For several years now, I've been saying it's time
to scrap NASA. That is
still true, I believe, but until that happens, NASA keeps spending money on
pointless and futile projects that deserve the taxpayers' attention.
This page is all about the latest news on the subject of space exploration
and the enormous price tags that come with those projects. The obsolescense
and pointlessness of NASA's manned space flight program is covered on
this page, but
NASA's other make-work projects are highlighted below. In addition, there are links
to other articles with derogatory commentary about NASA's pointless goals and colossal cost.
These space exploration projects have very few tangible end products — certainly nothing
that benefits the average taxpayer. The exploration of other planets (or any other space flight) is
not authorized by the Constitution and is not the proper role of government. The
exception would be military projects in support of our national defense, but the Pentagon
has its own aerospace facilities.
Yes, I know NASA's projects are the highest of high tech. I'm not saying space flight research
isn't cool, but spending taxpayers' money on it is illegal. The Constitution defines the limits of our government,
and NASA operates outside those limits. The work being done by NASA should (according to the
10th Amendment) be conducted by private industries, and of course no private company could afford
to spend billions of dollars per year on pointless experiments in zero-g.
As the shuttle Atlantis landed in Florida recently I noticed that NASA called the
flight a "mission to expand the global village of space."
NASA seems to have two ultimate goals: finding life on another planet, and building a global village in
space, for the purpose of advancing a unified world government. It is difficult to imagine a greater waste of
Incidentally, the section about NASA's mission to appease the Muslims has been moved
to this page.
Uh-oh. It's a lunar emergency! Scientists are baffled! Give us five billion dollars! NASA
is to launch a 'priority' mission to explore mysterious domes on the moon. NASA is to launch a 'priority'
mission to explore mysterious mounds on the moon that have baffled scientists. The US space agency has unveiled plans
for a rover to visit the Gruithuisen Domes, geological features which experts believe were formed by a sticky magma rich in
silica, similar in composition to granite. On Earth, formations like these need oceans of liquid water and plate
tectonics to form, but without such ingredients on the moon, experts are unsure how the domes formed and evolved over time.
Bad News! The Plants Grown in Moon
Soil Turned Out Wretched. Remember when scientists grew seedlings in actual Moon soil, collected by Apollo
astronauts? Well, don't get too psyched for delicious lunar salad just yet. In a new interview with Astronomy
Magazine, University of Florida horticultural scientist Rob Ferl — the author of a recent Communications
Biology study detailing the experiment — brought us down to Earth with a description of just how wretched the
miraculous plants turned out. "Plants grown in lunar soil tended to be smaller," Ferl told the magazine, "and they
contained purplish pigments that were indications of stress."
employees caught buying child porn escape prosecution and now their names are being kept secret. NASA employees
were caught buying child pornography from a criminal ring in Eastern Europe that distributed images of minors as young as
three, it can be revealed. An investigation by Daily Mail Online found staff members from the space agency paid for
pictures and videos of children in sexual situations, but were never prosecuted. Their names have never been released
because of government guidelines which protect their privacy.
will grow artificial steak from beef cells on the ISS in a bid to produce 'tender and juicy' meat. If humans
are to live on the moon and one day make it to Mars then scientists must come up a way for them to grow their own food.
To that end, astronauts on the International Space Station (ISS) could soon be tucking into a tasty meal of fresh
steak — but only if they can perfect the technology of cultivating it from beef cells in microgravity first.
That is just one of the scientific experiments being carried out by three amateur astronauts who are launching to the orbital
observatory later today for what will be NASA's first ever space tourism mission.
the Progressive Mind. The money progressives rob from the nation's bank will be redistributed according to the
dictates of "social justice" — a measure based on their social whims. In the name of social justice, for
example, the Biden regime has allocated $7.5 billion to put a black female astronaut on the moon because she is black
and female. This is a preposterous virtue signal that violates the very spirit of America's color- and gender-blind
Constitution. But a government that has no respect for the Constitution or the nation's laws needn't be bothered by that.
Musk's Space X Might Need to Rescue an American Astronaut Stranded by Russia. [Scroll down] The whole
idea of the I.S.S. was to have governments cooperate with operating a space station, which would (hopefully) force or teach
the folks down here to behave. That concept has seemed to work for over two decades, even when Russia invaded Georgia
and Crimea. When George W. Bush made the boneheaded decision to end the Space Shuttle program, which left America
depending on Russia for rides to and from the I.S.S., that put us behind in our space exploration. Thankfully, the
private sector, led by Elon Musk and his company Space X in conjunction with NASA, recently allowed the United States to
forgo depending in Russia for rides, and now can send manned rockets from the United States' soil again.
Space Chief Threatens to Crash International Space Station into U.S. or Europe. Russia is certainly getting
very good at making threats. Today, President Vladimir Putin threatened nuclear war or something. He put Russia's
nuclear forces on "high alert," according to media reports. Now, Dmitry Rogozin, the director-general of Russia's space
program, Roscosmos, tweeted out a threat to the International Space Station, saying that U.S. and NATO sanctions could
"destroy our cooperation on the ISS." He also suggested that the ISS could crash in the United States or Europe.
There are currently four NASA astronauts, two Russian cosmonauts, and one European astronaut onboard the space station.
Maria Cantwell: NASA's role in space travel is confusing Americans. NASA's days aren't numbered but it's
billionaires with aspirations of conquering other planets that are capturing people's imagination and changing the trajectory
of American exploration of outer space. Congress is aware that Americans thinking about a return to the moon now
picture billionaires in corporate offices leading the charge instead of NASA's Mission Control Center, according to
Sen. Maria Cantwell, Washington Democrat. At a Senate hearing for oversight of NASA, Ms. Cantwell told NASA
officials that she has witnessed a shift in people's thinking about the government's role in space exploration.
Scientists At NASA Are Made To Feel Shame During Race Workshop. This workshop presentation by Lila Higgins and
Miguel Ordeñana from the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County made sure every scientist at NASA was made to feel
shame for being white and made sure moving forward they will be more mindful of how the tone of their skin can trigger those
who darker tones. An entire guideline on how to speak to anyone considering a minority was outlined including 'being
mindful of sharing when it could cause FURTHER harm to black, indigenous, or people of color.' The guidance also
suggests using SIMPLE language so it is easy for everyone to understand, as if to say, people of color may be dumber than you
white folks so make sure to speak down to them. [Video clip]
Biden: We Just Parked a Telescope a Million Miles in Space to Peer Deep Into the Origins of Time. At its
launch on Christmas Day, the James Webb Space Telescope cost $10 billion. That seemed like a lot until a year ago when
a certain political party took over Washington and began spending several trillion dollars, with trillions more planned. Since
its launch, the 14,300-pound observatory has been traveling a million miles out to its reserved parking spot, there to orbit the Sun
alongside Earth. [...] The Webb telescope is 100 times more powerful than the Hubble Space Telescope, launched in 1990, that has
delivered for study over the ensuing years thousands of stunning images of distant galaxies, clouds of space dust and gases, and star
nurseries where new stars are forever forming.
The Editor says...
For a Godless humanist, trying to disprove the first chapter of the Bible, by using elaborate instruments like this, is all very
exciting. Who else benefits from this project? Nobody! For the rest of us, it's ten billion dollars down the drain.
cheer as Nasa's $10 billion James Webb Space Telescope module detaches from rocket and begins one million mile journey into
space. NASA's revolutionary James Webb Space Telescope has begun its one million mile voyage into solar orbit
after successful lift off following decades of planning and delays. Jubilant scientists and engineers shouted 'Go Webb,
go!' as the telescope module detached from its rocket and floated off into space far above the earth's surface. It is
hoped that the observatory, a replacement for the 30-year-old Hubble telescope, will by travelling so far out be able to peer
back in time 13.5 [billion] years — to a point within a mere 100 [million] years of the big bang.
Telescope away with two major hurdles cleared after flawless launch. Today [12/25/2021], the James Webb Space
Telescope started its journey to a location over a million kilometers from Earth, where it will start its science mission in
roughly six months. "This is a day for the ages," said Ken Sembach, director of the Space Telescope Science
Institute. "Science won't be the same after today." Sembach said those words roughly an hour before the launch,
well before any last minute glitches could have delayed matters, and long before the complicated series of events that would
see parts of the observatory unfold from their compact launch configuration.
When NASA goes
woke. [Scroll down] At page 348, NASA gives examples of how it's taken the lead in figuring out the
obvious: poor people are less likely to have power returned quickly after hurricanes than rich people; satellites may be
useful in locating water sources in dry regions; big cities without trees get hot (at least, I think that's what it said);
and climate change causing rising waters always hits poor people hardest (and apparently never hits rich people like the
Obamas, with their multi-million-dollar waterfront properties). Ultimately, as best as I can tell having skimmed this
gobbledygook, NASA is restating facts we already know and political points that have already been scored, wrapping them up in
woke language, and taking taxpayer money to put a big bow on the package.
the willies about some of those new NASA space probes. I had some apprehension when I heard the news. The
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) launched a mission to crash a spacecraft into an asteroid in an attempt
to "knock it off course." [...] There are approximately 1.113 million asteroids identified by NASA ranging in size from 329
miles across to 33 feet across. The objective of the DART mission, the U.S. component of a collaboration with the
European Space Agency (ESA) called AIDA (Asteroid Impact and Deflection Assessment), is to determine if the motion of an
asteroid on a collision course with Earth could be changed to avoid Earth impact. If DART can change the trajectory of
an asteroid millions of miles from Earth, even by a little, it could significantly decrease the chance of a collision with
the Earth. What could go wrong? Well, lately the scientific community has a less-than-stellar track record when
conducting experiments for "the good of mankind." What contingencies have been explored to ensure a course change in the
trajectory of Dimorphos, no matter how slight, does not pose a future threat to Earth? What "Butterfly Effect," could
result should the trajectory of the mini-moon be altered by just one degree?
SpaceX Launch DART: First Test Mission to Defend Planet Earth. NASA's Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART),
the world's first full-scale mission to test technology for defending Earth against potential asteroid or comet hazards,
launched Wednesday [11/24/2021] at 1:21 a.m. EST on a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket [...] at Vandenberg Space Force Base
in California. Just one part of NASA's larger planetary defense strategy, DART — built and managed by the Johns
Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) in Laurel, Maryland — will impact a known asteroid that is not a threat to
Earth. Its goal is to slightly change the asteroid's motion in a way that can be accurately measured using ground-based telescopes.
Double Asteroid Redirection Test
(DART). DART is a spacecraft designed to impact an asteroid as a test of technology. DART's target
asteroid is NOT a threat to Earth. This asteroid system is a perfect testing ground to see if intentionally crashing a
spacecraft into an asteroid is an effective way to change its course, should an Earth-threatening asteroid be discovered in
the future. [...] DART is the first-ever mission dedicated to investigating and demonstrating one method of asteroid
deflection by changing an asteroid's motion in space through kinetic impact. This method will have DART deliberately
collide with a target asteroid — which poses no threat to Earth[,] in order to change its speed and path.
DART's target is the binary, near-Earth asteroid system Didymos, composed of the roughly 780-meter (2,560-foot) -diameter
"Didymos" and the smaller, approximately 160-meter (530-foot)-size "Dimorphos," which orbits Didymos.
The Editor says...
As usual, there is no mention of the price tag for this mission. I really wish NASA had consulted with me before launching
(presumably) hundreds of millions of dollars out into space (again) on a mission to solve a problem we don't have; but now that it's
underway, I hope it is successful, and it doesn't accidentally steer a huge boulder into the earth. That would be detrimental
to the Dart brand.
Seeks Ideas for a Nuclear Reactor on the Moon. If anyone has a good idea on how to put a nuclear fission power
plant on the moon, the U.S. government wants to hear about it. NASA and the nation's top federal nuclear research lab
on Friday [11/19/2021] put out a request for proposals for a fission surface power system. NASA is collaborating with
the U.S. Department of Energy's Idaho National Laboratory to establish a sun-independent power source for missions to the
moon by the end of the decade. "Providing a reliable, high-power system on the moon is a vital next step in human space
exploration, and achieving it is within our grasp," Sebastian Corbisiero, the Fission Surface Power Project lead at the lab,
said in a statement.
The Editor says...
[#1] Who would benefit from this boondoggle, other than the contractors who put it together? [#2] The
moon is made of sterile dirt. There is no reason to go there, other than to impress other countries with our
rockets. In the Cold War, when rockets were relatively new, that was important. Today it is not.
[#3] The people making this proposal are the same people who oppose the construction of nuclear power plants in
the United States, and instead recommend the use of solar panels. With 100 percent sunny days, the moon is an
ideal place for solar panels.
Lucy mission will explain the origins of our solar system, UCF researcher says. NASA's Lucy mission that
launched at 5:34 a.m. Saturday from Kennedy Space Center will give the science community its first look at untouched
asteroids and will deepen an understanding of how our solar system was formed. Over the next 12 years, Lucy will fly by
the seven Trojan asteroids believed to be the only remaining original matter that formed giant planets. "What we are looking
for is a view back in time to the earliest days of when the solar system was put together," said Daniel Britt, University of Central
Florida physics professor and part of NASA's Lucy mission science team. "It gives us a better idea of how solar systems are
put together and what the material that makes up a solar system was like in the early days."
The Editor says...
[#1] As is often the case, there is no mention of the price tag for this mission in the article above. But in the next
article, we find that NASA blew a billion dollars on this pointless probe, looking for a way to "unlock secrets to the
formation of planets in our solar system." It's no secret. It's explained in the first chapter of the Bible.
Lucy spacecraft begins its wild 4 billion mile journey around the solar system. The Trojan asteroids share an
orbit with Jupiter, but they're not actually close to the planet. The Trojans are as far away from Jupiter as they are
from the sun. That means Lucy will travel nearly 4 billion miles in 12 years. "What's amazing about this
trajectory is we can continue to do loops," said Coralie Adam, Lucy's deputy navigation team chief at KinetX Aerospace.
"So after the final encounter with the binary asteroids, as long as the spacecraft is healthy, we plan to propose to NASA to
do an extended mission and explore more Trojans." Lucy was built by Lockheed Martin Space and launched Saturday atop a
United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket. When the spacecraft flies through the Trojan asteroids, it will have traveled
farther from the sun than any other solar-powered spacecraft (the record is currently held by the Juno spacecraft that's orbiting
Jupiter). Its far-flung predecessors relied on nuclear power. Solar power is preferred for its lower cost —
the Lucy mission cost $981 million — and for safety reasons.
NASA plan for Wi-Fi on the
moon tested to span Cleveland's digital divide. A new study from NASA reveals how a proposed lunar Wi-Fi
network could impact communities that lack reliable internet on Earth. The Compass Lab at NASA's Glenn Research Center
in Cleveland conducted the study in an effort to address connectivity concerns on Earth as a test-case for space. Local
neighborhoods were compared to the size of the prospective Artemis basecamp near the Moon's South Pole. At the same
time, the Greater Cleveland Partnership, an economic development organization, reached out to NASA to figure out the most
effective way to bring Wi-Fi to nearly 31% of Cleveland households without broadband access.
The Editor says...
You would need an antenna bigger than your house to pick up anything similar to a wi-fi signal from the moon.
And even if this were possible, do you really think you could share a wi-fi signal with everyone who can see the moon when you can see it?
And if that were possible, do you really think only the poor neighborhoods in Cleveland would benefit?
This idea is too stupid for a comic book, but NASA expects you to buy into it (one way or another).
On the other hand, maybe I'm mis-reading it. Maybe NASA's great concern is finding a way to provide the internet to
those of us who live on the moon. As if such people would rather look at click bait than bounce around in 1/6th G.
Here's a news bulletin: Nobody lives on the moon, and it is a virtual certainty that nobody will ever live on the moon.
given the number of other contributors to the national debt. The news media is happy to lead the cheers for NASA, even though
NASA hasn't accomplished anything that would benefit the population as a whole in many years.
used child actors in her space video. Vice President Kamala Harris's YouTube space series featured child actors
in its first installment. The YouTube Original Series, entitled "Get Curious with Vice President Harris," is aimed at
getting children interested in space and included an appearance by NASA astronaut Shane Kimbrough from the International
Space Station. But the children featured in the first installment of the series were child actors, including
13-year-old Trevor Bernardino. [...] The kid actors appear to be genuinely excited, and Harris seems to be revealing
something to them that they don't already know. The kids are relentlessly ebullient throughout the video.
Harris Uses Child Actors in Video to Promote NASA. Vice President Kamala Harris is starting a new series of
videos on YouTube aimed at promoting NASA to children, but was found to have used child actors in its very first video
instead of regular children, Fox News reports. [...] Despite being actors, the children pretended to be as amazed by the
presentation as regular children would have been. The video features a virtual meeting between the children and NASA
astronaut Shane Kimbrough, who is currently stationed in the International Space Station. Through the Zoom call,
Kimbrough led the child actors on a "scavenger hunt" for components to build a telescope, before the actors then got to meet
Harris at the Naval Observatory.
Harris's NASA video featured child actors. The first installment of Vice President Kamala Harris's YouTube
Originals space series featured child actors who auditioned for their roles in the project. Trevor Bernardino, a
13-year-old actor from Carmel, California, and one of five teenagers featured in the video, was asked to submit a monologue
discussing something he is passionate about and three questions for a world leader, according to an interview with KSBW TV.
Trevor then interviewed with the production director. [...] Filmed in August and released during World Space Week, the video
shows a group of children meeting with Harris at her residence, the Naval Observatory, where she introduces herself as the
chairwoman of the National Space Council.
Harris Hired Child Actors For Rebranding Effort That Failed. The Washington Examiner dug a little deeper into
the background of the Kamala Harris cringe video. Apparently, team Harris hired child actors to help create the
illusion for her rebranding effort. There are many details in the report that represent just how artificial and fake
the Biden administration is. [...] A fake stage set for Joe Biden to pretend he's giving discussions from the White
House. A group of kids hired by the White House to play the role of kids for a Kamala Harris propaganda effort.
Well, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see just how fake this entire effort is as constructed.
high-orbit telescope will study the origin of stars and galaxies. With so many institutions failing us, it is a
surprise to find a part of the federal government that more-or-less works: NASA's space exploration program. In
February, the agency's Perseverance rover and Ingenuity helicopter returned spectacular footage from the Jezero Crater on
Mars. Of the upcoming space missions, the James Webb Space Telescope has generated the most excitement. After
years of delay, it is scheduled to launch on December 18 from Kourou in French Guiana. Its 6.5-meter (21 foot) mirror
will make Webb far more precise than the Hubble Space Telescope, which has a 2.4-meter mirror. The mirror is composed
of 18 hexagonal segments that will fold up like origami to fit on an Ariane 5 rocket. The $10 billion project is
twenty times over budget and fifteen years behind schedule. What's the problem? Northrop Grumman, the principal
contractor, refuses to cooperate with investigators.
Force's Secretive X-37B Spaceplane Orbits Earth For 500th Day. The U.S. Air Force's secretive X-37B, also known
as the Orbital Test Vehicle (OTV-6), is a robotic spacecraft circling Earth for more than 500 days, according to
Space.com. X-37B's real mission in low Earth Orbit (LEO) is classified. But a 2017 Air Force press release
detailed the plane as a "host platform for experimental payloads."
Is Going on With Boeing's Starliner? New details are emerging about a technical problem that prevented NASA and
Boeing from conducting a test launch of a CST-100 Starliner spacecraft last week. The problem appears to be more severe
than previously believed, casting doubt on plans to launch the spacecraft later this month. Like a car in the garage
for repairs, Boeing's Starliner is back in the hangar as engineering teams scramble to fix a problem related to the
spacecraft's propulsion system. Specialists are working to "restore functionality" to 13 valves in the spacecraft's
propulsion system, as NASA explained in a recent statement. These valves, as NASA says, "connect to thrusters that
enable abort and in-orbit maneuvering," and they failed to open during the countdown on August 3, resulting in the
scrub. The Boeing Orbital Flight Test-2 mission to the International Space Station is now on an indefinite delay.
space chief threatens to leave International Space Station program unless U.S. lifts sanctions. Russia's space
chief threatened Monday [6/7/2021] to withdraw from the International Space Station program if U.S. sanctions against
Moscow's space entities are "not lifted in the near future." "If the sanctions against Progress and TsNIIMash remain
and are not lifted in the near future, the issue of Russia's withdrawal from the ISS will be the responsibility of the
American partners," Roscosmos Director General Dmitry Rogozin said during a Russian parliament hearing on Monday, according
to an NBC translation. "Either we work together, in which case the sanctions are lifted immediately, or we will not
work together and we will deploy our own station," he added.
choice of Starship proves government now fully embraces capitalism in space. Five years ago, before Donald
Trump had even announced he was running for president, before Elon Musk had proposed his Starship/Superheavy rocket, and even
before SpaceX had successfully begun to dominate the launch market, Jerry Hendricks at the Center for for New American
Security (CNAS) asked me to write a policy paper on the state of the American launch industry, providing some background and
more importantly, some recommendations that policy makers in Washington, dependent on that launch industry, could use as
guidance in the coming years. CNAS is a Washington, D.C., think tank that was founded in the middle-2000s by two
political Washington insiders, one a Democrat and the other a Republican, with a focus on foreign policy and defense issues
and the central goal of encouraging bi-partisan discussion. Hendricks' area of focus was defense and aerospace matters, and
at the time he thought the changes being wrought by SpaceX's with its partly reusable Falcon 9 rocket required in-depth analysis.
is Ready for The Moon. Space is more than "the final frontier," it represents America's future — and
Americans are ready to embrace that future. Space is a chance to bring together the public and private sectors toward a
noble end and it is fast becoming the psychological bridge between Americans uncertain of the present and future. With
space policy direction for the new administration still largely undefined — space was not a significant issue for
the Biden campaign — we must swiftly recommit to lifting humans — and our national pride —
back toward the moon, and onto to Mars. If cynics doubt the power of space — commercial, civilian, national
security, big science, and human exploration — to lift a nation, they need only review the Apollo program,
pathfinder to the current Artemis effort, once again ambitiously aiming to put humans on the moon.
The Editor offers this rebuttal:
[#1] Space exploration and manned space travel are flashy distractions to draw our attention away from our abusive government, stolen
presidential election, open borders, pork barrel spending in trillion-dollar quantities, incompetent video-conference
schools, and the corrupt two-tier justice system. "Stimulus" checks are the bread, and manned space flights are the
circuses. [#2] There is nothing to be gained by sending people to the Moon or to Mars, either on a round trip or a one-way
ticket. The only people who would benefit are politicians and government contractors. [#3] The national debt is
already $30 trillion. There is no money for frivolous electives. [#4] If several people are killed when the rocket
to Mars blows up, it will only make the space program even more costly and more permanent, because "that's what the [deceased] astronauts
would have wanted." This whole idea is a trap, and a bottomless money pit. Let us avoid this mistake before it is made.
Battery Was Just Jettisoned From The ISS. With space junk becoming a significant problem that could wreak havoc
on working satellites, the International Space Station (ISS) decided to dump an SUV-sized pallet of batteries into low Earth
orbit. [...] The pallet is made of nickel-hydrogen batteries and will orbit the Earth for the next two to four years "before
burning up harmlessly in the atmosphere," according to NASA. [...] The ejection of the 2.9-ton object comes as the European
Space Agency (ESA) recently warned that millions of objects are orbiting Earth, and there's bound to be a collision between
space junk and working satellites.
The Editor says...
Sounds harmless, if it breaks up into little pieces — except for all that nickel pollution in the atmosphere.
using NASA facility to house migrant children. A NASA site in California is being considered as a potential
location to house the growing number of migrants coming across the border, according to sources briefed on the plans.
Sources told ABC News that plans are still in flux, but the site, Moffett Federal Airfield in Mountain View, is expected to
house a number of unaccompanied minors in Customs and Border Protection custody, which has risen to just under 3,500 in
recent weeks, according to sources and internal CBP documents reviewed by ABC News.
After 3 Fails, SpaceX Rocket Lands
Safety. More [than] that it was caught midair. I did not know the Federal Communications Commission
awarded Elon Musk's SpaceX with nearly $900 million worth of federal subsidies. [Video clip]
The Editor says...
If SpaceX works, why do we need NASA?
A manned mission to Mars would be completely pointless. Mars Is a Hellhole.
The central thing about Mars is that it is not Earth, not even close. In fact, the only things our planet and Mars
really have in common is that both are rocky planets with some water ice and both have robots (and Mars doesn't even have
that many). Mars has a very thin atmosphere; it has no magnetic field to help protect its surface from radiation from
the sun or galactic cosmic rays; it has no breathable air and the average surface temperature is a deadly 80 degrees below
zero. Musk thinks that Mars is like Earth? For humans to live there in any capacity they would need to build
tunnels and live underground, and what is not enticing about living in a tunnel lined with SAD lamps and trying to grow
lettuce with UV lights? So long to deep breaths outside and walks without the security of a bulky spacesuit, knowing
that if you're out on an extravehicular activity and something happens, you've got an excruciatingly painful 60-second death
waiting for you. Granted, walking around on Mars would be a life-changing, amazing, profound experience. But
visiting as a proof of technology or to expand the frontier of human possibility is very different from living there.
It is not in the realm of hospitable to humans. Mars will kill you.
space exploration a waste of money or a necessary endeavor? In 1957, the Soviet Union launched the first
satellite (Sputnik) into orbit. The Soviets had "beaten us" into space. That was a "wake-up call" to the United
States on many levels. In response, the U.S. began a massive program to catch up with, and pass, Russian
technology. That effort led America to the first manned landings on, and safe return from, the Moon in 1969. Since
then, we have sent unmanned landers as far away as Titan, a moon of Saturn, and produced astounding photographs from the
surface of that frozen world, where there are oceans of liquid methane. Many other amazing achievements since then have
occurred, and the efforts continue, not only by the U.S., but by other nations including India, China, and even Qatar.
In the U.S., those efforts consume billions of dollars. Many question whether it is worth the cost, especially by a
nation that is trillions of dollars in debt, most of it to a foreign enemy nation (China).
Perseverance rover nails Mars landing, ready to search for life. NASA's done it again. The agency's
Perseverance rover, a 1-ton mobile science laboratory, slowly lowered to the surface of an ancient lakebed on Mars on
Thursday afternoon. Hoots and hollers rang throughout NASA's Mission Control at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in
Pasadena, California, at the moment of touchdown, but this wasn't like past Mars landings. Jubilant scientists and
engineers jumped from chairs, but social distancing requirements prevented them from their usual embrace. That's what
landing a rover on Mars during a global pandemic looks like.
Mars rover Perseverance successfully touches down on the red planet. NASA kicked off a new era of Mars
exploration Thursday with the successful landing of Perseverance, a car-size robotic explorer that will search for traces of
ancient life on the planet and collect what could be the first rocky samples from Mars that are sent back to Earth. The
rover touched down at around 3:55 p.m. ET, after executing a daring and dramatic landing that had been nicknamed the
"seven minutes of terror." Perseverance is now NASA's fifth rover to land on Mars and is set to begin a two-year mission to
roam its surface and search for signs of ancient microbial life. It is also the latest of three new missions that
arrived at the red planet in February. Earlier this month, two other spacecraft launched by the United Arab Emirates
and China reached Mars and moved into orbit around the planet.
The Editor says...
I've said all this before about NASA's robotic probes on Mars, but I'll say it again on this occasion:
[#1] News articles about NASA missions almost never mention the cost, and never mention the fact that nobody (except NASA contractors)
benefits in any tangible way from this expense. [#2] NASA's entire reason for sending probes to Mars is to disprove the first
chapter of the Bible: NASA's stated goal is to try to find "clues to the origin of the universe." [#3] This latest probe
will find no evidence of life on Mars, past or present. The response from NASA will be, "we've got to send another probe!"
If this probe drives around, flips over a rock, and finds a knife and fork made of titanium, the response from NASA will be, "we've
got to send another probe!" But the former result is, of course, much more likely.
Private Citizens Paying $55 Million Each For Trip To International Space Station. Three private citizens, all
from three different countries, will pay $55 million each to travel to the International Space Station for eight days as soon
as next January in what has been proposed as the first entirely private spaceflight mission in human history. The trip,
which will be conducted by Axiom Space, plans to send the three private citizens to the ISS along with Michael
López-Alegría, a former NASA astronaut and the vice president of Axiom Space. The other men who will be on
the mission include: Larry Connor, 71, an American entrepreneur and real estate investor, Mark Pathy, 51, a Canadian
investor, and Eytan Stibbe, 63, an Israeli businessman and ex-fighter pilot.
The Editor says...
I wonder if these amateur astronauts will be (or have been) required to sign non-disclosure agreements about
the activities (or lack thereof) they will observe while aboard the ISS.
Force Nearly Tripling in Size, Gaining a Reserve Component in 2021. The nation's newest branch of the military
has announced that it expects to nearly triple its forces next year. According to Stars and Stripes, the Space Force,
established in December 2019 with the strong backing of President Donald Trump, aims to expand from 2,400 active-duty
personnel to 6,200 by the end of 2021. The Space Force was created to increase the nation's capabilities when it comes
to the construction and operation of space vehicles, rockets and satellites, according to Forbes. Additionally, it's
charged with more familiar projects, such as the nation's global positioning system and weather satellite program.
The Editor says...
The Global Positioning System is currently administered by the U.S. Air Force. When this is transferred to the Space Force,
will that be an additional expenditure, or just a new name for the same facilities and personnel?
Force Reveals What Their Personnel Will Officially Be Called. The United States Space Force (USSF), which is
the sixth branch of the United States Armed Forces, revealed on Friday that their personnel will officially be called
"Guardians." "Today, after a yearlong process that produced hundreds of submissions and research involving space
professionals and members of the general public, we can finally share with you the name by which we will be known:
Guardians," the USSF said in a statement. "The opportunity to name a force is a momentous responsibility.
Guardians is a name with a long history in space operations, tracing back to the original command motto of Air Force Space
Command in 1983, 'Guardians of the High Frontier.'"
The Editor says...
Now that the Space Force is up and running, why are we still spending money on NASA? On the other hand, if we really need a Space Force,
why not just militarize NASA? If both entities exist, something tells me the great majority of the Space Force's activity will be secret and/or
redundant, and thus ten times as costly as it should be.
chief says he does not plan to serve in Biden administration. NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine said this week
that he does not plan to stay in his role as head of the space agency under President-elect Joe Biden's administration even
if he is asked to serve, according to a report published Sunday. Bridenstine told Aviation Daily that his decision was
driven by a desire to support the "best interest" of NASA and the country's space exploration goals as a whole, rather than
any partisan leanings. "For that, what you need is somebody who has a close relationship with the president of the
United States. You need somebody who is trusted by the administration... including the OMB [Office of Management and
Budget], the National Space Council and the National Security Council, and I think that I would not be the right person for
that in a new administration," Bridenstine said in an interview with the outlet.
doles out half a million in taxpayer dollars for far-out alien detection program at Georgetown. This election
week, our [Golden Horseshoe] award is going to the District of Columbia's non-voting member of Congress Eleanor Holmes Norton
for her role in securing more than half a million taxpayer dollars to ponder new and unconventional alien life detection
techniques. According to a recently released report from Open the Books, in 2019, the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA) awarded $549,974 to a Georgetown University program — a school with a $1.7 billion
endowment — with a focus on new methods for the detection of alien life.
Not that it matters to anyone... NASA
says there's more water than previously thought on the moon. NASA scientists have found more water on the moon
than previously thought — a crucial discovery that could help greatly fuel deep-space exploration, the agency
revealed Monday [10/26/2020]. The water — which was discovered for the first time in areas outside the
moon's sunless frigid poles — is possibly trapped in "glass beads" about the size of a pencil tip in the soil,
scientists said at a press conference. "This discovery that water might be distributed across the lunar surface and not
limited" to ice at the poles, as the space agency thought, raises the possibility that it could be "accessible as a human
resource," said Paul Hertz, NASA's astrophysics director. Enough water was detected in a cubic meter of sunlit soil to
fill a 12-ounce bottle, said Casey Honniball of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md.
The Editor says...
The nerds and geeks who carefully study articles about NASA news and NASA's proposed multi-billion-dollar missions
are a lot like the American housewives obsessed with the British royal family, or old rednecks in Lubbock who closely follow
all the news about the Dallas Cowboys, or college graduates in Dallas who are big fans of European soccer.
None of them have the slightest chance of participating in their idols' daily activities, yet they are perpetually
fascinated. The story immediately above probably thrills the aforementioned geeks. But would you spend all day
digging up a cubic meter of dirt just to get a drink of water? Is the discovery of minuscule quantities of water
supposed to make us believe that the Moon is potentially a decent place to live — or that something lives there already?
NASA's new $23 million space
toilet is ready for launch. NASA is launching a new space toilet to the International Space Station next week
for astronauts to test out before it's used on future missions to the moon or Mars. The $23 million toilet system,
known as the Universal Waste Management System (UWMS), is 65% smaller and 40% lighter than the toilet currently in use on the
space station, and can support larger crews.
Publicity stunt: NASA
astronaut will vote in 2020 presidential election from space. NASA astronaut Kate Rubins plans to cast her vote
for the 2020 presidential election on the International Space Station — more than 200 miles above the Earth's
surface, according to The Associated Press. "I think it's really important for everybody to vote," said Rubins.
"If we can do it from space, then I believe folks can do it from the ground, too."
49 NASA Scientists
Tell The Truth. Next time someone tells you that scientists all support the "dangerous climate change from CO2"
hypothesis, point out to them that forty-nine former NASA scientists have written an open letter to NASA pointing out that
NASA is hyping unsubstantiated and unverified claims about climate.
"Overstressed" NASA Mars
exploration budget threatens missions. [Scroll down] Mars 2020 [now known as Perseverance] previously
suffered technical problems that caused cost increases. NASA's fiscal year 2021 budget proposal estimated the cost to develop
the mission at nearly $2.04 billion, an increase of 21.4% from the baseline cost estimate made in 2017. Problems
with one of the instruments on the rover as well as its sample caching system contributed to the overruns.
Mars Perseverance rover launches to hunt for signs of ancient life. The biggest, most sophisticated Mars rover ever built — a car-size
vehicle bristling with cameras, microphones, drills and lasers — blasted off Thursday [7/30/2020] as part of an ambitious, long-range project to bring
the first Martian rock samples back to Earth to be analyzed for evidence of ancient life.
Mars rover set to launch from Florida in search of ancient life on the Red Planet. Perseverance will soon be on
its way to Mars to look for signs of ancient life and test technology that could one day be used to send astronauts to the
Red Planet. The rover, about the size of a car, will collect samples that for the first time will be brought back to
Earth by a spacecraft sent to gather them, building upon discoveries of NASA's past rovers that found Mars could have once supported
life. Perseverance is scheduled to launch from Cape Canaveral on Thursday [7/30/2020] between 7:50 a.m. and 9:50 a.m.
atop a United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket and is one of three spacecraft launching to Mars this summer. Two others
have already launched: the Hope Orbiter from the United Arab Emirates that will observe the planet's atmosphere and weather,
and China's Tianwen-1 lander and rover.
The Editor says...
NASA is looking for any sign of life — past or present — by sending probe after probe to Mars.
To put it another way, they're trying the same thing over and over, expecting different results someday. That's insanity.
This latest mission has a price tag of $2.04 billion, and the rover will never benefit anyone outside of NASA and its
circle of overpaid contractors. That's not only insane, it's an expense that is not authorized by the Constitution (as if
that matters any more.) But you can search high and low, and you'll never find a U.S. politician — especially in Florida or
Texas — who will say anything bad about NASA.
report: NASA's Orion is a program of lies. In a report released today [7/16/2020], NASA's inspector
general confirmed unequivocally what I have been saying for years, that the agency's project to build the Orion capsule has
been built on lies, from the beginning. First of all, the report slams NASA for purposely excluding from its public
budget almost 60% of the total cost for the entire Orion project. [...] In other words, since 2006 NASA has been illegally
mislabeling 59% of Orion's cost to hide this from the public. Through 2030 it expects Orion to cost almost $30 billion,
but it has been advertising the cost as only $12 billion. It appears that to Congress NASA has been more honest, though
they and Congress have worked together to try to keep this fact quiet.
did NASA's head of human spaceflight suddenly resign? People resigning or being dismissed from the Trump
administration is obviously nothing new these days. We've seen virtually unprecedented rates of turnover for the past
couple of years. But the most recent departure comes at a very strange time and leaves a bit of a mystery in its
wake. The resignation of Doug Loverro, NASA's chief of human space exploration programs, was announced last
night. He'd only been on the job for six months, but that's not the only strange part of this event. We're only
eight days away from the first launch of astronauts into orbit from an American spaceport on a rocket built in America in
over a decade. Elon Musk's SpaceX corporation is prepared to launch two astronauts into orbit on a Falcon 9 Crew
Dragon flight on May 27th, but Loverro won't be the one overseeing this historic mission.
human spaceflight chief resigns just days before historic SpaceX manned launch. The head of NASA's human
spaceflight office has resigned just a little more than one week before the agency plans to have its first manned launch from
American soil for the first time in nearly a decade. Doug Loverro was selected in October as NASA's new associate
administrator for the Human Exploration and Operations Mission Directorate[.] In a congressional notification first
obtained by POLITICO, NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine said Loverro resigned on Monday [5/18/2020].
White elephant: NASA
wants to turn a moon crater into a giant telescope. NASA has given out some new grants for innovative space
projects. Perhaps the wildest of the chosen projects is a plan to put a radio telescope on the moon that could give us
a glimpse of some of the earliest moments after the Big Bang. The NASA supported project aims to put a 3,281-foot radio
telescope within a crater on the far side of the moon.
The Editor says...
If the United States had a $24 trillion surplus instead of a $24 trillion national debt,
and if there was any beneficial end product resulting from radioastronomy, then I might be in favor of this idea.
The Editor says...
I already know how the entire solar system was formed. It's explained in the first chapter of the Bible.
Please don't spend the taxpayers' money trying to disprove the Bible.
signs order encouraging US to mine the moon. The moon's water ice and other natural resources can be mined and
used by the United States, according to a new executive order signed by President Trump. The president on Monday
[4/6/2020] signed the executive order, which has been in the works for about a year, titled Encouraging International Support
for the Recovery and Use of Space Resources. The directive stresses that the 1967 Outer Space Treaty allows for the use
of space resources on the moon, Mars and elsewhere.
The Editor says...
There is nothing on the surface of the moon but sterile dirt, and very small patches of ice at the poles.
There is no shortage of dirt or ice on this planet. President Trump's Space Force is only a few months old,
and apparently it is already looking for something to do.
announces launch of manned American rocket from American soil. For the first time since the final space shuttle
mission in 2011, astronauts will launch into space aboard an American rocket and spacecraft from American soil, according to
NASA. The agency, along with SpaceX, is eyeing a mid-to-late May launch for the manned SpaceX Demo-2 flight test from
Kennedy Space Center in Florida.
the Failure of Boeing's Starliner Space Capsule Really Means. Boeing's new spacecraft, the CST-100 Starliner,
experienced a partial failure during its first test flight to the International Space Station (ISS) on December 20, 2019.
Originally, the Starliner was supposed to launch from Earth and dock with the ISS to prove that the capsule could safely carry
humans to the station. However, an error in the mission timer aboard the capsule meant that the spacecraft fell short in
its orbit and could not rendezvous with the station as intended. Boeing said that had there been a crew on board, they
would not have been in danger. More so, a crew on board could have possibly corrected the error while in transit.
However, the nature of the failure implies that there are further systemic problems with the software architecture itself.
The Editor says...
Don't ever believe statements about how "the astronauts were never in danger," or "would not have been in danger."
Anybody who is attached to a rocket when it takes off is in danger.
Still Light-Years Away from Spending Reform. If recent developments at the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA) are any indication, the prospect for spending reform is still light-years away. This week,
taxpayers learned that America's space agency overpaid Boeing $287 million for operational flights to the International Space
Station (ISS). The Inspector General (IG) report revealed that NASA continues to contract with Boeing for these spacefaring
flights, despite Boeing charging NASA over 60 percent more than its competitors. If lawmakers don't sound the alarm and
call for greater oversight and accountability, taxpayers will be sucked further into a black hole of wasteful spending. On
November 14, the IG released a bombshell report on agency watchers unaccustomed to timely (or particularly biting) IG reports.
Wine cellar in space: 12 bottles
arrive for year of aging. A dozen bottles of fine French wine arrived at the space station Monday [11/4/2019],
not for the astronauts, but for science. The red Bordeaux wine will age for a year up there before returning to
Earth. Researchers will study how weightlessness and space radiation affect the aging process.
The Editor says...
This is a publicity stunt that benefits almost nobody, and could have been done with unmanned space vehicles.
Projects of this sort are all that's left of America's manned space flight program, which costs about $19 billion
NASA paid SpaceX for
safety review after Musk smoked pot. SpaceX CEO Elon Musk's infamous pot-smoking incident last year prompted
NASA to order a mandatory review of the federal contractor's workplace culture — but taxpayers, not the company,
are bearing the cost, according to contracting records reviewed by Politico. The space agency agreed to pay SpaceX
$5 million in May to cover the cost of the review, which includes educating its employees and ensuring they are following
strict guidelines for federal contractors barring illegal drug use.
Action and NASA. In the 47 years since the last man set foot on the moon, the space program has changed a great
deal. One of those changes has been incorporating mandated affirmative action policies. These policies have had
an incredibly negative effect on both the progress in the space program and the engineers whose careers have been destroyed
by them. The federal government mandates that a given percentage of work on a government contract go to minority-owned
businesses. When building a large and complicated system like a space vehicle, it is almost impossible for a company
like Boeing or Lockheed to meet this requirement by hiring out specific design work to small, minority-owned companies.
Even if that were feasible, those companies do not exist. Enter subcontracting companies. A subcontracting company
is owned by someone of the appropriate race or sex to fulfill the quotas established by the government funding requirements.
astronaut accused of stealing identity, accessing bank account of [her] estranged wife while in space: report.
A NASA astronaut has been accused of committing the first crime in outer space after her estranged wife alleged she stole her
identity and accessed her bank account without permission during a six-month mission aboard the International Space
Station. Former Air Force intelligence officer Summer Worden, from Kansas, has been involved in a bitter divorce with
astronaut Anne McClain since 2018 but the battle heated up after Worden filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission
and NASA's Office of Inspector General accusing her wife of assuming her identity and gaining improper access to her private
financial records while orbiting the earth, the New York Times reported.
Was she arrested in space? NASA
astronaut accused of crime committed in space. Authorities are investigating the first allegation of a crime
committed in space. Astronaut Anne McClain has been accused of unlawfully accessing her estranged spouse's bank account
aboard the International Space Station. McClain and her spouse, Summer Worden, have been engaged in a custody battle
over Worden's six year-old son Briggs after filing for divorce in October 2018.
puts Alabama center in charge of moon lander program, drawing Texans' ire. NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine
announced today that Marshall Space Flight Center in Alabama will take the lead role in developing the vehicles for landing
astronauts on the moon — which could be good news for Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin space venture, but
definitely came as bad news for Texas lawmakers.
Sole-Source Northrop to Build a Space Station to Orbit the Moon? NASA's Artemis Project is a multi-billion
dollar bet that we can return to the moon in just five years' time. To get us there, the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration plans to build a "Lunar Gateway" space station where spaceships will dock, and from which lunar shuttles will
descend and ascend, carrying astronauts to and from the lunar surface. There's just one problem with this plan:
Originally envisioned as a near-decade-long marathon in which NASA would methodically make its way back to the moon by 2028,
the moon race has morphed into a sprint.
change their mind: Majority now favor a manned Mars mission. Two planets in our galaxy are inhabited. One
is Earth, where humans have made a mess of things for quite a few centuries. The other is Mars, which is totally inhabited by
robots, driving, drilling, listening, sampling their way around that sandy wasteland. For reasons that escape some flat-earthers,
abundant curiosity exists about the Red Planet that's only half the size of Earth. The desolation on Mars, they believe, might
shed light on the origins of life on Earth. Of course, exploring the desolation of Arizona would be a lot cheaper.
The Editor says...
The Constitution does not authorize the exploration of other planets. The popularity of such an idea does not change the Constitution.
Because the "clues about the origins of the universe" might be hiding there, and only there. NASA
is going to Titan: Space agency reveals Dragonfly mission to explore the surface of Saturn's largest moon.
NASA has announced a plan to explore the surface of Saturn's largest moon, Titan. The space agency made the announcement
in a media teleconference Thursday afternoon [6/27/2019], detailing its vision of a robotic rotorcraft dubbed Dragonfly that
will collect samples and measure soil composition in search for signs of habitability. The enormous, icy moon is said
to be the most Earth-like world in the solar system, and previous findings by the Cassini mission suggest it holds some
of the ingredients necessary for the emergence of life.
The Editor says...
The godless scientists at NASA do not understand, or will not admit, that the main ingredient "necessary for the emergence of life" is creation.
They gone to the moon. They've gone to Mars. They've looked everywhere. But the creation of life is in short supply everywhere
they look, except here at home. The first chapter of the Bible offers an explanation of the creation of the universe that is far more credible
than anything NASA has produced. NASA's entire purpose in the 21st Century is to disprove the Bible.
Whittington: A Replacement
For NASA's International Space Station Is On The Way. The International Space Station, by any measure, has been
a triumph for the scientific discoveries and the technological innovations that it has given birth to. The ISS has also
proven to be a model for international cooperation in space that NASA would like to see replicated for the "return to the
moon" program. However, noting that all good things must come to an end, the space agency is already entertaining
commercial replacements for the ISS. Current thinking proposes that a company (likely several) would build its own
space station, and NASA would become an anchor customer.
The Editor says...
There is no public clamor for this. You didn't vote on it. NASA has decided to spend your money on this
project anyway. What activity aboard the current space station has benefitted you in any way?
Coup by NASA's Bureaucracy. Every single big space project since the founding of NASA has always been proposed
and approved by elected officials. NASA officials might have lobbied for one version or another, but always,
always, it was understood and accepted that the project did not exist without first getting an enthusiastic and very
public authorization from elected officials. What was understood without question was that the right to make these
fundamental policy decisions belonged only to the lawmakers, elected as they were by the citizenry under the Constitution.
NASA's new Lunar Gateway project, however, is something altogether different. It was conceived, designed, and proposed
by the big aerospace companies Lockheed Martin and Boeing as a justification for the continuing construction of SLS and
Orion. It was added as a budget line item by NASA bureaucrats who supported it, and it now exists as a growing major
space project comparable to Apollo, the Space Shuttle, ISS, and SLS/Orion. Yet no president has ever officially and
publicly proposed the Lunar Gateway. No Congress ever reviewed or endorsed the program.
This NASA Experiment
Shows Promise for Farm-Fresh Foods in Space. On long space voyages, food variety will be key. A new NASA
experiment called Veg-PONDS 02, which astronauts just ran on the International Space Station, offers a chance to attain that
variety. While the experiment used a food already grown in space — romaine lettuce — future crops
could include tomatoes or other plants, NASA officials said in a statement.
The Editor says...
NASA is spending billions of dollars to solve problems that nobody has. Astronauts volunteer for dangerous
assignments, exchanging safety for fame. If the food is bland and monotonous, they don't care. Moreover,
there is no demand for the exploration of other planets, nor is any such mission authorized by the Constitution.
The only people pushing for a manned mission to Mars are NASA employees and contractors.
for SpaceX. Video footage of SpaceX's Crew Dragon space capsule exploding on the ground during an April 20
test at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida was leaked online by the next day. Yet SpaceX and NASA are unacceptably
dragging their feet in explaining this taxpayer-financed fiasco in the American space program and thus continued SpaceX's
worrisome undue influence on government. SpaceX's April 20 press release with its "anomaly" euphemism was immediately
contradicted by images provided by a photographer from a local Florida publication covering a surfing festival on a beach near
Cape Canaveral. In the telling photos, toxic reddish smoke clouds billow upwards from the space center. The accident
is a poor omen for the Crew Dragon, in which NASA wants to transport astronauts to the International Space Station (ISS).
NASA's Latest Figures Confirm Global Warming? The new paper uses the AIRS remote sensing instrument on NASA's Aqua satellite.
The study describes a 15-year dataset of global surface temperatures from that satellite sensor. The temperature trend value derived from
that data is +0.24 degrees Centigrade per decade, coming out on top as the warmest of climate analyses. Oddly, the study didn't compare
two other long-standing satellite datasets from the Remote Sensing Systems (RSS) and the University of Alabama at Huntsville (UAH). That's
an indication of the personal bias of co-author [Dr. Gavin] Schmidt, who in the past has repeatedly maligned the UAH dataset and its authors
because their findings didn't agree with his own GISTEMP dataset.
Have Now Declared War On Our Lawns. [Scroll down] "On balance, lawns are awful for the planet," Eric
Holthaus wrote last week in Grist, an environmentalist online magazine. "Our addiction to lawns means that grass is the
single largest irrigated agricultural 'crop' in America, more than corn, wheat, and fruit orchards combined," he adds.
"A NASA-led study in 2005 found that there were 63,000 square miles of turf grass in the United States, covering an area
larger than Georgia." Is there no end to the left's screeching sermons, its demands we "do better," the arrogance driven
by a sense of moral superiority that believes it can make decisions for others? While Holthaus admits lawns can be
"pleasing," "help reduce the urban heat island effect," "help restore groundwater and reduce urban flooding," and draw carbon
dioxide from the air, Grist is much more interested in dispatching a tirade.
The Editor says...
[#1] NASA obviously has nothing important to do. [#2] If the total area of all the lawns in the U.S. is greater
than the area of Georgia, that's surprisingly small, but no matter what the total is, the correct reaction is, So what?
What would the environmentalists prefer that we grow on our private property? Apparently the definition of "lawn" is an area of
grass near a residence that is mowed. Sure, I'd like to have a rain forest in my back yard, or a couple of 200-foot redwood trees,
but the lawn (which is mostly just closely-cropped weeds) will have to do.
Insight Mars Lander arrives on the Red Planet, ends successful journey. The InSight lander entered Mars'
atmosphere just shortly after 2:40 p.m. EST on Monday [11/26/2018] and touched the surface at approximately
2:54 p.m. EST. The last part of the journey was the most harrowing, with NASA calling it "seven minutes
of terror" due to the agency's inability to control the landing of the spacecraft, which cost $828 million.
of NASA's Mars Exploration Tools Has a Glitch That Created The Illusion of Water. We've arrived at a sad
realisation. A handful of pixels in about 90 percent of the images taken by one of the major instruments on NASA's Mars
Reconnaissance Orbiter are showing things that just aren't there. Researchers uncovered the error after searching for better
signs of moisture-absorbing materials on the Martian surface. Not only did they turn out to be a mirage, doubts have now
been raised over the precise distribution of water across the planet.
Joins Senate in Push to Extend International Space Station. A key House member announced Sept. 26 that he is
introducing legislation that would extend operations of the International Space Station to 2030, weeks after senators sought
a similar extension. In his opening statement at a House space subcommittee hearing on the past and future of NASA's
space exploration efforts, Rep. Brian Babin (R-Texas), chairman of the subcommittee, said he was introducing legislation
called the Leading Human Spaceflight Act that he said was designed to "provide further congressional direction to NASA."
may have used a lobbying firm to plant a scathing opinion piece about SpaceX in US news outlets. Boeing, the
102-year-old titan of the aerospace industry, is in a heated competition with SpaceX, Elon Musk's rocket company, for
billions of dollars in NASA contracts. As Boeing is seeking to secure that taxpayer funding — and the
prestige of launching astronauts into space — the company might be secretly placing an opinion article that
criticizes SpaceX in newspapers around the US. Both companies are trying to show NASA they can safely launch the agency's
astronauts to and from the International Space Station as part of NASA's Commercial Crew Program, a roughly $8 billion
competition the agency launched to spur private companies to build safe, cost-effective, American-made spaceships.
This is only slightly off-topic: 4
Pines Brewing Company creating world's first beer for space. Imagine if you could crack open an ice cold
brew... in space. "The story will one day be a space engineer walks into a bar and simply asks the question how would
you like to put your beer in space," Jaron Mitchell, the co-founder of 4 Pines Brewing Company, told FOX Business' Maria
Bartiromo during "Mornings with Maria" on Friday [9/7/2018]. 4 Pines has partnered with a space engineering firm to
create what it says is the perfect brew and bottle to be guzzled, for the first time ever, beyond the Earth's atmosphere.
Space exploration has typically been limited to astronauts, but it might not be long before tourists have a chance to travel
to outer space.
Emissions and the Environment. A recently released study by one set of scholars suggests that rocket launches
are having only minimal impact on the environment but that rapid growth of this sector — for all good and proper
reasons, creating American jobs as rockets are built and launches proliferate inside the U.S. — indicates advance
thinking. [...] More to the point, "solid rocket motors inject chlorine directly into the ozone layer and chlorine has been
subject to international regulation since 1987." Moreover, "a second concern has come to light," tied to particle
emissions from solids that affect solar energy. In short, solids are bad news in some ways, even if minimal for now
and unclear how bad, since we do not know how "tall" the problem will grow.
explores placing ads on rockets, allowing astronaut endorsements: report. A NASA spacecraft to Mars could
someday feature a Mars chocolate bar logo plastered across one of its wings. NASA has called for a new committee to
explore branding and endorsement opportunities, reports said Monday [9/10/2018]. NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine
announced he was setting up a committee to examine "provocative questions" of transforming rockets into corporate billboards,
much like how ads wrap all around NASCAR race cars, The Washington Post reported.
Space Station crew race to patch a 'leak' caused by a collision with a Meteorite. Crew inside the International
Space Station are racing to patch a 'leak' likely caused by a collision with a small meteorite, officials say. The
'micro fracture' in the $150 billion space station was discovered after astronauts noticed a drop in pressure.
This was caused by air from inside the ISS rapidly leaking out into space. [...] Officials say the crew is not currently
in any danger and will be able to patch the micro fracture from inside the space station.
The Editor says...
Any assertion that the astronauts are "not in any danger" is an intentionally misleading canard.
The astronauts have been in more danger than most of us since they climbed aboard a Russian rocket to
depart for the International Space Station. Fortunately the station got hit by a fairly small
particle this time.
is using underwater robots to explore the deep-sea off the Hawaiian coast. NASA is launching a new project to help it
better understand the deepest parts of space, without ever leaving Earth. The announcement, made on Tuesday [8/28/2018], is
part of the government space agency's Systematic Underwater Biogeochemical Science and Exploration Analog (SUBSEA) project and will
help aid NASA's search for life in deep space, as well as better understanding of our own planet. NASA believes the environment
around a deep-sea volcano off the coast of Hawaii is similar to that of Saturn's moon, Enceladus.
The Editor says...
It's the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. What does oceanography have to do with aeronautics and space,
and What part of the Constitution authorizes the exploration of the ocean floor?
discover water ice on moon's surface. Here's why that's big news. For the first time, scientists have
found what they say is definitive evidence of water ice on the surface of the moon. The discovery suggests that future
lunar expeditions might have a readily available source of water that would make it easier "to explore and even stay on the
moon," officials at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory said in a statement Tuesday about the discovery. The ice was
detected at the darkest, coldest regions of the moon's north and south poles. It exists in sparse patches in the north
and is concentrated in permanently shadowed craters in the south, where temperatures never climb above minus 250 degrees
The Editor says...
Ri-i-i-i-ight. Thirsty? Too bad we didn't bring enough water on this trip to the moon.
Well... just climb a few thousand feet down into this crater, and you'll find water. Oh, but it's
about 250 degrees below zero. Is that a problem?
Yes, we really do
need a 'Space Force'. When President Trump first floated the idea of an entirely new branch of the armed forces
dedicated to space-based operations, the response from political observers was limited to bemused snickering. That
mockery and amusement have not abated in the intervening months. Thursday's [8/9/2018] announcement by Vice President
Mike Pence and Secretary of Defense James Mattis that the administration plans to establish a sixth armed forces branch by
2020 occasioned only more displays of cynicism, but it shouldn't have. This is deadly serious stuff. The
expansion and consolidation of US capacities to defend its interests outside the atmosphere are inevitable and desirable.
Space Station Not Ready for Privatization. Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) has led the charge in the Senate on
protecting future funding sources for the space station past the current date for defunding it in 2025. The Office of
Management and Budget has zeroed out funding for the space station in the future on the promise from private vendors that
they will take over the U.S. mission at the space station, yet that does not make much sense. Private enterprise is in
the business of making money and if there is no business interest in the research done by the space station, they will just
not do it.
The Editor says...
What does that tell you? It is a white elephant money-losing project that isn't worth doing. The government
can't sell the space station to any private investor, because it isn't worth anything to a private company. It only
has value as a public relations tool for Big Government.
In Just One Week,
NASA Will Launch a Spacecraft to 'Touch the Sun'. NASA is just a week away from launching its next science
mission, a spacecraft called the Parker Solar Probe that will eventually "touch the sun." If all goes according to
plan, the probe will take off aboard a United Launch Alliance Delta IV Heavy rocket in the early morning of Aug. 11
from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida. [...] To successfully reach the sun, the Parker Solar Probe needs to
leave Earth incredibly quickly — hence the massive rocket, which is second in launch power only to SpaceX's
brand new Falcon Heavy rocket.
Is Right on Space Station. [Scroll down] Frank Slazer, vice president of space systems for the Aerospace
Industries Association, backed up the other point. "It will be very hard to turn ISS into a truly commercial outpost
because of the international agreements that the United States is involved in," Slazer told the Washington Post. "It's
inherently always going to be an international construct that requires U.S. government involvement and multinational cooperation."
Talking To Private Companies On Taking Over The International Space Station. NASA is putting together a
coalition of private companies that can run the International Space Station as a commercial space lab, The Washington Post
reports. The Trump administration plans on ending direct government funding of the ISS by 2025, according to documents
uncovered in February. The federal government spends about $3 billion to $4 billion a year to operate the ISS
and has sunk about $100 billion into the station, so far.
NOAA Set to Abandon Climate Change Mission. For decades, like NASA, NOAA has been a leading player in promoting
climate alarmism. As recently as the beginning of this year it was caught red-handed trying adjust the Big Freeze of
the winter of 2017/2018 in the U.S. out of existence. But that was just the tip of the iceberg. One of NOAA's
jobs is to maintain the United States Historical Climatology Network (USHCN), one of the world's major earth surface
temperature datasets. It has frequently been caught adjusting this data in order to make early 20th century
temperatures colder and recent temperatures hotter so as to give a more dramatic impression of "global warming."
could launch nuclear bombs into space to defend Earth from asteroids. Nasa and the National Nuclear Security
Administration have announced they are now working together on the possibility of destroying hazardous asteroids using
nuclear weapons. And like the film Armageddon — where Bruce Willis flies a space shuttle to an oncoming
asteroid to drill a warhead into its core — the nuclear payload could be delivered by rocket.
molecules 'fundamental to our search for life' found by NASA rover. NASA's Curiosity Mars rover has found
organic molecules on Mars, the space agency revealed in a major announcement Thursday [6/7/2018]. During a press
conference at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Goddard, Md., and NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif.,
scientists noted that the molecules provide fresh insight into the Red Planet. "We found organic molecules in rocks
from an ancient lake bed," explained Jen Eigenbrode, research scientist at Goddard. A variety of molecules were
identified, she added. The rocks are billions of years old, according to NASA.
The Editor says...
NASA is straining to find a few molecules of evidence that Mars might be habitable. In this case, the probe
found a little bit of methane, and NASA is now trying to infer far more than that which is reasonable. For one thing, Jupiter's
atmosphere contains methane, ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, and water, yet nobody suggests for a minute that there's life on Jupiter.
Think Climate Change Should Be NASA's Top Priority, Not Sending Astronauts to Mars. We chose to go the Moon
because it was hard, but it turns out difficulty might not be a compelling enough argument to sway Americans these
days. That's according to a new poll released by the Pew Research Center, a non-partisan polling group that studies a
range of fields including science and U.S. government policy. Perhaps the most interesting set of results came when the
researchers asked how NASA should prioritize the suite of tasks the agency oversees.
The Editor says...
Here's another option: How about not spending money on things we don't need, since we're 21 trillion
dollars in debt?
NASA scientist says Trump's climate change policy fills agency with 'fear and anxiety'. One former NASA
scientist is claiming that the agency's employees are crippled by the "fear and anxiety" brought on by the Trump
administration and its adamant denial of climate change. "Nasa's talking point is that it's business as usual, but
that's not true," former NASA science communicator, Laura Tenenbaum, told The Guardian. People inside the agency are
concerned Trump will cut climate science funding. There is a fear and anxiety there and the outcome has been chaos."
The climate change data and research meant for general public knowledge has come to a near halt under President Trump's
administration, Tenenbaum claimed, noting she received a warning to stay away from phrases like "global warming" when posting
on social media or speaking with the press. She said drafts of blog posts on coal plants becoming solar plants and
other "reasons to be positive about NASA" were thrown out by other officials who feared retribution from the new President.
The Editor says...
There is exactly the same amount of water on the Earth today as there was 5,000 years ago. There
could be places around the world where the government at some level has mismanaged the water supplies,
but that doesn't make wetlands wetter and dry regions drier.
Helicopter to Fly on NASA's Next Red Planet Rover Mission. The Mars Helicopter, a small, autonomous rotorcraft,
will travel with the agency's Mars 2020 rover mission, currently scheduled to launch in July 2020, to demonstrate the
viability and potential of heavier-than-air vehicles on the Red Planet. "NASA has a proud history of firsts," said NASA
Administrator Jim Bridenstine. "The idea of a helicopter flying the skies of another planet is thrilling. The
Mars Helicopter holds much promise for our future science, discovery, and exploration missions to Mars."
Omnibus Bill Ended Funding for NASA's Carbon Monitoring System. Science magazine reported this week that
funding for NASA's Carbon Monitoring System (CMS), which costs $10-million a year and is designed to measure greenhouse gas
emissions, was not included in the $1.3 trillion omnibus spending bill passed by Congress and signed into law by President
Trump in March, which in effect kills the program.
administration quietly cancels $10m NASA program that tracks key greenhouse gases. A $10 million per year NASA
program to track key global warming contributors carbon and methane has been canceled. The program called the Carbon Monitoring
System (CMS) was cut due to 'budget constraints and higher priorities within the science budget, a spokesperson for the space agency
said Thursday [5/10/2018]. A report from the journal Science called the shut down the latest move in a 'broad attack on climate
science' by the White House.
about sending humans to Mars — we need a permanent moon base instead. NASA's successful launch Saturday [5/5/2018]
of the InSight lander on an exploratory mission to Mars — costing taxpayers about $814 million — is just the latest
example of the long fascination people have had with the Red Planet. The lander will study earthquakes — make that
marsquakes — to learn more about our neighbor in the solar system.
The Editor says...
Neither the United States nor any other country needs a permanent base on the moon. This is a white elephant.
This sounds like an idea that originated from a military contractor or NASA bureaucrat. There is nothing to be gained
from such an outpost, and once again, there is nothing in the Constitution that authorizes such an expense.
Moreover, we don't need manned space flight at all.
NASA's epic first mission to the last planet. They called it the "first mission to the last planet." In
2006, a 224-foot-tall rocket lifted off from Cape Canaveral, Fla., carrying a tiny, thousand-pound probe named New Horizons.
Its mission: to wing its way across billions of miles of cold, dark space for a rendezvous with the solar system's most
distant planet, Pluto. The undertaking would finally close a chapter of space exploration, marking the last of the
Milky Way's planets to be probed.
NASA chief sees Moon missions building a 'railroad' to Mars. In his first major address as NASA administrator,
Jim Bridenstine defended the new agency directive to go to the moon first before voyaging to Mars. But his webcast
speech at the Humans to Mars summit in Washington, D.C., May 9 did not disclose any new initiatives by NASA to send humans to
the Red Planet. Bridenstine, the former Republican congressman from Oklahoma's 1st District, was sworn in as administrator
three weeks ago after NASA went 15 months without a permanent leader. While the agency was under interim leadership, the
Trump administration tasked NASA with taking humans back to the moon before going to Mars.
dismantles NASA climate change program. The Trump administration has cut off funding for a major NASA
satellite-based climate change research program, according to the latest issue of Science magazine. The magazine
reported that even though Congress has successfully fended off much of the White House's "broad attack on climate science," a
spending deal signed in March made no mention of NASA's $10-million-a-year Carbon Monitoring System. Unlike the satellites
that provide the climate data, the research program that uses the data had no private contractor to lobby for it.
launches historic InSight spacecraft with mission to Mars. NASA launched its InSight spacecraft bound for Mars on Saturday
morning [5/5/2018] from the Vandenberg Air Force Base in California, marking the first interplanetary mission ever to depart from the West
Coast. The spacecraft's trip will last approximately seven months and cover some 301 million miles, with arrival in the Elysium
Planitia region of the red planet in late November. According to NASA, it is "the first mission dedicated to understanding the internal
structure of Mars." [...] The $1 billion mission involves scientists from the U.S., France, Germany and elsewhere in Europe.
The Editor says...
This latest probe will dig into the Martian soil to look for clues about the origin of the planet, because the people at NASA obviously don't
believe the first chapter of the Bible which says that God made Mars and the Earth and everything else. This is even more puzzling because
it isn't necessary to dig up Martian soil samples to learn about that planet's origins. One could more easily dig into the Earth for the same
clues — again, assuming that the Bible can't be belived. But suppose this latest device lands in exactly the right spot, digs down ten feet,
and comes up with some pottery or a diamond ring or something. What then? Will we have to build a trillion dollars' worth of machines to
find the rest of it? On the other hand, suppose this billion-dollar project results in absolutely nothing new, which will almost certainly
be the case. Can we then, at long last, quit throwing away money on the exploration of Mars? How much more money will be thrown into
this blasphemous pit?
new planet finder is in space. Now what? Most everyone reading this story will probably know that a
SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket launched on Wednesday [4/18/2018] carrying a NASA spacecraft into orbit — the Transiting
Exoplanet Survey Satellite — that will further the space agency's mission of searching for exoplanets. [...] At a
cost of $200 million, the TESS spacecraft is about one-third the cost of the Kepler spacecraft, which had a main mirror with
a diameter of 0.95 meter. The TESS apertures are considerably smaller: 10cm for four identical cameras.
awards Lockheed Skunk Works $247.5M supersonic X-plane. Supersonic commercial air travel may once again become
a reality under a partnership between NASA and Lockheed Martin. The American space agency announced on Tuesday that it
awarded a contract to Lockheed Martin's Skunk Works to design, build and flight test the Low-Boom Flight Demonstrator (LBFD),
an X-plane that will be used by NASA to find ways to bring supersonic jet travel back to the skies. The
cost-plus-incentive-fee contract is valued at $247.5 million.
The Editor says...
If supersonic commercial air travel is economically feasible, that is, if there is sufficient demand for such a service,
the airlines should pay for the development of the aircraft.
The Concorde proved there is insufficient demand.
Therefore this $247 million project is either a cover story or a white elephant.
What's the Deal
with SpaceX, NOAA and Live Rocket Launch Video? Whenever SpaceX launches a rocket, you can bet the views will
be spectacular. After all, SpaceX has cameras up and down its Falcon 9 rockets that offer live views from space as each
booster soars into (and sometimes back from) space. So it was weird today (March 30) when, 9 minutes into an otherwise
routine Falcon 9 launch of 10 Iridium Next communications satellites from California's Vandenberg Air Force Base, SpaceX cut
the feed. The video blackout was intentional because of "restrictions" from a U.S. government agency known for its own
live views of Earth from space.
Considering Privatizing International Space Station. In what might be a turning point for the International
Space Station, the Trump administration is considering privatizing the orbiting satellite in the near future. According
to The Washington Post, the Trump administration does not plan on allocating funds for the ISS after 2024, which will
effectively end direct federal support for the station.
to Privatize the International Space Station. The Trump administration is going to think about thinking about
considering ending federal funding for the International Space Station (ISS) in 2025. Cue a bunch of people freaking out
about the prospect of space station privatization. Before we get into the nitty girtty — a note:
if I had a nickel for every major goal set by an American president for the space program with a time horizon of 6 to
20 years, I'd have enough money to continue funding the ISS well past 2025. Every administration comes up
with its own blueprint/roadmap/guidebook to go to the moon/Mars/Alpha Centauri with all of the major deadlines conveniently
kicking in long after the relevant president is somewhere on a yacht moored outside his presidential library.
These plans rarely come to fruition, and even incremental steps are frequently reversed.
Insight Lander Spreads Its Solar Wings. May 2018 is the launch window for NASA's next mission to Mars, the
InSight Lander. InSight is the next member of what could be called a fleet of human vehicles destined for Mars.
But rather than working on the question of Martian habitability or suitability for life, InSight will try to understand the
deeper structure of Mars. InSight stands for Interior Exploration using Seismic Investigations, Geodesy and Heat
Transport. InSight will be the first robotic explorer to visit Mars and study the red planet's deep interior.
The Editor says...
How many U.S. taxpayers care about the deep interior of Mars? Maybe one in a million? And most of them work for NASA, I presume.
NASA has a web page about this project that will tell you everything
(positive) there is to know, without mentioning the cost. As if the cost is immaterial.
dust could help life jump from planet to planet. It may not take an asteroid strike to transport life from one
planet to another. Fast-moving dust could theoretically knock microbes floating high up in a world's atmosphere out
into space, potentially sending the bugs on a trip to another planet — perhaps even one orbiting a different star,
according to a new study.
The Editor says...
It takes far more faith to believe this idea than to believe in the six-day creation described in the Bible. In order for dust particles,
microbes, rocks, or anything else to leave the gravitational field of a planet, those objects must reach escape velocity. There
is no mechanism in place to hurl dust into space at speeds greater than the escape velocity of this planet, or even a planet with no atmosphere.
The Editor says...
We the taxpayers spent $4 billion to study "the potential habitability of Saturn's moons?"
How will that improve the lives of anyone outside of NASA?
Trump Appoints New NASA Chief. All the right people are complaining about President Trump's new NASA chief Jim
Bridenstine, who once demanded an apology from Obama for squandering money on climate research.
mess with Yellowstone supervolcano' NASA slammed by park geologists over risky plan. A geologist at the
national park said the proposal could have dire consequences, including killing scores of animals. The warning comes
after the US space agency revealed its options to prevent the volcano from exploding, including drilling into the bottom to
release heat from it. Fears were immediately raised the "risky" plan could actually backfire and trigger an
eruption — potentially triggering a deadly nuclear winter.
wants to prevent the Yellowstone super volcano from destroying the US. There are about 20 known super volcanoes
on Earth, NASA says. A major eruption occurs about once every 100,000 years. And these odds are much higher than
a repeat of an Earth-changing comet impact of the type that wiped out the dinosaurs. So NASA tasked a team with
figuring out how to prevent one.
The Editor says...
What does this have to do with aeronautics and space? Has there ever been a volcanic eruption that was prevented?
is hiring a 'planetary protection officer' to guard us against alien life — and vice versa. There's
a vacancy at NASA, and it may have one of the greatest job titles ever conceived: planetary protection officer. It pays
well, between $124,000 and $187,000 annually. You get to work with really smart people as part of the three- to five-year
appointment but don't have to manage anyone. And your work could stave off an alien invasion of Earth or, more important,
protect other planets from us. President Trump has expressed bullish enthusiasm for America's space program, signing an
executive order last month resurrecting the National Space Council, on hiatus since the 1990s, and gleefully discussing the
prospect of sending people to Mars. His proposed budget for NASA seeks a slight funding reduction overall, though he
wants to realign spending to focus on "deep space exploration rather than Earth-centric research," as The Washington Post
reported in March.
over the surface of Pluto in stunning NASA video. Now, the space agency has released breathtaking flyover
videos using the New Horizons data and digital elevation models, revealing a close-up look at everything from ominous craters
of Pluto's 'Cthulhu Macula,' to the bizarre 'moated mountains' on its largest moon, Charon. In recognition of the
two-year anniversary of New Horizons' Pluto flyby, NASA also revealed a stunning set of global elevation maps, showing the
complex terrain of Pluto and Charon.
The Editor says...
How much did this cost, and who — outside of NASA — will benefit from this?
NASA Chief Scientist: America is "Under Siege" from Climate Disinformers. The science is NOT unequivocal
that we face a climate emergency. Using the IPCC's own climate figures, there is a real possibility anthropogenic CO2
is not a big deal. Calling people who point this out purveyors of "fake news" is pure climate alarmism. As for
what happens after the year 2100, frankly that is their problem. By the year 2100 humanity will know whether CO2 is
causing climate problems — and will have the energy supply options and advanced engineering capabilities to deal
with any eventuality.
unveils six-wheeled Mars rover complete with full laboratory and life support systems. Nasa has unveiled a new
Mars rover concept vehicle designed to function "as both a working vehicle and laboratory" for the next generation of space
explorers. The 8.5-metre vehicle would not look out of place in a science-fiction film. It features six huge
wheels to allow it to travel over craters, dunes and rocks, a sloping front reminiscent of the Nolan-era Batmobile and solar
panels to power everything.
Worst Plan Yet. In the early months of the Trump administration, some lunar advocates spread the rumor that the
new president would seek a return to the Moon within his first four years, thereby dramatically making America great again in
space. That is not the plan. Nor is the plan to send humans to Mars within eight years, something that I think we
could achieve. Nor is it to send human missions to explore near-Earth asteroids, as then President Obama suggested in
2010, nor is it even to send humans to a piece of an asteroid brought back from deep space to lunar orbit for study, as
called for in the ARM. No, instead NASA is proposing to build a space station in lunar orbit. This proposal is notable
for requiring a large budget to create an object with no utility whatsoever.
U.S. Air Force Space Plane Lands After Secret, Two-Year Mission. The U.S. military's experimental X-37B space
plane landed on Sunday at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida, completing a classified mission that lasted nearly two years,
the Air Force said. The unmanned X-37B, which resembles a miniature space shuttle, touched down at 7:47 a.m.
EDT on a runway formerly used for landings of the now-mothballed space shuttles, the Air Force said in an email.
can sue over NASA's sting operation on her. A 75-year-old widow in tough financial straits reached out to NASA
about selling a speck of moon rock her late husband had given her. Joann Davis then became the target of a sting
operation at a Denny's that a federal appeals court suggested Thursday was outrageous overkill. The lead agent
"organized a sting operation involving six armed officers to forcibly seize a Lucite paperweight containing a moon rock the
size of a rice grain from an elderly grandmother," wrote Judge Sidney Thomas of the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals in the
decision allowing Davis to sue, per the Los Angeles Times. [...] Agents also forcibly restrained her second husband, who had
accompanied her to the supposed sale. Davis' first husband, Robert, worked as an Apollo 11 engineer, and he saved a
paperweight with moon material and another with a bit of the heat shield.
Solar wind stripped Martian atmosphere away.
Solar wind and radiation are responsible for stripping the Martian atmosphere, transforming Mars from a planet that could have supported life
billions of years ago into a frigid desert world, according to new results from NASA's MAVEN (Mars Atmosphere and Volatile Evolution Mission)
spacecraft led by the University of Colorado Boulder. "We've determined that most of the gas ever present in the Mars atmosphere has been
lost to space," said Bruce Jakosky, principal investigator for MAVEN and a professor at the Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics (LASP).
The Editor says...
This may be the least plausible work of science fiction I've ever heard, and, with a price tag
of $452.9 million, it is also the most
expensive. If what they say is true, then why do Venus and Earth — which are much closer to the Sun — still have
their atmospheres and oceans intact? What NASA is saying, with a great deal of desperation, is that it is impossible to believe that Mars
was created just the way it is. Believing the first chapter of the Bible is much easier than believing that "solar wind" blew the
atmosphere completely off Mars, and affected Mars exclusively.
This is exactly what President Hillary Clinton would have done. President
Trump's Proposed OMB Budget. The President's 2018 Budget [...] Provides $3.7 billion for continued development
of the Orion crew vehicle, Space Launch System, and associated ground system, to send American astronauts on deep-space missions.
To accommodate increasing development costs, the Budget cancels the multi-billion-dollar Asteroid Redirect Mission.
renews NASA mission for human space travel, deep space exploration. President Trump put NASA on course for deep
space exploration Tuesday [3/21/2017], signing a bill that authorizes $19.5 billion in funding to revive the agency's manned-space flight
program and plan missions to Mars and beyond. Mr. Trump spoke of the renewal of NASA's mission, including development of new
spacecraft and preparation for a mars mission, in historic terms. "Almost half a century ago our brave astronauts first planted the
American flag on the moon. That was a big moment in our history," he said at an Oval Office signing ceremony. "Now this nation
is ready to be the first in space once again. Today we are taking the initial steps toward a bold and bright new future of American
wants to make space exploration great again. President Trump peeled back the curtain on his plans for the US
space program on Tuesday — singing a sweeping NASA policy bill into effect and reaffirming the agency's commitment
to human exploration and putting a man on Mars. "For almost six decades NASA's work has inspired millions and millions
of Americans to imagine distant worlds and a better future right here on Earth," Trump explained during the signing, which
was attended by astronauts, lawmakers and scientists.
Anybody Else NOT Surprised That NASA Making an Announcement Days after Defunding? NASA never fully recovered
after the Apollo program. To be fair, it hasn't always been NASA's fault. The agency is constantly the victim of
politics.Yet they managed to struggle their way through the shuttle program, the International Space Station, and many
different science projects including telescopes, and probes — every one of them costing millions more than
budgeted due to technical errors, and accidents. Currently the Juno probe is having engine trouble and is indefinitely
stuck in orbit around Jupiter and their heavy-lift rocket motor is plagued with problems[.] Worse yet, the agency has
become another tentacle in the Democrat agenda in attempts to make the case of global warming.
List of Ridiculous Spending Items By Obama Administration. NASA spent $124,955 to develop pizza that can be
printed on a 3-D printer. It already pays Lockheed Martin $1 million a year to develop food for a Mars mission
that isn't happening for several decades. The space agency also spent $390,000 to develop a "green ninja" cartoon
character to promote climate change, $360,000 on "pillownauts" that lay in bed for 70 days and $3 million on a
mission to study the inner workings of Congress.
is NASA is Exploring an Alien World in Antarctica? Mount Erebus is at the end of our world — and
offers a portal to another. Covered in ice and filled with bubbling lava, the massive volcano rising 12,448 feet
(3,794 meters) above Ross Island in Antarctica is the perfect proxy for an alien world, which is why NASA's Aaron Curtis,
who joined JPL's Extreme Environments Robotics Group in 2016, travels there to test space exploration robots.
Has the Cold War started up again? NASA,
heeding Trump, may add astronauts to a test flight moon mission. President Trump has indicated that he wants to
make a splash in space. During his transition, he spoke with historian Douglas Brinkley about John F. Kennedy's famous
1961 vow to go to the moon before the decade was out. Now Trump and his aides may do something very similar: demand
that NASA send astronauts to orbit the moon before the end of Trump's first term — a move that one Trump adviser said
would be a clear signal to the Chinese that the U.S. intends to retain dominance in space.
Religion About Extraterrestrials. [Scroll down to page 58] "How might the world's religions respond to the discovery of life on other
planets?" NASA is enlisting theologians to answer that question to prepare for if and when human contact is made with extraterrestrials. The
NASA Astrobiology Program awarded more than $1.1 million to the Center of Theological Inquiry (CTI) to examine "the societal implications of the
search for life in the universe."
to explore asteroid made of $10,000 quadrillion worth of metal. NASA recently announced it's latest endeavor: Explore a
giant metal asteroid the size of Massachusetts. Made up of mostly nickel and iron, the giant hunk of space metal is about three times
further away from the Sun than Earth. Enticingly, the mission's lead scientist has put a price tag of $10,000 quadrillion on the asteroid,
known as "16 Psyche."
The Editor says...
The metal may be worth a lot of money — nickel is about $10,000 per ton — but even at that price, the transportation costs would be prohibitive.
Moreover, there would be considerable costs involved in sending robots out there to do the assaying — autonomously. If we need nickel that badly, perhaps the government
should stop creating "national monuments" that prevent mining in the western U.S. Nice try, NASA. Keep searching for a reason to exist, and do it quickly, because
there's a new president now who was sent to Washington to cut wasteful spending.
next stop — Mars or the Moon? [W]ith NASA's limited funds, even before possible cuts under a Trump
administration, the space agency can't do both. Sending astronauts to the Moon and establishing a colony would push
human exploration of Mars into the second half of this century. Alternatively, making a direct push toward Mars would
preclude any meaningful human exploration of the Moon. A choice must be made.
The Editor says...
There is a third option: Stay home and stop spending borrowed money on pointless boondoggles. And a fourth option:
if you really want samples of lifeless dirt from another planet, send a machine to get them and return them to Earth.
NASA Great Again. In 1962, at the height of the Cold War, space was important and worthy of such risk. We
were going to the moon to demonstrate our technological superiority to the Soviets and the world, and Glenn's flight was a crucial
milestone on that path. Half a century later, that sense of importance — and the willingness to take risks that came
with it — has been lost.
America to glory: Retake U.S. space lead. For a couple of decades now, I have been writing that the
manned and unmanned space programs of the United States have to be, first, in the best interests of the national security of
our nation and, second, never wasteful of the American tax dollar. In full disclosure, I say this as one who has no
interest in being part of the Trump transition team, being part of the Trump administration, or having any access whatsoever
to those who do. None. I say this only as an American who for years has been deeply concerned that the Obama
administration has systematically ceded control of space to the People's Republic of China and Russia and, in the process,
has greatly endangered the national security of our nation.
The Editor says...
If manned space flight is a matter of national defense, it should be undertaken by the Air Force. All other defense-related activity
in space should be done by the Air Force and the Army. NASA is all about the exploration of other planets and the operation of
various scientific research projects that have more to do with atmospheric science (i.e., global warming) than national defense.
was neutered, turned into political PR machine, and Trump is going to fix that. In the last 20 years NASA has
been turned from a space agency to one that ignores satellite data in favour of doing statistical tricks with badly placed
ground thermometers and relies on Russia to do things in space. Former NASA stars have been protesting for year at the
dismal standards in NASA climate research. The same guys who walked on the moon, worked on the Apollo missions, and ran
the shuttle program were fed up with NASA's excellent brand name being exploited by junk scientists to do political
promotions. Under Obama NASA was told to do three things — inspire kids, help international relationships
and help Muslim nations "feel good". So much for space exploration and science.
Trump expected to slash Nasa's climate change budget in favour of sending humans back to the moon — and
beyond. US President-elect Donald Trump is set to slash Nasa's budget for monitoring climate change and instead
set a goal of sending humans to the edge of the solar system by the end of the century, and possibly back to the moon.
Mr Trump, who has called climate change a "Chinese hoax", is believed to want to focus the agency on far-reaching, big banner
goals in deep space rather than "Earth-centric climate change spending". According to Bob Walker, who has advised Mr Trump
on space policy, Nasa has been reduced to "a logistics agency concentrating on space station resupply and politically correct
The Editor says...
Climate science is what NOAA is for — not NASA.
AT&T And NASA To Build National
Drone Tracking System. AT&T and NASA aren't the only ones trying to regulate the skies. In September,
DARPA announced the Aerial Dragnet program, requesting proposals for technology that would allow the government to keep track
of all objects flying below 1,000 feet. The agency initially envisioned their system relying on a network of
tower- or drone-mounted "surveillance nodes" scattered throughout cities.
NASA in talks with Russian
space agency over joint mission to Venus - report. The US and Russia may join efforts in exploring the second
planet from the Sun, as NASA and Russian space agency Roscosmos are discussing a joint mission to Venus, Russian media
reports. NASA has already drawn up a number of scenarios for the joint mission with their Russian counterparts to
Venus, director of the Space Research Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences Lev Zeleny told the Izvestiya daily.
The Editor says...
Like everything NASA now undertakes, this mission to Venus is pointless. How will this benefit anyone without connections to NASA?
Is Restarting the Mars Program He Canceled 8 Years Ago. President Barack Obama will restart NASA's mission to
Mars after he effectively canceled the program eight years ago, according to an op-ed he wrote. Obama's op-ed calls for
NASA to send humans to Mars by 2030, but Obama has a long history of slashing programs that would have sent America to Mars
Vows Mars Mission Even as He Cuts NASA's Budget. [Scroll down] Of course, Obama forgets to mention in the
piece that, memories of grandpa and astronauts being fished out of the sea near Hawaii aside, he proposed earlier this year
significantly cutting the funding for space exploration so he could pursue all his various earthbound social welfare and
X-37B Space Plane Mystery Mission Wings by 500 Days in Orbit. The U.S. military launched the robotic X-37B
space plane on May 20, 2015, marking the fourth flight for the Air Force program. A United Launch Alliance Atlas V
rocket lofted the spacecraft from Florida's Cape Canaveral Air Force Station to kick off the OTV-4 mission (short for Orbital
Test Vehicle-4). Exactly what the winged space plane's duties are while it's in orbit continues to remain a tight-lipped
affair. Similarly, how long the vehicle will remain in orbit has not been detailed.
[is] Helping U.S. Lose a New, Dangerous Space Race to Red China. President Barack Obama's anti-space
exploration policies have created a vacuum that's being filled by China, bemoaned lawmakers on both sides of the aisle during
a congressional hearing Tuesday [9/27/2016]. China is catching up to the space programs of NASA and the U.S. military,
according to expert witnesses at the hearing, causing Republicans and Democrats to blame Obama for delays and funding
cuts. "All of [NASA's] success came to a screeching halt when President Obama was sworn in," Texas Republican
Rep. Brian Babin, chairman of the House Subcommittee on Space, said during the hearing. "His fiscal year 2010
budget request slashed well over a billion dollars from the exploration project and budget... China has capitalized on this
The Editor says...
How is this a dangerous space race, and what is at risk here? What have we lost if some other country sends a (most likely) suicidal mission
to Mars to collect samples of frozen-over sterile dirt? How are we worse off if some other country sends astronauts to the Moon? If the next
person to walk on the Moon is from a Communist country, how does that do us any harm? The ugly reality is this: We don't have the money for
fruitless science projects.
is going to an asteroid, and it wants your help. NASA is seeking research partners for its ambitious asteroid
redirect mission, the space agency recently announced. The asteroid mission sounds like science fiction. In
December 2021, NASA plans to launch a robotic mission that will travel to an asteroid, grab a multiton boulder off its
surface, bring it back — and then put it in orbit around the moon. The space agency says they've already
identified four asteroid candidates. After that, with a launch in 2026, astronauts will travel to the asteroid and
research it, bringing back samples to Earth.
The Editor says...
Somehow the writer neglected to mention the cost of this project, or the benefit it will bring to the average taxpayer.
Private Moon Mission
Gets Go-Ahead From U.S. Government. A small startup is to become the first private company to receive
permission from the U.S. government to land a craft on the moon. [...] On Wednesday [8/3/2016], Moon Express announced on its
website that it had become the first private enterprise to be granted permission to land a robotic spacecraft on the Moon's
surface, following discussions with the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA), the U.S. State Department, NASA and other federal
The Editor says...
Since when do you need permission from the FAA or NASA (or anyone else) to go to the moon? What's the penalty for landing
on the moon without permission? When was that law enacted?
NASA still believes we might find life on Mars. The day Gil Levin says he detected life on Mars, he was waiting
in his lab at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, watching a piece of paper inch out of a printer. Levin snatched the
sheet and scrutinized the freshly inked graph. A thin line measuring radioactive carbon crept steadily upward, just as
it always did when Levin performed the test with microbes on Earth. But this data came from tens of millions of miles
away, where NASA's Viking lander was — for the first time in history — conducting an experiment on the
surface of Mars. "Gil, that's life," his co-investigator, Patricia Straat, exclaimed when she saw the first results
come in. There was jubilation at JPL. [...] It was July 30, 1976. Forty years later, Levin and Straat still
believe that their experiment was evidence of microbiotic Martians. But few people agree with them.
next Mars rover will 'seek the signs of life' on red planet. NASA gave a glimpse into its plans for its next
Martian rover on Friday [7/15/2016], a craft that will focus on looking for evidence of life on the red planet and preparing
samples for possible return to Earth someday. The still-unnamed rover will launch in the summer of 2020 (so the space
agency is calling the program Mars 2020) and will arrive at its destination in February of 2021.
$73,500 on 'Unconscious Bias' Training. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration is spending at least
$73,500 to teach astronauts about diversity, their "unconscious biases," and how to "use their privilege." NASA is
adding a new curriculum to its "Diversity Dialogue Project," and has hired a contractor to hold "regularly scheduled dialogue
sessions" about inclusion. The program is designed for employees to "engage in a facilitated dialogue process in an
"open, non-judgmental and comfortable environment," according to documents released by the agency.
NASA is really good at finding solutions for which there is no problem. NASA Unveils Plans for Electric-Powered
Plane. A new experimental airplane being built by NASA could help push electric-powered aviation from a technical curiosity and
pipe dream into something that might become commercially viable for small aircraft. At a conference on Friday [6/17/2016] of the American
Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics in Washington, Charles F. Bolden Jr., the NASA administrator, announced plans for an all-electric
airplane designated as X-57, part of the agency's efforts to make aviation more efficient and less of a polluter. "The X-57 will take the
first giant step in opening a new era of aviation," Mr. Bolden declared.
Hopes to Reach Mars by 2030s, With Israel's Help, Space Agency's Administrator Says. NASA hopes to reach Mars
in the 2030s, NASA Administrator Charles Bolden said, adding that the U.S. space agency looks forward to working with Israel,
whose "incredibly innovative people on the cutting edge of technology" can help NASA successfully launch the first human
voyage to the red planet. Bolden's lecture was attended by a packed audience at Bar-Ilan University Monday morning
[6/6/2016]. On Tuesday evening, the university will present Bolden with an honorary doctorate. During his visit to
Israel, Bolden will meet with representatives of the Israel Space Agency to discuss the 250 experiments taking place during
every six-month expedition on the International Space Station. "We are excited about ongoing relations with the Israel
Space Agency and what we can do together on the International Space Station," Bolden said.
The Editor says...
Nobody outside of NASA or Roscosmos benefits from the existence of the International Space Station, and
its purpose — basic scientific research — is not authorized by the Constitution.
The United States should sell its interest in the space station to the Russians, and let them waste money on it.
struggles to inflate space 'bounce house'. NASA's attempts to inflate a unique new module on the International
Space Station have stopped for today, the space agency announced this morning [5/26/2016], because the module only inflated
"a few inches." The new module, called BEAM, was supposed to be expanded early this morning. But NASA announced
that the operation did not go as planned.
to officially unveil its green rocket fuel project in Colorado this week. Since 2012, the folks over at NASA
have been working on developing a high performance "green" rocket propellant it hoped to one day use as an alternative to the
incredibly toxic hydrazine fuel currently in use. According to a press release published in August of 2012, the
Washington D.C.-based space agency selected Boulder, Colorado's Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corporation to research the
fuel alternative and as of this month, it appears it's ready to show off its work. In an invite sent to media outlets late
last week, Ball Aerospace will officially open its doors on March 31 to unveil NASA's Green Propulsion Infusion Mission.
Why Congress Says Obama Has Wrecked NASA. Lawmakers grilled National Aeronautics and Space Administration
(NASA) Administrator Charlie Bolden during a Thursday [3/17/2016] congressional hearing on President Barack Obama's 2017
budget plan. Republicans argued the budget hurts the space agency by diverting more money into global warming research.
NASA's budget proposal is far more concerned with spending on global warming research than supporting the agency's mission of
space exploration, according to Republican lawmakers.
moon could have been home to subsurface ocean. Pluto's largest moon Charon may have once had a subsurface ocean that long ago
became frozen and expanded. As a result, the expanding ocean that was identified through images from NASA's New Horizons mission may have
pushed out the moon's surface — causing it to stretch and fracture on a massive scale, NASA said. The side of Charon viewed by
the passing New Horizons spacecraft in July 2015 is characterized by a system of "pull apart" tectonic faults, which are expressed as ridges,
scarps and valleys — the latter sometimes reaching more than 4 miles deep.
The Editor says...
Given that the average temperature of Pluto is 44° Kelvin, it is unlikely (to say the least) that anything resembling an "ocean"
has ever existed there, inasmuch as there are very few substances that are liquids at those temperatures. Even ordinary air is a solid
at that temperature, and in the absence of atmospheric pressure, liquid air would boil away into space. NASA says there might
have been an ocean there years ago, but anyone who paid attention in high school can see it's impossible.
wants to unlock the universe's secrets with telescope more powerful than Hubble. NASA has unveiled plans for a
powerful new telescope with a view more than 100 times wider than Hubble. The Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope
(WFIRST) is designed to help researchers unravel the secrets of dark energy and dark matter, and explore the evolution of the
universe, according to NASA. "It also will discover new worlds outside our solar system and advance the search for worlds
that could be suitable for life," explained the space agency, in a statement released Thursday [2/18/2016].
The Editor says...
There is no mention of the pricetag for this telescope on NASA's web page, which explains every other aspect of the project in detail.
Wikipedia indicates that the total cost will be somewhere around two billion dollars.
find evidence of gravitational waves predicted by Einstein. After decades of searching, scientists announced Thursday [2/11/2016] that they
have detected gravitational waves — essentially ripples in the fabric of space-time — that had been predicted by Einstein.
An international team of astrophysicists said that they detected the waves from the distant crash of two black holes, using a $1.1 billion instrument.
The Editor says...
How are you any better off, knowing that another of Einstein's theories was allegedly proven? Is 1.1 billion dollars a negligible amount now?
Moon or Mars? NASA must pick 1 goal for astronauts, experts tell Congress. NASA can't afford to put humans on Mars while also pursuing missions
to put astronauts back on the moon, according to a panel of experts who testified to the U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee on Space Wednesday [2/10/2016].
"Today the future of NASA's human spaceflight program is far from clear," said Tom Young, former director of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center. "There
has been continual debate about should we go to the moon or Mars or both ... It is clear, again, that we cannot do both. And there is a need to focus our
attention, capability and resources on one option."
The Editor says...
NASA is currently flying around in circles, and now somebody at NASA thinks that the Moon is a stepping stone to Mars. It was already demonstrated, in the
early 1970's, that the Moon is a mass of lifeless sand and rocks. As I have said before, if the Moon were made of uranium, it still would be economically
infeasible to send astronauts there. The same is true — and perhaps even more true — of Mars. It is not by any means an imperative
national priority to send men to Mars. It is only an instrument NASA is using to extend its own existence.
House proposes $19 billion NASA budget. The Obama Administration's final budget request, released Feb. 9, offers
$19 billion for NASA in fiscal year 2017, a decrease of $300 million from the agency's final 2016 budget. The budget,
as proposed, would shift some funds from NASA's exploration programs to aeronautics and space technology, in addition to the overall
cuts, while also shifting funds within the agency's science account. The budget request is likely to face strong opposition in
Congress, where House and Senate leaders have already said that the administration's overall budget request will be considered dead
Will Return to the Moon in Preparation for Human Mars Mission. Project managers from Lockheed Martin and NASA gathered last
week at Kennedy Space Center in Florida to usher in the return of the Orion crew module and to discuss future missions that will see humans
travel beyond low-Earth orbit for the first time since Apollo 17 in 1972. Development of the Orion spacecraft will now be
ramping up in preparation for Exploration Mission 1 — the module's first journey to the Moon and into deep space.
This feat will act as a dress rehearsal for a crewed asteroid retrieval mission in lunar orbit and be a major stepping stone for NASA's
manned mission to Mars.
NASA Bans The Word 'Jesus'. The name of Jesus is not welcome in the
Johnson Space Center newsletter, according to a complaint filed on behalf of a group of Christians who work for NASA. The JSC Praise & Worship Club was directed by NASA attorneys
to refrain from using the name 'Jesus' in club announcements that appeared in a Space Center newsletter. "It was shocking to all of us and very frustrating," NASA engineer Sophia
Smith told me. "NASA has a long history of respecting religious speech. Why wouldn't they allow us to put the name Jesus in the announcement about our club?" Liberty
Institute, one of the nation's largest religious liberty law firms, threatened to file a federal lawsuit unless NASA apologizes and stops censoring the name 'Jesus'.
The Space Shuttle's Last Launch. The
infrastructure behind NASA's shuttle program was unimaginably vast. At $1 billion each, the launches were so audacious that they seemed
to risk collapsing under the weight of their own hubris. And yet, for 30 years the orbiters came and went, acting as a protective vessel,
enabling a select group to contemplate the fury of the world in a stillness unobtainable by the rest of us. Then in early 2011, the space
shuttle program came to an end.
The Editor says...
I don't share this writer's nostalgia, but it is interesting that he says the Shuttle launches cost $1 billion apiece.
Obama Official Who Pled Guilty to Espionage Gets... $250 Fine. Glenn Woodell, a NASA supervisor who pled guilty
to violating U.S. espionage laws involving a Chinese NASA contractor was given a slap on the wrist with six months' probation
and a $250 fine, the Daily Caller News Foundation has learned. Daniel Jobson, a Woodell colleague and fellow NASA supervisor,
had his espionage charges reduced to a misdemeanor and was released without any penalty. The lenient plea deals were
quietly delivered October 26 in U.S. District Court in Newport News, Virginia. The U.S. Attorneys office did not
to [sic] issue a press release about the deals and declined comment when contacted by the DCNF.
Government Funding of Basic Science? Knock It
Off. For decades now, even free-market economists have argued that the government should fund basic scientific
research. I myself have always felt suspicious of the argument — this is one reason I remain skeptical of NASA,
despite the ridicule of my comrades Rob Long and James Lileks, who can barely contain their pleasure at the thought of spending
untold sums to send someone to Mars — but I confess that I've never possessed the analytical skills to investigate
the argument, let alone refute it.
Shows Strong Signs of Flowing Water, Researchers Say. A new study provides the "strongest evidence yet" that
salty liquid water sometimes flows on modern-day Mars, researchers said on Monday [9/28/2015] in a discovery that holds implications
for future expeditions to the Red Planet. "Our quest on Mars has been to 'follow the water' in our search for life in the
universe, and now we have convincing science that validates what we've long suspected," said John Grunsfeld, associate
administrator at NASA's Science Mission Directorate in Washington, D.C. "This is a significant development, as it
appears to confirm that water — albeit briny — is flowing today on the surface of Mars."
Found on Mars Could Be First Signs of Martian Life. Mars is drier than the driest desert on Earth: It has no
lakes, oceans, or rivers, and its atmosphere has at best tiny traces of water vapor. However, Mars used to be much wetter. We
can see signs of long-gone lakes and riverbeds, though it's unlikely the planet was ever warm enough to be a lush, damp place like Earth
is. The disappearance of Mars' surface water is one of the mysteries we still have to solve. However, we've suspected water
can sometimes flow on Mars for a while. The various orbiting Mars-mapping probes have spotted small landslides along slopes that
appeared between orbital passes, which could be caused by water, but are more likely to be the result of more boring geological processes.
The Editor says...
The assertion that "Mars used to be much wetter" is highly speculative.
Has Water: Why NASA Discovery Matters. Traces of liquid water have been found on Mars, NASA said today
[9/28/2015], raising questions about the possibility of life on the Red Planet. Dark, 100-meter-long streaks flowing
downhill on Mars are believed to have been formed by contemporary flowing water, according to NASA. The findings come from
NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter and raise the possibility there could be life — or even microbes —
living inside the Red Planet. [...] While today's discovery is huge, it is small compared to the rivers, lakes and vast
oceans that are believed to have flowed on Mars billions of years ago.
The Editor says...
What happened on Mars "billions of years ago" — if anything — is idle speculation.
The announcement of water "flowing" on Mars — without clouds or rain — water originating
from nowhere, accumulating nowhere, visible from an orbiting spacecraft, and "flowing" in sub-zero temperatures,
is way beyond dubious. But it's NASA's satellite orbiting Mars, so when they announce a "discovery," the
poorly-educated public is expected to take their word for it. Apparently NASA believes that if we all keep chanting "life on Mars"
long enough, eventually that will make it come true. Much of this "water on Mars" story depends on what the meaning of "water" is.
The the average recorded temperature on Mars is -81° F.
Even a river of ethylene glycol would have a hard time "flowing" in that weather. Besides the low
temperature, there's the near-zero atmospheric pressure to consider (and NASA hopes you don't). The atmospheric pressure on Mars
is about 0.087 psi — the same as the pressure at
about 117,000 feet above the Earth's surface. With an average temperature well below zero,
water exists only as ice, and at near-zero ambient pressure even ice will dissipate due to sublimation,
unless the ambient temperature is too low. There is no water flowing on Mars.
reports flowing water on Mars. But how? A U.S. satellite, the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, has found
evidence there of water, the foundation of life. Actually, flowing water from as recently as a year ago. Observers, of
course, have known of vast quantities of water locked within Mars' polar ice caps. But water elsewhere? Flowing?
On a surface ranging from about 80 degrees to minus 190?
The Editor continues...
Water is not the foundation of life. God himself is the foundation of life. If this alleged liquid on Mars can run downhill in sub-zero temperatures, it's something other than pure water.
Even if the temperature occasionally went above 32°F., when exposed to near-zero atmospheric pressure the water would boil immediately.
Is exploring Mars worth the investment? It's hard to calculate a total price tag, but over the 48 years that
NASA has been launching missions to Mars, Americans have spent a significant sum. The Viking missions alone cost nearly
$1 billion — in 1970s dollars. The twin rovers Spirit and Opportunity cost a total of about
$1 billion to build and operate as well. Curiosity, as the Mars Science Laboratory rover is known, is over budget
at $2.5 billion.
Notice that the LA Times calls it an investment, not an expense.
Cost of NASA's Next Mars Rover Hits Nearly $2.5
Billion. NASA's Mars Science Laboratory mission needs an $82 million cash infusion to maintain its late
November launch date after development of the $2.47 billion rover exhausted program funding reserves last year,
according to agency officials.
Has NASA Become Mars-Obsessed?
$390 million for Mars Odyssey, $500 million for Opportunity, $820 million for the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter,
$2500 million for Curiosity, $670 million for MAVEN, $600 million for Insight, $1500 million for the Mars
Rover in 2020 (yet to be named). Total: $6.98 billion.
employees caught buying child porn from site which showed three-year-olds being abused — but they escape
prosecution. NASA employees were caught buying child pornography from a criminal ring in Eastern Europe that
distributed images of minors as young as three, it can be revealed. An investigation by Daily Mail Online found 16 staff
members from the space agency paid for pictures and videos of children in sexual situations, but were never prosecuted.
Their names have never been released because of government guidelines which protect their privacy — prompting fears
some of the culprits are still employed by NASA.
launches vital supplies (and mice) toward International Space Station. A robotic Japanese cargo vessel launched toward the
International Space Station Wednesday [8/19/2015], embarking on a five-day journey to the orbiting lab to deliver tons of supplies and
experiment gear, including a rodent crew of 12 mice [...] whose experiences aboard the space station will help researchers better
understand the effects of microgravity on the bodies of mammals.
The Editor says...
How much do the Russian charge us for transporting mice into space? Hasn't every manned space
mission resulted in similar studies already? Has anyone published any conclusions about the
adverse (or beneficial) effects of microgravity on humans? Does anyone, other than future astronauts, have the
slightest concern about those effects? The only reason science projects like this are conducted is because the
government and the news media are in a symbiotic relationship. The news media love animal stories, espcially those
involving newborn animals or small non-threatening animals. (Animal stories are wedged in to the local TV news in the
last two minutes of the Big Show, especially when there's surplus time to fill.) The local news media really like upbeat
stories about big government. If they can combine the two, everyone's happy. The government can get away with wasting
billions of dollars on pointless space travel if the news media keep publicizing the warm and fuzzy aspects of space flight.
in Mars meteorites suggests possibility of life. Methane, a potential sign of
primitive life, has been found in meteorites from Mars, adding weight to the idea that life could
live off methane on the Red Planet, researchers say. This discovery is not evidence that life
exists, or has ever existed, on Mars, the researchers cautioned. [...] Much of the methane in
Earth's atmosphere is produced by life, such as cattle digesting food. However, there are ways
to produce methane without life, such as volcanic activity.
head of science says humans 'are on the cusp' of answering the ultimate question. When
NASA representatives made their case for more funding to lawmakers in Washington D.C. Tuesday [7/28/2015],
they made a bold announcement: that humanity could be about to turn a page in its history. We're
nearing contact with alien life, NASA's head of science John Grunsfeld said to the House Committee on Science,
Space and Technology near the end of a two-hour hearing. That was his response to a question by
committee member John Moolenaar (R-Michigan), who asked what should inspire people to continuing following
NASA like they did in the days of the space race.
The Editor says...
First of all, what does "contact with alien life" mean? It doens't mean radio contact, because
it would be impossible to predict the reception of the first radio signals from other planets.
It apparently means NASA hopes to be close to the discovery of bacteria or fungus on another planet, in addition to methane
or CO2. But again, how does one testify before Congress that he is about to discover something? (Mr. Grunsfeld
needs to find a dictionary and look up the word discover) This is an obvious attempt by NASA to stay
relevant and keep the money flowing.
The Editor says...
Searching for alien life is most of what NASA does. Such a search is pointless and expensive. Suppose we pick up a radio station on a
planet that's 100 light years away. What will that prove? What would be the point of responding? Who among us would benefit in
in Mars meteorites suggests possibility of life. To shed light on the nature of the
methane on Mars, Blamey and his colleagues analyzed rocks blasted off Mars by cosmic impacts that
subsequently crash-landed on Earth as meteorites. About 220 pounds of Martian meteorites
have been found on Earth.
The Editor says...
In my opinion, which I have stated before, the likelihood of
"Martian meteorites" is approximately zero. Where are all the meteorites that were
spontaneously knocked off the Moon by the same "cosmic impact" mechanism? How massive would an
object have to be, and how fast would it have to be traveling, in order to spray relatively large rocks into space
(at greater than the Martian escape velocity of 16,500 feet per
rocks would have to be massive enough to withstand entry into Earth's atmosphere, which is dense enough to burn up almost
all but the largest meteors*. Why
would rocks ejected in such a manner from Mars come to Earth of all places? And how can anyone prove beyond
a reasonable doubt that a rock came from Mars? To summarize, this is an implausible rationalization of the
most unlikely physics since the Magic Bullet killed President Kennedy and wounded Governor Connally without incurring
any damage itself.
Earlier story from 2012 with editorial comments attached: Mars meteorite
chunks fall to Earth. Meteorite chunks from Mars fell over Morocco last summer — the
first time in 50 years such an event has occurred, scientists confirmed Tuesday [1/17/2012]. It is
only the fifth time newly fallen Martian rocks have been confirmed chemically by experts. Known Martian
meteorite falls have happened only once every 50 years or so — 1815 in France, 1865 in India,
1911 in Egypt and the last in 1962 in Nigeria. Scientists and collectors were celebrating the find.
The Editor says...
My skepticism of this story knows no bounds. Why should we send probes to Mars if Martian rocks spontaneously "fall to Earth?" How
much energy would it take to launch a rock from the Martian surface? (For those of you who attended public schools,
rocks don't just fall off of other planets.) Why would rocks leap from the Martian surface in excess of the planet's
escape velocity and head for the Earth? What are the odds that a rock leaving Mars in a random direction would find its way to
Earth and not burn up in the atmosphere? (Zero.) What chemicals are found in Martian rocks that are not found
on Earth? Why don't parts of other planets "fall to Earth" as well? Why just Mars? What about the moon — why
don't rocks travel from the moon to the Earth (and remain intact, and are somehow identifiable as having lunar origin?
Mars is, on average, about 581 times as far away as the moon.
sets $2.25m prize for 3D printed Mars habitats. Getting astronauts safely to Mars is
only the start of your problems when you're trying to explore the red planet: then you have to give
them somewhere to live. NASA has kick-started a competition to figure out just how to do that,
challenging inventors to come up with a way to not only 3D print a habitat — preferably using
materials found on-site — but do so at least semi-autonomously. To encourage the best brains
in construction, NASA is dangling a $2.25m prize in the 3-D Printed Habitat Challenge.
Killed The Messenger Probe. The scientific instruments aboard measured the planet's
magnetic field and variations in gravity that show how dense rock is below the surface. MESSENGER
scientists determined that Mercury's interior is very different than the other terrestrial worlds
(Venus, Earth, the Moon, and Mars). Instead of a slippery plasticine layer called the mantle
between the solid crust and hot core, Mercury has a layer of molten rock.
The Editor says...
As usual, there is no mention of the cost, no mention of the benefit.
detects possible polar cap on Pluto. New photos and animations of Pluto and its large
moon Charon taken by the fast-approaching New Horizons probe are revealing distinct surface features
for the first time, including a bright area that could be a snowy polar cap, mission managers said
The Editor says...
So what? If Pluto is a solid ice ball, what does that prove? How would that discovery benefit anyone?
Find Alien Life Within 20 Years, NASA Says. Is there life on other planets? People
have pondered this question for millennia, without any definitive answer. But now, NASA officials
say, we may soon be on the cusp of a breakthrough. "I believe we are going to have strong indications
of life beyond Earth in the next decade and definitive evidence in the next 10 to 20 years,"
Ellen Stofan, chief scientist for NASA, said at a public panel Tuesday [4/7/2015] in Washington, according
to the Los Angeles Times. "It's definitely not an if, it's a when," said Jeffery
Newmark, one of Stofan's colleagues.
The Editor says...
NASA's primary mission, if not its only mission, is to find life on other planets. How
can this obsession be justified? If NASA searches for another hundred years and finds nothing,
what rationale will be peddled for continuing the hunt?
Is NASA's 18-Motor All-Electric Plane. This is NASA's LEAPTech plane, an all-electric
aircraft that could help to usher in a new era of environmentally friendlier aviation. The
prototype is small, with just a 31-foot wingspan. It's also light, built out of carbon composites.
A total of 18 independently operated motors keep it aloft, and NASA says the plane will be able to reach
speeds similar to that of most small planes. It'll be the Tesla of the skies.
The Editor says...
Obviously if there were any demand for an aircraft that runs on batteries, one of several aircraft manufacturers would have
already built this plane. And if the plane had any military use, it would have already been built by the Air Force.
In other words, this is somebody's science project in search of a reason to exist.
MMS Launched on March 12, 2015. The Magnetospheric
Multiscale (MMS) mission is a Solar Terrestrial Probes mission comprising four identically
instrumented spacecraft that will use Earth's magnetosphere as a laboratory to study the
microphysics of three fundamental plasma processes: magnetic reconnection, energetic particle
acceleration, and turbulence. These processes occur in all astrophysical plasma systems but
can be studied in situ only in our solar system and most efficiently only in Earth's
magnetosphere, where they control the dynamics of the geospace environment and play an important
role in the processes known as "space weather."
The Editor says...
Every last tiny detail about the MMS mission — other than the
cost — is available here.
spacecraft blast off to provide 3D views of magnetic field reconnection. The findings
from the $1.1 billion US mission will be useful in understanding magnetic reconnection
throughout the universe. Closer to home, space weather scientists along with everyone on Earth
hopefully will benefit. "We're not setting out here to solve space weather," Burch said.
"We're setting out to learn the fundamental features of magnetic reconnection because that's what
drives space weather."
The Editor says...
The NASA description of the project is as follows:
Magnetospheric Multiscale, or MMS, mission studies the mystery of how magnetic fields around Earth
connect and disconnect, explosively releasing energy via a process known a magnetic
reconnection. MMS consists of four identical spacecraft that work together to provide the
first three-dimensional view of this fundamental process, which occurs throughout the universe.
The mission observes reconnection directly in Earth's protective magnetic space environment, the
magnetosphere. By studying reconnection in this local, natural laboratory, MMS helps us
understand reconnection elsewhere as well, such as in the atmosphere of the sun and other stars, in
the vicinity of black holes and neutron stars, and at the boundary between our solar system's
heliosphere and interstellar space."
Ordinary taxpayers don't care about any of that. Space weather can be observed, but it can't be
changed — just like terrestrial weather. It is not a problem to be solved. This entire
project is a waste of money because it is a study of natural forces that are of interest only to a
handful of people who study theoretical astrophysics. Government expenditures of this sort are
unconstitutional (i.e., illegal) because they benefit only a few specific people, not the general
public. Let the scientists spend their own money on their research projects!
What does soil moisture have to do with aeronautics and space? NASA
launches $916 million soil moisture satellite. A United Launch Alliance Delta 2 rocket
boosted an innovative NASA satellite into orbit Saturday [1/31/2015], kicking off a three-year,
$916 million mission to measure the moisture, frozen and liquid, in the top few inches of
Earth's soil to improve forecasting, to better understand the causes and impact of droughts,
floods and other natural disasters and to improve long-range climate change projections.
Soil Moisture Satellite Goes Into Orbit. The uncrewed Delta 2 launched NASA's Soil
Moisture Active Passive observatory, or SMAP, which is to spend at least three years making precise
measurements of the amount of water in Earth's topsoil. [...] NASA's price tag for the launch,
spacecraft and three years of operation is $916 million.
NASA Out of the Climate Alarm Business. Unless you live on the moon you've probably
heard lots of feverish hype attributed to NASA about 2014 being the "hottest year" ever. And being
NASA, you'd expect that they should know, given that they have all those advanced satellites we
taxpayers bought them. Well, maybe you'd be very wrong to assume that, much less to expect an
honest and objective report. A lot more skepticism on the part of the media would be prudent.
House budget would fund NASA's Europa, Mars missions. The White House budget request
for 2016 has proposed to give NASA $18.5 billion, including funding for the Mars 2020 rover and a
mission to Jupiter's icy moon Europa. [...] The White House proposal would set aside $1.361 billion
for planetary science, which is about $76 million less than Congress allotted the division in 2015.
Isn't this what NOAA is for? NASA
climate scientists: We said 2014 was the warmest year on record... but we're only 38% sure we were right. The Nasa
climate scientists who claimed 2014 set a new record for global warmth last night admitted they were only 38 percent sure this
was true. In a press release on Friday [1/16/2015], Nasa's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) claimed its analysis of
world temperatures showed '2014 was the warmest year on record'. The claim made headlines around the world, but yesterday
it emerged that GISS's analysis — based on readings from more than 3,000 measuring stations worldwide — is
subject to a margin of error. Nasa admits this means it is far from certain that 2014 set a record at all.
Facing The Heat For Hottest Year Lie. With great fanfare NASA announced that 2014 was
the hottest year on record. The part of the story they didn't mention is they are only 38% sure it
was the hottest on record. The other thing they didn't mention is that surface temperatures were
used rather than satellite data and part of their data used estimated temperatures. Per the UK
Daily Mail, "the claim made headlines around the world, but yesterday it emerged that GISS's [NASA's
Goddard Institute for Space Studies] analysis — based on readings from more than 3,000
measuring stations worldwide — is subject to a margin of error. NASA admits this
means it is far from certain that 2014 set a record at all.
Nears Pluto After Nine-Year Trip. NASA spacecraft New Horizons is finally drawing
close to Pluto almost nine years after setting off on the three-billion-mile journey from Earth.
Pluto is around 3.67 billion miles from the Sun and, when it was discovered in 1930, it was the
planet furthest from the solar system's centre.
explosion, NASA knew aging Soviet engines posed risks. Years before an unmanned rocket
erupted in a fireball in October, NASA officials knew the metal in its 50-year-old Soviet-made
engines could crack, causing fuel to leak and ignite, government documents show. As early as 2008,
a NASA committee warned about the "substantial" risk of using the decades-old engines, and a fire
during a 2011 engine test in Mississippi heightened the agency's concern.
Gets NASA Funding for the SR-72 Hypersonic Spy Drone. NASA awarded Lockheed Martin a
modest $892,292 earlier this month to study the feasibility of developing an unmanned hypersonic spy
plane called the SR-72. This superfast recon drone, first teased in November 2013, would fly at
speeds of Mach 6.0, or 4,500 mph. That's almost double the speed of the Lockheed SR-71
Blackbird, which made its first flight 50 years ago.
$349 million monument to its drift. In June, NASA finished work on a huge construction
project here in Mississippi: a $349 million laboratory tower, designed to test a new rocket engine
in a chamber that mimicked the vacuum of space. Then, NASA did something odd. As soon as the
work was done, it shut the tower down. The project was officially "mothballed" — closed
up and left empty — without ever being used.
launches Orion spacecraft. [Lockheed Martin Corp.] handled the $370 million test
flight for NASA from the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, opting for the Delta IV rocket this
time given its heft.
a climate change coping app and win cash in NASA's new $35,000 challenge. NASA and the
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) are offering more than $35,000 in prizes to citizens who design apps — computer
applications — to make use of available climate data to respond to climate change. The competition opens
Dec. 15. The challenge stems from the latest National Climate Assessment that says the U.S.
already faces or will face challenges because of climate change.
did Earth's water come from? Rosetta data muddies [the] picture. Water vapor emitted
by Comet 67P/Churyumov-Geramisenko is very different from the water found on Earth, casting doubt on
the belief that Earth's water originally came from comets. [...] A leading theory to explain the
Earth's oceans has been that the water was delivered from space by heavy bombardment by comets in
the distant past.
The Editor says...
No, the "leading theory" is in the first chapter of the Bible. Only a fool would believe that
comets from nowhere delivered the oceans to this planet, especially considering that the mass of
the oceans is 1.35 x 1018 metric tons, and further considering
the fact that comets must have stopped bringing water (for no reason) sometime before written history
began, and the comets from nowhere delivered water to this planet, but not to Venus or Mars.
New Horizons Pluto Probe 'Wakes Up' for Work. From 2.9 billion miles away, NASA's New
Horizons spacecraft let its handlers know on Saturday that it has awakened from hibernation and is
ready for the climax of its nine-year trip to Pluto. The first signals were received at the
mission's control center at Johns Hopkins University's Applied Physics Laboratory in Maryland via a
giant radio antenna in Australia just before 9:30 p.m. ET, nearly four and a half hours after it was
sent by the piano-sized probe. It takes that long for signals to travel between there and here at
the speed of light.
The Editor says... Wow-eeee! I just can't wait to see what Pluto looks like, especially after we
spent $650 million for the pictures — assuming
there'e enough light to make pictures.
Examples of Government Waste. [#43] NASA spent $360,000 for people to stay in slightly
declined beds for 70 days to test the effects of gravity on humans over long durations of time.
NASA had already conducted this experiment many times since the 1960s. [#44] NASA gave two grants
totaling $237,205 to the University of Washington to study how rainfall effects the red crab's annual migration
to Christmas Island. Researchers hope this study will help them better understand the potential
consequences of climate change for the red crabs.
Surrounds NASA's Secret Mission in Africa. A NASA official recently confirmed that one
of the agency's aircraft had been spotted on an American military airstrip in eastern Africa a few
weeks ago, but like a series of U.S. military officials, declined to say what the space agency's
high-tech bird was doing there. "I really can't give you any of the details," Jim Alexander, a
NASA official with the WB-57 High Altitude Research Program, told ABC News. "You know, the airplane
was there, you see it in the picture. But I really can't tell you what it was for."
wobbling of Saturn's moon might mean there's an ocean sloshing inside of it. Planets aren't always filled
with molten rock, and guessing the composition of distant planets can be a tricky business. But
scientists now believe that Saturn's moon Mimas has one of two things under its icy, rocky surface:
a core shaped like a football or a liquid ocean. In a study published Friday [10/17/2014] in Science,
researchers analyzed Mimas's movements as it orbited Saturn. By looking at images from NASA's
Cassini satellite, they determined how much Mimas was wobbling. The wobble was a lot wonkier
than expected, leaving the research team puzzled.
The Editor says...
That's all very amusing, and it must be nice to make a living by engaging in idle speculation about such immaterial concerns.
(That's a problem if they are government scientists whose paychecks come from tax dollars.) But the maximum
temperature of Mimas is something
like 80 or 85 degrees Kelvin, and there aren't many materials that "slosh" at those temperatures.
Having solved all other problems... White
House Seeks Ideas For Building a 'Solar System Civilization'. While the rise of the
barbarous Islamic State and the spread of the modern day plague of Ebola has many concerned about
the state of civilization here on earth, some at the White House are turning their attention beyond
our planet. A Tuesday [10/14/2014] entry on the White House blog solicits ideas for "massless exploration and
bootstrapping a Solar System civilization" and "how the [Obama] Administration, the private sector, philanthropists,
the research community, and storytellers can further these goals." "Bootstrapping" is a term employed by
Dr. Phillip Metzger, former NASA research physicist now on the University of Central Florida faculty.
The Editor says...
How will your life improve if and when NASA reaches an indisputable conclusion about what happened to the water on Mars — assuming
they can tell if there ever was any water? Such a discovery won't make any difference to anybody. The entire project
is a complete waste of taxpayers' money.
MAVEN spacecraft enters
Mars orbit to explore its climate change. It won't land on the red planet but instead
study Mars' atmosphere from above to answer questions about its climate change, NASA says. NASA's
MAVEN craft will live up to its formal name — the Mars Atmosphere and Volatile Evolution
craft — by helping scientists figure out how ancient Mars changed so dramatically into
the planet we know today.
The Editor says...
The writer of the article immediately above relies (as Perry Mason would say) on facts not in evidence.
How do NASA scientists know with any certainty what Mars looked like long ago, and what makes them think Mars
has changed at all? More importantly, how is the history of the Martian climate relevant to anything
picks Boeing and SpaceX to ferry astronauts. NASA will turn to aerospace giant Boeing
and "new space" startup SpaceX to launch U.S. astronauts again from American shores, ending a
reliance on Russian Soyuz capsules that began after the last space shuttle landed on Earth three
and SpaceX Will Fly Astronauts to the International Space Station. In a much
anticipated announcement, NASA Administrator Charles Bolden said today (Sep. 16) during a webcast
that spacecraft made by Boeing Company and SpaceX will carry American astronauts to the
International Space Station (ISS) by 2017. Two vehicles, Boeing's CST-100 and SpaceX's Dragon V2,
will launch from Cape Canaveral in Florida and take Americans into low Earth orbit, before docking
with the ISS. Each company will run between two to six missions, carrying teams of four astronauts
The Editor says...
Or, to put it another way, looking for traces of life that probably never existed.
New space race: 3
companies vie to build space shuttle successor. The agency says a decision on which company will build its next-generation
vehicle to put astronauts in space is imminent. A $4 billion contract is at stake, and that's made for some intense competition.
Boeing is one of three companies competing to build the successor to the space shuttle. It hopes its CST-100 capsule will be chosen to
ferry Americans to the International Space Station.
think they have dust specks from outside our solar system. Researchers studying the
contents of a capsule returned to Earth in 2006 at the conclusion of the Stardust spacecraft's
primary mission believe that they have found seven remarkable specks on its collection panels.
Although they weigh about 10 trillionths of a gram in all, the microscopic motes of "alien" dust
described in the journal Science could alter astronomers' perception of the galaxy beyond our own
The Editor says...
So-called scientists are determined to find and explain the real origins of the universe — not that
mythical story in the Bible — and they are willing to base their beliefs on a few picograms of dust.
between a comet and a space probe. If all goes well, the mission in November will carry out
the first landing on a comet. Rosetta will send a robot chemistry lab to the surface to delve into a
theory that comets hold the key to understanding how our star system formed. "After completing a
complex series of nine orbital manoeuvres since the end of hibernation on January 20, Rosetta is
finally in position to rendezvous with the comet," the European Space Agency (ESA) said on Tuesday [8/5/2014].
The Editor says...
As usual, the whole purpose of this probe is to find a way to disprove the first chapter of the Bible.
That's what they mean when they talk about "searching for clues about the origin of the universe." At least
in this case, it's the European Space Agency throwing money into space, not NASA.
Mars Mission: Red Ink for the Red Planet. [Scroll down] What we don't see with
our earth-bound eyes is a dollar sign anywhere in this exciting news. Visionaries aren't fond of
mundane concerns such as the costs of their pet projects. George W. Bush, who was never very good at
counting costs, urged the nation to embrace the Mars mission in 2004. Bob Park of the American Physical
Society recalled at the time that the president's father was boosting a Mars mission when he was in the White
House in 1989. "He invoked Columbus, as they always do," Park said. "He said like Columbus 'we dream
of shores we've never seen' and went on to propose a return to the Moon and then on to Mars. And that
lasted until they got a cost estimate." Cost estimates of the Mars mission appear to be rarer than moon
rock and wide as the solar system, ranging from $6 billion to $500 billion or more. The
race to put men on the moon has been pegged at $100 billion. The space station cost another
The total cost of the International Space Station, through 2015, is estimated at $150 billion.
Is the International Space Station Worth $100 Billion?
Asking the International Space Station to justify its existence is a tall order. NASA estimates the station has cost U.S. taxpayers $50 billion since
1994 — and overall, its price tag has been pegged at $100 billion by all member nations. [...] The space agency contends that the weightless
environment provided by the station offers a unique way of unmasking processes of cell growth and chemistry that are hidden on Earth. But some critics
don't see a zero gravity laboratory as filling a crucial scientific need.
The Editor says...
Why study zero-gravity cell growth? Nobody operates a farm in zero gravity.
Two American Astronauts From Russian Blackmail. The United States paid Russia 60 million dollars
per American astronaut to get access to the Space Station. Russia pledged tit-for-tat measures in revenge for
U.S. sanctions, by refusing to allow Americans access to our 150 billion-dollar International Space Station,
of which the United States paid 84 percent of the cost. Russian Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin
even threatened to cut off American access to the station, saying "I propose that the United States delivers its
astronauts to the ISS with the help of a trampoline." Sadly, today NASA cannot put men into space without
Russian cooperation and hasn't done so for years.
is Stagnant. [W]hile NASA was able to put men on the Moon within eight years of the
Apollo program's start, the space agency has been unable to go further in the four and a half
decades since. In fact, it is no longer capable of going to the Moon and, as these lines are
written, is totally adrift, with no real plan for going anywhere.
The Editor says...
This is the perfect time to eliminate NASA — while nothing is being accomplished.
The Editor says...
By that, the Associated Press apparently means carbon dioxide; however, CO2 is not the main driver of climate change.
In my opinion, the variable output power of the sun is. Nor is carbon dioxide the most influential greenhouse gas.
That would be water vapor. Even so, one must give the AP credit for one thing: At least they mentioned the half-billion-dollar
price tag of this futile mission. Most news coverage of NASA projects omit dollar amounts.
NASA satellite images show our air getting cleaner. If Americans are breathing easier
than they were a decade ago, these new NASA satellite images may help explain why. They
show — in vividly color-coded maps — that levels of nitrogen dioxide, an
important air pollutant, have plummeted across the country over the last decade.
The Editor says...
That's all very nice, and it proves that the EPA's work is finished, so we can get rid of the EPA now.
But why was this a NASA project rather than a NOAA project?
craft readying for launch. The U.S. space shuttle program retired in 2011, leaving
American astronauts to hitchhike into orbit. But after three long years, NASA's successor is almost
ready to make an entrance. Orion, the agency's newest manned spaceship, is being prepared for its
first mission in December. In future missions, it will journey into deep space — to Mars
and beyond — farther than humans have ever gone before.
The Editor says...
There is no mention of the cost of Orion in this article, but
it is estimated elsewhere at $500 million per launch.
Warming 'Fabricated' by NASA and NOAA. Scientists at two of the world's leading
climate centres — NASA and NOAA — have been caught out manipulating temperature data to overstate
the extent of the 20th century "global warming". The evidence of their tinkering can clearly be
seen at Real Science, where blogger Steven Goddard has posted a series of graphs which show
"climate change" before and after the adjustments. When the raw data is used, there is little if
any evidence of global warming and some evidence of global cooling. However, once the data has been
adjusted — i.e., fabricated by computer models — 20th century 'global warming' suddenly looks much
more dramatic. This is especially noticeable on the US temperature records.
The news media waves a shiny object to divert us from
Barack H. Obama's many scandals. Providing those distractions may be their primary mission! NASA
Curiosity Rover Celebrates First Martian Year. Today marks the first Martian
year — 687 Earth days — since NASA's Curiosity rover landed safely on Mars.
The robot has had a string of groundbreaking discoveries since it landed on the red planet in
Humans on Mars by 2035 is 'primary focus'. "In the near term, Mars remains our primary focus,"
Ellen Stofan, NASA's chief scientist said May 15 in a talk at the Royal Institution in London. [...] "I
don't think that first group will necessarily stay there, but we need to think of this as establishing an
outpost," she said. "We want it to be possible for those people to come back if they want to, but
it's the beginning of sustained human presence on Mars." Stofan said the drive behind this huge
undertaking is the fundamental question: "Are we alone?" NASA also plans to continue studying
the moon and asteroids, she said.
The Editor says...
Someday the American taxpayers are going to realize that as a country we do not have money to spend
on the exploration of other planets. There is no practical reason for it, and it does not
"promote the general Welfare," as some people tend to claim about every government undertaking.
Samples of lunar dirt were brought back in the 1970's and they're just dry, sterile and lifeless rocks and
dirt. The same is almost certainly true of the rocks and dirt on asteroids and other planets.
NASA has no tangible end product, and even if NASA could import a truckload of dirt from the Martian surface,
it would be a laboratory specimen of no value to the general public.
As NASA seeks next mission, Russia holds
the trump card. As an uncommonly brisk night fell over Houston last week a tiny
Russian spacecraft, bathed in blinding sunlight, re-entered the Earth's atmosphere and plunged
toward a dusty steppe in Kazakhstan. Of the three astronauts inside one was American, Rick
Mastracchio, returning from a 188-day stay aboard the International Space Station. His arrival was
closely watched in Houston, where Johnson Space Center has responsibility for U.S. human operations
in space. [...] Such is today's space Realpolitik that, while the United States paid for most of
the $140 billion space station, launched nearly all of it into orbit, and controls most of its
day-to-day operations from Houston, Russia still holds the trump card: access. "They
have us right where they want us," said three-time NASA astronaut Mike Coats.
no man has gone before. James Van Allen, after whom the radiation belt is named,
asked in 2004 whether human spaceflight is a legacy dream, a survival of some outdated
science-fiction notion, now overtaken by harsh reality. [...] He asks the obvious question:
why bet on the loser, manned space flight when unmanned space has proved the winner?
Russia to ban US from using Space Station over Ukraine
sanctions. Russia is to deny the US future use of the International Space Station
beyond 2020 and will also bar its rocket engines from launching US military satellites as it hits
back at American sanctions imposed over Ukraine crisis. Russia's deputy Prime Minister Dmitry
Rogozin announced a series of punitive measures on Tuesday [5/13/2014] against the US in response to sanctions
imposed after Russia annexed Crimea. The two countries have long cooperated closely on space
exploration despite their clashes in foreign policy. The Space Station is manned by both American
and Russian crew, but the only way to reach it is by using Russia's Soyuz spacecraft.
Obama tightens sanctions, Russia notes its control of U.S. space access. In the event of escalating sanctions,
Russian diplomats promise a "tit for tat" exchange of punishments. Which might seem comical given Russia's relatively
small economic power. Except for one major thing. Because Obama allowed the U.S. space shuttle program to die
in 2011, scores of missions short of the crafts' designed lifespans, the only way for American astronauts to reach space
and return now is in Soyuz spacecraft atop Russian rockets. This relinquished America's hard-won space superiority.
Rocket Science: House Conservative Targets NASA's $3 million Spent to Find
Intelligent Life ... in Congress? An Arizona conservative congressman is shining light on how President
Barack Obama is using $3 million of taxpayer money to teach National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
officials how to lobby Congress. In the first of a series of efforts targeting wasteful government spending,
Rep. Paul Gosar (R-AZ) wrote to House Appropriations Committee chairman Rep. Hal Rogers (R-KY) last week to pressure
him to include language banning the Obama administration from spending money on the program.
Nasa Cuts Ties With Russia
Over Ukraine. Nasa employees cannot travel to Russia, host visitors, or email Russian counterparts,
according to a memo sent out to workers. Activities relating to the International Space Station are exempt.
In a statement Nasa said it will continue to work with Russia's space agency "to maintain safe and continuous
operation" of the station.
The Editor says...
It's hard to imagine that the Russians will continue to provide transportation for American astronauts
if the U.S. is burning its bridges. In other words, this is a bad time to be an American in space.
Pays Russians $71 Million to Send American Astronaut into Space. President Obama
cancelled NASA's $9 billion space program in 2010, which was set to build three new shuttles.
"To people who are working on these programs, this is like a death in the family," NASA chief Charles
Bolden said at the time. Bolden has expressed concern about relying on the Russians for space
missions, and others are worried that current tensions with the country could leave American astronauts
stranded in space.
NASA Thinks Society Will Collapse. Few think Western civilization is on the brink of collapse —
but it's also doubtful the Romans and Mesopotamians saw their own demise coming either. If we're to avoid their
fate, we'll need policies to reduce economic inequality and preserve natural resources, according to a NASA-funded study
that looked at the collapses of previous societies. [...] As limited resources plague the working class, the wealthy,
insulated from the problem, "continue consuming unequally" and exacerbate the issue, the study said.
The Editor asks...
What does this have to do with aeronautics and space?
Our Comrades at NASA.
You may well wonder just what NASA, (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) is doing funding research on
the decline of the Roman Empire when officially it is supposed to be responsible for America's civilian space
program and for aeronautics and aerospace research.
Gov't Agency Is Becoming an 'Organ to Play the Music of Karl Marx'? Glenn Beck slammed NASA on his radio program Tuesday [3/18/2014],
saying it should be "defunded right now" and is being fitted into an "organ to play the music of Karl Marx." Beck's ire centered
around a study sponsored by NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center claiming industrialized nations have created an unsustainable model
doomed to implode, and the solution is to dramatically reduce resource consumption and income inequality.
planning to make water and oxygen on the Moon and Mars by 2020. NASA is forging ahead with plans to make water, oxygen, and
hydrogen on the surface of the Moon and Mars. If we ever want to colonize other planets, it is vital that we find a way of extracting
these vital gases and liquids from moons and planets, rather than transporting them from Earth.
The Editor says...
Projects of this sort take money out of your pocket and result in no benefit to you whatsoever.
to try growing vegetables and herbs on the moon to see if humans could one day live there. Nasa is to try growing vegetables and herbs on the
moon to see if humans could one day live there. The US space agency plans to send seeds to the moon in 2015 in sealed canisters containing everything
that is needed for the seedlings to thrive. As well as ten seeds each of basil and turnips, there will also be around 100 seeds of Arabidopsis,
a small flowering plant related to cabbage and mustard.
MAVEN takes off. Today [11/18/2013],
NASA will launch a new mission — one that cost $671 million and has been in development for 10 years — to
determine what happened to the water on Mars. [...] It could be that some of the missing water has been absorbed into the soil
or simply frozen. But scientists are intrigued by another possibility — water on Mars may have evaporated and
been lost to space.
NASA launches new spacecraft to orbit Mars. You may have heard
it before: Billions of years ago, Mars probably looked more like Earth does now, with clouds and oceans and a much thicker atmosphere. [...] So
what happened? Where did the air and water go? [...] NASA says the mission will cost $671 million.
The Editor says...
NASA — or at least CNN — presumes to know what Mars looked like "billions of years ago."
It's Official! Voyager 1 Spacecraft Has Left
[the] Solar System. A spacecraft from Earth has left its cosmic backyard and taken its first steps in interstellar space.
After streaking through space for nearly 35 years, NASA's robotic Voyager 1 probe finally left the solar system in August 2012, a
study published today (Sept. 12) in the journal Science reports.
Voyager probe 'leaves Solar System'.
Launched in 1977, Voyager was sent initially to study the outer planets, but then just kept on going. Today, the
veteran Nasa mission is almost 19 billion km (12 billion miles) from home. This distance is so vast
that it takes 17 hours now for a radio signal sent from Voyager to reach receivers here on Earth.
Exiting the Solar System and
Fulfilling a Dream. By today's standards, the spacecraft's technology is laughable: it carries an 8-track tape recorder and
computers with one-240,000th the memory of a low-end iPhone. When it left Earth 36 years ago, it was designed as a four-year mission to
Saturn, and everything after that was gravy.
The Editor says...
This event happened about a year before it was announced. I suspect NASA is just now announcing it to push Obama's many scandals off the
front page of the local newspapers. In the next few weeks, look for other wonderful discoveries to be announced by various government
agencies. Don't listen to the American mainstream "news" media without a great deal of skepticism.
Google's Brin, Page lose
Pentagon fuel subsidy on private jets. Google co-founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page have lost a jet fuel perk, according to a new
report. Google and the Pentagon inked a deal, which started in 2007, that let Google purchase fuel for its entire fleet — seven
jets and two helicopters — at a discounted price from the US government, according to the Wall Street Journal.
Google Jet Fleet
Loses a Pentagon Fuel Perk. The agreement between the Google founders and the government, which started in 2007, ended Aug. 31
after officials at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration — which sponsored the arrangement — opted not to
renew it, according to a Pentagon spokeswoman.
Man Made Climate Change Arguments Don't Survive
Scrutiny. As an example, in 2006 NASA predicted sunspot cycle 24, the current cycle we're in now, would be the strongest in 300 years.
The reality is that it will be the weakest in 100 years. They could not have been more wrong. Computer models from the 1990s predicted that global
average surface temperature would continue to increase after the year 2000. They were wrong. There has been no measured temperature increase since 1998.
The Editor says...
The article goes on and on and on about the technical specifications of the satellite, and indeed, tells you "everything you need to know"
about it — except the cost. Apparently the Washington Post writer believes you don't "need to know" that. Once again
NASA, with nothing else to do, is flying around in circles, but this time the circles will be around the moon.
LADEE. The Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer (LADEE) is designed
to study the Moon's thin exosphere and the lunar dust environment. [...] Total mission cost is $263 million.
Energy Department nominee
struggled with financial management at NASA. Elizabeth Robinson, the woman President Obama has named to make the Energy Department's
oft-criticized contracting more efficient, is leaving behind a trail of spending questions in her past job as NASA's chief financial officer.
A Washington Times review of NASA inspector general reports finds the space agency struggled to achieve austerity under Ms. Robinson's financial
leadership, as cost overruns grew sixfold from $50 million in 2009 to $315 million in 2012.
Sounds like busy work to me. NASA To Study How Pollution, Storms And Climate
Mix. NASA aircraft will take to the skies over the southern United States this summer to investigate how air pollution and natural emissions,
which are pushed high into the atmosphere by large storms, affect atmospheric composition and climate.
Caution: Chinese propaganda site. May not be factual. US eyes Mars mission. The Obama administration
has called to an end to the Constellation program which was initiated by the Bush administration, but his new space policy commits to
increasing NASA funding and focuses on a Mars mission. What does his administration's Aerospace plan mean for the US?
"We start by increasing NASA's budget by $6 billion dollars over the next 5 years. [...]"
Another day, another pointless and expensive experiment. Why NASA Is Firing Cell Phones Into
Space. The space agency this week took a handful of cheap but powerful smartphones, slapped them to a gigantic rocket and
blasted them into low-earth orbit to see how they'd fare. The project, called PhoneSat, is one of those wacky experiments that
seems at first to have nothing to do with science.
US won't be returning to moon, NASA chief
says. "NASA is not going to the Moon with a human as a primary project probably in my lifetime," Bolden told a joint meeting of the
Space Studies Board and the Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board in Washington last week, according to Jeff Foust of SpacePolitics.com.
"And the reason is, we can only do so many things." Instead, he said the focus would remain on human missions to asteroids and to Mars.
The Editor says...
Park it near the moon? Why not park it near the Earth? Would that not be more reasonable? Are we going to send astronauts
almost all the way to the moon, so they can study a hijacked asteroid instead? Not likely. Chances are, every asteroid is
a mass of sterile dirt and rocks, much like Mars and the Moon. I suspect the robots have already seen everything worth seeing.
With a national debt approaching $17 trillion, do we have the money for this foolishness? What could NASA possibly find on a
randomly selected asteroid that would justify this expense? And what exactly IS the price tag on this boondoggle?
Treasonous Obama Strikes Again.
The world is laughing at us. It has come to light that the Obama administration has allowed hundreds of Chinese
nationals — who are closely associated with the Chinese Liberation Army — to work in a sensitive area of NASA's
Langley Research Center. What could possibly go wrong? Here's what: one of these nationals, Bo Jiang, was arrested on
Monday [3/18/2013] at Dulles International Airport for apparently attempting to take sensitive information out of the U.S.
NASA's Chinese Spy Problem. Looks like
NASA is suffering from a massive infestation of Chinese spies. So, let me get this straight (and I'm not being funny here):
• We've got radical Islamists in our government, committing a soft coup from within. Check.
• We've got Commie radicals in our unions, schools and major institutions. Check.
• We've got Commies, radical Islamists and spies in our political ranks. Check.
• We've got Commie spies from China throughout our scientific communities. Check.
The only surprise here, is that we haven't been totally destroyed from the enemies within yet.
Subjugated, "Repurposed" and Sleeping With Our Enemies. When Obama came into power over four years ago, I knew it
was the opening volley of the destruction of much of what America holds dear. One of the first things he did was attack NASA.
People may have forgotten the layoffs and changes in NASA. I haven't. Obama has overseen the Islamization of NASA with
instructions to run a Mohammedan outreach program. He cut the Constellation program, intended to develop new rockets to carry
people into space and the space shuttle program was mothballed — with a special dissing of Texas because they bucked
Obama's EPA mandates. Stellar thuggery gone mad — space exploration, the Chicago way.
probe of defense tech allegedly leaked from NASA stonewalled, sources say. A four-year FBI investigation
into the transfer of classified weapons technology to China and other countries from NASA's Ames Research Center is being
stonewalled by government officials, sources tell FoxNews.com. Documents obtained by FoxNews.com, which summarize
these and other allegations and were given to congressional sources last week by a whistle-blower, described how a "secret
grand jury" was to be convened in February 2011 to hear testimony from informants in the case, including a senior NASA
engineer. But federal prosecutor Gary Fry was removed from the case, which was then transferred from one office in
the Northern District of California to another where, according to the documents, "this case now appears to be stalled."
"The information is staggering," the whistle-blower told FoxNews.com.
NASA spends your money on projects unrelated to space travel: The Green Ninja.
What, you might ask, is the Green Ninja? It is an animated climate-action superhero aimed squarely at school children. In other
words, mind poisoning climate alarmist propaganda meant to indoctrinate children into the green belief system. What's worse, it is
being funded by US government grant money. Not since communism has such a concerted effort been made to brainwash the young before
they have a chance to learn how to think for themselves. [...] The project has received a $390,000 grant from NASA to support professional
development for teachers, and $20,000 from PG&E to pilot an energy reduction contest for Santa Clara County middle schoolers.
NASA to smash two probes into the moon today.
[Scroll down] This information will give scientists insights into what lies beneath the lunar surface, and in addition to enlightening us about the moon,
it will tell us about the evolution of Earth and other rocky worlds in the inner solar system.
The Editor says...
The two articles immediately above included no mention of the cost of this mission. Nor is there any explanation of how the average taxpayer benefits from
gravity mapping the moon. Nor is there any proof that NASA is any closer to disproving the first chapter of the Bible, which offers a theory (at the very
least) of "how the solar system formed."
The Air Force has its own space program. U.S.
military sends mystery space drone back into orbit. The U.S. military launched its highly secretive unmanned $1 billion
X-37B space plane into orbit today from Cape Canaveral on top of an Atlas V rocket. The U.S. Air Force which operates the small,
top-secret version of the space shuttle still will not say how long the third X-37B mission will last, nor what the vehicle will be doing
to send new rover to Mars in 2020. Most missions to Mars have failed, although there have been a handful of successful projects,
including the Pathfinder, which landed in 1997 and the Spirit, which landed in 2004 and roamed the surface for six years before contact was
lost. The $2.5 billion nuclear-powered Curiosity is designed to hunt for soil-based signatures of life on the Earth's nearest
neighbor and send back data to prepare for a future human mission.
The Editor says...
How many Martian probes do we really need? There have been multiple robotic probes sent to Mars already, and they have all landed in
exactly the most favorable spots to "find evidence of life" or to "pave the way for manned missions" to Mars, etc., and they have all found
nothing but sterile dirt. Every Mars mission is called a success, even if nothing is found. The Martian probe business is a
classic example of multi-billion-dollar pork that benefits almost no one in this country.
Of Space and Men. With its moon mission
accomplished, if NASA was to achieve the eternal life that Ronald Reagan identified, space travel needed to be cheaper. The
answer appeared to be a reusable orbiter. The space shuttle promised, but it failed to deliver. Over its 30-year life,
135 missions have cost over $200 billion, two orbiters, and fourteen astronaut lives.
final final approach. Interesting how attached humans can become to a machine with a name, as if it had a personality. Or,
more likely, carried within it some of the peoples' hopes and dreams.
This will never happen: NASA considers orbital outpost near moon as next big
project. Top NASA officials have picked a leading candidate for the agency's next major mission: construction of an outpost that would
send astronauts farther from Earth than they've ever been. Called the gateway spacecraft, it would hover in orbit on the far side of the moon, support
a small crew and function as a staging area for future missions to the moon and Mars.
Somebody doesn't know what unprecedented means. Illiteracy at NASA.
Apparently NASA should start distributing dictionaries to the authors of its press releases.
The chances of finding spontaneous life on any planet are practically zero. Doug Axe explains the
chances of getting a functional protein by chance. The final probability of getting a functional protein composed of 100 amino acids is
1 in 10125. Even if you fill the universe with pre-biotic soup, and react amino acids at Planck time (very fast!) for 14 billion
years, you are probably not going to get even one such protein. And you need at least 100 of them for minimal life functions, plus DNA
Boeing, SpaceX win $900 million in
awards for spacecraft. The U.S. retired its shuttle fleet last year and relies on countries such as Russia to ferry
astronauts and supplies to the International Space Station. The administration wants the private sector to take over those jobs so
NASA can focus on missions to asteroids and Mars. NASA pays about $63 million per seat on Russian Soyuz spacecraft.
In the private sector, this is called "outsourcing" and "shipping jobs overseas". NASA chief: U.S. won't go it alone on
manned Mars mission. U.S. astronauts won't land on Mars by themselves but with international partners in the 2030s, NASA's
chief said Wednesday. [...] Obama administration plans are for the $17.7 billion space agency to land an astronaut on an asteroid
in 2025, then go to Mars by the middle of the 2030s. The mission inevitably will be international, as will any future human landings
on the moon, [Charles] Bolden said. "We already have gone there first," he said.
The Editor asks...
What does that have to do with aeronautics and space?
gets two military spy telescopes for astronomy. The secretive government agency that flies spy satellites has made a
stunning gift to NASA: two exquisite telescopes as big and powerful as the Hubble Space Telescope. They've never left the
ground and are in storage in Rochester, N.Y. [...] The telescopes have been declassified, though they remain sufficiently sensitive
that neither the NRO or NASA would provide a photograph of them.
The Editor says...
Last year's model, perhaps? These two have "never left the ground", they say, but how many others
just like them are in orbit right now?
The Editor says...
This "aeronautics and space" project apparently has no connection to NASA, which just goes to show that the development
of spacecraft for national defense is being done by the U.S. military, and the frivolous use of space for "human cannonball"
stunts is being done by NASA.
NASA rocked by
global warming rebellion. Fifty top astronauts, scientists and engineers at NASA have signed a letter
asking the agency to cease its global warming buffoonery. The global warming emperor has no clothes, and
people are finally saying so out loud and in public. Notrickzone brings us the entire letter, noting that
the signers have a combined 1000 years of professional experience.
condemn NASA's global warming endorsement. In an unprecedented slap at NASA's endorsement of global warming
science, nearly 50 former astronauts and scientists — including the ex-boss of the Johnson Space
Center — claim the agency is on the wrong side of science and must change course or ruin the reputation
of the world's top space agency. Challenging statements from NASA that man is causing climate change, the former
NASA executives demanded in a letter to Administrator Charles Bolden that he and the agency "refrain from including
unproven remarks" supporting global warming in the media.
Astronauts Protest NASA's Global Warming Activism. With proponents of the theory that human activity
is the cause of global warming becoming increasingly defensive of their flawed theory, the joint letter signed by
NASA veterans — including several heroes of the space program — is one more blow to a theory
which has been losing ground in the realm of public opinion. And the letter is particularly critical of the
Goddard Institute for Space Studies, where both director Jim Hansen and climatologist Gavin Schmidt have been
particularly vocal proponents of the theory of manmade climate change.
Nasa scientist: climate change is a moral
issue on a par with slavery. Averting the worst consequences of human-induced climate change is a "great moral issue" on
a par with slavery, according to the leading Nasa climate scientist Prof Jim Hansen. He argues that storing up expensive and destructive
consequences for society in future is an "injustice of one generation to others".
probe offers new view of Mercury. Mostly ignored since a brief fly-by in the 1970s, Mercury, our solar system's smallest,
swiftest planet, received a longer house call last March: NASA's $450 million Messenger probe, which achieved orbit, a
tricky feat never before attempted.
The Editor says...
The government took money out of your paycheck (under threat of imprisonment) to pay for this. How are you better off
if we now have clearer pictures of Mercury? You aren't.
A Year Later, Mysterious Space Plane Is Still in
Orbit. The Air Force's secretive X-37B space plane gets more mysterious by the day. Designed to
spend up to nine months on unspecified errands in Earth's orbit, the second copy of the Boeing-made craft, known as
Orbital Test Vehicle 2, has now been in space for a year and two days — and is still going strong.
The endurance milestone is unqualified good news for America's space force at a time when its funding and future missions
are in doubt. There's just one thing. We still don't know exactly what the 30-foot-long X-37B is doing
to land after a year in orbit. The plane resembles a mini space shuttle and is the second to fly in space. It
was meant to land in March, but the mission of the X-37B orbital test vehicle was extended — for unknown reasons.
NASA laptop contained the command codes to control the International Space Station. A laptop stolen from NASA
contains the control codes used to command the International Space Station. The unencrypted laptop stolen last year is
among dozens of mobile devices containing sensitive information that have been reported missing from the space agency, an internal
investigation has found. Giving testimony on the space agency's security issues, NASA Inspector General Paul K. Martin
told Congress that 48 agency devices were lost or stolen over a two year period.
Stolen NASA laptop had Space Station control
codes. A NASA laptop stolen last year had not been encrypted, despite containing codes used to control and command the
International Space Station, the agency's inspector general told a US House committee. NASA IG Paul Martin said in written
testimony (PDF) to the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology that a laptop was stolen in March 2011, which "resulted
in the loss of the algorithms used to command and control the ISS".
Budget Would Cut Mars Program, Solar System Exploration. The budget coming Monday [2/13/2012] from
the Obama administration will send the NASA division that launches rovers to Mars and probes to Jupiter crashing
back to Earth. Scientists briefed on the proposed budget said that the president's plan drops funding for
planetary science at NASA from $1.5 billion this year to $1.2 billion next year, with further cuts
continuing through 2017.
Mars too dry for life.
Life could not exist on the surface of Mars because the planet has experienced a 600 million year "super-drought",
The Editor says...
Good! Now we can stop sending expensive probes to Mars.
postpones two manned launches to International Space Station. Worrisome cracks in its spacecraft have
forced Russia to postpone two manned launches to the International Space Station (ISS), the Interfax news agency
reported Friday — echoing a 2011 situation that left the country's space transport vehicles grounded
and led to speculation that scientists may be forced to abandon the orbiting space base.
Probes Have New Year's Date with the Moon. [Scroll down] While scientists focus on gravity,
middle school students will get the chance to take their own pictures of the moon using cameras aboard the probes
as part of a project headed by Sally Ride, the first American woman in space. There's already chatter about
trying to extend the $496 million mission, which was slated to end before the partial lunar eclipse
admits losing moon rocks. NASA's Inspector General says the US space agency seems to have misplaced
some pieces of the moon, meteorites and other space items. NASA concedes that more than 500 pieces of
space material have been stolen or been missing since 1970. That includes 218 stolen moon samples that
were returned and about two dozen moon rocks and chunks of lunar soil that were reported lost last year.
Have they checked eBay? Hundreds
of NASA's moon rocks reported missing. The space agency has lost or misplaced more than
500 pieces of the lunar rocks and other space samples, NASA's inspector general reported Thursday [12/8/2011],
making the case for better inventory controls. Astronauts on the Apollo moon landings from 1969 to 1972
returned 842 pounds of lunar rock and soil to Earth. The space agency now loans samples, along with
meteorite and comet dust, to about 377 researchers worldwide. The space agency now lists 517 moon rock
samples as missing or stolen.
With discovery, NASA now on the
road to finding Earth's twin. Our world felt a little less special on Monday, as NASA's Kepler
mission announced the discovery of an "Earth-sized" planet orbiting a "sun-like" star. Yes, another one.
But this new orb merits special status — because it's the first planet to be officially confirmed to
exist in the so-called "habitable zone." It's an ideal size. It orbits just the right distance
from its star, which is a lot like our own sun.
The Editor says...
The Earth is "a little less special" only to the godless left-wing fools who run NASA. The article above
sounds as if it were written by NASA itself: "It orbits just the right distance from its star,"
etc. Oooo... It's just the right color and it all nice and round and everything.
Is Not Scientific. One of the changes among scientists in this century is the increasing number
who believe that one can have complete and certain knowledge. For example, Michael J. Mumma, a
NASA senior scientist who has led teams searching for evidence of life on Mars, was quoted in the New York
Times as saying, "Based on evidence, what we do have is, unequivocally, the conditions for the emergence
of life were present on Mars — period, end of story."
The Editor says...
This time, NASA says methane would be concrete proof of life on Mars. What are the chances of finding methane
in the air if they can't find water on the ground? Why didn't they test for methane two or three probes ago,
and how does the presence of methane prove anything? And how do we know there's not a little can of methane
on the probe just in case they can't find any native methane?
Obama readies to
blast NASA. Word has leaked out that in its new budget, the Obama administration intends to
terminate NASA's planetary exploration program. The Mars Science Lab Curiosity, being readied on the
pad, will be launched, as will the nearly completed small MAVEN orbiter scheduled for 2013, but that will
be it. No further missions to anywhere are planned.
After running out of things to do... NASA rolls out Web-based game. NASA must
think some people are interested in learning how astronauts, mission controllers and scientists communicate
during space missions. The agency is rolling out a game called NetworKing that puts players in charge of
building a fast and efficient communication network.
Abandons Space. Not long ago, Capt. Shen Zhong of the Chinese Navy Research Institute said:
"The mastery of outer space will be requisite for military victory, with outer space becoming the new venue for
combat." Certainly the Chinese development of an operational anti-satellite program speaks to Beijing's
view that space is not a demilitarized zone.
The Editor says...
Even if there are no U.S. astronauts in orbit, we have not abandoned space. There is still a lot of
hardware in orbit, and unmanned rockets are launched periodically to add more. If there is a potential
for warfare in space, that's a matter for the Air Force and the Army, not NASA.
Fallen Satellite Highlights Human Fears. [Scroll down] Undoubtedly anyone who had just
avoided being hit by a piece of satellite crashing to Earth should be warned about its potential for "sharp
edges" — but the government's decision to send UARS plummeting into the atmosphere on an unknown
trajectory sounds like the very definition of abandonment of property. The notion that the killjoys at
NASA would insist on trying to pry fragments of their abandoned property from the hands people who had nearly
become victims of their reckless practices for de-orbiting satellites is lost somewhere between humorous and
The Wages of Terror.
We may not have a space program anymore, but NASA has partnered with Saudi Arabia on "lunar and
asteroid science research". The good news is that the Saudis can afford to buy us a new shuttle,
so long as we don't let any women drive it.
Will NASA Abandon Ship?
Problems with the Russian crew rocket may force the space agency to abandon the space station.
scientist pleads guilty to attempted espionage. Stewart Nozette, once a prominent
scientist for NASA who served on the Space Council under President George H.W. Bush, pleaded
guilty Wednesday [9/7/2011] to attempted espionage, a case that attracted widespread notice but
began as a seemingly routine fraud investigation.
Agency Creep. In a much-reported event, the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration revealed that its "foremost" mission is to improve relations with the Muslim
world. Note the complete and obvious lack of intersection between the words "aeronautics/space"
and "Islam/outreach." Nonetheless, President Obama decided that such outreach logically
followed the space shuttle, Hubble, Rover, and space station successes. In a more recent
drift from core competencies, NASA chief Charles Bolden played politics by steering the shuttle
museum decision away from Republican-dominated Houston, home of the shuttle program and most
of its astronauts.
Administration: Lost in Space. Astronauts are stranded on the space station.
America's once-mighty Space Shuttle fleet has been disassembled and mothballed with nothing to
replace it. The Russians, once the inferior player in the space race, is the only hope left
to rescue the stranded astronauts.
May Strike Humans To Save The Galaxy: Study. Beyond endangering the earthly inhabitants, humans
may have posed a serious threat to the entire galaxy, possibly prompting aliens to destroy humanity in order
to end global warming and save the rest of the galaxy from being contaminated as well. Surprisingly, the
suggestion comes from one of NASA's scientists.
Shuttle: a journey through space and time that took us nowhere. The Shuttle story should really
be titled "Lost in Space". About $210 billion went towards a programme born of fantasy. The
story came to an end because the American government finally accepted what experts realised at the beginning:
strip away the drama of manned space travel, and the Shuttle is an expensive and complicated way to provide
what should be a cheap and simple service.
NASA: Muslim world here we come.
Now that the space shuttle program has been retired, NASA can start focusing on its primary mission:
reaching out to the Muslim world.
Soyuz carrying Furukawa blasts off for
ISS. [Satoshi Furukawa] is the third Japanese to spend an extended period of time at the space
station. Also on his task list at the ISS are zero-gravity experiments, including making green tea,
trying out "suminagashi" Japanese ink marbling and growing cucumbers.
The Editor says...
In other words, they sent him up there with nothing to do.
Boeing lays off 260 shuttle workers in
Houston. Boeing today [6/3/2011] sent layoff notices to 510 employees — including
260 in Houston — involved in space shuttle work. The notices give 60 days advance
notice of an expected job elimination.
Federally Funded NASA
'Educates' Children About Global Warming on 'Climate Kids' Web Site. The National Aeronautics
and Space Administration (NASA) Web site network includes "Climate Kids: NASA's Eyes on the Earth," which
use cartoons, games, and other activities to teach children about man-made global warming and climate change.
According to NASA's budget request for fiscal year 2012, totaling $18.7 billion, the agency would dedicate
$145.8 million to educational programs. The "Climate Kids" site is supported through NASA's educational
programs, according to a spokesman with the agency.
NASA Over a Russian Barrel.
The Russians are asking exorbitant fees to transport our astronauts to the space station while preventing
American private companies from doing the job.
Adventures in Federal
Budget Cutting. [Scroll down] Though a space scientist, I have never actually worked for
NASA, but was considered for the position of chief scientist by NASA heads Jim Fletcher in 1989 and by Mike
Griffin in 2001. But perhaps my views about certain NASA programs had become known to them. I
have always considered the International Space Station as a big 'White Elephant' — and the
manned-moon base of George Bush the elder and George W. Bush an even bigger disaster. Needless to
say, I did not get the NASA job. I still consider the space station to be a fairly useless enterprise.
Space isn't a jobs
program. In the most austere fiscal climate in memory, Congress refuses to be serious about
space policy. When the Obama administration, based on recommendations from a blue-ribbon panel in 2009,
proposed cancellation of the overbudget, behind-schedule, underperforming Constellation program a year ago,
its decision was hamstrung by wording that Congress had added to legislation that prevented NASA from shutting
down any aspect of it. As a result, the space agency, like other government programs, has been forced to
continue spending hundreds of million dollars on a program that most, including many in Congress, now agree will
not move forward in its present form.
$424 million dumped in the ocean. NASA
Satellite Rocket Launch Fails, Lands In Ocean. A rocket carrying an Earth-observation satellite
plummeted into the Pacific Ocean after a failed launch attempt Friday [3/4/2011], the second-straight blow
to NASA's weakened environmental monitoring program.
Climate Fail for NASA. The earth observation satellite Glory failed to reach orbit on Friday [3/4/2011]
after its protective cover did not detach following its launch, a NASA official said. "The fairing
did not separate and the vehicle does not have sufficient velocity with the fairing on to achieve orbit," an
official said on NASA TV, adding that there was "no indication as to why it did not separate."
Coincidences in Failure of NASA Climate Monitoring Satellites. [Scroll down] Just a
little over two years ago, on February 24th, 2009, a Taurus assigned to deliver the Orbiting Carbon
Observatory (OCO) met exactly the same fate, and the two lost satellites are probably sitting on the ocean
floor not far from each other. After that failure, OSC [Orbital Sciences Corporation] conducted an
investigation to determine its cause. Apparently, that investigation failed as well, because if they
had discovered and fixed the problem, it's unlikely it would have happened again on Friday.
questions NASA's budget proposal. Lawmakers from both sides of the aisle criticized NASA's fiscal 2012 budget
proposal this week for diverting funding from manned spaceflight towards boosting the commercial space industry.
air traffic may be a factor in climate change. Wispy white jet contrails are a familiar sight, a
sign of today's considerable air traffic, and to some people, a visible reminder of environmental threat. The
trails — formed when moisture condenses around aircraft engine exhaust — create cirrus clouds
that block solar energy from above and trap heat below. They may be contributing to warming of the Earth's
surface temperature, NASA studies show.
NASA: Study Space! (Not Climate.) The amount of money being spent to study global warming,
as a percentage of NASA's budget, is startling — especially when one considers this is not
part of NASA's original mission. In budget year 2010, NASA spent 7.5% of its funding —
over $1B — to study global warming. On top of that — the vast majority of federal
stimulus money given to NASA in 2010 was spent on studying global warming. As a whole, the U.S. federal
government has spent $8.7 billion dollars on global warming studies — just in the past year!
Many of the sixteen separate agencies doing this work were performing redundant research. In a time of
federal spending cuts that are sure to come, much of this redundancy certainly can and must be eliminated,
saving taxpayers billions.
NASA launches search for
'moon trees'. The agency announced last week that it is still searching for several hundred "moon
trees" grown from seeds carried aboard the Apollo 14 command module that orbited the moon in 1971.
Part science experiment, part public relations campaign, the idea was to see whether space flight affected
their ability to sprout.
The Editor says...
The seeds orbited the moon before they sprouted. So what? Unless you're extraordinarily
superstitious about the moon, how does that add any value to the trees?
advocates U.S. decline. Consider James E. Hansen, director of the taxpayer-funded NASA Goddard
Institute for Space Studies. Last week, blogger Marc Morano discovered a Nov. 24 blog post by Mr. Hansen
calling on China to lead an international effort to impose fees on carbon-dioxide emissions, then lead the World
Trade Organization to allow import fees on goods from any county — with the U.S. being the target — without
such fees. The goal would be to punish America, causing "continual descent into second-rate and third-rate
economic well-being," until the "fossil-money- 'democracy'" no longer "rules the roost in Washington." Mr. Hansen
also praised communist Chinese leadership for "tak[ing] the long view ... in contrast to the West with its [lamentably]
short election cycles."
The Tom Friedman of Climatology.
One of the striking features of our political era is that increasing numbers of liberals are coming out of the
closet as enemies of the Constitution and of democracy. The latest is James Hansen, who heads the NASA
Goddard Institute for Space Studies. Hansen is, to be blunt, an awful human being and one of the worst of
the global warming fraudsters. Under his guidance, NASA's data have become so unreliable as to be an
embarrassment to any scientists who may still be in the picture.
One giant leap from a lake to a lapse.
The news is buzzing with headlines like "Arsenic eating bacteria suggests extraterrestrial life possible," the
headlines are not on the Enquirer at the checkout line, they are coming from NASA.
NASA pushes for a green
jetliner. They might be best known for space travel, but the folks at NASA are determined to shape the future
of commercial aviation. The agency says airliners need to be quieter, greener and more fuel-efficient. To
attain those goals, NASA handed out nearly $6 million in contracts this week to two defense industry giants:
Lockheed Martin Corp. and Northrop Grumman Corp.
The Editor says...
Nothing in the Constitution authorizes the funding of basic scientific research, and nothing in the Constitution
permits the federal government to meddle in the operation of lawful private businesses. If the airlines
consider projects of this sort to be necessary, let them foot the bill. Remember, NASA has no money of
its own. That was your money they gave away!
Budget, Time for Republicans To Be ... Republicans. Part of the mythology of the agency is that
it is somehow important to national security for NASA to have its own unique means of getting astronauts into
space. Some (and even some who should know better, on the Hill) imagine that it's literally true, in the
sense that there are secret military missions performed by NASA astronauts (there aren't). Others see it
as symbolic, harkening back to Apollo when it was a matter of international prestige in an existential Cold
War with the Soviets.
Future Of NASA and A "Moon Shot" At The Economy. Since the Apollo program ended and the shuttle
program began, astronauts have been going only on orbital missions, launching and servicing satellites, and
building the hugely expensive space station which seems to be used more by the Russians than the U.S.
What new innovations, discoveries, or developments have come from the space station program? Maybe
occasionally they use it for something useful but mostly it's just a waste of money and was primarily built
for political purposes to give Russia and the U.S. common grounds for working together after the cold war.
NASA previews its sexiest Mars Rover yet.
JPL scientists allowed a sneak peak Thursday at "Curiosity," the $2.3-billion generation-next of Mars rovers
that has scientists both elated and tense as they draw near its 2011 launch date.
A candy-coated suicide mission: The
Hundred Year Starship. Nasa is planning an audacious mission to send a manned spacecraft on a
one-way trip to permanently settle on other planets. The ambitious idea is known as the Hundred Years
Starship and would send astronauts to colonise planets like Mars, knowing they could never come home.
the 'S' In NASA Suddenly Stand for 'Stupid'? The latest example of the brainless void in the
Obama administration (no, not Joe Biden this time) comes directly from the head of NASA. The space
agency's Administrator Charles Bolden said recently that the "foremost" mission of our space agency was to
make Muslims feel good about stuff they did hundreds of years ago. It's not an accident. Bolden
had been in Cairo promoting this stupidity, following up on Obama's speech a year ago catering to the Muslim
Muslim outreach: Al Jazeera was told first. Lawmakers across Capitol Hill, both Democrats
and Republicans, were surprised to learn recently that the Obama administration has made reaching out to Muslim
nations a top priority for the space agency NASA. They will probably be more surprised to learn that
administration officials told the Middle East news organization Al Jazeera about it before they told Congress.
Set aside whatever you are thinking now about making Muslim nations feel good. If this was the new NASA
administrator's "mission," how is it discernible from, say, a mission that could be assigned to the Secretary
of Education? Couldn't General Bolden accomplish his mission without even having to put anything or any
person into space ever again? This "mission" has the earmarks of the bad mission statements I recall from
my tenure as a cubicle-dweller: It is a "save the world" (and its children and Muslims) mission, and it
has nothing specific to do with NASA itself. It could apply equally to the Dept. of Education, the Dept.
of Energy, or the Dept. of Agriculture.
Farewell to Space.
Just when you thought Barack Obama's toadying to Islam could not get any worse, now comes this: The
President directed the new administrator of NASA, retired Marine Major General Charles Bolden, as "perhaps
[his] foremost" charge to "find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage more dominantly Muslim
nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science... and math and engineering."
One Giant Leap
(Backward). "Waste anything but time." That was the motto of the teams behind NASA's
Apollo missions. That spirit has long since evaporated. Today's NASA is pulled by a million
missions, from improving education and spinning off more products like Tang to its latest call of duty:
telling Muslims how good they are at math. ... We've gone from "waste anything but time" to "waste everything,
especially time" in about a generation.
NASA-Muslim Outreach Story 'Has Not Made the Cut'. Total words about the NASA Muslim outreach
program in the New York Times: 0.
• Total words about the NASA Muslim outreach program in the Washington Post: 0.
• Total words about the NASA Muslim outreach program on NBC Nightly News: 0.
• Total words about the NASA Muslim outreach program on ABC World News: 0.
• Total words about the NASA Muslim outreach program on CBS Evening News: 0.
The Distance NASA
Travelled Over 48 Years. [Scroll down] One listens to this interview and remembering
this is the United States of America we are talking about, one is tempted to say the piece is an absolutely
nutty story, one wants to say it is ridiculous, even bizarre, a fraud. Then one realizes it is real,
it is where we have traveled in the last 48 years, and one shudders.
Allah's final frontier.
What's unclear is what Mr. Bolden believes the United States has to gain by reaching out to a part of the world
that has been technologically stagnant for centuries. The Muslim world has nothing to offer the United
States as a space-faring nation. If anything, America should be discouraging Middle East space programs.
Iran has the most advanced space initiative in the region and claimed to have launched a satellite in February.
It's a short step from putting satellites in space to being able to do the same with warheads.
Space Program Bows To Mecca. At a time when the only missile programs in the Arab world, namely
in Syria and Iran, are aimed at hitting Israel with chemical, biological and nuclear weapons, NASA administrator
Charles Bolden goes on Al Jazeera to tell the Muslim world his "foremost" goal was to make them feel good about
their achievements in math, science and engineering. Citing the International Space Station as an example,
Bolden described space travel as an international collaboration of which Muslim nations must be a part.
Making Carter Years look Like Paradise. The United States government and some in media seem obsessed
with appeasing anybody and anything Islamic. Only the latest example is the decree from NASA that its
"foremost" mission is to recognize and appreciate the contributions of Muslims to science.
The Right Stuff Goes
Wrong. The president and Bolden think it will improve relations with the Muslim world if we praise them
for their work in math and science many centuries ago, but what has the Muslim world done for humanity lately?
Muslim pandering 'not good for the country'.
A conservative media watchdog thinks the mainstream media has virtually ignored the NASA administrator's recent
outlandish statement that the "foremost" mission of the space agency is to improve relations with the Muslim
world. NASA Administrator Charles Bolden made that announcement on the English language version of Al Jazeera,
which Jeff Poor of the Media Research Center's Business and Media Institute believes was a questionable move
in and of itself.
The White House backpedals at full speed: Muslim
Outreach Not the Job of NASA, White House Says. White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs
said Monday [7/12/2010] that NASA Administrator Charles Bolden must have misspoken when he told Al Jazeera
last month that one of his top priorities is to reach out to Muslim countries. "That was not his task
and that's not the task of NASA," Gibbs said. Bolden, though, said last month in the interview that
it was President Obama who gave him that task. He made a similar claim in February.
In Search of Islam's Contributions.
NASA administrator Charles Bolden gave an interview in late June to Al Jazeera television and told the
Arabic-language news network that before he took his new job, Obama told him that "perhaps" his "foremost"
duty was "to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations
to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science ... and math and engineering." This
is ludicrous. It is not our government's job to make foreigners feel good about themselves.
Norm Augustine's Subversive Agenda.
To commemorate the first anniversary of Barack Obama's Cairo speech, NASA Administrator Charles Bolden, interviewed
on al Jazeera TV, said that one of his foremost responsibilities was improving relations in the Muslim
world by highlighting their contributions to math, science and engineering, thereby making them feel better.
Notwithstanding that Muslims abroad learned of this outreach before the Americans who will fund it did, while
your first instinct may be to focus on the emotional aspects of using taxpayer-funded NASA to enhance public
relations with Muslims, a sizable majority of whom hate us, we must look at the totality of what Barack Obama is
doing to America's military and space programs and how those actions are intertwined, before the national
security implications become apparent.
NASA's Final Frontier.
Once upon a time, NASA led America's great ascent into the final frontier. But in a stunning case of
misplaced priorities, the space agency now seems to be primarily concerned with raising Muslim self esteem.
Outreach Program 'Confirmed' Despite White House Denial, Rep Says. The White House is
disavowing a plan to have NASA conduct outreach to Muslim countries, but a congressman who talked to
NASA Administrator Charles Bolden about that plan last month said the initiative was very real until
somebody slammed the brakes on it. Rep. Pete Olson, ranking Republican on the Space and Aeronautics House
Subcommittee, told FoxNews.com that Bolden described the outreach program as part of the administration's
space plan during a conversation they had in June.
What Muslim Scientific Achievements?
[Scroll down] Walid Phares, an author and senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies,
noted that the U.S. shouldn't "be in the business of bringing religion, Islam or other to space development." ... "This
is a ridiculous concept. Those who enter a spaceship are humans not members of religious sects.
I think what lays behind this medieval perception of space technology is a policy of partnership with
Islamist regimes, most of which are oppressive of their own people."
This is a man with very little work to do: Holdren:
US Must Prepare for Asteroid. If an asteroid were on a collision course with Earth, would we be
ready to defend against its destructive impact or would we be helpless and defenseless? NASA, America's
space agency, is being charged with leading the way to protect not only the U.S. but the entire world in the
event of such a horrifying scenario.
Now that global warming has fizzled, let's
move on to the next crisis. Climate Alarmism Takes
Off in a New Direction. NASA has just voiced its concern over the threat that our modern
technological society is now facing from "solar storms." Now it's true of course, that our society has
become quite dependent on new technology, such as satellite communications and GPS mapping, that is vulnerable
to the effects of major solar storms, but NASA seems to be a bit too worried about how big the threat
to nowhere. In a speech given at the Kennedy Space Center last month, President Obama
reaffirmed his administration's decision to cancel Constellation, NASA's program to create new vehicles
for human flights to the moon and Mars. If implemented, this decision will guarantee a decade of
non-achievement by NASA's human spaceflight program, at a cost of more than $100 billion.
accused of 'Climategate' stalling. The man battling NASA for access to potential "Climategate"
e-mails says the agency is still withholding documents and that NASA may be trying to stall long enough to
avoid hurting an upcoming Senate debate on global warming.
NASA global warming lawsuit. In case you missed this item on Thursday [5/27/2010], the Competitive
Enterprise Institute is suing NASA over its failure to respond to requests made under the Freedom of Information
Act going back to 2007.
Obama Space. [Scroll down]
Why are they doing this? I haven't a clue. The real disappointment is that they choose to decentralize
and privatize manned space flight while doing everything humanly possible to take over and control the rest of
the American economy. My guess is that the $19-billion NASA budget is not large enough to warrant their
interest and that most of the manned space flight activities are conducted in "Red States."
military launch space plane on maiden voyage. A top secret space plane developed by the US
military has blasted off from Cape Canaveral on its maiden voyage. Billed as a small shuttle, the
unmanned X-37B heralds the next generation of space exploration. It will be the first craft to carry out
an autonomous re-entry in the history of the US programme. But its mission — and its
cost — remain shrouded in secrecy.
weapon that can strike anywhere on Earth in 30 minutes. Call it a reusable space vehicle. Call it a
space plane. But whatever you do, just don't call it a space weapon. That's the message from the Air Force
after last week's launch of its X-37B Orbital Test Vehicle, which can stay on orbit up to 270 days. The
Air Force won't say what, exactly, the robotic space plane will be doing there, how long it will linger this time,
or even how much it costs.
The Editor says...
All that secrecy can only mean one thing: It's a weapon.
of life on Mars. NASA scientists last night unveiled compelling evidence of life on Mars. A special
mission to the Red Planet has revealed the likely presence of a form of pond scum — the building blocks of
life as we know it.
The Editor says...
I wonder why we're only hearing about this "discovery" in a British tabloid. And what exactly is
a "special mission"?
Losing it in space.
Rather than reaching toward the stars, America's premier scientific organization has settled its sights on
studying shrimp schools beneath the Antarctic ice cap and sticky accelerators on Toyotas.
Hiding NASA Decline.
The agency that put Americans on the moon can't tell you the temperature that day. It isn't returning to
the moon, but it will fix the brakes on your car. Two senators want to know what's going on.
NASA chief vows help for Florida employees.
NASA chief Charles Bolden on Wednesday [2/24/2010] outlined plans to help the Kennedy Space Center and Florida's
aerospace workers through the cancellation of the back-to-the-moon program — without mentioning
comparable assistance for Houston's Johnson Space Center.
NASA into a Global Alarmism and Scares Administration: The president's budget gives the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration a hefty $6 billion budget increase over the next five years, with nearly
$2.5 billion dedicated to research on global climate change. ... It is activism, not science, that the Obama
administration's vast new funding will encourage.
To Boldly Go Nowhere: NASA Foregoes Moon, Concentrates
on 'Global Warming'. [Scroll down] The President of the United States, according to [a] story
in the Orlando Sentinel, doesn't seem to share that sense of wonder or to understand the educational, societal
and economic value that comes along with indulging natural human curiosity about the universe we live in.
If he has his way, Obama will replace the sonorous call to "boldly go where no man has gone before" with a mere
murmur, to blandly study what everyone has been studying for years.
The Atheist-Dominated National Academy of
Sciences. It is important for us to understand the mindset of the hierarchy of the National
Academy of Sciences (NAS) because they are the ones whose alleged expertise on "global warming" will justify
the Democrats' cap-and-tax legislation. Over the last 50 years, the NAS hierarchy has become one
of the most poisonous organizations in America, a nest of atheists who base their pseudo-scientific dogma on
the arbitrary rejection of God, and not upon empirical evidence and the scientific method.
NASA chief: Mars is our
mission. NASA's emerging exploration plan will call for safely sending humans to Mars, possibly
by the 2030s, and de-emphasize exploration of the moon, the agency's leader said Tuesday [2/9/2010].
Panel Says NASA Needs To Privatize.
A blue-ribbon panel said Tuesday [9/8/2009] that a lack of financing has left NASA's current space program on an "unsustainable
trajectory" and that the Obama administration should consider using private companies to launch people into low-Earth orbit.
The panel, convened in May in response to a request by President Obama, delivered an executive summary of its report
to the Office of Science and Technology Policy. The full report is expected later this month.
This report is dubious at best: India's lunar mission finds evidence
of water on the Moon. Dreams of establishing a manned Moon base could become reality within two decades
after India's first lunar mission found evidence of large quantities of water on its surface. Data from
Chandrayaan-1 also suggests that water is still being formed on the Moon. Scientists said the
breakthrough — to be announced by Nasa at a press conference today [9/24/2009] — would
change the face of lunar exploration.
The Editor asks...
Large quantities of water, really? If you paid any attention in high school, you may remember that the moon
has no atmosphere, so if there is a puddle of water, it sits in a vacuum, and must endure an average daytime
temperature of about 107°C. (Remember what happens at 100°C.?) A pond or a lake would
last about half an hour under those conditions. If there are large quantities of water on the
moon, why has no probe detected them until now, and why are there no clouds around the moon? And really,
"water is still being formed on the Moon"? It is being formed out of what? Could this report be
any more absurd?
40 years later, the moon landings have unintended consequences. Plan to Combat
Global Warming? Pie in the Sky. Whenever you hear a politician start a sentence with, "If we can
put a man on the moon...," grab your wallet. For years, Democrats, enthralled by the cargo cult of the
Kennedy presidency, have used the moon landing as proof that no big government ambition is beyond our
reach. ... The problem with the "if we can put a man on the moon, we can certainly spend trillions on
this or that" formulation is that it sees political and scientific accomplishments as interchangeable.
mission to bomb the Moon. The LCROSS mission will blast off from Cape Canaveral, Florida,
carrying a missile that will blast a hole in the lunar surface at twice the speed of a bullet. The
missile, a Centaur rocket, will be steered by a shepherding spacecraft that will guide it towards its
target — a crater close to the Moon's south pole. Scientists expect the blast to be
so powerful that a huge plume of debris will be ejected.
The Editor says...
In all likelihood this explosive long-distance exploration will probably accomplish little or nothing.
How many billions of dollars will be thrown away on fireworks shows of this kind, before the general public
complains about the waste of their money?
Wanted: A Space Program
with a Vision. In 1993, when the space station was on the verge of being canceled, it was saved
by only one vote in Congress, and then only because the Clinton administration converted it to a foreign-aid
program for the Russians. This explains much of the quandary in which we remain today; in which we are
dependent on them for a lifeboat to get us to the Space Station and for actual access to it after the Shuttle
retires next year, if current policy follows through.
Earth bears scars of human destruction:
astronaut. [In July 2009, the Endeavour] astronauts delivered a Japanese-built experiment platform,
installed new batteries for the station's solar power system and stashed spare parts to keep the station operational
after shuttles are retired next year after seven more flights. The $100 billion station, a project of
16 nations, is nearing completion after more than a decade of work.
underwear an endeavor of its own. In what might embarrass less adventurous souls, astronaut Koichi
Wakata is returning to Earth with the pairs of underwear he wore for a solid month during his space station stay
so that scientists can check them out. They are experimental high-tech undies, designed in Japan to be
The Editor says...
Was it necessary for this man to be in orbit to test his underwear? Is this going to be called a beneficial
by-product of space travel, even though it could have been accomplished on the ground? Are experiments
of this sort really worth 18 billion dollars a year?
NASA employee speaks out on 'Pride Month'.
A NASA employee is voicing concern over a recent email and memo from her supervisors. The controversial
memo was sent out by NASA officials to employees and encouraged them to celebrate "Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and
Transgender Pride Month," in accordance with a presidential proclamation. NASA officials not only encouraged
employees to celebrate the pro-homosexual observance, but also encouraged them to participate in pride events in
their communities. If there was no such event in their community, employees were encouraged to start one.
chief tells employees to celebrate gay pride month. The Catholic News Agency reported this
morning [6/12/2009] that National Aeronautics and Space Administration's acting Chief Christopher J.
Scolese sent an internal communication to all employees at the space agency directing them to organize and
participate in Gay Pride Month celebrations.
Family Advocates Baffled as NASA
Celebrates Homosexual "Pride" Month. Pro-family advocates are charging The National Aeronautics
and Space Administration (NASA) with having gone "completely-off mission" with its decision to officially
promote homosexual rights. ... "LGBT Pride Month is a reflection of NASA's commitment to inclusiveness
across the broad spectrum of our workforce," said NASA's Acting Administrator Christopher J. Scolese.
NASA goes 'completely off-mission' with LGBT
Pride Month, critic charges. [Scroll down] John Stemberger, president of the Florida
Family Policy Council, said [Christopher J.] Scolese's announcement was "stunning" and charged that it
promoted activities which "'celebrate' aberrant forms of sexual conduct." He called the action
"completely off-mission" and counterproductive to the best interests of children, families and "the common
good of society." ... He said the action breeds "bad internal morale" and disrespects the consciences of "tens
of thousands, if not the vast majority, of NASA's own 300,000 employees" who object to "the promotion of
A Scientific Organization or a Political One? NASA is wasting time, energy and taxpayer dollars
promoting an immoral, unnatural and unhealthy sexual behavior, something that — if they really
wanted to do a public service — they would discourage along with other self-destructive unhealthy
NASA is launching a telescope to find
Earth-like planets. The universe may be filled with Earth-like planets — worlds
where extraterrestrials might flourish. But these planets were once considered too small to spot,
even with the latest in space technology. Now, many astronomers believe NASA's $600 million Kepler
telescope, which is scheduled to shoot into space this week, will help to clear up the mystery.
NASA Satellites Get 'Counterfeit' Parts;
Taxpayers Pay. Maybe it was something he didn't mean to say. Or maybe NASA has a problem.
At a House subcommittee hearing on NASA's cost overruns, the agency's acting administrator, Christopher Scolese,
was asked why it is that so many space projects fail to stick to their budgets. He listed a variety of
reasons, including management mistakes, bad planning or the sheer complexity of missions that have never been
tried before. And then he said, as one extra point, that some spacecraft are built with parts that turn
out to be "counterfeit."
Bolden Is Tapped to Run NASA. President
Barack Obama picked former astronaut and retired Marine Corps Gen. Charles Bolden Jr. to head the National Aeronautics and
Space Administration, but controversy over his background and NASA's future direction could complicate his job.
extra $1.4B for lunar missions. Efforts to return to the moon are supported by the Obama White House,
and NASA will receive $1.4 billion extra next fiscal year for a variety of lunar missions, a preview of the
new administration's first federal budget showed Thursday. The White House released a bare outline for the
$3.55 trillion federal spending plan that includes a recommendation of $18.7 billion for NASA.
On the other hand... NASA may
abandon plans for moon base. NASA will probably not build an outpost on the moon as originally
planned, the agency's acting administrator, Chris Scolese, told lawmakers on Wednesday [4/29/2009]. His
comments also hinted that the agency is open to putting more emphasis on human missions to destinations like
Mars or a near-Earth asteroid.
H.R.1: The House's Pig Pen.
[Excerpt from NASA's requests:] $400,000,000 — Science (not less than $250,000,000 "shall
be solely for accelerating the development of the tier 1 set of Earth science climate research
missions); $150,000,000 — Aeronautics; $50,000,000 — Cross Agency Support
Programs (restoration and mitigation of NASA infrastructure and facilities
damaged during 2008 disasters).
The Editor says...
It sounds like NASA is moving away from space exploration and turning into an employment agency for
Martian Methane Suggest
Solar-Induced Global Warming. A group associated with NASA`s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, using
NASA`s Infrared Telescope Facility at Mauna Kea Observatory in Hawaii discovered plumes of methane in the Martian
atmosphere over several seasons of observations. Methane is a gas normally produced by biological or volcanic
processes-something not believed possible on Mars, which is considered both biologically and geologically dead.
The Editor says...
If Mars is considered dead, why are we spending billions to send probes there?
Nasa rocket crash is big
setback to knowledge of climate change. The satellite, which was the first Nasa had dedicated
to measuring the greenhouse gas from space, was expected to transform science's grasp of the "carbon sinks" in
soil, forests and oceans that absorb CO2 and keep much of it out of the atmosphere. Its observations were
considered crucial both to predicting future carbon dioxide levels and to developing strategies for
protecting the sinks that hold back its damaging effects.
£190m 'global warming' satellite crashes. Nasa scientists were left red-faced today after
a £190 million rocket carrying a global warming satellite crashed into the ocean near Antarctica.
The Orbiting Carbon Observatory was the agency's first attempt to measure atmospheric carbon dioxide from
space and was designed make climate change models more accurate.
Professor, Wife Accused of Defrauding NASA of
Hundreds of Thousands of Taxpayer Dollars. The FBI and NASA are investigating a University of
Florida professor and his wife for allegedly defrauding NASA out of hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars
for their own personal use. Iranian-born Samim Anghaie, 59, is the Director of the Innovative Nuclear
Space Power and Propulsion Institute at the University of Florida. His wife, 55-year-old Sousan Anghaie,
is president of New Era Technology Inc. (NETECH) in Gainesville, Fla.
Conspiracy theorists spot 'timber plank' on Mars. An
image sent back from the Red Planet has revealed an object bearing an uncanny resemblance to a wooden
log. It was captured by the Mars Rover near the Endurance Crater. ... [However], there is no
scientific evidence of any macroscopic plant life on Mars and the vista in the image is one of a vast
and desolate desert.
What are the chances? U.S. And Russian Satellites Collide.
In an unprecedented space collision, a commercial Iridium communications satellite and a defunct Russian satellite ran into
each other Tuesday [2/10/2009] above northern Siberia, creating a cloud of wreckage, officials said today. The
international space station does not appear to be threatened by the debris, they said, but it's not yet clear whether it
poses a risk to any other military or civilian satellites.
Big Communication Satellites Crash 500 Miles Above
Siberia. Scientists are keeping a close eye on orbital debris created when two communications
satellites — one American, the other Russian — smashed into each other hundreds of miles above the
Earth. NASA said it will take weeks to determine the full magnitude of the unprecedented crash and whether any other
satellites or even the Hubble Space Telescope are threatened.
Thousands of fragments spread from satellite
wreck. A high-speed collision between American and Russian satellites in one of the most congested regions of
space was bound to happen and has significantly increased the floating pools of debris above the Earth, experts said
Thursday. "The debris cloud created by this collision is like a shotgun blast," said David Wright, a senior scientist
with the Union of Concerned Scientists' Global Security Program.
Space Laws: Space is
governed by laws, too. Today in Popular Mechanics, Glenn Reynolds gives an overview about space
laws — what he calls "rules of the road" for space. But he also explains how certain "standards of
practice" have not yet been written, most having to do with space debris. When the laws governing
space were written forty years ago, who would have every thought there would be so many satellites roaming
The Law of Space Collisions:
International Rule Above the Earth. When two satellites collided on Wednesday nearly 500 miles
over Siberia, the first thought for NASA scientists was to assess the effects space debris would have on the
International Space Station. Now that the ISS has been deemed out of harm's way, damages are being
assessed. The question now turns to who pays for damages in space.
vow remaining tool bag won't drift away. Astronauts vowed to double-check, even triple-check,
to make sure a bag of tools is properly tied down during a spacewalk Thursday [11/20/2008] so it doesn't
float away like one did earlier this week. ... The bag was one of the largest items ever lost by a
spacewalking astronaut, and NASA guessed it cost about $100,000.
Update: Tool Bag Lost In Space Meets
Fiery End. A tool bag lost by a spacewalking astronaut last year met its fiery demise in Earth's atmosphere
Monday [8/3/2009] after months circling ever closer to the planet. The $100,000 tool bag plunged toward Earth and burned up as
it re-entered the atmosphere, according to the U.S. Air Force's Joint Space Operations Center tracking it and more than
19,000 other pieces of space junk in orbit today from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California.
Space station's remodeling will
fix water supply — but don't ask. Time for a remodeling job for the International
Space Station. At 10 years old, it needs more bedrooms, another kitchen and bathroom and a more
reliable water supply — though one that might make most folks squirm a bit. Top priority for
the Endeavour crew, poised to lift off Friday night from Florida for a 15-day mission: installing
hardware designed to recycle urine into drinking water.
NASA capsule Orion resembles Apollo. The agency unveils the test module for structural testing
at Edwards Air Force Base. The capsule, designed to carry humans to the moon, looks a lot like the
one that first did so four decades ago.
can't reach Mars lander, ends mission. NASA scientists said on Monday they could no longer
communicate with the Phoenix Mars Lander and were calling an effective end to its five-month-plus mission
on the Red Planet. Mission engineers last received a signal from the lander on November 2, the space
NASA's Ares V may crush Kennedy
crawlerway. The budget for NASA's Constellation programme — comprising the Orion and Ares
vehicles — looks like it may have run to a few billion cubic metres of road surfacing after the agency
admitted the Kennedy Space Center crawlerway over which spacecraft are trundled to their launchpads could collapse
under the weight of the Ares V heavy lifter.
This is tabloid journalism at its most doubtful. Life on Mars. Alien
microbes living just below the Martian soil are responsible for a haze of methane around the Red Planet, Nasa
scientists believe. The gas, belched in vast quantities in our world by cows, was detected by orbiting
spacecraft and from Earth using giant telescopes.
The Editor says...
If that is proof of life on Mars, it also proves there is life on nearly every other planet as
Computer viruses make it to orbit.
A computer virus is alive and well on the International Space Station (ISS). Nasa has confirmed that laptops
carried to the ISS in July were infected with a virus known as Gammima.AG. The worm was first detected on
Earth in August 2007 and lurks on infected machines waiting to steal login names for popular online games.
NASA chief vents about agency's fate. In congressional testimony and speeches across the
country, NASA Administrator Mike Griffin has presented the Bush administration's space policy as under
pressure but on track to returning humans to the moon by 2020. His public face has been steadfast.
But privately, the agency chief is far less certain. In a remarkably candid internal e-mail to top
advisers obtained by the Orlando Sentinel, Griffin lashed out last month at the White House for what he
called a "jihad" to shut down the space shuttle, expressed frustration at the lack of funding for a new
moon rocket — and despaired about the future of America's human-spaceflight program.
The Editor asks...
Is it really a "jihad" when taxpayers want to stop throwing money down the drain?
With Russia a Worry for NASA. NASA's ability to send its astronauts to the $100 billion
international space station is in danger of becoming a costly casualty of the Russia-Georgia war. ... NASA
wants to negotiate a contract this year to have Russia's Soyuz spacecraft transport all astronauts traveling
to and from the station during the gap. But first, Congress has to pass a waiver to a 2000 law
forbidding government contracts with nations that help Iran and North Korea with their nuclear programs,
as Russia has done.
Ambitious NASA Probe to Fly
Through Sun's Fringe. Spurred to action by Congress, NASA is finally moving out on an ambitious
mission to send a spacecraft closer to the sun than any has ever gone before. NASA directed the Johns
Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (JHUAPL) to begin preliminary work on a proposed $750 million
Solar Probe mission last month, with plans to launch around 2015 to fly through the sun's corona and study the
stream of charged particles it regularly blasts into space.
1.5 billion dollars down the drain. The
Device NASA Is Leaving Behind: The instrument, which would detect and measure
cosmic rays in a new way, took 500 physicists from around the world 12 years to
build. But with room on the 10 remaining shuttle missions to the space station in
short supply, many fear that it will remain forever warehoused on Earth, becoming the most
sophisticated and costly white elephant of the space era.
Mars Lander Prepares For Final Countdown. [Scroll down] It will be for the first time when
a Mars mission reaches so far north, with the clear purpose of determining whether the Red Planet is a setting
for past or future forms of life. The Mars Lander will examine the soil in place at the surface, at the
icy layer and in between, and will take samples for analysis.
[No mention of the price tag.]
Phoenix to try shake-and-bake once more. In a series of maneuvers that sounds more like cooking class
than research on Mars, scientists said Monday [6/9/2008] they would try one more time to shake bits of the
clumpy Martian soil into a test oven on NASA's Phoenix lander before switching to a backup strategy that called
for dribbling the soil into the oven. ... The Martian soil is proving to be much clumpier — cemented,
in scientific terms — than expected.
Alkaline Soil Sample
From Mars Reveals Presence of Nutrients. Stick an asparagus plant in a pot full of Martian
soil, and the asparagus might grow happily, scientists announced Thursday [6/26/2008]. An experiment on
the Phoenix Mars lander showed the dirt on the planet's northern arctic plains to be alkaline, though not
strongly alkaline, and full of the mineral nutrients that a plant would need.
Mars Phoenix lander finds soil similar to that
in backyards on Earth. The Phoenix lander's first taste test of soil near Mars' north pole
reveals a briny environment similar to what can be found in backyards on Earth, [emphasis added] scientists said today in
Los Angeles. The finding raises hope that the Martian arctic plains could have conditions favorable
for primitive life.
The Editor says...
"Similar?" I don't think so. The soil in my back yard is full of last year's grass and a bunch of
spiders, ants, snails, worms, and the decaying excrement of every dog that has ever lived here. It could
very well be that all the scientists have found — after spending billions of our tax
dollars — is slightly alkaline dirt (or dust) and sterile water.
Update: Mars soil may not be so good for life. New
results from NASA's Phoenix Mars Lander suggest that the surface layers of the Martian arctic region may not
be as friendly to life as initial results suggested, NASA said Monday [8/4/2008]. Two samples analyzed
within the last month suggest that the Martian dirt may contain perchlorate, a highly oxidizing substance,
which would create a harsh environment for any potential life.
soil may not have life after all. Weeks after being billed as fit for growing asparagus, it now
seems the red soil of Mars may not be quite so friendly after all. After days of growing speculation
about an important discovery, NASA finally revealed a secret yesterday. Its Phoenix lander, which touched
down in May, has found not the chemistry of life, but perchlorate — a toxic, highly corrosive compound
used in household cleaners, explosives and rocket fuel that can destroy organic matter.
At last! Proof of life on Mars! WRONG! Mars
Craft Detects Falling Snow. Icy snow falls from high in Mars's atmosphere and may even reach
the planet's surface, scientists working with NASA's Phoenix lander reported yesterday. Laser
instruments aboard the lander detected the snow in clouds about 2½ miles above the surface and
followed the precipitation as it fell more than a mile.
The Editor says...
If snow is found on Mars, that is not proof of life on Mars. Snow is not life.
Will NASA Ever Find Life on
Mars? NASA has long taken an incremental approach to searching for biology, with "follow the
water" as a driving strategy. That means, perhaps to the frustration of some, that the current Phoenix
lander mission and the twin rovers on Mars are not even designed to detect Martian life.
The Editor says...
Why the "incremental approach"? Money, obviously. Once NASA finds Clue #1 and
Clue #2, it just has to send another billion-dollar probe to find Clue #3.
nixes NASA background checks. A federal appeals court ruled Friday [1/11/2008]
that NASA should be blocked from conducting background checks on low-risk employees at its Jet
Propulsion Laboratory, saying the practice threatens workers' constitutional rights.
NASA Wary of Relying on
Russia. The launch of the Jules Verne Automated Transfer Vehicle (ATV) highlights a stark reality:
In 2½ years, just as the station gets fully assembled, the United States will no longer have any spacecraft of
its own capable of carrying astronauts and cargo to the station, in which roughly $100 billion is being invested.
The Editor says...
The logic behind NASA's concern escapes me. Apparently the justification for squandering more money is the fact that
We have invested $100 billion in the space station already. That's like finding out that you're on a dead end
road and refusing to turn around because you've gone so far already.
First View of Mercury's
"Other Face". The first of many planned images from NASA's MESSENGER spacecraft is showing
astronomers a side of Mercury no one's ever seen before. Mercury is tough to view from Earth, since it's
so close to the sun. And when the Mariner 10 probe flew past the innermost planet in 1974 and 1975,
only one side of the body was facing sunlight.
[The article includes no mention of the price tag for these pictures, nor
any explanation of how these new pictures benefit the taxpayers.]
Nasa investigates virtual space.
The US space agency is exploring the possibility of developing a massively multiplayer online
(MMO) game. The virtual world would be aimed at students and would "simulate real Nasa
engineering and science missions".
At last — something important! Boomerangs come back in space, Japanese
astronaut finds. Japanese astronaut Takao Doi has thrown a boomerang in space and found, to the surprise
of many, that it does come back. The 53-year-old conducted an experiment aboard the International Space Station
on Tuesday [3/18/2008], Japanese time, to see whether boomerangs fly back in space.
aim for origami space flight. Japanese scientists and origami masters hope to launch a paper
airplane from space and learn from its trip back to Earth. It's no joke. A prototype passed a
durability test in a wind tunnel this month, Japan's space agency adopted it Wednesday [3/26/2008] for
feasibility studies, and a well-known astronaut is interested in participating.
The Editor says...
It is comical and somewhat surreal to see well-educated men undertake these studies as if the
answers were urgently needed.
Let's go to Mars,
says Nicolas Sarkozy. President Nicolas Sarkozy of France has called for the world to unite to
explore Mars. Speaking during a visit to French Guaiana, Mr Sarkozy called for a coalition of the
willing from Europe, America, Russia and beyond to explore the red planet.
The Editor says...
The Socialist Sarkozy is merely looking for a handout from the U.S. In other words, if there is to be
a trillion dollars spent on a trip to Mars, he wants France to climb aboard the gravy train.
Secrets of 1957 Sputnik launch
revealed. 50 years later, it emerges that the momentous launch was far from being part of a
well-planned strategy to demonstrate communist superiority over the West. Instead, the first artificial
satellite in space was a spur-of-the-moment gamble driven by the dream of one scientist, whose team scrounged
a rocket, slapped together a satellite and persuaded a dubious Kremlin to open the space age.
NASA Awards $1.8 Billion for Moon Mission
Motor. NASA has awarded defense contractor Alliant Techsystems Inc. $1.8 billion to develop
a motor for the Orion capsule, which will replace the space shuttle and be able to reach the moon and Mars, the
Presents Details of Plans for Moon Base. NASA announced new details yesterday [9/20/2007] about
its plans for a Moon base that included a pair of small, pressurized rovers with a range of nearly
600 miles. The space agency plans to return astronauts to the Moon around 2020. Agency
officials first described proposals last December for a polar lunar base powered by near constant
sunlight on solar panels.
We can't all go
to the moon, but our names can. NASA has established a free "Send Your Name to the Moon" Web site that
"enables everyone to participate in the lunar adventure and place their names in orbit around the moon for years to come,"
according to the space agency.
lander blasts off to Mars. NASA's Phoenix Mars lander blasted off on Saturday on a mission
to determine whether icy ground near the planet's north pole could ever have supported life. The
mission launched at 0526 EDT (0926 GMT) on a Delta II rocket from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station
in Florida, US.
[The article includes no mention of the price.]
Where are the PETA people? NASA,
Russia To Study Effects Of Spaceflight On Small Lizards, Snails. According to NASA, the Russian
Foton-M3 mission will launch from Kazakhstan this Friday [9/14/2007], sending an automated Vostok
spacecraft — a heavily modified version of the same basic spaceship that carried Yuri Gagarin into
orbit in 1961 — into low Earth orbit for 12 days. Instead of a human astronaut, however,
the small craft will hold several geckos, newts, and snails.
[And again, the article includes no mention of the pricetag.]
Just another government cover-up... NASA won't disclose
survey of pilots on air safety. An unprecedented national survey of pilots by
the U.S. government has found that safety problems like near collisions and runway
interference occur far more frequently than previously recognized. But the government is
withholding the information, fearful it would upset air travelers and hurt airline profits.
disclose air safety survey. NASA gathered the information under an $8.5 million
safety project, through telephone interviews with roughly 24,000 commercial and general aviation
pilots over nearly four years. Since ending the interviews at the beginning of 2005 and
shutting down the project completely more than one year ago, the space agency has refused to
divulge the results publicly.
NASA Won't Disclose Air Safety Survey.
Among other results, the pilots reported at least twice as many bird strikes, near mid-air collisions
and runway incursions as other government monitoring systems show, according to a person familiar
with the results who was not authorized to discuss them publicly. The survey also revealed
higher-than-expected numbers of pilots who experienced "in-close approach changes" — potentially
dangerous, last-minute instructions to alter landing plans.
[Since when is NASA in charge of airline safety? Isn't that the function of the FAA?]
Update: NASA reluctantly releases airline safety
study. NASA begrudgingly released some results today from an $11.3 million federal air safety
study it previously withheld from the public over concerns it would upset travelers and hurt airline profits.
It published the findings in a format that made it cumbersome for any thorough analysis by outsiders.
[If you wanted to avoid news media coverage, what better time to release
such a study than New Year's Eve?]
postpones the launch of Atlantis. NASA was forced to postpone the scheduled Jan. 10 launch
of shuttle Atlantis so flight engineers can fix the problematic fuel tank sensor system on the shuttle. ... Even
though the shuttle launch is indefinitely delayed, NASA declined to comment on possible future launch dates.
NASA'S Luxury, At Your
Expense. [Scroll down] The awards are to honor workers who've contributed to flight safety.
But it's not just a low-key dinner for a handful of the best and brightest. Try five days and four nights
at a luxury Florida hotel for 300 honorees and their guest. (sic) Fancy receptions and front-row tickets to
the most exciting show in the space business, the shuttle launch. All paid for by your tax dollars.
NASA gives Google founders a coveted parking place for
their private jet. [NASA] confirmed earlier this week that H211, a limited liability company that
counts Google's chief executive, Eric Schmidt, as one of its principals, had secured rights to operate a
refurbished wide-body Boeing 767-200 out of Moffett Field, an airport that is run by NASA and is generally
closed to private aircraft.
Drunk astronauts allowed to fly, admits
panel. A panel has found that astronauts were allowed to fly on at least two occasions despite
warnings they were so drunk they posed a flight risk, Aviation Week reported today on its website. The
publication said the panel set up by NASA to study astronaut health issues reported "heavy use of alcohol"
within 12 hours of launch. It said flight surgeons and other astronauts warned that the drunken
astronauts posed a flight risk when they flew on the two known occasions.
NASA's hangover won't easily go away.
NASA plans to overhaul the way it monitors the behavioral and mental health of its astronauts following findings
that shuttle astronauts in at least two instances were launched into space despite warnings that they posed a
safety risk by being intoxicated.
Update: NASA to begin drug testing for astronauts.
After finding no evidence of astronauts drinking before launching into space, NASA said Wednesday [8/29/2007]
it is considering limited alcohol testing of its employees, including astronauts.
Amid NASA turbulence, Congress stays on
board. With NASA pushing ahead with plans for exploring the moon and Mars, administrator Michael
Griffin acknowledged last week that scandals and reports of astronaut misconduct have "shaken public confidence"
in his agency. Congress, however, is standing by NASA, ignoring a veto threat in an attempt to fund space
endeavors with more money than President Bush's $17.3 billion request for the 2008 fiscal year.
NASA Reports Sabotage of Flight
Computer. A space program worker deliberately damaged a computer that is supposed to fly aboard
shuttle Endeavour in less than two weeks, an act of sabotage that was caught before the equipment was loaded
onto the spaceship, NASA said Thursday [7/26/2007].
Muslim astronaut given
guidelines. Malaysia's first astronaut will blast off into space next month armed with guidelines
from Muslim authorities on how to pray, wash and even be buried in space.
Guidebook issued for
Muslims in space. Malaysia has come up with the world's first comprehensive guidebook for
Muslims in space as its first astronaut prepares to go into orbit next week. The book, Guidelines for
Performing Islamic Rites at the International Space Station, teaches the Muslim astronaut how to perform
ablutions, determine the location of Mecca when praying, prayer times, and how to fast in space, the Star
Buys $19 Million Toilet System. NASA has agreed to pay $19 million for a Russian-built toilet
system for the international space station. The figure may sound astronomical for a toilet in space, but
NASA officials said it was cheaper than building their own. "It's akin to building a municipal treatment
center on Earth," NASA spokeswoman Lynnette Madison said Thursday, explaining the cost of the new toilet system.
The Editor says...
Yes, "it's akin to building a municipal treatment center" for the exclusive use of four or five people.
Spacecraft to examine massive asteroids.
The US spacecraft Dawn, due to launch on Sunday [7/8/2007], will take a close look at two massive asteroids to
try to penetrate the mystery of our solar system's origins 4.6 billion years ago. By examining the
two celestial bodies Ceres and Vesta in the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter, scientists hope the unmanned
Dawn probe will shed light on the earliest moments in the birth of the solar system.
NASA set to launch "Dawn" asteroid
spacecraft. NASA is ready to launch this weekend a spacecraft that will search for clues about the
solar system while traveling to the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter for a rendezvous with two of its
largest asteroids. Dawn is set to blast off Sunday afternoon from Cape Canaveral, Fla., on a Delta II
rocket. The launch caps a tumultuous effort in which the $344 million mission was killed last year
because of cost overruns and technical problems, then brought back online after NASA appeals.
This is no longer news, but it is instructive... Shuttle return may be delayed.
Russian computers that control the international space station's orientation and supply of oxygen and water
have failed, potentially extending the space shuttle's mission — or cutting it short. Russian engineers
are not sure why the computers stopped working. A failure of this type has never occurred before on the
Last try for space station computer reboot.
Space officials said it was so-called secondary power sources that had failed, rather than the German-built
computers themselves or the Russian software that they run on.
The Editor says...
With all the billions of American taxpayer dollars that have been poured into the Space Station,
why is it held in place with German computers running Russian software?
Update: Internal NASA Reports Explain Origins of
June Computer Crisis. The technological — and diplomatic —
lessons of that crisis need to be fully understood and appreciated. Because if the failure
had occurred on the way to Mars, say, it probably would have been fatal, and it will likely be
the same international partnership that builds the hardware for a future Mars mission.
paid $26.6M to Columbia families. NASA paid $26.6 million to the families of seven astronauts
who died aboard space shuttle Columbia — a settlement that has been kept secret for more than
2½ years. The space agency recruited former FBI Director William Webster, also a former federal
judge, to act as a mediator and adviser in negotiating the out-of-court settlements, according to documents
released to the Orlando Sentinel through a federal Freedom of Information Act request.
Columbia's Sacrifice: On February 1, 2003
the Space Shuttle OV-102 Columbia broke apart during reentry and took with it the lives of seven
astronauts. The resulting debris field spread across several states and possibly a portion of
the Pacific Ocean as well. This tragedy left not only an extended debris field and grieving
families, but also left many questions in the minds of those who witnessed it in person as well as
on TV. As a mechanical engineer with an aerospace background, I believe that there are aspects
of the events that took place between 8:45 and 9:00 a.m. EST on February 1st that do not
appear to fit the theories NASA is currently making public. Neither damaged tiles, missing tiles,
or a breach of the shuttles wing itself adequately explain the chain of events that led to the final
catastrophic breakup of the orbiter.
far as why the Columbia was destroyed any analysis or comments regarding politics is outside the
scope of this website and anything written here is pure conjecture. It is very difficult to believe
that anyone in our government would willingly give an order to murder seven astronauts and destroy a
space shuttle. It would be far easier to believe that Columbia's destruction was simply a terrible
accident. Either a test of the HAARP transmitter was being conducted without the knowledge that a
Space Shuttle was reentering the atmosphere or the Columbia was part of a test that went terribly
wrong. The reason for the cover-up is probably to keep the capabilities of the HAARP
NASA Ponders Death, Sex On Mars
Mission. With NASA planning to land on Mars 30 years from now, and with the recent discovery
of the most "Earth-like" planet ever seen outside the solar system, the space agency has begun to ponder some
of the thorny practical and ethical questions posed by deep space exploration.
Rover discovery supports idea life
was possible on Mars: NASA. A soil analysis by the Mars rover Spirit strongly suggests that the
Red Planet was once wet, providing evidence of conditions that might have supported life, NASA scientists said
Monday. Spirit found soil that is rich in silica, and "the processes that could have produced such a
concentrated deposit of silica require the presence of water," it said in a release.
achieves autonomous docking in space. Two free-flying satellites performed the first autonomous
separation and docking for the US on 5 and 6 May. The test was done without any human intervention
as the craft flew nearly 500 kilometres above the planet, and could one day lead to robotic spacecraft that
are able to repair damaged satellites.
On to Mars! The
current American space program has clearly reached a dead end. The construction and maintenance of a
space station, and its regular resupply by space shuttles, have been remarkable achievements, albeit costly ones
in both lives and treasure. But the landing of men on the moon in 1969 and a few subsequent years were the
last really historic steps that NASA took, and the experiments recently devised by high-school students to
occupy the time of astronauts in the space shuttles are little more than insults to the human intelligence.
military wants $10m space-weapon funding. The US Missile Defense Agency wants $10 million to
investigate space-based weapons over the next year. As Pentagon budgets go, it is small change, but it
is also a red flag for critics who worry that such plans could turn space into a shooting gallery.
Satellite to probe mysterious glowing clouds.
NASA is about to launch a spacecraft to study mysterious invaders lurking above Earth's poles — not
UFOs, but the shimmering, high-altitude apparitions known as noctilucent clouds.
NASA Releases 3D Images of Sun.
NASA released the first three-dimensional images of the sun Monday [4/23/2007], saying the photos taken from
twin spacecraft may lead to better predictions of solar eruptions that can affect communications and power
lines on Earth.
[Better predictions? Will it make any difference if we get another 24 hours notice of such an
event? There's still nothing we can do about solar eruptions when they happen. NASA is one of
the few places where people never weigh the cost of new projects versus the benefits, because the
greatest benefit is NASA's continued existence.]
Russians accuse US of sabotaging
satellite during missile tests. According to one unnamed space official quoted by the Russian
Interfax news agency, communications were lost with the Russian satellite on 9 March just as the US was
carrying out missile experiments. A second Russian specialist, also unnamed, gave a different rationale,
arguing it was affected by ground-based tests to knock out spacecraft through wave experiments.
As if the US owns the moon... The Moon opens for business.
The first private Moon landing has finally been given the green light by the US government.
NASA: China could be next to go to
the moon. China's surging space program could launch explorers on the moon before Americans make
a lunar return, NASA Administrator Michael Griffin told a congressional oversight panel Thursday. … That
prompted a round of questions from Rep Ken Calvert, R-Calif., on whether the United States might lose its lead
in space to China. "How good is their space program? … Do you think they have an opportunity to get
to the moon before we do?" Calvert asked.
[Why should we care if China goes to the moon? Is there any justification for a space race in the
absence of a Cold War?]
being shortchanged, congressman charges. The chairman of the U.S. House science committee said
Thursday [3/15/2007] that NASA is headed for "a train wreck" if the space agency isn't better funded to finish
building the international space station and develop the next-generation spacecraft.
[They act as if there is some grave danger to us all if the space station is not maintained and expanded.]
A waste of
space. [The International Space Station is] little more than an updated MIR where scientists
can float around and study the effects of zero gravity. Its major reason for existing seems to be to
give the shuttle fleet a destination. And, in a nice circle of reasoning, the shuttles exist to service
an international space station. How convenient.
Cosmonaut to Hit Golf Ball Into
Orbit. A Russian cosmonaut will whack a golf ball from the international space station in a
publicity stunt on Thanksgiving Day, NASA officials said Tuesday [8/22/2006]. Russian flight engineer
Mikhail Tyurin will show off his swing to promote a Canadian golf club manufacturer during a spacewalk
on November 23.
[At last we know what the Space Station is good for.]
Lockheed Martin wins NASA moon
contract. NASA on Thursday [8/31/2006] gave a multibillion-dollar contract to build a manned
lunar spaceship to Lockheed Martin Corp., the aerospace leader that usually builds unmanned rockets. The
nation's space agency plans to use the Orion crew exploration vehicle to replace the space shuttle fleet,
take astronauts to the moon and perhaps to Mars. Unlike Apollo and earlier spacecraft perched atop
rockets, it will be reusable. NASA estimated the cost at $7.5 billion through 2019 for likely
eight separate spaceships.
Nasa looks to a new frontier by building
telescope on the Moon. The most powerful radiotelescope yet devised is to be built on the Moon,
under plans being put together by Nasa for its 2018 lunar mission. Mike Griffin, the head of the US space
agency, said the construction of a telescope is being "factored into" the mission.
[What is the end product? More research into the origins of the universe, no doubt. No
mention of the price tag, as usual. NASA is pretty obviously struggling to come up with new ways
to spend the taxpayers' money.]
NASA crushes lunar real estate
industry. NASA has confirmed its moon base will not illegally occupy other people's land.
The news deals a crushing blow to the dreams of thousands of idiots, who coughed the cash for their very own
patch of dusty countryside on the moon. NASA announced earlier this week it would start building a
permanent lunar outpost in 2020.
NASA to review process of screening
astronauts. NASA said today [2/7/2007] it would review its psychological screening process
in light of an astronaut's arrest on charges she tried to murder a woman she believed was her romantic rival
for the affection of Discovery astronaut William Oefelein.
hunt for planets. [William Borucki's] proposal was rejected four times by NASA. Then other
delays and budget cuts threatened to scuttle the $500 million effort before it reached the launch pad.
But persistence is paying off for Borucki, 68. The Kepler space telescope is under construction at Ball
Aerospace & Technologies in Boulder, with launch set for November 2008.
NASA Studies Manned Asteroid Mission.
NASA is appraising a human mission to a near-Earth asteroid-gauging the scientific merit of the endeavor while
testing out spacecraft gear, as well as mastering techniques that could prove useful if a space rock ever took
aim for our planet.
Goals Delete Mention of Home Planet. From 2002 until this year, NASA's mission statement,
prominently featured in its budget and planning documents, read: "To understand and protect our
home planet; to explore the universe and search for life; to inspire the next generation of
explorers … as only NASA can." In early February, the statement was quietly
altered, with the phrase "to understand and protect our home planet" deleted.
For $35M, You Too Can Walk in
Space. You don't have to be an astronaut anymore to experience walking in space. All you
need is $35 million and the willingness to risk your life. A private Virginia firm that already
has sent three super-rich men to the international space station for $20 million each announced
Friday [7/22/2006] it would offer an even rarer adventure: A stroll outside the space
station for an extra $15 million.
Nixon was ready to report NASA
deaths. The US was so eager to beat the Soviet Union in the race to the moon that it launched
its 1969 mission before it was ready, and president Richard Nixon even prepared an address to announce the
deaths of the astronauts aboard, a new documentary says.
It's time to go beyond
the shuttle. The hesitance about the coming launch among members of the NASA team responsible
for mission safety is alarming. So was the apparent "reassignment" of one such NASA official who was
a bit too public in expressing his misgivings about mission safety. And the billion-dollar price tag that
American taxpayers have picked up since the last tragic loss of shuttle and crew raises the biggest issue of all.
Ohio, Ala. to Play Bigger Roles for
NASA. Space centers in Ohio and Alabama will get added work as NASA shifts direction from flying
circles around the Earth in a shuttle to zooming to the moon again in a brand new space vehicle.
NASA orbiter arrives at
Mars. A NASA spacecraft successfully slipped into orbit around Mars yesterday
[3/10/2006], joining a trio of orbiters already circling the Red Planet. … The $720 million
mission is managed by the JPL in Pasadena, Calif.
[There were three probes orbiting Mars already? How many of these do we
really need, at $720 million each?]
Missions to the
moon and Mars: The US House of Representatives yesterday [7/22/2005] overwhelmingly
endorsed President Bush's plans to go to the moon and Mars. But the House also insisted
that NASA concentrate on space research and on repairing the Hubble orbiting telescope. The
Hubble, along with science programs and aeronautics research, are popular in Congress – partly
because the contracts generate thousands of jobs, injecting millions into the economies of
many lawmakers' districts.
Scientists find new clue to life on
Mars. A vast, dust-covered ocean of ice is the most likely place to discover life on Mars,
according to a team of British scientists. The frozen ocean was captured by cameras aboard the European
Space Agency's Mars Express probe, which revealed an expanse of pack ice just north of the Martian equator,
in Elysium, a region strewn with dormant volcanoes.
If the European Space Agency is sending probes to Mars, why are we
duplicating the effort?
Scientists object to Bush's
moon-Mars missions. They say the president's two-year-old Vision for Space Exploration
program is gobbling up billions of dollars that they think could be better used for less expensive
projects, including new telescopes and unmanned robots such as the twin rovers on Mars.
[This assumes that the billions of dollars must be spent somewhere.]
NASA to unveil plan for moon mission
in 2018. NASA briefed senior White House officials Wednesday [9/14/2005] on
its plan to spend $100 billion and the next 12 years building the spacecraft and
rockets it needs to put humans back on the Moon by 2018.
to unveil plans for 2018 moon mission. NASA's Crew Exploration Vehicle is expected
to cost $5.5 billion to develop, according to government and industry sources, and the Crew
Launch Vehicle another $4.5 billion. The heavy-lift launcher, which would be capable
of lofting 125 metric tons of payload, is expected to cost more than $5 billion but less
than $10 billion to develop, according to these sources.
Moon Launch for 2018. It will cost $104 billion over the next decade
to send astronauts back to the moon, NASA's chief said Monday [9/19/2005], defending
the price tag as an investment the nation can afford despite the expense of Hurricane
Katrina. Described as "Apollo on steroids," the new moon exploration plan unveiled
by the space agency will use beefed-up shuttle and Apollo parts and aims to put people
on the moon by 2018.
[Suppose NASA lands on the moon again in 2018. What will that accomplish? What
is there to learn about moon rocks that hasn't already been learned?]
Space: The Ultimate
Prize. Recently asked [November 1999] what it would take to return to the
moon, NASA responded by stating, "20 years." Those old enough, recall in
the 1960s that the task took only 10 years when there was no experience and no
technology to achieve it. NASA has evolved into a bureaucracy.
Has a New Era of Space Venture Arrived? The
1967 UN Treaty on Peaceful Uses of Outer Space, which the U.S. government signed, prohibits
claims of national sovereignty on any extraterrestrial body. Moreover, the 1979 Moon Treaty
disallows any private ownership on the moon. The commission reported that the United States "has
not ratified the 1979 Moon Treaty, but at the same time, has not challenged its basic premises
or assumptions." As a result, "the legal status of a hypothetical private company engaged in
making products from space resources is uncertain."
says space shuttle was a mistake. The space shuttle and International Space Station — nearly
the whole of the U.S. manned space program for the past three decades — were mistakes, NASA chief Michael
Griffin said Tuesday [9/27/2005]. … The shuttle has cost the lives of 14 astronauts since the first flight
in 1982. Roger Pielke Jr., a space policy expert at the University of Colorado, estimates that NASA has
spent about $150 billion on the program since its inception in 1971.
Eager to Fix the Problem, But Some Have Doubts. Pete Sepp of the National Taxpayers
Union … called it "ridiculous" that American taxpayers continue to "pour billions" into the
shuttle program as well as the international space station — based on the "circular
logic" that we need to send people into space to see how they act in space.
backs Bush on space quest. The House on Friday overwhelmingly endorsed President Bush's
vision to send astronauts back to the moon and eventually on to Mars as it passed a bill to
set NASA policy for the next two years.
inspiration in space-based socialism. NASA will cost taxpayers
$16.2 billion in fiscal 2005, up $822 million from 2004. That
is an astronomical sum, considering not only the less-than-stellar returns NASA
has yielded Americans recently, but also this year's projected deficit of
$348 billion (to be piled atop a $7.4 trillion national debt).
Our Future in
Space. A truly bold vision of the future of space exploration for America
would place private space entrepreneurs at the forefront. Like other industries (e.g.
semiconductors, biotech, and the internet), the federal government played a significant early
role in demonstrating key technologies. But these industries flourished when entrepreneurs
stepped in and took the reins. We are now at that point with the exploration of space.
[Perhaps Muslims shouldn't be in space at all. How would you know if you're really bowing
toward Mecca in a zero-g environment, where the floor is the same as the ceiling? How
would you know, at any given moment, that you weren't also bowing toward Jerusalem,
or New York, or Hell itself?]
Cutting Out HUD,
NASA and Other Losers. The civilian space program is a 21st century
version of Franklin Roosevelt's Works Progress Administration (WPA) program, a boondoggle
that provides employment on useless projects. It is nothing more than high-class
welfare for scientists and engineers and the domestic aerospace industry.
Editor's Note: The article
above is just one of several excellent articles
by Jim Grichar in which he
lists dozens of federal agencies that should be trimmed or eliminated.
Hamstrings NASA'S Mission. Originally, the shuttle was expected to be a
cheap way to transport people back and forth into space. At just $5 million
per launch, it would supposedly open space up to all sorts of possibilities. However,
the space shuttle program has not exactly lived up to our original expectations. To begin
with, the cost per launch is actually 100 times higher than originally
projected — at $500 million per trip.
Nickels and dimes add up: NASA Employs a Performance Artist
with a $20,000 Taxpayer-Funded Stipend. For two years, NASA paid Laurie Anderson as the
agency's "artist in residence." The performing artist was commissioned to perform a theatrical
story-telling piece in theaters across the nation, as part of a NASA outreach effort. The artist
in residence position was not specifically authorized by Congress. … Her job Description:
Create and tour a theatrical piece, educating theater-goers about NASA; and "…to produce a film
on the moons of the solar system" for the 2005 World Expo.
Why Do We Have A MANNED
Space Program? As Poul Anderson put it in a 1984 lecture, Space: Promises
and Problems, "The average man is not dumb; he's perfectly able to see that sending
men to the moon is a rather roundabout and expensive way of producing a teflon frying
pan, especially considering that teflon was already in existence." There are
too many worthy research programs, such as on aircraft icing, that are notoriously
underfunded, and too much of the manned space budget goes for repetitive "operations"
that have little to do with technology development.
Moon and Mars Missions are Not a Priority
for Taxpayers. The President's initiative was left for dead in the summer of 2004 after a lukewarm
reception from the public and deep skepticism from prominent scientists. But funding for the initiative
was included at the last minute in the fiscal 2005 omnibus bill. For fiscal 2006, House appropriators
have marked up NASA's budget at $16.5 billion including $3.1 billion for the moon/Mars initiative
which is $275 million above fiscal 2005 levels and $15 million above the President's budget request.
Scrap The Shuttle Program. The
shuttle is far more expensive than expendable rockets used for the Apollo program the
1960s. The orbiter and solid rocket boosters are recovered for reuse, but an army of
engineers must inspect and rebuild them for the next mission. As a result, plans
for 100 shuttle missions a year have fallen to around four, costing $550 million
each and employing 30,000 people.
Don't Lavish Funds on NASA. After
NASA sold the nation on the space shuttle as an inexpensive, reusable lifter, the cost of
hefting a pound of payload into space, accepting NASA's accounting, soared from $3,800 in the
1960s Apollo program to $6,000 (in constant dollars). When Alex Rowland of Duke University
included the development and capital costs of the shuttle, the cost rocketed to $35,000
per pound. NASA's costs went up when the cost of just about everything else — megabytes
of computer memory, airline tickets, shipping a barrel of oil — were falling in real
dollars. The difference between NASA's rising costs and the falling costs elsewhere
is that computer makers, airlines, and oil shippers are in competitive markets.
Time to Privatize NASA. The
inflation-adjusted cost of commercial air travel has dropped by about 30 percent since the
late 1970s, when airline deregulation began. And the cost of shipping oil has dropped by as much
as 80 percent in a little over two decades. But the government's reusable shuttle has actually
made spaceflight more expensive.
Interesting web site: Space Projects dot com: "A bilingual,
international directory of nearly everything space-related, including constructive reform proposals
[by ex-NASA personnel] focused on making space access far more affordable."
Somewhat related article: Scuttle
the shuttle program. After Columbia clearly had disintegrated, NASA briefers
characterized the occurrence as "a contingency." This mirrored the language of football
coaches characterizing ruptured spleens and broken limbs as "bumps and bruises." Then
followed suggestions to media that budget cuts inflicted by White House and Congress might
have compromised shuttle safety. This crass, self-serving reaction was quickly
replaced, however, by another football coach-like reaction: NASA would have to get
the shuttles back into space again, as the dead astronauts would have wanted it.
This just in:
finds a frozen orange world. The Huygens probe, part of a $3 billion joint
mission involving NASA and the European and Italian space agencies, made its pioneering descent
to Titan on Friday [1/14/2005], sending back readings on the moon's atmosphere, composition
and landscape. … Scientists believe a study of the icy moon could yield clues about how
life developed on Earth.
Editor's Note: As
I was saying at the top of this page, NASA's only remaining mission is the never-ending search for
theories about the origin of the universe. Any theory will do, as long as it disagrees with
the first chapter of the Bible. There is no end to this sort of theorization.
news in NASA survey. More than a year after the loss of space shuttle
Columbia, NASA workers are still afraid to speak up about safety concerns, according
to a survey released Monday [4/12/2004] that places much of the blame on
the agency's leadership.
quits with NASA finances in chaos. As NASA sets course for
the moon and Mars, the space agency's finances are in disarray, with
significant errors in its last financial statements and inadequate
documentation for $565 billion posted to its accounts, its former
Last Days? NASA is still mired in the old "throw money away" method of space
travel. Testing such expensive equipment [as the X-43A] and throwing it away is wasteful,
as if millions of dollars that went into it were nothing, and the jet itself, after the test,
was of no more value than a model airplane.
Troubles NASA: A 248-page report issued by a 13 member board on the
Columbia space shuttle accident makes 29 important recommendations to ensure the
safe return of the shuttle for use in America's space program. However,
there is nothing new in this report.
China [is trying] to buy the
moon. A company has set up operations in China to sell land on the moon for 289 yuan ($45) an
acre, cashing in on renewed interest in space travel after the successful five-day voyage of
the Space Program. Phase out government involvement in space exploration,
and the free market will work to produce whatever there is demand for.
Birthday: While space is indeed challenging, there's no excuse for
many of the management mistakes that have given us near-sighted telescopes, misguided
space probes, the fiery loss of billions of dollars of hardware with its crews, and
most tragically, the squandering of billions of dollars, and irreplaceable years, on
mismanaged and misbegotten programs that were ostensibly to reduce the cost of space
flight, but instead ended up lining the pockets of contractors while delivering,
at best, hangar queens.
The space shuttle is a major polluter.
The Shuttle is the largest of the solid fuel rockets, with twin 45 meter boosters. All solid fuel rockets
release large amounts of hydrochloric acid in their exhaust, each Shuttle flight injecting about 75 tons
of ozone destroying chlorine into the stratosphere. Those launched since 1992 inject even more
ozone-destroying chlorine, about 187 tons, into the stratosphere (which contains the ozone layer).
NASA. Throughout its existence, the most rewarding aspect of the space program has been sticking
it to the Russians. With the ending of the Cold War, this motivation no longer applies. What then
are we getting out of the program which will consume $86 billion dollars over the next five years?
Tragically it seems these days that the only time the space program is grabbing top headlines is when
[We just can't stop the manned space program at that point. When astronauts get killed
in the line of duty, we must press on, because "that's what they would have wanted." This is an example
of decision making based upon emotion rather
NASA Hopes to Spur Commercial Space
Growth. The U.S. space agency is sponsoring a competition in which winning companies will
get $500 million in seed money to develop space vehicles that NASA will never design, build or
own. Like a U-Haul truck rental, NASA instead will merely lease them on a per-trip basis for
sending cargo and eventually crew to the international space station.
$500 million in "seed money"? Sounds like an enormous SBA loan. Maybe NASA's should be called
the Large Business Administration. This still sounds like pork barrel politics and a busy-work project
for rocket scientists, because there still is no end product in sight, other than support of the space
probe hits comet. At a cost of $330 million, Deep Impact is the eighth mission
in NASA's Discovery Program, which supports low-budget science missions.
$333 million is the price of a low-budget mission!
Impact: NASA hopes the core of the Tempel 1 comet may hold cosmic clues to
how the sun and planets formed.
Permit me to reiterate: Every NASA mission — whether it's the Mars
lander looking desperately for water, Deep Impact hitting a comet, or just flying
around in circles for several days at a time — has as its goal something
having to do with gathering clues about the origins of the solar system. After decades
of these projects, what new clues are there? Does NASA have any tangible end product?
Some estimate the cost of Deep Impact at $333 million.
Others, perhaps rounding down, say $330 million.
Update: NASA Announces Another Comet Mission. The
University of Maryland-led team that produced the spectacular Deep Impact mission, which smashed an impactor
into Comet Tempel 1 in July, 2005, hopes new information gathered from Comet Boethin will help coalesce
the vast array of new cometary information into solid ideas about the nature of comets, how they formed and
evolved and if they have played a role in the emergence of life on Earth.
Comet Dust Capsule Lands In
Utah. The mission, managed by NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, cost $212 million.
Stardust's return to Earth was the reverse of the ill-fated Genesis mission that carried solar wind
Stardust of yesterday. Scientists
believe comets are icy, rocky debris left over from the beginning of the solar system 4.5 billion
years ago. … They expect that analysis of the Stardust samples will help them better understand
how the planets formed and evolved.
Capsule Brings First Comet
Dust to Earth. After a seven-year journey, a NASA space capsule returned safely to Earth on
Sunday [1/15/2006] with the first dust ever fetched from a comet, a cosmic bounty that scientists hope will
yield clues to how the solar system formed.
And now, on to the next frivolous project:
Spacecraft Zooms Toward Pluto. The New Horizons spacecraft blasted off aboard an
Atlas V rocket Thursday afternoon [1/19/2006] in a spectacular start to the
$700 million mission. Despite the speed – it can reach
36,000 mph – it will take 9½ years to reach Pluto and the
frozen, sunless reaches of the solar system.
... and the price tag for this boondoggle is $700 million.
could open door on extra dimension. An exotic theory, which attempts to unify the laws of
physics by proposing the existence of an extra fourth spatial dimension, could be tested using a satellite
to be launched in 2007. Such theories are notoriously difficult to test. But a new study suggests
that such hidden dimensions could give rise to thousands of mini-black holes within our own solar
system — and the theory could be tested within Pluto's orbit in just a few years.
of Genesis disappoints. Genesis held hundreds of fragile silicon
wafers embedded with microscopic bits of the sun's surface. They were precious cargo,
collected during the spacecraft's three-year, $264 million mission to unlock
mysteries of the solar system's formation.
Board To Investigate Crash Of Spacecraft. One of the men who got an up
close look at the Genesis space probe that crashed Wednesday in Utah said the outer
shell and the canister with solar particles opened when it hit the desert. A
drogue parachute and a parafoil that were supposed to allow helicopters to capture
the delicate samples apparently did not fire, allowing the 500-pound craft to smash
into the desert.
There goes another $264 million down the drain in an attempt to gather information to
support a new theory about the origin of the universe. Is there no one at NASA
or in the US Congress who can (or will) veto an idea like this before any money is spent
on it? How many more missions of this sort are already underway?
Update: Genesis slammed to Earth
after parachutes failed. A report released Tuesday [6/13/2006] blamed a design flaw for the
2004 crash of a NASA space probe carrying solar wind atoms back to Earth and criticized engineers for failing
to detect the error. The 231-page document prepared by independent investigators found that gravity
switches on the Genesis probe designed to trigger the deployment of its parachutes were installed
[At first you might ask, "Doesn't somebody check things like that during construction? A better
question would be, "How many people were fired as a result of this?" I would guess the answer would be
a maximum of two people. The actual number will probably be closer to zero.]
Again I say, it is time
to pull the plug on
NASA and privatize or terminate everything NASA does. It was the
coolest science project of the 1960's, and it was a peaceful way to show
the other superpowers that we had big rockets and fast computers, but the
Cold War is over, and there is no reason — other than
shameless pork barrel spending — to keep NASA around forever.