Barack H. Obama was a man without a history when he was elected, but now he has a track record, and it stinks. President Obama is the closest we've come to a
socialist president in American history.*
He appears to be systematically dismantling the American economy.*
He is doing everything in his power to choke off the energy supplies to this country — at least the ones that are cheap and abundant, like coal, oil, and natural
gas.* He has squandered billions of
dollars on leftist utopian fantasies like green jobs,*
windmills,* solar
panels,* food
stamps,* electric
cars,* bullet
trains,* and fluorescent light
bulbs.* He is the most pro-abortion
president in American history.*
He has used the power of his office — and has assumed powers that he doesn't really have — to attack
Boeing,* Gibson
Guitar,* the Catholic
church,* Inspector
General Gerald Walpin,* Fox
News Channel,* British
Petroleum,* and his "tea party"
opposition.*
He is up to his neck in scandals, including "Fast and
Furious",*
Solyndra,* preferential treatment of
the Black Panthers,* an assortment of
"czars" who make his decisions for him,*
the use of a fraudulent Social Security number,*
revealing the exact number of U.S. nuclear warheads to the Russians,*
going to war in Libya without consulting the Congress,*
playing golf when he should be working,*
going on expensive vacations several times a year,*
accepting clearly fraudulent campaign contributions from obviously fictitious people like Doodad
Pro,* requiring everyone to
purchase medical insurance,*
weakening America's military services,*
granting INTERPOL immunity from U.S. law,*
maintaining double-digit unemployment (if you look at the real numbers instead of the phony official
numbers),* and presenting a forged birth
certificate as his own.*
How could he possibly overcome all that baggage and win re-election? The answer is quite simple: Mr. Obama's re-election depends on
persuading a large number of people with emotional appeals rather than an evaluation of his first-term performance. He also needs to get as many
people as possible to sign up for food stamps, low-interest student loans, and unemployment benefits as he can. Buying votes, in other words.
He also depends on the votes of dead people and fictitious voters, which is why he is so vehemently opposed to Voter ID
laws.*
Millions of people don't care about any of the above, but they start to pay attention when gasoline prices
rise.* That alone
might be enough to make Barack H. Obama a one-term president.
Presidents
Day: Government vacations, Islamists flourish, GM flounders. The positive message that carried the 2012 national election for Barack Obama
and Joe Biden was simple: "Osama bin Laden is dead and General Motors is alive". Now we know the slogan that swayed 65.4 million
Obama-Biden voters is one part false premise, the other part whopping lie.
The dismantling of Barack Obama.
Like a cornered dog, the president has only one option — strike out, attack. Forget the "hope and change" of 2008, 2012 will be "slash
and burn," blame whoever you can.
Barack Obama's October Surprises.
In October 1972, and twelve days before the presidential election, Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger made a surprise announcement of a peace
agreement ending the war in Vietnam, thus giving birth to the term "October Surprise." In nearly every election cycle since, one party
or the other has attempted to spring some last minute opposition research or policy announcement in the immediate weeks prior to an election.
However the Democrats, with their near stranglehold on the mainstream media, have been overwhelmingly more successful in the use of this strategy.
That is until this year.
Rich Man, Poor Man. "Mankind is divided into
rich and poor, into property owners and exploited," Joseph Stalin asserted in a 1937 interview with H.G. Wells. [...] That same
crude idea of perpetual class warfare seems to be the primary foundation of Barack Obama's re-election campaign, if not his entire
presidency. The president is not just asking the rich to pay their fair share — he is demeaning them and dismissing
their accomplishments as well.
Obama's Struggle. On the campaign trail, Michelle Obama
often employs the word "struggle." It was actually Mrs. Obama's peculiar pronunciation — "shtruggle" — that
first drew my attention to the frequency of her usage. At the 2012 Democratic National Convention, her speech referred to some form of
"struggle" nine times.
The Obama Campaign's Racial Slander
Strategy. Most Americans agree with Romney's policies. So the progressives are playing the race card. To the
Democrats and the mainstream media, this is war. They now have the political power to advance their leftist ideology and they will
stop at nothing to keep it. The progressives aren't merely playing the race card. They are deploying the entire deck
in a scorched-earth policy. If you oppose the Democrats, then you are a racist.
Halperin: Obama Can't Let the Voters Focus on the Economy!
I continue to marvel that we have a presidential campaign unfolding in which one candidate is openly trying to keep the "conversation" away from the topic that is far and away the
most important priority to most voters.
Is the Country Unraveling? Barack Obama has lost the American
center and now he is reduced to the argument that Mitt Romney would be even worse than he has been, as he tries to cobble together an us-versus-them 51%
majority from identity groups through cancelling the Keystone Pipeline, granting blanket amnesty, ginning up the "war on women," and flipping on gay
marriage.
Why Obama's Five
Campaign Themes Fail. So far, we've seen President Obama's reelection team telegraph five central
campaign "themes." None of them has anything to do with his record as president, and all of them are
nonstarters that are easily refuted by the facts: [For example, #1] Mitt Romney is "too rich" to be
president. Mitt Romney's net worth is almost identical ($250 million) to the Democratic Party's 2004
nominee, John Kerry ($240 million). If Democrats had no problem with a rich guy running for president
in 2004, why now?
Obama Dog-Eater Joke of the Day. The Obama
campaign seriously intended to make an issue of the fact that decades ago, Mitt Romney put the family dog on the roof of his car, in some sort of kennel or
container, because there was no room inside. The dog was fine, but the Democrats crowed that focus group testing showed that the incident would make
voters dislike Romney. I think that claim was sheer fantasy, but in any event, the Democrats won't be able to talk about Seamus now that everyone
knows that Obama used to eat dogs.
ObamaCare Left Out of New Obama Ad
About First Term Accomplishments. Team Obama is out with a new swing state ad touting President Obama's accomplishments during his first term. [...] If the
Supreme Court upholds ObamaCare in June, you can bet the campaign will start using the legislation as a talking point, but until then, they're holding off.
Obama's Views on
Distraction Have Evolved, Too. Remember how candidate Barack Obama complained in 2008 that any discussion not
involving the economy was a "distraction"? This time, his entire campaign is built on distracting voters from the economy.
Obama Solidifies the GOP Base for
Romney. The rationale behind President Obama's decision to flip-flop on gay marriage and come out in favor of the idea isn't any mystery.
Democratic strategists rightly believe that any issue — no matter how divisive — that diverts attention from a failing economy is good
for the president's re-election campaign.
No gaiety for Obama. In some respects, the
homosexual "marriage" issue is a diversion. Jobs and the economy are overwhelmingly the top issues in every poll of national priorities,
usually followed by the federal budget deficit. Some commentators have suggested Mr. Obama's train wreck of a stand was designed to take
attention away from the dismal economy, which it won't.
Romney team to paint Obama as lousy
businessman. The Romney campaign wants to introduce a new concept into the debate over President Obama's economic record. Imagine the
president ran an investment firm. He poured billions of dollars into green energy projects that didn't work. People lost jobs. He poured
billions into sometimes implausible stimulus projects that didn't work, either. And even when he succeeded in keeping companies afloat, as he did with
General Motors and Chrysler, he did it by downsizing and laying off thousands of workers. And now, with that record, the president is attacking Mitt
Romney for a successful career as a private equity investor at Bain Capital.
The political strategy behind Obama's commencement
addresses. There appears to be a decidedly political spin in the choices that President Obama, his wife and members of his administration have made in
selecting from many invitations where to deliver commencement speeches this year. Most will be speaking, or have already spoken at, educational institutions in
so-called "battleground states." These are states where the 2012 presidential election is tight and some 102 electoral votes are up for grabs.
Barack Obama's 15 Minutes of Fame. The
Obama re-election campaign is attempting to hold together a fragile coalition of minorities almost solely on the strength of Obama's now endangered
celebrity status. [...] They include the following: radical environmentalists; those heavily dependent on the federal government for their
subsistence; illegal immigrants who favor continuing the administration's policies of providing sanctuary and funding for those here illegally;
women bent on convincing other women that being a woman consists precisely of not doing those things that women have traditionally done to maintain
and define their families; the rapidly shrinking number of union members; and gender-based minorities.
Obama's Bain Attacks
Could Backfire. The ham-handed Barack Obama campaign attack ads on Mitt Romney's former firm Bain Capital have drawn a
lot of ire from other Democrats. And not just because they were sloppily fact-checked (the ads hit Romney for layoffs long after
he left Bain) and because a leading Obama money bundler is a Bain executive himself.
Obama struggles with campaign
theme. Obama formally launched his campaign this month with the message of "Forward," but one senior Democratic
Party official told The Hill that people who thought that would be the campaign's lasting official slogan should "stay tuned."
Obama at various times over the past year has taken "Winning the Future," "A Fair Shot," "An America Built to Last," and "We Can't
Wait" for test drives, but none has found lasting traction. Vice President Biden has suggested one possible bumper sticker
slogan: "GM's alive; bin Laden's dead."
November Surprise? Last week, I wrote about how the
sequester will trigger the WARN Act, which requires employers to warn staff of pending layoffs a minimum of 60 days in advance. That means
potentially hundreds of thousands of public and private sector workers would receive layoff warning notices on November 2 — 60 days
before sequestration hits, and just five days before the presidential election. [...] So you may not be too shocked to learn that the administration
might be pressuring employers to delay these notices until after Election Day.
You belong to the government
Charlotte Motto for
DNC: We Make It Possible. The Obama campaign is completely tone-deaf. The DNC will be held in Charlotte,
North Carolina, and guess what mantra is featured in Charlotte's banners all over the city during the convention? "We
make it possible." The last time a four-word phrase became the Obama mantra it didn't do so well: You Didn't Build
That. Now, that insult to the independent-minded American has been given new impetus by telling people that "WE" make it
possible. YOU need OUR help.
DNC Opens
with the Declaration 'Government Is The Only Thing We All Belong To'. Tonight [9/4/2012], the Democratic National Convention
officially got under way — and the party of "You Didn't Build That," "We Made It Possible," record food stamp enrollment,
nationalized health care, and record deficits opened its gala with a video declaration that "Government is the only thing we all
belong to."
The Editor says...
No, no, no. The government belongs to us. You and I don't belong to the government unless we are slaves, and I am not a slave.
Obama
Camp Disavows 'Government Is The Only Thing That We All Belong To' Video. A video that aired Tuesday night [9/4/2012] at
the Democratic National Convention proclaiming that "government is the only thing that we all belong to" is getting strong reaction from
conservatives, and the Obama campaign is disavowing involvement in the production, BuzzFeed reports. The video, entitled "Welcome to
Charlotte," includes other proclamations like: "We do believe you can use government in a good way."
The Editor asks...
Are we supposed to believe that Obama's team didn't see that video clip before the convention?
DNC video: "Government is the
only thing we all belong to". One of the worst monsters from the Democrat id unfortunately escaped to rampage across the
forbidden planet of their convention on Monday, and had to be brought down with concentrated blasts of denial. The DNC played a
video that included the unfortunate line, "Government is the only thing we all belong to."
Democrats Derail Their Message.
The Democrats clearly intended to have a focused message for tonight's coverage of their convention: Democrats won't bend an inch in
their support of universal access to abortions, Republican obstructionism is responsible for all the country's ills, Mitt Romney was
callous towards the military by not mentioning Afghanistan in his acceptance speech, and the GOP war on women is unending. But
some flies landed in the ointment. A curious party video intoned, "Government's the only thing we all belong to." Talk
about worshiping the omnipotence of the state.
Forward
That's the best they can do? This is an emotional appeal to shallow thinkers. Who wants to keep going forward over a cliff?
The United States is nearly bankrupt, thanks to massive spending by both political parties, and it's time to slam on the brakes and make a sharp
right turn. Nobody who examines the facts would want to continue on the current trajectory.
Comrades! Obama's New Slogan:
Forward! The Obama campaign's new re-election slogan for 2012 is "Forward." It's related to MSNBC's "Lean
Forward," and, of course, to Mao Zedong's "Great Leap Forward," which had the opposite result.
Forward, eh,
Obama campaign? The Obama campaign has its new slogan. And that slogan is: "Forward." What happened?
Was "Reply-All" taken? Maybe "Forward" makes sense, given that the theme of the reelection effort has been Vaguely Creepy E-mails
You Don't Want.
Obama is headed anywhere but forward. We're all
familiar with Obama's penchant for deflecting responsibility and blaming his policy failures on George W. Bush, but
after more than three years in office for Obama, it has gone from childish mischief to juvenile delinquency.
Forward, Comrades!
Communist leaders frequently used — and still use — the word "forward" as an imperative verb, not as an adverb,
usually at the conclusion of speeches or articles. It conveys a spirit of collective action and unity — as well as
the conviction of the left that its ideas represent progress. The term also has military connotations, evoking an order to
charge on the battlefield — and it has been used that way, both for good and ill.
The Forwardism Disease. The Obama slogan for
2012 is in and it's "Forward", which is a compact version of that old classic, "Don't change horses in the middle of a stream"
that every incumbent is forced to run on sooner or later. Forward implies that there's no alternative but to go backward,
which is a place that no right-thinking person wants to go.
Obama Steals Mao's Slogan. The Obama
campaign has picked a portion of one of the most infamous socialist slogans of 20th century history to use as its own new campaign
slogan. "Forward" is the new Obama slogan, Team Obama borrowing boldly from none other than the late Communist Party of
China leader Chairman Mao. Mao's slogan? "The Great Leap Forward."
'Forward' into a March of Mayhem. Barack Obama and
Mitt Romney spoke to college kids last week; as expected, their messages were strikingly different. Romney's message was the
message of entrepreneurship and taking risks. Obama's message was the message of let go and let the government take
care of you.
Obama 'Forward' campaign
slogan inspires Wikipedia editing war. GOP presidential hopeful Mitt Romney ... isn't the only one trying to make hay
over Obama's head-scratcher of a choice on Monday. A Wikipedia page exploring the historical significance of the word "Forward"
as a socialist rallying cry has made it the subject of dueling snarks from assorted would-be Wiki editors and vandals. Within
hours of the Obama campaign's slogan unveiling, the online page had its first edit since November 2011. "Forward is the official
slogan of the Barack Obama presidential campaign, 2012," the simple entry read.
Decoding
Obama's Leftist Campaign Codewords. The Obama campaign's new slogan, "Forward," has long ties to Marxism and communism.
Coincidence? Not likely. This president has a habit of speaking in code to fellow travelers.
Obama campaign slogan mercilessly
mocked. The Obama campaign released a lengthy web video on Monday under the title, "Forward." Perhaps not as catchy
as the "hope and change" mantra of 2008, the slogan was mocked on Wednesday [5/2/2012] by presumptive GOP nominee Mitt Romney.
The Party of Julia. A week ago the
Obama re-election campaign unveiled a slogan for the fall campaign — its answer to Ronald Reagan's "Morning in America," Bill Clinton's "bridge to
the 21st century," and other successful re-election pitches. There were reports that the slogan-writing process had been a struggle for the
White House, and the final product bore those rumors out. "Forward," the Obama campaign will be declaiming to Americans, which feels like a
none-too-subtle admission that a look backward at the Obama economic record might be bad news for the president's re-election prospects.
Is America Moving "Forward" With Barack
Obama? There are similarities between Obama's "Forward," and liberal TV network MSNBC's slogan "Lean Forward;" Communist Chinese Dictator
Mao Zedong's "The Great Leap Forward;" and "Spring Forward," the slogan used by communist Russia Dictator Vladimir Lenin.
'Forward!' with Obama, Axelrod, Jarrett and Frank
Marshall Davis. Conservatives have noted the communist/socialist roots of the slogan. It began with an article in the Washington Times by Victor
Morton, titled, "New Obama slogan has long ties to Marxism, socialism." The article noted that "Forward!" has a "long and rich association" with Marxism:
"Many Communist and radical publications and entities throughout the 19th and 20th centuries had the name 'Forward!' or its foreign cognates." The article
noted that even Wikipedia "has an entire section called 'Forward (generic name of socialist publications).'"
Forward! Turns out that "forward" in
Italian is "avanti," which happened to be the name of the official rag of the Italian Socialist Party in the first half of the twentieth
century. From 1912 to 1915 its editor was some guy named Mussolini. "Forward" in German is "vorwärts" and in Russian
"vperyod." These, too, were the names of socialist newspapers of the same era. The former was the principle organ of the
Social Democratic Party of Germany. On its pages appeared the work of Engels and Trotsky, among other socialist intellectuals.
"Vperyod" was the name of a publication founded by Vladimir Lenin in 1905. The word also appeared in the title of the newspaper
"Forward for Stalin". Presently it is the name of a radical left-wing political organization in Russia.
Obama's Slogan 'Forward' Is Used By
Socialists Too. There is a modern parallel to Obama's new campaign slogan, "Forward!" It is the motto of the modern Socialist Movement
"Forward!" (translated: "Vperiod!"), founded in Russia in 2005. Its declared goal is the socialist transformation of society. In March 2011, the
Socialist movement Forward officially merged with another organization, Socialist Resistance, to create the Russian Socialist movement. Its website
states that the organization provides a joint platform for the anti-capitalist left.
Romney: Obama's
'forward' slogan 'absurd'. Likely Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney said Tuesday President Barack Obama
is out of touch with Americans' struggles through the Great Recession. The recession erased two decades of American wealth
in three years, with a typical family's net worth falling nearly 40 percent, the Federal Reserve said.
Forward! With Obama,
Axelrod, Jarrett, and Frank Marshall Davis. [Scroll down] Obama and Axelrod are geniuses at coming up with words and phrases
that seem vague and benign to the larger population — especially to the ignorant independents/moderates who elected Obama in
2008 — but which resonate with a hard left that understands the deeper meaning completely. That was certainly true for the "change"
slogan. Those of us savvy to this stuff know the underlying message in "change." We interpret it the way that progressives and Fabian
socialists and, yes, communists, understand it. If Obama and Axelrod spent a lot of time with these Chicago influences and circles, they could
have easily picked up the slogan "Forward!"
Obama's Communist Mentor. Americans have lived through nearly four years
of what can only be described as an attempt to take over our government and "fundamentally transform" it away from the limits of the Constitution to a
nation in which the government, under Obama, seized General Motors to nationalize it, imposed Obamacare to take control of our healthcare system, and
attacked "millionaires and billionaires" as greedy capitalists. His slogans have been "change" and "forward", longtime favorites of communists.
Obama Now Chasing The
Crowds. The Obama For America campaign slogan is now "Forward," which is deliciously ironic given its laser-like
focus on traveling back in time.
The Democrats' Dog Whistle Slogan.
Speaking of moving forward, "Forward" itself is one of these dying euphemisms upon which the Obama team has staked its bold pitch for a
chance to finish the job of disemboweling the constitutional republic. "Forward," closely tied to the idea of "progress," is a
well-known leftist battle cry, rooted in Marxist dialectical materialism, with its notion of history's inexorable march towards the
workers' paradise. "Forward" has a distinguished pedigree among communists and socialists. The idea that no one among
the White House staff or campaign apparatus was aware of this unfortunate association with Marx, Engels, Trotsky, Lenin, and Mao is
absurd. One wonders whether any of these people were not aware of it.
Obama's Slogan. Forward is collectivist's
language — a summons to the masses to undertake some heroic advancement in support of a shared goal — or
presumably so. A sane person doesn't say "Forward" to just one person; nor does a battlefield commander order a single
soldier to "Charge." Forward is spoken by the one to the many. Since Forward became the Obama
campaign slogan in April, its popularity with socialist regimes has been noted, as well as how it diverts attention away
from Obama's failures in office.
Allen West
Calls Obama's 'Forward' Campaign Slogan "Marxist-Socialist". During the Republican Jewish Coalition rally in
Boca Raton, Florida, Congressman Allen West [...] slammed President Obama's 'Forward' campaign slogan by calling it a
"Marxist-Socialist theme" used at the turn of the 20th century by the Soviet Union.
Julia
Socialist Democrats want as many people as possible to depend on the government for handouts, like food stamps, unemployment checks,
public housing, "free" cell phones, school lunches, Head Start babysitting services, clothing allowances, and other perquisite goodies.
Programs like SNAP, TANF, SSI and SCHIP reward people who are too lazy to work and encourage single women to give birth to illegitimate
children. The government takes one-quarter to one-third of your paycheck and gives it to the deadbeats. If you don't like it,
don't vote for Obama!
What's so amusing about the "Julia" propaganda cartoon is the assortment of
parody and ridicule that immediately sprang up on the internet in response. The Obama team should have predicted the backlash, but
that would require thinking ahead.
The
Free-Stuff Primary: What Democrats' Promises Will Cost. Six months before President Obama's 2012
reelection, his campaign released an online slideshow. It was not an effort that helped him win. Called "The Life
of Julia," it was an imaginary story complete with slick graphics and digestible talking points designed to illustrate "how
President Obama's policies help one woman over her lifetime — and how Mitt Romney would change her story."
The timeline showed the mythical Julia growing up, graduating from college, building a business, giving birth, and eventually
retiring. For every major milestone, a federally subsidized government program was there to help. Democrats saw
Julia as illustrating the promise of a second Obama term under a caring and effective government. Republicans, on the
other hand, gleefully discovered a ready-made, cradle-to-grave narrative about the dangers of Big Government.
Gates
Pushes InBloom's Massive Data Tracking System for Everyone in America. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
gave $100 million to fund a mega database to collect private information on every American school child from early education
through high school. He is also funding studies to prove the need for tracking students through college and into their
adult life. His thinking falls in line with The Life of Julia, one of Mr. Obama's campaign's socialist selling
points. The Life of Julia imposes the government into the life of every person from birth until death. The
"benevolent" government will be in a surrogate parental role under this type of system. Julia's life is completely
governed by the State and noticeably absent are parents, family, friends, and self-sufficiency.
Pajama Boy: The Obama Machine's Id.
The Obama administration isn't doing very well with putting an empathetic face on its calamitous health-insurance law, is it? First, we had Julia, the
creepy, eyeless, vision-of-horror from Brave New World whose life was run from cradle to grave by the federal government. Then, we had Adriana, the
painfully neutral and carefully ambi-racial stock-model-from-everywhere whose face became so synonymous with HealthCare.gov's hilarious launch that she had
to be replaced with a graphic plugging an 800 number.
Poor Julia. Yesterday I noted on Twitter that "The really funny part is
that #Julia was a web designer." Some people thought I was kidding. But I wasn't. Even better, the "Life of Julia" slideshow informed us that "For the past
four years, Julia has worked full-time as a web designer. [...] Now, in the real world, thanks to Obamacare, her hours have been pared back to 29 hours and she's been
dumped onto the exchanges where, as a young, healthy single woman, her premiums will go through the roof even as she earns less money. That is, if she can even get
onto a website created by and for people just like her.
Mamas, Don't Let Your Babies Grow Up To Be "Julia". Quick,
hide under the covers. The nation's storyteller, Barack Obama, unveiled a frightening new fable on the Internet intended to scare
women away from supporting fiscal conservatives in November. But as is increasingly common with Obama's social media propaganda
initiatives, "The Life of Julia" immediately flopped.
Who is "Julia," and why am I paying for her whole life? In
the new Barack Obama campaign piece The Life of Julia, voters can "Take a look at how President Obama's policies help one woman over
her lifetime — and how Mitt Romney would change her story." It is one of the most brazenly statist pieces of
campaign literature I can ever remember seeing.
O's campaign gets
creepy. The political world was transfixed yesterday by the Obama campaign's release of a Web slide show called
"The Life of Julia." It takes about two minutes to get through, and its purpose is to wow American women with all the
glorious government goodies they can and should claim throughout their lives — just so long as Mitt Romney doesn't
get elected and take them all away.
Obama
Promises Women A Lifetime Of Dependence. The Obama campaign website has a feature that's supposed to show how his
policies will help a fictional "Julia" during her life. What it really shows is Obama's vision of cradle-to-grave government
dependency.
Obama Campaign: Women Are Helpless.
Today, the Obama campaigned launched its Dads Are Unnecessary, Single Women Are Helpless campaign, simply titled "Julia." It
features a faceless composite, which seems to be the type of woman with which the campaign is most comfortable.
Monty Python's 'Life of Julia'.
"Julia" appears to have no males in her life — certainly not a husband when, at 31, she "decides to have a child" after
disporting herself sexually consequence-free in previous years, thanks to the wonders of Obamacare. On the macro level, is
this slideshow supposed to appeal to women? Real Americans, whose every natural fiber would be to rebel against its wan,
drab, Soviet-era view of existence, aren't going to buy it.
'Julia'. Alas, Team Obama has
omitted a few milestones from the life of Julia: 4 months: Julia's mother decides that giving birth will be hard on her
figure. She kills Julia. Under Barack Obama, her right to do so is absolutely nonnegotiable. 10 years:
Trapped in a failing and dangerous public school, Julia (another Julia, not the dead one) is terrified and miserable. Under the
Obama administration, protecting the government education monopoly from competition and accountability is almost as sacrosanct
as abortion.
The Life of Julia. I don't think I have ever
seen a cultural artifact that so desperately begs to be parodied and ridiculed, and is soill-suited to the audience it is intended to
reach, as the Obama campaign's "Life of Julia." If you haven't seen it yet, you really need to.
Obama woos 'Julia,'
other single women with promise of lifelong subsidies. The slide show follows an apparently unparented Julia who is enrolled
in Head Start, gets free contraceptives while she works as a 20-something web designer, has one child, retires around age 65 and
finally volunteers in a community garden. "That's their dream for women?" asked Wendy Wright, a social conservative leader and
acting director of the conservative Catholic Family & Human Rights Institute. "That she be alone, without family, struggling as a
single parent, dependent on a government that is going broke?" "This is not the American dream," Wright told The Daily Caller.
"It's creepy. ... It's what China promises its people."
The Life of Julia (Libertarian Remix).
The Obama-Biden campaign has just released the cartoon slideshow "The Life of Julia," which takes "a look at how President Obama's
policies help one woman over her lifetime — and how Mitt Romney would change her story." In our remix of that effort,
we take a look at how President Obama's policies is already helping to make one woman's life more miserable than it has to
be — and how Mitt Romney would pretty much do exactly the same.
Paul Ryan: Obama's 'Julia' website
'creepy' and 'demeaning'. "It suggests that this woman can't go anywhere in life without Barack Obama's government-centered society.
It's kind of demeaning to her," Ryan said during a constituent meeting in Wisconsin, the National Review reports. "She must have him and his big
government to depend on to go anywhere in life. It doesn't say much about his faith in Julia."
RNC Chair
Priebus: 'I don't want my daughter Grace to grow up like Julia'. The most recent example of rapid response regards
the Obama campaign's "Life of Julia," which ABC News describes as, "an infographic-style account of a cartoon heroine's journey
from preschool to retirement," Priebus promptly noted that her "share of the national debt went up $16,345 under Obama."
A day later, he was still talking Julia. "[W]e're either going to take the Julia, cradle to grave path, or we're going to
take the James Madison path," he said. "I don't want my daughter Grace to grow up like Julia," he added.
Parody: Julia's Circle of Life.
The continuing adventures of Barack Obama's favorite eyeless, mouthless government dependent.
Julia lives the socialistic life
thanks to Papa Obama. The phrase "cradle to grave welfare state" originated with Clement Atlee's socialist government in post-World War II
Britain. Back then, it was meant as a boastful description of a new age of government activism. Subsequently, it became a term of derision for
critics of an overweening government. In the spirit of Atlee, the Obama campaign revives the concept of "cradle to grave" as it highlights
Obama-supported programs that take care of Julia from age 3 to her retirement at age 67.
The Party of Julia. [Scroll down]
What's more, she seems to have no meaningful relationships apart from her bond with the Obama White House: no friends or siblings or extended
family, no husband ("Julia decides to have a child," is all the slide show says), a son who disappears once school starts and parents who only matter
because Obamacare grants her the privilege of staying on their health care plan until she's 26. This lends the whole production a curiously
patriarchal quality, with Obama as a beneficent Daddy Warbucks and Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan co-starring as the wicked uncles threatening to steal
Julia's inheritance.
Obama's
welfare-state Utopia: Never Never Land. In the Obama campaign's script, Julia enrolls in Head Start as a toddler, uses government
student loans, gets Obamacare subsidies throughout her working life, and lives off Social Security and Medicare in old age. Noticeably absent from
the presentation was any mention of the mounting debt that the nation's welfare-state obligations would impose on Julia, or the massive spending for which
she'd be on the hook if nothing is done to change course. It's worth taking a moment to fill in the blanks.
Women of the Welfare State. I just hope the Obamis are as stupid as we
conservatives imagine. Because it would be too bad if the "Life of Julia" turned out to be a cunning Chicago buffalo jump, stampeding conservatives into jumping
to red ruin in November.
Obama's Julia is a Woman in Need of Protector.
The slide show sends the message that Julia needs Obama to protect her from cradle to grave — which, in Julia's world, means from Head Start to Medicare.
When Julia does succeed, it's not because she worked hard and prevailed but because a paternalistic program was there to support her. She gets into college, for
example, because her high school is enrolled in Obama's Race to the Top education reform.
Romney
mocks Obama for using Julia 'cartoon' to sell economic record. Mitt Romney returned to Michigan Tuesday [5/8/2012] with a
retooled stump speech that included blistering new attacks on President Obama's economic record, calling the president's platform "a
throwback to the discredited policies of the past." [...] "Julia progresses from cradle to grave, showing how government makes every
good thing in her life possible. The weak economy, high unemployment, falling wages, rising gas prices, the national debt, the
insolvency of entitlements — all these are fictionally assumed away in a cartoon that is produced by a president who wants
us to forget about them," Romney said in an address in Lansing, Mich.
The year of losing touch with
reality. Somewhere in the recent past (say, about the time "Dreams From My Father" was published), liberals decided reality
wasn't really their thing. It was too dull. It didn't give closure. Sometimes the endings weren't right. So it turns
out that Obama's main squeeze in his young days was a "composite," digitally enhanced for your reading experience. [...] But the ultimate
blend of the counterfactual and the composite is surely "Julia," star of a Web presentation by the Obama campaign that traces a fictional
woman's life from ages 3 to 67 as she, led every step by a government program, enrolls in Head Start, goes to college, and bears
a son, Zachary (fathered perhaps by the federal government, as there is no sign of a father, much less of a husband).
Our Composite President. As funny as the 'Julia' parodies and imaginary girlfriend
jokes may have been, however, they skirted a larger issue: President Obama is a composite, too, and his carefully crafted political identity is coming
apart. The incumbent has been given more leeway and control over his life story than any other president in memory. Most of the details of his
early life come directly from his own pen. [...] The composite identity that took Obama 47 years to create has come undone in less than four years.
It was just as faked as Julia.
Obama's
'Julia' ad and the new Hubby State. "The Life of Julia," the Obama campaign's new interactive Web ad, follows a cartoon
everywoman, Julia, through the milestones of a middle-class American life: education, work, motherhood, retirement. One milestone
is pointedly missing: marriage. But, then again, why should Julia get married? She doesn't need to. Like a growing
number of single women with children, Julia is married to the state.
Julia's War on Feminism. When Gloria Steinem popularized the saying "a woman
needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle," I wasn't old enough to wear a bra, never mind burn it. However, thanks to that
feminist credo and its infiltration of 1970s popular culture, women of my generation grew up believing we could make it on our
own, like Mary Tyler Moore. While her theme song cautioned, "This world is awfully big, girl," our confidence rose with
Mary's cap, tossed triumphantly to "You're Gonna Make It After All." Indeed, we did make it, though presidential campaign
operatives peddling the "War on Women" narrative want you to believe otherwise. They insist there's a war on women when
there's actually a war for women's votes.
Obama's poor Julia. Thanks to
President Obama's advertising campaign, almost everybody must have heard about "Julia" by now. Her story invites a
comparison with "Jane," born in 1946, long before Mr. Obama.
Dinner at 8. Who on earth thought it was a great idea to urge
people to stop giving wedding presents to others, and give donations in their names to the campaign of Barack Obama instead? Possibly the same
people who thought "The Life of Julia" would be irresistible to America's voters.
Life of Henry. In May, the Obama campaign unveiled
its "Life of Julia," a website detailing "how President Obama's policies help one woman over her lifetime — and how Mitt Romney
would change her story." Julia is a composite character, the invention of one of the several hundred minions toiling away at Obama
headquarters in Chicago. She is intended to illustrate, in a literal and rather vulgar way, the benefits of the entitlement state,
from Head Start to student loans to Obamacare.
What Obama Thinks of Americans.
Was the animated version of Obama's story about his agenda "The Life of Julia" dumbed down enough for hapless Americans?
The Julia fiasco was mocked not just for its approach (the moral of the story is that all one has to look forward to is a life
of dependency), but also for apparently leaving some important facts on the cutting room floor, resulting in a collection of
"bogus" assumptions. Is this the type of story we are told to absorb?
The
Democrats think Romney just self-destructed . I can see why Democrats are so offended. How dare Mitt Romney say
they're dependent on the government? Only Democrats get to say they're dependent on the government! Has everybody
already forgotten "Julia"?
Obama's moocher culture. Mr. Obama views
government as a bottomless well of free handouts. Every idea, every proposal, every promise Mr. Obama makes involves the government giving
something to somebody. His urgent focus is to expand and strengthen government's role in everyone's daily life. This was illustrated
in the Obama campaign slideshow "The Life of Julia," a detailed roadmap for cradle-to-grave dependence on government. Every slide began
with, "Under President Obama" — which the White House believes is the proper place for Americans.
Women comprise biggest opposition to
ObamaCare. Remember Julia? That cute little cartoon the Obama folks created to illustrate how the president's policies
would provide "health and economic security" for women at all of life's stages? The real-life Julias aren't buying. A
CNN/ORC International poll out this week finds 60 percent of women opposing ObamaCare.
Women Don't Need Abortion
to Fulfill Their Dreams. In 2012, the Obama campaign made its philosophical underpinnings clear when it released the notorious "Life of
Julia" propaganda video. This portrait of a woman's life course seemingly had no other purpose than to underscore the impossibility of female
success without massive federal programs that cater to her every wish. School, work, childrearing, aging — all of these stages in a
woman's life are doomed to failure if Uncle Sam isn't there to guide her steps. Last Wednesday, President Obama insulted American women more
directly.
The
Disappearing American? Our popular culture reflects this multifarious growing reluctance to raise
children. And currently only 65% of children grow up in families with both parents. The 2012 Obamacare ad, "The
Life of Julia," fixated on the new ideal American woman: a single parent of one child, unmarried, and utterly reliant on
nearly 65 years of government support. The 2013 follow-up bookend ad fetishized "Pajama Boy." He was supposed to be
a typical prolonged-adolescent, man-child — sitting at home in his child-like footie pajamas, sipping hot
chocolate. "Pajama Boy" was likely the sort that "Julia" had no intention of marrying. There are historical
downsides — economic, cultural, social, and military — to nations that shun child-raising. They
shrink in size, age, no longer believe in transcendence, become mostly agnostic or atheistic, and obsess on the self.
And sometimes they eventually become dysfunctional — and slowly disappear.
Pajama Boy
The Pajama
Boy White House. During the showdown over Obamacare, the pro-Obama PAC Organizing for Action put out an ad now
known as "Pajama Boy." It showcased a young fellow in thick retro-rimmed glasses, wearing black-and-red plaid
children's-style pajamas, and sipping from a mug, with a sort of all-knowing expression on his face. The text
urged: "Wear pajamas. Drink hot chocolate. Talk about getting health insurance. #GetTalking."
Most men in Dayton or Huntsville do not lounge around in the morning in their pajamas, with or without built-in footpads, drinking
hot chocolate and scanning health-insurance policies. That our elites either think they do, or think the few that matter do,
explains why a nation $20 trillion in debt envisions the battle over transgender restrooms as if it were Pearl Harbor.
Pajama Boy Nation. Somehow we as a nation went from the
iconic Marlboro Man to Pajama Boy — from the noble individual with a bad habit to the ignoble without a good habit —
without a blink in between. There are lots of revolting things in the Pajama Boy ad. After all, how can you top all at once a
nerdy-looking child-man dressed in infantile pajamas while cradling a cup of hot chocolate with the smug assurance that he is running your
life more than you his?
Obamacare's 'Pajama Boy' was accused of racism,
anti-Semitism. Ethan Krupp, the little man who played "Pajama Boy" in a widely-mocked Obamacare ad, was accused in college of racism and
anti-Semitism. Krupp, an Organizing for Action (OFA) content writer who became the face of progressive America when he sipped cocoa and smirked while
wearing a onesie pajama suit in a recent Obamacare ad, is also a failed comedy writer whose work was not appreciated in his own time.
Obamacare 'pajamas boy' gets roundly
mocked. The White House is trying to get families to spread the word about Obamacare coverage options ahead of the holidays. Relatives will
gather around a common table, and key deadlines loom for enrollees who want to select a plan and be covered by the new year. The Obama administration
wants young people — like the man in pajamas, say — to sign up for coverage in state-based exchanges so that healthier people balance
out risk pools when sicker consumers with preexisting conditions enter the market, because they cannot be denied.
Pajama
Boy, An Insufferable Man-Child. Pajama Boy's place in Internet infamy was secured as soon as the insufferable man-child was tweeted out by
Organizing for America. He is the face of a web ad that is the latest effort by the Obama team to leverage the holidays for conversation about Obamacare.
"Wear pajamas," the ad reads. "Drink hot chocolate. Talk about getting health insurance. #GetTalking."
Pajama Boy: The Obama Machine's Id.
The Obama administration isn't doing very well with putting an empathetic face on its calamitous health-insurance law, is it? First, we had Julia, the
creepy, eyeless, vision-of-horror from Brave New World whose life was run from cradle to grave by the federal government. Then, we had Adriana, the
painfully neutral and carefully ambi-racial stock-model-from-everywhere whose face became so synonymous with HealthCare.gov's hilarious launch that she had
to be replaced with a graphic plugging an 800 number. And now, courtesy of Organizing for Action, we have Pajama Boy, a metrosexual hipster in a
plaid onesie who wants you to spend your precious Christmas days talking to him about the president's vision for health insurance.
Pajama Boy: The Obama Machine's Id.
OFA, and its various offshoots, are staffed by third-growth McGovernites who have come of age at the exact point that the radicalism of the 1960s finally won
out. As David Burge of "Iowahawk" fame likes to joke, perhaps it wasn't "a good idea to turn the most successful country in the history of the world over
to the grievance faculty at Harvard." Still, that is what we have done. And we have ended up with a parade of over-educated and under-experienced
perpetual children who don't think twice before dressing a grown man up in footie pajamas.
ObamaCare Chaos Continues. We begin with the
unintended comedy known as Pajama Boy. The Obama administration's former campaign apparatus, Organizing for America (OFA), apparently believes
the way to get the so-called "young invincibles," necessary to subsidize older and sicker Americans to sign up for healthcare, is to appeal to
their inner metrosexual. [...] When the only commandment for implementing the progressive agenda is "by any means necessary," there are no such
things as stereotypes, cliches, unseemly titillation — or the rule of law.
Pajama
Boy: Obama's Smirking Commissar. The effete visage of the ObamaCare pitchman known as Pajama Boy already is a figure of fun.
But now it comes to light that Ethan Krupp is more than just a smirking, turnoff face for an ad. He's a leftist extremist.
Left is getting desperate over Pajama
Boy. The palpable embarrassment of the Left over Obamacare has led to an odd and disturbing reaction. Following the creation
of the now-infamous Pajama Boy tweet from Barackobama.com (aka Obama for America, aka Organizing for Action), embodying so much that is wrong with
Obamacare and socialism in general — the infantilization of adults, the smirking know-it-all attitude of the nanny state, and the
inappropriate intrusions in our private lives — conservatives erupted with a wave of hilarious mockery. The resulting sting
obviously has psychologically wounded the Left.
Reema
Meet
Reema! White House puts out childish propaganda video on Syrian refugee screening. Remember Julia? Reema is the Syrian
Muslim Julia! This will make you want to scream! There is nothing to "crosscheck" her "biographic and biometric" data with —
there is no data available from Syria! Interesting that it confirms that it is the UN High Commissioner for Refugees sending the Syrians to your
towns! And, that they have 23,000 in a pipeline to America at this very minute.