The American people seem especially susceptible to "bandwagon" propaganda: They tend to support any idea that the majority favors,
because they are reluctant to swim against the current and question the orthodoxy. The orthodoxy is whatever the television declares
more than once. As a result, fresh polling information can be formed into a series of self-fulfilling pronouncements.
By and large, the news media in America, and I suppose all over the world, are demonstrably
biased toward the political left. One form of bias is the
uncritical presentation of polls. There are trustworthy polling organizations which are very careful to gather
and present their findings in a statistically sound manner that leaves little doubt about the polls' accuracy. Gallup and Rasmussen come to mind
immediately, although there must be others. Unfortunately,
the news media seem to present polling results from almost anybody, and in some cases the polls are thinly-disguised propaganda.
That wouldn't be a problem, except that millions of poorly-educated Americans tend to watch television without questioning
anything the television says. If the television talking head says something, it must be true -- at least until tomorrow
when the "facts" may be controverted. This is due in part to the use of television in classrooms, where every idea the
TV screen emits is to be taken as factual instruction.
One TV station with which I am familiar has now replaced the term "Margin of Error" with "Credibility."
But credibility and accuracy are two different things. I don't know if this is a nationwide trend or if it is
confined to one station; but frankly, that station is not known for original ideas.
ahead for Democrats? Joe Biden's average approval rating is 54 percent. That's not bad, though it lags
behind the 100-day numbers of every post-World War II president except Donald Trump. But our friend Michael Barone
looks behind that number and sees worrying signs for Democrats. For one thing, Biden's 41.6 percent disapproval number
is about equal to Trump's. And Biden's real numbers may be worse than what the poll average shows because, as The Cook
Political Report's Amy Walter suggests, polls seem to be under-sampling Republican voters.
News Still Gaslighting America with Phony Polls. Opinion polls are a well-known and effective method of shaping
opinion. These methods have been well described and include sampling whoever answers the phone versus likely voters,
the latter being a practice of Rasmussen Reports in their high accurate presidential opinion polls. Oversampling
Democrats is another fraudulent way to produce a poll result favoring the DNC media agenda. [...] Perhaps the woke leftists
in Hollywood and the White House are not as popular as CNN believes they are. Back to the poll, commissioned by CNN,
conducted by SSRS Opinion Panel: The sample was 589 respondents, only slightly more than the size of the U.S.
Congress. Of those surveyed, 45 percent identified as Democrat compared to 23 percent as Republican, a two-fold
difference. Is it any wonder that seven out of 10 gave the speech a thumbs up? They should have saved money and
just surveyed the CNN newsroom, getting the same or an even more favorable result.
Snopes Calls Out Bogus CBS Poll Showing 85 Percent Approval Of Biden Speech. The media has already firmly
established that there is no degree to which it won't go when it comes to protecting Joe Biden. However, the latest
fake poll by CBS was too much for some, including the intrepid "fact checker' Snopes. Biden was trotted out to give a
scaled-down State Of The Union speech to a sparsely attended "joint session" of Congress on Wednesday. CBS conducted a
survey that night that was thoroughly dishonest even by their own abysmal standards.
it comes to GOP failings, Tucker Carlson names a name. Tucker Carlson opened Friday night's show with rather
unique information. The rhetorical question was why the Republican leadership is so disconnected from Republican
voters. One of the reasons, he said, is Frank Luntz. For decades, Luntz has been giving the GOP leadership its
talking points. The problem is that Luntz is not a conservative; he is a corporate servant and his points always align
with corporate America — and lately, corporate America has been aligning with the woke left. [...] Frank Luntz is
a man who has no loyalty, yet the Republican party leadership is incredibly loyal to him. He's the one who tells them
that Republican voters love illegal immigration, want amnesty, and think it's a great idea for the government to take their weapons.
a way to present Joe Biden's tax-and-spend speech as a hit with the public. Joe Biden's quasi
state-of-the-union speech the other night was a miserable affair. With a void of new ideas, Biden shilled a leftist
tax-and-spend scheme writ large, with an ugly side of wokesterism. One problem: The voting public despises this
[stuff]. So out trots the media to put the spin on it, bolstering the old foof, and hammer, hammer, hammering home the
lie that Biden's speech was somehow popular. [...] The problem of course, is that the CBS/YouGov poll sampled an audience
that was hugely skewed Democrat. Fifty-four percent of the audience was Democrat, while only 34% of American voters
identify as Democrats, as CBS noted lower, way lower, down in the story. A president's political base is always going
to have a positive response to their leader. If they don't, then it becomes actual news. Biden's leftist base
loves him is the story here, although they didn't put it that way. What exactly was news about this?
[Doubt] CBS Poll Claiming 85% Approve of Biden Speech. Democrats are all rabidly promoting a CBS poll about the
reaction to Joe Biden's speech before Congress tonight. The poll claimed that 85% of the viewers they surveyed approved
of Biden's speech. [...] Now, we can say a lot about polls, but 85% is North Korea level propaganda. It's so high you
know that there's a problem. This is basically CBS trying to shill for the Democrats. They tried to sell that
Americans saw Biden as "unifying" and "inspirational." This is Joe Biden, guys, you can't sell that here. Listen as CBS
tells us they spoke to a "representative" sample of Americans to reach those numbers. Except then as they explain more,
the problem comes out. As they continue, that sample was anything but "representative." [Video clip]
spin, Joe Biden's polling indicators are crumbling. The press is hailing Joe Biden's approval numbers as he
reaches the first 100 days in office. [...] The short answer to all this gushing is that the press is biased and spinning for
Biden. The innards of these polls actually show a lot of trouble. For one thing, independent support for Biden is
falling. RedState points out that the big weak spot for Biden among independents is his atrocious handling of the
border. The Fox News poll's question about whether security is better or worse or the same at the border showed that
46% of voters felt that border security in 2021 is worse than two years ago, a sharp spike from the 17% who said that in
2018. Independents accounted for much of that fall. For another, these pollsters oversampled Democrats. Most
showed large margins of registered Democrats sampled that didn't coincide with the percentages of voters who voted from both
parties in 2020. That breakdown should have been 36% registered Republicans and 37% registered Democrats. It
wasn't. The pollsters polled as if Democrats amounted to as much as 50% of the majority.
change, racism and social justice concerns affecting Gen Z's physical and mental health. As Earth Day is
celebrated, Generation Z is grappling with the health of the planet and racism and social justice, according to a new
survey. More than eight out of 10 young Americans say they are concerned about the health of the planet, according to
the Blue Shield of California NextGen Climate Survey which polled participants between the ages of 14 [and] 24. When
asked about which issue concerned them the most, the environment and climate change had the second-highest percentage at 47%,
behind racism and social justice at 62%.
The Editor says...
Nobody needs to "grappl[e] with the health of the planet." The planet is not unhealthy, and there is no global warming,
climate crisis, or climate emergency, regardless of what these young people have been told in the public schools. These young
people have heard only one side of any important issue; therefore their opinions are worthless — just like
Earth Day. Nobody under 18 can legally vote, so what difference does their opinion make anyway?
Approval Ratings' Really? Nonsense, Here's Why Americans Have Had Enough of Biden. There is a "yuuge"
disconnect between Joe Biden's alleged poll numbers and "solid approval ratings" the liberal lapdog media continues to try to
push down the throat of America, and the widespread dissatisfaction with his near-daily decisions and the radical agenda he
is hellbent on enacting. And that disconnect has existed from day one. [...] Addled Joe Biden — who first
ran for president in 1988, 33 years ago in a campaign that crashed and burned before it got off the ground, in large part due
to his plagiarization of an entire speech by UK Labour Party Leader Neil Kinnock — finally made it to the Oval
Office. But the reality is when he finally made it, Corn Pop's pal was instantly reduced to little more than a
not-Trump placeholder for the Democrat Party. To the rest of us, Biden is little more than a mindless bot whose strings
are pulled by radical leftists who purposely seek to destroy America as we know it.
New Poll Shows the Pollsters Aren't Even Trying Anymore. You've probably noticed a barrage of approval rating
polls being released in the past month or so, and nearly all of them show Joe Biden as a president for the ages. We've
seen such high numbers as 60% approval in some surveys. Perhaps Biden is just that much of a unifier, despite pushing
the most radical, divisive agenda in modern history? Or perhaps there's something else going on with these polls.
Yeah, it's the latter. Random thought, but if your sample is coming out to a raw D+31 sample, perhaps there's something
wrong with your pool that you are originally drawing from? Are they just calling people in blue states? Further,
if you look at the internals, they only weight the poll to D+9, while the 2020 election was Biden +4. The margin was
even smaller in the vote totals for the House, for example. In other words, the country much more evenly divided than
shown here, but according to these pollsters, we are in a new era of peace and unity. The purpose of this is clear:
to push a narrative of inevitability going into 2022 for Democrats.
institutions are cheating to prop up the Biden administration. In three months, Joe Biden has exffectively
erased all American norms. Worse, he's done so by executive fiat rather than the legislative process. It's likely
that only Democrats (and not even all Democrats) support him. Nevertheless, a Pew poll, which the media is shilling,
assures us that he's got a 59% approval rating. Dig into the poll, though, and it's a lie [...]. In other words, we
are being sold a narrative that has nothing to do with the truth. First, about that poll. [...] It turns out that, as
to some of those things, we know that most Americans oppose Biden's policies. On Court-packing, an October poll
that the New York Times conducted showed that 58% of likely voters oppose it. Americans feel even more strongly
about voter ID: 75% of them support it. Americans also disapprove of Biden's border policy, with 55% of them saying
he's doing a bad job and only 29% saying he's doing a good job.
Dem pollsters acknowledge
'major errors' in 2020 polling. A group of top Democratic Party pollsters are set to release a public statement
Tuesday [4/13/2021] acknowledging "major errors" in their 2020 polling — errors that left party officials stunned
by election results that failed to come close to expectations in November. In an unusual move, five of the party's
biggest polling firms have spent the past few months working together to explore what went wrong last year and how it can be
fixed. It's part of an effort to understand why — despite data showing Joe Biden well ahead of former
President Donald Trump, and Democrats poised to increase their House majority — the party won the presidency, the
Senate and House by extremely narrow margins.
The Editor says...
Propaganda alert: To believe this story, you have to first believe that the election was not stolen, and that the
candidate who stayed home and didn't campaign at all got 80 million legitimate votes.
pollsters admit 'major errors' as they struggle to survive evidence that polls now are worthless. Political
polling has always been of questionable value in my eyes, yet until recently it's been highly prized (and pollsters well
compensated). When performed for media outlets, polling often is done to advance an agenda (so-called "push polling"),
phrasing questions in a manner designed to produce results that would convince the public that a certain issue or candidate
is what the cool kids favor. But even when done for a candidate seeking to discover where he or she stands in the
public eye, the potential for abuse is high. Candidates re-packaging themselves to appeal to a broader group rather
than deciding issues on the merits, resorting to misleading language to hide their real positions, and outright pandering are
just some of the problems. But now that the media and pollsters have earned well-deserved scorn from a very large share
of the public, so many people either refuse to speak with pollsters or outright lie to them in order to confound their
ability to be useful, I think they have outlived their effectiveness for anybody.
House Claims Bills Are 'Bipartisan' Even If No Republican Votes For Them. Joe Biden is going to get "unity."
He will get it even if he has to just make stuff up. Case in point: bills proposed by a Democratic president,
rammed through Congress by Democratic lawmakers, and voted on exclusively by Democrats are actually "bipartisan" according to
the White House. Biden campaigned and took office as the "unity" president. A noble aspiration, to be sure.
The only problem is that no Republicans have actually voted for any of his grandiose schemes. The trillions of dollars
of debt he is adding to the balance sheet is Democratic Party debt. But the White House believes that Biden's giveaways
are popular and that many Republicans love getting government goodies just as much as Democrats. How does the White
House know this? Polls, of course.
Owes His 'Popularity' to Trump's Success With COVID. Here's Why. Joe Biden can't always speak in full, coherent
sentences. He has trouble with stairs. Half the time, I'm not sure if he knows what office he holds, yet, he has
a 53.4% average approval rating, according to RealClearPolitics. [...] Biden has a whopping 75% approval for COVID vaccine
distribution. It just so happens that's the very thing the Biden administration has been lying about repeatedly by
claiming the Trump administration hadn't given them a vaccine distribution plan and saying they had to start from
scratch. Not only did Dr. Fauci dismiss that claim, but, according to Dr. Moncef Slaoui, the former head of
Operation Warp Speed, the Biden administration is still using the same vaccine distribution model developed by Operation Warp
Speed under President Trump. Joe Biden's Department of Defense also doesn't dispute that the distribution plan is the
same as it was under Trump.
approval rating remains bizarrely high. If you ever need proof that Americans are living in two different
realities, you can find it in the latest Hill/Harris X poll showing that Biden has a 59% job approval rating two months into
his presidency. For more than half of Americans, the mainstream media, even though people claim to distrust it, is
still powerfully driving public perceptions about American presidents. According to the poll, which queried 2,818
registered voters and claims a margin of error of only 1.85 percentage points, ["]Roughly six in 10 voters approve of
Joe Biden's performance as president, a new Hill-HarrisX poll finds. Fifty-nine percent of registered voters in the
March 12-14 survey said they approve of Biden's job in the White House, a one point tick up from last week's poll.["]
49: Half the nation worried Biden not 'physically and mentally up to the job'. It doesn't take much for the
nation's voters to become concerned that President Biden, the oldest new chief executive at 78 years old, might not be up for
the job. The latest proof: His resistance to holding a full-blown press conference now 49 days into his
presidency has half the country worried. In the latest Rasmussen Reports survey of likely voters, 50% said they are not
confident that "Joe Biden is physically and mentally up to the job of being president of the United States." Another
48% have confidence in Biden, though only 34% were "very confident" that he was up to the job.
Believes One Of The Past Two Presidents [was] "Illegitimately Put Into Office". On the plus side, it looks like
all of the hard work members of both parties have put into undermining confidence in America's vote has really paid off.
Between "stop the steal" and Russia-collusion claims, a majority of Americans think we've gotten the outcome of the presidential
election wrong at least once over the past four-plus years, Scott Rasmussen writes about his latest findings.
the People Think? I'm looking over the 189-page results of a recent Harvard-Harris poll of 1,778 voters
conducted last week, and there are some interesting findings to pass along: [...]
Poll: Here's How The 2024 GOP Field Looks Without Trump In The Mix. While it is unknown whether former
President Donald J. Trump will mount another White House run, he would likely be the runaway favorite if he does.
However, any GOP candidate will likely have massive support given the Biden-Harris's regime's growing unpopularity.
According to polling data put together by analytics firm Echelon Insights, Trump would indeed be the top choice among
Republicans if he chooses to launch a comeback bid with 41 percent of Republican-leaning voters backing him if the primary
were held today[.] If Trump doesn't run, then the polling shows that former Vice President Mike Pence is currently in the
lead with 21 percent, doubling that of Senator Ted Cruz who clocks in at 10 percent although criticism over his trip to
Cancun during the Texas power crisis could cut into that. Coming in third, it's a tie between Donald Trump Jr. and Florida
Governor Ron DeSantis.
The Editor says...
The phrase if the election were held today is ridiculous and trite, because everybody knows when the next election
will be, and it isn't today. But if a surprise election were to be held today, without any prior notice, you can be sure
that hundreds of mail-in ballots would arrive next week and they'd be counted!
impeachment, contempt for due process. With the Senate "trial" on the House impeachment of former President
Trump just underway, CBS News has come in with a poll asserting that 56 percent of Americans favor conviction, with
44 percent opposed.
to Steal an Election in Four Steps. [Scroll down] Step two of the plan was nurturing the idea that Biden
had an excellent chance to win, accomplished mostly via fake polls. (The pollsters are more shameless than the media, no mean
feat.) Biden was far behind, so they claimed he was leading — to inspire Biden supporters — but they
had another reason to overstate his chances. If the polls had been honest, if they'd showed Biden had little chance, and
then he won, even Democrats might suspect something. To lend credence to their later claim that Biden had won the election
fairly they had to establish that he could win, so that when he was declared the winner, only the Republicans would suspect fraud,
to be blamed on sour grapes. Consequently, the polls had Biden up by ten to twenty points even in states Trump had won
against Hillary Clinton in 2016, like Michigan and Wisconsin, laughable claims to anyone who'd seen videos of the crowds each
man was drawing.
Jon Ossoff, Raphael Warnock Leading GOP Incumbents in Battleground Georgia. Democrat Senate candidates Raphael
Warnock and Jon Ossoff are leading GOP incumbent Sens. Kelly Loeffler (R-GA) and David Perdue (R-GA) in battleground
Georgia less than a week from the January 5 runoff elections, according to a JMC Analytics and Polling survey released this
week. The survey, taken December 28-29, among 500 registered voters in the state, asked respondents, "In the Senate
runoff race between Jon Ossoff and David Perdue, which candidate do you support?" Fifty percent chose Ossoff, 43 percent
chose Perdue, and seven percent indicated that they remain undecided. According to the survey, Ossoff also has an edge
among undecided voters, 53 percent to the incumbent senator's 45 percent.
Poll: Raphael Warnock, Jon Ossoff Lead GOP Incumbents. Both Democrat Senate hopefuls Rev. Raphael
Warnock and Jon Ossoff are leading the Republican incumbents in Georgia's upcoming runoff, a SurveyUSA election poll released
this week found. This week's survey showed Ossoff increasing his lead over Sen. David Perdue from an identical
survey taken three weeks ago, jumping from a two-point lead to a five-point lead, or 51 percent to 46 percent.
Dead Heat in Georgia Senate Runoff. Georgia Republican Sens. Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue are trailing
their respective Democrat challengers Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff but remain statistically tied just weeks ahead of the
January 5 runoff, an RMG Research survey released Monday [12/21/2020] revealed. The survey, taken December 8-14
among 1,417 likely voters in Georgia, showed both Warnock and Ossoff edging out the Republican incumbents, though both of their
leads are within the survey's +/- 2.6 percent margin of error.
New Oligarchs Will Not Tolerate Secession. Pollsters did not use the wrong methodology in conducting polls;
almost certainly they misreported results on purpose to suppress turnout. The media was uniformly against him,
suppressing news — which the FBI said was credible but not worth investigating — about Hunter Biden's
corrupt dealings, trading on his father's connections with Russia, China, and Ukraine. The role of the Dominion Voting
system, an easily manipulated system that can change results in real time without a trace, may be revealed in the
future. But it is clear that the election was in fact stolen from Trump by the oligarchy he dared oppose. The
likelihood that there will ever be another free election in America is remote.
Says Joe Biden Didn't Win Presidential Election: "The Numbers Just Don't Add Up". Pollster Patrick Basham
explained during an interview with Fox News's Mark Levin why he believes Joe Biden's supposed election victory, while "not
statistically impossible," is "statistically implausible." Basham said during the interview that aired Sunday
[12/6/2020] that he looked at numerous "non-polling metrics," which have a "100 percent accuracy rate in terms of predicting
the winner of the presidential election," to come to his conclusion. "Something very strange has happened because the
numbers just don't add up," he said referring to the election results. Some of the "dozen or more" metrics include
"party registration trends, how the candidates did in their respective presidential primaries, the number of individual
donations, [and] how much enthusiasm each candidate generated in the opinion polls." He said these metrics pointed to a
Trump victory in 2016 and "that was again the case in 2020." "So if we are to accept that Biden won against the trend of
all these non-polling metrics, it not only means that one of these metrics was inaccurate ... for the first time ever, it
means that each one of these metrics was wrong for the first time and at the same time as all of the others," Basham
explained. The founding director of the Democracy Institute said if 100 observers were only shown the "vote breakdown
by demographic group" on election night, 99 "would say, well, obviously, Trump."
Polls Are Trash, Stop Citing Them for the Georgia Run-Offs. Have we actually learned anything after another
epic polling failure in the 2020 election? Perhaps, though there's still a tendency to take the polls seriously simply
because they represent a data point, and people crave data in political situations. [...] I've often cited polls in the
past. But 2020 broke me for good in that respect. I simply do not care what these mostly garbage polling outfits
throw out there. That's even more true given they seem to never learn from their mistakes.
Polling Undermines Democracy. Pollsters recently suffered another well-deserved humiliation. Republican
candidates for Senate and House did much better than polls predicted and some states predicted to support Joe Biden
didn't. But if we only criticize polls for their inaccuracy we are missing far more fundamental problems with
them. Inaccurate polling is nothing new. We all remember 2016. But problems go back much further. The
infamous 1936 Literary Digest poll predicted a landslide victory for Republican candidate Alf Landon. The actual
landslide was for Democrat Franklin D. Roosevelt, who won all but two states. [...] Pollsters always vow to become more
accurate. But the basic problem is not with polling inaccuracy but with polling itself. Increased accuracy could
make polls even more troublesome. What does polling contribute to our public discourse and democratic decision-making?
What benefit is there to knowing an election's outcome before people have even voted? What's the hurry?
Polls, Everywhere Polls, Mostly Wrong As It Turns Out. Businesses, non-profits and political groups routinely
seek information from target audiences. To this end they can use polling, surveys and focus groups to gather
data. Results can be used objectively or used to promote an agenda. Intentionally flawed methods will generate
meaningless data that in turn can be used to lend an air of legitimacy to virtually any position. In this piece I'll
outline how to manufacture both types. If you are not already, you will likely be skeptical of polls by the end of the
article. Corporations have every incentive to collect accurate data, especially in the area of product
development. Poor research can lead to weak product demand and financial loss. When developing a consumer survey
it is therefore essential to pose unbiased questions and to associate a cost with each feature or action described.
This is true for opinion gathering in both the public and private sectors, more of which later.
The Gateway Political Drug to Misinformation, Mistakes and Malfeasance. I don't need to go through a long list
of reasons why nobody should take pollsters seriously anymore, but a few data points are instructive. FiveThirtyEight
aggregated a number of polls that misinformed Americans into believing that Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) was about to be
tossed out of the Senate by the voters. The polls just before Election Day had Sara Gideon winning. Change
Research had Gideon up by 8%, Emerson College had her up by 2%, and FiveThirtyEight forecasted that Gideon had a 59% chance
of winning that Maine Senate seat. That would not be a big problem if the pollsters had not botched so many other
races. They didn't merely miss the Maine Senate race, they seemed to miss all the elections nationwide.
Sen. Thom Tillis, who won, was given a 32% chance of victory by FiveThirtyEight just before Election Day.
Lots of Takeaways From
November 2020. [Scroll down] Senate seats that were said to be in jeopardy — Susan Collins in
Maine, Steve Daines in Montana, Joni Ernst in Iowa, Thom Tillis in North Carolina, John Cornyn in Texas, Lindsey Graham in
South Carolina, Mitch McConnell in Kentucky — all were huge and easy wins, typically by spreads of approximately
10 points or more. The false polls wreaked havoc by giving Democrat millionaires and billionaires false hopes of
winning unwinnable seats, thus inducing them to pump tens of millions and hundreds of millions they would not have donated if
they knew the real numbers underlying voter sentiment. So the phony polls made the non-competitive races "competitive"
by motivating money to be pumped in. Even so, the GOP blew them off down ticket, even with major wins in state houses.
Establishment Media's Real Concern:
How Did Trump Manage to Do So Well? The establishment media's preferred answer to how the polls failed to
detect millions of Trump voters is that the error was stupid, not sinister. "Whoops, we just missed them" —
despite this being pollsters' business, their assurance that they had "fixed" their polls' problems from 2016, and the
mistake being of incredible size. As results show, 2020's error is greater than 2016's. The establishment media
has readily blamed the pollsters, essentially exonerating itself by saying that it was just reporting what it was told.
Yet neglected is the fact that the polls' results were confirming the establishment media's own bias. This bias has
been repeatedly cited for decades and has never been clearer than over the last four years.
Republicans crashed Nancy Pelosi's party. Not long before Election Day, the Associated Press ran a story
headlined "House already won? Pelosi thinks so, and reaches for more." The article said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was
so confident about keeping control of the House that she was preparing for an expanded Democratic majority. "Pelosi
notes experts have suggested Democrats will pick up between five and 15 House seats," the outlet reported.
Pollsters and Prognosticators 'Experts' Anymore When They Get So Much Wrong? So much for experts, at least
until the next election in a couple of years. We can all be assured they'll be back with their polls, which all
oversample Democrats as they do year after year, and all ignore the effect that the credible threat of politically-motivated
violence by leftists against everyone else has on polling and on local races. They won't poll the effects of rising
crime, of the threat of overseas war Biden (if he prevails) is sure to bring back to the fore, economic uncertainty thanks to
leftist anti-energy and other policies, or anything else that real people really care about. The "experts" have little
time for your petty concerns, peasant. All of this also ought to make one wonder, in an election in which Republicans
did so well and defied the "experts" at every level, what really happened at the top of the ticket?
and Least Accurate Polls From Presidential Election. The Investor's Business Daily/TIPP poll defended its title
as the most accurate pollster for predicting presidential outcomes. The pollsters take the No. 1 spot for the fifth
presidential cycle in a row, a Newsmax review reveals. Among the worst polls were those from CNN and Quinnipiac.
One of only two polls to predict President Donald Trump's 2016 win, the IBD/TIPP poll came closest to predicting the outcome
of the 2020 presidential election. The Hill-HarrisX poll also predicted election results with the same accuracy,
according to American Research Group, Inc.
Listed 27 House Races As Toss-Ups. Republicans Won All 27. On Monday [11/16/2020], Burgess Owens, a
former NFL player and vocal critic of Colin Kaepernick, was declared the winner of Utah's 4th Congressional District.
Despite running against an incumbent and trailing by 11% in final polling, Owens prevailed in a race deemed a "toss-up" by
Cook Political Report, a "nonpartisan" election and campaign analysis group popular among legacy media outlets. Ahead
of the 2020 election, Cook listed 27 races as "toss-ups," meaning they were too close to predict one way or the other.
Republicans won all 27. That's not a typo. Despite being assured by that conservatism was about to drown beneath
an impending "blue wave," Republicans won every single close race. Republicans also won all 26 races deemed "leaning or
likely Republican," and even picked up 7 of the 36 seats listed as "leaning or likely Democrat."
polls have skewed results since 2014. The news media's Democrat-favoring election polls did not begin with the
Donald Trump era, an examination by The Washington Times shows. The 2014 and 2018 off-year elections were also
mistake-filled, as surveyors undercounted the Republican vote in key contested races. Republicans say it matters
because anti-GOP polls can suppress votes, hurt fundraising and lead to news media reporting that the Republican candidate
has little chance.
said it's not important who votes but how they are counted. How did pollsters miss five million new Trump
voters? They refused to accept the Shy Trump voter was real in 2016. So, they didn't look for them in 2020. We knew
they were real, and we found far more of them this year. This time, Shy Trump voters were disproportionately Black
males in urban areas and suburban White women. This data confirmed the significant movement of Black voters towards
Trump — and the movement of a segment of suburban White women back to Trump. As a result, we predicted his
higher Black vote to the actual percentage point. We also identified, due to Trump's pro-law and order stance, that
he'd suffer only minor, rather than seismic, losses among suburban women.
the Polls Say About David Perdue vs Jon Ossoff in Georgia Senate Runoff. Republican Senator David Perdue and
Democratic rival Jon Ossoff are locked in a tight head-to-head race with less than two months until the Georgia runoff
election, according to a new poll from a national Republican-leaning pollster. Remington Research Group's poll found
incumbent Perdue at 50 percent among likely voters surveyed to Ossoff's 46 percent, with a 2.6-point margin of error and
3 percent still undecided — nearly matching the results in their tight race just last week. The survey of
1,450 likely voters from November 8-9 was first reported by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
Red Wave No One Saw Coming. Had you spent any time in this northern suburb of Pittsburgh listening to voters,
finding out what matters to them when it comes to schools, community growth, economic prosperity and the emotional impact of
the COVID-19 lockdowns, you would have at least been skeptical of the media narrative and the polls that claimed suburban
voters here are no longer center-right. Not Republican per se, just center-right. Most reporters certainly didn't
take the time to do so. Instead, they relied on the scolding of our cultural curators in sports, media and Hollywood as
an indicator of how these affluent, college-educated voters would vote. Surely, reporters thought, these suburbs had
fully embraced "wokeism" and rejected center-right values and principles. They thought they would cave under the
cultural pressure, push left and send a blue shock wave across the country with their votes.
urges pollsters to seek new profession after Trump outperforms polls: 'Sell real estate'. Republican pollster
Frank Luntz told Fox News' "Media Buzz" on Sunday that the credibility of his profession has been irreversibly damaged after
President Trump outperformed polls for a second straight presidential election. The Veteran pollster told host Howard
Krutz that that public opinion surveys significantly underestimated Trump's support again, and urged those responsible for
botching back-to-back presidential elections to seek a new profession. "I think what is happening is accountability in
action," Luntz argued, "and if you got it wrong this time, you got it wrong twice in a row, you shouldn't be working in the
business. There are other things you can do. You can sell real estate. You can sell stocks," he said.
"Stop selling polls."
The Fight is Now. The
results last night revealed conclusively that our supposed experts lied to the nation throughout 2020's election season with
deceptive polls, statistics, and percentages about Trump's chances. This is no surprise — we already know
our ruling class has lied non-stop to the American people about President Trump for four years. Now we are asked to
simply trust corrupt Democratic political machines in one-party cities to count the vote honestly. We will not.
Instead, Republicans must aggressively investigate and prosecute any and all wrongdoing in the attempt to steal this
election. The reason the Democratic Party just broke all the norms related to voting in America is because they are
trying to fend off a loss. They hastily changed the rules midstream by means of hundreds of lawsuits, using COVID as an
excuse, and a stream of stories of troubling irregularities is now flowing out of the remaining disputed states. The
question upon which everything now depends is whether or not Republicans are willing to stop them.
Trump's strong Hispanic support befuddles Democrats, activists.
Hispanic activists had promised that President Trump's immigration policy, insulting rhetoric and handling of the coronavirus
pandemic — with a disproportionate impact on Hispanics — would earn him the lowest share of their votes
in modern American history. They were wrong. The main news media consortium's exit polling showed Mr. Trump
expanding his share of the Hispanic vote from 28% in 2016 to 32% this year. A separate exit poll for The Associated
Press and Fox News showed Mr. Trump winning 35%, which would be the second-best performance for any Republican since
Ronald Reagan. That success has set off a round of soul-searching among those who insisted that Hispanics would punish
Polling Isn't The Problem, Intentionally False Media Polls Are The Problem. The media once again failed in
their election coverage by intentionally amplifying corrupt polls and preconceived narratives, while ignoring the few
pollsters who did accurately predict the electorate's support for President Donald Trump, noted Federalist Senior Editor
Mollie Hemingway on Wednesday [11/4/2020]. "These polls were off by such a great amount, but not all polls. There
were a few pollsters who actually got things right, which shows that it was possible to look at this race accurately,"
Hemingway said on Fox News' "The Ingraham Angle" Wednesday night. "But the media narrative — that this was
an impossible win for Donald Trump, that the Senate was going to the Democrats, that Democrats would gain more seats in the
House — every single part of that was wrong, and demonstrably wrong." RealClearPolitics Co-Founder Tom Bevan
joined Hemingway in noting that some polling groups like Trafalgar and Susquehanna did accurately predict a close race for
President Trump, but said corporate media only amplified their preferred polls predicting a Joe Biden win.
Other Winners and Losers. [For example,] The Pollsters: You know, in the world we normal people dwell in,
when you consistently fail, you get fired. But, as in so many of our garbage establishment institutions, when you're a
pollster there is no accountability. You keep failing and failing and failing and your dumb clients and the dumb media
keep citing your garbage surveys. It's really remarkable. You would think they would have a little pride in
themselves and not want to look like idiots, but no.
the Real Clear Politics Average. Real Clear Politics needs to dump its average of polls because the average is
based on untrustworthy polls. The average is most popular feature at the site, but staking its reputation on garbage
polls is, in hindsight, a quick way to lose credibility.
Democrats Suffer a Catastrophe that Will Blow Up Their Party. House Democrats went into Election Day supremely
confident that they were going to put another nail in the Republicans' coffin. They had outraised and outspent
Republican candidates across the board. They felt the issues of the pandemic response and Obamacare favored them. [...]
But the polls were wrong. They were very wrong.
the ways pollsters and the media were wrong, wrong, wrong. They blew it again. After muffing it
spectacularly in 2016, when Hillary Clinton was supposed to cruise to easy victory over Donald Trump, pollsters and the media
should be ashamed by how wrong they got this year's election. Even after their cross-their-hearts-and-hope-to-die
promises to fix flaws in their methodology — which always errs in their preferred, liberal direction. Like
Clinton, Joe Biden was supposed to be a sure winner — possibly in a landslide victory over President Trump.
Polling "guru" Nate Silver of FiveThirtyEight gave Biden a whopping 89 percent chance of winning. RealClearPolitics'
compilation of polls showed Biden with an average 7.2 percentage-point national lead; some polls had the spread in the double
digits at various times. In the top battleground states, Biden averaged a 2.3-point lead, according to RCP.
What Kind of Sore-Losing Idiot Would Suspect
the Democrats of Voter Fraud? The whole election system, from top to bottom, is rife with corruption and
stinks. For example, ABC-TV and the Washington Post published a poll near election day that Trump would lose
Wisconsin by 17 points. Seventeen points. Many such polls were aimed at achieving voter suppression.
There is a reason that even the corrupt leftist media agree not to announce actual voting results on Election Day until a
respective state's polls have closed. They know that any slight announcement can result in voter suppression because
many will not bother voting if they believe their candidate's chances are impossible. We were inundated with weeks of
polls in battleground states placing Trump and Republican Senate candidates behind by seven, eight, even 10 or more
points — even though the races actually proved to be neck-and-neck.
The Steal Is
On. While Donald Trump amassed huge, seemingly insurmountable leads in key states across the country,
Democratic officials went quiet in their cities, releasing no results until it was clear exactly how many they would need to
win. And then, like a cascade, they poured out the numbers on Wednesday morning, claiming staggering early-vote margins
that washed away the president's lead in state after state. Democrats have terrible policies for America, but give them
credit for one thing: They know when to count their ballots. [...] The con was in the works long before Election
Day. For months beforehand, the press bombarded the public with bogus polls showing huge leads for Biden in almost
every swing state. On election night, these worthless polls were exposed, but they were still used by the press to justify
not calling states for Trump. Now, they will be used to justify dramatic last-second swings into the Democratic column.
already know who lost the election: MSM pollsters. It may be uncertain who will win, what with Democrats
shutting vote counting overnight in Michigan, Nevada, and Pennsylvania, in order to determine how many votes the need to
"discover" so as to hand their Electoral College votes to Biden, but the mainstream pollsters were all wrong.
Hilariously so, in some cases. The Real Clear Politics average of presidential polls had Biden ahead in the popular
vote by 7.2%. With votes yet to be counted, the margin favoring Biden is 1.6%, a difference of 5.8%. Whatever the final
vote is, there is no "blue wave," no Biden landslide, and the call by Nate Silver of a 90% chance of a Biden victory looks overstated.
To Pollsters: "You Have No Idea What You're Doing". "This is the worst return on investment in the
history of American politics," Lindsey Graham quipped in his upbeat victory speech overnight. Graham meant the hundreds
of millions of dollars that "all the liberals in California and New York" spent on Senate races in South Carolina, Kentucky,
and North Carolina, among others. The same can be said about all of the effort and money poured into polling this
cycle. Graham also took a shot at pollsters in the same breath, telling them, "You have no idea what you're doing."
Fact check: mostly true.
Last Call for the Pollsters?
As Americans make their way to the voting booths, only one thing is certain: someone is very wrong about this election.
According to big media polls, Joe Biden is set for either a modest win over President Trump, or an Obama-besting landslide and total
refutation of President Trump's four years in the White House. A divide never greater. And the polls agree. One
pollster embodies both sides of this divide. The USC Dornsife Daybreak tracking poll has Joe Biden 11 points ahead of
President Trump with 53 percent of the vote. That poll also finds President Trump within either three or 0.4 percentage
points of Joe Biden and on course for an Electoral College victory. How? Researchers ask two additional and separate
questions alongside the main poll question.
Positivity. We are at the point where polls are pretty much meaningless, but I don't think it is coincidental
that 2020 is just about a carbon copy of 2016. Most "mainstream" pollsters gave Biden a big lead early, I think for the
purpose of aiding Democratic fundraising and discouraging Republicans, and then, in the last days before the election, they
show the race tightening to within the margin of error — I suspect because they have changed their weighting of
responses — so that no matter what happens, they can't be "wrong."
Past The Narratives — Two Election Points to Remember. [Scroll down] All exit polling is
pushed by media in their effort to create a self-fulfilling prophecy. The election year media polling is already skewed
with manipulated outcomes; they do the same thing with the exit polling, only they do it on election day in rapid
succession. Again, just a brief reminder: if the media are willing to set up planted audience members to the
benefit of Joe Biden (they have); and if the media are willingly and purposefully going to manipulate debate moderators,
debate questions and non-questions, and town-hall audience scripts to undermine President Trump (again, they have); then what
do you think those same media outlets are doing with their polling? Put another way: If the media are willing to
create intentionally false impressions for broadcast what are they doing with the polling they are paying for?
Tag team: Polls, media join forces to close in on Trump.
Fast and furious: That is how the polls are arriving at the moment, cascading into news coverage as Election Day looms
large. In the past 48 hours, horse race polls were released by NBC News/Wall Street Journal, Fox News, CBS News, CNN,
ABC/Washington Post, The New York Times/Siena College and Emerson College. More are on the way. These surveys are
intricate and often embellished with findings that gauge voter enthusiasm, push Democratic nominee Joseph R. Biden's lead in
swing states, or compare his personality traits with those of President Trump. Such findings often make their way into
headlines that produce bad optics for Mr. Trump and conflicting or mixed messages for voters.
will win again, then comes the hard part. The polls are wrong again, and this time we have advance evidence
beyond Trump's say-so. Polling has always been an inexact science, and now it's harder than ever. It's hard to
get a representative sampling of actual voters by making random telephone calls to people whose willingness to participate
and trust of media pollsters are skewed politically. In addition, pollsters have shifted from honest reporters to
dishonest campaign tools. They deliberately slant their polls toward their favored candidates on the theory that people
are more likely to vote for the candidate who's winning. That's why we have a poll from the New York Times reporting
that Trump is trailing by four points in Texas. Have they ever been to Texas?
journalist receives AP survey, laughs out loud at huge bias in questions. [Scroll down] The poll goes on
to ask many questions that are intentionally, manipulatively inaccurate, and others that are structured to allow the AP to
interpret to suit its predetermined goal. For example, in attempting to gauge the respondent's primary issues of
importance, one question asked if the "economic downturn" would factor into his selection process. The possible answers
to that question range from "very likely" to "not at all." The obvious question is what economic downturn, but the poll
does not allow one to ask. Essentially, the poll attempts to subconsciously plant the idea that some undisputed
"economic downturn" is taking place. Was the question referencing the economic downturn in Democrat-run, riot- and
looting-ridden cities that have shut down and forbidden life outside liberal rabble-rousing? If so, it should clearly
state such. That is not what the poll's intention is, though. It is nothing more than a thinly veiled attempt to
imply that the economy is not improving under President Donald Trump — something categorically false, deceptive,
and intentional on the part of the AP.
Electoral College Prediction That Will Leave the Left 'Terribly Shocked'. We're either right or wrong.
There is no in-between here concerning the polls. These liberal outlets are oversampling Democrats, ignoring Trump
Democrats, not accounting for fewer young voters turning out, and including way too many college-educated voters to craft a
narrative that this country holds a D+15 electorate. It's just not true. Trump Democrats are being ignored.
Rural Republicans are being bypassed. The suburban cohort of the GOP — sure. They're the squishiest
and most vocally anti-Trump of the group. At Trump's rallies, around 25 percent of the attendees didn't vote in 2016.
Some firms haven't even moved off from registered voter samples. It's a trainwreck. Biden is supposedly ahead by
double-digits, which his camp says is not true. They're admitting the polls are inflated, which could also be a ploy to
keep their base anxious and ready to vote.
[the] Media Are Rigging [the] Election Against Half The Country. Here's How. [Scroll down] Another
way corporate media have been rigging the election has been through their polling narratives. For months, the media
have been relentlessly pushing a narrative that Trump can not win the 2020 election. They almost seem to be in a
contest to see who can make the most outrageous claim about a given state. In 2016, the Real Clear Politics average of
polls of Wisconsin showed that Hillary Clinton would defeat Donald Trump by 6.5 points. In fact, she lost that state to
Trump, narrowly. You would think that this result, and the result in general, might produce some humility on the part
of media pollsters. In its final 2016 poll, Marquette reported that Clinton would win by six points. This week,
that same pollster reported Biden would win by five points. By comparison, the Washington Post and ABC News dropped a
poll claiming that Biden was going to win by 17 points. Even their previous poll gave Biden "only" a six-point
lead. Marquette's previous poll advantage was the same as their more recent advantage. Guess which poll got
massive media coverage.
Can We Trust
Pennsylvania's Polls? Polls show Mr. Biden leading by five to 13 points, but I grew up around here and am
dubious. This place — the land of hoagies and Bradley Cooper and Rocky Balboa worship and Tina Fey's "Cousin
Karen" accent — has transmogrified into Trumplandia. "He has so much more support than in 2016, because it's
been four years of accomplishments," said Darinna Thompson, 49, a homemaker who was talking with a group of women outside the
Trump Store. They were part of a caravan that had just encircled the Democrats' rally "to say bye-bye to Biden" and let
his supporters know they were outnumbered.
believe the polls — Trump is winning. While the majority of the polls suggest that Democratic
presidential nominee Joe Biden is leading, or at best that it's close, those polls suffer from at least three problems.
First, the tone of the questions. There is significant evidence from behavioral psychology that suggests that the way a
question is framed predetermines the range of potential answers. In fact, Gallup has found that respondents can answer
very differently to questions with the same topic even in the same survey based on the language that's used. And the
use of metaphors can even dwarf the importance of preexisting differences between Republicans and Democrats. One of the
reasons respondents do that is because of a tendency to give socially desirable answers, which was the case especially during
the 2016 election.
Poll Counts Shy Voters and Donald Trump Wins. USC Dornlife published a poll Monday that shows President Trump
could upset the world again next week. USC's normal, tracking poll shows Biden up nationally 53 to 43 percent, a full
ten points. Something USC Dornlife was curious about, though, were those shy Trump voters who either lie to pollsters
out of contempt for the establishment media or due to a legitimate fear of expressing a preference for Trump in a country
where you can lose your job, have your property vandalized, or find yourself physically assaulted for doing so.
Markets and the Elections. [Scroll down] In a prediction market, purchasable shares have binary outcomes
of paying either $1 if an event occurs, or zero if it does not. Share prices reflect in cents adding up to $1 the
designated probabilities of opposed outcomes. For example, Polymarket shares for the question "Will Trump win the 2020
U.S. presidential election?" recently traded at "Yes" $.36 and "No" $.64, reflecting an estimation that President Donald
Trump has a 36 percent chance of reelection, while Augur gives Trump a 55% chance.
There Is Still Hope in the
Heartland. If you believe the polls, Joe Biden is neck-and-neck with Trump in Ohio. [...] But nobody believes
the polls, especially when the numbers are starkly contradicted by on-the-ground evidence like the proliferation of roadside
Trump signs. There is an unmistakable enthusiasm gap between the two presidential campaigns — Trump drawing
tens of thousands of cheering supporters to his rallies, while only dozens show up for the rare events when Biden ventures
out of his Delaware basement.
One Tells You About Polls that Project a Big Win for Trump. Most election polls include a question that
pollsters rarely talk about: whom do you expect to win. Yet, the answer to this question is more accurate than
any other election forecasting tool. By a lot. Finding the answers to this question is tricky. You
have to get hold of the raw datasets and do the math yourself. Pollsters do not publish expectation data.
Trump's Best Presidential
Debate Ever. Like so many others, I have no idea how sharply accurate or wildly inaccurate the polls are.
Unlike people polled about anything else, the one polling topic that is dangerous for many is to say that one supports
Trump for President. You might get suspended from your job. You might get fired. There may be a Twitter
storm aimed at destroying you. You may get thrown off Facebook or Instagram or even from LinkedIn. Pollsters
never before have conducted polls under Stalinist Russia circumstances, where people are terrified even to whisper "I back
... Trump" or to wear a red MAGA hat or to affix a bumper sticker. Indeed, one of the best (or worst) ways to hurt
someone you hate is to put a "Make America Great Again" bumper sticker on their car — and then to look at the
smashed windshield and other vandalism a few hours later. So it is impossible to know what the polls mean.
the Polls May be Wrong Again. Polls and pundits were wrong across the board prior to the 2016 presidential
election. Indeed, the anti-Trump spin was so universal with pollsters and journalists in the last presidential election,
that even three and a half years later, it's hard to believe that there wasn't a conspiracy to cook the books to discourage
Trump voters. With another election pending, pollsters seem to be having hot flashes of déjà vu.
Donald Trump is again universally cast as the dark horse. But this year there is some clear evidence to explain why
polls and media alike may be misreading or misrepresenting the numbers.
Impresario President Will Get an Encore. For anyone with any perspective on American elections, it is clear
that the polls do not entitle us to predict with any confidence the outcome of the current campaign. Many of the polls
included in the average of polls on aggregator sites are really just the products of Democratic Party front organizations,
such as Vox, Politico, Quinnipiac, Monmouth, and others whose chief function is to facilitate the Democratic media locker
room cry that they've already won and the counting of the votes is practically superfluous. Open the beer kegs!
The Trump tyranny is already over. Trafalgar, the only poll that showed Trump winning four years ago, shows him winning
again this year. And the next most accurate of polls that covered the 2016 campaign and are doing so again is
Rasmussen, which has fluctuated and briefly joined the ranks of the Biden victory celebration squad two weeks ago but now has
Trump's approval rating back at 48 percent.
Poll: Joe Biden's Lead Narrows to Just 1.1%. Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden and President
Donald Trump are statistically tied in Pennsylvania, a Restoration PAC/Trafalgar Group survey released Monday —
nearly two weeks out from the presidential election — revealed. The survey, taken October 13-15 among 1,041
likely voters, showed Trump narrowing the gap in Pennsylvania, with Biden leading by just 1.1 percent — 47.5
percent to the president's 46.4 percent. As has been the emerging theme in several recent surveys in key Rust Belt
states, Biden's lead is within the margin of error, which is +/- 2.96 percent.
Headed to Philadephia, and the Reason Is in the Numbers — Bad Numbers for Joe Biden. The media is
attempting to capture the public's attention with poll numbers in the hope that Trump partisans will become despondent about
a looming loss, and then not take the trouble to vote. Four years ago the conventional wisdom was that Hillary
Clinton's massive organizational advantages when combined with incumbency of the Democrat Obama Administration, validated the
near-universal view of pollsters that Clinton was going to cruise to an easy victory. But the combination of
"conservatism," "nationalism", and "populism" that Trump combined together, and then took directly to the electorate over the
heads of media produced an "electorate" remarkably different from the one predicted by the pollsters in their models.
But polling is polling, it's an art, not a science. One thing not factored into the model changes from 2016 to 2020 is
how changes in party registration alter the composition of the electorate that shows up at the polls.
the FakeNews Polls a Setup for Post-Election Chaos? [Scroll down] If the polls are correct, a ticket of
two unlikeable and corrupt candidates, with resumes of no accomplishment other than self-enrichment through financial or
sexual services, are about to win an historic blowout election. What if they are wrong? If the perky weathergirl
on the morning news predicts sunny skies in the mid-70s all day and you look outside and see snow flurries, what are you
going to believe? If one tunes out the polls and looks at the real world, a far different picture emerges.
President Trump is holding rallies again, sometimes several in one day, each one drawing tens of thousands of people,
including many Democrats and previous nonvoters. When Harris or Biden hold a rally, attendees measure in the few dozens
at best, most of those being reporters or Secret Service.
Bias of the American Left. [Scroll down] Pollsters used to highlight moderate liberal leads to jack up
enthusiasm. But in the final few days of a race, they began offering more realistic numbers to ensure that if the vote
went south, they would not go down with the ship. Not now. At a time when the Zogby, Trafalgar, Democracy
Institute, or Rasmussen polls show Trump's favorability climbing, and the race tightening in the last three weeks, we are to
believe YouGov, Reuters, or Politico that the president fights a 10-15 percent negative favorability gap.
Perhaps. But one wonders why, in the context of 2016, we never saw a symmetrical split, half of the polls believing
Trump would lose sizably in the Electoral College, and half winning by a substantial number.
on the bright side: 15 reasons the polls may be wrong. When people ask me to predict whether Trump or Biden
will win the election, I like to say that I don't predict elections; I just worry about them. However, as a worrier,
I'm always on the lookout for signs that will ease my worries. With the election only 17 days away, there are a
surprising number of signs that Biden's allegedly spectacular polling lead is illusory. Before beginning this post
about identifying positive trends, it's important to remember that the polls — both state-by-state and
national — are still showing Biden in the lead.
pollster: I predict a Trump win in the mid-270s. A change of pace for you from all the polling doom and
gloom lately. Most readers know the name "Trafalgar" at this point, but for the few who don't: They're the firm
that called Trump's wins in Michigan and Pennsylvania four years ago when nearly every other pollster was predicting Clinton
victories, some by blowout margins. (Trafalgar was the only outfit to find Trump ahead in Michigan in any survey taken that
year.) Two years later, with the rest of the field polling field expecting an Andrew Gillum victory in Florida, Trafalgar's
final poll found Ron DeSantis ahead. Again, they were right, everyone else was wrong. Their secret is that they
try to adjust for "social desirability bias," the reluctance of some people to tell pollsters the truth about their
preferences for fear of being judged disapprovingly.
real reason most polls in this election are not trustworthy. [Scroll down] Most polls today are conducted
by phone. During election seasons the number of these polls has skyrocketed in recent years, so that a registered and
likely voter such as myself and my wife might get five to ten such calls every single day. At some point this
becomes simple harassment. You simply want them all to "go away," as my wife said. You don't have the time
or inclination to talk to them. And you don't refuse because you are afraid to tell them you are a Trump voter (my
readers will know I certainly am not afraid of telling anyone this fact) but because they have become a nuisance you simply
want nothing to do with. I therefore think none of the poll results today are trustworthy because too many people, from
all political perspectives, are simply tired of being harassed by pollsters. They are refusing to talk, and thus the
pollsters are only getting a very limited slice of opinions, from a few people who likely don't represent the general
population. The only polls that might produce reliable results would be those conducted door-to-door, but few today are
conducted in this manner.
Voters, Pollsters, and the Appeal to Ignorance. In October 2015 the most venerable name in public opinion
polling, Gallup, announced that it would no longer conduct horse-race election surveys or predict the outcomes of
presidential contests. Gallup had been the gold standard for such polling since the 1930s, but, after calling the wrong
winner in 2012, the organization's leadership decided that capturing a representative voter sample during the final volatile
phase of a national election had become all but impossible. Gallup was thus spared the humiliation endured by many
pollsters in 2016. Most of its counterparts, however, remain in denial about the limitations of their obsolete methodology
and are consequently producing wildly inaccurate 2020 results.
patterns give Trump an edge invisible to polls: JPMorgan. The 2020 presidential race may be closer than
the polls suggest, according to an analysis of voter registration trends by JPMorgan Chase. Changes in the number of
voters registered to each of the major parties have proven to be a significant variable in election outcomes in the past,
according to strategists at the New York-based bank, which analyzed trends in some of the battleground states that will be
crucial to an electoral college victory. Former Vice President Joe Biden leads President Trump by 9.2 points
nationally, according to an average of polls compiled by RealClearPolitics, but his lead is at a tighter 4.9 points
in hotly contested states.
cockiness and its hazards. More so than his colleagues, [Warren] Mitofsky was a student of the history of
survey research. In speeches, he was known to refer to such pioneers of the field as George Gallup and Elmo
Roper. Mitofsky kept displayed on a wall the famous photograph of President Harry Truman in victory, holding aloft the
front page of the Chicago Tribune that erroneously declared he'd lost the 1948 presidential election to Republican Thomas E.
Dewey. "There's still a lot of room for humility in polling," Mitofsky said in an interview at the 50th anniversary of
the 1948 polling debacle. "Every time you get cocky, you lose."
Media Poll Narrative, Trump Tracking Just Fine In Electoral College. [Scroll down] The media like to use
polls to set very powerful narratives during a campaign. The narrative is frequently that the race is not winnable for
the Republican. The polls get more reasonable closer to election day, regardless of who wins, and the false narrative
gets forgotten. Throughout 2016, the narrative put forth day in and day out by the media was that Donald Trump simply
couldn't win. Sure, the final polls weren't off as dramatically as that narrative was, but the narrative is pushed at
least in part because it advances the political agenda of the media. The wish frequently becomes reality. The
media have pushed the same narrative this time as well, if a bit more angrily. Four years ago, pundits said the race
was over because of how Trump was polling. According to those same polls in the same key battleground states, he's
doing a bit better than he was doing four years ago.
the Top Line Poll Numbers. The first thing to understand about the Democratic Party today is that its shift to
the left has occurred chiefly among white Democrats. This may be the hidden weakness that delivers the election to
Trump. Let's start with a new chart from Zach Goldberg, who notes survey data from the spring about Democratic voters
in Arizona, California, Colorado, and Texas. What it shows is revealing: white Democrats are the most hostile
group to increased security along the U.S.-Mexico border, while black Democrats favor increased security more than
white Democrats by a two-to-one margin. Even hispanic Democrats favor stronger border security than white Democrats do.
Carolina's Registration and Polling Suggests Democrats Overestimate Their 2020 Chances. Over the past week, I
have been analyzing registration numbers for several of the battleground states. Each of them has the little
idiosyncrasies that make them a unique story, but North Carolina's story is extremely interesting in that current polling
shows a lead for Biden, despite other data suggesting that a small lead is likely a tie to a 2-3 point lead for Trump.
Thus far, of the polls that I have seen, sampling has been wrong, either in the age groups which they poll (one poll had like
32% of the electorate being 18-24) and/or the ideological spread for voters, with the party distribution being quasi-accurate
and then realizing they polled very few solid conservatives and a lot of moderates. I started by looking at
registration statistics for the Tarheel State, which tells a much different story than the Dem-shift that we are hearing in
feeling about this election. [In 2016,] President Trump took Erie County 57,168 to 54,820, a 2-point win, which
was a point better than his statewide 1-point win. If Biden were ahead by 7, then he would be ahead by 6 in Erie, which
is a bellwether of sorts for the state. I mean, Obama got 57% of Erie County's vote in 2012, which was 5 points
better than his statewide total of 52%. Perhaps it is possible to be down in Erie but up statewide. But the last
time Erie got it wrong was in 1988 when it went for Dukakis and the rest of the state went for Bush. The last time
before that was 1944, when it went for Dewey instead of FDR. I will take a county that was right about how its state
voted in 95% of the last 20 elections. Democrats sweating Erie is an indication that gee, maybe, that 7-point lead is
as believable as an email from a Nigerian prince.
Alert: Proof Biden Is Not Winning. Back in 2016, I played Paul Revere, except my announcement was "The
Trump victory is coming! the Trump victory is coming!" I made over 1,500 TV and radio appearances to deliver the message that
the polls were all wrong. I told Donald Trump supporters again and again to ignore the "fake news" and the fake polls.
Tens of thousands of Trump voters emailed me to thank me for giving them hope when all seemed lost. Hundreds of conservative
radio and TV hosts thanked me for keeping up the spirits of the "Trump Army" when Trump voters were at their darkest and lowest
points. For better or worse, that's my best talent in life: seeing through the faulty math, lies, fraud and propaganda
of pollsters and the mainstream media in order to keep Trump voters excited, motivated, focused and in the game.
Have Only 3% of President Trump's Online Viewership. The 2020 campaign is shaping up to become one of the most
lopsided elections in history. The media wants us to believe Biden is ahead in the polls but the President Trump is
crushing Biden in events and viewership, in person and online. The Democrats and their media continue to force their
garbage polls down Americans' throats. But the reason we know their polls are garbage is by looking at the data.
Three Censor Poll Showing Majority Say They're Better Off Now than 4 Years Ago. It turns out the ABC, CBS and
NBC evening news shows won't show you polls that show the majority of the American voters feeling better off now under
President Donald Trump's economy than under former President Barack Obama's economy. But they do love parading around
questionable polls showing Trump losing the election by double digits. Gallup released a jaw-dropping news released
Tuesday, the day of the vice presidential debate. A new poll, taken between September 14 [and] September 28,
showed that 56 percent of registered voters said that "they are better off now than they were four years ago, while 32% said
they are worse off." That's a 24 percent disparity.
56% Americans Say They Are Better Off Now Under Trump Than Four Years Ago Under Obama-Biden. A solid majority
of 56 percent of Americans say they are better off now than they were four years ago, a new Gallup survey reveals. Only
32 percent say they are worse off than four years ago. The number is, as Fox News's Laura Ingraham noted on Thursday
night, "the highest Gallup has ever recorded." [...] While the 56 percent number is impressive indeed — again the
highest ever recorded this close to an election — it was even higher before the coronavirus pandemic swept across
the United States.
The Editor says...
The news media won't mention this poll, because if it is accurate, then the polls showing Joe Biden with a substantial lead over
President Trump can't be right. The MSM, on Joe Biden's behalf, is suppressing the poll that's most likely to be accurate.
the public, even liberals, should want Amy Coney Barrett. The Washington Examiner/YouGov poll published
on Wednesday reveals a public passionate about, and deeply split on, the Supreme Court. Perhaps surprisingly, given
this, it also reveals a public averse to extremes. For fully 79%, the appointment of a new justice will weigh heavily
when they vote in the presidential election, with 58% regarding it as "very important." But agreement here doesn't imply
concurrence over how the matter should be handled; 51% say the nomination should wait until after the election and 42% want
it done now. The poll's 3.6% margin of error means that split could be as close as 47%-46%.
Opinion Polls — Déjà vu All Over Again? A recent NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll
conducted Sept. 30 to Oct. 1 showed Joe Biden with a 14-point lead over President Trump, 53 to 39 percent, up
from an 8 point lead a week earlier. That's it then, game over. Time for Biden to start packing for his move from
his basement to the White House. [Screenshot] Who was polled to give Biden such a commanding lead? Looking at the
poll internals, something the media prefers to hide, reveals that registered, not likely, voters were surveyed, one strike against
the poll. As elections move closer to election date, that calls the sample into question. Given that voter turnout for
presidential elections is typically just over 50 percent, half of those surveyed won't vote, regardless of their opinions.
Of the 800 registered voters surveyed, Democrats were oversampled by 9 points, 45 to 36 percent, explaining much of
Joe's supposed 14 point advantage.
Left's 'Mostly Peaceful' Revolution/Coup. Since the advent of the Trump presidency, the left engaged their
greatest minds in planning the "Russia Hoax Coup" and then the impeachment farce. Having failed miserably at both, they
are now carrying out an information operation to sell maundering Joe Biden as inevitable in his attempt to win the coming
Presidential Election. They insist that Joseph Biden is leading Trump in the polls by an insurmountable 16%. [...] Joe
Biden is not winning. It does not matter what the polls say. It is preposterous to believe that people would vote
for someone in such obvious mental decline for the most important (and dangerous) job on the planet. The man almost
never leaves his basement and when he meets with voters, he can barely fill a room, whereas Trump packs stadiums and their
environs with many thousands of screaming, enthusiastic supporters.
It Feel Like Biden is Winning? [Scroll down] As we approach the next election, the polls again show an
insurmountably persistent Trump deficit in the popular vote and even in key battleground states. Poll aggregator Nate
Silver estimates Trump's approval to be below Obama, Clinton, and Reagan at similar points in their presidencies. Silver
fixes the chance of a Biden victory at 81 percent as of his writing on October 5th. The betting markets show a
recent collapse in confidence that Trump will be reelected. So why doesn't it feel like Biden is winning? If we
had no polls, betting markets, or professional pontificators, what outcome would we predict from the things that we can
observe with our own eyes and ears?
an accurate poll? Everyone remembers the wildly inaccurate predictions of a Hillary Clinton landslide right up
through the morning of Election Day 2016. The New York Times confidently predicted Clinton with an 85-percent chance of
winning. Reuters gave Clinton a 90-percent chance, and ABC News gave her a 95-percent chance of being elected
president. I suspect that the polls were biased, in part, and their methodology was obsolete. Also, there may
have been some trickery at work with Trump voters deliberately deceiving pollsters. With this in mind, we are now being
told that Joe Biden has opened up a double-digit lead over President Trump in the latest 2020 presidential election polling
data. I submit that many Trump voters are being less than candid with pollsters, even more so than they were in 2016.
turnaround: Biden lead cut to 49%-47% as coronavirus, debate don't hurt president. In the first post poll
since President Trump announced that he had COVID-19, his chances of reelection surged, a sign that his infection and raucous
debate performance didn't hurt his chances for reelection. The new John Zogby Strategies/EMI Research Solutions survey
shared with [The Washington Examiner] showed Biden up 49% to 47%, his smallest lead yet in their polls.
Poll Bucks Media Narrative, Shows Trump Closing the Gap After COVID Diagnosis. A new poll released on Saturday
showed that President Trump has not lost favor or popularity with the American people after a raucous debate night on Tuesday
and hospitalization for COVID-19 on Friday [10/2/2020]. The poll came from John Zogby Strategies and shows that
Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden now leads the president by only two points, well within the margin of error.
The new numbers show a reduction of five full points after their previous July sampling.
This one is hard to believe: Biden
holds sizable lead over Trump among Latino voters in NBC/WSJ/Telemundo poll. Joe Biden leads President Donald
Trump by 62 percent to 26 percent among Latino registered voters nationally, but his lead trails Hillary Clinton's
advantage with this voting bloc at the same stage in 2016, according to a new NBC News/Wall Street Journal/Telemundo poll
released Sunday [9/20/2020]. The poll's respondents see Biden as better at addressing concerns of the Latino community,
at 59 percent to 18 percent, and the candidates are nearly even on who is better at dealing with the economy, with
41 percent saying Biden and 39 percent choosing Trump. Biden's 36-point lead in the presidential contest
shows that Democrats still have strong backing in the community, which could help Biden in some states where the race is tight.
the Polling on Who Should Replace Ginsburg. Not even 24 hours after Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death, multiple media
outlets were telling us that on the question of whom they prefer to replace Ginsburg on the U.S. Supreme Court, voters prefer
Joe Biden to President Trump. The Fox News headline Saturday afternoon declared that "52% trust Biden over Trump on
Supreme Court picks." [Other examples omitted for brevity.] All of this is meant to discourage President Trump,
Senate Republicans, and their supporters from moving forward with a nomination to replace Ginsburg prior to the November
elections. In other words, these polls are like most every other election-related poll in this modern drive-by media
era. They are meant to shape opinions instead of merely reporting on them.
Caution: Newsweek magazine. Fox
News Poll Shows Americans Saying Biden Is More Mentally Sound Than Trump to Serve as President. More Americans
say former Vice President Joe Biden has the mental clarity to be president versus Donald Trump, according to the latest Fox
News poll released Sunday [9/13/2020]. Despite the Trump campaign and the president himself repeatedly questioning the
mental acuity of Biden, a larger percentage of U.S. adults say they believe the Democratic presidential candidate has the
traits best suited for the job. A slight majority of likely voters — 51 percent — told Fox News
they believe Biden, 77, has the "mental soundness" to be president, compared to 47 percent who say the same about Trump, 74.
Trump voters staying silent again, duping media and pollsters. Just like in 2016, many of President Trump's
strongest supporters are staying quiet about their Election Day pick, likely misleading pollsters and the media about the
state of the presidential race. In the latest Rasmussen Reports survey of the silent supporters, the pollster said,
"Trump voters appear to be hiding their vote again this election cycle." The report said that 17% of likely voters who
"strongly approve" of Trump "are less likely to let others know how they intend to vote in the upcoming election."
Definitive Guide to Understanding Polling (and Why Most Polls Are Garbage). When reviewing polls in 2016, I
came across bad poll after bad poll as a result of oversampling problems as well as push-poll lines of questions or questions
that are framed in a way to influence the way someone answers. For instance, if a polling firm asked a question "Do you
agree with Joe Biden's call for all Americans to unite?", it doesn't leave any room for someone saying they disagree with the
premise of the question, that is, Joe Biden even having that ability in the first place. Another example of a push poll
question is "Do you support Donald Trump's divisive rhetoric?" Maybe the respondent doesn't believe Trump's rhetoric is
divisive. Maybe the respondent thinks the Democrats' rhetoric is divisive. Either way, a respondent is less likely
to respond in the affirmative to supporting divisive rhetoric and therefore would lead to a skewing of the results.
Joe Really Up by 10 Points over Trump? It has been said that numbers never lie, but statistics do. A
political poll is a relative handful of numbers statistically analyzed and adjusted to yield, hopefully, simple
results. On their best days, polls are educated guesses. On bad days, polls are outright lies. The Real
Clear Politics National Poll Average has both. [...] Now let's look at the oft cited Real Clear Politics National Poll
Average, shown below, which has Joe Biden at 7.1 percentage points over Donald Trump. Is this an accurate reflection of
the presidential race? Probably not.
Trump Voters Are Real, And They Could Decide The Election. A recent IBD/TIPP poll found something that appears
to confirm the idea that there are lots of Trump supporters out there who won't admit it to pollsters. "Overall, 20% of
registered voters say they're uncomfortable revealing their preferred candidate, but that rises to 28% among independents,"
Donald. [Scroll down] No one knows the exact state of the presidential race. The polls are all over
the place and many are weaponized. Scan Emerson, Rasmussen, Trafalgar, and Zogby polls, and Trump is near dead even or
even ahead in some key states. Read the surveys discredited after 2016 like Reuters and Politico, and Biden is winning
across the board. But all pollsters seem to concede something is terribly wrong with this increasingly discredited
institution. How can IBD/TPP assure us that in his favorability ratings Trump is down by 16 points even as Emerson
shows us he is up by two and Rasmussen by four? Something is rotten. Either the pollsters are abjectly
incompetent, or deliberately selecting flawed demographics that they know will reflect their own biases, and they do so to
add momentum to their preferred candidate. Or their subordinates who gather the data are massaging the numbers to reflect
their own choices. Or the respondents are deliberately misleading their questioners either out of fear or from spite.
Media Are Lying About The Election Again. Election 2020 is shaping up to be déjà vu all over
again for the news media. In an effort to help push Joe Biden over the finish line, the Washington establishment is
going all-in on the easily refuted idea that there has been no change in the presidential race over the last three weeks.
[...] Incredibly, both NBC News and the Cook Political Report continue to rate Florida as "Lean Democrat" according to their
"experts." No offense, but do they think people are stupid?
Drain the Swamp,
Or Be Drowned By It. President Trump's approval rating has ticked up from 41 percent to 45 percent, while his
disapproval rating has fallen from 56.5 percent to 53 percent. And these are averaging some clearly stale and dated
polls, a number of which effectively are the products of Democratic-front organizations because of the unrepresentative echelon of
voters that they canvass. Taking the most recent and reliable polls, the margin is significantly closer than that.
Knowledgeable Democratic strategists, such as former Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell on Fox News Wednesday night, agree that
approximately three points should always be added to Trump's totals to account for the reticence of many of his supporters when
speaking with pollsters. Nor will all those who disapprove of Trump necessarily vote against him, as that fact by itself
does not necessarily imply that they have a higher opinion of Joe Biden.
Reports noticed something very fishy about polling. Rasmussen published a series of tweets on Monday
[8/31/2020] openly snarking at its competitors for their silence. Moreover, whoever is writing Rasmussen's tweets was
not shy about identifying a reason for the other polling outfits' unusual reticence: the narrative up until the conventions
was that Biden was unstoppable; it's now quite possible that he's been stopped.
New Poll: Trump
Pulling Away In Texas. As other polls show that President Trump is climbing back into the race and threatening
prospective Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden's lead, a new poll conducted by YouGov finds that Trump has opened a
7-point lead over Biden in the state of Texas. "The YouGov poll, commissioned by Texas Hispanic Policy Foundation and
Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy, surveyed 846 registered voters in Texas from August 4-13. Trump had a
7-point lead over Biden, 47.5% to 40.5%, among all voters surveyed and a 5-point lead among most-likely voters, 49.4% to
44.1%," KXAN reported, adding, "Before the release of the most recent YouGov poll, Biden had topped Trump in four of the last
five statewide polls in Texas."
are wrong, Trump will beat Biden: Billionaire fund manager Gundlach. Billionaire bond fund manager
Jeffrey Gundlach believes the polls are wrong and that President Trump will win a second term in the White House. "Will
Joe Biden beat Donald Trump in November? I don't think so," Gundlach, CEO and chief investment officer of Los
Angeles-based DoubleLine Capital, which has $148 billion in assets under management, said in a webcast on Tuesday evening,
according to Bloomberg. He added that a "highly toxic political environment" makes the polls "very, very squishy."
Tide Turns Toward Trump. The polls have improved not just for Trump but for the Republicans running downticket
too, not that we should put great store in the polls. Keep in mind that the polls were literally the only indicator
showing Biden and the Dems were winning. There's no other manifestation of a blue wave out there. Do you see any
Biden signs? There's just one in my neighborhood, which is all LA suburban woke wine women, and that's in a creepy
house that the children fear. No, there are no Trump signs either, but then that would invite a hassle.
and Debates — Summertime Blues for Democrats. Polls are breaking Trump's way. I don't mean the
litany of polls showing a double-digit lead for Biden, just as they did for Hillary Clinton four years ago, oversampling
Democrats and polling whoever answers the phone rather than likely voters. The Democracy Institute/Sunday Express poll
is the first big media poll to show Trump with a lead over Biden, by 48 to 46 percent. More importantly they note,
["]Crucially, President Trump has a lead of 48 percent to 43 percent in the swing states Florida, Iowa, Michigan,
Minnesota, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin which would put him back in the White House with an electoral college tally of 309 to
Biden's 229.["] What happened to those polls predicting another Democrat landslide electoral victory?
Where are these Trump supporters coming from?
The Shadow of Dukakis Looms Over
Biden. At this point in the 1988 presidential cycle, it was taken for granted among pundits and professional
prognosticators that Massachusetts Gov. Michael Dukakis would defeat Vice President George H. W. Bush by a comfortable
margin. Moreover, public opinion seemed to confirm the conventional wisdom. At the end of July, two major polls,
Gallup and Harris, had published voter surveys showing Dukakis ahead of Bush by 17 and 18 points, respectively.
Meanwhile, the media consistently portrayed the vice president as a dull-witted wimp and represented the Massachusetts
governor as a hyper-competent technocrat. Just over 90 days later Bush won the popular vote by seven points and the
Electoral College 426-111.
Piece on What Critical Swing Voters Are Thinking Now. If you just listened to the liberal media, pretty much
all you would hear is polls show that Joe Biden is ahead. We saw how well that worked for them when they predicted
Hillary Clinton would win in 2016. That's why it's incredibly important to hear what real people are thinking. So
listen to what Rich Thau, a focus group moderator, the moderator of the Swing Voter Project, has to say. He says
he's hearing strong support for President Trump from critical swing voters that could turn the election.
Fake News Polls Hiding a Potential Trump Landslide? Listen to network or cable news and you will hear that the
November election is over. Joe Biden has a growing double-digit lead over President Trump, despite the election being
over three months away and the issues that may decide the election largely unknown at present. What do the polls
say? Biden's campaign manager, also known as CNN, has their "poll of polls" described as, "the five most recent
national telephone polls measuring the view of registered voters." Considering that only 58 percent of eligible voters went
to the polls in 2016, CNN's "poll of polls" may not be particularly representative of the electorate. CNN's headline
screams déjà vu, "Biden maintains a double-digit lead over Trump nationally." That's it then, the election
is over. Trump supporters may as well pack it up and stay home. At least that is what they want you to believe.
the Battleground Polls. It seems that President Trump is trailing in the polls again. In other "shocking"
news, it seems that only women menstruate; "green energy" is a massive scam; Trump-Russia collusion was a massive hoax; media
leftists hate America; and on everything from masks to guns to lives that matter, liberals are hypocrites.
Americans — especially Trump supporters — should pay little to no attention to the national polls on
the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Such polls are usually not designed to inform us — as they
should — but rather to form public opinion. This is true of the polls in the so-called "battleground" states
as well. Twenty sixteen provides the valuable lesson here.
Why Aren't the Media Polling and Reporting in-Depth on the
Riots? Up until a few weeks ago, late June or early July, media constantly polled Americans' attitudes toward
the ongoing street protests over the death of George Floyd. Those polls consistently found that Americans generally
supported the protests. But if you Google "poll Americans reactions to city violence" you'll see something
interesting. The media appears to have stopped polling about the protests/riots. [...] Sometime in late June or early
July the polling on the riots and what to do about them appears to have stopped. Or, at least, the reporting on the
polling stopped. Insert the thinking emoji here. Why would media stop polling on an ongoing issue that is
affecting the entire national mood and discourse, the function of some of our largest cities, how we see and depict our
history, and, by the way, the upcoming presidential election? What if the media didn't stop polling about this?
They just stopped reporting on their polls. Now, why would they do that? Insert that thinking emoji again.
in America Badly Needs a Service Check. One doesn't have to be a pollster to appreciate that an improper sample
size, an over-represented subgroup, confusingly-worded questions, or a number of other factors can skew poll results one way
or the other. And that's if the pollster is honestly trying to reflect reality. The higher the stakes, the
greater the temptation to make the gauge produce the desired reading. Of course, pollsters will complain about the mass
movement to cell phones, or the trend for people to let it go to voice mail, or even people lying to just get those annoying
survey-takers off their phone. All of these undoubtedly complicate accurate polling. But, honestly, a disturbing
percentage of poll results nowadays just don't ring true. They don't pass the smell test.
Joe's In a Pickle — Young People Are Not Getting Behind Senile Septuagenarian Joe Biden. The left
has been using polls since before Ann Coulter wrote her masterpiece "Slander" in 2002. In the book where she shows the many
liberal lies against the American right, Coulter points out how polls are used by Democrats to discourage conservatives, bias
and steal elections. We certainly say how Democrats and their Mainstream Media (MSM) used dishonest polls in the last
election. Day after day we were told how Hillary was going to run away with the election. Then came the election —
they were all wrong — Hillary was steamrolled with outsider Trump winning more than 30 states (30 states plus
one delegate in Maine) and crushing Hillary in the electoral college with a 3 to 2 margin.
Has Already Won the 2020 Election. Given the polls, you would think anyone positing Donald Trump has already
won the 2020 election was some kind of blithering idiot — and maybe I am. (I've been called worse.) But I
can't help but think that in current conditions the polls are not only not worth the paper they're printed on, digital or
otherwise, they're about as accurate as a thermometer run over by a six-wheeler. No one sensible is talking about their
political allegiance these days in public — especially to an anonymous pollster. Instead, they're buying
guns, in record numbers.
Pence: 'I Think Polling Is Broken in America'. Vice President Mike Pence dismissed recent polling showing
President Donald Trump behind former Vice President Joe Biden by as much as double digits in the 2020 presidential
race. "I think polling is broken in America," he told Breitbart News in an exclusive interview on Air Force 2,
returning from a campaign trip to Wisconsin. "I didn't believe the polls in 2016, and I don't believe the polls in 2020."
We Shouldn't Believe Polling About Trump. Many conservatives are concerned about polling results regarding
conservative issues, especially about President Trump. For example, the latest CNN poll found that 51% of voters
believe the president should be impeached. How much credence should conservatives give these polls? [...] One of the
pervasive [...] lies people take for granted is the results of political polls, especially in the Trump era. Most polls
show him behind several of the myriad candidates vying to represent Democrats in the 2020 election. But the American
Association for Public Opinion Research confirms that "national polls in 2016 tended to under-estimate Trump's support
significantly more than Clinton's." We are inundated with the latest polling on President Trump's approval
rating and how people are likely to vote in the 2020 election. Both bode poorly for the president, but he doesn't
believe them and neither should we.
Poll: Joe Biden at 'Abysmal' 26 Percent Approval Among Young Voters. As 2020 presidential election polls
continue to show Joe Biden trouncing President Donald Trump, a recent survey should spook the campaign of the Democratic
candidate. The Meet the Press politics team flagged that Biden has surprisingly bad numbers with young voters in
an NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll released last week. Biden's favorability among voters aged 18 to 34 is
26 percent positive, 44 negative. That means the former vice president is 18 points underwater.
Meet the Press described those numbers as "abysmal."
Have the Winning Hand. The Democrats and their media toadies have used polls for the last two months to create
the illusion of an inevitable Biden victory on November 3. CNN's aptly named Don Lemon, that pillar of impartiality, tells us
Trump's "number's up." The political analysis operation FiveThirtyEight breathlessly advised last week that Biden was on the
verge of opening up a "landslide" lead. These are standard partisan political tactics. The fact that Trump is now
returning upwards in key polls illustrates again that no matter what is thrown at him he is practically indestructible.
Why the Polls Predict Trump
Will Win. Lately, pollsters and pundits have been nervously pondering the following question: "If Trump is
behind in the polls, why do most voters say, in the same surveys, that he will win the upcoming election?" As Harry Enten
recently noted at CNN, "An average of recent polls finds that a majority of voters (about 55%) believe that Trump will defeat
Biden in the election. Trump's edge on this question has remained fairly consistent over time." This is far more than
mere statistical curiosity by number nerds. Several peer-reviewed studies have shown that surveys of voter expectations
are far more predictive of election outcomes than polls of voter intentions. The polls that appear to portend a
one-term presidency for Trump actually predict that the president will trounce Biden badly this November.
opens up 11-point national lead over Trump in NBC News/WSJ poll. Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee
Joe Biden holds a double-digit lead nationally over President Donald Trump, with 7 in 10 voters saying the country is on the
wrong track, and majorities disapproving of the president's handling of the coronavirus and race relations.
Democrats don't believe Joe Biden's polling numbers.
Since the beginning of the 2020 campaign season, Donald Trump has been behind in almost every single poll. When there
were 16 Democrats running, America was presented with polls showing that he'd lose to almost every single one of
them — and now that the nominee is former Vice President Joe Biden, we are shown polls weekly that have
Mr. Biden ahead by more than 10 points, as well as winning every battleground state. Those numbers seem not
only illogical, but unbelievable — because they are — and the behavior of Democrats backs that
up. Democrats are acting with the same grasping-for-straws panic that they have been since 2016. After Hillary Clinton
lost, there were excuses — then they blamed Russian collusion, James Comey, obstruction of justice, something
about a phone call to Ukraine ... the list goes on and on. It was a manic cacophony of noise with evidence ranging from
anonymous sources all the way to people who cashed in on their government service by selling anti-Trump books. Surely,
a political party with such a commanding lead wouldn't need to do any of this, right?
Why I ignore
the polls. It was 29th November 2015, election results day in Bihar, one of the most populous states in
India. Almost every poll, including exit polls, had predicted a landslide victory for the challenger the National
Democratic Alliance, i.e. NDA. [...] The NDA lead began to wane, in an hour then the current government had a slim
lead. The lead grew bigger and bigger, by mid-day, it was clear that they were re-elected. Some news personnel
offered perfunctory apologies, others blamed the people for lying to the pollsters, and some refrained from talking about the
polls and proceeded as if nothing had happened. This isn't the first time and it most certainly won't be the last time
that polls got it so appallingly wrong. The big question is why do these polling agencies that consistently committed
calamitous mistakes continue to be treated with the utmost reverence and reverence by news organizations?
Polls Look A
Lot Like 2016, Take 'With a Grain of Salt' Experts Say. Polls indicate Joe Biden is the favorite to win in
November — but 2016 sends a different message. An overwhelming majority of polls four years ago also
indicated Donald Trump would lose, tempering voters confidence in the latest round of surveys in key battleground states,
according to USA Today. And just as they did in 2016, polls in 2020 once again show Trump losing in Michigan,
Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. The director of the Marquette Law School poll said 2016 is "a reason to be very cautious."
Shows Trump on Track to Win Reelection. A new poll conducted by the Washington based Democracy Institute for
the Sunday Express shows President Trump tied with his rival Joe Biden at 47 percent, but surpassing him in the
electoral college 309 to 229. These positive results for Trump come amid a constant drumbeat of negative media coverage
in recent weeks that paints his electoral chances in November as virtually nil. According to the shock poll, Trump is
"on course to win the crucial swing states including Florida, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin where he
outpolls Vice President Biden by 48 percent to 44 percent."
unclear if the polls about Trump currently mean anything. The polls have been in the news lately because
Democrats are celebrating the lead Biden appears to hold while Republicans are worried that the Wuhan virus lockdowns and
Black Lives Matters riots will harm Trump. Three news items, however, illustrate just how meaningless polls are in
If It's All A Lie? [Scroll down] Didn't there arise in your mind, that agonizing Wednesday morning after
Mrs. Clinton's ruination, just the faintest notion that you had been lied to? You tracked the polls, and you
reviewed the percentages — most hovering above 90% — that assured you that the glass ceiling was in for
an epic shattering. And yet, no shattering was forthcoming. Whether expressly or by omission, you were lied
to. And it is happening again.
Learned Nothing after their 2016 Polling Disaster. Harken back four years ago and recall how the media
confidently predicted a Hillary Clinton landslide electoral victory over Donald Trump. They held firm to this
prediction even when the election was all but over. At 10:20 PM ET on November 8, 2016, election night, the New York
Times confidently proclaimed, in the manner of Baghdad Bob, that Hillary Clinton had an 85 percent chance of winning the
election. Long faces and tears graced cable news election night coverage shows by then and Hillary probably was on her
second bottle of chardonnay, drowning her sorrows over a coronation that was not meant to be. Yet the "paper of record"
continued to push the big lie.
Indulge in a Death Wish. Joe Biden's present lead in the polls is a levitation. These are the dangling
entrails of the panic that the national political media, which are unofficially conducting the Democratic campaign in the
unheroic absence of the putative nominee, have sown about the coronavirus and the impression, desperately promoted,
identifying Trump with the recent chaos. A public opinion climate worn down by lengthy social confinement, arrested
economic activity, and high unemployment is especially vulnerable to disgruntlement about its leaders. Given the
pandemic, the recession, and the worst rioting in America in over fifty years, Trump has done well to maintain his approval
rating in the mid-forties.
Are Getting Worse for Trump, Which Probably Means He Wins in a Landslide. A CNN poll at the beginning of the
month had Trump behind Biden by 14 and a new Fox News poll has him down by 12. My instinctive response to those numbers is:
on what planet can the drooling moron Biden be leading a presidential race by that much? That's what makes me doubt the
polls even more so than the fact that they were so spectacularly wrong in 2016.
Polls Put Democrats in a Trap of Their Own Making. Remember the heady days of June 2016, when Hillary Clinton
led Donald Trump in every one of twelve major polls — by a margin of 10 points, according to ABC and the
Washington Post? Or August 2016, after the Khan imbroglio, when Clinton was beating Trump by 7 points, according to USA
Today/Suffolk? It was hardly an outlier. [...] In 2016, I predicted that Trump could lose the popular vote by as much
as 4% and still win the Electoral College. This is because roughly 4,000,000 Democrat voters in California, New York,
and Illinois are in excess of the plurality needed to win those states. The difference between winning California by
50.0001% and winning it by 99% is meaningless in a presidential election. In fact, Trump lost the popular vote by 2.1%
in 2016 but won the Electoral College, 304 to 227.
Campaign Calls CNN's Brian Stelter 'Sexist' for Attack on Jenna Ellis. President Donald Trump's re-election
campaign accused CNN media reporter Brian Stelter of sexism on Sunday [8/14/2020] for telling campaign legal adviser Jenna
Ellis that her children and grandchildren would be ashamed of her one day. In what Mediaite called a "trainwreck"
interview on Stelter's show, Reliable Sources, the host quizzed Ellis about the campaign's threat to sue CNN over a
poll last week that showed former Vice President Joe Biden fourteen points ahead.
polls destroy media credibility. The purveyors of fake news at CNN are convinced, just as they were four years
ago, that they have this presidential election in the bag. Donald Trump is done, and Joe Biden is headed for a
landslide, just like Hillary Clinton was. At this point, they have zero credibility left. As before, CNN's
confidence is severely misplaced — and we're going to prove it. The best evidence they can present are polls
that suffer from exactly the same flaws as the ones that indicated a landslide victory for Clinton in 2016.
2020, be more skeptical than ever of polls. A recent spate of mostly bad polls for President Trump has driven a
narrative that he's on his way out. Pundits have declared his reelection in "deep trouble," and they have highlighted
polls showing him "hemorrhaging older voters." Even Republicans in swing states have raised alarms about how vulnerable Trump
is to defeat. But in 2020, as the coronavirus pandemic rips through the world, the uncertainty is so great that it's
sillier than ever to read so much into polls this far out from the election.
2020 Election Will Be a Landslide For Biden. Unless Trump Wins. Today's edition of "Fun With Polls" has
one survey showing Joe Biden winning in a landslide over Donald Trump in the November presidential election because the
economy is so bad. Oxford Economics developed a model that is predicting a "historic" Biden sweep. [...] Meanwhile,
others see a very real chance that Trump wins. Perhaps losing the popular vote, but strong enough in battleground
states to carry off a win. [...] That Oxford model is a load of malarkey, to be sure. Basing a model on past
performance by the American electorate in 2020 is borderline insane.
in Panic Mode over Latest Presidential Polls. CNN, in their dogged and unending quest to overturn the 2016
presidential election and drive President Trump from office, is in full-on campaign mode. Just as in the last
presidential election cycle, opinion polls are a campaign staple of the media and the Democrat party. Polls are not
being used as they should, to reflect public opinion, but instead to shape opinion, a form of political propaganda.
The Teflon Campaign.
Between March 11, when the coronavirus prompted the NBA to suspend its season, and May 14, some 84,000 Americans died of
coronavirus, more than 36 million lost their jobs, and Congress appropriated $3.6 trillion in new spending. It is not
foolish to suppose that these world-shaking events would affect the presidential election. On the contrary: One
would expect a dramatic swing toward either the incumbent or the challenger. But look at the polls. Not only has
there been no big shift. There has been no shift.
Poll Shows Trump Crushing Biden in Battleground States. A CNN poll of 15 crucial battleground states shows
President Trump crushing Joe Biden by seven full points, 52 to 45 percent. The poll covered the expected swing states
of Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Wisconsin. In its national poll, the fake news outlet shows Burisma Biden beating Trump 51 to
46 percent, but the presidency is not a national race, it is a race in each of the 50 states.
Polling, Cell Phone Data Shows Americans Are Going Out Again. Over the past two weeks, a slew of polling has
come out showing that Americans overwhelmingly support the coronavirus lockdown measures throughout much of the country.
A recent poll in Massachusetts had 85 percent supporting the extension of restrictions through May 18. Nationally,
according to a Forbes poll in late April, 87 percent of Americans favor continuing the lockdown. But cell
phone tracking data is telling a different story. Apple looked at changes in routing requests on its phones and found
that beginning in mid-March their users' mobility began dropping, hitting a nadir of -60 percent of the baseline in
April. By May 4, that number had jumped up to -20 percent of the baseline. That's a 40 percent
increase in travel.
The Editor says...
Actually that's a 100 percent increase. The number went from Baseline x 0.4 to Baseline x 0.8.
Prospects in November. Right now all the best polls show Trump trailing Joe Biden by significant margins.
Why is it no one seems to believe them? Past experience, no doubt: Trump in 2016 ran ahead of his polls in most
of the Republican primaries, and then again in November. True, the nationwide polls had Hillary's popular vote margin
over Trump about right, but that accuracy depended on the lumpy Democratic vote mostly in just two states —
California and New York. The state-by-state polls were mostly wrong, especially in the key swing states.
Supporters: Fear Not Those Discouraging Polls. What are we to make of the dire predictions of President
Donald Trump's political doom — that he doesn't stand a chance for reelection in November? I've read
numerous mainstream media reports gloating over polls that show presumed Democratic nominee Joe Biden surging and Trump
plummeting. I'm not one to casually dismiss polls, but I view them skeptically, especially given their poor track
record in more recent elections, and pollsters' brazen manipulation of them to sway public opinion. Don't the wildly
failed polls forecasting a Hillary Clinton victory in 2016 warrant our skepticism? Preelection polling was uniformly
wrong, but so were Election Day exit polls.
Expect Losers of Shutdown to Sit Idly by Forever. Public opinion polls are not, nor should they ever be, the
sine qua non of republican government. Public opinion is influenced by the government at least as often as it
influences the government. That is probably the case here. For weeks, public health authorities have been warning
the people that these quarantines are necessary and prudent. Without disputing their proclamations, it is hardly
controversial to say polling respondents are mainly repeating this back to the pollsters.
Joe Biden Is Cooked.
Despite polls showing that he leads President Trump in key states and in the country overall, there remains something
seriously missing and not credible in the putative presidential nomination of Joe Biden. The polls are never
accurate with Trump, and there is both a reticence by his supporters to identify themselves and some sampling errors by the
main polling organizations because of the unusually high numbers of people this president draws to the polls in his support
who are not otherwise frequent voters.
Polling Lead vs. Trump Isn't as Solid as It Looks. President Trump and Joe Biden begin the general
election campaign locked in a highly competitive contest that remains fought along the lines of the 2016 presidential
election, according to national and battleground state polls. If anyone holds the early edge, it is Mr. Biden.
He leads by an average of six points in national live-interview polls of registered voters. But the election will be
decided by voters in the battleground states, not registered voters nationwide, and there the story is not nearly so clear
or rosy for Mr. Biden.
finds Biden with 11-point national lead on Trump. Former Vice President Joe Biden leads President Trump by
11 points in a new national survey released by CNN on Thursday [4/9/2020]. The poll finds Biden with 53 percent
support against 42 percent support for Trump. That's the largest margin for any poll released this month. A
Monmouth University survey released on Thursday [4/9/2020] found Biden with a 4-point national lead. Most other recent
surveys put Biden's advantage between 3 points and 8 points.
Hired IT Firm to Rig Early CNBC, Drudge Polls to Favor Trump. In early 2015, a man who runs a small technology
company showed up at Trump Tower to collect $50,000 for having helped Michael Cohen, then Donald Trump's personal lawyer, try
to rig online polls in his boss's favor before the presidential campaign. In his Trump Organization office,
Mr. Cohen surprised the man, John Gauger, by giving him both a blue Walmart bag containing between $12,000 and $13,000
in cash and, randomly, a boxing glove that Mr. Cohen said had been worn by a Brazilian mixed-martial arts fighter, [...]
The Editor says...
Interesting, but at that point, you'll hit the WSJ pay wall. To me, it's not that interesting.
News Poll Shows Biden Defeating Trump By 9 Percent. Fox News released a new poll on Friday [3/27/2020] that
seems to have some bad news for President Donald Trump. However, there might be more to these numbers than it
appears. According to the poll, which was conducted between March 21 [and] 24 revealed that if the presidential
election were held today, former Vice President Joe Biden would defeat Trump by nine percentage points. [...] The poll revealed
that 49% of participants indicated that they would cast their votes for Biden while 40% said they would vote for Trump.
Here's what a
Sanders-Trump map could look like. With Bernie Sanders looking more and more like the potential Democratic presidential
nominee, the good people at the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia have released their first take on what the
electoral map might look like in a matchup between the senator from Vermont and President Donald Trump.
Says He Can Beat Trump Because an NBC Poll Says So. "In terms of who can beat Donald Trump, NBC did a poll yesterday," Biden said.
["]It says Joe Biden is best equipped to beat Donald Trump. That's what your poll said. It says I can beat him in those toss-up
states, too, the states we have to win.["]
the 2020 presidential campaign polls are misleading. [Scroll down] It is obvious that the vast majority
of Democrats simply want to know who the best person for that job is, but through very little fault of their own, they are
not being given the proper information with which to make that critical determination. Part of the blame goes to a
gutless and compromised news media that, for various reasons, has no self-interest in harshly vetting candidates like Bernie
Sanders (he has a cult who will be [angry] at them), Pete Buttigieg (he is gay and, therefore, it is not in the DNA of the
liberal elements of the news media to be able to criticize him unless there is no other choice), and Mike Bloomberg (he is
literally paying their salaries right now by spending millions in media advertising). But I mostly blame the pollsters
who have been remarkably unimaginative and, frankly, overly politically correct in their methods, which have provided voters
with mostly meaningless and deceiving data.
Takeaways the Mainstream Media Missed. [#1] Polls Do Not Matter Until the Last Few Weeks of an Election.
New Hampshire proves something about polling that I have been writing for years: polls do not matter until elections are
within four or fewer weeks. The average person has no idea what in the world is going on. [...] Because most people are
utterly ignorant but are ashamed to confess their ignorance to pollsters, polls are relatively meaningless until four or
fewer weeks before elections because people start to pay attention to the candidates and issues only as elections draw near,
if even then. Until that time draws near, people simply mutter what they think their friends, customers,
clients, patients, and relatives think.
flopped in the Iowa caucuses despite a strong showing in recent polling. Former Vice President Joe Biden came
in fourth place in the Iowa caucuses with about 13% of the vote, according to preliminary results released Tuesday evening,
underperforming his recent polling. Biden came in behind Sen. Bernie Sanders, former South Bend, Indiana, Mayor
Pete Buttigieg, and Sen. Elizabeth Warren. As of 5:15 p.m. on Tuesday, Sanders and Buttigieg led with 62% of
precincts reporting. The results came after an approximately 20-hour delay as a result of a malfunctioning mobile app.
The Editor says...
Something tells me 62% of the precincts reported over the phone, with a paper trail that's highly suspect, and the true
results may never be known with any certainty.
Carville: Iowa Democrat Turnout Was Terrible and What Happened to The Polling? Democrat political
strategist James Carville appears on MSNBC and plays the roll [sic] of Toto pulling back the curtain on a false
media-constructed narrative. Carville notes this was supposed to be a year of hyped democrat voter enthusiasm, but it
just isn't there. Additionally, Carville asks what [...] happened to the polling over the past two weeks?
caucuses: legitimate disaster or cover for a more nefarious plan? At this point, inquiring minds are getting
paranoid about whether the DNC is desperately trying to run away from Bernie's apparent momentum. [...] Working with CNN,
the Des Moines Register commissioned a poll in the lead-up to the Iowa caucuses. However, owing to some confusion about
whether Pete Buttigieg was among the candidate choices offered to those taking the poll, CNN and the Register decided to pull
the poll. That's the official story. The unofficial story is that the poll shows that both Bernie Sanders and
Andrew Yang polled so high that the Democrat establishment made the decision to yank the poll, lest it help those two
candidates on the day of the caucus. On the one hand, it's a great conspiracy theory, composed of imaginary dots
connected by invisible lines. On the other hand, knowing that the DNC essentially took the 2016 nomination from Bernie and
bestowed it on Hillary, and knowing that the DNC is in a blind panic about Bernie's momentum... suddenly, anything is possible.
final Iowa poll had Biden in fourth. A highly respected Iowa poll that was canceled from being released amid
integrity issues had Joe Biden in fourth place, which could have drastically altered the news cycle and voter considerations
in the days before Monday's Democratic caucuses. According to leaked results verified by FiveThirtyEight, the final
Des Moines Register/CNN/Mediacom poll of likely Democratic caucus-goers before Monday's first-in-the-nation caucuses
had Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders leading with 22%, Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren in second at 18%, former
South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg with 16%, and the former vice president in fourth with 13%.
of Famed Iowa Poll Cancelled at the last Minute After Buttigieg Campaign Complains. The final Des Moines
Register/CNN/Mediacom poll of likely Iowa Democratic caucus-goers was pulled Saturday night [2/1/2020] shortly before it was
to be released, supposedly because of a complaint that a name was left off the list of choices. As a result, the
historically accurate, 76-year-old Iowa poll will not be released before Iowa voters caucus on Monday. CNN had planned
an hour-long show to cover the results of the poll live and had to cancel at the last minute. The announcement stunned
the political world and led to widespread speculation that the real reason the poll was spiked was because they didn't like
Des Moines Register Cancel Iowa Poll After Pete Buttigieg [was] Left Out. The Des Moines Register and
CNN announced Saturday night that they would not release their crucial Iowa poll, citing an error in which one candidate's
name was left out of polling questions. Jonathan Martin of the New York Times tweeted that the candidate who was
left out was former South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg:
Moines Register, partners cancel release of Iowa Poll over respondent concerns. The Des Moines Register, CNN
and Selzer & Co. have made the decision to not release the final installment of the CNN/Des Moines Register/Mediacom poll as
planned Saturday evening. Nothing is more important to the Register and its polling partners than the integrity of the
Iowa Poll. Today, a respondent raised an issue with the way the survey was administered, which could have compromised
the results of the poll. It appears a candidate's name was omitted in at least one interview in which the respondent
was asked to name their preferred candidate.
installment of gold-standard Iowa Poll pulled after legitimacy complaint. Political junkies waiting for the
final installment of the famed Iowa Poll were left disappointed after its release was canceled. The last Des Moines
Register/CNN/Mediacom poll of likely Democratic caucusgoers before Monday's opening contest in Iowa was pulled late
Saturday after an Iowa City man complained he wasn't given former South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg as an option to a
question about his preferred candidate, according to reports. The poll's results were due to be published
simultaneously by Iowa's premier newspaper and during a live broadcast by CNN before both outlets canned their plans.
[are] Becoming More Desperate, and More Dangerous. The bigger question is, where do the Democrats go from
here? Even their own delusional polls show their candidates either losing to President Trump or ahead by low single
digits, which, as experience bears witness, means they are really losing by double digits.
Pay Little Attention to Current National General Election Polls. According to Real Clear Politics, in spite of
the economy and everything else going well in the United States of America, almost every current national poll has President
Trump trailing a hypothetical Democrat opponent. Whether Biden; Sanders; Warren; or even Buttigieg, Bloomberg, or
Klobuchar, President Trump trails them all in nearly every poll. As of this writing, the latest general election
national poll by CNN, IBD/TIPP, Emerson, Fox News, Quinnipiac, and SurveyUSA has President Trump behind almost every possible
Democrat candidate. In 32 different matchups from the six polling agencies previously mentioned, President Trump leads
in only two scenarios. The latest IBD/TIPP national poll has Trump beating Warren 47% to 46%, and the latest Emerson
poll has Trump beating Buttigieg 51% to 49%. According to these polls, even Democrats who have since dropped out of
the race were beating President Trump.
the big Schiff show finale, public support craters for impeachment -poll. Not too long ago, the press was
calling President Trump a goner. Remember this early October Fox News poll that shocked so many people? They had
it that a majority of randomly selected registered voters, 50% to 41%, were all in for impeaching and removing President
Trump. We had our doubts, but the press reported that as perfectly representative of public opinion, undoubtedly a lit
fuse to the eventual ouster of President Trump. [...] So now we've got the impeachment needle moving decisively to the other
side. Not only did the needle not move the way Noonan forecast it might move, but it moved in exactly the opposite
direction. What happened?
Massive Media Fail As Poll Of Polls Prove Trump's More Popular Than Obama. Real Clear Politics, a non-partisan
(and indispensable) site that tracks countless polls and averages them, also tracks the job approval numbers for President
Trump and former (thank heaven) President Obama in a way that allows us to see how the two presidents compare on this same
day during their respective presidencies. [...] We are now entering our fourth year of a media jihad against Trump, a hate
campaign unlike any other in modern history. Literally, billions and billions and billions of corporate dollars
are being spent by every corner of the establishment media to destroy one man, this one man: Trump. The "Very
Fine People" Hoax, the Russia Collusion Hoax, the Fish Food Hoax, the Brett Kavanaugh-Rapist Hoax, the Kurds Are Being
Exterminated Hoax — I'm forgetting a hundred more — and now we have this laughable Impeachment
Hoax. Compare that to Barry Obama, a man this same media spent billions and billions and billions of corporate dollars
to shield, to protect, to assure and reassure the public of his unique magnificence, competence, and holiness.
Endless Pursuit of Impeachment Spells Trouble for Democrats. The Democrats' desperate pursuit of impeachment is
driving key voters away — a sign of danger for Democrats going into 2020 — polling reveals.
Polls, in recent days, have indicated that the general public is growing weary of House Intelligence Committee chairman Adam
Schiff's (D-CA) endless pursuit of impeachment, with survey after survey showing opposition to impeachment growing and
support falling. The results, however, are exacerbated when key voters, such as independents, are isolated.
The myth of Mayor Pete. What is it about Mayor
Pete Buttigieg that's going to most appeal to the people of Atlanta? Is it the years he spent in consultancy on the
McKinsey payroll? Perhaps it's the large donations he's secured from a few Silicon Valley donors — because
we know how much the new left loves billionaires. [...] The mayor's recent rise can be attributed to a few factors.
There is that tech money, which he's been pouring into early primary state TV advertising. This in turn leads to an
outsized performance in the polls there — it's one of the areas where money really talks. Just ask Tom Steyer.
A St Anselm poll released Tuesday [11/19/2019] shows him with a 10-point lead over Biden and Warren in New Hampshire.
Never mind that it only surveyed 255 people and has a 6.1 percent margin of error — it's the headlines that count.
leads Trump by 6 points in 2020 election matchup. Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg leads President
Donald Trump by 6 percentage points in a hypothetical 2020 matchup, according to a new Morning Consult/Politico poll.
Forty-three percent of likely voters would back Bloomberg if the election were held today [11/10/2019], compared to 37% who
would vote for Trump. Twenty-one percent those polled, however, said they don't know or don't have an opinion.
The poll comes as Bloomberg considers jumping into the Democratic presidential primary. The billionaire is still not
sure if he'll enter the race, a source told CNBC, but he is troubled by what he sees in the Democratic field.
Another poll on the same day shows something entirely different: Michael
Bloomberg [is] more disliked than any Democratic candidate: poll. Michael Bloomberg would face a tough start to his
presidential bid — as a new poll Sunday [11/10/2019] has found him with little support and nearly a quarter of
Democratic primary voters who dislike him. Despite grabbing wall-to-wall press coverage over the past week since hints
of his possible run surfaced, Bloomberg came out as the favorite candidate for just 4-percent of Democratic primary voters,
according to the Morning Consult poll. It puts the former New York mayor in sixth place, just behind Sen. Kamala
Harris and Mayor Pete Buttigieg and clearly trailing Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Sen. Bernie Sanders, with 18- and
20-percent support respectively.
Pundits to Democratic Presidential Field: 'You're Losers!'. Over on the far left, New York magazine's Jonathan
Chait writes that the latest battleground states poll shows that Democrats are living "in a fantasy world." [...] As Chait is
forced to conclude, "if you've been relying on national polls for your picture of the race, you're probably living in la-la land."
Stuck in the Middle of a Grand Illusion. A lot of polling out there today, folks, a lot of misleading,
misrepresentative polling. It's stunning how we continue to be stuck in the middle of a grand illusion. [...] The
Mueller report shows no collusion, no obstruction, and yet they continue as though it does. Now, there's a very
interesting reason why this is the case. I'm gonna illustrate here in a minute. They believe that there is no
such thing as public opinion. I'm telling you right now they think public opinion doesn't matter. Public opinion
is what their published polls say it is. That's a big difference, folks. It is a huge difference. There is
no public opinion.
These Numbers Tell Us More Than the Polls? One of the casualties of the Democrats war on free speech is
political polls. Polls have become useless because Republicans no longer feel safe replying to a pollster, even on
on-line. Polls are purposely skewed, often by the blatant expedient of polling more Democrats, as was done in the
recent Fox impeachment poll. So, we are reduced to anecdotal evidence about where public opinion is trending. We
often hear of the culture war victories of America's new Marxist left, because they fully control our propaganda press.
Are they really winning public opinion, or is that, too, propaganda meant to discourage conservatives and suppress our
vote? Beyond the headlines, things do not look so rosy for the woke left.
Pushes Polling Propaganda. Pollsters are at it again, pushing sketchy polls, not to reflect public opinion, but
to shape it. This is called propaganda, a popular tool for dictators who want to control the information flow from an
all-powerful government to their subjects, the people. What once passed for journalism is now mostly propaganda, an
effort by major media organizations to insert themselves into the political process, to push their agenda, even if it means
throwing any pretense of journalistic principle and integrity to the wind.
Becomes A Psychodrama Of the Press. Fox News, which is generally well-disposed to the president, published a
poll last week that 51% of Americans believe the president should be impeached and removed from office. Fox's polls
aren't very accurate, though their news coverage and comment are quite professional. But this one is bunk.
Between 40% and 50% of Americans may wish there were a reason to remove Mr. Trump, or hope that he won't be reelected.
That figure is insufficient to change congressional votes on an impeachment resolution, given that about 45% of the country is
militantly pro-Trump and probably 10 million others will hold their noses and vote for his substantive performance
despite his stylistic foibles.
News Impeachment Poll Underrepresented Republicans. If the Fox News poll had been weighted to accurately reflect
party affiliation in the United States, it would have found 44.9 percent favoring impeachment, and 44.4 percent
opposing, according to analysis from the New York Post. That's still a plurality, which is arguably not great
for Trump, but it's not as significant as a majority. Many outlets jumped on the Fox News poll as proof that things
look dire for Trump. But this poll really shows not much has changed. In May of 2017, a POLITICO/Morning Consult
poll found that 43 percent of voters wanted Congress to begin impeachment proceedings. That was just a few short
months after Trump took office. Despite three years of an anti-Trump media scandalizing everything, there really hasn't
been huge movement of the needle on impeachment.
News is Joining the Fake News Pollsters. [Scroll down] As the impeachment scheme falls apart, with no
actual wrongdoing by the President, no bribes or extortion, no pay-to-play, no collusion, or anything else which Trump is
accused of, but which Joe Biden actually did, the media has gone into overdrive to push the "everyone hates Trump and wants
him thrown from office" mantra. Who needs high crimes or misdemeanors if a majority of America wants Trump removed from
office? Impeachment by opinion poll. Impeachment is being boosted and promoted by the usual Democrat media
outlets such as CNN, MSNBC, the NY Times, and the Washington Post, but Fox News, so-called "fair and balanced," has
been considered more reasoned than the rest of the Trump-loathing media. At least until Rupert Murdoch's two sons got
more involved in the news business, tilting Fox News leftward.
York Post: Fox News 'Misrepresented' Impeachment Poll. The New York Post released an analysis
Saturday [10/12/2019], which found Fox News had "mispresented" their poll, suggesting a majority of Americans supported
impeachment of President Donald Trump. Fox News released a poll this week which found that 51 percent of registered
voters want President Trump impeached and removed from office, while 4 percent want Trump impeached but want him to stay in
office, and 40 percent of voters oppose impeachment. The Fox News poll found that supposedly showed a double-digit
increase in the number of voters who wanted Trump impeached and removed from office.
News pollster Braun Research misrepresented impeachment poll: analysis. The poll released last week by Fox News
that claimed most Americans favor the impeachment of President Trump underrepresented Republican and independent voters, The
[New York] Post has found. The poll said 51% of voters were in favor of Trump's impeachment and removal from office,
while 40% did not want him impeached. Princeton, New Jersey, pollster Braun Research, which conducted the survey, noted
48% of its respondents were Democrats. But the actual breakdown of party-affiliation is 31% Democrat, 29% Republican
and 38% independent, according to Gallup.
that Fox News poll claiming 51% of voters want Trump out. [Scroll down] It's undoubtedly a lot of
randomly selected registered voters, even if it's not 51%, and that's likely a reflection of the wall-to-wall negative media
coverage President Trump has gotten over this impeachment whistleblower issue, which I've seen on television news broadcasts.
[...] The bad thing with this is that it will embolden Democrats to keep pressing forward to remove President Trump from
office, even on just obstruction grounds since they aren't doing any "impeachment inquiry" honestly or fairly to all
sides. They've gagged Republicans from asking questions, and their refusal to hold a real impeachment inquiry is
nothing more than a bid to keep subpoena powers from Republicans. Is any of that known to voters? Not most Fox
poll voters. Worse still, the Drudge Report, for inexplicable reasons, is featuring almost exclusively negative Trump
news these days, along with the NeverTrumps at Fox News.
makes Fox News's 'Trump impeachment' poll totally unrealiable. Polling in modern America has degenerated into a
vehicle to create news and headlines and to shape public opinion on an issue or an individual. Over the past few days,
the lead on every cable news channel and the headline in virtually all newspapers is Fox News claiming in its exclusive poll
that 51% of Americans now favor impeachment and removal of President Trump. How did the Fox polling unit come up with
this number? The Fox news polling companies interviewed 1,003 registered voters, ostensibly throughout the length and
breadth of the United States. Many polling companies use either all adult Americans (254 million) or registered voters
(158 million in 2016) as their universe for polling. Obviously, the greater the number of potential people to contact
and question, the easier a poll is to complete and to skew a result. In reality, what matters is who votes in an election.
Poll: More Americans Trust Trump Administration Than Congress, The Media. A new NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist
Poll released Thursday [10/10/2019] shows that more Americans trust the Trump administration than the media and Congress as a
whole. "The poll of 1,123 Americans was conducted with live telephone Oct. 3 through Oct. 8, 2019," according to NPR
and asked a series of questions related to President Donald J. Trump's presidency. When asked, "How much do you trust
Congress: A great deal, a good amount, not very much, not at all?" 66 percent of Americans said they trust Congress
"not very much/not at all." 31 percent said they trusted Congress a "great deal/a good amount." When asked the same
question regarding trust about the media, 69 percent said they trusted our news "not very much/not at all."
29 percent of Americans said they trusted the media.
Shows Partisan Animosity Has Deepened Since 2016. A 64% majority of Republican respondents felt that Democrats
are more closed-minded than other Americans. Sixty-three percent said Democrats are unpatriotic, and 55% said they are
immoral. Small numbers of Republicans said Democrats are lazy and unintelligent — 46% and 36%,
respectively. On the other side, 75% of Democratic respondents said that Republicans are closed-minded.
Forty-seven percent said members of the GOP are immoral, 38% said Republicans are unintelligent, 23% said they are
unpatriotic, and 20% said they are lazy.
on impeachment push: It's a political process 'masquerading' as a legal one. The impeachment inquiry is a
"political process kind of masquerading as a legal one," former Assistant U.S. Attorney Andy McCarthy said Thursday
[10/10/2019]. According to a Fox News Poll released Wednesday, just over half of voters want President Trump impeached and
removed from office. A new high of 51 percent wants Trump impeached and removed from office, another 4 percent
want him impeached but not removed, and 40 percent oppose impeachment altogether. In July, 42 percent favored
impeachment and removal, while five percent said impeach but don't remove him, and 45 percent opposed impeachment.
voters now favor Trump over Democratic front-runners: Poll. Independent voters are warming up to
President Trump, says a new survey which finds that Mr. Trump is now besting Democratic front-runners in a theoretical
matchup. "A new IBD-TIPP poll shows President Trump has gained significant ground with independent voters in head-to-head
matchups with the Democrat Party frontrunners for president," wrote Matt Margolis, a contributor to PJ Media. He cited
the factors. Former Vice President Joseph R. Biden, for instance, leads Mr. Trump by just one percentage point
among independents, down from Mr. Biden's 18 percentage point lead in September. Against Sen. Elizabeth Warren,
49% of independents backed Mr. Trump, while 43% favored the Massachusetts Democrat.
Invades the Democratic Party. President Trump's path to reelection goes through the Democratic Party.
Goal No. 1 is to get Democrats to eliminate his greatest threat: Joe Biden. [...] The general election polls are what
keep him up at night. They show the former vice president beating Trump like a drum. The most recent national Fox
News poll puts Biden ahead of Trump by 14 points. The ABC News/Washington Post poll gives him a 15-point lead.
The Editor says...
President Trump will almost certainly be re-elected. There is no question that he can beat any candidate announced
thus far. In my opinion, the polls cited in this article are in error.
deeper dive into one poll shows what Americans really think about impeachment. The latest CBS News poll
headlined the findings that "Majority of Americans favor an impeachment inquiry into President Trump," 55 percent to
45 percent. But what if there's more than meets the eye? Like many polls, there is plenty of fodder within
the CBS News poll results to support either side. The trick is who does the reporting and which points they select to
highlight. What if it turns out there are many other headlines — and statistics — that could have
been chosen from the same poll, ones that give an entirely different take on the situation? Here's one of them:
"Majority of Americans in Democrat-heavy poll favor an impeachment inquiry into President Trump." Wouldn't most
Americans looking for unbiased information want the context that the poll interviewed more Democrats than Republicans?
Polling Propaganda. According to the latest presidential opinion polls, the 2020 presidential election is
over. Newsweek is giddy, reporting several days ago, "The latest Fox News poll about the 2020 election shows President
Donald Trump losing to every Democratic frontrunner including Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren." Propaganda,
used extensively in the past by communists and Nazis, is information put out by governments, or their media allies, to push an
agenda and influence people rather than to inform them. [...] The Fox News poll noted above was not actually conducted by Fox,
but instead commissioned to Beacon Research and Shaw and Company Research. Calling it a "Fox News Poll" is part of the
propaganda, meaning that if Trump's favorite news network thinks his electoral prospects are nil, then it must be really bad
for Trump and his supporters.
Poll: Trump Narrowly Leads Top Democrat Candidates in General Election Matchup. A Florida Atlantic University
poll released Wednesday [9/18/2019] shows President Trump narrowly leading his potential Democrat challengers in a hypothetical 2020
general election matchup. The poll — conducted September 12-15 among 934 registered voters in Florida —
showed the president narrowly leading his top Democrat challengers in a general election matchup in the Sunshine State.
The Editor says...
Depending on the sample, the race might be closer in Florida, especially south of 29° North, than elsewhere in the country; however,
I doubt if the leading Democrat candidate (whoever it is next year) has a serious chance of defeating President Trump.
Why Polls Now?
Why are we so beset with polls so long before an election? An election whose candidates are still unknown? Just
to be clear, these are not opinion polls, nor election polls; they are variants of push polls. These polls are used not
to reflect public opinion, but to try to shape opinion or grow an audience.
News, Fake Polls — CNN Edition. It's been a tough few weeks for CNN. Who knew pushing fake news
could be so challenging? [...] CNN's story of the week is, "6 in 10 say Trump does not deserve a second term." Well, that
settles it. If CNN says so, it must be true.
Loesch Explains How Media Manipulates Polling On Firearms. Gun expert Dana Loesch dissected a new ABC News/Washington Post
poll on gun control on Monday [9/9/2019] and explained why polling on the issue is oftentimes misleading. [...] Loesch began by highlighting
problems with the following question that was asked: "Would you support or oppose a nationwide ban on high-capacity ammunition clips,
meaning those containing more than 10 bullets?" "This is one question," Loesch tweeted. "First of all, the terminology is
incorrect (this matters for a couple reasons) and who determined over 10 rounds means 'high-capacity?' In some, that isn't even
standard, it's below standard."
Pollsters Learned Nothing since the Last Election? While the moniker "fake news" is typically reserved for
cable news and some of the more prominent newspapers in America, the term could also be applied to presidential polls.
How many pollsters predicted Hillary Clinton would win the 2016 election by a landslide up to and including the day of the
actual election? The "paper of record," the New York Times, told readers on election day, Nov. 8, 2016, that
Hillary Clinton had an 85 percent chance of winning the election.
Joe Biden won't win. Joe Biden
has led Democratic polls since day one, holding the kind of consistent lead within his party that Donald Trump held heading
into the 2016 primaries. The numbers say he will be the nominee. They also say he will beat Trump. They're
wrong: you should still bet against Biden getting the nomination or getting into the White House.
presidential polls spark new round of anxieties. Trying to figure out the state of the Democratic presidential
race? Get in line. Public opinion surveys have varied by the day, particularly in the early voting states of Iowa
and New Hampshire, where some candidates can point to individual polls to argue they are building momentum. Former Vice
President Joe Biden has held a relatively steady lead in national polls, though an Economist-YouGov poll this week found him
holding just a 1 point lead over Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.).
Rely on Phony Impeachment Polling. [Scroll down] In the Fox News poll, those surveyed were 46 percent Democrat
and only 40 percent Republican, a 6 point Democrat oversampling. [...] Interestingly, when asked if Trump should be impeached
but not removed from office, only 9 percent favor this approach while 77 percent believe he should not be impeached at all.
This is quite a disconnect suggesting that those surveyed may not understand the Constitutional process for impeachment and conviction.
How many low information voters believe that if Trump is impeached, Hillary Clinton automatically becomes president?
2016, pollsters have no clue what'll happen in 2020 — but bookies do. When you want to know who's
going to win the next presidential election, don't read the mainstream newspapers or tune in to the cable networks. And
forget the pollsters — they don't know diddly. Just check in with the bookies. "Donald Trump is still
favored to win the 2020 Election with -120 average odds," Sports Betting Dime wrote last week. That means you'd have to
bet $120 just to win $100. Them's some pretty good odds that Trump'll repeat.
Internal Poll of Swing Voters Is Leaked and the Results Are Brutal. Some Democrat strategist is going to wake up
in a cold sweat later tonight after seeing this. The Democratic Party conducted an internal poll of swing voters, including
their feelings on the "squad" and socialism. The result are absolutely brutal when juxtaposed with the stated positions of
those running in the 2020 Democratic primary race. The poll was leaked to Axios and here are some of the results. [...]
The Editor says...
Being a troublemaker is never a resumé enhancement, except in politics.
Shocker: Trump Ties With 'Unnamed Socialist'. The headline out of the recent Washington Post/ABC News
poll was that President Trump's approval ratings had hit an all-time high. [...] If it weren't for the relentlessly negative
coverage he gets in the press or the constant attacks by politicians, pundits and celebrities, Trump's approval number would
probably be 10 points higher.
Wishful thinking on the part of ABC News: Trump
reaches career-high approval, yet faces a range of re-election risks: Poll. Bolstered by a strong
economy, Donald Trump reached the highest job approval rating of his career in the latest ABC News/Washington Post poll and
runs competitively for re-election against four of five possible Democratic contenders. Yet he remains broadly
unpopular across personal and professional measures, marking his vulnerabilities in the 2020 election.
Who Really Believes
Biden Can Beat Trump? According to a new Washington Post-ABC poll, however, if the 2020 election were
held today, Biden would beat President Trump by 10 points. If this inspires skepticism, it won't be ameliorated by the
finding in the same survey that Trump's approval rating is at the highest point of his presidency. The new poll found
that 47 percent of registered voters say they approve of Trump compared to 42 percent in April. Meanwhile,
Biden's lead among the contenders for the Democratic presidential nomination is dwindling.
Polls Show Trump Lagging Behind Biden And Everyone Else, But The Betting Market Tells A Whole Other Story.
Polls mean nothing, and we all know then-candidate Donald Trump was down big-time in almost every one back in 2016 for, well,
pretty much the entire cycle until the actual election results proved the polls to be a giant sack of you know what. [...]
Even so, wouldn't it be great to hear a little good news? Well, I've got some - not from polls, but from political
betting aggregator website US-Bookies.com. The site, which uses millions of betting dollars worldwide to provide market
trends, also specializes in U.S. politics and who wagerers think will win at any given time. Political betting is
currently illegal in the U.S., but is alive and well in other markets. In fact, US-Bookies.com predicted via press
release Tuesday [6/25/2019] that over $100 million will be spent in the 2020 race, "making it the biggest non-sports
betting event of all time."
Mass of Support. Something very strange is going on with our news media, as it covers the state of the 2020
campaign. Donald Trump, according to the big news outlets (CNN, the New York Times, ABC, the Washington
Post, and their brethren), is on the ropes. The polls from these same news outlets show him losing by catastrophic
margins to virtually every Democratic candidate. Even Senator Cory Booker (D-N.J.), who is polling at 2 percent among
Democrats, would defeat Trump in every key state. Joe Biden — according to the polls and the
pundits — would crush Trump even in the reddest of the red states. Forget the Midwest — Biden is
so wildly popular, even Texas is now out of reach for the GOP. Quinnipiac says Biden will squash Trump like a bug in
Florida — 50 percent to 41 percent. In fact, another Quinnipiac poll reports a tsunami of Bidenophilia
is sweeping the nation from coast to coast. "Joe Biden is ahead by landslide proportions," says Quinnipiac.
The Editor says...
The news media thrive on neck-and-neck horse races, where the lead changes every hour, depending on who's speaking.
An impending landslide doesn't compel you to tune in every day to learn the latest details. Sensationalism sells
and the Latest Polls: Summertime Blues or More Fake News? Recent polls show President Donald Trump in big
trouble, likely to lose in a landslide to many of the 20-plus Democrat contenders. Once again, the media tell their
dwindling audience how "the walls are closing in" on Trump and how no one likes him. Should Trump-supporters
be worried? Or is this just the latest edition of the Fake News Gazette, courtesy of the Trump-loathing media?
'Orlando Poll' Makes Stale Bread Out of Of Fox Poll. Some 20,000 patriots cheered the president on at the packed-house
Amway Center [6/18/2019]. [...] The Fox News poll, released within a few days before Trump's official re-election launch, and which
may have intended to leave the masses reeling in shock with the 'news' that Trump was trailing behind Democrat primary contender Joe
Biden and raving socialist Senator Bernie Sanders by 10 and 9 points respectively, is looking pretty stale after Orlando.
of the Hype: [the] Media's early-poll fascination [is] about ratings, revenue, not sound reporting. It's
campaign season and the Democrats are scrambling for traction, so guess what, America — make way for the weekly,
daily, hourly horse race of polls. That, and the accompanying snarky pundit swipes at this current president. And
not just any polls. Polls specifically showing Democrats, the favored class of mainstream media types everywhere, are
firmly in the lead. Let the eye-rolling begin. Let's not pretend for even a moment these surveys mean anything.
Fake Polls Are Back Again.
Since he launched his presidential campaign in 2015, Donald Trump has masterfully labeled the media as "fake news" for their
ongoing liberal bias and censorship of conservatives. One method the "fake news" media uses to ridicule President Trump
is to champion supposedly independent polls that show his low approval rating. The latest tactic is to promote polls
that indicate the President will lose in a "landslide" to former Vice President Joe Biden in the 2020 election. This
week several new polls were heavily hyped by the Trump-hating media. A new Quinnipiac University poll boasts nothing
but good news for the top Democratic presidential contenders. In individual matchups against President Trump, all of
them are leading.
56% of Americans think Arabic numerals shouldn't be taught in schools. A Pittsburgh-based polling company is
making waves after its CEO tweeted the results for a survey question that showed 56% of Americans believe Arabic numerals
shouldn't be taught in schools. Civic Science CEO John Dick tweeted a screengrab of results for a question included in
the poll, which revealed that only 29% of Americans believe Arabic numerals should be taught to children.
The Editor says...
This poll is obviously an attempt to prove (or provoke) anti-Arabic prejudice.
Australian Politics, Upside-Down.
The Liberal/National Party's election victory in Australia on May 18 was the latest electoral result to shock the punditry.
Like Brexit and Donald Trump, it was a conservative victory that few expected. Voters in Queensland, Australia's agricultural
and industrial power center, turned to the LNP in support of the proposed Carmichael coal mine that would provide up to
5,000 jobs to the local economy — but which the Labor Party and Green Party opposed. Labor's supposedly
unlosable "climate change election" proved a debacle, as exit polls predicting that the party would gain up to 18 seats
turned out to be wildly inaccurate.
did the federal election polls get it so wrong? [Scroll down] Tasmanian electoral analyst Kevin Bonham
also described the events as a "massive polling failure", writing that it was looking like a "mirror image of the expected
result". As of Sunday [5/19/2019], he told SBS News that there seemed to be a three percent error across every poll in
the past two weeks, which is far outside the usual margin for error. "It's like one poll can be three percent out and
that's what you would sort of expect now and then by random chance. But all the polls being out by that amount in the
same direction and getting all the same results is something that absolutely cannot happen by random chance," he said.
polls blindsided nation, but 'Shorten knew all along'. As Scott Morrison charged to victory yesterday,
seemingly defying all odds, Australians were left scratching their heads about how the polls could have got it so
wrong. In the past two years leading up to last night's election, the Coalition did not win a single Newspoll.
Win Shock Victory in Australia, NYT Laments Climate Alarmist Los. On Saturday [5/18/2019], the conservative
party — the Liberal/National coalition — held on to its majority in Australia's parliament, even
picking up a few seats and stunning observers who had predicted a Labor Party victory. In fact, The New York
Times ran a lament that the climate alarmists lost their election. [...] Prime Minister Scott Morrison called his
coalition's victry a "miracle," since polls had predicted a Labor victory.
What the Dems Can Learn
From Down Under. You may have, for various social reasons, told some pollster that the "Save the Earth" party
has your support. But it's a lot easier to focus on the environment if one can count on a steady income.
Consequently, in the end, you'll vote for the "Paycheck Party." This shouldn't require enormous prescience to predict,
yet it consistently surprises the pollsters. The latest election in which they managed to miss the blindingly obvious
just took place Down Under between the Labor Party and the conservative Liberal-National coalition.
votes 2019: Shock! Climate action bombs. Pollsters crash. Skeptics Win. Against all the polls, the
money, advertising, and the non-stop media coverage, against all expectations and the betting agencies — the Extreme
Climate Fix was a flop. The Labor Plan to cut Australian emissions by 45% percent [sic] is now gone — per capita
this would have been a world record sacrifice in a country already increasing their renewable energy faster than any other.
Major betting agency Sportsbet were so sure Labor would win they paid out $1.3 million on bets two days early. [...] If Labor
had won, they would be crowing right now about how it proved the people wanted action. [...] Labor was tipped to win decisively in
every poll. Even in the exit polls. So thousands of people told pollsters one thing, then they voted the other way,
and hid that again on the way out the polling door. This was not just the abject failure of climate change as a vote winner,
it was also a crashing fail for the pollsters.
Conservatives Win in Australia ("Unexpectedly!").
Another national election where polls favored the left-wing party but the right-wing party won, this time in Australia. [...]
How badly were the polls off? "The polls — 56 consecutive weeks of them — pointed to a win for
Labor and Bill Shorten."
Truths, Inconvenient Outcomes. The Liberal Australian government pulls out a surprise win Down Under! [...] I
understand that Labor teamed up with the Green Weenie contingent and made global warming their main focus. All the
polls predicting Labor's win might suggests that there was a whole lot of virtue signaling going on for benefit of the
pollsters but the peeps just aren't really buying it.
social media poll finds more users want Supreme Court justices like Kavanaugh than Ginsburg. A Democratic
Senatorial Campaign Committee Twitter poll asking what type of Supreme Court justices social media users would like to have
on the bench apparently backfired when 71 percent of respondents selected "justices like Brett Kavanaugh" compared to just
29 percent who chose "justices like Ruth Bader Ginsburg." The poll, which is not scientific and open to anyone with a
Twitter account, was posted on May 3 and stated it had two more days before it closed. However, by Sunday afternoon
[5/5/2019], the tweet had vanished.
Those Biden/Trump Polls Are Meaningless. [A Drudge Report] headline links to a Morning Consult story that found
Biden with a 42 percent to 34 percent lead over President Trump in a hypothetical matchup. "Along with his advantage
over Trump, Biden has held a consistent lead in Morning Consult's weekly tracking among likely Democratic primary voters," the report
says. But the only thing shocking about this poll is that anyone would put any stock in such polls so early in the race.
Just ask President John Glenn. In May 1983, a Gallup poll came out showing that then-Sen. John Glenn would do better in a
matchup against President Reagan, with a far wider margin than the Biden/Trump split. As the New York Times reported on May 19
of that year, the survey "found that Senator Glenn led Mr. Reagan 54 percent to 37 percent."
The end of polls?
Like everything the internet touches, and not always for the better, polling seems to be going the way of the buggy whip. [...] That's
likely to have implications for coming elections if there is no such thing as reliable polls anymore. And it's a great shame for
reputable polling companies such as Pew Research, which often brings to light interesting and unexpected information to the public
fore based on its thorough polling.
the Democrats' sole hope to beat Trump in 2020, says Iowa poll. Former Vice President Joe Biden is the only
potential presidential candidate who could beat President Trump in next year's general election, according to a new poll of
Iowa voters. In a direct match-up with Trump, Biden would prevail in 2020 with 51 percent of the vote to the president's
49 percent, Emerson College found in a survey released on Saturday. Other contenders eyeing the Democratic nomination,
including Sens. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and Kamala Harris, D-Calif., as well as former
Rep. Beto O'Rourke, D-Texas, earned enough support to fall within the research's margin of error.
Conservative Majority and Polls. Every single major poll in the last fifty years has shown that conservatives
outnumber liberals. [...] Indeed, if Republicans won those states and congressional districts in which conservatives
outnumbered Democrats, they would have a clear and solid majority in Congress and easy presidential victories.
Republicans ought to embrace this and make each race one of conservatives against liberals — but Republicans shy
away from this and are encouraged to do so by conservatives who simply do not believe that they are the ideological majority
in America. What makes this even more bizarre is that the most prestigious polling organization, Gallup, goes to
extraordinary lengths to hide conservative strength.
that's never been wrong since 1946 signals GOP keeps House. Half of Americans believe that Republicans will
maintain control of the House in the midterm elections Tuesday, according to Gallup's final poll. The result of that
question has lined up with the actual election outcome every time Gallup has asked it since 1946. Fifty percent of
Americans believe Republicans will stay in power in the House, while 44 percent believe Democrats will take control.
Midterm Myopia? Pollsters
On Trial. With the harrowing vision of their disastrous performance in 2016 still fresh in their heads,
pollsters far and wide have to be feeling mighty skittish as midterm elections beckon just hours from now. There was
seemingly little introspection among the polling class as to how things could have gone so terribly wrong in their
near-unanimous proclamation that Hillary Clinton was a shoo-in in the most recent national election. But whether they
acknowledge it or not, their outdated and myopic view of national politics is now threatened as never before. Only
Rasmussen and the much-maligned LA Times tracking poll detected the Trump wave and nailed the outcome.
Last Look at the Old Polls While the New Ones Are All Over the Place. The polls going into Tuesday are all
over the place. Some are obvious and clear: Pocahontas will win in the tribal lands of Massachusetts,
Gillibrand will win in New York, Hutchinson in Arkansas, Bernie in Vermont, McMaster in South Carolina. But lots of key
races really are hard to gauge.
News Poll Has Ominous News For Democrats. Despite the headlines about an eight-point advantage for Democrats in
the generic congressional ballot, the detailed results of today's Washington Post/ABC News poll should make most Democratic
Party leaders and their billionaire benefactors sweat. First, the eight-point gap represents a five-point drop from the
same poll just three weeks ago, when Democrats had a 13-point advantage. (Like most polls, the sample favors Democrats by six
points among registered voters.) But even more ominous for Democrats is how specific voting blocs responded. If
Democrats are going to win control of the House, they need to pull votes from independent women and women in the suburbs, and
support for the generic Democratic congressional candidate has dropped significantly among these two groups.
the Polls Say About a Blue Wave? Since it's now clear that Democrats may not only fail to take control of the
U.S. Senate, they actually could lose seats, all eyes are focused on the battle for the House of Representatives.
The political fortunes for congressional Republican candidates are the reverse of those with which their Senate counterparts
are blessed. In the Senate, Democrats are defending nearly two-dozen incumbent senators, many in states that Donald
Trump won in 2016; if Republicans run the table, the GOP could get very close to a filibuster-proof Senate.
Trump Approval Rating Much Higher Than Media Wants You To Believe. It's another fake news moment by the Establishment
Media. They know it. You know it. Certainly, the Trump White House knows it. Remember all of those polls in
2016 declaring Hillary Clinton the winner? They were repeatedly slanted, skewed, a sham of an attempt to convince Trump
supporters to stay home and assure Clinton voters of certain victory.
Real Job Approval Could Be as High as 60 Percent. There are at least eight ways in which poll numbers are
likely exaggerated against Trump — and thus Republicans in general: [#1] Pollsters are asking the wrong
question. Every polling firm aside from Rasmussen appears to ask this exact question: "Do you approve of the way
Donald Trump is handling his job as President?" Clearly, "handling" is a loaded term in the context of Trump: there
are millions of Americans who don't care for his "handling" of things — which largely speaks to demeanor and
style — but are at the same time satisfied with his actual job performance and results. [...] [#2] Many firms
produce consistently negative results, outside the norm, suggesting bias or a flawed approach. [...] [#3] Corporate media
ignore Trump's successes and obsesses over issues that can be used to paint him in a bad light. [...] [#4] Many polling firms
sample the wrong people — registered voters or all adults. The only valid sample is likely voters. Those
who stay home on election day aren't part of the election results. [...]
Emerges In the Trump Presidency. It's a paradox of the Trump presidency going into the midterm elections.
The economy is strong by conventional indicators — a 4.2% growth rate in real gross domestic product for the
second quarter of 2018, according to the Commerce Department, and a 3.9% unemployment rate, according to the Labor
Department. The stock market has racked up impressive gains, with the Standard and Poor's 500 Index of large U.S.
stocks up about 36% since Election Day 2016. America is not mired in any high-profile military conflict generating
televised casualties. President Trump has no Iraq War, no Vietnam. [...] Yet surveys show Mr. Trump's job approval
ratings and his favorability ratings underwater. Polls find that a majority of Americans think the country is on the
The Editor says...
Most of the noise is coming from the Democratic Party, not the White House. The Democrats can't stand to see Donald Trump succeed.
Democrats Trust Midterm Polling? If midterm election polls increasingly show that Democrats are poised to
regain control of the House, then why are liberals in panic mode? What do they know that we don't — or that
they don't want us to? The highly touted opinion poll analyst, FiveThirtyEight, released an election update video
reporting that Democrats have an 82 percent chance of winning a majority of the House in November. The narrator
breathlessly reveals that this is the first time their forecast has given the Democrats more than an 80 percent of winning
the House since the launch of the model. Yet an MSNBC panel was apoplectic over President Donald Trump's approval
rating, which remained constant despite an avalanche of negative news stories concerning legal developments on Paul Manafort
and Michael Cohen.
System's Not Working' Is Liberal Speak For 'We're Not Getting What We Want'. CNN released a new poll this week
that alleges only 38 percent of Americans support the confirmation of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court, while 39
percent do not. It was the lowest net approval of any Supreme Court nominee since Harriet Miers. [...] Kavanaugh is
down by a single point in a CNN poll in a nation where more than half the people can't even name a single Supreme Court
justice. Never mind either that 2016 was the most SCOTUS-centric election we've had in modern times. The GOP's
presidential candidate provided a list of names then promised to nominate those people if he became president.
Media's Latest Poll Dance. CNN and MSNBC are currently at Category 4 hurricane strength against President
Trump. Expect to see this ratchet up to Category 5 in the upcoming weeks before the midterms. Ninety percent
of Trump's media coverage is negative. This will increase to approach 100 percent if Mueller can't find or fabricate the
smoking gun that will send The Donald slinking back to Trump Tower. Since Stormy Daniels's pole dances haven't damaged
President Trump, big media are using their own "poll dance," specifically opinion polls, to create the narrative that no one
likes the president. They hope to dispirit Trump voters, damping the enthusiasm of November 2016, to pick off enough
House seats to shift House control to Nancy Pelosi and Maxine Waters.
How To Lie With Polls: Texas Senate Race Edition.
Like Wendy Davis was in 2014, O'Rourke is the Texas poster-child for national Democrats. [...] A few weeks ago, a new Lyceum
Poll showed O'Rourke within two points of Cruz. The first thing to check with a Lyceum Poll is how badly they skewed
the sample. That didn't take long: They sampled equal numbers of Republicans and Democrats, because evidently
their samples are from 1994, they last time a top-of-the-ticket Democrat was within 10% of the vote total of the
Republican. Now this week we have a Marist poll that shows O'Rourke within four points of Cruz. I'd like to tell
you what level of skewing went into the Marist poll crosstabs, only I can't find any. If that's the complete list of
questions, they don't appear to have asked party affiliation, so there's no way to know just how skewed the smallish
(759) sample of registered voters is.
Rewrites History: The Polls Weren't Wrong in 2016. CBS attempted to rewrite history on Monday with
This Morning co-host Norah O'Donnell and network Director of Elections Anthony Salvanto declaring that the polls in
2016 weren't wrong. That might be a surprise to anyone who trusted the numbers in Wisconsin, Michigan and
Pennsylvania. Helping Salvanto promote his new book on polling, O'Donnell wondered: "People said that proved that
the polls were wrong. But were they?" "No," he declared. O'Donnell cheered the revisionist history:
"Yes, thank you! Anthony, explain to everybody!" Using the benefit of hindsight, Salvanto lectured: "All the
signs were there."
Polls and history
continue to point to a Ted Cruz victory in Texas. Many liberals have made it a cause célèbre to try
to defeat Cruz. Indeed, the attention paid to the Texas Senate race has been greater than for other more competitive
races such as Tennessee, where Democrat Phil Bredesen has consistently led in polls against Republican Marsha Blackburn.
Yet the polling has continued to suggest that Cruz is ahead. Just how much of a favorite is Cruz?
The Polls Are
Crazy. [T]he Washington Times cites the NBC/Wall St. Journal poll for the proposition that Americans
increasingly see Democrats as extreme: [...] That means voters are likely to swing to the GOP in the midterms, right?
Not so fast. Rasmussen, hardly a left-wing bastion, finds Democrats pulling ahead on the generic Congressional ballot,
now leading by seven points. And those results are pretty typical.
Reasons Why Barack Obama Is the Worst President in History. By now you've probably heard of polls that say
Americans believe that "Donald Trump is the worst president in history" or that presidential scholars have ranked Trump "dead
last." I can tell you right now to ignore the polls and the so-called experts. While it may be too early to
properly gauge presidential rankings for recent presidents, I am confident that history will ultimately judge Barack Obama as
the worst president our nation has ever seen.
Hours Later, Media Still Keeps Dems' Total Collapse in Reuters Poll a Secret. On Monday [5/21/2018], Reuters/Ipsos
announced that the Democratic Party's strong lead on the generic ballot question, which had remained stable for most of 2018,
had rapidly collapsed over the prior week. The #BlueWave narrative — the media's all-but-concluded assumption
that Democrats would retake the House of Representatives from the GOP in November — has largely been based on the
state of the generic ballot poll. So you might assume the media tasked with covering the 2018 midterm elections would
immediately react to a sudden shift in the most important metric available for predicting the most important outcome of those elections.
AP to offer election voter survey
to replace exit polls. The Associated Press said Tuesday [5/15/2018] that it will begin conducting an elaborate
election voter survey designed to replace the traditional in-person exit poll, which has been criticized in recent years for
inaccuracy and failing to keep up with changes in how Americans vote.
Hmmm... Who was the President for most of the last 11 years? Poll:
Optimism in Direction of Country Hits 11-Year High Under Trump. A poll released by the far-left CNN shows that
optimism about the direction of the country under President Trump has hit an 11-year high of 57 percent. The last time
this same poll registered a number that high was in January 2007. This includes 40 percent of Democrats, which is a leap of
15 points from just last month. Only 40 percent say things are going badly. Also of note is that CNN polled a
random sample of adults. Polls that screen for registered or likely voters generally produce a more favorable result for
Trump. This poll is a good example. While Trump's job approval rating sits at 41 percent with all adults, when
CNN's polling firm (SSRS) screened for registered voters, the president's job approval rating jumped to 44 percent.
2016 election was far from a fluke. America's political experts got it wrong in 2016 — not because
they took too few polls, but because they made the false assumption that American elections are immune to societal change.
in Support for Trump Causes Pollster to Reject [His] Own Poll. A poll shows that President Donald Trump's
approval rating has spiked since April 27 — prompting the Reuters/Ipsos polling team to quarantine their data.
"Every series of polls has the occasional outlier and in our opinion this is one," the pollster announced. "So, while we
are reporting the findings in the interest of transparency, we will not be announcing the start of a new trend until we have
more data to validate this pattern."
Make a note of this announcement, and check back in a year. CNN
poll: President Trump will lose in 2020, majority of Americans say. More than half of Americans think
President Trump is doomed in his 2020 re-election bid, according to a new CNN poll released Thursday [3/29/2018].
Per the poll, 54% said said they think Trump will lose in 2020. Comparably, 40% expect him to win.
using phony polls to force narrative of Trump failure. [Scroll down] This is reminiscent of opinion polls during the presidential
campaign. In mid 2016, I wrote about an ABC News poll gleefully proclaiming a 12 point lead for Clinton over Trump. This survey
oversampled Democrats by 12 points, accounting for the poll result. The reality was a dead heat at that time. This current poll
is no different, inaccurately reflecting public sentiment, instead advancing the left-wing media agenda that Trump is unpopular, that Americans
regret electing him. Wishful thinking on their part.
of Credibility In Mainstream Press Puts Burden on Readers. Take, for example, the New York Times news article
reporting on President Trump's decision to hire Lawrence Kudlow as chairman of the National Economic Council. It devoted
three paragraphs to a poll that "found support dipping slightly for Mr. Trump's signature tax law: 49 percent
of respondents approved of the bill, down from 51 percent in February." Given that the poll's margin of sampling error was
1.5%, the idea that a two percentage point move either way is newsworthy is questionable. If the poll had moved two
percentage points in the other direction and President Trump tweeted triumphantly about it, you can bet that Times
"fact-checkers" would have been all over his case about being statistically illiterate.
step back from Democrat 'blue wave' predictions. The national media are scaling back their prediction for a
Democratic "blue wave" in the 2018 midterms, in light of a new poll that shows some Democrats are vulnerable and a healthy
GOP turnout in Texas this week. Fueled in part by Republican-backed tax cuts that increased the paychecks for most
people, Republicans and President Trump have seen their own poll numbers rise, and what was previously viewed as a coming
reckoning by Democrats has stalled. The website Axios on Thursday [3/8/2018] published a poll that showed "big warning
signs for Senate Democrats." It noted that in 10 states where Democrats are defending Senate seats, a Republican opponent
polls either ahead or close to the Democrat in five of those states (though in most of the races, the GOP has not chosen its
nominee yet). The poll also showed that in most states, Trump's approval rating is 50 percent or higher, which
could be a sign that he will not have a negative impact on those state races.
Appears CNN Might Be Skewing Poll Results To Make Trump Look Bad. If you were ask Rasmussen what Trump is
polling at, they'd tell you he's sporting a healthy 49 percent approval rating. If you asked CNN, however, they'd tell
you it's far lower at 35 percent. That seems like a huge discrepancy, so what's the deal? Enter the Daily Caller,
who decided to get down to the bottom of the mystery of the missing approval numbers, and what they found shows that CNN
might not be playing all that fair. Collecting the data from CNN and SSRS, a market research firm, the Daily Caller
showed several factors that could contribute to the disparity between polls, including two major factors. For starters
CNN/SSRS poll over-sampled Democrats and Independents, and it sampled "adults," not potential voters.
Thought America Hated Donald Trump. Watch any cable or network news station or read the newspaper, and you will
be told that President Trump is unpopular. That Americans don't like him. The Washington Post proclaims that
"Trump is historically unpopular." Predicting big trouble ahead for Republicans, the Post tells readers, "There's never been
a president who was as deeply unpopular for as long as he has been at this stage of his presidency." Newsweek goes
farther with its headline: "Trump's 2018 approval ratings show he's the most unpopular president in history and failing
at his job." The Washington Examiner, not a far-left publication but firmly in the NeverTrump camp, asks, "So why is Trump
still the most unpopular first-term president?" You get the point. These articles were all written last month, in
the wake of a historic tax cut, with millions of Americans gaining bonuses and a fatter paycheck, plus a stock market hitting
record highs despite a recent and necessary correction. Yet the media smart set is quite certain that America hates
President Trump. Why? Opinion polls. You know the names. Quinnipiac, Ipsos, Rasmussen, CNN, Fox News,
and others. Remember these same polls about 15 months ago? The ones that predicted with 95-plus-percent
certainty that Hillary Clinton would win the election? Even on election day?
why would Americans' positive perception of the U.S. surge this past year? A new Gallup Poll finds that nearly
half of all Americans are satisfied with their perception of the U.S. position in the world. That's the highest that
collective national perception has been in 13 years. And, get this, the 45 percent who feel that way is fully
13 points higher than it was just a year ago. Why do you suppose that is? A year ago. Hmm, what happened
in the winter of 2017 that could possibly explain a surge in positive self-perceptions of the U.S. global position?
know much about history.... This new poll, put out by a couple of political science professors, places
President Trump at rock bottom in its rankings of all the U.S. presidents. Worse than Warren G. Harding. Worse
than James Buchanan. Worse than Franklin Pierce. Worse than Jimmy Carter. And certainly worse than Barack
Obama, who correspondingly rose to the top ten in the same estimation of the same political scientists. After bringing
us the Iran deal, Obamacare, the one-way love-fest with Castro, the unmaskings, the IRS targeting of dissidents, the global
apology tour, the SEIU thugcraft, the politicization of the Department of Justice, and Ben Rhodes, he's top ten!
Campaign Manager Wants Pollsters "Shot" For Recent Polls Showing Democrats Losing Support Among Voters. Jim
Messina is an odd guy. Always has been. Always will be. He was the lumpy outcast with a penchant for
canoodling just enough with the then-Obama campaign's legion of media supporters to give himself some political street
cred. Work was easy back then though. Obama had few strong opponents in D.C., and fewer still among the media
elite. Then came Donald Trump and Jim Messina's world was turned upside down. The manufactured polls he once used
to great effect to manipulate opinion and validate Barack Obama have been discarded in favor of a single Trump Tweet.
And now when those same once-friendly polls show Mr. Trump gaining in popularity and Democrats increasingly despised,
Jim Messina offers up this rather aggressive solution: "I think all public pollsters should be shot."
Last Two Weeks of Polls Have Been Great for Republicans. Do They Signal a Shift? The Democratic advantage
on the generic congressional ballot, which asks people whether they'll vote for Democrats or Republicans for Congress, has
dwindled since the heart of the tax debate in December. Then, nearly all surveys put Republicans behind by double
digits. Now, poll averages put the Democratic lead at only around six or seven percentage points. The question isn't
really whether Republican standing has improved recently. It has. The question is whether anyone should care:
Is it just one of many blips and bumps along the road, or does it say something meaningful about the midterm elections?
Wave' Evaporates, 2018 Generic Ballot Back to Dead Heat. A Monmouth University poll released Wednesday shows
Democrats with only a "negligible edge" over Republicans for November's Congressional elections. The poll, conducted
over three days almost entirely before President Donald Trump's well-received State of the Union Address, shows 47 percent of
respondents saying they would vote for a generic congressional Democrat compared to 45 percent for a generic Republican, well
within the poll's 3.5 percent margin of error. This figure is a massive shift from earlier polls showing double digit
Democratic leads and fueling pundits' talk of a "blue wave" that could sweep Republicans from power. The same polling
agency, the Monmouth University Polling Institute (MUPI), found a 15 point generic Democratic advantage using the same
question only last month.
Zogby: Trump brought 'A game,' boosted GOP 2018 chances, 2020 re-election. In an unusually positive
review, Democratic pollster John Zogby said that President Trump brought his "A game" to the State of the Union Address and
bolstered chances that the GOP will retain control of Congress in the midterm elections and maybe his own re-election odds.
"He hit a solid triple tonight. If he can sustain this message and tone, he will cross home plate standing up," blogged
Zogby, who co-authors our weekly White House Report Card.
How's The US Economy Doing?" On a quarterly basis we use Google Trends as essentially a thermometer for a range
of social and capital markets measurements. How are Americans feeling about themselves and their economic
prospects? Are they interested in investing? Those are queries most often answered by polls and surveys, of
course. But Google Trends lets us see what people are searching for online, in the privacy of their homes. And
that can be much more telling than what they reveal to a random phone survey taker.
The Media Tries To Pressure Gun Rights Advocates Into Gun Control Support. Despite claims to the contrary, gun
rights advocates are a large and active voting block. There's a reason lawmakers in pro-gun regions —
regions that make up the bulk of the nation — make it a point to present their pro-gun credentials when running
for office. While polls occasionally claim most people support some kind of gun control, those polls rarely delve
deeper into how important the issue is for those people. Most don't so much support new regulations so much as think,
"Yeah, sounds good." In their minds, however, there are bigger issues to tackle and so they don't care enough about gun
control for it to make a difference in their voting.
Says The GOP Tax Cuts Are Unpopular? Poll after poll shows that few support the Republican tax-cut plan.
But when pollsters bother to ask about specifics in the bill, support skyrockets. Guess which results make the headlines?
Breaking Down The
CBS News Gun Poll. CBS News released the results of a new poll on the topic of guns. There are some
interesting tidbits in there for discussion, but there's also a lot that shouldn't be overly surprising.
of Fox News On the Line with Poll That Shows Jones Up by 10. Fox News put its credibility on the line when it
released a new poll on Monday that shows liberal Democrat Doug Jones leads conservative Republican Roy Moore by 10 points,
50 percent to 40 percent, in tomorrow's special election for the U.S. Senate in Alabama. The contrast between
the results reported by Fox News and every other recent major poll could not be sharper.
Manuevers To Manipulate Alabama Voters. Fox News is back in action with the single most ridiculous, psy-op
engineered, agenda polls in the last several years[,] and coming from a CTH community that has reviewed hundreds of media
polls in the past 5 years, that's quite a statement. [...] There is a NINETEEN point difference between both Alabama
Polls. However, only ONE is a media driven agenda poll. Can you guess which one?
and Tired of Schumer and Others Continually Lying about Tax Cuts and Debt. What makes me sicker is that almost
all reporters just repeat Schumer's talking points as if they are factual. They repeat the outright lies over and over
again, and then after indoctrinating the readers with pure garbage, they take a poll of fewer than 1,000 people, skewed
with more Democrats than Republicans, to show that the people aren't in favor of reform. Then they run the poll results
as if they are somehow factual news. Reporters should be truly ashamed of themselves for pushing an agenda instead of
ever even considering reporting actual results of previous tax cuts.
Call Florida and get some hanging chads! Exclusive:
New poll shows Roy Moore and Doug Jones in statistical tie. A new Raycom News Network Senate Election poll
conducted by Strategy Research finds the race in a statistical tie nearly two weeks after allegations of sexual misconduct
against Republican Roy Moore rocked the campaign. The exclusive poll of 3,000 likely Alabama voters finds if the
election were held today, Moore would receive 47% of the vote to Democrat Doug Jones with 45%. Five percent of the
respondents remain undecided with 3% indicating plans to Write-In a candidate.
Oversample: Fox News Poll Claims Roy Moore Losing Despite Faulty Numbers. A Fox News Poll of 649 likely
voters in Alabama released on Thursday and conducted between Monday and Wednesday of this week shows Democratic candidate
Doug Jones with an eight point lead over Republican candidate Judge Roy Moore in the December 12 special election for the
Alabama U.S. Senate seat once held by Attorney General Jeff Sessions, 50 percent to 42 percent, with a 3.5 percent
margin of error. That poll stands in striking contrast to a Fox10/Strategy Research poll of 3,000 likely voters in Alabama
released on Wednesday [11/15/2017] and conducted on Monday of this week that shows Moore with a six point lead over Jones,
49 percent to 43 percent, with a two percent margin of error.
News poll: Jones beating Moore by 8 points. A new poll shows Democrat Doug Jones leading by 8 points in
the Alabama Senate race in the wake of sexual misconduct allegations against his opponent, GOP candidate Roy Moore. Jones
is supported by 50 percent of likely voters surveyed in the deep-red state, while 42 percent of likely voters support
Moore, according to the Fox News poll released Thursday. The survey was conducted Nov. 13-15. The last Fox News
poll on the race, conducted in mid-October, showed Jones and Moore tied. Another recent poll from the Senate GOP's
campaign arm showed Moore trailing by double digits.
the media refuses to learn. So let us go back and revisit where they went wrong. They trusted
polls. A year ago today, Nate Silver gave Donald Trump less than a 14% chance of winning — two weeks before
the election. His prediction was 338 Electoral College votes for her, 198 for Trump. Silver saw her taking all of
Obama's 2012 states, plus Arizona and North Carolina. Michigan? Michigan! Don't make me laugh. He
gave Trump an 8% chance in Michigan. Democrats would take the Senate. And Silver was the cautious one.
Political Poll Shows Just How Unreliable Polling Can Be. A new survey from NBC News/Wall Street Journal is the
perfect example of the utter worthlessness of public polling as it relates to the implementation of government policy.
In the poll, which covers numerous political topics, one question stands out: "Would you favor or oppose a single-payer
health care system in which all Americans would get their health insurance from one government plan that is financed by
Taxes?" To this question, 47% said they "favored" such a system, 46% said they "opposed," and 7% said they were "not
sure." However, when pollsters added a bit of specificity to the question, the results changed rather dramatically.
How Legacy Media Manipulates Polling and Lies to You About... Everything. [Scroll down] In every poll, Democrat
respondents outnumbered Republicans by significant amounts. The Economist poll was the worst. Only 24 percent
of respondents (360) were Republicans compared to 38 percent (570) Democrats — which means that 58 percent
more Democrats were polled than Republicans, as shown in the %D/R column. On average, in these seven widely recognized
national polls, only 29 percent (409 people) of the total 1,383 polled were Republicans, while 37 percent (518)
were Democrats. Another way of saying it is that, on average, 29 percent more Democrats than Republicans were polled.
This occurs because of the way these polls are constructed. Most use a methodology that queries a random sample of adults.
That sounds "fair" and one would expect it to produce roughly equivalent numbers of Republicans and Democrats, but it does not.
Today's Impeachment-Push Poll. Reporters Susan Page and Emma Kinery proclaimed a dark omen in the results,
which is why the newspaper asked the poll question. They said, "Just six months after his inauguration, Americans
already are split down the middle, 42%-42%, over whether President Trump should be removed from office, a new USA
TODAY/iMediaEthics Poll finds." What's the impeachable offense? If a national poll were to emerge with a 42-42 tie
over the belief that the moon is made of Swiss cheese, would the subsequent analysis focus on the concentration of moon
matter or the irrationality of 42% of the American people? It doesn't matter that the prospect for impeachment is zero
with Republicans in control of Congress.
Approval Polls and 'Junk' Journalism are Fake Views Pushed by Fake News. The latest rod by which to beat the
President of the United States is a Washington Post/ABC News poll showing Mr. Trump's approval ratings languishing at
36 percent. [...] The poll was performed by AbtAssociates — a swamp dweller-staffed research and policy shop in
Cambridge, MA. AbtAssociates board members include former Bob Dole, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, Planned Parenthood, World
Bank, and Deloitte staffers. In other words, it is a microcosm of the party of Davos.
Trump Favorability Polls As Fake As Fake News Can Get. Want to know a dirty little secret liberal media pundits
don't want you to know? Donald Trump is far more popular with the American people than any of the far left polling data
would have you believe. Those very same polls that were so wrong in predicted the 2016 presidential outcome are being
used again to try and convince Americans Trump is an unpopular and highly divisive president. These polling firms lied
repeatedly during the 2016 election cycle and they have continued lying about the POTUS Trump's popularity among voters.
Are Screwing Up Again. Most national pollsters are back churning out biased and misleading poll numbers after
recovering from their shock over President Donald Trump's 2016 election victory, according to The Daily Caller News
Foundation Investigative Group analysis. "I do know inherently there is a Democratic bias in the polls. And most
of them will deny it" says Raghavan Mayur, an independent pollster who is president of TechnoMetrica, which leads the polling
operations at Investor's Business Daily.
They're Wrong About Everything.
Events are turning me into a radical skeptic. I no longer believe what I read, unless what I am reading is an
empirically verifiable account of the past. I no longer have confidence in polls, because it has become impossible to
separate the signal from the noise. What I have heard from the media and political class over the last several years
has been so spectacularly proven wrong by events, again and again, that I sometimes wonder why I continue to read two
newspapers a day before spending time following journalists on Twitter.
You Should Be Skeptical About Polls on Impeaching Trump. Among registered voters in a Politico/Morning Consult
poll at the end of May, 43% want Congress to begin impeachment proceedings against President Trump, up from 38% the week
before. But experts say the polls may mean less than they appear to show. Three polls by CNN/ORC showed roughly
similar numbers of adults-about 30%-wanted to impeach President Clinton in 1998, President Bush in 2006 and President Obama
in 2014, even though the presidents were in very different circumstances. And Gallup polls from the Watergate era show
a clear majority of Americans didn't support impeaching Nixon and removing him from office until August of 1974-the same
month he resigned.
Fake News to Fake Polls. The media blob is making much of a Washington Post/ABC News poll that finds the public
by a 2 to 1 margin opposes President Trump's decision to withdraw from the Paris Accord: [...] You need to click through to
the actual poll questions to see what [an incompetent] poll it is. The poll only asked five questions. [...]
Conspicuously missing are any questions about whether people support appropriations for wealth transfers from the U.S to
developing nations that the Paris Accord included (and into which Obama tossed $1 billion)? No questions, also,
about whether people are willing to pay higher energy costs for an agreement that will make no difference to the planet's
temperature 80 years from now, according to the EPA's own models.
Really Torpedoed Hillary's Campaign? What about the polls? All the smart set pollsters told us Clinton would win.
In a landslide. From Real Clear Politics to poll guru Nate Silver, all agreed that Mrs. Clinton had a 90 to 95 percent
chance of winning. And stuck with this up until election night.
Post poll hides: Trump still beats Clinton, 43%-40%. A new Washington Post poll that declares President
Trump as "the least popular president in modern times," waits until the second to last paragraph to reveal another
tidbit: He'd still beat Hillary Rodham Clinton if the election were held today and in the popular vote, not just
Electoral College. The poll found that Trump's polls continue to be upside down, with a 42 percent approval
and 53 percent disapproval.
ran the worst presidential campaign ever. In the last weeks before the election, the Hillary Clinton campaign
did no polling. No. Polling. Whatsoever. Oh, it had data. Lots and lots of data.
Analytics, even. Data analytics! But it had no independent information on the overall field of battle in states
like Florida, Michigan, Virginia, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania. So when the election began to turn Donald Trump's
way, the Clinton campaign had no idea.
by polling blind spot. As they investigate the forces behind the party's stunning losses in November, Democrats
are coming to a troubling conclusion. The party didn't just lose among rural white voters on Election Day, it may have
failed to capture them in its pre-election polling as well. Many pollsters and strategists believe that rural white
voters, particularly those without college degrees, eluded the party's polling altogether — and their absence from
poll results may have been both a cause and a symptom of Donald Trump's upset victory over Hillary Clinton in several states.
Touts Anti-Trump Poll with Warped Demographics Conducted by Soros-Backed Org. The Associated Press on Monday
released a news making story with a glaring headline claiming that "Most young Americans don't see Trump as a legitimate
leader." A closer look at the survey finds it was conducted by a group financed by billionaire George Soros whose
activist arm demands reparations for slavery and "mass incarceration," and has engaged in anti-police activism. In
addition, the survey was not representative of the racial and ethnic profiles of young adults. Instead it focused
heavily on demographic samples of populations that voted overwhelmingly against Donald Trump.
Media Hides Its Own Disapproval Rating. The latest poll by USA Today and Suffolk University carried some eye-opening numbers about
public disapproval of the media's aggressive attempts to run the country. It found that President Trump has a 47% approval rating and that
44% disapprove of him. That's not surprising. The media talk about his unpopularity all the time. But here's what they don't talk
about: their own numbers. Only 37% of Americans have a favorable opinion of their job performance. A whopping 50% have an
new poll shows a majority think Jeff Sessions lied and should resign. Be skeptical. A new poll from
Quinnipiac University has a splashy finding: A majority of people think that Attorney General Jeff Sessions lied under
oath about his communications with Russian officials while working with the Trump campaign and should resign —
52 percent and 51 percent, according to the poll. I was a little surprised by this. And upon further
inspection, there are a few reasons for skepticism. [...] This poll seems to be a great example of the way you ask the question
determining the answers you get.
poll: Majority of Dems consider Trump an "enemy," majority of Republicans consider Democrats an "enemy". Among Republicans,
43 percent say the media is an "enemy" while another 35 percent say it's "unfriendly." Interestingly, despite endless whining
from Democrats online that the media is either too right-wing or insufficiently left, fully 60 percent of Democrats polled here acknowledge
that the media is either an "ally" or "friendly." I wonder about the phrasing of the questions, though. Instead of asking straightforwardly
"Do you regard the media as an enemy?", YouGov asked "Would you say that the media is an enemy to people like you?" Phrasing it that way
leaves it unclear to the respondent which way the hostility is supposed to be running in the "enemy" relationship.
is stronger than national polls suggest. President Trump is still popular in core Republican strongholds, even
though he has suffered a dip in the national public opinion polls. Trump's approval rating is 45 percent, an underwater
mark previously unseen for a president this early in his first term. But Trump's image and his policies are holding up
just fine among voters in Republican districts and states key to the president's ability to drive his agenda through Congress,
and his party's success in 2018.
Those Latest Media Polls. Amid the jaw-dropping revelations within the U.S. body politic in 2016, one of the
most important was the American electorate discovering that Media Polling is just as brutally biased as the media entities
who present the polling results. With election 2016 behind us, and predicting "media opinion polls" once again being
used in 2017 to create false narratives, the truth behind the intentionally constructed 2016 deception must not simply fade
back into the shadows. Never again should the American voter trust polling presented by corporate media.
Everything about media polling is a financed and manufactured fraud.
The Editor says...
The polling industry will never go out of business for at least two reasons: First, because one cannot underestimate the gullibility of
couch-potato consumers of TV news shows; and second because most TV news organizations don't have their own polling people on staff, so
they rely on polls that they read about in the New York Times.
slams 'rigged' polls of his public approval. President-elect Donald Trump blasted 'rigged' opinion polls Tuesday [1/17/2017]
as two different surveys pegged him as the least popular man to take the oath of office in four decades, with a popularity rating just half
of what Barack Obama's was eight years ago. 'The same people who did the phony election polls, and were so wrong, are now doing approval
rating polls,' Trump tweeted Tuesday morning. 'They are rigged just like before.' Trump set out his missive amid blaring
headlines about his record-low popularity upon taking office, and negative ratings for his handling of the transition period.
ABC / WaPo Poll Shows Drop In Trump Favorability Courtesy Of Aggressive "Oversamples". In the month leading up
to the election on November 8th, we repeatedly demonstrated how the mainstream media polls from the likes of ABC/Washington
Post, CNN and Reuters repeatedly manipulated their poll samples to engineer their desired results, namely a large Hillary
Clinton lead. In fact, just 16 days prior to the election an ABC/Wapo poll showed a 12-point lead for Hillary, a result
that obviously turned out to be embarrassingly wrong for the pollsters. But, proving they still got it, ABC/Washington Post
and CNN are out with a pair of polls on Trump's favorability this morning that sport some of the most egregious "oversamples"
Poll News: Public Says Trump Can't Handle Being President? A Gallup poll seemed to put a damper on Donald
Trump's presidency before he's even sworn in, with fewer than half the public saying he's up to the job of being president.
At least, that's how the results are being reported. But a closer look at the data tells a much different story.
Fall For This Poll Showing Only About 1 in 4 Wants Trump to Repeal Obamacare. The Kaiser in question, creator
of the Kaiser Family Foundation, was a rich industrialist and auto manufacturer who also founded Kaiser Permanente, one of
the largest health care organizations in America, and a primary beneficiary of Obamacare. As for the biased nature of
anything issuing from the polling fundament of the Associated Press, after the egregious fiascos committed during the
campaign season in AP's headlong, all-in efforts to stop Trump and elect Hillary, little more needs to be said.
Another dead giveaway: No link to the poll's internals.
Caddell: 'Grace, That's What's Missing' as Obamas Prepare to Leave White House. Political pollster and analyst
Pat Caddell told Breitbart News Daily SiriusXM host Alex Marlow on Monday [12/19/2016] that, concerning the Obamas
leaving the White House, "We are watching this ending here. It's not quite as bad as the Clintons ... but the lack of
grace, that's what's missing here." [...] Additionally, pointing out that, post-election, no one in major media was fired
or demoted for getting the election so wrong. "None of them have been fired. Are you kidding?" he said. "The
pollsters who are bad," he continued, "what are they doing? They're back with new polls this week."
Fake News Versus Junk News.
The big "fake news" stories of 2016 were the polls. Most showed Donald Trump losing big in November, thus cable news
ran countless renditions of the many ways Trump could not possibly win the necessary Electoral College vote. Getting
the story utterly wrong should result in hand-wringing, hair-pulling and painful introspection in my profession; instead many
in the news business have turned their hungry eyes on "fake news" disseminated on Facebook and Google. That's
right. After a year of getting the story consistently wrong, journalism gurus are pointing to phony stories not
produced by the mainstream media.
Become Idols. Hillary and her supporters on PBS, CNN, NBC, ABC, and CBS are always using the word "inclusivity"
as expressing her vision for America, thus they suppose that Trump's interest in putting more controls on illegal immigration
or refugee admission is exclusionary, whereas he is merely talking about some practical restraints, not the elimination of
our inclusive history. Thus, polling pundits failed to factor out or offset their own P.C. bias in interpreting the
feedback from voters and potential voters. Pollsters must ask questions, and the questions as well as the hearing of
the answers require an interpretive cognitive framework that governs the creation of the questions and the understanding of
the responses. Thus, the polling questions may be distorted and colored by bias from beginning to end.
the Polling Miss of the 2016 Election in Perspective. Over all, the national polls missed the result by only a
few points: Hillary Clinton is on track to win the popular vote by around 1.5 percentage points, not especially far
from her roughly four-point lead in an average of national polls. But the state polls were a different story.
They systematically underestimated Donald J. Trump's standing in the Upper Midwest and Northeast. His strength
there was enough to make him the president. Few saw it coming.
thoughts from a 'deplorable'. Wikileaks also exposed the collusion with the Clinton campaign and pollsters and
the MSM; thus the public refused to believe those polls showing Hillary winning. Trump also cited a warning of this
deceit. We no longer believed anything reported in the mainstream press which had abdicated all journalistic ethics by
their blatant bias for Clinton.
PPD Poll Was the Most Accurate in 2016. It Wasn't Even Close. The USC Dornsife/LA Times Presidential Election
Poll and Investor's Business Daily TIPP Poll are taking victory laps for predicting Donald J. Trump would defeat Hillary
Clinton. But they, and those in the media citing them, are inaccurately claiming those two polls were the only two that
got it right. "Not one other national poll had Trump winning in four-way polls," IBD Editorials falsely claimed last
week. Sorry, but that's incorrect. In fact, they predicted the eventual winner, but missed the actual margin.
Pundits: Clueless, Spectacularly Clueless. On October 1, according to the New York Times, the odds were
76 percent in Hillary Clinton's favour and steadily increased from there. On the very eve of the election the Times
declared that the probability of a Clinton victory was 85 percent. The pollsters tried hard. After the unexpected
victory of Brexit in the United Kingdom, they realised that their models could be wrong. They tried to take into account
voter turn-out and the limitations of telephone polling. They failed. But it wasn't just the number crunchers who
failed. The pundits read in the tea leaves that Clinton would bring together a coalition of workers, professionals, black
and Hispanics which would propel her to victory. [...] Yet she lost.
Media and the Pollsters have lost their clout by incompetence and deceit. Pre-election night polls and media
coverage reflected that leftist monoculture. The pollsters who should now begin shuttering their shops and looking for
real work. After months of predicting a certain substantial Hillary win, they predicted the following results:
NBC/SM: Clinton +6 Ipsos: Clinton +4 NBC/WSJ: Clinton +4
ABC/WaPo: Clinton +4 Herald: Clinton +4 Bloomberg: Clinton
+3 Only IBD and Dornslife predicted a Trump win.
Explains How It "Fudged" Its Polls. Over the past couple of weeks, we have constantly pointed out that polling
data was seemingly being manipulated to "manufacture" artificial leads for the mainstream media's chosen candidate, Hillary
Clinton. By "oversampling" democrats and/or various minority groups, pollster after pollster kept rolling out
predictions that seemed utterly ridiculous to us but were gobbled up by complicit media outlets.
Important Post-Election Message About Media Polling. The media didn't get it wrong. The pollsters did
not work from the wrong data set; the media pollsters, consultants and professional political class did not work from the
wrong assumptions, or use the incorrect baselines. THEY LIED. The professional media polling agents knew exactly
what the truth was. They lied and manipulated their data in a concerted effort to intentionally falsify reality. There should
be no doubt, EVER, in the mind of any political observer as to what took place within the expressed and broadcasted polling which fueled
over two years of broadcast news. The media intentionally lied. They knew the truth. The same tools available
to us, and to those who were ridiculed for truth-telling, were available to them and many more. They did not get it wrong.
They chose to lie to you the American electorate.
How the polls, including
ours, missed Trump's victory. Two days ago, pollsters and statisticians gave Hillary Clinton odds of between 75
and 99 percent of winning the U.S. presidential election. How did so many get it so wrong? In hindsight, the
polling consensus went astray in two major ways. The media, including Reuters, pumped out two kinds of poll
stories. Some were national surveys designed to estimate the entire country's popular vote, but not the outcome in
individual states, where the contest is actually decided. [...] News organizations also produced a blizzard of stories meant
to calculate the probability of victory for the two candidates. These calculations were predicated on polls of
call future of political polling into question. For pollsters, the 2016 presidential election will go down as
more than an embarrassment — it threatens to spiral into an existential crisis. At the moment we needed them
most, when the nation was desperate for accurate projections, many pollsters whiffed. Although most correctly predicted
Hillary Clinton's narrow popular-vote victory, vaunted poll averages and complex mathematical forecasts largely failed to
envision Donald Trump's rise to the presidency through a convincing triumph in the Electoral College. The ramifications
reverberated swiftly Wednesday, as pundits and voters mocked the surveyors for bumbling their quadrennial moment in the spotlight.
did polls miss the presidential election result so badly? Heading into Election Day, virtually all public
polling — at the national and swing-state level — pointed to a relatively easy victory for Democrat
Hillary Clinton. That, um, didn't happen. In search of the "why" behind that poll fail, I contacted my longtime
friend Jon Cohen. Jon was once the head of polling at The Washington Post, but in his new life he serves as the senior
vice president of Survey Monkey, the leading purveyor of Internet-based polls.
suffer huge embarrassment. Pollsters and election modelers suffered an industry-shattering embarrassment at the
hands of Donald Trump on Tuesday night. Trump, the Republican presidential nominee, had long said the polls were biased
against him. His claims — dismissed and mocked by the experts — turned out to be true.
"It's going to put the polling industry out of business," said CNN anchor Jake Tapper. "It's going to put the voter
projection industry out of business."
Final Calls: Hillary Wins Big, 50-50 Senate. Hillary Clinton will win the presidency with more than 300
electoral votes, and the Senate will be tied at 50-50 between Republicans and Democrats according to Larry Sabato's Crystal
Ball final projections ahead of Tuesday's vote.
Did Polls & Experts Get the 2016 Election So Wrong? Donald Trump defied the pundits and polls to defeat Hillary
Clinton in Tuesday's presidential election. Larry Sabato, director of the University of Virginia's Center for Politics,
appeared on "Fox & Friends" this morning to explain how pollsters' predictions — which overwhelmingly favored
Clinton — were so wrong.
USC/L.A. Times poll saw what other surveys missed: A wave of Trump support. For most of the last four
months, the USC/L.A. Times Daybreak tracking poll has been the great outlier of the 2016 campaign — consistently
showing a better result for Donald Trump than other surveys did. In light of Tuesday's election returns, the poll now
looks like the only major survey to see the wave coming.
laugh! Here are the final media polls before election. All of the so called "pollsters" and eggheads were
so convinced that Hillary Clinton would win the election and likely get at least 300 EVs. There were only two polls
yesterday which showed a win for Donald Trump. The L.A. Times daily tracking poll which had Trump +3 and the IBD/TPPP
poll which had Trump winning by two in a four way race. The other polls, all had Hillary Clinton winning. Let's
review them and mock them.
Trump's upset win teaches us about free will and the limits of statistics. [Scroll down] Today,
statistics are being used for everything from determining health care costs to how to educate our children to who is likely
to be a criminal. In some cases, academics are advocating abandoning our understanding of basic human rights to promote
healthier living through science. If we can use numbers to determine who will be a criminal and who won't, why bother
with this whole justice system folderol? This is the same mindset that drove the American eugenics movement, where
experts thought they had the knowledge to know who was fit to reproduce. Basically, a blind faith in data is in danger
of driving the surrender of essential liberty to government planners who know better. The Austrian School understood,
nearly 100 ago, that such planning is impossible to do effectively because people are not cogs in a machine. They are
individuals capable of choosing their own fates.
did pollsters get Trump, Clinton election so wrong? Pollsters flubbed the 2016 presidential election in seismic
fashion. Donald Trump's victory dealt a devastating blow to the credibility of the nation's leading pollsters, calling
into question their mathematical models, assumptions and survey methods. Several months of polls pegged Hillary Clinton
as the leader in the polarizing race and as the leader in many key battleground states. But Trump's surge crushed the
conventional wisdom among pollsters. Early Wednesday [11/9/2016], he was far outpacing projections across the board.
suffer huge embarrassment. Pollsters and election modelers suffered an industry-shattering embarrassment at the
hands of Donald Trump on Tuesday night. Trump had long said the polls were biased against him. His claims — dismissed
and mocked by the experts — turned out to be true. "It's going to put the polling industry out of business," said CNN
anchor Jake Tapper. "It's going to put the voter projection industry out of business." Going into Election Day, a
strong majority of pollsters and election modelers forecast that Hillary Clinton would coast to victory, with many predicting
she would sweep the battlegrounds and win north of 300 electoral votes. The final University of Virginia Center for
Politics model had Clinton winning 322 electoral votes to 216 for Trump, with Clinton winning Florida, North Carolina,
Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin — all states that she lost.
Exit polls under
siege. Ever since Jimmy Carter's early concession in 1980 was blamed for losses to down-ballot Democrats in
Western states, both politicians and media outlets have been religious about not reporting the results until everyone's
voted. But that's all about to change, starting early Tuesday morning [11/8/2016]. This year, a handful of different
projects are underway to disrupt the rhythm and flow of information on Election Day — including one controversial
effort that some worry could affect the actual election results.
It Comes to Polls, We Need Something Between Absolute Faith and Absolute Denial. Yes, the polls in 2012 were
off, with the average pollster underestimating Obama's lead and largely unprepared for how effectively the Obama campaign's
get-out-the-vote effort would change the electorate. But most of the polls were off by one, two, or three percentage
points. Yes, the polls in 2014 were off, with the average pollster overestimating Senate Democratic candidates'
performance by 4 percentage points and overestimating gubernatorial Democratic candidates' performance by 3 percentage
points. But quite a few elections that year were outside that margin. Yes, every once in a while, you get a race
where the election day winner didn't lead any poll — like Republican Larry Hogan's victory in Maryland in 2014 and
Matt Bevin's victory in Kentucky in 2015. Yes, sometimes you'll get very contradictory results from different pollsters
surveying the same state at the same time.
Are Still Being Used as Weapons. The major polls that everybody talks about, NBC, ABC, New York Times, Wall
Street Journal, Monmouth, you name it, all show Hillary Clinton anywhere up from three to five points. Now, in every
case the Hillary win is within the margin of error. They don't make a big point of telling you that. My point is
I think the polls are still being used as weapons and that's a departure from my previously stated theories and beliefs.
And I finally asked myself, I mean, if we don't trust the news every day from these people, why would we trust their polls?
Voting a Poor Predictor of Final Results. As we wind down this election, we begin to hear the familiar chime: The
election is over and/or can be predicted because of what we see in the early vote. Don't buy it. While we might be able to
make some broad projections based upon early voting — maybe — we're more likely to substitute our own judgments
and arbitrary intuitions for actual results. There are (at least) three reasons this it true. [...]
Leads in Average of National Polls Released Tuesday. Four national tracking polls have been released so far Tuesday
[11/1/2016]. Average them out, and you get a one-point lead for Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton. Mrs. Clinton
has crashed in the ABC/Washington Post poll, which just last week had her up by 12 points but which today shows a one-point
lead for Trump. [...] Other interesting polls released today come out of Virginia, which was supposed to be a lock for
Hillary Clinton. A Washington Post poll has her up by six, while an Emerson University survey puts Clinton's margin at
only four points. But a Franklin & Marshall poll has Clinton leading by 11 points in Pennsylvania.
it's Clinton saying the polls are rigged. Hillary Clinton's campaign is claiming 'bad polling' is responsible
for the candidate's sudden fall from grace in a daily tracking survey she's lead since May, not her emails. A senior
campaign official told reporters traveling with Clinton today an ABC News/Washington Post poll that gave Donald Trump a
one-point advantage was wrong. 'It's just not what we see at all. It's not what other people seem to have.
There just seems to be something about that model that seems off,' the aide said.
The Stretch Drive
(6). [T]he ABC News/Washington Post tracking poll today [11/1/2016] has Trump leading by 1 point.
Yes, yes, margin of error, mumble mumble — but there's no avoiding the obvious fact that Hillary's once large lead
has evaporated. The state-by-state polls showing Hillary still ahead should be viewed with skepticism.
Leads Clinton by 1 Point in New Poll as Enthusiasm Declines. In the latest results, 46 percent of likely voters
support Trump, and 45 percent are for Clinton. With the data taken to a decimal place for illustrative purposes, a mere
0.7 of a percentage point divides them. Third-party candidate Gary Johnson has 3 percent, a new low; Jill Stein,
tanked before Comey's surprise. Hillary Clinton's campaign was floundering before the FBI announced on Friday
that federal agents are back to investigating her for breaking the law as secretary of State. Readers may recall that
on Wednesday I noticed a 4-point drop in Hillary's lead in the ABC tracking poll. The next day it dropped another two
points. Then it dropped to 4 and now it is at a two-point lead for Hillary. That is a ten-point drop in four
days — before Friday's news.
News/Washington Post Tracking Poll: Ten Point Swing For Donald Trump In Four Days. Republican
Presidential nominee Donald Trump is rising in the polls, according to the latest ABC News/Washington Post poll. Trump
is now at 45 percent with likely voters, up seven points from his low of 38 percent earlier in the month. Hillary
Clinton is at 47 percent while Gary Johnson is at four percent and Jill Stein is at two percent.
Visual Guide to Disputing Media Polling. The purpose of this article is to prove that the media is either lying
to massively impact motivation or turnout for Trump or has absolutely no idea what the actual score is. The media don't
care if I know what they are doing with their nonstop analysis of new "chaos" within the Trump campaign. They are
playing this sad song for the record number of independent voters who appear to be requesting ballots or voting early in
battlegrounds across America. The first clue is that in the same week, ABC and CNN have polls showing a massive lead
and a comfortable lead, respectively. These two polls are seven points apart. Obama's landslide win from 2008 was
by a margin of 7.6%, and he still lost 22 states.
Times Tracking Poll: Donald Trump Leading Hillary Clinton Again. Donald Trump's polling numbers are
ticking back up, according to the latest L.A. Times tracking poll. Trump is now at 45.8 percent nationally in the poll,
while Hillary Clinton is 44.5 percent, per the Times' website. However, the sponsor of the poll — the
Center for Economic and Social Research — seems to have interpreted the data differently and shows Trump with a
slightly larger lead: 45.8 percent to Clinton's 44.1.
Hillary Clinton's Lead Shrinking in Michigan. Hillary Clinton is maintaining a six to seven point lead over Donald Trump
in Michigan, according to two new polls — but her lead has shrunk since earlier in the month when she held an 11 point
advantage. A Free Press/WXYZ-TV poll reveals Clinton with a seven point lead over Trump, 41 percent to 34 percent.
Earlier this month, Clinton topped Trump in Michigan by roughly 11 points.
'oversampling' is a dirty trick. Without random sampling, the fundamental math basis of statistics goes
kablooey. Oversampling one side or the other is an invitation to make false conclusions, and any decent scientist or
statistician avoids biased sampling like the Black Plague. No scientific journal in the world would accept an article
based on biased sampling. Like so many Demo-mafia tactics, this one counts on voter laziness. The Media Apparatus
understands perfectly well that a single big headline, "Hillary ahead by 15 points," sways more votes than a thousand
statistical details down in the small print. Radio and TV talking heads only read the headlines. They've never
learned anything else, and they care too much about their hairdos.
Trump Has 2-Point Edge in
Bloomberg Politics Poll of Florida. Donald Trump has a slim advantage in Florida as critical independent voters
narrowly break his way in the must-win battleground state, a Bloomberg Politics poll shows. The Republican presidential
nominee has 45 percent to Democrat Hillary Clinton's 43 percent among likely voters when third-party candidates are
included, the poll found. In a hypothetical two-way race, Trump has 46 percent to Clinton's 45 percent.
push-polling strategy revealed by WikiLeaks. Donald Trump is publicly accusing Hillary of "rigging the system."
Push-polling is one way to do that. It amounts to artificially blowing up the Democratic poll numbers to "push" a psy-ops
mission — to encourage one set of voters to think they are winning and to demoralize the opposition voters, who think
they are losing. One Alinsky rule is to do what your supporters enjoy: winning feels better than losing.
Trump: Media pushing fake polls
to supress turnout. With just two weeks before Election Day and suffering a five to six-point deficit in the
polling averages, Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump is lashing out at both the media and pollsters, claiming that
the majority of surveys being conducted are rigged in favor of his opponent, Hillary Clinton. Speaking at a round-table
event with farmers in Florida on Monday, Trump dismissed claims he is losing to Clinton, arguing that the media was using
"phony polls" and downplaying those polls which show Trump tied or leading. Trump is currently trailing the former
Secretary of State by 5% in the RealClearPolitics average of polls in a four-way race. Only two polls —
the Investor's Business Daily/TIPP tracking poll and Rasmussen Reports tracking poll — have shown Trump in the
lead over the past week.
Rigged? Reports Of Voting Machines Switching Votes To Hillary In Texas. [Scroll down] Obviously,
the desired effect of such actions isn't to create a warm and fuzzy feeling for the Hillary campaign over polling data that
they know is false. Rather, the intent is to use artificial polls, like the ABC / WaPo poll released over the weekend
showing a ridiculous 12-point national lead for Hillary, to suppress the republican vote by convincing opposition voters that
the race is already over. Of course, another way that democrats have attempted to "maximize what they get out of their
media" this election cycle is by combining rigged polling data with reports from liberal newspapers, like this one from the
Washington Post, suggesting that the election is such a blowout that typical republican strongholds, like Texas, are actually
Trump +5. Presidential polls are split into two camps: MSM polls and non-MSM polls. They have
starkly different characteristics and results. MSM polls come from those you already know, and the companies themselves
have already shed their last shred of dignity and objectivity to throw in with Hillary. They also poll in discreet
measure (i.e., release a poll whenever they want one to come out). Non-MSM polls are not as well known but quite
accomplished (e.g., Rasmussen, LA Times/USC, IDB/TIPP — the most accurate in 2012 election, by the way). They
also poll daily (actually an average of the last three days). Finally, MSM polls consistently show Hillary up by an average
of 8%, whereas the non-MSM polls have shown variation based on events and a logical current tightening of the polls down to
basically +/-1% or so per candidate (e.g., Trump in the lead right now by 2% in Rasmussen's poll).
Clinton In Dead Heat As Race Hits Final Two-Week Stretch — IBD/TIPP Poll. With the presidential
election set to enter its final two weeks, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump find themselves in a near dead heat at 41% each
in a four-way race, the latest IBD/TIPP presidential tracking poll shows. Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson edged up
to 8% from 7%, while the Green Party's Jill Stein rebounded to 4% from 3%. Without rounding, Trump stands at 41.1%,
0.1 percentage point behind Clinton's 41.2%. Johnson stands at 7.7%, unrounded, while Stein is at 3.7%.
destroy the United States. The state department is conceding things in negotiations with other countries to
influence the outcome of the presidential election. Thousands of illegal voter registrations have occurred in places
like Indiana and Virginia. There are millions of dead people on voter rolls and registered in multiple states — and
voter fraud is relatively easy to detect. Electoral fraud — the fraud that takes place during the counting process —
is even more difficult for those on the outside to trace and definitively track. With wildly divergent polls providing cover, an
professional media backing Hillary more overwhelmingly than self-identified Democrats are, and a bipartisan political apparatus that
demands Trump lose, even the discovery of blatant irregularities and outright fraud won't reverse a Hillary win if it occurs.
going on with the polls? Something funny is happening in the major national polling department of this
presidential race, and no one's talking about it. First, somehow the narrative seems to be developing that the polls
show Clinton with a near insurmountable lead. [...] There is a very large gap between Trump's and Clinton's current national
standing, as revealed by Goebbels/Pravda (CBS, NBC, ABC/Washington Post), on the one hand, versus the picture painted by
three respected polling organizations that are not part of the propaganda wing of the Democratic Party, on the other.
Polls: Clinton Lead Drops to 5 in One Michigan Survey, Increases to 13 in Another. Hillary Clinton's lead
over Donald Trump in Michigan dropped to five points in one Michigan poll, while it increased to thirteen points in another
poll. A statewide poll conducted by the Marketing Resource Group showed "Hillary Clinton continues to lead Donald Trump
by five percentage points (41 percent — 36 percent) in Michigan as the campaign for President enters the
final few weeks of the election. The statewide poll, conducted by Marketing Resource Group (MRG), showed the number of
undecided voters has been reduced to just eight percent."
known for accuracy finds Clinton, Trump locked in dead heat. An independent daily tracking survey billed as
nation's most accurate shows Republican Donald Trump and Democrat Hillary Clinton knotted in a dead heat even as other polls
show her leading the presidential race. The Investor's Business Daily poll, known as IBD/TIPP, released Monday found
the top two candidates deadlocked at 41 percent, followed by Libertarian Gary Johnson at 8 percent and Green Party nominee
Jill Stein at 4 percent. What's more, since Oct. 20, the survey has shown Mr. Trump running slightly ahead of
Mrs. Clinton. He led Mrs. Clinton on Sunday by 43 to 41 percent, a marked difference from the Real Clear
Politics average, which had Mrs. Clinton ahead by six percentage points.
New Poll Finds
Hillary Clinton Leading Donald Trump by 12 Points. Hillary Clinton has jumped into a double-digit lead against
rival Donald Trump, pushed largely by disapproval of the Republican candidate, according to ABC News's inaugural 2016
election tracking poll. The Democratic nominee now leads Trump by 12 percentage points among likely voters.
On the very same day: Trump
Up 2 Points Nationwide, While Clinton Campaigns As If The Race Is Already Won. With 16 days to go until
November 8, Donald Trump leads Hillary Clinton by 2 percentage points — 43% to 41% — in a four-way
race, according to the latest IBD/TIPP presidential tracking poll. Libertarian Party candidate Gary Johnson saw his
support held steady at 7%, while the Green Party's Jill Stein dipped to 3%. Unrounded, Trump leads 42.6% to 40.8% —
a 1.8-point edge — with Johnson at 7.2% and Stein at 3.3%. Trump also holds a nearly one-point lead in a two-way
matchup — 43.2% to 42.3%.
Trump Expands Lead Over Clinton
To 2 Points — IBD/TIPP Poll. Donald Trump expanded his lead over Hillary Clinton in a four-way race
to two points, 42%-40%, in day 4 of the IBD/TIPP presidential tracking poll, with Trump moving past his Democratic rival in a
head-to-head match-up for the first time. Libertarian Party candidate Gary Johnson fell 1 point to 7%, while Green Party [candidate]
Jill Stein held at 4%. In the first three days of the tracking poll, Trump held a 1-point lead in a four-way race. Unrounded,
Trump leads 42.1% to 39.7% — a 2.4-point edge — with Johnson at 7.3% and Stein at 3.6%. Meanwhile, in a 2-way
race, Trump leads Clinton by a half-point — 42.2% to 41.7%. Previously, Clinton had led by two or three points in a 2-way
race vs. Trump.
The media thinks
the American people are mushrooms. The Los Angeles Times poll for six months calls the same people over
and over again to see how the race is going. That is expensive. The other polls do it on the cheap, randomly call
different voters each day, because that is what the textbook says you should do. Who got it right in 2012? The
Los Angeles Times poll has it tied. The rest of the polls have her up by more than six (on average).
Raw and Current State Vote Data Not Remotely Close To Media Polling. Earlier today on CNN Clinton Campaign
spokesperson Brian Fallon stated: "in the next three weeks we expect the polls to tighten significantly". [...] The
reason for Fallon's prediction is brutally obvious, the current media polls are nonsense. As a result, the polling
averages are nonsense. As a result the electoral maps the media want to sell today — based on those
polls — are nonsense.... In essence, the same bias media coverage is embedded in their biased media polls.
More Days Remain In Current MSM Narrative Cycle. The peak U.S. media false polling cycle is thankfully in the
rear-view mirror. Over the next eight days corporate media entities will begin scaling back the promoted pro-Clinton
polling advantages they have falsely inserted into the presidential election narrative. By Friday October 28th, their
manipulative cycle will have concluded.
Leading Motivation Expert Explains Why Hillary Polls are Bogus. Polls showing Hillary are "up" are unreliable,
because they do not reflect the lack of enthusiasm people supporting Hillary have. A poll is like a New Years
Resolution. Yes, people will tell you they are going to do all sorts of things — lose weight, save more
money, read more books, and vote for Hillary Clinton. The reason most people never take action is because they lack
motivation. They can't see why their lives will improve if they take action. There's no motivation.
science professor says pollsters have no idea who will vote in November. A casual observer of national polling
on the White House race might conclude that Hillary Clinton is the assured victor. All but four of the surveys taken
since the first general election debate that are included on industry website Real Clear Politics have Clinton winning
head-to-head match-ups against Donald Trump. She leads him by an average of 5.5 percent in recent surveys.
When Libertarian Gary Johnson and Green Party candidate Jill Stein are options, Clinton is still ahead by 6.3 percent.
Polling Firms Now Factoring in Democratic Voter Fraud? Trump supporters have repeatedly questioned not just the
findings, but the motives of pollsters. Earlier this week, Thomas Lifson expressed skepticism about a Hart Research
Associates poll showing Donald Trump down by 11 points. As Conservative Treehouse revealed, the organization has been a
big contributor to Hillary Clinton, handing over $220,500 in September alone. But Hart is not taken seriously by those
who follow the polling industry. Peter Hart is always identified as a "Democratic pollster," and Nate Silver, in his
detailed analysis of the 2012 presidential race, didn't bother looking at Hart's data.
'There's Something Missing in the Polling These Days'. Friday [10/14/2016] on Fox News Channel's "Fox &
Friends," Republican vice-presidential nominee Gov. Mike Pence (R-IN) questioned the accuracy of polling, which shows
his running mater Donald Trump behind against his opponent Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton. Pence
pointed to the attendance of Trump's rallies and said that suggests something different is going on that isn't reflected by
Savvy Person's Guide to Reading the Latest Polls. When a poll comes out, I start by looking at the topline
results — Hillary Clinton is plus 3 percentage points, or Donald J. Trump is plus 1, for example. But it's
also worth looking at vote share — whether Mrs. Clinton has 47 percent or 40 percent, for instance. In
particular, I care about how close the leading candidate is to 50 percent. There's more uncertainty the further a
candidate is from 50 percent and the larger the number of undecided voters. Until a candidate approaches 50 percent,
it's hard to know whether the lead is because of party unity or because the candidate has won over the key voters needed for victory.
Illegal In-Kind Campaigning? Poll Fraud.
You know about that nice NBC/WSJ "poll" that shows that Hillary is up 11, right? Well, CTH [Conservative Treehouse]
deconstructed it. [...] What CTH managed to find is that the organization that ran the poll is an organization run by a man who
currently is a SuperPAC operator for PrioritiesUSA in support of Hillary Clinton, and was involved in a similar one for President
Obama. In other words the so-called "media poll" wasn't actually run by NBC and the WSJ, it was run by a SuperPAC dedicated
to Hillary's election. The reason for the intentional bias in the poll's sample is now obvious — and
ought to have been reason enough for both NBC and the Wall Street Journal to refuse to run it at all.
widens lead in Democrat-heavy NBC-WSJ poll. [Scroll down] Another factor introducing possible bias in
polls, according to our expert, is the types of questions asked and they way they are asked. For example, respondents
in the WSJ-NBC News poll were queried about Trump's "vulgar" comments. But it appears they were not asked about any
negative Clinton developments, such as Wikileaks emails showing that, in paid speeches, she privately told Wall Street types
that she has a "private" position on issues and a different "public position," and used the phrase "open borders."
11-point lead for Hillary in WSJ-NBC poll sure looks like psy-ops. The NeverTrumps got a huge boost when the
first poll out after the infamous bawdy tapes showed an 11 point lead for Hillary a month before the election. That is
an insurmountable margin, we have been instructed. [...] The Mainstream media touted this poll endlessly. Unless, of
course, the poll was pure psy-ops. Which, thanks to some research by Sundance of Conservative Treehouse, it now
Polling Fully Exposed — About That NBC/WSJ Clinton +11 Point Poll. You have probably seen the latest
example of the media claiming a released presidential poll from NBC and The Wall Street Journal as an example of Hillary
Clinton expanding to an 11 point lead in the weekend following the "controversial" leaked tape of Donald Trump.
The claim is complete and utter nonsense. Here's the proof.
my candidate is behind, the poll must be biased. As we close in on Election Day, polls tracking the horse race
between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are everywhere. And as results are released, partisans and strategists work
hard to discredit those in which their candidate does poorly and to emphasize those in which he or she is doing well.
Some make dubious attempts to "unskew" all the polls so that they favor a particular candidate. At least some people
apparently believe that surveys are biased against their side.
You Hear the Margin of Error Is Plus or Minus 3 Percent, Think 7 Instead. As anyone who follows election
polling can tell you, when you survey 1,000 people, the margin of error is plus or minus three percentage points. This
roughly means that 95 percent of the time, the survey estimate should be within three percentage points of the true answer.
If 54 percent of people support Hillary Clinton, the survey estimate might be as high as 57 percent or as low as 51 percent,
but it is unlikely to be 49 percent. This truism of modern polling, heralded as one of the great success stories of statistics,
is included in textbooks and taught in college classes, including our own. But the real-world margin of error of election polls
is not three percentage points. It is about twice as big.
"Candy" Holt Moderates a Completely Useless Debate. Nobody Won. America Lost. I had a feeling when
Lester "Candy" Holt, who was every bit as partisan and self injecting as Candy Crowley was 4 years ago, began by talking
about 6 years of unprecedented job growth under Obama and Secretary Clinton that Trump was about to be ambushed. And I
was right. But did this completely tilted "debate" change any minds? Absolutely not. But the polls will show
Hillary with momentum and she will see a 6 to 8 point rise in her numbers over the next few days. But fear not,
the polls are not showing movement in Hillary's direction. Not at all. You see, for the past few days the pundits
and news shows have been talking about Trump's rising numbers in the polls. He has "come from behind" and the race is now
tied. But there really hasn't been much movement in the polls themselves, just in the mix of Republicans and Democrats
sampled. Can you say set up?
Good News For Donald Trump In North Carolina "Non-Media" Poll. A Suffolk University "non-media" poll released today
[9/8/2016] shows exceptionally good news for candidate Donald Trump in the quest to overcome the rigged system. Unlike most
media funded polls, the Suffolk poll is very extensive and provides full disclosure on all aspects of the construct allowing for
comprehensive research, analysis and evaluation. The general top line result shows Donald Trump winning with 44%, and Hillary
Clinton 41%. However, the fully disclosed methodology provides an even greater level of optimism.
Hillary Clinton Tampa Rally -vs- Donald Trump Tampa Rally. The media polls seem to be moving in a positive
direction for Donald Trump, but that's not the whole story. What's really going on is the media smoothing out the
methodology and assumptions while trying to remain relevant. Nothing more. Polls don't swing 15± points
every few weeks... it just doesn't happen. As we have outlined for years, all "media polling" is fraught with the same
ideological bias inherent in the publication and broadcasting of those media entities presenting their interpretation of
their constructs. Nothing more.
too much on polls doesn't serve public. Every major broadcast and cable network, and many major newspapers,
feel compelled to sponsor their own political polls. But the polling conducted today by news outlets and universities
does little to serve the public interest. The polls do, however, serve the branding and marketing interests of the
sponsoring organizations. That financial motivation drives the polling frenzy more than any sense of civic duty.
When CNN, Fox News or NBC releases periodic poll results, the news channels benefit from having those results reported across
the journalistic world, raising the profile of the respective news outlets. Polls provide journalists with something to
report about, fill time and endlessly analyze. That's easier for news organizations than covering issues and providing
election news of substance. Such "horse race" coverage diminishes the process of democracy to the level of a sporting event.
Obliterates Clinton's Lead In Latest Reuters Poll. U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton leads
her Republican rival Donald Trump by 5 percentage points among likely voters, down from a peak this month of 12 points,
according to the Reuters/Ipsos daily tracking poll released on Friday [8/26/2016].
University Pollster Patrick Murray Busted Manipulating Poll Data, then Lying About It. By now most CTH readers
are familiar with the more notoriously biased polling manipulators. One of those is Patrick Murray from Monmouth
University. [...] Today [8/22/2016], Monmouth via Patrick Murray presents a presidential poll of Ohio voters. The
actual raw data showed Donald Trump with a lead in the result; however, Murray changed the data through weighting to
show Hillary Clinton with a lead.
News Deletes Poll Story Crediting Trump for 5+ Point Lead in Pennsylvania. True Pundit is issuing an Amber
Alert for a missing CBS News story. The story was short, weighed very positive for Donald Trump, was last seen at a CBS
affiliate website, and vanished early Monday morning [8/22/2016], approximately 3 am EST. Voters with any information on
this story's whereabouts are encouraged to be quiet and act like nothing happened, just like CBS who is refusing to comment
on our questions of what happened to the Trump poll story. I mean, if the poll showed Hillary Clinton leading by +5
chances are there wouldn't be a story on a missing story.
lead over Trump shrinks to margin-of-error: Bloomberg poll. Is Hillary Clinton squashing Donald Trump
into oblivion in the polls? Or is her lead over him perilously shrinking? One thing we know is: there are
countless ways to spin a poll. Consider the case of selective reporting on the most recent Bloomberg national
poll. On Aug. 10, Bloomberg reported "Clinton up 6 on Trump in Two Way Race." But looking at the
actual poll, Trump has moved so close to Clinton, the results are within the margin of error.
Photoshops Crowd Image For Hillary Clinton St. Petersburg, Florida Speech. A couple of hundred people
showed up [door count puts the number at 171] within a St. Petersburg venue capable of holding in excess of 4,000
without seating. But the media, well, in the land of make believe, they just can't help but manufacture the optics
because the same media are selling an entirely different story with their polling.
Caddell on 'Cooked' Reuters Poll: 'Never in My Life Have I Seen a News Organization Do Something So Dishonest'.
On Sunday's Breitbart News Daily with SiriusXM host Alex Marlow, political strategist Pat Caddell outlined his charge that
Reuters tampered with its own daily tracking poll to manufacture a sudden surge for Hillary Clinton. "They not only
changed their formula, to put Hillary ahead. They went back and changed the results, for a week of results where Trump
was ahead, and then they turned those into Hillary leads," said Caddell. "They also erased all the former polling off
the site. They didn't tweak their procedure — they cooked it."
Carolina Poll — Donald Trump Gains 32% of Black Voters — Leads 46/42 Overall. A post convention scientific (non media)
poll of North Carolina voters from The Civitas Institute shows candidate Donald Trump with a 46/42 lead over Hillary Clinton. Also, in what is
becoming an increasing concern for the Clinton campaign team — the demographics (crosstabs) of the poll show Trump is capturing 32% of the black
Polls Signal Deep Trouble for Republican Nominee. A raft of new national and battleground-state polls released
Thursday found Donald Trump slipping well behind Hillary Clinton one week after the end of the Democratic convention, and as
the Republican nominee reels from a public feud with the parents of a slain Muslim American soldier. "There has clearly
been a significant movement toward Clinton in the last week," said Ken Goldstein, a professor of politics at the University
of San Francisco and polling analyst for Bloomberg Politics. "Some of it is a Clinton post-convention bounce, but more
of it seems to be a Trump deflation or implosion."
Political: The 2016 Race Is Not Over. [Scroll down] Another thing we know: the push polls, the
agenda-driven media, and the exhortations of the Beltway insiders on both sides of the aisle are completely ignored by the dirt
people in flyover country. Just as Brexit caught the world's foremost economics "experts" and pollsters by surprise,
so too could America's serfs rebel against everything K Street and Wall Street are trying to sell them.
Pat Caddell Blasts Reuters' Back-Rigging Polls to Show Clinton Winning. Speaking exclusively to Breitbart News,
political polling pioneer Pat Caddell said the Reuters news service was guilty of an unprecedented act of professional
malpractice after it announced Friday it has dropped the "Neither" option from their presidential campaign tracking polls and
then went back and reconfigured previously released polls to present different results with a reinterpretation of the
"Neither" responses in those polls. "This comes as close as I have ever seen to cooking the results," said the
legendary pollster and political consultant. "I suppose you can get away with it in polling because there are no
laws. But, if this was accounting, they would put them in jail."
Percent Positive Response to Donald Trump Speech — So CNN Trashes Its Own Poll. Donald Trump won the
Republican nomination for president in Cleveland during a momentous week in political history. On Thursday night
[7/21/2016], Trump gave a one-hour-and-fifteen-minute speech accepting the Republican nomination. The speech was so
overwhelmingly well-received among the crowd that the media did not know what to do to tear it apart.
Polls or Propaganda? An opinion poll is a survey of public opinion from a particular sample, designed to
represent the opinion of a larger population group. The key word here is 'sample'. Suppose you want to conduct a survey
on gun rights. How might the results differ if you sample attendees at a Wyoming gun show versus a meeting of the
Ithaca Code Pink chapter? Presidential polls are no different. The sample determines the poll results. Ask
a group of Americans who they prefer for president in November. Who exactly is being asked?
polls were not biased before the 2012 election, but they are now. It is Donald J. Trump versus the world, and
this makes the current round of polling different from previous elections. Trump has certainly attracted the anger of
Democrats, but many in the GOP establishment dislike him as much as — if not more than — their
Democratic opponents. And for this reason, we must be far more cautious in how the polling data is interpreted.
The GOP establishment (GOPe) — and its media outreach team at places such as National Review, the Wall Street
Journal, etc. — is angling for influence with Trump, and its primary means of running this influence operation is
by attempting to show that Trump's message and approach are failing with the public, and thus, he needs the GOPe in order to
avoid an election apocalypse.
for massive liberal bias in Ipsos polling of the Trump vs. Clinton match-up. Stepping out of reality into
the rapidly expanding landfill of polling data biased against Donald Trump reveals what a disaster is taking place when it
comes to surveying the public's actual opinion — rather than the desired liberal narrative — about the
2016 general election. [...] The proverbial "tell" in these types of data sets is how respondents answered the question
regarding their presidential vote in 2012. If the poll is representative of the public, the relative percentages of Obama
2012 versus Romney 2012 voters surveyed should approximate — within reason — how the state in question
actually voted in 2012. But if there are significant deviations between the poll's composition and the 2012 results, the
cause either needs to be fully explained by the pollster, or we default to the assumption of a bias.
correcting for bias, Clinton's national lead in CBS News poll evaporates. CBS News is now pushing the
pro-Hillary Clinton polls in rapid fashion. Late on Wednesday, this media outlet released the results of a national
poll claiming to show that Clinton holds a 6% advantage over Donald Trump in the direct head-to-head matchup. [... But] this
CBS News poll appears to be biased in favor of the Democrats by the same margin that Clinton purportedly holds over Trump,
meaning that if the bias is removed, so is Clinton's lead, and we have a statistical tie.
It Ain't Over Yet.
More than at any period before 2008, polling data has become the main barometer for determining the public's political
leanings and from the beginning Trump has been leading here. The question is, of course, how accurate are these polls?
Are only Republicans being polled or is the general public? Who's paying for the polls? What questions are being asked
by the pollsters? Can this data be manipulated by the media? Of course it can.
Tries Really, Really Hard To Make GOP Seem Racist. A newly-released poll conducted by Democrat-aligned Public Policy Polling
(PPP) appears to have been deliberately designed to ferret out any possible racism among South Carolina's Republican voters. But the
attempt largely seems to have failed. The poll released Tuesday [2/16/2016] asks 33 questions, and most of them are basic for
just about any poll regarding presidential primaries. Likely Republican primary voters were asked which GOP candidate they favored,
how firm they were in their choice, how they viewed each candidate, and so forth. But along with the normal questions were nine
that dealt with religious or racial matters.
Frank Luntz Admits To Conflict of Interest With Rubio. Pollster Frank Luntz acknowledges that he took money to help shape Sen. Marco
Rubio (R-FL)'s political career, a fact that he did not disclose while praising Rubio on Fox News and on social media. [...] Luntz admitted to
Breitbart News that he once accepted payment to work for Rubio. "Yeah, nine years ago," Luntz admitted. "Nine years ago."
Luntz defended the supposed impartiality of his post-debate focus groups.
Poll Numbers May Be Vastly Inflated Due to Reality Show Name Recognition. Two-and-one-half months before last
week's Iowa Caucus, columnist S.A. Miller of The Washington Times noted what could be called "The Trump Effect" on
poll numbers with an article entitled "Donald Trump seen unlikely to win in Iowa despite poll numbers": [...] The critical
question that Miller and others have raised is the possibility that some poll respondents choose Trump based not upon policy
positions but because they recognize his name. In my non-scientific discussions with various registered voters, I have
discovered a rather significant percentage who are unfamiliar with the name of any GOP candidate, except for that of
Biggest Loser? The Polls. Again. If you recall, the polls blew the mid-term elections in 2014, the polls really
blew the highly-publicized Virginia Senate race, the polls in Israel greatly under-estimated Benjamin Netanyahu's most recent
victory, the polls completely whiffed on the conservative win in Britain, and now the polls have blown the Iowa Caucus.
On the GOP side, every recent poll out of Iowa showed Trump as the victor. In the Real Clear Politics poll of polls,
Trump was up by an average of +4.7 points.
Reminds Stephanopoulos of His History as Dem 'Operative'. An annoyed [Chris] Christie retorted, "I know that as a former operative, you're obsessed
with the polls. I know you are. But I also know that when you working for Bill Clinton in 1992, everybody told him the night before the New Hampshire
primary, he was going to be in single digits and was finished." He continued, "And the next day, he came in second place and his campaign went on to win the
Can We Shoot All the Pollsters
Now? Metaphorically speaking, of course, but in 2010, 2012, 2014, 2015, and now 2016 the pollsters have steered
political press coverage. And in each of those years, the pollsters have seriously screwed up and gotten things wrong.
Again today in Iowa, networks poured in resources based on polls and newspapers set coverage based on polls. Ted Cruz smashed the
record for votes in an Iowa Caucus, beating the 2008 Mike Huckabee win, with a traditional ground game. But the polling missed
it. The polling missed it big time. Establishment Republicans as well fed a narrative to the media that was wrong.
Turnout was over 180,000, and pundits all said that would mean Donald Trump would win. He did not. Time and time again,
the talking heads got it wrong.
Ten Percent of College-Grad Men Hide Support For Trump From Interviewers. [Donald] Trump consistently gets a
whopping 6 percent more supporters in online polls than in traditional telephone-polls — and that's a big margin
in a race with a dozen contenders. This discrepancy between online and live interview polls has baffled survey experts,
because online polls have become quite accurate since previous presidential elections. A new study detected a possible
reason for the 6 percent difference: college-graduate men are apparently reluctant to tell phone interviewers that
they like Trump, but are more comfortable revealing their opinions via online polls.
How Polls Manipulate Voters, No Matter The
Results. A new Indianapolis Star poll, conducted with Ball State University, shows 50.2 percent of people in Indiana
support providing special nondiscrimination protections based on sexual orientation and gender identity in Indiana's laws. Reportedly, only
35.1 percent are opposed. That is par for the course on LGBTQ issues, but vote results consistently invalidate such polls, which raises
the question: Is the purpose of polling data to convey the views of a representative sample or to engage in marketing tactics to sway views?
Can We Have a Word About the Polls? Everyone
today [12/14/2015] is freaking out about a poll from Monmouth University that purports to show Donald Trump getting 41% of the Republican vote.
There's a lot to note about exactly how garbage this poll is. It is so bad that Monmouth's own polling director is basically disavowing it.
If you are interested in a relatively robust writeup of the methodological problems with the poll itself, which are primarily driven by the insane
method Monmouth used to select their sample, you can check this Politico writeup [elsew]here.
Promotes Agenda Driven Poll Result — AND, Yet Again, Hides The Data. Against an increasingly obvious
level of support for a common sense freeze on Muslim immigration the progressive apparatchik within the bowels of NBC/WSJ
rush to the typeset to deflect the damage. We've written extensively before about pollster Mark Murray, NBC, and their
agenda-polling promotion, so there's no reason to re-hash that again. However, the latest attempt is so far beyond absurd
the light from where absurd emanates won't catch it for a year.
Buy Trump's Big Lead. When you examine the poll, which was taken from Nov. 27 through Dec. 1, 2015 (which was a
holiday weekend and is problematical all by itself in terms of who the respondents were), it is clear that the pollsters chose to ask
five questions on the topic of illegal immigration prior to asking about the Republican nomination horserace. This is a bad
polling practice that can skew the results.
The Obama Polling Disconnect.
There continues to be, in short, a gap between opinions about Obama's job performance and feelings about the country's direction. This
essay seeks to determine why nearly half of American adults frequently tell a pollster they approve of the job Obama is doing as president,
but only about a quarter opine that the nation is headed in the right direction.
Front-Runner Fallacy. Early U.S. presidential polls have tended to be wildly off-target. There's
no reason to think this time is different.
poisoned the political well. Has political polling reached the end of the line? While some won't find it as
terribly shocking anymore, the polls in Kentucky which had previously been considered among the most reliable missed the
Bevin win in the governor's race by a wide margin. This wasn't the first time either.
Data Point to be Ignored. Matt Bevin won Kentucky by EIGHT points. It was not even close. Every poll had it
very close and many predicted the Democrats would win. Kentucky is not alone. Throughout the nation, polling has been
incredibly flawed. [In addition], it has been flawed internationally. Look at the British election last year where
no one saw the Tories getting an outright majority, which they did. The polling was flawed in 2014. It was flawed
in 2012. It was flawed in 2010. Kentucky is just the latest example. But even though we have another data point
that the polling is flawed, the media is going to continue to shape its political coverage based on the polling. The debate
stages will still be set using polling.
Three Pinocchios: Clinton's
claim that 40 percent of guns are sold at gun shows and over the Internet. So where does the 40 percent figure
come from? It is derived from studies that were based on data collected from a survey in 1994, the same year that the Brady
Act requirements for background checks came into effect. In fact, the questions concerned purchases dating as far back as
1991, and the Brady Act went into effect in early 1994 — meaning that some, if not many, of the guns were bought
in a pre-Brady environment. The survey sample was relatively small — just 251 people. (The survey was
done by telephone, using a random-digit-dial method, with a response rate of 50 percent.)
Biggest Scam of the 2016 Election. Let's go ahead and state this right up front, because there's no other way
to spin this. Either the media and the Republican National Committee charged with overseeing the debate participation
criteria are guilty of a negligence bordering on malfeasance, or they are conspiring together to gerrymander the outcome of
the 2016 nomination. How else do you explain the systemically flawed process of permitting public opinion polls, with
questionable accuracy, to determine which candidates in a crowded field get access to a debate stage with over 20 million
potential voters watching? As well as how the air-time is doled out for those candidates who do qualify?
the election revolution has arrived. A political revolution is taking place in America. The process of
selecting party presidential candidates has been transformed in the last two or three election cycles. Now we have the
early debates designed to drive poll numbers and tell us who's "ahead" and who's "behind," who's "gaining" and who's "dropping."
Yet not a single vote has been taken, not a single voter has pulled a lever in a voting booth or gone to a single caucus.
And yet candidates are being winnowed out. Take, for example, Scott Walker of Wisconsin. Is he out because he couldn't
get any voters to vote for him? No, few voters have even bothered to focus on the race thus far with any intensity, much less
actually vote. It's because his debate performances proved lackluster, which sent his poll numbers down, which led to a sharp
decline in his ability to raise money. He lost in a contest that was extra-electoral.
Neutral Federal Report Stacks The Deck Against Marijuana Legalization. In 2012 Coloradans approved Amendment
64, which legalized marijuana for recreational use, by a vote of 55 percent to 45 percent. Last February a Quinnipiac
University poll found that 58 percent of Colorado voters supported that decision, while 38 percent opposed it and the rest
weren't sure. For prohibitionists determined to portray marijuana legalization in Colorado as a disaster, those poll
results are inconvenient, since they indicate that public support for Amendment 64 was higher after more than a year of legal
recreational sales and more than two years of legal possession and home cultivation than it was in 2012. Honest drug warriors
would acknowledge the Quinnipiac numbers and perhaps try to balance them with other poll results. Dishonest drug warriors
would do what the Rocky Mountain High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (RMHIDTA) does in its new report on marijuana legalization:
change the numbers.
is CNN Hiding Its Poll Showing Deep Distrust on Iran Deal? CNN did a poll on the Iran deal from September 4 to 8.
On Sunday morning [9/13/2015], CNN pollster Jennifer Agiesta (formerly of The Washington Post) reported the results — another
poll showing deep skepticism about Iran, and the prospect that Iran will cheat on any nuclear deal. Obama has a bad disapproval rating on
Iran. You'd never know this from all the "major victory for Obama" talk on this deal.
Rigging the Elections. Does anybody really look into
who's behind those ubiquitous yet influential polls? It's a no-brainer to insist that we 'follow the money.' Who is funding the
various polls? Who and where are they polling? the general electorate or registered Republicans? What questions are being
asked? I've never been polled. Have you?
straw poll; you were fun but frivolous. The Iowa Republican Party pulled the plug on
the Iowa Straw Poll on Friday, but the party's official action merely confirmed the obvious:
The quadrennial caucus event was effectively brain dead.
No Proof Americans Want The Supreme Court To Save Obamacare. According to a new [Washington Post]-ABC
News poll, Americans oppose the Democrats' health-care insurance reform, 54 to 39 percent. Yet, by a
margin of 55-38 percent, more people say the court should not take action to block federal subsidies in states
that didn't set up own exchanges. This led the Michael Hiltziks of the world to declare that "Americans want to save
Obamacare." This seems like a contradictory message — until you discover how WaPo frames the question: [...]
Republicans In Congress Cook Up Phony Poll-Tested Talking Points To Push Obama Trade Deal.
[Scroll down] A deeper dive into this particular poll, however, shows that the results obtained depend
on the wording of the questions asked. Neither Hughes' article nor Amenabear's article printed the actual
question that was asked of respondents to get the still unimpressive 37 percent. So to find it,
anyone interested in knowing the full context of this data would need to go behind a paywall at the Wall
Street Journal to get the full polling data.
Support Nuclear Deal With Iran? Presumably, hardly any of those telephoned by the
pollsters realized that the objective of the agreement, assuming that Iran abides by it —
a laughable assumption — is to extend the time it will take Iran to build a bomb to one
year. Even assuming that objective could be achieved, which most experts do not believe, it would be
a small payoff for ending sanctions, which will entrench the mullahs' regime and increase the resources they
can devote to nuclear enrichment and ICBM development, which will not be addressed in the prospective deal.
of Netanyahu's Racism. Netanyahu's election comment about Arabs being bused in to vote
has been seized on as a useful excuse to explain how the media's poll numbers that showed Netanyahu
losing align with the actual results by claiming that a rash of racist Israelis rushed to vote. But
that fails to explain why the exit polls were still badly wrong. A more realistic explanation is
that the media's polling was biased against Netanyahu. But it's easier for the media to accuse
Netanyahu of racism than admit to its own biases.
Polls That Favor Jeb Bush. Jeb Bush is polling as the man to beat in 2016, and it's
completely absurd. Most people outside of Florida have little idea what Jeb Bush has done in office
and even fewer voters know what he plans to propose or the direction he seeks for the Republican Party.
But in poll after poll, John Ellis Bush (J.E.B.), the privileged son of President G.H.W. Bush, brother
of President G.W. Bush and grandson of a banker and Rockefeller-type Republican senator from Connecticut,
Prescott Bush, is leading the list of Republican nomination contenders by a wide margin. So far though,
he's the only one who has announced his desire to run for the office.
Republican Wave Drowns Pollsters.
Despite all of their supposed science, improved methodologies, and sophisticated turnout models, the
nation's pollsters have just suffered through their worst midterm elections drubbing in 20 years.
The last time they were off this badly was when they woefully underestimated Republican gains in the
Newt Gingrich "Contract with America" midterms of 1994. In this year's U.S. Senate races,
preelection "tossup" predictions really meant "comfortable Republican wins" in three instances —
Georgia, Iowa and Kansas, where Republican victory margins were eight, nine, and 11 points, respectively.
the media, seduced by the polls, were stunned by huge Democratic defeat. It's clear
now that most prognosticators underestimated the depth of the Republican triumph in the midterms by
slavishly hewing to the polls, some of which were wildly off the mark. But as one Republican
after another declared victory, there was another aspect to the coverage that struck me: The
focus remained solidly on the Democrats and why they had so badly blown the election.
results looked nothing like the polls — what gives? Tuesday's midterm elections were
supposed to be a night of nail-biters, from Sen. Mitch McConnell's re-election race in Kentucky to
veteran Sen. Pat Roberts' battle in Kansas. The too-close-to-call refrain was expected to be heard
throughout the night. Instead, when the dust settled, Republicans rumbled to one of their biggest
victories in decades. How could so many polls get so many races so wrong?
Some polls seem to have transmogrified into pre-election partisan tools, given that a few Senate
races and lots of governorships weren't even close to supposedly scientific predictions.
did pollsters miss the Republican tsunami? Republicans out-performed their poll
numbers in race after race Tuesday [11/4/2014], raising questions about pro-Democratic bias in this
year's election's polls — a major turnaround from the pro-GOP bias in 2012's polls. The
series of misses caused at least one political forecaster — Larry Sabato of the widely
read Center for Politics' Crystal Ball — to call for changes to the industry Wednesday.
Sabato said on Fox News that he wanted an investigation of polls in Virginia that showed a double-digit
lead for Democratic Sen. Mark Warner — who wound up winning re-election by less than a point.
Polls Were Skewed, All Right — in Favor of Democrats. As the 2014 midterm election wound to a close,
left-wing pundits repeated the error of their conservative rivals in 2012, claiming that the polls forecasting doom were
skewed. It turns out that they were right — but in entirely the wrong direction. As fivethirtyeight's
numbers guru Nate Silver noted after midnight Wednesday [11/5/2014], the polls were skewed, on average, six points in favor
of Democrats in the key Senate races where Republicans romped.
It As Close As That? For most of 2012, I maintained that Mitt Romney would lose to
Barack Obama. Only after President Obama's first debate did there seem to be a glimmer of hope.
After that debate, polling moved in Romney's direction. Conservatives had hope. As we now know,
much of the polling in 2012 was wrong. There were some great pollsters. The IBD/TIPP poll, the
Reuters/Ipsos poll, the Pew Poll, and others were spot on. But many pollsters, including the most
prominent pollster of all, Gallup, were left with black eyes.
Colorado Polls Underestimating Democratic Turnout? Is it possible that pollsters are
underestimating the size and composition of Colorado's electorate in the upcoming Nov. 4 —
given that the state now mails ballots to its voters? Democrats seeing incumbent Sen. Mark Udall,
D-Colo., trailing in most public polls to Republican Cory Gardner certainly hope that's the case.
The political community has adopted polling averages or medians to correct somewhat for misleading
surveys, and these averages are made widely available by websites such as Real Clear Politics and
HuffPost Pollster, among others. These aggregations are particularly useful when a new survey
is released with results that buck the general polling trend in a race.
Poll: Americans Oppose Obamacare's HHS Mandate 53% to 43%. A new poll released Thursday [5/8/2014] shows
that Americans oppose Obamacare's HHS mandate — the rule requiring "free" coverage of contraception,
sterilizations, and the "week-after" pill that may kill human embryos — by a 10-point margin.
Polling on this issue has varied widely, depending on how pollsters frame the question.
The Polls Driving GOP Surrender Are
Unscientific Garbage. [Scroll down] Conservatives should outnumber liberals by almost two-to-one, but the poll has the ratio at
34:23. And people who claim not to have health insurance or health care coverage, which should be under 10% unless illegal aliens are included,
constitute a whopping 16%. Demographers might argue over these ratios, but as far as I can tell every case of apparent oversampling/undersampling
favors the liberal or Democratic side. Honest errors would tend to be more evenly distributed and would balance each other out.
PPP sat on poll showing Colorado recall strength.
I'll have to defer to pollsters as to whether this is consistent with professional polling protocol. PPP has admitted that it deliberately did not release a poll
showing that Colorado State Senator Angela Giron was likely to lose the recall election by a wide margin.
Post Mortem Leads To Polling Changes. Nearly seven months after President Obama won reelection by a margin of
4 percentage points, the Gallup Organization, the world's best-known polling firm, identified in a new report four main reasons
why their 2012 surveys badly understated Obama's support.
U.S. Main stream
media duped on global warming polls. In the past two weeks many U.S. media gave supportive coverage to two public opinion
polls about global warming. However, reporters were duped. The surveys released on October 9th and 18th by the
Yale Project on Climate Change Communication and the George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communication were hopelessly
biased. They therefore cannot be meaningful measures of American public opinion.
Ready? Fire Ames! Iowa governor Terry Branstad, a Republican, has
suggested that the days of the Ames straw poll — the Midwest summer spectacle that takes the temperature of an idiosyncratic slice of the Republican party months
before the first binding primaries — might be numbered. "I think the straw poll has outlived its usefulness," Branstad told the Wall Street Journal.
PPP's polls were rigged all along.
New York Magazine was trying to be sympathetic to the popular polling figures on its own side of the political, but let out a secret in the
process: Public Policy Polling cooked the books all along.
A 59% pro-abortion turnout? I don't think so!
Remember that the exit poll methodology changed drastically this year: they only polled in 31 states. Of the 19 states
(plus D.C.) that were dropped, there were three tiny 2008 Obama states (plus D.C.) with a total of 14 electoral votes between them, and
the other sixteen were huge McCain 2008 states with 24% of the nation's population and 149 electoral votes, including Texas, Georgia, and
Tennessee. So, the "exit polls" weighted their sample by excluding 1/4 of the electorate. More importantly, these polls
explicitly exclude a cherry-picked, heavily Republican, pro-life-leaning 24%.
Fear and Loathing in Ohio. [Scroll down] One recent
poll, showing Obama ahead by 6 points, had a survey sample composed of 38 percent Democrats and 29 percent Republicans —
a D+9 oversample that actually exceeds the Democrat advantage in partisan ID reported by 2008 exit polls, when Ohio went to Obama by a 5-point margin,
52-47, over John McCain. Such implausible oversampling of Democrats has become routine in polls this year.
It's Now Public: Editors Rejigger Polls.
The leading objection raised this year is to polls whose findings suggest a more Democratic turnout in states than is likely to be the case. [...] A
stunning tale today in the Salt Lake Tribune, however, reveals the dirty little secret of polls paid for by the media. The results are,
in effect, owned by the media, and the media can insist that they be rejiggered.
A stunning admission on polling.
A significant section of America has chosen to disconnect from the media bubble. They no longer buy newspapers or magazines. They
seldom watch network TV, especially the network news shows. [...] I suspect these people started to associate polling firms with their media
clients some years back. Now they just hang up on pollsters the same way they have turned their back to the media and entertainment industry.
Election Predictions from PJ Media Columnists.
For almost all of President Obama's term, polling has been more a media device to shape public opinion than a dispassionate barometer to report
public opinion — reporting as "mainstream" the perceptions and programs of skewed samples.
latest poll deconstructed. So, if Romney has 99 percent of the Republican vote, 5 percent of the Democratic
vote (Obama comparably having only 1 percent of the Republican vote) and is ahead of Obama by a very impressive 22 percent
among Independents, how can the race be tied?
Exit Polls Are Bunk; Ignore Them.
Take my advice and ignore exit polls. Wait for real results. Exit polls are media outlets or people they hire standing outside a polling
place and asking people upon leaving who they voted for.
The Polls Are Wrong: Electorate is
R+6. While every single poll on the planet predicts Democrats will enjoy a turnout advantage of three to eleven points, the latest
Rasmussen survey of party affiliation taken throughout October shows that Republicans enjoy a huge 5.8% Party ID advantage going into the 2012
Romney Gains 3 to Tie Obama in CNN's
D+11 Poll. [Scroll down] Yet there is something odd — and even ridiculous — in the poll's sample:
of the 693 likely voters in the total sample of 1,010 adults polled, "41% described themselves as Democrats, 29% described themselves as
Independents, and 30% described themselves as Republicans." In other words, the poll is a D+11 outlier.
After This Election,
Does PBS Deserve Public Funding? Based on the reporting of several of its major contributors, one has to question PBS's objectivity
during the current election. On Oct. 25, PBS highlighted a TIME poll showing Obama leading Romney 49% to 45% in the key battleground
state of Ohio. Just four days later, the Cincinnati Enquirer showed the race tied, while the Rasmussen poll showed Romney ahead
by 2 points. On what basis did PBS select the TIME poll for its report?
Uncritically, Media Accepts Misleading Global Warming Poll.
Conducting surveys that measure real public opinion about global warming is difficult. Because the hypothesis that humanity is causing dangerous warming is now
loudly supported by most opinion leaders — media, educators, and government — and alternative viewpoints are condemned, most citizens are reluctant
to express skepticism about the issue despite what they actually think. The public will often give answers contrary to their opinions so as to conform to what they
believe is socially acceptable concerning issues on which the politically correct position is clear.
D+7 PPP Iowa Poll: Obama
Leading by One. Public Policy Polling (PPP), the liberal polling outfit, conducted a D+7 poll this weekend that found
President Barack Obama with a one-point lead over Mitt Romney (49%-48%) in Iowa. Romney led by 8 points among independents.
On Friday [10/19/2012], PPP released an R+4 poll that had Romney leading by one, which means after an 11-point swing in its sample, Obama
only gained 2 points in Iowa.
Investors' Business Daily Struggles to Prop
Up Obama in Polls. A walk through the RealClearPolitics average of polls is an exploration of parallel universes. This morning,
the overall RCP average shows a tied race between Obama and Romney. While this itself is an ominous sign for Obama's chances at reelection,
his actual standing is likely far weaker. Propping him up are a gaggle of polls, led by Investors' Business Daily, that are clinging
to fantasies about Democrat turnout.
Obama senior adviser questions polls. "With all due respect to USA Today, they're
running this flawed poll that has us tied with women, which is an impossibility," [David] Plouffe said, before turning to Gallup.
"Gallup has a terrible likely voter screen," he said. "Gallup's been erratic all year. Even when it's benefited us it's been
way too high. By the way, there's not that much movement. There's very few undecided voters. The USA Today
thing ... they probably had a too-conservative skew amongst women voters."
Soledad O'Brien: Obama 'up 15' in
Virginia. This morning [10/18/2012], CNN's Soledad O'Brien told Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell "pre-debate polling
shows that the president was up 15 points in the state of Virginia." But O'Brien did not mention what the CNN Chyron, on
the bottom of the screen, did: The +15 points was among female voters, based on a Quinnipiac poll that had Obama
leading Romney by 16 points (56-40) among women.
Obama camp attacks Gallup again. President Obama's
campaign once again attacked the methodology of Gallup just days after the polling group adjusted their methodology in a way that benefited the president.
Presidential Polls Should Be Trashed, Not Published. With the public and the pundits hungry for more information about the election,
the focus on polling seems to be greater than ever. Unfortunately for the pollsters, so has skepticism about their results. Part of
that lies in the natural unwillingness of partisans to accept that their side is losing. Thus, Republicans take polls that show their side
winning as truthful while scoffing at those that show Democrats ahead; Democrats play the same game.
WashPost Buries Its Tilted Sample,
GOP 'Zeal' for Romney on A-4. It's always wise to look inside the paper for the real news when The Washington Post reports on improving
polls for Republicans. The headline in Monday's [10/15/2012] paper is "GOP's zeal for Romney grows," but adds underneath "Race is still close after 1st
debate; Poll shows little change among likely voters." [...] Only inside do you learn about how enthusiasm now for Mitt Romney doubles John McCain's at this
point in 2008, and that the "virtual dead heat" touted in the first paragraph is matched in paragraph 17 with a 9-point Democrat sampling push.
WaPo Packs Dems Into Poll to Lift Obama.
This morning [10/15/2012], Washington Post & ABC released their latest poll of the presidential race. Naturally, they find Obama leading
Romney by 3 points, 49-46. This is similar to their last poll, which found Obama leading by 2, 49-47. Similar, but very, very
different. Their last poll had a D+3 sample. Today, though, to keep Obama where he was, they had to juice the sample to D+9.
Daily Kos/SEIU Poll: Romney Beats Obama 50-46.
The left-leaning Public Policy Polling does regular weekly polling for the extreme left-leaning Daily Kos and SEIU, and the numbers this morning have probably
stopped the hearts of leftists everywhere.
The Editor says...
Something tells me this poll is part of an effort to re-energize the disillusioned Democrat base.
Won't Survive Another Four Years of Obama. The Pew Institute's bombshell survey released this week
showed that the number of Americans not affiliated with any religion rose from 15% in 2007 to almost 20% in 2011,
and that the unaffiliated are much likelier to vote Democratic (63% of unaffiliated lean Democratic vs. 48% of all
registered voters). This prompted rejoicing in the liberal camp.
Irreligious people on the
rise? Or just suspicious polling practices? Once again, the Pew Foundation has brought forth a report on religion in America. In
the past they claimed that atheists know more about religion than religious people do, a conclusion not supported by their data. This time the
media headlines based on Pew's latest survey declare that the number of people with no religion is dramatically increasing. The way the survey
is being pitched by the media is that America is becoming less religious.
Five Reasons There Are Bad Polls.
This morning, CBS and the New York Times announced excitedly that their new swing-state poll (conducted by Quinnipiac University) in
Ohio, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey showed a substantial margin for Barack Obama in all three. The problem: The poll's
results are preposterous. We know this not because it shows Obama leading but because its "internals" are hilariously out of
whack in relation to vote totals in 2008 and 2010.
Propaganda poll shows Obama
ahead. These results are as valuable as the media that sponsored them. It is a shame that Quinnipiac,
which was once respected, has thrown in with the propagandists.
Romney Tied in CO; Obama Underperforming. [Scroll down] Another poll released on Thursday [9/13/2012] had Obama leading
by five points, but mainstream outlets, unlike local news organizations in Denver, failed to mention that the poll was conducted by a public
affairs firm run by Democratic operatives who ran the campaigns of Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper and Sen. Mark Udall, both of whom are
How 'The Shy Republican' Could Be Masking a
Landslide. At time of writing, polls show the race for the presidency to be tight. [...] Yet to many, especially those of us on the right,
it seems peculiar that Obama is still remotely in the race. With high unemployment, minimal GDP growth, a 100% increase in food stamp costs, and
out-of-control spending, many conservatives are asking how just under half of the American population can possibly want more of the same.
Washington Post Cooks
Swing-State Poll For Obama. My colleague, John Nolte, has already covered how absurd the Washington Post poll of voters in
"swing states" was. For the last few months, I have become convinced that the media is actively trying to use their polls to impact the
Presidential election. Not the pollsters per se, but the media sponsors who pay their tab. They are active participants in the
campaign. The Washington Post confirmed that my suspicions were correct. They are totally an in-kind contributor to the Obama
A pollster under oath.
In May, the pollster for Al Gore's presidential bid in 2000 and John Edwards's in 2004 and 2008, Harrison Hickman, took the stand in the
federal criminal case against Edwards over alleged campaign finance violations stemming from payments to support Edwards's mistress.
Under oath, Hickman admitted that in the final weeks of Edwards's 2008 bid, Hickman cherry-picked public polls to make the candidate seem
viable, promoted surveys that Hickman considered unreliable, and sent e-mails to campaign aides, Edwards supporters and reporters which argued
that the former senator was still in the hunt — even though Hickman had already told Edwards privately that he had no real chance
of winning the Democratic nomination.
We are the 91%. The most important unnoted characteristic of
telephone polls (on which most of the political journalism these days seems focused — instead of on the economy) is that 91% of people refuse
to participate in them. In other words, only 9% of the population is being heard in the polls.
Rigging the polls. Major election surveys in the last
few months have shown Mr. Obama either in the lead or tied for the win, despite an economic record of massive unemployment and astronomical debt.
With that kind of baggage, the current Oval Office occupant ought to be trailing by at least 10 points. The disconnect between data and
reality has spurred increasing analysis of the polls and polling methods generally.
Can the Democratic Psyops Boost Obama?
If it doesn't pass the smell test, it is probably not true. We keep being told that Obama is leading, that the race is close at best, that voters
have accepted a 'new normal' for unemployment, that the economy is improving, that the price of gas means nothing, that Romney is making fatal gaffes.
We were even told that the 9/11 attacks which left our ambassador to Libya dead made Romney look bad. Every week is a good week for Obama and
a bad week for Romney according to the media. Now we're told that this week's polls are showing Obama creaming Romney in the swing states.
Skewed polls indicate Obama's in
trouble — not Romney. Certain media polls indicating Obama is ahead of Mitt Romney by as much as 10 to 12 points in swing
states seem to spell disaster for Romney, but what they really say about the Obama campaign may just surprise you[.] The absurdity of the skewed
sample models in those polls is one thing, but what conservatives need to understand is that polls skewed to heavily favor Democrats logically point to
one very important fact — Obama is in big trouble.
Is there a Republican landslide coming
in November? It would be an election night to remember for Republicans and conservatives if the Romney/Ryan presidential ticket wins in a
landslide, but nothing short of shock and awe for Democrats and their liberal media allies based on the latest polls. Quick to sweep the historic
Republican election landslide in 2010 and Scott Walker's big victory in Wisconsin's recall election under the rug, Democrats and the liberal media have
been treating Obama's dismal record on the economy and foreign policy the same way they treated those elections — like they never happened.
Buries Obama's Tanking Poll Numbers. Did you know that this debate we've been having around abortion,
contraception and other health care issues is hurting the GOP? You may not know it, unless you read the New
York Times. ... They buried Obama's falling poll numbers, while insisting the debate must be hurting the GOP,
because that's what they wanted and thought it would do.
CBS: Obama Leads in Our D+13 Poll.
Virtually every [media poll] uses a polling sample that is so heavily-skewed towards Democrats that it distorts the actual state of the campaign.
Of course, that is a feature, not a bug of the polls. The polls are specifically designed to drive a narrative that Obama is surging and
Romney is struggling. [...] This election, it isn't so much about polling as propaganda. The polls are simply a tool being used by the media to
try to depress GOP turnout and give a powerful lift to Obama's obviously lackluster campaign. The polls confirm that the media aren't really
biased. Rather, they are active players for the other team.
Obama Media begin the Faking of Obama Poll Numbers.
In order to sway the vast majority and growing number of Americans who have finally faced up to the fact that Obama is purposefully
trying to destroy the United States of America, the Obama Media have begun their side of the Obama syndicate's overall
strategy of lying to us. Polls now show 50% of voters would vote for Obama. Intelligent people —
even those few on the Left — know this is a lie.
Is the Liberal Press
Shooting Itself In the Foot? Reporters have been trying to help Barack Obama limp across the finish line by creating a
daily distraction to divert attention from the Obama administration's awful record. Whenever possible, they have trumpeted the
claim that Mitt Romney has committed one gaffe or another, that he is falling behind in the (bogus) polls, that his campaign is in
disarray, and he is basically doomed. No doubt this gives reporters and editors momentary satisfaction, and they have indeed
convinced most people that Obama will likely win, but does that really advance the objective of re-electing Obama?
The day polling died.
[Scroll down] Pollsters themselves, when challenged on their stats, say they're just presenting a snapshot of public opinion. Fine, but
these snapshots are wildly distorted. The key hidden fact is that fewer than one in 10 respond to those who try to poll them.
People who screen their calls, hang up on people they don't know or end the survey because they don't have time to take it make up more than
90 percent of those phoned by pollsters.
CNN Is Just Making Up Poll Numbers
Now. First let me say, with less than three months to go in this campaign, can we please stop polling the political views
of "adults", rather than "registered voters." We really should be moving soon to a "likely voter" screen, but I'll take "registered
voters" for now. Knowing the political views of unregistered voters is worthless at the height of an election campaign and serves no real
purpose but to give the Democrats an advantage.
Washington Post joins
Poll "Truthers". [Scroll down] So what does this mean? It means that when you have a poll that closely reflects the
actual GOP vs Dem split (within 1.4 points of it if you believe Rasmussen) you get a result that accurately reflects what is going on
rather than a Democrat fantasy. Much as I hate to give solace to Andrew Sullivan, public opinion didn't swing 12 points in a week,
Pew simply took a sample that almost matches the American electorate and we are seeing what was already there, only more so.
Furthers Liberal Media's 'Racist' Narrative at RNC: 'Republican Party is White, Aging, & Dying Off'. The liberal media
can't seem to help themselves. While counter-arguments are occasionally acknowledged, most journalists of the progressive
persuasion are not interested in fair and balanced coverage of politics. Facts and figures are seemingly subjective in the
whole scheme of things. Severely limited studies and polls seem to provide them with all the information they need. Oh,
and almost everything is racist.
As Predicted: Now That Obama Is
Losing, Dems Play Mormon Card. This is a scripted attack, which seems to be a "push poll" specifically targeted at Catholics
registered as Republican, with the purpose of suppressing the pro-life vote for Mitt Romney. Exactly how widespread it is or who is funding
and directing it, we don't know.
NBC Uses D+11 Poll to Find Obama Up by 6.
Serious question: Does NBC just think we are all idiots? Have they been under a rock for the last decade and not realize that they no
longer can control the information we hear? Do they think they can breathlessly report that their latest poll has Barack Obama leading Romney by
6-points and not mention that they are using a D+11 sample?
Pollster pulls out of Fla., NC and
Va., says Obama can't win there. Suffolk University pollster David Paleologos, whose polls are aggregated into mainstream averages to show
where the presidential race stands in the swing states, said he's finished polling in Florida, North Carolina and Virginia because President Obama has
no shot of winning those states.
Ron Paul supporters decry media neglect.
Ron Paul finished just 152 votes behind Michele Bachmann in the Ames Straw Poll, but from the headlines
and TV news coverage, it's hard to tell he even showed up.
Fails to Publish Own Poll on ObamaCare's Lowest Popularity Ever. A new ABC-Washington Post poll
found ObamaCare sunk to its lowest popularity yet: 52 percent opposed, and only 43 percent in
favor. ABC mentioned the poll without fanfare at the end of a Jake Tapper report on Monday's World News
[12/13/2010], and Tapper added this was the health law's "lowest level of popularity ever." But
Tuesday's Washington Post reported not one sentence on the poll in the paper — even as they
reported in the paper that the same survey found Obama's tax-and-unemployment-compensation deal has "broad
Misreading the new
CBS poll. The headlines throughout the mainstream media are trumpeting the latest CBS poll:
"71% of the country disapproves of the way the Republicans are handling the debt ceiling crisis." The
implication being that the Republicans are at fault because of their intransience and Obama is winning the PR
battle. However a more in depth look at the poll reveals a skewed, at usual, result.
makes Herman Cain sit at the back of the poll. Herman Cain has been doing well in the polls, but
don't tell the Cracker Broadcasting System. The DC's Alex Pappas reports: "CBS omitted Herman Cain's
performance in a new Iowa poll of GOP presidential contenders despite his third place finish. On
Sunday's [6/26/2011] 'Face the Nation,' moderator Bob Schieffer correctly said former Massachusetts Gov.
Mitt Romney and Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann finished first and second in the poll. But then he
passed over Cain, incorrectly saying Ron Paul and Newt Gingrich polled next after the two front-runners."
Either Bob Schieffer has forgotten how to count — a distinct possibility — or he just doesn't want to give
Herman Cain any credit.
Obama and the Press so Silent on Afghanistan? The mainstream media basically downplayed or ignored
a March 15 Washington Post/ABC News poll which showed American support for the Afghanistan war seriously
eroding. For the first time since the war there began almost a decade ago, nearly two of three surveyed
said the battle is not worth fighting. Normally, such a dramatic turn in public sentiment against a war
would rate screaming headlines and endless speculation on how that might affect President Obama's political
standing and re-election chances in 2012.
Public Sector Union Poll Ignores Reality. While other polls have Democrats and Republicans roughly
even in party identification, the Times/CBS poll gives Democrats a 10-percentage point edge. Also,
20 percent of those questioned have a union member in their household and 25 percent have a government
employee. Those are considerably higher percentages of union members and government workers than actually
exist in the country. So the poll is slanted to begin with.
in Polling, It's All in the Question. What does the public think about the Bush
administration's wiretapping program? It depends on how you ask the question. A half
dozen polls on the issue have turned up different conclusions, and a key distinction appears to be
the way pollsters identify the people who might have their emails and phone calls monitored as
part of an effort to fight terrorism. Recent poll questions have referred to "suspected
terrorists," "people in the United States" and "American citizens."
Mitchell Touts Planned Parenthood Poll. During Tuesday's [12/6/2010] 1PM ET hour on MSNBC,
anchor Andrea Mitchell highlighted a new poll from the left-wing pro-abortion group Planned Parenthood that
claimed that voters do not trust Sarah Palin on so-called "women's health issues": "A new poll suggests
that she may have a tough time getting voters to trust her on at least one front... 54% of registered voters
do not trust Palin on those issues."
poll claims 60% Obama Approval. Obama sycophants in the media, which means most of the media,
have been trumpeting an Associated Press poll that purports a 60% approval rating for Barack Obama.
And if you believe that number, I have a compound in Abbottabad I'd like to sell you. The AP reached the
60% figure by lumping the majority of 'Undecideds' into the Obama approval column. Typically approval
polls categorize respondents into three categories: Approve; Disapprove; and Undecided. Not the
MSM Reports Wildly Flawed WI Exit Polls To
Spin For Obama. You should've seen the MSM last night on Twitter. I make it a point to follow several of these
folks in order to keep an eye on them, and the Wisconsin exit polls, released just after the state's polls closed at 8pm CT,
showed the recall race between Republican Governor Scott Walker and his opponent, Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett, tied at 50/50.
And was the corrupt media giddy? Oh yes they were. Not only was the MSM giddy over the idea Walker might lose, but they
then drip-drip-dripped all the internal numbers that spelled gloom and doom for our side.
Poll: Too Many Democrats in the Sample. This Newsweek poll released over the weekend [10/24/2010]
found some surprisingly good news for Democrats. But it probably doesn't mean much for President Obama and
his party: the sample includes too many Democrats, at least based on a lot of other recent polls.
Newsweek poll assumes lower GOP turnout than in 2008.
If you look at how each party does by the voters' partisan ID, and do the three-by-three equation ... you'll
find their registered voter sample is weighted as follows:
• 39 percent Democrat,
• 29 percent Republican,
• 32 percent independent.
They give different numbers at the end of their report, but this is how the poll is actually weighted,
according to the math.
The New York Times May Want To Poll This Question.
It seems every day there is another example of media deception in America. With the Fourth of July
approaching, it is well worth remembering why the Founding Fathers gave the press special privileges.
They wanted journalists to report honestly, to give the folks accurate, unbiased information so they could
make informed decisions about who should hold power.
York Times Misrepresents Global Warming Surveys. The New York Times on April 30 published a news
article that leads off with the assertion, "polls say 97 percent of working climate scientists now see global warming
as a serious risk." No such poll exists, but don't expect the New York Times to make a correction any time soon.
The only poll that resembles the Times' assertion was an online survey in which only 79 respondents listed themselves as
having climate science as their primary area of expertise. This is an absurdly small number of respondents -- even
overlooking the less-than-scientific nature of the poll itself -- from which to draw meaningful conclusions.
gets a boost after Gallup tweaks polling methodology. President Obama's job approval rating spiked this month,
according to Gallup's daily tracking survey, but the jump may be the result of a shift in the polling outlet's survey methodology.
Since late 2011, President Obama has held steady at just under 50 percent saying they approved of the job he was doing and just
under 50 percent saying they disapproved.
Gallup Ignoring Its
Own Big Stories. The Gallup Poll is one of the oldest in polling organizations in America.
Its reputation ought to be important. The articles which accompany Gallup's polls, however, seem
calculated to hide the real story.
54 Percent Say the More They Learn About ObamaCare, the Less They Like It. Washington Post Ignores its Own Poll Finding. A
Washington Post-ABC News poll conducted in the three days following President Barack Obama's speech to Congress about
his health care plan discovered that 54% say the more the hear about the plan the less they like it. This
particular poll result was not mentioned anywhere in the story about the poll that was posted by the Washington
Post on its Web site on Monday [9/14/2009]. The result did appear in the data sheet from the poll that was
linked to the story.
Still the Biggest
Missing Story in Politics. In August of last year I wrote an article, "The Biggest Missing Story
in Politics," which reviewed the single most important datum in the last thirteen Battleground Polls over a
period stretching from early 2002 to late 2008. The critical fact, completely ignored by almost everyone,
was that in answering Question D3, which asked the respondent what he considered his ideology to be,
sixty percent of the American people described themselves as "conservative" or "very conservative."
Conflicting interpretation of the same numbers:
Obama's approval rating sinks to new low. President Obama's approval rating has hit the lowest level
ever in CBS News polling, according to the latest CBS News/New York Times survey. The drop may be partially
attributable to rising gas prices. Just 41 percent of Americans approve of the job Mr. Obama is doing
as president, according to the poll, conducted from March 7 to 11.
At the same time... Viewpoint 2:
Obama's Job Approval
Rating Reaches 49% Over Weekend. President Barack Obama's job approval rating rose to 49% in the
three-day period from Friday through Sunday [3/11/2012], building on an upward trend that began the middle of
last week. Obama's current approval rating is the highest measured since early February, and before that
the highest since June 2011.
President Obama's approval rating has either sunk to a new low or reached a new high, depending on which newspaper you read.
Election questions no one ever
asks: After each debate, some network would convene a focus group of undecided voters who
then preened over their lofty status. Pollster Frank Luntz, CNN's Soledad O'Brien or some other
enabler would gush over how fascinating it was to talk to "real people." ... [But] These people are
undecided because they don't do their homework.
The cell phone effect: about 1 percent.
The question of whether polls have systematic errors is a continuing one. In the recent polling news is a Pew Center study that hits hard on the
question of cell phone users. According to the survey, failing to survey people who have cell phones but no landline leads to a net underestimate
of Obama's support relative to McCain. According to a previous Pew/AP survey, cell-onlys comprised nearly 13% of households at the end of 2006.
Cell-onlys prefer Obama over McCain by 18-19% (compared with an even split in the landline sample).
The Bradley Effect. The theory proposes that some voters will tell pollsters
they are undecided or likely to vote for a black candidate, while on election day they vote for the white candidate. It was named after Los
Angeles Mayor Tom Bradley, an African-American who lost the 1982 California governor's race despite being ahead in voter polls going into the
elections. The Bradley effect theory posits that the inaccurate polls were skewed by the phenomenon of social desirability bias.
If Barack Obama's re-election campaign ends in failure, you can expect to hear a lot about a man named Tom Bradley.
Does the Bradley Effect Overrate
Obama in the Polls? The Bradley Effect was observed in dozens of elections throughout the U.S. — from Virginia and North
Carolina, to Illinois and California — for about 15 years. It started with George Deukmejian's surprise win over Tom Bradley in
1982 and operated predictably in American elections until the mid-1990s. Then it vanished. Obama's victory in 2008 bore no traces of it.
The disappearing Bradley effect. [Scroll
down] Now comes a large-scale empirical study (in preprint form) by Harvard political scientist Dan Hopkins. He finds that since the
mid-1990s, the Bradley effect has disappeared. His paper is a must-read.
When and Why Polls Mislead about Black and Female Candidates.
The 2008 election renewed interest in the Wilder or Bradley effect, the gap between the share of survey respondents expressing support for a candidate
and the candidate's vote share. Using new data from 180 gubernatorial and Senate elections from 1989 to 2006, this paper presents the first
large-sample test of the Wilder effect.
Clearing up this silly media bias
business. The new Rasmussen poll reports that this time 51% of likely voters now fully expect reporters to help the incumbent Democrat keep his
office, while only 9% expect reporters to help the Republican ticket of Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan. Nine percent? Really that much? Other
Rasmussen findings: 18% of likely voters, presumably deaf, blind and living in closets, can't make up their minds, while 22% absolutely expect unbiased
coverage throughout the remaining national agony and bonanza for commercial TV stations. Obviously, they only watch C-SPAN.
still believe in one man, one woman. For years, the mainstream media has done their level
best to make the redefinition of marriage seem inevitable. As if in concert, local, regional, and
national outlets have published the results of poll after poll under headlines like "Majority of Americans
Now Supports Same-Sex 'Marriage,'" all in an attempt to silence opposition and create an atmosphere wherein
they can finally see the fabrication of same-sex "marriage" achieved.
results in early voting in California. California has begun early voting already as well as
mail-in balloting. The number of people who have gone in to vote in person has been extensive. The
results so far prove what we had always suspected. The polls are being proven as totally unreliable.
Oversampling Dems. How
important is it for polling organizations to include the correct proportions of self-identified Republicans and Democrats in their
polls? The short answer is: Extremely. In this hyper-partisan age, the partisan ratio can not only determine the
poll's top-line results, but also shape the ensuing media interpretation of what it all "means." That interpretation defines
the expectations game, which, in turn, affects fundraising, voter enthusiasm, and turnout.
Deceptive Polling: Polls are
among the most telling expressions of bias in the media. They are very often agenda-driven, used
to make a political point, or to pile on a favorite target. The most controversial and flawed
poll that has been most cited in recent weeks has been the CBS News poll finding that President Bush's
approval rating was down to 34%. But another poll, purporting to find that U.S. troops are weary
of the Iraq War or want a premature withdrawal, is also suspect.
Media Polls: Pimping
for Obama? Polls are manipulated in a number of ways, including question wording, the order
in which questions are asked, and how respondents are chosen. ... Pollsters acknowledge that they are
oversampling among three demographics that the Obama campaign is targeting: young people, minorities
CNN Poll: All Americans Are Racists. For
creating a story out of nothing and then finger pointing at US society and saying how evil it is, this
Dec. 12th CNN story takes the cake. In "Poll: Most Americans see lingering racism —
in others", not only is a somewhat leading poll cited as evidence that America is still rife with racism, but
CNN uses comments emailed to them by their viewers as some sort of follow up proof for it!
NBC/WSJ Poll: What The 'Today' Show Didn't
Report. These days, it is almost as telling what little gems media organizations choose to hide
from the public about their own polls as what they share. The release of the most recent NBC/Wall Street
Journal poll is a fine example.
You can be sure that when the media release a poll tied to a major news event, it's often biased. Take
the ABC poll. It was conducted from Aug. 17 to 24. Yet for some reason it wasn't released
until Sept. 10, the day Petraeus delivered his much-anticipated report on the surge. We also wonder
who actually conducted this poll on the ground in Iraq. Hope they weren't the same local reporters and
translators that U.S. newspapers and TV networks employ, many of whom have been found to be less than credible.
Media polls as
instruments of propaganda. The MSM's relentless propagation of Democrat-generated
dezinformatsia has portrayed Operation Iraqi Freedom as a quagmire, the booming economy as an
unjust bust and the President as a lawless spy and has even suggested that George Bush is at
fault for high fuel prices. All this certainly has taken its toll in the polls. These
polls become self-fulfilling when the MSM incessantly pushes a particular perspective, polls the
indoctrinated masses in search of that perspective and then reports the results as "news."
Obama fails the race test.
A March 26 CNN poll showed that 73 percent of Americans think [George] Zimmerman should be arrested, and this trial by media brings to
mind John P. Roche's observation that lynch mobs will claim to be highly democratic because there is only one dissenting voice.
scandalmongering co-presidents: To [the news media, President Bush is] the enemy,
and he must be taken out. And they're doing everything they can to make that happen, including
rigging the polls against him by oversampling Democrats, and including nonvoters along with voters,
to make him appear even less popular than he apparently is.
the Pro-Pope Polls of Catholics: ABC and The Washington Post downplayed
their finding that 81 percent of U.S. Catholics approve of the selection of Pope
Benedict XVI, and the other networks just ignored it.
chasm in military support for Kerry and Bush. October 11  editions of Military
Times publications (Navy Times, Army Times, Marine Corps Times, Air Force Times) carried an
astounding story not likely to get much coverage in the establishment press. Bush leads
Democratic Sen. John Kerry 73 percent to 18 percent in the voluntary survey of
4,165 active-duty, National Guard, and reserve subscribers.
partisan "domestic spying" fight. When given a choice between more information about
our intelligence-gathering methods and less safety, or less information about our
intelligence-gathering and more safety, which do the public choose? The public tends to
prefer more safety. The media prefer more information. And the media would prefer the
public believe it agrees with them, even if it has to cook a few surveys to establish that canard.
More information about "domestic spying" can be