Aside from the bad environmental news you may have heard about the items listed here and here, you may also have heard good things (from the government and from TV "news" programs) about things that aren't necessarily harmless, beneficial, feasible or affordable.

That includes such things as ethanol, windmill power, electric cars, mass transit, fluorescent light bulbs, and 1.6 gallon toilets.  This page is specifically about solar power, which may someday be practical and affordable without government subsidies, but as of today it is not.  Several solar power companies have already gone bankrupt, including Evergreen Solar, SpectraWatt, and Solyndra.  The people who used to work at these companies were probably proud of their green jobs, but now they know better.

Even before the Solyndra scandal erupted, the whole concept of relying on solar power to replace coal and natural gas was utter foolishness.  On a cold winter night — or any night for that matter — solar cells don't produce any electricity at all.  In the winter, the nights are longer than the days, and the days are often cloudy.  Additionally, your solar panels are useless when they are covered with snow.  The farther north you live, the more you experience these effects, and the more you need some kind of reliable power.  If you rely exclusively on solar power, and you want to sleep under an electric blanket all night and then wake up, make some toast and hot coffee, and take a hot shower, you will need to have a garage or basement full of locomotive batteries.  That means you'll have hundreds of pounds of lead in your house.

There may also be other risks with large battery systems.

Large battery banks require constant maintenance, and they hold enough stored energy to easily burn down your house if you're not careful with them.  "Your batteries should not discharge more than 50%, and should be recharged 100% immediately.  Undercharging, continued overcharging, or contamination can badly damage your batteries."*

See also The Hidden Risks of Batteries.

Oh, but you'll be saving money on your electric bill, right?  By all means, put a pencil to work before you buy your solar power system, and see if you can generate electricity for less than the cost of utility power.  You can't.  That's exactly why solar energy companies are going bankrupt:  With the exception of a handful of utility-hating hippies on the west coast, nobody is ever going to store and use electricity generated by solar cells, and no investor in the world — other than the U.S. government, while it is under Democrat control — will invest in an industry that will never be profitable.

The same is true of wind power.

Most recently, the merits of solar power have been eclipsed, if you will, by Solyndra scandal.  The bankruptcy of several large solar battery manufacturers clearly shows that solar power is not commercially viable.  The scandal lies in the Obama administration's eagerness to keep funding these operations anyway — motivated quite possibly more by politics than environmental ideology.

Background, overview and recap articles:

The Seven Dirty Secrets of Solar Energy.  Secret number one:  The sun is a lazy worker.  This one is hardly a secret.  Everyone knows it, and everyone ignores it.  The sun is an intermittent, erratic, and untrustworthy worker.  It never works the night shift, takes off all rainy days, and doesn't show up during cloudy seasons.  It is "off duty" for more than half the time.  Secret number two:  Solar energy never replaces fossil fuels; it sits on top of them.  Behind every solar "farm" sits a silent, poisonous partner:  an old-fashioned gas and oil electric factory.  Why is this?  Because of law number one:  Someone has to fill in when the lazy sun isn't working. [...] Secret number five:  Politics:  Solar "farms" grow votes for politicians, not electricity for consumers.  Given the preceding negatives, why do nations pursue solar energy?  Because of the backend revenue streams for oil and gas for one, but also for votes for "green new deal" politicians.

Low-Density Intermittent Energy isn't Renewable. 
  ·   Nuclear is 3 to 5 Million times as energy dense than Solar or Wind.
  ·   Solar is Toxic — a ticking recycling time bomb for the World.
  ·   Weather damages panels and rain leaches heavy metals into the soil.
  ·   California produces too much solar, is forced to sell the excess at a loss of $0.08 KWh to Arizona and Nevada; yet is still mandating more solar.
  ·   Renewables destablize our Grids; forcing expensive peaking power to ramp up, with higher pollution start and stop inefficiencies.
  ·   Solar takes 37 times the materials to make same amount of power as Nuclear

Why Planting Flowers under Solar Panels Won't Make Solar Work.  Solar energy is great for off-the-grid houses and installations.  It can be usefully applied for pumping water for cattle.  Non-electrical solar is perfect for heating swimming pools.  Passive solar can help with building energy usage and lighting.  Utility-scale solar that is going to participate in the electrical grid is nonsense.  It's too expensive, even with huge subsidies.  It doesn't work if it is cloudy or at night.  It delivers too much electricity in the middle of the day and not enough late in the day.  It can't replace any natural gas or coal plants because it can't be counted on.  It is an extremely expensive technique for reducing CO2 emissions compared to many other options.

The "New Energy Economy": An Exercise in Magical Thinking.  For silicon photovoltaic (PV) cells, the physics boundary is called the Shockley-Queisser Limit:  a maximum of about 33% of incoming photons are converted into electrons.  State-of-the-art commercial PVs achieve just over 26% conversion efficiency — in other words, near the boundary.  While researchers keep unearthing new non-silicon options that offer tantalizing performance improvements, all have similar physics boundaries, and none is remotely close to manufacturability at all — never mind at low costs.  There are no 10-fold gains left.

Timely news and commentary:

What Happens When a Tornado Goes Walkabout in a Solar Farm?  You know, I'm glad you asked.  Lemme show you.  [Tweet with video clip] [...] [This mess] is called is the 'Lake Placid Solar Plant'.  It's part of Duke Energy's Florida operations and is located out in the Central FL swamps, which is also, coincidentally, where Hurricane Milton blew through, accompanied by a mind-blowing number of tornadoes in those outer bands.

Solar Delusions.  Most people think that solar electricity is an excellent choice for powering the electric grid.  Most people are delusional due to overwhelming propaganda.  Solar can work for houses too isolated to be connected to a power line.  But as a large-scale power plant, generating 500 or 1,000 megawatts of electricity, solar energy is close to being a hoax.  Solar energy, dependent on the weather and the solar cycle, is unreliable.  It must be backed up by conventional generating plants.  Solar energy is peaky, peaking around noon.  But electricity consumption tends to peak in the early evening.  Solar congestion happens when the flood of electricity at the noon peak overwhelms the grid.  Serious solar farms must be equipped with time-shifting batteries that store the excess midday electricity and release it a few hours later when it is needed. [...] Solar and wind electricity are fashionable.  Nuclear, fossil fuel, and hydro are not.

I've seen how Ed Miliband's net zero dream turns into a nightmare.  It will destroy Britain.  [A] fire at a giant solar farm in East Anglia is raging out of control after a lithium-ion battery is believed to have failed, causing an explosion.  Two nearby villages were evacuated last night [9/30/2024] as toxic gases, vapours and particulates filled the air.  Fire chiefs warned residents who had not been evacuated to stay indoors.  There was particular concern today for children at a local primary school and residents of a care home.  Two boys, both asthmatic, were hospitalised after parents said they had suffered breathing difficulties.  One of the major hazards of lithium fires is the formation of "smokes" of nanoparticles of lithium oxide and lithium hydroxide, an extremely hazardous lung irritant.  Lithium battery fires also emit hazardous pollutants like hydrogen fluoride which causes serious burns.  The explosion at the solar farm, which was bitterly opposed by local residents but went ahead after gaining approval from Ed Miliband, the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, is believed to have damaged the integrity of neighbouring containers.  This led to an alarming chain reaction known as "thermal runway."

More Solar Silliness In The New York Times.  Hyping solar energy is one of America's most renewable resources.  For instance, in 1978, Ralph Nader declared that "everything will be solar in 30 years."  In 1979, President Jimmy Carter declared the US needed to capture more energy from the sun because of "inevitable shortages of fossil fuels."  In 2011, in the New York Times, Paul Krugman claimed we are "on the cusp of an energy transformation driven by the rapidly falling cost of solar power."  In 2015, presidential candidate Hillary Clinton pledged that if elected president, she would oversee the installation of 500 million solar panels.  In 2021, the Department of Energy released a study that claimed solar "has the potential to power 40% of the nation's electricity by 2035."  That's a mighty big claim.  Last year, solar accounted for about 5% of US electricity production.  Furthermore, solar only provided about 2.2 exajoules of primary energy to the US economy out of 94.2 EJ used.  The DOE also claimed solar could reach 45% of US electricity production by 2050.  (That same year, President Joe Biden declared that climate change poses "an existential threat to our lives.")  The solar hype continued last month in the pages of the New York Times with an article by David Wallace-Wells headlined, "What Will We Do With Our Free Power?"

Biden-Harris administration wants 31 million acres for solar agenda.  The Biden administration proposed to open up tens of millions of acres of public lands to solar development on Thursday after cementing restrictions on oil and gas activity across large swaths of Alaska.  The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) rolled out its proposed "Western Solar Plan," which would put approximately 31 million acres across 11 western states on the table for possible solar development.  The agency's solar plan comes on the heels of its Tuesday announcement that it had finalized protections for 28 million acres of public land in Alaska that will effectively prohibit oil and gas activity on that acreage.

Solar plants sit idle for 4 years in Australia because of fears they'd make the grid too unstable.  In 2016, the new Labor Government waved a magic wand and commanded they would be 50% renewable by 2030.  The experts said it was doable and would save $30 million a year.  They gave out the permits for large solar installations, which began construction in 2019, but then suddenly changed the rules in 2020, and wouldn't let the solar plants connect to the main Darwin-Katherine grid.  Unbelievably, 64 megawatts of solar panels that cost $40 million dollars have sat, doing nothing, for four long years.  "It's just reflecting back into space, not being used to power the grid and to substitute for diesel and gas turbine production," said local vet Peter Trembath, who leased his land to energy company Eni Australia for the solar project.

Biden Admin Looks To Open Up 31 Million Acres For Solar After Locking Up Oil, Gas In Huge Swath Of Alaska.  The Biden administration proposed to open up tens of millions of acres of public lands to solar development on Thursday after cementing restrictions on oil and gas activity across large swaths of Alaska.  The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) rolled out its proposed "Western Solar Plan," which would put approximately 31 million acres across 11 western states on the table for possible solar development.  The agency's solar plan comes on the heels of its Tuesday announcement that it had finalized protections for 28 million acres of public land in Alaska that will effectively prohibit oil and gas activity on that acreage.

Solar panel company halts plant construction in Colorado, will 'restructure' amid expected dip in 'profitability'.  Just yesterday, a contributor to Forbes touted Swiss solar panel maker Meyer Burger as "one of many success stories made possible by the IRA."  Mr. Jack Conness, a member of a "nonpartisan energy and climate policy think tank" that (ostensibly) only uses "careful research" and "science-based" information to arrives at its conclusions and policy recommendations, highlighted the company as a tale of smart "investment" into the private sector for a cleaner and greener future, saying this:  ["]Two days after the Inflation Reduction Act was signed into law, Meyer Burger, a solar cell and module manufacturing company, announced they entered into a supply agreement with D.E. Shaw Renewable Investments to supply solar panels in order to meet the uptick of solar demand in the United States.["] [...] Okay, fast forward to... less than 24 hours later, or today, from Reuters via Yahoo News:  ["]Meyer Burger halts solar plant in Colorado, plans restructuring[:]  Swiss solar panel maker Meyer Burger said on Monday it was suspending plans for a plant in Colorado as it announced restructuring measures and suggested profitability would be lower than previously expected.["]

State Regulations Force Bankruptcy of California Solar Company.  On the one hand, the state of California has decided that it shall become an all-electric, all-renewable power state by, well, for practical purposes, next Thursday.  On the other hand, the state gives utilities a massive break on how much they pay home solar generators for their excess power, leading to the just announced bankruptcy of California-based solar system installer SunPower.  Welcome to schizophrenic Sacramento.

Spare a thought for the slave labour building solar panels in China.  In Ed Miliband's fevered imagination his plan to plaster the countryside with solar panels and wind farms will not only guarantee our national energy security and save us all £300 a year on our energy bills, it will also create thousands of 'well-paid green jobs'.  True, it will create work for some, but it is less likely to be for blue collar workers beavering away in Britain than for Uyghur slaves being exploited by the Chinese state.  As with so much of our manufacturing industry, China has succeeded in gobbling up much of the West's market share in solar panels over the past few years.  In the mid-2000s, the country had virtually no involvement in the industry.  Now, according to the International Energy Agency, it makes 80 percent of the world's solar panels.

The Residential Solar Collapse.  SunPower Corporation, once a leading name in the U.S. residential solar market, recently filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.  Known for its high-efficiency solar panels and comprehensive installation services, SunPower had established itself as a significant player in the renewable energy sector.  The company focused on residential, commercial, and utility-scale solar solutions, and its strategic decisions, such as spinning off its manufacturing operations in 2019 to concentrate on residential installations, initially seemed promising.  However, financial strain, high interest rates, and economic downturns have significantly impacted their operations, culminating in severe liquidity issues and eventual bankruptcy. [...] The residential solar market as a whole is grappling with high financing costs, reduced consumer demand, and shifting policy landscapes.  Economic uncertainties and changes in key incentive programs have further exacerbated the situation, leading to a noticeable decline in new solar installations.

Solar power is a money pit, and so is Puerto Rico.
Solar panel program with a $1B price tag yields just a 'small' batch after two whole years.  First it was Pete Buttigieg and the mere seven electric vehicle charging stations his agency built for the American public after three years and nearly eight billion dollars, and now it's Kamala Harris and her "small" batch of solar panels for Puerto Rico, after two years and one billion dollars earmarked for the job. [...] News flash, this is Puerto Rico we're talking about, a territory that's basically always at-risk of experiencing an hurricane — it's an island in the tropics [after all]!  So they can't install the solar panels, to ostensibly secure the energy grid, because the weather is far too temperamental?  In a rational world, that reality might lead someone to question the practicality of installing solar panels in a zone that's prone to super destructive storms[,] but again, these are Democrats, so there's zero expectation of sound policy or intelligent thought.

Solar company goes dark, leaving residents on the hook for thousands.  Hundreds of people across the Midwest are complaining about a solar company that's gone dark, leaving some with solar panels sitting on their land but not hooked up to the grid.  Even on sunny days like Friday, Quimby, IA resident Aaron Bailey said his assembled panels don't do anything.  Just to be very clear:  His entire solar panel set-up is ready to go.  It's passed all the government inspections, the wires are hooked up, it just needs to be turned on.  But for more than a year, this homeowner says Revolution Solar failed to flip the switch.  It's unknown if Revolution Solar filed bankruptcy, or if they've just gone into hiding.  When our investigative journalist calls, he just gets a busy signal.  Bailey owes the bank more than fifty thousand dollars.  That would be fine if his solar system was up and running to save him money.  The whole idea is to cover the loan for the solar panels with electric savings.  The problem is, that while the panels are installed, they aren't turned on.  But the bank still wants its money.

Solar industry sees first projects put on ice as nuclear proposal sows doubt among investors.  Political turbulence around the renewable energy debate is making some clean energy investors nervous.  Despite reassurances from the federal government, the opposition's nuclear policy has sown some doubt over whether the renewable industry will continue to have Commonwealth policy support over the next several decades.  One Australian solar manufacturing business said it had already seen an impact.  Dr Methuen Morgan, head of solar farm installers Meralli Projects, said he had already seen an increase in hesitancy from investors.  "They're concerned about which way a potential future government is going to go," he told the ABC.

Photovoltaics "Causing Problems Electricity Distribution Grids.  In Germany there are growing fears of power grid blackouts.  The reason:  The effects that the "rapid expansion of photovoltaics" is having on grid stability.  "Many countermeasures will not take effect for years," reports the online business daily Handelsblatt.  "In 2023 alone, the number of photovoltaic systems connected to the grid rose by 30 percent to 3.4 million units, the Federal Statistical Office announced on Monday."  As more and more small-scale systems get installed, the more unstable power grids are becoming, experts are warning.  Because wherever more electricity gets produced than consumed, the grid can collapse.

World's Most Populous Nation Has Put Solar Out To Pasture.  Other Countries Should Follow Suit.  The transformation of Dharnai in the state of Bihar into a "solar village" was marked by great enthusiasm and high expectations.  Villagers were told the solar micro-grid would provide reliable electricity for agriculture, social activities and daily living.  The promise engendered a naïve trust in a technology that has failed repeatedly around the world.  The news of this Greenpeace initiative quickly spread as international news media showcased it as a success story for "renewable" energy in a third world country.  CNN International's "Connect the World" said Dharnai's micro-grid provided a continuous supply of electricity.  For an unaware viewer sitting in, say, rural Kentucky, solar energy would have appeared to be making great strides as a dependable energy source.  But the Dharnai system would end up on the long list of grand solar failures.  "As soon as we got solar power connections, there were also warnings to not use high power electrical appliances like television, refrigerator, motor and others," said a villager.  "These conditions are not there if you use thermal power.  Then what is the use of such a power?  The solar energy tariff was also higher compared to thermal power."

Italy approves decree banning installation of solar panels on agricultural land.  Italian Agriculture Minister Francesco Lollobrigida said the ban on solar panels would only apply to productive agricultural land, as quarries would still be allowed to be used for energy production.  However, EU-funded projects will be exempt from the ban.  With the decree, 'we put an end to the wild installation of photovoltaic panels on the ground," Italy's ANSA news agency reported Lollobrigida as saying.  The decree is part of a bigger package of measures to protect farming and fisheries, according to ANSA.

In the last six months Europe's solar manufacturing has collapsed by half.  Forty year old German solar panel producers are closing factories they only opened three years ago.  The world now has the capacity to make 1,600 GW of solar panels annually, but demand has unexpectedly flat-lined — staying at barely 500GW. In a world awash with solar panels that no one needs, prices have fallen dramatically, but that hasn't solved the glut which is so bad, people are using solar panels for fencing in Europe.  The CCP has bet big that the exponential growth curve in solar customers was going to keep being exponential.  Instead, demand flattened off suddenly.  Currently, 80% of the world's solar panels are pouring out of China.

The Green No Deal.  Given how much renewable energy has been promoted, dressed up, coddled, favored and subsidized over the last decade or two, it would be understandable to believe that a green transition is well under way.  But don't be fooled by the foolish.  Oil and gas are still king. [...] Overall global spending on green energy (which in this case includes nuclear — and always should) in 2024 will exceed $2 trillion, twice the $1 trillion in expenditures on fossil fuels.  Given all of this, it would be reasonable to believe that we're in the midst of a great green revolution in which conventional energy sources are being sidelined.  But we're not.  Take a look at this chart from Robert Bryce, an energy author and journalist whose work becomes more indispensable by the day.  [Chart]  Despite more than $4 trillion in global spending on just wind and solar from 2004 to 2022, hydrocarbon consumption grew 3.4 times faster.

No, solar panels are not farmland.  Concerned that rapid development threatened critical agricultural resources, Indiana's Legislature in 2023 commissioned a study to determine the status of the state's farmland.  Noting that most agricultural land loss neighbored cities and suburban areas, the study concluded that Indiana lost 345,682 acres of farmland between 2010 and 2022.  As Bill Gates and China notoriously gobble up price-inflating fertile lands, another pressure is devouring prime farmland.  Vast solar panel arrays are disappearing farmland across the nation despite howls of protest.  Perhaps that is why the Indiana study included solar panel acreage as farmland in its bizarre farmland accounting.  Solar panels are not a nitrogen-fixing cover crop, nor do they till into the soil annually like plants.  Cows and sheep can dine on the grass beneath them but can't eat solar panels any better than humans can.  The quite understandable question arises:  why did Indiana count solar farms' land use as agricultural?

Battery Baloney, Hydrogen Hype, and Green Fairy Tales.  [Scroll down]  Magical things are also expected from more rooftop solar.  AEMO [the Australian Energy Market Operator] says we need to quadruple rooftop solar by 2050.  But panel-power has four huge problems:
  [#0]   Zero solar energy is generated to meet peak demand at breakfast and dinner times.
  [#1]   Piddling solar power is produced from many poorly oriented roof panels or from the weak sunshine anywhere south of Sydney.
  [#2]   If too much solar energy pours into the network (say at noon on a quiet sunny Sunday), the grid becomes unstable.  Our green engineers have the solution — be ready to charge people for unwanted power they export to the grid, or just use "smart meters" to turn them off.
  [#3]   More rooftop solar means less income and more instability for power utilities so they have to raise electricity charges.  This cost falls heaviest on those with no solar panels, or no homes.

A signature Biden law intended to boost renewable energy also helped a solar company reap billions.  As he campaigned for the presidency, Joe Biden promised to spend billions of dollars to "save the world" from climate change.  One of the largest players in the solar industry was ready.  Executives, officials and major investors in First Solar, the largest domestic maker of solar panels, donated at least $2 million to Democrats in 2020, including $1.5 million to Biden's successful bid for the White House.  After he won, the company spent $2.8 million more lobbying his administration and Congress, records show — an effort that included high-level meetings with top administration officials.

Solar Company Collapses, Customers Furious as Dems' Favorite Power Source Leaves Homeowners High and Dry.  The glow of solar power is dimming for customers of yet another solar energy company that is fading into the night of promises it could not keep.  Titan Solar told employees on June 13 that it was "closing its doors" because no one would buy the company, according to Time.  Titan said that it put solar panels on more than 100,000 homes.  The fate of consumers who have panels on their homes and no one to maintain them is uncertain.  [Advertisement]  [Tweet]  [Promo]  Over 2023 and 2024 to date, 16 major solar companies have filed for bankruptcy, Solar Insure reported.  [Tweet]  [Advertisement]  Overall, an earlier Time report estimated 100 local solar installers had gone belly-up in 2023.  Others are on the brink.

Local, state opposition to wind and solar projects increased in 2023, study finds.  Opposition to wind and solar projects on the state and local level increased significantly last year, according to a new study by Columbia University's Sabine Center for Climate Change Law.  In 2023, the report found 73% more local restrictions than the previous year's report released in May 2023, and 111% more state-level restrictions.  "In nearly every state, local governments have enacted laws and regulations to block or restrict renewable energy facilities, or project opponents have succeeded in forcing the delay or cancellation of particular projects, or both have occurred," the report states. [...] The report mirrors data from energy expert Robert Bryce's renewable rejection database, which keeps a record of such rejections based on news reports.  According to the database, there were 66 rejections of renewable energy projects in 2014.  So far this year, there have been 682.

Solar Developer "Disinformation" Reality.  Charles Rotter passed along a link to an article by a solar energy developer in New York that claims disinformation campaigns were hurting New York's implementation of the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (Climate Act).  After I looked at the article, I can safely say that it's another example of my pragmatic environmental principle Observation on Environmental Issue Stakeholders:  The more vociferous/louder the criticisms made by a stakeholder the more likely that the stakeholder is guilty of the same thing.  This post looks at disinformation claims associated with a solar development project in New York.

California Electricity Rates:  I See What You Did There.  California has been offering a deal to those willing to install rooftop solar for more than 20 years.  Under a plan called "net metering" those who installed solar would be able to sell their excess power back to the the utilities at a rate which was comparable (often less) than what those same consumers were charged when they bought power from the utilities.  In effect, if you installed solar and regulated your own usage over the course of a year, you could potentially break even on your bill.  The amount you used (at night when the sun isn't shining) was evened out by the amount you generated.  Your annual bill could effectively be zero or in some cases the utilities might even owe you money.  Twenty years ago, solar was still pretty expensive so even if your bill went to zero, it would take many years of zeroing it out to cover the cost of installing the solar panels in the first place.  In other words, it was mostly well off people who were doing this because they could afford to put the money up now and only have it break even 15 or 20 years later (or never if the system didn't last that long or they moved).

Leaving the door wide open for a solar invasion.  I was recently made aware by one of our staunchly conservative county council members Amy Drake that one can plant solar panels in just about any farm field you want in Indiana without any permitting or rezoning whatsoever.  A solar field suddenly showed up near my shop in St. Joseph County, Indiana.  I made an erroneous assumption this required permitting to convert valuable farmland to a worthless solar field. [...] Across the street from this blight, Microsoft is in the process of purchasing 900 acres of the most historic and prime farmland in this region to construct a data center right smack in the middle of a very rural and peaceful residential community. [...] Surrounding these two developments are several thousand more acres of prime farmland that the county has decided is "best used" for industrial purpose.  Of course, they didn't ask anyone who actually lives here — they made this decision from their offices in downtown South Bend.

Solar's Been Taking a Beating Lately.  There have been some spectacular flameouts in the land of solar cells lately.  Actually, there was one today.  Couldn't have made a bigger splash if it tried as it fried.  [Advertisement]  [Tweet]  Yes, you read that right.  In the middle of a big swim meet with thousands of school kids and parents gathered in Australia under the roof of the Sydney Olympic Park Aquatic Center, that solar panel-encrusted roof lit off.  [Tweet] [...] Emergency crews got there and found the fire was literally in the solar array itself.

Coal's importance for Solar Panel Manufacturing.  Why is it that solar panel manufacturing is impossible without coal?  I always thought that coal is "only" important for electricity, contributing to 36% of global power demand, or over 8h of 24h every single day of the year.  I always thought that coal is "only" required to produce all steel.  Let us have a look at solar panel manufacturing, which is really about silicon production.  The vast majority of all energy required to make solar panels is consumed during silicon production, purification, and wafering.  But first let's talk about purity.  6N pure silicon means 99.9999% purity level, 11N pure silicon means 99.999999999% purity level, you get the point.  You may now have a first glimpse of the chemical and mechanical difficulty of making such a pure metal from a natural product.  In this blog post you will see how important uninterrupted power supply is, especial for industrial processes such as silicon smelting.  Obviously, this power comes from coal in China, and cannot come from wind or solar.

German solar industry collapsing: unable to make solar panels from solar power.  About 90% of solar panels installed in Germany come from China, and earlier this year one of the last solar panel manufacturers closed in Germany.  Last week, what was left of the industry begged for mercy (and subsidies) which they didn't get.  Now another German solar panel manufacturer has closed down.  For some cruel reason German factories which are close to their customers, can't compete with distant foreign factories which have access to slave labor, fossil fueled shipping and cheap coal fired electricity?  The bigger question, seemingly, is how did the country that invented the printing press, diesel engines, and the theory-of-relativity get fooled by such a stupid ploy?

Biden OK's Chopping Down of 4200 Joshua Trees for a Solar Farm.  Biden signed an executive order to chop down 4,200 Joshua trees to install solar panels for a favored company, Aratina Solar Project.  The funds for removing the trees will be placed in a mitigation bank, which is code for politicians' pockets.  They've cut the once-protected trees before.  This isn't the first.  They have a lot of them, about two million, and they are in the Joshua Tree National Park.  The trees are unique, and they all have unique signatures.  Where are the environmentalists when you need them?  They only come out of the woodwork when Republicans or energy companies want to do something that will help Americans.  Climate change concerns are a massive fraud.  [Tweet]

World's largest floating solar farm (you read that right) suffers "major loss" after being hit by storm.  [T]his floating solar farm was built on the backwaters of the Omkareshwar Dam in Madhya Pradesh, India, and as you can see by this upcoming video it's been severely damaged by a storm that ripped through the area last month.  [Tweet with video clip]

After Installation, Solar Panels Become a Maintenance Nightmare.  The green new deal and switch to "alternative' energy looks like it's going exactly as planned: costing the taxpayer trillions of dollars and generally pissing everybody off.  That was the case with a number of solar panel owners who are now finding it difficult to get their panels serviced, according to WBAL TV.  Solar panel installation is touted as offering benefits like reduced energy costs, environmental friendliness, and significant rebates.  However, many homeowners have discovered a concerning issue within the industry:  addressing technical problems can be exceedingly challenging — if not outright impossible.

Constructing Eco-Unfriendly Solar Panels  Over  In California's Aqueducts Is Newsom-Level Stupid.  On April 5, 2024, Governor Gavin Newsom of California announced with much fanfare the plan to cover the state's irrigation canals with solar panels to provide electricity for residents and prevent the evaporation of water in these canals.  It sounds like a great idea.  But is it?  This technology has actually been discussed for almost ten years.  Over 100 climate activist organizations such as Greenpeace and the Center for Biological Diversity urged Interior Secretary Deb Haaland and Bureau Commissioner Camille Touton "to accelerate the widespread deployment of solar photovoltaic energy systems" above the Bureau's canals and aqueducts.  They claimed that if all 4,000 miles of Bureau-owned canals and aqueducts were covered by solar panels, more than 25 gigawatts of renewable energy could be produced.

The Editor says...
Lots of things could happen, but probably won't.  This scheme could produce 25 gigawatts of power, if it is built on top of a mountain at the equator.  But not if it's built in drainage ditches in California.  And what happens to the solar panels when a flash flood comes roaring down the canal?

'Free Solar Panels' Aren't Really Free.  Ads and promotional emails for free solar panels abound, but beware — unless you've received solar panels as a gift from a friend or charity, there are no solar panels out there just free for the taking.  Some free solar offers are scams that aim to collect your personal data during the process of determining your eligibility for services or working up a price quote — and these unscrupulous outfits also may use installers who are unlicensed and/or lack certification from the North American Board of Certified Energy Practitioners.  Other free solar offers are typically actually solar leases, power purchase agreements (PPAs) or $0-down financing.  These arrangements give you the option to go solar with no upfront cost, but you'll be paying later.

Scotland's solar speed cameras have failed, due to a lack of Sun!.  They were envisaged as a simple, yet effective way of letting drivers know when they were speeding.  However, radar speed signs — famous for their alternating happy or angry faces — are being rendered useless in Scotland due to budgetary constraints and the country's cloudy skies.  A Mail on Sunday investigation shows some cash-strapped councils have abandoned the network of signs, with many left broken and others unchecked for as long as five years.

As Predicted, California Has Killed the Rooftop Solar Market, Now the State Supreme Court May Step In.  About 2½ years ago I wrote a post titled "California plans to kill the residential solar industry."  At the time, I had just had solar panels installed on my roof to save money and within months California announced a new plan (Net Metering 3.0) that would have taxed me and anyone else who owned a rooftop solar system for owning the panels.  I predicted that if this plan passed, California's rooftop solar industry would fall off a cliff. [...] The backlash to the initial plan was strong enough that Net Metering 3.0 was revised but eventually it did pass and went into effect on April 15, 2023.  Since then, rooftop solar installations in California have indeed fallen off a cliff.

The Man Who Led Solyndra to Bankruptcy Gets $6.6B from Biden.  Remember Brian Harrison, who ran the Solyndra scam and walked away rich?  Well, he's back, and Biden is giving him $6.6 billion in grant money to make computer chips, about which he knows little.  Solyndra was an Obama scandal.  Taiwanese chipmaker TSMC's Arizona subsidiary, whose president is former Solyndra head Brian Harrison, will receive $6.6 billion to build a factory in Phoenix, Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo announced Monday, Free Beacon reports.  According to the Beacon, Harrison was CEO of Solyndra when it declared bankruptcy in 2011 after receiving over $500 million in loans from the Obama administration.  Billions of dollars in Biden energy spending have gone to bankrupt companies ornearly bankrupt companies and their losing CEOs.  "Thanks to this investment, TSMC will also build a third chip factory in Phoenix, increasing its total investment in Arizona to $65 million and creating over 25,000 direct construction and manufacturing jobs, along with thousands of indirect jobs," Biden said.  Biden wants to pick winners and losers, and he's terrible at it.

Why Climate Change And Solar Farms Don't Mix.  I just ran across a news story about a massive solar "farm" in Texas destroyed by hail.  I will use the word "farm" only twice in this article in association with solar panels because that's what everyone likes to call them, but putting solar panels on a vacant field is an insult to "farming," so I'm going to call it a solar field instead.  I then internet-searched "hailstorm destroys solar farm" (that's the last time I'm using those two words together) and clicked on "Images."  Stunning is the only word that comes to mind.  This is not the first time delicate solar fields have been destroyed by nature — it's happening all over.

The Editor says...
Yes, and the term "Bitcoin mining" is an insult to miners, but that's what it's called.

Why The Wind And Solar Racket Is The Green New Scam On Steroids.  A strange thing happened the other day.  A large-scale solar panel farm in Fort Bend County, Texas, thousands of acres right in the middle of oil country, experienced a rough hailstorms.  That's not entirely unusual for the region.  I grew up in Texas, and it was always astonishing to have life going on as normal only to have golf ball-sized ice cubes rain down from the heavens seemingly out of nowhere, doing enormous damage to cars and homes.  Well, in this case, the storm utterly destroyed the entire solar panel farm of thousands of acres.  "They look like somebody took a shotgun and blasted it into the air and let the pellets fall down and shatter holes all in them," a resident told the local news.

Giant Hail Destroys Large Portions of 3,000-Acre Texas Solar Farm, Residents Fear Chemical Leak.  A 3,000-acre solar farm 40 miles from Houston, Texas, was massively damaged on March 15 when huge chunks of hail fell from the sky and shattered hundreds of panels, leaving the facility running at "reduced capacity."  From the look of the pictures, it would seem that it's operating at heavily reduced capacity.  [Tweet]  Not only does the storm highlight the fragility of so-called green energy facilities, but area residents are worried about toxic chemical leaks.

Hail cripples massive solar farm, sparking resident fears about vulnerable 'green' tech.  A major hail storm near Houston knocked out large parts of a major solar farm, sparking energy reliability and chemical exposure concerns among nearby residents.  An onslaught of hail in southeastern Texas that destroyed large portions of a massive solar farm is highlighting the perils of trading traditional power sources for vulnerable "green" alternatives and forcing local officials to allay residents' concerns about the potential for chemical leaks from the broken panels.  Aerial footage captured the significant damage suffered by the Fighting Jays Solar farm in Fort Bend County, Texas.  The March 15 storm shattered hundreds of panels and prompted nearby residents to question if the solar panels were leaking chemicals such as cadmium telluride, which is linked to serious health risks in humans.

Three energy realities that renewable advocates can't answer.  [#2] Renewables increase the cost of electricity.  Renewable advocates often claim that the adoption of more wind and solar will lead to lower electricity costs, but the opposite is true.  In a previous Substack, we wrote in detail about how utility companies with the largest rate increase requests in the country admit the energy transition is a major reason behind increasing electricity prices for families and businesses. [...] How is it that renewable advocates are so wrong about electricity cost increases stemming from massive wind and solar buildouts?  The answer lies in relying on fundamentally flawed means of comparison between different electricity sources and the lack of accounting for the diminished value that wind and solar offer the grid compared to more reliable energy sources like coal, natural gas, and nuclear.  In other words, the framework they use for determining electricity prices is wrong because they don't account for the full system costs of maintaining reliability.

Wind and Solar Are No Solution.  Our electricity is mainly produced using fossil fuels, with some hydroelectric (dams) and some nuclear.  Wind and solar are supposed to take the place of fossil fuels.  Right now, when the wind does not blow nor the sun shine, the slack is taken up using coal and natural gas.  To be available when needed, these sources of electricity are kept idling.  But under such conditions, they use almost as much fuel and produce almost as much carbon dioxide, so you have gained little.  When these resources are eliminated, we will have to depend on huge batteries.  In some places, during the winter, there may be week after week with cloudy weather, with rain and snow.  (Where we live in North Idaho, we have had only one week of clear weather in three months.)  It would be impossible to build a battery large enough to power a city for a day, let alone for a week, or a month. [...] Solar panels last a few years.  They produce no electricity at night and little in the early morning or late afternoon.  They produce no electricity when covered with snow, and they make little sense in the northern states or in Canada.  (In fact, I wonder if they make any sense north of the 45th parallel.)  Further, some solar installations failed (more) after a few years, or did not produce as planned.

Dispelling the Cult Claim — "Wind and Solar are Lower Cost Generation than Natural Gas".  Intrigued by the many eco-warriors touting how wind and solar are cheaper generation sources then natural gas I decided to use Scott Luft's (Cold Air) compilation of data for 2023 to calculate on a "simple" basis what each generation source actually cost us ratepayers/taxpayers to see if the claims made were even close to the truth.  Below is a small sampling of what the claims were and who made them!  Please note that four of them are registered "charities" and one is from the Federal Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change!

Stealing with Solar:  The Great Net-Metering Heist.  Affluent households in California siphoned nearly $3.4 billion in 2021 from the pockets of low-income families through a government program called net metering.  This program allows people with solar panels to get free electricity while forcing people who can't afford them to pay all of the costs associated with maintaining the electric grid.  What a steal!  Net metering allows customers with rooftop solar installations to sell their electricity back to the grid at the full retail price of power rather than the lower wholesale price that other power providers are paid.  This is great if you own solar panels, but it effectively pays rooftop solar owners more than the electricity is worth. [...] The problem with this arrangement, however, is that the people with solar panels on their roofs are not paying their fair share to upkeep the rest of the grid, but these substantial costs don't disappear; they are foisted upon people without solar panels.  For example, while using solar power will reduce the need to burn some fuel, the cost of fuel is a relatively small part of the total retail price of electricity.

Steal From the Poor, Give to the Rich.  That's what solar power does.  American Experiment's Isaac Orr and Mitch Rolling have an excellent expose of California's solar power scam:  Stealing with Solar:  The Great Net-Metering Heist.  Subhed: "How Solar Panels Helped Wealthy Californians Pick The Pockets of Low-Income Families." [...] It turns out that if solar power isn't massively subsidized by lower income electricity users, the demand for it drops precipitously:  [Chart]  Wind and solar energy are scams that are kept alive only by government corruption.  To the extent you scale back the corruption, they disappear.

California Solar Companies Hit The Skids After Receiving Huge Handouts From Biden, Dems.  Numerous rooftop solar panel companies in California are staring down bankruptcy despite the industry's receipt of generous state and federal subsidies.  For many years, the state has generously subsidized the rooftop solar industry to the annual tune of up to $6 billion in order to spur green energy development, a spokesperson for the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), the state's utility regulator, told the Daily Caller News Foundation.  Now that state subsidy dollars are starting to dry up, rooftop solar companies in California are struggling mightily, with one insurance company estimating that about 75% of the affected companies in the state are at high risk for collapse, according to pv magazine USA.  Despite the state's rooftop solar industry receiving subsidies from the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), President Joe Biden's signature bill that includes $370 billion in green energy spending, rooftop solar firms across California are struggling to stay afloat.

Venango Township supervisors reject solar farm proposal.  Many Venango Township residents are breathing a sigh of relief after supervisors unanimously rejected a proposed project they feared would redefine their community.  That project was a 900-acre, 80 mega-watt solar farm that would include about 300,000 solar panels in Wattsburg.  "I've heard it referred to as a six-month nightmare, but we needed that time for them to become educated about the process and to come together as a community.  Ultimately, we got the outcome that we wanted," said Bruce Whitehair, Venango Township resident.

The Rooftop Solar Industry Could Be On the Verge of Collapse.  A decade ago, someone knocking on your door to sell you solar panels would have been selling you solar panels.  Now, they are probably selling you a financial product — likely a lease or a loan.  Mary Ann Jones, 83, didn't realize this had happened to her until she received a call last year from GoodLeap, a financial technology company, saying she owed $52,564.28 for a solar panel loan that expires when she's 106, and costs more than she originally paid for her house.  In 2022, she says, a door-to-door salesman from the company Solgen Construction showed up at her house on the outskirts of Fresno, Calif., pushing what he claimed was a government program affiliated with her utility to get her free solar panels.  At one point, he had her touch his tablet device, she says, but he never said she was signing a contract with Solgen or a loan document with GoodLeap. [...] She's on a fixed income of $960 a month, and cannot afford the loan she says she was tricked into signing up for; she's now fighting both Solgen and Goodleap in court.  Her case is not uncommon.

Mannum solar farm fire - 9 January 2024.  10 firefighters responded to a triple zero call at 9:45am about an inverter in a shipping container bursting into flames at a solar farm on Piggery Road.  CFS crews managed to keep the fire contained to the shipping container and stop it spreading to nearby solar panels.

Dictatorial Control, From Covid to Climate.  Wind and solar installations, transmission lines, and enormous battery complexes would sprawl across millions of acres of now scenic wildlife habitat and agricultural land.  A single solar facility proposed in Virginia would involve 3,000 acres of panels on 21,000 acres (over half the land area of Washington, DC).  It's just one of dozens of Virginia solar plans — on top of onshore and offshore wind turbine projects.  The installations "will power millions of homes," supporters insist.  Perhaps — but only when the wind is blowing and sun is shining at optimal intensities ... maybe 15-30% of the year in northern latitudes, considering winter snow and sunlight, clouds, nighttime, zero wind and other factors.  Many local residents and other citizens don't want these massive installations in their backyards; the habitat and scenic vista destruction, bird and bat killings, health problems, and electricity costs and disruptions that go with them; or being turned into energy colonies for progressive urban centers.  They've already blocked more than 500 wind and solar projects, on environmental and other grounds.

Massachusetts Solar Power Hits a Wall.  Like many blue states, Massachusetts was an early adopter of the solar power craze, pushing through government subsidies to spur development and setting up solar panels everywhere they could be jammed into place.  But now the solar wave is slowing to a crawl, making the state what the Boston Globe describes as "a victim of early success on solar."  Hundreds of previously approved projects that were billed as being capable of producing 400 megawatts of energy are sitting idle.  And there seems to be a great deal of confusion about what went wrong in the planning stages.

Department of Energy hands $3,000,000,000 to solar panel company accused of preying on dementia patients.  Just over the last year and in Texas alone, there have been more than 50 complaints filed with the state's attorney general's office against the company, known as Sunnova, for alleged "predatory" business practices — a company that has received at least $3 billion in taxpayer money.  Below, you can find a few of the testimonies:
  •   An 86-year-old Texas man diagnosed with dementia signed a 25-year lease; his daughter was left with a $34,000 bill.
  •   An elderly man struggling with senility and months to live signed a contract for $60,000.  (He died shortly after entering into the agreement.)
  •   An 80-year-old woman who was "blind, bed bound, partially deaf, on dialysis, with congestive heart failure" signed a 25-year lease worth $86,000.  (She died within three months.)
  •   A 78-year-old man entered a contract for a 25-year lease but died soon after; a custodian of the house found herself on the hook for $40,000.
To add another layer of scandal, Jigar Shah, Biden's director of the DOE's Loan Program Office (the office responsible for doling out the $3 billion), founded and led a "trade association" named Cleantech Leaders Roundtable (CTLR) before he came onboard as a "civil servant."

Do You Want Electrical Vehicles And Solar Panels Made By Child Slaves And Forced Laborers?  The next time Joe Biden or any politician pushes electrical vehicles or solar panels, ask them where they stand on slavery because the elements that run electrical vehicle batteries and the minerals that go into the creation of solar panels could be made off the sweat and tears of slave laborers as young as six years of age.  Everyone in the climate change world and anti-human trafficking arena knows this but the climate changers may be banking on the average person not knowing this.  When state legislators claim they are working for clean energy, it is best to ask how they are going to achieve that and how are they going to prevent an increase in slavery to achieve their clean energy goals.  Michigan is shooting to reach 100% clean energy by 2040, but now, Michigan House Republicans are proposing to stop the funding of any projects that involves child slaves and forced laborers mining for the minerals to assemble the solar panels and electrical vehicles battery parts.

Overspending for Solar Can Capsize an Entire National Economy.  Here is the story of how solar helped cripple Germany's economy.  It is a story consisting of three simple steps:  overspending, printing money, and triggering inflation.  It can stand as an object lesson in macro-economics, and as a warning against Big Solar for the world. [...] In common parlance, Fiat money is essentially fake or government counterfeit money — except that it's legal.  It is supported by neither gold nor silver nor commodities in the real world, but simply by a government "decree" or Fiat.  (If only we could pay our income taxes that way!)  It saves countries from bankruptcy after they have gone massively into debt mismanaging taxpayer money.  Frequently, it is to pay for wars, after these have decimated an entire economy.  What is extraordinary in the German case, however, is the sheer size of the self-bailout — a half-trillion, a staggering amount, even for the largest economy in Europe.

Fury over plans to turn Welsh beauty spot into one of UK's biggest solar farms covering 334 acres.  Villagers have hit out at plans to surround one of Wales' most renowned beauty spots with thousands of solar panels.  People living in the quaint village of Bishton, east of Newport and on the boundary of the Gwent Levels beauty spot have criticised a renewable energy developer's proposals to cover at least 334 acres of land with solar panels.  UK-based JBM Solar, owned by German energy company RWE, is behind the Craig Y Perthi solar farm project, which will occupy 590 acres of land in total, with solar panels positioned to the east and west of the village.

The dark side of solar panels — how crooks are exploiting net zero.  After a decade of green initiatives and generous government incentives, solar panel sales are booming.  Over 50,700 units were mounted on UK rooftops between January and March, double the figure in the same three months last year, as homeowners scramble to save money in the face of soaring energy bills.  But as solar panels have flown off the shelves, the industry has developed a dark underbelly in which scammers and cowboy installers take eco-friendly households for a ride.  The Financial Ombudsman Service received more complaints mentioning solar panels in 2022 than in the previous eight years combined, Telegraph analysis reveals.  Complaint numbers have sky-rocketed from a low of 15 in 2018, to a record high of 853 last year.  Many of the complaints involve customers being promised bumper returns on their green investment by rogue traders who convince them to take out large loans to cover the upfront cost.

Don't believe the renewables myth.  Wind and solar are not cheap.  Politicians everywhere are repeating the mantra that renewable energy is cheap, and we need to use it instead of gas (currently expensive in and near Europe) to bring down energy costs for households. [...] The Inflation Reduction Act has been designed to make this a reality.  Lots of investment in lovely green energy and green jobs.  This sounds wonderful.  Unfortunately, renewables are not cheap. [...] Originally, subsidies were paid because the technology for producing renewable electricity was immature meaning upfront costs were exceptionally high, but after more than 20 years of subsidies, this is no longer the case.  Today, electricity prices are still determined for the most part by the cost of fossil fuels, so renewable electricity can be sold at much higher prices than the short term cost of production (which is next to nothing).  But even then, renewables still require subsidies.  In fact, subsidies are growing.

Alberta to Wind and Solar:  Not Just Now, Thanks.  Alberta's Conservative premier Danielle Smith has announced a moratorium on new wind and solar projects in her province. [...] In short, Smith wants to pair new wind-and-solar capacity with new natural gas capacity, because of the basic unreliability of renewables.  She's concerned that relying too heavily on wind-and-solar could compromise the electric grid.  But the Trudeau government disagrees.  They've manipulated the market and established a regulatory regime as part of Trudeau's pledged transition away from the traditional resource sector — one of the backbones of the Canadian economy, remember — such that adding new natural gas capacity is nearly impossible.  Since Ottawa has dug in their heels on oil-and-gas, Smith has decided to dig hers in on wind-and-solar.

Let Them Eat Solar Panels.  Recently, during a speech at a high-dollar fundraiser for the League of Conservation Voters in Washington, D.C., President Joe Biden exulted about a solar project in Angola.  According to a transcript of his speech that can be found on the White House's website, Biden said:  "We have plans to build a railroad from the Pacific all the way across the Indian Ocean.  We have plans to build in — in Angola one of the largest solar plants in the world.  I can go on, but I'm not.  I'm going off-script.  I'm going to get in trouble."  Ignore, of course, Biden's gaffe about building a railroad across the Pacific.  Ignore, too, his statement that he was "going to get in trouble" for going off script.  Joe Biden is the president of the United States.  He commands a huge arsenal of warships, warplanes, and nuclear weapons.  With whom, exactly, might he be getting in trouble?  Instead, focus on the part about the solar project in Angola. [...] You can be forgiven for not knowing that Angola, an impoverished country of 32 million people where more than 60% of the population doesn't have access to electricity, has made any climate commitments at all.

The Power Of Power Density.  The shape and size of our energy systems are not being determined by political beliefs about climate change.  Instead, those systems are ruled by the Iron Law of Power Density which says: the lower the power density, the greater the resource intensity. [...] The mineral intensity of offshore wind, including huge amounts of copper and zinc, is shocking:  roughly 15,400 kilograms per megawatt of generation capacity.  That is roughly 13 times more than the amount needed for natural gas-fired generation (1,148 kg) and six times more than what's needed for a coal plant (2,479 kg).  The Iron Law of Power Density explains why Siemens Energy just reported a $2.4 billion loss on its wind business in the latest quarter.  It explains why offshore wind projects here in the U.S. and in Europe, are being canceled left and right.  It also explains why, all around the world, rural communities and landowners are fighting back against the landscape-blighting encroachment of massive wind and solar projects.

One solar company poised to rake in $11 billion under Dem rule.  U.S.-based solar panel manufacturer First Solar may receive up to $11 billion in subsidies from the government thanks to the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), according to the Wall Street Journal.  The company expects to receive up to $710 million in subsidies this year alone, which is an amount equivalent to nearly 90% of its predicted operating profit for this year, according to the WSJ.  Philip Shen, managing partner at investment bank Roth Capital Partners, estimates that the IRA may end up giving First Solar up to $11 billion in subsidies over the course of the next decade.

Slave labor is the secret to solar power's "success".  I have nothing against solar power or for that matter electric vehicles.  I think each of them fits into a genuine market niche, and if approached realistically they will play a role in the economy for the indefinite future. [...] I'd love to have a luxury 5th-wheel RV loaded up with batteries and tons of solar panels to make short-term off-grid living comfy!  I've even looked into what it would take to do it.  But the plunging price of solar panels is at least partly an illusion, although a useful one for opponents of fossil fuels.  Solar panel production is highly dependent upon Chinese supply chains, and those Chinese supply chains are often using Uighur slave labor.

Destroyed Solar Panels In Hailstorm Will End Up In Landfills Because Recycling Isn't Economical.  The extent of the damage at a Scottsbluff solar farm that was heavily damaged in a hailstorm last week remains unknown.  "They're still working through that process," Grant Otten, spokesperson for the Nebraska Public Power District, which buys electricity from the solar farm, told Cowboy State Daily.  Cowboy State Daily reached out to Sol Systems, which financed and developed the project, but didn't receive a response.  While some of the solar panels at the farm may be salvageable, as well as other equipment, it's likely many of the panels will need to be discarded.  Even if solar panels aren't destroyed by weather events, they gradually stop producing much electricity and reach the end of their lives in 20 to 30 years.

Solar Panels Don't Really Help the Environment, but They Do Help Our Enemies.  The Biden administration has sunk billions of taxpayer dollars into "renewable" energy, but a new report won't surprise Americans who've read any honest research on solar panels.  It reveals that the panels are nearly as carbon-intensive as natural gas.  Not only that, investment in solar benefits America's number one enemy:  China.  Twitter Files journalist Michael Shellenberger shared the analysis from C.P. Colum and Lea Booth on Twitter.  The research, published as "Solar Panels Are Three Times More Carbon-Intensive Than IPCC Claims," was conducted in collaboration with Environmental Progress and The Blind Spot.

Solar panels Three Times more carbon intensive than natural gas?  Michael Shellenberger (that wonderful, courageous man) had a serious of tweets this afternoon and I could not believe my eyes. [...] Chinese manufactured solar panels have taken over the field and we are still told that solar is much cleaner — even with the obvious drawbacks and limitations I've gone over here a million times — that any natural gas powered electricity source.  AND THERE IS NO CHINESE DATA IN THE SYSTEM  I think we all know how the Chinese came to be at the forefront of solar panel manufacturing — the same way they've done everything else.  They don't have an innovative bone in their collective billion bodies, but what they do have is conniving.  Plus cheap labor, no environmental strictures, and enterprise once they steal what they need to make something.  And that's exactly what happened with the solar industry.  There were once German leaders in solar technology who are long out of business because of the Chinese filching their designs.  The fact that these were all Western technologies worked in the favor of the Chinese, too, as far as general acceptance without question concerning the "green" bono-fides for their products.

The ultimate debunking of "solar and wind are cheaper than fossil fuels."  Myth: Solar and wind are cheaper than fossil fuels.  Truth: Solar and wind are only cheaper than fossil fuels in at most a small fraction of situations.  For the overwhelming majority of the world's energy needs, solar and wind are either completely unable to replace fossil fuels or far more expensive.
  •   Observe that "solar and wind are cheaper than fossil fuels" is usually invoked, not to encourage competition but to justify coercive government policies to punish fossil fuel use and favor solar and wind.
  •   Observe that the same people claiming "solar and wind are cheaper than fossil fuels" moved heaven and earth to demand at minimum hundreds of billions of dollars in subsidies under the "Inflation Reduction Act" for these supposedly "cheaper forms of energy."
  •   On its face, justifying favoritism toward solar and wind by invoking their cheapness is highly suspicious.  If they're cheaper, why do they need coercive policies to throttle their fossil-fueled competitors (e.g., opposing fossil fuel investment, production, and pipelines) and reward solar and wind?

Solar sprawl is tearing up the Mojave Desert.  Is there a better way?  High above the Las Vegas Strip, solar panels blanketed the roof of Mandalay Bay Convention Center — 26,000 of them, rippling across an area larger than 20 football fields.  From this vantage point, the sun-dappled Mandalay Bay and Delano hotels dominated the horizon, emerging like comically large golden scepters from the glittering black panels.  Snow-tipped mountains rose to the west.  It was a cold winter morning in the Mojave Desert.  But there was plenty of sunlight to supply the solar array.  "This is really an ideal location," said Michael Gulich, vice president of sustainability at MGM Resorts International.  The same goes for the rest of Las Vegas and its sprawling suburbs.  Sin City already has more solar panels per person than any major U.S. metro outside Hawaii, according to one analysis.  And the city is bursting with single-family homes, warehouses and parking lots untouched by solar.

Nebraska solar farm crippled by hail, underscoring power source's fragility.  A recent major hail storm in western Nebraska took an entire solar farm out of commission, forcing the local community to turn back to traditional power sources, local officials said.  The so-called Community Solar Project — a 4.4 megawatt solar field comprised of 14,000 solar panels and located in Scottsbluff, Nebraska — is not currently operating and will remain offline until repairs are completed, the Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD) confirmed to Fox News Digital.  NPPD, the state-owned public utility, and energy firm GenPro Energy Solutions developed the project in 2020.  "The solar complex was destroyed by hail," Scottsbluff City Manager Kevin Spencer said in an interview.  "They're assessing the damage, but it certainly looks destroyed to me."

Huge Nebraska Solar Park Completely Smashed To Pieces By One Single Hail Storm!  Multimillion dollar solar project gets reduced to a heap of toxic rubble by one single hail storm.  The Scottsbluff, Nebraska 5.2 MW Community Solar project was part of the NPPD's Sunwise program that consisted of an array has over 14,000 solar panels.  It's reported that it had been put into operation in 2019.

Solar Panels: The Unspoken Environmental Cost.  For more than a decade, climate change skeptics have been sounding the alarm about the not-so-distant consequences of the global push for renewable energy, particularly solar panels.  Their concerns, too often dismissed or overlooked, are now making headlines.  A recent BBC podcast, "The Climate Question," raises serious issues about the lifespan and end-of-life management of solar panels, issues that we have been echoing for years.  ["]While they are being promoted around the world as a crucial weapon in reducing carbon emissions, solar panels only have a lifespan of up to 25 years,["] writes Daniel Gordon of BBC Sounds.  That's a significant problem considering the sheer number of panels being installed worldwide.  As Dr. Rong Deng states,  ["]The world has installed more than one terawatt of solar capacity... there could be as many as 2.5 billion solar panels.["]  The truth is, solar panels aren't eternal.  And as they age, billions will eventually need to be disposed of and replaced, creating what Ute Collier, deputy director of the International Renewable Energy Agency, describes as a potential "waste mountain by 2050."

Ramping up wind turbines, solar panels and electric vehicles can't solve our energy problem.  Many people believe that installing more wind turbines and solar panels and manufacturing more electric vehicles can solve our energy problem, but I don't agree with them.  These devices, plus the batteries, charging stations, transmission lines and many other structures necessary to make them work represent a high level of complexity.  A relatively low level of complexity, such as the complexity embodied in a new hydroelectric dam, can sometimes be used to solve energy problems, but we cannot expect ever-higher levels of complexity to always be achievable.

Models Hide the Shortcomings of Wind and Solar.  Overview of this Post:  In Sections [1] through [4], I look at some issues that energy modelers in general, including economists, tend to miss when evaluating both fossil fuel energy and renewables, including wind and solar.  The major issue in these sections is the connection between high energy prices and the need to increase government debt.  To prevent the continued upward spiral of government debt, any replacement for fossil fuels must also be very inexpensive — perhaps as inexpensive as oil was prior to 1970.  In fact, the real limit to fossil fuel extraction and to the building of new wind turbines and solar panels may be government debt that becomes unmanageable in an inflationary period.  In Section [5], I try to explain one reason why published Energy Return on Energy Investment (EROEI) indications give an overly favorable impression of the value of adding a huge amount of renewable energy to the electric grid.  The basic issue is that the calculations were not set up for this purpose.  These models were set up to evaluate the efficiency of generating a small amount of wind or solar energy, without consideration of broader issues.

Smoke impedes solar panels.  Back during the last solar eclipse over the continental United States in 2017, grid operators in California had to make adjustments to the electricity grid to account from the lost solar power during the 90 minutes or so that the eclipse dimmed sunlight in California.  Such is the sensitivity of solar power to clouds and other obstructions such as routine dust, winter snow, and ... forest fire smoke.  The northeast is learning this right now amidst the smoke plume blowing down from Canada.

Solar Power Generation Cut In Half Due To Canada Smoke.  For the sake of solar power, let's hope Canada can bring its rampaging arsonists to heel.  That's because the shroud of smoke that covered much of the Eastern US seaboard, has sent solar power generation in parts of the eastern US plummeting by more than 50% as wildfires rage in Canada.

How solar farms took over the California desert: 'An oasis has become a dead sea'.  eep in the Mojave desert, about halfway between Los Angeles and Phoenix, a sparkling blue sea shimmers on the horizon.  Visible from the I-10 highway, amid the parched plains and sun-baked mountains, it is an improbable sight: a deep blue slick stretching for miles across the Chuckwalla Valley, forming an endless glistening mirror. [...] Over the last few years, this swathe of desert has been steadily carpeted with one of the world's largest concentrations of solar power plants, forming a sprawling photovoltaic sea.  On the ground, the scale is almost incomprehensible.  The Riverside East Solar Energy Zone — the ground zero of California's solar energy boom — stretches for 150,000 acres, making it 10 times the size of Manhattan.  It is a crucial component of the United States' green energy revolution.  Solar makes up about 3% of the US electricity supply, but the Biden administration hopes it will reach 45% by 2050, primarily by building more huge plants like this across the country's flat, empty plains.

It Was Always Only About Power With the Left.  California has been building massive solar farms in pristine deserts and rural areas.  Many spread over thousands of acres and require disruptive supporting infrastructure.  In the American Midwest, these new generations of solar farms are unlike anything in our recent past.  Often in size larger than Manhattan, they take out of production tens of thousands of acres of prime farmland.  What is curious about all these next-generation projects is the relative silence of environmentalists to the radical disruptions and dangers they pose to fragile and pristine natural landscapes, rare species of flora and fauna, and quality of life for surrounding rural communities.  In the case of hundreds of thousands of lost farm acres, prior liberal advocacy for preserving America's heartland, and its precious family farm acreage and those who work it, likewise go out the window.  Yet if any clean-burning natural gas plant, affordable housing development, a border wall, retirement community, or farming operation caused as much havoc to the environment as solar — and often wind — farms, there would arise leftist outrage replete with environmentalist-driven court injunctions.  In other words, left-wing environmentalism is calibrated only by whether the Left or the Right is reengineering the landscape.

Most House Democrats, Eight Republicans Help Biden Shield China's Solar Industry from U.S. Tariffs.  Nearly all House Democrats, along with eight House Republicans, helped tank an effort to override President Joe Biden's veto of a bipartisan plan that would have restored United States tariffs on China-made solar panels.  In June 2022, Biden announced a 24-month tariff moratorium on solar panel imports from Cambodia, Thailand, Vietnam, and Malaysia.  Commerce Department officials suspect that the solar panels are actually made in China but have been routed through the four southeast Asian nations to avoid U.S. tariffs on China-made solar panels.  The suspension of tariffs came even as Biden's Commerce Department found that BYD Hong Kong rerouted its production through Cambodia, Canadian Solar and Trina through Thailand, and Vina Solar through Vietnam for the sole purpose of avoiding the tariffs.  This week, after Biden vetoed a House and Senate-approved plan to reinstate the tariffs on solar panel imports, 197 House Democrats and eight House Republicans voted to help the administration stave off the tariffs.

The Dawn of a U.S. Nuclear Renaissance.  There are geopolitical and energy realities coming to fruition that nuclear can solve. [...] The solar panel market is dominated by China.  In 2022, GE's renewables division, the world's largest turbine manufacturer Vestas, and Siemens Energy lost over $4 billion USD combined backing renewable hardware.  The unreliability of the product is the culprit, along with high raw material and logistics costs.  Add a backlash against renewables for their high land requirements and the gargantuan amount of mining needed to extract rare earth metals and minerals, and it shouldn't be surprising that energy realism has taken a back seat to fantasies.

Renewable energy growth brings mounting waste challenge.  Driven primarily by wind and solar power, renewable energy sources surpassed coal for electricity generation in the United States last year, marking a significant milestone.  However, as the industry expands, a new problem emerges:  what to do with the mounting waste generated by worn-out solar panels and wind turbine blades.  More than 90% of discarded solar panels end up in landfills.  By 2030, the retired panels are estimated to cover an area equivalent to about 3,000 football fields.  But the panels, primarily composed of glass and aluminum, contain valuable and reusable materials.

Bipartisan House Votes to End Tariff Protections for Chinese Solar Manufacturers.  Despite objections from the Biden administration, the House voted 221-202 to strike down tariff protections given during the Obama administration for solar panels built by Chinese manufacturers.  The Chinese solar panel industry already dwarfs the U.S., and the need for a tariff — if there ever was a need — is gone.  "Joe Biden's decision to protect Communist China's solar manufacturers from U.S. tariffs is another demonstration of weakness from an already spineless administration," House Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R-Minn.) told Fox News Digital.

8 House Republicans vote in favor of the Chinese Communist Party.  Just yesterday Breitbart News reported that eight House Republicans joined the Democrats to support Joe Biden's suspension of United States tariffs on suspected Chinese-manufactured solar panels. [...] Biden being soft on China should come not to be a surprise to anyone.  The president of the watchdog Government Accountability Institute, Peter Schweizer, revealed that in 2013 Hunter and Joe flew on Air Force Two to China two weeks before Hunter's firm inked a $1.5 billion deal with the CCP operated Bank of China.  Schweizer exposed numerous lucrative shady deals that benefited the Biden family and Hunter's businesses, where Joe appeared to have a ten percent stake in a company formed in partnership with top CCP officials.  We must also remember that Joe Biden's Washington think tank, the Penn Biden Center for Diplomacy and Global Engagement, received more than $54 million from individuals or entities linked to the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) from 2014 to 2019.  It would not be beyond the realm of possibility that the attempt to waive tariffs happened with Biden's knowledge that solar panels were made in China but were re-routed to other countries to evade tariffs.

Solar Stooge Kathy Hochul Burns Farm Preservation Rulebook.  I became aware of the particular issues of utility-scale solar development on agriculture after I had a couple of people contact me describing issues that they had and suggested that I look into the issue.  The problems that they raised are real, solutions to mitigate problems are available, but in the rush to develop as many renewable resources as quickly as possible the State of New York has dropped the ball on responsible utility-scale solar development.  Given the massive amount of projected utility-scale solar generation capacity required to meet Climate Act goals the rush to develop solar projects could easily lead to the permanent loss of significant amounts of prime farmland that will hurt farming communities and endanger Climate Act strategies to sequester carbon in soil.

Sunshine Might Be Free But Solar Power is Not Cheap.  Mississippi residents are consistently told that renewable energy sources, like solar panels, are now the lowest-cost ways to generate electricity, but these claims are based on creative accounting gimmicks that only examine a small portion of the expenses incurred to integrate solar onto the grid while excluding many others.  When these hidden expenses are accounted for, it becomes obvious that solar is much more expensive than Mississippi's existing coal, natural gas, and nuclear power plants and that adding more solar will increase electricity prices for the families and businesses that rely upon it.  One of the most common ways of estimating the cost of generating electricity from different types of power plants is a metric called the Levelized Cost of Energy, or LCOE.

Run, Don't Walk, From Solar Energy Co-Ops.  Let me say that I am not against solar power.  Two years ago, I installed a photovoltaic (PV) system on my house.  Honestly, my biggest reason was that I thought it prudent to take money out of my equities and invest it into my house when Biden became president.  Turns out I was on target in that respect.  But, beyond that, my electric energy costs since installation are about $30 per month, no matter how hot or cold (I pay the grid connection fee and, of course, the governor still wants his tax).  After two years, I'm glad I did it; it has added good value to my property. [...] I know some readers will take me to task for being a sucker; solar panels are only for hippies and leftists.  They are made by Chinese child slaves, and they incorporate heavy metals that are, today, difficult to reprocess.  But I honestly like my panels.

Media Silent on Biden Admin Plan to Snatch Public Land For Solar Farms.  The media have been largely silent on a Biden administration energy project that one conservationist said would be "armageddon" for public lands.  It's a far cry from how reporters covered similar proposals under former president Donald Trump.  In December 2022, Interior Secretary Deb Haaland announced that her department would expedite plans to build solar energy farms on up to 100 million acres of untouched public land in five Western states, in a bid to "tackle climate change."  The announcement has garnered little to no national attention, save for the occasional report that the Biden administration is expanding renewable energy production.  National outlets took a far more critical approach to Trump-era land use proposals.  "Where Will Trump's War on Public Lands End?" the New Yorker wondered in 2017.

The Editor says...
The climate cannot be prevented from changing.  Solar panel projects are well-known boondoggles that only the U.S. government believes it can afford.  Ask any private homeowner, who has had solar panels on his or her rooftop for a few years, how well that's working out.  I suspect that a large percentage of the solar panels installed on residential rooftops are only there because [#1] an aggressive salesman, years ago, lied about the benefits of solar power, and [#2] even though they don't work, it would cost too much to remove them from the house, they can't be recycled, and somebody will have to be paid to haul them to a landfill.

Big solar goes Big Bust: Largest solar plant in the world dies before it can be built.  But it's a win for the rare Typhonium plant, and possibly also for millions of crabs around Indonesia who might have been hypnotized by undersea cables like the ones near the UK are.  And who knows what that cable would have done electromagnetically for turtles, dugongs, whales and dolphins?  Where are the Greens when giant experimental industrial parks span 5,000 km of wilderness?  Today the massive Sun Cable project collapsed into voluntary administration four years after promising to build the world's largest solar power plant in the Northern Territory.  Sun Cable was a $35 billion project supposedly to collect those sacred green electrons on a 12,000 hectare "farm" in Australia (120 square kilometers) and send them to Singapore via an 800 km land cable and then a 4,200 km undersea cable.  It was theoretically going to be nine times bigger than the largest solar plant in the world, and use a cable 6 times longer than the longest one ever built.  So this was ambition-on-steroids, and had economies of scale up the kazoo, and possibly as much sunlight as any place on Earth, but it was still obscenely uneconomic and expensive.

The Editor says...
[#1] I haven't looked into this (yet), but I suspect that 90 percent of the electric power in this country is consumed within about 100 miles of the place it was generated.  Long-distance power transmission is common, but it's not economically feasible unless the power source is unusually large and reliable (e.g., Hoover Dam, Grand Coulee Dam) and the demand is great.  [#2] It would be a great understatement to say this Australian project was ambitious.  The longest undersea power cable in the world is the North Sea Link, which is 450 miles long.  The Australian project would have shattered this record by almost six-to-one, which should have been a warning to investors that it was never going to happen.

Las Vegas: Muslim faces terror charge after causing 'major damage' to solar plant.  He says he did it "for the future."  Is he some kind of hyper-radical environmentalist who objects even to solar plants, or who thought that he was ramming his car into a conventional power plant?  Or did he do it for a "future" caliphate?  There is no information on either possibility in the available news stories.

The Editor says...
Are muslims offended by solar panels?  I'll have to add that to the list.

Solar Power In Spain.  [Scroll down]  It averaged 1180 MW, but was only really producing at a [reasonable] quantity between 11.00 am and 4.00 pm.  Solar capacity in Spain is 18523 MW, meaning that it was only running at 6% of capacity yesterday [1/2/2023].  The idea that the whole of Europe could live off solar power from Spain is ridiculous.

It is Time to Talk About "Capacity Factors".  In electricity generation, capacity factor, utilization, and load factor are not the same.  A lot of confusion exists in the press and certainly in politics, and even amongst "energy experts", about using the term "capacity factor".  It may be excused, since the distinction made in this article became only relevant with the penetration of variable "renewable" energy, such as wind and solar, in our energy systems.
  •   Worldwide average solar natural capacity factor (CF) reaches about ~11-13%.  Best locations in California, Australia, South Africa, Sahara may have above 25%, but are rare.
  •   Worldwide average wind natural capacity factors (CF) reach about ~21-24%.  Best off-shore locations in Northern Europe may reach above 40%.  Most of Asia and Africa have hardly any usable wind and the average CF would be below 15%, except for small areas on parts of the coasts of South Africa and Vietnam.
Natural capacity factors in Europe tend to be higher for wind than for solar.  Wind installations in Northern Europe may reach an average of over 30% (higher for more expensive offshore, lower onshore), but less than 15% in India and less than 8% in Indonesia.

Costs of Wind and Solar Energy Are Skyrocketing.  Advocates of wind and solar energy have argued that the cost of those energy sources would decline over time as they are more widely adopted.  That never made any sense, and it has not proved true.  In fact, the cost of both wind and solar energy is destined to continue rising sharply as the massive quantities of materials they require become more expensive as a result of increasing demand, driven by ill-advised (the politest adjective I can think of) government mandates and subsidies.  In fact, the cost of electricity generated by wind and solar is already skyrocketing.  My colleague Isaac Orr reproduced this chart at American Experiment.  It shows the average cost of wind and solar energy as contracted for in Power Purchase Agreements with utilities from 2019 through early 2022.  It should be noted that these are subsidized prices, not the full cost if you include the portion that is paid by taxpayers.

Solar Firm Collapses, Owing UK Taxpayers £655 Million.  A solar energy company has fallen into administration after racking up more than half a billion pounds in debt to a local authority in Essex, southern England.  Toucan Energy Holdings 1 Ltd., which owns 53 solar farms across the country and was owned by the financier Liam Kavanagh, had borrowed £655 million ($773 million) over four years from Thurrock Council to fuel its expansion.  [Paywall]

China Boasts of Soaring Demand for Its Solar Panels During Europe's Self-Inflicted Energy Crisis.  China's state-run Global Times boasted that the Chinese solar panel industry has "gained a historic foothold in Europe" thanks to European environmentalist policies that deprived the Continent of reliable energy after Russia shut down its gas pipelines.  "Demand for PV [photovoltaic] products has reached a new high, driven by surging natural gas prices amid the Russia-Ukraine conflict and the damaged Nord Stream pipelines.  Lately, Chinese solar panels have gained growing popularity among European consumers in addition to electric blankets and hand warmers," the Global Times wrote, providing a grimly amusing snapshot of energy-dystopian Europe on the edge of winter.

Electric Mania.  [Scroll down] This distinction between renewable and nonrenewable is a fallacy as surely as it was a fallacy that electrical currents could bring a dead person back to life.  How do we capture wind or solar energy?  We must produce other things, like wind turbines and solar panels.  Are these clean?  No.  The dirty secret of wind energy and solar production is that the actual wind energy rotors and the solar panels are made of material that, at the end of its useful life, is literally ground up and put into a landfill.  I'm going to talk mainly about wind turbines, but keep in mind that everything I say is also applicable to solar panels.  By 2030, the United States is expected to see as much as one million total tons of solar panel waste.  By 2050, the United States is expected to have the second largest number of end-of-life panels in the world, with as many as an estimated 10 million total tons of panels.  What is going to happen to all that waste, much of it toxic?  Wind turbines typically contain more than 8,000 different components.  One such component are magnets made from neodymium and dysprosium; rare earth minerals mined almost exclusively in China.  Extracting REs is an energy intensive and heavily polluting process, which makes a mockery of "clean energy" all by itself.

Why solar 'tripping' is a grid threat for renewables.  May 9th of last year was supposed to be a typical day for solar power in west Texas.  But around 11:21 a.m., something went wrong.  Large amounts of solar capacity unexpectedly went offline, apparently triggered by a fault on the grid linked to a natural gas plant in Odessa, according to the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT).  The loss of solar output represented more than 13 percent of the total solar capacity at the time in the ERCOT grid region, which spans most of the state.  While all of the solar units came back online within six minutes, the incident highlighted a persistent challenge for the power sector that experts warn needs to be addressed as clean energy resources continue to displace fossil fuels.

California is learning that solar doesn't work without battery storage.  California got through the biggest heat wave of the year without having to order any blackout but only just barely.  Gov. Newsom is praising the state's shift to renewable energy as if avoiding the blackouts is proof that the shift to renewables is working. [...] We actually did have blackouts in some places on the hottest days but those were ordered by the power companies not the state.  I wonder to what extent those outages helped the state's independent regulator avoid ordering rolling blackouts.  In any case, everyone agrees we came really close.  Wednesday the Washington Post published a story arguing that the real lesson Newsom and others should have learned from barely avoiding blackouts this summer is that solar without battery storage really doesn't work very well.

Tesla Battery Catches Fire in California Causing Shelter-In-Place Advisory Due to Toxic Smoke.  A Tesla Megapack battery caught fire at PG&E's Elkhorn Battery Storage facility in Monterey County, California.  A shelter-in-place advisory was in place for 12 hours due to fears of toxic smoke from the fire caused by Elon Musk's battery system, with county officials announcing that even though the fire was "fully controlled" by 7:00 p.m. PT, "smoke may still occur in the area for several days."  KSBW Action News 8 reports that a Tesla Megapack battery caught fire at the local utility company PG&E's Elkhorn Battery Storage facility in Monterey County, California.  The fire reported started at around 1:30 a.m. on September 20 according to the comm manager for PG&E, Jeff Smith.  No injuries were reported at the time.

Amazon Powered Down All Its Solar Panels Because They Kept Catching On Fire.  Amazon powered off all solar panels from its warehouse roofs' in 2021 after its installations malfunctioned, leading to multiple fires and electrical explosions across its North American warehouses for over a year, according to CNBC.  Solar panels caused "critical fire or arc flash events" in at least six of its 47 North American warehouses with solar installations, between April 2020 and June 2021, according to internal documents acquired by CNBC.  The fires caused Amazon to temporarily diable all its solar installations as the company wanted to ensure its systems were designed, operated and maintained correctly before they could be brought back online.

The Numbers Don't Add Up on Cider Solar Project.  [Scroll down]  In New York, solar power produces only about 12.6 percent of its theoretical capacity.  That means we can expect this 500-megawatt facility to produce only 552 million kWh, annually.  That's enough power for just under 79,000 homes, 37 percent less than advertised.  Moreover, that's only 14 percent as many homes as a more reliable source of electricity could power.  Sure, when the sun is shining, Cider Solar may power more homes.  But on very cloudy days it will power even fewer homes than calculated here.  Cider Solar isn't unique in that respect.  The state's Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA) as a whole is based on dubious assumptions and questionable math.

A Democrat President Again Wastes Taxpayer Money On Useless Renewables.  Ironically, on September 4, 2009, then-Vice President Joe Biden was the one who announced that the Department of Energy (DOE) had just finalized a $535 million loan guarantee for Solyndra, LLC.  This green energy company manufactured "innovative cylindrical solar photovoltaic panels that provide clean, renewable energy."  Biden enthusiastically noted the DOE loan guarantee aimed to finance the construction of Solyndra's manufacturing plant.  He also bragged that the annual production of solar panels from the first phase of Solyndra's plans would provide energy equivalent to powering 24,000 homes a year for over half a million homes during the project's lifetime.  On September 6, 2011, Solyndra filed for bankruptcy, suspended operations at its headquarters, and laid off 1,100 workers.  Solyndra went bankrupt despite $535 million in federal loan guarantees and more than $700 million in venture capital funding.

Report: U.S. Importers Struggle to Find Solar Panels in China Not Made by Uyghur Slaves.  American solar energy companies are reportedly having difficulty complying with the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA), a law that went into effect in June requiring importers to prove their goods are not tainted with slave labor from the oppressed Uyghur Muslims of China's Xinjiang province.  The UFLPA sets tough standards for importers to affirmatively demonstrate that no forced labor was employed in harvesting raw materials or assembling finished products.  Everything imported from Xinjiang is presumed tainted unless proof to the contrary is provided.

Environmentalism is an Environmental Hazard.  [Scroll down]  The California Public Utilities Commission has admitted that the state has far more solar panels than it needs, but has argued that it should "dramatically overbuild solar" and then let it go to waste.  Wasting a lot of energy has become the best way to stop waste and save the planet.  But that's not all that's going to waste.  With a lifespan of 25 years, the early generations of solar panels have begun to clutter up the state's landfills.  Ironically, only about 10% of the solar "green energy" solution are recycled and the rest represent a serious toxic waste hazard.  Behind the illusion of clean energy is the grimy reality that solar panels break down and just turn into poisonous and dangerous trash.  Recycling, itself a scam, often just sends our waste abroad to poor countries.  A New York Times article described how in Africa, laborers "break them open with machetes and drain the acid into the ground by hand" which "pollutes the soil and water with lead, which can lead to brain damage."  Actual recycling of solar panels is unworkable because it costs more to recycle them than it does to make them.  So it's just more economical to bury solar panels in landfills.

Biden's Green Energy Future Relies Too Much On China's Solar Boondoggle.  Most Americans are all for doing "something" about climate change but aren't willing to pay very much to do it.  If it's a problem, it's a global one.  The U.S. cannot fix it alone.  Every nation must participate.  Some, like China, simply refuse and its use of coal is rising so fast that it wipes out any benefit the reduction of U.S. carbon emissions has had.  Most Americans don't realize how reliant on China the Biden plan is.  The hoped-for transition to producing electricity from renewable sources like wind and solar can't happen without cheap Asian-made solar panels being allowed into the United States.  Without them, the nation can look forward to rolling brownouts — which the White House would like to avoid in the coming summer months, causing it to move quickly to suspend the tariffs on them for two years, despite credible evidence of dumping.

California went big on rooftop solar.  Now that's a problem for landfills.  California has been a pioneer in pushing for rooftop solar power, building up the largest solar market in the U.S. More than 20 years and 1.3 million rooftops later, the bill is coming due.  Beginning in 2006, the state, focused on how to incentivize people to take up solar power, showered subsidies on homeowners who installed photovoltaic panels but had no comprehensive plan to dispose of them.  Now, panels purchased under those programs are nearing the end of their typical 25-to-30-year life cycle.  Many are already winding up in landfills, where in some cases, they could potentially contaminate groundwater with toxic heavy metals such as lead, selenium and cadmium.

Biden's Solar Power Scam:  How Phony Emergency Declaration Will Help China.  When it comes to energy policy, President Joe Biden has become a master of doing the wrong things for the wrong reasons.  His policies on solar panel production and imports are prime examples.  Everyone agrees that we ought to be good stewards of the planet.  That's why it's critical that we get energy and environmental policies right.  Unfortunately, Biden hasn't.  Instead, Biden is pushing for a rapid, government-mandated transition to a society powered by wind and solar energy that he promises will deliver zero greenhouse gas emissions.  That is neither responsible nor reasonable.  Rather, it is a political fantasy agenda that will reduce access to reliable, affordable energy, damage our economy, harm the environment, and undermine our security program.

The "Net Zero" Agenda Has Devastating Consequences.  Proponents of solar will point out that solar generates decent energy returns.  What is often missed is that the numbers used to support this are more often than not cherry picked from locations (enjoying sunlight) and daytime hours.  This is a problem given that solar doesn't work when the sun doesn't shine, which is on a cloudy or rainy day as well as at night.  And this is the time when the bulk electricity demand comes into play to cover for the lack of solar energy.  If a source generates electricity at a time inconsistent with demand, the price it can sell for can often be negative.  It's like trying to sell me a cold cappuccino at 3 pm.  I don't want it.

US solar companies weigh challenge to Biden pause on tariffs.  U.S. solar manufacturers say they are considering legal challenges after President Joe Biden declared a two-year pause for tariffs on solar imports from Southeast Asia.  Biden also invoked the Defense Production Act on Monday as the White House moved to jumpstart solar installations that have been slowed or abandoned amid a Commerce Department inquiry into possible trade violations involving Chinese products.  The White House said Biden's actions would boost an industry crucial to his climate change-fighting goals while not interfering with or shutting down the Commerce investigation.

Biden Administration Declare[s] National Emergency for Clean Energy Production.  Earlier today [6/6/2022], Joe Biden, working toward the agenda of Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, Wall Street multinationals, and the radical climate change activists within the far left of the socialist democrat party, declared a national emergency around the issue of U.S. energy prices and policies.  On the front side of the justification, the people in control of the Biden administration, claim that current and future increases in energy prices are likely to do severe damage to the economy and the lives of all Americans.  However, in the background of the issue, this is the 'never let a crisis go to waste' phase of an energy crisis the administration has intentionally created.  The real goal is to fundamentally transform the foundation of the U.S. economy away from fossil fuels and into a new era of clean renewable energy.  This is what all of the Biden cabinet officers now refer to as the "economic transition" phase.

Biden [is] finally taking executive action to up domestic energy production — of solar energy.  Whether it be his continued efforts to "deter" Russian President Vladimir Putin after the invasion of Ukraine had already begun or responding to the baby formula shortage after shelves had gone bare, President Joe Biden's reactionary leadership has been putting America last for nearly a year and a half now, and his latest move to ramp up domestic energy production is sure to do the same.  On Monday [6/6/2022], the White House announced that the president will be invoking the Defense Production Act (DPA) along with other executive actions to try to combat the overwhelming reality that the Democratic policy initiatives are crippling the American economy.  With the average price for a gallon of gas more than double since Biden was inaugurated and experts warning of rolling blackouts throughout the summer because the energy grid is not suited to meet the expected demand, the president has decided to double down.  The news broke late Sunday that he would be pushing solar projects stalled by a Commerce Department tariff probe and promoting other clean energy projects.

This country doesn't need solar panels.  It needs petroleum.  QmlkZW4gaXMgYW4gaWRpb3Qh
Biden will trigger DPA, waive tariffs for two years on solar panels to boost productions.  President Biden will invoke the Defense Production Act to spur domestic production of clean energy technology and order a two-year tariff exemption on solar panels imported from Southeast Asian countries in a bid to tackle rising energy prices.  The move will accelerate production of solar panel parts, building insulation, heat pumps that more efficiently regulate the climate in buildings and equipment for making fuel cells and other electricity-generated fuels.  Mr. Biden also will waive tariffs on solar panels imported from four Southeast Asian countries in a move to nudge Americans toward green alternatives amid rising energy prices.

Solar Panels Are Starting to Die, Leaving Behind Toxic Trash.  Solar panels are an increasingly important source of renewable power that will play an essential role in fighting climate change.  They are also complex pieces of technology that become big, bulky sheets of electronic waste at the end of their lives — and right now, most of the world doesn't have a plan for dealing with that.  But we'll need to develop one soon, because the solar e-waste glut is coming.  By 2050, the International Renewable Energy Agency projects that up to 78 million metric tons of solar panels will have reached the end of their life, and that the world will be generating about 6 million metric tons of new solar e-waste annually.  While the latter number is a small fraction of the total e-waste humanity produces each year, standard electronics recycling methods don't cut it for solar panels.  Recovering the most valuable materials from one, including silver and silicon, requires bespoke recycling solutions.  And if we fail to develop those solutions along with policies that support their widespread adoption, we already know what will happen.

Greenpeace's Dream Of A Solar-Powered Village Fell Apart In Just A Few Years.  Eco-activist group Greenpeace brought solar power to Dharnai, India, in 2014, constructing a green micro-grid it said would make the tiny village "energy independent" and a model for the rest of the country to follow.  Eight years later, reports indicate the solar micro-grid is not only defunct, but being used as a cattle shed.  The Dharnai venture is only one of many failed attempts by environmental groups, like Greenpeace, to "green" the developing world, according to one of its co-founders.  "It's the same thing that's happened a lot across Africa:  goody two-shoes comes in and builds them a small solar facility," CO2 Coalition Director Patrick Moore, who co-founded Greenpeace in the 1970s, told The Daily Caller News Foundation.  "Then, pretty soon the battery wears out and it just doesn't get repaired and they don't know what to do because they don't have any expertise," said Moore, who departed Greenpeace in the 1980s after he said the group lost touch with its original purpose.  "There's plenty of those stories."

Tariff battle splits solar energy industry.  A request for new tariffs on solar cell and module imports from Asia is feeding an intraindustry divide between project developers relying heavily on those products and the U.S. manufacturers competing for more market share.  Interest in solar energy is growing as there are more national and corporate commitments to reducing the use of fossil fuels, and domestic cell and module manufacturers want to grow their industrial base to help meet demand.  Meanwhile, those representing the interests of firms engaged in downstream activities, such as panel assembly and installation, say they want more manufacturing growth, too, but they say the tariffs would hurt their businesses.

Mines, Minerals, and "Green" Energy: A Reality Check.  Among the material realities of green energy:
  •   Building wind turbines and solar panels to generate electricity, as well as batteries to fuel electric vehicles, requires, on average, more than 10 times the quantity of materials, compared with building machines using hydrocarbons to deliver the same amount of energy to society.
  •   Oil, natural gas, and coal are needed to produce the concrete, steel, plastics, and purified minerals used to build green machines.  The energy equivalent of 100 barrels of oil is used in the processes to fabricate a single battery that can store the equivalent of one barrel of oil.
  •   By 2050, with current plans, the quantity of worn-out solar panels — much of it nonrecyclable — will constitute double the tonnage of all today's global plastic waste, along with over 3 million tons per year of unrecyclable plastics from worn-out wind turbine blades.  By 2030, more than 10 million tons per year of batteries will become garbage.

California's solar market is now a battery market.  No US state has led the energy transition like California has.  While other states may have higher portions of wind in their electricity mix, at full sun the output of solar panels in California rivals that of Texas wind power.  It has often been the first state in the nation to pass policies that drive the move to renewable energy and electrification, and these policies are regularly imitated elsewhere.  As a result California has been a pioneer for a range of clean energy technologies.  California has also been the first to experience the challenges of the transition.  The state is famous for its "duck curve," where solar floods the grid in midday and forces other sources of power to ramp quickly in the evening to meet demand when the sun goes down.  The responses to this and other challenges in California have taken many forms — including an emphasis on demand response and using imports and gas plants more flexibly.  It has also meant a lot of batteries.

Chemicals used in the manufacture of solar panels.  The main problem with solar arrays is the chemicals needed to process silicate into the silicon used in the panels.  To make pure enough silicon requires processing it with hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, nitric acid, hydrogen fluoride, trichloroethane, and acetone.  In addition, they also need gallium, arsenide, copper-indium-gallium- diselenide, and cadmium-telluride, which also are highly toxic.  Silicon dust is a hazard to the workers, and the panels cannot be recycled.

No Amount Of Incremental Wind And Solar Power Can Ever Provide Energy Independence.  No amount of incremental wind and solar power can ever provide energy independence.  Electricity gets consumed the instant it is generated.  Electricity is consumed all the time, and therefore must be generated all the time.  Indeed, some of the peak times for electricity consumption occur on winter evenings, when the sun has set, temperatures are very cold, the wind is often completely calm, and the need for energy for light, heat, cooking and more are high.  During such times, a combined wind and solar generation system produces zero power.  It doesn't matter if you build a thousand wind turbines and solar panels, or a million, or a billion or a trillion.  The output will still be zero.  And calm winter nights are just the most intense piece of the problem.  A fully wind/solar generation system, with seemingly plenty of "capacity" to meet peak electricity demand, will also regularly and dramatically underproduce at random critical times throughout a year: for example, on heavily overcast and cold winter days; or on calm and hot summer evenings, when the sun has just set and air conditioning demand is high.

Solar Plant Failures.  Recently Crescent Dunes Solar Energy plant operators filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.  After years of accusations of mismanagement and unreliability in providing power, the plant's operator, Tonopah Solar Energy threw in the towel on July 30, 2021 and filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, recording about $430 million in secured debt owed to the US Department of Energy (DOE).  It is seeking a settlement under which DOE will recover less than half of the original loan, around $200 million.  Frequent prolonged outages at the plant reduced the expected amount of energy and credits by 50 percent [in] 2019 and 25% in 2020 and beyond.  Crescent Dunes was selling its power at about $135/MWh, while Techren Solar II in Nevada's Eldorado valley priced its power at approximately $30/MWh.  The death knell sounded last summer with a catastrophic failure of the molten salt storage tanks that caused ground contamination and required the removal of the solar tower.

Solar advocates are squaring off against conservationists.  On one side, fans of solar energy are pushing a cleaner alternative to fossil fuels, with massive solar projects popping up across the United States.  On the other, conservationists and people who live near the solar projects are watching in horror as green fields are filled with rows of silicon solar panels, damaging ecologically sensitive areas.  "It's kind of funny to me that there's environmental resistance to wind and solar, which is an environmental solution," said Michael Webber, a professor of energy resources at the University of Texas at Austin.  But, he added, it's not entirely unexpected as solar has gone from an emerging technology to one that's now more mainstream.  "Any time you do anything at scale, you start to get resistance," Webber said.  "There's resistance to oil and gas, and nuclear and shopping centers.  It's a sign of maturity in solar that, when people want to scale, you get resistance."

Spain's Solar Energy Crisis: 62,000 People Bankrupt After Investing in Solar Panels.  Seventeen years ago, Spain's socialist government decided to inject subsidies into renewable energy.  As a result, thousands of Spanish families massively invested in photovoltaic energy.  But, as you'll see in our report, the dream rapidly turned into a nightmare.  [Video clip]

Maine official warns community solar projects might not be as 'clean' as they suggest.  So you signed up to participate in one of the new "community solar" projects that are popping up around the state, and feeling pretty good about using renewable energy.  Not so fast, though.  One state official says the program's structure can result in customers consuming more fossil-fuel energy than before, potentially undermining Maine's green energy goals.  Since lawmakers authorized the community solar program in 2019, thousands of Maine residents and organizations have signed up to make payments that help finance the development, construction and operation of midsize solar power plants.  In return, they will receive per-kilowatt-hour credits on their electricity bills that should save them money overall.

California's Solar-Power Welfare State.  The dirty little secret about green energy subsidies is that they are welfare for the wealthy.  And like any entitlement, they are hard to reform once people get hooked.  Witness the revolt by the rich against a California proposal to scale back subsidies for rooftop-solar panels.  At issue is the state's net-metering program that rebates homeowners with solar panels for the excess power they generate and send to the grid.  Utilities compensate solar customers at the retail electricity rate, which can be up to 10 times the wholesale price that other power generators are paid.

Big Oil Absorbs Big Solar.  [Scroll down]  As renewable energy sources continue to expand globally, so-called "Big Energy" corporations are taking notice... and investing big.  Just last month, oil giant Shell announced that it was purchasing 100% of Savion, a U.S.-based solar and energy storage company. [...] Not to be outdone, BP acquired renewables technology company Blueprint Power in October, invested $220 million in U.S. solar projects in July (while also buying Open Energi, another renewables tech company), and has made a slew of other investments in "green energy."  Ditto for Chevron.  Each example is indicative of a broader trend of fossil fuel giants diversifying their energy portfolio to accommodate (and profit from) the expansion of carbon-neutral energy production.  Thus, declaring the "beginning of the end for Big Oil" is a mischaracterization; Big Oil is simply rebranding itself as Big Solar.  Given the tremendous financial resources, energy infrastructure, and technical expertise of our major oil corporations, it seems almost inevitable that any transition to renewables will ultimately go through them, whether the activist left likes it or not.

Biden picks climate agenda over manufacturing allies on solar tariff loophole.  President Joe Biden extended the Trump-era tariffs on solar-energy imports by four years Friday but dealt a blow to U.S. solar manufacturers by leaving in place an exemption that has allowed imports of panel technologies subsidized by China to flood the market.  The decision is a boon for renewable energy developers who will retain access to cheap overseas supplies, specifically the two-sided solar panels used by most large-scale solar projects, helping meet the administration's climate targets.  For U.S. solar manufacturers and union labor, who favored restrictions to safeguard American jobs, the move is a disappointment.

Unreliability makes solar power impossibly expensive.  [Scroll down]  For a start we will simply consider what a stand alone 1,000 MW solar system with battery storage requires for reliability.  The 1,000 MW is power reliably delivered to the grid around the clock. [...] For simplicity let us first assume 8 hours of full sun and full power every day.  Clearly we need 16 hours of storage every night.  That is 16,000 MWh of battery storage.  We also need another 2,000 MW of generating capacity to charge the batteries every day.  So the full sun requirements are 3,000 MW of solar generating capacity and 16,000 MWh of storage capacity, in order to reliable generate 1,000 MW around the clock.  Solar generating capacity can be drastically reduced on dark cloudy days.  When very cloudy the output can be reduced to just 10% of nameplate capacity.  Dark cloudiness can last for days, thus requiring more battery backup along with the generating capacity to charge these dark days batteries.  How many successive days of dark cloudiness to design for is a complex question of local and regional meteorology.

When the Wind Doesn't Blow.  The political push to transform our electrical grid into reliance on "renewable" wind and solar energy keeps running into the laws of physics.  The laws of physics are going to win, but the economic carnage in the meantime will be terrible.  [Chart]  The basic point here is that wind energy shows up only sporadically and unpredictably, and tends to disappear when it is needed the most.  The worst time for a blackout is when the mercury is at -20, as it was yesterday where I live.  Note where electricity was actually coming from in the chart above:  coal, the dark brown line, was the principal source, while natural gas, the light brown line, is only slightly behind.  These are the sources that liberals want to do away with.  Wind was flighty; sometimes it worked, but often it didn't.  Is that how you want your light switches to operate?  And if you can find solar energy on this chart, a technology in which many billions of dollars have been invested, your eyes are sharper than mine.

It wasn't very windy this morning, and that's a problem.  It is a well-understood phenomenon that wind generation in the Midwest essentially disappears when the mercury dips below -22° F.  Electricity generation from wind turbines drops under these circumstances because wind turbines are programmed to automatically shut off when the temperatures get this cold to prevent them from breaking.  Ironically, wind turbines are actually net consumers of power during these periods because they have electric heaters installed in the gearboxes to keep the oil inside the wind turbines from freezing.  Hourly data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration shows wind production plummeted yesterday as the temperatures dropped overnight.  Falling wind output resulted in an increase in coal, natural gas, and oil generation.

The Uselessness of Solar Energy.  You sometimes see newspaper headlines to the effect that, say, a "50 megawatt solar power plant" is being constructed.  But you shouldn't count on getting anything remotely approaching 50 megawatts of power from such an installation. [... Also] bear in mind that while northern states get fewer hours of sunlight than southern states in the winter, they get more hours of sunlight in the summer.  And note that in the best of times, solar panels don't produce electricity anywhere near half the time. [...] That is pathetic.  We spend billions of dollars on solar panels and transmission lines, and in winter, when we need energy the most, they work only around ten percent of the time.

Paving Virginia with solar slabs is bad law.  The ill-conceived Virginia Clean Economy Act (VCEA) has created an enormous stampede of proposed solar projects.  The lineup of "subsidy farms" in progress is breathtaking.  It is also stupid.  The numbers are incredible.  Here are the ugly basics:  780 square miles of solar slabs so far and the list is growing.  That is about 500,000 acres of countryside, farmland or forests destroyed and paved over.  Roughly 500 separate projects blanketing much of rural Virginia.  Requiring a staggering 160 million solar panels, mostly from China and all destined to become hundreds of tons of toxic waste.  The gruesome details are available on a county by county basis.

Green energy?  Solar toys won't cut it.  By the time solar energy reaches Earth's surface, it is spread very thin — even midday sunshine will not boil the billy or make toast.  And solar collectors will convert only about 20% of that weak energy into electricity.  Thus, thousands of solar panels are needed to collect significant energy, and lots more to charge the expensive batteries needed to maintain electricity supply overnight and during cloudy weather.  Despite these disadvantages, force-feeding of "green" energy by all levels of government has given Australia nearly three million solar collectors (mainly imported from China).  It requires scads of land to generate significant electricity from the sun's weak rays.  But even in sunny weather, they produce nothing for sixteen hours every day.

Solar to start new year with some long shadows.  Rooftop solar companies aren't exactly starting out the new year with the sun shining on their faces.  Shares of residential solar companies Sunrun and Sunnova have fallen 19% and 14%, respectively, since the California Public Utilities Commission put subsidies for rooftop solar-known as net metering — on the chopping block in December.  The commission plans to vote on Jan. 27 after taking public comments.  Florida is also considering legislation that would cut such subsidies.

Yet Another Solar Scam.  What follows is my educated opinion.  The Heliogen company is a provider of "artificial intelligence enabled" solar power.  They just received an award from the Department of Energy to build a prototype plant that generates electricity.  As a student of solar energy and the author of the book Dumb Energy, my opinion is that this is another solar energy scheme designed to vacuum up government and private money.  Heliogen is promoting concentrated solar power or CSP.  CSP uses optical methods, generally mirrors, to concentrate sunlight so that high temperatures can be obtained.  If you ever used a magnifying glass to start a fire you were using CSP. [...] Concentrated solar power is not new and has never been remotely practical.  The Ivanpah CSP plant in California near the Nevada border is [an example].  The towers are illuminated by sunlight directed by thousands of motorized mirrors that track the sun and direct the sunlight to the towers.  The intensity of the sunlight on the towers is hundreds of times stronger than the sunlight falling on the ground.  Water circulating through a boiler in each tower is turned into high pressure steam used to power a turbine and electrical generator.  The electricity is only generated during the day and at a cost around 5 times as much as using natural gas.  The plant cost about $2 billion.

Renewables' Reckoning Is Long Overdue.  It's not just that renewables are so intermittent and unreliable that they must be legislated and subsidized; eat up land; will require more storage than physically possible; have nearly bankrupted and blacked out Germany with little emissions improvement; and are doing the same to California and other jurisdictions adopting mandates.  Despite these indisputable truths, the White House's policy remains "a carbon pollution-free electricity sector" by 2035 and "net-zero emissions economy-wide" by 2050.  Yet three additional existential threats must and will lay the renewables narrative bare.  The first was reflected in Joe Biden's recent signing of the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act.  Forty-five percent of the worldwide supply of solar-grade polysilicon stems from China's Xinjiang region, where it is reportedly largely produced by enslaved Uyghurs, Kazakhs and other Turkic Muslims.  (China overall produces three-quarters of polysilicon and 95% of solar wafers.)

California plans to kill the residential solar industry.  Admittedly, this isn't going to be a post that's of interest to everyone.  It's primarily of interest to me because a) I live in California and b) this summer I had a Tesla solar system installed on my roof.  And now, just months after I had that installed, the state is planning to change the incentives offered to homeowners in what is effectively a tax on solar.  Why would a state completely run by Democrats want to make it less likely for people to install home solar?  Because they need more money of course.

Biden Megadonor Scores $500 Million Federal Loan for Solar Company.  A solar energy company owned by a Biden megadonor received a $500 million government loan to build a manufacturing facility in India, the Biden administration announced this week, raising questions about whether the company's political clout played any role in the financing decision.  The U.S. International Development Finance Corporation granted the loan to First Solar, which is owned by billionaire Walmart heir Lukas Walton, to build a solar module plant in India.  Walton contributed over $300,000 to President Joe Biden's campaign last year, and over $100,000 to the Democratic National Committee, according to campaign finance records.  The loan to First Solar is the "largest single debt financing transaction" issued by the DFC, the agency announced this week.

Solar Energy Isn't Always As Green As You Think.  Solar panels glimmering in the sun are an icon of all that is green.  But while generating electricity through photovoltaics is indeed better for the environment than burning fossil fuels, several incidents have linked the manufacture of these shining symbols of environmental virtue to a trail of chemical pollution.  And it turns out that the time it takes to compensate for the energy used and the greenhouse gases emitted in photovoltaic panel production varies substantially by technology and geography.  That's the bad news.  The good news is that the industry could readily eliminate many of the damaging side effects that do exist.  Indeed, pressure for it to do so is mounting, in part because, since 2008, photovoltaics manufacturing has moved from Europe, Japan, and the United States to China, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Taiwan; today nearly half the world's photovoltaics are manufactured in China.  As a result, although the overall track record for the industry is good, the countries that produce the most photovoltaics today typically do the worst job of protecting the environment and their workers.

That Dirty Green Energy.  In this editorial, we will focus on solar, just to keep things short.  Solar power depends on photovoltaic panels, which convert sunlight to electricity.  Those panels, indispensable to the process, are where solar power's green reputation breaks down.  To start with, solar panels have a lifespan of roughly 25 to 30 years, so at some point, they become trash.  (For the record, powering the world with solar energy would require more than 51 billion panels, which would take up more than 115,000 square miles, a parcel of land larger than Arizona.  There are nearly 1.5 million panels right now in the lower 48.)  What do we do with them?  Solar panels are recyclable — technically.  But "the process in which materials are separated can be tedious and requires advanced machinery," says CED Greentech, which means energy will be burned to extract the components.  Consequently, most dead solar panels, which are in fact considered hazardous waste, end up in landfills.  Which isn't green at all, since the greens despise landfills.

Some Louisa County farmers say a solar energy project is destroying their properties.  Louisa County resident Bobby] Marks has always called Louisa County home.  "This property has been in our family for four generations," Marks said.  "We own about 265 acres of farmland, pasture land woodland combined.  No price on it.  It's valuable to us."  Marks takes pride in his Bickley Road property, as does fellow farmer Dewey Collier III.  However, they say with each rain their land is being threatened by their new neighbor.  "If they want a solar field back there, that's their property and their business," Collier III said.  "But when you destroy surrounding land, then it becomes our business."

The Real Cost of Government Mandated Wind and Solar.  The government and big financial institutions promote a fraudulent analysis of the cost of solar and wind electricity.  Their narrative is that wind and solar are competitive with traditional fossil fuels and that the cost of wind and solar is rapidly dropping.  Academics and the media amplify and spread the fraudulent analysis.  The basis of the fraud is a simple comparison of the cost per kilowatt hour at the plant fence for electricity produced by wind or solar versus electricity produced by a traditional plant.  Some or all of the massive subsidies for wind and solar are ignored in such comparisons.  With such a rigged comparison, wind or solar may seem competitive.  A proper comparison reveals that wind or solar are five or even ten times more expensive than natural gas or coal electricity.

Biden Chief of Staff Backs Green Energy Despite His Costly Role in Solyndra Scandal.  [I]n August, the Democrat-controlled House passed a Biden-backed $3.5 trillion budget framework encompassing many "Green New Deal" initiatives such as a "Climate Corps" and a program to encourage utilities to sell carbon-free energy.  [White House chief of staff Ron] Klain enthusiastically predicted success with green energy in the last Democratic administration's $535 million loan guarantee for Solyndra, a politically connected company that made solar panels.  That decision became one of the most embarrassing scandals of President Barack Obama's two terms.  Government documents — some long public, others obtained by The Daily Signal in a Freedom of Information Act request — tell the story of how immersed Klain was in pushing taxpayer dollars to a company that soon collapsed.  The Solyndra mess became symbolic of crony capitalism and climate boondoggles.

Virginia preservationists fight to save Civil War sites from solar energy execs.  The speed limit sign posted inside the barbed wire fence says 15 miles per hour.  If you are driving over unmarked graves it is best to proceed with caution, all the better to avoid the yellow excavator bucket lying idle on the gravel roadway.  Tree saplings have been planted the length of the perimeter to eventually obscure from public view hundreds of solar panels that rest on what was once a landscape of misery for boys from Georgia and Pennsylvania.  The field, known as Savage's Station, owes its name to the at least 900 Union and Confederate soldiers who killed each other here in Henrico County in 1862.  The site is now filled with the ambitions of environmentalists, politicians, and solar energy executives.

Exploding birds on solar farms not a myth after all.  U.S. Rep. Louis Gohmert, R-Texas, recently discussed a problem with solar projects in which birds fly into the path of the sun reflected from those huge mirrors, and ignite on fire, exploding in mid-air.  "Low-rent far-left" media outlets mocked him.  Claimed Raw Story, "Gohmert's bird rant is yet another recent example of the congressman's penchant for latching onto any conspiracy theory or right-wing talking point under the sun."  Crooks and Liars was equally blunt:  "Listen, people.  Birds who have Windmill Cancer are already vulnerable to spontaneous combustion under normal circumstances.  Everyone knows that, because I made it up there when I typed it just then.  And birds who survive all the treatments for Windmill Cancer shouldn't be flying from California to Nevada anyhow, because they're just taking unnecessary chances with their nine lives."  Online commenters held back nothing:  "Birds exploding in mid air?  You have to be one of the stupidest persons I have every come across," claimed Tom Kirkman.  Lennie Seaman added, "Exploding birds?  Did you not go to school when you were still capable of rational thought?"  However, the problem that remained was that Gohmert's concerns were true, and valid.

Green Technologies Cause Massive Waste and Pollution.  Solar panels are mostly made of glass, which has low value as a recycled material, but they also have small amounts of silicon, silver, and copper as well as heavy metals (cadmium, lead, etc.) that some governments classify as hazardous waste.  Hazardous waste can only be transported at designated times and via select routes.  Because solar panels are delicate and bulky, specialized labor is required to detach and remove them to avoid their shattering and polluting local areas. [...] The U.S. government does not have a PV recycling policy and as such most solar waste ends up in landfills after cables and aluminum frames are removed.  States have not been addressing the problem adequately, either.  First Solar is the only U.S. solar panel manufacturer that has a recycling program, which applies only to its own products.

Solar Panel Toxicity Overview:  When potential solar project host communities ask solar developers what toxic materials are in their solar panels, they typically say that they are not aware of any.  Although that may seem evasive, it may be an accurate response as:
  a)  most solar panels come from China,
  b)  China does not have anywhere near the environmental concern that we do, and
  c)  Chinese suppliers are unlikely to divulge negative information about their products.
The takeaway is:  buyer beware.  In other words, potential host communities for industrial solar facilities should be aware of what we do know — and then act accordingly to fully protect their community.

The lurking threat to solar power's growth.  A few lonely academics have been warning for years that solar power faces a fundamental challenge that could halt the industry's breakneck growth.  Simply put: the more solar you add to the grid, the less valuable it becomes.  The problem is that solar panels generate lots of electricity in the middle of sunny days, frequently more than what's required, driving down prices — sometimes even into negative territory.  Unlike a natural gas plant, solar plant operators can't easily throttle electricity up and down as needed, or space generation out through the day, night and dark winter.  It's available when it's available, which is when the sun is shining.  And that's when all the other solar plants are cranking out electricity at maximum levels as well.  A new report finds that California, which produces one of the largest shares of solar power in the world, is already acutely experiencing this phenomenon, known as solar value deflation.

Now is the Time to Get Serious About Nuclear Energy.  In a recent Wall Street Journal article, "Solar Power's Land Grab Hits a Snag:  Environmentalists," Samantha Gross of the Brookings Institution writes, "An energy system based on renewables is still an industrial-scale system, with large generation and transmission projects that people don't necessarily want in their neighborhoods."  Mojave solar farms essentially displace the animals that were living there.  Indian tribes have also protested against the projects.  Several of the largest projects in the planning stages are in jeopardy of cancellation.  In contrast, for access, oil and natural gas require only a 12-inch hole in the ground.

Why Everything They Said About Solar Was Wrong.  [A] major new study of the economics of solar, published in Harvard Business Review (HBR), finds that the waste produced by solar panels will make electricity from solar panels four times more expensive than the world's leading energy analysts thought. [...] Conventional wisdom today holds that the world will quadruple the number of solar panels in the world over the next decade.  "And that's not even taking into consideration the further impact of possible new regulations and incentives launched by the green-friendly Biden administration," Atasu, Wassenhove, and Duran write in HBR.  But the volume of solar panel waste will destroy the economics of solar even with the subsidies, they say.  "By 2035," write the three economists, "discarded panels would outweigh new units sold by 2.56 times.  In turn, this would catapult the LCOE (levelized cost of energy, a measure of the overall cost of an energy-producing asset over its lifetime) to four times the current projection."  The solar industry, and even supposedly neutral energy agencies, grossly underestimated how much waste solar panels would produce.

The blackout agenda.  Solar power fails every day from sunset to sunrise as well as during rain, hail, snow, or dust storms.  No matter how much land we smother in subsidized solar panels, they will still fail.  Wind power fails often and unpredictably, sometimes for days, especially in quiet cold winter weather.  It also shuts down during cyclones, heavy winds or icy conditions.  No matter how many hills we uglify with their subsidized roads, transmission lines, and bird-slicers, they will still fail.  No one notices when green energy fails (as it often does) because coal, gas and hydro keep the lights and heaters on, trains running, petrol pumping, batteries charging and dairies, abattoirs and hospitals operating. [...] Hyped energy "solutions" to intermittent green energy include big batteries, Snowy 2 pumped hydro and hydrogen.  These all consume more energy than they can produce; and more green fashion accessories like electric cars will quickly suck the whole electricity network dry.

The Dirty Secret of 'Clean' Energy.  President Biden pledged to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions by at least 50 percent by 2030 from 2005 levels.  An estimate shows that to reach this ambitious goal, at least half of the U.S. power supply would have to come from clean energy such as solar and wind.  However, one dirty secret that President Biden and his green allies don't want to talk about is how "clean" solar energy is largely built on forced labor in Xinjiang, China, according to a new investigative report by U.K.'s Sheffield Hallam University.

Report:  The Case for Reform of Solar Energy Planning.  Current guidance in the planning system relating to ground-mounted solar projects is around ten years old and obsolete.  Guidance relating to solar power does not give ordinary agricultural land — categories Agricultural Land Classification Grade 3b and below — its due weight in the planning balance, even though such land is preferred for some purposes and valuable, both for reasons of food production, reduction of food miles, and the associated carbon footprint.  The lack of protection for such land constitutes a loophole in the system, since developers find it relatively easy to secure permission to change the use of large areas of land from agricultural to industrial; consequently there is a strong trend towards mega-scale solar projects, some covering thousands of acres.

Soaring Solar Costs Could Slow The Renewable Boom.  This year looked like it would be a... windfall... for renewable energy companies with the advent of the Biden Administration and its massively expensive clean energy push.  Nevertheless, solar is getting left behind unexpectedly.  Year-to-date, solar module prices have risen 18 percent after consecutive years of falling into the mainstream's grasp.  One element in the solar module equation is to blame: polysilicon.  Polysilicon (known more formally as polycrystalline silicon) is a high-purity form of silicon that is a fundamental ingredient in solar photovoltaic (PV) manufacturing.  It serves as a feedstock for the production of today's solar cells.  Polysilicon is witnessing a severe supply squeeze.  This is great for suppliers but not so great for solar manufacturers.

Solar farms:  A toxic blot on the landscape.  Environmental lobbyists argue that solar energy is a crucial part of a sustainable future, but they talk less about the growing doubts raised by scientists and angry groups of residents.  Because, apart from ruining the view, solar panels are also woefully inefficient at their only job — which is to generate electricity amid the cloud and rain of north-west Europe.  Then there is the question of disposal.  The materials the panels are made with have a life expectancy of less than 50 years and are difficult and expensive to recycle, raising the prospect of discarded panel mountains leaking dangerous heavy metals.  And with the majority of panels now made in China, there are fears — all too plausible — that some have been produced in forced labour camps, including those where members of the oppressed Uighur minority are imprisoned.

The huge, destructive green lie.  [Scroll down]  Recycling solar panels is going to be a huge problem, too, as they have a lifespan of about 30 years.  Not many have reached that point, but it's coming, and soon.  Wind turbines are a bit less dicey.  They just seem to cause a huge amount of landfills, as opposed to toxics.  This means some creative minds will figure out something good to do with them... maybe.  The only thing propping up the green movement that I can see is politics and "free" (taxpayer) money to subsidize it.

Batteries are fossil fuel, too!
The Hidden Risks of Batteries.  The meteoric rise of lithium-ion batteries in the transport and IT sectors has been spurred by demand for technologies that reduce carbon emissions and decrease energy use.  While this sounds like a win for everyone, there's a darker side that could alter the perceptions of ethically minded consumers and create significant risks for brands.  If you look at the production of cobalt and lithium used in these batteries, a stark picture emerges of an industry exposed to issues such as child labor, modern slavery, and the undermining of land and water rights.  Demand for these raw materials is set to grow significantly.

Know Your Supplier:  Why We Should Not Buy Cheap Chinese Solar Panels.  The Biden Administration is promoting the participation of Chinese President Xi Jinping in a White House climate summit at a time when Congress is considering whether or not to halt the import of solar panels from China for human rights reasons.  "China's Solar Dominance Presents Biden With an Ugly Dilemma," read the headline of a New York Times article published yesterday [4/21/2021].  "President Biden's vow to work with China on issues like climate change is clashing with his promise to defend human rights."

Solar panels manufactured by firms linked to Chinese slave labor.  Solar projects commissioned by the Ministry of Defence, the government's Coal Authority, United Utilities and some of the UK's biggest renewable energy developers are using panels made by Chinese solar companies accused of exploiting forced labour camps in Xinjiang province, a Guardian investigation has found.  Confidential industry data suggests that up to 40% of the UK's solar farms were built using panels manufactured by China's biggest solar panel companies, including Jinko Solar, JA Solar and Trina Solar.  These firms have been named in a recent report on the internment of more than 1 million men and women from the Muslim Uyghur community, in what UK MPs on Thursday voted to describe as genocide.

Why Wind and Solar Energy Are Doomed to Failure.  Wind and solar energy are both essentially obsolete technologies.  There is a reason why only the very rich or the very adventurous sail across oceans:  the wind is unreliable, and at best produces relatively little energy.  Nevertheless, liberals have concocted fantasies whereby all of our electricity, or perhaps our entire economy, will be powered by those fickle sources.  There are a number of reasons why this will never happen, but a paper published last week by Center of the American Experiment argues that land use constraints are the most basic reason why wind and solar are inexorably destined to fail.

Wind and Solar Potentially Aren't Climate Cure-Alls.  Perhaps the most obvious criticism of renewables is their intermittent nature, or as Fergus calls them "unreliable".  Solar panels clearly don't work when it's dark and wind turbines don't turn when it isn't windy, but the problem goes far deeper than this.  Solar energy is fundamentally at odds with our energy usage patterns, being offline when we're making dinner and watching tv after work.  On overcast days when we're more likely to be inside production levels fall, and that's nothing on the scale of capacity issues caused by snow.  Even the ambitious plans for huge desert solar arrays face repeated cleaning to remove sand from the panel surfaces.  The real issue with solar, however, is seasonality.  In the Northern Hemisphere during winter, when the earth is angled away from the sun, there is a 50% decrease in solar power production.  The only solution to this requires either twice the number of panels, half of which will be excess capacity in the summer, or having back-up power stations that will remain idle for half the year.

Re-Evaluating Solar Photovoltaic Power:  Fourteen Serious Ecological Impacts of Solar.  Even when reality is harsh, I prefer it. [...] The illusion that we're doing good when we're actually causing harm is not constructive.  With reality, discovering true solutions becomes possible.  As extreme weather events (caused, at least in part, by fossil fuels' greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions) challenge electrical infrastructures, we need due diligent evaluations that help us adapt to increasingly unpredictable situations — and drastically reduce greenhouse gas emissions and ecological damage.  I have a hard time imagining a future without electricity, refrigerators, stoves, washing machines, phones and vehicles.  I also know that producing and disposing of manufactured goods ravages the Earth.  Internationally, governments are investing in solar photovoltaics (PVs) because they promise less ecological impacts than other fuel sources.

Joe Biden Pledges to Make Solar Panels More Environmentally Toxic.  If you thought Arsenic doped Silicon or Gallium Arsenide on your roof was bad, how about solar cells made of organic Lead compounds, or Cadmium Telluride?  Biden's quest for cheaper solar is exploring some truly terrifying photovoltaic innovations. [...] Rechargeable batteries used to contain Cadmium, it was discontinued because Cadmium is horribly toxic. less than half a gram of Cadmium in your system will really mess up your day.  Symptoms include cancer, "Cadmium Blues" (persistent flu like symptoms), renal failure, softening of the bones, emphysema and respiratory damage.  Can you imagine having several pounds of Cadmium on your roof?  What if your neighbour's solar powered rooftop catches fire?  Tellurium is unpleasant, though it does not seem as toxic as Cadmium.  At least people seem to recover from Tellurium poisoning.

US Solar facilities kill tens of thousands of birds every year.  America's solar farms have a bird problem.  Utility companies have been finding bird carcasses littering the ground at their facilities for years, a strange and unexpected consequence of the national solar boom.  No one was quite sure why this was happening, but it was clearly a problem for a type of energy that was billed as being environmentally friendly.  So in 2013, a group of utilities, academics, and environmental organizations came together to form the Avian Solar Working Group to develop strategies to mitigate avian deaths at solar facilities around the US.  "There was very little research about the impacts of solar on birds," says Misti Sporer, the lead environmental scientist at Duke Energy, an electric utility in North Carolina, and member of the working group.  "What does it mean when you find a dead bird?  Nobody really knew."  But simply getting the data on avian deaths at solar facilities proved challenging.  In 2016, a first-of-its-kind study estimated that the hundreds of utility-scale solar farms around the US may kill nearly 140,000 birds annually.

Those millions of new 'green' jobs are going to China and India.  When U.S. "Special Envoy" for Climate John Kerry recently urged workers upset by the Biden administration's decision to scuttle the Keystone XL pipeline to "learn to make solar panels", he was oblivious to the fact that China and India dominate the solar panel manufacturing market.  President Joe Biden's Build Back Better Recovery Plan is to build a modern, resilient climate infrastructure that will create millions of good-paying union jobs, but Biden, like Kerry, may not be aware of America being unable to financially compete with the world's solar panel manufacturing markets without huge government subsidies.  China and India not only control the supply chain of materials for solar panels, wind turbines, and EV batteries, but also have the least stringent environmental controls for the mining of the renewable materials like lithium, cobalt, nickel, graphite, copper, and many others, and minimal labor laws for their low-cost labor supply.

Solar Makes No Sense, But It Makes Money.  Utility scale solar installations make no sense in Western New York.  The energy industry standard of energy efficiency is called "Energy Returned on Energy Invested" (ERoEI). Consider the energy expended to manufacture, transport, install and decommission utility scale solar compared to the amount of electricity New York solar can produce.  As Documented by Forbes Magazine, industrial solar at this latitude falls below the "economically viable threshold".  Industrial solar is rated at four compared to nuclear at 75 on a Forbes ERoEI graph showing energy produced related to energy invested.  Why would policy makers encourage a project that uses more energy to build than it can produce in its lifetime?

Toward a Renewable Chaos:  Carbon Imperialism and Disadvantaged Smaller Nations.  [W]ind and solar make up an insignificant percentage of the world's energy consumption.  The renewable contribution to global energy consumption in 2017 was less than 2%.  Solar and wind contributed just 7% of the world's electricity in 2018.  There is a reason for that.  Besides being expensive, they are highly intermittent and so are unreliable.  Further, wind and solar power cannot be used without backup by fossil fuel-powered energy sources.  Even in Germany, increased reliance on wind and solar has resulted in energy chaos.  Berlin is facing energy shortages as both wind and solar have failed during the ongoing winter, and coal plants are running at full capacity to meet the demand.  "With this supply of wind and photovoltaic energy, it's between 0 and 2 or 3 percent — that is de facto zero.  You can see it in many diagrams that we have days, weeks, in the year where we have neither wind nor PV.  Especially this time (winter) for example — there is no wind and PV, and there are often times when the wind is very miniscule.  These are things, I must say, that have been physically established and known for centuries, and we've simply totally neglected this during the green energies discussion," said Dr. Harald Schwarz, professor of power distribution at the University of Cottbus.

Get ready for more Obama-era green energy scams.  With Democrats about to control all the levers of power in Washington, the biggest winners might be the wind and solar companies.  These firms' stocks continue to surge mostly because President-elect Joe Biden has pledged to invest several hundred billion dollars in green energy through a pipeline of taxpayer-funded grants, loans, tax credits and loan guarantees.  This game plan looks suspiciously like a replay of the litany of green "stimulus" fiascoes that Biden piloted as vice president back in 2009 with the $800 billion Obama stimulus plan.  The experiment in the government as an investment banker belly-flopped with embarrassing failures from Solyndra, Fisker Automotive and Abound Solar.  Taxpayers lost billions of dollars on these lemons.

We Don't Need No Stinking Giant Mirrors.  [Tweet]  A Medicine Hat solar thermal project was demolished for scrap last week after the city, fed gov, and provincial carbon tax fund invested a total of $13M into the project.  After an unsuccessful trial, Medicine Hat was unable to sell off the equipment.

75 Megawatt Solar = 7.5 Million to Decomission in 2020 dollars.  Last evening [10/21/2020], Municipal Land-Use Planner Larry Lahr exposed Mt Joy Twp and its Zoning Officer for not having the legal or ethical authority to waive the ordinance requirements of Chapter 81 stormwater management for this conditional-use application.  Followed by expert testimony from NC State Mechanical Engineer Dr. Herbert Eckerlin that analyzed and cross-referenced several decommissioning formulas to arrive at approximately 7.5 million to remove this proposed solar facility and restore 600 acres of land back to its original condition, at today's dollars.

The Rooftop Solar Scam and How to Get Rid of It.  Residential solar is a disaster for the electric utility.  Once the customer installs solar, the utility loses almost all its revenue but keeps nearly all its expenses.  The expenses are maintaining a connection to the customer's house including the distribution system that carries electricity from the generating plants to the customer.  The generating plants still have to be ready to provide regular quantities of electricity to each solar homeowner as soon as the sun sets and whenever it is cloudy.  The only saving for the electric utility is reduced fuel consumption in its generating plants when fossil fuel electricity is displaced by solar electricity.  That expense is minor part of the expenses associated with servicing a typical homeowner.  The electric utilities are forced to engage in net metering programs by politicians.  The politicians are driven by homeowners looking for a bargain and by the residential solar installation industry.

Biden's Energy Plan:  Sacrificing Goats to the Sun Gods.  Wind and solar cannot be the instrument to achieve the (unnecessary) goal of 100% zero carbon electricity by 2035.  Wind and solar are erratic and unpredictable sources of electricity.  As long as wind and solar supply less than about 25% of the electricity in a grid, the grid can handle the erratic energy supply by throttling backup plants, usually natural gas plants, up and down to compensate for the ups and downs of wind or solar.  When wind and solar go past the approximate 25% threshold, spells of excess wind and solar power appear.  The problem is that wind and solar power are peaky, with peaks 3 to 5 times the average power.  It may be possible at times to accept 80% wind and solar in some grids.  But a significant amount of traditional power plants have to be online to provide regulation and compensate for the seesawing wind and solar.  To get past the 25% wall requires some storage of electricity to flatten out the peaks.  But battery storage is horribly expensive, easily doubling the cost of wind and solar.

The Real Cost of Wind and Solar.  The main problem with either wind or solar is that they generate electricity erratically, depending on the wind or sunshine.  In contrast, a fossil-fuel plant can generate electricity predictably upon request.  Blackouts are very expensive for society, so grid operators and designers go to a lot of trouble to make sure that blackouts are rare. [...] Both wind and solar have pronounced seasonality.  During low output times, as for summer wind, the fossil-fuel plants are carrying more of the load.  Of course, solar stops working as the sun sets. [...] Even very sunny southwest cities have 50 or more cloudy days per year, stopping or reducing solar generation. [...] The big picture is that when wind or solar is added to a grid it is supplemental power.  No coal or gas plants are eliminated.

Green Energy Isn't So Green.  [T]here's an ever-growing landfill of evidence that the so-called Green Revolution is also an extraordinarily toxic and wasteful one.  Columnist Michael Shellenberger called our attention to green energy's dirty little secret in 2018 when he asked a simple question:  "If solar panels are so clean, why do they produce so much toxic waste?"  Shellenberger cited a 2016 International Renewable Energy Agency estimate that there were approximately 275,000 tons of solar panel waste worldwide at that time — a figure the agency says could reach more than 85 million tons by 2050.  He also cited research scientists at the German Stuttgart Institute for Photovoltaics who wrote, "Contrary to previous assumptions, pollutants such as lead or carcinogenic cadmium can be almost completely washed out of the fragments of solar modules over a period of several months, for example by rainwater."

Solar power plunges as smoke shrouds California.  Smoke from California's monstrous wildfires has turned the color of the skies into a doomsday reddish-brown — and slashed the output of the state's array of solar power installations, by far the largest in the nation.  Shortly after noon yesterday, statewide solar generation recorded by the California Independent System Operator was almost one-third below the levels reported on many days in the summer, before the outbreaks of fires last month.  Wind from offshore has pushed smoke into areas where solar installations are concentrated.  "We are seeing reductions to behind-the-meter and large-scale solar throughout the state," said California ISO spokeswoman Anne Gonzales.

Solar panels are starting to die.  What will we do with the megatons of toxic trash?  Solar panels are an increasingly important source of renewable power that will play an essential role in fighting climate change.  They are also complex pieces of technology that become big, bulky sheets of electronic waste at the end of their lives — and right now, most of the world doesn't have a plan for dealing with that.  But we'll need to develop one soon, because the solar e-waste glut is coming.  By 2050, the International Renewable Energy Agency projects that up to 78 million metric tons of solar panels will have reached the end of their life, and that the world will be generating about 6 million metric tons of new solar e-waste annually.  While the latter number is a small fraction of the total e-waste humanity produces each year, standard electronics recycling methods don't cut it for solar panels.  Recovering the most valuable materials from one, including silver and silicon, requires bespoke recycling solutions.  And if we fail to develop those solutions along with policies that support their widespread adoption, we already know what will happen.

Turns Out Green Energy Is A Dirty Business.  We argued last week that California's blackouts offered a grim preview of the left's energy agenda.  But that's only part of the carefully concealed truth about renewables.  Those solar panels so precious to the you-must-conform green-shirts are a particularly nasty environmental menace. [...] Left out of the often mistaken, never-in-doubt assertions of renewables' unalloyed goodness is the fact that the hardware used is hardly renewable.  It wears out and needs to be replaced.  Then what?  "The problem of solar panel disposal 'will explode with full force in two or three decades and wreck the environment' because it 'is a huge amount of waste and they are not easy to recycle,'" writes energy analyst Michael Shellenberger, quoting a Chinese recycling official.

The Plague of Renewable Portfolio Standards.  At a modern natural gas generating plant, two thirds of the cost is capital, and one third is fuel.  If you idle the plant because at a particular time there is no market for the electricity, two thirds of your costs keep on running.  At a nuclear plant, fuel is extremely cheap.  Nearly all the cost is capital or staffing, and nearly all the costs continue if the plant is idle.  Idling a nuclear plant saves practically nothing.  That gives a clue why nuclear plants generally run flat out, turned on more than 90% of the time.  With a wind or solar generating plant, nearly all the cost is capital.  If you turn off wind or solar generation, because there is no market, all your expenses turn into losses.  Wind or solar plants, usually, can be turned off on command, but they can't be turned on unless the wind is blowing or the sun is shining.  They are erratic generators.  Not only can you not be sure of turning them on when needed, but they are liable to turn off by themselves because the wind died or a cloud moved in front of the sun.

Megatons of Solar Panel trash coming to a dump near you soon.  Solar panels need a special kind of recycling that costs 4 to 8 times as much as the recycled bits and bobs are worth.  And the first major generation of solar panels will hit their use-by date soon. [...] In the EU the producers have to recycle the panels they make.  Rules to deal with solar remnants are apparently in progress in Australia, India and Japan, but there are almost none in the USA.

That Dirty Green Energy.  We argued last week that California's blackouts offered a grim preview of the left's energy agenda.  But that's only part of the carefully concealed truth about renewables.  Those solar panels so precious to the you-must-conform greenshirts are a particularly nasty environmental menace. [...] In his 2018 Forbes column headlined "If Solar Panels Are So Clean, Why Do They Produce So Much Toxic Waste?" [Michael] Shellenberger also quotes a four-decade veteran of America's solar industry, who said "the reality is that there is a problem now, and it's only going to get larger, expanding as rapidly as the PV industry expanded 10 years ago"; and researchers from the Institute for Photovoltaics in Stuttgart, Germany, who found that "contrary to previous assumptions, pollutants such as lead or carcinogenic cadmium can be almost completely washed out of the fragments of solar modules over a period of several months, for example by rainwater."

Nuclear to Replace Wind and Solar.  Wind and solar are not remotely competitive with coal or natural gas for generating electricity.  The promoters of wind and solar lie about this constantly, claiming that they are close to competitive.  The lies have two major components.  They ignore or misrepresent the massive subsidies that wind and solar get, amounting to 75% of the cost.  Then they compare the subsidized cost of wind or solar with the total cost of gas or coal.  But wind or solar can't replace existing fossil fuel infrastructure because they are erratic sources of electricity.  The existing infrastructure has to be retained when you add wind or solar, because sometimes the wind doesn't blow or the sun doesn't shine.

Burying The Truth:  No Sensible Environmentalist Supports Filthy Wind & Solar.  Even after 30 years and endless subsidies, no country is powering itself exclusively with the wind and solar; no country ever will.  But that doesn't stop our political betters berating us, should we ever beg the question about the purported logic of throwing endless $trillions at something that's already proven to be an abject failure.  Whatever your views on climate change (the apparently existential threat formerly known as 'global warming'), the idea that trying to run modern, civil societies on sunshine and breezes might somehow prevent it is, of course, a complete nonsense.  One environmentalist who called it out, loud and early, was Michael Shellenberger.  As a long-time advocate for reliable, affordable and safe nuclear energy, and critic of intermittent renewables — calling wind and solar worse than useless — Michael combines common sense, logic and reason, in an era when those attributes have become scarce commodities.

Why Subsidised Wind & Solar Are Sending South Africa's Power Prices Into Orbit.  Rocketing power prices and grid instability are two inescapable consequences of subsidised wind and solar.  While sunshine and breezes might be free, attempting to run your power system using nature's gifts, brings with it a raft of other costs which RE zealots tend to gloss over.  The electricity generation and distribution system — which wind and solar power are meant to completely replace — is one that was designed to work all on its lonesome; no mythical mega-batteries; no load shedding when the wind drops or the sun sets; no prayers to the wind gods; no fuss; and no failures that can't be fixed in an engineering jiffy.  The same can't be said of the unreliables, which always and everywhere depend upon the system as it was — one built on ever-reliable coal, gas, nuclear and hydro (where it's available).  But STT is referring to a system that works, always has and always will.  On the other hand, those seeking to profit from the wind and solar scam claim keep talking about a new 'system'; when, in reality, all they've got to offer is chaos.  And chaos costs.

Trump Recovers Taxpayer Cash On A $1 Billion Obama-Backed Solar Plant.  The Department of Energy reached a settlement Thursday to recover $200 million in taxpayer funds from a loan the Obama administration distributed in 2011 to finance a $1 billion solar power plant that was deemed obsolete before it could officially go online.  The settlement between DOE and Tonopah Solar Energy must now be approved by a bankruptcy court, the Las Vegas Review Journal reported.  The DOE provided a $737 million loan to Tonopah in September 2011 for the purposes of financing the $1.1 billion Crescent Dunes Solar Energy Project in Nevada.  The agency disbursed funds for the plant in 2011 and 2013 before the project experienced problems requiring improvements, rendering the Crescent Dunes obsolete by 2015, Bloomberg reported in January.

Why the World's Most Advanced Solar Plants Are Failing.  The government's leading laboratory for renewable energy has released a new report detailing the strengths and flaws of concentrated solar energy.  The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) published the report with the stated goal of using very mixed feedback on existing concentrated solar projects to create a list of suggested best practices going forward.  The NREL report "is titled CSP Best Practices, but it can be more appropriately viewed as a mix of problematic issues that have been identified, along with potential solutions or approaches to address those issues," it begins.  What's inside includes problems shared across concentrating solar power (CSP) projects as well as general issues of large-scale construction.  There are also issues with specific kinds of CSP plants based on their designs.

Solar Capacity Low Where the Sun Doesn't Shine?  Who Could've Known?  The idiocy quotient of government rises again as solar capacity falls to abysmal levels in Minnesota where the sun doesn't shine all that much in winter.  Data show that solar panels do not work well during Minnesota winters.  Solar panels generated nearly 30 percent of their potential output in July of 2018 in Minnesota, but electricity generation from the state's solar plants dropped to 5.6 percent by December 2018.  Reasons for the performance decline — which only politicians and interest groups could find surprising — include shorter days during winter, performance of solar panels lessened from snowfall because snow reflects light, and the expense to clear snow off of solar panels.

Grand Theft:  US Taxpayers Liable For $120,000,000,000 In Subsidies to Wind & Solar.  In the absence of endless subsidies there would be no wind or solar industries.  Period.  The minute talk turns to cutting those subsidies, the rent-seekers profiting from the wind and solar scam scream 'blue murder'.  In the USA, the greatest economic and environmental fraud of all time is on a scale and magnitude that would make Croesus turn green with envy.  If the wind and solar scam continues unabated, American taxpayers will be forced to fork out more than $120 billion, in the form of direct subsidies, tax credits, and mandates for the generation and transmission of chaotically intermittent wind and solar.

Homeowners out thousands of dollars after second solar installer fails in two years.  Darrin Lundeen thought he did everything right when he went shopping for a company to put solar panels on his house.  He looked at online reviews and settled on five finalists.  He checked the companies out with the Better Business Bureau.  He even decided against hiring the firm with the lowest bid.  But a year after Altaray Solar installed a $28,000 system on his home in New Hope, it still doesn't work.  Even worse, Lundeen has to deal with about $6,000 worth of damage to his basement, which flooded last year when power was unwittingly cut to his sump pump.  The culprit, Lundeen said:  faulty wiring by Altaray.

Surprising Disadvantages of Using Solar Energy.  Solar energy is a renewable resource that has received a lot of attention thanks to the various benefits of using it as a source for electricity generation.  While there are many advantages to using solar power, there are also several downsides that the public should be aware of.

Much-touted Crescent Dunes solar plant goes bust.  Do readers remember the Crescent Dunes solar power plant in Tonopah?  The project commenced some 10 years ago and was financed in part with a $737 million federal loan guarantee.  Nevada Energy fully supported the project, promising to buy power at a rate almost six times as high as the market at the time.  At the same time, the company was destroying Nevada's residential solar businesses by pushing through a measure to reduce the "buyback" of energy generated by households to less than one-sixth of the going rate.  How is the Crescent Dunes doing?  It ceased operations in April.

Barry is a total con man. Remember Solyndra?  [Thread reader]  In 2009 the Obama administration gave $535 million to Solyndra, claiming that it would create 4,000 new jobs.  However, instead of creating those 4,000 new jobs, the company went bankrupt.  It was later revealed that the company's shareholders and executives had made substantial donations to Obama's campaign, that the company had spent a large sum of money on lobbying, and that Solyndra executives had had many meetings with White House officials.  It was also revealed that the Obama administration had already been aware of Solyndra's financial troubles.  For example, according to the company's security filings in 2009, the company had been selling its product for less than the cost of production.  In 2010, Obama visited the Solyndra factory and cited it as a role model for his "stimulus" program, saying "It's here that companies like Solyndra are leading the way toward a brighter and more prosperous future."

Top Executives Plead Guilty to Participating in a Billion Dollar Ponzi Scheme.  The owners of DC Solar, a Benicia-based company, pleaded guilty today to charges related to a billion dollar Ponzi scheme — the biggest criminal fraud scheme in the history of the Eastern District of California.  The government's investigation has resulted in the largest criminal forfeiture in the history of the District with over $120 million in assets forfeited that will go to victims, and has returned $500 million to the United States Treasury, with more to come, U.S. Attorney McGregor W. Scott announced.

Intermittent & Unreliable Wind & Solar The Greatest Subsidy Scam In History.  The so-called wind and solar 'industries' were built on lies, myths and propaganda and run on subsidies.  As wind power 'investor' Warren Buffett put it:  "We get a tax credit if we build a lot of wind farms.  That's the only reason to build them.  They don't make sense without the tax credit."  Buffett might have continued, that it's the only reason anyone invests in them.  As to the lies, myths and propaganda, the spate of bushfires that have swept Queensland, NSW, Victoria and South Australian this summer have energized doomsday climate cultists who — without a shred of scientific evidence — pronounce, with godlike certitude, that those fires were all caused by Australia's failure to rein in its carbon dioxide gas emissions.  Ergo, those fires could have been wholly prevented had we only carpeted every inch of the Australian countryside with windmills and every rooftop with solar panels.  It's a sad indictment of Australia's journalistic tradition that the mainstream press not only repeats this nonsense ad nauseam, but magnifies it by berating any politician with the temerity to stick to the facts.

Pelosi's Brother-In-Law's Company Received $737,000,000 From Obama's Energy Department.  Even as government financed "green energy" pioneer Solyndra was failing, the Obama administration approved an additional $1 Billion in loans to similar green energy projects.  A whopping 737 million of that money went to the Crescent Dunes project situated in Tonopah, Nevada, to finance a 110-megawatt desert solar power plant.  Stay with me.  Nancy Pelosi's brother-in-law' company was a primary beneficiary of that money landing a $737 million loan guarantee from the Department of Energy for Crescent Dunes.  Funny that as Democrats scream that Saudi's renting out an entire floor of a Trump hotel is an untenable emolument.

This $1 Billion Solar Plant Is an Obsolete, Expensive Flop.  Bloomberg reports that a planned $1 billion solar plant was out of date and obsolete before it could even be completed.  The Crescent Dunes plant opened outside of Las Vegas in 2015, when its technology was already behind, and the solar boom since then has completely eclipsed it.  Now, the closed and abandoned plant is the subject of huge ongoing lawsuits.  In a way, Crescent Dunes was like the Elon Musk dream solar farm of its heyday after construction was approved in 2011.  It covers about 300 acres with thousands of solar collectors that power a central molten salt tower.  In 2011, a handful of companies presented plans for the plant and received over $700 million in government loan guarantees.

The feds bet $737 million on a salt tower for solar power.  You'll never guess the result.  An inconvenient truth is that the sun sets each day, but the Obama Administration's green planners had an app for that.  They decided to invest in the Crescent Dunes facility that would use molten salt to store heat from the sun, produce steam, and generate electricity even at night.  The utility NV Energy had already agreed to buy the electricity.  Government support would carry the project to sunny success.  In September 2011, the Energy Department described how the 110-megawatt facility would "be the first of its kind in the United States and the tallest molten salt tower in the world," powering more than 43,000 homes a year.  The precedent was Solar Two, a small pilot plant decommissioned in 1999 that had shown it was technically feasible to use molten salt to store and generate power.  But in a 2006 report the Energy Department said the 10-megawatt facility "was never expected to be a viable commercial-scale plant and, in fact, did not validate economic feasibility."  No worries.  It's only taxpayer money, [...]

Another Expensive Solar Scheme Bites the Dust.  The purveyors of solar energy are working overtime to spin the now official failure of the Crescent Dunes thermal solar plant in central Nevada.  The contracts to purchase the electricity from the constantly broken plant will be voided.  Bloomberg Businessweek claims that Crescent Dunes was obsoleted by technological advances in the form of photovoltaic based solar plants.  That is nonsense and misses the whole point of the Crescent Dunes project.  It also misses the reality that all utility-scale solar is a failure — not marginal, not growing into being practical, but a total and complete failure.  The scalable forms of renewable energy are wind and solar.  Hydro is severely limited by most state laws that define renewable energy — not because hydro is not renewable, but because it is not politically correct.  Dams are not politically acceptable to the kayakers and big thinkers at the Sierra Club.  Nevada is wind poor but sunshine rich.  So for Nevada, solar is the only route to energy nirvana.  Nevada has a law requiring that 50% of the electricity be from renewable sources by 2030.

It's time to hit the off switch for solar, wind power tax breaks.  The solar Investment Tax Credit is scheduled to wind down, which means special interests are pushing for an extension — part of an end-of-the-year grab bag of tax breaks known as a "tax extenders" bill.  A Republican Congress passed, and President George W. Bush signed, the Energy Policy Act of 2005, a wide-ranging effort to increase U.S. energy independence and security at a time of declining oil and natural gas production.  Two key components of the law were the solar Investment Tax Credit (ITC) and the Production Tax Credit (PTC) for wind energy.  Both were reauthorized in 2015, again by a Republican Congress, as part of a deal to allow the United States to begin exporting crude oil.  But as Texas Rep. Kevin Brady, then chairman to the House Ways and Means Committee, points out, it was supposed to be a one-time extension, which is why he doesn't support the effort today.

Widespread electrical blackout in central Australia caused by... clouds.  The danger of reliance on electrical generation power sources that can suddenly surge or diminish the way wind and solar energy do was highlighted by a major blackout that left central Australia and the "major" town of Alice Springs without electricity for up to nine hours.  Yesterday, two top energy officials in the Northern Territory lost their jobs over the fiasco.

The Toxic Pandora's Box of Solar Panels?  A neighbor down the street proudly placed solar panels on his house.  He spent $4,000 after government subsidies and whatever deductions he may have taken from his income tax.  He is confident that this move will save him tons of money on electricity and will safeguard the planet from global warming Armageddon by reducing his carbon footprint from fossil fuels.  There is one fly in this perfect ointment — solar panels generate "tons of toxic waste" during the production process and during their disposal/replacement.  The solar energy advocates, who only see cheap electricity with rose-colored glasses, are oblivious to the reality of cost, toxic chemicals, environmental pollution, and health hazards to humans and animals.

California Turns Off a Lot More Than Just the Lights.  Going solar isn't necessarily any protection from California's new "planned" power outages, and local residents and businesses are enduring a lot more than just a few inconveniences.  Bloomberg's Chris Martin has a story on California's troubles with one of my favorite headlines ever:  "Californians Learning That Solar Panels Don't Work in Blackouts."  Apparently, many of California's would-be Earth-savers had no idea that just putting solar panels on their roofs doesn't mean they'll have power when PG&E switches it off.

Uh oh!  Californians Learn That Solar Panels Stop Working When Power Is Cut.  As part of their efforts to prevent wildfires, California's electric supplier PG&E shut down power to approximately 800,000 residents and businesses in the northern part of the state last week.  The thinking is that dry, windy conditions spark wildfires and if the utility could take large swathes of the power grid offline when those conditions are present, this would prevent fires.  The Mercury News reports that in the last couple of years, several major fires have started from "PG&E power lines in the Wine Country and Sierra foothills."  Many residents did not understand why their solar panels stopped working when the power was cut.  It turns out that only solar panels which are installed with a battery backup will keep the lights on.

Squeaky clean, huh?  Obama forgot about these 25 scandals.  [#21] Solyndra and the lost $535 million:  In 2009, solar panel manufacturer Solyndra received a $535 million loan guaranteed by the Department of Energy.  In 2010, Obama claimed Solyndra was "leading the way toward a brighter and more prosperous future."  Solyndra shut down in August 2011, leaving 1,100 people out of work and taxpayers on the hook for the $535 million.  ABC News reported, "The deal later came under scrutiny from independent government watch dogs and members of Congress, which said the administration had bypassed key taxpayer protections in a rush to approve the funds — claims the administration has denied."

North Carolina Energy Company Finds Solar Power Actually Increases Pollution.  If we expect to create a prosperous future fueled by low-cost, clean energy, it's time to recalibrate the way we think about renewables.  That requires us to move beyond the once cutting-edge view that solar power is a key ingredient in lowering greenhouse gas emissions.  Ironically, a frequent target of environmentalists, Duke Energy, is showing us that's not the case.  In fact, Duke documents show the negative impact of deploying solar power on the electric grid.

2.9 Billion Bird Deaths Linked to Solar, Wind.  Feathers at the foot of a wind turbine.  Bird droppings at the base of a solar panel.  A coroner could use these signs to establish the cause of mass bird death.  And a novelist could pen a murder mystery titled:  Death by Renewable Energy.  In 1969, there were far more active coal plants in America than today.  However, in 1969, there were also 2.9 billion more birds in America.  In the last decade alone, 289 coal plants have closed — a 40 percent reduction.  Meanwhile, wind turbines and solar panels are going up at a record pace and scientists are reporting a "full-blown crisis" in the disappearance of 29 percent of North American birds.

Tesla solar panels [lead to] calls for Elon Musk's resignation.  Tesla solar panels are exploding — but not in popularity.  The brand's solar panels have multiple safety issues, causing over half a dozen fires.  It is no surprise that Tesla buyers, big and small, are shocked and dismayed by the numerous bugs that have been found in these so-called "luxury" products.  Even Tesla short-sellers are disgusted with Tesla's recent controversies, with some even beginning to call for CEO Elon Musk's resignation.

Solar panels:  Thousands of customers complain.  Thousands of people who bought solar panels have complained to a financial watchdog that they are not bringing them the returns they were promised.  Many people took out loans to pay for panels on the promise they would save thousands of pounds in electricity costs and make money generating power.  They say they have not had the expected savings, and the Financial Services Ombudsman has had 2,000 complaints.

Fury over the fading benefits of solar power as thousands complain.  They were promoted as the eco-friendly way to generate both electricity and cash at the same time.  But now thousands of home-owners who bought solar panels have complained that they're not reaping the rewards they were promised.  The Financial Ombudsman Service has received 2,000 complaints and Barclays has put aside millions to compensate those who took on costly loans to pay for mis-sold panels.

Former National Grid director says ministers should impose limits new wind and solar farms to help avoid power cuts.  Ministers should impose limits on the construction of new wind and solar farms to help avoid a nationwide blackout, according to a former director of National Grid.  Colin Gibson, who was power network director of Britain's electricity system, claimed that some existing turbines and solar panels may have to be disconnected, and new developments restricted, to "secure" the system after major power cuts earlier this month.

The Environmental Disaster of Solar Energy.  Solar energy is terrible for the environment in a number of ways, including the fact that large land areas must be devoted to it.  At Forbes, Michael Shellenberger highlights another problem with solar energy: it produces vast quantities of hazardous waste, which are not being adequately dealt with. [...] Disposal of decommissioned solar panels in regular landfills is "not recommended in case modules break and toxic materials leach into the soil."  But where do most decommissioned panels go?  Landfills.

Duke Energy application points finger at solar for increased pollution.  A seven-month investigation and numerous public information requests have revealed the move to increase solar power might be leading to an increase in the very emissions alternative energy sources aim to reduce.  Duke spokeswoman Kim Crawford confirmed that increased solar power on the state's electric grid is increasing emissions of nitrogen oxide (NOx), a dangerous air pollutant.  She said that reductions in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions could also reverse if current solar growth continues without policy changes.

How Elon Musk Fooled Investors, Bilked Taxpayers, and Gambled Tesla to Save Solarcity.  [Scroll down]  In public, Musk doesn't talk much about Tesla's factory in Buffalo — a place he once, in better times, dubbed Gigafactory 2.  Gigafactory 1, of course, is Tesla's much-hyped futuristic electric car plant outside Reno.  Gigafactory 2, which is shrouded in silence and secrets, was a controversial side venture:  a high-stakes move to dominate America's growing market for solar energy.  Tesla bought the factory's main tenant, SolarCity, for almost $5 billion in 2016.  The plan, in true Muskian hyperbole, was to turn the plant in Buffalo into what was billed as the largest manufacturing facility of its kind in the Western Hemisphere.  SolarCity would build 10,000 solar panels per day and install them on homes and businesses across the country.

Walmart sues Tesla over solar panels it says caused multiple fires.  Walmart has sued Tesla, saying solar panels supplied by the electric carmaker were responsible for fires at about seven of its stores.  The fires destroyed significant amounts of store merchandise and required substantial repairs, totaling hundreds of thousands of dollars in out-of-pocket losses, according to a lawsuit filed in a New York court on Tuesday [8/20/2019].  As of November 2018, no fewer than seven Walmart stores, including those in Denton, Maryland, and Beavercreek, Ohio, had experienced fires due to Tesla's solar systems, according to the lawsuit.

Renewable Energy Hits the Wall.  Wind and solar are erratic sources of energy.  The output depends on the weather.  Solar doesn't work at night.  Because they are erratic, there have to be backup plants, generally natural gas plants, that balance the erratic flow of electricity from wind or solar. [...] As long as the percentage of electricity that comes from wind or solar is small, the grid can handle the erratic nature of that electricity.  But if the penetration becomes large, severe problems start to emerge.  Solar power is strongest in the middle of the day and weakens toward the end of the day.  But the late afternoon and early evening, when solar is dying, are when power usage peaks in many locations.

Photos show the world's first solar road that's turned out to be a colossal failure.  France appears to have been on the solar road to nowhere.  In July, the French daily newspaper Le Monde reported that the 0.6-mile solar road was a fiasco.  In December 2016, when the trial road was unveiled, the French Ministry of the Environment called it "unprecedented."  French officials said the road, made of photovoltaic panels, would generate electricity to power streetlights in Tourouvre, a local town.  But less than three years later, a report published by Global Construction Review says France's road dream may be over.  Cracks have appeared, and in 2018, part of the road had to be demolished due to damage from wear and tear.

Solar power is an expensive dead end.  There are plenty of well-meaning idealists supporting the use of solar power.  Unfortunately, they have mostly been fooled.  The people making money from solar are only too eager to exploit them.  Solar power, among other forms of so-called renewable power, is mandated by Senate Bill 358 (SB358) and may be further mandated by a constitutional amendment that will be on the 2020 ballot.  As solar power is the renewable power that works best in sunny Nevada, the prospect is that billions will be spent on solar power here in the next 10 or 15 years.  Solar power is intermittent power, though.  It comes and goes according to the weather and, of course, it does not work at night.

Why solar power is a looming disaster for Nevada.  Solar power cannot reduce the need for fossil fuel plants because peak summer demand takes place just as solar is quitting for the evening.  Solar power is a redundant capital investment with benefits dwarfed by the cost.  Even if batteries are added to support solar power into the evening, fossil fuel plants can't be eliminated because there are many cloudy days, even in the sunniest parts of the southwest.  If much more solar is built, the Nevada electrical grid will be faced with excess solar power during the middle of the day, forcing the solar to be curtailed, wasting money spent on solar.  The solar interests are proposing the use of expensive storage to "solve" this problem.

Carbon-Free Power:  Solar versus Nuclear.  Solar power has received hundreds of billions of dollars in subsidies and research grants in the United States alone, and perhaps as much as a trillion worldwide over the past 30 years.  For that investment, solar contributes roughly 1% of the world's total power.  So which is better, solar or nuclear?  While it is impossible to provide a definitive answer now, there is a gigantic laboratory in Europe that gives a strong indication.  That laboratory is France and Germany.

What It Will Take for the Wind and Solar Industries to Collapse.  The bankruptcy of PG&E, the largest California utility, has created some cracks in the façade.  A bankruptcy judge has ruled that cancelation of up to $40 billion in long-term energy contracts is a possibility.  These contracts are not essential or needed to preserve the supply of electricity because they are mostly for wind or solar electricity supply that varies with the weather and can't be counted on.  As a consequence, there has to exist and does exist the necessary infrastructure to supply the electricity needs without the wind or solar energy.  Probably the judge will be overruled for political reasons, or the state will step in with a bailout.  Utilities have to keep operating, no matter what.  Ditching wind and solar contracts would make California politicians look foolish because they have long touted wind and solar as the future of energy.

Cost Shifting is the Name of the Game Regarding Wind and Solar.  Per Economics 101, no cost ever disappears.  Eventually, the various shifted wind and solar costs, plus direct and indirect wind and solar subsidies, would increase the prices of energy and of other goods and services.  Efficiency and productivity improvements elsewhere in the energy sector, and other sectors of the economy, may partially, or completely, offset such increases.

Planned Solar-Panel Facility Threatens Historic Virginia.  A proposed solar-panel facility near Culpeper, Va., has local residents and landowners dissatisfied, since many say it would disrupt Virginia's historic sites while offering an unreliable energy source.  "For reasons of agricultural productivity and zoning, historical sensitivity and natural beauty, it does not belong in this area," Alex Foshay, the owner of an antebellum mansion in the area told the Culpeper Star-Exponent.  "You are going to be placing permanently based solar panels upon Civil War battlefields."

Disentangling the Renewable Energy Scam.  The solar energy industry is telling its pals in Congress that it is willing the lose most of its subsidies.  The current subsidy for solar is 30% of the construction cost.  To that subsidy, an additional 10% subsidy is available due to special fast depreciation for solar energy plants.  The 30% subsidy is scheduled to ramp down to 10% by 2022 and thereafter remain at 10%.  This is not a consequence of declining costs of solar that makes the industry no longer in need of such a large subsidy.  Solar electricity is a mature industry, and cost declines are moderate.  The real reason the solar people are happy with a lower subsidy is that the 30% investment tax credit (ITC) is not their most important subsidy.  The real subsidy is more complicated and better hidden.

The Energy Solution That Should Make Everyone Happy.  Wind and solar are subsidized approximately 70% by the federal government.  The state quotas are effectively an additional subsidy because the electric utilities have to agree to long-term contracts with wind and solar promoters in order to meet their quotas.  The unsolvable problem with both wind and solar is that these are erratic sources of electricity that come and go according the wind and sun.  As a consequence, the electricity they supply is a supplement that can't be counted on.  When wind or solar electricity is flowing, some fuel is saved in the main fossil fuel plants, usually natural gas-powered plants.  Solar has the additional problem that most electricity is delivered at the wrong time — in the middle of the day, not in the early evening, when it is needed.  For technical reasons, it would be difficult and expensive to get to 50% renewable electricity by 2030 by depending mostly on wind and solar.  The wind and solar people have schemes such as new subsidies for batteries, but nothing is on the horizon that will cure the huge problems of wind and solar.

Solar intermittency: upbeat "annual" carbon reduction estimates miss the "hourly" reality.  There is a maximum speed at which solar capacity can expand.  You know you've passed it when insufficient storage means solar curtailment, or selling the daytime excess means curtailment of other clean energy generators.  As solar grows, so too will this problem.  Vincent Xia, at the Precourt Institute for Energy, Stanford University, reports on a new Stanford study which says emissions predictions are not taking this into account, thus overestimating solar's benefits.  The study calculates that the 2025 predictions of emissions reductions are 50% too high in their California test case.

We Shouldn't Be Surprised Renewables Make Energy Expensive Since That's Always Been The Greens' Goal.  [T]he output of solar panels declines one percent every year, for inherently physical reasons, and they as well as wind turbines are replaced roughly every two decades.  As for circularity, solar panels and wind turbines are rarely recycled because the energy and labor required to do so are much more expensive than just buying raw materials.  As a result, the vast majority of solar panels and wind turbines are either sent to landfills or join the global electronic waste stream where they are dumped on poor communities in developing nations.  And that's just at the level of the solar and wind equipment.  At a societal level, the value of energy from solar and wind declines the more of it we add to the electrical grid.  The underlying reason is physical.  Solar and wind produce too much energy when we don't need it and not enough when we do.

Clean Energy Has Questions to Answer.  Xcel Energy out of Colorado is shutting down two coal-fired generating power plants in favor of the largest solar-plus storage project in the United States.  This $2.5-billion "scheme" allowed only 11 companies to bid on the project out of 400 applicants.  Pueblo County, Colorado originally had reservations over losing tax revenue from the former coal-fired power plants.  Xcel wants zero emission electricity by 2050 without saying publicly how that will happen.  California billionaire coal-fired power plant investor turned environmentalist Tom Steyer assisted Xcel's decision to move toward taxpayer-subsidized renewable energy, which is the backbone of the clean energy economy.  Colorado officials never questioned Mr. Steyer's intentions or asked if solar and wind farms can replace reliable, abundant, affordable, scalable, and flexible coal-fired generating capacity.  Currently, renewables only make energy and electricity more expensive for rate-payers.

The Green New Deal Comes to New York.  [Scroll down]  Bill de Blasio claimed that the city would switch completely to 'renewables' in only 5 years.  That would be a spectacular achievement since neither solar nor wind energy work all that well in New York.  New York ranks 47 out of 50 states in average sunlight hours at only 3.79.  It's windier than it is sunnier, but still only comes in at 28 out of 50 with an average annual windspeed of 0.05 miles per hours [sic].  Turbines need winds of 10 miles an hour to start working and city winds are not only erratic, when they blow, they come from different directions, making conventional wind energy setups all but useless.  The New York Times even noted that the city's turbines were for show, with the builder of the city's first wind turbine building installation admitting that they barely did anything.

The Solar Energy Racket.  If solar energy were not propped up by various government policies and subsidies, no utility would buy it.  Not only does solar not work at night, but it does not work if it is cloudy or if a cloud passes in front of the sun.  Utility-scale solar requires a large solar farm consisting of photovoltaic panels.  For $100 million, one can buy a solar farm capable of generating about 80 megawatts of electric power when the sun is squarely shining on the panels.  Depending on the geographical location and the climate, the average power generated will be about 18 megawatts, more during the day and nothing at night.  More in summer and less in winter.  If the power can be sold for $50 a megawatt-hour, about the cost of wholesale electricity generated by natural gas, the annual revenue earned by the plant would be $7.8 million.  But why would anyone want to pay $50 per megawatt-hour for electricity that does not work at night or when the weather is bad?  Better to buy it from a natural gas plant that one can count on.

8 Times Barack Obama Abused His Power To Appease His Base.  [#7] Obama's failed "green energy" loans:  Obama was so committed to creating a new "green economy" that he earmarked $80 billion for clean energy loans, grants, and tax credits as part of his economic stimulus for green energy companies in a highly politicized process benefiting companies that supported him.  We all know how that turned out.  At least fifty Obama-backed clean energy companies went bankrupt or found themselves in major financial trouble.  The most well-known example is Solyndra, which received more than a half-billion dollar loan despite the fact the Department of Energy (DOE) knew they were on the verge of bankruptcy.  Both Barack Obama and Joe Biden were personally involved in the decision-making process to determine who got loans.

Another socialist boom and bust in solar in Victoria.  Behold, the Victorian Govt are proving yet again that Soviet-style electricity management can crush lives, hopes and wallets.  The free market is never as cruel and destructive as one run on "good intentions" or the desire to win virtue-signaling fashion parades. [...] Making money in Australia increasingly means being a better lobbyist for government masters, not being a better producer of things Australians need or want.

Solar's Dirty Secret.  To be clear, local, sustainable, and renewable energy economies are a good thing, but we are deceiving ourselves if we think solar panels will fix our nation's underlying issue of rampant consumerism.  A study conducted by Environmental Progress in 2017 raises serious questions about the claim that solar power is "renewable." [...] How about the deconstruction of the solar fields in 25-30 years; surely the installation company will take care of that?  Since 2016, seven leading solar investment companies have gone bankrupt, leaving the local tax-payers, communities, and municipalities to pick up the mess.

The Green New Deal Will Hit the Poor With Higher Energy Costs.  The Green New Deal's goal is to move America to zero carbon emissions in 10 years.  "That's a goal you could only imagine possible if you have no idea how energy is produced," James Meigs, former editor of Popular Mechanics magazine, says in my latest video.  "Renewable is so inconsistent," he adds.  "You can't just put in wind turbines and solar panels.  You have to build all this infrastructure to connect them with energy consumers."  Because wind doesn't always blow and the sun doesn't always shine, "renewable" energy requires many more transmission lines, and bigger batteries.  Unfortunately, says Meigs:  "You have to mine materials for batteries.  Those mines are environmentally hazardous.  Disposing of batteries is hazardous."  "Batteries are a lousy way to store energy," adds physicist Mark Mills, senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute.  Also, the ingredients of green energy, like battery packs, are far from green.

Wind Turbines and Solar Panels Suspected of Killing Hundreds of Cows in France.  In recent years, cattle farmers in France's Brittany region have lost hundreds of cows to deaths that veterinarians simply cannot explain.  After running various tests on their land, some now claim that the solar panels and wind turbines in the area are releasing too much electricity into the ground, which is slowly killing their animals. [...] According to local farmer Patrick Le Nechet, his cattle just started losing weight a few years back and many of them ultimately died.  The strange thing was that the animals didn't seem to be suffering from any diseases and the veterinarians couldn't explain the cause of death.  After conducting his own investigation, Le Nechet concluded that the mysterious deaths started occurring around the time that a photovoltaic installation appeared in the area.

Battery Foolishness in Florida.  The largest electric utility in Florida is proposing building the world's largest battery to smooth the output of solar energy installations.  Wind and solar energy are erratic.  Output depends on when the sun is shining or the wind is blowing.  If only electricity could be economically stored, wind and solar would be a lot more practical, or at least, less impracticable.  With storage, when the sun is shining or the wind is blowing, electricity could be stored for use when the wind or solar was temporarily dead in the water.  There are two methods of storing electricity that are not entirely inadequate: pumped storage and lithium batteries. [...] Batteries are great for computers, cellphones and portable drills.  They are even semi-practical for automobiles like Tesla's products.  But batteries are desperately expensive for smoothing out wind or solar energy.

"Clean" Energy? What's That?  Shills for wind- and solar-derived energy refer to such sources as "green" or "clean."  But are they really?  In what sense?  And compared to what?  This video by the Clear Energy Alliance makes the case that wind and solar energy are not notably cleaner than fossil fuels, pollution from which has declined rapidly.  Actually, the video is understated.  It could have been more hard-hitting, I think, with a sharper focus on the (African and Chinese) mining and (Chinese) manufacturing that go into producing wind turbines and solar panels.  [Video clip]

Wind & solar are always ruinously expensive.  South Africa faces energy calamity on two fronts.  First is the disaster of Eskom.  Second, and potentially worse, is the disaster of our REIPPPP (Renewable Energy Independent Power Producers' Procurement Programme) and our lunatic IRP 2018 (Integrated Resource Plan).  The IRP is the mandatory plan laid down by the Department of Energy for our electricity supply until 2030.  What it calls the "least cost" option is in fact the most expensive possible option, a mix of wind, solar and imported gas.  If implemented, it would shut down the South African economy.  A very similar plan was actually implemented in South Australia and shows us what to expect in the real world.  Driven by green ideology, South Australia shut down coal stations, which had been providing cheap, reliable electricity, and built a lot of wind turbines and some solar power.  Australia, unlike us, has an abundance of cheap gas.  The result was soaring electricity prices to final customers and two total state black-outs.  At one point in July 2016, the price of electricity reached $14/kWh.

AOC Wants To Install Solar Panels On LaGuardia Airport As Part of Green Plan — Before She Eliminates All Air Travel.  AOC might want to hop on the internet and do a little research about the amount of sunlight LaGuardia gets in an average year.  It ain't much. [...] There are only 96 days a year that have clear skies.  The rest of the time, the cloud cover is anywhere from 40 [to] 100%.

What Would It Cost America to 'Go Solar'?  Renewable energy is getting cheaper every year, but it is a long way from competing with natural gas, coal, or even nuclear power, if nuclear power weren't drowning in lawsuits and regulatory obstructions.  With both wind and solar energy, the cost not only of the solar panels and wind turbines has to be accounted for, but also of inverters, grid upgrades, and storage assets necessary to balance out the intermittent power.  Taking all variables into account, what might it cost for the entire U.S. to get 100 percent of its energy from solar energy?

Democratic Presidential Candidates Perfect Orwell's Language Manipulation.  Solar and wind now constitute some 3% of energy production in the U.S. To go from 3% to 60% — the percentage not covered by nuclear and hydro — while at the same time meeting rising energy demands, projected to grow by 40% by 2050, would be a colossal undertaking.  It would entail paving the entire state of Arizona in solar panels and constructing a wall of windmills from West Texas to North Dakota.  That construction would entail environmental damage far in excess of anything that continued reliance on fossil fuels might do.  It would also kill off entire industries, for which millions of workers have been trained.

Giant solar has Virginia in uproar.  What happens when — in the name of combating climate change — gigantic, industrial-sized renewable energy projects are thrust upon unsuspecting rural communities whose residents soon find out that these unsightly monstrosities destroy vegetation and wildlife, pollute rivers, streams and groundwater, and lead to higher electricity prices for families and businesses, as well as lower property values for nearby residents?

Largest California County Bans Mega Solar Farms.  If climate change is the dire threat the Left portrays it to be, then the largest county in ultra-left-wing California is definitely not setting the example:  Officials from San Bernardino County just killed the construction of a mega solar farm, the Los Angeles Times reports.

California's 'green energy' central planners get their hands slapped by San Bernardino County.  Deserts are always favorite dumping grounds for leftists in their pricey "green" schemes, as any resident of Palm Springs, Calif. — fighting headaches under the constant whirring humming sound of wind turbines can tell you — but nowhere was the urge greater to dump on the desert bigger than against the large, sparsely populated San Bernardino County, where state planners decided that a million acres in that county, to be devoted to glassy solar panel farms, would be great for California fulfilling its "green" energy goals.  Much to their surprise, the County, by a 4-1 vote, said no.

The Trouble With Solar.  The Democrats' Green New Socialism proposes blanketing the U.S. with solar panels and wind turbines so as to replace all reliable forms of power generation with unreliable, intermittent sources.  Everyone knows that solar panels don't produce electricity at night, but there is another problem:  they don't produce electricity when it snows, either.

The Green New Deal : The Antithesis of Green.  Supporters are particularly vague about how they would find the hundreds of billions — or even trillions — of dollars needed to attempt such a plan.  Nevertheless, there is one unassailable fact about the Green New Deal:  It is not green.  Indeed, the entire notion of an all-renewable-energy system is the antithesis of environmental protection and scenic conservation.  The backers of the Green New Deal — along with their allies at big environmental groups such as the Sierra Club, Greenpeace, and others that tout all-renewable schemes — refuse to acknowledge the simple truth that deploying renewable energy at the scale required to fuel the U.S. economy would require covering state-sized territories with nothing but wind turbines and solar panels.  It would also require stringing tens of thousands of miles of new high-voltage transmission lines.  Promoters of all-renewable schemes inhabit a make-believe world where there's endless amounts of vacant land — territory that's just waiting to be covered with energy infrastructure.  The truth is exactly the opposite.

New York State and Renewables.  Governor Cuomo's energy plan for New York includes investment in wind and solar power.  New York has poor wind potential compared to Midwestern states.  New York solar potential is about 30% less than in sunny Southwestern locations.  As a consequence, green energy in New York will be even more overpriced than it is in favorable locations.  In every state, wind and solar are absolutely and totally useless.  In New York, they are even more useless.  Wind and solar installations are built only because there are huge subsidies covering 70% of the cost.  Neither are wind and solar cost-effective ways of reducing CO2 emissions.

Green New Deal:  A Crazy, Expensive Mess.  Producing 100 percent of electricity from renewable sources is a practical impossibility in the near future.  Scientists doubt it would be achievable by 2050, let alone 2029, the deadline Democrats would set.  Such a massive overhaul in power generation would require the closure and replacement of about 83 percent of U.S. electricity generation, including all coal, natural gas, and nuclear plants.  While nuclear energy does not release carbon dioxide, it is not renewable and would not be allowed under the Green New Deal.  Today, renewable electricity — mainly wind, solar, and hydroelectric — provides only 17 percent of American electricity.

Another report reluctantly admits that 'green' energy is a disastrous flop.  Amid hundreds of graphs, charts and tables in the latest World Energy Outlook (WEO) released last week by the International Energy Agency, there is one fundamental piece of information that you have to work out for yourself: the percentage of total global primary energy demand provided by wind and solar.  The answer is 1.1 percent.  The policy mountains have laboured and brought forth not just a mouse, but — as the report reluctantly acknowledges — an enormously disruptive mouse.  The International Energy Agency (IEA) has in recent years become an increasingly schizophrenic organization.  As both a source of energy information and a shill for the UN's climate-focused sustainable development agenda, it has to talk up the transition to a low-carbon future while simultaneously reporting that it's not happening.  But it will!

California mandates solar panels for homes built in 2020 and later.  California lawmakers on Wednesday officially approved a measure that mandates all homes built in the Golden State in 2020 and beyond be solar-powered.  The new standards were approved earlier this year and voted on unanimously by the California Building Standards Commission, the Orange County Register reported.  Officials heralded the move as a "historical undertaking" that "will be a beacon of light for the rest of the country."

Renewably Useless:  Dynamite Needed.  Having written an entire book about wind and solar power I consider myself an expert.  My conclusion is that wind and solar are totally useless for generating utility scale power fed into the electric grid.  They are totally useless because they have to be subsidized, approximately 70% for utility scale installations, and 90% for residential rooftop solar installations.  In other words their economic value is approximately 10% to 30% of their cost.  The subsidy needed to support wind or solar is paid by taxpayers and utility customers.  The right thing to do is to plow under or dynamite the wind and solar installations.  But, wind and solar are still being built, because it is in the financial interest of important people.  The public and the media are fooled into thinking that wind and solar are useful, due to pervasive propaganda and faulty analysis.

Green Energy is the Perfect Scam.  [Scroll down]  In some parts of the country rooftop solar is fashionable.  Homeowners who install rooftop solar often save money because the reduction in cost of electricity from the utility is greater than he cost of the solar electricity.  These homeowners brag to their friends about how clever they are, and the purveyors of rooftop solar place advertisements claiming that rooftop solar is cheaper than buying electricity from the electric company.  This is part of the scam.  Rooftop solar is profitable because it is heavily subsidized and because the electric utility is forced, by the governmental authorities, to provide a connection to back up the solar without compensating remuneration.  The real cost of rooftop solar electricity, exclusive of subsidies, is around 30-cents per kilowatt hour and the real benefit is around two cents per kilowatt hour from fuel saved in the utility's backup plants.

Is Renewable Energy a Fraud?  Can it be that wind and solar energy is a complete fraud?  In the book "Dumb Energy," Norman Rogers makes a powerful and convincing case.  His main point is that there must be backup generating plants because the delivery of electricity from wind or solar is erratic, depending on the surging or weakening of wind and sunlight.  The backup plants supply kilowatt hours when the flow of green electricity falters. [...] If you have to have a backup plant, why not eliminate the wind or solar and just use the backup plant?

When government plays games with energy subsidies, taxpayers lose.  It is by the forced goodwill of electricity customers in Georgia that federal taxpayers aren't yet paying for another Solyndra — of nuclear proportions.  For those who've forgotten the Solyndra fiasco, let me refresh your memories.  Solyndra was a solar-panel maker in California.  The U.S. Department of Energy gave the company $535 million in loan guarantees as part of the Obama administration's stimulus package.  It was a gamble that didn't pay off.  Solyndra went belly up in 2011, and taxpayers were out the $535 million.

'Green' folly.  Anyone who has ever looked out their windows knows that wind and solar only deliver about half the time each day, on good days.  Therefore it's not enough for wind and solar to produce 300,000 megawatts of electricity for consumption during half a day.  They must produce more than 600,000 megawatts each day so the renewables can store what is not consumed.  The first cost multiplier for renewables is that storage capable of handling more than 300,000 megawatts does not yet exist.  The second cost multiplier is to achieve 100-percent replacement of fossil fuels by increasing wind and solar generation to more than 600,000 MW.  This is to store enough energy for several bad days when the sun doesn't shine and the wind doesn't blow (or blows too hard).

Solar Panel Waste:  Solar Energy Not So Green After All.  Discarded solar panels are ending up in landfills, instead of being recycled, where toxic solar panel waste is leaking into the ground and water.  Solar photovoltaic panels, whose operating life is 20 to 30 years, lose productivity over time.  The International Renewable Energy Agency estimated that there were about 250,000 metric tons of solar panel waste in the world at the end of 2016 and that the figure could reach 78 million metric tons by 2050.  Solar panels contain lead, cadmium, and other toxic chemicals that cannot be removed without breaking apart the entire panel.

There Has Never Been An Energy Transition.  It is widely believed, I think, that we are in the midst of an energy transition from fossil fuels to "green" energy sources.  But, for better or worse — I think it's just fine — that isn't the case.  At Watts Up With That?  David Middleton offers charts that indicate no such transition is in progress.  This one shows worldwide energy consumption in million tons oil equivalent.  As you can see, the contributions of "green" energy sources (wind and solar) continue to be trivial.  [Chart]  I would add that this chart actually overstates the contributions of wind and solar.  Those sources are used almost entirely because of government subsidies and mandates.  In many cases, they are more trouble than they are worth to operators of the grid, who in the end have to rely on reliable energy sources in any event.

Solar Power Too Cheap to Meter?  Another Green Dream.  Buy $1 million worth of solar panels and, over a 30-year operating period, they will produce about 25 million kilowatt-hours (kWh).  Never mind what one is paid for those kWh, whether directly or indirectly through tax and regulatory jiggering, or legal mandates, that's the quantity of energy one gets.  Period.  By comparison, $1 million worth of a modern wind turbine will produce 50 million kWh over the same 30 years.  That basic fact explains why wind today contributes about 600% more to the grid than does solar; wind power is a lot cheaper.  Alternatively, purchase $1 million worth of a shale rig and, over those same 30 years, that capital will produce enough natural gas to generate 400 million kWh.  The 400 is not a typo.  That same $1 million of hardware producing natural gas yields 10 and 20-fold more 'product' (kWh) than either wind or solar respectively.

10 Ways Big Government Harms You.  [#10] Big government rewards failure and punishes success.  When the Obama administration came into power, one of its stated goals was to promote green energy.  To that end, it began a program of subsidizing various green energy businesses with taxpayer dollars.  One of those companies was Solyndra, a company whose business model revolved around the production of specialized solar power panels.  The Solyndra venture collapsed costing taxpayers nearly $500 million in lost tax money.  As Solyndra headed in to bankruptcy, the federal government then sought to reward its investors by giving them tax breaks to use when Solyndra emerged from bankruptcy.  The government was first investing in failure and then rewarding that failure.

Power Worth Less Than Zero Spreads as Green Energy Floods the Grid.  Wind and solar farms are glutting networks more frequently, prompting a market signal for coal plants to shut off.

The Ridiculous Myth Of Powering The Nation With Renewable Energy.  Technocrats should back up a few steps and look at the foolishness of their plans:  To power America with 100% renewable enerty they propose 500,000 wind turbines, 18 billion square feet of solar panels, 75 million residential rooftop systems, 50,000 wind and solar farms.  The projected cost is a minimum of $15.2 Trillion.  However, we are already fully powered with enough oil, natural gas and coal resources to last another 200 years.

The $2.5 trillion reason we can't rely on batteries to clean up the grid.  Fluctuating solar and wind power require lots of energy storage, and lithium-ion batteries seem like the obvious choice — but they are far too expensive to play a major role.

Wind and Solar Energy:  Good for Nothing.  [Scroll down]  Some real-world examples will further illustrate the point.  Texas has a huge wind generation system with a capacity of 17,000 megawatts.  On August 31, 2016 at noon, output from the wind system fell below 1% of capacity.  The Texas wind system frequently has swings of thousands of megawatts within a few hours.  It often produces at less than 5% of capacity.  On September 1, 2017, between 4 P.M. and 6 P.M., California experienced a record demand of a bit more than 50,000 megawatts.  By 6 P.M., two thirds of solar generation was lost.  By 8 P.M., all solar generation was lost, but demand was still 46,000 megawatts.  On August 2, 2017, the normally reliable California summer sunshine was interrupted by tropical monsoon weather in Southern California.  Solar generation declined by half, and fossil fuel generation had to be mobilized to replace the lost solar.

Retail Electricity Prices for sample countries.  Clip and save.

Is the Solar Panel Dictate a Scam?  As we were enjoying our trip to the former Communist country — Russia — the news broke that the communist country I live in had issued a new rule that all new homes built in California starting in 2020 had to be powered by solar panels as part of the initial construction.  It was stated by the California Energy Commission (CEC) that the homeowners would experience an actual savings over the life of the panels.  After reading multiple reports from the lame press that just regurgitated the cheery analysis from the commission, I decided to investigate the matter upon my return home.

All-renewable energy is a prescription for disaster.  Last year, an all-star group of scientists thoroughly debunked the work of Mark Jacobson, the Stanford engineering professor who, for years, has been claiming the US can run solely on renewables.  In 2016, Sanders adopted Jacobson's entire renewable scheme and made it his energy platform.  In a paper last June in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the scientists — including Ken Caldeira of the Carnegie Institution, Dan Kammen of the University of California, Berkeley, former EPA Science Advisory Board chairman Granger Morgan and Jane Long of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory — concluded that Jacobson's all-renewable scheme used "invalid modeling tools, contained modeling errors, and made implausible and inadequately supported assumptions."  Those errors "render it unreliable as a guide about the likely cost, technical reliability, or feasibility of a 100-percent wind, solar and hydroelectric power system."

Wind and Solar Require Massive Subsidies.  It is difficult to fully itemize the subsidies provided for wind and solar energy.  Many subsidies are hidden in the tax code or are an indirect consequence of the privileged treatment given these sources of electricity.  A fundamental difference between wind and solar and traditional energy sources is that wind and solar are intermittent and erratic.  The weather affects both wind and cloud cover.  The sun sets every night, turning off solar generation, often just when demand peaks.  In winter, solar generation drops — dramatically in areas with heavy winter cloud cover.  Wind and solar are dumb electricity.

Tesla to close a dozen solar facilities in nine states: documents.  Electric car maker Tesla Inc's move last week to cut 9 percent of its workforce will sharply downsize the residential solar business it bought two years ago in a controversial $2.6 billion deal, according to three internal company documents and seven current and former Tesla solar employees.

Dumb Energy.  The core characteristic of wind and solar is that they are erratic sources of electricity.  The supply is randomly intermittent. [...] The wind and solar promoters, in order to accommodate their dumb energy, demand that the electric grid be re-engineered to become a "smart" grid.  Perhaps the idea is that if the grid is smart enough, the dumb energy will be canceled by the smart grid.  That's actually what the smart grid people have in mind.  The smart grid is supposed to be agile enough to fill in the gaps when the wind or solar is playing hooky.

Epic Renewables Fail as Solar Crashes and Wind Refuses to Blow.  Don't laugh too hard but this has been a terrible week for the renewable energy dream.  Across the world solar energy share prices have crashed. [...] Solar stocks have fallen across the board by double digits.  It's uncertain when they will recover.  It hasn't been a good week for wind energy either.  In Britain, the industry has become a national joke because for seven days its wind turbines stood still and produced no electricity.

Celebrity chef Adam Harvey arrested for poisoning seven-story maple tree blocking his solar panels.  A celebrity chef with a warped sense of going green poisoned a neighbor's giant silver maple tree because it blocked sunlight from the solar panels on his Windsor Terrace home, the Brooklyn District Attorney's Office says.  Adam Harvey, 33, was arrested in May after neighbors spotted him drilling 11 holes into the trunk of the seven-story tree and filling it with herbicide, prosecutors say.  The former "Top Chef" contestant, who owns the Gowanus restaurant Bar Salumi, was arraigned on May 15 with two misdemeanors charges: criminal mischief and criminal trespass.  A judge also issued an order of protection against the foliage fiend, barring him from going near the tree's owner.

Three Climate Change Questions Answered.  A claimed nearly unanimous scientific consensus on fear of climate change has caused a push to substantially reduce or even eliminate the use of fossil fuel in favor of solar and wind.  But three crucial questions are:  1) is the scientific community really united?,  2) can solar and wind take over any time soon to provide the required vital energy for the maintenance of modern civilization in today's world of 7 billion people?,  and 3) has CO2 caused any harm yet?  The answer to all three questions is no.

"Green" Energy, an Environmental Disaster.  One of the worst features of both wind and solar energy is that they are terrible for the environment.  Land-based wind turbines are bad enough, but offshore installations are a fiasco waiting to happen.

Tom Steyer Allegedly Using Convicted Felons For His Renewable Energy Initiative.  An organization backed by environmentalist Tom Steyer is allegedly paying convicted felons to gather signatures for a ballot initiative in Arizona — a crime in the state.  Steyer, an environmentalist billionaire who has spearheaded numerous climate change initiatives across the country, is behind a push to increase Arizona's renewable energy portfolio.  The California activist, through his national NextGen America organization, has completely funded Clean Energy for a Healthy Arizona — a group that is campaigning to force utilities to obtain 50 percent of their electricity from renewable sources, such as solar and wind, by 2030.  Such a sweeping mandate requires an amendment to the Arizona Constitution, meaning supporters have to collect 225,963 valid voters' signatures by July to make the 2018 ballot.

If Solar And Wind Are So Cheap, Why Are They Making Electricity So Expensive?  Over the last year, the media have published story after story after story about the declining price of solar panels and wind turbines.  People who read these stories are understandably left with the impression that the more solar and wind energy we produce, the lower electricity prices will become.  And yet that's not what's happening.  In fact, it's the opposite.

German Solar Industry Crashes And Burns.  The reality is that Germany's green revolution is far from being a model for the world.

Solar Advocates Openly Celebrate Crony Capitalism.  The California Energy Commission just voted unanimously to require new homes to be constructed with solar panels.  Amazingly, the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), a trade organization, openly bragged about manipulating the government to force new homes to be equipped with solar panels. [...] Crony capitalism is an unfortunate feature of life, but the shamelessness with which the solar industry acts is truly a sight to behold.

California's Self-Inflicted Housing Disaster Couldn't Get Worse — Or Could It?  California is a virtual one-party state, and suffers for it.  A case in point:  At the final forum for gubernatorial candidates before the June 5 state primary, lavish promises were made by Democratic candidates to build "millions" of new homes to end the state's housing crisis.  But the fact is, California's far-left politicians created the problem, and don't have a clue about how to solve it.  As the headlines above show, the same politicians that vow to build "millions" of new homes to keep state citizens from leaving will now require solar panels on new houses.  They claim that'll add just $9,500 per house, but of course that's way low.  Making homes less affordable is no way to end a housing shortage.

California Bureaucrats Will Soon Require Solar Panels on New Homes:  But Is It Safe?  The California Energy Commission, a group of unelected bureaucrats, is poised to approve new changes to the state building code.  Among these changes is a requirement that all new housing be equipped with rooftop solar panels in an attempt to cut down on fossil-fuel usage and greenhouse gases, which many scientists believe contribute to climate change.  Expected to be approved today [5/10/2018], the change to the building code would take effect in 2020.  Current estimates are that the required solar panels will add an additional cost of $8,000-$12,000 per house.  California would be the first state to make such a requirement, although it is also being discussed in New Jersey, Massachusetts, and Washington, D.C.

Michigan Initiative Would Restrict Energy Choice.  A citizens' ballot campaign in Michigan aims to force the state to get 30 percent of its electricity from select renewable energy sources such as solar and wind power by 2030.  Clean Energy, Healthy Michigan (CEHM) introduced its "30 by 30" plan in mid-February.  CEHM must collect at least 252,523 valid signatures by August 12 to get on the November ballot.  The ballot initiative is backed by California-based financier and leftist activist Tom Steyer, who has made millions of dollars on coal investments since 1999.  A similar constitutional amendment backed by anti-fossil fuel activists that would have raised Michigan's renewable power mandate to 25 percent by 2025 was rejected in a 62 percent to 38 percent vote in 2012.

California becomes first state to mandate solar panels on new homes.  California has become the first state in the nation to mandate solar panels for all new homes, in a move to cut greenhouse gas emissions that critics say will end up raising home prices in the already expensive market.  In a unanimous 5-0 vote Wednesday [5/9/2018], the California Energy Commission approved the policy.  The regulation will require all homes and apartments built after 2020 to have solar panels, adding an average of roughly $10,000 to construction costs for a single-family home.

California, Land Of The Mandatory Solar Panels.  Thinking of building or purchasing a newly constructed home in California?  Even assuming you can somehow afford to own one in one of the most brutal real estate markets in the country, get ready for the cost to go up further.  The state government is preparing to pass a new law which will mandate that every new house, condo or other building up to three stories high must have solar panels installed and comply with a "net-zero energy" profile.  (This means that they have to produce enough of their own solar power to offset all electricity off the grid and natural gas consumed over the course of a year.)  Even more remarkably, they want everyone to be in compliance in under two years.  What this will do to the California real estate market, particularly for aspiring, low-income homeowners remains a mystery.

California to require solar panels on most new homes.  There's no question that solar power is entering the mainstream, but California is about to give it a giant boost.  The state's Energy Commission is expected to approve new energy standards that would require solar panels on the roofs of nearly all new homes, condos and apartment buildings from 2020 onward.  There will be exemptions for homes that either can't fit solar panels or would be blocked by taller buildings or trees, but you'll otherwise have to go green if your property is brand new.

The tower of power falls short -produces only 30% of capacity.  If we look at the operational Concentrated Solar Power stations of capacity above even only 50 MW in the entire world, this list includes 34 stations, 31 of them are parabolic trough, a much more consolidated and reliable concentrated solar power technology, 1 is Fresnel reflector, and only 2 of them are solar tower.  The 2 power stations are both in the United States, the 377 MW Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System and the 110 MW Crescent Dunes Solar Energy Project.  As actual electricity production of these plants is available from the United States Energy Information Administration, we may certainly check if the numbers by NREL are right.  As a comparison, we also consider the data of a more reliable concentrated solar power parabolic trough plant similarly recently built, the 250 MW Genesis, that has no thermal energy storage.  For the 377 MW Ivanpah, the planned electricity production was 1,079,232 MWh per year, corresponding to a capacity factor of 32.68%, with minimal support by burning natural gas.

Here are 1,366 well sourced examples of Barack Obama's lies, lawbreaking, corruption, cronyism, hypocrisy, waste, etc..  [#25] In 2009 the Obama administration gave $535 million to Solyndra, claiming that it would create 4,000 new jobs.  However, instead of creating those 4,000 new jobs, the company went bankrupt.  It was later revealed that the company's shareholders and executives had made substantial donations to Obama's campaign, that the company had spent a large sum of money on lobbying, and that Solyndra executives had had many meetings with White House officials.  It was also revealed that the Obama administration had already been aware of Solyndra's financial troubles.  For example, according to the company's security filings in 2009, the company had been selling its product for less than the cost of production.  In 2010, Obama visited the Solyndra factory and cited it as a role model for his "stimulus" program, saying "It's here that companies like Solyndra are leading the way toward a brighter and more prosperous future."

Green solar farm is turning an Essex County watershed brown.  Gary McCauley of Essex County knows construction and he knows the Muddy Gut Creek watershed where he's spent most of his 63 years.  Never for a minute did he believe anyone, or any company would be allowed to build in such a way that an untold number of tons of muddy sediment would blast through the ditches, the sleepy creek and into the Rappahannock River, all part of the Chesapeake Bay watershed.

Court Sees if Church Solar Panels Break Electricity Monopoly.  North Carolina's highest court is taking up a case that could force new competition on the state's electricity monopolies.  The state Supreme Court on Tuesday [4/17/2018] will consider the Utilities Commission's decision to fine clean-energy advocacy group NC WARN for putting solar panels on a Greensboro church's rooftop and then charging it below-market rates for power.  The commission told NC WARN that it was producing electricity illegally and fined the group $60,000.  The group said it was acting privately and appealed to the high court.  If the group prevails, it could put new pressure on Duke Energy's monopoly.

Solar panels could be a source of GenX and other perflourinated contaminants.  A scientist at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency confirmed Friday [2/16/2018] that certain perfluorinated compounds are used in the production of solar panels.  In response to a request from the North State Journal, EPA physical scientist Dr. Mark J. Strynar provided 39 records from the SciFinder database used by the EPA to identify applications of PFAS (perfluorinated alkylated substances) with solar panels.

Solar energy bill killed in legislative surprise.  The South Carolina House has taken a surprise step and killed a solar energy bill that passed a key vote last week.  The bill removing a cap on the amount of solar energy in the state failed to pass Tuesday after opponents had it ruled a property tax increase.

Solar farms receive more cash from green subsidies than selling the energy they produce.  Britain's biggest solar farms receive more cash from green subsidies than from selling the electricity they produce, figures reveal.  Energy producers were encouraged to start solar farms with generous handouts funded by a 'green levy' on taxpayers' bills.  But many of them now make the majority of their cash from the subsidy — instead of the electricity they produce.

Relying on renewables alone significantly inflates the cost of overhauling energy.  It increasingly appears that insisting on 100 percent renewable sources — and disdaining others that don't produce greenhouse gases, such as nuclear power and fossil-fuel plants with carbon-capture technology — is wastefully expensive and needlessly difficult.  In the latest piece of evidence, a study published in Energy & Environmental Science determined that solar and wind energy alone could reliably meet about 80 percent of recent US annual electricity demand, but massive investments in energy storage and transmission would be needed to avoid major blackouts.  Pushing to meet 100 percent of demand with these resources would require building a huge number of additional wind and solar farms — or expanding electricity storage to an extent that would be prohibitively expensive at current prices.  Or some of both.

Why Solar and Wind Are Not the Future.  Wind farms were a familiar sight for me as they were an integral part of the landscape near my hometown in southern India.  The general assumption was that these windmills would generate a significant amount of electricity to aid the energy sector that was struggling to meet soaring electricity demand.  However, the wind farms turned out to be a burden, not a boon.  They generated unreliable and expensive electricity that was available only during the windy months of the year.  This is true with wind farms worldwide, which are infamous for killing hundreds of thousands of birds every year.  Much like wind, solar, too, has many limitations.  It harnesses light energy only during the day, subject to weather conditions and cloud cover.  Solar and wind both need battery backup, and despite the falling costs of installation, the technology is far from competing with conventional energy sources.  Today, solar and wind together constitute only 0.8 percent of global energy.  That is an insignificant percentage, given the energy demands of the industrialized world.

Remember when Obama picked the 'winners' and 'losers'?  Obama continually rewarded unsustainable solar and wind companies to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars in subsidies.  A certain small class of hucksters running unsustainable companies such as Solyndra made out like bandits and taxpayers were left on the hook for $500 million.  When the bills were sorted out after the company went bust, the Obama hucksters got paid first, despite mismanaging the company, and taxpayers were left holding the bag.

Farmington council votes against proceeding with solar project.  The Farmington City Council unanimously has voted against moving forward with installing a solar array near the Bluffview Power Plant.  "I really want to go on the record and say I'm not against solar," Councilor Linda Rodgers said during a meeting Tuesday evening [2/27/2018].  "The thing I can't wrap my head around is that it really does not make economic sense."  The councilors said they believe solar will have a place in Farmington's power generation assets, but they do not think the utility should pay twice the amount for solar power that it pays to purchase other power from the market.

How Environmentalists Keep Heating Bills High.  Home heating and electric bills would be much cheaper still for poor families without the so-called renewable-energy standards pushed by greens and liberal politicians at the state and local levels.  The Manhattan Institute has found that states with these wind and solar mandates have had much larger hikes in utility costs than states without them.  New York, which is revving up its green energy policies, charges its residents 40% more for electric power than the national average.

Inconvenient energy fact of the day.  In 2016, solar and wind provided just 0.8% of the total world's energy (Total Primary Energy Demand (TPED)), even after trillions of dollars in taxpayer-extracted subsidies, and will reach only a 3.6% share of energy in 2040, according to the International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2017 forecast.  The world's energy future of tomorrow, even almost a quarter century from now in 2040, will look very much like it does today, with fossil fuels supplying the large majority of our energy (81% today vs. 75% in 2040) and renewables playing a relatively minor role as energy sources.

Nations with more renewables have more expensive electricity.  [Scroll down]  Evidently, something else has changed.  Something seismic that wiped out all the bids below $50/MWh.  Perhaps it has something to do with the 2,106 turbines in 79 wind farms that on random windy days might make 4,325MW that didn't exist in Australia in 1999 when electricity was cheap and our total national wind power was 2.3 megawatts?  Another clue might be the 1.8 million new solar PV installations, which theoretically generate 7 gigawatts of electricity at noon on cloudless days if all the panels have been cleaned.  Back in 2007, we had 14MW.  But of course, cause and effect are devilishly difficult.  The one thing we know for sure is that even though sunlight and moving air is free, there is no country on Earth with lots of solar and wind power and cheap electricity.

Grid-Scale Storage of Renewable Energy:  The Impossible Dream.  The utopian ambition for variable renewable energy is to convert it into uniform firm capacity using energy storage.  Here we present an analysis of actual UK wind and solar generation for the whole of 2016 at 30 minute resolution and calculate the grid-scale storage requirement.  In order to deliver 4.6 GW uniform and firm RE supply throughout the year, from 26 GW of installed capacity, requires 1.8 TWh of storage.  We show that this is both thermodynamically and economically implausible to implement with current technology.

How Much Should Taxpayers Invest in Elon Musk?  Few people realize that [Elon] Musk played an important part in the creation of PayPal.  More familiar is Musk's role as the CEO of Tesla, an innovative and increasingly successful auto manufacturer that produces stylish electric cars.  He also helped found SolarCity, one of the leading companies in the United States that manufactures solar panels. [...] Like all celebrated inventors/entrepreneurs, however, Musk has had his share of failures and detractors, and more importantly his successes have always come at a price.  Increasingly, that price is borne by taxpayers, in the form of costly subsidies, tax breaks, and government contracts.  According to the Los Angeles Times, Musk's companies have received, or will receive, government subsidies and tax breaks totaling $4.9 billion!  It is thus reasonable to ask:  is Elon Musk worthy of such a giant investment of taxpayer dollars?

Green Power is Part Time Power.  24/7 electricity users such as hospitals, trains, factories, refineries, fuel and water pumps, cash registers, infrastructure and mines cannot operate on part-time electricity.  Moreover, every part-time power producer (using sun, wind, batteries, hydro, gas or coal) consumes money full-time for operations, standby, maintenance and replacement.  Each also has to fund its own specialised generators, transmission lines, access roads and workforce.  Electricity becomes both unreliable and expensive, and consumers suffer.  Using taxes, subsidies, dictates and mandates to replace a full-time power producer like coal with up to five part-time power producers only makes sense in the part-time minds that inhabit Greentopia.

Misleading Costs for Wind and Solar.  Recently the media has reported that wind and solar were competitive with coal and natural gas for generating electricity.  The Wall Street Journal, for example, published an article with a headline, Economic impact of wind farms is changing the political dynamics of renewable energy.  These media reports could lead people to believe that wind and solar were competitive with coal-fired and natural gas power plants, which is not the case.  Electricity generated by coal-fired power and natural gas combined cycle power plants remain the lowest cost methods for generating electricity, especially when the unreliability of wind and solar are taken into consideration.

Three N.C. counties call for end to solar tax incentives after rapid spread of sun-soaking energy panels.  At least three eastern North Carolina counties want to end local property tax breaks for solar farms that could stunt the industry's rapid expansion in the region.  Last month, Currituck County passed a resolution — and was joined by Pasquotank and Chowan counties last week — calling on state lawmakers to end the 80 percent tax discount on solar projects.  Rows of sun-soaking silicon panels sit on 2,200 Currituck County acres valued at $210 million, according to the county's resolution.  The solar discount means Currituck receives $210,600 in property taxes instead of more than $1 million.  Pasquotank County is losing more than $420,000 in annual revenue from 508 acres of solar farms, its resolution said.

Puerto Rico Might Ditch Oil to Build New Electric Grid Using Renewable Energies.  With the majority of Puerto Rico's 3.4 million citizens still without power following Hurricane Maria, the commonwealth's government is floating the idea of starting from scratch as it rebuilds — ditching oil dependency and moving toward renewable energies.

The Editor says...
Brilliant idea, because everybody knows windmills and solar panels are impervious to tropical weather.

'I Say:  We Let the Planet Die'.  [Scroll down]  Besides billionaire Al Gore and his carbon credits scam, there are many others who've profited greatly from the green crisis.  Think those turbine windmills are a good thing?  Ask those whose land has been razed to erect these essentially useless bird-killing pinwheels that cost one million dollars each; doesn't matter if they will ever produce enough energy because the government will pay the cost for operating them.  Oops, I mean the taxpayers... Solar panels in cold climates?  Who cares?  One can get tax credits.  Remember Solyndra solar went belly up but somehow only the taxpayers lost money.

Solar Panel Fraud.  Taxpayer-supplied subsidies aren't the only hidden cost faced by those seeking to capture energy from sunlight.  There's no sun shining during nighttime or when clouds and storms arrive leading to little or no gathering of energy.  Partisans for solar power generation have even admitted that constantly redirecting the angle that solar collectors should be stationed is needed if peak efficiency is to be gained, a costly procedure needing constant maintenance.  And the solar power promoters don't like to be reminded that clearing away the snow after a winter storm might be necessary.  Then there are costs associated with storage and transfer of energy acquired during peak hours of sunshine.  And don't forget that manufacturing and installing solar panels plus connecting them electrically and cleaning them regularly isn't inexpensive.  The nation is being inundated with telephone salesmen seeking commitments to acquire solar power capability for single homes.  It's marvelously inexpensive they tell you while not mentioning the huge subsidies being the reason — which means you and your neighbors are really paying for it via taxation.

Hidden consequences of intermittent electricity production.  The high variability of both sun and wind leads to periods of massive overproduction as well as renewable power shortages.  To compensate this, ideally, both storage and backup power should be able to deliver at any moment nearly the full load of the grid.  However, storage at the scale required for a hypothesized 100% renewable system is not feasible with current technologies.  Battery storage is totally insufficient and will need a substantial technological breakthrough. [...] If the outcome of these studies is that the required huge storage systems are unfeasible and that at the same time fossil and nuclear options are rejected, the only solution is to adapt the activity of the society to the availability of electricity and to restrict power availability to part of the population/activities during periods of darkness or absence of wind.  If badly planned, we risk entering a new era where daily life could depend again on the variability of the weather, as it was centuries ago.

7 things you didn't know about where solar energy is headed.  One of the big drawbacks to solar is its intermittency, since solar panels generate electricity only when the sun is shining.  There are exceptions, such as big solar thermal plants.  But those are utility-scale projects the size of small towns.  Typically, smaller solar cells on a single-family home, for example, cannot generate energy when the sun goes down.  Much of the money being spent on research is aimed at solving those fundamental problems with solar electricity, with companies all over the world pushing new technologies to make solar more reliable and cheaper.

The Solar Energy Fraud.  Solar energy is not always a fraud.  If you live off the electric grid, and you have a reasonable amount of sunshine, solar power, backed up by batteries, can be a good option for getting a modest amount of electricity.  It will not be cheap electricity.  Solar is good for powering equipment in remote locations.  It is excellent for powering spacecraft.  It is good for direct heating of swimming pools.  Passive solar in the form of buildings designed to utilize sunshine for warmth and light can save energy.  But, do not think that it is advisable to put solar electricity panels on your roof.  Do not think that it is a good idea for your local utility to build large solar generating farms.  Political influence has created subsidies and mandates that prop up the solar industry.  The money is extracted from taxpayers and utility customers.  The solar industry positions itself as doing a public service by preventing climate change.  Even if you believe the climate change theories, the solar industry is a negligible force against climate change.

Solar [and] Wind Industries [are] Dying as Subsidies Dry Up.  Slowly, deliciously, like a leech starved of blood, the renewable energy industry is withering away and dying.  It can only survive through government enforced subsidies or bribe-incentives.  Once those dry up, so does its trade. [...] The jobs aren't productive ones, the businesses are an ugly manifestation of crony capitalism, and the investors should have realized that in finance there's no such thing as a one way bet.  And in any case the victims of the renewable energy industry's ongoing collapse will be far outnumbered by the victors.  Renewables are, and always have been, a scam perpetrated by the few against the many.

As Zimbabwe's homes go solar, its businesses lag behind.  Old Mutual Zimbabwe Ltd, the country's biggest insurance and property firm, now plans to install up to 20 megawatts of rooftop solar panels on all its commercial buildings over the next two years to help ease a countrywide power crisis that has begun to drag profits down, company officials said.  As state power utility ZESA Holdings struggles to generate enough electricity to meet demand, power outages have hurt businesses in recent years, according to the Confederation of Zimbabwe Industries.

Wind and Solar Energy Are Dead Ends.  [I]n terms of generational capacity, wind and solar have grown by leaps and bounds in the last three decades (wind by 24.3% per year since 1990, solar by 46.2% per year since 1990).  However, there are two questions worth asking:  (i) are renewable energies making a difference, and (ii) are they sustainable?  To answer the first question:  No, wind and solar energy have not made a dent in global energy consumption, despite their rapid growth.  In fact, after thirty years of beefy government subsidies, wind power still meets just 0.46% of earth's total energy demands, according to data from the International Energy Agency (IEA).  The data include not only electrical energy, but also energy consumed via liquid fuels for transportation, heating, cooking, etc.  Solar generates even less energy.  Even combined, the figures are minuscule:  wind and solar energy together contribute less than 1% of Earth's energy output.

Study:  Solar Panels a Looming Toxic Crisis.  The solar-energy industry has been touted for years as the environmentally safe alternative.  After all, solar panels merely absorb the sun's energy and transfer it to consumers.  No oily pipelines, no obstructions to the nation's waterways.  But it appears all is not well for fans of the industry.  Discarded solar panels, piling up around the world, are detrimental to the environment, according to a new study by Environmental Progress.

Solar Energy's Dirty Little Secret.  A new study by Environmental Progress warns that toxic waste from used solar panels now poses a global environmental threat.  The Berkeley-based group found that solar panels create 300 times more toxic waste per unit of energy than nuclear power plants.  Discarded solar panels, which contain dangerous elements such as lead, chromium, and cadmium, are piling up around the world, and there's been little done to mitigate their potential danger to the environment.

Are we headed for a solar waste crisis?  Last November, Japan's Environment Ministry issued a stark warning:  the amount of solar panel waste Japan produces every year will rise from 10,000 to 800,000 tons by 2040, and the nation has no plan for safely disposing of it.  Neither does California, a world leader in deploying solar panels.  Only Europe requires solar panel makers to collect and dispose of solar waste at the end of their lives.

Large Solar Performance Reduction Due to Dust.  Atmospheric particulate matter (PM) has the potential to diminish solar energy production by direct and indirect radiative forcing as well as by being deposited on solar panel surfaces, thereby reducing solar energy transmittance to photovoltaics. [...] Reductions due to dust and anthropogenic PM are comparable in northern India, whereas over eastern China, anthropogenic PM dominates.  On the basis of current solar generation capacity, PM is responsible for ~1 and ~11 GW of solar power reduction in India and China, respectively, underscoring the large role that PM plays in reducing solar power generation output.

Toxic Waste From Solar Panels: 300 Times That of Nuclear Power.  $71 billion (in 2007 dollars) [was spent] to safely and permanently dispose of the entire inventory of 109,300 metric tons heavy metal (MTHM) of high-level waste and spent nuclear fuel.  That would be $84 billion in 2017 USD.  According to BP's Statistical Review of World Energy June 2017, from 1965-2016, US nuclear generating stations produced 26,386 TWh of electricity (26.4 trillion kWh).  $84 billion divided by 26.4 trillion kWh is $0.0032/kWh... 1/3 of one penny per kWh to dispose of the entire inventory of high-level nuclear waste.  If solar panels and the rest of the toxic waste associated with solar installations could be compacted in such a manner that they could be disposed of in deep boreholes, the cost would be greater than $1.00/kWh (300 × $0.0032 = $0.96 plus the cost of compacting the panels, etc.).  So... Why would anyone in their right mind prefer solar over nuclear power?

Solar Power Stops Working Well When It's Hot Outside.  Don't expect recent heat waves hitting the southwest to make solar panels produce more energy, according to an industry representative.  High temperatures decrease a photovoltaic solar cell's output by between 10 and 25 percent, Stuart Fox, a vice president at the green energy company CivicSolar, told The San Francisco Chronicle Wednesday.  Research indicates that a solar panel's power output drops by 1.1 percent for every 1.8 degree rise in temperature above 107 degrees Fahrenheit, and solar panels can get much hotter than that.  "If you take a glass solar shingle and lay it on the roof, there's no air going behind it, so it might get a lot hotter — it might get to 140 or 160 degrees Fahrenheit," Fox told The Chronicle.

Trump's Interior Secretary Calls Obama-Backed Solar Project A 'Sphere Of Death' For Birds.  Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke said he's not against any one form of energy, but still took the time during a recent speech to highlight how green energy from solar panels and wind turbines comes with an environmental cost.  "You know wind chops up around 650- or 750,000 birds a year," Zinke said at an event hosted by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Tuesday.  "Wind comes at a cost.  If you're a fisherman, offshore wind isn't particularly enamored with because it prevents you from fishing which is an important part of our economy."

The Appalling Delusion of 100 Percent Renewables, Exposed.  he idea that the U.S. economy can be run solely with renewable energy — a claim that leftist politicians, environmentalists, and climate activists have endlessly promoted — has always been a fool's errand.  And on Monday, the National Academy of Sciences published a blockbuster paper by an all-star group of American scientists that says exactly that.  The paper, by Chris Clack, formerly with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the University of Colorado Boulder, and 20 other top scientists, appeared in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.  It decimates the work of Mark Jacobson, the Stanford engineering professor whose wildly exaggerated claims about the economic and technical viability of a 100 percent renewable-energy system has made him a celebrity (he appeared on David Letterman's show in 2013) and the hero of Sierra Clubbers, Bernie Sanders, and Hollywood movie stars, including Leonardo DiCaprio.

Renewable energy cost and reliability claims exposed and debunked.  A new paper published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) from NOAA's Earth System Laboratory, Boulder Colorado exposes and debunks the contrived claims of a recent renewable energy study which falsely alleged that low cost and reliable 100% renewable energy electric grids are possible.  The new paper concludes that the prior study is based upon significant modeling inadequacies, is "poorly executed" and contains "numerous shortcomings" and "errors" making it "unreliable as a guide about the likely cost, technical reliability, or feasibility of a 100% wind, solar and hydroelectric power system."

Buyer beware on solar panel scams.  Americans for Limited Government Foundation just released a report titled, "Shedding Light on Solar Electricity," which examined reported problems with the solar industry across the nation.  The report concluded that, "Consumers have a right to know the facts before they decide to have solar panels installed on their homes.  Too many times, unscrupulous solar industry employees have omitted these facts or, intentionally or unintentionally, misled potential customers."  As the report's author, I was surprised by the scams and problems that customers all across the nation have had to deal with after agreeing to have solar panels installed.  For example, some consumers have been ripped off by contractors who collected deposits on solar panels but never installed them.  A number of solar customers have not received the rebates they were due because they were stolen by the contractor.  Many customers have not seen the savings on their utility bills that they were promised, while others who have signed solar leases have experienced problems with selling or refinancing their homes.  Those who signed a lease for solar panels and then tried to get a reverse mortgage have learned it is not possible.

Shedding Light on Solar Electricity.  In recent years, many people have been victimized by unscrupulous solar companies and employees.  For example, customers have been falsely promised government rebates, savings on their electric bills, improved home values, and that solar panels would not cause problems with selling their home or refinancing it.  The lack of complete and correct information has cost many customers money and caused a lot of frustration.  When homeowners are contemplating having solar panels installed on their homes, they need to consider a nearly-dizzying list of factors: the technology, the costs — both upfront and ongoing — the risks, the incentives, the condition and location of their homes, their neighborhood rules, their energy consumption, their finances, the length of time they plan to keep their home, the zoning laws, the climate, the placement of the system, the quality and stability of the installation company, the necessary permits, the warranties, as well as potential savings and other rewards.

Subsidy-driven solar industry a bubble waiting to burst.  A recent report issued by Americans for Limited Government Foundation chronicled on-going consumer complaints and problems across America due to shady sales and marketing practices that run rampant throughout the highly subsidized solar panel industry.  A Duncanville, Texas, man spent $18,000 on solar panels for his home and was shocked to discover that he only saved $177 on his electricity bill over the course of a full year, not exactly the savings that were promised.

Angry Duncanville man saves $177 on $18,000 solar investment.  Unfortunately, tensions between solar companies and customers have become a thing.  Last year, members of both political parties in Congress complained to federal regulators about deceptive sales tactics in the industry.  Customers become entangled in hurtful leasing contracts.  In response to such powerful criticism, the industry's association has embarked on a major offensive to clean up its act before federal regulators do.

"Fast Moving Clouds": The Latest Excuse for a Government Funded Solar Bankruptcy.  What do you say when the government demands to know what happened to all the public money they lent to your failed solar business?

SolarWorld says it's insolvent; fate of Hillsboro factory unclear.  SolarWorld AG, the German parent of a major solar factory in Hillsboro, said Wednesday that it cannot cover its debts and will file for insolvency.  It's unclear what will happen to the company's Oregon operation, which taxpayers have supported with tax breaks worth tens of millions of dollars.  SolarWorld Americas employs 800 on its 103-acre campus in Washington County, and is a big customer for a number of suppliers in the region.

Europe's Biggest Solar Company Goes Up In Smoke.  Germany's SolarWorld, once Europe's biggest solar power equipment group, said on Wednesday [5/10/2017] it would file for insolvency, overwhelmed by Chinese rivals who had long been a thorn in the side of founder and CEO Frank Asbeck, once known as "the Sun King".  A renewed wave of cheap Chinese exports, caused by reduced ambitions in China to expand solar power generation, was too much to bear for the group, which made its last net profit in 2014.

Overview:
Facing the Realities of Renewable Energy.  Photovoltaic (PV) cells convert light directly into electricity.  Sunlight causes electrons in a semiconductor junction to make a quantum leap from one energy state to a higher one.  Most systems convert about 15 percent of the solar energy into electrical energy, with higher efficiency rates coming at much higher costs.  Given the varying sun angles, clouds, and the darkness of night, PV arrays produce less than 20 percent of their full-sunlight capacity.  PV arrays can be valuable in sunny locales where grid power is not available, such as isolated African villages, and for highway warning signs and remote cell towers.  At present, the cost of electricity from PV is far in excess of the wholesale cost of electricity from conventional sources, and the grid-PV industry cannot survive without massive subsidies.

Congress Asked To Eliminate $270 Million A Year In Solar Subsidies.  Conservative groups wrote a letter to Congress Tuesday asking lawmakers on the appropriations committee to eliminate a solar subsidy program worth $270 million.  Conservatives want Congress to pull funding from the Energy Department's SunShot Initiative, citing recent investigations that found the program provided subsidies for rooftop solar power.  The letter calls SunShot the "ground zero of the solar subsidy machine," arguing that it gives out millions of dollars in subsidies through net metering programs.  Such programs force utilities to buy the electricity from rooftop solar panels at up to six times the market price, effectively forcing non-solar residents to pay more to maintain the grid.

Batteries: Another green scam.  The idea of producing reliable grid power from intermittent green energy backed up by batteries looks possible in green doodle-diagrams, but would be absurdly inefficient and expensive. [...] Both wind and solar are unpredictable, unreliable, intermittent, and weather-dependent energy sources.  They require large collection areas with a cobweb of access roads and transmission lines.  Their output can change suddenly and cannot be managed easily to meet demand fluctuations.  They need flexible backup power able to swing in quickly to maintain stability and supply.  Gas provides the easiest back-up for green energy, but gas exploration is banned in many areas of NSW, SAust and the whole of gas-rich Victoria.  Canny residents of the green states are now investing in diesel generators.

Solar Panels Increased Emissions of a Gas 17,200 Times More Potent Than CO2.  Nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) is a key chemical agent used to manufacture photovoltaic cells for solar panels, suggesting government subsidies and tax credits for solar panels may be a driving factor behind the 1,057 percent in NF3 over the last 25 years.  In comparison, U.S. carbon dioxide emissions only rose by about 5 percent during the same time period.  NF3 emissions have rapidly increased in Asia as well due to its rapidly growing solar panel market, and researchers think that many nations are under-reporting their NF3 emissions by roughly a factor of 4.5.  NF3 emissions are 17,200 times more potent than CO2 as a greenhouse gas over a 100 year time period.

In New York, Wind And Solar Get Double Their Value In Subsidies.  New York state is paying 11 large wind and solar power projects two times more in subsidies than the projects actually generate in electricity. [...] State officials are handing out the equivalent of $24.24 per megawatt-hour over the next 20 years to the 11 projects.  Wind turbines can get an additional $23 per megawatt-hour in federal tax credits.  The electricity generated by these 11 projects, however, will only sell for an average of $16.25 per megawatt-hour, according to the federal Energy Information Administration.

Duke Energy says solar power will cost N.C. customers $1 billion too much.  Federal law requires electric utilities to buy the power generated by qualified renewable-energy projects including solar.  Utilities pay prices equal to the "avoided" costs of not building traditional power plants, such as the natural gas-fired units Duke is building in the Carolinas.  Because those costs change over time, the North Carolina Utilities Commission resets them every two years.  In filings this week, Duke said its actual avoided costs have dropped — largely because of falling fuel prices for natural gas — to $35 per megawatt-hour of energy.  But it's paying solar developers $55 to $85 under long-term contracts based on avoided costs the commission previously set.

The comeback of coal.  America was built on coal.  Fossil fuels, following the demise of windmills and the like as the sources of inefficient production of electricity, provided the spark that ignited American industry and made it the industrial leader of the world, and kept it the leader for more than a century and a half.  "America," said Winston Churchill on the eve of World War II, "is a mighty boiler, and once alight there is no limit on what it can produce."  Coal fired that boiler.  Despite an eight-year assault on coal by fanatics who dream of an America cut down to size, coal is still responsible for almost a third of America's electricity.  Wind and solar power, despite enormous subsidies of more than $100 billion over the last decade, still produce less than 5 percent of America's energy.

Solar Inconvenient Truth:  Ivanpah Plant a Big Fossil Fuel User.  The BrightSource Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating Facility, which uses 320,000 mirrors to create thermal energy, still qualifies under state rules as an alternative energy source, despite using about 1.4 billion cubic feet of natural gas a year, according to a report by the Press Telegram.  The California Air Resources Board's most recent analysis reportedly found that during Ivanpah's second year of operation, carbon emissions from gas, used to focus Ivanpah's mirrors at night, jumped by 48.4 percent, to 68,676 metric tons.  The joint venture between BrightSource Energy, NRG, Google and Bechtel was approved by the Obama administration as its biggest alternative-energy project on public lands.  The project also received $1.6 billion in taxpayer loan guarantees, and $600 million in federal tax credits, to reduce carbon emissions by 400,000 tons of carbon-dioxide emissions per year.

The "Wind and Solar Will Save Us" Delusion.  The "Wind and Solar Will Save Us" story is based on a long list of misunderstandings and apples to oranges comparisons.  Somehow, people seem to believe that our economy of 7.5 billion people can get along with a very short list of energy supplies.  This short list will not include fossil fuels.  Some would exclude nuclear, as well.  Without these energy types, we find ourselves with a short list of types of energy — what BP calls Hydroelectric, Geobiomass (geothermal, wood, wood waste, and other miscellaneous types; also liquid fuels from plants), Wind, and Solar.  Unfortunately, a transition to such a short list of fuels can't really work.

Green Energy is a Charter For Crooks And Liars.  The Scam Must End Now.  When is the rest of the Western world going to catch up with Donald Trump and point out that the green emperor is wearing no clothes?  I ask as a concerned UK taxpayer absolutely sick to death of the vast sums of money that continue to be funnelled into the pockets of crooks, liars, spivs, chancers, con-artists and fantasists in the name of solving the non-existent problem of "climate change."

Currituck temporarily bans solar farms while working on problems posed by existing projects.  Currituck County officials have imposed a two-month moratorium on building solar farms over concerns raised about the largest array in the eastern United States already under way here.  Residents have complained to county commissioners about a 2,000-acre site under construction in Moyock that will be filled with the mirrored-glass panels.  Fears have arisen over safety if a hurricane or tornado began blowing broken glass from the panels around.

Obama Has Little To Show For His Lavish Spending On Roads, Green Energy And E-Cars.  Obama came into office like a starry-eyed dreamer.  He promised a vast network of high-speed rail, a "smart" electric grid, a million electric cars on the roads, a "clean energy economy" creating millions of new green jobs.  And he spent lavishly to realize this dream. [...] Obama has spent billions of taxpayer dollars subsidizing windmills and solar plants as part of his vision of a "clean energy" future.  But despite his repeated claims about a huge increase in renewable energy production, renewables today make up just 11% of the nation's total energy production, according to the Energy Information Administration.  In mid-1983, the share of energy production comprised of renewables was... 11%.

100 trees felled for solar project in office park.  A company that manages an office park on Garret Mountain plans to build a large array of solar panel canopies over its parking lots that will generate enough energy to power two buildings on the site.  To make way for the canopies, the company recently cut down more than 100 trees in the grassy medians between rows of parking spaces on the property, near Garret Mountain Reservation in Woodland Park.  Putting a solar array on commercial property is part of a larger trend in New Jersey, one that is greatly encouraged by environmental groups wherever there is room to harness the sun's energy.  But the environmental irony in this case is hard to miss.

President Obama's Final Green Spending Spree.  President Obama's administration appears to be pushing out a final hundred million dollars in grants to foreign green projects, ahead of the January 20th handover to the new Trump administration.

OPIC and Renew Power Ventures Sign Commitment for 100 Megawatt Solar Farm in India.  The Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC), the U.S. Government's development finance institution, signed a commitment with ReNew of approximately $74 million for a 100 MW solar project in the Indian state of Telangana.  Announced during the 22nd session of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Conference of Parties (COP22), this project will diversify the country's power generation mix with a clean source of renewable power and help the country reduce GHG emissions.

It's Time to Stop Spending Taxpayer Dollars on Elon Musk and Cronyism.  The Senate Finance Committee and the House Ways and Means Committee have launched a probe into tax incentives paid to solar companies, according to The Wall Street Journal.  The committee probes, led by their respective Republican chairmen, Rep. Kevin Brady of Texas and Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah, have found an appropriate and disturbing target to begin this work.  SolarCity, a solar installation company set to be purchased by Tesla Motors Inc., is one of the seven companies named in the initial investigation.  Already grossly subsidized, Musk's SolarCity has become an albatross of waste, fraud, and abuse of tax payer dollars.

Hillary Clinton's big ideas for tanking the US economy.  [#3] Subsidize 500 million solar panels.  We tried these green-energy handouts under President Obama, and they failed.  Remember Solyndra?  That firm received some $500 million of taxpayer dollars and then went belly up.  The Institute for Energy Research estimates a price tag of $200 billion for these solar panels.  That's more than it cost to put a man on the moon during the Apollo project.  Let the free market pick the next great energy source, which may be clean-burning natural gas.

An examination of Future Energy Scenarios - Cost of Supply.  Despite having installed more than 38GW of renewable energy generating capacity in the last decade, we have reached a capacity crisis.  There is no hard evidence that this push for renewables has been an effective way to reduce CO2 emissions, and the cost has certainly been very large.  [...] Although we hear that the cost of renewable energy is coming down and, in some cases, can reach parity with conventional sources, this is misleading since it relates purely to the cost of generation and takes no account of necessary additional costs, particularly transmission and backup.  The scenarios envisaged by National Grid necessarily inflate the cost of electricity, in part because the gas generating plant needed for backup (with the impending closure of coal-fired stations, the sole use of fossil fuel in the system) have to operate at very low efficiency.

Green Overload.  The governor wants to make New York a "national leader" by having renewables provide 50 percent of the state's electricity by 2030 — a goal also known as "50 by 30" — while keeping unprofitable nuclear plants running. [...] The 50 by 30 mandate will require the expansion of solar- and wind-generated power production on a massive and unprecedented scale — without providing needed improvements to an already strained electric transmission system.  The PSC also failed to consider the added conventional generating capacity needed to back up renewables when the sun isn't shining and the wind isn't blowing.

Clouds gather in rooftop solar's biggest U.S. market.  California for years has required utilities to purchase excess rooftop solar power, paying homeowners in credits that lower their utility bills.  But this so-called "net-metering" mandate capped the number of people who qualified for the most attractive incentive.

Banks Question Cost of Chile's Renewable Energy Revolution.  The renewable energy companies that are promising the cheapest electricity in Chile's history may have overreached themselves as banks and investors balk at the risks. [...] The early signs of trouble are already there.  Four of the five companies that won contracts at an earlier auction in 2015 won't be ready to supply the electricity next year as pledged, despite having won contracts at an average price of $79.30 a megawatt-hour, compared with the average $47.50 a megawatt-hour at this year's auction.  Solarpack has transferred its contract to supply 100 gigawatt-hours to First Solar Inc. and will not build the two solar plants it had planned.  Ibereolica SL won a 195 gigawatt-hours contract, but will not be ready until April 2017, four months later than expected.

Rooftop Solar Companies Struggling to Stay Afloat.  According to a report by The New York Times, many people who have installed solar panels on their homes in the hopes of saving money on their electricity bills while protecting the environment are not experiencing the savings they were promised when they signed up, and many have yet to receive an adequate explanation from solar power companies that reveals why the savings have not materialized.  The Times story focusses on the deteriorating relationship between Fort Worth, Texas-based solar panel installer Global Efficient Energy (GEE) and its customers.  "I am surprised and pleased the Times has addressed this issue," said Marita Noon, executive director of the Citizens Alliance for Responsible Energy.  "I addressed it in my report Solar Power in the U.S., and I can assure you GEE is not the only company with unhappy customers.

Solar Generated Less Than 1% of U.S. Electricity in First Half of 2016.  Solar energy accounted for less than one percent of the total electricity generated in the U.S. during the first six months of 2016, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration's (EIA) latest Monthly Energy Review.  Table 7.2a of the report shows that the U.S. generated a total of 1,951,350 million kilowatthours (kWh) of electricity from January through June of this year.  But solar-generated electricity made up only a small fraction of the total.

How Intermittent Renewables Are Harming the Grid.  [Scroll down]  In fact, I have come to the rather astounding conclusion that even if wind turbines and solar PV could be built at zero cost, it would not make sense to continue to add them to the electric grid in the absence of very much better and cheaper electricity storage than we have today.  There are too many costs outside building the devices themselves.  It is these secondary costs that are problematic.  Also, the presence of intermittent electricity disrupts competitive prices, leading to electricity prices that are far too low for other electricity providers, including those providing electricity using nuclear or natural gas.  The tiny contribution of wind and solar to grid electricity cannot make up for the loss of more traditional electricity sources due to low prices.

This Mojave Desert solar plant kills 6,000 birds a year.  A macabre fireworks show unfolds each day along I-15 west of Las Vegas, as birds fly into concentrated beams of sunlight and are instantly incinerated, leaving wisps of white smoke against the blue desert sky.  Workers at the Ivanpah Solar Plant have a name for the spectacle:  "Streamers."  And the image-conscious owners of the 390-megawatt plant say they are trying everything they can think of to stop the slaughter.

Senators Demand Treasury Report on Investigation of Solar Companies.  The Obama administration gave Solyndra more than $535 million in federal loan guarantees as part of the administration's green-energy initiatives, but the company declared bankruptcy in September 2011.  Solyndra was not the only green-energy company to collapse after receiving federal tax credits, subsidies, or loan guarantees.  In 2012, Abound Solar declared bankruptcy after receiving more than $400 million in federal loan guarantees.  Abound Solar had knowingly sold underperforming solar panels for years, and when it closed its doors, it left behind piles of toxic, defective solar panels that were later covered in concrete and buried.  Spanish green-energy giant Abengoa, which has received more than $2 billion in federal and state taxpayer support, filed for bankruptcy protection in the United States in late March.  In April, SunEdison — one of the most government-subsidized companies in the United States and the self-proclaimed "largest green energy company" — filed for bankruptcy.  The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Department of Justice (DOJ) are investigating its financial dealings.

House GOP to Energy Department: Where are the green jobs?  The 2009 stimulus package gave $15 billion to the DOE's 1705 loan program.  However, the program suffered from three major bankruptcies[:]  The first major bankruptcy was Solyndra which got a $535 million loan guarantee and filed for bankruptcy in August 2011.  It was especially controversial since the company had substantial political connections.  Solyndra investor and billionaire George Kaiser — an Obama supporter — as well as other Solyndra executives and board members donated $87,050 total to President Obama's election campaign.  Next, Beacon Power declared Bankruptcy in October 2011 after receiving a $43 million loan guarantee along with another $29 million from the federal government and the state of Pennsylvania.  Abound Solar declared bankruptcy last year after drawing down on $70 million of a $400 million loan guarantee.  A Daily Caller News Foundation investigation later revealed that Abound was selling underperforming solar panels.

Can Solar Power Survive Without Government Subsidies?  Sunworks CEO Jim Nelson is not getting caught up in the political and environmental debate over clean energy versus fossil fuels, but rather focusing on the economics of solar energy.  "I don't see solar as a clean energy play and something that we ought to worry about as far as culture or what's in vogue or a cool president or whatever else.  It's really about economics.  If the economics of solar work, then it's a competitive business that ought to be paid attention to," Nelson told the FOX Business Network's Charles Payne.

Levelized Cost of Electricity from Existing Generation Resources.  The LCOE-E framework allows for cost comparisons that are relevant for today's energy policymakers.  For example, when all known costs are accurately included in the LCOE calculations, we find that existing coal ($39.9), nuclear ($29.1), and hydroelectric resources ($35.4) are about one-third of the cost of new wind resources ($107.4) on average and one-fourth of the cost of new PV solar resources ($140.3).  By increasing the transparency of the costs associated with policies favoring new resources over existing conventional resources, we hope to inform policymakers with the best available data and raise the level of the electricity policy debate.

VA Drops Millions on Delayed Solar Power Projects.  The Department of Veterans Affairs has spent more than $408 million to install solar panels on its medical facilities in recent years, despite many of the projects experiencing significant delays and some of the systems not becoming operational at all.  The VA has failed to effectively plan and manage these solar panel projects, resulting in significant delays and additional costs, according to a report released by the agency's inspector general last week.  The watchdog conducted an audit of 11 of the 15 solar projects awarded between fiscal years 2010 and 2013 that were still in progress as of May last year.  The investigation, which was completed in March, found that only two of the 11 solar panel projects were fully completed.

Blinded By The Sun .  We are constantly being bombarded with feel-good stories about wind and solar power generation and, indeed, billions of dollars have been expended worldwide on these boondoggles.  This has produced little in the way of practical, base-load power, it has certainly spawned an endless supply of studies telling us how good renewables will be for the economy.  This alleged benefit is said to be over and above those technologies' CO2-curbing potential.  Trouble is, the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) tells us that, in 2010, renewables made up only 20% of global electricity production, of which 16% was from hydroelectricity.  Wind power contributed 1.4% and solar less than 1%.

Germany Votes To Abandon Most Green Energy Subsidies .  Germany's legislature voted Friday [7/8/2016] to sharply cut back on subsidies and other financial incentives supporting green energy due to the strain wind and solar power placed on the country's electricity grid.  Germany's government plans to replace most of the subsidies for local green energy with a system of competitive auctions where the cheapest electricity wins.  The average German pays 39 cents per kilowatt-hour for electricity due to intense fiscal support for green energy.  The average American only spends 10.4 cents per kilowatt-hour.

Low Energy.  [Scroll down]  In the late 70's, everyone new that in the future, cars would be electric and be charged by solar panels.  Every house would have a rooftop solar generator.  Fossil fuels would go away entirely.  The fact that none of this happened did not stop the dreamers from dusting off the solar fantasy again in the 2000's.  I'm not sure, but I think the last big solar panel plant in the US shut down last year.

Wind and Solar Power Simply Don't Work.  [Scroll down]  The problem we have in Australia is when we talk renewable energy we are talking wind and solar only — low value, expensive, unreliable, high capital cost, land hungry, intermittent energy.  According to the Department of Industry and Science wind currently generates 4.1 percent and solar 2 percent of Australia's electricity.  But even this is highly misleading because it is such low value power.  You could close it down tomorrow (which it regularly does by itself) and it would make no difference to supply.  If we talk about total energy, as opposed to just electricity, wind and solar represent 1 percent of Australia's energy consumption.  This despite billions of dollars of investment, subsidies, creative tariffs, mandates, and so on.

Despite Huge Investments, Renewable Energy Isn't Winning.  For hydrocarbon doomsayers, there's good news and bad news.  In 2015, there were record investments in renewable energy, and record capacity was added, much of it in emerging economies.  Yet despite the huge investment, the global share of fossil fuels is not shrinking very fast.  Renewables such as wind, solar and geothermal still account for a tiny share of energy production, and there are factors that may inhibit their growth in the next few years.  REN21, the international renewable energy association backed by the United Nations Environment Program, has summarized impressive developments in the sector in 2015.  Total investment in renewable power and fuels reached $285.9 billion, an all-time record, and renewable power capacity, including hydropower, increased by 148 gigawatts — another record — to 1.8 terawatts.  For the sixth consecutive year, investment in new renewable capacity was higher than in hydrocarbon-burning power plants.

NECN Investigates:  Solar Panel Dangers.  Firefighters may not rush into your burning home or business as quickly if there are solar panels on top.  "Any kind of delay can affect our ability to rescue people or our ability to extinguish the fire," said Chief Jeffrey Winward of the fire department in Lowell, Massachusetts.  Winward says crews may take longer to assess a scene before going in because he'd rather see a structure burn to the ground than put firefighters at risk of electrocution.  "It is enough to seriously injure or kill someone," he said.

Congress Demands Treasury Department Report on Solar Companies Investigation.  The Obama administration gave Solyndra a federal loan guarantee of more than $535 million as part of the administration's green-energy initiatives, but in September 2011 the company declared bankruptcy.  Solyndra was not the only green-energy company to collapse after receiving federal tax credits, subsidies, or loan guarantees.  In 2012, Abound Solar declared bankruptcy after receiving more than $400 million in federal loan guarantees.  Abound Solar had knowingly sold underperforming solar panels for years, and when it closed its doors, it left behind piles of toxic, defective solar panels that were later covered in concrete and buried.  Spanish green-energy giant Abengoa, which has received more than $2 billion in federal and state taxpayer support, filed for bankruptcy protection in the United States in late March.  In April, SunEdison — one of the most government-subsidized companies in the United States and the self-proclaimed "largest green energy company" — filed for bankruptcy.  The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) are investigating its financial dealings.

Wind and solar a waste of money for UK, Prof Sir David MacKay said in final interview.  Wind turbines and solar panels are a waste of money if Britain wants reliable low carbon electricity supplies through the winter, the late Professor Sir David MacKay said in his final interview. [...] He criticised the "appalling delusion" that renewable sources of power could simply be scaled up and paired with battery storage to provide all the UK's energy needs, citing the high costs and large areas of land that would be required.

The Dangers of Building Residential Solar Come to Light in Nevada.  You might think that all solar companies are essentially the same, installing solar systems on rooftops or open fields where there's an abundance of sunlight.  But the reality is that how solar companies do business varies widely across the industry, and knowing how a company is positioned and where the industry is headed can mean the difference between making a profitable investment and a losing one.  Recent news that Vivint Solar, the second largest residential solar company in the U.S., is pulling out of Nevada after just two weeks shows one of the risks solar companies face.

Germany Runs Up Against the Limits of Renewables.  At one point this month renewable energy sources briefly supplied close to 90 percent of the power on Germany's electric grid.  But that doesn't mean the world's fourth-largest economy is close to being run on zero-carbon electricity.  In fact, Germany is giving the rest of the world a lesson in just how much can go wrong when you try to reduce carbon emissions solely by installing lots of wind and solar.  After years of declines, Germany's carbon emissions rose slightly in 2015, largely because the country produces much more electricity than it needs.  That's happening because even if there are times when renewables can supply nearly all of the electricity on the grid, the variability of those sources forces Germany to keep other power plants running.

The Energy Return of Solar PV.  A new study by Ferroni and Hopkirk estimates the ERoEI of temperate latitude solar photovoltaic (PV) systems to be 0.83.  If correct, that means more energy is used to make the PV panels than will ever be recovered from them during their 25 year lifetime.  A PV panel will produce more CO2 than if coal were simply used directly to make electricity.  Worse than that, all the CO2 from PV production is in the atmosphere today, while burning coal to make electricity, the emissions would be spread over the 25 year period.

ERoEI for Beginners.  The Energy Return on Energy Invested (ERoEI or EROI) of any energy gathering system is a measure of that system's efficiency.  The concept was originally derived in ecology and has been transferred to analyse human industrial society.  In today's energy mix, hydroelectric power ± nuclear power have values greater than 50.  At the other end of the scale, solar PV and biofuels have values less than 5.

Lessons from technology development for energy and sustainability.  [Scroll down]  Solar at present without large-scale storage could only provide about 5% of the electricity needs averaged over a year and require city scale areas.  Only nuclear energy and fossil fuels are available now and only some form of carbon capture and sequestration might make any difference to carbon emissions by 2050 for megacities.  Once exceptions in the decarbonization project are made for megacities, the integrity of the debate on decarbonization is lost. [...] The present renewable energy sources cannot empower most of the world's large city population now, and will provide for a smaller fraction of the megacity population in 2050.  The initial schemes of large-scale projects such as Desertec have been abandoned by investors not convinced by the returns or the required decades of political stability needed to secure those returns.

Why Solar Energy Is Bad for the Environment.  Everyone knows that solar energy is unreliable and expensive.  The point that isn't made often enough (although Steve has written about it here on quite a few occasions) is that solar energy is also bad for the environment.  Which raises the question, what, then, is it good for?

No "Major Scandal" in Obama Administration?  Solar panel business Solyndra received more than half a billion dollars as part of the administration's green energy program, before going bankrupt.  Its executives took substantial bonuses before the layoffs began.  And, a Solyndra investor was also a major bundler for Obama, demonstrating a conflict of interest when the administration refused to turn over more documents as part of a Congressional investigation.  And yes, the [Washington] Post reported on its front page that the Obama administration had asked the company to "delay announcing it would lay off workers until after the hotly contested November 2010 midterm elections that imperiled Democratic control of Congress."  But NPR ran an article last year victoriously announcing that "Now that the loan program is turning a profit, those critics are silent" — as if that had anything to do with the crony capitalism of the Solyndra scandal.

5 environmentalist ideas that have spectacularly backfired.  [#1]  Solar power:  Getting energy from the sun is one of the green lobby's favorite ideas, despite the fact that solar power isn't particularly cost-effective or efficient.  Now add another downside to the list:  bird killings.  Turns out a solar plant in the Mojave Desert that reflects concentrated sun rays with gigantic mirrors has become a virtual death ray for unlucky avian passers-over.  Workers at the plant reportedly call the birds "streamers" for the visible smoke that's produced when they vaporize above the plant.  Estimates for the death toll thus far range from 1,000 to 28,000.  The plant cost $2.2 billion to build and activists are now urging the plant's owner to halt construction on an even bigger solar fryer.

Ivanpah Solar Plant Catches Fire, But Taxpayers Get Burned.  When Ivanpah started operations in 2014, the Department of Energy hailed its "innovative power-tower technology" and credited $1.6 billion in federal subsidized loans — as well as hundreds of millions in tax credits — for making the 4,000-acre solar plant a reality.  It's been pretty much downhill for Ivanpah ever since.  The latest problem for the plant — which is owned by BrightSource Energy Inc., NRG Energy and Alphabet Inc.'s Google — came last week when it literally set itself on fire.

Obama-Backed Solar Plant Literally Incinerates Itself.  The world's largest solar energy plant known for incinerating birds just got a taste of its own medicine.  A fire at the plant Thursday morning [5/19/2016], which may have been caused by "misaligned" mirrors used to reflect sunlight at boiler towers, broke out in the facility's interior — literally scorching parts of the plant.  NRG Energy, the company operating the Ivanpah solar plant in southern California, was forced to shut down one of its generating towers and is investigating if mirrors, or heliostats, failed and torched a boiling tower.  Now, the plant, which got $1.6 billion from the Obama administration, will only be able to generate electricity from one of its three towers.

Germany basically had to pay people to use electricity Sunday.  Germany hit a new milestone in renewable energy on Sunday [5/15/2016], generating so much power at one point that customers were essentially being paid to turn on their lights or charge their phones.  Quartz reports that around 1pm Sunday, about 87 percent of the power being used in Germany was coming from wind, solar, hydro, and biomass power plants.  In 2015, the average was 33 percent.  There was so much power being produced that the cost of electricity briefly dropped to -$149 per megawatt-hour, according to the Independent.

Economics Can't Support the New "Solar Economy".  [Scroll down]  Analysts will tell everyone that solar leasing is a bad deal for homeowners.  For those who are truly dedicated to greening their home with solar energy, the good move is to purchase the panels, not lease them.  The leasing model is a complicated scam by the solar corporations as a way to take minimal up-front risk and profit for years and years off of homeowners.  What the net metering pricing fights have revealed is that much of the solar leasing business model is unsustainable without central regulators setting artificially high prices for net metering buy-back.  When Nevada lowered their net metering prices from what's called the "retail rate" (the rate that customers buy from the power company) to the "wholesale rate" (the bulk rate for power generation), many solar leasing companies protested.  Some exited the market entirely.

The Nuclear Reaction.  In 2015, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) called for a reduction of 32 percent in the 2005 levels of carbon dioxide emissions. [...] The EPA guidelines were not written with global warming in mind.  Nuclear power is already the greatest source of clean electricity in the United States and could largely eliminate fossil fuels by 2030.  The guidelines seem designed to increase the use of solar and wind energy in the United States, though they will also increase the use of greenhouse gas (GHG)-emitting natural gas.  But wind and solar energy do not provide completely clean electricity.  They are variable renewable energy (VRE) sources, both low in concentration and intermittent.  It takes resources to collect and concentrate them, and even more resources to make them available on demand.

Why EU renewable energy figures are misleading:
Europe requires 150% renewable energy to become fossil-free.  The EU has a target of 20% renewable energy in 2020. In 2014, 16% was reached and thus, it has been concluded that the EU is well on its way to achieve the target.  After all, thousands of wind turbines are being built in our countryside and millions of solar panels are being installed on our rooftops.  I assume that many readers of Energy Post are aware of the 16% level that we are supposed to have reached.  But I wonder whether they have ever tried to find out how this percentage was calculated?  I did — and it turned out to be far from straightforward.

Officials Vote for Mandatory Solar Panels on New Buildings in San Francisco.  This week, a new law mandating the installation of solar panels on new buildings was passed with a unanimous vote by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors.  The new bill, which goes into effect in January 2017, requires that all new buildings — commercial or residential — be fixed with solar panels if the building stands at 10 stories or less.  Builders are required to ensure that at least 15% of the roof on new structures be "solar ready," meaning they cannot be shaded or obstructed from sunlight.

What's the Point of a Solar Plane?  [Scroll down]  Any regular reader knows full well that I only write mockingly of both wind and solar and the people who promote such folly.  And that is exactly what this round-the-world (assuming they make it) trip is — folly.  Mr. Piccard and his 60 man (and woman and probably other unspecified genders) team can dream all they like of no fuel and no pollution until the methane-emitting cows come home, but the practical use of something like this is exactly ZERO.  So far the project has cost approximately $170 million.  $170 million to develop a mammoth aircraft which holds one person and that one person must be able to fly the thing and is relegated to a tiny cabin which is not pressurized, or heated or air conditioned.  There's some luxury accommodations for you.  And it's taken them 12 years just to get this far.

Crony Capitalism and the Spigot of Government Subsidies.  SolarCity got over $300 million in federal grants and tax incentives, in addition to state and local subsidies meant to create an artificial demand for solar energy.  In a funny twist, the company even moved in to old office space from Solyndra, the bankrupt crony solar panel company run by large donors to President Barack Obama's campaigns and subsidized by the infamous Department of Energy's 1705 loan program.

Renewables are useless: The Evidence is Overwhelming.  Al Gore has a problem.  He seems to want people to believe that only climate skeptics oppose renewables.  The truth is, a small but growing number of prominent greens, openly acknowledge that renewables in their current form are not a scalable replacement for fossil fuels.

Pelosi's Husband Invested in Solar Firm Weeks Before Lucrative Expansion.  House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi's husband bought up to a quarter million dollars of stock in a now financially troubled green energy company just weeks before it announced a major 2014 acquisition that sent stock prices soaring, public records show.  SunEdison told regulators last week that it is eyeing bankruptcy under the weight of $11.7 million in debt.  But in late 2014, investors were bullish on the company, which manufactures and operates solar and wind power facilities.  Its 2014 purchase of wind energy company First Wind "further bolstered the reputation of the company," wrote one market-watcher at the time.  "Perhaps unsurprisingly, SunEdison's stock soared an astounding 29% on news of this acquisition alone."

Another Taxpayer-Funded Solar-Energy Company Fails.  The collapse of a Spanish-based multinational renewable energies company could cause election-year embarrassment not only to President Obama, Hillary Clinton, the Clinton Foundation and the Democratic Party, but also to Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz and his wife Heidi, through their ties to Goldman Sachs.  Announced Tuesday [5/12/2016], Seville-headquartered renewables multinational firm Abengoa plans to sell off four solar photovoltaic power plants in Spain for a collective value of $65.13 million, $57.26 million and a net cash flow of $13.9 million, helping the company meet its debt-restructuring targets set out in its feasibility plan.

Rooftop solar companies will only play if the game is stacked in their favor.  Even with the benefit of tax credits, low-interest loans, and cash grants that state and federal governments have bestowed on them, the solar industry is struggling.  We've seen Abengoa — which I've followed for years — file for bankruptcy.  Ivanpah, the world's biggest solar power tower project in the California desert, is threatened with closure due to underperformance.  Then there is SunEdison, the biggest renewable energy developer in the world.  It's on the verge of bankruptcy as its stock price plunged from more than $30 to below $.50 — a more than 90 percent drop in the past year.  All of these recent failures magnify the solar industry's black eye that first swelled up nearly five years ago with the Solyndra bankruptcy.  Worried about self-preservation, and acting in its own best interest — rather than that of consumers specifically, and America in general — industry groups have sprung up to defend the favored-status energy policies and attack anyone who disagrees with the incentive-payment business model.

Chart: Power Is A Lot More Expensive Under Obama.  [Scroll down]  "President Obama openly ran in 2008 on a platform of making electricity rates 'skyrocket' and bankrupting anyone who dared to build a coal plant in the United States," Travis Fisher, an economist at the Institute for Energy Research, told The Daily Caller News Foundation.  "Now, more than seven years into his presidency, it should come as no surprise that his efforts have taken a widespread toll in the form of higher electricity rates for nearly every state in the union."  Despite falling generation costs, electrical utilities are being forced by the government to pay for billions of dollars of government-mandated "improvements" and taxpayer support for new wind and solar power systems.

California Regulations Force Taxpayers to Support Ineffective Solar Plant.  Research claims that renewable energy is more cost effective than fossil fuels at producing electricity.  But at the Ivanpah Solar Power Facility in California, taxpayers are actually losing out on their money.  Ivanpah, the 377-megawatt, world's largest solar thermal plant located in the Mojave Desert, fell short of production in 2014 and 2015.  Managers attributed the shortfall to less sunny weather than expected, but the plant's problems extend far past weather forecasts.  Despite being owned by three private companies — Google, BrightSource Energy Inc. and NRG Energy — the plant received $1.6 billion in loan guarantees from the U.S. Department of Energy.  It is paid four to five times more per-megawatt hour than natural gas plants.

A Solar Power Plant vs.  A Natural Gas Power Plant: Capital Cost — Apples to Apples.  Here is a simple example that illustrates why current solar technology will be hard-pressed to replace existing carbon-fired power plants.  Let's suppose that a power company is planning to scrap a coal-fired power plant and wants to replace it with a new plant.  Furthermore, let's assume that the old plant to be scrapped is in Arizona.  The options for the new plant are natural gas and solar.  The company wants a simple, ball-park analysis of the front-end cost to build each of these options.

The Catch-22 of Energy Storage.  Several recent analyses of the inputs to our energy systems indicate that, against expectations, energy storage cannot solve the problem of intermittency of wind or solar power.  Not for reasons of technical performance, cost, or storage capacity, but for something more intractable:  there is not enough surplus energy left over after construction of the generators and the storage system to power our present civilization.  The problem is analysed in an important paper by Weißbach et al.  in terms of energy returned on energy invested, or EROEI — the ratio of the energy produced over the life of a power plant to the energy that was required to build it.  It takes energy to make a power plant — to manufacture its components, mine the fuel, and so on.  The power plant needs to make at least this much energy to break even.  A break-even powerplant has an EROEI of 1.  But such a plant would pointless, as there is no energy surplus to do the useful things we use energy for.

The laughable idea that renewable energy is or ever will be 'least cost'.  [Scroll down]  It certainly can't be least-cost if you shutter working coal plants to start up replacement renewable plants.  As it is, electricity generation from new plants is more expensive than electricity from existing plants; that'll be worse when you replace an existing plant generating electricity from an efficient source like coal with ones relying on vastly inefficient sources.  It's definitely not least cost when you fully account for the realities of nondispatchable renewable energy.  Those would include their well-known inefficiencies and flat-out inability to work when either the sun isn't shining enough or the wind isn't blowing.  Nature, economics, simple math, and physics all work against nondispatchable renewable energy sources with respect to whether they can ever be cost-competitive with traditional sources.

We Cannot Afford "Free" Wind and Solar Energy.  While driving the mostly empty and flat 1,000 miles from Houston to Colorado Springs recently, I noticed something I hadn't seen much just a few years ago — lots of wind farms dotting the landscape, but none anywhere near even small population centers.  And another funny thing, though:  Invariably, many of the turbines weren't moving and one of the largest appeared to have about 100 turbines, yet I counted just three in action.  How can this be?  Having paid for the land, the turbines, and those long transmission lines don't providers want a maximum of the machines going?  Nope.  Because, you see, wind farms — and solar farms for the same reasons — don't make their money by generating electricity.  They do it by generating government subsidies.

Wind and solar have destroyed the ability of the market to signal price.  Before the election, high electricity prices made the Big Six energy companies everyone's favourite whipping boys.  A report by the competition watchdog exonerated them.  Government-driven social, environmental and network costs were the main drivers of rising electricity bills, the Competition and Markets Authority found.  Now the Big Six have put themselves squarely back in the frame.  A 125-page report by the electricity industry lobby group, Energy UK, supports phasing out cheap coal power and demands more subsidies for wind and solar.

Taxpayers Are Footing Bill for Solar Project That Doesn't Work.  As every ten-year-old who ever got a sweater for a birthday present has been told, "It's the thought that counts."  That seems to be the guiding principle at the Department of Energy and the California Public Utilities Commission when it comes to solar power.  The latest example is the $2.2 billion Ivanpah solar thermal plant in California. [...] Brightsource, which is privately held, is owned by a virtual who's who of those that don't need subsidies from taxpayers and ratepayers.

Why This Governor Opposes a Bipartisan Bill to Subsidize Solar Energy.  Maine Gov. Paul LePage is fighting a bipartisan proposal designed to boost solar power development in the state by a factor of 12, arguing that it would benefit only the wealthy.  At a business expo Thursday [3/24/2016] in central Maine, LePage, a Republican, warned that the solar power bill would increase electricity costs to 22 cents per kilowatt hour.

Obama-Backed Solar Plant Could Be Shut Down For Not Producing Enough Energy.  California regulators may force a massive solar thermal power plant in the Mojave Desert to shut down after years of under-producing electricity — not to mention the plant was blinding pilots flying over the area and incinerating birds.  The Ivanpah solar plant could be shut down if state regulators don't give it more time to meet electricity production promises it made as part of its power purchase agreements with utilities, according to The Wall Street Journal.  Ivanpah, which got a $1.6 billion loan guarantee from the Obama administration, only produced a fraction of the power state regulators expected it would.  The plant only generated 45 percent of expected power in 2014 and only 68 percent in 2015, according to government data.

SolarCity Corp. Backed Itself Into a Corner With MyPower Loan.  There's growing evidence that loans for residential solar installations will eventually be the main source of financing, changing the lease dominated industry we see today. [...] SolarCity could see this transition coming and in late 2014 it introduced a loan product called MyPower.  Like a solar lease, it tied the customer's payment to a solar system's energy production, but unlike a lease, the homeowner owned the system once the loan was paid off.  But last week the company shut down MyPower after the product failed to take off.

Solar City stock, already down more than 60% this year, continues to dive.  SolarCity Corp.'s stock has lost more than 60% of its value since the start of the year, and shares continued to dive Thursday [2/11/2016], two days after the Northern California solar company reported disappointing fourth-quarter results.  Shares of the San Mateo firm, the nation's largest solar panel installer, closed Thursday at $16.67, down $1.96, or nearly 11%.  The company's stock plunged 30% in after-hours trading Tuesday, after its financial results were released, to its lowest point since 2013, Raymond James analyst Pavel Molchanov said.

5 Reasons Why We Shouldn't Keep Subsidizing Wind and Solar Energy.  Proponents of wind and solar energy subsides argue that they are necessary for any number of reasons, such as business certainty, to stimulate the economy, to preserve jobs, to combat global warming, to compete internationally, and the like.  But in the long run, subsidies actually hurt the very industries they're supposed to help by disincentivizing innovation and making U.S. companies less competitive at home and abroad.  The real irony, if not tragedy, is that a free market is far more likely to yield the growth and innovation that subsidy supporters claim to want.  Each year, when Congress tries to extend, re-extend, or retroactively extend targeted tax credits for renewable energy, Congress hurts long-term innovation and growth.

Mega-solar company slashing jobs despite gov't benefits.  The solar industry seemed to be looking at a bright future in 2016 as Congress renewed an endangered tax break for another five years.  Yet, in a troubling sign for a business continuously infused with such government benefits, America's largest solar contractor may be facing its worst year on record.  SolarCity, owned by billionaire Elon Musk, is now contending with mass layoffs, plummeting stock and mounting debt.  "This is what happens when you have a government that artificially props up a sector with subsidies so it can generate more production than they otherwise would," said energy analyst Nick Loris, a research fellow with the conservative Heritage Foundation.

SolarCity Is Slashing 550 Jobs.  Solar panel installer SolarCity said it would cut 550 jobs in Nevada, two weeks after the state's utilities commission approved changes that would reduce credits customers receive for selling excess solar power to the grid.

SolarCity's Silver Spoon.  If you own a business — maybe a taco stand, a dress shop, or an insurance agency — you know it takes a lot of hard work, good market analysis, a better product or service than your competition, and advertising. [...] If, however, you are a politically favored business — say solar — your story is different.  Your growth is dependent on government generosity.

Did Media Misquote NC Anti-Solar Residents To Make Them Look Stupid?  Numerous left-wing media outlets have repeatedly misquoted citizens of Woodland, N.C., after the city government voted to reject a proposed solar farm.  An article in the Huffington Post claimed local resident Bobby Mann said the proposed solar farm would "stop plants from growing and suck up all the energy from the sun," during his testimony to the Woodland Town Council, citing an article in the Roanoke-Chowan Herald-News.  However, the Herald-News only directly quotes Bobby Mann as saying "You're killing your town, [a]ll the young people are going to move out."  Other media outlets repeated the misquote.

Hillary Clinton's billionaire fundraiser host got sweet deal in Solyndra collapse.  Hillary Clinton's claim that she is not beholden to her wealthy donors will come under renewed scrutiny Friday [12/11/2015] when the Democratic front-runner raises fresh cash for her presidential bid at the home of George Kaiser, a billionaire whose firm was the biggest investor in the troubled Solyndra stimulus project — and who managed to walk away with a lucrative profit at the expense of taxpayers.  Mrs. Clinton will make a stop at the Tulsa, Oklahoma, home of Mr. Kaiser on Friday afternoon, just days after the former secretary of state rolled out policy proposals aimed at stopping powerful corporations from taking advantage of American taxpayers.

Federal Fumbles 2015.  [Scroll down to page 92]  In 2013 American families gave more than $5 billion to the solar industry through a combination of direct expenditures, tax credits, and federally funded research and development.  The investment only added 4,750 megawatts of solar energy to American energy generation in 2013.  Or put a different way, the taxpayers paid a little more than $1 million dollars for each megawatt added.  This may sound like a high amount of additional generation.  But if a megawatt of solar power can power about 164 homes, the federal subsidy breaks down to about $6,418 per home now powered by solar.

Inconvenient timing: On eve of Paris Climate Conference, Spain's Abengoa Solar goes bankrupt.  All the fancy people are about to hop on jets and fly to the Paris Climate Conference so they can express how much they don't like things like, uh, jet fuel.  And one of the things we're going to hear is how we need to be more like Europeans when it comes to green energy. [...] Abengoa, one of Spain's wealthiest companies, has solar plants all around the world.  Yeah, why can't we be more like them?  Except today, this is the number one news item in Spain:  Abengoa is bankrupt.

Report: Solar Industry Heading Toward a Financial Bubble.  Myriad government schemes designed to promote or require the use of solar energy threaten to create a financial bubble similar to the one that befell the housing sector in 2007-08, concludes a new report by the Taxpayers Protection Alliance (TPA).  The TPA report, titled From Washington to Wall Street: How Government Policies Are Skewing Solar Investments, describes the housing bubble of the 2000s as follows:  "[G]overnment-imposed rules that incentivized banks to securitize mortgages that in a free market would have been undesirable (low quality and high risk), along with the government purchases of those mortgages, burned the house down."  TPA sees a similar pattern emerging in government promotion of solar power through subsidies, mandates, and other programs.  "Much like the government-created housing bubble, ... handouts at the federal and state level are creating a solar bubble that taxpayers are propping up, and it will be the taxpayers and investors who take the hit when the industry comes crashing down," the report states.

The Cynicism of the Clean Power Plan.  If you want to irritate promoters of the Clean Power Plan, just state the obvious:  It's going to increase electricity prices, and that will be bad for the poor and the middle class. [...] Eurostat data from Spain, which has also been on a renewable-energy binge, tells a similar story.  Between 2007 and 2014, residential electric rates in Spain jumped by 70 percent.  Over that same time period, wind capacity increased by about 50 percent and solar capacity grew about seven-fold.  Spanish households are now paying some of the highest electricity prices in Europe, about $0.27 per kilowatt-hour, a rate that is more than twice the U.S. average.

On eve of Paris climate summit, Britain pulls the plug on renewables.  With breathtaking abruptness, the British government has in recent months slashed its support for solar power and other renewable forms of energy, leaving a once-promising industry with grim prospects and throwing into doubt the country's commitment to clean power.  The moves have baffled environmentalists, business leaders and even many government allies.  Britain has long been in the vanguard of efforts to combat global warming.

The Greatest Energy Chart Ever.  The original energy crisis goes back to the Jimmy Carter administration.  There was a shortage of gasoline, which the Carter administration made worse by fixing oil prices.  [...] [F]or thirty-eight years, our government has been predicting the demise of fossil fuel energy and subsidizing, to varying degrees but amounting cumulatively to many billions of dollars, solar and wind energy.  What has the result been?  This chart tells the story.  It plots global energy consumption from 1965 to the present; you can see the contributions of solar and wind power as a virtually straight line, approximating zero, across the bottom of the graph.

Taxpayer-backed solar plant [is] actually a carbon polluter.  Located in Southern California's Mojave Desert, the $2.2 billion Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System benefited from a $1.6 billion Energy Department loan guarantee, and a $539 million Treasury Department stimulus grant to help pay off the loan.  Yet it is producing carbon emissions at nearly twice the amount that compels power plants and companies to participate in the state's cap-and-trade program.  That's because the plant relies on natural gas as a supplementary fuel.

Solar batteries — are they really green?  Some businesses are being sold battery systems to store energy, but not necessarily from solar or other renewable resources.  In many cases, such installations are designed purely to profit from storing grid energy at night, then selling power back to the grid during the day when electricity prices are higher.  But even if coupled with some rooftop solar, this won't reduce pollution and may, in fact, increase harmful emissions and dependence on fossil fuels.

Can We Rely on Wind and Solar Energy?  Is "green" energy, particularly wind and solar energy, the solution to our climate and energy problems?  Or should we be relying on things like natural gas, nuclear energy, and even coal for our energy needs and environmental obligations?  [Video clip]

Why I'm Still Not a Member of the Solar Energy Industries Association.  As recently as a decade ago, a good part of the solar industry was following a healthy free-market path.  Solarex in Maryland turned a profit under the direction of Harvey Forest.  But around 2006, the federal government began heavily subsidizing solar installations.  From that grew net metering laws and other state and utility subsidies for what otherwise was uneconomic energy.  By 2010 or so, I could have almost 90% of my solar home system paid for with free subsidy money.  But of course the money is not free.  It is taken from the pockets of ratepayers and taxpayers to subsidize on-grid solar home systems, which are really feel-good installations of the more affluent.

When Enron, NYT Declared Solar 'Competitive" with Fossil Fuels (1994).  This post reproduces a front-page story in the New York Times business section that excitedly reported a breakthrough with solar energy as represented by a heady energy company named Enron.  Formed in the mid-1980s, Enron had just entered into the solar business and was destined to revitalize — if not save — the U.S. wind industry just a few years later.  Good press, for a half century now, has created an Enron-like illusion of the coming competitiveness and profitability of solar and wind energies for on-grid electricity.  Basic energy physics explains why the sun's (dilute) flow cannot compete against the sun's stored (dense) energy embedded in natural gas, coal, and oil.

Massive Solar Power Plant Emits 46,000 Tons of CO2.  President Obama once praised it as a shining example of America's clean energy future.  "With projects like this one," he said at the site of a solar plant just before construction started, "we're putting Americans to work producing clean, home-grown American energy."  And his Department of Energy showered $1.6 billion in loan guarantees, as well as $600 million in tax credits.  The plant is the Ivanpah Solar Power Facility, a behemoth that uses hundreds of thousands of mirrors spread out over more than five square miles of the Mojave Desert.

Do Utilities Own the Sun?  A group of customers cut their electric bills via solar power panels on their rooftops.  Those solar power panels generate excess power during the day, and the customers then get credited for that power when they draw electricity at night.  But the state's biggest utility, Rocky Mountain Power, says, not so fast.  It effectively is saying those solar-loving customers are leeching off the electric grid by not paying for their use of the electric grid's fixed costs, like the wires and poles that deliver electricity to their lightbulbs.

Report: Solar Industry Heading Toward a Financial Bubble.  Myriad government schemes designed to promote or require the use of solar energy threaten to create a financial bubble similar to the one that befell the housing sector in 2007-08, concludes a new report by the Taxpayers Protection Alliance (TPA). [...] "Much like the government-created housing bubble, ... handouts at the federal and state level are creating a solar bubble that taxpayers are propping up, and it will be the taxpayers and investors who take the hit when the industry comes crashing down," the report states.

Reality Check: Solar Is Not The Cheapest Form Of Energy.  A recent article breathlessly noted "And the Cheapest Electricity in America is...Solar!" [... But] the plant discussed in the story, First Solar's Playa Solar 2 project, which is located in Nevada, produces solar power cheaply.  Given the location and size of the plant (100 MW in Nevada), this should be just about optimal for achieving low-cost power from solar panels.  Which implies that other locations will be more expensive; [...]

Could the U.S. Meet Its Electricity Needs With Solar Energy?  At Watts Up With That?, Tom Tamarkin and Barrie Lawson have authored one of the more entertaining scientific articles I have read in a long time.  They actually undertake to do the math: what would it require to replace existing fossil fuel and nuclear power plants with solar energy as current plants are phased out over the next several decades? [...] One could tinker with assumptions forever, but the bottom line is blindingly obvious:  for the United States to actually try to transition to solar power as its sole or principal source of electricity is in practice impossible.  Moreover, the attempt, if made, would be an economic and environmental catastrophe.  It isn't going to happen.

Uncle Sam's Solar Racket — A Cesspool Of Waste And Corruption.  The Department of Energy's Inspector General revealed last week that the legendary solar-panel manufacturer Solyndra — a poster baby of the Obama stimulus — lied to the feds to get a $535 million loan guarantee before going bust in 2011.  Solyndra is a cautionary tale, but the Obama Administration is still throwing caution to the sun.  The IG report, which follows a four-year investigation by the IG and FBI, describes how Solyndra engaged in a "pattern of false and misleading assertions," including inflating the value of corporate contracts and sales, to win a giant loan guarantee in 2009.

Not all energy is created equal.  [Scroll down]  Those "renewable energy tax credits" are mainly two:  the wind Production Tax Credit (PTC) and solar Investment Tax Credit (ITC).  Like the oil-export ban, the wind PTC is an archaic policy that has no place in today's modern reality of energy abundance.  Passed by Congress in 1992, the PTC pays the wind industry for every kilowatt-hour of electricity generated over a ten-year period.  No other mature energy source — natural gas, oil, or coal — can claim a similar carve out based on how much product they sell.  The subsidy is so lavish that wind developers can sometimes sell their electricity at a loss and still profit.  The New York Times has described this as wind's "cannibal behavior" on the power grid.

Obama pledges $120M toward solar power, clean energy.  The Obama administration announced Wednesday morning a series of efforts worth more than $120 million aimed at boosting solar and other clean energy sources.  The initiatives focus on the Department of Energy, where the bulk of the funding will go to programs to develop solar power technology and get it into homes, businesses and other facilities.

The Big Sunshiny Lie.  The important thing to know about solar and wind power, and other so-called "renewable" sources of energy, is that they aren't necessary.  Au the contraire, their dominance of the energy mix would be a disaster for the republic.  Solar and wind create trifling amounts of power at a multiple of the cost of power made available by fossil fuels.  Increased reliance on pricy power from wind and solar would drive up the overall cost of energy, which in turn would drive up the cost of everything.  Everything!  Not just individual power bills, which would be bad enough.  It takes energy to produce, transport, and market all the goods Americans take for granted.  Even our service economy is a heavy user of energy.  Wind and solar power are also unreliable.  The sun doesn't always shine and the wind doesn't always blow.  This isn't going to change.

The President's Clean Energy Farce.  Green energy investments are a guaranteed flop, the kind of failure only a shady Broadway producer could envision.  This current green energy production really got underway when the economic "stimulus" set aside $80 billion to subsidize politically connected energy projects, according to the Heritage Foundation.  Since the halcyon days of the stimulus, 1,900 investigations have been opened to probe stimulus fraud and about 600 convictions have been secured by prosecutors.  What is more, about 10 percent of the Obama-backed green companies have gone bankrupt or out of business.  But Obama does not let the facts get in the way of a good, green story.

Solyndra misled government to get $535M solar project loan: report.  Solyndra, the solar panel manufacturer who took more than $500 million from President Obama's stimulus then went bust, sticking taxpayers for the loss, lied to federal officials to secure the loan, the Energy Department's inspector general said in a report released Wednesday [8/26/2015].  But the Obama administration goofed too, and may have cut corners in fully vetting the project because of "political pressure" from top Democrats and Solyndra itself, the investigators said in their report, which took four years to complete.

Obama: $12 billion new federal loan guarantees for renewables.  The Obama administration has just announced $12 billion in new Federal loan guarantees for renewables businesses. [...] Federal renewable loan guarantee schemes have attracted significant criticism in the past, for example when Solyndra went spectacularly bust in 2012, a bankruptcy which cost US taxpayers $535 million in lost federal loan guarantees.

The Clean Power Plan Will Collide With The Incredibly Weird Physics Of The Electric Grid.  The idiosyncratic physics of electricity will ultimately doom the aspirational goals of the new 1,560 page Clean Power Plan, more than will an army of lobbyists, lawsuits and laborious studies.  It is an inconvenient truth that electricity is profoundly different from every other energy source society uses; it is, in fact, weird.  In energy equivalent terms, the nation's electric utilities deliver five oil supertankers every day.  This feat is performed on a network where operational dynamics and disasters can happen at near lightspeed.  And here is the critical singular fact:  Over 99 percent of all electricity has to be generated at the same instant that it is consumed.  Try doing that with wheat, steel, or oil.  Thus the problem:  The Clean Power Plan (CPP), as by now everyone knows, sets a course to radically increase the use of wind and solar power everywhere in America.  And, cost aside (which it never is in the real world), it should go without saying that neither wind nor solar are available all the time.

India is now home to the world's first airport that runs entirely on solar power.  The facility is now reportedly "absolutely power neutral" – meaning it creates just as much energy as it consumes.  That's a pretty impressive feat when you consider that Cochin International is one of the biggest airports in India, with over 1,500,000 square feet of terminal space alone.  To generate enough juice to run the facility, the airport had to build its own 12 MWp solar power plant onsite, which is comprised of more than 46,000 solar panels splayed across 45 acres of land.  This array is expected to produce somewhere around "50,000 to 60,000 units of electricity each day" – which, on a good day, is just over what the airport consumes during its normal operational functions.

The Editor says...
The location of the airport is 10.1550° N, 76.3910° E, which is just ten degrees north of the equator.  That's where a solar power project has the best chance of success.  In the United States, the same project would be a boondoggle.  The article above says the project is supposed to produce 50,000 "units" of electricity per day.  What units?  Are we too dumb to understand terms like kilowatt-hours?

Shareholders Sue Solar Firm Backed by Billions in U.S. Funds.  A renewable energy company that has received billions in U.S. taxpayer support despite federal investigations and former employees' allegations of illegal business practices is in dire financial straits as shareholders allege securities fraud and investors drive down its stock price.  The Spanish firm Abengoa is facing a federal lawsuit from shareholders who say that the company misled investors about its financial plans.  It has faced numerous lawsuits in the past two years from contractors who say they were stiffed out of millions of dollars in payments.

The Sun in Obama's Eye.  The solar industry is jubilant over President Obama's Clean Power Plan, released in its final form on Monday, August 3.  The same day, however, some other news reminded the public of what happens when government policy mandates and incentivizes a favored energy source:  Taxpayer dollars are gobbled up and investors lose out.

Bill Gates: Cost of switching to renewables is "beyond astronomical".  [Bill] Gates expressed his views in an interview given to the Financial Times yesterday [6/25/2015], saying that the cost of using current renewables such as solar panels and windfarms to produce all or most power would be "beyond astronomical".  At present very little power comes from renewables:  in the UK just 5.2 percent, the majority of which is dubiously-green biofuel burning [...] and even so, energy bills have surged and will surge further as a result.

Obama unveils solar panel plan for low-income homes.  The Obama administration is unveiling a project Tuesday designed to make it easier for residents of low- and moderate-income housing and renters to obtain solar panels for energy production. [...] Part of the administration's climate change strategy, the plan calls for tripling solar energy systems in federally subsidized housing by the year 2020, and making it easier for homeowners to borrow money for solar panels.  No federal cost estimates have been provided.

The Editor says...
This is not a good time to go into debt unless you can't avoid it.  And besides that, Barack H. Obama isn't doing you any favors by making it easier for you to go into debt, to purchase a product that you don't really want, and end up with a power supply system you (probably) aren't capable of managing and maintaining on your own.  For one thing, where are you going to put all the giant batteries and the inverter(s)?  How much is an electrician going to charge for the installation of the hardware you'll need to switch from the inverter back to the utility power?

GAO hits Obama administration on renewable energy projects: audit.  Lawmakers on Wednesday [6/24/2015] demanded accountability from the Bureau of Land Management following an investigation that found the government routinely fails to secure proper bonding from wind and solar project developers, potentially leaving taxpayers on the hook for millions of dollars.  The Government Accountability Office report — which gives more fuel to critics who say President Obama will push "green" power at all costs — also said that the administration has kept shoddy records, may have shredded bond documents and blatantly treats renewable power differently than it treats fossil fuel projects.

Chinese-owned NH solar project costs ratepayers $1.22M.  New Hampshire utility ratepayers will pay a Taiwanese company $1.22 million to build the state's largest solar installation so that a small town can save about $500,000 in power costs over the life of the project.  Taiwan's Walsin Lihwa, parent company of Borrego Solar, will use Chinese-made solar panels in the 3.5-acre project, which is supposed to be finished in July.  It will supply power to several municipal buildings in the area but only some of the time:  the town of Peterborough (population: 6,284) gets only 197 sunny days per year.

Environmentalists Fight Huge Solar Plant On Behalf of 100 Sheep.  The Natural Resources Defense Council said it had "significant concerns" about the project.  So what are we talking about here?  A new CO2-spewing coal plant?  Something that runs on "extraordinarily dirty" oil from the Canadian tar sands?  Nope.  These environmentalist groups are celebrating the likely demise of a solar power plant slated to be built in the Mojave Desert.  Bechtel Corp. says its 350 megawatt Soda Mountain Solar Project would generate enough power to light 170,000 homes in California, and the site chosen is ideal because of its "excellent solar resources, its location in an existing utility corridor and due to the low density of sensitive plant and animal species."

How Much Battery Storage Does a Solar PV System Need?  Even with these rough numbers it's hard to see how anyone living any distance from the Equator is going to be able to justify the cost of installing enough batteries to go off-grid with a domestic rooftop solar PV installation.

Feds pour $32 million more into beleaguered solar industry.  This latest funding is dedicated to training a workforce of solar technicians, developing new technology and implementing a database to share performance data, the DOE announced in a press release last week.  The training goal is 75,000 workers by 2020 and an undisclosed amount of "other professionals" in other fields such as real estate, finance, insurance and fire and safety.  What the release didn't say was that the Obama Administration has spent $150 billion on green initiatives between 2009 and 2014, yet the industry cannot survive without government giveaways, a Brookings Institution study found.

Bees and wind turbines.  The drastic increase in the number of wind farms in the United States began between 2004 and 2005, and has blossomed to cover vast sections of the country today, as seen on the blue map below.  Interesting to note is the time frame of drastic increases of the number of wind farms from 2004 to 2005.  This time frame becomes very important, because it is also the exact time when massive disappearances of honey bees began to be reported, beginning in 2005, with drastic increases in the years to follow.  The next map shows the states where the most losses of honeybees have occurred.  The orange [map] below is also an interesting map, because if you didn't know better, you would believe it is another wind farm map.  Although the southeast area of the United States, such as Florida does not have large numbers of operating wind farms, the honeybee disappearances in that area are attributed to weather events.

California PUC concludes that Solar & Wind costs are extravagant.  The Sierra Club is upset because the California Public Utilities Commission (PUC) built a sophisticated and unbiased computer model to analyze the cost-effectiveness of new solar policy proposals.  But despite all the Sierra Club's political clout, the computer model determined [...] that none of the solar policy proposals are cost effective.  After years of paying about a $200 premium to buy any and all excess electrical power streaming from home and commercial building rooftop solar panels, California is supposed to be moving to "market-based solutions" for energy production.

Germany's Green-Power Program Crushes the Poor.  [Scroll down]  However, what Friedman, Obama, and other admirers of the German green-energy strategy fail to say is that it has come at the expense of sky-high electricity rates.  According to EU data, Germany's average residential electricity rate is 29.8 cents per kilowatt hour.  This is approximately double the 14.2 cents and 15.9 cents per kWh paid by residents of Germany's neighbors Poland and France, respectively, and almost two and a half times the U.S. average of 12 cents per kWh.  Germany's industrial electricity rate of 16 cents per kWh is also much higher than France's 9.6 cents or Poland's 8.3 cents.

Transmission planning: wind and solar.  On the grid power does not flow downhill, take the shortest path or move from areas of high to low pressure.  The grid cannot be well understood as a highway system or a set of pipelines.  Energy simultaneously takes every possible interconnected path from source to destination.  For the most part in normal operating ranges the flows between a generation addition and a new load are unaffected by the flows that are already on the lines.  Energy flows on every possible interconnected path based on the inverse ratio of that path's impedance (resistance).

Why SolarCity's university solar projects cost Oregon taxpayers $12 million.  The massive solar array glinting on a sun-baked hillside behind the Oregon Institute of Technology's Klamath Falls campus isn't made of precious metals.  But for what it cost Oregon taxpayers, it might as well have been.  The developer, SolarCity Corp., reported to the state that the Oregon Tech array was worth $10.3 million.  That's extraordinarily expensive compared to other projects — either in Oregon or nationally.  And for every dollar, Oregon taxpayers are covering half the cost through business energy tax credits given to SolarCity and its investors.

California Solar Farm Killed 3,500 Birds.  Ivanpah is a $2.2 billion dollar solar energy projected aimed at powering up to 140,000 homes for twice the electrical cost.  It also killed 3,500 birds in the first year of its operation.

Third-Party Solar Sales: Free Market Not.  If an industry requires government coercion to sell its product, it is not a free-market industry.  This is the case with third-party sales of roof-top solar-generated electricity where the building is otherwise on the utility grid.

Renewable and Sustainable Crony Capitalism.  Renewable power has serious problems, apart from costing too much.  Wind doesn't work if there is no wind and solar doesn't work at night.  The proprietors of solar and wind expect the electrical grids to accept and pay for all the power they can provide, whenever they provide it.  If a cloud drifts in front of the sun, and the power output suddenly stops, the grid is expected to handle the problem and make up the missing power on a moment's notice.  This is just the opposite of the way that the operators of the electrical grids usually deal with power plants.

Obama-backed green energy failures leave taxpayers with $2.2 billion tab.  Taxpayers are on the hook for more than $2.2 billion in expected costs from the federal government's energy loan guarantee programs, according to a new audit Monday [4/27/2015] that suggests the controversial projects may not pay for themselves, as officials had promised.  Nearly $1 billion in loans have already defaulted under the Energy Department program, which included the infamous Solyndra stimulus project and dozens of other green technology programs the Obama administration has approved, totaling nearly about $30 billion in taxpayer backing, the Government Accountability Office reported in its audit.

Solar Power Lobbyists Seek to Subvert Florida Tea Party.  The solar power lobby is not supporting system-wide deregulation.  It is merely seeking its own carve-out within the utility monopoly system.  Once it gets its carve-out, solar lobbyists will surely fight tooth-and-nail against any other energy sources or providers getting the same special benefits.  This has been the case in California, for example, where the solar power industry has fought against allowing the wind power industry to obtain tax breaks similar to those enjoyed by solar businesses.

Solar Power Propaganda vs. the Real World.  When a former "senior communications official at the White House" writes a blog post for U.S. News and World Report, you should be able to trust it.  But when the author states that the Keystone pipeline would create only 19 weeks of temporary jobs, everything else he says must be suspect — including the claim that our "energy infrastructure will be 100 percent solar by 2030."  Both a union representative and one from TransCanada — the company behind the Keystone pipeline — affirmed that the 19-week timeframe was total fantasy.

When solar panels become a headache.  Some would-be [home] buyers balk when they learn that they'll need to qualify on credit to take over your solar lease payments for the next 15 to 17 years.  Others say they like the house but won't sign a contract unless you buy out the remaining lease payment stream — $15,000 or $20,000 or more — because they're worried that the solar equipment will become obsolete or won't save as much on electricity bills as advertised.  Issues like these are popping up increasingly in California and other states and are interfering in sales and closings, according to real estate industry experts.

Renewable Energy: The Most Expensive Policy Disaster in Modern British History.  Highly subsidised wind and solar capacity flooding the market with near random amounts of zero marginal cost electricity wrecks the economics of conventional power stations.  It is therefore impossible to integrate large amounts of intermittent renewables into a private sector system and still expect it to function as such.

Green Cronyism Hasn't Gone Anywhere.  Back in the good old days of the Obama stimulus, green energy companies were looking for a boost direct from the federal government, in the form of straight-up financial subsidies to promote "green-collar jobs."  Fast forward to 2015, and the terrain has changed some.  We've seen that the stimulus was a bust.  There was the Solyndra mess.  Candidates less willing to hand out federal cash to green energy companies were overwhelmingly elected in 2014.  But one type of green energy has a new plan to get you to stimulate its producers:  Solar.

Surprised solar customers find themselves with liens.  Jeff Leeds says installing SolarCity's panels on the roof of his home in the Northern California city of El Granada was the sorriest day of his life.  Agreeing to the company's 20-year lease was like partnering with the devil, he claims.  He says he has endured skyrocketing electric bills, installation of an inferior system and contract violations because SolarCity refuses to clean the panels or to provide a payment for his system's poor performance.  The latest surprise:  a notice from his bank telling him that SolarCity had placed a lien on his home, and that his equity line of credit application could not proceed until the lien was removed.

Even With Subsidies, Green Energy's Future Is Dim.  It's a lot easier to throw money at wind and solar projects than it is to get energy out of them.  That, at least, is the conclusion one could draw from the Energy Information Administration's latest Annual Energy Outlook, released this week.

Environmentalism and Envy.  In 1856, Nongqawuse, a teenager of the Xhosa tribe in South Africa, prophesied that if the tribe killed their cattle and destroyed their crops the British would be swept away.  The tribe did this and most of them starved to death.  Now we have prophets demanding that we destroy our fossil fuel infrastructure and replace it with windmills and solar power stations.  If we actually did this, the economic consequences would be very costly.  Solar and wind power, on a national scale, would cost 5 or 10 times more than our current sources of power and be less reliable.  This easily discovered fact is rarely discussed by environmental romantics, much less by the crony capitalists of the alternative energy industry, basking in a flood of subsidies and mandates.

Behold, The Racket.  It was reportedly Eric Hoffer who offered the famous, entertaining political assessment that "Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket."  Hoffer's observation has been borne out on a consistent basis, and examples proving it are legion.  The most recent comes courtesy of a Tea Party leader from the Atlanta suburbs named Debbie Dooley, who is now traveling the South shilling for solar energy as part of the Sierra Club-funded Green Tea Coalition.  Dooley has set up shop in Louisiana of late, attempting to save the doomed state tax credits for solar energy that a recent study calculates is costing Louisiana taxpayers a net $63 million per year — making those tax breaks a certified goner amid a budget deficit of some $1.6 billion thanks in large part to depressed prices of oil and gas.

Pres. Obama announces solar program to employ veterans.  Standing next to an array of solar panels at Hill Air Force Base, President Barack Obama announced Friday [4/3/2015] the base will participate in a new program aimed at employing veterans in the solar energy industry.  The Solar Ready Vets is part of the administration's overall goal of employing 75,000 people around the country in the solar energy industry by 2020. HAFB will join four other military installations already participating in a pilot program.

Obama Announces Plan to Train 75,000 Solar Workers.  The White House has announced a goal to train 75,000 workers in the solar industry by 2020, many of them veterans.  "These are good-paying jobs that are helping folks enter the middle-class," President Barack Obama said on Friday [4/3/2015] at Hill Air Force Base in Utah.  The plan will expand on the Department of Energy SunShot Initiative's Solar Instructor Training Network currently running at more than 400 community colleges.

Solar buffs seek favors in power plan.  [Scroll down]  The problem lurks no deeper than the first sentence:  "It shall be the policy of the state to encourage and promote ... " Stop. Right. There.  Nothing that follows matters.  Once it becomes the state's constitutional obligation to "encourage and promote" anything, goodies must flow.  As Tampa's Larry Thornberry wrote for tThe American Spectator, "Any grant writer who couldn't drive subsidies through this language should probably consider legitimate work.  "Any legislator who couldn't liberate tax dollars for a connected friend on the basis of this language is either inept or too honest for the room."

A Test Of Nevada's Solar Tower Project Torched Over A Hundred Birds.  In what's turning into a public relations headache for the solar industry, news has emerged that a recent test of the 110-megawatt Crescent Dunes Solar Energy Project in Nevada resulted in some 130 birds catching fire, when they flew into an area of highly concentrated solar energy.  As KCET's Rewire is reporting, the incident happened last month, but the news is only emerging now.

Nevada Solar Plant Not For The Birds.  If as many birds being burned by solar power farms built in the U.S. were to wash up on our beaches soaked in crude oil from a leaking offshore well, the outrage would be deafening.  But as with the wind turbines that now cover acre upon acre of former "pristine" countryside, what amount to avian Cuisinarts slicing and dicing everything that flies, including endangered species, only the crickets are chirping.

Three counties hope to salvage $88M solar project by borrowing more money, officials say.  Three counties have a solution to salvage an $88-million-dollar solar project that went bust:  borrow more millions to pump into the project and hope it will eventually turn a profit and ease the pain to taxpayers, officials said.  Some officials view the solution as damage control.  Others are calling it a repeat of a mistake, one they will fight to avoid.

Ontario's Green Energy Subsidies — some of what we know.  We know industrial wind energy developers were given lucrative 20-year contracts and paid to produce electricity guaranteeing 13.5[¢]/kWh no matter the time of day power was generated.  We know that industrial wind energy developers were given 20-year contracts that included a cost of living benefit up to 20%.  We know industrial solar under the feed-in-tariff (FIT) program paid contracted parties, e.g., IKEA, the Township of Markham, etc., over 70 cents/kWh for generation, while those same companies/municipalities purchased power for their use at the same rate as the rest of us.  We ordinary customers pick up the tab for the difference.  We know that the Office of the Auditor General (AG) on two different occasions clearly noted the Ontario government failed to conduct a cost/benefit analysis for just about everything associated with the Ministry of Energy's portfolio.  We know "smart meters" cost us about $2 billion but failed to produce any meaningful benefit other than allowing local distribution companies to bill us on a time-of-use basis.  We know energy costs have doubled since 2003.

Political, Scientific Chicanery Underlies Global Warming Alarmism.  In her December 28 CNN article, "How Germany Banishes Climate Myths," German environment minister Barbara Hendricks argues that the climate policies enabled by her country and the EU as a whole have been an economic success.  This is nothing more than East German-style disinformation.  The reality is that Germany's so-called "Solar Valley" has become a mothballed industrial rust belt.  Nearly all solar energy manufacturers have closed their doors. [...] Hendricks' CNN article is just another example of the use of fraudulent PR spin to promote a desired political message while ignoring the realities of science and economics.

Wind & Solar are 16x more expensive than gas.  The diagrams below show the cost and capacity factors of the major European renewable energy power sources: onshore and offshore wind farms and large scale photovoltaic solar generation.  They are compared to the cost and output capacity of conventional gas fired electricity generation.

Despite $39B in Annual Gov't. Subsidies, Solar Produced 0.5% of Electricity in US.  Despite receiving an estimated $39 billion in annual government subsidies over the past five years, the solar energy industry accounted for just one half of one percent (0.5%) of all the electricity generated in the U.S. during the first 10 months of 2014, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA).  Between January and October of last year, the U.S. produced a total of 3,431,473 million kilowatt hours (kWh) of electricity.  But only 15,973 million kWh were generated by solar thermal or photovoltaic (PV) solar modules that use semiconducting materials to convert sunlight into electricity, according to EIA's latest Monthly Energy Review.

No rival for the lightning bug.  By 2012, 20 different agencies allocated money to 345 solar energy initiatives, supporting more than 1,500 projects.  State and local governments joined in the parade, with subsidies and tax breaks to finance the latest big thing. [...] Federal, state and local programs have been established to install solar-powered water heaters and rooftop solar panels, in turn intended to encourage production of solar electricity.  In fact, a growing number of these subsidized solar projects are expensive boondoggles.  Solyndra is the most infamous of these.  The California solar cell company went bankrupt not long after it received a $535 million taxpayer-guaranteed loan.  More than a thousand workers lost their jobs and taxpayers were out a half-billion dollars.

Taxpayers in 3 counties could be on the hook for millions after solar project fizzles.  The concept behind the massive solar project sounded simple enough:  borrow $88 million to install panels on public buildings in Morris, Somerset and Sussex counties and then sell excess electricity, using the revenues to pay off the debt.  The concept was called the "Morris model," held up nationally as an example of how to produce renewable energy through public-private partnerships.  It was the second project of its kind and the previous one was hailed as a success.  But now, nearly four years later, taxpayers could be on the hook for tens of millions of dollars the counties owe bondholders, after work ground to a halt amidst cost overruns and lawsuits.

Congressmen Put Heat on 'Deceptive' Rooftop Solar Leases.  A different sort of green energy issue has sparked bipartisan action on Capitol Hill as lawmakers move to address allegations of deceptive practices in sales of rooftop solar panels.  Earlier this month, 12 Republican members of the House of Representatives wrote to the Federal Trade Commission, warning that leasing solar panels from a third party may be a harmful investment for homeowners.

All megawatts are not equal.  [D]iffering types of generating resources bring diverse sets of costs and benefits to the power system so that they cannot be compared solely based on a cost per Megawatt (MW) produced basis.  As this post will conclude, it matters very much when energy is generated, where the energy comes from and how well it works to support the system.  For large scale bulk projects, the average cost of solar and wind will need to be significantly below the average cost of conventional generation well before wind and solar can begin to approach general competitiveness on a cost basis.

Huge solar plant lags in early production.  The largest solar power plant of its type in the world — once promoted as a turning point in green energy — isn't producing as much energy as planned.

'Green' Lobby Pushes to Extend Lucrative Tax Breaks.  As the lame-duck Congress limps to the finish line, billions of dollars in dubious federal energy subsidies remain in limbo.  The perennial procrastination has solar- and wind-power lobbyists scrambling for renewal of their industries' expiring tax credits.

Where's the Xunlight? A Real-Life Parable For the Obama Years.  The recent Chapter 7 bankruptcy and liquidation filing of the Toledo, Ohio-based solar-panel manufacturer Xunlight Corp. has attracted barely any national attention.  Maybe it's gotten to the point — after Solyndra, Evergreen, Abound, and Satcon — that the failure of another government-backed alternative energy company is a dog-bites man story.  It'd be newsworthy if any of them actually ever succeeded.

Renewable Energy: So Useless That Even Greenie Google Gave up on it.  Some people call it "renewable energy" but I prefer to call it "alternative energy" because that's what it really is:  an alternative to energy that actually works (eg nuclear and anything made from wonderful, energy-rich fossil fuel.)  Now a pair of top boffins from uber-green Google's research department have reached the same conclusion. [...] In a nutshell, renewable energy is rubbish because so much equipment is needed to make it work — steel, concrete, copper, glass, carbon fibre, neodymium, shipping and haulage — that it very likely uses up more energy than it actually produces.  Yet our political class remains committed to the fantasy that the emperor's green clothes are perfectly magnificent.

Lower Oil Prices Slow Fracking, but Kill Solar.  Environmentalists should be ecstatic. The Saudis are doing for them what they have tried and tried and tried to do for themselves, but could not:  Stop fracking.  But their green smiles are quickly turning into frowns as more and more enviros recognize the same lower oil prices that hurt fracking are killing their most treasured darlings:  Solar and wind power.

Chutzpah and Soviet agriculture: An update on the Ivanpah solar power monstrosity.  The Ivanpah solar plant has produced about one-quarter the energy promised.  Now the owners of the project have applied for a half-billion-dollar grant to pay off a large portion of its original federally guaranteed loan.

MN wind and solar mandate would mean costly grid upgrade.  [Scroll down]  A search of the 178-page report shows the authors never mention ratepayers, leaving unanswered whether spending nearly $400 million to upgrade the grid would be a good investment for Minnesota consumers and employers.  "It doesn't say it would be cost effective to upgrade the system to accommodate 40 percent renewables.  It doesn't say it would be a good idea," said Bill Glahn, an independent energy analyst for Piedmont Consulting and a former Pawlenty administration energy official.  "It just said that given enough time and money, it's technically feasible.  I could have told you that."

World's largest solar plant applying for federal grant to pay off federal loan.  After already receiving a controversial $1.6 billion construction loan from U.S. taxpayers, the wealthy investors of a California solar power plant now want a $539 million federal grant to pay off their federal loan. [...] The Ivanpah solar electric generating plant is owned by Google and renewable energy giant NRG, which are responsible for paying off their federal loan.

The Editor says...
It will be interesting to see where the left-wing anti-capitalist troublemakers stand on this issue.  Many of those who who tout solar panels as a "clean" energy source are the same people who rail against "Wall Street" — by which they mean successful and profitable businesses with plenty of available cash, of which Google is a prime example.  Where are the "corporate social responsibility" people now?

Tampa Solar Panels Fail to Meet Promises.  Rooftop solar panels installed at the Hillsborough County Courthouse in Tampa, Florida are producing less than half their promised power, county records reveal.  Rather than lowering electricity costs, as promised, the poor-performing solar panels are causing a dramatic increase in electricity costs.

Ron Klain and Solyndra.  Ron Klain is a sharp-elbowed Democratic political operative with no medical expertise.  Tapping him as "Ebola czar" may not be the president's best move when, as it is, no one can believe a word the Obama administration says.  And that's not just because Mr. Klain is yet another lobbyist recruited despite Mr. Obama's vow that his administration would shun lobbyists.  Klain was also a central player in the president's Solyndra fraud, which soaked taxpayers for over half a billion dollars for the benefit of Obama cronies.

Law Would Mandate Solar Panels on All S.F. Building Rooftops.  A new resolution to be introduced next week in San Francisco would require the owners of most new apartment buildings in the city to install solar panels or gardens on the buildings' rooftops.  According to the San Francisco Chronicle, city Board of Supervisors President David Chiu will introduce the Solar Vision 2020 resolution next week, a resolution that would apply to both commercial and residential buildings.

Obama misleads students about climate and energy.  The International Renewable Energy Agency reports that worldwide investment in renewables (not counting large hydropower) amounted to an incredible $214 billion in 2013 alone!  IRENA insists that these expenditures need to more than double by 2030, to achieve the impossible goal of restricting average global temperature rise to 2 degrees Celsius by the end of the century.  However, results to date show that those investments have brought few benefits, and much harm.  European studies have found that expensive, unreliable wind and solar power kills two to four jobs for each "renewable" energy job this heavily subsidized industry creates.

Hagan Passed North Carolina Law that Aided Family's Solar Company.  Sen. Kay Hagan (D., N.C.) fought for the passage of legislation in both the state General Assembly and the United States Congress that has financially benefitted her relatives.  As a member of North Carolina's General Assembly in 2007, Hagan helped pass legislation that required all investor-owned utilities in the state to utilize renewable energy resources for 12.5 percent of their energy needs.  Hagan used her work to pass the law as proof of commitment to renewable energy such as solar panels

How State Solar Policies Hurt America's Poor.  State renewable-energy policies, such as those encouraging solar use, are creating a kind of "energy inequality", one that benefits wealthier Americans at the expense of the poor.  While solar power itself may be a good thing, government-sponsored sweetheart deals for the solar industry — like "net-metering," for example — are increasing energy costs for low-income households across America.  In seeking to encourage solar usage, 44 states have enacted net-metering policies, which allow customers with solar panels to sell the power they generate back to their electric utility providers.  The hope is that net-metering will encourage more customers to use solar panels to reduce their overall utility costs.  It sounds simple — but there is more to these innocuously-named mandates than meets the eye.  Those most likely to benefit from net-metering are high-income homeowners able to afford expensive solar panels.  Meanwhile, low-income Americans are absorbing the costs.

Hagan's Husband Used Stimulus Money To Hire His Own Company.  Sen. Kay Hagan's husband and son created a solar energy contracting company in August 2010, and then, using $250,644 in federal stimulus grant funds, her husband hired that same company to install solar panels at a building he owns.  Public records show that Green State Power was formed seven weeks before JDC Manufacturing — a company owned in part by Greensboro attorney Charles "Chip" Hagan III, Sen. Hagan's husband — received the stimulus grant for the solar project at a 300,000-square-foot facility in Reidsville, N.C.

How Green Is Europe?  "Germany produces half of energy with solar."  That was the recent headline on a German website of news in English, and it would have duly impressed anybody whose understanding of energy matters extends to just such headlines.  But the headline, totally wrong, was also a perfect example of why it is so important to deconstruct the reports about green Europe.

Solar and wind power costs are huge compared to natural gas fired generation.  Ed Hoskins has done an analysis of cost ratios, and no matter what your viewpoint of economics might be, the numbers here don't lie.  Without being propped up by subsidies, solar and wind aren't even in the race as their competitiveness leaves them at the starting line while cheap natural gas (aided by fracking) runs laps around the race course.

Earth-Friendly Energy is Anything But.  Environmentalists worship solar energy and wind power as Earth-friendly answers to their ecological prayers.  Tortoises, bats, butterflies, and bald eagles beg to differ.  Perhaps because solar panels and industrial wind farms lack emissions, they seem "clean."  Despite their pristine appearance, however, these "green" electricity sources hammer Mother Nature — often fatally.

Lawmaker slams state for SolarCity subsidy, citing federal probe.  A Republican Assemblyman from Dutchess County is criticizing the Cuomo administration's $750 million subsidy for a new solar panel factory in Buffalo, citing a two-year-old federal probe into whether SolarCity and other residential solar installers inflated the cost of their work so they would receive bigger federal subsidies than they deserved.

A Government-subsidized Desert Death Ray.  The Ivanpah solar generating plant is located in California about 50 miles from Las Vegas near the California-Nevada border.  173,000 mirrors are used to concentrate the sun on 3 boiler-towers where water is turned into steam to drive turbines and generate electricity.  The mirrors track the sun and concentrate sunlight so that the intensity of light falling on the boiler-towers is about 500 times stronger than sunlight — a death ray.  If a person were to be illuminated by this death ray, 3rd degree burns would follow within a few seconds.  Insects that wander into the kill zone are quickly vaporized.  Birds are severely burned or killed depending on how long they are in the kill zone.

Why Renewable Energy is Hopeless.  Wind and solar power are industries that are destined to remain in their infancy, if not forever, then certainly for the indefinite future.

EU to ban high-energy hair dryers, smartphones and kettles.  The European Union is considering pulling the plug on high-wattage hair dryers, lawn mowers and electric kettles in a follow up to its controversial ban on powerful vacuum cleaners.  The power of hairdryers could be reduced by as much as 30 percent in order to be more eco-friendly, a draft study commissioned by Brussels suggests, threatening many of the models favoured by hairdressers and consumers for speedy blow-dries. [...] Current EU legislation covers televisions, washing machines, refrigerators and vacuum cleaners but not most smaller electrical appliances.

The Editor says...
Dear European friends:  If you don't have enough electricity to go around, the solution is to generate more of it, which in your case means abandoning your attachment to solar panels and windmills.

Emerging Solar Plants Scorch Birds in Mid-Air.  Workers at a state-of-the-art solar plant in the Mojave Desert have a name for birds that fly through the plant's concentrated sun rays — "streamers," for the smoke plume that comes from birds that ignite in midair.

How to cut emissions, and how not to.  The world's efforts to cut greenhouse gas emissions began with the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in 1992, were formalized in the Kyoto Protocol in 1997 and have since mutated into the hundreds of "XX percent of renewables by 20YY" targets adopted by groups of countries, individual countries and regional jurisdictions.  They have spawned, among other things, innumerable bureaucracies, countless climate conferences, forests of wind turbines, patchwork quilts of solar panels and a billion-dollar-a-day climate change industry.  And they haven't worked [at all].

Horrifying bird slaughter at solar power plant.  A solar power plant partly owned by Google is incinerating one flying bird every 2 minutes, igniting the poor creatures as they fly past the concentrated beams of light from focused mirror arrays.  The phony scare over CO2 purportedly causing global warming has motivated investment in this lethal scheme that is damaging the ecosystem around the Bright Source Energy plant at Ivanpah, on the California-Nevada border.

Florida Solar Panels Producing Less than Half of Promised Power.  In 2010, federal and Hillsborough County officials announced the project to place solar panels on the Hillsborough County Courthouse. Government officials said the solar panels, costing $1.2 million, would pay for themselves in electricity cost savings.  Officials claimed the panels would provide at least 40 percent of the building's electricity needs and save more than $60,000 per year in electricity costs.  Hillsborough County maintains a website where people can view the real-time solar energy produced by the panels, as well as an ongoing tally of the panels' lifetime electricity production.  According to the website, the solar panels are producing less than half their promised electricity and are reducing the courthouse's electricity bill by only $27,000 per year.  WFTS News in Tampa obtained copies of the courthouse's electricity bills and confirmed the savings are no more than about $2,000 per month.  WFTS also confirmed the panels are reducing electricity bills by only 15 to 18 percent, rather than the promised 40 percent.

Intermittent Renewables and Electricity Markets.  Renewable energy advocates regularly ignore the intermittency of solar and wind energy in their analyses.  As discussed in a previous article, this is a very serious omission because the mechanisms required to compensate for intermittency can increase the cost of solar and wind energy many-fold, especially at higher penetration levels.  The fact that wind energy still requires generous subsidies after having reached grid-parity with conventional power is a very direct real-world example of the added costs of intermittency even at low penetration levels.

Most solar panels are facing the wrong direction, say scientists.  Thousands of people have spent vast sums of money installing eco-friendly solar panels but most will have probably had them fitted facing the wrong way, according to energy experts.  The solar power industry is being urged to reconsider its approach to installing panels after one of the UK's leading experts, Professor Ralph Gottshalg of Loughborough University says too many solar panels are facing in the wrong direction.

Things Obama Just Won't Do.  When first in office, Obama offered his "economic stimulus" plan.  Hundreds of billions of dollars would be funneled into "shovel ready" projects after first being taxed away from the American people. [...] His program didn't stimulate the economy.  Large parts of the money were spent on Obama's pals and pet issues.  Remember Solyndra, which had over $500 million in federally guaranteed loans supposedly going to "invest" in alternatives to global warming?  It didn't stimulate anything.  It just filled the pockets of some of the president's pals before the company went bankrupt.  Obama wanted an issue, not a solution.  He got it.

Wind Industry Attacks California Solar Subsidies.  The California Wind Energy Association and other renewable energy groups criticized a new law extending special tax breaks to the California solar power industry.  Wind power, biomass, and geothermal power groups say the special benefits for solar power tilt the playing field against other renewable power options.  Senate Bill 871, signed by Gov. Jerry Brown on June 20, extends until 2025 an exemption for solar power systems from state property taxes.  The existing exemption was not scheduled to expire until 2017, but the legislature rushed the new exemption into law at the end of the session with almost no advance notice or opportunity for debate.

Five Fatal Flaws of Solar Energy.  Firstly, sunshine at any spot is always intermittent and often unreliable.  Solar panels can deliver significant energy only from 9am to 3pm — a maximum of 25% of each day.  Solar can often help supply the hot afternoon demand for air conditioning, but demand for electricity generally peaks at about 6:30pm, when production from solar is usually zero.  Secondly, to be a standalone energy supplier, PV solar needs batteries to cover those times when solar is not producing — about 75% of the time under ideal cloudless skies.  To charge the batteries for continuous power, while also supplying usable power, a solar plant can deliver a theoretical maximum of only 25% of its daytime capacity.

Solar panel company pocketing govt subsidy cash intended for homeowners.  The idea behind this was that if homeowners wanted to save some money on their energy bill by using solar power, they could receive a 30% subsidy to help cover the costs.  Sounds pretty sweet, eh?  Well, when the government is giving away taxpayer cash, plenty of people will line up to get it... and it's not always those who were intended to benefit.

Solar-panel maker shuts down.  A Toledo solar-panel manufacturer has shut down and dozens of employees are out of work.  Xunlight Corp., a flexible solar-panel manufacturer that uses technology developed at the University of Toledo and is based on Nebraska Avenue, closed its doors June 30 to "resolve some matters," CEO John Buckey said.  Mr. Buckey declined to elaborate on the cause of the shutdown, but a letter provided to The Blade that appears to have been sent by Mr. Buckey to employees on July 2 said the company is closing and makes no reference to any potential reopening.

Solar (and Wind): Green for the Air, Filthy for the Grid.  Barclays Investment Bank Research recently downgraded the entire U.S. electric utility sector because they believe that "a confluence of declining cost trends in distributed solar photovoltaic (PV) power generation and residential-scale power storage is likely to disrupt the status quo" for energy generation in America.  The electrons generated by residential PV solar systems are "green," but the electric current they send to the utility grid is referred to in the industry as "filthy," since it is inherently variable, intermittent, and unreliable.

As Veterans Waited For Treatment, VA Hospitals Spent $420 Million On Solar Panels.  If you thought the fiasco engulfing Veterans Affairs (VA) couldn't get any worse, you were wrong.  It seems that VA hospitals spent around $420 million dollars on solar panels and windmills, while veterans languished on appointment waiting lists.  Some have died as a result.

BLM's Nevada Cattle Stance Linked to Solar Plans.  Environmental mitigation necessary for a planned solar power project may have motivated the federal Bureau of Land Management's decision to launch a military-style armed enforcement action against a Nevada cattle rancher, government documents reveal.  According to the documents, BLM determined continued cattle grazing would interfere with the bureau's plans to use the land as an environmental mitigation area for desert tortoise disruption caused by the solar facility.

Renewable Electricity: a Technological Rip-Off, and an Environmental Loser.  In California, electricity sales were $35 billion in 2012.  The average retail price of electricity in California is around 14 cents per kilowatt-hour.  This compares to about 8 cents in states that have not found the renewable energy religion.  The differential gives the California renewable energy mafia about $15 billion a year with which to reward its friends and supporters.  That's just for the electricity sector.

Energy CEO says Obama is destroying low-cost energy with EPA.  Murray Energy CEO Robert Murray says he is scared to death for this country, for poor people, those who live on fixed incomes and for people who are retiring.  Murray says Obama is illegally using the EPA and the Clean Air Act to take over the US Electric Power Grid and in the process he's destroying low-cost energy.  Murray points out that coal is only 4 cents per kilowatt-hour and Obama wants to replace it with renewable energy sources, wind and solar, that cost 22 cents per kilowatt-hour.

Why Solar Power is Permanently Inefficient.  The solar collecting area on the roof of a house may be enough to heat or perhaps cool a house, but residential heating is only about 13 percent of US energy consumption.  And the payback time, verified more recently by Dr. Arthur B. Robinson, and others, does not equal the expected life of solar residential heating systems.

The accepted killing and maiming of animals in the name of Green energy.  Liberals love solar and wind energy as long as the solar panels, which need considerable acreage to install and plenty of sun year around, are installed on someone else's property.  But no progressive would agree to have the ugly, unsightly, and noisy wind mills installed in their own back yards because they would be destroying their vineyards' and horse-riding pastures' "view shed."  Aside from frying birds that happen to wonder in the heat flux of the solar panels, or are attracted by the reflecting panels that look like water, or chopped by the rotating blades of the turbines, wind mills are damaging to animal and human health.

Energy Sources, Costs and Global Warming.  Last month the Wall Street Journal (8/18/12) published a breakdown of federal subsidies for electric power production, citing the U.S. Dept. of Energy and the Institute for Energy Research as sources.  Here is the comparison of subsidy costs per megawatt hour:

  Fuel Type              $ Subsidy per megawatt hour
  Oil and Gas            $0.64
  Coal                    0.64
  Hydropower              0.82
  Nuclear                 3.14
  Wind                   56.29
  Solar                 775.64

Study: Renewable Energy Poses Security Risk.  Intermittent and unreliable wind and solar power pose a serious energy security risk and threaten to undermine the reliability of energy generation in the UK, according to a new report. [...] Last December, wind and solar power generation almost came to a complete halt for a week.  Germany's 23,000 wind turbines were largely still, while photovoltaic failed to generate enough energy due to lack of sunlight.  The result was that for a week, the country's remaining conventional power plants had to take on the burden of providing all the country's energy supplies.  The report's author, Philipp Mueller, said:  "Open energy markets are a much better way to ensure energy security than intermittent generation systems like wind and solar.

California's New Solar Plant Burning Up Taxpayer Money, Land, and Wildlife.  The Ivanpah capital cost is $2.2 billion for 392 megawatts (MW) of gross generation capacity (potential power output per hour).  (That 392 MW is a number not comparable to 392 MW of, say, gas-fired capacity, because of a sharply lower "capacity factor," discussed below.)  Accordingly, the nominal capital cost per kilowatt (kW, one one-thousandth of a MW) of capacity for Ivanpah is about $5600, a figure that ignores some costs that are important but hidden.  In comparison, the Energy Information Administration publishes estimates of the capacity costs per kW for coal, combined-cycle natural gas, nuclear, and on-shore wind capacity:  respectively about $2700, $885, $4800, and $2075.  For solar thermal plants in general, the EIA estimate is about $4750.

Obama donor gained nearly $1 billion in tax credits in Solyndra bankruptcy.  Most people who follow the news are aware that President Obama invested $527 million in Solyndra, the now-bankrupt California-based solar panel manufacturing company.  What is much less well-known is that the federal government was legally required to cut its losses of tax dollars just months into the project, and that only an illegal loan modification made to benefit an Obama fundraiser led to taxpayers losing more than $500 million.  "The true engine of economic growth will always be companies like Solyndra," Obama declared in May 2010, but even then, the company was burning through more than $10 million a month and headed towards bankruptcy.

End to solar farm blight as subsidy scheme to be scrapped.  Subsidies that have driven the spread of large solar farms across Britain are to be scrapped under plans to stop the panels blighting the countryside.  Energy companies that build solar farms currently qualify for generous consumer-funded subsidies through the so-called 'Renewable Obligation' (RO) scheme, and had expected to keep doing so until 2017.  But the Department of Energy and Climate Change announced on Tuesday that it planned to shut the RO to new large solar farms two years early, from April next year.

Obama adds solar panels to White House, pressing his support for green energy.  Citing security and other concerns, the White House won't say how many panels now encase the top of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. or how much they cost.

White House Solar Project Doesn't Stand Up to Light of Day.  Topping off a week of energy and "climate change" initiatives, the Obama administration announced on May 9 that solar panels have been installed on the roof of the White House.  It's part of "a project that President Barack Obama hopes will send a signal that renewable energy is feasible and environmentally shrewd," reported the Associated Press.  "Solar panels at the White House, I think, are a really important message that solar is here, we are doing it, we can do a lot more," Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz said in a White House video.  "I am very bullish on the future of solar energy as a key part of our clean energy future."  The administration claims that the solar panels will generate 6.3 kilowatts of power — but only when the sun is shining, and then only when it is shining at the correct angle.  According to the Daily Caller, this "only happens between 6 and 7 hours of the day."  That means the panels will produce about 44 kilowatt hours of electricity per day.

The Editor takes it a step further...
In the Washington / Baltimore area, the retail price of electricity is 12.9 cents per kilowatt-hour, which means the White House is saving $5.68 per day on electricity.  The White House won't say how much this project cost, claiming it's a security issue.  That is obviously a lie.  The secrecy surrounding the cost of the White House system has nothing to do with security:  The total cost must be really embarrassing, because solar panels won't last forever, and this system can never pay for itself.

German Solar Stutters Once Subsidies Dry Up.  As part of its energiewende, Germany guaranteed solar energy producers long-term above-market rates for their energy contributions.  It worked like gangbusters, transforming Germany into the world's leader in solar energy, but the subsidies necessary to keep the boom going came with heavy costs.  Recently, Berlin has walked back its over-generous feed-in tariffs, as the subsidies are called.  Now, as Reuters reports, new solar installations are plummeting.

Solar panels return to the W.H.  The installation of 6.3 kilowatts' worth of solar capacity fulfills a promise the administration first made in 2010, and complements a host of government and corporate energy initiatives that Obama will unveil in a speech at a Wal-Mart store in Mountain View, California.  Among other things, Obama will finalize several new energy efficiency standards, get hundreds of businesses and organizations to promise to deploy almost a gigawatt of clean energy, and train more workers for the nation's burgeoning solar workforce.  The corporate commitments come from companies like Apple, Google and Yahoo.

NM college spends $5 million on solar array to save $200,000 in utility bills.  Santa Fe Community College has just unveiled a solar array that, it says, will save the college at least $200,000 a year on its utility bills.  But the array, funded by taxpayers in a 2010 bond election, will cost $5 million.  You don't have to be a math major at the college to figure out it would take 25 years of $200,000 cost savings per year to reach the $5 million mark for the project to just break even. 

It Isn't Just the Bundy Ranch.  The Bundy Ranch incident, which threatened to escalate into a shooting war, collapsed when reports surfaced that the ulterior motive behind the attempted BLM takeover was an deal set up by Harry Reid to place solar panels on the land; something from which we can expect he stood to profit handsomely, and very likely under the table.  It appears likely that the reports were correct, or else the standoff would have escalated.  Confronted with the truth, the BLM backed down, but promised that this wasn't the end.  It appears that this may be correct because various western state governments are now convening to take control of the "federal" lands.

Judge Jeanine Links Nevada Land Grab to Solar Energy Plant.  This week, United States Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid continued trashing ordinary Americans over land grabs.  And you need to be concerned because the land grabs haven't ended.  And who knows?  Will your land be next?

Greens Are Reds.  The greens are, in short, against almost all forms of electric power, except those that are prohibitively expensive.  They are against oil, natural gas, coal, nuclear, and hydro, which together account about 90 percent of our electric power production.  They want wind and solar energy, which produce about 3 percent of our electricity and aren't even green.  We'd have to pave over entire states and vast stretches of desert with solar panels to produce enough electricity to power our $18 trillion economy.

Some Lessons from Cliven Bundy.  Removing Cliven Bundy's cattle and killing them was not about "the public good."  It wasn't even really about "protecting the turtles."  Instead, it was about clearing off land so that Chinese land developers in league with Harry Reid's son Rory could use the land as a remediation site connected with a solar power panel farm they wanted to build further north as part of a $5 billion development deal.  In other words, it was about using public land so that the Reid family and foreign developers could make a pile of money — which makes the Senator's complaints about Bundy "profiting off of public lands" just a bit hypocritical.

Oklahoma will charge homeowners who generate their own power.  Under the terms of a recently passed bill, expected to be signed by Governor Mary Fallin, homeowners who install their own private solar or wind turbine energy resources and sell some of the juice back to energy companies will be paying a fee for the privilege.

Death by solar farms: 71 species of birds killed, 'entire food chains' disrupted.  A new report by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service finds that solar facilities in California are acting like "mega traps" that kill and injure birds.  As a result, "entire food chains" are being disrupted.  USFWS's National Fish and Wildlife Forensics Laboratory studied three solar farms in Southern California:  Desert Sunlight, Genesis Solar and Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System (ISEGS).  Two-hundred and thirty-three different birds from 71 species were found over the course of a two-year study.

Reviving The Constitution Part 3: Federal "Property".  Rancher Cliven Bundy's cattle made use of open land claimed by the federal government.  Neither of those things is much out of the ordinary.  Western ranchers have long pastured their animals on "open range."  More, as the feds claim 84% of the land in the state of Nevada, there aren't many options for such a rancher.  But in this case, there were covetous eyes on that pasturage:  a group of Chinese investors who sought to turn it into a solar energy farm.  For them to get their way, Bundy and his cattle had to go.

Solar companies take govt. to court.  Generally, when we hear stories about the federal government ripping off the businessman, we tend to think of tales of tax increases or burdensome regulations.  But a different type of story crosses our desk this weekend, as a solar power consortium — who already received a quarter billion in grants and tax incentives — takes Uncle Sam to the courthouse because they feel they should have gotten millions more.

Report: That new $1.6 billion loan-guaranteed solar farm is basically a "mega-trap" for flying wildlife.  I would merely like to reiterate, once again, that mass bird deaths via solar farm (and don't even get me started on wind farms) might very well be a equitable price to pay if this solar farm was otherwise worth its salt.  Honestly, I could easily forgive the birds deaths if it were serving as a competitive and cost-effective alternative form of energy.  The oil industry, for instance, ends up killing some wildlife in their production processes, too, and plain ol' tall buildings bring down plenty of birds every year — but the problem is that this Ivanpah solar farm is not serving as a competitive and cost-effective alternative form of energy.

Solar-Panel Robotics Startup Gets Government Grant.  A Silicon Valley startup using robots to install solar panels has secured a roughly $1 million grant from the Department of Energy.  Brittmore Group, based in San Jose, Calif., is focused on bringing more automation to the installation of large-scale solar power plants. [...] Robots are used to do the heavy lifting of solar panels, and can shuttle panels to their installation locations at a rate of 10 miles per hour.

A Tale of Two Cities.  The U.S. metro area with the lowest unemployment rate is a shale oil boomtown.  The one with the highest unemployment rate houses the world's largest solar plant.  Energy policy experts are pointing to that dichotomy as evidence that job creation potential in the energy industry lies primarily with fossil fuels, despite the administration's insistence on creating a "clean energy economy."  According to data released on Friday by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), Midland, Texas, has a 2.9 percent unemployment rate, the lowest in the country. [...] In contrast to the successes of those oil and gas boomtowns, Yuma, Ariz., is facing the highest unemployment rate of any U.S. metro area at a whopping 26.1 percent.  Yuma is the site of the Agua Caliente solar plant — the largest photovoltaic solar generation facility in the world.

Blinded by Green Energy.  Many who are blinded by green energy don't know about or simply ignore the heavy reliance on taxpayer subsidies and massive cronyism surrounding it.  But now, in addition to the fiscal impracticality of green energy, we have Bald Eagles being killed by ugly wind turbines and pilots being dangerously disorientated by giant solar plants — and as if the Ivanpah solar plant wasn't causing enough trouble, it's the very same plant that has been conveniently cooking birds before they fall to the ground.  Isn't it interesting how green energy (and those who amass their wealth from it) gets a free pass from any of its negative impacts, unlike the economy-growing affordable energy options?

Pilots complain of being blinded by glare over world's largest solar plant.  The largest solar-panel plant in the world, built near the Mojave desert, has been blamed for blinding pilots flying over the California facility.  The Ivanpah plant, in San Bernardino, uses 173,500 mirrors to reflect sunlight on to boilers, but despite its green credentials it has been criticized as a flying hazard.  Two anonymous complaints were made to the Federal Aviation Administration in August last year, complaining of a 'blinding glare' coming off the plant.

Katrina victims live out Hollywood eco-agenda.  I stopped by the Lower Ninth Ward to see how rebuilding efforts are faring nearly nine years after Hurricane Katrina.  I visited one particular spot — the area where in August 2005 a flood wall holding the waters of the Industrial Canal broke, setting off a calamity that continues to this day.  The destruction was total; the rebuilding is at best partial.  The first thing one notices today is that solar energy panels seem to outnumber people in this particular stretch of the Lower Ninth.

Washington State Senate Reexamines Solar Power Incentives.  The Washington Senate Energy, Environment & Telecommunications Committee held a January 30 session to examine federal, state, and local incentives given to the solar power industry.  James M. Taylor [...] noted jobs created in the solar power industry by government subsidies or market share carve-outs are not jobs created at all.  Instead, he noted, they are merely jobs shifted away from the conventional power sector, where the workers would be producing more-affordable electricity that leaves more money in people's pockets to purchase goods and services across the entire economy and produce additional jobs there.

Pikes, Pickets, and Scams.  Whenever the proponents of green energy argue for more money for these failed projects, they assert that the life of every bird, bee, snail, and minnow is precious and that green energy will save what nasty fossil fuels endanger.  We've already seen how the strict rules about killing endangered birds are waived when it comes to avian pâté-making windmills, now it appears that the huge Ivanpah Solar plant interferes with both aviation and bird life, but who's complaining?

Solar Plants May Make Deserts Too Hot For Tortoises.  We've paid plenty of attention here at KCET to the problems caused for desert tortoises when their habitat is replaced with renewable energy facilities.  But now one scientist is saying that big solar facilities in the Mojave could seal the desert tortoise's fate in a way you might not expect.  According to Barry Sinervo, an evolutionary biologist at the University of California Santa Cruz, current solar projects in the California desert intended to slow global warming, including two approved just last week by the Interior Department, could actually make the desert too hot for tortoises to survive past the end of the century.

The Dark Side Of Solar Power.  One of the inconvenient truths that global warming fanatics and renewable energy purists try to ignore is that wind and solar energy are not so environmentally friendly.  At least, not if you care about wildlife and land preservation.  First, these energy sources are massive land hogs.  Ivanpah requires more than 5 square miles of mirrors to produce enough electricity to light 140,000 homes.  It would take roughly 3,600 Ivanpahs to supply all the country's electricity needs, with mirrors covering New Jersey, Connecticut, Delaware, Rhode Island and a chunk of Massachusetts combined.  Wind power is hardly much better.  According to the Nature Conservancy, it takes 30 times the land for windmills to produce as much electricity as a nuclear power plant.  And their turbines amount to bird Cuisinarts.  To keep wind farms spinning, the Obama administration recently issued permits letting them kill protected bald and golden eagles for 30 years, provided they take some steps to mitigate the slaughter.

The Editor says...
If I had written that article, I would have mentioned, in very fine print, that Cuisinart® is a registered trademark of Cuisinart.

Extreme winter weather affecting some solar panels' energy output, maintenance, officials said.  For the countless solar panels that have cropped up on rooftops and fields across the region, winters like this one can reduce solar output when the panels become covered with snow or clouds filter the sunlight.  Overall, PSE&G's solar production has dropped this winter as the state has been hit hard by snowstorm after snowstorm, said Todd Hranicka, director of solar energy, although he had no specific figures.  "It's one of the challenges of solar," he said.  "If the sunlight is not hitting the solar panel, you're not generating energy."

The $2.2 Billion Bird-Scorching Solar Project.  A giant solar-power project officially opening this week in the California desert is the first of its kind, and may be among the last, in part because of growing evidence that the technology it uses is killing birds.  U.S. Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz is scheduled to speak Thursday [2/13/2014] at an opening ceremony for the Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating Station, which received a $1.6 billion federal loan guarantee.

World's largest solar plant scorching birds in Nevada desert.  A stretch of the Mojave Desert has been transformed by hundreds of thousands of mirrors into the largest solar power plant of its type in the world, but the milestone is being met with criticism from environmental groups concerned about the effect of solar energy on desert wildlife.  The Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System, sprawling across roughly 5 square miles of federal land near the California-Nevada border, formally opened Thursday [2/13/2014] after years of regulatory and legal tangles ranging from relocating tortoises to assessing the impact on plants.

Horror at the world's largest solar farm days after it opens.  Environmentalists have hit out at a giant new solar farm in the Mojave Desert as mounting evidence reveals birds flying through the extremely hot 'thermal flux' surrounding the towers are being scorched.  After years of regulatory tangles around the impact on desert wildlife, the Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System opened on Thursday but environmental groups say the nearly 350,000 gigantic mirrors are generating 1000 degree Fahrenheit temperatures which are killing and singing [sic] birds.

Germany's Energy Goals Backfire.  Germany's radical initiative to subsidize renewable electricity generation has resulted in higher carbon dioxide emissions and the most expensive electricity in Europe, with the poor disproportionately bearing the burden.

Kansas Renewable Mandates Causing Skyrocketing Electricity Prices.  In 2009 the Kansas legislature passed legislation creating the mandates, which require Kansans to purchase 20 percent of their electricity from designated renewable sources by the year 2020.  Since 2009, U.S. electricity prices have risen merely 2.4 percent, from 9.89 cents per kilowatt hour to 10.13 cents per kilowatt hour (data through October 2013, the most recent month for which the U.S. Energy Information Administration published data when this paper went to press).  In Kansas, by contrast, electricity prices have risen 19.4 percent since 2009, from 8.07 cents per kilowatt hour to 9.64 cents per kilowatt hour.

Green Energy [is] Not Fit for the Grid.  Germany's wind and solar power generation came to a standstill in late 2013.  More than 23,000 wind turbines ran out of wind and most of the one million photovoltaic systems ran out of sunlight.  For a whole week, coal nuclear and gas-powered plants generated an estimated 95 percent of Germany's electricity.  Britain has 3,500 wind turbines, but during a period of extreme cold they produced just 1.8% of UK's electricity.  But, gluttons for punishment, politicians intend building more.

Solar Provides 0.2% of Electric Supply — Up From 0.02% Before Obama.  Solar power, which President Barack Obama promoted in his State of the Union Address, accounted for 0.2 percent of the U.S. electricity supply in the first nine months of 2013, according to data published by the U.S. government's Energy Information Administration.  That is up from the 0.02 percent of the total electricity supply that solar power sources provided in 2008, the last calendar year before Obama took office.

The Solar Swindle.  Solar electricity is growing, promoted, and most importantly, heavily subsidized.  The promoters of solar electricity claim that it is close to being competitive with conventional sources of electricity.  That is a fantasy.  Solar electricity is expensive and impractical.  If it weren't for government subsidies, some explicit and some disguised, the solar industry would collapse.

Electricity Prices Rise Dramatically Under Ohio Renewable Mandates.  Electricity prices in Ohio have risen approximately triple the national average since Ohio enacted renewable power mandates in 2008.  The sharp rise in electricity prices occurred despite promises during 2008 legislative hearings that renewable power mandates would have little or no impact on electricity prices.  In 2008 the Ohio legislature passed legislation creating the state's renewable power mandates.  Under the mandates, Ohioans must purchase 25 percent of their electricity from designated renewable sources by the year 2025.

Green Execution: Solar Power Project Killing Migratory Birds.  Next generation solar projects in California's Mojave Desert are creating next generation environmental destruction, scientists report, with solar panels luring migratory birds and then killing them with scorching heat.  The Palm Springs Desert Sun reports researchers found 34 dead birds at BrightSource Energy's Ivanpah solar power project during the month of September.  Fifteen of the dead birds had their feathers melted by the solar project's reflecting mirrors.  Other carcasses showed similar signs of trauma from the project's solar panels.

Solar Panels Frying Birds Along Major Migration Path.  Some animal rights activists are wondering just how many birds green energy may unintentionally kill as more and more birds turn up dead at solar energy facilities throughout California.  A recent article by Vice author Lex Berko notes that dead birds are being found with "singed wings" around several California solar energy facilities.  It happens that many of California's solar plants are, the article claims, in the path of "the four major north-to-south trajectories for migratory birds" called "the Pacific Flyway."

US citizens pay for 'solar school' foolishness.  Solar systems are being installed at hundreds of schools across the United States.  Educators use solar panels to teach students about the "miracle" of energy sourced from the sun.  But a closer look at these projects shows poor economics and a big bill for citizens.  Earlier this month, the National Resources Defense Fund (NRDC) launched its "Solar Schools" campaign, an effort to raise $54,000 to help "three to five to-be-determined schools move forward with solar rooftop projects."  The NRDC wants to "help every school in the country go solar."  The campaign uses a cute video featuring kids talking about how we're "polluting the Earth with gas and coal" and how we can save the planet with solar.

Energy Dept. Seeks Company to Turn Sunshine Into Gasoline.  Although CO2 is considered a "greenhouse gas" that contributes to climate change, if the Energy Department (DOE) finds partners to capitalize on the research of one of its laboratories, someday cars might run on sunshine.  Technically, cars would run on the product of sunlight, CO2, and water using a "two-step solar thermochemical cycle" developed by the Albuquerque, New Mexico government lab.

Burned out: Obama's first land auction for solar goes bust.  So much for the White House dream of solar selling like hotcakes.  The first federal auction run by the Bureau of Land Management to sell chances to build solar power projects on public land went completely bust on Thursday [10/24/2013].  Nobody showed to bid.  "We did not have any bidders come to the sale, and we did not received any sealed bids on the sale," BLM spokeswoman Vanessa Lacayo said, Denver Business Journal reported.

Abound Solar cleanup could cost $3.7 million.  Cleanup of the former production facility contaminated and abandoned by bankrupt Abound Solar Inc. is estimated to cost as much as $3.7 million, according to documents obtained by the Business Report.  As lawyers, regulators, bankruptcy officials and the landlord spar over the case, the building lies in disrepair, too contaminated to lease.

CA rooftop solar will cost other customers $1 billion per year.  Wealthy rooftop solar homeowners will shift $1.1 billion per year in extra costs onto other electric ratepayers by the year 2020, according to a new study just released by the California Public Utilities Commission.  Who benefits from net-metered solar rooftop systems is a contentious issue.  Sure to add controversy is the CPUC study finding that the median household income for customers with rooftop solar systems is $91,201 per year.

Abound Solar Cleanup Could Cost Nearly $4M.  The cleanup of bankrupt company Abound Solar Inc. will cost an estimated $3.7 million, according to Northern Colorado Business Report.

Global Warming Alarmism Wrecks European Economy.  Many Europeans complain about their high energy costs, largely due to their increasing dependence on renewables — the most costly energy sources.  But European political parties as well as a majority of people still want government to promote costly options, especially wind and solar power.  This is killing European economies.  Electricity costs in Europe are more than double the cost of electricity in the U.S.  High electricity costs make it difficult for businesses to operate if they need a lot of electricity.

Obama donor gained nearly $1b in tax credits in Solyndra bankruptcy.  Most people who follow the news are aware that President Obama invested $527 million in Solyndra, the now-bankrupt California-based solar panel manufacturing company.  What is much less well-known is that the federal government was legally required to cut its losses of tax dollars just months into the project, and that only an illegal loan modification made to benefit an Obama fundraiser led to taxpayers losing more than $500 million.  "The true engine of economic growth will always be companies like Solyndra," Obama declared in May 2010, but even then, the company was burning through more than $10 million a month and headed towards bankruptcy.

How Europe's Economy Is Being Devastated By Global Warming Orthodoxy.  Many Europeans complain about their high energy costs, largely due to their increasing dependence on renewables — the most costly energy sources.  But European political parties as well as a majority of people still want government to promote costly options, especially wind and solar power.  This is killing European economies.  Electricity costs in Europe are more than double the cost of electricity in the U.S.

Time for Solar Energy and Wind Farm Supporters to Stop Living in the Stone Age.  We've done wind and solar already.  They don't work too well.  Solar is great if you're sending a satellite into space outside the atmosphere.  If you want to power a modern home, it doesn't work unless you raise the price of electricity so sharply that solar suddenly becomes competitive.  And that's the environmentalist tactic.

Obama's Middle-Class 'Mission Accomplished'.  Obama's idea of a "durable industry" seems to be solar companies like Solyndra and electric car suppliers like A123 Systems.  Both of these "durable" companies filed for bankruptcy after obtaining generous loans from the Obama administration.  Taxpayer money that would otherwise have been invested to create good jobs in the private sector was squandered so the president could pretend he was a green energy pioneer.  In reality, he has never been a pioneer at anything.  He is an old-fashioned radical who still harbors the adolescent fantasy of a Marxist utopia.

The constantly varying output power from wind and solar facilities puts a physical strain on Plan B.
Cycling Damages Power Plants.  Natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) and coal-fired power plants are supposed to be started, ramped up to speed, and run under constant conditions until being shut down.  That's why they are called base load power plants — they provide a steady output of electricity.  They are not designed to be load following plants, where the power plant ramps up and down to follow the load, i.e., demand.  If they are forced to follow the load, which is the case when wind and solar are on the grid, the sudden changes in temperature damages parts in the boilers and turbines.

Dietz & Watson warehouse blaze: solar panels hampered firefighting, officials say.  More than 7,000 solar panels on the roof of a burning warehouse in Burlington County proved too much of a hazard for firefighters, local officials said today.  "We may very well not be able to save buildings that have alternative energy," William Kramer, New Jersey's acting fire marshall, said after Delanco Fire Chief Ron Holt refused to send his firefighters onto the roof of the 300,000-square foot Dietz & Watson facility, ablaze since Sunday afternoon.  Solar panels are particularly hazardous to firefighters for a number of reasons, according to Ken Willette, a division manager with the National Fire Protection Association.

California's Smoke Signals.  Like so many other emergencies in California, this one is government-made and a warning about its green political obsessions. [...] To hit the renewable mandate, utilities are building long transmission lines to deliver power from distant solar and wind projects to population centers.  Most large-scale solar plants in California are being built in dry, sunny desert and valley regions.  Wind farms are concentrated in the mountains.  Both are fire-prone.

White House installing solar panels on first family residence.  President Obama in 2009 directed federal agencies to improve energy efficiency and increase the use of renewable energy, and in late 2010 pledged to put solar panels on the White House.

Climate Realism and Socialist Realism.  Not only does solar power, at the plant gate, cost 4-8 times as much as conventional power, but it is erratic and seasonal to say nothing of not working at night. [...] The Department of Energy is spinning a fantasy.  Most of the cost of solar power is in pedestrian things like steel and concrete.  Even if the cost of photovoltaic panels were zero, solar would not be remotely competitive.  If complete solar plants cost zero, it would still not be practicable due to the cost of backup plants, electricity storage and long power lines.

Billions Burned on Obama's Green Energy.  Solyndra filed for bankruptcy in September 2011.  It was just the bellwether; the first of many to come.  A year later Christine Lakatos and I profiled nearly 20 green-energy stimulus-funded companies that had gone bankrupt.  The next week, we highlighted the other bookend:  "companies/projects that received funding from various loan guarantee programs (LGP), grants, and tax incentives.  These are projects that are still functioning, but are facing difficulties."  One of those troubled companies was A123 Systems.  One week after our report, A123 filed for bankruptcy.  Nearly two months later, A123 was purchased by a large Chinese auto parts maker that has renamed the lithium-ion battery company B456.

Fleming Amendment Ends Another Taxpayer Bailout.  The Obama 2009 stimulus bill cost taxpayers about $830 billion, and much of it was wasted on growing government and administration giveaways, like a $3.25 billion loan program that put taxpayers on the hook for failed green energy projects.  A company could take a government loan and walk away from a project without paying taxpayers back, even if the company remained in business.

Louisiana Law Will Phase out Solar Tax Credit.  Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal has signed legislation phasing out the state's tax credit for solar energy.  The credit will expire at the end of 2017. [...] The tax credit amounts to 50 percent of the first $25,000 of the cost of each system, and it may be applied to personal, corporate, or franchise taxes.

Minnesota Implements Solar Power Mandate.  According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the levelized costs for generating electricity from solar power will be more than double the costs for generating electricity from natural gas for at least the next several decades.  For every increment of solar power added to the Minnesota electricity mix, customers will see that portion of their electric bill more than double.

Spanish downturn a disaster for green energy.  "We have sued in the Spanish courts," said Miguel Angel Martinez-Aroca, president of Anpier, which groups Spanish solar energy producers.  The sector is "barely surviving after so many cuts", he said.  His association has launched a campaign to highlight the unknown victims of the new austerity regime:  people who put their savings into solar panels counting on the subsidies to make them profitable and, for example, to help finance their retirement.

The 'Great Renewables Scam' unravels.  Energy insiders have long known that the notion of 'renewable energy' is a romantic proposition — and an economic bust.  But it is amazing what the lure of guaranteed 'few strings attached' government subsidies can achieve.  Even the Big Oil companies bought into the renewables revolution, albeit mostly for PR reasons.  Like Shell, however, many quickly abandoned their fledgling renewable arms.  Post-2008, they knew, the subsidy regimes could not last.  Neither was the public buying into the new PR message.

Europe's Renewables Hype Implodes As German Solar Goes Belly Up.  Energy insiders have long known that the notion of viable 'renewable energy' was always a romantic proposition — and an economic bust.  But it is amazing what the lure of guaranteed 'few strings' attached government subsidies can achieve. [...] Now it was just a question of time before Europe's world leading pioneers of solar and wind power, Germany and the UK, decided they had had enough of the self-inflicted economic pain.  And all the signs are, as Germany's solar sector just went belly up and the UK is made aware of how much every wind job actually costs, that the slow implosion of the renewables revolution is under way.

SolarCity Sues Federal Government for More Subsidies.  The Obama administration's efforts to promote renewable energy took an unexpected turn in May when it was revealed a major recipient of Washington's largesse had turned on the hand that had been feeding it and sued the federal government, claiming it had not received all the money to which it was entitled.  In February, San Mateo, Calif.-based SolarCity quietly brought suit in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, saying the U.S. Treasury Department had retroactively changed the rules for a program that oversees taxpayer-funded grants to solar installation companies.

Europe Wants "Backsies" on Green Energy Policies.  Wind and solar power come at a premium; setting quotas for energy produced from these sources is going to drive prices up.  This is what happens when you try and prop up technologies not ready to compete on their own merits.  You become less competitive with regions that haven't handicapped themselves.

Company dumps big Laughlin solar project, says market won't support it.  A Chinese-backed company is pulling the plug on a multibillion-dollar solar project near Laughlin after it was unable to find customers for the power that would have been generated there, a Clark County spokesman said Friday [6/14/2013].

Solar price rise to end power divide.  Australia's one million rooftop solar households could be forced to pay new fixed charges to help recover billions of dollars in taxpayer subsidies and make electricity prices fairer for all consumers.

Cost of German Solar Is Four Times Finnish Nuclear.  German solar panels installed between 2000 and 2011 will cumulatively supply about 400 terawatt-hours (TWh) to the grid by 2031.  Between 2000 and 2031 Germany's electricity ratepayers will pay about $130 billion for the solar PV generation from these panels installed between 2000 and 2011 in the form of 20-year feed-in tariff contracts, at an average cost of 32 cents a kWh.  Moreover, solar panels do not last as long as nuclear reactors and also give reduced output as they age.  After three decades a single nuclear plant with the same output of Olkiluoto would generate about as much electricity as all of the German panels installed in the last decade.

Don't fall for the solar panel flannel!.  This solar panel installation will pay for itself — when the owner is 154 years old.

SolarWorld Lays Off Oregon Workers, Bankruptcy May Follow.  Taxpayer-subsidized SolarWorld laid off 40 workers at its Hillsboro, Oregon plant earlier this year, marking nearly 300 workers laid off company-wide after state officials invited the company to apply for up to $100 million in subsidies and the company accepted at least $27 million in subsidies.

Renewable Energy: Bringing Blackouts Back to California?  The epidemic of power outages and "rolling blackouts" which nearly shut down California in the early 2000s may be returning.  Back then, the culprits were unscrupulous energy providers like Enron and a poorly-thought out process of deregulation.  This time, renewable energy would be to blame, as the state has pushed to increase the use of solar and wind energy without ensuring that there is enough traditional power generation to keep the grid stable on cloudy, windless days.

The Solar Panel Domino Effect.  Solar projects that have received help from the federal government could be affected by the bankruptcy of a mirror manufacturer that benefited from federal aid. [...] Flabeg is reported to have received millions of dollars in financial assistance from federal and sate governments.  Pennsylvania helped the mirror manufacturer build its plant near Pittsburgh with $9 million in grants and loans.  The Obama administration awarded Flabeg $10.2 million in tax credits, according to the [Pittsburgh] Post-Gazette.

Ohio Utilities Panel Derails Expensive Solar Project.  Ohio state officials struck a severe blow to a plan to construct the largest solar-panel array east of the Rockies when the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio found utility American Electric Power "did not prove that the project is needed."  Developers proposed constructing the 49.9 megawatt Turning Point Solar project on 500 acres of land near Zanesville in southeastern Ohio.  American Electric Power (AEP) joined forces with Agile Energy in plans to deploy 225,000 solar panels on the site.  Developers estimated the project would cost $250 million.

U.S. and China waste billions on solar panel race.  What happens when China and the United States clash in a subsidy-fueled solar panel arms race?  The world gets a lot more solar panels than anyone wants to buy, manufacturers go bankrupt, and taxpayers get stuck with the tab.  Will the recent bankruptcy of subsidized Chinese solar giant Suntech Power cause the Obama administration to tone down its argument that we need to match China's solar policy?

Flabeg, solar energy company in Findlay, going bust.  A Findlay-based solar power firm that was awarded nearly $20 million in state and federal tax breaks and grants ceased production last week and cannot afford to pay $197,000 that terminated employees say is owed in severance packages. [...] Over the past several years, the solar industry has seen several high-profile bankruptcy cases.

Here's the Cold Hard Truth About Solar Energy.  This winter has provided a good example of how things can go wrong.  Solar has a major drawback in that all panels shut off at the same time.  That requires massive reliance on other sources of energy.  Despite its avowed decision to relinquish nuclear power, Germany must now import nuclear-generated power from neighboring countries and resort to coal, despite an earlier move to the contrary, in the face of the highest energy costs in Europe.  The government is even opening taboo fuel oil generators to make up the power slack.

Claim: Germany Spends $110 Billion to Delay Global Warming by 37 Hours.  Bjorn Lomborg claimed on John Stossel's television show last night that money isn't being spent well to combat "global warming":  "The Germans are spending about $110 billion on subsidies for these solar panels," said Lomborg.  "The net effect of all those investments will be to postpone global warming by 37 hours by the end of the century."

The Dream of a World Without Oil.  [Mark Z.] Jacobsen's article provides a thorough assessment of the future of WWS [wind, water and solar].  Unfortunately, rather than buttress his argument, his figures undermine the conclusion that we don't need fossil fuels.

Bosch abandons solar energy.  In a rare reversal of strategy from the manufacturing conglomerate, Bosch said on Friday [3/22/2013] it would end its photovoltaics, or solar panel production early next year and put parts of the business up for sale.  Unlisted Bosch, one of the world's largest maker of car parts, has lost 2.4 billion euros (2 billion pounds) since it created the solar energy unit in 2008 after it bought Aleo Solar and Ersol.

Bosch to abandon solar energy business.  German engineering company Bosch said Friday that it is abandoning its solar energy business, because there is no way to make it economically viable amid overcapacity and huge price pressure in the industry.

World's Largest Solar Company Files for Bankruptcy.  The world's largest solar panel maker, China's Suntech Power, put its Wuxi subsidiary into bankruptcy following poor sales and sanctions on the company, reports CNN Money.

Green Energy Has A Brownout Problem.  How do you keep the power on when the wind won't blow and the sun won't shine?  As California has discovered, it's a problem that's neither easy nor cheap to solve in the brave new world of renewables.

American Jobs, Chinese Profits.  The U.S. Export-Import Bank (Ex-Im) is financing the purchase of solar panels from a manufacturer now owned by the Chinese that had previously attracted investments from prominent Democrats, the bank announced Wednesday [3/27/2013].  The deal comes amid criticism of the bank's support of foreign competition to American businesses and accusations of cronyism.  Ex-Im approved a loan to an Indian developer who wants to buy solar panels from MiaSolé, a California-based solar panel manufacturer.

Are global wind power resource estimates overstated?  Wind turbines extract kinetic energy from the mean flow and produce a plume of low velocity air downstream.  At the local scale it is well understood that wind turbines cannot be spaced too closely together or the power extracted per turbine will decrease driving up the amortized cost of electricity.  At the scale of typical commercial wind farms, which rarely have more than a few rows of turbines along the prevailing wind direction, turbines are typically spaced 5-10 rotor diameters apart, equivalent to a density of 2-10 MW of installed wind turbine capacity per square kilometer, or a peak power output of 2-10 W [per square meter] of land surface area.

The dirty side of clean solar energy:  While solar is a far less polluting energy source than coal or natural gas, many panel makers are nevertheless grappling with a hazardous waste problem.  Fueled partly by billions in government incentives, the industry is creating millions of solar panels each year and, in the process, millions of pounds of polluted sludge and contaminated water.  To dispose of the material, the companies must transport it by truck or rail far from their own plants to waste facilities hundreds and, in some cases, thousands of miles away.

I hope you have a gas-powered generator as a backup.
Overly Overcast: Germany Weathers Darkest Winter in 43 Years.  The days may be getting longer, but there's still not a hint of springtime sunshine in Germany.  Weather data shows that this winter has been the gloomiest in 43 years.  If the sun doesn't start shining soon, it will be the darkest winter on record.

Renewable Energy Investment Goes Up in Smoke.  The Spanish Parliament approved a law on Thursday [2/14/2013] that cuts subsidies for alternative energy technologies, backtracking on its push for green power.  That measure, along with other recent laws including a tax on power generation that hit green energy investments especially hard, will virtually wipe out profits for photovoltaic, solar thermal and wind plants, sector lobbyists say.

California is "greening" itself toward a third world electrical grid.  Alas, California's ecotwits have forced most of the state's fossil fueled power plants into mothballs.  The ones that are still limping along will likely be shuttered by 2020 thanks to onerous and prohibitively expensive upgrades required under the Clean Air Act.  So what will happen on cloudy, windless days?

Bankrupt Abound Solar to Bury Unused Solar Panels in Cement.  Colorado-based Abound Solar has been ordered to remove and bury in cement thousands of leftover solar panels "deemed unsellable" by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE).  The company must also clean up other hazardous waste at a number of facilities statewide, according to the Northern Colorado Business Report (NCBR).  The cleanup is expected to cost at least $2.2 million.

Lomborg: Electricity prices for German households have increased 61% since 2000 — renewables blamed.  Real German electricity prices for households have increased 61% since 2000.  One quarter of household costs now stems directly from renewable energy.  Also, the increase is *not* because of increasing production costs (which have actually slightly declined since 1978).  The increase is due to dramatically increasing taxes, most noticeably from the Renewable Energy Act (EEG).  In 2013 the EEG will increase 50% to 6.28 euro-cent (5.28 cents plus 19% VAT).

Environmentalists suing the Interior Department over solar zones.  The Interior Department identified 'solar zones' across Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico and Utah, and prioritized designing a program to fast-track solar permits for their designated areas.  The entire purpose of this ostentatious bureaucratic exercise, of course, is to help the Obama administration beef up and showcase their super-duper green, environmentalist credentials... except that a lot of well-organized environmentalists are actually pretty ticked off about the whole thing.

Another Blow To Germany's Solar Industry.  Over the last two years, almost every single one of Germany's solar module and equipment manufacturers, most heavily subsidised by taxpayers, has closed in a wave of insolvencies not seen since East German industry collapsed in the wake of the fall of the Berlin Wall.

Solar industry grapples with hazardous wastes.  While solar is a far less polluting energy source than coal or natural gas, many panel makers are nevertheless grappling with a hazardous waste problem.

Barack H. Obama is intentionally strangling the American economy.
Solar development absorbing Calif. farmland.  There's a land rush of sorts going on across the nation's most productive farming region, but these buyers don't want to grow crops.

Mafia's new business enterprise: renewable energy.  Willie Sutton, a notorious thief from the 1930's, was once asked why he robbed banks.  "Because that's where the money is," he replied.  So where's the money today?  Government subsidies for renewable energy — massive subsidies with little oversight.  In Europe, this means easy pickings for organized crime.  And the Sicilian mafia is cleaning up.

Obama's dirty clean-energy deals.  Three of the country's biggest residential solar-panel installers — SolarCity, SunRun and Sungevity  — have been subpoenaed by Treasury's Office of Inspector General for their financial records to determine if they had inflated the market value of their costs when they applied for federal reimbursement.  The firms have reportedly received more than $500 million in federal grants and tax credits.  Officials in two of them, SolarCity and SunRun, have been among some of Mr. Obama's most generous campaign donors.

Harvard Needs Remedial Energy Math.  Wind and solar power cannot possibly meet the world's growing need for more electricity.

Solar Subsidy: Californians to be charged $1.3 billion for not using solar panels.  Regulations subsidizing the use of solar panels in California will cost customers who don't have them $1.3 billion annually, according a report in the San Francisco Chronicle.  California utility companies claim that rates will have to be raised on traditional customers to make up the shortfall.

Solar power adds to nonusers' costs.  Booming rooftop solar installations in California are bringing an unwelcome surprise to the homes and businesses that don't have the devices:  an extra $1.3 billion added to their annual bills, more than half of that for Pacific Gas & Electric customers.

Solar firms probed for possible 'misrepresentations' in getting public money.  Three of the country's most prolific installers of residential solar panels are under federal investigation to determine if they inflated the cost of their work to increase the payments they would receive from the government, according to government and industry officials familiar with the probe.  SolarCity, SunRun and Sungevity have received subpoenas from the Treasury Department's office of inspector general for financial records to justify more than $500 million in federal grants and tax credits the firms tapped for performing work.

Navy builds solar power farm near Norfolk base.  The solar farm contains more than 8,600 panels, each bolted onto steel stilts in a marshy field called Monkey Bottom, just outside the fenceline of Norfolk Naval Station.  Together, they can generate up to 2.1 megawatts of electricity — enough to power 200 homes, said Michelle Perry, project manager for the Naval Facilities Engineering Command.  That's only about 2 percent of the electricity required to run the Norfolk Navy base [...] The project cost $21 million and was part of President Barack Obama's stimulus package.

The Editor says...
News reports of this sort almost always say that a project can generate "up to" a certain amount of power, but that figure is at the peak of a daily cycle, on a clear day, and only if the panels are free of snow and dirt.  Reporters never seem to mention that solar panels experience lengthy power failures — every night!

So, how's your green energy stock doing?  RENIXX® World, the Renewable Energy Industrial Index of the world's top green energy companies, hit an all-time low below 146 on November 21, down more than 90 percent from the December 2007 peak.  The RENIXX index was established in 2006.  It's composed of the world's 30 largest renewable energy companies with more than 50 percent of revenues coming from wind, solar, biofuel, or geothermal energy, or the hydropower or fuel cell sector.

$14 Billion in Stimulus Spending Generates Just 1.2 Percent of Electricity.  Despite more than $14 billion in cash payments to solar, wind, and other renewable energy project developers since 2009, just 48 terawatt hours of additional annual electricity generation were expected to be added through funds authorized by the stimulus, according to documents released by the Department of Treasury.  The more than 45,000 projects brought online through 2012 would represent less than 1.2 percent of overall electricity generation, according to figures provided by the U.S. Energy Information Administration for 2011.

Solar power plants burden the counties that host them.  An economic consultant hired by [Inyo] county found that property tax revenue would be a fraction of the customary amount because portions of the plant qualifiy [sic] for a solar tax exclusion.  Fewer than 10 local workers would land permanent positions — and just 5% of the construction jobs would be filled by county residents.  And construction workers are likely to spend their money across the nearby state line, in Nevada.

SolarWorld lays off up to 37 in Hillsboro, saying tariffs have yet to provide relief.  SolarWorld will lay off as many as 37 workers from its Hillsboro plant, company officials confirmed Wednesday [11/14/2012].  The factory, which makes solar cells and panels, is suffering from a market downturn that SolarWorld blames primarily on unfair competition from China.

Solar power, too, was gone with Sandy's wind.  The thousands of solar-powered New Jersey homeowners have spent the last week at the mercy of the power grid, just like everyone else.  "I've been asked that all week long," says Jeff Lega, whose home in Brick is covered in rooftop solar panels.  "'Why don't you have power?'"  Understanding the answer requires an understanding of how residential solar panels function.