The Deep State "Whistleblower" Scandal and President Trump's Interaction with Ukrainian President Zelensky
Introduction by The Editor:
Donald Trump is a political outsider, starting his political career at the top. His election has upset the
political establishment on the left and the right. Mostly the left. The party that lost the 2016 election
immediately began a campaign to impeach and remove Donald Trump by any means. Apparently it doesn't matter if
there are any legitimate grounds for his impeachment.
The most recent development in the never-ending impeachment crusade is the appearance of a Deep State "whistleblower,"
who made a derogatory report about President Trump, apparently based entirely on hearsay. These baseless accusations
are enough to keep the Impeachment Wing of the Democratic Party clamoring for Mr. Trump's removal from office,
without presenting any evidence of a crime!
in the 21st Century: 20 Long Years of Constant Brainwashing. For six months last fall and winter, the entirety
of our news media actively conspired with Adam Schiff, Nancy Pelosi, Gerrold Nadler and the entire DC Swamp to brainwash you
into believing that you should support the impeachment of President Trump over a phone call in which nothing improper was
discussed. They knew if they could cause a massive shift in public opinion they might be able to convince enough GOP
senators to give up the ghost and get it done. That one failed, other than to get half a vote from the same traitor who
threw the 2012 election.
10 Most Bizarre Viral Hoaxes of 2019. [#10] What would 2019 be without the unraveling of a brand new hoax
involving a foreign country now that the Russia collusion hoax has effectively dissolved? By October, President Trump
was accused of withholding aid over a routine phone call he had with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Despite
the questionable circumstances surrounding the so-called "whistleblower" and no proven quid pro quo, Democrats admittedly
turned to "hearsay" for evidence. With witnesses unable to answer direct questions about what exactly Trump had done
that was impeachable, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) disseminating fake transcripts at hearings, and a plethora of other
factors, Democrats have nonetheless used the Ukraine hoax as the catalyst for their "impeachment" narrative ahead of 2020.
Decade of Fake News. 2019: Ukraine phone call and impeachment. The Democrats, relying on a second- or
third-hand complaint from a so-called "whistleblower," claimed that president Trump tried to "solicit interference from a
foreign country in the 2020 U.S. election." Trump released the rough "transcript" of the call, showing he had done
nothing of the sort. The Democrats pressed ahead with impeachment, using the media to publish selective leaks of
Abuse of Congressional Power. First, [...] not one scintilla of evidence has been adduced that President
Trump was seeking a false judgment on the conduct in Ukraine of former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter. He
was asking for an investigation, not seeking to dictate the conclusion. Trump said to President Volodymyr Zelensky in
his famous July 25 telephone call that it "looked horrible," but was clear he was seeking a neutral judgment of whether there
had been influence-peddling or other wrongdoing. There is absolutely no legal or ethical problem with that, so this
entire controversy has been even more fatuous and unfounded than it appears.
The Empire Strikes
Back. From the beginning — that is to say, from November 9, 2016 — impeachment has been a
cause in search of a trigger, an occasion. The president's enemies hoped they'd finally hit pay dirt when an anonymous
"whistle blower" alleged that the president made, or attempted to make, foreign aid to Ukraine contingent on that country's
government investigating his likely 2020 challenger. Or, in other words, that Trump attempted to "collude" with a
foreign power to influence an American election. Where have we heard that before? It only took two years,
$32 million, 19 lawyers, 40 FBI agents and other staff, 2,800 subpoenas, and 500 witnesses for a special counsel to "not
establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election
interference activities," according to the Mueller Report. Yet here we go again?
Our Bankrupt Nomenklatura.
Adam Schiff is a Harvard Law School graduate and, as he reminds us, for a time a federal attorney. [...] When Schiff felt the
presidential Ukrainian call transcript was too nondescript, he simply made his own up version, before redefining it as a
parody when people noticed. He has now created an impeachment hysteria on the basis of second- and third-hand gossip,
bundled together by a former intelligence officer, Trump opponent, and Biden associate, who under the guise of a
"whistleblower" first met Schiff's staff to translate his rumors into legalese before notifying the inspector
general — a process about which Schiff flat out lied. Schiff's notion of an impeachment inquiry is to forbid
transparency, to hector hostile witnesses in closed session and to publicly praise obsequious ones, and then to step out to
cameras, furrow his brow, bite his lip, and lecture that he had never seen such "incriminating" disclosures the substance of
which he, unfortunately, cannot disclose, as he leaks distortions to the leftwing media.
None Dare Call It Sedition. Respectfully, Mr. President, this is not a witch hunt. This is a
coup. The objective and tactics have been clear from the start. It is no longer silent. The evidence grows
daily. The recently released tweets from the attorney for the "whistleblower" confirmed what we have long believed.
"Coup has started," he wrote prophetically. Indeed it had. And it continues. They almost succeeded. The
co-conspirators deserve much worse than to be sent packing in the next election. Long prison sentences are the only sure
deterrent to prevent this from ever happening again. Calling the "whistleblower" a whistleblower is a misnomer.
He is a partisan second-hand leaker. He is a coward and a traitor. He and all those who conspired with him
should be treated as such.
are the mutineers who will save the Democrat Party from Adam Schiff? Watching Schiff's trumped up inquiry about
nothing but a phone call, the transcript of which has been available to the public for many weeks, is like watching The
Caine Mutiny (1954) without the drama. The film is about a naval captain whose first officer relieves him of his
command when the man demonstrates obvious signs of mental instability. [...] [Captain] Queeg was obsessed with missing
strawberries. Schiff's impending mental breakdown is demonstrably more obvious, less subtle than Queeg's. He
intends to see President Trump removed from office, no matter what. His eyes seem to radiate his inner fury and
rage. He sits stone-faced while the smart people in the room destroy every bit of his carefully constructed
narrative. His fellow Democrats all dutifully use the prescribed talking points and focus-grouped terms like "quid pro
quo," then "obstruction," then "extortion," now "bribery," a word not one of the so-called "witnesses" used to describe the
conversation. Schiff is Capt. Queeg on steroids.
Timely news and commentary:
Deep State Wins if Trump Loses. Some swamp animals are communal and hunt in packs, like Alexander Vindman and
his buddy, the "Don't call me Eric Ciaramella" whistleblower. Surely the softest Ranger that elite group ever produced,
Col. Vindman and the Pajama Boy Who Mustn't Be Named conspired to remove President Trump via impeachment. They
were aided in this pathetic spectacle by a lying, bug-eyed loon, U.S. Rep. Adam Schiff. This shady trio produced
the most forgettable impeachment in history, such a weak and perfunctory exercise that it's hard to believe the impeachment
happened a mere seven months ago.
slams Adam Schiff for unfairly broad probe after whistleblower complaint. The Department of Homeland Security
is requesting that House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff narrow the scope of his now-expanded probe into the
agency's response to police brutality protests this summer, arguing the investigation had become unreasonably broad. In
a letter dated Monday [9/14/2020] obtained by The [New York] Post, Beth Spivey, assistant secretary for DHS' legislative
affairs office, rejected a request from Schiff (D-Calif.) for 11 new interviews with department officials and slammed the
investigation as a whole.
Jeffrey Goldberg Asks Alexander Vindman If Trump is Russian 'Asset'. The Atlantic's Jeffrey Goldberg
scored the first post-impeachment interview with Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman on Monday and asked what he described
as the "key question": "Does he believe that Trump is an asset of Russian intelligence?" Vindman's answer largely
regurgitates left-wing conspiracy theories about Russian influence. [...] Goldberg, who described Vindman as an "idealist,"
also took him on a tour of the Watergate building in Washington, DC, to drive home the apparent parallels. Goldberg did
not appear to ask Vindman about his role in informing the so-called "whistleblower" in the impeachment trial ("A
whistleblower shared details of the call," he wrote).
Schiff Mounts His Dead Russia Horse Again. As has been pointed out by many of us recently, the Democrats really
aren't behaving as if their presidential candidate had a substantial lead in the polls. Yes, the polls have been
tightening, but the Dems have been in a sort of flop-sweat panic mode since the Republican National Convention ended.
There is, of course, the fact that every public appearance by der Bidengaffer since then has been hovering in the
neighborhood of "unmitigated disaster." The Democrats do seem to be trying to get to their October surprises early this
year. That reeks of desperation. Speaking of reeking, California's little impeachment pitbull Adam Schiff is
back. Guess what, kids? He's got another whistleblower!
Editorial Board: All the Adam Schiff transcripts — Chair knew there was no proof of Russia-Trump
collusion. Americans expect that politicians will lie, but sometimes the examples are so brazen that they
deserve special notice. Newly released Congressional testimony shows that Adam Schiff spread falsehoods shamelessly
about Russia and Donald Trump for three years even as his own committee gathered contrary evidence. The House
Intelligence Committee last week released 57 transcripts of interviews it conducted in its investigation into Russia's
meddling in the 2016 election. The committee probe started in January 2017 under then-Chair Devin Nunes and concluded
in March 2018 with a report finding no evidence that the Trump campaign conspired with the Kremlin. Most of the
transcripts were ready for release long ago, but Mr. Schiff oddly refused to release them after he became chairman in
2019. He only released them last week when the White House threatened to do it first.
Trump was totally right to fire the intel inspector-general. Firing the US intelligence community's inspector
general is a big deal. I should know. I was a former longtime Central Intelligence Agency official who blew the
whistle on the Clinton White House and agency bosses. Even so, I believe President Trump's firing last week of IC
Inspector General Michael Atkinson was appropriate — indeed, overdue. Liberals and their media allies are
predictably framing the firing as retaliation for Atkinson's decision to inform Congress about a complaint by a so-called
whistleblower that set off the Democratic effort to impeach the president. That's false.
Inspector General Michael Atkinson Roundly Deserved To Be Fired. On Saturday, reporters queried President Trump
about his Friday firing of Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson. Trump's response seemingly
confirmed the left-leaning press and Democrats' narrative that the firing was retaliation for the IG informing the House
Intelligence Committee of a whistleblower's complaint. That complaint concerned Trump's conversation with the Ukrainian
president that set in motion Trump's impeachment. But what the media and Trump's political opponents won't tell you is
that Trump is right. [...] A full vetting of Atkinson's handling of the so-called whistleblower's complaint confirms Trump's
take that Atkinson "did an absolutely terrible job." But this does require a deep dive into both the law and the fact, as
opposed to a mere mimicking of the Democrats' talking points that seems the default of today's lazy journalists. So,
here are the details you need to know to fully understand why Trump lost confidence in Atkinson and opted to exercise his
presidential power-of-appointment prerogative and replace him.
ICIG Michael Atkinson Releases Ridiculous Political "Statement". [Scroll down] The DOJ and FBI have an
internal FISA self-check mechanism. The DOJ National Security Division (DOJ-NSD) chief counsel Michael Atkinson, and
the chief counsel for every FBI field office are required to conduct an "Accuracy Review" of selected FISA
applications. One per field office (25 to 30 field offices),which are also sent to DOJ-NSD (main justice) for general
counsel Atkinson inspection. Horowitz detailed 39 examples of Michael Atkinsons' willful violations of law and policy
within 42 "accuracy review" files at the DOJ-NSD. The error rate within the DOJ-NSD files that Atkinson was responsible
for was over 93%. IG Michael Horowitz was so alarmed by the gross incompetence he sent an urgent interim memorandum
to the DOJ and FBI notifying the Attorney General and FBI Director of the systemic violations discovered.
Eric Ciaramella Was Hosting 2016 WH Meeting Where Ukrainian Officials Were Told To Drop Investigation Of Hunter
Biden! This explains it. Anti-Trump CIA whistleblower Eric Ciaramella filed his second-hand
"whistleblower" complaint against President Trump after speaking with Adam Schiff's team in September. Ciaramella
claimed he was concerned about President Trump's discussion of Hunter Biden during his call with Ukrainian President
Zelensky. Now we know why Ciaramella was so concerned. According to White House visitor logs Eric Ciaramella was
hosting the January 19, 2016 White House meeting where Ukrainian officials were told to drop the investigation into
firing, right reason: Trump was right to fire Michael Atkinson. Doing the Friday-night news dump thang,
while attention is in any case focused on the coronavirus, President Trump moved to get rid of the Intelligence Community's
inspector general, Michael Atkinson. That's the guy who changed the rules to accommodate the so-called whistleblower,
with zero firsthand knowledge, to file his whistleblowings about President Trump with Adam Schiff's House Intelligence
Committee staff, planning it all out beforehand, in order to open the gates to impeachment. Until Atkinson came along,
a whistleblower needed to have firsthand knowledge of official wrongdoing, not water-cooler talk from fellow malcontents in
the Deep State trying to come up with some way to Get Trump. The fact that the likely whistleblower, CIA analyst Eric
Ciaramella, was able to file such charges with nothing more than disliking Trump as his motive is precisely why the
impeachment bid failed against the president and ended as such a farce.
Trump: Inspector General Michael Atkinson Did a 'Terrible Job'. President Donald Trump said Saturday at
the White House that Inspector General Michael Atkinson did a "terrible job" in his position. Atkinson was the
Inspector General for the Intelligence community that informed Congress of the whistleblower report about President Donald
Trump's phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. The president announced Friday that he had dismissed
Atkinson, prompting criticism from Democrats.
Trump Removes Coup Plotter ICIG Michael Atkinson — Effective 30 Days From Today. President Trump has
sent a letter to congress giving them 30-days advance notice and informing them of the removal of Intelligence Community
Inspector General Michael Atkinson: [...] The necessary, albeit politically controversial, move comes about two months after
President Trump assigned Ric Grenell to lead the Office of the Director of National Intelligence; Grenell is ultimately the
acting boss of the overall intelligence community. It is likely DNI Grenell provided some key insight into the sketchy
background activity in/around Atkinson's office, and the overall intelligence apparatus writ large.
fires watchdog who handled Ukraine complaint. President Donald Trump has fired Michael Atkinson, the inspector
general for the intelligence community who handled the whistleblower complaint that triggered Trump's impeachment.
Trump informed the Senate intelligence committee Friday of his decision to fire Atkinson, according to a letter obtained by
The Associated Press.
fires Michael Atkinson, intelligence IG who told Congress about Ukraine phone call: report. President Trump has
reportedly fired Michael Atkinson, the inspector general for the U.S. intelligence community who alerted Congress to concerns
about a Trump phone call with the president of Ukraine — a matter that led to the president's impeachment last
year. Trump formally notified the intelligence committees of both the Senate and House in a letter dated Friday
[4/3/2020] that was obtained by Politico.
Paul Blasts YouTube over Censorship of Speech on Senate Floor. Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) has called out
Google-owned YouTube after it blacklisted a clip of him speaking on the Senate floor, an act of censorship he calls "chilling
and disturbing." Google censored Paul because he read out the name of the alleged "whistleblower," Eric Ciaramella.
Politico reported the story as "new," even though Breitbart News first revealed that YouTube was blocking clips of the
Senator mentioning Ciaramella's name last week.
Saving Private Ciaramella.
During the Senate trial, there was one portentous occurrence when Chief Justice John Roberts declined to read aloud a
question addressed to the House managers from Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.). [...] Paul's question cuts to the heart of the
matter. Regardless of who the whistleblower may be, Paul wants to know if Ciaramella, Misko, and possibly other Schiff
staffers conspired to impeach the president. If it turns out that Ciaramella is the whistleblower, then the follow-up
question becomes whether or not he conspired with Schiff, et al., to concoct what is now exposed as a fictitious
and materially false and misleading account of the Trump-Zelensky call. Did Ciaramella submit a false complaint to the
inspector general? If so, was his false report concocted with Schiff, et al.? Is Ciaramella at the
heart of this fraudulent and failed impeachment effort?
Censors Rand Paul's Speech Naming the Whistleblower. The Big Tech company Google, along with its video-sharing
subsidiary YouTube, has been banning videos of a speech from the floor of the U.S. Senate where Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.)
named the whistleblower, according to Breitbart News. In the speech, Senator Paul highlighted the highly
questionable and suspicious interactions between a staffer on the House Intelligence Committee, Shawn Misko, and the
whistleblower, CIA operative Eric Ciaramella. Although numerous investigative journalists have speculated Ciaramella is
the whistleblower, Democrats and the media have been suppressing any mention of his name. As Breitbart notes, YouTube's
actions to censor the video in question constitute a direct censorship of the congressional and historical record, an
unprecedented act of censorship of public information.
Lashes Out at Rand Paul For Dropping Eric Ciaramella's Name on Senate Floor — Rand Paul Responds with
Fire! Former CIA Director John Brennan lashed out at Senator Rand Paul for blowing up the impeachment trial by
dropping Eric Ciaramella's name on the Senate floor. Last week Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts played politics and
refused to read Senator Rand Paul's question on the Anti-Trump whistleblower during the Senate impeachment
trial! On Tuesday during his closing comments Senator Rand Paul read aloud his question on the floor of the US
Senate. Rand Paul named the anti-Trump CIA operative Eric Ciaramella and his NatSec-crony-turned Schiff-aide Sean Misko
on the senate floor. Brennan planted Eric Ciaramella in the White House in order to spy on President Trump, according
to investigative reporter Paul Sperry, who revealed the identity of the whistleblower in an explosive Real Clear
Investigations exposé. Brennan's Russian collusion canard failed to remove Trump from office and his second
coup attempt just went up in flames.
The News They Won't Report.
Jake Tapper doesn't want you to know the name of the so-called "whistleblower" who caused the impeachment drama. Of
course, the identity of Eric Ciaramella was never much of a secret — lots of people in D.C. knew that the former
National Security Council staffer was the reputed source for California Rep. Adam Schiff's investigation of President
Trump's July 25 phone call to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Ciaramella's name has been in many news stories
in recent months: [Examples] to cite just a couple. But CNN viewers have never heard Ciaramella identified, and Jake
Tapper evidently wants to prevent anyone else from reporting this fact, either. [...] If Tapper and his CNN colleagues want
to treat Eric Ciaramella's identity as a secret, they are free to do so. Others, however, are free not only to name
Ciaramella but also to point out that CNN is deliberately refusing to report important information relevant to the
Page and Others Tie Adam Schiff's Ukraine Hoax Suspected Whistleblower Eric Ciaramella to the Deep State Russia
Hoax. Suspected whistleblower Eric Ciaramella is suspected of being involved in both the Ukraine hoax and the
Russia hoax. More and more information supports that claim. Laura Ingraham reported why suspected whistle blower
Eric Ciaramella was so concerned about efforts to look into Obama's activities in the Ukraine. According to White House
visitor logs Eric Ciaramella was hosting the January 19, 2016 White House meeting where Ukrainian officials were told
to drop the investigation into Hunter Biden.
Paul Discusses Whistleblower Eric Ciaramella During Floor Speech. Earlier today [2/4/2020] Senator Rand Paul
delivered his remarks on impeachment from the Senate floor. During his remarks Senator Paul highlighted the real and
present danger of allowing agents within government to plot against a sitting president. Senator Paul asks the same
question he presented to Chief Justice John Roberts as the presiding officer of the Senate trial. [Video clip]
Paul: Alleged Whistleblower, Friend Plotted For Over A Year To Bring Down Trump. Sen. Rand Paul
(R-KY) explains why he thinks Chief Justice John Roberts refused to read aloud a question he submitted to the entire body of
Senators in an interview with One America's John Hines. "I didn't identify anybody or propose that anyone was the
whistleblower," Paul said. "But I did identify two Obama partisans that have worked in the National Security
Council. Sean Misko, who works for Adam Schiff, and then I also identified Eric Ciaramella. They're
friends. They worked together on the National Security Council." "There are allegations that they actually
plotted together as much as a year or two ago to say that 'we've got to bring this president down,'" Paul revealed.
Censorship Hits Facebook and the Senate. The nation's top reporters have taken a virtual oath of silence
regarding his name, even though it's an open secret inside their newsrooms. Suppressing their news instincts, they have
been unified in complying with Democratic demands to back off identifying the whistleblower and exploring his motives.
As a result, they have left large gaps in reporting on the origins of this momentous story, only the third presidential
impeachment in U.S. history. The Washington Post, which normally would own such a local story, has scarcely touched it.
Instead of doing its own deep reporting, it's assigned reporters to do media stories questioning RCI [RealClearInvestigations]
for its journalistic decision to "unmask" the whistleblower, who enjoys limited, not blanket, anonymity.
to Blame for Pelosi-Schiff Impeachment Insanity? Prior to delaying aid to Ukraine, President Trump threatened
to, or actually did, withhold aid from Pakistan, Iraq, Lebanon, El Salvador, Honduras, and Guatemala. He also
threatened Mexico with tariffs unless the Mexicans halted the caravans marching through their country. All these
demands were transmitted in the clear, and each contained the dreaded quid pro quo, but not a single Democrat eyebrow was
raised. What made the Ukrainian case different? Why did it rise to the level of impeachment where the others did
not? To Chairman Schiff, the answer was simple: the president had something to hide. This time he was
right: the president was hiding information from Russia.
Slams Schiff: Secrecy Ok for Whistleblower, But Not for Trump-Bolton Conversations? Rep. Adam Schiff
(D-Calif.), the chairman of the House intelligence committee, has released all but one of the transcribed interviews his
committee conducted privately as part of their impeachment process. At the impeachment trial on Wednesday, Republicans
asked why Schiff is still withholding the transcript of Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson, who
testified about the whistleblower and his complaint in closed, executive session on Oct. 4.
Ukrainian Official Who
Attended Jan 2016 White House Meeting on Biden/Burisma Blows Up Schiff's Narrative. This week, Fox News' Laura
Ingraham obtained several emails from the State Department regarding a previously unknown White House meeting held in January
2016. After watching Ingraham's presentation of the story, Ukrainian Embassy official Andrii Telizhenko, who had attended the
meeting, issued an exclusive statement and provided several documents which she presented to her audience on Friday night.
On May 1, 2019, New York Times reporter Ken Vogel emailed the State Department to confirm that (State Dept. official)
Elizabeth Zentos had attended the January 2016 White House meeting about "Burisma Holdings and concerns that Hunter Biden's
position with the company could complicate such efforts." Vogel wrote that the attendees included "Ukrainian prosecutors
and embassy officials as well as Eric Ciaramella from the NSC." By now, everyone who has read my posts knows that Ciaramella
is alleged to be the whistleblower who sparked the current impeachment trial of President Trump.
Eric Ciaramella is the 'Whistleblower', Then He, IG Michael Atkinson and Adam Schiff Must Be Questioned Under Oath Right
Away. The name of the man many believe to be the "whistleblower," Eric Ciaramella (EC), whose complaint
triggered the circus we've been forced to endure, continues to pop up in the most unexpected of places. As these
incidents multiply, it's becoming clearer by the day that EC, the Intelligence Community Inspector General, Michael Atkinson,
who received his "urgent" complaint, bloviator Adam Schiff and Sean Misko, EC's former colleague at the National Security
Council with whom he has a "bro-like" relationship, must all be questioned under oath immediately. If EC is the
individual who filed the complaint, then this is the greatest "hit and run" in American political history. In the last
week alone, we learned from Fox News' Laura Ingraham that EC was one of the principals in a January 2016 meeting between a
group of Ukrainian government and embassy officials and their U.S. counterparts at the White House. Contrary to
Democratic talking points, the meeting was set up because Obama Administration officials were quite concerned about Hunter
Biden's lucrative position with Burisma Holdings, a company which was under investigation at the time by the Ukrainian
government. In addition to his key role in the meeting, EC's name shows up on the White House visitor log as the person
who checked the Ukrainians into the building.
Democrats conceal testimony of 18th witness from Trump team. Democrats clamoring for more witnesses at
President Trump's impeachment trial are concealing one of those questioned in the House investigation, President Trump's
defense team says. Rep. Adam B. Schiff, California Democrat, and other impeachment managers repeatedly talk about
the 17 witnesses interviewed during the House's secretive depositions. But they do not mention an 18th witness, Michael
Atkinson, the intelligence community's inspector general who has firsthand knowledge of the origins of the whistleblower
complaint that led to the impeachment. Members of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence who conducted
the interview are barred from disclosing details. But Republicans on the committee said the testimony should be heard
at the president's impeachment trial in the Senate.
impeachment witness Vindman unloads on Blackburn as Dems wrap 3rd day of Trump's trial. As the third day of the
ongoing impeachment trial of President Trump wrapped up in the Senate chamber, most of the drama was elsewhere —
with one witness for the Democrats accusing a Republican senator of "defamation" and "slander" after she questioned his
patriotism and implicated him in a scheme to take down Trump from inside the White House. The off-field spat began
Thursday evening [1/23/2020] on Twitter, when Tennessee GOP Sen. Marsha Blackburn quoted the commanding officer of
Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman as saying that Vindman was a "political activist in uniform." Vindman, a National
Security Council official, testified during House Democrats' impeachment inquiry last year that Trump's Ukraine dealings left
him in a state of "shock," and Democrats were quoting from Vindman's remarks during the Senate trial on Thursday.
Vindman has denied knowing the identity of the whistleblower who flagged Trump's fateful July 25 phone call with Ukraine's
president — a claim that Republicans have questioned, because under cross-examination, Vindman apparently admitted
to leaking the contents of Trump's call to the whistleblower.
Was Overheard in '17 Discussing With Ally How to Remove Trump. Barely two weeks after Donald Trump took office,
Eric Ciaramella — the CIA analyst whose name was recently linked in a tweet by the president and mentioned by
lawmakers as the anonymous "whistleblower" who touched off Trump's impeachment — was overheard in the White House
discussing with another staffer how to remove the newly elected president from office, according to former colleagues.
Nunes Discusses Sketchy Issues Surrounding ICIG Michael Atkinson and Origination of the "Whistle-blower"
Complaint. House Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Devin Nunes appears with Maria Bartiromo to discuss two
very important issues. The first is the origination of the "whistle-blower" complaint and new issues surrounding
Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson. The second important subject is the background of newly
installed FISA Court monitor, David Kris, to oversee the FBI reform promises. CTH has some explosive new information
which has been shared with Mr. Nunes on both issues; but we start with the interview and ICIG Michael Atkinson.
slams IG probing Trump-Ukraine whistleblower case: 'Origins of this investigation are shady and don't make sense'. Michael
Atkinson, inspector general for the U.S. intelligence community, needs to be completely forthright about inconsistencies in a key form
related to the Ukraine whistleblower's complaint, U.S. Rep. Devin Nunes said Wednesday night [1/8/2020]. Nunes, a California
Republican who serves as ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, said on "The Ingraham Angle" that his GOP colleagues on the
panel wrote to Atkinson in September, complaining about relevant forms that didn't match, and that the investigator responded in "an
inadequate way" a week later. "From the time that the whistleblower first came forward, to the IG, where the forms didn't match, it
wasn't urgent, didn't have any firsthand knowledge, the form later changed, then it was backdated, ... then we had to hear from the
whistleblower and then we didn't have to hear from the whistleblower," Nunes said.
the Goods on Schiff. Real whistleblowers deserve to be treated like heroes. But the man identified as the
whistleblower by Judicial Watch and many media accounts — Eric Ciaramella — is no hero. To
dignify Ciaramella with the term "whistleblower" misrepresents what he allegedly did. Let's say he filed what is
technically called a whistleblower complaint. He had no firsthand knowledge of Trump's controversial July 25 phone call
or motivations. Every allegation in the complaint begins with "I learned from multiple U.S. officials," or "multiple
officials told me" or "officials with direct knowledge informed me." Just gossip. He never names any sources.
Ciaramella acted as the anti-Trumpers' frontman. As for courage, there's not an ounce. He's cowering from public view.
Adam Schiff doesn't want anyone talking to the whistleblower. The truth behind House Intelligence Chairman Adam
Schiff's role in engineering President Trump's impeachment may soon come out. Judicial Watch, a nonprofit group
promoting government transparency, is suing to get the whistleblower's e-mails. That's good news. Because no
matter what comes of Trump's Senate trial, Schiff should be held accountable for his devious methods. The public also
needs the truth about the so-called whistleblower. Real whistleblowers deserve to be treated like heroes. But
Eric Ciaramella — the man Judicial Watch and many media accounts have identified as the whistleblower and who
doesn't deny it — is no hero.
watchdog sues for alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella's communication. A conservative watchdog is suing the
CIA and the Justice Department for the communications of a CIA analyst who is alleged to be the Ukraine whistleblower.
Judicial Watch said Thursday it had filed Freedom of Information Act lawsuits against the agency and the department for the
communications of Eric Ciaramella. The watchdog filed FOIA requests in November to the Justice Department seeking
communications between Ciaramella and former FBI agent Peter Strzok, former FBI attorney Lisa Page, former FBI Deputy
Director Andrew McCabe, and special counsel Robert Mueller's office. It also filed a request with the CIA for
Ciaramella's emails between June 1, 2016, and Nov. 12, 2019.
Tech Self-Censorship Over 'Whistleblower' Marks Death Of Free Press In The United States. It would seem
extraordinary for the world's leading democracy to allow an election to be overturned based on the actions of a rogue CIA
employee working with the opposition — and even stranger not to be told his name. Moreover, the
"whistleblower" himself admitted that he did not have first-hand information of the events he had described. It would
seem an urgent matter of national security, and public interest, to know who was feeing him information — whether
it was an enemy, foreign or domestic. If the hysteria over Russian influence in the 2016 election had any useful
lesson, it was that we ought to be curious about where information comes from, and why. Yet the media have not only
ignored the "whistleblower's" name, but they have also actively suppressed it. That includes the conservative
media. Earlier this year, I appeared on a morning show in Los Angeles to discuss the impeachment inquiry. The
moment I mentioned the name of the "whistleblower," the hosts ended the interview.
Giuliani: Yovanovitch Was Part Of The Cover-Up, She Had To Be Ousted. "Trump was simply asking new
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky — in a July phone call — to investigate crimes at the "highest
levels" of both Kiev and Washington," Rudy Giuliani, a personal attorney for President Trump, told Laura Ingraham on "The
Ingraham Angle." "So, he is being impeached for doing the right thing as president of the United States," he
said. Giuliani told Laura Ingraham on "The Ingraham Angle" that he helped forced out Yovanovitch because she was
corrupt and obstructing the investigation into Ukraine and the Bidens.
Impeachment Show Trial. Adam Schiff went beyond hearsay to outright falsehood. Speaking on the floor of
Congress, he reported that President Trump said to President Zelensky, "I want you to dig up dirt on my opponent and lots of
it." The President said nothing of the kind. Schiff later claimed it was a "parody." This is the same Adam Schiff
who said he had incontrovertible evidence that President Trump colluded with Russia. The only conclusion supported by
evidence is that Adam Schiff is a pathological liar. Democrats also violated the principle that the accused has a right
to a vigorous defense. The earliest hearings were closed to Republicans. Information from those inquiries was
selectively leaked to the press. Depositions were taken in secret. Rep. Andy Biggs, Chairman of the House
Freedom Caucus, compared the sessions to Soviet secret hearings. He proposed a resolution on the House floor to condemn
and censure Schiff, but of course House Democrats tabled the proposal.
apoplectic after Louie Gohmert dares to call alleged whistleblower by name at hearing. Democrats are feigning
outrage after Republican Congressman Louie Gohmert called the alleged Ukraine "whistleblower" by name during a televised
House Judiciary Committee impeachment hearing last night. Gohmert dropped the alleged whistleblower's name during his
opening statement, when he said Eric Ciaramella and others should be questioned as fact witnesses. Gohmert said:
"Abuse of power [and] obstruction of Congress — the very things the majority has done in preventing us from having
the witnesses that could shed light on this. We needed to hear from those witnesses — people like Sean Misko,
Abigail Grace, Eric Ciaramella, Devin Archer, Joe Biden, Nellie Ohr, Alexandra Chalupa — and so many others."
the likely whistleblower — and the questions he should answer. [Scroll down] The whistleblower
is most likely CIA analyst Eric Ciaramella. Journalist Paul Sperry reported his name in late October, saying that
sources inside the closed-door impeachment hearings identified him. Ciaramella has put out no statement denying these
reports. Whistleblower lawyers refuse to confirm or deny Ciaramella is their man. His identity is apparently the
worst-kept secret of the Washington press corps. In a sign of how farcical this has become, Rep. Louie Gohmert
(R-Texas) said his name as part of a series of names during a live hearing Wednesday night aired on television. He
never called him the whistleblower, just said he was someone Republicans thought should testify, yet Democrats angrily
denounced the "outing." If you don't know the man's name, how do you know the man's name? Politico's Jack Shafer has
eloquently argued that the press should name the whistleblower. It is not against the law — whistleblower
protections are to prevent retaliation in the workplace and apply to his superiors, not the media.
lawmaker demands alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella testify. Republican Rep. Louie Gohmert said the
alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella should testify in the House's impeachment proceedings. He made the demand during
the House Judiciary Committee's hearing on Wednesday night regarding the articles of impeachment against President
Trump. Gohmert was railing against how the Democrats have handled the investigation and subsequent hearings, and he
noted that there were several individuals he thought should testify about the situation. "A vague abuse of power,
obstruction of Congress, the very things the majority has done in preventing us from having the witnesses that could shed
light on this, not opinion, but fact witnesses. We needed to hear from those witnesses," Gohmert said.
'Whistleblower' and the Politicization of Intelligence. The whistleblower. A figure of great controversy,
whose actions, manifested in an 11-page report submitted to the Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) on August 12
alleging wrongdoing on the part of the president of the United States, jump-started an ongoing impeachment process targeting
Donald Trump that has divided the American body politic as no other issue in contemporary time. His identity has been
cloaked in a shroud of anonymity which has proven farcical, given that his name is common knowledge throughout the
Washington-based national security establishment in whose ranks he continues to serve. While Trump publicly calls for
the identity of the whistleblower to be revealed, the mainstream media has played along with the charade of confidentiality,
and Congress continues to pretend his persona is a legitimate national security secret, even as several on-line publications
have printed it, along with an extensive document trail sufficient to corroborate that the named man is, in fact, the elusive
whistleblower. There is no legitimate reason for the whistleblower's identity to remain a secret. The Democratic
chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Representative Adam Schiff, (D-CA) has cited statutory protections that simply
do not exist while using his authority as chairman to prohibit any probe by his Republican colleagues designed to elicit
information about the whistleblower's identity.
Impeachment Poll Shows Pelosi and Schiff May Be Setting Democrats up for a 2020 Election Disaster. In spite of
what the national media and Democrats have been saying about voter support for impeaching President Trump, the writing has
been on the wall for weeks suggesting they're on a path to disaster come election time. A new Politico-Morning Consult
poll bears that out, but first, let's look at what other revealing polls have said over the last few weeks. Roughly two
weeks before the public impeachment inquiry hearings began, a Suffolk University poll showed that when it comes to the
impeachment issue, the devil is in the details. In that poll, 31% of those surveyed believed the July call between
Trump and Ukrainian President Zelensky was not a big deal. 21% said that even though they felt the call was wrong, they
didn't feel he should be impeached over it, meaning a total of 52% of the 1,000 registered voters surveyed believed Trump had
not committed an impeachable offense with the call.
hired former NSC colleague of alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella the day after Trump-Ukraine call. House
Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff hired a former National Security Council aide who worked with alleged Ukraine
whistleblower Eric Ciaramella at the NSC during the Obama and Trump administrations the day after the phone call between
President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. It was previously reported by the Washington Examiner that
public records indicated Sean Misko, 37, started work on Schiff's committee in August as a professional staff member. A
specific start date was not available until this week when the latest congressional quarterly disbursements were released.
The new records show that Misko's official hire date was July 26. Misko was the director for the Gulf States at the
NSC between 2015 until the first half of 2018.
Says He Knows The Reason Schiff Won't Release ICIG Michael Atkinson's Transcript. Republican Texas Rep. John
Ratcliffe hinted Saturday [11/30/2019] at the reason he believes House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff won't release
Michael Atkinson's transcript. Ratcliffe suggested in a tweet that Atkinson, the Intelligence Community Inspector General,
might have revealed information about a possible connection between the whistleblower and members of Schiff's staff.
Motivations Part 1 — the Schiff-Ukraine Connection. For the past week or so, I've been digging
through old news articles, looking for a connection between Rep. Adam Schiff and Ukraine. Schiff has been at the
tip of the spear trying to prod President Trump out of office since the day Trump was elected, but when Trump started talking
with newly elected Ukrainian President Zelensky, Schiff's behavior became even more weird, and that raised a red flag for
me. Schiff's behavior indicates that he's hiding something, and that he wants to keep it hidden by obfuscating.
Let's start with two irrefutable facts: [#1] Ukraine's new president ran for office on a campaign of rooting out
corruption. [#2] After Trump and Zelensky talked with one another on the phone, Schiff read a wildly fabricated
transcript of the call. It needs to be emphasized that Schiff created this false narrative even AFTER the actual
transcript was released. How crazy does one have to be to do that?
Zeldin: Here's Why 'Adam in Wonderland' Won't Release Mark Sandy Transcript. When asked by NBC's Chuck
Todd why he won't call the whistleblower to testify, [Adam] Schiff responded, "We had a deep interest in having the
whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything the whistleblower complaint said
with witnesses that had first-hand information." The truth is Schiff has no first-hand information. He is
referring to testimony from U.S. Ambassador to the E.U. Gordon Sondland. During questioning by Rep. Mike Turner
(R-OH), Sondland admitted his statement that there had been a quid pro quo was his presumption. This shows that the
Democrats' most important piece of evidence is not evidence at all. Presumptions are opinions, they cannot be
considered first-hand information.
Adam Schiff Staffer Linked to Burisma-Backed Think Tank, 'Close Friends' with Alleged 'Whistleblower'. Yet
another staffer for Rep. Adam Schiff served as a fellow for the Atlantic Council, a think tank that is funded by and
works in partnership with Burisma, the natural gas company at the center of allegations regarding Joe Biden and his son,
Hunter Biden. Sean Misko has been described as "close friends" with Eric Ciaramella, whom Real Clear Investigations
suggests is the likely so-called whistleblower. Misko reportedly joined Schiff's staff at the House Intelligence
Committee in August — the same month the so-called whistleblower's complaint was filed after first reportedly
interfacing with a staffer for Schiff's office. Misko in 2015 was a yearlong "Millennium Fellow" at the Burisma-funded
Atlantic Council, which has been under the microscope for its ties to other individuals associated with the Trump impeachment inquiry.
The Hatred that
Fuels Impeachment. Neither the NeverTrump Right nor the Progressive Left has yet offered a coherent defense of
their de facto, three-year-long singular effort to delegitimize and ultimately remove Trump from office before the
2020 election. We are now in the midst of a systematic effort to impeach a president on the basis of a thought
crime. Trump's purported quid pro quo sin was issuing a temporary hold on military assistance to Ukraine that
supposedly transcended legitimate worries about rampant corruption — to include specifically investigating the
suspicious behavior of a corrupt Ukrainian oil company and the compromised relationship of former Vice President Joe Biden
and his son around it.
Refuses to Commit to Testifying in Senate Impeachment Trial. On Sunday's [11/24/2019] broadcast of CNN's "State
of the Union," Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) refused to say he would testify in an impeachment trial of President Donald Trump
in the Senate. When asked if he would be willing to testify in the Senate, Schiff said, "There is nothing to testify
about. I think if the president or his allies in the Senate persist, it means they are not serious about what they are doing."
May Regret This Dance When Republicans Call the Tune. As the Democrat impeachment farce concluded its meltdown
in the House Intelligence Committee this week, it's clear Representative Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and company think we're
idiots. Schiff claims he doesn't know the identity of the political-operative-masquerading-as-a-"whistleblower" while
other Democrats insist that hearsay is sometimes more relevant than first-hand accounts. (Ponder that one in the context
of proposed red-flag gun laws. Who in his right mind would ever give these people the power over their natural rights?)
All the while, witness after witness made it clear there was no quid pro quo, no bribery, no nothing of
anything at all. Just a lot of discomfort with President Trump's departure from the "interagency consensus."
State Media Whistleblower Double Standard. Calling Eric Ciaramella a "whistleblower" gives him a certain
legitimacy. [...] Ciaramella is not a whistleblower. He is actually a charlatan. There is an endless supply of
Eric Ciaramellas in the federal government. Many of them call themselves the Resistance or members of the
Interagency. Members of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau like to refer to themselves as Dumbledore's
Army. Donald Trump is aware of this. He knows how the Deep State operates and possibly structured his phone
conversation to the Ukrainian president to expose members of the Deep State.
'Spartacus' Needed to Out Whistleblower. [Scroll down] His name, as I and others have written on these
pages, is Eric Ciaramella. He is the accuser that President Trump has been denied his due process right to
confront. He is intimately connected with another deep state agent, DNC operative Alexandra Chalupa, a key fact witness
deeply involved in the coup being hidden by Schiff. He is the CIA operative or mole detailed to the White House as a
John Brennan plant who is not a genuine whistleblower and, despite what Schiff says, is not entitled to anonymity under the
whistleblower law or by the Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) statutes. [...] Naming the whistleblower's name
is not illegal. Keeping it secret is not required by law or statute. Sen. Rand Paul named Ciaramella
publically a week ago, and has yet to feel the handcuffs.
is surgery with a butterknife. [Scroll down] "The Democrats promised the whistleblower's testimony —
in fact, they told us we need to speak with the whistleblower." Now they will not present him. The Democrat excuse is
the whistleblower has to be kept secret because he is getting death threats, which is odd since no one knows who he is.
Not even Schiff or Vindman. Or so they say. Impeachment is a prosecution and it should be handled with the utmost care
and research. Before making their case to the public, Democrats needed to convince at least one of their Republican colleagues
to join them.
Adam Schiff Connected to Both Companies Named in $7.4 Billion Burisma-US-Ukraine Corruption Case. As reported
on Wednesday [11/20/2019] the head of Burisma Holdings was indicted this week in Ukraine! Ukrainian Prosecutor General
indicted Burisma owner Nikolai Zlochevsky. The claim alleges that Hunter Biden and his partners received $16.5 million
over several years for their 'services' in Ukraine. Vice President Joe Biden's son Hunter Biden took a lucrative post
on the Burisma Board in 2014. Hunter Biden was making millions from the corrupt Ukrainian oil and gas company.
Trump Never Impounded Even One Dollar from Ukraine Aid. The president needs better legal counsel, as do the
American people. The current impeachment illusion is based on a pandemic mirage. The nation has been hypnotized
to believe that $391.5 million for Ukraine was held back, frozen, slow-walked, canceled, or subject to a nefarious threat by
Trump. Wake up, America. Every penny of Ukraine monetary aid, the alleged carrot dangled before Zelensky, was
spent on time, according to law, before, during, and after the July 25 call. The Department of Defense certified
Ukraine reforms in a May 23, 2019 letter from John C. Rood to Congress, but this certification was only necessary to
release the second $125-million tranche. Read the letter. The tables therein refer to that $125 million
as "Tranche 2." So what happened to the first $125 million? It was already spent on Ukraine before
the July 25 phone call with Zelensky.
Fact Check by WaPo yields Three Pinocchios. Schiff's
claim that the whistleblower has a 'statutory right' to anonymity. Does the whistleblower who filed a complaint
about President Trump have a "statutory right" to remain anonymous, as Schiff claims? It's not a right spelled out in
any statute. But national security experts warn that disclosing the whistleblower's identity could expose him to danger
and retribution, and chill whistleblowing in general.
the Record Straight on the Value of US Military Aid to Ukraine. U.S. military aid is a luxury, not a necessity,
for Ukrainian combat operations to counter Russian aggression. From what I've seen, the country is perfectly capable of
fighting its own war — with or without the American military aid. However, recent news reports and social
media commentaries highlight the fact that Ukraine's armed forces suffered at least 13 combat deaths during the 55 days
in which the Trump administration withheld nearly $400 million in military aid from mid-July to mid-September.
to Subpoena Whistleblower, Hunter Biden, Alexandra Chalupa. Republicans intend to subpoena testimony and
documents related to the anonymous whistleblower, Hunter Biden, and Democratic National Committee contractor Alexandra
Chalupa, according to a letter they sent to House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA). "Although Speaker
Pelosi promised that Democrats would 'treat the President with fairness,' you have repeatedly prevented Republicans from
fully and fairly examining issues central to the Democrats' 'impeachment inquiry,'" House Intelligence Committee Ranking
Member Devin Nunes (R-CA) and Oversight and Reform Committee Ranking Member Jim Jordan (R-OH) wrote in a November 20,
Alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella shakes hands with Barack Obama in Oval Office. A year after Ukraine
official and alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella left President Trump's White House, a picture of him shaking Barack
Obama's hand was published on a close friend's wedding website. The Oval Office photograph, obtained by the Washington
Examiner, is circulating among Trump allies who consider it evidence that the alleged whistleblower is biased against Trump
and had partisan motivations when he filed an Aug. 12 complaint that sparked impeachment proceedings. In the
photograph, a smiling Ciaramella, then Ukraine director on the National Security Council at the White House, is shown shaking
senator says 'something going on' with whistleblower lawyer's anti-Trump history. Republican Sen. Ron
Johnson of Wisconsin said past statements the whistleblower's attorney made are evidence that the impeachment investigation
against President Trump is a partisan attack. Johnson appeared on NBC's Meet the Press with host Chuck Todd on
Sunday [11/17/2019] to defend the president against impeachment proceedings kicked off by a whistleblower complaint.
Johnson pointed to the whistleblower's attorney, Mark Zaid, as evidence the whistleblower may be motivated by partisanship
and not merely concern for the country's interests.
Given Leaked Sealed Transcripts from Friday Depositions. Representative Jim Jordan appears on CBS Face The
Nation to discuss the ongoing impeachment fiasco. Ms. Brennan struggles to define a new journalistic concept for
"first-hand" information as she claims David Holmes, who claims to have overheard half of a phone conversation that two other
people were having, is a "first-hand" witness. Jordan points out that Ms. Brennan is quoting from a seal
transcript given to her by Adam Schiff that has not been released.
Seditious Conspiracy — Lt. Col. Vindman, CIA "Whistleblower" Source #1, Shaped False Summary of April
Trump-Zelensky Phone Call. Amid increased calls from House Republicans to force the testimony of the CIA
"whistleblower", today the Washington Post, the primary outlet for CIA misinformation and public relations, began shaping the
"whistle-blower" as a hero. Because the overall effort involves multiple parts of the deep state apparatus, to see
through the construction it is important to note which media outlet holds equity for agency talking points within the
coup. The Washington Post is primary PR for the CIA and IC writ large. The New York Times is primary PR for the
FBI; and CNN is primary PR for the State Dept. This pattern has been consistent throughout.
whistleblower may have liaised with Vindman over Trump call. The whistleblower whose complaint about President
Trump's communications with Ukraine launched House impeachment proceedings was still attending White House meetings recently
and may have spoken to Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman prior to filing the complaint, according to the Washington
Post. On Saturday [11/16/2019], the outlet published details about the steps a CIA analyst took to blow the whistle
after the president urged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky during a July 25 phone call to start an investigation into
former Vice President Joe Biden, who is also leading the pack of 2020 Democrats. Notably, the Post was clear that
the whistleblower is male.
Impeachment Clock. Adam Schiff's impeachment inquiry is incoherent. Given the impossibility of a
senatorial conviction, the only strategy is to taint the president with the brand of impeachment and weaken him in the 2020
election. [...] Once Trump released the transcript of his July 25th call with Ukrainian president Zelensky, the nation
learned that the Schiff's gold-standard whistleblower was no such thing. Instead, he seems a rank partisan and sloppy
leaker whose machinations and background are already boomeranging back on those who put him up to this present circus.
Democrats Have The Country On A Slippery Slope. The fake "whistleblower's name — Eric Ciamerella — has been
known for a long time, but not officially. Now it is official. Senator Rand Paul has officially released his
name. Funny, isn't it, that only the Republicans want Ciamerella to testify. The Democrats won't hear of
it. If the American people are paying attention, the Democrats are in trouble. When Russiagate fizzled out on
them, Adam Schiff (D,CA) orchestrated a fake "whistleblower" who the Democrats cannot risk putting on the stand to testify.
The Democrats' focus shifted to sleazy State Department types who could offer nothing but second or third hand hearsay
followed by a hearsay second telephone call that cannot be confirmed.
silly sanctification of Marie Yovanovitch. [Scroll down] The Mueller investigation and this Ukraine
nonsense was and remains an attempted cover-up. And as cover-ups go, this one has gone very badly for the cover-uppers.
Brennan, Clapper, Comey et. al. were bad enough. The current crop of wannabe-impeachers are like the Three Stooges.
Schiff has bungled his bit of Intel committee tyranny so badly, he's recruiting Trump voters by the thousands. Like the FSOs
and the Comey crowd, Schiff thinks he is smarter than the American public, that we are easily fooled, but in fact, the American public
is much smarter than these swamp-dwellers. They are [much] smarter than Schiff. He has made an utter fool of himself these
past weeks. Letting him chair the Intel committee was the biggest mistake of Pelosi's career.
Reagan Attorney General Ed Meese Blasts Dems' Impeachment Inquiry And 'Phony' Whistleblower. Former Attorney
General Ed Meese, who served under President Ronald Reagan, called into question the legitimacy of the whistleblower at the
center of the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump in an exclusive interview with the Daily Caller.
Meese, who now serves as the Ronald Reagan Distinguished Fellow Emeritus at The Heritage Foundation, told the Caller he has
seen no evidence that warrants impeachment of the president, and criticized the largely closed-door process being conducted
by House Democrats.
Foreign Minister: U.S. Aid, Investigations Were 'Never' Linked. Ukrainian foreign minister Vadym
Prystaiko said Thursday [11/14/2019] that U.S. Ambassador to the E.U. Gordon Sondland had "never" linked U.S. aid to Ukrainian
investigations of the 2016 elections or the Biden's role in stopping a probe of Burisma. Prystaiko spoke the day after
the first public hearings in the House Intelligence Committee as part of the "impeachment inquiry," where two witnesses said
they came to believe there had been such a link — though only some time after Politico reported on August 28
that aid had been held up by the Trump administration.
hearings! Is that all they've got? Something is manifestly wrong with Adam Schiff. [...] He does not,
apparently cannot, differentiate between the truth and lies. [...] For all who had not previously realized this about Schiff,
Wednesday's [11/13/2019] hearing was a wake-up call. The man is demented. He outright lied when he said he did
not know who the not-whistleblower is! Everyone knows who the not-whistleblower is. Eric Ciaramella.
He's a longtime, deep state connected Democrat, anti-Trump activist whose own lawyer tweeted in 2017 that "the coup has
started." He is aligned with Brennan and Biden and he is still employed by the CIA! He is part of the cabal that
set out to impeach Trump from the moment he was elected when they knew they would have to cover up their crimes against the
Trump campaign. That Schiff thinks he can lie so blatantly and get away with it is a sign of serious mental illness.
alleges Trump-Ukraine whistleblower may be soliciting illicit donations. A newly filed complaint to the
Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) alleges that the whistleblower whose allegations touched off House Democrats'
impeachment inquiry may have violated federal law by indirectly soliciting more than a quarter-million dollars from mostly
anonymous sources via a GoFundMe page. The complaint, which was filed last week and obtained by Fox News, alleged the
donations from roughly 6,000 individuals "clearly constitute" gifts to a current intelligence official that may be restricted
because of the employee's official position pursuant to 5 CFR 2635.203 and other statutes. To date, the
GoFundMe has raised over $227,000.
reasons why this impeachment 'inquiry' is really a coup. [#2] False whistleblowers: The "whistleblower"
is no whistleblower by any common definition of the noun. He has no incriminating documents, no information at
all. He doesn't even have firsthand evidence of wrongdoing. Instead, the whistleblower relied on secondhand
water-cooler gossip about a leaked presidential call. Even his mangled version of the call didn't match that of
official transcribers. He wasn't disinterested but had a long history of partisanship. He was a protégé
of many of Trump's most adamant opponents, including Susan Rice, John Brennan and Joe Biden. He did not follow protocol by
going first to the inspector general but instead caucused with the staff of Rep. Adam Schiff's impeachment inquiry.
Neither the whistleblower nor his doppelganger, Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, was bothered by the activities of the
Bidens or by the Obama decision not to arm Ukraine. Their outrage, in other words, was not about Ukraine but over Trump.
Business — ICIG Atkinson Receives Ethics Complaint Against CIA 'Whistleblower', Goes to Schiff Basement for
Talks. This is interesting because it was reported today that ICIG Atkinson has now received an ethics
complaint about a GoFundMe account set up by the CIA 'whistleblower' attorney, Mark S. Zaid, to finance the ongoing efforts
of CIA operative Eric Ciaramella. The dirty dealing is getting thick. Attorney Mark Zaid has claimed to be
working pro-bono for his CIA client. Meanwhile Adam Schiff is threatening anyone and everyone about keeping the CIA
client hidden and anonymous; and the media is all-in with efforts to support the protection. A narrative created by a
CIA operative favorable to the coup. So what exactly is this current $228,000 for?
Invitation to an
Impeachment. [Scroll down] With each passing week, though, it has become ever more clear that what begins
today is a hearing of the witnesses only the Democrats deem pertinent. The House majority is eager to protect the
whistleblower, who refuses to face his or her accuser — or the American people. But only the
whistleblower. Protestations by other officers of the executive branch, it discounts. It may be within the powers
of the House majority to restrict the witnesses to those who will help the prosecution. It may also, though, explain
why the opening of this supposedly historic hearing failed to make Page A1 of the Times. It has become a foregone
conclusion that the House is going to impeach.
Russia and Ukraine Scandals Expose a True One. There is a striking symmetry between the charge that Donald
Trump's 2016 campaign colluded with Russia to sway the outcome of the election and the Democrats' current effort to impeach
President Trump. Both involve our relations with countries that Americans do not think of very often, but over which
the elites obsess. The rhetoric in each case is crafted carefully to turn conservatives' patriotic instincts jiu
jitsu-style against the president. And both cases feature overwrought rhetoric that transforms the ordinary and the
unremarkable into "high crimes and misdemeanors."
thickens the day after Mollie Hemingway outed so-called whistleblower on Fox News. [Scroll down] Sorry,
Howie. The so-called whistleblower's name has been more than "bandied about" by "some partisan sites." For
example, Real Clear Investigations (RCI) is a reputable, non-partisan news and aggregation site that is part of the RealClearFoundation,
a 501(c)(3) non-profit. On October 30, RCI published a detailed article by Paul Sperry that named career CIA analyst
Eric Ciaramella, 33, as "the anonymous 'whistleblower.'" Subsequent media reports, including [another] one published
November 6 in the Washington Examiner, have fleshed out Ciaramella's background as a deeply embedded partisan Democrat.
impeachment all about the SCOTUS? The Democrats continue to embarrass themselves in their effort to remove
President Trump from office. Adam Schiff, the face of their crusade, is an incompetent fool who never learned the first
rule of holes. He keeps digging. He interrogates his chosen witnesses in secret, refuses to let the Republicans
ask certain questions; he orders the witnesses not to answer questions he does not like. For the public hearings he is
allowing the Republicans no witnesses and ordered them not to even bring up the so-called whistleblower. To do so
would of course implicate Schiff himself and his underhanded, illegal manipulation of the process to jump-start this
nonsensical inquiry over a phone call during which there was nothing inappropriate said by President Trump or President
Zelensky. Schiff knows this of course but assumes the rest of us are ignorant boobs incapable of noticing his abject
misdirection, lunacy and malignity.
DC Game Is Rigged to Favor the Deep State. The Trump-Russia witch hunt is an egregious example of the power of
the state being abused for partisan political purposes. That failed to deliver the goal of deposing the president, and
may even backfire as the investigations into it complete and there is a possibility of indictments for some of the
conspirators. Having come at the president and missed, they decided to redouble their efforts, so we come to the
impeachment inquiry currently operating in full kangaroo court fashion.
Bribery Charge Against Trump Won't Stick — 'It Fails to Meet an Essential Element'. Monday [11/11/2019],
during an appearance on Fox News Channel's "The Story," Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) dismissed a claim of bribery put forth against
President Donald Trump in response to Fox News contributor Andrew Napolitano. Gaetz argued such a case would lack what he
deemed an "essential element" to meet the standard of bribery. "I would disagree that bribery would be applicable for this
reason: For bribery to have been committed, you have to be asking someone to do something that they would not otherwise do
with President Zelinsky, who ran an entire campaign on rooting out corruption," Gaetz said.
Brooks: 'Whistleblower' a Spy Acting on Behalf of the Democratic Party, Joe Biden. During an appearance on
Huntsville, AL radio's WVNN on Monday, Rep. Mo Brooks (R-AL) gave his thoughts on a claim made by former United Nations
ambassador Nikki Haley alleging then-White House chief of staff John Kelly and then-Secretary of State Rex Tillerson sought
to undermine the will of President Donald Trump. Brooks chalked the saga up to "palace intrigue," which he said was
common in presidential administrations, particularly in the Trump administration, given the variety of worldviews Trump has
brought into the White House. However, Brooks said where the real threat lies is in "people like" the so-called
whistleblower, who Brooks deemed to be a spy for Democrats.
Trump impeachment inquiry is already in big trouble. The clown show known as an "impeachment inquiry" is
getting more comical and hapless by the day. Consider the latest remark from the circus master himself, California
Rep. Adam Schiff, (think Bozo, not Pennywise). The Democratic chairman of the House Intelligence Committee says he
doesn't want Republicans turning the impeachment proceedings into a "sham." The hilarious irony is lost on no one.
Schiff has already managed to accomplish it all on his own. At first, Schiff wanted the faux "whistleblower" who triggered
the impeachment farce to testify. Then, suddenly, he didn't. What changed? In the interim, evidence emerged that
Schiff and/or his staff colluded with the "whistleblower" before the complaint was ever filed and then lied about it, earning
Schiff "Four Pinocchios" from The Washington Post.
impeachment fraud: 'I'd take a flamethrower to this place!' Why Pelosi ever gave Schiff any power over
anything, let alone the Intel Committee, is a mystery. Surely, she is embarrassed by his fascist tactics in service of
his obsession. But then again, perhaps she is not. Who knows what goes on in her addle-pated, Botoxed
brain? Is she, like Schiff, morally and intellectually challenged? They are both making fools of themselves.
[...] Is it possible she has lost all touch with reality, that she thinks Schiff and his Deep State cohorts can convince
enough Republicans to abandon the most successful president since Reagan? Hard to believe, but possible.
Dan Bishop Names Alleged Impeachment 'Whistleblower': 'He's Not Voldemort'. Rep. Dan Bishop (R-NC) became
the first member of Congress to publicly name the alleged "whistleblower," whose second-hand complaint sparked the Democrats'
impeachment inquiry, on Twitter Monday evening [11/11/2019]. Bishop on Monday responded to a tweet from an individual
who suggested that the GOP refrain from using the term "whistleblower," instead referring to him as "the leaker" or "the
operative" or "the deep state spy in the White House." The North Carolina congressman said he agreed "100%," noting
that he refuses "to cower before the authoritarian intimidation campaign."
Mystery about C*aramella and Vindman. I was chatting with Terry, my writing partner, this morning. He was
in the Intelligence Community for years, as was I; Terry on the analysis side, me in collection and later as a computer
security researcher. [...] Now, Terry is a Democrat, pretty liberal, not at all impressed with Trump. But we were
talking about Eric Ciaramella who was fired from the White House staff because he was leaking confidential information to the
media. According to all the sources, he then returned to the CIA, where he currently works. Which is, frankly,
odd. How, exactly, do you lose a job for security violations and return to the CIA? One would normally lose one's
clearance, and even janitors and cafeteria workers at CIA are cleared.
Impeachment Pantomime. [Scroll down] No wonder no one in Washington will name this phantom in plain
sight. The impeachment probe starts to take on a certain reek. It starts to look as if contempt for Trump takes
precedence over democratic process — a dangerous priority. Sperry quotes Fred Fleitz, a former National
Security Council official, thus: "Everyone knows who he is. CNN knows. The Washington Post knows.
The New York Times knows. Congress knows. The White house knows.... They're hiding him because
of his political bias." Here we come to another question. If everyone knows the whistleblower's identity, why have
the corporate media declined to name him? There can be but one answer to this question: If Ciaramella's identity
were publicized and his professional record exposed, the Ukrainegate narrative would instantly collapse into a second-rate
vaudeville act — farce by any other name, although "hoax" might do, even if Trump has made the term his own.
Graham: I Will Call Adam Schiff to Testify in the Senate. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) told Fox News'
Sean Hannity on Wednesday evening [11/13/2019] that he will call Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) to testify in the Senate if the
House impeaches President Donald Trump. Graham added that he would not allow a trial of President Donald Trump in the
Senate based on hearsay evidence alone, and without testimony from the "whistleblower."
Schiff says 'nyet' to GOP witnesses. House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff is taking his
"Soviet-style" impeachment to another level. After first setting the House rules to allow himself alone to say which
witnesses can appear before his committee hearings, now going public, he's now vetoing one by one pretty much every witness
being called by the GOP to present some kind of defense of President Trump.
whistleblower Eric Ciaramella had extensive access in Trump White House. Eric Ciaramella, the alleged Ukraine
whistleblower, was long suspected of deliberately attempting to damage President Trump's foreign policy from the inside and
had access to policy information far beyond his regional expertise, according to former National Security Council
officials. Ciaramella, 33, a career CIA analyst, was Ukraine director on the NSC toward the end of the Obama
administration and stayed there during the first few months of the Trump administration, when he was acting senior director
for European and Russian affairs and then special assistant to Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster, who was Trump's national
security adviser, until he left the White House in summer 2017.
have a Colonel Vindman problem. House Democrats conducted their impeachment interviews in secret, but
Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman still emerged as star of the show. [...] Vindman has not yet been scheduled to appear
before the Democrats' public impeachment hearings. When that happens, he will undoubtedly again play a prominent
role. But there will be a difference. The public now has a transcript of Vindman's deposition. And those
who have taken the trouble to read the 340-page document will have a different picture of Vindman's testimony than the one
presented in early media reports.
Talks: Kevin McCarthy vs Maria Bartiromo. House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy appears on Sunday Morning
Futures with Maria Bartiromo to discuss the ongoing details within the legislative impeachment process. As part of his
remarks Leader McCarthy states: "this is a calculated coup orchestrated by Adam Schiff" ... [Video clip]
Republicans MUST Subpoena Eric Ciaramella. [Scroll down] Even most people who hate the president know
it's a farce. They're okay with it, of course, because they hate Trump and would use this or any means at their
disposal to send him on his way. But get them talking and you'll soon see them admit that it's not fair —
they just don't care. Which is why, when this idiocy fails, it will be time to return the House to common sense, and a
legitimate investigation into the coordination, strategy, and origin of the #fauxpeachment must be commenced. Key to
that investigation would be an honest conversation with a man named Eric Ciaramella. Ciaramella is an expert on
Ukraine. As a CIA analyst he has a thorough working knowledge of the intricacies of the region and the outgoing
administration there. Ciaramella worked for the Obama administration and figured out a way to place himself as a
holdover into the Trump administration — specifically at the White House.
of Obama Mole Eric Ciaramella Should Be Shouted From Patriot Rooftops. Fox News contributor Mollie Hemingway
called out the name of alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella on-air following a Fox Management network ban on hosts and
personalities ever mentioning it. It's a good start and one we hope that doesn't cost the courageous Hemingway her
future contributions to Fox News. But the name Eric Ciaramella should be shouted from every patriot rooftop because in
real life, Ciaramella's the Barack Obama handpicked mole installed in the Deep State — whose assigned mission is
to bring America down.
hear from the whistle blower. It seems ludicrous that in an open society, a president could be impeached and
possibly removed through a process that begins with a report by a bureaucrat whose identity is never formally revealed and
who is immune from examination. After all, the impeachment process is an attempt to override the decision of the
electorate as to who shall be president. It should not be undertaken, and certainly not consummated, without the
fullest, most open process, including the possibility of investigating the origins of the process. It's true in theory
that the "whistleblower" who set the process in motion might suffer adverse consequences from having his identity revealed.
[...] But even if there were adverse consequences, this prospect should not enable him to preserve any degree of
anonymity. Every important witness in this impeachment proceeding faces the possibility of blow back. The public
interest in a thorough impeachment proceeding overrides the desire to make the process pain free for witnesses.
and Facebook are erasing content with whistleblower's name. The day has finally arrived when our online media
monopolies are blatantly censoring the news that Americans can see. [...] [Eric] Ciaramella is being made into a non-person,
because House Democrats are dead set against calling him to testify in the impeachment inquiry that they are putting on
starting Wednesday. They don't want the public to know that he was an associate of John Brennan, evidently a central
figure in the manufacturing of the Russia hoax, that he worked for VP Biden, and that he is a registered Democrat.
History has seen similar efforts to pretend in the media that persons inconvenient to the powerful don't exist.
Mollie Hemingway still have a job at Fox News after naming the whistleblower on live TV Sunday? Fox News
Contributor Mollie Hemingway, senior editor at The Federalist and a highly regarded independent journalist, created a stir
during a panel discussion on FNC's Sunday morning program Media Buzz hosted by Howie Kurtz. At 11:19 A.M. E.T.,
as the program was being broadcast from Washington, D.C. without a delay, the topic of the "whistleblower," who set the ball
rolling on the move to impeach the president because of the July 25th Trump-Zelensky phone call, came up.
Schiff: We Don't
Need No Stinking Whistleblower. When House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced that the Democrats would launch an
"official impeachment inquiry," she said this action had been made necessary by a whistleblower complaint concerning a phone
call between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Madam Speaker used the term "whistleblower" no
fewer than eight times in her five-minute statement. Saturday [11/9/2019], however, we learned that the anonymous
individual whose complaint loomed so large in the speaker's decision to launch the investigation will not be permitted to
testify before Congress. House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), whom Pelosi assigned to lead the inquiry,
announced that the whistleblower's testimony would be "redundant."
Committee Published Name Of Alleged Whistleblower Last Week. Last Wednesday, the House Permanent Select
Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI), chaired by Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff, published the unredacted name of a man
alleged to be the so-called whistleblower who helped launch impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump.
During HPSCI testimony, William Taylor, the charge d'affairs of the U.S. Embassy in Kyiv, Ukraine, was asked by a staff
lawyer on the committee whether the name Eric Ciaramella was familiar to him. [...] The transcript of that exchange, which
was not redacted, was published and publicly released by Schiff's committee last Wednesday [11/6/2019]. On October 30,
Real Clear Investigations published a lengthy article alleging that Ciaramella was the official who filed a formal complaint
against Trump on August 12.
contributor names alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella on-air despite network ban. Fox News contributor Mollie
Hemingway named the alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella on-air following a network ban on hosts and personalities doing
so. Appearing on Sunday's [11/10/2019] Media Buzz, Hemingway, who is also a senior editor for the Federalist,
discussed whether or not the press should identify the whistleblower at the center of impeachment proceedings against
President Trump. Despite Fox News banning employees from doing so, she said his name. "The media should be
in the business of sharing information that is in the public interest," she argued.
Pelosi finally sick of the terrible damage Schiff is doing to her party? [Scroll down] Is it possible
that even she is sick and tired of Schiff's mendacity, his secrecy, his shutout of Republican questions, his witness
tampering? He even advised "witnesses" not to answer questions from Republicans. Most of these people being
called to testify are not witnesses to anything relevant; they are just vague anti-Trumpers willing to prostitute themselves
in one way or another before Schiff's cloak-and-dagger, repressive little show trial that, as many have commented, is
reminiscent of the tactics of the former Soviet Union. His campaign to impeach the president, in this shoddy manner, denying
Trump any due process, is so transparently unconstitutional that it boggles the mind. Whom does he think he is fooling?
YouTube, Twitter all ban any mention of "whistleblower" Eric Ciaramella as the Overton Window of allowable speech collapses.
Anyone publishing the name of the so-called deep state CIA "whistleblower" Eric Ciaramella is being systematically de-platformed by Google,
YouTube, Facebook and Twitter. This is happening because lawless Leftists fully understand that the more people learn about Eric
Ciaramella, the more rapidly the "Ukrainegate" impeachment hoax collapses. An insane effort has been undertaken by the entire CIA-run
fake news media and CIA-puppeted tech giants to memory hole the name "Eric Ciaramella" and erase it from reality. What they are really
trying to pull off is history's first secret impeachment proceedings characterized by anonymous accusers who may never be identified,
cross-examined or even named.
Hemingway Turns Fox Studio Into HAZMAT Area as She Names the Whistleblower. For over a month now it has been an
open secret in Washington that the so-called whistleblower whose complaint kicked off the impeachment farce led by Adam
Schiff is a CIA employee named Eric Ciaramella. Ciaramella has ties to the Democrat party, to Joe Biden, to John
Brennan, to Democrat operative Alexandra Chalupa, and was booted from the National Security Council for leaking information
designed to damage the Trump administration. Ciaramella's allies are gaslighting us by falsely claiming that Ciaramella is
owed "anonymity" for his perfidy. This is simply a lie in all aspects. The only person, according to law or regulation
who can't release Ciaramella's name is the Intelligence Community IG. Whistleblower status merely gives him immunity from
retribution based on this action, it does not cover public shaming or disciplinary actions not related to the complaint.
House Visitor Logs Detail Meetings of Eric Ciaramella. Judicial Watch announced today analysis of Obama-era
White House visitor logs that detail meetings of controversial CIA employee Eric Ciaramella, who had been assigned to the
White House. Ciaramella reportedly was detailed to the Obama White House in 2015 and returned to the CIA during the
Trump administration in 2017. The logs also reveal Alexandra Chalupa, a contractor hired by the DNC during the 2016 election
who coordinated with Ukrainians to investigate President Trump and his former campaign manager Paul Manafort, visited the
White House 27 times.
signals he will reject GOP 'sham' witness requests. House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff rejected
the GOP's request that the panel summon Vice President Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden, to testify at public impeachment
hearings next week. The California Democrat also signaled he will not agree to some of the other witnesses Republicans
requested Saturday [11/9/2019], including Alexandra Chalupa, a former Democratic National Committee staffer who Republicans
said worked with the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington, D.C., "to try to get political dirt on then-candidate Trump's campaign."
Schiff, who will head public impeachment hearings beginning Wednesday, said in a Saturday statement that he will consider a list of
witness requests provided by the GOP.
Dishonesty Is Certain to Morph Again. If Adam Schiff were a prosecutor, his November 5 contribution to USA
Today would violate rule 3.8(f) when he claimed (again) that he had secret evidence of a secret crime committed by the
president. Our system of due process (as codified by this rule) recognizes that it's unfair for an accuser to use
newspapers to claim access to secret evidence of a target's criminal conduct. This isn't something that was allowed to
happen in past impeachment efforts and Americans should be skeptical of Schiff's case when he's not giving the president's
team equal access to the evidence of the supposed "crime." What crime? Schiff doesn't name the crime anywhere in
his 940-word vanity piece. Instead, he aggrandizes himself and these hearings that give witch hunts a bad name.
Adam Schiff's Outhouse
Politics. Representative Adam B. Schiff's (D-Calif.) impeachment inquiry is a real danger to every Democrat
associated with it. Less than two years ago, Schiff's libertine idea of truth showed itself. Jay Whig called him
out then for misrepresenting the nature and purposes of the independence of the FBI. Schiff went on to claim that, as
chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, he had seen evidence that Trump had colluded with the Russians, with the
implication that the Mueller report would expose this. Schiff was caught in this lie, spectacularly, when Special
Counsel Robert Mueller revealed precisely the opposite of what Schiff had said he knew for a fact.
There was never any evidence of coordination between the president or his campaign and Russia.
The 'Whistleblower' and Rep. Adam Schiff should be first
to testify in Trump Impeachment Theater. The first witness should be the so-called "whistleblower," the
government employee who brought the complaint to Schiff about that phone call to Ukraine. There is no way, really,
around this. To do otherwise is to admit that all this is about, really, is overturning Trump's 2016 election, which
caused the bipartisan Washington establishment to break out into hives and TV news anchors to cry on air. [...] The worry for
Democrats is that if it is just a partisan exercise, Trump Impeachment Theater will be seen as a lame addendum to the Mueller
Russia Collusion investigation, which failed to find evidence that Trump or anyone else colluded with Russia over the 2016
election. It was the "whistleblower" who brought the complaint to Schiff and his committee staff, alleging that Trump
had committed an outrage during that phone call to the president of Ukraine.
Calls On Adam Schiff To Testify As Part Of Impeachment 'Show Trial'. Republican California Rep. Devin
Nunes on Friday [11/8/2019] formally called on House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff to testify about his or his
aides' contacts with the Trump whistleblower as part of what he's calling the impeachment "show trial" against President
Donald Trump. "Prior to the start of your public show trial next week, at least one additional closed-door deposition
must take place," Nunes wrote to Schiff on Friday. "Specifically, I request that you sit for a closed-door deposition
before the House Intelligence, Foreign Affairs, and Oversight Committees," he continued, referring to the three congressional
committees taking part in the impeachment inquiry.
The Radicalizing of Eric
Ciaramella. While the lawyers representing Eric Ciaramella, the alleged "whistleblower" in the Trump
impeachment fiasco, describe him as having spent his entire career in "apolitical civil servant positions," the truth is that
Eric Ciaramella has been involved in radical political behavior throughout his life — including his years at
Yale. In fact, long before he was digging up dirt with the DNC's Alexandra Chalupa about President Trump's mythical
collusion with Russia, Ciaramella was involved in leading a protest over what he believed was the poor treatment of Bassam
Frangieh, a radical professor of Arabic Studies at Yale.
Docs Shed Light on Ukraine Scandal. We have conducted an in-depth analysis of Obama-era White House visitor
logs, and we have learned a good deal about the people who controversial CIA employee Eric Ciaramella met with while assigned
to the White House. Ciaramella reportedly was detailed to the Obama White House in 2015 and returned to the CIA during
the Trump administration in 2017. Real Clear Investigations named Ciaramella as possibly being the whistleblower
whose complaint sparked impeachment proceedings against President Trump. As reported by the Examiner, Fox News'
legal analyst Gregg Jarrett indicated that a key takeaway was the "reported direct relationship" Ciaramella had with former
President Barack Obama's CIA Director John Brennan and national security adviser Susan Rice, as well as the "Democratic
National Committee operative who dug up dirt on the Trump campaign during the 2016 election."
the whistleblower scrub his social media footprint before filing his complaint? RealClearInvestigations writer
Paul Sperry, who exposed the anti-Trump impeachment whistleblower as one Eric Ciaramella, has found something else
interesting about the man. [...] He did a pre-scrub of his social media footprint, quite possibly anticipating that he might
just get famous. Sperry points out that it roughly parallels what was seen in the social media presence of anti-Judge
Brett Kavanaugh accuser, Christine Blasey Ford. [...] One wonders if Congress is ever going to get a chance to ask young Eric
why those social media posts disappeared and who told him to do it. One suspects that the answer would be interesting.
One also notes that suddenly, Ciaramella doesn't want to testify to Congress.
tightens grip on impeachment probe, slaps 'absurd restrictions' on GOP witnesses. With Rep. Adam Schiff,
D-Calif., set to move his partisan impeachment inquisition from the basement of the U.S. Capitol into the light of day, the
chairman of the House Intelligence Committee is determined to maintain tight-fisted control over the public proceedings.
In going public with the "impeachment sham," as Republicans refer to the effort to take out President Donald Trump, Schiff
issued a list of guidelines that will be used to maintain a tight grip on proceedings and attempt to limit who Republicans
can call to testify.
transcript highlights Schiff efforts to block GOP questioning about whistleblower. House Intelligence Committee
Chairman Adam Schiff took steps to block Republicans from questioning Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman about leaks damaging
to President Trump during his closed-door testimony. The California Democrat blocked GOP lawmakers from questioning
Vindman about his conversations with other members of the intelligence community following a July 10 meeting with Ukraine
government officials and after Vindman listened in on a July 25 call between President Trump and Ukrainian President
Goes Full Stalin. As Rep. Adam Schiff's "sentence first, trial later" show trial of President Donald J.
Trump reaches a so-called public hearing phase, we find the weaver of fables dictating what witnesses the GOP will be permitted
to call based on a set of three qualifying question they must answer in advance. These questions ask, essentially, if the
witnesses believe President Trump is guilty of pressuring Ukraine to dig up dirt on the Bidens in exchange for military aid.
The GOP, it seems, will not be allowed to call witnesses who have testimony or evidence to the contrary, that there was no pressure
and no quid pro quo. Nor will the GOP be allowed to present witnesses or evidence that confirms that the "dirt" is accurate,
that the crime of threatening to withhold aid for a personal and political favor, a crime Biden has already confessed to, was
committed by Biden, not Trump, on behalf of Biden's son Hunter. Nor will the GOP be allowed to make the case that any Trump
inquiry of the Ukrainians was mandated by a treaty signed by President Bill Clinton.
Dies in Darkness — Speak the Whistleblower's Name. [Scroll down] Rush Limbaugh, the most
listened-to voice on the radio airwaves, similarly mentioned Ciaramella. "There have been all kinds of publications
that have mentioned the whistleblower's name," he explained earlier this week. "He has been outed by any number of
conservative publications. His picture has been published. He's known. Everybody knows his name! But
look, everybody's still talking like the guy hasn't been outed, like the guy hasn't been identified. He has been.
But where? See, until the mainstream media does it, it hasn't happened! See how this works?" Atop feigning
that the president's namesake revealed Ciaramella as the leaker, the narrative maintains that naming a whistleblower violates
not only law but also morality. Whistleblower statutes protect government workers from repercussions. They
do not command journalists, or even most members of the government, to provide them anonymity.
to the Left: It is not a crime to 'out' the 'whistleblower'. In a heated exchange with Donald Trump Jr.,
who had named the Trump-Ukraine whistleblower in a tweet, The View co-host Sunny Hosting on Thursday [11/7/2019] claimed that "it
is a federal crime to out a whistleblower. ... My law degree says it is." Hostin said to former Fox News contributor Kimberly
Guilfoyle, who also appeared on the Thursday broadcast, "You're a lawyer, we know each other, you worked for a prosecutor.
I mean, did you advise your boyfriend that it is a federal crime to out a whistleblower?" "Well it's not a federal crime.
It's only a federal crime for the IG to do it, that's in the statute," Trump Jr. said.
Nunes Formally Requests Testimony from Adam Schiff. HPSCI ranking member Devin Nunes has sent a letter to HPSCI
Chairman Adam Schiff formally requesting his testimony prior to the public impeachment hearings next week. On its face
this might seem like a stunt; and it might indeed be dismissed by Adam Schiff; however, at the heart of the issue is
something quite serious and quite factual. There is mounting evidence the entirety of the Pelosi, Lawfare-Schiff
proceeding is a collaborative event that includes the coordination with a CIA 'whistleblower'. Specifically because the
issues in/around the originating 'whistleblower' have become a risk to the effort, and in a complete reversal from the
original premise, Adam Schiff is now refusing to present testimony from the originating whistleblower.
Impeachment Witness Marie Yovanovitch Caught in Apparent Falsehood Under Oath. Former U.S. Ambassador to
Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch, who was fired by President Donald Trump in May, misled lawmakers in her testimony she gave as part
of House Democrats' impeachment probe, according to a report. Yovanovitch testified behind closed doors on October 11
that in mid-August, a Democrat House Foreign Affairs Committee staffer had reached out to her on her personal email with a request
to come and talk to the committee about the circumstances of her departure.
Nunes Requests Adam Schiff Testify in the Impeachment Inquiry. House Intelligence Committee Ranking Member
Devin Nunes (R-CA) on Friday sent a letter to Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) requesting that the House Intelligence Committee
chairman testify as part of the impeachment inquiry. In the letter, Nunes argued that Schiff should testify in lieu of
the "whistleblower," since the "whistleblower" went to Schiff's staff before filing his complaint and since Schiff will not
let the whistleblower testify.
revises testimony on quid pro quo. Gordon Sondland, the ambassador to the EU and a key player in the dispute
over what the Trump administration said or didn't say to Ukraine about military aid, has revised his testimony to the House
impeachment probers. He says the revision is the result of having his memory refreshed by the testimony of Bill Taylor,
the acting ambassador to Ukraine. [...] Any competent journalist would follow up this paragraph by immediately describing the
nature of "the public anti-corruption statement that [Sondland and the Ukrainian official] had been discussing for many
weeks." If that statement was a general pledge to combat corruption, for example, then there was nothing wrong with
withholding aid until the statement was made. If that statement included a promise to investigate Joe Biden, then the
administration's position would be problematic.
witness cites NYT as source for his understanding of Trump's Ukraine motive. Along with the announcement that
the first public impeachment probe hearings would start next week, on Wednesday, House Democrats released the deposition
transcript of one of their star witnesses in the probe: Top U.S. diplomat to Ukraine Bill Taylor. [...] But while
impeachment boosters may hail Taylor's testimony as damaging to the president, they might need to take a second look at
it. Indeed, it appears that many of Taylor's opinions about the Ukraine matter were, as the Federalist's Sean Davis put
it, "formed largely from conversations with anti-Trump staffers within the diplomatic bureaucracy." [...] He even admitted at
one point that his main source for his understanding of why the president wanted the investigations was the New York
Times. When asked whether or not he did any due diligence to find out what the concerns about Burisma or the 2016
election were before he took his post earlier this year, he responded "no."
The Anonymous Coup.
But after the White House released a transcript of the phone call between Trump and Ukranian President Volodymyr Zelensky,
the credibility of the "whistleblower" began to shred. News reports revealed that a Schiff staffer met with the unnamed
accuser before he filed the official complaint in mid-August; contact Schiff initially denied. Trump and congressional
Republicans started raising more questions about the author of the complaint and the suspect timeline of events.
Suddenly, the "whistleblower's" testimony became unnecessary. Insisting that the call's transcript proved that the
"whistleblower" accusations were accurate, Schiff lost interest. Further, Schiff warned, the president and his
supporters had placed the "whistleblower's" life in danger. The media quickly took its cue and now refuses to name the
"whistleblower," even though journalist Paul Sperry last week confirmed his identity as Eric Ciaramella, a partisan operative
with ties to former CIA Director John Brennan and former Vice President Joe Biden.
Whistleblowers 'Should Be Allowed to Remain Confidential'. While speaking to reporters on Tuesday [11/5/2019],
Senator Mitt Romney (R-UT) reacted to calls to reveal the whistleblower's identity by stating that whistleblowers, especially
those speaking about government action, "should be allowed to remain confidential." Romney said, "My own view is that
whistleblowers, particularly those that are blowing whistles on action within the government, should be allowed to remain
The Editor says...
That may be true, but only if [#1] the whistleblower has credible evidence of an actual crime, [#2] the
whistleblower has no political axe to grind, book to write, or TV "analyst" job in the works, and [#3] the whistleblower's
claims can be verified. And what if the so-called whistleblower is spreading lies, while hiding behing this relatively new
legal protection? Is there no penalty for false whistleblowing? Is such conduct completely risk-free?
The Difference Between
Schiff and Shinola. Before Russiagate collapsed, [Adam] Schiff claimed to have seen "ample evidence of
collusion in plain sight." That assertion turned out to be a cynical lie, of course. Then, when an anonymous
bureaucrat filed a complaint concerning President Trump's conduct during a July call with Ukrainian President Zelensky,
Schiff emphatically stated that neither he nor his committee had prior contact with the "whistleblower." This
misrepresentation was too much even for the Washington Post, which awarded him four "Pinocchios." Worst of all,
he fabricated part of the Trump-Zelensky transcript as he opened a hearing to investigate the matter. It's hardly a
surprise, then, that Schiff's impeachment inquiry has not exactly been a model of transparency. Closed-door hearings,
selective release of transcripts, and leaks of deceptively edited testimony have exacerbated public uncertainty about
ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch 'used her personal email account to message Democrat staffer over a 'delicate issue'.
The former US ambassador to Ukraine used her personal email account to message a Democratic staffer over a 'delicate issue' a month before
the whistleblower complaint was made public, according to Fox News. Marie Yovanovitch testified under oath she had not replied to
Democratic congressional staffer Laura Carey. [...] Carey's emails and Yovanovitch's reported replies will raise questions of who knew about
the whistleblower complaint before it was made public and which Democrats were warned of its contents. It will also lead to question
on whether Yovanovitch committed perjury.
'Whistleblower' Eric Ciaramella Worked Closely with Anti-Trump Dossier Hoaxer. Eric Ciaramella, whom Real Clear
Investigations suggests is the likely so-called whistleblower, was part of an Obama administration email chain celebrating
the eventual signing of a $1 billion U.S. loan guarantee to Ukraine. That and other emails show Ciaramella interfaced
about Ukraine with individuals who played key roles in facilitating the infamous anti-Trump dossier produced by Fusion GPS
and reportedly financed by Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee.
The Constitution trumps federal whistleblower law. "The Constitution trumps any statute, including a
whistleblower statute," Levin explained [11/5/2019]. "The idea that the American people are just observers and not
participants in this process is an abomination. It's unconscionable." "This is about a constitutional system,"
Levin stated, rebutting arguments about keeping the federal employee's identity secret. "This is about an effort to use
the whistleblower statute to remove a president of the United States over nothing." The host went onto explain that if
a duly elected president of the United States is to be impeached, there are several questions that the American people
deserve to have answered about the person whose complaint started the effort to do it.
Oh! Schiff's Staff Forgot To Redact Ciaramella's Name From Bill Taylor's Transcript. Either Adam Schiff
's staff overlooked the name of alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella in the transcript of acting U.S. ambassador to Ukraine
Bill Taylor before releasing it or Eric Ciaramella isn't the whistleblower. Turning Point USA's Benny Johnson reported
that on page 236 of Taylor's transcript, Taylor is asked if the name "Eric Ciaramella" rings a bell for him. This
question is asked by the Oversight Committee Republicans' chief investigative counsel, Steve Castor.
Schiff Calls His First Public Witnesses And It Tells Us Everything. Public hearings are finally about to begin
in Adam Schiff's "impeachment inquiry" and he's called his first three witnesses. Who he's choosing to march out first
tells you everything about the game the Democrats are trying to play. [...] Not a single one of these "witnesses" had any
direct line to Donald Trump at all. None of them received any order from the President to do anything, by their own
admission. Further, nothing in their previous testimony pointed to them having any secondary knowledge of an improper
quid pro quo involving Joe Biden.
Schiff Makes Up New Rules for Impeachment Inquiry. House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff
(D-CA) issued a set of restrictions on Thursday morning limiting Republicans to calling witnesses that can respond to three
questions, all of which reflect Democrats' views.
whistleblower Eric Ciaramella was Biden guest at State Department banquet. Eric Ciaramella, the alleged Ukraine
whistleblower, was a guest of Vice President Joe Biden at a glitzy lunch in October 2016 to honor the prime minister of
Italy. Biden co-hosted the banquet with former Secretary of State John Kerry for then-Italian Prime Minister Matteo
Renzi. Ciaramella, who is of Italian heritage, was among the U.S. officials who accepted an invitation. This
week, the Washington Examiner reported that Ciaramella is now a deputy national intelligence officer for Russia and
Eurasia on the National Intelligence Council, reporting to the director of national intelligence.
Jordan: Republicans Will Subpoena 'Whistleblower' for Public Testimony. Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) said
Thursday Republican lawmakers plan to subpoena the so-called "whistleblower" to testify publicly as part of the House
Democrats' partisan impeachment investigation into President Donald Trump, according to The Hill. Jordan's remarks come
as lawmakers on Capitol Hill are battling over whether to identify the so-called "whistleblower," who RealClearInvestigations
suggests is likely to be CIA analyst Eric Ciaramella.
plot to impeach Trump already is falling apart. We already knew that the so-called whistleblower is an
entrenched anti-Trump activist, carefully coached by Schiff and his staff to bring about the current Ukraine nonsense.
Mr. Ciaramella was a willing plant with allegiance to John Brennan. He's been in on the plot to unseat Trump from
day one. Remember that group picture of the Obama loyalists taken on the day of Trump's inauguration? He is there
amongst the catastrophically disappointed, in the back row on the far right. [Photo] And now we know that
Ciaramella's lawyer, Mark Zaid, tweeted in July 2017 that the "coup has started," not the only tweet that reveals the
plan. So, the number of people known to be involved in the attempted coup is growing. Zaid's proud admission
should put an end to the entire impeachment scam. Schiff's latest folly is just another maneuver in the coup plotters'
game plan. It all needs to end with Schiff's Joe McCarthy-like self-immolation for his lies and for his crimes.
The Editor says...
How many others in this group worked for the CIA?
Taylor: Ukraine Unaware of U.S. Hold on Aid During July 25 Call, Quid Pro Quo Impossible. U.S. diplomat
Bill Taylor told impeachment investigators last month that Ukraine did not know the U.S. had temporarily frozen aid at the
time of the July 25 phone call, making quid pro quo impossible, transcripts released Wednesday revealed. Taylor's
October 22 depostion behind closed doors suggests Trump did not threaten to withhold aid during the infamous July 25
call between him and his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky that ultimately triggered the impeachment inquiry.
Paul blocks Senate push to protect Trump whistleblower. Sen. Rand Paul, R.-Ky., on Wednesday [11/6/2019]
blocked a resolution to reaffirm whistleblower protections, accusing Democrats of "selective outrage." Senate Minority
Leader Chuck Schumer, D.-N.Y., and Sen. Mazie Hirono, D.-Hawaii, made a unanimous consent request, meaning all 100
senators must agree with no objections, to adopt a resolution underscoring the importance of protecting whistleblowers.
"I support whistleblowers, and I do think they have a role to play in keeping government accountable ... but what we have
seen over the last few years is that we have a system that we should continue to refine," said Paul, as The Hill reported.
in anonymity. The media tells us there is a "heroic" whistle blower who claims President Donald John Trump
broke a law — never specified — in a phone call to the newly elected president of Ukraine.
President Trump released the transcript of the call, which shows nothing of the sort. Nevertheless, the media is pushing
for an impeachment to boost cable news ratings, and to divert attention from the best economy in 50 years, Disney's
ABC covering up Clinton's involvement with pedophile Jeff Epstein, and peace breaking out in Syria after 8 years of
war. But the media is deliberately refusing to name Eric Ciaramella as the Obamanaut who spied on the Trump
administration from within, just as Obama ordered the FBI to wiretap the Trump campaign.
Transcript Shows William Taylor Never Talked To Trump, Wasn't Even On July 25 Phone Call. A key Democratic
witness against Trump admitted in congressional testimony last month that he was not part of the July 25 phone call between
the U.S. and Ukrainian presidents, that he didn't see a transcript or readout of it until late September when it was declassified
and released, and that he has never even spoken to President Donald Trump. William Taylor, the charge d'affairs of the U.S.
Embassy in Kyiv, Ukraine, told lawmakers in secret testimony two weeks ago that his opinions about an alleged quid pro quo demanded
by Trump were formed largely from conversations with anti-Trump staffers within the diplomatic bureaucracy.
the phone call, and consciousness of guilt. [Scroll down] But importantly, the president, and others as
well, have also pointed to the circumstances of the Trump-Zelensky conversation as evidence that Trump had no intent to
commit any sort of offense, and certainly not one that the House would later deem impeachable. "It's common sense," the
president said last Thursday in an expansive Oval Office conversation after the House vote. "I've got 20-25 people on
the phone call. I've got stenographers and all of these people on the telephone. Am I going to make a statement
that's illegal or bad? I'm an intelligent person. Who would do a thing like that?"
Meadows: Gordon Sondland's Testimony Does NOT Confirm Quid Pro Quo. Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC) tweeted
on Tuesday [11/5/2019] that despite what many media headlines are reporting with regards to Ambassador Gordon Sondland's testimony, he
did not confirm there was a case of quid pro quo between President Trump and Ukraine. "Seeing many overblown (and outright false)
reports about Ambassador Sondland's testimony. Here's what he actually said. [#1] I did not (and still don't) know
why aid was held up [#2] I 'PRESUMED' it was because of corruption [#3] I told Yermak my
assumption," said Meadows, who sits on the House Oversight and Reform Committee.
Trump Teases Evidence
That Alexander Vindman Is A 'Never Trumper'. President Donald Trump teased the release of information Sunday he
says will show that a National Security Council official who provided damning testimony in the Democratic impeachment push is
a so-called "Never Trumper." In a press gaggle with reporters, Trump criticized Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman,
the director for European affairs on the National Security Council. Vindman told lawmakers on Oct. 29 that he raised
concerns with White House lawyers following Trump's phone call on July 25 with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky
that is at the center of a Democratic-led impeachment inquiry.
Cowardly 'Whistleblower' and 'Anonymous' Must Go Public. As Lee Smith details extremely well in his new book
The Plot Against the President, since the election of Donald Trump, the American public has been subject to a non-stop
barrage of leaked news, almost all of it completely inaccurate or so far out of context that it might as well be. In
the years leading up to the Mueller report, we were told by a myriad of media outlets and supposedly well-informed
politicians that evidence of Trump-Russia collusion was imminent. It never appeared, although journalists from the
Washington Post and the New York Times won Pulitzers for proclaiming that very thing based on sources that were —
what else — anonymous. These journalists were not reporters, as we know the word, but conduits for leakers
in our intelligence agencies and FBI with rusty axes to grind. It was these leakers, Smith points out, who actually
deserved the Pulitzer prizes, such as they were. The journalists were just their secretaries.
Volker Says Whistleblower 'Got Some Facts Wrong'. Former U.S. Special Envoy to Ukraine Kurt Volker, during his
impeachment inquiry deposition last month, highlighted some inaccuracies in the "whistleblower's" complaint that sparked the
probe, according to transcripts released Tuesday. The complaint mentions Volker five times. Asked for his
reaction to those references, Volker told House impeachment investigators, "I thought that it was a fairly accurate
characterization. He got some facts wrong."
Army Officer Remembers Lt. Col. Vindman as Partisan Democrat Who Ridiculed America. A retired Army
officer who worked with Democrat "star witness" Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman in Grafenwoher, Germany, claims Vindman
"really talked up" President Barack Obama and ridiculed America and Americans in front of Russian military officers. In
an eye-opening thread on Twitter last week, retired U.S. Army Lt. Colonel Jim Hickman said that he "verbally
reprimanded" Vindman after he heard some of his derisive remarks for himself. "Do not let the uniform fool you,"
Hickman wrote. "He is a political activist in uniform."
Levin: Barr and Durham should investigate trio of former National Security Council staffers. Conservative
commentator Mark Levin says the Justice Department should investigate three former National Security Council staffers.
One former staffer filed a complaint that spurred House impeachment proceedings and two others were recruited by House
Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff. Levin, who was Attorney General Edwin Meese's chief of staff during the
Reagan administration, appeared on Fox News host Sean Hannity's show last week and discussed how the National Security
Council has been exposed as a "rat's nest" in President Trump's White House. He said Attorney General William Barr and
U.S. Attorney John Durham, who is conducting a criminal inquiry into the genesis of the Russia investigation, should also
open up a related investigation into the origins of what is now the Democrats' impeachment proceedings.
CIA "Whistleblower" Eric Ciaramella May Be Implicated in Upcoming FISA Report. CIA snitch Eric Ciaramella filed
a whistleblower complaint on August 12 over President Trump's July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Zelensky where
the two discussed ferreting out corruption. This included talk on investigating the Biden crime family. The so-called
"whistleblower" Eric Ciaramella is a Democrat who had a "professional" tie to a 2020 Democrat.
Hume exposes 'huge fallacy' in Alexander Vindman's testimony to House impeachment panel. That fallacy, Hume
went on to explain, is that Trump cannot "subvert" U.S. foreign policy precisely because he is the "constitutional author of
foreign policy." "Actually, it's the fact that the president is the constitutional author of foreign policy, so the idea
he is 'subverting' it is illogical," Hume explained. Indeed, as the Constitutional Rights Foundation explains, the
executive branch has the most significant role in crafting U.S. foreign policy, and because the president is the head of the
executive branch, the president essentially determines the direction of U.S. foreign policy while in office.
Where Are the 'High Crimes'?
According to his accusers in this city, his crime is as follows: The president imperiled our "national security" by
delaying, for his own reasons, a transfer of lethal aid and Javelin missiles to Ukraine — the very weapons
President Barack Obama refused to send to Ukraine, lest they widen and lengthen the war in the Donbass. Now, if Trump
imperiled national security by delaying the transfer of the weapons, was not Obama guilty of a greater crime against our
national security by denying the weapons to Ukraine altogether? The essence of Trump's crime, it is said, was that he
demanded a quid pro quo. He passed word to incoming President Volodymyr Zelensky that if he did not hold a press
conference to announce an investigation of Joe Biden and son Hunter, he, Zelensky, would not get the arms we had promised,
nor the Oval Office meeting that Zelensky requested. Again, where is the body of the crime?
Jarrett: So-called whistleblower is actually an 'undercover informant and Dem operative'. Gregg Jarrett,
Fox News political analyst, didn't hold back Saturday when claiming that the so-called whistleblower is no such thing and as
such is not entitled to have his identity protected — even though his lawyers seem to have given up the game by
issuing a statement threatening publications as soon as they started publicizing his suspected name. A lot of people
have referred to the whistleblower as a spy, and Jarrett seems to agree.
Why Schiff. The
assignment of the impeachment to Adam Schiff and not the House Judiciary Committee shows what the real aim is.
Democrats assigned the House Intelligence chairman this task to protect the intelligence agencies who tried to overthrow
President Donald John Trump. America's spies and the FBI tried to frame him. They made false accusations of
treasonous collusion with foreigners to rig the election. 3 days before the inauguration, Chuck Schumer bragged
that the intelligence agencies can get you six ways to Sunday. That's possible. After all, Watergate was a coup
run by Mark Felt after Nixon passed him over for FBI director after J. Edgar Hoover died. Adam Schiff is a
tool of those politicized intelligence agencies that Schumer bragged about. Schiff is their spokesman.
your job!': Rand Paul demands media reveal whistleblower and Congress defend Trump. Sen. Rand Paul claimed
the name of the Ukraine whisteblower is known but said the media is refusing to publish it. "President Trump has great
courage," the Kentucky Republican said at a Monday [11/4/2019] campaign rally for the president. "He faces down the fake
media every day. But Congress needs to step up and have equal courage to defend the president." "We also now know the
name of the whistleblower," Paul continued. "The whistleblower needs to come before Congress as a material witness because
he worked with Joe Biden at the same time Hunter Biden was getting money from corrupt oligarchs. I say tonight to the
media, 'Do your job and print his name!' And I say this to my fellow colleagues in Congress, to every Republican in
Washington, 'Step up and subpoena Hunter Biden and subpoena the whistleblower!'"
to know what Adam Schiff is hiding. It doesn't matter which side of the impeachment debacle you're on. If
you're being honest about its origins and you're knowledgeable about what has transpired to date with the impeachment
inquiry, you'll certainly want to know what Representative Adam Schiff is hiding. He has been involved with every facet
of the inquiry from well before the alleged Ukraine whistleblower Eric Ciaramella filed his report. Schiff's
credibility isn't aided by the fact that he blatantly lied about his involvement from the start and only revealed how deeply
entrenched he was in it when it was leaked the whistleblower contacted his office before contacting the DNI. Then, his
secret hearings in the basement of Capitol Hill proved to be a bad enough look for the Democrats they were forced to bring
it out into the open, at least partially, going forward.
Adam Schiff had a little Freudian slip on Twitter today [11/3/2019] as he outlined how his impeachment team views President
Trump defending himself against baseless accusations.
Impeachment Train to Nowhere. [This week's] vote was not to impeach, nor even to begin a formal impeachment
inquiry. It was to set the procedures for any impeachment hearing in the house. And what a lulu it is.
Under these rules Adam Schiff can block testimony from witnesses called by Republican members of the House Intelligence
Committee he chairs. It does not require the previous secret proceedings of the committee, held without even a
semblance of due process, be disclosed. (For those of you muttering angrily about the selective, clearly partisan leaks
to compliant press and demanding that Republicans release the transcripts, bear in mind they don't have them. Schiff has
withheld them.) Schiff and the Democrats can subpoena whoever they want; Congressman Devin Nunes and the Republicans
must make a showing of relevance in writing to Schiff's satisfaction." The president and his counsel will have no
opportunity to participate until after the Schiff inquiry is done and a report filed with the Judiciary Committee of the House.
Trump Versus 'The Interagency Consensus'. [Scroll down] What are the "consensus views of the interagency"
in this context? Trump is accused of withholding aid to Ukraine in exchange for Ukraine investigating the (quite
obviously shady) business dealings of a political opponent's son. However, the aid in question was military aid to the
Ukraine, including weapons, to help combat Russia. Trump's predecessor, Obama, was unwilling to give the Ukraine lethal
military aid. In 2015, Sen. John McCain, not exactly a charter member of the Trump fan club, chastised the Obama
administration for this. "The Ukrainians are being slaughtered and we're sending them blankets and meals.
Blankets don't do well against Russian tanks," he said. Were federal officials in 2015 sounding the alarm about Obama
defying the "interagency consensus"?
the Ukraine phone call 'whistleblower' be facing indictment? The so-called "whistleblower" (who dd not follow
the protocol necessary to qualify for whistleblower protections) could well be facing serious legal jeopardy. [...] If he
first went to politicians, and concealed that behavior when applying for whistleblower status, he is not entitled to such
protection. And the notion that publications would be responsible for the acts of others who learned a name is
absurd. Journalists could not report the names of criminals under such a doctrine, since they might be subjected to
John Ratcliffe: Adam Schiff's Problem Isn't That He's Biased, It's That He's Running A Corrupt Process. A
former federal prosecutor who sits on the committee tasked by Democrats with removing President Donald Trump from office
blasted Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., as being unfit to oversee the process. Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Tex., told
The Federalist on Friday [11/1/2019] that Schiff's problem isn't mere partisan political bias, it's that Schiff has a
conflict of interest given his secret interactions with the anti-Trump whistleblower before his false complaint against Trump
was even submitted. "It's more than just bias — it's an actual legal conflict of interest," Ratcliffe told
The Federalist. "Schiff is using his authority as a Chairman presiding over an impeachment inquiry to prevent
the investigation and discovery of facts about his own actions or the actions of his staff."
Coincidences Involving The Whistleblower Abound. Here's what we know about Eric Ciaramella (EC):
He submitted a whistleblower complaint on August 12th.
He is a registered Democrat.
He is a CIA analyst who specializes in Russia and Ukraine. He ran the Ukraine desk at the National Security
Council (NSC) in 2016.
He was detailed over to the NSC in the summer of 2015 and worked for then-National Security Adviser Susan Rice.
He worked for former Vice President Joe Biden when he served as the Obama administration's "point man" for Ukraine.
He may have flown over to Ukraine with Biden on Air Force Two.
He worked for former CIA Director John Brennan and appeared to have been a highly valued employee.
In June 2017, then-National Security Advisor H. R. McMaster appointed EC to be his personal aide.
EC did not have direct knowledge of the July 25th conversation between President Trump and Ukrainian President
Volodymyr Zelensky. It is very possible he learned about the call from NSC Director for European Affairs Lt. Col. Alexander
Vindman, who testified last week before Adam Schiff's House Intelligence Committee.
question why Schiff is running impeachment. Under normal circumstances, the House Intelligence Committee would
not have jurisdiction over the string of witnesses who have filed into the impeachment proceedings in the Capitol basement or
the subject matter they are talking about. None of the material is classified, and those who have appeared before the
panel are mostly diplomats whose testimony about a July 25 phone call between President Trump and Ukrainian President
Volodymyr Zelensky would more suitably be scrutinized by the House Foreign Affairs Committee or the House Oversight and
Government Reform Committee. Both the Foreign Affairs and Oversight panels have been invited to participate in the
closed-door meetings, but it is Schiff and the Intelligence Committee staff Democrats who run the proceedings and who will
write the final report that will determine whether the House votes on articles of impeachment.
halt between whistleblower lawyers and Schiff staff amid expectation he won't testify. The whistleblower whose
complaint launched impeachment proceedings against President Trump is unlikely to testify to Congress, as talks have ceased
between his legal team and committee leaders. House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, who has overseen
depositions in Democrats' impeachment proceeding, was initially eager for the whistleblower to testify before citing concern
about the person being identified. Republicans accuse Schiff, a California Democrat, of changing course to prevent
inquiries into his staff's dealings with the whistleblower before he filed his Aug. 12 complaint to the Intelligence
Community inspector general.
Impeachment Meetings in Schiff's Secret Lair Will Continue as Long as They Remain 'Productive'. House Speaker
Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) told Bloomberg reporters during a roundtable discussion on Friday that she "would assume" that public
impeachment hearings will take place this month but added that depositions — held in House Intelligence Committee
Chairman Adam Schiff's (D-CA) secret impeachment chamber — will continue as long as they remain "productive."
Pelosi's admission follows reports of additional secret meetings scheduled over the next several days, despite the Democrats'
claim that their partisan resolution addressed Republican demands for transparency.
Levin on Alleged 'Whistleblower': National Security Council Was Exposed as 'A Rat's Nest'. [Quoting Mark
Levin:] ["]We have found the rat's nest. It's in the National Security Council. The whistleblower,
according to a number of reports, comes off the National Security Council. An Obama holdover. A Democrat.
Somebody who worked with Biden. Somebody who worked with Brennan. An Obama holdover who didn't like Trump, who
met with one of the active figures in the Ukraine effort to undermine the president of the United States in 2016. We
have two others, who now were hired by Schiff, Obama holdovers who worked in the Trump National Security Council. Now
they work for Schiff. How much do you want to bet that he colluded with? And of course, Schiff doesn't know
anything about it.["]
Ho Hum. The
Democrats have been talking about impeaching Trump since before he was inaugurated, and it was a foregone conclusion, when
they took over the House last November, that he would be impeached. The brief pause in providing arms to Ukraine (which
the Obama administration never did) and Trump's entirely proper telephone conversation with President Zelensky are absurdly
weak pretexts for the Democrats' impeachment effort, and I doubt whether anyone takes them seriously. Today's vote sets
out procedures for the ongoing inquiry, which will proceed in multiple House committees. Republicans rightly objected
to the procedures as unfair, in fact "Soviet-style." That is a fair characterization: among other things, Republicans can
only call witnesses if they are approved by the ridiculous Adam Schiff. Schiff will also retain the power to release
redacted transcripts of testimony at his discretion, as he has been doing. The only difference is that until now, they
have been leaks.
The Stupidest Impeachment
Ever. The latest high crime and misdemeanor that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) wants the U. S. Senate
to make into a federal case is this: In a phone call with his counterpart in Ukraine, President Trump conditioned the
provision of foreign aid on rooting out that nation's admitted corruption on behalf of the Obama Administration. Trump
denies that there was any kind of quid pro quo. Let's assume that during weeks of secret depositions in the
basement of the Capitol, U.S. Representative Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) can produce at least one 20-second soundbite that sounds like,
yes, there was some kind of reciprocal intent. Then Trump was engaging in foreign policy on something Congress should
celebrate, not prosecute. Here are the indisputable facts. A Ukraine court has ruled that country illegally meddled
against Trump in the 2016 election. That's kind of big, isn't it?
Ciaramella is the Whistleblower, Democrats Have Made a Major Blunder and Their Credibility Will Evaporate. If
Washington, D.C. is a swamp, then Eric Ciaramella is a viper who slithers among them. Most Washington insiders agree
that once you've lived and worked there for a while, it actually becomes very small. Residents seem to have at least
some degree of familiarity with most everyone around them. Considered one of the intelligence community's rising stars,
33-year-old Eric Ciaramella was well-integrated into the Washington establishment. When the American people fully
understand that Ciaramella submitted his complaint for the sole purpose of triggering an impeachment inquiry, and learn about
his activities and close associations in D.C., the limited credibility the Democratic Party still retains will
evaporate. Especially if the Durham investigation turns up criminal or merely unethical behavior on the part of Obama
'Whistle-Blower' Runs Away Screaming From Testifying With the Help of Adam Schiff. The Trump-Ukraine
"whistle-blower" likely won't testify, according to a new report from the Washington Examiner. This comes on the heels
of his legal team threatening news outlets from speculating or reporting on the identity of the person who kicked off the
latest round of impeachment fever. [...] While some are spinning this as "talks breaking down," the obvious indication here
is that Adam Schiff, being the underhanded actor he is, has decided it does not benefit him to have the whistle-blower appear
before Congress in any forum.
Whistleblower's attorneys break off negotiations with House — and threaten the media. Looks like we
won't have the Ukraine-Gate whistleblower to kick around in the impeachment follies after all. Despite his touching off
the latest scandal for Democrats' use in their years-long effort to remove Donald Trump from the presidency, attorneys
representing the career CIA analyst have broken off negotiations for his appearance in both the House and the Senate.
That may not end up being the last word if this goes to a trial, however.
pro faux: Trump impeachment legally fails. Impeaching President Donald Trump is legally flawed. The
chief law enforcement officer of the United States of America requested that Ukraine assist our attorney general in
investigating possible criminal activity in 2014 through 2016. Ukraine entered into the "Treaty Between the United States of
America and Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters," negotiated by President William Clinton and ratified by
the U.S. Senate in 2000 while Clinton was still president. So what Trump asked newly elected Ukrainian president
Volodymyr Zelensky to do, Ukraine was already compelled to do by its reciprocal treaty with the United States.
Jeanine: Ukraine whistleblower is connected to John Brennan and 'liar' Susan Rice. After a former CIA
chief expressed his gratitude for the "deep state's" role in triggering the impeachment inquiry into President Trump, Judge
Jeanine Pirro said on Friday that the former intelligence head "is not joking" when it comes to holdovers from the Obama
administration. "We know [the whistleblower] is connected to [John] Brennan and the liar Susan Rice and the whole lot
of them. [He's an] Obama holdover, worked with [Vice President Joe] Biden," the host of "Justice With Judge Jeanine" said on
"Fox & Friends." "The bottom line is you've got somebody connected to the CIA who is in there, intentionally put in
there. He's an Obama holdover and his job is to create some complaint so that they can start an impeachment inquiry,"
I'm Concerned Republicans Will Propose Witnesses to 'Smear' Trump's Opponents. During an interview broadcast on
Thursday's [10/31/2019] edition of "CBS Evening News," House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA) responded to
a question on whether he can assure Republicans that Democrats won't block witnesses by stating that he wants to hear which
witnesses Republicans want to call and that he is concerned that Republicans will "propose a bunch of witnesses that have no
bearing, that they can use merely to smear the president's opponents or for other improper purposes."
identical twin may be called to testify in impeachment probe. The identical twin brother of
Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council who testified this week before
House lawmakers in the Trump impeachment probe, may also be called to testify, according to a report. Yevgeny Vindman,
also an Army lieutenant colonel, works in the White House in an office next to his brother as an NSC lawyer handling ethics
issues. Alexander Vindman allegedly told investigators that his sibling had witnessed the decision to move the
transcript of President Trump's July 25 phone call with his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to a
top secret server, according to the Wall Street Journal.
Vindman's Impeachment Testimony Completely Rested On His Personal Opinions. A lot of rhetoric is being thrown
around, both in print media and on TV, about Lt. Col. Alex Vindman's testimony before the House Intelligence
Committee about President Trump's phone call with the president of Ukraine. He has been lauded by Democrats and the
press (excuse the redundancy), and most of the commentary and reporting ignores any analysis of his allegations about the
call. In Vindman's testimony, I see more appeals to emotion than to analysis and reason.
Whistleblower Hid Contacts With Schiff From Inspector General. He's an Obama holdover, a registered Democrat, a
CIA agent, and worked with a Democratic National Committee operative, Alexandra Chalupa, to get dirt on Trump in 2016. [...]
Prior to [Eric] Ciaramella being named as the possible whistleblower, there were reports that this person had contacted Adam
Schiff's staff prior to filing the report. Schiff knew of its contents beforehand. Remember that this report is
based on second-hand information, Ciaramella, or whoever the whistleblower is, never listened in on the July call, where
there has been an allegation that Trump shook down the Ukraine political leadership into opening a corruption probe into
Hunter Biden or risk having aid withheld. It's shoddy. The impeachment process has up until recently been in the
dark, where Schiff has been controlling the flow of information, even towards GOP members on the House Intelligence
Committee, who are given a one-page summary of the interviews that can only be read in the presence of a Democratic staffer.
Whistleblower's Identity Revealed, Now We Know Why Dems Wanted To Hide It. On Thursday, the House Democrats
made their impeachment inquiry into President Trump official, pushing through their resolution by a largely party line vote
of 232 to 194. Though Democrats have been pushing to impeach Trump since even before his inauguration, the trigger that
finally resulted in an official inquiry was a complaint by an unidentified whistleblower who heard second-hand about Trump's
much-analyzed July 25 call to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky asking him to "look into" the allegations of corruption
involving former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden. Though Democrats have been working hard to keep
the identity of the whistleblower under wraps, reports this week published his alleged identity — and conservative
talk radio host Rush Limbaugh says that now that more details are out, it's painfully clear why Trump's political enemies
wouldn't want the whistleblower identified.
Enough "Quid Pro
Quo" Gaslighting. Horse trading is the oxygen of politics; it is how politicians are persuaded to care about
things that otherwise would not make their radar. Not only does it happen all the time, but it is a core feature of our
political system; representative government relies on this kind of political trading to ensure a plurality of interests and
needs are satisfied. [...] It is not corruption. It's the warp and woof of a democratic political system. But in
routinely branding President Trump's dealings with Ukraine as potential "corruption," and pointing to the exchange of
unrelated asks as proof of that corruption, our friends in the fourth estate are acting in willful ignorance and bad
faith. The President has taken a firm position that he did not hold out foreign aid to Ukraine as a condition for
investigating Hunter Biden's activities there. But, even if he did, bargaining isn't corruption — it's
impeachment vote puts them in big trouble. Since his surprise election in November 2016, Washington insiders
have tried to drive the duly elected president out of office. First, it was based on a connection with Trump business
interests and Russia. We endured nearly two years of lawyers amassing testimony and hearing from various
witnesses. Americans footed a $40-million tab. There were no charges, and the process turned out to be [futile].
Then Democrats in Congress moved to the president's business interests. Reveal your tax returns. Give us your financial
data, has been the cry by partisans. That issue is being resolved in the courts and may not be settled until after the next
presidential election. No tab has been placed on this inquiry. Now we are on to the famous Ukraine phone call.
Ain't Over': Doug Collins Calls on Schiff to Testify About His Relationship With the Whistleblower. Republican
Congressman Doug Collins is calling on House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff to testify as a witness after
Democrats moved forward with their impeachment resolution Thursday morning [10/31/2019]. "Come to the Judiciary
Committee and take every question asked of you [Schiff]. Be the first witness and take every question asked of you, starting
with your own involvement with the whistleblower. Folks, this ain't over. Get ready. The cloud that is
dropping will be dropping on their heads because process matters and substance will always win out in the end and this
president has nothing to worry about on substance," Collins said.
Sifting the serious from the silly. There are people for whom the very fact that President Trump breathes in
oxygen and breathes out carbon dioxide constitutes an impeachable offense. House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam
Schiff, who is running the impeachment inquiry that got approved by the House Thursday [10/31/2019], is one of these
people. Is he going to run a fair inquiry? What are you, crazy? As the "impeach-him-for- breathing" crowd
would reply, where in the Constitution does it say Schiff has to be fair?
on Impeachment: Dems 'Coup' Will 'Push This Country to a Civil War'. On the House floor Thursday
[10/31/2019], Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) said the way House Democrats were running the impeachment inquiry into President
Donald Trump was "about to push this country to a civil war." Gohmert said, "Never in the history of this country have
we had such gross unfairness that one party would put armed guards [...] to prevent the duly authorized people from being
able to hear the witnesses and see them for themselves. And then, oh, we hear from this resolution today, we're going
to send you the depositions after we get through doctoring and looking at and editing the transcripts, we'll send you those,
so you have the evidence you need. That's not the kind of evidence that a coup should be based on. If we're going
to have what they're trying to legalize as a coup, we ought to have a right to see each of those witnesses."
House Official Testifies He Was 'Not Concerned That Anything Illegal Was Discussed' On Ukraine Call. The White
House's top official for European affairs told Congress on Thursday that he was not concerned that "anything illegal" was
discussed during the July 25 phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart that is at the center of
Democrats' impeachment inquiry. "I want to be clear, I was not concerned that anything illegal was discussed," the
official, Timothy Morrison, said in an opening statement reviewed by the Daily Caller News Foundation.
This 'Impeachment' Is a Cover-Up.
[Scroll down] Eric Ciaramella, the son of a bank executive and a 2008 Yale graduate, was evidently handpicked by
Brennan in 2015 for the National Security Council as an expert on Ukraine policy. At the White House, Ciaramella worked
closely with Susan Rice, Obama's national security adviser, and also with Obama's Vice President Joe Biden. Perhaps the
most troubling revelation in Sperry's article was that Ciaramella also worked closely with Alexandra Chalupa, a Democratic
National Committee operative who, in 2016, left her DNC job to pursue her own "investigation" of the Trump campaign. [...]
Why was Ciaramella's identity known to everyone in the media? Perhaps because, according to Sperry, Brennan's hand-picked
CIA agent inside the White House had been a source of leaks to reporters during the first six months of Trump's presidency.
It was conservative journalist Mike Cernovich who, in June 2017, blew the whistle on Ciaramella's sabotage operation.
Eric Ciaramella: Is this the best they've got? The whistleblower is now pretty well outed by investigative
journalist Paul Sperry, and it's underwhelming. He's been identified as one Eric Ciaramella, 33, prep school grad, Yalie,
Obama backwash, political operative, and fanatic Trump-hater. Hardly the Mister Probity concerned about national security
that's been painted. [...] Ciaramella's name should be out there because it's relevant whether all the hearsay in his legally
couched charge was actually made in good faith or was just another leftist smear job under cover of government mechanisms,
same as the Steele dossier.
Blowing the Whistle
on the Whistleblower. Paul Sperry of RealClearInvestigations wrote the name Eric Ciaramella on Wednesday
[10/30/2019]. [...] America merely lacked a name. We knew the type. Ciaramella graduated from a high school that
costs $30,000 a year to attend, received his undergraduate degree from Yale, and obtained a master's from Harvard. A
few years after graduation from that tony private high school, the youngster estimated to its alumni magazine of trips to 28
different countries (he admits he lost count). When others provide you with the best education and pricey junkets to
obscure parts of the globe, not getting the president you asked for might come as a terrible blow. So Ciaramella sought
to rectify this injustice by anonymously peddling secondhand gossip — false in large part — designed to
instigate another round of impeachment discussions. He did so by first going to Congressman Adam Schiff. When you
seek to report a federal crime, go to the FBI. When you seek to gin up political trouble, go to Adam Schiff.
He's a One-Man Ukrainian Lobby!
[Scroll down] None of that happened. But if it had, I would be exactly like Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman.
He was born in Ukraine and raised there until age 3½, when he was invited to our country. As you've no doubt heard, he
served in our military. Thank you for your service, Colonel! Now he is the top Ukrainian adviser on the National Security
Council. Of all the people who could look out for the U.S.'s interests vis-a-vis Ukraine, we got someone who was born there.
As such, Vindman was permitted to listen to a phone call the president of the United States made to the president of Ukraine —
a completely unnecessary, pro forma task. So, naturally, when he had a policy disagreement with President Trump pertaining to
the country he was born in, he thought he had a responsibility to agitate for removal proceedings against the duly elected U.S.
We Know Why The Media Won't Expose Trump's 'Whistleblower'. It turns out that the person who wrote the
second-hand, factually inaccurate account of President Donald Trump's call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky isn't
just some careerist, non-partisan CIA official, or even, as Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson put it,
a person with "some indicia of an arguable political bias." Eric Ciaramella is, as Sperry reveals, "a registered Democrat
held over from the Obama White House, previously worked with former Vice President Joe Biden and former CIA Director John Brennan,
a vocal critic of Trump who helped initiate the Russia 'collusion' investigation of the Trump campaign during the 2016 election."
Anti-Trump Complainant Eric Ciaramella Worked With Brennan, Biden, and DNC Operative Chalupa. The anti-Trump
"whistleblower," whose complaint against President Trump spurred the Democrats' impeachment inquisition, is a 33-year-old
registered Democrat who worked under Vice President Joe Biden and former CIA Director John Brennan, RealClearInvestigation's
Paul Sperry reported Wednesday afternoon [10/30/2019]. Eric Ciaramella, the anti-Trump operative, also worked with
Alexandra Chalupa, a Democratic National Committee opposition researcher who led the effort to link the Trump campaign to
Russia during the 2016 election.
Gossiper Eric Ciaramella: Democrat, Former NSC Staff, Worked with Joe Biden and John Brennan. Paul Sperry
from RealClearInvestigations has outlined the CIA "whistle-blower" who originated the hearsay complaint against President
Trump as Eric Ciaramella. According to the researched outline, Ciaramella worked closely with Democrat operative,
Alexandra Chalupa in 2016 to advance the anti-Trump effort; and this year Ciaramella worked closely with HPSCI Chairman Adam
Schiff's staff to continue his efforts.
'Whistleblower' Who Complained About Trump's Call to Ukrainian President Zelensky Revealed. Everything Trump's
defenders feared about the whistleblower is true! According to a report from RealClear Investigations, the whistleblower is
33-year-old Eric Ciaramella. Ciaramella is a holdover from the Obama administration and a registered Democrat. He's
been accused of leaking like crazy. He worked with Joe Biden, he's a vocal critic of President Trump, and he invited a DNC
operative inside the White House to attend meetings. He also helped instigate the investigation into Russia collusion.
So, of course, Democrats believe his second-hand complaint about President Trump's phone conversation with Ukranian President
Zelensky over the actual transcript of the call itself.
[the] 'Whistleblower' May Be Outed: Ties to Biden, Brennan, Schiff's Staff, Etc.. For a town that leaks
like a sieve, Washington has done an astonishingly effective job keeping from the American public the name of the anonymous
"whistleblower" who triggered impeachment proceedings against President Trump — even though his identity is an
open secret inside the Beltway. More than two months after the official filed his complaint, pretty much all that's
known publicly about him is that he is a CIA analyst who at one point was detailed to the White House and is now back working
at the CIA.
Schiff's drive to impeach Trump based on opinions, deception and illusions — Not facts. Rep. Adam
Schiff is a poor man's Harry Houdini. He is a cheap illusionist performing amateurish parlor tricks of deception in his
quest to convince his audience that he possesses damning evidence of an impeachable offense committed by President Trump.
Schiff, D-Calif., has no such evidence, of course. But like most illusionists, Schiff employs misdirection and confusion.
He attempts to convince you that opinions are evidence, while facts are not. This is the stuff of rank
political magic where perceptions are distorted through clever manipulation of the process.
is a power grab by Washington's establishment and it has nothing to do with Trump's character or the Constitution.
If Trump were accused of picking any Democrat at random and asking that a foreign government make up a lie implicating them
in some crime or corruption, then impeachment might be a moral imperative. But that's not what he did, and that's why this
cooked up controversy over his call with Ukraine has been impossible to understand from the beginning. It doesn't make
it easier to wrap your mind around it when the media refuse to talk about the most important issues. Ukraine is rife with
corruption; the country's government interfered in the 2016 election for the explicit purpose of hurting Trump's campaign; former
Vice President Joe Biden knew there was something wrong with his son's strangely lucrative business dealings with Ukrainian gas
'Whistleblower' Worked With DNC Operative Who Sought Dirt On Trump From Ukrainian Officials. A new report from
RealClearInvestigations reveals that the anti-Trump "whistleblower" who prompted the current impeachment proceedings against
President Trump is a registered Democrat who worked with a Democratic National Committee opposition researcher who dug up
dirt on the Trump campaign during the 2016 election. Federal documents reveal that the whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella,
previously worked in the Obama administration with former Vice President Joe Biden and former CIA Director John
Brennan. RealClear reports that Ciaramella remained there into the Trump administration, and headed the Ukraine desk at
the National Security Council, eventually transitioning into the West Wing, until June 2017.
Another impeachment witness who's not exactly unimpeachable. The Democrats have trotted out for the cameras
another supposedly unimpeachable impeachment hearing witness, building him up as the Ultimate Trump Slayer, the trump-Trump
trump card, the reason it's now all over for President Trump. We've seen this show before, first, during the Mueller
special counsel affair. Then with NSC aide Fiona Hill. Then with U.S. Ambassador Bill Taylor. The cold hard
facts show something different.
Star Impeachment Witness Vindman Confirms Trump Did Nothing Wrong. The only news that matters coming out of
Alexander Vindman's Tuesday [10/29/2019] impeachment testimony is that he once again proved President Trump has done
absolutely nothing impeachable, or even close to it. [...] All Vindman could come up with, all Adam Schiff's star impeachment
witness could do, was complain about petty and meaningless things the transcript might have missed, and because that was the
best Vindman could come up with — a guy who hates Trump and who heard the original call — we now know
the transcript of the call released by the White House correctly informed the public of what was said. Which means
Trump did nothing impeachable. Which means Nancy Pelosi's impeachment jihad continues to get dumber by the day.
decline to confirm CIA officer Eric Ciaramella is whistleblower. Attorneys for the whistleblower who submitted
a complaint about President Trump's July 25 call with Ukraine's president, prompting the impeachment process to begin,
declined to confirm or deny that their client was Eric Ciaramella, a career CIA officer. RealClearInvestigations
reported Wednesday that Ciaramella was the whistleblower. The Washington Examiner has established, however, that
there was at least one significant factual inaccuracy in the report, which was written by Paul Sperry, a partisan pro-Trump
figure who had released Ciaramella's name via Twitter earlier this month and whom critics accuse of trading in disinformation
and conspiracy theories. Asked whether their client was Ciaramella, 33, attorneys Mark Zaid and Andrew Bakaj told the
Washington Examiner in a statement: "We neither confirm nor deny the identity of the Intelligence Community
Impeachment: Matt Gaetz Files Ethics Complaint Against Adam Schiff. Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) on
Wednesday filed an ethics complaint against House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA) over his handling of
closed-door impeachment proceedings targeting President Donald Trump. Gaetz, a member of the House Judiciary Committee,
accused Schiff of distorting President Donald Trump's July 25th telephone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky
and barring congressional lawmakers from attending impeachment depositions.
longer an impeachment. Now, it's a railroading. Under pressure to make their Soviet-style impeachment to
overturn the results of the 2016 election "fairer," Trump-maddened Democrats have put on an "impeachment resolution" public
relations show in a bid to legitimize their secret basement hearings. [...] The shammy resolution, expected to be rammed
through Thursday in that desperate Democrat bid to get this whole thing over before the end of the year, does keep the House
Intelligence Committee under Rep. Schiff in the catbird seat, leading the impeachment as he has so far in his basement,
but now it effectively shuts Republicans out of the process.
Is Vindman a War Hero but Flynn a Traitor? [Scroll down] The phone call was in July. It's hard to
have a quid pro quo when the party being extorted is not told about the alleged quo. So just what was Vindman's problem
with the call? In his opening statement, Vindman says he came forward because he "did not think it was proper to demand
that a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen." Yet when pressed to explain where in the phone call transcript any
demand was made, he lapsed into psychobabble about Ukrainian President Zelensky inferring a demand because of Trump's more
powerful position in the world. [...] So why did Zelensky say he felt no pressure?
blocked in what Democrats charge is effort to uncover whistleblower. House Republicans are complaining that
House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff has blocked efforts to uncover whom Army Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman spoke
with about concerns that President Trump abused his power in dealings with Ukraine, efforts Democrats charge were designed to
discover the identity of the whistleblower. Democrats who heard at least some portion of the testimony Tuesday [10/29/2019]
by Vindman said the Republicans were pressuring him to reveal the identity of the whistleblower, whose complaint first surfaced
the allegations that sparked the impeachment process.
Schiff Accused of Witness Tampering in 'Soviet-Style' Impeachment Inquiry. House Intelligence Committee
Chairman Adam Schiff is reportedly telling witnesses testifying in the impeachment inquiry not to answer questions by certain
Republicans. While speaking with reporters on Capitol Hill, House Minority Whip Steve Scalise slammed the secretive
process, pointing out that Schiff gets to choose all the witnesses, but that he's also "directing witnesses not to answer
questions that he doesn't want the witness to answer if they're asked by Republicans." If true, this is, by definition,
Directing Witnesses Not To Answer GOP Questions. House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif.,
who is overseeing the ongoing illegitimate impeachment inquiry set in motion by Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., is reportedly
telling witnesses testifying not to answer questions asked by Republican lawmakers. Speaking to reporters on Capitol
Hill, House Minority Whip Steve Scalise, R-La., slammed the hidden process claiming Schiff was instructing witnesses
testifying behind the closed doors of the SCIF not to answer questions asked by Republican members.
Crenshaw challenges entire premise of Ukraine impeachment efforts. Finally! A political figure, rising
star Rep. Dan Crenshaw of Texas, has challenged the false premise that there was anything wrong with President Trump
asking for Ukrainian help in an investigation of corruption in the 2016 election undertaken by Joe Biden. Just because
it would potentially help discredit a potential political opponent is no reason to override the public benefit
from investigating corruption. For some reason, no other national politician has bothered making this point. [...] I
prefer to look through the other end of the telescope and express the question this way: Does becoming a potential
political opponent of the sitting president shield a politician from investigation of his or her political corruption,
exposure of which could harm his/her electoral prospects?
in the impeachment wall. Is the solid Democratic front in favor impeachment beginning to crumble? It's
probably more correct to say that it never existed at all. [...] This is simply further evidence, if any was needed, that the
impeachment effort is an empty scam, a massive PR stunt, with no substance to speak of behind it. It is a Potemkin
campaign jimmied up between Pelosi, Schiff, and the anti-Trump media.
Official Alex Vindman Testifies in Full Military Uniform, Despite Not Wearing One to Work Every Day. National
Security Council (NSC) official Alexander Vindman showed up to testify Tuesday as part of the Democrats' closed-door
impeachment inquiry into President Trump in full military uniform. This is despite not wearing one to work every day at
the NSC, according to several sources. Although Vindman is a lieutenant colonel in the U.S. Army, he is serving an
assignment at the NSC as the director for European Affairs. According to sources at the NSC, Vindman does not wear his
uniform to work at the NSC, where the standard dress is business wear.
House official says transcript of Ukraine call omitted key phrases: report. A White House official who
testified in front of the House on Tuesday [10/29/2019] as part of its impeachment investigation reportedly said the White
House's rough transcript of a July phone call between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky left out key
words and phrases. Three people familiar with the situation told The New York Times that Lt. Col. Alexander
Vindman testified to congressional investigators that among the omissions were Trump's assertions that there were recordings
of former Vice President Joe Biden discussing Ukrainian corruption and a reference by Zelensky to Burisma Holdings, the
energy company on whose board Biden's son sat.
Witness Bill Taylor Led Ukraine Delegation for Group Advised by Hunter Biden. Acting U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine
Bill Taylor, who provided key testimony to the Democrats' controversial impeachment inquiry last week, led an election
observation delegation in Ukraine earlier this year for a George Soros-funded organization that at the time boasted Hunter
Biden on its small chairman's council. Two months before he came out of retirement to serve as the highest ranking U.S.
official in Ukraine, Taylor led an election observer delegation to Ukraine's April 21, 2019 second round presidential
election for the National Democratic Institute (NDI) organization.
"whistleblower" Eric Ciaramella' ties to Susan Rice and Joe Biden. The worst kept secret in Washington is that
former NSC staffer and CIA employee Eric Ciaramella is Adam Schiff's secret "whistleblower" in the ongoing Nancy Pelosi
impeachment farce. More importantly, Ciaramella has a long history with Obama NSC advisor Susan Rice and former Vice
President Joe Biden. Add that to the list of "witnesses" before Schiff 's Stassi East German secret police-style lack
of intelligence committee. You have a succession of partisan Trump-haters with long pedigrees of either being Democrat
operatives. Deep ties to Burisma holdings. Or active participants in the George Soros Open Societies
Foundations. It is a remarkable parade. Eric Ciaramella. Ambassador Marie Yovanovich. Ambassador
William Taylor. Schiff staffers and former NSC employees Abigail Grace and Sean Misko both joining the staff of his
committee in August 2019. Just in time for the "whistleblower" report to be coordinated. Both worked with Ciaramella
on the NSC in the Obama White House.
have no evidence': ABC host challenges Adam Schiff on calling Durham investigation 'tainted'. A journalist
admonished House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff for having no evidence to support his claim that the Justice
Department's criminal inquiry into the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation has been "tainted" by President Trump's
political agenda. Last week, it was revealed that U.S. Attorney John Durham's administrative review, examining the
behavior of U.S. law enforcement and intelligence officials during the 2016 election, had transitioned from an administrative
review to a criminal investigation. "This is tainted because of the motivation, which is a political one, to serve the
president's political interests," Schiff said in an interview Sunday.
Media that Silenced Me Now Glorifying Fake Whistleblowers. Those behind this effort of destruction know full
well the non-impeachment impeachment inquiry will fail. It has been a farce from beginning to end, with not one vote
cast for it to even go forward as required by that annoying little thing called the Constitution. A minor detail, as it
appears. Knowing this, the "Resistance" marches forward, aware that the repetitive and constant use of the word
"impeachment" alone, particularly from the hallowed halls of Congress, will eventually color the minds of some. Just
the way the "Russian Collusion" onslaught did before.
Was it an authentic subpoena? Really? 'Surprised'
and 'disappointed': DHS leader Kevin McAleenan rejects Democrats' House subpoena. Kevin McAleenan, the outgoing
leader of the Department of Homeland Security, is rejecting a subpoena by House Democrats to testify before a congressional
committee a day before he vacates his position. Acting Secretary Kevin McAleenan's last official day in office is Oct. 31.
However, that did not stop Democratic Rep. Bennie Thompson, the chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, from ordering him
to be a witness before his committee Oct. 30 to discuss terrorist threats facing the U.S. In a sharp response, the outgoing
secretary said he would not be attending, and instead focus on an "effective transition" for the next DHS leader.
McCarthy on Dems ditching Nadler: 'They gave it to Schiff because he's more willing to lie'. On Friday
[10/25/2019], GOP House leader Rep. Kevin McCarthy provided his unvarnished opinion about what Democrats are up to in
their impeachment efforts, blasting Reps. Jerry Nadler and Adam Schiff in the process, but especially battering
Schiff. "They took it away from Nadler because they think Nadler's inept," McCarthy told attendees at the Washington
Examiner Political Summit. "They gave it to Schiff because he's more willing to lie, and they put it in Intel so he can
hide what's going on."
knows who the whistleblower is except the American people. Democrats have decided the whistleblower no longer
needs to testify. We will all be deprived of hearing this "brave" whistleblower's testimony. How convenient.
The 'courageous' partisan is a coward who doesn't want to show his face and throws bombs from a hiding place. The reason
seems clear to us. We believe it is because the whistleblower's only purpose was to start another probe. Hiding the
whistleblower and then making him disappear is more of a corrupt process. The whistleblower has no first-hand knowledge
and is, in reality, a leaker. The second whistleblower has wholly disappeared.
aide drops bomb on Cuomo: Whistleblower name no DC secret, says Trump, CNN know. Former Trump national
security aide Fred Fleitz questioned the protections afforded to the CIA whistleblower whose name he claimed is known by
Washington elites, including the president. Fleitz, who served as a Deputy Assistant to President Donald Trump in 2018,
argued with CNN's Chris Cuomo about the whistleblower whose complaint about the president's call with the leader of Ukraine
sparked the Democrats' impeachment inquiry. [Video clip]
GOP Senators Have Yet to Back Movement to Condemn Democrat Practices. Three Republican senators have yet to
back a resolution to condemn House Democrats' secret, closed-door impeachment inquiry practices. Senate Majority Leader
Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Senate Judiciary Committee Lindsey Graham (R-SC) introduced a resolution Thursday night to condemn
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's (D-CA) secretive impeachment inquiry proceedings. Graham announced Friday [10/25/2019]
that the resolution had gained 50 cosponsors across the Senate Republican conference; three senators have yet to cosponsor
the resolution sign on.
Has A Choice: Fight Anti-Trump Coup Effort Or Surrender Government To Democrats. Corporate media is
trying to spin the Ukraine story as if it is something other than what it is. As if it were legitimate and quickly
moving. Mike Allen of Axios opined of impeachment that "It's remarkable how fast it has gotten off the ground.
You can see how quickly the Ukraine phone call came out of nowhere to become the all-consuming impeachment topic —
way faster than the impeachment inquiries into Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton." Yes, this is a really good talking point
if you ignore literally everything that has happened since November 8, 2016. [...] Just as in 2000, the media screeching over
Rep. Matt Gaetz and his colleagues fighting the secret efforts — which are literally being led by a man who
lied to the public for years, falsely claiming he held evidence of Trump's treasonous collusion with Russia to steal the 2016
election — is not an objection to what Gaetz and his colleagues did but anger that some Republicans have the
audacity to fight back against what Democrats and the corporate media are doing.
Asks Media: 'Why Aren't You... Allowed to Go Into an Unclassified Hearing?'. House Intelligence Committee
Chairman Adam Schiff says his impeachment inquiry hearing is not classified, so why won't he allow the media to see what's
going on in it, Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.) asked reporters after he attempted to enter Schiff's secretive, closed-door
proceeding on Wednesday [10/23/2019]. Both they and members of Congress should be allowed into the hearing, Scalise told
reporters: "As soon as we went into the room, Adam Schiff hadn't even started the hearing — which, by the
way, Schiff pointed out himself was not a classified hearing. So, again, it begs the question: why aren't members of
Congress allowed to come into an unclassified hearing dealing with impeachment of the president? Why aren't you, as the
press, allowed to go into an unclassified hearing to find out what's really going on?"
A kangaroo court, conducted in secret, requires no testimony at all. Report:
Democrats Say 'Whistleblower's' Testimony No Longer Needed. House Democrats believe there is sufficient
evidence to advance their closed-door impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump without seeking testimony from the
so-called "whistleblower," whose complaint initially prompted the probe, according to a Thursday evening [10/24/2019] report.
News Echo Chamber: New York Times Prints Lies by Adam Schiff Witness Made in Secret Testimony. The New
York Times on Wednesday [10/23/2019] published what would have been a major story on White House National Security
Council (NSC) aide Kash Patel — if only it had been true. The story, which relies on leaks from Democrats
conducting the "impeachment inquiry" into President Donald Trump of testimony by one witness who had no firsthand knowledge
of the allegations she was making, claims Patel had provided President Trump with documents on Ukraine and met with the
president about them.
Scalise: '75% of the Entire Congress' Not Allowed to Enter Schiff's Secret Impeachment Chamber. [Quoting House
Minority Whip Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA)]: Our members are really angry about this and want to highlight what's going
on. They want to stop this Soviet-style process. If they are going to impeach the president, do it in clear
view. Everybody ought to be held accountable. Don't hide behind one guy, Adam Schiff, and all these other members
who want to have a justification for impeaching the president because they don't like results of the 2016 election, are going
to fall back on that in secret. We're all elected members of Congress. We get held accountable every two years
for what we do. The things we do are done in public, not in secret. That's got to stop, and we need to continue
to highlight it. People back home know, too. One of the good things yesterday is that the press actually paid
attention for the first time to how bad a hijacked Soviet-style process this is.
Effect: GOP learns to stand on its hind legs against the left. After Democrats' breakneck-speed
impeachment of President Trump, conducted in secrecy in some dank Capitol basement with only selective leaks intended to
shape public opinion, Republicans finally called the gig up and stormed the barricades. Led by Rep. Matt Gaetz,
they startled and surprised the Democrats with a very un-Republican storming of the secret hearings, busting their way in to
be allowed in and calling for transparency, not just for themselves, but in the name of the voters. What were Democrats
going to do — holler about decorum? [...] Republicans knew nobody was going to get arrested if they just charged
in because Congress is already a law unto itself. Impeachment is being conducted the sneaky way Democrats like, with no
courts to appeal to, and that's emboldened them to make up rules as they go along, ignoring transparency, respect for the
voters, and precedent.
News Chump Howard Kurtz Buys Adam Schiff's Selective Leaks. Fox News' Howard Kurtz not only advertises himself
as a newsman, he advertises himself as a newsman's newsman — as a gatekeeper and watcher of newsmen, as an
imperious referee whose oh-so-vital job it is to guide the news and its newsmen to a more enlightened place. But he's
really just another hack. [...] Good grief, this is not supposed to be hard. Schiff is a proven liar and partisan,
William Taylor is a proven Never Trumper, there are three [...] years of the Russia Collusion Hoax as precedent, and you have
only heard one side of the story — and even that side has come via a selective leak! On top of that, you
have three Republican congressmen claiming Taylor's (third-hand hearsay) testimony completely collapsed when challenged, and
Kurtz is falling for it, in public, AGAIN!
President Trump says, 'where's the whistleblower?'. It has been nearly a month since legislators released the
whistleblower complaint that prompted multiple congressional committees' probes into President Donald Trump and the
administration's actions in Ukraine. In the time since that complaint came to light, it's been rapid-fire witnesses on
Capitol Hill — but the whistleblower has remained largely out of the picture. "Where's the Whistleblower?"
Trump tweeted on Wednesday morning [10/23/2019]. Last week, Rep. Adam Schiff, chairman of the House Intelligence
committee, said on CBS' "Face the Nation" that they want to make sure to identify other evidence pertinent to the investigation
and that, "it may not be necessary to take steps that might reveal the whistleblower's identity to do that."
Why the secrecy, Rep. Schiff?
House Minority Whip Steve Scalise asks an excellent question: "What is Adam Schiff trying to hide?" Schiff — the
point man for impeachment — could at least try to explain why he's holding all his hearings behind closed doors, with the
public getting only leaked, and likely biased, accounts of the testimony. To dramatize the problem Wednesday [10/23/2019], 30
House Republicans stormed into the room that was to host Schiff's next secret hearing. The chairman responded by leaving,
postponing the testimony of Defense Department official Laura Cooper. Schiff notes that GOP members of the three committees
handling the inquiry are free to attend the hearings, and ask questions. But he has yet to offer any good reason why they
can't also call witnesses, or why nothing is happening in public.
Sondland Says William Taylor's Most Damning Testimony Never Happened. U.S. ambassador to the European Union
Gordon Sondland disputes the most damning portions of Acting Ukraine Ambassador William Taylor's impeachment testimony.
And here we go again. Welcome to Russia Collusion 2: The Star Chamber, where Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) holds
secret basement impeachment hearings hoping to overturn a presidential election using selective leaks, and our corrupt media
play right along.
Jordan defends GOP lawmakers who stormed impeachment inquiry room. House Freedom Caucus Member Jim Jordan,
R-Ohio, defended Republican lawmakers who stormed the sensitive compartmented information facility room where Rep. Adam
Schiff, D-Calif., was about to hold a Trump impeachment inquiry hearing. Jordan claimed Wednesday [10/23/2019] on "The
Ingraham Angle" that Schiff, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, has not been transparent as he leads the
impeachment inquiry. "Here's the fundamental question — There's one person who started this whole
thing — the whistleblower — in the whistleblower's complaint, bullet point number one, he says over the
past four months more than half a dozen U.S. officials gave me the basis for this complaint," Jordan said.
Testimony by Bill Taylor Was 100% GOSSIP. On Tuesday [10/22/2019], William Taylor gave his 'stunning' testimony
that they expect will lead to President Trump's final reckoning. At least that's what the media suggests. The
testimony was devastating, brutal, damning, explosive, and it was the smoking gun, according to the MSM. Bill Taylor, the top
American diplomat to Ukraine, testified about an alleged quid pro quo involving Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
witness Taylor has ties to Burisma think tank, Soros, McCain leaker. The star witness in the Schiff Pelosi
impeachment farce, Ambassador William Taylor, has long-standing ties and a financial relationship to a Burisma funded think
tank, according to Breitbart News investigative reporter Aaron Klein. Klein also reports that Taylor has a
long-standing relationship with David Kramer, the advisor to Senator John McCain who leaked the Steele Dossier to
Buzzfeed. More ominously a Schiff staffer on a Burisma funded trip to Ukraine in August met with Ambassador Taylor to
discuss the "whistleblower" complaint. The Atlantic Society, funded by Burisma, also receives funding from the George
Soros Open Society Foundations. It is a trifecta of corruption undercutting Taylors testimony.
Misfire: William Taylor's Smokeless Gun. [Scroll down] William Taylor is, for the time being at
least, the acting United States envoy to Ukraine. The 15-page opening statement he read aloud before taking questions
from committee members reveals more about Taylor's role in the metastasizing administrative state than any offense committed
by President Trump. It contains, for example, a considerable amount of kvetching about the way Trump's administration
was managing its relationship with the new Zelensky government: "I found a confusing and unusual arrangement for making
U.S. policy towards Ukraine." Anyone with experience in large bureaucracies will recognize this standard complaint of all
such functionaries when faced with change.
Schiff's Intelligence Committee chairmanship is Pelosi's big mistake. Adam Schiff is just the most recent
autocratic bully to grace our national politics in apparent ignorance and disavowal of the law, due process and the
Constitution. He has assembled a star chamber in a pathetic effort to find something, anything, with which to impeach
President Trump. That his own party is supporting him in this wretched endeavor is a sad commentary on the state of the
Democrat party; they stick together like fleas on a dog no matter how sick the dog. [...] The mystery is why Republicans have
put up with Schiff's nonsense until now. He's an obvious egomaniac intent upon destroying the President by any means
that might work. His obsession is a blight upon the House, his party and his district.
Republicans request first impeachment witness: The whistleblower. House Republicans, who have been denied
the authority to request witnesses in the ongoing impeachment inquiry of President Trump, asked Democrats to summon the
anonymous whistleblower to testify publicly. Republicans leading the House Intelligence, Foreign Affairs, and Oversight
committees on Wednesday [10/23/2019] sent a letter to Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff requesting the whistleblower
testify in an open session as well as "all individuals he or she relied upon in formulating the complaint." Republicans
wrote to the California Democrat that the whistleblower's accusations have been contradicted by information the three panels
have since gathered in closed-door impeachment testimony from several witnesses this month.
GOPers Cross Schiff's Star Chamber Borders. Dozens of angry Republicans breached the border of House Intelligence Committee
Chairman Adam Schiff's (D-Calif.) secret tribunal on Wednesday. Schiff who is taking pretend security steps to conceal his pretend
impeachment inquiry from public scrutiny has prohibited Republicans from attending his publicity stunt hearing. [...] The witness, senior
Pentagon official working on Ukraine Laura Cooper, was the Schiff's blue plate special but the Pelosi junta blocked members of the committee
of jurisdiction, the House Armed Service Committee, from attending.
Schiff [is] Desperate to Hide William Taylor Testimony that Would Kill Ukraine Hoax. The Big Fake News today
[10/23/2019] is that Ukraine's top diplomat, William Taylor, delivered a smoking gun to Rep. Adam Schiff's (D-CA) secret
impeachment hearings. That is not hyperbole, those are the headlines — "smoking gun." So here we are
again with Russian Collusion 2 in full swing, with the WALLS CLOSING IN ON TRUMP, and all of it backed by a
coordinated news cycle about how President Trump is toast, done, over and out, corrupt and kaput fer realzies this time.
Democrats, impeachment doesn't mean you'll carry the White House in 2020. The New York Times reported recently
that Democrats have "resigned themselves to the likelihood that the impeachment proceedings against President Trump will
extend into the Christmas season..." The reason for the extended timetable, we read, is that Democrats want to make
the "simplest and most devastating case" possible against the president. What rot. Despite the numerous witnesses
that have been questioned, the numerous closed-door interviews and purposeful leaks, it is quite clear that Democrats have
discovered little beyond the original phone call between President Trump and President Zelensky of Ukraine with which to make
real 'constitutional crisis' is all on Democrats. The Constitution requires "treason, bribery, or other high
crimes and misdemeanors." This means that the "high crimes and misdemeanors" should be on the same level as treason or
bribery. If the Democrats had any real, credible evidence of "high crimes and misdemeanors," they would not be
requesting that President Trump assist the House Democrats, nor would they be holding secret hearings. They would be
having open, televised hearings. There is no reason for President Trump to cooperate with Pelosi's kangaroo court,
especially since the supposed basis for the impeachment is President Trump's phone call to Ukraine's President
Zelensky. President Trump released the transcript of the call. If the call is the basis, then Pelosi and Schiff
have the transcript. The transcript speaks for itself. If this is an impeachable offense, then Pelosi should hold
the vote now to send it to the Senate. The Dems and media have focused on President Trump, and they are obsessed with
finding a crime, which means they have to manufacture a crime because no crime exists.
Republican: Schiff 'should not be leading this whole inquiry'. Rep. Jody Hice (R-Ga.) on Tuesday
[10/22/2019] doubled down on his calls for House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) to be censured and
removed from the Democratic-led impeachment inquiry against President Trump. "Adam Schiff is someone who not only ought
to be censured but is someone who certainly should not be leading this whole inquiry," Hice, who is a member on the House
Oversight and Reform Committee, told Hill.TV during an appearance on "Rising." "He lies to the American people, putting
words in the mouth of the president of the United States as though these are words that the president said — they
were not whatsoever," he added. Hice's comments come after the Democratic-led House rejected a resolution to censure
Schiff in a 218-185 vote.
heroes of the Week? Hillary, Schiff, and Mitt. [Scroll down] Then there is Adam Schiff, the inept
congressman from California whom Pelosi, in a moment of extraordinarily poor judgment, appointed to be head of the House
Intelligence Committee. That powerful position went to his head, already addled by his hatred for Trump. What he
lacks in intellect, honor, and judgment, he makes up for with chutzpah. There is nothing more ridiculous than a morally
and mentally deficient person who believes that others see him as brilliant and powerful. Schiff and Hillary share this
sad trait. [...] Like Hillary, Schiff has become a man who invites mockery. The Republicans were right to try to
censure him. The Democrats stuck together and voted against censure but surely know he is a terrible liability.
Star Chamber impeachment farce blows up in Adam Schiff's face. The faux Star Chamber impeachment farce against
Donald Trump proceeds this week with another flurry of secret hearings, chaired by the man who brought you the Russia Hoax,
and now Ukraine, Adam Schiff. Leaking out of these secret hearings and resulting depositions, despite Schiff's best
efforts to conceal it, is an unmistakable truth. Both State Department officials and political appointees alike are
putting the lie to the Democrat narrative. They are directly contradicting the assertions of Schiff and crazed House
Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Adam Schiff and Nancy Pelosi have put aside antiquated constitutional notions of due
process. Namely, the defendant's right to call witnesses, cross-examine testimony, have legal counsel, and be treated
with simple fairness. They are conducting these proceedings in a manner that would make the Stassi East German secret
Attempt to School Republicans Is a Disingenuous Fraud. [Scroll down] The president did not "privately"
press Ukraine about anything. He acted in his capacity as president of the United States to ask the Ukrainian president
to help investigate Ukraine's role in the effort, undertaken by assets in the U.S. intelligence community and the Clinton
campaign, to destroy first candidate Trump and then President Trump. It's not "conspiracy theory," let alone a
"long-debunked" one, it is a fact. The focus was, and is, on interference in the 2016 election, the concerted
effort by deep-state actors to intervene in the peaceful transfer of power and scuttle the election of someone duly elected
in a free open and democratic election.
Aren't Whistleblowers. They're Double Agents. The law does not define or even use the term "whistleblower" except
in the title, but it does clearly identify the people it's designed to protect. To be covered by the Intelligence Community
Whistleblower Protection Act, a would-be whistleblower must (1) be an employee of the intelligence community or of an intelligence
community contractor, (2) who intends to report to Congress a complaint or information, (3) with respect to an urgent concern,
and (4) who follows the disclosure procedures set forth in the act. The act defines "urgent concern" as a problem, abuse, or
deficiency relating to "an intelligence activity within the responsibility of the Director of National Intelligence." That's the
most concrete way we have of defining a "whistleblower." Those criteria show that this second person is not a whistleblower
at all. For one thing, we have no evidence corroborating the lawyer's assertion that his client is an intelligence
official. For another, there is no indication that he or she intends to submit a complaint to Congress.
might expose whistleblower, Schumer tells Intel officials. President Donald Trump continued his attacks on the
Ukraine whistleblower on Monday, Chuck Schumer is asking the intelligence community what is being done to protect the source
from harm. The Senate Minority leader asked both the acting director of national intelligence and the inspector general
on Monday afternoon [10/21/2019] to outline what "specific steps" they are taking to protect the whistleblower. Schumer
said his understanding is the unidentified individual is receiving some security but said that he fears "safety risks may
intensify in the event that the whistleblower's identity is disclosed."
might expose whistleblower, Schumer tells Intel officials. President Donald Trump continued his attacks on the
Ukraine whistleblower on Monday, Chuck Schumer is asking the intelligence community what is being done to protect the source
from harm. The Senate Minority leader asked both the acting director of national intelligence and the inspector general
on Monday afternoon to outline what "specific steps" they are taking to protect the whistleblower. Schumer said his
understanding is the unidentified individual is receiving some security but said that he fears "safety risks may intensify in
the event that the whistleblower's identity is disclosed."
The Editor says...
The so-called whistleblower, if he or she actually exists, is in no physical danger from conservative Republicans.
Political violence in this country comes from the left.
From what I've seen so far, the whistleblower is apparently either a composite of two or more people, or a fictitious
character fabricated by the Democrats.
rejects GOP measure censuring Schiff. Democrats in the House turned aside a GOP-led privileged resolution to
censure House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) on Monday [10/21/2019]in a straight party-line 218-185 vote.
Republicans and President Trump have increasingly targeted Schiff, a public face of the impeachment effort. They have taken issue
with Schiff's exaggerated account of the details of President Trump's July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky
during a hearing in September. Schiff has defended his remarks as being an intentional parody of Trump's comments.
Trump asked Ukraine to investigate. In his phone call with Ukraine's President Zelensky, President Trump asked
for a favor. The favor was not, as was widely reported at the time, to investigate Joe Biden. Rather, the favor
was for Zelensky's government to investigate Ukrainian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election: [...] There is a
certain irony here: for three years, we have been told that investigating foreign interference in the 2016 election is
of paramount importance. Now, it apparently is an impeachable offense.
Adam Schiff Pressured Witness To Change Story And Attack President Trump. Hook or crook, that seems to be the
operating procedure of the House Democrats' absurd (and illegal) fake impeachment inquiry against President Trump. Even
when it comes to trying to force witnesses to alter and/or make up testimony that they then hope to attack the president
with. This entire affair is a sad and dangerously divisive sham being carried out by radical partisans who care far
more about holding onto power than they do about what's best for the American people.
Schiff Pressured Witness to Change His Story and Accuse Trump of Pressuring Ukraine. Color me shocked, just
shocked, that Rep. Adam Schiff, one of the most underhanded, dishonest Congressional members in modern history, would
stoop to such levels. This relates to Kurt Volker's testimony, which turned out to be a major dud for Schiff and his
gang. While Volker, being a former John McCain staffer, was expected to come in and fillet Trump, it turned out that he
didn't have much to add to the impeachment fury. Trump, for whatever problems one might have with him talking about
Biden in the first place, simply didn't engage in a quid pro quo, threaten aid, or pressure the Ukrainians. As I wrote
at the time, it was reported that Schiff got so frustrated with how things were going that he sidelined his MSNBC lawyer to
question Volker himself. Now, we know why he did that and we've got the transcript to illustrate what happened.
Some Trees in the Forest of Babble. [Scroll down] Adam Schiff's impeachment fun house continues with no
apparent evidence of Trump wrongdoing. Having found nothing on collusion, he appears to be contending that failing to
cooperate with this nonsense is "obstruction" with his secret star chamber proceedings. With candidates whose platform
is socialism, unrestricted abortion, higher taxes, nationalized medicine, open borders, ridiculous restrictions on energy
production and use and such, it's questionable how this sideshow will serve them at all in 2020.
Inquiry is a Kangaroo Court. The Constitution gives the power of impeachment to the House of Representatives as
a body and not just to the House Intelligence Committee of Adam Schiff, who has colluded with an alleged Ukraine
whistleblower. Also in violation of House precedent is the fact that the House Judiciary Committee, which should have
jurisdiction, has been written out of the process. Schiff's record of manipulation and deceit in this impeachment
discussion and its purely political motivation has been well documented. And at least in the cases of Nixon and Clinton,
we had real crimes as a predicate: the Watergate break-in and cover-up and Clinton's lying under oath in a legal proceedings.
Witness and Schiff Staffer Meeting in Ukraine Organized by Burisma-Funded Think Tank. A staffer for House
Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA) attended a meeting in Ukraine last August with the acting U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine
that was organized by a Burisma-funded think tank linked to the Steele dossier, investigative journalist Aaron Klein reported
at Breitbart on Thursday [10/17/2019]. The Atlantic Council is a Washington D.C.-based think tank that works in
partnership with, and is partially financed by Burisma Holdings, the notoriously corrupt global energy firm connected to Joe
Biden and his son, Hunter Biden. The lucrative partnership is worth as much as $250,000 a year and has paid for "lavish
conferences in Monaco," Consortium News reported.
staffer Tom Eager & Impeachment witness Bill Taylor colluded? Adam Schiff's staffer Thomas Eager flew to
Ukraine on a mission to gain information which may very well have been to dig up impeachment dirt. The trip was paid
for by Burisma, Hunter Biden's recently former company. During the trip, Eager met with a witness in the impeachment
inquiry Ambassador Bill Taylor. It was Eager's first meeting upon arrival. That's not suspicious at all. [...]
Besides funding from Burisma, the Atlantic Council is also financed by Google Capital, billionaire activist George Soros's
Open Society Foundations as well as the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Inc. and the U.S. State Department. John McCain's
buddy, the man behind the dossier who runs the McCain Institute, David Kramer, also went.
Schiff Flip-Flopped On Whistleblower Testimony After Reports Of Coordination. House Democrats' top impeachment
inquisitor abruptly changed from repeatedly insisting on the testimony of a whistleblower against President Donald Trump to
working to prevent it. The change occurred as soon as it was revealed the complainant had secretly worked with
Rep. Adam Schiff's Democratic staff prior to filing his formal complaint on Aug. 12. At first, Schiff insisted an
anti-Trump bureaucrat sharing allegations against the president must share his story with the House Permanent Select Committee
on Intelligence. But after news broke that Schiff's staff had secretly worked with the whistleblower prior to the complaint
being lodged, discussions that the whistleblower failed to mention when specifically asked about them as part of the official
whistleblower process, Schiff moved to prevent the testimony.
All Rosa Parks Americans. The insanity going on before our very eyes regarding the Democrats' and fake news
medias' latest campaign to impeach Trump over nonsense is infuriating millions of Americans. It is the equivalent of
Adam Schiff flooding the airwaves with the lie that Trump stole his car and must be impeached for it. Meanwhile,
Schiff's car is parked untouched in his driveway for all the world to see. Ignoring the truth that Schiff's car was not
stolen, the Democrats and fake news media cart out a dozen witnesses (whistleblowers) who claim they saw Trump commit the
crime. This is exactly what is going on with Schiff's outrageous claim that Trump committed impeachable crimes during
his phone call with the Ukraine president.
Schiff's Impeachment Witness Tampering. House Republicans on Monday [10/21/2019] will attempt to force a vote
to censure Representative Adam Schiff (D.-Calif.), the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. The resolution,
authored by Rep. Andy Biggs (R.-Ariz.), has 170 Republican co-sponsors. (It's unclear why the remaining 27 GOP
congressmen have not signed on.) The motion condemns Schiff for actions that "misled the American people, bring
disrepute upon the House of Representatives, and make a mockery of the impeachment process, one of this chamber's most solemn
now holding 'Soviet-style' impeachment hearings. Secrecy has always been a pretty effective incubator for corruption, and
House Intelligence Committee chairman Adam Schiff's sneaky, secretive "hearings" on impeaching the president, literally held in a dank
Capitol basement outside public scrutiny, are producing it in abundance. Schiff's secrecy act thus far not only shuts out the
public, but excludes relevant opposition members of Congress from so much as listening to this Schiff show. Congressmen from
the "wrong" party, such as Rep. Andy Biggs of Arizona, an interested party with a right to be there as a member of the House
Judiciary Committee if anyone does, have just about literally been kicked out.
caught tampering with another witness. Adam Schiff is at it again, tampering with witnesses. Yesterday
[10/17/2019], he got caught trying to shove words into a witness's mouth, to make him say things he didn't want to say.
I wrote about that [elsew]here. Today, he's doing something just as bad, getting together with other witnesses and
working out a pre-coordinated story for the coming show trial.
Strangeschiff, or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Impeachment. Who could have guessed that the
words of Soviet secret police chief Lavrentiy Beria to Joseph Stalin, "Show me the man, and I will show you the crime," would
be strangely embodied in American politics and jurisprudence in the 21st century? [...] Bravo, comrade Strangeschiff! Please, continue
the Orange Man trial behind closed doors. After all, the American people are ecstatic about closed hearings without access by journalists
or lawyers. They are also especially fond of the removal of the president based on an anonymous gossip-monger, or two, or three.
Columnist Wrecks The Democrats' Trump-Ukraine Impeachment Claims. The Democrats allege there was quid pro quo,
wherein Trump threatened to delay military aid if Zelensky didn't open a corruption probe into Hunter Biden's arrangement
with Burisma, an energy company. Hunter Biden is the son of Joe Biden and has zero experience in the energy
sector. The Trump White House released the call and refuted all of the juicy claims made in this whistleblower report
from a reported CIA agent who is a registered Democrat and had worked with a 2020 Democratic candidate. Oh, and the
staff of Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), the chair of the House Intelligence Committee, was in contact with this person and
knew about the contents of the complaint before it was even filed. It's another orchestrated hit from the ashes of the
Russian collusion myth. You don't need to be an investigative reporter to see that the Democrats have nothing
here. That's why this entire inquiry is being done in secret.
About An Impeachment Process With Secret Evidence And Secret Witnesses. The forceful and thorough rebuke that
White House Counsel Pat Cipollone delivered to the "impeachment inquiry" will go down in history as the definitive document
defeating an attempted coup. Over the course of eight scathing pages in a letter last week, Cipollone thoroughly deconstructed
the absurd "Ukrainegate" narrative that House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (Calif.) has tried to construct.
Schiff: House 'May Not' Vote on Impeachment Inquiry. House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff
(D-CA) said on Monday that the House "may not" vote to authorize the ongoing impeachment inquiry. Schiff argued that
voting on the investigation would not stop Republican criticism of the process. His comments came during an interview
at the 92nd Street Y in New York City, moderated by New York Times reporter Nicholas Kristof.
using impeachment to consolidate power. The Democrats are clearly planning something with the illegitimate and
ever changing impeachment operation. While they may think they're clever and strategic, their modus operandi has never
been more obvious. The impeachment inquiry has never been about shady White House leakers or fabricated
whistleblowers. It is entirely about a Legislative Branch under the control and used at the discretion of the
Democratic Party. The end goal is to abolish the separation of powers, or checks and balances, as outlined in the
meet to debate (again). Here are five questions that need to be asked. [#5] Fifth, do the presidential
candidates agree that House Democrats should continue to ignore the fair, open process used in the Nixon and Clinton
impeachments? Do they agree that it was OK for Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., to totally falsify President Trump's
words in his opening statement at a committee hearing, or do they believe it was unacceptably misleading in something as
serious as an impeachment investigation?
are the Democrats hiding about impeachment inquiry? President Trump and other Republicans have been complaining
about Schiff's decision to hold most hearings behind closed doors, yet the Intelligence Committee chief opted for even
greater secrecy in last Friday's questioning of Marie Yovanovitch, the former US ambassador to Ukraine —
conducting it as a deposition, which makes it a criminal offense for either side to discuss her answers. That keeps
even the rest of the House in the dark about everything except the opening statement Yovanovitch made public. Schiff is
going to even greater lengths when it comes to the whistleblower whose complaint launched this whole... adventure. He
might not even have the guy testify — which would remove any chance for anyone to probe his motives and biases.
of Targeting Trump. Sane observers see impeachment as a travesty without either moral or legal grounds to
justify removing an elected president 13 months before the 2020 election. But sanity means nothing these days, given
the hatred of Trump, the volatility of the electorate, and the furious bias of the media. After all, we are planning to
impeach a president on the basis of a "whistleblower" who will not come forward, who is a Democratic partisan, who worked for
a current Democratic presidential candidate, who contrary to the whistleblower statutes went first to the Democratic Chairman
of what is now the impeachment inquiry committee, Adam Schiff, also chair of the Intelligence Committee, and whose formal
complaint was prepped by Democrat-affiliated lawyers. The whistleblower claims second-hand knowledge from leaking White
House Staffers who heard a confidential Trump conversation — a conversation whose transcript was immediately
released and was at odds in key places with the whistleblower's second- and third-hand versions. We are headed for a
Accusations and Their Dangerous Purveyors. Anonymous accusations have been regarded with suspicion by honorable
leaders for at least two millennia. Even the Romans rejected the use of such allegations against Christians.
Indeed, the Emperor Trajan explicitly admonished one of his provincial governors against doing so: "Anonymously posted
accusations ought to have no place in any prosecution. For this is both a dangerous kind of precedent and out of keeping
with the spirit of our age." The Democrats of our era aren't troubled by such scruples, it would seem. In fact,
they have used just such an accusation as the pretext for their "impeachment inquiry," and it is indeed dangerous. The
Democrats don't call it an anonymous accusation, of course. They have attempted to wrap it in a veneer of legitimacy by
calling it a "whistleblower complaint," but this collection of secondhand allegations was obviously produced by some
Getting Nervous. House Intelligence Committee chairman Adam Schiff, a California Democrat, stands at the center
of the impeachment of the president scam. And as word gets out about his real game and how he got it —
through a spying operation aimed at the White House that he directed, he's starting to get weirdly wobbly. Two
instances just from the weekend are starting to stand out. First, in stark contrast to the big hullabaloo he made about
hearing from the so-called "whistleblower" in Congress ahead of the planned Trump execution, Schiff suddenly doesn't think
the whistleblower is so very, very necessary to testify at his hearings at all: "We don't need the whistleblower
who wasn't on the call to tell us what took place during the call," he claimed.
Rep. Matt Gaetz ejected from closed-door impeachment meeting. A Republican member of the House Judiciary
Committee was ejected from a closed-door impeachment hearing. Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida tried to enter a hearing
Monday in which lawmakers from three different committees are interviewing President Trump's former top aide on Russia, Fiona
Hill. Gaetz said he believed he should be allowed to attend the hearing because impeachment inquiries traditionally are
handled by the House Judiciary Committee, and he serves on that panel. But the House parliamentarian told Gaetz he is
not allowed to attend the hearing because he does not sit on either the Intelligence, Foreign Affairs, or Oversight panels,
which are the official committees conducting the impeachment inquiry.
Whistleblower and the "Schiff-Biden Dossier". The Russian collusion fantasy was designed to frame Trump while
diverting attention from Hilary Clinton's real collusion with Russia in Uranium One and using the Clinton Foundation as a
pay-for- play cash cow as secretary of state. [...] Schiff and Biden are both trying to hide their corruption with another
anti-Trump diversion. Schiff sent a House intel staffer on a trip to Ukraine during August 24-31, just 12 days
after receiving the whistleblower complaint. To do what? To dig up what? It is reported the staffer met
with the previous president of the Ukraine, a friend of President Obama.
Shift: Schiff Now Says There Doesn't Need To Be A Quid Pro Quo. House Intelligence Committee Chairman
Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said on Sunday that there need not have been a desire for a quid pro quo agreement between
President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky for their phone discussion to lead to the president's
impeachment. Democrats claim Trump was withholding millions in U.S. aid, which he wanted to exchange for Ukranian help
investigating the business dealings of former Vice President Joe Biden's son Hunter, who made upwards of a million dollars
from a gas company in the country. Now, Schiff says no quid pro quo is necessary.
Sen. Cramer: 'The New Precedent for Impeachment' Is Dislike of the President. "There was no quid pro quo"
in President Donald Trump's July 25 phone call with the Ukraine president, Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.) told CNN's "State
of the Union" on Sunday [10/13/2019]. Host Jake Tapper, annoyed, repeatedly pressed Cramer to say that Trump's mention
of the Bidens in that phone call was "inappropriate." Cramer told Tapper that President Trump is "very clear" in
expressing his opinions, and Cramer said he doesn't get the sense that Trump was "pushing" the Ukrainians to do something.
Dies In Darkness: Adam Schiff Just Banned A GOP Lawmaker From Attending Key Ukrainegate Deposition.
Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., just banned a key Republican lawmaker from the deposition of a former anti-Trump national
security official believed to be at the center of ongoing Ukraine proceedings, sources tell The Federalist. Schiff
tossed Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., out of the deposition. Although the U.S. House of Representatives has not approved
a resolution authorizing a formal impeachment investigation, House Democrats have nonetheless insisted that they have full
authority to subpoena all documents and testimony they desire, even if specific committees lack the jurisdiction to demand
particular information. Schiff, whom Pelosi tapped to lead her party's anti-Trump impeachment efforts, chairs the House
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI), which only has jurisdiction over the federal government's intelligence
agencies and related components.
I 'should've been much more clear' about whistleblower contact. Rep. Adam Schiff Sunday [10/13/2019]
conceded he should have "been much more clear" in explaining the whistleblower's contact with his House Intelligence
Committee. The leader of the impeachment probe expressed regret for claiming last month his committee hadn't spoken to
the whistleblower who raised concerns about a conversation between President Trump and his counterpart in the
Ukraine — when in fact the anonymous official had approached an aide to Schiff for guidance on reporting
wrongdoing before filing a complaint. "I should have been much more clear and I said so the minute it was brought to my
attention," Schiff told CBS's "Face the Nation."
Schiff No Longer Requires CIA Gossip for Impeachment Testimony. First the impeachment strategy needed the
anonymous CIA gossiper to testify. Then it leaked about how HPSCI Chairman Adam Shiff and his Lawfare staff actually
created the "gossiper's" silly third-hand complaint to an inspector general; who then changed 'gossip' rules to allow
second and third-hand hearsay. It was all becoming more brutally sketchy, and the impeachment jenga blocks were tenuous
at best. As a result, republicans were going to inquire about how the CIA gossiper constructed his complaint; and then
the complaint attorney's started saying the gossiper would not appear in person, but rather write more complaint letters
instead of testifying. The shift from sketchy testimony to "Dear Sir" letters was ridiculous in the extreme. So
what happens next? Well, this is predictable. Chairman Adam Schiff now says there will likely be no gossiper testimony
because now he doesn't need it.
Adam Schiff Just Admit There Was No Quid Pro Quo? Appearing on CBS's Face The Nation Sunday morning
[10/13/2019], House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff essentially conceded that there was no quid pro quo
between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky by saying "there doesn't need to be a quid pro
quo." [...] For weeks now, we've been told that the transcript was evidence of a quid pro quo, and now Adam Schiff
is saying "there doesn't need to be a quid pro quo." Does anyone see this as a huge concession on Schiff's part?
Anti-Trump Tribunals to Continue as Congress Returns. If the Democrats have such a solid case against the
president, why do they have to keep it hidden? Sure they can cloak themselves in the need to keep the whistle blower
anonymous (everyone knows who it is anyway) but these other characters don't need to be kept secret, none of this is
classified. The reason has to be that they don't have the receipts for impeachment and must control the media narrative
with selective leaks to curry public support.
Trump's Former Russia Aide Who Will Testify in Impeachment Probe [is] Linked to Christopher Steele. U.S.
President Donald Trump's former top aide on Russia and Europe, Fiona Hill, is expected to appear Monday [10/14/2019] for a
private deposition in the House Democrats' impeachment probe. Hill officially left her post in the National Security
Council (NSC) in August after serving about two and a half years. Hill, however, handed over her responsibilities a
week before U.S. President Donald Trump made the call to his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky on July 25.
She may not know much about the conversation.
Congress May Not Need To Interview Whistleblower After All. Rep. Adam Schiff said Sunday that the House
Intelligence Committee might not need to interview the CIA analyst who filed a whistleblower complaint against President
Donald Trump, a reversal for the Democrat, who has come under fire for failing to disclose the whistleblower's contacts with
his office. Schiff acknowledged he initially supported the whistleblower testifying about the Aug. 12 complaint,
which centered on a July 25 phone call Trump had with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
Ukraine, and Justice. Even if we assume the worst, Trump did nothing wrong in Ukraine, and nothing more than
his duty. Applying pressure on Ukraine to investigate whether a past vice president of the United States engaged in a
corrupt bargain that that would potentially have been an impeachable offense is the constitutional duty of anyone who has
sworn to defend and protect the Constitution of the United States. The United States Constitution works on the energy
of "ambition made to counter ambition" as James Madison succinctly put it in the Federalist Papers. This is how freedom
works. [...] But beyond any charges of ambition, Trump has a solemn duty as articulated in the oath of office written into
the Constitution to: "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." Clearly, such duty not violated
by actions that could potentially protect the people from choosing a corrupt future president. Indeed, one might argue
that it requires such actions.
of the Flailing Impeachment Inquiry. The leaker, incorrectly tagged a "whistleblower," now doesn't want to
testify. Instead he wants to give his testimony "by letter," presumably from an undisclosed location where no one can
test his "testimony." Ostensibly this is because he fears for his safety. He is anonymous, so any claim of "death
threats" seems unlikely, although as we show below, we do have a rather good idea of his identity. In any event the
very notion is preposterous. [...] The real reason for this backoff, I think, is that once his identity is confirmed, it will
be clear this was a stupid setup by amateurs in Congress who wanted to cover their tracks. [...] Hoping to inject life into a
dead horse, Democrats announced two witnesses this week, both of which are disgruntled former Trump officials and neither of
whom had firsthand knowledge of the phone call that prompted this nonsense.
case for identifying the whistleblower. Here are three reasons the whistleblower should be publicly identified:
[#1] The public has a right to know. There is no higher public concern than a debate that could lead to the president's
removal. Simply put, everything should be public, because the public should be aware of everything that figures into the
process. The whistle has not been blown on a mid-level bureaucrat using a government credit card for personal expenses.
The whistleblower has accused the president of serious wrongdoing, and in doing so, has set off a proceeding of the highest public
concern on Capitol Hill. [...] [#2] The whistleblower set the terms of the debate. In his Aug. 12 complaint, he
laid out the accusation that Democrats would later wholly adopt in the effort to remove the president.
the media's relentless crusade to destroy President Trump. Last week The Washington Post revealed the alarming
news that House Democrats were considering having their anonymous "whistleblower" testify from a remote location, and in
disguise. Just as shocking as the details of this plan was the justification the Post ladled on this Democratic effort
to hide impeachment information from the public. It explained, high up in the story, that the cloak-and-dagger approach
was merely Democrats expressing "distrust of their GOP colleagues, whom they see as fully invested in defending a president
who has attacked the whistleblower's credibility and demanded absolute loyalty from Republicans."
incredible shrinking whistleblower. House Democrats are now demanding that the "whistleblower" be allowed to
testify by letter. This marks another step forward in the impeachment narrative. Yesterday it was from behind a
curtain with the voice artificially distorted. Today it's by letter. Tomorrow it will be from Elon Musk's Mars
colony. The excuse for this is the evergreen "death threats," but this is even less likely the case than in other
instances. A CIA operative is frightened by anonymous death threats? Are you sure? [...] Beyond that, there's the
fact that this is totally new legal ground — never has something as grave as a presidential impeachment been based
on a reed as flimsy as a single whistleblower. One wrong step and the witness will be spending the rest of his days in
one court or another, if not worse.
ex-CIA official says Ukraine intelligence official was no whistleblower. A former CIA official who exposed
waterboarding practices on war on terror detainees isn't a fan of the anonymous whistleblower in the Ukraine case
undergirding the impeachment inquiry of President Trump. "I don't think he's a whistleblower. I think he's an
anonymous source and there's a big difference," said John Kiriakou, who served two years in prison over the revelations from
the Bush administration, becoming the first CIA officer to be convicted of disclosing classified information to a
reporter. "If this whistleblower were truly a whistleblower, he would be happy to testify in open session before the
[House] Intelligence Committee or whatever other committee wanted his testimony," Kiriakou told the Washington
Examiner. "He is not an undercover officer. Therefore there is no reason to hide his identity from the White
House or further from the American people."
Schiff has 2 aides who worked with whistleblower at White House. House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam
Schiff recruited two former National Security Council aides who worked alongside the CIA whistleblower at the NSC during the
Obama and Trump administrations, the Washington Examiner has learned. Abigail Grace, who worked at the NSC until
2018, was hired in February, while Sean Misko, an NSC aide until 2017, joined Schiff's committee staff in August, the same
month the whistleblower submitted his complaint. The whistleblower was an NSC official who worked with former Vice
President Joe Biden and who has expertise in Ukraine, the Washington Examiner has reported.
Attorney Was Informant who Scuttled Trump's Nominee for CIA Watchdog. Andrew Bakaj, the attorney representing
the so-called whistleblower at the center of the impeachment movement targeting President Donald Trump, previously was a
whistleblower witness whose public allegations scuttled the confirmation of the Trump administration's nominee for CIA
inspector general. Bakaj's original complaint against Trump's nominee was filed with the office of the Inspector
General for the U.S. Intelligence Community. The IG at the time was Chuck McCullough, who is currently working at
Bakaj's three attorney law firm representing the so-called whistleblower.
Whistleblower Lawyers Now Retreat From Testimonial Appearance. A report from the Wall Street Journal outlines a
request by lawyers for the fake CIA 'whistleblower' that ultimately spells doom for the entire phony construct of the
impeachment construction by anonymous complaint. The Wall Street Journal is reporting the anonymous gossipers' lawyers
are now requesting official impeachment testimony by letters not an in-person appearance. If this is accurate such a
request speaks directly to the abject stupidity of the claim: [...]
Bombshell: 'All of This Is Calling into Question, Was There Coordination' with House Dems? The news that the
so-called whistleblower who objected to the substance of President Donald Trump's July 25 phone call with the Ukraine
president has ties to former Vice President Joe Biden elicited sharp reaction on Thursday night [10/10/2019].
Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), appearing on Fox News' "The Ingraham Angle," told guest host Jason Chaffetz that this news
now is "calling into question" whether or not the whistleblower engaged in "coordination" with House Democrats prior to
speaking out about concerns. Should this person have to testify in person — or not? "The reason why
there's a statue is when they [whistleblowers] become public, they don't get retaliated against," said Meadows. "To
have an anonymous ... it's just not what our government is set up to do," he added.
Who's Afraid Of Whom?
Despite the lack of scrutiny, both from the DOJ and the media, we do know that Hunter Biden was paid $50,000 a month by
Ukrainian energy company Burisma for not knowing anything about gas, oil or Ukraine. And we know from a Ukrainian MP
that Joe Biden himself was paid $900,000 by Burisma. Those are not unproven allegations, as almost every outlet calls
them. And they sure [...] ain't unfounded. Plus, Trump has every right to ask questions about this, whether in
the US or elsewhere. Where he won't be able to ask questions, if Pelosi and Schiff have their way, is in the fake
impeachment inquiry. There he may not even be able to bring a lawyer. Who's afraid of whom exactly, and of what?
Is the Whistleblower Tied
to Biden? [Scroll down] So by the whistleblower's two lawyers own words we learn that their
client — their client identified by the New York Times as a CIA official — "has spent their entire
government career in apolitical, civil servant positions in the Executive Branch" serving "elected officials." There are only
two elected officials in the "Executive Branch." That would be, of course, the president and vice president of the United
States. The charge now is that the whistleblower has ties to a current candidate in the 2020 race — and
quite obviously there is only one current Democrat candidate who has been one of the two elected officials in the executive
branch of government: former Vice President Joe Biden.
Tom Cotton Unloads On Intel Community Inspector General: 'Evasive,' 'Insolent,' And 'Obstructive'.
Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., unloaded on the inspector general at the center of the anti-Trump whistleblower kerfuffle,
calling him "insolent" and "obstructive" in a scathing letter released on Wednesday afternoon [10/9/2019]. Michael
Atkinson, the Intelligence Community Inspector General, or ICIG, is under fire for secretly eliminating a requirement that
whistleblowers provide first-hand information to support allegations of wrongdoing. The ICIG admitted that it secretly
changed its rules and forms in response to an error-ridden complaint filed against President Donald Trump that consisted
entirely of gossip, rumor, and second-hand information.
Unreasoned Impeachment Dysfunction Is Trashing Democrats. [Scroll down] Their claim that Trump committed
an impeachable offense in his conversation with the Ukrainian president when the resident discussed Joe Biden and his son's
payoff to enormous personal benefit is not a Trump problem. It is a Biden problem that Biden must deal with.
Neither the Ukrainian phone call transcript which the White House released, nor the whistleblowers' version, suggest that the
president sought a "payoff" for himself or anyone in his administration. The conversation just involved pursuit of
Biden's actions for a big Ukrainian "payoff" for his son, which is the actual violation of law. The Ukrainian president
had just won in a landslide on an anti-corruption platform, the U.S. has an anti-corruption treaty with Ukraine, and Trump is
the top law enforcement officer in the United States. So the phone conversation was more than justified.
Whistleblower Worked with Joe Biden at Obama White House. Democrat presidential hopeful and former Vice
President Joe Biden had a "professional" tie to the CIA Whistleblower, according to a report from the Washington
Examiner, which includes statements from intelligence officers and former White House officials. After two separate
reports from the New York Times, the Washington Examiner has established the whistleblower "is a career CIA
analyst who was detailed to the National Security Council at the White House and has since left."
The Biden Boomerang.
The American people deserve to know not only for whom the whistleblower worked and traveled (the [Washington] Examiner quotes
some speculation that the whistleblower might have accompanied Mr. Biden on Air Force Two on one of the veep's six trips
to Ukraine). Americans also deserve to know just who the whistleblower is, so they can make up their own minds about his
entanglements. Of all the scandalous elements bubbling out of Ukraine, the most shocking is the idea that an American
president, duly elected and sworn, might be impeached on testimony of an individual whose name is being kept secret —
from the President, the Congress, and the American voter. The Wall Street Journal, in an important editorial issued
Wednesday [10/9/2019], calls it "impeachment in secret."
Democrats subpoena Rick Perry in impeachment inquiry. House Democrats have subpoenaed Energy Secretary Rick
Perry to produce documents related to their impeachment inquiry of President Trump's discussions with Ukraine.
"Recently, public reports have raised questions about any role you may have played in conveying or reinforcing the
President's stark message to the Ukrainian President," wrote the three Democratic House committee chairmen leading the
impeachment inquiry. Foreign Affairs Chairman Eliot Engel, Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff, and Oversight Chairman
Elijah Cummings sent the subpoena to Perry on Thursday [10/10/2019].
president says there was no blackmail in Trump call. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky said Thursday there
was no blackmail involved during a telephone call with President Donald Trump that has since set in motion an impeachment
inquiry. Zelensky has come under pressure to shed light on a phone call with Trump in July in which the U.S. president
appeared to ask Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, a potential Democratic rival in the 2020 presidential
race, and his son Hunter Biden who served on the board of a Ukrainian gas company Burisma. Trump repeatedly tells
Zelensky that the U.S. has been "very, very good" to Ukraine, a non-verbatim transcript of the call showed. Zelensky
told him that Ukraine, a country that relies on international financial and defense aid and is vulnerable compared to its
powerful Russian neighbor, would work on the investigation.
Biden worked with whistleblower when he was vice president, officials reveal. The 2020 Democratic candidate
with whom the CIA whistleblower had a "professional" tie is Joe Biden, according to intelligence officers and former White
House officials. Lawyers for the whistleblower said he had worked only "in the executive branch." The Washington
Examiner has established that he is a career CIA analyst who was detailed to the National Security Council at the White
House and has since left.
Who Does the
Whistleblower Know? This already adds up to a suspicious sum: second-hand information, factual errors,
backdated changes in guidance, questionable sourcing, and a suspiciously back-door — and potentially illegal —
contact with the HSPCI majority before the complaint was filed, violating House rules. Trump's declassification put WB1 in a
bad light: the actual call transcript doesn't appear to fit the WB1 narrative, and the complaint itself appeared to have
a lot of political input. The Democrats' process has some really questionable aspects as well. First of all,
the irregular contacts with WB1 before the complaint was filed, and the violation of House rules by not notifying the Republican
minority. Then secondly, hearing testimony from the ICIG and from former Ambassador Kurt Volker, with the Democrats leaking
selected parts of the testimony but refusing to make the testimony public.
Cotton says intelligence watchdog shared extra details about Ukraine whistleblower with House Democrats. An
Intelligence Community watchdog gave preferential treatment to House Democrats conducting an impeachment inquiry into
President Trump while rebuffing Senate Republican questions, according to Republican Arkansas Sen. Tom Cotton.
"I'm dissatisfied, to put it mildly, with your refusal to answer my questions, while more fully briefing the three-ring
circus that the House Intelligence Committee has become," Cotton, who sits on the Senate panel overseeing the Intelligence
Community, wrote to Inspector General Michael Atkinson.
lawyer acknowledges client had 'contact' with presidential candidates. Mark Zaid and Andrew Bakaj, the
attorneys representing the whistleblower at the center of Democrats' impeachment inquiry, acknowledged in a statement on
Wednesday that their client "has come into contact with presidential candidates from both parties" — but insisted
that the contact involved the politicians' roles as "elected officials — not as candidates." The lawyers'
abrupt disclosure came shortly after The Washington Examiner reported that Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael
Atkinson told lawmakers the whistleblower worked "or had some type of professional relationship" with one of the Democratic
presidential candidates, citing three sources familiar with Atkinson's interview with lawmakers on Friday.
'Whistleblower' Redacted Third Fact Suggesting Potential Bias Against Trump. The New York Times reported
that, along with the intelligence officer "whistleblower" being a registered Democrat and having a "professional
relationship" with a 2020 Democrat, there remains a third redacted reason critics could accuse him of "potential bias" when
submitting his complaint to the Intelligence Community inspector general. The Washington Examiner's Byron York
reported Tuesday [10/8/2019] that the intelligence officer "whistleblower" had a "professional relationship" with a 2020
Democrat presidential candidate and was a registered Democrat, which critics could use to accuse the "whistleblower" of bias
against President Donald Trump and his administration.
Anti-Trump Ukrainian Ambassador Was Monitoring Communications of John Solomon and US Journalists Prying into Ukraine! Last
week House Democrats called in fired US Ambassador Marie Yovanovich to testify in their sham impeachment proceedings. Ambassador Yovanovich
is a noted Trump-hater who blocked Ukrainian officials from traveling to the United States to hand over evidence of Obama misconduct during
the 2016 election to President Trump. Yovanovich was US ambassador to Ukraine during the 2016 election when the Ukrainian government
was colluding with the DNC and Hillary Campaign to undermine the US presidential election. Ukrainian Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenkoko
told journalists in March that Yovanovitch gave him a "do not prosecute" list during their first meeting. The president ordered her
removal from her post in Ukraine in May 2019. She was openly anti-Trump.
Reports: Ukraine Investigation into Burisma/Biden Was Re-Opened in February 2019. Journalist John Solomon
appeared on Fox News with Sean Hannity last night to drop a considerably important revelation. According to Solomon's
reporting the White House has open-sourced evidence that Ukraine re-opened their investigation into Burisma Holdings and
Hunter Biden in February 2019; several months before President Trump spoke to President Zelenskyy.
Whistleblower Wrote 'Dramatic' Memo After Ukraine Call; Has Ties to 2020 Dem Candidate. The anti-Trump
"whistleblower" is a registered Democrat who reportedly has a significant tie to one of the 2020 Democratic presidential
candidates. Also, according to Fox News, he wrote a "dramatic" but inaccurate two-page memo on July 26, the day after
the Trump-Zelensky phone call. Immediately following his chat with an unidentified White House official about President
Trump's telephone with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky," the so-called IC whistleblower wrote what Fox News described
as a "dramatic personal memo," alleging that the White House official characterized the call as "crazy" and "frightening."
Try Again! The #Resistance and Impeachment. We are now into the second collusion story and (at least) the
second attempt at impeachment, now featuring a second "whistleblower" and counting. If the #Resistance had a motto it
would have to be "If at first you don't succeed, try, try again." The Washington establishment and their cheering
section wearing pajamas in mom's basements across America have been trying to remove President Trump from office since the
moment he was elected. First they went for a recount in Michigan. That didn't change the outcome, though it did
uncover an inconvenient truth — the number of votes counted in Detroit exceeded the number of registered
voters. Oops. Losing on the recount front, they tried to bribe, cajole, and threaten presidential electors to
ignore the will of the people.
had 'professional' tie to 2020 Democratic candidate. In an Aug. 26 letter, the Intelligence Community's
inspector general, Michael Atkinson, wrote that the anonymous whistleblower who set off the Trump-Ukraine impeachment fight
showed "some indicia of an arguable political bias ... in favor of a rival political candidate." A few weeks later,
news reports said the whistleblower's possible bias was that he is a registered Democrat. That was all. [...] Now,
however, there is word of more evidence of possible bias on the whistleblower's part. Under questioning from
Republicans during last Friday's impeachment inquiry interview with Atkinson, the inspector general revealed that the
whistleblower's possible bias was not that he was simply a registered Democrat. It was that he had a significant tie
to one of the Democratic presidential candidates currently vying to challenge President Trump in next year's election.
Whistleblower Attorney Worked Directly For James Clapper. One of the attorneys representing the anonymous
"whistleblowers" accusing President Donald Trump of conspiring with foreign leaders to interfere in the next U.S.
presidential election used to report directly to former director of national intelligence James Clapper. Charles
McCullough, an attorney now representing the whistleblowers with Andrew Bakaj, a former staffer for Sens. Chuck Schumer
and Hillary Clinton, was previously the inspector general of the intelligence community (ICIG) at the height of the Clinton
Had 'Professional' Tie to a 2020 Democratic Candidate. As the impeachment battle continues, a huge bombshell
was revealed Tuesday afternoon when Byron York reported at the Washington Examiner that the whistleblower whose complaint
resulted in the current impeachment inquiry isn't just a registered Democrat, but had a professional relationship with one of
the 2020 Democratic presidential candidates.
If House Impeaches Trump, 'Here Is What I'm Going to Insist Upon...' Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), as
chairman of the Judiciary Committee, has subpoena power. So will he subpoena the whistleblower who complained, based on
second-hand information, about President Trump's July 25 phone call with the Ukraine's newly elected president? "Well,
here is what's going to happen," Graham told "Sunday Morning Futures" with Maria Bartiromo: [Video clip]
["]If the whistleblower's allegations are turned into an impeachment article, it's imperative that the whistleblower
be interviewed in public, under oath and cross-examined. Nobody in America goes to jail or has anything done to them
without confronting their accuser. So here is what I'm going to insist upon, that the whistleblower, one or two,
whatever, they come forward, under oath, testify, so the public can judge their credibility. If that doesn't happen in
the House, I will make sure it happens in the Senate.["]
Speaker Nancy Pelosi Rules for Impeachment — 116th Congress. Sometimes dates are just data-points.
However, sometimes data-points help structure information timelines showing a connection between two seemingly disparate events.
When this happens, dates start to tell a story. The CIA operative "whistle-blower" letter to House Intelligence Committee
Chairman Adam Schiff, and Senate Intel Chair Richard Burr, was on August 12th. Now here's Speaker Pelosi's modified House
rules for impeachment [116th Congress].
Perry says he 'absolutely' asked Trump to call Zelensky — just not about the Bidens. US Energy
Secretary Rick Perry said Monday that he "absolutely" asked President Donald Trump "multiple times" to call Ukrainian
President Volodymyr Zelensky, but about energy — not the Bidens — and said he is not leaving his role
in the administration. Speaking at a press conference in Vilnius, Lithuania, Perry said that he told Trump that it was
in the best interest of the two nations to have discussions regarding energy issues. His response comes on the heels of
reports that Trump told lawmakers Perry urged him to make the July 25 call that has become a key focus of House Democrats'
impeachment inquiry into the President.
House Republicans Move to Censure Adam Schiff. Eighty-seven House Republicans have joined the movement to
rebuke Rep. Schiff by cosponsoring House Freedom Caucus Chairman Andy Biggs' (R-AZ) H. Res. 604, according to a list
obtained by Breitbart News. H. Res. 604 would condemn Schiff for retelling a fabricated conversation between Zelensky
exaggerations stand in stark contrast to Democrats' actual lies. The most brazen falsehoods come from the House
Intelligence Committee Chair, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.). Schiff promised evidence of Trump colluding with the Russians
in 2016 and failed to produce any. Then in the "official" impeachment inquiry hearings, Schiff opened the "show" with a
fabricated account of the discussion between Trump and Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky. Worse still, Schiff
failed to admit that the "whistleblower" had contact with his staff prior his formal complaint — he actually lied
about it. Schiff has since promised that the CIA agent-cum-whistleblower would testify, and so far, hasn't produced
Freshly Manufactured Whistleblowers, Blowing Smoke. All the distractions manufactured since his election
should plainly show everyone that these traitors had a machine in place that they had been fine-tuning for a mobster like
Hillary. But the people got to the polls and ruined that for them. We elected a man who had made all of his
fortune before he got to the Oval Office. We have yet to hear any explanations from the criminals who have made all of
their fortunes since they were given power.
could not explain 18-day window between Ukraine call and whistleblower complaint: sources. Intelligence
Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson, in testimony to House lawmakers about the whistleblower complaint on President
Trump's controversial phone call with his Ukrainian counterpart, could not explain what accounted for the 18-day window
between the July 25 call and the Aug. 12 complaint filing — or when exactly the whistleblower contacted a key
Democrat's staff, sources familiar with the testimony told Fox News. The whistleblower's contact with Intelligence
Committee Chairman Rep. Adam Schiff's staff before filing the complaint in mid-August has prompted renewed scrutiny of
Schiff. The top Democrat previously said "we have not spoken directly to the whistleblower," but his office later
revised the claim, saying that Schiff himself "does not know the identity of the whistleblower, and has not met with or
spoken with the whistleblower or their counsel" for any reason.
Atkinson Refuses to Tell Congress Why Whistleblower Rule Changes Were Backdated. Michael Atkinson, the
intelligence community inspector general (ICIG), reportedly refused to answer a key question during testimony before the
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) on Friday [10/4/2019]. Atkinson met with members of the committee in a
closed meeting to to answer questions related to the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump. When asked to
explain why his office made changes to its whistleblower forms in September and backdated those changes to August when the
anti-Trump "whistleblower" complaint was filed, Atkinson had no answer, Sean Davis reported at the Federalist on Monday.
He also reportedly admitted to lawmakers that the anti-Trump complainant had improperly concealed his previous secret
interactions with House Democratic staff prior to submitting the complaint.
administration blocks ambassador from testifying in House impeachment deposition. The Trump administration ordered
the U.S. ambassador to the European Union not to appear at a scheduled Tuesday [10/8/2019] deposition on the Ukraine controversy,
triggering a fiery new clash with House Democrats amid their impeachment inquiry. President Trump dismissed the deposition
as a "kangaroo court" as he defended the decision to block Gordon Sondland from appearing at the closed-door session on Capitol
Hill. But the move, first reported by the New York Times, prompted new warnings from Democrats that such acts will be seen
as an obstruction of their investigation into the controversy surrounding Trump's July 25 phone call with Ukrainian
President Volodymyr Zelensky.
is Built on a Trap That Obama Created for Romney. A whistleblower exposes structural waste, mismanagement and
abuse within the civil service, among government contractors and in varied ways within the private sector. This is
meant to protect employees who blow the whistle on misbehavior, not to serve as cover for assorted political agendas.
In the Trump era, whistleblowing and partisan leaks to the media have been conflated by the media. Partisan government
workers, some openly aligning with the "resistance" and participating in partisan groups within government agencies, have
sought to undermine administration policies through leaks. These leaks were in turn meant to generate congressional
investigations of cabinet officials. The impeachment effort against President Trump takes that ongoing tactic to the
Inspector General Atkinson's Coup. If there is no requirement for actually having witnessed the actions a
"whistleblower" is complaining about, complaints can include anything because the protections afforded a whistleblower
provides him not only anonymity but also immunity from any repercussions for making claims that aren't true —
absent provable malice, of course. Schiff recently justified keeping testimony to his sham "impeachment inquiry" secret
by saying that according to the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act, "The whistleblower has the right in the
statute to remain anonymous." The ability to remain anonymous, coupled with a presumption of purity and innocence, and
no firsthand knowledge requirement, means there is zero risk for the scurrilous among the administrative state in propagating
House Democrats Weigh Concealing Whistleblower's Identity from Republicans. House Democrats are considering
masking the identity of a partisan CIA officer behind a so-called "whistleblower" complaint regarding President Donald
Trump's telephone call with Ukraine from Republicans on Capitol Hill, according to a report. The Washington
Post, citing three officials familiar with the matter, said Monday that Democrats are concerned Republicans will leak
the so-called "whistleblower's" identify upon testimony before House and Senate investigators.
Democrats consider masking identity of whistleblower from Trump's GOP allies in Congress. House Democrats are
weighing extraordinary steps to secure testimony from a whistleblower whose complaint prompted their impeachment inquiry,
masking his identity to prevent President Trump's congressional allies from exposing the individual, according to three
officials familiar with the deliberations. The steps under consideration include having the whistleblower testify from
a remote location and obscuring the individual's appearance and voice, these officials said.
Community IG Stonewalling Congress On Backdated Whistleblower Rule Changes. In tense testimony before the House
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) on Friday [10/4/2019], the inspector general for federal spy agencies refused to
disclose why his office backdated secret changes to key whistleblower forms and rules in the wake of an anti-Trump whistleblower
complaint filed in August, sources told The Federalist. As The Federalist reported and the Intelligence Community Inspector
General (ICIG) confirmed, the spy watchdog secretly changed its whistleblower forms and internal rules in September to eliminate a
requirement that whistleblowers provide first-hand evidence to support any allegations of wrongdoing. In a press release
last week, the ICIG confessed that it changed its rules in response to an anti-Trump complaint filed on August 12. That
complaint, which was declassified and released by President Donald Trump in September, was based entirely on second-hand information,
much of which was shown to be false following the declassification and release of a telephone conversation between Trump and
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
Psychodrama 10.0? [Scroll down] The complaint file itself hardly seemed the work of a whistleblower. Instead,
in the style of the Steele dossier and the Mueller investigation, it footnoted liberal media sources as verification, cited past legal
rulings and cases, and seemed the work of progressive attorneys. Oddly, whistleblower forms had been mysteriously changed
retroactively to legitimize the complainant's charges on the basis of hearsay without the need for a single firsthand example of
direct knowledge of wrongdoing. Adam Schiff, to heighten the drama of the caper, opened a congressional hearing by reading
from the transcript of the Trump call to the Ukrainian president. Only he didn't. Instead he ad-libbed and recited a
fantasy version that contradicted the actual transcript in several places — much as the whistleblower complaint also
erred in key ways. When caught, he pled that he was offering a "parody" for effect. Schiff's staff, it may well
turn out, hand-in-glove coached the "whistleblower" well before he went public.
Fraternity and NeverTrump Sorority Collude in Impeachment Scam. The fabricated, make-believe scandal of Donald
Trump's telephone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky began unravelling before the ink was dry on the newspapers
reporting it. [...] "The official," intoned our fishwrap of record, "has more direct information about the events than the
first whistle-blower, whose complaint that Mr. Trump was using his power to get Ukraine to investigate his political
rivals touched off an impeachment inquiry." And just in case the anti-Trump bias of that was not sufficiently patent,
the [New York] Times helpfully provided this caption to a photo of the President: "President Trump pressured the
president of Ukraine to investigate the son of former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. during a phone call." Oh
really? In addition to assuming our stupidity and presuming on our patience, the Times apparently believes that
we cannot read. That call in July between Donald Trump and the Ukrainian President was about efforts to influence the
2016 election, not the 2020 election. How do we know? President Trump said so in his call.
First Ukraine Whistleblower [is] falling apart, so [the] media [is] inventing a Second Whistleblower. The New
York Times is continuing the tradition of the Russia collusion media frenzy, where every few days a new media "bombshell" was
launched, only to be revealed as a dud. By the time the bombshell was debunked, a new media bombshell was launched,
hence a new news cycle. [...] The case for the First "Whistleblower" is falling apart, with the revelation of previously
undisclosed pre-complaint communications with Adam Schiff's office, damaging testimony from the recently resigned special
envoy to Ukraine, and above all, the release of the complaint itself which demonstrated it was a professionally prepared
legal brief and closing argument not a true whistleblower revelation. Now the media is in search of a new whistleblower,
and the NY Times has found one to create another news cycle. Except this Second Whistleblower has not filed a
whistleblower complaint, but is only thinking about it according the the Times' sources.
says Schiff 'helped write' whistleblower complaint, after House panel admits advance knowledge. A spokesman for
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., acknowledged for the first time on Wednesday [10/2/2019] that
the whistleblower alleging misconduct in the White House had reached out to Schiff's panel before filing a complaint —
prompting President Trump, in an extraordinary afternoon news conference at the White House, to accuse Schiff directly of helping
write the document. Schiff had previously claimed in a televised interview that "we have not spoken directly with the
whistleblower." A Schiff spokesperson seemingly narrowed that claim late Wednesday, telling Fox News that Schiff himself
"does not know the identity of the whistleblower, and has not met with or spoken with the whistleblower or their counsel" for
lawyers are picking off Republicans to remove the President. The lawyers for the now-multiple whistleblowers
actively campaigned for whistleblowers. Mark Zaid, an activist attorney representing the two or more so-called
anonymous whistleblowers, co-founded Whistleblower Aid after President Trump was elected. The organization is a small
nonprofit that advertised all around D.C. actively seeking whistleblowers during the Trump administration. So, in
addition to John Brennan calling his minions to blow the whistle, the whistleblowers have lawyers who actively sought
whistleblowers to damage the President.
President: 'I Was Never Pressured' by Trump, 'No Conditions' Were Imposed. Ukrainian President Volodymyr
Zelensky on Saturday [10/5/2019] again denied having been put under any pressure by President Trump, during a July phone conversation, to
investigate Joe Biden or his son's business dealings in Ukraine — an allegation at the center of the Democratic
impeachment inquiry. In what was billed as his first major interview by non-Ukrainian media since the row erupted,
Zelensky was quoted as telling Japan's Kyodo News agency that neither his invitation to the White House nor the sale of
anti-tank missiles to Ukraine were made conditional on his willingness to cooperate in the Biden matter.
Wild Ukrainian Ride. Democrats threw the country into turmoil this week announcing their intention to proceed
with the impeachment of President Donald Trump. They just have a few problems. Chief among them, their narratives
keep collapsing. First, there was the "coverup" both of the call with the President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine, and
of the whistleblower's report. Then the White House, in an unprecedented step, released the transcript of the call with
the Ukrainian president, and the entirety of the whistleblower's report.
for Impeachment 'Whistleblowers' Actively Sought Trump Admin Informants. Mark Zaid, the activist attorney
representing the so-called whistleblower at the center of the impeachment movement targeting President Donald Trump, says he
is representing a second so-called whistleblower who spoke to the Intelligence Community's inspector general about Trump's
phone call with the Ukrainian president. Missing from the avalanche of news media coverage about Zaid's two anonymous
clients rocking the nation's capital is that at the beginning of Trump's presidency Zaid co-founded Whistleblower Aid, a
small nonprofit that blasted advertisements around D.C. actively seeking whistleblowers during the Trump administration.
of Progressive Projection. In truth, the "whistleblower" is no such thing. He or she is a disgruntled and
partisan intelligence bureaucrat, who violated the whistleblower statutes by first going to Rep. Adam Schiff's
(D.-Calif.) staff on the House Intelligence Committee to get help in translating his narrative into Mueller/Steele dossier
legalese, and in strategizing the timing of his accusations. Expect a series of John Brennan-surrogate intelligence
agency whistleblowers to follow once it is established that now hearsay is admissible and there is no downside to violating
the statutes by first conferring with Adam Schiff's staff.
The Democrats' Modus Operandi.
It turns out that the House Intelligence Committee chairman knew about the whistleblower before any whistle was blown —
and he sat on it. That is starting to look like the Democrats' modus operandi. The idea would be to more effectively
set up the President. We gained a classic glimpse of the m.o. during the confirmation hearing of Justice Kavanaugh.
That's when Senator Dianne Feinstein sat on a letter from Christine Blasey Ford alleging the future justice had behaved inappropriately
at a party two generations earlier. The letter reached the Coast Democrat on July 30, 2018. She sat on it, claiming
she wanted to respect the accuser's confidentiality.
If hearsay is the new standard, the whistleblowers will be coming out of the woodwork. Deep
State Attorney linked to Schumer and Hillary Confirms he Is Now Representing "Multiple" Whistleblowers in Connection to July 25 Trump
Call. As was reported in September[,] the Deep State "whistleblower" who spoke out on President Trump's call to the Ukrainian
President in July, but who was not on the call, hired a former Schumer and Hillary Clinton staffer, Andrew Bakaj to represent him/her.
Andrew Bakaj has deep ties with DC Democrats. He donated to Joe Biden's presidential campaign. His first "whistleblower" client
went to Adam Schiff's office to plot strategy before he filed his complaint. The first "whistleblower" is a partisan CIA operative who
was spying on President Trump in the White House. His complaints fell apart after President Trump released his phone transcript with
the Ukrainian president and after former envoy Kurt Volker's testimony on Thursday [10/3/2019].
Trump Knows Ukraine Owns
the Democrats. [Scroll down] The Democrats claim that Trump attempted to garner a bribe from Ukraine;
that he explicitly wanted damaging information on Joe Biden heading into the 2020 presidential campaign in exchange for
giving the $400 million (plus the lethal aid) to Ukraine. This does not appear to be the case at all. What's
more, the recently released encrypted text messages between Kurt Volker, Bill Taylor, and Gordon Sondland indicate that the
president and his team were less interested in damaging Joe Biden's presidential campaign than they were in getting to the
bottom of potential Ukrainian malfeasance (while using U.S. foreign aid as leverage to get Ukraine to shape up its behavior).
And, it should be noted here, the pursuit of corruption is a legitimate function of the U.S. government — and
since Donald Trump is the chief executive, he is well within his rights to inquire about potential corruption in foreign
countries with the leaders of those countries.
McCarthy: Pelosi Must Sideline Schiff Over Lies, Consider Him 'Fact Witness. House GOP leader Kevin
McCarthy said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi should formally sideline House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI)
chairman Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) from the Democrats' "impeachment inquiry" of President Donald Trump. McCarthy
explained Schiff should now be considered a "fact witness" in the broader investigation of these matters given his and his
staff's role in coordinating with the whistleblower over the summer.
Testimony Shows Schiff's First Impeachment Witness 'Put a Dagger' in His Lies, Narrative on Ukraine. Yesterday
[10/3/2019], former U.S. envoy to Ukraine Kurt Volker testified behind closed doors and in front of the House Intelligence
Committee for over nine hours. As reported, his testimony did not turn out to be what Democrats were looking for in
terms of pushing their "impeachment inquiry" narrative forward. According to Republican Congressman Lee Zeldin,
Volker's testimony "drove a dagger" in the argument that President Trump engaged in a quid pro quo with Ukraine by
threatening to withhold military aid unless former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter, were investigated.
Group Aiding Lawyers for 'Whistleblower' Tied to Democrats, Far-Left Organizations. One of the co-founders of
Whistleblower Aid previously worked at several liberal activist organizations financed by billionaire activist and Democratic
Party megadonor George Soros. The other co-founder currently leads a separate organization that boasts on its
four-person advisory board John Podesta, who led Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign, served as Chief of Staff to
Bill Clinton and founded the Soros-funded Center for American Progress pushing a progressive agenda. Working with the
so-called DC whistleblower's lawyers, Whistleblower Aid set up a GoFundMe page seeking to raise funds for the purported
Gowdy: Adam Schiff now a 'fact witness,' and GOP should call on him to testify about whistleblower.
Former Rep. Trey Gowdy said House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff has made himself a "fact witness" for how
he dealt with a whistleblower whose complaint raised concerns about whether President Trump pressured Ukraine to investigate
a political rival. The California Democrat is facing criticism for making misleading statements about what he knew of
the whistleblower after it was revealed he learned details about the unnamed CIA official's complaint before it was formally
filed and is creating doubt about whether he was the right choice to lead the Democrats' impeachment inquiry.
Challenging Adam Schiff
and Ted Lieu. At a September 26 hearing, Schiff, knowing Americans were watching on TV, read out an invented
summary of a transcript of a July 25 telephone call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in an attempt to
portray the U.S. president as a ruthless mafia don. In reality, Trump made no threats during the call. He told
Zelensky that he "heard you had a prosecutor who was very good and he was shut down and that's really unfair." He said former
federal prosecutor and former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani and U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr would call him. Barr, it
so happens, is conducting an investigation that deals with the 2016 U.S. election and Ukraine's connection to it.
May Have Jumped the Shark. Two stories today [10/2/2019] undermine the rush to impeach President Trump on the
Ukraine matter. The first concerns a difficult-to-understand detail in one of the early stories on the matter by
Kenneth Vogel of the New York Times. Vogel reported that the Ukrainians were unaware of the suspension of U.S.
military aid when Presidents Trump and Zelensky had their phone call on July 25. That detail has now been confirmed by
Christopher Miller, an expert reporter in Kyiv, in a Buzzfeed dispatch: "The Ukrainian government didn't know it was
being held up in Washington by Trump, according to the two Ukrainian officials. Nearly a month after the call —
which Zelensky has since described as 'good' and Trump has called 'perfect' — the Ukrainian government was left
stumped when they received word that the aid had in fact been suspended." Obviously, if Zelensky did not know about
the aid suspension, then the entire notion that the call was drenched in Trumpian mob-boss menace is wrong.
Dems: It's OK to ask for foreign help in a criminal justice investigation. President Trump's critics are
now complaining that he asked the Australian prime minister to cooperate with the Justice Department's investigation into the
origins of the Mueller probe and that Attorney General William Barr has traveled overseas to ask foreign intelligence
officials to cooperate with that investigation. The New York Times called it another example of "the president using
high-level diplomacy to advance his personal political interests." No, it's not. The president's critics are
conflating two different things: the investigation by Trump's private lawyer, Rudolph Giuliani, into Hunter Biden's business
dealings, and the inquiry by US Attorney John Durham into the counterintelligence investigation directed at the Trump campaign
during the 2016 election. The former is opposition research activity; the latter is a criminal justice matter.
Is This The Next Front In The Democrats' War on Trump? Is this the next front in the Left's impeachment push
against Trump? Right now, the president is under siege by Democrats because he had a phone call with Ukrainian
President Volodymyr Zelensky in July. The juicy story is that Trump, like a mob boss, threatened to withhold military
aid unless Zelensky opened a probe into possible corruption committed by Hunter Biden, who sat on the board of an energy
company. Hunter has zero experience in the energy sector. The allegation, and it's not far-fetched, is that he
was there selling access — all of this occurred under the Obama presidency. The Trump White House released
the transcripts and debunked the quid pro quo claims, but Democrats decided to launch an impeachment inquiry anyway without
reading the whistleblower complaint reportedly from a CIA agent, which started this whole circus.
Vince Foster, Klaus Eberwein, Shawn Lucas, Victor Thorn, and Jeffrey Epstein are unavailable for comment. Nancy
Pelosi: 'I'm Very Worried About the Security of the Whistleblower'. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) said on
Thursday that she is "very worried" about the security of the so-called "whistleblower." The speaker, who caved to the
far-left flank of her caucus and announced an impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump, said on Thursday that she is
"very worried" about the security of the "whistleblower," whose second-hand claims sparked the partisan impeachment effort.
Inspector General Michael Atkinson Admits 'Whistle-blower' Never Informed Him of Contact With Schiff Committee.
The inspector general for the Intelligence Community is Michael Atkinson. He is very sketchy. Atkinson was
previously legal counsel for the DOJ-NSD during the 'stop-Trump' tenure of John Carlin and Mary McCord. As a result,
Atkinson was a participant in the weaponizing of the DOJ-NSD via FISA abuse, along with NSA database exploitation and tenuous
FARA legal theories used to target political opposition. In short, Atkinson seems dirty. At the very least he
hangs around dirty characters.
'Whistleblower' Never Disclosed Contact with House Intel Panel to Inspector General. The partisan CIA officer
behind a so-called "whistleblower" complaint about President Donald Trump's telephone call with the leader of Ukraine
reportedly did not disclose his communications with a House Intelligence Committee staffer to the Intelligence Community
inspector general. According to Fox News reporter Catherine Herridge, inspector general Michael Atkinson told lawmakers
that he had "no knowledge" of the officer's contacts with the House Intel panel aide. This week, a New York
Times report revealed that the officer and staff member first discussed the allegations against the president before the
inspector general received the complaint.
Schiff gets 4 'Pinocchios' from Wa-Po for lie about whistleblower. House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam
Schiff was awarded four "Pinocchios" by The Washington Post for his comments about contact with the whistleblower. The
California Democrat claimed in an interview last month that the members of his panel "have not spoken directly" with the
person who filed the complaint about President Trump's call with the leader of Ukraine which has now led to an impeachment
inquiry by Democrats. The Washington Post fact-checker declared Schiff's statement was "flat-out false." "We
have not spoken directly with the whistleblower. We would like to," Schiff said on MSNBC last month when asked
about any interaction with the anonymous person.
Losing its Meaning Due to Impeachment Madness. I reflect on my own experience as a White House whistleblower.
I vividly recall the enormous feeling of helplessness coupled with something far more powerful. It was the sense of physically
being compelled to act, that the element of choice had been stripped away. It was enough to put everything on the line.
And it is something all bona fide whistleblowers have in common. It's a lonely place to be, a frightening place, too.
Yet today's White House whistleblower has had a different experience from all the rest. Allies appear to have been lined up
to assist, the skids were greased to move forward, the premise for blowing the whistle at all a concocted and rather flimsy one.
It strains credulity already and the story has not yet been fully told.
From Ukraine Envoy Kurt Volker Directly Contradicts Democrats' Impeachment Narrative. Congressional testimony
from the former top American envoy to Ukraine directly contradicts the impeachment narrative offered by congressional
Democrats and their media allies. Ambassador Kurt Volker, who served for two years as the top U.S. diplomatic envoy to
Ukraine, testified on Thursday [10/3/2019] that he was never aware of and never took part in any effort to push the Ukrainian
government to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden or his son Hunter. He also stressed that the interactions between
Giuliani and Ukrainian officials were facilitated not to find dirt on Biden, but to assuage concerns that the incoming Ukrainian
government would not be able to get a handle on corruption within the country.
IG Michael Atkinson Reveals Whistleblower Never Told Inspector General He Contacted Schiff's Committee.
Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson appeared on Capitol Hill Friday for his second closed-door meeting
with members of the House Intelligence Committee. Fox News reporter Catherine Herridge reported that Mr. Atkinson
revealed to lawmakers Friday that the 'whistleblower' never told him that he met with Adam Schiff's committee staffers.
Via Fox News Congress reporter Chad Pergram: Colleague Catherine Herridge rpts ICIG Atkinson told lawmakers the
whistleblower did not disclose to the ICI that he contacted Schiff's committee. Atkinson said the whistleblower
volunteered he was a registered Democrat[.]
Ratcliffe: Adam Schiff and HPSCI Committee Majority Must be Disqualified from Investigation. House
Judiciary Rep. John Ratcliffe rightly calls-out the unprecedented sketchy nature of a unilateral impeachment
process. The CIA 'whistle-blower' is a material witness in the intelligence committee investigation. The witness
had undisclosed contact with the House intelligence committee prior to filing a complaint. The Intelligence Community
Inspector General did not know about the whistle-blower contact with the committee. This sketchy assembly of activity
makes the HPSCI a fact-witness to their impeachment investigation; a constructed conflict that cannot be allowed.
the Story Is Written, the Whistleblower Will Just Be an Afterthought. Either the whistleblower's claims are
accurate, or they aren't. Impeachment will hinge upon whether President Trump's actions strike lawmakers as an effort
to effectively blackmail Ukraine into finding dirt on Joe Biden, or whether it's just Trump being Trump, wanting the facts on
Biden strong-arming a foreign government to fire a prosecutor who might have been investigating a company that employed his
son. The vast majority of lawmakers' conclusions on this will just happen to align with their partisan
affiliations. The whistleblower might be a really partisan individual, or the whistleblower might have no strong
political views and simply saw the president as crossing an ethical line in a way too egregious to remain silent. The
motive of the accuser doesn't make the accusation any more or less true or false.
Collusion With Whistleblower [is] the Last Straw. Perhaps House Intelligence Committee chairman Rep. Adam
Schiff (D-Calif.), would like to produce a transcript of his secret meeting with Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson at the
Aspen Security Forum in July 2018. [...] Like Schiff's Russian collusion delusion, Ukrainegate, to coin a phrase, is a made
up scandal involving a questionable document with unverifiable or incorrect statements and allegations, chock-full of made up
stuff and hearsay. Like the Steele dossier produced through Fusion GPS, the Ukraine "whistleblower's" letter to the
inspector general is largely unverifiable hearsay or outright fiction. Written by a CIA mole assigned to the White
House who was not in the room or on the call, it is designed for one purpose: to bring down a sitting and duly elected
president. Now we find that Adam Schiff and committee staff had a copy of the letters before it was submitted to the
I.G. On Wednesday, the New York Times published a report that Schiff "learned about the outlines of a C.I.A. officer's
concerns that President Trump had abused his power days before the officer filed a whistle-blower complaint."
Republicans Have Signed On to Condemn Adam Schiff. The movement to condemn House Intelligence Committee
Chairman Adam Schiff for making up a phone conversation President Trump never had with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky
just got stronger, as 45 Republicans have signed on.
Lawmakers Slam Democrats After Ukraine Envoy Kurt Volker's Testimony to Congress Is A Bust. Former Ukrainian
envoy Kurt Volker testified Thursday morning [10/3/2019] before the House Intelligence, Foreign Affairs, and Oversight
committees. Volker resigned from his post last week. Kurt Volker's name appeared in a partisan CIA
"whistleblower's" complaint against President Donald Trump's dealings with the Ukraine. [...] On Thursday during a break
several Republicans told reporters that Ambassdor Volker has said nothing that coincides with the Democrat Party's latest
House Intel Committee members speak out against chairman Adam Schiff. The Republican members of the House
Intelligence Committee are not holding back after it was revealed chairman Adam Schiff may have gone over their heads with
the whistleblower complaint. Congressman Devin Nunes, who serves as the ranking member, vented his frustrations
Wednesday. He said, "in light of this news, its hard to view impeachment as anything aside from an orchestrated farce."
Trump Is Absolutely Right To Assume Federal Agencies Are Against Him. The real scandal of the Ukrainian debacle
that continues to lead every cable broadcast is that, once again, the actions of unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats have
deeply affected an election in United States. In recent days, it has come out not only that the intelligence community
inspector general changed policy about secondhand information to fit this particular whistleblower complaint, but also that
the whistleblower him- or herself was working with House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff and House Democrats
before filing the complaint.
Schiff to Kevin McCarthy on Sept. 23: 'I Don't Know What's in the Whistleblower Report'. "I don't know what's
in the whistleblower report. But, I intend to find out," House Intelligence Committee Chair Rep. Adam Schiff
(D-Calif.) told House Minority Leader Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) on September 23, 2019. But, a New York Times
story published this week reports that Schiff had, indeed, been briefed on the general content of the whistleblower's complaint
before that time.
is a registered Democrat, new leak reveals. CNN reported Thursday [10/3/2019] on the unnamed CIA officer's
voter registration record. 'A source familiar with the whistle-blower investigation tells me that the political bias
referred to by the Intelligence Community Inspector General is that the whistleblower is a registered Democrat,' CNNs Jake
Tapper said on the air. 'That is the bias.' He also said the inspector general concluded that the whistle-blower's
political offiliation didn't change the facts in his complaint.
Effect of Ukrainegate. Wary political commentators on the Right have noted that the ginned up outrage over
President Trump's call with the Ukranian president serves two political purposes: One, to supply the impeachment goods
that Special Counsel Robert Mueller could not deliver and two, to obfuscate the ongoing investigations led by Attorney
General William Barr into how the Obama White House unleashed the country's most powerful government agencies against the
Trump presidential campaign in 2016. There is, however, a third motive behind the nonstop cacophony over Trump's call
and subsequent "whistleblower" report: To anesthetize the American public when the verdicts of Barr's inquiries,
currently underway by multiple authorities at the Justice Department, are rendered.
Walls Really are Closing In On the Elite. A two-year investigation by Robert Mueller and his massive staff
could not induce Pelosi to move on impeachment, but the whistleblower report could and did? The report itself is
nothing more than a motley collection of hearsay and publicly available media reports. In short order we learned that
the intelligence community had secretly altered its whistleblower rules to allow for complaints based on hearsay only days
before this report was submitted.
Congressional Dems Ask Trump State Dept for Ukrainian Docs — Get Crooked Hillary and Biden Docs
Instead!. Yesterday [10/1/2019], Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced he would refuse to allow State
Department officials to testify before the Congressional committees on impeachment. [...] Today the State Department sent
over the documents and announced they would brief Congress on their findings. But the documents weren't what the
Democrats were expecting! The Trump administration sent over documents on Hillary Clinton's collusion with Ukraine in
the 2016 election and the Biden Family's massive pay-for-play with the Ukrainian regime!
did not follow normal protocol; may have been illegal. Precedent for filing a whistleblower complaint requires
that the complainant is a first-hand witness to the alleged offense or suspected wrongdoing. Criteria that were changed
in an amended policy procedure, giving the whistleblower the option of being either a firsthand or secondhand (or more)
witness. In normal legalize, testimony from someone who was not a firsthand witness is known as hearsay. The
so-called whistleblower complaint filed against the Trump administration gives the appearance of impropriety on many fronts.
Deep State Collusion. Leftist conspiracy-monger Adam Schiff was aware of select details of the Ukraine-Biden
allegations against President Donald Trump before a lying CIA snitch reportedly involved in the case filed a complaint under
a whistleblower law, according to the intermittently reliable New York Times. It has been widely reported that the CIA
official's complaint was based on a July 25 telephone conversation between Trump and Ukrainian President Ukrainian President
Volodymyr Zelensky that the said stoolie somehow learned about. Rep. Schiff is the California Democrat, now the
laughably unqualified chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, a Trump-hater who spent the last
three years smearing anyone who doubts the existence of his Trump-Russia electoral collusion conspiracy theory as traitors
and agents of the Russian government while apparently leaking secret details of congressional investigations to his friends
at CNN and elsewhere in the media at every opportunity.
nonsense: Pelosi and Schiff are madly wagging the dog. Robert Mueller's $40M "investigation" into Trump's
supposed Russian collusion was in the end a cover-up operation that came up with nothing with which to charge Trump, let
alone impeach him. Rep. Jerry Nadler's committee opened an inquiry to see if the president had committed any
impeachable crimes, which was ultimately a fishing expedition. Then the oleaginous Rep. Adam Schiff came up with a
new plan of attack. Over the span of a few weeks, he crafted a complaint behind the scenes with a partisan CIA spy and
leaker who has an obvious axe to grind. They called this spy a "whistleblower," then changed the rules that previously
required a whistleblower to have firsthand knowledge about the nature of his complaint before releasing his statement of
charges to Congress. This person, "not a direct witness," had no such knowledge of President Trump's phone calls, and
his complaint is mostly hearsay and rumor.
Now Says He Should Have Been Much More Clear About Whistleblower Contacting Democrat Staffer. "Have you heard
from the whistleblower?" MSNBC contributor Sam Stein asked House intelligence committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) on
September 17, nine days before the complaint was released to the public. "We have not spoken directly with the
whistleblower," Schiff responded at the time, never mentioning that one of his committee staffers had directly spoken
to the whistleblower — and that the staffer "shared some of what the [whistleblower] conveyed" with Schiff,
according to the New York Times. The New York Times says the staffer referred the whistleblower to a (Democrat-connected)
attorney to help him file a formal complaint with the intelligence community inspector general.
Erupt After Report Reveals Schiff Knew of Whistleblower Complaint Before Filing. Republican congressional
leaders accused Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and Democrats of rigging the impeachment scheme after news broke that Schiff
was in contact with the whistleblower before the complaint against President Donald Trump was filed. The report from
the New York Times claimed that Schiff received an "early account by the future whistleblower" days before the person filed
the complaint accusing Trump of presidential misconduct.
chiefs altered more than just the rules about firsthand knowledge to file a whistleblower report. We already
know that the Intelligence Community's inspector general (ICIG) office mysteriously changed its rules for anyone filing a
whistleblower complaint to not needing to have one's information firsthand just before the famed whistleblower filed his
report sometime around August. Now it comes to light that this same intelligence committee inspector general's office
changed its rules after the whistleblower complaint was filed, not before. And they changed the rules to accommodate
the embittered anti-Trump intelligence official, Davis reported.
Conspiracies are Broad and Deep. [Scroll down] Beyond the risibility of Pelosi's concern for the
Constitution, I refused to accept their premise that Trump was acting solely to benefit his 2020 election chances. He
was, instead, I argued, on a mission to discover the origins of the now-debunked Russiagate Operation as well as rooting out
the Obama Administration's corrupt past involvement in Ukrainian affairs. And this really goes to the heart of the
American divide on Operation Ukraine. For those on the Political Left, who view Trump as a self-seeking traitor, this
latest effort is merely the continuation of Operation Russiagate. For Trump supporters, however, the transcript of
Trump's phone call revealed a seemingly earnest effort to fulfill his 2016 campaign promises of draining the swamp and
making America great again. The American rift is, indeed, very real and the breach is growing wider.
Evidence Obama Colluded With Ukraine. On Monday night [9/30/2019] with Sean Hannity, [Rudy] Giuliana [sic] said
there's significant evidence the Obama White House ordered Democrats to go in cahoots with Ukraine in order to get dirt on
then-candidate Trump: "The reason why the President of the United States had an obligation to ask the president of
Ukraine to follow up on these allegations because there is substantial — I don't want to exaggerate it but pretty
close to overwhelming evidence, including a finding by a Ukrainian court that Hillary Clinton and the Democrats cooperated
with Ukrainians with the order coming directly from the White Hous [sic] ...to dig up dirt on her political opponent, and
they did." So it's a Ukrainian extravaganza. One person who surely isn't enjoying the festivities: Joe
Biden. The Dems' obsession is cookin' his goose.
Admit Adam Schiff Lied, But You Are A Hack If You Care. If Donald Trump does nothing else from this point
forward, his exposing of the legacy media will have still been worth it all. The latest evidence of that comes courtesy
the news that Rep. Adam Schiff lied about having prior contact with the whistle-blower in the Trump-Ukraine
matter. Originally, Schiff claimed "we" (i.e. Congress and his staff) had no contact. That never added up
because Schiff tweeted out some of the contents of the complaint weeks before he was supposed to know about. Now we
know why. The whistle-blower went to a Congressional aide first, who told Schiff of the issue. That led to legal
advice being passed back down the chain. Whether there was further coordination in actually formulating the complaint,
we don't know yet (you can bet that happened though). What we do know is that Schiff lied and that he did have advanced
knowledge to help him strategically roll all this nonsense out.
case of the so-called Ukraine whistleblower scandal. Make no mistake, part of the goal of the Democrats ever
since Donald Trump was elected by your votes to become president of the United States has been to exhaust and punish
you. The president has always been just a proxy for you, the actual focus of the Democrats' rage and contempt.
It's not surprising the Democrats now have resorted to what appears to be another hoax, designed with the same template as
their "Russia dossier" debacle. In the case of the so-called Ukraine whistleblower scandal, it appears they have
fabricated a web of complaints and accusations attempting to turn the normal duties of the president into crimes so they can
remove him from office. In other words, the soft coup continues.
Party of 'Impeach!' The Democrats' purported outrage about President Donald Trump's phone call with Ukrainian
president Volodymyr Zelensky might be taken seriously by the Republicans were it not for the Democrats' drive to oust Trump
from the moment he won the presidency. CNN's Van Jones, with zero proof, attributed Trump's victory to "whitelash."
Trump received 57% of the white vote, actually a lower percentage of the white vote than the 59% received by Mitt Romney, the
Republican presidential candidate in 2012. In 2008, Democrat Barack Obama received a greater percentage of the white vote
than John Kerry did four years earlier. Obama also received 95% of the black vote. None dared call it "blacklash."
lies about no advance knowledge of Whistleblower complaint make the impeachment efforts look like a conspiracy. When
wrongdoing by Democrats is discussed, the media like to call charges against them "conspiracy theories," implying that crazed partisans
are imagining phony connections where none in fact exist. But when people with no visible connection with each other work together
in secret to accomplish some goal and then lie about their collaboration, the dreaded word "conspiracy" becomes completely appropriate.
And that's what the charges that Nancy Pelosi tasked Adam Schiff's House Intelligence Committee (and 5 other House committees) with
investigating, with an eye toward impeaching President Trump, now look like. A conspiracy including one or more Deep State
operatives within the White House who acted as spies on a confidential conversation between two heads of state, and a separate
intelligence officer who composed a "whistleblower" complaint with the help of Schiff's staffers and a lawyer or lawyers unknown.
the whistleblower went to Adam Schiff first, not the designated intelligence authorities? Remember when the
same was said of then-Private Bradley Manning, who leaked troves of military secrets to Wikileaks before being packed off to
Leavenworth? He should have gone through channels... The idea, of course, is that these people shouldn't have been
addressing the issues they claimed to have motivated them to do their dirty betrayals the way they did, there were plenty of
internal procedures to work with and they didn't bother. Turns out we got another one, according to a report from Sean
Davis the Federalist, citing reporting at the New York Times -- the impeachment 'whistleblower' -- who seems to have
gone to congressional Democrats first, not the intelligence inspector general (IGIC), or for that matter two other agencies which
dismissed his or her secondhand complaints out of hand.
trouble for Democrats' Trump-Ukraine case. News that Washington didn't tell Ukraine it was delaying aid until a
month after President Trump's phone call to its leader punches a gaping hole in Democrats' impeachment case. On
Wednesday [10/2/2019], BuzzFeed reported that Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky believed $391 million in military funding
was already headed to Kiev when he chatted with Trump in August. Dems charge the prez held up the money to pressure
Zelensky to probe Joe Biden and his son. Hard to see how that works when Zelensky didn't know about the aid holdup.
This follows the awkward fact that several of the whistleblower's other claims about that call aren't borne out by the transcript.
Schiff Hid CIA Whistleblower Concerns from Republicans on Intelligence Committee. Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA)
said in a statement: ["]We learn from the press today that Chm Schiff had prior knowledge and involvement in the
[whistleblower] complaint. He withheld this info from the American people and even from the Intel Cmte. In light
of this news, it's hard to view impeachment as anything aside from an orchestrated farce.["] Rep. Elise
Stefanik (NY), another Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, confirmed Schiff kept the information from Republicans
and called upon him to step down.
More information is coming out about the "whistleblower" — read, Democratic Party activist — who
triggered impeachment mania, and it does not put the Democrats in a positive light. The New York Times reports that the
"whistleblower" has long been working with Congressional Democrats: [...] So a great deal has been going on behind the
scenes. The complaint was filed in August, so Schiff had known about it for a month and a half before it became
public. This means that the leaders of the Democratic Party had lots of time to coordinate the rollout of the
impeachment drama. Which, in turn, explains my observation that within hours after Nancy Pelosi announced the launching
of an impeachment inquiry, I was getting emails from Democratic politicians with coordinated talking points, demanding that
the president be impeached.
'This Is a Fraudulent Crime on the American People'. The impeachment inquiry regarding President Donald Trump's
phone call with Ukraine is "a hoax," the president said Wednesday [10/2/2019] during a joint press conference with Finland
President Sauli Niinistö. When asked whether the president is planning to cooperate with the three House Intelligence
Committees looking into the impeachment inquiry that are planning to send a subpoena to the White House for documents and other
materials, Trump said, "I always cooperate."
Panics After Bombshell Reveal He Got Early Account of CIA Spy's Accusations — Claims He Has Never Spoken to
Whistleblower. House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff is in damage control mode after the New York Times
reported that he learned about the Deep State CIA spy's accusations against President Trump several days before the officer
filed a whistleblower complaint. The Deep State spook filed a complaint on August 12 based on second-hand knowledge and
hearsay of Trump's July 25 phone call to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, so Schiff had knowledge of the accusations
and worked discreetly for up to two weeks. Schiff is now claiming he has never met with or spoken to the whistleblower —
in fact, Schiff is claiming he doesn't even know the identity of the whistleblower!
Whistleblower Colluded With House Democrats Before Filing Complaint. An anti-Trump whistleblower at the center
of ongoing Democratic efforts to impeach President Donald Trump coordinated with Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and his
Democratic staff prior to filing his whistleblower complaint, The New York Times reported on Wednesday afternoon. The
bombshell report that the whistleblower and his Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) colleagues actively worked exclusively with
congressional Democrats before filing the complaint raises serious questions about whether the complainant followed federal
laws providing whistleblower protections for employees within the U.S. intelligence community. "Before going to
Congress, the C.I.A. officer had a colleague convey his accusations to the agency's top lawyer," The New York Times
reported. "Concerned about how that avenue for airing his allegations was unfolding, the officer then approached a
House Intelligence Committee aide, alerting him to the accusation against Mr. Trump."
Adam Schiff Knew About Whistleblower Complaint Before It Was Filed. Well, this whole impeachment circus just
got shadier. [...] House Democrats decided to execute their impeachment plan, which has been in the works since 2016, over
Trump's alleged shakedown of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. According to the liberal media, Trump threatened
to withhold military aid unless the Ukrainians opened a corruption probe into Hunter Biden's position on the board of an
energy company, which many see as a move to sell access to his father, Joe Biden, who was vice president at the time.
Zelensky never felt pressured. There was no mentioning of aid. There was no quid, so the quid pro quo is another
belly flop by the anti-Trump media establishment. Still, do we have Democrat-Intelligence Community collusion here?
Community Admission Of Whistleblower Changes Raises Explosive New Questions. On Monday [9/30/2019], the
intelligence community inspector general (ICIG) admitted that it did alter its forms and policies governing whistleblower
complaints, and that it did so in response to the anti-Trump complaint filed on Aug. 12, 2019. [...] The ICIG also disclosed
for the first time that the anti-Trump complainant filed his complaint using the previously authorized form, the guidance for
which explicitly stated the ICIG's previous requirement for firsthand evidence for credible complaints. The Federalist
reported last week that it was not known which form, if any, the complainant used, as the complaint that was declassified and
released to the public last week was written as a letter to the two chairmen of the congressional intelligence committees.
Have Every Reason To Be Suspicious Of The Whistleblower Complaint. We're supposed to accept that this is what
happened, that what the anti-Trump whistleblower complaint describes is confirmed by the unredacted and publicly released
transcript of Trump's July 25 phone call with Zelensky. We're not supposed to question the veracity of the
whistleblower's complaint or the purity of the whistleblower's motives. And we're definitely not supposed to question
why the standards for submitting whistleblower complaints were changed just last month to allow complaints based on
secondhand information to be deemed credible. In other words, we're not supposed to question whether this whole thing
has been a political hit job from the start. Well, forgive us if we pause. Just like the Clinton campaign-funded
Steele dossier that launched the Russia probe, the Ukraine complaint is based entirely on hearsay and contains blatant
falsehoods and misstatements of fact.
Whistleblower Fueling the 'Conspiratorial Fire' of the 'Deep State' Trying to Overthrow Trump. Former Director
of National Intelligence James Clapper said that there isn't a "deep state" effort to undermine President Donald Trump but
the whistleblower complaint about his call with the Ukraine president from someone in the intelligence community "fuels that
conspiratorial fire." "Well, I never heard of the term deep state, maybe I was, you know, ignorant or bliss or something,
but I never heard of that until the campaign and afterwards. Allegedly this is a conspiracy of career government public
servants who somehow organize themselves into a conspiracy to undermine or overthrow the president, which on its face is
ridiculous," Clapper said during the Washington Post's Cybersecurity Summit on Wednesday [10/2/2019].
Barr and John Durham Listened to Mifsud Audio-Tape Deposition in Italy. When reports first surfaced that AG
Bill Barr had traveled to Italy recently, we surmised the trip was likely related to Joseph Mifsud; specifically related to
an audio-taped deposition that Mifsud gave to Italian police about being a western intelligence asset who was enlisted by the
CIA (Brennan) to run a covert intelligence operation against the Donald Trump campaign in 2016. If accurate, well,
there's the motive for the latest "CIA whistle-blower" approach.
Went to Rome to Hear a Secret Tape From Joseph Mifsud, the Professor Who Helped Ignite the Russia Probe. When
Attorney General William Barr showed up at the U.S. embassy's Palazzo Margherita here on tony Via Veneto last week, he had
two primary requests. He needed a conference room to meet high-level Italian security agents where he could be sure no
one was listening in. And he needed an extra chair for U.S. Attorney John Durham of Connecticut, who would be sitting
in as his right-hand man. Barr was in Rome on an under-the-radar mission that was only planned a few days in
advance. An official with the embassy confirmed to The Daily Beast that they had to scramble to accommodate Barr's
sudden arrival. He had been in Italy before, but not with such a clear motive.
Impeachment by Innuendo Continues. Both Trump-Russia (obstruction) and Trump-Ukraine (corruption) have similar
footprints because they both held the same end-goal purpose, impeachment. Trump was framed for stealing a horse; Trump
was subsequently accused of trying too hard to avoid hanging for it. Mueller eventually conceded that Trump didn't
steal the horse; however, by then the focus was on his efforts to avoid hanging. Eventually Mueller testified; it
surfaced there was never a horse to begin with. Impeachment was stalled.
Gingrich says: "It's a Coup d'Etat, not an impeachment inquiry.". On Fox & Friends (10/01/2019) Former
Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich tells America's Newsroom host Sandra Smith that the Democrats are not conducting an
impeachment investigation as much as attempting a coup d' etat of the Trump Presidency. Something CommDigiNews writers
have been writing for months. Coup d'état is a sudden and decisive action in politics, especially one resulting
in a change of government illegally or by force. The South Carolina Senator is absolutely correct because of how Pelosi
is proceeding in this manner.
More Call Transcripts Will Cripple Future Presidents. The content of the Ukraine phone call, as unseemly as it
may be for President Donald Trump, will not be the basis of impeachment, the way Bill Clinton's "perjurious, false and
misleading testimony to the grand jury" was. Which is why House Democrats are utilizing it as pretext to fish the
whole expanse of the vast waters of presidential diplomatic communications with foreign leaders.
pay for impeachment. Democrats believe they can impeach President Donald John Trump with impunity. They
figure it will be like Clinton's one-day trial and acquittal, which would allow them to scream injustice from now until
forever. President Trump should extract the full price for their farce. Whilst the attorney general and inspector
general continue investigating Hillarygate and Muellergate, President Trump should have fun with this by forcing Democrats to
make their case to the American people. Just like they did with Clarence Thomas. Just like they did with Brett
Kavanaugh. That means putting the whistle blower on the stand. The Constitution requires the accuser to face
Schiff's Office Denies Conflict of Interest for Staffer on Think Tank Backed by Ukraine Gas Company. A
spokesman for Rep. Adam Schiff's House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence denied any impropriety related to a
trip taken by a staffer to Ukraine last month sponsored and organized by the Atlantic Council think tank. The Atlantic
Council is funded by and works in partnership with Burisma, the natural gas company at the center of allegations regarding
Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden. The Schiff staff member, Thomas Eager, is also currently a fellow at the Atlantic
Council's Eurasia Congressional Fellowship. Burisma in January 2017 signed a "cooperative agreement" with the Council
to sponsor the organization's Eurasia Center.
How Trump wins.
So it's time to play another card. Only this one wasn't quite ready. It wasn't supposed to be necessary because
the Mueller card was supposed to finish Trump off, but this one was put together hastily after Mueller's testimony to
Congress failed so miserably. Some of the bit players had their parts and knew their lines, but not all of them, which
is why the initial news differed so much from the reality. When the pseudo-transcript of the call was released,
everything hadn't been fully synchronized. It was clear that the stars of the show, Pelosi, Nadler, and Schiff, hadn't
seen the transcript yet but were familiar with the complaint. They had to make stuff up off the cuff, and it didn't
jibe with the facts. But lack of facts never stopped a Democrat, so they pressed onward, making sure they built some
time in, to clean things up. The two-week recess, while they say they'll still be working, is when they'll try to close
up their exposed rears.
Biden's Perfectly Legal, Socially Acceptable Corruption. How did this get to be standard practice?
The whistle-blower scandal that has prompted the fourth presidential impeachment process in American history has put a
spectacle from earlier this decade back on display: the jaw-smacking feast of scavengers who circled around Ukraine as Viktor
Yanukovych, a Moscow-linked kleptocrat, was driven from power. Ukraine's crisis was the latest to energize a club whose
culture has come to be treated as normal — a culture in which top-tier lawyers, former U.S. public officials, and
policy experts (and their progeny) cash in by trading on their connections and their access to insider policy information —
usually by providing services to kleptocrats like Yanukovych. The renewed focus on Ukraine raises jangling questions:
How did dealing in influence to burnish the fortunes of repugnant world leaders for large payoffs become a business model?
How could America's leading lights convince themselves — and us — that this is acceptable?
Tries To Wave Away IG Changes Allowing Whistleblowers To Weaponize Hearsay. After Federalist reporting
unearthed the Intelligence Community Inspector General's (ICIG's) material changes to its whistleblower complaint intake
procedures, a battle has ensued over whether the changes matter. This discovery continues to captivate elected
representatives, Capitol insiders, and political talking heads across the nation. [...] The detractors are right about one
thing: the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act (ICWPA) statute doesn't actually prohibit a purported
whistleblower from initiating a complaint based on hearsay. But the clear language of the previous IC IG guidance
never stated that it did.
It's Time to Follow Up on My July 2017 Letter About the DNC and Ukraine. While Democrats move forward on their
impeachment inquiry against President Trump, Republicans charge that the president is actually the victim here. In a
letter intended for Attorney General William Barr, Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and Ron Johnson (R-TX) ask for a renewed
investigation into the "brazen efforts by the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton campaign to use the government
of Ukraine for the express purpose of finding negative information on Trump." As Grassley and Johnson recall, the DNC
reportedly hired a Ukrainian-American operative named Alexandra Chalupa to investigate the Trump campaign's ties to Ukraine.
They first asked the DOJ to investigate back in July 2017, including allegations that Chalupa was looking into Paul Manafort's
relationship to Ukrainian officials. On Friday, they sent AG Barr a friendly reminder.
General's Ties Suggest Ukraine 'Scandal' is Just More Collusion Hoax. Michael Atkinson, the intelligence
community's inspector general at the center of the so-called "whistleblower" report, is earning Robert Mueller-level
adoration by the press. Atkinson, we are told, is a truth-seeker with no partisan agenda or political grudge.
"The intelligence community's chief watchdog, Michael Atkinson, is known to his peers and colleagues as a highly cautious
'straight shooter' who tends to keep his head down," cooed Politico reporter Natasha Bertrand on September 23.
Michael Atkinson Attempts Four-Page Justification for Changing "Urgent Concern" Whistle-blower Guidelines.
Prior to the current "whistle-blower complaint" the Intelligence Community Inspector General did not accept Urgent Concern
whistle-blower claims without first hand knowledge. However, the ICIG revised the protocol in August 2019 to accept a
CIA complaint against President Donald Trump. Today [9/30/2019] the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community,
Michael Atkinson, presented a four-page justification explaining why the IC changed the Urgent Concern rules to allow the CIA
to target President Trump with anonymous complaints based on hearsay: [...]
Davis: Democrats Have Committed, Are Committing Every Crime They Accuse Trump Of. 'The Federalist'
co-founder Sean Davis said we are now "through the looking glass" with Democratic party outrage at Attorney General Bill Barr
trying to get to the bottom of 2016 election meddling. In an interview with FOX Business Network host Lou Dobbs, Davis
said the whistleblower complaint against the president is full of errors and false statements. [Video clip]
Clinton and Russia didn't
take down Trump, so Democrats try Ukraine and impeachment. The impeachment nightmare that House Democrats are
so eagerly plunging the country into now is merely another outbreak of that party's inability to accept the voters' verdict
of 2016. Donald Trump's unlikely victory was so shocking for Hillary Clinton and her lazy, overconfident campaign team
and supporters that she was emotionally unable to compose herself for a concession speech until the next day. Which
suggests to many that voters made the correct choice for commander in chief, even if they have real doubts about Trump.
Ukrainian Leads. Americans often boast that we are a nation of laws, but for the moment laws appear to play a
decidedly secondary role in the drama we are living in and — hopefully — through. We have some
guidance from our foundational law, the Constitution, which tells us how to proceed: the House of Representatives has
"the sole power of impeachment," the Senate has "the sole power to try all impeachments," and must do so "on oath or
affirmation. The Senate cannot convict "without the concurrence of two-thirds of the members present."
Schiff Democrats operation destroy America Chapter 3: Impeachment. In Nancy Pelosi's own words, as read by
Rep. Devin Nunes at last weeks hearing, this is not about truth, facts or even crimes. It is about the Democrat
and liberal media "operation" to destroy the presidency of Donald Trump and nullify the rights of the American's who did dare
to vote for him. First, the claim was that President Trump somehow stole the election. That he was not duly
elected. Then it was the Russia Hoax. Now it's the Whistleblower fiasco. Democrats quest to impeach the
President has nothing to do with facts.
Civil War On.
Someone in Impeachmentville is not paying attention. [...] For instance, the matter of CrowdStrike. The cybersecurity
firm was co-founded by Russian ex-pat Dmitri Alperovitch, who also happens to be a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, an
anti-Russian think tank funded by Ukrainian billionaire, Viktor Pinchuk, who donated at least $25 million to the Clinton
Foundation before the 2016 election. Crowdstrike was the company that "examined" the supposedly hacked DNC servers,
while somebody in the Obama administration prevented the FBI from ever seeing them. Does this sound a little like part
of the origin story of RussiaGate? Is that not exactly the potential criminal matter that the current attorney general,
Mr. Barr, is officially investigating? Perhaps, under the year 2000 treaty, Mr. Trump was within his rights
to ask the new President of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelensky, for assistance on that.
A Seinfeld Impeachment
(It's About Nothing). In the week since I last wrote about the accusations made against President Trump as a
result of his July 25 telephone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, a lot has happened. Both the
rough transcript of the call and the "whistleblower complaint" that supposedly resulted from it have been released, and House
Speaker Nancy Pelosi has formally commenced impeachment proceedings against the president. Both the transcript and the
complaint are now required reading for anyone claiming to be politically informed. They raise a number of questions about
the conversation and the unidentified "whistleblower," but they manifestly do not demonstrate that Trump should be impeached.
From So-Called 'Whistleblower' Is Riddled With Gossip, Blatant Falsehoods. The formal complaint from an
anti-Trump "whistleblower" alleging various crimes by President Donald Trump is riddled with third-hand gossip and outright
falsehoods. The document was declassified by Trump Wednesday evening and released to the public Thursday morning.
The complaint, which was delivered to the chairmen of the House and Senate intelligence committees, follows the same template
used in the infamous and debunked Clinton campaign-funded Steele dossier. Rather than provide direct evidence that was
witnessed or obtained firsthand by the complainant, the document instead combines gossip from various anonymous individuals,
public media reports, and blatant misstatements of fact and law in service of a narrative that is directly contradicted by
underlying facts. A footnote in the document even boasts about its use of "ample open-source information."
Nancy Pelosi Now Supports Impeachment Even Though It's Insane. The latest Ukraine-related non-scandal is almost
irrelevant for its lack of substance. This is not about substance. This is about Pelosi losing control of her
caucus should she continue to resist impeachment, and Pelosi sensing a looming electoral disaster of monumental proportions
should impeachment be launched outside the parameters she defines. Having read the transcript of Trump's phone call
with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky, I can say there is literally nothing there. There is no mention of
military aid to Ukraine, of freezing or un-freezing of any aid, of any quid pro quo, or of any pressure on Zelensky to
do anything. I would argue that, given the nexus of the Biden family corruption to Ukraine, it is entirely proper for
Trump to ask Zelensky for help investigating the precise circumstances of the Biden family enrichment.
Rep. Brooks: 'Under the Sixth Amendment' the Whistleblower's Identity Should Be Revealed. Some are warning
of the worst should the identity of the so-called whistleblower behind a report alleging President Donald Trump committed
wrongdoing in a phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky be revealed. However, according to Rep. Mo
Brooks (R-AL), who has served as both a prosecutor and defense attorney prior to serving in the U.S. House of
Representatives, two of the key aspects of these allegations fail to meet standards for impeachment — the
transcript of the call, which he said showed nothing impeachable and the whistleblower report, which he said lacked
Graham: "Why Did They Change The Rules" Allowing Whistleblowers To Cite Hearsay? Senator Lindsey Graham
joined CBS's "Face The Nation" host Margaret Brennan to talk about the impeachment inquiry launched into President Trump this
week. "This seems to me like a political setup," Graham said about the whistleblower report that led Democrats to
launch the inquiry. "It's all hearsay. You can't get a parking ticket conviction based on hearsay. The
whistle-blower didn't hear the phone call." "Every American deserves to confront their accuser. So this is a
sham, as far as I'm concerned. I want to know who told the whistle-blower about the phone call. I want to know
why they changed the rules about whistle-blowers not — the hearsay rule was changed just a short period of time
before the complaint was filed," Graham wondered.
criminality': Top Republicans push watchdog on timing of changes to whistleblower complaint form. House
Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy of California, Rep. Devin Nunes of California, the top Republican on the House
Intelligence Committee, and Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio, the top GOP lawmaker on the House Oversight Committee, wrote to
Inspector General Michael K. Atkinson to demand information related to the decision to loosen whistleblower reporting
requirements so that non-firsthand accounts would be accepted. The change to the reporting requirement was made in
August, the same month a whistleblower reported Trump's July 25 call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. The
whistleblower did not hear or see the call first hand and his complaint was leaked to the news media. Democrats who first
heard about the call through leaks to the media announced they have launched a formal impeachment inquiry into Trump's behavior.
Lawmakers Tell Intel Community Inspector General: Come Clean On Secret Changes To Whistleblower Rules.
Republican lawmakers in both the Senate and House on Monday demanded answers from the Intelligence Community Inspector
General (ICIG) about secret revisions to the office's guidance on "urgent concern" whistleblower complaints. The
Federalist first reported last week that between May 2018 and August 2019, the ICIG secretly eliminated its requirement that
potential whistleblowers provide only first-hand evidence of alleged wrongdoing. In their letter to Michael Atkinson,
the ICIG, Reps. Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), and Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) noted that the anti-Trump
complainant offered no direct, first-hand evidence of alleged wrongdoing against President Donald Trump. Instead, the
complaint is littered with gossip, hearsay, and rumor. The lawmakers specifically asked the ICIG to explain when the
whistleblower guidance was revised, by whom, and for what reason.
Maybe he's in a cell in that place in New York, where the guards are asleep and the cameras don't work. Report:
Anti-Trump Whistleblower Under Federal Protection Over Safety Fears. CBS News' 60 Minutes reported Sunday night
the anti-Trump whistleblower whose complaint sparked the impeachment probe against Trump is under federal protection,
according to a reading of a letter sent by one of the whistleblower's attorneys, Andrew Bakaj. The Intelligence
Community Inspector General who received the complaint determined the whistleblower is biased against Trump, finding "some
indica of an arguable political bias on the part of the Complainant in favor of a rival political candidate."
Different Day. While peddling the Russia hoax, Schiff claimed repeatedly there was "evidence of collusion" but
as the Mueller Report made clear, no collusion was found. Schiff also said the Russia hoax was "of a size and scope
probably beyond Watergate." Reminder for Schiff, there was no collusion and no obstruction. Now Schiff has found
a new tale to slander President Trump with after lying to the country for over two and a half years about Russia without any
consequences. And like clockwork, Schiff started pushing his Ukraine smear by lying right out of the gate by
fabricating what was said on the call between President Trump and the Ukrainian president.
Fox, Mark Levin Slams Press Lies, Impeachment by Anonymous Source. Fox & Friends invited author and
national talk-show host Mark Levin on Sunday [9/29/2019] to discuss the budding effort by House Democrats to impeach
President Trump. Levin ripped the media repeatedly, and protested the idea that the Democrats are going to try and
remove the president from office by using an anonymous "whistleblower" who didn't even have first-hand access to the events
that are allegedly impeachable. Levin told Ed Henry, "You know, Ed, I've been watching you and a lot of reporters, and you
haven't once asked for the identity of the so-called whistleblower. Why is that?" Henry said "I want to know the identity."
Hewitt: Adam Schiff Has 'Destroyed His Credibility' in Impeachment Inquiry. Conservative radio host Hugh
Hewitt had some intriguing comments on Sunday [9/29/2019] during a Meet the Press discussion about the renewed efforts
by House Democrats to impeach President Donald Trump. As the panel discussed the public support for an inquiry of Trump
in light of the Ukraine scandal, Hewitt went after House Intelligence Committee chairman Adam Schiff, who spoke to Chuck Todd
earlier in the show about whether Rudy Giuliani will be asked to testify before Congress. Hewitt took a negative view
on how that discussion went, saying Schiff "went full Alice in Wonderland Queen of Hearts: Verdict first, trial later."
I Think Trump Did Nothing Wrong in His Phone Call with Zelensky. I had a great discussion on The Editors
Thursday about my view that President Trump did nothing wrong in his July 25 phone call with Ukrainian president Volodymyr
Zelensky. My view seems to be the minority position, so it makes sense to lay it out as clearly as possible. Much
of the confusion around this case stems from the entanglement of two groups specializing in bamboozlement: lawyers and
spies. Espionage and the law have specialized argots that hide fabrication and skulduggery. Nonetheless, critical
analysis reveals that the call was in bounds and that objections to it reduce to absurdity.
Miller: Whistleblower 'a Deep State Operative,' Has 'Contempt for the President'. On this weekend's
broadcast of "Fox News Sunday," White House advisor Stephen Miller said the "whistleblower" complaint about President Donald
Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy's dealings "drips with condemnation, condescension and contempt for the
president." Miller said, "I think it's unfortunate the media continued to describe this individual as a whistleblower
and honorific that this individual most certainly does not deserve. A partisan hit job does not make you a
whistleblower just because you go through the Whistleblower Protection Act."
CIA's hearsay move to impeach Trump is to protect Democrats. A so-called CIA "whistleblower" claims to have
information concerning President Trump's "pressuring" of Ukrainian officials to provide dirt on Vice President Biden
to — and this is rich — influence the outcome of the 2020 presidential election. [...] This sounds a
lot like the ridiculous hearsay campaign waged against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh during his chaotic Senate
confirmation hearings. In fact, Democrats running for president recently called for Kavanaugh's impeachment based on
recent secondhand sexual accusations advanced by Bill Clinton's impeachment lawyer Max Steir, as reported in The
New York Times.
Trump now has to battle CIA spies in Dems' war against him. The walls, including in the White House, have
ears. That was demonstrated in spades last week, most dramatically by the allegations from a CIA officer that Trump
used a phone call with the president of Ukraine to solicit foreign help in the 2020 campaign. That allegation and
others led to a fiery congressional hearing and spurred Democrats to quicken their pace toward impeachment. A second
instance of snooping made the "loose lips" point less sensationally but was still disturbing. Before he left the United
Nations Thursday, Trump attended a private event to thank the new American ambassador, Kelly Craft, and her staff for their
work during the General Assembly session. Some privacy. The president said, "I want to know who's the person,
who's the person who gave the whistleblower the information? Because that's close to a spy." We know he said that
and more because someone at the event, maybe more than one person, secretly recorded his remarks, both audio and video, and
promptly leaked them to the media.
presents Bill Clinton-signed treaty allowing Trump to request assistance from Ukraine on Biden. A 1999 treaty
with Ukraine, signed by Bill Clinton, provides a rock-solid basis for President Trump's request for Ukrainian President
Zelensky to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden for alleged corruption. The Bidens are
in up to their armpits with regard to a potential renewed Burisma Holdings natural gas probe[,] an overdue investigation that
was in fact initially stopped by VP Biden while he was in office[,] a fact that he subsequently bragged about.
"Whistleblower Complaint" isn't a whistleblower complaint, it's a closing argument. When the so-called
Whistleblower Complaint was released this morning, my first impression was that this was a very professionally-done document,
likely crafted by a lawyer. It looks like a lawyer letter. It's very legalistic in many parts, cites to statutes
and executive orders, and is heavily footnoted. It attempts to bring together evidence from disparate sources,
including public news reports. It is, in every sense, a closing argument or brief in support of a position by someone
who did not actually participate in the events about which he or she is writing. The document does not at all read like
we would expect a whistleblower complaint to read — alerting the appropriate authority to facts the whistleblower
has learned and leaving the legal conclusions to those authorities.
Marxists Running the Democrat Party Today Lust for Absolute Power. Tucker Carlson opened his show on Friday
night with the latest updates on the Democrat-media coup against Donald Trump. In his open he played a clip of Speaker
Nancy Pelosi now accusing Russia of being involved in the Democrats' latest made-up Trump scandal. Of course, Pelosi
and Democrats have absolutely zero evidence to push forward this theory or this impeachment scandal. And, they
certainly have no evidence that Russia is involved in anyway. But as Tucker noted, Democrats no longer deal in
facts. They deal in emotions and a blood-lust for power.
about a Bipartisan Treaty against the Criminalization of Elections? [Scroll down] I mention all this
because it is a commonplace for the government to seek assistance from foreign counterparts for ongoing federal
investigations. Indeed, as Marc Thiessen pointed out this week in an important Washington Post column, Democratic
senators pressured Ukraine to cooperate with the Mueller probe — notwithstanding the obvious potential electoral
ramifications and the specter of "foreign interference in our democracy." These requests for assistance often occur at the
head-of-state level. When I was a federal prosecutor in the mid-nineties, for example, the FBI and Justice Department
asked President Clinton to intervene with Saudi authorities to assist the investigation of Iranian complicity in the Khobar
Towers bombing. There is nothing wrong with our government's requesting the assistance of foreign governments that have
access to witnesses and evidence relevant to an ongoing Justice Department investigation. The president is the
democratically elected, constitutionally empowered chief executive: There is nothing his subordinates may properly do
that he may not do himself (it is his power that they exercise).
Andy Biggs Introduces Motion to Censure Adam Schiff. Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ) on Friday [9/27/2019] introduced a motion
to condemn and censure House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA) for performing a fabricated conversation between President
Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky during his opening statement at a panel hearing Thursday morning.
this go down as 'the mother of all traps'? Let's hope that President Trump starts tweeting and calling on
Democrats to start the impeachment process. It all starts with a floor vote, and no such thing is in the horizon.
The Democrats jumped the gun a bit here. Speaker Pelosi should have have waited for the evidence.
Community Secretly Gutted Requirement Of First-Hand Whistleblower Knowledge. Between May 2018 and August 2019,
the intelligence community secretly eliminated a requirement that whistleblowers provide direct, first-hand knowledge of
alleged wrongdoings. [...] The brand new version of the whistleblower complaint form, which was not made public until after
the transcript of Trump's July 25 phone call with the Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and the complaint addressed to
Congress were made public, eliminates the first-hand knowledge requirement and allows employees to file whistleblower complaints
even if they have zero direct knowledge of underlying evidence and only "heard about [wrongdoing] from others."
Whistleblower Requirement Was Removed, Allowing IC Complaints Based on Hearsay. A key requirement for
whistleblowers to lodge a "Disclosure of Urgent Concern" complaint was secretly eliminated at some point in the past year to
allow submissions of second-hand material, it has been revealed. This allowed the August submission of an error-ridden
whistleblower complaint against President Donald Trump to proceed, as the whistleblower — who is believed to be a
member of the intelligence committee assigned to the National Security Counsel — has admitted to having no direct
knowledge of wrongdoing on the part of the president. A previous version of the form only allowed first-hand
whistleblower complaints — not hearsay, rumor, or gossip about presidential diplomacy with a foreign leader.
Deep State Whistleblower hoax is this weeks Christine Blasey Ford. The Whistleblower hoax engulfing Washington
is yet another Deep State episode of the rolling coup d'etat Democrats are mounting against Donald Trump. Since the day
of his election. If not before. And like the Russia Hoax and Christine Blasey Ford's testimony, the ongoing smear
campaign of lies and character assassination is yet another attempt to destroy Trump's presidency by partisan operatives in
the intelligence community.
Whistleblower Form Recently Modified to Permit Complaint "Heard From Others". Folks, this "Ukraine Whistleblower"
event was a pre-planned event. As we begin to understand the general outline of how the Schiff Dossier was assembled,
we are now starting to get into the specifics. First discovered by researcher Stephen McIntyre, there is now evidence
surfacing showing the ICIG recently created an entirely new 'whistleblower complaint form' that specifically allowed for the
filing of complaints "heard from others".
impeachment crisis deepens as US envoy for Ukraine Kurt Volker resigns after whistleblower names him. An
American diplomat at the center of the U.S.-Ukraine controversy has resigned — a potentially significant blow for
President Trump as he faces impeachment proceedings in the Democratic-led House of Representatives. Kurt Volker met
with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Friday [9/27/2019] and announced he would be resigning from his post as U.S. special
envoy for Ukraine, according to Arizona State University's State Press. A former career diplomat and one-time CIA
analyst, Volker, 54, rose to prominence during the George W. Bush administration — rising to U.S. ambassador
to NATO, and joined the private sector after the election of President Barack Obama.
Want to See Obama's Transcripts. It's clear Pelosi and the Democrats just committed mass political suicide.
Radical Democrats suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome persuaded Pelosi to jump off a cliff ... and the entire Democratic
Congress followed like sheep. [...] Democrats haven't just overreached. They've walked into a big trap. No normal
person cares that Trump had a phone call with a world leader and asked him to look into massive alleged corruption by an
American politician on foreign soil. Most normal Americans are saying, "It's about time."
Asked Nadler to Open Kavanaugh Impeachment Inquiry. Sen. Kamala Harris (D., Calif.) asked Rep. Jerry
Nadler (D., N.Y.) in a Sept. 17 letter to open a formal impeachment inquiry into Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh
following the New York Times's publication of new accusations that omitted exculpatory evidence. Harris argued
the sexual misconduct allegations made against Kavanaugh in a Sept. 14 New York Times book excerpt raised the
possibility that he may have lied to the Senate during his confirmation hearing. She added that the FBI investigation
into the original claims made against Kavanaugh by Christine Blasey Ford was insufficient. Harris reiterated her
beliefs in an op-ed published in Elle magazine on Friday [9/27/2019].
Looks Like A NYT Reporter Accidentally Gutted The Democrats' Impeachment Narrative. The report from Robert
Mueller totally debunked the unverified and politically biased Steele dossier, aka Trump dossier, which was used by the FBI
to secure spy warrants on Trump officials. There was no evidence for their biggest case for impeaching this president
solely for the reason that he won the 2016 election. So, they had to wait. Alas, the Trump-Ukraine call this
summer. The president allegedly coerced the Ukrainian leadership into opening a corruption probe into Hunter Biden and
threatened to withhold military aid. Gasp! Some anonymous whistleblower who is reportedly a CIA agent came
forward with this complaint. He didn't listen in on the call but got it from second and third-hand accounts. So,
when the Trump White House released the transcript, it shouldn't shock us that all of the major allegations were
debunked. There was no quid pro quo. There couldn't have been since the Ukrainians weren't even aware that aid
was being reviewed until a month after the call.
is Male CIA Operative Formerly Part of White House NSC. Details are beginning to emerge about the deep state
political operative within the intelligence apparatus who wrote a 'whistleblower' complaint based on second-hand information
he heard on the intelligence grapevine about President Trump. According to the New York Times the complaint derives
from a male who was a former CIA operative on assignment within National Security Council (NSC), who left the White House and
returned to the CIA.
Turns Out Ukraine 'Whistleblower' Was 'Deep State Plant From The CIA'. On his radio show Thursday, Rush
Limbaugh addressed the revelations from The New York Times about the identity of the "whistleblower" who sparked the controversy
of President Trump's July 25 phone call with Ukraine's president that has given the Democrats a rationale to move forward
on their impeachment campaign. According to the Times, the whistleblower is "a CIA officer detailed to the White House,"
and, according to Paul Sperry, former D.C. bureau chief for Investor's Business Daily, rumors are "swirling" that the
whistleblower was one of former CIA Director and current NBC analyst John Brennan's "old CIA humps detailed over to —
planted inside — the White House to spy on Trump and help thwart the investigation of #Spygate which also involves
Obama DOS/FBI/CIA skullduggery in Ukraine."
The Congressman Who Cried Wolf.
When Geraldo Rivera found neither a treasure chest nor skeletal remains in Al Capone's vault, he did not dare tease an encore
special promising to surface the Titanic or interview D. B. Cooper. Adam Schiff possesses none of Rivera's humility.
After failing to substantiate loud claims of "direct," "significant," "clear," and "ample" evidence of Donald Trump colluding with
Russians to steal the presidency, Schiff follows up by accusing the president of forcing a foreign government to "manufacture dirt"
on a political opponent. [...] Why make up a story when a transcript, or at least notes that read as a transcript despite the
'artist of evil'. After watching Adam Schiff's reprehensible performance in his committee hearing Thursday
morning, it is clear we are benighted by yet another sinister, scheming member of the House who, like Shakespeare's Iago[i],
is adept at (and enjoys) ruining lives. He set out to ruin President Trump's and has been working at it diligently for
three years. Since the moment President Trump was elected, it has been Schiff, more than any other member of Congress,
who has been the public face of the attempted coup designed to get Trump out of the White House. He has lied and leaked
relentlessly for nearly three years, promising that Mueller had the goods. He did not. Each successive ploy the
Left rolled out has failed, so Schiff and company invented a new accusation, one that has obviously been carefully crafted by
a group of Iagos like those who devised the Russia-collusion hoax and managed Blasey-Ford's phony allegations.
Trump-Ukraine whistleblower complaint looks just like 'Steele Dossier 2.0'. [Scroll down] In his dossier,
Steele levied shocking accusations of corruption and impropriety by Trump and his team, going so far as to claim that Trump
was bought and paid for by Russian strongman Vladimir Putin, who allegedly had compromising information on Trump that all but
forced Trump to do the Kremlin's bidding. Steele hadn't gathered or witnessed any of this evidence first-hand.
Rather, he relied on anonymous sources, many of them third-hand. [...] Compare that to the text of the author of the
anti-Trump complaint about Ukraine. "I was not a direct witness to most of the events described," the whistleblower
wrote. Just like Steele's dossier, the complaint is riddled with third-hand rumors, gossip and hearsay gathered from
similarly anonymous officials.
demands Schiff resign over account of Ukraine call. President Trump on Friday [9/27/2019] demanded House
Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) "immediately" resign from Congress for reading what the congressman
described as a parody of the president's phone call with Ukraine's leader that is at the center of a whistleblower
complaint. In a series of tweets early Friday [9/27/2019], Trump accused Schiff of lying to Congress and "fraudulently"
reciting a version of the call that made it "sound horrible" and made the president appear "guilty."
The Editor says...
I agree, the country would be better off if Congressman Schiff resigned. The country would be better off without CNN.
The country would much better off if Nancy Pelosi resigned. The country also be a better place without any of several
dozen other lying, baby-killing socialists in the House of Representatives. But they are in Washington to stay,
for as long as they want.
CIA official on whistleblower: 'How could this be an intelligence matter?' I am troubled by the complaint and
wonder how an intelligence officer could file it over something a president said to a foreign leader. How could this be
an intelligence matter? It appears likely to me that this so-called whistleblower was pursuing a political
agenda. I am very familiar with transcripts of presidential phone calls since I edited and processed dozens of them
when I worked for the NSC. I also know a lot about intelligence whistleblowers from my time with the CIA. My
suspicions grew this morning when I saw the declassified whistleblowing complaint. It appears to be written by a law
professor and includes legal references and detailed footnotes. It also has an unusual legalistic reference on how
this complaint should be classified.
the Impeachment Frenzy May Only Strengthen Trump. Contrary to suggestions by some, most Trump supporters are
not automatons or blind supporters. What bothers them, and should bother others, about the latest Ukraine hysterias is
the familiar monotony of this latest scripted psychodrama. The whistleblower admits to hearsay ("I was not a direct
witness to most of the events described"). His term-paper report is laden with anonymously sourced rumors, e.g., "According
to multiple White House officials I spoke with," "I was told by White House officials," "Based on my understanding," "I
learned from multiple officials," "I do not know whether similar measures were taken," "I do not know whether those officials
spoke with or met with ..." Between references to Internet news accounts and "I heard from" and "I learned from"
and "I do not know" anonymous officials, there is nothing here to launch an impeachment of any president.
like the facts? Just Schiff the narrative. First we were told the phone call was, as The Washington Post
breathlessly wrote, "so troubling that it prompted an official in the US intelligence community to file a formal whistleblower
complaint." Then we actually got the transcript, and it was nothing, so we were informed by CNN that we had "to read
between the lines." In other words, as the crooked FBI agent said of the Russian collusion hoax, there is no there
there. So it was time for the Democrats to ... just plain make it up. Thus, on Thursday morning [9/26/2019],
live on most TV channels, Rep. Adam Schiff, the Framingham-born hack Congressman from California, read into the record an
utterly fabricated statement from President Trump to the president of Ukraine: [...]
The whistleblower complaint doesn't do Democrats any favors.
The whistleblower's complaint that launched the current impeachment controversy has now been released. It offers little
new information not already in the public domain. Furthermore, if it continues to be relied upon as evidence justifying
impeachment, Democrats will have to make some hard choices about how to proceed. The complaint is broken into four
parts. The first describes the July 25 phone call between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr
Zelensky. The second alleges that White House officials improperly placed records of the call in an "electronic system
that is otherwise used to store and handle classified information of an especially sensitive nature." [...] Aside from the
second allegation, there is nothing new we have learned from the complaint.
want whistleblower's sources, as inconsistencies in complaint emerge. Top Republicans on Thursday pushed to
identify the White House officials who told a whistleblower of alleged misconduct by the Trump administration, as Democrats
ramped up their impeachment inquiry — and several apparent inconsistencies emerged in the whistleblower's
complaint. Republicans specifically questioned why the whistleblower's sources in the White House didn't file a
complaint themselves — especially given that relevant whistleblower procedures do not protect second-hand
complaints. (The New York Times reported that the whistleblower is a CIA officer detailed to the White House.
Fox News has not confirmed The Times' report.)
called out for fabricating Ukraine call transcript in opening remarks. Rep. Adam Schiff acknowledged on
Thursday that he made up parts of the Ukraine phone call transcript when he delivered his opening statement at a much-watched
TV hearing with the U.S. top intelligence officer. Mr. Schiff, California Democrat and chairman of the House
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, said his reading was "part in parody" — but made the admission only
after Rep. Mike Turner, Ohio Republican, called him out.
Joe Biden went, son Hunter cashed in. In a now notorious July 25 conversation, President Trump asked Ukrainian
President Volodymyr Zelensky to "look into" Ukraine's role in efforts to interfere in the 2016 election as well as the dealings of
Joe Biden and his son Hunter with the notoriously corrupt country. Whether or not Trump's ham-fisted conversation with
Zelensky rises to an impeachable offense, the American people have legitimate reasons to be curious about both issues —
and especially the Biden family's blatant conflicts of interest abroad as Joe Biden seeks the presidency.
Ukraine scandal, Democrats refuse to wait for actual facts. Democrats needn't bother to probe an allegation
that President Trump "pressured" Ukraine's president to dig up "dirt" on Joe Biden; they already know he did. In
grilling acting intel chief Joseph Maguire Thursday, Intelligence Committee Dems repeatedly asserted — as
fact — that Trump urged Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky to "interfere" in the 2020 election by pushing him to
investigate Joe Biden, and that the White House then tried to "cover up" the president's "crime." Case closed.
"Do you agree the definition of a coverup is the attempt to prevent people from discovering a crime?" asked Rep. Eric
Swalwell (D-Calif.), as if evidence has already established illegality and efforts to hide it. Trouble is, the Dems
base their conclusions on allegations from an anonymous whistleblower recounting gossip, plus their reading of the
Devin Nunes torches vaunted 'whistleblower' report. With the Thursday morning release of a declassified version
of the famed 'whistleblower' report, the left and its media arm are having a field day. [...] After all, the report itself
serves as the latest basis for initiating impeachment against President Trump, something the left has been champing at the
bit to do ever since before President Trump took office. They've tried several times before, most notably with the
failed Russia-Russia-Russia gambit and now see this whistleblower report as their last-ditch chance.
MSM-DNC's Worst Week Ever. What a crushing feeling it must be to be a Democrat, an infotainment industry newsreader,
or a NeverTrumper today. The week started off so full of hope, with impeachment in the air as the autumn colors turned.
That was Monday [9/23/2019]. By Thursday morning it was all over but the shouting. Oh, and the lies. Lots and
lots of lies. Over the weekend, news broke that a whistleblower had the goods on Trump, who had supposedly twisted the arm
of Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky into a quid pro quo deal to investigate Joe Biden, Trump's potential
president rival. The swamp fever pitch reached such heights over the next two days, that on Tuesday afternoon House Speaker
Nancy Pelosi finally succumbed to her party's Kamikaze Wing and announced an "official" impeachment "inquiry." It seemed to
the overly eager beavers in the MSN-DNC that with one phone call, POTUS had finally put the impeachment football into play.
Biden: Trump's Ukraine Phone Call An 'Impeachable Offense'. Former Vice President Joe Biden now says that
Trump committed an "impeachable offense" in his much-ballyhooed July phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr
Zelensky. In an appearance on "Jimmy Kimmel Live!," Biden said that Trump could be impeached based on the provided
transcript of his July phone call with Zelensky. A plain reading of the transcript, however, gave no indication of a
quid pro quo wherein Ukraine would investigate the former vice president using his influence to have a prosecutor fired for
investigating his son's business dealings.
Chris Murphy Changes His Story on Zelensky Meeting. Senator Chris Murphy (D., Conn.), who traveled to Ukraine
in early September, told reporters this week that he had heard "directly" from Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky that
Zelensky felt pressured by Trump to investigate Hunter Biden's involvement with Ukrainian gas giant Burisma. But
according to a tape of a briefing Murphy gave two weeks ago about his meeting with Zelensky, Murphy made no mention at all of
such an allegation. It was only 13 days after his initial briefing that Murphy emerged to say Zelensky had expressed
concerns to him that the Trump administration was withholding U.S. aid to compel an investigation.
Schiff Dossier: Which is a Better Description of This Error-Filled "Whistleblower" Report. [Scroll
down] But never mind the fact that John Solomon has copiously documented the fact that Biden bragged about getting a
Ukrainian prosecutor fired — not for "corruption", as internal documents make clear, but — for
investigating the money-laundering machine that enriched his son and, coincidentally (*cough*) John Kerry's stepson.
Nothing to see here, folks, just move along.
Trump Triumphant as He Ridicules Adam Schiff's Impeachment 'Fantasy'. President Donald Trump ridiculed
Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) on Thursday after the House Intelligence Committee chairman employed a fantasy narrative during
a congressional hearing with the acting director of national intelligence. "Adam Schiff has zero credibility," he wrote
on Twitter. "Another fantasy to hurt the Republican Party!"
Schiff Did One of the Most Insane, Disgusting Things Ever Done In a Congressional Hearing. There is no member
of Congress more disgusting than Adam Schiff, and there are a lot of disgusting members of Congress. He spent the last
two years claiming to have super-secret proof of Trump colluding with Russia, being given a permeant spot the Sunday shows to
constantly lie about what he actually knew. When it all came crashing down, he paid no price at all, still insisting
the evidence was "in plain sight." Now, he's found a new hobby horse. Namely, this Trump-Ukraine nonsense and that
meant having a hearing today [9/26/2019] with the Intel Chief about the "whistle-blower" complaint.
opens hearing ad-libbing Trump's Ukraine call with improvised fake dialogue. Democrats are desperately trying
to nail Trump and begin the impeachment process over a conversation Trump had with Zelensky. Trump has been accused of
strongarming Zelensky with a quid quo pro in order to get dirt on Dem rival Joe Biden. Only the newly released
transcript of the phone call doesn't show Trump strongarming Ukraine at all. That pesky fact must have prompted "little
Adam Schiff" to make up his own facts when he spoke during a House Intelligence hearing Thursday morning [9/26/2019].
Sen. Ron Johnson Is Considering
Opening An Investigation Into Biden And Ukraine: Report. Republican Sen. Ron Johnson is considering
an investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden's role in Ukraine when he was still serving in the White House, The
Washington Post reported Wednesday [9/25/2019], citing unnamed sources. The Wisconsin lawmaker told colleagues that he would
consider a probe against the former vice president who is now running for president, three people familiar with the conversations
told WaPo. The report suggested other Republicans in the Senate are being more circumspect about how to approach the matter.
Levin: Today's Hearing on Trump-Ukraine Is Another Spectacle, Another Drama for the Media. In a post on
his Facebook page on Thursday at 9:53 AM, nationally syndicated radio talk show host, TV host, author and American lawyer Mark
Levin blasted today's hearing on the whistleblower complaint about President Donald J. Trump's comments to Ukrainian
President Volodymyr Zelenskyy as "just another spectacle, another drama for the media, another sham." "We will learn
nothing," wrote Mark Levin on social media. "This is just another spectacle, another drama for the media, another sham."
Intelligence Committee Releases Partisan Federal Employee's Complaint. The House Intelligence Committee on
Thursday released a redacted version of the partisan federal employee's whistleblower complaint regarding President Donald
Trump's telephone conversation with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky. In the nine-page document, the so-called
"whistleblower" claims that the president was "using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country
in the 2020 U.S. election." While characterizing the Trump-Zelensky call based on hearsay, it accuses the White House
of attempting to conceal records related to their conversation.
Media Leaving Out What Trump's 'Favor' From Ukraine President Actually Was. Major media outlets had already
decided on the narrative of the whistleblower complaint against President Donald Trump regarding his conversation with the
Ukraine president. Now that the White House's transcript has been released, these same outlets are cutting out
important context in order to give a different, more negative, impression of the call. The New York Times and The
Washington Post each put sections of the transcript on their front pages on Thursday. Each paper cut out what Trump
said after asking Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky for a "favor" and skipped ahead to a portion of the call when Trump
brought up former Vice President Joe Biden's son's involvement in a company that was investigated by Ukraine.
Strassel: "Media got this all so wrong". Wall Street Journal columnist and editorial board member Kim
Strassel posted a 10-part thread on Twitter yesterday [9/25/2019] to comment on White House transcript of the Trump/Zelensky
Scandal Is About Biden. Release of the transcript of President Trump's call with Ukraine's new president makes
one thing clear — the Democrats are focusing on the wrong guy. They're trying to use this episode to impeach
Mr. Trump. What the conversation shows, though, is that Mr. Trump was enlisting help to do exactly what he
had promised to do, drain the swamp. The culprit on whom to focus is Vice President Biden. The transcript
certainly confirms that Mr. Biden was mentioned by Mr. Trump in his call with Ukraine's new president, Volodymyr
Zelensky. And that Mr. Biden's son, Hunter, was also mentioned. This shows up on the fourth page of the
five-page transcript, after the two presidents were talking about how America gives more support to Ukraine than do the Europeans.
of Delusion: Democrats Privately Panic Following Transcript, Impeachment Fallout. The far-left flank of
the Democrat caucus forced House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) to concede and announce a formal impeachment inquiry against the
president on Tuesday. She made the announcement prior to the release of the transcript, which detailed the phone call
between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. As Republican lawmakers explicitly noted, the conversation
contained "zero" grounds for a legitimate impeachment inquiry.
demolition derby continues with Ukraine Zelensky transcript. Since taking control of the House last year,
watching the Democrats is not unlike watching a demolition derby. Pelosi, Schumer, Schiff, Green, and the Squad, to
name a few, all driving tired, beaten up, divisive narratives, as fresh as a demolition derby car. The question is what
is driving the Democrats demolition derby of hysteria over a conversation between Presidents Trump and Zelensky? A
conversation they both know is being listened to, recorded. It is simple. Ukraine knows exactly what went
transpired between the Obama administration — Obama, Biden and Clinton and the oligarchy of Ukraine. Hunter
and Joe Biden, while actions are questionable, are nothing more than a way to distract away from the very real crimes that
hurt America. The collusion of Obama and Clinton, et al., in the creation of the Russian hoax dossier.
Impeach Joe Biden.
[Scroll down] When the transcript of the call came out, however, the story fell apart. There was no discussion of
aid. Trump did not cajole or pressure Zelensky. Of course, since the impeachment train had already left the
station, Democrats couldn't suddenly shrug their shoulders and say "never mind." So the mere fact that Trump brought up
the topic of the Biden investigation is now grounds for impeachment. But if that's all there is to it, why isn't Biden
under the impeachment cloud? After all, no one disputes the fact that he pressured the Ukrainian government to fire Prosecutor
General Viktor Shokin by telling officials there, in no uncertain terms, that if they didn't, they'd lose out on $1 billion
in aid. Biden himself has bragged about it last year.
Is About the Russian Hack That Wasn't. One of the animating chapters in the Trump-Russian collusion saga was
the claim that Russia infiltrated the Democratic National Committee's email server in the spring of 2016. That hack,
according to collusion truthers, and the subsequent release of damaging emails exchanged between top Democratic Party
officials was central to Vladimir Putin's scheme to sway the presidential election in favor of Donald Trump. But the
evidence to support this widely accepted claim is sketchy at best and appears to be under appropriate scrutiny by prosecutors
now examining the origins of the FBI's pre-election investigation into the Trump campaign for "colluding" with Russia.
Hillary Clinton Colluded with Ukraine. So now we have a whistleblower who isn't because he cannot be, either
from his circumstance or from the law. He or she had no firsthand knowledge, weren't on the call or in the room, and in
any case cannot blow the whistle on a unitary executive, namely President Trump. You can only be a whistleblower for an
agency you are a member of. We have a quid without a quo and a phone conversation in which President Trump did not
pressure a Ukrainian leader into a crime Joe Biden has previously confessed to, namely threatening to withhold a loan
guarantee unless the Ukrainian government fires a prosecutor looking into a company that was paying Hunter Biden, a man with
no special knowledge of Ukraine or the business, $600,0000 a year. As Trump lawyer and former New York mayor Rudy
Guiliani points out, the phone transcript makes Trump the whistleblower and Biden the criminal in a Ukrainian collusion saga
that leads to Hillary Clinton and not Donald Trump.
another Sharpiegate. [Scroll down] Now we cannot impeach Biden [or] Obama no matter how much they and
their secretaries of state raked in actual emoluments from Ukraine, Red China, Russia and elsewhere. Hillary used a
Fake Charity. Biden and Kerry used a hedge fund run by their families. Obama likely did it through
post-presidential book deals and that Netflix contract. But we can stop the uneducated mob from destroying our
president. We do that by standing by our man just as we did 3 years ago when that Billy Bush tape
came out. We stood by Donald Trump then not knowing if he was just another carnival barker or the real deal.
Department clears Trump of wrongdoing on Ukraine call. The Justice Department's Criminal Division has already
investigated President Trump's conversation with the Ukrainian president about Joseph R. Biden and concluded Mr. Trump
did not violate campaign finance laws, officials announced Wednesday [9/25/2019]. And a separate division of the department
has also ruled that the administration did not break the law by failing to quickly share a whistleblower's complaint with
Congress, saying the matter didn't meet the definition of "urgent" that would trigger the law.
Shows No Wrongdoing by President Trump. The just-released transcript of President Trump's July 25 conversation
with Ukrainian President Zelensky confirms the president's statement that he did nothing blameworthy with regard to the Biden
investigation. The conversation was friendly and wide-ranging.
The Editor says...
I can almost hear the voice of Maxwell Smart: "Listen, I hope I wasn't out of line with that crack about impeachment."
Member of the House Judiciary Committee Blasts Dems Over More 'Baseless Accusations' Against Trump.
Rep. Doug Collins (R-Ga.), ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee, blasted Democrats Wednesday for jumping to
conclusions about President Trump's call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky before knowing the facts. "The
transcript between President Trump and Ukrainian President Zelensky reveals that Democrats have again leapt to conclusions
before looking at the facts," he said in a statement. "There was no quid pro quo and nothing to justify the clamor
House Democrats caused yesterday. The real danger here is that Democrats keep using baseless accusations in hopes of
crippling a successful presidency."
Trump's Ukraine Call Transcript Has Been Released and Blows Up the Latest Impeachment Narrative. The Department
of Justice has released an unredacted transcript of a phone call between President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President
Volodymyr Zelensky. The text was taken down by note takers. The call took place in July from the White House
Situation Room. It shows no effort by President Trump to pressure Zelensky into investigating former Vice President Joe
Biden's son, Hunter, in exchange for military aid. This action was falsely alleged by a whistleblower and pushed
Democrats on Capitol Hill into an impeachment inquiry.
of Trump's Ukrainian call reveals no quid pro quo. The Justice Department's Criminal Division has already
investigated President Trump's conversation with the Ukrainian president about Joseph R. Biden and concluded Mr. Trump
did not violate campaign finance laws, officials announced Wednesday [9/25/2019]. And a separate division of the department
has also ruled that the administration did not break the law by failing to quickly share a whistleblower's complaint with
Congress, saying the matter didn't meet the definition of "urgent" that would trigger the law.
thrives as impeachment circus ringmaster. As cable news channels breathlessly waited Tuesday [9/24/2019] for Democratic
presidential hopeful Joseph R. Biden to declare his support for impeachment, President Trump stole the spotlight. Mr. Trump
announced in a tweet that he was going to do exactly what Mr. Biden planned to demand: release the transcript of his
much-discussed phone call with the Ukrainian president.
announces formal impeachment inquiry. After meeting with her Democratic caucus, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
announced Tuesday [9/24/2019] the launch of a formal impeachment inquiry into President Trump's alleged efforts to pressure
Ukraine to investigate the business dealings of former Vice President Joe Biden's son Hunter Biden. Pelosi said "the
president must be held accountable" for a "betrayal of his oath of office, betrayal of our national security, and the
betrayal of the integrity of our elections."
Formally Announces Trump Impeachment Inquiry. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi is formally signing off on an
impeachment inquiry into President Donald J. Trump after he spoke to the Ukrainians, reportedly trying to coerce the
political leadership there to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden on corruption charges. This was dredged up
after a whistleblower came forward to the intelligence community inspector general, though it's based on anonymous
second-hand sources. The whistleblower didn't even listen in on the calls, and it's not the intelligence community's
job to snitch on the president. The president can say whatever he wants to another foreign leader. Period.
And now, before anyone has read the transcript of the call, the House Democrats are launching a full-blown impeachment
push. It's not shocking. This was going to happen eventually.
Latest Impeachment Frenzy Is About #Resistance, Not High Crimes And Misdemeanors. Despite the breathless
commentary about Trump's phone call with the Ukrainian president and a whistleblower report based on second-hand accounts of
uncertain credibility, we know little about what transpired, much less whether it rises to the level of an impeachable
offense. Democrats could have gone through the normal procedures to get the information from the White House rather
than jump immediately to talk of impeachment. But the Democrats' impeachment frenzy didn't result from this news.
It's been in full flower since before Trump was even elected.
Would Be Really Stupid, But Democrats Probably Will Do It Anyway. House Democrats' most edge towards
impeachment proceedings reveals that their fanatical hatred of President Trump, which has driven much of their agenda over
the past two and a half years, has not abated in the slightest. On Tuesday [9/24/2019], House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
(D-Calif.) announced the House will move forward with an "impeachment inquiry" into President Trump due to allegations that
he pressured the Ukrainian president to investigate corruption charges against 2020 Democratic candidate Joe Biden and his
son Hunter Biden. However, the latest calls for impeachment may end up hurting Democrats' chances of recapturing
the White House in 2020.
The Editor says...
The Democrats have no chance of winning the presidential election of 2020, without massive voter fraud, hanging chads, and
various schemes to undermine the Electoral College. Thus they have nothing to lose by putting on this chest-thumping
Morning Shows Hype Trump Impeachment 17 Times [in One Day]. On Monday [9/23/2019], the network morning shows
managed to feature some variant of the word "impeachment" a total of 17 times while reporting on President Trump's phone call
with the President of Ukraine about corruption allegations against Joe Biden's son Hunter. In addition, ABC, NBC and
CBS eagerly touted a letter from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi accusing Trump of "lawlessness."
GOP primary challenger floats 'death penalty' for president. Former Massachusetts Gov. Bill Weld, running
as a Republican challenger to incumbent President Donald Trump, suggested Monday that the president had committed treason —
and mentioned the death penalty as the "only penalty" for that crime. Appearing on MSNBC's "Morning Joe," Weld discussed Trump's
controversial phone call with the president of Ukraine, a call that may be moving House Democrats closer to impeachment.
Bill Weld suggests
Trump could face execution over Ukraine phone call. Former Massachusetts Gov. Bill Weld, who is challenging
President Trump in the Republican primaries, proclaimed Monday [9/23/2019] that the president committed treason through his
controversial phone call to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky — adding that the punishment for treason is
death. The statement drew a swift rebuke from the Trump campaign.
Joe' Refuses to Disagree with Weld's Claim Trump Should Be Killed Due to Treason. MSNBC's Morning Joe
stooped to a new low on Monday morning [9/23/2019] when the assembled panel refused to condemn 2020 Republican presidential
candidate Bill Weld's insistence that President Donald Trump should be put to death because, in his mind, he's committed
treason for his conversations with the Ukrainian president. Not only that, but Weld twice made this case while
panelists Mike Barnicle, Mika Brzezinski, Elise Jordan Joe Scarborugh, and Michael Steele refused to push back along with
fellow Trump challengers Mark Sanford and Joe Walsh. In Jordan's case, she even inquired about how this would happen.
MSNBC Discuss Trump's Coming Execution. As I wrote this past weekend, that Trump-Ukraine scandal exploded into
a million pieces after about twelve hours of hysteria. In the end, there was no threat, no quid pro quo, and no real
meat to the story. The issue for many in the media and on the left, though, is that they had invested everything into this.
They truly felt this was finally it and that Trump would be taken down for using foreign aid money to force an investigation of Joe
Biden. That didn't happen and they were again left chasing the wind, suckers of fake news once more. The problem with
being so emotionally invested in all this is that it's hard to let go. And instead of just admitting their mistake, we
end up with lunacy like this from MSNBC: [...]
Will Explode in Democratic Faces. Julián Castro, another unemployed Obama administration official pursuing
the Democratic presidential nomination, tweeted the following: "Donald Trump is a criminal. He must be impeached
immediately." Saturday [9/21/2019], Castro began a speech with another demand that the House take immediate action to
remove the president: "Let me begin with a message for our House Democratic friends — it is time for you to
do your job and impeach Donald Trump." This was a big applause line for his audience, but it contained no constitutional
justification for such action by the House.
Schiff, the Lady Macbeth of the House. [Scroll down] But at the moment, the most senseless member of
Congress is the odious and sanctimonious Adam Schiff of California. Like Lady Macbeth, he lacks humanity, and he burns
with ambition. In the span of just under three years, he has become Trump-deranged, incoherent, a man grasping at any
thread with which to bring the president down, no matter how slender the filament. This week, it is his fake
"whistleblower" scenario. [...] Since the moment Trump was elected, Schiff has been on the mythical Trump-colluded-with-Russia
train. He appeared on cable news programs hundreds of times, where he guaranteed, promised that he had proof of the
Trump campaign's illicit dealings with Russians. He did not.
Document location http://www.akdart.com/dt61.html
Updated October 1, 2020.