Just reporting the news (if there is any) won't generate ratings as effectively as
reporting news items with an emotional twist. For example, shootings, fires, train
derailments, and police standoffs always seem to be "dangerously close" to a school. With
schools only a quarter of a mile apart in the big cities, there's always one near enough to
make that connection.
I recall an occasion a couple of years ago when there was a gang-related shooting in east Dallas
just after midnight one night, right next to an elementary school, and the next morning there was
a reporter on the scene fretting about how the shooting took place "dangerously close" to the
school. But logically, that was the best possible place for a shooting in the middle of the
night — when nobody's at school!
Reporters often use meaningless one-dimensional statistics; for example, "Texas leads the nation
in big-rig accidents." (That's a quote from a recent story designed to drum up support for
some new state law.) That makes it sound like the truck drivers on Texas highways are more
dangerous than anywhere else. But Texas has more highway mileage than most other states,
and lots of really bad drivers on the road.
But there are more subtle components of media sensationalism that the average viewer hardly
notices, at least consciously. Major market stations spend millions of dollars every
year on futuristic news sets, lighting, catchy music, sound effects, visual effects,
character generators and various kinds of electronic graphics. TV newscasts are staged and
choreographed as thoroughly as a small-town play. In the old days, a middle-aged
white man sat behind a plain old desk and reported the news. That's not enough
in today's TV market. The happy news team — representing all race and
gender combinations — sits behind a Star Trek desk and reads whatever comes
up on the TelePrompter. They rarely use words that are longer than three syllables.
The high-priced news readers are really good at putting on a phony "concerned" look at just the
right time, if Botox permits. And if you'll notice, they are usually just stating the
obvious, and only rarely does anyone speak on a single subject for more than five or ten seconds.
An
Electoral Awakening Worth Celebrating. [Scroll down] Since Biden's 2020
(s)election, Big Tech has actively censored Americans who highlight evidence of electoral
fraud. The propaganda press has labeled us "election deniers." The DOJ, FBI, and too many
partisan judges have treated J6 defendants worse than alleged murderers. Protests for free
and fair elections have been preposterously described as an "insurrection" worse than Pearl Harbor,
9/11, and the Civil War. The mix of rhetorical overkill and political persecution have had a
salubrious effect: an increasing number of Americans now recognize that the federal government
conspires with social media companies to censor Americans' speech in violation of the First
Amendment and that the criminal justice system is filled with corrupt and evil actors.
Trump
Derangement is the Stupidest Political Phenomenon of My Lifetime. The dismal cabal of
hysterical adult children that makes up the alleged American cultural "mainstream," the
responsible people you see on television and in the op-ed pages — Anne Applebaum,
Tom Nichols, Ruth Ben-Ghiat, Adam Kinzinger, Liz Cheney, Joe Scarborough and his idiot wife,
Jonathan Capehart, Max Boot, Jen Rubin, David French, Bill Kristol, Ruth Marcus, Nicolle Wallace,
Dana Bash, and on and on, all of them completely interchangeable, one set of asinine talking points
with a series of different faces sewn on the front — has spent the last year or ten
descending into a urine-soaked psychotic tantrum. They don't know anything, they don't
understand anything, they don't say anything of value, they don't contribute anything, ever, and
their voices are ubiquitous. Living in this media environment is like living in a place where
the air is made of manure. They have absorbed no lesson.
The
Media Isn't Terrified That 'the End of Democracy Is Nigh' — They're Terrified of Being
Wrong. A few days ago, I wrote a story about CBS reporting that FEMA had pulled back
teams in North Carolina, partly because of an email from one park ranger claiming armed gangs of
good old boys were out "a-huntin'" FEMA Feds. Of course, there was no such thing. Gangs
of Appalachians' huntin' for Feds was about as likely as Jussie Smollett being attacked by two
MAGA-hat-wearing thugs who happened to have a noose and a bottle of bleach at 2 a.m. in the
middle of a Chicago snowstorm. No sane person believed that sort of nonsense. Well,
Kamala Harris did, which gives us a hint into her critical thinking skills. Kool-Aid-drinking
Democrat cultists believe those stories because the priests of their religion have told them it's
true. Cultists never have to think — they just need to believe. That's how
cultists roll. The congregation believes that, if elected, Trump will cause the "end of democracy."
Media
Suddenly Covers Trump Rallies Again Because of Potential Assassination Attempts.
Conservatives started asking why the mainstream media suddenly decided to broadcast Donald Trump
rallies, even though they've been avoiding doing that for a very long time. According to the
observant Americans, it is because they were informed in advance that the third assassination
attempt on Trump would happen. On Sept. 21, 2024, Trump War Room was the first to raise
the question by posting screenshots from the propaganda industry's outlets like controlled
opposition Fox News and openly leftist CNN, MSNBC and News Nation. [Tweet]
Deep
State Democrats and the Continuing Attempts to Kill President Trump. What triggers
the left-wing media? Outrage and their ego. They're outraged by sarcastic memes about
illegal migrants eating cats and geese. They're upset at those memes from "unsubstantiated"
political remarks that mock the Democrats and Vice President Kamala Harris and President Joe Biden
for overwhelming a small town in Ohio. What is "substantiated" is that Biden and Harris have
sent an unwanted 20,000 or so impoverished migrants from violent Haiti to Springfield, OH.
Yes, this an outrage! The Democrats will not be ridiculed, especially not with memes.
But a president murdered before an election? That doesn't stoke media's indignation.
"Today's apparent assassination attempt comes amid increasingly fierce rhetoric on the campaign
trail itself," said NBC's Lester Holt. "Mr. Trump, his running mate JD Vance, continue
to make baseless claims about Haitian immigrants in [Springfield] Ohio." And former Secretary
of State Hillary Clinton [...] argued the most important thing is that the news media is not doing
enough to portray Trump as a threat to democracy.
Vermont
becomes the second US state to issue stay-at-home orders because of deadly mosquito-borne
virus. Vermont just became the second state to postpone public events in order to
curb the spread of a deadly virus in the state. The Green Mountain state joins neighboring
Massachusetts in recommending their citizens stay home at night, amid high reports of Eastern
Equine Encephalitis (EEE). This rare sickness is carried by horses and spread by mosquitos,
and in about 30 percent of human cases, can cause brain swelling, vomiting, seizures and death.
The Editor says...
The article above is an example of baseless news media hysteria. The article
says, "This rare sickness is carried by horses," so go about your business and stay away from
horses! There is no justification for "stay-at-home orders." Tyranny is worse than
disease. The government is (again!) testing you to see if you will comply with their orders,
no matter how pointless they are.
PBS
and the False Narrative of "Slowly Dying" Coral Reefs. Coral reefs are some of
creation's most strikingly beautiful places. Clean and clear blue water, graceful whales and
sea turtles, swarms of dazzling fishes, and amazing coral. We can't get enough of coral
reefs, so we adorn our walls with paintings and photos. Saltwater aquariums abound in
households, restaurants and businesses around the world. Naturally, we want to protect all
this goodness and beauty. Stewardship is in our DNA. Our emotions can kick in when a
threat is perceived. Unfortunately, nefarious people know this about us. People whose
agenda has more to do with global power and control than with protecting coral reefs. [...] Take
for example the PBS News feature titled "Conservationists take drastic measures to save coral reefs
from climate change." Published earlier this year, the video begins by falsely claiming that
coral reefs around the world are "slowly dying."
Twisted
Truth: Lies, Extreme Lies, and Climate Statistics. [C]laims of the hottest
surface temperatures ever on record are made regularly for various locations across the US. But, as
noted in meteorologist Brian Sussman's new book Climate Cult, 20 states registered record
maximum temperatures of at least 109 degrees Fahrenheit, all occurring in the 1930s, a decade
that also contained the infamous Dust-Bowl years. Yet a June New York Times article on the
"not normal" summer heat conveniently displayed a graph with temperature trends beginning in the
1940s. Fortunately for much of main-stream media that pushes a climate-disaster agenda, the
public can be easily duped when temperatures are extra hot and knowledge of the climate record is
extra low. Standard statistical ploys using incomplete datasets or cherry-picked values are
circulated on not just temperature levels, but also severe weather frequency and intensity, sea
level fluctuations, and ice cap extents.
When
you have junk science, you end up with mad scientists. If journalists were curious,
instead of talking puppets pushing the Democrat agenda, they could ask a simple question like I
did, and use a search engine to find the answer: "What are the warmest summers on record?"
The following information populated: The warmest summer on record was in 1936 during the Dust
Bowl, which was before we had central air... so it was colder for more than eight decades, while
the population was rising rapidly, and while our use of the natural resources (which supposedly
causes warming) was exploding. (It should be noted that there was essentially no air
conditioning of any type in 1936.) Some of the other warm summers were 1934, 1901, 1911, and
1913. They were clearly not caused by gas-powered cars, so getting rid of them can't possibly
change the temperature.
Big
Media conducted polls to determine which climate terms induced the most hysteria. As
it turns out, all that hysterical language, tsk-tsk finger-wagging at we commoners to abandon our
modern luxuries like personal vehicles and gas stoves, and temperature map graphics with
exaggerated red shading to suggest that we're in an emergency situation didn't do anything but turn
the people off of to the whole "urgency" of the narrative. [...] Now to backtrack a little
bit: According to Williams, in April 2019, a "team of advertising consultants" published
another study that suggested the climate terms commonly used at the time ("climate change" and
"global warming") didn't do enough to whip the average media consumer into a panic —
they suggested buzzwords like "climate crisis" and "environmental collapse" as it elicited a
stronger "emotional" response. Yes, you read that correctly: They didn't want to
encourage a more rational response, or be more objective, but play to a person's emotions... and
exploit them. Without facts on your side, what else do you have?
Polar
Bears, Dead Coral and Other Climate Fictions. [Scroll down] Today,
killer heat waves are the new climate horror story. In July President Biden claimed "extreme
heat is the No. 1 weather-related killer in the United States." He is wrong by a factor of
25. While extreme heat kills nearly 6,000 Americans each year, cold kills 152,000, of which
12,000 die from extreme cold. Even including deaths from moderate heat, the toll comes to
less than 10,000. Despite rising temperatures, age-standardized extreme-heat deaths have actually
declined in the U.S. by almost 10% a decade and globally by even more, largely because the world is
growing more prosperous. That allows more people to afford air-conditioners and other
technology that protects them from the heat.
Don't
Buy the Media Lies About Crop Production. One of the mainstream media's favorite
pastimes in recent years has been trying to scare the pants off everyone by suggesting that climate
change is decimating crop production around the world. They are either lying intentionally,
or mistaken. However, in either case, there is some journalistic malpractice going on, as
well as a notable failure of logic. We have all seen the stories, the favorites of the media
usually have to do with foods that are popular semi-luxury items, depending on where you live, like
cocoa beans, coffee, and wine. For instance, Forbes put out an article claiming that cocoa, olive
oil, rice, and soybeans are all "particularly vulnerable" to the effects of "climate-induced stressors."
How
the media coordinated the failed assassination of Donald Trump. Two months ago, I
predicted that the media were laying the groundwork for justifying the assassination of Donald
Trump after the New Republic published an entire issue depicting the former president as Adolf
Hitler. I wish I could claim some supernatural gift of foresight, but it was not the first
time I had made this prediction, and I was not alone, as several other pundits, including Tucker
Carlson, had also seen the writing on the wall. The attempted assassination of the leading
presidential candidate on Saturday was shocking, but in many ways it felt inevitable. The
American media have been steadily intensifying their anti-Trump rhetoric for years, whipping their
audience into a murderous frenzy. The disgusting freaks who constitute the regime press are
not concerned or outraged at the attempt to murder Trump; they are simply disappointed that the
instrument of their vengeance was a bad shot.
The
Press and Pundits Make Wild Claims in the Wake of the Court's Immunity Decision. On
MSNBC, Rachel Maddow warned that the Supreme Court had just unleashed death squads to roam our
streets. CNN legal analyst Norm Eisen announced that murder was now legal (at least for
presidents), while others predicted that the ruling on presidential immunity would invite
"tyranny." Anyone reading the coverage would conclude that James Madison has been replaced by
John Wick in a new "Baba Yaga" Republic. President Biden fueled the sense of panic in an
address that repeated widespread false claims about the decision in Trump v. United
States. Biden told the country that "for all practical purposes, today's decision almost
certainly means that there are virtually no limits on what a president can do." That, of
course, is not true. I have long opposed sweeping presidential privileges and powers. I
have long argued that a sitting president can be criminally charged in office. But the
portrayal of this Supreme Court opinion by the left and the media is wildly off base.
World's
sleep being chipped away by hotter nights, global warming, Climate Central study says.
Climate change is not only harming the planet[,] it's also ruining our sleep. A new report from
Climate Central says rising nighttime temperatures are chipping away at human sleep across the globe.
Scientists found global mean temperatures have risen by more 34 degrees Fahrenheit since 1850,
setting a new record in 2023.
Reaction and rebuttal: World's
Sleep Being Disrupted By Global Boiling. It's amazing what a 1.7F increase (or 2.2F,
depending on which climahysteric outlet you listen to) over 170+ years can do, eh? All while
the Warmists are trying to take air conditioning away from Other People, and stop those people in
places like Africa from getting it[.] [...] ["]Scientists found global mean temperatures
have risen by more 34 degrees Fahrenheit since 1850, setting a new record in 2023.["]
[...] According to NASA the mean global temperature is 59F. Are we seriously supposed to
believe that it was 25F in 1850?
How
the Met Office and BBC Try to Fool Us All. As we all shiver in the autumnal weather
during what is meant to be summer and some of us have even turned our central heating back on or
continued using our winter duvets, there is one certainty — in a few weeks time, the
good folk at Met Office and the BBC will tell us that we've just had the "warmest June on record".
After all, the Met Office and the BBC made the same claim about appalling April and miserable
May. In fact, the weather has been so wet that there is a risk of a potato shortage later
this year. So, what will be intriguing will be the mathematical contortions the Met Office
and BBC will use to justify their preposterous nonsense.
The Editor says...
The article above was published on June 20, so it was a bit premature to say, "we've just had the 'warmest June on record.'"
BBC
Pushes U.S. Heatwave Story But Buries 'Junuary' Winter Storm Story. The BBC has a
story today about the heatwave in May and early June the southwestern U.S. and Mexico.
Apparently, a report by the World Weather Attribution (WWA) group has claimed that climate change
made the heatwave 35 times more likely, though exactly what that means goes unexplained. [...]
The interesting thing about that BBC story is the complete lack of any mention of the spectacular
plunge in temperatures across the northwestern United States as a major winter storm crossed over
the Rockies into Montana and Idaho.
Groups
urge FEMA to treat extreme heat as a major disaster. As the first significant heat
wave of the season sweeps across the country, several organizations are urging the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to classify extreme heat as a major disaster. Tens of
millions of Americans face dangerously hot temperatures this week in a heat wave moving from
Midwest states like Ohio to cities in the Northeast. "It's going to feel like the upper 90s,
may even feel like 100 a couple of the afternoons," said Randi Rico, a WLWT meteorologist.
The Editor says...
[#1] Sometimes the weather in June is quite warm. That is not a crisis or a disaster or an
emergency. There is no need to beg for money from FEMA. The government can't control the weather.
[#2] It "may even feel like 100 a couple of the afternoons," the WLWT weather lady. So what?
Other parts of the country are way ahead of you, in that regard. Deal with it.
Climate
Propaganda Cabals Ramp Up the Heat for Summer. [Scroll down] They will be
pumping this junk out all summer — telling us that summers are hot. We already
know that. If you can tell the difference between a 90°F day and a 91°F day without a
thermometer, or without a "climate journalist" to tell you that that "one more degree" is caused by
driving your classic '55 Chevy to the summer car show, you are a better person than I.
They are collaborating, they are conspiring — both in the open and behind closed
doors — and they are will say anything they think the public will swallow.
The
Mirror goes mega-viral for saying UK will be "blasted" by 78°F "heatwave".
[Scroll down past several advertisements and tweets] It's headed to 93°F today in
Michigan, where I have the inexhaustible pleasure of writing this article. We have
moose that reside in our state. They don't seem to mind the occasional hot day.
[Advertisement] Meanwhile, Brits apparently melt if the mercury rises above room-temperature.
Top
Study Confirms UN's 'Climate Crisis' Claims Are a Hoax. A top study has confirmed
that fearmongering claims made by the United Nations (UN) to support the "climate crisis" narrative
are a hoax, directly contradicted by data. Despite claims from the UN and other unelected
globalists, the study has found that alleged "climate disasters" are not increasing. In fact,
eminent Italian researchers Gianluca Alimonti and Luigi Mariani found that the environment has been
significantly improving in recent years, with climate-related events decreasing. However, the
researchers found that, while "climate disasters" have been decreasing, fearmongering studies and
corporate media reports linking "global warming" to weather events have increased dramatically,
creating the illusion of a "crisis." The study observed trends in climate disaster reports
between 1900 and 2022.
Stop
Making Plane Turbulence About Climate Change. Passengers "smashed" into the ceiling,
blood stained the carpet in the aisles, luggage flew through the cabin, and there was "awful
screaming": Is what happened on a Singapore Airlines jet on Monday evening going to become a
regular occurrence? The plane, which was flying from London to Singapore, reportedly
encountered "severe turbulence" about 10 hours into the flight, while 37,000 feet above
southern Myanmar. Multiple passengers were injured — 20 were still in intensive
care this morning — and one man died: a 73-year-old British citizen who appears to
have gone into cardiac arrest. Within hours of reporting the incident, major news organizations
were wondering: Will this be the new normal, in the age of global warming? "Is climate
change making turbulence worse?" asked the BBC.
Now
We Are Supposed to Cheer Government Surveillance? They are wearing us down with
shocking headlines and opinions. They come daily these days, with increasingly implausible
claims that leave your jaw on the floor. The rest of the text is perfunctory. The
headline is the takeaway, and the part designed to demoralize, deconstruct, and disorient. A
few weeks ago, the New York Times told us that "As It Turns Out, the Deep State Is Pretty
Awesome." These are the same people who claim that Trump is trying to get rid of democracy.
The Deep State is the opposite of democracy, unelected and unaccountable in every way, impervious
to elections and the will of the people. Now we have the NYT celebrating this.
And the latest bears notice too: "Government Surveillance Keeps Us Safe." The authors are
classic Deep Staters associated with Hillary Clinton and George W. Bush. They assure us that
having an Orwellian state is good for us. You can trust them, promise. The rest of the content
of the article doesn't matter much. The message is in the headline.
No,
Sun Sentinel, Florida Isn't Under Future "Climate Threats". A recent article in the
South Florida Sun Sentinel (SFSS) newspaper, titled "Florida in 50 years: Study says
land conservation can buffer destructive force of climate change," makes some catastrophic claims
about what Florida's climate will be like in 50 years. The article relies heavily on
climate model projections, that are undermined by real world evidence and by the fact that the
climate models in question have been shown to create "implausibly hot forecasts of future warming."
As outlined in Climate at A Glance: Climate Model Fallibility peer reviewed science has
shown that climate forecasts like the one cited by the SFSS have no basis in reality because
comparisons of actual measured atmospheric temperature data to model forecasts show up to a 200%
discrepancy between model temperature outputs and observed temperatures. Because the
temperature forecasts are wildly implausible, the claimed disastrous impacts that are forecast to
result from those unbelievably high temperatures also lack credibility.
BBC
weather map row heats up over confusing colours. The BBC has been criticised for the
colour scale it uses to represent temperatures, with lows of 11C shown as yellow while 41C is
depicted as dark red. The broadcaster has triggered confusion among some viewers with its
temperature contour map, which switches to orange when temperatures hit 13C. The colour scheme
was introduced in 2017, with the BBC at the time saying it was intended to help those with colour
blindness. Toby Young, the founder of website The Daily Sceptic, suggested that the BBC was
"going a bit far". "How is it going to represent temperatures above 20C? Fireballs?" he
said. A weather forecast on Tuesday night showed most of the country yellow and orange for
Wednesday when temperatures were predicted to hit as high as 20C. One viewer wrote on social
media that the system was "utterly farcical". "I'm not a massive conspiracy theorist but I
have to agree with those who castigate the utterly ludicrous use of bright yellow and orange/red on
the weather maps to indicate temperatures of 18/19 degrees!" the viewer wrote.
The Editor says...
When television was received on black-and-white receivers, 50 years ago, no consideration was given
to "color blind" viewers. We were all color blind. At the same time, much less
emphasis was placed on sensational (and highly speculative) forecasting beyond the next 24 hours,
hardly any TV stations had their own weather radar, nobody had any delusions about the government
being able to alter the weather, and absolutely nobody considered carbon dioxide to be a threat.
The
Price of Surrendering Speech. Our mainstream media has been surrendering its freedom
for years, not by any dictate from the top but by a seismic shift in its values and self-perceived
role in society. The process started slowly, long ago, when publishers and editors discovered
a gold mine in obsessing over celebrity heroes, then accelerated when they found that a celebrity
villain offered the same rewards. They learned to favor sensation over substance, never
worried that their chosen villains are not always evil, nor their heroes always virtuous. For
them an off-color remark or over-the-top boast from one of their celebrities becomes more important
than any substantive dialogue about policy. [...] The celebrity fixation justified, even required,
hyperbole, since their stars need to be larger than life, meaning the media accords them vastly
more authority, and credibility, than they deserve. Eventually for the legacy media
everything — from the climate cycle to devolution of rights to states, passage of school
choice laws and scores of invented microaggressions — became existential threats.
George Bernard Shaw once complained that the media can't distinguish between "the end of the world
and a bicycle accident." Shaw was engaged in hyperbole when he spoke those words but they are no
longer exaggeration.
Why
are states and counties declaring emergencies for the solar eclipse? [Scroll down
past numerous tweets] A lot of it is tied back to the creation of the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) in 1979 by President Carter. The federal government doesn't have
jurisdiction at the local level (in principle, at least), so local jurisdictions declaring
emergencies is basically the first step of a formal invite for state and federal manpower to come
in and help fix a particular problem. Since we have super-short term memories, let me remind
you that this happened for the 2017 eclipse too. [...] If there's a conspiracy here, it's the
observation that using a process meant for true emergencies as a "Get out of Jail Free Card" for
every inconvenience is really [read: REALLY] bad for a free society that doesn't want rule by
martial law.
The Editor says...
Solar eclipses happen every few years, but there has almost never been so much
hype about an eclipse before. The eclipse of August 21, 2017, was apparenly good for the
news media, because they are really talking up this one, and that is what's causing
"emergency" declarations all along the eclipse's path.
How is this not "hate speech?" 'The
View' Co-Hosts Launch Into Lengthy Man-Hating Tirade. "The View" co-hosts jumped into
a lengthy man-hating tirade Friday, calling straight ones "useless." The co-hosts responded to
a TikTok trend asking women if they need men, agreeing with the majority who answered "no." They
adamantly assured they are not including gay men in their criticism. "Because men are
useless," co-host Ana Navarro said. "I mean — and by the way, I wanted to
differentiate between straight men and gay men because I think I would die without gay men.
No one can gossip like a gay man, no one can help you accessorize like gay men, and nobody can help
you from doing harm to yourself like gay men." She said her husband would be "emaciated, starving
and living in his own filth" without her.
Synthetic
Controversy. In media, including legacy/mainstream, social and other alternative
media, controversy sells. And it often seems like all media has become much more about sales
than about sharing factual information. Controversy generates clicks, re-posting, and message
amplification. The controversy can focus on either a substantial or a trivial issue. In
modern PsyWar, with its emphasis on censorship, propaganda, and psychological shaping or
manipulation, facts and reality are increasingly irrelevant. It is no longer necessary for
the controversy to be fact-based. We all know about the power of "fake news" to capture the
attention of the general public, and in many ways it is far easier to drive views and clicks with
unsupported statements and speculation than by doing the research necessary to comprehend a
topic. Facts can be difficult and inconvenient things, but when reality becomes defined by
feelings and opinions rather than objective facts, then development and exploitation of false
narratives becomes child's play.
Activist
Media Outlets Run Cover for Fulton County DA Fani Willis, Claim Scrutiny Is Motivated by
Racism. It was only a matter of time before folks on the left began throwing race
into the saga surrounding embattled Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis. Activist
media outlets have begun spinning the narrative that the criticism and scrutiny of the prosecutor
isn't about her inappropriate romantic relationship with one of the prosecutors she hired to handle
the election interference case against former President Donald Trump but about the color of her
skin and her sex. The New York Times and Associated Press have published pieces
intimating that the furor over Willis' alleged corruption was due to racism and sexism and not the
fact that she clearly engaged in a torrid affair with prosecutor Nathan Wade. The only thing
surprising about this is that it took them so long to begin weaving this narrative.
2023
Was Not the "Hottest Year on Record" for Over 70% of the World's Population, Data Show.
Further doubt has been cast on the widely-broadcast alarmist temperature claim that last year was the
hottest since records began. A deep dive into figures published by the U.S. National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) reveals that the 'hottest ever' claims did not apply to large areas
of the world including Asia, Europe, North America, Oceania, East N. Pacific, Hawaiian region,
Arctic and Antarctic. Investigative science writer Larry Hamlin notes in the science blog
Watts Up With That that at least 58% of the Earth's
land surface where 73% of the world's population lives did not experience the hyped 'highest ever
recorded' average temperature anomaly.
Separating
fact from fiction on 'climate change'. Here are some legitimate scientific
facts: I was in Denver on December 23rd, 2023, and the national weather report was
talking about how warm the country was; the temperature was 55°F, which was 12° above
normal. Then, the meteorologists showed that the record high in Denver for that date was
74° in 1901. Then on December 24th and 25th, the high was around 30°, which was
13° below normal. Here are the only truthful statements that can come from those
facts. Temperatures fluctuate, and Denver's temperature has been colder "than normal" on
December 23rd for the last 122 straight years.
Hottest
In 125,000 Years? Just about all of the media have been peddling the "Hottest
for 125,000 years" claim, which suggests a very concerted effort by the climate establishment
in the run up to COP28. The claim is self evident and baseless nonsense for a number of good reasons:
• There is no such thing as "a global average temperature"
• Even now we have very sparse coverage of temperature measurements. Prior
to satellites, we had virtually no data outside of the US, Europe and a few other built up areas
• The temperature record we do have is thoroughly corrupted by UHI, and only
dates back to the late 19th C[entury]
• Natural variations, including ENSO, volcanic activity etc, can easily cause
temperature swings of a degree Celsius from year to year, and decade to decade. But historical
proxies don't have the fine resolution to pick these up, they merely give an idea of average temperatures
over decades and even centuries. Consequently you cannot compare one year now with the general
climate of, say, 2000 years ago.
But forget about all of these theoretical objections, because the climatic evidence we do
have is overwhelming, and it tells us that the climate has been much warmer than now for most of
the last 10000 years, since the end of the ice age.
Not
the Babylon Bee. What exactly a "climate disease" is is a mystery until you realize
this term was invented to make a snappy headline. In non-headline speak, these are diseases
that are spread by more frequent interactions between people and wild animals driven out of their
natural environment due to climate change. Or they are diseases we are to believe are made
more common due to climate change. Color me skeptical. Malaria, Dengue fever, and other
diseases have been with us for millennia, and new diseases have been springing up throughout human history.
The
Truth about the Jeffrey Epstein John Does. There is a certain level of difficulty in
reporting on the Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell saga, much of it having to do with what the
authorities haven't revealed: the web of Epstein's network (much of it still secret), the ties to
intelligence (of which documentary evidence is still hidden from public view), the internal
deliberations that went on at Main Justice in Washington, D.C. when Epstein got his sweetheart plea
deal (again, not yet publicized). Add to that the false media reports and blatantly
inaccurate social media posts that spring up every time there's any small development in any
Epstein or Maxwell case. Like today, for example. The Daily Mail led the way, reporting
that a federal judge "has ruled to unseal documents that would name 177 Does who are Epstein's
friends, recruiters and victims within the coming weeks." This was followed by a flurry of social
media takes — especially on Twitter — promising there will be serious revelations
from these records or claims that "177 Jeffrey Epstein high profile associates will be revealed in
the new year." There's a problem with that sensationalism: it's inaccurate.
More
media drumbeating on the global warming nonsense from USA Today. We are told that the
science is settled, that the last 160 years of our using natural resources have led to record
high temperatures on Earth and that the ocean is rising to unsustainable levels. [A recent]
article from USA Today says the Earth used to be much hotter, so why do they tell us constantly
that the Earth has reached record high temperatures and that we don't have much time to save the
planet[?] [...] Of course, they never explain how the Earth cooled from 1940 [to] 1975 when they
say all these things cause warming. Facts haven't mattered to green pushers for a long
time. And of course, the solution is big government and taking away our freedom of choice of
what we drive and how we power our houses and appliances. We are supposed to capitulate to
radical green pushers which makes us poorer and them much richer.
The Editor says...
How could the ocean be "rising to unsustainable levels?" What's easier to sustain than sea level?
Globalists
Fear the Unconquerable. State-controlled news media blare continuous warnings that
citizens should fear racism, "white supremacy," misogyny, imperialism, colonialism, paternalism,
Christianity, Israel, hydrocarbon energy, heterosexuality, capitalism, exercise, Karens, Chads,
Western civilization, personal liberty, country music, Southern states, suburban moms, political
speech, scientific debate, masculinity, democratic elections that don't elect Democrats, Donald
Trump, limited government, nuclear families, gun-toting Americans, psychologically healthy adults,
Christmas decorations, assimilation, accurate history, cultural appropriation, national borders,
due process for conservatives, misinformation, malinformation, disinformation, and stable
marriages. On the flip-side, the atheistic priests of the "woke" church insist that
opposition to either gay pseudo-marriage or the new fad of "transgenderism" represents some kind of
irrational "phobia" that must be overcome immediately. In other words, the new world order
demands that Westerners fear almost everything except bearded men crushing women half their size in
competitive sports. Talk about lunacy!
USA
Today article seeks to gin up class hate. There's apparently no end to how far the
mainstream operatives will go in their quest to destroy the virtues of the West, and a USA Today
article published last week is a prime example. The man behind the piece, Daniel de Visé,
essentially implies that anyone not born into tremendous wealth doesn't have a chance at success,
and those who are rich only got that way by mere circumstance and birthright, overtly implying that
capitalism has caused this problem and that, we must work harder for equality. There are huge
problems with de Visé's article, but I will do my best to tackle a few of them to
explain how the premise is entirely wrong.
Climate
Change Is Not Threatening Human Health. The mainstream media has increasingly used
words like "catastrophe" and "uninhabitable" to describe the condition of the planet. This is
despite the fact that data show weather is not getting worse. Creating climate anxiety is
explicitly the goal of media climate reporting. Bombarding their audiences with scare
stories, facts to the contrary be damned, is aimed at motivating people into "taking action" and
supporting severe restrictions on fossil-fuel use. Survivors of a natural disaster may also
struggle with PTSD or similar ailments, but it doesn't mean that climate change is the cause.
VOA reporting that climate anxiety is a result of climate change itself is frankly disgusting.
In the end, objective scientific data does not show that human health is being negatively impacted
by climate change, and it is certainly not the biggest health threat facing humanity.
This
Summer Was Not Even in America's Top 10 Hottest, Say Scientists. The mainstream media
continue to fall hook, line and sinker for the tempting alarmist bait set by urban heat
corruptions. The Guardian said a record was set this year in the U.S. city of Phoenix
during a "hellishly hot summer" with the most hot days over 110°F. The BBC's report on
Phoenix took the opportunity to add that heatwaves are becoming more frequent and intense, "because
of human-induced climate change". It is often hellishly hot in the desert state of Arizona, and
in fact last summer was the warmest in Phoenix going back to 1933. But strip out the heat
created in the ever-expanding concrete and tarmacked metropolis, and it turns out the area was only
the 11th warmest on record. If the record hot summer in Phoenix was due to global warming, as
claimed in almost all media, then it would show up at weather stations surrounding the
city — "right?" asks Dr. Roy Spencer at the University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH).
ABC
News: Thanksgiving Dinner 'Could Soon Become Another Victim' of Climate Change.
Thanksgiving "could soon become another victim of climate change," a recent report by ABC News
warned. The report said rising temperatures "threaten the abundance and quality" of
ingredients that make up a traditional Thanksgiving dinner. "As a result, these essential food
items could become increasingly scarce and more expensive, potentially forcing families to omit or
make substitutions in key recipes on their Thanksgiving menus," the report said.
Joe
Biden supporters had an especially paranoid couple of days. It's amazing that this
man was once a congressman, because he clearly has zero understanding of both political
philosophies and the American political system — for the umpteenth time, fascism is a
leftist ideology and America was never supposed to be a democracy — and on a
recently-broadcast televised MSNBC segment, Joe Scarborough issued an ominous warning: if President
Trump secures a second term, he will "imprison" and "execute" any and all political opponents that
he can. Projection much? Who's really been imprisoning and executing political
opponents? Does the name Ashli Babbitt ring a bell? What about Craig Robertson?
Owen Shroyer? Or how about the J6ers? Or, is this a signal of guilt? Has he done
something criminal and he's starting to sweat? Talk about paranoia! But it wasn't just
Scarborough because Scary Larry, a prominent Twitter Democrat, announced that another Trump
presidency meant an official Brownshirt squad, and Trump already had his gang ready to go: [Tweet]
Another
Long, Hot Summer. [Scroll down] Every year, it's "the sky is falling,"
until it's not. Then, with egg on their faces, the forecasters crawl back into their studios
and begin whining about another potential catastrophe, almost as if they're wishing one would
happen. I am genuinely happy that Idalia did so little damage and that casualties were so
low. I'm not sure the mainstream liberal networks were happy about it. [...] There was no
flooding in my community despite our proximity to [Hurricane] Idalia's cone. I sat
comfortably in my house, reading and working, hardly aware that a hurricane was passing by.
We did not lose power, no trees were down, and there was no wind damage. The reporters were
getting wet, the signage around them was bending a bit, and their voices were full of manufactured
urgency. But there was no urgency where I sat.
The
Weather Channel's Absurd 'Hot' Propaganda. The Weather Channel is absolutely
ridiculous. The channel's "Weather Across the Country" map on their homepage for September 19
had red colors EVERYWHERE! Because it's HOT HOT HOT! No area of the country is experiencing normal
weather for mid September, apparently. Chicago, for instance, was displayed as red to deep orange.
Warm, right? I can tell you from personal experience: It was "freezing" on Tuesday, September 19
in Northern Illinois for a day that is still technically summer. It rained all day and barely got over 60
all afternoon. I regretted not wearing a jacket to the office. On this map, Seattle is in
"yellow/green" denoting cooler weather, but I can assure you that today in Chicago felt like Seattle ...
and it probably felt a lot warmer in Seattle where The Weather Channel said, and showed with color,
that it was significantly "cooler." [...] Minot, North Dakota was allegedly 86 degrees today and is
in "cool" yellow. Jacksonville, Florida is one degree higher at 87 and is in "deep red hot."
Ignoring
History Means Choosing Windmills Over Whales. What we do know is that the media will
hysterically opine about climate change records. Except that they'll be wrong (as always).
There's nothing exceptional about the current heat we're experiencing:
• Death Valley, California, holds the world-record temperature high:
A whopping 134 F measured on July 10, 1913.
• North Dakota hit its historic high of 121 F in 1936.
• Montana experienced its highest temperature of 117F in 1937.
• Despite being the USA's warmest state, Florida's record high is only
108 F, and that occurred in 1931.
Control
Versus Choice. COVID cases are up. Hospitalizations climbed 24% last
week. But the media make everything seem scarier than it is. The headline "Up 24%!"
comes after dramatic lows. Hospitalizations are still less than half what they were when
President Joe Biden said, "The pandemic is over." [...] This month, several school districts in
Kentucky and Texas closed. "The safety and wellbeing of our students, staff, and community is a top
priority," said the school superintendent in Texas. But kids rarely get very sick from COVID,
and schools aren't COVID hotspots. Studies on tens of thousands of people found "no
consistent relationship between in-person K-12 schooling and the spread of the coronavirus."
A Lancet study found Florida had the 12th-fewest excess COVID deaths in the country, even though
Florida students went back to school without masks relatively soon.
Independent
Journalists, the Frontline Workers in the War on Truth. Truthful and comprehensive
journalism is at the heart of whether we will continue to devolve, or whether we regain our
national footing. By their nature, journalists have a platform with the public, and a
tremendous ability to influence it; people believing in and then acting on erroneous information
yields destructive consequences. In this way, journalists as a whole advertently support the
interests of the Democrat Destroyers; think of the "every man for himself" hysteria stories or the
suppression of the efficacy of certain medicinal drugs when COVID first appeared.
In
California This Weekend, We Saw, Again, How Easy It Is to Panic Americans. I am
writing this column on a beautiful sunny day in Southern California. It is a Monday in
mid-August, so it is not a national holiday, yet in Los Angeles County, where I live, all the
schools and all government offices are closed. Why? Because, for the past week, the
National Weather Service, state and local authorities, and national and local media have been
ceaselessly warning that a tropical storm would hit Southern California on Sunday night and Monday
with a "life-threatening" intensity not seen since the last tropical storm hit California in 1939,
84 years ago. [...] Unlike the invisible COVID-19 virus, the reason for panic this time was
completely visible. All these people needed to do was walk outside of their home or
hotel — or just look out the window. Had they done so, they would have seen that
steady but moderate rain was falling. Just rain. No high winds, no downpour, no storm,
not even thunder or lightning.
'Global
Warming' Morphs Into 'Global Boiling' as the Global Climate Hoax Turns Up the Heat.
On July 27, 2023, the United Nations turned up the heat on the global climate hoax by declaring
"the era of global warming" has now morphed into "the era of global boiling." With typically
hysterical rhetoric, UN Secretary-General António Guterres said that, "short of a mini-Ice
Age" in the coming days, July 2023 would likely "shatter records across the board." [...] This
all-too-obvious coordinated drumroll of frightening climate change warnings has become the
propaganda technique of choice for international organizations who presume responsibility for
controlling Earth's climate. The only problem with the current theme of the
month — namely, that July 2023 was the "hottest" month on record — is that it
is NOT true. But truthfulness is apparently a less worthy goal to the UN, the WMO, and the
European Commission than making sure we stop using hydrocarbon fuels, the energy that has allowed
modern industrial states to prosper during our good fortune to be experiencing an interglacial
warming period. The whole point of these announcements is to scare people. "Climate
change is here," the UN chief said. "It is terrifying. And it's just beginning."
The Editor says...
It's only terrifying if you watch TV, and believe everything you're told. If you turn off the TV,
it's just a hot summer. Winter will be here soon enough.
Warming-obsessed
media wrong again. There is not much new about media hyperbole in weather reporting,
but July's climate alarmism may be more breathless than usual. Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn
and other social media were inundated with posts containing flaming red maps of Southern Europe and
Northern Africa. [Several tweets] "July 2023 will probably be the world's hottest month in
hundreds, if not thousands, of years," said top NASA climatologist Gavin Schmidt. One Twitter
user (with 22,000 followers) claimed, "After the hottest day and week, we are now experiencing the
hottest month ever (in about 120,000 years, based on paleoclimatology). As we keep warming the
planet, we will soon experience global temperatures not seen in the past million years!" When
questioned about the justification for his claims, the tweeter responded that scientists had "discovered
there was a glacial period, which many people know about from a movie called Ice Age."
Imagine substantiating scientific claims by referencing a Hollywood movie! Such is the
sorry state of critical thought.
The
press is trying to scare us about heat deaths to promote its global warming agenda.
We are supposed to be scared because 13 people, mostly older, died from heat in the current hot
weather, and we are told that heat deaths are becoming more common. [...] Good journalists who care
about informing the public, instead of indoctrinating them to push an agenda, would do some
research to put the heat related deaths in perspective. Sadly, the current crop of
journalists seems much more interested in getting the public to capitulate to the radical green
agenda to remake or destroy America, instead of informing them. According to the CDC, the
most recent data show an average of 702 people die from heat related illness each year. To
put that number in perspective, around 3 million people die each year from all causes, so less than
three-hundredths of one percent of deaths each year are caused by heat. How many of the 702
would have died from other causes that year? My guess is, just like with COVID, they had
other significant health problems?
'115
Degrees Fahrenheit' screams the New York Times headline. But in point of fact,
instead of seeking to scare people with high temperatures, most of the reporting lately talks about
the heat index. The purpose is to make people think it is warmer than it is. [...] If you
Google the question: What is the highest heat index ever recorded, you actually get the highest
actual temperature ever recorded which was 134 F. which occurred in Death Valley California in
1913. A lot of other heat records occurred during the 1930's, so why do they keep
telling the public that these are the hottest years on record and then claim that humans, cars,
CO2, Coal, methane etc. have caused the high temperatures?
All
Of A Sudden, Outbreaks Of Malaria, H5N1, Swine Flu And Monkeypox Are All In The News.
After a bit of a lull, it appears that pestilences are going to start making headline news once
again. Of course that is the last thing that many of us want to hear. Many Americans
are finally getting their lives back to normal after the last pandemic, and a lot of people are
hoping that we won't have to go through another for a long time to come. Unfortunately, the
truth is that we have entered a period of history when major outbreaks will be quite common.
In secret labs all over the planet, mad scientists are monkeying around with some of the deadliest
bugs ever known to humanity, and as we have seen, it is way too easy for an "accident" to
happen. One of the diseases that our scientists have been playing around with is Malaria, and
now there are four confirmed cases in Florida and one in Texas.
Human
groundwater usage causing earth to wobble? According to the pajama boys over at
thehill.com, a new study has found that humans have pumped so much groundwater out of the earth
that the planet has begun to detectably wobble on its axis. They admit the "magnitude of the
new wobble is slight — a matter of millimeters, which puts it in the same approximate
speed category as Earth's slowly drifting continents." So, perhaps the wobble is actually
related to the Earth's slowly drifting continents? The Hill says the findings, recently
published in Geophysical Research Letters, purport to "show the extent to which human
action — in the form of dam construction, groundwater drilling, and the
burning of fossil fuels — are impacting the very position of the Earth."
[...] The "scientists" conducting the study allegedly found that, between 1993 and 2010,
human society, largely due to agriculture, had depleted 2,510 gigatons of groundwater, the
equivalent of half the volume of Lake Huron. Half the volume of one lake? Is that
really that calamitous?
The Editor says...
The migration of the poles did not begin in 1993, and there is no reason to believe that human activity caused it. More comments below.
Earth's
tilt has changed by 31 inches thanks to humans — and it could make climate change even
WORSE, study warns. Our insatiable need for water may be keeping us alive, but it's
shifting the tilt of the Earth, a new study shows. Researchers in Korea say the removal of
groundwater around the world for drinking and irrigation is altering the Earth's mass and in turn
making its axis 'wobble'. According to the team, we've shifted such a large mass of water that
the Earth tilted 31 inches (78.5 cm) east between 1993 and 2010 alone.
The Editor says... Socialists think you're really stupid.
Does anyone believe that anything we do could make the earth wobble?
Does anyone at the Daily Mail understand how big the Earth is, and how little 31 inches is by comparison?
Is anyone harmed by the migration of the poles? Apparently the article above is
sounding an alarm about a 31 inch peak-to-peak excursion over a period of 17 years.
What happened before 1993? Is there any historical data showing that the poles did not migrate before the
industrial revolution? Even if everything in the article above is true, and it isn't, what would it take to stop
the wobble a planet that has a mass of 5.9722 x 1024 kg?
The only reason to write an alarming newspaper article about a non-problem (that can't be fixed even if it is a problem)
is deception: If the writers can convince you that driving your car is destabilizing the whole world, they
might talk you into giving up the freedom that your car represents, along with other freedoms. I suspect the
Earth has been wobbling since about 4,000 years ago, a couple of weeks after Noah got aboard the ark.
Note: ["]The International Latitude Service was created by the International Geodetic Association
in 1899 to study variations in
latitude caused by polar motion, precession, or 'wobble' of the Earth's axis.["] How many cars were
on the road in 1899? How many electric power plants were on line back then?
NBC's
Chuck Todd Discovers That Black Teenagers Are Shooting Each Other. Delivering
statistics on gun deaths among teenagers, NBC News Chuck Todd discovers that black teenagers are
killing each other at a much higher rate than white and asian kids. Todd is shocked, shocked,
at the outcome. [Video clip]
The
media's role in mass shootings. The past few years have seen long stretches of calm,
despite the propaganda from the biased and suspect "Gun Violence Archive," which seeks to label
almost every petty crime incident as a "mass shooting" in the mind of the public. On
occasion, the peace is interrupted, with mass shootings taking place at predictable intervals after
each miscreant from the previous shooting is elevated in the media to anti-hero status. This
is the well known and well studied phenomenon of media contagion, with each subsequent attack being
predictable as clockwork. So why aren't the nation's socialist media taking responsibility
for its actions in causing these tragedies? Why does it appear that they would rather exploit
other people's pain for their political gain than save lives?
What's
the Real Reason Political Anxiety Is So High? [#1] Governmental power and
control. The only reason we have anxiety, stress, and worry about what happens in government
is because the government is ridiculously, uncomfortably powerful. If our political enemies
(whoever they happen to be) take power, they could exert tremendous control over our lives.
So on some level, a bit of anxiety is reasonable. [#2] It doesn't help that we're in the era of
the 24-hour news cycle. Media companies come in all shapes and sizes, from corporate
juggernauts to independent journalists, and everyone is racing to publish news stories for the
public to consume on a constant basis. There is no more reading the morning paper; we are
constantly bombarded with information. Even if some of this information is positive, it's
easy to become overwhelmed and feel anxious as a result. [#3] Bad media incentives.
It's ironic that the very news organizations publishing stories about high rates of political
anxiety are the same ones (perhaps) intentionally stoking those anxieties. Media companies
aren't necessarily incentivized to tell the truth or commit to quality journalism; instead, they're
incentivized to get clicks and attention.
Perpetual pessimism: Huge
Rain Finally Comes to Drought-Stricken California, Media Predictably Moans. It should be good news: large
rainstorms have been dumping huge amounts of rain and snow on the drought-plagued Golden State, and much more is
expected. After draconian water restrictions were placed on many residents last summer — with many
forced to watch their lawns disintegrate into a crispy death — one would think all this water would be
welcome. But if you read a lot of the media out there, you'd think storms were a bad thing; we should get
rain and snow — just on our terms, not the weather's.
Don't
Let Police, Media Mislead You About Fentanyl Exposure Overdoses. Once again, media outlets are rushing to
sow panic by blindly accepting a police department's claims that an officer may have accidentally overdosed by being in
close physical proximity to fentanyl, reinforcing the false message that you can potentially overdose on the drug even
if you don't intentionally consume it. This time we head to Tavares, Florida, where the Tavares Police Department
distributed to the local press body camera footage of Officer Courtney Bannick appearing to collapse and pass out after
encountering what turned out to be fentanyl and meth in a rolled-up dollar bill she found in a routine traffic
stop. Local news outlets lapped it up (the story, not the fentanyl) and the video footage ran on WESH (the local
NBC affiliate), FOX 35, and elsewhere. In none of the initial stories does anybody so much as question
whether what they're seeing is actually being caused by exposure to fentanyl.
"Some
of the Worst" News Media. About 15 years ago I co-authored a book about air pollution and the Clean Air
Act. I know — you'll just have to contain your excitement. One of the things we found was an
example of what might be called the reverse Lake Wobegone Effect, i.e., according to local media every local area had
"some of the worst" air pollution in the whole country! Every metro area was below average! Of course, if every
place has "some of the worst" of anything, then no place really does (as the government's air quality data bear out*).
[...] Actual EPA data shreds these claims, but environmental advocacy groups (especially the American Lung Association's
annual "state of the air" report) produce cookie-cutter press releases claiming that each local area suffers "some of
the worst" pollution in America, and the media dutifully repeats these claims. This is why most environmental
"reporters" are really just stenographers for environmentalists. This ought to be embarrassing for any serious
editor or publisher, but there aren't many serious editors or publishers any more.
11
Years Ago, Democrats Got Everything Wrong. They Are Doing It Again. On January 8, 2011, shortly
after 10:00 AM, Democrat Representative Gabby Giffords and 18 other people were shot. Six died. Within
minutes, every form of media was set ablaze with speculation. [...] By early afternoon, Jared Loughner a white male, had
been identified as the shooter. Loughner was instantly linked to neo-Nazis and white supremacists. He was
linked to the Tea Party and then to the "right wing" generally. [...] By mid-afternoon, a graphic with crosshairs
"targeting" Democrat districts was shown on CNN, MSNBC, Huffington Post DailyKos, and dozens of other shows and internet
sites about every 30 seconds. The map, they loudly claimed, was definitive proof that Sarah Palin's PAC map had
incited Loughner. Palin was to blame. The right was to blame. All Republicans were to blame. By
nightfall, the torches were lit and the pitchforks were out. [...] Almost nothing media initially reported was
accurate. Palin had nothing to do with Loughner's personal grudge against Giffords. Within weeks, America
knew conclusively that Loughner never saw Palin's target map, and that "target maps" have been used for decades.
Hurricane
Hysteria, Hype, and Histrionics. Hurricane season is upon Southeastern America and that means hair-on-fire
hysteria from the media and the political left. After Hurricane Ian ravaged southwest coastal Florida, we have
heard nothing but hype from the corporate media, eager to connect every hurricane to catastrophic global warming,
climate change, or whatever excuse they are currently using to usher in the Green New Deal and tyrannical top-down
control of all aspects of our lives. Hurricanes are not new and are a staple of southern coastal regions since
long [ago]. Yet judging from media histrionics, severe hurricanes are only a recent phenomenon, ignoring hundreds
or thousands of years ago when Florida was nothing but a swamp. Hurricane harpies in the media, practicing one of
the Democrats' favorite strategies of never letting a crisis go to waste, were quick to pounce on tragedy for political
gain. Look at some of the headlines, all singing in perfect harmony. [...]
While
Reporters Crowded Around Biden's Airport, 12 Suspected Terrorists Were Caught At The Actual Border. Think
America's legacy media can't get any worse at their job? Think again. Following reports that Gov. Ron
DeSantis, R-Fla., would be sending a plane full of illegal immigrants to a local airport in Georgetown, Delaware, near
the residence of President Joe Biden, reporters and self-proclaimed journalists flocked to the location of the supposed
drop-off on Tuesday, waiting with bated breath for an event they could spin to fit their anti-GOP agenda. The only
problem for the press, however, was that the plane in question wasn't carrying migrants and didn't even land in
Delaware. As reported by left-wing NBC News, "by late Tuesday, no plane had arrived [in Delaware]" and instead
"landed in Teterboro, New Jersey," with no migrants "aboard the plane." "Earlier in the day, DeSantis stoked the
coals of speculation by declining to confirm or deny whether the plane would even take off — his
administration later refused to say if the plane that landed in New Jersey was part of his program to relocate
migrants — in an intentional effort to keep the issue alive," the NBC report claimed, citing an unnamed,
anonymous source as evidence of its assertions.
MSNBC
Praises 'War Hero' Biden Who Was 'Chopping Wood' in the Mountains 'Til His Country Called. Do you envision
Joe Biden as a war hero? Do you see him shirtless and sweaty, axing oak for the fire he's busting at the biceps to
build? From the sound of things on MSNBC, it wouldn't be wrong. Last week on Deadline: White House, host
Nicolle Wallace welcomed network contributor and Morgan State University journalism Professor Dr. Jason
Johnson. Discussion turned to the Charlottesville conflict of August 2017, during which a man drove his car into a
crowd. Horrifically, he killed one person and injured several others. [...] Did Joe Biden — who
previously held no interest in ascending to the land's highest office — see the shock of Charlottesville as a
sign he had to suit up and save America? It seems Dr. Jason believes so.
Is
Extreme Weather Causing the World's Rivers to Dry Up? A recent CNN article entitled
"The World's Rivers are Drying Up from Extreme Weather. See How 6 Look from Space" purports
to argue that rivers such as the Colorado, Yangtze, Rhine, Po, Loire, and Danube are dwindling due
to "a painful lack of rain and relentless heat waves." [...] Let's start close to home. The
Colorado River is cited as the first example, and, although CNN attributes its drying to the
"historic drought in the US West," they do not suggest that this drought is human induced.
They do mention, however, that "around 40 million people in seven states and Mexico rely on the
river's water for drinking, agriculture and electricity." But an evaluation of the current
conditions from the USGS National Water Dashboard indicates, as shown below, that many stream gauge
stations in western Colorado and Utah are near normal, and in New Mexico and Arizona, they are
above and much above normal.
The
vast majority of pharmacology, psychiatry, vaccine science and published research is a complete fraud. [Scroll
down] As a hilarious example of the junk science lunacy of the climate cult, look no further than the corporate-controlled
media which now claims that every country in the world is heating up faster than every other country in the world. Such a
claim is mathematically impossible, yet it has become the default lunatic claim of the climate cult media, regardless of its
incomprehensible nature.
CNN'S
'Climate Correspondent' Predicts All Life on Earth Is About to End. Nearly all media cooperate in disseminating
climate change fear-porn. When hot months come because the northern hemisphere is closer to the sun, temperatures go
up. Changes in temperatures are reported in media with alarm and always denoted on graphics in blood red. A few
days ago, I saw this graphic of July temperatures in Europe. The split screen shows different colors, although the
temperatures are just about the same. The replies were swift to point out that other stations reported hot weather
temperatures as a red graphic in 2017. In any event, the effect of coloring land in red is to cause people to feel the
emotional burn. Feel the fear. [Tweet]
NBC
Panics Over Climate Change, Blames Manchin for Blocking Biden. On Monday's NBC Nightly News, after
spending the first five minutes of the broadcast panicking over a heat wave in the middle of July, anchor Lester Holt and
correspondent Anne Thompson chalked the warm weather up to "climate change" and sought to blame Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV)
for blocking the Biden administration's radical climate change agenda which would drive inflation up further by pumping more
money into the economy. "This severe weather certainly underscoring the increasing role of climate change and the
challenges America faces in trying to combat it," Holt whined before turning to Thompson to give her report.
Weather forecasts now use
a deep, dark red to represent glorious sunshine. Why? People are starting to notice some, uh,
less-than-subtle psychological conditioning rearing its head in modern weather forecasting. What was once the smiley,
happy face of the sun letting us know we could strip off and run through the neighborhood sprinklers [...] has been replaced with the deepest, darkest red that corporate media graphics departments can
create, designed to summon forth notions of hell on Earth. Observe, back in 1995 — when "John Kettley was
the weatherman, [...] — a temperature of 30 degrees celsius
was reflected with a gentle orange. That's 86 degrees to you Americans. Or "sweater weather" if you're in
Arizona. It wasn't a deep orange. It wasn't an offensive orange. It wasn't even as orange as a former
President freshly emerging from his tanning bed. No, by July 2022, the same temperatures (30 degrees), at the
same time of year, are reflected with the most sinister red you could imagine.
Can
a Crisis Happen If No One Pays Attention? It's hard to pay attention to fake crises when there's a real
economic crises. Politics as entertainment is most appealing to those who are basically comfortable and aren't worried
about basic bread and butter issues. That's now a smaller demographic than it used to be. There's also a shortage
of actual crises. People are worried about crime, the actual everyday kind that they might experience, as opposed to
the abstract "we need gun control because of occasional mass shootings" agitprop. The number of actual people whose
lives have changed or will change because of the Dobbs decision is tiny. On the other hand, people are canceling summer
plans, moving and scrimping because of crime and the economy. The pandemic actually affected a lot of people, the
current wave of political crises does not.
L.A.
Times' 8 'Bombshells' from Hutchinson Testimony Are All Duds. The establishment media treated the testimony
Tuesday of former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson at the January 6 Committee as if it were damning for Trump —
before her claims began to fall apart. The fact that Hutchinson was seen actually hugging members of the January 6
Committee, as if they were partners in some joint enterprise rather than investigators seeking the truth, ought to have
raised red flags — but did not, until it was too late. The Los Angeles Times, among others —
including Fox News — set aside the basic rules of journalism, accepting as fact the sudden claims made by a witness
whose testimony was based entirely on hearsay and who was never subject to cross-examination. The Times published
a list of what it called eight "bombshells" — some of which were soon debunked, some of which remain dubious, and
some of which were just a repetition of things that were already common knowledge or that other witnesses had already told
the investigation.
Just
5% call abortion [their] top concern. Abortion, the No. 1 concern in today's media and politics, ranks nearly
dead last among areas voters care about as they struggle with paying daily bills, soaring inflation, and interest rate hikes,
according to a just-released survey. While the Supreme Court's decision overruling the 1973 Roe v Wade
right to abortion has dominated today's network and cable coverage, the latest McLaughlin & Associates poll said just 5% of voters
call it a top concern. Just below abortion, at 1%, is reviewing the 2020 election, over which the media are also obsessing.
The
Hysterical Media Reactions Flow Immediately After Overturning of Roe v. Wade. As Redstate reported, in one
of the biggest and most impactful stories of the last 50 years, Roe v Wade has been overturned by the US
Supreme Court. The leaked draft decision that pushed conversation and outrage for the last several months was real, and
it has now been made official. States now have the right to regulate the brutal practice of abortion as they see fit, a
move toward respect for human life and basic morality we haven't seen in this country since slavery was abolished. It's
hard to overstate how big of a day this is for those who have fought so diligently to protect the lives of unborn
babies. No, this doesn't provide a federal ban on abortion, but it does ensure that the federal government can no
longer dictate to Americans and their state representatives that they must legalize and support such barbarism.
January
6 committee has hired a former ABC News executive to produce Thursday's 8pm hearing as if it is a blockbuster documentary,
report claims. A former news executive has been recruited by the House select committee investigating the
January 6 attack on the US Capitol to produce the Democrat-led panel's upcoming primetime hearing, a Monday [6/6/2022] report
claims. James Goldston is a former president of ABC News. Before that he ran the mammoth-sized operations at Good
Morning America and Nightline as executive producer. And he's now an adviser to the group of lawmakers who are set to
present their case that Donald Trump's efforts to undermine democracy culminated in the deadly events of January 6, according
to Axios.
Journalist
Tries to Crash Uvalde Victim's Funeral, Bikers Have a Different Idea. The funerals for those killed in the
tragic school shooting that occurred in Uvalde, TX, have started to take place. That comes amidst the relentless
politicization of the event by the left and the media — despite the fact that in such a moment, there's typically
nothing a family wants more than privacy. Yet, a "health reporter" from The Houston Chronicle (again, trying to
politicize what happened), attempted to crash one memorial in order to take pictures. Fortunately, a group of bikers,
who were there providing security, had other ideas.
The
media's role in creating mass shooters gets less attention than it deserves. Politico published an
interview last Friday with two criminologists who have studied mass shootings. Jillian Peterson is a professor of
criminology at Hamline University and James Densley is a professor of criminal justice at Metro State University.
Together, they've created a database of mass shootings since 1966 along with a detailed life history of 180 shooters.
Their research points to a number of commonalities among them. Right away, they highlighted the role of the media and
social contagion in these events, suggesting a connection between the Buffalo shooting and the one in Uvalde.
Mass Shootings:
The Media Misinformation Campaign. If there is any maxim religiously observed by the corporate news media, it
is this: "If it bleeds, it leads." Moreover, if the blood in question gushes from gunshot wounds inflicted by a
deranged mass murderer, the major news outlets uniformly portray the crime as evidence of an ever-increasing wave of violence
caused not by criminals but by their weapons. This narrative is a textbook example of misinformation whereby news
organizations studiously ignore data and definitions on mass shootings developed by Congress, the Federal Bureau of
Investigation, and other law enforcement sources.
Was
Canada's orgy of self-recrimination over...nothing? Last year, Canada began an orgy of self-recrimination when
researchers claimed to have found a mass grave at a residential school in British Columbia with the remains of more than 200
indigenous children. The problem is that the ground-penetrating radar used to make this "find" yielded highly suspect
results and not a single grave has been confirmed through an archaeological dig. Now, a group of dissident scholars is
calling foul on this entire narrative.
Time
Mag is Wrong, Climate Change Will Not Make Food Scarce. A Time Magazine article ascribes the potential for a
major food crisis to two sources: the war in Ukraine and climate change. Concerning the latter claim, Time is simply
wrong. While the war in Ukraine and sanctions on Russian exports have had an impact on food prices, there is no
evidence climate warming has or will harm food production worldwide. The Time piece, titled "The Food Crisis Can't
Handle Ukraine War and Climate Change," says the current high grocery prices are merely a sample of an even worse crisis to come.
Pulitzer
Prize-Winning Health Journalist Revealed the Real Purpose of Masks in 2018: Fear. Pulitzer Prize and Peabody
Award winning journalist Laurie Garrett gave a refreshingly honest and clear-eyed assessment of the usefulness of masks in
fighting coronavirus pandemics. Unfortunately, her assessment, given as the Keynote Address at the National Academy of
Medicine in December 2018, was given prior to the Covid-19 outbreak. Garrett, a Council of Foreign Relations member,
spilled the beans in a presentation called "From the 1918 Influenza Pandemic to 2009 H1N1 Pandemic to Now: Is the World
Ready to Respond to the Next Outbreak?" After her presentation, which periodically cast doubt on the historical utility
of general public masking around the world, she fielded a question from a member of the audience on such measures. This
was her candid response. [Video clip]
CNN
Claims Pro-Life Supporters Will Turn Violent with SCOTUS Victory, Amish Extremists now Threatening ANTIFA Peacekeepers. This
example is just another example of how the Ministry of Truth operates. Political violence is speech, unless actual speech is heard from
their opposition; then, it becomes violence. War is peace. Water is dry, etc. George Orwell sighs. Knowing there is
an increased likelihood of violence incited by far-left democrat activists and the White House, CNN moves their advance narrative engineering
team into place to lay the blame for violence at the feet of their political opposition. With Roe v Wade potentially being
overturned, Amish extremists are now going to lay siege to the peaceful assembly of ANTIFA in DC, or something equally stupid. [Video clip]
Was
the Alito Opinion Leak a Distraction? This Conservative Radio Host Thinks So. According to Wayne Allan
Root, a conservative radio host who is also a brilliant writer, it was the result of something more sinister: it's meant to
be a distraction from the bombshell that Dinesh D'Souza dropped in "2000 Mules," his documentary about the voter fraud that
he contends took place in 2020. [...] While a good point, Root isn't the only one claiming that this is a coverup, with
others saying that the leak was actually an attempt to cover up the recently released Pfizer vaccine data, another sacred cow
for the mainstream media, social media censors, and leftist Fauci-enthusiasts.
NBC
Host Suggests Republicans Are Nazis. Elon Musk slammed NBC News on Monday [5/2/2022] in response to a rant from
a far-Left MSNBC host who claimed that Musk bought Twitter and turned it over to "the far-right." MSNBC's Mehdi Hasan,
who has compared non-Muslims to "cattle," tried to downplay America's far-Left by claiming that they only want to "give us
free health care and free childcare" while claiming that the far-right "wants to give us white supremacy and no democracy."
CNN
Analyst Melts Down Over Musk's Purchase of Twitter. The same leftists who claimed social media isn't censoring
conservatives are melting down over Elon Musk's decision to buy Twitter. Elon Musk purchased Twitter for $44 billion
dollars last week and the left is not taking it well. Musk has stated that he believes 'free speech' on social media
should match the law of the country. "I am against censorship that goes far beyond the law," Musk said. The Biden
Regime is so frightened over Musk's decision to buy Twitter that they responded by creating an Orwellian, unconstitutional
"Ministry of Truth." Twitter censored the Hunter Biden laptop story shortly before the 2020 election so Joe Biden is
working overtime to make sure he has full control over the internet.
The
Media's Latest Attempt at Creating Another COVID Panic Is Beyond Pathetic. Unlike liberal America, everyone has
learned to live with COVID. It's endemic. It's going to be here forever. Haven't had COVID, you're
lucky. You might get it; you have the rest of your life to catch 'rona. Others who've had it should be prepared
to get it again. It is what it is, folks. It's the latest edition to cold and flu season; COVID will just be the
third person at the party. It's seasonal. Get over it. Take your stupid mask off. We have
therapeutics and vaccines. The era of lockdowns is over. Philadelphia idiotically reinstated their indoor mask
mandate. NO ONE followed suit which shows you where everyone is now. The upcoming 2022 elections have also played
a part. [...] And these clowns wonder why everyone is sick of this circus. It's damaged kids psychologically beyond
repair. The mental health crisis for adolescents is going to be a nationwide epidemic, but at least they wore masks,
right? Liberals' abuse of children in schools over COVID shouldn't shock anyone.
It
was Watergate until it wasn't. During the Trump presidency, I observed the following rule about breaking news,
especially negative ones about President Trump. I would hear the news and wait a day or two. Why? Because
there was a good chance that the news would turn out to be fake news. The latest example was the famous "phone time
gap." Where was President Trump during those hours? Was he hiding in the basement planning the attack on the
Capitol? The media went crazy, from another round of experts to outrageous speculation. Some even brought up
the tired line about this being "worse than Watergate." How did it turn out?
Oops!
Another 'walls closing in' narrative about Trump hiding phone records with a 7-hour 'gap' falls apart. A couple
days ago, the press was wildly celebrating the demise of Donald Trump over Jan. 6 matters. They breathlesslyclaimed
there was a seven-hour stretch of congressionally subpoenaed phone records that was missing from the White House transcripts
on Jan. 6. It had to have been removed. There had to be a coverup! It's the coverup that'll getcha. The
walls were once again closing in on Trump. Gotcha. [...] Worse than Watergate, they hollered. Except that ...
oops, they actually found all of the tapes. There was no gap.
What
the Forever Crises Are Really About. Thomas Hobbes wrote that people are willing to surrender their liberties
to government out of fear. Fear is what compels us to flee to the foot "of the mortal god" that is the state for the
promises of protection and security. Free us from the danger of harm is the impetus of the slow growth of authoritarian
government that becomes totalitarian government over the course of time: government's totalizing control over all aspects of
our lives. And what has the century of perpetual crisis revealed? Precisely this. If we consent to the
government solution in all these crises, we will be free from the danger and harm that threatens our lives. So we are
inundated by the media and the rhetoric of our politicians with the constant threats which rely on a sense of fear to
surrender our liberties. If we do not, then they employ the fear of social and moral shaming: how dare you not
have compassion for your neighbor or grandma!
Another
'Walls Are Closing on Trump' Story Has Collapsed. How many of these stories do we have to endure from the
liberal media before they understand that Donald Trump is not going to be indicted on anything. The "walls are
closing in" stories are too many, but each one has the same ending: Trump wins.
Former
News Executive Reveals the Government 'Warning' Given to Networks to Air Covid Propaganda. The Covid pandemic
response beginning in 2020 was one of the most sweeping cases of media propaganda in world history. Governments not
only lied to the masses ("15 days to slow the spread," e.g.) and made dubious claims based on poor evidence ("mask up"
to end the pandemic), but it censored even civilians for doubting the mainstream narrative. Now, a former news executive at
international network Sky News, as well as a veteran of ITV, has come forward to reveal what news audiences have only
previously been able to surmise: Some news networks must have been ordered to adhere to the government's pandemic
narratives or risk serious consequences (such as losing broadcasting licenses and other reprisals). Mark Sharman
revealed his disturbing insights into the astoundingly coordinated media coverage of the Covid pandemic in a sit-down
interview on British channel GBN's "The Lockdown Inquiry" with host Dan Wootton.
Anyone
Else Starting to Get a Bad Feeling About All This Ukraine Worship? Two things can be true at the same
time: Ukraine is being mauled by vicious invaders, and globalists are laying the foundation to leverage this crisis
that they've been building up for months. The alacrity with which the establishment has thrown its full weight behind
the plucky Ukrainian rebels is setting off all my alarm bells. [...] I know a stampede when I see one. We're still in
the death throes of the last one, COVID-19. Before that, it was Black Lives Matter. There was also the dreaded Jan.
6 "Insurrection" and Russian Collusion in there somewhere. The ruined lives, fraud, wealth transfers, and costly
infrastructure from those pushes are still stacked up all around us, but Big Global has such an effective machine in
operation at this point that they can keep hitting us with ginned-up crises before we have a chance to clean up the mess from
the last ones.
The
Truth About Biden's Fake War With Russia. Biden tried to be FDR and failed at that. Now he's settling for
playing a senile elderly JFK. If you watch 5 minutes of CNN or any cable news network, you might believe that we're on
the verge of war with Russia. That's what the same people who claimed that President Trump was working for Putin want
you to believe. Their new war with Russia is as real as Russiagate. Democrats want to fight Russia to the last
Republican. They aren't about to fight a real war. Their fake wars with Russia are an attack on
Republicans. Russiagate came after Democrats spent eight years giving Putin everything he wanted as Hillary toted a
Reset Button from a swimming pool and Psaki posed in a sickle and hammer hat. And that was just what we knew about.
The
Unbearable Racism of COVID. The media like to say that "COVID has struck minorities harder than other
races" or, as the Washington Post has it, COVID "ravages" minorities rather than other races. This is a loaded and
utterly dishonest statement, and one with racist undertones to boot. First of all, COVID is not an agent that decides
to "ravage" one race rather than another. Actually, COVID does not "ravage" anyone. One contracts COVID, as one
would any other disease, and one does so in a number of ways and situations. Second, there's that word "minorities."
By this the media do not mean minorities in the sense of those who constitute a minority of the population, as do all races,
depending upon how and where they are counted. What they mean are blacks and Hispanics, but primarily blacks. And
among blacks, they do not mean IBM executives or sports billionaires — they mean poor blacks. The
media goes out of its way to find individuals of partially African descent who are unsuccessful, and it then claims they are
the victims of "systemic racism." In truth, they are no more "victims" than is any one of us. Every person alive
has faced challenges. Some have faced them and surmounted them; others have not.
"The
View" Panel Accuses Clarence Thomas of Being a Race Traitor, Says 'He Doesn't Represent the Black Community.
What is Clarence Thomas? An amazingly thoughtful and intelligent Supreme Court justice? A hero of sorts that
overcame the disadvantages of his upbringing, the prejudices of his time, and the damage done to his career by affirmative
action and ended up at the very top of the legal system? Well, yes, those are both correct answers. But the
jabbering parrots on "the View" didn't arrive at that answer. No, according to those bitter, cackling hens, Clarence
Thomas is a "race traitor." Yes, they really said that. Oh, and they implied that Amy Coney Barrett is a traitor
to women. Those comments, indicative of the hate-filled nonsense that suffused the entire segment, are both truly
reprehensive and are quickly becoming mainstream thought on the left, which is firmly committed to the radical ideology of
CRT and remains stuck on other grievance studies.
Danish
Newspaper Apologizes For Publishing Official COVID Narratives Without Questioning Them. In August, Germany's
top newspaper, Bild, apologized for the outlet's fear-driven Covid coverage — with special message to children, who were told
"that they were going to murder their grandma." Now, a newspaper in Denmark has publicly apologized for reporting
government narratives surrounding the Covid-19 pandemic without questioning them. "We failed," reads the article's headline
from tabloid Ekstra Bladet, which goes on to admit that "For almost two years, we — the press and the population — have
been almost hypnotically preoccupied with the authorities' daily coronavirus figures."
Dr.
Nicole Saphier throws cold water on media's 'flurona' fear mongering: 'It's no surprise'. Fox News medical
contributor Dr. Nicole Saphier appeared on the network's "Fox and Friends" Thursday to shed light on what some are
calling "Flurona," a medical condition so named for those who have been diagnosed as having COVID-19 and the flu
simultaneously. Host Ainsley Earhardt laid out examples of the condition, noting that the CDC has reported only 79
cases of the double infection so far in the entire nation. Dr. Saphier said, "I love the way that the media loves
to sensationalize something, and I guess this will be our new headline for the next month." She explained that the
"Flurona" is not a new mutagenic or variant of the COVID virus, rather it's simply part of getting sick.
German
Paper Apologizes for Scaring Kids With Panic-Driven Coverage of Covid. In a shocking example of media honesty,
the editor-in-chief of Germany's top newspaper, Bild, has apologized for the news outlet's panic-driven coverage of the China
flu. He specifically singled out children who were told "that they were going to murder their grandma."
Editor-in-chief Julian Reichelt videotaped his apology and told the children of Germany he was sorry for Bild's coverage,
which was "like poison" and "made you feel like you were a mortal danger to society." [...] You won't see this in most news
reports, but the Delta variant of COVID is less dangerous than the variant that China released in 2019. It has caused far
fewer deaths and hospitalizations.
Brilliant
Video Shows How Media, Joe Biden and Govt Health Officials Drove the Omicron Fear Narrative. The Omicron doom
and fear narrative became a parody of itself. One brilliant videographer has put together a mashup showing what took
place in the past ten days. It all started with ultra-progressive Harris County, Texas, Judge Lina Hidalgo holding a
dramatic press conference to report that an unvaccinated man in Houston, who was in his 50s, had died from the omicron
variant. However, only one journalist actually called the hospital to check the claim and discovered what progressive
Judge Lina Hildago claimed was actually false. There was no unvaccinated 50-year-old man who died from Omicron in the
hospital. It was all made up by the judicial version of AOC. Unfortunately, once the media, medical establishment
and politicians had that press conference soundbite, from a judge — not a doctor, they were off to the
races. This video brilliantly shows what happened next. [Video clip]
Inside
the Omicron fear factory. The official response to the Omicron variant provides a case study in the deliberate
manufacture of fear. [...] We hear constantly that 1,300 people are dying a day from Covid. By comparison, about 2,000
people die each day from cancer, and 1,600 from heart disease. Their deaths get no coverage. Covid was the
leading cause of death in the US only in January 2021, even among those eighty-five and older. Since then, it has
ranked as the third most frequent cause of death both in the overall population and in the elderly. To read the press
coverage, however, you would think that nothing approaches Covid in fierce lethality and that all public resources should be
directed to stopping its spread, no matter the costs to the education and socialization of children, to physical and
psychological health, and to economic opportunity.
The
Corporate Media Freakout Over The Omicron Variant Isn't Normal, It's Psychotic. Omicron is here, and with it
comes death and destruction — unless, that is, you cancel Christmas, hide in your homes, get all the boosters,
double mask, and demand to see negative Covid tests and proof of vaccination for anyone who darkens your doorstep. Any
precautions, no matter how seemingly outlandish, are seen as justifiable to protect yourself from this new and terrifying
variant. So it is, anyway, with a disturbingly large number of reporters and commentators in the corporate press, whose
coverage and individual responses to Covid have become increasingly divorced from that of the rest of America. To watch
CNN or read The New York Times, you'd think omicron was the most deadly strain of the virus to date, poised to overwhelm
hospitals and leave a trail of death behind it. The reality, which most Americans have readily grasped, is just the
opposite: Omicron appears to be the least dangerous strain of the virus yet. After five weeks of omicron's spread
in South Africa, where the variant first appeared, the news is encouraging: mild to nonexistent symptoms, hospitalization
rates nine times lower than previous surges, and extremely low rates of severe illness and death even though only about a
quarter of the population is vaccinated. Here in the United States, only one person has died from the omicron variant
thus far, even though omicron cases accounted for nearly three-quarters of new infections nationwide last week.
Professional
sports again prove the folly of vaccines and 'COVID protocols'. Some of the healthiest people on the planet are
being managed by some of the dumbest people on earth. According to Vice, the NFL is now a "COVID superspreader."
With the playoffs beginning in almost exactly one month, there are — as of this writing (the list has been growing
daily) — nearly 100 (out of approximately 1700) players on the NFL's COVID-19 list. Tellingly, Vice notes
that "Sixty-five players have tested positive in the last two days, including a single-day record on Monday of 37 new cases."
So again we have an "outbreak" among those who've merely "tested positive" for the Wuhan Virus. The Vice article goes on
to mention how the NBA and the NHL are dealing with "outbreaks" of positive Wuhan Virus tests. Without one mention of a player
who's actually sick, seven times the Vice piece uses the phrase "tested positive" or a close derivative. Several more times
Wuhan Virus "test" or "testing" is mentioned. No mention of hospitalizations, no mention of deaths, just "tests." What's
more, over 94% of NFL players are "vaccinated" (that definition keeps changing).
Actor
Denzel Washington Infuriates the Leftist Media Because he Tells the Truth About Race in America. Hollywood has
avoided discussing racial issues with several black Hollywood actors for a long time, when they slip up and ask someone like
Denzel Washington their race-baiting questions they quickly get destroyed. Listen as time and time again the legend
himself, Denzel, doesn't fall for the race-baiting and instead flips it back to people being individuals, not a collective as
the commies and socialists in the USA are hoping for. [Video clip]
PBS:
Kids Are Justified in Feeling Panic Over Climate Change. On Wednesday's show PBS NewsHour, anchor Judy
Woodruff relayed results from a poll commissioned by PBS NewsHour and Generation Lab, finding that substantial
percentages of children believe climate change will effect important life issues for them later on like having children or
where they live. The show then devoted eight minutes to the issue by showing a pre-recorded piece by correspondent
William Brangham. One high school student featured in the piece, Sofia Palau, recalled suffering from panic attacks,
and having difficulty studying for the ACT because she kept thinking of the "impending doom."
The Editor says...
The main reason kids have any concern about the climate is that they've been soaking in alarmist propaganda dispensed by the public schools
and outlets like PBS. Today's world-wide average temperature is indistinguishable from 75 years ago. There is no impending
doom. There is no crisis. There is no emergency. There is no reason to be afraid of carbon dioxide. Many other
things should be of greater concern than next year's weather. Wasting taxpayer money
on PBS, for example.
Chicago Tribune
Throws Gas on 'Racism' Fire. [Scroll down] [The] "World's Greatest Newspaper" slogan later disappeared from
the front page [of the Chicago Tribune] on December 31, 1976. Had it not, this week would have prompted its immediate
removal, as the 2021 lame version of the Tribune foisted an incendiary and poorly-sourced news item on readers with the
headline "Study shows any contact with police may be detrimental to health, well-being of Black youth." Call me crazy,
but it seems to me that in a city that is already the undisputed Murder Capital Of America (thanks, Lori Lightfoot) and which
this week actually saw demonstrators picketing and demanding the removal of the CEO of McDonald's for the "microaggression"
of implying gangbangers may not make good parents... a newspaper throwing gasoline on the "racism" fire is probably the last
thing any responsible publication would do. [...] The entire basis of this article is a "study" printed in September in the
Journal Of The American Medical Association's Pediatrics Review... not exactly a voice of reason.
A Flood Of Superficial
Climate Reports. This past week, the Biden administration doubled down in its campaign against climate change
with the release of a suite of four reports, on national defense, financial risk, homeland security, and migration.
These reports all start with the common premise that the climate crisis is now upon us in full fury. Moreover, they
also all insist that the issues at hand are nonpolitical, and that the objective at all times is "to be guided by the best
available science and data." To say the least, however, the claim looks hollow, given that none of these reports offers
any data whatsoever to support its major contentions. [...] Sadly, instead of asking any hard questions, these reports just
take the worst-case scenario for granted and move on.
The crafty
language of climate alarmism. When really bad, damaging weather hits it is normal to declare a federal
disaster. This which allows Federal agencies to take certain actions, including loans and tax relief. This is
done at the county scale. So [The Washington Post] looked at all of the disaster declarations in the last three months
and determined the cumulative fraction of the US population that lived in those counties. [...] The stretching begins when
they report their study. First we get the headline, which is all that most people will read. Here is the main
headline: "Nearly 1 in 3 Americans experienced a weather disaster this summer" This assumes that somehow every
person living in every county "experienced" the local disaster. The number of people that physically experienced these
disasters is actually quite small. In some cases, like flash floods, most of the county never knew it had happened
until they heard the news. In the hurricane cases a lot of people were not there, while others simply watched it rain
really hard. Losing electricity, while unpleasant, is hardly experiencing a disaster.
Media
Test Positive For Corrupt COVID Coverage. Policymakers and public health officials need to be held accountable
for their miserable pandemic failures. So should the media, which have no interest in objective news, and are following
an agenda that is both repulsive and poisonous. Among the media's favorite stories of the past 18 months are the deaths
of the unvaccinated and those who expressed skepticism about the lethality of the Wuhan coronavirus. A recent example
is the death of a 40-year-old California woman, who, according to the British Daily Mail, "regularly posted anti-vax,
anti-mask content, proclaiming herself a 'free thinker' who 'questions everything.'" The mother of four — who
also considered herself "unmuzzled" — "had been battling COVID-19 and resulting pneumonia ahead of her passing."
Tragic as her death was, it would not have been covered by the media had she been vaccinated and cheerfully compliant with
lockdown and mask rules. But in the twisted minds of most of today's journalists, it's a story that has to be told to
boost their vanity. They are our moral superiors.
ABC
Takes Victory Lap After Smeared BP Agents Are Put on Desk Duty. Border Patrol was already stretched dangerously
thin but on Wednesday [9/22/2021], ABC's World News Tonight celebrated their job getting harder as multiple mounted
agents were ordered to "administrative duties" after the rabid left and liberal media smeared them with lies about using
"whips" on Haitian migrants. As NewsBusters had documented all week, ABC anchor David Muir and correspondent Kenneth
Moton were committed to parroting the ignorant White House talking point about how the images were "horrific." "This
scene along the southern border tonight. Texas Governor Greg Abbott using state-owned vehicles to create what he's calling a
'steel barrier,' with the migrant crisis on the border. And there is news tonight involving some of those Border Patrol
agents seen on horseback, confronting migrants," Muir announced in his opening tease.
There
Are No Bathrooms at the Border, and Other Shocking Revelations. Molly Hennessy-Fiske of the Los Angeles
State Media Times was literally shook to discover just how "dismal" things have become in
migrant camps along the border. I don't mean to make light of the harrowing conditions at the border. Regardless
of the cause, it's not nice to witness humans in peril, even of their own making. What I am making light of is the L.A.
Times and their ilk finding a "story" in the obvious and calling it news. The very obvious truth is and has always been
the same: there aren't restrooms at the border. It's not because the United States hates desperate immigrants or
even desperate Haitian immigrants or the despotic coyotes who exploit them. There are no bathrooms at the border
because bathrooms don't belong in the middle of nowhere. [...] It obviously comes as a shock to people like Molly Hennessy-Fiske,
who clearly have not spent much time in the middle of nowhere and thus do not understand that bathrooms don't grow in the wild.
Nicolle
Wallace Tells Brian Williams Current Deadly Covid Surge is Like a 9/11 'Every Two Days'. Anchoring coverage of
9/11 memorials on Saturday, MSNBC's Brian Williams and Nicolle Wallace discussed the historic significance of masks at the
events and covid overall in comparison to the terror attacks of that terrible day. Williams brought up the subject by
way of mentioning the ever-present covid masks. "Are you ever struck by the thought that on the 40th, 50th anniversary
we will look back, perhaps, at some of these pictures and be reminded, oh, yeah, that's when we were all wearing masks?" he
said to Wallace. "That's when even our presidents and former presidents had to wear masks in public because of our
uncontrolled pandemic in 2021?" "Well, I think there are so many parallels to how much more difficult it is to do any of
the things that anyone who has spoken today has done, to call the country to a higher purpose," Wallace replied.
"You've got politicians and prominent folks in the media outraged by steps that a president, not too many presidents after
the one we heard from today, would try to save his country from an unthinkable death toll."
The Editor says...
[#1] There is no "uncontrolled pandemic." If you turn off your television, you won't see sick people anywhere, and
your life will return to pre-2020 normal in no time. [#2] I'll take my chances with the relatively small
"death toll." Tyranny is worse than disease. Diseases eventually go away. Tyranny does not.
CNN
Host, PBS Star Agree 1/6 Is As Big as the Civil War, World War 2. As we have all learned from Joe Biden's
presidency, the phoniest/baloney-est claim from liberals is that they have a deep desire for national unity. There is
no unity in compromise, only in surrender to the Left. At the end of Sunday's [9/5/2021] Reliable Sources,
fill-in host John Avlon interviewed the PBS gasbag Ken Burns, asking him about national unity, and he's as phony as
Biden. This is CNN, so Avlon demands unity in exaggerating the January 6 riot: [Video clip] [...] How does
anyone compare the January 6 riot to World War II or the Civil War? It's like comparing Hiroshima to the Portland
riots. Liberals love to pose that they are against "partisan echo chambers." They actually say this with a
straight face on CNN... and on PBS.
It's the old "phony struggling against the wind" act. Weather
Channel Busted In Their Coverage Of Hurricane Ida: Utility Worker Trolls Fake News Reporter. On the 16th
anniversary of Hurricane Katrina, some forecasters said Hurricane Ida would be as intense as last year's Laura and the Last
Island Hurricane of 1856. Both were among the strongest storms on record to make landfall in Louisana. According to
CNN, about half a million people were without power in the region. [...] The situation is already serious and there is no
need for the media to make things [appear] even more serious. A quick clip caught a man doing a cartwheel during
Weather Channel reporter Jim Cantore's live shot on Sunday amid Hurricane Ida. [...] In another video, Jim is looking like he
is on his last legs but the situation at the moment is probably not that serious as a utility worker trolls him.
[Video clip]
Chicken little
is real. A recent front-page headline in my local paper read as follows: "County bordering on high virus
transmission rate." A doctor with a large regional health system was concerned that the COVID-19 transmission rate had
increased by 37% in one week and stated, "A transmission rate above 5% from the prior week is very scary." It seems
useful to provide some context regarding numbers such as these, considering all the numbers being thrown around regarding
COVID-19, the apparent push to create a panic over the Delta variant of COVID-19, the obvious push for everyone to get
vaccinated, and the fact that the United States is ranked so poorly in math and science. The first number to be
considered is the 37% increase. It certainly looked pretty bad, but percentages do not always provide an accurate
picture. The county-wide cases went from 11 to 15 during the week in question, an increase of four cases. So, a
37% increase does not seem to be all that concerning given a population of over 91,000 people.
MSNBC
Contributor Spews HATE: Fox News Is Al Jazeera, Trump Is Bin Laden. Jonathan Capehart's Sunday show on MSNBC
devoted a segment today [8/1/2021] to slamming Fox News for its coverage of the January 6th Capitol breach. And NBC
contributor Dean Obeidallah slimed Fox News as Al Jazeera and analogized Donald Trump to the greatest mass-murdering
terrorist in US history. When columnist Miami Herald columnist Leonard Pitts asked what people would sacrifice,
Capehart responded by claiming that Fox News and Republicans on Capitol Hill "have sacrificed their soul." A bit later,
Capehart, somewhat out of left field, blurted out that "whiteness is a [...] drug." But capping all the inane commentary
was Dean Obeidallah. He said that Fox News is "the Al Jazeera of America after 9/11." Plumbing even more absurd
depths, Obeidallah claimed that President Trump is "the Osama bin Laden of January 6th."
The Panic Pandemic. The United
States suffered through two lethal waves of contagion in the past year and a half. The first was a viral pandemic that
killed about one in 500 Americans — typically, a person over 75 suffering from other serious conditions. The
second, and far more catastrophic, was a moral panic that swept the nation's guiding institutions. [...] The panic was
started, as usual, by journalists. As the virus spread early last year, they highlighted the most alarming statistics
and the scariest images: the estimates of a fatality rate ten to 50 times higher than the flu, the chaotic scenes
at hospitals in Italy and New York City, the predictions that national health-care systems were about to collapse. The
full-scale panic was set off by the release in March 2020 of a computer model at the Imperial College in London, which
projected that — unless drastic measures were taken — intensive-care units would have 30 Covid patients
for every available bed and that America would see 2.2 million deaths by the end of the summer. The British
researchers announced that the "only viable strategy" was to impose draconian restrictions on businesses, schools, and social
gatherings until a vaccine arrived. This extraordinary project was swiftly declared the "consensus" among public-health
officials, politicians, journalists, and academics.
Dear
Reporters: The Capitol Riot Was Not 9/11, and the story is not about the media. There is a faction of the
news media that seems stuck on January 6. They need to get some perspective. And political hucksters who
claim that the Capitol riot was worse than the September 11 attacks deserve all the derision they get. One symptom
of the January 6 fixation is a recent Vice article entitled, "'So, So Angry': Reporters Who Survived the Capitol Riot
Are Still Struggling." [...] Get over yourselves. The Capitol Hill press corps are not the first people to deal with a
traumatic event and be expected to keep doing their jobs. This was not the worst of those, and some of those other
events were also wholly or partly the work of political actors. Ask any of us who went through September 11.
Pandemics are
staged on Television. When a new epidemic is launched and promoted, despite the lack of good science and good
evidence, it is jacked up on television screens. Images begin to flow: An emergency medical vehicle on a
street. EMT personnel, in hazmat suits, load a man strapped down to a stretcher, into the van. On another street,
a man collapses on the sidewalk. We see a quarantined man sitting inside a huge plastic bubble on a third street.
Cut to an airport lobby. Soldiers are patrolling the space among the crowds. Cut to a lab. Close-up of
vials of liquid. Camera pulls back. Techs in light green scrubs are placing the vials into slots of a table-top
machine. Auditorium — a man on a platform, wearing a doctor's white coat, is pointing a wand at a large
screen, on which a chart is displayed, for the audience. Back to the street. People are wearing face masks.
These images wash over the television viewer. Meanwhile, the anchor is imparting his prepared meaning: "The
government today issued a ban on all travel into and out of the city... hundreds of plane flights have been cancelled.
Scientists are rushing to develop a vaccine..." The television audience has an IMPRESSION of knowing something.
The
Left Is Now Scaremongering The COVID 'Delta Variant'. COVID-19 infection rates are down. Deaths are
down. Vaccinations are up. So what's the response from the left? It continues a desperate attempt to scare
the public and blame Republicans. The left's bellwether outlet, the New York Times, perfectly sums up this agenda with
a story headlined "Red America's COVID Problem," in which the Times writes that "COVID remains a serious threat to
unvaccinated adults, especially those middle-aged or older" and that it's rising in Trump-supporting areas of the country
where vaccination rates, they say, are lower. "No wonder, then, that the number of new cases keeps falling in Biden
counties, while it has begun to rise in Trump counties," the Times goes on. The Washington Post's increasingly leftist
"conservative" columnist Jennifer Rubin declares that "Red states are dangerous to America's health."
Washington
Post reporter troubled by 'racist legacy' of some birds. According to The Washington Post, it's hunting season
for cancel culture and its latest targets are "racist" birds. The Post ran an expansive report on Thursday, titled "The
racist legacy many birds carry," focused on the "birding community," which apparently is having a difficult debate "about the
names of species connected to enslavers, supremacists and grave robbers." "Corina Newsome is a Black ornithologist, as
rare as some of the birds she studies," Post environmental justice reporter Darryl Fears began his piece, noting she was
hired to "break down barriers" at the Georgia Audubon nature preserve.
The Editor says...
Lots of places and things are named after badly flawed people. Get over it.
The people insisting on renaming them all are at least as badly flawed.
Someone
Needs to Do a Wellness Check Over at CNN. You'd think a "news" network that exists to shill and promote the
party that gained power in the 2020 election would take a deep breath, but things have only spiraled further for the liberal
outlet. [...] CNN and the media at large have reached the point of complete derangement. They see doom and destruction
around every corner, well, unless it's coming from any facet of the left. In that case, they'll make excuses for
torching cities and killing cops. Regardless, imagine waking up this morning and putting together that homepage and
thinking you are emotionally healthy?
How
the American Media Perpetuates and Profits from Mass Shootings. The American media currently has no industry
standard practices for how to cover either suicides or mass shootings. However, one can easily see the difference
between how mass shootings and suicides are covered. Whereas suicides are treated as somber tragedies, mass shootings
often have the sensationalism turned up to 11. There's a detailed discussion of the shooter's life story, motives and
methods. Strong evidence suggests that this both encourages and instructs potential mass shooters.
Oprah's
new AppleTV+ show says celebrities aren't like the rest of us. If you want to know what's going on in the
world, don't (really, don't) look at the New York Times or Washington Post. From them, you get only Democrat
partisan spin. Instead, check out the Daily Mail, an enlivening mix of news and gossip that, despite grammatically
awful writing, manages to get a lot of information (and dreck) across. What it succeeded in doing on Friday was to
reveal the mental damage that affects so many of the celebrities who opine about and dangerously affect America's
values. AppleTV+ has released a series of interviews between Oprah and Harry (the prince formerly known as Prince) in
which we are given a pathetic insight into the mind of a marginally intelligent, minimally informed man who tragically lost
his mother in the most explosive way. It shouldn't surprise anyone that he has emotional issues or that he married a
woman who knows how to manipulate all of them.
If
There's Nothing to Hide, Why Are Democrats Freaking Out about the Arizona Audit? If you have been keeping an
eye on the election audit taking place right now in Maricopa County, Arizona, then you also know that Democrats, news
propagandists, and "concerned" NeverTrump Republicans are beginning to sound more and more like trapped rats squeaking in
fear. An army of lawyers — many of the same political operatives who manipulated the November election by
contravening existing election laws and flooding battleground states with uncontrolled and unverified mail-in
ballots — are begging state and federal courts to stop the audit midcourse and petitioning Arizona's Democrat
secretary of state and Merrick Garland's Department of Justice to intervene under the absurd pretense that ensuring election
integrity somehow deprives voters of their civil rights. Arizonan and Biden-supporter Cindy McCain has publicly called
the vote recount "ludicrous" because "the election is over." And MSNBC's Rachel Maddow is so terrified of what the auditors
might find that she insists that the whole exercise is not only "dangerous," but also the "end of democracy."
Are
Covid Fatalities Comparable with the 1918 Spanish Flu? [Scroll down] It is common to invoke comparisons
with the 1918 Flu Pandemic, as that was an extremely devastating virus that rocked the world. The article makes
multiple references to the 1918 pandemic but there are a couple that raise interesting questions for further investigation.
The first point is as follows, "Combined with deaths in the first few months of this year, Covid-19 has now claimed more than
half a million lives in the United States. The total number of Covid-19 deaths so far is on track to surpass the
toll of the 1918 pandemic, which killed an estimated 675,000 nationwide." Comparing the death counts between the
1918 Flu and Covid-19 without adjusting for population growth is extremely misleading. In 1918 the population
of the United States was roughly 103 million, while near the end of 2020 it stood at roughly 330 million.
The
True Lunacy of Reparations. With race relations apparently having a permanent place in the headlines and
radical race activists doing all they can to keep us at each others' throats, we once again have the race-baiters out there
calling for — you guessed it, reparations. And when I say "back in the headlines," I mean that the "racial
tensions" are a story because the media have a massive vested interest in keeping them in the headlines. One of the
media's goals is to keep Americans angry and believing that we all hate each other, because the headline "Everyone Is Getting
Along Today" doesn't sell newspapers or advertising space and doesn't generate the Almighty Click.
Derek
Chauvin — The great white defendant. Cable channel HLN has covered the trial from gavel to
gavel. When bumping in and out of commercial breaks, HLN displayed a graphic, accompanied by foreboding music, showing
two fists tearing an American flag in half, with the caption "America's Very Soul Is on Trial." Black Lives Matter activist
Maya Echols, in a since-deleted TikTok video, said: "If George Floyd's murderer is not sentenced, just know that all
hell is gonna break loose. Don't be surprised when building are on fire. Just sayin'." And Rep. Maxine
Waters, D-Calif., says she is "hopeful" of a conviction, but if not, Waters said: "We've got to stay on the street and
we've got to get more active, we've got to get more confrontational. We've got to make sure that they know we mean
business." No, America's "very soul" is not on trial.
Globalists
Will Need Another Crisis In America As Their Reset Agenda Fails. The mainstream media is pushing a non-stop
narrative of covid mutation hype. We hear about UK and Brazilian variants on a weekly basis, and the assertion has been
that surely, these variants will be more infectious and more deadly that the original virus. There is still no proof
whatsoever to confirm this, but the globalists only care about planting the idea in people's heads. They only care
about reigniting the fear. My feeling is that this strategy is going to fail, at least in the US. Too many Americans
are aware of the con game, and a new virus threat is not going to have the same effect as Covid-19 did in the early months of
the pandemic. None of us really knew what we were facing back then, and caution was a practical response. Today,
we know for a fact that covid is not a concern for the vast majority of the public. Media attempts to amp up the threat
will be ineffective, but they will of course still try.
Coordinated propaganda: Major
News Outlets Pledge to Begin Calling 'Climate Change' a 'Climate Emergency'. A number of major news
organizations worldwide, ranging from Scientific American and The Columbia Journalism Review to The
Guardian and Al Jazeera, have signed a pledge to begin referring to "climate change" as a "climate emergency" in
their reporting. "Scientific American has agreed with major news outlets worldwide to start using the term 'climate
emergency' in its coverage of climate change," the publication announced Monday in a tweet to its 3.9 million followers
touting "the impact we hope it can have throughout the media landscape." "We Are Living in a Climate Emergency, and
We're Going to Say So," the headline of a Scientific American commentary published Monday declares. Claiming
that that climate change is "the biggest environmental emergency to beset the earth in millennia," the piece announces the
name change: "Given the circumstances, Scientific American has agreed with major news outlets worldwide to start using
the term 'climate emergency' in its coverage of climate change."
CBS
reportedly paid $7M for Prince Harry, Meghan Markle interview. CBS reportedly paid more than $7 million for the
rights to air Oprah Winfrey's highly anticipated tell-all interview with Prince Harry and Duchess of Sussex Meghan Markle.
The two-hour interview, set to air at 8 p.m. Sunday [3/7/2021], cost the network a pretty penny — likely
somewhere between $7 million and $9 million, the Wall Street Journal reported. CBS bought the lucrative
rights — the network is charging $325,000 for every 30 seconds of commercial time — from Winfrey's
Harpo Productions, and can also license the interview in international markets. A spokesman for the Sussexes' told the
Journal they were not paid for the interview.
Press
focuses on Ted Cruz, ignores the building crisis at the border. The media is intent on reporting on Ted Cruz's
one-day trip to Cancun, because it wants to divert attention from Joe Biden's intentional destruction of America. It is
the same reason they lied that Biden was a 'moderate' during the election and why they buried the stories of all the Biden
family corruption while they were effectively campaigning and de facto contributing to Biden. The truth would have
destroyed Biden. The media manipulated and colluded in the election more than Russia or even China has ever done.
Biden is violating his oath of office to uphold immigration laws while flooding Texas and other states with illegals,
including many violent criminals, yet Cruz should resign because he left the U.S. for a day?
Fake News Wannabes.
We had a pretty good snowstorm the other day. I switched on the local news when I got up, naively imagining that they
would give me a little useful information in between their usual dire warnings not to leave my home. For the first time
that I can remember they weren't much interested in ice or snow. They were concerned, instead, that the weather not
deter me from going to my local vaccination center. They wanted to educate me, too, that today was the first day of
Black History Month, that blacks die at three times the rate of whites from COVID-19, and that the black vote was suppressed
in the recent election. You remember that election? The same one that the same station had declared, with smug
satisfaction, that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris won easily. On the following day, a glutton for punishment, I watched
these journalistic titans show a teaser for their upcoming investigative report — on the topic of the rise of
extremism in America. I didn't need to actually watch to know that they would not be talking about Antifa or Black
Lives Matter. Their extremists are my friends and neighbors. The American middle class. You
know — that majority far-right fringe.
How your
Washington news gets distorted by media priorities. You may not see much news coverage on the world's 100,000
airplane flights that land safely every day. Let one of them crash, however, and you'll see smoldering wreckage and
sobbing relatives for 24 hours. It's the same in news coverage of U.S. politics. Now for the first time in memory
a research team has examined thousands of news interview transcripts and documented what might seem an obvious but very important
conclusion: Extreme views and words by far get the most attention, air time and views online. People who speak in
moderate tones with reasonable views pretty much get ignored or forgotten. [...] The lesson in all this — especially
for House members who must campaign every two years — is that being the mouthiest, loudest, most extreme interview and
speaker is the way to get noticed by mass media. And they often stage conflict and confrontations to obtain media attention.
California,
land of delusion. The latest verbal gymnastics our local San Francisco Bay Area, 11 o'clock news team tried and
failed to explain was why, when COVID cases are rapidly plummeting, we are not opening the state. There are only five
counties that have "graduated" out of the deadly Purple Tier as of this morning [2/21/2021]. After months of touting
the so-called crisis in ICU capacity, now we get no mention of that issue. Instead, we're treated to ten minutes of
proud stories about massive new vaccination sites. These are immediately followed by stories about the lack of
available vaccine doses. It's almost funny. We are exhorted to do our duty and get vaccinated, for the common
good, if we can find any vaccine. I know people who desperately wanted it and had to drive for hours to locate doses.
Personally, I wouldn't get the vaccine. But that's another story.
Expect Overheated
Climate Reports Advancing Radical Energy Agendas. Don't be either surprised or alarmed to see lots of
authoritative-sounding "hottest time ever" media reports in advance of President Biden's pledge to recommit America to the
2015 Paris Climate Agreement and support for his all-out war on fossil energy aimed at eliminating carbon emissions from
electricity by 2035, and achieving "net-zero carbon emissions" by 2050. An example appeared in a January 26 Wall
Street Journal editorial "World's Ice is Melting Faster than Ever" citing "a new satellite study" which concluded that global
melting had dangerously accelerated 65% between 1994 and 2017. The research was conducted by a team of legitimate
scientists from the U.K.'s University of Leeds Centre for Polar Observation and Modeling, the University of Edinburgh,
University College London and an Edinburgh-based climate data company called Earth Wave Ltd. Where the study
conclusions go feverishly wrong concerns altogether unsupportable speculations that the melting was "driven by rising
atmospheric and ocean temperatures resulting from greenhouse gas emissions."
Something's
in a nosedive. Scary news stories are the norm in the Age of COVID. Earlier this month, on January 2, 2021,
The Hill reported that experts at the University of Washington's Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) predicted
150,000 deaths by the beginning of February. Just one problem: Recent data suggest that the worst of the pandemic
is over. In the interest of unity, let's analyze the COVID data on daily new cases and deaths from the New York
Times — in particular, the seven-day moving averages. Using a moving average is important since there are
obvious reporting problems from the relevant state agencies. The raw daily data have a suspiciously consistent
saw-tooth pattern. There is an unrealistic drop on weekends and holidays and a corresponding explosion during
mid-week. Using the seven-day moving average effectively eliminates the reporting problems by incorporating data over
the prior week. Looking at the curves for new cases and deaths, the NYT data show something perplexing. As seen
in the graphs, the curves are going the wrong way for nightmare scenarios. According to the NYT data, the IHME's
January model's prediction of 150,000 deaths is a fantasy.
First
Duty of the Press: Make It About Race. Even after a mob of Trump supporters stormed the Capitol on Jan.
6, the media felt the need to pile up the false accusations. Their first order of business was to turn it into a story
about race. The Trump riot has as little to do with race as any story in 21st-century America. COVID,
immigration, tax cuts, the stimulus — I could come up with a racial angle for any of those. Your
assignment: Make the siege at the Capitol a story primarily about race relations. You, a normal person, one week
later: I'm stumped. But to our media, the main point to be made about the riot was: Can you imagine what
would have happened if black people had done that?
Imagine being
this detached from reality. This installment of unhinged hysterics comes to us from NBC News.
["]WASHINGTON — After last week's deadly assault on the U.S. Capitol by supporters of President Donald
Trump, members of Congress are expressing something once unthinkable: that some of their own colleagues may be endangering
their lives. Not in a rhetorical sense, but in a direct and immediate way.["] Yes, some Democrats in
congress are genuinely worried that their conservative colleagues are going to actually murder them.
Do
Not Believe These People. Maybe I'm just cynical, which I know I am, but every single time one of those
teleprompter-reading TV personalities masquerading as journalists use a phrase like "It's a sad day" or "It's impacted all of
us," I want to throw up. There has never been a phonier, less trustworthy group of people with more influence in
history. When idiots stormed the Capitol building, the pearl clutchers went into overdrive with the "this is horrible
to see" and some "this is a tragedy" talk. Yes, both are true, but does anyone believe they actually feel any of it
personally? Why would anyone care about a country when they hold half its citizens in contempt?
News readers consider themselves heroes, until the moment they consider themselves victims. Jim
Acosta goes after Trump supporters: 'A number of us received death threats... we feel endangered'. CNN's prima
donna White House correspondent Jim Acosta became a household name not for his reporting, but for his politically-motivated
clashes with President Donald Trump. Acosta has also targeted the president's supporters, only to then complain that he
was receiving death threats, which helped ensure that he remained the center of attention.
The worst-case scenario is the only one that sells newspapers, books, or cable news. MSNBC
Doom and Gloom Doc: Don't Get Overly Optimistic About the Covid-19 Vaccine, We're in For a "Decades-Long Battle". MSNBC
rolled out a doom and gloom doc Thursday morning [12/24/2020] who warned Americans not to get overly optimistic about a Covid vaccine
because we are in for a "decades-long battle." Dr. William Haseltine promoted his books on Covid as he fear-mongered.
Dr. Haseltine doesn't want Americans to forget about Covid and go on with their lives because he has books to sell.
How dumb would you have to be, to believe this? So dumb that you'd intentionally watch CNN? CNN's
Sciutto: Trump Not Conceding Could Put America in 'Potential Danger' for Another 9/11. CNN anchor Jim
Sciutto said Wednesday on CNN's "Newsroom" that President Donald Trump's refusal to concede the 2020 presidential election
could put America at risk for a terrorist attack like the 9/11 attacks. Co-anchor Poppy Harlow asked, "Yes or no, are
the actions of the president is taking now putting this country in danger?" Former Bush administration assistant Attorney
General Jack Goldsmith said, "Clearly, it's not great for our democracy." Sciutto said, "Yep, that's it fair. Let's
put some teeth on that if we can for a moment because they are sitting members of Congress who were around in their positions
at the time of 9/11, and the 9/11 commission report specifically cited the shortened transition after the 2000 election for
having an impact on national security. I'm quoting here, 'It hampered the new administration in identifying, recruiting,
clearing and obtaining Senate confirmation of key appointees.'[...]"
The Editor says...
Whose fault was that? Who tore all the "W" keys off the White House typewriters
in January 2001?
It wasn't a bunch of Republicans! This whole argument is a red herring anyway, but the Left could at least
come up with an honest analogy.
COVID
Panic Porn is Meant to Suppress Trump Vote, But It May Do the Opposite. Right on schedule, the panic pornsters
are shrieking in unison that COVID-19 cases in the United States are on the rise. Virtually overnight, dozens of
stories have appeared in the press, on the internet, or broadcast on the nightly news about the renewed danger. [...]
Grim-faced broadcasters on CNN and MSNBC might as well be wearing death masks as they solemnly intone the latest numbers of
those who test positive. They even throw in the story of an untimely death or two to add a human interest element to
their tale of woe. Somehow, however, they never find time to mention that mortality rates are way, way down. It's
always how we're all going to die from the China Virus.
'Truth' Over Facts.
In his memoir, Banana Sunday, the late British newspaperman Christopher Munnion described his first encounter with
what was then called New Journalism. This was a style of newswriting that got going in the 1960s and 1970s. It
was more like long-form fiction than conventional reporting. [...] The new style of journalist came to the story with a
narrative in mind. He was a storyteller who would provide the reader with a sense of what it was like to be in the
story, at least the story the writer wanted to tell. As Munnion explained, the journalist showed up with a prepared
narrative and then went around looking for people, events, and images to fill in the details. The facts were mere
ornaments to decorate the story, not the point of the story.
Vile
Scarborough: You're 'Un-American' If You Vote for Trump. While most left-wing journalists try to channel
all their anger at President Trump, they will occasionally go straight to the punch and just start attacking people who
support him. On Tuesday morning [10/20/2020], the co-hosts of MSNBC's Morning Joe scolded American voters who
dare, for any reason, to vote for Trump. With Election Day exactly two weeks away, and millions of Americans already
voting, co-hosts Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski decided it was time to launch a brutal verbal assault against Trump
supporters. Apparently triggered by Trump speaking publicly about the Biden family's alleged corruption on Monday,
Scarborough whined that it's unacceptable to vote for him for any reason.
QAnon:
The Media's Latest Obsession. Big media has had multiple obsessions during President Trump's first term.
From Stormy and Avenatti to the myriad tell-all books about Trump, his administration, and his family. From Russia and
an innocuous phone call to Ukraine, to his taxes and how many scoops of ice cream he is served. These are all red
herrings, a way to pick at Trump while studiously avoiding serious policy issues, what he is actually accomplishing as
president, promises made becoming promises kept. The latest obsession is QAnon, in the media and recently at the NBC
town hall event. Despite being billed as a question and answer session, it was more of a debate between President Trump
and NBC's partisan newsreader Savannah Guthrie. Of all the issues facing America in 2020 and of concern to voters,
QAnon is not on the list. Yet she laser focused on QAnon starting with[,] "Let me ask you about QAnon" to which Trump
responded, "I know nothing about QAnon." Rather than moving on to the economy or healthcare, she obsessively persisted,
insisting that Trump denounce "the fringe conspiracy theory."
The
End of Covid Hysteria. Most of the nation was stunned by the news that Donald and Melania Trump had contracted
COVID. [...] The amount of insanity and hysteria poured into Trump's diagnosis by the Democrat/media complex the rest of the
weekend was almost funny to watch. Did his doctor lie? Did he lie? What about the 25th Amendment, the
procedure of presidential replacement, the coming election, the pending Supreme Court appointment, the number of people
surrounding him who were infected? How dare he take a five-minute ride with Secret Service agents to thank his well
wishers! Non-stop around the clock hysteria. Almost none of it was helpful, and most of it was true as believing
the sky is falling. Gotta love our responsible, fact-driven media.
Corporate
Media Is Vomiting Trump Coronavirus Reporting All Over The Bed. The latest news cycle over President Trump's
COVID-19 diagnosis illustrates yet again how destructive the U.S. corporate media are to national unity and a clear
understanding of reality. While we are all aware that COVID-19 can be a truly devastating and deadly disease for some,
despite the volume of media coverage dedicated to it in the past seven months, the American public still lacks crucial
context for understanding Trump's diagnosis. Not only has major media coverage not brought clarity, but it has also, as
usual, obscured reality. This is especially harmful to a story with such significant potential ramifications for the
nation and world. As the president himself has alluded to in his post-diagnosis social media posts, it's common
knowledge that the Wuhan virus hits the elderly especially hard. Trump is 74. Yet even among his age demographic,
surviving the disease, not death, is by far the norm.
Here
Were CNN's WORST Moments Immediately After Trump's COVID Diagnosis. Throughout Friday's early hours, CNNers
repeatedly expressed best wishes to President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump after having tested positive for the
coronavirus. But behind those best wishes, CNN not only levied their usual, poisonous rhetoric, but plenty of
subliminal levels of apocalyptic brainstorming, gloating, and calls for a return to global lockdowns. Perhaps worst of
all, it led off CNN analyst and former Obama flack Sam Vinograd claiming the President's diagnosis could "be the most
dangerous moment that the U.S. government has ever faced." No word on why the Civil War, Cuban Missile Crisis, four
presidential assassinations, September 11, 2001, or two World Wars tested America and her government less.
Please
spare me the maudlin rhetoric about Ginsburg's 'tragic' death. The insufferable Chris Wallace of Fox News kept
referring to the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg as "tragic" on yesterday's [9/20/2020] edition of Fox News
Sunday. While I am full of sympathy for her family, loved ones, and friends who all have lost someone they deeply mourn,
I cannot see how her death is "tragic" — unless one is a partisan Democrat fearing loss of control of the Supreme
Court. Justice Ginsburg lived to a ripe old age and remained active until almost the very end of her life. As
even President Trump stated, she lived an "amazing life" and lived it to the full until the end. We all are
mortal! Dying itself, while sad for those left behind, is not a tragedy.
What
Has 2020 Taught Us? [Scroll down] Then the riots started. Then the fires, the hurricanes, the
election. I do hope that with all this practice we've learned courage, and that we've learned we must depend on God and
His infinite mercy. We cannot fight this on our own. We also should have developed an antipathy towards the
media. They have been culpable in spreading and stoking these fears. They have twisted statistics, adulterated
the language, slung clueless accusations, and propped up asinine excuses for the violence.
Eyes
Are Rolling After 'Journalist' Jon Karl Equates Covering Trump Rallies to Taking Family Trip to Fallujah. Every
once in a while, the masks completely slip off and supposedly objective journalists accidentally reveal in no uncertain terms
what their political colors to their readers and viewers. Such was the case earlier this week when former White House
Correspondents' Association president and ABC News White House correspondent Jon Karl talked to National Journal, which did a
story on how "the White House press corps finally drew the line" Sunday on covering President Trump's indoor campaign
rallies, which they apparently find hazardous to their health in the age of the Wuhan coronavirus.
The Editor says...
The left-wing news media wants everyone in America to live in constant fear of the coronavirus (and the rioters, and the Russians,
and 5G telephone service, and earthquakes, and hurricanes). They want Americans to believe that it's dangerous to walk into a
crowd without a face mask. I'm not buying it. It wasn't unsafe a year ago, and it's not unsafe today. From where
I'm sitting, it appears that the coronavirus crisis, if there really was one, is over now. As soon as the presidential election is
over, the news media will forget all about it, because America can go back to (the old) normal at any moment — just as
soon as somebody sends out the "all clear" decree.
The Truth
About Slavery. We are continually misled by progressive propaganda on the issue of race. Misinformation
bleeds over to the conservative realm as well. The media, Hollywood, and academia are consumed with race, tribalism,
and hatred for our Founding. The real agenda here is power, divide and conquer to pursue some ill-conceived
Utopia. The truth is that violence is part of the Left's playbook. They are opportunists and provocateurs ready
for any excuse to attack our freedom. Much of the violence we see is a planned political strategy taking advantage of
the crisis du jour. Racism is not our Achilles Heel. It is the ubiquitous manipulation and exploitation of race
and racism that threatens our way of life. Political operatives masquerading as journalists feed the hate 24/7.
The
Black New Deal: 1) Abolish Welfare 2) Incentivize The Nuclear Family. [Scroll down] The time for black
complaints is over. Slavery happened in America like it has happened in every culture around the world since the
beginning of time. Slavery has been prohibited in the West, and apart from communist China and parts of Egypt, most of
the East. Moreover, as recent studies have shown, racial police brutality has declined to the point of statistical
insignificance. The raison d'etre for the Black Lives Matter organization is a rounding error. Recent spikes in
crime aside, broadly speaking, America has never been safer. So why does everything feel worse? For one, media
and technology. Mainstream media, citizen journalism, and nonstop social media all contribute to the sense that our
racial divide is at the root of all evil.
MSNBC's
Biden Backers Demand Voters End Trump's 'Reign of Terror'. On Sunday afternoon's MSNBC Live with Alex Witt,
during a discussion of President Donald Trump's use of federal agents to counteract rioters in Portland and how it might
impact this year's presidential election, MSNBC contributor and liberal historian Jon Meacham conflated segregationist
Democrat George Wallace with non-segregationist Republican conservatives like Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan and Barry
Goldwater. After Meacham encouraged viewers to vote against President Trump's "reign of terror" in November, MSNBC
Republican Michael Steele agreed with him and encouraged Democrats to turn out to vote against the President.
The
Left is signing up citizens to physically remove President Trump from office if he loses. The left continued to
spread the narrative that President Donald Trump may refuse to leave the White House if he loses the election in
November. And left-wing political commentator and Young Turks host Cenk Uygur added to the conspiracy theories on
Tuesday [7/21/2020] as he, too, offered a way to rid the country of the president in case the United States military "does
not remove him from office" after a supposed loss in November.
Media
Malpractice on COVID Numbers. COVID-19 data are and have been all over the map since this entire mess gained
steam earlier this year. It has gotten to the point that any "numbers" presented as news are suspect at best and
fraudulent at worst. Is this media incompetence or malpractice? Ignorant or deliberate? Fox News ran a
constant side bar in the early days of the pandemic, with U.S. death counts, much in the way cable news business shows run a
ticker of the Dow or S&P 500. How morbid, but it provided fodder for media talking heads to run around like Kevin
McCallister in Home Alone, waving their arms and screaming in panic. Now that death counts are dropping to the point
that they blend in with normal birth and death statistics, the media have predictably pivoted to case counts as their new
hair-on-fire statistic to stoke fear, keep the economy shut down, and hopefully banish their nemesis back to the land of
Mordor, also known as Mar-a-Lago.
The
Press Is Already Trying To Whip Up A New Pandemic Panic. Oh, no! With the planet still unlocking and some
parts still tightly buttoned down, and with the world economy plummeting, "China Researchers Discover New Swine Flu with
'Pandemic Potential,'" blares CNN. "Scientists Say New Strain of Swine Flu Virus Is Spreading to Humans in China," shrieks
the New York Times. Say it ain't so! Okay, it ain't so. Not in any meaningful way. The media should
go back to "murder hornets," or find another asteroid with a chance in a zillion of hitting Earth.
Not
dying is bad for headlines. As the bumpy COVID-19 path back to normalcy bounces along, you would never know
that we were headed in the right direction. Teasers on television and headlines in newspapers report a "surge" in new
cases of COVID-19 and hospitalizations. The teasers and headlines fail to mention that the most important measure of
our progress in getting ahead of the virus is the number of deaths recorded. The fact that the rate of fatalities to
infection is very low now is seldom if ever mentioned. [...] The CDC data show that as of July 1, 2020, death in people
younger than 25 is less than 170 out of a total of 120,000. It is almost non-pronounceable to state a fatality
rate — too many zeros after the decimal point. My point is this: if you are young and healthy, you have
nothing to fear from the coronavirus except the fear-mongering from the media.
The
Huge Law Enforcement Scandal that Cries Out for Justice. In the American Thinker (June 30), Jack Cashill offers
an eloquent plea for an Atticus Finch to take up the cause of George Zimmerman in suing those responsible for perpetrating
the Trayvon Hoax. There is another case, also in Florida, awaiting its Atticus Finch, the product of an earlier moral
panic, the now largely forgotten "mass sex abuse in daycare" hysteria. These cases, replete with lurid charges the
media mindlessly and breathlessly disseminated in the 1980s and '90s, are today widely recognized as a modern version of the
Salem witch trials of the 1690s, down to allegations of Satanic rituals by caregivers. Despite this, one victim remains
incarcerated. Frank Fuster has now served thirty-five years in prison for a crime not only that he did not commit, but
that never happened. His first parole hearing is scheduled an unbelievable 114 years from now — in March 2134.
Media
Begging for a 'Second Wave'. The media is churning out countless alarmist stories each day about the threat of
COVID-19 and the dangers of societal reopening. "Risk of new lockdown rises with fear of second COVID-19 wave," writes
Reuters, as one example of the genre. These stories generally incite, rather than inform. They cherry-pick facts
and lack context. Only when the COVID picture is viewed in perspective are people able to make wise decisions about
their actions. It should be safe for society to continue broadly reopening while directing resources to specific
at-risk populations, such as nursing homes and prisons, which are more vulnerable.
Don't
fear a coronavirus spike. Mainstream media are sounding the alarm about coronavirus cases spiking across the
South and West. They're distorting the facts to cause panic, instead of reporting the whole truth.
Gov. Cuomo is piling on, accusing states that have reopened of playing politics instead of acting "intelligently."
Sorry, but "intelligent" isn't the word that describes his administration's pandemic response. He caused carnage by
forcing nursing homes to take in infected patients. He also has no good answer for why New Yorkers unfortunate enough
to catch the virus had a worse chance of surviving it than people in other states. The Empire State ranks 48 out of 50
states for survival rates. Dodging accountability for these [...] facts, Cuomo is bragging about his results and
bashing President Trump for encouraging states to reopen. Cuomo is flat wrong: The US daily death count from the
virus is down nearly 80 percent from its peak in March. It's telling that the likes of Cuomo and his media allies don't
focus on death and hospitalization rates anymore, but almost exclusively on infection rates, to build their doom-and-gloom
scenarios.
Brad
Parscale: Campaign Was Not Duped, Media Scared Supporters from Tulsa Rally. Trump 2020 Campaign Manager
Brad Parscale on Sunday [6/21/2020] berated the media for savaging the campaign's small crowd size in Tulsa on Saturday,
despite boasting a million campaign ticket requests beforehand. "For the media to now celebrate the fear that they
helped create is disgusting but typical," Parscale wrote in a lengthy statement to reporters. "And it makes us wonder
why we bother credentialing media for events when they don't do their full jobs as professionals."
Pandemic
to Protests: Coverage Shifted But Outlooks Didn't. After three months of wall-to-wall television coverage
of the COVID-19 pandemic, almost overnight the live infection dashboards and often-uttered phrases like "social distancing"
have all but disappeared, replaced with images of a nation in racial turmoil. How are the major cable news channels
covering the protests and what do their different narratives teach us about how the media frames national events? The
data provide some clues. Since late February, CNN, MSNBC and Fox News have spent at least 15% of their daily airtime
on the pandemic, based on data from the Internet Archive's Television News Archive processed by the GDELT Project. CNN
displayed a live dashboard of infection and death counts a total of nine hours a day, seven days a week. As much as
half of all news coverage worldwide mentioned the virus.
How
do we explain the many thousands of Americans who believe they are entitled to steal? Night after night, we
have watched thieving thugs break windows of small and large businesses, charge into them, and run out with as much
merchandise as they can carry. [...] It is very likely that they are proud of themselves. The media certainly support
them, seem to give them permission. Why do the media do this, support the rioters? Ratings, of course. They
love riots, cherish their power to get them going. They love filming the looting without any police presence to stop
it. Do they care about the lives of the business-owners that are destroyed in the process? Not one bit.
There is not an anchor or guest "analyst" on CNN or MSNBC who feels an iota of compassion for the victim of the destruction
wrought by these riots. To a person, they lend their on-screen approval to the rioters.
Imagining
covid-19 under a normal press. [The New York] Times embraced abnormalcy in August 2016 when it demanded
journalists abandon objectivity when covering Donald John Trump. The Times demanded that journalists treat every
statement by him as a lie that he must somehow prove. The Times also demanded that journalists no longer seek his side
of the story when reporting the news. [...] The Pandemic Panic is on the press, not the president. The press has
politicized the covid-19 response. A normal press would have been careful and balanced in its reporting. This
press is loony. At one press briefing four different reporters in four different ways asked the president if calling
the Chinese Virus the Chinese Virus was racist.
Showboating With
100,000 Dead. On May 27, the American coronavirus death toll rose to six figures: 100,000 lives lost.
That's a very sad number, made sadder when we ponder that the virus prevents loved ones from saying goodbye in person and
makes any funeral an extremely small event. America's largest national newspapers have all made dramatic front pages
out of the number. The New York Times came first on Sunday [5/24/2020], filling its entire front page and three more
pages with names of the victims. USA Today followed on Wednesday with an entire front page in black and white and
photos of the dead. The Washington Post waited until we reached the horrible number but still printed some stories on
the front page.
Carlson:
Liberal Media Are 'Thrilled' with Division, Want People to 'Hate One Another'. Between Wednesday [5/27/2020]
and Thursday nights, Fox News Channel host Tucker Carlson was in rare form when discussing the riots in Minneapolis
supposedly in appropriate response to the heinous, police-involved killing of African-American man George Floyd.
Carlson didn't mince words, noting that "news organizations like CNN" want Americans to "hate one another" and wondering if
liberals would still support rioting if it involved destruction of their property. On Wednesday night, he reminded
viewers of how "[r]ioting is a form of tyranny" and "oppression," but "CNN welcomes it, however, in fact encourages it" since
rioters are instead called "protesters." Carlson added (as he would on Thursday): "America is a diverse country.
Diverse countries only survive if the groups within them can coexist peacefully and thankfully, almost everybody in America
wants to coexist peacefully." However, he noted that liberal media outlets like CNN don't seem keen on that: "[N]ews
organizations like CNN do not want that and that's why every day they work hard to fan racial resentment to make different
groups distrust and hate one another."
Trump wins the
lockdown wars. President Trump has won the lockdown wars as coronavirus-related restrictions on businesses are
eased across the country, so far with few signs of dire health consequences for the population. Just weeks ago, the
question was whether to reopen, with the first states to press ahead accused of engaging in human sacrifice and killing their
residents to appease the "Trump death cult." New York Times columnist Paul Krugman asked, "How many will die for
the Dow?" as recently as Thursday [5/21/2020]. Now, the debate is primarily over how quickly and to what extent
reopening should take place, with the stragglers mainly blue states.
CNN
Becomes Unhinged Because Trump Decided to Golf... Without a Mask. CNN has made a name for themselves as one of
the most anti-Trump networks out there. After all, they heavily pushed "Russia! Russia! Russia!" When
Special Counsel Robert Mueller found no collusion took place between the Trump campaign and Russia, CNN focused their
coverage on Ukraine and a supposed quid pro quo. Then it was impeachment. Anything that is anti-Trump can be
found on CNN. So it's no surprise that one of their photographers captured pictures of President Trump golfing *GASP* without
a mask on Saturday. Not only was he golfing with a few other people but he was riding in his own golf cart.
Liberal
Media Hypocrisy Never Ends. If you watched CNN or MSNBC you'd probably think you're going to die. [...] Daily,
viewers and readers are told they're going to die, that Republicans want them to starve and Democrats are their only hope...
and they believe it. They all believe it. If it's unproven and scary, there is no shortage of media outlets
lining up to spread that story. Is there a link between coronavirus and Kawasaki disease, and inflammatory illness the
strikes children? Journalists have no idea, but there is no shortage of stories about how there might be. Words
like "tied to," "believed caused," and "possibly linked" are common in headlines trying to scare [...] parents thinking about
going outside as their states reopen. Lacking evidence used to stop a story from being run, now it's the basis for them.
Limbaugh
says the media is using their climate change playbook on coronavirus reporting. Conservative radio host Rush
Limbaugh compared the coronavirus to climate change and accused federal health officials and the national media of using a
global pandemic to scare American citizens. "It seems like every day we get some new scare tactic from some supposedly
credible source," Limbaugh said on his nationally syndicated program Thursday. "And what generally happens is after
some reporting of what everybody would consider good news, in less than a day, a couple of stories come along, maybe three,
that try to throw cold water on the good news and make it sound even worse than it was the day before — and that's
what this is."
CNN's
Brian Stelter Melts Down Over Conservative Media Exposing Russiagate Conspiracies. Call it a symptom of Trump Derangement
Syndrome, CNN's Brian Stelter suffered an on-air meltdown Sunday [5/10/2020] over conservative media paying any attention to arguably
the largest spy scandal in American history instead of breathlessly covering ongoing public health pandemic, which, center-right
outlets are still doing.
The Editor says...
I think this exposes the real purpose of the coronavirus hysteria: The media-induced virus panic is deflecting attention away from
the Obama spying scandal, just as it comes to light in the middle of an election year.
CNN,
MSNBC Suffer EPIC Meltdowns Over 'Nuts,' 'Terrifying' Flynn Decision; 'The Fix Is In!' In a Thursday afternoon
that felt like a trip back to life before the coronavirus pandemic, CNN and MSNBC were not only apoplectic over the Department
of Justice dropping its case against retired General Michael Flynn, but despondent over the "demoralizing," "destructive,"
"nuts," and "terrifying" "injustice" that signaled "the collapse of the Justice Department" and "the rule of law."
The
Media Racket And The Coronavirus Numbers Game. The coronavirus is real, and tens of thousands of people around
the world have died from it. But it is not the pandemic we were told it was going to be. That's not a
complaint. If anything it's gratitude. Thank God it hasn't been worse. Unfortunately, in the build-up to
our current reality, the media noticed something — their ratings were up. Obviously, people were tuning in
to find out if they were going to die or not. Telling them it was highly unlikely that they would only drive them back
to their old viewing habits and away from cable news. Print media found the same thing with their traffic. This
terrified Democrats too, with CNN and MSNBC, along with most newspapers, firmly in their camp and eager to spread fear and
blame, something had to be done. They broke out the boxes — a running total, always on screen, of cases and
deaths which, without context, can only scare. The context is never, ever given.
COVID-19 [is] turning out to be huge hoax perpetrated by
media. A recent Stanford University antibody study estimated the fatality rate from the virus is likely 0.1% to
0.2%. The World Health Organization (WHO) had estimated that the death rate was 20 to 30 times higher and called for
isolation policies. On which version do you think the media focused? [...] The media has been hyping COVID-19 since Day
One, alarming Americans to the point where they voluntarily went along with shutting down the entire economy — a
mistake that will likely reverberate for a decade or more. Even as U.S. states begin to re-open — based on
the data, which shows a far lower fatality rate than reported and a much wider spread of the virus — the media
continue to report on what they deem frightening numbers over the deadly virus. They aren't, and it isn't.
COVID-19 is a bad flu at worst. And the media should be held accountable for telling us otherwise before they knew the
facts.
The
Most Tragic Case of Governmental, Medical, and Media Malpractice In the History of the World. [Scroll down] The
little real anecdotal evidence accidentally seeping into mainstream media indicates that the actual fatality rate in our nation from
COVID-19 is less than the fear-merchants are displaying on their "Death Dashboards." Potentially, far less. Unbiased
professional reporting could tell us the real numbers. But then, that's the rub. Much of the liberal mainstream media
signed up for team "Doom and Gloom" from day one. At first, they did so to create as much fear and panic as possible so
they could use COVID-19 as the mother of all click-bait cash cows. Once that was accomplished, many in that same liberal
media chose to keep the fear-mongering going as a political tool.
A
CNN journalist pens a fascinating insight into the left's dystopian worldview. On April 7, Bill Weir, CNN's
Chief Climate Correspondent, had a son. Weir wrote an open letter to his son telling him that he was born into Hell on
Earth, also known as the modern Western world. The letter perfectly encapsulates everything the left hates and wants to
see destroyed. [...] Weir is a tragic figure because he has eyes but cannot see. The real tragedy, though, is that
people like Weir, through the power of the media, drive too much of America's political agenda.
Chris
Cuomo's coronavirus performance shows he is an insecure blowhard. On Monday [4/20/2020], CNN posted video of
pseudo-newsman Chris Cuomo "finally" emerging from self-quarantine in his Southampton basement — despite Cuomo
having been out and about in East Hampton just last week, getting into a fight with a "jackass loser fat-tire biker" who
dared to ask why an infected Cuomo was breaking quarantine. Without a face mask. "Who [...] are you?" Cuomo
replied. "I can do what I want." Yes: If we've learned anything about Chris Cuomo these past three weeks,
it's that he's an insecure, self-important, entitled blowhard who suffers in the shadow of his much more accomplished and
respected brother, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo.
The
Left Is an Existential Threat. The March 2020 issue of Fortune magazine focused on the "existential threat" to
the Earth posed by global warming, despite the fact that no significant global warming seems to be taking place. With
its appealing cover art — an image of the Earth tied up in a plastic trash bag — this issue is just
what I'd expect from a liberal outfit. It's typical of climate alarmists to begin by assuming their premise: warming
is an existential threat because, well, it is. And anyone who questions that premise is a criminal. Just what
is meant by "existential threat" is a bit vague.
Chuck
Todd Is Wrong (Again): There Are Huge Downsides To The Media Being Overly Alarmist. There are no costs
associated with being "overly alarmist" in the face of a global pandemic, "Meet the Press" host Chuck Todd claimed on
Sunday. His comment encapsulates the attitude of the media and other elites as they drive people and state and local
governments deeper into a panic that has resulted in the loss of tens of millions of jobs, the likely permanent closures of
hundreds of thousands of businesses, a general inability to pay rent and other monthly bills, a lack of treatment for
non-coronavirus health problems, the closure of churches and schools, the exacerbation of disparities by socio-economic
status in educational attainment, disruptions to the supply chain, and the destruction of trillions of dollars of American
wealth. [...] The problem is that the experts who are being listened to so carefully are solely focused on minimizing mal
effects from the coronavirus, all other considerations notwithstanding.
President
Trump needs to set the country free now. For weeks now, nearly every media outlet has behaved as though the
Covid19 virus was a cause for celebration. They broadcast the numbers like they show the stock market or election
returns. It is positively ghoulish. Even Fox News, which used to have more sense, has capitulated to the
hysteria; that network, too, is all in on manufacturing panic and fear. They are engaged in panic-mongering. They
are encouraging the wholesale destruction of the American economy. The worst are hoping and wishing for that
outcome. That is how much they are willing to sacrifice to see the president defeated. The American mainstream
media is the most dangerous enemy of America. There can no longer be any doubt about that fact. For
nearly four years, they have worked hand in hand with the Democrat party to do whatever harm it can to this country if it
will take Trump down and out.
Does
America need Journalists? Here's a free tip for the media: If you don't want to be accused of bursting
with glee over America's misfortune, it is generally helpful to not cheer America's misery while doing all in your power to
amplify and extend it. [...] Here are a few obvious suggestions. For one, a journalist's reporting on the current
crisis would show some sense of proportion and would weigh tradeoffs between protecting America's physical and economic
health, since they can't be uncoupled. In the long run, economic destruction if allowed to proceed unabated will do far
more damage than the virus can ever achieve. [...] What we have are the media that cried wolf, completely incapable of
informing when an actual crisis shows up since their faux outrage is always cranked to max power, even if indeed they wanted
to inform.
Trump's
not scaring people about the coronavirus: The media are. I understand critical reporting, but if anyone
is guilty of scaring the public, it's the national media. They have reported on this pandemic and the administration's
response to it as though it were something out of the Book of Revelations. Every single death is characterized as an
avoidable tragedy — something that we should have been able to stop if not for an inept president. In fact,
the experiences of many countries not led by Trump has been strikingly similar. The truth is that no one, not the
president, not scientists, and certainly not the media, has a firm grasp on what will happen with the coronavirus. So
far, we've identified trends in how it affects people, and we have some projections about how bad things will get, but that's
about it.
Trump's Kiplingesque
Coronavirus Leadership. [Scroll down] The yellow journalism storm hit hurricane strength when Fox's
Tucker Carlson told the Trump base that America would end unless the president came forward with a comprehensive national
plan. Even then, President Trump's next proposals were moderate. They mostly loosened government rules
restricting private medical responses and still emphasized federalism and decentralization. But in the face of the
media blizzard and Congress' belief that spending trillions was the only way to "do something," all Washington agreed on the
need to throw trillions of their borrowed money at the crisis and exert drastic new controls. The executive finally
accommodated to this panic. Even then, he expressed hope that extreme controls would last only for a limited time,
setting the restrictions for 15 days.
Fear
and Panic for A Purpose — The Coronavirus Evolves Into "The Blue Plague". The "Blue Plague" is an
intentional effort by various interests to create fear-porn amid the American population by intentionally hyping a mass
hysteria about the coronavirus. In many ways the Blue Plague is exponentially more dangerous than COVID-19
itself. Earlier today [3/26/2020], The New York Times became the epicenter of the Blue Plague by stating people in
hospitals throughout the city were dying, as desperately under-prepared and under-equipped doctors and nurses could not find
ventilators for thousands of arriving patients in a state of panic. This was/is incitement at its worst.
Explosion
of leftist hate aimed at Dr Birx after she demolishes media's panic narrative. Dr. Deborah L. Birx, the
response coordinator for the White House Coronavirus Task Force, has proven to be a voice of reason in a time of crisis —
much to the angst of the hostile, anti-Trump media. The hair-on-fire media is pushing a panic-inducing worst-case narrative
in the face of the COVID-19 outbreak, focusing on predictions of alarming increases in those who contract the Chinese virus while
reporting on dwindling hospital supplies and do-not-resuscitate orders allegedly being discussed to free up more beds. Yet,
Birx stands calmly before the American people at the nightly press briefings and reminds agenda-driven journalists of a
little thing called facts, beseeching them to be more responsible in their reporting. "There is no situation in the United
States right now that warrants that kind of discussion," she implored.
We
Should Start Mocking The Media More; Two Suggestions They'd Hate. The corporate political news media in America
is an absolute disgrace that deserves something far less respectful than criticism. They deserve mockery. If
you're paying attention and I don't blame you one bit if you're not, then you know that our nation just watched the corporate
media in America 1) create a national panic meant to inflict economic and social destruction that they could weaponize and
use against President Trump, and 2) further bolster that attempted domestic terrorism by siding with the Chinese Communist
Party's every lie and attack on our nation and the Trump administration. As if the last four years of being useful idiots
for Russia and doing everything they can to stoke division, distrust and discord in America weren't bad enough — the
corporate media in America, aka the swamp's marketing arm, are now actively trying to create economic and social carnage in
America while literally cheering on the Chinese Communist Party's attacks on our President and nation.
The Manchurian Media.
Last Thursday [3/12/2020], the Media Research Center assembled a video clip of the media melting down over Republicans
correctly noting the origin region of the coronavirus, screaming that it's rrrraaaaaccccccism and/or xenophobia to refer to
it as either "the Chinese Coronavirus" or "the Wuhan Virus" — along with 35 times the media referred to the virus
as "the Chinese Coronavirus" or "the Wuhan Virus." [...] I'm pretty sure that John Frankenheimer didn't intend for The
Manchurian Candidate to be a how-to guide. But if the media were paid Chinese agents, could they do more to harm
this country than they're already doing now?
A little
perspective helps. What's worse? The rapid spread of a novel virus which originated in China or the media
hysteria created and broadcast around the world? If it was the intent of the American media to create a state of fear
and panic, they've succeeded brilliantly. The dissemination of information pertinent to the virus has morphed into a
murky river of rumors, innuendo, outright lies and blather proffered by pundits who are neither doctors nor experts on much
of anything other than opinionating.
If It Bleeds,
It Leads: The Morbidity Of The News. New York Magazine ran an article in 1989 titled "Grins, Gore, and
Videotape — The Trouble with Local TV News" by journalist Eric Pooley. Pooley was angry about the quality of
the stories being published locally and the sheer volume of stories whose subject matter was grim and menacing. Pooley
said, "The thoughtful report is buried because sensational stories must launch the broadcast: If it bleeds, it leads."
The media in and of itself is a physical manifestation of our primal desires and fears, and they take great joy in using it
for their own political purposes. Most likely, the populace is the very cause of the demand. Ever notice the
number of rubbernecking motorists who slowdown in order to see something on the other side of a road or highway, often the
scene of a traffic accident. It's the same thing with this Covid-19 outbreak. If it bleeds, it leads, and they
are doing their best to panic America.
Here's
Why the Deep State and Wuhan Virus Are Like White on Rice. The Democrat-media complex and their Deep States
allies have elevated the Wuhan virus crisis to virtually a mass hysteria over the past couple of weeks. Their goal is
transparent, of course: to instill fear, to tank the economy, and to ascribe blame for everything on President Trump as a
means of setting the table to take him out in the November election since their impeachment farce (and other gambits) have
failed to get the job done beforehand. [...] This is precisely the reason why the Democrats and their lickspittle media are
weaponizing the Wuhan virus crisis. It is yet another overt attempt on their part to take out the president.
Compare their hysterical actions over the past few weeks to the virtual silence during the 2009 H1N1 swine flu epidemic.
Obama didn't even declare a national emergency until over 1,000 Americans had died of the disease, yet President Trump has
been repeatedly castigated for his supposedly "chaotic response" to the Wuhan virus.
'Trump's
Chernobyl': Media Wuhan Virus Hysteria Stokes Public Panic. Since the coronavirus came on the horizon, media
figures have been stoking panic, leading to mass shortages of basic health supplies, business travel cancellations, and
market drops, all while the confirmed disease number hiked yesterday [3/10/2020] to around 0.000002 percent of the U.S.
population. So far, U.S. cases of the basic seasonal flu outnumber coronavirus cases by a factor of 45,000 (using
federal stats for this year's flu and real-time tracking of coronavirus confirmations). The flu season has even been
especially bad this year, with between 20,000 and 52,000 deaths, compared to 29 so far from coronavirus. According to
infectious disease expert Dr. Paul Carson, who works for the North Dakota public health department, the flu appears to
be about five times more contagious than coronavirus, which means containment is possible, although especially for the
elderly coronavirus appears to have higher death rates.
Dr.
Drew Pinsky slams media for inciting coronavirus 'panic'. Celebrity physician Dr. Drew Pinsky said the
media is stoking the flames of coronavirus "panic" in the United States, and the industry should "be held accountable."
"What I have a problem with is the panic and the fact that businesses are getting destroyed, that people's lives are being
upended, not by the virus, but by the panic," Pinsky said in an interview with CBS last week. "The panic must
stop. And the press, they really somehow need to be held accountable because they are hurting people."
Coronavirus
By The Numbers. Big media is all about ratings, view, and clicks, hence their axiom, "If it bleeds, it leads."
A viral outbreak is the perfect story, on par with a missing Malaysian airliner or a celebrity football player named OJ on
trial for murder. The added bonus is that any negative news can be laid at the feet of a president loathed by the
media, who just so happens to be running for reelection. The media is in full campaign mode, trying desperately to drag
the carcass of one of their corpselike candidates across the presidential finish line. Stoking fear over quarantines
and supply chain disruptions have sent the stock market on a downward roller coaster ride. One of President Trump's
major achievements is the roaring economy. Taking the stock market down 25% or more may help the Democrats. [...] Look
also at past viral illnesses, far more lethal than coronavirus. The fatality rate for MERS and SARS was 34.4 and 9.5%
respectively. Neither illness generated as much media hysteria as coronavirus.
Can
the Coronavirus-Panic-Creating Media be Sued for Closed Businesses and Lost Jobs? The deliberate panic created
over the coronavirus is not victimless. Far from it. When the radioactive dust settles from this orchestrated
panic-strategy, potentially hundreds of billions will have been lost, thousands of businesses closed, and millions of
employees fired. When the coronavirus first reared its ugly head, many in the media instantly saw it as a cheap and
easy way to increase clicks, newspaper sales, viewers, listeners, and most especially Ad revenue. In the guise of
"informing the public," they intended to run scare headlines and stories to spike attention to their sites.
Latest
Climate Report Feeds into Alarmist Fearmongering. The latest National Climate Assessment, released just last
week, aims to plant yet another seed of climate catastrophism into the mind of the public. Predictably, its worst-case
scenarios got huge play in the media. After all, disaster sells. But the doomsday scenarios that animated talking
heads throughout the weekend aren't just highly unlikely; they're close to impossible.
The
Coronavirus Numbers Are Not Quite What They Seem. Dr. Anthony Fauci, the articulate, veteran director of
the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, described at the presser how the efforts to prevent the
spread — or "contain" the virus — would continue, but warned that we should expect the number of
coronavirus cases in the United States to increase. Fauci emphasized that the chance of becoming infected remains low
and that the majority of those who contract the virus — 75 to 80 percent — will experience it
like a "bad flu or a cold." The other 15 to 20 percent, he said, may need "advanced medical care." "For
the most part, the people who get in trouble and ultimately tragically would die from this are people who are elderly and or
have underlying conditions ... heart disease, chronic lung disease, diabetes, obesity," Fauci said. Some of the "if it
bleeds, it leads" media immediately jumped on the 15 to 20 percent figure, multiplied it by the entire U.S. population
of about 330 million, and concluded that we might need 50-60 million hospital beds, for which we are unprepared.
Think
Trump is 'outrageous?' He's nothing compared to these past presidents. Unprecedented, unprecedented.
Everything is unprecedented. Nothing like this has ever happened before. Except it pretty much has.
Whenever you see the word "unprecedented" in the media, you should ask yourself: Has this reporter ever read a history
book? Make the case against Trump if you want to, but if you pretend the sorts of things he does are without precedent,
you simply make yourself look ignorant.
How
Dumb Are America's College Students? It is an article of faith on the Left that college girls are raped at a
rate orders of magnitude above the national average. If that were true, not only would law enforcement be devoting much
of its resources to the college rape epidemic, but 18 year old girls and their parents would avoid our universities
and colleges like the plague. But, of course, that isn't happening. The whole thing is nonsense.
Media
Spread Gossipy Barr Resignation Rumor. "Sources" tell ABC News that "Attorney General Bill Barr told people
close to Trump Tuesday that he is considering resigning over the tweets." Right. Do any of these corporate media
outlets have any credibility? No, but it keeps the news cycle saturated with hysteria and occasions them a freak out on
their political snuff shows and Twitter. "News" of the Barr resignation was first reported by one the largest purveyors
of fake news and gossip: The Washington Post. Shortly after the resignation rumor was reported the DoJ shot
it down. "Addressing Beltway rumors: The Attorney General has no plans to resign," DOJ spokeswoman Kerri Kupec
tweeted. It would be absolutely tragic if Barr were to leave because Trump would never, ever be able to get a
good replacement.
Really
Bad Things the Media Is Ignoring Because of Impeachment. Have you heard that the president has been
impeached? Seriously, the trial is happening right now in the U.S. Senate. I'm kidding. Of course, you
can't escape the news because it's the only thing the "news" is talking about. We're in the middle of the most
choreographed foregone conclusion in history and the media is treating it like a whodunit.
Nets
Hype Alleged Trump Audio Only ABC Has Heard, Refuses to Air. Without providing any evidence, ABC News made
headlines on Friday when they claimed they had heard an audio recording of President Trump ordering the former U.S.
ambassador to Ukraine to be fired, something that would supposedly aid Democrats with impeachment. Both CBS News and
NBC News pounced on the reporting during their evening newscasts despite the fact ABC had not released the audio or commented
on its authenticity. For something that was supposedly a bombshell uncovered by his own network, World News
Tonight anchor David Muir sure kept his distance when he kicked off the program with the report.
Don't
buy the media hype over the new China virus. A CNN reporter broadcasts from Wuhan, China, on the recent viral
outbreak. There is nobody near who could possibly infect him — unless the cameraman has Guinness Book of
Records coughs and sneezes. So why does he insist on wearing a blue surgical mask while talking? It's called
"drama," which is badly needed, because there appears to be nothing very special about this outbreak of the 2019-nCoV or
Wuhan virus. It should actually be called the DvV, or Déjà vu Virus, because we have been through
these hysterias before. Over and over. Heterosexual AIDS, Ebola repeatedly, the H1N1 swine flu that was actually
vastly milder than the regular flu and, especially, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) in 2003. Once you start
debunking mass hysteria over outbreaks, it gets easy, because the same patterns repeat themselves.
Another
dud in the string of bombshells. [Scroll down] If it takes exhaustive and complicated explanations to pinpoint
precisely why something is a "bombshell," then it is not a "bombshell." That is the point of a "bombshell." It is so
powerful that it does not need to come wrapped in complicated explanations. But there is no rabbit hole these people will not
venture down in pursuit of President Trump. There is no zany conspiracy theory they will not gulp down to keep the party
going. And there is no arcane strip of federal code from centuries gone by that they won't dust off to construct their
rickety case for impeachment.
Greg
Gutfeld Loses It Over the Pomp and Circumstance of Impeachment. [Scroll down] ["]We know this was
an emotional tantrum directed at daddy who won the election, and they're mad at daddy. So we have to go through this
phony procession. Ooh, let's show pictures of the cloak room! Ooh, let's watch them walk down the halls!
Ooh, this is breaking news!["]
The
Fantasy War That Never Was. Over the past few weeks, the media have been singing in 100-part harmony that
America is headed to war. From Fox News and CNN, to MSNBC and the New York Times, media magpies have been proclaiming
that America is going to war with Iran, thanks to the rube-in-chief who has no idea what he is doing. The New York
Times declares the U.S. and Iran are, "At the edge of war." The Wall Street Journal at least asks, "Will the U.S. and
Iran blunder into war?" [...] We have been at war with Iran for 40 years, since the Georgia peanut farmer thought the
semi-thuggish Shah of Iran was a bad guy, and a religious fanatic would be a better choice to lead the country.
CNN's
Brian Stelter Does Deep-Dive Data Analysis on Trump's Twitter Typos. CNN's Brian Stelter used up
three-and-a-half minutes of his basement-rated Sunday show to blow the lid off of President Trump's Twitter typos.
Well, two things we can all spell is "3.6 percent unemployment" and "a 40 percent decline in viewers."
When
did routine bad weather become such big news? Bad weather on Thanksgiving week can be stressful in the best of
circumstances. But this week's outbreak of TV weather hysteria was a sight to behold. For days on end, even Trump
news was booted from the top of the network evening newscasts by dire warnings of the "triple storm danger" heading across
the country and the "holiday travel nightmare" likely to result. The reports hit all the usual TV-weather bases: shots
of skidding cars and chugging snowplows; airport scenes of passengers stranded by flight delays; Al Roker bounding among the
weather maps as though he were plotting a military operation. And, as always, the alarming statistics: 21 million
people under winter-weather alerts; 97 million vulnerable to high winds; "2,000 miles' worth of winter-storm watches,
advisories and warnings," stretching from California to the upper Midwest.
The Editor says...
On the other hand, very cold weather at Thanksgiving, including snow in southern California, is newsworthy because it's a little early
in the year for all this snow. What happened to "global warming?"
Everything
You Hear About Billion-Dollar Disasters Is Wrong. The U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA) counts the number of disasters in the United States that result in losses of greater than $1 billion, starting in
1980. Over the past three decades that count has shown a sharp increase, from five or less such disasters each year in the
decade of the 1980s to ten or more in each of the past 4 years. That increase must be due to climate change, right?
Actually, no. The billion-dollar disaster tally is easy to understand, simple to communicate, but —
regrettably — incredibly misleading and just plain bad economics.
CBS
Anchor Advertises Televised Impeachment Hearings Like Fight Entertainment. By her excitement and choice of
words, one could easily think failing CBS Evening News anchor Norah O'Donnell was promoting a pay-per-view boxing or
pro-wrestling match during Wednesday's [11/6/2019] newscast. But no, she was hyping the televised impeachment hearings
that would start next week. In addition to that, NBC Nightly News chided Republicans were wanted the public to
know the identity of the infamous anti-Trump whistleblower who helped to start the investigation. "Tonight, lights,
cameras, testimony. The stage is set for the first televised hearings of the impeachment inquiry," O'Donnell excitedly
proclaimed during the program's opening tease. "We now know when they will happen and who may be the Democrats' star
witness." Once they were finished with the teases, O'Donnell could barely contain her glee as she sprinted to call them
"historic," adding, "televised impeachment hearings begin a week from today, and it promises to be must-see TV." [...] She
was acting more like a fight promoter for a UFC match than a journalist. S
Democrats may come
to regret choosing impeachment over independents. Ukraine. Doral. Impeachment. Syria.
Schiff and Pelosi. Hunter and Joe. Trump and Trump. Impeachment. Secret hearings and secret Russian
"assets." Impeachment. The media can't get enough of it. Most people have had enough already.
Local California
CBS reporter fired after jumping on, damaging cars during live news segment. A local CBS reporter in California
was apparently fired after he — during a live news segment — climbed atop classic, privately-owned
cars, even seemingly damaging one of them in the process. Angel Cardenas, a correspondent with KMAX-TV's "Good Morning
Sacramento," was on air Sunday at the Sacramento International Auto Show, a weekend-long event at Cal Expo that was about to
begin its final day. Someone who caught the segment on air, Adam Copeland, posted a clip of it to Facebook, as he has
"never seen such a disregard to someone else's vehicle."
The Editor says...
I've seen several so-called reporters over the years who played the role of out-of-control daredevil/buffoon on the Big Morning
Show. This is the reporter who is the first to ride a new roller coaster at Six Flags, or the one who goes bungee jumping
on live TV, or goes rappelling down the side of a building. (In larger TV markets, the Happy Team of Steve Serious and Suzie
Plastique "anchor" the Big Morning Show, but after the first ten minutes, they've run out of news. At that point they may
have to resort to pie-in-the-face slapstick to retain viewers.) At times, you may hear Steve and Suzie, back in the
studio, gasp in phony astonishment at the risks being taken out in the field. And then, after no more than three minutes,
the buffoon in the field will wrap it up. This is all done for the purpose of grabbing the audience's attention through
whatever means necessary, much like a two-year-old screaming in a restaurant. In this case, the buffoon/jackass thought
he could get away with anything, and found out otherwise.
How
the American Media Perpetuates and Profits from Mass Shootings. The American media currently has no industry
standard practices for how to cover either suicides or mass shootings. However, one can easily see the difference
between how mass shootings and suicides are covered. Whereas suicides are treated as sombre tragedies, mass shootings
often have the sensationalism turned up to 11. There's a detailed discussion of the shooter's life story, motives and
methods. Strong evidence suggests that this both encourages and instructs potential mass shooters. Statistically
speaking, mass shootings represent a tiny portion of all deaths in the United States. [...] Despite the low frequency of
these tragedies, the media pays outsized attention to them for self-serving reasons, which are both political and economic:
There's a demonstrated anti-gun agenda amongst America's media. And there's the ongoing shift in the media's business
model to attention-based revenue that results in ever-more sensational news coverage and "clickbait" headlines.
Anti-Trump
Psychodrama 10.0? What do the Kavanaugh hearings, Jussie Smollett, the Covington kids, the Mueller investigation, and
now the Trump phone call all have in common? Staged melodrama, media collusion hysteria, progressive demands that justice be
served immediately, promises of walls-are-closing-in blockbuster revelations from new witnesses, supposed surprise revelatory
documents, fusions between Democratic politicians and Washington bureaucrats — and then bust, nada, and teeth-gnashing
as the truth catches up to various rumor-mongers.
Disappointing
State Department IG Meeting Deflates U.S. Media. For two days the mainstream media were breathlessly reporting
on an "urgent request" from the State Department Inspector General for a closed-door meeting. Media sources whipped
their left-wing audiences into an anticipatory frenzy with predictions of devastating information soon to come from an
"explosive" and "highly unusual" request. It must must be connected to President Trump and Secretary Mike Pompeo hiding
devastating information, they said... Well, the super-anticipated 'closed door' briefing was held today, and the IG handed
out packets of information related to revelations of Democrats colluding with the Ukraine government. The exact
opposite of what the media and the professional left anticipated.
They
Demand Our Respect, Yet Treat Us Like Fools. Six months ago I wrote about the liberal media masquerading as
journalists to scam the American people down a rabbit hole with their contrived high noon drama-filled fake news scandals.
[...] Unfortunately, we are still bored with these manufactured scandals. These snake-oil salesmen Washington
"insiders" have not figured us out yet. But we've figured them out. They are desperados who cannot survive
without their 'sky is falling' narratives. As pathetic as these high-brow so-called intellectuals are, they are simply
people who stayed in Washington long enough to drink the Potomac Kool-Aid, catch the fever, and delusively believe the
universe centers on them — that all of America is riveted to their televisions and newspapers yearning to hear
what these chatterboxes have to say.
California
ramps up efforts to combat invasive swamp rodents. The swamp rodents, called nutria, are setting off alarms in
California. They weigh about 20 pounds (9 kilograms) each and eat the equivalent of about a fourth of their
weight each day by burrowing into riverbanks and chomping into plants that emerge from the water.
The Editor says...
Nothing new here. They've been around Houston for decades.
Network
Morning Shows Hype Trump Impeachment 17 Times [in One Day]. On Monday [9/23/2019], the network morning shows
managed to feature some variant of the word "impeachment" a total of 17 times while reporting on President Trump's phone call
with the President of Ukraine about corruption allegations against Joe Biden's son Hunter. In addition, ABC, NBC and
CBS eagerly touted a letter from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi accusing Trump of "lawlessness."
White
House Press Secretary Says Daily Briefings On Hold Because Grandstanding Reporters Trying To 'Get Famous'.
During [George W. Bush]'s time in office, the White House press secretary held a briefing nearly every day. Reporters
crammed into the smaller-than-it-looks Brady Briefing Room and badgered the secretary with questions, usually for about an
hour. Some in the first row, usually employed by a TV network, would drone on and on, holding court, asking questions
that sometime ran for two minutes (air time, don't you know). And some, like NBC's David Gregory, would ask five, six,
seven questions, often as his colleagues behind him moaned. Barack Obama held fewer daily briefings, and under President
Trump, they barely ever happen.
Yellow
Journalism to Fake News: Media lies against Justice Kavanaugh. [Scroll down] The stories were
frequently alarming, nudging readers toward hysteria and, as the case usually was, largely fiction. Today its lineage
has continued to other gold medal aspirants: The Washington Post, MSNBC, CNN, and others. [...] But the gold medal
remains in the hands of the so-called Gray Lady: The New York Times. Frank Luther Mott identifies yellow
journalism based on five characteristics: • Scare headlines in huge print, often of minor news
• Lavish use of pictures, or imaginary drawings • Use of faked interviews,
misleading headlines, pseudoscience, and a parade of false learning from so-called experts • Emphasis
on full-color Sunday supplements, usually with comic strips • Dramatic sympathy with the "underdog"
against the system. Yellow journalism has had its day reaching its pinnacle during the early 20th century.
Good News.
I rarely watch cable news anymore. It's all hysteria, all the time. CNN: "We are destroying the planet."
MSNBC: "The middle class is disappearing!" President Donald Trump says drug trafficking "is worse than ever!" I'm
glad my favorite magazine, Reason, cuts through the gloom and tells us the truth: There is less war and more food.
We live healthier and longer lives. [...] It's a surprising message, since most journalists tell us everything's terrible.
There's
A Good Reason People Hate The Media. On Tuesday morning [9/10/2019], the liberal media was in a
tizzy — National Security Advisor John Bolton had been fired or resigned. It didn't matter which, there was
a "shake up" in the Trump administration and these Democrats with press passes were ready to pounce. [...] The American
people aren't watching, they aren't interested. Who cares if Bolton was fired or resigned? That he's gone now is
all that matters, and that only matters to a very few. The opening left by Bolton will be filled by someone else, and
life will continue. By next week, fewer people will remember this than care about it now. The Bolton exit is the
latest "STOP THE PRESSES" moment from an opposition media desperate to find something, anything with which to damage
President Trump.
CNBC's
Jim Cramer: 'The Only People Talking About a Recession Are Us'. Have you noticed all the talk recently by the
mainstream media about a recession? Of course, many members of the MSM can barely contain their glee at the prospect of
an economic downturn hurting President Trump's prospects in the election next year. Well, Jim Cramer on Thursday's
[9/5/2019] Squawk Box told host Joe Kernen that the only people talking about such a recession are "us," meaning
members of the media.
Media
Meltdown over Trump's Hurricane Predictions. The Trump-hating media has been suffering from post-traumatic
stress disorder since November 2016, relapsing into insanity after each Trump tweet. The latest trigger is Trump's
tweet about the potential course of Hurricane Dorian. [...] It's a typical Trump tweet with presidential well wishes ahead of
a massive potential hurricane. It took only one word to send the media into a psychotic state. That word was
Alabama, one of several states that could have been affected by the hurricane. CNN, blissfully unconcerned that Joe
Biden often doesn't know where he is or who he was vice-president for, was outraged that Trump is "spreading false
information during an emergency situation". This is even more of a national crisis to CNN than when they learned
that the President gets two scoops of ice cream.
Is
It True That 'Getting Killed by Police Is a Leading Cause of Death for Young Black Men,' as the LA Times Claims?
As is the intent, the headline is an attention-grabber. [...] Most readers of course will not delve beyond the headline, but
even those who do will not encounter anything resembling journalism as it was once practiced. Rather, they'll find more
than 1,400 words devoted to the racial-grievance agenda that drives so much of what appears in the Los Angeles Times.
And worse, not only is journalism itself perverted with the story, but so is science, for the story is presented as such on
the page and was written by Amina Khan, who is billed on the paper's website as a "science writer." So, if you dare to
quibble with any of the story's details, or heaven forbid question its very premise, it makes you a "denier," one to be cast
out into the darkness with climate-change skeptics, believers in sex differences, and all the other benighted deplorables who
are so sneered upon among our sophisticated betters in the media.
How
The Media Enables Destructive Climate Change Hysteria. At a 2005 London conference of "concerned climate
scientists and politicians" that helped launch contemporary climate rhetoric, attendees warned that the world had as little
as 10 years before the Earth reached "the point of no return on global warming." Humans, they claimed, would soon be
grappling with "widespread agricultural failure," "major droughts," "increased disease," "the death of forests," and the
"switching-off of the North Atlantic Gulf Stream," among many other calamities. Since then, the Earth has gotten
greener. This year, for the first time since we began logging data in 2000, there were no "extreme" or "exceptional"
droughts across the contiguous United States — although we've come close to zero on numerous occasions over the
past decade. Every time there's a drought anywhere in the world, climate change will be blamed. But world crop
yields continue to ensure that fewer people are hungry than ever.
NASA
map shows Africa has more fires burning than Brazil. The dust up with France's Macron and the President of
Brazil's Jair Bolsonaro regarding the fires burning in the Amazon left out one small detail. Africa is on fire as
well. NASA maps show that there are more fires in the African region than in the Amazon. The on again off again
acceptance of money to fight the Amazon fire lost sight that we have fires everywhere. The G-7 Summit raised $20 Million
to assist in putting out the fires in Brazil. No doubt more proof that humans are just too destructive to the "lungs"
of earth. Another detail never mentioned is that long before planes and humans, fires raged across the planet. It
was nature's way of regeneration. Old growth was removed and new growth lead to food sources for animals and birds.
Don't
Panic: Amazon Burning Is Mostly Farms, Not Forests. "Amazon rainforest is burning at an unprecedented
rate," declares CNN. The Daily Beast gives us "Record Number of Wildfires Burning in Amazon Rainforest." Here's NBC
News: "Amazon wildfires could be 'game over' for climate change fight." Interestingly, when NASA released the
satellite image on August 21, it noted that "it is not unusual to see fires in Brazil at this time of year due to high
temperatures and low humidity. Time will tell if this year is a record breaking or just within normal limits." So
why are there so many fires? "Natural fires in the Amazon are rare, and the majority of these fires were set by farmers
preparing Amazon-adjacent farmland for next year's crops and pasture," soberly explains The New York Times. "Much of
the land that is burning was not old-growth rain forest, but land that had already been cleared of trees and set for
agricultural use." It is routine for farmers and ranchers in tropical areas burn their fields to control pests and
weeds and to encourage new growth in pastures.
Yes,
Immigrants Should Be Less Dependent On U.S. Welfare, And So Should Everyone Else. The Trump administration
announced long-awaited "public charge" immigration regulations this week, and the furor immediately kicked up to derangement
level. Reason's Shikha Dalmia called the policy a "complete abuse of the original understanding" of the law. In
the Washington Post, opinion writer Paul Waldman said the policy sends a message: "We hate you and we don't want you
here, and if you come we will treat you with all the cruelty we can muster." CNN's legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin went so far
as to call the proposed regulation "un-American." There is very little nuance left in political discourse. Every
administration policy is said to be the key to saving America or the final step in dooming it, depending on your point of view.
(Anti-)Social
Media Inciting Hatred. Twitter artificially increases circulation of the most divisive and polarizing topics by
making them Trending. It directly benefits from inflaming conflicts through increased user engagement, translating
into higher ad revenues. It indirectly benefits from such conduct because lib jornos, MSM, and other agitators enjoy such
conflicts and promote Twitter to further the contention. Twitter was praised for fueling the Ferguson riots in 2014.
Facebook apparently so envied Twitter that it hired left leaning reporters to manipulate its own Trending section.
Press
exploits the kids of illegals hauled off in immigration raid. The press is having a field day exploiting
children to attack President Trump and his effort to re-establish rule of law in immigration. Tossing all previous
compunction about showing a child's face on national television out the window, they put the cameras right in a little girl's
face to get her to talk and cry about a recent immigration raid in Mississippi. No blue dot for her over this little
girl's face, they went full frontal instead, as if a child that young were capable of giving consent. Now the video
will follow the girl all her life, and will likely end up a topic for mocking memes, something no 11 year-old deserves.
Not a problem for the big-buck press, though, such as CBS, which in fact, does this a lot.
Red
Flags and White Supremacists. For the past two years, the left's 'go to' words were "Russia," "Mueller," and
"collusion." Mueller's investigation and report were a big swing and a miss and not surprisingly these words have quickly
been erased from the vocabularies of cable news anchors and their panels. On a dime, coincident with a handful of mass
shootings, the left's new favorite words are "racist" and "white supremacist."
The Media's Disgusting Bloodlust.
If you pay serious attention to network and cable commentators after a mass shooting, you will see something nearly as
alarming as the atrocities themselves. Set aside, for a moment, the horror of the event about which they are holding
forth and it will become obvious that their solemn expressions are well-rehearsed affectations that mask a morbid glee.
As you lament truncated lives and traumatized survivors, these creatures count eyeballs and clicks. While you worry
about the health of our society, they search for a connection to some conservative cause or politician. And the print
media are just as ghoulish.
The
Media Crossed a Line This Week and There's No Going Back. [Scroll down] It really does feel like we are
coming apart at the seams, with near majorities of the country being accused of "white supremacy" by some major figures
simply for supporting a politician. Driving the division, broad brushing, and hatred this week had been the liberal
media. Whether it's newspapers amplifying the disgusting rhetoric of people like Beto O'Rourke and Elizabeth Warren or
the constant stream of divisive, racially tinged editorials that are being pushed out, there's no question of their
role. The cable news beat has been even worse, with one MSNBC host actually saying that Donald Trump wants there to be
mass shootings while another threatened business owners as complicit in white supremacy who donate to the GOP.
CNN
roasted over debate production, format: 'A disservice to serious people'. CNN faced backlash for its first
primary debate of the 2020 campaign season, with members of the media comparing its production to a sporting event or movie
trailer and others lamenting the time spent to kick off the event. Journalists noted that the event started on Tuesday
night [7/30/2019] at 8 p.m. with an introduction video, a commercial break and opening statements. The first question
to one of the ten candidates was not asked until 8:23 p.m., however.
The
latest pathetic chapter in CNN's quest to 'prove' Trump is a racist. As LU's Howard Portnoy noted yesterday [7/21/2019],
the first of what are likely to be a rash of stories in which "a person of color claims that he was told by a person of pallor to go
back where he came from" occurred over the weekend. The alleged victim, who has since walked back her accusation, is a black
Georgia state lawmaker named Erica Thomas, whose title instantly catapulted the story to national news status. The alleged
perpetrator is a white man who was standing behind her in a grocery checkout line. Enter CNN, which is never slow to jump on
liberal bandwagons. The network posted an "open casting call" to its Facebook page asking "immigrants" who have been
victimized by Donald Trump or his policies to come forward and share their stories.
The Editor says...
The story turned out to be a fake hate crime.
Media
cried wolf: Calling every Republican a racist lost its bite. Once upon a time in the world of cable news,
a guest or host or anchor calling anyone a racist would have considerable impact. From what we've seen this week, when
it comes to that word, those days are long gone. A person simply can't turn on the news or scroll Twitterfor even more
than a minute before hearing the word "racist" or "racism." For example, CNN and MSNBC said the word "racist" more than
1,100 times from Sunday to Tuesday, according to a tally conducted by Grabien Media, an online media production and news
prep service. The count, which doesn't include on-screen graphics commonly known as chyrons, [...]
The excerpt below appears to have been extracted from Closed Captioning. Joe Concha: According to Grabien
Media, Since Sunday, Word 'Racist' [has been] Said on CNN, MSNBC More than 2,200 Times. There is an actual
number around this that since Sunday [7/14/2019] according to gradient [sic] media, the word racist has been said on CNN and
MSNBC alone, more than 2200 times. I don't even know if that is physically or magnetically possible, but that is what
has been happening this weekend the myopic focus completely. [Video clip]
Greg
Gutfeld Mocks CNN, MSNBC for 1,100 Uses of 'Racist' in Two Days on Trump. On Tuesday night's episode of The
Five, Fox News pundit Greg Gutfeld mocking the collective mass hysteria of CNN and MSNBC over President Trump's latest
tweets against radical first-term Congresswomen. Gutfeld summarized the hysterics to a T with a simple word
count: "We are reaching peak racism right now. CNN and MSNBC, according to The Hill this morning, had said the
word racist 1,100 times. That was this morning [7/16/2019] since Sunday [7/14/2019]. Ok, so today's Tuesday... I
think when it's 1,100 times by Tuesday afternoon, I'd call that maybe an overreaction. It's hysterical and it's hysteria."
Media
coverage of Hurricane Barry was the real disaster. There will be no media awards for Al Roker or the Washington
Post in recognition of their coverage of Hurricane Barry. At least if the people living in New Orleans have a say in
the matter. The weekend weather event, fortunately, was nowhere nearly as bad as was predicted in some media
accounts. That's a good thing. The bad thing, though, is the over-hyped media coverage of Tropical Storm Barry
that briefly became Hurricane Barry (a Category 1 storm) before it returned to being a tropical storm. Barry made
landfall Saturday at Intracoastal City, about 160 miles west of New Orleans. Unfortunately, to read or listen to media
coverage, you would have heard calls for mass evacuation in New Orleans, well outside of where the storm hit. The word
"evacuation" has its own connotations for residents on the Gulf Coast and it is not a word to be used lightly. For a
television weather forecaster to suggest such an action when the local authorities are not calling for it, the situation can
turn unnecessarily dangerous.
Power
Outage in New York — Dramatic Media — Rest of Country 'Meh'. Fox News talking hair Leland
Vitter uses his best dramatic voice, channels his inner Shep, and proclaims the end of the known universe is nigh, because
the power went out in a part of Manhattan, New York City.
Could
I have some news with my emotions, please? Emotion now blankets the media landscape like an infant's crib at
bedtime. Google "Shepard Smith emotional," and up come nearly 3 million results, many of them focused on the Fox
anchor's recent visceral response to immigrant suffering. A search of "Rachel Maddow crying" delivers more than 1
million offerings, many for the MSNBC host's reaction to border detentions and the Mueller report. "Brooke Baldwin
tears" uncovers nearly 2 million entries for the CNN reporter's reaction to a variety of news events. They are not
alone. Contemporary culture trusts feelings over facts, rewards heated emotion — tears or anger —
and rejects medium cool. The effect on journalism is unmistakable. And a lot of the blame can be placed on those
all-too-common twin devils: television and the internet.
Debunked:
The absurd story about smartphones causing kids to sprout horns. The Washington Post on Thursday [6/20/2019]
published a story suggesting that the use of mobile devices is causing young people to sprout horns from their skulls.
But a look at the scientific data behind the story finds that such a splashy takeaway is tenuous at best — and
atrocious reporting at worst. The Post's story was primarily based on a study published back in February 2018 by two
Australian researchers. It earned fresh attention last week after being mentioned in a BBC feature on how modern life
is supposedly transforming the human skeleton. The study was published in Nature's open source journal Scientific
Reports, which is supposedly peer-reviewed. But the study has significant limitations and flaws, and the Post breezed
over them for a sensationalized story.
No,
Teen Vogue, you should not promote prostitution as a career choice. The Internet is a crazy place, made crazier
with a desire from many platforms to be shocking just to get readership. Clickbait headlines and outrageous, negative
stories complete with aggressive phrases like "owned" and "called out" litter websites and their corresponding social media
accounts, which all do their best to out-shock each other to capture readers' limited attention. While this insanity is
definitely detrimental to our health as a society, it deserves even more scrutiny when directed at children.
Arsenic
found in bottled water sold at Whole Foods, Walmart, Target. When you pay premium prices, you expect a premium
product — but that's not necessarily the case with bottled water. California nonprofit Center for
Environmental Health has revealed that water bottle brands Peñafiel, owned by Keurig Dr. Pepper, and Starkey, owned
by Whole Foods, contain levels of highly toxic arsenic that are above the legal limit. [...] Other symptoms of arsenic
poisoning include stomach pain and nausea, vomiting and diarrhea, numbness, even paralysis or blindness.
The Editor says...
This is nothing but alarmism, brought to you by an environmental activist group and gladly passed along by the New York Post.
There's not enough arsenic in bottled water to give anyone arsenic poisoning. The "legal limit" for arsenic content
in bottled water is probably so low that it's easy to exceed that limit.
No,
Your Kid Isn't Growing Horns Because Of Cellphone Use. This week, the Washington Post grabbed plenty of
attention for a story that claimed that kids are actually growing "horns" because of cell phone use. The story, which
leans on 2016 and 2018 research out of Australia, was cribbing off of [a] more nuanced piece by the BBC on how skeletal
adaptation to modern living changes are kind of a thing. The Post's more inflammatory take was accompanied by a wide
variety of other stories proclaiming that today's children are growing horns and bone spurs because they use their [...]
cellphones too much!
ABC's
'08 Prediction: NYC Under Water from Climate Change By June 2015. New York City underwater? Gas
over $9 a gallon? A carton of milk costs almost $13? Remember when that happened on June 12, 2015? No? This
was the wildly-inaccurate world of 2015 predicted by ABC News 11 years ago this week. Appearing on Good Morning
America in 2008, Bob Woodruff hyped Earth 2100, a special that pushed apocalyptic predictions of the then-futuristic
2015. The segment included supposedly prophetic videos, such as a teenager declaring, "It's June 8th, 2015. One
carton of milk is $12.99." (On the actual June 8, 2015, a gallon of milk cost, on average, $3.39.) Another clip
featured this prediction for 2015 "Gas reached over $9 a gallon." (In reality, gas cost an average of $2.75 four years ago.)
Paper
to staff: Use 'climate crisis' ... 'change' is 'too gentle'. Staff at the Guardian newspaper of
London, England, has been directed to address "global warming" more aggressively and use "climate crisis" or "climate
emergency" instead of "climate change," which it considers "too passive and gentle."
The Media Press Dems
for Impeachment Porn. [This article examines] the motivation of the media as they continue to peddle
impeachment. They know it would be political suicide for the Democrats because only a minority of voters supports
removing the President, yet they crave the countless clicks and eyeballs the circus would inevitably produce. But the
Democratic leadership, their antipathy for the President notwithstanding, is loath to take the leap just to provide
impeachment porn for the media.
Climate
change scare stories reach the point of psychological terrorism. The corporate media cartels have become hubs
of hatred and "journo-terrorism" that targets the psyche of the masses. The quack science hoax of so-called "climate
change" is used to terrorize the public into believing that their planet will somehow be destroyed by carbon dioxide —
the very molecule that has been rapidly re-greening the Earth over the past four decades, according to NASA. Now, a new
round of "science" has been studying the mental stress of the victims of this psychological terrorism pushed by the dishonest
media, and they've reached an even more bizarre conclusion. Scientists now claim that climate change is causing "mental
anguish" among humans. Seriously. Of course, the real source of the mental anguish is the lies and panic propaganda
of the corporate media and the pathetic scientific establishment which has figured out that if you want more government grant
money, you have to conduct "research" that identifies some new crisis to be blamed on climate change. In fact, the very
phrase "climate change" isn't scary enough yet to achieve the desired goal of mass mental terrorism, so media outlets around
the world are now ordering their obedient writers to start using the phrase "climate crisis."
The
hoax and due diligence. Nothing illustrates the decline of serious journalism more than the fact that many of
the major media, particularly CNN and MSNBC, have participated (and to some extent continue to participate) in massive hoaxes
which would have been easily disproved with basic due diligence. The first and least important hoax was that of Michael
Avenatti. He appeared on CNN and MSNBC more than 100 times where he was touted as an expert on many things,
particularly the alleged misdeeds of President Trump. Fawning hosts on these networks even referred to him as
presidential material — yet he was nothing more than a conman. He now faces about 400 years in prison
if he is convicted on the many charges in several different courts.
Jussie
Smollett [is] just a symptom of the fake outrage disease. Remember folk expressions about the wisdom of being careful?
"Look before you leap." "Measure twice, cut once." "Don't go off half-cocked." All of this should go double for
online culture. Instead lives are being destroyed over misleading, unfair or just plain false accusations. People are
being turned into public enemies or even fired after being framed for racism, homophobia or other perceived social crimes.
Others are casting themselves as victims of hate in order to line their pockets. These days anyone with a phone in his hand
can be P.T. Barnum. And people who congratulate themselves for being unusually tolerant, kind-hearted and impervious to
misinformation are the leaders of frenzied online mobs who are pitchforking innocent people. Fake news is bad enough.
Fake outrage is even worse.
Climate hysteria. The UK Guardian
Newspaper decided that you're not sufficiently alarmed about climate doom. Climate change is no longer the term of
choice with the Guardian and other news outlets. Get ready to hear the newly invented terms, "climate emergency,"
"climate crisis," "climate breakdown," and "global heating." By the way, when did it become the job of a news organization
to hype public concern over an issue instead of just reporting the facts?
Will
the Media Ever Pay a Price For Its Irresponsibility? [Michael] Avenatti was entirely the creation of the media,
right down to the idea, which CNN and MSNBC took seriously, that he could be a presidential candidate in 2020. It is
emerging now that the media knew first hand that Avenatti is a first class jerk, from the outrageous and rude way he treated
the low- and mid-level media people (producers, etc) he dealt with in his nonstop media campaign. But because he was
saying what the media wanted to hear (Trump is a horrible human being), the media were willing overlook all of the slime this
reptile was leaving in media green rooms and on TV sets.
Democrats
Claim 'Constitutional Crisis,' Media Repeat It 386 Times. Evidently Democrats need only utter the words
"constitutional crisis" for the media to report it as fact. Watch cable "news" these days, and you'll surely see
talking heads parroting the Democratic line that the Trump administration's noncompliance with House Committee subpoenas
amounts to a constitutional crisis. While a small handful of analysts and guest legal scholars disagree, TV hosts
continue to push the idea uncritically, with some even urging the alleged crisis be used as grounds for impeachment.
MRC analysts looked at all coverage on broadcast (ABC, CBS, NBC) and liberal cable (CNN, MSNBC) networks from May 8 to 12,
finding 386 utterances of the term "constitutional crisis" by hosts, analysts, or guest journalists. This count did not
include cases in which the term was used by political partisans, such as members of Congress, former administration officials,
or Democratic and Republican strategists.
Children
Have to Listen to Fake News, Too, and It's Not Good for Them. [Scroll down] Kids are being propagandized about the ticking climate
clock in school, on TV, and everywhere on social media. It just doesn't help when the parents are scared, too. A 40-year-old
Salt Lake City mother said the release of the U.N.'s latest climate report caused her three teenage daughters a severe emotional crisis.
"There was a lot of crying. They told me, 'We know what's coming, and it's going to be really rough.'" Because mom believes
it, too, there's not much help she can offer. "I want to have hope," she said, "but the reports are showing that this isn't going to
stop, so all we can do is cope." I don't believe that these children are really studying climate reports; it's the media's hysterical
coverage that's upsetting them.
CNN's
Jim Acosta Makes A Fool Of Himself At The WH Medal Of Freedom Ceremony. CNN's Jim Acosta is in a running gun
battle with April Ryan for the worst White House reporter currently on the beat. Acosta's self-aggrandizement and
constant editorializing in briefings have become the butt of jokes everywhere. His false sense of grandeur has led him
to write a book proclaiming how dangerous it is to "tell the truth" in America. Because Acosta's life is so harrowing.
Scarborough:
'History Has Chosen' the Dem Party to 'Stand Up and Defend the Rule of Law'. As President Donald Trump
continues to spar with House Democrats over subpoenas, MSNBC "Morning Joe" host Joe Scarborough applauded Democrats, saying
that "history has chosen" their party to "stand up and defend the rule of law" in America. Scarborough said that as a
former Republican, it makes him "sad" to see the GOP "breaking the law." "You can look at all of the document requests
that they've ignored," Scarborough outlined. "They're in contempt of Congress."
What did she say that isn't absolutely true?
What strange personification: Does History take a vote, or what does it take to make up History's mind?
Parts
of the American Media Are Willfully Twisting News to Stoke Racial Tension. President Trump is cheering on
someone who has not only supported the President, but withstood an online campaign of harassment for doing so. The
media would prefer to make this a race issue and fan the flames of racial tension. It is unfortunate.
CBS
Incites Violence Against Political Opponents. "It's time to punch a few Nazis." It's hard to shock me, but
I was shocked by the trailer for CBS's "The Good Fight." [...] Promoting violence in the abstract is not illegal.
According to the Supreme Court case Brandenburg v. Ohio, speech is legal unless it "is directed to inciting
or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action." The trailer showed an unprovoked
assault against a real person. It told viewers it is time to punch Nazis. If this isn't a call to violence —
at least against Richard Spencer — what is? If the show had named almost anyone else, there would surely be
criminal charges. While we are to attack "neo-Nazis," communists or non-white extremists are apparently off limits.
Mainstream
Media's Worshipping of Michael Avenatti. Remember celebrity lawyer Michael Avenatti, the man who represented
porn star Stormy Daniels? Well, the media's favorite guest is back in the news after being indicted on 36 charges
Thursday [4/11/2019]. Two hundred fifty-four — that's how many times Avenatti was featured on major TV
networks in one year, according to NewsBusters. CNN alone featured Avenatti a staggering 121 times. Now he has
been charged with numerous crimes, including tax evasion, fraud, and stealing money from clients — including
scamming a paraplegic man out of a $4 million settlement.
Media
exaggerate impact of US-Mexico border closure. Let's hope that President Trump's "one-year warning" issued to
Mexico Thursday to halt the flood of illegal drugs and migrants entering the U.S. — or face a border closure and
new tariffs — will influence Mexico to make some real changes. Unfortunately, the media's continual
exaggerations of the dangers of closing the border may give Mexico the idea that the U.S. lacks the willpower to carry
through on the president's threat. If Mexican leaders conclude Trump is bluffing, there will be little reason for them
to change their behavior.
Media
ignore border debacle to feed us avocado stories. Here at the Mexican border in San Diego, the local television
press is always looking for ways to Get Trump. The illegal immigrant sob stories aren't working all that much
anymore. So now they're reporting on President Trump's threatened border shutdown over it as a matter of the price of
avocados in San Diego. [...] Obviously, the intent is to create a unified voice to whip up opposition to Trump's vow to shut
the U.S.-Mexican border on public hysteria grounds, supposedly because we San Diegans just can't possibly live without our
guac and margaritas, we're too la-la over here, and someone messing with our avocado supply should be enough to trigger the
fury of Surfer Dude Nation.
Press
goes Code Avocado against Trump. How can you take seriously an occupation that repeatedly dives off the deep
end over the tiniest of items? Avocado sales in the United States are a little more than $2 billion a year. In a
$20 trillion dollar economy, that is 1% of 1% of all activity. Mexico's $1.2 trillion economy will not suffer much
either. While shutting the border would be a hardship for avocado growers, open borders cost hundreds of Americans their
lives every year. But thanks to the media savvy of Steve Barnard, president and chief executive of Mission Produce, the
largest distributor and grower of avocados in the world, the press is on a mission to save avocados, not American lives.
The
Mueller-Industrial Complex Collapses. So much media is premediated now, it's almost impossible to find
something whose payload isn't partly composed of practice for future events. Most of the time, nobody even notices this
phenomenon. Premediation works because it homes in on natural anxieties or desires amplified by the hyper-mediated
ecosystem in which television, smartphones, social media, and all the rest rot and reanimate. Whom should I consider
voting for in the next election? Am I going to die if I board a plane? Those are questions whose future answers
seem to demand consideration today.
CBS
& NBC Cheer Student Climate Strike, Warn 'Future Might Not Exist'. On Thursday [3/14/2019] and Friday, CBS
This Morning and NBC's Today show celebrated left-wing student activists around the world preparing to walk out of
their classrooms to "demand action on climate change." The CBS report took a particularly dark turn as correspondent
Tony Dokoupil warned of "a future that might not even exist" for the young protesters. "Groups of students across
America say they will skip class tomorrow for the first national school strike over climate change," co-host Gayle King
proudly announced on Thursday's CBS This Morning. "Tomorrow's protests are planned in more than 130 U.S. cities and
about 90 countries worldwide," she added.
Study:
White People Responsible for Blacks' and Latinos' Higher Exposure to Pollution. A study in the Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences claims that white people contribute more to pollution than black and Latino people,
but the latter suffer from it more than the white polluters. "The air that Americans breathe isn't equal," USA
Today says in its report on the study. "Blacks and Hispanics disproportionately breathe air that's been polluted by
non-Hispanic whites, according to a study," USA Today says. "This new research quantifies for the first time the
racial gap between who causes air pollution — and who breathes it."
Rebuttal: Who
Declared this to Be Crazy Week? There are so many things stupidly wrong with this whole story that I don't even
know where to begin. First, this study, and many others like it, anchor their alarm on the supposed fact that particulate
pollution causes about 42,000 premature deaths in the U.S. every year. Though the EPA relies on this figure, the
epidemiology behind it is very weak. But without this scary statistic, a lot of regulations would fail even the most
generous cost-benefit test. Second, particulate levels have been falling fast for the last 25 years, and will
continue to fall in the future. Most studies such as this one are relying on obsolete data. What this means is
that most black and Hispanic Americans, even in the places that still have the highest air pollution levels like the Los
Angeles basin, are breathing air today that is lower in ambient pollution than white people inhaled 20 years ago.
Don't expect NPR or anyone else to put it in perspective this way. They've got an agenda and a narrative that needs
to be kept up.
Alabama
Tornado Victims Ask Trump To Sign Bibles; Meltdown Ensues. Another day, another obtuse, ridiculous meltdown in
the media over something Donald Trump did. This time we head to Alabama, in the wake of dozens of deaths and hundreds
who lost everything due to a vicious string of tornadoes. [...] This kind of petty craziness, played on a loop daily by our
media, is why Trump has a much better shot of winning in 2020 than he otherwise would have.
American
Air Is Clean And Getting Cleaner. [A]ir quality is very good pretty much everywhere in the United States.
This fact stands in stark contrast to utterly absurd claims in the media, such as blaming air pollution for killing 155,000
Americans. Why is there such a disconnect between reality and what the media say? Because bad news is
intrinsically more interesting than good news. It's the same reason that murder and violence grab top headlines, even
though both are near historic lows. [...] Air pollution is not a problem in the United States. It is a problem in
Europe, and it is a monumental problem in Africa, Asia, and the Middle East.
Media Hypes
Roger Stone 'Revelation' That Has Been Public For A Year. News outlets and media pundits on Friday [2/15/2019]
seized on a court filing in the special counsel's case against Roger Stone that referred to communication the longtime Trump
confidant had with WikiLeaks and Guccifer 2.0, the group of alleged Russian operatives suspected of stealing Democrats' emails
during the 2016 campaign. The court filing, which was touted as new, bombshell evidence by numerous news sources,
including CNN and MSNBC host Rachel Maddow, may be less than meets the anti-Trump eye.
Let's Chill about
Hate Crimes. "Jussie Smollett, one of the stars of the television show 'Empire,' was attacked in Chicago by 2
assailants who yelled racial and homophobic slurs," tweeted the New York Times on January 29. Mark the tone
of absolute certainty about an unconfirmed claim. Many other news outlets took the same tack. "Celebrities,
lawmakers rally behind Jussie Smollett in wake of brutal attack," reported ABC News. "Jussie Smollett Performs at
Troubadour Just Days After Chicago Attack: 'I Had to Be Here Tonight'" read a Los Angeles Times headline. Many
commenters linked the alleged attack to larger alleged sicknesses: "The racist, homophobic attack on Jussie Smollett is
far-right America's endgame," tweeted GQ, in a sentiment echoed by many others.
Bezos
vs. the Enquirer Could Be a Watershed. What to make of the battle between Jeff Bezos and the National Enquirer,
which we will delight in calling the affair of Bezos, Pecker and de Becker? Under any circumstance, the world's richest
man cheating on his wife with a sexy helicopter pilot, supported by racy texts and photos, would be a story for the National
Enquirer. Tasteful Americans may wish it weren't so, but Mr. Bezos is a public figure in the Supreme Court's definition.
WaPo
Spends $5.2M on Vanity Ad in [the] Wake of 1,200 Media Layoffs. After some 1,200 people lost their media jobs
last week, the far-left Washington Post spent $5.2 million to run a vanity ad during the Super Bowl. You have to
watch the Post ad to understand just how vacuous it is. What we have here is the highest form of propaganda
narrated by a Big Movie Star (Tom Hanks), produced only to give you a chronic case of the FeelSoGoodz.
The
MAGA-phobic manure-spreaders of media sensationalism. [Scroll down] Question: How many racist,
homophobic menaces wander around the upscale Streeterville neighborhood of liberal Chicago at 2 a.m. carrying rope and
bleach, yelling about "MAGA country?" Question: How many racist, homophobic menaces have ever heard of "Empire,"
could recognize Jussie Smollett, or know or care anything about his sexuality? Despite TMZ's claim that Smollett had
the "hell beat outta him" and attackers "broke his ribs" plus subjected him to a chemical attack, an ambulance was not called
and he instead "self-transported" to the hospital. CWB Chicago, a local public safety watchdog site, reported on police
dispatch records documenting that Smollett's friend "Frank" refused EMS services for Smollett; no mention of bleach was made;
"no or minor injury" was observed; and "officers never sent a 'flash; message with offender descriptions to field units."
An example of news media sensationalism: It Could
Take Joshua Tree 300 Years to Recover From the Government Shutdown. Though the government shutdown may have
ended last Friday [1/25/2019], Joshua Tree National Park will be feeling the ruinous effects of it for hundreds of
years. Throughout the duration of the shutdown, which lasted a record-long 35 days, national parks greatly suffered:
human waste piled up, lands were littered with trash, and some campgrounds and other public areas even closed to visitors, as
the parks weren't adequately staffed to stay open. It wasn't until after Joshua Tree closed on January 2, though, that
humans became excessively reckless, during which they off-roaded, graffittied rocks, started campfires in illegal areas, and
cut down protected trees.
The Editor says...
Sounds like a wee bit of an exaggeration. Human waste does not stick around for 300 years. Neither does
litter. Neither do tire tracks. But aside from that, the obvious solution is to privatize the park. (By the way,
graffiti is not a verb. Neither is off-road.) But this whole story seems very far-fetched. Were
a bunch of anarchist maniacs taking advantage the government shutdown, during which they could enter the unattended national parks
and spread garbage and feces everywhere? Sounds like a false flag to me: Somebody went into the park and trashed it,
in order to make the "government shutdown" as ghastly as possible — something that must be avoided at all cost —
when in reality very few people outside of a 200-mile radius from Washington DC even noticed the five-week shutdown.
The
Famed 'Doomsday Clock' Is Little More Than A Liberal Angst Meter. When the Doomsday Clock launched in 1947, the
initial setting was seven minutes to midnight. Since then, it's gone up and down. The furthest it got from
doomsday was 17 minutes in 1991. But it's clear from its movements over the past seven decades that the Doomsday Clock
is more about politics than any sort of scientific measure of the risk of nuclear annihilation. After all, the Clock
routinely counted down after a Republican wins the White House, and ticked up when Democrats reclaim the presidency.
Apocalypse
Creep. Nothing says "end of the world" like a big fake clock. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists gave
its annual Doomsday Clock presentation on Thursday [1/24/2019] and announced that it's still two minutes to midnight.
Last year, the group of 15 scholars and scientists moved the phony minute hand of fate 30 seconds closer to Armageddon,
from two-and-a-half minutes to midnight to its present setting, 11:58 pm sharp. By the Bulletin's logic, we're as
close to the end as we've ever been. The whole thing is adorably retro.
How
the media convinces us we're all outraged — even when no one cares. Lazy media reporters who are too
lazy to even actually speak to people anymore are instead constructing Potemkin Villages of fake hate, fake disgust and fake
outrage. They're Contemptkin Villages. No one really lives there. The laziest hacks can build them using
tweets, even tweets from anonymous Twitter accounts. Somehow these hacks are employed at places like the BBC and the
[New York] Times. [...] Shameless online editors today figure that readers will click through to anything that is supposedly
making anyone mad. And if the underlying story doesn't actually contain any evidence that anyone has blown his lid, too
late! Made ya click.
Government
shutdown lessons — We could take a chainsaw to so much of government. This government shutdown is
now longer than any in history. The media keep using the word "crisis." "Shutdown sows chaos, confusion and
anxiety!" says The Washington Post. "Pain spreads widely." The New York Times headlined, it's all "just too much!"
But wait. Looking around America, I see people going about their business — families eating in restaurants,
employees going to work, children playing in playgrounds, etc. I have to ask: Where's the crisis?
Media's anti-Trump addiction
amps up the outrage and fuels the public's suspicion. Alas, much of today's political journalism has fallen
into advocacy, intentionally inflammatory, using or omitting selective details, quotes and background to make a case against
President Donald Trump. The criticism generally centers on something he did or said he would do — or
something someone, usually unidentified, said he might do or is considering possibly doing. And then in a kind of
staged Kabuki dance, journalists run to gather reaction from waiting opponents who provide a predictably outraged quote
calling for counteraction. Yes, this president's name boosts ratings and clicks from both sides. But the media's
addiction to anything Trump lets this president manipulate them, which he does skillfully. It squeezes out other
important news. And it denies Americans a set of generally-accepted facts to debate, merely providing fodder for an
anti-Trump agenda and more argumentative ammo for both sides.
How
many times have the media predicted doom because of Trump, and how many times have they been dead wrong? On
Thursday [1/10/2019], there was a screaming headline on Drudge saying, "Doomsday." The article was from NBC News, and
the source of the doomsday report was the ever reliable Mark Zandi of Moody's. The purpose of the report was not to be
objective news, because anyone with a brain knows that the shutdown will end soon. The purpose was to scare the public,
tamp down economic growth, and destroy Trump.
Sorry, I Don't Feel
Sorry For Furloughed Feds. Now that the nation has heard the President explain how he wants to address our
immigration crisis, and we have all enjoyed the comic relief offered by Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer in lieu of a serious
response, the media have launched a propaganda campaign they hope will pull the Democrats from the ditch they have driven
into regarding "the wall." But our friends in the Fourth Estate are approaching the project in a manner that merely
highlights how divorced they are from the world beyond the Beltway. Their primary focus involves the heartrending
human tragedy of... idle bureaucrats.
The
Media Was Still Unglued in 2018. The comparisons to dictators (especially Hitler) were once shocking, but no
longer. These smears arrive almost daily. Take perpetually malcontent Steve Schmidt lecturing on MSNBC. Trump
"creates a mass sense of victimization amongst his base," he said. "And then he asserts extraordinary claims of power
to protect the victims from the scapegoated populations and the nefarious conspiracy. That is fundamentally illiberal,
deeply un-American, and, frankly, could be straight out of Munich circa 1928." Then there's the racial panic.
"Killing black people is an old American tradition, but it is experiencing a revival in the Trump era," wrote New York Times
columnist Paul Krugman. Trump & Co. is responsible for encouraging the murder of blacks? O-o-K. Krugman wrote
this junk after a lone gunman killed two African-Americans at a supermarket in Louisville, Kentucky. Any terrible event
can be quickly blamed on Trump.
Chuck
Todd's Perpetual Hype Machine: 'What If the President IS the Crisis?'. Meet the Press host Chuck Todd
has proclaimed he thinks NBC and MSNBC are a very "fact-based environment," unlike Fox News. But his opening to his
show on Sunday sounded like a dramatic editorial, underlining all of Trump's problems with Republican leaders and
conservative radio and TV hosts, throwing together the shutdown, the resignation of the defense secretary, and the stock
market decline into one grand opinionated summary: [Video clip]
Flashback:
Media Silence After Obama Fires General Mattis Without Even a Call. The liberal media and DC establishment suffered
a complete meltdown on Thursday [12/20/2018] after the sudden resignation by Secretary of Defense James Mattis. Talk of
impeachment, coups, and suicide abound over fears that Mattis was the last 'adult' keeping President Trump in check.
Mattis resigned as Trump moved to assert mastery over his presidency this week in key areas after nearly two years on the job.
Recap and overview of the Jim Acosta tantrum: Profiles
in Absurdity: Jim Acosta as First Amendment 'Hero'. The underlying facts are by now well-known: The
insufferable Acosta, surely the most obnoxious "correspondent" ever to hold a White House press pass — a dubious
distinction in a competition that includes Sam Donaldson (ABC) and the late Helen Thomas (UPI), among others — had
his credentials suspended after a particularly abrasive encounter with President Trump at a November 7 presser. In
a widely publicized incident, Acosta harangued at length, refused to relinquish the microphone when directed to do so, and
pushed away a young female intern who was trying to pass the mic to another reporter. White House press passes have
always been viewed as discretionary and subject to regulation, in order reasonably to limit the size of the press pool and
ensure proper decorum. Reporters are expected to be courteous and to exhibit professional behavior. The
attention-seeking Acosta, as is his custom, was grandstanding at the press conference, and breached longstanding protocols by
insisting on arguing disrespectfully with the president. For this, his "hard pass" — necessary to gain
entrance to the White House — was temporarily suspended. CNN was not barred from the White House; only
Acosta was.
Like
Drug Addicts, Reporters Demean Themselves For Just One More Trump Story. But, it's not enough. It's not
getting them the high they want. The high they crave. The traffic, the clicks, the views, the response... none of
it is the same. There's gotta be a stronger dose somewhere. So, when it comes time to cover the funeral of the
former president, they seek out something stronger. Trump is sitting by the Obamas and the Clintons! He's not
reciting the Creed! He is doing this or not doing that! And in the process, the funeral is no longer about
George H.W. Bush. It is about Trump. It's wrong. They know it's wrong. They can't help
themselves, though. They are addicts.
A
little hysteria can make the news go down. The mainstream/legacy/hothouse media has been rubbing sticks
together for months, trying to start a fire under the White House to frighten the administration into abolishing fossil fuels
before Christmas. Hysteria used to be the sworn enemy of newspapers. (Television, not so much.) Now everyone
manufactures it. Helene Cooper of The New York Times thinks it's OK to spread a little hysteria because becoming
"hysterical" is the right and proper response.
Trump
hatred fueled media's yearlong obsession with Avenatti and Stormy. 2018 was the year the mainstream media
willingly handed whatever was left of their credibility and dignity over to an aging porn star/stripper and her odious,
ethically challenged attorney. [...] At one point, Mr. Avenatti had become such a fixture on certain cable networks that
it almost appeared he had joined the prime-time lineup. Analysts at the Media Research Center categorized his
appearances on CNN over a two-month period. The results are as startling as they are embarrassing.
Another
nothing-burger? Catherine Herridge breaks down Michael Cohen's guilty plea 'bombshell'. Early Thursday
morning word broke that President Donald Trump's former personal lawyer Michael Cohen had pleaded guilty to lying to Congress
during its investigation into possible Russian collusion. Following the announcement, the perpetually hysterical left
broke into cheers of gleeful applause over the belief that the president would soon be the next one to be indicted.
Trump has the
goods on Democrats. CNN was so excited on June 6, 2017. Jim Comey was going to testify in Congress in two
days. The fired FBI director would start the ball rolling on the impeachment of the Orange Man. The cable outlet posted
a story, "Comey expected to refute Trump." Wolf Blitzer cranked up his self-righteousness to Pope Level. CNN
attached a countdown-to-Comey clock to its chyron. Then Comey released his opening statement to the public a day early.
Blitzer dialed down his attitude to DMV clerk. The countdown clock disappeared. The story was downgraded to "Comey
unlikely to judge on obstruction."
Jim Acosta Will
Only Behave When There's A Democrat In The White House. President Donald Trump says he's drafting rules of
decorum for White House reporters in the wake of the lawsuit involving CNN's aggressively misbehaving reporter Jim
Acosta. Funny how unruly press behavior never comes up when a Democrat is president.
White
House has to tell reporters how to act like adults. Sarah Sanders today issued rules of conduct for White House
reporters. Everyone in the press room should be embarrassed because like kindergartners, they have to be told to share
the microphone and take turns asking questions. These geniuses brought this nonsense on because they were too
pathetically lame to tell Jim Acosta to sit down and shut up. Instead, their self-important White House Correspondents
Association issued a statement of support, "Journalists may use a range of approaches to carry out their jobs and the WHCA
does not police the tone or frequency of the questions its members ask of powerful senior government officials, including the
President. "Such interactions, however uncomfortable they may appear to be, help define the strength of our national
institutions. We urge the White House to immediately reverse this weak and misguided action."
CNN
Requests Emergency Hearing After Trump Warns Acosta's Press Pass in Jeopardy Again. CNN host Brian Stelter
reports that the White House may once again revoke White House correspondent Jim Acosta's press credential after a judge
ruled to reinstate the "hard pass" last week. The network has asked for an emergency hearing in response to the
threat. "Friday's court ruling means that a temporary restraining order is in effect for 14 days. But W.H.
officials sent Acosta a letter stating that his press pass is set to be suspended again once the restraining order expires,"
Stelter tweeted late Sunday [11/18/2018].
The Editor says...
The suspension of a press pass for a single ill-behaved reporter is not an emergency.
Acosta
decision could make it easier for White House to kick reporters out. In short, the judge said to the White
House: You can't throw out a reporter without going through a process. But if you go through a process —
which you, the White House, can design — then you can throw the reporter out. In the end, it could be that Kelly's
ruling will make it easier for the White House to oust reporters in the future — and to make the decision stick.
Jim
Acosta is smug, and no court ruling changes that. CNN's Jim Acosta scored some court points with a ruling that orders the
White House to give back his press pass, at least for the time being. But he still presents as a smug elitist. He
presented as an out-of-touch elitist the day he jerked away from the arm of the reaching White House intern — the day he
refused to cede the microphone and cede the floor and cede his time to the many other journalists who were patiently waiting to pose
questions to the president.
Jim
Acosta and the Hubris of Celebrity Journalism. When do Jim Acosta's 15 minutes of fame expire? Has there
ever been anyone less deserving of the spotlight who has managed to hog it quite so thoroughly as CNN's White House show
horse? Most recently, on Nov. 7, Acosta gave President Trump a moral lecture in the form of a loaded "question" about
why Trump called the migrant "caravan" an "invasion." According to Acosta, it is not an invasion because the migrants were
hundreds of miles away, and besides, the migrants aren't going to be "climbing over walls and so on." One week later, as we
all know, members of the caravan (and of course it's not really a "caravan") were sitting astride the border wall and invading
U.S. territory. So much for Acosta's credibility. Mind you, the president answered Acosta's "When are you going to
stop beating your wife?" question, and acknowledged that he and the reporter have a difference of opinion about what an invasion
is, but Acosta was pressing his left-wing agenda and not actually trying to elicit information with his "fake question."
Acosta
Gets His Press Pass Back, But Trump Is the Real Winner. It would be the easiest thing in the world for the
White House to turn Acosta into a non-entity, just another cable-news squawker tut-tutting the president's decisions into a
camera from the White House lawn. Call on him, give him bland answers to his silly questions, and move on. Or
don't call on him at all! Instead, time after time, Trump and press secretary Sarah Sanders have allowed Acosta to
harrumph them into tiffs that become news stories in themselves. Last Friday's foolishness, with Acosta white-knuckling
the mic and Trump shouting and that poor intern visibly wishing she'd taken some other gig, was just the latest, greatest
example. Why? Because the White House loves it when Acosta is in the spotlight. He's the perfect
foil to Trump, the perfect face for the administration's constant campaign against the "fake news media."
Trump everyone's
hard passes then. A federal judge today [11/16/2018] ordered President Trump to restore Jim Acosta's hard pass
access to the White House despite Acosta's belligerence at a press conference. Just about every media outlet who gets
hard passes sided with Acosta. [...] Revoke all the hard passes. Make them stand in line each day with every other
reporter from outlets not so privileged seeking access. The press wants to play hardball, so play hardball. Why
give them this privilege when they hate him?
Everyone
Is Wrong About The Jim Acosta, White House Battle. Jim Acosta is a pundit who works for CNN. He was
credentialed to attend White House press briefings, which he routinely used as opportunities to share his personal political
views and animosity toward President Donald Trump. The situation with Acosta, who is known as a shameless grandstander
who seeks personal attention rather than a journalist who seeks to cover the news, came to a head last week when he
repeatedly violated decorum at the White House by offering personal opinions in the place of actual questions, fighting with
the president, interrupting the president, and belligerently refusing to return the White House microphone to a staff member.
Levin:
'No reporter has a constitutional right' to be in the White House. Tuesday [11/13/2018] on the radio, LevinTV
host Mark Levin called out the ridiculous stunt of CNN's lawsuit against the Trump administration over the antics of reporter
Jim Acosta. "The purpose of a presidential press conference is to allow as many reporters as possible to ask pertinent
questions, and for the president to answer them. In other words, a press conference is for the American people.
One of the difficulties the other members of the press and the president are having communicating with each other ... is Jim
Acosta. When Jim Acosta disrupts the press conference, monopolized the time, and basically gives his political opinions
about a president who he constantly calls a liar, we learn nothing," Levin said.
CNN's
Acosta stopped being a journalist long ago. Invariably, [Jim] Acosta makes his interactions with Trump all
about himself. The fact that the CNN reporter had his press credentials pulled — even if only temporarily —
will surely feed the legend and perhaps add a couple of zeros to his speaking fee or a future book deal. Still, Acosta deserved the
rebuke. He was arrogant, rude and sanctimonious. He was sent to cover the story, and he made himself the story. He was
supposed to ask questions, but instead he tried to "challenge" the president about the refugee caravan. He asked several questions,
instead of one. And when he got answers, he rejected them.
When reporters stick together —
as a mob. [Scroll down] Acosta wasn't there to ask questions. He was there to lecture and make
accusations, as were they all. But Acosta's disrespect and contemptuousness is special... especially obnoxious.
He is a hothead and, knowing his act, why he gets a front row seat at these briefings would be my first question. He is
no reporter, but rather a Resist Trump community organizer.
Progressive
Politics Are Not Really Progressive. When CNN White House Correspondent Jim Acosta stages his periodic
psychodramatic shout-downs of Sarah Huckabee Sanders or Donald Trump, he is no Edward R. Murrow bucking Joe McCarthy, but
rather he is one-upping his progressive like-minded journalists, virtue-signaling to his CNN liberal audience, and scoring
career chits with his left-wing bosses and employers.
Jim
Acosta isn't disliked because of his 'hard questions' but because he doesn't ask any real ones. There are a lot
of ways to describe what CNN's Jim Acosta does when he shows up for a White House press briefing or a press conference with
President Trump: stunt, showboat, grandstand. But you cannot say he's there to ask "hard questions," as the New York Times
characterized his routine in an editorial Thursday [11/8/2018].
Fearmongering
on the Left Has Been Ignored in 2018 Coverage. A CNN screen graphic bluntly asked on the morning of Tuesday's
midterms elections, "Will fear win?" I think the answer is "yes," but not necessarily for the same reasons as the Chyron With
Attitude. CNN was referring to President Donald Trump's aggressive rhetoric against illegal immigration, sending troops
to the border, and warning of the consequences of Democratic victories in the 2018 elections. It wasn't alone in
portraying the race as Democrats Vs. The Fearmongerers. The Washington Post reported Sunday that Trump is
"painting an astonishingly apocalyptic vision of America under Democratic control in the campaign's final days, unleashing a
torrent of falsehoods and portraying his political opponents as desiring crime, squalor and poverty."
Senate
report paints devastating profile of Justice Kavanaugh accuser Julie Swetnick. A new Senate committee report
questions the credibility of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh's three main accusers, dishing out the worst criticism at
gang-rape accuser Julie Swetnick. The 400-page report by the Judiciary Committee's Republican staff paints a
devastating portrait of Ms. Swetnick. She made the most sensational charges of the women accusers and won airtime
on national TV. The report depicts her as dangerous, a serial complainer, a liar, mentally unstable and cruel toward her
parents. It turns out that in one of Ms. Swetnick's previous sexual harassment complaints she was represented by
Debra Katz, the Democratic-connected attorney who took the case of Christine Blasey Ford. The Palo Alto, California,
psychologist emerged as the first accuser of Justice Kavanaugh, who ultimately won Senate confirmation on Oct. 5 to the
Supreme Court.
Democrats
have intentionally divided the country and stoked fear among the public for a very long time. Democrats have always
tried to scare the people on food stamps, Medicare, social security and Medicaid. Republicans want to starve children.
Democrats support Iran that spreads terrorism and pledges death to Israel and death to America. Democrats are the ones who
support Louis Farrakhan, not Republicans. Democrats are the ones that had the KKK leader as an honorable leader in the Senate
for years, not Republicans. Democrats are the ones that pushed the fictional "hands up don't shoot" narrative to gin up
racial hate and hate towards cops, not Republicans. Who knows how many deaths and how much violence that caused.
Democrats are the ones who created a fictional dossier to destroy a political opponent and used the Justice Department to spy on
them. The person that shot up the Jews in Pittsburgh hates Trump yet somehow the media blames Trump. The media has
supported Democrats no matter what they say or do and now they are willing enablers and participants in seeking to destroy Trump
and other Republicans no matter how much propaganda they have to spread.
'Nothing
to Gain,' Kavanaugh Accuser Raises Nearly $1 Million. During the crucible of Brett Kavanaugh's Senate
confirmation hearings, Democrats repeatedly asserted that Christine Blasey Ford had "nothing to gain" by coming forward with
her explosive accusation of attempted rape against the Supreme Court nominee. "You had absolutely nothing to gain by
bringing these facts to the Senate Judiciary Committee," Sen. Dick Durbin said during her testimony last month.
This sentiment was echoed by other Democrats, who presented it as evidence that Ford was telling the truth. "I want to
thank you," added California Sen. Kamala Harris, "because you clearly have nothing to gain for what you have
done." In fact, Ford stands to gain some $1 million and counting from national crowdfunding campaigns launched
by friends and other supporters, while she is said to be fielding book offers.
Avenatti's
media honeymoon is over following Kavanaugh accuser backlash. No private citizen has enjoyed more free airtime
on two-thirds of the major cable news networks than Michael Avenatti has in 2018. Tune in to CNN and there's a decent
chance you'll find him there. If he isn't on CNN, there's an equally good chance he'll be on MSNBC.
Are We on the Verge
of Civil War? The internet and social media often descend into an electronic lynch mob. In a nanosecond,
an insignificant local news story goes viral. Immediately hundreds of millions of people use it to drum up the
evils or virtues of either progressivism or conservatism. Anonymity is a force multiplier of these tensions.
Fake online identities provide cover for ever greater extremism — on the logic that no one is ever called to account
for his or her words. Speed is also the enemy of common sense and restraint. Millions of bloggers rush to be the
first to post their take on a news event, without much worry about whether it soon becomes a "fake news" moment of
unsubstantiated gossip and fiction.
CNN's
Jake Tapper Dedicates Segment to Trump's Penis. CNN aired a segment about Stormy Daniels' new book that
described what Donald Trump's genitals looks like on The Lead with Jake Tapper Tuesday [9/18/2018].
Weather
Channel Defends Reporter Mocked for 'So Dramatic' Hurricane Florence Coverage. The Weather Channel is defending
one of their own after a video of Hurricane Florence coverage went viral. The video, uploaded to Twitter, shows Weather
Channel meteorologist and reporter Mike Seidel bracing in the wind during a live shot in Wilmington, NC. As he is
struggling to keep his footing, two people walk behind him showing no signs of struggle. Twitter was not impressed.
Hilarious
video shows journalist 'bravely' reporting on Hurricane Florence — until two men in shorts casually stroll past.
A Weather Channel reporter looked to have played up the drama and severity of Hurricane Florence in a hilarious video that
has been circulating on Twitter. Weather Channel reporter Mike Seidel was shooting a live segment in Wilmington, North
Carolina, on Friday [9/14/2018] as winds barreled around him. In the clip, Seidel appears to brace his feet deeper into
the grass so that he won't go with the wind.
Teens
Stroll Past Reporter Who Can Barely Stand in Raging Winds. Weather Channel correspondent Mike Seidel in
Wilmington, North Carolina, looks like he's gallantly fighting the raging winds as he courageously reported live from
Hurricane Florence on Friday [9/14/2018]. "This is about as nasty as it's been," Seidel said dramatically. Shortly
after he made the comment, two teens in shorts are seen in the background strolling along, taking cell phone photos, having
no problem at all. [...] As an aside, did you notice how the media now counts homes without power? They don't count
homes, they estimate the number of people who might be in a home and multiple [sic] it by the actual homes.
Media
Hype: Mueller Probe 'Bombshell' Turns Out To Be Major Dud. According to various mainstream media figures
this week, Special Counsel Robert Mueller was all but certain to drop a bombshell Friday [8/31/2018] that would shake Washington, D.C.,
to its core. It didn't happen. NBC's Meet the Press host Chuck Todd on Thursday kicked off the Mueller "bombshell" frenzy,
warning viewers that Friday could go down in history as a turning point in the Russia investigation.
The
'Echo Chamber' Isn't A Conspiracy Theory, It's A Fact. When I finally got to the end of a supposed blockbuster
piece by the New Yorker's Adam Entous and Ronan Farrow regarding a dark conspiracy theory that had been spreading
within the Trump White House, I was struck by two things: 1) the innocuousness of the memo in question, and 2) how
the basis of the memo was plainly true. The piece, in fact, goes a long way in substantiating the memo's contention about the
media, allowing former Obama administration officials and their allies to offer ludicrous claims without even a scintilla of
journalistic skepticism.
After
Trump's "Worst Week" his approval plummets — I mean, barely changes. The convictions of Paul Manafort and Michael Cohen
had #TheResistance giddy with excitement. This was the end. He's a gonner. WORST WEEK EVER. [...] The NBC/WSJ polls is almost
exactly what Rasmussen finds as of August 24, 2018, 46% approval. On August 24, 2010, Obama had a 45% approval rating
according to Rasmussen. So despite a massively negative media environment for Trump and a massively positive media environment for Obama,
Trump's approval rating is the same as Obama at a similar time in his presidency.
Liberal
media's desperate push for Trump impeachment may actually hurt Democrats. The liberal news media have a new
favorite word to use when discussing President Trump: impeachment. For example, MSNBC and CNN reporters, anchors
and guests said "impeach," "impeachment" or some other form of the word on the cable news channels an incredible
222 times between 6 a.m. and 11:59 p.m. Wednesday [8/22/2018]. And of course, they talked about
possible impeachment other days as well, and newspapers and websites were also filled with impeachment speculation.
Most Democrats in Congress and their leaders are shying away from talking about impeachment before the November midterm
elections — but that's not stopping the anti-Trump media.
All the
Talk About Impeaching the President Is Nonsense. The television-news media desperately need to fill twenty-four
hours every day in order to sell advertising to support their stations, their management, their employees, and their negotiated
settlements and non-disclosure-agreement pay-outs to women whom they must silence after one or another of their male employees
has violated them. [...] So the television-news media have to keep the money pouring in. Same with the print media.
They need to grab your attention and hold it all day and night, every day. [...] So they have to figure out how to keep the
ratings up. They love a murder — oh, how they love a murder! Especially of a young pretty White girl. That
grabs the attention of everyone: men, women, liberals, conservatives, young, and old. [...] Even an isolated unsolved
murder of a single young White woman gets the media exercised into a frenzy: Jonbenet Ramsey, Elizabeth Short, Chandra
Levy, Kate Steinle, Mollie Tibbets. The Seedier Media obsess over these individual murders round-the-clock until it
emerges that the murderer was an illegal alien.
Summertime
and the media are embarrassing — from hating America to loving Antifa. In the space of one week, the press downplayed a
Democrat governor saying America "was never that great" and watched as the governor's brother/CNN anchor defended Antifa. Another CNN
commentator bashed America and mocked a conservative while she told of the discrimination her disabled son faced. And former CIA director
John Brennan, now an NBC national security analyst, recanted his claim that President Donald Trump committed treason and spent the week whining
about losing his security clearance.
CNN's
Philip Mudd Tells Paris Dennard to 'Get Out' for Telling the Truth. CNN counterterrorism analyst Philip Mudd
exploded at conservative CNN contributor Paris Dennard on Friday evening when Dennard made the completely factual claim that
former government officials with security clearance can land top D.C. jobs. Mudd and Dennard were debating on
Anderson Cooper 360°, guest-hosted by Jim Sciutto, over the question of whether President Donald Trump had been
right to revoke the security clearance of former Central Intelligence Agency director John Brennan.
Newsroom
commando Ralph Peters cashiers [him]self. This weekend, retired lieutenant colonel Ralph Peters went on CNN's
dubiously titled Reliable Sources and, in the presence of the show's serially unreliable host, Brian Stelter, and all
those unfortunate souls in airport waiting areas across the nation being force-fed this liberal Sunday-morning drivel,
cashiered himself. It appears that fulminating Trump Derangement Syndrome brought this former Fox News military analyst
to perform this sad ceremony. [...] As a combat veteran, which Peters is not, I have to wonder if this sneering, whiny-voiced
news show commando has a clue as to how many millions of his military family he has just branded as destructive, vengeful,
racist couch-potato anarchists, followers of a false messiah and derelict in our oaths to the Constitution. It is a
fact that a substantial majority of military personnel, whether active-duty, retirees, or veterans, are conservative in their
politics, so Peters had to know he was spitting in the faces of millions of his former comrades.
Enemies
of the People. [T]here is a certain equanimity that comes with realizing that so many of the daily crises are
not crises at all, and that so much of the media screaming is like visiting an ice cream store — each day a
different flavor, but all the same basic product ready to kill you if you don't control the portions, the frequency...
How Far Will
the Left Go? All the Way. [Scroll down] Each day brings a new outrage, a development
enthusiastically promulgated by a brain-dead media that thinks a headline must contain the words "sparks outrage" or "comes
under fire," to be newsworthy. The foxes of anger and resentment have been set among the hens of political cohesion,
and every day the squawking grows louder — as it will until that day comes when there are no more hens left to lay
the eggs.
As the Swamp Turns. It never ends,
does it? The daily cable-news soap opera installment. A new crisis every day. Sex. Money.
Secret tapes. A stripper whose upper torso gives new meaning to the term Silicon Valley. And then her
media-frenzied lawyer steeped in his own fun-to-watch divorce. Bring out the popcorn. Pull out some
Raisinets. Refill the Coke and Pepsi. Sneak in a few plastic straws. Another day's episode of "As the Swamp
Turns." Children separated from their parents. Parents sent back with their children — and then telling
the authorities: "Naah, we'll go back, but leave the kids separated here." Kids who do not even belong to the
parents. Russians — even red-headed Reds. Secret courts. Spies. Married paramours exchanging
mysterious messages: "Andy." "Secret plans." An "Insurance Policy." Smells at a Virginia Walmart.
Secret tape recordings. The only thing missing is the "other woman" with the unwanted and hidden pregnancy, suddenly
revealed — and the drama of whose baby it is. Enter Bill Clinton!
The
Conspiracy Theory That Ate New York. This is the helpful illustration that New York Magazine published to help
readers understand its convoluted — and, needless to say, #FakeNews — cover story alleging a Trump-Putin
plot that began in... 1987. Before the Soviet Union fell. Before Putin had assumed any sort of true power.
What
Critics Missed About the Trump-Putin Summit. When Presidents Trump and Vladimir Putin ended their joint press
conference in Helsinki, the punditocracy predictably swarmed all over it like ants around a pile of crumbs. Was Trump
winking at Putin? Did he really say he believes Putin more than he believes Robert Mueller about whether Russia
interfered in the 2016 election? Former Gus Hall enthusiast John Brennan, off his meds again, tweeted that the presser
was "treasonous." Professional chatterer Anderson Cooper said it was "perhaps one of the most disgraceful performances
by an American president at a summit." Every phrase, every gesture of the event will be picked apart and second-guessed
to death in the next few days.
How
to Read the News: A Guide for Truth-Seekers. The recent MSM and celebrity hysteria about the illegal immigrant children
being separated from their alleged parents would have had some impact with voters had not the truth been exposed in the Internet on unbiased
websites and twitter posts. Those pictures of immigrant children sleeping in cages brought tears (crocodile?) to MSNBC anchor Rachel
Maddow, who apparently failed to note that these heartbreaking photos were taken in 2014 during the Obama administration. The detention
center used by the Trump administration was a far cry from Obama's if one viewed them on one of the more credible news sites like Breitbart.com.
The Zombie Media.
Journalism schools do not teach journalism anymore. They teach persuasive storytelling. They teach the Machiavellian
black art of propaganda. Like most black arts, left-wing "journalism" relies heavily on its own peculiar dogma of magical
rites and incantations. To shut down Herman Cain in 2012, our leftist adversaries invented (or at least exaggerated) the
ever popular sex scandal — the trusted and true kill shot they have used to assassinate troublesome public figures
for decades. Republicans nailed by a weeping and well paid accuser have typically curled into the fetal position and
faded away.
Chris
Matthews Urges Communist Revolution to Stop Supreme Court. So the Chris Matthews [plan] is for the Democrats to
declare a Communist revolution, call in the Russians for help, start executing their own people for being insufficiently
left-wing, go down to defeat, flee the country while kidnapping a bunch of children and stealing all the gold? Actually
I think that is their plan.
Journalists circulate
conspiratorial claims against DHS Doc claiming it has Nazi code. Multiple journalists circulated a conspiracy
theory on Twitter that a document from the Department of Homeland Security contained a Nazi code Thursday [6/28/2018]. [...]
The tweets reference a press release from DHS titled "We Must Secure The Border And Build The Wall To Make America Safe
Again" and was released in February, garnering little attention until recently.
Ex-CNN
producer blasts Jim Acosta for 'self-serving antics'. A former CNN producer took to Twitter on Friday
[6/29/2018] to blast Jim Acosta, the network's White House correspondent, for what he called Acosta's "self-serving antics,"
saying they "give all good journalists a bad name." The posts by Steve Krakauer, a former senior digital producer for
the network who is now is a top executive at Commerce House, a Dallas-based advertising firm, were prompted by a question
that Acosta shouted to President Donald Trump on Friday [6/29/2018] during a White House event on the economy and tax cuts.
Immigration
'crisis' brought to you by the Media Matrix. Starting a week ago Friday, the media discovered (surprise!) that
the Trump White House is taking a hard line on illegal immigration — and the pharisees of CNN and MSNBC began
dressing themselves in sackcloth and ashes to impress us with the sincerity of their shock and dismay at finding out that
children coming across the border illegally are separated from the adults who accompanied them (not necessarily their
parents). Honestly, if you need a give-away (a "tell" as they say in poker) that the left-wing media is conspiring
to damage this president, all you need to do is click back and forth between CNN and MSNBC for about three hours. If every
time you turn on one of these channels they are parroting the same story back at you with different talking heads pouring ashes
on each other and cursing Trump, then you know you are in the middle of a feeding frenzy.
Delusion
About Detentions: On Family Separation at the Border. Upstanding journalists, their fellow right-minded
pundits, and progressive elected official friends are outraged! According to them, the Trump Administration's
approach to immigration enforcement is cruel, un-American, inhumane, barbaric, and even medically dangerous. [...] The
problem is the facts are at odds with the conventional media interpretation of existing legal precedent, prior administrations'
practices, and even relevant federal statutes. You know, the law. But being wrong on the facts has never
stopped the media and their useful idiots in the commentariat from maligning the Trump Administration unfairly to suit their
agenda. Now they're shrieking about "baby jails." It's insane.
News
Fatigue? Join the Club. A Pew Research study recently found that nearly 7 in 10 Americans suffer
from "news fatigue" — a phenomenon even more pervasive among Republicans. The survey focused on the volume as
much as the quality of the offerings. But why wouldn't the public be emotionally expended from the anger and accusations,
bullying and backbiting, "fake news" and "fact checks," insults and innuendo, posturing and protests, threats and trolling,
and virtue-signaling and violent rhetoric and imagery spewed from every direction today?
The Editor says...
Whenever a big furor suddenly and simultaneously appears on every television "news" channel, there's a reason for it.
It is almost always a manufactured crisis designed to displace some other story. The "anchor baby prison" and "kids in cages" hype
is a false description of conditions that are nothing new. The same laws and policies have been in place for months and years.
The reason all this is now front and center is that Donald Trump's popularity is steadily increasing — now surpassing that of
Barack H. Obama — and it appears that he is about to single-handedly end the Korean War. That is an accomplishment
that must not be allowed to stay in the hourly news cycle if the news media's preferred party is to have any power.
Desperately
Seeking Supremacists. Talia Lavin is (or was, at last word) a fact-checker for the New Yorker. She
achieved overnight Twitter-fame by accusing an ICE agent of being a white supremacist. [...] Part of the story, I think, is
that the Left is hard up for white supremacists. Liberals talk about them all the time, but to the best of my
knowledge, I have never met one. Have you? Liberals need to come up with someone other than Richard Spencer;
hence the eagerness to libel a heroic ICE employee.
Update: New
Yorker staffer resigns after falsely accusing ICE agent of having Nazi tattoo. The fact-checker for the New
Yorker who mistook a Marine veteran's tattoo for a Nazi symbol has resigned, saying the "small mistake" has ruined her
life. Talia Lavin is out of a job following her June 18 tweet that caused mass outrage. "I feel like I made a
small mistake and it's destroyed my life," she told New York Magazine's The Cut. Lavin's since-deleted tweet was about
Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent Justin Gaertner, whom she falsely accused of having a tattoo of the Nazis' Iron Cross.
The
Astonishing Silliness of CNN. The good people at CNN can do what they want, but this blatant chyron-splaining
sends a rather clear and unfortunate message: that they think their audience is daft and incapable of figuring things
out for themselves. CNN is frequently breathless when no one should be breathless, which would be kind of exhausting,
if anyone cared. Take this headline from the network's website this week: "The 45 Most Astonishing Lines from
Donald Trump's Nashville Speech."
Mainstream
Media's Credibility Problem Is Of Their Own Making. So, not only are the mainstream media biased, they're also incompetent. Headlines and
scandalous snippets that the news shows can flash on chyrons trump facts, and they are what is important to the mainstream media. They eschew fact
checking in favor of sensational headlines. They create salacious news narratives, meant not to inform but to sell advertising.
The Firesign Theater Media.
The "mainstream media" (CNN, MSNBC, the three networks, the major newspapers, et al.) are so consumed by Trump hysteria that
it places them squarely in this Firesign Theater zone. Nicholas Kristof and his wife talk about the president in
bed. Brian Stelter describes himself as "Trump addicted." Any psychiatrist can tell you that monomaniacal, pathological
hatred has its surreal aspects. Trump as the great white (orange?) whale and the media as Captain Ahab. MSNBC's
exegesis of the importance of the Mueller investigation in its various guises is a good example of this "Credo quia absurdum"
(I believe because it is absurd) approach. Rachel Maddow, Stephanie Ruhle, and Chris Hayes constantly strain to outdo
themselves with conspiracy theories. One would think there were more Russians involved with the Trump campaign than
populate the pages of War and Peace. More entertaining are the nightly shouting matches on Don Lemon's CNN show.
Mueller
Year One: The Real Heroes in Journalism. CNN won an award for its January 2017 report about President-elect
Trump being briefed on the bogus Steele dossier. While we now know the story was improperly leaked by former Director of
National Intelligence (and virulent Trump foe) James Clapper to shotgun the Trump-Russia collusion plotline days before the
inauguration — and the celebrated CNN reporters did little more than regurgitate talking points spoon-fed to them by
political operatives (one is known to have close ties to Fusion GPS) — the network was applauded for its "depth of reporting."
Estimate:
Cable News Nets Have Given Michael Avenatti $175 Million Worth Of Airtime. [Scroll down] Another
thing: He's doing it with no help from Fox. If I'm not mistaken, the only FNC show he's been on is Shannon
Bream's in March. He was, allegedly, scheduled on Martha MacCallum's show recently but canceled at the last
minute. Tucker Carlson invited him on but Avenatti told his producer that he only wants to do Hannity's show, an
obviously deliberate slight to Carlson. (Or is it a compliment, with Avenatti suspecting he'd have a harder time outmaneuvering
Tucker in an interview?) Whether he's avoiding Fox because he's wary of the hostile reception he'd get there or because he's
building a brand as a #Resistance hero and wants viewers to identify him with anti-Trump CNN and MSNBC, the fact remains that he's
somehow achieved cable ubiquity without any exposure on the most highly rated cable news network in the country.
Court
Documents Show Porn Star Lawyer Reported $8 Million Windfall in Feb. When he Took on Stormy. The Michael
Avenatti Files — How did a bankrupt attorney come across $8 million after picking up porn star client Stormy
Daniels? Porn star lawyer Michael Avenatti is a huge hit with the Democrat-media complex. The attorney for porn
star Stormy Daniels has held 108 interviews on cable news outlets MSNBC and CNN since March 7th.
2018:
When Orwell's 1984 Stopped Being Fiction. When I trained as a journalist, we reserved a "Revealed" or an
"Exposed" for those special occasions when we were able to bring to the reader information those in power did not want
known. These were the rare moments when as journalists we could hold our heads high and claim to be monitoring the
centres of power, to be fulfilling our sacred duty as the fourth estate. But today's Guardian's "exclusive" story
"Revealed: UK's push to strengthen anti-Russia alliance" is doing none of this. Nothing the powerful would want
hidden from us is being "revealed". No one had to seek out classified documents or speak to a whistleblower to bring us this
"revelation". Everyone in this story — the journalist Patrick Wintour, an anonymous "Whitehall official", and the
named politicians and think-tank wonks — is safely in the same self-congratulatory club, promoting a barely veiled
government policy: to renew the Cold War against Russia.
CNN
Hosts Porn Star's Lawyer Michael Avenatti 59 Times in Less Than Two Months. CNN has exhibited a fetish for the
Stormy Daniels story, particularly for her Trump-smacking lawyer, Michael Avenatti. In less than two months (from March 7
to April 30), Avenatti has been a guest on CNN a total of 59 times — an average of more than once per day.
MRC analysts combed through transcripts of all of CNN's 2018 coverage looking for references to interviews with Avenatti, and
then double-checked using our video archive. Since Avenatti's first appearance on March 7, he has been interviewed on
CNN a whopping 59 times, more than one-third of which (19) were with Anderson Cooper — who, of course, interviewed
Stormy Daniels on CBS's 60 Minutes back in March.
Black Coffee: The
Starbucks Story Is Trash. This is a country of 325-million people. If two guys getting tossed out of a coffee
shop is news, then things in Donald Trump's America must be going [very] well. But if the story were only meaningless trash,
it would just be typical of American journalism. But it's pernicious trash meant to advance a false left-wing narrative,
which is — oh yeah! — typical of American journalism.
CNN's
dicey interview with student on lockdown after Maryland school shooting. CNN engaged a student to pass along
casualty stats from a school shooting, even though the student himself made clear that his own familiarity with the details
was limited. And then, when police showed up to escort him and his classmates from the school, CNN asked him to
stay on the line, presumably to get a guided audio tour of the aftermath.
A
User's Guide To Media Coverage Of Political Protests. Liberal protests are newsworthy because they're disruptive; conservative
protests are too orderly to be worth discussing. The news angle with the gun protests was the disobedience involved in walking out,
something to be celebrated. Leftist protests demand police activity because leftists break stuff, and they demand to be arrested
because it somehow makes them heroic. One hundred thousand conservatives could show up on the National Mall in our nation's
capital and not leave behind so much as a candy wrapper on the ground. Bo-ring.
The
'scandal' of Perla Morales-Luna's arrest is fake news. The arrest of Perla Morales-Luna on March 3 in San Diego
is an absolute nonscandal. Yes, at first glance the video looks a little concerning. It shows a mother being separated
from her screaming family as Customs and Border Patrol officers struggle to put her in the back of a vehicle. But only at
first glance. Because if you watch again you'll see that the CBP officers use proportionate force and good efficiency in
getting Morales-Luna off the street and into custody. That's the best way to ensure no one is harmed and the situation isn't
escalated unnecessarily. Moreover, the CBP wasn't simply detaining Morales-Luna because she was just a random illegal immigrant.
Nikolas
Cruz Is the Result of 'It Takes a Village'. Does everyone see what the Democrats have done? They've
pitted children against us, thereby mainstreaming and normalizing child exploitation. What the Democrats did to
Parkland student Emma Gonzalez was as sickening a display as any I've ever witnessed. They coaxed an understandably
distraught child to spew one debunked Democrat lie after another — and, of course, plenty of invective toward
President Trump. David Hogg, a 17-year-old Parkland student, asked on CNN: "If you can't get elected without taking
money from child murderers, why are you running?" Normal question from a 17-year-old, right? Wondering aloud if he
came up with that question all on his own, with such emotionally vivid lingual sophistication and political acumen, must make
me a grumpy old gun nut who thinks our youth are stupid.
The
Portraits and the Obama Reality Distortion Field. [T]he Obamas are the center of the most delusional cult of personality
that the media has yet spawned. [...] This isn't journalism. It's not a free press. It's a bunch of cult members rushing out to
explain that the flawed thing is flawless. You're the flawed one for not seeing its gloriousness. All hail the beloved leader.
Joe
Concha: Media's Trump Anger Mostly 'Performance Art at This Point'. After it was made public that
President Trump had requested the Pentagon to plan a military parade through Washington, DC, there was a steady stream of
forceful condemnation of the President in which they claimed he was imitating foreign dictators. And in an appearance
on Fox News' Tucker Carlson Tonight Thursday [2/8/2018], Hill media reporter Joe Concha knocked them for playing up
their outrage and playing to an audience.
CNN:
Undetected Asteroids Could Threaten Earth During Government Shutdown. Two CNN correspondents claimed during an
episode of The Lead with Jake Tapper that an asteroid could potentially threaten the Earth if the government shutdown
continues. CNN correspondent Tom Foreman recalled the time NASA could not monitor "potentially dangerous asteroids" for
over two weeks, implying that NASA would not be able to prevent an asteroid attack if it hit Earth while the government shut down.
TV
crew busted trying to sneak fake bomb into airport. Seven members of a cable TV crew were arrested at Newark Airport on
Thursday [1/18/2018] after trying to film themselves passing a fake explosive device through a security checkpoint and onto a plane,
according to reports. The crew was working for the cable network CNBC, according to nj.com. The fake explosive device was
in a carry-on bag and never made it past security, Transportation Security Administration spokesman Michael McCarthy said.
"They failed, were caught and were arrested on multiple charges," he said, without elaborating on the charges.
CNN's
Sanjay Gupta Diagnoses Donald Trump With Heart Disease. Wednesday [1/17/2018] on CNN's "New Day," Dr. Sanjay Gupta,
the network's chief medical correspondent, proclaimed that based on President Donald Trump's coronary calcium scores going back to the
previous decade, Trump has heart disease. Gupta's diagnosis came a day after Trump's doctor, Navy Rear Adm. Dr. Ronny
Jackson, offered his assessment of Trump's health at a White House press briefing.
Armchair diagnosis of a patient he has never examined: Sanjay
Gupta: By all standards, Trump has heart disease. CNN's chief medical correspondent, Dr. Sanjay
Gupta, said Wednesday that he believes tests reveal that President Trump has heart disease. Gupta said dating back to
2009, Trump started to have "these tests that are actually looking for the presence of calcium in the blood vessels that lead
to the heart." "Steadily, up until just this past week when he had it performed again, those numbers have gone up," he
said. "When they get to a certain range ... that means he has heart disease."
Leftist
Toilet Mouths Condemn Trump as They Corrupt Nation. President Trump denies having used a vulgar term last
Thursday [1/11/2018] to describe dysfunctional Third World countries. Yet there's no denying that the leftist media,
believing he did, responded by repeatedly disgorging the term in a childish orgy of decadence. Of course, the media no
doubt think they're damaging Trump — but they're actually damaging society. Let's be clear: Leftists
certainly object to the substance of Trump's comments, that we shouldn't continually absorb poor, unskilled, often
functionally illiterate and unassimilable people from Third World nations. But they also object to his alleged style,
labeling as obscene the use of s-hole (toilet) to describe such places. So to show us how bad such language is, the
Crude News Network (CNN), for example, used it at least 36 times on Thursday. It's sort of like inveighing
against animal abuse and then bludgeoning dozens of dogs to death on air to prove your point.
CNN
Leaps Into The Toilet: Network Aired 195 Uses of 'S***hole' on Friday. In the contest for Most Offended
News Network after President Trump reportedly referred to African nations as "s***hole" countries, CNN wins hands down.
NewsBusters staff combed through CNN transcripts on Nexis for the S-hole word in the 24 hours of January 12 — the
first full day after The Washington Post reported the controversy — and found CNN staffers and CNN guests
uncorked the profanity 195 times in one day. That doesn't count Saturday, Sunday or Monday. They could be headed
for 1,000 by now. It also doesn't count the amount of time they put the S-word on screen (sometimes twice, as
you can see on Cuomo's temporary prime time show.) Compare that to Fox News Channel. Their curse count was
zero. FNC told staff and guests not to say it.
Revealed: Trump guzzles Diet
Coke. [Scroll down] If not for Fox News we'd be totally in the dark, about everything, and it was from there
that I first heard about CNN's alarming report: [Something important?] No, not exactly. Rather, it's been reported,
first from The New York Times, that Trump likes Diet Coke. Wait — it gets worse. He guzzles down a dozen a
day. So given such a scoop, CNN could not resist breaking it at around the same time that [a terrorist attack] was going on
at Port Authority. New Yorkers were running for their lives... but first things first; Trump is a glutton for Diet Coke
What Were
the Motives of the Port Authority Bomber? What were the motives of Ayaked Ullah, the Port Authority bomber in
yesterday's attack? There are many news headlines that address the issue, and they advance differing theories, each of
them presented as fact.
CNN
Promotes 'White Nonsense Roundup:' White Liberals Who Save Victimized People Of Color On Social Media. In a
piece titled "These are your white allies on Facebook," CNN enthusiastically introduces us to a group called "White Nonsense
Roundup" (WNR). Essentially, the group of roughly 100 "white ally" volunteers take turns swooping in to save African
American people (already suffering from the "emotional labor" of systemic racism) from social media arguments when issues of
race arise. You know, because these white liberals are "woke" enough to recognize their inherent sin of whiteness and,
apparently along with CNN, think people of color need white people to fight their social media battles for them.
New
York Times forced to heavily amend another supposed K.T. McFarland 'scoop'. The New York Times got ahead of
itself again with yet another supposedly hot scoop involving former deputy national security adviser K.T. McFarland, the
Russians and the 2016 presidential election. The story, now titled "McFarland's Testimony About Russia Contacts Is
Questioned," reported originally that an email sent by the former Trump transition official indicated she lied to Congress
this summer when she was questioned about disgraced Gen. Michael Flynn's communications with the Russians. The
article has been heavily amended since publication so that it is now mostly innuendo. The initial references to the
emails have been removed, and the story now leans mostly on Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., who only questions whether
McFarland was forthright in her testimony.
How D.C. political assassins
use media to oust Rex Tillerson. If several major media outlets are to be believed, at least two senior
administration officials say Chief of Staff John Kelly has drawn up a plan to replace Tillerson with CIA Director Mike
Pompeo, who would be replaced by Sen. Tom Cotton by year's end or soon after. The Washington media lap up these
anonymous leaks like starving kittens. Personnel contests, like shallow election horse race stories, are easy to do,
appear to contain drama and inside info and elevate the reporter to someone-in-the-know. The fundamental problem with
these self-serving reports is the sources are unknown, so news consumers cannot judge their trustworthiness and
motivations. Which, of course, is the point of hiding their identities. Consumers must trust the reporters and
media outlets, a dubious act in this era of rampant Trump antipathy. The New York Times started this latest
Tillerson-is-a-goner meme.
Unhinged
coverage of Trump is hurting the media. Not only is everything (still) hyper-politicized, but the lines between
news media, lifestyle media and flat-out activism have faded into irrelevance. On Wednesday [11/22/2017], the lead
story in Teen Vogue, next to stories about how "I Will Never Use Regular Soap Again After THIS $6 Foam Body Wash" and
"Everyone Basically Wore Lingerie to the VS Fashion Show After Party," was this screaming headline: "The United States
Voted 'No' on an Anti-Nazi UN Resolution." It ran over a terrifying picture of crowds carrying banners, some featuring
swastikas, with smoke in the background suggesting a terror attack. Only when you click through do you discover that
there is no news here whatsoever: The US votes against this meaningless, nonbinding UN gambit every year because the US
has this thing called the First Amendment. President Obama's appointees also opposed the resolution.
A Year to be Thankful For.
I'm thankful my fears about Donald Trump seem to have been unfounded. Not a fascist. Not a secret liberal.
Not an incompetent. ISIS is defeated. GDP at 3% plus. Some 60 great originalist judges nominated.
Regulations cut back at an amazing rate. Our lying leftist press humiliated and discredited. I'm thankful
because, whenever I get tired of watching an America in crisis, all I have to do is turn off the mainstream news and America
is not in crisis anymore. In fact, America is doing quite well.
Whittle:
The News Media Knows How To Stop These Massacres, But Refuses To Do It. In his latest video, conservative
commentator Bill Whittle discusses the most effective way to end the surge of mass murders that America has suffered in the
last twenty years — and it's one that falls squarely at the feet of the national news media. Citing forensic
psychologist Park Dietz, who has studied mass murderers extensively, Whittle contends that we've seen a wave of mass
shootings like Las Vegas and Sutherland Springs because the media insists on providing 24/7 coverage of the tragedies,
turning suicide massacres into a chance for glory for the sociopaths carrying out the heinous acts.
The Puerto Rican
Genocide That Wasn't. The death toll in Puerto Rico currently stands at 48. Hurricane Maria made landfall
in Puerto Rico on September 20. As we approach October 20, the death toll from the hurricane is a lot less than
the death toll from the deadliest month in Chicago. Despite media arm waving, with only 117 people not accounted for,
the actual death toll in Puerto Rico isn't likely to rise very much. And even a death toll of 48 was only achieved by listing
people who died of heart attacks and other medical problems that could not be treated because of hurricane damage. It's
unknown whether some of them might have lived without the hurricane. It's guesswork. The previous, incomplete
death toll showed that the actual hurricane seemed to have only killed 19 people. 2 suicides were also
attributed to the hurricane. As were respiratory failures "indirectly linked" to the hurricane. But the media
has been working hard to inflate the death toll. "We'll probably never know exactly how many people died," the Washington
Post speculates. "Hurricane Maria likely killed more people than Puerto Rico says," the Daily News ghoulishly insists.
No,
Mr. Krugman, There is Not a Cholera Outbreak in Puerto Rico. Yesterday [9/30/2-17], liberal pundit and
New York Times columnist Paul Krugman incorrectly tweeted that cholera, a deadly bacterial disease caused by
unsanitary water, had resurfaced in Puerto Rico. [...] Then moments later, he corrected himself with a follow up tweet.
[...] You will notice his fake news has amassed thousands of retweets and favorites, while his correction has not.
Hurricane
Irma And How The Left Has Politicized Even The Weather. A number of years ago, I sat down with the general
manager of a major television news station. He told me that in their own survey, viewers tuned in for "weather first,
sports second, and news last." Therefore he stressed, weather forecasters were the "cash cow" of the station. He
further explained that much of television weather forecasting was a "sham." He said that decades ago, they would give a
"one-day" forecast. But then Station B across town went to a "two-day" forecast. So then they countered with a
"three-day" forecast," until everyone went to the "useless seven-day" forecasts. He emphasized that it was all done for
reasons of competition and ratings and that with a "seven-day" forecast, the station and the networks were playing viewers
for "fools," because they normally "couldn't even get the forecast for tomorrow correct."
While
People Die, Washington Post Obsesses Over Melania Trump's Shoes. Searching for a scandal the way a crackhead
hunts for crack, the media decided that the real story of the natural disaster ought to be Melania Trump's shoes.
Because that is what the media is now. Melania Trump wore high heels while getting on Air Force One. The media
howled that she was heading to a flood zone while wearing high heels. Never mind that she was still far from the zone
and was just boarding a plane. Then she landed in Texas, wearing sneakers. And that was also bad.
Between
alt-right and 'antifa,' media still manages to be worse. The only people dumber than the Neanderthals and Brass
Knuckle Draggers are the insufferably tedious referees known as the Stupid Media who shape the country as a barking mad
carnival, whipping up hysteria for every armed showdown.
CBS
News joins O.J. Simpson on the hunt for the real killers. In the wake of O.J. Simpson's parole last week, CBS
News has a story today titled "Who killed Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman?" Curiously, the story doesn't attempt to
answer that question. Instead, the entire premise of the story is that the investigation into the murders is officially
still open in Los Angeles.
Worst
media moments of the week: NY Mag climate screed wins! [Scroll down] "There are now, trapped in Arctic ice, diseases that have not circulated in the
air for millions of years," goes one of the milder passages. It was so bad that climate alarmist and hockey stick creator Michael Mann teamed up
with two others to write a response, arguing, "Doomsday scenarios are as harmful as climate change denial." Mann and his compatriots criticized the New
York Mag piece as painting, "an overly bleak picture, arguing that climate change could render the Earth uninhabitable by the end of this century."
They also called it out for errors. Mann made an interesting comment that seems to go right over the head of eco-journalists, explaining, "fear does
not motivate, and appealing to it is often counter-productive." Yet fear is about 99.99 percent of all media climate catastrophe coverage.
"The more it sensationalizes the commonplace, the more boring its coverage becomes." The Media's Endless Anti-Trump Show
Trial. It is a measure of the anti-Trump media's stupidity and malpractice that the phrase "breaking news" now elicits eye
rolls. The media's "breaking news" about Trump is rarely breaking or news. It is usually recycled and old — some stale
piece of information, relating to a practice both parties long ago adopted, that is sensationalized and dished up as novel. Into
this category falls much of its breathless "Trump-Russia" coverage, including its all-hands-on-deck stories about Donald Trump Jr.
The
media's mass hysteria over 'collusion' is out of control. Hysteria among the media and Trump opponents over the
prospect of "collusion" between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin may have hit its crescendo this week. That's
right: The wailing from the media and their allies about Donald Trump Jr.'s meeting with some "Kremlin-connected
Russian lawyer" (whatever that means) may be the last gasp of this faux scandal. Good riddance. Predictably, the
New York Times started the ball rolling with front-page coverage, going so far as to argue, "The accounts of the meeting
represent the first public indication that at least some in the campaign were willing to accept Russian help." As if this
were some breakthrough moment. The Times followed up with a headline yesterday [7/10/2017] that the meeting request and
subject matter discussed in the prior story were transmitted to Trump Jr. via an email. [...] The Times is so desperate to
move the story that the meeting's arrangement over email is being made into Page 1 news.
What
counts as treason differs depending on the letter after your name. In 2012, Obama met with Russia and said he
would be more flexible if he was re-elected. The media and Democrats had no problem. There were no investigations
and no spying on Obama looking for collusion. The Clintons, the Clinton Foundation, and their close associates got huge
amounts of money from foreign governments including Russia. In return, Russia got uranium, some of which it transferred
to Iran. There were no investigations by the FBI; Democrats and the media didn't care. Kickbacks for uranium to
the enemy looks like actual treason. [...] But Donald Jr. had a ten-minute meeting where he thought he might get dirt on
Hillary in which he got nothing and gave nothing in return, and he and his father are essentially accused of treason.
Byron
York: Trump-Russia investigation takes sharp turn toward the dumb. What a mess for the White House.
And all for nothing. When the meeting actually happened, at Trump Tower on June 9, there was a reason Jared Kushner
left after a few minutes and Paul Manafort spent the whole time staring at his phone. The "Crown prosecutor" of
Russia — there is no such position — was actually a shady lawyer, Natalia Veselnitskaya, who had no
"official documents" to offer but wanted to harangue Trump Jr. about U.S. sanctions on Russia. Trump Jr. quite
reasonably saw there was nothing there and cut the meeting off after about 20 minutes. But in a capital consumed
with Trump and Russia, the revelations, first reported in the New York Times and then substantiated by Trump Jr. himself,
blew up into the Scandal That Ate Cable TV.
Some subways are literally held together
with zip ties. At more than $1 million per subway car, you'd think they'd be held together with something more than zip ties. [...] An
MTA spokeswoman said Wednesday that the zip tie was being used as a temporary fastener to attach a cable to the new R186 cars while a special part is being
made. She added that the cable is attached another way, and the zip tie is just a back-up.
The Editor says...
The article immediately above, as you can see from the two sentences excerpted above, is an example of self-contradictory sensationalism.
NYT's
Latest Trump Story Follows A Familiar Pattern Of Breathlessly Reporting Routine Procedures. The establishment
media's hysteria is once again in high gear after news that members of the Trump transition team were ordered to preserve
documents and other materials pertinent to the investigation into Russian interference of the election. Trump's
transition team's counsel, issuing a memo to satisfy routine requirements in any investigation, hardly called for the tone
and seriousness with which it was reported. The New York Times asserts that the request "illustrated the seriousness of
the inquiry" conducted by special counsel Robert Mueller, and how "deeply they are delving" into President Donald Trump's
activities. Such rhetoric follows a longstanding pattern of the establishment media's propensity to overreact to even
the most routine circumstances with anything related to the president. The Washington Post's Tom Nichols says that
media personnel "seem determined to overreact on even ordinary matters."
Winners
and Losers from Comey Hearing. Mainstream media cable networks like CNN had countdown clocks. Broadcast networks covered the
hearing as if it would go down as one of the most seminal events in the history of the country. "Never Trump" Republicans were getting ready
to be used as the mainstream media's useful idiots and get their predictable television hits and quotes in mainstream media publications.
Left-wing Democrats were dreaming of drafting articles of impeachment. They lionized Comey as their hero who would help them destroy Trump
once and for all. Not so fast.
I think they do this intentionally. Grrr
59% say news media make them angry, dissatisfied. Nearly six in 10 Americans are upset with the news media,
claiming in a new poll that it makes them angry and dissatisfied.
CNN
Goes Bonkers: Spends 10 Hours on Comey Before a Single Word of Testimony. Former FBI Director James Comey
has not said a single word in public, but the liberal media have been salivating for days over his upcoming testimony on
Thursday. Case in point: from noon on Thursday (June 1) when the date for the testimony was set, until noon today
(June 7), CNN has already devoted more than 10 hours of coverage to testimony that has yet to even occur.
The
Media Is Now Leaking Classified Info Just Because They Feel Like It. This morning, The New York Times brought
us another breathtaking exposé of classified national security information that is really important for the public to know because...
um, well, because they just kind of felt like it. The story is about a contractor for an international shipping company who
was captured and held hostage by rebels in Yemen before being released last year. Without the man's permission or cooperation,
The New York Times gives details of his capture and imprisonment, his name, his age, his exact job description with the
shipping company, and the location where his wife and children lived at the time (none of which I will repeat here). [...] The
whole report is inexplicable, and you get the sense that the reporters just wanted to tell a splashy, thriller-like story.
Except that there's a larger pattern: it has become acceptable to open the floodgates of classified information because Trump.
The News Is Propaganda.
Non-stop distractions are deliberately used by those in power as instruments of policy for the purpose of preventing people from paying
attention to reality. Propaganda is used by those in power to manipulate language, thought, and opinion in a way that causes the
progression from thought to action artificially. When the public is reduced to a state where people no longer care about the
truth and are unaware of what that truth even is, propaganda takes hold and shows them what to do. [...] Under the conditions in
which we find ourselves living crisis to crisis, there can be no thought as the steady stream of propaganda is fed to us in the form
of "news" that never strays from a certain narrative.
The
Anonymous Sources Of Washington Post And CNN Fake News. Media fake news is everywhere. No, the new health care bill
does not treat rape as a pre-existing condition and Republicans did not celebrate its passage with beer. The latest media outrage
is driven by a Washington Post story about intelligence disclosures based on claims by anonymous sources. The Post's big hit pieces
are mainly based on anonymous sources. Its latest hit piece runs a quote from, "a former senior U.S. official who is close to current
administration officials." That's an anonymous source quoting hearsay from other anonymous sources. This isn't journalism.
It's a joke.
Anonymous
Nation: America's Papers of Record Have Turned into Tabloids. Donald Trump made a name for himself in
part by regularly appearing on the cover of New York City tabloids in the 1980s and 1990s. Fast forward to 2017, and
the guy is now president, still appearing on the cover of various grocery store check-out scandal sheets — like
the New York Times and the Washington Post. Journalists from these institutions conduct their reporting
like they're covering Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie's divorce.
Hysteria, overblown
hooey part of the fake news cycle. Turns out Mr. Trump is a germaphobe and wasn't in that Russian hotel
room. The bust of Martin Luther King is still in the Oval Office. He didn't abandon conservatives by naming his
sister to the Supreme Court. Mr. Trump's Tower — and people involved in his campaign — were,
in fact, surveilled. Slowly, agonizingly, Truth becomes very inconvenient for all these people predicting
Mr. Trump's certain demise. In the end, they are all left clinging to the smallest Styrofoam shard of their
original story, bobbing in the harsh sea of Donald Trump Derangement Syndrome.
How
many buzzwords can the liberal media write in one sentence? I was reading a very poorly written Los Angeles Times article about North
Carolina legislators introducing a bill to define marriage as between a man and a woman, and I was surprised to read the following sentence:
["]Opponents of the legislation castigated it as an unnecessary step that will stoke division in a state still reeling from
the fallout of a controversial bill regulating which bathrooms transgender people can use.["] I have rarely seen a sentence
so sensationalistically, so chock-full of so many liberal buzzwords. The over-dramatization of facts makes this news article read
like an action thriller.
Trump's Budget is an Attack
On the Bureaucratic State. So according to journalists, Donald Trump's proposed budget cuts are "big," "deep," "dramatic," "massive,"
and so on. With each breathless adjective — often coupled with excellent verbs like "gut" and "slash" — they add to the
apocalypticism that's engulfed the Left. "Reading through the Trump budget," tweeted The New York Times' Nicholas Kristof, "I
feel as the Romans must have felt in 456 AD as the barbarians conquered and ushered in the dark ages." Vox claimed that the
budget plan is a proposal to "dramatically remake the federal government." If only. In perspective, all of this melodrama
is over probably less than 1 percent of the national budget.
Fake
News Frenzy — Remember the Great Black Church Burning Hoax? The recent "fake news" about bomb
threats at Jewish Community Centers and desecration of Jewish cemeteries recalls a much earlier chapter in the history of
Fake News — the Black Church Burnings of the 1990s. Bomb threats phoned in to Jewish Community Centers
across the country caused a spasm of "Trump is not denouncing these fast enough" tweets. At around the same time, there
were multiple cases of reported desecration of Jewish cemeteries, including the toppling of tombstones. All this was
presumed to be part of an imagined Trump Effect: [...] When Trump suggested that some of these might be typical Hate Hoaxes,
he was denounced for that, too. Well, it turned out that many bomb threats could be traced to one black disgruntled
reporter (Juan Thompson) who was attempting to lay the blame on his white girlfriend.
ICE
Calls Out CNN, NBC, Etc., For "False, Dangerous & Irresponsible" Fake News Reporting. President Trump told a
gathering of news media yesterday, namely the Mainstream Media that is not accustomed to having its status questioned, that
they were constantly perpetrating fakes news to create an intended reaction from the American people. ICE, the nation's
largest immigration enforcement agency, just did the very same thing, calling out the media for its fabricated/highly slanted
coverage of recent immigration raids and reminding everyone that under previous administration these raids were far more
numerous — and the media then said NOTHING.
ICE:
Raid reports fake news, Obama grabbed 350% more. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is pushing back hard
on media reports that President Trump has unleashed a mean-spirited national raid on immigrants, noting that it rounded up
over 350 percent more during one sweep under former President Obama. In a series of tweets, ICE called the reports, in
the Washington Post and elsewhere, "dangerous and irresponsible." The agency this week said that had made 683 arrests
of mostly criminal illegal immigrants, or those with multiple cases against them beyond illegally crossing the border.
NBC
News Spreads Fear, Lies With "Ghost Gun" Fake News. Here's the thing: former ATF agent Rick Vasquez and Jeff
Rossen are boldly and directly lying to the viewers/readers of NBC News. I know this from firsthand experience, as I've
built semi-automatic firearms from the ground up, including AR-15s and an AKM. You cannot buy "all the parts" for any
firearm online and simply slap the pieces together to build a functioning firearm as they mislead viewers, and this is a very
easy claim to debunk. Every firearm made or imported into the United States has a part of the frame or receiver that
the ATF recognizes as the actual firearm that carries the serial number. All the other pieces are just parts.
Iceberg
Story, Slim. In the post-November 8 universe, one man's fake news is another man's vitally important
scoop. The third-most emailed article in today's [2/7/2017] New York Times is surely both things depending on
who's reading it. [...] Here's the gist of it: A crack is growing in the Larson C Ice Shelf, "in an area already
vulnerable to warming temperatures" and may soon create a very large iceberg. [...] This is literally a story about an
iceberg that could form — and then do no appreciable damage. And lest you think there's any new
information here, the Times reports that scientists have been monitoring the thing since 2014.
NBC's
Holt Lectures Viewers on the Meaning of the Statue of Liberty. With the debate over the legality of President
Donald Trump's immigration and travel ban still raging Monday evening [1/30/2017], NBC broadcasted their Nightly News program
"from the shadow of the Statue of Liberty" accompanied by a lecture from anchor Lester Holt. [...] But neither ABC nor CBS
treated it as a time to seemingly pontificate about the morality of the issue, let alone march out to the Statue of Liberty
and use it as a prop.
Trump's Reassertion of Common
Sense is a shattering experience for death-wish liberals, bishops, and RINOs. The grandstanding hysteria over
Trump's travel ban on people coming from seven terrorist countries falls into the category of sound and fury signifying
nothing, save the persistence of death-wish liberalism in our politics. It happened so "abruptly," harrumphed the
chattering class. Really? Trump has only been talking about the ban for over a year. People in those
countries had since his victory in November time to "prepare" for it. Besides, since when has it been a constitutional
right for peoples residing in terrorist hotbeds to travel inconvenience-free to America?
The
Famed 'Doomsday Clock' Is More Like A Liberal Angst Meter. When the Doomsday Clock launched in 1947, the
initial setting was seven minutes to midnight. Since then, it's gone up and down. The furthest it got from
doomsday was 17 minutes in 1991. The closest was 2 minutes to midnight in 1953. But it's clear
from its movements over the past seven decades that the Doomsday Clock is more about politics than any sort of scientific
measure of the risk of global nuclear war. After all, it has routinely counted down after a Republican wins the White
House, and ticked up when Democrats reclaim the presidency.
Grasping
for Metaphor, Reporters Flock to Burning DC Garbage Can. As chance would happen, many of the people upset by
the presidency of Donald Trump took to the streets of Washington today [1/20/2017] to express their displeasure with the new
administration. Shortly after Trump was sworn in, a large march organized by the DisruptJ20 protest group set out from
Union Station to McPherson Square, where it is holding a large rally. When the march passed by 13th and K streets,
Northwest, some in in the demonstration broke away and started throwing newspaper boxes, garbage cans, and other objects in
middle of K Street and set them on fire, using Trump T-shirts as kindling. And as any event involving the combination
of garbage, fire, and a large crowd — coupled with its convenient location right outside the office of a major news
organization — does, the small blaze caught the attention of seemingly every reporter within sprinting distance.
No,
Trump's Dismissal of Obama's Ambassadors Is Not an Unprecedented Crisis. President-elect Donald Trump's order
for all politically-appointed ambassadors to leave their overseas posts by Inauguration Day is "breaking with decades of
precedent by declining to provide even the briefest of grace periods," according to the New York Times.
The Election Was Not Hacked. Despite the
histrionic claims of the press, the election was not hacked. The Democratic National Committee's lousy IT security allowed someone
to access their emails which were then leaked. Clinton's campaign manager John Podesta fell for an age-old phishing scam that was
as believable as getting millions of dollars from a Nigerian prince. Using the spotty media understanding of cybersecurity, they can
claim that the DNC and Hillary's campaign were "hacked," but the election decisively was not. And the press knows it.
In order to "hack" an election, a nefarious group would have to inltrate the voting systems of 50 states, plus DC and territories.
All of these systems are unique, with completely different architecture, ballot formats, tabulation processes, etc., etc. This did not
happen. In fact, some hackers tried breaking into a few different states' systems weeks before the election, were quickly identied,
and prevented from doing so.
'Russian hackers' penetrate
US power grid with 'outdated Ukrainian malware'. A Vermont utility sounded the alarm after finding malware code
on a laptop that the FBI and DHS had touted as associated with Russian hackers. However, cybersecurity specialists say
the code came from an outdated Ukrainian hacking tool.
The Editor says...
This is one of the biggest mountains ever made out of a newsroom molehill. Utility companies don't transact their business or
control the power grid with laptop computers. In any event, the presence of malware on one computer doesn't mean that any other
computer was affected — or even the one with malware. This story is a whole lot of nothing, probably intended to make Russia
look like a villain, at a time when president-elect Trump is showing he's far more capable of dealing with Russia than Barack H.
Obama ever was.
Russian
Hacking Malware Found on Vermont Utility Computer. Malware associated with Russian hackers was found on a
computer belonging to a utility company in Vermont, according to the company. After being alerted last night by the
Department of Homeland Security about malware code used in Grizzly Steppe, Russia's hacking campaign against U.S. political
institutions, Burlington Electric Department performed a scan, the utility said in a statement. "We acted quickly to
scan all computers in our system for the malware signature. We detected the malware in a single Burlington Electric
Department laptop not connected to our organization's grid systems," the statement said. "We took immediate action to
isolate the laptop and alerted federal officials of this finding."
Washington
Post Publishes False News Story About Russians Hacking Electrical Grid. The [Washington] Post [12/30/2016] story was titled, "Russian
hackers penetrated U.S. electricity grid through a utility in Vermont, officials say." The story said, "A code associated with the Russian
hacking operation dubbed Grizzly Steppe by the Obama administration has been detected within the system of a Vermont utility, according to U.S.
officials." The Post published the story before being able to get comment from the two utility companies in Vermont. The Burlington
Electric Department would end up putting out a statement showing the premise of The Washington Post story as being untrue.
Update: Wait,
Never Mind, Russia's Not Trying to Destroy Vermont After All. Hey, remember that ominous Washington Post story
about Russia hacking a Vermont electrical company, and the scary warnings from Vermont Democrats that Vladimir Putin was
attempting to shut down the grid in the middle of winter? This morning [1/3/2017] the Post reports, "Whoops!"
Vt.
utility not specifically targeted for hack, official says. Federal investigators have found no information
suggesting this city's electric utility was specifically targeted after Burlington officials found malicious software linked
to Russian hackers on a department laptop, the utility's general manager said Saturday [12/31/2016]. Evidence of Internet
traffic associated with Grizzly Steppe, a notorious Russian distributor of malware, was disturbing but did not pose a threat
to Burlington Electric Department's highly computerized grid or its customers, said Neale Lunderville, general manager of the
city-owned utility. The stealth software, isolated on the one laptop, was discovered Friday [12/30/2016] as part of
ongoing routine vigilance.
The
Great Hacking of Vermont's Electrical Grid That Never Happened. For starters, the computer that had the malware
was an employee's laptop, and it was never connected to the Vermont electrical grid itself. Vermont had not been
specifically targeted, and the Post's original headline — "Russian hackers penetrated U.S. electricity grid
through a utility in Vermont, U.S. officials say" — was false. The statement from Burlington Electric Department
General Manager Neale F. Lunderville not-so-subtly urges the media covering this news to get their facts straight: [...]
Washington
Post corrects story on Vermont utility breach. The Washington Post has corrected a story that originally said
Russian hackers penetrated the U.S. electric grid by breaching a utility company in Vermont. "An earlier version of
this story incorrectly said that Russian hackers had penetrated the U.S. electric grid. Authorities say there is no
indication of that so far. The computer at Burlington Electric that was hacked was not attached to the grid," an
editor's note attached to the original article said. The original story was published Friday, one day after the Obama
administration announced new sanctions against Russia for its cyber activities.
Washington
Post retracts story about Russian hack at Vermont utility. The Washington Post has retracted its story about
Russian hackers penetrating the nation's electricity grid with a virus found in a Burlington, Vt., electric company
laptop. "Authorities say there is no indication of that so far [that Russians had penetrated the US electric grid],"
according to an editor's note attached to a corrected version of the story on the paper's website. "The computer at
Burlington Electric that was hacked was not attached to the grid," the editor's note read.
The
Scourge of Dumb News. Media is a product. Firms that provide this product are servicing a need, and we'd
only be kidding ourselves to claim news consumers desire only to be informed. This isn't a matter of simple bias
confirmation. News outlets have begun to cater not just to partisans but the minimally informed for whom fleeting and
shareable controversies provide a sense of feeling informed. [...] "Fake news" is a real problem, but it attracts a credulous
audience because news consumers have been primed to expect emotional satisfaction from the news.
12
Fake News Stories from the Mainstream Media. [For example,] Dateline NBC rigs a truck to explode:
In 1993, NBC News delivered a historic public apology for staging the test crash of a General Motors pickup truck for the
Dateline NBC program. The reporters wanted to demonstrate that gas could leak from the truck's fuel tank and
cause a dangerous fire after a crash, so they rigged it with explosives. [...] Dateline NBC was far from the only
example of dubious product-safety reporting. It wasn't even the first time a vehicle was rigged to explode for a major
network consumer report.
Amanpour:
Media Should Fight Trump Because He Might Start Putting Us In Cages. CNN's chief international correspondent
Christiane Amanpour urged journalists Tuesday night to protect their profession from the "existential threat" of President-elect
Donald Trump, who she implied might try to put the media in "cages." Citing Trump's tweet about the media "inciting" some
of the protests against him following the election, Amanpour warned gravely of authoritarian leaders who dismantle the free
press and imprison journalists.
Corporate
Media Berating Fake News Should Look In Mirror. The corporate media has been abuzz recently about the surge of
fake news stories tainting our digital ether, cautioning consumers against being conned by those pushing fantastical
falsehoods online. The glaring problem with this: the messenger. As reflective as the Democratic (and
Republican) establishment should be in the aftermath of the Trump-nado that swept itself into the White House, the elites in
our media should be looking themselves in the mirror morning, noon, and night, perhaps more than any other institution in the
U.S. Complacent for decades in a system of its own tone-deaf creation, political media elites have long operated by
chasing the "horse race" of he-said, she-said politics — or in Trump's case, he-tweeted, she-tweeted.
Trump
Sticks with People Who Stuck by Him, Media Bewildered. As soon as the news broke that President-elect Trump had
named Stephen Bannon as his chief strategist, the media began acting as if he'd just freed Charles Manson and given him the
launch codes. After helping Trump win in states where Republicans have sought nothing but moral victories for decades,
Bannon seemed like a perfectly logical choice to keep close in an advisory capacity.
The Misinformation Age. Consumers of mass media are not seeking to be informed,
because they assume it is all nonsense. They just want to be entertained. It's probably why Trump is one nominee and Clinton is the other.
Everyone is looking forward to the brash bully tearing into the corrupt old cow. It may be awful for the country, but it will make good TV.
Obama's legacy: Dead cops.
[Scroll down] For one thing, if Obama did his homework at all, he would know that what appears to be an explosion of
killings-by-police is actually just an explosion of media hype on the rare occasions when it happens, often without any of
the context that would help people explain why a certain thing happened. A responsible president would urge people to
wait for the facts and recognize that even though they can make mistakes, police officers have dangerous, difficult and
crucially important job such that they do not deserve to be painted with a broad brush as a bunch of racists.
CNN's
Liberal Meltdown: Brexit Means 'Xenophobia,' 'White Identity' Win. Liberal CNN anchor Christiane Amanpour
suffered an epic meltdown on Thursday night [6/23/2016] as it became clear that Britain was asserting its national
sovereignty and voting to leave the European Union. The sneering Amanpour repeatedly derided it as an example of
"xenophobia" and "white identity" politics. Early in the evening, with the result still in doubt, Amanpour told
Anderson Cooper: "A lot of the Leave movements are led by the hard-right, very, very xenophobic, anti-immigrant, very
populist, nationalist, white identity politics." Later, as reality set in, the journalist referenced the current issue of
The Economist and raged, "This marks a victory for the kind of economic nationalism, to quote this article here, for
the kind of xenophobia, that will imperil the liberal world order that has guaranteed western prosperity and stability since
World War II."
'This
is the end': Media hysterical over Brexit. Reporters around the world were left terrified, heartbroken and
angry over the vote in the United Kingdom to withdraw from the European Union. "No words. The dream is
over. Britain has voted to fall into the sea. This is the end," Fusion's Felix Salmon opined on social
media. "I despair. This is not my England." "I feel like there's been a death in the family.
There needs to be some kind of funeral," he added.
My
Shared Shame: The Media Helped Make Trump. Those of us in the news media have sometimes blamed Donald Trump's
rise on the Republican Party's toxic manipulation of racial resentments over the years. But we should also acknowledge
another force that empowered Trump: Us. I polled a number of journalists and scholars, and there was a broad (though not
universal) view that we in the media screwed up. Our first big failing was that television in particular handed Trump the
microphone without adequately fact-checking him or rigorously examining his background, in a craven symbiosis that boosted audiences
for both.
Hillary's
Really Bad Week No One Heard About because Guess Who. Hillary Clinton had a gaffe-filled, staggeringly bad week
last week. It started with her politicizing Nancy Reagan's funeral and ending with more explosive allegations that her
informal adviser Sidney Blumenthal had directly cut and pasted classified intelligence into an unsecured personal e-mail
account. But you wouldn't know it from media campaign coverage, which has been far more occupied with the GOP primary
and the escalation of violent incidents at rallies.
Of Course
Whites Commit Most Of The Crime In Fargo You Idiots. It's time for another fantastically stupid "exclusive"
news story from the folks at Fargo-based television news station Valley News Live. Their big revelation? White
people commit most of the crime in Fargo. A city where, according to the U.S. Census, is 90.2 percent white.
The myth of the cop killing
'epidemic'. To hear the media tell it, America is in the grip of an unprecedented crime wave, an orgy of wanton
murder in which heavily armed thugs randomly gun down innocent unarmed people, some of them teens, just for sport.
Except that these homicidal goons are wearing the blues and badges of American police departments. It's the narrative
that's given rise to the protest movement Black Lives Matter and to a growing public mistrust of the police in general.
From Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo., to the recent shooting of a middle-aged woman and a teen in Chicago, the body count seemingly
keeps rising, exacerbating racial tensions and keeping the nation on edge. And each incident is breathlessly reported by a
media determined to show that America remains deeply, irredeemably racist. Problem is, it's simply not true.
5
Devastating Facts About Black-on-Black Crime. The mainstream American media is, again, happily hitting the
Black Lives Matter crack pipe in its pernicious pursuit of high ratings. [...] [T]he ugly truth behind #BlackLivesMatter is
that black people killing other black people does nothing to advance its political power in the same way that one white cop
killing a black criminal can. Despite the media's overindulgence on white cops killing blacks, there is still a far-larger amount
of black bodies being sent to morgues by black killers. Here's five devastating facts, liberals can't deny, that prove it.
The
System Worked, So Why The Protests In Chicago? The truth is the awful death is demeaned by another outbreak of
the nation's protest industry, one that unfortunately doesn't move itself overseas. The telling tip-off is the presence of
Jesse Jackson. Or Al Sharpton. And protest leaders' choice of target, in this case a nationally familiar tourist area
that — Oh, look! — is handy to all the local TV newsrooms. And it piggybacks on a traditionally slow
news day's fascination with holiday shoppers. A perfect public-relations storm for protesters.
Don't Believe the Media! You must keep
in mind that the media industry is exactly that; an industry. They must make greater and greater profits to satisfy their
stockholders. Dramatic reports of a child that is shot by another child increase ratings much more than reporting that
28 women used a gun to fight off rape today and every day, for that matter (the national average). A heart rending image
of a mother who just lost a child to a drive-by shooting drives ratings much higher than a dry report that violent crime is down
in states with the least amount of gun control. The simple fact is that violence sells! [...] Splashier news makes
for more profit. You can't blame someone for wanting to make more money, even if you disagree with how they do it.
So, it is imperative that you remember that those in control of the media have their own agenda and that agenda does NOT serve YOUR
best interest. Since violence sells and legal unrestricted gun ownership reduces violence, it is in the media's business
interest to promote restrictions on legal gun ownership.
Media Coverage Foments
Copycat Suicides, Including Mass-Shooter Suicides. Earlier this year, the deranged 26-year-old gunman who snuffed out the
lives of nine innocent human beings before taking his own life on the campus of Umpqua Community College provided some real insight into
the minds of the young men involved in what is a disturbing — and growing — trend in America: mass-shooter
suicides. And that's what these are, these mass shootings. They are suicides that would not be big national stories without
a body count that included innocents killed in movie theaters, churches, schools. And, to judge from the shooter's words, they are
mass shootings that might not have happened at all had there been no prospect of mass-media coverage.
No, You Do Not Have to Drink 8 Glasses
of Water a Day. If there is one health myth that will not die, it is this: You should drink eight glasses of water a day.
It's just not true. There is no science behind it. And yet every summer we are inundated with news media reports warning that dehydration
is dangerous and also ubiquitous. These reports work up a fear that otherwise healthy adults and children are walking around dehydrated,
even that dehydration has reached epidemic proportions. Let's put these claims under scrutiny.
The
Plight of the Unarmed Perp. This is the point I really want to make: the constant
emphasis on police shootings of unarmed men that we see in the press is, for the most part, crazy.
If you are a perp, or a suspect, or an inoffensive person walking down the street, you may be unarmed, but
the police officer is not. Nor, in most cases, will he have any immediate way to know whether
you are armed or not. If you attack him, what do you expect him to do? Challenge you to an
arm-wrestling match? He is entitled to use deadly force to defend himself. Attacking a police
officer rarely ends well. Likewise with fleeing a police officer who is ordering you to stop.
If there is a problem here, it does not demand a thorough revamping of American police practices.
Rather, it suggests that those who have influence with a small demographic group — 6% of the
population, according to the Post — impress upon them that they should not attack police officers
under any circumstances, and if told to stop, they should stop. If they put their hands up,
they are not going to get shot.
Priceless
Liberal reactions to allegedly violent black burglar shot by police. We don't know all
the facts. Maybe he fought with the cops and they shot him in self defense. Maybe he didn't fight at
all and they still shot him. What we do know, however, is that he rammed a dealership with his car
and started to deface the cars in the lot. He wasn't shot walking home from the library; he was
shot while committing an act of violence and destruction of property.
Police
Fatally Shoot Unarmed College Football Player. Officers were responding to a burglary
call about 1 a.m. Friday [8/7/2015] in Arlington when they discovered someone had driven a vehicle
through a front window of the Classic Buick GMC, according to a statement from the Arlington Police
Department. The statement said police approached the suspect and a struggle ensued. At
some point during the struggle, an officer shot Taylor.
The Editor says...
Why is the perpetrator identified, every time this story comes up, as a football player? What difference does it make if he plays
football? He certainly wasn't playing football in the closed showroom of a car dealership well after midnight. The clear
implication is that the liberal press considers football players to be on a plane above all others.
In
Zimbabwe, We Don't Cry for Lions. When I turned on the news and discovered that the
messages were about a lion killed by an American dentist, the village boy inside me instinctively
cheered: One lion fewer to menace families like mine. My excitement was doused when I realized
that the lion killer was being painted as the villain. I faced the starkest cultural contradiction
I'd experienced during my five years studying in the United States. Did all those Americans signing
petitions understand that lions actually kill people? That all the talk about Cecil being "beloved"
or a "local favorite" was media hype?
Nets
Spend 30 Minutes on Lion; Censor Abortion Videos. The broadcast news shows covered Cecil the lion
more in one day than they spent on the Planned Parenthood videos in two weeks — and that discrepancy
only continues to grow. In two days, ABC, NBC and CBS have spent 30 minutes, 1 second on Cecil, a
famed African lion shot by an American dentist. But anchors couldn't spare nearly as much time for the videos
exposing Planned Parenthood's harvesting of aborted baby parts. Since the release of the Center for Medical
Progress' first video two weeks ago, the networks have spent only 11 minutes, 13 seconds on the story.
World
Explodes over Dead Lion, Ignores Planned Parenthood. On Tuesday [7/28/2015], the world lost its collective
mind — whatever is left of it, anyway — when media discovered the identity of the killer of a Zimbabwean
named Cecil. Cecil is a lion. Cecil, a lion, was by most accounts "one of Africa's most famous lions." Cecil,
incredibly, was famous for being a lion, not for curing cancer, although you wouldn't know that by the media coverage.
The man who shot Cecil, a lion, to death is Dr. Walter Palmer, a big game hunter who allegedly paid $55,000 for a big game
permit. He hired a guide, who lured Cecil, a lion, out from a protected area, where Cecil, a lion, then met his end.
The
War on Black People in South Carolina: the First Casualty is Truth. Mass murder was not enough. Not for the army of reporters
who soon after the South Carolina killings surrounded this truth with a bodyguard of lies. The shooting was part of a pattern of white on
black violence wildly out of proportion, journalists told us over and over. The tragedy also reminded many scribes of the so-called epidemic
of arson against black churches in the 1990s. Neither of which are true.
If
You're Going To Fake A Rape, Remember To Take Off Your Fitbit. Technology can be a useful tool for the
rape hoaxer, but inevitably it leads to the hoaxer's downfall. Social media can catapult a mattress-carrying
liar all the way to the State of the Union Address, but then her text-message record can show her for the fraud she
is. (And if she subsequently decides to post amateur porn online, well... ) A once-respected
magazine can put a rape hoaxer in the headlines, but then a handful of bloggers questioning the story can bring
it all crashing down.
ABC's
'08 Prediction: NYC Under Water from Climate Change By June 2015. New York City underwater? Gas over $9 a
gallon? A carton of milk costs almost $13? Welcome to June 12, 2015. Or at least that was the wildly-inaccurate
version of 2015 predicted by ABC News exactly seven years ago. Appearing on Good Morning America in 2008, Bob Woodruff
hyped Earth 2100, a special that pushed apocalyptic predictions of the then-futuristic 2015. The segment included
supposedly prophetic videos, such as a teenager declaring, "It's June 8th, 2015. One carton of milk is $12.99." (On
the actual June 8, 2015, a gallon of milk cost, on average, $3.39.) Another clip featured this prediction for the
current year: "Gas reached over $9 a gallon." (In reality, gas costs an average of $2.75.)
Media
distorts Bibi's statements, then claims he's walking them back. The distortion of
Benjamin Netanyahu's pre-election statements on a two-state solution and Arab voting was a classic
Obama and media distortion. If you take the actual text of Netanyahu said, he never ruled out a
two-state solution and never discouraged Arab voting. But those were the headlines and the
foaming-at-the mouth hyperbole, fomented by the Obama administration in numerous anonymous statements
to the media.
58,000
children 'abducted' a year: yet another fishy statistic. [Scroll down] In other
words, these numbers come from an era that predates the wide use of mobile phones, which allow
parents to keep much closer track of their children, or the creation of the Amber alerts (which are
also on phones, in Facebook news feeds and so forth). There is an update in the works but the
results will not be released until sometime later this year. So, first off, you see this is an
estimate, based on a survey, not based on actual incidents. NBC News claimed this was FBI data,
which makes it sound like actual reports, but instead this was simply derived from a study conducted
by academicians for the Justice Department.
NBC
Devotes Nearly Four Minutes to Dress Debate, Seconds to Clinton Corruption. On Friday
[2/27/2015], NBC finally noticed the corruption scandal swirling around Hillary Clinton. However,
the coverage on the Today show was relegated to a 49-second mention within a story slamming
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker. By contrast, the morning show devoted 3 minutes
56 seconds to a social media debate about the color of a dress.
Another
Bogus Academic Study Creates Bogus Headlines. Thanks to the Washington Post, we
have new entry in what is surely the fastest-growing industry in academia: bogus studies that purport to
show there is no difference between black and white rates of crime. [...] This latest headline from the
Post tells a shocking story: "Black teens who commit a few crimes go to jail as often as white
teens who commit dozens." Or it would be shocking if it were true. But it is not.
Reporter
is Maced After Storming a Police Station with Protesters. If you run with radicals,
expect to be treated like them. You storm a police headquarters and you get maced for being part of
the mob. Oh, boo hoo! This reporter should not have expected anything less.
He's lucky he didn't get shot.
CBS:
Voter ID Laws Are Like Violent Attacks on Blacks at Selma. The journalists at CBS
This Morning on Monday [12/15/2014] compared the violent, bloody attacks on African Americans
during civil rights marches in 1965 to voter ID laws passed by various states in the last few years.
The
great campus rape hoax. Americans have been living through an enormously sensationalized college rape hoax, but as the
evidence accumulates it's becoming clear that the entire thing was just a bunch of media hype and political opportunism. No,
I'm not talking about the Rolling Stone's lurid and now-exploded fraternity gang-rape story. Whatever the truth behind
that story, it's now clear that basically nothing that Rolling Stone reporter Sabrina Rubin Erdely told us happened, actually
happened. But the hoax is much bigger than one overwrought and perhaps entirely fictional tale of campus goings-on.
Hysterical Media Tell Us to Calm Down.
In the past week, The New York Times has ridiculed Gov. Andrew Cuomo and Gov. Chris Christie for
having "fed panic" by ordering quarantines for health workers arriving from Ebola-plagued countries.
[...] I haven't noticed any panic. If you want panic, review media coverage of the police shooting
in Ferguson, Missouri. That hair-on-fire coverage was based entirely, it turns out, on the media's
gullibly swallowing inaccurate accounts of the incident. For decades liberals have terrified
soccer moms about a slew of imaginary terrors: global warming, Alar on apples, breast implants,
heterosexual AIDS, nuclear war, and Republicans taking away their birth control.
Ebola
and the Media's Multiple Personality Disorder. While The Daily Mail suggests
that terrorists could transform the virus into a weapon, The Daily Beast declares that the
"Ebola Panic Is Worse Than the Disease." Fox raises the specter of illegal immigrants bringing the
virus over the border, and MSNBC assures us that the authorities have things in hand. One outlet
asks an author of medical thrillers to speculate about the ways the threat might mutate into something
more frightening; another declares that we're watching an "epic, epidemic overreaction." Wait,
sorry: Did I say that was "another" outlet? Actually, those last two both came from CNN.
Media
Should Stop Lecturing Americans About Their Ebola Concerns. The very moment that the
news was confirmed about Dr. Ebola, various reporters started telling everyone to calm down. But
nobody was panicking. I mean, expressing interest in an unbelievably deadly disease that has spread
quickly is not panicking. Panicking is loading up your car like a prepper who just won the Lottery
and heading to your cabin in West Virginia. I mean, maybe there's someone who has done just that.
But there is no evidence that we have any serious problem with people panicking.
Race-Baiting
CNN Falls For Another Trayvonesque Hoax. Desperate to frame the shooting death of Michael Brown in racial terms, CNN has bitten
hard on what appears to be faked evidence. The network did the same thing during the Trayvon Martin case.
Ebola
Optics and Questionable MSM Smiley Narratives. Conservatives can be forgiven if, after
having carefully reflected upon a sampling of MSM Ebola narratives, they conclude that something
seems a bit askew. Certain optics and associated stories appear to put a giant smiley face
on the Ebola situation. Nothing to worry about here. Move along. However, certain
omissions raise troubling questions in regard to what we have been told — especially when
the omissions are conjoined with scientific findings on Ebola. [...] The MSM is obviously populated
by many people whose mouths are as big as their brains are tiny. It is therefore no surprise
that many such people do not know how to recognize when a question is really statistical in nature
and, if it is, how to analyze it.
About
That 'World-Ending' Solar Storm... News of a devastating solar storm 'just missing'
Earth in 2012 made the rounds last week. Turns out that storm was nowhere near us, and similar
storms have happened before.
Taliban
sets oil tankers on fire in Afghanistan. Television footage showed black
smoke billowing above the site of the attack, with the charred wreckage of dozens of trucks
scattered around a vast parking space. The Taliban claimed responsibility for the attack,
saying the trucks carried fuel intended for U.S.-led NATO forces.
The Editor says...
The sensational headline would lead most readers to believe that somebody had set fire to two or more ocean-going oil
tankers. In reality, only a few thousand gallons of oil — in ordinary trucks — appear
to be involved.
U.S.
passenger jet nearly collided with drone in March: FAA. An American Airlines Group Inc aircraft
almost collided with a drone above Florida earlier this year, a near-accident that highlights the growing risk
from rising use of unmanned aircraft, the U.S. air safety regulator said.
The Editor says...
Don't be deceived by the sensational headline. It was a small plane, a small drone, no collision, very small story.
Barbara
Walters is TV personality, not a journalist. Walters broke into the media business as a behind-the-scenes
writer at NBC, eventually working her way up to be co-host of "Today." She entered the network news world with no
journalistic credentials, a fact that bothered the grizzled news veterans of the day. She made history in 1976 when
ABC hired her to be the first woman to co-anchor a network evening newscast. The gimmick of hiring a "Today" host
to do a serious newscast never worked. Walters had built her career as a morning gabber, and that didn't translate
to the serious news anchor desk.
Dateline
producer suing NBC. Women working at NBC's Dateline show are regularly asked to pose as 'sexual bait'
for stories about prostitution, sex trafficking, and sexual deviants according to a female producer who is now suing
the network. New York-based Kimberly Lengle, 33, says she quit the program last April after a senior HR director
failed to follow-up on her complaints about the practice.
Logic Gets Sucked into the Polar
Vortex. North America is presently experiencing the kind of abnormally cold temperatures that can wreak havoc on computer
climate models. The mainstream media is overflowing with headlines about coldness raging unexpectedly across Canada in January,
Jack Frost nipping at people's noses, and other signs of the Apocalypse. Naturally, then, it was only a matter of time before
these media outlets — aka the global Ministry of Propaganda — let the other shoe drop, and explained how all
this routine winter weather is the result of man-made global warming, and therefore can only be halted by international totalitarianism.
Obama portrayed as victim. Some may think reporters and editors
are simply clumsy or indifferent writers, and sometimes they are. But much of the time they choose their words (and photos) with exquisite and subtle care.
They also realize that most people only look at the headlines and photos of most articles, and that those are therefore the most important elements, and
that even people who do read the article often read only the first few paragraphs.
The media war over George W. Bush's stent.
From Benghazi to the health of former President George W. Bush, wild unsubstantiated assertions by the news media take the place of real reporting.
Fox News is left to set the record straight, yet frequently it doesn't get the credit it deserves. The stent placement in President Bush's coronary
artery is the latest example of the world of Fox News versus wild speculation.
Media Coverage of Benghazi Leans Toward
Political Theater. First, we learned from the Obama Administration that it was a YouTube video that sparked the protests —
a false narrative gladly perpetuated by the media as long as possible. Currently, the media and the administration are pushing the story that
attempts to investigate Benghazi constitute a Republican vendetta, the perpetuation of a "phony scandal" to incite the populace against the President
and former Secretary of State — and presidential hopeful — Hillary Clinton. To this end, it is not surprising that key
details of the recent congressional hearings on Benghazi went largely unnoticed by the mainstream media.
Art Horn Letter to
Connecticut State Department of Agriculture. Hurricane Sandy was not a "Super Storm". This label was assigned by the news media.
Those who called Sandy a Super Storm did so because they liked the sound of "Super Storm." Having worked in television news rooms for 25 years
I am well acquainted with these exaggerations. The term "Super Storm Sandy" sounds much more dramatic than "Sandy is a category one Hurricane
on a scale of one to five" which is what it was.
Breaking News! Seventh First Climate
Refugees Discovered! BBC, your climate reporting is pathetic. Doesn't anyone there think to check up on some dewy-eyed reporter
gushing on about the tragic fate of the latest batch of pseudo-refugees? Missing the facts in this story would have been understandable a decade
ago, but in 2013, you guys are a running joke.
The Media's Moral Decline:
Standards, Story Selection Now Tabloids On Steroids. For those who don't live in New York and aren't familiar with the Daily News,
it should be noted that while it sometimes reads like a tabloid, it is a legitimate news source and is mentioned in the same breath as The News York
Times and New York Post one of the city's top newspapers. In fact, the Daily News has won ten Pulitzers and is the fourth-most
circulated newspaper in the United States. To that end, these headlines aren't too different than what we see dominating national or local cable
news today, and by extension (since we cover this stuff), Mediaite as well.
An Abortionist's Unglamorous
Victims. He's allegedly killed more people than Jeffrey Dahmer and John Wayne Gacy combined, but most Americans have never heard
of him. [...] We have wall-to-wall coverage of Jodi Arias, a lone nut who admits to killing her boyfriend in Arizona, but a blackout on Kermit
Gosnell. And why wouldn't we? The Arias trial involves nude pictures, kinky sex, and an attractive woman.
The
10 Absolute Worst Media Reactions To The Boston Marathon Bombings. In the media business, what's the one
thing you can consistently expect from reporters, pundits, "experts," and anchors on the day of a major news event?
Speculation. Wild, unabashed speculation. Oftentimes, their conjecture is based on their own political beliefs
and agendas. And this can lead to some particularly ugly comments while the wounds are still fresh during major
tragedies like the Newtown and Aurora massacres... and Monday's Boston marathon bombings.
The Media's Privacy War. Sensationalizing the news and
publicizing the story non-stop allows advertisers to count on human nature. The public tunes in and/or buys the newspaper.
Media networks bet that if you get hooked on the drama, the personalities of the reporters, you will keep watching or buying the particular
outlet for your news. High viewership and readership increases the likelihood of advertising sales. The media wages a privacy
war for money.
Woodward-Sperling
Flap May Turn Tide. The more superficial the brouhaha the bigger its impact. What public figures say is more important
than what they do, because cable TV and political blogs can cover a mud fight more cheaply and more easily than they can a real story.
Geraldo Rivera and Common Decency. There are those
who will dismiss Fox News personality Geraldo Rivera's announcement that he is considering running for the U.S. Senate in New Jersey in 2014 as a Republican as
just one more publicity stunt in a career replete with them. Rivera's public record is mixed, as it has combined serious advocacy on a number of issues
with the sort of foolish excess that has given a bad name to tabloid journalism. If people think of him more as a celebrity than a journalist, it is his
own fault and not something that he has seemed to mind very much.
The media love maniacs.
The same media that pointedly ignore frequent life-saving defensive uses of firearms consistently pours hours and days and weeks of attention
upon the latest maniac who chooses a firearm as his tool of mass murder, so that the next potential insane villain cannot fail to notice the
easy path to fame and immortality that the misuse of a gun can bring. But the greatest fame will only attach if they can beat the previous
body-count record, a number constantly and loudly broadcast, so that no one can fail to hear it. The message to the unstable is clear:
Come on, you crazy guys, can't you at least murder your way to thirty?
Newtown is the Latest Example of Media Overkill.
On behalf of all us, I beg the media: Please go away. Please stop cold calling my friends who live in Sandy Hook for potential news nuggets.
Please stop harassing people like my mother as they leave funerals. Please stop parking on people's lawns without permission.
CBS presents hype as news. Does anyone remember when CBS used to be a
respected news organization that did its own research — or at least quoted independent experts? Or even conducted interviews?
When it comes to health and science news, alas, it seems like they've been reduced to rewriting alarmist or sensationalist press releases.
A Tsunami of Exaggeration.
One of the current obsessions is how much debris from the tsunami in Japan last year — some of it possibly
radioactive!!! — will be washing ashore in North America. Usha Lee McFarling writes in the Los Angeles
Times that we should all calm down.
When 'Minority' is a Trick of
Definition. When the Census Bureau this month issued a press release headlined "Most Children Younger Than Age 1 are
Minorities," the media snapped to attention. News outlets nationwide covered the announcement, hailing it as a "historic demographic
milestone" (CNN), as the "dawn of an era in which whites no longer will be in the majority" (Washington Post), and as an "important turning
point for the nation" (McClatchy) that would "starkly ... change the face of America's next generations" (Time). None of that was
true. None of that was new, either.
Mike Wallace, Entertainment, and Journalism.
On the back nine, Mike liked to think of himself exclusively as a journalist. The network might have plucked him from daytime
television — but taking the shill out of the entertainer was another matter. Wallace was the quintessential barker, an
ambulance-chaser with press credentials. He perfected the art of "ambush" journalism at CBS. With such tactics, copy led only
when it bled. Indeed, Mike Wallace's career echoes some of the more predatory traditions of broadcast journalism.
Journalism's Eroding Integrity. The ABC News product increasingly
ceases to be journalism. It is sensationalism. It is reprehensible. It's time to let ABC News feel the sting of public disapproval.
Journalists don't have
good grasp of religion. Evidence of big media's bias against religion that doesn't advance the secular and liberal agenda of the
Democratic Party is beyond dispute. Any faith attached to a conservative agenda is to be ridiculed, stereotyped and misrepresented.
Islam is a notable exception. The media appear to bend over backward not to offend Muslims.
Upon Further Review?
How the media does love its monsters. The media got an early Christmas gift from Jerry Sandusky, who fills
the hideous monster vacuum that had developed after Osama Bin Laden was slain. How the media does love its
monsters. After Bin Laden, the monster niche was neatly filled by Dominique Strauss-Kahn (almost forgotten
now, relegated to media monster purgatory.) Prior to DSK we had folk villain Bernie Madoff, after which
Michael Vick's head was served to us on a platter. Prior to Vick came loony monster Mel Gibson, preceded
by Timothy McVeigh, the Unabomber and, to be sure, O.J. Simpson, a sort of monster emeritus. Qadaffi
was October monster of the month, giving way to Sandusky.
What is Poverty in the United States
Today? [Scroll down] Mainstream news media also present poverty in America as severe material
hardship. ... The ongoing use of examples of severe hardship in TV news should not be surprising. TV news
thrives on drama, and reporters naturally seek out the starkest and most sympathetic examples of poverty to build
the most compelling stories. By contrast, a realistic portrayal of the living conditions of the typical poor
family in America would not make compelling viewing. In fact, the audience would be unlikely to regard
such a family as seriously deprived.
Payday Loans. The
mindset of the left was recently displayed in a big, front-page story in the October 30th issue of the San Mateo
County Times. It was an investigative reporter's expose of the "payday loan" business and its lobbyists.
According to the reporter: "In California lenders charge up to $45 in fees on a maximum $300 loan.
This amounts to an interest rate of 460 percent, trapping some borrowers into a never-ending cycle of
debt." ... Using this kind of reasoning — or lack of reasoning — you could quote the price of
salmon as $15,000 a ton or say a hotel room rents for $36,000 a year, when no consumer buys a ton of salmon and
few people stay in a hotel room all year. It is clever propaganda, but do people buy newspapers to be
propagandized?
Jackie, Oh No. Is
there a more empathetic person in the world than Diane Sawyer, the top newsreader at ABC TV? I'm sure
there must be — around seven billion of them, probably. But is there anyone who looks more
empathetic than Diane Sawyer? Not a chance. When she peers at you through the camera she has the
look of someone who's just seen your lab results and is trying to figure out how to break the bad news.
The Editor says...
Bill Curtis of WBBM-TV has perfected the "phony concerned look".
Understanding
Poverty in the U.S. Poor Americans, on average, live in larger houses or apartments than does
the average, non-poor individual living in Sweden, France, Germany or the United Kingdom. The media cry
with alarm that "nearly one in four kids" in the nation are hungry. Again, government data show
otherwise. Fully 96 percent of poor parents stated that their children were never hungry at any
time during 2009, despite the severity of the recession, according to data from the U.S. Department of
Agriculture.
A Weather Newsgasm. [Scroll
down] The incessant "news" coverage reflects the way television (and print) news professionals tend to
regard viewers as too stupid to make decisions as basic as preparing for the hurricane or evacuating before
its arrival, nor do they just report the news, i.e., the facts. So far as Irene was concerned, they
engaged in massive speculation and endless predictions.
Here's an example of news media alarmism: Atop TV Sets, a Power Drain That Runs Nonstop.
Those little boxes that usher cable signals and digital recording capacity into televisions have become the
single largest electricity drain in many American homes, with some typical home entertainment configurations
eating more power than a new refrigerator and even some central air-conditioning systems. ... One
high-definition DVR and one high-definition cable box use an average of 446 kilowatt hours a year...
The Editor's rebuttal:
Do the math. 446 kWh a year, consumed by an appliance that runs 24 hours a day, is an
average power consumption of only 50 watts. Is that more power than your "central
air-conditioning system" uses? Nobody put a gun to your head and forced you to get a high-def DVR
and a cable box. If that's how you want to spend your money, that's your business.
Exploiting the Japanese.
For the left, no crisis is too terrible to go unused. So it is with the horrific suffering that has
taken place in Japan. ... In [an] appearance on the NBC Nightly News, Edward Lyman of UCS stressed
the ominous situation in Japan while at the same time stressing that "it can happen here." The
"safety bar is set too low," Lyman insisted. We need more restrictions — presumably
the sort that would slow down further nuclear power development or shut it down entirely. Suddenly,
the media was full of the "worse than Three Mile Island" scenario — the worst nuclear
catastrophe since Chernobyl. Come to think of it, has there been a nuclear "catastrophe" since
Chernobyl? Is the situation in Japan, however serious it may be, a Chernobyl-scale accident?
Not likely, but the media seems to be licking its lips, hoping it will come close.
Fear the Media Meltdown,
Not the Nuclear One. Relax: this is not another Chernobyl or Three Mile Island, and I'll
tell you exactly why. The only thing to fear is the sensationalist reporting that has the world panicked.
The Media's Deadly Sin.
Last year I was listening to the radio and heard that our area had experienced an earthquake during the night.
I took the reporter's word that it happened; it had been so mild that I slept right through it. In
December 1995, if one weren't visiting a national park or applying for a passport, the government shutdown had
the same impact as that earthquake. In other words, if it hadn't been for the media caterwauling, the
majority of us wouldn't have even known the shutdown had happened.
Journalists'
sob stories block reform. Now that budget battles have begun in earnest all around the country,
those advocating spending cuts, Democratic and Republican, had better not expect any help in furthering their
cause from the mainstream news media. In fact, the news media might be their most formidable foe.
How so? Well, now that we know the targets of the cuts, the news media, suckers for a sob story,
are already throbbing with carefully orchestrated, heart-rending tales about what devastation those cuts will
cause: Children who won't be fed; students unable to afford college; classrooms bursting at the seams;
cancers that will not be treated; trains that won't run; roads that won't be built; families becoming homeless
or freezing in their unheated homes; single mothers who will lose child care and job training; food that will
not be inspected; water and air that will be more polluted; farmers who will be forced from their land;
playgrounds, parks, museums, libraries and health clinics that will be closed. You know the drill.
The Toyota Death Panel. The
Toyota scare was just the latest in a long series of orchestrated crises, in the tradition of the Alar scam
of the 1980s, or DDT hysteria before that. It's very easy to provoke a media stampede against a large
corporation. The narrative plays into the anti-business biases of reporters, whose ears are hungry
for the distant cry of trumpets calling them to battle in a populist crusade.
The Anti-Cop Trend That Isn't.
[Scroll down] Dig into most of these articles, however, and you will find there is no real evidence of an
increase in anti-police violence, let alone one that can be traced to anti-police rhetoric, gun sales, disrespect
for authority, or "don't tread on me" sentiment. (CNN is one of the few media outlets that have covered
the purported anti-police trend with appropriate skepticism.) Amid all the quotes from concerned law
enforcement officials in MSNBC's "War on Cops" article, for example, is a casual mention that police fatality
statistics for this month are about the same as they were in January 2010.
The Media's Debacles. Without an
analysis of the significance of an event, the news becomes an arena in which to compete for attention and the
most outlandish, shocking, offensive or bizarre becomes "newsworthy". Competition for sensational news
is no less intense today than it was when the so-called "yellow press" in the United States, largely under the
control of editor William Randolph Hearst, found Spain guilty for the disaster of the sinking of the U.S.
battleship "Maine" in Havana harbor and provoked the Spanish-American War in 1898. ... A viewing audience
unequipped with basic background information is likely to take at face value the absurd, shocking and
grotesque if portrayed often enough and presented as "news".
IPCC Distortion Of Weather And Climate Is Reinforced
By Media Hyperbole. It's pathetic to watch the US mainstream media yearn for a hurricane, especially
one that will threaten people. They anxiously scan the weather maps off the coast of West Africa for any
low-pressure system that might develop into a news making, life threatening, normal event. It is another
measure of how the media is not about news but editorializing, speculation and sensationalism. Sadly,
they are joined in this or at least not dissuaded or counteracted by government agencies.
Jacksonian America. On
September 11th 2001, about an hour after the planes hit the twin towers, Jo Moore, a senior advisor to
Britain's Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions, turned away from the TV and
fired off a departmental e-mail: It's now a very good day to get out anything we want to bury.
I'm not sure where Ms Moore is these days, but June 25th and all the following week were even better
days to get out anything you want to bury. The House of Representatives passed the Waxman-Markey
"cap-and-trade" bill ... And nobody cared. Because Michael Jackson had died.
A pandemic of
panic — are we dead yet? We were all supposed to be in the graveyard by now, done in by AIDS,
SARS, bird flu, poisoned peanut butter, Hong Kong flu, killer tomatoes, global warming and strangulation by
kudzu. But here we are, proof that there really is life after death.
The Great Liberal
Pandemonium Machine. The Mexican swine flu pandemic? Oh, that's soooo yesterday.
Global Warming? All those confident "scientific" predictions are falling apart around the world, even
as greedy politicians still try to squeeze the last little drops of power and money out of them. Human
flesh-eating bacteria? SARS? Ozone holes? Mad Cow? The Curse of the Killer Tomatoes?
Water torture? CO2? Bee Colony Collapse? It never ends. As long as scare stories sell,
as long as millions of indoctrinated suckers fall for them they will never end.
After
salmonella, bird flu, the Millennium Bug... should we actually be scared this time? Don't we
have the sense that we have seen this kind of panic before, which eventually turned out to have gone way over
the top? The moment which more than any might have set off a severe attack of deja vu came when the
BBC Today programme wheeled on an expert from the World Health Organisation to tell us that '40 percent'
of us in Britain may catch swine flu — while another unnamed expert was quoted predicting
that '1.2 million' Britons could die.
Yellowcake and Yellow Journalism:
On MSNBC they're covering the [Scooter Libby] trial like it's the Normandy Invasion, starring Elvis Presley,
as told by Joseph Goebbels. MSNBC's "reportage" consists of endless repetition of arbitrary assertions,
half-truths and thoroughly debunked canards. No one else cares about the trial — except presumably
Scooter Libby — so the passionate left is allowed to invent a liberal fable without correction.
Yellow Science: Man has
always had a healthy desire for knowledge, and it is the feeding of this hunger that ennobles journalism.
Hearst and Pulitzer were acutely aware that man has a less healthy but no less voracious desire to believe that
he has knowledge, particularly knowledge of something sensational. It is the feeding of this hunger that
irreparably disgraced journalism, and a century later now threatens to do the same to science.
The Fog of Breaking News: Why you should take
reports from the scene of a massacre with a grain of salt.
Paris, Lindsay and A-Rod? We Don't Care!
Apparently, the causal relationship between the media's supply of celebrity gossip and the public's demand for
it is a two-way street. America's seemingly insatiable appetite for celebrity scandal is a troubling sign,
but here's an even more alarming truth: Our enemy — facing the most powerful military force
in history — has never concealed its belief that its ultimate triumph, as well as our ultimate
demise, will come about because Americans are too fat, lazy and decadent to care enough to fight for
their civilization and their values.
Amped-up storm coverage
may become the norm. Nearly a year later, hurricanes Katrina and Rita are still fresh on Gulf
Coast minds, and Houston's television stations are trending toward more aggressive storm coverage.
The Editor continues to rant...
How can someone report current events aggressively without dishonest hype? What
does "aggressive coverage" really mean anyway? It means the poorly educated masses in
Houston will be drenched, if you will, with sensational, pessimistically speculative, tabloid
television. This style of "journalism" benefits only the TV stations and their advertisers,
not the viewers.
How a New York Times reporter's passion
for Castro led him astray: Aha! Finally we've discovered the missing ingredient
in American journalism, the vitamin deficiency that's been shrinking newspaper circulation and TV
newscast audiences all these years. What Americans clamor for is not information but passion.
The heroes of the coverage of Katrina were not the reporters who got the most accurate stories but
the ones who shouted the loudest or cried the hardest.
TV News Meets the Vast
Wasteland: Those amusing, though sadly depressing man-in-the-street interviews are an indication
that the American hoi-polloi get whatever knowledge they may have only from TV newscasts, not printed
material. For this reason, national TV news has become increasingly more dependent on the sensationalism
that their entertainment brethren can provide to attract viewers. It's sometimes hard to determine where
news coverage leaves off and entertainment begins, but the signs have been around for a long time. The
O.J. Simpson day-by-day trial was the most egregious example, but John Kennedy Jr.'s fatal flight coverage was
a close second in televised excess. Aging stalwarts like Barbara Walters think they can alternate
between slobbering celebrity interviews and interrogating prominent political figures without suffering
a lack of credibility.
Barbara Walters is not a role model.
She's written a tell-all autobiography. And she's promoting it on ABC, which continues to employ her.
Once upon a time, legitimate news organizations would not have allowed a conflict of interest like this.
ABC Even Complains About
Charity. No good deed goes unpunished — that was the theme of an ABC Christmas day segment
about donating clothing to charity. "World News Tonight with Charles Gibson," took "A Closer Look"
at charities and gave the appearance of dishonesty.
RIP:
protest films, e-porn and bimbos. Year's end is a time of many media traditions. For example,
the tearing away of the last page of the calendar is all the excuse TV producers need to recycle hours of sensational
video footage of dubious news value on the pretense that viewers need to relive the last 365 days. ... And
then there's the practice of "spotting trends" from the year. Trend-spotting has become something of an
obsession with today's journalists, particularly at newspapers coping with the fact that they don't "break"
news the way they did in the past.
Long Winter
for the Media. It is an unsettling time to be a journalist. You are either on the edge of
extinction or in charge of the universe. The newspaper industry is condemned to write piecemeal its own
obituary without knowing when or how — or, truth be told, if — the end will come.
Broadcast media now possess a self-inflated importance that they rarely bother to deny.
The L.A.
Times's Human Wrecking Ball. Great newspapers take decades to build. We are discovering
that they can be dismantled in relatively short order.
Fence
fiasco: Or Feliz ano nuevo. The decline of American sovereignty would typically
be a big story in any year, but with all the news coming out of Hollywood this year, maybe it
was a bit overshadowed by more significant events. I mean, how can the virtual surrender
of a 231-year-old nation to the Pollyanna-ish forces of political correctness possibly compete
with the dramatic real-life struggles of Britney Spears, Angelina Jolie, Tom Cruise, and the
nation's hot new nymphet, Britney's baby sister, Jamie Lynn Spears?
Summertime, and the news is so
cheesy. Last year's Great August Story was left-wing activist Cindy Sheehan's absurd campout
near the president's Texas ranch, which, much to the dismay of Mrs. Sheehan, was interrupted only after
Hurricane Katrina struck the Gulf Coast. Remember the Summer of the Shark? That was 2001, when
the media hyped shark attacks, despite the widely acknowledged fact that the season's attacks were no higher
than previous seasons'.
Bigotry and Sports:
Although not too many years ago, sports-writing was considered the "toy department" of journalism, the boys and
girls in the press box have been eager to catch up to their counterparts in the "real" world. And so, they
are also no longer content with merely reporting the scores, trades and what have you; they must now generate
the news. And, similar to the mainstream media, they need divisive issues in order to push the agenda of
all J-school graduates: to change the world.
Hurricane Hype Clouds Warming
Debate. ABC's Jeffrey Kofman sounded the alarm about storms so bad scientists "are now considering
adding a fearsome category 6. That's hurricanes of more than 175 miles an hour. Something no
one would want to meet head-on." No one did. Category 6 wasn't even added, and the chorus of
media hype about another deadly season of storms turned into so much hot air. That's right — forecasts
for the 2006 hurricane season, which ends November 30, have proven entirely wrong. Instead of
17 tropical storms and hurricanes, we got only nine.
Frivolous
politics: In these grim and foreboding times, our media have this year spent incredible amounts
of time on a hunting accident involving Vice President Cheney, a bogus claim that the administration revealed
Valerie Plame's identity as a C.I.A. "agent" — actually a desk job in Virginia — and is
now going ballistic over a Congressman who sent raunchy e-mails to Congressional pages. This is the
frivolous media — and the biased media.
9/11 Myths, Debunked. Trust that
conspiracy theorists will attempt to exploit the fifth anniversary of 9/11 to spread sensational claims and
sensational lies. Moreover, it's a fair bet sensationalist media will collaborate, not because the
squawk show host or headline scribbler believes the poisoned foolishness, but because anger, fear and
trembling sell.
Shepard Smith Smears Swift Boat
Vets. While some press attention has been focused on the seeming odd-couple of Rupert
Murdoch raising money for Hillary Clinton, another fascinating relationship has apparently been developed
between Fox News and Hugh Hefner's Playboy. Fox News' Neil Cavuto aired an interview with Hugh Hefner
on May 4, on the grounds that the announcement of his "Playmate of the Year" was "business news," and
Fox News anchor Shepard Smith is interviewed in the June issue of Playboy magazine.
Al Gore and the Global Warming
Scare. People are naturally prone to worry about dangers that are invisible: radioactivity, for
one spectacular example. The media know this, and are forever trumpeting the discovery of new perils
to scare us with. Hardly a week passes without someone announcing that some familiar food or other
useful substance has just been discovered to cause cancer (though usually only when administered in huge doses
to mice). Dangers associated with weather are special favorites because they are usually so difficult to
cope with. In recent decades, we have been treated to alarmist reports about impending disasters to be
caused by nuclear winter, acid rain and the ozone hole. But the Big Daddy of all such scare stories
is "global warming."
TV Jumps on Stale NSA Database Story. Like the TV
coverage, USA Today's story insinuated that the existence of the database was a major violation of Americans'
privacy rights and evidence that the President was lying last December when he described the NSA's eavesdropping
on suspected terrorist communications as limited and targeted.
Simply Put, the US Mainstream
Media Provides an Inferior Product. They may have the most advanced technology for delivering
the news and the flashiest sets, graphics and promotional tactics; they may have scoured the earth for the
"prettiest" people who can read Teleprompters and those with the most important sounding voices, but they
have sacrificed their credibility at the altar of the almighty advertising dollar and because of that the
public's trust in the mainstream media is shattered.
Drivin' and Not Cryin'? When it
comes to gas prices, the media too often know the price of everything and the value of nothing. Flip
open a paper and turn on the TV and you'll learn that gas prices are rising again. "Stormy 6 Weeks
Ahead" says CBSNews and warns consumers to expect "pain at the pump."
Digging for the
truth: Too many journalists fail to dig deeply enough to get to the real story. They
breathless hype the latest scare about everything from pesticides and "road rage" to cell phones and
irradiated food. Deadly dangers lurk everywhere, and your Intrepid Reporter is all that stands
between you and certain disaster.
Media eat up
absurd rape story. I called it back in April. When a black stripper claimed three white
Duke University lacrosse players gang-raped her at a party, I knew instinctively it was a lie. The
tale reeked of Tawana Brawley-like fabrications.
Hold that
opinion. Opinion journalism — the business not of reporting what happened, but of
commenting on it — tends to place a premium on speed. When that story breaks on Tuesday,
members of the pundits' guild spring into action as well. Editorial writers and columnists tell their
readers what the news means. TV talking heads and radio pontificators pass judgment. Internet
bloggers — the commentariat's newest, increasingly influential players — scramble
to weigh in.
CBS Whips Up Worry about Hurricane
Season: The first day of spring [2006] proved perfect timing for the CBS's Jim Acosta to resurrect
global warming as the villain behind last year's hurricane season, downplaying how hotly debated the matter
is in the scientific community.
NASCAR Furious
With NBC Over 'Dateline' Segment. "It is outrageous that a news organization of NBC's
stature would stoop to the level of going out to create news instead of reporting news," [NASCAR
spokesman Ramsey] Poston said [4/5/2006]. "Any legitimate journalist in America should be
embarrassed by this stunt. The obvious intent by NBC was to evoke reaction, and we are
confident our fans won't take the bait," he said.
Are You Satisfied With Your TV
News? Sound bites! They may be the death of Western civilization! The triviality of
our network and local TV news is well known. Locally, so much of the local channels give us a steady diet
of blood and guts that is debilitating. All the accidents, the murders, the court appearances of sordid
criminals, the crimes of all descriptions seem to be their main focus.
The propaganda broadcasting
network: The definition of propaganda describes ABC News' decision to enlist the services of
actor and teenage heartthrob, Leonardo DiCaprio, to interview President Clinton about the environment:
"the spreading of ideas, information or rumor for the purpose of helping or injuring an institution, a cause
or a person."
Cool Britannia:
Sometimes, during what are called "slow news periods," newspapers and magazines struggle to fill pages.
In America at least, they solve this problem several ways: by printing what are generously called "puff
pieces", by covering tabloid trash stories, or by recycling old items to try to get more mileage out of
them. We seem to be in one of those times nationally, even with the so-called "war on terrorism."
When George W. Bush choking on a pretzel is the big story of the week, you know it is a
slow news time.
What
is the media thinking by ignoring the Medal of Honor? "If it bleeds, it leads" is a canon of
today's mass media, so bad news usually trumps good news for editors and producers. But this week proves
there is an even more powerful maxim: "Trivial celebrity news beats all." The carefully choreographed
royal pronouncement pushed at least two other events — far more important to Americans — well
into the background of U.S. print and broadcast media.
Soft News Erodes
Audience: The rise in "soft news" and "critical journalism" could be turning off
traditional news audiences, according to a Harvard University study. Soft news was defined as
being typically more sensational, more personality-centered, more entertainment-oriented and more
incident-based than traditional public affairs news.
Christmas with Hef: They claim
that she gets "the big stories." But MSNBC's Rita Cosby continues to dig in the bottom of the
barrel to attract an audience.
Our
most destructive kind of racism. Paula Zahn devoted two of her hour-long CNN shows this week to
the topic "Skin Deep: Racism in America." After taking the time to watch, the question I walked away with
was: "What was the point?" In my view, the shows told us little that most of us don't already
know — strong racist sentiments exist in the country — and really never asked the deeper
and more important questions about what this means and why we should care.
O.J., "Kramer"
and limits: This "If I Did It" book and TV interview monstrosity was deliberately planned for the
last week of the November sweeps, and Simpson reportedly was to be paid a cool $3.5 million for his
efforts. It was a disaster. Fox News Channel discussed the story relentlessly, obviously promoting
both the book and the upcoming interview, but it backfired and open revolt ensued.
Celebrities
At The End. The surrealism of celebrity pop culture erupts when a major celebrity dies. The
sudden, mysterious death of Michael Jackson caused a near-total eclipse of the real news. The cable-news
channels blurred into 24-7 wailing walls for the so-called "King of Pop." Television ratings surged with
a big ka-ching. So much for the "news" business.
The Michael Jackson funeral.
In their rush to pander to the lowest common denominator, the major media, especially television, have fallen for their own
hype, in a self-reinforcing cycle of Jackson mania. They believed the importance of their coverage was revealed by the
fact that all their peers and competitors regarded Jackson as equally important. The public has even less reason to
place their confidence in the antique media that brought us the sensationalistic coverage of the funeral of a celebrity
whose career and life have been falling apart for many years.
The 12 Days of Michael.
There's no doubt about it. Celebrity is the media's top priority. Michael Jackson's June 25 death
overshadowed all other news for almost two weeks. Nightly news programs on ABC, CBS and NBC featured at least
one story each night about Jackson since his death. More than half of those broadcasts aired since June 25
lead (sic) with a story about Jackson.
What ever Happened To The Erupting Iceland Volcano?
The Eyjafjallajokull volcano continues to erupt in Iceland, but the story has fallen off the very small mainstream media
tabletop. ... A brief examination of climate history shows how much it changes naturally and how those changes are a great
influence on nature and human history. The planes may be flying again but the fallout from the eruption is just
beginning. The mainstream media ... quickly lurch on to the next hysteria leaving the outcome and fallout of
previous hysterias unreported.
The Lies of Duke: "She was
black, they were white, and race and sex were in the air." That's how a Washington Post columnist
described the atmosphere that led to the brutal gang rape of Crystal Mangum by a group of Duke University
lacrosse players in 2006. You remember, right? That was the violent, racially motivated hate crime
that never happened.
Journalists
become 'self-reverential' celebrities. Newsmen have become the news. And the gossip. One may
run for office. Many are vying for a single plum job. Another is suing his old network for millions.
It is a long way from the austere days of Eric Sevareid, when staid anchormen left stardom to Hollywood.
The national news media provide publicity for
every crazed gunman who goes out with a bang. Dial CNN for
Murder. The same dangerous pattern has been repeated again and again. The disturbed man who
took hostages at Sen. Clinton's headquarters in New Hampshire told loved ones to "watch the news tonight."
The shooter who terrorized an Omaha shopping mall by mowing down total strangers has achieved his goal (and I
will not add to the problem by publishing his name). He left a suicide note in which he predicted "at
least now I'll be famous." His picture is featured in every newspaper and is flashed on television
hourly. His miseries are being dissected and analyzed. ... And other disturbed people are watching
and taking note.
The Media Has Declared...
WAR! Newsrooms and hospitals have one major thing in common: the "hush" is the loudest thing
anyone ever hears. The "hush" is the moment when normal activity stops cold for an announcement of major
events that will entirely reshape any usual activity. While both newsrooms and hospitals stop on that kind of
news — and then, following it, race into a whirlwind of overdrive — the similarities end
there. Hospitals gird for the incoming and the flood of bad news to follow; most newsrooms do not.
In a newsroom, tragic events are met with a different vibe: an electric jolt that energizes the room with a
sense of self-importance. The shot of adrenaline that surges through a newsroom is fascinating to watch.
Media
madness: The Virginia Tech story. There seems to be just one template for the media in
covering tragedies like that which just occurred at Virginia Tech: Discussion of further regulation of
guns and so much coverage of the perpetrator that copycats are sure to be impressed. … Seeing the
glorification of the latest mass murderer, the next Cho may be already getting some ideas about how to
take follow in his footsteps.
Reducing
the risk of copycat killers: The way the media cover an event influences whether
there will be repetitions. For example, if a fan runs onto the field during a baseball
game, the broadcast cameras usually avoid showing pictures of the fan. The TV producers
know that the fan on the field is seeking attention, and that, presumably, getting his picture
on television will reward him. Moreover, broadcasting the man's antics would encourage
copycats.
Five
Questions about Shootings at Universities. The day after the mass murder of students at Northern
Illinois University (NIU), the headline in the closest major newspaper, the Chicago Tribune, was:
"6 Dead in NIU Shooting." "6 dead" included the murderer. Why wasn't the headline
"5 killed at NIU"? It is nothing less than moronic that the media routinely lump murderers
and their victims in the same tally. This is something entirely new. Until the morally confused
took over the universities and the news media, murderers were never counted along with their victims.
In
time of tragedy, media are at their worst. The press, particularly television news networks
… [are] competing with each other like starving dogs for the slightest new morsel of information they
can then put on a permanent loop on cable TV, until the next fragmentary detail is pried loose by a reporter
desperate to be first, for 15 minutes. Because there isn't enough new information to fill the
infinite void allotted to these stories, the press quickly succumbs to a kind of emotional vampirism, feeding
off the grief, fear and anguish of victims clearly incapable of understanding their own feelings….
Murder by media?
Did the non-stop playing of the Virginia Tech killer's twisted thoughts help to push a fragile mind in Houston
to walk the same grisly path? Has the airing of that video set in motion other killers and imitators who
may not carry out their copy-cat crimes for months or years?
Autism Fraud Just the Tip of the Iceberg.
The lead author of that anti-vaccine study, which also appeared in one most respected medical journals, The
Lancet, was British physician Andrew Wakefield. And its consequences include millions of terrified
and confused parents, large drops in vaccination rates and death. Yet while this "deliberate fraud" has
been exposed, others continue to go unchallenged, or worse, get trumpeted by reporters who should know better.
Regarding Wakefield, many people, including me, have spent years puncturing his claims and those of his acolytes
in the anti-vaccine movement. But a media that thrives on sensationalism instead played up the phony link.
Hooked on trivia.
We try to hear and see no evil, but it's not far-fetched to suggest that future world events could quickly change
the lives of millions. So why then fixate on Anna Nicole, Rosie, Imus and Alec? Simple — they
are the modern equivalents of grotesque carnival freak shows that used to provide a perverse sense of escapism
from what people dare not face. Yet as our dependency on such tabloid distraction grows, so, too, do the
real dangers that we ignore.
The
Lines Between News and Entertainment are Blurring. An on-screen NBC News identifier for
a fictional debate on "The West Wing" and a "news conference" by a fake Boston Red Sox executive on
ESPN show how fuzzy the lines between news and entertainment have become.
Too much TV drama over storms. We
are now celebrating the anniversary of the Katrina hurricane and if one did not know better, one would think
it was a fantastic event. … The hurricane season started a couple of months ago, and when watching TV,
reading the papers or listening to the radio, it was obvious that the media was waiting with bated breath
for the next disaster. The season is half over and we can report no disasters. They really are
disappointed.
Like the wind, hurricane predictions keep
shifting. Hurricane forecaster William Gray's team downgraded its predictions again for the
2006 Atlantic storm season Friday [9/1/2006], saying 13 named storms are likely to form this year instead
of 15. … Before hurricane season began June 1, Gray's team called for 17 named storms. He
trimmed that to 15 early last month.
Weather
has become bogeyman, news staple. It began as a mass e-mail in a certain Seattle
office building on December's first day. A cold front was arriving! Snow! Ice! Untold
inches for the city and surrounding area! … The cautious drove home after lunch. The brave
stayed behind. And the snow never came. Not even an inch.
Global Warming to Blame for Hot
Weather Hyperbole. A heat index of more than 100 degrees for days on end not only drains
the body and spirit, but it also takes its toll on the thesaurus. There is a limit to the number of
ways to describe the heat and still sound relatively intelligent.
Silly Talk:
How many times have you heard a weatherman say that the sun will try to come out later in the day? Sometimes
their prediction turns out to be false and I wonder whether they would explain it by saying the sun didn't try
hard enough. But it's not just weathermen who use teleological explanations, ascribing purposeful behavior
to inanimate objects.
The Media
Rush to Duke's Defense. Usually, reporters breathlessly take everything prosecutors and the
police say at face value, often to devastating effect upon criminal defendants. The "perp walk," in
which a suspect is paraded publicly in handcuffs from place to place, often after officials have told
television producers where to place their cameras, is only the most visible example of this practice. The
reporters get their shot. The police get to portray the defendant, innocent or not, as
dangerous (i.e. guilty) in the eyes of potential jurors.
All the
news is a stage. As they spin the Saddam trial and deride our soldiers in Iraq, the
lesson is clear: These media masters of theater are incapable of delivering real drama and
good news unless they control the script. Fortunately, you control the remote.
What's
Right About America! Last Sunday when I returned from church services I
opened my hometown newspaper, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, and settled in with a
cup of coffee to review the day's news. It was a good thing I had already received
my inspiration at church, or I could have easily become downright depressed over the
negative headlines in nearly every section of the paper. The majority of headlines
on the front page of each section promised a story that would focus on the negative aspect
of an event or issue, rather than the positive contributions people are making to fix
the biggest problems we face.
Ending
a losing streak: The left is on another losing streak today, and so their
intellectual leaders in the liberal media have gone back to the old playbook for an easy
win that will get their team out of its slump. This time, it is the rich getting
richer and the poor getting poorer, which has been working for them since the days
of Karl Marx.
Fred Barnes Calls
Sheehan a "Crackpot," Rues Media Focus on Her. Barnes criticized both
her and the media's treatment of her: "This woman wants to go in and tell the
President that the war is about oil because the President wants to pay off his
buddies. She's a crackpot, and yet the press treats her as some important protestor."
The Brawley Case of the
South: [Scroll down] Reluctance to change a popular story line helps account for the strange press
coverage of Cindy Sheehan. That line pitted moral mom versus stone-hearted president. When
Ms. Sheehan's outbursts grew stranger, the press stayed with the soft line about a mother's grief
and simply omitted her increasingly bizarre comments that American troops were "being sent to kill innocent
people" in Iraq and that President Bush was "a filth spewer" and "an evil maniac" guilty of "blatant
genocide." The insurgents who killed her son Casey, on the other hand, were "freedom fighters."
Let's keep
arguing. It's true that we have more semistructured "Crossfire"-style debates
than ever before. But much of this is rigidly preprogrammed sniping (I was once
chastised by a TV producer for not interrupting other speakers more. What a
failure!) Even when the sniping is downplayed, TV demands sharp sound bites,
which pushes all talking heads toward more vehemence and simplemindedness. Instant
certainty becomes mandatory, a delivery style many talking heads start to regret
before they're even out of the studio. Where is the real debate?
None Dare Call It
Fascism. After Johnson's War on Poverty, Nixon's War on Drugs, and Carter's Energy Crisis, then
came the premier liberal crisis of modern times, the Environmental Crisis. The media predictably plays
an enthusiastic accomplice in these schemes, not just because its members are mostly liberal, but more
importantly, crises generate more readers, viewers, and listeners. This is why the principal product
American media sells to its customers is crisis, not information.
"The one function TV news performs very well is that when there is no news we give it to you with the same
emphasis as if there were."
News Media Dishonesty
... aside from the specific cases cited above and elsewhere.
Bias is one thing, but
sometimes newspaper and TV reporters are just overtly dishonest.
Overview and recap articles:
If
it's in the media, it isn't true. We cannot trust anything uttered by any politician
or mainstream media outlet. Nothing. If the politicians and media are saying it, we
would be safer to assume, until proven otherwise, that they are lying, treat it with suspicion and
look very very closely at it. A safe rule of thumb is: if it's in the media, it isn't true.
[...] One thing that is becoming a strong feature of the current political puppet show is that
nobody is proposing any real actions to improve the life, liberty, pursuit of happiness and
overall survival level of the honest citizenry or to resolve the real problems that trouble, impede
and suppress that citizenry. If you look closely at what these con men are saying, you
will discover mostly, if not totally, mere waffle and spin with no substance. We are at the
same time constantly and relentlessly told how bad everything is. [...] Thus we are encouraged to
view the world as worse than it actually is. That is not to say that there are not bad
situations, just that they are always presented as worse and more frightening than they actually are.
The Editor says...
TV weather reports always make approaching storms seem more dangerous than they are. Reporters
try to make global warming sound like more of a threat than it is. There is no "climate crisis."
The TV reporters certainly made Covid-19 sound
worse than it was. DDT never hurt anybody.
The polar bears aren't disappearing.
Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant.
The official explanation of WTC Building 7 is a pack of lies.
The 1995 Oklahoma City bombing — ditto.
The Crash of TWA 800 — ditto.
The Kennedy
assassination — ditto. (Just ask DorothyKilgallen.)
Jeffrey Epstein didn't kill himself.
Neither did Vince Foster.
Nobody knows who blew up the Nord Stream pipeline.
Nobody knows who left a packet of cocaine in the White House.
Nobody knows who leaked information from the Supreme Court.
Nobody knows who left dummy pipe bombs at the DNC and RNC headquarters
on January 6, 2021.
(But if you took a cell phone to Washington DC that day, they
know exactly where you are today!)
Islam is not a "religion of peace."
Riding on mass transit is not safe.
The 2020 presidential election was stolen.
Barack H. Obama is a Muslim,
his birth certificate is a forgery,
and he uses somebody else's Social Security number.
Numerous other examples of news media dishonesty can be found on this page. I'm not the only skeptic in
America. There is no longer any good reason to have a TV in your house. The TV is a liar.
The
Media-Democratic Fusion. If one were to listen during the last few years to NBC, ABC,
CBS, NPR, PBS, MSNBC, or CNN, or read the New York Times, The Washington Post, The Chicago Tribune,
or the Los Angeles Times, then one would have believed the following: A) Donald Trump worked
with the Russians to throw and win the 2016 election. As part of that skullduggery,
frolicking amid prostitutes he urinated on a Moscow hotel bed to spite Barack Obama. B) He
was mentally incapacitated as president and should have been removed under the 25th
Amendment. C) In 2020, his campaign once more worked with the Russians to create an exact
replica of Hunter Biden's laptop, replete with dozens of lurid fake photos and hundreds of cleverly
doctored emails to smear the Biden family and aid his own reelection effort. D) Trump as
chief conspirator preplanned a violent and armed insurrection that sought to storm and permanently
occupy the government, violently hijacking the balloting and seizing the presidency —
resulting in the murder of a Capitol police officer and the subsequent deaths of other traumatized
officers. E) For the last eight years, none of Trump's political opponents have ever
destroyed subpoenaed evidence, conspired to hire foreign nationals to compile false and lurid files
on him to subvert his political campaigns, or used their political offices to help solicit foreign
money for family lobbyists. F) Trump is the first major candidate and politician who
allegedly overvalued his real assets to obtain a loan that he repaid; the first to have concluded
non-disclosure agreements with potential embarrassing liaisons; the first ex-president to remove
sensitive files to his personal residence; and the first to phone a state official to whine about
the integrity of the vote count. G) He is the first losing presidential candidate or major
politician to question an election result or to seek redress through government agencies to rectify
the purported corruption of the balloting.
It
is no wonder Americans are so confused. Here are some of the lies the media intentionally spreads
as they push the leftist agenda and seek to destroy anyone who gets in their way:
• The border agents whipped illegal immigrants. The media, Justice Department and other
Democrats knew this was a lie from day one but didn't care.
• Women are going to die because abortion is limited or prevented. This is a despicable
lie meant to scare everyone. Not one state that restricts abortion prevents the termination of a pregnancy when
the mother's life is in danger.
[...]
• The "Hands up don't shoot" lie was meant to gin up racial hate and division
against white cops. How many cops have been injured or killed because so many in the media and others spread this lie?
• That January 6th was an armed insurrection. The FBI determined it wasn't planned or
organized and no arms were confiscated. [...]
• That the 2020 election was pure as the driven snow. The media and other Democrats know
that many states intentionally violated election laws and that Mark Zuckerberg's money violated laws but don't care.
• The Antifa and BLM riots were mostly peaceful
• That the U.S has always been a racist country, that all whites are racist and privileged,
and all other races are oppressed.
• That the vaccines will prevent the virus. The media sought to silence anyone who disagreed with the false narrative.
• That the CDC based everything on science.
[...]
• That the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation. They made this up to bury the
story before the election as they campaigned for Biden.
• That the science is settled that humans, fossil fuels, and CO2 cause warming. There is
not one piece of scientific data from the last 150 years that supports this theory, only easily manipulated computer
models that have always been wrong.
Losing
Confidence in the Pillars of Our Civilization. Conservatives have always been amused by the liberal biases of
the old network news and big-city print media. But they grudgingly admitted that many liberal journalists of the last
century were mostly professionals. News divisions mostly reported the news rather than simply made it up. Not so
now with Big Tech and 21stt-century [sic] "woke" journalism. Few reporters have yet offered apologies for helping hatch and
spread the Russian collusion hoax that paralyzed the country for three years. Few have admitted culpability for reporting
as fact the various fantasies surrounding the Duke Lacrosse team prosecution or the Covington Catholic kids deception. Many
in the media ran uncritically with the Jussie Smollett concoction and the "hands-up-don't shoot" Ferguson distortions.
Journalists promulgated misinformation about the "white Hispanic" George Zimmerman-Trayvon Martin encounter, and doctored photos
and edited tapes. They invented the myth of the supposedly brilliant — but now utterly disgraced former Governor
Andrew Cuomo — as well as the "Russian disinformation" yarn that allegedly accounted for the missing Hunter Biden
laptop. Most recently, reporters spread serial untruths surrounding the Kyle Rittenhouse trial.
When
all the media narratives collapse. [Scroll down] Think of the other narratives the MSM pushed in recent
years that have collapsed. They viciously defamed the Covington boys. They authoritatively told us that bounties
had been placed on US soldiers in Afghanistan by Putin — and Trump's denials only made them more certain.
They told us that the lab-leak theory of Covid was a conspiracy theory with no evidence behind it at all. [...] Wrong.
Wrong. Wrong. The MSM took the ludicrous story of Jussie Smollett seriously because it fit their nutty "white
supremacy" narrative. They told us that a woman was brutally gang-raped at UVA (invented), that the Pulse mass shooting
was driven by homophobia (untrue) and that the Atlanta spa shooter was motivated by anti-Asian bias (no known evidence for
that at all). [...] More recently, the MSM were telling us for months that inflation is a phantasm. [...] Any concern was
"fearmongering politics." And now we wake up to the highest inflation in 30 years, counter-balancing wage increases.
[...] We were told that vaccines would end the Covid pandemic. [...] We were told that the migrant surge at the border was
just seasonal, and nothing out of the ordinary, even as 1.7 million migrants were illegally trying to get into the country in
the last year. [...] We were — and still are! — being told by most of the media that critical race
theory isn't in high schools at all. Meanwhile, a tsunami of evidence is out there showing that it absolutely
is — in every subject, and every class, as the central philosophy behind many states' education policies. We
all get things wrong. What makes this more worrying is simply that all these false narratives just happen to
favor the interests of the left and the Democratic party. And corrections, when they occur, take up a fraction of the
space of the original falsehoods.
Radio Free America — Rush's Legacy.
For decades — before the internet and satellite TV — news in America was controlled by a select few entities, all of which were closely aligned with the Democrat
party. ABC, NBC, CBS, and CNN controlled television and radio news. The New York Times, Washington Post, Chicago Tribune, Boston Globe, and Los Angeles Times set the tone
for printed news. The media and leftist politicians they supported were creating narratives to shape public opinion. They crafted their narratives by being selective in
what news they presented, or by outright distortion of facts. [...]
• Walter Cronkite told us the Vietnam war was lost after the Tet Offensive. In fact, Tet was a devastating loss for the North Vietnamese.
• We were told that socialism was superior to capitalism. It just needed to be implemented correctly.
• We were told that Ronald Reagan was a fool and a dangerous warmonger. Yet he won the Cold War without firing a shot.
• We were told that Cuba was a workingman's paradise with free education and medical care. Yet people were fleeing the island on anything that would float.
We knew what we observed didn't quite fit the narrative being presented, but we weren't sure why. We began to question our worldview. We were being gaslighted.
The Media
That Cried Wolf. "The Boy Who Cried Wolf" is one of many of Aesop's fables. [...] The moral is that nobody
believes a liar, even when he is telling the truth. How is a twenty-five-hundred-year-old story relevant today?
Let's rewrite the fable bringing it up to date. The shepherd boy today is the collection of social justice warriors
throughout the media, academia, and entertainment worlds, basically the core of the modern Democrat Party.
The
Trump Nail in the Media Coffin. When Cronkite returned from Vietnam after the 1968 Tet Offensive and declared the war stalemated and
unwinnable, no one dared to offer the dissenting viewpoint that Tet was actually a decisive American victory. The mainstream-media
narrative in 1963 that Lee Harvey Oswald, the Castroite, Communist assassin of President John F. Kennedy, was a product of right-wing Texas
hatred was completely crazy — but largely unquestioned. [...] MSNBC anchor Brian Williams sermonized about the so-called "fake news" epidemic.
Williams failed to remind us that he was removed as NBC's evening news anchor for serving up all sorts of fake details about his supposedly brave
trips abroad in search of edgy news stories. After the fatal shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, the co-hosts of the show CNN
Newsroom collectively put up their hands in "hands up, don't shoot" solidarity — echoing a narrative of police murder later proved
to be completely false by a lengthy federal investigation.
The
Myth of the Good Old Media. Donald Trump recently noted that the media had become much worse since Walter Cronkite,
which is an honest mistake by a man who grew up as a Democrat leaning to the left. But there was no "Good Old Honorable
Media." The establishment media have been utterly biased and often outright dishonest for many decades. The 1965 CBS
documentary Hunger in America began with outright lies, citing an infant dying in a hospital as the victim of malnutrition,
which was pure invention. The 1971 CBS documentary The Selling of the Pentagon actually took the answer of an assistant
secretary of state to one question and edited it so that he was giving the answer to another question — and the documentary
did that over and over again.
Journalistic
standards have had nothing to do with the truth for a long time. The media knows that Trump gave aid to Ukraine
with nothing in return and Obama/Biden withheld aid and only gave a loan to Ukraine after they demanded and got a prosecutor
fired, but they say Biden/Obama did nothing wrong and Trump should be impeached. We don't have the right to hear from
anyone who disagrees on climate change. How does so much of the U.S have exceptionally low temperatures if 150 years of
fossil fuel use, 150 years of CO2 increase and an exponential increase in the number of people worldwide causes warming?
While the media intentionally hides the truth for things negative to Democrats, they collude with Democrats to perpetrate a known
lie that Trump colluded with Russia in 2016. They perpetrated gossip to take out Kavanaugh in 2018 with no evidence.
They intentionally lie about what Trump said about Charlottesville to gin up racial hate and violence. They treat congenital
liars Schiff, Brennan, Clapper, Rice and others as credible people as they seek to destroy Trump and elect democrats.
If
Anyone Should Be Impeached, It's the Liberal Media. For decades now, in violation of the public trust, liberals
in the American mainstream media — including the news, information, and entertainment media — have
willfully corrupted the values and institutions that made the United States of America into the greatest nation in the
history of humanity. Their lies and immorality have wrought havoc on families, churches, schools, businesses,
corporations, governments, and so on. Contrary to their sacred duty to provide what is truthful, they have willfully
presented false and misleading information to the public at large concerning, but not limited to, the following:
[#1] The election of Democrats over Republicans. [...] [#2] The role of good government — especially in
most every fiscal matter. [...] [#3] The nature and details concerning radical Islam and Islam in general. [...] [#4] The
nature and details of the burning of fossil fuels as it relates to global climate change — specifically what is often
referred to as "global warming."
Trump,
Kavanaugh, Lewandowski and our malignant Left. This new attempt by the NYT and two wholly unethical reporters
at that paper again crosses all lines of respectable, legitimate journalism. The NYT is no longer, and has not been for
ages, an honest broker of the news; it is rag that dispenses fake news intended to deceive. The facts of this campaign
to ruin Kavanaugh and his family, because the left wants to protect unimpeded abortion rights, are well-known and
obvious. They are also a stain on all those who participated in the scheme, a scarlet letter of a sort. Nothing
any of them ever writes again can be or will be trusted. Nothing published by the NYT can be trusted.
Nothing on CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS or NBC can be trusted. They are all agents of corruption and deceit.
The Best Of CNN 2018. CNN's
version of "news" has become outright parody so many times in 2018 it was difficult to keep track of. Thankfully, Mark
Dice has done just that with a "Best of CNN" video that lays out just how idiotic the Establishment Media now is as they get
completely lost within their own anti-Trump hysteria. Anyone who still considers CNN, MSNBC, the New York Times, etc.,
actual news needs to get their collective heads examined. It's globalist propoganda — all of it.
[Video clip]
Who
Watches the Media Watchdogs? Who was it that told America Al Gore won the 2000 election? Who told us the
Fort Hood shooter wasn't an Islamist terrorist? Who told us a meek and mild Michael Brown was shot with his hands up,
begging to surrender? Who told us CAIR, the Muslim Brotherhood front in the U.S., is a "civil rights organization"?
Who is still telling us that after 9-11, there was a violent "backlash" against Muslims in America? Who told us climate
change is settled science? Who ducked the story about abortionist Kermit Gosnell's Philadelphia slaughterhouse?
Who told us all the troubles in the Middle East are caused by Israel? Who told us that Robert Mueller's list of indictments
proves Trump colluded with Russia? Who told us it was Trump who initiated the "policy" of family separation at the southern
border? Who ran a fake magazine cover to show Trump looming over a crying Honduran toddler?
Hall Monitor Nation. The media relentlessly lied to
the public about Hillary's health, denouncing conservatives as "conspiracy theorists" for mentioning it. Then an alert citizen with an iPhone
captured Hillary having to be carried to her car at the 9/11 memorial service in 2016. Mainstream media outlets painted a cherubic picture of
Michael Brown after he was fatally shot by Missouri. He was a "gentle giant," gunned down like a dog as he plaintively cried, "Hands up! Don't
shoot!" HEY! Wait a second! How did that video get out of Brown manhandling a tiny Indian man while robbing a convenience store?
That should have been suppressed like the Broaddrick interview! Would we ever have known about Monica Lewinsky, but for the Drudge Report
publishing the blockbuster story that Newsweek had killed? Currently, the establishment media are in a rage that the public has found out
about the modern genocide being waged against white South African farmers.
The
2018 Breitbart News Fake News Awards. Until you actually take the time to research the amount of lies and lies
and lies the establishment media deliberately spread, you can't begin to fathom just how bad things are. By the time I was
done going through the entire year, I literally, no joke, had 11 pages of headlines to choose from for these awards.
Timely news and commentary:
Here
Lies the Mainstream Media. On Tuesday night, roughly 72 million Americans buried
the reeking carcass once called "legacy media." [...] Trust in the news outlets that were, many
ages ago, the hallmark of integrity and investigation has plummeted — steeply.
Why? Because we found out that the mainstream media has been lying. When it became
blatantly obvious to much of the nation that Biden may, in fact, be suffering from cognitive
decline, memory lapses, and possibly even dementia or Parkinson's, mainstream media covered it up,
as they had covered it up for years. ABC News even offered the sitting president an
opportunity to persuade voters on air that he was fit as a fiddle. When Harris took Biden's
place as the Democratic presidential candidate, mainstream media rushed to downplay her extreme,
left-wing record. When the vice president sat down for an interview on CBS News's famous
"60 Minutes" program, the news team apparently doctored the recorded interview, cutting and
pasting Harris's incoherent answers to match questions that might make more sense to viewers.
How
media fails. Of all the institutions that have failed us in past years, none has been
worse than the media. [...] The total lack of reporting and curiosity about what was really going
on at the southern border was beyond the pale. The flow of 10 to 20 million illegal
immigrants was barely reported for three years until, again, the ramifications were becoming
evident to too many people. Where were the nightly photos of immigrants from some very
dangerous places flooding over the Rio Grande? If you looked at a few conservative outlets
you were aware of it. If you only looked at the traditional media, you weren't. They
just reported the obvious misinformation coming from the administration that the border was
secure. We should demand better from the press. They can't understand why the public
holds them in such low esteem but they have earned the current lack of trust.
Whom
Should the Media Blame for Harris's Defeat? [Scroll down] In all of these
discussions, the media do not point to a prominent element common to each of the perceived
problems: the media themselves. Of course, the media were too compromised by partisan motives
to report what they had known for most of Biden's term: he clearly suffered from advanced
dementia. As Axios political reporter Hans Nichols recently noted on Fox's America's
Newsroom, the media came down hard on any reporter who proposed a well sourced story on Biden's
lack of acuity, because that would help Trump. Publicizing this infirmity would have had
several salutary results. Obviously, as all disappointed Democrats now appear to admit, Biden
should have dropped out of the race earlier. But the same media relaying this judgment do not
point a finger at themselves for aiding and abetting his clueless clinging to power.
Say,
What Happened To 'Closest Election In History'? For months running up to the Nov. 5
election, the "experts" told us that this would be the closest in history. Over and over again they
said it. Always with great certainty.
"This could be the closest presidential election since 1876"
"Uncertainty reigns in an election closer 'than any I have ever seen'"
"Kamala Harris vs. Donald Trump is the closest presidential race of the century"
"2024 Election Is The Closest Presidential Race In At Least 60 Years: Polls"
"Coping with election-related anxiety in a razor-thin race"
"Razor-thin race between Harris and Trump should motivate Democrats ahead of Election Day"
"Dead-heat poll results are astonishing — and improbable, these experts say"
"America's dead-heat Trump-Harris election"
"Poll shows presidential race in dead heat"
Turns out, it wasn't close at all. Trump is currently ahead by 3.5 points in the
popular vote. That will tighten as the millions of votes in deep-blue states such as California,
Washington, and Oregon continue to be counted, but if it holds it will be the first time since 2004
that a GOP candidate won the popular vote and only the second time since 1988. But unless you
failed civics class, you'd know that we don't elect presidents by national popular vote. And
if Nevada, Arizona, and Michigan end up in the Trump camp — he's currently leading in all
three states plus Alaska — Trump will end up with 312 electoral votes.
2024's
Biggest Loser Is The Corporate Media Industrial Complex. In the early hours of
Wednesday morning, legacy news networks were already sliding toward 2016 levels of melting down
about the increasingly definite prospect of a presidential victory by Donald J. Trump. For
them, Harris' stinging defeat is personal — because it's just as much a defeat for them
as it is for her. The corporate media industrial complex has spent Donald Trump's entire
political career trying to destroy him. Hand-in-hand with triple-letter government agencies
and Democrats, they ran a hoax painting Trump as a Russian stooge based on ridiculous rumors
commissioned by his opponent's campaign in 2016. They continued to spread the lie for the duration
of his presidency, awarding each other Pulitzers for it. And they've only ramped up their
efforts since then. The problem they're reckoning with tonight is this: those efforts didn't
work. They're no longer able to control Americans by controlling their information intake,
because their credibility is farther deep-sixed than the Clinton family's enemies list.
Media
Misinformation Undermines Our Democracy. Have you ever wondered why the media seems
to feel so emboldened when broadcasting unfounded claims about public figures like Donald Trump, as
if they're shielded from any consequence? The answer lies in a questionable Supreme Court
decision from 1964 — NY Times v. Sullivan — which established a novel
and radical interpretation of the First Amendment that has, for six decades, let media outlets
slander public figures with impunity. The Constitution guarantees freedom of speech, yes, but
nowhere in its text does it explicitly allow the press to defame individuals without
consequence. Yet in 1964, in a 9-0 decision authored by Justice William Brennan, a Supreme
Court dominated by activist judges established a precedent without clear constitutional grounding,
declaring that public figures could only succeed in defamation suits if they could prove "actual
malice" — that is, that the media knowingly lied or acted with reckless disregard for
the truth. The justices defined this standard of "actual malice" in a way that makes it
exceedingly difficult for any public figure to win a defamation case.
Fight!
Fight! Fight! Vs. Fake, Fake, Fake. In the place of news that
greatly matters, the propaganda press has filled the airwaves with demonstrable lies in the days
leading up to the election. Fake journalists lie about President Trump taking away birth
control and forcing women to have babies against their will. After covering up Joe Biden's
dementia for years, they now lie about Donald Trump showing fake signs of fatigue. They
parrot the FBI's fake crime statistics and lie to Americans about the safety of their
communities. They parrot the CDC's fake COVID statistics and lie to Americans about the
success of lockdowns, mask mandates, and fake vaccines. They parrot fake jobs reports and lie
to Americans about economic growth. Despite the fact that Kamala Harris has the lowest
approval rating for any modern vice president, our fake journalists lie to Americans about her
remarkable popular appeal. And after mocking President Trump for being the victim of two
separate assassination attempts, the propaganda press now pushes the lie that his words somehow
threaten RINO Liz Cheney's life. The Deep State spews blatant lies, and the propaganda press
treats those blatant lies as irrefutable truths.
Here's
A List Of Every Garbage Journalist Who Lied About Trump's Liz Cheney Chickenhawk Comments.
Democrats' propaganda press is completely lying about comments Trump made about neocon and former
Rep. Liz Cheney in an interview with Tucker Carlson. Trump called Cheney a "radical war
hawk" and pointed out how easy it is to make decisions about the lives of American troops when you
are sitting in a cozy, insulated office and have no sense of how it feels on the field of battle to
face the life and death consequences of decisions made in Washington. "Let's put her with a
rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her. Let's see how she feels about it, you
know, when the guns are trained on her face," Trump said. "You know, they're all war hawks when
they're sitting in Washington, in a nice building saying, 'Oh, gee, well, let's send —
let's send 10,000 troops right into the mouth of the enemy.'" Anyone with a basic grasp of
English and a bit of context understands what Trump was conveying.
Corporate
Media's Shameless Liz Cheney Hoax Is What Real 'Disinformation' Looks Like. One of
the most powerful and corrupt players in American politics is spreading a sensational lie to
manipulate voters four days before the final day of voting in the 2024 presidential election.
The lie is that Donald Trump threatened to execute dynastic war hawk Liz Cheney by firing squad,
and the culprit is America's propaganda press. Anyone who watches the clip of what Trump said
will discern that he was obviously suggesting Cheney pick up a rifle and join the thousands of
young Americans she's sent overseas to fight in forever wars. Anyone who interprets it
differently is either lying or so stupid he should take a lifelong vow of silence starting today.
"She's a radical war hawk," Trump said of Cheney on Thursday night. "Let's put her with a
rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her, OK? Let's see how she feels about it, you
know, when the guns are trained on her face. You know, they're all war hawks when they're
sitting in Washington in a nice building saying, 'Oh gee ... let's send 10,000 troops right into
the mouth of the enemy.'" Cheney, beside herself at the thought of having to do what she asks
young American men and women to do, ripped the first half of Trump's comment from its context and
claimed Trump had "threaten[ed]" her "with death." The corporate media didn't issue one of
their infamous "fact" "checks" or call Cheney out for her disinformation. They quickly joined
in on the lie that Trump had "fantasized" about putting Cheney in front of a firing squad.
You
Are Forewarned: If Kamala Harris Loses, the Democrats Will Try to Kill Free Speech
ASAP. Upon being badly trounced in a national election, members of the losing party
have one of two choices: They can be introspective, take a long, hard look at themselves in
the mirror, and undergo an honest, no-holds-barred critique of all their missteps, poor tactics,
and ineffective messaging. Or they can lie to themselves. Candid, unflinching
self-analysis is torturous. It puts you face-to-face with your own failings; there's nowhere
to hide, nowhere else to point the finger. And in a presidential campaign with thousands of
people, hundreds of regions, and countless moving parts, it also requires you to hold your team
members accountable. Which is why lying is so popular! Whenever the media talks
about lying, they always portray it in a negative light. (What gives?) Because when you really
stop and think about it, lying is a GREAT way to make people believe something that's totally untrue!
Trump
Is Right. There Is an 'Enemy Within' the United States.
[Scroll down] The idea that those people might try to use violence to impact the
election is so realistic that it should be considered probable, especially if it's close.
Funnier still is the idea that "Trump would use the military against his enemies on election day,"
since that's what the question was about — election day violence. Donald Trump,
win or lose, will not be President on election day. I realize reality has no impact on the
pearl-clutching class on Morning Joe, but for everyone else that should be an important
factoid. While the goon squad mob on the left are undoubtedly an enemy within our country, so
too is the left-wing industrial complex that props it up. The media — so-called
journalists — people who coined and echoed the phrase "mostly peaceful" as people's
lives were destroyed, businesses were destroyed and dozens were murdered. Anyone who could
look at that and turn an indifferent eye has something broken in them nothing will fix.
Laura
Loomer Files $150 Million Defamation Lawsuit Against Bill Maher After He Suggests Secret Trump
Affair. Laura Loomer filed a $150 million lawsuit against Bill Maher and HBO
after the comedian made comments suggesting that Loomer "might be" having a secret affair with
former President Donald Trump. The lawsuit filed on Tuesday argues that Maher falsely claimed
Loomer was in an "arranged relationship" with Trump, during a "Real Time" talk show taping on
September 13th. [...] [Tweet with video clip] Loomer has accused Maher of
making the false statements with "malice" while causing her significant personal and professional
harm. Loomer's lawsuit goes on to assert that the allegations are "baseless" and "fabricated
for attention, notoriety, clicks, and profit." She also claims that Maher made disparaging
remarks in a subsequent segment on the comedic political talk show, titled "24 things you didn't
know about Laura Loomer."
Did
The New York Times Publish a Hoax? I am not a ballistics expert and don't play one on
TV. I didn't even sleep in a Holiday Inn Express, so what I write here is based entirely on the
analysis of others. [Advertisement] But I am pretty sure they are right, given the balance
of the evidence and the provenance of the opinion piece published by the New York Times.
[Tweet] At issue is a piece published by the Times in which 65 medical personnel who have
worked in Gaza during the Israeli operation accuse soldiers of deliberately targeting Gazan
children, shooting them in the head. There are lurid stories and X-ray images that purport to
show bullets lodged in the head and neck of children. Those X-rays appear to be —
according to doctors and ballistics experts — totally fake. And even I, a layman,
can [challenge] them due to obvious problems that a 10-year-old can spot. Look at the linked
photos in the above tweet, and you will immediately notice a few things: there are no entry or
exit wounds, despite the claim that a military rifle supposedly shot these children with a bullet
designed to penetrate armor. The bullets show no deformation and appear to have been placed
under the body.
4 Years
After The Biden Laptop Coverup, Media Election Interference Is Worse Than Ever. Just
last week, CBS News used deceptive video splicing to replace one of Democrat presidential candidate
Kamala Harris' answers on "60 Minutes" with one that sounded less awful. A preview clip
of the interview showed Harris responding to a question with nonsensical babble, but when the full
interview aired, that answer was nowhere to be seen, having been replaced by a completely different
response. The original answer was also missing from the transcript released by the network,
and CBS continues to refuse to release an undoctored transcript. The most outrageous election
interference from the press this cycle might be the pile-up on Trump by ABC News "moderators" when
Trump met Harris for a singular presidential debate in September. They lobbed "fact checks"
at Trump left and right while refusing to question Harris' many falsehoods. Throughout the
debate, the format resembled ABC's David Muir and Linsey Davis asking Trump to explain how he could
possibly be so horrible and then giving Harris a chance to opine on whether she thought Trump was
horrible and why.
They
Are Lying To You About Hurricane Helene. After what we have just witnessed, how will
anyone be able to trust those that are running the country ever again? Hurricane Helene's
extremely unusual journey left an immense trail of destruction that was more than 500 miles
long, and there are many communities that were completely and utterly wiped out. Authorities
are telling the mainstream media that only a few hundred people died, and so that is what the
mainstream media is telling us. But those that are on the ground in the areas that got hit
the hardest are telling us a completely different story. For example, one woman in Asheville,
North Carolina says that thousands of people are missing and that there are still "bodies hanging
from trees they haven't gotten to yet" [...] Another local woman is claiming that there are more
than 900 bodies at a local hospital in Asheville which still have not been identified[.] [...]
Please keep in mind that Asheville is just one of the cities that was absolutely devastated by this
storm. There are hundreds of others that are dealing with dead bodies as well.
Hilarious
job numbers from the Bureau of Labor. As the media campaign so vigorously for
Democrats and cheer how great the Biden-Harris policies have been, suddenly, the Department of
Labor comes out with an unemployment report that blows away expectations. Biden and Harris
were out bragging as a significant number of people still can't pay their bills without running up
new debt or going delinquent on the debt they already had. Supposedly, 254,000 jobs were
created in September. Isn't that amazing, that this report came out one month before the
election? Of course, the media gave the headline number and never got into the details.
Here is one important detail: government jobs showed a gain of 785,000 because of the second
biggest seasonal adjustment on record. (It is easy to manipulate numbers when you have
"seasonal adjustments.") This would mean that private-sector employment declined 531,000 with
seasonal adjustments. I would say that is not too much to brag about. Somehow, the
voters don't get to see that number, but they know that the economy has sucked the past four years
because they can't pay their bills.
The
Democrats Defraud the Voters With A Little Help From Their Friends. In 2016 the
Democrats fabricated the Trump-Russian collusion hoax. That's far more serious than lying
about how a politician voted years ago. The CIA furthered this lie by enlisting foreign
security agencies to generate contacts between Russians and peripheral Trump campaign members to
create suspicion against Trump. After the election, the Democrats used the same fabrication
to hamstring Trump's administration and try to drive him from office. The CIA issued false
leaks to the MSM claiming growing evidence of Trump-Russian collusion. The MSM eagerly
published stories day after day claiming "the walls were closing in" on Trump. But the walls
were not closing in. The claim was a lie. The MSM is so brazen that when New York Times
and Washington Post reporters were awarded Pulitzers for their falsehoods, they proudly kept them
even as their falsehoods were exposed.
BBC
blames child marriage in Bangladesh on climate change. WHATEVER the BBC report on
climate change, it is pretty good advice to assume the opposite is true! BBC World Service
broadcasts a weekly radio programme called The Climate Question. A couple of weeks ago the
topic was child marriage in Bangladesh, with the claim that extreme weather 'fuelled by climate
change' was making farming impossible in many parts of the Bangladesh. Consequently people
were moving off the land and into towns. As a result, supposedly, young girls were being
married off. But far from farming becoming impossible, the opposite is the case. Cereal
production continues to rise every year to new records, and the area harvested is also
increasing. To cap it all, poverty levels have declined by a factor of eight since the
1980s. Bangladesh is a success story, but you won't hear that from the BBC. Everything the
BBC has reported is a lie. They obviously have a problem with admitting the truth about child
brides in Muslim countries, so why not blame it all on global warming instead?
On
State Department Censorship and Blacklisting. Last Friday, Josh Christenson at the
New York Post published "State Department tried to discredit reporters, Republican pol over
conservative 'blacklist.'" The article described an internal memo showing the State Department
strategizing public relations responses to the Washington Examiner's Gabe Kaminsky, me, and
Republican congressman Jim Banks. The memo criticizes Banks in an extremely devious
way. The Indiana Republican last February was quoted by Gabe in the Examiner saying
the Biden administration appeared to be "knee deep" in efforts to "crack down" on speech. The
State Department memo listed the Banks quote among its list of criticisms to answer. However,
the agency didn't quote the Examiner. It claimed to be quoting the Russian news agency
RIA-Novosti, giving the impression that Banks offered his criticism of Biden in Russian state
media: [Exhibit] But Banks never spoke to RIA-Novosti, or any Russian agency. His
quotes only appear in wholesale Russian translations (read: thefts) of Gabe's Examiner
article. [...] A miffed Banks just responded with a letter to Secretary of State Anthony Blinken.
"The State Department, in defense of its domestic so-called 'disinformation' operation,
purposefully spread disinformation about a U.S. lawmaker," he wrote, adding that "this is a sloppy
and hypocritical lie and it is typical of the Biden-Harris State Department's repeated attacks on
the First Amendment."
The
New Yorker Doesn't Care About Facts When They're Making [Stuff] Up About Trump.
Perhaps no period in modern journalism has exposed major structural problems in the media as the
Trump era. Since Trump careened into American politics in 2016, reporters have thrown story
after story trying to ensnare Trump with Russia's Putin. Many of these stories never held up
to honest inquiry. As investigative journalist Jeff Gerth examined in scrupulous
detail — a 24,000 word, three part series, in the Columba Journalism Review to be
exact — top American journalists misled the public while claiming to cover Trump fairly,
dispassionately, and — most important — accurately. Gerth notes that
some of these reporters went on to win awards for their failed Trump stories. You likely
haven't read Gerth's series in Columbia Journalism Review (CJR) and that's for good cause.
Many journalists who wrote misleading stories on Trump refused to speak with Gerth, likely because
they'd be hard pressed to defend dubious articles that led to coveted journalism prizes and promotions.
The
second assassination attempt was not 'apparent'. Everywhere I look for news updates
on the Trump assassination attempt I'm confronted by the word "apparent." Headlines all over
legacy media (my browser's cache was chockful of them) disseminate variations of "Trump's
apparent assassination attempt..." Up until at least 0930 PST, the day after. My
goodness, the would-be assassin is a Dem donkey's ass-assin, without the wit to repugn the verbal
violence from Dem asses against President Trump. That's apparent, but his acting out is
manifest. The ass-assin wasn't out there shooting birdies with his AK-47 from the
out-of-bounds rough on the golf course. There was nothing "apparent" about it —
his intentions (corroborated by his social media profile) were bleedin' obvious.
That
media 'narrative' about pets going uneaten by Haitian migrants in Ohio is starting to fall
apart. Yes, they're getting eaten. ABC News debate moderator David Muir made a
big deal of "fact-checking" President Trump when he cited reports at last night's debate that pets
were being eaten by Haitian migrants in Springfield, Ohio, whose flooding 20,000-strong presence
was creating many problems for the city of 58,000. [...] Well, now it turns out that Muir the
self-appointed fact-checker who cited a city manager's claim that he didn't get any reports about
it didn't know what he was talking about. President Trump, however, did. Reports from a
wide variety of sources are starting to emerge about pets and park wildlife such as ducks and geese
being stolen, dismembered, chopped, cooked, eaten and used for bizarre voudou ceremonies to summon
evil spirits by Haitian migrants, some of them flown in from Haiti by as "parolees" by Joe Biden
and Kamala Harris.
It
is a joke when journalists claim they care about journalistic integrity. A media that
spread lies about Russian collusion for years with no evidence does not have integrity.
Journalists who buried the story about the Hunter Biden laptop and Biden family corruption as they
campaigned for Joe is not honest. They have known that the Biden family pockets were lined
with kickbacks for years but continue to perpetuate the lie that Joe was not involved and did
nothing wrong. Journalists who have spread the lie for fourteen years that the Affordable
Care Act makes health care cheaper while prices have skyrocketed are just Democrat campaign
workers. Anyone who pretends that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are moderates is intentionally
spreading misinformation to voters. No matter what Joe said or did during his first three and
a half years in office, the complicit media claimed that he was an excellent president and sharp as
a tack. They continued this lie until the debate. Journalists who continued to say that
Kamala was a drag on the ticket now say she is fabulous. That is not honesty.
Newspaper
article preposterously equates KKK members with Christianity, patriotism. No matter
how much you disdain and despise the mainstream media[,] it is not enough. Not nearly
enough. Case in point: the newly rebranded "Minnesota Star Tribune" recently ran an article —
on the front page of the 'A' section — about the history of the KKK in Minnesota. The
headline read "Her mission: Documenting history of KKK in Minnesota." Clever. The piece
never mentioned the Democrat party, never once noted that the party was the home of the KKK, the pro-slavery
party, the Jim Crow party, the anti-integration party, the anti-reconstruction party. Misinformation.
Disinformation. Mal-information. Lying by omission. Shameful. Instead, the article
hinted throughout that it was those with the mindset of today's Trump Republicans that were responsible for
the horrors of extreme discrimination.
The
Los Angeles Times blames Republicans for California's woes. One of the hallmarks of
narcissism is that when things go wrong, it's always someone else's fault. Being a narcissist
means never having to say you're sorry. Nothing more perfectly illustrates this truism than
an essay from yesterday's Los Angeles Times blaming Republicans for California's myriad woes.
While the author is correct that, when Republicans had the chance, they didn't make smart
decisions, the reality is that it's the Democrats who have led California to the desperate place
it's in now. Steve Lopez's essay doesn't make the mistake of blaming Republicans for all the
state's problems. He concedes that Democrats have long controlled the former Golden State,
which is plagued by homelessness, crime, out-of-control housing costs, and poverty. He
contends, however, "that none of that happened overnight, nor did it happen exclusively under
Democratic leadership." Lopez believes that Republican mismanagement during the times that
Republicans controlled the government is as much to blame as Democrat mismanagement. The easy
challenge to that argument is that, since 1970, the legislature has had a Democrat majority, which
became a vetoproof supermajority in 2018.
MSM
tells only part of the story, highlights 'record number of deaths' from 'climate
change'. The Hill recently ran an article by Zack Budryk, which highlighted the
"record number of Americans killed by heat" last year; here's what he had to say:
["]Extreme heat killed more Americans in 2023 than any other year over nearly a quarter
century of records, according to research published Monday in the Journal of the American Medical
Association. At least 2,325 people died from the heat last year, according to the study,
which included deaths with heat as both an underlying and contributing factor.["] If
you didn't already figure it out, this piece was on "climate change," and its purpose, like most
pieces on climate change, is to get people to capitulate to the radical green agenda. Why
don't journalists ever report on the number of people killed each year by extreme cold, which is
much higher than heat deaths? The answer is that facts don't matter when the media and other
Democrats are trying to force people to surrender to their agenda.
The
Media Lies Add Up. During the 2020 Democratic primaries, the general election, and
throughout the first three years of the Biden administration, it was evident that Joe Biden was
physically and mentally incapable of serving as president. Yet his aides and the media all
misled the American people. They insisted that Biden was vigorous and sharp. Then
suddenly in June 2024, within a 24-hour period, Biden was declared by these same insiders as
unfit to continue as the Democratic nominee. Their new problem with Biden was not just his
long-standing embarrassing dementia. Rather bad polls increasingly warned that voters no
longer believed their lies and thus would likely not reelect Biden but would instead punish most
Democrats in the upcoming 2024 election. So, a new media narrative arose: the once-hale
Biden was forced to resign as the Democrat nominee. His once widely caricatured vice
president, Kamala Harris, just as abruptly was coronated as his replacement candidate by an equally
suddenly gushing and colluding media. In sum, for some nine years, the media and the left
have successfully fed the country a succession of rank deceptions and conspiracies.
Hiding
Danchenko. Rolling Stone magazine has just published a hugely perfidious puff piece
about Steele dossier source, Igor Danchenko. Even by the standards of media puff pieces, the
article is notable for the sheer amount of misrepresentations of basic facts. Among many
other falsehoods, it misstates how the FBI found out about Danchenko and fails to acknowledge that
the FBI paid him several hundred thousand dollars. Most notably, the article attempts to
revive the notion that the dossier was credible, while omitting the crucial detail that Danchenko
himself disavowed the dossier in January 2017. However, what particularly caught our
attention was the timing of the piece. There seemed to be no apparent reason to publish such
an article now, several years after Danchenko faded from public view. Why the need to remind
everyone of this deeply sordid chapter in American history? Every time the media publishes a
puff piece for no apparent reason, we must assume they are attempting to preempt some negative
news. But what could this negative news be?
Minnesota
news station conveniently "loses connection" when state senator starts ripping them for being Tim
Walz puppets. No "state-run media" happening here folks. It's just Minnesota's
incredibly Democrat- and Tim Walz-friendly media having "technical difficulties" the moment anyone
challenges their neutrality. Check this out: [Tweet with video clip] [...] I'm not
sure that North Korean media could be this blatantly corrupt. Before the cut, Senator Jensen
got some great blows in. I can't imagine the panic going on in the newsroom when they
cut lost the feed.
The Editor says...
I worked in broadcasting for 48 years, much of the time occupied in establishing "live shot" signals
for remote pickup links, and I can assure you that live feeds of this sort, from a fixed point of
origination, NEVER fail without some advance warning (as in this case), except when someone
manually kills the feed. If a signal is about to drop, there's usually some disturbance in the
video or audio before they both disappear. Not this time. You can safely surmise this was
not a case of "technical difficulties" beyond the station's control. The feed was obviously cut
because the Republican politician was developing momentum and had to be stopped, as if the TV station
is owned and operated by socialist Democrats.
Mainstream
media misinformation, mendacity at PBS. PBS recently reported that, via a phone call,
former President Trump urged Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to delay a hostage deal
between Israel and Hamas until after the 2024 presidential election to benefit himself
politically. Turns out, that wasn't true. In any way, shape, or form. Knock me
over with a feather. Imagine my surprise when I found out that this, too, was a lie made out
of whole cloth! "PBS NewsHour" propagandist reporter Judy Woodruff
subsequently apologized for reporting the story about Trump and Netanyahu "that both leaders have
staunchly denied," according to Fox News.
Fear
and Trembling in the Deep State. During the [DNC convention in Chicago], Judy
Woodruff reported (using the most authoritative voice and concerned visage she could muster) that
Donald Trump had a telephone conversation with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during
which he told him to reject the Biden ceasefire deal because accepting it would help Biden's
reelection. Both Netanyahu and Trump denied the claim upon which Trump was instantly being
charged by the usual shills with a violation of the Logan Act. When pressed to substantiate
her charge, Woodruff "clarified" her remarks and said she'd relied on accounts in Axios and Reuters
and had done no independent verification. In fact, neither publication reported what she had
said was the content of the conversation. More damaging to the credibility of her
"clarification," days before her assertion both accounts had reported the men denied having any
phone conversation regarding the proposal. Did she misread the articles? I think it
obvious she repeated something someone in the administration told her, someone whose identity she
dares not reveal for fear of losing valuable access.
Fake
News: Judy Woodruff does a Dan Rather. [Scroll down] The [worst]
element of Woodruff's statement, that Trump urged Netanyahu to reject the ceasefire because it
would help Harris in the 2024 presidential campaign — never happened at all in
either report, not even by wink, hint, or suggestion, not in the corrected or uncorrected
versions. Nothing. Zilch. Zero. Nada. Trump never did that. And
they never reported that. Trump wouldn't even need to do that, as Bibi already knows which
presidential candidate would be better for Israel. I knew that claim was fake the minute I
read it and put on my skepticism goggles. It was completely made up by Woodruff. Yet
here Woodruff is, blaming other news agencies for her own error, focusing on some mild to
moderately fuzzy elements of the stories open to interpretation, and making a blanket claim that
Trump is busy interfering with the peace process in Gaza by phone, and for only the most venal and
selfish reasons, to advance his presidential campaign, when nothing of the kind happened nor was
ever reported to have happened.
No,
illegal immigration does not help the U.S. economy. The media and other Democrats
have been working very hard to say that Kamala has not been responsible for the open border policy
that allows millions of illegals, including terrorists and gang members, to flood our country.
Sanctuary cities and states have been whining continuously about Texas sending these illegals to
them and begging Gov. Greg Abbott to stop. They are complaining about how much these
illegals are costing and how they are running out of room. They are begging the federal
government for money. The voters aren't buying these lies so now the Los Angeles Times comes
to the rescue with a fictional piece of trash describing how great these illegals have been for the
country. Of course, they don't use the term 'illegal' in their article.
The
Guardian Newspaper Says "Two-Tier Policing" Is a Myth Following Years of Making That Exact Claim.
The riots in the United Kingdom have brought the concept of two-tier policing into the limelight
once again as the government seems more concerned in targeting those protesting against the
consequences of mass immigration than actual criminals. As we reported earlier, U.K. Prime
Minister Keir Starmer has promised a crackdown on rioters with "standing armies" of police officers
and 24-hour turnarounds in the courts. His focus, however, on right-wing rioters has leant
itself to the nickname "two-tier Keir." When it was Brits rioting over the death of George
Floyd, a man who didn't even live on the same continent as them, Starmer said "Like you, I was shocked
and angered at the killing of George Floyd, and the response of President Trump and the US authorities
to the peaceful protesters, to people rightly demanding justice, has been an affront to humanity.
Liberal
Gaslighting Goes Global. The problem with many liberals is they can't live in their
own truth. They abandon ship as soon as it becomes inconvenient to maintain their current
persona. The most obvious and telling recent examples come from the Democrat Presidential
candidate-by-fiat, Kamala Harris. For the last three and a half years, she was 'The Border
Czar.' Everyone knew it. Biden announced it with much ballyhoo, and she was referred to
as 'The Border Czar' by the television, print, and electronic media repeatedly. As the Vice
President, she ran interference for Joe Biden. (He didn't create the huge border fiasco; she
did.) [...] Any stain of failure, especially one tied to the massive disaster of the southern
United States border, was a huge threat to her Presidential aspirations. So, the Democrat
political machine, together with their legacy media propaganda juggernaut, went full George Orwell
on John Q. Public. CNN, MSNBC, the New York Times, the New Yorker, Axios, and a score of
other legacy media began trumpeting: 'Kamala Harris was never the Border Czar!' Unfortunately
for the gaslighters, and thanks to the internet, there are an abundance of records of them dubbing
her with that title.
The
Media Still Turn Tricks For The Democrat Party. [Scroll down] That's how
business works. Toe the line, or you're out! The same can be said of all the
self-important newscasters, anchors, and hosts whose media bosses quite literally give them their
marching orders — or, more accurately, their talking orders. Not just talking
orders, but word-for-word memes, which is why no matter which lefty network or cable show you turn
to, they're all using the same vocabulary, the same expressions, and the same keywords. I
first noticed this when Dick Cheney was chosen as George W. Bush's VP candidate. Suddenly,
the media talking heads discovered the word "gravitas"! We still witness this echo chamber every
day. Objectivity has never been part of the media's agenda, only slavish obeisance to their
bosses. Watch for yourself. In fact, take notes. There is a remarkable absence of
originality in today's political reportage. It's all an echo chamber of talking points and
leftist propaganda that the anchors and reporters have received beforehand and have literally been
commanded to utilize at the risk of their jobs. There's not an original word, phrase, or sentence!
Turns
Out We Were Right: Dems Were Playing The Long Con. Back in February, we noticed
a spate of articles claiming that there was no way that Joe Biden would not be the Democrats'
nominee. "In the span of two days," we wrote, "articles started appearing making the exact
same argument: That Joe Biden will definitely, no questions asked, be the nominee come
November." We noticed that these articles — all written by supposed political
pros — made the same argument:
• It's too late for Biden to step aside.
• Party elites are all behind Biden.
• There's no way Biden would ever drop out.
• Nobody wants Kamala Harris to be the nominee.
Horsefeathers, we said, Democrats' only interest is in defeating Donald Trump and keeping power,
and they will do whatever it takes to achieve that. [...] Today's mainstream journalists are the
domestic version of Baghdad Bob. The public must learn to start treating them that way.
Slow
news month. [Scroll down] What goes less noticed is the undisguised
political bias of today's "news" media. Pertinent information? Nah! They're in
business just to further the partisan leftist agenda. There is no longer the annual summer
season, but rather a three-month severe heat wave. Kamala Harris is certainly not a cackling
nincompoop. She's the most able holder of the destiny of civilization. She's not some
hack politician. Instead, she's a "person of color" and of Asian descent... not to mention
also a female human being. This pandering is, of course, protected by the First Amendment.
What is not protected is the intangible concept of credibility. It keeps getting
harder and harder to take these sources seriously.
It's
Hoaxes All the Way Down. Since at least 2015 there is pretty much nothing we read in
the mainstream media about politics that is unquestionably true. That's not to say that
nothing true has been printed. You could produce reams of stories in which the basic facts
are defensibly true, although you could probably produce many more reams in which many, most, or
all of the facts were lies. It's just that almost everything written about politics,
medicine, public health, the border, Israel, and so many other major issues are driven by
narratives completely unrelated to what is really going on. From the Steele Dossier to "safe
and effective," everything we are fed by the mainstream media is built on some hoax or another.
There
Never Was A Mythical Time When 'The News Was Just the News'. Freedom is messy.
As much as anyone, I'd love to have the news media simply present facts to American and world
citizens in the form of easily digestible tidbits, allowing us to discern narratives and
conclusions as individuals. But that's simply never been the way that the news media worked
in America or anyplace else. Our Founders were brilliant men who weren't given to fantasies
about utopia, and they were realists about the fallen condition of humankind. You and I may
foolishly imagine that it's possible to have a large, nationally syndicated news media that would
be stalwartly objective and without projecting any sort of bias. But the Founders recognized
this as impossible.
The
Attempted Assassination. The mainstream media has abandoned their raison d'être:
to be an objective, independent source of information to keep citizens informed about societal matters.
In that scenario, better-educated citizens would join together to take action to support improved living
conditions — e.g., by voting for responsible representatives. Instead, the mainstream media
has determined that citizens are incompetent and/or could care less, so they have appointed themselves as
the judge and jury as to what needs to be done to improve society. Of course, they never fully disclose
their agendas, as that would expose the reality that they are bluff bidding on a bust hand. That they
continually attack an individual like Trump, is now just an everyday matter. That they dishonestly
portray him in numerous ways (e.g., Hitler), is so commonplace that we think little of it. "Existential
threat" rhetoric is not only false, but specifically intended to inflame[.]
To
Call Them Journalists Is A Misnomer. [Scroll down] When you listen to the
commentary on the mainstream media (the Left supporters) about an event you saw in person, you
would think you were at different versions of the same. An example is the assassination
attempt of Donald Trump. We heard the shots and saw the President grab his ear and drop to
the stage for safety. He reflexively knew to get down behind the bulletproof protection.
The Secret Service agents immediately surrounded him, but he quickly got up and pumped his fist
to the crowd with blood streaming down his face. According to CNN, the President was injured,
not shot, and MSNBC said the President fell. They did whatever they could to downplay the
attempt to kill Donald Trump and the way he responded. It is pathetic and obvious.
Here's
How The Media Are Lying Right Now: RNC Edition. Now that Republicans have formally
nominated Donald Trump for president and the party's convention went off this week without a hitch, it's
a good time to check in on how the media processed these past few days. Spoiler: not well.
You
May Think You Hate the Media, But You Can't Hate It Enough, Chapter 12,186. When I
first started seeing clueless mainstream media headlines pop up on Twitter Saturday afternoon I
assumed most of them were fakes, attempts at bad satire, or the Babylon Bee trying to get ahead of
things. But no — these are real: [Screenshots]
Leftist
Media Downplays Trump Assassination Attempt. Elements of the international media did
an impeccable job of covering the attempted assassination of former U.S. president Donald
Trump — an attack which also saw one person killed and two seriously injured. To
his credit, the BBC's senior North America correspondent Gary O'Donoghue conducted an insightful
on-the-ground interview with a witness shortly after the gunshots rang out. [Tweet with
video clip] Many have also praised the first-class photographers who potentially risked
their lives to secure instantly iconic images that will be printed in the history books.
[Tweets] Other elements acted shamefully, as readers would expect them too — either
downplaying the seriousness of the event or putting a portion of the blame on Trump himself.
Even after footage had emerged which made it quite clear — even if on a very basic
level — what had happened, various mainstream media publications pumped out such
euphemistic headlines as these:
CNN: "Secret Service Rushes Trump Off Stage After He Falls at Rally"
USA Today: "Trump Removed From Stage by Secret Service After Loud Noises Startles Former President, Crowd"
Associated Press: "Donald Trump Has Been Escorted Off The Stage During A Rally After Loud Noises Ring Out In The Crowd"
These and other headlines prompted recent Trump-backer Elon Musk to criticise the "legacy media"
as "a pure propaganda machine." [Tweet]
The
Legacy Media Has Passed the Point of No Return. A massive poll of 20,000 participants
undertaken by the Knight Foundation and Gallup found that Americans' hope for and trust in an
objective media was all but lost by 2020. They saw not only an ever-growing partisanship in
news reporting but a determination by the legacy media to push a political agenda instead of
honestly disseminating the news. This poll was one of the most devastating indictments of the
media in polling history. Some highlights:
84% of surveyed Americans laid either a moderate or a great deal of the blame for partisan hostility at the feet of the media.
Further, 82% believed news outlets are either deliberately "misrepresenting the facts" or are "making them up entirely".
This is further amplified as 79% of those surveyed said media outlets are trying to
persuade people to adopt a certain opinion about an issue or an individual.
Similarly, while the respondents in the poll believed that the media is "critical" or "very important"
to democracy, 86% say they have witnessed either a fair amount or a great deal of bias in news reporting.
This
Won't Be The Last Time Democrats Attempt To Assassinate Trump. It shouldn't be news
by now but if it is: These people aren't playing games. [...] Democrats and
anti-Trumpers have spent the past three years calling the political opposition a life-or-death
threat. They claim they'll be imprisoned and people will die if their opposition gains power,
while they themselves attempt to imprison and now kill the opposition. They called him a
fascist. They called him a dictator. They called him Hitler. Literally the front
page of New Republic magazine — still influential in Washington, believe it or
not — this month portrayed Trump with a tiny mustache to drive home the point. The
vertigo you're feeling is normal. We don't know yet much about the motives of the
shooter. Perhaps he was simply insane, though it's doubtful. If he turns out to be
politically motivated, there's nothing confusing or inexplicable about this even as news anchors
will surely say in the coming days that "we all" bear blame. We don't all bear blame.
This is one side acting out in fatal violence just as they did through 2020 and just as they did
after Trump was elected in 2016.
Our
Brezhnev, Our Pravda, Our Soviet Union. [Scroll down] Something similar
has happened to a calcified America under President Joe Biden. Like the late-stage Brezhnev,
Biden is now a president in name only. He has outsourced his administration to a vestigial
hard-left apparat from the Obama years. Now, Biden can no longer even perform his assigned
ceremonial tasks of putting a moderate veneer on radical, nihilist agendas that are stagnating the
country. Yet our Pravda journalists have sworn to the American people that, in private, the
reclusive, three-day-a-week Biden outpaces the energy and drive of those half his age.
Obsequious staffers plant stories in the Soviet-like ears of reporters about Biden's singular
dynamism. Any dissenters are publicly demonized as peddlers of "cheap fakes." When
Biden's reclusiveness prompts too much gossip that he is near senile, he is wheeled out for a
staged interview that must be edited before release. Or he answers questions secretly shown
to him in advance. On sporadic occasions where the state media and the Biden nomenklatura
cannot control events — such as rare presidential debates or international
summits — our Pravda media go into overdrive to convince the public that what they see
and hear is not real.
The
Loss of Political Trust. Trump's epitaph must include credit for injecting "fake
news" into the lexicon. You are reading these words via alternative media born in response to
the industrialization of fake news. The news business is zero-sum. Every lost NY Times
or Washington Post subscriber becomes a Twitter, YouTube, Rumble, Gateway Pundit, etc.
viewer. The industry just experienced a staggering crisis of trust over the Biden
coverup. The overall financial implications of continuous erosion of trust in government have
yet to be grasped. For homework, online search: fake+u.s.+government+economic+statistics.
Especially significant will be the coming de facto credit downgrading resulting from the Biden
fiasco. Credit is from the Latin credere, to believe. Biden shines a spotlight on
government/media lies of all flavors, awakening creditors to our extreme government trust deficit.
Milwaukee
Radio Station Admits To Editing Interview With Joe Biden At Request Of White House.
Joe Biden participated in two radio interviews following his debate with Donald Trump, a debate
that raised significant questions within the Democrat Party about the president's ability to win
re-election. The first interview was with WURD, an all-black radio station in
Pennsylvania. The host of the interview, Andrea Lawful-Sanders, admitted she asked the
president questions sent to her from the White House. The radio station fired Sanders later
that week, acknowledging that agreeing to pre-determined questions jeopardized the credibility of
the outlet. The second interview was with CivicMedia, a progressive talk-radio network in
Wisconsin. The host of that interview, Earl Ingram, also confirmed that the White House
supplied him with questions that he asked Biden. [...] In addition, the Wisconsin station published
a press release on Thursday in which it admitted that it made two edits in an interview with Biden
at the request of his campaign.
Reporters
need to learn to apologize. Two weeks ago, Georgetown University held a symposium
about the state of journalism. When asked what the main problem facing the press is, Erik
Wemple, a media critic at the Washington Post, came up with a surprisingly compelling
and honest answer: Journalists need to learn how to apologize when they make mistakes. [...]
Wemple has hit on something profound. The media are not trusted, and all the conferences and
articles in the world are not going to help them out of their hole.
The Editor says... Lying is probably the news media's most common "mistake," for which they would need
to apologize; but the apologies don't come forth because most of the lying is done on behalf of
their preferred politicians.
Mediaite
Caught Lying in Blatant Distortion of Transcript of J.D. Vance Interview. Mediaite, a
leftist publication, has been caught lying in a blatant distortion of a transcript of an interview
that now-Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH) did years ago on MSNBC in an obvious attempt to interfere in
former President Donald Trump's vice presidential selection process. The left-leaning
anti-Trump publication ran a headline on Wednesday as part of the globalists' last-ditch effort to
stop Vance from getting selected as Trump's running mate in the 2024 presidential election that, if
true, would certainly make heads in Trump world turn: "JD Vance Said He Believes Trump's Sexual
Assault Accuser in Unearthed Interview." The problem with Mediaite's headline —
and its story — is that this is not an accurate reflection of what Vance said in a 2016
interview with then-MSNBC host Chris Matthews.
Russell
Brand Blasts Corporate Media for Normalizing Heart Failure in Young People. Britsh
comedian Russell Brand has accused the corporate media of pushing to normalize the global crisis of
young, healthy people dying suddenly from heart failure. Brand argues that rather than
highlight the fact that the surges in cardiac injuries and related only surged after the Covid mRNA
shots were rolled out, the corporate media is attempting to gaslight the public into believing it
is completely normal. During an episode of his "Stay Free" podcast this week, Brand said:
"On legacy media, it's quite possible to watch a kind of bright breezy, cheerful news item about
heart attacks as if it's like some new trend, as if it's Pogs or Pokemon Go or something.
"It's a new sensation, heart disease in young people."
The
Media Is Fully Exposed as Much as Biden in Debate. The debate showed everyone what
happens when the Democratic communications machine, formerly known as the media, is bypassed, and
candidates can be seen clearly by the American people without the filters. The media has been
lying — expect this word to come up a lot — to the American people on behalf
of Biden and Democrats for years. But the very second they are unable to control the content
and the narrative, the truth comes busting out for everyone to see. It was glorious and
horrific. President Trump could not have been more right when he said in April 2019 that
the media is "truly the enemy of the people." The Hill (media) said Trump was "ratcheting up his
use of the derisive label to attack the news media." There's some straight reporting. It
quickly evolved in the media narrative of Trump's war on the media, the go-to phrase of the lemming
journos. No. The Hill was wrong. It has long been the media's war on the American
people who are not bi-coastal elites. Trump was so right.
Barack
Obama and the Stupidity of the American Voter. Is the American media establishment
fair, balanced, and independent? Do the FBI, CIA, IRS, and Justice Department stand for the
rule of law, judicial fairness, and the American way? Is the GOP a formidable political foe,
working hard to contain the excesses of crazed liberal Democrats? No, not remotely, and you
gotta be kidding. The despicable media spread the lies they're given, enthusiastically and in
unison, often using the exact same language. It's almost as if they've been given a script to
follow. They have. If the current American justice system didn't have two standards,
why, it would have no standards at all! A simple comparison of the judicial treatment
afforded, say, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump makes that abundantly clear. You're free to
burn down a city, if you're BLM, but say prayers across the street from an abortion abattoir, and
you're going to prison. As for the GOP, those pretenders and senders of strongly worded
letters and subpoenas that are thrown into the circular file as soon as they're received, they have
a perfect avatar in former Senate leader Mitch McConnell: a chinless, bespectacled turtle.
Biden's
Failing Brain Exposes Deep State Treachery. [Scroll down] You knew
that Biden lost his marbles long ago, but the propaganda press has been telling the world that he's
just fine for years. [...] Just as reporters in the first half of the twentieth century lied to the
American people about FDR's reliance upon a wheelchair, reporters in the first quarter of the
twenty-first century have lied to the American people about Biden's debilitating dementia. On
June 27, the lid on journalists' barrel of Biden-protecting lies shot right off. Not
even halfway through Biden's debate disaster, his communications people were spreading a new
lie — that he was suffering from a cold — to explain away his enfeebled and
bewildered presence on stage. [...] but the guy had been hiding away at Camp David for over a
week! When you first tell the public that you are unable to perform your presidential duties
and prepare for a debate at the same time and then tell them that your weeklong debate camp
destroyed your immune system, you aren't in a position to inspire sympathy.
An
MSM fairytale. Since he shuffled into the White House in 2021 we all knew that there
was something off about this guy. [...] For the last several weeks, the MSM has been trying to
continue the Biden-as-competent fable by blaming Republicans for "cheap fakes." That was an
accusation that Republicans were toying with video and pics of the president to make him look
incompetent, as if any such effort was needed to expose his deterioration. Then the news
regarding Biden's absurd debate boot camp. Why would a professional politician for over
50 years require such an absurdly long and involved prep? The answer is that the MSM has
been complicit in the "fit as a fiddle" charade by fully embracing the regularly administered
marching orders and talking points from the White House. Many commentators are now
complaining that they were misled and cannot believe that they were lied to about Biden's
infirmaries. If this is true, it demonstrates a stunning level of naivete. If they were
lied to about something so obvious, what else are they lapping up off the floor?
The
Gaza Famine That Never Was. New evidence indicates that, contrary to claims by top
U.S. officials and international media, the Gaza Strip is not on the precipice of a widespread
famine that Western experts claimed would endanger millions of innocent Palestinians.
"Famine is imminent" in northern Gaza, the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), a
network of Western governments, the United Nations, and nonprofit groups, warned in March, prompting
unfounded accusations that Israel is using starvation as a war tactic. The IPC's report was
quickly amplified by outlets like the Washington Post, which foretold "imminent famine" in
Gaza. Politico, the New York Times, and CNN alleged Israel is guilty of war
crimes. But on Tuesday, the IPC revised its initial assessment, saying that the projected
famine in Gaza did not come to fruition in May. "The available evidence does not
indicate that Famine is currently occurring," the organization said in its latest report, which
notes that Israel has significantly increased aid and that conditions as a whole in Gaza have
drastically improved. This is the latest example of an international agency walking back its
initial assessment of the situation in Gaza.
What
to do about woke science journals. Let me define the "woke" in the title very broadly as promoting any of...
a) a favored narrative or questionable treatment (e.g., publishing only articles supporting
a huge climate change impact or government COVID-19 policies while rejecting high-quality articles with
solid evidence to the contrary);
b) CRT and DEI (e.g., employment processes and medical treatment; justifying BLM rallies during
a mandatory and supposedly necessary COVID lockdown);
c) the trans agenda (e.g., suppression of literature on psychological diagnoses or social
media influence; transition surgery for minors; birth certificate with the desired gender of the baby
or its parents; males in female sports);
d) TDS (e.g., numerous get-Trump Lancet editorials having nothing to do with medicine; the
Lancet by-passing its usual peer-review process to rush a negative study on hydroxychloroquine to print
after Trump said HCQ might work, only to have to retract it ten days later after the data were proven bogus);
e) rescinding already published or posted articles after pressure from advocacy groups.
There can be overlap between categories.
Wrong,
Mainstream Media, Tree Rings Aren't Reliable Indicators of Past Temperatures. Dozens
of media outlets such as ABC News, The BBC, The New York Times, and many more, hyped a study
that claims summer temperatures in 2023 were unprecedented over the past 2000 years.
This claim, in fact, can't be verified by tree ring data, which isn't that precise.
Researchers are falsely assuming tree rings are reliable temperature indicators when in fact tree
rings can indicate a multitude of different conditions, not just temperature.
BBC
Climate Disinformation Reporter Attacks Kenyan Farmer. On 15th June 2024, the
BBC Climate disinformation reporter Marco Silva published a hit piece on the Kenyan farmer Jusper
Machogu, entitled "How a Kenyan farmer became a champion of climate change denial." The reporter
claims that Mr Machogu, a 29-year-old farmer with many thousands of followers on X for his campaign
"Fossil Fuels for Africa," holds dangerous views denying climate change. I don't personally
know Mr Machogu, and I am certain that he doesn't need defense. I grew up without
electricity and I recently explained how I questioned the official climate narrative. I do
find it extremely disgusting that a senior journalist sitting in Greater London, using daily modern
technologies powered by fossil fuels, in a country that became rich thanks to fossil fuels (and
loot from Kenya), should write such a disdainful piece on one of the biggest media outlets on earth
about a young man who appears to have knowledge, hard work, and passion to serve his community and
people. I also find this piece below the BBC's editorial standards which include values such
as truth, fairness, accuracy, and impartiality.
The
intellectual dishonesty of Democrats proven once again. The Cleveland Plain Dealer
was forced on June 18, 2024 to retract entirely a June 9th op-ed written by Democrat
lawyer and political consultant Neil Baron when it was threatened with slander and libel lawsuits
from three FBI whistleblowers because of the blatent false accusations Baron included in this
op-ed. Baron's op-ed, which [one] can still read [elsew]here, was mostly a partisan attack on
Congressman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and his effort to expose the FBI's non-stop abuse of power.
In doing so, however, Baron accused three FBI whistle-blowers of doing things they did not do.
[...] In other words, Baron was making these accusations up, and the newspaper did no fact-checking
prior to publication, accepting those bald-faced lies without question. That they were lies
is illustrated by how fast the newspaper reacted when told they were lies, retracting the op-ed
only one day after it was approached by representatives of the whistle-blowers.
The dictionary just got a little heavier. Biden
Loyalist Media Are Gaslighting Us Again. Of all the the 2020 election's dirty tricks,
the nastiest was when the media and the IC abused public trust to suppress an entirely-true, but
highly damaging story about Hunter's laptop. Because Blinken leaned on his buddies to
suppress the story, the New York Post scoop about Hunter's laptop had been suppressed. Polls
have since told us that enough Biden voters in battleground states would have changed their vote
based on that laptop information that the Presidential race would have turned in Trump's
favor. The truth eventually came out — in the Hunter Biden prosecution this month,
ironically — but the Biden was sworn in and the damage was already done. One
Conservative voice has given it a name: Laptopping. [Tweet]
Obama
Seeks 4th Term. With Obama still at the helm, the fundamental transformation of
America continues. Meanwhile, the entire American news propaganda machine continues to act as
if they don't know, including Fox News personalities, referring to Biden as if he really is a
President, Harris as if she really is a Vice President, and the 2024 election as if there's any
legitimacy to U.S. elections since 2016. Oh, they know, but they don't dare tell it like it
really is, which is why the entire U.S. news industry has a popularity rating even below Biden's
anemic levels, and the talk-talk-talk but do-nothing Congress. People started turning to Tik
Tok and other social media platforms in a desperate search for any real news years ago.
That's why everyone in D.C. was united in the power grab of Tik Tok. Not because of so-called
"Chinese spying," but because it was the last place they didn't totally control the narrative for
public consumption.
No,
ScienceNews, Your "Ocean's Record-Breaking Hot Streak" Claims Are False. A recent
ScienceNews (SN) article claims that ocean temperatures are out of control in a year-long
record-breaking hot streak. This is false. Numerous ocean temperature data sets show no
such record-breaking values and the source SN cited to support its claims was thoroughly
discredited when it made similar "record breaking" claims last year. The entire claim of the
article is based on one data set, which is seen below in the SN article: [...] The problem is this
single source isn't even an "official" ocean temperature data data set, rather the source is:
Source: Climate Reanalyzer/Univ. of Maine ∙ Visualization: C. Crockett.
In fact, that isn't temperature data at all, but climate model output. The data SN cited
was not official data, but from a private website run by the University of Maine. Examining
actual data sets show that SN claim of record ocean heat is a gross error.
The
Feds Are Itching to J6 Us Again. [Scroll down] To this day, White House
spokespeople, members of Congress, federal judges, and television news anchors describe
January 6, 2021 as a "deadly insurrection." It does not matter to them that none of the J6
protesters was armed or that the only people killed were Trump-supporters. It does not matter
to them that the vast majority of J6 defendants were engaging in harmless acts of political
advocacy. It does not matter to them that there was never any nefarious plot to somehow
topple the federal government. Reprehensible prosecutors seeking outrageous sentences for
questionable trespass crimes and unsympathetic, partisan judges who insist on haranguing defendants
for engaging in imaginary sedition have railroaded scores of Americans for the "crime" of
exercising their free speech.
A
Slate writer gaslights about the allegedly great Biden economy. Zachary Carter,
writing for hard-left Slate, has issued his verdict on the economy: It's great. Wholly
contrary to popular belief, he assures us, "Inflation Is Not Destroying Joe Biden." So why
can't the rest of America see it? 'Tis a mystery to be solved, and he buries us under "data"
to make his point. Ultimately, his piece is a primal scream of horror that Americans insist
on believing the realities of their wallets over the cherry-picked data in his analysis.
First, Carter first declares that inflation is a thing of the past. "According to the Federal
Reserve's preferred measure, prices rose just 2.7 percent between April of 2023 and April of
2024." The problem with the Fed is that its "core" inflation number excludes the cost of
food, housing, and energy — the things that average Americans spend the vast majority of
their income purchasing.
June
temperatures [are] at half the level of this time last year. Temperatures in June 2024
are at half the level of 2023, the Met Office has said, although warmer weather is predicted
towards the end of the month. While London was experiencing 32C (89.6F) a year ago,
temperatures were around 16C (60.8F) in the capital on Tuesday. Similarly Cambridge had
temperatures of 30.3C (86.5F) on June 11 2023, and 15C (59F) on the same day in 2024.
Temperatures are around 2C (35.6F) below average for the time of year, with scattered showers this
week that could turn into heavy rain by Thursday, while some areas could see ground frosts.
The Editor says...
Somehow I would like to rebut the article above without including a cliché like cherry-picking.
Oops, too late. It's easy to find examples of a high (or low) temperature on some date that
was "half" (or "double") the temperature on the same day in the previous year. This is made
easier by the use of the Celsius temperature scale, in which the day-to-day ambient temperatures
are recorded with smaller numbers than in areas that use the Fahrenheit scale. But a decrease
from 32°C. to 16°C. does not mean it's only half as warm outside. On the absolute
(Kelvin) scale, that's a change from 305°K. to 289°K. Hardly any difference. This
is another example of the news media attempting to make problems sound worse than they really are,
and hoping you don't know why they are in error. These are the same people who sound the
alarm about a one-half degree average temperature increase by the end of this century. On the
absolute scale, it's almost no change at all. It's background noise, especially compared to
the temperature differences between day and night and between summer and winter.
What
the Biden Campaign Doesn't Want You to Know About His Philly Audience. As I reported
earlier, Joe Biden went to Philadelphia on Wednesday to try to make another pitch to black voters
to stop fleeing and vote for him and Kamala Harris. [...] In his photos, you can see the people are
all in the front of the gym, only about half of it is full and there's a big press bandstand, then
a whole press area with tables. The second photo on the top right shows most of the people
although there may be a little more on the left that are not shown. I'll leave it to you to
assess how many people there were, but it wasn't a lot. Certainly not "packed" or "huge."
Trump has more people waiting for him hours before his events start. In other words, as the
GOP noted, Joe Biden couldn't even fill up a school gym in Democrat-run Philadelphia.
The
Top 20 Lies of the 2020s. Lying is an epidemic even worse than COVID. Our
president and his press secretaries seem to lie with every word they say and deny facts that anyone
with a pair of eyes can see for himself. Scientists and doctors, formerly among the most
trusted members of our society, lie to foster popular environmental theories and get government
grants, or to promote Big Pharma and deter people from effective treatments. Our news media
no longer report the news; they shape the news as instructed. Here is just a sample of
commonly promoted lies starting in 2020. [...]
They
lie because they get away with it. The death of Morgan Spurlock showed why people in
the media lie. They get away with it and it pays well. He made a movie for $65,000
called Super Size Me and collected a hefty share of its $22 million gross at the box
office. The premise was he ate nothing but McDonald's food for 30 days and it ruined his
health. The food did not. He died of cancer not obesity. His liver likely was in
bad shape but it wasn't from milkshakes and Big Macs. It was from 40 years of drinking,
going back to when he was 13. Nevertheless, the media sold the lie for 20 years, and
continued the lie in his obituaries, although a few outlets included a paragraph or two buried in
the story that put his lie in perspective. [...] The media heavily promoted him and his movie when
it debuted 20 years ago. Overnight, journalists became instant dietitians —
just like they became instant virologists 4 years ago when covid 19 arrived from Wuhan.
How
the Propaganda System Works. This major new piece of distracting disinfotainment is
solid misinformation. It's fortified with pseudo-nutritional lies that support the Official
Narrative. On whatever... The Covid scamdemic/plannedemic. Or the "safe and
effective" vaccines that keep killing and maiming millions with heart damage, blood clots,
myocarditis, neurological disorders, paralysis, autoimmune disease, turbo cancers, infertility,
sterility, and death. Or the apocalyptic "killer virus" that never existed. It was just
another mild seasonal flu, if it existed at all. Or that whopper, life-threatening man-made
"global warming." Which morphed into the "climate change" hoax. Or the 2020 US presidential
election where vote-counting suddenly stopped in five or six key states so that rejiggering could
take place, but you were assured nothing untoward happened — and if you think it did
happen then you're a right-wing dupe misled by bad people and conspiracy theories. Or
"Israel's right to defend itself" as it carries out a televised genocide in full public view to
complete its extermination/removal/dispossession of the Palestinian people begun in 1947-1949.
[...] Inflation is firmly under control, thanks to our great "president" Joseph Robinette Biden, a
usurper/imposter like his CIA-groomed puppetmaster Barry Soetoro (aka Obama). Today a fast-food
meal — burger, fries, soda — costs nearly 20 bucks, going up to $26.99 real
soon as America's wars continue.
About
those 'all electric' 'zero emissions' fire trucks. They have diesel engines.
When Albuquerque announced plans to acquire a new fire engine, New Mexico's governor lauded the
"zero emissions" technology while a fire department spokesman called it "all electric" and KRQE 13
gushed about the "fully electric" fire truck. San Diego's NBC 7 reported on what it called
that city's first "all electric fire apparatus." When the electric fire engine debuted in Portland,
NBC's KGW 8 quoted a fire department spokesman lauding the "monumental" "zero emissions"
vehicle. When an electric fire truck came to Gilbert, Arizona, FOX 10 quoted the fire chief
saying that "There's no cancer coming out of the tail pipe and I say it that way because diesel
particulates are a contributor for cancers." Viewers could be forgiven for thinking that the
new fire trucks were all electric and zero emissions. They'd be wrong. All the fire
trucks also have a diesel engine and a tailpipe releases those "cancer-causing particulates."
The
Ravings of a Kindly Old Man with a Poor Memory. [Scroll down] Speaking of
pathetic, who among you believes anything the sad, servile mainstream media parrots? Do they
not lie as easily as they breathe? Are they not completely predictable as to how they will
deal with a given circumstance? Are they not foul creatures fully under the control of the
D.C. swamp? They are.
Sorry,
Climate Activists, Montana Climate Harms Are Not Occurring. An environmental activist
website called The Cool Down (TCD) just embarrassed itself by making provably false claims about
climate change in Montana and by showing it cannot read a basic calendar. On May 7,
2024, TCD published an article titled, "State lawmakers pass unprecedented anti-science law: 'Our
families are already suffering.'" The article begins, "Montana's legislature has passed the
nation's most aggressive anti-science law, prohibiting state agencies from considering the impacts
of excess heat-trapping pollution when reviewing permits for large projects like coal mines and
power plants." Apparently, TCD doesn't know how to read a calendar. The Montana
legislature passed the law in question in April 2023, more than a full year before the TCD
article, which is written as if the law had just recently been passed. [...] TCD's sloppy research
is not restricted just to calendar reading. The article embarrasses itself regarding climate
change, also. According to TCD, "This legislation comes at a pivotal time, as Montana's
climate has already changed significantly over the past century. The state has experienced
earlier snowmelt, more frequent heat waves, and a growing risk of wildfires." Let's examine
these three claims. [...]
Fearmongering
keeps the elites in power. [Scroll down] More recently, experts told us
that COVID-19 was so deadly, it could kill us all if we didn't do precisely as they said.
Turns out that what they instructed us to do was deadlier than COVID-19 itself. [...] There are
only two types of societies. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, freedom can reign. This explains our current
government's reaction to Jan. 6. (Sadly, "the government" now includes academia and the
mainstream media.)
Don't
fall for this trap when watching the news. While watching news coverage of the
protests on college campuses, one segment caught my attention. A TV Anchor reacting to a
Forbes report about some employers hiring fewer Ivy League school graduates. The main reason
had nothing to do with the protests but with Ivy League universities' recruiting being more about
specialists than well-rounded students. But this anchor used the report as an opportunity to
stir up a culture war. North vs. south. Elite private institutions vs. public
universities. All while saying, "See? This is why they don't want to hire you."
While criticizing a school's handling of a situation is fair and so is student behavior, good
journalists know better than to make blanket statements about a group or a place. Having
worked for years as a reporter, I know that within crowds are many stories and journalists should
share them and offer context and nuance.
Why
would the public ever trust media outlets [...] ? [Scroll down] So why
would it be a surprise that the people who support Obama and Biden would also support the
protesters wreaking anti-Jew havoc across the nation? [...] The media also pretends that Trump
politicized the Justice Department[,] when that is most certainly Obama and Biden. They
pretend that Democrat policies want to help the poor and minorities, when the goal of Democrats for
over sixty years has been to make more people dependent on the government, instead of giving them
more of an opportunity to move up the economic ladder due to the joys of capitalism. The
media and other Democrats acted surprised and shocked at how much damage keeping schools closed
caused children. Only an idiot would be surprised. They pretend that rich people like
Bill Gates, Obama, George Soros, Michael Bloomberg, John Kerry, and others care about their carbon
footprint as they fly in private jets, own multiple mansions, and buy yachts. They pretend
that rich people buying worthless pieces of paper called carbon credits reduces their massive
carbon footprint. Those pieces of paper do nothing.
Why
climate change ISN'T going to end the world. Young people are terrified that climate
change will destroy Earth by the time they grow up, but the world is not actually ending, argues
Cambridge professor Mike Hulme. Humanity is not teetering on a cliff's edge, he says, at risk
of imminent catastrophe if we don't reach net-zero carbon emissions by a certain date. And he
has made it his mission to call out the people who claim we are. In his most recent book,
Climate Change Isn't Everything, Hulme argued that belief in the urgent fight against climate
change has shot far past the territory of science and become an ideology. Hulme, a professor
of human geography at the University of Cambridge, dubs this ideology 'climatism,' and he argues
that it can distort the way society approaches the world's ills, placing too much focus on slowing
Earth from warming.
The Editor says...
The article immediately above is accompanied by an Associated Press photo showing brown clouds coming
from three vertical stacks. This is an attempt to depict a factory (probably a power plant)
emitting huge quantities of smoke into the air. Astute readers will notice that the vapor comes
out of the big pipes and quickly disappears in the ambient air. That is the behavior of water
vapor, not smoke. The photo has been doctored in an attempt to make a problem out of something
that is not a problem. That's propaganda.
The
imaginary "climate crisis" is a product of climate activists and click-bait media.
The UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ("IPCC") reports don't define what a "climate
crisis" is. The crisis that supposedly requires society to achieve zero carbon emissions or,
at least, "net zero." On the contrary, the IPCC's latest Assessment Report ("AR6") published
in 2021 points out that corporate media's opinion of climate change has moved away from a
neutral position by adopting and promoting terms like "climate crisis," "global heating" and
"climate emergency." Such a statement by the IPCC should leave no doubt that the concept of an
ongoing "climate crisis" is a joint product of climate activists and the click-hungry media,
lacking a solid scientific basis, Aivar Usk writes.
Truth
Has Become A Casualty In Modern Journalism. Journalism once provided truthful insight
into the news of the day. [...] Those days are long past. We should all be mourning the death
of truth, but alas, few recognize what has happened to truth as a tool to strengthen nations and
guard against ruinous corruption. Truth has become a casualty of evil people's schemes.
The murder of truth was intentionally committed by individuals and organizations who cannot
accomplish their goals through rational, logical, and reasonable public debate. The world is
in the grips of mass propaganda, deceit, and an otherworldly strong delusion.
L
A Times Editorial Claim that "The planet is experiencing a horrifying streak of record-breaking
heat" is Unsupported by NOAA's Climate Data. The opening L A Times editorial
paragraph claims that for California "the last few months have been more than 2 degrees hotter
than average". This claim is erroneous as demonstrated in the discussion below. NOAA's data
for the maximum temperatures experienced in California for the month of February 2024 as well
as all February months for years from 1895 to 2023 are shown below. [Charts] NOAA's data
shows the mean February maximum temperature over its base period interval of 1901 [to] 2000 is
55.6 degrees F compared to California's February 2024 maximum value of 56.0 degrees
F (0.4 degrees F above the mean) as indicated in NOAA's data table below versus the Times
distorted and false claim of "2 degrees hotter than average". [More charts] More
importantly, the February 2024 maximum temperature of 56 degrees F in California is only
the 62nd highest out of 130 total February recorded highest values with the 2024 temperature
clearly not representing "a horrifying streak of record-breaking heat" as falsely hyped by the
L A Times editorial.
Media
Hoax: No, Israel Did Not Dig 'Mass Grave' At Gaza's Nasser Hospital. Another
day, another Hamas hoax amplified by Democrats and the mainstream media. This time around,
the story is about a mass grave at Gaza's Nasser Hospital that was allegedly only recently
discovered, according to workers for the Hamas-run Gaza Civil Defense. CNN, of course, was
among the numerous media outlets to breathlessly report on the story, which strongly insinuated the
IDF dug the graves and, in the process, committed war crimes. Make sure to take note of the
framing: [Advertisement] ["]The United Nations has called for an 'independent,
effective and transparent investigation' into the discovery of mass graves at two Gaza hospitals
that were besieged and raided by Israeli troops this year. The UN High Commissioner for Human
Rights Volker Türk said in a statement he was 'horrified' by the scenes reported from both the
Nasser and Al Shifa medical complexes in the besieged enclave.["] [...] Hamas Caucus leader
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) pounced and seized, and demanded to know where the media coverage
was, apparently ignoring the fact that national news outlets had already picked up the ball and run
with it: [Tweet]
Divide
& Conquer: The Government's Propaganda of Fear & Fake News. [T]he political
scene in the United States has devolved over the years into a carefully calibrated exercise in how
to manipulate, polarize, propagandize and control a population. [...] As long as we are distracted,
entertained, occasionally outraged, always polarized but largely uninvolved and content to remain
in the viewer's seat, we'll never manage to present a unified front against tyranny (or government
corruption and ineptitude) in any form. Studies suggest that the more reality TV people
watch — and I would posit that it's all reality TV, entertainment news
included — the more difficult it becomes to distinguish between what is real and what is
carefully crafted farce. "We the people" are watching a lot of TV. On average, Americans
spend five hours a day watching television. By the time we reach age 65, we're watching more
than 50 hours of television a week, and that number increases as we get older. And
reality TV programming consistently captures the largest percentage of TV watchers every season by
an almost 2-1 ratio.
The
Collapse of the Mainstream Media Part 3: COVID-19. During a major crisis, the
mainstream media has a duty to ask hard questions and scrutinize official claims and thus fulfill
its responsibility to provide objective, accurate, and reliable reporting. During the COVID
pandemic, however, legacy media became the mouthpiece of officialdom whose ever-changing and
backpedaling claims were unquestionably parroted by their media assets. As a result, the
public's trust dropped, according to Gallup, who noted in October 2022 that "this is the first
time that the percentage of Americans with no trust at all in the media is higher than the
percentage with a great deal or a fair amount combined." As fears and hysteria over COVID grew
and grew, the public looked increasingly to the media for information and assurances regarding the
safety and effectiveness of the experimental mRNA vaccines that were rushed to market during
Operation Warp Speed. In response, legacy media dutifully echoed the assurances from the
authorities that the vaccines are "safe and effective." However, these claims were ultimately
proven false.
USA
Today Wants You to Believe Joe Biden 'Clamped' Down on the Illegal Immigration.
President Joe Biden has "clamped" down on illegal border crossings, according to USA Today —
the millions of immigrants still crossing the southern border must have not gotten the memo yet.
USA Today is taking heat after publishing an article on Friday claiming that Biden has done tremendous
work on securing the U.S.-Mexico border. [...] Since day one of Biden's term, he has halted deportations,
stopped border wall construction, Ended the Trump-era Remain In Mexico policy and Title 42, and
reinstated a catch-and-release program — all of which have encouraged illegal immigrants to
come to the United States. As of Saturday, Biden has yet to reverse any of those policies and put
his foot down on illegal immigration. So unless there is an invisible fence along the southern
border, the U.S. border is still wide open for aliens to cross.
Former
ESPN host reveals that her 2021 Biden interview was scripted. In a recent interview
with Fox News, former ESPN host Sage Steele revealed that her interview from March 2021 with
Joe Biden was scripted by network executives. "That was an interesting experience in its own
right because it was so structured," Steele revealed. She said her superiors asked her to
repeat "every word" that they wrote for her and warned her to "not deviate from the script" they'd
prepared. [...] Since Steele wasn't sitting with Biden in person, it is quite likely that he was
reading the answers from another script before him. To sum it up, the Steele interview was
more like a scripted short video than an interview.
Sage
Steele Says ESPN Bosses Made Her Follow 'Every Word' Of Carefully Planned Q&A With
Biden. Former ESPN anchor Sage Steele opened up about an interview she conducted with
President Joe Biden while working for the network in 2021, telling Fox News that her bosses made
sure she would follow "every word" of the script during her exchange with the
commander-in-chief. Steele, who left ESPN after criticizing its COVID vaccine mandate, said
her headline-making interview with Biden in March 2021 was carefully planned out by the
network's executives, and she was told "not to deviate" from the written questions. The
interview focused on sports returning to normalcy following months of COVID lockdowns, along with
athletes and fans being hesitant to get the COVID shot, Fox News reported. Biden repeatedly
admonished Americans to "follow the science" and get vaccinated during the interview. "That was
an interesting experience in its own right because it was so structured," Steele said. "And I
was told, 'You will say every word that we write out, you will not deviate from the script and go.'"
Dems,
Media Push New Study Linking Climate Change to Inflation, But Economists Aren't Buying
It. Liberals are touting a new study linking climate change and inflation, but
economists say that the real causes are more likely to be massive government interventions in the
economy purporting to save the climate. The study, authored by four European researchers and
published in the scientific journal Communications: Earth and Environment on March 21,
argues that "temperature increases cause nonlinear, persistent increases in food and headline
inflation," according to its text. While corporate media outlets, climate activists and
Democrats have boosted the study's findings, the forces related to climate change that are likely to
drive persistent inflation are massive government taxation, spending and regulation pushed by policymakers
to fight climate change, according to economists who spoke with the Daily Caller News Foundation.
Jon
Stewart Falsely Claims Loans to Trump Meant Fewer Loans To Other People. Claim:
Comedian Jon Stewart said this week that the loans at the center of the civil real-estate case
against Donald Trump meant there were fewer loans available to other borrowers. "Money isn't
infinite. A loan that goes to the liar doesn't go to someone who's giving a more honest
evaluation. So the system becomes incentivized for corruption," Stewart said.
Verdict: False. The amount of money available for loans from banks is not diminished
when banks make loans to other customers, except in the rare case of a distressed bank that is
capital-constrained. A loan to one customer does not subtract from a fixed pool of loans
available to the other customers of the bank. Stewart's comments reflect a misconception of a
bank as a kind of money vault where taking some money out to lend leaves less money out for other loans.
The Editor says...
Joe Biden seems to think the money supply is infinite. Just look at the federal deficit.
Does the national debt keep him from spending more money? Both Mr. Biden and Mr. Stewart
would benefit from economics classes.
Gaza:
Truths Behind All the Lies. [Lie #1] "Occupied Gaza." Prior to October 7,
there were roughly two million Arab citizens of Israel but no Jewish citizens in Gaza. Gazans
in 2006 voted in Hamas to rule them. It summarily executed its Palestinian Authority rivals.
Hamas cancelled all future scheduled elections. It established a dictatorship and diverted
hundreds of billions of dollars in international aid to build a vast underground labyrinth of
military installations. [Lie #2] "Collateral Damage." Hamas began
the war by deliberately targeting civilians. It massacred them on October 7 when it
invaded Israel during a time of peace and holidays. It sent more than 7,000 rockets into
Israeli cities for the sole purpose of killing noncombatants. It has no vocabulary for the
collateral damage of Israeli civilians, since it believes any Jewish death under any circumstances
is cause for celebration. Hamas places its terrorist centers beneath and inside hospitals,
schools, and mosques. Why? Israel is assumed to have more reservations about
collaterally hitting Gaza civilians than Hamas does exposing them as human shields.
Jon
Stewart found to have overvalued his NYC home by 829% after labeling Trump's civil case 'not
victimless'. Jon Stewart is facing online backlash after the comedian opined on air
this week that Donald Trump's civil real estate case for overvaluing his properties was "not
victimless" — when it turns out the price of a previous home sale finds Stewart doing
the exact same thing, The [New York] Post has learned. On Monday night, Stewart, 61, unpacked
Trump's $454 million appeal bond, calling out experts framing the former president's New York
civil case as not causing direct harm to any individual. "The Daily Show" host rolled a clip of
CNN's Laura Coates interviewing "Shark Tank" star Kevin O'Leary, who commented that the ruling
didn't "go over well" with the real estate industry that was now fretting over the possibility of
becoming the next target.
BBC
Meteorologist Falsely Claims South Sudan is Experiencing "Extreme Heat" for March.
South Sudan is experiencing "extreme heatwaves" and is shutting schools and cutting power, reports
BBC meteorologist Matt Taylor. "It is exceptionally early for South Sudan to experience such
heat — temperatures often exceed 43°C but only in the summer months, according to
the World Bank's Climate Change portal," he states. Hot days in the capital Juba —
five degrees north of the equator — are for some a big 'climate change' story, but it is
difficult to read into the World Bank data the interpretation that Taylor wants to publicise.
In fact it is impossible, since the data clearly show that average South Sudan temperatures peak in
March and then fall away through the wet monsoon 'summer' months.
Tony
Bobulinski's Lawyer Threatens Lawsuit Against Fox News' Jessica Tarlov for Dishonest Accusation.
Tony Bobulinski's testimony before Congress is upsetting all the right people. As a former associate
of Hunter Biden, he has been spilling the tea about the Biden family's business dealings, which isn't sitting
well with folks on the left. They responded to his involvement with House Republicans' impeachment
inquiry into President Joe Biden by doing their level best to smear and discredit the witness.
However, Bobulinski has been fighting back. Jessica Tarlov, a left-leaning co-host on Fox News'
"The Five," stepped in it on Wednesday when she claimed, without evidence, that Bobulinski was being
funded by Super PAC aligned with former President Donald Trump during a recent broadcast.
Liberal
FOX News Host Jessica Tarlov Forced to Issue On-Air Correction About Tony Bobulinski.
Jessica Tarlov, one of the rotating liberal hosts of The Five on FOX News, was forced to issue an
on-air correction about former Hunter Biden associate Tony Bobulinski on Thursday. On
Wednesday, Tarlov made some comments about who is paying Bobulinki's legal fees. His lawyer
was quick to react and apparently threatened a lawsuit.
Larry
Summers: Inflation [is] Much Worse Than [the] Government Says. Lawrence Summers, Treasury
Secretary under Clinton and economic advisor to Obama, is likely getting himself into trouble once
again with the Left. While president of Harvard, he blurted out the obvious fact that men and
women may be different, leading to a vote of no confidence by the faculty of Harvard, and since
Biden's election he has been critical of the president's economic policies, warning that they were
harming the economy. Well, he's done it again, this time in an economic paper that provides
the explanation for what the Left calls the "vibesession" — the persistent belief by Americans that
the economy is much worse than the official statistics indicate. [Tweet]
Trump
talks 'bloodbath' in auto industry if cheap Chinese EVs flood the market — Dems pretend
he called for violence. The media and other Democrats know that Joe Biden and
his policies are unpopular, so for the last eight years, they've sought to destroy Donald Trump, no
matter how much they have to intentionally lie and mislead the public, and this latest iteration is
beyond absurd. While speaking at a recent campaign rally, Trump said there would be a
"bloodbath" in the auto industry if China flooded the American market with cheap electric vehicles
flowing through Mexico — but instead of showing the full quote, much of the media, along
with Biden campaign workers and Democrats like Pelosi, decided that with polls as bad as they are,
they should intentionally mislead the public that Trump had called for violence if he doesn't win
in November.
Regime
Media: ABC World News Tonight Advances The Bloodbath Hoax. Despite clear,
documented context to the contrary, ABC continues to push the discredited piece of Biden campaign
propaganda known as the Bloodbath Hoax, and ties it to the Capitol Riot. Additionally, ABC
promoted a 2024 version of an immigration narrative that was trotted out both in 2015 and 2019.
Watch as ABC's Chief Biden Apple Polisher Mary Bruce broadcasts campaign disinformation from
behind the anchor desk, framing correspondent Maryalice Parks' video package:
[Video clip] As I said during my recap of the Sunday shows, to accept the idea that
people who are the elite in the industry of communicating with words are suddenly unable to
comprehend plain English requires multiple significant suspensions of disbelief. That's not
to say that some of these elites are not intellectually deficient. But not to
this extent. Which leaves willful deception as the only likely reason why reporters,
correspondents and anchors would, in near unanimity continue to promote Trump's assessment of
damage to the American automotive industry under a second Biden term as both a violent threat and a
January 6th-adjacent attack against democracy.
President
Trump Warns of a Looming Bloodbath in the Auto Industry Related to Chinese EV Plants in Mexico - Media
Go Bananas. Having previously written about the issue of three major Chinese EV
makers putting massive investment into production facilities, the remarks by President Trump in
Ohio warning of a "bloodbath" in the auto industry are exactly accurate. According to media,
last December the three Chinese auto manufacturers, MG, BYD, and Chery, announced they were going
to spend billions building new EV manufacturing plants in Mexico. Each Chinese auto
manufacturer was going to spend between $1.5 to $2.0 billion. The Chinese don't make
that much of an investment in something unless they are sure the U.S. government is going to force
the EV market to exist. These manufacturing plants would crush the U.S[.] EV market.
Drawing attention to the issue, President Trump said he can stop the pending crisis. However,
if he did not win the election the American auto industry would end up with a "bloodbath" of closed
plants, lost jobs and diminished labor union workforce. Trump is not wrong. [Video clip]
Media
Bloodbath: Elon Musk Is Now More Trustworthy Than Every Major News Outlet.
Shortly after Donald Trump made remarks at a rally in Ohio, Joe Scarborough posted on X: "Donald
Trump's America. And he is proud of it. Promised another 'bloodbath' if he loses
again." The picture was from the Jan. 6 riot. Soon after, however, Scarborough
deleted the post. We can't say for certain why, except that he hit the delete button shortly
after Elon Musk responded to "Morning Joe" with this comment: [Tweet] At least Scarborough
had the good sense to take back his inflammatory and wildly out-of-context portrayal of what Trump
had said. The same can't be said for almost every other major news outlet, which ran
blood-curdling headlines about Trump's supposed call to violence if he loses.
This
could be the devastating proof that Hamas is faking its death figures. One of the
marks of anti-Semitism, George Orwell observed in 1945, is "an ability to believe stories that
could not possibly be true". Which brings us smartly to Hamas and how the broadcast media, aid
organisations, international bodies and world leaders take its disinformation as gospel. Last
week it became clear that this gullibility may have led to a crime against reality. A new
analysis of the group's casualty statistics indicates that the rag-tag terror army may have pulled
off one of the biggest propaganda coups of modern times. The figures, repeated by everyone
from the White House to the BBC, are freighted with familiarity: 30,000 dead in Gaza, 70 percent
of whom are women and children. Yet it now seems overwhelmingly likely that these statistics
are fabricated. Professor Abraham Wyner, a data scientist at the University of Pennsylvania,
has conducted a thorough analysis. He found that Hamas's official civilian death toll was
statistically impossible.
Reporter
Leaves Out Key Facts in Hit Piece on Libs of TikTok. Vice News published a story last
fall asserting that Libs of TikTok, the popular social media account run by Chaya Raichik, was
responsible for a rise in school bomb threats. The reporter, Tess Owen, wrote that "bomb
threats targeting schools or school districts following Libs of TikTok posts appears to be a
particularly ominous escalation." She then cited a "disturbing pattern" from 11 school
districts. Newly obtained emails, released Thursday by Raichik, suggest that Owen wasn't
completely truthful in her reporting. In a post on X, Libs of TikTok claimed Vice News and Owen
"knowingly withheld critical information about me because it didn't fit their narrative." [Tweet]
Entire
staff at Deadspin fired months after they smeared 9-year-old Chiefs fan as a racist.
Just five months after Deadspin tried to smear a 9-year-old Kansas City Chiefs fan as a racist, all
of the sports media outlet's employees have been fired as a part of a buyout. Employees
received an email announcing the sale, and some were told at a meeting before their access to the
company's digital resources was cut off. "Recently we were approached by the European firm
Lineup Publishing expressing interest in purchasing Deadspin to add to their growing media
holdings," the email read in part. [...] Deadspin was excoriated by many after it tried to
misrepresent the costume worn by a young fan of the Kansas City Chiefs as "blackface." Critics
immediately slammed the outlet by pointing out that they had used a misleading photo only showing
one side of the child's face and not the other, which was colored in red. In February, the
family of the boy named Holden Armenta filed a defamation lawsuit against Deadspin. The
Armenta family said they have received "a barrage of hate, including death threats" as a result of
the article.
Trump's
Promise — Retribution or Revenge? [Scroll down] The New York
Times, with a long history of publishing falsehoods about Donald Trump, has already labeled Trump's
potential second term, "The Retribution Presidency." There is a smell of panic rising from
midtown Manhattan and from the Beltway. Is this revenge or retribution? Is there a
distinction? [...] Here is a summary of the two terms. Words do matter.
• Retribution is a form of punishment imposed by law and legally authorized.
• Revenge, in contrast, is a form of personal punishment, one not sanctioned by law.
• The ultimate goal of Retribution is to punish the wrongdoer or offender and
ensure that justice is served to the victim and public as a whole.
• Revenge, however, is a form of payback, to ensure that personal justice is
served. Thus, the goal of Revenge is vengeance or getting even.
• Retribution is only carried out for crimes and wrongs recognized in the
law. It is not personal and not fueled by a desire to persistently seek the suffering of the
wrongdoer. Instead, it imposes a punishment that is proportionate to the gravity of the crime
or wrong. Furthermore, it is governed by procedural rules and codes of conduct.
• In contrast, Revenge can be carried out for various wrongs, injuries,
suffering and any other action considered harmful or hurtful. There is no limit to the type of
punishment imposed and the severity of such punishment. As mentioned before, Revenge is personal
and driven by a strong emotional desire to see the suffering of the person who committed the wrong or injury.
Which of these two words describe what the deep state ruling class has done to Trump versus what
he will hopefully do if reelected president?
Our
Constitutional Republic Has Gone Crazy But There's Nowhere To Hide. [Laken] Riley, a
22-year-old nursing student, was murdered in Georgia for jogging alone (as the Associated
Press insinuated) or by an "Athens Man" (according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution) —
anything other than the realities of her alleged murderer Jose Antonio "Athens Man" Ibarra being an
illegal migrant from Venezuela, arrested and released once already since his arrival in September 2022.
The
MSM Is Corrupt Beyond Repair. It's not news that the MSM is obsessed with pushing a
narrative and that the narrative is grotesquely slanted to the left. That's why Americans'
trust in media is at record lows. The decline has been rapid, and there is zero chance it
will reverse any time soon. Pretty much the only people who express any trust in the sewage
that the MSM pumps out are people who love to swim in it: Leftists. But that doesn't
mean that the propaganda mills that our media have become don't accomplish the task to which they
have been set. As much as people know that what they have been sold is [worthless], it's
still the only news that most people ever get. By sheer force of repetition, people wind up
believing much of what they are told, even though they know it is slanted. Millions of
Americans believe in the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax and a whole host of other lies. As long
as the media selectively edits clips, loudly and often repeats lies, and pushes for the censorship
and "fact-checking" of alternative media, lies often become conventional wisdom.
NYT
Editor Blames Swing Voters Who 'Don't Know Or Remember' Trump. New York Times
headline, Feb. 20: "A Big Opportunity to Define Trump as Unacceptable." The short item by
Times Deputy Opinion Editor Patrick Healy follows up on an unintentionally hilarious focus group
session the paper conducted last week, wherein 11 out of 13 voters who supported Joe Biden in 2020
say they now support Trump. Among the switching voters was a man who said he would support
Trump even though he believed him to have committed "sexual abuse" and two others who said criminal
convictions in any of the charges against him would not change their minds.
Gaslighting:
To Help Reelect Biden, Media Claim Trump Is Going Senile, Too. It's quite timely that
after writing on article yesterday on media bias, the following headline popped up on my MSN
homepage: "Donald Trump's cognitive decline worse than Joe Biden's due to 2 signs, professor
says." Notice what's assumed (and what's assumed is learned best) in the above
headline: We're to take it as a given that Trump is declining cognitively. The only
question is the severity. Of course, the message here essentially IS, "Yeah, our guy Biden is
senile. But the other guy is even more senile! Vote Incumbent Dementia!" And that,
citizens, is what you call gaslighting. Joe Biden's cognitive decline is obvious and severe.
USA
Today can't stop promoting the global warming fallacies. [Scroll down]
Every one of these articles starts with the intentional lie that people who disagree with the
radical green agenda are climate change deniers. I have never seen anyone deny that the
climate changes. We tell the truth that the climate has always changed cyclically and
naturally. What we deny is that humans and our use of natural resources cause global warming
and that warming causes the ice to melt in the Arctic and that melting will cause a massive rise in
sea levels. They also tell us that the warming causes more severe and deadly storms. We
also don't believe that politicians, bureaucrats, scientists, or anyone else can establish policies
that control temperatures, sea levels, and storm activity forever. We also don't believe the
computer model predictions because previous dire predictions have not come true.
Met
Office Says it Cannot Back Up its Senior Meteorologist's Claim on BBC Radio That Storms in the U.K.
are "More Intense" Due to Climate Change. The Met Office has been unable to back up a
claim that storms in the U.K. are "more intense" due to the effects of climate change. The
claim was made by senior Met Office meteorologist Claire Nasir on January 22nd on BBC 5 Live
Breakfast in the aftermath of Storm Isha, and led to a freedom of information request for an
explanation by investigative journalist Paul Homewood. The Met Office has replied that it is
unable to answer the request due to the fact that the information "is not held".
Respect
for Authorities 'Died Suddenly'. Given the U.S. government's love affair with
censorship and propaganda, I sometimes imagine future historians piecing through the shards of
Western civilization in order to understand the reasons for its collapse. According to the
prevailing "narrative," everything right now is tremendously great! We are told that the
economy is strong, that crime is under control, that our borders are secure, that paying twenty
bucks for a fast-food hamburger is cheap, and that endless war produces endless peace.
According to the news media, Americans have never had it so good!
Is the
Electoral Fix Already In? The fix is in. To "protect democracy," democracy is
already being canceled. We just haven't admitted the implications of this to ourselves
yet. On Sunday, January 14th, NBC News ran an eye-catching story: "Fears grow that Trump
will use the military in 'dictatorial ways' if he returns to the White House." It described "a
loose-knit network of public interest groups and lawmakers" that is "quietly" making plans to "foil
any efforts to expand presidential power" on the part of Donald Trump. The piece quoted an
array of former high-ranking officials, all insisting Trump will misuse the Department of Defense
to execute civilian political aims. Since Joe Biden's team "leaked" a strategy memo in late
December listing "Trump is an existential threat to democracy" as Campaign 2024's central talking
point, surrogates have worked overtime to insert existential or democracy in quotes.
Reporter
Gets Torn to Shreds for Claiming 'Learn to Code' Was Never a Thing. It's one of those
cases where you know they're wrong. You could probably ignore them, but it's the liberal
media, so you attack at them like a pod of orcas. Better yet, like orcas, play with your prey
before mutilating and devouring it. That's what's happening with some in the establishment
media trying to say that "learn to code" was never a thing and that Joe Biden never said it.
Like their allies in the Democratic Party and now the Department of Justice, these people just
lie. It's a phrase created by this insular circle aimed at working Americans whose jobs were
being unnecessarily targeted by Democrats, specifically Barack Obama, who declared war on coal
during his presidency. The PR pitch for destroying the livelihoods of these Americans was
that job retraining would be part of their transitioning process into what Democrats feel should be
our energy future. Even labor unions know those two words are snake oil, being sold to them
when NAFTA was passed to ease the growing concerns about that trade agreement.
You're
Going To Get Dirty. The trouble I find with conservatives in general and America
First people is their demand that everything be pure and sparkling with virtue. This tendency
is what allowed the feds and Democrats to manipulate the January 6th protest into a riot and
subsequently into an insurrection. The immediate response to the horrible events described on
that date by a well-known corrupt media should have been: No, it isn't a riot, it isn't an
insurrection, it's a peaceful demonstration. I noticed on the very day of the event,
listening on the radio (probably a federal charge under this DOJ) that the reporting went from:
"It's amazing how many people came out to support Donald Trump and protest the obviously crooked
2020 election" to "It's shameful for these protesters to violate the sanctified halls of congress"
in fifteen minutes, by the same broadcaster. That's a lack of situational awareness and a
desire for liberal acceptance.
Another
Bogus Border Story Goes Viral and Most Outlets Aren't in a Hurry to Issue Corrections.
The left wing response to the border crisis can be summarized as a series of misleading viral stories
designed to vilify anyone who believes border control is a basic operation for a nation. It
started under Trump with the panic over "kids in cages." [...] Then there was the AOC-led campaign
to re-label Border Patrol facilities "concentration camps" [...] And lets not forget the viral claim
that Border Patrol agents on horeseback were whipping Hatian migrants. This was such a big deal
that President Biden promised the people who did it would pay. [Tweet] Once again, it
never happened. Even the photographer said so. Sec. Mayorkas knew it hadn't happened
even before he went to the White House and claimed it had. [...] Given how often the media has jumped
on these stories only to have them fall out from under them, you'd think they might learn to be more
careful. But it seems that's never the case. Two days ago another story went viral.
2023
"Earth's Hottest Year on Record" Claims Fail. The year-end 2023 global average
temperature anomaly measurement data outcomes have climate alarmist media falsely claiming these
results established that "2023 Was the Hottest Year on Record" since records began in the
mid-1800s. These "hottest year on record" claims are based on misrepresenting the
year 2023 obscure "global average temperature anomaly" outcome that is not applicable to any
specific location or region on earth. [...] NOAA's global regional temperature anomaly data
establishes that the assertion of year 2023 being the "highest ever measured average
temperature anomaly" claim did not occur across the globally dominant regional land areas that
include Asia, Europe, U.S., Oceania, Hawaiian Region, Arctic and the Antarctic.
ESPN
[has been] forced to return 37 ill-gotten Emmy awards. ESPN has been ordered to
return 37 Emmy awards the sports network received under false pretenses. For 13 years,
ESPN committed "fraud" by submitting fake names to the credit list for the Emmys, according to the
National Academy of Television Arts and Sciences (NATAS). "Since at least 2010 ... ESPN took
the awards won by some of those imaginary individuals, had them re-engraved, and gave them to
on-air personalities," The Athletic reported on Thursday. ESPN gave some of the re-engraved
trophies to front-facing figures on "College GameDay," such as Lee Corso, Kirk Herbstreit, Chris
Fowler, Desmond Howard, and Sam Ponder. The report claims the on-air personalities were not
aware of the scheme as ESPN higher ups convinced them they had won the awards containing their
names. Eventually, NATAS ordered ESPN to return the ill-gotten Emmys, each of which was
intended for a behind-the-scenes employee who does not exist.
The Editor says...
Obviously, NATAS is Satan spelled backwards. Just a coincidence, right?
More Lunatic
Legal Coverage. Reporters keep plunging to bizarre new lows in coverage of Donald
Trump. The new jam: his lawyer argued presidents can assassinate rivals. Except he
didn't, at all. [Paywall]
Taking
a look at my hometown data I discover the very opposite of the 'global warming' narrative is
true. The following are actual pieces of scientific data related to Springfield,
Illinois, where I live: The warmest day recorded in January is 73 degrees Fahrenheit on
January 23, 1909, so every day in January, for the last 115 years, has been colder; the
warmest day ever in February is February 24, 1930, when temperatures hit 78 degrees; the
warmest day in March was March 21, 1907, when the temperature hit 91 degrees. The
average high temperature in Springfield today is around 36 degrees, and this weekend we are
supposed to have highs around 30 degrees below normal, with wind chills around 20 below
zero. So, after 160 years of exponential growth of all the things the green pushers say
cause warming, we are thirty degrees below normal. Temperatures have always fluctuated
cyclically and naturally. Humans have no control over them, and there is no correlation
between CO2 content, crude oil use, number of vehicles, and temperatures. Yet, here is an
article from two days ago, full of worthless information and repeated talking points, all to push
the radical green agenda to scare people into capitulation: ["]Earth shattered global
heat record in '23 and it's flirting with warming limit, European agency says["]
Five
Things Every Patriot Should Be Furious About. [#2] The news is lying: How can
you tell if your favorite news dude/dudette is trustworthy? Here is a hint: see how many
of these Blue Anon conspiracy theories they pushed:
• Trump/Russia collusion
• Pee-pee gate
• Hunter's laptop is Russian flapdoodle
• Ivermectin is only for horses
• Masks, lockdowns, and the vaccine will save lives
• COVID-19 came from a bat salad
• Unarmed grannies tried to topple the government
• Biden got 81 million votes and didn't even campaign.
The lying liarheads in the news are your enemy.
Separating
fact from fiction on 'climate change'. Why is it easier to find lies in the media
about "climate change" than truthful information? Why is honest reporting on the environment
an outlier instead of a rule? Media parrots have said for decades that humans, and our use of
natural resources are killing the planet, and that oceans, species, and forests are dying.
They report on future predictions, but rarely on scientific facts — so I thought I would
fill the vacuum. We have been told that we are responsible for irredeemable destruction in
the Great Barrier Reef, but that is not true. The reef is making a "comeback," yet we don't
see that story because it doesn't push the radical green agenda; [...] It was thinning cyclically
and naturally, and it has come back cyclically and naturally. Humans didn't cause the
thinning, and government policies didn't cause the comeback — or we would see the green
pushers claiming victory.
Let's
Stop Using the Words: 'Trump Tried to Overturn the 2020 Election'. After almost three
years — and as Democrats in Colorado and Maine ban Donald Trump from the Centennial
State's ballot — it is beyond time for the media to stop "reporting" that "Trump tried
to overturn a presidential election" and to quit referring matter-of-factly: to "the election that
Trump lost"; to "Trump's defeat" and his "baseless" "false claims"; and to "Trump is challenging
the results" of "Biden's victory (in, say, Georgia)" and to "swing the election in his favor."
It is equally time for news organizations to stop "reporting" that the four (who's counting?)
indictments are nothing more than valid or understandable (if ill-timed) reactions to punish Trump
for his ("criminal") attempts to "disenfranchise voters" and thus "subvert democracy." This
is not a neutral, objective, and non-partisan view of of the facts of the 2020 election. Far
from it. No. It is the (self-serving) DNC version. It is akin to asking "When did
you stop beating your wife?" Phrases like "baseless fraud claims," "sham election
investigations," and "false claims of election fraud" come straight from the Democrat party.
Waking
Up to the Age of Deception. Each day in this "Age of Deception" constantly raises
challenges in finding reliable information. The 2024 election has already demonstrated that
disinformation will be used regarding the economy, climate, immigration, voting, and woke
thinking. The legal attacks against former president Donald Trump are a example of vicious
deception. Another example where truth has become a minor consideration is the Israel/Gaza
conflict. We are shown scores of contradictory reports, each of them appealing to our most
primitive emotions. Fake news identification has expanded due to the growth of digital
communication and social media. In the field of journalism, information is power. It
doesn't matter whether it is true or not, only that it is persuasive. Individuals now have a
wider range of news sources, which disseminate biased perspectives. The echo chamber effect
gives self-proclaimed attention seekers the power to spread their deceptive message.
Democrats
and Media Deceptively Change Trump's Word 'Retribution' to 'Revenge'. The latest
misinformation that the Democrat "news"-media colluders (hereafter the DNC) to smear Donald Trump
before the 2024 election is that Trump called for "revenge" for his political opponents if wins
re-election in 2024. Brett Samuels in The Hill says that "Trump signals he's out for revenge in
his second term." The Daily Mail and the left-wing The Guardian, both in the U.K., makes the
same accusation. Politico states that in a second term, Trump will be seeking revenge.
Felon Michael Cohen, now a regular useful expert guest on CNN, stated to Jake Tapper that he could
be the target of Trump's revenge, to which Jake replied, "That has occurred to me too" (thereby
admitting that his view of Trump is tainted by self-interest). The Washington Post, which used
to be a newspaper, reports that Trump and his allies plot revenge" in his second term. The
Huffington Post announces that Trump "vows vengeance" against "vermin" in his second term.
CNN states ominously that in his second term Trump will use his justice department "for revenge."
Tesla
'Recall' Is Nothing of the Sort. If you have any doubt that the MSM and online
influencers have it out for Elon Musk, all you need to do is search Google for the fake news about
a Tesla "recall." The news is everwhere. Tesla must "recall" almost every vehicle they
ever sold, proving that the product is defective and that Elon Musk is a total fraud or
something. It is, of course, total bunkum. That is not even remotely true. [...] I
admire that Musk built a new car company out of almost nothing and made it successful. That's
a tough task, and the argument that he did it on the backs of American taxpayers is a bit rich,
given how big the subsidies the feds have tossed at other American carmakers. But as for the
cars or the company? Other than wishing I had invested in the company years ago since I could
have easily retired by now if I had done so, I have no special affinity. With that said I
have to laugh at the claim that the feds are issuing a recall on all Teslas, as if owners were
being forced to bring their cars into the shop to get some work done.
Reporter
Kiera Butler is a Disinfo Dupe. Kiera Butler is a journalist on a crusade to "save
the world" from Donald Trump, "Russian disinformation," and those dangerous "anti-vaxxers."
However the real danger is within the mix of truth, lies, and spin that Butler combines in her
reporting at Mother Jones. Rather than having certain fields in which she seems to excel,
Butler's reporting tends to take a confrontational tone in claiming the latest mainstream "current
thing" topic is unquestionably correct and anyone questioning it is stupid or has bad intentions.
This type of slippery journalism that seems more concerned with taking sides than the truth is dishonest
but also brings us face-to-face with the loss of values such as free speech and civil liberties.
Telemundo
Omitted That Killer of Texas Cheerleader Is Here Illegally. One of the most egregious
form of business-interest bias in Spanish-language media occurs when it is deemed necessary to
conceal the immigration status of the suspect of a heinous crime. Such is the case with
Telemundo blatantly omitting that the recently-arrested killer of a 16-year-old Texas cheerleader
was in the country illegally. [Video clip]
Reporter claimed
Gaza couldn't use cell phones, spokesman proves her wrong. Major Doron Spielman from
the IDF spoke to Sky News about the resumption of fighting against Hamas in Gaza. [...] On the
question of Gazan residents being notified of IDF targets while not having power to power up their
mobile phones or Wi-Fi, Major Spielman responded, "I think that you and all of your viewers saw our
hostages being paraded through the streets as they were released to Israel over those seven
nights. Hundreds of Gazans were holding their phones and videoing them, so clearly, there's
enough power to power their phones when they're parading our hostages throughout Gaza. Now
that same power to their phones will be used to get the maps downloaded and look at the flyers
[giving them information on IDF attacks]."
Sports
Illustrated Published AI-Generated Articles Under Fake Names. Sports Illustrated was
once the benchmark for sports content but today the site has been accused of publishing
AI-generated content under the names of authors who are also AI-generated. Case in point,
Drew Ortiz who had a photo and an author biography on the site. ["]Outside of Sports
Illustrated, Drew Ortiz doesn't seem to exist. He has no social media presence and no
publishing history. And even more strangely, his profile photo on Sports Illustrated is for
sale on a website that sells AI-generated headshots, [...]["]
More
Media Malpractice. One of the major reasons why Americans are divided and hostile
toward each other is that we live in alternate universes. Not literally, but
functionally. We have all seen the polls that show Americans have been losing trust in the
MSM for a long time. Only 36% of Americans say they have a "great deal" or "fair amount" of
trust in the MSM, but this fact hides an important distinction: the majority of Democrats trust the
MSM, while Republicans have given up on getting anything remotely close to the truth from the MSM.
Republicans have earned their distrust not just because they are often lied about and can't help but
notice this fact, but also because they are literally unable to avoid getting the majority of
their news from MSM news sources, while consciously exposing themselves to alternative points of
view. Democrats rarely do. They automatically distrust alternative or conservative
media and tend to trust without question what they hear from the MSM. This is not because they are
universally stupid or uninterested in the news, but because they are inclined to trust the
"misinformation" narrative.
Do
we even know what we're dealing with? If you lived in a cave and the only thing you
could view was cable news, what would you see? That's easy: Donald Trump, Climate
Change, and so-called Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion issues. There is no fourth
place. These three subjects reliably suck up virtually all the oxygen. They also serve
to misdirect, miseducate, and mis-prioritize our country against the genuine perils aligning
against us. This isn't surprising. With few exceptions, America's journalists graduated
from many of those same radical hotbeds of anti-Americanism that are now, for the first time,
showing their true colors. Students, graduates, and faculty will need a generation or more to
grasp the truth if they ever do.
Sidney
Powell Didn't Flip on Trump or MAGA. It is alarming (although not surprising) to see
the misinformation in headlines, new articles, and on social media about Sidney Powell's plea in
Georgia last week. Even good Republicans and MAGA supporters seem confused and misinformed
about the facts of her plea, many believing she has disavowed her position on the 2020 election and
betrayed her supporters or that she has "flipped" on Trump. First, let's be very clear that
Sidney did not plead guilty to a conspiracy with Donald Trump to unlawfully overturn the 2020
election. [...] Claims she flipped on Donald Trump are outlandish and without basis. We say
that someone has flipped when a defendant agrees to testify/incriminate someone else in exchange
for a lighter charge or suggested lighter sentence. But Sidney's plea agreement is for
conduct unrelated to Donald Trump and only tenuously related to even Sidney herself. Simply
put: Sidney agreed to take the rap for the disputed access to Fulton County machines.
Second, keep in mind that Sidney's plea is different from the other pleas. The media has been
reporting on each plea as if each co-defendant is caving and pleading to the same serious
charges — admitting the fight for election integrity was a fraud and there was a
conspiracy with Trump. This is not true.
Media
Erase Killing Of Jewish Man Like They Erased The Violence Of 2020's Race Riots.
Corporate media banded together on Tuesday to cover for Hamas apologists after a 69-year-old Jewish
man was killed due to injuries he sustained at an anti-Israel demonstration in California over the
weekend. Videos show emergency responders in Thousand Oaks, California loading Paul Kessler,
who reportedly carried an Israeli flag at the protest, into an ambulance while the anti-Israel
crowd chanted and waved Palestinian flags near a pool of his blood on the ground. At least
one police officer was seen trying to discourage a man yelling in a megaphone from disturbing the
scene. [Tweet] The pro-Palestine demonstrator who allegedly interacted with Kessler has not
been publicly identified or arrested but Sheriff James Fryhoff did confirm during a press
conference on Tuesday that the 50-year-old's house is being searched. "These witnesses provided
conflicting statements about what the altercation and who the aggressor was," Sheriff James Fryhoff
said. The Ventura County Sheriff's Office, which might investigate the incident as a hate
crime, said witness accounts suggest that "Kessler fell backwards and struck his head on the ground."
World
'Recoiling in Horror' at IDF; Nets Smear Israel Not Being in 'Mood to Compromise'.
Between Sunday and Monday, the major broadcast networks of ABC, CBS, and NBC used their flagship
morning and evening newscasts to start a new week of anti-Israel smears and siding with Hamas
terrorists as Tuesday marks one month since the latter's animalistic barbarism murdered at least
1,400 innocents and resulted in over 200 hostages. This time, the networks argued the world's
"recoiling in horror" at Israel's 'search and destroy mission" that's "shattering...lives" in Gaza
and Israel remaining still "not" being in a "mood to compromise" with Hamas.
The
Corrupt Media Tried to Implicate Me in a Mass Shooting Because a Psychopath 'Liked My
Tweets'. According to reporters, producers and editors at major news organizations,
my Twitter, which is full of my disapproval of leftists and their policies — somehow
contributed to the deaths and injuries of innocent people in Lewiston, Maine. Those same
people would have you then believe that had other conservative commentators and I only not run our
mouths, none of his actions would have occurred. [...] Caving or even becoming complacent to the
constant attacks and spin from the left will never get us out of the situation we're in. In
the middle of record inflation that includes fuel and grocery prices that are in our faces every
single day — it's important to know that we are in an information war with the very
people who have traditionally been the providers of information. And while they're the first
to scream "disinformation" at stories they disagree with — they're also the ones who are
first to serve us disinformation.
We
Must Learn to Ignore the Colin Kaepernick Media Narrative. The news cycle has been
full of stories about Colin Kaepernick and the latest speculation of his signing with another
football team. These stories are similar to those that have circulated for the past seven
years. To recap, Colin Kaepernick played quarterback for the San Francisco 49ers until he was
benched and released in 2016. He's also known for his protests against the police by kneeling
during the National Anthem. Nothing else has happened for seven years. Nothing.
The story has not really been about Colin Kaepernick at all. The story has been (and is)
about how the establishment media creates news out of nothing, and keeps the narrative on life
support long after the patient has died. Since 2016, while nothing was happening, we have
been bombarded with "news" stories anticipating yet another milestone in Kaepernick's career.
From reading seven years of headlines, a reader would conclude that Kaepernick has actually played
football for various teams during that time. An October story announced "NFL world reacts as
Colin Kaepernick makes major move." But, if one reads the actual story, one would see that there
was no "major" anything behind the headline. The headlines that pop up on our mainstream news
(MSN) home pages are designed to plant a seed in the minds of people too busy to click and read the
actual story.
The Editor says...
That's why you shoud be able to spot a click-bait headline and ignore it.
22
Years of Blowback from the USA Patriot Act. [Scroll down] News cycle
distractions are calibrated to ensure that you lose sight of what the government is doing.
The average American has a hard time keeping up with and remembering all of the "events,"
manufactured or otherwise, which occur like clockwork and keep us distracted, deluded, amused, and
insulated from the reality of the American police state. Whether these events are critical or
unimportant, when we're being bombarded with wall-to-wall news coverage and news cycles that change
every few days, it's difficult to stay focused on one thing — namely, holding the
government accountable to abiding by the rule of law — and the powers-that-be understand
this. In this way, regularly scheduled trivia and/or distractions that keep the citizenry
tuned into the various breaking news headlines and entertainment spectacles also keep them tuned
out to the government's steady encroachments on their freedoms.
Here's
Why The Media's Lies About Rep. Jamaal Bowman Should Concern You. During a
series of contentious spending votes on Saturday ahead of a looming government shutdown, while
House Democrats were trying to slow-walk a vote, Democrat Rep. Jamaal Bowman pulled a fire
alarm in a House office building on Capitol Hill, forcing an evacuation. Bowman's stunt,
which is under investigation by Capitol Police, was caught on a security camera. It's clear
he pulled the fire alarm as a delaying tactic, precisely to force the evacuation of the building
and disrupt official congressional business (the kind of thing the media would call an
"insurrection" if a Republican had done it.) [...] But here's the important thing: Bowman's
claim is that he thought pulling the fire alarm would open the door. That sounds like an
outlandish lie, doesn't it? The sort of patently false thing no one in his right mind
would ever believe or even try to explain. Just a bone-crushingly idiotic fiction that
requires us to believe Bowman is mentally ill or psychotic. Every single person in Washington
knows it's not true. And yet, every single Democrat and the entire corporate news media
immediately responded as if it were a reasonable and acceptable explanation for Bowman's actions,
like of course he didn't know what would happen when he pulled the alarm. He thought it would
open the door, OK? How many of us have encountered a locked door and immediately pulled the
nearest fire alarm?
Please
Stop Telling Us Everything Is Fine With the Economy. Two weeks ago, Nobel
Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman told CNN anchor Christiane Amanpour there is a peculiar
disconnect between how the economy is doing and how the public is feeling about it. [...] People
think the economy is bad because they are paying, at least here in western Pennsylvania, $3.99 a
gallon for gas, and in places such as Arizona, where the state now ranks seventh among the nation's
highest-paying markets at $4.69; last week alone it climbed 14 cents a gallon. In Nevada, it
jumped a whopping 33 cents a gallon, with California coming in at a 29-cents-a-gallon jump.
When gas prices rise, food prices rise.
Bring back
the chaos then. Less than a month after President Trump's inauguration, Time magazine
rolled out the Democrat-RINO message of a chaotic White House. Its proof was as thin as the
hair atop John Fetterman's head. Time reported, "Federal judges in four courts froze a
hastily issued Executive Order barring certain immigrants from entering the country.
Intelligence officials leaked descriptions of classified intercepts in a winning attempt to force
Trump to fire his National Security Adviser, Michael Flynn, who had misled the nation about his
ties with a Russian diplomat. Then more leaks came, from current and former officials to the
New York Times, asserting that Trump campaign aides and senior Russian intelligence officials had
been in contact during the 2016 presidential campaign. [...]" That was not chaos. That was
sabotage by the deep state and its seditious resistance. The leaks were illegal and impossible
to fact-check. But reporters claim they need access and so they go with leaky stories
regardless of how true they may be because they need access to even juicier stories that may
or may not be true.
Univision
Host Amplifies Florida Curriculum Hoax In Fox News GOP Debate. The Univision co-host
of the Fox News Republican presidential debate reinforced false leftist narratives Wednesday night
when pressing Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis on his state's K-12 curriculum. Univision's Ilia
Calderon implied DeSantis promoted educational standards that suggested slavery benefitted the
victims. The question emanates from claims Vice President Kamala Harris fabricated this
summer. "Florida's new Black History curriculum says 'slaves developed skills that in some
instances could be applied for their personal benefit,'" Calderon said, ignoring that the left-wing
College Board has apparently made nearly identical statements. "You have said, 'Slaves developed
skills in spite of slavery, not because of it.' But many are still hurt. For descendants of
slaves, this is personal. What is your message to them?" The Florida governor attacked
the question as a "hoax" engineered by the vice president to smear Republicans as racist.
The Editor says...
Dishonest left-wing talking heads on TV often make little speeches and inject socialist talking
points while pretending to ask a question.
Whose idea was it to invite Ilia Calderón? How many Republicans watch Univision? How many Univision viewers become Republicans? Second
GOP Debate Marred By Univision Moderator's Anti-American HATE and LIES. The second GOP
presidential primary debate Wednesday night was a case study in why the Republican Party shouldn't award
debate moderation privileges to hostile and dishonest members of the liberal media. While Fox
Business Network occupied two of the moderator positions (Stuart Varney and Dana Perino), the third was
given to Univision anchor Ilia Calderón. Her questions were by far the most anti-American and
dishonest; ranging from lies about gun violence being "unique" to America to blaming America for the
drug trafficking at the southern border, and more. In a question directed to North Dakota governor
Doug Burgum, Calderón peddled the liberal media's BIG LIE about gun violence: "Mental health
concerns are not unique to United States. But gun violence is." Back here in reality, Central
American and South American countries were some of the most dangerous countries in the world. Their
violence was often cited as a primary driver of illegal immigration to the U.S. According to reporting
from NPR, those countries have per capita violent gun death rates many times that of the U.S.
The
ten commandments of liberalism. Liberalism has been likened to a religious movement-
a secular quest for heaven on earth. Like legitimate religions, it has its own tenets.
Thou shalt seek social justice. We're all in this together. [...] Thou shalt
embrace diversity. Diversity is our strength. Not really. Diverse forces
flying off in their own direction weaken a society's locus. Strength lies in overcoming
diversity. [...] Liberal activism, especially since the advent of woke progressivism, has evolved
into an atheistic, fundamentalist "religion." Fundamentalism involves strict ideologic adherence,
conformity, and maintenance of an in group-out group distinction. At its core are ideological
lay preachers who confer eternal damnation onto those heretics and apostates who challenge its
self-appointed role of secular clergy. Its apostles — media, academia, HR
departments — are driven by self-righteous, prejudicial, vengeful hypocrisy.
Liberal dogma knows no compromise. Nonconformists must be silenced, forcibly if necessary.
BBC
'Disinformation' Reporter Caught Lying on Her Resume. The BBC's so-called
"Disinformation Correspondent" Marianna Spring has added yet more controversy to the corrupt
"fact-checking" industry as she was caught lying on her resume. Spring is facing claims that
she filled her resume with "disinformation" about her experience in order to advance her
career. According to a report from the Daily Mail, about five years ago Spring was trying to
get work as a freelancer in Moscow for U.S.-based news site Coda Story. When Spring applied
to the website's Editor-in-Chief Natalia Antelava in 2018, she said she had worked alongside BBC
correspondent Sarah Rainsford.
Climate
scientist: Yes, I cooked my Nature article on global warming — and here's
why. Consider this lengthy essay an exposé of a kind of Unified Field Theory
of Academia-Media Corruption. It's not so much that Patrick T. Brown reveals any new angles,
but at the Free Press, the climate scientist connects many of the dots — and from the
inside, at least at the time. [...] Brown still stands behind that paper, although he has since
left his job in Academia for a non-profit where he can speak and act more freely. In the
narrow confines of his paper, limited to only climate change, he writes that his paper remains
accurate and useful. But because the media and Academia establishments are now limiting all
discussion of practically any natural phenomena to "climate change," much of the causes of wildfires
remains undiscussed — and so, therefore, do any practical policies that would mitigate
them. That is no accident, Brown argues, and it is very well known in scientific circles: [...]
The
public isn't being told the full truth about the climate threat. Patrick Brown, the
co-director of climate and energy at the Breakthrough Institute in California, has blown the
whistle on an open secret about climate science: it's biased in favour of alarmism. He
published a paper in Nature magazine on the effect of climate change on wildfires. In
it he told the truth: there was an effect. But not the whole truth: other factors play a
big role in fires too. On Maui, the failure of the electric utility to manage vegetation
along power lines was a probable cause of the devastating recent fires, but climate change proved a
convenient excuse. Editors at journals such as Nature seem to prefer publishing
simplistic, negative news and speculation about climate change. "It is standard practice to
calculate impacts for scary hypothetical future warming scenarios that strain credibility," wrote
Brown. So, after learning this lesson the hard way when his nuanced papers were rejected, he
adapted his latest to suit their apparent prejudices — and it was published.
A
Preview Of How The Dishonest Media Will Lie And Mislead About Trump's Show Trials. As
we wait for the political show trials of Donald Trump to begin, it's good to remember a hard and
fast rule: Quotes and summaries of events reported by the corporate media are always either
half wrong or deliberately misleading. A perfect example of that truism was provided this
week by Axios' Mike Allen, who claimed Monday that Georgia Democrat prosecutor Fani Willis included
an "Easter egg" in her I'm-a-very-serious-lawyer indictment. Allen said that a specific
portion of the documents had "a twist" that "could spoil" Trump's legal team's effort to have the
entire case moved to federal court, a move that could possibly secure him a more favorable jury (as
opposed to the pool of "marginalized, underserved and disadvantaged" voters he would surely get in
Fulton County). That "twist" is an open letter Trump sent to Georgia Secretary of State Brad
Raffensperger in September 2021, which was after the former president was out of office, thus
supposedly undercutting the Trump team's assertion that the criminal charges are purely federal in
nature, rather than addressable at the county court level. In that letter, the indictment
notes, Trump solicited Raffensperger to "unlawfully" undo the 2020 election outcome "and announce
the true winner."
Fox
News and Martha MacCallum Caught Presenting Koch Brothers Activist as Fake GOP Voter in Wisconsin
to Support Ron DeSantis. By now we are all too familiar with the schemes and plots of
the corporate media as they participate in the political illusion of choice game. However,
for Rupert Murdoch and Fox News debate moderator Martha MacCallum, this catch shreds the remaining
little credibility they carried. Fox News is hosting the GOP debate in Wisconsin.
During this build up segment, Martha MacCallum introduces the "random Republican voters" in
Wisconsin who will watch the debate. Except, well... there's a little problem.
MacCallum introduces Chris Lawrence as a "Wisconsin GOP voter" who seemingly supports Ron
DeSantis. However, MacCallum fails to mention that Chris Lawrence actually works for the Koch
Network, who have recently pledged to spend $70 million to defeat President Trump. Not
only has Chris Lawrence worked for the Koch Network for the past 9 years, he is also the Senior
Field Director for the Koch group Americans for Prosperity. In essence, Lawrence is a
political operative planted in the group by Fox News to support Ron DeSantis and make it appear
like he is an innocuous voter.
A
Reckoning on COVID Coverage. [Scroll down] In both the CDC and FDA
examples, you didn't need to be a virologist or epidemiologist to expose the glaring weakness of
their argument. Yet no major conservative media did so at the time. One Fox newscaster
repeated the FDA's "You're not a horse" tweet, but he made no mention that IVM comes in human
tablet form which the FDA has made hard to get. Why not? [...] There occurred no critical
analysis of an entire host of COVID issues, including lockdowns, medical establishment sabotage of
hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, vaccine side effects, issues with remdesivir, etc. (A
notable exception is the Epoch Times, which has offered extensive, scholarly and critical
COVID coverage throughout.) Another problem among conservative news outlets was that they
routinely, robotically and uncritically printed Reuters and AP articles, taking their COVID
reporting at face value.
Stop
Saying That 'It Can't Happen Here' — It IS Happening Here. But make no mistake,
tyranny is here. It's hidden by state-run news outlets that distract us from the truth with
stories about little green men and Lizzo's latest chunky stunt. They lie to Americans on
their 24-hour news propaganda platforms about our own president's skullduggery with China and
downplay or ignore the ramifications that chicanery presents, such as spy balloons left unfettered,
a border left open, secret Chinese police stations, and more than 13,000 military-aged Chinese
people flooding into our nation. Our leaders lie to us with "The sky is falling" flapdoodle about
how climate change and phantom white supremacy, not the tyranny they sponsor, will be our downfall.
The
climate scaremongers: Heatwave hysteria. The New York Intelligencer
magazine called it the 'Worldwide Heatwave', which according to the UN has 'engulfed the Northern
Hemisphere'. It was of course nothing of the sort, simply the usual mix of hot and cold
weather we see every year. [...] The Telegraph made several claims which were not borne out
by events. For instance:
[#1] They claimed that 41.8C in Rome was a record. However in 2005 temperatures there hit 42C.
[#2] They said temperatures in Sicily might reach 48C. They got to 45C, well below the record of 48.8C.
[#3] They said temperatures in Madrid and Rome could reach 'mid to high 40s' — in the event, Madrid got to 39C and Rome to 41C.
Overheated.
The short version is an underwater Pacific Ocean volcano named Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai, 490 feet
under the waves, massively erupted, bigger than any other modern eruption, even bigger than Mount
Pinatubo. You never heard about it since it was underwater and nobody died. But
the erupting lava instantly vaporized fantastic, unimaginable amounts of sea water, which billowed
into the atmosphere, changing the water composition of Earth's atmosphere and heating it up for
years. [...] But I bet you never heard anything about Hunga Tonga, did you? Thanks,
media. [...] For the first time since tracking began, the amount of water vapor in the atmosphere
is pegged out at the maximum, across the board. Here's why corporate media is ignoring the
most dramatic climate even in modern history: because you can't legislate underwater
volcanoes. You can try, but they won't listen. So what's the fun in that?
Corporate media only exists to further political ends. Since volcanoes aren't subject to
politics, why bother?
How
modern media became the world's second-oldest profession. The New York Times (NYT)
and Washington Post (WaPo), from their perch atop the liberal media pyramid as it evolved in the
wake of the JournoList, drove the content of the rest of the mainstream media ecosystem. CNN,
MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, NPR, HuffPo, Slate, Politico, and myriad other liberal outlets took their
lead from NYT and WaPo. As such, seeding a story in either of these outlets guaranteed media
saturation. It's widely recognized that NYT is the outlet of choice for the FBI and the
national law enforcement (DOJ...) blob, while WaPo is the go-to outlet for the CIA and other
elements of the national intelligence blob. Both our law enforcement and intelligence
communities worked overtime to seed the Russiagate stories, both knowing how false they were, into
these outlets and into the conscience of the American public. The question that must be asked
here is, where were the real reporters? Why would they risk their credibility reporting
"stories" always laden with anonymous sources, from both the intelligence and law enforcement
communities, without questioning the motives of those sources or outing them once it was known that
the information they provide was false?
CNBC
releases list of 'best and worst states to live in'. CNBC recently released a
remarkable ranking of "America's 10 worst states to live and work in for 2023."
Unsurprisingly, considering the source, the list consists exclusively of red states. The
rankings were purportedly based on crime rates, environmental quality, health care, quality and
availability of childcare, and inclusiveness in state laws such as reproductive rights, protections
against discrimination, and voting rights. Oh, got it. Guess we know how they weighted
these factors. Access to unfettered abortion ("reproductive rights"), worship of the LGBTQ
community ("Protection against discrimination"), and the "right" to vote sans identification, via
mail, and early and often, obviously superseded "crime rates." [Lists omitted for brevity.]
Notice something oddly amusing, gentle readers? Most of the states CNBC ranked as the worst
in which to live and work are the states everyone is moving to, and several of the states it
ranked as the best in which to live and work are the ones everyone is moving from.
The
Left's 2020 'Fake Electors' Narrative Is Fake News. Headlines recently proclaimed
that eight of Trump's "fake" electors accepted immunity deals. Of course, in reporting the
news, the corporate outlets all missed the real story — that the electors' testimony
failed to incriminate anyone, including Trump, and that the county prosecutors engaged in
massive misconduct. Equally appalling, however, was the corrupt media's continued peddling of
the "fake electors" narrative. There were no "fake" electors. There were contingent
Republican electors named consistent with legal precedent to preserve the still ongoing legal
challenges to the validity of Georgia's certified vote. Nor was appointing an alternative
slate of electors some cockamamie plan devised by Trump lawyers. On the contrary, Trump's
election lawyers and the contingent electors followed the precise approach Democrats successfully
used when the date Congress established for certifying an election came before the legal challenges
John F. Kennedy had brought in Hawaii were decided. And that approach allowed Kennedy to be
certified the winner of Hawaii's three electoral votes on Jan. 6, 1961, even though the Aloha
State had originally certified Richard Nixon the victor.
Press
roosters crow about Joe Biden for a fake economic sunrise. Washington Post columnist
Catherine Rampell would have you think what Joe Biden thinks — that he is the hero of
the American economy just because inflation has stopped ballooning: [...] It's garbage. Joe
Biden is still attempting to force people to buy electric cars and is handing out green goodies to
people who claim they can control the climate. There is also his intentional destruction of
companies that produce reasonably priced energy. The price of crude oil is down from its high
but is still over 75% higher than it was before he took office. (Note to Catherine: Please describe
which of Biden's policies brought crude oil down.) The price of energy affects everything.
Crude oil is used in over 6,000 products. Statistical inflation increases have been reduced to
3% or 4% but Americans are still suffering. He is forcing all federal projects to use prevailing
wages which inflate costs. He is taking away the ability for healthy people to buy reasonably
priced health insurance policies.
Don't
Believe The Leftist Media Narrative About The State of the 2024 Race. To the surprise
of no one, the leftist corporate media's coverage of the 2024 presidential race has been
abysmal. Predictably, their reporting is full of omissions, half truths, and wishful thinking.
Once again, they only report their preferred narratives, in a desperate attempt to persuade stupid
people and gullible news outlets into believing them, including Conservative Inc.
As usual the leftist coastal elites are attempting to shape their perceptions into reality.
Climate
Fact Check: June 2023 Edition. Ten more false climate claims from June have already
gone bust and are presented below. [#1] Canadian forest fires caused by climate change?
Smoky American skies caused by Canadian wildfires are not new. The historical record shows
Canadian wildfires have darkened U.S. skies repeatedly since 1706. [...] [#4] Florida strawberries
suffering from climate change? As shown in the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) chart
[not seen here], Florida's strawberry harvests increased nearly 50 percent between 2001 and 2019.
[#5] Summers getting hotter? The New York Times reported in "Tracking Dangerous Heat in the
U.S." that: "Summer temperatures have become hotter and more extreme in recent decades." Fact
Check. The New York Times uses the 1951-1980 global cooling period as the baseline temperature
and ignores hot summers before 1940.
The
Big Gaslight. The term "gaslighting" was just selected word of the year because of
its overuse. But why would that usage increase have happened? Maybe because the
practice itself has become more common as a political weapon. In practical parlance,
"gaslighting" means trying to persuade others not to believe their "lying eyes," or not to believe
what they already had known as established fact. Recent examples of such disinformation
themes include:
• The summer 2020 riots were not really riots but "mostly peaceful" demonstrations.
• The Hunter Biden laptop emails are not real but instead a Russian disinformation tactic.
• The U.S. southern border is closed.
• It was Republicans, not Democrats, who favored defunding the police.
• Voter ID requirements are actually voter suppression.
• Critical Race Theory is not really racist — and is not being taught in schools anyway.
• The Afghanistan surrender/retreat was really a great achievement and success.
Curiously, all these familiar ploys are authored by the same political camp.
13
Reasons Joe Biden Isn't The 'Ethical' President Time Magazine Claims. The corporate
media kicked off the week with another outrageous story to spin President Joe Biden, the man guilty
of politically persecuting his chief political opponent and potentially selling American policy out
to foreign adversaries, as an "ethical" president. Biden is "reset[ting] the guardrails
against ... abuses of power" and "increas[ing] public trust in government," reads a Time magazine
article unironically titled, "Biden Is Resetting the Ethical Norms Trump Trampled as President."
"President Biden is proud to have restored respect for the rule of law and will not exploit his
office with convention events on the White House lawn," Deputy Press Secretary Andrew Bates told
the magazine. "He will not exploit his office for political gain in the way that we saw in the
last administration," Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre added. Below are 13 reasons Biden
is not "ethical," and may in fact go down as one of the most corrupt and immoral presidents
in American history.
The
press just can't stop propping up Democrats. I bet no one can recall when the media
tried to help George Bush's and Donald Trump's poll numbers. Nope, they continued their
efforts to push them down because they always campaign for Democrats.
The
Liberal Media Need Shock Treatment.
• The IRS whistleblowers in the Hunter Biden matter are ignored by the liberal media.
• Biden steals thousands of classified documents — without the authority to declassify them — when he was a senator and vice-president and the story disappears.
• FBI insiders bravely reveal the blatant pro-Democratic bias of the organization and their testimony is sloughed off.
• Joe Biden commits one embarrassing verbal gaffe after another, demonstrating an unarguable diminution of mental acuity, and the video clips are nowhere to be seen on the mainstream stations.
• James Comer finds one ironclad, tangible example after another of inappropriate, even illegal, financial dealings by the entire Biden family and Comer's investigation is dismissed by the liberal media as unfounded hearsay.
• Talk of the 2016 presidential election being stolen by President Trump from Hillary is hailed as heroic, patriotic protest, but presenting the mountains of indisputable evidence of 2020 election fraud committed by the Democrats against President Trump gets you branded as a traitor by the mainstream media.
This list of examples could go on and on, but for the sake of brevity and current relevance, we'll leave it there.
Here's
How You Know Conservatives Are Winning. If you want a good indication that
conservatives are, at long last, scoring a few actual victories these days, look at the apoplexy
it's causing those on the left. A prime example is a piece written by Jill Lawrence, a former
editor at USA Today, which posted on July 4 on MSNBC and carried the scary title: "Seeing the
erosion of our freedoms makes it hard to celebrate this Fourth of July." It is a remarkable display
of fearmongering, incoherence, and illogic. "The Supreme Court, conservative governors and
gerrymandered state legislatures are racing to shrink fundamental rights and freedoms," Lawrence
writes. "The result is that tens of millions of Americans are being deprived of rights that other
Americans have. The scale of the disparity is frightening and growing." Ok. So, how
about some examples?
Has
the mainstream press lost all desire to investigate climate alarmist claims? Being
something of a questioning soul, I have found mainstream news sources somewhat unsatisfactory in
recent years — banal reporting, simplistic (and error-strewn) reporting and homages to
vested interests have turned me off the commonly used channels for consuming the output of the
fourth estate. Having leafed through various fairly anodyne articles that mostly avoided the
difficult questions of the day, tucked away on page 36 was a small article by the environment
editor of The Times entitled "Antarctic Ice Melts to 'Shocking' Low". Intrigued —
because there are some fascinating observations coming from the world's oceans that are worthy of
closer investigation — I read the article in more detail. I was genuinely
astonished. Not, I should say, by the quality of the article, or the incisiveness of the
reporting. I was astonished by the extent — not of any ice loss — but
of the twisting of facts to fit an agenda. Bereft of nuance, we seem to be spiralling into a
polarised world where broadsheet 'journalism' can see fit to distill context-free factoids into an
easily-digestible apocalyptic pill to be popped down a reader's gullet: [...]
Under
Biden, Fake News Soars to Whole New Level. "Biden calls China's Xi a dictator;
Beijing slams remark as 'provocation,'" headlined the Washington Post on June 20. "Biden
calls Xi a dictator, who was kept in the dark about spy balloon," chimed in the New York Times.
[...] That is not exactly the same as saying "China's Xi Jinping is a dictator," or "Xi Jinping is
like other dictators." Contrary to what the reports assume, Xi Jinping would have no problem with
the label. The People's Republic of China is a Communist country, and in
Marxist-Leninist doctrine the dictatorship of the proletariat rules. Mao Zedong, Deng
Xiaoping, Jiang Zemin, Hu-Wen and Xi Jinping are all totalitarian dictators in the true
sense. Marxist-Leninist doctrine allows no party but the Communist Party, and the Party
decides who will run the show. Xi Jinping is the man of the hour, and the notion he "didn't
know" about the balloon is ludicrous.
Living
in a Media World. From National Public Radio (aka state radio), I've gained
information that while guns are dangerous in the hands of most of our fellow citizens, they are
necessary for transgendered Americans, who must stockpile them because of "hateful rhetoric." Our
brave sexual pioneers are being constantly threatened by Christian bigots and other vicious
obscurantists. NPR has also taught me that whatever riots followed the killing of George
Floyd were mostly peaceful and that the slaying of Jordan Neely by Daniel Penny was driven by
contempt for a minority member struggling with mental illness. The transgendered youth who
murdered six people, including three children, in a Christian school in Nashville did not really
cause this "tragedy." The non-binary shooter was a victim of Christian prejudice and "the gun
lobby," and what he did out of emotional desperation led to "an escalation of hate" against the
LGBT community. Yesterday I had the scales fall further from my eyes when I discovered that
Hunter Biden had not committed a host of felonies, some of which implicated his dad. Hunter
is a recovering drug addict whom Joe Scarborough on MSNBC is defending against "hyperventilating
right-wingers" who have taken their playbook from Joe McCarthy[.]
Did
You Breathe Smoke Last Week? This is Why. Michael Walsh published the below
piece on his the-pipeline.org last week, and in the meantime, the propaganda press has issued one
full-throated [objection] after another. I scan them, not one single writer has ever been to
a forest, he is grabbing paras from another, and another grabs another paragraph, all ending in a
mess of words that add up to something issued from the WEF's PR Department. I thought for
a split second Jim Geraghty at National Review would be sensible. He was not.
Media
blames 'climate change' for Canadian wildfires despite arrest of multiple arsonists.
Despite the arrest of multiple arsonists, the mainstream media in Canada seems intent on
attributing the nation's recent wildfires to "climate change." As wildfires continue to
spread across western, and now central and eastern Canada, burning forestland and homes, the
mainstream media continues to imply that climate change is the main culprit, despite a growing
number of reports showing that arsonists have been arrested for allegedly setting dozens of fires.
Target
Received Bomb Threats From the 'LGBTQ+ Community.' The Media Told a Different Story.
Target stores across America were evacuated over the weekend due to bomb threats that alleged the
chain had "betrayed the LGBTQ+ community" and "bowed to the wishes of far-right extremists who want
to exterminate us," according to police. But that's not how some major news outlets presented
the story. The Washington Post, USA Today, and others buried or simply left out
the nature of the emailed threats, all of which were false alarms, while prominently mentioning
conservative backlash over Target's LGBT Pride merchandise.
The
Leftist Green Agenda Is Buying Its Way Into The News. One recent analysis found AP
stories mentioned the phrases "climate change," "global warming," and "Climate disaster" hundreds
of times since receiving grants totaling $8 million in early 2022. The stated purpose of the
money is to fund the AP's "Climate Journalism Initiative," which would employ 20 new reporters to
"transform how the AP covers the climate story." Perhaps it also funded the story that gave us
Biden's hard-hat environmentalism? In another example from the story, former top Clinton
adviser John Podesta is heavily quoted in his role as overseer of the $369 billion for green
energy from Biden's so-called Inflation Reduction Act. The story fails to mention Podesta's
political operative past, including his unofficial title of "White House clean-up chief" during the
Clinton years. Also quoted are the extreme eco-groups the Natural Resources Defense Council
and Center for Biological Diversity. They are all given a lot of space in a story with a lot
of reach. As a wire service, the hard-hat rebranding from the AP will appear in thousands of
newspapers across the world as news. We don't know if the millions the AP received for climate
coverage played a role in helping Biden rebrand his energy policy, and that's precisely the point.
Blame
the Media for the National Debt. Democrats and Republicans reached an agreement to
lift the debt ceiling, and nothing is going to change in the disturbing pattern of America's
national debt climbing by leaps and bounds. The best reason for pessimism? Our
Democrat-messaging media. They can't be bothered to offer the most basic facts in budget
coverage. What is the budget for the current fiscal year? What was the last budget
deficit? How large is the national debt? These are questions that are rarely answered
by news anchors. What we get is a lot of horse-race jockeying and finger-pointing instead of
facts. They must think the viewers are too stupid to juggle numbers.
'The
Official Truth': The End of Free Speech That Will End America. According to a survey
by Rasmussen Reports, 59% of likely voters in the United States view the corporate news media as
"truly the enemy of the people." This is a majority view, held regardless of race: "58%
of whites, 51% of black voters, and 68% of other minorities" — all agree that the
mainstream media has become their "enemy." This scorching indictment of the Fourth Estate
piggybacks similar polling from Harvard-Harris showing that Americans hold almost diametrically
opposing viewpoints from those that news corporations predominantly broadcast as the official "truth."
Big
Picture Explanation of What Happened in the Past 15 Years. In the 50 years that
preceded 2008, those same groups had an approach of distrust toward government, and the media
apparatus had a very distinct supportive and cynical outlook, favorable to the leftist
anti-government perspective. Now, all of that has reversed — seemingly
flipped. In the 50 years that preceded 2008, media pushed a one-way narrative in defense
of those who were "targeted" by the institutions and mechanisms of government. As the
activists railed against the regime, the media framed narratives to excuse the transparently
guilty. Now, that entire dynamic has reversed. Now we see the media pushing a narrative
in support of weaponized government targeting, and — here's the kicker —
framing the transparently innocent. The activists went from accusing government of
wrongdoing and defending the transparently guilty — to aligning with government,
excusing government wrongdoing, and helping to attack the transparently innocent.
Corporate
Media's Coverage Of The Debt-Limit Fight Is Intolerably Dishonest. [Scroll down]
Biden and Chuck Schumer gambled that Republicans would never unify around a debt-ceiling hike.
Schumer kept snarkily demanding McCarthy show the public his plans. House Republicans did —
one that "slashes" spending all the way back to 2022 levels and then allows one percent increases
per year moving forward. Everyone on the left, which is to say most people in political journalism,
keep framing the debate as if this never happened. So while we can't bore into the souls of the
participants and expose their true feeling about a potential default, the fact is that the only people
in that entire conversation who have already passed a hike to the debt limit are House
Republicans. Democrats could just sign off on it if they wanted. No default.
No one, of course, expects Democrats to unilaterally surrender. But media always covers
negotiations over spending as if the organic center, the endpoint, the only reasonable place to be,
stands not between the desires of two competing political parties or two competing branches of
government but rather wherever Democrats happen to reside.
Harris-Harvard
poll: liberal corporate media is radically out of touch with the views of Americans.
It's not just that corporate media rejects Americans' views. They don't permit those views to
be heard. To start: Majorities of Americans say it's *false* that Trump colluded with
Russia. The the Steele Dossier is also "false." In other words, they view the story the
US media aggressively centered for 3 years as a hoax and a fraud, yet NBC and CNN won't even air
this view. Americans also believe that the materials on the Hunter Biden laptop are real, and
are not and never were "Russian disinformation." So again, Americans view the claim that the
US corporate media and CIA spread for weeks before the 2020 election — to help Biden
win — as a fraud. Majorties of Americans also believe:
• Hunter Biden engaged in criminal influence peddling using his father's name.
• The FBI is not investigating these crimes.
• Joe Biden participated in Hunter's illegal influence peddling and profiteering schemes.
Moscow
on the Potomac. Picture living in the Soviet Union circa 1980. You wake up and
turn on state-run radio. The great war in Afghanistan is going exceptionally well. You
know that story is a lie, as your neighbors just buried their son, and your cousin tells of the
horrors of fighting the Mujahideen in the frozen mountains. The next story speaks of the
great economic success of the most recent Five Year Plan. You know that it's also a lie, as
there has been no meat in the local stores for weeks, and the lines outside of bakeries are only
getting longer. [...] Now, let's move to the present-day US. You get up and turn on any of the
morning programs with the presenters who do not know how to stop smiling. They tell us that
the war in Ukraine is so successful that the US and its allies will be sending a few billion
dollars more in weaponry shortly. Next, you learn that inflation is actually good for you, as
it is proof of a successful economy. You see that many items that you used to buy are too
expensive, but hey, but now you know it's a good thing. And forget about baby formula.
An
Appeal to the Thinkers Left Politically Abandoned. [Scroll down] No matter
your political beliefs, you likely align yourself with one of these three broad philosophies
[Conservatism, Progressivism, Independent]. News stories would make you think the nation is
ideologically split down the middle though, between right and left. However, 25% identify as
Liberal or Progressive, while 73% of Americans identify as conservative or moderate. You
wouldn't be aware of this if you relied on Democrat messaging and a breathless press that
constantly "informs" you otherwise. Moderates historically defect from conservative thought
when mainstream outlets do not report important news, or slant events unfavorably.
TV
portrays Covid vax victims as Coronavirus deaths. The three screenshots below come
from the closing one-minute segment of the nightly news show News Watch 9 on NHK, the Japanese
equivalent to the BBC, which aired on Monday. The segment title in the top-right reads
"Various feelings about returning to normality." The full segment (which can be viewed with
English subtitles [elsew]here) is a montage of footage contrasting Tokyo streets deserted during
states of emergency and now full of tourists in addition to the three bereaved people below and
photos of their dead family members. You get the idea. Now, based on what NHK shows
them saying, what would you assume their family members died from? If you assumed they died
from Covid, as the millions of NHK viewers who saw the segment doubtlessly did, you'd be completely
wrong. The three people above are actually members of the Bereaved Families of Covid
Vaccination Victims that I wrote about in November. But the segment didn't mention that fact
or anything about vaccines. NHK's creatively deceptive editing generated such a tsunami of
criticism on social media that it issued an apology at the end of News Watch 9 the following night.
CNN
shows Anderson Cooper 360 and Primetime make NO mention of discredited FBI probe into baseless
Trump-Russia claims network previously claimed were 'corroborated'. Struggling CNN
spent all of primetime ignoring John Durham's investigation that tore apart the FBI for launching a
baseless probe into claims of Donald Trump's collusion with Russia. The network's two highest
profile nightly shows - Primetime and Anderson Cooper 360 - each failed to mention the probe by the
special counsel in two hours of programming. CNN was among liberal media outlets obsessed
with Trump-Russia collusion claims when they first emerged, with since-fired former anchor Don
Lemon claiming the infamous Steele Dossier had been partly corroborated.
The
Left's 2020 'Fake Electors' Narrative Is Fake News. Headlines recently proclaimed
that eight of Trump's "fake" electors accepted immunity deals. Of course, in reporting the
news, the corporate outlets all missed the real story — that the electors' testimony
failed to incriminate anyone, including Trump, and that the county prosecutors engaged in massive
misconduct. Equally appalling, however, was the corrupt media's continued peddling of the
"fake electors" narrative. There were no "fake" electors. There were contingent
Republican electors named consistent with legal precedent to preserve the still ongoing legal
challenges to the validity of Georgia's certified vote. Nor was appointing an alternative
slate of electors some cockamamie plan devised by Trump lawyers. On the contrary, Trump's
election lawyers and the contingent electors followed the precise approach Democrats successfully
used when the date Congress established for certifying an election came before the legal challenges
John F. Kennedy had brought in Hawaii were decided. And that approach allowed Kennedy to
be certified the winner of Hawaii's three electoral votes on Jan. 6, 1961, even though the
Aloha State had originally certified Richard Nixon the victor. The Hawaii scenario in 1960
mirrors in every material respect the facts on the ground in Georgia on Dec. 14,
2020 — the date both the Democrat and Republican presidential electors met and cast
their 16 electoral votes for Joe Biden and Donald Trump respectively.
Weaponizing
Death. Recently, there has been a spate of horrific murders. The killers,
whether committing mass shootings or single homicides, are hard to stereotype. [...] Unfortunately,
these tragedies have increasingly become politicized. Yet our media and politicians do not
apply a common standard of reporting about either the victims, the killers, or the apparent motives
and circumstances of the violence. Instead, each horror is quickly analyzed for its political
usefulness. Then its details are selectively downplayed or emphasized, depending upon the
political agenda at work. A sad example was the terrible murder spree at the private
Christian Covenant School in Nashville, Tennessee. A transgender male shot and killed six
people, including three 9-year-old children. Almost immediately, three media narratives
emerged. One, semi-automatic weapons, not the killer Audrey Hale, were mostly responsible for
the massacre. Two, the shooter's transgender identity profile played no role in the killing
whatsoever. Three, the public had no need to know of the contents of the shooter's "manifesto."
Biden's
corrupt? The MSM shrugs. The MSM spent 3 years promoting a narrative that they
knew was false about Donald Trump colluding with Russia. Not one of them could possibly
believe that it was true because it was so transparently a lie. Yet they, the intelligence
community, and every talking head spoke breathlessly about how the walls were closing in on
Trump. It took the Special Counsel to set them straight, and they still have their Pulitzer
Prizes and half the country still believes their lies. Yet Representative James Comer lays
out a straightforward, obvious case that might not stand up in court yet but is clearly true that
Joe Biden and his family have engaged in a corrupt influence peddling operation going back over a
decade and the press not only shrugs but comes to the president's defense. Comer didn't pass
the "beyond the shadow of a doubt" standard, so it is a big nothing. Look away. Those
millions of dollars from foreign nationals just MIGHT conceivably be legal or something. [Tweet]
Most
of the media doesn't care about anything unless the story fits their radical leftist
agenda. Every day we hear that there have been hundreds of mass shootings in the U.S
this year yet we see the details on only a few. Why don't we ever see the details of all the
mass shootings in Chicago and elsewhere that involve black gang members shooting other
blacks? Why don't we see the names of the victims, the records of the shooters, and the
motives? The answer is it doesn't fit the agenda. We see little interest in all the
subway and street crimes in New York each day, but when a white Marine hero gets involved to
protect people from a mentally ill, black, career criminal and accidentally kills him, he is
accused of murder and there is endless coverage and violent protests. A Hispanic commits a
mass murder in Texas, and he has magically been converted to a white supremacist and we get huge
coverage. It reminds me of when the media converted the Hispanic shooter George Zimmerman to
white in order to gin up racial hate and division. When a black teen, who had robbed a store
in Ferguson, Mo, reached for a white cop's gun, the cop defended himself and killed the teen.
Instead of telling the truth, the media and others regurgitated the fake "hands up don't shoot"
narrative to gin up racial hate and violence. How many cops have been killed and injured
because of that false narrative?
How
Liars Wreck a Country. Last year, Forbes concluded that "only 16% of adults in the
U.S. say they have a great deal or quite a lot of confidence in newspapers, and just 11% said the
same for television news." Anyone confronting these stats must conclude that our media are
deeply incompetent or crooked or both. The New York Times announced a few years ago that
defeating Trump was the important thing. They gave themselves a free pass to lie all they
want. How can they now reclaim their honor or their usefulness? [...] Unfortunately, our
liberal journalists do not care about true or false. When they hear an assertion, they try to
determine whether it will help their agenda... their narrative. If it won't help, they know
they must attack the assertion, typically by declaring it debunked, fake news, or
misinformation.
Andy
Ngô sheds light on bizarre reporting about Allen, TX mass shooter Garcia in thread.
Full transparency, this has been the craziest media push after a mass shooting in a long while, and at
this time this editor can honestly not say what is and isn't the truth which is a sad reflection of
what our mainstream media have become. As Twitchy readers know, within maybe two hours of the
horrific shooting in Allen, Texas, major outlets were running with the story that Garcia 'may have had
white supremacist beliefs' based on a patch someone 'close to the story' said they saw on his vest.
Then came the claims about Garcia's social media and tattoos ... which are all over the place.
Not to mention we're not even sure at this point what Garcia actually looked like because there are
multiple pictures of different Hispanic men floating around social media. So all of that is by
itself, insane. Yes? But then add in the bizarre claims about Garcia having a white
supremacist account created on some Russian social media site?
In
a World Gone Mad, the Jordan Neelys Rule. Jordan Neely was a mentally ill homeless
man who had terrorized the citizens of New York — especially subway passengers —
for many years. He had been arrested at least 40 times for crimes ranging from assault to
disorderly conduct and fare evasion. And on the day of his death, several eyewitnesses report
that Neely had made repeated threats to the well-being of passengers, "stating his willingness to
'hurt anyone' and saying that he was unbothered by the prospect of returning to jail or being killed,"
according to NRO. [Tweet] Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez says Jordan Neely was
"murdered" because he "was houseless and crying for food in a time when the city is raising rents
and stripping services to militarize itself." So passengers and bystanders are just supposed
to allow Mr. Neely to terrorize and assault them with no thought of defending themselves?
You picked the wrong hobby horse to ride, AOC. [Tweet] AOC also didn't mention this
attack on the gay community. [Tweet]
Video
Of Jordan Neely Defecating In A Subway Station, Then Walking Around Naked (NSFW).
A video of a schizophrenic homeless man, Jordan Neely, [defecating] and then walking around naked in a
NYC subway station has surfaced. The media and BLM have done their best to portray Neely as a
friendly Micheal Jackson impersonator when in reality he was a dangerous individual with a long,
violent arrest record with little regard for the law. [Video clip]
Elon
Musk Asks Why the Media Misrepresents Interracial Crime Stats "To Such an Extreme Degree".
Twitter CEO Elon Musk questioned on Saturday why the establishment media misrepresents interracial crime
statistics "to such an extreme degree." The media's lies and false claims result in more innocent
people being killed while inciting more anti-white violence than ever. [...] Now under the control of
Musk, many hate hoaxes and disinformation is being countered, including media lies regarding Jordan Neely.
The
Auckland Mobbing of Kellie-Jay Keen Was Fuelled by Media-Peddled Misinformation.
Kellie-Jay Keen is a five-foot-one, British middle-aged mother of four children who happens to
believe that the word "woman" should be reserved for those who are biologically female. As
many Quillette readers and podcast listeners will already know, she headlined a March 25th
women's rights event in Auckland called Let Women Speak, which was shut down by protester
violence. Keen has been under fire for years from trans-rights activists (who believe that
men can become women, and vice versa, by acts of self-declaration). And many such activists
in New Zealand were quick to smear Keen as a fascist, on the basis that a small group of apparent
Nazis had showed up in the vicinity of one of her recent events in Australia.
Senate
Republicans Accuse Democrats, Media Allies of Smear Campaign against Conservative Justices.
Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee tore into their Democratic colleagues during a Tuesday
hearing on Supreme Court ethics, accusing the lawmakers of joining with their ideological allies in
the media to undermine the conservative Supreme Court majority because it stands in the way of their
desired policy outcomes. The hearing was scheduled by Judiciary Committee Democrats after
ProPublica published a series of articles detailing Justice Clarence Thomas's relationship
with Texas billionaire Harlan Crow. Despite the fact that Crow has not had business before the
Court during Thomas's tenure — with the exception of one case that was never taken up
involving a company which Crow had a minority interest in — many Democrats have seized
on the report to argue that the Court should adopt stricter ethics rules to prevent undue interference.
AP
redefined 'insurrection' to include J6 protests, then redefined it again to exclude TN and
MT protests that disrupted legislatures. Writing in Human Events, Libby Emmons calls
out the AP for redefining the word "insurrection" to apply to the January 6, 2021
demonstrators, and then, when that definition was applied by others to the left wing demonstrations
that disrupted the Tennessee and Montana state legislatures, re-redefining the term so as to solely
apply to its enemies, the pro-Trump demonstrators. I's an absolutely clear instance of AP
acting as a propaganda organ for the left, not as a news agency.
A
Guide to Understanding the Hoax of the Century. For more than half a century,
McCarthyism stood as a defining chapter in the worldview of American liberals: a warning about
the dangerous allure of blacklists, witch hunts, and demagogues. Until 2017, that is, when
another list of alleged Russian agents roiled the American press and political class. A new
outfit called Hamilton 68 claimed to have discovered hundreds of Russian-affiliated accounts
that had infiltrated Twitter to sow chaos and help Donald Trump win the election. Russia
stood accused of hacking social media platforms, the new centers of power, and using them to
covertly direct events inside the United States. None of it was true. After reviewing
Hamilton 68's secret list, Twitter's safety officer, Yoel Roth, privately admitted that his company
was allowing "real people" to be "unilaterally labeled Russian stooges without evidence or
recourse." [...] When proof emerged earlier this year that Hamilton 68 was a high-level hoax
perpetrated against the American people, it was met with a great wall of silence in the national press.
Those
scary guns the National Guard leaker possessed? Airsoft rifles. This captures
so much about the MSM. It combines total ignorance and open contempt for their audience along
with a determined insistence that whatever the intelligence community says must be accepted at face
value. Before I get into the story I want to make clear that am not a fan of dropping
classified documents into the public realm, with the exception of whistleblowers revealing the
corruption of government. I haven't followed this story closely, so I really haven't an
opinion worth sharing about the whole affair. [...] With that out of the way, I do have a strong
opinion about the propaganda we are being fed, and there appears to be proof that we are being lied to.
Teixeira
Whistleblower Case Raises Troubling Questions. Last week, 21-year-old low-level
Massachusetts Air National Guardsman Jack Douglas Teixeira was arrested and charged with violating
the Espionage Act and leaking sensitive defense material. Among other things, the leaked
top-secret documents show that the Biden administration has been misleading the public about the
reality of the situation in Ukraine, overstating the country's success in its war with
Russia. The leaked documents, which appear to include briefings prepared for senior Pentagon
leadership, including Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Mark Milley, contained assessments
from a multitude of agencies. The real story, however, is how corporate media organizations,
rather than focusing on the content of the revealing documents themselves, chose to focus on
finding out who leaked them. Only after first working to identify Teixeira as the alleged
whistleblower, which resulted in his arrest, both The Washington Post and The New York Times began
to publish "exclusive" stories about classified information — some of it still unseen by
the public — that had been leaked by Teixeira as if the discovery were their own.
'Too
Big to Fail' Is Too Big Period. A recent Gallup poll found that public confidence in
our institutions is collapsing. The only institutions that still garner majority confidence
are the military and small businesses. Nearly three quarters of Americans have lost
confidence in government, big business, academia, and the media (among others). The vast
majority of our institutions are failing. They aren't failing to survive. They're
failing to meet our expectations — which means they're failing to satisfy their reason
for being. [...] Media haven't lost our confidence because they're boring. They have lost it
because they are untruthful. They are pushing a narrative and are unwilling to sell unbiased
news or entertainment at any price.
The
Most Important Thing To Be Learned From The Teixeira (Ukraine Docs) Leaks. America no
longer has a free press; more specifically, the vast majority of the media are simply mouthpieces
for the UniParty and/or the Biden-regime: [Tweets] But just keep telling yourselves that 2024
will be different than 2020[,] that all we need to do is nominate Trump or all that we need to do
is "move on" past Trump[,] and that magically the media that routinely LIE to us will suddenly
become truth-tellers, that the ballot-harvesters will disappear, that the Democrat mega-billionaires
who are literally buying votes will go back to buying super-yachts.
BBC
News caught spreading Disinformation which accidentally confirms COVID Vaccination is in fact to
blame for Excess Deaths. Official UK Government data has revealed a startling truth
that has left the people in a state of disbelief. England and Wales suffered the highest
number of excess deaths in over half a century in 2022, and a non-stop weekly rally of excess
deaths since week 16 of 2022 that equates to 62,543 excess deaths as of March 2023. And
thanks to the BBC lying to the public, we know that the main cause of this huge increase in deaths is
COVID-19 vaccination.
Elon
Musk Takes Ownership of the BBC After Epic Exchange With Dishonest Reporter. Elon
Musk participated in an interview on Tuesday evening and ended up taking ownership of the BBC by
the time it was over. In an epic exchange, the billionaire worked over James Clayton, a
reporter from the British network, after he attempted to push claims about "hate speech" and COVID
labeling on Twitter. [...] Musk employs a strategy throughout the interview that I've long been a
fan of when interacting with the mainstream press. Namely, he doesn't accept unproven
premises that set up biased questions. When a reporter says something meant to paint you into
a corner, make them prove what they are saying is even true.
Miami
Herald isn't fit to be fish wrapper. When I wrote about Rebekah Jones' son's arrest I
relied upon the reporting of the Journal for the facts of the case. I chose to do so despite
there being a Miami Herald story because it was biased and left out the most important point: he
wasn't arrested for sharing memes, as they claimed, but for making threats to shoot up a school.
That's a bit different. [Tweets] The Herald is still soft-pedaling the story and pushing
the notion that Jones is being persecuted somehow. And Jones is tweeting up a storm with an
ever-changing story. It is a remarkable example of gaslighting, and the Herald is crying about
being criticized for pushing the story of an admitted felon.
Trump
Isn't A Special Case, He's A Test Case. Liberals might be scratching their heads over
why potential Donald Trump rivals are rushing to denounce his indictment. The reason is
simple. Conservative Republicans know that if this assault is allowed to stand, they will be
next. The left, as well as the rabble of never-Trump Republicans, like to tell everybody that
the unprecedented measures taken against Trump — culminating with this week's
indictment — are justified because he poses a unique threat to our precious
democracy. Just to review, we're talking about measures like Democrats impeaching him twice
on the flimsiest of grounds. Like federal law enforcement engaging in a coordinated campaign
to smear him as a Russian stooge. Like journalists dropping any shred of objectivity and
professionalism to attack Trump, up to and including peddling obvious falsehoods.
How
the Media Doubles Down on Falsehood. [Scroll down] Still, there are people
who blindly believe the media. My older brother called me this week, and, in our
conversation, we talked about how people, when challenged about this, would reply, "they can't put
it in the newspapers if it isn't true." Often when you point out the error of such a
statement with facts, they give you that "deer in the headlights" look. Hopefully, some
events of late might actually open some people's eyes. In an effort to look like they are
combatting this issue, we are inundated with "misinformation checkers" (aka fact checkers), who
often still miss out on important facts and whose checking often leans significantly to the
Left. And what's worse is that people still believe the administration despite its disastrous
impacts on our nation: readiness, strength, increased drug traffic and deaths due to the open
borders, the COVID and COVID vaccine lies, the inability of almost three-quarters of our youth to
even qualify for military service, long-term inflation, high energy costs, woke policies, and so
on; all with a complicit media. And still the public hasn't learned.
Not
ALL reporters are trash, but... There are isolated instances of reporters who
actually do their jobs, which last I checked was to provide information to people so that they can
make informed choices in their lives. But these days those reporters are rare, and fewer and
fewer exist in mainstream news organizations. Few politicians have the gumption to call them
out, because all people who are required to deal with the media follow the dictum that "it is never
wise to pick fights with people who buy ink by the barrel." That used to be true but is no
longer. Reporters don't care what you say, what is true, or whether you play nice with
them. They care about promoting whatever narrative they have in mind. If you feed them
what you want they will make you a hero; if not, expect to be savaged.
Mainstream
Media's New Obsession: Labelling Criticism of 15-Minute Cities 'Conspiracy Theories'.
"Conspiracy theories" about 15-minute cities are "false", "unhinged", "dangerous" and "not to be
believed", declare mainstream media in unified chorus. "In recent years, conspiracy theories
that were once almost unheard of have spread like wildfire, with a growing number of Australians
now sceptical of things like vaccines, 5G and election results," News.com.au reports in one such
article, titled, 'Inside the 15-minute city conspiracy theory sucking in gullible Australians'.
The article explains that 15-minutes cities (also called Smart Cities) are a common sense way of
attempting to boost liveability for residents. City dwellers in proposed Smart Cities —
including Melbourne, Paris, London, Edmonton and Oxford — will have access to everything
they need within a 15 to 20-minute walk, cycle or public transport trip, and that's really all there
is to it. "Anyone who has ever faced a long and painful commute will immediately see the appeal
of having the daily essentials at their fingertips," the article assures readers. However,
"gullible Australians" who cannot appreciate common sense or convenience have been "sucked in"
to a "dangerous conspiracy". These "unhinged" conspiracy theorists actually believe that Smart
Cities are "part of a secret plan by global elites to restrict people's freedom and movements" —
a form of lockdown justified by climate action.
The Editor says...
When the government nannies tell you that "you have everything you need" in your neighborhood,
they presume to know what you need, every minute of your life. In a free country, you decide for
yourself what you need, and where you would like to go.
Mainstream
Journalism Is Dead, Long Live the Age of the Private Journalist. You're more than
well aware of just how deeply the mainstream media is obedient to the whims of the Democrat Party
and leftist agendas. It shamelessly pushes narratives that encourage strict obedience to the
Democrat Party and even activist groups through fear and hate — with an emphasis on the
"fear." For instance, a couple of months ago, ABC News attempted to scare parents by telling
them that if they don't cure their child's obesity right now, then they will have it for the rest
of their lives and that includes all the health problems and issues that come with it. The
article encourages parents not to do this slowly by changing up their diet and having them get
plenty of exercise, but by giving them weight loss drugs. CBS just so happened to have a
report on a new weight loss drug for kids, and it just so happened to be out at the time of the
report and at your local drug store no less!
The Editor says...
That's not a news report, it's an infomercial.
Rathergate
redux at the NYT? And the media wonder why no one believes them any longer.
Earlier today, John picked up NPR's critical take on Rolling Stone's coverage of an arrest of an
ABC News producer last year. Be sure to read it if you missed it, but it's not the only
mainstream media outlet that should be embarrassed this week. Over the weekend, the New York
Times dragged up the hoary conspiracy theory of the 1980 October Surprise, with a single source
claiming he'd been duped into it 43 years ago — Ben Barnes. Some readers may
remember Ben Barnes from another conspiracy theory: the Texas Air National Guard (TANG) story that
blew up in the faces of CBS News execs in late 2004.
Rolling
Stone Magazine Faces New Journalism Scandal After Misleading Readers in a Big Way.
[Scroll down] This is not the first time Rolling Stone has abused and discarded
facts about a major story in order to (possibly) push an agenda. The magazine landed in
serious hot water several years ago after publishing a "bombshell" report about a gang rape on the
University of Virginia campus. That "bombshell," though, turned out to be entirely
fabricated. That story led to a major defamation case against the magazine. They were
found guilty, and the resulting damages ultimately resulted in the sale of the magazine. Of
course, the magazine has a well-known leftward bent, more recently calling Democrat Joe Manchin a
destroyer of worlds and attacking ivermectin during the COVID-19 pandemic. The case of
Siegel's report on Meek, however, isn't so much a story of lefty reporting. It's a story of
the inherent corruption of the media in general.
Time
Is Running Out To Speak Freely About Free Speech In America. Donald Trump's rise, his
successful use of social media, and new media's refusal to join the crusade against Trump caused a
fatal case of Stockholm Syndrome, with Big Tech and legacy media outlets welcoming government
requests for censorship. With support from both for-profit and nonprofit organizations and
academic institutions, a Censorship Complex emerged, embracing the government's definition of
"truth" and seeking to silence any who challenged it, whether it be new media or individual
Americans — even experts. The search for truth suffered as a result, and Americans
were deprived of valuable information necessary for self-governance. We know this because
notwithstanding the massive efforts to silence speech, a ragtag group of muckrakers persisted and
exposed several official dictates as lies: The Hunter Biden laptop was not Russian disinformation,
Covid very well may have escaped from a Wuhan lab, and Trump did not collude with Putin. But
if the Censorship Complex succeeds and silences the few journalists and outlets still willing to
challenge the government, Americans will no longer have the means to learn the truth.
Democrat
Plans [are] Looking Bad, So Biden Pivots Again. The left knows that the only way it
can achieve its long-term goals is if the populace is not paying attention. If the American
people, or a large portion of them, at least, are spending all day on TikTok or Twitter or Facebook
arguing about often petty and ridiculous ideas and fads, or, for the ones actually paying
attention, are talking about irrelevant issues, the left knows that no one will notice when the
left is doing something that will change the course of society for generations, in the most
negative ways imaginable, or feverishly covering up the massive failures of their own ideology and
policies. These distractions are not something, at this juncture, that any rational American
can afford to pay attention to. The left is launching an all-out assault on society and the
culture, a battlefield maneuver that has failed time and again in the past and resulted in
countless deaths around the world. You cannot afford to be distracted by the media.
Wonder
why most of the media aren't trusted? It is no wonder we have so much political
corruption when the media are so biased. They will create fictional stories to go after
Republicans while burying true stories about Democrats. It is absolutely pathetic! And
not once have they asked for scientific data to justify the destruction of companies that produce
reasonably priced energy... because they don't care. We have an absolutely corrupt and
incompetent man as president who is actively destroying America with radical, extreme policies and
massive taxpayer money to political supporters, and most of the media cheer about how great his
policies are.
Save it for the jury. Sacramento
Bee Apologizes for Saying Charlie Kirk Called to 'Lynch' Transgenders. The
Sacramento Bee, a Northern California-based newspaper, has apologized for falsely claiming
that Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk called to "lynch" transgenders. Charlie Kirk had
been scheduled to speak at the University of California Davis on Tuesday when Sacramento Bee
opinion writer Hannah Holzer called the activist "another fascist" and said that he wanted to lynch
transgender people.
The
Democrat-Media Insurrection Myth. The storyline put together by what passes for our
news media is that Trump led an armed insurrection on Jan. 6, 2021 that necessitated a
House Committee investigation of what happened that day (actually for the political motive to
recommend Trump for an indictment in advance of the 2024 election). The media's job, including
CNN, MSNBC, and most newspapers was to refer confidently to "the Jan. 6 insurrection" as if
that were a settled fact already in the history books. What passes for our news media did
not say that some people believe it was an insurrection and others believe it was only a
riot by some buffoons and then present the facts and let the peasants decide what they thought
about the matter. No, what passes for our news media needed to state the conclusion of that
"investigation" long before it was completed.
They
Are Intolerant, Divisive, And Anti-Liberty — Call Them Leftists, Not
Liberals. Democrats have moved so far to the left in recent years that they should no
longer be called "liberals," unless the true liberals among them start to stand up to the leftists
who have taken over. The term is misleading, giving the impression that Democrats support
individual freedoms and accept people of different viewpoints, when increasingly they do not.
The word "liberal" gives yet more power to those who seek to take more of our liberties.
Right-leaning publications often use the term "liberal" when "leftist" would be better. On
the other hand, left-leaning newspapers such as The Washington Post and The New York Times like to
use the word "liberal" to describe their own illiberal political views. It obfuscates how
Democrats and their media allies have become more extreme, supporting censorship, authoritarianism,
and racial division: Twitter staff who denied conservatives their right to free speech and
eagerly complied with censorship demands from the federal government were described by the Post as
milquetoast "liberal employees." MSNBC says those pushing the tyranny of wokeness are just
naughty-sounding "liberal rascals."
Cable
News Is Riddled With War Profiteers. The problem with cable news is that —
outside of perhaps Tucker Carlson, who seems genuinely committed to exposing truths and has paid
the price for it in the form of the Majority Leader calling for his censorship from the Senate
floor — it's not news. It's state propaganda, by and for the special interests
that have purchased the state. These special interests include big agriculture, big pharma,
and, of course, the private weapons manufacturers that comprise the military-industrial complex.
Trust
the Science: White people driving cars are poisoning POC in LA. When earnest
reporters at the LA Times got ahold of the study, they couldn't wait to dissect the possible racism
contained within. Make the scientific argle-bargle accessible to your everyday white drivers
(aka "THE BAD GUYS") so they would be educated on their transgressions, feel miserable about
themselves, self-flagellate, and change their habits of perpetual vehicular oppression. [Excerpt
omitted for brevity, among other things.] That lad certainly has all the SJW codewords
down. In another column, a second LA Times type waxes on about his drives, how he tries not
to drive, and how guilty he should feel every time he drives.
The actual
insurrection in DC went unpunished. For two years now, we have heard about an insurrection that
everyone knows was bogus. The media deliberately lied in its vain attempt to ruin President
Donald John Trump — one in a series of attempts by the real deniers of election
results. Tucker Carlson's revelation that the Capitol Police incited peaceful protesters has
been dismissed by a media obsessed with lying. The key to Pravda — the Soviet
version of propaganda — was not to get people to believe it, but to get people to stop
following the news. Judging by television ratings in the 21st century, it is working.
It indoctrinates Americans to believe they are powerless and that resistance is futile. So
the lies continue.
Treason of
the Science Journals. At the government level, pandemic preparedness is as much about
protecting critical supply chains as it is about administering medical treatments. What the
COVID-19 pandemic showed is that the flow of information, which may be the single most vital
resource in the supply chain, is utterly broken. In many cases, it was actively undermined by
senior public health officials including the former chief medical adviser to the president,
Dr. Anthony Fauci. New emails released in a congressional probe show that Fauci helped
direct the publication of "The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2," an influential scientific paper
published in Nature Medicine on March 17, 2020, that claimed COVID-19 could not have leaked
from a laboratory. Fauci then cited the paper — in effect quoting himself, since
he coordinated the article behind the scenes and was given final approval before it published —
as if it was an independent source corroborating his assertions that COVID could only have come from a
bat and not from a lab. "There was a study recently that we can make available to you, where a
group of highly qualified evolutionary virologists looked at the sequences there and the sequences in
bats as they evolve," Fauci said at a presidential briefing on April 17, 2020, exactly one month
after "Proximal Origin" was published.
AP
Promotes Unfounded and Non-Evidenced Israeli Claim That Pro Trump Twitter Accounts Are Bots
Attacking DeSantis and Haley. As many major stories have shown in the past few years,
the big battle over human control is taking place on social media platforms as they continue to be
manipulated by government agencies. The Twitter Files released have shown just how extensive
the government manipulation of information has become. The U.S. State Dept, Dept of Homeland
Security, FBI, CIA, DOJ, Defense Dept, and a host of ancillary networked agencies and public-private
partnership all occupy this space. Essentially, it is a fight for control of the public
psyche. In addition to the Twitter Files, stories averse to the interests of the state (Hunter
Biden laptop) and fake stories created in the interest of the state (Trump-Russia) are all manipulated
by the network of intelligence agencies, quasi government actors and the social media platforms.
This is not debated any longer. There is overwhelming evidence of this reality now.
The Death
of Expertise. The "experts" told us that inflation was transitory, that the Green New
Deal would lower energy prices, that trillions in new government spending costs nothing in taxes,
and that Joe Biden's crippling recession reflects economic strength. They told us that free
speech is dangerous; that disinformation governance boards don't promote government propaganda; and
that government agencies' blacklisting of news sites, social media content, and public dissent is
something other than unconstitutional censorship. They told us that border walls don't work,
that skyrocketing illegal immigration is imaginary, that drug-traffickers aren't killing record
numbers of Americans, that illegal aliens cost American taxpayers nothing, and that concern for
border security is racist. They told us that the deadly retreat from Afghanistan was a
humanitarian success; that NATO has a military obligation to defend non-NATO Ukraine; that Russia
blew up its own Nord Stream natural gas pipelines under the Baltic Sea; that fighting a lethal
proxy war with Russia won't increase the likelihood of nuclear conflagration; and that escalating
hostilities with Russia, China, and North Korea won't risk sparking World War III. The "experts"
were wrong again and again, but they held the most fashionable opinions.
CNN
and Election Disinformation. My friend and I sometimes argue about media outlets like
CNN and MSNBC. Why do they spread misinformation?
A. Are they grossly uninformed?
B. Do they know the truth but tell falsehoods anyway?
C. Do they think we are stupid or naïve?
My buddy feels that the media outlets know the truth but lie about it. To me, it is more complicated. The
nice-looking journalists who read the teleprompters are genuinely ignorant. On the other hand, the news producers
probably know the truth but spread misinformation anyway. Producers are the ones who select the topics, construct
the programs, and hire the special analysts.
The
Only Thing Conspiratorial About The Covid Lab-Leak Theory Was Media's Coordinated Dismissal Of
It. This week, Democrat activists posing as journalists were forced to admit a hard
truth millions of Americans have known for years: The outbreak of the Covid-19 virus most likely
came as the result of a lab leak in China. [...] Conservatives, who had considered evidence of a
possible lab leak from the beginning, have seen this routine before and remember well the
coordinated squelching of a dissenting origin theory. We know exactly how these same
self-professed truth-seekers went out of their way to accuse anyone who considered the possibility
that Covid leaked out of a Chinese lab of promoting a "debunked" "conspiracy theory." "This
question about the Wuhan lab — we know it's been debunked, that this virus was man-made
or modified or anything like that," then-MSNBC host Kasie Hunt previously said. "The Wuhan Lab Leak
Hypothesis Is A Conspiracy Theory, Not Science," a June 2021 headline from Forbes reads.
Other outlets that attempted to dismiss the theory include NPR, Rolling Stone, Foreign Policy, CNN,
NBC, and The New York Times, just to name a few.
Former
Reuters science reporter: The media is lying about CO2 and a "climate crisis". This
corruption of news reporting into narrative journalism has been apparent for years to
climate-hysteria skeptics. Until recently, however, that revolution-by-evolution process
hadn't become apparent to most of the rest of the populace. Now, however, with all sorts of
new data coming out about masks and natural immunity in the COVID pandemic, many more people have
seen The Science exposed as based entirely on political agenda. The mainstream-media refusal
to cover new and conclusive meta-analyses of scientific studies that refute their three-year
narratives in support of government emergency rule now demonstrates that corruption on a much
broader scale.
Habitual
liars: Democrats and the media blame Trump for Ohio train carnage. A disastrous chemical spill occurs in
East Palestine, Ohio, and Biden and Mayor Pete don't say a word or visit for weeks. Shouldn't the media stop
pretending that Biden is empathetic? (Had the event involved a firearm, you know they would have been on site in
less than 24 hours to exploit the tragedy as a means to a political end.) After three weeks, President Trump
shows up and the media goes into protection mode, blaming him for the carnage, asserting his "deregulations" were
to blame[,] even though his rule-cutting had nothing to do with the cause of the wreck. Yet, even if Trump's
policies were to blame, wouldn't that be all the more reason for Biden and Mayor Pete to go? I mean, they sure
love to blame Trump for everything. If Trump actually undid crucial safety regulations, shouldn't Biden and Mayor
Pete have reinstated the measures? [A recent] article in Politico shows the deplorable priorities of a
significant majority of journalists. They clearly care more about covering up for Biden's incompetence and
inaction than they do about the people suffering from the chemical spill.
America Is Becoming a Corrupt
Country. Hillary Clinton deleted 33,000 emails and had her staff literally take a hammer to destroy a hard
drive. Who are we to question the purity of her intentions? The FBI has been corrupted at the top and lied
about Donald Trump as candidate and president. The great American newspapers published these lies — and
won Pulitzers for it. Now, it's clear their journalists were either duped or knowingly dishonest. Yet, they
still have the Pulitzers. Fifty-one intelligence officials signed a dishonest letter just before the 2020
elections discrediting the Hunter Biden laptop and claiming it was probably a Russian hoax. So what?
This steady drift toward dishonesty and toleration of blatant open hypocrisy is a cancer at the heart of American culture.
Are Helicopters Racist?
I call your attention to [...] the Los Angeles Times, more particularly a story that ran in the paper's Sunday print
edition but appeared online Friday evening. Los Angeles Police Department and County Sheriff's Department
helicopters fly lower over black neighborhoods than others, we are told, causing all manner of misery for those living
below. Left unsaid but implicit in the article is that the only possible explanation for this is racism among the
people flying the noisy whirlybirds. The article is truly a shining example of agenda-driven journalism, in which
the reporter, Jeong Park, had to ignore every last bit of relevant information regarding both air traffic control and
crime in South Los Angeles so as to assign malign intent among the airborne cops and bring this embarrassment to
print. He even linked to an FAA document he apparently believed supported the argument, but which in fact
undercuts it. The piece's many deficiencies have been brought to the attention of several editors at the paper,
yet as of this writing it remains online and uncorrected.
Truth in Government.
Whether it is the mainstream media, the social media giants, academia, Hollywood, or corporate America, these
institutions lie about everything. They lie that climate change is a mortal threat to civilization. It's
not. In fact, there has been zero warming for the last eight years. Has the media reported that? They
lie that gun violence is out of control. It is not. Americans are safer from guns 2023 more so than at any
time in our history. Your chances of being killed by a gun is lower by orders of magnitude less than your chances
of getting hit by lightning. They lie about abortion involving women's health when it is really the murder of
children in the womb. They lie that the nation has secure borders as millions illegally enter our country
including terrorists and drug runners. They lie that the rich pay no taxes despite the U.S. having the most
regressive tax regime in the world where our richest citizens pay a disproportionate percentage of the nation's
taxes. They even lie about basic biology, exploiting the sad plight of victims of gender dysphoria. In
recent years there has been a 4000% increase in young females claiming to be the opposite sex. Is no one in
our vaunted institutions — academia or the media — interested in how this could be
happening? They lie about the police being murderous brutes when the truth is that overwhelmingly the police are
honest, brave, and fair public servants doing a thankless job to keep our citizenry safe from criminals. Americans
need to demand truth from all our institutions.
Poll:
Half Say Media Intend to Mislead, Misinform Public. Fifty percent of Americans say the national media
intend to mislead, misinform, and persuade the public, as just 35 percent say most news organizations could be
relied upon, a Gallup and Knight Foundation poll found Tuesday. While 50 percent say the national media tried
to push a false narrative, only 25 percent say the national media do not intend to mislead, misinform, or
persuade the public. Twenty-three percent neither agreed nor disagreed.
Canadian
Broadcast Corporation: 'Freedom' is a Far-Right Rallying Cry. I find myself at a loss for words after
reading an article from the Canadian Broadcast Corporation (CBC) on how the word "freedom" has become a "far-right"
buzzword. After pondering and deliberating and contemplating and a lot of other synonyms for "thinking" I found in
the thesaurus, I eventually decided the best approach to this topic is an honest one. This is the craziest,
crazy-pants article from Crazytown I've ever read. [...] The premise? The word "freedom" has become a dangerous
"rallying cry" for right wingers in the Great White North, and, presumably, beyond.
Panel
that awarded Pulitzers for Russiagate stories mum after scathing exposé on reporting failures. The
panel that awarded Pulitzer Prizes to the New York Times and Washington Post for reporting related to the discredited
Trump-Russia collusion narrative has gone mum as it faces new scrutiny following publication of a four-part series in
the Columbia Journalism Review (CJR) documenting the establishment media pillars' lapses from their claimed journalistic
standards. The 19-member Pulitzer Prize board for 2017-2018 was comprised of various journalists, professors and
writers, including several current or former staff members of the New York Times or Washington Post. Just The News
reached out to 13 members of the panel to find out if the CJR exposé had prompted second thoughts about the
Russiagate prizes. Neil Brown, president of the Poynter Institute had an auto reply set, saying he was out of the
office, while Steve Coll, former dean of Columbia Journalism School, had an auto-reply saying he is on sabbatical.
None of the other board members replied.
It
is no wonder the media has lost the trust of the people. No matter how many false predictions the UN,
Biden, Kerry, Gore, and others make about natural resources causing an existential threat of climate change, the media
just repeats the false predictions and calls it settled science. People who tell the truth that the climate has
always changed cyclically and naturally are falsely called climate change deniers to shut them up. These false
predictions are greatly harming the poor and middle class, but the subjective and biased media clearly doesn't
care. The media claims they care about laws and corruption, but they campaign for corrupt, career criminals like
the Bidens and the Clintons. The media claims that no one is above the law and the Justice Department is now an
independent agency that doesn't care about political affiliation. That is the biggest lie of all. [...]
Journalists who believe it is their job to push a political agenda instead of reporting objectively and factually is a
much dangerous threat to our survival as a great country than anyone who challenges elections.
The
Supreme Court Is At The Heart Of America's Racial Division. If you are trying to make sense of how our
nation has become so toxic, a good starting point is the Supreme Court's 1964 decision in New York Times
v. Sullivan. That case radically altered existing law so that, for the first time in our history, it was
impossible for any "public figure" to bring a successful defamation suit. [...] Since the 1960s, progressives have been
using the race card to demonize and defame their ideological opponents. In that vein, it would be hard to imagine
a more classically defamatory article than that penned the other day by Renée Graham, an associate editor of the
Boston Globe: "Ron DeSantis's Fear of American History." Graham outrageously slanders DeSantis by claiming
that racism motivated him. She compares DeSantis's refusal to allow the wildly ideological African American
Studies AP Course to be taught in Florida to the actions of a slave owner who refused to allow his slaves to learn to
read. It is, she says, an act of "white supremacy." Graham paints DeSantis as an evil and immoral
person. This relieves her of the burden of addressing the substance of the DeSantis Administration's complaints
about the College Board course. It is enough that she labels him a racist and white supremacist.
Straight
Talk on the Latest Riots. Riots broke out in Memphis and are rapidly spreading through the usual urban
areas. The purported rationale is the horrific beating to death in Memphis of Tyre Nichols captured on video and
released by the police. As Glenn Reynolds (Instapundit) observes, Nichols' beating was administered by "Black
officers in a majority Black city with a Black police chief." The officers involved have been criminally charged,
but the media to which every Black killed by a cop is just proof that we are still in the Selma, Alabama world of
decades ago — another case of some innocent Black person victimized by racist oppressors. The odious
Joy Reid at MSNBC highlighted a guest who blames Nichols' death on "white supremacy" and CNN's Van Jones opined "The
police who killed Tyre Nichols were Black. But they still may have been driven by racism."
Move Over, Jayson Blair:
Meet Hamilton 68, the New King of Media Fraud. Ambitious media frauds Stephen Glass and Jayson Blair
crippled the reputations of the New Republic and New York Times, respectively, by slipping years of
invented news stories into their pages. Thanks to the Twitter Files, we can welcome a new member to their infamous
club: Hamilton 68. If one goes by volume alone, this oft-cited neoliberal think-tank that spawned
hundreds of fraudulent headlines and TV news segments may go down as the single greatest case of media fabulism in
American history. Virtually every major news organization in America is implicated, including NBC, CBS, ABC, PBS,
CNN, MSNBC, The New York Times and the Washington Post. Mother Jones alone did at least
14 stories pegged to the group's "research." Even fact-checking sites like Politifact and
Snopes cited Hamilton 68 as a source.
Media
outlets keep promoting 'forest defenders' and ignoring that they shot a police officer. I really believed
that once the facts of this story came out it would be over. There was some room for questioning the story of what
happened in the forest south of Atlanta initially. Police told one story and protesters told another.
According to police, they entered the forest to clear out protesters who are trespassing and preventing construction of
an approved project. They found one man under a tent. They asked him to come out and instead he fired a gun
and hit a Georgia State Trooper in the abdomen. The trooper was taken to a hospital for emergency surgery.
The protester who fired the shot was killed by police. The alternative story pushed by protesters and their
supporters is that the victim had been unarmed and "murdered" by police. The trooper who was shot? They
strongly suggested he might have been hit by friendly fire. Since then the official police version of events has
been confirmed by evidence and the protesters' version has fallen apart.
Antagonizing
the Scapegoats. [Scroll down] [I]n view of the press' oft-repeated rush to smear its chosen
targets, sinister suspicions suggest themselves. The maudlin interviewer weepily bearing witness to the moving
testimony of Jussie Smollett; the glum commentators endlessly recycling the "fine people" hoax; the monotonous chorus
solemnly commemorating the all-but-sacred martyrdom of petty thugs like Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown; the casual
assignment of guilt by accusation (to police officers, the Covington school kids, Kyle Rittenhouse) — all
this arouses our suspicion. Even when these obscene abuses of the public trust are exposed, there is no retraction
or apology; the brazen liars simply soldier on. Perhaps no institution is more conspicuous in its utter moral
failure than the contemporary American print, broadcast, and online media. [...] Contemporary journalists are, as a
general rule, embarrassingly unimpressive, poorly educated, self-promoting hacks having no understanding of (or loyalty
to) the American heritage (a phrase from which many would probably recoil as a "racist dog whistle"). Journalists
represent the worst the American university system has to offer a society its brainwashed graduates routinely
degrade. Any truth a media activist deems detrimental (like the Twitter files) is buried. Any lie deemed
serviceable — no matter how dubious the source or implausible the claim — is amplified and
promoted. Every cherished falsehood is blared at the public until it's exposed, then the activist simply trumpets
the next serviceable lie (e.g. "Russia Collusion," "hands up, don't shoot," and so on).
Media
Claims 'Largely Peaceful Protest' in Atlanta, Mayor Quickly Demolishes That. Saturday night brought
rioting by Antifa people attacking police targets in Atlanta. Now, the night started with a protest against the
police, in the memory of one of their comrades, Manuel Teran. Teran had been shot and killed by the police after
he allegedly shot a cop, when police came to clear protesters out of an area they had been occupying where the city is
constructing a police training center. The radicals have had several people, in multiple incidents, arrested for
domestic terrorism at the site, including for throwing Molotov cocktails at the police.
Who
You Gonna Call (When the Cops Aren't Allowed to Help You)? [Scroll down] If you need further
evidence that the [Los Angeles] Times story is an advocacy piece, read no further than the first person
quoted. It is Patrisse Cullors, a cousin of Anderson and, though it goes unmentioned in the story, a major
beneficiary of the BLM real estate windfall. "There is no reason why law enforcement should be the first responders at
traffic stops or accidents," Cullors said. There are actually many reasons they should, but the reporter
apparently wasn't up to the task of challenging Cullors. Next comes the canard inevitably raised in stories like
this. Activists argue, says the Times, "that communities of color have historically borne the brunt of such
enforcement." Put aside the fact that in Los Angeles, as in every other city, "communities of color" are those
where crime is highest.
What
Is the NOTAM? Flights Grounded Across U.S. After Major System Outage. All flights have been grounded and
paused across the U.S. early this morning until 9 a.m. EST after the Federal Aviation Administration's NOTAM
(notice to air missions) system failed, causing travel chaos across the country. The FAA asked in a statement for
time "to allow the agency to validate the integrity of flight and safety information." The FAA has said it systems
was coming back online but that the NOTAM systems was still being restored.
The Editor says...
A NOTAM is a notice to airmen, not a notice to air missions.
Reluctant correction: The definition
of NOTAM was apparently changed 12/2/2021 to be more politically correct.
Here's
the Problem With Mike Rogers 'Lunging' at Matt Gaetz on the House Floor. In the midst of the battle over
Kevin McCarthy becoming Speaker of the House, Rep. Mike Rogers set newsrooms ablaze by "lunging" at Rep. Matt
Gaetz. At the time, Gaetz and others had just finished securing major concessions from McCarthy, and one ballot
later, the deal would finally be sealed. On the prior ballot, though, Rogers, who is set to chair the Armed
Services Committee, was apparently angered by Gaetz voting present and chose to lash out. Because Gaetz was on the
receiving end of the rage, the press largely took Rogers' side, exuding a "serves him right" attitude about the
ordeal. That's not a shock given the press will take the side of essentially anyone who opposes someone they
themselves oppose.
2022,
Perhaps the Apex Year for an Era of Pretending. In an era of great pretending, when you speak factual and
pain truth, people thirsting will come for the sanity. Yes, there's only so much hypocritical nuttery that can
possibly fit into the social fabric of a nation, and we're full. I see that dynamic starting to play out
now. Mainstream media are openly mocked everywhere for being the Baghdad Bob's they are. The MSM credibility
and influence essentially destroyed by the Potemkin villages and Eco-chambers they built around themselves. The
congressional J6 committee is yet another example of a proclaimed thermonuclear ICBM missile that ended up delivering a
contrasting reality. The fading whistle & pop akin to a dysfunctional bottle rocket.
Why
you can't trust 'the science' about anything anymore. To those who still care about science as a process
that uses honest data to produce replicable results, the last couple of decades has been disheartening when it comes to
everything from so-called "Anthropogenic Climate Change," to COVID's origins and treatments, to so-called
"transgenderism." Still, we consoled ourselves that there were certain things so cut-and-dried that they could not
yield to politics. For example, how certain diseases affect men and women differently. A monkeypox study in
The Lancet blows even that faint hope to smithereens. There is something bizarre about a Lancet article entitled
"Human monkeypox virus infection in women and non-binary individuals during the 2022 outbreaks: a global case
series." It had all the earmarks of a reputable study. [...] The fact that it referred to non-binary individuals
was a bit concerning, but the casual reader would assume that the article focused on biological women, no matter what
they claimed to be. After all, we've long known that diseases affect men and women differently, including the fact
that men and women perceive the onset of a heart attack in very different ways. That makes sense, given that men
and women have different organs, bone structures, and hormones. The devil, as always, is in the details. It
turns out that almost half of the "women" involved in this study about monkeypox in women... were men.
Keystone
Pipeline Allowed to Reopen, Media Continues Lying about Spill. The Keystone Pipeline runs from Alberta to
Houston, almost in a straight line south down "Tornado Alley" in America's midwest, running from North Dakota to
Texas. The overall pipeline is 2,687 miles long, is owned by TC Energy, and carries 860,000 barrels of
oil per day through its 30 inch diameter tubes. The current price of oil per barrel is roughly $80. So
the pipeline is moving roughly $68.8 million worth of oil through its pipeline every day, or $25.1 billion per
year. The pipeline shut down on December 7th after a spill of 14,000 barrels of oil in rural North
Kansas. The Calgary, Canada-based company received permission from the Biden administration on Friday to reopen
the pipeline, though it did not give a definitive date when it would restart.
A Life
Beyond the State. According to one estimate, the average American adult, whether on the right or the left,
spends almost 12 hours a day watching and listening to media, much of it news and political commentary. This
interaction with media is largely a one-way street. Viewers are not engaged in active discussion or thought; they
are told what to think, even as they are encouraged to "like" and "follow." With most media, such as the mainstream
news channels or morning shows, they are harangued by anchors who raise their voices, lift their eyebrows, and employ
all sorts of other gestures and expressions to end the discussion even as they read the "news." Viewers are made to
feel that they are ignorant or immoral if they dare to disagree. This has certainly been the case from the
beginning with reporting on COVID, when liberal media endorsed the Chinese lie that the disease originated in a "wet
market" and followed up with a string of justifications for lockdowns and restrictions, including long-term school
closures. As with everything else, liberal media served as the handmaiden of the State. This dependence on
media is deadly for the life of democracy.
The
'Twitter Files' are the final nail in the media's credibility. The vicious and coordinated attacks by
mainstream news figures against independent journalist Matt Taibbi in recent days reinforce an essential point about the
American news media: they think we are all drooling idiots. Their response to Taibbi's release of the Twitter
Files, which details the company's calculated suppression of a major news story in the run-up to the 2020 presidential
election, underscores this exceedingly low estimation of its audience. Outlets like MSNBC and the New York
Times seem to hope the American public is ignorant of the fact that they got every aspect of the Hunter Biden laptop
story wrong from the start. While real journalists tenaciously reported the facts, such as the New York
Post's Miranda Devine , a disinformation machine comprised of Biden campaign officials, intelligence officials,
liberal journalists, and Twitter higher-ups (with the omission of former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, who was strangely left
out of the loop) acted in brazen coordination to suppress the story.
MSM:
Democrats Can't Be Election Deniers. There's always a double standard for the radical left. There's
always a reason why it's "different" when Democrats say something racist, break the law, or question the results of an
election. Case in point: Time magazine published an article claiming that Republicans who dub House
Minority leader-elect Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) an "election denier" are wrong in doing so. There's
no doubt that Jeffries is an election denier. We have the receipts. He is actually one of many Democrats who
have called Donald Trump an illegitimate president. According to Time, the term "election denier" has
become associated with Republicans who say the 2020 election was stolen because they "assert without evidence there was
fraud in 2020 voting." But the author says that calling Jeffries an "election denier" is misleading and "conflates
different issues." The real issue, which goes unsaid in the article, is that Jeffries and others in his party who
have routinely denied the results of presidential elections won by Republicans are Democrats. Since 2000, every
single presidential election won by a Republican has been called "illegitimate" by Democrats.
Leftist
Journo Still Believes Hunter Laptop Is Russian Misinformation and Trump Colluded with Russia. In 2020,
when we first learned about Hunter Biden's "laptop from hell," we all knew it was real. It wasn't until after the
2020 election was over that the mainstream media slowly but surely started to concede the laptop was genuine, but at
least one left-wing journalist still thinks the laptop story is dubious. David Corn, the D.C. bureau chief of
Mother Jones and an MSNBC analyst, apparently still believes that the laptop isn't legit.
The
Media Undertakers Must be Getting Exhausted. Among the stories Twitter actively blocked was that of the
salacious Hunter Biden laptop contents. So shocking was the material on this laptop, so revealing of the
perversity of Hunter and the corruption of Joe Biden, that one post-election survey reports that 16% of persons who
voted for Biden said they would not have had they known of the contents of this laptop. One major newspaper, the
NY Post, did publish a story about it, and several online posters did as well. The most detailed,
should you care to see for yourself what was on the laptop, is [elsew]here. The laptop reveals not only sexual
depravity and illegal drug use, but corruption and influence buying as well. Taibbi reports "Twitter took
extraordinary steps to suppress the story, removing links and posting warnings that it may be 'unsafe'." The only
person it was unsafe for was Joe Biden, the Democrat party's presidential candidate[.] Even then, White House
spokesperson Kayleigh McEnany was locked out of her account for tweeting about it. Several insiders questioned
what was going on and received the untrue defense that the material was removed because it violated the company's
"hacked materials" policy. The laptop was never hacked. It was abandoned by Hunter, then was unlocked while
in the possession of the NY Post, and it and its contents are authentic. At any other time in history
of which I am aware such a scandal would have been front-page news in the weeks preceding an election.
Vicious dogma.
The COVID pandemic is just a flash in the pan when compared to the dogmatic hysteria surrounding most aspects of weather
and climate. When CBS News periodically covered the enormous blanket of snow that recently fell on Buffalo, NY and
environs, they would then immediately jump to coverage of the world climate conference (COP 27) at the Egyptian resort
of Sharm el-Sheikh. The abrupt juxtaposition caused me to burst out laughing. Never once was it mentioned
that the historically significant northeast blizzard happened a month before the beginning of winter, i.e., the
middle of autumn. Just about every news story regarding floods, wildland fires, drops in lake and river levels,
high tides, etc. winds up including "climate change" as a significant component. In this year's political season,
even candidates for city council included climate activism in their proposed agendas. Imagine, local political
hacks saving their constituents from the weather.
McCarthy:
Twitter Disclosures Show Biden Doesn't Want Free Speech, I Wonder What Facebook, Google Are Hiding. On
Friday's broadcast of the Fox News Channel's "Jesse Watters Primetime," House Minority Leader Rep. Kevin McCarthy
(R-CA) reacted to disclosures on Twitter's suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story by saying he thinks the
disclosures are just the tip of the iceberg, he wonders what internal machinations at Facebook and Google have been
hidden, and the disclosures show "why the White House is going after Elon. They do not want him to tell the truth
and they do not want to have free speech."
FTX
scammer gets kid gloves treatment by the media. Sam Bankman-Fried, who often goes by SBF, has been doing a
media tour to rehabilitate his reputation after scamming his customers out of billions of dollars. It's actually
going very well indeed for him. Unsurprisingly so, since his victims were average folks and he spread his
ill-gotten gains around to the media and the Democrat politicians. [...] It really has been remarkable how easily SBF
has been treated. His scam wasn't penny ante — it was large enough to rank among the largest ever
pulled off. In less than 3 years he managed to build an empire, acquire the naming rights to the Miami
Heat stadium, partner with Mercedes Benz, advertise his wares with some of the biggest stars in the world, become the
2nd-largest donor to the Democrats after George Soros, and be lionized by the media as a savior figure.
IRS
Watchdog Destroys Media Claim That Trump Ordered Audits of James Comey and Andrew McCabe. Liberal media
outlets like the New York Times and MSNBC claimed former President Donald Trump ordered audits of former FBI
chiefs James Comey and Andrew McCabe for political payback. According to the Internal Revenue Service's internal
watchdog, that's not true. The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration determined that the IRS randomly
selected Comey and McCabe for audits of their tax returns from 2017 and 2019 as part of a program the IRS uses to refine
its technology, according to a report released Thursday. The watchdog found no evidence of malfeasance on the part
of Trump or any Trump-appointed officials.
Google
Gives Millions To Boost Leftist Disinformation Peddlers Of Legacy Media. Google and its subsidiary YouTube
just gave a $13.2 million grant to the Poynter Institute's International Fact-Checking Network to combat
"misinformation," in the Big Tech sites' "single largest grant in fact-checking" yet and the latest instance of the
medical, political, and media establishments tightening their grip on the free-flowing digital public square. For
years, the world's elites have been trying to recapture the control they lost to the free flow of information on the
internet. They've shelled out millions for celebrities like Prince Harry to slander the First Amendment and
hand-wring about an alleged "disinformation" crisis. They've pressured individual tech companies to ban content,
people, and entire platforms. The Biden administration even tried implementing its own, now-defunct "Ministry of
Truth," all to convince us that freedom of speech and inquiry is somehow dangerous and that the threat can only be
neutralized by "trusted" experts seizing dominance of the information exchange.
Now the Truth Can
Be Told. In focusing on America's rising rates of violent crime leading up to the midterm elections,
Republicans were routinely accused of playing a dirty trick on voters. "We don't really have a common definition of
what crime means," crime-statistics analyst Jeff Asher asserted in an October interview with NPR. Apparently, the
range of activities that constituted a violation of statute made it difficult to discern what voters meant when they
said "crime." And when "crime" wasn't a nebulous concept that eluded the unsophisticated, it was cast as a problem
presided over by Republicans.
Our Lying Idiot
Media Really Is That Dumb. It's not just that the media lies all the time in the service of its cause, but
that its wretches no longer have the skill or even understanding to tell the lies apart from the truth. And so
they simplify matters in the timeless fashion of extremists by declaring everything they believe to be the truth and
everything that they disagree with to be a lie. Or disinformation. Faced with Hunter Biden's laptop, they
phone up a few experts from their contact list who tell them what they want to hear and the media proclaims it's Russian
disinformation. Faced with actual Russian disinformation accusing Trump of frolicking with prostitutes in Moscow,
they cheerfully amplify it as loudly as they can. And they are too dumb to even know any better. Like their
old Pravda predecessors in Moscow, they don't know anything except the party line.
NPR
says bombs in Israel are "rare." They aren't, but the truth doesn't serve their narrative. These are not
"rare" events. There are an average of more than one pipe bomb every day this year. If NPR was doing its
job, it would have known this information and reported on it way before deadly bombs exploded in Jerusalem. And it
is pretty obvious that the "rare" statement was meant to downplay Palestinian terror, and to avoid mentioning that this
has been the bloodiest year for Israelis since 2015, and second deadliest since 2009.
FTX
now right-wing according to Forbes. I kid you not. FTX — the crypto-fraud firm that just
collapsed — is the brainchild of Sam Bankman-Fried, the second largest Democrat donor in the country.
He helped find Joe Biden's campaign, contributing more than any other than our old friend George Soros. He spent
$40 million on Democrats, and promised them $1 billion to help win the 2024 presidential campaign. [...] What is
hilarious about this — actually there are many things hilarious about this — is that FTX is
actually a darling of Forbes Magazine, who helped it vault to the top of the crypto world. Forbes hyped the
company, hyped Sam Bankman-Fried as a genius, and along with the New York Times turned SBF into a hero, genius
inventor. To the extent that Caroline the fraud was enabled, Forbes, Fortune Magazine, and the New York Times were
the chief enablers.
Yesterday's conspiracy theories
are today's legacy media news reports. [Thread reader] NBC Bay Area reporter @BigadShaban reported on
the Pelosi attack based on source who saw body cam footage. It was almost identical to what Miguel Almaguer said
11/4 that got him suspended. DA says Pelosi will "need to explain... why he did what he did" [...] WashPost
reports after all that "secret docs!" drama, Trump raid produced basically nothing of interest. [...] NBC reports the
January 6 committee will ignore "law enforcement failures" in final report, instead making it all about Trump.
[...] NYT reports the #2 man in the Oath Keepers, Greg McWhirter, was actually an FBI informant, talking to them
for months ahead of the Capitol attack. Oh the day he was supposed to testify in the Rhodes trial, McWhirter, 40,
had a heart attack & couldn't. [...] If you said any of this — about January 6 and the FBI, Paul Pelosi, the Trump raid,
SBF's virtue signaling — you would have been accused of being a conspiracy theorist. And now, in the post-midterms
news cycle... they are all just true. Period.
Progressive
'Journalists' Claim Georgia Is Limiting Voting to Celebrate Robert E. Lee. [Scroll down] In fact,
Stacey Abrams, the Voting Rights Maven™, voted for the law about which these people are complaining. As of
this writing, none of the aforementioned media activists have bothered to correct their original tweets with the correct
information. Why not? Because they are not journalists, they are activists. Their aim is to influence,
not inform. Sure, we expect authentic reporters to make mistakes from time to time. But one of the signs
that an individual in the media is trying to practice journalism is how they respond when they mess up. In
this case, these folks didn't correct their error because the reality is that none of them care about the truth.
Their audience believes Georgia is stopping voting in order to honor a Confederate general, and that is just fine with
them. No wonder trust in the media is at an all-time low.
We
Need To Talk About What Didn't Happen On Election Day. A number of noteworthy things did not happen on
Election Day 2022. Everyone knows the red wave didn't happen. But that isn't all that didn't happen. The
chaos at the polls that was going to be caused by the presence of citizen poll watchers did not happen. Despite
being hysterically predicted (hoped for?) over the past 18 months by reporters who wrote the same story with some
version of the same headline [...] Every story breathlessly claimed that having citizen observers engaged in the
election process was a "threat to democracy," with NBC News warning in early November, "Election officials are bracing
for conspiracy-fueled threats — while still hoping for the best..." The Biden administration did its part
to sow seeds of dissension by launching in June 2021 a national hotline at the FBI for reporting "threats to election
officials and workers," creating a task force to address "threats against election workers." But nary a word from
Attorney General Merrick Garland about protecting poll watchers, even though federal law makes it a crime to injure,
intimidate, or interfere with poll watchers. Every training conducted by those of us doing such training included
instruction about behavior, and that they must be "Peaceful. Lawful. Honest." Yet, without evidence, the
closer we got to Election Day, the more hysterical the headlines became, warning of violence at the polls resulting from
too many observers watching the process.
Voter
Suppression: ABC, CBS Cast Doubt on Midterms, Blaming Violent Right-Wingers. On Monday morning ahead of
Tuesday's almost certain Republican tsunami at the ballot box, ABC's Good Morning America and CBS Mornings
moved away from a fixation on abortion or vague warnings about the fate of democracy if voters choose incorrectly.
Instead, they engaged in voter suppression by hinting a vote for Republicans could be enabling violent individuals who'd
cause violence and/or cause serious doubts to be raised about our country's future.
Six
Reasons Corporate Media Failed to Frame MAGA for Paul Pelosi Incident. [#5] The media are trying to frame
us for a crime they support — the physical assault of politicians. [Numerous tweets] Do the corporate
media honestly believe we have forgotten how they laughed and made jokes about a Democrat assaulting Sen. Rand Paul
(R-KY)? Do the media honestly believe we have forgotten how after Rep. Steve Scalise was shot by a Democrat
assassin, they dropped the story after 18 hours? Do the media believe we have forgotten how they blamed Trump for
the leftists who caused violence at his rallies or how they ignored the firebombing of countless pregnancy centers, the
SWAT-ing of Republican politicians, and told us Antifa attacks on state capitols were mostly peaceful? And do the
media honestly believe we have forgotten how after the terrorists in Black Lives Matter and Antifa wounded up to 50(!)
Secret Service agents during a 2020 attack on the White House, the corporate media ridiculed Trump over reports of him
being rushed to a secure location?
Could
[Democrat] Politics Be Even More Childish? Within the press, the demise of our political system is a
talking point that must be repeated. Jane Pauley, a longtime media operative for the Democratic Party, has tried
to convince voters "the very future of our democracy" is in the balance in next week's elections. Former
Washington Post columnist Margaret Sullivan wrote last spring that "democracy is at stake" because the Republicans will
lead a coup in 2024 to ensure the GOP presidential nominee is declared the winner of that election. More recently,
MSNBC political analyst and one-time New York Times columnist Anand Giridharadas put the left's madness on full
display. He has decided that the midterms are "a contest between part of the country that believes in continued
and expanded liberal democracy, effort to pursue a more perfect union, and a part of the country that is now attracted
to the idea of fascism in the United States." And of course the New York Times can't help itself. It's
screaming that "many voters" are "frustrated and resigned" because they have "fears" over the "fate of democracy."
If they do, it's because the media, in their constant campaigning for Democrats, have unleashed the torrent of lies.
Left-Wing
Media Insists the Parrot Isn't Dead. It's Just Resting. In a couple of weeks, John Fetterman will be
back home in Braddock, Penn., in his loft apartment, playing with his kids and continuing to recover from what we now
know was a devastating stroke. It's what he should have been doing since he suffered the stroke in May. But
because he and his campaign hid the severity of his condition from the media, his party, and especially his opponent,
Mehmet Oz, it came as a shock to see the 49-year-old giant of a man in such a confused state. Whether it was due
to hubris or simple denial of reality, Fetterman's vulnerabilities were exposed for all to see. That is, everyone
but a certain segment of the left-wing media that is working very hard to tell us that we didn't see what we actually
saw, that Fetterman didn't do that badly.
Seven
Times the Media Lied about 'Disinformation' that was True. Just about every time the mainstream media
tells you that something is "disinformation," it turns out that it's the media that is pushing the lies. Last
week, Just the News put together a list of seven important times that the media told everyone something was
"disinformation," but that later turned out to be true. The list includes:
• Hunter Biden's Laptop
• The origins of COVID-19
• COVID-19 vaccines
• Pelosi's Jan. 6 role and calling in the National Guard
• The mistreatment of Jan. 6 defendants
• Irregularities in the 2020 election
• Critical race theory in schools
UPI
hiding the decline in order to promote climate change agenda. Last week, I ran across a UPI story that
left me scratching my head. Titled "In a surprise, global greenhouse gas emissions seem to be on the decline" by
Daniel J. Graeber, it's purportedly evidence that there's good news on the climate change front. The Joe Biden
Inflation Reduction Act has caused a bunch of people to buy electric cars, and that, along with wind farms and increased
solar capacity, shows we may have turned the corner on climate change, according to data. Except here's the
problem. The data suggests no such thing.
The Mainstream
Media Lied to Me About Conservatives. Looking back, when I was a Democrat, I never personally knew any
Republicans or conservatives yet my entire perception of what they stood for was based on left-leaning media
filtering. I felt that I was being informed when I was being highly misinformed about what an entire political
spectrum generally believes and advocates for. Even more so, as a black man, I bought into the bad-faith political
position that "all Republicans & conservatives are racist".
Democrats
Whistle Past the Graveyard. November is almost upon us, and the consensus among credible election analysts
is that any momentum the Democrats enjoyed this summer has evaporated. Despite implausible claims about the
ephemeral "Dobbs effect," the election was always destined to be about inflation, crime, immigration, and
President Joe Biden's job performance — all issues that favor Republicans. Yet the Democrats and the
corporate media continue to engage in magical thinking about the midterms. Their latest fantasy involves an
all-but-extinct creature known as the "split-ticket voter." After telling us for years that political polarization
has rendered such voters very rare, publications such as the Washington Post have suddenly decided that they
could be pivotal this year in several key battleground states. Oddly enough, a number of corporate media outlets
have simultaneously come to the same conclusion.
Using
a "fact check" to deceive. "Fact checks" are almost always intended to deceive or distract you.
During the Trump Administration, every "fact checker" in America needed you to know that every bit of hyperbole Donald
Trump spewed out was a "lie," not an intentional exaggeration for effect and that the Babylon Bee was not a credible
news source. Fact checks, in other words, are about spinning you. Misleading you. Burning up straw men
and then declaring victory.
Leftist
Newspaper Lies about First-Trimester Abortion. The leftist publication The Guardian published
images of gestational tissue from the first nine weeks of pregnancy and misleadingly called it an embryo. An
article titled "What a pregnancy actually looks like before 10 weeks — in pictures," featured eight photos of
the gestational sac, implying that it was an embryo, even though the embryo was removed during the abortion. "Each of
the images in the article shows a gestational sac but clearly the embryonic and fetal human beings have been removed
from the images," OB-GYN Christina Francis told the Daily Caller.
Democrats
take 'fake news' to new lows. Democrats are expanding their misinformation campaign, devising new avenues
to promote a false narrative. In a stunning revelation, The Washington Examiner reported that over the course of
the last year, Democrats have launched fake "local media outlets" to swing elections in favor of their candidates. [...]
They've stooped to literal fake news outlets to promote themselves, which some might consider election interference, all
while they lecture the public about the threat of Republicans and continue with the January 6 theatrical
performance. WaPo — which seeks to elect Democrats and push the leftist agenda everyday —
complains about newspapers who push a partisan agenda. They hilariously act like they are unbiased. Yet, the
WaPo and the NYT both won Pulitzers for peddling lies about Russia collusion for years. How many times does
the media have to see the absolute corruption and partisanship of the FBI as they target Trump and other Republicans
with fictional crimes, while protecting criminals like Hillary and Biden, before they tell the public the truth instead
of pretending that they are apolitical and that no one is above the law?
Huge
percentage of Americans have 'no trust' in newspapers, TV, radio. According to Gallup, nearly 4 in 10
Americans (38%) have "no trust" in America's media, including newspapers, TV and radio. The political divide is
stark. Only 14% of Republicans and 27% of independents trust the media, but 70% of Democrats, whose agenda largely
has been adopted by reporters and publishers, trust the media. Overall, 34% of respondents trust the mass media to
report the news "fully, accurately and fairly." But "Just 7% of Americans have 'a great deal' of trust and
confidence in the media, and 27% have 'a fair amount,'" the poll said. At the other end of the scale, 28% say they
do not have very much confidence and 38% say they have "none at all."
Reuters
"fact check:" We never said the vaccines would prevent anything. There has been a considerable amount
of understandable buzz and unrest making the rounds since a Pfizer executive was forced to admit to a European Union
conference that they never tested their COVID vaccine to see if it would actually prevent infections or halt the
transmission of the virus prior to it being rushed onto the market and mandated almost universally. This has left
many health officials and elected officials with pie on their faces and vocal sectors of the public demanding
answers. Stepping into the breach to quell the uproar this weekend is Reuters, publishing yet another one of their
infamous "fact checks" to clear the matter up.
Hours
Before Decrying 'Horrifying Images,' Mayorkas Was Told CBP Agents Did Not Whip Haitian Migrants. You may
recall an incident last year in which Leftists from Biden, all the way down to your neighbor with the "In This House We
Believe" sign became absolutely apoplectic over the cruel and sadistic border agents riding down Haitian immigrants and
whipping them. Whipping them, I say! Comparisons were even made to antebellum slavery as the Left worked itself
into a full-on foaming-at-the-mouth rage. Except, of course, that wasn't the case. The agents were using the
reins to control the horses and no immigrants were harmed. There even were pictures of immigrant children petting
the horses. The truth eventually came out and of course was largely ignored by the media, Democrat politicians,
and your neighbor. But as it turned out, the government knew that the allegations were false, but decided to let
the narrative take its course.
Ukraine
and the Malevolent Legacy of the Obama-Biden Administration. During the current Ukrainian war, the media
has created a mythology that the Left was tough on Vladimir Putin's Russia. And thus, now it simply continues its
hard-nosed efforts in Ukraine. But nothing could be further from the truth. [...] Indeed, many of America's
current difficulties in Ukraine originate from the Obama-Biden Administration's former disastrous policies toward Russia
birthed between 2009 [and] 2016.
Democrats
Run 50+ 'Local' News Sites in Swing States to Spread 'Fact-Based' Propaganda. Democrats are reportedly
running dozens of "quasi-local" news sites across multiple swing states, producing pro-Democrat and anti-Republican
content under a veneer of non-partisanship. At least 51 of these "local" news sites across 10 swing states are
being run by Local Report Inc., founded last year in Florida, Axios reported. Six writers from "progressive"
Washington-based The American Independent have also contributed to most or even all of the websites, according to
Axios. Many of their articles appear exclusively on the news sites, although the sites aggregate content from
other sources as well.
Dem
Operatives Behind Network Of Fake News Pop-Up Sites In Battleground States: Report. Democratic operatives
are flooding battleground states with more than 50 supposedly local media outlets that are really designed to promote
liberal candidates, according to a bombshell investigation by Axios. One man linked to the scheme is David Brock,
the one-time conservative journalist who did a 180-degree turn and founded Media Matters For America, the controversial
nonprofit that attacks conservative news sites. Axios' investigative reporters Lachlan Markay and Thomas Wheatley
say the operation uses a "patina of independent local news content designed to put a sheen of original reporting on
partisan messaging." The 51 pop-up sites have names such as the Milwaukee Metro Times, Macomb Digest, Mecklenburg
Herald, and the Tri-City Record, and are aimed at key swing states Arizona, Colorado, Georgia, Michigan, New Hampshire,
Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Wisconsin, according to the report.
Democrats
are operating a series of 51 'fake news' websites pushing left-wing stories in toss-up states. A liberal
political media operation being run out of Washington, D.C., and Florida is pushing left-wing stories in 51 different
fake news outlets in order to influence the outcome of the November midterm elections, it is claimed. The
allegations came in a shocking new investigation from Axios that was published on Thursday. The report alleges
that in the past 12 months, multiple new 'news' website have appeared across the country, all run by a company named
Local Report Inc. They do report a wide variety of stories — but sprinkled throughout are news items pushing
Democrat lawmakers and policies.
Media
Falsely Links Hurricanes to Climate Change. Here Are the Facts. As Florida deals with the cleanup
from Hurricane Ian — which ravaged the state, killed hundreds, and displaced thousands more —
media outlets have peddled the idea that this tragedy is the result of climate change. Some even suggested that
Florida shouldn't get aid because some of its elected officials oppose federal legislation that would pump billions of
dollars into various green initiatives. The New York Times ran a piece headlined "Florida Leaders Rejected Major
Climate Laws. Now They're Seeking Storm Aid." The subheadline read, "Senior Republican politicians in the state
have opposed federal action against global warming, which is making storms like Hurricane Ian more destructive." The
Times report said that while Republicans in the state are requesting aid, they "don't want to discuss the underlying
problem that is making hurricanes more powerful and destructive." What was the cause, according to the Times?
"The burning of fossil fuels." Of course.
Do Republicans Cause Hurricanes?
With the grim inevitability of Greek tragedy, three things always happen when a hurricane makes landfall in the United
States. First, the storm will be touted by the corporate media as evidence that anthropogenic climate change
presents an existential threat to humanity and the planet. Second, anyone who dares question the accuracy of this
claim will be either ignored or denounced as a dangerous anti-science "denier." Third, if the hurricane happens to
hit a state with a GOP governor, he will be blamed for causing any resultant death and destruction. In the case of
Hurricane Ian, all three commenced more than 24 hours before the storm actually arrived in Florida.
The
Media's Coverage of Hurricane Ian Proves They Think You're Stupid. Democrats want to convince you that
they can somehow control the weather and that all we need to do to prevent natural disasters is give them power.
That's either unmitigated hubris coming from Democrats or malicious lies. Maybe both? [Video clip]
'Absolutely
Fake News': Even Liberal Former PM Dismisses 'Fascism' Brewing in Italy Claims. Former liberal Prime
Minister of Italy Matteo Renzi has dismissed alarmist claims in the global media that incoming Prime Minister Giorgia
Meloni is a "danger to democracy", telling CNN "the idea that now there is a risk of fascism in Italy is absolutely fake
news." "Personally, I was against Giorgia Meloni. I'm not her best friend. We grew up together in
politics, but we are, and will be, rivals, always," said Renzi, who served as Prime Minister of Italy for nearly three
years until December 2016, and is the leader of the liberal "Italia Viva" party. "At the same time, I think
[Meloni] is not a danger [to] Italian democracy," Renzi continued. "She is my rival, and we will continue to fight
each other, but the idea that now there is a risk of fascism in Italy is absolutely fake news."
Gavin
Newsom's laughable gripe about conservative media bias. You have to admire the chutzpah of California
Gov. Gavin Newsom, who ludicrously claimed last weekend that Democrats were at a disadvantage because conservative
media controls the story. Really! "These guys are ruthless on the other side. Ruthless on the other
side," Newsom said. "That prime-time lineup by Fox, they are ruthless. They dominate the most important thing in
American politics today, and that's the narrative. Facts become secondary to narrative. They dominate with
illusion. We are getting crushed." It's the ultimate in projection. On story after story, the media
follow Democratic talking points to the letter. Asking for young children not to be taught about sex becomes
"Don't say gay." Crime-ridden Democratic cities? They're not that bad, the press says. As Post
columnist Michael Goodwin pointed out on Sunday, nowhere is this more true than with immigration. The media have
ignored or minimized the flood of illegal migrants, and ask no hard questions on President Biden's open-border policies.
Media midterm games at
border. If you're trying to understand why Democrats are making a comeback in polls despite President
Biden's many failures, look no further than the political firestorm over the crisis at the southern border. The
battle offers a case study of how the media shapes public opinion by magnifying left-wing talking points, ignoring key
facts and distorting conservative criticism.
It's
Time to Stop the Left's 'Fact Check' Scheme. [Scroll down] Both examples above are how the modern
"fact-checking" regime works. They don't like your opinion, so they add "context" that wasn't there in the first
place, then disprove the context they added, knowing you will be flagged and possibly suspended from social media.
It seems impossible, but this is how modern-day fascism has crept into our society. When considering where we have
landed as a society, I always think of the book-burning scene in Indiana Jones. In the scene, Nazi soldiers are
throwing every book they disagree with on a massive fire and celebrating the destruction of opposing opinions.
Modern-day book burning doesn't look as dirty. In my case, two young female "journalists" named Mariah and Kyley
attempted to eliminate my opinion from society, most likely while sipping on a $7 latte in a trendy coffee shop
in Brooklyn.
Miami
Herald Warns That Christian Rhetoric Could 'Mobilize Fringe Mobs'. The Miami Herald has discovered
something about Republican politicians, and boy, is it a problem. You may want to sit down for this one. GOP
politicians who are Christians use scripture in their speeches. [...] I know. You're not really shocked or
appalled, but this information came as news to the Miami Herald's Ana Ceballos, particularly when it comes to
Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-Fla.), who Ceballos' article says is "playing with fire." The reporter goes all the way
back to February to cite a speech DeSantis made at Hillsdale College to make her point.
The
Political Party That's Built On Lies. The Democrats' tower of lies has been constructed with the help of
the media, which outside of a few exceptions, are no longer objective, or even pretend to be, and are instead
propagandists for the party they are loyal to. In just the last six years the media have perpetuated the
stolen-by-Russia 2016 presidential election lie, the Stacey Abrams I'm-the-real-governor-of-Georgia lie, and the lie
that the incriminating information on Hunter Biden's laptop was Russian disinformation. The press also lies about
policies, casting Democrats' ideas in the best light possible, the Republicans' policies in the worst. A recent
and especially egregious example: Both the Democrats and the media have been calling Florida's Parental Rights in
Education law the Don't Say Gay Bill, a gross and intentional mischaracterization intended to vilify and poison.
Rather than promote freedom and prosperity, Democrats' policies enslave and impoverish middle and lower America while at
the same time prop up the leftist ruling class and its cronies. But no one would know this by listening to the
media and their handlers in the party.
Zuckerberg's
Admission Of FBI Meddling In 2020 Election Is Even Bigger Than It Seems. Facebook
founder Mark Zuckerberg's admission last week that the FBI pushed the social media giant to censor
Russian misinformation — and thus the Hunter Biden laptop story, as that's how the
agency and Democrats characterized it — shortly before the November 2020 election is but
a breadcrumb of a bigger scandal: the widespread interference by the FBI in the 2020 presidential
election with the potential that the bureau coordinated its efforts with the Biden campaign.
When asked during a Thursday podcast with Joe Rogan how Facebook handles controversial news, such
as the Hunter Biden laptop story, Zuckerberg stopped his host to provide a backdrop to Facebook's
decision to decrease distribution of the scandal.
FBI
Reportedly Said to 'Routinely' Work with Social Media Companies to Censor 'Threat
Info'. Collusion between government and Big Tech goes deeper than Joe Biden's
incompetence. The FBI reportedly responded to the revelation it pressured Facebook to censor
during the 2020 election by saying that the agency "routinely" works with social media companies to
target "potential threat information." The FBI "cannot ask, or direct, companies to take
action on information received," but does coordinate with "social media providers" to moderate
content, according to an Aug. 26 FBI statement reported by Reclaim The Net. This revelation
comes after multiple efforts by various arms of the Biden administration to increase censorship
leading up to the 2022 midterms. The FBI claimed, according to Reclaim The Net, it "routinely
notifies U.S. private sector entities, including social media providers, of potential threat
information, so that they can decide how to better defend against threats." How many companies
is the federal government working with to censor free speech?
The
Economic News Is All Bad, And The American Public Knows It. Reporters and analysts
are getting used to describing news about the U.S. economy as "mixed." The public, however, knows
it's all bad, because the results of President Joe Biden's economic and energy policies are hitting
Americans right in their pocketbooks. The latest ostensibly good news was Thursday's Bureau
of Economic Analysis report that the second quarter decline in U.S. gross domestic product was a
little less than previously stated: -0.6% instead of -0.9%. That's good only if your definition of
success is slightly slower failure. The reality is that the U.S. economy is in serious decline
and getting worse.
LA
Times columnist blames Trump for crime in California. It's hardly a secret that the
crime rates in California are out of control. We've been talking about this tragic fact here
until we're blue in the face. The critical question that everyone needs to be asking is
"why." How did things get so far out of control? Los Angeles Times columnist Anita Chabria
gamely took a stab at the question on Friday. She first listed the correct collection of
suspects sharing the blame, including permissive, soft-on-crime laws and the permissive,
soft-on-crime officials who enact and enforce those laws. But she then sweeps those answers
away and reveals the real culprit. Clearly, the wave of killings and other crimes in the
state of California is the fault of the Bad Orange Man. Yes, folks, the person who has not
been in office for more than nineteen months and has never lived in the Golden State must be at fault.
Mark
Zuckerberg Admits On Joe Rogan That Facebook Censored The Hunter Laptop Story At The Request Of The
FBI. Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg has revealed that before the New York Post
broke the Hunter Biden laptop story, the social media giant received a warning from the FBI which
prompted Facebook to limit the story's reach on the platform ahead of the 2020 presidential election.
The billionaire tech mogul said the FBI approached Facebook and warned it "be vigilant" before the
New York Post story on the contents in Joe Biden's son's laptop. [Video clip]
Zuckerberg's
Meta going all in in censorship as the midterm election nears. Meta, the corporate
parent of Facebook, has announced its plans to control the flow of information on the site where
most voters get their news. You see, the public has to be protected from "misinformation" and
the omniscient sages of Meta are just the folks to decude what is and isn't worthy of being shared
with the public. [...] I am so old that I remember when the free flow of information was regarded
as key to the democratic process. But the ruling interests in the United States have decided
otherwise, and as long as people default to using Facebook and Twitter for their communications,
they will be sheep, herded by the oligarchs.
Trump-deranged
media races again to tarnish ex-prez via unnamed sources. In the wake of the FBI raid on ex-President Donald
Trump's Mar-a-Lago home, The Washington Post and New York Times are running breathless, anonymously sourced stories
suggesting "grave" Trump misdeeds. Have they learned nothing about crying wolf? "Classified documents relating to
nuclear weapons were among the items FBI agents sought" in the raid, the WaPo reported, revealing nothing about the biases of
its unnamed sources who have full license to distort or even lie — as similar anonymous sources did for years
during the "Russiagate" fiasco.
Media
is back to anonymous, one-source stories on Trump that we can't trust anymore. It feels like old times.
In the wake of the FBI raid on Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago club, the mainstream media are in a feeding frenzy the likes of
which we haven't seen since he exited the White House. The usual suspects, like The New York Times and Washington Post,
which spent the four years of Trump's presidency consistently and spectacularly beclowning themselves, are at it again.
Dare we say that it has "all the hallmarks" of media incompetence? Take The Washington Post: Using its signature
anonymous single-source style, it broke the alleged news that Trump was in possession of documents "related to nuclear
weapons." What exactly does that mean? Honestly, based on Post's coverage of Russiagate, when so many "bombshells"
fizzled when the details emerged, you have to wonder if it's the White House pastry chef's recipe for nuclear chocolate cake.
Stop
calling them 'Asian' grooming gangs. Last week's landmark report into grooming gangs in Telford made for truly
horrifying reading. It revealed that 1,000 mainly white girls had been subjected to horrific sexual abuse by groups of
men of mainly Pakistani heritage since at least the 1980s. Tom Crowther QC, who chaired the Telford inquiry, said that
'the overwhelming theme of the evidence has been the appalling suffering of generations of children caused by the utter
cruelty of those who committed child sexual exploitation'. He then went on to say that the failure of the authorities to
intervene was in part driven by 'a nervousness that investigating concerns against Asian men, in particular, would inflame
racial tensions'. 'Asian' men? This is an odd description of the perpetrators. Crowther pulled almost no
punches in his summing up. But this was definitely one he did pull. The members of the grooming gangs were not
simply 'Asian' — by and large, they were Muslim men of Pakistani heritage.
Pulitzer
Prize Board Stands by Awards Given to NYT, WaPo for Russia Hoax Reports. The Pulitzer Prize Board on Monday
[7/18/2022] announced it is standing by awards given to the New York Times and Washington Post for their
reports on the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax. "In the last three years, the Pulitzer Board has received inquiries,
including from former President Donald Trump, about submissions from The New York Times and The Washington Post on Russian
interference in the U.S. election and its connections to the Trump campaign — submissions that jointly won the
2018 National Reporting prize," the organization's statement reads.
That
10-Year-Old Abortion Story the President Ranted About Gets a Major Update. In the wake of Roe v Wade
being overturned, a viral story about a 10-year-old girl in Ohio being raped, impregnated, and unable to obtain an abortion spread
like wildfire across the political sphere. Major news networks covered it as truth despite the fact that it was a single-sourced
account from an abortion doctor who provided zero corroborating details. The story was then used as proof of how harmful
Republican abortion bans are to the point that even Joe Biden got in on the act. The president used the report to rail against
pro-life laws, proclaiming "imagine being that little girl" while asserting that Ohio forces raped children to give birth.
Of course, not everyone was so gullible.
Gallup
Poll: Trust In News Outlets Hits a Historic Low. The American people's trust in news outlets has hit a
historic low, according to Gallup's annual survey on confidence in major U.S. institutions. It's like they've
discovered that "straight news" isn't their primary goal. Both newspapers and television news have seen another drop in
confidence over the past year, with each losing an average five percent of people who said they had a "great deal" of trust
in such institutions. Gallup has been measuring "confidence in institutions" since 1973, and annually since 1993.
Television news is now considered the second least-trusted institution in America, after Congress, with just 11 percent of
respondents telling Gallup they have "quite a lot" of trust in television news. Newspapers aren't much better at 16 percent.
This Is What Real
Revolution Looks Like. If you listen to the mainstream media you will know that from time to time spontaneous
peaceful protests break out in the nation focused on various social issues. You will also know that Antifa is largely a
fiction of the 'delusional right' and that the real threat to the nation comes from a vast right-wing conspiracy driven by
white supremacists. In short, you will know nothing.
Media
Melt Down over Roe v Wade being overturned. Democrats and the Garbage Media are melting down and doing everything
they can to spew lies and misinformation in the immediate aftermath of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v Wade.
We'll start with Chuck Todd, who claims for the first time in his lifetime the Supreme Court has just taken away a 'right':
[Tweet] Abortion was never a 'right' to begin with! Our true rights come from God and that is what our Constitution
seeks to protect. It was 49 years ago that the Supreme Court wrongly concluded that abortion was a 'right' guaranteed
by the Constitution. The Supreme Court today didn't take away any 'right' to abortion, they pointed out that the 'right'
never existed in the first place. In fact, as Jan Crawford pointed out on CBS, another way of looking at it is that the
right to life was given back to the unborn today, which was taken away 49 years ago: [Tweet]
USA
Today Reporter Resigns After Getting Caught Fabricating 23 Stories. USA Today removed 23 of its articles from
its site after an internal investigation revealed one of its reporters Gabriela Miranda had fabricated sources. "After
receiving an external correction request, USA TODAY audited the reporting work of Gabriela Miranda. The audit revealed
that some individuals quoted were not affiliated with the organizations claimed and appeared to be fabricated. The
existence of other individuals quoted could not be independently verified. In addition, some stories included quotes
that should have been credited to others" USA Today wrote in an editor's note published on its site on Thursday afternoon
[6/16/2022].
USA
Today removed 23 stories from website, other platforms following audit of reporter's work. After receiving an
external correction request, USA TODAY audited the reporting work of Gabriela Miranda. The audit revealed that some
individuals quoted were not affiliated with the organizations claimed and appeared to be fabricated. The existence of
other individuals quoted could not be independently verified. In addition, some stories included quotes that should
have been credited to others. As a result, USA TODAY removed 23 articles from its website and other platforms for not
meeting our editorial standards. The headlines of the articles are listed below. Miranda has resigned as a
reporter for USA TODAY and the USA TODAY Network.
Truth
is now in plain sight. Post-injection death tolls have reached levels that are making it very difficult for the
powers-that-be to keep the lambs sleeping and the vaxx zealots enthused. Thus they are resorting to the oldest,
tried-and-true tricks in the book, particularly the "if you tell a lie enough, it becomes the truth" method. Politifact
wrote the same, regurgitated article on April 6, 2022, declaring that mRNA and viral vector DNA injections are not the cause
of countless sudden deaths in adults and kids. The Poynter Institute, Politifact's parent organization, wrote nearly
the exact same "fact check" article on September 24, 2021. The effort has been persistent, consistent and coordinated
among the monolithic mainstream media since the spring of 2021. Pfizer-owned Reuters wrote a "fact-check" on April 29,
2021 entitled, "No evidence COVID-19 vaccines will cause an 'exponential rise' in deaths." The next day, on April 30,
2021, USA Today wrote a "fact-check" entitled, "COVID-19 vaccines don't cause death, won't decimate world's population."
FactCheck.org got into the mix on March 2, 2022, with an article entitled, "COVID-19 Vaccines Have Prevented Deaths, Contrary
to Misleading Graphic on Social Media."
NYC
man nabbed in subway slashings had just been freed after knife dispute with cops. A Queens man was arrested
over the weekend for two random subway slashings in as many days — crimes he allegedly committed after being
picked up, then let go, for brandishing a knife at cops. Donny Ubiera, 32, stabbed two straphangers — one in
the face and the other in the neck — without provocation in separate incidents Friday and Saturday morning along
the Flushing-to-Midtown No. 7 subway line, the NYPD said in a statement. The accused serial slasher had just gotten out
of jail Thursday — with a single night of "time served" — for allegedly refusing to put down a large
knife when confronted by Queens officers on the street and then trying to flee with it the day before.
The Editor says...
The news media consistently uses the term "random" to conceal black-on-white hate crimes.
The
dystopian state of our nation. What to do? Wake up! Vote! Get involved with an election
integrity project or a precinct project. Fight back. Say no to medical mandates! Vote out the RINOs like
McConnell, Graham, Romney, Cheney, Kinzinger, etc. — all the fake conservatives who just want to be part of the
swamp long enough to get very rich without offending anyone else in that swamp. We know who they are; Trump exposed
them all to the sunlight. Don't believe a word uttered on CNN or MSNBC. Like the networks, their talking heads get
their talking points from the Democrat party, and they never deviate, which is why they sound like mindless mimics.
There is not a critical thinker among them. They might as well all be Kardashian cut-outs. They are all
Alinskyites now.
A friendly reminder that
many gun control groups routinely inflate school shooting numbers. [Threat reader] [Scroll down] Are
these all instances of gun violence? Yes. Are they all problematic in their own right? Yes. But
packaging these as part of some "school shooting" epidemic is dishonest nonsense. [Indeed], they literally count a cop
who shot himself in his own vehicle vaguely near an elementary school. Presumably overnight. In mid-JULY.
We've got a 25-year-old fatally shot [and I quote here] "near a school playground." On a Sunday evening. A
17-year-old fatally shot outside of an elementary school... on Veteran's Day, when school wasn't in session. It doesn't
get less absurd. They include an instance where, after a night game for an adult league flag football league, a man
fatally shot a member of the opposing team because of an on-field dispute... solely because it happened behind an elementary
school. [...] We've got an instance where a stray bullet struck a window of an elementary school while no one was inside the
building. We've got "a couple shots fired near a middle school baseball field on a Friday evening while a 20 year old
and friends were taking batting practice," apparently not directed at anyone associated with the school, and as far as anyone
can tell there were no injuries. There are bullets hitting the outside wall of a middle school gym in the early morning
before anyone was on the campus, likely during an unrelated drive-by shooting.
BBC
accused of altering alleged rape victim's quote to avoid 'misgendering' transgender male attacker. The woke BBC
is being accused of outrageously altering an alleged rape victim's quotes by replacing pronouns to be more inclusive in an
effort to protect her transgender attacker from "misgendering." The Times of London broke the story that the British
media outlet previously quoted a woman who claimed she was raped by a transgender male and then altered her words to be
politically correct. Her quotes were part of a report from 2021 on lesbians who have been "coerced into sex with
transgender women." The story was published on Oct. 26, 2021. It covered a lesbian campaign called "Get
the L Out." Gay women were candidly asked about their sexual relationships with transgender women.
There were
WMDs in Iraq. Despite evidence to the contrary, there is the continued belief that there were no weapons of
mass destruction found in Iraq. Between the Democrats, the media who serve as their propagandist, and those who have an
irrational hatred of George W. Bush, there has been a refusal to give up the lie that nothing was found in Iraq. One of
the reasons given by former President Bush for going into Iraq — beyond Hussein's government funding international
terrorist activities that did target Americans — was weapons of mass destruction were in fact found. In
other words, the weapons were not the only reason, but also the financing of international terrorism. A 'weapon of mass
destruction' is not just nuclear, but other weaponry meant to harm a large number of people through unconventional means.
Daily
Beast releases apology to Hunter Biden's laptop repairman. The Daily Beast has issued an apology to the
Delaware computer repairman who acquired Hunter Biden's laptop for wrongly claiming in a past story that the computer was
"stolen." The apology to John Paul Mac Isaac appeared in a Wednesday [5/25/2022] editor's note attached to a story the
Daily Beast published in Dec. 2020 alleging the laptop was pilfered, Fox News reported. "An earlier version of this
story mistakenly referred to Hunter Biden's laptop as 'stolen.' We have removed that word, and we apologize to
Mr. Mac Isaac for the error," the editor's note reads. Isaac, 45, was left with the infamous laptop after Hunter
Biden abandoned it at his shop in 2019. The repairman came to legally own the laptop after the president's son neglected
to ever pick it up.
Seven
Ways The Texas Tribune Is All-In On Climate Fearmongering. A recent piece in The Texas Tribune lists
seven alleged ways climate change is already impacting the state of Texas and its residents. When not outright false,
the listed claims are extremely misleading. Real-world data indicates the state of Texas faces no severe imminent
threat from climate change. Two writers, María Méndez and Erin Douglas contributed to the article, "Seven
ways climate change is already hitting Texans," which runs the gamut of common alarmist lines. This isn't the first
time Erin Douglas and The Texas Tribune have published false information about the impacts of climate change on Texas.
Man
shot and killed on NYC subway in broad daylight, cops say. A deranged gunman shot and killed a 48-year-old
straphanger aboard a Manhattan subway train Sunday morning in what cops are calling an unprovoked attack. The shooter,
who was still on the loose Sunday afternoon, paced back and forth in the last car of the northbound Q train around 11:42 a.m.
before he opened fire on the random victim seated inside, police and sources said. "Completely random," one police
source said. The victim, whose name wasn't immediately released, was rushed to Bellevue Hospital where he was later
pronounced dead, police said.
The Editor says...
The news media in New York is always very quick to excuse cold-blooded killers as "deranged" and the killings as "totally random" —
especially when the shooter is black and the victim is not, which is almost always the case, and apparently was the case this time. The
newspapers' writers dare not suggest that blacks are racist or that they target white people just because they're white; but if the colors were
reversed, hate crime accusations would fly.
Signs of a False Flag:
1. Asks you to respond emotionally rather than intellectually.
2. Strips the event of context, such as the contemporary factual setting, geopolitical reality, or historical awareness.
3. Demands a rush to judgment before a diligent, independent inquiry occurs.
4. Collectivizes judgment, by taking an individual event, and demands you blame an entire culture, religion, race, ancestry, community or country for it.
5. The only explicable motive offered for the offending action is irrational evil or utterly stupid immorality, as it is against the rational interest of the offender to commit the act for the reasons alleged.
Congrats
To The Media For Finally Finding A White Supremacist. Assuming the gunman who shot up the Buffalo, New York,
grocery store really was motivated by anti-black racism, let's do what the media do when faced with an Islamic terrorist who
goes on a killing spree in America and just refer to him as a "lone wolf," a mentally unstable individual who in no way
reflects any broader phenomenon or trend. Except, unlike with violent Muslim extremism, that characterization in this
case would be true. Despite what the media, Democrats, leftists, and, of course, the permanent Washington bureaucracy
say (over, and over, and over again), there is no imminent, large-scale threat from white nationalists. It doesn't
exist outside of Joe Biden's TelePrompter.
There
was Another Mass Shooting in America. You Didn't Hear About It Because the Suspect is a Chinese
Communist. [Scroll down] The Orange County Sheriff's Department tweeted the known facts about the mass
shooting on Monday. "The Laguna Woods church shooting investigation has continued through the night. Teams
continue to process the scene," the sheriff's department said. "The suspect in the Laguna Woods church shooting has
been identified as David Chou, 68 years old, of Las Vegas, NV," the sheriff's department added. [...] Except there is a
problem with the narrative: The suspect isn't a 'white supremacist.' Nor is he one of the many African-American
assailants who have been charged and convicted for attacking Asian-Americans. The suspect is a Chinese-born man named
David Wenwei Chou, a 68-year-old resident of Las Vegas. His motivation for the mass shooting was described in a
hand-written note in Chinese left on a car dashboard, as was reported by the L.A. Times. "David Wenwei Chou, 68, of Las
Vegas, left notes in Chinese in his car stating he did not believe Taiwan should be independent from China, said Orange
County Sheriff Don Barnes," the Times reported.
A Tale Of Two Mass
Shootings. In the span of one month, there were two mass shootings. Both took place in New York.
Both were racially motivated. Both shooters were violent extremists. But the media tied only one of them to a
mainstream political party. Can you guess why? Immediately after the identity of the alleged Buffalo
shooter — initially charged with one murder and suspected of killing 10 — became known, the chattering
class was insisting that he was not a "lone wolf" and pinned the blame for the massacre on "right-wing extremists" who
"control the Republican party." The Rolling Stone called the 18-year-old Payton Gendron "a mainstream Republican." [...] A
Los Angeles Times op-ed declared that "The Buffalo gunman emerged from a far-right ecosystem that's gone mainstream."
New York Times weighed in with an article headlined: "Replacement Theory, a Fringe Belief Fueled Online, Is Refashioned
by G.O.P."
Guess
how the Buffalo shooter identified himself politically. The alleged supermarket killer is self-described as
authoritarian left — so why isn't this being reported? If the alleged Buffalo killer's "manifesto" is
authentic, he was deep into communist ideology and now is an authoritarian leftist. Why is this being kept under
wraps? The teenager accused of murdering ten people last Saturday in Buffalo, N.Y. also allegedly posted a 180-page
"manifesto" online that the national media are selectively exploiting, leaving out key facts.
Press pumps up Joe Biden.
"History will be kind to me," Winston Churchill said, "because I intend to write it." Britain's great statesman did as
he promised, but Joe Biden has an even sweeter deal. He doesn't need to put pen to paper because a cottage industry of
so-called journalists is already twisting truth to make the failing president a victim, if not a hero. It's as if
somebody in an old newsroom called out, "Sweetheart, get me rewrite," and a thousand scribes raised their hands to volunteer
to make Biden look like something other than the second coming of Jimmy Carter. History, schmistory. No need to
wait — this is fiction on the fly! "What Choice Does Biden Have?" The New Yorker magazine asked, before
answering: "With the impending evisceration of Roe v. Wade, partisanship is the only course for a President in our
broken system." See, the "system" is always "broken" when Democrats don't get their way. Only when they win is
America a real democracy.
The
last people anyone should trust to tell or determine the truth are journalists and government officials. There
are many examples of where the media colluded with the Democrats to intentionally spread misinformation to the public.
Here is a small sample: Democrats in Congress have repeatedly challenged elections where they lost yet they weren't
called treasonous, weren't said to be against democracy, where we didn't have endless hearings, and they weren't
silenced. Obama, Biden, Pelosi, and others repeatedly lied to the public about Obamacare, but the media not only didn't
silence them, but they also supported them. Obama and Hillary concocted a lie about Benghazi, as Americans were killed,
and the media never silenced them. The Obama administration used the media to spread lies to get support for the Iran
deal, yet the media never silenced them. Most of the media still supports the deal that enriched Iran, which continues
to spread terrorism and pledge death to America. The media and others intentionally spread the lie of "Hands up Don't
Shoot" that ginned up racial hate against cops. How many cops have been killed and injured because of that intentional
lie? Yet, no one who spread the lie has been silenced. The media, DNC, the Hillary campaign and government
employees colluded to spread the lie about Russian collusion to destroy Trump and they have not been silenced.
Media
Hoax: No, Kevin McCarthy Did Not Say Trump Should Resign Over J6. There they go again. The left and
NeverTrump infotainment propagandists are busily twisting and spinning their claims that then-House Minority Leader Kevin
McCarthy wanted President Trump to resign after J6. The implication being that he was so personally mortified by the
"insurrection" (that wasn't) that he personally wanted the president to resign as a traitor. Or something.
However, and completely unsurprisingly, if you listen to the audio they are touting as "evidence," you can clearly tell that
he is discussing a particular circumstance: Democrats and NeverTrump Republicans pursuing removal of Trump from office
via the 25th Amendment.
Carter
2.0 — Media Runs Interference for Joe Just Like They Did for Jimmy. Now that Joe Biden's approval
rating has fallen — it's hovering in the low 40s, and it can't get up — the Main Stream Media have come
up with a new line of defense for their man. Okay, goes this new line, Biden isn't doing so well, but that's to be
expected — because no president can do well. That is, the problems are just too tough, the job is
just too hard, the country is just too polarized, yada yada yada. As we shall see, history suggests that the American
people won't buy an argument based on hopelessness, which we can call the desperation defense. After all,
Americans tend to be optimistic and solution-oriented. And so if an elected official can't solve the problem, throw him
out and give someone else a chance. That's the American Way.
Superhero
Obama Fights 'Online Lies'? The New York Times sounded a little giddy on the front page of its "Business"
section April 21 with the headline "Obama Joins Fight to Curb Online Lies." This spin strongly suggests former President
Barack Obama never lies. He's a valiant warrior against lies. That came after a badly disguised press release at
CNN.com on Obama "urgently throwing himself into the fight against disinformation." As usual, they make it sound like a
superhero has landed whenever Obama arrives on the scene. Never mind PolitiFact giving Obama the "Lie of the Year" in
2013 for when he said, "If you like your health care plan, you can keep it." Never mind Obama's baldfaced lies in 2012 that
the Benghazi consulate attack wasn't a terrorist thing; it was a protest of an Islamophobic YouTube video that got out of
hand. As if the Islamic radicals brought grenade launchers to a "protest." This underlines why the liberal media
should not be trusted in a "disinformation" fight. They have a frustrating tendency to put themselves on the side of
"information" and conservatives on the side of "disinformation."
No,
Trump Did Not 'Storm Off the Set' of Piers Morgan's Interview Show. On one level, the claim by media
personality Piers Morgan that Donald Trump "stormed off" the set when he brought up the 2020 presidential election is just
plain creepy. But if the only side of the story you get is from Morgan trying to goose ratings for his new
show — the side the mainstream media wants you to see — Trump comes off as an unhinged maniac.
Deceptive
Edits: Audio Contradicts Piers Morgan, Shows He Warped Trump Interview Ending in Promo. Audio provided by
former President Donald Trump's team to Breitbart News of the end of Trump's interview with Piers Morgan proves that Morgan
and his team deceptively edited the interview to make it appear as though it was a contentious ending when it was not.
A 30-second promotional clip that Morgan released on Wednesday afternoon seemed to show Trump flying off the handle and
walking out mid-interview as a righteous Morgan asked him tough questions about his views on the 2020 election. But the
full story seems to indicate that Morgan's team deceptively edited the clips together to make it as nasty as possible for
Trump — and to drive up the ratings for Morgan's new show. Morgan's new show, Piers Morgan
Uncensored, launches next week on Talk TV, a subsidiary of Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation.
Yes,
the Media Bury the Race of Murderers — If They're Not White. Frank James, the man arrested for
Tuesday's New York City subway shooting, is a black nationalist and outspoken racist who railed against whites, Jews, and
Hispanics. A careful reader of the New York Times could be forgiven for overlooking that. In a nearly
2,000-word article on the attack, James's race is not mentioned. The same is true for the coverage offered up by
Reuters; the Washington Post only mentioned James's race in relation to his condemnation of training programs for
"low-income Black youths." Media critics on the right say that the conspicuous omission of James's race from these news
reports illustrates a trend among prestige papers, which deemphasize or omit the race of non-white criminals while playing up
the race of white offenders. But is it a real pattern? Yes. A Washington Free Beacon review of
hundreds of articles published by major papers over a span of two years finds that papers downplay the race of non-white
offenders, mentioning their race much later in articles than they do for white offenders. These papers are also three
to four times more likely to mention an offender's race at all if he is white, a disparity that grew in the wake of George
Floyd's death in 2020 and the protests that followed.
Ten
Steps to Totalitarianism. Does anybody still think totalitarianism can't happen here? Ask yourself how
many of these steps we've already galloped past. [... #4] Control over Communication: There is a reason Western
governments have begun aggressively attacking free speech as "misinformation" or "disinformation": the power to communicate
ideas to the broader public threatens governments' monopoly over "official" truths. Traditional forms of mass
communication — newspapers, radio broadcasts, and television shows — are operated by so few
corporations that the State has no problem influencing, if not outright controlling, the information disseminated to the
public. In contrast, social media platforms and independent publishing sites permit citizens (in theory) to bypass
State censors, regulators, and other information gatekeepers to communicate directly with large numbers of other
citizens. See why governments spend so much time targeting free speech as "hate speech" or "harmful information" that
must be banned?
The
Chicago Thinker Staged a Media Regime Takedown This Week. This week, the University of Chicago's Institute of
Politics (IOP) and The Atlantic magazine hosted a "Disinformation and the Erosion of Democracy" conference, and we
have to hand it to IOP Director David Axlerod for bringing in true experts on the subject. The conference featured some
of America's greatest purveyors of disinformation, such as Barack Obama, Brian Stelter, Anne Applebaum, and a few token
conservatives, including Jonah Goldberg and Adam Kinzinger. The media, government, and academia elites speaking at the
conference weren't expecting to be challenged as they self-righteously spewed more lies — but our team at the
Chicago Thinker was prepared to hold them accountable. Student journalists from the Chicago Thinker
respectfully listened, asked honest questions, and reported. Our efforts soon went viral, garnering millions of views
on social media. We successfully turned the IOP's "Disinformation Conference" on its head and sparked a national
conversation about the corporate media's disinformation.
Has Biden
become expendable? [Scroll down] Before the 2020 election, a story broke regarding Hunter Biden's laptop,
which was abandoned at John Paul Mac Isaac's Delaware repair shop. Along with reports that Biden's laptop contained
disturbing images of a sexual nature, there were allegations that presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son had
compromising financial dealings with Ukraine worth millions of dollars. Tony Bobulinski, a former business associate of
Hunter, confirmed on Fox's The Tucker Carlson Show that Hunter's troubling emails were legitimate. The New York
Post confirmed the authenticity of the laptop and published articles regarding some of its shady contents. That's when
the formidable socialist propaganda apparatus went into full cover-up mode. The New York Times and Washington Post
dismissed the laptop story. Democrats attacked anyone discussing the laptop and labeled the entire subject a Russian
disinformation scheme. Social media banned The New York Post from sharing the story, and countless bloggers sharing the
story saw their social media accounts suspended. Now, 18 months after Biden became president, the corrupt media have
come out to say Hunter's laptop is genuine.
The
Legacy Media Have Not Conceded the Laptop Reporting — And They Don't Deserve Credit. In the last two
weeks, the New York Times, CNN, and the Washington Post all came forward to admit that the Hunter Biden hard
drive — which I originally reported a year and a half ago in the lead-up to the 2020 election and saw those
outlets dismiss and smear the stories as "baroque mythology," "made up," "Soviet tradecraft," and "disparaging
Biden" — was authentic. However, despite initial admissions, the media are now stopping short of
acknowledging the reporting on the information the hard drive contained — namely, that Joe Biden was a direct
beneficiary of Hunter's deals. Instead, they are inviting the people who come from the very institutions that outright
lied and purposely misrepresented the laptop and its contents in the first place to continue lying and misrepresenting the
laptop and its contents.
The
media lies about Obamacare ... and everything else. Now that Joe Biden's touting Obamacare and bringing
President Obama along for the ride at the White House, the media still acts like Obamacare is great even though Obama and
others continuously lied to get it passed and then lied about the results. It's par for the course because they are
such a dishonest crew. The media also is a great supporter of Obama and Biden as they lied to get the deals done with
Iran which continues to support terrorists and continues to pledge death to America[.] The media acts like it is
treasonous to oppose election results and that no one did it before Trump. Yet they always support Democrats who
challenged results in 2000, 2004, and 2016 in Congress. The media and other Democrats called Trump an illegitimate
president for four years. They impeached him twice for pure garbage. The media and others spread the lie that a
white cop shot Michael Brown when his hands were up, and he was backing away. How many cops have been injured and
killed because of this intentional lie?
A World Gone Mad.
Governments everywhere, including here in the USA, have abandoned God, good government, law and order, common sense, and
traditional Judeo-Christian values. They have jumped in with both feet into the dark and shadow without bothering to
look back at seeing what they have already wrought. [...] The political absurdity and hypocrisy has reached the highest level
I have ever seen. The 3.8% unemployment announced in February is an historic achievement, but the 3.6% unemployment
rate during the Trump years is a crisis.
The
Unanimously Liberal Tilt of the 'Fact Checkers'. Now that the Ketanji Brown Jackson hearings are complete, we
have collected another fascinating exhibit of the leftist tilt of "independent fact checkers." Just try and find a single
fact check on anything Judge Jackson said. Try and find a single evaluation of any statement by a Democratic politician
touting Jackson — from Biden and Dick Durbin on down. Checking liberals and Democrats is apparently not
listed among their job duties. On March 28, White House deputy press secretary Andrew Bates addressed Judge Jackson's
qualifications. Bates claimed what speaks to the strength of her public record "is the multitude of fact-checks from
the press, from retired judges, and from former prosecutors who have dismantled attacks brought by a small group of GOP
senators." "Dismantling" Republican critiques is the job of the Fact Check community? That's what it looks like.
The
Stealing of the Presidency, 2020. The left-wing news media didn't just poison the information environment with
their incessantly negative coverage of President Trump going into the 2020 election. They also refused to give airtime
to important arguments of the Republican campaign — both pro-Trump and anti-Biden — which meant
millions of voters cast their ballots knowing only what the media permitted them to know about the candidates. To
measure the true effect of the media's censorship on the election, the Media Research Center asked The Polling Company to
survey 1,750 Biden voters in seven swing states (Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and
Wisconsin), six of which (all but North Carolina) were called for Biden. We tested these voters' knowledge of eight
news stories — all important topics that our ongoing analysis had shown the liberal news media had failed to cover
properly. We found that a huge majority (82%) of Biden voters were unaware of at least one of these key items, with
five percent saying they were unaware of all eight of the issues we tested. This lack of information proved
crucial: One of every six Biden voters we surveyed (17%) said they would have abandoned the Democratic candidate had
they known the facts about one or more of these news stories. A shift of this magnitude would have changed the outcome
in all six of the swing states won by Joe Biden, and Donald Trump would have comfortably won a second term as president.
Flashback:
MSNBC, CNN, CBS told viewers Hunter Biden laptop story was Russian disinformation. The New York Times last week
confirmed the authenticity of Hunter Biden's missing laptop, a story which was originally dismissed as Russian disinformation
by many liberal media outlets leading up to the 2020 presidential election. Television hosts, guests and journalists
quickly took to the airwaves in October 2020, reassuring viewers that the laptop was "unverifiable," likely tied to the
Kremlin, and the product of a smear campaign orchestrated by former President Trump and his allies. "We start this hour
with the tale of international espionage connected to a close confidante of the President of the United States," MSNBC's Ali
Velshi said on Oct. 17, 2020. "The president was reportedly warned that his personal attorney, former New York City mayor
Rudy Giuliani was the target of a Russian intelligence operation, a story that is unraveling to reveal allegations of
disinformation, dirty tricks and a federal probe over Russian efforts to disparage Joe Biden."
15
Media Personalities Who Have Permanently Damaged Their Reputation by Peddling the Lie That the Hunter Biden Laptop Story Was
the Work of Russian Propagandists:. MSNBC's executive producer Kyle Griffin; Publisher of the Ink Anand
Giridharadas; Daily Beast reporter Wajahat Ali; Managing editor of Truthorfiction.com Brooke Binkowski; NBC News
correspondent Heidi Przybyla; Writer Chip Franklin; MSNBC contributor Ben Rhodes; Washington Post opinion columnist Max Boot;
MSNBC's Naveed Jamali; Mother Jones Publication; CNN anchor and Humpty Dumpty cosplayer Brian Stelter; CNN anchor Wolf
Blitzer; NBC News correspondent Ken Dilanian; MSNBC Morning Joe's regular contributor Dave Aronberg; and CNN anchor Jim
Sciutto. Congratulations to you — dark marks all around! For a little fun, we'll have to run this list
against the list of folks who insisted Trump colluded with Russia (that's for another time).
The
Press Has Lied To Drag The United States Into War Before. Don't Think They Won't Again. When you see
talking heads uncritically parroting propagandist stories about Ukraine that turn out to be false, from the "Ghost of Kyiv"
to that Snake Island story to old photos taken years ago, you should be asking why the corporate media is so willing to
spread such fake news (while it censors conservatives for factual critiques of disproven Covid narratives, no less). It
wouldn't be the first time the press lied to pull Americans into war. [...] George Orwell, who fought alongside Republican
forces, wrote in his memoir "Homage to Catalonia" that "for the first time, I saw newspaper reports which did not bear any
relation to the facts, not even the relationship which is implied in an ordinary lie." "I saw great battles reported
where there had been no fighting, and complete silence where hundreds of men had been killed. I saw troops who had
fought bravely denounced as cowards and traitors, and others who had never seen a shot fired hailed as heroes of imaginary
victories; and I saw newspapers in London retailing these lies and eager intellectuals building emotional superstructures
over events that never happened," he recalled. "I saw, in fact, history being written not in terms of what happened but
of what ought to have happened according to various 'party lines.'"
Liberals,
Conservatives, and Russia: The Drama Triangle. With friends like liberal media, who needs enemies?
Their virtue signaling and political spin over Ukraine is so revolting that if I didn't know better, I'd turn against Ukraine
like so many conservative commentators already have. But having lived in both Russia and Ukraine, I know better.
Just as revolting is seeing previously trusted conservative sites and TV hosts defending Russia and tarring Ukraine.
Children act like that when adults apply reverse psychology. What's their excuse? I'm not naming names because
I'd like to believe they are acting in good faith and are simply misguided by crafty spinners. Reading Russian and
Ukrainian sources in the original, I know exactly who in this war is spinning lies and who is fighting for truth and
freedom. Believe me, not every enemy of the liberal media is our ally or deserves sympathy. Sometimes the enemy
of our enemy is an even bigger enemy.
Tucker
Carlson Revisits the Media People Who Manipulated the Hunter Biden Laptop Story. On his evening broadcast
[3/17/2022] Fox news host Tucker Carlson took a historic look at how the media manipulated the Hunter Biden laptop story in
order to protect Joe Biden as a candidate. These same media personalities claim they are credible, and viciously attack
anyone who points out their lies. The example of the Biden laptop should forever dispatch any credibility they claim to
hold. [Video clip] Not included in the Carlson review, but one of the most transparently biased segments on
the Biden laptop issue, was the interview between CNN disinformation specialist Christiane Amanpour and Liz Harrington.
Given the recent revelations about the authenticity of the Biden laptop, watch this video of Amanpour trying to protect the
regime. [Video clip]
Why
was the Hunter Biden laptop story covered up? It's now a familiar pattern — a sensational news story
is dismissed by serious journalists as bogus fake right-wing agitprop. You'd have to be a swivel-eyed conspiracy
theorist to believe that. You don't want to be one of those. Then, a year or so later, the same important media
organs, the same authorities who made you feel crazy for thinking that the story might be credible, turn around and tell you
that, yep, it was true all along. It was just politically awkward to say so at the time. [...] When the New York
Post reported in October 2020 on Hunter's marvellous laptop — and the potentially incriminating documents on
its hard drive — the New York Times, CNN and others went to great lengths to attack the Post's
reporting: it was, liberals insisted, a Trump-led hit job so therefore not credible. Twitter and Facebook actually
censored the story. There was an election on and almost nobody wanted to be accused of doing anything that might stop
Joe Biden kicking Trump out of the White House. But the Hunter laptop story raises serious concerns about the Biden
family and the role Joe Biden played as Vice President, especially in 2014 when he took the lead on the Ukraine crisis.
It's well-known that Hunter had a ludicrously well paid job at the Ukrainian mining company Burisma, despite having little
qualifications for the role beyond his surname.
Another
Round of Ukraine Hoaxes Discovered? The propaganda out of the Ukraine/Hollywood association is continuing
unabated. In a Twitter video today, pushed by Buzzfeed Journalist Christopher Miller, the claim is, "President Zelensky
walked to a hospital today to visit wounded Ukrainian soldiers and award them with state honors for their sacrifices."
[Tweet] However, alert researchers noted the woman to Zelenskyy's left, in the video, is a physician named Inna
Derusova. She was reported to have died on February 26th. [Tweet] As we said from the outset, do not take
anything at face value. Question everything that is being presented. The level of western propaganda to support
the intents of the U.S./NATO and multinational community are extreme.
Media Outlets Continue To Portray
Pro-Biden Lincoln Project as 'Republican' Organization. The Lincoln Project is a scandal-plagued super PAC
dedicated to supporting President Joe Biden and helping Democrats win elections. In October 2021, for example, Lincoln
Project operatives dressed as neo-Nazis crashed a Glenn Youngkin campaign event in a misguided effort to besmirch the
Republican candidate for governor of Virginia. (It didn't work.) Nevertheless, mainstream media outlets continue to
portray the Lincoln Project and its senior members as "Republicans" or "right-of-center" pundits whose opinions actually
matter, or are substantively different from those of a generic liberal pundit. (They aren't; they don't; they aren't.)
Last month, the Hill published an article about how "Republicans are reveling in their hatred of Joe Biden." It
includes several quotes from Lincoln Project adviser Stuart Stevens, who is described as a "prominent GOP consultant."
Stevens, who wrote a book renouncing his former party, does not even consider himself a Republican. He has compared
Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler and Republican politicians to the genocidal maniac's Nazi enablers.
The
Six Biggest "Fake News" Stories About The Russia-Ukraine Conflict. [Scroll down] Before I start making
points about the fake news being shoved down our throats with Ukraine, I first must make my high-level opinion clear:
Russia's behavior has been horrific, they are the cause of the war, and I strongly support Ukraine with the conflict,
particularly the Ukrainian people. Meanwhile it is also obvious that there is a concerted effort being conducted by the
left and their media to mischaracterize the realities on the ground. The photographs I reference — which
include the picture that is featured in this article — have been plastered everywhere, particularly on social
media platforms and have been misrepresented by scores of blue check mark buffoons on Twitter. The truth is, these
images show President Volodymyr Zelensky during military exercises last October in the disputed Donbas region in Eastern
Ukraine, months before Russia's invasion.
Be
skeptical about media coverage of Ukraine. If you have been monitoring the coverage of the conflict in Ukraine,
it is amply clear that a narrative is being pushed. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is being compared to Winston
Churchill during World War II; he is leading his people during perilous times to become an inspiring figure. He refused
a safe passage offer from the U.S. with the quip: "I need ammunition, not a ride". He streams videos from the
deserted streets of Ukraine and posts photos with his cabinet. Photos of Zelenskyy surface in military gear on the
battlefront. To sum it up, Zelensky is being portrayed as Churchill, Rambo and social media influencers all rolled into
one. [...] It is all so poignant and inspiring until you fact-check the images. The photos of Zelensky in military gear
were from February 11, 2021, and April 9, 2021. The photo of the Russian soldier holding Ukrainian girls at gunpoint
was a 2005 photo from the West Bank. Neither the first lady of Ukraine nor the former Miss Ukraine is joining the armed
forces. The teary farewell of Ukrainian soldiers amidst the invasion was actually a photo of the happy homecoming
moment of U.S. Marines.
'Fact
Checkers' Silent as Lyin' Joe Biden Perpetuates Disgusting Capitol Riot Whopper. In the immediate aftermath of
the Capitol riot, it became very clear that the mainstream media and Democrats were going to milk the incident for all it was
worth. Initial reports talked of Capitol police officers being "murdered" by Trump-supporting rioters as they broke
through glass doorways and breached the Capitol building. It was those early false stories that were in part used by
Democrats to make their impeachment "case" against then-President Donald Trump. Within a few days, that narrative along
with others began to implode. But it took a few weeks before we saw the first major signs that the media was trying to
correct itself.
The
Right 'Loves Putin' And Other Lies The Media Tell About Trump And Russia. What is it about Russia and Vladimir
Putin that forces the American national media to lie, make things up, and blurt out statements that have no basis in
reality? The latest fiction is that Republicans and conservatives have a newfound affinity for Putin. If you only
watched MSNBC or read The New York Times, you'd be forgiven for holding the impression that all of Fox News and the
Republican party have draped themselves in Russian flags and set up GoFundMes for the invasion of Ukraine. The Times on
Sunday [2/27/2022] ran the headline, "How the American Right Stopped Worrying and Learned to Love Russia," by Emily Tamkin.
[...] Her argument might have been a little stronger if she included more searing examples of praise for Putin, like the time
Trump called him a "master tactician." Wait, sorry. That was actually how The New York Times itself described the
Russian president in mid-February. And also in October 2020.
Facebook's
Election Fact-Checker Spreads Fake Footage Of Artillery Impacts In A Populated Area In Ukraine. When Russia
launched an attack on Ukraine earlier this week, people around the world watched in shock and horror as airstrikes hit the
country and tanks began rolling in. "The prayers of the world are with the people of Ukraine tonight as they suffer an
unprovoked and unjustified attack by Russian military forces," wrote President Joe Biden in a tweet Wednesday night.
But in the last few days, it's become clear that while some of the footage and images being disseminated across social media
are depicting the tragic beginnings of a new war, some are not actually what they appear. Some of the photos and
footage being shared on Twitter, Facebook, and TikTok appear to be fake, some are from previous conflicts years ago,
explosions in other countries, or even from video games.
A New Age of Barbarism.
Political leaders in the US, Canada, Germany, and France — all NATO countries — got back on script
yesterday. [...] The part we do not see is that many of these people — together with media organs and
administrators of many deep-state bureaucracies — are absolutely thrilled to start a new season. Away with
the appalling mismanagement of the pathogen. Away with public anger toward the lockdowns and mandates. Forget the
collapse in children's literacy, the rise in cancer, the waves of depression, the trucker protests, the collapsing polls of
many elected leaders, and forget too the inflation, the federal debt, supply-chain snarls and goods shortages. Forget
all the astonishing botches of everything. Life was never as good in living memory as when we had a solid foreign enemy
named Russia with a leader with a name and a face. Everything wrong with the world could be personalized, and with
storybook thematics: good vs evil, freedom vs despotism, democracy vs dictatorship. This great struggle
was so good for both sides that they made it last 40 years.
Cops,
convoys, conservatives, and tyranny. The Mainstream Media inform us that Canadian authorities have "cleared
out" the truckers who had the temerity to think they could peacefully protest their government's COVID
vaccination-and-quarantine mandates. Note the choice of terminology: "Cleared out," as one would clear out an
infestation of vermin. In the propaganda game, words must be chosen carefully and deliberately, and the
propaganda-meisters of today (who not only "manage" the news, but frequently just invent it) make the infamous
Dr. Goebbels look like a mere tyro. [...] Anyone who's spent time on America's highways and observed big trucks knows
that the Confederate battle flag (the "Stars'n'Bars") is an emblem frequently displayed on such trucks, and not just in the
South, in numbers far in excess of those few that were seen on Canadian trucks. But the handful of such flags seen on
the Canadian trucks were enough for "journalists" to declare that such flags were proof that the Freedom Convoy was in
reality a rally of "white supremacists."
Why
They're So Afraid of the Truckers. [Scroll down] Claims linking the Canadian truckers' convoy to Nazis
appeared in the Guardian, Vox, NPR, the Atlantic, BBC, the (ironically-named) Independent, NBC, Reuters, the Washington Post,
the New York Times, and many more. Each of those 10 sources contains a line similar to this, "The truckers have been
joined by various groups, including some displaying Nazi symbols and damaging public monuments." None contained one
picture or video to support the smear. The smears remind us of the recent effort to associate the Republican candidate
for governor in Virginia with fascists. In that incident, anti-Republican activists, including the Lincoln Project,
donned costumes to pose as racist supporters of the candidate. We're also reminded of the recent criminal conviction of
Jussie Smollett for staging a fake hate crime to smear Trump supporters. We're also reminded of the many successful
lawsuits by Nick Sandmann who the media falsely accused of hate crimes. A more responsible media would have provided
proof before coordinating yet another smear against a political movement.
The
absurd 'Russiagate' Pulitzer of the NY Times and Washington Post. "For deeply sourced, relentlessly reported
coverage in the public interest," the citation from the Pulitzer Prize board begins, "that dramatically furthered the
nation's understanding of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and its connections to the Trump campaign,
the president-elect's transition team and his eventual administration." Except the journalism that the Pulitzers
honored — a 2018 National Reporting prize shared by the Washington Post and the New York Times for reporting on
Russiagate — did no such thing. It led to a dramatic misunderstanding, suggesting that Donald Trump
colluded with Vladimir Putin to help sway the 2016 election — a grand conspiracy that we now know never
existed. Oh, it was "deeply sourced," in that deep-state Democratic bureaucrats, furious that Trump had won the White
House, were falling over themselves to talk anonymously to reporters.
Arizona
Gubernatorial Candidate Kari Lake Destroys Fake News Media. Trump-endorsed Arizona Gubernatorial Candidate Kari
Lake's first television campaign advertisement will air. Her ad will only run during news shows on news stations across
Arizona. Lake has a history of exposing fake news [...] and she is doing it now with a commercial that they must
play. The video, titled "Rigged Elections Have Consequences" calls out the fake news media for their silence on the
2020 election and lists the terrible consequences we face, including our weak southern border.
5
Media Lies About The Latest Special Counsel Revelations. One week ago today, Special Counsel John Durham filed
a motion in the government's criminal case against former Hillary Clinton campaign attorney Michael Sussmann. That
motion, in requesting the court obtain Sussmann's waiver of any conflicts of interest held by his lawyers on the record,
provided in excruciating detail the factual basis for the purported conflicts. In doing so, it revealed that "enemies
of Donald Trump surveilled the internet traffic at Trump Tower, at his New York City apartment building, and later at the
executive office of the president of the United States, then fed disinformation about that traffic to intelligence agencies
hoping to frame Trump as a Russia-connected stooge."
Axios
Tries, and Fails, to Spin the Bad Economy. At Axios, Dan Primack tries to wave away the terrible polling
on the state of the economy by pretending that it is the inevitable "byproduct of a politics in which the economy is
reflexively disparaged by those out of power." It's not. It's the "byproduct" of an economy that isn't good.
All the Lies
That Are Fit to Print. Ashley Rindberg's [new book] exposes the New York Times and its longstanding
ideological roots. Rindberg offers an illuminating historical study of how the Times repeatedly has engaged in
spreading lies about National Socialism, Communism, and other authoritarian regimes and various political situations around
the world. This has been a clear pattern for decades, claims Rindsberg, and it's not difficult to see what he
means. During World War II, for example, the Times refused to acknowledge the gravity of Hitler's regime, and
the correspondents would often, quite literally and openly, use Nazi propaganda points in their articles. Was it denial
of the reality that Hitler's regime brought about or actual antisemitic support for the regime? In 1935, Frederick
Birchall, one of the Times' journalists, wrote an article about the Olympics that were then taking place in
Berlin. The anti-Jewish riots were happening during the athletic event yet Birchall decided to minimize them and focus
on the glory of the Olympics.
Why
Newspapers Refuse to Correct Errors. Many iconic U.S. newspapers sport slogans that seek to explain their
mission — and self-image. "All the News That's Fit to Print" has been called "the seven most famous words in
American journalism." "Democracy Dies in Darkness" was an overtly partisan call to arms. But the most telling
section of a newspaper's true values is its "Corrections" page. That's where journalism distinguishes itself from just
about every other profession, routinely and straightforwardly admitting its mistakes. Who else does that? It is a
soul-crushing enterprise. A single misspelled name is all it takes to ruin an otherwise stellar article. We
reporters may forget the topic of the piece we wrote last week, while the error five years ago is seared into our
memories. But it is also crucial: Reader trust is the lifeblood of journalism. If you can't believe what
you read, why bother?
Avenatti
and the Media Swindlers. If you want to feed on fake news, be bombarded by endless praise-filled coverage of
scoundrels whose fame is undeserved, and listen to just plain idiocy, keep watching television news. With the latest
conviction of former media star Michael Avenatti, I've made my case. Not only does the story of his rise and fall
illustrate my point, but the failure of the media that gave him so much praise and coverage is not the end of it. Their
lack of curiosity about his funding, even to this day, further condemns them as mere propagandists for the Left.
American
Truckers Organizing Freedom Convoy to DC but Here Come the Censors. The Freedom Convoy that made it across
Canada from Vancouver to Ottawa is now occupying the streets in front of Parliament and is being supported by people in their
efforts against vaccine mandates. [...] American truckers are now trying to follow in the footsteps of their Northern
brethren — organizing a similar convoy from California to Washington, D.C., to stand against government
overreach. But Facebook is trying to stop them, removing the page from which they were organizing the effort.
Facebook claimed that the page was violating policies around QAnon. Just as there was an effort to smear the Canadian
effort by Justin Trudeau and some in liberal media, even claiming it was somehow associated with Russia, it looks like
they're going after the U.S. effort.
Canadian
Media Claims Russia is Behind the Truckers Freedom Protest. As if the media can't get anymore desperate to
brush aside the fact their own citizens are adamantly opposed to the vax mandates, this fake news host just claimed the
entire thing is due to Russia. Once again proving the leftist media will do anything to make up a news story in order
to fit their current agenda, which currently appears to be start a war with Russia to deflect everyones attention away from
the fact people are openly rebelling against them. If a war does start, make no mistake, the government will try to
round up people who have zero to do with Russia and everything to do with not complying with the leftist globalist
agenda. [Video clip]
When Will
People Finally See the Obvious? Consider the number of things the Left has been willing to lie to the American
people about in recent years. The short list includes: COVID, suppressing its origins and effective means of
treatment; January 6, 2021, touted as worse than Pearl Harbor and 9/11 combined and jailing Capitol trespassers for over a
year without trial dates; Hunter Biden's laptop, immediately and roundly dismissed as "Russian disinformation"; destructive
and deadly riots blithely labeled "mostly peaceful protests"; and parents at school board meetings protesting critical race
theory viciously defamed and treated as would-be "domestic terrorists." But between all of these (and so many more)
major news stories, Americans en masse have begun to wake up and search for the truth outside what's being spoon-fed
(and in some cases shovel-fed) to them by the corporate left-wing media. [...] So why has this leap of faithlessness not
jumped over to the obvious facts of the 2020 election? Those currently in power have a clear track record of covering
up the truth on major news stories, but we're somehow supposed to believe what they say about the 2020 election?
Is
This 'Leaked' Video Real Or Staged? The Khaki-clad Patriot Front group was out protesting again
today — This time at the March for Life in Washington DC. Two weeks ago this mysterious khaki-clad group
showed up at the Chicago March for Life for some reason. [...] In spite of all that there seems to be little media interest
in digging deep to find out what's really going on with this group and who its members are. There is, however, plenty
of interest in videos that purport to show Patriot Front members using Nazi language and gestures. One that is said to
have been leaked is making the rounds. Does this seem staged, or authentic? [Video clip]
The Editor says...
Ask yourself: Who would benefit if it's genuine? Nobody. Who would benefit if it's fake but believable? The Democrats.
Gorsuch, Sotomayor
Push Back On NPR Story Claiming He Refused To Wear A Mask Despite Request. Associate Supreme Court Justices
Neil Gorsuch and Sonia Sotomayor put out a joint statement on Wednesday denying a recent report that Gorsuch refused to wear
a mask during oral arguments, forcing Sotomayor to participate in proceedings remotely. National Public Radio legal
correspondent Nina Totenberg claimed in a Tuesday column that Gorsuch refused a request from Chief Justice John Roberts that
all justices wear masks during oral arguments as a result of Sotomayor's fears about the Omicron variant. Sotomayor,
who has diabetes, "has not attended the justices' weekly conference in person, joining instead by telephone" as a result of
Gorsuch's refusal, Totenberg wrote. "Reporting that Justice Sotomayor asked Justice Gorsuch to wear a mask surprised
us. It is false. While we may sometimes disagree about the law, we are warm colleagues and friends," the two
justices said.
NPR's
Story About a SCOTUS Spat over Justices Wearing Masks Looks Like a Massive Pile of Fake News. It seems even the
most prestigious legal institution in the land is not immune to COVID, that is the politics of it all. The Court did
strike down the employer-based COVID vaccine mandate the Biden administration was pushing that was going to be enforced by
OSHA. Yet, it didn't come before we all saw how wrong the liberal wing of the Court was on the issue. I'm not talking
about legal differences. I'm talking about facts. Justice Sonia Sotomayor claimed that 100,000 kids were
hospitalized with COVID and on ventilators. She also said Omicron was just as deadly as Delta. Not true.
This is what happens when you only watch CNN or MSNBC all day. These people are deciding the fate of millions in the
workforce and four of them consumed, digested, and believed in pure science fiction. Luckily, that OSHA mandate was
struck down 6-3. Yet, the COVID antics have not stopped. There are reports that Chief Justice John Roberts
ordered all members to wear a mask at oral arguments. Justice Gorsuch refused which forced Justice Sotomayor to work
remotely. Now, here's where the red flag comes in — it's an NPR story.
Conspiracies
as Realities, Realities as Conspiracies. Consider that the Trump election of 2016, the transition, and the
first two years of the Trump presidency were undermined by a media-progressive generated hoax of "Russian collusion." The
"bombshell" and "walls are closing in" mythologies dominated the network news and cable outlets. It took five years to
expose them as rank agit-prop. Robert Mueller and his "dream team" consumed $40 million of Americans' money and 22 months
of our time — to find the nothingburger that most of the country already knew was nothing. Yet the subtext of the
2018 Democratic takeover of the House was the media narrative that Trump, as Hillary Clinton put it, was an "illegitimate" president,
due to Russian collusion. Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper claimed on national television that Trump was
a "Russian asset." Former CIA head John Brennan assured the nation that the president was "treasonous," due to his supposed
"lies to the American people." All sorts of politicians, retired military, and news anchors echoed the charges. The lies
and myths of has-been British spy Christopher Steele made him a leftist hero. They were repeated ad nauseam as truth.
Is the
tide finally turning? On the COVID front, suddenly we see a rash of what we used to call in the news business
"skin-backs." In plain English, that would be corrections. In journalism and politics, that's particularly painful, so
skin-back captures it pretty well. I think the Covidians have already begun The Big Skin-Back. So many lies for
so long are becoming so obviously lies that they need to get ahead of the story. Otherwise, their only option is to
continue to defend the lies in the face of overwhelming mounting evidence of their duplicity and, after losing battle after
battle, completely destroy their credibility, even with mainstream media.
Fact
Check: Fact-Checkers Falsely Claim They Are Fact-Checkers. Defending the ruling regime in Washington is a
tough job with a lot of moving parts. To keep everyone on message and to make sure that only the regime's message is
the controlling one in the public square, you need committed politicians, woke multinational corporations, corporate media,
and devoutly loyal followers who will echo that message far and wide. Not all of these echo chambers are created
equal. For example, in the corporate media, some get to host to the fancy nighttime cable shows and make massive
salaries while others have to handle the less glamorous and talent-demanding work, like pumping out endless "fact checks."
These lower-level operatives serve their purpose in service of the regime, however. They supply the committed masses
with clickbait that can be amplified by those eager to believe that the regime's message is not only preferable but is the
absolute and only truth. They exist to make us believe that to be on the side of the regime's message is to be on the
side of the facts.
January
6 and the real 'Big Lie'. [Scroll down] The real Big Lie has been — and is still
being — aided, abetted, and promoted by the Big Liars in the mainstream media. No longer lie-detectors, they
are lie-projectors, smear merchants, enemies of the people so full of it that industrial-sized enemas couldn't clean
them out. Bizarrely binary, they are nothing more than Deep State-approved mouth organs of the Democrat party,
essentially state-run organizations when Democrats are in power and sworn enemies of the state when Republicans hold
office. They are Merchants of Menace. The clowns at MSNBC, the Lolita-lovers at CNN, the "ladies" on The
View, and the partisan pseudo-journalist hacks at fish-wrap factories like The New York Times and The Washington Post all
routinely say the same things... in the same way. They consistently beclown themselves but are not open-minded enough
to realize it.
Top five
media lies of 2021. [#2] Ma'Khia Bryant was murdered by a racist police officer: In April, a police
officer shot Ma'Khia Bryant, a black teenager in Columbus, Ohio, as she was trying to stab another girl. The footage
from the officer's body camera made it very clear that the shooting was justified and the officer acted to save the woman's
life. The corporate media ran with the story that Ma'Khia Bryant had been murdered by a police officer because of her race.
Many outlets, such as the New York Times and The Daily Beast, even claimed she was unarmed at the moment of the shooting.
Pandemic
Response Will Be Used As Model for "Climate Crisis" Response. Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, experts have
assured worried populations that their policies would contain the virus, prevent infections, and save lives. After two
weeks of shutting down the country and sealing ourselves off, we would "flatten the curve" and then proceed with our lives as
normal. As we round out the second year of the "two weeks," I also recall that Biden's COVID advisor Dr. Anthony
Facui assured us that once we hit 70% vaccination rates, we would no longer see surges in coronavirus cases. [...] One of the
advantages about living through this pandemic is that we have the ability to see scientific "experts" fail in their
projections in real time. We have also observed politically connected bureaucrats stifle robust and essential
scientific debate, as they colluded with the media to silence well qualified opposition to the latest pet theories and
policies. For example, Dr. Francis Collins, then director of the National Institutes of Health, sent an email to
Facui concerned about the Great Barrington Declaration, a statement developed by Harvard's Martin Kulldorff, Oxford's Sunetra
Gupta and Stanford's Jay Bhattacharya against blanket pandemic lockdowns. The two organized a media smear campaign to
paint these scientists as "fringe".
A Myth is Born: How
CDC, FDA, and Media Wove a Web of Ivermectin Lies That Outlives The Truth. When a Texas cattleman,
seventy-nine, died last September in New Mexico after contracting covid, his family never anticipated the worldwide headlines
that would ensue. In a ballyhooed press conference, New Mexico Human Services Secretary Dr. David Scrase, the
state's top health chief, announced New Mexico's first ivermectin "overdose," soon adding a second fatality allegedly from
"ivermectin toxicity." Now, Scrase has acknowledged that his repeated, what he called "offhand," assertions were
groundless. Two deaths were not caused by ivermectin, a long-used generic drug that was emerging as a covid
treatment. Instead, he said that the pair died because they "actually just delayed their care with covid." That is
a big difference. Scrase backpedaled on December 1 in a little-noticed online press briefing and only after we pressed
his agency to provide evidence for its claims of so-called "ivermectin deaths." Officials had repeatedly said they were
awaiting a toxicology report on the cattleman's death. Yet we learned that the report was never even ordered or done,
and, moreover, the man's death was ruled by the state's coroner as being from "natural" causes.
In
2021, Media Did More to Erode Trust Than to Repair It. The case of actor Jussie Smollett's fake hate crime came
to a conclusion this month, revealing that media outlets still are eager to pounce on a racially divisive story and cast
blame, but reluctant to examine themselves when the story falls apart. [...] Earlier this month, Smollett was convicted of
five of six counts of disorderly conduct, all stemming from his lies to Chicago police about the "hate crime" he staged with
the help of others. And how did the media react to this outcome? Not well, and in some cases, not at all.
ABC News, which had featured Smollett and allowed the actor to elaborate on the hoax in 2019, failed to tell viewers that his
trial was underway. When Smollett's guilty verdicts were announced, the entire prime-time lineup on MSNBC completely
ignored the news, despite the fact that the network was one of the principal promoters of Smollett's original claims.
An incredible headline on CNN muttered: "Jussie Smollett guilty on some charges," blatantly downplaying the multiple
verdicts. It would have been more accurate to say "most charges," or even better, the precisely accurate "five of six."
And finally, some wondered why we were talking about the Smollett verdicts at all.
Glenn
Greenwald Points To The One Moment That Changed The Pandemic And Destroyed Trust In Media. Journalist Glenn
Greenwald said in a Tuesday [12/28/2021] Twitter thread that there was one single moment that changed media coverage of the
coronavirus pandemic — and that when it "flipped overnight," it destroyed trust in media. The death of
George Floyd — at the hands of former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin — and the massive
protests it inspired prompted a near-180 turn from multiple media outlets that had just spent the previous weeks telling
Americans that the only patriotic thing to do was stay home to stop the spread of the virus. "This was a pivotal moment
in the pandemic's history," Greenwald began. "For 4 months, the message was clear and unrelenting: everyone must
stay home. Those who leave — even to go to a deserted beach — are reckless sociopaths. It
flipped overnight to endorse a mass protest movement liberals liked." [...] "That episode single-handedly destroyed trust in
public health officials, proving they'd politicize their expertise when convenient," Greenwald continued, referencing experts
who had joined media broadcasts to argue that systemic racism and police brutality posed greater health risks than the
rapidly-spreading virus. "Corporate media celebrated a [...] lawyer shaming families at deserted beaches,
then — overnight! — cheered densely packed street protests."
Biden's
Approval Ratings Are Inflated. There has been a lot of publicity around Joe Biden's poor approval ratings, but
I think his actual standing with the electorate is worse than they indicate. Take, for example, the Rasmussen survey,
which I think is valuable because 1) unlike other polls, it samples likely voters, and 2) it polls constantly, publishing a
three-day rolling average. Thus, whether the numbers are "right" or not, they are a good indicator of trends. In
Joe Biden's case, the trend has been obvious: his approval rating quickly dropped to around 42%, and there it sits.
But I don't believe that 40+% of voters, surveying the wreckage of the last year, actually think that Biden is doing a good
job. Some of them are lying to the pollster, out of party loyalty. We saw the same thing during the Obama
administration. It is more revealing to see how voters assess a president's performance on specific issues.
People
Demand Rachel Maddow, MSNBC Apologize for False COVID Comments. [Scroll down] But Fauci wasn't the only
one facing criticism today. The other person was Rachel Maddow. However, it wasn't for anything that she said
recently; it was for comments that she made back in March that people were now calling into question. Viewers were
demanding an apology from Maddow and MSNBC for this video from March 29, in which she claimed that if you were vaccinated,
it would stop the virus in its tracks and prevent transmission. [Tweet with video clip] Maddow said, "Now we know
that the vaccines work well enough that the virus stops with every vaccinated person." "A vaccinated person gets
exposed to the virus, the virus does not infect them, the virus cannot then use that person to go anywhere else," she
continued. "It cannot use a vaccinated person as a host to go get more people." Maddow stated that vaccines "would get
us to the end of this," meaning the end of the pandemic. This is just untrue. While the transmission is allegedly
less likely, vaccinated people can still get the virus and spread it.
The
Covid fear factory is trembling. [Scroll down] At this point the question naturally arises: Why is
it that the public health establishment and the media are working hard to generate a tide of public hysteria around Omicron?
[...] It's not by chance that the media is obsessing about case count. Case counts are one of the most deceptive
measures of pandemic severity when symptoms are mild to non-existent in the majority of the infected.
What
do the UK Vaccine Surveillance Reports tell us? [Scroll down] Each time when we've heard "The pandemic of
the unvaccinated" from the media and politicians, we can be reasonably sure that they are not talking about the actual health
of those people, for whatever reason, do not take the vaccine. Instead, they have actually been concerned about
"Overwhelming the healthcare system" with unvaccinated people. However, the raw data from the UK health systems shows
that more vaccinated people than unvaccinated ones were using the healthcare system. There is no such "raw data"
available in the U.S. All we can find is some kind of rate. CDC once had a CDC MMWR report that was based on the data
from 13 U.S. jurisdictions. That report stated that, once Delta appeared, vaccinated people reduced their risk of
infection by five times, and both their risk of hospitalization and risk of death by more than ten times. The report
acknowledges that the data from 13 jurisdictions "might not be generalizable," and that's true. It's nonsense.
Nevertheless, the Mainstream Media and politicians immediately started to propagandize based on that report.
Here There
Be Monsters. Tech company oligarchs, media conglomerates, and pharmaceutical companies have collaborated with
the federal government to encapsulate Americans in a fantasy of incomplete, misleading, false, and contrived
information. Unlike the federal government, the predominant social media are not constrained in disregarding the First
Amendment, and routinely engage in outright censorship and speech suppression. As long as it serves the government's
purposes, curtailing its opponents' free speech is fine. All U.S. "mainstream" media are owned and controlled by six
corporations. Those corporations call the shots on what does and does not get news coverage, how that coverage is
fashioned, and its content. To believe the U.S. "mainstream" media represent a free press is more an act of faith than
believing in Santa Claus or the Tooth Fairy. Acts of outrageous media hypocrisy occur on a daily basis, always favoring
the Left/government's preferences. News censorship and content control are hallmarks of totalitarian government, and
the U.S. checks both boxes today.
Here
is the Mainstream Media in Israel Fabricating a Story. If you wanted to see how corrupt the mainsteam media
outlets are across the planet, here is several Israeli news organizations working together to fabricate the entire pandemic
fraud that has swept the world. They even recorded themselves setting the entire thing up, luckily, it allows us to see
just how far they're going to setup these stories about hospitals being overwhelmed, mass deaths, etc. [Video clip]
It's
Beginning to Look a Lot Like Pravda. Interesting short segment from Sky News interviewing the smiling U.K.
Health Minister Gillian Keegan about the intense U.K. response to the Omicron variant and the new restrictions announced by
government officials. Great Britain is preparing for hundreds-of-thousands of Omicron cases. [Video clip]
The High Price of Bidenomics.
American humorist Edgar Wilson Nye famously observed, "Wagner's music is better than it sounds." Recently, the White
House and its numerous allies in the "news" media have been telling an increasingly skeptical electorate a similarly
self-refuting tale about the Biden economy. Typical of the stories that have appeared in major news outlets is this
howler from CNN's Julian Zelizer, who insists that there is "a huge disconnect between the economic data and the way voters
are feeling." Anyone naïve enough to believe such balderdash will be disabused of their illusions by reading
Friday's Bureau of Labor Statistics report showing that the consumer price index (CPI) has risen by 6.8 percent during
the 12-month period ending in November.
Liberal
Media Pushes Bonkers Conspiracy Theory About Florida Governor Ron DeSantis. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis is
moving to create a civilian corps in his state to help when natural disasters like hurricanes hit. Twenty-two other
states already have the exact same thing, but the media is portraying it as a private militia to do DeSantis' personal
bidding. This is the same media that is constantly accusing others of spreading conspiracy theories.
Willie
Horton and the Democratic Party's Greatest Fear. [Scroll down] Fast-forward to November 21, 2021. In
the tranquil suburban community of Waukesha, Wisconsin, a vicious bigot named Darrell Brooks — free on bail with
multiple pending felonies, one being his recent attempt to run over his onetime girlfriend with his SUV —
allegedly drove through a Christmas parade, running down as many innocent people as he could, killing at least five, injuring
some sixty more. Media-watchers have already begun to comment on how relatively little detailed coverage there has
been. We have noticed blatant photo-editing techniques used to lighten the perpetrator's skin in media photos. We
have seen a surprising lack of MSM interest in both the man's history and his apparent motive. We have seen, if
anything, a textbook case in how to all but bury a story too big to dismiss.
Why
Jussie Smollett deserves to be punished for his shameful hoax. On January 29, 2019, African American actor
Jussie Smollett who is gay claimed that two masked men wearing MAGA hats hurled racist and homophobic abuses at him. He
claims that they proceeded to punch him, pour a chemical substance over him, put a rope around his neck and berate him with
"this is MAGA country." He also claimed that he had received a hate mail consisting of a barrage of racist invectives.
The US mainstream media gleefully carried and amplified the story because it fits their narrative of far-right Trump supporters
persecuting a gay man of color. Instances such as these explain why very few in the US trust their news media.
The Cynical
and Dangerous Weaponization of the "White Supremacist" Label. Within hours of the August 25, 2020, shootings in
Kenosha, Wisconsin — not days, but hours — it was decreed as unquestioned fact in mainstream political
and media circles that the shooter, Kyle Rittenhouse, was a "white supremacist." Over the next fifteen months, up to and
including his acquittal by a jury of his peers on all charges, this label was applied to him more times than one can count by
corporate media outlets as though it were proven fact. Indeed, that Rittenhouse was a "white supremacist" was deemed so
unquestionably true that questioning it was cast as evidence of one's own racist inclinations (defending a white
supremacist). Yet all along, there was never any substantial evidence, let alone convincing proof, that it was
true. This fact is, or at least should be, an extraordinary, even scandalous, event: a 17-year-old was widely vilified
as being a white supremacist by a union of national media and major politicians despite there being no evidence to
support the accusation. Yet it took his acquittal by a jury who heard all the evidence and testimony for parts of the
corporate press to finally summon the courage to point out that what had been Gospel about Rittenhouse for the last fifteen
months was, in fact, utterly baseless.
It was an act of intentional, race-based, black-on-white, vehicular homicide. It was not accidental. Waukesha Parade
Attack: Debra Messing Blasts Media For Downplaying Massacre As An 'Accident'. Actress Debra Messing took
aim at the media for "minimizing" the attack that occurred at a Christmas parade in Waukesha, Wisconsin. Darrell Brooks
has been charged with intentional homicide after driving his SUV through a crowded street commemorating the holiday season,
resulting in the deaths of six people ages 8 to 81 and injuring dozens more. However, many media outlets had been
referring to the attack as a "parade crash," downplaying the intent prosecutors have leveled against the career criminal.
Everything
the Media Told You About Kyle Rittenhouse Was Wrong. Last week's acquittal of Kyle Rittenhouse, the teenager
charged with the murder of two men in Kenosha, Wis., likely came as a shock to millions of Americans who had relied on the
media to inform their understanding of the case. From the time Rittenhouse killed two men on the streets of Kenosha
last August, media characterizations of the event suggested his conviction was a foregone conclusion. He was a troubled
kid, "a high school dropout who viewed law enforcement as his personal heroes" and had "an affinity for guns." Many
took pains to point out that he had attended a rally for then-president Donald Trump. A New York Times report
found that he "showed strong support for officers." The Daily Beast referred to him as a "fanatic." The
men Rittenhouse shot in self-defense quickly became sympathetic figures. Anthony Huber, who attacked Rittenhouse with a
skateboard, died doing something "heroic," according to CNN — which was quoting Huber's girlfriend. In a
piece that has since been edited, the network described Joseph Rosenbaum, a convicted child rapist, as somebody who would
"make you laugh out of nowhere."
It's time to revisit the coverage of
Kyle Rittenhouse. [Thread reader] With the news that he has been acquitted on all counts, don't forget the
ways that Dems and the corporate press came together to craft a false narrative in his case. [...] We need to start with
the media coverage that framed this case in the public mind. To the press, Rittenhouse was as good as guilty when the
news broke. So naturally, to @CNN, the people he shot in self defense were heroes & those defending him had "justified
murder." [Tweets] This wasn't just limited to CNN. [The New York Times] put out what amounts to a hit piece on
Rittenhouse because his "social media accounts showed strong support for officers." They even put out a piece about how
right-wingers attacking protestors was some sort of phenomenon. [Tweets] Never to be outdone, @MSNBC said the shooting
was white supremacy and then went on to blame — who else — President Trump for "fueling violence," sowing
"chaos and disorder" and "encouraging vigilante justice"[.]
How
Unethical Were the Prosecutors Trying to Put Kyle Rittenhouse in Prison? Let Us Count the Ways.
Americans, already disgusted by the FBI, manufactured Trump Russia scandals, and counterintelligence investigations into
concerned parents like they're members of Al Qaeda, closely watched this case and were repulsed by the chicanery used to
prosecute Rittenhouse. They're supposed to be the justice guys, right? It's a wonder that Rittenhouse was
found not guilty on all counts. You can blame Leftist propagandists or your laziness if you believed that Rittenhouse's
assailants were black, or that his gun was illegal, or that he brought it "across state lines," or that he was a "chaos
tourist" and a "vigilante." But there's a special Mike Nifong-sized ring of hell for prosecutors who introduce these
slanders into a courtroom, knowing that their subterfuge might put a kid away for the rest of his life. Thomas Binger
and Jim Kraus did this in many ways, by invoking lies — that they knew were lies — into pre-trial bail
hearings, motions, and then ultimately into the courtroom itself in the trial. All of these lies were dutifully
transcribed by friendly journalists.
The
Rittenhouse trial: Our corporate media and big tech are truly sinister. Nothing more conclusively proves
the depraved nature of the American media than the Rittenhouse trial. The then-seventeen-year-old, as numerous videos
of the event proved, was clearly under attack by the three men who chased him and he subsequently shot in self-defense. There
is simply no doubt about that. There was no racial aspect to what happened. The two men who died were criminals.
Jacob Rosenbaum had just served fifteen years in prison for anally raping five boys, ages 9 [to] 11. That night
he set a dumpster on fire, was swinging a heavy chain around and screaming the n-word. Huber, the man who had hit
Rittenhouse with a skateboard, also had a criminal record for domestic abuse. So did Grosskreutz who admitted under oath
to pointing a gun at Rittenhouse's head before Rittenhouse pulled the trigger injuring his arm. Jacob Blake, the thug
whose shooting by police got the riot going thanks to the media, was a rapist as well. He was in the act of kidnapping
a child and threatening the police with a knife when he was shot. [...] There are people today, even after the verdict, who
think Rittenhouse shot Black men, that Rittenhouse was there, in the city his father lives in, to purposefully engage with
BLM rioters, that his gun was illegal. None of that is true.
Goal
Of Rittenhouse Prosecution and Media Manipulation Is To Render "Citizens Not Being Able To Defend Themselves".
[Scroll down] So the narrative is Kyle Rittenhouse is a militia member who crossed state lines with a weapon to shoot
peaceful protest is protestors. None of those things are true, other than he did cross the state line. Like
that's some big deal nowadays, but he wasn't carrying a weapon. The weapon was already in Wisconsin. He was
lawfully able to possess it in Wisconsin. That's why the judge threw out the charge of being a minor in possession.
He wasn't in an militia. Remember there's certainly no evidence introduced to that. And he didn't shoot peaceful
protestors. He shoot shot three extremely violent people who tried to kill him. So that media narrative is out
there. It will never go away. And that has framed the case for political purposes, that this is white supremacy
on trial here. So you have Black Lives Matter protesters out there claiming racism for a white kid who shot three
white people. This has nothing to do with race yet. That's what it's turned into.
Once
more with feeling! Media coverage of the Rittenhouse case was hot garbage. We covered this territory
during the trial but now that it's over it's worth remembering that the media's coverage of this case was terrible from the
moment it happened. Today, Drew Holden put together a thread hitting some of the lowlights: [...]
10
Media Myths Exploded During the Kyle Rittenhouse Trial. [#1] "White supremacist": There was never any
evidence that Rittenhouse was a "white supremacist," even by the time Biden made that false claim last September. The
prosecution confirmed that fact during the trial when it failed to produce evidence of any kind that Rittenhouse was a "white
supremacist" or had racial motivations. The owners of the car dealership who asked Rittenhouse and others for help were
Indian-American. [...] [#7] Rittenhouse "crossed state lines": It is true that Rittenhouse is from Antioch, Illinois.
But he was working last summer as a lifeguard in Wisconsin, and his father lives in Kenosha — a fact that tripped the
prosecution when they tried to portray Rittenhouse as a kind of outsider, a "chaos tourist" who neither cared about nor was
familiar with the local community.
Kyle
Rittenhouse and the False Narrative. The Kyle Rittenhouse trial is an important moment in American culture,
because this isn't just about Kyle Rittenhouse. [...] For me, the unacknowledged heroes of the Rittenhouse case are the
intrepid videographers who were on the scene recording what was taking place on the street. Without them, Rittenhouse
would probably be facing a real risk of being convicted for double murder. Why? Because he's dealing with a
dishonest prosecutor, who doesn't hesitate to say things he knows are misleading; dishonest detectives, who don't hesitate to
twist the truth; and a dishonest media, which has been brazenly lying about what happened between Rittenhouse and his
combatants for a whole year. [...] If you read media accounts of the confrontation, you would get the clear impression that
it was Rittenhouse who was chasing Rosenbaum, not the other way around. For anyone reading these accounts, it would
seem that the men were minding their own business when Rittenhouse decided on his own to hunt and gun them down.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
It's all about the narrative —
facts [notwithstanding]. Jussie Smollett was not attacked by MAGA-hatted white thugs; the media treated his
initial story with complete credulity. Christine Blasey Ford provided no supporting evidence for her allegations
against Brett Kavanaugh; the media treated her as a groundbreaking heroine. The high schoolers of Covington Catholic
did not mock a Native American man; the media treated them as evil white supremacists. Jacob Blake was not wrongfully
shot by police; the media treated his shooting as a case of systemic police racism. No evidence was ever presented that
Derek Chauvin killed George Floyd based on race; his case nonetheless became the point of the spear in our "national
conversation" about racism. How many facts will die at the hands of media-crafted narratives? As many as need to
die in order to achieve political utopia for the left.
Retract
Every Russian Collusion Story and Fire Everyone Who Wrote Them. [Scroll down] But the [Washington]
Post should not just unapologetically correct the phony stories on Millian; every single article, column, and video
that supports the now-debunked Russian collusion hoax should be retracted with a lengthy explanation. Tom Hamburger,
who was in cahoots with Simpson from the start and met with Simpson and Christopher Steele in September 2016 to accelerate
the narrative weeks before the presidential election, should be fired. Immediately. So, too, should
Helderman. And Post editors should force the pair to return the Pulitzer Prize they won, along with several
New York Times reporters, in 2018 for "deeply sourced, relentlessly reported coverage in the public interest that
dramatically furthered the nation's understanding of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and its
connections to the Trump campaign, the President-elect's transition team and his eventual administration." This unfolding
scandal is not only about how inaccurately the media covered Sergei Millian or the bogus Steele dossier. There was no
collusion between the Trump presidential campaign and the Russians. Period. And everyone knew it at the
time. Tom Hamburger knew it, Rosalind Helderman, everyone at MSNBC, CNN, the New York Times, the Wall Street
Journal and more knew it was fabricated garbage peddled by a well-known paid smear merchant who was disguising another
paid political operative as a "western intelligence officer."
Trump
Dossier Coverage 'One of the Most Egregious Journalistic Errors' in History, Admits Corporate Media. Axios, one
of the leading D.C.-based corporate media outlets, has admitted that reporting surrounding the now infamous Trump-Steele
dossier was "one of the most egregious journalistic errors in modern history," in an article slamming news-media colleagues
for the years of fake news reporting. "...[T]he media's response to its own mistakes has so far been tepid," wrote Sara
Fischer on Sunday morning, as it becomes increasingly clear to the nation's journalistic class that not only were they
willingly duped for years, but that they have made almost no efforts to correct their outright falsehoods.
The
Russia hoax was the journalism version of check kiting. The Russia hoax, as President Trump correctly called
it, is turning out to be a legal problem for some and a credibility collapse for journalism. [...] In the real world, the
victims of check kiting end up in the courts, trying to get their money. In the media world, they click the channel off
or cancel their subscriptions. Can anyone read a story based on sources close to the information and take it seriously
anymore? I don't. I take those stories as seriously as I do those polls based on "adults." Let's hope
Mr. Durham understands how important his task is. He owes the country an explanation for how something like this
could happen.
When
Liberal Media Narratives Blow Up. Today it's Kyle Rittenhouse. Not long ago it was young Nicholas
Sandmann. And, of course, for four years or so it was the Trump-Russia collusion business. What do these three
episodes have in common? That would be the fact of a wildly untrue liberal media narrative. [...] So what do we have
here? What we have is a crystal clear pattern of the media substituting liberal bias for the facts of a given
story. The center of the story of the moment could be Kyle Rittenhouse or Nicholas Sandmann or Trump-Russia
collusion. It could be, heaven knows, all manner of other news stories. But the one constant in each is that the
liberals at these liberal media outlets deliberately — say again deliberately — report the facts of a
case with a far left bias. Now the liberal narrative of Kyle Rittenhouse seems to be falling apart in a court of law.
The question is, will the liberal media learn from this? Will it finally learn that in reporting the news it's the facts,
not the political bias of a liberal narrative, that should rule? Don't bet the ranch.
Joe
Biden Calls Satchel Paige "The Great Negro" — Media Immediately Says Biden Did Not Say What You Saw Him
Say. Comrades, the ministry of truth does not want you to misunderstand what Joe Biden is saying in these
prepared remarks. Do not believe your eyes and ears, Joe Biden is not saying: ..."You know, I've adopted the
attitude of the great negro at the time, pitcher in the negro leagues went on to become a great pitcher in the pros, into
the, major league baseball after Jackie Robinson, his name was Satchel Paige". Joe Biden is NOT saying this, according to
U.S. media immediately afterward. [Video clip]
A Deeper Divide. After the
George Floyd death the mainstream media covered BLM in expected flattering terms. So much so that Main Street believes
that in a typical year police kill anywhere from 1,000 to 10,000 unarmed black men. The real figure last year was
eighteen. The U.S. Crime Victimization Study also reveals a different story: In a normal year like 2019, among
violent crimes involving a white perp and a black victim or a black perp and a white victim, 70 to 90 percent of such
incidents are black-on-white crimes. True statistics aside, American society's generators like universities, media,
entertainment, and Big Tech continue to spread the view that oppressors rule the nation and that slavery defines American history.
Turley:
The media oddly missed the "crash and burn" of Rittenhouse prosecutors this week. They didn't miss it at
all — national media outlets just tried their best to report around it. We have covered the errors and
outright violations committed by Kenosha prosecutors in the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse, and so our readers are aware of what
Jonathan Turley describes as the "crash and burn" of the murder case over the past week. Most media consumers have
instead been fed a narrative of judicial bias and bizarre attempts to inject race into a case where the accused, the alleged
victims, and most of the witnesses are all white.
The
Leftist Media Lied Through Their Teeth about Kyle Rittenhouse. One clip after another shows just how many lies
the liberal media was willing to concoct in order to pain Kyle Rittenhouse as the bad guy. Now, that the case has been
seen and viewed publicly, most intelligent people are realizing all of the lies the liberal media told, i.e. "A white
supremacist," who was "looking to murder protesters." Is just that, more lies from a media who makes the story up as they go.
How
did we get here? Can this mess be fixed? [Scroll down] Long ago, there was a day, we are told
(because none of us was around to witness it), when most people believed what they read in a newspaper. Gradually, that
myth faded. We learned that journalists weren't always truthful. Today, a scant 14% trust what the media, press,
or journalists have to say. That's part of the price we pay for undermining truth. Lying, conniving, and
propagandizing journalists get a fair share of the blame. But few people understood journalism's function even in the
good old days. Journalists do not tell the truth. They tell what people tell them. If a reporter or
commentator limited his published words to "the truth," he would publish little with certainty apart from the date.
I've yet to meet a journalist, and I've met thousands, capable of ferreting out "the truth" in complex issues. Some do
better than others by compiling an array of evidence and testimony. But in the end, it's the same story: "so-and-so
says so." It's unavoidable, a hazard of the genre.
Media
Reveals Just How Misleading They Can Be When It Comes to Rittenhouse Coverage. We've written before about how
the prosecution seems to have been imploding its own case in the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse. There was the opening
statement where the prosecutor, Thomas Binger, claimed that Rittenhouse was chasing Joseph Rosenbaum rather than the truth
that it was the other way around. [...] Today was perhaps the capper of them all that completely blew up the case. The
defense was questioning Gaige Grosskreutz — the third man Rittenhouse shot. Grosskreutz admitted that he
advanced on Rittenhouse and pointed the gun at him and it was only after that, that Rittenhouse shot him. [...] We see how
media is portraying the trial today so we can see just how misleading it is because we know what happened at the trial.
We can't always see all the facts in a story that the media reports on in the way we did here. Yet, this is how they
are casting the trial? Are they kidding? And they wonder why Americans no longer trust them? This is a
perfect example of why.
3 points about the news
media. [Thread reader] The vast majority of disinformation, propaganda and lies that flooded the country
over the last 5 years did not come from MAGA boomers on Facebook or 4Chan teenagers but the largest and most influential
liberal corporate media outlets. These are not cases where media outlets erred. They deliberately lied. The
way to know that is they refuse to acknowledge evidence proving they lied.
Never
Trumpers and Black Lives Matter Have the Same Backer. The press releases went out on schedule and the media
rewrote them into news stories. A group of "principled" Republicans was going to fundraise to support Democrat
congressmen. The stories rolled out on schedule from different media outlets while appearing nearly identical.
And the real story, as usual, was not what was on the page, but what had been deliberately left out. Reuters described
the Renew America Movement as a group of Never Trump Republicans "whose leadership includes former Republican Governors
Christine Todd Whitman of New Jersey and Bill Weld of Massachusetts." Hardly a single story mentioned the actual
leaders. The Renew America Movement was co-founded by Evan McMullin and his running mate Mindy Finn. Its national
political director, Joel Searby, who is quoted in the media's writeups, was the chief strategist for the McMullin
campaign. Donations to RAM go through Stand Up Republic, which is the anti-Trump group that McMullin and Finn
originally set up. The press release for the new pro-Democrat campaign even came from Stand Up Republic. The
media actually had to work not to mention McMullin or Stand Up Republic in its stories about the RAM campaign. And the
media did a fine job of lying by omission to the public in order to elect Democrats.
Our
mostly complicit, compliant, sycophant press has no concern about facts, only Democrat power. What happened to
Donald Trump in 2016 and beyond dwarfed Watergate. Most of the media not only didn't care about the corruption of the
Democrats, but were also major participants in seeking to destroy a candidate, and later president, they didn't like.
Special counsel John Durham has started to hit paydirt with three arrests so far, the tip of the iceberg, and the story is
essentially buried because the media don't care, and they don't want the public to know the truth. If the public learns
the truth, they will see how dishonest, corrupt, and dangerous the media are. They will set out to destroy anyone they
don't want in elective office. The truth and evidence are never necessary when they are campaigning for Democrats.
Democrats
Traipsing Through Strawberry Fields. Start with critical race theory, one of the major issues in school board
elections nationwide and in the Virginia gubernatorial race. Former Bush Republican, now a Trump-hating liberal
Democrat, MSNBC's Nicolle Wallace declared that critical race theory "isn't real." Her strawberry fields analysis of a
Republican sweep in Virginia, the GOP winning the governor, lieutenant governor, and attorney general positions was, "So, I
think that the real ominous thing, is that critical race theory, which isn't real, turned the suburbs 15 points to the
Trump-insurrection-endorsed Republican." Maybe in the cocooned studios of MSNBC, critical race theory is some QAnon or
white supremacist conspiracy theory, but to voters it was quite real, and concerning. If critical race theory is not
real, someone should tell Amazon as they offer numerous books on the subject, in education and mathematics, how to teach it
in school and how to respond to "microaggressions," meaning any viewpoint that challenges the CRT agenda. Defeated
gubernatorial candidate Terry McAuliffe told fellow Democrat Chuck Todd shortly before the election that critical race theory
has "never been taught" in the state's public schools and that the fight to ban the theory from school curricula is a "racist
dog whistle." McAuliffe also claimed that eventual gubernatorial victor Glenn Youngkin "wants to ban critical race
theory." Chuck Todd missed the obvious follow up question of why something that doesn't exist or isn't taught would need
to be banned?
7
Insane Things I Just Learned About How U.S. Elections Are 'Rigged'. [#6] It's No Longer Media Bias, It's Media Lies: As my
opening to this essay explains, I'm aware media bias has been transcended by outright propaganda. In her book, however, Mollie [Hemingway]
makes an excellent point about this after detailing other cases proving this shift. She makes it in relation to what I'd call a relatively
minor offense — The New York Times publishing a Trump-smearing piece from an anonymous author it described as a "senior administration official,"
meaning "someone in the upper echelon of an administration." Of course, it turned out this person wasn't any such thing. He was just a
mid-level bureaucrat.
McAuliffe
buys 'fake news' ads in effort to sway voters, Fox News investigation finds. Former Gov. Terry McAuliffe
has spent nearly $100,000 advertising "fake news" websites on Facebook during the Virginia gubernatorial campaign, Fox News
can reveal. The Democrat's advertisements, which have been viewed up to 3.5 million times so far, are hidden on
a Facebook page with a similar name to a local news website. The ads link to third-party websites that ostensibly publish
local news, but exist to promote Democratic candidates. The websites have been widely described as disinformation and
"partisan propaganda."
Axios
Blames American Consumers, Not Bad Policy for Labor Shortages. Blame the American consumer! That's the
approach liberal outlet Axios used to explain away the atrocious labor shortages affecting the U.S. economy, and not
President Joe Biden's economic policies. Axios published a snobbish piece headlined, "Unruly customers threaten
economic recovery." The outlet's asinine argument was that "increasingly violent and combative customers," angry about
"long wait times and mask mandates," were causing workers to quit, hamstringing a recovery that hinges in part on employees
"returning to work." But unlike Axios, The Wall Street Journal editorial board didn't hesitate to pin the labor
shortage blame on the proper culprit: "Bidenomics." The Journal suggested two specific sources for what
has been causing the worker shortage. The sources it mentioned were: "government and employer vaccine mandates that set
ultimatums for workers" and Democrats making "quitting an easier economic option" through a litany of federal unemployment benefits.
Age-Adjusted
Mortality Is at 2004 Levels. Yet They Tell Us Covid Is Worse Than the 1918 Flu.. Last week, the media
again tried to ratchet up the public's fear over covid-19 by labeling it more deadly than the 1918 flu epidemic.
"COVID-19 Is Now the Deadliest Disease in U.S. History," reads one headline from an NBC TV affiliate. Considering the
realities of cancer and heart disease, that headline is absurdly false. Perhaps the author meant "communicable
disease." A TIME headline was at least arguably factual, declaring, "COVID-19 Is Now the Deadliest Pandemic in American
History." But even the TIME headline is only arguably true if stripped of all context. If we actually look at
disease mortality proportionally to the population, the 1918 epidemic was far worse than covid. Considering that the US
population in 1918 was one-third its current size, we find that deaths per million from the flu epidemic totaled about
sixty-five hundred per million. Covid, by comparison currently comes in — in the official numbers —
around twenty-two hundred per million. But this is all part of a larger pattern — one well embraced by the
media — of presenting information with as little context as possible.
Gallup:
Trust In The Media Sinks to 36 Percent, Second Lowest Ever. Can the mistrust of the media get much greater?
Gallup pollsters reported on Thursday [10/7/2021] that American trust in the media "to report the news fully, accurately and
fairly has edged down four percentage points since last year to 36 percent, making this year's reading the second lowest in
Gallup's trend." Overall, just seven percent of U.S. adults say they have "a great deal" and 29 percent "a fair amount"
of trust and confidence in newspapers, television and radio news reporting — which, combined, is four points above the
32 percent record low in 2016, during the Donald Trump vs. Hillary Clinton battle. More than half of respondents
sound fed up: 29 percent of the public currently registers "not very much" trust and 34 percent say they
have "none at all."
What
the press is leaving out about the Arizona election audit. The ethical corruption of our national new media has extended to a degree that
once would have seemed unimaginable. We were exposed to yet another remarkable example with the reporting on the long-awaited audit of the 2020
presidential election results in Arizona. [...] While the audit did find that a hand-recount of all of the original ballots did widen Joe Biden's margin
by several hundred votes, the press deliberately and steadfastly ignored and left unreported the most critical results of the draft audit. Included
among those original ballots, the most comprehensive election audit ever conducted established the following:
• More than 23,000 mail-in votes were cast under voter IDs from people who should not have received their ballots by mail because they had moved.
• More than 10,000 voters cast ballots in more than one county.
• More than 9,000 mail-in ballots were returned and counted than had been mailed out of registered voters.
• Thousands of official results did not match those who voted, and thousands more were cast in-person in the name of those who had moved out of state.
• Logs and data files related to the election had been deliberately erased from the Election Management System (EMS) server, in violation of the law.
• Thousands of original ballots were duplicated more than once.
• Auditors were never provided with the required chain-of-custody documentation for the ballots, causing increased ambiguity regarding the accuracy of the election results.
• None of the various systems related to the election had numbers that would balance and agree with one another.
• Maricopa County officials actively interfered with the audit, withheld subpoena items, and refused to answer questions that are normally standard in such audits.
Outlets
That Poured Gas on Phony Border Patrol Story Forced to Correct Their Fake News. Mainstream media outlets are,
with egg on their face, issuing clarifications and corrections to their stories that falsely smeared Border Patrol agents who
were defending America's southern border for actions they didn't take using equipment they don't have. The timing makes
sense as attention strays again from the U.S.-Mexico border following an influx of some 15,000 illegal
immigrants — many of them Haitians who'd previously fled to South America — who set up a makeshift
"Bidenville" under the International Bridge in Del Rio, Texas. Despite the half-hearted mea culpas, their mission to
distract from the border crisis by creating a new boogeyman has already done its damage. The El Paso Times, one of
the original propagators of the phony story, issued a meek "clarification," rather than a correction or retraction which would
have been more suited to the literal fake news that launched a national firestorm and triggered condemnation from the White
House that caused an investigation by the Department of Homeland Security.
The
Activist Media Has Done an Exemplary Job of Deceiving the American People on COVID-19. When it comes to the
COVID-19 pandemic, the activist media has performed masterfully. [...] Ever since it became apparent that the COVID-19
outbreak would be a serious issue, the Democrats and their close friends and allies in the activist media have been trying to
convince us that we're all gonna die slow, painful deaths after being infected. The press has been on a full-on crusade
to terrify the American people into abiding by lockdown orders and mask mandates. They used fear to make us more
amenable to government encroaching on our lives. [...] Since the government wants to push mandatory vaccines and use the
pandemic as an excuse to impose intrusive measures to control the populace, the activist media seeks to persuade the public
that this is all for their own good. It launched a whole persuasion campaign specifically designed to confuse and
terrify people into complying with the government.
Look
past the hand-waving, and you'll see a wide open Mexican border. Soon after Bill Melugin of Fox News began
beaming drone footage of the many thousands of Haitians gathered under the bridge in Del Rio, Texas, Biden's open borders
zealot in charge of DHS, Alejandro Mayorkas, ordered two nearby border checkpoints abandoned. The reason given was to
redirect those personnel to help process the Haitians. The media reported that those checkpoints had been "closed,"
leading the viewer to believe that traffic had been rerouted. But that was not the case. The fifty thousand
vehicles those checkpoints inspect during an average week continued to move through, only now no one was checking them
for drugs or trafficked humans. This happened while Mayorkas was giving a news conference under the Del Rio bridge,
insisting that the U.S. border was definitely "not open." In fact, the border in the Del Rio sector was wide open.
Russiagate, More Like Watergate.
CNN Chief Media Reporter Brian Stelter hopped on the set of Reliable Sources last weekend, and offered his take on Special
Counsel John Durham's recent indictment of former Perkins Coie attorney Michael Sussmann, calling Durham's probe a "total
bust." This was in the context of accusing other networks like Fox and OAN of a pattern of "lie, rinse, repeat." [...] A
long list of press figures — from Stelter's own CNN colleague and shameless intelligence community spokesclown
Natasha Bertrand, to reporters from The New Yorker, Time, MSNBC, Fortune, the Financial
Times, and especially Slate and The Atlantic — were witting or unwitting pawns in a scheme to
sell the public on a transparently moronic hoax, i.e. that Donald Trump's campaign was communicating mysterious digital
treason to Russia's Alfa Bank via a secret computer server. The story sounded absurd from the start, and was instantly
challenged by experts.
What
the New CDC Report on Unvaccinated Left Out. A newly published CDC study prompted the MSM to run headlines like
"New study finds unvaccinated are 11 times more likely to die from Covid, CDC says," "Unvaccinated people were 11 times
more likely to die of covid-19, CDC report finds," and "Unvaccinated People Are 11 Times More Likely To Die Of COVID-19, New
Research Finds." It surely looks scary if you read only those headlines. I was curious about what the report actually
says, and doesn't say. Below is what I found. [#1] The purpose of the report is for propaganda: The report
admits in its Discussion section that "the data assessed from 13 jurisdictions accounted for 25% of the U.S. population, and
therefore might not be generalizable." But it still suggests that "[t]he data might be helpful in communicating the real-time
impact of vaccines (e.g., persons not fully vaccinated having >10 times higher COVID-19 mortality risk) and guiding prevention
strategies, such as vaccination and nonpharmacologic interventions." No wonder the MSM outlets quickly spread this message around.
Sensational headline alert: There has been ONE CASE of measles reported. This is hardly worth reporting. Army
base hit with highly contagious disease as thousands of Afghan refugees flood into America. A case of measles
has been identified at Fort McCoy Army Base in Wisconsin as thousands of Afghan refugees are housed there temporarily while
they await resettlement in the United States. Fox News was able to view an internal government email on Sunday
[9/5/2021] that confirms a case of measles at Fort McCoy. "All those who had been in contact with the infected person
at base have been isolated, and post-exposure prophylaxis and inoculations are in process," the email stated.
The Masked Ball
of Cowardice. What's transpired since has been a predictable spiral into the abyss, aided and abetted at
virtually every stage by a media apparatus that has perpetuated the fraudulent lockdown narrative. The Chinese
government has financial stakes in almost every top media outlet and friends in corporations, universities, and
governments. Preexisting financial relationships with China led institutions to trust information from China, endorse
the CCP's narrative, and ultimately advocate for the global adoption of the CCP's policies. Owing to this combination
of naivete, groupthink, and outright corruption, scientists and journalists have been incorporating information from China
into their work as true, when in fact nearly every bit of information that has come from China with regard to the virus has
been a lie.
Shooter
opened fire on Miami Beach tourist, danced over body: witness. A Georgia man "randomly" shot and killed a
tourist in a Miami Beach restaurant and danced over his body as the man tried to protect his 1-year-old baby from the gunman,
reports said. Tamarius Blair Davis, 22, of Norcross, Georgia, was allegedly high on psychedelic mushrooms when he
opened fire on 21-year-old Dustin Wakefield at close range before he danced over his body in view of horrified onlookers
dining outdoors at La Cerveceria de Barrio on Miami Beach's famous Ocean Drive on Tuesday night [8/24/2021], witnesses and
police said. "After the shooting, he was dancing on top of the guy," a witness, who didn't want to be identified, told
CBS Miami.
The Editor says...
Why do reporters think blacks always shoot "randomly" selected white people? The selections are not random.
How
Data Manipulation Is Used to Support the Desired Narratives. Who uses data manipulation? Governments,
businesses (individual or entire industries as we constantly see in martial arts/self-defense), the media, and social
organizations with an agenda. These groups or organizations utilize information to create a narrative on a topic for a
specific reason, most often for their own benefit. The data itself could be entirely legitimate and authentic (though
it may not be). It's how it's spun that's important, and most people rarely dig deeper [...] Remember, data manipulation
has multiple benefits, and it's usually very subtle yet sudden. If it fits a person's narrative, they will often
support it. Even if it's different from the original source manipulating the data in the first place.
Covid
Disinformation: Post Reporter Tries to Make Mask Fanatics Seem Heroic. Sydney Page, in an "objective"
news piece, amplifies the opinion of a mother, Wendy, whose extreme opinions lack scientific evidence and logic. Page
does her best to make Wendy's opinion seem common when in reality it is an extreme position in response to a mask policy with
which many agree. The author's implicit assumptions and tacit agreement with the view she reports destroys her
credibility. [...] First, Page does not mention that Tennessee Holler is a far-left website that promotes its own
agenda by amplifying voices in favor of universal mask mandates and COVID vaccinations. This is missing context that
would allow the reader to understand that this is another issue campaign for a left-wing pressure group. Second, to say
that the mother's take has gone "viral" is Page's opinion stated as fact, though unsupported by evidence. To go "viral"
takes a bit more than 30,000 likes on a social media site. You can buy 30,000 likes on Twitter right now for about $360
for context.
Memphis
Media Reports 16 Year Old Dies Of COVID, Waits Until End Of Report To Inform He Was Fully Vaccinated. This is
FAKE news at its most dangerous. Memphis media has reported this week that a 16-year-old football player at Westwood
High School died from COVID-19 and pneumonia over the weekend. Sunday, the principal at Westwood High sent out an
automated message to students and parents about the death of Azorean Tatum but did not say how he died. SCS has not
released any details. Quintina Bucker said her son Azorean Tatum, who went by the name Zo, collapsed at school on
Aug. 13 and was taken to Baptist Children's Hospital, where he was diagnosed with COVID. Buckner admitted her
son, who had asthma, [and] was vaccinated. [Video clip]
Untruths
and consequences. To any sane person, it appears our elites and their media sycophants are engaging in an
unprecedented preposterous statement tournament. They must get up every day, snicker once or twice, and try to think of
the most ridiculous, least verifiable piece of ludicrous prevarication they can attempt to pass off as truth. And why
shouldn't they? A significant percentage of Americans seem willing to believe anything at all. So, President
Biden says there are no Americans trapped in Kabul. Alright, now tell us the one about the three bears. His Press
Secretary, Jen Psaki, says we need to get the military out of Afghanistan first, so we don't risk anyone getting hurt.
Yes, forget about the thousands of American civilians trapped in Kabul. Ignore the pictures of mothers throwing their
babies over fences. Um, Jen, we send our troops to places specifically to confront danger and instability... and often
to fight the bad guys. That's why, unlike civilians, they are armed to the teeth and wear body armor.
That's why they have attack helicopters, A-10 Warthogs, missiles, rocket launchers, grenades, and submachine guns. Or
used to, before the Biden administration decided to donate them to the Taliban.
'Case': Another semantic Trojan
Horse. In our new world of pandemic panic porn, it is important to remember that the word "case" is not a term of art. It is
not a medical term or a legal term. It is just another word with a broad meaning that has been commandeered by people who want to control you.
This seemingly innocuous word is being used as a blunt instrument to stampede you into doing what the globalist elites want you to do. It is
widely used when the media, Big Tech, and government experts (the "infomob") lie by omission. When you hear that there are x "new cases"
in any context, this should immediately prompt you to ask questions about the number:
• Are these just positive COVID tests?
• Are these hospitalized people?
• Are these people who are not sick at all?
• Are these re-testings of the same people who have to be tested daily to keep their jobs?
• Are these people with other medical conditions?
The infomob wants you to envision these "cases" as hospitalized people on respirators, gasping for breath. What if most of these are just
positive tests? If so, were these done with the PCR test? The fact is, the PCR test is so highly parameterizable that you can set it to
find whatever you want. This is one of the reasons the CDC has quit using it.
Phony
Doctor Starts To Laugh While Pretending To Cry About COVID Live During Newscast. A good crisis actor is hard to
find these days. That is what CBS found out during the evening news with Norah O'Donnell. This supposed doctor
who goes by the name of Mia Meyers starts out talking about how people need to take the Delta variant seriously because of
its transmissibility. She then starts into something about 'our children before launching into her crocodile tear
routine, which morphs into full-blown laughter. Fake news strikes out again! [Video clip]
Why Don't
They Believe Us? Imagine your confusion as the same people who spent three months telling you not only that
masks don't work, but that there are several reasons you shouldn't wear or purchase them, suddenly introduce mask
mandates. We're "following the science," they tell you. This seems to make little sense, but a pandemic is no
time for questions. [...] The same people who told you Brexit would never happen, that Trump would never win, that when he
did win it was because of Russian collusion but also because of racism, that you must follow lockdowns while they don't, that
masks don't work, that masks do work, that social justice protests during pandemic lockdowns are a form of "health
intervention," that ransacking African American communities in the name of fighting racism is a "mostly peaceful" form of
protest, that poor and underserved children locked out of shuttered schools are "still learning," that Jussie Smollett was a
victim of a hate crime, that men are toxic, that there is an infinite number of genders, that COVID couldn't have come from a
lab until maybe it did, that closing borders is racist until maybe it isn't, that you shouldn't take Trump's vaccine, that
you must take the vaccine developed during the Trump administration, that Andrew Cuomo is a great leader, that Andrew Cuomo
is a granny killer, that the number of COVID deaths is one thing and then another ... are the same people telling you now
that the vaccine is safe, that you must take it, and that if you don't, you will be a second-class citizen. Understand
vaccine hesitancy now?
Conservatives
are Obsessed With My Pillow Vote Fraud Conference, According to Obsessed News Networks. Funny how we only hear about dangerous threats from those
networks who declare them dangerous. Let's take a look over a list of items we are told are absolutes in our political landscape these days:
• Conservatives the country over are committed to The Big Lie.
• Donald Trump is blindly followed by every Republican.
• Qanon feeds the mindset of anybody who is right-of-center.
These truths are well known and perpetually broadcast, but there is a core foundational reality behind these maxims. The subjects in each of these
entries is followed more intently and the information is disseminated to the populace with far more energy by the mainstream press industry. It is
interesting that while I am supposedly obsessed with President Trump I learn about his opinions and activities mostly through journalists. While I
get accused of fostering the push of denying the 2020 election results I only hear instructions on the matter via CNN and MSNBC, and as someone allegedly
transfixed by Qanon's dictates I only ever hear about the directives from this nebulous source from clips of Brian Stelter and Chris Hayes.
Are
These Stories Real? Or Are the Media Trying to Overcome 'Vaccine Hesitancy' by Using Fear Porn? [Scroll
down beyond the highly dubious anecdote.] On the whole, I'd take my chances on my own rather than to submit to the tender
mercies of someone who obviously holds me in contempt. I have some questions about the entire story. For
instance, according to the CDC, there has not been a single COVID-related death in Alabama under 40 in over a month.
There have only been 110 such deaths in Alabama since the pandemic started. There is no public data, so far as I can
find, that gives the number of intubated patients, the number of patients in the ICU by age, etc., since the vaccine became
available. The absence of empirical data to back up undocumented anecdotes doesn't give me great confidence in the
story. And the source is a Facebook post.
Mollie
Hemingway: Partisan Hearings Taking Jan. 6 Riot Out Of Context Are A "Joke". Mollie Hemingway made the
case Sunday [8/1/2021] on FNC's "MediaBuzz" that the January 6 Capitol riot committee hearings are being held by partisan
Democrats who are taking events out of the wider context of escalating political violence in 2020. ["]If you want
to talk about consistency, you have to deal with the fact that we have a political party that embraced a movement to defund
the police for an entire year and now we're pretending that they care so much about the police. [...] The defund the police
movement, which the media and other Democratic partisans strongly celebrated, which was supported across the country by
Democratic politicians, was something we saw in the past year.["]
Here is an example of tabloid sensationalism. Three
Americans create enough carbon emissions to kill one person, study finds. The lifestyles of around three
average Americans will create enough planet-heating emissions to kill one person, and the emissions from a single coal-fired
power plant are likely to result in more than 900 deaths, according to the first analysis to calculate the mortal cost of
carbon emissions. The new research builds upon what is known as the "social cost of carbon", a monetary figure placed
upon the damage caused by each ton of carbon dioxide emissions, by assigning an expected death toll from the emissions that
cause the climate crisis. The analysis draws upon several public health studies to conclude that for every 4,434 metric
tons of CO2 pumped into the atmosphere beyond the 2020 rate of emissions, one person globally will die prematurely from the
increased temperature. This additional CO2 is equivalent to the current lifetime emissions of 3.5 Americans.
The Editor says...
Carbon dioxide is not carbon, nor is it a lethal pollutant, in the quantities seen in ordinary air. With the exception
of coal mine accidents, volcanic eruptions, or extremely
rare events like this one, nobody dies from
inhaling carbon dioxide. You will likely never see a death certificate that lists inhalation of second-hand CO2 as
the cause of death. Carbon monoxide is poisonous, but carbon monoxide is not carbon dioxide. Follow the science!
Unrestricted
Mass Border Invasion Continues. The head for the Rio Grand Valley (RGV) sector of the U.S. Border Patrol, Brian
Hastings, sent an alarming tweet message earlier today [7/25/2021]. According to Hastings: "It's the hottest part of
the summer and apprehensions are skyrocketing! USBP Apprehensions surpassed the 1-million milestone in June. NOW,
this week alone, #RGV has apprehended more than 20K illegally present migrants." One million illegal aliens walk into
the country while Joe Biden claims to be concerned about the spread of COVID-19?
The Editor says...
Another million illegal aliens walked into the country, yet the total number of illegal aliens (reported by the news media)
remains a constant 11 million. It never increases.
The Antifa/FBI
Coalition. Over two dozen people were killed during the Antifa and BLM protests in 2020. It is routinely
reported that "five people died as a result" of the Jan. 6 disturbance. This is a totally accurate statement, however,
it is still misleading. Only one of the deceased died as a result of violence. She was actually murdered by a
government official. Relating these deaths allows the media to routinely describe Jan. 6 as a "deadly insurrection"
as opposed to the "mostly peaceful" protests by Antifa and BLM.
A
reporter lies about Trump's statement regarding vaccines. My mantra for some time now has been that there was
nothing "abnormal" about Trump's presidency. Since Trump has left the White House, it's become patently clear that the
abnormality during the Trump years came entirely from the Democrats and their media operatives, with support from the Vichy
Republicans. [...] But the Trump haters were relentless and, as if to prove that the sickness was all theirs, on Sunday
[7/18/2021] one of them instantly and proudly perverted Trump's words to claim that he was anti-vaccine. Remember,
please, that Trump was the one who pushed aside regulations and freed up money so that there was a vaccine within less than a
year of COVID's appearance in America. It was also Trump who began the vaccine program with assistance from the
military, which is very good at processing vast numbers of people. Since he left the White House, Trump has watched the
Biden administration make a complete hash of the program.
The contempt and loss of
trust people harbor for the corporate media is completely justified and well-earned. [Thread reader] The
part of the media that feigns anger at misinformation is uncritically promoting a story today by Luke Harding that Russia was
blackmailing Trump — the same Harding who has published many false stories, championed the Steele Dossier and
claimed Trump was long a Russian agent. It was Harding who published was one of the most sensationalized stories of the
Trump era: that Manafort repeatedly met Assange in the Ecuadorian Embassy. It was utterly fabricated. Everyone
knows it's [false], never happened. Yet the Guardian has never corrected or retracted it[.] Now suddenly, Harding
claims he obtained leaked, highly sensitive Kremlin documents that just so happen to prove all the lies he's been peddling
for years, that not even Mueller's huge team found. Because it advances liberals' interests, journalists are
uncritically spreading it.
The Democrats'
Topsy-Turvy Spin Machine. Everything appears to be topsy-turvy: the chairman of the joint chiefs and the
chairman of the American Federation of Teachers, Randi Weingarten, made almost identical statements about critical race
theory. The Democrats now claim the Republicans are the ones who wished to defund the police, and now they suddenly
have discovered the virtue of voter identification, which, up until yesterday, they had been shrieking from the roof-tops was
tantamount to the restoration of slavery. Apparently, it's not Jim Crow after all. The media are so absurdly
partisan they will try to allow the Democrats a free pass across the barricades on those issues. But the accumulating
disasters for the Biden Administration will not be entirely absorbed by the (agonizingly slow) return to work of Americans
after COVID and the miracle of the Warp Speed vaccine development, (for which Trump must receive no credit). The media can't
cover for this "Gong Show" administration indefinitely, but I must admit they have lasted longer than I expected, given their
invertebrate response to almost everything else.
MSNBC
Agrees With Radical Race-Baiter: GOP Wants 'American Apartheid'. In [the] wake of President Biden
huddling, on Thursday [7/8/2021], with radical left-wing activists who pretend to be "civil rights leaders," MSNBC on Friday [7/9/2021]
touted National Urban League President Marc Morial coming out after that meeting and hurling the vile accusation that
Republican-sponsored voting reforms and the U.S. Supreme Court were conspiring to create "American apartheid." Rather than
fact-check such a horrendous lie, the partisan cable channel endorsed the disgusting rhetoric instead. "Civil rights
leaders gathering with President Biden....We know they want more action on federal voting rights," anchor Chris Jansing
announced while filling in for Stephanie Ruhle in the 9:00 a.m. ET hour. She eagerly pointed out that "all of
this is happening after the Supreme Court upheld Arizona voting restrictions and the president of the Urban League, Marc
Morial, talked about that after the meeting at the White House."
Democrats
Can't Stem the Flow of Revelations No Matter How Hard They Try. Virtually every legacy media story about the
2020 election includes the phrase "baseless claims of voter fraud" in disparaging President Trump and anyone else who dares
to point out the need for full forensic audits to sort out the mountain of election irregularities that continue to be
uncovered. It reminds me of the endless repetition of the word "gravitas" during the 2000 presidential campaign, as the
Democrat-media agitprop worked overtime to disparage George W. Bush. Check out the DuckDuckGo search results for
"baseless claims of voter fraud" below. The leftwing and legacy media are good at repeating Democrat narratives; after
all, most of them are Democrats (or at least vote Democrat).
Biden
Does Not Need A Domestic "Terrorism" Agenda Unless He Is About To Violate American Rights. One of Joe Biden's
first actions upon entering the White House was to initiate a 100 day review of the government's domestic terrorism policies,
and I think this says a lot about what path his presidency is bound to follow. Yes, the media continually argues that
the Capitol protest on Jan 6th was a vast conspiracy on the part of conservatives to "overthrow" the democratic process and
commit insurrection. In fact, all it really amounted to was a large protest which was less violent than the majority of
Black Lives Matter protests across the nation over the past year. The media also incessantly mentions the five deaths
that occurred on the day of the protest while continuing to ignore the fact that NOT ONE of those deaths has been attributed
to the direct actions of protesters, and at least three of the deaths were due to natural causes. Why does the mainstream
media keep lying by omission? Because they have to keep the narrative alive that the capitol protest is a sign of some
underlying conservative "evil" that must be contained or destroyed. We don't really give them much to work with, so they
have to create reasons out of thin air to convince people to hate us.
"Trigger"
is being canceled because it triggers. [Scroll down] The media often refer to groups they like as
"communities." As in the "gay community" and the "black community" and alphabet groups such as "LGBTQ community."
They could instead simply refer to "gays" and "blacks" and "LGBTQs" but they gratuitously add the word "community" because they
like the nice connotation. As an aside, the media's lumping of the members of this or that group together as a "community"
suggests that the members all think the same. But to the media, that's OK, so long as the sameness in their thinking is
media-approved. Meaning they are all thinking like the media thinks — like leftists. As you learned a
few paragraphs ago, diversity in viewpoints is bad. And so the media will tell you that the "gay community" hates
Republicans (hate is now OK, so long as it's directed at Republicans, because Republicans are hateful) as if gay Republicans
don't exist. Here's my bigger, trigger point. Notice that they never use "community" in connection with groups they
dislike, some of which are truly and consciously communal. They never mention the "Christian community" or even the
"church-going community." And you'll never hear them mention the "gun-owner community" or the "hunter community" or
the "gay Republican community." Nope, the word "community" carries good connotations which the media reserves for
groups it deems good.
You've
got to be kidding: WaPo lavishes credit on Biden for recovering economy. This post would be more
appropriate in the Babylon Bee as satire, as journalists and the Biden administration collude to rewrite history to give
Biden the credit for the economic recovery that was well underway because of Trump and red states before Biden took
office. Even though the vaccines were developed so fast because of Trump and one million shots were being given each
day prior to Biden taking office, the Democrat talking points regurgitated by most of the media say there was not a
distribution plan prior to Biden taking office. It is pretty [...] amazing that one million doses were already being
given and tens of millions more were in the pipeline when supposedly the Trump administration had no plan.
Subterranean Homesick Blues 2021.
Some guy using the handle Cultural Husbandry had a string of tweets about the media's string of lies. [For example,]
Epstein committed suicide
McAfee committed suicide
Biden won the election
COVID came from a wet market
Conservatives are all terrorists
Ivermectin doesn't work
HCQ doesn't work
Biden doesn't have dementia
The jab isn't making anyone ill
Fauci was consistent
Masks work
Cuomo didn't kill old people
Dominion systems were secure
Hunter Biden is an artist
Trump colluded with Russia
Jan 06 was an insurrection
Transwomen are real women
BLM is mostly peaceful [...]
We have got to win the White House back. And this time, fire every political appointee on Inauguration Day, and ditch everybody above
a one-star general or admiral. And then shrink the central government — including the Milley-ized Military — to the point where
a presidential election is less important than a soccer game. And readers know how little I care about soccer.
If covid 19 taught us anything, it is that the government is too big, too powerful, and too stupid to protect America.
Controlling
the World Is Easy. [Scroll down] Whenever you heard raw numbers of cases, hospitalizations, or deaths it
was because those numbers were bad. When they weren't so bad, you started hearing percentages. Why? Because
certain ways of presenting information can make it seem better or worse than it really is. [...] Going from 10,000 deaths per
day to 20,000 deaths per day is a 100 percent increase in the number of deaths. So is going from 1 death per day
to 2 deaths per day. If you want to scare [...] people in the hope that they continue watching your news program, you
headline the story with, "There has been a stunning, 100 percent increase in the number of COVID deaths in just 24 hours."
You're not lying, it's an accurate statement. It's just presented in an absolutely fraudulent way to manipulate the
audience. That's what so much of what the left does has become.
Disclosure:
The Four "Swedes" in Custody For Gang Rape Are Somali Citizens. Ostentatious headlines in Aftonbladet,
Expressen and other media declared that "six Swedes", later "eight Swedes" had been arrested for a rough gang rape on a
Finland ferry. Nya Tider is now the first newspaper to reveal that not even the white lie that the arrested Somalis are
"Swedish citizens" is right — all the detainees are Somali citizens, and of all the suspects only one has a
Swedish citizenship.
Fox
News's Chris Wallace accuses Republicans of being the party that is defunding the police. "Fox News Sunday"
host Chris Wallace pushed Republican Study Committee Chair Rep. Jim Banks on the Democratic issue of defunding police
departments, suggesting that the Indiana lawmaker's party was actually responsible for cutting funds to law enforcement.
During a segment on rising crime in U.S. cities, Banks appeared after former Rep. Cedric Richmond (D-La.), now a senior
adviser to President Joe Biden, who blamed Republicans for "defunding" police by failing to support what amounted to a
$350 billion bailout for poorly-run blue cities that suffered additional economic distress during the COVID-19 pandemic
due to extensive, prolonged shutdowns.
The
Not-So-Great American Pastime. [Scroll down] Perhaps the easiest example of pretending is CNN. It
pretends to be a news organization, a reliable source, journalistic in its approach. Its sillier sister, MSNBC, at
least affords viewers some respect by delivering its preposterous daily scripts via personalities so cartoonish in visage,
voice and delivery that one cottons on rather quickly to the schtick — propagandizing, after all, differs from
pretending. Both networks amount to 24/7 televangelism for leftist doctrine, but CNN folk are obvious hypocrites, while
MSNBC's on-air personalities seem to be actually insane. The executives at each of these cultural ministries are
culpable of Felony Pretending, while their audiences are essentially accomplices after the fact.
Rep.
Nunes: Republicans Shouldn't Talk to Mainstream Media. Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) claimed that
95 percent of media are the propaganda arm of the Democratic Party and urged Republicans to stop talking to them or going on TV
with them. "I still — for the life of me — can't understand why Republicans talk to 95 percent of
the media, which is fake news," Nunes told Alex Marlow [...] on Wednesday [6/16/2021]. "But look, fake news isn't the proper
term. It's the propaganda arm of the Democrat Socialist Party. That's what it is," Nunes said. Former President
Donald Trump has repeatedly called mainstream media "fake news." "So it's no different than the Chinese Communist
Party — it's the propaganda they put out. [It's] no different than what the Soviet Union did with the old
Pravda media. And it's, quite frankly, no different than how Putin controls the media today, where 95 percent of his
media in Russia is propaganda for the Putin regime," Nunes continued.
Former
Trump Official Slices Fauci Apart Over Hydroxychloroquine Fiasco. Donald Trump scored a major win over the
liberal media. [...] Hydroxychloroquine has finally been proven as an effective treatment for COVID. Russian collusion
was a hoax. The Russian bounty story in Afghanistan was another whopper. Lafayette Square was not cleared for a
photo op. And Hunter Biden's laptop is real. The hydroxychloroquine one is significant since it was weaponized
heavily against the Trump administration. The president was trying to save lives and all the media did was attack
him. It's why they're the opposition press. And Dr. Anthony Fauci's refusal to endorse the treatment caused
thousands of unnecessary deaths. That's the allegation that Peter Navarro, Trump's director for now-defunct Office of
Trade and Manufacturing Policy, said he had around 60 million tablets of this stuff that could have been used to treat
some 5-6 million patients. Fauci refused to budge.
My Top 10 media lies.
No. 1 is the oldest and biggest: Trump colluded with Russia to win in 2016 and might be a Russian agent. That
scam involved crooked FBI agents and led to the appointment of Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who took two years to conclude
there was no evidence to back the charge. [...] Remember Lie No. 2, the "Muslim ban" that wasn't? Or No. 3, the mantra
that the 2017 tax cuts were only for the "rich" despite studies showing 80 percent of the population benefitted? How about
the "kids in cages" firestorm, complete with gripping photographs of migrant children in metal containers? That was Lie
No. 4 and the hottest story going, with Democrats such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez rushing to the border with photogenic
outrage. They vanished when it was revealed the Obama-Biden administration built the cages and the heart-wrenching photos
were from 2014. Apologies, corrections and retractions came in bunches, right? You must be kidding. Big media
and big tech are too big to admit error.
The
State of Black America. Listening to all the rhetoric in the popular media, you would think America is the most
unfair, racist nation in the world. You would think that black Americans are uniformly living in oppression and
poverty, with no hope for the future, save the federal government arriving on the scene to their rescue. Sorry,
liberals, to trouble you with facts. But indeed there are facts. And the facts tell a far different story than
what we are hearing. Let's start with the most recent annual report of the Census Bureau: Income and Poverty in
the United States: 2019. According to this report, annual real median household income in the U.S. increased 6.8%
in 2019, the largest annual increase recorded by the Census Bureau going back to 1967. Black median household income in
2019 increased 7.9%, the largest on record and, per American Enterprise Institute economist Mark Perry, "almost nine times
the average annual increase of 0.90% over the last half-century."
The Editor says...
Hmmm... Who was the President in 2019, when blacks were doing so well?
Media
Caught In Yet Another Massive Anti-Trump Lie; Will Election Fraud Be Next? More than a year after the events at
Lafayette Square happened, and after endless media claims that President Donald Trump had peaceful protesters forcibly
cleared for a photo op, we finally know the truth. Trump was right. The media were lying. And anyone who
trusted the news accounts was a fool. It's enough to make us start to wonder why anyone should trust the media's
insistence that there was no widespread fraud in the 2020 election. Yesterday, the Interior Department's inspector
general released a report about what actually happened in Lafayette Square on June 1, 2020.
When
"Fake News" Is Actually Fake. In the last 24 hours, we've seen what a complete shambles the mainstream media
have become. First up, someone at the New York Times was formatting a fake story about watermelons on Mars —
perhaps this was a training exercise for a new employee? — but somehow managed to press the "publish" button, and
this appeared on the Times website: [...] But wait — there's more! At yesterday's presser for Vice President
Harris in Mexico, a Univision reporter got up and slobbered all over the VP. The Media Research Center has the story,
and here's the relevant part of the transcript: [...] There's only one problem: Univision says Maria Fernanda doesn't
work for Univision. Univision issued multiple statements distancing themselves from Fernanda.
Father Biden Celebrates
Mass(Acre). The press did its part to help usher in Tulsa Massacre Day, running breathless stories with
inflated casualty figures ("300 black dead! No, 3,000! Wait, make that 30,000!"), always being careful to avoid
mentioning the white dead or the fact that the authorities pretty much had the situation under control until the armed black
mob showed up (most historians agree that it was a black who fired the first shot). And although airplanes were indeed
used in the course of the riot for observation of crowds and fires, the press added — unchallenged —
lurid and questionable accounts of planes dropping bombs on blacks, blitzkrieg-style (in fact, the only offensive use of a
plane during the riots was when a white pilot flew over the black part of town dragging a banner depicting a massively
overweight white woman, hoping it would make the blacks look up and stare long enough to be disarmed). Of course, the
good news — trumpeted by Biden during his speech — is that black Tulsa was rebuilt, and today the
community is stronger than ever at almost 16% of the city. Not mentioned by the president was that the city also has
one of the worst crime rates in the U.S., hitting a three-decade high in 2020, a year in which far more Tulsa blacks died due
to homicide than in 1921 due to the riot. But don't worry; no one will call that a "massacre."
The
Media's Wuhan Lab Scandal Looks Worse and Worse. You'd think that after the Covington kids disaster and the
Steele dossier calamity the American news media would get the message. Which is to say, report facts, not liberal
narratives. But of course, ain't happening. [...] Trump Derangement Syndrome is a disease that continues to
amaze. Otherwise rational people — journalists in this case — are so consumed with TDS that they
quite voluntarily throw any semblance of standards over the side to guarantee their anti-Trump bona fides with their also-TDS
infected liberal media colleagues. The Covington kids were racist! Liberal media heads nod in unison, eventually
brought to the realization — not coincidentally helped by lawsuits — that there was zero truth to their
carefully structured narrative of arrogant white kids tormenting an aging Native American.
Facebook's
Speech Suppression Argues for Repeal of Section 230 and a Facebook Stock Price of Zero. A lot of people have
egg on their face for dismissing the COVID-19 lab-leak theory. As ABC News's Jonathan Karl said this week. "Some
things may be true even if Donald Trump said them." Or if Arkansas Sen. Tom Cotton said them. "We still don't
know where coronavirus originated," Cotton said in January 2020. "Could have been a market, a farm, a food processing
company. I would note that Wuhan has China's only biosafety level-four super laboratory that works with the world's
most deadly pathogens to include, yes, coronavirus." Cotton never said he was certain the virus came from a lab leak and
never suggested a leak would have been deliberate. But as a Trump supporter, he was quickly smeared, as liberal writer
Matthew Yglesias shows in a painstaking analysis, for pushing "conspiracy theories" (CBS News), "spreading rumors that were
easily debunked" (Politico), "repeating a coronavirus conspiracy theory that was already debunked" (Washington Post), and
"repeat[ing] fringe theory of coronavirus origins" (New York Times). In each case, Yglesias points out, writers
mischaracterized what Cotton actually said.
Another
Deranged Trump Vengeance Fantasy from Vanity Fair. It takes no great imagination to determine what is probably
the focus of the mind of Vanity Fair's Bess Levin. Even a quick perusal of her articles over the past year
reveals her disturbing obsession with Donald Trump 24/7. So obsessed is Levin with Trump that she will even lie in her
articles to make up fake quotes about him such as her March 8 screed in which she put a false quote in Lindsay Graham's mouth
where he supposedly said, "I'm willing to overlook the fact that Trump has probably beaten a few homeless people to death."
Most responsible periodicals would have said "no" and maybe had her checked by a therapist. The fact that she remains
employed at Vanity Fair says something about the ethics that magazine.
Transgender
Censorship: USA Today Erases 'Hurtful' Words From Female Athlete's Op-Ed. On Saturday [5/22/2021],
USA Today published an op-ed written by Chelsea Mitchell, one of three female athletes at the center of a legal
challenge to Connecticut's unfair transgender rules that allow biological males to compete against females in women's
sports. Apparently facing some backlash a few days after publication, USA Today altered Mitchell's words
and claimed that she had used "hurtful language." On Tuesday, USA Today slapped an "Editor's Note" at the
top of the article. The note reads, "This column has been updated to reflect USA TODAY's standards and style
guidelines. We regret that hurtful language was used." What language was so "hurtful" that USA Today
altered it three days after publication? The publication removed every mention of the biological term "male" and
replaced it with the indeterminate word "transgender."
Fact-checking
the fact-checkers. It is time for the news business to admit that "fact-checking" is a tiresome, misleading,
and dishonest blight on actual reporting. It hardly existed in Fleet Street when I left Britain in 1997. Checking facts
was understood to be the core of a reporter's job, not something sloughed off to someone else. Perhaps this was because
British education was mostly essay writing, not checking multiple-choice boxes. Students quickly learn to write fluently
when faced with blank sheets of foolscap and limited time to fill them. Quality obviously varied, but educated people
were assumed to be capable of coherent composition. The residual challenge was knowing the facts or, in the case of
reporters, finding them out. So, it was startling at first to encounter America's bifurcated system, in which
"fact-checkers" monitor reporters like gamekeepers trying to catch poachers. And it's far worse now than it was back
then. Fact-checking has grown beyond recognition in the past 25 years and chokes the news business like a
parasitic vine.
The Covid Lab Leak went
from terrible, racist conspiracy theory to plausible overnight for the mainstream media. [Thread reader]
If you don't believe me, look at these stories side-by-side, then vs. now. You may remember that much of the really bad
coverage was focused on @SenTomCotton's suggestion that we better understand the potential for a lab leak from Wuhan. The
difference in framing here from @nytimes between May 2020 and May 2021 is... stark. [Illustrations] But it wasn't
just NYT. There's a lot of ammo from @CNN, too. Not even two months ago, they ran a piece writing off the lab leak
theory as "like something out of a comic book." Yesterday, the tone had changed, without any reference to their own role in
the previous debate. [Illustrations] But if you go back further, @CNN's coverage gets even worse. Early in
2020, they ran CCP talking points suggesting it was all a political tactic based on "disinformation."
Don't let the media
get away with U-turning on the lab leak theory. The theory that COVID-19 originated in a Chinese laboratory has
completed its year-long trudge — from fringe nutjob idea to mainstream and expert-approved opinion. Leading
scientists and epidemiologists such as none other than Dr Anthony Fauci were so quick to dismiss the 'lab talk'. It was first
portrayed as a hare-brained wild and tacitly racist conspiracy theory driven by paranoid Republican senators and fever-dream
right-wing media. Now it is seen as not only an acceptable theory worth more study, but one that has broken through
into the mainstream. This has happened in a matter of days. Where does Sen. Tom Cotton go for his apology?
Interestingly enough, the lab leak theory started gaining more traction — not only in the international community,
but in the scientific community in the United States — right around the same time that questions of United States
government funding of EcoHealth Alliance, a research and collection group of bat coronaviruses in China, may have lead to
gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Will the 2020 Madness
Last? Before 2020, the American people tired of the media farces surrounding such events as the Duke lacrosse
team, the lies about the Covington kids, and Jussie Smollett's hoax about being attacked by white racists. Will they
return to their earlier skepticism about media hype when it increasingly seems like the media and the government mostly lied
when denying the possibility that the coronavirus leaked from a Wuhan lab engaged in "gain-of-function" engineering of
dangerous viruses?
Exactly
How Corporate Media Launders Opinion To Attack Inconvenient People And Facts. A New York Times business
correspondent in Hong Kong, a weekend editor at The Guardian who lives in New York, a British Business Insider reporter with
a focus on the Saudis, and the executive editor of The Daily Beast. A 48-year-old blogger who works for Rachel Maddow,
a union activist who covers "extremism, far-right politics and media disinformation" for The Huffington Post, and the 29-year
editor of the Arkansas Times. A breaking news reporter at The Washington Post who wrapped up her most recent internship
in May 2016, a 2016 University of Pennsylvania graduate who covers "young people doing big things" for Forbes, a 45-year-old
former George Will intern who writes for CNN, and David Frum. What do these people have in common, aside from their
political ideology? Every one of them is a part of a machine that launders smears and opinions through newspapers,
magazines, and television channels, presents the cleaned-up product as unimpeachable truth to the public, and then uses the
fresh-minted facts to protect friends and hurt enemies. It's called "the news," and here's how it worked for Arkansas'
Sen. Tom Cotton's completely plausible theory that COVID-19 came from a Chinese lab.
Cruz
Decimates Brian Williams After He Goes Full Dem Operative on Him. Folks on the left have been freaking out at
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) for criticizing the "woke ad" put out by the military. [...] CNN's Jake Tapper even pushed the
garbage that Cruz was spreading "Russian propaganda," as we reported earlier. CNN once again showing their "objective
reporting." But even Tapper wasn't as bad as MSNBC's Brian Williams. Again, remember, Brian Williams is promoted
as an objective journalist. But he's hardly that. Here was his response to Cruz's remarks, giving him the
nickname "Kremlin Cruz." [Tweet] How is that journalism? Or even close to being an accurate description of
what Cruz was saying? They know his point; they simply choose to twist it to attack him. It's not news, but
flat-out bias, acting like a Democratic operative. Now, let's remember these are the folks who spread Russian
disinformation for the past four years to try to delegitimize the duly elected American president.
LA
Times slammed for article praising lockdowns and downplaying effect on economy. The Los Angeles
Times was slammed Wednesday [5/19/2021] over a business column claiming coronavirus lockdowns saved lives without harming
the economy. The column, titled "The evidence is clear — COVID lockdowns saved lives without harming
economies," cited published data and concluded "lockdowns played a significant role in reducing infection rates" and "had a
very modest role in producing economic damage." In the article, Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Michael Hiltzik
criticized red-state governors like Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis for opposing lockdowns. He also suggested that
California's stringent lockdowns are the reason why the state now "boasts among the lowest case, hospitalization and death
rates in the nation, as well as a recovering economy."
LA
Times Op-Ed: The Evidence Is Clear... The Lockdowns Didn't Trash the Economy. Whoever wrote this is on
bath salts. Is this for real? I mean I know media bubbles are dense, but this is something else. This is
not even grounded in reality, folks Apparently, the COVID lockdowns didn't trash the economy and it saved lives. Both
are demonstrably false. That's the hottest of hot takes regarding the virus. Dare I say, it may be worse than
what Anthony Fauci has said about the vaccine and mask-wearing. It could rival that, maybe. The fact is that
millions of jobs were lost, mental health issues spiked, our children weren't learning, people did die, and the lockdowns
didn't do anything to stem that. It's an airborne virus. It was going to spread no matter what and what we've
learned is that staying locked up inside was probably the worst thing for people to do.
Let's
Talk About Reporting in War Zones. The AP reporters certainly knew they had Hamas neighbors. [...] Terror
groups use human shields, and the press apparently volunteers to shield them. Here's the thing: There's nothing
surprising about Western press organizations making arrangements with terror regimes. It happens all the time in the
Middle East. CNN refrained from reporting on Saddam Hussein's atrocities in Iraq in order to keep its office in Baghdad
open. The New York Times famously led a tour group to the Islamic Republic of Iran. This situation is even
more overt and obvious in Gaza. The only reason a press outfit like the AP has to open a bureau there is to cover
Hamas, but it's never been interested in reporting on how the group stores missiles in homes, schools, and hospitals, or on
how little of the money it receives from Tehran goes to building civilian infrastructure or responsible governance.
That's because the only story Hamas wants coming out of Gaza is about the fundamental evil of the Zionist entity.
Propaganda
War, Maricopa Board of Supervisors Leaks Senate Letter to Media Before Sending [it] to [the] Arizona Senate.
Earlier today [5/17/2021] Arizona GOP Chairwoman Kelli Ward noted the Maricopa Board of Supervisors (BoS) was engaging in a
propaganda war against the people of Arizona and the State Senate. It didn't take long for evidence to surface.
The Board of Supervisors [sent] the media a copy of the 13-page letter they claim to have sent to the Arizona Senate.
However, AZ Senate President Karen Fann has never even see the letter. The BoS sent the letter to the media before they
sent it to the AZ Senate. Yeah, propaganda.
USA Today Editorial
Says Republicans Are Bigger Threat Than 9/11 Hijackers After Cheney Ouster. Rep. Liz Cheney's ouster
proved Republicans are a bigger threat than the 9/11 hijackers who killed thousands of Americans, according to a USA Today
editorial. The removal of Cheney from her leadership position suggests that the GOP has endorsed election fraud
conspiracy theories, USA Today editor David Mastio wrote in a Thursday editorial. Endorsing such conspiracy theories,
which allege that President Joe Biden didn't actually win the election, poses a bigger threat to the U.S. than 9/11 hijackers
ever did, he said. "The fact that the majority of Republicans believe our election was stolen is a sure sign that more
violence is to come," Mastio wrote, according to USA Today.
How
the New York Times has published lies to serve a biased narrative. On April 15, the Biden administration
acknowledged there was no evidence that Russia ever offered bounties on American troops in Afghanistan, walking back a report
that wounded former President Donald Trump in the run-up to the 2020 election. Four days later, the Washington, DC,
medical examiner revealed that Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick had not been murdered by rampaging Trump supporters
during the Jan. 6 Capitol Hill riot, as reports had claimed, but had died of natural causes. Both stories were based on
anonymous, unidentifiable sources, but had become deeply enmeshed in the public consciousness. Both confirmed the
assumptions of the nation's left-leaning media and academic elite, while damaging their political enemies. And both
were driven by The New York Times, where malicious misreporting has been the practice for a century, argues journalist and
media commentator Ashley Rindsberg.
The
Incredible Vanishing Flu. Seasonal influenza, also known as "the flu," visits America every year, similar to
tornados, thunderstorms, heat waves, and snowstorms. As tracked by the CDC, over the past decade symptomatic flu cases
ranged from 9 to 45 million cases per year in the US. Hospitalizations varied from 140 to 810 thousand,
and deaths from 12 to 61 thousand, depending on the particular year, strain of influenza, and effectiveness of the vaccine.
This year, "flu activity is unusually low at this time" according to CDC surveillance. Since late September 2020, they recorded
only about 2000 cases, a minute fraction of the tens of millions of cases in past years. Hospitalizations this flu season
are minimal with only 224 confirmed influenza hospitalizations from September 2020 to mid-April 202, nowhere near the hundreds of
thousands of hospitalizations in past seasons.
Hey,
LA Times — Don't Tread on Hillsdale College. On April 23, Julie Appleby, a senior correspondent with
the Kaiser Health News network, published a piece in the Los Angeles Times headlined, "Michigan's Outbreak Worries
Scientists. Will Conservative Outposts Keep Pandemic Rolling?" implying that both the sleepy Michigan town where I
live, and the college I attend, are biohazards: [...] Appleby needs to choose. Is Hillsdale bad because it "jumped the
line" to distribute unused vaccines or is it evil because it isn't properly concerned about the illness? She won't, of
course. Her obsession with a college in a region of the country where she has no obvious connection belabors a more
deep-rooted hatred. Appleby's "reporting" isn't a good-faith criticism but an attempt to call down the Eye of Soros on
her political enemies. She wants to destroy the way of life my neighbors and I enjoy.
Corporate News
Outlets Again "Confirm" the Same False Story, While Many Refuse to Correct it. One of the primary plagues of
corporate journalism, which I have documented more times than I can count, just reared its ugly head again to deceive
millions of people with fake news. When one large news outlet publishes a false story based on whispers from anonymous
security state agents with the CIA or FBI, other news outlets quickly purport that they have "independently confirmed" the
false story, in order to bolster its credibility (oh, it must be true since other outlets have also confirmed it).
This is an obvious scam — they have not "independently confirmed" anything but rather merely acted as servants to
the same lying security state agents who planted the original false story — but they do it over and over, creating
the deceitful perception that a fake story has been "confirmed" by multiple outlets, thus bolstering its credibility in the
public mind. It was the favored tactic for spreading debunked Russiagate frauds and is still used. One of the
most vivid examples occurred in December, 2017, when CNN falsely reported what it hyped as "a major bombshell": that
Donald Trump, Jr. had advance access to the WikiLeaks archive. Within an hour, NBC News' Ken Dilanian and CBS News both
claimed they had "independently confirmed" this fairy tale. When it turned out that it was a complete lie, all based on
a false date on an email to Trump Jr., these outlets embarrassingly corrected it hours later and then simply moved on as if
it never happened, never explaining how multiple outlets could possibly have all "independently confirmed" the same blatant
falsehood.
The
Giuliani Walk Back Gets Worse and Exposes Collusion in Mainstream Press. The fact that the news organizations
are working in tandem on narratives blows up in their hands. It was another example of an important news outlet having
to retract a major news story, as Bonchie reported yesterday, when The Washington Post had to retract its prior claim
that both Rudy Giuliani and the news network One America News had been informed by the FBI that they had part of a
Russian disinformation campaign. "This version has been corrected to remove assertions that OAN and Giuliani received
the warnings," the outlet says in part of its retraction.
Fake
News Still Gaslighting America with Phony Polls. Opinion polls, particularly in the buildup to a presidential
election, are not designed to reflect public opinion, but instead to shape it. For the media, objectivity is only of
historic interest, a journalistic tenet from a bygone era. Now most of the media is embedded within the Democrat party,
serving as an advocacy arm or political action committee to influence elections and agendas. A CNN staffer, who bragged
that he was "one step down" from a director, admitted to an undercover Tinder date, actually a real journalist working for
James O'Keefe's Project Veritas, that CNN was "creating a story" that "we didn't know anything about," calling it
"propaganda" to help remove President Trump from office. The epitome of fake news. Fake news media have many
gaslighting tools at their disposal. Some outlets doctor audio or video tapes to make their "bad guy" appear racist or
doing something illegal. Or, they make their "good guy" look like Mother Teresa.
Media
Promotes Fake Narrative That Biden a Moderate. Stephen Collinson is well-known among conservatives as the most
hackneyed of the hacks at CNN. The Twitter account called CNN Politics promoted Collinson's latest online essay with the
words "President [Joe] Biden to showcase his moderate radicalism in his big congressional address." "Moderate radicalism"?
Doesn't that make about as much sense as "quiet loudness"? Collinson argued: "Biden's quiet radicalism is expressed
through a huge pandemic rescue bill, a larger proposal that redefines the concept of infrastructure, and a massive health and
child care blueprint." In other words, a socialist blueprint. [...] But Biden's "superpower" here is the media elite.
They are the ones who have sold Jimmy Carter, Walter Mondale, Michael Dukakis, Bill and Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden
as moderates. This has grown increasingly ridiculous, but they keep shifting the "center" to the extreme left. [...] This isn't
"news." It's just sales.
Meghan
McCain calls out 'rigged' media, throws 'The View' under the bus for burying Hunter Biden scandal. Reacting to
a discussion about Fox News supposedly pushing false narratives, self-described "token conservative" and vocal Never Trumper
Meghan McCain dropped a truth bomb about how corporate media liberals, even on her TV program, seemingly pick and choose what
stories to cover, with advancing a left-wing agenda foremost in mind. Ignoring Hunter Biden's various alleged scandals
was a fundamental error of omission by the mainstream media, she asserted. "Let's go down the list of things every day
that are inaccurate on CNN and NBC, and then we'll talk about fairness in the media," McCain also declared on The View.
The
Fourteen Most Troubling Obama And Kerry Lies About The JCPOA Iran Nuke Deal. Joe Biden and his foreign policy
team are negotiating with Iran, trying to get the U.S. back into the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action ("JCPOA") Iran
nuclear deal. Many support this objective, not realizing that the JCPOA allows Iran to build nuclear weapons in the
near future, and place the United States, the Sunni Gulf States, and Israel in grave danger. The support for returning
to the JCPOA stems from naïvité. Much of Obama and Kerry told America about the JCPOA was not true.
Most of the MSM covered up the lies back then and are still not reporting the truth about the deal.
The far-left Los Angeles Times says... There
is no absolute right to refuse vaccination. We're getting closer to the point where every American who wants to
be vaccinated will have gotten their needle stick. A quarter of Americans say they don't plan to be vaccinated; in
vaccine-friendlier California, that's 1 in 5. Of those who don't plan to be immunized, some worry about the
newness of the vaccines, while others just don't like vaccines in general, despite the mountains of proof about how many
lives they save, and some stubbornly refuse to believe that COVID-19 is all that dangerous.
The Editor says...
Tyranny is far more dangerous than any disease — especially a disease which isn't "all that dangerous," as many sensible people believe.
Mandatory vaccination is especially dangerous when the vaccine — or whatever it really is — is experimental, and it is impossible to know
its long-term side effects. Mandatory vaccination(s) will inevitably put everyone in a position of having to prove they've had their shots,
which would require a so-called vaccination passport to enter public buildings, fly on an airplane, or vote, to name a few examples. This
is a quick and easy recipe for abject tyranny.
Master
Class In Speaking Truth To Power As Ben Domenech Exposes Chris Wallace's Journalism Grift. Ben Domenech visited
Fox News tonight and gave a master class in speaking truth to power when he humiliated Fox News' most insufferable,
nepotism-enriched grifter and BlueAnon conspiracy theorist, Chris Wallace. Wallace had just finished his regular
routine of pretending to be totally oblivious to the lavish praise he heaps on America Lasters and the seething hatred he
harbors for America Firsters. This time around, specifically, he was pretending to be really surprised at just how well
he thinks Biden's speech went (shocker!), and how well he truly believes in his heart of hearts it will be received by the
American people (shocker!). Wallace, of course, is doing what he and his propagandist pals always do: they tell
whatever story they want to be true for as long as they want and then when it's revealed to be a steaming pile of idiocy and
lies, they simply turn the page and pretend it never happened.
USA
Today's publisher Gannett apologizes after being caught helping Stacey Abrams hide encouragement for Georgia losing the
All-Star Game. The largest publisher of newspapers in the United States by total circulation has been caught
red-handed engaging in Orwellian rewriting of history to help Stacey Abrams hide her promotion of the boycott of her home
state of Georgia by the MLB all-Star Game. Ms. Abrams is regarded as a savior by many on the left, even future
presidential material, and is even excused for delusionally claiming to be the actual elected governor of Georgia after
losing that race by tens of thousands of votes, despite the left's new dogma pronouncing it a crime against democracy to
question the legitimacy of Joe Biden's election. Her promotion of the doctrine of Black "voter suppression" when IDs
are required for voting, and her energetic promotion of registration and vote gathering efforts by Democrats have given her a
status as an untouchable goddess, apparently. Even as Black registration and turnout in Georgia put the lie to the
suppression narrative.
A Great New Idea for Reducing
Police Shootings. [Scroll down] The "news" that is plated for us mostly is fake. It is not the
Torah. It is an enterprise that seeks to generate profit among us by baiting us into clicking and into becoming
"followers" and ginning up their ratings, all while the media also seek to sway public opinion. Hitler proved with
Der Stürmer that an entire country could be brainwashed and turned politically by newspapers. Stalin proved
the same with Izvestia and Pravda. Americans have proven no different, no less gullible and
malleable. A concerted full-court press by CBS, NBC, ABC, PBS, CNN, MSNBC, the New York Times, the Washington
Post, Twitter, and Facebook is enough to sway elections. Lies may abound before the voting, with other
uncomfortable news stories suppressed like the one about Hunter Biden's laptop. Then, after the final election tallies
are announced, a day or two of apologies for lying can be offered to Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley at Senate hearings, and that
refreshes the ground until next time. We live amid lies.
Fake
Chicago Police tweet about Derek Chauvin not being removed by Twitter, CPD says. Twitter is refusing to remove
or attach a warning to a doctored image that purports to show a Chicago Police Department tweet that states, "We are all
Derek Chauvin" — despite that the post is not real and the agency has made several attempts to have it taken down,
CPD officials tell Fox News. The altered image began circulating on Twitter at the beginning of the weekend and
features a picture of Chauvin, the recently convicted Minneapolis Police officer, underneath the five-word sentence, which
appears in bigger font than is customarily used on the social media platform. By Saturday, the post had garnered
approximately 38,600 retweets and 175,000 likes, according to local news site CWBChicago.
Abortion
Pills Are Not 'Medication'. Many in the media are increasingly referring to abortion pills as
"medication" — but their terminology couldn't be further from the truth. That's because the purpose of
medicine is to save lives. The purpose of abortion is to end them. The most recent example came when the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) announced that women may temporarily receive the drug mifepristone — the first of two
pills in a chemical abortion — by mail. The news comes months after the Supreme Court granted the FDA's
previous request to reinstate a federal requirement that says women must obtain it from a health care provider in
person. Now, the FDA will halt enforcing this requirement during the pandemic. In their reports, outlets from the
New York Times to Teen Vogue referred to mifepristone as "medication." In order to distinguish from surgical abortion,
many in the media already use "medication abortion," "medical abortion," or "chemical abortion" to describe an abortion
administered by pill. But only recently have major outlets begun switching the words around to use phrases such as
"abortion medication" to call abortion itself a type of medicine.
WaPo
Writer Doesn't Get Concerns About Driving Near Protesters, Here's an Explainer. Washington Post opinion writer
Radley Balko tweeted that he didn't quite get why some people were so worried about "inadvertently driving near a protest,
getting stuck in front of a wall of protesters, then getting pulled out of their car and beaten." [Tweet] In his tweet,
he referenced a ridiculous article from "The New Republic" which claimed Republicans wanted the "right to crash cars into
people" and that Republicans were endorsing a "terroristic tactic" against "protesters." [More tweets] As I've covered
the protests/riots over the past year, I've seen many encounters that have ranged from minor harassment to someone ending up
dead. I'm not sure what Balko has been watching over the past year, but BLM/Antifa people are constantly blocking cars
in the street and getting into encounters with drivers.
Corporate
Media And Other Race-Baiters Have Incited More Violence Than Trump Ever Did. Adam Toledo is a name that has
likely saturated your newsfeed over the past month. He was a 13-year-old Mexican-American boy who was fatally shot by a
police officer on Chicago's West Side not one month ago. This week, that name was overshadowed by Ma'Khia Bryant, a
black teenager who died at the hands of law enforcement in Ohio. In both cases, leftist politicians and
Twitter-verified "journalists" couldn't get the story out fast enough, absent facts, video, or nuance — but the
headlines wrote themselves: "Racist Cop Shoots Unarmed Minority." Also in both cases, the stories turned out to be
completely wrong. On Wednesday we learned that Bryant wasn't just standing in her driveway unarmed, or just casually
holding a knife, or even dueling with another armed kid in a "knife fight" when the officer discharged his weapon.
After the officer arrived, she lunged with a knife at another black girl she had pinned against a car, after having already
charged a different girl nearby. She was armed and dangerous. And the officer, although accused of being a racist
pig by even the White House, instead saved at least one black girl's life.
Cuomo,
Lemon: NBC Committed 'Malpractice' By Not Showing Knife. While doubling down during Thursday's
[4/22/2021] CNN Tonight handoff on their support for Officer Nicholas Reardon's decision to shoot knife-wielding
Ma'Khia Bryant, CNN hosts Chris Cuomo and Don Lemon blasted outlets like NBC who didn't show the knife in Bryant's hand while
reporting on the shooting. The pair accused such outlets of "journalistic malpractice" because they weren't being
honest (an ironic notion given who was flinging it). Their knock came as NewsBusters drove part of the Thursday news cycle
with a report exposing NBC's deception against their audience; editing out a key part of the 911 call and not showing the
knife, before silently adding them in an update. "And, we've got to be honest about these things. And if we're not
honest about these things, as journalists, then it is a dereliction of our duty as journalists. It's journalistic
malpractice not to do it," Lemon opined to his friend.
Will
the Times apologize for lying about Officer Sicknick's death? An unruly crowd entered the US Capitol on Jan. 6,
while then-President Donald Trump addressed a rally several blocks away. One member of that crowd, Ashli Babbitt, an
unarmed woman and a veteran, was shot by the Capitol Police. The next day, Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick died
in the hospital. On Jan. 8, The New York Times reported that Officer Sicknick had died after being struck in the head
with a fire extinguisher by violent Trump supporters. This story was quickly repeated by numerous other media outlets.
Millions believed it. The story was false. Sicknick died of two strokes, which occurred many hours after the invasion
of the Capitol. The blue-check-media fallback was that bear spray used by the Capitol invaders had caused the officer's
strokes. That also turned out to be false. After a curiously long delay, the DC medical examiner's office released
its report this week, and it concludes that Sicknick suffered no injuries, internal or external. He didn't have a reaction
to bear spray, the chief medical examiner reported.
Media
Pants on Fire. Media trust is at an all-time low, a majority of Americans believing that, "Most news organizations
are more concerned with supporting an ideology or political position than with informing the public." An Axios
commissioned survey found that only 46 percent of Americans trusted traditional media, the lowest number ever recorded in the
20 years of this survey. Gallup found similar distrust of the media, with only 40 percent of Americans having "a great
deal" or even "a fair amount" of confidence that the media reports the news "fully accurately, and fairly". The low point was
a 32 percent level of trust in 2016 when Donald Trump was elected president and he correctly labeled the media as "fake
news". 20 years ago, media trust was much higher, in the mid 50 percent range, despite Dan Rather at that time, a major
network news anchor, lying about George W Bush's National Guard service. In other words, the media is lying to us and
we are catching on to the lies.
Officer
Sicknick Died of Natural Causes, Not Riot Injuries. This was just another massive lie used to gaslight the
American people and justify an ongoing manhunt for Trump supporters who had the audacity to protest an illegitimate election.
Glenn
Greenwald on what the truth about Officer Sicknick's death says about the media. We learned yesterday that Officer
Brian Sicknick died of natural causes. The significance of that admission was not just for Sicknick's immediate family,
some of whom already seem to have known he didn't die from an attack with a fire extinguisher. The real significance was
the way in which this undercut the media's confident framing of his death as a victim of the Jan. 6 riot. Yesterday,
Glenn Greenwald took this occasion to point out how this lie got going and why the media desperately wanted it to be true. [...]
The partisan motivation for this to be true was so overwhelming that doubt about it was treated as a kind of heresy. The
media's progressive voices worked as the equivalent of Hockey goons to punish anyone who dared to say different.
The
New York Times Has Just Been Caught In Two Monstrous Lies. On Tuesday, the public learned that Capitol Police
Officer Brian Sicknick died of natural causes. Just a few days before that, the public learned that the "Russian
Bounty" story was fake. In other words, in the span of a week, the "newspaper of record" has been exposed for grossly
misleading the public about two major stories — both designed to discredit President Donald Trump. [...] Start
with Sicknick. The New York Times was the paper that reported he'd been killed by a pro-Trump protester who threw a
fire extinguisher at Sicknick during the Jan. 6 incursion into the Capitol Building. The Times claimed that, after
being struck and suffering a "bloody gash on his head," Sicknick "was rushed to the hospital and placed on life support"
where he later died. [...] What did the Times base its story on? Unnamed sources, of course. There were no
pictures. No videos. No on-the-record accounts. No medical examiner's report. The story fell apart,
as news emerged — no thanks to the mainstream press — that Sicknick had texted his family about being
in good spirits that night. Then we learned that he'd returned to his office after the events at the Capitol, and only
later went to the hospital.
A
New Poll Shows the Pollsters Aren't Even Trying Anymore. You've probably noticed a barrage of approval rating
polls being released in the past month or so, and nearly all of them show Joe Biden as a president for the ages. We've
seen such high numbers as 60% approval in some surveys. Perhaps Biden is just that much of a unifier, despite pushing
the most radical, divisive agenda in modern history? Or perhaps there's something else going on with these polls.
Yeah, it's the latter. Random thought, but if your sample is coming out to a raw D+31 sample, perhaps there's something
wrong with your pool that you are originally drawing from? Are they just calling people in blue states? Further,
if you look at the internals, they only weight the poll to D+9, while the 2020 election was Biden +4. The margin was
even smaller in the vote totals for the House, for example. In other words, the country much more evenly divided than
shown here, but according to these pollsters, we are in a new era of peace and unity. The purpose of this is clear:
to push a narrative of inevitability going into 2022 for Democrats.
Democrat-run
institutions are cheating to prop up the Biden administration. In three months, Joe Biden has exffectively
erased all American norms. Worse, he's done so by executive fiat rather than the legislative process. It's likely
that only Democrats (and not even all Democrats) support him. Nevertheless, a Pew poll, which the media is shilling,
assures us that he's got a 59% approval rating. Dig into the poll, though, and it's a lie [...]. In other words, we
are being sold a narrative that has nothing to do with the truth. First, about that poll. [...] It turns out that, as
to some of those things, we know that most Americans oppose Biden's policies. On Court-packing, an October poll
that the New York Times conducted showed that 58% of likely voters oppose it. Americans feel even more strongly
about voter ID: 75% of them support it. Americans also disapprove of Biden's border policy, with 55% of them saying
he's doing a bad job and only 29% saying he's doing a good job.
MSM
Edits Police Bodycam Footage And Removes The Part Where 13-yr-old Adam Toledo Is Seen Holding Firearm. Dan
Herbert, a Chicago attorney who has represented a number of police officers involved in deadly use of force incidents, says
the officer who shot and killed 13-year-old Adam Toledo "absolutely had a reason to fire" if he believed the teen possessed a
gun while turning toward him. The Civilian Office of Police Accountability — the city's police oversight
agency — on Thursday released body camera videos and other related materials two days after Adam's family was
shown footage of the March 29 shooting in Little Village. The footage shows an officer chasing Adam in an alley while
shouting at him to stop. Adam appears to pause near a fence bordering a parking lot at the end of the alley and turn
toward the officer with his hands up but just moments before he threw away his gun.
CBS
News Edited Police Body Cam Video To Mask Teen Holding A Gun Before He Was Fatally Shot. CBS News deceptively
cropped body camera footage that showed a 13-year-old boy holding a gun before he was fatally shot by Chicago police in
March. A law enforcement officer fatally shot Adam Toledo during an encounter in response to gunshots heard on a police
scanner. Police said Toledo ignored "verbal directions, fled, used significant force, and was armed with a
semiautomatic pistol," which is why the officer fired. Body cam footage released this week appears to show Toledo
holding a weapon moments before he was shot, but CBS News posted a clip to its website and Twitter page that cropped out the
footage showing the teen's alleged firearm.
Media pushes false
narrative of racism. The riots that have erupted after the killing of Daunte Wright reinforce a familiar
pattern. This response is rooted not only in tragedy, but in a distorted perception of reality. Chelsea Handler,
for example, suggested that people of color have a "50-50" chance of being shot by police. This is a complete
distortion, but fits a broader pattern. My latest report for the Manhattan Institute, based on multiple surveys, shows
that being exposed to news and social media, having left-wing views on race, and being anxious or depressed explains a great
deal of how much racism a person perceives. And when someone says racism in America has risen, this perception is
almost entirely a figment of their imagination. In fact, racist attitudes and behaviors have been declining for decades.
Liz
Cheney Plays the Fool After Anti-Trump 'Bombshell' Collapses. Yesterday, Joe Biden's own intelligence community
dropped the news that the "Russian bounties" story used to target President Trump was absolute garbage. Of course, some
of us knew it before the 2020 election and reported that (see That 'Bombshell' Russian Bounty Story Was Just Officially Shown
to Be Garbage). Once again, "right-wing" news outlets were proven right while CNN and other "unbiased" outlets were made to
look like the unreliable, partisan sources they are. But on the political side, there was one figure who went all-in on
the nonsense in order to try to keep the perpetual war in Afghanistan going. That person was Rep. Liz Cheney.
Fake
news on Afghanistan and Russia: The media's bounty of lies. Remember when the press and leftist
politicians badgered President Trump? A story came out from the New York Times in 2020 claiming that Russia was paying
bounties to Talibanites to kill U.S. troops stationed there. (As if these Islamofacist maniacs might not be motivated
otherwise to do it themselves.) Oh, the brouhaha it drew! President Trump was constantly blamed for not taking
the problem 'seriously' and America-hating Democrats had a field day of playing patriot. It came out during election
season, and Joe Biden played it to the hilt, being Mr. Patriot and all, despite never serving. The aim of all this
tiresome crap, played over and over and over on the nighttime news, was to Get Trump, by bringing back that old dead cat
about Trump being Putin's puppet. Turns out that this bounty claim was, like a lot of these stories, a naked, total lie.
U.S.
Intelligence Now Says Story of Russian Bounties on American Troops Likely False. After the media blew up a
story about Russian military putting bounties on American troops in an effort to shape a Russian collusion narrative against
the administration of President Trump, the U.S. intelligence community now says that story was likely false.
Conrad
Black's Tour de Force. Today [4/13/2021] Conrad Black has an outstanding take-down of the WSJ's foolish
anti-Trump editorial (on Friday). The WSJ editorial is titled "The GOP's Trump Problem" — see, Trump is the
problem. [...] Black covers a lot of ground. I'll try to summarize the main points, while urging readers to follow the
link — you won't regret it. Black talks turkey, explains the facts of political life in lucid terms.
Black's basic thesis is that the WSJ has things exactly backwards. Trump is not the problem for the GOP. Rather, the
Never Trumps are the problem. Trump had a remarkably successful term, especially in light of the constant betrayals and
the concerted Dem and Deep State assault on our constitutional order. The reality, contrary to the WSJ's view, is that
Republicans want more of the Trump agenda — whether led by Trump himself or by a Trump approved proxy. In
fact, the disastrous start and likely deepening national crisis we are experiencing under the Zhou Baiden regime (whoever or
what cabal actually is pulling the strings) favor this solution for the GOP, in Black's view.
The GOP's Trump Solution.
The Wall Street Journal on Friday [4/9/2021] published an editorial headlined "The GOP's Trump Problem." It gets
things terribly wrong. The GOP is Trump's party and it is the Wall Street Journal that has the Trump problem.
Having been commendably supportive of the former president through most of his term, the Journal joined in the general
embarkation of NeverTrumpers over the ostensible election results. The theory that inspired this headline is Trump had
his chance but lost the election in a manner practically indistinguishable from defeated incumbents Jimmy Carter in 1980 and
George H. W. Bush in 1992 (when there were no suggestions of questionable results). The editors suggest further
that Trump had exhausted any grounds he had for contesting the fairness of the counting of ballots, and that it was his duty to
go quietly into that good night and do everything that he could to elect Republican senators in Georgia to preserve the Republican
majority in the Senate and to enhance the likelihood of the reelection next year of Governor Brian Kemp of Georgia and his
secretary of state Brad Raffensperger.
Dangerous
Word Games: Nets Drop 'Mostly Peaceful,' Riots Are Now 'Protests'. The left's Orwellian redefining of
words took a dangerous step Monday as all three of the broadcast networks (ABC, CBS, and NBC) started to refer to the riots
of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota as "protests," effectively dropping the "mostly peaceful" label they were mocked for using in
the summer of 2020. All of this followed an apparently accidental shooting where a police officer seemingly went to use her
Taser but discharged her duty pistol instead. The first showing of the media's dangerous rebranding of riots came
earlier in the day when an activist journalist screamed at Brooklyn Center Police Chief Tim Gannon, saying "there was no
riot" as he described how his officers were attacked with projectiles. "The officers that were putting themselves in
harm's way were being pelted with frozen cans of pop, they were being pelted with concrete blocks," he told the press.
The truth didn't matter to the broadcast networks as they gaslit their audiences. "A curfew now in place following
protests and clashes with police," announced ABC's World News Tonight anchor, David Muir during the opening
tease. And as CBS Evening News anchor Norah O'Donnell teased the "violent protests," NBC Nightly News
anchor Lester Holt noted that "protesters clashing with police."
Our
Honesty Crisis: How We Talk about Race. Less than two weeks later, Noah Green rammed his car into Capitol
Police officer William Evans and killed him near the fencing that surrounds the Capitol. When Green emerged from his
car with a knife, he was shot and killed. Afterward it was revealed that Green was a follower of Louis Farrakhan and
the Nation of Islam. It does not bother me that Green was black or followed Farrakhan. It bothers me that he
killed a Capitol Hill police officer a week ago, and we won't talk about that story for very long. On the other hand,
three months after Officer Brian Sicknick died, many people still believe he was beaten to death by white supremacists with a
fire extinguishers at the "insurrection" because the media lied so loudly about it. All of it goes to show that if the
lie is big enough, a lot of people do not even notice the correction — even if the victim's own mother tries to
correct the narrative.
Another,
Clearer Take on the Chauvin Trial. I leave it to you to decide why, from the Trayvon Martin case to the George
Floyd case, the media has so consistently misrepresented the facts. Whether it is that unskilled reporters are covering
these matters, or that the press is simply looking to attract consumers with florid tales, or that the media looks forward to
destroying urban areas with false tales of murderous white racists (amid a shortage of real ones), I cannot say. [...] (I'd
also note that it is my experience that reporters' deadlines often conflict with the way trials proceed, so that too often
the prosecution (or in civil matters, the plaintiff) case is presented just before deadline and the cross examination occurs
too late to be covered in that day's edition, leaving only a false, one-sided version of the day's action.)
The Hunter and Jim Biden story:
• Wasn't hacked material
• Wasn't Russian misinformation
• Is something people deserved to know before voting
• Big tech + corporate media tried to make sure that didn't happen
• And now they're going to gaslight you about all of it.
Atlanta
Journal-Constitution Offers Correction After Printing Biden's Lies About GA Election Law Bill. The Atlanta
Journal-Constitution (AJC) issued a correction on a story that made some false claims about Georgia's election law reform
legislation. The newspaper made the mistake of printing Democrat talking points, specifically remarks made by President
Biden, instead of the truth. AJC originally falsely reported that voting hours had been cut in the bill and failed to
note that early voting days had been added for general elections while shortening the time for early voting in primary
run-offs. The newspaper printed the correction at the end of a story on liberal filmmaker and actor Tyler Perry.
Perry owns a large production company in the Atlanta area. Perry was quick to come out against the Georgia legislation
signed into law by Governor Kemp. He voiced hope that the Department of Justice will look into "the unconstitutional law".
Journalists Attack
the Powerless, Then Self-Victimize to Bar Criticisms of Themselves. The daily newspaper USA Today is the
second-most circulated print newspaper in the United States — more than The New York Times and more than
double The Washington Post. Only The Wall Street Journal has higher circulation numbers. On Sunday
[3/28/2021], the paper published and heavily promoted a repellent article complaining that "defendants accused in the Capitol
riot Jan. 6 crowdfund their legal fees online, using popular payment processors and an expanding network of fundraising
platforms, despite a crackdown by tech companies." It provided a road map for snitching on how these private
citizens — who are charged with serious felonies by the U.S. Justice Department but as of yet convicted of
nothing — are engaged in "a game of cat-and-mouse as they spring from one fundraising tool to another" in order to
avoid bans on their ability to raise desperately needed funds to pay their criminal lawyers to mount a vigorous defense.
These
6 Stupendous Hoaxes Are Reasons to Give Media Narrative About 'Asian Hate' the Hairy Eyeball. But not every
political battle is 1963 Birmingham and not every political foe is the KKK. Reported violence against Asians is not
necessarily Birmingham all over again. The narrative that it's President Trump's fault because he used the phrase
"China virus" last year strains credulity. The all-too-eager anti-Trump media, however, amplifies this message.
Indeed, this story and others, including the COVID lockdown/mask information, and the attack on the Capitol Building on
January 6th, all have taken on the tell tale signs of hit-and-run narrative-run journalism. Caveat emptor.
We've seen the media fail to let facts get in the way of a too-good-to-check-story with disastrous results. Here are
just a few. [...]
Chris
Wallace Falsely Claims New Georgia Law Bans Drinking Water While In Line For Voting. Fox News' Chris Wallace
claimed Sunday Georgia voters are prohibited from being given food or drink in line at the ballot box under a law the state's
governor signed last week. "Let's take a look at some of the provisions in Georgia," Wallace said during an interview
with South Carolina Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham. "The one that I think is creating the biggest fuss, it
prohibits, it makes it a crime to give food or drink to voters waiting in line. Senator, why on Earth if Americans are
willing to wait hours to vote, would you make it a crime for people to come and give them a bottle of water?"
[Video clip]
The
Commonalities Between the Rise of the Nazis and the Tactics of the American Left Cannot be Ignored. [Scroll
down] Third, the Nazis perfected the art of indoctrinating the citizenry through propaganda and "fake news." Joseph
Goebbels, Nazi minister of propaganda, is credited with saying: "If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it,
people will eventually come to believe it." and "Think of the press as a great keyboard on which government can play."
This strategy has been and continues to be used to great success by the American left and their fellow travelers in the
mainstream (Democrat) media. Whether it is the Russian collusion hoax, the so-called armed insurrection on January 6,
2021, climate change as an existential threat to mankind, suppression of voting rights, white supremacy running rampant, the
necessity of lockdowns for the Covid pandemic or a myriad of other fabrications, they left lies with impunity as a means to
their ends... as did the Nazis.
Grassley
To DoJ: Why Has No One Been Charged With Crimes Over False Kavanaugh Allegations? Good question, especially
since this happened two and a half years ago. Will the Department of Justice enforce false-statements laws
consistently, or only when special counsels are involved? Thanks to Senate Democrats' sandbagging in the Brett
Kavanaugh confirmation process, a number of people came out of the woodwork to make clearly false allegations to the Senate
as a way to derail his appointment to the Supreme Court. Grassley wants to know when they will face
charges — and it's not the first time the ranking Senate Judiciary member has asked.
Truth
And Lies In A Digital Media Era. Those in the media who speak to us and desire to control us, but still want to
avoid outright lies, do so by shading the truth, offering spin, or using phrases such as, "it's my opinion", "as I remember
it" and, the chart-topper, "at this point why does it matter?". They know they operate in an environment where falsehoods and
misrepresentations can take root before there is an opportunity to measure the validity of allegations or assertions.
Such liars know the truth but deform and simulate it. [...] We live in a time when the bulk of our fellow citizens have been
indoctrinated rather than educated. Rather than learning facts — including relatively objective
history — they are encouraged to think of themselves in terms of relationships to one another. What is
important to them is what is trending in digital social media and who the influencers of the moment are. Status comes
from horizontal acclaim. Digital social networks have replaced real social networks. This leads to a society
adrift, with people desperate to have someone to guide them. Mainstream news organizations and digital social media
platform providers seek to fill this need.
US
Media's Misleading Framing Of Atlanta Police Officer's Comments About Shooter Used In Chinese Propaganda.
American media's misleading framing of a police officer's description about why a man shot up multiple massage parlors in
Atlanta was used by China's state-run media outlet Sunday [3/21/2021]. The Xinhua News Agency, the official state-run
press agency of the People's Republic of China, repeated a misleading claim suggesting Cherokee County Sheriff Capt. Jay
Baker made excuses for Robert Aaron Long, who stands accused of killing eight people in Atlanta. The misleading claim
suggested Baker told reporters — in his view — that it "was a really bad day for" Long. "8 lives
taken, 6 of them Asian. And the killer was just 'having a bad day'!" Xinhua News Agency tweeted Sunday.
The
mainstream media's anti-White racism is escalating. [Scroll down] The media's racial obsession is a way
to maintain the Democrats' political power, by silencing the opposition, and to drive ratings. Eventually, though, the
real-world consequences are going to be disastrous. If our children are consistently told that Whites are not just
racist, but akin to the KKK or even Nazis, the means that waging war against them is within the pale of moral behavior.
I am deeply concerned that the media will incite someone — or a group of someones — to take up arms in
the imaginary war against "White supremacists" and start targeting people based upon their skin color.
The
Real Reasons Why Millions Of Americans Will Defy Covid Mandates And Vaccines. I suspect a large portion of the
public is at least partially aware when they are being pushed or lured into a specific way of thinking. [...] The media does
not objectively report facts and evidence, it spins information to plant an engineered narrative in the minds of its
viewers. But the public is not as stupid as they seem to think. This is probably why trust in the media has
plunged by 46% in the past ten years, hitting an all time low this year of 27%. Except for pre-election season spikes,
mainstream outlets from CNN to Fox to CBS to MSNBC are facing dismal audience numbers, with only around 2 million to
3 million prime time viewers. There are numerous YouTube commentators with bigger audiences than this. And,
if you sift through the debris of MSM videos on YouTube, you'll find low hits and a majority of people that are visiting their
channels just to make fun of them.
Numerous
Liberal Outlets Claimed to Independently Verify Debunked WaPo Story. Shocker: the media lied to the American
public once again. We learned recently that the Washington Post, after claiming to have verified a story from anonymous
sources, did no such thing for one particular "bombshell" story. The Post initially reported in January that Trump told
an official working in Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger's office to "find the fraud" in the state, telling them
that they would be a national hero if she did. The call took place on December 23rd, and was just released, proving
that Trump never said that. In reality, Trump said that this unnamed official would be praised when the "right answer
comes out" and encouraged them to examine mail-in ballots in Fulton county. The recording was discovered in this
unnamed official's computer trash bin after they said they didn't think a recording existed. Without their gross
incompetence in what appears to be them trying to cover her tracks, this bogus reporting would've never been exposed.
5
Other Totally Bogus Stories Designed To Hurt Trump The Media Got Away With. The correction by The Washington
Post concerning false information about a phone call between former President Donald Trump and the Georgia secretary of
state's chief investigator is no anomaly. The neglect of truth and preference for anonymous sources is deeply ingrained
in the corrupt left-wing media's strategy. "You will notice that establishment media errors, omissions, mistakes, and
outright lies always slant one way — against me and against Republicans. Meanwhile, stories that hurt
Democrats or undermine their narratives are buried, ignored, or delayed until they can do the least harm," Trump said in a
statement Monday in response to widespread corrections from The New York Times, CNN, ABC, and so on. The Washington
Post correction struck right to the core of why journalism is dying and has been for years, and it served as a reminder of
the media's lack of ethics and standards throughout the Russian collusion scramble. Here are five major Trump-Russia
stories the media botched. [...]
The Media Lied about Brian
Sicknick's Death. Remember how we were told, shortly after the mass trespass at the Capitol, that 5 people had
died because of the "act of sedition" or "coup" and that all Trump supporters were responsible for their deaths? I
do. In any case, it turned out that that information was, at best, partially true. In regard to Brian Sicknick,
the police officer who sadly died that day, it was absolutely untrue. For one, the only person actually killed on Jan.
6 was Ashli Babbitt, an Air Force veteran who was shot in the neck by an LEO for crawling though a window. She was
unarmed and not doing anything violent. The other three people who died died of "medical emergencies," whatever that
means, not injuries sustained during the day's events. And that leaves Brian Sicknick, the police officer who sadly
died on Jan. 6. The problem is that, while Democrats blamed Trump supporters for his death and even let his body
lie in state, there's no evidence that he died because of anything protesters did. In fact, despite the media preaching
for months that he died after being bludgeoned to death with a fire extinguisher, that appears to be entirely untrue.
Audio
That Debunked Fraudulent Trump Quotes [was] Found On GA State Government Device: Report. An audio
recording that forced multiple major news outlets to issue corrections to stories that attributed fraudulent quotes to former
President Donald Trump was reportedly found on the device of the chief investigator of the Georgia secretary of state's
office. Trump made a call to the chief investigator, Frances Watson, on Dec. 23 to discuss alleged fraud in the 2020
election, asking her to look into votes cast in Fulton County, Georgia, especially. Reports of the call published the
next month by The Washington Post, CNN, and others quoted Trump as telling Watson to "find the fraud" and claiming she would
be a "national hero" if she did. An audio recording of the call published last week showed that Trump made neither
statement, debunking news outlets' claims that were sourced back to a single anonymous source. The recording of the
call was obtained through an open records request to the Georgia secretary of state's office. Officials reportedly
located the file in a trash folder on Watson's device, according to CNN.
Audio
shows the media got the Trump-Georgia story all wrong. It's one thing if a single news outlet publishes a
fraudulent anonymously sourced "scoop." It's another thing entirely if multiple newsrooms claim they independently
"confirmed" the fraudulent "scoop" with anonymous sources of their own. The former can reasonably be explained away as
a simple error; the latter is not so simple. It's unrealistic so many sources would be wrong about the same
thing. It's more likely competing news outlets spoke with the same anonymous individual or individuals, which leads to
uncomfortable questions about whether the media were merely fed bad information or were intentionally manipulated. [...] If
you can believe it, the Washington Post bungling its "bombshell" report isn't the most scandalous thing about this
episode in media malfeasance. No, the most scandalous thing is: Several newsrooms claimed they independently
"confirmed" the most [condemnatory] details of the Washington Post's since-corrected "scoop."
If
This Week You Learned Biden is 'Hopeful' And Tucker Carlson Is Evil, Congratulations, You've Been Lied To. If
you hadn't watched the president's prime-time address, you might think it was something — anything —
other than the most depressing, defeated, and resigned speech since President Jimmy Carter held the office. You might
think he hadn't devoted his third sentence to a baseless attack on his predecessor, and the entire rest of his address to
death, sadness, loneliness, and despair. You might think he hadn't literally threatened the American people, warning,
"We may have to reinstate restrictions to get back on track, please, we don't want to do that again." Rather, to read The
Washington Post homepage's featured commentary on the address, you'd think "Much of that speech was about hope." "It was
about seeing a shaft of light at the end of a dark horror," Robin Givhan, a 56-year-old woman who once won a Pulitzer for
"witty, closely observed essays that transform fashion criticism into cultural criticism," wrote. "His white French
cuffs and his crisp pocket square," she went to tell us, "evoked all of the institutional power and authority at his disposal
to make things better." "[H]is mere presence on television," she insisted, was a declaration of "his pride in the
country's progress." If you're wondering why you didn't see any of this, don't worry: It didn't happen.
Another
Opinion Columnist Pushing War With Iran Who Doesn't Actually Exist. There is at least one more foreign policy
opinion writer from the Mujahideen-eKhalq (MEK) whose existence is dubious, based on a study by a social media analyst and
statements from a defector from the group. Amir Basiri, who contributed to Forbes 9 times, the Washington
Examiner 52 times, OpenDemocracy, Algemeiner, and The Hill once also appears to be a fabrication. The MEK is
an Iranian exile group for which John Bolton, Rudy Giuliani, and other foreign policy luminaries have given paid speeches.
Dems like Joe Lieberman and Howard Dean have also spoken on their behalf. But the group has American blood on its hands,
has been accused of practicing forced sterilization, and their belief system has been described as a mixture of Marxism and
Islamism. Its supporters claim they, and their front group the National Council of Resistance of Iran, are a sort of
government-in-exile, despite nearly nonexistent support for the group within Iran. They also have waged a substantial
disinformation campaign in the Western press, in particular targeting conservative media.
When
Minorities Vote GOP, the Media Smears Republicans as Racists. In just one week, the Washington Post
churned out two op-eds on the same theme, "The GOP is Now Just the Party of White Grievance" and "The Republican Party is
Making Jim Crow Segregationists Proud". The D.C. Democrat paper doesn't bother clarifying why Democrats from two
generations ago would be thrilled that 1 in 5 black men voted for President Trump. Ever since the election, the
media has been beating its narrative drum with one message. CNN howls that Republicans are the worst racists. The
New York Times insists they're even more racist than that. And MSNBC will counter that only white racists would
vote Republican.
So
where are the nightly network news pictures of all the 'kids in cages'? The media posted fake news stories with
"kids in cages" pictures dating the Obama/Biden years in their four-year collusion with Democrats to destroy President
Trump. So where are the nightly televised pictures today of kids sleeping on cement floors in crowded facilities?
Somehow, we do not see them. [...] Where's Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, who went down for a photo-op wearing white, in order to
weep in front of an empty parking lot, and compare illegal immigrant detentions during the Trump administration to Nazi
concentration camps? Where is the Hollywood crowd who have always protested Trump's actions? I must assume none
of them really cared and it was always a political attack or else they would be actively protesting. The Biden
administration also clearly doesn't care about how contagious the coronavirus, which migrants are bringing in with them,
is. They are not quarantining the migrant kids who are sick or the kids who have had contact with other sick
people. Nope, they are crowding them into jail-like facilities and then sending them around the U.S. to expose others.
The
Roots of Insurrection: Antifa Exposed. The mainstream media — silent on the Marxist ideology,
violence, and militancy of groups like Antifa and Black Lives Matter (BLM) — deceptively reported that the
protests they inflicted on over 200 U.S. cities in 2020 were "mostly peaceful." It deceitfully transformed the mayhem
into a "summer of love." Widespread rioting, looting, arson, murder, assaults, and destruction of property and
businesses went unreported. Such abject failure explains why polls consistently rank the media among America's least
trusted institutions. Given media complicity with radical groups, it's not surprising that the Los Angeles Times
dismissed Andy Ngo's Unmasked: Inside Antifa's Radical Plan to Destroy Democracy as unserious, "supremely
dishonest," and "self-serving." [...] It says he's fixated on the "imaginary threat of Antifa" and ignores the "real danger"
from far-right extremists.
How
the Media Distorts Debate and Details of HR 1. A piece of legislation working its way through Congress would
upend further the way Americans conduct elections. But the way many media outlets are covering it, one would think the
bill — which Democrats designated as HR 1 or the so-called For the People Act — is just a simple,
uncontroversial "reform" that most Americans agree with. It's far from that. [...] For instance, media outlets
frequently portray HR 1 as a "voter rights" bill. Outlet after outlet describes the legislation this way, despite
vagueness about exactly what voting rights are being threatened. [...] Are Americans really uniformly in favor of effectively
nullifying state voter ID laws, or handing over all power for overseeing elections to an increasingly partisan federal
agency? As studies have shown, voter ID laws don't appear to affect minority voter turnout at all. So why is
that election integrity measure considered voter suppression? It looks like HR 1 has nothing to do with protecting
voter rights and everything to do with manipulating and nationalizing how we conduct elections.
Things
that don't make sense, except to Democrats. [Scroll down] Now that cases, deaths, and hospitalizations
are declining rapidly we see fewer stories. They have to get the $1.9 Trillion leftist slush fund passed before the
public is allowed to learn the truth. I also am seeing frequent reporting complaining that not as many people are
getting tested. The media, bureaucrats and other Democrats should be cheering that fewer people are scared and fewer
people feel the need to get tested but they are complaining. The cheers should be very loud because even with fewer
people testing, the positivity rate has dropped rapidly. It's as if the media and other Democrats would rather keep
destroying the economy and children instead of getting schools and businesses open. The cheerleading and campaigning
for Democrats is what reporters do. How is that valuable to the American people?
Correcting
the Biden Administration's Lies About the Border Crisis. What is happening right now on the border and within
the United States regarding illegal immigration is being misrepresented by the Biden administration and much of the
media. Most nightly television broadcasts do not even mention the chaos on the border, what is causing it and what the
government is doing in response. When they do, they merely copy the administration's talking points that are inaccurate
and misleading.
Developing
some perspective on the Capitol riot. In the last few days we've seen a series of hearings in the House and
Senate on the January 6 riot at the Capitol. After all the talk, we still don't know some of the basic facts of the
riot, especially the circumstances surrounding the death of Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick, the only law enforcement
officer and only non-rioter to die in the violence. But in spite of the gaps in our knowledge, a sense of perspective
on the riot — Who was involved? What did they think they were doing? — has begun to emerge.
First, the riot is often referred to as an "armed insurrection." A search of the Nexis database of newspapers, websites, and
cable news transcripts finds 2,339 times since January 6 in which the riot was described as an "armed insurrection."
On many other occasions, the rioters were described simply as "armed." But the description requires an asterisk that is rarely,
if ever, applied. A small number of the rioters did indeed have baseball bats or bear spray, and a few used flagsticks or even,
in one case, a crutch as weapons to assault Capitol police. But the armed insurrectionists did not use any firearms.
Ron
Johnson Gets FBI to Admit That No Firearms Were Seized During the Capitol Riot. Ever since the riot in the US
Capitol on January 6, we have struggled to find out exactly what happened there. As time goes on, we are finding that
just about everything we were told about that event is false. We know, for instance, that one of the rioters, the one
who took the video of the execution of Ashli Babbitt, was on the payroll of CNN and NBC, see ["]Leftist Videographer John
Sullivan Was Paid by Major Media Organizations for Footage of the Capitol Unrest["]. We know that Capitol Police
officer Brian Sicknick was not beaten to death, and we also know that nearly two months after his death, the FBI still
refuses to give a cause of death or charge anyone with a crime, see ["]FBI Director Wray Is Asked About Brian Sicknick's
Cause of Death, His Response Is Just Not Acceptable["]. We know there were no "kill teams" looking for Mike Pence or
anyone else. We know the guys with zip ties picked them up from where Capitol Police dropped them. We have yet to
see any evidence that any member of Congress or senator aided the rioters.
Attack of the Woke Teen Career Killers. [Scroll down]
This is why newspapers can't be trusted anymore. Reporters need to have a normal person's understanding of what words mean, so they can get on with the story. If a
field is described as "barren," we don't need to know the precise size, type and amount of vegetation per square foot. But if we find out that by "barren," reporters mean
"lush," then every word becomes suspect, and we're going to need six paragraphs detailing the precise amount of greenery in the field. Not one word they use can be believed.
More to the point, if reporters call someone a "white supremacist," we need to know if the Times' definition of "white supremacist" includes a person who:
· questions race preferences in hiring and college admissions;
· believes most people are in prison because they committed crimes; or
· admires Western culture.
[...] These sourpuss zealots are in such a mad race to show their wokeness, they are useless as conduits for the news. What they do isn't "reporting." It's terrorism.
The
Great Hacking of Vermont's Electrical Grid That Never Happened. Prominent media critics keep insisting that
inaccurate reports from prominent institutions are completely different from the made-up "fake news" found on Facebook and
other social media networks. But do news consumers see them as completely different? The net effect is the same:
something that is not true gets communicated far and wide, and the correct information is spread on a much smaller
scale. A new poll found 52 percent of Democrats believe Russia "tampered with the vote tallies" to make Trump the
winner in the presidential race. There is no evidence of this. When the big-name media institutions and elected
Democratic officials twist the news to the point of falsehood, it's not surprising that so many of the rank-and-file would
believe something that isn't true.
Lying About
Obama. Jack Cashill has written over a dozen books, including two about the mysterious 1996 explosion of TWA
Flight 800, one about the Trayvon Martin case, and two — now three — about Barack Obama. His new
book, Unmasking Obama: The Fight to Tell the True Story of a Failed Presidency, is a definitive account not only
of Obama's eight years in office but also of the transformation of most mainstream American political journalists, largely
during the Obama era, from relatively objective reporters of the facts — emphasis on "relatively" — to
dedicated partisans of the left, ready and eager at every turn to cover up unpleasant truths (however important) about
Democrats and to promote outrageous lies (however destructive) about Republicans. Fortunately, in the age of the
Internet, the mainstream media have competition.
A culture of lies.
Almost everything you are being told to believe by the mainstream media is a lie. The legacy media has long since
chosen sides and will brazenly cover up anything that could reflect poorly on Democrats, yet will assiduously traffic in any
and all innuendo, hearsay, and slander that they feel will harm Republicans/conservatives/Trump supporters. They
gleefully promulgate prevarication in their unending quest to damage Democrats' political opponents.
How
many people would still be alive today without media COVID malpractice? If there's one thing we've learned from
the COVID-19 lockdowns, it's that the mainstream media duped us time and again. Not surprisingly, trust in the Fourth
Estate is at an all-time low. According to Axios, nearly 60 percent of Americans agree with the statement that
"journalists and reporters are purposely trying to mislead people by saying things they know are false or gross exaggerations."
What
a Reporter's Arrest at a BLM Riot Tells Us About the Media. [Scroll down] While working for the Des
Moines Register, [Andrea] Sahouri had repeatedly covered publicity stunts by Rep. Ako Abdul-Samad. Even after
her arrest, the paper continued to use Sahouri to cover the protests and Samad, including glamorizing the arrest of a BLM
organizer busted over the vandalism of a cop car. There's a basic conflict in having an activist, especially one that
has a history with a hate group, covering a cause she's passionate about, especially after she's been arrested. The
Des Moines Register has gone on insisting that Sahouri is a journalist who was wrongly arrested. But Robnett,
her fellow activist and boyfriend, isn't a journalist. He appears to work in marketing. Journalists don't bring
their boyfriends along to a rally unless they're there to take part in the event. During the BLM riots, leftist members
of the media frequently blurred the line between activism and journalism. But Sahouri may be one of the more egregious
examples. The Register, Amnesty International, and other left-wing organizations continue to attack the police,
but have refused to ask basic questions about Sahouri's extremist background. Or why she was arrested, along with her
boyfriend, while another Register reporter wasn't.
Brainwashing
Achieved! Democrat Voters Overwhelmingly Believe "Trump Supporters" Are The #1 Problem In The Country.
The #1 goal of the liberal media ever since Trump came down the escalator in June of 2015 was to smear his supporters as
"racists, bigots, sexist, deplorable scum of the earth". In early 2021, they added "domestic terrorist" to the
list. Sadly, according to a brand new poll, the media smear campaign has proved to be effective. A new poll from
Echelon Insights shows that the #1 "concern" for Democrat voters is "Trump supporters". Yes, really. Not police
brutality, gun violence, healthcare, student debt, or 7 of the other items they were asked about. Trump supporters.
[...] The media makes the money machine churn when they can divide the people, and the results of this poll show they are
doing an exceptional job.
Why
The Texas Blackout Has The Greens So Scared: Deflecting blame to a more exciting apocalypse. Within days,
most of the country was seeing "with our own eyes" and feeling "in our bones" a cold wave so severe that five million people
lost electricity and, in a special irony, nearly half of the ballyhooed wind turbines in Texas, which had risen to supply 23%
of her energy, were left frozen (and inoperable). This constituted a double whammy to the huge global warming
establishment. First was the cold, when the "science" had confidently predicted a steadily warming Texas. Second
was the failure of renewables, vastly exacerbating the problems for the energy grid. Within hours the mainstream media
had risen to the challenge. Journalists employed their familiar word games, quickly substituting "climate change" for
global warming. Readers might be a tad confused if they read "The brutal cold striking Texas is emblematic of a world
facing more unpredictable weather due to the rising impact of global warming" but substitute "climate change" for the last
two words and presto, the sentence works. To be sure, that's only because "climate change" is a meaningless term.
Exposing
Fact-Checker "Mistruths" on 2020 Election Lawsuits. Virtually all "fact-checkers" are members of the
Democrat-media complex. They are an important component of the Left's political tactics seeking to discredit contrarian
voices they deem not to be "politically correct" and undermining dissent on Democrat agendas. Not surprisingly,
"fact-checking" has nothing to do with checking the facts, but rather is a tactic to discredit material that effectively
undermines the Democrat-media narrative. A good example is Snopes: [...] Snopes is not alone in their leftwing
bias. The same bias applies to the "fact-checkers" at Politifact, Facebook, Twitter, Washington Post, and other
media-connected checkers and supposed ombudsmen. All are supposedly affiliated with the Poynter Institute for Media
Studies' International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN), but they routinely and blatantly violate the number 1 principle of
ICFN: a commitment to nonpartisanship and fairness. Nothing could be further from the truth.
The
mainstream media's quandary ... and panic. [Scroll down] When mainstream press isn't covering up
information that is damaging to the progressives cause, it fabricates stories against conservatives like the Russian
collusion hoax or reporting that the riot in the Capital on Jan. 6 was an insurrection led by Donald Trump. Both of
these stories were lies from start to finish. But both lead to poisoning the minds of countless Americans against the
president and two impeachments against him. Yet during the summer of 2020, the press presented the Antifa and BLM riots
as mostly peaceful demonstrations.
Everything
is Fake in Utopia. When Democrats gain power through fraud, everything that follows becomes fake as well. [...]
When deception is normalized, tech giants can routinely conceal Biden's unpopularity. On Biden's campaign trail, mass
manipulators scripted questions for audience members to ask him. Not even a month into office, the phony administration
requested its media allies brief them on questions they intend to ask. White House press conferences will still be
theatre, but Jim Acosta will no longer have a part. Our fraud-in-chief was filmed repeating "salute the marines" after
someone likely relayed the command to him through an earpiece. If you ask the fraudsters, Biden actually said
"good-looking marines," and we all misheard him. We're supposed to believe that Biden complimenting the looks of male
marines is more sensical than a party of manipulators secretly telling a senile puppet what to do. I'll take door
number two. When everything is fake, Joe Biden is a "devout Christian" who supports abortion, Black Lives Matter, and
the most radical factions of the LGBTQ lobby. It doesn't matter that these movements are antithetical to Christianity
because fake is the new normal.
Boycott
the Gaslight Media and Save America. There is one major lesson that conservatives and frankly all Americans
must learn: never accept at face value the reporting of any news event. By foolishly acquiescing to the version of
a story put out by the denizens of the mainstream media, the citizenry allows the ruling oligarchy to set the narrative and
exploit the inevitably fabricated incidents that further their cause. In place of "mainstream media," they ought to be
called Gaslight Media, for their role is not to report the truth, but rather to manipulate the public into a mental state
conducive to obedience. [...] These statists are aware that once their version of a story has been repeated ad nauseum for
days or weeks the bulk of the populace will accept it as the truth, thus, achieving near-permanent status in the national
discourse.
The False and Exaggerated
Claims Still Being Spread About the Capitol Riot. What took place at the Capitol on January 6 was undoubtedly a
politically motivated riot. As such, it should not be controversial to regard it as a dangerous episode. Any time
force or violence is introduced into what ought to be the peaceful resolution of political conflicts, it should be lamented
and condemned. But none of that justifies lying about what happened that day, especially by the news media.
Condemning that riot does not allow, let alone require, echoing false claims in order to render the event more menacing and
serious than it actually was. There is no circumstance or motive that justifies the dissemination of false claims by
journalists. The more consequential the event, the less justified, and more harmful, serial journalistic falsehoods
are. Yet this is exactly what has happened, and continues to happen, since that riot almost seven weeks ago.
The
Media Has Been Lying About The Capitol Protests. Look up any story about the storming of the Capitol by Donald
Trump supporters, and you will find it described as a "deadly riot" that killed five people. Worse still, one of the
deaths was that a police officer who — the story goes — was killed by rioters after getting hit in the
head by a fire extinguisher. Then there is the story of the protestor who "carried Zip Ties into the Capitol," which
led to accusations that the protestors intended to take hostages. There have also been endless media descriptions of
the event as an "armed insurrection." And there were stories claiming that, as Reuters put it, "Capitol rioters meant
to 'capture and assassinate' officials." What is common about all of these media-fed narratives? Not one of them
is true.
The False and Exaggerated
Claims Still Being Spread About the Capitol Riot. What took place at the Capitol on January 6 was undoubtedly
a politically motivated riot. As such, it should not be controversial to regard it as a dangerous episode. Any time
force or violence is introduced into what ought to be the peaceful resolution of political conflicts, it should be lamented
and condemned. But none of that justifies lying about what happened that day, especially by the news media.
Condemning that riot does not allow, let alone require, echoing false claims in order to render the event more menacing and
serious than it actually was. There is no circumstance or motive that justifies the dissemination of false claims by
journalists. The more consequential the event, the less justified, and more harmful, serial journalistic falsehoods
are. Yet this is exactly what has happened, and continues to happen, since that riot almost seven weeks ago. And
anyone who tries to correct these falsehoods is instantly attacked with the cynical accusation that if you want only truthful
reporting about what happened, then you're trying to "minimize" what happened and are likely an apologist for if not a
full-fledged supporter of the protesters themselves.
The Impeachment Show.
Lost in the tedium and general lack of interest in the impeachment show put on by the Democrats last week is the general
weirdness of our ruling class. What we see in politics and in the media is presented as if it is completely normal.
No one ever points out the facts or the contradictions with reality. The presenters and their subjects are all
super-serious, as if everything they are saying and doing is completely normal. The reaction to the very peaceful
demonstrations by Trump fans last month is a great example of this weird disconnect. We live in an age where everything
is monitored by millions of mobile-phone cameras. As a result, everyone got to see hours of amateur video shot during
the subdued protests in Washington back in January. Yet the carrying-on by the politicians and media is disconnected
from what we saw online. If you are a left-wing partisan, all of it confirms your belief that Trump is a magical orange
Hitler commanding an invisible army of Hitlers. Of course, for these people, everything confirms this belief.
They are insane.
NYT
Retracts Story First Published on Jan. 8 That Capitol Hill Police Officer Was Killed by a Fire Extinguisher Thrown by
Protesters. Wow, what coincidental timing. The story claiming that a police officer was murdered by Trump
supporters during the Capitol Hill protest on January 6 is, for all practical purposes, retracted by the NYT the day after
Pres. Trump is acquitted on the impeachment charge of having instigated those protests — which were declared
by Democrats and the media an "insurrection" against the government. [...] Julie Strong at American Greatness has been
aggressively pursuing this story for weeks, and two days ago she published a column that noted efforts by media
outlets — including the NYT — to slowly back away from narrative created by the early reporting done by
the NYT and acknowledging that the cause of Sicknick's death was still undetermined. The narrative built around that
early reporting was that he was struck by a demonstrator wielding a fire extinguisher — a narrative advanced by
both liberal and conservative media outlets in their effort to railroad Donald Trump over the past 5 weeks. That
narrative has now unraveled because there simply is no evidence to support the claim that the fire extinguisher episode
actually happened.
The
'Insurrection Hallucination' and How We Got There. It's no secret the media has lots of ways to gaslight
you. One of those is failing to report significant happenings. Another is booking and quoting people whose views
they want to advance because they target those they dislike. Yet another is spreading outright lies, like the
contrafactual assertions that Antifa-BLM riots around the country for the past four years were "mostly peaceful" or that
President Trump wanted people to inject bleach to kill the spreading virus. This week, despite their best efforts, a
lot of those lies and liars have been unmasked.
The
Times' Superspreader Lie About Officer Sicknick. Like so many fabricated storylines intended to damage Donald
Trump and his supporters, the New York Times cited anonymous sources to support a shocking claim in an article
alleging Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick was murdered by a Trump "insurrectionist" on January 6. "[P]ro-Trump
rioters attacked that citadel of democracy, overpowered Mr. Sicknick, 42, and struck him in the head with a fire
extinguisher, according to two law enforcement officials," Times reporters claimed January 8, the day after Sicknick
died. "With a bloody gash in his head, Mr. Sicknick was rushed to the hospital and placed on life support.
He died on Thursday evening." That horrifying account quickly made its way into the vernacular of journalists, lawmakers,
political pundits, and regular Americans without dispute. CNN, as Raheem Kassam detailed here, for weeks repeated the
line as fact. Ditto for MSNBC. In a tirade earlier this week, "Morning Joe" host Joe Scarborough called Donald Trump a
"cop killer" and raged that GOP Senators wouldn't vote to convict. [...] But the narrative about what happened to Sicknick is
quickly unraveling, as I wrote earlier this week. Not only is CNN, the network that helped perpetuate the initial
storyline for more than a month, questioning the circumstances about Sicknick's death, so too is the New York Times.
Our
Tarnished Institutions and the Boy Who Cried Wolf. The only bright side to this situation is that the people
now cannot ignore the lies being pumped out by what we thought were our institutions. We can thank Trump for
that. He said what he would do, and then did it. The contrast to business-as-usual was stunning and
refreshing. We liked it and wanted more of it. Which the swamp could not allow. Russia! Russia!
Russia! Ukraine! Impeachment! Systemic racism! BLM! Pandemic! Insurrection! Is there
a previously-trusted institution which hasn't cried wolf about the bad orange man in the last four years?
Tucker
Carlson Lays out Some Uncomfortable Questions About the Capitol Riot. Recently, RedState reported on a CNN
article that included a very interesting passage regarding the death of Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick, who passed
sometime after the Capitol riot on January 6th. Though a story that he had been beaten to death by a fire extinguisher
had spread far and wide in the media, it turns out that an investigation found no signs of trauma on his body, nor have
investigators been able to find any video of him sustaining wounds that could have taken his life. The latest theory by
investigators is that he may have had a reaction to pepper spray being used that day, though that's purely speculation at
this point. [...] One of the things Tucker talks about is the idea that five people died as a direct result of the riots, a
statement that has been made more times than one can count by the news media. In regards to what we actually know right
now, he notes that one person died of what appears to have been a heart attack while on the phone with his wife.
Another man had a stroke, and there's no evidence he was even part of the riot that day. Another woman died after
passing out, possibly being trampled by the crowd as a result. In other words, of the five people listed as dying that
day due to the riots, three of them were unquestionably accidental.
Jake Tapper and Chris Hayes
Lose Their Minds 'Inciting' Against GOP And Reveal Next Step to Control the Narrative. [Scroll down] The
GOP got "hundred of thousands of Americans" killed? When did that happen? "Then helped a deadly attack on the
Capitol." No, as far as I know, the GOP denounced any violence and were themselves threatened with a bomb at the RNC.
No, actually there wasn't "unprecedented death" for a pandemic. Unfortunately, there are deaths in a pandemic as
there have been all over the world. Had Trump not been in power, if Biden had been there, it would have been far
worse. Biden wouldn't have cut off travel with China and it would have been exponentially worse. "Destruction and
misery and mourning." Yes, there was a lot of that from mostly Democratic lockdowns, where Democrats denied aid, as
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi proved, until after the election, exacting the most harm to the economy believing it could
adversely affect President Donald Trump. There was also a lot of that during the BLM/Antifa riots that the Democrats
not only failed to condemn, but actually embraced by donating to a rioter bail fund, supporting violent rioters over the
people and the police being harmed, and attacking efforts to curtail the riots by law enforcement and the federal government.
Accurate
List of 2020 Election Fraud Cases Shows 81 Cases Total, 30 Still Active. We've heard over and over from Big Media that President
Trump and his team lost numerous court cases linked to the 2020 election. But this is not accurate. Here's what we identified from
our research of an accurate and updated list of court cases:
• There are 81 court cases to date based on the 2020 election
• In 45 cases President Trump was the plaintiff
• In 34 cases President Trump is not the plaintiff
• In 2 cases President Trump is the defendant
• In 72 cases illegal voting is alleged
• In ZERO of the 72 cases where illegal voting is alleged has evidence been allowed to be presented
• 30 cases remain active
CNN
Finally Acknowledges the Story Media Spread About Officer Sicknick's Cause of Death Isn't True. Earlier this
week, the body of Officer Brian Sicknick lay in state in the U.S. Capitol. Everyone honored his life and service.
But the government is having trouble building a murder case there has still not been an official determination as to his
cause of death. After being part of the force during the actions at the Capitol on Jan. 6, he went back to his
office. Some hours later, he collapsed and then later died. But what has been determined is that the story
largely spread about his death, that he was hit by a fire extinguisher by protesters has been discounted, according to a CNN
report, because they found no blunt force trauma to his body and there has been no evidence otherwise found, such as video or
witnesses, that the incident even occurred.
Hit-job journalism
misses the target again. The hit-job interview is a staple of British journalism. There is, I suppose, an
obvious attraction to it: while it can destroy its subject, it can also make the career of a journalist. And yet for
the reader, listener or viewer, it can also be deeply boring — for the simple reason that if the journalist makes
clear their conclusion from the outset, there's no chance of having a reasonable discussion. People who agree with it
rejoice, those who don't switch off. Nothing gets learned; no ideas are properly discussed. Such was the case
with an interview published in last week's Sunday Times by the journalist Decca Aitkenhead. Her subject was Professor
Jordan Peterson, and, like everything to do with Peterson, the interview has kicked up a fair amount of fuss —
principally because it was so mean and hostile.
Crucifying
Jordan Peterson. [Scroll down] Emerging from this nightmare and prepared to step back onto the public
stage, Peterson agreed to a major interview with Decca Aitkenhead for the Sunday Times of London. The story appeared on
January 31; on the same day, Peterson posted on YouTube a recording of the nearly three-hour Zoom conversations that he and
his daughter, Mikhaila, had with Aitkenhead. In the recording (which as of Wednesday had accumulated half a million
hits), Peterson is friendly and forthcoming, but emotionally fragile as a consequence of his long torment; at one point he
breaks into tears and has to step away from the microphone. Mikhaila, for her part, spends an hour and a half telling
Aitkenhead the full story of Peterson's illness, complete with vivid particulars. And Aitkenhead poses throughout as
entirely sympathetic, sounding more like a compassionate social worker than a journalist. But — and this is
why Peterson felt compelled to post the audio of the interview — Aitkenhead's piece for the Times proved to be a
masterpiece of pure snideness and dishonesty. She reduced Peterson's deep learning and richly nuanced wisdom about life
to "bracing advice about how to be a real man." She caricatured the multitudes of people whose lives he's helped to turn
around as "young men who idolise him" as a "fantasy father figure."
The war
on Jordan Peterson. Leftist hatred for the Canadian psychology professor Jordan Peterson is really something to
behold. He stands as an example of what happens to someone who strays from the crazy line of thinking by modern campus
bigots. Mr. Peterson is the canary in the toxic coal mine of political correctness and petty thought police.
Let's start with the professor's crime. Simply put, Mr. Peterson does not share the monolithic, prevailing liberal
orthodoxy on university campuses dictating that Western White males are the world's evil oppressors and anyone who does not
belong to that evil race is a victim trapped in circumstances beyond his or her control.
The
'Big Lie' And Big Liars. There's a media-perpetrated myth that Joe Biden is a moderate; that he's an honest
man. He is not, and never has been. He's a politician, a Democrat, who now has the authority of the United States
government behind him. The Big Lies are spread daily from the podium of the White House press briefing room. Jen
Psaki and her red hair have returned from a CNN contributor gig, and after disseminating lies for the Obama State Department,
this "Ginger Goebbels" freely spouts whatever words fit their needs at the moment. Unbound by reality or any challenge
of the one they paint daily, even when it contradicts the one they painted the day before, the lies just keep getting
bigger. They inherited "no plan" for vaccine distribution? Schools can't reopen unless billions are spent hiring
more teachers when all data shows schools are safe? But they're the "party of science"? No lie is too small to tell,
none too big to swallow, and none are or will be challenged.
Op-ed
calls very real conservative censorship, purge a 'vapid new conspiracy theory' by Rupert Murdoch. From the
left's standpoint, claims that the 2020 presidential election — which was marred by millions of unsolicited
mail-in ballots sent out because of the pandemic — was stolen is a "big lie," insisting there is "no evidence" to
support the assertion. Never mind that three out of four Republicans with eyes that can see believe it to be
true — an anomaly dismissed as just a bunch of rubes being manipulated by former President Donald Trump.
This being the same cabal that insists conservatives are not being censored by Big Tech. No, it's just more
conspiracy-mongering on the right. Just ask Mediaite founding editor Colby Hall, who said in op-ed that "there is a
new dangerous conspiracy afoot, and it's being amplified by arguably the most important person in all of political media:
Fox Corporation chairman Rupert Murdoch."
Stop
credulously calling China a 'people's republic'. The effect of re-labeling is well known, and it is widely used
by the politicians. [...] Oppressive regimes, aware of the power of labels, use them to their full advantage, and include
positive labels right into the official names of their states. Names like "United States" or the "Russian Federation"
tell you little about those countries' political organization, but how about words like "democracy" or "republic"? I
started wondering, why do we in the West parrot those words even when they are manifestly misleading? Is there really a
"Peoples' Republic of China"? In the huge geographic area so designated, people have zero input into how they are
governed. This is decided for them by the all-seeing, all-knowing, all-wise chairman of the Communist Party. So
why not call it — in the Western press at least — the "Communist Dictatorship of China"?
The Media Told
Us a Violent Revolt Was Coming. What Happened? It is worth noting today that media outlets are reporting
Joe Biden will serve his first full day as President of the United States, and no American cities are burning. No one
is calling for the end of the Republic. America still stands. [...] We have been told conservatives were going to revolt,
trying to overthrow a fairly elected incoming President. Instead, what we saw yesterday was a peaceful transfer of
power. Alleged flyers calling for an armed protest never happened. The protests at 50 state capitals never
materialized. It's like all these hyped-up mini-revolutions were never going to happen, but some people who are
not conservatives needed for these events to happen to further their own agenda. Let's get something
straight: The armed mob that attacked the Capitol building was not representative of the 75 million people
who voted for Donald Trump in November.
Media
trust hits new low. For the first time ever, fewer than half of all Americans have trust in traditional media,
according to data from Edelman's annual trust barometer shared exclusively with Axios. Trust in social media has hit an
all-time low of 27%. 56% of Americans agree with the statement that "Journalists and reporters are purposely trying to
mislead people by saying things they know are false or gross exaggerations." 58% think that "most news organizations
are more concerned with supporting an ideology or political position than with informing the public." When Edelman
re-polled Americans after the election, the figures had deteriorated even further, with 57% of Democrats trusting the media
and only 18% of Republicans.
Trust
In Media At All Time Low: Majority Believe Reporters Purposefully Trying To Mislead People. Each year,
the American people seem to trust the media less and less. This year's annual survey from Edelman shows trust in
traditional media and social media are at all-time lows. The annual trust barometer, shared exclusively with Axios,
found fewer than half of Americans trust traditional media for the first time since the survey began.
GOP
Leaders in D.C. Don't Represent 74 Million Trump Voters. The media lie. All the time. They lied
about former President Barack Obama's economy; they tried to make us believe the worst economy since the Great Depression was
a great economy. Then they lied about President Donald Trump's soaring economy. They tried to make us believe the
best economy in 50 years, maybe the best economy ever for middle-class Americans, was a bad economy. They lied about
the Black Lives Matter riots. For months, we saw radical communists, Marxists and violent thugs riot, loot, burn, mug
and murder while attacking police officers with bricks, pipes and Molotov cocktails. They burned entire downtown business
districts to the ground, such as those in Minneapolis and Kenosha, Wisconsin. [...] They killed over 30 people.
They caused over $2 billion in damage. Yet liberal politicians and the liberal media ignored it all, or made
believe it never happened, or made believe it was "peaceful," or encouraged it, or supported it. In many cases, they
did all of the above.
Media
Lie About Supposed Capitol Hill Attacker, Here's the Real Story. It's almost like the mainstream media want to
raise the temperature and stoke unsubstantiated fear. Actually, I'm pretty sure that's exactly what they want to
do. That was made apparent again today after a lie was trumpeted by several major media outlets before being shown to
be mostly false. I'm talking about the story that a man provided "fake" inauguration credentials while carrying 500
rounds of handgun ammunition on his person in an attempt to enter the Capitol area. This was supposed to be proof of an
elevated threat, with the assumption being that this guy was there to shoot the place up as a probable QAnon disciple.
The real story is way, way less exciting.
In
today's America, the wise person willfully suspends belief. Twenty years ago, I believed most of what came over
the nation's airwaves. Ten years ago, I was becoming quite the skeptic. Today, after years of unrelenting attacks
on the President, I don't believe any of it. It's all lies, half-truths, and misinformation, designed to influence
elections and steer the collective mentality toward accepting the loss of freedom, the loss of constitutional rights and,
eventually, to embrace communist ideas and authoritarian policies. I'm not sure when it all went south, but I think it
was probably long before I first became aware that there was a problem.
Trump,
supporters likened to Nazis, Saddam's Ba'ath Party in cable-news demonization duel. President Trump and his
supporters were likened to dictators, despots, terrorists, and genocidal maniacs this week by dueling cable news competitors
and elected officials. MSNBC viewers watched programming on Wednesday with analogies to the Ba'ath Party under Iraqi
dictator Saddam Hussein, while CNN's were warned about large amounts of "Nazis" and "Klan" members permeating the Republican
Party. The cable news punditry was punctuated by Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell of California likening Mr. Trump
to the terrorist who orchestrated the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks — Osama bin Laden — during an
interview with "PBS NewsHour."
Three
crucial questions remain unanswered about Capitol siege. One thing recent history has taught America is the
first storyline of major tragedies or controversies is never the most accurate. Americans were told by the Bush
administration that they were sucker-punched by a surprise attack on 9/11 by terrorists, only to learn the CIA and FBI had
significant advance evidence of the plot and its players and failed to connect the dots. Susan Rice originally told the
nation that the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi was carried out spontaneously by a mob angered by an anti-Muslim
video. The attack, it turned out, was pre-planned and carried out by an al-Qaeda-aligned terror group in Libya.
The country was assured Christopher Steele's dossier provided credible evidence of Donald Trump colluding with Russia, when
in fact the CIA and FBI knew almost immediately it was uncorroborated and based in part on Russian disinformation. And
now just a week after the heinous and deadly siege of the U.S. Capitol, the final narrative of what actually happened is
still being written, revised and unmasked.
We Need a New Media System.
Media firms work backward. They first ask, "How does our target demographic want to understand what's just unfolded?"
Then they pick both the words and the facts they want to emphasize. It's why Fox News uses the term, "Pro-Trump
protesters," while New York and The Atlantic use "Insurrectionists." [...] What happened last Wednesday was
the apotheosis of the Hate Inc. era, when this audience-first model became the primary means of communicating facts to
the population. For a hundred reasons dating back to the mid-eighties, from the advent of the Internet to the
development of the 24-hour news cycle to the end of the Fairness Doctrine and the Fox-led discovery that news can be sold as
character-driven, episodic TV in the manner of soap operas, the concept of a "Just the facts" newscast designed to be
consumed by everyone died out.
Is
Truth Irrelevant? It is amazing how many people seem to have discovered last Wednesday that riots are
wrong — when many of those same people apparently had not noticed that when riots went on, for weeks or even
months, in various cities across the country last year. For too many people, especially in the media, what is right and
wrong, true or false, depends on who it helps or hurts politically. Too many media people who are supposed to be
reporters act as if they are combatants in political wars. Someone once said that, in a war, truth is the first
casualty. That has certainly been so in the media — and in much of academia as well.
Media Have Hypocritical Double Standard
on Trump vs BLM Protests. Wednesday was proof that how corporate media and Democrat politicians report and
comment on acts of civil unrest depends upon who is engaged in the rioting. Six months ago The New York Times, which
has been described as the national "newspaper of record," made excuses for rioters who attempted to take over the federal
courthouse in Portland, Oregon. It reported that "the nightly assault on the federal courthouse has been part of a much
wider peaceful resistance ... that began assembling nearly two months ago in the wake of George Floyd's death at the hands of
the Minneapolis police." The Times continued, "the aim, as it has been in other cities, was to assemble for sweeping
police reform and racial justice." Reporting on Wednesday's protest in Washington, D.C., The Times' "peaceful resistance"
suddenly became a "mob." Instead of "assembling," the protesters engaged in "rampage" and "chaos," incited by President
Trump, which became a "part of his legacy."
Enough!
There Was No Riot, Insurrection or "Storming!" Enough! Enough of the gaslighting by the press.
Enough of the gaslighting by the party of slavery, Jim Crow, the KKK, want, deprivation, envy and murder of the unborn in the
womb. Most especially, enough of their "Republican," enablers, who believe they can gain political favor or DC cocktail
circuit invites, by promoting these blatant lies. What is even more egregious, these lies have already become,
"common knowledge." [...] Aside from a couple of bozos who broke a window to get in, I clearly saw Capitol Police
opening doors for protestors to enter, while appearing to cordially chat with them as they strolled through the building.
Only
In Your Imagination Was That An Attempted "Coup". At no point yesterday was the American government at risk of
being "overthrown," as members of Congress have laughably suggested. Per usual, our guardians of consensus can't bring
themselves to describe what unfolded with any degree of dispassion or calm. Instead we're told by the incoming Senate
Majority Leader, for example, that January 6, 2021 will now "live in infamy" right alongside December 7, 1941. Elected
officials issued emotional notices that they were "okay," like they had just narrowly avoided being crushed in an earthquake,
or escaped the World Trade Center on 9/11. This is made all the more odd because the only person upon whom lethal force
was committed appears to have been a Trump-supporting woman who was shot point-blank in the throat by a Capitol Hill police
officer. She's now dead. Congress was temporarily inconvenienced. Journalists and pundits, glorying in their
natural state — which is to peddle as much free-flowing hysteria as possible — eagerly invoke all the
same rhetoric that they'd abhor in other circumstances on civil libertarian grounds. "Domestic terrorism," "insurrection,"
and other such terms now being promoted by the corporate media will nicely advance the upcoming project of "making sure
something like this never happens again." Use your imagination as to what kind of remedial measures that will entail.
Things
That Need to Be Said About Today's Chaos in D.C.. [Scroll down] Secondly, it's fascinating that the media
and Democrats have all of a sudden figured out that violence and rioting are wrong and should be condemned. We all
remember how for months last year they painted violent Antifa/BLM rioters and agitators as "peaceful protesters" even as
businesses were looted and burned to the ground, entire city blocks were turned to ashes, federal courthouses and officers
were attacked with incendiary devices, and neighborhoods were invaded.
Just
What Were You Expecting? [Scroll down] Whether walking on the street or gathered on the Capitol steps,
people were waving flags and as far as I could see, nobody was throwing punches. Nobody was throwing bricks or Molotov
cocktails. In fact, one video clip I found very interesting, was one group of protestors who managed to gain entry to
the Capitol Building, was walking/strolling through Statuary Hall, and they were all staying inside the velvet guide ropes
running down the center!! Nobody toppled any statues over or anything like that. Surely not some "maddened mob" as
the media kept hyping all afternoon long. Here are some things that bother me. First of all, the media. The
way they were hyping this, you would think there was an all out assault by heavily armed rioters, hell bent on killing
everyone inside the building. The media kept using the words, "shots fired," implying that the "mob" had shot somebody,
maybe even a policeman. Turns out, it was a Capitol policeman who shot an unarmed female protestor.
C-SPAN
Brings Steve Scully Back After He Admitted To Lying About Debate-Related Incident. C-SPAN announced on Tuesday
that it is bringing back disgraced host Steve Scully effective immediately despite Scully's admission, last year, that he
lied about a debate-related incident that unfolded on social media. Last October, before the second presidential
debate, Scully falsely claimed that he had been hacked after a tweet appeared on his Twitter account that solicited advice
from Trump opponent Anthony Scaramucci about how to deal with President Donald Trump at the debate, which he was set to host.
Cosmopolitan
now promotes obesity as 'healthy'. After decades of promoting stick-thin, big-cleavage women as sexy, Cosmopolitan women's
magazine has a new schtick: Promoting obese women as healthy. [...] They use young women of course, whose bodies can probably resist
many of the problems of obesity at first. That's a deception, because obesity eventually accumulates in problems if it's not eventually
gotten rid of. But this isn't stopping Cosmo. Its obesity-is-healthy claim is about as accurate as the other falsehoods going
around — that men can become women, or that racism causes COVID. It's fantasyland stuff, and coming more and more from the
left. So much for "following the science."
The
media are lying about Trump's phone call with Raffensperger. The mainstream media and Georgia's secretary of
state, Brad Raffensperger, are utterly disgraceful, dishonest, and manipulative people. Raffensperger released a
private phone call that the media immediately claimed — falsely — showed Trump begging Raffensperger to
fraudulently find enough votes for Trump to win. In fact, Trump called Raffensperger to get him to stop obstructing the
fraud investigation. [...] Here's what really happened on the phone call. First, Trump wasn't the only person on the
phone. Also present were Mark Meadows, Mike Pompeo, and multiple attorneys. There isn't the slightest chance that
they would have allowed Trump to beg Raffensperger for illegal votes or to threaten him. Second, contrary to what the
media implied, Trump was not operating off the premise that he lost Georgia. If that had been the case, it would indeed
have been wrong for Trump to beg for Raffensperger to "find" votes for him. Instead, Trump was operating from the
assertion that he won Georgia.
Gallup
Poll Shows Most Americans Share Trump's Lack of Trust in Honesty of Media. One important public service
President Donald Trump has performed for the American people has been to pull the veneer back and fully expose the incredible
bias of the establishment media. Only 28 percent of Americans surveyed by Gallup last month rated the honesty and
ethical standards of journalists as either "very high" or "high." Contrast that with police officers, who earned a
combined 52 percent rating in those categories, down just 2 percentage points from 2019, despite the massive "defund the
police" protests nationwide.
Biden
is Not 'President-Elect' Until Congress Counts Electoral Votes on January 6, 2021. Let us say it all together,
"Joe Biden is not the president-elect." Americans have been bombarded with fake news about Biden's status in the 2020
presidential election. Facebook, Twitter, CNN, MSNBC, ABC, PBS have all declared Biden the winner. But this is
far from over. We have reported on massive election fraud from multiple sources. The media refuses to do so,
therefore we must tell the truth. [Video clip]
How
to Steal an Election in Four Steps. [Scroll down] In truth, President Trump likely received between
74.5 million and 76.5 million votes, winning both the popular vote and the electoral vote handily. The media
reported none of this, except anecdotally as Republican griping. They reported that Biden had won, and that he was the
president-elect, though he was not because the count was still in progress. Major broadcast media refused to carry
important updates by the President of the United States and ridiculed anyone who questioned the integrity of the
election: Trump was a cry baby: Giuliani was unbalanced; Sidney Powell was a conspiracy theorist. When Fox
News chose to ignore stark reality in favor of the lie (Tucker Carlson accused Powell — perhaps the most respected
attorney in Washington — of making claims she could not substantiate) it lost a huge chunk of its viewership to
Newsmax and OANN, networks on which the news is not scripted in advance. The Left went into, "Why can we all just get
along" mode. "A time for healing," said the newspapers. They defended mail-in voting, the count stoppages,
Dominion software, etc. Evidence did not matter to them, only selling the narrative that Biden was the victor.
They enlisted the help of Trump-hating Republicans like Mitt Romney, Chris Christi, and Paul Ryan to implore Trump, the
overwhelming winner, to concede.
5
Reasons Why You're Not Crazy to Question the Election Results. You've gotten the memo from the leftist
chin-strokers on social media. It's simple. You're insane for questioning the 2020 presidential election
result. Joe Biden is the president-elect, so you just run along and ignore the copious news stories about election
fraud and get over it. Man up! Political titans on Capitol Hill look visibly concerned when asked by MSM
reporters about the president and his millions of voters who aren't convinced that this election wasn't filled with
fraud. The party of Governor Stacey Abrams, President Hillary Clinton, and "Joe Biden should not concede under any
circumstances" dares to point the magenta cat-toy-feather-wand of shame at Republicans who can't believe that the candidate
with the most momentum and the power of the incumbency didn't win. You're not wrong. And you're not crazy.
The
Trump-Hating Media Prepare For A Long Nap Under Biden. [Scroll down] The national media are, by virtually
any recognized metric, now collectively far to the left on the political spectrum. They hate Trump, capitalism,
America's history and culture, and all the blue-collar, hard-working, tax-paying schlubs out there who make it all
possible. The media began the year in COVID-19 denial, pretending, along with leading Democrats, that the
fast-spreading virus was nothing to worry about. They quickly did an about-face after realizing that virus could be
weaponized politically against Trump. Since then, Americans have been subjected to non-stop propaganda on everything
from vaccines and hydroxychloroquine to lockdowns and mandatory masks. The goal: weaken Trump, and turn Americans into
terrified "yes" people, subservient to bureaucrat-scientists such as Anthony Fauci. That's what's also behind the media
campaign to blame Trump, not the communist Chinese, for the novel coronavirus. No sooner had the virus emerged than the
media were reporting that Trump had "slashed" Centers for Disease Control spending, implying he had left us vulnerable.
Wrong. His budgets increased CDC spending every year.
This
Tennessee Data for Masked vs. Unmasked Counties Would Be on Every Front Page, if the Results Were
Different. As you may have heard, we've sort of got a "casedemic" problem here in Tennessee. That means
lots and lots (and lots) of people are testing positive for COVID-19. That's about all we know for sure, of course.
Nevertheless, hand-wringing from media, politicians, and local 'health authorities' is seemingly neverending, as are local
reporters in my neck of the woods being filmed standing in front of that FEMA body truck they don't bother to tell us has
been sitting in front of the regional hospital, unused, SINCE MARCH. Hospitals aren't overwhelmed by any measure, and even
the death toll isn't really all that impressive either considering that Tennessee is actually below the national average in
deaths per million and most people who are dying are either already super old or super sick. Indeed, while COVID does
tragically hit some people hard, most 'cases' are quite mild and often non-symptomatic, driven by panic at every sniffle or
people being forced to test for work and other reasons. And there is increasingly solid evidence that not everyone
counted as a 'COVID death' is really a death caused by COVID, but rather someone who had a positive PCR test at some point in
2020 before dying. When you have a highly contagious respiratory virus going around, particularly one that is seasonal
and seems to be boxing out the flu, an increasing percentage of those who die will likely have it. These 'scary'
numbers lie at the root of the ongoing panic and give continued justification for our overlords to continue to exercise
control over society.
Soviet-Style
Media Propaganda in America. Pick a theme from the last four years: Trump-Russia collusion, Trump has
told a bazillion lies, Trump is an authoritarian, Trump will get us into a war with North Korea, it's impossible for Trump to
get a vaccine by the end of the year. Yada yada yada. All of these things and more — including themes that have
nothing whatsoever to do with Trump — were flatly untrue. Which, in a society where the media is honest, would have
been reported by that media. A real media this minute would be investigating the results of the 2020 election and
whether or not the President and his supporters are correct that there was indeed at least some election fraud. But, of
course, that's not what the media is doing. They simply ignore the evidence, repeatedly label the very idea of voter
fraud "baseless" — and move on.
Mike
Pompeo slams reporter over coverage of wife's alleged COVID diagnosis. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo is
slamming a reporter over the handling of coverage of his wife's alleged COVID-19 diagnosis. In a series of tweets
Thursday, the nation's top diplomat refuted a now-deleted post which claimed that he and wife Susan Pompeo had attended a
State Department holiday party one day before testing positive. "My wife and I did not attend any State Department nor
White House holiday parties — your statement is patently FALSE," Pompeo wrote. "This isn't journalism and
it's worse than gossip — it's unethical and potentially unlawful. Stay tuned." After Bloomberg reporter
Nicholas Wadhams took down the tweet, Pompeo posted a screenshot along with a message reading, "Good to see this
tweet — with patently false information — was deleted. I won't hold my breath for an apology."
Are
Democrats In Trouble In 2022? [Scroll down] [W]hat Democrats like Adam Nagourney determinedly call
"protests against police abuses" consist largely of arson, assault and looting. Nothing says "I'm against police
abuses" like looting a pharmacy, liquor store or jewelry store. There is a reason why countless stores in urban areas
were boarded up, and in many cases remain boarded up, and the reason isn't that someone is "protesting against police
abuses." Further, Democrats in a number of cities, like Seattle, Portland, Chicago and Minneapolis, proved to be so
sympathetic to rioters that they were unwilling to take effective measures to stop them. Voters noticed. One more
thing: Nagourney's statement that riots, looting and arson were "heavily covered on local television" is revealing.
The [New York] Times, the Washington Post, the Associated Press, the broadcast networks and other reliable Democratic outlets
tried to suppress information about the riots that took place across the country, precisely so that such information would not
damage the Democratic Party. But they failed, mostly on account of local news coverage, which was less dedicated to the
Democratic cause and more interested in letting viewers know what was going on.
Tainted
Tallies Tell Tall Tales. [Scroll down] Speaking on an episode of War Room: Pandemic, [Rudy]
Giuliani asserted that the American people have not yet had the opportunity to examine evidence that appears to have
corrupted some vote counts in key battleground states. "Facts have been kept from them," Giuliani declared. "Not
a single court decision has had a hearing yet. They haven't heard from a single witness. They haven't looked at a
single tape. They haven't listened to a single recording. There are thousands of them." Amber Athey voiced
the sentiments of many when she wrote, "The media has been claiming since the election ended that President Trump's claims of
voter fraud are 'baseless' and 'without evidence'. That just is not true. The President's lawyer gave examples of
[voter fraud.] ... But everyone is too busy mocking him to pay attention." [...] A December 2020 Fox News national survey of
registered voters found that 68% of Republicans, 26% of independents, and 10% of Democrats believe that the election was
stolen from Trump.
Print this article and save it before it goes down the Memory Hole. Yes,
It Was a Stolen Election. As Americans continue to watch the 2020 election controversy unfold, the very same
publications that spent years lying about President Trump's "Russia collusion" are once again telling us what we are
dutifully supposed to believe. The Los Angeles Times, for instance, assures us that Trump's "baseless" and
"dangerous" claim "that the election was rigged to benefit Joe Biden" has been thoroughly "debunked." The New York
Times proclaims that "Trump's false election fraud claims" are founded upon nothing more than a "torrent of falsehoods."
Sneering at "how Trump drove the lie that the election was stolen," The Washington Post mocks Republicans who "are
still pretending that there was election fraud." And CNN.com warns that "Trump's obsession with overturning the
election" has now begun to spiral "out of control." But so much for what the comic books have to say. What
follows is a compilation of vital facts that will demonstrate, to anyone interested in following the truth wherever it may
lead, that the 2020 presidential election was indeed rife with fraud, and that Joe Biden, if he should in fact be sworn into
office next month, will be an illegitimate president from the very start.
A thread on this viral map, which attempts to paint a
very scary picture. [D]epending on where you live, it is almost certain someone at your Thanksgiving gathering will have COVID.
Look at all that red! But, the map has massive problems. The map comes from the Washington Post, but it is based on the COVID-19 Event
Risk Assessment Planning tool from GA Tech. The goal of which is to show what the chances are of having a COVID positive person attend a
gathering. A worthwhile project. [...] This is the Washington Post map, side by side with the map from the actual data source. Same map,
but Wapo makes the "artistic" choice of making the reds much darker and scarier. [...] The larger problem lies at the bottom of the Wapo map.
It says the map "assumes actual case prevalence is 10 times as high as laboratory-confirmed case count." This, for lack of a better word,
is bonkers.
The Vaccine
Naysayers Got It Wrong. Today I'm reminded of the host of media experts who flogged the seriousness and
reliability of the Steele dossier for months and years only to evaporate when we later learned that document wasn't
reliable. To his great credit, the Washington Post's Erik Wemple devoted 10 articles to tracking down some of the
dossier's promoters and asking them how they felt about it in retrospect. As I pointed out at the time, a lot of the
journalists he spoke with had no comment. People like MSNBC's Rachel Maddow, who made the dossier a key part of her
program for years simply moved on to greener pastures. There was zero price to pay for being so wrong for so long
about something so important. I'm reminded of that today because of this Twitter thread by Glenn Greenwald highlighted by
Twitchy. Greenwald points out that some of the same outlets flogging the the dossier were also confident that a vaccine
by the end of the year was a pipe dream. Stop and enjoy the smug condescension in this first clip from MSNBC:
[Video clip]
When Journalism started to die.
Some conservatives may believe that the Fourth Estate lost its luster in the '90s and signed its integrity over to the
Democrat Party, but the death throes came much earlier during the Vietnam War. We lost over 58k casualties in that war
and it is the only military conflict that we walked away from. Yet the truth is that we never lost a major battle in
Vietnam, even Barack Obama admitted that fact. We lost the war over here, thanks to the fake news spread here by the
most trusted man in America, Walter Cronkite. [...] Don't know much about his personal beliefs but he blatantly lied about
the war and the Tet offensive. Until Cronkite's public verdict that the 1968 Tet offensive was a "defeat" for the U.S.
the majority of Americans supported our nation's involvement. Cronkite falsely claimed that the Vietcong had held the
American embassy for six hours and that the offensive "went on for two months." The facts show that Tet was actually a
major defeat for the communist enemy[.]
Frauds:
The Election, Media, Congressional Dems, and the FBI. The first of this week's two biggest stories was Friday
evening's action by the Supreme Court refusing to hear the lawsuit brought by Texas and other states respecting the evident
fraud in the balloting in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Michigan. [...] The second most significant matter, in my
view, was the clear gaslighting the media and former intelligence officials carried out on the Hunter Biden story, hiding the
fact that he's been under criminal investigation since 2018 for bribery, tax evasion, and money laundering from, among other
sources, China. Drew Holden and Arthur Schwartz rounded up the evidence of this gaslighting. That it was
effective in its bad faith effort at keeping relevant information about Chinese bribery of the Biden family and their
consummate corruption in time to affect the election is clear. One survey reports that nearly 10% of those who voted
for Biden in key states would not have had they known about this scandal which the major media deeply hid from them.
Video:
TV Journalists Flat-Out Lying About Hunter Biden's Laptop. For almost a week, liberal cable and broadcast
networks have ignored the FBI saying it has "nothing to add" to DNI Ratcliffe's assessment that the alleged Hunter Biden
laptop is not part of a Russian disinformation campaign. Despite these statements from both Ratcliffe and the FBI, TV
journalists continued to warn viewers that the entire story looks like a Russian intelligence op. The media have been
defending Biden and his son from the President's attacks for as long as Trump has been making them. Just over a year
ago, when allegations surfaced that Biden had interfered in Ukrainian politics for personal gain, journalists and reporters
insisted tirelessly that there was "no evidence" that the former Vice President "had done anything wrong."
[Video clip]
Will
Anyone Face Any Consequences For Gaslighting Americans On The Hunter Biden Story? So now that it is
overwhelmingly evident the New York Post's initial Hunter and Jim Biden story wasn't based on hacked material, wasn't Russian
misinformation, is clearly something people deserved to know before voting, and that big tech and America's corporate media
tried to make sure that didn't happen — and that once again rather than alter their behavior or ask for
forgiveness, they're going to instead attempt to gaslight you about all of it — I have a number of
questions. First, when did Joe Biden first learn that his repeated claims the stories about his son and his brother
were Fake News — or in his phrasing, debunked, smears, and the like — were in fact false? When
was he briefed on this exactly, and by whom? And why, given that every effort was made to distance Hunter from the
campaign, did the defensive announcement come from the Transition instead of just from Hunter himself if Joe, as he has
always claimed, has nothing to do with this?
Here
Are All The Times Joe Biden Falsely Claimed Stories About Hunter Were Debunked. For months, former Vice
President Joe Biden has vehemently denied that any evidence exists that his son, Hunter, was involved in criminal activity or
wrongdoing. These denials now look like dishonesty after the Biden-Harris transition team released a statement
Wednesday [12/9/2020] acknowledging that Hunter is indeed under investigation by the Department of Justice for potential tax
crimes. "I learned yesterday for the first time that the U.S. Attorney's Office in Delaware advised my legal counsel,
also yesterday, that they are investigating my tax affairs," Hunter wrote in the statement. This news, as Federalist
Editor Mollie Hemingway pointed out, is not actually new and was reported before the election, but was purposefully suppressed
by gatekeepers like Facebook, Twitter, and corporate media outlets who ignored the reporting on Hunter Biden's affairs.
How
to Steal an Entire Country. Investigations and impeachments have been blasted forcefully into our faces for
years, thanks to the author of the MSM's Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), Joseph Goebbels, of Third Reich fame, who
said, "The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind
constantly — it must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over. ... A lie told once remains a
lie but a lie told a thousand times becomes the truth." It appears he also wrote the SOPs for Facebook, one of which is
clearly "propaganda works best when those who are being manipulated are confident they are acting on their own free will."
Now, all across the MSM, Biden's "victory" consequences are given the fait accompli treatment. We should all
just behave and accept reality. It sounds and reads like this: "Trump is baselessly contesting the results."
"Trump campaign court cases have been thrown out due to baseless claims." All the "doing" is from the Trump side, and it's
wasting everyone's time. The Democrats haven't done a thing, obviously. They are the innocent victims, once again,
of Trump's craziness. "Meanwhile, President-Elect Biden saw his shadow again today." There is nothing baseless
about what happened.
Setting the Stage
for Revolution. The 2020 election had a series of unprecedented results, any one of which would be a
miracle. For example, Trump increased his vote by 17% and lost, which has never happened in American history.
There was a 20% increase in the vote, something else that has never happened in electoral history. Compounding all of
this is the stunning dishonesty we are seeing. The media lies so much that they have become worthless at news
reporting. Outside of sports scores, nothing they "report" can be accepted at face value. In fact, the prudent
way to consume American media now is to just assume what they are saying is false. At least one possible option is
eliminated as you guess at the truth.
Australian
pundits not buying American media's mantra, call claims of no evidence or fraud 'a lie'. President Donald Trump
is getting some support for his claims of voter fraud from as far away as Australia. Some members of the media in the
land down under are openly challenging the premature crowning of Democrat Joe Biden as the winner of the 2020 presidential
election, accusing the press in the U.S. of "willfully" misleading the public with the "lie" that Trump has lost his
reelection bid.
Did
President Trump Spring a Trap on Treasonous Democrats on Election Night? So certain were the complicit media of
a win for Clinton that they predicted a 95% probability of her winning. But the same blunder — born of
Democrat arrogance and overconfidence from years of triumphant cheating — would not occur a second time in 2020.
The media would, during Trump's first term as president, embark on creating the illusion that the most popular president
since Ronald Reagan was actually reviled. This Big Lie would be endlessly repeated, in hopes of making enough people
believe a loss to Biden was in the cards for Trump.
Media
Childishly Dismissive of Gettysburg Vote Fraud Hearing. The mainstream media, rather than cover in any real
detail the serious allegations of voting fraud that were presented at a Gettysburg hearing of the Pennsylvania Senate
Majority Policy Committee on Wednesday, instead mocked and dismissed the event. CNN made no effort to hide its extreme
bias over the hearing in its headline which described it as a "baseless voter fraud event," "Trump invites Pennsylvania GOP
lawmakers to White House after calling in to baseless voter fraud event." In addition, the story put "hearing" in quotes
so as to present it as somehow not a real hearing.
Don't Give
an Inch. For five years, the Democratic party and their allies in the corporate media, the coddled government
bureaucracies, and the Big Tech platforms have fought Trump with every weapon at their disposal. They uncritically and
feverishly repeated every deranged theory that Trump was really a Russian asset operating as Putin's Manchurian candidate,
and then cheered on his impeachment for it. [...] Media outlets that breathlessly ran with a fake story about Trump killing
an entire pond of koi fish refused to cover the violent riots that broke out across the country this summer. They stood
in front of buildings that were literally on fire, claiming the protests were "fiery, but mostly peaceful." They told us that
border walls don't stop illegal immigration, riots don't spread COVID-19 (but schools and church services do), and Joe Biden
would win in a landslide.
'Antifa: Rise of
the Black Flags' Shows the Chaos, Anarchy Hatched by an 'Idea'. Director David Lugo has a warning for the
mainstream media. Citizen journalists are coming, ready to counter the false narratives peddled by the press. In
a way, Lugo is part of that movement. His new film, "Antifa: Rise of the Black Flags," captures the threats posed
by what one presidential candidate flippantly called an "idea." That "idea" has trashed cities across the country, and
there's little indication Antifa will stand down in 2021. [Video clip]
Why
is challenging suspicious election results 'a threat to our democracy'? On Thursday, President Trump's legal
team presented many pieces of information about the election that deserve to be investigated. But the media have no
interest in that. Instead, they essentially black out the news and ask Trump to concede so they can crown their chosen
king. Worst of all, they continue to falsely claim there is no evidence of fraud. The New York Times and others
have written about the potential fraud on universal mail-in ballots in the past, as have other outlets, but now they call
Trump a liar. The media outlets know that rules were changed to make verification of mail-in ballots less verifiable,
but they don't care.
Flat Out TDS: Media Is Already
Trying to Erase Trump Being President. News broke yesterday [11/20/2020] that President Donald Trump's son,
Donald Trump, Jr. had tested positive for the Wuhan coronavirus. Now most normal people on both sides of the aisle
would wish him well, perhaps even telling the president they wished his son well. Not so much Yahoo. Here's the
headline from the Yahoo article about the news: Former reality TV show host's son tests positive for COVID-19.
Yes, that's how they're now trying to describe President Donald Trump. They're so incapable of accepting the reality
they can't even put it in a headline and they're hoping to obliterate his presidency simply by obstinacy.
Democrats
And Media Are Reaping Fruit Of 4 Years Of Anti-Trump Conspiracy Theories. A prominent liberal legal academic
who spent the last four years pushing outrageous, discredited, and debunked conspiracy theories about Donald Trump stealing
the 2016 election said on Fox News Sunday that refusal to accept the legitimacy of the 2020 presidential election threatens
the country. "He is undermining democracy because there are millions of people who will believe him even though there
is nothing to his arguments and no evidence to back them," Harvard Law professor Laurence Tribe said of President Trump's
litigation regarding the November election. [...] Tribe began pushing the Russia collusion theory on July 25, 2016, well
after the Hillary Clinton campaign had secretly developed and begun running its "Russia collusion" campaign operation, but
before the FBI had started its Crossfire Hurricane investigation. "I'm not into conspiracy," he wrote, before
suggesting Russian oligarchs had compromised Trump with business deals and made him develop a foreign policy that U.S. allies
should be responsible for more of their own anti-Russian defense budgets. A follow-up tweet said Trump was hiding his
tax returns in order to hide his business relationship with Vladimir Putin. By July 28, 2016, Tribe was wondering if
Trump had committed the capital crime of "treason." By July 29, 2016, he was proposing wringing Trump on charges of
violating the Logan Act. On October 17, 2016, he began suggesting Trump had rigged the election against Clinton.
A
Vegas oddsmaker's take on Fox News and the election grift. [Scroll down] At that point, something very
weird occurred. It didn't happen at CNN or MSNBC, it happened at Fox News. You all remember that Fox refused to
call Florida, Ohio, or Texas for Trump, even though Trump was miles ahead in those three states. Additionally, even
though Trump was also significantly ahead in Virginia, Fox nevertheless called the state for Biden. But that wasn't the
worst: ["]And then it happened. It was the most bizarre call in Election Night history. Fox News called
Arizona for Biden. Why? It wasn't even close to over. There was no reason on earth to make that call.
Arizona is STILL not over 8 days later. CNN still hasn't awarded Arizona. ABC pulled it back from Biden only
24 hours ago.["]
There is evidence,
actually. The media has been claiming since the election ended that President Trump's claims of voter fraud are
'baseless' and 'without evidence'. That just is not true. The President's lawyer gave examples of it during today's
press conference at the Republican National Committee headquarters in Washington DC. But everyone is too busy mocking him to
pay attention. I tried to listen to what Giuliani actually said and not what he looked like or the characterization of him
by the rest of the media. The cameras started feverishly clicking the first time he wiped the sweat from his face,
all but guaranteeing that would be the focus of the presser. Giuliani did in fact present evidence of voter fraud today
but many people simply didn't want to hear it. He cited multiple Americans, one by name, who have signed sworn
affidavits stating that they witness some type of fraud, whether it was pro-Trump ballots being thrown out without cause,
ballots being backdated to before the election, poll workers being told not to ask voters for identification, and more.
Vainglory of the Press.
Of all the claims that have been made in this election, the most astounding is the idea that the proper authority to certify
the winner — and dispose of all objections — is the press. That would be the same press that
proved to be so inaccurate in respect of what would happen in the past two elections. It is now in high dudgeon over
the fact that millions of Americans lack for confidence in its decision to call the race for Mr. Biden. What
vainglory. "Day by day," the Washington Post editorializes this morning, "President Trump's efforts to overturn the
results of a free and fair election grow more brazen." Notice the en passant nature of its reference to the election
being free and fair. It dasn't acknowledge even a possibility that determining the freeness and fairness of the blasted
election is the point of all the challenges and litigation.
Chaos and Anarchy in
DC. In case you missed it, over the weekend tens of thousands of protesters marched in the District of Columbia
to voice their support of the president and opposition to voter fraud. The "Million MAGA March," held Saturday
afternoon, was a peaceful event. But as the sun went down and the pro-Trump demonstrators left the protest, violent
agitators and counterprotesters emerged and descended upon them to harass and, in many cases, to commit violence. [Seven
video clips] Police arrested 21 people in connection to the violence, according to NBC Washington. NBC Washington
described some of the various charges of the suspects in this maelstrom, which included disorderly conduct and assault.
Though many local outlets covered these incidents extensively, the story gathered little attention from national media.
One would think that widespread violent attacks on peaceful protesters expressing their First Amendment rights would elicit a
strong response from journalists. But coverage was both lukewarm and deceptive, portraying the incident as if it was
Trump supporters who were the originators of the violent behavior.
The
press conference the media mocked, derided, and refused to cover. I watched the news conference Thursday
conducted by President Trump's campaign attorneys, and later visited the websites of the major networks to see what their
interpretation of the bombshell would be. CNN said they wouldn't even air the news conference because it was 'so
bananas' and 'full of BS.' Yes, really. MSNBC linked to a Chuck Todd commentary saying: "This has been a
bonkers press conference." ABC linked to this headline: "Promising more lawsuits, Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani
recycles debunked claims." CBS News, at 9:32 p.m., had no mention of the news conference at all. NBC News put
out: "Rudy Giuliani baselessly alleges 'centralized' voter fraud at free-wheeling news conference." Fox News's
Kristin Fisher blatantly called Giuliani a liar.
'We no longer have' an 'honest press'.
Imagine if Joe Biden had enjoyed a healthy lead on election night only to see it evaporate as the numbers dripped in from
Republican strongholds. Does anyone believe the mainstream media would have rushed to anoint Donald Trump the
winner? Would the New York Times, Washington Post, NPR and other outlets have cast the inevitable Democrat demands for
ballot reviews and recounts as a constitutional crisis or would they have run wall-to-wall coverage about the inherent
problems associated with mail-in ballots?
Red Flags
in Wisconsin and Minnesota. The mainstream media continues to pitch the idea that the November 3 presidential
election was free and fair. Yet the numbers just don't add up. Looking closely at outcomes in states like Minnesota
and Wisconsin, certain "red flag" patterns emerge. First, both states experienced an anomalous 89% voter turnout, a number
between 14 and 22 points higher than the turnout in the 2016 General Election. Secondly, both states had a
surprisingly high number of ballots that were not completely filled out with a large portion of incomplete ballots either cast
for Biden but not for a U.S. House Democrat (95% in Minnesota; 57% in Wisconsin) or a disproportionately high number of incomplete
ballots cast for a US House Republican but not for Trump (43% in Wisconsin).
Contesting
Election Results in Court Isn't the End of Democracy. Quite the Opposite. Is a disputed presidential
election the end of democracy as we know it? That's what many pundits and members of the legacy media are claiming as
President Donald Trump has challenged election results in a number of states — both legally and
rhetorically. It seems that much of the media hivemind now insists that voter fraud never happens, that it's equally
impossible for an election to be stolen or tainted in any way, and that going a few weeks with two rival candidates both
declaring victory (including one they really don't like) means we are witnessing the end of America as a free country.
It's amazing that this is the case after countless Democrats, including Hillary Clinton, insisted that Trump colluded with
Russians to steal the 2016 election, a story that most major media outlets ran with for years without providing any hard evidence.
Mainstream
Media United in Forcing 'President-Elect' Biden Down Your Throat. Some skepticism is called for when the
mainstream media are so uniformly in agreement about anything, let alone about a hotly disputed presidential election.
"President-elect" is the legal term for the person with 270 or more votes cast in the Electoral College, which doesn't even
meet this year to cast those votes until Dec. 14, a month in the future. Then, and only then, will we have a
"president-elect." And maybe not even then if the investigations of corruption in several states haven't concluded and hold
up certifying state election results. So, at least until then, the correct term for Joe Biden is not "president-elect,"
despite the mainstream media gratuitously hanging that title on him.
Disgraced
Fox News Retracts False House Race Projection — 8 Days Later! Obviously, the biggest Election Day
loser will either be President Trump or Joe Biden, depending on who ultimately wins the presidential election, and the second
biggest loser will be congressional Democrats, who lost seats in the House and failed to retake the Senate majority, but
another major loser — without any question — is disgraced Fox News. The bottom is falling out of
Fox's reputation, and there are reports that the once-respected outlet is suffering in the ratings. None of this should
surprise anyone, especially with the countless botched calls and outright lies still being uncovered during the dumpster fire
that was Fox's Election Night coverage.
Time
to cut the cord on media's Trump bashing. [Scroll down] Here's a few other things that are bugging
me: A pablum-puking MSNBC "historian" who swoons over how great Joe Biden's speeches are, and then it turns out he's
been writing them. [...] Any Democrat who doesn't put air quotes around "glitches" anytime he or she mentions one fraud or
another. Any alleged pundit who says President-Select (as opposed to Elect) Joe Biden faces the greatest challenges of
any president since the Civil War. (Too many to list.) Anyone who compares Dementia Joe to FDR. [...] Anyone on TV who
spent the last four years screaming "Russia! Russia! Russia!" who is now saying that anyone who has doubts about
the election is not "patriotic." Anyone who says that all reports of ballot fraud have been "debunked." Anyone who
says that the "adults" are now going to be in charge. Anyone who mentions the potential of a "coup," without acknowledging
what the four-year-long Russia-Russia-Russia hoax was.
Every MSM Outlet: Postal Voting Fraud Whistleblower
Recants! Whistleblower: No I Didn't! We've reached the point in the post-election cycle where the
mainstream media is so desperate to make Democrats' election fraud for Joe Biden stick that they're not just ignore election
fraud stories, they're outright lying about them. Take for example the recent news story of a U.S. postal worker
whistleblower Richard Hopkins recanting his accusations of being instructed to backdate ballots. Just one tiny little
flaw in the story: he did no such thing.
Extortion
Day. In the days preceding last week's election, the downtown corridors of many American cities resembled
coastal hurricane zones. Business owners boarded up their stores, fearing that the election might unleash another wave
of destructive rioting. In Washington, D.C., luxury shops and office complexes constructed fortifications with boards,
chains, fences, and barriers. In the neighborhood surrounding the White House, the Secret Service, laborers, and
left-wing protesters all prepared for Election Night. Then something miraculous happened. The following morning,
as the election returns began to favor former vice president Joe Biden, the fences, boards, and chains came down. Small
business owners reopened their shops, and the anticipation of violence evaporated. The national media, which had been
stoking fears about Proud Boys and white supremacists flooding the cities with political violence, simply dropped the
story — as if it had never been a story.
Don't Give
an Inch. For five years, the Democratic party and their allies in the corporate media, the coddled government
bureaucracies, and the Big Tech platforms have fought Trump with every weapon at their disposal. They uncritically and
feverishly repeated every deranged theory that Trump was really a Russian asset operating as Putin's Manchurian candidate,
and then cheered on his impeachment for it. An FBI lawyer altered evidence to spy on a U.S. citizen while texting "viva
la resistance" to his colleagues. When, less than a month before the election, Facebook and Twitter outright banned the
circulation of a New York Post story involving corruption in the Biden family, media outlets happily did the
same. The New York Times accused Trump of faking his post-COVID White House appearance with a green screen and
using secret Twitter code to activate right-wing extremists. CNN is now settling libel suits for its role in
instigating a vicious social media campaign and physical threats against a Catholic high school kid — all for the
crime of wearing a MAGA hat. Media outlets that breathlessly ran with a fake story about Trump killing an entire pond
of koi fish refused to cover the violent riots that broke out across the country this summer. They stood in front of
buildings that were literally on fire, claiming the protests were "fiery, but mostly peaceful." They told us that border
walls don't stop illegal immigration, riots don't spread COVID-19 (but schools and church services do), and Joe Biden would
win in a landslide.
New
York Times' Kevin Roose Calls Accurate Stories About Election Integrity Fight 'Misinformation'. In a sign of
things to come from the blacklisters in the corporate media, New York Times' tech writer Kevin Roose attacked Facebook
for allowing stories that are 100 percent accurate to rise to "the 10 most-engaged URLs on the platform over the last
24 hours." "Facebook is absolutely teeming with right-wing misinformation right now. These are all among the 10
most-engaged URLs on the platform over the last 24 hours," the far-left propagandist tweeted from his verified account on Monday
[11/9/2020]. [...] All four of those stories are news stories. All four of those stores are reporting on events that
actually happened. All four of those stories are informing readers of what is going on. A Republican in Michigan
did win an election after a glitch was found. That's a fact. That happened. Attorney General Barr did authorize
his staff to look at voting irregularities. That's a fact. That happened. The Michigan legislature did hold an
emergency session about election irregularities. That's a fact. That happened. Both of Georgia's Republican
U.S. Senate candidates — Loeffler and Perdue — did call on Georgia's secretary of state to resign.
That's a fact. That happened.
Voter
Fraud Plus Bait-and-Switch Equals Tyranny. [Scroll down] Biden was simply the front man, and he knew
pollsters would rig the numbers to show him with a massive lead. The establishment media confirmed they had learned
nothing. Fox News polls were among the worst and on election night, as Kimball noted, Fox refused to call Florida for
Trump even after he had won the state. They called Arizona for Biden when it still in play, with lines at the
polls. Two days after the election, Fox refused to call Alaska and other states for Trump, even though the president's
win was clear.
The
Darkness Where Democracy Dies. [Scroll down] President Trump brokered real peace between Israel and an
ever-expanding list of long-hostile Arab nations that so far includes UAE, Sudan, and Bahrain. The press ignored it or
disparaged it, so the people are in the dark about it. American cities have been devastated by riots that the media
called "mostly peaceful protests." Millions of Americans don't know the extent of what happened or were poisoned with
regard to interpretation of those tragic events. For three years, the Deep State and the media propagated a complete
fabrication known as Trump/Russia Collusion. No evidence was found for it. It never happened. Yet they
still report that it did. Today, nearly half the country believes it happened. That is known as propaganda, which
is very dark. Tony Bobulinski came forward with hard, credible evidence of Joe Biden's egregious corruption of American
foreign policy for the purposes of enriching his family with laundered millions from China, Ukraine, and others. Social
media censored the story. Incredibly, the entire MSM dismissed it as Russian disinformation. The result is this:
a compromised man with regard to national security has been crowned president by the same media that kept the people in the dark.
Corrupt
Media Desperate to Close the Books on Contested Election. Joe Biden is not "president-elect." Joe Biden
has not won the 2020 presidential election. Donald Trump's re-election has not been defeated. Right now, Joe
Biden is merely "ahead in the count" of enough states to win the presidency. But this is a contested election and we
have a long way to go, probably more than a month and a plethora of legal filings, before a winner is declared. Per our
own Constitution, there is only one institution legally entitled to declare a winner in a presidential election, and that's
the Electoral College, which does not meet until the middle of December. Only the Electoral College can dub someone
"president-elect." The fake news media, of course — the corporate media, the same corrupt media that told us
to be patient if Election Day lasted weeks, now want us to forget all that, want to close the book on the election before it
has been audited, want us to believe unelected liars who sit in anchor chairs have the legal authority to declare Joe Biden
"president elect."
'Since
when did the Lamestream Media decide who the President is?' Trump doubles down on refusing to concede.
President Donald Trump pushed out more unsubstantiated claims that the election was stolen by firing off a series of angry
tweets Sunday, even as the vote count continued to move against him and Joe Biden shifted into transition mode. The
tweet from Trump came more than an hour after George W. Bush issued a message telling him the election's outcome was 'clear'
and that it was held with 'fairness and integrity' and Chris Christie, one of the president's most prominent allies, said it
was time for him to show evidence or 'move on.' With his political options narrowing and his hold on power becoming
more tenuous by the hour, Trump also blasted the media for getting to 'call' who will be the next president.
Why
Hasn't Fox News Retracted Its Wrong Call on the House? Despite what Fox News might think, this
election — as it drags ever closer to unreality — is not decided by Fox News. On Election Night,
Fox News Channel's decision desk "called the House," saying Democrats would gain five seats. This happened while
Californians were still voting. Why does that matter? Because there are four districts in California that
Democrats won from Republicans in 2018 and which Republicans were trying to retake. They are likely to win at least
three of them. In all, a source close to House Republican leadership says the GOP is likely to go into the next
Congress with between 210 and 214 seats. That means they gained 11-14 seats and substantially trimmed House Speaker
Nancy Pelosi's majority. Fox News could not have been more wrong, but they still have not retracted their very wrong,
very badly timed call.
Saturday's
Media Declaration Is A Naked Attempt To Silence Republicans, And Nothing Has Changed. Nothing has changed since
Friday night. You might find that strange, given the media stampede to certify the election results for their man, but
it's crucial. The calls made Saturday morning are as arbitrary as they were last Tuesday, could just as easily have
waited for Monday, and fly in the face of massive evidence of voter irregularities that, at minimum, should be heard in court
before anyone considers calling the election. Add pending lawsuits and official recounts in Pennsylvania, Georgia,
Arizona, Nevada, Michigan and Wisconsin, and the conclusion is an attempt by the American media to pick our president and
decide our election. The danger comes now, when in concert with Silicon Valley censors they use their own decree to
dismiss and silence anyone who says otherwise.
Media
Declares Joe Biden Winner of 2020 Election. The strategy of using of mail-in ballots to structurally steal the
2020 election predictably contained an inevitable series of events to support it. The media's preemptive declaration of
a Biden victory is one cascading domino in that very predictable sequence. The media effort is to build a wave
narrative strong and heavy enough to block any sunlight upon the fraud perpetrated by regional election officials. The
statistical improbability of the U.S. election outcome are glaring; there are hundreds of examples that just don't make
sense. Thus the need for the media narrative becomes more important. Perhaps the most unnerving aspect to this
election fraud is knowing that Joe Biden is merely a puppet for a group of political and deep state interests; the Milli
Vanilli candidate with a giggling high-school-minded VP.
Newsmax rises, Fox
falls. Fox won Election Night bigly. Their 14 million viewer [ratings] were yuge. Then the network
began showing its RINO side, and then its liberal side. WTMA reported, "Conservatives ditched Fox News for Newsmax TV's
election coverage in droves. On Election Night, celebrities, political pundits in the White House, and staunch Fox fans
tuned into Newsmax TV to get their election news, more proof of the meteoric rise in popularity of Newsmax TV. "Many
began flipping the channel after Fox News called Arizona for Democrat Joe Biden. According to Newsweek, Fox was the
only network at the time to show the state going to Biden. Newsmax was the first major news network to project Florida
for Trump." Fox went downhill when the Family Murdoch kicked Roger Ailes to the curb.
Time
for Fox News to climb out of the hole it's dug. Fox News was early in predicting that Arizona would go for
Biden, even though the people at the network knew that the most Republican county in the state was not yet counted.
When they saw Trump's lead in Georgia dwindle to nothing, they reported it as though it were the weather. When they
heard Trump's claims of voter fraud, they found "experts" to proclaim that Trump had no evidence. I credit Tucker
Carlson, Sean Hannity, and Laura Ingraham for daring to bring up the subject. Is there evidence of voter fraud? A
postal worker reports that his boss wanted him to backdate postmarks in Michigan. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court
legislated election procedure changes in the last few months. Some ballots were found literally hiding under a rock in
Arizona. In all, thousands of votes were illegally cast. This means that there are thousands of criminals on the
loose. This apparently does not count as evidence.
Cutting
the Cable News Cord. Having worked a significant portion of my life as a news reporter and editor, journalism
will always be in my blood. I crave news and information like some crave chocolate. That will likely never
change. What will change is where I get that news and information. While there are many reasons which factored
into my decision, the final proverbial straw came when Fox News continued to deny any "credible evidence" of election/voter
fraud. Such declarations were often delivered by anchors with a sneer and a smirk. With social media and big
tech-monopolies banning and censoring evidence of verifiable election fraud, even Fox News likely feels safe in perpetuating
the "nothing to see here" lie. The problem for these censoring overlords and truth-deniers is that election fraud is,
in fact, taking place. When dead people somehow rise from the grave to vote, that is election fraud. When people
who are not legally permitted by law to vote somehow manage to do so, there is election fraud. When states defy court
orders and violate the law by refusing to allow one party access to vote counting, that is election fraud. When
statistically impossible ballot percentages magically appear in the dead of night, election fraud is likely the cause.
When thumb-drives miraculously appear from thin air, election fraud possibilities should, at the very least, be
investigated. One need not be a legal scholar to comprehend what election/voter fraud is.
Media
Calls the Race For Joe Biden But Is it Really Over? The television networks have called the 2020 presidential
election, announcing Joe Biden as the winner in Pennsylvania — giving him, in theory, enough electoral college
votes to become the next president. But is it over? Election officials have yet to call the win, and the Trump
campaign has several legal challenges in play. Networks rushed to the airwaves to announce that Biden had taken the 20
electoral votes in PA less than 15 minutes before Trump's legal team was to hold a press conference in Philadelphia, PA.
Trump campaign attorneys represented by Rudy Giuliani spoke about irregularities in the voting and ballot-counting
process. Leftist media outlets immediately launched sensationalized headlines such as "You're Fired" but the president
vowed in a statement that the fight is not yet over.
The Democrats' Chickens Come Home to
Roost. The majority of Americans do not trust the mainstream left-wing media. Four years of hatchet jobs,
defamation, character assassinations, and such leave Independents, no less than conservatives, unable to believe ABC, CBS,
NBC, PBS, MSNBC, CNN, the Washington Post, and the New York Times. For those few who still cling to their
doubts but hopes about media credibility, the nonsensical polls sealed the deal. Only die-hards on the left now believe
Jake Tapper or Rachel Maddow or their ilk.
Media
gaslights GOP voters with false attributions to Republicans supposedly 'rebuking' Trump. Major media outlets
have begun to gaslight GOP voters in the wake of a contentious and still unsettled election using false or misleading claims
attributed to Republicans who are supposedly rebuking President Donald Trump. The UK's Daily Mail, for instance,
published a story under a lengthy headline that is blatantly false: "Mitch McConnell says EVERY vote must be counted in
a veiled rebuke to Trump — as GOP's Pennsylvania senator calls president's conspiracy-theory rant 'hard to watch'
and says there is NO large scale fraud." "Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell ignored President Donald Trump's wild
claims of widespread election fraud, sending out a sober tweet Friday morning," the lead paragraph claimed. But the
very next paragraph — which is a quote from McConnell himself — directly refutes what was just claimed.
Vote
Against the DC and Manhattan Media Elite. [Scroll down] From Election Day 2016, the mainstream media
originating from Manhattan and Washington, DC, have thrown off the shackles of objectivity and re-envisioned their role in
the American political conversation. From The New York Times to the Washington Post to all the network newsrooms to
MSNBC and the once-respected CNN, the fourth estate has revealed itself as a fifth column. They've stopped pretending
to report the facts. They've become the voice of the resistance, and they've aligned their resources, talents and
waning influence for one objective: To end the Trump presidency. First, they tried to undermine his inauguration
by publishing the phony "Steele dossier" days before his swearing-in. The narrative to the American people was to plant
the seed that our new president was a traitor and puppet of the Russian government. It was a complete lie. But
the damage was done. It led to the anonymous leaks that suggested Trump was trying to stop an investigation into his
campaign.
The
Mainstream Media's COVID Cover-up Continues. The mainstream media's double standard when it comes to accuracy
is undeniable to anyone with a shred of integrity. For stories that favor the Left or damage the Right, the bar
couldn't be lower. For stories that are vice-versa, however, the media's scrutiny has no end. We've seen the
phenomenon ad nauseam for years now, but its frequency and impact has reached a critical level. We saw it with
Christine Blasey Ford and her uncorroborated accusations against Justice Brett Kavanaugh that were willingly regurgitated by
Democrats and their media. We see it currently with the unfolding scandal involving Hunter Biden, as the media scoffs
at its legitimacy in spite of the validated authenticity of the emails that kick-started the whole hubbub. There is
arguably no story, however, where the media's duplicity is more evident and more detrimental than what we've seen regarding
their reporting on COVID-19.
Will
the Mainstream Media Disappear a Trump Election Victory? Entrepreneur and Dilbert-creator Scott Adams has put
forth an intriguing possibility about the election outcome. Even if President Donald Trump wins re-election, the
mainstream media may attempt to undo the election by reporting that he lost. The half of the country that lives inside
the media misinformation bubble may believe this, and it may instigate a period of instability and uncertainty. Before
Trump, anyone who said anything like what Adams has proposed as a possibility would be deemed a tinfoil-hat conspiracy
theorist, and with good reason. But during Trump's presidency, the mainstream media have disregarded the truth, to the
point where they openly tell lies that half the country immediately recognizes as disinformation.
The
real story behind the New York Times's big 'anonymous' op-ed is exceptionally sleazy. Indeed, based on what we
know now, everyone involved in this sad episode comes across as remarkably unethical, most especially the op-ed's author,
former Department of Homeland Security employee Miles Taylor. For starters, Taylor and the New York Times
grossly exaggerated his credentials as a "senior" member of the Trump administration. Taylor served as a "Deputy Chief
of Staff" at the time he submitted his op-ed to the paper. He did not hold the position of chief of staff until
later. Yet, the New York Times billed him anyway as a "senior official in the Trump administration," an
overblown descriptor that Taylor himself made no effort to correct.
Yes,
[the] Media Are Rigging [the] Election Against Half The Country. Here's How. This week saw the news that
the supposedly high-ranking "Anonymous" government official that published a 2018 New York Times op-ed about secretly
undermining a president he personally disagreed with was in fact a 30-year-old mid-level bureaucrat nobody had ever heard
of. The fake narrative that the New York Times knowingly promulgated roiled the administration for months, if not
years, as high-level cabinet officials took turns denying that they were secretly and unconstitutionally undermining the
elected president of the United States. Miles Taylor was the Homeland Security Department policy analyst who turned out
to have written the op-ed and a best-selling book about how he and other Resistance members put their personal political
preferences over the ones chosen by the voting populace when they elected Trump president. That little op-ed was
nothing compared to the preposterously false Russia collusion hoax that the media promulgated for years thanks to dubious and
selective leaks from politically motivated sources.
Facts
Matter: Trump's Real Record on Race. Whether it's Chris Wallace, or Savannah Guthrie, or Jim Acosta, some
other loudmouth reporter screaming the "denounce" demand as the President walks by, this demand, premised upon a lie, gets
repeated ad nauseam by dishonest journalists. Their purpose is to create a false impression that Trump has done
something, or said something in the past, that makes him a "racist." But nothing could be further from the truth.
The president's record shows something quite the opposite of the insinuations shouted by the Trump-hating members of the
liberal media. In fact, the president's record, over time, pictures a man with a huge heart and great compassion
and love for the African-American community in the United States.
Leslie
Stahl's Behavior in that Trump 60 Minutes Interview Got Even Dumber. 60 Minutes is really, really mad. As
Kira Davis and Nick Arama both covered yesterday, Trump preemptively released the interview to counter the selective editing
and narrative pushing Leslie Stahl, the interviewer, and company were looking do. Initially, anonymous claims were made
to major networks that Trump had "stormed out." The President's video shows that was false. Then you got idiocy
like this, where Stahl insists that the Hunter Biden emails shouldn't be reported on because they "can't be verified."
Ignoring the fact that the media report on all manner of unverified gossip when it's anti-Trump, Stahl's excuse is also
nonsensical, as the emails have been verified in multiple ways.
Media's
Uphill Battle to Create a Self-Fulfilling Election Prophecy. The media effort in 2020 is indeed very similar to
2016 in that current narratives are a psychological effort to create a self-fulfilling prophecy. Baseline 101:
Everyone naturally wants to be on the winning team. The media effort, and that means all media including social media
and big tech, is to push down Trump support and elevate the appearance of Biden support. I really wish people would
deeply consider this. [...] Everything you are witnessing right now is about psychological control to create the false
illusion of reality within your own mind. Essentially, professional media gaslighting with an agenda and purpose.
This is not a conspiracy theory, those who are coordinating the effort have admitted exactly what they are doing.
'Struggling'
bar owner in Biden ad is wealthy investor who supported lockdowns. A Michigan music venue owner featured in a
Joe Biden ad campaign lamenting his struggles to survive during coronavirus restrictions is actually a wealthy tech
investor — who supported local lockdowns, according to reports. Joe Malcoun was featured in the
heart-tugging Biden ad that aired during NFL games Sunday complaining about the chances of his Ann Arbor bar and music venue,
the Blind Pig, surviving the pandemic. [...] The ad suggested Malcoun's future and his family were at risk, but made no
mention of the bar owner's numerous other businesses as a wealthy "angel investor" in tech companies. Malcoun admitted
in a 2018 interview with Click On Detroit that he made his start thanks to a huge inheritance from his wife's grandfather, a
real estate investor, that he admitted was "almost like winning the lottery." It soon made him "the go-to guy when it
came to seeking investments," the local news outlet said, helping companies raise millions.
Biden's Big Media Malarkey
Machine. If you believe the media, Joe Biden is heading toward a landslide of such historic proportions that
even Texas may tip into the Democrat's column. Of course, no intelligent person actually believes this, but the
propaganda organs of our national media are so devoted to Team Joe that the possibility of turning Texas "blue" continues to
be the subject of allegedly serious reporting. A well-informed source in Texas tells me GOP internal polls show a
tighter-than-usual contest there, and Democrats are bombarding young Texans with get-out-the-vote text messages, but this is
a state Trump won with a comfortable margin of more than 800,000 votes in 2016. Nevertheless, the media are dreaming
the impossible dream.
5
Other Things We'll Learn About Biden After The Election. [#3] The economy has been doing much better than the
public had been led to believe. Back in 1996, when George H.W. Bush was running for reelection, the press treated
the economy as though it were in another depression, which just so happened to coincide with Bill Clinton's campaign
messaging. As soon as the election was over, coverage of the economy suddenly became more upbeat, and the public
learned that the very mild recession had ended way back in March 1991.
What
the MSM TV coverage doesn't show you at a Biden Potemkin rally. Mainstream media coverage of Joe Biden's
campaign rallies depicts a false façade, giving an impression of a normal political event. But the reality is as
phony as the façades of prosperous villages that Catherine The Great's political advisor (and lover) Grigori Potemkin
erected for her to view from her imperial barge, masking the misery of her subjects. Potemkin today is remembered
chiefly for the expression "Potemkin village," defined as "an impressive facade or show designed to hide an undesirable fact
or condition." (Check the link quickly before Merriam-Webster changes the definition to conform with the political
interests of the Democrats.) A hilarious Twitter video has survived the "fact checkers" at the social media giant (for
now), panning from away the podium to show the handful of people — apparenlty, mostly media — standing
around and sorta watching Biden's bizarrely impassioned speech to a parking lot in Novi, Michigan (a Detroit suburb) last
Friday, [...]
Steve
Scully suspended indefinitely by C-SPAN for lying about his Twitter account being hacked. The man who was to
have moderated a town hall-style debate tonight between President Trump and ex-VP Biden has been suspended from his job as
C-SPAN's political editor after admitting to lying about his Twitter account being hacked. [...] Scully had asked Trump-hater
Scaramucci for advice on dealing with Trump's criticism of him as a NeverTrumper. By lying and claiming that his
account was hacked (the third time he made such a claim) Scully opened Pandora's Box, with his employer, the Commission of
Presidential Debates, and the FBI announcing investigations. He likely concluded that his lie was going to be exposed
and may have feared legal consequences if an FBI investigation came to that conclusion.
C-SPAN's
Steve Scully suspended after admitting to lying about Twitter hack. C-SPAN suspended political editor Steve Scully
indefinitely on Thursday [10/15/2020] after he confessed to lying about his Twitter account being hacked following an exchange with
former White House aide-turned President Trump critic Anthony Scaramucci. Scully was slated to moderate the second presidential
debate between Trump and Democratic nominee Joe Biden scheduled for Thursday night. The Commission on Presidential Debates
canceled the event Friday after the president declined to do the debate virtually after testing positive for COVID-19.
C-SPAN announced last week it was conducting an investigation into the alleged hack.
AP
Forced to Issue Correction For Using Democrat Language on Court-Packing. Last week, the AP Stylebook was
amended to discourage the use of the word "riot" to describe violent protests. Because, you know, they were "mostly
peaceful protests." Or something. And now, this: Although at least this time, they were forced to retract
their biased shenanigans.
Associated
Press goes full Orwell, calling 'packing' of SCOTUS 'court reform'. It is obvious from Joe Biden telling voters
that they don't deserve to know if he plans to pack the Supreme Court that he and his handlers are terrified of a negative
voter reaction to the plan. Biden's remarkably stupid comment came in response to a reporter's question at an interview
where no teleprompter guidance was feasible. [...]
Not
Making Headlines: Alleged "Right-wing" Militia Member Arrested for Plot Against Gov. Whitmer Was Black Lives
Matter Protester and Sympathizer. On Thursday [10/8/2020] the FBI announced during a press conference that it
thwarted a plot by a so-called "right-wing militia" to kidnap and kill Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer and overthrow the
state government. Early Thursday morning, federal agencies raided a house in Hartland, Michigan and arrested six
men: Adam Fox, Barry Croft, Ty Garbin, Kaleb Franks, Daniel Harris, and Brandon Caserta. Whitmer immediately
blamed the plot on President Trump telling the Proud Boys to "stand back and stand by." "Hate groups heard the
president's words as a rallying cry, as a call to action," Whitmer said blaming white supremacists. It turns out
Brandon Caserta, one of anarchists who was arrested for plotting to kidnap Whitmer, actually hates President Trump and is on
video calling Trump a "tyrant."
Turns
Out the Folks Behind the Whitmer Plot Aren't Who Dems and Media Are Painting Them As. The FBI did a good job
taking down the group and it sounded like a serious danger to Whitmer if they did what they are alleged to have done, so it's
good they got them. But when Whitmer sounded off about the plot, she immediately tried to falsely link the president
and the Proud Boys to the event, neither of which had anything to do with it. According to Whitmer, Trump had sent a
"rallying cry" to "action." Of course there were several problems with her assertions. The Proud Boys are a
different group, Trump has nothing to do with them and they aren't "white supremacists." Further, turns out in checking
out the folks behind the alleged plot, one of the alleged members, Brandon Caserta, would appear to be an anarchist.
Not only that, he's anti-Trump.
Gregg
Jarrett lambastes the media as 'willing accessories to the Russia hoax'. Fox News legal analyst Greg Jarrett
believes that there will be troves of proof demonstrating government officials' egregious misconduct during the Russia
collusion probe once all of the materials get declassified. Jarrett told the "John Solomon Reports" podcast [...] that
he thinks "when all of it is declassified there will be a mountain of damning, incriminating evidence about just how devious
and corrupt these government officials were in the Russia hoax."
NBC
Caught Again Manipulating Joe Biden Town Hall With Planted Audience and Advance Script. The Washington Free
Beacon has done a great job exposing the intentional and manipulative intents of NBC and Lester Holt during a recent
town-hall event with presidential candidate Joe Biden. At this point American media have become Pravda in their efforts
to manipulate the outcome of the 2020 election.
Defending
Trump from a Tornado of Liberal Lies. The media's whitewashing of the riots is mind-boggling. The words
we use are important in accurately conveying a message; using words to sugarcoat reality is wrong. The left is using
the phrase "peaceful protests" to describe burning down cities and bludgeoning business-owners who guard their stores from
the looters. Commentators are earnestly lamenting the deprivations of poverty that supposedly are driving the poor to
steal in order to be able to eat; actually, the visuals show footage of those stealing luxury items — everything
from elite athletes' signature sneakers to big screen TVs — and partiers who are just grabbing
whatever — frequently alcohol — for the bragging rights. Then there are the serious analysts who
are using the riots as a pretext to attack Trump. And for what? Blaming him for the failures of Democrat mayors
and governors to maintain order because... Trump's hate-filled racist rhetoric caused the riots. The rioters are
obviously left-wingers, out-of-work students intoxicated by Marxist rhetoric and bored inner-city kids being manipulated in
anarchy by Antifa. All the talk about "white supremacy" groups is a smokescreen and an insult to the viewers who can
see what is actually happening despite all of the gaslighting about "mostly peaceful protests."
Don't
Believe Anything 'Sources' Say. As every sentient person knows by now, our mainstream media and Big Tech
platforms are limitlessly corrupt. Almost nothing they say, report or interpret can be trusted. They have become
mouthpieces for the political Left, resonating bullhorns for the Democratic Party, the "social justice" insurgency, the
feminist movement, domestic terrorists like Antifa and BLM, and the concerted effort to vilify and destroy the sitting
American president. A dead giveaway of their malignant agenda is the customary reliance on the "expert," the "insider,"
a someone-in-the-know code-named as "a source" or, more explicitly, "an unnamed source." The phenomenon is so ubiquitous that
it scarcely needs even a jot of documentation. Just pick up The New York Times or The Washington Post et
al., scan any number of Internet sites, or watch CNN, MSNBC and the rest of that morbid crew, and you will meet the
unnamed source at every turn.
America's Chris Wallace Problem.
[Chris] Wallace's dismal performance as moderator in Tuesday's [9/29/2020] presidential debate reminded many viewers of such
previous instances in which the Fox News Sunday host has shown his prejudice against Trump. And this matters, not only
because of how that ugly televised carnival might affect the election, but because of what it tells us about the sad state of
journalism in America. [...] Consider this question he aimed at President Trump: "You have repeatedly criticized the
vice president for not specifically calling out Antifa and other left-wing extremist groups, but are you willing tonight to
condemn white supremacists and militia groups and to say that they need to stand down and not add to the violence in a number
of these cities, as we saw in Kenosha and as we've seen in Portland?" Where is the evidence that "white supremacists and
militia groups" were to blame for violence in Kenosha or Portland, Oregon? Wallace's question was not only tendentious,
but counterfactual.
Dear
Chris Wallace: We Were In Kenosha, And No, White Supremacists And Militias Didn't Cause Violence.
Ignoring for a moment that Trump's criticism of Joe Biden was absolutely warranted and that Wallace asked Trump to condemn
white supremacists but did not ask Biden to condemn Black Lives Matter arsonists and looters, the question itself was
specious. The violence in Kenosha was spurred by left-wing extremist groups, not white supremacists. We
know — because we were there. Kenosha was up in flames, reduced to the same lawlessness that swept
Minneapolis, Portland, Atlanta, and now this small Midwest town. Monday night in Kenosha, a day after law enforcement
shot Jacob Blake, men and women stood with baseball bats and guns in front of their businesses and homes, trying to defend
themselves against the extremist violence of the Black Lives Matter left. Since there weren't enough police to control the
situation, officers focused on defending public buildings, such as the courthouse, while leaving citizens to fend for themselves.
Chris
Wallace Falsely Implies Trump Never Condemned White Supremacists. CLAIM: Debate moderator Chris Wallace implied
that President Donald Trump never condemned white supremacists. VERDICT: FALSE. President Trump has done so
repeatedly, despite what Wallace — and Joe Biden — have suggested. During the first presidential debate,
Wallace challenged President Trump to condemn white supremacists. It was an astonishingly ill-informed — and
inflammatory — challenge, and repeated a lie that Biden has told frequently in the campaign. Trump has
condemned white supremacists repeatedly.
NYT
Admits Trump Actually Paid Nearly $6 Million in Taxes in 2016 and 2017. Trump PAID, as in transferred to the US
Treasury, $1 million in 2016 and $4.2 million in 2017. Note also that most of the overpayment was rolled forward, not
refunded. The $750 figure is an ADDITIONAL $750. Thus every single story saying he paid $750 is a lie.
NBC
Warns 'Committed Conservative' Barrett 'Instantly Controversial'. On Saturday evening [9/26/2020], shortly
after President Trump nominated Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court, NBC Nightly News let the ideological
labels fly as the nominee was repeatedly identified as a "conservative" who was popular with the "religious right" and
"instantly controversial." By contrast, the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was never given any left-wing political label in
the report. [...] In the report that followed, correspondent Hallie Jackson emphasized: "From President Trump, a move
to cement a more conservative Supreme Court for a generation."
The Editor says...
Where is the verb in that last sentence? That's not English, it's Headline-ese.
Jill
campaigns for husband Joe before an itty bitty crowd. Sleepy Joe has taken a lot of days off this month.
The AP disingenuously calls it a "low-key campaign style" but admits it concerns some Democrats. Biden made 12 visits
outside of Delaware since August 12 and President Trump made 24 visits to 17 states. The NY Times
dishonestly claims that Slow Joe's inability to put sentences together is a "stutter." Neither Joe nor Kamala Harris
are answering many reporters' questions and when they do, the questions are softball.
Trump
haters [are] gaslighting Trump supporters. Everywhere you turn, Trump haters are venting their wrath against Trump
supporters, as if supporting President Trump is an unforgivable sin. They're projecting and gaslighting — blaming
Trump and his supporters for everything they're doing. It's madness, but at long last, they might have awakened the sleeping
giant they're trying to hunt down and destroy. MSNBC's Joy Reid tweeted, "Genuine question: what will be the relationship
between the majority of Americans, and Trumpists after this long, national nightmare ends — and it will eventually
end — do people anticipate simply letting bygones (be) bygones with people who joined the Trump personality cult?"
What bygones? Who's doing what to whom? What are we Trump supporters doing to you Trump haters, Joy? We are
trying to mind our own business and stay safe.
Revolution 2020. [Scroll
down] Suffice it to note that not a day in four years has gone by without the news media hyperventilating or ruminating
on some allegation of Trump's wrongdoing or wrongbeing. For what? Again, the list of subjects is so exhaustive
that it is easier to note that there is hardly any mortal transgression of which he has not been accused. [...] Nor has the
media forgone any occasion to protect, foster, and embellish narratives in support of each and every member of the
"intersectional" coalition and to shut out or denigrate alternatives thereto. It labels as false and/or as "hate
speech" facts and arguments that counteract its narratives. Since the ruling class can be certain of the media's
unquestioning support, it need not worry about truth. For example, do physicians in America and around the world use
hydroxychloroquine successfully against the COVID-19 virus? Yes, correct — but banished as if it were false
because it is politically incorrect. Riots, arson, and looting are leading so many to relocate from America's major
cities as to cause urban vacancies and a house-building boom in the country? Fact. But politically incorrect
fact, indeed, racist. Repeat: "mostly peaceful protests, mostly peaceful protests."
Harris —
not Biden — is the real candidate. It has been obvious for some time that Biden's cognitive state is
on a level with the spider monkey. He can't remember where he is or what he is running for. He can't put together
a coherent sentence. His condition has become a running joke. At his age, he would at best be a one-term
president. So why would a major party pin its hopes on such a man? [...] Enter Kamala Harris. The media are
pushing the argument that Harris is on the ticket because of pressure to choose a woman of color as Biden's running
mate. Note this report from NBC News: "Add in Biden's age (77), and Harris could find herself in a unique
position as vice president. Instead of having to wait eight years for her shot, she could get it in the next election
in 2024." This is what the Democrats want us to believe. As usual, it is a lie. If they win, she won't have
to wait at all.
To
Rescue Biden, Media Conflate All Teleprompter Use. At his Wisconsin rally last night, President Donald Trump
continued to tease former Vice President Joe Biden for relying on a teleprompter when he answers queries from the
media. While teleprompter use is very common for politicians and others giving formal speeches, Biden is the first
candidate to regularly use one outside of formal speeches, such as during press conferences. During Biden's nearly 50
years in politics, his off-the-cuff remarks have gotten him in more than a bit of trouble, but the obvious teleprompter use
is posing problems of its own.
Mostly Peaceful: The Birth of an Excuse. In
late August, when riots erupted in Kenosha, Wisconsin, CNN featured a reporter standing in front of a burning car lot above a
chyron that read: "Fiery but mostly peaceful protests after police shooting." The use of the chyron was striking
in its peculiar earnestness, considering that the words "mostly peaceful protest" had long since become a bitter in-joke for
right-leaning social media. Indeed, from the moment the first protests began in late May, mainstream media outlets have
downplayed or ignored instances of violence or destructive looting. On May 29, MSNBC's Ali Velshi was reporting
from Minneapolis in the aftermath of the killing of George Floyd when he insisted he was seeing "mostly a protest" that
"is not, generally speaking, unruly" despite the fact that he was literally standing in front of a burning building at
the time. Yet Velshi was hesitant to ascribe blame to the arsonists and looters.
Antifa
and BLM, the Democrat party's stormtroopers. Not surprisingly, taxpayer-funded NPR has supported the not
"peaceful protests" for months. They have been touting that ludicrous book that defends looting and the destruction of
private property. They regularly use Trump's words out of context. NPR lost its way long before Trump was
elected, but it has been enthusiastically dragged into the anti-Trump fray. Why taxpayers are forced to subsidize this
particular branch of the Democrat party is not a mystery; taxpayers are stooges. Throughout these past months of
violent looting, arson, death, and destruction, NPR, like the rest of the leftist media, has misled their viewers and
insisted these riots were "mostly peaceful." They absolutely were not. They have caused hundreds of millions of
dollars in damage, mostly to small businesses, many of them minority-owned.
The
Trump Scandal Absorption Level Has Been Reached. [Scroll down] We're being lied to on a daily
basis. We're being manipulated by a minority that, without the media, would be invisible. This minority is
literally so small that if the media were not sponsoring them, we wouldn't see them. Now, as you know, psychologically,
this sufficient works. A lot of people on our side think that we are outnumbered — and the truth is, not
only are we not outnumbered, they're not even close to outnumbering us. Despite how you feel, despite how it might
look. And I'm talking specifically about the Marxist radical leftist. Not the usual liberal Democrats that we
know are out there. I'm talking about the Antifas and the Black Lives Matters. They are nowhere near a majority
of in this country. They are a tiny minority, and we're being told by CNN and the New York Times every day that the
country has now made the move to Marxism.
AG
Barr Rips National Media as a 'Collection of Liars' Over Riot Coverage. Wrapping up a three-day tour in
Chicago, Phoenix and Cleveland Friday, Attorney General Bill Barr took on the media during an exclusive interview with
Townhall. "They're basically a collection of liars. Most of the mainstream media. They're a collection of
liars and they know exactly what they're doing. A perfect example of that were the riots. Right on the street it
was clear as day what was going on, anyone observing it, reporters observing it, it could not have escaped their attention
that this was orchestrated violence by a hardened group of street fighting radicals and they kept on excluding from their
coverage all the video of this and reporting otherwise and they were doing that for partisan reasons, and they were lying to
the American people. It wasn't until they were caught red-handed after essentially weeks of this lie that they even
started feeling less timid," Barr said on the flight back to Washington Friday afternoon.
Riots? What Riots?
In my three decades as a media critic, this summer's huge effort by the press to cover up the endless rioting by George
Floyd's mourners has been its most shameless and shameful episode yet. Until very recently, a remarkable number of
naive Americans had fallen for the mainstream media's repetitions that the Peaceful Protesters were not — repeat,
not — looting and burning. The MSM has been in such flat-out denial mode that it hasn't even bothered
to concoct exculpatory euphemisms for the riots, such as Retail Mourning, Do-It-Yourself Reparations, or Arson for
Equity. Even last week a new report from a leftist think tank, the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project,
admitting to the immense number of violent demonstrations during this Summer of George was spun by the media as proving that
all those boarded-up shops near you don't exist.
WHEC Reporter Chased
By Knife-Wielding BLM Mob — Station Ignores Attack And Describes 'Protests' As 'Peaceful'. WHEC
reporter Charles Molineaux was attacked and chased by a knife-wielding Black Lives Matter mob during "protests" on Sunday
night in Rochester and yet his own news station ignored the incident and described the night's "protests" as "peaceful" on
their front page. Video shows Molineaux and his security guard getting attacked and called "Nazis" after apparently
getting accused of being undercover cops. An African-American man with a knife is seen running at them and threatening
to stab them repeatedly, only backing down when Molineaux's security guard turns around to defend him with an expandable
baton. UPDATE: The video was just deleted!
The
Media Are Lying About The Election Again. Election 2020 is shaping up to be déjà vu all over
again for the news media. In an effort to help push Joe Biden over the finish line, the Washington establishment is
going all-in on the easily refuted idea that there has been no change in the presidential race over the last three weeks.
[...] After having botched the entire news coverage of the 2016 election, where all the "experts" repeatedly told the
American public that Donald Trump had little to no chance of being the Republican nominee and even less a chance of being
elected president, corporate media are back at it again, insisting all is well with the Biden campaign and the Democrats are
safely on cruise control to take the White House and the Senate. Here's the truth they are not telling you. Biden
has little enthusiasm for his candidacy. He is taking on an incumbent president with significant first-term
accomplishments who has extremely energized supporters, to put it mildly.
Desperately Derailing
Donald. One always expects the media surprise leak of a purported hidden scandal as a presidential campaign
winds down. Remember the last-minute "discovery" of George W. Bush's undisclosed 24-year-old DUI arrest in 2000?
Or the October 7, 2016 effort of the Washington Post to publish the hoarded 11-year-old "Access Hollywood" tape, just two days
before Donald Trump's second debate with Hillary Clinton? We should expect lots of these "bombshells" and "walls are closing
in" pseudo derailments. Except Trump has been the most widely investigated, probed, attacked, and smeared president in
history. And so the scandal-field has pretty well been picked over, as those fired like Omarosa Manigault Newman, Anthony
Scaramucci, John Bolton, and others have long ago more or less lectured us that Trump is nuts, crazy, dangerous, stupid,
ignorant, and so forth.
New
York Times' sleazy narrative on Trump is nothing but a joke: Goodwin. A former colleague at The New York
Times once explained why he kept reading the paper even though he no longer trusted it: "I want to see what they're up
to." What they're up to now is staggering. Not content with four years of biased coverage of President Trump, the
Times is plunging head first into new depths of partisanship and deceit. [...] We are long removed from any possible claim
that Baquet's Times is fair and impartial. He has single-handedly abolished more than a century of standards in pursuit
of his white whale: defeating Donald Trump. Baquet launched his quest in 2016 but his slant then seems almost
restrained compared to his scheming now. This time, the top editor has institutionalized a ruthless commitment to
partisanship that I believe will someday be seen as rivaling the Times' historic scandals. In the 1930s, the paper
cozied up to Josef Stalin and ignored the famine in Ukraine, then downplayed the Holocaust and later supported the rise of
Fidel Castro while hiding his commitment to communism. Using distortions and duplicity to influence a presidential
election deserves to be included in that roster of infamy.
Fox News
Decides to Go Full CNN. Over the last several days, a report from The Atlantic has been making the
rounds. In it are accusations that the President doesn't like John McCain (shocker), but more importantly, that he
didn't want to visit a cemetery in France because he thinks dead soldiers are "losers." As I laid out in my original
debunking of this story, we already have documentary evidence from multiple sources, including some who hate Trump, that the
reason for not going to the cemetery was purely about the weather. No one has gone on record saying Trump said any
of the things alleged, though some have gone on record to say it didn't happen. Gen. Kelly, who is named as having
heard the comments, has remained quiet despite having no reason to do so. All of this points to the story being
nonsense, or at the very least, extremely misleading (i.e. perhaps some ancillary part is true, like bagging on McCain).
Unfortunately, Fox News has decided to lower its journalistic standards to those of CNN and help push this garbage.
Here
Are 31 Times The Media Pushed Narratives Downplaying Riots And Looting After George Floyd's Death. Dozens of
news outlets published content that either justified or explained away rioting and looting in the initial weeks of unrest
following the police custody death of George Floyd in late May, a Daily Caller News Foundation review found. While
President Donald Trump and Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden have both condemned rioting and looting, major news
outlets such as CNN and MSNBC have appeared to downplay the unrest that has gripped American cities in the months following
Floyd's death, in one instance describing a scene as "mostly peaceful" as fires raged in the background. But as the
violence broke out in American cities in late May and June, dozens of news outlets provided a platform for commentators,
professors and activists who not only acknowledged that rioting and looting were taking place, but sought to either justify
the violence as a valid protesting technique or as a form of righteous rebellion against an unjust system.
Participant
at Biden Event in Kenosha Admits She Was Given a "Paper" Telling Her What to Say. We know that the Biden
events are all staged and we now have more evidence. Today in Kenosha, Wisconsin at a Biden event a woman admitted on
camera that she was given a piece of paper telling her what to say: [...] The Biden team has managed their events by ensuring
all comments and questions the former Obama VP is asked are pre-approved, and set up so that Biden can read the respective
answers on the teleprompter. Yesterday we saw this as well and every day for that matter. The media and the Biden
team work together as they manufacture events and try to make them look unscripted.
Gaslighting
America: Democrats And Media Have Turned It Up To 11. The Democratic Party and its communications office
have been telling the country for some time now that night is day and up is down. But, with the election two months
away, the psychological manipulation of the American voter has accelerated. As we've written the past two days, Joe
Biden has condemned the riots that have been wrecking cities and killing people since the May 25 death of George Floyd.
We're glad he finally got around to it. Yet he and his party are acting as if they've opposed the violence all along
and it's President Donald Trump who has failed to come out against it. But Trump, of course, has been denouncing the
riots since they began. Even when the media were determined to convince us they were "mostly peaceful."
Evidence
Shows the Media Doesn't Really Care About Evidence. Read an article from any mainstream media outlet regarding
an even remotely controversial subject broached by President Trump, and it is likely to include the statement, "President
Trump claimed, without evidence..." Use of the phrase is so frequent, it is likely that writers at the New York
Times and elsewhere have it pop up in the auto-fill functionality on their laptops. Type in "President Trump,"
and the words "claimed without evidence" automatically appear to the side in opaque font, and all they have to do is hit
their arrow key to auto-fill the phrase. The practice has become so prevalent in the media's wonderland that they no
longer wait to include the phrase in the body of an article, they now put it right in their headlines.
As
Biden falls in the polls, the media's lies get bigger. The more desperate the media becomes to elect the
corrupt, incompetent Joe Biden, the bigger and more numerous the lies. We have been treated to Democrat campaign
workers, posing as journalists, and other Democrats throwing [stuff] against the wall for five years to elect one corrupt
Democrat after another. No matter how obvious the lies become, the more they repeat them. One of the biggest
loads of excrement I have seen came out of the mouths of the Washington Post editorial board on Friday [8/28/2020] when they
had the garbage headline "Global Freedom would suffer grievous harm in a second Trump Term." They claim that this will
happen because he embraces dictators and he is rejecting U.S. democracy. They know they are lying because the facts
show that it was Obama/Biden who catered throughout their eight years to dictators, and they know that Trump's policies and
actions have been much harsher toward the dictators and tyrants.
The media and those who want to
curry favor with the media have a dual agenda. All of what has made the media even less trusted by the public
than Congress and used car salesmen was on display last week with the reporting from Kenosha, Wisconsin. Over the past
few days due to the shooting of Jacob Blake, the media converged on the city using the same playbook that worked for them in
Minneapolis earlier this summer. First, spread misinformation and half-baked reporting, then help light the fuse for
violent riots and social chaos, then staggeringly pretend that the protests are "fiery but mostly peaceful." In the case
of Blake, the initial reporting indicated that the man was simply walking away from police for no apparent reason before
being shot seven times. That reporting alone, with no context or additional information touched off a level of
violence, looting, property damage, and physical harm more common to the nightly rioting in Chicago than a suburban community
in Wisconsin. A day later, the important facts that a responsible media might have sought out before reporting told a
somewhat different story. Blake's girlfriend had called police fearing for her and her children's safety. Police
attempted to calm the situation, but when Blake continued to be perceived as a threat, police attempted to use a taser.
Blake ran to his car and police believe he was reaching for a knife when he was shot. No doubt, the police use of force
must be part of this investigation. But none of the above facts that would have added important context were part of
any initial reporting on the scene, creating a very different narrative that played into the hands of Black Lives Matter
terrorists and Antifa scum headed to Kenosha on Monday.
What does
'without evidence' mean? President Trump spoke mildly in defense of Kenosha shooter Kyle Rittenhouse on
Tuesday, saying that the 17-year-old seemed to be defending himself when he shot three people, killing two of them.
NPR, fresh off of interviewing In Defense of Looting author Vicky Osterweil, had something stern to say about that,
tweeting 'President Trump declined to condemn the actions of the suspected 17-year-old shooter of three protesters against
police brutality in Kenosha — claiming, without evidence, that it appeared the gunman was acting in self-defense.'
Without evidence! Cockburn tries to live an upright life these days, but he had to pause for a moment to
be sure he had not mistakenly consumed peyote or some other mind-altering substance. Without evidence? The entire
Rittenhouse episode was caught on tape. You can watch both shootings on YouTube, along with lengthy dissections of what
they show. You can watch him get interviewed immediately before the shooting. Without evidence? Kyle
Rittenhouse's night in Kenosha is one of the single best-documented shootings of all time.
Larry
Schweikart: How the 24-Hour News Cycle is Leading the Loss of the English Language. Plenty of
commentators have dealt with the lunacy that affects the English language today, from banning certain words as "racist,"
"sexist," or "something-ist." Certainly that's obvious to all. But there is another, more subtle change going on,
even among the "friendly" or "reliable news pages. It began when the 24-hour news cycle started to run out of, well,
news. It took more than a decade for this development to settle in. At first, the networks filled the void with
simply more talking heads, guests, and "analysts" telling you what the news was. More recently however — I
started really noticing it during the Mueller investigation — a host of non-news words began to creep into news
stories. We began to see mush phrases such as "Mueller mulling demand that Trump testify," or "Mueller
considering charging Don, Jr." These kinds of hourly non-news stories utterly took over, for reporters weren't
supposed to know what was happening in the first place (the investigation after all — wink, wink, nudge,
nudge — was to be secret. Since the Mueller team was leaking like the Titanic however, so-called
journalists could not produce actual documents to prove anything. As it turned out, in fact, they had nothing to prove
anything with. Instead, reporters reverted to the post-1980 favorite journalistic trick, the "unnamed source." Realize
it was not all that long ago that no reputable newspaper would ever run a piece with a single "anonymous source." Indeed,
according to a Chicago Tribune reporter I interviewed during a foreword I wrote for Professor Jim Kuypers' book,
Partisan Journalism (2013), every major fact in a story was to be doubly sourced with public sources. In case
you didn't notice, "mulling," "considering," "poised to," "about to," "prepared to," "intends," and other
such mush words are utterly unprovable.
Black
Assimilation Is The Great Threat To Democrats. If there was one moment during the Republican convention that
caused my official Daily Wire Leftist Tears Tumbler to magically overflow, it was in a speech by former Ambassador to the
U.N. Nikki Haley. "In much of the Democratic Party, it's now fashionable to say that America is racist," Haley
said. "That is a lie. America is not a racist country." Democrats and the media — but I repeat
myself — reacted swiftly. "I'm just hung up a little bit about Nikki Haley," said hung up ABC Anchor
Linsey Davis. "A comment that she made, 'America is not a racist country.' I think that that's a statement that a
lot of black people, black and brown people, would take umbrage with." Chicago Tribune columnist Dahleen Glanton was
blunter, saying the statement made Haley "appear to be either disgracefully ignorant or a blatant liar." But, of
course, what Haley really was, was completely correct. There is a history of institutional racism in America, no doubt,
but today our country is wholly free of it. The U.S. is easily the least racist nation on the planet.
The Editor says...
This country is NOT "wholly free" of institutional racism. What do you
call this?
And this?
And this?
Is Kwanzaa an American institution? Is Black History Month an American institution?
If
you want to see media malice in a single article.... The second night of the Republican convention has come and
gone (and very successfully too) but what should live forever is the article the New York Times wrote about the
line-up of speakers for the evening. It is a triumph of misdirection and fraud by omission. It may well be the
most perfect example ever of how the media functions, not to inform, but to mislead. The article, entitled "How to
Watch the Republican National Convention," gives practical advice about how to find the convention on the internet and
television. Interestingly, it does not mention C-SPAN, which is proving to be a preferred venue for many conservative
viewers. What's really fascinating, though, is what the Times says and does not say about some of the speakers.
The
Dangerous Half-Truths Behind 'The Joe Show'. If you watched last week's Democratic National Convention you
couldn't help but notice an overwhelming theme that ran throughout "the Joe Show". The well-produced and heartwarming images
of the former Vice-President were front and center, evoking sympathy and admiration for a man who has endured multiple
tragedies throughout his half-century career in politics. But those images were also on display to underscore the
belief amongst the overwhelming number of Democrats, who, united only in their disdain for President Trump, believe him to
be, at best, morally inept, and at worst, actively evil. By shining a light on "Saint Joe," they cast a shadow on the
man who currently occupies the Oval Office, a man who is apparently both all-powerful and simultaneously incompetent. A
man who CNN would have you believe single-handedly spread the coronavirus from coast to coast, all but ensuring that
countless Americans would find themselves unemployed in the economic downturn that followed.
New
York Times Manipulates FBI Lawyer's Guilty Plea To Hide Real Spygate News. A New York Times reporter who won a
Pulitzer Prize for his role perpetrating the Russia collusion hoax was tasked with framing the news that a former top FBI
lawyer was to plead guilty to deliberately fabricating evidence against a Donald Trump campaign affiliate targeted in the
Russia probe. The resulting article is a case study in how to write propaganda. Adam Goldman broke, and
cushioned, the news that former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith was to plead guilty to fabricating evidence in a Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant application to spy on Trump campaign affiliate Carter Page. His job was to
present the news as something other than an indictment of the FBI's handling of the Russia collusion hoax, to signal to other
media that they should move on from the story as quickly as possible, and to hide his own newspaper's multi-year
participation in the Russia collusion hoax. One intelligence source described it as an "insult" to his intelligence and
"beyond Pravda," a reference to the official newspaper of the Communist Party in the Soviet Union. Here's how Goldman
did it. [...]
ABC/NBC
Stoke Conspiracy: Trump Creating 'Mail-In Voting Scandal,' a 'Crisis'. Setting the stage for their excuse
if President Trump won reelection, ABC's Good Morning America and NBC's Sunday Today [8/16/2020] spent the
morning accusing the President of a conspiracy to steal the 2020 election. ABC called it the "mail-in voting scandal"
while NBC dubbed it the "Postal Service crisis;" accusing Postmaster General Louis DeJoy of allegedly doing Trump's dirty
work, even though they admit they don't have any hard evidence of wrongdoing. Near the top of ABC's coverage of the
purported scandal, White House correspondent Rachel Scott leaned on serial liars Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) and Speaker
Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) to make the baseless accusations:
Democrats
Go Postal with Busted Mailbox Conspiracy Theory. Democrats have spent several days flogging the false "mailbox
conspiracy" theory that President Donald Trump is deliberately crippling the U.S. Postal Service so that it cannot handle
votes by mail in November — even forcing it to remove mailboxes. The truth is that the mailboxes were
removed because mailboxes are always being removed. At least 14,000 were removed during the Obama-Biden
administration. Democrats are creating a new hysteria to cast Trump as a tyrant and motivate their
conspiracy-theory-addled voters.
Don't
Let the Fake Fact Checkers Fool You — Joe and Kamala Support Gun Confiscation. Just like Joe Biden,
vice presidential hopeful Kamala Harris supports outright, mandatory gun confiscation. She just disguises it under a
couple of flowery words: "mandatory" and "buyback." This of course is when all of the fake media's fake fact checkers
pour out of the woodwork to lie with the false claim Kamala Harris Never Said She Wanted to Confiscate Guns. We
know the fake fact checkers are going to publish their fake fact checks with their fake claims because that's what the fake
fact checkers did to protect their precious Barry Obama, who also said he wanted to confiscate your guns. Further, the
fake fact checkers published lies to protect Hillary Clinton, who also said she wanted to confiscate your guns. Oh, and
Joe Biden said he wanted to confiscate your gun, and he also used flowery words about "buybacks," and as you will see below,
he has not taken that sentiment back, even after the fake media tried to help him cover up that fact.
Yamiche
Alcindor Cements Her Place as Most Dishonest 'Journalist' After Cutting Trump Quote. There are a lot of
dishonest journalists out there, and I mean a lot of them. To narrow it down is a bit like trying to split an
atom. Sure, it's possible, but man is it difficult. Yet, PBS' Yamiche Alcindor continues to stand above the rest,
both because of her penchant to outright lie, and her tendency to use her race as a shield. Who can forget this classic
on the recent rioting, of which Alcindor assured us there was no evidence they are anarchists. Hilariously, she was
then bombarded with pictures of people present wearing anarchist symbols. [Tweet] And here she is trying to cancel the
black Surgeon General over an innocuous plea to not do drugs and alcohol. Her shtick is to provide "context" while never
defining who exactly she's talking about. It's a cheap game some journalists play when they want to editorialize but
want to pretend it's not editorializing. [Another tweet] Alcindor is attempting to up her game, though. Yesterday,
she purposely cut the context out of a Trump quote so she could proclaim it a "moment to behold." [Yet another tweet]
Touting
Kamala Harris as a moderate is a liberal dose of deception. The New York Times was quick out of the blocks with
the Democratic pitch that Kamala Harris is a "pragmatic moderate." It's pulling your leg. Joe Biden's running mate
had the most liberal voting record in the Senate last year — surpassing even Bernie Sanders — according
to government watchdog GovTrack. Harris advocates late-term abortion, thinks Catholics are not fit to serve on the
Supreme Court, has tried to criminalize climate-change denial and the manufacture of guns, wants to give taxpayer-funded
health care to illegal immigrants and, as California's attorney general, wielded power like a callous autocrat. But, if
by pragmatic, the Times means this Barack Obama protegé will be whatever you want her to be, it's correct. Her
record shows her to be a gifted shapeshifter.
AG
Barr On Far-Left Extremism: Media Is Censoring What's Happening, Americans Are Being 'Told A Lie'.
Attorney General William Barr told Fox News host Mark Levin during an interview Sunday that the mainstream media are lying
about the far-left violence that has been playing out in the streets across America over recent weeks. "We have the
citizen reporters, who have these videos of these events, which are quite different than what we get a lot of times from the
media, which seems to be censoring the violence," Levin said to Barr. "No?" "Absolutely. Their
narrative — they are projecting a narrative," Barr said. "When the word narrative came into currency, I knew
we were in trouble, because the word narrative really suggests that there's no objective truth. There's no real story
of what happened, it's just everyone has their own narrative." "And you get to then — the press can justify
presenting a story that doesn't really correspond to objective truth, but it's our narrative. We have a narrative, you
have a narrative," Barr continued. "I've been appalled at — on this violence, because it's happening right
out in the streets, anyone with eyes can see what's happening. They see the violence."
'Defund the Police'
is a media fantasy. If you've paid any attention to the news, particularly cable news, over the last couple of
months since George Floyd's killing by police in Minneapolis, you might think "defunding" or "abolishing" the police is a
widely held and even somewhat mainstream desire. Gallup suggests this is untrue. The vast majority of Americans
of all races and ethnicities don't want the police to leave their communities.
7-year-old
boy in Georgia died 'from COVID-19'? Media leaving out key details. [Scroll down] So it seems that the
boy died not "from COVID-19," but rather as the result of a seizure and a fall in the shower. It seems that, prior to
his death, the child had zero Wuhan virus symptoms, and that after he was pronounced dead, "a rapid test showed evidence of
COVID-19 positivity." I don't know about you, but I've followed the news and the science on this virus as closely as
most anyone, and I have yet to hear any reports of the Wuhan virus causing seizures. If this were the case —
especially where children are concerned — it is a virtual guarantee that the media would have daily told us
so. It would seem that fair and accurate reporting of this incident would include all of the circumstances surrounding
this terrible tragedy and that this is almost certainly another example of someone dying with the Wuhan virus and not
from it. All the media have done here is give us another reason not to trust them in this grave matter.
America's
Most Gullible Journalist: "Visit Portland!". Whom to believe? Videos of the riots? Or smug
journalists telling us that they saw nothing untoward? Luckily, there's the Newspaper of Record to give us the
truth. Unluckily, The New York Times sent ... Nicholas Kristof, aka the most easily fooled journalist in
America. Kristof assured Times readers that the Portland crowds are "entirely peaceful," until around 11 p.m.,
when "some protesters begin to shoot fireworks or set small trash fires." Small trash fires. Also: the federal
courthouse, the Justice Center offices, statues, the Portland police union hall, and a decapitated pig's head, among other
arsons. But Kristof also dismissively remarked: "No, they're not trying to burn down the federal courthouse."
Do not trust the dozens of videos showing protesters trying to burn down the federal courthouse. He further reports
that — just as MSNBC has said! — "the most violent behavior overwhelmingly comes from the federal
agents." So there you have it. You can believe the man who said, "Mao's legacy is not all bad," or you can
believe your lying eyes.
Floyd
Bodycam Leak Highlights Press Collusion With Government. The British Daily Mail on Monday scooped
American news media with the leaked police body cam footage. To be clear, the footage does not exonerate the police
officers although it provides considerable context not previously available. Floyd refused several police orders
including not making his hands visible during the initial traffic stop to resisting entering a patrol car. In the
video, Floyd complains about difficulty breathing before the infamous knee-on-the-neck pose. His shortness of
breath may have been a symptom of an advancing drug overdose that ultimately may have contributed to his death. The
autopsy indicated a quantity of 11 ng/mL of fentanyl in Floyd's blood. One study of 143 postmortem analyses of
fentanyl overdoses found a median level of 9.8ng/mL in the blood of people believed to have died from overdosing on the
drug. Setting that aside, the way in which the new information came to light is further indication that American
news media cannot be trusted to cover and report facts.
The
Perils of Pretending a War is Something Else. [Scroll down] Here's an equally scary current charade: the
straight-faced claim by Democrat leaders and their media enablers that there are only "peaceful protests" in the streets of our 400
torched cities — no riots, looting and arsons, no rioters, looters and arsonists associated with Black Lives Matter and
Antifa communists. Instead, the denial that the mayhem which has injured thousands and cost more than a dozen lives are only
possible because of the support of lawless Democrat mayors and city councils who are preoccupied with disarming the police. [...]
The fact that there have been no serious attempts by "peaceful protesters" to denounce the violence and the organizations that
perpetrated it — speaks volumes to the effect that they consider themselves allies of the rioters and share their
agendas. Defunding the police, leaving the most vulnerable in society without protection against criminals is the goal of
rioters, arsonists, looters, and so-called "peaceful protesters." The charade protects the criminals and their crimes.
ABC
Ignores Leaked Video of George Floyd Arrest; CBS & NBC Caught Editing Out "Stop Resisting". Body cam footage
from the arrest of George Floyd has been leaked. But instead of leaking through a U.S. media outlet, the footage was
given to the U.K.'s Daily Mail, which posted the footage online. Why would someone give the body cam footage to a
foreign media entity? Well... we can't know for certain, but we have a pretty good guess: whoever leaked this
footage KNEW that the American fake news media would IGNORE this story. And for the most part, they have. ABC
News spiked the story completely. And CBS and NBC were both caught editing out parts of the body cam footage that go
against the national BLM narrative.
America is engaged
in a religious war. [Scroll down] Marxism also has its saints and martyrs. In classic Marxism, they
would have been poor people exploited by evil capitalists. In America, however, with its extraordinary economic and
social mobility, that's not going to fly. Instead, the saints and martyrs are racial figures. Trayvon Martin is
transformed from a violent, drugged-out, small-time thug into a childish, smiling figure who could have been the son of
America's black president. Michael Brown is not a hulking figure who engaged in strong-arm robbery and tried to steal a
police officer's weapon. He's a "gentle giant." And lastly, George Floyd is not a violent felon and petty criminal
who held a gun against a pregnant woman's stomach, and who was so hopped up on fentanyl and a variety of other intoxicants
that it's unlikely he would have survived the night (and his inability to breath[e] probably arose from acute fentanyl
intoxication). Instead, he's a beloved family man whose image blooms on urban walls across America.
Sorry,
Wearing Masks Is Anything but Harmless. Here are 5 Reasons Why. [#3] The establishment media makes it a
point to run headlines containing meaningless scary-sounding factoids and manipulative stories about those who've allegedly
succumbed to the virus. When its supposed death tally was climbing, we couldn't escape hearing about it. As it
started to fall, they started ignoring the number of deaths and shifted over to reporting about rising cases, also neglecting
to mention that rising cases and falling deaths is a good thing. The media has done nothing to make the public aware
that a local CBS affiliate looked into 589 alleged Palm Beach fatalities and discovered that far less than a third (169) had
actually died of the virus. Nor have they reported that the COVID-19 death tally they terrorized the nation with for
months includes motor-cycle fatalities and gunshot victims. Most people who did hear about these stories were
shocked. But, if the press had been doing its job, they wouldn't have been. Another crucial fact of which they've
failed to inform the public is that counting vast numbers who didn't die from COVID-19 among its fatalities is a feature, not
a bug. Everyone who dies with the virus is being counted as dying from it.
How
It's Done: Colorado Reporter Puts on a Clinic in How to Accurately Report on Violent Rioters. As we've
previously documented, the gaslighting from the MSM on the violent left-wing riots that have taken place in Democrat-run
parts of the country over the last two months has been absolutely out of control. There is literally not a day that
goes by where there is not some glaring instance of a media outlet like the New York Times or Reuters painting protests as
"mostly peaceful" or otherwise "dying down" until federal law enforcement officers have the nerve to step in to stop the
anarchy. Violent agitators in these reports are almost always referred to as "protesters." Along with that, excuses are
often made for their violent actions, as though just the mere presence of state and/or federal law enforcement officers on
the scene to protect innocent citizens and federal property is excuse enough for the agitators to try and blind them with
laser beams and hurt them with the nail-studded projectiles they hurl. One Colorado reporter, however, went against the
MSM "peaceful protester" grain in a recent report he filed on the Aurora, CO protests and riots that happened over the weekend.
No,
New York did not get coronavirus 'under control'. Someone is going to have to explain how exactly the media are
defining "under control" as it pertains to the coronavirus because it's a phrase that appears to mean nothing.
Reuters over the weekend continued the campaign to rehabilitate Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo's image by
asserting, as other news outlets have laughably done before, that New York is in tip-top shape, especially compared to that
Republican-led state Florida. (Ew!) "The surge in Florida has continued as the state's Republican Governor Ron DeSantis
has repeatedly said he will not make mask-wearing mandatory and that schools must reopen in August," Reuters reported
on Sunday [7/26/2020]. "On the contrary, New York state has managed to get the virus under control, with stores and
restaurants shuttered and the wearing of masks mandatory."
Trusting
the Election to the Mr. and Ms. Potato Heads of the Left-Media. Florida and Texas combined have
more than 55 electoral votes. [...] It seems very likely that in 2020 Florida could go either way — either
[D]emocrat or [R]epublican. Texas seems to present an even greater threat to [D]emocrats. [...] We don't see
left-leaning, liberal media outlets publishing articles with headlines reading, "Texas — Lower Concentration of
COVID-19 Infections than 19 other States" or "Seven States/Territories with higher COVID-19 Death Rates than Florida."
Headlines like these might indicate that Trump is handling the COVID-19 Crisis adequately. CNN and their
"Mr./Ms. Potato Head" Common-tators (pun intended), reporters, editors, and writers are not working to educate the U.S.
population with neutral, unbiased information about Florida and Texas, the two key states in the 2020 presidential
election. However, they are working to campaign for the left, for the Democrats. They are working to push a
non-Trump, non-Republican, pro-panic agenda, and they are doing it to sabotage President Trump and the Republican Party.
Are
Fake News Polls Hiding a Potential Trump Landslide? Listen to network or cable news and you will hear that the
November election is over. Joe Biden has a growing double-digit lead over President Trump, despite the election being
over three months away and the issues that may decide the election largely unknown at present. What do the polls
say? Biden's campaign manager, also known as CNN, has their "poll of polls" described as, "the five most recent
national telephone polls measuring the view of registered voters." Considering that only 58 percent of eligible voters went
to the polls in 2016, CNN's "poll of polls" may not be particularly representative of the electorate. CNN's headline
screams déjà vu, "Biden maintains a double-digit lead over Trump nationally." That's it then, the election
is over. Trump supporters may as well pack it up and stay home. At least that is what they want you to believe.
Florida
Is A Case Study In Media-Induced COVID-19 Panic. What do all these news accounts have in common?
"Florida Sets Yet Another Coronavirus Record: 173 Deaths In A Day." "A record 173 Floridians died from the virus Thursday,
an average of more than one every eight minutes." "The 134 new confirmed deaths is the second-largest increase on record,
coming five days after the largest one-day jump of 156 last week." "COVID-19 has ravaged Florida, with more than 237,000
people testing positive and 2,013 dying from the virus in July alone." So what characteristic do all of the reports
share? They are all false. It is not true that 173 people died from COVID-19 "in a day" in Florida. Nor did
134, or 156 on previous days. It is also untrue than 2,013 had died in July when that story was published. All of
these scary headlines are based on the number of deaths reported by the state on any given day. This is not the
same as the number of deaths that occurred on those days.
A Put-Up Job. [Scroll down] The
news matters for three reasons. First, almost all the public investigation and damaging narrative about "Trump-Russia
collusion" came after investigators knew how little supporting evidence there was. Second, the more we learn
about the ensuing investigations, the more they look like concerted abuses of government authority. We give
law-enforcement and intelligence agencies tremendous power so they can protect us; when they abuse that power, they need to
be held accountable and reined in. That seldom happens to anyone in Washington's sprawling bureaucracies, which protect
their own within the gurgling ecosystem of power, profit, regulation, and rent-seeking. Just ask Lois Lerner.
Third, when the FBI, Department of Justice, and intelligence agencies act in biased, partisan, and illicit ways, they cut to
the very heart of our constitutional democracy, damage our institutions, and undermine trust in them. That is exactly
what happened in 2016 and afterward. Public trust was undermined by these prolonged investigations and the narrative
about them. It will be undermined further as we learn how the investigators themselves likely pursued partisan goals,
ignored crucial evidence, and broke laws to do it.
The
Constitution, Donald Trump, and 2020. [The news media] would have us ignore the multiple scenes of violence and
misplaced anger displayed through more objective and independent sources. The protests were "mostly peaceful" chirped
CNN, even as a crowd broke the glass of its Atlanta headquarters and ransacked it. The real troublemakers were not the
legitimate protestors, MSNBC reassured its remaining viewers, but actually white supremacists who had deftly infiltrated
Black Lives Matter protests in a dozen plus cities to spread violence and wreak havoc. Pay no attention to the
extensive video footage showing protestors of all stripes and colors performing stupefying acts of vandalism. Although
most of the major media outlets long ago ceased dispensing accurate information to the American citizenry, they nevertheless
have retained just enough viewers to help fan the flames of this 21st-century Bonfire of the Vanities. They also
continue to press and fold weak-minded politicians like threadbare laundry.
The
Big Surge In Coronavirus Deaths Is A Media-Fed Myth. Almost daily now we've been reading about how daily deaths
from COVID-19 have reached record highs. It's a scary prospect. But the truth is the mainstream press is grossly
misleading the public by misreporting the death counts. [...] According to PBS in Arizona, the state "on Saturday
(July 18) set a record for coronavirus-related deaths reported in one day, with 147, according to the Arizona Department
of Health Services." The last story is particularly illuminating because the website the PBS article links to includes
a chart of daily deaths in the state. It lists only six deaths on July 19. What's more, the chart shows that
there have only been two days where deaths exceeded 65. So where did that scary 147 number come from? The same
place all the other "surging" numbers come from. Each day Arizona and other states file reports on how many people died
from COVID-19. It's not a measure of how many died that day. In most cases, the people died days or even weeks
earlier. In fact, in Arizona's case, 106 of the reported deaths on Saturday resulted from a periodic review of death
certificates. None of those caveats made it into the PBS story.
Trans
man sues hospital after hysterectomy is canceled. A transgender man is suing the University of Maryland Medical
System in federal court, claiming his rights were violated when his gender-affirming surgery was canceled by one of the
hospital system's subsidiaries.
The Editor says...
A "transgender man" is a woman who pretends to be a man. The term "gender-affirming surgery" is an inversion of the
truth. Those are two lies in the first sentence alone.
How
to Spank the Establishment Media. If one disapproves of the lying and distortions put out by the mainstream
media, there's a way to fight it: don't pay for it. But how, you might ask, can I do that? Well, "Meet the Press"
is pumped out by NBC News. So, if you object to the lies on NBC News or to the lies on its vile sister, MSNBC, then you
might consider financially spanking the company that ultimately owns them... Comcast. If Comcast cannot bring itself to
do anything about its news operations, then it would be up to viewers to send the corporation a message. There are
several ways to do this. The most obvious way is to drop Xfinity, Comcast's cable service. And here's what's nice
about that: if one switches to a different cable company, one is likely to get a special price for the first year or
more. There are a few folks who "game the system" by periodically changing their cable provider just to take advantage
of introductory deals. Changing providers might be a hassle, but at least one won't be enriching NBC's parent company.
Lower
than dirt? Jon Turley clears up who is worse, NBC News' Chuck Todd or CNN's Jim Acosta. Legal scholar
Jonathan Turley slammed NBC News' Chuck Todd for airing a "false narrative" in the misleading quote of White House press
secretary Kayleigh McEnany. The George Washington University law professor called out the "Meet the Press" host who
"knowingly played a false gotcha clip" in a move that he deemed worse than the one by CNN's Jim Acosta, who came under heavy
fire for tweeting an out-of-context quote from McEnany.
Media
told America FBI had proof of collusion as bureau was realizing it had nothing. Despite what The New York Times
and Washington Post were loudly reporting in early 2017, the FBI had failed to find any evidence of Trump-Russia
"collusion" — and indeed had found that the central source of those claims was a joke. This is a key
takeaway from the Justice Department's latest release of documents from the FBI's investigation. One shocker is the
summary of the long FBI interview that January with the "Primary Subsource" for the infamous Steele dossier —
indeed, about the only source.
Fake News
Becomes a Way of Life. In December 2016, Ben Smith, then BuzzFeed's editor-in-chief, wrote a memo to his staff
that was meant to be a kind of charter for the dawning of the Trump Era. In truth it spoke to and aimed to speak for
the entire mainstream media. Smith would eventually move on to the New York Times, which elevated him to a role
as the supervisory voice of conscience for the whole media. But that December, he warned his staff of the danger of
fake news, and the need of the media to be accurate and factual.
Chris
Wallace Is Wrong, Joe Biden Does Want to Defund the Police. Social media is abuzz over the release of a clip of
President Trump's interview with Fox News' Chris Wallace, where the Fox News host "fact-checked" Trump's claim that Joe Biden
wants to defund the police. "It's gotten totally out of control and it's really because they want to defund the police,
and Biden wants to defund the police," Trump said in the clip. "Sir, he does not," Wallace shot back. You can
watch the exchange below. [...]
Kayleigh
McEnany is so effective that the MSM now lying by deceptively editing her comments. Yesterday [7/16/2020] saw a
new low in irresponsible media reporting on a briefing by a presidential press secretary. Many media outlets outright
lied about what Kayleigh McEnany said by cutting her off mid-sentence in a comment on schools reopening, thereby creating an
impression that was opposite of the truth. [...] Kayleigh McEnany has been devastatingly effective as President Trump's press
secretary, holding the media accountable for their lies and letting viewers of her press briefings know what questions the
pressies are not asking but should. This campaign of lies is evidence that the MSM knows she is a threat to their
ability to fulfill their political function as propagandists and have decided to unite in lies about her.
The
New York Times Has Been Ridiculous for a Long Time. The much discussed resignation letter from New York Times
op-ed editor Bari Weiss was written in the metaphorical equivalent of Braille. It allowed even the blind to see what
the rest of us have known for years: the Times is a joke. Writes Weiss of the Times newsroom, "Truth isn't a process
of collective discovery, but an orthodoxy already known to an enlightened few whose job is to inform everyone else." Indeed,
the only difference between the Times and the old Soviet Pravda is that Pravda readers knew they were being lied to.
America's
Reporters and Editors Are Liars. It is impossible to overstate how low "journalism" has fallen in the United
States. [...] A sound adage holds that you should never assume malice when stupidity is a sufficient explanation. Here,
the only explanation is malice. No one is as stupid as America's reporters and editors pretend to be. The
sooner their companies go out of business, the better.
MSNBC
Thinks the Russia Hoax Will Still Work on You in 2020. As the 2020 presidential election fast approaches, so do
media attempts to incite voter hysteria about the chances of it being stolen. On Tuesday's Morning Joe, dutiful MSNBC
co-host Willie Geist brought on left-wing author David Shimer and former Obama Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson to try
to rebuild the Russian election interference narrative. [Video clip]
Fake news! Did the [New
York] Times Print an Urban Legend? This week, the Times brings us a story from Methodist Hospital in San
Antonio. The headline is: "Texas Hospital Says Man, 30, Died After Attending a 'Covid Party,'" and what we get is
a story with one source. [...] It's a morality tale, really. Don't believe it's a hoax! Or that you aren't at
risk because you are young! Maybe don't live in a bad red state where they aren't taking COVID seriously, or go to
these parties. The only thing missing was a MAGA hat and a rueful dying admission, "I shouldn't have trusted Trump or
my Republican governor!" But, as I read the story originally earlier this week, I realized the details didn't quite
add up. If you believe COVID is a hoax, why would you attend a "Covid Party?" And, in a pandemic for an
airborne disease, aren't all parties potentially COVID parties? Chicken pox parties were aimed at spreading a local
infection purposely to younger children who have milder cases. People don't hold them because they are skeptics.
Something doesn't make sense.
It's
just nuts to praise New York's 'success' against coronavirus. If only the rest of the country could handle
COVID as well as New York: That's the lament of progressive commentators as COVID cases spike in the Sun Belt and the
South. Washington Post columnist Jennifer Rubin hailed New York City the other day after it reported no deaths for the
first time during the pandemic. This is what competent government can accomplish, she gushed. Former Obama aide
Valerie Jarrett tweeted, "Short term sacrifice saves lives!!!" [...] This is all perverse given that New York is only now
emerging from one of the worst COVID debacles on the planet.
Behind
the Media's Breathtakingly Dishonest Coverage. "I don't think I've ever seen such dishonest and biased coverage
of any event." That was Brit Hume, who has been covering events for more than 50 years for Fox News, ABC News and
investigative reporter Jack Anderson. The event, as you may have guessed, was President Donald Trump's Independence
(without the scare-quotes) Day speech at Mount Rushmore. The speech was, according to The New York Times, a "dark and
divisive speech" designed to deliver a "divisive culture war message." The Washington Post called it a "dystopian speech" and
a "push to amplify racism." Absent from their stories were quotations supporting racism. Nor did Illinois
Democratic Sen. Tammy Duckworth supply any quotations to support her claim that Trump "spent all his time talking about
dead traitors." Trump mentioned no Confederates but did quote the "Battle Hymn of the Republic."
The
most dishonest, biased news coverage of our lifetimes — and it's about to get worse. What really seems to have
raised the press' hackles was Trump's dissent from their reverent attitudes toward Black Lives Matter and apparent indifference to those
tearing down statues of Lincoln, Douglass, Grant, abolitionists and women's-rights advocates. "Angry mobs are trying to tear down
statues of our Founders, deface our most sacred memorials and unleash a wave of violent crime in our cities," Trump said, accurately.
That's not the message most in the media want voters receiving in the months running up to November.
The
Media and 2020: Deja vu All Over Again. Over the past few months, the New York Times and the Washington Post
scorned those who wanted to reopen their businesses after investing their entire livelihood into them, because they realized
that destroying the Trump economy would hurt him at the polls in November. [...] The media that has been so dishonest in
covering the health pandemic and the riots is now claiming that Trump's reelection prospects are falling apart due to his
slumping poll numbers. In reality, they are struggling to find positive things to write about Joe Biden, so they need
to continue to deflect any coverage of him by attributing failures to Trump. [...] Before the coronavirus came over from
China, the Trump economy was booming, so naturally they chose to ignore it. They never cared to mention the more than
7 million new jobs that were created since his election, or a rising income for median households that grew by $1,834 in
the first ten months of 2019, or the 1.4 million Americans who were lifted out of poverty.
This
Is How the Media Lies to the American People: The Carsyn Leigh Davis Coronavirus Story. We really are at
a point in America that you can no longer trust the mainstream media on even the most basic reporting. They will always
put their personal spin on a story to sway your thinking. Florida teenager Carsyn Leigh Davis died on June 23rd in Fort
Myers, Florida from "complications from coronavirus." [...] This is the latest example of the panic porn promoted by the
liberal mainstream media. What the media is hiding from the public in their headline is that Carsyn battled cancer and
suffered from an auto-immune disease. Her parents gave Carsyn hydroxychloroquine but the 17-year-old succumbed to the
disease anyway. It's not until you read into the reporting that you find out about Carsyn's battle with disease.
The headlines were specifically written to make you feel that teens are at great risk. They're not.
The
media says hospitals are out of beds, but here is the real story. [Scroll down] In a recent report by
Miami-Dade, it shows that they have a capacity of 434 ICU beds typically. The other interesting number is that they can
convert 532 additional beds to ICU beds if needed. So the media would have you to believe that they are entirely out of
ICU beds, but that's simply not the case. Yes, this is a strain on the healthcare system. Yes, the virus has
spread much more than previous, but we need to be honest, we knew it would. In every instance of guidance that was
given by the CDC, the information was clear. Extreme measures would only slow the spread of the virus. Every
safety precaution that is taken only attempts to slow the spread; it does not stop the spread. Many states and the
media are pushing the initiative that wearing masks and handwashing will stop the spread of coronavirus. The truth is,
it cannot stop the virus. There is not a magic fabric or chemical in hand sanitizer that prevents it. We can only
try to contain it. This is where the mainstream media and many state health leaders have continued to mislead the
American people.
COVID
Deaths Plummet, But the So-Called News Remains Negative. Now, let's get into some COVID-19 news and, folks, are
you asking yourself what of any of this is true and what isn't? It's almost like the tale of two viruses. We have
an entire group of stories that are about how much worse the virus is. "[...] It's worse than we thought. We haven't
even gotten to the second wave. Dr. Fauci says, Dr. Fauci says, Dr. Fauci says." Whatever Dr. Fauci
says, it gets amplified. We are told how so many more people are getting it. The number of cases is skyrocketing,
but then deaths are down. We demonstrated this yesterday. The number of deaths associated with COVID-19 are way
down. It's why they're not being reported. The game here is to scare you into siding up with a new
lockdown. They want you to hear all these brand-new numbers of cases as deaths. But deaths are down. The
curve was flattened.
The
Media Outright Lied About Hydroxychloroquine Just to Destroy Trump. The media has spent the last four months
outright lying about the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine just to destroy President Donald Trump. Washington D.C.
journalist Drew Holden recently took the time to compile a large number of stories built entirely on lies pushed by the
left-wing media. Holden jumped to his Twitter account with an amazing thread that has to be seen to see the lies spread
by our sold-out, anti-American media.
America
Must Hold the Corrupt News Media Accountable in Order to Survive. We must find a way to hold the corrupt
corporate news media accountable before they destroy our country. That's been a consistent theme here at Today's
Campaign Update for four years now (today is the 4th anniversary of the very first Campaign Update posted on my Facebook page
during the heat of the 2016 campaign), and it has become more urgent than ever. Because, as I noted yesterday, the
media literally has the deaths of an untold number of Americans on its hands due to its focused disinformation campaign
related to Hydroxychloroquine.
How
the Left Creates Fake Studies to Fabricate Right-Wing Terrorism. After weeks of violence, Democrats have some
public relations needs to redirect attention away from the awfulness of leftism. Insert the latest report from the
Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), which concludes that the greatest domestic threat comes not from
leftists or Muslims, but from right-wing terrorists! The CSIS study's findings are not new. The New America
Foundation (NAF) and the Center of Investigative Reporting (CIR) have published similar studies with the same
conclusions. Each study is fake, but the most recent CSIS study is the most pathetic of them all — partly
because the CSIS doesn't provide a list of incidents to fact-check. Just trust them. There's an art to creating
this type of propaganda, which provides the Democrat narrative a halo of credibility. A tremendous volume of subtle
manipulation is concocted within studies on right-wing terrorism, and each demonstrates variations of the same basic formula.
Univision
Must Retract Story On June 2020 Jobs Report. If ever there were doubts that Univision is an activist
organization passing itself off as a journalistic entity, then look no further than its reporting on the jobs report for June
2020. Watch below as the network hides one big piece of news with relevance to the Hispanic community, then completely
and blatantly misrepresent another: [Video clip]
CNN's
Cuomo Accuses Mark McCloskey of Being the 'Face of White Resistance' to Black Lives Matter. Tuesday
[6/30/2020], on his CNN program, host Chris Cuomo challenged St. Louis homeowner Mark McCloskey on the merits of his
use of self-defense of life and property by brandishing a firearm in front of his home as a mob of protesters threatened him
and his wife. According to Cuomo, by doing so, McCloskey and his wife had become the "face of white resistance" to the
Black Lives Matter protest movement.
Media
Are Playing Games Yet Again With Anonymous Russia Leaks. Much of the case for the Iraq War was based on the
Bush administration's claim that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction. When the United States declared
an end to the war late in 2011, more than 4,400 American military members had been killed and nearly 32,000 wounded. No
weapons of mass destruction had been found. It's one of the most significant and catastrophic intelligence errors in
U.S. history. A bipartisan commission found that U.S. intelligence "seriously misjudged" Iraq's weapons program because
of their "heavy reliance on a human source — codenamed 'Curveball' — whose information later proved to
be unreliable." The commission wrote, "Even more misleading was the river of intelligence that flowed from the CIA to top
policymakers over long periods of time — in the President's Daily Brief (PDB)" and other reports that were "more
alarmist" and "less nuanced."
The
Media Is Lying About The 'Second Wave'. For months, the Washington Post and the rest of the mainstream media
kept a morbid Covid-19 "death count" on their front pages and at the top of their news broadcasts. The coronavirus
outbreak was all about the number of dead. The narrative was intended to boost governors like Cuomo in New York and
Whitmer in Michigan, who turned their states authoritarian under the false notion that destroying people's jobs, freedom, and
lives would somehow keep a virus from doing what viruses always do: spread through a population until eventually losing
strength and dying out. The "death count" was always the headline. But then all of a sudden early in June the
mainstream media did a George Orwell and lectured us that it is all about "cases" and has always been all about "cases."
Death, and especially infection fatality rate, were irrelevant. Why? Because from the peak in April, deaths had
decreased by 90 percent and were continuing to crash. That was not terrifying enough so the media pretended this
good news did not exist.
Self-righteous vandals.
Violent left-wing activists have taken to styling themselves as antifa, short for 'anti-fascists', though their
street-fighting tactics resemble nothing so much as the Brownshirt thuggery practiced by fascists themselves. This did
not stop NPR national political correspondent Mara Liasson from likening these hooligans to the heroes of World War
Two. On the anniversary of D-Day, June 6, while America's cities still smoldered after days of riots and looting,
Liasson took to Twitter to call the Normandy invasion the 'biggest antifa rally in history'. Dumb jokes are nothing new
on Twitter. For many liberals today, however, it's no laughing matter. They really do think that America is
fascist, at least whenever a Republican is in the White House, and so petty vandalism is actually a heroic act of
resistance. Knock the head off a statue of Columbus, smash the glass of every storefront on the street, and you're
defeating Adolf Hitler all over again. Such is the state of historical literacy and what passes for the moral
imagination among many with comfortable perches in the national media. You would think that if they had a problem with
the establishment, they should throw the first rock at a mirror. Spare the innocent shopkeepers who pay the price for
antifa antics. Plenty of them are black or immigrants themselves, if that's what matters to the worthies of NPR.
Massive
Trump Crowds Inside and Outside Tulsa BOK Center — 6.7 Million Online Viewers! The liberal
mainstream media can't get their talking points straight. They want to condemn President Trump for holding such a large
rally during the coronavirus pandemic. They also want to lie to Americans that it was a failure and no one showed
up. It must be very difficult being the fake news media these days.
The
Media Are Lying To You About Everything, Including The Riots. In recent days we've heard a steady drumbeat of
lies, distortions, and disingenuousness from the mainstream media about almost every aspect of the unrest now gripping
American cities. The deceit is almost too pervasive and amorphous to describe, but I'm going to try anyway. Over
the weekend we were told, for example, that the looting and violence was being instigated not by left-wing anarchists and
antifa groups but by the media's favorite villains: white supremacists. CNN, whose Atlanta offices were vandalized
Friday, went on and on — without a shred of evidence to back it up — about how white supremacists might
be infiltrating the protests and stirring up trouble. The New York Times, in a report that even quoted a senior police
official in New York City saying outside anarchist groups were coordinating mayhem before the protests began,
nevertheless veered into a long aside about how far-right "accelerationists" were hoping the unrest would bring about a
long-sought second civil war. By Monday [6/15/2020], no one was talking about the white supremacist agitators
anymore. The media had moved on to better, more plausible lies.
BLM
protesters violently attack police cruisers in broad daylight in cities around the US. When it comes to Black
Lives Matter protests, the liberal media continues to sell the American people on the lofty ideas of racial equality while
vilifying police officers on the front lines of the cultural rot seen in urban America. Officers put their lives on the
line to ensure law and order every time they put on the uniform, but that risk has gone up exponentially after the violent
BLM riots over the past two weeks. Cops have been attacked, shot and stabbed, and the attacks continue to this
day — even as the media pushes a "peaceful protesters" narrative.
Frank Luntz tweet.
Tonight [6/11/2020], @ChrisCuomo criticized Trump's economy while using data that stops in 2016. This is complete
incompetence. Journalistically and editorially.
History
Channel Tags Slave-Holding Confederates as Red States. The History Channel in late May produced a mostly
laudable documentary series on Ulysses S. Grant, rightly hailing the legacy of the victorious Union general and the president
who fought for civil rights. However, the series contained what's become a recurring problem in some historical
reflections on the Civil War. Throughout the three part series, the production repeatedly showed the slave-holding
Confederates as red states and the Union north as blue states. In reality, it's the reverse. As anyone familiar
with history knows, the Confederates were Democrats. It was Abraham Lincoln's Republican Party that fought the war to
preserve the union and ultimately to end slavery. As Marine and retired U.S. Army War College professor Daniel Douds
astutely explained Grant's strategy to defeat the Confederates, the on-screen graphic showcased the (incorrect) blue
state/red state dynamic.
Fox
News runs digitally altered images in coverage of Seattle's protests, Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone. This
story has been updated to include an apology Fox News posted on its website on Saturday [6/13/2020]. Fox News
published digitally altered and misleading photos on stories about Seattle's Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone (CHAZ) in what
photojournalism experts called a clear violation of ethical standards for news organizations. As part of a package of
stories Friday about the zone, where demonstrators have taken over several city blocks on Capitol Hill after Seattle police
abandoned the East Precinct, Fox's website for much of the day featured a photo of a man standing with a military-style rifle
in front of what appeared to be a smashed retail storefront. The image was actually a mashup of photos from different
days, taken by different photographers — it was done by splicing a Getty Images photo of an armed man, who had
been at the protest zone June 10, with other images from May 30 of smashed windows in downtown Seattle.
The
Media Urge to Explain away 'Defund the Police'. The hot protest slogan and hashtag of the moment is "Defund the
Police." At times, it's also framed as a call to abolish or disband the police. Ordinary speakers of the English
language would naturally assume, listening to people chant "defund the police" in the streets, carry "defund the police"
signs, and literally paint "defund the police" on the streets of D.C., that such people mean "defund the police." But not
our media! There's been an immediate rush to write pieces explaining that, of course, "defund the police" does
not actually mean "defund the police."
It's
Your Fault They Turn to Violence! According to the media narrative, whatever unpleasant behavior a person or
group is engaging in — from criminal and gang activity to sheer terrorism — if you're white and the
other party is not, that proves that the behavior is entirely your fault. Your insufferable racism and xenophobia have
pushed these people over the edge; their criminal behavior is a reflection of their many grievances against you. This
would certainly require ameliorating if it were true. It's not. [...] A black man was tragically killed by a police
officer. Although he has been arrested and charged with murder, that's not enough. If you're white, the current
turmoil — the looting, burning, and killing — is, once again, ultimately your fault:
"grievances" coming to roost.
A.G.
Barr: "They're Not Peaceful Protesters, That's A Big Lie Promoted By The Media". The attorney general
says what we are thinking — when the media insists that the protesters are peaceful, it is a lie. Many of
them have been violent, enough to wreak havoc and destruction on cities across the country. Tell the small business
owners without insurance who had their storefront windows broken and their merchandise looted that it was just peaceful
protesters upset about the death of George Floyd. What about all the injuries and hospitalizations and even some deaths
that have been the result of protests?
Michael Baden Did Not Perform Autopsy But
You Are Being Told He Did. If Joe Biden was a forensic pathologist his name would be Dr. Michael
Baden. The 85 year old freelance medical examiner has quite a past and a present. In recent days, he has fanned
the flames of "cover-up" by reporting that Mr. George Floyd was indeed choked to death despite the county medical
examiner's finding that Floyd did not die from asphyxiation and he did not die from strangulation. In fact, the autopsy
showed that Floyd had no trauma on his body whatsoever. His ingestion of fentanyl and methamphetamine combined with a
pre-existing heart and hypertension history contributed to his death. And murder charges were brought against Officer
Derek Chauvin because the medical examiner added that the "restraint" also contributed to the death of Floyd. But Baden
made the rounds on national television yesterday [6/2/2020] after he was hired by the family to do a second autopsy.
After
Falsely Claiming Tear Gas Use, Media Now Trying To Pretend Tear Gas And Pepper Spray Are Identical. After the
media reported that Park Police deployed tear gas, an aerosolized version of the synthetic compound
2-chlorobenzalmalononitrile also referred to as "CS gas," to disperse protesters in front of the White House, Park Police
explicitly denied the charge: [...] So it was smoke canisters, not tear gas. And pepper balls explained the irritating
effect that some protesters reported. This directly contradicted thousands of tweets, print articles, and broadcast
stories. President Donald Trump lambasted the media, highlighting a story this writer published yesterday. That
article has some of the headlines from prominent media that falsely claimed "tear gas" was used against "peaceful"
protesters.
Media
Falsely Claimed Violent Riots Were Peaceful And That Tear Gas Was Used Against Rioters. Following days of
violent riots and looting in cities across the country, Washington, D.C., announced a 7 p.m. curfew on Monday night.
About the same time, President Donald Trump addressed the nation from the Rose Garden. Afterward, he walked through
Lafayette Park to St. John's Episcopal Church, which rioters had set on fire the night before. Standing before the
church sign, which reads "All are welcome," President Trump, who previously said he'd be paying his respects to a very
special place, held up a Bible. The speech announcing the country would return to rule of law and protection of civil
liberties, the walk through a park that the night before had been given over to rioters, and the visit to the vandalized
historic church where every president has worshiped since James Madison, were reassuring to many in the country. For
the media, however, these actions were further proof that Orange Man Bad is literally the worst, restoring rule of law is
criminal, and standing in front of a church holding a Bible is an assault on the American conscience.
The
Media Are Lying To You About Everything, Including The Riots. It seems no great event or upheaval in our
national life can pass now without the media lying to our faces about it. They lied about the Trump campaign colluding
with Russia in 2016. They lied about the Mueller probe and Brett Kavanaugh and former national security adviser Mike
Flynn. They lied about Trump's phone call with the Ukrainian president and the impeachment farce that ensued.
They lied about the coronavirus and the lockdowns and the White House response. And now they're lying about the riots.
[...] Over the weekend we were told, for example, that the looting and violence was being instigated not by left-wing
anarchists and antifa groups but by the media's favorite villains: white supremacists. CNN, whose Atlanta offices were
vandalized Friday, went on and on — without a shred of evidence to back it up — about how white
supremacists might be infiltrating the protests and stirring up trouble.
Teen
Vogue: Antifa 'Aspires Toward Creating a Better World'. Leftist outlet Teen Vogue told its readers
that the terrorist organization Antifa "aspires to create a better world" in the wake of riots that have broken out across
the country, which have involved looting, vandalism, businesses being destroyed, beatings, and death. "'Antifa grows out
of a larger revolutionary politics that aspires toward creating a better world, but the primary motivation is to stop racists
from organizing,'" tweeted Teen Vogue on Monday [6/1/2020].
Logic, Rhetoric, and Race.
Most of the blame for this situation belongs to the media, especially cable-news networks, which provide the audience for
performative protests that are as ritualistic as kabuki theater. The opening act is an "incident" involving the death
of a black man at the hands of the police. This is followed by demands for justice, with activists denouncing the
incident as proof of systemic racial oppression. A hashtag campaign emerges on social media platforms, and Hollywood
celebrities lend their voices to the outcry. Cable networks convene panel discussions, and the story is updated hourly
in the days leading up to the protest rally. The participants in this demonstration are "mostly peaceful," we are told,
while we watch the protest turn into a devastating riot in front of our eyes. We have seen this drama performed many
times over the years, especially during the heyday of the #BlackLivesMatter movement that emerged in Ferguson, Missouri, in
August 2014, and continued through the Charlotte, North Carolina, riot of September 2016.
Who
Had 'Race Riots' on Their Pandemic Bingo Cards? [Scroll down] I've been saying for a while that we were
probably going to find out within the next six months that all of the social-distance and lockdown stuff was [nonsense], but
that all got taken care of this past weekend. Of course, the execrable Enemy of the People media types have been lying
to our faces again, running with a narrative of "cops bad and mostly peaceful protesters" even with so much evidence to the
contrary. There certainly are a lot burning buildings for "mostly peaceful" protests. The most priceless moment
came Friday night [5/29/2020] when MSNBC's Ali Velshi was reassuring everyone that the protests were mostly peaceful while
standing in front of a burning building:
Blaming
White Supremacists For The Riots Is Nonsensical Gaslighting. On Saturday morning [5/30/2020] Minnesota
officials came out with an audacious and absurd explanation for the looting and arson that struck Minneapolis this
week. Apparently it was white supremacists from out of state who pretended to be actual protestors in an attempt to
discredit the protest. The evidence? A vague claim and a lie. It turns out that most of those arrested were
actually Minnesota residents. The hypocritical mental gymnastics from the liberal media in the past 72 hours were
amazing enough to earn a perfect 10 from the stingiest East German judge. First, we watched tens of thousands of people
hold mass gatherings across the country, which just last week we were told would kill everyone, and the media suddenly didn't
care. It's like the Chinese virus just went away by magic.
Media
Completely Misrepresents Trump Tweets About Minneapolis Rioting. In their flailing efforts to blame President
Donald Trump for the actions of a lone police officer in Minneapolis, the mainstream media is once again twisting the
president's words to make it appear as if he made a racist statement, when in fact, the opposite is true. Late Thursday
night [5/28/2020], the president tweeted a message to those who would burn buildings and loot defenseless stores in the wake
of the tragic death of George Floyd in Minneapolis. The tweet was obviously meant as a warning to people who would
destroy a major American city, but the anti-Trump mainstream media and Twitter itself saw it as another opportunity to
portray the president as a racist, despite all evidence to the contrary.
The
Media's Top Lies and Spins About COVID-19. In such uncertain times, Americans can only hope that the media
would follow suit and put aside partisan politics in the face of a global pandemic. Sadly, some journalists and fake
news outlets can't help themselves. The media distorts and misleads, takes statements out of context, treats
assumptions as facts, and in general, seems to want to sow as much rancor and fear as possible. This is irresponsible
journalism in a time when the nation needs just the opposite.
Just
How Exaggerated Is The COVID-19 Death Count? As the "official" tally of COVID-19 deaths tops 100,000 in the
U.S., we keep hearing how that number is likely a low-ball estimate. But there's far more evidence that the death count
has been knowingly exaggerated — possibly by a very wide margin. A recent Seattle Times article pretty much
lays out the charade going on. The headline reads: "Washington state's actual coronavirus death toll may be
higher than current tallies, health officials say." But the story itself leads one to the exact opposite conclusion.
[...] The story goes on to say that the state's dashboard "reflects anyone who died, that tested positive for COVID,
irrespective of cause of death." (Emphasis added.) Basically, the state has been matching up the names of those
who died this year with a database containing names of people who tested positive for COVID-19.
CNN,
MSNBC are peddling panic, moral judgment, not science and data, in coronavirus coverage. We hope you had a
happy Memorial Day weekend. It's possible you have spent, along with millions of others, months trapped indoors per
government order because of the coronavirus. So, getting outside makes all the difference — grilling a
hamburger in the fresh air, hitting the park, walking on the beach for a couple of hours. It's essential. All of
us needed it. Nature is medicine. Happy, balanced people understand that intuitively. You can't just sit on
a couch all day barking at other people on social media. Your soul will rot if you do that. And unfortunately,
it's too late for a lot of people at CNN, and they haven't even been trapped inside for months. For reasons that no one
in authority has ever really explained, cable news yappers have been classified as essential workers from the very first day
of lockdown.
Of
Course COVID-19 Deaths Aren't a 'Trump Death Toll'. Does anyone seriously think that if Donald Trump were not
president, the coronavirus pandemic would have never hit America? The super PAC Democratic Coalition — which
supports presumptive Democratic nominee Joe Biden — apparently does, because it has launched a series of ads
describing deaths from the coronavirus as the "Trump Death Toll."
Trump
is right about the huge potential for ballot fraud in Michigan's election. To hear the mainstream media tell
it, President Trump is somehow paranoid at Michigan's latest gambit to mail absentee voting applications to all registered
voters in the state. Here's the selectively distorted reporting from the Detroit News: [...] They ran it with a
photograph of Trump with a photoshopped color manipulation that exaggerated the color of his skin as well as his blue tie to
colors not consistent with the lighting in the room. [...]
Don't
Buy the Misleading Figures. Here's the Real Story About How the U.S. Matches Up on Coronavirus Deaths.
The sheer ease with which the American left has politicized the deaths of thousands of Americans has shocked even me.
The United States is approaching 100,000 deaths and the left seems determined to make sure the public blames President Donald
Trump for those deaths. As PJM's Tyler O'Neil noted, the Democratic Coalition is trying to make "Trump Death Toll" a
thing. While Tyler effectively demonstrated the absurdity of blaming these deaths on Trump, I'm going to show that
despite the headlines that suggest things in the United States are the worst in the world, that is emphatically not the case.
The Doctrine of Media
Untruth. As a general rule, when the New York Times, the Washington Post, National Public Radio,
Public Broadcasting Service, NBC, CBS, ABC, MSNBC, and CNN begin to parrot a narrative, the truth often is found in simply
believing just the opposite. Put another way, the media's "truth" is a good guide to what is abjectly false.
Perhaps we can call the lesson of this valuable service, the media's inadvertent ability to convey truth by disguising it
with transparent bias and falsehood, the "Doctrine of Media Untruth."
Long-lens dishonesty again: That
picture of Ocean City doesn't show what the scolds say it shows. One particular picture from Ocean City,
Maryland, this weekend seems to show a totally packed boardwalk. This has led to all sorts of scolding. Here's a
Reuters congressional reporter cursing the walkers for lacking the self-control to stay inside and on Twitter, like
responsible folks should do. [Tweet ...] See that sign in the distance that says, "PLAYLAND"? That is south of Worcester
Street. It's 1,100 feet down the boardwalk from the body piercing sign. Tiger Woods's average drive is 285 yards.
If he teed off from where that photographer is standing, Woods would be 80 yards short of Playland.
GQ
Political Reporter Misidentifies George Wallace As Republican To Smear GOP. Wallace Was A Democrat. Laura
Bassett, who also writes as freelance political reporter, wrote a Wednesday op-ed titled "The Anti-Abortion Movement Was
Always Built on Lies," attempting to chronicle evangelical efforts in building up the pro-life movement. The crux of
Bassett's piece rests on the foundation that the pro-life movement was "bought and paid for the Christian right," to morph
the Republican Party into the pro-life party. While explaining the party's historical support for legal abortion,
Bassett used the example of Wallace as a Republican governor whose promotion of abortion was motivated by Republicans' intent
to stop "breeding children as a cash crop," to collect more in government handouts. Only one problem: Wallace was
one of the biggest 20th century stars of the Democratic Party, and by no means a Republican.
If
you want to see a microcosm of our vile American media, this is it. I was looking for articles showing that
those who predicted deadly failure due to Governor Brian Kemp's decision to open Georgia were wrong. I found such an
article at Business Insider, a widely read online news outlet. Diving into the article, though, revealed that it wasn't
reporting the news at all. Instead, it provided a perfect example of how the media shape and distort the news in
service to a Democrat narrative. When Governor Kemp announced three weeks ago that he would start opening up Georgia,
the media had a field day. After all, this was the governor who "stole" the election from Stacey Abrams, a woman
distinguished only by being the worst loser in American gubernatorial history. (Hillary Clinton still holds the record for
being the worst loser ever.) [...] If Michelle Mark, the reporter wanted to be factual, her article would have consisted of
one sentence: "Georgia's Department of Public Health has published data showing what appears to be a significant
decline in new cases and deaths." Instead, the entire, very long article is a series of hypotheticals about how maybe,
possibly, even probably, people will still get sick in Georgia.
WaPo's
new mantra is Just Don't Report. As the walls close in on Obama's use of the FBI to spy on political opponents,
the Washington Post has a simple solution for a press that aided and abetted him: If something looks bad "just don't
report that it does." The full quote by columnist Greg Sargent is, "There is a legitimately difficult editorial challenge in
figuring out how to scrutinize a mostly conventional politician who is running against a bottomlessly corrupt and dishonest
opponent like Trump, as Brian Beutler has noted, without placing a similarly sized question mark over both of them.
"There's just no doubt that this happened in 2016, as has been widely documented. "This is plainly on its way to
happening again. But it doesn't have to. One way to avoid this: If something doesn't actually 'boost' or
'lend fodder' to a big claim that Trump is making, just don't report that it does. "It's simple, but it's a start."
Just don't report.
When
Did the Media Stop Running Corrections? Last week, Vanity Fair had nice little scoop, or so it thought.
Gabriel Sherman, whose title is special correspondent, authored an article premised on a major bit of news —
investors aligned with Donald Trump Jr. had purchased a stake in the pro-Trump, conservative news outlet One America News
Network (OANN). This was news to Charles P. Herring, president of OANN's parent company, who fired off a letter to
Vanity Fair owner Conde Nast demanding a retraction and an apology. "The facts are undisputable and in direct conflict
with your false and defamatory statements," he wrote. "Herring Networks, Inc. has not sold ANY stake in One America
News Network or its company to anyone or any entity, period." Vanity Fair quickly recast Sherman's story without
acknowledging its error: "This post has been updated to include a denial from Blackstone, and to reflect comments
received after publication by Charles P. Herring, president of Herring Networks, OANN's parent company." In sum, Sherman
based his piece on a premise that was wrong, and Vanity Fair merely acted as if all the story needed was a minor update.
How
the 1619 Project Destroys the True Moral Meaning of America. Honest patriots of our great republic are upset at
the recent bestowal of the 2020 Pulitzer Prize for Commentary on Nikole Hannah-Jones and her 1619 Project. As most
readers might already know, the 1619 project was inaugurated with a special issue in the The New York Times Magazine
in August of 2019. Its goal was and remains one of challenging us all to reframe U.S history by marking the year when
the first enslaved Africans arrived in Virginia as our nation's foundational date. The project promulgates the idea
that everything that has made America exceptional literally grew out of slavery. It, therefore, establishes 1619 and
not 1776 as our nation's true founding date. The egregious historical inaccuracies of the project and Hannah-Jones'
claims have been well documented. The most egregious among them which the Times has had to minimally correct,
included claiming that the American Revolution was literally fought to preserve the institution of slavery, and that Abraham
Lincoln opposed the equality of blacks.
Where
is Christine Blasey Ford and why hasn't she said anything about Tara Reade? [Scroll down] Christine
Blasey Ford wasn't whisked away from earth in 2018. She's still out there somewhere reading the news. She knows about
Tara Reade and, so far, she hasn't offered a word of public support about her allegation. That's true even though Tara
Reade made a point of saying she believed Christine Blasey Ford in her interview with Megyn Kelly. Isn't it pretty
remarkable that Ford has remained silent? Has anyone in the media even tried to ask Blasey Ford if she believes
Reade? Did reporters at every news outlet suddenly lose her number after the confirmation? Given the media
comparisons between the two women over the past several weeks, it really does seem like an obvious avenue to pursue.
So why hasn't the media pursued it?
Gowdy
ready to expose reporters who 'aided and abetted' Adam Schiff during Russia investigation. Former federal
prosecutor Trey Gowdy says voting out Democratic California Rep. Adam Schiff is not enough punishment for the damage he
has done to President Trump and the intelligence community. During a Friday night [5/8/2020] appearance on
Hannity, Gowdy told the Fox News host he also wants reporters who advanced the fake Russian collusion story to be
named publicly and that he's willing to do it. "The media, not only did they not provide scrutiny over Adam Schiff,
they aided and abetted him," Gowdy said. "Politico, the Hill, Washington Post, New York Times,
I'll come on and even give you the reporters' names sometimes. The reporters who sat there and helped Adam Schiff
perpetrate this fraud, next time I'm with you I'll give you the names of the reporters."
Video
Allegedly Shows That Once The Cameras Are Off Reporters Remove Their Masks And Don't Follow Social Distancing
Rules. Americans are skeptical of the news media. A recent Gallup Poll shows that 55% of Americans
disapprove of the way the media have handled the coronavirus coverage — that's a higher disapproval rating than
Congress, which is saying a lot. And the public's response to the coronavirus pandemic reveals its distrust.
And we can now tell why Americans don't trust the mainstream media.
The
Eight Worst 'Fake News' Stories of the Trump Years. Journalists bristle when President Trump criticizes them as
"fake news," and they complain that such criticism erodes the public's faith in the news media as an independent watchdog on
the powerful. But Trump's critiques wouldn't have nearly as much impact if news organizations actually acted like
careful, professional, independent purveyors of fact. Instead, they too often behave as sloppy partisans, carelessly
jumping on one false story after another if they think it will prove their larger narrative that the President is unfit for
office. Sometimes, the "fake news" is about a small detail that suggests a broader pattern: the Time magazine pool
reporter who wrongly claimed on Twitter that Trump had removed a bust of Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr., from the Oval
Office, perhaps hinting at a racial animus. In fact, the bust was right there, obscured from view by a Secret Service
agent and a door.
Controversial
Photo of 'Crowds' on CA Beach Was Shot with a Telephoto Lens. A photo showing crowds packing a beach in
California during the state's COVID-19 lockdown sparked controversy this past week and led to the area's beaches getting shut
down. Now that photo itself is at the center of a heated debate: many are saying that it's misleading because it
was shot with a telephoto lens.
C-SPAN
posting inaccurate transcripts of Trump briefings. C-SPAN is publishing inaccurate transcripts of President
Donald Trump's remarks during the vitally important national coronavirus task force daily briefings. Yes, really.
So Trump is being falsely attacked for what Trump never said (again). The worst of it, lately, is Trump asking questions to
scientists. Those questions have been transformed into statements that Trump never made. But as I endeavored to
clear up the fog, I was shocked to discover that C-SPAN's textual transcript are the source of the confusion. The
quotes that Trump haters are throwing around happen to be accurate reports of the inaccurate C-SPAN transcript.
The
Hypocrisy on Tara Reade Is a National Disgrace. We do not know whether the accusations that Tara Reade has
leveled against Joe Biden are true or false. That is a question of evidence and of inquiry that might be answered as
time rolls on. We do know, by contrast, that the double standard that has been exhibited by Biden's campaign and by the
political press in tandem is a national disgrace. Both culturally and legally, due process must be habitually applied
to nobody or to everyone. If, upon the most frivolous and protean of pretexts, it is routinely accorded to one faction
while being denied to another, it is effectively lost.
Jake
Tapper and Chuck Todd Deliberately Lie to Viewers While Questioning Dr. Deborah Birx. David Mamet had a
famous saying that is often cited. Essentially he said: 'in order for left-wing partisans and ideologues to
continue advancing their agenda, they must pretend not to know things.' CTH calls this "The Mamet Principle." No
where is that quote more clearly showcased than with two media interviews of Dr. Deborah Birx today [4/27/2020].
CNN's Jake Tapper and NBC's Chuck Todd both pretend not to know the guidelines and gateways for a phase-one reopening of the
U.S. economy. Both pundits fabricate information purposefully and with specific intent.
Reporter
Compared Coronavirus Deaths To Vietnam To Rip Trump. But During Vietnam, Another Virus Killed More Americans Than The
War. On Monday, a reporter from New York Magazine asked President Trump whether he deserved to be reelected,
since more Americans had died from the coronavirus than died in the war in Vietnam. She may have been unaware that at
the height of the Vietnam war, there was something that killed more Americans than the war did, and it was a similar
virus — and no one questioned whether a president should be elected or not because of the virus, known as the Hong
Kong Flu. In 1968-69, the Hong Kong flu ravaged the world; it wound up killing more than one million people worldwide,
over 100,000 of them in the United States. No lockdowns were imposed and people still went to work, albeit lessening
bus travel and implementing social distancing and more washing of their hands.
Disinfecting the Left-Wing Media.
As well as President Trump has done in those daily press briefings discussing the federal government's fight against the
Wuhan ChiCom virus, it might be time to put those to bed. The reason? He's beaten the Democrat activists in the
White House press corps to a pulp, he's destroyed their credibility, and he's captured as much of the confidence of the
American people as he can in those press conferences. And at this point the Dem activists are simply going to report
what they want to report, the facts and reality [notwithstanding]. Trump has noticed that, skipping the briefing on
Saturday and expressing frustration with the media's refusal to offer anything like responsible journalism on the virus.
Virus
Strikes Media Dumb. There's a lot of important news this week which is getting insufficient coverage. [...]
Instead, we are back to story number one: How to refashion news on the Wuhan virus to attack the President. As
been the case from the beginning, the press is using every foul means to demean him and make this the Trump Virus, ignoring
his measured approach and successes. This week they glommed onto his remarks in a presser that revealed the contagion
curve is flattening and diminishing to suggest that Trump had called for something as possible remediation —
bleach injection — that he had not. In some cases, they flat-out lied about what he said. In others
they edited the presser video to achieve the same distortion. Regular readers of this site know a great deal about
press information manipulation and lies. I write this in the hope that you will share it with those others who still
don't get it.
How
the N.Y. Times Swung at Fox News, and Missed. Not content to accuse Donald Trump of killing Americans with his
incompetence during the coronavirus pandemic, Democrats and their allies in the media have turned their fire on the
president's supporters as well. Those with "blood on their hands," to use the smear du jour, range from Republican
governors reluctant to issue quarantine orders to Michigan autoworkers protesting being locked out their jobs.
Fake
News: Trump Didn't Tell People to Inject Bleach or Lysol Into Their Veins to Fight Coronavirus. On
Thursday, liberals thought they finally had the smoking gun, the excuse to oust President Donald Trump as mentally unfit for
office. Some called him "President bleach," claiming he had suggested people should inject bleach or Lysol into their
veins to fight the coronavirus. [...] Then the commentary. "Trump unquestionably is unfit to serve as president.
He endangers every American. Most directly, he endangers his supporters, many of whom either believe the virus is a
hoax (prompting them to engage in dangerous behavior) or now that injecting/ingesting disinfectants is in order," tweeted
MSNBC legal analyst Glenn Kirschner. [...] Trump wasn't telling people to drink or inject bleach — he was asking
whether or not it would be possible to clean inside the body with a similar disinfectant. He also insisted, "you're
going to have to use medical doctors with" any such practice. In other words, "don't try this at home, kids."
Remember
the government shutdowns? Funny how we don't see those same sob stories about lost paychecks now.
Whenever the threat of a government shutdown looms, Democrats and their media allies give us daily doses of how devastating
such a thing will be on 'non-essential' government workers. Then they go into overdrive when a shutdown actually
occurs: Wall-to-wall sob stories giving examples of government workers supposedly harmed even though, everyone knows,
those employees will soon be paid. They essentially have a paid vacation. Now, after weeks of the intentional
destruction of the private sector with tens of millions of jobs lost, with businesses and families being devasted and having
no idea how they will feed their families and themselves, there are few of those same sob stories, despite real hardship, and
here is what we get instead: If a Republican governor wants to open a state's businesses, we get attack pieces saying
he wants people to die.
Journalists
are a gullible bunch on COVID-19. We are told that a large number of people have the virus of whom we don't
know, including people without symptoms, and that a large number of people who never were diagnosed with the disease and
never had symptoms now might be immune to the disease. We are told that in order to reopen the economy safely, we need
to test everyone to see if he has it, even people without symptoms, and also to test people to see if they are immune so the
government can release those to work. Then we are told that if we find someone who currently has the disease, we need
to find everyone he has been within six feet of for fifteen minutes in the past two weeks and then put all of those people
under house arrest for two weeks. Then we are told that until we get a vaccine, which may be a year or never, we must
practice social distancing, wear masks, and never gather in groups of more than ten, or else huge numbers of people will
die. Now, this sounds to me as though they would rather see the economy destroyed and the U.S. collapse than allow
people the freedom to work, save their businesses, and feed their families.
The Cult That
Rewrites History: Part 1. On Monday April 13th, at the daily presidential briefing held by the President
of the United States, Donald J. Trump, took a most interesting turn. During the first half hour of that briefing, Trump
and his CCP Virus emergency response team took more than a month and a half of carefully constructed lies that Democrats and
the DNC Media Complex have been using to relentlessly attack him, turned the tables, and utterly destroyed them. The
President did this by simply playing a video for the reporters present, and the entire country watching on
television. What this brief video clip did, is establish the correct timeline showing who was doing and saying
what and when they were doing and saying those things. Trump's masterful use of that video during the daily national
emergency briefing absolutely destroyed the Democrats and Fake News Media's talking point that he ignored/didn't do anything
in the early days of the pandemic.
1984
Comes to Life: The Cult That Rewrites History — Part Two. It's probable that every single
reporter that reacted emotionally to the video President Trump played at the briefing came out of that Cultural Marxist
academic system. They have likely spent decades of their lives training their minds to enthusiastically love
whatever Big Brother is giving to them to say today, and memory-holing the past. That's why you notice them reacting so
emotionally to the video presentation. They can't hide it, and they are certainly not faking it. It hit
them right where they live. Right in the center of their own self-image. He took their power away
from them. Let me tell you something: you wind these people on a very deep and personal level when you
will not let them have their precious memory hole. You injure them when you do not let them rewrite the
history they are so desperate to rewrite. And especially so, when it is imperative for their politics that the
public either not know, or quickly forget something. You are taking away their power and they know this.
Don't
Get Fooled by Fake Photos of Coronavirus Lockdown Protests. As a series of demonstrations against COVID-19
lockdown orders sweep the U.S., protesters have shown wildly varying degrees of responsibility and realism. Some have
been staying 6 feet from others or even protesting from within cars, while simply asking for some shutdown leeway for local
businesses and entrepreneurs who are willing to take extra steps to keep pandemic-times customers safe. Alas, others
have been crowding up against each other in large numbers — without masks or any other precautions —
while suggesting that the entire coronavirus outbreak might be a hoax. Some folks online have started spreading rumors
that protesters are paid "crisis actors" — alleging their signs too well-made or similar and that their websites
have fishy origins. [...] On the flip side, people's revulsion at the more reckless or bratty elements of these protests is
setting up social media for a round of fake protest news.
Now
It's Obvious: The Political Class and the Media Are Spinning Tales. At the outset of the coronavirus
lockdowns my colleague Pete Earle penned a prescient article about the propensity of political actors to rewrite the history
of the unfolding crisis in real time. [...] Sadly but not unexpectedly, this real-time revisionism has only accelerated in
the last month. We've now reached a point where reporters, public officeholders, and federal bureaucrats are now
revising their own words and actions from only a few weeks prior — all while hoping that nobody will notice.
The latest example involves the unfolding controversy over President Donald Trump's assertion of authority to set a national
timeline for the repeal of the ongoing economic lockdown, presumably superseding state governors and local officials who
refuse. [...] While the press today fumes in outrage at Trump's newly claimed power, only 10 days ago many of these same
news outlets were clamoring for the very same national lockdown that Trump demurred. Just two weeks ago reporters peppered
Trump with questions about his failure to impose a national shelter in place order.
Why
Has the Voice of America Become a Voice of Confusion? President Trump startled Washington last week by
launching an attack on Voice of America, which for 80 years has been charged with presenting and explaining American values
and policy abroad. Trump called it a "disgrace" that the current VOA leadership was allowing its service to repeat
Chinese talking points on the COVID-19 virus. A White House statement also took issue with the news agency that called
Chinese efforts in Wuhan to contain the virus a "model" for other nations. The statement also noted that VOA relied on
unverified (and subsequently proven false) Chinese-government statistics in some reporting.
Our Garbage Media.
The mendacity and mediocrity of our major news media have seldom been on display more clearly than during the COVID-19
crisis. While the media pretend to be "objective" and are now clearly on the side of the Democrats' narrative that
Trump was negligent and slow in responding to the virus, there is plenty of evidence of the media downplaying the threat of
the virus and criticizing Trump's early moves, especially his China travel ban, which the media decried as "xenophobic." And
then there is the media's lack of interest in the Tara Reade allegation about Joe Biden, which is so blatant that even
Alexandria Ocasio Cortez gets it.
A
free nation cannot long survive if its press takes sides. On March 16, the New York Times' Mara Gay posted a
stunningly dishonest tweet about President Trump's conversation with state governors concerning medical equipment needed to
treat coronavirus patients: [Tweet] Gay lied in saying Trump told governors they are on their own, thus
misleading readers to think he refused to provide the governors with federal funds for critical medical equipment.
Below is what Trump actually said — the part in boldface is what Gay selectively quoted, everything else is what
she maliciously omitted: "We will be backing you, but try getting it yourselves. Point of sales, much
better, much more direct if you can get it yourself." [...] What Gay did was journalistic malpractice at its most evil, a
fake news political hatchet job against a president she hates in hopes of torpedoing his re-election. Mara Gay is no
rookie reporter who made an innocent mistake. She's a member of the New York Times Editorial Board. Her
dissembling brand of destroy-Trump journalism has been practiced non-stop for nearly four years by virtually the entire
mainstream media.
Photo
of same boy faked to claim "youngest UK coronavirus death". His photo has been widely shared on social media
claiming he is a 13-year old who died of coronavirus in Great Britain. A post on Facebook claimed he was a
"schoolboy... with no health conditions" who became "UK's youngest coronavirus victim." The post went on to read:
"Ismail Mohamed Abdulwahab, from Brixton, sadly died without any family members close by due to the highly infectious nature
of Covid-19." But it isn't true. The same photograph of the same boy has circulated in news stories about deaths as
far back as 2017.
Trump
Exposes Phony Journalists with Video Montage. [Scroll down] But he had to do that yesterday, folks. And it was
great because it was nothing but their words. It was nothing but video clips of the media themselves lying and getting things wrong
and purposely distorting things. He just zapped 'em. I mean, just exposed them to the world. This is the kind of
thing that needs to happen constantly. The American people who aren't aware need to be made aware what the media is. [...] And
while their job title category might be journalists, this is not what they are practicing. What they are practicing is opposition.
Whatever Trump is for, they guaranteed to be against it. Whatever Trump is against, they are guaranteed to be for it. Why are
they for or against anything? They are media. Their pretense is that they are objective and fair and all of that. It
isn't the case.
Brutal
Trump-de-Force at the Coronavirus Hearing Leaves Media Screaming 'Pull the Plug!' Donald Trump absolutely lit
up his own Coronavirus Task Force press briefing with a more than six-minute, tour-de-force media takedown that had CNN and
MSNBC sputtering and reaching for the plug. Trump said hello and turned the media briefing over to the NIH's
Dr. Anthony Fauci to clarify his words uttered on CNN on shutting down the country earlier to prevent more deaths.
Then, Trump took over and it was ON. He listed the timeline of his response to the coronavirus and presented a video of
incorrect statements by the press on COVID-19.
Facebook's
Fact-Checkers Have Failed To Fact-Check HuffPo's Anti-Trump Coronavirus Disinformation. It will come as no
surprise to Breitbart News readers that Facebook's vaunted fact-checking system does not stop, or even appropriately label,
fake, misleading claims from the left-wing media about President Donald Trump. A story from Verizon-owned HuffPost
claims that the president has a stake in a drug company that produces hydroxycholoroquine, the drug being promoted by himself
and many in the administration as a potential treatment for the Chinese virus. The article is currently on Facebook
without any labels alerting users that the information is false or even just misleading.
New
York's Mass Graves Are Complete Propaganda: The Video Is From Potter's Field Where 25 People Are Buried In A Week In Normal
Times. New York City officials have hired contract laborers to bury the dead in its potter's field on Hart
Island. Images have emerged of coffins being buried in a "mass grave" in New York City. This has caused for
TrumpBurialPits to be the number one topic that's trending on the internet. However, Trump Burial Pits is complete
propaganda. These images shown are of Potter's Field where 24 people are buried a day in normal times. Do you
really think we're burying thousands in some ditch on an Island in New York? People don't want there loved ones to have
a proper burial? The city has also shortened the amount of time it will hold unclaimed remains before they are buried
in the city's public cemetery. Under the new policy, the numbers of daily burials should increase even in normal times,
the medical examiner's office will keep bodies in storage for just 14 days before they're buried in the city's potter's
field on Hart Island. Workers in hazmat outfits were seen stacking wooden coffins in deep trenches in Hart Island.
Racial
warrior offended when the Surgeon General tells minorities that behavior affects virus risks. PBS's Yamiche
Alcindor has distinguished herself as one of the media figures most engaged in the "gotcha" game at COVID-19 press
conferences, especially when she can work race into the issue. On Friday, after the Surgeon General made a direct plea
to minorities about behaviors that can protect them, she went on the attack. U.S. Surgeon General Dr. Jerome Adams
spent five minutes during Friday's press conference talking about the fact that COVID-19 is hitting minority communities
especially hard. His densely packed presentation began with his addressing minorities' predisposition to diseases that
increase the risk from COVID-19, such as asthma, heart disease, and diabetes. [...] PBS's Yamiche Alcindor was among the
assembled reporters. Having heard the entire presentation, she didn't ask a question that would help anyone understand
substantive issues. Instead, she went for the "gotcha" questions: [...]
The
AP begins revising history to attack Trump. The media are not only rude and confrontational at press briefings,
but they're also re-writing history about how and when information on the virus came to light. Facts don't
matter. There is only one goal: Get Trump. Toward that end, manipulating timelines has become quite popular
as evidenced most recently in this AP report: [...] China lied, caused a global pandemic, and created circumstances in
country after country that would make it more difficult to control due to lack of medical supplies. WHO lied. And
our own experts seem to have been blindsided. Along the way, time was squandered by the CDC, not the president.
American
media keep repeating China's coronavirus talking points. It should not be this easy for Chinese Communist Party
propaganda to make its way into major American newsrooms. Since the outbreak of the coronavirus, which Chinese lies
ensured would become a pandemic, American news media have promoted a number of Beijing-approved talking points, including the
one that alleges it is racist to refer to the virus by its country and city of origin. American news media have also
accepted at face value a series of dubious claims pushed by Chinese Communist apparatchiks, including the absurd boast that
China's new case numbers have remained essentially flat since late February. "U.S. has more known cases of coronavirus
than any other country," CNN reported on March 26, its declaration coming in unison with nearly every major news outlet in
the United States. [...] That is, the U.S. is "No. 1" only if you believe the numbers reported by China, which you should
not. Pandemic trackers work with the data provided, and the data provided by Beijing is unbelievable.
The
Corporate Media's Coronavirus Propaganda For China Is Finally Catching Up With Them. Beijing has lied about the
coronavirus from the start, while here in the West our corporate media has actively and enthusiastically spread its lies to
households across the free world. But now that news of China's lies is beginning to seep out, will it make a
difference? Will there even be corrections? Don't count on it. Even before reports on incinerators "working
around the clock," massive orders for urns, government bribes to keep mourners quiet, and total government censorship,
China's lies were obvious. Even before China concealed the outbreak, blamed the U.S. military, and expelled foreign
reporters, their lies were obvious. Their lies were so obvious because China is an authoritarian regime that history
plainly documents killing and starving millions while lying about it to this day. The press should know this, and they
do know this, yet still corporate news outlets unquestioningly repeat Beijing's line.
Dr.
Birx Finally Goes Right at the U.S. Media and China for Lying. This has been a long time coming. I
understand the notion that figures like Dr. Deborah Birx should remain apolitical, and they should, but it's not
"political" to tell the truth about China lying and the U.S. media choosing to play useful idiots in response. During
yesterday's [3/31/2020] presser, Dr. Birx finally took the gloves off and said what we've all been thinking. These
ridiculous graphs relying on Chinese data that media members are sharing are garbage and dangerous.
Who's
Funding the Coronavirus Political Trolls? [Scroll down] Pacronym's Facebook digital disinformation
campaign targets Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, North Carolina and Arizona, the same five states targeted by McGowan's
Courier plot to create fake local news sites. Coronavirus cases have sharply risen in Michigan and Pennsylvania, but
McGowan is sticking to her plan to help elect Joe Biden by spreading uncertainty during a time when people need
reassurance. Americans need to know that they can trust the health advisories coming from the White House. It's
not a time to sow doubt and division. But Democrat political operatives have decided that it's their moment.
Media
Peddle Bogus Wuhan Virus Stats To Bash America. When Donald Trump tweeted this week that the United States had
performed more coronavirus tests than any other country, the media were upset. Trump being Trump, he'd also said the
United States had done more tests in eight days than South Korea had done in eight weeks. PolitiFact calculated the
United States had done 17,582 fewer tests than South Korea during that time period. LiveScience said the United States
had done 43,790 fewer tests than South Korea during that time period. Their own disparity notwithstanding, other media
outlets pointed out merely that South Korea is a much smaller country than the United States. That meant they had done
more tests per capita than the United States had.
What
the Media Isn't Telling You About the United States' Coronavirus Case Numbers. On Thursday [3/26/2020], the
New York Times made a big fuss over the fact that more than 81,321 Americans have been infected with the coronavirus,
which is "more cases than China, Italy or any other country has seen." According to their report, the United States,
following "a series of missteps," is now "the epicenter of the pandemic." But, is it really? China's confirmed cases
topped out at around 80,000, but, as PJM's Victoria Taft noted, China reportedly stopped conducting tests in order to show
the world they've contained the spread of the virus. So, comparing any country to China at this point is useless.
The
New York Times Tries to Spread Panic About Ventilators, Gets Fact-Checked. The New York Times has been one of
the worst news outlets during the Wuhan virus pandemic. They've consistently taken partisan positions and purposely
mislead the public. For example, after Nancy Pelosi tried to blowup the latest relief package, the Times decided to say
it was the fault of Republicans — who had previously negotiated the bill in a bipartisan manner —
because of course they did. Today [3/26/2020], the paper of record went back to the old steadfast during this crisis,
which is to try to create panic in order to score political points.
'Economist'
Runs Chinese Coronavirus Propaganda Disguised as News. The Economist is running Chinese propaganda from
an outlet that is violating U.S. law to spread the message that Chinese president Xi Jinping has done a masterful job
handling the coronavirus pandemic. The propaganda advertorials, which are ads designed to look like news stories, come
from the Beijing Review, an entity backed by the Chinese Communist Party. The outlet has never registered with
the Department of Justice as required by the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) and does not include a legally required
disclaimer that the ad is being pushed by a foreign nation.
How
the Mainstream Media Sweep Their Mistakes Under the Rug. The online news outlet Axios on Wednesday
[3/18/2020] published a bombshell news story: Bernie Sanders, reporter Alexi McCammond wrote, was suspending his
presidential campaign. "It's an end to the campaign of the leading progressive in the race — and the
candidate who seemed to be the clear front-runner for the Democratic nomination less than a month ago," the report
stated. The only problem: It wasn't true. And this wasn't a run-of-the mill error, but a miscue on arguably
the most anticipated (and inevitable) political story in the country. What followed from Axios was not an
explanation to its readers of how it got the story wrong, but an excuse for how it was mistakenly published (Axios editor in
chief Nicholas Johnston blamed process breakdown in a "fully remote" newsroom). Axios's response was an exercise
in obfuscation and blame shifting.
The Liberal Media's
Credibility Crashes. Working hand-in-hand with their Democrat allies, the first cry of "Wolf!" was the
Trump-Russia collusion fairy tale. It was a ridiculous story on the face of it. His media antagonists might hate
the guy, but to believe he was stupid enough to try and steal the presidency with help from Vladimir Putin was bizarre beyond
belief. Finally the long-awaited (by the LSM) Mueller report was issued, followed by Mueller's appalling performance at
a congressional hearing, in which he appeared to not know what was in his own report. There was no collusion to be
found. Shocking — not. The result for the Trump-Russia collusion media? Here was this report
from right here at the Daily Caller, Maddow's ratings were down 17%.
When
Wuhan Virus Departs, World Will Be Changed. [Scroll down] Hardest hit of all, however, is the media,
whose anti-Trump mania, reliance on manipulative if not imaginary "anonymous sources," eagerness to be seduced by former
members of the intelligence community, general ignorance of almost every specialized field they encounter, political
naiveté, and absolute fidelity to the party line ("Wuhan" is now racist) has rendered a once-proud profession little
more than a mouthpiece for the Democratic National Committee and a constant reproach to truth, justice, and the American
way. At a time of dying newspapers and laid-off reporters, the media has chosen to go down with its "principles,"
rather than adhering to its former standards of objectivity and professionalism. They wanted "change" and now they've
got it[.]
The
American press's entire energy is bent towards destroying Trump. The mainstream American media have abandoned
journalism's formerly-prized ethos of "who, what, where, why, when." There is no pretense anymore that they serve a purpose
other than maligning Donald Trump in the hope of destroying his presidency. [...] The media are currently outraged that
Republicans are less panicked by the coronavirus than Democrats are. Part of that may be because Democrats are ruled
more by emotion than by reason. A lot of it, though, is because Republicans have no reason to trust the media. If
members of the media believe that saying something will hurt Trump, they'll say it — and that's true whether what
they're saying is honest or not. If the media hysterically use coronavirus to attack Trump, Republicans instinctively
assume (a) that coronavirus isn't that bad and (b) that Trump's doing an excellent job of handling it.
The
Media Succumb to Raging Case of Katrina Virus in Hopes of Infecting Trump. Democrats in the news media say that
President George W. Bush botched the response to Hurricane Katrina in 2005. To the extent that Bush could convince the mayor
of New Orleans and the governor of Louisiana to declare an emergency and order mandatory evacuations, then, sure, it was all
his fault. Sigh. Bush was mocked for using the FEMA trailers for emergency housing after the storm, even though
they're often used for that purpose all over the country. He was blamed for failing to put all of the first responders
in the direct path of the storm, instead of where they were stationed, just outside of the area to keep them safe until the
storm passed but close enough to swarm the area. He was blamed for the levee failures. He was blamed for people
staying in the 9th Ward when the storm surge flooded them out. Brian Williams pretended to see "bodies floating" in the French
Quarter (a lie). Wolf Blitzer incited a racist narrative, calling the victims "so poor, so black." Kanye West declared
that "George Bush doesn't care about black people." Babies were being "raped" in the Superdome. On and on it went.
How
a Soros Trojan Horse Took Down Chris Matthews and Is Poised to Bully Others into Submission. With hundreds of
millions of dollars from billionaire financier George Soros and dozens of his comrades-in-arms at the "Democracy Alliance,"
the progressive network of labor unions, activist investment firms, social justice organizations, and ideological media
outlets is the tip of the spear in "cancel" culture. [...] These groups and outlets, working in concert, orchestrated the
downfall of Fox News host Bill O'Reilly, targeted Breitbart, and attempted to knock Laura Ingraham off the air through
advertiser boycotts. Ultraviolet, in particular, led the anti-Kavanaugh protests — projecting "Kavanaugh is
a sexual predator" onto the D.C. Court of Appeals where he sat before joining the highest court, running TV ads, and having
their paid staff confront then-Senator Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) in a Senate elevator to convince him to oppose Kavanaugh.
Armed with unending funds from the Democracy Alliance donors, Ultraviolet's press releases are often re-packaged and
published as "news" by Huffington Post writers, including Bassett. Bassett also received awards from the neo-Malthusian
and Democracy Alliance-funded Population Institute and Planned Parenthood for her pro-abortion reporting.
Stone
Sentencing Ends Russia Collusion, Part I. The Roger Stone sentencing farce is as fitting an end to the Russia
Collusion saga as one could conjure up ... though it might be more fitting to call it the end of Russia Collusion, Part I.
No sooner did the first flick conclusively bomb than the media-Democrat complex was issuing the casting call for Russia Collusion,
Part II. In the sequel, you're asked to believe that Putin is manipulating the chesspieces to steal a second term for
President Trump — somehow preferring an incumbent who beefs up the U.S. armed forces, pressures NATO allies to beef up
theirs, imposes painful sanctions on Moscow, provides lethal aid to Ukraine, ramps up U.S. energy production, and seeks to thwart the
Kremlin's coveted natural-gas partnership with Germany, over an unabashed socialist who honeymooned in the Soviet Union and whose
policies would wreck the American economy, end the resurgence of American energy production, and hollow out the American armed
forces. It's a lunatic plot.
The
Washington Post (CIA) is Very Worried About The Big Russia Lie Being Exposed. The media PR firm for the FBI and
DOJ objectives is the New York Times. The media PR firm for the State Department is CNN. The media PR firm for the
CIA is The Washington Post. This pattern has existed for several years. The Washington Post is very concerned
about a growing possibility the investigation into the origin of intelligence community work may expose the fraudulent nature
of the entire 'Russian Election Interference Collusion-Conspiracy' narrative. Very concerned. The WaPo/CIA
express concern by stating that President Trump is attempting to "rewrite history"; disingenuously skipping the part where
Trump isn't attempting anything. For more than three years President Trump has simply pointed out the obvious. It
is is the media and the intelligence apparatus that set up a fictitious narrative for political needs.
Trump
Slams Media Over 'Fake News' Border Wall Report. Ahead of making his crowd-thrilling appearance at the Daytona
500 Sunday, President Trump added one more media-slamming post to a series of tweets he'd issued over the weekend hammering
one of the central promises of his 2016 election: that he would "build the wall." "Last week the Fake News said that a
section of our powerful, under construction, Southern Border Wall 'fell over', trying to make it sound terrible, except
the reason was that the concrete foundation was just poured [and] soaking wet when big winds kicked in. Quickly fixed
'forever'," the president wrote Sunday [2/16/2020].
It
was Obama, not Trump, who weaponized government against political opponents. The media frequently buries
stories that might hurt political candidates or policies they support and will continually run false stories against
political candidates and policies they oppose. How else can it explain the years of fake stories on Russian collusion,
seeking to destroy white Christian boys for wearing MAGA hats, trying to destroy Supreme Court Justice nominee Brett
Kavanaugh with no evidence, the false "Hands up, don't shoot" narrative? How else do you explain the burying of stories
about all the mental and sexual abuse of women by the Clintons and the burying of stories or the lack of investigation into
the clear corruption and kickbacks of the Clintons and Bidens if not pure bias? How many people are the media willing
to destroy in order to get power back for the Democrats?
Four
major journalistic errors in just 10 hours. The New York Times's Maggie Haberman, for example, tweeted
the following falsehood at around 5:30 p.m. Monday evening: "Republican voter registration in NH is down roughly
20k voters from 2016 to now. It's a reminder that Trump's increased GOP popularity is in part because in some places,
the GOP registration rolls have shrunk." This is not only false, but it has been debunked several times. At some
point, repeating the lie becomes a choice. Earlier than that, MSNBC's Katy Tur, who hosts a politics news show, sought
to throw cold water on the strong economic numbers touted by the Trump White House, arguing that the economy is not working
for the individual who spends up to 360 months paying off his car loan. [...] Car loans can take anywhere between
12 and 84 months to pay off. Who are these people agreeing to 30-year car loans?
Fake news: Pentagon
racks up $35 trillion in accounting changes in a year. The Pentagon made $35 trillion in
accounting adjustments last year alone — a total that's larger than the entire U.S. economy and underscores the
Defense Department's continuing difficulty in balancing its books.
Rebuttal / clarification: What
Do You Mean You Need to Move 35 Trillion (with a "T") Dollars at the Pentagon? In an article from MSM, Tony
Capaccio at Bloomberg (note — this is Bloomberg reporting in an election year where Michael Bloomberg is prepared
to spend billions to defeat our President), wrote a story about the "stark increase in accounting changes at the Pentagon",
changes of 35 Trillion in 2019, 30.7 trillion in 2018, and 29 Trillion in 2017. Note the phrase "accounting
changes". Tony Capaccio, to make this a bigger story and imply wrongdoing, using all the MSM approved salacious adjectives,
interviews the GAO about the "problem" of the increase in accounting changes. Note, we're supposed to be concerned about an
increase in accounting entries but NO ONE said any money is missing. Plus, remember, GAO is an arm of CONGRESS (read as
Pelosi), and the Pentagon in the Executive Branch (read as Trump).
Fact-Checkers
Have Become the Janissaries of the Obama Legacy. For me, at least, the most grating aspect of contemporary
"fact-checking" isn't the dubious journalistic nature of the project, or the endlessly nitpicking of every Republican
utterance, whether it's particularly misleading or not. It's the increasingly popular effort to try to credit Barack
Obama for everything good that's happened during Donald Trump's presidency.
The Editor says...
I hope you remember that Barack H. Obama, with the eager support of the news media, blamed George W. Bush for
every bad thing that happened in Obama's entire eight-year presidency.
Media
Continues Dishonesty On Dershowitz's Argument Against Impeachment. Last week when it was announced that Alan
Dershowitz was joining President Trump's legal team, I warned in these pages that his complex argument in the alternative, in
which he claims that even if proven what Democrats allege regarding Ukraine does not rise to the level of impeachment, was
ripe for mischaracterization. The news media has not disappointed on that score. The first misunderstanding came
just hours after the announcement of his role. Many in the news media erroneously claimed that Dershowitz, and by
extension Trump's legal team, were conceding wrongdoing, and that Republicans were moving the goalposts away from a "perfect
call." This was never true, but was too attractive a narrative for many to pass up. Yesterday [1/29/2020] the deceptive
coverage of Dershowitz got even worse.
Media
ignore Adam Schiff's record of lying, fawn over him as hero of impeachment proceedings. Democratic Congressman
Adam Schiff of California showed himself to be a liar during the special counsel's investigation of Russian interference in
the 2016 election, repeatedly claiming to have knowledge of "direct" and "ample" evidence proving President Trump's campaign
colluded with the Kremlin. Yet despite outing himself as an untrustworthy partisan operative, many of the same members
of the press who uncritically parroted Schiff and members the intelligence community during the collusion and FBI spying
episodes are promoting the congressman now as a heroic and awe-inspiring manager of the impeachment proceedings; because we
have learned nothing from the last three years.
This
is why nobody cares about the impeachment trial. Does there exist a more unabashed partisan than Adam Schiff?
[...] Over and over again Schiff repeats things about the president that are, to the objective observer, not criminal, not
impeachable, and driven by contempt. You don't have to be a die-hard Trump homer to see that Democrats do not have the
impeachment goods they said they had, and they knew from the get-go that this was going nowhere in the Senate, so they set
out to stage a production, a spectacle to tarnish the president and the GOP while signaling their own virtue. This is
clear, even to ordinary Americans like myself. Yet the liberal media, with its high level of self-importance and low
level of self-awareness, acts like each boring, fanciful, inconsequential monologue is the newest iteration of the "I Have a
Dream" speech.
Fake
News: No, a Christian School Didn't Expel a Girl Over a Rainbow Cake. Last week, liberal media outlets
latched onto the latest horrific example of bigoted Christians forcing their morality on everyone else: a Christian school
expelling a girl for posting a picture of herself wearing a rainbow sweatshirt and eating a rainbow cake on Facebook.
According to the girl's mother, the Christian school rushed to judgment and expelled her daughter, who isn't even gay, over a
birthday cake! This narrative, which plays into the biases of many liberal journalists and LGBT activists, is just as
wrong as the narrative of Covington Catholic teen Nick Sandmann disrespecting a Native American man. As it turns out,
the school had good reason to expel the girl — and it involved a great deal more than one innocent birthday cake.
On the other hand... China's
coronavirus outbreak looks worse than the Chicoms are admitting. Communist regimes are famous for concealing
inconvenient information and that appears to be the case in China with the spread of the coronavirus, a SARS-linked
pneumonia-like flu that reportedly has killed 26, infected nearly a thousand, and spread to to more than a half a dozen
countries beyond China, including the U.S. The Chinese have got 20 million people on lockdown in Wuhan and several cities
near it, just as the Chinese New Year begins, which is the entire region's biggest holiday. It's pretty obvious the
epidemic is spreading anyway. Officials, culpably or not, closed the barn door after the horse got out.
GOP
senators: don't overthink impeachment scam. "Journalists" on TV and radio lie routinely, without a
conscience. They vote Democrat. They love their party. They have to pay. The news media have
exacerbated the impeachment scam. And apparent #NeverTrump GOP senators have believed the news media lies.
Media,
Using Anonymous Sources, Have Presented 4 Separate Narratives Surrounding Trump And Soleimani. When and how did
President Donald Trump come up with the decision to have Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani killed? That's the question
the media seems to have been asking for the past week — and so far, they've come up with wildly different
answers. Using the oh-so-tired "anonymous sources" trick, media outlets have reported everything from Trump wanted
Soleimani dead back in 2017 to suggesting it was actually Secretary of State Mike Pompeo who pushed for the killing.
Here are the four completely contradictory narratives the media have "reported," all based on anonymous officials: [...]
Photographer
Mark Peterson Shows Patriots Can't Trust The Lying Press. I must admit I was surprised that the Main Stream
Media responded to the emergent internet's ability to debunk its propaganda (Duke Lacrosse, UVA Rape Hoax, Covington
Catholic) by becoming even more flagrantly partisan (besides, of course, calling for internet censorship). Aren't markets
supposed to clear? But the result is that the myth of journalism as an impartial profession, which was receiving pious
lip-service as recently as fifteen years ago, is now believed by no-one under 35. A practical consequence for me:
I've stopped accepting interviews with the MSM except by email — which is why I have on record Andrew Lawler's malice
and mendacity in The Secret Token, his book on Virginia Dare. But Jared Taylor's experience, cross-posted here,
suggests you can't even let the swine take photographs.
Media
Beclowns Itself Spreading Fake News and Anti-Trump Propaganda During Iranian Missile Attack. As Iranian missiles
rained down on U.S. military targets in Iraq Tuesday night [1/7/2020], two cable news outlets, MSNBC and CNN, spread fake news
that suggested that the damage was worse than it was. The Pentagon confirmed that Tehran fired more than 12 ballistic
missiles targeting two military bases used by US and coalition forces in Iraq. During a broadcast of Hardball on MSNBC,
NBC News Tehran bureau chief Ali Arouzi parroted Iranian state media propaganda claiming erroneously that Iranian rockets had
killed 30 American soldiers.
Media
Falsely Claims Vice President Pence is Wrong About Suleimani and 9/11 Attackers. On January 3, 2020, Vice
President Mike Pence tweeted this about General Suleimani: [Tweets] The New York Times responded that the public record
does not back him up. The Los Angeles Times claims Pence falsely links Iranian general to 9/11 attacks. Both newspapers
and the others echoing them are lying or just wrong. The public record actually does back up the Vice President completely.
All one need do is look at the 9/11 Commission report on page 241.
Deutsche
Bank Fake News Story Debunked. [Scroll down] In another chapter of the Great Trump Conspiracy, A Deutsch
Bank whistle blower had revealed that a State Run Russian Bank had funded all of the institution's loans to Donald Trump for
many years. Thousands of Tweets with that tag. I counted more than 40 good size pages who picked up the
story. Yet not one major source. This is what fake news smells like! And the digging began. [...] So the
moral of the story is this, my friends. Don't be stupid. 90% of what you see on the web is garbage, and fake news
is now big business. Stop clicking links spouting sensationalist garbage that you know full well most likely isn't true
just on the off chance that it might be true. It isn't.
The
Media Is Lying About The Attacks On The Embassy In Baghdad. You can tell that the Obama administration's legacy
in the Middle East is in danger because the media, as the self-appointed janitors of that legacy, have gone into overdrive
obfuscating the timing, context, and significance of this week's attack on the United States embassy in Baghdad.
Although President Donald Trump has gone a long way to dismantling Obama's legacy in the region, much more remains to be
done, including a halt to American taxpayer money that has been flowing into Iranian-controlled governments in Iraq and
Lebanon. Earlier this week Iran-backed militias stormed the U.S. embassy in Baghdad, chanting "Down, down USA!" and
hurling water bottles and smashing security cameras. The attackers breached parts of the embassy and were only
disbursed the next day, after Trump deployed Marines to ensure the safety of our embassy personnel and property.
New
Year Ahead: Nothing Will Help Them. The mainstream media has little to look forward to as their fanciful
reportage comes undone. Newsrooms are shedding staff and the papers facing lawsuits by the Covington kids are getting
thinner and thinner. The movie Richard Jewell exposes the media incompetence and partisanship at the cost of
truth. The Washington Post is now so slim my free neighborhood flyer has more copy than it does.
Making
Journalism Great Again. [Scroll down] You would think that the reporters writing the stories were, like
meteorologists, predicting tomorrow's news, rather than recording for posterity known facts and affairs. It is said
that gross inaccuracy should be tolerated in the news business because reporters, even when very wrong, manage to reveal
important unknown events when allowed to "chase a story" like a detective unearthing a clue. When you flip through a
year's worth of pages now bleeding scarlet red dye, though, it is not courage but shame that comes to mind. How many
red-encircled headlines should be endured before reaching the conclusion that this is not "news" but speculative fiction or
straight-up propaganda? Is there a certain percentage of inaccuracy that we could all agree is impermissible?
Would coastal newspapers still feel haughty if they had to print disclaimers below the fold stating that forty percent or
more of what you are about to read might later be proven to be false?
A
Decade of Fake News. The idea of a "decade in review" article at the end of 2019 is a bit of "fake news."
Technically, the current decade does not end until December 31, 2020. In that spirit, it is worth looking back at the
past ten years through the "fake news" lens. These were years in which the mainstream media used false allegations and
biased reporting to suppress conservative voices; they were also the first years in which, thanks to Andrew Breitbart, we
began to resist them.
Media
Standing Up For Antifa. Antifa, a left-wing movement to counter the fascist "alt-right" by conducting acts of
domestic terrorism has been defended by the media as principled individuals united in their common valor to resist the
anti-Trump forces threatening to destroy the country. Exactly how Antifa is pursuing their mission? By destroying
the country. Throughout the year the left-wing militant group has interrupted events and viciously attacked journalists
covering their hate resulting in one reporter suffering a brain injury. "It says it right in the name. 'Antifa,' which
means 'anti-fascism,' which is what they were there fighting. Listen, no organization is perfect, there is some violence,"
CNN's Don Lemon said. "They have taken a principled stand to stand against white supremacists and white nationalists
wherever they may show up," said a guest on MSNBC.
The
Media's Worst Moments of 2019. Our friends at Grabien prepared this montage of some of the media's worst moments
of 2019. Given the media malpractice of the last year, the video could be the length of Ben-Hur, but they've whittled
it down to a mere eight minutes. And it is a fun walk down memory lane, as pretty much all of the media's worst moments
have, by now, blown up in their faces. [Video clip]
Schiff
and Complicit Media Are Due For a Reckoning After IG Report Exposed Their Lies. Now that the inspector general
report on FISA abuse has vindicated the work of Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA), the former chairman of the House Intelligence
Committee, and thoroughly debunked the fraudulent conspiracy theories and smears of the current chairman Adam Schiff, many
conservatives are crying out for retribution. At the very least, Schiff should face an ethics complaint for lying in
his memo, American Commitment President Phil Kerpen says.
Our
Outrage Over the Dems' Impeachment Farce. The most infuriating thing about Democrats and fake news medias' fake
outrage over Trump's alleged crimes is everyone knows Trump has done nothing wrong. He has functioned totally within
his presidential authority. Democrats and media are attempting to criminalize Trump defending himself while exposing
their corruption. The only thing Trump is guilty of is keeping his promise to do everything within his power to make
America great again. Folks, it feels like we are in an episode of "The Twilight Zone" in which Democrats' and medias'
reality is the polar opposite of the truth. With straight faces, they authoritatively lie about every issue. Our
economy is booming. And yet, Democrats and media say people are suffering horribly in Trump's economy. Blacks are
enjoying a historic low unemployment rate. Dems and media tell blacks Trump is a white supremacist seeking to harm them.
OAN
Investigative Report: Ukraine, Biden, and Far-Left Media Malpractice. This is Deep State chicanery
exposed for all the world to see — IF they are willing to pay attention. When the far-left media claims
there is "no evidence" of wrongdoing by Joe Biden, Ukraine, Obama administration officials, etc., they are pushing an
outright lie. The evidence is clear, it's available, and it's incredibly damning to the wrongdoers involved as is so
clearly outlined in the following OAN news report: [Video clip]
CrowdStrike:
a Conspiracy Wrapped in a Conspiracy Inside a Conspiracy. Long story short, the Democrat-media complex has
successfully convinced one half of the world that Trump is a Russian agent. Now they're acting as if they'd spent the
last three years in a coma, unaware of any bombshell stories about collusion. And bombshell stories without any
continuation are a telltale sign of fake narratives. The only consequence of these bombshells is mass amnesia among the
foot soldiers. The Trump-Russian outrage is dead, long live the Trump-Ukraine outrage. And when that outrage is
dead, the next outrage that will be just outrageous. The current impeachment narrative alleges that Trump used military
aid as leverage in asking Ukraine to dig up dirt on Joe Biden (which implies the Democrats know Biden is dirty, otherwise why
bother?). What's not in this picture is CrowdStrike. Even though Trump mentioned it in the phone call, it has nothing
to do with the Bidens nor the Javelin missiles. CrowdStrike has nothing to do with impeachment. We're told it's
just a silly conspiracy theory in Trump's head, that it's a nonissue.
Media's
Latest Anti-Nunes Smear Is Michael-Cohen-In-Prague All Over Again. Devin Nunes' opponents in the Resistance
seem to be spiraling. Their latest effort against the top Republican on the House Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence is to accuse him, without evidence, of secretly meeting in Vienna with a former Ukrainian official "to get dirt
on Biden." The official is former Ukrainian prosecutor general Viktor Shokin, who former Vice President Joe Biden famously
bragged about getting fired in exchange for $1 billion in loan guarantees from American taxpayers. Incidentally, if
there is one thing we have learned from the media in the last couple of months, "get dirt" is their code for Republicans doing
investigations. "Investigate" is their code for Democrats trying to get dirt on political opponents. It appears the
same term could be used regardless of the political views of those doing the investigations.
Media
Hypes Fusion GPS Founders as Victims. It's a little like the proverbial child killing its parents and throwing
itself on the mercy of the court because he's now an orphan, but, with the wheels of Barr-Durham-Horowitz justice inexorably
turning on them, there are Fusion GPS founders, Glenn Simpson and Peter Fritsch, on a media book tour claiming they are the
victims of right-wing vengeance for their role in orchestrating a criminal fraud upon the FISA court and a coup against a
sitting president of the United States.
60
Minutes gives us a migrant sob story except that all signs suggest the migrant is pretty rich. The news show
began with a sad story of Tania Avalos, who, along with her purported husband and daughter, attempted to cross the
rain-swollen Rio Grande river illegally, resulting in two deaths. 60vMinutes matched the event to a widely reported news
photo of the two dead bodies in the river. The man who died was Óscar Alberto Mart'nez Ram'rez, and toddler was
named Valeria. The news show never got around to asking why the last names of the parents did not match, and tellingly,
never gave the last name of the father which is kind of an indicator of something they don't want us to know. After
all, 'who, what, where...' — the old news industry standard. Were they really a family or were they cobbling
together a fake family to take advantage of asylum laws as large numbers of migrants do? They certainly knew enough
about it to understand that they were to surrender to the Border Patrol, so they weren't utter naifs as they had been
portrayed in terms of their odds.
Reuters
Deletes Story Meant to Make Trump Look Bad After Realizing it Made Obama Look Bad. Reuters completely deleted a
wire story concerning the number of children in migrant detention centers after discovering that the author's figures were
from 2015 and do not reflect the current number of children in such centers. Adding an editor's note or something of
the like was tossed for a complete revocation, which is always last and worst case scenario in the news world.
Nets
Cheer Sondland 'Directly Implicating' Trump, Then Admit He Didn't. During an 11:00 a.m. ET hour break in
Wednesday's [11/20/2019] impeachment hearing, all three broadcast networks eagerly proclaimed the U.S. Ambassador to the
European Union, Gordon Sondland, was "directly implicating" President Trump in a "quid pro quo" with Ukraine. However,
just minutes later, those same networks admitted that Sondland never heard any such thing directly from the President.
"Well, Gordon Sondland, clearly the man of the hour there, as we are halfway through the questioning," Nightly News anchor
Lester Holt declared during NBC's special coverage. He further claimed that Sondland "dropped a lot of bombshells" and
"Is now implicating the President directly." He emphasized that Sondland "had direct communications with the President."
[...] The only problem with those pronouncements? They weren't true.
Nixon's
Lessons for the Would-Be Impeachers. One of the nauseating permutations of public recollection that has arisen
out of the attempts to destroy Trump is that Richard Nixon was treated fairly.This fraud is buttressed by the frequent
appearances on our screens of the chief trigger-men in that bloodless assassination: the unspeakable turncoat White House
lawyer John Dean and Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, still padding around on the imperishable fuel of the Watergate putsch,
festooned with the awards the media give themselves.
Impeachment
surprise: How Adam Schiff validated my reporting on Ukraine. For weeks, media have claimed my Biden
column was a debunked "conspiracy theory" and no one saw anything wrong. Now we know the very people working on Ukraine
policy below Joe Biden in the State Department saw the appearance of a conflict, long before I reported it. And they
were so concerned about Burisma's corruption reputation that they took official actions to distance the U.S. from the firm
that hired Hunter Biden.
New
York Times Admits No One Believes the Liberal News Media Anymore. Here's an excerpt from the Trump-hating New
York Times. ["]But just when information is needed most, to many Americans it feels most elusive. The rise
of social media; the proliferation of information online, including news designed to deceive; and a flood of partisan news
are leading to a general exhaustion with news itself.["]
Here's
How Impeachment Helps Democrats Even If They Fail. Today's Democrat Party is a joke that would cease to exist
if not for the unwavering support of the massively powerful corporate media. Long before this revelation, it always
amused me when people like Resistance Jake Tapper or others in the media would claim: "We don't choose the
stories. The stories choose us. All we're doing is reporting what's going on in the world. That's our job."
It amused me because they literally write the headlines. They choose exactly what stories to cover. As has
become painfully obvious to anyone with a pulse, they also choose the narratives attached to those stories and how every twist
and turn is characterized throughout the 24/7 news cycle. If you couple those realities — that the media are
nothing more than Democrats' marketing arm, and that they're responsible for deciding what we talk about and how it's
characterized — it becomes really hard to take "the news" seriously.
The
View's Joy Behar: Buttigieg Has a 'Very Traditional Marriage'. Joy Behar, co-host of "The View,"
expressed her support of Democratic presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg on Monday, saying that the mayor of South Bend,
Ind., is "in a very traditional marriage." Traditional marriage is defined as the union between one man and one woman.
When
Did Ukraine Become a 'Critical Ally'? On hearing the State Department's George Kent and William Taylor describe
President Donald Trump's withholding of military aid to Ukraine, The New York Times summarized and solemnly endorsed their
testimony: "What clearly concerned both witnesses wasn't simply the abuse of power by the President, but the harm it
inflicted on Ukraine, a critical ally, under constant assault by Russian forces." [...] "One would think, listening to this,"
writes Barbara Boland, the American Conservative columnist, "that the U.S. had always provided arms to Ukraine, and that
Ukraine has relied on this aid for years. But this is untrue and the Washington blob knows this." Indeed, Ukraine
has never been a NATO ally or a "critical ally."
President
Trump. vs. the Media. Since Trump defeated Hillary Clinton in the 2016 Presidential election, leftists in the
mainstream media, which is to say virtually all of the mainstream media have abandoned nearly every pretense about who they
are, what they represent, and what are their goals. It is safe to say that many of the problems we face in America
today are directly attributable to the fact that, because of their warped worldview, the vast majority of the American media
simply won't tell the truth. This is especially troubling when one considers that the American media has lied and
continues to lie on almost every moral issue debated in America.
Trump
Derangement Syndrome on Steroids. The American Prospect's Paul Waldman gives us an earful about President Trump
and how Trump is destroying everything that's good and decent in America. [...] What strikes me is Waldman's unchecked
assertion that Trump's accountability "has been in short supply." He wholly ignores that Democrats have been feverishly
pursuing Trump since he announced his candidacy. For two years, they've prosecuted a bogus case on Trump "colluding"
with Russia, guaranteeing they had unimpeachable evidence. They were lying, and their would-be savior, special counsel
Robert Mueller, produced no evidence of collusion. Accountability? Why haven't the Democrats had to answer for
their wasting taxpayers' time and money over this lie? Neither they nor their legacy media co-conspirators have uttered
one syllable of apology to the American people, let alone President Trump, for dragging us through this nightmare.
Killing America
in anonymity. The media tells us there is a "heroic" whistle blower who claims President Donald John Trump
broke a law — never specified — in a phone call to the newly elected president of Ukraine.
President Trump released the transcript of the call, which shows nothing of the sort. Nevertheless, the media is pushing
for an impeachment to boost cable news ratings, and to divert attention from the best economy in 50 years, Disney's
ABC covering up Clinton's involvement with pedophile Jeff Epstein, and peace breaking out in Syria after 8 years of
war. But the media is deliberately refusing to name Eric Ciaramella as the Obamanaut who spied on the Trump
administration from within, just as Obama ordered the FBI to wiretap the Trump campaign.
Where
were the whistleblowers on foreign policy during Obama's terms? [Scroll down] Instead of the media being
unbiased observers and reporters, they have been active participants in the indoctrination of the public that Trump is a
lawbreaker, ignores the Constitution and is a racist, homophobe, xenophobe, dictator and fascists among other names as they
say Trump is divisive. The meddling by the media to destroy Trump and elect Democrats is much more dangerous to the
integrity of our elections than anything Russia or any other foreign country has or is doing. When the media is
intentionally peddling false stories about Russian collusion, lies about what Trump said about Charlottesville, blocking
opposing views on climate change, attacking Kavanaugh with no evidence or burying the Jeffrey Epstein story they are
campaigners, not reporters. They are anything but fact checkers.
Attenborough
Tacitly Admits Netflix on 'Walrusgate' Tragedy Porn. It was one of the most heart-rending animal tragedy
episodes ever shown on TV: hundreds of walruses shown plunging over a cliff to their deaths out of "desperation" caused
by climate change. Or so the story originally went when Sir David Attenborough first told it last year on his
Netflix documentary Our Planet, causing much upset to impressionable viewers.
The
Washington Post's Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Week. A top National Security Council official, Tim
Morrison, who listened to President Donald Trump's July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymr Zelensky, testified
in front of Congress on Thursday. But that morning, ahead of the testimony, senior political reporter Aaron Blake reported
that Morrison would confirm acting U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Bill Taylor's account that Trump appeared to seek a quid pro quo.
In fact, the opposite happened. Morrison noted the multiple false assertions made by Taylor, and testified that he never
thought anything illegal was discussed on the phone call.
Media-Democrat
Tantrum [is] a Fear Response. Media bias comes in many forms, but one of the most effective forms is in their
ability to frame stories. There is an entire cottage industry in "Republicans pounce" stories to frame even terrible
Democrat news as somehow harmful to Republicans. But to frame this story the way the media want to frame it, they
needed help. This is why we now have dueling investigations, one a complete façade and the other deadly
serious. There is no secret in how these will be covered by the media. The fraud impeachment circus will be
treated with full gravity and seriousness, while what might be the most important investigation in U.S. history will be
treated as political payback.
Counting
the Ways the Washington Post Loves Them Some al-Baghdadi. I knew the usual suspects at our failing, far-left,
fake news outlets such as CNN, NBC News, the New York Times, and Washington Post, would attempt to spin one of
America's great days as the exact opposite. We would be told audacious lies about how taking out al-Baghdadi would only
make things worse, only proves Trump's Syria policy is a disaster, how this successful mission happened in spite of Trump,
and that Trump's perfectly-calibrated statement and willingness to answer the media's questions at length would be twisted
into a crass victory lap. But even I, your humble writer, was floored when the Washington Post lamented the loss
of that dear, sweet man al-Baghdadi — a vile terrorist responsible for thousands of innocent deaths, a monster who
engaged in serial rape, and a sub-human, barbaric sociopath whose entire legacy is one of torture, murder, rape, tyranny and
terror — including of his own people.
Unfortunately
Fox News Continues Deliberate Misinformation. Moments ago Fox News host Shannon Bream promoted a segment on her news program
outlining the pending House 'Impeachment Inquiry' resolution scheduled for tomorrow [10/31/2019]. During the broadcast segment Bream
stated, falsely, that President Trump would be granted the following participatory measures as an outcome of the resolution:
[Screen-grab] This is deliberately false information. The resolution does not convey any of the outlined measures to the
Executive Branch.
White
House Knocks Washington Post 'Religious Scholar' Terrorist Obituary. The White House on Monday [10/28/2019]
knocked the Washington Post obituary for founder of the Islamic State terrorist organization Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
after he was killed during a United States raid on Saturday. "Despite what the Washington Post wants you to
think, this was not some religious leader, a religious scholar, this was a terrorist, a disgusting man with a record of death
and viciousness and destruction," White House Deputy Press Secretary Hogan Gidley said in a Fox News interview on Monday.
Social
media parodies the Washington Post's tone-deaf obituary headline that called ISIS leader al-Baghdadi an 'austere religious
scholar'. A Washington Post obituary referring to Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi as an 'austere religious scholar' after
the ISIS mastermind was killed in a US military strike has sparked a deluge of death tribute parodies on Twitter. The
newspaper came under fire on Sunday after it changed the headline on al-Baghdadi's obituary two times — first calling him
'terrorist-in-chief', followed by 'austere religious leader at the helm of ISIS' and finally 'extremist leader'.
Twitter users seized on the second iteration, accusing The Post of painting al-Baghdadi in an inappropriately positive
light given the brutality he championed while leading the terrorist organization.
Washington
Post headline: "Austere religious scholar at helm of Islamic State dies at 48.". Look at this, on the
front-page at The Washington Post: [Illustration] It's as though the paper is honoring him. I
wonder how long that will stay on the front page in that form. It's the teaser for [an] obituary, and there is another
article — to the left — about the military raid, "Trump says Islamic State leader Baghdadi blew himself
up as U.S. troops closed in." Note how that forefronts Baghdadi's agency. He "blew himself up." If you click
through to the obituary, the headline is different — "Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, Islamic State's 'terrorist-in-chief,'
dies at 48." So that makes the form of the headline on the front page even more startling — "Austere
religious scholar..."
Washington
Post Columnist, CNN Analyst Suggests Al-Baghdadi Did Not Die Like a 'Coward'. Washington Post columnist
Max Boot on Monday [10/28/2019] suggested ISIS founder and leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi did not die like a "coward" as
President Trump described on Sunday, arguing that the president's assertion is "contradicted by the fact that rather than be
captured, he blew himself up." Boot, who is both a Post columnist and CNN analyst, wrote in a column on Monday
that Trump turned al-Baghdadi's death into another "risible spectacle."
NY
Times: Trump Gets No Credit for Baghdadi Raid. The Washington Post says al-Baghdadi was just an "austere
religious scholar," but if you don't buy that line the New York Times has another hot take: the successful raid on Baghdadi's
hideout occurred despite, not because of, President Trump: [...] These are no doubt the same "military, intelligence and
counterterrorism officials" who have been behind 5,000 or so previous anti-Trump stories in the Times. As William
Jacobson points out, there is nothing to the Times story. Intelligence sources located Baghdadi, the military asked for
permission to go after him, Trump granted permission, and the raid was carried out successfully. The Times has nothing.
Washington
Post columnist issues correction after claiming Baghdadi [was] not a coward. The Washington Post was
forced to issue a correction after columnist Max Boot said Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al Baghdadi was not a coward because
he evaded capture by committing suicide. Boot initially stated in his Monday [10/28/2019] column that, "The assertion
that Baghdadi died as a coward was, in any case, contradicted by the fact that rather than be captured, he blew himself up."
After backlash from people accusing Boot of praising Baghdadi in an attempt to make a dig at President Trump, the Washington
Post deleted the line and issued a correction.
Washington
Post Mourns Passing of "Austere Religious Scholar" Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. Reactions vary to the U.S. killing of ISIS terrorist chief Abu Bakr
al-Baghdadi. However, perhaps the most alarming headline was the sympathetic obituary from The Washington Post: [...] The Washington Post was not
alone in their sympathy over the killing of the brutal terrorist. Bloomberg News also followed quickly with deep sympathies for the death of a leader
who "transformed himself" into a "teacher of Koranic recitation": [...] In an era where the ideology of U.S. media has become increasingly disconnected from
the majority of Americans, it is becoming less surprising to see radical leftist positions in mainstream organizations. However, that said, for any U.S.
media to position themselves as sympathetic to one of the most brutal terrorists in the last half-century, is a level of disconnect far beyond comprehension.
Trump
economy surges and Biden and Obama hog the credit. This is the continuing history rewrite of the left to
explain the booming economy in the third year of Mr. Trump's presidency. Today we are at or below record levels of
unemployment, inflation and interest rates in half-a-century. Wages and salaries are rising at their fastest clip in at
least two decades. There are an all-time high 7 million unfilled jobs in the United States. The Washington Post
is freaking out about the continued good news on the economy — and especially the latest data — that I
reported on these pages two weeks ago that median household income is up by $5,003 since Mr. Trump became
president. This was based on Census data, but The Post ranted last week that Donald Trump continues to "inflate his own
numbers." Nearly every assertion in the article was wrong or twisted — and Mr. Trump was right.
The
Russia hoax: The Left's willful ignorance and denial. As we see and hear leftists spew their anti-Trump
vitriol all day long on CNN and MSNBC and the others, anchors and guests — Jake Tapper, Chuck Todd, Chris Wallace,
and their favored guests, for example — one has to wonder, has not one of them ventured to read any of the books
or the vast number of columns written by real journalists that have laid out in detail how the Russia hoax was orchestrated?
Who instigated it? Who paid for it? Even Friday [10/25/2019], after hearing that the Barr and Durham probes into the
origins of the hoax are now criminal investigations, they all dismiss this bit of news as, get this, a political witch hunt!
Whereas they were actually conducting a secret search for a crime in deep, dark crevices where none existed, they now have the
gall to call Barr's and Durham's investigations "political."
GOP
Has A Choice: Fight Anti-Trump Coup Effort Or Surrender Government To Democrats. Corporate media is
trying to spin the Ukraine story as if it is something other than what it is. As if it were legitimate and quickly
moving. Mike Allen of Axios opined of impeachment that "It's remarkable how fast it has gotten off the ground.
You can see how quickly the Ukraine phone call came out of nowhere to become the all-consuming impeachment topic —
way faster than the impeachment inquiries into Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton." Yes, this is a really good talking point
if you ignore literally everything that has happened since November 8, 2016. [...] Just as in 2000, the media screeching over
Rep. Matt Gaetz and his colleagues fighting the secret efforts — which are literally being led by a man who
lied to the public for years, falsely claiming he held evidence of Trump's treasonous collusion with Russia to steal the 2016
election — is not an objection to what Gaetz and his colleagues did but anger that some Republicans have the
audacity to fight back against what Democrats and the corporate media are doing.
NY
Times Wrote an Entire Fake Article About Ukraine 'Scandal'. The New York Times alleged in a false news article
that "Ukraine Knew of Aid Freeze by August, Undermining Trump Defense." The Trump-Zelensky phone call was made the end
of July. There goes another NYT lie. The August info didn't undermine anything. It backed up the
President. The NYT wrote, "In fact, word of the aid freeze had gotten to high-level Ukrainian officials by the first
week in August, according to interviews and documents obtained by The New York Times." That is irrelevant since the
call took place on July 29.
Seeing
Some Trees in the Forest of Babble. The hypnotic babble of the media beguiles otherwise intelligent people into
believing that Russia colluded with President Trump to defeat Hillary Clinton, that Trump forced Ukraine into investigating
Hunter Biden and did something, we can't say what, to be impeached, and that thousands of poor Kurds are being displaced
because we pulled some hundreds of our troops from the Syrian-Turkish border. Rational, fact-based analysis shows all
this to be untrue, but breaking through this hazy thinking is not an easy task. Maybe because that's the true aim:
eradicating reason totally.
The
Anatomy of a Terrible Liberal Media Lie. I have to tell you a remarkable personal story, a story that proves
the liberal media are, in fact, out to frame and ruin President Donald Trump and his supporters with lies, distortions and
misrepresentation; a story that proves the liberal media are vicious, untrustworthy and sometimes just plain evil. I
was in Miami last weekend to speak in front of 1,200 conservatives at a fabulous three-day conference called AmpFest19.
Speakers also included Donald Trump Jr., Sarah Huckabee Sanders and Dinesh D'Souza. The event was organized professionally.
The speakers were inspiring. The crowd was enthusiastic. And the energy was sky high. But it turned out the
liberal media sent spies into the audience to try to ruin, denigrate and demonize the event, and kill all the joy.
Here's
why the media is lying to you about Mick Mulvaney's Ukraine comments. Thursday night [10/17/2019] on the radio,
LevinTV host Mark Levin discussed a press conference held by acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney held earlier
that day and how the mainstream media covered it. During the press briefing at the White House, Mulvaney explained that
foreign aid to the Ukraine was held up over the summer in order to see if the country would commit to cooperate with an
ongoing Department of Justice investigation regarding potential corruption in the 2016 election. Several in the media
said that the acting chief admitted to a "quid pro quo" with Ukrainian officials, which is central to Democrats' and the
media's Trump impeachment narrative. Mulvaney explained that conditioning aid money happens "all the time with foreign
policy," adding that funding was being withheld from Central American countries at the same time in order to force their
cooperation on immigration policy.
Journalists
Have Become Hoaxers. Big media played its part in the Trayvon hoax as in NBC doctoring George Zimmerman's 911
call to make Zimmerman appear a racist, providing a racial angle for his self-defense shooting of Trayvon Martin. CNN
referred to Zimmerman as a "white Hispanic" to keep the race angle front and center. Did they ever refer to Barack
Obama as "half black" given the white skin color of his mother? Are these hoaxes accidental or deliberate? Is
this sloppy reporting or an attempt to shape a narrative rather than simply report the news?
Good Riddance
to Shepard Smith. Shepard Smith was the worst thing on Fox News not because he was an anti-Trump leftist, but
because he lied and lied and lied, claiming he was not. There are plenty of anti-Trump leftists on Fox News, and that's
a good thing. It is also to the eternal credit of Fox that, unlike its competition on the far left — CNN and
MSNBC — Fox actually airs a legitimate diversity of opinions on the issues of the day, most especially President
Trump. That was not Shepard Smith. No, rather than come out of the partisan closet, rather than put on the
uniform, rather than step into the arena, like way too many in our perversely corrupt news media, he chose to hide like a
coward behind a shield of objective truth, a shield of capital "J" journalism, which made him a dishonorable and
thoroughly despicable liar — which is why his ratings were so awful.
The
Curious Case of the Incurious Press. Instead of expressing curiosity about why the Bidens had been the subject
of a criminal investigation in Ukraine, reporters fell into lockstep with the Democrats' impeachment narrative.
Everywhere you turned for the last two weeks, whenever a reporter was talking about Biden at all, it was to talk about how he
was being maligned by Trump, that he had been cleared of any wrongdoing, that the claim that he had gotten a prosecutor fired
to protect his son was a "debunked conspiracy theory." When you asked who cleared Biden, you got no answer except the
news media themselves.
Bloomberg
Retracts Hit Job Article Falsely Claiming Antisemitism From Trump Labor Aide. One month after Bloomberg Law
published a story with false allegations of antisemitism from a Trump appointee at the Department of Labor, the outlet has
officially retracted the article. "In reporting on a series of social media posts from Department of Labor official
Leif Olson, we failed to meet our editorial standards for fairness and accuracy," Bloomberg said in a statement announcing
its decision where the article would otherwise be posted. "We regret that lapse and apologize to our readers and to
Mr. Olson."
Media
Pretend China Isn't Communist. China is communist. They have a Central Committee, Politburo, and a
General Secretary. China is ruled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The word "Communist" is right there in the
name. And yet, the mainstream media isn't so sure. They regularly downplay the ideological nature of the CCP.
They have even taken to advancing the idea that China isn't communist at all, but in fact, capitalist.
News
Station Tries To Claim Chick-Fil-A Has The Slowest Drive-Thru Line And Immediately Gets Demolished By The
Internet. Chick-fil-A is so good at serving people quickly and efficiently that it's become a meme in and of
itself. People are willing to get into what could be considered overly long lines for their drive-thru that spill out
into intersections — I've seen it with my own eyes — not just because the food is good, but because
they know that no matter the length of the line, they'll be in and out fairly quickly. However, WWBT-TV in Richmond,
Virginia, posted the results of a study that measured drive-thru wait times, and their conclusion was that Chick-fil-A was
the slowest of them all. [...] The study is pretty misleading with its claim. While it may take longer to get your food
from a Chick-fil-A, the line is moving the absolute fastest. The only difference is that more people are at Chick-fil-A.
Our World In Fake Data.
It took me about thirty seconds to research the accuracy of the graph. The Red Cross described 1927 as the worst year
in history, reporting 111 disasters — including 29 tornadoes, 24 floods, 9 hurricanes and 23 fires.
The worst floods in US history occurred that year. [...] Obviously the person who generated the graph didn't do any research, and is
simply making numbers up. Another graph from the same website shows death rates from natural disasters down 95% since the 1920s.
One Climate Chart
to Rule Them All. You would think that 50 years of failed climate predictions might have eroded their
haughtiness somewhat. But you'd be wrong.
Yup,
Looks Like That Big Anti-Trump, Whistleblower Story Was All Smoke And Mirrors. The media has spent the past few
days speculating all the ways in which the Trump presidency could end after a whistleblower lodged a complaint regarding
President Donald Trump's communications with an unknown foreign leader. It turns out the complaint is nothing more than
a rumor reported by someone in the intelligence community. Buried in a lengthy CNN article about the complaint is the
following paragraph: ["]The whistleblower didn't have direct knowledge of the communications, an official briefed
on the matter told CNN. Instead, the whistleblower's concerns came in part from learning information that was not obtained
during the course of their work, and those details have played a role in the administration's determination that the
complaint didn't fit the reporting requirements under the intelligence whistleblower law, the official said.["]
Brett
Kavanaugh Breaks the Democrats. Rarely does a story implode as spectacularly as the New York Times'
latest effort to resurrect the claim that Justice Brett Kavanaugh was a teenage sexual predator. By now, you know the
facts: The Times published an excerpt from a forthcoming book alleging that another woman suffered the same form
of abuse and objectification from Kavanaugh that was alleged by another accuser, Deborah Ramirez. No sooner had the
universe of liberal political observers and politicians worked themselves up into a frenzy than the story fell apart.
The woman whose uncorroborated experience supposedly substantiated Ramirez's uncorroborated assertions wasn't even the one
making these accusations. Rather, they came from a Washington D.C. attorney with conflicts of interest who did not
contact the Senate Judiciary Committee during Kavanaugh's confirmation proceedings. What's more, she doesn't even
remember the experience that was supposedly so traumatizing — a revelation that was inexplicably omitted from the
Times' original draft.
Air
Force plan to refuel near Trump's Scottish resort approved under Obama, reports show. Last week some in the
American mainstream media ran reports suggesting that the U.S. Air Force's decision to refuel some of its planes at an
airport located near the Trump Turnberry, a Scottish luxury resort that's owned by President Donald Trump, was rooted in
corruption. These same media outlets also took aim at a U.S. Air Force squadron that stayed overnight at the resort
itself during a stopover in Scotland last March. The reports were based on a dubious investigation by House Democrats.
The
Trayvon Martin Hoax Comes Crashing Down. With a mediocre economy, growing questions about the efficacy of
Obamacare, and a lethargic base waking up from a hope hangover to find that the president had left them hanging on the change
part, the media knew that President Obama couldn't win on his record. The media would need a controversy to galvanize
the base and shame moderates into reelecting President Obama. And so, when an unarmed black teenager was shot and
killed by a man claiming self-defense, the media pounced. They routinely used a years-old photo of Martin as a smiling
young child. Zimmerman was depicted with a mugshot. The message was clear: Martin was just a young child
wearing a hoodie and eating Skittles while Zimmerman was a deranged menace.
The
Intelligence Community Works for the President. It's simply hard to know where to begin to respond to the
staggering chutzpah of Jennifer Rubin's recent Washington Post opinion column accusing the president of undermining
our intelligence community. Rubin used the recent leak regarding the exfiltration (a fancy word for "removal") of an
undercover "asset" in Russia as a hook to make the case that the president is somehow responsible for outing this source and
therefore harming U.S. interests. Her column is an example of the backward view elite leftists have towards democracy
and the Constitution. These elites, in desperate need of a remedial civics class, have convinced themselves that our
elected president must learn to take orders from the intelligence community.
U.S.
poverty falls to lowest level since 2007 and media's response is downright comical. Did you hear that the
poverty level fell below where it was prior to the economic collapse twelve years ago? Probably not, because legacy
media doesn't want you to hear about that. They don't want you to realize the economy is in better shape than it's been
in decades. [...] They don't want you to know this because if you realize you're doing better, you're more likely to
acknowledge much of this is due to President Trump's first term in the White House.
An even mixture of sensationalism, dishonesty, and incompetence: CNN's
big 'mistakes' all run in one direction: anti-Trump. CNN blared an "exclusive" headline Monday [9/9/2019] with
a story purporting that US intelligence made the decision to "extract" a spy that it had working within the Russian
government because officials believed his cover may have been compromised by President Trump having "repeatedly mishandled
classified intelligence." That dispatch from Jim Sciutto, CNN's "chief national security correspondent," would have
certainly been a smash if it weren't for vehement denials by the administration and subsequent reporting that contradicted
the crux of the story — that it had been Trump who screwed up the intelligence operation. During a White
House press briefing on Tuesday, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo called CNN's reporting "materially inaccurate."
The
Sketchy Russian Spy Exfiltration Story. First, the tenuous reporting from CNN, where they attempt to paint
Donald Trump into the spy narrative, is transparently political opportunism by narrative engineer Jim Sciutto and the
anti-Trump brigade. You know Sciutto's efforts are bad when even the Washington Post and New York Times undercut the
CNN script. The exfiltration had nothing to do with President-elect Trump, or President Trump. The part where the
story becomes interesting is: (A) the timing; and (B) that DC journalists know who the "spy" is.
Indeed the claimed "spy" and his family have been living under his real name in Washington DC. This fact doesn't fit
the outline of a retracted spy living in an era of imminent danger.
It's Official:
The Democrats Just Want You Dead. Americans are normalizing violence in their politics, but not in the way the
media and the "experts" would have you believe. No, "white supremacists" are not the greatest threat to your safety,
despite what Don Lemon and his cohorts in the Fake News Industrial Complex say. In fact, of 250 shootings in America
wherein four or more people were shot (which is the official definition of a "mass" shooting), not one of the perpetrators
was a conservative, let alone a "white nationalist." But that hasn't stopped the Democrats.
Hurricane
Dorian Can't Save CNN, MSNBC from Losing over Fifth of [their] Audience. CNN lost 21 percent of its already minuscule
audience last week, MSNBC lost 24 percent, while Fox News grew its already enormous viewership by six percent, as TVNewser
highlights. Yep, even the massively over-hyped news about a mass shooting and a regional weather story —
Hurricane Dorian — could not stop the bleeding at both of these far-left, Russia Collusion Hoax channels.
Labor
Official Who Resigned Over Bloomberg Reporter's Smear is Reinstated. A senior policy adviser at the Department
of Labor who was forced to resign last week after a Bloomberg Law reporter smeared him, was reinstated Wednesday night, the
Daily Caller's Luke Rosiak reported in an exclusive. According to a senior Labor Department official, Acting Secretary
Patrick Pizzella "personally made this decision after carefully reviewing all the facts and circumstances." The official
added, "he concluded that a correction is much better than an injustice."
Department
Of Labor Reinstates Leif Olson After Bloomberg's Libelous Attack On Him Blows Up In Their Faces. Yesterday
[9/3/2019], a vicious and dishonest reporter working for Bloomberg named Ben Penn ran a vicious and dishonest story smearing
labor attorney Leif Olson, a recent hire by the Trump Department of Labor, as an anti-Semite based on some Facebook
commentary on Paul Ryan's electoral curb-stomping of what appeared to be an actual anti-Semite (though, in fairness, not
sufficiently so as to stand out at a meeting of the House Democrat caucus), Paul Nehlen. Any sane reading of the
commentary would have identified it a facetious and making Nehlen the butt of a joke. But Penn and his editors pushed
out the story branding Olson as an anti-Semite. Instead of doing the right thing, a gutless Department of Labor asked
for Olson's resignation.
Bloomberg
News Yet Again Screws Up Major Story and Doubles Down on Stupid. President Trump often characterizes the media
as the enemy of the people. It is really hard to say he is wrong in the case of Bloomberg. It has gotten multiple
major stories demonstrably, harmed the reputations of American companies, cost a man his job, and stands by its demonstrably
wrong reporting. Bloomberg is harming other news outlets with its behavior.
The myth of ecocide.
It is hard to think of any other global event this year that has been as awash with misinformation as the rainforest
fires. We've been told these fires are a calamity, an act of 'ecocide'; they're proof of humanity's contempt for the
environment; they will blacken and possibly even destroy 'the lungs of the world', as the rainforests are referred to, given
they produce 20 percent of the world's oxygen. It's all untrue.
Drudge
tries to spook Trump voters again. Another Friday and another hamfisted attempt by the Drudge Report to
undermine support for President Donald John Trump. A week ago, Matt Drudge was sure that the trade war with Red China
was going to do The Donald in because the Dow Jones Industrial Average was down. A week before that Drudge had us in a
recession not caused by Red China. Drudge has linked and bannered stories about wars with Iran, North Korea and Syria,
which never materialized.
It
becomes clearer every day that most journalists would rather have Democrats in power than a good economy. Like
everything else, whether it is fictitious Russian collusion, claiming Trump is mentally incompetent, claiming everyone hates
us overseas, and playing the race card, the media is essentially campaigning for Democrats instead of doing their job of
reporting the truth. The strategy appears to be working somewhat because, despite record job openings, wages rising
faster than any time while Obama was in office, and record low unemployment, especially for minorities and the less-educated,
tax cuts that benefitted almost everyone, stock markets near record highs, many people have been indoctrinated to believe the
economy is collapsing.
In the last 2 weeks alone.
CNN had one host threaten to throw a guy down the stairs, the other was accused of sexual assault, & a third's bodyguard
assaulted a reporter. Another host had a shrink claim (unchallenged) that Trump murdered millions more than Hitler,
Stalin & Mao. Meanwhile CNN hired one of the key architects of the coup against Trump just as we learned, as if by some
weird coincidence, that there is a completely separate IG report into the misdeeds of the CNN new hires ex-boss. [...] MSNBC
joined in the collective braying at the blood moon of Trump-Russia collusion by having their designated hammering
hallucinator claim he also heard there were Russians in Trump's bank account.
The
media refuses to face the fact that Joe Biden isn't close to collapsing. Dear Fellow Members of the Media: We
need to talk about the way you're covering the Democratic race for president. Consider this an intervention. You all
went crazy on Monday [8/26/2019] when a single poll showed a national tie between Joe Biden, Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders.
It was like a ticker-tape parade through the Canyon of Heroes; articles suggesting a historic shakeup in the Democratic race rained
down upon America like ticker tape. Huzzah! We have a whole new race!
Throwing
Punches for the Children — If This is Your Mantra, Zip It About Trump. Trump is just a callous and unfiltered version
of the "sophisticated" slander the left has been lobbing against the right for years through a corrupt and complicit mainstream media.
For proof of that, we could start scrolling through the endless accusations of the last few decades: centrist John McCain was called a
racist, the affable George W. Bush was tagged a bigoted war criminal, mild-mannered Mitt Romney was labeled a tax cheat, felon and
murderer. And this wasn't done by fringe activists — these were libelous claims published by mainstream media organizations
coordinating with their ideological allies in the Democrat Party.
Recession? Headlines
in Search of a Story. On August 19, the Washington Post's first sentence summed up their one-dimensional
angle on the National Association for Business Economics' August survey: "Most economists believe the United States
will tip into recession by 2021, a new survey shows, despite White House insistence the economy is sound." So it went, with
most establishment news outlets bent on finding the gray cloud around today's current sterling economy. Negative news
sells. Perhaps it has always been thus, though it certainly seems most prevalent when it is adverse to this administration.
The
Democrat Party Is A Joke That Would Cease To Exist Without The Media's Support. On literally every issue, the
Democrats are social psychopaths whose goals are so far out-of-touch with reality that they have to lie in order to pitch
them. There isn't a single thing the Democrats want and/or fight for that they're honest about. Every single
issue gets packaged in a hilarious euphemism that's designed to help make their goals more palatable, because their ultimate
objectives are so totally insane that nobody would ever in a million years be okay with them. And that's where the
media comes in. The media's job is to be a marketing arm for the Democrats.
Stunning
Day of Economic Gaslighting — Despite All Positive Data, Corporate Media Cheering For Recession. The
long-term borrowing rate for return on investment dropped momentarily lower than the short-term borrowing rate of return on
investment because massive numbers of foreign investors were rushing to buy long-term U.S. bonds. Wait... what?
Yes, a 'negative yield curve' is what happens when everyone wants to buy bonds in your long-term economy.
Delingpole:
Every Story You Read About the Environment Is #FakeNews. [Scroll down] In the face of such overwhelming
'evidence', what possible reason could any casual reader have not to believe that world is indeed in the midst of an
unprecedented environmental crisis wherein critically endangered species are being wiped out by callous, out-of-control,
unregulated hunters, where extreme weather is endangering homes and lives, where not even the formal gardens in Britain's
world-renowned stately homes are safe? This, my friends, is why we are in such trouble. Every one of those
stories is a lie. Almost every word of every one of those stories is a lie. But how many of the people who read
those stories would be aware of this?
If
Deplatforming Hoaxsters Is OK, the News Media Should Be in Big Trouble. MSNBC's Katy Tur reported on May 2
that, "Facebook has banned a number of conspiracy theorists" then wondered aloud why it had taken the tech company so long to
do it. [...] Now, that kind of chutzpah requires a heavy dose of magical thinking laced with a stunning lack of self-awareness
and doused with a toxic level of hypocrisy. And it would be amusing if it wasn't so enraging. Because these
reporters hail from the very same news organizations that have intentionally misled the American public about three destructive
hoaxes in the past year alone: The Trump-Russian election collusion ruse; the Brett Kavanaugh rape allegations; and the
Covington Catholic High School "smirking" myth. CNN, the New York Times, the Washington Post and NBC News used every ounce
of their considerable influence and reach, including social media, to promote each fraud for one collective purpose: To
destroy the presidency of Donald Trump and defame anyone associated with the president including pro-life teenagers.
White
supremacy paranoia is a massive HOAX perpetrated by the toxic media that pushes hatred, bigotry and lawlessness. Though
the Left has been seething with animosity over what it perceives as America's 'white-dominated' society for years, in the lead-up to
the 2020 election they have come out and made hating white people an official platform of the Democratic Party. And shame on
the party's officials and leaders for allowing it to happen. In particular, the hatred is manifested in the establishment
media-created and driven lie that a) "white supremacy" and "white nationalism" are one in the same; b) both are a major
problem; and c) white supremacists are everywhere (especially at rallies held by POTUS Donald Trump). It's all a
fabrication, mind you. The fact is we probably couldn't fill a college football stadium with the number of actual, avowed
"white supremacists" in America, and in a nation of nearly 330 million people that's saying something.
Blame
the media for racist violence, not Trump. The leftist playbook is simple: the mainstream media create
false Trump narratives, and they repeat them far and wide until the false narrative becomes an accepted "truth." The
current narrative is that Trump is a racist. The significance of the racism charge is not lost on these connivers,
because racism is second in its universal disrepute only to pedophilia. Now they are capitalizing on it when real racists
commit heinous acts of violence as they pin them on Trump as if he is responsible. Here is the problem, though:
we have yet to see any evidence, even flimsy evidence, that this president really is a racist.
Tucker
Carlson: 'Conspiracy Theory' of White Supremacist Threat is the New 'Russia Hoax'. As conservatives to line up
and capitulate by supporting gun control, tech censorship, and other unconstitutional policies in the wake of this past
weekend's mass shootings, Fox News host Tucker Carlson is one of the few commentators with the courage to say the
truth. With media-fueled hysteria over white supremacists reaching a fever pitch in recent days, Carlson addressed the
growing concern on his show, calling it a "conspiracy theory" on par with the "Russia hoax."
It's
not just Trump being blamed, competing networks use shootings to suggest silencing Fox News. As much as the
left ignores that the Dayton, Ohio, shooter was a self-described "leftist" who favored Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass.,
for president, they work even harder to call attention to the El Paso, Texas, shooter's anti-immigration manifesto in an
effort to pin that shooting on President Donald Trump. While Warren gets a pass in the media for the Dayton shooting,
there are reports the El Paso gunman was also an environmental extremist who embraced Eco-Fascism. Having commandeered
language in America, the liberal media deems words used to describe the flood of humanity overwhelming our border, words like
"invasion," to be racist.
FBI
Says The Media Wrongly Labeled Gilroy Shooter A "White Supremacist". As we've learned in the past week, the
political ideologies of mass shooters are deeply important unless they are on the far left. Then it's irrelevant and
it's journalistic malpractice to even report on it. That's the contrast that's been drawn between the shooting in El Paso
and the one that took place in Dayton, OH early the next morning. I've been assured on social media that the difference is
that the El Paso shooter left a manifesto (which has still not been technically confirmed) and that the Dayton shooter
didn't. Therefore, I'm told, it's completely out of bounds to draw any speculation from the latter's calls to violence
against "fascists," his repeating of Antifa rhetoric, or his support for socialism.
If
Anyone Is Spreading White Supremacy, It's The Media, Not Trump. I knew the moment that I heard about the El
Paso shooter's manifesto on Saturday that this shooting would become about President Donald Trump's supposed racism. In
fact, at the time of this writing, #WhiteSupremacistInChief is trending on Twitter. But despite continuous claims and
talking points circling around Trump's hatred of minorities, no one can ever point to something that Trump said that was
actually racist. When they do mention something that he said, they can never quote him verbatim, just one or two
words. "He called immigrants animals," they tell me along with other famous claims like calling immigrants "rapists"
and "criminals." Did Trump say those things? Yes, but the context is so out of sync with the stories that are
pushed about him.
MSNBC
and CNN Claim Trump Was Never at Ground Zero after 9/11 Attacks; Videos Prove Otherwise. On Monday [7/29/2019],
when President Trump signed the 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund extension, he told a story of being at Ground Zero after the
9/11 terror attacks, that immediately got unhinged liberals coming out of the woodwork to claim he was lying. Kyle
Griffin, a producer at MSNBC, actually claimed there was no evidence Trump was ever at Ground Zero after 9/11: [...] CNN's
Chris Cillizza also strongly implied Trump was lying: [...] Others in the media quickly piled on, challenging Trump's claim.
Fact-Check:
NYC 9/11 Top Cop Confirms Trump Was 'Constantly' at Ground Zero. After the Islamic terrorist attacks of
September 11, 2001, President Donald Trump was "constantly" at Ground Zero "motivating" and "inspiring" first responders
during their rescue efforts, confirmed Bernie Kerik — who served as New York City's police commissioner at the
time — in a Tuesday [7/30/2019] interview [...] News media outlets such as CNN and Vox characterized Trump as
mendacious following Trump's recollection of 9/11 and its aftermath during public remarks on Monday [7/29/2019] regarding
his signing into law an extension of the 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund.
Donald
Trump Didn't Lie About Where He Was after the 9/11 Attacks, But Hillary Clinton Did. The liberal media has egg
on their faces for claiming that Trump lied about being down at Ground Zero after the 9/11 attacks. Despite video
evidence that has been floating around on the internet for years, they just couldn't help themselves. It's curious,
however, that the candidate that they all wanted to win in 2016, Hillary Clinton, actually did lie about where she was on
9/11 in order to insert herself into it.
FNC's
Wallace: Trump Is Calling People of Color 'Vermin' — 'It Sounds Subhuman'. On this weekend's
broadcast of "Fox News Sunday," anchor Chris Wallace questioned White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney on President Donald
Trump's attacks on Rep Elijah Cummings (D-MD) and the city of Baltimore. Wallace said, "This goes back to what happens
with the four members of 'The Squad.' Nobody objects to the president defending his border policy, but this seems to be the
worst kind of racial stereotyping."
The Degrees of
Fake News. [Scroll down] What an eye-opener that press conference was! Sitting among the Washington
press corps before the Contras arrived, I felt like I was witnessing a gang of thugs plot an ambush. There was no
pretense of impartiality. Many of the reporters there were openly enamored of Nicaragua's Marxist ruler Daniel
Ortega — he of the cool mustache and designer eyeglasses — whose major "achievement" had been to
redistribute wealth from friends of Somoza to friends of Ortega, even as Nicaragua's economy languished. Ortega's media
allies didn't even bother paying attention to what the Contra leaders said during the press conference. The reporters
were too busy chomping at the bit, waiting to trash the Contras and to bash President Ronald Reagan for supporting the
Contras' anti-communist insurgency. The reporters had an agenda. Objectivity and truth-telling were no part of
it. They were rude and blatantly scornful toward the Contras. They couldn't wait to file their stories painting
Nicaragua's anti-communist resistance in the most unflattering light. It was sickening. It wasn't just
unprofessional; it was journalistic malpractice.
Democrats woke and
broke. Fox News reported, "The Republican National Committee raised more than twice as much as the Democratic
National Committee in June — $20.7 million compared to the DNC's $8.5 million, according to Federal Election
Commission filings, Politico reported." The story also said, "The RNC currently has $43.5 million, more than double
the cash on hand as the DNC's $9.3 million." More than double? It is nearly five times as much cash on hand.
New
York Times Fudged Book Sales Data To Torpedo 'Justice on Trial' Best-Seller Ranking. The New York Times fudged
book sales data in order to deny top-five billing to the best-selling "Justice on Trial," the definitive and deeply reported
account of the nomination and confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, which was written by Carrie Severino and
Mollie Hemingway, a Senior Editor for The Federalist. Industry sales figures show that the New York Times ignored
actual data on nationwide sales in order to depress the rankings not just for the Hemingway/Severino book, but also Mark
Levin's latest book on the corruption of modern journalism. According to Publisher's Weekly, the only public source of
point-of-sale data on book sales, "Justice on Trial," was the top-selling non-fiction book published over the last week.
Immigration: The Path
To Power. MIT says our illegal immigrant population is about 22 million. Yale says it is between 16 and
30 million. The 11 million figure so popular in the media is ridiculous and a total lie.
Lack
of Bigotry in America Forces Media to Invent 'The Hoaxtroversy'. If racism in America was anywhere as serious
as the fake news media claims, would they have had to fabricate all these massive lies over the past few years? The
media told us the Hispanic George Zimmerman was white. They hoaxed us with the KKKids from KKKovington High School,
"Hands Up, Don't Shoot," and Duke lacrosse. Each one of those phony hysterias blew up in the media's lying face, so now
they have changed tactics. Rather than invent massive national hoaxes to smear America and Americans as small-minded
bigots, they have turned to the "Hoaxtroversy," they have begun to fabricate meme-like controversies, and still they are
forced to lie.
GOP
Candidate Gets Ridiculed For Deciding His Reputation And Livelihood Are More Important Than Building Some SJW's Self
Esteem. Mike Pence made quite a splash shortly after assuming office when it was revealed, via a Washington
Post profile of Karen Pence, that he had a policy of not being alone or socializing outside of work with female staff.
In 2002, Mike Pence told the Hill that he never eats alone with a woman other than his wife and that he won't attend events
featuring alcohol without her by his side, either. This, as mamy recognized, is simply good common sense that had been
called the "Billy Graham Rule," having its genesis in the "Modesto Manifesto" that governed the actions of pastors affiliated
with Graham's evangelical movement.
Mississippi
politician tells female reporter she can't interview him unless she's with a man. A Republican candidate for
Mississippi governor told a female reporter that he couldn't be interviewed by her unless she was accompanied by a male
colleague — later claiming that he was following "the Billy Graham Rule." "We just wanted to keep things
professional," said GOP hopeful Robert Foster in a radio interview on Tuesday [7/8/2019]. The female reporter, Larrison
Campbell of Mississippi Today, had been asking to go on a "ride along" with Foster when his campaign director reportedly
refused on his behalf.
WATCH
CNN Try To Shame Underdog Republican Candidate Who Wouldn't Grant Access To Female Reporter. CNN's New Day John
Berman tried to shame an underdog Republican candidate, Robert Foster because he wouldn't grant a Mississippi reporter access
to him for an interview when they were alone. Foster explained very eloquently why he felt the need to ask Mississippi
Today reporter Larrison Campbell to bring someone along with her for the interview if they were going to have one.
Larrison made a massive deal about it, and the story wound up on CNN. Larrison also embellished the story that she
had been barred from Foster's campaign because she is a woman. It turns out that Foster was smart in decision making if
Campbell felt she had to grow this request into a scandal for the Republican candidate.
Media
Magic — How a Democrat Pedophile Became a 'Trump Scandal'. [Scroll down] As stories go, a
child sex case involving a Palm Beach billionaire was pretty big. It was covered in the British press, in Florida
media, at The New York Post, and at Fox News. Bill O'Reilly led with the story on his Fox News show. But
CNN and MSNBC did not breathe a word about a Democratic prosecutor refusing to hold a Democratic child rapist accountable.
Corporate
Media Push Trump-Jeffrey Epstein Conspiracy Theories Without Evidence. The establishment media is attempting to
link President Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein without any evidence connecting him to the underage sex trafficking case
against the billionaire hedge fund manager. Immediately following a Daily Beast report revealing Epstein's Saturday day
arrest, a handful of news figures and outlets posted social media posts and stories painting a picture that the wealthy
investor's arrest was bad news for President Trump — with one editor even going as far to suggest he could be
directly implicated in the case.
Media
Predictions of "Tiny Crowd" For Trump July 4 Speech Proven Spectacularly Wrong. The media ran headlines right
up to the day of President Trump's July 4 speech predicting only a "tiny crowd" would show up. How spectacularly
wrong they were. [...] In reality, photos from the event show crowds stretching the full length of the national mall.
8
Times The Media Said There Was No Crisis At The Southern Border. Now that media-savvy congressional Democrats
like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have brought attention to the humanitarian crisis on the U.S.-Mexico border caused by
Congress's refusal to fix our exploited immigration laws, political pundits are having to eat their own words from just a few
months ago claiming that the border crisis was manufactured by President Trump as a political stunt. Last week, before
President Trump departed for the G20 Summit in Japan, he told reporters on the White House lawn that his critics are now
seeing he was right all along.
Tragic
Photo Undermines Media Credibility on 'Manufactured Crisis' at Border. Townhall put together a montage
insisting not only that Trump had made up a "manufactured crisis" but outright lied that there was a crisis at the border in
the first place. The clip begins with CNN's Don Lemon asking:"This last ditch effort to persuade Americans that there
is a crisis at the border - did it work?["] [...] In April, The Media Research Center's Bill D'Agostino put together a
montage of media figures finally admitting that it was a crisis. Over at Fox, Tucker Carlson put together his own
montage of mainstream liberal media acolytes insisting as follows: [...] Doubtless there's more of this kind of utter
wrong-headed frothing denial out there in the media.
Biden's Mythical
Mass of Support. Something very strange is going on with our news media, as it covers the state of the 2020
campaign. Donald Trump, according to the big news outlets (CNN, the New York Times, ABC, the Washington
Post, and their brethren), is on the ropes. The polls from these same news outlets show him losing by catastrophic
margins to virtually every Democratic candidate. Even Senator Cory Booker (D-N.J.), who is polling at 2 percent among
Democrats, would defeat Trump in every key state. Joe Biden — according to the polls and the
pundits — would crush Trump even in the reddest of the red states. Forget the Midwest — Biden is
so wildly popular, even Texas is now out of reach for the GOP. Quinnipiac says Biden will squash Trump like a bug in
Florida — 50 percent to 41 percent. In fact, another Quinnipiac poll reports a tsunami of Bidenophilia
is sweeping the nation from coast to coast. "Joe Biden is ahead by landslide proportions," says Quinnipiac.
The Editor says...
The news media thrive on neck-and-neck horse races, where the lead changes every hour, depending on who's speaking.
An impending landslide doesn't compel you to tune in every day to learn the latest details. Sensationalism sells
advertising.
Trump:
Smarter Than The Experts. Remember the bold predictions made by the New York Times' economist and
resident expert, Paul Krugman? The Nobel Prize winning economist said that the economic fallout of a Donald Trump
presidency would be severe and widespread, predicting that it could "plunge the world into recession." He penned his view in
an opinion piece published the day after the election. Calling Trump both "ignorant and irresponsible," he said that
his election would be the "mother of all adverse effects." He warned that the new administration could quickly undo the
progress that markets had made in the eight years since the financial crisis. He was wrong. The Trump economy
continues setting records. Employment, real wages, consumer confidence, all moving ever higher. We wait in vain
for a correction or apology from Krugman or the Times. They rarely find room to share the good economic news with
their shrinking readership. The truth does indeed die in darkness.
New
York Times Reporter Falsely Labels Segregationist Senators Republicans. Appearing Thursday [6/20/2019] on
CNN Newsroom, New York Times national political reporter Astead Herndon falsely labeled segregationist Democrat
senators whom former Vice President Joe Biden praised for their "civility" Republicans. The day prior, MSNBC host Kasie
Hunt made the same error by misidentifying Sens. James Eastland (D-MS) and Herman Talmadge (D-GA). She has since issued
a correction, while Herndon has yet to follow suit.
How Dangerous is Fake
News? Did you know that last week two hundred illegal immigrants originating from the Congo, that were picked
up by border patrol agents, have tested positive for the deadly and highly contagious Ebola virus or that a company
whistleblower announced that YouTube has been placing millions of subliminal anti-Trump messages in a variety of
videos? You most certainly did not. But nearly every American has heard of President Donald Trump colluding with
Russia and calling all Mexicans rapists or of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulting women even though
these events never took place and were concocted out of thin air.
Turns
Out The Reported Racist Delay Of Harriet Tubman's $20 Note Was Fake News. A few weeks ago, it was announced
that a new $20 bill graced by Harriet Tubman wouldn't be shown in 2020. This set off a wave of condemnation and claims
of racism backed by absolutely no evidence. We are supposed to believe that Trump dislikes non-whites so much that he
personally intervened in the situation and delayed the project. [...] Now, more details are coming out and as per usual,
there's a lot more to the story and none of it involves Donald Trump at all.
Irish
bar debunks fake news that Don Jr. and Eric Trump skipped out on bill. Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, the
eldest sons of the president, were targeted by fake news after a recent bar crawl where they picked up the tabs of their
fellow patrons. A Saturday [6/8/2019] story from The Daily Beast was published with the headline "Eric and Donald Trump
Jr. Still Have Not Paid Irish Bar Tab." While leftists made the story go viral and immediately used the headline
to trash the Trump family some more, the whole thing was complete and utter nonsense. Reporter Arthur Schwartz almost
immediately jumped at The Daily Beast and the authenticity of their story.
EPA
Admin Rips Journalist For Misleading Tweet: 'Most Reporters Are Lazy'. Environmental Protection Agency
Administrator Andrew Wheeler ripped into a Yahoo News reporter in a Friday interview over a tweet he believed took remarks he
made out of context. Yahoo national correspondent Alexander Nazaryan tweeted Monday [6/3/2019] that Wheeler had said
during a National Press Club event that "'The media does a disservice to the American public' by reporting on global
warming." [...] But in the full quote in the article, Wheeler didn't actually say the press did a disservice by "reporting on
global warming," full stop, but for not also reporting on the strides the country had made. "The media does a
disservice to the American public, and sound policymaking, by not informing the public of the progress this nation has made,"
he said.
NPR
says babies aren't babies until they're born. [Scroll down] Doctors and nurses describe "how your
baby grows and develops" during the first — and each subsequent — trimester for parents who are
expecting. They do not typically refer to "your fetus." During ultrasounds nurses don't point to the screen and
say, "Look at that thing there, your fetus is a boy!" (Nor do they say, "I'm arbitrarily assigning the
gender 'boy' to your fetus").
Pew:
Fake News Tops Terrorism, Violent Crime, Climate Change as 'Very Big Problem in Country Today'. "Made-up
news/info" is considered a major problem by more adults in the U.S. than concerns like terrorism, violent crime, and climate
change, results of a nationwide Pew Research Center study released Wednesday [6/5/2019] show. Half (50%) of U.S. adults
polled called fake news and information "a very big problem in the country today," compared to only 34% who cited
terrorism: • Made-up News/Info: 50% • Violent Crime: 49%, •
Climate Change: 46% • Racism: 40% • Illegal Immigration: 38%
• Terrorism: 34% • Sexism: 26% About two-thirds of adults said that fake news and
information has "a big impact" on Americans' confidence in government (68%) and creates "a great deal of confusion" about the
basic facts of current events and issues.
Poll:
Majority says mainstream media publishes fake news. Nearly two-thirds of Americans say the mainstream press is
full of fake news, a sentiment that is held by a majority of voters across the ideological spectrum. According to data
from the latest Harvard-Harris poll, which was provided exclusively to The Hill, 65 percent of voters believe there is
a lot of fake news in the mainstream media. That number includes 80 percent of Republicans, 60 percent of
independents and 53 percent of Democrats. Eighty-four percent of voters said it is hard to know what news to believe
online.
Anti-Trump
Traitors Rip Blindfold Off Lady Justice. [President] Trump brought back jobs that Obama decreed were gone
forever. Black, Hispanic, and female unemployment are at historic lows. Trump pulled us out of bad deals with
foreign governments. Thanks to Trump eliminating absurd regulations and oppressive taxes, businesses are coming home to
America building factories. The average American wage is $27 per hour. Americans are enjoying an economic
boom. All this incredible good news is for the most part being hidden from Americans. Instead, Democrats, fake
news media, Hollywood, and social media flood the airwaves with their lie that Trump is horrible for America.
Trump-McCain Tarpgate:
Yet Another Outrage That Wasn't. By the time I learn enough about the latest current-events kerfuffle to
realize I don't care, it turns out to be [nonsense] anyway. And so it is with the outrage du jour: Tarpgate.
[...] Now, it's not exactly a secret that John McCain hated Trump's guts, and the feud has continued even after McCain's
death. Trump still badmouths a corpse, much to the delight of Trump's biggest fans. So this story sounds
plausible. It sounds like something Trump would do, and something Trumpkins would defend. But does that mean it
actually happened? Sure, it confirms my prejudices, but does that mean it's true? It's starting to sound like
maybe it isn't.
'Mainstream'
media has a new fact-checking standard: 'Kinda plausible'. [E]ven if you instill in your kids your
conservative, pro-America, constitutional values, they are going be inundated with Left-wing pabulum, propaganda, and
disinformation virtually every moment of their higher education experience. Case in point: One professor, Ian
Bremmer, a geopolitical analyst, journalist, and cable news regular, actually attributed a 'quote' about North Korea to POTUS
Donald Trump that was 100 percent made up, but posted on Twitter as though it was real — and then he
actually defended his actions and his lie.
Impeach or get off
the pot, Democrats. The same people who never met a constitutional amendment they didn't want to weaken or
destroy will now act as if a middling procedural showdown is the next Watergate. Mainstream media stories about
Nadler's fishing expeditions have already framed Democrats as stewards of law and order, forced into impeachment by
inflexible Republicans.
No
Room for Honesty. Listen to various abortion activists and Hollywood-faded stars and you might be under the
impression that Georgia, Alabama and other states have just passed laws that could give women the death penalty for having
abortions. In fact, some news outlets have run stories that these states would arrest women for having abortions.
Sadly, at a time when the news media and progressive activists lament the President's dubious relationship with the truth,
these are not just misstatements but outright lies. Last week, Alabama passed a law that would prohibit abortion except
for situations where the mother's own life is at risk. News outlets faithfully reported that under this law, women
could be jailed for having an abortion.
Dear
Media: Women Made the Alabama Abortion Law Happen. Twenty-five white males are responsible for Alabama's
new abortion legislation, according to the news media. But, if Americans look more closely, they'll find that's a blatant
miscalculation. Women — pro-life women — are the driving force. The "Alabama Human Life Protection
Act," or HB 314, considers abortion and abortion attempts felony offenses, except in cases where it's done "to prevent a serious
health risk to the unborn child's mother." The law acknowledges that women are victims of abortion and "will not be held
criminally culpable or civilly liable." On Wednesday, HB 314, which was sponsored by a woman, was signed into law by
another woman. But rather than dwell on the oddity of pro-life women, the media blamed another group: white men.
The
credentialed media's creeping attempts to normalize 'transgenderism'. It was not so long ago that the
credentialed media referred to the person now going by the name Chelsea Elizabeth Manning as a 'transgender woman,' formerly
known as Bradley Manning. In an act of unbelievable stupidity, the government, under President Barack Obama, did not
challenge Mr Manning's filing legally to change his name to Chelsea, though at least the government didn't attempt the idiocy
of transferring him to a women's prison. President Obama commuted the remainder of Mr Manning's prison sentence just
before he left office. Even in those stories of the past, the credentialed media chose to use the feminine pronouns to
refer to Mr Manning, something with which I disagreed, and something which this site does not do. But in the
[Washington] Post's current article, Mr Manning's 'transgenderism' is never mentioned, nor that he was known as
Bradley Manning when he committed his crimes.
Should
Journalists Go to Jail for Spreading Russia Lies? As a First Amendment maximalist, I am inclined to reply an
automatic "no" to my own headline — should journalists go to jail for spreading Russia lies? But a penalty
of some kind, indeed a serious one, should certainly be levied for misinforming the public on the most important subject of
our day, which has happened repeatedly over the last few years concerning the Russia probe. And when these
prevarications can be shown to have been deliberate, to have been done knowingly, difficult as that may be to prove, the line
to sedition may have been crossed and there is an argument the reporters involved should face legal consequences. They
should also be fired.
Man
sentenced in burning of church painted with 'Vote Trump'. A member of an African American church in Mississippi
has been sentenced to 10 years in prison for burning the church, which was also spray painted with "Vote Trump" a week before
the 2016 presidential election.
The Editor says...
That headline is misleading, because the AP left out several important details. The whole thing was a fake hate
crime. He was a black criminal trying to cover his tracks. It had nothing to do with voting for Trump.
Don't
Believe the Headlines: Mueller Said Barr Memo Was Accurate. The internet is currently buzzing over
allegations that Attorney General William Barr mischaracterized the Mueller report from none other than Robert Mueller
himself. [...] These headlines all suggest some sinister attempt by Attorney General Barr to mislead the public about the
Mueller report in his four-page memo on the report's findings. But, when you actually read beyond the headlines you'll
discover that the media is doing all the misleading here.
How
Pseudo Events Are Used by Media to Manufacture Controversy. The public was lied to for close to two years by
legacy news outlets and public figures with claims there was "evidence" that the Trump administration colluded with
Russia. Contrary to their claims, the Mueller report showed there was no evidence that Trump colluded with
Russia. The report showed that all those rumors of evidence and all those claims of anonymous sources were lies.
What's important to remember is that for these outlets and public figures, facts don't matter. What matters is how they
can twist the facts to keep the public misled and distracted in order to keep their false narratives alive.
Media
Caught Selectively Editing AGAIN — Record Your Interviews! It seems that the media can't be
trusted, they need to be watched. And you can help us watch them. If you've been witness to interviews with the
media, deceptively editing your remarks we want to hear from you.
Thirdhand
Hearsay Story Says Mueller Prosecutors Had the Goods on Trump to Charge Obstruction. [Scroll down] This
violates almost every rule set out by Perry Bacon of FiveThirtyEight in "When To Trust A Story That Uses Unnamed Sources."
It is attributed to only two people, and even then, it is a third-party recollection of a conversation in which the reporter
did not participate. Given the sourcing, the quotes are virtually impossible to verify — another tipoff
that a story probably is not true. The third-hand sources are identified only as "former Mueller prosecutors," which
means the story runs up against Bacon's recommendation that "specifics matter" when identifying anonymous sources. Waas
claims the Mueller team prosecutors "would have advocated" that Trump face federal criminal charges for obstruction.
BBC
and Attenborough Accused of Fake News Misinformation on 'Climate Change: The Facts'. The Global Warming
Policy Foundation (GWPF) has made a formal complaint to the BBC about the series of gross inaccuracies in its recent
documentary Climate Change: The Facts. As wags have quipped, the programme presented by Sir David
Attenborough was so riddled with errors it really should have been called Climate: Change The Facts.
Now the GWPF has written to the BBC Complaints department listing just a few of them.
American Ignorance.
Because I dig deeper than most people I can usually sort out the facts from the fake. One thing I've learned over time
is that the progressive left does not engage in truth nor does it traffic in honor. The left wants to totally remake
our laws, our society and our Constitution into something our founders never intended them to be. [...] Some citizens get
news secondhand from friends, family or work associates. They see headlines on social media and online service providers
like AOL. If they watch news at all they might tune into the local news or sometimes CNN. Too many people will
take what they hear as true. They won't doubt it because after all it's being broadcast by national news organizations
and those organizations certainly wouldn't report something that wasn't true, would they?
Trump Opponents Never Tire
of Losing. Meanwhile the media, having learned nothing from the ratings hit they absorbed due to their sloppy
and often dishonest reports about the Russia hoax, are already parroting Democratic talking points on obstruction of justice.
That they're already carrying water for people like Jerrold Nadler and Adam Schiff suggests that they may well destroy what
little public trust they still enjoy. Journalist Glenn Greenwald, by no means a conservative, is stunned by the media
reaction to Mueller's report: "Pretending they got it right is just worsening the problem."
Netflix
series challenged on claim that climate change causes cliff-diving walruses. A new Netflix documentary series
that features disturbing footage of walruses plunging off a cliff to their deaths — a phenomenon attributed by the
filmmakers to climate change — has sparked a fact-check backlash by critics questioning whether the animals were
actually fleeing polar bears or drones. Leading the pushback is Canadian zoologist Susan Crockford, who said Netflix's
"Our Planet" is misleading the public about the massive gathering of walruses on the rocky beach, known as a haulout, and the
footage showing walruses falling from a steep ledge. She blasted claims by series narrator David Attenborough during
the episode as "contrived nonsense" and "Attenborough's tragedy porn."
Watch
Former Fed Prosecutor Smash Anti-Trump Commentator's Biased Version Of "Truth". What is going on within the far
left media is appalling. They are taking lies and calling them truths and taking truths and calling them lies and then
taking honest public servants and calling them dishonest when their positions don't support the anti-Trump agenda.
America needs more people like [Joe] diGenova to stand up to this dangerous and deceptive hypocrisy that infects nearly every
facet of the media today.
What's the Next Fake News?
It now transpires that the cheating and collusion was done by the FBI, working in cahoots with Hillary's campaign, and The
New York Times and The Washington Post knew it but chose instead to write the very opposite, that it was the
Russkies and Trump. Mueller even told them so during the investigation, but they chose the big lie instead. This
should have been a death blow for the reputation of any newspaper, but if one watches zombie and sci-fi programs on
television all day and night, as Americans tend to do, how on earth can they recognize fake news when they see it?
Everything Trump said or did these past two years sparked an avalanche of thunderous denunciations from both reporters and
editorial writers. Reporters wrote editorials and writers simply lied and presented theories as facts, and they
continue to do so.
Media pulled off big con with Russia collusion story.
The whole thing was one giant lie. And everybody peddling it — from House Democrat leaders, to Senate
Democrats running for president, to the Senate Republican who reported the whole thing in the first place, to the roaring
lions of the Great White Media — knew it was a lie. [...] Now that he is in the White House, President Trump has
carried on delivering on issues that regular Americans actually care about. But the press ignores all of those
issues. All they care about is the Russia collusion hoax.
Russian 'Collusion's'
Greatest Hits. From late 2015 until April 2019, the media, the Left, and the Obama administrative state
hierarchy warned us nonstop that candidate, president-elect, and inaugurated President Trump "colluded" with Russia to defeat
Hillary Clinton, to assemble a suspect cabinet, and to rule in treasonous fashion in the interests of Vladimir Putin.
The former head of the CIA and the director of national intelligence were birthed as permanent analysts at MSNBC and CNN to
sermonize — with wink-and-nod assurances that their past billets and security clearances substantiated their
authority — that the treasonous Trump would likely be impeached, indicted, or quit. A mostly progressive
team of lawyers, with an unlimited budget, no restrictions on time, and with enormous legal powers found all of that
to be a lie.
Stolen
Archives Show the True History of Russia Collusion. [Scroll down] How can anyone take these clowns in
the media seriously? One day, they are literally censoring one of the pre-eminent experts on Russia in the entire
world, telling him he's insane to warn about collusion with Russia; the next, they want to put Trump in jail with no
evidence. Was Russiagate some sick Freudian projection? Or even deflection?
AOC Isn't Even a Good Environmentalist.
Every Dem presidential candidate has endorsed the Green New Deal. The media has covered what should be laughable notions like no
automobiles, regulating diet and eliminating cows, with all the gravitas of innovations in heart surgery. They cover it like
it's a real thing and more, they paint anyone critical of the ideas as bigoted, closed minded, old-fashioned climate deniers and
anti-science crazies. Yes, that's an inversion of the truth, but that's how it's covered.
National Reckoning, My Eye.
The media has managed to impose a kind of groupthink that tells us that America is rife with racism and bigotry, but looking
around and watching television, the only racism I seem to notice nowadays is the one against whites who go to church and
raise law-abiding families. Watch any Netflix or Amazon series and you'll see what I mean. (Better not watch it,
actually.) The priest is always a pervert, the religious families are selling drugs on the sly, and all cops and soldiers
are rapists, racists, and bigots. All criminals are white, blond, and sporting Nazi tattoos. Well, you know the
rest. Political correctness and diversity training have now become standard, and lockstep conformity is the order of
the day.
Photographer
of Starving Polar Bear Admits 'Climate Change' Image Was 'Misleading'. A starving polar bear, rummaging for
food in empty cans, in an ice-free landscape, with a caption that reads: "This is what climate change looks like."
And she blames people for taking the iconic image 'literally'? How else were people supposed to take this
heart-wrenching but deceptive image?
National
Geographic photog admits viral 'climate change' image of starving polar bear was misleading. National
Geographic contributing photographer and speaker Cristina Mittermeier acknowledged Thursday that her now-viral photographs of
a starving polar bear went "too far" in linking the bear's condition to the effects of climate change. In an article
for National Geographic, Ms. Mittermeier wrote that she and photographer Paul Nicklen, who recorded video of the bear,
were "on a mission to capture images that communicate the urgency of climate change"
Duplicity: Mainstream
media outlets change their tune on border crisis amid illegal immigration surge. Months after repeatedly
dismissing and mocking President Trump's claim of a national emergency at the Southern U.S. border, the mainstream media are
grappling with reality, with no less than The New York Times declaring the border crisis at "breaking point." Yet as
recently as February, a New York Times fact-checker of Trump's State of the Union speech tweeted: "President Trump
described illegal border crossings as a 'urgent national crisis.' This is false."
Nunes
files $150M lawsuit against McClatchy, alleging conspiracy to derail Clinton, Russia probes. House Intelligence
Committee ranking member Devin Nunes filed a $150 million lawsuit in Virginia state court against The McClatchy Company and
others on Monday [4/8/2019], alleging that one of the news agency's reporters conspired with a political operative to derail Nunes'
oversight work into the Hillary Clinton campaign and Russian election interference. The filing, obtained by Fox News, came a
day after Nunes, R-Calif., revealed he would send eight criminal referrals to the Justice Department this week concerning purported
surveillance abuses by federal authorities during the Russia probe, false statements to Congress and other matters.
Devin
Nunes Files $150M Defamation Lawsuit Over 'Cocaine, Prostitutes' Story. On Monday, Rep. Devin Nunes
(R-Calif.) filed a defamation lawsuit against The McClatchy Company, Liz Mair, and Mair Strategies, focusing on a May 2018
article that attempted to connect Nunes to allegations of a salacious event involving cocaine and prostitutes. The
article also cast aspersions on Nunes' investigation of alleged collusion between Donald Trump and Russia. He is
demanding $150 million and more. "McClatchy succeeded in linking the cocaine/sex-fueled 'fundraiser' with 'prostitutes'
to Nunes. The defamatory meaning of the article was clearly understood by all who read and saw McClatchy's
publication," the lawsuit reads.
Democrats
and toxic media at their worst. The left and its compliant media are willfully reporting false news to the
American people. Whether it is a symptom of mass hysteria that is the genesis for this confirmation bias-style
reporting or an intentional maneuver to spread anti-Trump propaganda, its effect is toxic and pernicious. The report
comes in the form of a tweet making its way through the Twitter-sphere in which a user named Mark Elliott has posted a video
of Donald Trump who he contends is referring to migrants at the border as "animals." [...] The president's words were clearly
relating to the murderous gang MS-13 and not innocent migrants. The exchange first became a controversy last year when
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi mischaracterized the remarks.
Vox
Writer Praises Progressives for Misleading Americans on Tax Cuts. Vox writer Matthew Yglesias praised
progressive groups for misleading Americans about their taxes Monday [4/8/2019]. In a tweet, Yglesias praised the
"messaging success" over President Donald Trump's Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The president signed the bill into law in
December 2017. At the time, then-Speaker of the House Paul Ryan (R., Wis.) said the bill would save families making
$73,000 per year more than $2,000. "[P]rogressive groups did a really good job of convincing people that Trump raised
their taxes," Yglesias said.
Are
Far-Right Extremist Crimes on the Rise? No. Despite the media coverage [...] far-right extremist crimes
are not on the rise. The number of crimes ascribed to the far-right has been holding steady since the 1970s. [...]
Maybe the goal is to turn mainstream conservatives into "far-right" extremists?
Democrats
and Media Fall For Old, Deceptively Edited Clip of Trump on MS-13. Democrats and members of the establishment
media fell for a viral clip purporting that President Donald Trump called asylum seekers "animals" on Friday at an
immigration roundtable. In reality, the clip in question is from an event in May 2018 when the president was clearly
referring to members of the MS-13 gang as "animals." At the time, CSPAN posted a deceptively edited clip that cut out
someone else's remark about MS-13 that the president responded to, making it sound like Trump was talking about immigrants
more generally.
Why
do the least-bright people rise to the top? For over two years, we have been tormented or delighted, depending
on one's political preference, by the opinions and or declarations avowing President Trump's guilt with regard to collusion
with Russia. It was all a made-up scam from the beginning, but the media and the leftist loons have beaten this dead
horse relentlessly in the fervid hope it would see Trump forced from the office he legitimately won. Our horrific media
who has long worked hand in glove with the Democrats, has spent hundreds of hours, over 500,000 columns, articles and op-eds
asserting Trump's guilt. It was all a hoax from the outset, fabricated within a few days of Hillary 's loss to
Trump. Most of those who got on board the Russia collusion hoax knew it was a lie from day one. But they embraced
the lie wholeheartedly.
Science:
Teen Vogue Declares There Is No Such Thing As Biological Sex Because Reasons. Teen Vogue has a long history of
promoting transgenderism in harmful and objectively false ways. That includes celebrating the child abuse of a
9-year-old boy whose parents allow him to believe he's a girl named Lactatia. Ever the trailblazer, Teen Vogue put out
a video proclaiming that there is no such thing as biological sex because nothing matters anymore.
Mueller the Boy Scout. The media
swore up and down that there had been "collusion" between the Trump campaigns and Russia to defeat Hillary Clinton and fail
to put a Clinton on the throne of America. Now, please bear in mind, that there never was any evidence of such
collusion. Plus, no one knew what it would look like if it had existed. Would it be mountains of newsprint saying
how great Trump was, coming from pro-Russian media here? No such things ever were seen. Could it have been some
major peace move in Ukraine by Russia contingent upon Trump winning? We never saw any sign of that either. Could
it have been an immense contribution from the Russian gold hoard to the Trump campaign? No hint of that either.
So, then what was it? Those of us raised to be skeptical of the media/leftist axis since the successful media coup
against Richard Nixon in Watergate saw right through the whole thing. Watergate was media hysteria over basically
nothing. So was the Trump/Russia collusion, as we saw it and heard it.
Media
amplified Schiff's voice, shouted down the truth. The whole point of the so-called "Fourth Estate" —
that unofficial, quasi-fourth branch of government — is to mercilessly hound politicians from their comfortable
lairs of mendacity. Unless, apparently, those politicians are lying about Mr. Trump and spinning fairy tale yarns
about prostitutes in Moscow hotel rooms, secret liaisons in Prague that never happened, and chance bar meetings in the
Seychelles. No one has been given more airtime and ink to spread his lies than Rep. Adam Schiff, California
Democrat, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee and chief prevaricator. That anyone this dishonest is allowed to
hold a position of such importance and power in Congress tells you all you need to know about Washington these days.
Can the Media Ever Earn Back
Our Trust? After it was revealed on Sunday that the two-year investigation conducted by special prosecutor
Robert Mueller found no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, the finger pointing began. This time, the
national media was under the microscope. It's one thing to hear baldly partisan idiocy from the opposing political
party and its candidates — we expect that. It's another thing altogether when crazed accusations are being
spewed by the press 24/7/365 as if they're fact.
Naming
And Shaming : The Absolutely Worst Reporters on The Russian Collusion Conspiracy Theory. Attorney General Bill
Barr revealed this weekend that special counsel Robert Mueller did not find that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian
government, dealing a hefty blow to a large swath of the media. Perhaps most damaged were the individual anchors and
reporters who bet their careers on proving that President Donald Trump conspired with a foreign power to steal an
election. These journalists authored fake stories, gave breathless coverage to the alleged scandal and ultimately
misled the public.
BBC
Ordered to Pay Damages for Fake News About Trump and Ukraine President. The BBC was ordered to pay damages
after the far-left outlet published fake news claiming Ukraine President Petro Poroshenko "authorized" an illegal payment of
$400,000 to Michael Cohen for additional face time during a June 2017 meeting with President Trump. "We apologize to
Mr. Poroshenko for any distress caused and have agreed to pay him damages, legal costs and have participated in a joint
statement in open court," the BBC's said in a written apology published Thursday [3/28/2019].
A
Primer in "Ventriloquist Journalism". Most "mainstream" journalists are not merely biased, but have a narrative
story line in mind when they begin "reporting," so that when they call you on the phone, they aren't looking for
actual information and perspective — they are looking for a specific quote to drop in their story that fits their
narrative. The point is: when you deal with the media, it is not just their innate liberalism you need to be on
guard for — you need to keep in mind that they already have their story written. [...] Stan Evans had a
typically great label for this: he called it "ventriloquist journalism." Reporters have in mind a specific quote
they'd like to have from you, and have developed great skill in teasing it out of people. Think of it as just one
aspect of fake news.
Rep.
Brooks: 'Fake News Media...Perpetrated the Biggest Political Lie' in American History. In remarks on the House
floor about the Mueller report and the "fake news media" that spread unfounded claims for two-plus years about Russia-Trump
campaign collusion, Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) said the accusations against Trump were "nothing but a Big Lie!" He also
compared the liberal media to the National Socialist propaganda organs that operated in Nazi Germany, spreading half-truths
and lies to demonize their political opponents. "For more than two years, Socialist Democrats and their fake news media
allies — CNN, MSNBC, the New York Times, Washington Post, and countless others — have
perpetrated the biggest political lie, con, scam and fraud in American history," said Rep. Brooks on March 25.
What Price Maddow?
Right now, left-leaning mainstream media is getting flogged, and they deserve it for their dishonest reporting on the
Trump/Russia conspiracy theory. Mass firings and a month of apologies by Jeff Zucker and Rachel Maddow would not be
sufficient to mend the harm these organizations have done to America's trust in news reporting. But the folks who truly
deserve to be put in their place and totally humiliated are the viewers of these pretend news shows. At what point do
the Wellesley and Williams-educated elites look in the mirror and accept the fact that they have been taken for fools?
They have enabled progressive media to manufacture rotten journalism. They never turned the channel.
From
Trayvon to RussiaGate: No Media Reckoning, Only Denial and Tragedy. [A] gander at the media's horror
show of a rap sheet over the last five or so years helps to explain why denial is their only option at this point:
• Trayvon Martin Murdered By Racist White Man • Michael Brown Yelled "Hands Up, Don't
Shoot!" Before Racist Cop Murdered Him • Brett Kavanaugh: Serial Rapist •
Trump Ordered His Attorney to Lie • The Racist White Boys from Covington High School •
Trump Can't Defeat Hillary • Trump Is a Russian Manchurian Candidate
CNN
Continues to Lie About Charlottesville in Attempt to Connect Donald Trump to New Zealand Attack. As Breitbart
News has explained repeatedly, and as CNN's own coverage at the time showed, Trump used the phrase "very fine people" to
describe non-violent protesters on either side of the debate over a Confederate statue — and specifically excluded
the neo-Nazis, whom he "condemned totally." Yet for the past several weeks, CNN has reported that Trump was referring to
neo-Nazis as "very fine people" in Charlottesville. CNN is now using the Charlottesville lie to implicate Trump in the
terror attacks against two mosques in New Zealand on Friday.
14
Media Outlets Spread Hoax About Trump Calling for Violence During Breitbart News Interview. Outside of the
usual-usual fake news to damage Trump and to distract from their failing Russia Collusion Hoax, the media's propaganda effort
here is to make Trump pay a political price for daring to sit down with an alternative news outlet like Breitbart News
and to warn other politicians not to violate the rules about who is "supposed" to be allowed to hold high-profile
interviews. In this particular case, because the president said nothing wrong in his interview with us, the media have
been forced to invent something.
Media
Magic: How a Democrat Pedophile Became a 'Trump Scandal'. As stories go, a child sex case involving a
Palm Beach billionaire was pretty big. It was covered in the British press, in Florida media, at The New York
Post and at Fox News. Bill O'Reilly led with the story on his Fox News show. But CNN and MSNBC did not
breathe a word about a Democratic prosecutor refusing to hold a Democratic child rapist accountable. Epstein had given
more than $145,000 to Democratic candidates and causes, including Bill Clinton, John Kerry, Hillary Clinton and Chuck
Schumer. He was a big Israel backer. Bill Clinton and Democratic activist Ron Burkle were frequent guests on
Epstein's private plane, dubbed the "Lolita Express." [...] But recently, the very news outlets that spiked any news about
this case for the past 13 years are suddenly hot on the trail of Jeffrey Epstein. Why the newfound sense of
decency? The answer is: Because they found a Trump connection.
NYT
Says Border at 'Breaking Point' 1 Month After 'Fact Check' Claimed No Emergency. One month after claiming there
is "no emergency" at the border, the far-left New York Times now concedes the border is at a "breaking point." In
real time, as President Trump gave his State of the Union speech last month, the Times branded the president a liar over his
claim that there is an "urgent national crisis" at our border.
Newsrooms
that rushed to report tax refunds were smaller this year go silent on IRS data showing refunds have increased.
Tax refunds are up from where they were this time last year by 1.3 percent following the fourth week of the 2019 filing
season, according to new Internal Revenue Service data. To be more specific, the average tax refund has increased to
$3,143 from $3,103 last February, according to cumulative statistics comparing the 2018 and 2019 filing seasons. Oddly
enough, certain newsrooms have responded to this development with total silence. I say "odd," because it was just a few
weeks ago that these same newsrooms rushed to report that tax refunds were smaller this year, suggesting either implicitly or
explicitly that the decrease was tied to the Republican Party's tax reform bill.
The
Climate Scare: Ever More Shrill, Ever Less Serious. The Democrats have taken control of the House of
Representatives! And, for their first act, how about some scary "climate" hearings? The New York Times, of
course, takes the occasion to run a big front-page story with the headline (in the print edition — online is
different) "2018 Continues Warming Trend, As 4th Hottest Year Since 1880." Let's apply a little critical analysis.
The Times adorns their article with a huge temperature graph, covering the period 1880 to 2018, that goes across two-thirds
of the top of the front page. The overall trend looks up at first glance. But on not-very-much-closer inspection,
it is obvious that 2017 was down from 2016, and 2018 was down from 2017. How exactly does that constitute 2018 "continu[ing
the] warming trend"? I would have said that the last two years in a row down is the opposite of "continuing the warming
trend," but what do I know?
The
Resistance is Everything They Accuse Trump of Being. In classic KGB style, Obama's administration deployed our nation's intelligence
agencies to infiltrate and spy on their political opponents. Using paid informants — believed to include, at minimum, Joseph Mifsud, Stefan
Halper, Henry Greenberg and Felix Sader — the political appointees heading our FBI and CIA attempted to entrap Trump's campaign with monetary
enticements and promises of Russian kompromat on Hillary Clinton. [...] While these outrages have gone on, our very own American Pravda — the
Democrat's mouthpieces in the mainstream media — have published a steady stream of disinformation and propaganda designed to turn reality on
its head and portray Trump as Vladimir Putin's puppet instead of the target of Soviet-inspired tactics employed by Obama's police state.
What's Worse Than Fake News? Hypothetical
news. The other day all the major new outlets were covering a story about Elizabeth Warren saying on the
campaign trail in Iowa that Donald Trump "might not even be a free person" but rather in jail at the time of the 2020
Presidential election. Call this phenomenon the "hypothetical news." Donald Trump might launch a preemptive nuclear
attack on North Korea. Donald Trump might withdraw from NATO. Donald Trump might fire his Chief of Staff. Donald
Trump might be crazy. More subtle examples of hypothetical news are: there is "widespread concern on Wall Street" that
Donald Trump might fire Fed Chairman Powell; or "White House sources say" that Donald Trump is considering firing Fed
Chairman Powell.
A
New Low in Media Lies from the Miami Herald. It's commonplace and universal: if you're a dissident from the
Leftist agenda, you're not going to get fair, accurate, or honest treatment from establishment media reporters. But in
this hit piece on Hallandale Beach Commissioner Anabelle Lima-Taub, who called Muslim Rep. Rashida Tlaib a "Hamas-loving
anti-Semite" who might "become a martyr and blow up Capitol Hill," Sarah Blaskey of the Miami Herald hits a new low even for
Leftist "journalists," whose integrity was already a notch below that of child molesters, and provides a textbook example of
how those "journalists" distort the facts, libel people, and lie outright in order to manipulate the public into believing
what they want them to believe.
The
'Trump Hid His Meetings with Putin' Stories Begin to Unravel. On Sunday [1/13/2019], the mainstream media
launched a new ploy to promote their Trump-Russia collusion narrative with a story that first appeared in the Washington
Post titled "Officials in dark on Putin talks." A similar piece was published in the Wall Street Journal on
Monday, titled "Trump didn't use notetakers at Putin/ Meeting." Cable-news networks and Democratic congressmen claim these
stories indicate that President Trump held secret discussions with Russian president Putin that were revealed to no one.
For example, Senator Mark Warner (D-VA) told CNN on Sunday that the U.S. government "does not know" what Trump and Putin
discussed. It is now clear that these stories were misleading, if not mostly false.
The
FBI Counterintelligence Operation into Donald Trump Did Not Start After Comey Firing. Against the backdrop of
a New York Times article attempting to justify the FBI opening a counterintelligence operation against Donald Trump the
current narrative du-jour is to claim the investigation was considered as an outcome of the firing of James Comey in 2017.
This is factually false. FBI Director James Comey outlined the specifics of when the counterintelligence operation
began during his March 20, 2017 testimony.
Brandon
Darby: Propaganda About Border Mostly from Mainstream Media. Many mainstream news outlets appear to be
purposely and dishonestly overlooking key facts about the U.S.-Mexico border region in order to push a false narrative about
a safe border. Breitbart Border and Cartel Chronicles Director Brandon Darby took on the recent reporting by CNN's Jim
Acosta and some social media postings by Texas Democrat Robert Francis "Beto" O'Rourke, where they try to claim the border is safe.
My Eye on 'Black
Eye'. The new Fox Nation subscription service posted the documentary Black Eye: Dan Rather and the
Birth of Fake News at 6:00 a.m. (Eastern) this morning [1/10/2019]. The documentary revisits the Rathergate scandal
from its origin in the 2000 presidential campaign to the 2015 film Truth and slightly beyond. I have now watched
the documentary and want to offer a few notes with my impressions on it for what they may be worth. [...] I hope Power Line
readers will view the documentary. It memorializes an important piece of history that has already receded into the
mists of the ancient past.
NYT
Uses Tiny New Mexico Town to Claim There's No Border Crisis. Somewhere along the United States' 2,000-mile
border with Mexico is a town unconcerned by what President Donald Trump has called a border "crisis," and the New York
Times is on it. "On the Border, Little Enthusiasm for a Wall: 'We Have Other Problems That Need Fixing,'" the
Times reported. The source for this claim is not polling data, but rather interviews primarily with residents of
the tiny town of Columbus, N.M. Columbus is home to residents who see little issue with their proximity to the border.
The Times identified at least one citizen who seemed to wish there were more illegal immigration, not less.
When
media are quiet about financial news, you know the economy's strong. We were told the market was going down
because of Trump's trade policies, because he was chewing out the Fed for raising rates too rapidly, and because of the
government shutdown. I am having trouble finding where the media and other Democrats are giving Trump credit for the
market rising around 10% since December 24. Why has the market reversed itself for now? Here are a few hints:
sales during the Christmas season were up over 5%, over 300,000 jobs were created in December, and job gains were revised upward in
both October and November. Wages went up 3.2% year over year, the fastest growth in a long time, and gains are especially
being helped on the lower end of the scale. There continue to be more job openings than job-seekers. It is obvious
that a strong economy does not fit the Democrat agenda, so it is downplayed.
Why
Fact Checking Is A Joke. As soon as President Donald Trump's speech ended, the liberal talking points were
spewing on the cable news networks disguised as "fact checking." Armed with press releases from the Democratic National
Committee, the talking heads universally focused on the small stuff to avoid admitting the inconvenient truths leftists avoid
like the plague — illegal immigration hurts Americans. Democrats don't care. To leftists, individuals
are disposable. Why would they be bothered by a Ronil Singh if they don't care about the 100 million dead their
totalitarian philosophy is responsible for? One more body on the pile of bodies isn't going to bother people unbothered
by the existence of the pile in the first place. But political points had to be scored, the liberal narrative had to be
advanced. Enter the official "fact checkers."
Seattle
TV Station Fires Staffer Who Doctored Trump Speech Video. A Seattle television station fired a staffer for
allegedly doctoring footage of President Trump's speech Tuesday evening — making it appear that that Trump's
tongue was drooping out of his mouth and his skin color to be bright orange. A side-by-side comparison of the speech
that aired live on CNN Tuesday night [1/8/2019] versus what was broadcast later on FOX Q13 shows the video manipulation.
The differences were spotted by political observers, resulting in the station terminating the employee.
Trump
tongue trick lands Seattle TV station Q13 FOX in hot water; editor fired. A staffer at local Fox affiliate Q13
has been fired after the station aired what appears to be a doctored video of President Donald Trump's Tuesday night speech
from the Oval Office. The video was changed to make it look as if Trump was sticking his tongue out languidly between
sentences. In addition, the colors in the video look more saturated, leading the president's skin and hair to appear orange.
Seattle
News Room Intentionally Manipulated Video of President Trump for Broadcast. A statement from Fox affiliate Q13
in Seattle appears to confirm that a news video editor intentionally manipulated video feed from the public address of
President Trump. "In a statement, Q13 noted that the video editor responsible has been placed on leave pending an
internal investigation."
The
Only Privilege in America is Liberal Privilege. Item: Catherine Blasey Ford's cock-and-bull story about
being assaulted by Brett Kavanaugh nearly half a century ago when they were both teenagers. Do not try this tactic
if you are a conservative woman attacking a liberal Supreme Court nominee.
Caught
On Video: Fake News Media Fabricating "Trump Border Crisis.". We all know so much of what passes for
"news" these days is little more than manufactured propaganda ejected daily from the bowels of the Establishment Media to
splatter across the nation's television, computer, and phone screens, but it's always fun to catch them in the act and that's
exactly what the following video does. Watch as media photographers stage a scene of a little girl and her father
attempting to climb over a supposed border fence. [Video clip]
Media's
'19th nervous breakdown,' as Trump fulfills another campaign promise. How many times can the news media falsely
and hysterically sound the apocalypse alarm? Besides being 100 percent wrong on the election of Donald Trump in 2016,
their fear-mongering predictions of doom and condemnation have been wrong on any number of other Trump policies, initiatives
and personnel moves. Those include last year's tax cuts, eliminating the ObamaCare individual mandate, North Korea,
moving the U.S. Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem, the falsely named "Muslim travel ban," employment and manufacturing increases,
Department of Veterans Affairs reform, NATO's financial accountability, two Supreme Court justices, and repudiation of the
Iran nuclear "deal."
How Much
of the Internet Is Fake? Turns Out, a Lot of It, Actually. In late November, the Justice Department
unsealed indictments against eight people accused of fleecing advertisers of $36 million in two of the largest digital
ad-fraud operations ever uncovered. Digital advertisers tend to want two things: people to look at their ads and
"premium" websites — i.e., established and legitimate publications — on which to host them. The
two schemes at issue in the case, dubbed Methbot and 3ve by the security researchers who found them, faked both.
After
Fake News Reports, Media Now Claim Trump's Christmas Visit to U.S. Troops Was Obvious. On Wednesday morning [12/26/2018],
media outlets were running the story that President Donald Trump had failed to visit U.S. troops at Christmastime. By Wednesday
afternoon, the media claimed Trump had made his visit to a war zone obvious in advance. In between, media outlets that had earlier
trumpeted Trump's supposed non-visit to the troops were spinning the news that he had, in fact, visited by noting that it was his first
visit to a war zone since taking office. Left-wing Salon.com, for example, reported initially that Trump had failed to visit the
troops during Christmastime, then changed its story and headline, but retained the anti-Trump spin.
I thought fraud in reporting was done for. I was wrong.
The [Jack] Kelley scandal, like the 2003 revelation of Jayson Blair's frauds at the New York Times, disproved my belief that
Stephen Glass's fakes at the New Republic (in the 1990s, when I was the magazine's editor) might be the last. Surely
computer-aided fact-checking would deter fraud, I thought. However, the unmasking of Der Spiegel's erstwhile ace, Claas
Relotius, as a phony on Dec. 20, mere days after he collected his fourth German Reporter Prize, shows yet again that my
hope was naive. Reporters keep inventing stories and getting prizes for them. What's going on?
Der
Spiegel star reporter Claas Relotius fabricated stories for years. The German weekly Der Spiegel, one of the
top-selling publications in Europe, is reeling from a scandal that revealed that a star reporter has reportedly faked stories
for years. Many of the faked stories written by Claas Relotius were centered in the United States or in the Middle
East. So far, Der Spiegel editors said Wednesday, they had found that Relotius "made up stories and invented
protagonists" in at least 14 of the 60 stories examined so far. But they said the investigation is only beginning.
The editors said they were "astounded and sad" by the discovery, which they called "a low point in Der Spiegel's 70-year
history."
Disgraced
German journalist now suspected of charity scam. An award-winning German magazine writer who resigned in
disgrace for making up stories is suspected of embezzling cash he collected on behalf of children orphaned by the war in
Syria, according to his former employer. Der Spiegel said Sunday [12/23/2018] it had uncovered information that Claas
Relotius allegedly solicited contributions after writing an article about Syrian urchins living on the streets of
Turkey — but directed donations to his own bank account.
Fake News, Fake Rednecks.
Award-winning German alleged reporter Claas Relotius — he was named CNN's Journalist of the Year in
2014 — has just been unmasked as a rank fabulist after it was revealed that he fabricated large sections of at
least 14 articles since 2011 — most significantly, a 2017 piece about Trump voters in rural Minnesota that turns
out to have been a largely fact-free hit piece designed to appeal to the confirmation bias of media elites who regard rural
white Americans as hateful, toothless retardates. The article appeared in Der Spiegel — one of
Europe's highest-circulation and most respected publications. With a fact-checking staff of 70, this saga is being
depicted as Europe's biggest media scandal since 1983's "Hitler Diaries" debacle.
Plausible Lies.
The case of Claas Relotius, Der Spiegel and the town of Fergus Falls, Minnesota has become notorious. Der
Spiegel, Europe's most widely-read news source, fired Relotius, one of Germany's most honored journalists, when it came
to light that he had made up facts in a number of articles he wrote for the magazine.
Der
Spiegel to run 23-page special on reporter who faked stories. The German news weekly Der Spiegel is to publish
a 23-page special report on how one of its award-winning reporters faked stories for years and dealt a blow to media
credibility. Claas Relotius, 33, resigned after admitting making up stories and inventing protagonists in more than a
dozen articles in the magazine's print and online editions. Since the scandal was revealed by the magazine on
Wednesday, other mainstream German outlets including Die Welt and Die Zeit, which once used Relotius as a
freelancer, have also begun poring through articles that he wrote for them.
Don't Let the
Media Convince You the USA is Dangerous For Journalists. The narrative began when Time magazine decided to
dedicate its person of the year to "The Guardians," a group of reporters best known by member Jamal Khashoggi, a U.S.
resident murdered by the Saudi Arabian government. Other outlets picked up on Times' lead, as nonprofit Reporters
Without Borders added the U.S. onto its list of countries most deadliest for journalists for the first time ever —
joining Mexico and Syria. Reuters decided to bury the true reason for why the U.S. had an inordinate amount of
journalists die in 2018 in the eight paragraph of its Tuesday report: the tragic slaying of five employees at the Capital
Gazette's offices in Annapolis, Maryland, in June. Two were killed in weather-related incidents.
Time
Magazine and the Manipulation and Abuse of Truth. After taking note of the same thing Scott had
observed — Time had literally called Obama Obi-Wan Kenobi, the heroic Jedi knight from Star Wars,
while disdaining Trump as a demagogue leading a pack of racists and misogynists — I went on to take note of
exactly when this kind of disconnect between Americans and media elites began to seriously surface. I traced it back to
the in-the-day famous speech of President Richard Nixon's number two, Vice President Spiro Agnew. Agnew had ventured
into the American heartland — Des Moines, Iowa — on November 13, 1969.
Electoral
Fraud: the Real Record. When Donald Trump was running for office, he raised the issue of fraudulent votes. As
with everything else Trump has said, it was instantly attacked and ridiculed by the media. Since then, the idea has been
dismissed by MSM journalists who have insisted that there have not been any cases of illegal voting. Recently, though, the
novel possibility of fraudulent votes in favor of a Republican candidate has made the MSM do a 180 while reiterating that such
things have never happened favoring Democratic candidates. As with many other topics, MSM journalists have blatantly lied.
Media
Conventional Wisdom On The Russia Investigation Is Uninformed And Idiotic. Jim VandeHei of Axios claimed to sum
up on Sunday "what we already now know" about Robert Mueller's findings in the Russia probe. His next claim was even
more robust. "What we already now know is highly damning and highly detailed." If you want to — and I
quote — "go deeper," you can click a button that gives you "460 words" of how what we know is highly damning
and highly detailed. It is, of course, not even close to either of those things. But it's worth looking at to see
how some D.C. figures are easily spun into thinking — or claiming to think — that things for which
there is no evidence have "highly detailed" evidence.
Bush
41's death reveals the truth: the only kind of Republicans the media likes are dead ones.
Today we will hear most of the media talk about George H.W. Bush in a flattering manner, as they should. They also
acted as if they loved Reagan and McCain when they died — even as they sought to destroy them when they ran for
office. The playbook is always the same. Democrats, including most of the media, pretend they love Republicans
when they die after they trashed them when they ran and lived.
Pittsburgh - we need to
talk. Just because someone from ABC-TV, NBC-TV or CBS-TV sticks a microphone in your face, and asks your
opinion about the Tree of Life murder, or how you feel about Trump, or the Pirates, or the Steelers, remember, this is still
a free country. You don't have to answer. Most of the time, you will look silly. You will make the news,
and if this is what you want, beware, you will go on record as being a loudmouthed idiot. Even if you speak carefully
and intelligently, know that back in the editing room they can, and do, cut you to pieces, so whatever your message was, it
is no more.
DHS
Secretary Issues Statement, Correcting False Media Accounts at Southern U.S. Border. [Scroll down]
[Quoting Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen] "Fifth, we cannot confirm the backgrounds and identities of all caravan members which
possess a national security and public safety risk to our country. However, at this point we have confirmed that there
are over 600 convicted criminals traveling with the caravan flow. This includes individuals known to law enforcement
for assault, battery, drug crimes, burglary, rape, child abuse and more. This is serious. Additionally, Mexico
has already arrested 100 caravan members for criminal violations in Mexico.["]
Avis
Rental Car Returned With Ballots, Media Narrative Claims 'Suspicious Package'. In what appears to be a massive
cover up, a Democrat, Broward County employee returned a rental car to the Fort Lauderdale Airport with two boxes of
provisional ballots in the trunk. However, the media is not reporting that, but following a "suspicious package"
narrative as the airport was shut down last night after the discovery. Laura Loomer reported images of the boxes and
the Avis employee who found them. The highly leftist Broward County Sheriff's Office shut down a portion of the Fort
Lauderdale airport after the boxes of ballots were reported. They called it a "suspicious package" and brought in the
bomb squad to "investigate," shutting down the airport for hours. Literally every local news media outlet has parroted
the line of the "suspicious package." "Only a few conservative outlets even mentioned that the package was actually two
boxes of provisional ballots from Broward County."
Democrats Freak: Obama Can't Fill
Arena & Loses Control In Wild-Eyed Shrieking Rant. Barack Obama was supposed to be the Democratic messiah,
bringing on the big blue wave. But, the Obama of 2008 and 2012 is gone, and the truth is, he can't fill arenas.
The former president was just caught on video with white hair, sunken eyes, and a shrill voice that often cracked and
stuttered terribly while speaking. Well, we just discovered what Barack and the Democrats are trying so hard to
hide. Something stinks when it comes to Democratic rallies. In fact, there is something they can't deny.
Even their number one guy, Barack Obama, is having a [difficult] time filling up a venue. Instead, the mainstream media
has to take photos at certain vantage points to give the impression there are tens of thousands in attendance.
When
Media Foist False Narratives to Sow Social Discord, They Indeed Are the Enemy of the People. A maniacal dirtbag
murdered eleven Jews in Pittsburgh. In time, perhaps after a decade or two of ACLU appeals, he will be electrocuted, injected,
hanged, or hopefully all three. The dirtbag hated Jews, and he likewise hated President Trump. President Trump responded
to the news immediately with profoundly sensitive and healing words aimed at condemning anti-Semitism and at comforting and consoling
the Jewish community. [...] And then came the sowers of social discord to destroy the moment. The Left Media would not allow the
President that moment to heal and unify. Instantly, they brought in one Left-Democrat anti-Trump "analyst" after another to blame
Mr. Trump for the attack. They never blamed President Jimmy Carter's anti-Jewish rhetoric for the 1977 Brith Sholom Kneseth
Israel synagogue shooting in St. Louis. Nor Bill Clinton for the 1994 Brooklyn Bridge shootings of yeshiva students that
included the murder of Ari Halberstam. Nor Clinton's rhetoric for the 1999 Granada Hills Jewish Community Center shooting in
Los Angeles. Nor Obama for the deadly 2009 Holocaust Museum shooting in Washington, D.C. Nor Obama for the 2014 Overland
Park Jewish Community Center shootings in Kansas City that murdered three. But this time — with the same social dynamics
as the others — they tried blaming the President. By sowing social discord with outright absolute falsehoods at a time that
called for healing, the Left Media indeed were acting as enemy of the people.
Caravan
migrants different, more violent, than previous migrant groups [according to the] U.S. military. To hear the
press and its narrative allies tell it, the Honduras migrant caravan is little more than thousands of mothers and toddlers
spontaneously fleeing violence in their home countries. The flight is little different from that seen in previous
caravans. Any concern about crime or violence is a "scare tactic," or "lying," or "racism," and there's no evidence any
of the migrants are criminals. President Trump's warnings about the matter are simply "factually wrong."
Actually, a different picture is emerging. Specifically, signs are mounting that far from the exodus being a
Madonna-and-child in flip flops narrative, the military-aged unemployed males dominating this wave of caravans are far more
violent than reported. That's not a scare story from some rightwing militia group, but the actual view of the U.S.
military, whose 5,000-plus troops have been dispatched to meet the caravans and keep them from storming the U.S. border and
entering the U.S. illegally as they already did in Mexico. Asked if the dispatch was all a border stunt by a reporter,
Secretary of Defense Gen. Jim Mattis icily replied: "We don't do stunts in this department. Thank you."
Fact-Checkers Without
Evidence. As the media continues its precipitous decline in public approval and credibility, one small bastion
still retains a semi-sacred status: Fact-checkers. Even more than "journalists" fact-checkers claim to be above
the fray, depicting themselves as sticking to the "cold hard facts" while leaving their opinions at the door. Of
course, this is meant to cover up the fact that almost invariably they inject their opinions into various matters while
projecting a false narrative that their work emanates from some higher authority that must be believed, much like a college
professor who thinks he must not be questioned by mere students.
Christina
Blasey Ford's Polygraph Was [Suspicious]. The fact that Christine Blasey Ford's lawyers refused to release the
results of her polygraph exam until the day before her testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee last month caused some
suspicion. And when we finally got a look at them, a lot of Judge Kavanaugh's supporters were confirmed in their
suspicions. [...] Even if Ford's exam had been entirely on the up and up, despite the credence most people give them,
polygraph tests are something of a joke among serious research psychologists. The American Psychological Association
will tell anyone who cares to listen (which unfortunately isn't many) that "most psychologists and other scientists agree
that there is little basis for [their] validity." The APA has such a dim view of the procedure in part because, though
research indicates that a polygraph exam can detect deception better than chance, there's still a significant likelihood of
error. And doing better than flipping a coin isn't all that great when someone's reputation is on the line.
Lawsuit
may help explain remains of 63 fetuses found in Detroit funeral home. When their daughter died 27 minutes after
her birth in December 2014, a Detroit couple donated the infant's remains for medical research. Four years later,
Rachel Brown and Larry Davis don't know what happened to Alayah's tiny body. They're plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed
earlier this year that may help explain how the remains of 63 fetuses were discovered by police Friday [10/19/2018] in
boxes and freezers at Perry Funeral Home at Warren and Trumbull on Detroit's west side.
The Editor says...
Please note that if a baby lived 27 minutes, he or she was no longer a fetus.
Thus the media's description of "63 fetuses" is dishonest.
Nine
Lies the Media Are Telling You About Elizabeth Warren's DNA Test. Spreading lies to benefit the Democrat Party
is what the establishment media do. For example, over the weekend, NBC News fabricated the lie that President Trump
gushed over Confederate General Robert E. Lee. This was a deliberate lie to smear Trump as racist, and it was only
corrected by NBC after the lie had run its course. Over the same weekend, CNN crafted its own lie to make Donald Trump Jr.
look racist. The media lie. And then the media lie some more. And now the media are lying about Sen. Elizabeth
Warren (D-MA) and her debacle of a DNA test. These are lies of omission and commission, but they are still lies because the
media are desperate to mislead and deceive.
Kavanaugh's
confirmation smoked out the journo-activists. "The racist history of Chevy Chase, home to power players like
Brett Kavanaugh," read the headline on a story on the Washington Post on Sept. 29. The hint, of course, is that Kavanaugh
helped make it racist, moved there because it was racist, or helped make it more racist once he was there. "As late as
1976," the Post said, "the New York Times noted that the Chevy Chase Club golf course and country club ... whose members
include Supreme Court nominee Brett M. Kavanaugh and Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. — allowed 'black skinned
members of the diplomatic corps' but not black Americans, inside its doors." But in 1976, neither Roberts nor Kavanaugh
belonged to the club or lived in Washington. Kavanaugh, then aged 11, lived with his parents in Maryland. Neither
lived in Chevy Chase until it became a heavily liberal enclave.
Weather
Channel defends reporter captured swaying in Florence winds as 2 people walk behind him. As Hurricane Storm
Florence lashed through the Carolinas with howling winds and heavy rain, one reporter was captured attempting to keep it
together as winds appeared to lash at him, but was mocked when two people were seen walking behind him with little
difficulty. The viral video, which has more than 13.6 million views, showed Weather Channel correspondent Mike Seidel
in Wilmington, North Carolina, trying to fight the heavy wind as he reported live from the storm on Friday [9/14/2018].
Media
pretend left-wing mobs of protesters aren't really mobs. Journalists spent last week rewriting history as it
happened and denying the thuggery of left-wing protests. It was like watching a reality TV version of "1984."
President Trump helped get the show rolling when he called left-wing protesters "an angry mob" and Republicans and
conservative groups picked up the term. It was repeated in several videos and in a key GOP commercial that highlighted
scenes of violence. The scenes in the commercial included: the rioting and arson that took place protesting
President Trump's inauguration; attacks on Trump campaign events; harassment of members of Congress; and protesters pounding
on the Supreme Court doors to object to the Senate confirmation of now-Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. This was
all more than the media could stand and they spent the week trying to disprove reality.
Confirmation
bias: Brett Kavanaugh and the major media's worst moment. We are now at the unsuccessful conclusion of a
four-week-long effort by certain media organizations to prove Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh is a violent sexual
predator and a lying alcoholic. The reckless and grossly irresponsible scramble by the New Yorker, NBC News, the New
York Times, and others to make Kavanaugh into a monster produced some of the worst journalism of the Trump era to
date — and that's a pretty high bar. There were plenty of minor fouls, including when the Times assigned a
news story on Kavanaugh to a magazine opinion writer who openly opposed his nomination. Others were much greater,
including when NBC published an anonymously written letter alleging (with zero corroboration) that Kavanaugh was observed by
an anonymous woman in 1998 to have pushed another anonymous woman.
Evil,
Disgusting USA Today Article Hideously Lies About Judge Kavanaugh. A USA Today hit piece, dated September 29,
insinuated Brett Kavanaugh was a child molester. The disgusting, outrageous attacks by the leftist media have reached a
new low, even for them. The title of the article is: USA Today hit piece says Kavanaugh should 'stay off
basketball courts when kids are around'. The evil author is Donovan Slack. He actually put his name on the
piece accusing the judge of being a pedophile. Outside of murder, that was the only thing left to the hideous leftists
in the media. This is literally a replay of the Salem Witch Trials. They are destroying him as much as anyone
they might like to kill. They edited out several paragraphs but the entire article should have been trashed with an
apology. The article was presented as news, not opinion, and seemed to destroy his reputation and his ability to coach
basketball.
NY
Times removes key language helpful to Kavanaugh from article about Yale accuser Ramirez. On Sunday night,
September 23, 2018, The New Yorker published an article about accusations by Deborah Ramirez, a former Yale classmate of
Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. The authors were Ronan Farrow and Jane Meyer. The New Yorker article
noted, deep into the article, that Ramirez's accusations were not corroborated by any witnesses with first hand knowledge,
and that Ramirez herself had gaps in memory that were cleared up only after 6 days of thinking about it and consulting
with lawyers. The NY Times covered the story, and had language in its September 23 about Ford testifying that was
extremely helpful to Kavanaugh's defense. The language was added in an evening edit.
Character
Assassins in the Fake News Media. The Left's lack of respect for democratic principles, for political "others,"
their readiness to employ gutter tactics and mangle the truth, has spread from the Communist fringe publications of the
1960s — like The Nation, and the Daily Worker — to so-called mainstream publications like
the Huffington Post, the New York Times, and the Washington Post.
New
Yorker Publishes Accusation Containing ZERO Evidence to Support, and 100% of Evidence To Refute. [Scroll
down] Really, no need to go further. Why? Because despite their search, and discussions with "dozens" of
potential witnesses... "The magazine contacted several dozen classmates of Ramirez and Kavanaugh regarding the
incident"[. T]he New Yorker was unable to find a single witness to corroborate the story being made by the
accuser. None. Not a single confirming witness to back up the claim.
Brett
Kavanaugh Defies 'Grotesque Character Assassination' from the Left. Supreme Court Nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh
responded to the latest allegations of sexual misconduct on Monday [9/24/2018] by denouncing them as smears. "These are
smears, pure and simple. And they debase our public discourse," he wrote in a letter to the Senate Judiciary
Committee. "But they are also a threat to any man or woman who wishes to serve our country. Such grotesque and
obvious character assassination — if allowed to succeed — will dissuade competent and good people of
all political persuasions from service." Kavanuagh's letter expressed frustration with his delayed confirmation vote
despite repeating his willingness to testify about the accusations from Christine Ford and a second "uncorroborated" report
in the New Yorker.
This
Kavanaugh furor: How to execute an attempted political homicide. As soon as Judge Brett Kavanaugh's
once-anonymous accuser started stalling for time over testifying, you knew another sexual assault allegation was in the
works. Sure enough, a New Yorker story dropped Sunday night, when news competition would be minimal. It's
possible we'll have yet another tardy "revelation" before Thursday's scheduled appearances before the Senate Judiciary
Committee, so desperate are opponents of the judge and President Trump.
Media Continues Its
Slow Suicide. After reviewing last week's news coverage, I would encourage President Trump to come up
with a more accurate taunt than "fake news." Maybe "garbage news." [...] But "fake news" is tame in light of the
media's misleading, destructive, and willfully ignorant reporting last week that was intended further to inflame a divided
body politic. Some of the lowlights featured MSNBC morning host Joe Scarborough, claiming Trump has done more damage
to the country than the 9/11 terrorists; the editorial board of a major newspaper blaming Trump for Hurricane Florence;
the wholesale acceptance of a highly flawed paper about hurricane deaths used to bash the president; and a despicable
crusade not just to quash Brett Kavanaugh's appointment to the Supreme Court, but to destroy his reputation and damage
his young family.
The
New York Times issues major correction to Kavanaugh sexual assault story. It's one thing to misspell a name or
get a specific date wrong. It's another thing entirely to report that a supposed witness to a sexual assault says he
remembers it happening when he has said the exact opposite. For an example of the latter, we turn to the New York Times,
which published a report Tuesday titled, "Christine Blasey Ford Wants F.B.I. to Investigate Kavanaugh Before She Testifies."
Egg
on Their Faces: New York Times Retracts False Nikki Haley Smear. On Thursday [9/13/2018], the New York
Times — America's newspaper of record — published a disgusting false smear against U.S. Ambassador
to the UN Nikki Haley. The original article suggested Haley was responsible for spending $52,701 on curtains for the UN
ambassador's house in New York City, when in reality the decision to purchase the curtains was made under former president
Barack Obama. The Times appended a correction at the top of the article, altered the headline, and removed the
photo of Nikki Haley. "Nikki Haley's View of New York Is Priceless. Her New Curtains? $52,701." the original
headline screamed, complete with a featured picture of Haley at the United Nations. The original version of the article
is unavailable, but a screenshot captured by the Washington Post's Aaron Blake revealed that the Times had
substantially altered the article after receiving hefty criticism.
Fake News collapses
on NYT. The Obama administration ordered $52,701 worth of curtains for the apartment the U.S. ambassador to the
United Nations. To put that in perspective, the West Virginia Legislature impeached the entire state Supreme Court for
wasting $32,000 to buy a couch. So how did the New York Times report this Obama scandal? "Nikki Haley's View of
New York Is Priceless. Her Curtains? $52,701." After Fox News pointed out the headline drapes do not match
the rug of facts, the Times demoted the headline to "State Department Spent $52,701 on Curtains for Residence of U.N.
Envoy." Nope, nope, nope. Nikki Haley did not build this. Obama did.
New
York Times Spreads Fake News About Nikki Haley's $52,701 Curtains. A New York Times headline attacks UN
Ambassador Nikki Haley's extravagant curtains, even though the Obama administration ordered them in 2016. The fake news
headline snarks, "Nikki Haley's View of New York Is Priceless. Her Curtains? $52,701." [...] The word "spent" is
crucial, however, because after five whole paragraphs describing Haley's "spectacular views" in her leased $58,000 a month
"full-floor penthouse, with handsome hardwood floors covering large open spaces stretching nearly 6,000 square feet," the
Times at long last reveals the truth: The Obama administration ordered those $52,701
curtains. What's more the Obama administration chose the $58,000 per month penthouse.
NYT
smears Nikki Haley over Obama's $53,000 UN curtains purchase. Lacking a catch of late, the New York Times
decided to pull a Scott Pruitt on United Nations ambassador Nikki Haley, accusing her of being Extravagance Woman, a regular
Stateside Imelda, based on a $53,000 purchase of customized and mechanized curtains for her United Nations apartment. [...]
Turns out the fancy curtain order was the work of Samantha Power, President Obama's former U.N. ambassador, who, when she
wasn't busy unmasking Americans to learn all about what was going on in the Trump campaign (or maybe handing her password
out, given the quantity of such unmaskings under her name), was also busy getting the decorating in — status
stuff, like self-opening curtains, the better to impress the Harvard and NGO crowds who undoubtedly would come by to
visit. And it was President Obama who approved the purchase.
The Truth About TIME's 'Underpaid
Teachers' Story. "I Work 3 Jobs And Donate Blood Plasma to Pay the Bills. This Is What It's Like to Be a
Teacher in America," reads the cover of TIME Magazine this week — and the story is going viral. I haven't
been able to scroll through a social media feed without seeing someone linking to the article — which features the
stories of a handful of allegedly struggling teachers. [...] While I'm all for paying certain teachers more, TIME's piece
doesn't make a convincing case for that. In fact, the TIME article doesn't do anything other than prove life is hard,
given that all of the teachers profiled in the piece earn incomes above that of the average American.
Media
pounce on conservatives and weaponize bias against Trump. Anti-Trump news organizations continued to attack the
president this past week on many fronts, including for what CNN Senior Political Analyst John Avlon called "a real culture of
corruption." In reality, Avlon should have been describing the state of journalism. CNN, that stalwart of James Earl
Jones voiceovers, has no room to point fingers. It got caught believing another phony story about President Trump and
is too stubborn and woke to admit it. (Sort of like when three CNN investigative journalists had to resign in 2017, except
then the network admitted they were wrong.) Meanwhile, NBC is facing allegations from a former top producer that executives
actively interfered in reporting on allegations of sexual misconduct against Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein. And The New York
Times has become increasingly obvious about the word play it injects into news stories, so its left-wing agenda remains intact.
Ohr
speaks! (Behind closed doors). You can almost smell the fear in the Get Trump camp that Bruce Ohr might be
the thread that could be pulled to unravel the conspiracy of high-ranking officials to spy on the Trump campaign and then,
after the election, put into action the "insurance policy" Peter Strzok mentioned to his mistress (and co-worker) Lisa Page
in an August 2016 text message, to remove a duly elected president from office. The New York Times, which serves as a
pilot fish for the rest of the media, has been working hard to minimize the damage he might do. On August 17, as
Ohr's name was being introduced to inhabitants of the MSM bubble thanks to a threat by President Trump to remove his security
clearance, the Times outright lied about his position in the Department of Justice, calling him a "midlevel" official in the
DOJ. This lie was picked up and repeated in many other articles and was used on cable news reports extensively,
thereby falsely branding him as a minor player caught up and persecuted by Trump and anyone else paying attention.
South
Africans Push Back Against Lying American Media — White Farmers Getting Killed Daily. Residents of
South Africa are creating videos backing up US President Donald Trump's claims that white farmers in South Africa are being
murdered. In riveting firsthand testimony uploaded to Twitter Monday [8/27/2018], several South Africans pushed back
against the mainstream media, testifying violence against whites is on the rise.
Charlottesville
and Masked Antifa: The Fake News Media as Enemy of the People. By now we all know that the White Racist
Nazis who were expected in their thousands by the Seedier Media arrived few in number, but a ton of masked Antifa Nazis
showed up. To the degree (i) that "The People" benefit when White Racist Nazis remain few in number; (ii) that "The
People" are hurt when the media go out of their way to inflate the numbers of White Racist Nazis in a self-serving
coordinated media frenzy to increase numbers of White Racist Nazi demonstrators for more interesting television that leads to
better ratings and increased advertising revenue; and (iii) that such fake news build-ups for days leading up to the
Charlottesville anniversary actually threaten to draw more White Racist Nazis and to threaten the civil order... the Fake
News Media indeed proved themselves to be the Enemy of the People.
No
sympathy for a lying press. It's difficult to take the media's claims about attacks on the press seriously when
they're constantly gaslighting the country. [...] Over and over again the press asserts that something is true, even though
you saw with your own eyes that it's not.
The
Media Are Hiding Their Knowledge and Duplicity. We shared a discussion thread several months ago about how the
media are enmeshed within the story of the DOJ and FBI corruption. However, only recently did we discover the media
engagements were not just pervasive, they were/are participatory. As a consequence the same media cannot reasonably
report on any aspect of the story without exposing their own duplicity; their only choice is to double down on lies they
helped create and promote.
Journalists
used to fight fake news; today they pretend it doesn't exist. The credibility of newspapers and of journalism
in general depend on our ability to get the story right in the first place, and to admit our mistakes promptly in the second
place. [...] Unfortunately, it seems that some big-name journalists today consider themselves and their chosen profession
above reproach. When President Trump calls them out for publishing fake news, they merely put their thumbs in their
ears and shout back petulantly "NOT FAKE NOT FAKE!" no matter how obvious it is to an objective observer that it was
indeed fake. A prime example of that occurred last Sunday morning when President Trump's tweet about the Trump Tower
meeting held by Don Jr. in 2016 was widely trumpeted as some kind of new (and damning) revelation when actually the
president had said the exact same thing (in virtually the same words) a year earlier.
Levin:
'The media won't address its own unprofessionalism'. Thursday [8/2/2018] on the radio, LevinTV host Mark Levin
called out the media for reporting more on themselves than on legitimate news, and claiming that they are "under attack."
"The media keep reporting on the media, have you noticed that? ... The media have abandoned a pretense of seeking objectivity
for ideological activism, progressivism ... they're devouring what they self-servingly claim to defend," Levin said.
[Audio clip]
The
media whips up hatred among classes, races, religions, and exactly two sexes.
• The media constantly publish stories showing that white people are racist. In the past 48 hours alone, the
New York Times has published stories showing that white people are racist in hotels and at public swimming pools. [...] Nearly every day, the
media write an article that reads, "White people are racist in [kind of place or circumstance]." This repeated emphasis whips up
racial resentment and encourages violence against white people.
• Not a day goes by without some gleeful account of how the non-white population of America is increasing, eagerly looking forward
to the day when whites are in the minority. This "in your face, white people!" mentality stirs up understandable resentment among white Americans.
• We are constantly told by the media to hate the rich, that if they have a lot of money, they must not have earned it legitimately,
that "their" money should be "our" money. The resentment built up by this kind of storyline encourages lawmakers to enact theft by higher taxation.
• Women are constantly told that most men are rapists or harassers who don't respect them. Women are encouraged to turn against
men and see rape in every dorm room and every janitor closet.
• We are repeatedly told that the police are racist.
Freeing
People from Left-Wing Lies. Because real people don't tell big lies, they assume that others won't,
either. Hence, when Hitler, or the WaPo, repeats big lies over and over, people tend to end up believing them so long
as they don't hear any contradictory voices. That's why so many Americans think abortion is legal only in the first
trimester or for the hard cases when in fact it's legal for any reason at any time during a pregnancy. That's why so
many Americans think Trump somehow colluded with Russia even though there is not a shred of evidence to indicate that.
That's why so few Americans know that Carter Page, the supposed Russian spy targeted by the FISA warrant, helped the FBI
sting to capture Russian spies in 2013. Clearly, the media have to work hard to hide that from the bubble people they're
trying to fool. That's why few Democratic voters know that the NYT has armed guards to protect its newsroom even as it
says making it harder for average citizens to have guns is a good thing.
The truth about 'Fake News'.
Janet Cooke is a prime example of why the Pulitzer Prize has essentially become worthless. She won a Pulitzer Prize in
1981 for a sob story written for The Washington Post, but the story was later discovered to have been completely
fabricated. While Cooke subsequently returned the Pulitzer, she remains the only one who has. Flash back to the
New York Times Moscow correspondent reporter Walter Duranty, who won a Pulitzer in 1932 for a series of reports about the
Soviet Union, 11 of them were published in June 1931.and completely denied the widespread famine (1932-1933) in the USSR,
most particularly the mass starvation in Ukraine.
Deep Fake News. The
Brookings Institution warns that "fact checking" will become a lot harder in the 21st century as artificial intelligence
becomes better at producing "deep fake news" creating counterfeits so good they are difficult to distinguish from the Real
McCoy. "Because the algorithms that generate the fakes continuously learn how to more effectively replicate the
appearance of reality, deep fakes cannot easily be detected by other algorithms — indeed, in the case of generative
adversarial networks, the algorithm works by getting really good at fooling itself." The technology to fake videos,
photographs and sound clips is now so good even Hollywood is increasingly using digital actors. Moreover artificial
intelligence can weave these fakes into a superficially self-consistent universe of lies creating a false narrative whose
fraudulence can only be exposed by painstaking comparison to reality.
Mainstream Media
On Their Last Legs. What happens when the entire industry that is devoted to educating the public is doing so
with a clear political slant, despite their claims of objectivity? What ensues is an absolute lack of trust, and the
ensuing panic from those that are most responsible for it. You see more and more hands grasping for fewer straws.
You get the people who are supposed to be informing the republic choosing to denigrate and blatantly insult the American
public, because they've lost their ability to do what they should be doing.
The Next American Revolution:
#WalkAway. My first inkling that Donald Trump might actually become President came about mid-evening on election
night, 2016, when I switched to MSNBC to look at that infallible barometer of Republican success at the ballot box, the
expressions of the "journalists" reporting the returns. The first face I saw was that of Chuck Todd, who was frowning
at a map of Wisconsin and maundering about Milwaukee. [...] His fear was well-founded. Those Milwaukee precincts were
emblematic of a nationwide phenomenon that contributed in no small part to Trump's victory — African-American
enthusiasm for Hillary Clinton was tepid at best. Both the Democrats and the "news" media have ignored this reality.
Their willful ignorance allows them to claim, as the brainiacs at Vox put it, "Trump won because of racial resentment."
Never mind that Hillary Clinton is conspicuously caucasian and that white turnout has remained relatively stable since 2004.
Mainstream
Media Blame Donald Trump for Maryland Newspaper Shooter. Several members of the mainstream media blamed
President Donald Trump for a suspect who allegedly killed five journalists on Thursday [6/28/2018] and reportedly had a
longstanding dispute with the newspaper dating back to before Trump even declared his candidacy for the Oval Office.
Per several reports, authorities late Thursday identified [...] the shooter who allegedly opened fire on the news staff of
Maryland's The Capital-Gazette newspaper. It came out shortly thereafter that [he] had a longstanding battle
with the newspaper dating back nearly a decade [...]
Trump
[is] Blamed for Death of Reporters. Did Media Blame Obama for Cop Killers? A man with a long-standing
beef against the Annapolis, Maryland, newspaper Capital Gazette entered the paper's headquarters with a shotgun and murdered
five staffers. It represents the deadliest attack on U.S. reporters in modern history. Before learning about the
suspect's mental issues and his long-standing feud with the newspaper, some in the media blamed President Donald Trump.
After all, critics said, Trump routinely denounces "fake news" as an existential threat to our republic. Connect the
dots, they said. Blame Trump! CNN aired a montage of Trump's attacks on the media. Rob Cox, a Reuters
editor, tweeted: "This is what happens when @RealDonaldTrump calls journalists the enemy of the people. Blood is
on your hands, Mr. President." Another reporter, who later resigned, even falsely tweeted that the shooter was
wearing a MAGA cap. How do you get that wrong?
Is the
First Amendment an Excuse for SLOPPY, AWFUL Journalism? As most people know, once speech is "constitutionalized"
by discussing public figures, public officials or matters of public concern, the aggrieved party must prove that the
publication was issued with "actual malice", defined as "knowing falsity or reckless disregard for the truth."
Understanding the "knowing falsity" prong is simple. If a publication invented a defamatory allegation out of thin
air, they're likely to be ruled against. Most media entities in that situation will argue in court that the statement
isn't really defamatory or isn't really about the complainant. More often than not when the press loses attempts to
have a case dismissed on those grounds they write a check to make the problem go away. The "reckless disregard" prong
is much more difficult to navigate.
Journalists
'Fraudulently' Posed as Translators at Migrant Center, Say Feds. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
officials said "several journalists" claimed to be translators in order to gain access to illegal immigrants being processed
by Border Patrol agents after they illegally crossed the border from Mexico. Two were identified as journalists by officials
and turned away. However, a third successfully gained entry on Tuesday [6/26/2018] and made their way "fraudulently" into
the processing center during a time scheduled for attorney-client privileged meetings, CBP officials stated.
Reporter
resigns after false tweet that Maryland shooting suspect had MAGA hat. A reporter in Springfield, Mass.,
resigned from his job Friday [6/29/2018] after posting a Twitter message falsely stating that Maryland shooting suspect
Jarrod Ramos had brought a "Make America Great Again" hat to the office of the Capital Gazette. Conor Berry, who wrote
for the Republican, tweeted an image of a MAGA hat Thursday, and suggested that Ramos had left it behind at the Gazette
office after allegedly killing five Gazette employees.
The Editor says...
The only thing missing from this story is a follow-up article two days later in which the central figure says, "Can't you
take a joke?" But there's nothing in the initial coverage of this story that would indicate Mr. Ramos
was trying to be funny. Well, good luck in the used car business. I mean, now that you're washed up
in journalism, what else can you do with a journalism degree?
Reuters
editor apologizes, could be disciplined after blaming Capital Gazette shooting on Trump. A top editor at
Reuters apologized on Thursday night [6/28/2018] after blaming President Trump for the deadly Capital Gazette shooting in a
now-deleted tweet that was sent during a "state of emotional distress," but he might still be disciplined by the
international news service. Reuters Breakingviews Editor Rob Cox admitted that he "responded emotionally and
inappropriately" after being called out for jumping to conclusions prior to the facts emerging. Police said the
suspected gunman, eventually identified as Jarrod W. Ramos, targeted the newspaper after a lengthy feud regarding a 2012
defamation lawsuit. "This is what happens when [President] Trump calls journalists the enemy of the people. Blood
is on your hands, Mr. President. Save your thoughts and prayers for your empty soul," Cox wrote in the deleted
tweet, according to TheWrap.
Reporter Who
Falsely Claimed Annapolis Shooter Wore MAGA Hat Resigns. A reporter at a Massachusetts-based newspaper resigned
Friday [6/29/2018] after falsely claiming in a tweet Thursday that the man who killed five employees at the Capital Gazzete
newspaper left a "Make America Great Again" hat at the crime scene. "Shooter who killed 4 people at Annapolis newspaper
dropped his #MAGA hat on newsroom floor before opening fire," Conor Berry, a reporter at The Republican in Springfield,
Mass., wrote in a now-deleted tweet.
Massachusetts
Reporter Resigns After Suggesting Killer Was Trump Supporter. A Massachusetts newspaper reporter has resigned
after falsely suggesting the perpetrator of the deadly shooting at a Maryland newspaper was wearing a President Donald
Trump-inspired "Make America Great Again" hat. The Republican newspaper in Springfield reports Conor Berry has
apologized for tarnishing the "good work of fair-minded journalists everywhere" in his Friday resignation letter. Berry
tweeted an image of the familiar red hat and suggested 38-year-old Jarrod Ramos had dropped a similar one on The Capital
Gazette's newsroom floor before opening fire and killing five people Thursday. The tweet has since been taken down.
Levin:
The media 'create their own reality'. LevinTV host Mark Levin began his radio show Friday evening [6/22/2018] discussing
how the media have inserted ideological progressivism into their news reporting. "They create their own reality. And in
this case, it's a progressive reality," Levin said of the media. "And they push it out as news." He recommended the book
The Image: A Guide to Pseudo-Events in America, by the late historian Daniel Boorstin, to explain how the news media
attempt to indoctrinate the public.
7
Recent Lies From Media On Emotion-Driven Immigration Debate. Democrats and the mainstream media continued to
destroy any remaining credibility they have left with their recent hysteria surrounding the debate on illegal immigration as
they pushed lie after lie in their attempts to emotionally manipulate voters. Before jumping into the lies and false
information that the media and Democrats have injected into the American public, it's important to note the timeline of
events that led up to the creation of this current news cycle. The current news cycle on the poor treatment of
illegal immigrants began in late May when people like former Obama speechwriter Jon Favreau tweeted out an article from 2014
and falsely insinuated that it was the Trump administration that was responsible for it.
Lying
Democrat, Lying MSM on the Border Crisis. The entire crisis is a lie. The media is lying! [...] NBC News
is reporting nothing but fake news, claiming the President has caused a crisis at the border. There is a crisis but it
is because 50,000 illegal aliens are caught coming through each month and that doesn't count all the illegals not
caught. Tens of thousands of children as young as 4 years of age are being sent alone with cartels by their
abusive parents.
Fake
News and Immigration. Unfortunately, Fake News is alive and all too well. This was witnessed in spades
this past week as the Fake News media lied through its fangs about the president on immigration. The Fake Newsies, at
least 90% of whom are Democratic Party operatives, waxed hysteria over the separation of Hispanic children from their
immigrant parents, i.e. those who entered America illegally through the southern border. Of course, the blame for all
of this was laid at the feet of the president, who was excoriated by his political enemies in Washington D.C. and their
apologists and fellow partisans in the Fake News industry for his "zero tolerance" policy. By now, any remotely honest
observer of the political scene should know that the truth is profoundly otherwise than what fake journalists and
commentators would have us think.
Thoughts
on Crying Babies, Dying Babies, and Media Deception. The technique is proven and effective. Put a moving,
highly effective, propagandistic photo on the front page (or cover) of your story. Cause a moral outrage in the
public. Then, several days (or even weeks) later, print a retraction somewhere in the middle of your publication where
few will find it: "We regret publishing a picture with a misleading caption." It works like a charm!
Here
Are The Photos Of Obama's Illegal Immigrant Detention Facilities The Media Won't Show You. The media and
political class become more and more outraged over the Trump administration's decision to detain and prosecute immigrants
illegally crossing the border. Lost in the debate is any acknowledgment that President Obama's administration also used
detention facilities. Current U.S. immigration laws, when enforced, have the consequence of temporarily separating
adults who arrive with children into separate detention facilities in order to prosecute the adults. The policy of
prosecuting immigrants for crossing the border illegally has been in place for multiple administrations. The Obama
administration prosecuted half a million illegal immigrants and similarly separated families in the process. So did the
Bush administration.
Trump
Speaks, The Media Lies, And The Artist Of The Deal Makes His Move. The media lies. That's why there are
sites like RedState. If you could simply turn on the television and trust what you heard, we would be
unnecessary. The same goes for much of the supposed news sources online. For examples of this, look no further
than coverage of the border family separation issue. Among the mainstream news organizations, there seems to be no
adherence to any notion of truth; there is only the media against Trump, which is oftentimes the media against truth.
No child should
be used as a protest prop. Actor Ron Perlman earned nearly 8,000 retweets when he posted a picture of a small
crying child in a cage with the words "Trump, Sessions, McConnell, Ryan, this is on YOU!" When multiple people responded
with a link to Snopes informing him that the photo was a fake, and actually of a child at a protest, Perlman tweeted
back: "Maybe it's you! Maybe you're fake." The photo told a story he wanted to tell, and the fact that it
wasn't real was irrelevant. As of Thursday, the photo remained up on Perlman's page. It's what used to be called
"fake but accurate" but today goes by President Trump's preferred term, "fake news." It's just too good to check.
IG
Report: FBI Officials Accepted Bribes From Media. On Page Xii of the IG report the Department of Justice
Office of Inspector General (DOJ-OIG) highlights numerous FBI officials who accepted bribes from multiple media outlets
including: "tickets to sporting events", "golf outings", "drinks and meals" as well as exclusive invitations and admission to
"nonpublic social events".
50
Media Mistakes in the Trump Era: The Definitive List. We the media have "fact-checked" President Trump
like we have fact-checked no other human being on the planet — and he's certainly given us plenty to write
about. That's probably why it's so easy to find lists enumerating and examining his mistakes, missteps and "lies."
Our repeat mistakes involve declaring that Trump's claims are "lies" when they are matters of opinion, or when the truth
between conflicting sources is unknowable; taking Trump's statements and events out of context; reporting secondhand accounts
against Trump without attribution as if they're established fact; relying on untruthful, conflicted sources; and presenting
reporter opinions in news stories — without labeling them as opinions.
As
Snopes 'Debunks' Child Trafficking Camp, 160 Kids as Young as 3 Rescued in Georgia. A massive sting operation
carried out by the FBI in metro Atlanta captured dozens of child traffickers and rescued 160 children who had been forced
into sex slavery by their captors. This news comes as Snopes and the other ostensible arbiters of truth distort
information claiming that similar trafficking is taking place in Arizona. Illustrating the massive scope of the sting,
called Operation Safe Summer, it was a collaborative effort between the FBI and 38 other law enforcement agencies from six
metro counties.
Bay of Pics: Media
fakery targets Trump with photos of Obama-era child trafficking. Over the Memorial Day weekend, photos of
Central American children at a U.S. holding facility began to appear online. Democrats and their media allies quickly
hailed the pics as the latest exhibit of anti-Trump hysteria. "Look at these photos," Linda Sarsour tweeted.
"Speechless," tweeted Antonio Villaraigosa, former Los Angeles mayor and candidate for governor of California. "This is
not who we are as a nation." [...] Trouble was, the story was from 2014, long before the Trump administration.
Likewise, As Saagar Enjeti noted in the Daily Caller, the detention center photos "stem from a 2014 Arizona Central
story showing migrant children in steel cages. The cages were implemented at the height of the Central American migrant
crisis under the Obama administration."
Left
buys into fake news about Martha Stewart refusing Trump pardon. So did Martha Stewart refuse President Trump's
pardon of her, on a maliciously prosecuted insider stock trading case, based on her progressive views? Nope, not to
anyone's knowledge. But a satirical news site put that out there and sure enough, out on Twitter and elsewhere, much of
the left bit into the fake news and passed it around. Obviously, the satirists knew the left would believe it.
Did the
Feds Lose 1,475 Migrant Children? That's what you would conclude from this USA Today opinion piece
headlined, "The feds lost — yes, lost — 1,475 migrant children." It's a piece that's a pretty good
example of how "fake news" works — there's some factual basis for the claim, but it's exaggerated or misunderstood,
and then fed into the maw of the perpetual outrage cycle, in this case about the alleged extreme carelessness and heartlessness
of the Trump administration toward migrant children. Some background: As we all know, in recent years there has been
a flood of "unaccompanied children" (UAC) showing up at the border. The U.S. government attempts to unite UAC with a
parent or close relative in the U.S. The HHS program to do this is longstanding and long pre-dated the Trump
administration. Given the size of the migrant flow, the scale of this task is enormous.
Media
Spreads Two New Lies Aimed At Smearing ICE, Trump. Multiple journalists, activists, and former Obama
administration officials spread blatant falsehoods during Memorial Day weekend aimed at smearing Immigration and Customs
Enforcement (ICE) and the Trump administration. The first false claim involved a news report showing photos of children
in detention centers lying on floors that CNN's Hadas Gold, former Obama official Jon Favreau, Shaun King, and Linda Sarsour
all shared and promoted as being recent when, in fact, the photos were from 2014, during the Obama administration.
The
Latest Whopper — The FBI Was Actually Trying to 'Protect Trump'. The Deep State has been weaving its
own tangled web of Russian collusion for the past two years beginning with Russia supposedly hacking the 2016 election,
creating the electoral outcome they desired. It has since morphed into Trump colluding with the Russians, despite zero
proof on the one-year anniversary of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's free-for-all investigation by his merry band of partisan
Democrats. It's now to the point that Mueller's team is investigating anyone in Trump's circle who ever ate a bowl of
borscht or drank a sip of Russian vodka. At a time when this couldn't get any more ridiculous, look no further than the
Washington Post for a version of "can you top this?"
Who's An Animal?
Scarcely a day goes by without the news media lying about the president and his administration. No wonder trust in the press
is at an all-time low. It should be.
Why the
left buys into every anti-Israel smear. Eight armed Hamas terrorists fought Israeli troops last Monday
[5/14/2018]. All were killed — then counted in the day's death toll of "60 protesters." Hamas itself
identified 50 of the 60 "martyrs" as Hamas members and admitted to "terminological deception," because it was deploying
"peaceful resistance bolstered by a military force." The widespread condemnations of Israel caused by characterizing
those 50 violent fence-invaders as "peaceful" suggests how Palestinians are playing so many for dupes. Reporters love
playing the "peaceful, oppressed protesters-of-color" against "the armed, white, persecuting soldiers" card (even though there
are many dark-skinned Israelis and light-skinned Palestinians; the conflict is national not racial). Images of flak-jacketed
Israeli soldiers and injured Palestinians trigger waves of simplistic stereotypes. Suddenly, the Palestinians are Martin
Luther King and Mahatma Gandhi and Black Lives Matter all in one.
Liberal
Lies And Slanders Are A Slippery Slope To Trouble. [Scroll down] It's a bad faith strawman strategy, and
it often manifests itself in the New Obtuseness, the stubborn insistence that what someone just said is something entirely
different than what he actually said. It's basically fancy lying. The New Obtuseness was in full effect recently
when Trump called MS-13 dirtbags "animals." Despite the video of him discussing these evil gangbanging scum, the liberals and
their media windowlickers insisted that he was calling all illegal aliens "animals." And they knew it wasn't true —
they just lied, knowingly and intentionally. They do it all the time. We, presumably, are supposed to disbelieve
our own lying eyes and ears.
Anatomy
of a Smear: How the Media Created a Malicious Lie About Trump's 'Animals' Comment. On Wednesday afternoon
[5/16/2018], President Donald Trump hosted a "California sanctuary state roundtable" discussion at the White House.
Infamously, he referred to violent MS-13 gang members as "animals." Americans wouldn't get that impression from reading
Thursday's headlines, however. "Trump Calls Some Unauthorized Immigrants 'Animals' in Rant," screamed The New York
Times's Julie Hirschfeld Davis. Her article referenced MS-13 only once, buried as an aside in the third paragraph:
"He exhorted his administration to 'do much better' in keeping out undesirable people, including members of transnational gangs
like MS-13." USA TODAY ran with the headline "Trump ramps up rhetoric on undocumented immigrants: 'These aren't
people. These are animals.'" To their credit, Gregory Corte and Alan Gomez included a bit more context than The
New York Times did. Even so, MS-13 did not come up until the fourth paragraph, and the opening sentence suggested that
the president was "calling undocumented immigrants 'animals.'"
CNN
Says There Have Been 22 School Shootings This Year. That's A Lie. CNN used the following parameters for
their count: • A shooting that involved at least one person being shot (not including the shooter)
• A shooting that occurred on school grounds • We included grades K through
college/university level • We included gang violence, fights and domestic violence •
We included accidental discharge of a firearm as long as the first two parameters are met So, in other words, not
mass shootings; not even purposeful shootings; not even shootings involving children. If a gang member shot another
gang member on school grounds during the summer, this would count as a school shooting. If a wife shot a husband at a
school, they counted it.
White
House Correspondents' Association Exposed Regularly Spends About 85% of WHCD Revenue on Annual Party, Not Scholarships. The
White House Correspondents' Association (WHCA) has long-cited its scholarships for aspiring journalists to justify the tax-exempt charitable
status of its blow-out, televised annual dinner, but only a small fraction of the IRS-designated 501(c)(3) organization's fundraising is
awarded to students. Last year, just 13.4 percent of the White House Correspondents' Dinner's revenue went to scholarships.
Drew Cloud Is a
Well-Known Expert on Student Loans. One Problem: He's Not Real. Drew Cloud is everywhere. The
self-described journalist who specializes in student-loan debt has been quoted in major news outlets, including The
Washington Post, The Boston Globe,, and CNBC, and is a fixture in the smaller, specialized blogosphere of
student debt. [...] After The Chronicle spent more than a week trying to verify Cloud's existence, the company
that owns The Student Loan Report confirmed that Cloud was fake. "Drew Cloud is a pseudonym that a diverse group
of authors at Student Loan Report, LLC use to share experiences and information related to the challenges college students
face with funding their education," wrote Nate Matherson, CEO of LendEDU. Before that admission, however, Cloud had
corresponded at length with many journalists, pitching them stories and offering email interviews, many of which were published.
Fake
News Takes Down Another Good Man: Dr. Ronny Jackson Resigns as White House Doctor After Liberal Lies.
Democrat Senator Jon Tester led the charge last week spreading false rumors against Trump VA pick Admiral Ronny Jackson.
Tester played point man to smear and slander Admiral Jackson with false allegations of inappropriate behavior. Admiral
Jackson withdrew his nomination after the false allegations were released and shared widely by the liberal mainstream
media. The Secret Service later came out and said the allegations were completely false.
Who Was
Worse — Michelle Wolf or Her Audience? [Scroll down] It's the Golden Age of Leaking, not
Journalism. [...] The role of the press in the whole Christopher Steele dossier business would simply be nauseating if it
weren't sinister. When the full story of the suborning of the FISA court in an attempt to bring down a sitting
president is finally fully revealed, the despicable role of the press, how they allowed themselves to be used, even
encouraged it, will be uncomfortably evident.
The
New York Times' Hatchet Job On Devin Nunes Is Riddled With Errors. Jason Zengerle publicly announced his
profile of Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., in today's [4/29/2018] New York Times Sunday Magazine with the snarky
tweet, "My latest for the @NYTmag on Devin Nunes, who's been propagating, not to mention falling for, conspiracy theories
since before the Deep State was even in a gleam in Donald Trump's eye." It's an accurate summation of the hit he
attempted to place on Nunes, the chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI). The only
problem is the case he attempts to make is riddled with errors and full of embarrassing and deliberate material omissions.
Leftist
Propaganda Thwarts Unity. In Nazi Germany, the people believed, right up to the bitter end, that they were going to
win the war. They did so because all the news they got was from state-controlled media. In North Korea, until very
recently, most people thought that, even though they were starving to death, the people in South Korea had it much worse.
Once again, they believed so because the state controlled the media and fed them lies. Only with the availability of
illegal cell phones from China did the people start to learn just how good life was elsewhere. During the Cold War,
citizens of the Soviet Union believed that Americans lived in poverty. After all, didn't all the papers say so?
Today in America, we have a similar situation.
Don't
Be Misled by the Media, Cuba Isn't Changing. After the nominal change in Cuba's leadership, the New York
Times managed to come out with the most New York Times headline ever: "More Black Officials in Power in Cuba
as Leadership Changes." The Los Angeles Times demanded that as Castro era "ends" in Cuba, so should the U.S.
embargo. NPR followed hopefully, and Buzzfeed provided a romanticized photo spread. Reading such
affectionate and hopeful portrayals might make one want to believe that Cuba really is currently undergoing a transformation
that will define its future. I hate to shatter that optimism, but Cuba isn't changing, and American policymakers and
media really shouldn't be so naïve and optimistic about it.
The
New York Times Best-Seller List: Another Reason Americans Don't Trust The Media. About half the American
people do not believe the mainstream media tell the truth. They believe the media are more interested in promoting
their left-wing views than reporting the truth. [...] In order to think it is mere coincidence, you have to believe The New
York Times more than reality itself, which about half the country seems to. While The Times occasionally lists
conservative books and, very rarely, religious books, after comparing the list and the BookScan list, the Observer concluded
in 2016: "If you happen to work for The New York Times and have a book out, your book is more likely to stay on the list
longer and have a higher ranking than books not written by New York Times employees. ... If you happen to have written a
conservative-political-leaning book, you're more likely to be ranked lower and drop off the list faster than those books with
a more liberal political slant." In other words, The New York Times best-seller list is not a best-seller list —
which even The New York Times once acknowledged.
Caravan? What
Caravan? As everyone knows, a "caravan" of more than 1,000 Hondurans is making its way North through Mexico
toward the United States. This caravan had sought, and drawn, a great deal of publicity before President Trump began
talking about it. [...] Weirdly, the liberal media pretended to have no idea what the President was talking about.
A Tale of Black
Racism. The Philly media, like the media elsewhere, makes much of gentrification. Philadelphians are
forever hearing about what a social evil it is. [...] Constantly propagating notions such as white supremacy, white
privilege, gentrification, and others, the media creates a kind of toxic intellectual air. Unhappy people breathe it
in, and the result is all sorts of mad beliefs. It is as if being white guaranteed a middle-class
existence. It is as if being black meant that personal failure is not even a possibility; in place of it
there is always some white discrimination or other.
77%
believe the media lies. "More than 3-in-4 Americans believe that traditional major TV and newspaper media
outlets report Fake News, including 31% who believe this happens regularly and 46% who say it happens occasionally. The
77% who believe fake news reporting happens at least occasionally has increased significantly from 63% of the public who felt
that way last year," Monmouth University reported. That is a fundamental threat to our republic. The media keeps
telling us we need informed voters — and then it misinforms voters. Repeatedly.
Poll:
77 Percent Believe Traditional Media Guilty of Fake News. According to a survey by the Monmouth University Polling Institute, the vast
majority of Americans believe that mainstream media outlets report "fake news." A whopping 77 percent of over 800 respondents
relayed their distrust for major news organizations in both television and print — a marked increase from the 63 percent
that was already skeptical a year ago. Of those, 31 percent believe it to be a regular occurrence, while 46 percent
see it as a more occasional issue.
You've Been Hoodwinked.
(Perhaps.). My friends on the far left are convinced that Sinclair anchors reading a national promo is Hitler-esque
Orwellian brainwashing. My friends on the far right are happy and hopeful that Sinclair might, indeed, be pushing
conservative views. Those in the middle don't care or seem to think it's much ado about nothing.
The Herd Media Stampedes Sinclair.
In an unguarded moment during the 2016 campaign, MSNBC's Mika Brzezinski remarked that it is "our job," not Trump's, to "control exactly what
people think." The Sinclair Broadcast Group referenced that line in its promo. But the news accounts of the phony controversy over
the promo never mention that Brzezinski did in fact make that outrageous comment. Unless I missed it, Brzezinski herself didn't
acknowledge the reference to the comment she made. Gripping her chair like a Victorian fainting couch, Brzezinski found the promo
"frightening." But beneath the hysterical blather was nothing more than the hurt feelings of an exposed liberal propagandist.
Sinclair had nailed her and she didn't like it. It is rich farce to see the herd media stampeding Sinclair for refusing to join it.
How dare Sinclair read its own script and not ours! That's the demand implicit in the media's temper tantrum, all while journalists
pontificate about the importance of a "free press."
The
Knee-Jerk Liberals Spit At Sinclair. [Scroll down] MSNBC's Joe Scarborough shamelessly lectured that it
is like the days of Pravda in the Soviet Union: "A national broadcasting system that is shoving propaganda down local
anchors' throats straight from the pen of somebody who's a Trump acolyte," he stated hysterically, "is really, really chilling."
Chilling? This man appears on a national broadcasting system pushing propaganda daily. A network whose motto in former
President Obama's years was "Lean Forward" (which sounded like former Communist Chairman Mao Zedong's Great Leap Forward) and that
passes judgment on propaganda is why networks like Sinclair have emerged. On HBO, John Oliver denounced Sinclair anchors as
sounding like "members of a brainwashed cult." So, exactly how do anchors of news or entertainment shows across the country
deliver their reports? Oliver doesn't have a script?
The Editor says...
This story is about a corporate-mandated editorial that was supposed to run on every station owned by Sinclair.
It appears that each station put its most trusted news anchors on camera and had them read the prescribed script.
Dave Chiselface and Suzie Plastique make a lot of money, and they'll read whatever they're told to read — with a
smile. Any resemblance to sincerity is the product of Dave and Suzie's acting skills. It's a story about media
dishonesty only because it's an editorial comment disguised as a promo, and because the typical viewer doesn't know that
all the other TV stations owned by the same company are airing the same editorial.
News
Anchors At Sinclair Owned Stations Caught Reading From Same Corporate Mandated Script. Sinclair Broadcast
Group, which owns nearly 200 local television stations across the country as well as a wide variety of other assets in radio
and online media, is under scrutiny this morning after video emerged of local anchors at a number of the stations it owns
reading what appears to be a corporate-prepared script that touches on the whole so-called "fake news" phenomenon.
Keywords: Teleprompter, rip and read, propagandists, phony concerned look, plastic-coated, sock puppets Sinclair
Made Dozens of Local News Anchors Recite the Same Script. It may not have seemed strange to individual
viewers. But Timothy Burke, the video director at Deadspin, had read a report last month from CNN, which quoted local
station anchors who were uncomfortable with the speech. Mr. Burke tracked down the Sinclair affiliates and found when they
had aired what he called a "forced read."
Sociologist:
Less Than 10 Percent Of March For Our Lives Participants Were Children. A sociologist on MSNBC threw cold water
on all the media's claims that the March For Our Lives protests were spontaneous and led by the nation's children during a
"Morning Joe" segment on Monday [3/26/2018]. University of Maryland sociologist Dana Fisher conducted a study of the
demographics of Saturday's march in Washington, D.C., and discovered that only less than 10 percent of those in the crowd
were under the age of 18. While Fisher tried to make it sound like these individuals were all potential voters, it is
likely that many of those who showed up were simply run-of-the-mill liberal activists.
A
User's Guide To Media Coverage Of Political Protests. [L]iberal protests are somehow not political. When
co-host Meghan McCain stated the facts on these marches on "The View" — a show that advocates passing gun control
legislation and sticking it to the National Rifle Association — Whoopi Goldberg was outraged. She said:
"Let's stick to what this particular march is today. ... It's not political." What will Whoopi claim next? That
"The View" isn't political either? The Women's March organizers of this walkout wanted to protest not just gun
violence but also racism, police brutality and how "the United States has exported gun violence through imperialist foreign
policy to destabilize other nations." That's superpolitical.
The Corporate War
on Free Speech. [T]his same media weren't nearly as shrill about the fact that an alleged Black Lives Matter
supporter blew away five cops in Dallas in 2016. This was after BLM-inspired rioting and beatings across the country that
were based on dubious half-truths peddled by the same media about a series of incidents that turned out to be much more
complicated once the facts slowly leaked out. Hands up, don't shoot? He was just buying Skittles? He
couldn't breathe, even though he was able to say he couldn't breathe eleven times? Assigning guilt is a slippery and
often slimy business, but one might plausibly argue that the way the mainstream media has purposely sculpted sensational
racial narratives has in some way led to, or at least enabled, acts of violence and even murder. Despite — or
maybe even because of — all that, corporate media stand firmly and proudly behind groups such as Black Lives Matter.
Sharyl
Attkisson Explains the Origins of the 2016 'Fake News' Narrative. In a Tedx Talk at the University of Nevada a
couple of weeks ago (watch the video below) investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson revealed the origins of the "fake news"
narrative that was aggressively pushed by the liberal media and Democrat politicians during the 2016 election, and how it was
later flipped by President Donald Trump. Attkisson pointed out that "fake news" in the form of tabloid journalism and
false media narratives has always been around under different names. But she noticed that in 2016, there seemed to be a
concerted effort by the MSM to focus America's attention on the idea of "fake news" in conservative media. That looked
like a propaganda effort to Attkisson, so she did a little digging and traced the new spin to a little non-profit called
"First Draft," which, she said, "appears to be the about the first to use 'fake news' in its modern context."
The Editor says...
I don't know what Tedx is. Nor do I care.
Fake
News Flashback: CNN Declared Trump 'Bonkers' for Saying Clinton, Dems Behind Dossier. Writing for the
far-left CNN back in October, Chris Cillizza declared President Donald Trump "bonkers" and "crazy" for suggesting what turned
out to be 100 percent true: that the Democrats, Hillary Clinton, the FBI, and Russia, were all behind what is known
as the "Russian dossier."
Confronting
Leftist Lies. Movies and TV shows are no longer mindless entertainment. Ninety-nine percent of what comes
out of Hollywood is lies; designed to seduce Americans into embracing Leftists' ungodly agenda. Hollywood relentlessly
demonizes Christians, America, mainstream Americans, and Trump. [...] The 6 o'clock news was on the TV in the background
while I was chatting with a relative at his home Folks, it was a truly painful experience. Every news story was liberal
spin and/or lies. Programming after the news was seductive liberal propaganda. I watched my relatives unknowingly
soaking in all the Leftist beautifully presented excrement.
The Nunes Memo:
Just an Opening Act. Wonder of wonders, the liberal press, long opposed to prior restraint when it comes to
publishing material on American intelligence, is howling about the release of the Intelligence Committee memo. They're
suddenly concerned, we're supposed to believe, about damage to national security and the institutional well-being of the FBI.
Democrats and their media allies, notes Roger Simon, have pushed themselves into a corner. They can't decide whether the
best approach is to insist that the memo is a "nothing-burger" or a mortal danger to the country.
Journalism
is Dead. This week we saw a perfect example of how corrupt journalism has become. There was an
opportunity to report the news and journalists and their fellow travelers in the pundit class balked. While that wasn't
unusual, what was is how they did it in the lead up to the news, not bothering to wait until they'd seen what they were
attempting to discredit. [...] The lying by Democrats in the lead up to the memo's release wasn't surprising, nor was the
complicity of journalists in spreading that lie. What was is how there was virtually no curiosity or interest in the
memo and its contents in the days leading to its release from the people whose job it is supposed to be to convey information
to the public. All journalists did was attempt to taint it's release so as to foster disinterest in it in their
audience when they could finally see it.
Transcript
Shows The Daily Beast Peddled Fake News About Devin Nunes. Once again, reporters got burned by believing
anonymous Democrats on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. Betsy Woodruff and Spencer Ackerman of The
Daily Beast credulously believed their "sources familiar with the exchange," who said Republican Rep. Devin Nunes, the
chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, refused to deny he had coordinated with the White House when putting together a
memo alleging surveillance and law enforcement abuses at the FBI. In fact, Nunes explicitly denied the charge before
shutting down the line of questioning in order to provide other members who were not trying to hijack the hearing time to get
actual committee business done.
The
Tet Offensive Revisited: Media's Big Lie. Josef Goebbels called it the Big Lie, the deliberate
misrepresentation of facts and reality in order to achieve a political objective. It's been part and parcel of the New
World Disorder we've lived under for the past century, ever since Vladimir Lenin first used a Big Lie to disguise his seizure
of power from Russia's post-czar provisional government in November 1917, by telling the Russian people he was preventing a
coup not perpetrating one. America's first major encounter with the Big Lie, with all its disastrous consequences,
started 50 years ago today, when the American mainstream media — CBS and the other networks, plus the New York
Times and the Washington Post — decided to turn the major Communist Tet offensive against U.S. forces and
South Vietnam on January 30, 1968, into an American defeat, rather than what it actually was: a major American victory.
"I love
Trump for being frank with Africans". Conan O'Brien went to a resort in Haiti to prove it is not a [bad]
country. The people who live there know better than the tourists. Conan's trip was too clever by half.
Inadvertently, he showed himself as a white guy millionaire with a Harvard degree sipping an adult beverage from some sort of
coconut shell — while nearby, one million native people are still without sewers eight years after the
earthquake. How is this different from the colonialism Haitians overthrew 227 years ago?
Media
lying about McConnell to help save face for Chuck Schumer. Chuck Schumer has a huge problem, and his friends in
the mainstream media are pitching in to help — with lies. Now that he has caved in on the Schumer Shutdown,
the radicals who dominate his party are angry and demanding protection for the DACA illegal aliens, and Schumer has promised
to oppose funding the border wall that he had earlier discussed supporting in return for action in DACA. But instead of
reporting on the disarray among the Democrats, the narrative just has to be that the evil Republicans engaged in perfidy.
Poll
Shows Public Waking Up to Media Lies About GOP Tax Plan. Now that a little thing called economic reality has
overtaken months of dishonest media reporting about the Republican tax bill signed into law by President Trump last month, a
plurality of 47 percent support the bill, while only 34 percent remain opposed. This is a huge (and predicable)
turnaround when compared to those polls released in the heart of the media campaign to kill the tax bill.
Bloomberg
wins Fake News of the week. Bloomberg broke a story just as the New York Stock Exchange began trading on
Wednesday [1/10/2018]: ["]China Weighs Slowing or Halting Purchases of U.S. Treasuries["] The story
turned out to be the latest in a string of Fake News reports by a news organization owned by Mike Bloomberg, whose
opposition to President Trump knows no bounds[.] Bloomberg's anger at Trump has rendered his company unreliable
when it comes to financial news.
Poor Hillary
Clinton. Until 2016, none had thought to make it an issue of gender, largely because one gender had been
shared by all comers. But in 2016, that was changed by the serious entry of Hillary Clinton, who managed to lose to
Donald Trump against all odds. Afterward, she blamed her female sex for the loss, after first blaming FBI Director
James Comey. [...] Recent history is rife with examples of people whose very rough treatment (by Hillary's allies) make
her tribulations seem tame. In 2012, Mitt Romney, a Dudley Do-Right if ever there was one, was slammed by the press
and the Democrats as a sadist (for transporting his dog on the roof of his car); as a bully (for cutting the hair of a
classmate in prep school); as a murderer (for causing the wife of a worker to expire from cancer); as dismissive of females (for
using the phrase "binders of women" to refer to resumes given to him by people as possible candidates for government jobs).
New York
Times Gets the Facts Wrong on Land Mines. According to the Times, 8,605 people were injured or killed in 2016 by land mines
and "other booby-trap explosives." Well, 8,605 is the ICBL's headline figure, no doubt about that. But were all those
people actually injured or killed by land mines? Absolutely not. If you turn to page 57 of the ICBL's report, you'll
find that only 732 people were injured or killed by an anti-personnel land mine, another 495 by an anti-vehicle mine, and another 538 by
an "unspecified" mine. That's 1,765 people, not 8,605. The Times says that casualties to land mines are rising. But
the ICBL's report says that in 2015, 2,002 people were injured or killed by these kinds of mines. So casualties are actually
down by 237, not up.
The
History of Fake News in the United States. Fake news isn't suddenly ruining America, but putting government in
charge of deciding what news is fake will. In the wake of President Donald Trump's victory in the 2016 election,
numerous media outlets ran stories claiming that many websites had published false stories that helped Trump beat Hillary
Clinton. Since then Left-leaning opinion writers have called for a solution to this alleged epidemic. The New
York Times reported last January that Silicon Valley giants Facebook and Google will team up with legacy media outlets to
fact-check stories and curtail the proliferation of "fake news." However, intentionally misleading news has been around
since before the invention of the printing press.
Alarmed
by fake news, states push media literacy in schools. Alarmed by the proliferation of false content online,
state lawmakers around the country are pushing schools to put more emphasis on teaching students how to tell fact from fiction.
Half
of all Americans believe the media make up anti-Trump stories. Nearly half of all Americans believe media
outlets fabricate negative stories about President Trump, according to a new survey. Forty-four percent of respondents
in the 2017 Poynter Media Trust Survey say the media invent "fake news" to make the president look bad. Of that cohort,
24 percent say negative stories about Mr. Trump are made up "about half of the time"; 14 percent "most of the time"; and
6 percent "all of the time." Seventy-seven percent of that cohort are Trump supporters, and 74 percent are Republicans.
CNN
is a race-baiting, anti-Trump network. Leave it to the mainstream media to concoct some sort of wild-eyed theory that
President Trump's promise to say "Merry Christmas" is some sort of coded language for white nationalism and white supremacy. CNN
host Don Lemon was among the most high-profile mainstream media minions to advance the race-baiting narrative.
Dishonest Reporter
of the Year Award 2017. How can a writer sitting at home, whether in Beirut or London, possibly get the full
picture using a computer or a telephone for his or her information? The Independent's Mideast correspondent, Bethan
McKernan, is based in Beirut. The overwhelming majority of her articles about Israel, the Palestinians, Egypt, Syria,
Lebanon, Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Turkey, Libya, and the Gulf states in 2017 had Beirut datelines.
MSNBC's
Katy Tur Wrongly Claims Trump Hasn't Had a Press Conference Lately. Pam Key at Breitbart reported that Friday
on MSNBC, host Katy Tur said it was "laughable" that President Donald Trump had only had one solo press conference in his
first year. "He's been dodging questions from the press for months now, really. He hasn't had a press conference
since what, February?" she asked NBC's Kristen Welker. "That is laughable. It's laughable, Kris, that the
president can't stand in front of the press and take questions from the press." This is self-evidently untrue.
The Death Of Science
Journalism. There was a time when Americans trusted the news. How times have changed. According to
Gallup, Americans' trust in the media has fallen from 72% in 1976 to 32% in 2016. The partisan divide is striking:
Trust among Democrats (51%) is higher than among Independents (30%) and Republicans (14%). When asked their opinion of the
honesty and ethics of various professions, journalists perform rather poorly, ranking below chiropractors and bankers and just
above lawyers. The partisan divide is easy to explain. Among journalists, Democrats outnumber Republicans by
about 4 to 1. It's naive to believe that such a partisan imbalance has no effect on the tone or quality of press
coverage. However, it is doubtful that fact alone accounts for the widespread distrust of journalists. After all,
among scientists, Democrats outnumber Republicans by 9 to 1, but the public still respects them. So, what's going
on? In a word: Lying. Many journalists have an ideological axe to grind, and if the truth is on their side,
great. If not, who cares? Instead of the "L-word," civilized people are supposed to use euphemisms, such as
"one-sided" or "not the whole story." But let's put the faux propriety aside. Purposefully presenting only
half the story is a form of lying.
Five
ways the media tries to convince us tax cuts are bad. To hear the media tell it, tax cuts are Bad For You and
you won't like the result. Pay no attention to the fact that the cost of living is up, the government is bigger,
incomes have stagnated, large corporations are no longer creating jobs, and the U.S. hasn't had a major tax cut since 1986.
Somehow, we are all supposed to believe tax cuts which put more of our own money in our pockets, will make us
miserable. It's the most fallacious collection of up-is-down arguments ever assembled.
NY
Times Reports Obama Only Told 18 Falsehoods During Entire Presidency. A recent New York Times analysis
claims that over his eight years in office, former President Barack Obama only told 18 distinct lies. The Times
set out to compare the trustworthiness of Obama compared to President Donald Trump. "In his first 10 months in office,
[Trump] has told 103 separate untruths, many of them repeatedly. Obama told 18 over his entire eight-year tenure," the
piece reads. On the list are some of Obama's most well-known whoppers, including "If you like your health care plan,
you'll be able to keep your health care plan," and that he "didn't set a red line" on Syria's use of chemical weapons.
By contrast, fact-checker Politifact ruled that over the course of his presidency, Obama made 43 "false" statements and 48
"mostly false" statements. Politifact also identified 7 "pants on fire" statements, which are falsehoods that are "not
accurate and make a ridiculous claim."
Because they won't do it themselves... Trump is
cleaning up journalism. The first ten days of December have seen: [#1] ABC News's Brian Ross lie
about General Flynn's plea bargain. [#2] Reuters and Bloomberg News report on an imaginary subpoena of Trump's
records at a German bank. [#3] CNN lie about Donald Trump Junior being tipped off about a WikiLeaks.
[#4] David Weigel of the Washington Post lie about the size of the crowd at a Trump rally. Liars all of them. Byron
Tau of the Wall Street Journal tweeted: "CNN corrects its earlier report, which appears to be an honest error from two
excellent reporters."
CNN: False
Reporting is the New Normal. The fact is, the media is not trying to report the news, they are trying to
control the narrative. They know that even false reporting puts a certain line of thinking in the minds of the
audience. Even lies can get people to think what you want them to think, if you apply it properly.
All
The Proof You'll Ever Need That America's Media Really Are 'Fake News'. There need be no doubt anymore:
America's mainstream news media hypes fake news — and that's a fact. This past week was disastrous for the
press. A slew of fake stories rained down, pushed by anxious anchormen placed in powerful posts. And we want to
note before we go on, that ALL of this happened in a single week. [...] On Saturday [12/9/2017], a Washington Post
reporter tweeted out a photo of a rally Trump was holding in Florida, which showed a half-empty Pensacola Bay Center.
But the photo was taken long before the president spoke — when the entire arena was packed to the gills.
Wow!
Trump fights back, forces public apology from Washington Post writer for fake news. [Dave] Weigel, for those
who do not remember, was a central figure in JournOlist, the invitation-only online conspiracy among progressive journalists
to manipulate news coverage in their favor. He was allowed to resign from the Washington Post for that activity, only
to be hired back in 2015, once that paper become the political tool of the world's richest (or second or third richest —
depending on Amazon's daily stock price) man, Jeff Bezos. This is the capstone for a catastrophic week for Trump's
opponents in the mainstream media, forced to withdraw and apologize for multiple stories attacking the POTUS.
Trump
Blasts WaPo's Dave Weigel After Reporter Heckles Him with Fake Photo. The context here is crucially important:
[#1] The photo Weigel published was taken before the Trump rally began. And, as you will see below, Weigel knew he was
publishing a photo not taken during the actual rally. [#2] Weigel, who identifies as an objective reporter, is not only
publishing a misleading photo, but the link at the top of his now-deleted tweet proves that he is responding directly to one of
Trump's tweets — in other words, he is publicly heckling the president personally. [#3] By responding
directly to the president in this way, Weigel is openly taunting Trump, even going so far as to troll the president with his
own "packed to the rafters" comment. Even if the photo had been a legitimate representation of the crowd-size, directly
jeering the president in this way is still outrageous behavior from anyone who describes himself as a legitimate journalist.
'They
all knew': Media elites roared in laughter at obscene 2008 'roast' sending up Matt Lauer's office sexcapades.
Embattled NBC executives have been falling over themselves, insisting they had no idea about Matt Lauer's pervy past.
But if anyone doubts that New York's media elite was aware of Lauer's reputation, they should look no further than a
top-secret "roast" of Lauer that took place in October 2008. The notorious event — now legendary in New York
media circles — pushed the outer limits of sexist, racist, homophobic and obscene jokes — and left
little doubt that Lauer's colleagues knew NBC's biggest star had a troubled marriage and a wandering eye.
Media
meltdown and the damage it does to democracy. Relying on the supposedly respectable news media would have left
you believing that the FBI found President Trump urging national security adviser Michael Flynn to contact Russia during the
campaign (it didn't), that Trump national security aide K.T. McFarland wrote that Russia threw the election to Trump (she
didn't), and that Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, blasted sick, poor children as slackers (he didn't). These false or
misleading stories, all of which, not coincidentally, disparaged Republicans, were parroted and retweeted and broadcast by
countless reporters before being completely debunked. Countless readers and viewers still don't realize that the
stories produced by this sloppy reporting are false.
Sick
and Tired of Schumer and Others Continually Lying about Tax Cuts and Debt. What makes me sicker is that almost
all reporters just repeat Schumer's talking points as if they are factual. They repeat the outright lies over and over
again, and then after indoctrinating the readers with pure garbage, they take a poll of fewer than 1,000 people, skewed
with more Democrats than Republicans, to show that the people aren't in favor of reform. Then they run the poll results
as if they are somehow factual news. Reporters should be truly ashamed of themselves for pushing an agenda instead of
ever even considering reporting actual results of previous tax cuts.
The
Mainstream Media Doesn't Deserve Our Respect or Our Trust. You mainstream media hacks want trust and
respect? Maybe you shouldn't Tweet out instructions to contact Senators to defeat the tax bill like the New York
Times just did. Maybe you should stop covering for the off-camera leering and grabbing and pinching of the talking
heads who excoriate Trump for misogyny. Maybe you should stop hiring journalists who are ex-Obama flunkies. Maybe
you shouldn't email offers of assistance to Democrat campaigns. Maybe you should stop lying to us.
The
Democratic Party Is Dead. For years, we have been hearing that the Republican Party was on the ropes: when Bill
Clinton won in 1992 and 1996; when Barack Obama won in 2008 and 2012; when the tea party launched in 2009; when Texas Senator
Ted Cruz and company shut down the federal government for a few days in 2013. (Remember when we were told that voters were
going to "punish" Republicans in 2014? Yeah, that was right before they handed the GOP control of the House and Senate.) When
Donald Trump roared into the primaries in 2015 and knocked out his more — shall we say — traditional GOP
rivals one by one, and even (perhaps especially) since Donald Trump's election, the media's go-to narrative has been how the
Republican Party is fragmented and crumbling. Now we know that it's the Democratic Party that's rotting from within.
Gunfight,
Home Invader Killed, Headline: Victim Identified. Many self defense shootings are not reported in the
media. Many are not entered as justified homicides in the FBI Uniform Crime Reports (UCR). A self defense shooting,
which included a justified homicide, occurred in the 800 block of Waugoo Avenue, in Oshkosh, Wisconsin,at night, on
November 5th, 2017. The initial reporting did not include any indication this was a justified self defense shooting.
The
Actual 2016 FBI Report on "Russian Hacking" Does Not Show What Media Claim It Does. Last year against the
backdrop of President Obama's sanctions announcement against Russia, we closely reviewed the "Russian Malicious Cyber
Activity — Joint Analysis Report". This December 2016 intelligence report is the report where the media talking
points "17 intelligence agencies agreed" and the Russian "hacking of the election" began. The report was released to
coincide with President Obama kicking out Russian diplomats as punishment for the content therein. Everyone talks about
this report, yet almost no-one talking about it has actually read it.
MSNBC
Panel Falsely Claims Heroic Neighbor Didn't End Texas Shooter's Rampage. On Tuesday's episode of Meet the Press
Daily, panelist Yamiche Alcindor and host Chuck Todd incorrectly said Stephen Willeford did not exchange fire with the Texas
church shooter or end his attack. "When I was watching President Trump today, and he was making his argument that [the
shooter] was essentially stopped by someone with a gun, I thought he killed himself," Yamiche Alicindor, a national reporter
for the New York Times, said. "There was not a big gun fight, and he was not stopped. There needs to be a fact
check on how it was stopped." "Right," Chuck Todd responded. "The narrative with Mike Huckabee and the president is
a little bit off the rails." The facts show that Stephen Willeford did exchange gunfire with the Texas gunman as his
attack was still preceding. The story of Farida Brown, as told to the Washington Post by her son David Brown, makes it
clear that at least some of the survivors of the attack credit Willeford with saving their lives.
How Leftism Makes Us Stupid.
Perhaps the worst thing about having an exclusively leftist media is that it makes all of us, right and left, stupider.
Take for example that media's reaction to the latest Islamist terror attack in Manhattan. Evil loser Sayfullo Saipov
follows the ISIS playbook by driving a rented van over innocent civilians, killing eight. He jumps out of the van
shouting "Allahu Akbar!" (Allah is the greatest) and later tells police he's glad about what he did and requests an ISIS flag
in his hospital room. In reporting the event, CNN Crime and Justice reporter Shimon Prokupecz refused to share the police
description of the killer after he was caught. Because he's a journalist, and the last thing we want is to have journalists
going around giving people information! CNN's Jake Tapper responded to news of the loser's Arabic shout by remarking inanely
that Allahu Akbar is "sometimes said under the most beautiful of circumstances, and too often we hear it being said in moments
like this." He later clarified that he was referring to beautiful circumstances like weddings and births. Yeah, what
if the guy had been waving a Confederate flag? They wear those at some weddings too. [...] None of which is to make fun
of a tragedy, of course, but only of the absurd reaction of the leftist press.
Two
popular conservative Twitter personalities were just outed as Russian trolls. Jenna Abrams was a popular figure
in right-wing social media circles. Boasting nearly 70,000 followers, Abrams was featured in numerous news articles
during the 2016 election, spotlighted by outlets as varied as USA Today, the Washington Post, the BBC, and Yahoo!
Sports. [...] But Abrams never existed. According to information released by House Democrats earlier this week, Abrams
was one of more than 2,750 fake Twitter accounts created by employees at the Internet Research Agency, a "troll farm" funded
by the Russian government based in St. Petersburg.
More Fake News From the New York
Times. The New York Times had two veteran reporters working overtime on Friday night after the representative
of a respected conservative publication testified before the House Intelligence Committee. Literally. The piece by
Kenneth P. Vogel and Maggie Haberman was posted at 7:32 pm on Friday night [10/27/2017]. It's brief and
breathless. And embarrassingly dishonest. The Times is practiced to deceive. It contorts language
and chronology to present information in a way so as to not inform, to misinform.
Poll:
Plurality Of Americans Believes Media Makes Up Stories About Trump. On the one hand, it's an amazing testament
to how far public trust in the media has fallen that more Americans than not believe they're publishing false stories about
the president. On the other hand, how is this number not 100 percent? It's not a matter of opinion.
The media does, in fact, sometimes publish honest-to-goodness fake news about Trump and his orbit.
Media
Dishonesty Gives Trump Legitimate Talking Points. If you listen to the media today, you'd be hard pressed to
know that President Trump both complying with the law and with a court decision. The media would prefer to make this
all about dismantling Obamacare and ignore the fact President Obama had no constitutional authority to do what he did.
When the President blasts fake news, this is what he is talking about and this gives his supporters ample room to ignore the
President's more outlandish attacks against the press.
Trump
EPA to propose repealing Obama's climate regulation: document. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency will propose repealing the
Clean Power Plan — the Obama administration's centerpiece regulation to fight climate change — and plans to solicit input
on a rule to replace it, according to an EPA document seen by Reuters.
The Editor says...
This article is accompanied by a photograph (left) which appears to be a photo of an industrial plant of some sort, with the dishonest
caption, "Smoke is released into the sky at a refinery in Wilmington, California March 24, 2012." The "smoke" being released is
obviously water vapor, since it appears to be absorbed into the surrounding atmosphere within a few seconds of its release. The
contrast on the photo appears to have been enhanced to make the emission appear to be black as it leaves the vent, but smoke doesn't
turn white and then disappear within a few seconds. This appears to me to be a shamelessly dishonest attempt to make harmless
vapor look like smoke.
Trump
Fulfills Campaign Pledge on Contraception Mandate. [Scroll down] Today [10/6/2017], Trump made good on
that pledge when his administration issued a new rule that will exempt organizations whose owners or shareholders harbor
religious or moral objections to paying for certain types of birth control via health plans. It goes without saying, of
course, that this new rule is being grotesquely misrepresented by Obamacare apologists in the legacy "news" media. The
Washington Post, for example, reported the regulatory change under the following misleading headline: "Trump
administration narrows Affordable Care Act's contraception mandate."
Is
Any Part Of The Russia Election Hacking Story True? In June, Samuel Liles, the Department of Homeland
Security's acting director of the Office of Intelligence and Analysis Cyber Division, told Congress that "the Russian
government tried to hack election-related computer systems in 21 states." Then, earlier this month, the election hacking
story made headlines again when DHS officials notified state officials in 21 states about the attempts to breach their voter
registration systems. This sparked renewed outrage from Democrats about how the election results had been "hacked" by
Russia. But then the story started to fall apart, when Wisconsin and California said DHS was wrong about their systems
being targeted. California found that Russia hadn't scanned its Secretary of State website at all.
Facebook
admits it promoted fake Vegas massacre stories. Facebook admitted Monday [10/2/2017] that its system automatically promoted
stories that falsely identified the shooter in the Las Vegas massacre. The social network said links from websites such
as The Gateway Pundit and others were posted and spread across their site Sunday night. The stories claimed the shooter
was an "anti-Trump" Democrat and displayed pictures of a man who is not identified as a suspect.
Don't
Fall for Jimmy Kimmel's Cheap Zero-Sum Emotionalism. In recent months, late-night talk show host Jimmy Kimmel
has taken to scaremongering his audience with well-worn Democratic Party talking points regarding health care insurance
policy. Between yuks, he occasionally accuses Republicans of being would-be baby killers, which is treated as an
important political development because, well, Jimmy Kimmel is famous. This week, the comedian was back to explain why
the new Graham-Cassidy Republican "repeal" bill is bad news. There were only two things wrong with his monologue:
Almost everything he said was either completely untrue or highly misleading, and his simplistic emotional appeal was
completely disconnected from the real world.
Horsepucky
News Courtesy of Murdoch's Wall Street Journal. Remember, there are trillions of dollars at stake and all of
the vested financial interests, writ large, have positioned themselves to do anything possible to draw down the support for
President Trump's 'America-First' agenda. Don't kid yourselves or sell your intelligence short; it ain't about Donald
Trump per se, the opposition is against the policies of President Donald Trump. Trump's 'America-First' policies are
adverse to the interests of multinational corporations and the multinational financial institutions who underwrite those
corporations.
If the Media Doesn't
Tell the Truth, What Use Is It? Yesterday [8/30/2017], Jim Treacher at The Daily Caller posted a story:
"Bill And Hillary Clinton Finally Sell Hamptons Mansion." Only one problem: Bill and Hillary didn't actually
own the mansion. Follow the link, and you get to the real story: the Hamptons mansion that Bill and Hillary
have rented in the past has been on the market and under contract for two years, and the sale finally closed. There are
lots of things that you could say about this — like observing that it's cool how people who were flat broke in
2000 can afford $150,000 a month rent for a summer place — but you can't honestly say "the Clintons finally sell
their mansion." This is why God made the passive voice: you write a headline like the Free Beacon did —
"Clinton Hamptons 'Summer Vacation Rental' Sells For $29 Million."
Left-Wing
Outlets Spread False Story Claiming GOP Official Turned Down Disaster Aid. A number of left-wing outlets spread
a false story claiming Texas Republican Secretary of State Rolando Pablos turned down aid in the wake of Hurricane Harvey,
and instead requested prayers. The story appears to have spread from one sentence in an article from Canada's CBC
News. The story referenced an offer from the Canadian province of Quebec to send Texas "equipment and crews to help
restore power and to provide blankets, beds, pillows and hygienic products."
Media
& Politicians Admitting They Lied About Russia. It has been nearly three weeks since The Nation pushed an
explosive memo from the Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity into mainstream consciousness with an article detailing
the evidence that the DNC leaks last year could not have been the result of a Russian hack. By continuing to ignore it,
the US intelligence community and all the pundits and politicians who have advanced the Russian hacking narrative are tacitly
admitting that they lied.
CNN's
Republican Pundit Gave Thousands of Dollars to Dems, Including the Chairwoman of the DNC. It turns out CNN's
spokeswoman for Republicans is not as Republican as you might think. Ana Navarro, who has been the perpetual presence
as the "Republican" on many panels across the news spectrum, has donated thousands of dollars over the past two decades to
some of the most controversial and partisan leaders of the Democratic Party, a new report finds.
It's time to
chill the "free press". Allowing Sarah Palin to continue her libel lawsuit against the New York Times "would
chill expression by journalists who want to draw connections and inferences," Noah Feldman wrote in a column for Bloomberg
News. That is an excellent idea, because increasingly people in the press show a constant, malicious, and reckless
disregard for the truth. In 2011, Jared Lee Loughner killed a federal judge and five others, and severely wounded
Democratic Congresswoman Gabby Giffords. Democratic Party operatives spread the lie that a map targeting Giffords in
the last election inspired the carnage. However, Loughner did not vote in that election. He is psychotic.
But the press keeps spreading this lie.
Field Report
From The Left-Wing Violence in Arizona. Today, the following morning, I open the Arizona Republic to see the
headline "VIOLENCE ERUPTS!" with a picture of one sad [chump] on his knees in front of lines of police. This apparently
happened after the rally. Wait, "VIOLENCE ERUPTS?" No it didn't. Nothing "erupted." Protesters became
violent. There was no violence at all on the part of the Trump supporters. None. This is another example of
fake news at its best, failing to even follow basic journalistic (and writing) rules of active voice in which a subject —
the protesters — cause the action-eruption. And the sad little Fake News media continues to whine about how
it is treated.
The
media lies about the Boston rally. The Boston rally was a watershed event. But not in the way the
mainstream media has been portraying it, as a bold stand against white supremacy in the wake of Charlottesville.
Rather, it demonstrates the power of propaganda to foment mass hysteria and mob rule. Reality no longer matters.
For the media refuses to report this seminal truth: There were no white supremacists or neo-Nazis. None.
Not even one. Instead, they engaged in a massive disinformation campaign that spurred over 40,000 "antifascists" to
descend upon Boston Common. The alt-left's goal: to counter-demonstrate against an alleged "white nationalist"
rally. Yet, what they were protesting was the very opposite. The Free Speech rally had nothing to do with
white supremacy or the Ku Klux Klan — never mind the violence in Charlottesville.
Colin
Kaepernick — History's Hero? The National Football League's preseason is underway, and national anthem-hating
quarterback Colin Kaepernick still doesn't have an NFL job. One can easily identify the liberal journalists by their anguish
over this so-called injustice. You can also identify them by their dishonest arguments.
The
media couldn't be more blatant in distorting Trump's words on Charlottesville. Has the media ever so
deliberately and consistently misinterpreted what a president said? It certainly seems as if the media finally found
its proof that President Trump is a racist. [...] Does the press just think that no one will look at what Trump actually
said? For those who do look at the original interview and Trump's multiple, clear statements on the matter, the media
risks losing what little credibility it still has.
'Freedom of the Press' Doesn't Mean What You Think.
Progressive propaganda, relying on misdirection, misinterpretation, and outright falsehoods, permeates American life and touches or taints every
topic. The corporations that produce mass entertainment and news, the government bureaucracies that shape and fund education, the schools from
kindergarten to college, and the tech firms that control the flow of information and ideas, are all subject to a groupthink that, for all intents and
purposes, brooks absolutely no dissent from Leftist dogma.
The Media
Lied About The Leaked Google Memo. If all you do is get your news from the establishment media, you'd be under
the impression that former Google engineer James Damore is a dangerous bigot who hates women and minorities. As reports
of the so-called "anti-diversity" leaked memo from Google surfaced on the Internet, journalists exposed their preconceptions
and bias with misleading headlines and equally biased stories.
Leftover
Libels of Sebastian Gorka Served Up at Rolling Stone. As Joel Pollak reports in Breitbart this morning
[8/11/2017], Rolling Stone magazine has refried and repackaged the whole range of lies — comprehensively
refuted — against White House adviser Sebastian Gorka. The left-wing media keeps setting a new bar for
chutzpah. Central to the Stone story is an attempt to tar Dr. Gorka with guilt by association with right-wing
political parties in Hungary, where he was active between 2000 and 2008. "Gorka served as adviser to [Hungary's prime
minister Viktor] Orbán," the article states, "who's been called a 'neo-fascist dictator' by Sen. John McCain."
As it happens, the left-wing Jewish news site The Forward offered this allegation in the form of a doctored tape of a 2006
Hungarian television interview with Dr. Gorka. That brought the full interview to light — and the full interview
shows Dr. Gorka denouncing Orbán for exploiting popular unrest for nefarious purposes. Sebastian Gorka was
not Orbán's "adviser," but a principled and uncompromising critic.
Rolling
Stone Collects Every Lie About Sebastian Gorka in One Place. Bob Dreyfuss's profile of White House aide
Sebastian Gorka in Rolling Stone is an impressive feat of scholarship, compiling every lie about the former Breitbart
News editor in one place. It is a useful service for the ideologically addled and the functionally illiterate, who like
their propaganda served straight-up, undiluted by the cold ice water of reality. Students of cheap partisan smear jobs
need look no further, for Rolling Stone has perfected the genre. Dreyfuss does not seem to have done any
original research, but recycles work done by other hacks — without, of course, bothering to provide his readers
with any of the defenses that arose in their wake.
Scientists
call out New York Times for incorrect claim about climate report. Scientists appear to have debunked The New
York Times' claim it was leaked a secret, gloomy climate change report which it published amid fears President Trump would
suppress it. On Monday [8/7/2017], The New York Times published a story saying there are concerns that the Trump
administration could suppress what's known as the National Climate Assessment, a project of the U.S. Global Change Research
Program. The story, titled "Scientists fear Trump will dismiss blunt climate report," said the draft report "has not
yet been made public" but "a copy of it was obtained by The New York Times."
Fake News
A US Media Speciality. All of the lies leading to the death of millions told by the criminal Clinton, George W.
Bush, and Obama regimes were transparent. The US media could easily have exposed them and saved the lives of millions of
peoples [sic] and saved seven countries from destruction in whole or part. But the presstitutes cheered on the gratuitous
and criminal destruction of countries and peoples.
The
Left is Already Preparing Tomorrow's Fake News. The American Left has relied on its mastery of the
media — enthusiastically aided and abetted by the 90% of national political journalists today that are
progressives of one stripe or another — for its political power for decades. Ever since the 1950s, the left
has been deliberately creating events in order to attract media attention that pushes a narrative confirming the justice of
their demands. It learned that the new medium of television was perfect for creating artificial dramas that would sway
support its way. [...] It has worked on issue after issue. And here we are today with transgender bathrooms and other
ornaments of the progressive worldview imposed on the public.
Democrats,
ABC, NBC Attack Christian Non-Profit as an 'Anti-LGBT Hate Group'. Last week, Democrats and two mainstream
media outlets branded Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), a Christian legal nonprofit which has won seven Supreme Court cases
in seven years, an "anti-LGBT hate group." Worse, this "hate" designation comes from a terror-linked organization, the
Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). ADF has demanded an apology and attacked this "media malpractice." "Why is ABC and
NBC willing to promote propaganda and cut and paste the Southern Poverty Law Center press release?" Kristen Waggoner, a senior
vice president at ADF, asked Tucker Carlson on Fox News Friday night. "Americans are losing trust in the media for this
very reason."
The
Southern Poverty Law Center Has Become a Dangerous Joke. The Southern Poverty Law Center, the "civil rights watchdog group" that ABC
and NBC so prominently cite, has become a dangerous joke. It's a joke because the very idea that Christians are members of a "hate group"
merely because they advocate for orthodox Christian principles and the liberty to live those principles is so intellectually and ideologically
bankrupt that it's barely worth addressing.
The
Left Media's Extraordinary Popular Delusions. The Clinton campaign came up with their Trump-colluded-with-Russia
meme about twenty-four hours after the election results were verified. It was nonsense then as it is today, but the left's mental
distress has become so grievous that they no longer can be called rational or even sane. After eight months of wild speculation and
various investigations, absolutely nothing has been unearthed that indicates in any way that the Trump campaign, least of all Trump
himself, colluded with Russia to affect the outcome of the election. [...] The last eight and a half years have proven to the American
people that the Democrat left and the media are two parts of the same criminal enterprise that feed each other's addiction to power.
Stupid
Hostile Media. President Donald Trump drives people crazy. Especially those in the media. They hate
him so much, they leap on every anti-Trump rumor. The Federalist's Jordyn Pair points out that the press repeatedly
told us that a dozen Trump administration members were about to be fired, including Attorney General Jeff Sessions, Press
Secretary Sean Spicer and strategists Steve Bannon and Jared Kushner. Months later, all still work for or with the
administration.
How to manufacture
a scandal. Another piece falls into place, of a mosaic in which Democrats set out in 2016 to create a false
appearance of collusion between President Trump and Russia. It's pretty devious.
The
Media Perpetuated A Clinton Lie For 9 Months. What It Means For The Russia Narrative. When Hillary
Clinton claimed "17 intelligence agencies" agree on Russian meddling in the third presidential debate, a host of media
outlets including The New York Times rated the claim as 100 percent true. Nine months later, those same outlets say the
stat is obviously false, and there's been a "simple" explanation as to why all along. A closer look at how the claim
survived and thrived over those nine months reveals a startling lack of skepticism in the press when it comes to the Russia
narrative. The truth is the great majority of the 17 agencies that make up the U.S. intelligence community
had nothing to do with the investigation and made no judgments about the matter.
The
Washington Post Offers Up A Textbook Case Of Garbage, Biased Journalism. One might be shocked back into a coma
to learn James Hodgkinson was not an angry conservative, but instead was an angry Bernie Sanders supporting, Occupy Wall
Street guy who favored watching Rachel Maddow on MSNBC, hated Donald Trump and who shot up a Republican congressional
baseball practice, shooting Republicans, including Republican Representative Steve Scalise. If the story
were only about Romanik and didn't mention Hodginkson, it would be a run-of-the-mill profile about some local AM shock-jock
and a pretty good one at that. It is interesting to see the kind of influence local talk shows have just like local
newspapers and local television news. But what editor at the Washington Post allowed Holley to link Hodgkinson to a
right-wing radio talk show host without even confirming he ever listened to the show?
Washington
Post article linking Scalise shooter to conservative radio host sparks online outrage. The Washington Post
struck out with many on social media over an article that appears to blame a right-wing Illinois shock jock for the Virginia
shooting rampage by a Trump-hating, Bernie Sanders volunteer who targeted Republicans during a baseball practice. The
lengthy piece takes aim at the foul-mouthed Bob Romanik, who spews invective on the AM dial from a studio in Belleville,
Ill., shooter James Hodgkinson's hometown. "What's the point of this?" Buzz Feed political reporter Katherine Miller
asked on Twitter. "The shooter hated Trump and there's no indication in the story he listened to this pro-Trump host."
Death spiral
TV news lies to fool advertisers. The Wall Street Journal just accused major television networks of using
deception to goose ratings that include deliberately misspelling the names of the news shows. Sounds like fraud to
me. Unlike their cable brethren, the broadcast newsers seem to be losing customers. I say seem because we have no
way of telling as they have so gamed the ratings system that no honest person can say how many people watch them.
In
TV Ratings Game, Networks Try to Dissguys Bad Newz from Nielsen. Boosting TV ratings is easy for networks that
don't mind playing dumb. In a game largely sanctioned by TV-ratings firm Nielsen, television networks try to hide their
shows' poor performances on any given night by forgetting how to spell. That explains the appearance of "NBC Nitely
News," [...]
Polish
president knocks 'fake news' over wife's Trump handshake. Polish President Andrzej Duda ripped "fake news" reports that his wife
snubbed President Trump for a handshake during Trump's visit to Poland on Thursday [7/6/2017]. In a tweet, Duda confirmed that both he
and his wife shook hands with the president and urged his followers to "fight fake news" together.
Fake
Ratings: Networks Dishonestly Inflate Evening News Numbers...by Misspelling. Now we know that advertisers
and the public are being supplied fake ratings by the same broadcasters who so often deliver fake news. A Thursday
morning [7/6/2017] Wall Street Journal dispatch by Joe Flint reports that the broadcast networks routinely inflate
their reported evening news audiences. They hide low-performing evening audiences by — get this —
"forgetting how to spell." No wonder the networks are so obsessed with "hacking." In the ratings game, what could be
described as a form of it — modifying (the results generated by) "a computer program in a skillful or clever
way" — has become a routine industry practice.
Fake
News: Journalists Invent 'Super Awkward' Handshake Snub of Trump. In the latest example of fake news,
journalists on Thursday hyperventilated about a dramatic snub of Donald Trump by Poland's first lady. Agata
Kornhauser-Duda, it seemed, refused to shake the hand of the President. Except, that's not what happened.
Mere seconds after shaking Melania Trump's hand, Kornhauser-Duda and the President shared a warm embrace.
Mainstream
Media Promotes Death & Mayhem While Accusing POTUS Trump Of "Inciting Violence". President Trump re-tweeted an
amusing CNN-WWF parody video that had him pummeling the fake news network and the liberal media is now losing their minds
over it claiming the president is "inciting violence." This is the same media that assisted in the cover-up of Obama-era
scandals like Fast and Furious, the secret drone bombing program, the ISIS fiasco, dealings with Iran, the atrocities in Libya,
Syria, and on and on and on. And let us not forget this was the same media that actively encouraged the violence in
Ferguson, Baltimore, Dallas etc.
NBC
Decries Rise of Conservative Media for Creating Polarized Country, No Mention of MSNBC. What NBC's Willie Geist
spun as a rundown of the political echo chambers in America on Sunday Today [7/2/2017], quickly devolved into a
condemnation of the rise of conservative media. "Fake news is a favorite term, as you know, of President Trump.
What you consider real and fake in many cases has become a question of where you're sitting and who you're listening to,"
declared Geist at the start of the segment. He ignored the fact that the term was first used to describe stories about
Hillary Clinton during the 2016 election.
If
the Media Wants to Win Back Public Trust, It Can Start Reporting Truthfully on Immigration. [Scroll down] A large reason there is
such a gulf between what happens and what journalists report is that many journalists see themselves as "protectors of the truth," as illustrated by
NBC News host Chuck Todd. The truth is their truth, stemming from an ideology that does not permit any contradictions or contrasting points of
view to get a fair hearing. While some Americans may turn to media figures for affirmation of beliefs already deeply held, I wager most Americans
don't turn to Chuck Todd, or any other media figure for "the truth." Instead, they want reporters to accurately report facts, such as what the director
of ICE actually said about immigration law enforcement. Instead, what we see from too many reporters is the insertion of their own deeply held
beliefs in place of facts on the ground. When a reporter refers to an illegal alien as an "undocumented immigrant" this is an attempt to deny the
criminal act of illegal immigration.
TwitterAudit
Reports CNN Has 17 Million Fake Twitter Followers. Of CNN's millions of followers on their verified Twitter account, over 17 million or
48 percent are fake, according to TwitterAudit. According to TwitterAudit, the site determines the quality and score of real and fake followers
by taking "a sample of up to 5000 (or more, if you subscribe to Pro) Twitter followers for a user and calculates a score for each follower. This
score is based on number of tweets, date of the last tweet, and ratio of followers to friends."
Levin on CNN: They're Not a News
Organization Anymore. On his nationally syndicated radio show Tuesday [6/27/2017], host Mark Levin criticized CNN, saying the network has "sold
out" and is "not a news organization anymore." "CNN, in my view right now, is in a state of complete disintegration," said Mark Levin. "It won't
show up right away on their ratings, but it will eventually show up. They truly do run with phony stories. They have prostituted
themselves. They have sold out. They are not a news organization anymore." Levin's comments came after CNN published, then redacted a
story linking a Trump surrogate to a Russian investment fund, prompting the resignation of three CNN employees.
A
Brief History of 'Fake News'. Disinformation is false information spread deliberately to deceive and cause
chaos. Ion Mihai Pacepa, the highest-ranking defector from the Soviet bloc explained in his book Disinformation
that the ultimate measure of success for disinformation was when the major organs of the media coud be tricked into
unknowingly propagating deliberate falsehoods. But the Russians are far from the only ones practicing disinformation
designed against political systems. The current investigations of alleged "Russian collusion" on Capitol Hill are the
result of a disinformation campaign that was begun by the Democratic Party and continued when the mainstream media were
fooled into publicizing the accusations as fact. [...] Disinformation only works if people refuse to think or find it easier
not to. I ask all to please think about what is being laid in front of you and see if it makes sense.
Mediaite
Tried So Hard To Make A Black Intern Look Like A White Supremacist. The congressional intern Mediaite cast as a
white supremacist Wednesday [6/21/2017] is actually black, The Daily Caller News Foundation has learned. Nate Washington
is a black conservative attending Western Kentucky University and is a former intern of Republican Sen. Tom Cotton.
The
Incomplete Media Narrative about a Murdered Muslim Girl. "Muslim Teen Kidnapped and Brutally Murdered in
Virginia: This Is Terrorism" read a headline from Affinity magazine. Actress and producer Mindy Kaling
also decried the murder on Facebook as "another innocent Muslim person targeted for their faith." The Atlantic
then ran a profile, "'Muslims Feel Under Siege'" highlighting Islamophobia around Ramadan. Many stories used Hassanen's
murder as a lede to foray into a greater narrative about the collective crisis of violence against Muslims. But then
actual facts and details around the case emerged. First, the Fairfax County Police Department publicly ruled out a hate
crime as a motive, announcing that they were looking more closely into extreme road rage. Then, the Daily Caller
reported that the murderer, Darwin Martinez Torres, was an illegal immigrant from El Salvador, with ICE confirming that it
had issued a detainer request against him. Reports subsequently emerged that Torres, who has a girlfriend and son,
barely speaks English and required the use of a translator following his arrest.
Democrats
are incapable of learning from Georgia Special Election loss. As I often do on election nights when Democratic
disappointment is likely to be highest, I watched MSNBC. First I watched Rachel Maddow, then Lawrence O'Donnell. The
MSNBC coverage was nothing short of delusional. The "a loss is really a win" approach was pervasive. Hope sprang
eternal. Maddow in particular continued to spin Trump Russia conspiracy theories. O'Donnell went on and on about
how the Republican healthcare bill would be the doom of Republicans. A phrase used frequently on O'Donnell's show was
that this was an "ominous win" for Republicans because the margin was lower than when Tom Price won — ignoring
that the Republican outperformed Trump's win.
James
T. Hodgkinson: Just Another Well-Intentioned Progressive. Have you followed the drift of the Mainstream
Media (MSM) as to what provoked James T. Hodgkinson to attempt the massacre of the Republican baseball team as it practiced
in Alexandria, Virginia last week? Not the Democratic team, not the Washington Nationals team, but the Republican
team. Well, it was not necessarily Hodgkinson's politics we are told. After all, his politics were pretty much
mainstream progressive. According to the MSM, it was "a Volatile Home Life in Illinois." That is the way the New
York Times put it on the newspaper's front page Sunday [6/18/2017]. Strong drink was alluded to. Anger and violence
were also mentioned as features in Hodgkinson's rural Illinois home. [...] Yet as I say the MSM is soft-pedaling this lunatic's
politics, and I can see why. There was nothing particularly unusual about them.
Journalism
is dead; whatever these guys are doing isn't journalism. What do all of these stories have in common?
They're completely unsourced. No names. No real people. Just claims that come from, in order, "two
administration officials and three outside advisers familiar with the matter," an anonymous tweeter who set up a dummy
Twitter account, and "a Downing Street adviser." None of the latest stories have anyone on the record making the
accusations. Instead, the "news" sites that posted the stories — Politico, the Daily Mail and the
Guardian — simply make the surprising claims and cite anonymous sources. The subjects of the anonymous slurs
have no recourse whatsoever, no right to face their accusers, no way to fight back. The accusation streams out onto the
internet, where it lives forever — whether it's true or not.
Nets
Blackout the Radical Leftist History of NSA Leaker Reality Winner. Not long after top-secret documents from the
National Security Agency made their way onto the internet news site The Intercept on Monday, the Justice Department arrested
NSA contractor Reality Winners. The 25-year-old veteran worked on a military base in Georgia, but online she had a long
history of being heavily Anti-Trump, an apparent social justice warrior, and a supporter of Iran over the U.S. During their
evening broadcasts, the Big Three Networks (ABC, CBS, and NBC) either played down her political attitudes, or outright
ignored them as they reported on what she did. During his report on NBC Nightly News, Justice Correspondent Pete
Williams passed along her family's claim that "she wasn't highly political," and Anchor Lester Holt claimed her "motive
is a mystery." But in reality, Winner was anything but silent about her political views.
From
Fake News to Fake Polls. The media blob is making much of a Washington Post/ABC News poll that finds the public
by a 2 to 1 margin opposes President Trump's decision to withdraw from the Paris Accord: [...] You need to click through to
the actual poll questions to see what [an incompetent] poll it is. The poll only asked five questions. [...]
Conspicuously missing are any questions about whether people support appropriations for wealth transfers from the U.S to
developing nations that the Paris Accord included (and into which Obama tossed $1 billion)? No questions, also,
about whether people are willing to pay higher energy costs for an agreement that will make no difference to the planet's
temperature 80 years from now, according to the EPA's own models.
Examples
of fake news? How much time you got? White House press secretary Sean Spicer finally lost it this week
trying to correct the endless torrent of bogus news stories being churned out daily by the alt-left media. [...] Spicer had
been lecturing the press corps about all their "anonymous sources" and the fictionalized stories "that are absolutely false
... narratives that are wrong ... fake news." He was directing his remarks at a reporter from the Associated
Press — you know, the organization that falsely reported in February that Trump was planning to use "100,000
National Guard troops" to round up "millions" of illegal aliens. "When you see stories get perpetrated that are
absolutely false," Spicer told the crack AP scribe, "that is troubling, and he (the president) is rightly concerned."
So a Democrat operative from the Clinton News Network asked Spicer for an example.
Heroin dealers deserve
prison, not sympathy. The deadly poison that is heroin made its way to your small town from Mexico, where it was grown and processed,
later to be trafficked to your neighborhood where its target customers were someone's children, parents, brothers and sisters. But right now,
when you open the newspaper or turn on the television, you learn that the person that brought the drugs into your neighborhood, which ultimately made
their way to your child, is considered by many in both the media and the public to be a "non-violent, low-level drug offender."
NYT's
Jonathan Martin Steals Photo From Another Journalist, Lies About Where He Got It. The New York Times has
been holding up the torch for truth in the age of fake news and alternative facts — but one of its political
reporters, Jonathan Martin, has no qualms in weaving a few alternative facts of his own. After he lifted a photograph
from another journalist and presented it without attribution, Martin doubled down on his lie and claimed he had no idea it
was the other journalist's photo.
The CIA
and the MSM: 50 Facts the World Needs to Know. Since the end of World War Two the Central Intelligence Agency
has been a major force in US and foreign news media, exerting considerable influence over what the public sees, hears and
reads on a regular basis. CIA publicists and journalists alike will assert they have few, if any, relationships, yet
the seldom acknowledged history of their intimate collaboration indicates a far different story — indeed, one that
media historians are reluctant to examine.
NYT's
Comey Memo Story Doesn't Pass Smell Test. The New York Times reported on Tuesday that President Trump
allegedly asked former FBI Director James Comey to shut down the investigation into former National Security Advisor Michael
Flynn. The source of the allegation is a memorandum, revealed by an anonymous source, allegedly prepared by Comey
regarding a meeting in the Oval Office the day after Flynn was forced to resign for misleading the Vice-President.
While the headline is sensational, The New York Times's report is self-contradictory at times, conflicts with
statements made on-the-record and under oath, overhypes the substance of the memorandum, and is irreconcilable with other
information in the public record.
Eight Lies the MSM Told About Comey Firing.
Over the last week or so the media has breathlessly reported on every little whisper that has escaped from Washington, D.C.
and for the most part — much of what they've told us has been wrong. Sadly, this is a common refrain from
today's media who can't seem to get out of their own way and constantly seem to be tripping over their own failures and
falsehoods. It's almost as if the media has an agenda that they are trying to promote and they are willing to sacrifice
their reputation if it means pushing that agenda forward. In their attempts to use the Comey story to undermine the
Trump administration they've sacrificed every iota of reputation and been unmasked as the biased hypocrites we've always
suspected them to be.
The Media Finally
Admit Obamacare Is Collapsing. [Scroll down] If Obamacare had actually been "working" for all those
years, it would not have suddenly collapsed. In reality, the implosion of the "Affordable Care Act" began when it was
originally implemented. Moreover, the partisan reporters and editors of the legacy media certainly knew it was a
disaster by 2013, when more than five million Americans lost their insurance coverage and Healthcare.gov exploded on the launch
pad. They could not, however, report the truth, because there was no plausible way to blame its failure on the Republicans.
Trump Is Not Shutting
Down the EPA's Data Service. A contractor for the Environmental Protection Agency who was "devastated" by
Hillary Clinton's election loss was the source for a false story stating that the agency is shutting down its climate data
service. The EPA's Open Data service, where users can look up EPA facilities in their area and view pollution graphs,
will continue to operate, despite several news reports to the contrary. Bernadette Hyland, a contractor who has access
to the Open Data website, was quoted in several publications, including the Independent, which falsely claimed "Donald
Trump is to completely shut down one of the government's most important data services."
Media
Lies Exposed: Antifa Thug Girl Was Using Glass Bottles as Weapons Before Punch. As many of you readers
will recall, we've been all over the antifa girl who got rocked at the Berkeley protests this past weekend. We had her
fake name (Louise Rosealma) listed in the big article, but her real name is Emily Rose Marshall. Every since she got
smacked, the media has been working overtime to make this little terrorist into some kind of martyr. Virtue signallers
like Raheem Kassam and Brandon Darby, people who this publication normally respects, have been crying about never hitting a
woman, under any circumstances. The latter camp is [mistaken] on this issue, but the media is outright malicious.
Republican
wins. NYT declares victory for Democrats. From the Washington Examiner: "Republican Kansas State
Treasurer Ron Estes defeated Democrat James Thompson and Libertarian Chris Rockhold Tuesday night [4/11/2017] to keep the state's
4th congressional district in GOP hands." Republican Estes 52.5%, Democrat Thompson 45.7%. A 6.8-point win.
Ho-hum. But Nate Cohn of the New York Times — who gave Hillary an 85% chance of winning on Election
Day — sees this as a victory for the Democratic Party.
Washington Post Blogger Issues Official Apology
for Spreading False Jeff Sessions Story. A Washington Post blogger responsible for launching a false story about Attorney General
Jeff Sessions on Tuesday published an official apology Wednesday [4/12/2017]. Tufts professor and Washington Post blogger Daniel Drezner
helped kickstart the narrative that Sessions had referred to illegal immigrants as "filth" while delivering a speech before border agents at the
U.S.-Mexico border. Drezner took a quote from Sessions' prepared remarks out of context, and released his frustrations on Twitter.
Fact
Check: Fresno Bee Lies About Professor's Call To Kill Trump. There's a lot of talk about a post-truth
society these days. A post-truth society kicks in when there is no respect for even the most blatantly obvious
facts. Professor Lars Maischak, who teaches, among other things, Marx and Hegel, at California State University,
Fresno, tweeted, calls to kill Trump and Republicans. [Tweets] Could the media possibly defend and whitewash
this? Do you even need to ask. No leftist can do anything too terrible for the media to defend.
The 10 Questions
Andrea Mitchell Didn't Ask Susan Rice. Here are a few thoughts about Andrea Mitchell's interview with Susan
Rice — and the key questions that were left unasked. Rice opened the interview by saying, "The allegation is
that somehow Obama administration officials utilized intelligence for political purposes. That's absolutely false."
On the contrary, the allegation is absolutely true — and demonstrating its truth is as easy as unmasking an American
citizen in an NSA intercept.
The Fake News Crisis. Within
living memory, in 1968, the Democratic Party had its convention in Chicago, Hubert Humphrey was their nominee, and there were riots in the streets. [...]
There is one huge difference between what is happening now, and what happened back then. In 1968, there was a culmination of real events
that actually affected America. In 2017, there are no real events causing this, just narratives made up from nothing by a leftist media
that is more divorced from reality than anyone thought possible. • The Russians colluded with Trump. • Trump is
Hitler. Stupid. And evil. • Obama was wonderful, transparent, brilliant, perfect, and fully competent. • Trump's
tax returns will show he is unfit. • He is a racist that wants to ban all Muslims. • Kellyanne Conway is a
ditzy uninformed waste of a woman. • Hillary Clinton is a pure and honest heroine fighting for good. Virtually 24/7, these and
other very unreal narratives are being played to the American public by our pathetic left wing media. In 1968, the news had a reality component.
Yes, there was liberal bias in the news, but at least the events happened.
Washington
Post Lies About Lawmaker's Biblical Reference, Then Refuses To Quote A Single Word He Said. After the
presidential election last November, New York Times executive editor Dean Baquet gave an interview to NPR in which he
admitted that his journalists simply don't understand religion. "We don't get religion," Baquet said. "We don't
get the role of religion in people's lives." Baquet was correct: Acela corridor political reporters don't understand
religion, especially Christianity. Though he was specifically speaking about New York Times reporters, Baquet's
comments clearly also apply to the Washington Post, which on Friday morning accused a Republican congressman from Texas of
claiming that the Bible forbids the unemployed from having food to eat.
WaPo
Caught Red Handed In Big Lie, Tries To Quietly Overhaul Entire Piece. Caitlin Dewey's initial write-up in the
paper (which recently adopted the slogan "Democracy Dies In Darkness") did not include a single quote from the Texas
representative she basically accused of using the Bible to justify taking food from starving people. The story also
incorrectly referred to "2 Thessalonians 3-10," and wildly mischaracterized Rep. Jody Arrington's statements on the
verse. While Arrington did reference 2 Thessalonians 3:10 (The one who is unwilling to work shall not eat) in a
discussion of food stamps, he did not, as The WaPo article suggested, use it to argue unemployed people should not be allowed to eat.
The
New York Times' ongoing dishonesty only helps Trump. Six months ago, I canceled my subscription to the New York
Times because I felt the paper had become ethically challenged in its coverage of the presidential election. And, it
turns out, I was right.
Media
Tries and Fails to Re-invent Ferguson Thug Michael Brown as Victim with Meaningless 'New' Video. In yet another
attempt to turn Ferguson thug Michael Brown into a victim, a new "documentary" filmmaker released a segment of film showing
Brown inside the market he was thought to have robbed just before he was shot and killed by a local policeman back in 2014.
The filmmaker claimed that is "proved" Brown did not rob the store. But in only a day the whole claim unsurprisingly fell
apart. A segment of film showing 18-year-old Michael Brown in the Ferguson quick-mart was released late last week by
documentary film maker Jason Pollock. The filmmaker insisted that the video "proved" that Brown could not have robbed
the market on the day he was killed resisting arrest a few blocks away. The snippet of footage appears in Pollock's
new movie entitled Stranger Fruit.
The
Meals On Wheels Lie Keeps Rolling Along. Let's start with a basic fact. Contrary to news reports last
week, President Trump is not eliminating funding for Meals on Wheels. He's not even cutting it. How do we know
this? Meals on Wheels says so. A statement issued by Meals on Wheels America on Thursday notes that 35% of the
revenues at the 5,000 or so local Meals on Wheels programs come via the Older Americans Act Nutrition Program. Trump's
budget outline says nothing about this program whatsoever.
Outrage
on Wheels. It made for great copy — irresistibly clickable and compulsively shareable.
"Trump's Budget Would Kill a Program That Feeds 2.4 Million Senior Citizens," blared Time's headline. "Trump
Proposed Budget Eliminates Funds for Meals on Wheels," claimed The Hill, in a piece that got 26,000 shares. But
it was false. And it wouldn't have taken long for reporters to find and provide some needed context to the relationship
between federal block grant programs, specifically Community Development Block Grants (CDBG), and the popular Meals on Wheels program.
The
ancient laws of unintended consequences. Fake news now serves as a sort of linguistic canary to remind the
public that it is customarily saturated with a lethal gas of media disinformation. Thus "fake news" seemed a proper if
belated summation and clarification of years of liberal bias in the media that were supposed to be our custodian of the
truth. Were NBC anchor Brian Williams's fantasies fake news? Were Dan Rather's "fake but accurate" Rathergate
memos? How about the party line circulated in JournoList or the Washington and New York reporters who colluded to
massage the news to favor the Clinton campaign, as revealed in the Podesta WikiLeaks trove? Was jailing a video maker
part of an Obama-administration fake-news attempt to blame Benghazi deaths on a spontaneous riot? Was the Iran Deal's
"echo chamber," about which Ben Rhodes later bragged, the epitome of fake news?
Washington
Post employee posed as ICE agent, police say. A Washington Post employee was arrested last month and charged
with impersonating an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent following an FBI raid, court documents show. Itai
Ozderman, 35, is accused of impersonating an ICE officer throughout Falls Church, Va., on more than one occasion, according
to Montgomery County District Court documents. Police say that he sported a bulletproof vest bearing the ICE logo and,
when the FBI entered his home in Maryland bearing a search warrant, they discovered 10 weapons, including two M4-style
assault rifles and a shotgun. They also found body armor and tactical vests.
Presidential Payback
For Media Hubris. In just his first month in office, reporters have alread peddled dozens of fake news stories designed
to discredit the President — to such a degree that little the now write or say can be taken at face value.
• No, Trump did not have an plans to invade Mexico, as Buzzfeed and the Associated Press alleged.
• No, Trump's father did not run for Mayor of New York by peddling racist television ads, as reported by
Sidne Blumenthal.
• No, there were not mass resignations at the State Department in protest of its new leaders, as was
reported by the Washington Post.
• No, Trump's attorney did not cut a deal with the Russians in Prague. Nor did Trump indulge in sexual
escapades in Moscow. Buzzfeed again peddled those fake news stories.
• No, a supposedly racist Trump did not remove the bust of Martin Luther King Jr. from the White House,
as a Time Magazine reporter claimed.
• No, election results in three states were not altered by hackers or computer criminals to give Trump
the election, as implied by New York Magazine.
• No, Michael Flynn did not tweet that he was a scapegoat. That was a media fantasy endorsed by
Nanc Pelosi.
In fact, Daniel Payne of the Federalist has compiled a length list of sensational stories about Trump's supposed buffooneries,
mistakes, and crudities that all proved either outright lies or were gross exaggerations and distortions.
How
illegal immigrant advocates demonize Trump and terrify people. The New York Times describes 11 million
people — those who are living in the country illegally — as sleepless with anxiety, waiting for the
"fists pounding on the door, the agents in black, the van ride, the cell." Who has thrown such fear into this
community? How about the Left, aided and abetted by the liberal media, which has purposefully distorted President
Trump's immigration policies, characterizing them erroneously as a radical departure from past practices? In a feverish
blast to donors sent out yesterday [2/22/2017], the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee claims that "Donald Trump plans
to add thousands of immigration agents and begin deporting "almost all" undocumented immigrants." That is, excuse the
expression, fake news. Trump is doing no such thing.
How
to Tell if News Is Really News. Wake up, America! You're being had. Start asking the right questions.
How did the Democrats come up with that 40,000,000 uninsured Americans to pass Obamacare? When CNN's Don Lemon asks his panel
about how much the Trump family's secret service is costing taxpayers, ask him where's his research and why didn't he question that
about Michele Obama's huge entourage when she traveled?
Reporting?
Liberal Media Have Much More in Mind Than That. On Nov. 6, Daily Beast feature writer Justin Glawe
pounced on news that a historically black church had been burned down with the words, "Vote Trump" spray-painted on the
"charred remains." Glawe acknowledged that he did not know who had committed the arson, writing that it was "now up to
authorities to find out." Nevertheless, he went on to tie the act into what he termed "the string of violence [by Trump
supporters] against minorities this election season." When in December it was revealed that a black church member with a
criminal record had burned the church down, the Beast merely tacked on an editor's note to the original article and
Glawe penned a follow-up piece in which he noted the arrested man had "liked" Donald Trump on Facebook.
Fake News: Trump Never Said There Was
A 'Terror Attack' Last Night In Sweden. President Trump never said there was a "terror attack" last night
[2/18/2017] in Sweden, but that didn't stop hundreds of fake news outlets from claiming he did. During his rally
Saturday, Trump said: "Here's the bottom line, we've got to keep our country safe. You look at what's
happening. We've got to keep our country safe. You look at what's happening in Germany, you look at what's
happening last night in Sweden. Sweden, who would believe this. Sweden. They took in large numbers.
They're having problems like they never thought possible. You look at what's happening in Brussels, you look at what's
happening all over the world. Take a look at Nice, take a look at Paris." Nowhere did he say there was a "terror
attack." He said "look at what's happening."
Rev.
Graham: Trump Says 'What We All Know ... News Media Has Been Lying' — 'Fake News'. Rev. Franklin Graham said President
Donald Trump is correct about the news media today, that they lie and create "fake news," and added that the media should do what the Bible instructs, "You
shall not circulate a false report" (Exodus 23:1). "President Donald J. Trump has been saying what we all know — that the news
media has been lying," said Rev. Graham in a Feb. 19 post on Facebook. "In today's terminology, creating fake news."
No,
Trump Never Said There Was A Terrorist Attack In Sweden. This weekend the media was awash with stories
suggesting that President Donald Trump claimed that a terrorist attack had recently occurred in Sweden during his speech at
Saturday's [2/18/2017] rally in Melbourne, Florida. Left-wing outlets ran numerous headlines and reports about Trump's
statement, and the story was even a top trending item on Facebook:
Fake
News Rap Sheet: Last Week the MSM Was Caught Telling FORTY Lies. Welcome to week three of "This Week In
Fake News!" [...] You will see one change in this week's list, with respect to the count. Rather than start the count
over every week, this ongoing diary of Fake News will now use a cumulative number, an ongoing count. Put simply, last
week's list contained 24 pieces of Fake News. The week prior was 12. That is a total of 36, so this week we will
start with number 37. This is not meant to be a gimmick. Rather, it is a way to more accurately understand and
comprehend the breathtaking scope of the national media's rabid dishonesty.
It's
Not Fake News, It's Lying, Leftist, Political Propaganda. [I]t wasn't until the press began telling bold-faced lies intended to undermine
and harm the candidacy of Donald Trump that it occurred to me that the press was telling outright lies, intentionally and with malice, in an attempt to
defeat my candidate, Donald Trump, in his run for the presidency. And after he became President the untrue stories got even more outlandish and
more frequent and forceful as the leftist press attempted to destroy President Trump's administration before it could get off the ground. At
this point President Trump began putting a name to it, and it began to resonate with everyone how fabricated liberal news is.
The Crisis in Journalism Is
Here. It's getting harder and harder to kick in the needed amnesia to believe anything that comes from the media.
The Media's
Jihad Against the Trump White House Staff. [Scroll down] The elephant in the room in these stories about
the Trump White House staff is not just that the liberal media can't stand the new president — it can't abide his
agenda. And watching one executive order after another pour out of the Trump White House that is at a 180-degree
variance with the Obama-era and all things far Left, the media reflexively zeroes in on the Trump staff. Thus the
stories. Steve Bannon is really the president. Or, according to Time magazine, which has put him on the cover, he
is "The Great Manipulator" of the President. And he's a white supremacist. Not to mention he's anti-Semitic.
Oh, and by the way, he's incompetent too. Kellyanne Conway ignored Ethics Rules 101. She has no integrity and she
went out of her way to make the rich Ivanka even richer using her public position. And so it goes through the list.
Does this not mean that at any given moment President Trump may in fact have a genuine problem with one of his staffers?
Of course not.
Jeffrey
Toobin Catching On — President Trump's Executive Order Wins by Losing. There are two ways you can
tell when moonbats are losing, one is subtle the other is obvious. A subtle indicator is how the entire MSM apparatus
switched (literally overnight on Thursday [2/10/2017]) from calling President Trump's executive order a "Muslim ban" to
calling it a "Travel Ban".
Fact Check:
Obama Is Not Good at Kite Surfing, Any Sport. A glowing report in the Washington Post claiming former
President Barack Obama is "pretty much a natural on a kiteboard" is filled with factual errors, according to a Washington
Free Beacon fact check. "Obama makes rest of us look bad with his effortless kitesurfing," the headline for a piece
by Kelyn Soong reads. Soong "works in the sports department" at the Washington Post and writes about tennis and
running. [...] "Turns out that was just the beginning of Obama's post-presidency adventures," Soong wrote, explaining that
Branson challenged Obama to see who could stay on a kiteboard or foilboard the longest. "It's well documented that
Obama is pretty good at basketball, but the video proved that the 55-year-old former leader of the free world is pretty much
a natural on a kiteboard, as well," Soong wrote. These claims are false. As the video reveals Obama fell multiple
times off the kiteboard despite "perfect conditions" and practicing for "two days solid" before the challenge.
New
York Times: Our Readers Are Too Dumb To Understand Global Warming Numbers. I recently wrote about the
wretched reporting on the claim that 2016 was the "hottest year on record," using as my main example a New York Times
article by Justin Gillis that gave his readers none of the relevant numbers they could use to evaluate that claim. None
of them. If you search for the actual numbers, you will eventually find that the effect they are claiming, the actual
amount by which this year was hotter than previous years, is smaller than the margin of error in the data. Shortly
afterward, I got a revealing response from Gillis. I'll fill in all the details for you, because the whole thing is an
important case study in why you can't trust mainstream reporting on global warming.
Here's
A List Of Stories The Media Got Wrong This Week. It was an embarrassing week for the mainstream media. In
case after case, stories pushed by news outlets turned out to be either unsubstantiated or fell apart upon closer scrutiny.
20 'Vetted' Refugees Who Turned to Terrorism
After Being Allowed Into America. While the lying media is perpetuating the lie refugees do not pose a terrorist
threat, the facts show otherwise. Senator and soon-to-be Attorney General Jeff Sessions compiled this list of
refugees-turned-jihadists in 2016 while Obama was pushing to dramatically increase the amount of so-called "refugees"
allowed into the United States.
Brzezinski:
Trump Won EV 'Fair and Square' — But He's Not 'Completely Elected By the People'. On Friday's [1/28/2017] broadcast of
MSNBC's "Morning Joe," co-anchor Mika Brzezinski argued that while President Donald Trump won the Electoral vote fairly, "this is a president who
lost to Hillary Clinton... I think there's a lot of support he still needs to gain. It's not a president completely elected by the people."
President
Trump Should Dump The Media. Trust ratings and approval levels for the media are so far down in the toilet that
it would take a plumber to find them. If the media are the people's representatives, then the people want to elect
different ones. Those are some of the same representatives that the media is trying to ban from social media with a
fake "Fake News Crusade" and by resisting any expansion of press briefings with threats and warnings. "We'll have to
consider doing things other than protesting and whining," Fournier threatened. "We'll have to think about what we can
do to bring some pain to make our point." Do what? Run items accusing President Trump of being a traitor, a liar, a
racist, a rapist and a Batman villain? The media has already done all of those. What else is it going to except shout
more lies even louder? Within a brief span of time, the media's fake news operation claimed that Trump had banished the bust
of MLK, lifted quotes from a Batman villain and had been cavorting with Russian prostitutes. And that he was a compulsive
liar. That last accusation is notably hilarious considering the honesty and integrity of the media.
Three
Mainstream Media Lies on Trump's First Day. The mainstream media lost no time in attempting to undermine
President Donald Trump, as opposed to actually reporting information. After eight years of kowtowing to Obama, they
have suddenly discovered a civic responsibility to hold the government accountable. But they are focusing on minutiae,
and in some cases actually telling lies, both of omission and commission. That risks alienating the public even
further — making it harder, actually, for the media to act as watchdogs.
MSM
reporter falsely claimed that Trump had MLK bust removed from Oval Office. Sure everybody makes mistakes, but
making a sensational false charge against a new president at the very first opportunity he allowed reporters into his Oval
Office on Day One of his presidency sure looks like one of those narrative-confirming, "too-good-to-check" stories of
journalistic lore that just happens to portray Trump as a racist "white nationalist" in the eyes of progressives. Zeke
Miller of Time was allowed into the Oval Office as a pool reporter and tweeted out reports that the Churchill bust was back
(true) and the MLK bust was gone (false).
Why NYT Hid
The Numbers For The 'Hottest Year On Record'. [W]hen you read an article proclaiming that, for the third year
in a row, last year was the hottest year on record, you might expect that right up front you will get numbers, measurements,
and a statistical margin of error. [...] I just got done combing through a New York Times report titled, "Earth Sets a
Temperature Record for the Third Straight Year." The number of relevant numbers in this article is: zero. We
are not told what the average global temperature was, how much higher this is than last year's record or any previous records,
or what the margin of error is supposed to be on those measurements. Instead, we get stuff like this. [...]
Atlanta
Journal-Constitution Botches Crime Stats in Defending John Lewis. On Friday, Georgia Congressman John Lewis,
whose 5th District includes the City of Atlanta, said of Donald Trump that "I don't see the president-elect as a legitimate
president." Trump characteristically fired back with a two-part tweet suggesting that Lewis "... spend more time on fixing
and helping his district, which is in horrible shape and falling apart (not to mention crime infested) rather than falsely
complaining about the election results." As would be expected, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution rushed to Lewis's
defense. In its apparent haste to do so, a pair of journalists at the paper committed a colossal math blunder vastly
understating the city's crime rate. With that mistake, the paper made the city look over 13 times safer than
it really is.
Fake
News About the Office of Congressional Ethics. The mainstream media are abuzz with claims that House Republicans
have voted to "gut" or "eviscerate" the Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE), or to strip it of its independence. Perpetual
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) claimed Republicans had "eliminated" the oversight body, and linked the move to
President-elect Donald Trump, claiming that the House Republicans' move represents a violation of Trump's campaign promise to
"drain the swamp" in Washington. The story qualifies as "fake news," and the fact that it is being repeated by so many
outlets does not make the it any less fake.
BBC
Finally Admits Its Famous 'Women Write Better Code' Story Was Fake News. When the issue of "fake news" came to
prominence at the end of this year's election cycle, traditional media outlets were the firsts to engage in relentless
finger-pointing. Journalists everywhere deplored the spread of misleading, lazily reported and, in some cases, totally
fabricated stories that had been facilitated by social media. That'd be ignoring — of course —
that in a competitive media climate where virality and accuracy go head-to-head, editors will often go for a catchier headline,
at the expense of factual accuracy. And as one writer at HEqual noted, even the respectable BBC is not immune from this
kind of sensationalism.
Top
Ten Most Under Reported Stories of 2016. [#2] The wipe-out of the corporate media apparatus: It is understandable
why the media would choose not to report on their own irrelevance; yet that doesn't mean their irrelevance is any less a story.
Arguably you could make the complete collapse of the U.S. corporate and legacy media the #1 story of this entire election cycle.
Never before has any single political election so thoroughly, completely and visibly destroyed the credibility of print or broadcast
journalism. Collectively and individually they will never recover from the continual abject and transparent falsehoods they
promoted in each and every hour of their coverage, and in almost every column inch of their publications. Put a fork in them,
they are all done — and they did it to themselves, repeatedly.
Fake
News: Family Didn't 'Flee Town' over Breitbart Story That Doesn't Mention Them. If you read through the world of left-wing
clickbait Thursday afternoon [12/22/2016], you may have seen a shocking story about a Jewish family chased out of town by anti-Semitic Breitbart
readers because our site blamed them for shutting down a school's Christmas play. Scary stuff — except that version of the
story is 100% fake news.
ADL: 'No truth' to
story about Jewish family fleeing Pa. over Christmas play. The Anti-Defamation League said Thursday that a
widely circulated story that a Pennsylvania Jewish family fled their home after being blamed for the cancellation of a school
Christmas play was false. After investigating, the ADL said, it found the family had gone on vacation. "News
reports alleging that a Jewish family has 'fled' Lancaster County are untrue and damaging," ADL Regional Director Nancy
Baron-Baer said in a statement. "We spoke with the family, who explained that they went on a previously-planned
vacation for the holidays. Stories like this can sow fear in the Jewish community and beyond, and it is important to
stop the spread of misinformation."
Kurt
Eichenwald Further Explains His Claim That Trump Was Institutionalized. [Scroll down] So: Eichenwald was making
a joke, and "signalling to a source," but he also really believes that Trump was institutionalized in 1990. The problem is that he can't
prove it — it's merely "reporting process" — so he hasn't said so publicly. Except for when he did say so
publicly, but that doesn't count because he really doesn't like Tucker Carlson. Now we know. If Eichenwald genuinely believes
that Tucker prevented him from explaining all of this on the air, then I'm glad to help make things right.
Can You Trust the Press? No.
Judith Miller, formerly of the New York Times, explains why we cannot trust the fake news vomited forth by the leftist
"mainstream" information gatekeepers: [Video clip]
4
Reasons Russia Didn't Swing The Election To Trump. Democrats are over the moon about the new Washington Post
report that quotes CIA sources who say that Vladimir Putin and the Russian government actively attempted to aid Donald Trump
in his election race against Hillary Clinton. Many Democrats have been making the claim that if not for Putin's
intervention — if not for Russian hackers accessing emails from Hillary campaign chief John Podesta and then
releasing them via WikiLeaks for months — Hillary Clinton would today be the president-elect. There's no
evidence to support that. There is plenty of evidence to support the contrary notion, actually.
The King of Fake News. The
liberals would love to do away with free speech, as Hillary Clinton would have if she'd been elected and could have packed
the Supreme Court with liberals who would have reversed the Citizens United decision and others protecting free speech. But
the best way to do away with about 99 percent of the "fake news" that is broadcast and printed is for the liberals and
their media allies to stop creating it. Fake news — propaganda — is often risible and easily recognized.
When the North Korean government described the first time Kim Jong-Il (father of Kim Jong-Loon, the current dictator) went golfing,
they broadcast that he scored a hole-in-one five times in one round of golf. These days, the liberal media don't wait for
enemy governments to make stuff up. They do it themselves.
How a
free press became fake. If one wonders why American audiences are reposting fake news rather than purchasing
subscriptions to the Washington Post, look no further. When the free press falls into disrepair, readers click
elsewhere. Just as the electorate rejected elites at the ballot box in November, so audiences are ditching the
establishment news media. They're tired of journalists accepting fluff for fact, lecturing instead of reporting, and
getting the story plain wrong.
MSNBC
Host Apologizes For Falsely Claiming Fox News Held Its Christmas Party at Trump Hotel. This morning, MSNBC host
Stephanie Ruhle accused Fox News of holding its Christmas party at President-elect Donald Trump's recently opened Washington
hotel. The comment was part of a discussion revolving around potential conflicts of interest the incoming POTUS may
have when it comes to his businesses. The only problem was that Fox News has not even held its annual party yet and the
upcoming party they've scheduled will be at a different hotel that isn't affiliated with Trump.
Sheriff
Clarke: Liberal Media Created Fake News With 'Hands Up Don't Shoot' Lie. Liberal journalists and
activists spread far and wide the myth that Michael Brown had his hands up before being gunned down by police officer Darren
Wilson. That claim was the origin of the Black Lives Matter movement and eventually lead to violent rioting in
Ferguson. The facts of the case showed the 'Hands up don't shoot' claim to be false and that Wilson was justified in
shooting Brown.
Lies,
[...] and LA Times editorials. The Left, having no value for truth, honesty, integrity, or anything else
besides getting their way of course, has no problem with printing absolute falsehoods like the ones in this editorial
bemoaning the prospect of national concealed carry reciprocity. It seems the Times is aggrieved that liberty and
greater ability to self-defense might soon be coming[.]
Zakaria:
'Working-Class Whites' Vote On Emotion, Not Policy. Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign did not fail as a result of its
subscription to unpopular left-wing policies, said left-wing CNN's Fareed Zakaria on Sunday's [12/4/2016] GPS. As is his custom, his
introductory monologue was a reading of his weekly column at left-wing news outlet The Washington Post. Despite declaring Hillary
Clinton's victory as inevitable on October 16 ("Let's be clear. Donald Trump will lose the election."), Zakaria now claims to
understand President-elect Donald Trump's appeal. He also now claims to know what Clinton could have done to win the
presidency. American voters aren't driven by policy, said Zakaria, but by emotion: [...]
Democrats,
Not Trump, Racialize Our Politics. The most absurd Democratic meme to emerge from the party's ballot-box defeat
is the claim that it is Donald Trump, rather than Democrats, who engages in "aggressive, racialized discourse," in the
words of a Los Angeles Times op-ed. By contrast, President Barack Obama sought a "post-racial, bridge-building
society," according to New York Times reporter Peter Baker. Obama's post-racial efforts have now "given way to
an angry, jeering, us-against-them nation," writes Baker, in a front-page "news" story. Tell that valedictory for
"post-racial bridge-building" to police officers, who have been living through two years of racialized hatred directed at
them in the streets, to the applause of many Democratic politicians.
Boycott Frosted
Flakes! Liberal bullies are trying to pressure advertisers into boycotting Breitbart.com, one of the most
popular conservative sites on the internet. [...] Most CEOs of large companies are liberals, as are nearly all PR employees
of such companies. So this kind of response comes naturally. The AP helpfully explains: ["]Breitbart
has been condemned for featuring racist, sexist and anti-Semitic content.["] Really? Condemned by
whom? For what? The AP ritually recites these allegations against the site without citing any evidence
whatsoever. The claims are false, if not ridiculous. But readers who rely on America's daily newspapers
won't know this.
The Fake
Arbiters of "Fake News". As everyone already knows, on Friday the business section of The Washington Post
published an article about so-called "fake news" propagated on the Internet. The Russian propaganda services are said
to be behind this disinformation, with many American websites helping to spread it, deliberately or otherwise. One of
the WaPo's principal sources for the story was a website called "PropOrNot". For some reason the author, Craig Timberg,
failed to link the site, although he linked many others. However, in its post on the piece, Zero Hedge provides a link
to the 200 "fake news" websites listed by PropOrNot. Gates of Vienna was not illustrious enough to make the Post's
article, but PropOrNot has honored us by including us in the list of sites that retail "fake news".
'Fake
news' isn't the problem — mainstream news with an agenda is. "Fake news" has been a big news story
for the past week. Hoaxes and fabrications hatched by clickbait-hungry websites — or, some reports say, by
the Kremlin propaganda machine — have been blamed for Donald Trump's election victory. Leading journalists
such as CNN's Christiane Amanpour have decried the profession's "existential crisis" caused by the onslaught of fake
stories. Google and Facebook have both moved to curb the problem by denying advertising to "fake news" sites.
Meanwhile, critics on both the left and the right argue that the outcry about "fake news" is a manufactured crisis intended
to smear and ostracize dissident, non-mainstream media — especially since some of the critiques lump together
publications that contain real if slanted reporting, such as Breitbart News or Antiwar.com, with sites that publish actual
hoaxes (such as a story about Pope Francis endorsing Trump) or satire. Critics also charge that the "fake news" trope
obscures the fact that the mainstream media have their own problem with false or misleading stories.
Fake News.
The success of "fake news" is inextricably linked to the state of credibility of the media. Fake news would get no
purchase if the media's credibility were high. But surveys showed it has been declining for years and the Russians
could not have helped but notice. They very cleverly exploited the fact that news organizations were increasingly used
by politicians to spread lies. Talking Points, which made the coordination of lies easier, also made them easier to detect.
32
Times Establishment Media and Pollsters Assured the People of Donald Trump's Defeat. From the time Donald Trump
announced his White House bid, there has been no shortage of establishment media outlets predicting his defeat. Indeed,
as the weeks and months marked Trump's ever-apparent political preeminence, the pundits, pollsters, and prognosticators
doubted and declared his collapse inevitable. Even as Trump, a real estate mogul-turned-reality TV star, clinched the
Republican presidential nomination, the affirmations of his failure kept coming. The very establishment media and
pollsters who benefitted from Trump's celebrity before branding him leader of a deplorable political base will stand against
his governance.
Chicago
Tribune: Obama has been Pro Second Amendment! Steve Chapman is a writer for the Chicago Tribune.
He has often written about gun legislation. He stands out at the Tribune as a voice that recognizes reality more often
then most. His writing and viewpoints have been a reasonable voice crying in the wilderness of Chicago.
Unfortunately, he lives in the fantasy bubble of current Progressivism. It is evident in his recent column excoriating
the NRA. He buys into the leftist propaganda without introspection or examination of facts. It is an opinion
column, but opinions should have a basis in reality.
Speaking
Of Fake News, The 'Muslim Registry'. Donald Trump has never called for a "Muslim registry," and any story
claiming otherwise should be relegated to the pile of "fake news" the media is so concerned about right now. The hysterical
headlines claiming Trump and his surrogates are preparing to force all Muslims in the country to register perhaps reached their
climax in this Washington Post headline Friday: "They interned my family. Don't let them do it to Muslims."
Crying
and lying: Hysteria and repeated false claims showered upon us by the left. Greg Gutfeld brutally calls
out the left and the fake cable news shows that push out the false narratives and refuse to investigate the veracity of the
claims that pass over their airwaves. Remarkable is the stream of claims that America is now tainted by the Trump
supporters and their hateful antics. Case after case is blurted across the left leaning cable shows. But it
seems there is never a corroboration or proof of the incidents so claimed.
Drown Out
the Lying MSM. Older readers may remember an era when the media generally reported facts and left spin to the
mind of the viewer, or at least wasn't so crookedly biased. In accurately predicting President-Elect Trump's victorious
path through Michigan and Pennsylvania, I indicated that the media was distorting polling numbers deliberately to keep Trump
supporters from bothering to vote. While Trump won an electoral landslide, only a relatively small chunk of votes made
the difference in those two states and in Florida. Yes, the lying, propagandizing jackals in media nearly won the election
for Clinton. They decided to hang together up until the bitter end, and are now predictably circling the wagons trying to
figure out what went wrong. Everyone knew there was a secret Trump vote, and they still lied. [...] Do you enjoy being
lied to? Or do you have to watch sports so badly that you're willing to fork over $150 per month for a cable or dish
subscription that directly funds people who hate you and everything you believe in and want to mislead you, all while insulting
you to your face?
There Is No Violent
Hate-Crimewave in 'Trump's America'. [W]hile all sorts of horrible incidents are being reported on Twitter and
Facebook... well, anyone can say anything on Twitter and Facebook. The bulk of these stories are "friend of a friend"
told me types. But if men were really going around pulling knives on Muslim women on public buses in Trump's name,
there would at least be local or campus news reports of it. Same, too, for the alleged wave of transgender teen
suicides which keep getting mentioned in media but for which no one can offer any evidence.
Really? Do you have 'Hundreds' of pictures? Brian
Stelter: 'Hundreds' Of Swastikas, Racist Attacks After Trump Win. In little-noticed remarks Saturday [11/12/2016], "Reliable
Sources" host Brian Stelter Saturday [11/12/2016] parroted data from the Southern Poverty Law Center, claiming that there have been
"hundreds of cases of swastikas, of racist language, of harassment, of in some cases, assaults and bullying across this country"
since Donald Trump was elected.
An
Important Post-Election Message About Media Polling. The media didn't get it wrong. The pollsters did
not work from the wrong data set; the media pollsters, consultants and professional political class did not work from the
wrong assumptions, or use the incorrect baselines. THEY LIED. The professional media polling agents knew exactly
what the truth was. They lied and manipulated their data in a concerted effort to intentionally falsify reality. There should
be no doubt, EVER, in the mind of any political observer as to what took place within the expressed and broadcasted polling which fueled
over two years of broadcast news. The media intentionally lied. They knew the truth. The same tools available
to us, and to those who were ridiculed for truth-telling, were available to them and many more. They did not get it wrong.
They chose to lie to you the American electorate.
The
real election surprise? The uprising of the American people. [Scroll down] The political class and
the mainstream media have a narrative that Trump's late surge is the result of an intervention by FBI Director James
Comey. That narrative, like every one they've had over this cycle, couldn't be more wrong. The momentum of the
election was already moving toward Trump before Comey's announcement to reopen of the Clinton email investigation.
That event, like the presidential debate in 1980, tended to accelerate what was already in motion.
On
The Upside, At Least This Election Will Destroy The Media. Liberal journalists, by which I mean journalists, do not think you should know things
that hurt their favored candidate. This is an interesting new take on the whole idea of "news reporting," an innovative rethink that refocuses journalists
less on ensuring people hear the news and instead focuses on ensuring they only hear certain news that, incidentally, supports the media's progressive political
agenda. So we get fact checking that involves neither facts nor checking.
The
Media Must Be Dismantled In Order For Freedom To Survive. News has always been biased, but the American media
exists for one reason and one reason only in 2016 — to further the agenda of the corporate-government complex
a.k.a. the globalists. [...] You will never get any truth from the media when it comes to politics and many other issues.
[...] I have personally not watched television in over a year since leaving the news industry, and my mind is more focused
than it has ever been in my life. I will likely never own another television in my life.
How
'Convicted Criminal' James O'Keefe Came to Be 'Discredited'. [Anderson] Cooper introduced the videos by
sniffing at O'Keefe's "less than stellar reputation for accuracy." As inevitably happens, he cited no examples of O'Keefe's
inaccuracies. Cooper then turned the task over to CNN "investigative reporter" Drew Griffin who promptly upped the
libel ante by referring to O'Keefe as a "discredited conservative activist." Again, there was no effort to prove the
"discredited" label or the "conservative" one, for that matter.
Debunking the Vicious False
Narratives against Donald Trump. By now, every voter knows that the mainstream media is in the pocket of
Hillary Clinton but many do not know the extent of the malpractice in journalism today. The MSM has successfully
embedded in the minds of the voters false narratives that need to be exposed out of just plain common decency. The
three I will address in this piece are the charges that Trump mocked a disabled reporter; that he questioned the Mexican
American's legitimacy to handle his court case because of his race, and that he mocked a Gold Star family. There are
many more.
Ex-NY
Times Public Editor Aghast That Anyone Thinks Times Reporters Make Stuff Up. GOP nominee Donald Trump is
alleging the game is rigged against him from a disturbing combo of inevitable voting fraud and slanted media coverage of the
campaign. Predictably, media stalwarts blithely dismiss Trump's allegation as paranoid and delusional. Perhaps
they should not be so quick to laugh it off, given the media's track record when it comes to fiction fobbed off as journalism.
Liberty students less divided over Trump than MSM claims.
Mainstream media reports portray Liberty University students as turning against Donald Trump, but a current student says this
is just an exaggeration meant to divide the student body.
Alicia
Machado Is 2016's Sandra Fluke, A Democratic Public Relations Scam. Sandra Fluke became the centerpiece of the
Democrats' "War on Women" messaging that they pounded throughout the year. The media completely ate it up, hook, line, and
sinker. Within minutes, she was put on every major network and cable outlet. The media ran with stories about how women
weren't allowed to testify at the hearing, even though two female college administrators — Dr. Allison Dabbs Garrett, the
senior vice-president for academic affairs at Oklahoma Christian University, and Dr. Laura Champion, medical director of Calvin
College Health Services — testified. The facts were no barrier to the headlines, which included CBS' "Dems decry
all-male House panel on WH contraception rule" and CNN's "Angry lawmakers challenge lineup at hearing: 'Where are the women?'"
Hillary's
Pneumonia Hokum: A Timeline. [Scroll down] Some of the dinosaur media have reported that Hillary "stumbled at the curb" and
"fell into the van." Others reported that she "fainted." This shows the extremely low quality of "journalism" today,
describing things that just didn't happen, as you can see for yourself in the video. Hillary didn't "stumble";she buckled
at the knees. She didn't "faint" (lose consciousness and go limp). Hillary herself says she didn't faint, and for once
she might be telling the truth, because the video shows that she was apparently awake but immobile. She was having a seizure
of some kind.
Dear
Media: Please Stop Calling Violent Rioters 'Protesters'. Watching coverage of the unrest in Charlotte,
North Carolina last night, I was struck by a common trend in how the most violent acts were being covered. [...] Looting a
Wal-Mart, destruction of property, attempted murder, all carried out by... "protesters." [...] I suppose you could make a
convoluted argument about how the protests were against white supremacy, and capitalism and the media are agents of white
supremacy, therefore attacking those institutions are acts of "protest" or whatever. But if even violent attempted
murder and destruction of property can be a "protest" so long as the motives are political, I don't see why the same can't
be said of, say, a terrorist attack.
MSNBC:
Republicans Purging Minorities to Steal Election, Hack Results. MSNBC's Joy Reid, who was swift to condemn
Republican concerns of voter fraud, was equally as fast at accusing them of plotting to steal the election. Reid's
concern centered on a computer system called CrossCheck which was developed to find duplicate names on the voter rolls so
they can be removed. But Reid and her guest Rolling Stone writer Greg Palast, who brought the issue to her
attention, accuse the system of targeting minorities. "The system disproportionality targets voters of color who are
likely to have common surnames, like Washington or Hernandez," Reid stated.
Media
Invented Lie About Trump Mocking Disabled Reporter. Just when you think the media could not possibly become more loathsome, the
Fourth Estate bullies prove you wrong again. The Washington Post's latest ugliness was to exploit the disability of a newspaper reporter
in order to smear the Republican nominee for president. Then — and this is the least surprising part of the story —
the Post lied about it.
National
NBC Reporter Claims "Trump Rally Crowds Small" — Despite Akron Ohio Max Capacity Crowd 5,000+. The
trust in U.S. journalism is at a historic low. Most Americans now accept the U.S. media is completely dishonest.
However, the media reporters claim such public opinions are unwarranted. [...] Any objective observer of the news media's
treatment of Trump can certainly conclude that reporters are taking a side in this election — and they don't have
to be wearing a button that says "I'm with her" for this to be readily apparent.
Almost
Everything the Media Tell You About Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Is Wrong. A major new report,
published today [8/22/2016] in the journal The New Atlantis, challenges the leading narratives that the media has pushed
regarding sexual orientation and gender identity. Co-authored by two of the nation's leading scholars on mental health
and sexuality, the 143-page report discusses over 200 peer-reviewed studies in the biological, psychological, and social
sciences, painstakingly documenting what scientific research shows and does not show about sexuality and gender. The
major takeaway, as the editor of the journal explains, is that "some of the most frequently heard claims about sexuality and
gender are not supported by scientific evidence."
Media
Matters fabricates quote from Robert Spencer, claims he runs "white nationalist think tank". Did you know I was
a "white nationalist think tank leader"? Neither did I. I didn't know I was a white nationalist, and didn't know I ran a
think tank. Just think of all the meetings I've missed. [...] Media Matters claims to correct the lies of the Right.
In fact, it is they who are the liars.
Black
males murder five year old white girl in Milwaukee. No national outrage. Two black males in Milwaukee
walked up to the home of a white family, in a majority black neighborhood, and unleashed a hail of gunfire. A five year
old white girl, Laylah Petersen, was murdered while sitting on her grandfather's lap. Milwaukee police say there is no
question the shooters were deliberating trying to kill people inside the house. At least a dozen bullets were fired
directly into the house. There may have been a third person driving a getaway car. The house was located in a
census tract that is 77% black and 14% white. The Milwaukee Sentinel and Milwaukee channel 6 have actually been
trying to downplay the murder. They are falsly reporting that it was "a stray bullet." That directly contradicts
all the evidence found by police.
Megan
Twohey of the New York Times Caught in a Media Hoax. Megan Twohey of the New York Times offers you a master
class in how to spot a liar. Megan Twohey along with "journalist" Michael Barbaro recently published a hit on Donald
Trump. In their article, ["]Crossing the Line: How Donald Trump Behaved with Women in Public["], Twohey and
Barbaro accused Trump of conduct varying from sexual harassment to "debasing" of women. The problem? The story
was a hoax!
The
Media Are Lying to Hide Clinton's Animosity to the Second Amendment. This is the state of "journalism"
today. Members of the media who desperately want Hillary Clinton to be elected president are stooping to unprecedented
lows, abandoning all pretenses of impartiality, forfeiting whatever remnant of credibility they might otherwise have, trying
to prevent voters from realizing that Hillary Clinton fundamentally opposes the individual right to keep and bear arms.
The Washington Post, to single out one of the worst in this regard, is worried that voters agree with Republican presidential
candidate Donald Trump that if Clinton were elected, she would "essentially abolish the Second Amendment."
The Misinformation Age. The thing is, our mass media culture is
mostly fabricated nonsense. Most of what the news people "report" is made up. As soon as you see the word "sources" you know what
follows is invented. Even when someone is named as a source, nine times out of ten we learn that the named source did not actually say what he
was claimed to have said. The other day, the news people were claiming Trump got in a fight with a baby at one of his events. It turns out
he made some harmless jokes about a crying baby.
The media's lies and
double standards accelerate at blinding speed. [Scroll down] As a senator, Mrs. Clinton had voted for the Iraq war and refused to support
the military surge that turned the war around, and as secretary of state, she supported President Obama's precipitous withdrawal from Iraq, which
created the vacuum into which the Islamic State stepped, and failed to honor repeated requests for greater security in Benghazi, all while
Mr. Trump was a private citizen. But according to Mr. Khan, Mr. Trump is the villain: "Donald Trump consistently
smears the character of Muslims," he said. "He disrespects other minorities, women, judges, even his own party leadership. He vows
to build walls and ban us from this country." Another untruth. Rather than "ban Muslims" from entering the country, Mr. Trump proposes
a temporary hold on those coming from nations "compromised" by Islamic terrorism and once the situation is in hand, thorough background checks on
all immigrants coming from those areas. Mr. Khan also wondered if Mr. Trump had "read the Constitution." Never mind that the
Constitution does not offer religious freedom protections to non-citizens and that as a matter of law and policy, we are not obligated to let anyone
into the country. Throughout his time in the spotlight, Mr. Khan parroted the media's distortions, and they ate it up.
Media
Photoshops Crowd Image For Hillary Clinton St. Petersburg, Florida Speech. Remember the discussions of
"optics" and trying to manufacture the perception of support for Hillary Clinton? It's all a pretense; a fraud; a
corporate media ruse. Well, a great example comes today from "The Hill", an on-line media outlet promoting the speech
of candidate Clinton.
The Media vs.
America. The other night I spent some time with Donald Trump. He had come to Cumberland Valley High
School in Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania, a mere five or so miles up the road from my house. The Trump rally was
filled — completely — with thousands inside and outside thousands more waiting (in vain) to get in the door.
Here's what interested. Never once — not once — did I hear Donald Trump mention the Khans, the now famous
parents of a son killed in battle in Iraq. Even more to the point? In talking with many people in the audience
before and after the rally, no one — say again not a single soul — mentioned the Khans. What I did hear
from Trump was talk about jobs, trade, the economy, ISIS and more. Which was the talk from members of the audience when
I spoke to many of them before and after the rally. They volunteered directly to me, conversation after another, their
thoughts about ObamaCare, a sick child, jobs, trade, pride in America, Hillary and so on. And yet?
Mysteriously when I returned home and turned on the television or checked on-line it seemed to be all-Khan all-the-time.
As if Trump had spent the evening re-hashing the whole subject yet again. Which he had not.
Exclusive:
NBC Quietly Scrubs 'Discredited' Smear of Bill Clinton Rape Accuser. Following the receipt of a retraction
demand, NBC News has quietly edited the Internet edition of a segment that aired on the highly-rated "Today Show" in which
anchor Andrea Mitchell claimed Juanita Broaddrick's rape accusation against Bill Clinton had been "discredited." After
receiving the legal letter, penned by Broaddrick's attorney and son, Kevin L. Hickey, NBC removed the word "discredited"
from the network's Internet version of Mitchell's video report, Broaddrick and Hickey told this reporter. However, NBC
did not make any indication of the edit in the video or on the webpage that hosts it.
Free
Beacon Catches NBC Scrubbing Old Video of Mitchell Saying Juanita Broaddrick Is 'Discredited'. In a breaking
story posted late Tuesday afternoon [8/2/2016] by our friends at the Washington Free Beacon, staff writer and former CNS News
staff writer Elizabeth Harrington revealed that NBC News has stealth edited a May 19 video of Clinton campaign correspondent
Andrea Mitchell on Today denouncing Juanita Broaddrick's sexual allegations against Bill Clinton as "a discredited and
long-denied accusation" to merely being a "long-denied accusation." Mitchell's original phrasing was flagged the day that
it aired live on NBC by the MRC's Kyle Drennen and he chronicled the network's history concerning Broaddrick and Clinton.
Media
Hoax! Dishonest Journalists Claim Alex Jones was Arrested. The mainstream media was at it again, this
time attempting to hoax the world by claiming Alex Jones had been arrested for punching a black cop. The truth is that
SJWs assaulted him. I know because I was there filming the entire event. At a small gathering of discontents,
Alex Jones appeared with his bull horn explaining how the protesters were globalist tools of George Soros. As Jones
approached the group, they attacked him. Police intervened, separating the two groups. Yet the media began
spreading a hoax, claiming Jones assaulted a black police officer.
Website Gets
Busted Trying to Cover Obama's Lies. Rumor-disproving website Snopes has proven itself especially unreliable on
all matters political, and it did so again this week when it tried to "bust" the myth that President Obama had paid Iran
$400 million in exchange for American citizens being held in Iranian jails. Both Snopes and the Obama administration
insist that the payment was part of the Iran nuclear deal and completely unconnected to the release of the men.
Misleading
Headline of the Month: AP "Man who shot sleeping intruder". The above headline must be one of the most
misleading that I have seen. It comes from AP itself. It is aided and abbetted by the AP leading sentence.
From the washingtontimes.com: ["]BEND, Ore. (AP) - The man who shot and killed another person asleep inside a Bend
home in 2012 is asking a court to throw out a wrongful death lawsuit against him.["] The intruder was not sleeping.
He was actively fighting the couple that found him asleep in the homeowners house. There was an extensive investigation, and the
shooting was ruled justified. The story is all over the Internets, with the factually wrong headline and first sentence.
So
Much for That 'Unprecedented' Jail Talk. The Republican convention's rowdy chants about Hillary Clinton — "Lock her
up!" — have caused liberal journalists to get extremely distressed. In their lead editorial on July 21, The Washington
Post fulminated that Team Trump's "descent from standard red-meat partisanship to unprecedented accusations of criminality displays contempt
for the rule of law and a startling disinterest in fact and reason." That's strong brew. It's too bad for them that it's completely
false. Somehow, the Post writers are acting like they were born yesterday, or slept through the last Republican presidency.
They've chosen to overlook that their liberal friends in news and entertainment were active participants in an eight-year anti-GOP hatefest.
Take CNN commentator Jack Cafferty, who on October 17, 2005, gushed to Wolf Blitzer about the idea of Karl Rove in prison: [...]
How
The Media Covers Up Muslim And #Blacklivesmatter Terrorism. The propaganda, the artful selection and deselection of facts, have
become as familiar to us as they were to any of the residents of the Soviet Union or North Korea. Anyone who pays attention knows not
only that they are being lied to, but can easily predict the lies that they will be told on the evening news even before they actually hear
them being spoken out loud. We always knew that the Muslim terrorist, even before he was identified, would turn out to be a secular
loner who was depressed over his family life. All the media had to do with Mohammed Bouhlel, the Islamic terrorist who murdered
84 people in Nice, France was to replay the same exact narrative as the one that they had fed us with Omar Mateen, the Islamic terrorist
who murdered 49 people in Orlando. Irreligious, depressed loner with family problems. Check. No connection to Islamic
terrorism. Suggestion of mental illness. Check and check. Insistence on his lack of interest in religion? One final check.
MSNBC's
'truck crash' framing of France terror attack ignites Twitter mockery. An MSNBC tweet on late Thursday [7/14/2016] that framed
France's latest terror attack as a "truck crash" elicited a stinging response from readers. "Follow our live blog for the latest from
Nice after a truck crash leaves at least 70 dead," the network tweeted at 8:49 p.m. EST., well after even President Obama and
French President Francois Hollande called the event an act of terrorism. Mohamed Lahouaiej Bouhlel, 31, killed at least 84 people
during Bastille Day ceremonies by plowing a giant truck through crowds along the Promenade des Anglais.
Media
blames truck, not terrorists or Islam, for Nice attack. Leftist media outlets reacted to the devastating attack
in Nice not by blaming Islam or even terrorists, but by suggesting that an inanimate object — the truck —
was responsible for the carnage. Instead of pointing the finger at Islamists, CNN, CBC and the New York Times all published
headlines that served to hide the true nature of the attack. CBC reported, "Children feared killed in Nice as truck attacks
family event". Presumably, the truck was somehow able to manifest artificial intelligence and plough itself through dozens
of victims.
When
liberal narratives override the facts. Here we go again. Yet another hotly reported media narrative
stamps itself on the national dialogue only to find — oops! — maybe there are actually more facts to be
discovered before we know, as they say, "the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth." This time around the
media narrative surrounds the Minnesota shooting by St. Anthony Village Police Department officer Jeronimo Yanez, the
shooting victim one Philando Castile.
Shocker!
It Looks Like the Media May Have Bought a False Narrative in Philando Castile Shooting. If there is one thing
I've learned about media firestorms in the modern age of one-hour news cycles and 15-second attention spans, it's that
whoever tells the first story which the news media likes is the "winner." Once the narrative is set in stone (when the news
media works in unison that takes about two days, tops), the truth will face a battle that is severely uphill, into the wind,
on ice, and will almost never prevail. There was no better example of this sad reality than the "Hands Up! Don't
Shoot!" myth which drove the entire Ferguson fiasco and was the origin of the entire "Black Lives Matter" movement.
Every investigation into the matter (including by the Obama administration) later concluded, against self-interest, that this
catchphrase was based on an obvious and despicable lie. However, even that did almost nothing to alter public perceptions
of that event or the media's eagerness to give instant credibility to similar claims from the same groups in the future.
Update: Woman
Who Famously Live-Streamed Her Boyfriend's Police Shooting is Arrested for Hammer Attack. Diamond Reynolds, the woman who famously live-streamed
the controversial fatal police shooting of Philando Castile, has been arrested in connection with a vicious attack that left another woman with serious injuries.
Reynolds, Dyamond Richardson, and Chnika Blair were apprehended Thursday [3/23/2107] in St. Paul, Minnesota, after allegedly attacking a woman with a hammer
Tuesday night [2/28/2017], and leaving the scene in a silver truck.
Media
Ignore the Tsunami of Black Violence against Cops. The shootings in Dallas did not make much of a difference. Not to the
reporters explaining the protest and the reason behind the assassination of five police officers. The reason for the demonstration was
simple and beyond pushback: White cops shoot black people all over the country, all the time, for no reason whatsoever.
Everybody knows that. So sad. Some took it to the next level: The head of a black group called Dallas Action said the
killings were a wake up call to let people know how cops are picking on black people. All the time. For no reason
whatsoever. The local Fox reporter in Dallas took the comments in stride, quickly changing the topic to all the pretty lights on
nearby police cars. Not one reporter at any point even hinted at how black violence is wildly out of proportion.
Betrayed
by an America-hating press. The press lie constantly, and their lies are exposed every day by conservative radio and
opinion sites. Lying to the public is a basic betrayal of a vital survival function in a democratic republic, a true stab in
the back. [...] In J schools in this country, "betrayal" of the basic obligations of journalism has a name. It's called
"advocacy journalism," but it means lying to every single American.
The
Democrats' Self-Serving Distractions. After the massacre at a gay club in Orlando, Fla., by an American Muslim
of Afghan origin affiliated with the Islamic State, the editors of the New York Times argued that the fundamental
problem was "hate" exemplified by ... opponents of same-sex marriage. That was an interesting line of argument.
Omar Mateen was not found with a natural-law treatise in his back pocket, and he wasn't fresh from a Princeton seminar with
Robert George. He never suggested that the Supreme Court had taken too broad a view of the 14th Amendment in
Obergefell v. Hodges. He was a Muslim fanatic whose heroes throw homosexuals off of tall buildings and
crucify Christians. The morning after that massacre, the New York Daily News reported the enormity under the
headline: "Thanks, NRA!"
Here's
The Media's Latest Attempt To Downplay Radical Islam After Orlando Attack. Ever since witnesses started coming
out of the woodwork in the wake of the Orlando attack, claiming that shooter Omar Mateen had actually led a secret gay
lifestyle, the liberal media has been desperately trying to portray the massacre as more of a homophobic hate crime than a
radical Islamic terrorist attack. It allows the left to view the attack as proof that hatred of the LGBT community is
separate from the Muslim faith. [...] It was a coordinated attempt by the media to spin the narrative, to protect Islam at
all costs, despite evidence to the contrary. Unfortunately for them, the FBI has finally come out and said the entire
narrative that Mateen was a self-hating gay man has no evidence to back it up.
Everything
was accurate. But none of it was true. [Scroll down] The points of this narrative: One, the
national media is not interested in accuracy or truth, but in getting the story out first. Two, it should fit a template,
e.g., the nation is racist, law enforcement is prejudiced, and they will frame their narrative accordingly (black male was shot,
it was because the "white" Hispanic is racist, there is racism all over the country). Three, the people doing the reporting
have little knowledge of the facts they are discussing, such as what is the difference between an AR-15 and M-16, or "automatic
fire" and "semi-automatic fire", and "define what is an assault weapon" ([indeed], so ignorant they should run for Congress).
6
Things To Know About Tying Gun Sales To A Watch List. [#2] The Democrats are still falsely conflating the
no-fly list with the terrorist watch list. We've been over this before. The no-fly list is not the same thing as
the terrorist watch list. The no-fly has roughly 40,000 names on it and many of them are not the names of U.S.
citizens. By contrast, the terrorist watch list has more than a million names on it (we can't know the actual number).
The legislation Democrats are pushing relies on a definition similar, but not identical, to the one used to create the terrorist
watch list on a rolling basis. It has nothing to do with the no-fly list. That won't stop Democrats from conflating
the two intentionally (as an aide to Sen. Diane Feinstein admitted she does), nor will it stop ignorant journalists from
confusing them accidentally (as several have conceded to me they have).
Journalism,
R. I. P. For a variety of historical and cultural reasons, most of those who work in the media are
progressives. They believe that government must undertake to fix an array of social maladies, such as income
inequality, perceived racial and gender disparities, and the general dangerous superstitions, bad habits, and cultural
baggage of those of less education than reporters, investigative journalists, and Internet and television commentators.
Yet sometimes simply reporting on society's perceived ills does not offer quite a rich enough landscape in which to save
humanity. And sometimes reality offers examples that confound the progressive ideology. Therefore, journalists
often fabricate stories and justify their cons as necessary means to achieve their higher aims.
Guardian
admits rogue reporter fabricated interviews. The Guardian has admitted that a rogue reporter fabricated
interviews in articles for the newspaper and falsely claimed to have been present at events he wrote about. Joseph
Mayton, a freelance who has been writing for the Guardian since 2009, has been accused of making up quotes in some of his
stories, even filing interviews with people who later said they had never spoken to him.
The
Continually Dishonest Media. Apparently the U.S. media has chosen this week to once again reassert itself as
the epitome of broadcast propaganda; Pravda must have been giving them a run for the ruses. One of the examples today
comes from the nascent Jake Tapper of CNN who rallied the proverbial troops around a claim that Donald Trump "brought up
Vince Foster" while campaigning for President.
Media Lies About Court's
Contraception Order. Anyone still naïve enough to rely on the legacy media for unvarnished news will have
gone to bed Monday evening [5/16/2016] believing that the Supreme Court evaded its duty regarding Little Sisters of the
Poor v. Burwell. Countless headlines had declared that the Court decided to "punt," "skirt," or otherwise
dodge any meaningful action concerning the challenge to the HHS contraception mandate. In reality, SCOTUS handed the
Little Sisters and the other petitioners with whom the Court consolidated their case a major victory in their protracted
battle to defend religious liberties against the depredations of the Obama administration's bureaucrats and lawyers. In
a unanimous opinion, the justices vacated all lower court rulings against the Little Sisters and the other petitioners.
The term "vacated," in this context, means that the Court has rendered those adverse decisions legally void. And the
justices didn't stop there.
Irony
Alert: New MSNBC Ad Says 'We Seek Different Perspectives'. With no sense of irony or humor, a new MSNBC
ad claims the network "seeks different perspectives." Yes, the cable channel home to some of most liberal hosts and
journalists on the planet, touted, "We seek different perspectives, connect the dots, approach the story from all the
angles." The condescending commercial started airing on Tuesday [5/3/2016]. The unidentified voice lectured, "We
break news. Yeah. But we do more than that. If all you want is headlines, check your Twitter feed." The
announcer smugly continued, "We go beyond the sound bites." What's so bizarre about this latest spot is that it directly
contradicts previous MSNBC ads.
Top
10 Misreported or Underreported Stories of 2015. [#1] The Fake Iran Agreement: In July the mainstream media
celebrated a deal between Iran and the P5+1 that would provide Iran with sanctions relief along with virtually no accountability.
Today, the administration, along with their lapdogs in the press, continues to argue that this somehow adds up to a good deal
for the world. It doesn't. In fact, there really is no deal at all. The New York Times and other news organizations
still call this a "signed" deal. It isn't.
How
The Mainstream Media Spread Another False 'Islamophobia' Story. The journalists and publications which implied
the hit and run in Molenbeek this weekend was a 'far right' anti Islam attack had no evidence to suggest that it was as they
reported, but they knew what story they wanted to write. That's why most hesitantly wrote "during" a "far right
demonstration" instead of bluntly labelling the driver a "far right activist" as did the Daily Mail, the first
publication to report on the story. Instead of acknowledging the categorical error, or clearly reporting the truth as
it emerged, however, the Mail quietly edited their original article, burying the factual change three quarters of the
way down the page, and failing to issue a correction or clarification.
Dumping
Tabloid Trash on Ted Cruz. The National Enquirer's name in journalism is synonymous with factually unsupported
drivel of the lowest kind. It is a sacred truth that no responsible journalist would reference the kind of garbage found in
this tabloid. But somehow it's perfectly appropriate for the same responsible journalists to report the sleaze over and
over, emphasizing, of course, that the source is the awful National Enquirer.
CNN Started The Carson Drop-Out Rumor; Now They're Lying
About It To Bash Cruz. [Scroll down] Cruz's team explicitly cited CNN's reporting in its emails. Carson himself has sent emails blaming CNN. Cruz correctly
pointed out what happened on CNN, as you can see from the transcript [in this article]. And while CNN reporters tweeted that Carson wasn't dropping out, as did Carson staffers, CNN
did not report on air that Carson was staying in the race until later in the evening.
The myth of the cop killing
'epidemic'. To hear the media tell it, America is in the grip of an unprecedented crime wave, an orgy of wanton
murder in which heavily armed thugs randomly gun down innocent unarmed people, some of them teens, just for sport.
Except that these homicidal goons are wearing the blues and badges of American police departments. It's the narrative
that's given rise to the protest movement Black Lives Matter and to a growing public mistrust of the police in general.
From Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo., to the recent shooting of a middle-aged woman and a teen in Chicago, the body count seemingly
keeps rising, exacerbating racial tensions and keeping the nation on edge. And each incident is breathlessly reported by a
media determined to show that America remains deeply, irredeemably racist. Problem is, it's simply not true.
Did
Media Misquote NC Anti-Solar Residents To Make Them Look Stupid? Numerous left-wing media outlets have repeatedly misquoted citizens
of Woodland, N.C., after the city government voted to reject a proposed solar farm. An article in the Huffington Post claimed local resident
Bobby Mann said the proposed solar farm would "stop plants from growing and suck up all the energy from the sun," during his testimony to the
Woodland Town Council, citing an article in the Roanoke-Chowan Herald-News. However, the Herald-News only directly quotes Bobby Mann as saying
"You're killing your town, [a]ll the young people are going to move out." Other media outlets repeated the misquote.
Biggest
Liar of 2015: The Washington Post and Its Pinocchios. [Scroll down] The [Washington] Post, of
course, was an early and gleeful adopter of the narrative of the unarmed black person shot for no reason whatsoever by racist
police in Ferguson who apparently did that kind of thing all the time. This Lie infected more than just miles and miles
of newsprint in the hard news sections. It was also reported and spread in the sports, lifestyle, opinion, entertainment, and
virtually every other nook and cranny of the Post — even after the attorney general grudgingly admitted the entire
thing was a hoax in March of this year. The lies are legion. A few of the more deceitful: The Post led the
way in glorifying the hundreds of black Capitol Hill staffers who gathered for a photo op in their $1000 coats, soft leather gloves
stretched into the air, proclaiming 'hands up, don't shoot.' [...]
Thank
You, Joe Scarborough, For Being So Biased And Fact Challenged. Those tuning into Monday's [11/9/2015] "Morning
Joe" on MSNBC might've wondered about the "worst record" poll that host Joe Scarborough said unfairly kicked Chris Christie
off the Fox debate stage. We wondered, too.
Carson
Blows Up at Reporters During Presser: Why Don't You Care About Obama's Past? Ben Carson faced some combative
reporters during a press conference in Florida tonight about the various issues in his background that have been raised this
week. He dismissed Politico's report about him not being formally offered a West Point scholarship, simply
insisting it was relayed to him that he could get one with the kind of accomplishments in his background.
The Three (Clinton) Stooges and
CNBC. [Scroll down] Quintanella has a BA in political science. So does Quick. John Harwood says evasively
that he studied economics and history as an undergraduate. At least half their colleagues have degrees in journalism. Almost
none have had experience managing anyone else's money. So it came as no surprise when Becky Quick asked Ted Cruz what he was going
to do about the fact that women earn 77% of what men make. This claim has been made for four decades; it's almost as old as
Becky. It has 999 lives. No matter how many times it's refuted by economists, the mantra is repeated — like
the similarly discredited claim that intelligence tests are culturally biased.
GOP Media Takedown: A Recipe for
Victory. Along with lawyers and politicians, the media is a group for which Americans have a fairly intense dislike. This
is largely because as with the first two groups, a big part of the modern media's business is lying, and no one likes being lied to.
[...] Along with entertainment and academia, they constitute a tripartite axis of cultural evil. They are Americans' conduit of
information, and how can citizens choose the right policies and politicians if they're being fed misinformation?
Biased
coverage of Israeli-Palestinian 'violence': When terror becomes 'tensions'. If you are seeking an example of bias in the media's
coverage of what journalists are calling the latest round of Israeli-Palestinian "violence," consider the case of Ahmad Manasra. In an
angry speech on Wednesday night [10/14/2015], Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, appealed for calm but accused Israeli security
forces of killing Palestinian boys "in cold blood," singling out the 13-year-old Manasra as one of the Palestinian youths Israel had "executed."
[...] There are at least two major problems with Abbas' charge: First, Ahmad Manasra was not "executed" or even shot by Israelis.
The Ahmed Mohamed Fairy Tale. There can
be no doubt that Americans are fortunate enough to be governed by a brilliantly conceived Constitution drafted by remarkable, intelligent
men. Unfortunately, too many Americans are utterly ignorant of what it contains and how it impacts on their lives. Voter ignorance
on this and so much else contributes to the ease with which the media manipulates public opinion into believing things which are not so.
Lessons
in disaster for the next Katrina. [#1] Though the press patted itself on the back afterwards, in fact, as
American University Journalism Professor W. Joseph Campbell writes, "it's instructive to recall how extreme and over the top
the reporting was from New Orleans in Katrina's aftermath." Reports of wandering bands of rapists, a 10-year-old girl raped
in the New Orleans Convention Center, claims that people were shooting at rescue helicopters, sharks haunting the floodwaters,
bodies stacked like cordwood — all were false. Though the extremism generated ratings, and satisfied the
anti-American urges of the foreign press, it did real harm. New Orleans, a city battered by disaster, was portrayed as,
in Maureen Dowd's words, "a snake pit of anarchy, death, looting, raping, marauding thugs, suffering innocents, a shattered
infrastructure, a gutted police force, insufficient troop levels and criminally negligent government planning." Dowd
used this portrayal to take shots at then-President George W. Bush, and I suspect a lot of the media pile-on was similarly
motivated, but it had the effect of stigmatizing victims and, by playing up anarchy and danger, may even have delayed the arrival
of aid, as rescuers feared to go in without armed escort. Overall, a horrible media performance.
An activist masquerading as a journalist is an impostor. Activist
anchor Jorge Ramos uses influence to push immigration agenda. Univision anchor Jorge Ramos, who has long been
as much an activist as a newsman, managed to find himself at the center of an immigration story yet again this week as he
went head-to-head with GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump, getting tossed from a press conference after repeatedly and
insistently trying to ask questions.
Obama,
Bush, Clinton: Secret Agents. [Scroll down] [Jorge Ramos] asserts proudly that he votes in elections in
both countries. (Translation of Ramos' world view: He'd like to see the U.S. flooded with the dregs of his native country so
he and Democrat elites could rule it without a vibrant middle class as they do Mexico.) Ramos is employed by Univision,
whose owner Haim Saban is a big Clinton contributor, Mrs. Saban is a big Hillary supporter. Jorge's daughter works for
Hillary Clinton. He is most certainly a Clinton operative in newsman's drag.
Jorge
Ramos Is an Immigration Activist Posing as a Reporter. Jorge Ramos may be the award-winning celebrity anchor of
Univision's premier news broadcast, but "the Walter Cronkite of Hispanic News" long ago revealed himself to be less a
journalist than another perpetually indignant immigration activist. His devolution into outright heckler was only a matter of
time. It would be difficult to overstate Ramos's immigration radicalism. When Central American children were pouring over the
border last summer, Ramos announced as a solution, "First, we treat children like children, as if they were our own." When,
in their 2012 interview, Newt Gingrich told Ramos, "I'm not going to let you define what 'immigration reform' is," Ramos replied,
"It's very simple: to legalize 11 million undocumented immigrants." And when, last November, President Obama
lawlessly granted amnesty to some 5 million of those immigrants, Ramos touted the measure as "a triumph for the Latino community."
Jorge
Ramos Has a Long History of Activist 'Reporting'. Ramos has been called the "Walter Cronkite of Latino
America," but he has a history of behaving more like an activist with a cable-news platform than a reporter. Ramos
constantly identifies with his Latino and immigrant audience, using words like "us" and "our" when reporting on any
immigration-related issue. He seems to see himself as the gatekeeper of Latino American opinion —
and to think that qualifies him to be a political kingmaker.
For
a 'Silenced' Journalist, Jorge Ramos Sure Is Getting a Lot of Air Time. A couple of days ago, I had no idea who
Jorge Ramos was. I imagine many others were likewise unfamiliar with the Univision newscaster before Donald Trump made him
famous by kicking him out of a press conference. Among several media appearances since the confrontation with Trump on
Tuesday, Ramos was on The Kelly File Wednesday night. [...] First of all, can we bask ever so briefly in the irony of being
"silenced" on national television, then getting to rant about it ad nauseam on all the major networks? This guy has been
anything but silenced. He should send Trump a thank you note for the exposure.
The
Media Lies, AGAIN, About Donald Trump's Illegal Alien Enforcement Proposals — Completely Manufactured Claims.
Having watched an entire media cycle of punditry pontificate about Donald Trump proposing to deport "by force" 11 to 42 million
illegal aliens we find ourselves shaking our heads at how little the MSM think of the viewing audience. NOWHERE in Donald Trump's
proposal does he say, or advocate for, the mass "rounding up and subsequent deportation" of millions of illegal aliens. He never
said it, he never proposed it, and it doesn't exist in his presented Border Solution and Illegal Alien proposal. It just doesn't
exist, yet the media claim it to be so.
PolitiFact
and Planned Parenthood: Erroneous Fact Checks All the Way Down. Planned Parenthood now finds itself being
heavily criticized after being caught on tape brokering fetal body parts. Fortunately for them, they have no
shortage of allies in the media, including PolitiFact. Fox Business reporter Sandra Smith recently said on air
"Almost 95 percent of all (Planned Parenthood) pregnancy services were abortions." On Tuesday, PunditFact,
a division of PolitiFact, rated it false. PolitiFact concedes the source of this statistic is Planned Parenthood's
own annual report. If you take the number of services listed in the report, exclude the ones that don't apply
to women who aren't pregnant, you do indeed get a figure that showing that over 94 percent of pregnant women who
go to Planned Parenthood get an abortion.
Cahoots: Email
Reveals Hillary Clinton Was Fed Questions Before Meet the Press Appearance. One of the
private Hillary Clinton emails released Friday [7/31/2015] reveals that an NBC source was leaking possible
questions to the then-Secretary of State's staff ahead of an appearance on Meet the Press. In
an July 2009 email with the subject line "heads up," Clinton staffer Lissa Muscatine wrote, "You probably
already know this, but I just heard from a friend who is wired at Meet the Press that David Gregory will
ask you about David Maziar, the Newsweek journalist arrested in Iran."
Muhammad...
Muhammad... Where Have I Heard That Name Before? In the wake of the latest mass
shooting, carried out by Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez, an engineer like so many Islamic terrorists,
we are seeing the usual scramble to avoid stating the obvious. On CNN, Tom Fuentes ludicrously
cautioned that Muhammad is not an Islamic name: [...]
New
York Times Debunked: Scott Walker's 'I'm Not Going Nativist' Conversation Never Happened. A
conversation about immigration between Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and the Heritage Foundation's Stephen Moore,
reported on by the New York Times this week, never happened. "We have spoken with Stephen Moore
and the conversation that was reported did not happen and he will tell you that. I would recommend you
reach out to him," Walker spokeswoman AshLee Strong told Breitbart News on Thursday [7/2/2015] in response to
an article by Jonathan Martin and Maggie Haberman.
Fanning
the Flames of Another Black-Church-Arson Hoax. On Monday [6/29/2015], a Baltimore
Sun lead editorial decried "a series of mysterious fires at African-American churches across the
South" in the wake of the Charleston murders. The newspaper cited a "pattern" of attacks,
including what it claimed was an "uptick in attacks on 37 black churches in the South" in the 1990s
that "prompted President Bill Clinton to set up a church-arson investigative task force." The
Sun neglected to mention that Clinton had falsely claimed at the time that he had "vivid and
painful memories of black churches being burned in my own state when I was a child" — an
assertion immediately debunked by the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette.
Gallup
Poll: Confidence in Police Rates Twice That of Mainstream Media. "None of this should
surprise anyone," [John] Nolte stated, because "certain members of the police force have been caught
doing some truly terrible things, no question. But these are individual incidents in individual
precincts. "On the other hand, time and again and again as an institution," he indicated, "the
mainstream media has been caught red-handed lying, fabricating evidence and engaging in the kind of
corruption that would put any other institution (the National Football League, police, the Koch
brothers) out of business."
An
NBC Affiliate Manufactures a Story to Attack Conservatives. "Months before the conference, my family
booked a hotel room at the same resort as ALEC," reported Brendan Keefe of WXIA TV, also known as 11 Alive.
It's the NBC affiliate in Atlanta. "We found the fabled back room where the laws are made," he told their
audience. It was sweeps week and NBC had a scoop. What he failed to mention is that the event held by the
right-leaning American Legislative Exchange Council was open to the press, he did not register for the event,
he registered at the hotel under an assumed name, and the hotel was not a resort, just a hotel in Savannah.
More particularly, it was the Hyatt in Savannah.
Our Biggest Problem Is A Lying,
Stinking Media. [Scroll down] But the truth is that the lies of the press are
nothing new. It can be traced back to the 1930's with Stalin apologist Walter Durant's lies about
the Soviet Union that won him a Pulitzer Prize. Yes, he was a New York Times correspondent,
of course. It has taken over seventy years for the Pulitzer Prize committee to review Durant's
denial about the desperate condition of the Russian people under Stalin and to consider revoking that
prize but why bother since that prize has been a joke for many years? The Pulitzer Prize was
awarded to the Times-Picayune newspaper for totally fraudulent reporting of the Katrina disaster.
Researcher
Behind Fabricated Gay Marriage Study LIED About Funding. Michael LaCour, the University of
California-Los Angeles graduate student responsible for a now-widely discredited study on attitudes towards
gay marriage, apparently lied about the funding grants given for his fraudulent research. In fact,
according to The New Yorker, LaCour received no funding at all for the study — which was published
last December in Science magazine and discredited earlier this week — into whether views on
same-sex marriage change due to interaction with gay individuals.
What's
Behind Big Science Frauds? In December, Science published a paper claiming that people
could change their minds about same-sex marriage after talking for just 20 minutes with a gay
person. It seemed too good to be true — and it was. On Wednesday [5/20/2015],
the journal distanced itself from the study, after its accuracy was disputed, and one of the authors
could not back up the findings. News organizations, which had reported on the study,
scrambled to correct the record.
Never
Trust Liberal "Fact Checkers". The Democratic Party controls almost all of the news
media. Some years ago, the Democrats came up with a great idea: they established "fact
checkers" within Democratic Party newspapers to spin unfortunate facts in the Democrats' favor.
Today, several such "fact checkers" are well known. Are they reliable? Of course not.
Math Is Hard For Obamacarians.
If you are masochistic enough to read the "reporting" of the legacy media on Obamacare, you will
have noticed a spate of recent stories with titles like the following from CNBC: "Health spending
post-Obamacare seen $2.5 trillion lower." This headline is not only awkwardly worded.
It is, like the article over which it appears, misleading. It misrepresents a new study from the
left-leaning Urban Institute concerning projected health care spending in a way that suggests the nation
has saved enormous amounts of money thanks to the "Affordable Care Act." This is absurd, of course,
but it highlights an underappreciated element of the health care reform debate — the adversarial
relationship that exists between Obamacare's partisans in the press and basic statistics.
Another
Great Moment in Mainstream Journalism. This story, like the now-completely discredited
Rolling Stone "campus rape" article, shows the dangers of an increasingly biased mainstream news
media. Stories that fits reporters' and editors' ideological predispositions get rushed through into
print with little skepticism or careful review, and apparently with no actual fact checking.
Libel
Is Obama's Latest Weapon In His War On Israel. Behold what's buried in Tuesday's [3/24/2015] Wall
Street Journal — a claim of Israeli spying, which was obviously planted by one or more nameless
administration officials seeking to make the Israelis' newly re-elected leader look like a U.S. enemy:
"While U.S. intelligence officials believe secured U.S. communications are relatively safe from the Israelis,
they say European communications are vulnerable." The Israelis, it turns out, almost certainly got their
information from eavesdropping not on U.S., but on European and Iranian diplomatic communications —
which virtually every U.S. embassy in the world does.
NYTs Caught Manipulating Story That Didn't Fit Their
Narrative. In a story published Monday [3/16/2015], The New York Times reported online
that family members of Jeffrey Williams, the 20 year-old man suspected of shooting and wounding two
Ferguson police officers, confirmed that Williams had been one of the Ferguson protesters. This
morning, at the same url, that crucial piece of news disappeared from the story. No update or
editor's note explained the removal (that has now been returned).
The
Biggest Lie of Our Generation: Ferguson Was All About Traffic Tickets. Hands up,
don't shoot? Lie. Gentle giant? Lie. Minding his own business? Lie. Shot
in the back? Lie. Did not attack the police officer? Lie. 'Didn't do nothing' to
the Asian shopkeeper? Lie. Relatives did not try to start a riot? Lie. Protests
were "largely peaceful?" Lie. National Guard would protect the business owners from
looting... This is a very long list of of the bodyguard of lies that reporters and activists
(sorry for the redundancy) hoped would protect anyone from challenging the core truth of the racial
grievance industry, which is the biggest lie of this generation: Black people are relentless victims
of relentless white racism. All the time. Everywhere. That explains everything.
And it is not just Ferguson. Lying about race and racial violence is now the default position
for American reporters.
Petraeus
Set To Plead Guilty — Remove Himself From The Clutches Of Obama/Clinton Blackmail. CNN
is reporting, through Evan Perez again, that General David Petraeus is expected to plead guilty to a federal probe
that he gave classified pillow-talk intelligence to Paula Broadwell during their affair in 2011/2012.
It should be noted, however, that Evan Perez was recently the CNN reporter who presented an entirely false
story about a DHS report on Soverign Citizens where he portrayed the report as DHS worried about right-wing
extremist groups. Nothing in his interpretation of the report was even remotely accurate [...]
JW
Exposes Another NBC Scandal Days Before Brian Williams Debacle. The mainstream media's
credibility continues to deteriorate at a breakneck rate and now a major network television
station — with recent transgressions exposed by Judicial Watch and a U.S. military
newspaper — is serving as the poster child of this shameful movement. It involves two
popular and "respected" journalists at NBC, disgraced "Nightly News" anchor Brian Williams and "Meet
the Press" anchor David Gregory, two of the highest paid and most coveted personalities in the
network's history.
AP:
Islam Fundamentally a Religion of Peace, 'Brazen' Critics Probably Racist. AP writer
Lee Keath published an article on Monday dealing with the "debate among Muslims over interpreting
faith" — without mentioning that thousands of deaths are meted out every year in the name
of Islam across the globe. Keath instead describes those who question the link between Islam and
jihadist violence as "increasingly brazen." Rather than focusing on the "brazenness" of the murderers
in Islam's name, the author instead points towards those who dare critique the Religion of Peace.
Obama's
Endless Lies and His Media Accomplices. It was appropriate that the Democratic Senate
report on "torture" was released on the same day that Jonathan Gruber was testifying about lying to
the American people regarding the benefits of Obamacare. The Senate report was another form of
deception, designed to confuse and mislead about what Obama has used in place of interrogation techniques
of terrorists. Obama doesn't interrogate terrorists, he kills them. Yet, we are led to believe
Obama believes in American values and practices them. The American people would see through the
lies if only they could depend on a media that would lead them out of all the deliberate obfuscation.
Why
The Media's Fact Problems Are Way Bigger Than Rolling Stone. It's absolutely true that
we don't have a wave of outright fabrication-out-of-whole-cloth. But what we have is much worse. We
have a tsunami of inaccuracy that is generally tolerated, embraced and even celebrated so long as it serves the
right political and cultural goals.
NBC's Snyderman
faces credibility issues. NBC must now decide whether Snyderman's credibility is too
damaged for her to continue reporting on Ebola or other medical issues and, if so, for how long.
Ex-Obama
Aide Destroys Media Narrative, Admits Gruber Was an 'Important Figure'. A former
adviser to Barack Obama on Tuesday [11/18/2014] overturned the media narrative, promoted by the
President, that Jonathan Gruber was an unimportant, minor figure. The New York Times on
Tuesday insisted in an editorial, "Republicans are crowing over Mr. Gruber's remarks because he has
been portrayed as a major architect of the health reform law. In truth, his role was limited."
The health care operative has repeatedly bragged about fooling "stupid" Americans. The paper's
editors lectured, "His comments should not be taken as evidence that the reform law was hatched in
secrecy and foisted on the public by trickery." Yet, Steven Rattner, a former Obama administration
adviser, countered this narrative on Morning Joe.
ABC
and NBC Ignore Gruber's Numerous W.H. Visits, CBS Barely Covers. On Tuesday, the Wall Street
Journal reported that Jonathan Gruber, one of the architects of ObamaCare, made more than a dozen visits to
visit the White House since "Democrats began drafting the law in 2009." Despite the latest developments
in the Gruber controversy, which contradicts President Obama's line that Gruber was "some advisor who never
worked on our staff," CBS This Morning was the only network morning show to mention the report, giving
it a mere 24 seconds during its Tuesday morning [11/18/2014] broadcast. ABC's Good Morning
America and NBC's Today ignored the Journal's report altogether.
Chuck
Todd: Eric Holder is a 'Very Non-Political Person'. [Meet the Press host Chuck] Todd says
this of the man who openly talked about serving "my people" as attorney general. He made that comment in
connection with the New Black Panther case — a racially-tinged case that Holder's DOJ dropped even
after the government had won it. Eric Holder desperately wants to treat al Qaeda terrorists as
criminals rather than non-state illegal combatants. That's a political choice, and one for which he has
been roundly criticized. When Holder attempted to move trials of al Qaeda terrorists from military
tribunals to civilian court — in New York — he lost. Big. Being obtuse to
the viewpoints of others, and being unable to comprehend that the things that you say and do offend and anger
others, is not the same thing as being "non-political."
Best
of facts-free reporting hands-down... I mean up. I began to lose interest in Ferguson,
Mo., when it was first reported that the late Michael Brown was an "aspiring rapper." Hadn't heard
that one yet? It was in the LA Times, under the headline: "Michael Brown's raps: Money, sex,
drugs — and a vulnerable side." Of course he had to have a vulnerable side. That's why
he was known as "the Gentle Giant." He didn't look terribly gentle in that closed-circuit video,
shoving the owner of the Ferguson Market when he was stealing the box of Swisher Sweets just before
he got shot. But the demonstrators could see right through that — "the man" had
photoshopped the video, or so they said live on national TV.
The
Media Are Buying Hillary's Foreign Policy [Prevarication] — And Selling It To
You. Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton — the most senior foreign
policy official in the United States, aside from President Barack Obama himself, for four
years — is now attempting to differentiate herself from her old boss, now that his
hapless leadership has become a liability to her presidential ambitions. And the media are buying
it, then re-selling it to the public as if it represents an authentic split instead of opportunism and lies.
5
Reasons Not to Trust the 'What Me Worry' Media About Ebola. [#5] The mainstream media
lies. It lies all the time. The mainstream media is a degenerate, habitual, serial liar that exists
only to serve the government and the noxious little career-climbing bubble it exists in. I always
assume the media is lying — that way I'm right more than I'm wrong. The mainstream media
is a wretched institution populated with wretched people and only a handful of exceptions. If
you're foolish enough to believe the mainstream media will put what's morally good, right, and true
above The Club Rules, you obviously haven't watched CNN's coverage of the war in Gaza.
The
Self-Inflicted Hamas 'Massacre' Blamed By the Media on Israel. According to the Hamas version of events — widely
promulgated in the media by ITN, the Telegraph and the Belfast Telegraph — an Israeli airstrike on a crowded market place during
a partial ceasefire in the Shijaiyah neighbourhood of Gaza City on July 30th, 2014 was responsible for the deaths of 17 people,
including blue-helmeted photojournalist Rani Rayan. However as Thomas Wictor has incontrovertibly demonstrated using close
analysis of film footage of the incident, the deaths were not caused by Israeli shrapnel but by secondary explosions from a vast
cache of Hamas rockets. Oh, and the market wasn't 'crowded' either: it had been closed for the day. And this
particular area wasn't included in the ceasefire zone, either, because Hamas was continuing to fire rockets from it.
Gallup:
Public Confidence in TV News at All-Time Low. Public confidence in television news is
at an all-time low, according to a survey released today [6/19/2014] by Gallup. [...] In the latest
survey, conducted June 5-8, only 10 percent said they had "a great deal" of confidence in T.V.
news, and 8 percent said they had "quite a lot" of confidence.
Gallup:
Public Confidence in TV News at All-Time Low. Public confidence in television news is
at an all-time low, according to a survey released today by Gallup. Only 18 percent of the
Americans surveyed expressed either a "great deal" or "quite a lot" of confidence in that news medium.
Dana
Milbank's Heritage disaster. Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank set off a flurry
of outraged tweets on Monday night [6/16/2014] after posting a highly critical recap of a panel event at
The Heritage Foundation that, he says, "deteriorated into the ugly taunting of a woman in the room who
wore an Islamic head covering." Video of that panel has since surfaced and — in my
view — Milbank grossly misrepresented the nature of that exchange.
Friends
Don't Let Friends Read Dana Milbank. Dana Milbank is a columnist for the Washington
Post who serially exaggerates or distorts what he writes about. It's just what he does. This has
been established so many times by so many people that it's disappointing to see he is still given prominent
perch in his paper and that people who made it past their sophomore year in high school take him seriously.
What Dana Milbank
Does Not Tell You. [Scroll down] But what's more, Milbank relies on the account of "Saba Ahmed,
an American University law student," who is the aggrieved victim of his piece. She's a moderate,
caring Muslim girl targeted by the group because she is Muslim. What Milbank does not tell you is
that Saba Ahmed is a family friend of Mohammed Osman Mohamud, the convicted Islamic bomber who
tried to blow up Portland, OR in the name of jihad. Milbank also does not tell you Saba Ahmed has
been arrested for stalking and her family claims she was diagnosed with a mental disorder. She's
also been active at Occupy rallies denouncing American war efforts. She has made opposition to the
American war against terrorism a key part of what she does. And she took to Heritage to hijack a
conversation on Benghazi, turning it to her issue, which had not even been a topic of conversation.
Washington
Post Lets Columnist Dana Milbank Lie About Heritage Foundation. Writing for a
Washington Post that apparently decided his column was too good to check, columnist Dana Milbank
attacked the conservative Heritage Foundation for bullying a female Muslim woman who expressed
concern about Muslim stereotyping during a panel Monday night. The only problem with Milbank's
charge is that it's a smear — it never happened. And of all places, it is video
from the left-wing Media Matters that debunks Milbank's entire column.
MSNBC.com
Deceptively Edits Dave Brat to Suggest He Was 'Dodging' Questions. Editors at
MSNBC.com trimmed down Republican congressional nominee Dave Brat's June 11 phone interview with
MSNBC's Chuck Todd in order to paint him as dodging questions from the Daily Rundown host. But
a review of the full interview shows that Brat had already and seemingly quite gladly answered a
few policy questions on such hot issues as the minimum wage, immigration reform, and his stance on
Wall Street's influence on the business wing of the GOP.
Six
Lies The Leftist Media Tells About The Contraception Mandate Cases. This week, the Supreme Court will consider
whether businesses and their owners must choose between paying millions of dollars in fines and violating their religious
beliefs. [...] The leftist papers do not mention the substantial monetary burden put on religious business owners to
violate their consciences. The papers do not mention that contraception was both inexpensive and widely available
before the contraception mandate, and still is. The papers omit to mention that it isn't the businesses who have
radically changed, but the mandates from government. Quite simply, if you read a newspaper to find out about the
contraception mandate cases, you will read lies.
Jacksonville Channel 4 falsely portrays black on white hate crime attacks
as having a white perpetrator. For years we have talked about how the media censors black crime.
Many major media outlets now openly admit to having a policy of censoring black crime perpetrators. However, an
even more sinister form of censorship is rising. This is what we call Stage 2 censorship of black crime.
Where the media purposely leads you to believe that a black crime perpetrator was actually a white guy.
Appalling:
NY Times editorial distorts, misleads, and lies to readers on HHS Mandate. With many political debates, I try to
give opponents the benefit of the doubt on intentions. Sure, raising taxes is a bad thing, but some politicians and pundits
believe higher taxes will benefit society. Some people think we need to spend more, and others really fear climate change.
When it comes to the HHS abortifacient/contraception/sterilization mandate, however, I've almost stopped being that generous
with the left's media and thought leaders. [A recent] New York Times Magazine editorial is a prime example as to why.
Almost from start to finish, the piece misleads and misdirects readers about the mandate, its opponents, and religious freedom.
Yet Another Journalist Says Lying Is A-OK.
It's a relatively new development for journalists to admit that lying to the public isn't a bad thing, but it's a rapidly growing
phenomenon, as sophistry becomes an increasingly accepted practice in the MSM, to the point where it's openly talked about by
those who employ it.
Cybersecurity
Expert Accuses NBC of '100% Fraudulent' Hacking Story, NBC Fires Back. Earlier this week, NBC's Richard Engel filed a report warning
travelers to Sochi about the danger of getting hacked, but one cybersecurity expert took serious issue with the story, which he described on his
blog as "100% fraudulent." In the report, Engel brought some brand-new laptops and a new phone just to test how secure people's devices would
be in Sochi, and he concluded that he was hacked "almost immediately." But Robert Graham pointed out a few reasons why all is not as it seems.
NBC
News Fails to Disclose Soros Connection In Shriver Report on Women. The Media Research Center reports that a report promoted
heavily by NBC News Special Anchor Maria Shriver was funded by a ultra-left political group funded by George Soros. Earlier this week
Shriver was all over NBC News and MSNBC to talk about a study titled "The Shriver Report: A Woman's Nation Pushes Back From the Brink."
The promotion of the report also allowed Shriver and NBC News to portray President Obama as "sympathetic to working mothers." This
push focusing on women we see throughout the media, not just on NBC, is nothing more than the media prepping the battlefield to elect
Hillary Clinton.
Five
Years of Falsehoods at NBC News. Everyone acted surprised when we learned yesterday that after a couple of disastrous
months, MSNBC is defiantly refusing to change their editorial process. But why would they? For years now, MSNBC and NBC
News have both become a culture of left-wing hate and fraudulent editing. The only thing new, as you will see [in this article],
is that the frequency of the fraud and hate is increasing. What I've assembled here isn't anything close to comprehensive, but
it is a revealing top ten: [...]
Ripping Off the "Progressive" Mask. It is a sad fact that
telling a lie these days has become more convenient than telling the truth. This is a terrible commentary on those with access to our
major media. Consider the coverage of the inauguration of Bill de Blasio as New York City's mayor. The term "progressive" is
used in most accounts to describe him and his backers. De Blasio accepts that term. Yet, by any objective measure, he is a
dedicated Marxist, and has been for most of his life. For example, he never disavowed his support for the communist Sandinistas in
Nicaragua. He claims to have honeymooned in communist Cuba, when such a trip was illegal. His wife was a member of a Marxist collective.
NBC
News' Happy Obamacare Customer is a Dem Candidate, Operative. NBC News senior health reporter JoNel Aleccia told the story of a
woman described as "Joyce Moore, a Pennsylvania financial planner" who "runs her own retirement and estate planning business." NBC said
Moore was actually happy her existing insurance was canceled due to Obamacare. [...] What NBC News Senior Health Reporter JoNel Aleccia failed
to mention is that Joyce Moore is a longstanding Democratic activist who, in November 2013, ran as a Democratic candidate for Upper Milford
Township Supervisor in Pennsylvania.
10 Forms of 2013 Media Malpractice. [#1] Pretend
that "no one" is saying something, when they really are. Carol Costello of CNN claimed in January that "no one
is talking about overturning the Second Amendment or confiscating guns in America." In the three preceding weeks, New York
Governor Andrew Cuomo had said that "confiscation could be an option"; an Iowa state representative had "said governments should
start confiscating semi-automatic rifles and other firearms"; and Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein of California had suggested a
gun-buyback program which "could be compulsory." In early December, New York City's police department sent out "letters
telling gun owners to turn over their rifles and shotguns — or else face the consequences," i.e., confiscation.
Journalistic
malpractice over Benghazi. The Times' report misconstrues known facts and simply sweeps under the table mountains
of evidence of al Qaeda's ties to Libyan jihadi groups. In June 2012, for example, more than a dozen different jihadi
groups put the black flag of al Qaeda on parade in Benghazi in what they hoped would be a three-day show of force.
Thousands of jihadi fighters, many of them in Pakistani and Afghan dress, paraded through the streets of Benghazi with
hundreds of gun trucks. For The New York Times, though, the black flags were merely "the black flags of militant Islam"
and apparently bore no relation to al Qaeda. "Benghazi was not infiltrated by al Qaeda," The Times flatly asserted.
House
Intel Chairman on NYT's Benghazi Report: 'That Story Is Just Not Accurate'. The New York Times on Sunday
[12/29/2013] published a highly controversial report claiming the September 2012 attack on our consulate in Benghazi, Libya,
did not involve al Qaeda, and was as the Administration originally stated a spontaneous demonstration in response to an American-made
anti-Islamic video. Appearing on Fox News Sunday, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) completely
refuted the article saying, "[T]hat story is just not accurate".
Denver Post Stealth Edits Out
'Socialist' from Profile of Arapahoe School Shooter. In a profile on the shooter in the Denver Post which focused on his "strong political beliefs,"
several of Pierson's classmates offered their impressions of the shooter. One of the shooter's classmates described him as a "very opinionated socialist."
Shortly after that post was published, however, that description was edited out. The current copy simply describes him as "very opinionated."
Mika Suggests Obama 'Too Smart' For The
Job. Too smart to be President. Is that really Barack Obama's problem? Mika Brzezinski thinks so. On today's [11/4/2013] Morning
Joe, as Mike Barnicle and John Heilemann kicked around the notion, as others have before, that President Obama doesn't much like politics and the people
in it, Brzezinski piped up with a different explanation for his aloofness: he's "too smart for the job," she suggested.
The Editor says...
I can provide copious evidence that Barack H. Obama is not all that bright.
WashPost's
Milbank: 'Couldn't Be the Case' That Some Lost Insurance Because of ObamaCare. On Monday's PoliticsNation, Washington Post
columnist Dana Milbank claimed that it "couldn't be the case at this time" that ObamaCare is already causing people to lose their current health insurance
plans, in spite of all the documented cases insurance companies canceling plans as they struggle to comply with ObamaCare regulations.
The Shutdown that Ruined Christmas?
[Scroll down] On the very first night, Oct. 1, NBC already sounded like a DNC campaign commercial. Reporter John Yang highlighted an EPA worker in
Chicago, Elizabeth Lytle, who had already filed for unemployment benefits. [...] Despite her $52,000-a-year salary, Lytle is an experienced "victim." Back in
March, the eco-news site Greenwire also focused on her suffering from sequestration. [...] Here, too, was ethical fraud: NBC and other outlets didn't say so,
but Lytle had been previously featured in the media by her union, the American Federation of Government Employees.
The AP Misreports the Debt Ceiling.
I wrote here that no matter what happens with the debt limit, the federal government will not default on its debt obligations. I also noted here
that Moody's — which certainly ought to know — agrees that there is zero chance of default on Treasury bonds. In recent days,
many more commentators have made the same point. The government is legally obligated to recognize its debt obligations, and the existing
$17 trillion debt can be serviced on less than ten percent of federal revenue. So there simply can't be a default.
The Planned Destruction of America. One world is where the television and radio pundits sanctimoniously scold
us into believing that all is normal, and everything we see taking place today is merely the result of a growing acrimonious relationship between two political parties. They sit behind
the microphones, in front of the TV cameras, write the newsprint, and dominate the internet with their matrix of mendacity. They are well-paid for keeping the public in the dark, and by
confining public discourse to the limitations of mere political theater. Regardless of their political bent, they bully and mock those who disagree, and sneer at those who dare threaten
the illusion of normalcy. The other world is what is really taking place behind the scenes.
Limbaugh Bashes 'Journalistic
Malpractice' Attacking GOP Over Gov't Shutdown. Rush Limbaugh took the media to task Monday [9/30/2013] for foisting all the blame of a potential
government shutdown on Republicans. Limbaugh predicted in the next few days the media would write piece after piece about all the programs getting shut
down during the shutdown and blaming Republican intransigence on the whole thing. He referred to the AP article above as "basically a press release from
the Democrat party" that accuses Republicans of hating Obama so much they're willing to let millions of people go without health care.
Little Media Lies About
ObamaCare. [Scroll down] Obama signed House bills to kill a costly ObamaCare reporting rule, terminate its long-term care insurance
program and repeal the "free choice voucher" program. He also signed bills cutting funds for the so-called CO-OP program, a public health slush fund
and other ObamaCare programs. Two other House-passed bills — one to end the Independent Payment Advisory Board and another terminating
the medical device tax — have strong bipartisan support. Another simply codified the employer mandate delay Obama himself had already
ordered. Yet the media pretend these things never happened.
BBC claims
Tamerlan Tsarnaev motivated by "right-wing" literature, not radical Islam. With all the efforts to tie the Tea Party and "right wing"
to violence committed by others, it wouldn't be long before the Islamic radical Boston bomber Tamerlan Tsarnaev was tied to "right-wing" causes.
With the slenderest of proof, The BBC goes there.
How the Media Has
Distorted a Tragedy. [Scroll down] This narrative has perpetuated the lie that Zimmerman's history of calls to the police
indicates obsessive racial paranoia. Thus, discussing the verdict on the PBS NewsHour, University of Connecticut professor and New Yorker
contributor Jelani Cobb asserted that "Zimmerman had called the police 46 times in previous six years, only for African-Americans, only
for African-American men." Actually, only six calls — two of them about Trayvon Martin — had to do with African-American men.
Defending
American Principles Is Now a Revolutionary Act. The [George Zimmerman] case was a joke, but you wouldn't know that if you only listened
to the mainstream media. The media's rank speculation, mischaracterization of the evidence and outright lies were designed to replace the strict
adherence to law and the rules of evidence that for a thousand years have protected the accused from the mindless fury of the mob.
Key
Witness for Zimmerman Grand Jury Changes Story. We wrote yesterday [10/31/2014] about
the "October Surprise/Get Out the Vote" announcement by a flailing Obama administration that the
Department of Justice will be holding a Grand Jury hearing next Wednesday regarding possible federal
civil rights charges against George Zimmerman. The only named witness for Wednesday's hearing is
Frank Taaffe, a self-declared "friend" for George Zimmerman. Earlier this year Taaffe suddenly
announced that he believed Zimmerman had a racial, not merely self-defense, motive in killing Trayvon
Martin. This would be more than two years after the shooting occurred.
More lies from the main
stream media about the Zimmerman case. The claim that Zimmerman was at fault because he pursued Martin after being told not to has
absolutely no basis in fact. It is a made up assumption that has been repeated so many times by the media that people actually believe that is
what happened. The 911 call that was placed by Zimmerman is on the web in both audio and written transcript form. It was played numerous
times at the trial. There is no excuse for continuing to lie about the evidence. The Chicago Tribune should know better than to continue
to perpetuate lies that have fueled so much anger over this case.
Just report the news, don't generate it. TX
Lt. Gov: Reporters Tried To Inflame Pro-Abortion Protesters. Texas Lt. Governor David Dewhurst told HotAir's Ed Morrissey
that his office received reports that reporters were actively encouraging and rallying pro-abortion protesters during State Sen. Wendy
Davis' fillibuster last week.
Media misreporting rampant in Trayvon
Martin case. A combination of pressure through social media and poor journalism led to the trial of George Zimmerman, who is accused of
second-degree murder in last year's shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin. Immediately after the shooting in Sanford, Fla., which is
20 miles northeast of Orlando, the media described Mr. Zimmerman as white, setting up the racially divisive meme of a white man killing a black
teenager — a characterization that proved to be wrong.
Number Seven: NBC
News Again Caught Selectively Editing Video. Deceptive journalistic practices at NBC News show no sign of slowing down. This
latest attempt to selectively edit audio/video in order to benefit Barack Obama represents the seventh such act of willful, intentional journalistic
malpractice. NBC News is already being sued over one instance involving George Zimmerman.
WaPo Quietly Changes Key
Details in NSA Story. The gist is that the Washington Post has quietly made major edits to its initial
story about the NSA's PRISM program, without acknowledging that any changes have been made at all. Many of the
changes are stylistic, but many are factual.
CNN
Launches Dishonest Attack On Clarence Thomas — To Protect Voter Fraud. CNN published an article by John Blake entitled
"Three questions for Clarence Thomas" that allows them to not only distort the black conservative judge's opinions, but also to tip-toe on the
edge of racism, referring to Justice Thomas as a "sellout" and "Uncle Thomas" while hiding behind the cowardly journalistic trick of "Hey,
we're just reporting what other people say!"
Propaganda:
NPR Incorrectly Claims IRS Has Nothing to do With Obamacare. During the May 22 broadcast of National Public Radio's
"Talk of the Nation," host Neil Conan repeatedly contradicted a guest by claiming that the IRS has nothing at all to do with Obamacare.
NPR's Conan is, of course, completely incorrect. The IRS is up to its Tea Party harassing neck in Obamacare. The guest Conan
contradicted was Kellyanne Conway, a Republican strategist and pollster. Conway was on to discuss the various scandals in which
Obama is mired and close to the end of her segment she questioned how the American people can trust the IRS to implement Obamacare.
Conan initially pressed her on the claim saying that she must have "misspoken."
NBC News Again Caught
Selectively Editing Video. I had hoped this nonsense would end with the reign of Steve Capus, but once again we have
NBC News forced to apologize for yet-another dishonest edit meant to push the left's agenda.
News Media Keep Peddling
Their Bush Vs. Gore Lie. When Sandra Day O'Connor said she regretted her decision in Bush v. Gore, the press threw
another fit about the "stolen" election. They seem to forget their own studies proved the court's ruling didn't matter.
Newspaper
caught photoshopping injuries out of Boston Marathon photograph. A US newspaper has admitted that it digitally altered a
front-page photograph of a Boston Marathon bombing victim so that the woman's pants covered her horrific leg wounds. The woman's gory
wounds had vanished on the large image that wrapped around the New York Daily News on Tuesday [4/16/2013], despite the photograph
appearing unedited online and in other publications in the US.
The Top 50 Liberal Media Bias Examples. [#12] Fake Exploding GM
Trucks: In 1993 on its Dateline NBC program, NBC News was determined to smear trucks made by General Motors. The TV newsers wanted to show America
that the gas tanks in GM trucks were prone to exploding. Dateline aired footage of just that causing a PR nightmare for GM. Ultimately, NBC had viewers
convinced that GM's "sidesaddle" gas tank was a hazard. But in its zeal to destroy GM, NBC forgot to mention one little thing to the viewing public.
Its video of an exploding gas tank was little else but Hollywood special effects.
False Media
Narrative: Hagel Filibuster 'Unprecedented'. You'll hear it all over cable news and the networks and in every lede
paragraph from the Washington Post to the LA Times: Republicans are conducting an unprecedented filibuster of Chuck Hagel.
Where did the media get this buzz word that's repeated breathlessly by the obedient servants of the White House? From the White
House, of course.
Steve Capus Oversaw 'Erosion of
Journalistic Values'. You would think five documented instances of outright journalistic fraud from a single news division would result
in a little more outrage from our journalistic overlords. You would also think that those who believe in the ethics of their profession would
speak out, or that those with competitive instincts would leap at the opportunity to ding a competitor. But media has its own version of a
the Blue Code of Silence.
Cutter: Yeah, we've been
lying about the $5 trillion we said Romney's lying about. As soon as Team Obama realized its excuse-making was getting embarrassing after
the president's debate performance, they pivoted to a replay of the response to Rep. Paul Ryan's convention speech in Tampa. They can't call either
of them dumb, so they have to call them liars. In the service of that narrative, they either present mere philosophical disagreements as "lies" or
they dishonestly represent parts of Mitt Romney's plan to make him into a "liar."
Are the Media Telling
the Truth About Romney's "Lies"? [Scroll down] Many reports have documented examples of stimulus money wasted on dubious projects or
that benefited well-connected firms. And [Paul] Ryan's overall complaint was that the money was "borrowed, spent, and wasted."
That may be hyperbole, but by Obama's own standards, the stimulus was hardly a success. Just before he signed the stimulus, Obama
promised it would "ignite spending by businesses and consumers," unleash "a new wave of innovation, activity and construction," and
produce 4% economic growth this year. None of which happened.
Were journalists using fake names to
make Obama donations at the convention? [Scroll down] So the next time you hear a "journalist" pitching in with the sort of in-kind campaign
contribution that Democrats love, even though they are very upset by the idea of other types of corporation participating in political speech, remember
that he or she might be driving home in a car with a "Democrats Are Hot" bumper sticker, purchased under a fake name at the Democratic National Convention.
MSNBC's Chris Matthews
claims to live in 'black majority' DC, but actually lives in Md. suburbs. MSNBC host Chris Matthews might have
exaggerated his abilities to hear dog-whistle racism at this week's Republican National Convention in Tampa, Newsbusters' Jack
Coleman noted. During Tuesday night's [8/28/2012] coverage, Matthews made the case that he is well-positioned to judge
racial issues because of where he lives, after having repeatedly insinuated that Republican figures are racist.
Isaac Shows
Media Bias Of Hurricane Proportions. As Isaac bore down on New Orleans, the administration's media toadies
preferred to talk not about substantive issues, but on how the "shadow of Bush and Katrina" hung over the delayed GOP
convention in Tampa.
WaPo's Glenn
Kessler Has Fact-Checking Tantrum Over 'You Didn't Build That'. Glenn Kessler is The Washington Post's laughably
biased fact checker, and when you think of Kessler, remember this — remember the "fact" checker who called Romney a liar
for saying a president who didn't go to Israel didn't go to Israel. This guy is utterly shameless, and this morning he's
having a full-blown tantrum.
Mark Brown Declares Obama
is not a Chicago Politician. In a curious column the Sun-Time [sic] Mark Brown denies that President Obama has much to
do with Chicago Politics. Curious because the preponderance of evidence that Brown offers is that President Obama is a typical
Chicago politician, working in league with donors and other politicians to fleece their consituents and taxpayers. [...] If being
Emil Jones point man in Springfield, married to the daughter of a Precinct Committeman/water department employee, and having David
Axelrod as a constant flack for many years doesn't qualify you as a Chicago politician, just what does?
Cutter: I'm Just Going to Make [Stuff] Up
about Jobs. Stephanie Cutter, deputy campaign manager for Obama's reelection effort, seems more a character out of fiction than a
real person. A high-octane spokesman, she is willing to say anything to win the 30-second sound byte cycle. She will lie, contradict
herself and make up stats on the fly to get through any single cable news appearance. Its something real people, with a credibility gene,
wouldn't do. Fortunately, she's a Democrat, so the media will never really hold her statements to account.
NBC
accused of deliberately editing footage of the women's team gymnastics. Controversy over the coverage of the Olympics on
American television deepened today when NBC was accused of deliberately editing footage of the women's team gymnastics in order to create
what critics called "fake suspense." Russian world champion Ksenia Afanasyeva's unexpected fall during the floor exercises, which
effectively handed a gold medal to Team USA during an early stage of the contest, was inexplicably removed from the time-delayed version
of events that NBC presented to its prime-time television viewers.
Faking and enhancing the sounds of the
Olympics. Ah, there's nothing quite like the serene "swoosh-swooshing" of oars in the water, as Olympic rowers glide along the
water. There really isn't, because those sounds spectators are hearing on their TVs are not live from the event, The Atlantic
reported. In order to keep sight of the boats, broadcasters must follow them with chase boats and a helicopter. The result is that
the sound of the rowing is drowned out by that noise. So, NBC elected to replace the live audio with a recorded soundtrack of rowing
practices to deliver more accurate depiction of what the sport sounds like in its pure form.
Media Invents Story That
Chick-fil-A President Condemned Gay Marriage. Last week, reports emerged that Chick-fil-A president Dan Cathy had condemned gay
marriage. It's no secret that the company is run by devout Christians, but this still caused an uproar. Boston's mayor threatened to
deny the company business permits, celebrities condemned the company, and the Muppets announced fast food chain wouldn't be able to license any
new toys for their kids meals. One small problem: The president of Chick-fil-A never actually said anything condemning gay
marriage.
TV Station Fires
Anchor After He Fails to Disclose Connection to Atheist Group He Was Covering. Jason Volentine, a former anchor for WXMI, a television station
in Michigan, found himself without employment after failing to tell his employers about a relationship he had with the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF).
FFRF, an atheist activist group, is a non-profit that advocates for the separation of church and state, while fighting faith in the public square.
It wasn't Volentine's relationship, in itself, that was problematic — it was the fact that he had covered the non-profit group, but had purportedly
failed to tell his employers and viewers about the relationship beforehand.
Nuts to Nutting: Under Obama, Real Spending Has Exploded.
On Tuesday, Rex Nutting of MarketWatch, who per his Linkedin profile is the site's Washington bureau chief, published a column titled "Obama
spending binge never happened." This column will show that it did, but that clever accounting has largely concealed its existence.
The Decline of The Washington Post.
[Scroll down] The [Washington] Post is running paid ads from the Russian and Chinese governments that are made to look like
news sections of the paper. The ads, some of them six pages long, even carry a facsimile of The Washington Post
masthead. In relatively small print it says they are paid supplements and have nothing to do with the paper's news or
editorial departments. But The Washington Post masthead or logo is more prominently featured. [...] Readers are
thus given the impression that the propaganda has the approval of the Post.
Boston Globe Takes Credit for
Breitbart Scoop. Today the Boston Globe has a front-page, below-the-fold story titled "Filings raise more questions on
Warren's ethnic claims." It's a well-written take on documents and information first brought to light here at Breitbart News two weeks
ago. Unfortunately, it's presented as a scoop with no link or reference to the fact that the information has appeared previously in
another publication.
Fox News Has a Van Jones
Problem. In the same way that Van Jones was exposed originally by New Zealand blogger Trevor
Loudon by using Internet search engines to look into his controversial background and writings, over the
course of just a few days Accuracy in Media has been able to determine the following about [Marc Lamont]
Hill from public sources.
It's Not Just Scott
Beauchamp. Scott Beauchamp was the last straw. I realized that I need a scorecard to keep
track of all the fallen journalists, journalistic mistakes and major and minor screw-ups in the
media. Offenses include lying and fabricating, doctoring photos, plagiarism, conflicts of interest,
falling for hoaxes, and overt bias. Some are hilarious, such as an action figure doll being mistaken
for a real soldier. Some are silly, such as reporting on a baseball game watched on TV. Some
are more serious.
It's Not Just Scott
Beauchamp — Part Two. Without too much extra effort, it was fairly easy to
add 21 more names to the "Media Hall of Shame" list, bringing the total to 83. With more
effort, I'm sure the total list could easily double.
In part three, the list grows to 101. Media Dishonesty Matters.
Did you know that Time magazine and other news organizations had a Vietnamese communist on full-time staff
in Vietnam during that war? Do you remember that ABC, CBS and NBC have all rigged cars or trucks
with explosives or other devices to make them look dangerous on TV, or that Consumer Reports lied about
the Suzuki Samurai enough to put it out of business?
Is 'Journalistic
Ethics' an Oxymoron? The Founding Fathers thought a free and skeptical press was
essential to the preservation of our political and economic liberties. The First Amendment
is first for just that reason. What would they think of today's generation of reporters
who hide from the truth, parrot the slogans of left-wing advocacy groups, fail to do their own
research, and routinely give politicians a free ride? My guess is they would be stunned.
Is news just the facts? Not
anymore. When I entered the field the ideal was to "... tell it like it is." Not
what I would like it to be, but simply lay out the facts. If one fact strongly supports a point of
view we were obligated to seek other facts that would dispute it. Unfortunately,
many of today's instructors teach what is called, "advocacy journalism."
Playing with the
numbers: A UPI story a few months back reported that nearly 300,000 veterans
are homeless on any given night. If so, as blogger Megan McArdle pointed out a few weeks
ago on Asymmetrical Information, that would mean that every single homeless person in America
must have served in the armed forces, since 300,000 is about the total number of the homeless.
Opinion masquerading as journalism: The
Liberal media are living in cocoons. Whenever you read the headline, "some say," you know
you are reading the opinions of the reporter. Some say the moon is made of green cheese, but what's the
difference? The story is only worth telling when "some say" what the reporter wants them to say.
Paper
Uses Global Warming Activist's Press Release as News Story. The Palm Beach Post was caught in a
bit of deception by one of its readers over the weekend. ... Unfortunately for the reputation of Dara Kam and
that of the paper, this "article" was merely a rewording of the press release of an environmentalist group
calling themselves, Environment Florida. An alert reader who wrote in calling them on it also exposed
several other papers across the country that did the very same thing.
A
Phony Tale Of Woe. The story currently making the rounds about the guy who robbed a bank for
$1 to get free jailhouse health care is supposed to expose how terrible our medical system is. It
actually exposes something worse. It's a story tailor made for the news media. ... The fact that not
one reporter trafficking this story bothered to point these facts out is an example of gross dereliction
of duty or extreme bias — or both.
WaPo
Author who Tied Romney to KKK Resigns over Plagiarism Scandal. When Washington Post journalist
Elizabeth Flock wrote a post last year falsely accusing Mitt Romney of using a Ku Klux Klan slogan in his campaign
speech, she was not fired or disciplined. But when Flock stole from the work of another mainstream organization
and did not properly attribute, she abruptly "resigned" from the Washington Post conveniently and coincidentally
before another editor's note went up on her post that described it as having "serious factual errors" and "a significant
ethical lapse."
The Associated Press
Algerian
boxer Imane Khelif clinches medal at Olympics after outcry fueled by gender misconceptions.
No excerpt or synopsis will be shown here, since the article starts out with an obvious lie in the
headline. If the boxer in question looks and talks and acts and punches like a man, he's probably
a man; and if earlier tests revealed XY chromosomes, common sense will tell you he is a man.
There is no "misconception."
We
Now Have Answers About Testing Done on Olympic Boxers Imane Khelif and Lin Yu-Ting.
Algerian boxer Imane Khelif gave an interview Sunday night [8/4/2024] urging folks to not bully
Olympic athletes online, but her [sic] compassion was completely misplaced — it focused solely on
her [sic], not the women she [sic] and fellow alleged XY-chromosome holder Lin Yu-Ting have
physically bullied over the past week, women whose lifelong dreams were shattered. [...] Thanks to
a Monday press conference held by the IBA we know at least a few tests Khelif has undergone, and
that while the organization couldn't come right out and say it due to privacy laws, that those
tests show she [sic] has XY chromosomes. That should clear up some misconceptions.
The Editor says...
A person with XY chromosomes is a man. A man pretending to be a woman is a transvestite, not a woman.
The
AP Doggedly Looks for the Medical Records... of the Guy Not Running the Country.
[Scroll down] As the media complex in this country continues to unravel before our eyes,
the developments of Saturday's assassination attempt on Donald Trump continue to bedevil the
press. Of note has been the rise in the journalism ranks of those voices who — in
defiance of years of them bleating about misinformation — are now entertaining the idea
the attempt on Trump's life is either conspiratorial or, at the very least, being falsely
dramatized by his campaign. One of the latest theories percolating with some in the press is
that Trump was not actually hit directly by a shooter, but he endured the effects of the glass
shattering from the teleprompters. Firstly, how is this in any way diminishing the point that
there was an attempt on his life?! If he was not actually struck by a sniper's bullet, then he was
struck by glass from the teleprompter being shattered — by a sniper's bullet! But
the second item is more revealing. There are those in the journalism environment forwarding
this conspiracy without actually — get this — committing journalism. If
you even wanted to entertain this crackpot premise, would you not at least explore it as a
possibility before blathering away?! All one needs to do is look at the footage from July 13,
and what do you suppose it shows? The teleprompters were intact after the episode.
Associated
Press refuses to correct anti-gun story — another symptom of its decline.
Founded in 1846, the Associated Press describes itself as "the most trusted source of fast,
accurate, unbiased news in all formats and the essential provider of the technology and services
vital to the news business." [...] When the Associated Press makes an error, the damage is
compounded because its wire stories have such a wide reach. They're pushed out to AP members
on multiple platforms — print, radio, television and digital — so corrections
are a big deal, or at least they used to be. Nowadays, however, whenever one of its
correspondents writes about guns or the Second Amendment, the AP is just as inaccurate and just as
biased as any other member of the legacy media — another symptom of its overall decline.
Green
college degrees and phony climate calamities. Last week an Associated Press headline
declared, "Graduating seniors seek degrees in climate change and more US universities deliver."
Keep in mind the AP, which feeds stories to news publications around the world, was given an
$8 million grant in 2022 to promote the theory of human-caused climate change in its daily
coverage. The media giant's funding came from the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, the
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Quadrivium, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Walton Family
Foundation. In announcing the gift, the AP said it would be hiring twenty environmental
reporters to "enhance the global understanding of climate change and its impact across the world."
The AP's climate desk isn't staffed by journalists. These are activists
bent on shaping opinions that are short on science and long on instilling fear.
AP
Tries to Explain Why Noncitizen Voting is No Big Deal. With more than ten million
"new arrivals" in the country under Joe Biden's watch, increasing numbers of people have been
expressing concerns over how many of them might wind up trying to vote in the upcoming
elections. Even worse, how many of them might get away with it? This is a threat that
has been brought up by Donald Trump recently, to the great alarm of his detractors in the legacy
media. But he was hardly the first to raise this specter. Rushing to the rescue this
weekend is the Associated Press. They want to assure everyone that Donald Trump is just
engaging in conspiracy theories again. Noncitizen voting simply doesn't happen, or at least
not enough that it should bother you. Our voting system is safe and secure. You know...
just like our border.
AP
Style Guide Aims to Silence Dissent From Climate Alarmist Narrative. Most news
outlets rely on The Associated Press style guide — officially known as the AP
Stylebook — as the arbiter for grammar, spelling, and terminology in news
coverage. While AP puts forth its style guide as an impartial rubric for fair coverage, its
rules often exclude conservative views from the outset. Take AP's latest round of updates,
released Friday. The updates include guidance on how to avoid "stigmatizing" obese people,
admonitions to avoid calling people "homeless" as it might be "dehumanizing," and warnings to avoid
the term "female" since "some people object to its use as a descriptor for women because it can be
seen as emphasizing biology and reproductive capacity over gender identity." AP's style guide
prefers "anti-abortion" and "abortion-rights" as adjectives, urging journalists to avoid "pro-life,"
"pro-choice," and "pro-abortion." Yet one of the largest sections of the updated style guide
involves "climate change," a term that AP says "can be used interchangeably" with the term
"climate crisis."
Associated
Press Admits It Has No 'Geolocation Data' to Back Up Bernie Moreno Smear. A
spokeswoman for the Associated Press (AP) admitted to Breitbart News on Saturday that the
organization does not, despite previously reporting in two different pieces that it did, have any
"geolocation data" to back up its smear piece about Ohio Senate candidate Bernie Moreno.
Lauren Easton, the director of communications for the AP, on Saturday told Breitbart News that
while the organization stands by the story and its reporter Brian Slodysko, it does not have
"geolocation data" as the two articles it previously published originally claimed.
US
in deep freeze while much of the world is extra toasty? Yet again, it's climate
change. [Scroll down] Wind chills in parts of North Dakota reached minus
70 degrees (minus 56 degrees Celsius), while the heat index in Miami was more than
160 degrees warmer at 92 (33 degrees Celsius). The fourth-coldest NFL football game
took place in Kansas City, while across the globe the thermometer hit a blistering 92 degrees,
12 degrees (6.8 degrees Celsius) warmer than average on Friday during tennis' Australian
Open in Melbourne.
The Editor says...
The article above is replete with half-truths and false comparisons. The wind chill and the heat
index are relatively recent inventions to estimate what the winter wind and the summer humidity make the
weather feel like. Comparing the wind chill at one place to the heat index in another
(on the same day) is absurd and immaterial. It proves nothing. Also it is nothing but
sensationalism to compare the temperature in Kansas City to the temperature in Melbourne, Australia,
because in January, one city is in the middle of winter and the other is in the middle of summer.
The Associated Press hopes you won't notice.
Strange
Joe Biden Moment in Pennsylvania Coffee Shop Goes Viral. Democrat President Joe
Biden, who is 81 years old, had yet another strange moment on the campaign trail in Emmaus,
Pennsylvania, on Friday, one that went viral with multiple different interpretations of what he
said taking over the internet. The Republican National Committee (RNC) originally posted a
video of Biden sounding like he said to a coffee shop clerk: "My name is Joe Biden, and I work for
the government in the Senate." But the Associated Press's report on the moment says that Biden
said: "My name is Joe Biden, and I work for the governor and the senator." Biden was
appearing alongside Pennyslvania's Democrat Gov. Josh Shapiro and Sen. Bob Casey (D-PA)
at Nowhere Coffee Co.
US
moves to protect wolverines as climate change melts their mountain refuges, threatens
extinction. The North American wolverine will receive long-delayed threatened species
protections under a Biden administration proposal released Wednesday in response to scientists'
warnings that climate change will likely melt away the rare species' snowy mountain refuges and
push them toward extinction. [...] Wolverines join a growing number of animals, plants and
insects — from polar bears in Alaska to crocodiles in southern Florida — that
officials say are at growing risk as increasing temperatures bake the planet, altering snowfall
patterns and raising sea levels.
The Editor says...
The Associated Press is getting more brazen in its reporting of the dire effects of global warming,
even though there has been approximately zero global warming in the last 25 years.
Certainly not enough of a change for a wolverine to sense. In particular, the Associated Press
casually presents idle conjecture as proven fact. The AP doesn't hesitate to report changes
"snowfall patterns and raising sea levels" as if those are well-established facts on which we all agree.
Right
turn on red? With pedestrian deaths rising, US cities are considering bans.
Sophee Langerman was on her way to a bicycle safety rally in Chicago's Lakeview neighborhood in
June when a car turning right rolled through a red light and slammed into her bike, which she was
walking off the curb and into the crosswalk. The car was moving slowly enough that Langerman
escaped serious injury, but the bicycle required extensive repairs. To Langerman, it's
another argument for ending a practice that almost all U.S. cities have embraced for decades: the
legal prerogative for a driver to turn right after stopping at a red light.
The Editor says...
[#1] The car that hit Ms. Langerman "rolled through a red light." The laws in question permit
drivers "to turn right after stopping at a red light." Most people don't actually
stop. That's the problem. [#2] The right-turn-on-red laws are in place because a majority
of the voters wanted them. The Associated Press is apparently lobbying for the repeal of these laws,
based on dishonest reporting of isolated anecdotes. Why would they do that? Because socialists
want driving an automobile to be as inconvenient as possible, regardless of the voters.
Tens
of thousands march to kick off climate summit, demanding end to warming-causing fossil fuels.
Yelling that the future and their lives depend on ending fossil fuels, tens of thousands of protesters
on Sunday kicked off a week where leaders will try once again to curb climate change primarily caused
by coal, oil and natural gas. But protesters say it's not going to be enough. And they aimed
their wrath directly at U.S. President Joe Biden, urging him to stop approving new oil and gas projects,
phase out current ones and declare a climate emergency with larger executive powers.
The Editor says...
Climate change is not "primarily caused by coal, oil and natural gas." That assertion was thrown in
by the Associated Press writer as if it were an undisputed fact. The climate was constantly changing long
before the industrial revolution created a demand for hydrocarbon fuels, among other things. The
output power of the Sun is not constant. The eruption of one volcano can alter the weather for months.
China and India have no qualms about the emission of carbon dioxide, so any attempt to reduce our own CO2
byproducts will only hurt US.
Media
Hoax: No, the Diary of Anne Frank Has Not Been Banned From Florida Schools. Not a
week goes by that the mainstream media and their allies in the Democratic party don't work hand in
hand to misinform the public in an effort to push false narratives about their political
opposition. This week has certainly been no exception to that rule, with the Associated Press
among the numerous media outlets that have distorted a Florida high school's decision to remove
from their library a book that was very loosely based on the Diary of Anne Frank on the grounds
that it minimized the Holocaust and depicted Frank as a young lesbian girl who fantasized about
seeing women's breasts. Katie Couric was among the many so-called "journalists" who shared
the story: [Tweet] Note that the AP made no attempt to provide even the briefest of
contexts in the headline, a dereliction of duty in my opinion since headlines (and the tweets that
include them) are oftentimes all people will read about a story before forming an opinion. At
first glance, it makes it look like the grades 9-12 Florida school in question didn't want their
students learning about the Holocaust and Frank's experiences, so they pulled the book.
Except that's not the situation at all.
The
Media Keep Lying To Protect Ilhan Omar. After the House voted to deny Rep. Ilhan Omar a seat on the
Foreign Affairs Committee — using a precedent Democrats recently created but suddenly find deeply
offensive — AP tweeted: "BREAKING: House Republicans have voted to oust Democratic Rep Ihan [sic] Omar from
the House Foreign Affairs committee. The vote to remove the Somali-born Muslim lawmaker came after her past
comments critical of Israel." Almost two years ago to the day, the Associated Press reported on the House removing
another congresswoman, Marjorie Taylor Greene, from her committee assignments like so: "BREAKING: The U.S. House
votes to remove Marjorie Taylor Greene from committees for spreading violent, racist rhetoric." You'll notice that
when Democrats denied Taylor Greene a committee seat it was "the House," but it is "House Republicans" when Omar is
booted (and this was the case on NPR, PBS, Yahoo!, etc.). House Speaker Kevin McCarthy has the power to
unilaterally eject Reps. Adam Schiff and Eric Swalwell from the intelligence committee, but the entire House was
needed to remove Omar. Obviously both votes were largely along partisan lines, as almost all votes are
these days. It's a newsworthy fact, no doubt. Yet AP editors left the partisan aspect of the story out of
the headline for only one of the incidents, even though Democrats were the ones creating the precedent.
The
Associated Press Says It's 'Dehumanizing' to Use 'the' in Descriptions — Such as 'the French'.
Are you among the group of Americans who use the word "the"? Are you part of the people who
employ it in the act of description? If so, you've been told to stop — by The AP.
The Associated Press Stylebook has long been considered an authority on ways in which to format the printed word.
Many media outlets conform to its standards, and the latest one is quite a stunner.
Liberal
media made slew of dubious claims about climate change, year-end report finds. The Associated Press took
$8 million in donations to fund climate coverage in 2022, with the news cooperative and several other major media
publications engaged in dubious claims about climate change, according to a new, exclusive year-end report. The
"Climate Fact Check 2022" report, presented by the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI), the Heartland Institute, the
Energy & Environmental Legal Institute, the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT), and the International Climate
Science Coalition (ICSC), stated that "climate alarmists" and members of the media engaged in claims about the
relationship between manmade emissions and natural disasters, claims that clashed with "reality and science." In
February, the Associated Press admitted that they would assign more than 24 journalists across the globe to cover
"climate issues" after receiving more than $8 million over three years from various organizations.
Revisionist
Media 'Explainer' Articles Insist Nobody 'Spied' on Trump. There's a second wave of media reaction to John
Durham's latest filing on the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation. The first wave was silence, hoping somehow the
whole story would vanish. Now, the second wave is "Explainers," which attempt to hem and haw defensively through the
whole business. The Associated Press "Explainer" was headlined "How the latest Trump-Russia filing generated buzz."
This article was sent to me on Twitter by a fellow who apparently hates Donald Trump with the energy of a thousand suns, so
that illustrates the type of people who eagerly share these dismissive articles. The AP reporter on this was Eric
Tucker. [...] This is the threat that Durham represents. He is exposing that everything the Clinton campaign did here
was to politicize national security agencies, sharing its smears with the FBI and the CIA to spur spying on Trump advisers,
to inflame media coverage, and then to taint the judicial process through the Mueller team, where 11 of 16 prosecutors were
Democrat donors. Five of them were Clinton donors.
Don't
believe what Canadian media tells you about the Freedom Convoy. Hundreds of thousands of citizens gathered
across Canada last week to support the Freedom Convoy that trucked across the country to Ottawa to non-violently protest what
have become, for some, the most oppressive and fickle health regulations in the world. Our Prime Minister denounced
them all yesterday as swastika-carrying inciters of violence who promote "hate rhetoric" and are "abusive towards their
fellow citizens." [...] The Associated Press in Toronto outright lied, claiming there was "little sympathy in a country where
more than 80% are vaccinated." Most in the crowds were probably vaccinated. "Three shots & I still can't get a
haircut," one man's homemade sign said. This was about freedom. And a people sick of moving goalposts.
"Many people were outraged by some of the crude behavior," the AP lied. But there was no crude behaviour. It was
lying. Our Prime Minister did this too.
Associated
Press = Associated Propaganda. If nothing else, the past two years have demonstrated with blazing clarity how
the ruling elites live by one set of rules and impose an entirely separate set of rules on the unfavored, ostracized,
dispossessed and deplatformed. As a member of the print, broadcast and internet media for the past 30 years, I cannot
emphasize enough how complicit so-called mainstream journalists are in perpetuating such double standards and stoking hatred
of dissidents. The Fourth Estate will spare no one — not even the dead — in its ruthless pursuit
of absolute power over political narratives. Let us consider a widely disseminated hit piece by Associated Press
investigative reporter Michael Biesecker published on Jan. 3.
[The]
Associated Press [is] lying about consensus on COVID vaccines for children. On 15 December the Associated Press
(AP), one of the world's premier wire services, ran a lengthy report titled "How a Kennedy Built an Anti-Vaccine Juggernaut
Amidst Covid-19." The report, written by Michelle Smith, examined the efforts of Robert Kennedy, Jr. to warn against
what he perceives are the risks associated with the current Covid vaccines, and particularly how those risks pertain to
children. [...] Anybody who takes the trouble to do even a little research will quickly find out that no such consensus
exists. This is very easy to show. To wit, less than a week before the Associated Press filed its report an
international conference was held. It was co-sponsored by an organization called Global Covid Summit, which is an
international alliance of physicians and medical scientists "committed to speaking truth about Covid pandemic research and
treatment." This organization has more than fifteen thousand members from around the globe, many of whom are
recognized as top experts in their fields.
Our
Media Apparently Decides Who Won the NJ Gubernatorial Election. Apparently, our corrupt media now calls
elections and decides who wins. The Associated Press called the race for New Jersey Governor. Unsurprisingly,
they called it for totalitarian progressive Phil Murphy. They called it while an investigation is going on and 40,000
votes, giving Murphy the edge, miraculously appeared in Bergen County. This was after 100% of the vote was reported
in. There is no way Red districts went for Murphy in this climate. Yet, that appears to be what we are supposed
to believe. Murphy is 20,000 votes ahead of Republican opponent Jack Ciatarelli. Why is the media calling races
and why are they doing it before the investigation is completed?
'Miss
Occupy Cockpit in trouble now': Southwest 'Let's Go Brandon' pilot narrative takes odd twist in audio
doubletake. Southwest Airlines 'Let's go, Brandon!' claim may not be all it's cracked up to be according to
social media sleuths[.] Associated Press reporter Colleen Long claimed over the weekend that a Southwest Airlines pilot
on her flight signed off with "Let's go, Brandon!" but the audio being passed around with her story seems to have some major
inconsistencies. First off, according to Twitchy, there is real doubt as to whether the pilot said "Let's go, Brandon!"
or "Let's go, Braves!" because the audio is clipped. But the media ran with the much more controversial "Let's go,
Brandon!" pretty much on the word of an AP reporter.
Is
the story about the Southwest pilot saying 'Let's Go, Brandon' all wrong? It was a made-to-go viral story:
a Southwest pilot, after making his little announcement about the flight to passengers, closed by saying, "Let's go,
Brandon." The next day, an AP reporter tweeted out that she tried desperately — and
unsuccessfully — to get to the cockpit to interview the pilot about what he said for her story about "Let's go,
Brandon." The response was instant, with leftists demanding that he get fired and one likening him to an
ISIS-supporter. But what if the whole narrative is wrong? It's beginning to look as though that's the case.
If you listen to the pilot, when he mumbles "Let's go..." at the end, it doesn't really sound like "Brandon." It's more
likely that the pilot said, "Let's go, Braves." [Video clip]
Another
DeSantis 'Scandal' Implodes. Did you year about the latest "evidence" reported by the "news" media that Florida
Gov. Ron DeSantis is both terrible on COVID and corrupt? The Associated Press published a story yesterday that
quickly gained traction among the "Ron Deathsentence" crowd — primarily comprised of bored resistance warriors and
nervous leftists seeking to kill his political career (many journalists fall into both categories, of course). [...] Beyond
the headline, which seems specifically engineered to generate shares, go viral, and create the appearance of an
ethical and COVID-related cloud over DeSantis (we've seen this play before), the "story" falls apart. There's nothing
newsworthy here, aside from the governor of a large state in the midst of a nasty seasonal COVID spike proactively providing
life-saving treatments to eligible residents.
Media
Reports Florida Hospitals are 'Overrun' — Then One Person Actually Went to Hospital at the 'Center of Storm' to
Check. There is a tremendous amount of effort being expended in the mainstream media to hold up Florida as a
complete failure when it comes to the COVID pandemic. On Friday, the Associated Press reported that Florida broke the
'record' with more than 21,000 new cases in the state. One of the key contentions was that hospitals were closed to
being 'overrun,' a common claim in COVID reports that have nearly all turned up hollow. "The Florida Hospital
Association said Friday that statewide COVID-19 hospitalizations are nearing last year's peak, and one of the state's largest
health care systems, AdventHealth's Central Florida Division, this week advised it would no longer be conducting nonemergency
surgeries in order to free up resources for COVID-19 patients," the AP reported. [...] One citizen decided not to take the
Associated Press or any other mainstream media outlet's word for it and decided to check it out for themself.
Dr. Shay, Phd., who goes by AMA Black Patriot on Twitter (@DrShayPhD) went to a hospital at Cape Canaveral, Florida,
which the AP had used as the location for one of its report. "So the Associated Press wrote an article saying that Cape
Canaveral, FL hospital is bursting at the seams with Covid patients," Dr. Shay tweeted. "I had to go see for
myself, so I drove there. The first set of pictures are of the hospital's parking. More to follow."
The decline and fall
of the Associated Press. Once, long ago, in a land far away, the best journalists tried to stand aloof from the
stories they reported. The idea was simple and powerful. If journalists tried to be neutral and kept their
reporting separate from their opinions, analysis, and speculation, then the public would believe them. Those days are
long gone — and the media's credibility is gone with them. Journalists and media organizations are now smack
in the middle of many stories they cover, in part because they want to be. They want to spin them, to set 'the
Narrative'. Imbued with this new mission, many journalists have become partisan protagonists. They have
deliberately blurred the lines between facts, analysis and opinion — and downplayed the traditional role of
presenting the facts neutrally and letting readers decide. That's a dramatic change in journalistic norms and a
disturbing one for both the media and the public.
Israel
exploded AP's offices; Hamas exploded AP's reputation. This weekend's literally explosive revelation that the
Associated Press served as a human shield for Hamas has repercussions. In an editorial today [5/18/2021], the New York
Post called into question years of AP's coverage of the Hamas terror group's attacks on the sovereign state of Israel.
This comes after Israel told AP to evacuate its offices in a Hamas-owned building because it was going to blow the building
up because it housed Hamas's spy operations. AP howled and cried unfair. The rest of us said, huh? Hamas
was AP's landlord? How [...] is that ethical? Imagine AP renting from Al Qaida or ISIS. Maybe it did.
The New York Post asked, "If AP really didn't know it shared space with Hamas, why trust its reporting?" Good question.
How
the AP Slanted Border Coverage to Hide the Crisis. Typically, news organizations rush to cover crises, real or
perceived. The Associated Press has taken a different tack, using its influential style guide to play down the human
drama unfolding at the southern border. While internal Customs and Border Protection documents repeatedly refer to an
immigration "surge" at the border, according to records reviewed by the Washington Free Beacon, the AP recommends journalists
no longer use such descriptions to avoid offense and maintain supposed "neutrality." Other documents, circulated internally
throughout Customs and Border Protection in May, instruct officials on processing "the surge of undocumented individuals as
efficiently as possible." The move by AP, a response to left-wing activists who demanded gentler language from reporters
when covering immigration, fundamentally changed how newsrooms across the country covered the Biden administration's response
to a historical influx of migrants in the president's first 100 days in office.
Ri-i-i-ght. AP
Denies Any Knowledge Gaza Office Building Was Shared with Hamas Terrorists. The Associated Press (AP) denied
any knowledge that Jala Tower, the building housing its offices in Gaza, was also shared by Hamas terrorists, as claimed by
the Israeli military and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu after the office block was bombed on Saturday [5/15/2021].
AP President and CEO Gary Pruitt denied that the news organization knew Hamas was in the building.
The Editor says...
To put this as politely as I can, I find it impossible to believe that the people working in a professional news-gathering organization, in
a volatile part of the world, would have been oblivious to terrorists in their office building. That level of cluelessness is almost
incomprehensible. I'm not the only one who's skeptical.
AP
Pretends It Didn't Know It Was Sharing a Building With Hamas. After an airstrike struck a building with
terrorist tenants that included Hamas and Al Jazeera, controlled by Qatar, a backer of Hamas, the main story in the media was
about... the media. Specifically the AP's presence in the same building. "We are shocked and horrified that the
Israeli military would target and destroy the building housing AP's bureau and other news organizations in Gaza. They
have long known the location of our bureau and knew journalists were there. We received a warning that the building
would be hit," the AP's statement says. And the AP is complaining about what? Israel warned it that the building
was a target. AP chose to share a building with Hamas and pretend not to know about it.
Confirmed:
the AP Is Incredibly Ignorant and Yes, Hamas Was in the Building. We reported yesterday how the AP was furious
that Israel had leveled the building in which they had offices in Gaza because they were sharing it was Hamas. We asked
the basic question: how could they not know they were sharing the building with Hamas? The AP issued a statement saying
they'd been in the building for 15 years — and had no indication that Hamas was in the building.
If
AP really didn't know it shared space with Hamas, why trust its reporting? After an Israeli airstrike Saturday
destroyed a high-rise office tower on the Gaza Strip, the Associated Press, which had offices there for 15 years, complained,
claiming it had no idea the building was also home to Hamas. If it's true that AP was so unaware — and the
evidence suggests it's unlikely — how can anyone trust its reporting in the region? The Israeli military
ordered the 12-story al-Jalaa Tower, which hosts AP and Al Jazeera offices, evacuated an hour before the strike, saying it
was being used by Hamas military intelligence. For a week, tensions between Israel and Hamas, the terrorist group that
controls Gaza, have been at their highest since their 2014 conflict, with Hamas raining thousands of rockets into residential
areas of the Jewish state. Israel later shared some intelligence with the United States. "We showed them the
smoking gun proving Hamas worked out of that building," a source close to Foreign Minister Gabi Ashkenazi told the Jerusalem
Post. "I understand they found the explanation satisfactory."
Associated
Press is slammed for saying it was unaware of Hamas intel operation in their building. The Associated Press has
been accused of lying about whether it knew Hamas maintained a military presence in its Gaza headquarters. Israeli
forces destroyed Jala Tower which had been the AP's headquarters in the Palestinian territory for 15 years, and was also
where Al Jazeera was based. Politicians and journalists in the United States rushed to condemn the bombing, claiming
the Israelis had endangered the lives of the journalists.
Israel
showed US 'smoking gun' on Hamas in AP office tower, officials say. Israel shared intelligence with the US
showing how Hamas operated inside the same building with the Associated Press and Al-Jazeera in Gaza, officials in Jerusalem
said on Sunday. Officials in more than one government office confirmed that US President Joe Biden's phone call to
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Saturday was, in part, about the bombing of the building, and that Israel showed Biden
and American officials the intelligence behind the action. "We showed them the smoking gun proving Hamas worked out of
that building," a senior diplomatic source said. "I understand they found the explanation satisfactory."
The AP goes
Sgt. Schultz. After its customary warning to protect civilian life, the IDF took out the 12-story Jala
Tower housing Hamas military intelligence offices as well as offices for Al Jazeera and the Associated Press. As far as
I can tell from reports such as this photo-filled story in the Daily Mail, no lives were lost in the bombing. The Biden
administration nevertheless found the occasion fit to lecture Israel yesterday "that ensuring the safety and security of
journalists and independent media is a paramount responsibility." According to the Jerusalem Post, Israeli authorities
have showed Biden administration officials the "smoking gun" proving that Hamas worked out of the building.
Neither
the Media Nor the Electoral College Calls Races — the GSA Does & They've Been Silent. In a Nov. 2
piece recounting the longstanding role of The Associated Press in determining winners of presidential elections, New York
Times reporter Katie Robertson wrote "In the United States — which, unlike many other countries, does not have a
national electoral commission — the news media takes the role of race-caller in presidential elections."
According to who? Robertson conveniently left out that it's not the self-anointed media experts who call elections, but
rather the General Services Administration, which issues a letter of determination in a race. So far, the GSA hasn't
done that, regardless of what the media "race-callers" dictate. Interestingly, Robertson's article included commentary
from Sally Buzbee, executive editor for The Associated Press, who actually explained in clear detail why it's premature and
disingenuous for anyone in the media to declare Joe Biden the victor right now.
The TV networks can make all the declarations and pronouncements they like, but they are not official. Fox
News, CNN, MSNBC, AP Call Presidential Election for Joe Biden. Corporate media outlets called the presidential
election for former Vice President Joe Biden and his running mate, Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA). CNN, MSNBC, and the
Associated Press called the election for Biden at 11:28 a.m., just minutes before President Trump's lawyers were expected to
speak at a press conference about challenging votes in Pennsylvania. Fox News ultimately followed suit at 11:40 a.m.
The Editor says...
Television stations and networks operate on the age-old principle of "monkey see, monkey do." If two or more
competitors simultaneously declare that the moon is 53 percent uranium, the others will soon follow suit, attributing the
story to the competition if necessary. But they don't want to be the last ones to report that they know about a "breaking"
story, even if it's questionable.
AP
called out for adopting Democrat language on court-packing. The Associated Press was forced to add an editor's
note to a recent story about the Supreme Court on Saturday, in which the outlet made it seem as if the Democratic strategy to
pack the high court would "depoliticize" the bench. The article, written by Iris Samuels, centered on a debate between
Sen. Steve Daines, R-Mont., and Gov. Steve Bullock, his Democratic opponent in the upcoming election. The
AP's original post reportedly read, "Bullock said that if Coney Barrett was confirmed, he would be open to measures to
depoliticize the court, including adding judges to the bench, a practice critics have dubbed packing the courts." The
report referred to President Trump's Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett.
'Americans
aren't idiots!' The AP's use of 'Democrats' language' to explain 'packing the court' doesn't go well. Since the
Associated Press considers itself "an independent global news organization dedicated to factual reporting," it would be
problematic for an AP article to contain commentary packaged as news and facts. Real Clear Politics co-founder and
president Tom Bevan captured the following excerpt from an AP story. ["]With lightning speed, the Associated Press
adopts Democrats' language on SCOTUS: adding members is now 'depoliticizing' the court, only 'critics' refer to it as
'packing.'["] [...] To call increasing the number of Supreme Court justices "depoliticizing" would be an egregious
political overstatement if made by a Democrat politician, much less a news organization.
Associated
Press stylebook revisions sugarcoat rioting and looting. The stylebook published by the Associated Press was
virtually the bible for journalistic writing until the past several years, an authoritative guide as to which terms to use
and which to avoid in order to present the news fairly, without biasing readers one way or another. But that memory is
fading fast now that the capture of journalism by the left is a fait accompli. Instead of eliminating bias, the AP
Stylebook is being revised along the lines George Orwell laid out in 1984 — as a tool for indoctrination.
AP
Issues New Guidance for Reporters to Cover Up Leftist Violence. Mobs of violent left-wing kooks have been
roaming the streets of American cities for months terrorizing residents, murdering Trump supporters, beating people to a
pulp, shooting police officers, and assaulting people in their vehicles. But you wouldn't know any of this if you
consumed news exclusively from the mainstream media because the mainstream media doesn't want you to know about it. The
Associated Press (AP) issues guidelines, closely adhered to by many journalists, dictating what words are politically correct
at the time and what words to avoid. The AP issued new guidance on Wednesday telling journalists to avoid using the
word "riot" when covering leftwing events and refrain from reporting on property destruction because, according to the AP,
such reporting has been used in the past as a way to stigmatize protests against lynching and racial injustice. To the
AP, it's not the job of journalists to report the news. It's the job of journalists to advance a left-wing narrative.
The
lying about Donald Trump is now completely out of control. Anti-trump liberals (i.e., Democrats and the media)
just have to find something — anything — wrong with the president, even if it means making it up.
The perpetually not-President Hillary Clinton on Monday shared a side-by-side photo of the White House, one lit up in a
rainbow spectrum from 2015, when Barack Obama was in office, and the other appearing almost in pitch black with no
lighting. "Elections matter," tweeted Clinton. [...] Yet it turns out the photo passed off as a metaphor for Trump's
apathy toward police brutality and racism was actually, like the rainbow White House, from the Obama years. So
pervasive was that meme on social media that the Associated Press was moved to fact check and let liberals know that, sorry,
the slam dunk on Trump was actually an embarrassing rebound.
Obama's
De Facto Russian Collusion Co-Conspirators. [Scroll down] In a little over three years, the Washington
Post published nearly 24,000 stories about Trump, Russia and collusion. The New York Times published over
18,000 stories. CNN on its website published 11,500 stories. The wire service Associated Press, which supplies
over 1300 local newspapers and broadcasters with news articles, published nearly 12,500 stories. All told there were
probably more than 100,000 stories published in the media, over 90% of which were anti-Trump with virtually no criticism or
disclosure of the Obama Administration and their machinations. Among CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, PBS and NBC, it is estimated
that over 20,000 broadcast hours were spent on the Russian collusion narrative again virtually all anti-Trump as many of the
Obama collaborators were retained as contributors on these networks. Barack Obama's faith in the cooperation of the
mainstream media was also well placed.
Steve Wynn
Vindicated. [Scroll down] This isn't the first time, of course, that the Associated Press and the New
York Times have peddled "totally fanciful" stories that served their agendas, and it won't be the last. Wynn sued the
AP as well as Kuta, but the judge found in AP's favor because its story relied on a police report.
Media
victim-blames Jews for anti-Semitic attacks. Anti-Semitic attacks are increasing at an alarming rate in the New
York area, and NBC New York seems to think Hasidic and Orthodox Jews have somehow created this problem by... living there.
In a now-deleted tweet, the media outlet shared a story and claimed "the expansion of Orthodox communities outside NYC" has
resulted in "civic sparring," and "some fear the recent violence may be an outgrowth of that conflict." NBC New York
deleted the tweet shortly after, but the story, originally reported and written by the Associated Press, itself isn't
much better. In fact, it might be worse.
AP
Retracts False Claim Trump Contradicted Ambassador's Testimony. The Associated Press retracted a false claim
that President Donald Trump "contradicted" the testimony of Ambassador Gordon Sondland in congressional testimony yesterday
[11/20/2019] when he said he wanted "nothing" from Ukraine. In a now-deleted tweet, the Associated Press' false claim
blatantly ignores what Sondland actually testified that Trump said.
The What
They Actually Said Rule. The Associated Press today engaged in a clickbait that predates the Internet. In
it, the reporter makes a statement in the form of a question, then attributes the statement to the interviewed person.
Media Outlets Hype Trump
Tweet As New Admission — Forget He Said The Same Thing Last Year. Media outlets botched another
Trump-Russia story on Sunday [8/5/2018]. President Donald Trump sent out a tweet Sunday morning defending his son Donald
Trump Jr.'s decision to take a July 2016 meeting with a Russian lawyer who promised damaging information on then-Democratic
nominee Hillary Clinton. [...] The vast majority of reporting on the president's tweet portrayed it as a significant
admission. The Associated Press reported that Trump "appeared to change his story" and sent out a news alert
to that effect.
Do
Fake News and Corruption Change How We Think? The release this week of the redacted Carter Page FISA warrant
has generated metric tons of fake news and confirmed just how corrupt our institutions are. [...] At this point, the press
has all but dropped any pretense of objectivity and is peddling outright (and obvious) lies. John Hinderaker at
PowerLine described the reporting as "a vendetta", but I am not sure he went far enough by simply calling out the
Associated Press. It was not only the that AP ran a fake news story but the Washington Post, CNN, MSNBC, New
York Magazine, the New York Times, and even the Weekly Standard published stories suggesting the warrant
as released contradicts Rep. Devin Nunes's blistering memo from earlier this year.
The
Associated Press Lies About The FISA Application. The Associated Press carries on a daily vendetta against the
Trump administration, systematically misleading the American people in articles that appear in hundreds or thousands of newspapers.
Thus, it is no surprise that the AP's story on DOJ's FISA application dump is nothing but Democratic Party spin.
Not Real
News: A look at what didn't happen this week. A roundup of some of the most popular, but completely
untrue, headlines of the week. None of these stories are legit, even though they were shared widely on social
media. The Associated Press checked these out; here are the real facts: [...]
NBC News Incorrectly
Labels Menendez a Republican Before Correcting Article Hours Later. NBC News published an article Wednesday
incorrectly labeling Sen. Robert Menendez (D., N.J.), currently in federal court on bribery charges, a Republican.
NBC styled Menendez as a Republican in the lede of the article, then confusingly labeled him a Democrat at the end of the
introductory paragraph, the Daily Caller reported. The article appears to be a wire from the Associated Press,
but the original piece on the AP's website does not feature the mistake, suggesting it was added in by NBC.
Democracy
Dies Due To Journalists' Lies. One of CNN's reporters complained that the president had the audacity to take
questions in Poland from a reporter who had applied for a job with the Trump Administration. Please pay no attention to
the actual number of reporters who went to work for Barack Obama and those who did not but chose to carry his water for
him. After the election, the media pushed out the story that Russia had stolen the election for President Trump.
One newspaper claimed Russia had hacked the American power grid. That story had to be retracted. [...] In February, the
Associated Press ran a story that President Trump intended to mobilize the National Guard to round up illegal aliens.
The story was not true, but just about every major media outlet ran with it. In May, the media claimed the GOP had
trucked in beer to congress to celebrate repealing Obamacare. That was not true either.
Associated
Press Corrects Big Falsehood In Four Trump-Russia Reports. The Associated Press "clarified" a false claim it's been running in stories
about President Trump and Russia on Friday, conceding in a release it's not the case that 17 intelligence agencies "agreed" on the hacking narrative.
The correction to four reports on Trump and Russia comes the same day The New York Times issued a similar correction to a Maggie Haberman report.
Both TheNYT and the AP now say the claim they've been floating for months is incorrect.
How
to Read the Newspaper. The Associated Press has bias problems and some notable competency problems, and, like
any organization that does any substantive reporting, it makes errors. But it does not, for the most part, traffic in
fiction. [...] Television has a somewhat worse record. Dan Rather infamously attempted to derail the presidential
campaign of George W. Bush by publishing a report, derived from fake documents, that Bush had been deficient in his military
service, and that his superior officers had been pressured to cover up his shortcomings. This was the event that really
launched modern blogging as we know it, as dozens of critics ranging from politicos to typography experts showed that
Rather's reporting was based on a fabrication, despite CBS News's strident defense of his work. But it was not the
first episode of its kind: Dateline NBC had previously used incendiary devices to rig a Chevrolet truck to
explode in a story purporting to demonstrate its unsafe gas-tank design. There have been others.
The AP Attacks
Voter ID. The Associated Press is generally a mouthpiece for Democratic Party talking points. That is the
case as to voter ID, as this rather pathetic piece shows: "In Wisconsin, ID law proved insurmountable for many voters."
[...] The obvious question is: how many? The reporter now tells us that the number of people who didn't vote
because they lacked proper ID is "unknown." The article identifies exactly four.
Liberal
Media Bend Over Backwards To Avoid Describing March For Life As Pro-Life. Liberal media outlets bent over
backwards to avoid describing the March for Life as pro-life, relying exhaustively on terms like "anti-abortion" or "abortion
opponents" to describe the hundreds of thousands of pro-life marchers in Washington, D.C. on Friday [1/27/2017].
"Anti-Abortion Groups Hold Triumphant Rally After Obama Years" was how the Associated Press titled its coverage of the march,
later referring to the pro-life marchers as a "politically ascendant anti-abortion movement."
Bias alert:
The Associated Press is wrong about one aspect of this story, in the first sentence: The primary
greenhouse gas is water vapor, which no law or politician can counteract.
AP
Calls Crippled Economy 'Healthy' Amid Mass Immigration. In a grim report detailing
America's severe economic decline, the Associated Press brushes off two crucial factors: Mass
immigration and Obamacare's grip on employers. [...] A record 93,626,000 Americans have stopped
looking for work in an economy that managed to create only one job for every two immigrants the
government let in from 2000 to 2014. When all U.S. job growth goes to foreigners at the expense of
Americans, while everyone in the labor force sees their wages suppressed year after year, it makes sense that
some would throw in the towel — and other would tolerate less-than-ideal jobs to make ends meet.
AP
perpetuates tale that Benghazi attack caused by anti-Islam film. In a report about a
Supreme Court ruling, the Associated Press on Monday [5/18/2015] continued with the ruse that an
anti-Muslim film posted on YouTube caused violence in the Middle East, culminating in the murder of
a U.S. ambassador on Sept. 11, 2012. "In a victory for free speech advocates, a federal appeals
court says YouTube should not have been forced to take down an anti-Muslim film that sparked violence in
the Middle East and death threats to actors," the AP wrote.
AP
Gives False and Conflicting Information on Potential Voter Fraud Case. In a move that serves to discount the severity of voter
fraud in the US, the Associated Press' Gary Fineout posted two conflicting reports regarding a voter fraud investigation. Strangely, after
posting inaccurate information in an article, the heavily left-leaning AP staff writer then posted an update — one that conflicted
with the first false posting, yet was still false in itself.
Washington Post Admits to Bogus Quote.
Veteran Washington Post reporter Daryl Fears, part of a two-person writer team, unmistakably wrote
that filmmaker John O'Keefe had "said" he "targeted" ACORN, the advocacy group, for his candid-camera expose,
because it registered voters to defeat Republicans. O'Keefe said no such thing. It was a
non-quote made out of whole cloth by reporter Fears, and published as fact on Sept. 17. Making the
falsehood exponentially worse, the Post story then was retailed worldwide by the Associated Press.
Investigation
of COVID-19 cover-up in New York nursing homes is bad news for CNN. An Associated Press investigation
showing that more than 11,000 people may have died as a result of New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo's order forcing infectious
coronavirus patients into long-term care facilities is obviously bad news for the state's chief executive. It is also
bad news for CNN, which has done more than any other news outlet to reframe Cuomo's disastrous handling of the pandemic as a
success story. "New York's coronavirus death toll in nursing homes, already among the highest in the nation, could
actually be a significant undercount. Unlike every other state with major outbreaks, New York only counts residents who
died on nursing home property and not those who were transported to hospitals and died there," the AP reports.
Associated
Press Engulfed in CNN-Level Scandal as It Covers Up Invention of Imaginary Pruitt Meeting. A Breitbart News investigation has led to the
correction by the Associated Press — which originally resisted — of the fake news it printed as deeper questions of responsibility,
accountability, and journalistic ethics consume the AP heading into Fourth of July weekend. This time, the Associated Press invented an imaginary
meeting between EPA administrator Scott Pruitt and Dow Chemical CEO Andrew Liveris, and then alleged that some kind of impropriety happened as a result.
Police
Conclusion: Rolling Stone UVA Rape Story a Work of Fiction. Four months after the
publication of an infamous Rolling Stone piece depicting a violent gang rape at one of the
University of Virginia's fraternities, and the magazine's subsequent retraction due to numerous
inconsistencies and gross journalistic malpractice, the Charlottesville police department announced
their investigation's findings this afternoon [3/23/2015]. From the Associated Press: ["']All I
can tell you is that there is no substantive basis to conclude that what was reported in that article
happened,['] Charlottesville Police Chief Timothy Longo said.["]
The
Price Of A Porcine Panic. There's panic in the streets over a flu outbreak. "Projections
are that this virus will kill 1 million Americans," the nation's top health official has warned.
The virus is swine flu. But the date is 1976. And the projection, it turns out, is off by
999,999 deaths. Direct ones, that is. The hastily developed vaccine killed or crippled
hundreds.
An example of Associated Press hysteria: Figuring How to Terrify Us Over Swine Flu.
"U.S. health officials say swine flu could strike up to 40 percent of Americans over the next two years and
as many as several hundred thousand could die." So declares an Associated Press article, the writer of
which you can picture trying to catch his breath as he pounds away at the keyboard.
Newsweek
Newsweek
descends deeper into the gutter of vile propaganda. [Scroll down]
Following orders from the PR wing, is the formerly respectable news outlet Newsweek. An
article in the magazine quotes FBI Director Christopher Wray's testimony before the House Judiciary
Committee where he said it is not yet certain if Trump's injury was caused by a bullet or
shrapnel. How did the Newsweek article cover this? Their tweet promoting the
article is captioned 'Donald Trump might not have been shot after all.' Their article headline
states 'Donald Trump May Not Have Been Hit By Bullet, FBI Director Says' They are hoping that
people don't read the article and make up their minds just by reading the text of the tweet or the
headline. They are wishing that people would assume that the shooting was a hoax or even
staged by Trump so that it would benefit him politically. Many left-wing conspiracy theorists
had claimed this moments after the incident. It must be understood that this isn't a
mistake. An article goes through multiple reviews from editors before it is published, even
if the writer erred, someone on the editorial team should have rectified the error. The same
applies to social media. The fact that this disgraceful material was published proves it was
purposeful[.] This is a vile and disgraceful piece of propaganda.
No
Matter How Much You Hate the Media, It Isn't Enough. A sad incident occurred at the
Home Depot in Fontana, California (fifty miles east of Los Angeles) on February 27. After
running in and out of traffic, apparently trying to be hit, Marcus Allen Camacho ran into the store
and grabbed a jab saw. Camacho ignored police orders to drop the weapon, shook off a taser
hit, and when he started running toward police while brandishing the saw, he was shot and killed by
officers. Camacho, who according to his widow suffered from mental health issues, left her
and four children behind. One would think that any reporting on this story aside from
bare-boned facts would take time to pursue the mental health angle. Did Camacho seek help for
his problems? If so, did he receive any? Were there drugs involved? His wife's
statement on a GoFundMe page seeking donations to pay for funeral expenses makes no mention of any.
[...] Responsible reporting — fundamentally sound reporting — would pursue
answers to these questions. Instead, we have one Khaleda Rahman of Newsweek chiming in with a
take so egregiously agenda-driven it barely mentions the facts before diving into the
deep end of woke.
Newsweek
Lies About President Trump Not Being on Primary Ballot in Colorado and Maine. Given
the nature of the propaganda we are likely to see in the 2024 election, perhaps this should not
come as a surprise. However, in an article published today within Newsweek, there is a direct
lie about President Trump and the GOP ballot for Colorado and Maine. [...] Newsweek claims that
President Trump "will not appear on the primary ballot in Maine and Colorado," this is a
lie. Both states (court and secretary of state) "stayed" their political ruling and arbitrary
decisions, which permits Donald Trump to continue appearing on both primary ballots. In the
bigger picture, this type of media claim is a result of accepting the insufferable terms of
'disinformation', 'misinformation' and 'malinformation' to permeate the world of information.
This claim by Newsweek is a lie — period. It is not misinformation or shaped
information; it is just plain false.
Deep
State Throat Sends a Warning. "Donald Trump Followers Targeted by FBI as 2024
Election Nears" headlined the October 4 report in Newsweek. "The federal government
believes that the threat of violence and major civil disturbances around the 2024 U.S. presidential
election is so great that it has quietly created a new category of extremists that it seeks to
track and counter: Donald Trump's army of MAGA followers." Author William M. Arkin,
an "award-winning journalist" and author of best-selling books, thus sets the tone right from the
top. Donald Trump has "followers," language readers might expect for a religious cult leader,
and these followers constitute an "army." The challenge for the FBI, Arkin explains, "is to
pursue and prevent what it calls domestic terrorism without direct reference to political parties
or affiliations — even though the vast majority of its current 'anti-government'
investigations are of Trump supporters, according to classified data obtained by Newsweek."
That data is not the article's only source.
Newsweek
Failed to Disclose [an] Anti-Trump Op-Ed [was] Written by DeSantis Pollsters.
Corporate media outlet Newsweek has been caught failing to disclose that an opinion editorial
attacking former President Donald Trump was written by two employees of a polling firm whose
founder and CEO is the chief pollster for the pro-DeSantis SuperPAC Never Back Down. The
authors, Byron Allen and Amanda Iovino, are both employees of WPA Intelligence, and used their
op-ed column to claim Trump is losing white voters, passing off Never Back Down talking points as
thin analysis. Newsweek makes no mention of WPA Intelligence's affiliation with Never Back Down.
Fake
News Newsweek Mocks Trump for Having 200 Tickets Left Unsold in Arena That Holds 21,000. You really cannot
trust a single thing the fake news mainstream media is reporting anymore. On Saturday night [12/18/2021] President
Trump held an event with Bill O'Reilly in Houston, Texas at the Tokyo Center. The arena was packed to capacity.
But you wouldn't know this if you read fake news Newsweek. The far-left publication actually mocked President Trump for
the 200 tickets that were not sold before the event started this afternoon.
Media
assault on Amy Coney Barrett begins as Trump weighs decision. A media campaign has erupted against Amy Coney
Barrett, even though President Trump hasn't actually nominated her to the Supreme Court. Barrett is clearly the
front-runner, having spent a second straight day at the White House as the president moves toward his Saturday [9/26/2020]
announcement. And of course there should be substantial scrutiny of her record if she's picked, given that replacing
Ruth Bader Ginsburg is a lifetime appointment. But there are early signs this is going to be ugly, and that her
religion will be front and center. That subject came up in 2017 when the Senate approved her as a federal appeals court
judge in Chicago. Newsweek jumped on the judge with a smear that turned out to be factually wrong.
The
Attacks on Judge Barrett Have Already Started. Some left-wingers aren't waiting for Judge Amy Barrett to be
nominated to the Supreme Court to start attacking her. The attacks over the last few days have been steeped in
anti-Catholicism, other types of bigotry, and lazy error. A headline at the left-wing website Refinery29 called
her "the Potential RBG Replacement Who Hates Your Uterus." (I'm guessing she didn't come to have seven children by
hating anyone's uterus.) Newsweek ran a story claiming that she is part of a Catholic group that inspired
Margaret Atwood to write The Handmaid's Tale. It then appended a correction at the bottom of the page noting
that Atwood had referred to a different Catholic group. Oops. Then Refinery29 picked up the smear
and ran with it.
Newsweek
[is] Forced To Issue Major Retraction After It Smears Amy Coney Barrett, Claims. Newsweek magazine has issued a
major correction to an article smearing potential Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett, accusing the 7th Circuit Court of
Appeals judge of belonging to a Catholic sect that "inspired" the novel "The Handmaid's Tale." Initially, Newsweek
claimed that "People of Praise," a charismatic Catholic group to which Barrett reportedly belongs, "served as inspiration for
Margaret Atwood's dystopian novel, The Handmaid's Tale," adding that female members are forced to report to spiritual
superiors known as "handmaids," and that the group stresses that "men have authority over their wives."
Amy
Coney Barrett Is Living The Handmaid's Tale? [Scroll down] One former member described the group
as an: ["]abusive cult in which women are completely obedient to men and independent thinkers are humiliated,
interrogated, shamed and shunned.["] Indeed. After all, Barrett's knuckle-dragging misogynistic religious
fanatic husband has only let the poor woman out of the house twice. Once, to serve a 15-year stint as a law professor
at a highly prestigious university. And again to slave away as a judge on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.
Newsweek Hits a New Low.
If decent people working in mainstream American media want to know why many Americans do not trust them and are willing to
use the term "fake news" to describe the mainstream media, I offer one of the most glaring examples of a lie in my
lifetime. Last week, Newsweek headlined the following: "Conservative Radio Host Ridicules Anne Frank: 'I
Don't Get My Wisdom From Teenagers.'" Now, imagine how that must have struck any reader not familiar with the
"conservative radio host" or with what he actually said. "Ridicule Anne Frank" — what kind of terrible human
being would do that? Well, it turns out the "conservative radio host" was me. Yes, me — a religious
Jew who has devoted much of his life to the welfare of the Jewish people, served on the board of the U.S. Holocaust Museum,
made the most widely viewed pro-Israel video in the world, written a book on anti-Semitism that is in its third printing, and
founded a synagogue and a Jewish day school.
The Fake Leading the Fake.
Are we watching what's left of Western civilization drive itself nuts? Not just Trump, but a whole cast of strange
Washington figures daily appear on TV, saying the most astonishing things. Even the subject matter of public discourse
has gone weird. Shrillness and hysteria are the order of the day. Every statement is shouted in capital
letters. Nor is there any harbor to be found in social media, only more paranoia — amplified by Russian
trolls admired perhaps by fake rental followers from India. There is even fake music. The watchers have been
contaminated. Newsweek has been accused of falsifying their audience traffic. It is now a case of the fake
following the fake.
On Gorka, the crazy left
declares war. [Scroll down] So we learn that Gorka's degree isn't good enough, as if that is the best criterion for judging
whether someone is suitable for executing policy. To support this, we learn he got into a scrap with an obnoxious little academic troll with
a wounded bloated ego named Smith. We read a real whopper of an unsubstantiated claim, from some little known associate professor, accusing
Gorka of plagiarism in his doctoral thesis, with absolutely no substantiation — and substantiation would be very easy. (The funniest part
of these whinings in this pattern of argument is from an earlier article in Newsweek, which claims that since Gorka never submitted an article to
some obscure academic journal called "Terrorism and Political Violence," he can't possibly be of any consequence.) We see name-calling.
We see mangled facts and repackaged narratives. Let's look at some of those.
Newsweek
hit piece smears Bible, Christians. Newsweek's 16-page diatribe portrays Evangelical
Christians as homophobic, right-wing fundamentalist hypocrites who believe an unbelievable Bible.
And just in case the reader misses the writer's subtle nuance, the essay was illustrated with images
of snake handlers, Pat Robertson and the Westboro Baptist Church. That's because in the minds of
Newsweek's esteemed editors, most evangelical Christians spend their weekends dancing with snakes and
picketing gay nightclubs.
Another
Newsweek Conspiracy: 'Greta Thunberg Snubbed for Nobel Peace Prize' By Big Oil. Newsweek reporter Rosie
McCall offered a conspiracy theory as to how a 16-year-old environmental activist somehow failed to win the Nobel Peace Prize
this year: [...] This new theory comes courtesy of a magazine fresh off breaking the news that opening tanning salons in
urban neighborhoods were a plot to give gay men skin cancer, or something. [...] Such speculation amounts to an insult of the
actual Nobel Prize winner, Abiy Ahmed, the prime minister of Ethiopia, who restarted peace talks with neighboring Eritrea and
beginning restoring freedoms in Ethiopia. He helped stop a war, but was barely mentioned by McCall. A European
teenager who performed some angry End Times-style rants was more deserving, in the eyes of the journalists at Newsweek.
The 'Hunger' Hoax.
Twenty years ago, hysteria swept through the media over "hunger in America." Dan Rather opened a CBS Evening
News broadcast in 1991 declaring, "one in eight American children is going hungry tonight." Newsweek,
the Associated Press and the Boston Globe repeated this statistic, and many others joined the media chorus,
with or without that unsubstantiated statistic.
ABC
'The
View' Co-Host Sunny Hostin Directs Her Post-Election Rage at White People in On-Air Rant.
Present-elect Donald Trump's victory on Tuesday is bringing out the absolute worst in every
left-wing media personality just hours after the race was called. With many eager to see how
the shrill panel of "The View" would react to a second Trump term, co-host Sunny Hostin did not
disappoint in giving viewers a stupid racist take when looking for a reason that Vice President
Kamala Harris lost. Rather than admitting Harris' many faults during her campaign, Hostin
took to blaming the defeat on certain people of a certain race. [Tweet with video clip]
Was
the 2024 Election Too Big to Rig? Anyone who watches David Muir at ABC, Lester Holt
at CBS, Norah O'Donnell at NBC, or Amna Nawaz and Geoff Bennett at PBS will know this election was
rigged, thanks to a multi-year propaganda campaign of shameless lying by the news anchors and
reporters at the most prestigious networks in America. If you make it your business to keep
track of what these "trusted news sources" are telling voters, it is obvious how hard they've tried
to influence the election. ABC News, for example, pretty much every single night for the last
few months, has opened their newscast with 5-10 minutes where they heap slime all over Trump
and praise Harris. If you watch the source material, for example, Harris's CNN Town Hall,
then watch the excerpts highlighted on ABC, you get two completely different impressions of her
competence and integrity. Precisely the same tactic is used with Trump, but to the opposite
effect. Watch one of his news conferences in its entirety, then watch what is grabbed, out of
context, and presented on ABC.
We
Are Proven Correct. For years now there has been a long-promoted talking point in the
press that crimes have gone down in this country during the Biden years. This claim has been
in defiance of surges of violence in places like New York and D.C., the drugs and affiliated crimes
with the mounting homeless problem in Los Angeles and San Francisco, and the ongoing reality of
store chains closing locations due to perpetual shoplifting going unaddressed and unabated.
Yet the press has tried to sell us on the concept that things have been calming across the nation
and that claims of criminality spreading is the result of Republican doom-saying for the sake of
the election. Much like the rosy fable of the economy being strong, despite the financial
pains felt by so many, the press promise of a safer nation continues. It was even a feature
during the presidential debate when Donald Trump had to haggle over this, not with his opponent
Kamala Harris, but with moderator David Muir. It has all been a statistical ruse.
Paging
David Muir and ABC News. Moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis of ABC News delivered
a frankly disgusting performance during the September presidential debate between Kamala Harris and
Donald Trump. The network had agreed that there would be no fact checks and no interruptions,
yet the partisan duo proceeded to do exactly that. In fact, Trump was fact-checked at least
five times, while Harris was left to say whatever the heck she wanted (much of it lies).
Perhaps the most infamous moment came when Muir, using his most arrogant, self-important tone,
interrupted Trump on crime statistics. Yes, the former president fought back and tried to
explain why Muir was wrong, but the mission had already been accomplished: they wanted to interrupt
Trump's flow, have him go off on some sideline that wasn't germane to the argument he was
making — and they succeeded. If this were Kamala Harris using these tactics, that
would have been fine — she's supposed to be trying to trip him up — but to
have the supposedly unbiased neutral "moderators" join forces with Kamala was quite simply unethical.
The
impenetrable arrogance of the left media. As the 2024 presidential campaign edges to
a close, the arrogance of the left, especially those in the media, is escalating to a fever
pitch. The best example of their tone-deaf hysteria is Martha Raddatz's attempt to humiliate
J.D.Vance over what she called lies about FEMA and Tren de Aragua. People like Raddatz never
learn from their egregious, foolish mistakes. She tried to assert that the reports of FEMA
failures were false when everyone with a pulse has heard the hundreds of horror stories from the
victims on the ground. She tried to stop Vance from speaking, so determined was she to push
the government-promulgated lie that FEMA has been on the job. She really stepped in it when
she brought up the overtaking of "several apartment complexes" by the Venezuelan gang Tren de
Aragua in Aurora, Colorado, cities in Texas, and Wisconsin. Raddatz suggested that
commandeering these "few apartment complexes" was just a minor annoyance. She tried to stop
Vance from speaking again by saying "I know exactly what happened." But she hasn't a clue and she
clearly has not given the issue any thought. She has no empathy for the hundreds of people
who live in those apartments suffering under these thugs from Venezuelan prisons. They are not a
problem in her neighborhood so it's not a problem. Therefore, Vance and Trump must be lying.
JD
Vance Stunned After Raddatz Minimizes Migrant Gang Takeover Of Apartment Complexes.
Republican Ohio Sen. J.D. Vance appeared shocked Sunday on ABC News when co-host Martha
Raddatz interrupted him mid-statement and attempted to downplay Venezuelan gangs' takeover of
Colorado apartment complexes. The Tren de Aragua gang made U.S. headlines in September after
officials confirmed ten members were involved in an investigation into a string of alleged criminal
incidents at an Aurora, Colorado apartment complex, according to FOX 31. On ABC's "This Week,"
Raddatz pressed Vance on former President Donald Trump's response, noting Trump claimed the city had been
"invaded and conquered" by migrants, while the mayor called the statement "grossly exaggerated."
Complaints
Ask FEC, FCC To Investigate ABC For Breaking Broadcast And Donation Rules In Debate.
Remember that brazenly biased presidential debate on Sept. 10, hosted by ABC television?
The one where ABC moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis "fact-checked" former President Donald
Trump five times and Vice President Kamala Harris, not at all? The one advertised as a
legitimate debate that felt more like a 90-minute campaign commercial for Harris? The Center
for American Rights has filed complaints with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the
Federal Elections Commission (FEC), asking these agencies to hold ABC and its local affiliate
accountable on two matters: an alleged campaign donation violation, and a concern about its
television broadcast license. Unlike print media, broadcast airwaves belong to the
public. While anyone can find some paper, start their own newsletter, and say whatever they
want, there is a finite number of airwaves across the broadcast spectrum, so they belong to
everyone. That is why the FCC licenses segments of the airwaves to broadcasters with the
condition that they must use a certain amount of their broadcast time to serve the public.
The Editor says...
Ahem. Yes, there is a finite bandwidth available for broadcast TV, but the FCC apparently
doesn't see any shortage, because the UHF-TV band used to extend to Channel 83, and has been
gradually pared down as
the FCC sold some of the bandwidth (that's right, the frequencies that "belong to everyone") to the
highest bidder. (When did we vote on that?) Now the UHF-TV band stops at Channel 36,
although some stations may have a "virtual channel" number higher than that. What happened to all
the money that the FCC raked in when the upper UHF-TV channels were sold to cell phone companies?
I suspect it either evaporated or went into several money pits, like NASA, Amtrak, football stadiums,
Ukraine, ethanol subsidies, windmill subsidies, solar panel subsidies, and hotel rooms for illegal aliens.
It's
a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad Fake Presidential Race. [Scroll down] And there is
the matter of the anonymous ABC whistleblower, who released an affidavit claiming that he had
recordings proving that ABC agreed to "fact check" Donald Trump in advance, as well as not ask
certain questions in the debate, as requested by the Harris campaign. Whether she really had
an "audio earring" that was feeding her answers, Harris undeniably was given preferential treatment
by the laughable moderators. One of them, Linsey Davis, was Harris's college sorority sister,
after all. Girlfriends have to stick together. There have been reports that the ABC
whistleblower went on to die in a car crash, reminding us of the precarious shelf life of
whistleblowers. This has been debunked, by the state controlled "fact checkers."
Since we don't know the identity of the whistleblower, how can we know if he's alive?
The
Vacuity of Kamala Harris. The Democrats switched her for the failing president late
in the game and hope with the aid of a partisan press and her dodging any real interviews to hide
from the public her extreme leftist views. The debate with ABC struck most of us as a
softball one-sided one — more like an interview than a debate — with both
"interviewers" (one of whom was her sorority sister) "fact checking" Trump "lies" while allowing
her to gibber on with pre-packaged blather. A whistleblower has provided a credible sworn
affidavit (which he wrote a day before the interview) in which he says she was given sample
questions similar to those which were actually asked, was promised certain questions would be out
of bounds by the interviewers and further, that Trump — but not her — would
be "fact checked" by them. ABC provided a tardy response, which is hardly sufficient. [...]
Yes, this reminds us that ABC contributor Donna Brazile fed Clinton the questions "in anticipation
of a supposedly unscripted townhall meeting" and ABC helped deflect questions about Biden's failing
mental state.
ABC
Is a Collapsing House of Cards. The latest information about ABC News is that
moderator Linsey Davis admits the fact checking was aimed at Donald Trump. This is totally
nuts. It's not acceptable for news agencies protected by the Constitution to do anything like
this. The whistleblower is a hero and we should stand by him. As reported earlier,
moderator Linsey Davis admits fact-checking was only for Trump: [...] ABC News has to get back to
reporting the news and abandon activism or they have to stop pretending they are a news service.
ABC
responds to viral 'whistleblower affidavit' claiming Kamala Harris received debate
help. ABC News insists it did not break debate rules after a document claiming to be
from an anonymous 'whistleblower' said there was close collaboration between the network and Kamala
Harris's team before the presidential showdown. But the network still has not confirmed
whether the document was written by an ABC staffer, or where it was filed before it emerged on X.
The unverified document, said to be a sworn affidavit signed by a notary public on
September 9, has sparked controversy. The document alleges ABC News gave Harris
questions ahead of the debate, along with agreeing to preconditions to give her a leg up
on former President Donald Trump.
The
Media's Criminal Misreporting on Crime. 'President Trump, as you know, the FBI says
overall violent crime is coming down in this country." That was ABC News' David Muir "fact
checking" Donald Trump during his debate with Kamala Harris. Two days later, the Bureau of
Justice Statistics released the results of its national crime victimization survey, which showed
that the number of victims of violent crime was 41% higher in 2023 than in 2020. There were
almost 170,000 more rapes, 300,000 more robberies, 1.4 million more assaults, 300,000 more
claims of domestic violence, and almost 400,000 more crimes with a violent weapon.
ABC
News hits panic button after sworn statement alleging rigged debate, David Muir does damage
control. ABC News is apparently pressing the panic button in the wake of fierce
criticism of its Sept. 10 presidential debate between former President Trump and Vice
President Kamala Harris. A sworn statement by an ABC News whistleblower exposing network bias
favoring Harris continues to be in focus regarding "assurances" to the Democrat's campaign days
before the event. Now David Muir, anchor of ABC's "World News Tonight" and co-moderator of
the debate, is defending his performance during the matchup, as ratings for his evening news
broadcast have plunged some 12% in the aftermath.
Did
the Mainstream Media K.O. Kamala? Shortly after the debate between Kamala Harris and
Donald Trump, leftist pundits began crowing on social media about how conservatives' complaints
about the bias shown by two ABC moderators, David Muir and Linsey Davis, are just proof that Trump
had lost the debate. [...] [{I}ndependent voters] were sold a high-stakes prize fight between
Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, and what they witnessed was the referees methodically landing
haymakers against Donald Trump on behalf of Kamala Harris in between punches. That's very
different than a referee innocently making a bad call or two in a football game. What the
average spectator witnessed in the debate was very obviously nothing less than outright
cheating. And if there's one thing most Americans hate, it's a cheater[;] and any
honest observer would surmise that ABC conspired with the DNC to cheat in that debate.
Cahoots: ABC
Whistleblower Says Harris Camp Allegedly 'Restricted the Scope' of Trump Debate Questions.
Late last week, there was word that an ABC News whistleblower was set to expose both the network and the
Kamala Harris presidential campaign for allegedly rigging the network's Sept. 10th debate in the
Democrat nominee's favor and against former President Donald Trump. The information that they said
would be revealed was that Harris was given advance notice on what questions would be asked, and that
Trump would be fact-checked live. Now, the whistleblower has released a sworn, notarized statement,
which is dated Sept. 9, 2024 — the day before the debate. They say the Kamala Harris campaign
allegedly "restricted the scope" of the ABC News debate questions, that the campaign allegedly demanded
that only Donald Trump would be fact-checked during the debate: [Tweet]
ABC
Moderator Linsey Davis Admits: 'Fact-checking' Was Only Planned for Trump. ABC News'
Linsey Davis, one of two moderators for last week's presidential debate, admitted to the Los
Angeles Times that the plan was only to fact-check former President Donald Trump, and not Vice
President Kamala Harris. As Breitbart News noted, Davis and co-moderator David Muir
fact-checked Trump seven times — often incorrectly — while never
fact-checking Harris once, even when she used hoaxes, such as the Charlottesville "very fine
people" hoax. Davis told the Times that ABC had deliberately targeted
Trump — and only Trump — because of perceptions that he had been allowed to
get away with false statements in the CNN debate against President Joe Biden in late June.
An
ABC employee's sworn affidavit claims ABC cheated to help Kamala win. The Black
Insurrectionist did the legwork and obtained what appears to be a duly signed affidavit from an ABC
employee attesting under oath to the network's staggering corruption to ensure that Kamala Harris
won her single debate against Donald Trump. Secret negotiations, bias, squashed issues,
sample questions...it's all there. Of course, we have only this unknown employee's sworn
assertion that these things happened but, if they did... oh my! Here's the tweet with the
somewhat redacted affidavit: [Tweet] The introductory material in the affidavit says that the
employee is a technical and administrative worker who is not endorsing Trump. He (or she)
simply wants what all Americans want — a fair debate allowing Americans to hear what the
candidates have to say on the issues that matter most. The key substantive allegations (which
currently have no verification other than this sworn testimony) are as follows: [...]
When
does Linsey go work for Kamala? Less than a week into the debate about ABC's
selective fact-finding at the debate, we hear this from Linsey Davis herself. [...] First, thanks
to Linsey Davis for admitting that the fact-checking was selective indeed. No more suspense
or questions about that. Second, who made the decision at ABC that the fact-checking would be
selective? Did Davis and Muir make that call? Or did the word come from up in the
newsroom, the organization, or who knows where? Mark Penn is right that we need an
investigation. Better than that, maybe someone at ABC can accept responsibility and tell us
how something like this could happen.
With
fact-checks like these, how does truth stand a chance? ABC News has been widely
criticized for the bias of the two moderators Linsey Davis and David Muir. Even liberal
outlets acknowledged that the two journalists seemed inclined to "fact check" only Trump. In
the meantime, they allowed clearly false statements from Harris go unchallenged. Three of the
unchecked claims are being widely disseminated by supporters, including some in the media.
Here are three legal "facts" that are being repeated despite being clearly untrue. [#1] "Crime
is down under the Biden-Harris administration." One of the most notable slap downs by ABC
followed Trump commenting that crime rates have drastically risen during the Biden-Harris
administration. Muir immediately balked and declared: "As you know, the FBI says overall
violent crime is coming down in this country." Harris and her allies have been repeating the
claim by ABC. But the actual statistics show that Trump was right. The Justice Department's
released survey found that, under the Biden administration, there has been a significant increase
in crime. Violent crime was up 37 percent from 2020 to 2023, rape is up 42 percent,
robbery is up 63 percent and stranger violence is up 61 percent.
ABC
debate moderator Linsey Davis makes stunning admission about all those live Trump fact checks.
ABC News debate moderator Linsey Davis made a stunning admission about their attempts to 'fact
check' Donald Trump during his debate with Kamala Harris. Republicans were furious at ABC
News moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis for refusing to fact check Harris on her lies about
Trump's views on IVF. In a new interview, Davis says that it was a conscious decision to do the
fact checks after seeing how Trump and Joe Biden performed in the CNN debate in June.
ABC
News Caught Grossly Deceptively Editing Kamala Harris' Disastrous Solo Interview. As
RedState reported, Kamala Harris' first solo interview since wresting the nomination away from Joe
Biden did not go well. The vice president seemed ill-prepared, rambling on about things
unrelated to the questions being presented by ABC News reporter Brian Taff[.] One particularly
egregious example occurred when she was asked to give just two specific things she'd do to bring
down costs for Americans. What followed was a mind-numbing word salad in which she spent
nearly a quarter of the interview (which was only 10 minutes long) rambling about being
"middle class." [Tweet with video clip] [Transcript] The above exchange can be
seen online by going directly to ABC 6's website. Guess who didn't see it? That would
be the network's television audience.
Kamala
Harris disaster solo interview with ABC Philadelphia was pre-taped, not live. As bad
as the softball interview went for Kamala Harris with ABC in Philadelphia yesterday, there is
another important fact to consider. This interview wasn't even live. ABC probably
spliced and edited the video to make Kamala sound as coherent as she could. And it was still an
epic disaster. [Four tweets with video clips.]
Meet
Debate Moderator David Muir! Propagandist for ABC News. In March 2015, ABC
news anchor David Muir — moderator of tonight's presidential debate — began
the broadcast with a recap of the 2014 police shooting in Ferguson, MO the previous year:
"Ferguson, Missouri: An unarmed black man, Michael Brown, is shot to death. The officer
is not indicted." And that was it: "The officer is not indicted." Muir failed to
acknowledge that the whole "hands up, don't shoot" scenario turned out to be a lie invented
by Brown's co-conspirator: ex-con, Dorian Johnson. Muir made no mention of the fact that
the officer, Darren Wilson, wasn't indicted because he was fully exonerated in two separate
investigations. And Muir certainly neglected to report that Obama's own DOJ had cleared
Wilson of any wrongdoing, after a months-long, zealot-driven investigation by Attorney General Eric
Holder. Muir's summary — "Ferguson, Missouri: An unarmed black man, Michael
Brown, is shot to death. The officer is not indicted" — is nothing short of
Goebbels-like propaganda.
And
now it's Mark Penn. The ABC ambush of Trump, originally called the Trump-Harris
debate, keeps on keeping on. [...] My main issue for me is: was it a premeditated ambush. Who
wrote the questions? No questions about China or hostages but lots of questions about 2020.
Who decided to have all of those "fact checks" on cue? Were the moderators contacted during
the debate with information about challenging Trump on this or that? At some point, as they
do with lawfare, good people have to look at the TV and ask if this weaponization of the media is
good for the country. I have no problem with anti-Trump websites or news programs, such as
the nightly programming at MSNBC. However, this was presented to the public as a debate, not
another "get Trump" hour. ABC has a quite a bit to explain on this story.
*IF*
This Is True, ABC News Is About to Become Engulfed in a Major Scandal. I asked
yesterday morning whether Kamala Harris' camp got the ABC News debate questions in advance.
The vice president was visibly nervous for the first portion of the debate but got into a groove,
especially when she figured out that Donald Trump would take the bait she was chumming. [...]
[Tweet] Harris seemed ready for the questions, which explained her word salad responses, but
she never answered any of the questions from moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis. They did
fact-check Trump live, though these interruptions were peppered with fake news — no
shock there. Harris was never pressed for her mountain of lies, and we know why: an ABC
whistleblower is alleging that not only did the Harris camp get questions in advance, but that she
was given assurances that she wouldn't be fact-checked by the moderators either. I'm not
saying this is fact, but if this is true, it's a major scandal: [Multiple tweets]
There are bits and pieces of evidence that suggest a rigged game everywhere. In 2016,
Democrats did just that with Hillary Clinton. Donna Brazile, a CNN contributor at the time,
sent the Clinton camp advanced copies of the debate questions.
Linsey
Davis Reveals How She, David Muir and ABC News Schemed to Protect Kamala Harris. ABC
News anchor Linsey Davis revealed in a post-debate Los Angeles Times puff-piece profile how she,
ABC World News Tonight anchor David Muir and ABC producers schemed to ambush President Trump with
'fact checks' at Tuesday night's presidential debate in Philadelphia with Kamala Harris after
watching Trump crush and knock Joe Biden out of the race in their June debate. The fact
checking at the debate was one-sided, with Trump being interrupted by Muir and Davis several times
with 'fact checks' while Harris was not 'fact checked' once. Going into the debate, there was
concern about Harris' friendship with a Disney executive who oversees the ABC News division (NY
Post excerpt): ["]Dana Walden, a senior Disney executive whose portfolio includes ABC
News, is one of Vice President Kamala Harris' "extraordinary friends," according to a report in the
New York Times. Walden and Harris have known each other since 1994, while their husbands,
Matt Walden and Doug Emhoff, have known each other since the 1980s. [...] ["] After the
debate it was revealed that ABC did not disclose that Davis is an Alpha Kappa Alpha sorority sister
of Harris.
If
True, the ABC News Presidential Debate Could Be Rocked by Explosive Scandal. Anyone
who watched the presidential debate hosted by ABC News on Tuesday knows that the moderators were
biased and repeatedly fact-checked Trump while letting Kamala Harris's lies go unchallenged.
We kind of expected that to happen, as the bias and conflicts of interests of the moderators and
the network as a whole were well established. However, there are reports now that an ABC News
whistleblower is about to come forward with evidence that Kamala was given sample questions before
the debate. [Two tweets] The reports appear to originate from this post from an X/Twitter
user who says he or she will release "an affidavit from an ABC whistleblower regarding the debate."
[Tweet] "I have just signed a non-disclosure agreement with the attorney of the whistleblower,"
the post claims. "The affidavit states how the Harris campaign was given sample question which
were essentially the same questions that were given during the debate and separate assurances of fact
checking Donald Trump and that she would NOT be fact checked. Accordingly, the affidavit states
several other factors that were built into the debate to give Kamala a significant advantage."
Former
top Clinton adviser calls on ABC to launch internal probe into whether debate was
rigged. Mark Penn, a former top adviser to Bill and Hillary Clinton, called Thursday
for ABC to launch a formal internal investigation into its news division's planning and execution
of this week's presidential debate to determine if there was some effort at "rigging the outcome of
this debate." ABC News came under significant bipartisan criticism because its moderators
fact-checked some of Donald Trump's statements but not a single pushback at any made by Kamala
Harris. Trump said Thursday that the debate was three-on-one and declined to participate in
another one before the election. Anchors David Muir and Linsey Davis moderated the first
debate between Harris and Trump, which drew 67.1 million viewers, making it the most watched
presidential debate since 2008. But it has drawn scorn from both Republicans and Democrats for
giving the appearance of bias. [...] Other publications have disclosed a questionable coziness
between Harris and Dana Walden, co-chairman of Disney and who oversees ABC News. The New
York Times quoted Harris as calling their relationship "extraordinary friends," and disclosed
that Walden and Harris are neighbors in Brentwood, a wealthy Los Angeles enclave where Ms. Harris
and her husband also own a residence.
A
forgettable Warped Debate. The September 10th presidential debate went down as
expected. [...] The ABC moderators proved they were predictably and shamelessly biased. [...]
Harris's instructions were not to explain her agenda. She never defended disowning policies
that she had embraced as a lifelong, self-confessed, "woke" "radical." Instead, Harris's
threefold strategy was simple enough — and it mostly worked. One, goad Trump as a
coward and racist. Then smile and call for unity, kindness, and an end to such name-calling.
[...] Two, Harris predictably once more reinvented herself. She erased entirely her
upper-middle class, privileged upbringing, as a child of two PhDs. There was no mention that
her radical political career was opportunistically gifted by her insider and paramour fixer, the
married Bay-Area left-wing politico Wille Brown, over 30 years her senior. Instead,
Harris became a middle-class child of a struggling small businesswoman. [...] Three, everything
else in the debate was outsourced to the ABC "moderators," David Muir and Linsey Davis. Both
apparently calculated that if it was a question between blatantly helping Harris or appearing
intellectually and professionally honest, then it was a no-brainer, partisan choice.
The Editor says...
Harris was installed in the office of Vice President as the result of a stolen election in 2020.
Anyone who would accept that position, knowing she doesn't deserve it, would probably not hesitate
to accept illicit assistance from the people producing a debate on TV.
ABC
Failed to Disclose Debate Conflict of Kamala Harris and Linsey Davis Being AKA Sorority
Sisters. ABC News failed to disclose that Kamala Harris and ABC News anchor Linsey
Davis, who co-moderated Tuesday night's debate between Harris and President Trump, are sorority
sisters in the influential Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc. AKA formed a PAC in August after
Harris became the Democrats' presidential nominee. The sorority connection is one more
possible clue as to why the debate moderated by Davis and ABC World News Tonight anchor David Muir
was so one-sided in favor of Harris. Muir and Davis interrupted Trump numerous times to fact
check and argue with him while they did not fact check Harris even one time. While the
sorority connection was not mentioned at the debate, Davis did speak about it during ABC's coverage
of the Biden-Harris inaugural in January 2021: [Tweet]
There's
allegedly an affidavit claiming ABC gave Kamala the questions before the debate. One
of the things that was obvious during the debate was that Kamala came in with a lot of memorized
material. Those who like her were impressed by how well-prepared she was. Those who
don't like her noted that she had to memorize everything because she is incapable of answering
substantive questions on the fly — and that her memorized answers were platitudes,
canned phrases, and blatant lies. What didn't occur to those of us who dislike Kamala was
that the memorized lines invariably went right to the heart of the questions. Weird,
huh? That perfect alignment of prepared material and questions could, of course, have come
about because it was fairly obvious what the moderators would ask. After all, we knew that
they would frame the questions to support Kamala and hurt Trump. However, we believed that,
after the scandal of Donna Brazile giving Hillary the debate questions in 2016, there was no way
that the Democrats would try that cheat again. It turns out that we might have been a bit
naïve.
The
Debate at the Kitchen Table. ABC staged a debate this week. A presidential
debate. Ostensibly between former president Donald J. Trump and former senator Kamala Harris,
but in actuality between Trump and the partnership of Harris and ABC. There is always media
bias. To some extent, unconscious media bias is unavoidable. But we don't expect it to
be blatant; the viewer doesn't expect antics like we saw this week, when the ABC moderators
repeatedly declared Mr. Trump's statements lies, and never called out Ms. Harris's
blatant lies. We call it "fact-checking" today, a term coined in social media for when our
high-tech overlords punish a writer for stating something with which the gurus disagree. But
it's not really fact-checking, is it? It's an invasion of a conversation, a denial of free
speech, a thumb on the scale. In the case of a presidential debate, it's electioneering.
And it virtually invalidates the value of our constitutionally protected free press in this
process. ABC's refusal even to try to act as an impartial host rendered this debate useless.
The
worst debate in the history of presidential debates. Not one question Tuesday night
about the execution of Hersh Goldberg-Polin and five other hostages two weeks ago, or about any of
the Americans murdered by Hamas terrorists on October 7? Not one question on Iran, which
is within weeks of acquiring a nuclear weapon and which is paying and perhaps precisely directing
repeated attacks by its proxies on American forces in the Gulf or Arabia, the Red Sea, Iraq or
Jordan? Not one question about the capacity of President Joe Biden to continue as
president? And not one, single fleeting question about the People's Republic of China, and
its genocide against the Uyghurs, its oppression of Hong Kong, its threat against Taiwan or the
Philippines, or its military buildup, the largest, most expensive peacetime military buildup in
history? Perhaps ABC's parent Disney put the kibosh on questions that would upset the
People's Republic of China and endanger the company's theme parks in the country or the release of
its movies in China? Who knows?
The
Debate Was So Biased It Was Divorced From Reality. Trump Should Refuse To Do
Another. Tuesday night during the presidential debate between former President Trump
and Vice President Kamala Harris, the fact-checks were flying, but only in one direction. As
expected, ABC News moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis were criminally biased, making the debate
effectively three-on-one against Trump and practically amounting to an in-kind donation to the
Harris campaign. The lying and gaslighting were so brazen from Harris, and the
"fact-checking" from Muir and Davis so lop-sided (they failed even once to push back or correct any
of Harris' obvious falsehoods), that the entire spectacle eventually took on an air of
unreality. It was bizarre to see it happening live on the air. By the end, my main
takeaway was that the purpose of these debates, besides the media's obvious goal of boosting Harris
and hurting Trump, is to confuse and demoralize the American people by distorting reality and
flooding the internet with lies, making it impossible to know what's true and what's not.
Starve the collapsing
corporate media of their sham debates. I very much doubt that any of what transpired
last night moved the needle in any particular direction, and political pundits are often very
disconnected from the general public. So instead of wasting time on more highlights, it's
better to consider what can be done to avoid the absolute lunacy we witnessed last night from ABC.
This should be the last election cycle with legacy media debates. Ever. No more excuses,
GOP. Just stop accommodating this madness and being complicit in it. Last night was
much more an interrogation of Donald Trump than anything resembling a debate. "Why won't you
recognize the 2020 election? Do you wish you had done more on Jan 6? Why are you so
racist, sir? Why are you attacking our climate hoax?" How is any of that considered a
debate? It was the worst debate production of all time and the American people are the
biggest losers here. I don't recall a single question of importance. It was full
clownworld from beginning to end.
ABC's
David Muir Lied About Crime Falling Under Biden-Harris. The ABC moderators for the
presidential debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris couldn't have been more biased.
Not once did they fact-check Harris' long list of lies. But I will leave the fact-checking of
David Muir and Linsey Davis' lies to others. I will focus on only one of Muir's discussions
on crime. DAVID MUIR: "President Trump, as you know, the FBI says overall violent crime is
coming down in this country, ..." In fact, Trump was correct about the increase in crime
under Biden. While violent crime fell by 17 percent under Trump, Biden has seen it rise
by 43 percent. Muir doesn't understand what the FBI is measuring. The FBI counts
the number of crimes reported to police. Trump was right that less than half of police
departments are now giving that data to the FBI, but, more importantly, Trump was discussing what
was happening to total crime, not just the number of crimes reported to police.
ABC
News Moderators Turned Debate Into A Partisan Show Trial Against Trump. Millions of
Americans tuned in to ABC News on Tuesday for what was supposed to be the first presidential debate
of the election. Instead, they witnessed a one-sided show trial where ABC News served as the
judge, jury, and executioner, as pointed out by Turning Point USA Founder Charlie Kirk on X.
ABC News' David Muir and Linsey Davis spent 90 minutes running election interference for Vice
President Kamala Harris by ambushing former President Donald Trump. Rather than addressing
soaring inflation, rising gas prices, fake job numbers, and the deadly border crisis, the Bobbsey
Twins decided to focus on platitudes while Harris got away with murder — yes,
murder. Not once did Harris have to answer for her border crisis that has left innocent
Americans brutally raped and murdered, but then again, she wasn't the one on trial, Trump
was. Muir tried, for example, to pin Jan. 6 on Trump but conveniently omitted that
Trump clearly called for a "peaceful" protest that day.
ABC
Moderators Called Out as Double Standard Becomes Evident: 'A Disgraceful Failure'.
Tuesday night's debate was by no means a fair fight. The debate marked the first time that
former President Donald Trump clashed with Vice President Kamala Harris. Many supporters of
both candidates — as well as moderates still making up their minds on who to vote
for — were looking forward to seeing the two candidates go head-to-head[.]
Unfortunately, Tuesday night's debate didn't provide us with a one-on-one debate. Instead, it
was three-on-one. ABC's two moderators, news anchors David Muir and Linsey Davis, constantly
attacked, fact-checked and pressed Trump to answer questions. When it came to Harris, the kid
gloves were on; they barely pressed her at all, even when she refused to answer questions.
ABC
Breaks Its Own Rules Less Than 30 Minutes Into Debate. ABC News broke the agreed
upon rules by allowing Vice President Kamala Harris to interrupt former President Donald Trump as
he was answering a question about abortion during Tuesday night's presidential debate. Trump
first explained his position that following the overturning of Roe v. Wade by the Supreme
Court in the summer of 2022, the issue has returned to the states for the people to decide.
Harris pledged to reinstitute Roe v. Wade by federal law, if elected and if Congress passed
the legislation. Trump respectfully listened as Harris made her points. [Tweet with
video clip] Harris then claimed that Trump will sign a national abortion ban. Trump
responded, "There she goes again. It's a lie. I'm not signing a ban, and there's no reason
to sign a ban because we've gotten what everybody wanted." [Tweet with video clip]
Blaming
the Moderators Is Not Enough. Project 2025. Charlottesville. "Bloodbath." Trump's
Afghanistan plan. ABC News' debate "moderators" David Muir and Linsey Davis were partisan hacks who
operated on behalf of Kamala Harris throughout the night. They "fact-checked" Donald Trump 11 times
while allowing multiple lies from Harris to go unchecked. In fact, they didn't fact-check a single one of
her many lies. And this is a good thing... at least it could be. For the Trump campaign, it's a
GREAT thing if they choose to capitalize on it. They are already noting how badly the moderators
acted. [Tweets] This is good. We want everyone to know that the debate, like so many
things in this and previous elections, was rigged. But it can't end there. The Trump team and
his surrogates MUST do what ABC News failed to do. They must fact check Harris themselves.
Here's a good start. [Tweet with video clip]
Fact
Check: ABC Moderators Silent As Kamala Harris Repeats Hoaxes About Trump and
Race. CLAIM: Kamala Harris claimed that Donald Trump "refused to rent property to
black families" and called for the "execution" of the Central Park Five. VERDICT: FALSE.
These are both inaccurate claims, which the ABC News moderators allowed to stand uncorrected.
ABC News' Linsey Davis and David Muir frequently tried to fact-check former President Trump and
never once did the same to Vice President Harris — and it wasn't because she was telling
the truth. In a responding to a question about race, Harris claimed that Trump had "refused
to rent property to black families."
3
on 1: Trump Clashes With Harris — and the Debate 'Moderators'. ABC's
debate moderators' performance in Tuesday night's presidential debate made CNN's performance in
June look like a master class in fairness, objectivity, and balance. It was exactly the kind
of debate moderation left-wing commentators on X have been demanding for months — years,
really. They don't want anything approaching objectivity. They wanted moderators to
"fact-check" former President Donald Trump every step of the way while allowing his opponent to
pontificate on questions they think will be beneficial to Democratic Party fortunes. And
that's essentially what happened. ABC News anchors David Muir and Linsey Davis continually
"fact-checked" Trump in real time, arguing with him after nearly every answer. That makes for
a horrible debate format.
ABC
News 'Moderators' Made a Joke of the Presidential Debate. If moderators do their job
correctly, nobody talks about them afterward. Unless one becomes a legendary moderator like
Jim Lehrer, debate watchers don't remember who the moderator was. [...] Not a single sentient being
expected ABC News moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis to be impartial in any way given their
history of reporting on the candidates, but the partisanship and unequal treatment of the
candidates went far beyond any expectations and set a new standard for how not to moderate a
debate. Muir and Davis repeatedly fact-checked Trump (with questionable or outright false
"facts"); jumped in to help Harris when she was floundering by switching topics or interjecting
"gotcha" questions at Trump; bird-dogged Trump to pin him down on a yes-or-no answer while not
doing the same to Harris; ignored blatant lies by Harris, and inserted their own opinions and
thoughts about Trump's answers.
On
'The View,' Kamala Harris Is a 'Moderate,' She Isn't a 'Leftist'. As has been the
case with the left-wing media, "The View" ladies yet again asked "us" (their equally delusional
viewers) to suspend disbelief and buy into the preposterous notion that Harris is a "moderate."
Sara Haines kicked off the festivities. [...]
George
Stephanopoulos Claims Trump and His Voters are Responsible for the Assassination Attempt.
A pair of ABC News personalities on Sunday morning argued that Donald Trump and his supporters bear
responsibility for the attempt on his life that took place when a gunman shot him at a Pennsylvania
rally the night before. "Violent rhetoric" from Trump and the millions of Americans who agree
with his policies was to blame for the 45th president's brush with death, argued George
Stephanopoulos and Martha Raddatz. "President Trump and his supporters have contributed to
this violent rhetoric as well," said Stephanopoulos, a well-known Democrat and former senior
advisor to Bill Clinton.
George
Stephanopoulos Blames Trump and Trump Supporters' "Violent Rhetoric" for Shooting.
It's oddly suspicious that the leading presidential candidate was almost murdered last night in
front of tens of thousands of supporters and millions watching at home as he faces off against Joe
Biden, a man who can't string a sentence together and has weaponized the government against
political opponents and dissidents since day one in office. Here's a clip of Democrat media
personalities, celebrities, and politicians fear-mongering, calling for violence, and even calling
for Trump's assassination over the years: [Advertisement] [Video clip]
George
Stephanopoulos: A Cast Study in America's Psychological Warfare. Many Americans
are paying attention to daily news events. But more need to see beyond the daily events to
the larger plot. Part of that larger plot involves understanding that we're now living in an
environment of psychological warfare. [...] Certain peeks behind certain curtains can offer
glimpses into dynamics that are usually hidden beneath the surface. Enough peeks can
transform suckers into seers. This isn't easy to do but a recent incident can help make it
clear. Anyone interested in learning the evil magician's tricks could study the encounter
between George Stephanopoulos and Nancy Mace on March 9th. First, a quick aside:
Stephanopoulos once worked as press secretary for Bill Clinton. He was paid to manage
narratives to help achieve Democrat/communist political agendas. From there, he became Chief
Anchor at ABC News. This fact alone should have alarmed us long ago — a blinking
red warning sign that there's something profoundly off about journalism and media today. It's
absurd. In a media system that is what it pretends to be, Stephanopoulos — a Democratic
operative pretending to be a journalist — and the executives who hired him would have been
fired long ago, and ABC would have been discredited as a news organization for even trying.
Trump
Sues ABC News, Host George Stephanopoulos for Defamation. Former President Donald
Trump filed a lawsuit on Monday against the American Broadcasting Companies (ABC) and ABC News host
George Stephanopoulos, accusing them of defamation. The complaint alleges that
Mr. Stephanopoulos defamed President Trump on March 10, during an episode of "This Week
With George Stephanopoulos," when he repeatedly stated during the broadcast that a jury had found
President Trump liable for the rape of writer E. Jean Carroll, despite being "aware of the
truth." "These statements were and remain false, and were made by Defendant Stephanopoulos
with actual malice or with a reckless disregard for the truth given that Defendant Stephanopoulos
knows that these statements are patently and demonstrably false," the complaint reads.
President Trump's complaint alleges that Mr. Stephanopoulos was aware that the jury did not
find the former president liable for rape, "yet still falsely stated otherwise."
The
Amorality of ABC's George Stephanopoulos. It is probable that ABC's Good Morning
America host George Stephanopoulos genuinely feels he did nothing wrong in publicly assaulting rape
victim Nancy Mace. His sleazy past portrays a politically obsessed hatchet-swinger without
conscience. Last Sunday, Stephanopoulos savaged Rep. Mace of South Carolina.
Though her appearance had been proposed as an opportunity to share insights on 2024's presidential
contest, the devious GMA host opened the segment by attacking the victim of a teenage rape.
[Brief transcript] With that, Stephanopoulos launched his ambush offensive. The
miniature monster included numerous lies in that single paragraph. There were no juries in
the Trump/E. Jean Carroll case. The former president was not found liable for rape, but
rather "sexual abuse" — that's a pivotal legal distinction. During her retort,
Mace insisted "I'm not going to sit here on your show and be asked a question meant to shame me
about another potential rape victim." The GMA host purred that he had done no such thing,
though all watching had just witnessed him doing precisely that.
George
Stephanopoulos Lies About Trump and 'Rape'. CLAIM: ABC News' George Stephanopoulos
claimed that former President Donald was "found liable for rape by a jury." VERDICT: FALSE. A
jury in New York found that Trump was not liable for rape in a lawsuit brought by E. Jean
Carroll. Stephanopoulos repeatedly claimed, as he interviewed Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC),
that Trump had been found "liable" for "rape." In fact, he was found not to be liable; he was found
liable for "sexual abuse" and, later for defamation. There are problems with both of those
verdicts, but even if Trump were liable (in a civil sense, not a criminal one, as Mace noted), the
fact is that he was never found liable for rape. And it borders on defamation for
Stephanopoulos to claim otherwise.
ABC
Freaks Over 'No Evidence' for Biden Impeachment, Implies It's Illegal. As we saw on
Wednesday morning and evening, ABC News was almost foaming on Thursday's Good Morning
America with a half-dozen shrieks of "no evidence" over House Republicans voting to formally
launch an impeachment inquiry into President Biden and allegations he was enriched by foreign
business dealings involving his corrupt son Hunter (and brother Jim). At one point, they even
implied it might not even be constitutional.
Anchor
Diplomacy: ABC's Muir Asks Bibi Six Times For A 'Humanitarian Pause' In Gaza.
One is left wondering what, exactly, ABC World News Tonight anchor David Muir tried to
accomplish during his interview with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, which very quickly
veered into a negotiation over the long sought-after "humanitarian pause" in Gaza. Watch
this condensed excerpt of the interview, wherein Muir presses Netanyahu, on SIX different
occasions, for said humanitarian pause: [Video clip]
Disney-owned
ABC News profiles child identifying as transgender at 3 years old: 'I'm a girl person'. ABC
News, a company owned by Disney, published a sympathetic profile about parents in Texas who claim their
child came out as transgendered at age 3. "When she was 3, one day, she told me, 'I'm a girl person,'
a parent told ABC News in a story published Sunday. It was National Daughters Day "and she said,
'Can I be your daughter?' — which made me cry," the mother, who went by "Susan" for the story,
told ABC News.
The Editor says...
The incident described above almost certainly didn't happen the way it is described. How many
people have heard of "Daughters Day?" How many three-year-olds have a vocabulary that includes "daughter?"
In the absence of social media and the lust for fame, how many parents would change the way they treat a
three-year-old son based on one transient exploratory question?
ABC
News Admits It Censored RFK Jr. Interview For "False Claims About Covid-19 Vaccines".
In a remarkable video, ABC News presented a pre-recorded interview with presidential candidate
Robert F. Kennedy, telling viewers that parts of what was said had been edited out because he said
something about the COVID vaccine that the news network disagrees with. The interview was
aired with clear edits made during parts where Kennedy spoke about his views on vaccines. The
interviewer Linsey Davis asked RFK Jr. about his belief that vaccination was linked to autism,
which he began to explain before she jumped in and claimed that has all been debunked. The
footage then skipped to a different topic entirely. After the interview concluded, Davis told
viewers "We should note that during our conversation, Kennedy made false claims about the Covid-19
vaccines." She claimed "Data shows that the Covid-19 vaccine has prevented millions of
hospitalizations and deaths from the disease." [...] "We've used our editorial judgment in not
including extended portions of that exchange in our interview," Davis explained.
The Editor says...
Who is Linsey Davis? Is she a doctor? Is she a lawyer? Does she claim to know
more about vaccines than the person she was interviewing?
"47 USC 315 makes it illegal for TV networks to censor Presidential candidates" ABC
News censors RFK Jr. interview remarks on Covid vax problems, may have violated federal law.
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. is a bigger problem for the Democrats and their media arm than they
realized. The blowback from an interview with Linsey Davis that aired Thursday on ABC
demonstrates the nature of the problem. You see, before airing the taped interview, ABC
censored his comments attacking the effectiveness and safety of the Covid vaccines. [...] I rarely
watch ABC, but I assume that it, like other network television broadcasters, airs lots of ads for
pharmaceutical makers, who have become some of the biggest television advertisers of all ever since
their ads were permitted (a bad idea, in my book).
ABC
'News' Edits Out Robert F. Kennedy's Jr's Covid Vaccine Comments. ABC News aired an
interview with Democratic presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. this week. The
interview did not air in full. Rather, ABC edited the conversation to exclude Kennedy's
commentary on Covid-19 vaccines. ABC News Live anchor Linsey Davis announced the edit on
air. Like the good little girl she is, she read what her bosses wrote verbatim: "We
should note that during our conversation, Kennedy made false claims about the COVID-19
vaccines. We've used our editorial judgment in not including portions of that exchange in our
interview. [...]" [...] The corporate press holds itself up as a group of experts. But it's
far from that. Particularly when deducing what is "false." The same network that censored
RFK on the topic of the vaccine long told viewers the vaccine would stop the spread. It did
not. ABC reported that the jab would prevent infection. It did not do that
either. The outlet parroted the talking point that the virus originated in a wet
market. Yet, the U.S. Energy Department and the FBI say no, the virus most likely formed in a
Wuhan lab. Another conspiracy turned reality. ABC promulgated the idea that plexiglass
barriers worked. That cloth masks were effective. That school closures protected
children And that our "experts" accurately counted the fatality rate. Wrong. All of
it. ABC "News" proved itself to be a beacon of Covid untruths. Yet it has the gall to
suppress an interviewee and accuse him of spreading vaccine misinformation.
The
media-Deep State mind meld. ABC recently went so far as to blur out the front of the
podium at which Donald Trump was delivering his post-indictment speech, so those watching couldn't
see the number that was placed there for them to text if they wanted to receive official campaign
notifications and updates. Yet no network has ever deigned to prevent people from reading any
message on any podium at which Joe Biden was speaking, before or after he became president.
Mass Shooting
Statistics. When a mass murderer shot her way into a Nashville school on Monday and
killed six people, most Americans reacted with horror. Gun control advocates, however, viewed
it as an opportunity. President Joe Biden, for example, saw the crime as a chance to promote
an "assault weapon" ban. Randi Weingarten, the president of the American Federation of
Teachers, responded with a call for gun confiscation. The corporate media pitched in with a
spate of stories claiming that mass shootings literally occur on a daily basis in the United
States. ABC News, for example, ran a story titled, "There have been more mass shootings
than days in 2023, database shows." In order to take this headline seriously, it's
necessary to believe that more than 90 mass shootings have occurred since the beginning of the
year. This is obviously not true, so where did ABC get its information?
What Is
Going On At 'The View'? The Disney-owned ABC political talk show program, "The View,"
hasn't had true conservative representation on its daytime panel since Meghan McCain's 2021
retirement. After a few conservative sit-ins offered an occasional rebuke to the unhinged
commentary peddled by the four permanent co-hosts, the producers who tested new hires for McCain's
replacement ultimately went with another talking head from CNN. "I was told when I left, they
were looking for a real conservative," McCain told Variety Magazine in the fall of 2021. "I
gave them a list. None of them have tested." If the panelists really wanted an on-air
challenge, they could have brought on Ann Coulter, who wasn't even offered a chance to
audition. Alyssa Farah Griffin, on the other hand, checked the boxes "The View" actually
wanted, as a Trump defector happy to reverse herself on nearly every issue to land lucrative
television gigs.
ABC
Appalled Armed Robber Got Stopped By Armed Good Samaritan. Seemingly on the side of criminals, ABC's
Good Morning America was appalled on Monday [1/9/2023] after they learned that an armed good Samaritan in
Houston, Texas shot and killed an armed robber who was holding up an entire restaurant. They portrayed the hero as
ducking police and the source of the fear in the restaurant that night. All of this was part of their anti-gun
narrative that bars even defensive uses of firearms.
'The
View' is the biggest source of misinformation in America. Barbara Walters died last week at 93, but the
legendary journalist's legacy lives on: "The View," the daytime-TV talker she created in 1997, is the
most-watched — and most-talked-about — show in its genre. Some legacy, though: What Walters
envisioned as "women of different generations, backgrounds and views" discussing "the topics of the day, mixing humor
with intelligent debate," devolved after she departed as co-host in 2014 into a four-against-one daily catfight with few
laughs and even fewer smarts. The New York Times calls it "the most important political TV show in America."
If so, America is in trouble — because "The View" is the biggest source of misinformation in the
country. More than 2.4 million people watch "The View" every day — and are less informed for it
every day. The show's moderator is one of its worst offenders.
Texas
governor blasts 'clueless' media after ABC reporter suggests GOP to blame for border crisis.
Gov. Greg Abbott, R-Texas, ripped into the media after a veteran ABC journalist suggested Republicans' rhetoric is
partially to blame for the crisis at the southern border. Abbott responded Tuesday to a clip from his interview
with Martha Raddatz after she said she had never heard President Biden use the term "open border" while instead
recounting such rhetoric from Abbott, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, and former President Donald Trump. Abbott
told "Jesse Watters Primetime" that Raddatz's claim that such messaging "reverberates in Mexico and beyond" while being
acted upon by cartel smugglers is simply untrue.
ABC's
Raddatz Blames Trump, DeSantis & Abbott for Border Crisis. On ABC's This Week, during her interview
with Texas Republican Governor Greg Abbott, co-moderator Martha Raddatz suggested that Republican messaging on the
border is what's causing the massive influx of migrants pouring across the southern border. According to Raddatz,
Republicans stating aloud the fact that the border isn't secured, is the reason for the border crisis, not the fact that
the border is unsecured. "You talk about the border wall, you talk about open borders, I don't think I've ever
heard President Biden say, we have an open border come on over," Raddatz said. "But people I have heard say it are
you, are former President Trump, Ron DeSantis, that message reverberates in Mexico and beyond. So they do get the
message that it is an open border and smugglers use all those kinds of statements," Raddatz ridiculously claimed.
They
lie, and nobody cares but us. We all like to make fun of The View. [...] Nobody who follows politics even
moderately closely takes them seriously. But The View gets a lot of views, and as with late night hosts who spread
disinformation behind the mask of telling jokes, nobody can or does hold them to account for being liars. And they
aren't only stupid, they are liars and propagandists. They serve a purpose in the media ecosystem, training their
viewers to hate and be scared of anybody who opposes The Narrative™. They often know that what they are
spewing is false, and know they will not be held to account.
Turning
Point USA Issues Cease and Desist Letters to ABC News Calling on Them to "Retract The Defamatory Statements".
Turning Point USA is a powerful conservative activist organization dedicated to fighting woke college agendas. The
Radical Left and the Fake News Media will do anything to stop them from exposing the indoctrination on college
campuses. Turning Point's recent Student Action Summit event in Florida featured top conservative speakers, including
President Trump and Governor Ron Desantis. The View's angry leftist co-hosts made false claims on the air about the
student activist organization on Monday, saying that they welcomed alleged "neo-nazi" protestors into an event.
Turning
Point Just Nuked 'The View' for Their 'Defamatory Statements'. Anyone who watches "The View" expecting to get
something even close to news or, for that matter, accuracy would be sorely mistaken. They've shown over and over again
they have problems with basic facts. [...] "The View" and their silliness were back in the news after they started spreading
all kinds of nonsense about the Turning Point USA event in Tampa that had a Neo-Nazi group show up outside the event.
We reported about the group and our own Deputy Managing Editor Brandon Morse, who was at the Turning Point event, mocked
them. Even though Turning Point formally denounced the Neo-Nazi group, "The View" harpies still spread false
statements. Joy Behar claimed that the Nazis were outside the event and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis "did nothing,"
but he wasn't even at the event then — he'd been there the day before. Then Whoopi Goldberg said, even
though Turning Point denounced the Nazi group, "But you let them in, and you knew what they were." That was a
lie — they were never allowed into the event and they didn't even try to get in. The group was protesting
the event outside on the sidewalk.
Update: 'The
View' Bends the Knee, Formally Apologizes to TPUSA for 'Nazi' Smear. The far-left daytime talk show "The View"
may have gained another co-host over the last few days after former Mike Pence staffer Alyssa Farrah completed her grift for
the job. But the show almost gained a lawsuit as well. The backstory involves a series of delusional rants made
by Whoopi Goldberg and Joy Behar on Monday regarding the recent TPUSA summit in Florida. In an attempt to trash
Gov. Ron DeSantis, the two hosts claimed that TPUSA had let "nazis" into their conference and tried to draw a line
between them and the Florida governor. That was, of course, completely false, and was known to be false at the
time. In fact, RedState's own Brandon Morse was on the ground and filmed himself mocking the "nazis." There
was no support for them there, and TPUSA had no connection to the group.
The
harridans on 'The View' got rebuked by their own legal department. Turning Point USA had its summit in Florida
last week and, predictably, a lot of manifestly fake Nazis showed up, to imply that American conservatives, who are dedicated
to individual liberty, are in fact National Socialists, who are, well, socialists. Only very stupid people
would believe that this small group with their fresh-out-of-the-package banners were Nazis — and that brings me to
the gals on ABC's The View. Their credulous opinings were so bad that ABC had to read a statement rejecting their
assertions about Turning Point USA.
Democrats
always know corporate media will help them. In conservative communications circles, operatives often lament,
"It must be so easy to be a Democrat." The frustration is always there because the bulk of the corporate media sees the
world the same way as Democrat office holders and candidates, and the battle for favorable — or even
neutral — coverage is never-ending and sometimes seemingly unwinnable. Constantly, there are new examples
that illustrate the point. Just this past Tuesday, Democratic Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ilhan Omar were
among other lawmakers "arrested" during a pro-abortion protest in front of the U.S. Supreme Court. The members of
Congress were cited for blocking the street after repeated warnings to move, escorted to a nearby "staging area," and
provided snacks and water while they took self-congratulatory selfies. Naturally, there were plenty of news cameras
present and ABC was able to snap the money shots of Ms. Ocasio-Cortez and Ms. Omar being led away, apparently with
their hands cuffed behind their backs. That image was blasted out to ABC News' 17.6 million Twitter followers.
Only there weren't any handcuffs.
Joy Behar claims, with zero
evidence, voting rights [are] being stripped from Black people. Joy Behar, co-host of 'The View' has claimed
that voting rights are being taken away from African Americans. She made this claim during an episode celebrating
Juneteenth and provided no evidence to back up her bold claim. [Video clip] Joy Behar said: "We should
be aware on a day like this that voting rights are being systematically taken away from African Americans and other people
too in this country... It's a good day to reflect on that, I think." However, Behar's comment lacked any evidence or
information to back it up. She did not voice concerns over any particular politics, bills, or anything that would
indicate anyone has lost the right to vote.
Did
ABC News Alter Texas Shooter Salvador Ramos's Photo To Appear More Caucasian? Salvador Ramos an 18-year-old
opened fire on students and faculty at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas on Tuesday, killing 19 children and 2 adults
before being killed by law enforcement. The shooter reportedly killed his own grandmother before fleeing the scene,
crashing his vehicle, and entering the school. Officers reportedly engaged the shooter, who was clad in body armor,
before he entered the school. Ramos was a student at Uvalde High School who lived in the small city 80 miles west of
San Antonio.
Media
suddenly incurious about January 6 when the narrative stops going the Democrats' way. The media and others are
in full campaign mode for 2022, and it seems the only story they focus on is January 6, where there was a protest. The
FBI said it wasn't an insurrection. Why do the media and other Democrats repeat that lie? This week, the story is
that Mark Meadows was warned by intelligence that there might be violence. That clearly means that Pelosi, Schumer,
Schiff, and others were warned yet did nothing. Yet no stories about them, and no subpoenas asking about what they knew.
[...] I watch ABC News every night, and they seem to have something on January 6 but rarely anything about the illegal
activity at the border. A border guard died last week saving someone, yet I didn't see the story. The Russian
collusion story was the greatest threat to our republic in my lifetime, yet when Durham has a new filing, most of the media
still don't cover it because that is Democrats threatening our elections.
Politico/Morning
Consult poll shows majority support for Florida sex-ed limits. So what happened in that ABC-Ipsos poll this
week? That one supposedly showed Americans in widespread opposition to the Florida legislation, but it smelled bad from
the start. ABC and Ipsos acknowledged that they had oversampled LGBTQ respondents in a 622-person sample, a very
strange outcome for a supposedly scientific poll of randomly surveyed Americans (not registered voters). As I suggested
on Monday, this looks like a cooked sample that intended to deliver an editorial narrative rather than tell the truth:
["]Are we to believe that it's a coincidence that ABC/Ipsos just so happened to oversample this community on a
polling question that directly relates to them? Especially given the smaller sample size for a national poll (622
adults, not registered voters), it would appear that the pollster focused on specific localities where one would normally
find a greater-than-usual percentage of LGBTQ respondents. If the calls were made mostly in urban areas, and perhaps
especially in urban areas known for a more robust LGBTQ culture, then it would not only explain the oversample but also the
results from non-LGBTQ-identifying adult respondents.["]
Lady
Failing at Filling Form Deemed Voter Suppression in Texas By ABC. Early voting in Texas has been going on for a
week but Monday's [2/21/2022] Good Morning America on ABC highlighted a supposed voter suppression case where they
complained it took the woman "28 days" to cast her ballot. It was the case of Pam Gaskin, the same woman CNN
highlighted last week with the same convoluted, conflicting, and now-evolving story about how Republicans were suppressing
her right to vote because she filled out the application incorrectly. "[M]ore than a dozen states across the country have
already passed laws making it tougher for people to vote. But we're getting the test of that in Texas where one voter
says it took her 28 days before she could finally cast her ballot," announced congressional correspondent Rachel Scott at
that top of the segment while failing to disclose Gaskin's history as an elections activist, which she bragged about on CNN.
Complete with emotional music in the background, Scott told the story of Gaskin and her husband (who wasn't mentioned in the CNN
report): [...]
The Editor says...
And of course the alleged victim in this case is black. The news media, as far as I know, has never pointed to an
eligible white person who was unable to vote. This says something about the news media's attitude toward blacks.
'The View' hosts'
most blatant COVID misinformation and panic moments. ABC daytime gabfest "The View" has produced plenty of
melodramatic commentary, viral moments and occasional outright misinformation on the COVID-19 pandemic. Here are 10
examples. [#1] Sunny Hostin suggests '1 percent' of youths who get COVID-19 will die: Co-host Sunny Hostin
drastically overstated the percentage of coronavirus deaths among younger people during a Tuesday [2/8/2022] discussion on
the liberal daytime talk show over the lifting of mask mandates in schools. Hostin said she didn't want her children to
be part of the "one percent" of those who get intubated and die from COVID-19, but federal health data shows the risk of
dying for those under 17 from COVID-19 is far less than that. [...] According to the CDC there have been 770 deaths
from the coronavirus in children up to age 17, through the end of January. There have been nearly 10 million known
cases of the coronavirus in the same age group, making the death rate approximately 0.008%, with countless cases unreported.
ABC
News distorts history, facts to defend Joe Biden's stalled agenda. ABC News wants you to believe a lone senator
is solely responsible for "setting back" President Joe Biden's multitrillion-dollar climate and social spending bill.
This is true so long as you ignore the other 51 lawmakers opposing the measure. "A single senator is about to seriously
set back an entire presidential agenda," ABC reported Friday in a breaking news alert. Its report, titled "Power of
one: Manchin is singularly halting Biden's agenda," reads: "In an extraordinary display of political power in the
evenly split 50-50 Senate, a single senator is about to seriously set back an entire presidential agenda."
Media
peddling a new 'climate change' lie. The lead story on ABC news on Monday November 1st was a blatant,
intentional lie spreading propaganda on climate change to mislead the public. It is tremendously sad and dangerous that
so much of what is purported to be news today is Democrat talking points used to pass their radical leftist agenda to destroy
America. [...] Most of the media and other Democrats have lied for decades about the existential threat of climate change
supposedly caused by humans and fossil fuels. Not once do we see scientific data, or facts showing a direct causal
relationship because facts don't matter, only the agenda and power. I hope enough American people wake up and do not
submit to the draconian measures being proposed which will cause the U.S. to commit economic suicide.
Critics
Accuse ABC Of Selective Editing In Obama Interview. ABC News is being accused of selective editing following
the release of an interview with former President Barack Obama. The recently aired interview on Good Morning America
shows Obama scolding Republicans over immigration reform. However, analysts quickly pointed out the news network
excluded Obama's warning about open borders. ABC ultimately conceded and included the clip online, eventually airing
it, but not until late in the night. [Tweet with video clip]
Reporters
Say Wuhan Lab Leak Theory Was Disregarded Because It Came From GOP. A number of reporters from mainstream media
outlets have recently admitted that the Wuhan "lab leak" theory was originally dismissed because it came from
Republicans. Jonathan Karl, ABC News Washington correspondent admitted to ABC's "This Week" host on Sunday [5/30/2021]
that the lab leak theory was not taken seriously because it came from the Trump administration but, "now serious people are
saying it needs a serious inquiry." "Yes, I think a lot of people have egg on their face," Karl said. "This was an
idea that was first put forward by Mike Pompeo, secretary of state, Donald Trump, and look, some things may be true even if
Donald Trump said them. Because Trump was saying so much else that was just out of control ... he said flatly this came
from that lab, and it was widely dismissed ... but now serious people are saying it needs a serious inquiry." Besides
Trump and Pompeo, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) argued that the origin of the virus should be investigated because it does
not appear to have come from the animal market, as claimed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
'There's
No Liberal Bias': Joy Behar Claims News Outlets Are 'Basically Balanced' Except For Fox And MSNBC. Joy Behar
claimed Wednesday that most news outlets — with the exceptions of Fox News and MSNBC — are "basically
balanced." Behar joined a discussion on ABC's "The View" about recent corrections on Fox News — on reports of
Vice President Kamala Harris' book being distributed at the U.S.-Mexico border and that President Joe Biden planned to limit
red meat consumption — and argued that because there were both liberals and conservatives on all of the major
outlets, they were effectively balanced.
Death of Capitol Police Officer After
Protest May Not Be as Initially Reported. The death of Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick was a tragedy.
But as it turns out, the facts originally reported about his death may not have been accurate. The initial story implied
that he died from an attack by protesters at the Capitol, it was even reported that he was hit with a fire extinguisher.
Apparently though, the facts as of this moment are not there to confirm that claim. Yet that has gone everywhere as "facts."
Indeed, according to ABC, they are reporting that Sicknick's death may have been "driven by a medical condition." [...] Now his death
may have been been related to interactions with the protesters, but we should wait until the evidence is in. People are being
whipped up based on unconfirmed or outright false reports, in a highly charged political climate. Meanwhile, folks on the
left on Twitter are spreading a video which they allege is Sicknick being beaten to death by Trump supporters, after his
family asked people not to make his passing political. It isn't him and it's not entirely clear what the video shows.
The Editor says...
[#1] Beating a cop with a fire extinguisher doesn't sound like something a Republican would do. But it does sound like
something an Antifa infiltrator would do. [#2] I'm sure the Twitter Thought Police will remove the video if it's being
used to spread misleading ideas.
ABC
Town Hall Masquerades Anti-Trump Activists as 'Uncommitted' Voters. Multiple voters characterized by ABC News
as undecided — and selected to pepper President Donald Trump with questions during a network town
hall — are longtime Trump critics. While the network claimed its Tuesday [9/15/2020] town hall "provided
uncommitted voters the opportunity to ask the president questions about issues affecting Americans," a Washington Free
Beacon review of social media posts found that two of the questioners have long denounced Trump. Kutztown
University professor Ellesia Blaque — whom ABC repeatedly identified as "uncommitted" in its coverage of the town
hall — praised vice presidential candidate Kamala Harris during the Democratic primary, saying she would "be
there, volunteering" for the California senator in Pennsylvania. The English professor was not shy about her
partisanship, calling Trump a [series of derogatory names] in a slew of 2019 tweets. She is a self-described "liberal
Democrat," according to her Facebook profile, [...]
ABC
News downplays good news in latest jobs report. The latest unemployment report issued by the government was
unexpectedly positive, but readers wouldn't know it from the tweet ABC News issued Friday morning [9/4/2020]. [Tweet]
While the tweet correctly noted the number of jobs added last month, it also said that the unemployment rate fell "slightly"
to 8.4% from July. Slightly? In July ,the government reported that the unemployment rate was 10.2%. Expectations
by economists predicted that the August rate would be in the neighborhood of 9.8% which would qualify as a slight improvement.
ABC:
Joe Biden Isn't Senile, You Guys, That's Just What The Russians Want You To Think. Has anyone noticed a
slowdown with Joe? He isn't drooling, he isn't muttering to himself any more than plenty of other people do, but
something seems different. Or maybe rather than different, something seems deeply familiar. No, it isn't the sort
of cognitive decline we've all seen with loved ones. Rather, according to ABC's latest nuke, the encroaching senility
that has our former vice president hiding in his basement is simply... Russian propaganda. Don't laugh! This is
serious stuff. National security! It took four reporters, with help from a fifth to write this story. It
runs nearly 1,600 words.
Now the riots are intensely peaceful. ABC
News mocked for claiming 'peaceful demonstration intensified,' with courthouse set ablaze, police officers targeted.
ABC News was mocked on Sunday for describing an California protest that featured demonstrators setting fire to a courthouse,
vandalizing a police station and shooting fireworks at police officers, as "peaceful." "Protesters in California set fire
to a courthouse, damaged a police station and assaulted officers after a peaceful demonstration intensified," ABC News' verified
Twitter account wrote to promote an article headlined, "Oakland protesters set fire to courthouse and vandalize." Much of
the mainstream media and the left have sought to paint sometimes violent protests across the nation as "mostly peaceful"
demonstrations in recent weeks.
After
59 Days of Riots in Portland, ABC Claims 'Weeks' Since Protests Were Violence. As NewsBusters has extensively
documented, the broadcast newscasts have done everything they could to downplay and cover-up the extreme leftist violence at
protests happening in cities across the country. But during ABC's Good Morning America on Sunday [7/26/2020],
the network, via correspondent Janai Norman, attempted some revisionist history, claiming it had been "weeks" since protests
had turned violent. Norman's lie came just as she was wrapping up her report, falsely telling viewers: "And no
one seriously injured in that shooting at that protest in Colorado. But it's been weeks we have seen protests like
these turn violent in multiple cities around the country, as we have this weekend." Not only has it not been "weeks"
since protests turned violent, but it also hasn't been "weeks" since there has been protest-linked violence in multiple
cities at the same time. While there has been violence in Portland for 59 days, last week saw riots in Seattle
targeting local businesses, which the broadcast networks (ABC, CBS, and NBC) blacked out and hid from viewers.
Trump
Was Right All Along: The Fake News Media Really Is The Enemy Of The People. Firework smoke still lingered
in the sky over Mount Rushmore as journalists began their daily routine of story-spinning, as if their very lives depended on
headlines reflecting the exact opposite of true events. President Donald Trump's pro-America speech, dripping with
unity and patriotism, was decried in legacy media as diabolical. Just moments after the star-spangled spectacle, The
New York Times blasted out a news alert, calling the president's remarks "dark and divisive" and condemning his Independence
Day speech as insufficiently focused on the Wuhan virus. ABC News claimed "Trump pushe[d] racial division" and defied
pandemic rules, while the Washington Post opted for "dark" descriptors and blamed Trump for "exploit[ing] social divisions."
One honest look at Trump's speech spikes these media fictions into orbit.
The American
Media Has Betrayed America. There aren't enough disparaging epithets in the English language to adequately
describe "journalists" such as ABC Nightly News anchorman David Muir, the dashing 40-something actor who pretends to share
important national news with America. Five days a week, Muir recites agenda-driven propaganda as if it were truth,
while his allies who run the social media monopolies throttle down, demonetize, shadowban, or flat out censor reports that
conflict with his narrative. One of Muir's biggest crimes is his façade of objectivity. Unlike the hosts of
the cable news networks, such as CNN's rabid Don Lemon, or MSNBC's smirking Rachel Maddow, Muir isn't obvious. He
spreads his phony lies and distortions with a straight face, never breaking character. If you aren't exposed to the
other side of his stories, it works.
Fake
News: In the coronavirus crisis, the press covers itself in glory. Media outlets have dished up nothing
but one-sided criticism of President Trump and have now ended up serving us just fake news. For example: In
mid-January, the experts at the WHO repeated Chinese propaganda that the virus wouldn't spread from human to human, and the
press repeated that as if it were fact. That was a lie. Instead of excoriating China for its duplicity, all they
say is that President Trump should have known. Here's another: On Jan. 31, Trump implemented a travel ban from
China. The mainstream press and its Democrat allies called that xenophobic, racist, and an overreaction. Now the
critics say he reacted too slowly. Sometimes, the press goes full fake news, based on its urge to snipe at Trump.
ABC loudly ran a false story on Wednesday [4/8/2020], with no evidence, claiming that Trump was warned in November about the
virus. On Thursday, the network started to bury it quietly.
Pentagon
issues rare public rebuke against ABC for claim White House was warned of pandemic in November. The Pentagon
issued a rare public rebuke of a report claiming it warned the White House of the coronavirus pandemic back in November.
A branch of the Pentagon's Defense Intelligence Agency debunked a claim made in a report by ABC News which alleged that "concerns
about what is now known to be the novel coronavirus pandemic were detailed in a November intelligence report." The National
Center for Medical Intelligence refuted the claim in a statement Wednesday [4/8/2020], asserting that the report does not even exist.
ABC
Chief Global Affairs Correspondent Seems Sad That Iranians Protest Against Regime. On Monday, ABC's chief
global affairs correspondent Martha Raddatz issued a report on the current protests against the Iranian despotic regime on
Monday, and while doing so, colored her language to indicate that after the U.S. killed Iranian general Qassem Soleimani, the
country was united, but now that protesters against the government have expressed their outrage, the country's "unity" has
been "shattered."
The
disastrous fires in Australia are man-caused, but they're not climate change. ABC made a laughingstock out of
itself with a map superimposing Australia across the United States, implying that an area equal to 25% of America was on
fire, even as ABC acknowledged that the fire was, in fact, only as big as Maryland. Unsurprisingly, Hollywood and the
media are wrong. Nothing unusual is happening with Australia's climate. The only unusual thing is that
environmentalists have prevented remediation and arsonists have had fun.
ABC
News posts 'blatantly incorrect' transcript of portion of Hunter Biden interview. ABC News landed that big
exclusive interview with Hunter Biden, in which Biden admitted that he had in fact spoken with his father about the job on
the Burisma board and also acknowledged that yeah, he's probably benefited quite a bit from being Joe Biden's son.
Thing is, it's not entirely clear that ABC was paying attention to the interview. As the Washington Free Beacon's Brent
Scher notes, their transcript doesn't line up with the video: [Video clip]
ABC: False Footage And
Fake News. In a stunning new low for a dominant media that has forfeited all credibility with the American
people, ABC News has been caught in the act trying to pass off video from a show at a Kentucky gun range as gripping footage
of a Turkish attack on Kurdish forces in northern Syria. [...] The video was meant to support an ongoing ABC News narrative
that President Trump has "betrayed" staunch US allies, handing them over to certain slaughter, by deciding to pull American
troops out of another potentially endless war in Syria. [...] As many news outlets have reported, the video is obviously
cropped to edit out any identifiable signs that it came from the gun show.
Trump
Smacks Down ABC News for 'Fake News' Footage of Syria. President Donald Trump rebuked ABC News' Jonathan Karl
publicly during a press conference Wednesday [10/16/2019] for the network's claim that footage from a Kentucky gun range was
in fact footage of Turkey bombing Kurds in Syria. [...] Trump was referring to a story that ABC News ran on Sunday and Monday
in which it claimed that t had obtained video footage showing the war in Syria.
Trump:
ABC News Airing Fake Syria Bombing Video is a 'Real Disgrace'. President Donald Trump on Monday evening
hammered ABC News for airing a video that purportedly showed a recent Turkish military operation against Kurdish civilians in
northern Syria, which actually appears to have been filmed at a Kentucky gun range in 2017.
ABC
News 'slaughter in Syria' footage appears to come from a Kentucky gun range. Are you distrustful of the
coverage of what is happening now in northern Syria between the Kurds and the Turkish army? You have good reason to
be. ABC aired supposedly shocking footage Monday [10/14/2019] and Sunday purporting to be from the frontline battle
between the Syrian Kurds and the invading Turks. The only problem is, the footage appears to come from a nighttime
machine gun demonstration at the Knob Creek Gun Range in West Point, Kentucky. After seeing a comment from Twitter user
Wojciech Pawelczyk, I began making some calls. As of this writing, it appears ABC indeed aired footage recorded in the
Bluegrass State and claimed it was from Syria. The network has since pulled the video.
ABC
Reports About Biden's "Overflow Crowd" of About 30 People at New Hampshire Event. About 30 supporters of Joe
Biden gathered at the Portland Pie Co. Stuffed in a small room with six tables, munching on several types of pizza,
campaign members discussed Biden's qualities with interested voters. Still the mainstream media refuse to concede that
Liberals can get people on their rally. It seems that Biden's rally in New Hampshire itself was a huge disaster.
Still ABC news wanted to report about some sort of "Overflow Crowd". ABC posted video of the "overflow crowd" at the
event — there were a few dozen people in the room and most were probably media.
Who Really Believes
Biden Can Beat Trump? According to a new Washington Post-ABC poll, however, if the 2020 election were
held today, Biden would beat President Trump by 10 points. If this inspires skepticism, it won't be ameliorated by the
finding in the same survey that Trump's approval rating is at the highest point of his presidency. The new poll found
that 47 percent of registered voters say they approve of Trump compared to 42 percent in April. Meanwhile,
Biden's lead among the contenders for the Democratic presidential nomination is dwindling.
'It's
complete fiction': US Defense Secretary Mattis says an 'exclusive' ABC News report about American plans to bomb Iran was made
up. US Defense Secretary General James Mattis has dismissed as 'fiction' an Australian media report claiming
American forces were prepared to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities as early as next month. A bewildered Mattis was quizzed
by US reporters in Washington DC on Friday [7/27/2018] about the ABC report. The 'exclusive' report quoted unnamed
senior Australian government figures and claimed Australian defence facilities would likely play a role in identifying
targets in Iran.
Fake Truth. Last week, ABC
News erroneously reported that Michael Flynn, in a supposed new role of cooperation with the prosecution, was prepared to
testify that Trump, while still a candidate, ordered him improperly to contact (and, by inference, to collude with) Russian
government officials. For a while, the startling news sent the stock market into a fall of over 300 points. Was
the purported pro-business Trump agenda shortly to be derailed by "proof" of a possible impeachable offense? A little
while later, however, ABC was forced to retract that story, to suspend Brian Ross (the reporter involved), and to offer a
correction that Trump actually had been president-elect at the time of the contact and completely within his elected purview
to reach out to foreign governments.
Brian
Ross Should Be Fired. It's a classic journalistic mistake to try and be first to report something before it's
verified. But in the Trump era, when liberals believe the president is a uniquely dangerous threat to
America — and even the world — any news that could lead to speculation about Trump's impeachment or
resignation is like catnip. Journalists are prone to overhype anything that could spell "The End." This suspension
might have been an adequate punishment ... if Ross hadn't already made a long line of whoppers.
Brian Ross's
Jackknife on the Information Superhighway. The advertised rage among executives at ABC is hard to take
seriously. Ross, after all, has long been paid by them to slap together politically useful smears. They are just
upset that he got caught on this one. Were they not in an optics war with Trump, they wouldn't have punished him at
all. To understand the hackish and biased culture at ABC from which a rodent like Ross emerged, all one has to do is
watch the hysterically jubilant treatment The View gave his "breaking news." That moment deserves a special place in the
annals of media jackassery. A producer, in mid-show, momentously brought the report out to its cackling host Joy Behar,
who read it like a telegram announcing the end of World War II. After she tremulously read the report aloud, she threw
it up in the air like confetti as the other panelists hooted with delight.
The Editor says...
ABC News is not on the Information Superhighway. ABC News is part of the old business-route highway that stops every two minutes
for advertising, and only delivers news at a pace determined by ABC News, not by you. The Information Superhighway bypasses
ABC News, for the most part, enabling you to find as much information in five minutes as ABC News dribbles out in a day.
ABC's
Brian Ross again under fire for explosive error on Trump, Flynn. ABC's famously error-prone chief investigative
correspondent, Brian Ross was at it again on Friday when the network was forced to issue an embarrassing correction when Ross
botched a bombshell "exclusive" about retired general Michael Flynn. An ABC spokesperson declined to comment on whether
Ross will be disciplined. He has not been sanctioned for past errors. Ross's report, delivered live to ABC
stations during a "special report" on Friday, said that Flynn would testify that Donald Trump had ordered him to make contact
with Russians about foreign policy while he was still a candidate — which raised the specter of impeachment and
sent the Dow careening down.
ABC News suspends Brian Ross
for 4 weeks over erroneous Flynn story. ABC News announced Saturday [12/2/2017] that it has suspended
investigative reporter Brian Ross for four weeks without pay after Ross was forced to correct a bombshell on-air report about
Michael Flynn. "We deeply regret and apologize for the serious error we made yesterday. The reporting conveyed by
Brian Ross during the special report had not been fully vetted through our editorial standards process," ABC said in a statement.
ABC News corrects bombshell
Flynn report. ABC News on Friday evening [12/1/2017] corrected an explosive special report that aired in the
morning saying that Donald Trump, as a candidate for president, had asked Michael Flynn to make contact with Russians.
During "World News Tonight," ABC News investigative reporter Brian Ross said the source who had provided the initial
information for his story later told him that it was as president-elect, not as a candidate, that Trump asked Flynn to
contact the Russians.
Flashback:
Brian Ross Had To Apologize For Report Suggesting Mass Shooter Was Tea Party Member. ABC News' Brian Ross made
a serious error in reporting on Friday [12/1/2017] when he claimed that Michael Flynn was set to testify that then-candidate
Donald Trump told him to contact Russian officials. After waiting the entire day, ABC News issued a major retraction on
the report as it was discovered that is was not in fact candidate Donald Trump who told Flynn to contact Russian
officials but president-elect Trump that instructed him to do so. ABC News significantly downplayed the serious
mistake in reporting, calling the retraction merely a "clarification."
ABC's
Brian Ross Entirely Misleads All Media on Flynn Story — ABC Desperately Backtracks. You might
remember ABC's Brian Ross for previously making the absurd on-air claim that Colorado mass shooter James Holmes was a Tea
Party member. He completely made up the story, and later apologized. Well, today [12/1/2017] ABC News Brian Ross
again appeared directly on ABC World News to break a story claiming that candidate Donald Trump told campaign adviser Michael
Flynn to make contact with Russians.
ABC
News: Christians who defend religious liberty are 'hate group'. Alliance Defending Freedom is demanding a retraction and
apology from ABC News after reporters smeared one of the nation's most respected religious liberty law firms as a 'hate group.' ABC
News reporters Pete Madden and Erin Galloway wrote a scathing report on a speech Attorney General Jeff Sessions delivered behind closed doors
at the Summit on Religious Liberty at the Ritz-Carlton in Dana Point, California.
ABC/Disney
Co. Settles $1.9 Billion BPI Defamation Lawsuit — "Pink Slime" Case. The civil trial began June 5th and ABC legal executives
must have see the writing on the wall as the initial $1.9 billion in damages could have potentially tripled under South Dakota law (treble damages) to
$5.7 billion if they allowed the three week trial to continue. The actual defamation settlement is undisclosed. However, at the point of
settlement all reasonable assumptions must be that BPI was well positioned to win far more than the initially demanded settlement amount of $1.9 billion.
ABC
Reaches Settlement in 'Pink Slime' Suit. ABC said it reached a settlement in a closely scrutinized lawsuit
filed against it by a South Dakota meat producer over ABC News reports that led to critics labeling one of the company's
products "pink slime." [...] Financial terms of the settlement could not be immediately learned.
Hardly Walt's Disney.
[Y]ou may remember a series of reports in March of 2012 that aired on ABC, "World News Tonight" about a meat company called
Beef Products Inc (BPI). The company was a vendor for restaurants such as McDonald's, Taco Bell, and Burger King.
The story prominently featured "pink slime". In fact, the reporter said, "pink slime" over 350 times during the
reporting. The reporter was referring to what the ground beef looked like during a cleaning process of the meat.
It is completely legal and sanitary. As you can imagine, the story did not look good for BPI or its customers.
Because of the stories, BPI lost customers, and revenue decreased by 80 percent. The company was also forced to
close 75 percent of their processing plants. There's only one problem. It might not have even been true.
As a result, BPI decided to take action and sue ABC and Disney for defamation. Disney countered with "freedom of the
press" and "freedom of speech" in the First Amendment. It doesn't appear be going the way Disney wants. The
lawsuit has moved forward and opening statements began this past Monday [6/12/2017] in South Dakota. The case has
the potential to be the largest defamation case in U.S. history, worth an estimated $5.7 billion.
ABC's
Photoshop Fail: Creates Fake Image to Promote Trump Interview. After being caught deceptively editing
comments from former White House press secretary Ari Fleischer during a report on Monday's [1/23/2017] Nightline, on Wednesday,
ABC News was again embroiled in a fake news controversy after the network used a badly photoshopped image to promote World News
Tonight anchor David Muir's upcoming interview with President Trump. The picture showed Trump looking out the window of
the Oval Office in a pretty standard pose, however, outside that window there appeared to be a massive blizzard. The only
problem? It hasn't snowed in Washington D.C. in weeks and certainly no storm that intense has hit the area so far this
winter. In fact, the weather on Wednesday was unseasonably warm — sunny and 60 degrees.
ABC
Apologizes After Being Caught Deceptively Editing Quote About Sean Spicer. ABC News apologized late Tuesday [1/24/2017]
after being caught deceptively editing a quote from former George W. Bush press secretary Ari Fleischer during the Monday night edition
of Nightline. ABC edited Fleischer's words to make it look like he was being more critical of White House press secretary Sean
Spicer in the taped interview than he actually was. Nightline quoted Fleischer as saying, "[Spicer's] briefing made me
uncomfortable. It was too truculent, too tough. It looks as if the ball was dropped on Saturday." But that
is not what Fleischer meant to convey at all. The point he was trying to make was actually complimentary of Spicer.
No,
The Public Doesn't Suddenly Support Socialized Medicine. A new Gallup survey seems to suggest that majority of
Americans now back government-run health care. [...] The mainstream press eagerly ran with the story. The Washington
Post, for example, headlined its piece: "Poll: Most Americans want to replace ObamaCare with single-payer —
including many Republicans." The ABC News headline blared "Poll Says Majority of Americans Prefer 'Medicare For All' Health
Care," and the story led by saying that "A growing number of Americans now support the idea of federally funded health care."
Look more carefully at the poll itself, however, and you see that it doesn't show that at all.
Report:
Caitlyn Jenner's camp pitched ESPY award in exchange for PR plugs. ESPN's annual ESPY
Awards show generally comes and goes with little controversy. Until this year, that is. [Bruce
"Caitlyn"] Jenner, the former Olympic champion decathlete, will be awarded the Arthur Ashe Courage
Award at Wednesday night's event which will be televised on ABC. Abby Wambach, a member of the U.S.
women's national soccer team that just won the World Cup, will present Jenner with the award.
According to a new report, Jenner's ESPY award originated as a pitch from her representatives to
ESPN. Per RadarOnline, Jenner's camp suggested to the network that she receive the award and
offered public relations plugs on her upcoming reality show in return.
Revealed:
Caitlyn Jenner's reps 'demanded ESPYs award in exchange for PR plugs and Diane Sawyer interview'.
Representatives of Caitlyn Jenner reportedly negotiated her ESPYs award in exchange for PR plugs in her upcoming
TV series and threatened to pull out of her 20/20 interview. Reports have emerged that Jenner's team approached
ESPN with the idea that she win the Arthur Ashe Courage Award just as details were being finalized for her 20/20 interview
with Diane Sawyer on ABC. ABC and ESPN are both owned by Disney, and ABC aired Wednesday's [7/15/2015] awards ceremony.
Weasel
words from a weasel. When [George] Stephanopoulos's contributions to the Clinton
Foundation were discovered by the Free Beacon's Andrew Stiles and leaked by Stephanopoulos, or on
his behalf by ABC public relations, to Politico, Stephanopoulos prepared a statement that amounted
to old-fashioned damage control. [...] Stephanopoulos wraps his statement in a profession of his
great generosity, of which the Clinton Foundation was coincidentally an additional beneficiary.
He made the donations over the past three years only to support worthy causes: to heal the sick,
protect the weak and feed the starving. Make room for the apostle George.
Did
Stephanopoulos go wrong? Of course he did. "[W]hen those donors give that money," ABC
host and commentator George Stephanopoulos said to Jon Stewart last month, "there's a hope that
that's going to lead to something." Stephanopoulos was impugning (or perhaps more accurately,
describing) the motives of many people who had given money to the now-very-controversial Clinton
Foundation. He failed to mention that he himself had given $75,000 — a fact he was forced
to admit last week after Andrew Stiles of the Washington Free Beacon began asking questions about it.
What
Stephanopoulos Still Hasn't Disclosed. The common denominator in what Stephanopoulos still hasn't
disclosed is the fact that Stephanopoulos didn't just give the Clinton Foundation money, he gave it his time.
Schweizer notes that time is the one thing news media personalities have very little of. In Stephanopoulos'
case there's a second thing: integrity.
George
Stephanopoulos has forfeited all trust as a newsman. Dan Rather of CBS was toppled by a phony document
scam. Lyin' Brian Williams at NBC casually mixed fact with self-aggrandizing fiction. Now George
Stephanopoulos is caught in a Clinton web of deceit at ABC. The hat trick of arrogant anchor scandals helps
explain why Americans don't trust network news. With apologies to Walter Cronkite, that's the way it is, and
the way it is stinks. Stephanopoulos shares with Rather and Williams the rotten distinction of fessing up
only after being exposed by real journalists.
ABC
Apologizes for Story That Connected Mozilla CEO to Hateful Westboro Baptist. ABC News Vice
President Jeffrey Schneider has apologized for a story on his network that connected a CEO who supports traditional
marriage to the Westboro Baptist Church and their offensive [...] signs. Mr. Schneider contacted the Media Research
Center on Thursday after our social media department requested members call and complain about the comparison.
$1.2 billion examples of ABC News' bias.
The slimiest news coverage of 2012 has nothing to do with the presidential election. It concerns a massive ABC News campaign against an American
beef company. Led by national correspondent Jim Avila, the network bombarded a South Dakota firm with a seemingly endless barrage of stories
claiming that its lean beef was — it doesn't get uglier than this — "pink slime." According to that company, ABC's reports
cost it hundreds of millions of dollars, and cost more than 700 people their jobs. Now that company is suing ABC —
for $1.2 billion.
This is what passes for journalism these days: ABC
Fakes Muslim Prejudice, Unsurprisingly Finds 'Islamophobia' in America. Apparently to prove that
the US is filled with Muslim hating yahoos, ABC went on the hunt to find "Islamophobia" in America and the
result is "Witness to Discrimination: What Would You Do?" Since they didn't really know where to
find any, ABC News decided to create their own prejudice against Muslims by hiring an actress to put on Muslim
dress and get "confronted" by a Muslim hating coffee store server — also an actor hired by ABC.
CBS
News urges you to 'combat climate change' by 'leaving the leaves' in your yard instead of raking &
sending to landfills. CBS News anchor: Leave the leaves this fall. CBS
News New York's Vanessa Murdock covers climate and explains why letting leaves lie is good for your
yard and the environment. CBS News reporter Vanessa Murdock: "According to (David
Mizejewski — naturalist, National Wildlife Federation), leaving the leaves can also help
combat climate change. it takes them out of landfills." David Mizejewski —
naturalist, National Wildlife Federation: "Underground with no oxygen, they break down and produce
methane, which is 25 times more potent as a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide is."
The Editor says...
Rotting leaves are not unique to residential yards. All the forests in the world have
leaves on the ground, and they will inevitably get wet and decay and emit byproducts into the
atmosphere. Whatever actions you take in your little fraction of an acre will have no effect
at all on the climate. You aren't going to save the earth by abstaining from raking leaves.
Trump
Sues CBS Over Edited Harris '60 Minutes' Interview. Former President Donald
Trump filed a lawsuit against CBS today, accusing the network of "election and voter interference."
"This action concerns CBS's partisan and unlawful acts of election and voter interference through
malicious, deceptive, and substantial news distortion calculated to (a) confuse, deceive, and
mislead the public, and (b) attempt to tip the scales in favor of the Democratic Party as the
heated 2024 Presidential Election — which President Trump is leading —
approaches its conclusion," wrote Trump's lawyers. The lawsuit, which was first reported by
Fox News, is over an interview Vice President Kamala Harris did with "60 Minutes." "CBS
and its 60 Minutes producers intentionally misled the public by broadcasting and posting a
carefully, deceptively edited Interview and transcript while opting to release other portions
online. Such manipulative editing aimed to confuse the electorate regarding Kamala's lack of
abilities, intelligence, and appeal," Trump's lawyers wrote. In the lawsuit, which was filed
in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Trump demands at least
$10 billion in damages and a jury trial.
Trump
sues CBS for $10B over Harris's '60 Minutes' interview. Former President Trump
is suing CBS News over a "60 Minutes" interview it broadcast with Vice President Harris
earlier this month that he and his allies have claimed was edited to cast her in a positive
light. The lawsuit, which seeks $10 billion in damages and was filed Thursday
[10/31/2024] in U.S. District Court in the Northern District of Texas alleges the network engaged
in "partisan and unlawful acts of election and voter interference through malicious, deceptive, and
substantial news distortion." "To paper over Kamala's 'word salad' weakness, CBS used its
national platform on 60 Minutes to cross the line from the exercise of judgment in reporting
to deceitful, deceptive manipulation of news," the lawsuit reads. In a statement to The Hill
late Thursday, a spokesperson for the network said the former president's "repeated claims against
60 Minutes are false."
What
Is CBS News Hiding? As we recently outlined, it has been a damaging, credibility-harming
few weeks for CBS News. The network violated its own debate rules with a disputed-to-misleading
'fact check' of JD Vance at the Vice Presidential debate, then cut off his microphone as he calmly
picked apart their assertion. Their morning show was thrown into chaos when some employees melted
down over an anchor asking pointed, tough questions of an anti-Israel zealot, resulting in angry
recriminations, tears, and a series of embarrassing leaks. Then there was the curious
60 Minutes edit of Kamala Harris' answer regarding US-Israeli relations, which looked
completely different in a teaser clip, compared to what aired on the broadcast itself.
'60 Minutes'
Has Tortured Republicans for Decades. Everyone can see the divergence between the
Harris word salad that appeared in a promo on "Face the Nation" and the shorter, more coherent
answer on their election special. But they refuse to release a transcript to explain
themselves. It's always maddening when the arrogant journalists who claim they hold
government accountable refuse to be accountable. Nobody in TV news has been more overpraised
than "60 Minutes." This horde of urbane leftist snobs has concocted syrupy minutes for
Democrats (especially Barack Obama) and salty minutes for Republicans (especially Trump). Four
years ago at this time, Lesley Stahl's interview with Trump was so hostile, the transcript is a
long list of interrupted answers. Right from the beginning, Stahl asked, "Are you ready for
some tough questions?" She asked that four times. Trump couldn't even finish sentences.
Stahl lectured him that the Hunter Biden laptop was unverified. "You know, this is
'60 Minutes.' And we can't put on things we can't verify." That needed a laugh track.
With
Kamala Harris edit, CBS has gone full 'fake news' — GOP, time to boycott.
CBS has shown its true colors. [...] For years, I've watched this network go from slanted reporting
to straight-up propaganda, and now to sheer deceit. The past month has shown that Republicans
should have nothing to do with it — and that former President Donald Trump is right to
call attention to its chicanery with a threat of legal action. [...] The final straw came Sunday,
when the network finally released a statement about its "60 Minutes" interview with Kamala
Harris, stemming from its Oct. 6 release of a teaser that showed her nonsensical answer to a
question on Israel. Social media erupted at this typical Harris word-salad
exercise — but in the actual "60 Minutes" interview that aired a day later, Harris
miraculously had a completely different answer. Did CBS perform a selective edit to do crisis
control on Harris' behalf? Instead of explaining the discrepancy, two weeks later CBS
blamed — Donald Trump. He had called the interview "deceptively edited," to which
CBS answered, "That is false." Their answer itself is a lie. The interview was edited.
A
Media Beyond Caricature. CBS's iconic 60 Minutes has had plenty of
scandals and embarrassments in its long 57-year history, most notably the fake-but-accurate Dan
Rather mess. Yet never has it found itself in greater disrepute than in 2024.
[Advertisement] Donald Trump, for good reason, recently declined to join 60 Minutes
for its traditional election-year in-depth interviews of the two presidential candidates.
Why? [The same advertisement again.] [Yet another advertisement.] Last time he consented
in 2020, anchor and interviewer Leslie Stahl attacked Trump's accurate assertion that the Hunter
Biden laptop (then in the possession of the FBI) was authentic — and authentically
damning to Joe Biden's presidential candidacy. Stahl falsely claimed the laptop "can't be
verified." She further incorrectly asserted, "So this story about Hunter and his laptop, some
repair shop found it; the source is Steve Bannon and Rudy Giuliani." The New York Post,
in fact, reported the story. The FBI did not deny it. [Advertisement] Yet old
Twitter and Facebook, under collaborating FBI tutelage and pressure, suppressed dissemination of
the truth.
Facing
FCC Investigation CBS Finally Responds to Accusations of News Manipulation. The FCC
is investigating CBS for blatant manipulation of news. CBS really has no defense. CBS
has been caught producing, via editorial manipulation, two entirely different responses to the same
question. Everyone has been asking CBS to just simply release the full transcript. CBS
has refused. The assumption is now about the manipulative content of the broadcast being so
extreme that to release a transcript would be even worse than what is already known. The FCC
complaint is simple and accurate, which is likely why CBS has never attempted to defend itself,
until today.
CBS
named in federal complaint over its decision to make Harris look coherent. CBS has
been named in a federal complaint for its decision to make Kamala Harris look coherent following
its taping of a recent interview. To do that, the network recorded an answer she made early
in the recording, then subbed it in for the word salad she actually delivered to a later
question. Fox News said the complaint accused CBS News of "significant and intentional news
distortion." The filing was from the Center for American Rights and was submitted to the
Federal Communications Commission.
Does
CBS News Even Think Before Publishing Such Patently False Drivel? How thick is the
bubble that covers liberal America? It's a legitimate question after this heinously foolish
piece about Donald Trump's proposal on car loans was announced: the former president wants to make
the interest tax-deductible. CBS News alleges that the so-called experts say such a tweak
will only benefit the rich. [...] The great thing about this story is that it's facially
untrue. The experts are wrong — they have been for quite some time —
and until they stop acting like Democratic Party operatives, ignore what they have to say.
From tax policy to COVID, the experts were wrong — the best way to give them a choleric
temper is to ignore them. Then, do it more because the rich don't take out car loans.
How
a scandal engulfing 60 Minutes exposed the Kamala media cover-up. The scandal
engulfing CBS' 60 Minutes over its edited interview with Kamala Harris has turbocharged fears
that the Democrat is being shepherded into the White House by a liberal media increasingly
desperate to cover for her shortcomings. The presidential race has been dogged by allegations
of media bias since the moment Harris unseated Joe Biden as the Democrat pick in the wake of his
disastrous debate with Donald Trump in June. Apart from glowing magazine profiles and
softball interviews with handpicked reporters, the VP has largely side-stepped the media exposure
that candidates traditionally allow.
Calls
for CBS to Release the Kamala Interview Transcript Grow Deafening As Their Reputation
Burns. We've seen so much malpractice from the corrupt media, especially since Donald
Trump descended that golden escalator in 2015, that it's hard to be surprised anymore. We've
seen them bury the Hunter Biden laptop story right before an election, we saw them prattle on for
years about a fake Russia Collusion narrative, and witnessed them lie endlessly about Joe Biden's
obvious mental decline. Still, CBS' deceptive editing of Kamala Harris' "60 Minutes"
interview marks yet another low. As we reported, they issued two separate clips showing
Kamala answering a question from interviewer Bill Whitaker — but her answer is different
in each one. Clearly, then, one of those edits is a lie. The network, which Dan Rather
already humiliated back in 2004 when he accused then-President Bush of illicitly conspiring to
avoid the Vietnam War but could only back up his claim with documents that appeared to be obvious
forgeries, is taking immense heat from all sides for their duplicitous edits. One common
refrain: come clean and release the transcripts.
'60 Minutes'
Editing Kamala Harris Is the Ultimate Deep Fake. Kamala Harris, the Democratic
nominee for president, sat down for a taped interview with CBS' Bill Whitaker for 60 Minutes
which aired Monday night. The network then released what is called "teaser" clips consisting
of elements from the interview before it aired that evening, one of which aired on CBS' "Face the
Nation." In that clip, when Whitaker asked her why Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu "isn't
listening" to the administration, Harris delivered one of her typical word salads, a nervous mashup
of words that led to no real meaning or clarity saying, "Well Bill, the work that we have done has
resulted in a number of movements in that region by Israel that were very much prompted by, or a
result of, many things, including our advocacy for what needs to happen in the region." But
apparently, the folks at CBS aren't into word salad, so they changed it. When the program
aired on Monday night, Whitaker asked the question, but this time Kamala's answer was different:
"We are not going to stop pursuing what is necessary for the United States to be clear about where
we stand on the need for this war to end." More concise, more understandable, and maybe even
presidential. But that's not the answer she gave in the earlier clip. Many have noted
that CBS replaced her gibberish with a comment given earlier in the interview. Like an
old-fashioned cut-and-paste job, but without the glue stick. Multiple outlets have reached
out to CBS asking for an explanation for the creative editing which changes the response of a
presidential candidate to a national security question.
Former
CBS staffers call for 'outside investigation' into '60 Minutes' controversy: 'There's a
problem here'. Former CBS News staffers are reportedly calling on the network to
launch an external probe into the ongoing "60 Minutes" editing controversy. CBS News has
been at the center of outrage after it aired an edited clip of Vice President Kamala Harris during
its primetime "60 Minutes" election special Monday that was different from a preview of the
unflattering exchange she had with veteran correspondent Bill Whitaker that was widely panned by
critics. "I think there should be an outside investigation," a former CBS News journalist
told The New York Post on Thursday. "Obviously, there's a problem here. If they care
about journalistic integrity, they would conduct an investigation or release the full transcript,"
the ex-CBS journalist added.
Catherine
Herridge Spills the Tea on CBS Over Kamala Interview Editing Scandal. Kamala Harris
was hoping to move the needle with her media tour. She may have moved the needle alright, but
in the wrong direction for her. She seems to be completely imploding along with her
knuckle-headed running mate, Tim Walz. Interviews with friendly outlets are supposed to help
prop you up. But her interview with "The View" just decimated her and her interview with
"60 Minutes" has evolved into a full-blown scandal. Bill Whitaker actually did a good
job of asking some probing questions, and Kamala gave some ridiculous answers, including one
incredible word salad about Israel and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. They released a
clip on it early, but then when they did the whole interview on Monday, the answer had changed and
been edited. [Tweet]
CBS
Embroiled in 'Huge Journalistic Scandal' After Major Change to Kamala Harris' '60 Minutes'
Answer Is Spotted. Every honest American knows that the establishment media lies on
behalf of powerful people. Thus, when we point out instances of dishonesty, it often feels as
if we do little more than multiply examples. Sometimes, however, those examples prove so
egregious that, no matter how familiar they seem, and no matter how exhausted the years of similar
and repeated outrages have made us feel, their sheer brazenness still manages to shock us.
Tuesday on the social media platform X, an observant video editor named "MAZE" noticed that someone
at CBS News appeared to have removed one of Vice President Kamala Harris' most jaw-droppingly
incoherent answers from her recent "60 Minutes" interview then replaced it with an altogether
different answer — an apparent cut-and-paste editing job that one X user described as "a
huge journalistic scandal."
Trump
cries foul over 60 Minutes edit of Kamala sit down: 'Must be investigated'.
Former President Trump cried foul and demanded an investigation following accusations that
"60 Minutes" allegedly edited an answer from Vice President Kamala Harris given during another
softball, propagandic interview. Harris spoke with "60 Minutes" correspondent Bill
Whitaker during a pre-taped session in what CBS News has referred to as a traditional interview
with presidential candidates. It would seem that the traditional interview referred to
included selective editing that was meant to put Harris in a more favorable political light.
That's hardly objective journalism. The propaganda piece aired on Monday. Trump claims
he never agreed to an interview on the show and was bashed by host Scott Pelley for it who claimed
he backed out of the sitdown. Trump hammered the producers of the program and accused them of
being guilty of a "major Campaign Finance Violation."
Trump
Demands Investigation After 60 Minutes Edits Out Kamala's Word Salad Answers.
Former President Donald Trump on Tuesday demanded an investigation into the 60 Minutes
interview of Kamala Harris, insisting that the long running news program repeatedly "sliced and
diced" her answers to make her seem "more presidential." [Advertisement] The Trump-Vance
Campaign on Monday demanded that CBS News release an "unedited transcript" of the entire "60
Minutes" interview after her particularly bad "word salad" answer about Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu was cut from Monday's broadcast and replaced with a completely different answer.
[The same advertisement again] [Unrelated video clip] In a preview clip on Sunday,
"60 Minutes" correspondent Bill Whitaker told Harris that "it seems that Prime Minister
Netanyahu is not listening." The Democrat presidential nominee answered, "Well, Bill ... the
work that we have done has resulted in a number of movements in that region by Israel that were
very much prompted by or a result of many things, including our advocacy for what needs to happen
in the region." [Advertisement] That incoherent word salad was one of several botched
answers that went viral on social media following the trainwreck interview.
Fake
News '60 Minutes' Caught Editing Kamala's Nonsensical Answer with Previous Soundbite to Make
Her Sound Coherent and Normal. This is the definition of election interference.
Apparently, Kamala's interview with 60 Minutes was much worse than we first thought.
Fake news 60 Minutes was caught editing Kamala's answers to make her sound coherent and
normal. In fact it was so bad that '60 Minutes' spliced her nonsensical answer and
replaced it with a completely separate sentence she said earlier in the interview. [...] Mixing and
matching questions and answers. This isn't journalism. It's fraud.
60 Minutes
Edits Kamala Harris Interview to Remove Her Jibberish and Completely Change Answers to
Questions. I was initially wondering why it took CBS 60-Minutes over 36 hours to
upload the full interview to their YouTube account. Now things make sense. CBS
60-Minutes not only edited the interview, but they also completely erased parts of the interview
and structurally moved answers to questions in an intentional effort to assist the Harris
campaign. In essence, CBS completely changed the interview. CBS didn't just shape or
modify the interview; they literally moved answers to questions. A Twitter user named
@Mazemore was the first to notice one big substantial edit that completely manufacturers a
different question and answer. "The edited version that CBS put on YouTube is a work of art.
Mix and match questions and answers." This is unreal journalistic manipulation.
CBS
News' Fake Kamala Interview Is Deliberate Disinformation Meant To Sway Voters. On
Sunday, CBS News aired a clip of Vice President Kamala Harris stumbling through an answer to Bill
Whitaker about why some foreign leaders disregard the Biden-Harris administration. "We supply
Israel with billions of dollars in military aid and yet Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu seems to
be charting his own course," Whitaker said. "The Biden-Harris administration has pressed him to
agree to a ceasefire; he's resisted. You urged him not to go into Lebanon; he went in
anyway. He has promised to make Iran pay for the missile attack, and that has the potential
of expanding the war. Does the U.S. have no sway over Prime Minister Netanyahu?" It was one
of the more difficult questions Harris has had to face over the past several weeks, answering for
why her administration is seen as weak and ineffective on the world stage. When Whitaker
doubled down on his question after Harris tried to avoid it with her initial answer, as expected,
Harris tossed up a word salad. "Well, Bill, the work that we have done has resulted in a number
of movements in that region by Israel that were very much prompted by, or a result of, many things,
including our advocacy for what needs to happen in the region." Harris said during the version
that appeared on Sunday's "Face the Nation." Roughly 24 hours later, CBS News aired a
different version of Harris' answer.
The Editor says...
Maybe the managers at CBS think the viewers are really stupid. Maybe they think "60 Minutes"
viewers only watch TV on Sundays. Maybe they think the internet hasn't been invented yet.
Maybe they are all rabid socialist Democrats who just don't care what viewers catch them doing.
What could possibly lead them to believe that nobody would notice a stealth edit on a Harris interview,
just one month before the election?
Were
the CBS Moderators Instructed to Affirm Climate Alarmist Talking Points?
[Scroll down] The moderators, or CBS, immediately showed their bias. After an
opening question about Israel and Iran, a perfectly logical lead-in topic as missiles were
literally raining down on Israel as the debate got underway, climate change was the second question
offered, before the economy and illegal immigration, despite it ranking dead last or near the
bottom in polls of voters as an issue of concern. Climate change ranks far below inflation,
health care, education, crime, and illegal immigration in every poll taken. But because it is
a liberal cause célèbre, it matters more to the left-leaning media than issues more
important to voters. Thus, its prominence in CBS' moderators questioning and their behavior
after. In the wake of Hurricane Helene, O'Donnell framed a question about climate change by
asserting that climate change makes hurricanes "larger, stronger, and more deadly because of the
historic rainfall." The data demonstrate that this is false, of course, but her handlers felt
the need to make sure she used the tragedy to apply pressure on the Republican vice presidential
candidate and emotionally charge the question.
'Fact
check' has become just another word for censorship. At the vice presidential debate
this week, the CBS moderators once again tried to show that they were the fair and impartial people
in the room[.] Except that — as with the Trump-Harris debate — they only
seemed interested in fact-checking in one direction. Against the Republican. On Tuesday
night the subject of Springfield, Ohio, once again came up. And once again Springfield
revealed one of the big problems of this media era. CBS's Margaret Brennan decided to fact
check something that JD Vance said and immediately relayed a piece of false information
herself. Following Vance's point about the number of illegal migrants Brennan announced
authoritatively that Springfield does in fact have "a large number of Haitian migrants" but that
they have "legal status [and] Temporary Protected Status." It was then down to Vance to
fact-check the fact-checker by pointing out — correctly — that what Brennan
had just described was actually a "pathway" opened up by Kamala Harris explicitly to fudge the true
levels of illegal immigration.
Walz
'Misspeaks': How the Media Are Framing the Governor's Lies. On Tuesday, Gov. Tim
Walz (D-MN) and Sen. JD Vance (R-OH) faced off for the vice presidential debate on CBS
News. Walz was reportedly feeling nervous ahead of time, and it certainly showed.
Arguably his worst moment was when he was confronted by co-moderator Margaret Brennan for lying
about being in Hong Kong for the Tiananmen Square massacre in 1989. It's just one of many examples
from the pathological liar, and Walz had to know it was coming. He still seriously flubbed
his response, and yet the media keep covering for him.
If
Bias Were an Olympic Sport, CBS Would Win Gold. In a recent vice presidential debate,
CBS News anchors Norah O'Donnell and Margaret Brennan faced harsh criticism from political
commentators for their apparent bias against Senator JD Vance (R-OH). Former President Donald
Trump took to Truth Social, expressing his discontent with the moderation. "Margaret Brennan
just lied again about the ILLEGAL MIGRANTS let into our Country by Lyin' Kamala Harris, and then
she cut off JD's mic to stop him from correcting her!" he stated. [Tweet] As reported by
Breitbart, observers noted that the moderators frequently interrupted Vance, while the same
scrutiny did not seem to apply to his opponent, Governor Tim Walz (D). Critics argue that the
questions posed to Vance were framed in a way that undermined his responses, reflecting a clear
disparity in the treatment of the two candidates. [Video clip]
Ridiculous
'fact check' of a true statement during CBS debate. Sen. JD Vance was
accurately describing the migrant crisis fueled by Kamala Harris and Joe Biden when CBS moderator
Margaret Brennan decided to insert herself with a "fact check." "Just to clarify for our
viewers, Springfield, Ohio does have a large number of Haitian migrants who have legal status," she
said smugly. Vance was rightly annoyed by the interruption and said, "The rules were that you
guys weren't going to fact-check, and since you're fact-checking me, I think it's important to say
what's actually going on." He then proceeded to truthfully, forcefully explain what "legal
status" means: [...]
Kamala
Eliminating Taxes on Tips is Good, Trump Eliminating Them is Bad, According to CBS.
In the wake of Kamala Harris copying Donald Trump's plan to eliminate taxes on tips for service and
hospitality workers, mainstream media outlet CBS demonstrated obvious bias in its coverage of the
two candidates. For Harris, CBS' X description was: "Vice President Kamala Harris is rolling
out a new policy position, saying she'll fight to end taxes on tips for service and hospitality
workers." For Trump, CBS' X description was: "Former President Donald Trump's vow to stop
taxing tips would cost the federal government up to $250 billion over ten years, according to
nonpartisan watchdog group." Author Tim Murtaugh shared the side-by-side on X, joking that
"Only sharp-eyed readers will be able to spot the difference in the coverage of the two proposals."
The
Press Rush to Put Lipstick on the Pig, but the Tim Walz Pick Is a Disaster for Democrats.
Who is Walz? He's a Bernie Sanders clone whose record is so left-wing that Trump could run a new
ad every single day from now until the election. That didn't stop the press from quickly trying to
put lipstick on the pig, though. In the aftermath of the news, CBS News described him as a "centrist"
who likes to cook casseroles. [Tweet with video clip]
CBS
Implies Kamala Harris Should Be Exempt From Criticism. The bitter Sunday afternoon
announcement that President Joe Biden would end his reelection bid spurred hours of live network
television coverage. [...] The news wasn't two hours old before Robert Costa warned the Republican
attacks were going to be "rough and tumble like we've never seen it." He received a text from
Donald Trump Jr. "already attacking Vice President Harris, saying she owns the entire policy of
President Biden, even more liberal, and he's saying she's not competent!" Stop. What in
that statement is rougher than we've ever seen? The Democrats and their staunch media allies
compare Donald Trump to Hitler and other mass-murdering dictators. They explicitly call him
an "existential threat" to democracy. How is it then "rough" to say Harris is ultraliberal
and incompetent?
Real-Time
History Rewrite: CBS Casts Biden as LBJ. The first draft of history,
specifically, President Joe Biden's decision to withdraw from his campaign to seek reelection, is
being rewritten in real time. In addition to being likened to Washington and Cincinnatus,
Biden is now drawing media comparisons to Lyndon Baines Johnson. [...] We were told that Biden is
stepping down due to bad polling, proof evident that he had no path to victory in 2024. But now we
are getting a sliver of an admission that health was always a concern. The media are slowly
circling back to what everyone else already knew to be true. Of course, the big rewrite of
history here is that Biden is somehow walking away from a second term in a patriotic exercise.
This isn't the case, either. The truth is that Biden was pushed out of the race by his own party
due to the aforementioned bad polling after the disastrous June 20th debate, which exposed the
cognitive decline that people talked about for so long but never drew coverage in the media.
CBS
News ousts top exec accused of blocking correspondent's Hunter Biden laptop coverage.
CBS News president Ingrid Ciprian-Matthews — who was accused of sidelining white
journalists and blocking an acclaimed correspondent's reporting on the Hunter Biden
laptop — is stepping down at the network, the company said Wednesday [7/10/2024].
The controversial news boss, who was named president just last August, is exiting after she made
headlines in February over the firing of Catherine Herridge, a respected senior investigative
reporter who had been doggedly covering the Hunter Biden laptop story for the network. At the
time, media insiders speculated that Herridge's exit was linked to her reporting that President
Biden may have kept evidence that he had foreign business dealings while in office.
Poll:
62% of registered voters support the deportation of all illegal immigrants. CBS News
host Margaret Brennan expressed bewilderment at the findings of a recent poll indicating majority
support for deporting all illegal immigrants. "Homeland Security says that President Biden has
already deported or repatriated more people in the past year than any year since 2010. And
then, depending on the details of what's talked about on the campaign trail, some of what
Mr. Trump talks about could be illegal," Brennan observed. Continuing her analysis, she
remarked, "It doesn't seem practical, in some sense, to round up children. And then we know
that the courts have questioned whether local authorities would have the ability to do it, and
federal authorities don't have the resources. So what exactly do people think they're supporting?"
The Editor says...
Deporting all illegal aliens is not infeasible. They will deport themselves, or at least line up
at the deportation office, if all welfare benefits are cut off, all Spanish-language broadcasting is
turned off, and a few of their employers are threatened with legal action. Conduct all public
business exclusively in English. Make the foreigners encounter friction wherever they go,
and they'll leave. Nobody is clamoring for more illegal aliens. Even the people in
"sanctuary cities" are sick of them.
'60 Minutes'
Gets Caught Red-Handed After Interview With 'Misinformation Expert'. Leave it to
"60 Minutes" to bring on the leader of a "misinformation research group" and then fail to
disclose all the pertinent details of her background. The left-wing news program was caught
red-handed when it was revealed that Kate Starbird isn't actually an unbiased arbiter of truth and
fiction. The background of this story involves the following interview, in which Starbird and
"60 Minutes'" Lesley Stahl complain that X (formerly Twitter) wasn't at their beck and call to
censor content they deem to be "misinformation." [Tweet with video clip] What is
with left-wing operatives and taking their style cues from Rachel Maddow? All that's missing
is a streak of purple in her hair. Regardless, on the merits, what Starbird says is derived
from either dishonesty or stupidity.
CBS shows that its goal is to support the Socialist Democrats, not report the truth. CBS
Fears Supporting Israel/Opposing Hamas Will Cost Biden Muslim Vote. On Monday, CBS
Mornings joined ABC and NBC with a hair-on-fire warning for President Biden that if he
continued to support Israel and oppose Hamas, he risked losing the Muslim vote and possibly losing
the 2024 election. Of course, the source of CBS's moral cowardice in standing up to the
terrorist organization was the fear that Democrats could lose the key state of Michigan and former
President Trump could become president again. Co-anchor Tony Dokoupil kicked off the
network's kvetching by warning that "The latest CBS News poll, in fact, finds most Americans do not
approve of President Biden's handling of the conflict" and "that could make a big difference in
Michigan, the swing state where some 200,000 Muslim-Americans live."
Phrases that aren't that great: Phrases
that grate. Indeed, crazed leftists seek to control the debate with deception and
manipulation. Their linguistic lunacy is promulgated from legacy media in an attempt to
control the masses. CBS Mornings host Gayle King, for example, endeavors to foist upon
hapless viewers the term "truthism" as a substitute for "wokeism."
Joe
Biden's 60 Minute Interview on Gaza Is the Saddest Media Display I Have Ever
Witnessed. I know many readers here will not like the thought of watching pudding
brain mutter his way through a carefully edited and controlled interview by a corporate outlet
intent on presenting Biden in the best possible light. However, you only really need to watch
the introduction by CBS host, Scott Pelley. Never before have I seen a more transparently
pathetic political defense presented as the introduction to an interview of a U.S. president.
Pelley was apologetic toward Biden in the extreme, leading the viewer into an interview with
prescripted justification and excuses for the content that would follow. Watching Pelley set
up this interview elicits a sense of embarrassment that such a set-up is needed. When he gets
into the interview, Pelley actually constructs the talking points for Biden, with explanations and
outlines that provide simple yes/no answers from Biden. This interview is so soft, it becomes
pathetic to watch: [Video clip]
'60
Minutes' Escorts Fumbling Biden, Slams Danger of 'Hard-Right Republicans'. Once
again, former CBS Evening News anchor Scott Pelley politely offered President Joe Biden a helpful
platform to pretend he's taking the tough questions. A year ago, Pelley promoted Biden on
more domestic concerns, while this was entirely about the Israel-Hamas war. The worst
question was Pelley suggesting "hard-right Republicans" are making the world more dangerous with
their failure to elect a new Speaker. [Tweet with video clip] [...] Some thought the
president looked doddering — and the interview was carefully edited by his CBS
friends. Pelley admitted Biden was, well, "tired" from running the country. [Tweet with video clip]
The Editor says...
Joe Biden does not run this country. He doesn't even manage his own daily schedule. I doubt if
he is capable of dressing himself. So, he's not tired from running the country, or maintaining world
peace, or halting the rising sea levels. He's tired because he's a very decrepit and feeble old man
who should have retired several years ago.
CBS
'News' [is being Criticized] For Downplaying Massacre Of Israeli Civilians. CBS News
took a wave of backlash on Thursday after publishing an X post that appeared to downplay the
horrific terror attacks Hamas perpetrated against Israeli civilians, leaving over 1,300 dead and
thousands more wounded. The post in question referenced the incredible survival story of
10-month-old twins whose parents hid them just before the Hamas terrorists arrived at Kfar Aza
kibbutz, killing the parents and numerous others — including children and babies.
But what people took issue with was not the story itself — rather, it was the use of
scare quotes around the word massacre: "10-month-old Israeli twins were found hidden and unharmed
at kibbutz where Hamas 'massacred' their parents and beheaded children." [Tweet]
CBS's
Gayle King suggests high gas prices come from 'extreme heat,' makes no mention of Biden policies.
CBS News' Gayle King told the channel's audience that one of the reasons gas prices have been going
up is a result of "extreme heat." President Joe Biden's policies were not mentioned as a factor.
The CBS Mornings segment aired on Friday morning and King claimed that the rise in gas prices
has been due to the heat of the summer. She did not mention any economic policy.
Ted
Cruz Advisor Has Great Question About That Ray Epps Interview. Why is the FBI only
answering "60 Minutes" now? This failure also excited more comments from people about Epps'
status, because once again, as with so many other things, the FBI refused to be straight -forward
on the matter. These are the same folks who now have reportedly been looking to develop
sources within Catholic Churches to fink on their fellow congregants. Now, I'm not saying
that Epps is a "fed." However, it isn't hard to see that there is a fundamental difference between
a statement to Congress and one to "60 Minutes," as some noted. [Tweet] But even if you're
not under oath, it's still a potential crime to intentionally say something false to Congress.
The FBI statement was also terse to say the least, only covering the FBI being a source or
employee. It doesn't deny other agencies. While the FBI is now disavowing Epps in a
statement, not under oath or to Congress, there have been other reports about informants,
including about one high up in the Oathkeepers who was allegedly secretly reporting about the
group's activities in the lead-up to Jan. 6.
60
Minutes Basically Screams, 'Leave Ray Epps Alone!' [Scroll down] All
anyone has to do is compare Epps' story with that of Jacob Chansley, aka the "QAnon Shaman," to see
how ridiculous Epps' claims of targeting and persecution are. How many of the J6 prisoners
had a five-acre ranch to sell so that they could go into hiding? How many of them have been
invited onto 60 Minutes and agreed to an interview? Inquiring minds want to know. Yet,
CBS went there anyway, because the January 6 narrative of the evil Donald Trump/MAGA attempt
to "overthrow democracy" must be kept alive. [...] Once again, if for no other reason other than
being curious journalists, why hasn't CBS or 60 Minutes interviewed any J6 prisoners and attempted
to cover their stories? Most of these men and women did not have the luxury of being able to
go into hiding. Many were SWATTED, arrested, and have been languishing in gulags for going on
three years now.
'60
Minutes' Portrays Ray Epps as a Victim as He Provides the Sob Story. Ray Epps sat for
a '60 Minutes' interview that aired Sunday night, and it didn't sit well with Republicans.
The show portrayed Epps as a victim who only stood out because he's 6'4". The host claimed the
actions of Ray Epps were only a "conspiracy' theory." The 6'4" victim blames Fox News and
well-known conservatives for casting him as an organizer of January 6th. His actions
were miniaturized. However, Epps took credit for orchestrating the riot! No one
hatched that in some wild conspiracy. '60 Minutes' asks Ray Epps about texting a
relative, "I orchestrated it," after leaving Jan. 6 Capitol riot, "I was boasting to my
nephew. [...] I shouldn't have used that word," Epps said.
60
Minutes Steps Up to Defend Ray Epps, Who Is Absolutely Not a Fed, Oh No. The media
love affair with the most suspicious person involved with the Left's Jan. 6 hoax, Ray Epps,
continues. On Sunday evening, 60 Minutes is planning to air a profile of Epps, a man
whom they claim has been unjustly vilified in the conservative media. In doing so, they're
just calling new attention to the gaping holes in their Jan. 6 propaganda narrative. The
Leftist political and media elites have been insisting ever since Jan. 6, 2021, that the
disturbance at the Capitol on that day constituted an "insurrection," an actual attempt to
overthrow the government of the United States and, presumably, to install Donald Trump as a
dictator. Over the intervening two years, the Left's case has steadily unraveled, and one of
the most glaring examples of its weakness has been the curious case of Epps. Amid all the
hysteria about "MAGA Republicans" supposedly determining to storm the Capitol and overthrow the
government, Epps is the only person who was captured on video actually exhorting people to enter
the building. Yet instead of being arrested, Epps has become a media darling.
Suspicious? In the extreme.
Ray
Epps Is Going on '60 Minutes,' and the Gaslighting Has Already Started. Ray Epps, who
I'm assured just wants to be left alone to live in peace and harmony, is doing what all people who
want to be left alone do: He's going on 60 Minutes to get backslaps from the press. The
left-wing CBS News show, which has been caught in numerous journalistic scandals over the last
several years, began plugging the interview on Friday. It will air Sunday evening, but the
gaslighting has already started.
Michelle
Obama is not a fan of the Second Amendment and says Obama administration was scandal-free.
Michelle Obama has a short memory. Or, at the least, a selective memory. She was interviewed
by her real-life friend CBS morning show host Gayle King (Oprah's BFF) Thursday. The soft interview
was to promote Michelle's latest projects which include a Netflix special based on her most recent book,
"The Light We Carry." She told Gayle King that "unfettered" access to guns is a bad thing.
And she said that there were no scandals in the Obama administration. That level of gaslighting
is what we've come to expect from Obama fans and King is in that camp. How nice that she allows
her friend to re-write history and doesn't bother to challenge her narrative.
CBS
News Bans Reporters From Using the Word 'Transgender' To Describe Transgender Nashville
Shooter. The tragic shootings in Tennessee this week have unsurprisingly brought out
the worst in progressive media. Although three of the victims were children, a fact that
should dominate the coverage of such a terrible crime, mainstream outlets have spent an inordinate
amount of time lamenting the "increased danger" to transgender people after learning the shooter
identified as transgender. Now comes word that one outlet actually went so far as to ban
reporters from using the term "transgender" to describe the transgender shooter. In an
exclusive report on Thursday, The New York Post revealed CBS News executives sent out a memo
demanding staff purposefully ignore the shooter's gender identity, even though police indicated her
transgender identity was most likely a motivating factor in the shooting spree.
60
Minutes Attempts to Walk Back Doubts Over Covid Lab Leak Theory. The
long-established, once viewed as credible journalism CBS News program, 60 Minutes, attempted to
clear the air about the origins of COVID-19 after a year of declaring the lab-leak theory
"debunked." After FBI Director Christopher Wray agreed with the bombshell report by the
Washington Street Journal, revealing that the United States Department of Energy concluded that
COVID "most likely arose from a laboratory leak," 60 Minutes is walking back their previous
comments about the matter. In May 2020, CBS News's Scott Pelley cast significant doubt over
the Trump Administration's assertions that the virus was leaked from a lab in Wuhan, China saying,
"both the White House and the Chinese Communist Party have been less than honest."
Those
Abandoning Blue States Should Abandon Democrats, Too. A recent New York Post article declared that, in a
"staggering exodus," in 2022, more residents of New York moved to Florida "than any other year in history." [...] In
what is almost certainly an effort to cover for Democrats, CBS News practically ignores the politics of the Blue State
Exodus and benignly points to "more affordable housing and plentiful jobs" in red states as the main reasons for
citizens fleeing Democrat-dominated states. CBS News brushes off the idea that higher taxes in blue states are
contributing to this mass exodus, and it fails to mention at all crime, COVID-lockdown policies, and the like as reasons
for the growing number of "leftugees." Much, and likely the vast majority, of the population loss in blue states
is due to those fleeing even higher-taxed and more crime-ridden large U.S. cities.
The leftist media's reliance on liars and frauds.
This past weekend's "60 Minutes," the once highly respected and popular CBS newsmagazine, decided to do a scare piece on
climate change. The premise: Earth is headed toward a "sixth mass extinction" if we don't embrace a zero-emissions
stance and reject our capitalist society. To back up these outlandish claims, CBS correspondent Scott Pelley
interviewed the discredited biologist Paul Ehrlich, who has predicted about 20 extinctions over the past 60 years,
not one of which came to pass. In 1968, Mr. Ehrlich warned in his book "The Population Bomb" that "the
battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970s, hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite
of any crash programs embarked upon now." He added that oceans would be without life by 1979, and by 1999 the U.S.
population would plummet to 23 million because of the use of pesticides. "The death rate will increase until at
least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next ten years," he predicted in an
interview with Mademoiselle in 1970. Mr. Ehrlich, of course, was fantastically wrong.
RIP: CBS News (1927-2022).
The decline and fall of CBS News has been something to watch in recent years. The network was founded in 1927, and
just recently passed away from pure stupidity. [Tweet] The exact cause of the illness that finally brought
down CBS News was the Hunter Biden laptop story. Here's CBS News in 2020 telling its audience that the contents of
Hunter Biden's laptop isn't real — it's disinformation. [Tweet] The 60 Minutes
anchor Lesley Stahl was briefly released from the Dan Rather Rest Home for Disgraced Journalists to interview President
Trump in the run-up to the 2020 election. Stahl spent her time during the interview gaslighting the American
public about the laptop. (She also insisted that the Obama administration did not spy on the Trump campaign.)
[...] It was an open secret at the time why CBS News — and the rest of the major corporate media
outlets — tried to discredit the Hunter Biden laptop story. It was well known that Obama/Biden
political operatives had warned the big media outlets that anyone who reported the truth about Hunter Biden's laptop
would be frozen out by the Biden Administration (if he won). In other words, CBS News protected the
Bidens — and sold out its remaining viewers. Two years later — and two years too
late — the network has now changed its tune because it doesn't matter anymore.
60
Minutes' Scott Pelley Gets an 'F' for His Joe Biden Interview. Until last weekend, President Joe Biden
hadn't given an interview to an American news network in seven months, or some 223 days. Think about
that. We literally have a United States president who is not answerable to the public, and who spends his days
hiding behind his handlers, Teleprompters, cheat sheets, and wife Jill. He did finally deign to appear on CBS News
60 Minutes on Sunday, and he dropped enough news to keep RedState reporters working overtime. Yours
truly reported how Biden warned Putin not to use nukes in the Ukraine war; streiff reported how the president pledged to
defend Taiwan even though that is not the official U.S. position; Nick Arama told us how Joe bragged that he'd been busy
depleting the Strategic Petroleum Reserve and then dismissed any concerns about the business dealings of his troubled
son Hunter; Bonchie wrote about Joe's brushing off skyrocketing inflation before he suddenly declared that COVID is
over... Phew. The list goes on. [Tweet with video clip]
CBS
Economic Gaslighting Example, Face the Nation Pretends Not to Know Joe Biden Energy Policy Driving Higher
Prices. "Gaslighting" is essentially a term used to describe an abuser continually lying to victim in
order to make the victim misbelieve reality. Economic "gaslighting" is a process of lying about the nature of true
cause in order to continue advancing the abusive policy. Combine the economic gaslighting with the historic
leftist approach of pretending not to know things, and you get this dynamic on CBS Face the Nation today. In this
brief segment describing inflation, we see all the classic strategies deployed by ideological media. First, notice
they blame: (1) the pandemic recovery, (2) consumer demand, (3) Ukraine, and (4) a supply
chain 'muddle'. Not only are these issues ridiculous, but none of them are the cause of supply side inflation.
Blaming "consumer demand," which has transparently collapsed for the last year, is beyond nonsense. Watch, and also
pay attention to the graphics they use to manipulate the audience: [Video clip]
Scientists
warn South Florida coastal cities will be affected by sea level rise. Sea level rise is increasing at a
dramatic rate. Scientists at the University of Miami warn that if we don't act soon, coastal cities and towns will
slowly diminish. Scientists say a few decades from now, downtown Miami will be underwater. ["]The tide is
coming in and eventually it's not going to go back out," says Dr. Harold Wanless, a Geologist and Professor of
Geography and Sustainable Development at University of Miami[.] "Climate change is real. This isn't something
that might happen," he says. "The problem is, sea level is rising at an accelerating rate now because of ice melting in
Greenland and Antarctica. So for now what is just a high tide — a rare high tide... is going to become
a frequent high tide," he says. So what does that mean for us? According to Dr. Wanelss's research, by
the year 2060, nearly 60% of Miami-Dade county will be underwater. "Now since the ice melt started we're up to a rate
of almost two feet per century," he says.
The Editor says...
[#1] There is no unusual "ice melt" occurring in Antarctica or Greenland that would cause the world-wide sea level to increase
by a foot or more. [#2] All of New Orleans is below sea level. Somehow they deal with it. How much of the
city of New Orleans is flooded today? [#3] The professor at the center of this news report will be retired and most
likely deceased bu 2060, so he will be immune to criticism when his prediction falls flat.
CBS
Caught Scripting Fake News, Narrative Engineer Norah O'Donnell. CBS narrative engineer Norah O'Donnell made the
rounds today proclaiming the DOJ did not seize President Trump's passports. At least that was the carefully constructed
narrative within her messaging.
DOJ
admits Trump passports were taken after CBS anchor O'Donnell reports not. The Justice Department admitted late
Monday [8/15/2022] that former President Donald Trump's passports were taken by FBI agents who searched his Florida home last
week — hours after "CBS Evening News" anchor Norah O'Donnell tweeted that she had been told otherwise. Late
Monday, Trump spokesman Taylor Budowich tweeted a screenshot of an email from a member of the Justice Department's National
Security Division that acknowledged the bureau removed the 45th president's travel documents from Mar-a-Lago. "We have
learned that the filter agents seized three passports belonging to President Trump, two expired and one being his active
diplomatic passport," the email said.
Trump
Team Drops Email Proving FBI Wrongly Seized Passports After Media, DOJ Attempted to Mislead Public with Spin.
Donald Trump's legal team demolished the Department of Justice's (DOJ) media spin that denied having the former president's
passports in their possession following the FBI's raid on Mar-a-Lago last week. On Monday, former President Trump
claimed on his social media site TruthSocial that the FBI "stole" his passports during the raid that shook the political
world last week. [...] "According to a DOJ official, the FBI is NOT in possession of former President Trump's
passports. Trump had accused the FBI of stealing his three passports during the search of his Mar-a-Lago home,"
O'Donnell announced on Monday. [Tweet] Shortly after Norah's post, Taylor Budowich, the former president's
communications director, shared an email from Jay Bratt, the top counterintelligence official in the Justice Department's
national security division, confirming that three passports were seized in the raid and that they would be returned to the
former president soon.
Trump
Team Publishes Alleged DOJ Email Refuting Claim That FBI Didn't Take Passports. A spokesperson for former
President Donald Trump published an alleged email from a top DOJ email stating that the president's passports were
accidentally taken during the raid on his home last week. "In the raid by the FBI of Mar-a-Lago, they stole my three
Passports (one expired), along with everything else," Trump wrote on social media. CBS News anchor Norah O'Donnell
later tweeted that "[a]ccording to a DOJ official, the FBI is NOT in possession of former President Trump's passports."
A spokesperson for Trump later responded directly to her tweet by posting a screenshot of an alleged email from Justice
Department counterintelligence chief Jay Bratt that stated that the passports were being returned.
Trump
Accused of Lying Over FBI-Seized Passports, Then He Dropped the Receipts. As RedState reported on Monday,
Donald Trump accused the FBI of taking his passports during the unprecedented raid of his Florida residence. According
to the former president, three passports were taken during the search, which apparently went far beyond just recovering
supposedly classified documents that threatened "national security." Predictably, after Trump made the claim, the press
quickly jumped into the fray to call him a liar. Norah O'Donnell of CBS News claimed via a source that the FBI was "not
in possession of former President Trump's passports." [Tweet] "Not in possession of" is very specific wording that
could have simply meant the FBI had passed them on to another agency. Why not just say "we didn't take the passports"
if they didn't take the passports? Well, as it turns out, Trump's team was ready and waiting with the receipts that
showed the press narrative was a falsehood. [Tweet]
'60 Minutes'
Enables FBI Dysfunction. Scott Pelley of "60 Minutes" didn't tell his viewers whether FBI Director Christopher
Wray imposed conditions before agreeing to be interviewed on camera by CBS. But his slobbering pro-FBI questions, which
aired Sunday, had the feel of something Wray's communication director may have fed the "news" program. [...] Under Wray, the
FBI has disgraced itself with misconduct and abuse of power. In the days leading up to the interview, victims of serial
child molestor and Olympic gymnastics doctor Larry Nassar sued the FBI for $130 million after agents charged with
investigating the abuse instead covered it up by fabricating victim statements. Pelly [sic] failed to ask Wray a single
question about the scandal. Pelley also failed to ask Wray about the humiliating acquittal of two men the FBI attempted
to entrap into the Governor Gretchen Whitmer plot engineered by the FBI to interfere in the 2020 election. Among the
FBI agents involved, one was accused of perjury, another of wife beating (now convicted), and a third of using the
investigation to help promote a side-business. Nor did Pelley ask about the FBI child rapist who rampaged across
multiple states for years under the noses of his colleagues responsible for protecting such victims, some younger than 13.
Nor did Pelley ask about the FBI's failure to stop the Jeffery Epstein child-rape-for-profit business. An FBI lawyer
pleaded guilty to falsifying evidence to help spy on a Trump campaign figure. Pelley didn't ask about that, either.
CBS
Outlines Causes of Massive Inflation, Identifies Everything Except Biden Policy. This Sunday [4/17/2022]
segment from CBS's Margaret Brennan allows us to watch narrative engineering in real time. During a segment outlining
the reasons behind the major economic issues American's are feeling, CBS notes everything except the reason the economy is
struggling. It really is quite a remarkable example of professional gaslighting. Watch the segment, note the
inflation crisis has been underway for more than 18 months, and notice how many justifications are made-up illusions.
(1) A Texas-Mexico cargo checkpoint issue that started less than a week ago; (2) Trucker shortages; (3) Ukraine-Russia
which started only 6 weeks ago; and (4) Pandemic lockdowns, now causing an excess in demand. None of these issues
are even close to the source of the issue. [Video clip]
Latest
January 6th 'Bombshell' About Donald Trump Smolders in Ruin. Some days ago, CBS News ran a "BREAKING" report
asserting that there were gaps in the White House telephone logs from January 6th. The story centered on two
assertions: One, that the Trump administration had altered the call logs, and two, that the then-president had used a
burner phone during the time period in question. From there, the implication was made that those actions were taken to
cover up an organized insurrection being directed by Donald Trump. [...] Now, if you read RedState, you may be aware of a
similar story that dropped a few months earlier. Back in February, the January 6th Committee started leaking about a
major revelation involving gaps in the White House's phone records. Yet, if you read past the hysteria at the time,
what you would have found is that there was no actual gap. Rather, calls were being made on the phones of staffers and
other phone records reflected that.
Lesley
Stahl Told President Trump in Her October 2020 Interview Before the Election the Hunter Biden Laptop "Can't Be
Verified" — She Lied. Lesley Stahl has quite a career of lies. Her most famous interview to
date was when she lied repeatedly to the American public in her interview with President Trump in October 2020 before the
presidential election. Stahl was carrying water for the Biden crime family. She must be very proud. The
country is doing so well. You can thank the far left hacks in the fake news media for doing their best to lie to the
American public about Joe Biden and his family's crimes. To this day the mainstream media still won't report on Joe's
obvious dementia that is obvious to everyone else in the world. Back in October 2020 President Trump defended himself
in his interview with Stahl saying there was proof of Joe Biden's criminal actions in Hunter Biden's laptop. Lesley
Stahl shut him down.
Ted
Cruz Taunts '60 Minutes' With Infamous Trump/Stahl Pre-Election Clip as Media Reckoning Begins. With the
implosion of the media's pre-presidential election fake narratives about the infamous Hunter Biden laptop emails becoming
officially official with the New York Times' "confirming" of the New York Post's original reporting on the subject, the calls
for media reckonings have understandably commenced apace. As you'll recall, the Post's pieces on the emails raised
major questions about the possibility of influence peddling from the Biden family, in particular with Joe Biden, who was the
Democratic nominee for president, and his son Hunter. The official word from the MSM at the time centered around a fake
"Russian disinformation" narrative sparked by a Politico report, allegedly sourced by "dozens of former intel officials" who
suggested in so many words that Russia cooked up the email scandal to influence the 2020 presidential election.
Ironically, a little less than a year after that notorious Politico report went viral, one of their political correspondents
was able to get "independent" confirmation for a book he was writing on the Bidens that at least two of the emails discovered
on Hunter Biden's abandoned laptop were authentic.
Anderson
Cooper's '60 Minutes' Softball Infomercial for Pete Buttigieg. The long-running CBS News program "60 Minutes"
has a manically split personality: Vicious attack dogs when Republicans are in power, but supportive infomercial
producers under Democrats. Take March 13 for example, when Anderson Cooper hosted a promotional segment for Transportation
Secretary Pete Buttigieg and the "bipartisan infrastructure bill." Buttigieg was touted as "40 years old, a Harvard
graduate, Rhodes Scholar, and former Navy Reserve officer who ran for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2020. Now
he's dealing with a pandemic-related supply chain crisis and trying to ensure that hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars are
well-spent on aging transportation systems in desperate need of repair." CBS began with a Pittsburgh bridge collapse from
January, as Cooper asked Buttigieg a series of bland softballs, such as: "When somebody's driving over a bridge, should
they feel confident?" Then Cooper followed up: "When grading the overall state of this country's infrastructure, the
American Society of Civil Engineers recently gave the U.S. a C-minus. How is it possible that a country like the United
States gets a C-minus on infrastructure?" These are easy pitches. They sound like questions Buttigieg's publicist
emailed to CBS.
As
Financial Markets Crash and Ukraine Burns, There's Nowhere Left to Hide for the Biden Administration. Then
there is the resolving picture of all the mysterious puzzle pieces in the Covid-19 story. Sunday night, America's
premier propaganda vessel, CBS's 60-Minutes, ran a puff-piece on the CDC starring the warm-and-fuzzy Mom figure,
Rochelle Walensky. It is hard to overstate just how dishonest the segment was, starting with its subtle effort to keep
America in a state of alarm ("new variants" coming!), proceeding to a deceptive cartoon of how the mRNA "vaccines" work
wonders ("white memory cells patrol the body," no mention of spike proteins), and concluding with exhortations for Americans
to continue vaxxing and boosting up — despite an avalanche of news coming from elsewhere than 60-Minutes
about the CDC withholding critical information from the public it's supposed to serve throughout the two-year-plus crisis,
not to mention new data from alt-media on extensive injury and death rates among the vaccinated, including shocking info from
the court-ordered recent release of Pfizer's own records. Was this 60-Minutes segment corporate media's attempt to
cover up the emerging crimes of America's public health agencies in concert with Pharma and media itself? That is,
to get ahead of the story, as has lately been the strategy for all the cable channels and legacy newspapers with more
and more citizens asking themselves if they have been played? Meanwhile, the Big Kahuna of Covid-19, one Dr. Anthony
Fauci, has gone-to-ground, made himself scarce, skipped the scene, vamoosed... amid all the new controversy.
Mike
Lindell and CPAC Attendees Shout Down Fake News CBS Reporter At CPAC. Mike Lindell was confronted by a CBS
reporter earlier today at the annual CPAC conference in Orlando, Florida. Mike totally roasted the reporter and CBS
News, calling them "disgusting" and "traitors" to America. The crowd on CPAC's media row joined Lindell and started
chanting "traitor, traitor, traitor" at the fake news reporter. America is done with the fake news propaganda.
CBS
News: The source for inflation and supply-chain woes is ... Ukraine? How did a crisis in February 2022
kick off inflation in (checks notes) May 2021? Through the magic of narrative journalism, my friends, through the magic of
narrative journalism. CBS News offered up this Twitter hot take on two major Biden administration failures by blaming
them on Russia's aggression in Ukraine. [...] This is nothing more than a cheap and transparent attempt to excuse Biden from
any responsibility for inflation and the supply-chain crisis. It's so bald in this effort that it borders on
self-parody, as is the fact that CBS hasn't taken this tweet down as of this writing despite the roars of laughter and gales
of criticism they're getting on Twitter over it.
CBS
Outlines Collapsed Support for Biden Regime, But Purposefully Ignore One Central Component of Their Own Poll.
CBS conducted a poll of the collapsed support for Joe Biden and then outlined their findings earlier today [1/16/2022].
However, keeping up with their need to ignore things, they skip over how the vaccination mandate is opposed within their
responses. Margaret Brennan and Anthony Salvanto, CBS News' director of elections and surveys, discuss how inflation
and the economy are the two central issues at the top of concern. However, Joe Biden's handling of COVID, and
specifically the vaccination mandate, are also driving opposition to the regime intent. [Video clip] The
people behind Biden have boxed him in on the economic consequences. Inflation is an outcome of economic policy that
cannot be reversed without completely refuting their own policy and reversing course. As a consequence, there's nothing
Biden can do to stop this negative outcome.
Top five
media lies of 2021. [#4] "60 Minutes" deceptively edited Ron DeSantis interview: CBS News' "60 Minutes
"deceptively edited a clip from a press conference that Florida governor Ron DeSantis gave about the distribution of the
COVID-19 vaccine. The misleading clip suggests that DeSantis had awarded Publix, a popular supermarket chain in
Florida, with the opportunity to distribute the COVID-19 vaccines because of the campaign donations he received from the
corporation. CBS removed all the parts DeSantis spent explaining that Publix had actually been selected due to the
hundreds of locations they had across the state, leaving only the part he calls the accusations "fake narrative." CBS
never apologized or retracted the video.
CBS'
'Face the Nation' corrects claim Rittenhouse crossed state lines while armed: 'Oversight in language'. CBS'
"Face the Nation" had to issue a correction after a reporter claimed on Sunday that Kyle Rittenhouse crossed state lines
"armed for battle" ahead of his deadly encounter in Kenosha, Wisconsin. In the initial report, reporter Mark Strassman
suggested Rittenhouse crossed state lines, from Illinois into Wisconsin, with a gun in his possession. However, court
testimony and police interviews revealed that the Smith & Wesson M&P 15 rifle Rittenhouse used during the Kenosha riots
was already in the city ahead of his trip. "Lots to unpack here, this country's ongoing moment of racial reckoning,
vigilantism, and self-defense claims from armed people who deputize themselves," Strassman added.
CBS
Corrects False Claim Rittenhouse Crossed State Lines While Armed. CBS has corrected the false claim a reporter
offered on air regarding Kyle Rittenhouse. On Sunday's [11/21/2021] "Face the Nation," Mark Strassman falsely reported
that Rittenhouse "drove in from Illinois armed for battle." The falsehood was one of many spread by news outlets and
influencers in the wake of Rittenhouse being acquitted. The network has not responded to a request for comment and
Strassman couldn't be reached. Viewers weren't made aware of the misinformation but CBS has added an editor's note to
the transcript of the morning show. "Kyle Rittenhouse testified that he did not drive to Kenosha with a weapon.
It was not illegal for Rittenhouse to posses [sic] that particular weapon. We apologize for this oversight in language,"
CBS said in the note.
The Editor says...
Preventing an "oversight in language" is what the well-paid managing editors are for. And if this had been the first
and only time that a poor choice of words was used to describe Mr. Rittenhouse, it might be forgivable, but apparently this
was part of a continuing pattern. All of the managers in the CBS newsroom are responsible for making sure their "news"
stories are accurate, truthful, and free of defamatory pronouncements. In this they failed, and must now pay the price.
CBS
News Caught on Camera Admitting they no Longer Care if they're Viewed As Trustworthy Or Objective. Ron
Treviño, CBS Houston News Anchor: "I don't really care if people trust us or not, we still have to do our
job. Whether they trust us is the least of my concerns — whether they trust me or not." Finally, a news
organization gets caught on camera admitting they're not objectice, nor do they care if people trust their news as
accurate. Project Veritas has once again showed the world just how corrupt the media is. [Video clip]
No,
CBS News, Global Warming Did Not Create Taliban Victory. CBS News published an article today claiming global warming
was a major factor in the Taliban overrunning Afghanistan and creating murderous chaos throughout the country, rather than political
ineptitude. CBS News argues that global warming created horrible weather conditions that decimated crop production during the
past 30 years in the country, and the Taliban fed off the misery experienced by Afghan farmers. The objective truth is
entirely the opposite. [...] CBS News claims that climate change in Afghanistan during "the last three decades ... have destroyed
crops and left people hungry." As you can see, however, Afghanistan has fully doubled its crop yields during the past
three decades.
CBS
Hides Corruption of 1619 Project, Asks 'Impeccable' Creator to 'Clarify'. The journalists at CBS This
Morning on Tuesday [7/6/2021] continued their efforts to hide the historical illiteracy and massive errors in the 1619
Project. Co-host Gayle King devoted 10 minutes to gushing over lead writer Nikole Hannah-Jones[,] The New York
Times journalist who just turned down a professorship position at the University of North Carolina after a tenure
battle. Appearing as an exclusive for CBS, King focused on Hannah-Jones's move to Howard University and her rejection
of UNC. As for the 1619 Project, the host fawned, "Can we say you have a 20 year career with impeccable credentials?
Let's talk about the 1619 Project. Because The New York Times did issue a clarification, not a correction. They said
they have stood by you. There was a clarification. What was the clarification and what is your response to the criticism?"
Five
MSM Lies for Which Trump Has Been Vindicated, and the Damage They Caused. [#4] Hunter Biden: Everyone
knew Hunter Biden was a cad, and we also had a pretty good idea that he was on-the-take with foreign actors, particularly in
Ukraine. President Trump knew it as well, made no secret of his thoughts, and got impeached for an unprecedented second
time for his efforts. The media, meanwhile, pooh-poohed the whole story for as long as the could, which just happened
to be until after the election in early-December when the validity of the story became clear. During an appearance on
60 Minutes with Leslie Stahl in late-October, President Trump pointed to the younger Biden and correctly observed that
Joe Biden was embroiled in a scandal over his son Hunter, but Stahl was defiant, insisting "He's not. He's not." Oh
Leslie, he is. He is. So, what if the media had told us the truth from the beginning with the Hunter Biden Scandal?
Finding
a way to present Joe Biden's tax-and-spend speech as a hit with the public. Joe Biden's quasi
state-of-the-union speech the other night was a miserable affair. With a void of new ideas, Biden shilled a leftist
tax-and-spend scheme writ large, with an ugly side of wokesterism. One problem: The voting public despises this
[stuff]. So out trots the media to put the spin on it, bolstering the old foof, and hammer, hammer, hammering home the
lie that Biden's speech was somehow popular. [...] The problem of course, is that the CBS/YouGov poll sampled an audience
that was hugely skewed Democrat. Fifty-four percent of the audience was Democrat, while only 34% of American voters
identify as Democrats, as CBS noted lower, way lower, down in the story. A president's political base is always going
to have a positive response to their leader. If they don't, then it becomes actual news. Biden's leftist base
loves him is the story here, although they didn't put it that way. What exactly was news about this?
Americans
[Doubt] CBS Poll Claiming 85% Approve of Biden Speech. Democrats are all rabidly promoting a CBS poll about the
reaction to Joe Biden's speech before Congress tonight. The poll claimed that 85% of the viewers they surveyed approved
of Biden's speech. [...] Now, we can say a lot about polls, but 85% is North Korea level propaganda. It's so high you
know that there's a problem. This is basically CBS trying to shill for the Democrats. They tried to sell that
Americans saw Biden as "unifying" and "inspirational." This is Joe Biden, guys, you can't sell that here. Listen as CBS
tells us they spoke to a "representative" sample of Americans to reach those numbers. Except then as they explain more,
the problem comes out. As they continue, that sample was anything but "representative." [Video clip]
CBS
Attacks Trial Judge for Rebuking Maxine Waters' Call to Violence. In strong comments during the closing
arguments in the Derek Chauvin trial on Monday [4/19/2021], Judge Peter Cahill rebuked radical Democratic Congresswoman
Maxine Waters (CA) for calling on Black Lives Matter to be more violent if the jury returned a not guilty verdict. And
like clockwork, the CBS Evening News framed Judge Cahill as the problem, even the aggressor by claiming he was
"lashing out" at Waters and perhaps working with the defense team. Following a segment on the trial's closing arguments
in general, CBS anchor Norah O'Donnell stepped in to defend the radical Congresswoman. "And Jamie, something
extraordinary happened after the jury left to deliberate. The judge lashing out at a U.S. congresswoman. Even
mentioning the possibility, a verdict could be overturned in the future," she teed up correspondent Jamie Yuccas.
Yuccas' first move was to downplay and brush over what Waters said to the BLM mob.
Ron
DeSantis Shows How to Fight Back and Stomps All Over '60 Minutes' in the Process. One of the things that makes
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis so interesting is not only is he smart with a terrific background, but he's also a fighter, he
doesn't take any guff from anyone and certainly not from media, as we saw in the case of "60 Minutes." DeSantis
appeared on "Fox and Friends" on Wednesday [4/14/2021] and took the opportunity to just level the CBS show for their
deceptive piece against him and their remarks about the piece on their show on Sunday.
The
Left Doesn't Want You to Believe in DeSantis Claus. Is the race for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination
already over? "60 Minutes" seems to think so. They did a dishonest hatchet job on one governor, leaving all the
others jealous that the media doesn't think enough of them to try and destroy them before they become Joe Biden's
nemesis. That governor is Ron DeSantis of Florida. "60 Minutes" didn't attack Greg Abbott of Texas. They
didn't attack Kristi Noem of South Dakota. They didn't attack Doug Ducey of Arizona, or even Brian Kemp of Georgia. "60
Minutes" admitted which Republican fuels its nightmares by attacking Florida Man Ron DeSantis.
Has
DeSantis Become More Dangerous to Democrats Than Trump? The other day it was "Sixty Minutes" — Dan
Rather's old stomping grounds before he was caught in some big time fibbing, speaking of presidential elections —
trying to smear the Florida governor, asserting he had favored Publix in lucrative COVID vaccine distribution because the
supermarket chain gave him a campaign donation. (As is the corporate custom, Publix did the same with virtually every
other politician, including, apparently, Bernie Sanders.) About five minutes serious research would have unearthed the
absurdity of this charge — since debunked by several Florida Democrats — but with the anti-DeSantis
zeitgeist at the ultra-establishment "Sixty Minutes" five months wouldn't have been enough, even with the myriad producers
and assistants working at CBS. The need to "get" DeSantis overwhelmed all, including, as has been noted everywhere except
for most of the mainstream media, cherry-picking the governor's remarks to turn them inside out.
'I Know
I'll Be Ordering Mine!': DeSantis Loves New '60 Minutes Of Lies' T-Shirt. On Friday morning, after the sports
website Outkick responded to the "60 Minutes" hit piece on Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis by announcing they were
selling a T-shirt emblazoned "60 Minutes of lies," DeSantis quickly responded, quipping, "I know I'll be ordering
mine!" As The Daily Wire has chronicled over the last week, the furor over last Sunday's hit piece by "60 Minutes"
was precipitated by its deceptive reporting in which the show elided crucial parts of DeSantis' answer to a query from a
"60 Minutes" reporter.
The
Media Tried to Smear Ron DeSantis. It Backfired. On Sunday [4/4/2021], the CBS show 60 Minutes aired a
dishonest, convoluted, story about Florida Governor Ron DeSantis. The segment leveled a completely unfounded accusation
against Gov. DeSantis, accusing him of choosing the Publix supermarket chain to distribute the COVID-19 vaccine because
Publix had contributed $100,000 to his Friends of DeSantis campaign PAC. Anyone who has spent more than five minutes in
Florida knows that the Publix chain is ubiquitous and, more importantly, beloved and trusted by Floridians. The
60 Minutes episode was deeply unethical. Sharyn Alfonsi, the reporter for 60 Minutes whose story it was, comes off
like a political activist in her interaction with DeSantis, accusing the governor of "pay-to-play" after cornering him at a press
conference. [...] But the public would not get to hear his response, at least not from CBS. In an appalling edit, 60 Minutes
cut the DeSantis answer to make him seem abrasive and angry and to make his comprehensive answer seem flimsy.
CBS
faces bipartisan backlash after '60 Minutes' aired selectively edited footage of DeSantis. CBS is facing
bipartisan backlash after using heavily edited footage of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis in a"60 Minutes" story alleging
potential political corruption on the part of the Republican politician. "60 Minutes" reporter Sharyn Alfonsi alleged in
a recent report for the long-running news magazine that wealthy residents of Florida "cut the line during [the state's]
frenzied vaccine rollout." In the segment, Alfonsi suggested that the state government's recent decision to award a vaccine
distribution contract to the grocery chain Publix had the appearance of potential favoritism. Citing public financial
records, Alfonsi noted that "weeks before the governor's announcement, Publix donated $100,000 to his political action
committee, Friends of Ron DeSantis." As part of the report, Alfonsi questioned DeSantis at a late March press conference
about the arrangement, suggesting the governor had engaged in "pay-to-play" with the grocery chain.
DeSantis
Blasts '60 Minutes' Conspiracy Theory About Vaccine Distribution in Florida. During an interview with Fox News
Monday night [4/5/2021], Florida Republican Governor Ron DeSantis blasted 60 Minutes, a CBS News program, for deliberately
editing his comments about vaccine distribution. They did so to make it look like DeSantis was engaged in a pay-for-play
scheme, which never happened. As Leah writes, there are a number of problems with their "reporting." "Lost in this
is we've vaccinated now 3.5 million senior citizens. We were the first state to say we're doing seniors first.
We're not going to follow the CDC recommendation and what we have done has worked. They didn't want to discuss that and
obviously they selectively edited the background. They tried to act like their was a conspiracy with Publix," DeSantis
said. "They didn't tell you that we were doing African-American church vaccination drives before Publix ever gave a single
shot. They didn't tell you that. They didn't tell you that hospitals were doing shots, starting in the first week of
December because it did't fit the narrative."
Grenell:
False DeSantis Story Was a Strategy, Not a Mistake. ACLJ Senior Advisor for National Security and Foreign
Policy Ric Grenell joins Sekulow to discuss the backlash CBS show 60 Minutes has faced after airing a misleading, inaccurate
story about Florida Governor Ron DeSantis' response to COVID-19. We also discuss how the MLB has moved the All-Star game out
of Atlanta in protest of Georgia's new voting laws and how this move will affect Atlanta's working class and small business
owners. [Video clip]
'This
Is Not Over': DeSantis Blasts '60 Minutes' Report on Florida's Vaccine Rollout. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis
harshly criticized a recent "60 Minutes" report in a press conference on Tuesday [4/6/2021]. "They cut out everything
that showed that their narrative was a piece of horse manure," DeSantis said. The governor was referring to how "60
Minutes" omitted 356 words from his 423-word answer in their report. "And it shows you how dishonest, these are smear
merchants, that's why nobody trusts corporate media. They are a disaster in what they're doing. They knew what
they were doing was a lie. I knew what they were doing was a lie. Everybody here knows what they were doing is a
lie. They know that we know they're lying and yet they continue to lie," he continued. DeSantis then reasserted
his intent to defend himself against the allegations and hold the corporate media responsible.
How
the '60 Minutes' Hit on Ron DeSantis Collapsed into a Steaming Pile of Fake News. 60 Minutes, a
long-disgraced news magazine that airs on far-left CBS, launched a political assassination attempt against Gov. Ron
DeSantis (R-FL) Sunday night. By Monday afternoon, this shamelessly dishonest hoax and conspiracy theory had collapsed
into a steaming pile of fake news. According to the long-disgraced 60 Minutes, DeSantis accepted a $100,000
political donation from Publix supermarkets and then awarded Publix with a vaccine contract. In other words:
pay-for-play. Here's how the hoax fell apart: It began with the discovery that the long-disgraced
60 Minutes had deliberately and maliciously edited a clip of DeSantis while he answered a round of questions and
heckling from disgraced-60 Minutes correspondent Sharyn Alfonsi. Through this deliberate act of malicious
editing, the long-disgraced 60 Minutes tried to make DeSantis look like a fool as he dodged her question.
The truth, however, as we saw in the full video, is that he answered her question at detailed length and did so to the
satisfaction of any reasonable person.
"60
Minutes should be ashamed": Dem Palm Beach County mayor says CBS smeared Ron DeSantis with Publix segment. Do
you know how unfair a story has to be to a Republican, especially a Trumpist Republican with national ambitions, for multiple
Democrats to step up in his defense? That's where we are with the "60 Minutes" hit piece on DeSantis, which Ed covered
this morning. The nutshell version: Publix, a ubiquitous supermarket chain in Florida, donated $100,000 to
DeSantis and ended up partnering with the state to distribute the COVID vaccine. Smells like a quid pro quo to us, "60
Minutes" asserted. But Jared Moskowitz, the director of the Florida's Division of Emergency Management, said that was
nonsense, claiming that Publix was recommended by experts because other big-chain pharmacies weren't ready to start
vaccinating yet.
Florida
Democrats Defend DeSantis Against Attack From '60 Minutes'. Several Florida Democrats are challenging a report
by the CBS News program "60 Minutes" that attempted to paint the state's vaccination partnership with the Publix grocery
store chain as nefarious. The program on April 4 explored the COVID-19 vaccine rollout in Florida, which has
experienced a similar COVID-19 death rate to California and other states despite having much looser restrictions. In
one heated exchange, a reporter pressed Gov. Ron DeSantis on the use of Publix stores to administer vaccines, claiming
the fact that Publix contributed $100,000 to his political action committee before the chain was chosen could be seen as
evidence of a "pay-for-play" scheme. DeSantis called the allegation "a fake narrative," offering a lengthy explanation
of what had unfolded. It included state officials reaching out to pharmacies besides CVS and Walgreens because those
two companies were tasked with delivering vaccines to long-term care facilities.
Democratic
Florida Officials Explain How 60 Minutes Twisted DeSantis-Publix Story. Looking to expand COVID-19
vaccine distribution sites over the winter, Florida's emergency management director says he first reached out to Walmart, not
Publix, to execute the mission. The reason: Walmart has more locations than Publix in socially vulnerable, rural
areas in Florida. But Walmart wouldn't be ready to distribute the vaccine for three weeks, Jared Moskowitz, the state's
emergency management director, told National Review. So, he reached out to Publix, a Florida-based grocery and
pharmacy chain. "Publix said they could be ready in 72 hours," said Moskowitz, who is a Democrat. "I picked
Publix. Walked into the governor's office the next day, gave them the plan about why we needed to turn on more
locations, especially in some rural, fiscally constrained areas." Moskowitz's take, that he was the one who recommended
Publix stores as the state's first pharmacy vaccination sites, runs counter to a 60 Minutes story on Sunday [4/4/2021]
that implied that Florida governor Ron DeSantis picked Publix to distribute vaccines as part of a "pay to play" scheme.
60
Minutes' Dishonest DeSantis Hit Job. There is no more accurate way of describing last night's [4/4/2021]
60 Minutes segment on Governor Ron DeSantis of Florida than as a political hit job. It was an aspersion, a
slander, a smear — a calculated and premeditated calumny contrived for one purpose and one purpose alone: To
hint darkly at scandal where none exists, and, thereby, to damage DeSantis in 2022 and beyond. Americans who tuned in
to 60 Minutes yesterday are now less informed than they were before it aired.
'60
Minutes' Ignores Democrat Governors' Scandals, Invents One About DeSantis. Rather than cover actual scandals
involving Democrat governors and their botched responses to COVID, CBS' "60 Minutes" tried to invent a scandal involving
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis' distribution of vaccines. To push the false narrative and protect its favored
governors, "60 Minutes" refused to interview people who disputed its false narrative, selectively edited video to hide facts,
and omitted data that debunked its thesis and accurately describe Florida's success. It's not that "60 Minutes"
couldn't have reported on real scandals involving governors and COVID, if it wanted to. New York's Democrat
Gov. Andrew Cuomo, a media darling despite his many failures, sent COVID patients into long-term care facilities full of
vulnerable people, and then covered it up. California's Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom has imposed draconian lockdown
measures that have crushed his state's economy, its schools, and the entire population of the state. He's currently
facing a recall attempt from citizens livid at his handling.
If
the Media's Attack on Ron DeSantis Seems Desperate, It's Because It Is. The 60 Minutes "report" on Ron DeSantis
wasn't just ridiculous, it was absolutely bizarre. Not only did the news show completely deny the science we know about
how infectious the Coronavirus is to seniors, they completely left out key elements of the information they gathered to make
him seem corrupt. Why are they doing this? The reason is desperation. DeSantis is ruining everything the
left is trying to accomplish both in narrative and agenda. [Video clip]
CBS
Attempts To Controversialize Florida Governor Ron DeSantis For Doing Exceptional Job With COVID Response. You
can always tell who the left-wing media fear by the way they attempt to create false attacks against them. Florida
Governor Ron DeSantis has done an outstanding job leading his state through the COVID crisis. While balancing the
economic needs of the people, and keeping the majority of the state functioning and open, DeSantis prioritized protecting the
most vulnerable elderly citizens; and then, once available, coordinating the COVID vaccine for that vulnerable population by
expediting a massive distribution network to be the first state with over one million doses administered for those who wanted
it. In addition DeSantis allowed local communities to make their own decisions about mask wearing and school opening.
The
Deranged 60 Minutes Hit Piece on Ron DeSantis Gives the Game Away. The left are terrified of Ron DeSantis, and
that was never made more apparent than how 60 Minutes chose to handle the supposed "scandals" surrounding Florida's vaccine
program. RedState initially covered the absurdity last night. As Jennifer Van Laar put it in her write-up, the
memo has gone out to destroy DeSantis, facts [notwithstanding]. While 60 Minutes attempted to make it seem like
DeSantis had been paid off to allow Publix to host early, pop-up vaccination sites, the truth is much more mundane. You
see, Publix has over 800 locations in Florida and also has large facilities and parking lots, a combination unmatched by
smaller stores like CVS and Walgreens. Further, and more importantly, they were the only major outlet ready to go in
January to start distribution. This is largely due to Publix already taking the lead in delivering millions of flu
vaccinations a year. In other words, they had the systems and infrastructure in place.
CBS
lies by omission about Governor Ron DeSantis. There are two loci of corruption in America: Academia and
the media. Academia churns out legions of indoctrinated young people, and the media churn out lies. The latest
example is the way that CBS edited a press conference that Florida Governor Ron DeSantis held to make it appear that he had
granted vaccination rights to the Publix grocery store chain in exchange for campaign donations. To the media's dismay,
Florida sailed through the COVID panic because it didn't panic. Governor Ron DeSantis made the logical decision
when the disease hit America to protect the vulnerable and to allow all the others in his state to get on with their
lives. To the Democrats' chagrin, at the end of the day, Florida did no worse than the lockdown states, while
preserving both its economy and its civil liberties. Because of his competence, conservatives are turning longing eyes
to DeSantis as a possible Republican contender in 2024. The media, of course, must destroy him.
CBS
News Stealth Edits Article Promoting Pure Activism Against Georgia Election Law. I wrote earlier about a
disturbing CBS News tweet and article where they actively encouraged full-on, Democratic activism against the new Georgia
election law, as well as other laws they considered to be similar. They got a lot of backlash for their naked
partisanship, and it obviously hit home. They've since deleted the tweet, but we have it here. [Tweet] They
also stealth edited the headline as well. It had been, "3 ways companies can help fight Georgia's restrictive new
voting law," taking an active voice. It was then changed to "Activists are calling on big companies to challenge new
voting laws. Here's what they're asking for." It still listed the actions people could take against the
law — and against Republicans who supported it. But, too late — we already saw it, and they
already tipped their hand; it was pure advocacy, not news.
United Kingdom-based
newspapers accuse CBS of 'dishonest misrepresentation' during Oprah interview. A group of United Kingdom-based
newspapers accused CBS of taking headlines out of context during Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's highly publicized tell-all
interview with Oprah Winfrey during a "misleading montage" designed to deceive viewers. Associated Newspapers,
publishers of Mail Online, the Daily Mail and The Mail On Sunday, sent a scathing letter to CBS accusing the network of
presenting doctored and out-of-context images as headlines during the "Oprah with Meghan and Harry" special Sunday night
[3/8/2021]. The letter sent Friday and obtained by Fox News began with CBS' internal messaging about the network putting
an emphasis on accuracy and integrity but notes the recent special didn't meet the network's standards.
DAY
5 of Obama TV on CBS: Vacation Pal Gayle King Cheers Michelle. Tuesday [11/17/2020] was day five of Obama TV.
Also known as CBS This Morning. Co-host Gayle King, an Obama donor who has vacationed with the family, yet
again highlighted the latest on the Democrats. King cheered the "powerful message" of Mrs. Obama going after
Donald Trump again.
Mr. Obama, The 'Strangulation' Victim Is Not George Floyd.
On Sunday, 60 Minutes' resident sycophant, Scott Pelley, walked former president Barack Obama through a racial
landscape unrecognizable to those who know the lay of the land, especially readers of The American Spectator.
Pelley kicked off the misdirection with the question, "Did you watch the video of George Floyd's strangulation?" Yes,
strangulation. Knowing Obama's weakness for racial scare-mongering, I was not at all surprised by his refusal to
correct Pelley. He probably did not know enough to do so in any case. "Of course," said Obama. "It was
heartbreaking." He then blathered on about an African-American "reality" that exists only in America's newsrooms. As to
the aftermath of the Floyd death, Obama claimed to have been "heartened and inspired" by the "marches." He offered not a
single word about the stores looted, the buildings burned, the people killed. Nor did Pelley venture a single question.
We Soon Learn Whether Most Americans
Are Any Different From the Masses Who Fell in Line With Hitler and Stalin. [Scroll down] Lesley Stahl
said a great deal when she told the president she would not ask him about the Hunter Biden laptop because CBS had not
independently verified its ownership. So the biggest scandal imaginable — a corrupt and immoral presidential
candidate who leveraged his political positions for half a century to get his family and him rich by compromising the
national interest in order to curry favor with our nation's mortal enemies — is kiboshed. In lockstep
Facebook and Twitter will not allow the New York Post to share its extraordinary journalistic breakthrough on the
Hunter Biden laptop. Of course the laptop was Hunter Biden's — the signature on the repair order, the
photos within it of him naked in a bathtub, the emails verified by a third party who worked with him. But they will not
tell the story, and they will not allow others to tell it, so half the country's voters do not even know enough about the
story to reject it.
Lesley
Stahl Is Wrong And Trump Is Right: The Obama Administration Spied On The Trump Campaign. Last week,
President Trump's team released 38 minutes of unedited video capturing his contentious sit-down with Lesley Stahl of
"60 Minutes." Sunday evening, CBS broadcast clips of the interview and amazingly let air proof of Trump's charge
that the media is fake news: "60 Minutes" and Stahl falsely reported that it is "unverified" that the Obama-Biden
administration spied on Trump's campaign in 2016. Trump and not Stahl raised this scandal, as the unedited video
showed, after he reversed roles with his interviewer and pushed her to say whether she thought it was okay for Hunter Biden
to give "the big guy" a 10 percent cut of money raised by Democratic presidential contender Joe Biden's son in China,
and whether it was okay for China to give the Biden family one and a half billion dollars to manage and for Joe to then
negotiate with China on behalf of Americans. "60 Minutes" edited out those details of the Biden scandal, but let
the television audience hear Trump say of it, "It's the biggest scan..." before correcting himself, "the second biggest
scandal. The biggest scandal was when they spied on my campaign."
"60
Minutes" Has a History of Running False, Unverified Reports. This CBS format of "investigation " by buffed-up
"reporters" has a long history of peddling fake news. It falsely reported a problem with the Audi 5000's acceleration,
which was not a mechanical problem, but the result of operator failure. It falsely touted that Alar on apples presented
a high health risk. (Something that the Natural Resources Defense Council had promoted that fattened its coffers).
Based on a forged document, it falsely accused the U.S. Customs Service of facilitating drug trafficking along our southern
border and settled with the defamed officer and retracted the story. In more recent history, Dan Rather used it as a
vehicle for promoting fake documents about President George W. Bush's history with the National Guard.
Fake
News Caught Again — CBS Uses Photo From "Latinos for Trump" as Image for Biden Latino Outreach in
Miami. Good catch. A sharp twitter user from Arizona noticed this fake news effort. CBS used a
picture from President Trump's "Latino's for Trump" event as a manipulative picture to showcase Joe Biden's Latino outreach
effort in Miami. Those are not Biden Latino supporters in Miami; those are President Trump Latino supporters in
Arizona. [Photos] The scale of manipulative effort by U.S. media is off the charts. This is beyond "fake
news"; this is a full scale psychological campaign on behalf of U.S. media for their preferred candidate.
CBS reporter tweets
about Biden not 'outworking' Trump. CBS reporter Kathryn Watson questioned why Joe Biden wasn't campaigning
more after news broke that the former vice president was not expected to have public events Saturday [9/12/2020]. "Not
sure why Biden isn't doing more to show he can outwork Trump," Watson tweeted Saturday in response to Politico reporter Jake
Sherman announcing a lid had been called in Wilmington, Del., meaning no events for Biden. "And yes I realize there's a
pandemic and he shouldn't be out shaking hands. But he has a team of experienced people at his disposal to think up
creative ways to campaign safely," she added.
CBS
Claims Riots in Rochester 'Largely Peaceful'. As I reported on Friday night, thousands of BLM rioted in
Rochester last night. By one count, there were 5,500 people in the street. But they upped their attacks a bit
tonight [9/5/2020]. They not only smashed windows and set things on fire; they stormed into the restaurants demanding the
businesses shut down, smashing dishes, overturning tables, threatening and intimidating diners, some of whom fled in terror
in some very disturbing videos. [Video clips] The BLM are literally the fascists of whom they complain:
intimidating people and bashing businesses like the Red Guard or the Brown Shirts. BLM also attacked the police,
throwing projectiles and fireworks at them.
'CBS
wants a race war': Outlet slammed for headline saying police killed black man while leaving out he reportedly fired
first. CBS News drew criticism Wednesday for a headline on a story involving police shooting and killing a
black man without mentioning the man allegedly opened fire first. "Deputies kill half-brother of black man found hanged
in park," a CBS headline posted on Twitter Wednesday read, referring to the death of Terron Jammal Boone. Boone was the
half-brother of Robert Fuller, a black man found hanging in a park on June 10 in what was first believed to be a suicide
before the coroner walked back that conclusion. The tweet doesn't include the police report that states officers
attempted to stop Boone, who was wanted for kidnapping, spousal assault, and assault with a deadly weapon, at which point he
jumped out of his vehicle and opened fire on officers before they shot and killed him.
CBS
Deceptively Edits Barr Interview, Leaving Out Key Details On Violent Riots, Police Oversight. Key details on
violent riots near the White House were removed from the broadcast of an interview of Attorney General William Barr on CBS
News' "Face The Nation" Sunday. Anchor Margaret Brennan repeatedly described protests as "peaceful" and the clearing of
protesters to set up a stronger perimeter as unnecessarily rushed, contentions Barr strongly denied. Left out of the
interview that aired on CBS on Sunday morning [6/7/2020] was Barr's detailed accounting of much of the violent context of
that perimeter expansion, including that "bricks and inflammable liquid" were being thrown at police in Lafayette Square near
the White House as rioters "were trying to get entry" over the fences, the five dozen officers guarding Lafayette Square who
were "lost" the night prior in the violence, and the individuals who at the time of their forced dispersal "wrestled with the
police officers trying to tear their shields from them, in one case, struggling to get one of the police officer's guns."
AG
Barr: Protesters In D.C. 'Were Not Peaceful,' Hundreds Of Officers Injured, Media Promoting 'Big Lies'.
Attorney General William Barr disputed many claims made by the mainstream media about last week's riots during an interview
on Sunday, saying that the media has been telling the American public "big lies" about what is going on at the allegedly
peaceful protests, and that there have been "750 officers hurt in the last week." "On Monday, Lafayette Park was cleared
of protesters," CBS News host Margaret Brennan said. "The federal agents who were there report up to you. Did you
think it was appropriate for them to use smoke bombs, tear gas, pepper balls, projectiles at what appeared to be peaceful
protesters?" "They were not peaceful protesters," Barr said. "And that's one of the big lies that the media seems
to be perpetuating at this point."
James
O'Keefe: CBS Faked a Line of Cars to Make Corona Tests Seem Harder to Get. Did CBS fake a line of cars in
Michigan in order to make it seem like COVID-19 testing was even more difficult? That's what Project Veritas creator
James O'Keefe asserts in a new video. Footage of the May 1 CBS This Morning shows a long line of vehicles
waiting for drive-by testing in Michigan. According to O'Keefe, "A CBS News crew pulled medical professionals off the
floor at the Cherry Medical Center in Grand Rapids, Michigan, to line up in their vehicles so a CBS film crew would have a
long line for their COVID-19 coverage." O'Keefe talked to an anonymous witness in Grand Rapids who alleged that CBS
"told us that medical personnel were taken away from treating patients and making the line longer for actual patients wait
for the COVID-19 test."
Trump
Unloads On Media During Coronavirus Briefing. President Donald Trump took the fight directly to the media this
week, playing a video of all of their poor coverage of the coronavirus outbreak and showing all of the steps the Trump
administration has taken to try to mitigate the pandemic. CNN accused the president of playing "propaganda," while CBS
News' Paula Reid falsely claimed that the administration had a "gap" where they didn't take any action in February.
A
dishonest report from CBS's 60 Minutes on the medical mask shortage. CBS, the network that brought us the
crying nurse with mental health issues who didn't understand hospital procedures, and the two, count 'em, two, video
instances of Italian hospital mayhem to make phony claims about chaos at New York and Pennsylvania hospitals in the
coronavirus pandemic, has now put out another whopper. This time, it's a 60 Minutes segment about mask and
personal protective equipment shortages at a New York City hospital, which, its report argues, is all Trump's fault.
CBS
learns nothing after [having been] busted for fake footage, replays same Italy hospital scene reporting on Philly. CBS News
used fake hospital footage in a coronavirus story and followed up with an explanation for the "editing mistake" after getting caught.
But apparently the network learned nothing and amazingly used the exact same footage again after claiming it would be removing the deceptive
video "from all platforms and shows." In a news story about New York City hospitals which aired on March 25, CBS News used
footage from an Italian hospital which had already appeared in a Sky News report on March 22.
The Editor says...
It sounds like CBS is willfully dishonest in its continued use of this fake news footage. But having worked
in TV broadcasting most of my life, I think abject incompetence is a more likely explanation. Broadcast stations today
are full of lazy millenials who don't care much about accuracy, and each of them has their "own truth." Chance are,
there was a memo sent out to delete the misleading footage, and less than 100 percent of the writers and editors paid
attention to it. That's how things get on the air that weren't supposed to be on the air. On the other hand,
the people at CBS may also be dishonest, lazy, or determined to advance a left-wing agenda by any means.
CBS
News Goes Full Fake but Accurate With Correction on Viral Crying Nurse Video. Several days ago, CBS News
tweeted out a now-viral video of a nurse crying over not being able to wear a mask. The description made it sound as if
her hospital had run out of or outright denied her use of protective equipment. The indication was clear. This
was Trump's fault because doctors and nurses aren't getting the supplies they need. [Video clip] In a word,
the description of the video and the situation have now been exposed as nonsense. The background of the woman who made
the video has also come under serious, relevant scrutiny.
Jussie
Smollett in Scrubs: CBS Story of Crying Nurse Who Claimed No COVID-19 Protection Just Crumbled. CBS News
has picked up the story of the woman who claims her hospital gave her no protection to take care of COVID-19 patients.
But CBS News apparently didn't check the story because, as they say, it was too good to check. Imaris Vera, part-time
nurse and part-time Instagram model, claims she quit her job at a Chicago area hospital — still unnamed —
because the hospital didn't provide nurses with proper equipment around COVID-19 patients. All we've heard is howls from
governors and CDC officials for us not to take away gear from first responders. Save the PPE and the N-95 masks for the
pros. So at first blush, the story looked like it might be true. Then it started crumbling.
CBS
News Posts Fraudulent Viral Video of Sobbing ICU Nurse Who Quit Her Job Over Poor Working Conditions, Mask Shortage —
It Was All a Lie. CBS News was caught once again posting a fraudulent video to make it look like President Trump is
failing in his response to the Coronavirus pandemic. [...] CBS on Sunday morning [4/5/2020] posted a video of a "nurse in tears"
who says she quit her job after she was asked to work in a Coronavirus ICU without a face mask: "America is not prepared,
and nurses are not being protected." [...] It turns out the woman is indeed a nurse, however she took time off to pursue a
blogging/'social media influencer' career. She went back to work as a nurse for ONE DAY, then quit.
Scott
Pelley Leads 60 Minutes Impeachment Coverage With Lie: "Whistleblower Under Federal Protection". CBS
Reporter Scott Pelley led the broadcast of 60-Minutes presentation of the House impeachment of Donald Trump with a stunning
claim: [Video clip] The claim is quite something. A CIA operative that needs to be put under federal
protection? Wow. Immediately CNN and the media pounced on the opportunity to promote the "whistleblower" as a
victim. [...] Except, they encountered one problem: it's not true. Scott Pelley made it up. Even one of the
lawyers for the CIA whistleblower, Mark S. Zaid, had to try and clean up CBS's false narrative: "60 Minutes
completely misinterpreted the contents of our letter."
Whistleblower's
attorney says '60 Minutes' misinterpreted letter in federal protection report. An attorney for the
whistleblower in the Trump-Ukraine scandal said Sunday [9/29/2019] that CBS' "60 Minutes" had "completely misinterpreted" a
document from his legal group, after the news outlet tweeted that the whistleblower was now under federal protection.
On Sunday night, CBS wrote on Twitter: "'60 Minutes' has obtained a letter that indicates the government whistleblower who
set off the impeachment inquiry of President Trump is under federal protection because they fear for their safety." Two
hours later, following significant reaction to the report, Attorney Mark Zaid responded: "NEWS ALERT: 60 Minutes
completely misinterpreted contents of our letter, which is now published online."
Mom Catches
CBS Using Image of Her Vaccine-Injured Child, Falsely Claiming Measles Caused It. For months now, the Free
Thought Project has been reporting on the hype and utter hysteria being pushed by the government and the media alike in
regards to the 2019 measles situation. It started in January as mainstream media and social media giants began begging
for the government to silence those who advocate for vaccine safety and it came to a head on Tuesday as New York began force
vaccinating citizens and charging those who resisted it with a crime.
CBS
Rewrites History: The Polls Weren't Wrong in 2016. CBS attempted to rewrite history on Monday with
This Morning co-host Norah O'Donnell and network Director of Elections Anthony Salvanto declaring that the polls in
2016 weren't wrong. That might be a surprise to anyone who trusted the numbers in Wisconsin, Michigan and
Pennsylvania. Helping Salvanto promote his new book on polling, O'Donnell wondered: "People said that proved that
the polls were wrong. But were they?" "No," he declared. O'Donnell cheered the revisionist history:
"Yes, thank you! Anthony, explain to everybody!" Using the benefit of hindsight, Salvanto lectured: "All the
signs were there."
Enemies of the People? The
modern era of fake news began with George W. Bush's election in 2000. In September 2004, less than two months before
the Bush-Kerry election, the high priest of fake news — Cronkite's successor, Dan Rather — aired a 60
Minutes report which contended that President Bush got into the Texas Air National Guard because of political influence
and that his officer evaluation reports gave him high marks despite his shirking of his duty. This was an obvious
attempt to damage Bush's candidacy and interfere in the election. Within hours of the report, it became entirely clear
that Rather's report was based entirely on forged documents. CBS and Rather later issued a half-apology. Such
"reports," attempting interference in elections, has become the norm for the American media and most of the world's.
I Got Your
Fake News Right Here. In the interest of transparency, and to assist CBS, I have compiled the ultimate list of
#FakeNews stories that have circulated over the last decade or two: • They told us that allowing
law-abiding citizens to carry concealed weapons would turn our streets into rivers of blood. #FakeNews •
They told us that taking trillions of dollars and giving it to those "who truly needed it" would eradicate poverty.
#FakeNews • They told us that giving home loans to those who couldn't afford them would make the
American dream achievable for all. #FakeNews • They told us that letting the federal government run
our health care system — and those of our veterans — would reduce premiums and make care accessible for
all. #FakeNews • They told us that allowing millions of unvetted third-worlders — from
gang-bangers to professional moochers — would make America safer. #FakeNews • They told us
that allowing teachers to unionize in public schools would help inner city students reach for the stars.
#FakeNews [...] • They told us that slathering welfare payments and food stamps around in record
numbers would help the economy. #FakeNews
CBS
radio report created the impression Chicago torture victim was a black man assaulted by white Trump supporters.
This may be the single most despicable act of media bias I have ever encountered. It took a lot of effort and art for
CBS Radio to put together an early report on the Chicago torture incident that was strictly factual, yet created the
impression on listeners that a group of white Trump supporters had attacked a helpless mentally challenged black man.
Mediaite provides a transcript of what was reported last Thursday morning by a top-of-the hour broadcst distributed to radio
stations across the country.
CBS Takes Spin to a New Level of Deception After Chicago
Torture Outrage. The media has been hyping a contrived narrative that since the election there has been a wave
of hate crimes against groups beloved by liberals: blacks, Muslims, sexual deviants, et cetera. Until now their
evidence has consisted mainly of hate hoaxes, but this time an appalling racially motivated crime really did occur. CBS
listeners would never guess that this crime was committed by four blacks against a white kid.
The Editor says...
In other words, the headline is misleading and deceptive.
CBS
lies about yet another police shooting. On Tuesday September 20, 2016, The Talk, on CBS showed some video of a
guy being shot by police near Tulsa OK. They showed him with his hands up, and they showed him after he was shot.
They made no mention of the fact that, after the police told him to stand still, he kept walking toward his truck. They
EDITED OUT the part of the video that showed the guy reaching into his truck, which of course is why the police shot him; he
looked like he was reaching for a gun. And of course the hostesses expressed outrage about the police shooting a guy with
his hands up and "not making any kind of threatening gesture in any way" and how it's yet another example of "blacks being killed
by racist cops." I rather doubt that the hostesses have ever heard the true story of that incident.
CBS
Misleadingly Suggests Clinton Emails Marked 'C' Not Actually 'Classified'. On CBS This Morning on Monday
[9/5/2016], at the end of a report recalling the notes the FBI released which document that Hillary Clinton claimed not to
know that "(C)" markings in her emails indicated classified information at the level of "confidential," CBS correspondent
Nancy Cordes misleadingly gave the impression that confidential emails are not classified as she made a point of correcting
Donald Trump for mis-stating that the "(C)" stood for "classified." A bit later, as House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi
appeared as a guest and similarly suggested that "confidential" information is not classified, CBS substitute host Josh
Elliott seemed to accept her claim.
CBS
Muslim Panel Accidentally Includes Professional Leftist Obama Operative. CBS's Frank Luntz sought to gauge the
attitudes of an ostensibly ordinary panel of Muslims in America towards Donald Trump. Undeclared to the audience, however, is
a professional left-wing agitator seated in the front row who is an alumnus of the Obama Administration. Linda Sarsour, an
anti-American hater of Israel, Islamic supremacist, and regular commentator on left-wing media, was not identified as such when
offering her views on Trump. Rather, she was presented as an ordinary Muslim in America.
In
LA, CBS Station Pretends There Was a Real Kwanzaa Parade Yesterday. A Kwanzaa "parade"
was held in Los Angeles yesterday [12/26/2014]. In reporting on the event, CBS Los Angeles published a work of
fiction which absolutely belongs on any 2014 list of most embarrassing moments in journalism. [...] A procession of a
few vehicles lasting 10 minutes is not a "parade." It isn't even a motorcade.
CBS
News Fabricates Story That Michigan Bill Would Allow Doctors/EMTs to Deny Treatment to Gay
Patients. CBS News published a story on December 11 under the headline: "Bill would
let Michigan doctors, EMTs refuse to treat gay patients." CBS News reports: [...] According to
Michael W. McConnell, a professor at Stanford University Law School and former federal appeals court
judge, the CBS story is false. "The exact same law has been on the books at the federal level and in
many states for almost twenty years, and no such claim has ever been made. And if it were made, it
would lose in court, probably unanimously," McConnell tells The Weekly Standard in an email.
CBS
dubs sound for quiet electric car. CBS News says an editor made an "audio error" in dubbing the sound of a
loud traditional car engine over footage of the much quieter Tesla electric car in a story that aired Sunday [3/30/2014].
CBS's Bob Schieffer
Falsely Claims 'Polls Say That Most People Favor' ObamaCare. In defiance of reality illustrated in numerous polls, on Sunday's Face the Nation,
host Bob Schieffer scolded Republican Congresswoman Marsha Blackburn when she correctly asserted "there is only partisan support" for ObamaCare. Schieffer
cut her off: "Well now Congresswoman, that's not entirely true. The polls don't suggest that. Polls say that most people favor it."
Fake News from CBS. In 2002 the
Guerilla News Network published a piece written by staffers from a group called PR Watch. They
said that "For years CBS (and all the other networks) have run fake news stories in the form of video news
releases." What's more, the article, "CBS sells fake news," went on to announce that CBS also had gone
into the business of creating, producing and distributing so-called "fake news."
'48 Hours' apologizes for altered
image. The executive producer of CBS's "48 Hours Mystery" has apologized for airing an
altered image of the front page of the Tribune in an episode about the murder trial of Ryan Ferguson
that aired Saturday night [2/18/2006].
The Atlantic
The
Media Are the Scum of the Earth. The Atlantic is a prime example of how the left-wing
echo chamber operates. They "report" a piece about a upcoming book, working hard to make sure
their fellow travelers make some cash, and declare Donald Trump has a history of praising Adolf
Hitler and his generals. Weird how this tidbit of information about the most investigate
human being on the planet escaped reporting for 4 years, but now someone finally decided to
tell it! That person is John Kelly, a retired partisan General who was fired at Trump's Chief
of Staff and has been scrambling to worm his way back into the good graces of the establishment
left ever since. Kelly started by spreading lies about Trump declaring soldiers who died in
the D-Day invasion "suckers" and "losers." He's the only person claiming this, likely the
source who "leaked" it to The Atlantic in 2020.
The
Race That No One Can Win. For a while I thought the Democrats were persecuting Trump,
believing that it would keep him in the headlines, arouse sympathy among Republicans, and lead to
the GOP nominating its weakest candidate. Now I think they just can't help themselves.
["]The Democratic and media resistance, for its part, appears readier even than in 2016 to
count Mr. Trump a would-be dictator rather than a legitimate political figure. An
edition of the Atlantic was given to the question of Mr. Trump's dictatorial
propensities. In the Washington Post Robert Kagan wrote a 6,000-word essay contending that a
second-term Mr. Trump won't be checked by countervailing institutions and so will become
America's first dictator.["] This is profoundly stupid. The president does not
have dictatorial powers, and he cannot simply announce "I am a dictator." And in any event, we have
four years of experience of Trump as president, and he was the least authoritarian of recent chief
executives. It was Barack Obama who exercised power most illegitimately by issuing illegal
executive orders.
General
Milley's Own Private Constitution. [A recent] article serves up the usual,
proclaiming Trump an existential threat to Mom and apple pie, never mind democracy, all without
details or explanation. Readers of the Atlantic just know it is true and the author,
Jeffrey Goldberg, sees no reason to expand on the idea. The real danger here is not poor
journalism (we're used to it) but the promotion of the idea that Trump is inherently dangerous and,
without men like General Milley willing to warp the Constitution, we will all die in some Trumpian
nuclear hissy fit. [...] A healthy portion of the Atlantic article details what Milley felt
was Trump's disrespect for the military (Trump's deferments but not Biden's are mentioned.) The
Atlantic's Jeffery Goldberg writes. "Milley's family venerated the military, and Trump's attitude
toward the uniformed services seemed superficial, callous, and, at the deepest human level, repugnant."
A
Cautionary Note to Antifa and BLM Thugs Contemplating "Civil War". "Civil war" has been a term much in use by
both the Left and the Right these days. Try a web search on "civil war in America 2020," and the result is
dozens/hundreds of links to commentators speculating about the "coming war between Left and Right and who will ignite the
spark" (and a lot of other related themes). The Left claim that "white supremacist and white nationalist militias" will
get things started, and the legacy media have produced dozens of articles "investigating" militias and propagating that false
narrative. One of the latest investigative reports on Oath Keepers and militias along those lines was published in the
November issue of The Atlantic. It conveys the leftwing view of militias: crazy, fringe, gun-toting elements
itching to start a civil war, and whom polite society should shun (and then disarm at the very least).
The
Atlantic gave Ruth Shalit a 'second chance' 25 years after a journalism scandal. It ended with an ugly
correction. Two weeks after publishing a long, juicy and instantly viral story about the world of competitive
niche sports and the wealthy parents who push their children to play them, the Atlantic on late Friday [10/30/2020] appended
a nearly 800-word editor's note informing readers that it was "deceived" by the story's author, Ruth Shalit Barrett. In
particular, the magazine said Barrett incorrectly asserted that the story's main character, who was identified by her middle
name (Sloane), had a son in addition to three daughters in an attempt to blur her identity, and gave a misleading and highly
exaggerated description of a fencing injury allegedly sustained by the woman's daughter. The author had described the
incident at a 2019 competition as a "massacre," in which the girl was stabbed in the neck; in the Atlantic's updated version
of the story, the injury is now portrayed as "not severe."
Atlantic
'Editor's Note' Adds New Layers To The Magazine's Unethical Journalism Standard. On Friday [10/30/2020] The
Atlantic issued what the magazine is calling an "Editor's Note." It's a strange way to spin what the note actually was:
an admission that it published a "BS" story and has a staggeringly low standard of ethics. The article, titled "The
Mad, Mad World of Niche Sports Among Ivy League-Obsessed Parents," which is set to appear in the November issue of the print
magazine, purports to explore the unhealthy dynamic of parents who push their children into niche sports accompanied by
absurd athletic regimens in order to secure elite educational opportunities through scholarships and status. The
problem is that not everyone in the story was exactly who he or she claimed to be. This shouldn't have been too
surprising for The Atlantic to learn, for the author of the piece has a record of journalistic malfeasance.
Atlantic
Issues Correction Undermining Entire Piece Promoting Tri-Parenting. The Atlantic issued a correction Thursday [9/24/2020]
to a piece published on Tuesday outlining the apparent rise in tri-parenting arrangements and chronicling the path of an asexual activist
in northern California who started a family with another married couple without dating. In an effort to normalize tri-parent
cohorts, the piece first misreported that less than half of American children were living in two-parent homes, based on a Pew Research
Center study that stated the opposite. [...] The 6-year-old study from the Pew Research Center however, showed that 46 percent of
these children were living with two heterosexual parents in their first marriage. Another 15 percent reported living in
two-parent homes where either one or both had been remarried bringing the total to 61 percent, far more than half.
The
Trump Scandal Absorption Level Has Been Reached. [Scroll down] The Atlantic story is (sputtering), "Yeah,
Trump was out there, and he said that dead soldiers, he has no respect for 'em! They're losers and suckers!" Okay, and
then that doesn't work. It looks like it might work for the first couple of days, and then here comes the exculpatory
evidence and it begins to fade. [...] Well, wait. Wait. What happened to The Atlantic story? "Oh, nothing
to see there." No, no, no! What do you mean, "Nothing to see there"? You sponsored a lie. You brought
forth a lie. You've done nothing but lie. The mainstream media and the Democrat Party has mounted one lie after
another, one allegation after another, and nothing ever comes of any of them. And yet every week, there's a new
one. As though what happened yesterday didn't happen.
Atlantic
Reporter Falsely Claims Trump Campaign Mocked Biden At Beau's Grave. Vice President Joe Biden once again dodged
questions from the press Sunday, walking from Mass to his motorcade while a pool reporter yelled "Mr. Vice President,
come back to us!" Biden dodging media interactions is not surprising, even if it is very strange for a modern political
campaign. What is unusual are some of the people who are defending his dodging of reporters and difficult questions,
among them The Atlantic's Edward-Isaac Dovere, who claimed Biden was visiting his son's grave and shamed the President Donald
Trump's campaign for criticizing Biden. Worse still than flacking for Biden when he is supposed to be reporting on his
campaign, is that there's no evidence Dovere's version of events happened at all.
Dan
Rather tries a variation on "fake but accurate". Jeffrey Goldberg's claim that President Trump disparaged
American soldiers who died in Normandy is collapsing. [...] Dan Rather inadvertently provides further evidence that
Goldberg's claim is falling apart. Earlier, as we noted, Rather tweeted that the story had seemingly been "confirmed"
by other sources. Now, Rather is falling back on a variation of "fake but accurate" — the "defense" of
Rather's 2004 story about George W. Bush's military service. "Whether [Trump] said it or not, it is believable," Rather
told callers to a show he was hosting. Later, Rather cited the "terrible things" Trump said about Senator John McCain.
But Trump had a beef with McCain, whom he regarded as a rival and then a foe. Trump often disparages rivals and foes.
There is no pattern of him disparaging bystanders, much less brave soldiers who have been dead for many decades. In any case,
the standard in journalism shouldn't be whether a story is believable, but whether it is supported by non-fabricated evidence.
Journalism Is Dead. [Scroll down] Last
week the Atlantic, the magazine that represents the last refuge of goody-goody Liberalism in America, published an
assault on Donald Trump. After years of claims that he has, among other things, colluded with the Russians, boasted of
touching women where they go to the bathroom, and other claims that have all been refuted, the Atlantic has settled on
a new charge. The president has disparaged our World War I dead. Moreover, he did it two years ago. Yes,
the fact-checkers at the Atlantic have spent two years verifying the factuality of this story so they could get it
just right. And now it is ready to see the light of day just weeks before the election. It was close, but they
made it.
The Biden Slime Operation.
In terms of political ethics and tactics, the Democrats have hit rock bottom. The Atlantic has worked hard to
become a third-rate New Yorker in terms both of literary quality and the vitriol of its hatred for President Trump;
the magazine has probably confirmed its position with the confection of the uncorroborated and totally implausible allegation
that Trump disparaged American World War I veterans who died in France as "suckers" and "losers." It is impossible
that any such statement was made by him. He is a proud graduate of the New York Military Academy, and while he was happy
to invoke a minor bone-chip in his foot as reason enough not to enter the military during the Vietnam era, that does not
disqualify him as an admirer and supporter of the U.S. Armed Forces.
Pre-Election
Dirty Tricks: Ignore, Refute, or Pivot? It sounds unlikely but the most appalling instance of
journalistic malpractice last week was not when The Atlantic published anonymous allegations that President Trump
disparaged American troops behind closed doors — it was Joe Biden's so-called press conference following another
shaky, rambling, and dishonest speech disguised as a "campaign event." Rather than jump at the chance to grill the
Democratic nominee for president after weeks of his refusing to take questions with no objection from the press, reporters
delicately pitched one softball after another to the frail candidate. Biden opened the event with a direct reference to
The Atlantic article. "If what is written in The Atlantic is true, it's disgusting," Biden fumed.
"It affirms what most of us believe to be true, that Donald Trump is not fit to do the job of president, to be the commander
in chief." The gaggle in attendance eagerly took his cue. The first "question" [...] went to a scribe from none
other than The Atlantic, who prompted Biden to opine about the "president's soul and the life he leads." Follow-up
teasers opened the door for Biden to rant about QAnon, face coverings, Attorney General William Barr, and mail-in voting.
3
Crucial Breakdowns In Journalistic Standards That Explain The Atlantic's Trump Political Hit Piece. For
Washington staffers and politicos, a day off on Monday creeps into a half-day on Friday ("to beat the traffic"), which seeps
into an early Thursday ("packing for the trip"). Among this sizable set of folks stretching from the Hill to its
consultants to their non-profits, Labor Day is half-sacred. The lazy, end-of-summer weekend away took a broadside
Thursday night, however, when The Atlantic's Jeffrey Goldberg published a badly sourced, difficult-to-confirm,
belief-stretching story about President Donald Trump denigrating America's honored dead at Belleau Woods, France. The
political motivation of the accusations was laid bare by early Friday morning when MSNBC debuted a political attack ad based
on the piece that was prepared in a deeply suspicious record time. The trap was set — and poor adherence to
journalistic practices made it all possible. Throughout the long weekend, skeptical journalists cast serious doubts on
the Goldberg's standards and methods, and on what passes today as "confirmation," but for those outside the media industry
it's a he-said-she-said with potentially serious political consequences for the president.
Keep Your Dirty
Keyboard Paws Off My President. [Scroll down] And now the latest, that Trump berated our brave and heroic
fallen. They sat on this supposed "bombshell" for two years. Only now it becomes news? How does one
defend by proving a negative? If someone says that, as this article was being written, the author was cursing Jews, how
does this rabbi prove it a lie? John Bolton, who hates Trump deeply, nonetheless says it never happened. Trump
and Bolton and others remember the day and the warnings and advice the president was given that the skies were too foggy for
his helicopter to travel. [...] One looks at Trump's record on the military and on veterans' affairs, his focused commitment
and fulfillment of his promise to rebuild the military, to markedly increase military pay, to transmogrify the Bureau of
Veterans Affairs and to get our veterans the best health care available. Did he denigrate our fallen soldiers? If
he did, in private and while behind closed doors — and all direct in-person evidence says he did not —
does it even matter with a four-year presidential record like his? And it is hard to believe, if not impossible.
US
Army vet says he was used as a 'prop' in anti-Trump 'propaganda'. One U.S. wounded veteran is speaking out
against his image being used across all social media platforms to further perpetuate a story he believes is false and made up
by Democrats for political gain. "I'm just so irritated that they put my image up there because now it looks like the
president called me a loser." Bobby Henline, a four-tour Iraq War veteran told Fox News referring to comments allegedly made
by the president regarding wounded veterans. "And they're using that to sell something that they believe in for their
agenda. It's not fair to put us [veterans] as props in the middle of all that[.]"
How the Atlantic twisted the truth. The Atlantic
has stunk up an otherwise beautiful Labor Day weekend with a uniquely ugly story. Anti-Trump editor-in-chief Jeffrey
Goldberg claims that Donald Trump snubbed a World War One American cemetery in France because 'it's filled with losers', and
the Doughboys buried there are 'suckers'. Goldberg also asserts that 'Trump rejected the idea of the visit because he feared
his hair would become disheveled in the rain' on November 10, 2018. [...] Goldberg cites 'four people with firsthand
knowledge of the discussion that day' — all anonymous. In contrast, at least 11 named members of Trump's
Paris team corroborate him. So does an email from an unidentified military aide. So do the weather data.
Trump's next-day agenda also discredits the Atlantic.
Atlantic
Editor Admits Key Detail of Anti-Trump Hit Piece May Be Untrue. Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor-in-chief of The
Atlantic, admitted that a key detail of his article about Trump could be wrong during an interview with CNN on Sunday
[9/6/2020]. [...] At least fifteen Trump administration officials who were with Trump on that trip have now disputed the
Atlantic report, including former national security adviser John Bolton. FOIA documents have also definitively proved
that Trump's visit to the cemetery was canceled due to weather. When Goldberg was asked about evidence that the
cancelation was due to inclement weather, he admitted that it was likely true. "I'm sure all of those things are
true," he told CNN.
The
Atlantic Hoax is Dead — Bring on the Next Hoax! The Atlantic's "Trump hates the military" hoax died
on the vine after about a 24-hour run. It died for the simple reason that Trump's public actions consistently in favor
of the interests of the U.S. military and its personnel and retirees rendered the anonymously-sourced hit piece transparently
unbelievable to anyone with functioning synapses in their cranial cavity, which of course excludes China Joe Biden. The
obvious hope of the Biden/Harris campaign and its corrupt media toadies was that this particular hoax would lead thousands of
Trump supporters to finally abandon him out of disgust. Yeah, that's not going to happen.
Desperately Derailing
Donald. [Scroll down] The point is, in Jussie Smollett fashion, the demand for scandals is outrunning the
supply and time grows short. It's no wonder that one of Joe Biden's largest campaign contributors, billionaire Laurene
Jobs of the Apple fortune, who owns most of The Atlantic, had the former Obama Administration megaphone Jeffrey
Goldberg exhume a two-year-old and long-ago-refuted charge that President Trump did not wish to visit a U.S. military
cemetery in France because he variously was afraid of the rain, that he would get his hair wet, and that he did not wish to
celebrate "losers" and "suckers." All this was from a left-wing media that not long ago damned a "militaristic" Trump for
being infatuated with generals, and putting far too many in his White House, while needlessly spending billions on manpower
and equipment to repair a military hollowed out by the Obama Administration. The resuscitated scandal hit-piece was
primed for all the left-wing cable news shows and supposedly would dominate the otherwise quiet Labor Day weekend news.
The problem was that the charge was calcified — and for a reason. Security memos long ago had shown that the
weather, not Trump, had deterred low-flying presidential helicopters.
'This
Never Happened': Sources Close To Trump Rally To His Defense Over Atlantic Story. President Donald Trump was
quick to deny a recent report from The Atlantic, which alleged that he had said a number of disrespectful things about fallen
American service members — and in the days that followed, a number of others have gone on record to support
him. Trump claimed that the story had been invented to help The Atlantic "gain some relevance." [...] First Lady
Melania Trump made a rare public statement as well, saying that the story was "not true" and adding, "It has become a very
dangerous time when anonymous sources are believed above all else, & no one knows their motivation. This is not
journalism — It is activism. And it is a disservice to the people of our great nation."
The
Stunning Synergy of The Atlantic's Anonymous Attack on Trump. The Atlantic published a story Thursday evening
[9/3/2020] that claimed President Donald Trump called the fallen American soldiers in a World War I cemetery "suckers" and
"losers" in 2018. The author, Jeffrey Goldberg, cited four anonymous sources. Nearly a dozen current and former Trump
administration officials disputed the story. One, notably, was John Bolton, the former national security adviser who
says he will not vote for Trump. "I was there," he said, and "I didn't hear that."
Zach
Fuentes, Top Aide to John Kelly, Denies Atlantic Story About Trump. Former Deputy White House Chief of Staff
Zach Fuentes denied to Breitbart News The Atlantic's account of President Donald Trump's comments about troops in
Europe. Fuentes unequivocally denied The Atlantic's report last week, a huge blow to the establishment media
narrative. Fuentes personally briefed President Trump on the weather situation that led to the trip being
canceled. He is also a close personal confidante of former White House Chief of Staff John Kelly.
Left-Wing
Media Have Jumped the Shark. Instead of reporting on real issues, the media are running wild with the latest
Trump attack piece in the far-left magazine, The Atlantic. It is owned by liberals, managed by liberals, staffed by
liberals, and read by liberals. Despite the bias, the media are now treating The Atlantic as a paragon of
objective journalism. Of course, The Atlantic article was pure garbage, filled with anonymous sources, spouting
an anti-Trump message right before an election. The aim of the article was strictly to harm the president's re-election
prospects. In contrast, numerous people from the Trump White House have gone on the record to vehemently deny the
salacious accusations in the article. For real journalists, public denials should outweigh anonymous accusations, but,
alas, they are extinct. The ridiculous theme of the article was that the president hated the military and those who
have been wounded and killed in combat. Such an accusation is preposterous. Instead, the president has given our
military service members a massive pay raise, reformed the Veterans Administration, and totally rebuilt our national defenses.
U.S.
Ambassador to France Denies The Atlantic Story. U.S. Ambassador to France and Monaco Jamie McCourt told
Breitbart News exclusively on Monday [9/7/2020] that the Atlantic story about President Donald Trump allegedly bashing
troops is untrue. Ambassador McCourt was there the day President Trump's team called off the trip to the cemetery at
Belleau Wood because of inclement weather. She is the latest U.S. official who was actually present at the event to
publicly deny the Atlantic's account of events, which is based entirely on anonymous sources.
Sharyl
Attkisson Warns: Prepare for the 'Scheduled Scandals' Dropping Before November. If anyone was surprised
by the nonsensical lie being pushed by The Atlantic, they shouldn't have been. The story, from "anonymous sources"
claimed that President Donald Trump didn't want to visit an American cemetery in France because he said dead military members
"losers" and "suckers." Anyone reading that would know it was fake and it was immediately debunked from all quarters by
people willing to go on the record. But it sounded a lot more like the offensive way that the left depicts the
military. The fact that such an obviously false story would be pushed shows how desperate they are at this point.
It's also pretty clear that one big font of support for the president and the GOP in general is the military.
Consequently, Democrats have to find some way to unhinge that support. It's 60 days before the election.
Democrats and their willing acolytes in the media have already shown that they are willing to do anything they possibly can
to win back the White House.
Shades
of Dan Rather in Jeffrey Goldberg's Anti-Trump Hit Piece. Should we believe the story, reported by the
Atlantic's editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg, that President Trump made disparaging comments about American soldiers who died
in Normandy? I don't. Trump has a very nasty side, but I doubt he made the nasty comments Goldberg's attributes
to him. For one thing, it's not Trump's practice to disparage people who haven't disparaged him. Sure, he
expressed a lack of respect for John McCain's war heroism. But that was because McCain was a political enemy.
Trump has no beef with soldiers who died in Normandy many decades ago. Moreover, John Bolton, who was present when
Trump supposedly made his disparaging comments, says it didn't happen.
Evidence
piles up that the phony Atlantic story about Trump and troops was a slime job to boost Biden. To get a sense of
how low the Biden campaign is going to go in its quest to oust President Trump, the Atlantic hit job from Thursday is a
pretty good indicator. The evidence is piling up that the easily refutable, anonymously sourced so-called story,
claiming that President Trump disparaged veterans, wasn't really an Atlantic news story at all; it was a coordinated hit job
involving the press, Democratic operatives, and associated leftist groups connected to the military, executed with impeccable
timing. The Atlantic is building a name for itself for its uncorrected false stories, and this one's not at all different.
Did
Pro-Biden Vet Group Collude With The Atlantic Or Anonymous White House Sources To Release Anti-Trump Ad?
[Scroll down] Shortly after publication, The Atlantic's anonymously-sourced reporting was making viral rounds on the
internet and provoked immediate reactions from well-organized rapid-response teams from all corners of the political
arena. True to form, Democrats and legacy media predictably latched onto the latest accusations built entirely on
secret sources as an illustration of the president's corrupt character, highlighting previous public comments on McCain as
evidence to support The Atlantic's credibility relying on anonymous insiders. The White House on the other hand,
vehemently denied Thursday's allegations while conservatives called out The Atlantic's flouting of journalistic values of
transparency publishing what could have very well been made up. After all, The Atlantic did just that in July, and
refused to correct the record for days after it got caught.
Anatomy
of A(nother) Fake Scandal. The Atlantic published a tale based on anonymous sources that the President
referred to veterans who had lost their lives in battles as "suckers" and losers" and refused to go to a French cemetery
honoring WWI American veterans because he feared his hair would be mussed. The magazine is now majority owned by Steve
Jobs's very rich widow, Laurene, who contributed $500,000 to the Biden campaign and who seems to have reshaped it as the
Biden sleazy propaganda arm. It previously published a pro-defund the police article — supposedly a
firsthand account of witnessing a police officer shoot an unarmed youngster for ignoring a basketball sign-in
sheet — which, as the extensive Federalist investigation showed, was utter poppycock. While the
Atlantic was the ringleader, the usual media wizards copied and pasted the unsupported claims by Jeffrey Goldberg and
megaphoned them. Sean Davis of the Federalist noted the series of fake scandals promoted by the same journalists
"who bought and peddled the Iraq WMD hoax, the Rolling Stone UVA rape hoax, the Russian collusion hoax, the Covington
Kids hoax, the Kavanaugh hoax, and the latest Atlantic hoax."
The
Leftist Atlantic Behind the Garbage Military Hit Piece on Trump — Is Owned by a Joe Biden Mega-Donor. On
Thursday [9/3/2020] The Atlantic website published a garbage hit piece on President Donald Trump and his alleged hatred of
the military and US veterans. President Trump has done more for the US military than any president in decades. Trump
is also the first president in decades who DID NOT start any new wars or send American soldiers into conflict with unwinnable and
dangerous restrictions. The garbage hit piece also comes as President Trump continues to surge in the polls following the amazing
RNC convention and the continued leftist riots across the country. The liberal media and FOX News have been pushing this article
that is based entirely on alleged anonymous sources.
The
nefarious purpose behind The Atlantic's 'Trump and the military' hoax. On Thursday [9/3/2020], The
Atlantic published an article that used anonymous sources to claim that President Trump repeatedly disparaged American
troops, both living and dead. By Friday morning, Democrats were weaponizing the article to cover for Biden's serious
problems with the military: His support for the Iraq War, and the way the Obama administration weakened the
military. Trump, however, revitalized the military and fought for the troops. The article's primary allegations
are that Trump refused to visit a WWI cemetery because of his hair, said the Marines who died taking Belleau Wood were
"suckers" and "losers," and drew back in revulsion from troops who lost limbs. Every assertion is false.
People with first-hand information who were willing to go on the record exposed how terribly The Atlantic lied about
Trump. John Bolton, a Trump foe, was clear. "I was there," he said, about the decision to cancel the Belleau Wood
trip, and "I didn't hear that." Contemporaneous documents support Bolton, but The Atlantic ignored them.
WH's
Kayleigh McEnany Wipes the Floor with The Atlantic Over 'Fake News' 'Propaganda'. On Friday afternoon
[9/4/2020], White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany continued the full court press from the Trump administration and
campaign to debunk, deny, and dispose of Thursday's Atlantic hit piece against President Trump from liberal hack
editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg, calling it "conspiracy-laden propaganda" and "fake news" that abandoned "all journalistic
integrity." And in a true mic drop moment, McEnany read the roughly four-minute statement and left the podium without
taking questions.
The
Latest Garbage Hit Piece On Trump Begins to Fall Apart as Verifiable Counter Evidence Emerges. The story
alleged that the President had slandered dead marines as "losers" and that he didn't want wounded veterans at his military
parade. As I wrote in my original piece, this story is obviously nonsense. Trump has always made it a habit to
laud the military, including those that have lost limbs or died. Any disagreements he's had with military members have
always centered on politics, usually involving someone attacking him first. One can argue the wisdom of some of his
counter-attacks, but there's no evidence Trump has ever held animosity towards those in the military. In fact, there's
plenty of evidence to the contrary.
McCain
son-in-law defends Trump, as pressure builds for The Atlantic to give up its sources. Pressure is building on
the alleged anonymous sources to identify themselves after claiming to The Atlantic that President Donald Trump savaged the
late Sen. John McCain and fallen World War I soldiers. In a report published Thursday [9/3/2020] that was written
by the magazine's Left-wing editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg, the sources claim the president canceled a visit in 2018 to a
World War I cemetery where American dead were buried because the trip would mess his hair up. He also allegedly
disparaged the soldiers and Marines buried there as "losers" and "suckers" — descriptions of American dead that
seem wholly out of character for a president who has gone out of his way to thank, praise, and take care of the U.S. military.
Biden
Megadonor Owns The Atlantic, Reportedly Communicates Often With Journalist Behind Anonymously-Sourced Trump
Bombshell. The Atlantic's majority owner has donated over $1.2 million to Democratic candidates and political
committees since 2019 while reportedly keeping in close contact with the magazine's editor-in-chief, who published an
anonymously-sourced story Thursday alleging that President Donald Trump denigrated fallen American soldiers.
Billionaire philanthropist Laurene Powell Jobs, the widow of former Apple CEO Steve Jobs, obtained a 70% stake in The
Atlantic in 2017 through her firm, the Emerson Collective. In November, she further solidified her control over the
magazine after its longtime chairman, David Bradley, said he was going to step away from management, according to Politico.
Here's
How We Know The Atlantic's Hit Piece on Trump Is Pure Fiction. A report published Thursday by The Atlantic
cited anonymous sources claiming that President Donald Trump didn't want to visit the Aisne-Marne American Cemetery near
Paris in 2018 because the troops there who died in battle were "losers" and "suckers. The media has largely reported on
this story as though it were true or at least likely to be true. "The Atlantic Magazine is dying, like most magazines,
so they make up a fake story in order to gain some relevance," Trump tweeted on Friday. "Story already refuted, but
this is what we are up against. Just like the Fake Dossier. You fight and fight, and then people realize it was a
total fraud!" Even CNN's Brian Stelter seemed to acknowledge that the claims of anonymous sources aren't as convincing.
Coincidence?
Hours After The Atlantic's Hit Piece on Trump Came a Pre-Produced Commercial. The "story" in The Atlantic about
President Trump derisively speaking of fallen U.S. troops has been widely debunked by people who were actually there, as my
PJ Media colleague Matt Margolis writes, and now there's even more reason to doubt its veracity. Within hours of The
Atlantic's hit piece on Trump, there was a far-Left "Vote Vets" commercial on the air about it and a question about the Atlantic
story was the first one asked at a Joe Biden campaign presser. [...] [I]t's as if they were working together or something.
Trump-Hater
John Bolton Debunks Anonymous Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump's Veterans Record. Fired former National Security
Advisor John Bolton, who released an anti-Trump book earlier this year that sought to offer one last breath into the
Democrats' February impeachment hopes, debunked The Atlantic hit piece published Thursday. The magazine's story relied
entirely on anonymous sources to charge the president with making disparaging remarks on WWI veterans. Thursday night
[9/3/2020], Atlantic Editor in Chief Jeffrey Goldberg offered new allegations on why the president didn't visit the graves of
fallen WWI soldiers on a 2018 trip to France, which the White House has continued to claim was due to inclement weather.
John
Bolton Rejects Atlantic Story: 'I Was There'; 'I Didn't Hear That'. Former National Security Advisor John
Bolton has disputed a story in The Atlantic claiming that President Donald Trump called fallen World War I soldiers
"losers." Bolton told the New York Times Friday [9/4/2020] that "I was there" and "I didn't hear that." The
Atlantic's Jeffrey Goldberg published an article titled "Trump: Americans Who Died in War Are 'Losers' and
'Suckers'." The story also claimed that Trump skipped a 2018 visit to the Aisne-Marne American Cemetery near Paris, where
the fallen of the battle of Belleau Wood are buried, because he feared rain would ruin his hair. Goldberg's sources were
all anonymous.
The
Unraveling Narrative Behind The Atlantic's Defund-The-Police 'Shooting' Tale. When social justice activist and
lawyer Derecka Purnell was just 12 years old, she and her sister watched a police officer shoot a young boy in a city
recreation center because he had ignored the basketball sign-in sheet. This jarring, emotional, and deeply unsettling
story was published July 6 at The Atlantic, in the section reserved for ideas, under the bold, attention-grabbing headline,
"How I Became a Police Abolitionist." Purnell's deeply personal story of shattered innocence and shattered bones at the
end of a policeman's gun was shared widely among top journalists and activists. "I started her article thinking
abolition was impossible and ending thinking it must happen," the president of a social justice think tank at Harvard wrote
on Twitter, quoting his mother. "This is a beautifully written piece," the Atlantic's constitutional law editor
agreed. "Derecka is the future," an activist journalism executive declared. There's a major problem with
Purnell's story, however. Based on a Federalist investigation of newspaper archives and the police department records,
and questions to The Atlantic, the police union, and the office of the mayor, it does not appear to have ever happened.
The
Atlantic Must Stop Covering For The Chinese Communist Party. The Chinese Communist Party does not want to be
held responsible as the source or for the spread of COVID-19, also rightfully known as the Wuhan virus. This is
entirely unsurprising for an authoritarian regime that has long deployed propaganda and manipulation. What is
surprising, and alarming for Americans, is that the U.S. publication The Atlantic would adopt China's anti-American
disinformation efforts. Since the outbreak began in Wuhan in early January, Chinese officials have concealed
information about the spread of the virus, silenced and punished Chinese doctors who tried to warn others, ordered the
destruction of lab evidence, and claimed the virus originated in the United States. Instead of investigating or writing
about China's propaganda machine working in real time as we watch the virus rapidly spread across the globe, journalists at
The Atlantic are more interested in writing their own pro-China, anti-American virus hot takes.
Trump,
racism, and the media's obsession. If it weren't for their sick obsession with race, the national media would
have next to nothing to talk about. The October issue of The Atlantic magazine features a long essay by Ta-Nehisi
Coates on President Trump being "The First White President," a lament about the shame Americans should feel in electing a
white man after a black one. It's been heralded by Coates' media peers as a "blockbuster" and something to "admire,"
since it goes on and on about racism and nothing else. Legitimate reasons voters had for choosing Trump are legion (the
suffocating politically-correct culture, immigration, Hillary Clinton's laugh) but Coates chalked up the entire 2016
outcome to white racists and Trump's whole agenda to bigotry.
Magazine
Retracts Claim That Fetal Heartbeats Are 'Imaginary'. One of Washington's most influential magazines published
several updates to an error-filled article attacking ultrasound technology, without acknowledging the extent of those
corrections. The Atlantic published "How the Ultrasound Pushed the Idea That a Fetus Is a Person" on Tuesday
[1/24/2017]. The 2,500-word article argued that ultrasound technology "has been used to create an imaginary 'heartbeat'
and sped-up videos that falsely depict a response to stimulus." The article by Moira Weigel, a Yale doctoral candidate
in comparative literature, included at least three major errors that the publication corrected.
Abortion
Science: Heartbeats Are Imaginary, Unborn Babies Aren't Alive, And Ultrasounds Are Just Tools Of The Patriarchy. The
abortion industry has a new enemy: ultrasounds. In a bizarre and rambling 2,600-word feature piece published on Tuesday [1/24/2017],
The Atlantic writer Moira Weigel took a sledgehammer to basic science and then did her best to vacuum its brains out before anyone could
figure out what just happened. The article's headline is bad enough — "How the Ultrasound Pushed the Idea That a Fetus Is a
Person" — but its subhed is the real work of art: "The technology has been used to create an 'imaginary' heartbeat and sped-up
videos that falsely depict a response to stimulus." There are numerous other gems throughout the piece, such as her implication that only
male doctors are allowed to use ultrasounds.
National Public Radio
NPR's
Nina Totenberg: 'Leading theory' is conservative clerk leaked abortion opinion. One of the Supreme Court's
longtime reporters said the "leading theory" is that a conservative clerk leaked the majority draft opinion indicating the
high court is poised to overturn Roe v. Wade. Nina Totenberg, a legal affairs correspondent for NPR,
said the only theory that makes sense is that the leak came from someone who "was afraid that this majority might not hold."
NPR's
infamously wrong Nina Totenberg: It 'makes sense' Supreme Court leaker [would be] a 'conservative clerk'.
In a display of mudslinging disguised as journalism, one NPR reporter maintained her track record of laying unsubstantiated
claims related to the Supreme Court when she dismissed any other possible origin for the SCOTUS leak other then a
"conservative clerk who was afraid." NPR's legal affairs correspondent Nina Totenberg appeared on ABC's "This Week"
Sunday where she was asked to assess the situation surrounding the release of Justice Samuel Alito's draft majority opinion
for the case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. Host Martha Raddatz brought her guest into the
segment by commenting on the lengthy duration for which Totenberg has covered SCOTUS.
Here are the
Most Egregious Fake News Stories of 2018. [#21] NPR: Donald Trump Jr. committed perjury: NPR published a
report in November insisting that Donald Trump Jr. lied to Congress about efforts to build a Trump Tower in Moscow because
his statements conflicted with those of former Trump attorney Michael Cohen. However, NPR failed to realize that the
piece of Trump Jr.'s testimony they quoted was about a different project.
NPR
Blatantly Lies About Donald Trump Jr.'s 2017 Senate Testimony. NPR falsely claimed that Donald Trump Jr.'s
testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee in September 2017 conflicted with an account given by a former attorney for
President Donald Trump. [...] In fact, Senate investigators were asking Trump Jr. about a series of efforts to develop
property in Russia, going back several years. Reporter Phil Ewing (reporter Tim Mak contributed to the story) conflates
one of those efforts with another separate effort. That conflation results in the false news report.
Donald
Trump Jr Responds to NPR Finally Retracting False Story About Him. In another example of why Americans
increasingly distrust the establishment media to present factually sound, unbiased news, NPR published a report Friday
claiming that Donald Trump Jr.'s testimony to Congress conflicted with the current claims of Michael Cohen about the "Moscow
Trump Tower" deal discussions taking place in 2016. After a number of reporters from various outlets called out NPR for
reporting what was a verifiably false claim, the network finally issued a correction and deleted its original tweet —
but not before the false report had permeated social media and made its way to CNN.
When
The Truth Gets In The Way. [Scroll down] NPR hadn't bothered to check the whole transcript in the
research, writing, or editing phases of their "reporting," and neither did any of the so-called journalists who'd help spread
the fake story once it broke. It fit perfectly with the liberal narrative of the Trump family bring Russian
puppets — no fact-checking was necessary, it had to be true because they'd wished for it be. But the note
should have been a complete retraction, as the entire premise of the story was wrong. Everyone who read it in that
5-hour window, before the "note" was added, was lied to and believed that lie, likely spreading that lie to others to this
day. The lie always beats the truth with people who desperately want to believe it.
Mass
stabbing at Idaho apartment complex leaves 9 injured, suspect in custody, police say. Nine people, including
six children, were injured in a mass stabbing in an apartment complex in Boise, Idaho, on Saturday night, with four of the
victims reported to be in critical condition, officials said. The Ada County Sheriff's Office told Fox News on Sunday
[7/1/2018] 30-year-old Timmy Earl Kinner of Los Angeles has been arrested in connection with the attack. Kinner has
been charged with 9 counts of battery-aggravated assault, and 6 counts of injury to a child, according to jail records.
Fake
news from Trump-hating NPR Update: NPR says it was fake. Taxpayer-subsidized National Public Radio is as
shameless as CNN in its efforts to blame President Trump or his supporters for everything bad that happens. Why wait
for facts when the narrative was so blindingly obvious in the case of a stabbing attack on refugees in... Boise, Idaho? [...]
So why would NPR leap to the conclusion that a Trump-supporter was the perp? Everyone at all the best cocktail parties
in Washington, D.C. knows that Idaho is populated by white racists, holdouts against the new emerging nonwhite majority of
America, who have retreated to Whitetopia, as NPR itself instructed us.
NPR
Bungles Sea Level Rise Story (supposed threats to coastal military installations ignore science). National
Public Radio's March 31 "Morning Edition" program carried a "news" story claiming that rising seas threaten a number of U.S.
coastal military bases. The commentary was so laden with factual errors that listeners might have thought it was an
early April fool's joke. Unfortunately, it was not. NPR remains so wedded to its belief that humans and carbon
dioxide emissions are causing a fossil fuels-driven global warming catastrophe that its reporting has been compromised, and
it is unable to think critically or report honestly without resorting to activist claims and fake news events. Real
journalism would have at least included passing references to alternative views and sources. But they were absent in
this story, which in truth is a splendid example of ignorance or deception — reader's choice.
MSNBC
MSNBC's
'Interview' of Harris Shows How Left-Wing Media Are Treating Election as Coronation.
Vice President Kamala Harris completed her second whole interview of her mostly cloistered
presidential campaign Wednesday night. Frankly, it was an embarrassment for American
corporate media and gives the lie to the idea that the Harris campaign is all about defending
"democracy." The interview was exactly what one would expect if you'd followed the Harris
campaign at all. It was a series of mostly softball questions, delivered in the friendliest
of confines on left-wing MSNBC, conducted by an admiring and sycophantic host, Stephanie
Ruhle. That setup was practically telegraphed ahead of time. Five days before the
interview, Ruhle went on HBO's "Real Time With Bill Maher" and claimed that Harris didn't have to
answer any substantive questions from the media. "Kamala Harris isn't running for perfect,"
Ruhle heatedly told the New York Times' Bret Stephens, another guest on the program.
MSNBC
Lets the Biden Cat out of the Bag. Morning Joe, or "Morning Joke" as I like to refer
to it as, is a propaganda arm for the Democrat party. But then again, so is CNN, network
news, and increasingly more often, Fox News. They are no longer even pretending to be
apolitical or objective, like how the left still pretends that men can become pregnant.
Morning Joe hit that mark this past week. [...] On last Thursday's show, Mika opined, "The Dems
need to get it together. They really need to get whatever they've got going, going.
Whatever it is, the problem should not be our candidate. The focus should be on Donald
Trump[.]" Our candidate? Joe and Mika's candidate? Or MSNBC's candidate? No
surprise but there it is. If Biden is their candidate, is their show considered a campaign
contribution to the Biden/Harris campaign? Why should the focus be on Trump? Biden has
been in charge for the past four years.
To
Call Them Journalists Is A Misnomer. MSNBC took an interesting step on Monday morning.
They pulled their premier program, Morning Joe because they feared the hosts or guests would say something
inflammatory about Trump or the shooting in Pennsylvania. Management of these networks understands the
Danger of the vile rhetoric spewed daily by their "journalists." These people do not deserve the title.
Whether on a news or opinion show, they are partisan arms of the Democrat Party. They hate Trump.
Republicans, the Conservative movement, and most of all, America and they are not afraid to prove it.
It's
Long Past Time for MSNBC to Fire Joy Reid. Joy Reid's descent into madness has been
well-chronicled on MSNBC, but her latest comments suggesting the assassination attempt against
Donald Trump was staged should be the final straw that earns her a pink slip from the
network. Reid, aside from lacking talent outright, is now a danger to the public discourse
due to her lead role as a BlueAnon conspiracy theorist. Earlier in the week, she accused
Trump of using the attempt on his life as a "photo op." "Donald Trump is an elderly man who,
for whatever reason, was given nine seconds to take an iconic photo-op during an active shooter
situation," she declared. Yes, of course. Because it seems likely that a man who just
had his head nearly blown off thoughtfully crafted a plan to gather the Secret Service around him
in the hopes that a photographer was snapping away. Reid then tried to convince her followers
that the GOP candidate didn't actually get shot.
Joy
Reid Is Saying Trump Was Never Hit By A Bullet And His Secret Service Detail Actually Killed Two
People. Joy Reid of MSNBC is now suggesting that Donald Trump was never hit by a
bullet, and that his campaign and the Secret Service colluded to kill two people in a fake
assassination attempt just so Trump could have a photo op. Outrageous. Insane.
Defamatory. NBC must take Reid off the air, and Donald Trump should sue her, immediately.
[Video clip]
MSNBC
Did Not Show 'a Single Second of the Gold Star Families' at the RNC. The MSNBC
broadcast cut away and showed no second of the Gold Families at the RNC. How do they live with
themselves? That's a rhetorical question. Biden's disastrous Afghanistan withdrawal led
to the deaths of 13 Marines. All of the families want Biden gone. That interferes with
MSNBC's agenda, which is more important than honoring the heroes. [Tweet]
MSNBC's
Joy Reid Suggests Biden Surviving COVID is the Same as Trump Surviving an Assassination Attempt.
Joy Reid of MSNBC is either incredibly desperate or completely insane. Maybe both.
Today, Reid suggested that if Biden survives his current case of COVID, that it's just like Trump
surviving an assassination attempt where someone nearly blew his brains out with a gun. Are
the people who run MSNBC capable of feeling shame or embarrassment?
MSNBC
Pushes Debunked Conspiracy Theory that Trump Wasn't Shot. Despite the graphic
photographic evidence from different angles showing former President Trump was missing chunks of
his right ear after being shot in the head during a failed assassination attempt over the weekend,
MSNBC host Michael Steele wasted oxygen during the network's coverage of Night Two of the
Republican National Convention on Tuesday to spew debunked fringe conspiracy theories claiming
Trump wasn't actually hit by a bullet. "Where I am at this point, it's been three days, going
on four... and yet, we have not received a medical report from the hospital nor have we received a
medical report from the campaign or from the Trump organization about the extent of the damage to
his ear," he decried. Steele, who's not a ballistics expert nor was he pro-gun rights in any
meaningful way, bloviated about how "If he was shot by a high-caliber bullet, there should probably
be very little ear there. And so we would like to know that."
The Editor says...
This is an example of ultracrepidarianism: The man is offering opinions on a subject well beyond his area of
expertise, whatever that area may be. Nobody owes this man a "medical report" on Trump's injuries.
The Editor says...
Why wait til the last minute? Go ahead and quit now!
MSNBC
pulls 'Morning Joe' from air Monday reportedly over concerns about Trump assassination attempt
commentary. MSNBC nixed broadcasting its "Morning Joe" program Monday due to concerns
about possible inappropriate commentary in the wake of Saturday's assassination attempt against
former President Donald Trump, CNN reported. MSNBC's focus Monday is breaking news coverage
of the shooting at Trump's rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, CNN said, adding that "Morning Joe" will
be back on the air Tuesday. CNN, citing an individual familiar with the matter, said MSNBC
made the move to prevent the possibility of inappropriate commentary on "Morning Joe" that could
hurt the progressive cable news network. Instead, the individual told CNN, breaking news
coverage would air.
MSNBC
Host Calls For Biden Aides To Be Allowed ON STAGE With Him At Next Debate. MSNBC host
Lawrence O'Donnell has called for allowing Joe Biden to have aides with him on stage to speak for
him and help him sound coherent. Yes, really. This is where we are now. O'Donnell
said that it would be good to "Allow the candidates to have as many staff as they want, join them
on the stage throughout the debate, and make sure that all of them have microphones." He added
that "the candidates should be allowed to turn to their staff and confer with them about anything
at any time in the debate." "And we should be able to hear everything they say. So we
can hear if the candidate has competent or incompetent staff, we could hear the candidate overrule
some advisers and say something else," he continued.
The Editor says...
MSNBC apparently wants to stage a televised shouting match, rather than a one-on-one debate.
It's more likely to resemble Jerry Springer
than GE College Bowl.
How I wish this were true. Hysterical
Rachel Maddow Says SCOTUS Has Authorized Trump's 'Death Squads'. Rachel Maddow, the
MSNBC host and arch-Russiagate conspiracist, is claiming the Supreme Court has authorized Donald
Trump to send "right-wing death squads" after his opponents with its ruling on presidential
immunity. "Donald Trump and his counsel asked for this 100 percent absolute immunity thing,
which was insane. I would say they got 105 percent of what they were asking for," she
said of the ruling, which guts the lawfare prosecutions Joe Biden's Justice Department is bringing
against the America First leader.
MSNBC
Gives Extremely Absurd 'Analysis' About Latest Supreme Court Decision. Following the
Supreme Court's 6-3 ruling, which acknowledges that a former president has absolute immunity for
his core constitutional powers, and beyond that, at least presumptive immunity for official
conduct, MSNBC decided it would be a good idea to bring on a legal analyst who claims former
presidents could order assassinations and get away with it. [...] MSNBC is desperate because they
see that the tide is turning, and they will say anything with the hope that their message
sticks. Per usual, MSNBC's incendiary comments are designed to stoke fear and distract from
the actual content and implications of the ruling. Suggesting that the decision could lead to
presidential assassination orders is not only irresponsible but also blatant misrepresentation.
MSNBC
Host Pretty Sure Rising Gas Prices Due to Russian-Saudi Plot to Elect Trump. With
grocery prices steadily climbing, gas prices again on the rise, and overall inflation continuing to
hammer tens of millions of Americans, the quasi-official Democrat media continue to pull out all
the stops in their desperate attempt to prop up embattled Joe Biden and burn Donald Trump's
campaign to the ground. On Wednesday, MSNBC's Stephanie Ruhle took home the trophy. "The
11th Ruhle" host twisted herself into a ridiculous pretzel as she heroically (in hopelessly biased
fashion) tried to absolve Biden of blame. Since Trump hasn't been in office for more than two
years, she couldn't blame Trump. But wait. Ruhle is no amateur. She decided she
could blame those who (she thinks) want Trump to win in November. In this case,
"those" are none other than Russia and Saudi Arabia. Yep, as Stephanie sees it, Russian
dictator Putin and the oi-rich Saudis have concocted a plot to torpedo Biden and elect Trump.
MSNBC
Host Says Trump 'Promised American Carnage' — He Promised the Opposite.
MSNBC's "This Weekend" co-anchor Symone Sanders-Townsend (who was also Sen. Bernie Sanders'
(I-VT) 2016 national press secretary), declared on Saturday's episode of the hopelessly biased show
that Trump "promised carnage" in his January 2017 Inauguration Day address. Just one
problem. Sanders-Townsend either blatantly lied or had zero idea what she was talking
about. Trump not only didn't "promise carnage" — he promised the exact opposite,
which we'll get to in a bit. I suspect the truth was a bit of both. Sanders-Townsend
had zero idea what she was talking about, other than the word "carnage," and she ran with it.
Given her probable hatred of Trump, perhaps she assumed he said what she said he said.
Hyperbolic
MSNBC's Ronna McDaniel Debacle. The word broke on March 26 that NBC News was
reversing its decision to hire former Republican Party chair Ronna McDaniel as a political
commentator. MSNBC hosts across the schedule broke out into frenzied denunciations of
whichever executive who thought that McDaniel should be paid to speak anywhere on this
hypnotically/robotically anti-Trump network. In one of her typical half-hour jeremiads,
Rachel Maddow compared McDaniel to a mobster and a pickpocket. "You wouldn't — you
wouldn't hire a wise guy, you wouldn't hire a made man, like a mobster, to work at a DA's office,
right? You wouldn't hire a pickpocket to work as a TSA screener. And so I find the
decision to put her on the payroll inexplicable. And I hope they will reverse their
decision." There was no need for NBC News to hire McDaniel. One can look at the election
results during her tenure at the RNC and question her expertise at winning elections. But
this mobster talk underlines once again that MSNBC is not a "news" channel. It's a hyperbole
channel, constantly fearmongering its audience that the end times are near for democracy.
The Editor says...
The fact that Ronna McDaniel would ever accept a job offer from MSNBC shows that she was a RINO all along.
The
True 'Threat To Democracy' Isn't White Americans, It's The Democrat Party. Very
Important Columnists Tom Schaller and Paul Waldman just released their book White Rural
Rage, about flyover Americans and their support for Donald Trump. They're doing rounds
through the Democrat media circuit to plug it. One of those fun little appearances happened
on MSNBC's "Morning Joe." It's hard to put into words just how delusional and dishonest the
segment was — as in, every single word. These highfalutin "journalists" [...]
wouldn't know the honest truth if it introduced itself by name and punched them in the face.
Not only do the writers, who purport to be experts on Middle America, misunderstand everything
about it. They also project Democrats' nastiest and most conspicuous political impulses onto
white, rural folks. It's like the pot calling the kettle black — if the pot were
actually white, racist, conspiratorial, anti-democratic, and violent. "We lay out the
four-fold, interconnected threat that white, rural voters pose to the country," Schaller said with
a straight face to Mika Brzezinski.
Common
sense thought control. I agree that many Americans foolishly and readily accept
propaganda. A majority of Americans still believe that carbon dioxide kills life on the
planet even though the reality is that carbon dioxide and water make life possible. Many
Americans also fell for believing Putin rigged the 2016 election, that Hunter Biden's laptop was a
Russian plant and that a protest inside the Capitol was an insurrection. What these
outrageous lies share in common is that they all are promoted by the central government in efforts
to expand its power (climate change), cover its crimes of spying (Russian Hoax), fix the 2020
election (not investigating the laptop), and imprison a president to keep him from getting a second
term (insurrection). [MSNBC legal analyst Barbara] McQuade is not interested in stopping
those lies by the government. No, no, no. She is interested in silencing those of us
who tell such truths as Obama had the FBI spy on Donald Trump and covered it up with a whacky tale
of Putin being in cahoots with The Donald.
Moments
Ago Joe Scarborough Lied and Claimed Four Policemen Died on Jan 6. Today, more
than three years after Jan 6 and the unraveling of the big lie, Joe Scarborough claimed that
four policemen died on Jan 6. [Tweet] Nothing could be further from the truth.
Four people did die on Jan 6 but they weren't policemen or women, they were Trump supporters!
The
Unbelievable Nerve of Rachel Maddow and MSNBC Censoring Trump for Supposedly Saying 'Untrue
Things'. After Trump's significant win in the Iowa Caucuses this week, Rachel Maddow
of MSNBC declared that her network would not air Trump's remarks, saying, "There is a cost to us as
a news organization of knowingly broadcasting untrue things." [Tweet] MSNBC spent four solid
years promoting the Russia collusion hoax and every other anti-Trump conspiracy they could
find. Nothing was too crazy for them. Rachel Maddow made a fortune pushing anti-Trump
lunacy on her show five nights a week. In April 2019, I asked this question: Why
Isn't Rachel Maddow Treated Like Other Crazy Conspiracy Theorists? There are two major
differences between Rachel Maddow and Alex Jones. The first is that Rachel Maddow has never
suffered any consequences for pushing conspiracy theories. The second is that Alex Jones has
been right sometimes.
Rachel
Maddow Says MSNBC Won't Broadcast 'Untrue Things.' That's Untrue. MSNBC host Rachel
Maddow announced live on-air on Monday [1/15/2024] that she would not cut to President Donald
Trump's victory speech in the Iowa caucuses, explaining: "There is a cost to us as a news
organization of knowingly broadcasting untrue things." It's a line Maddow has repeatedly
used before to justify blackballing Trump, the frontrunner for the 2024 GOP presidential
nomination. [...] But Maddow's suggestion that MSNBC eschews falsehoods is itself untrue. She
and her network have repeatedly broadcast lies and false accusations as news, in many cases about
Trump. For example, MSNBC effectively endorsed claims that Jussie Smollett was the victim of
a MAGA hate crime, COVID-19 vaccines prevent transmission, the "lab leak" theory of COVID-19 was
debunked, Trump colluded with Russia to win the presidency, the contents of Hunter Biden's laptop
were Russian "disinformation," and President Joe Biden had no involvement in his son's corrupt
foreign business dealings.
MSNBC
News Actor Literally Cries About Jan 6. You might note that the tears begin
flowing conveniently, as if on cue, right when the introduction starts, and then magically subside
in literally about five seconds. [Video clip]
MSNBC
Benches Muslim Hosts Following Last Weeks Slaughter of Jews in Israel. MSNBC benched
their Muslim hosts this week following the slaughter of innocents last weekend by Hamas in
Israel. The Islamist group murdered over 1,300 innocent civilians and captured another 110
civilians as hostages. Hamas killers murdered nearly 300 young adults at a concert in
barbaric fashion. MSNBC lost 30 percent of their audience this week as they continued to run
interference for Hamas following the massacre of innocents.
MSNBC
Ratings Nosedive as People Slam Their Horrible Israeli-Hamas Coverage. We've seen a
lot of problematic responses from the left when it comes to the Hamas terrorist attacks on Israel.
But some of the worst from media have come from MSNBC. People have called them out for their
horrible takes, including trying to "both sides" the attack by Hamas on Israel. [...] I love this
network," [Jonathan] Greenblatt said. "But I gotta ask, who's writing the scripts?" "Hamas,
people who did this are not 'fighters,'" Greenblatt said. "They are not militants, and I'm looking
right at the camera. They are terrorists." Newsmax summed up how the ADL leader was
calling out the network for their coverage, except the Newmax person tagged them as "MSDNC" for their
coverage. Many others were also clearly troubled by the coverage if the ratings are any judge.
Israeli
mother of kidnapped children pummels MSNBC for asking about 'attacks' on Gaza: 'There's no
symmetry'. An Israeli mother of two children kidnapped by Hamas tore into MSNBC host
Andrea Mitchell for suggesting there's "symmetry" between the bloodshed committed by the terrorist
group and the Israel's military response. The mother, who has chosen to keep her name
anonymous out of the safety of her 12 and 16-year-old boys who were taken into Gaza, appeared on
Monday's installment of "Andrea Mitchell Reports" and shared her harrowing story about hearing her
children on the phone being kidnapped by Hamas as it occurred. However, things grew tense
between the mother and Mitchell when the host asked about her feelings on "the attacks against Gaza
right now," alluding to civilian casualties in the Hamas-controlled territory. "You're looking
for a symmetrical situation and I must say it isn't," the mother told Mitchell. "If you were
dealing with a war who is between two countries, countries don't take children hostages. I'm
sorry. It's against the laws of war. It's against humanity. It's against anything
that we all believe in."
MSNBC
Goes to Bat for Hamas in Stunning Coverage of Palestinian Invasion. The moment that
Palestinian terrorists invaded Israeli and proceeded to rape and murder Israelis on Saturday, it
was just a matter of time before an American news outlet debased itself. Sure enough, and
likely to no one's surprise, it was MSNBC that stepped up to the plate. In an absolutely
disgusting scene, multiple MSNBC hosts and analysts went to bat for Hamas while blaming Israel's
"far-right" government for the attacks against the Jewish nation. Here's supposed journalist
and Nancy Pelosi fluffer, Andrea Mitchell doing just that. [Tweet with video clip]
MSNBC:
Israel Caused Attacks on It and Made People Vote for Hamas. During MSNBC's coverage
of the Hamas attack on Israel on Saturday, MSNBC host Ayman Mohyeldin argued that the attacks on
Israel are due to "people who have been living in Gaza," being "blockaded, besieged, decimated
economically and politically" and host Ali Velshi stated that Israel's behavior is "why they voted
for Hamas in the first place."
Trump
White House Attorney Stefan Passantino Sues MSNBC's Andrew Weissman for Defamation.
Former Trump White House attorney Stefan Passantino filed a defamation lawsuit against MSNBC's
Andrew Weissman, who served as lead prosecutor for former special counsel Robert Mueller, over
Weissman's claims that Passantino coached discredited January 6 Committee witness Cassidy
Hutchinson to lie on the stand. "Hutchinson's third-hand testimony that Trump grabbed the
wheel of his presidential limousine in an effort to force it to drive to the Capitol was rejected
by the people she claimed had told her about it," Breitbart News reported. Passantino
represented Hutchinson at the time of her testimony before the committee. Many members of the
media falsely claimed he coached her to lie on the stand, a claim he has repeatedly denied.
Democrats
Discover A New 'Threat To Democracy' — The U.S Constitution. We've been
cataloging how the left has taken to labeling every candidate it doesn't like and every policy it
opposes a "threat to democracy." But even we were surprised to see the U.S. Constitution itself
added to the list of these threats. MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell said over the weekend that:
"The Constitution has some profoundly anti-democratic, which is to say anti-democracy components,
like the Electoral College and the two senators per state, for example." Mind you, this aired
on Sept. 15, just two days before Constitution Day, which this year marked the 236th anniversary of
its signing. O'Donnell was talking to Jamelle Bouie, a New York Timers [sic] columnist, who
after nodding his head in agreement with O'Donnell, added that "I think we've witnessed over the
last couple years especially with the attempt to overturn the election, the ways that the
constitution, its rules, can actually be used against what Americans think identify as a Democracy."
Reporters
Are Still Pushing the False Claim Obama Had No Scandals. The New Yorker's Susan Glaser
claimed during an interview on MSNBC the reason why former President Barrack Obama is still popular
is because he had no scandals during his administration. "Susan, it's — it's fairly
remarkable the — the extended shelf life that Barack Obama has politically in this
country. Here he is, he's been out of the presidency for quite some time, and yet he is a
critical component, obviously, of any reelection campaign for President Biden. Still, after
everything that's happened in the last six or seven years, Barack Obama is still at the top of his
game," said MSNBC's Mike Barnicle. "No, I think that's an excellent point to make.
Because, you know, you look at the incredible contrast between the actions of the Donald Trump and
his predecessor Barack Obama, and what's remarkable is that the one of the reasons I think Obama's
popularity has held among Democrats is because, you know, there was no scandal in his
administration," Glaser replied.
MSNBC
Hack Claims Joe Biden Was Not Aware of Hunter's Mega-Millions Influence Peddling Because He Was
Sad. This is the type of thoughtful, in depth commentary you can expect from MSNBC.
After Monday's historic Congressional deposition by Devon Archer, Hunter Biden's best friend and
business associate, the left is in a panic. Devon Archer sang like a bird. Archer told
House investigators that Joe Biden met with Hunter Biden's clients numerous times, joined into
meetings over the phone, and the family was rewarded with tens of millions of dollars for influence
peddling and bribery schemes. This was damning testimony that directly ties Joe Biden to the
family business and foreign bribes. Hunter and Joe Biden "sold the brand" for millions in
political favors.
MSNBC
Host Gets Fact Checked On the Spot After Claiming Hillary Clinton Didn't Have Classified
Docs. MSNBC Host Jonathan Capehart was fact-checked on air after claiming failed
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton didn't have classified documents on her
server. During an interview on PBS NewsHour, Capehart was corrected after making an
outlandish claim in which he tried to defend Clinton's private server scandal. He said former
President Trump's situation is far worse because he kept classified documents while Clinton "did
not." The Left-wing host claimed the emails on Clinton's server mainly included cooking recipes and
appointment reminders. "Donald Trump is being treated differently because he had classified
documents about nuclear secrets, preparedness of America's allies," Capehart said. "And what we're
discovering now is that he has done all of the things he has accused Hillary Clinton of doing,
actually done." Capehart argued there is no similarity at all between Clinton's matter and Trump's.
How
about an honest headline and article from MSNBC for a change? It would read, "The
media will eventually be forced to cover the history of Biden family corruption," instead of:
["]Hunter Biden can't stop gifting the GOP with potential scandals["] This
article makes it appear that Joe is an innocent bystander in the Biden Crime family's business of
lining the family's pockets with kickbacks when the truth is Joe was always the head of the family
crime business. Hunter Biden didn't fly on government jets around the World just to keep his
dad company. He flew to get kickbacks for the family and Joe has clearly lied for years that
he had no idea what Hunter or his brother did in business and that no one in his family ever made
money from foreign countries. Sadly, MSNBC, along with most of the media, has covered up for
the criminal activity of the Bidens and Clintons for years because all they care about is winning
elections. They ran lies about Trump and Russian collusion for years with no evidence, but no
matter how much evidence they have that Joe Biden participated in business deals with Hunter, they
intentionally lie to the public that there is no evidence.
Angry
MSNBC Host Angry Asks What Would Happen if Democrats Had a Propaganda Arm in the Media Like FOX
News. MSNBC's Mehdi Hasan is angry about the FOX News coverage of the Hunter Biden
scandals. Having absolutely zero self-awareness, Hasan wondered on Twitter what would happen
if Democrats had a propaganda arm in the media. Apparently, Hasan has never heard of MSNBC.
Or CNN. Or the New York Times, the Washington Post, NBC News, ABC News, CBS News, The View,
the Huffington Post, etc.
The
Left Again Beclowns Itself Over White Supremacy. [Scroll down] The MSNBC
editorial claims, "Physical fitness has always been central to the far right." Tell that to the
70 percent or so NFL and NBA players, superb athletes who also happen to be black, not far right
politically and would not be playing professional sports if they avoided physical fitness. [...]
The editorial also worries, "The realm of online fitness now provides a new and ever-expanding
market for reaching and radicalizing young men." Tell that to on-line fitness giant Les Mills,
featuring people of color as instructors and clients. Their only goal to radicalize clients
into getting in shape. I have taken several of their workout classes and never recall their
instructors attempting to convert the class into little Nazis. Another popular fitness class,
Tae Bo, founded by a black man Billy Blanks, must be a hotbed of neo-Nazi indoctrination according
to MSNBC. Michelle Obama must also be a white supremacist due to her fitness initiative "Let's
Move," attempting to reduce obesity through diet, exercise, and fitness. Another fitness
program, a spin-off of P90X called Insanity, is led by "super trainer Shaun T," an extremely fit
black athlete.
Five
times media has tried to pin physical fitness to political extremism. A recent post
on MSNBC's official Twitter site promoting an opinion story about the connection between "physical
fitness" and "the far right" has sparked social media backlash about the liberal media repeatedly
attempting to make such a connection. Twitter CEO Elon Musk and podcast host Joe Rogan mocked
the tweeted story, which was published in March 2022. "MSNBC thinks you're a nazi if you work
out lmaooo," Musk tweeted Monday, the day of the tweet. Rogan retweeted the MSNBC post with
the comment, "Being healthy is 'far right.' [...]" MSNBC did not to respond to a request
Thursday for comment about why it tweeted a story that is roughly 16 months old.
MSNBC's
Jen Psaki Defends Racial Indoctrination in Military, Blames GOP Instead. During
Sunday's [7/16/2023] edition of MSNBC's Inside with Jen Psaki, the former Biden White House
Press Secretary turned full-time Democrat propagandist went on a delusional rant about how forced
racial indoctrination trainings in the United States military aren't an issue because they're only
an hour, all the while accusing Senators like Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) and Ted Cruz (R-TX) are the
ones politicizing the military. In reality, they are the ones trying to force the military to
focus on their mission instead of pushing woke racial and gender ideology. Psaki proclaimed
it was a "right-wing conspiracy theory" that the U.S. Military is a "left-wing organization,
indoctrinating troops with hundreds of hours of DEI training."
Hilarious
and Sad Mika Brzezinski Defense of Biden Shows How Far Media Has Fallen. Once upon a
time, media was supposed to be about challenging those in power and asking tough questions on
behalf of the American people. But now, a lot of the liberal media are just sycophants for
the Democrats, stenographers getting the talking points and spewing out what they have been given
to say. Even so far as to be in favor of shutting down speech, as we saw in the case of the
Hunter Biden laptop, with some pushing the falsehood that it was Russian disinformation. But
even by that measure, MSNBC's Mika Brzezinski's take on Joe Biden hit a new level of hilarity.
According to Mika, the problem is Joe Biden's staff, not Joe Biden. She and her husband, Joe
Scarborough, were talking about Joe Biden's age when she blamed the staff for his problems.
[Tweet with video clip]
Jen
Psaki's Incredible Tin-Foil Hat Conspiracy Shows What Democrats Really Think of Minorities.
[Scroll down] That's become a topic of contention given the recent position Democrats
have put themselves in with Muslims and Asian Americans. In regard to the latter, the
decision by the Supreme Court to strike down affirmative action in college admissions, which had
institutionalized discrimination against Asians, left many on the left reeling and lashing
out. Some even went so far as to accuse Asian Americans of allying with "white supremacy."
But it's the left's battle with Muslims that has really raised eyebrows lately. As RedState
reported, multiple districts have been besieged by angry parents who do not want their children
sexualized and taught gender ideology in school. That's led to some outright physical
confrontations with counter-protesters who are apparently really obsessed with teaching
eight-year-olds they can "change" their gender. Back to Psaki, she's got a theory about all
this. You see, it's not that Democrat policies are off-putting and morally egregious.
It's that the dastardly GOP is somehow behind Muslims not wanting to pump their kids full of
puberty blockers.
Jen
Psaki Claims Republicans Are Recruiting Muslims Against Transgender People. Former
White House press secretary Jen Psaki claimed Republicans are recruiting Muslims against
transgender people in her Sunday episode of MSNBC's "Inside with Jen Psaki." Psaki claimed
Republicans are using former President Richard Nixon's "Southern Strategy" method by turning Muslim
Americans against transgender people and, in turn, winning their vote. "Now, decades later, the
right-wing is reviving that same playbook," Psaki said. "This time, with Muslim Americans and trans
people. Hear me out here, the GOP is trying to recruit Muslim Americans, a community that
makes up less than two percent of the U.S. population against another tiny marginalized group of
Americans — transgender people."
The Editor says...
The Muslims have been throwing homosexuals off rooftops for many years, back in their native lands.
[1]
[2]
[3]
For example, homosexuality is a capital crime in Iran.
The Muslims don't take their cues from the Republicans. They are following the Koran.
MSNBC
Host Mika Brzezinski Claims Abortion Bans Will Kill Women, But None Have Died.
Pro-abortion firebrand and MSNBC host Mika Brzezinski joined New York Governor Kathy Hochul (D-NY)
on Monday's Morning Joe to discuss Hochul's plans to subvert Republican pro-life legislation.
During the segment, Brzezinski made the brain busting claim that not allowing women to get
abortions will leave them dead or sterilized, followed by Hochul's Freudian slip in which she
called for utilizing military arsenals against those who oppose abortion. Brzezinski
dedicated the segment to Kathy Hochul's legislation that would enable abortion providers in New
York to send abortion pills to women in Republican states, effectively bypassing the laws enacted
in those states in the wake of RoeRoe v. Wade's repeal by the United States
Supreme Court. She, along with Hochul and activist Lauren Leader fearmongered about the
necessity of abortion, and simultaneously threatened Republicans.
The
Leftist Knives Are Already Coming Out for Potential Democrat Spoiler Cornel West.
Cornel West announced his run for president just days ago, but the left is already gunning for him
because he represents a threat to the Democrats. Kellyanne Conway recently pointed out that
West's candidacy could decide the presidency, like Ross Perot did in 1992. The left knows
this, and therefore West must be destroyed. MSNBC declares that Cornel West, a black Marxist,
is running a campaign that has "right wing DNA" if you can believe it: [...]
If
a Biden bombshell falls in the MSM forest ... where do you hear the blast? Media
outlets are already champing at the bit to serve as Joe Biden's PR department. How else to
explain all of the tough coverage of ... Joe's preference for ice cream over fish? Or MSNBC's
Stephanie Ruhle teeing up a softball question in a rare Biden one-on-one interview and not
following up on his response — "My son has done nothing wrong"? Really?
Not a single follow-up on the illegal weapons issue, not regarding his drug use, not even about
his child with Lunden Roberts, whom Hunter and the Bidens have all abandoned? That story was
in the news at that same time, with Hunter trying to convince a court that he was nothing more than
a destitute artist with a jet-set lifestyle. Ruhle didn't even bother to question Biden on
the propriety of answering her question, which certainly gave the appearance of a message to the
DoJ. If you want to know how seriously MSNBC's parent company takes its responsibility to hold
power accountable, look no further than its decision to hire Biden flack Jen Psaki as a political
analyst for Biden's re-election coverage.
Joe
Biden says Hunter has done 'nothing wrong.' Really? Let's count the ways. In an
interview with MSNBC on Friday, Biden repeated the same mantra that he has maintained since the
2020 election when his son's laptop revealed an array of possible criminal acts: Hunter has "done
nothing wrong." In the interview, Biden declared "My son has done nothing wrong. I trust
him. I have faith in him, and it impacts my presidency by making me feel proud of him."
As with media over the last four years, MSNBC's Stephanie Ruhle did not challenge the clearly
absurd statement. Instead, she prefaced her question by stressing that there are "no ties to
you" in any of his son's alleged crimes. That is, of course, ignoring the mounting evidence
of influence peddling, repeated references to the involvement of the president, and reports of a
whistleblower alleging the president's involvement in a bribery scheme.
Eleven
Minutes of Media Falsehoods, Just On One Subject, Just On One Station. The plan was a
comprehensive count. With a sizable team of smart temporary hires, each looking into a
different area of the #TwitterFiles, we thought counting all the mainstream news stories that would
need retracting or correcting in light of information found in Twitter documents would make for an
easy little sidebar, something simple for the public to digest. [...] In the Files there were
around a few dozen discrete incidents in which Twitter had concerns internally, and where the
public might want to know what those were. The "Hamilton 68" fiasco, in which a think-tank
called the Alliance for Securing Democracy purported to track 600 Twitter accounts linked to
"Russian influence activities" but turned out to mostly be following ordinary Americans, Canadians,
and British, was an example of a relatively easy fix for an editor. If you used the Hamilton
"dashboard" of accounts as a source for a story about "Russian bots," you probably needed either to
retract altogether, or add a note saying the Russian-ness and bot-ness of those accounts has since
been called into question. [Video clip]
MSNBC
Mentions Hamilton 68 Over 100 Times. I had a nasty interview with Mehdi Hasan on the
Mehdi Hasan Show yesterday on MSNBC. He pointed out issues in the Twitter Files, two of
which are definitely errors. A third, about the number 22 million in the final report of
Stanford's Election Integrity Partnership, will be the subject of a separate item. In the
meantime, here are over 100 instances of MSNBC talking about Russian bots in stories clearly
sourced to the Hamilton 68 scam outed in the #TwitterFiles. These quotes are pulled from a
larger video mashup involving multiple channels that our own Matt Orfalea is working on for an
upcoming series.
The
Powerful Media Pretend They Are Powerless. It's unintentionally laughable when cable
news hosts like Rachel Maddow break in to announce that MSNBC will not be airing any of Donald
Trump's post-arraignment speech live because "there's a cost to us as a news organization of
knowingly broadcasting untrue things." These pompous announcements aren't simply about what's
true and what's false. They are about how the media elites run our democracy by telling us
what happenings we're all supposed to be talking about and what should be shamed out of
existence. Or take, for example, how Washington Post "Fact Checker" Glenn Kessler spit nails
that conservatives are talking about George Soros throwing a million dollars at a leftist PAC right
after it pledged a million dollars to Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, the man now
prosecuting Trump. Kessler proclaimed, "The intense focus on Soros is misplaced." To
connect factual dots between Soros and Bragg is "incendiary." He's the Focus Checker instead
of the Fact Checker.
John
Heilemann Demanded Examples of MSNBC Dishonesty. Here Are a Few Choice Favorites.
English comedian Russell Brand tore into MSNBC national affairs analyst John Heilemann on a recent
episode of Real Time with Bill Maher after Heilemann dismissed Brand's suggestion that it is
disingenuous to claim that the biases exhibited on MSNBC are any different than the biases exhibited
on Fox News. [Numerous examples in the form of Tweets] Other moments that made the list
include Heilemann calling Trump voters who booed the Ohio lieutenant governor for telling them to wear
a mask "literally a death cult," as well as Heilemann's claim that then-president Trump wouldn't get
vaccinated against Covid-19 because "hard-core Trump voters are anti-vaxxers," despite Trump's publicly
advocating for the vaccine and ultimately receiving the jab. Heilemann also previously called the
theory that Covid-19 originated in a lab a "made-up" theory that Trump was pushing to help his reelection
odds and falsely claimed that Kyle Rittenhouse was a "domestic terrorist" who drove to Kenosha, Wis., "with
the intent to shoot people." And Elliott's list, though lengthy, is far from comprehensive.
Polls? We
Don't Need No Stinking Polls! MSNBC's Mika Brzezinski Claims Biden 'Extremely Well-Liked'. This one
was almost too stupid to cover, but sometimes the really stupid silliness is hard to pass up, which
is nearly always the case with anything to do with MSNBC's Morning Joe and its lovebird co-hosts, Joe
Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski. [...] Joe Biden is a disastrous president who has intentionally taken America down the
wrong path since Day One of his miserable presidency. Bottom line: Stick a fork in Joe; it's past time to kick him
to the curb. Au contraire, according to Brzezinski. With a straight face, mind you, Mika actually
declared Biden is "extremely well-liked" by the American people.
MSNBC
Guest Assures Us That There's No [Incriminating] Info About Joe Biden On Hunter's Laptop. During a
Thursday appearance on MSNBC, Washington Post columnist Matt Viser desperately tried to cover for his President,
assuring the audience that there's "nothing" on Hunter Biden's laptop that ties Joe Biden to any wrongdoing. Yes,
he actually said that with a straight face. "We've spent a lot of time with [Hunter Biden's] laptop ... and there
isn't much that ties the President to any wrongdoing, which I think has got to be the focus in order to be relevant"
said Viser. [Video clip]
Vaxxed
To The Gills MSNBC Host Suffers Myocarditis Episode, Blames The Common Cold. Vaccine cultists [...] have
blinders on to what is happening to young, healthy people around them, as well as themselves. Yasmin Vossoughian
of MSNBC took to the air yesterday and told her story of a scary episode she had with myocarditis and blamed not the
obvious experimental mRNA spike protein but rather the common cold. [Video clip]
Vile
Reid Uses MLK Day to Falsely Smear Reagan and GOP as Racists. On MSNBC's The ReidOut, the always
nasty and venomous Joy Reid used the occasion of Martin Luther King Jr Day to smear former President Ronald Reagan as a
racist who signed the federal holiday into law as a cover so people wouldn't think he's racist. This despite the
fact that Reagan was never a racist and his policies did more to get African Americans off welfare and out of poverty
than any President until Donald Trump.
'Not
An Accurate Description': MSNBC Anchor Chides Reporter for Using 'Pro-Life' On-Air. MSNBC anchor Andrea
Mitchell chided the network's senior Capitol Hill correspondent, Garrett Haake, on Thursday for using the term
"pro-life" during an on-air discussion of the Republican-backed Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Act. The bill, which
requires that medical professionals care for infants born after botched abortions, passed the House along largely
partisan lines on Wednesday, with only one House Democrat, Henry Cuellar of Texas, voting with Republicans. "At the
end of the day she was, as she described herself, 'pro-life,' and that she felt that it was important to vote for these
measures despite their potentially politically damaging or politically unappealing appearance," Haake said, referring to
Representative Nancy Mace's (R., N.C.) support for the bill. Mitchell interjected during Haake's response to
correct his terminology. "Let me just interrupt and say that pro-life is a term that they — an entire
group wants to use — but that's not an accurate description." "I am using it because that is the term she
used to describe herself, Andrea," Haake shot back.
Twitter
explodes after MSNBC health columnist calls to cancel Thanksgiving, postpone Christmas. Prominent Twitter
users erupted into a series of arguments after an MSNBC health columnist floated the idea of canceling Thanksgiving and
moving winter holidays to prevent illness. On Wednesday, Dr. Esther Choo, a professor of emergency medicine
at Oregon Health and Science University, gave her thoughts on how to prevent respiratory illnesses, such as COVID-19 and
RSV, during the holiday season. She tweeted that "for so many reasons" Thanksgiving should be canceled, winter
holidays should be moved to the summer, and winter holidays should be more "hygge," or cozy.
The Editor says...
I challenge you to find hygge in any dictionary, by which I mean a big dusty old book with a lot of definitions and
pronunciations. It's not only obscure, it isn't even a valid Scrabble word.
MSNBC
Provides 'Exhibit A' On What Happens When Inconvenient Facts Disrupt Media Narratives. Unquestionably, the
claim by the Colorado "Club Q" mass shooting suspect's attorneys that the person identifies as "non-binary" and not
a MAGA devotee has sent The Usual Suspects in the mainstream media into an absolute tailspin. Some are
conveniently pivoting, suggesting that the tragedy is still the fault of the supposed "anti-LGBTQ" rhetoric from
right-wingers because of the possibility that the suspect may have been motivated by online hate allegedly directed at
them. Others seemed shocked by the report of the shooter identifying as "non-binary" so much so that they
suggested in so many words that it must be a lawyerly ruse designed to get the person off the hook for the hate crime
charges that are reportedly being filed against them. But over at MSNBC, they were singing a different tune, as
evidenced by a Wednesday segment of "MSNBC Reports" in which anchor Lindsey Reiser, who is married to a woman, and her
panelists — including the interim deputy legal director for LGBTQ rights at the fraudulent Southern Poverty
Law Center — simply ignored the story of how the suspect is said to identify and continued on with the
narrative that "right-wing hate" was behind the senseless murders of five people.
MSNBC
anchor slammed for complaining House Democrats never investigated the Trump family. MSNBC's Mehdi Hasan
was ridiculed Thursday for claiming that House Democrats never investigated the Trump family when they were in the
majority despite many congressional investigations into former President Trump. After Republicans secured a
majority in the House, Reps. James Comer, R.-Ky., and Jim Jordan, R-Ohio., announced in a press conference
Thursday that they would be further investigating the extent of President Biden's involvement with his son Hunter's
business dealings. "The Mehdi Hasan Show" host attacked the investigation into the Biden family because, he
claimed, House Democrats "didn't do this for the Trump family," while also appearing to take a swipe at outgoing House
Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
MSNBC
Lunatics Compare Trump to Bin Laden, 9/11 Akin to Jan 6 Riots. On Tuesday afternoon, left-wing lunatic
conspiracy theorist and host of MSNBC's Deadline: White House Nicolle Wallace compared the riots at the capitol
on January 6 to the barbaric terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, that killed nearly 3,000 Americans and injured
thousands more. To make matters worse, Wallace also compared former President Donald Trump to Osama Bin
Laden. Leftist New York Times reporter Luke Broadwater began by discussing the seemingly never-ending partisan
January 6 committee, and what their final report will look like, said disgraced and thoroughly repudiated Congresswoman
Liz Cheney has indicated that the committee wants "to keep the focus on Donald Trump" and that the committee believes
its a "misdirection" to "put the blame on law enforcement" rather than those who were responsible for the capitol riots.
MSNBC
Lets Go of Conspiracy Theorist Tiffany Cross. In the same glorious week election-deniers Jake Tapper and
Shepard Smith were respectively demoted and left without a show, conspiracy theorist Tiffany Cross was shown the door at
MSNBC. After two years at the far-left outlet, Cross, who hosted a Saturday show called Cross Connection,
had become infamous and a running joke for spreading wild-eyed conspiracy theories, most of which were based on what you
might call racial paranoia. In the same glorious week election-deniers Jake Tapper and Shepard Smith were
respectively demoted and left without a show, conspiracy theorist Tiffany Cross was shown the door at MSNBC. After
two years at the far-left outlet, Cross, who hosted a Saturday show called Cross Connection, had become infamous and a
running joke for spreading wild-eyed conspiracy theories, most of which were based on what you might call racial
paranoia. From last month: "I would say a civil war is here. And I don't mean to be hyperbolic."
MSNBC
anchors, other media pundits fuel civil war fears over midterms: 'Democracy looks like it's over'. With
the midterms less than a month away, left-leaning news outlets and political commentators are resorting to dark
predictions about the future of the country with warnings of imminent civil war if Republicans retake control of
Congress in November. Talk of a second civil war among liberal journalists, television personalities and lawmakers
has become increasingly commonplace following the raid on former President Trump's Mar-a-Lago home on Aug. 8, after
which liberal pundits repeatedly claimed on-air that evolving distrust for the U.S. government among Trump supporters
would lead to escalated political violence. The topic resurfaced weeks later when President Biden called his
predecessor and "MAGA Republicans" a threat to "the very foundations of our republic" in a controversial speech in
Philadelphia.
MSNBC
calls for new "energetic atheism" to combat Christian "theocracy". The American left has plenty to complain
about these days. Liberals who support standard Democratic Party platform planks such as legal abortion, more gun
control, and public schools over private schools or homeschooling, have been drenched in bad news coming from various Supreme
Court cases and polls showing a widespread rejection of their agenda in the coming elections. [...] But at MSNBC's website,
Zeeshan Aleem has a different target in mind. Rather than blaming any one person or group of people for all of these
woes, he's found a more pervasive evil that is the fountain from which all of these disasters are flowing. You see, the
real problem is Christianity. Yes, it's embodied in the words and actions of many public figures who adhere to the
faith, but it's the underlying religion itself that's poisoning the communal well.
MSNBC's
Malcolm Nance lays out hysterical political horrors if GOP wins back Congress. If the Republicans prevail in
the upcoming midterm elections, it will be the end of democracy, future elections will be cancelled, the U.S. will become a
militarized dictatorship and Congress will come to resemble the Russian Duma with weekly impeachments of President Joe Biden
and VP Kamala Harris. The fantastic prediction comes courtesy of MSNBC national security analyst Malcolm Nance, one of
the left-wing network's most unhinged members on a very deep bench of cranks, hysterics and conspiracy theorists, a man whose
extensive history of fascistic kookiness has endeared himself to the Resistance members.
The Editor says...
It would be a waste of pixels to quote any further from the absurd claims put forth by Mr. Nance.
MSNBC
guest faith leaders slam Supreme Court over Dobbs, reverend claims abortion is 'not a biblical topic'. An MSNBC
guest reverend vocal about her disagreement with the recent Supreme Court overturning of Roe v. Wade said Friday on
"Morning Joe" that abortion is not a "biblical topic." During a conversation with faith leaders supportive of abortion
rights, co-host Mika Brzezinski asked Reverend Dr. Selene Jones about the SCOTUS decision and whether the Bible is being
used "incorrectly" to curb abortion access. Jones, who also serves as the president of the Union Theological Seminary,
told Brzezinski that abortion is "not a biblical topic" and claimed there are only "one or two" biblical references to
abortion that undoubtedly prioritize the "life and agency" of the mother over a fetus.
After
Dobbs, MSNBC legal analyst predicts privacy will be 'abolished,' desegregation next. MSNBC legal analyst Glenn
Kirschner argued desegregation and privacy rights could vanish because of the Supreme Court's recent ruling to overturn the
landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade. The former federal prosecutor complained to New York Times columnist and
MSNBC guest host Charles Blow about the spate of "horrible" decisions made by the court that upset the left, such as protecting
the rights of religious schools and public prayer. He suggested the court had given states, "unfettered power."
MSNBC's
Joy Reid: A 'Far-Right Christian Court' Is Holding Americans 'Hostage'. MSNBC anchor Joy Ann Reid claimed
Americans are being "held hostage" by a "far-right Christian court" following the Supreme Court's various rulings which she
argued frequently rules "in favor of religious institutions." Reid made the remarks on the Supreme Court's overruling
of Roe v. Wade, holding in the Dobbs case that the Constitution does not include a right to abortion[.] The far-left
anchor then claimed that in a country "that's supposedly founded on the separation of church and state, we Americans find
ourselves being held hostage by a far right Christian court."
MSNBC's
Joy Reid asserts that Kamala Harris is not being treated fairly by the 'white, male' media. MSNBC host and
commentator Joy Reid spoke out over the weekend about what she feels is unfair media coverage of Vice President Kamala
Harris. Reid blamed the 'white, male media' for treating Harris with a bias that would not be found during the tenure
of her predecessors, in an interview with The Root. 'Think about her portfolio, voting rights, immigration and the
border, and police reform. The things on her plate are the toughest things that the Biden Administration has to deal
with outside of inflation and the war in Ukraine,' said Reid. Reid blames a white, male media class for cementing a
narrative about Harris that has been hard for the Vice President to overcome: 'Most of the media is still white and
male. And their take on Kamala Harris becomes the take. It becomes conventional wisdom.'
Has
MSNBC's ratings crisis caused it to start telling the truth? Something totally unexpected happened during
MSNBC's coverage of the January 6 show trial: The network's preeminent star, Rachel Maddow, told the truth: that
Trump's rally on that day had nothing to do with the Capitol breach. Skepticism is certainly warranted, so here is
video of the startling truth-telling: [Tweet with video clip] While it is possible that Ms. Maddow has gone
rogue and is in the grip of truth fever, or is using her enormous clout there to declare her autonomy, I have to wonder if
something else might be going on. After all, CNN's new ownership has installed a boss who wants to shift the cable
channel toward the center because its ratings are so awful.
MSNBC's
McCaskill: McConnell Wants Inflation to Stay High to Distract From Jan 6. During MSNBC's recap of
Thursday night's hyper-partisan January 6 committee hearings, The 11th Hour host Stephanie Ruhle brought on failed
former Democrat Senator Claire McCaskill, to get her take on the fallout from the publicity stunt the Democrats put on.
After the duo gushed over the show the committee put on, the discussion turned to how the hearings will play
politically. Ruhle turned to McCaskill and asked about Republican Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell.
A
Novel Interpretation Of Matthew 25. Nancy Pelosi went on MSNBC's Morning Joe Tuesday [5/31/2022] to
discuss Archbishop Salvatore Cordelione's barring her from receiving Holy Communion in his diocese. Host Joe
Scarborough opened the segment by calling the archbishop's decision "disconcerting." He noted that "Jesus never once
mentioned [abortion] in the Gospels" and instead "told His disciples in Matthew 25 that we would be welcomed into the kingdom
of heaven if we gave water to the thirsty, fed the hungry, clothed the poor, and brought hope to the hopeless." Apparently,
unborn children do not qualify as "the least of these."
The Editor says...
Mr. Scarborough is very loosely paraphrasing if not misquoting the Bible, and
probably would never mention any part of the Bible on TV except to use it as a political weapon.
MSNBC's
Nicolle Wallace Faces 'Conflict of Interest' Questions After Disclosure Failure During Broadcasts. A frequent
guest on [Nicolle] Wallace's shows has been New York Times reporter Mike Schmidt, who [...] has been one of the leading
propagandists in the mainstream media at perpetuating the Trump/Russia collusion hoax alongside another MSNBCer —
Rachel Maddow — who probably more than anyone else on the network aggressively pushed the lies about the
non-existent conspiracy. Maddow also helped Schmidt promote his book, amplifying some of its claims. One of the
worst kept secrets in Beltway establishment media circles has been that Wallace, widely known as a disgruntled ex-Republican
from the Bush/Cheney years and the McCain/Palin campaign, and Schmidt were dating as early as March 2019. Despite that fact,
Wallace continued to have Schmidt on her program as a guest periodically — and apparently with MSNBC's
blessing — without disclosing their relationship as she amplified his work and they dished on his "scoops."
Retired
general, MSNBC contributor shares 'war footage', that turned out to be from a video game. Brian R. McCaffrey is
a retired four-star general and MSNBC contributor, but on Monday the distinguished former military officer made a faux pas
that he likely won't live down anytime soon. He posted a tweet that contained what he apparently thought was actual
wartime footage from the Russo-Ukraine conflict, showing what appeared to be a Russian MiG being shot down by Ukrainian
missile defenses. Twitter users, however, were quick to inform him it was actually just a clip from a video game.
McCaffrey quickly deleted the tweet and seemed to pretend the whole thing never happened. But the beauty of the
internet is that nothing can ever really be deleted, and plenty of Twitter users took a screenshot of McCaffrey's post to
ensure it will forever live in infamy.
Non sequitur of the week: Clueless
Mitchell Wonders If Court Will Overturn Brown v. Board Of Education Next. MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell wondered
on her Thursday [5/12/2022] show that if the Supreme Court cares so little about precedent in Roe v. Wade,
will it also overturn Brown v Board of Education. Because her guest was former Attorney General Eric Holder,
nobody pointed out that Brown is the case conservatives cite to justify overturning longstanding precedents.
Mitchell began by asking Holder about the leak of the draft opinion, "How unprecedented, first of all, is the leak? And
the way they came down in terms of breaking president, precedent, ignoring stare decisis and deciding to completely
overrule Roe v. Wade after 49 years."
MSNBC
Obsessively Talks About 'Racism' Every Single Day in April. The word "racism," or a variation of the word, was
used every single day in April by hosts and guests on MSNBC. "Racism," "Racist," "Structural Racism," "Overt Racism,"
"Open Racism," and even "Environmental Racism" were constantly repeated on the network with zero pushback whatsoever.
Hosts and guests would also combine "racism" with other 'woke' phrases such as "sexism," "homophobia," "xenophobia," and
"antisemitism." The use of these highly charged words was generally directed toward Republican politicians and conservative
voters but also toward the United States and its institutions as a whole.
MSNBC
Host Warns of 'Real and Devastating Consequences' of 'Letting People Run Wild' With Free Speech. The
histrionics have also reached pay-per-view quality level, but it's all free! The latest unintentional comedian was none
other than MSNBC anchor Katy Tur, who has been making a fool out of herself for years. Tur's effort came on Thursday,
as the left's meltdown continued, first over Elon Musk acquiring 9.2 percent of Twitter, then reaching cataclysmic
proportions when Musk announced a hostile takeover bid of the social media giant known for censoring conservative content at
the drop of a left-wing hat, while allowing the Taliban, for example, to continue to spew its radical propaganda at
will. In a nutshell, while Musk warns that the future of democracy is at stake if free speech is suppressed, Tur and
her fellow left-wing media lapdogs warn that free speech itself is a threat to democracy — a ridiculous notion
made even more ridiculous by the realization that these purposely deluded people actually believe it.
MSNBC's
Spin on Biden's Brutal Approval Ratings Is Beyond Comical. You cannot make this up. Okay, at MSNBC, you
can because that's what you must do to appease your Democratic Party overlords. The network's only reason for existing
is to keep liberals from having extreme heartburn. Yet, even with this piece of comedy, you can't polish how bad Joe
Biden is doing. Even CNN had a piece shredding the pivot they tried to pull here. Are you ready for this?
They said that Joe Biden's approval ratings are garbage despite a "booming economy."
Morning
Joe Gushes Over Biden's Putin Regime-Change Gaffe. Morning Joe was out in force with its shovels on
Monday [3/28/2022], doing the dirty work of cleaning up after Biden's latest — and most dangerous —
gaffe. Co-host Mika Brzezinski began by claiming that Biden's regime-change gaffe was "far more tame" than President
Reagan's hot mic moment in which he spoke about bombing Russia. The difference, of course, was that Reagan was
obviously joking, whereas Biden was dead serious. And Mika praised the gaffe for having "put the Kremlin back on his
heels." Joe Scarborough agreed, saying the gaffe was "a good thing." And in a laughable moment, he described Biden as
having engaged in "psyops," forcing Putin "to sleep with one eye open." Only a hard-core sycophant like Scarborough could
keep a straight face while promoting the notion that notoriously bumbling Biden is capable of engaging in psyops.
MSNBC
guest goes on deranged rant, claims Trump 'installed' as POTUS to clear way for Putin invasion. Another MSNBC
guest and so-called "journalist"/"scholar" has falsely linked Russia's invasion of Ukraine to former President Donald
Trump. Sarah Kendzior, a so-called "journalist" who even once wrote a book about Trump, claimed specifically —
and without any evidence — that the former president was purposefully "installed as the president of the United States
in order to weaken the alliances that were preventing Putin from achieving his goals." "Alliances like NATO, our
relationship with our European partners, our relationship with Ukraine. Trump was put in as a bulldozer," she added.
MSNBC
Discovers the True Villain of the Durham Probe: Fox News. On Saturday's [2/19/2022] Alex Witt
Reports on MSNBC, Witt invited three Democratic operatives on to discuss the real villain of the Durham
investigation: Fox News. [Video clip] The only thing more amazing than the 3-0 Democratic panel was
Witt then introducing the fact that she thinks this explanation justifies anything, considering that "derogatory information"
was used to create a false Russia collusion narrative. Witt first went to Kurt Bardella, declaring, "You know, it is a
little bit exhausting but when the right is pushing so hard on a narrative that even Durham himself cannot buy into, it
deserves a counterbalance."
MSNBC
Fake News Hosts Call Canadian Truckers Protesting Vax Mandates a 'Cult'. If the liberals weren't projecting
their own identies and lies onto others, what would they do? Have to tell the truth for once? Listen to MSNBCs
fake conservatives Joe Scarborough and Mika claim that those truckers in Canada protesting the vax mandates are nothing more
than a cult. The overwhelming amount of the videos we see from the COVID Cultists are just as tone-deaf as these two
teleprompter puppets. 99% of the insults they throw at others actually apply to them and those who agree with them, the
second you wake up and realize that, the sooner you'll realize how much you've been lied to and gaslighted for years.
"'White'
Conservatives Are 'Selfish' & 'Don't Play Well With Others'" Says MSNBC Host. It doesn't take a rocket
scientist to deduce just how ignorant MSNBC host Joy Reid truly is. She doesn't know anything about American history
(or the constitution), yet is allowed to have her own show dedicated to keeping people in the dark. Better yet, she
still claims she's oppressed. [...] [Video clip] This is exactly what happens when inmates are allowed to run the
asylum. When children are in charge, the country falls apart. It is really that simple. How Reid has her
own show on any channel is a question that may never be answered.
Joy
Reid Show Tells Blatant Lie About the Death of Officer Brian Sicknick. We've seen Twitter seemingly jump at the
chance to kick Republicans off of its platform for the excuse of "misinformation." Yet, there's a boatload of out-and-out
lies that are pedaled [sic] by those on the left and in liberal media daily — and Twitter doesn't seem to [care]
about those. Take Joy Reid. Please. [...] We saw her media malpractice with her comments about Kyle Rittenhouse,
Brett Kavanaugh, and "white male tears." Then she attacked Nicki Minaj and defended her prior vaccine hesitancy by
blaming President Donald Trump. "Why would any sensible person take a vaccine Trump had anything to do with?" she
said. But now, of course, she has taken that Trump vaccine because somehow, Biden being in the office makes it
safe? The logic of these folks just blows my mind. Reid also promoted the slimy "DeSantis is missing"
conspiracy. She's still pushing it, even after it's been fully debunked by local media. He was never missing and
continued to work while taking his wife to cancer treatments. Yet Reid and others still can't stop the lies.
MSNBC
and Leftist Activist Claim Bidens 'Build Back Better' Bill will Stop Tornadoes. In yet another ridiculous
segment on MSNBC, the host and a leftist activist seem to agree that the only way to stop tornadoes like the one that ravaged
Mayfield, Kentucky from happening again, is to pass one of the largest bills in history which will add trillions to our
national debt, Build Back Better. The leftists honestly believe they can tie any and every thing into climate change so
they can destroy the Western world, despite China spewing more of the gasses they claim is destroying the world than the top
nations, combined! Which is currently destroying Western economies as China continues to ignore it and make even more
money. [Video clip]
Joy
Reid Makes Ridiculous Claim That Gun Laws Are Based on White Supremacy. They're everywhere, they're everywhere! "They"
being "white supremacists," of course. Not that we didn't already know MSNBC's Joy Reid is without question the most bitterly
race-obsessed individual in the "news media" — if not on the planet — but almost literally, every time
this race hustler opens her silly mouth to spew even more racially-divisive nonsense, she ups her pathetic game.
I'm Thankful For Joy
Reid. In the year since last Thanksgiving, no one has been more influential in shaping the course of my career
than MSNBC's Joy Reid. Others on the left come close, but no one is quite as good at representing, day in and day out,
just how awful Democrats and the media have become. Watching Reid's show is the surest way to get a sense of where the
left's depravity stands and where it's headed. Her program has been a godsend in providing me with direction in
explaining and answering any given lie that Democrats and the media are excitedly spreading. Whatever Reid says, odds
are you can count on the opposite being the truth.
Are
MSNBC advertisers watching what they are sponsoring? My guess is that MSNBC hosts know that nobody is watching
them, and that they have to make outrageous remarks to get attention. At the same time, do the advertisers on these
shows know what the hosts are saying about their fellow Americans?
How
long can MSNBC viewers fall for the lies? Watching MSNBC you'll be told that Critical Race Theory is not being
taught in public schools. As I explained last week, while the original CRT texts probably aren't being presented,
lessons are being rammed down kids' throats that put them into two camps for instance, oppressors and oppressed. And
that America is incurably racist — well there is a cure. And that is of course CRT, even though it might be
labeled "equity training." That conversation is morphing into their belief that conservatives don't want racial history,
including slavery, taught in schools. That's just made-up nonsense. Just this morning on some MSNBC program
called Velshi, one of the panelists made the claim that many of the protesters who spoke up at school board meetings
aren't parents, or perhaps she said they don't have children at those schools. No matter. For instance as taxpayers
these patriots have a right to voice their opinion on how the biggest part of their property tax bill is spent. Secondly
if we take that twisted logic further, then Randi Weingarten, the president of the American Federation of Teachers, who has
no children, should have no voice in how are youngsters are educated.
No
Mainstream 'Journalist' Is More Racist Than MSNBC's Joy Reid. Joy Reid is at it again. Well, she never
really ceased her bigotry. Reid used to run a blog where she often engaged in anti-gay and anti-Muslim rhetoric.
The ignoble provocateur eventually figured out that her target audience didn't like that, so she found a new group of people
to hate: the white folks, especially heterosexual conservatives (including teenage boys). These are Reid's latest 85
seconds of desperate racial invective: [Video clip] [...] At some point, might Comcast decide anti-white racism is
not something to subsidize and pull the plug on Reid, as they did with the execrable Keith Olbermann a decade ago? Much
of her odiousness, sadly, reminds me of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. Constantly blaming all the world's ills on
one group of people — effectively vilifying them — should not be tolerated by MSNBC.
MSNBC
host Declares The Entire Trucking Industry to be RACIST. For a station that claims to be trying to fight
misinformation, MSNBC sure does put out a lot of it. For example, listen as this MSNBC host and her guest declare the
supply chain crisis is being caused by the "racist white men" who control the trucking industry to make Joe Biden look
bad. What they fail to mention is the fact the overwhelming majority of the supply chain crisis is actually from the
ports not being allowed to do as many ships as they normally do in states like California. [Video clip]
MSNBC
Demonizes Concerned Parents As 'Radicalized' 'Far Right Threat'. Sunday night [10/24/2021] MSNBC went all out
smearing parents in the Northern Virginia suburbs of Loudoun County as domestic terrorists. On Alicia Menendez's
American Voices, the MSNBC host and her far-left guest cruelly painted parents standing up to school boards, including a
father whose daughter was allegedly raped by a transgender student on campus because of the schools' liberal policies, as
radical rioters who were like the January 6 "insurrectionists." Menendez set up the smear campaign against concerned
parents with a graphic that read, "The Radicalized Right" in big bold letters at the bottom of the screen and "Threats of Violence"
in the top corner. Terry McAuliffe, the Democrat running in the state's gubernatorial race is facing backlash for saying
parents don't have a say in their child's education. There has been uprisings from parents across the country, including
in Virginia, over Critical Race Theory and transgender bathroom policies.
MSNBC
host Jonathan Capehart calls Trump supporters 'more worrisome' than the Taliban or ISIS. On the eve of the 20th
anniversary of 9/11, MSNBC host Jonathan Capehart announced that he believed that Trump supporters are more of a threat than
the Taliban or ISIS. Capehart called out 'MAGA and the domestic threat', which he said was far 'more worrisome than any
foreign threat', during an appearance at PBS NewsHour on Friday [9/10/2021]. The Washington Post columnist and news host
went on to describe the last several years as 'one giant step forward, and then two giant steps back.'
Deranged
MSNBC: '95%' of Americans Agree With Biden (They Don't). Following President Biden's address to the nation in
which he doubled down on his horrific failure in Afghanistan, MSNBC's left-wing propagandist Nicolle Wallace was equally
detached from reality as she falsely claimed the vast majority of Americans agreed with the disastrous policy —
despite the opposite being true. She even attacked the media for not being supportive enough of Biden. [...] Wallace
went full White House hack, imagining a fantasy in which the public were happy with Biden's shameful mishandling of
Afghanistan: ["]Well, I'm going to say two things, and both hard to say. But I'll say them anyway because
here they are. 95% of the American people will agree with everything he just said. 95% of the press covering this
White House will disagree. [...] ["] [...] Moments later, she admitted she had no idea what she was talking about:
"We haven't seen much public opinion polling on this because it's happened so quickly." Luckily, such polling does
exist — it shows that 70% of the American people disapprove of how Biden is handling the catastrophe in
Afghanistan that he created.
Cable
News 'Death Cult' Craziness Goes Unpunished. One of the regular tropes of liberal cable news in recent weeks is
applauding how Big Tech is censoring any politicians or other leaders who are spreading misinformation about the
coronavirus. They cheer when Sen. Rand Paul gets blocked by YouTube, for example, for questioning the
effectiveness of masks. But these same liberal cable networks are spewing wild misinformation about the
coronavirus.... when it comes to smearing conservatives and Republicans. You can call them murderers and terrorists, and
the "independent fact checkers" and the social-media sites yawn and do nothing. These wild-eyed lies are somehow
considered fair game. For example, on MSNBC's Morning Joe on August 9, co-host Mika Brzezinski used the word
"death cult" eight times to talk about governors like Ron DeSantis. She sneered that the Delta variant was the
"DeSantis variant." DeSantis has encouraged vaccines and worked to protect senior citizens from dying of COVID much more
effectively than say, Andrew Cuomo.
CNN,
MSNBC's ratings collapse due to 'serious credibility problem' covering Biden, experts say. The second quarter
of 2021 saw viewers ditch CNN and MSNBC in droves as experts wonder if the liberal networks can ever recover from a "serious
credibility problem" they created by relying on former President Donald Trump for success while ignoring internal gaffes and
scandals. "CNN and MSNBC were one-trick ponies, and that trick was bashing Trump," Cornell Law School professor and
media critic William A. Jacobson told Fox News. "Now that Trump no longer is president, they have tried to keep up the
mania, but it's hard. The audience has disappeared because it never was loyal to CNN and MSNBC hosts, it was loyal to
Trump hatred," Jacobson added. "It's not hard to imagine executives at CNN and MSNBC saying nightly prayers that Trump
runs for president in 2024."
Judge
Rules Rachel Maddow's Show Isn't News. I've never actually watched a full episode of Rachel Maddow's show on
MSNBC, but based on the clips I've seen, there's no doubt that it is left-wing propaganda, not news. And a federal
judge apparently agrees with that. Journalist Glenn Greenwald reports that an Obama-appointed judge ruled last month
that "Maddow's show is different than a typical news segment where anchors inform viewers about the daily news."
A Court Ruled
Rachel Maddow's Viewers Know She Offers Exaggeration and Opinion, Not Facts. MSNBC's top-rated host Rachel
Maddow devoted a segment in 2019 to accusing the right-wing cable outlet One America News (OAN) of being a paid propaganda
outlet for the Kremlin. Discussing a Daily Beast article which noted that one OAN reporter was a "Russian
national" who was simultaneously writing copy for the Russian-owned outlet Sputnik on a freelance contract, Maddow
escalated the allegation greatly into a broad claim about OAN's real identity and purpose: "in this case," she announced,
"the most obsequiously pro-Trump right wing news outlet in America really literally is paid Russian propaganda." In
response, OAN sued Maddow, MSNBC, and its parent corporation Comcast, Inc. for defamation, alleging that it was demonstrably
false that the network, in Maddow's words, "literally is paid Russian propaganda." In an oddly overlooked ruling, an
Obama-appointed federal judge, Cynthia Bashant, dismissed the lawsuit on the ground that even Maddow's own audience
understands that her show consists of exaggeration, hyperbole, and pure opinion, and therefore would not assume that such
outlandish accusations are factually true even when she uses the language of certainty and truth when presenting them
("literally is paid Russian propaganda").
How
Corrupt Is MSNBC? The Network [is] Now OPENLY Lobbying to Pack the Supreme Court. When he's not guest hosting
MSNBC's The Cross Connection, Jason Johnson is a politics and journalism professor at Morgan State University, which
does not inspire confidence in the next generation of journalists as he warned on Saturday [6/12/2021] of "catastrophic
implications" of the Supreme Court's 6-3 conservative balance and condemned Sen. Mitch McConnell for not allowing
President Biden to pack the Court. Johnson's monologue was the result of a question from a viewer wondering what "we"
have to do to make the Court more "fair and balanced" and representative of the "diverse country in which we live."
MSNBC
Hack Melts Down Trying to Turn Voters Against Trump: 'What If Trump Kills Someone?' MSNBC left-wing
contributor Donny Deutsch really wants people to stop supporting Donald Trump. During a segment on MSNBC, Deutsch had
quite the meltdown trying to "convince" people that they shouldn't support Trump. At one point, he shouted "what if
Trump kills someone" before them insulting Americans by saying "even then" they wouldn't stop supporting the former
president. [Video clip]
MSNBC
Sees 'Death Sentence' for Biden Agenda, End of Republic. To say that the Democratic hacks posing as hosts at
MSNBC are panicked is an understatement. On Monday, Nicolle Wallace lashed out at Senator Joe Manchin's announcement
that the moderate Democrat will not be voting for the radical attempt to federalize voting in this country, calling it a
political "death sentence" for Biden that might lead to the fall of the Republic. Deadline: White House
host Wallace opened the show with hyperbolic gloom: "West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin has, wittingly or unfittingly,
ushered in an official death sentence for most of the Biden agenda by enacting a brand new standard for legislation, claiming
that he will not back legislation that doesn't have bipartisan support."
Nicolle
Wallace brings the hard-hitting journalism, asks James Clyburn: 'I need you to fill me up with wisdom'. In an
interview oddly reminiscent of Brian Stelter's softball questioning of White House press secretary Jen Psaki, MSNBC anchor
Nicolle Wallace sat down with Democratic Majority Whip James Clyburn to discuss the House's voting rights legislation better
known as the "For the People Act." Wallace opened up the cringeworthy interview on "Deadline: White House" Monday
[6/7/2021] by telling Clyburn: "I'm going to be really brief because I just need you to fill me up with wisdom here."
She continued with an attack on Republicans in general: "But, the Republicans, I spent time in that party, this is their
whole game. This is a maniacal, urgent, front burner, back burner, middle burner issue and they won't stop until there
are voter suppression laws on the books... that if the election of 2020 had taken place with those laws on the books, they
might of been able to do what they're still trying to do, overthrow the will of the voters. It disproportionately hurts
black voters, minority voters, and young voters. How do you fight back if all the Democrats in Washington don't
see it that way?"
Brian
Williams Pushes Ad Likening Antifa Terrorists to American Patriots. On Friday night [6/4/2021], MSNBC host
Brian Williams collaborated with the Lincoln Project in giving free publicity to the far-left Antifa terrorist group by
shamelessly exploiting the Normandy invasion that was pivotal to defeating the Nazis in Europe. Williams —
who still has not informed viewers of the Lincoln Project's ethical problems — concluded the show by showing the
group's new ad lauding Antifa members, likening them to World War II patriots. [Video clip]
Ted
Cruz attacks Brian Williams after the MSNBC anchor labeled him 'Kremlin Cruz' for 'peddling Russian
propaganda'. Ted Cruz has torn into 'corrupt' Brian Williams, accusing him of being beholden to 'corporate
overlords' after the MSNBC anchor said Cruz was promoting 'Russian propaganda'. The war of words erupted after Cruz
criticized the US Army's new recruitment video as promoting a 'woke, emasculated military', while contrasting it with a
Russian military ad. Williams accused the Texas Senator of a 'remarkably stupid lapse in judgment' on his MSNBC show
Friday [5/21/2021], and suggested he be referred to as 'Kremlin Cruz.'
MSNBC
Contributor Calls Republicans 'White Nationalists' Who Support Terrorism. MSNBC contributor Dean Obeidallah
said Sunday [5/23/2021] all Republicans are white nationalists who defend terrorism. "In the GOP today, you're either
defending a terrorist or you're out of the GOP. That's where they are," said the host of SiriusXM Progress' "The Dean
Obeidallah Show." "It's the party we're dealing with. They're not a political party, they're a white nationalist
movement. They're a fascist threat to our nation. That's not hyperbolic, that's academic."
MSNBC'S
Joe Scarborough Spreads Debunked Lie: Trump Rioters Came to Capitol to 'Kill Cops'. MSNBC host Joe
Scarborough continued the left's revisionist history of the January 6th Capitol Riots by conjuring up Trump supporters who
went to the protest to "kill cops." "The police had guns drawn to stop the insurrections from coming in and killing
members of the House," Scarborough said. "So, yes, they're lying." Joe Scarborough is the one who is lying.
In January, days after the Capitol riots, the myth that "capture and kill" teams were among the protesters was debunked.
Disgusting
MSNBC: Pro-Life Conservatives 'Won't Be Happy' Until Rape Victims Are in Jail. MSNBC was one step away from
saying we were literally in "The Handmaid's Tale", Monday afternoon. Host Nicolle Wallace and her frenzied
feminist panel spent the first twenty minutes of her show hysterically panicking over news that the Supreme Court would be
eventually ruling on a Mississippi abortion law that passed in 2018. The state law bans abortions after 15 weeks where
the mother or baby was not in danger. Apparently, that is radical and extreme to the majority of Americans, at least
according to MSNBC's Wallace. She declared, "Just the decision to take up this case really strikes fear in the hearts
of everyone who cares about this issue, which if you look at polls is 65% of Americans that support reproductive freedoms."
Former Democrat Senator and MSNBC analyst Claire McCaskill then lectured women younger than her who don't remember life before
Roe while she savagely smeared pro-life advocates as callous to rape victims: [...]
Rebekah
Jones, the COVID Whistleblower Who Wasn't. This is a story about Rebekah Jones, a former dashboard manager at
the Florida Department of Health (FDOH), who has single-handedly managed to convince millions of Americans that Governor Ron
DeSantis has been fudging the state's COVID-19 data. When I write "single-handedly," I mean it, for Jones is not
one of the people who have advanced this conspiracy theory but rather is the person who has advanced
this conspiracy theory. It has been repeated by others, sure: by partisans across the Internet, by unscrupulous
Florida Democrats such as Nikki Fried and Charlie Crist, and on television, by MSNBC in particular.
Bill
Nye ain't no science guy. Bill Nye took his act to MSNBC over the weekend. His latest pseudo-science
screed was aimed at anti-vaxxers, Tucker Carlson, and rascally conservatives. [...] Perhaps Nye's shtick is running on bald
tires, and the left-of-Pravda network was the only place he could find airtime. Regardless, his diatribe had so many
holes that it needed an "under construction" sign. In a nutshell, Nye stated that it is reasonable to demand that
Americans be required to take the COVID vaccine. He rested his statist claim on a specious presentation of false
equivalences. It seemed as if he would break his arm, patting himself on the back for such a "slam dunk." In typical
Bill Nye fashion, his smugness, no doubt, beguiled the MSNBC audience and obscured his ignorance of logic. Nye's
conclusion was the product of a series of logical fallacies. In less than four minutes of airtime, "The Science Guy"
made eight unforced errors in a feeble attempt at crafting a pro-vaccine argument on Mehdi Hasan's show.
MSNBC
Blames Ronald Reagan For Atlanta Shootings. Democrats have been working overtime to spin last week's horrific
shooting spree in Atlanta into a mythical war on Asians. Their effort would seek to entice another important
demographic group into finding refuge inside their party's "big tent", all so they can radically remake America to their
liking. Liberal politicians along with their activist mouthpieces in the media have sought to blame the rampage on
Republicans, (including former President Donald J. Trump and his supporters) who continue to be demonized and smeared as
domestic terrorists and extremists.
Morning
Joe Calls Businesses Destroyed in BLM, Antifa Riots Nothing More Than 'Taco Stands'. 'Morning Joe' Scarborough
faced a growing backlash on social media Tuesday after diminishing family-run businesses destroyed in 'Black Lives Matter'
and Antifa protests over the summer as nothing more than "taco stands." "No, [...] I'm not going to confuse a taco stand
with the United States Capitol. I'm not going to confuse the selling of tacos with actually moving through a
Constitutional process," said Morning Joe. Economists say thousands of businesses were torched in major cities across
the country resulting in tens of billions of dollars in damages and insurance pay-outs.
Katy
Tur Tries to Gaslight Over 'Insurrection'. Katy Tur has never been known as a straight shooter. One of
the more partisan voices on MSNBC (and that's saying something), she presents herself as a hard news anchor while finding it
absolutely impossible to not let her left-wing bias show through. At one point, she compared journalists to fire
fighters, rushing into burning buildings because there's no more a delusional group of people on the planet than those who
work in the legacy news industry. [...] Perhaps Tur was comatose over last summer's festivities. The rest of us recall
the court houses on fire, the police precincts burned down, the stores looted, the violent political demands of groups like
Black Lives Matter, and the dozens of people killed and murdered. In fact, if we want to get technical, the only recent
example of a real insurrection happened in Seattle, where a group of lefty nut jobs setup an "autonomous" zone that ended up
in multiple people dead.
Brzezinski
declares 'you are not a patriot' if you don't support impeachment over Capitol riot. Is the Trump-hating left
trying to steal the term "patriot" from conservatives who have essentially owned the word since the tea party days?
Progressives are forever trying to manipulate language to persuade a leery public, and on Wednesday [2/10/2021] MSNBC host
Mika Brzezinski declared "You're not a patriot if you can't see what happened here." Brzezinski was talking about the
Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, targeting Republican lawmakers who do not support former President Donald Trump being
impeached for allegedly inciting violence. She pressed the point that the violent few who broke away from an earlier
"Stop the Steal" rally "came because of Trump. And everybody knows it."
MSNBC's
Jason Johnson: Democrats Need to Say Republicans Are 'Terrorists'. MSNBC political analyst Jason Johnson
said Wednesday [1/27/2021] on "Deadline" that citing the example of QAnon supporter Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA)
that Democrats should declare all Republicans are "terrorists," adding "you can't negotiate, you can't legislate and you
can't work with terrorists."
MSNBC:
How Do We 'Deprogram' Millions of Racist, Violent Trump Supporters? Nikole Hannah-Jones, of the NYT's 1619
Project, appeared on MSNBC's Morning Joe Tuesday, to join the panel in attacking Senators Josh Hawley and Ted Cruz, as well
as the 74 million Americans who voted for President Trump this past election as evil racists akin to the KKK. Panelist
Eugene Robinson from The Washington Post even demanded "millions" of Americans needed to be "deprogrammed." The disgusting
segment began with co-host Joe Scarborough posing to Hannah Jones that Trump supporters were actually well-educated and wealthy
Americans (such as these two Senators), and not blue collar rubes, as the narrative goes. This led to an obnoxious
condescending sermon from Hannah Jones: [...] MSNBC's race-baiting, Republican bashing propaganda was paid for by
advertisers Allstate, TD Ameritrade, and Sleep Number, whom you can contact at the Conservatives Fight Back
page here.
Hilarious:
MSNBC's Al Sharpton Repeatedly Insists He's 'Nonpartisan'. During MSNBC's live coverage of the Georgia Senate
runoff election, race hustler and longtime PoliticsNation host Al Sharpton reveled in the possible victories of
Democrats Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock by insisting that he and his fellow civil rights activists are "nonpartisan"
individuals concerned about the direction of the country. Former liberal Republican-turned-leftist and MSNBC host
Nicolle Wallace introduced Sharpton by insisting that the election has not only hinged on "issues of...race" and "issues of
identity," but also "how extraordinarily disciplined the candidates on the Democratic side have been."
Florida vs New York —
Media Bias. [Thread reader] As of today, NY's deaths per 100k from coronavirus (188) is about double
Florida's (96). Florida and Gov. DeSantis seem to be doing something right in that regard. But you would have no
idea that was the case if you spend your days listening/watching/reading MSNBC. [...] I'll pause here to drive the point
home: by the most critical metric, deaths per capita, DeSantis has outperformed Cuomo enormously. Cuomo's led one of
the most disastrous crisis responses in US history. If NY were a country it'd have the highest death per capita IN
THE WORLD.
The
Worst People In Media 2020. [#1] Joy Reid. Liberals fail up. There's really no other explanation as
to why this conspiracy theorist who only takes a break from lying to make a complete fool of herself would get a new show on
MSNBC. The fraud who lied about her blog being hacked to cover up her history of homophobia had been relegated to an
unwatched weekend slot, but now she's back in the big leagues. Why? Why not? When you have no standards,
when you set the bar so low it's laying on the ground, anyone can clear it. How else could anyone explain elevating
someone so blatantly stupid, not to mention racist? Maybe next year we'll finally get an answer from the FBI about who
posted all those homophobic and transphobic things on her old blog? Don't hold your breath.
Stacey Abrams isn't unsung by any means. She self-sings constantly! What?!
MSNBC Hails Stacey Abrams, One of 2020's 'Unsung Heroes'. MSNBC hosts Al Sharpton, Ali Velshi and Joy Reid
celebrated their network's annual "Revvies" awards Sunday night on PoliticsNation. The virtual awards show split
its time between bashing the "worst of the year" (everything Trump) and hailing the "best of the year" from far-left
activists and Democrats. "MSNBC Republican" strategist Susan Del Percio also joined the panel of judges. Opening
the show by bashing Republicans and the President with their "ridicu-list," they moved onto the President's "worst moments,"
which included the "suggest[ion] of injecting bleach." President Trump won the most "blueberry pie" on their face award, with
runner ups Rudy Giuliani, Brad Parscale, and Sidney Powell. This typical hyper-partisan spin was then followed by gooey
praise for the left. For their "Unsung Hero of 2020" Award, Sharpton actually nominated failed 2018 gubernatorial
candidate Stacey Abrams, who has gotten almost as much praise as Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.
The worst-case scenario is the only one that sells newspapers, books, or cable news. MSNBC
Doom and Gloom Doc: Don't Get Overly Optimistic About the Covid-19 Vaccine, We're in For a "Decades-Long Battle". MSNBC
rolled out a doom and gloom doc Thursday morning [12/24/2020] who warned Americans not to get overly optimistic about a Covid vaccine
because we are in for a "decades-long battle." Dr. William Haseltine promoted his books on Covid as he fear-mongered.
Dr. Haseltine doesn't want Americans to forget about Covid and go on with their lives because he has books to sell.
MSNBC
Hack Steve Schmidt Compares Trump Supporters To '20s Or 30s' Nazi Germany. MSNBC contributor Steve Schmidt
proved once again he's a liberal hack who will say the most outrageous things imaginable about Trump supporters. During
an interview on "Deadline," Schmidt — a Never-Trumper who cofounded The Lincoln Project — compared
supporters of President Donald Trump marching in Washington, D.C., over the weekend to brownshirts from Fascist Italy or Nazi
Germany in the "1920s or 1930s." "But we should all be terrified of what we saw this weekend in Washington, D.C., and we
should think about it," Schmidt said. "What is it that we saw this weekend in Washington? What was it? They
weren't wearing brown and black uniforms like they would have in Italy or in Germany in the 1920s or 1930s, but they're the
same people," he continued.
Jon
Meacham Loses MSNBC Contributor Gig for Failure to Disclose Biden Work. Newsweek-killer and now
disgraced Jon Meacham lost his job as an MSNBC contributor after failing to disclose the work he'd done for presidential
candidate Joe Biden, reports the far-left New York Times. Oh, and Meacham also went on the air and praised a
speech he helped write without disclosing he helped write it.
MSNBC
Balloonhead Chris Hayes Claims Confirming Justice ACB Led to 100,000 Deaths. Last night [10/287/2020], Chris
Hayes, a mainstream media balloonhead who doesn't get nearly enough credit for his ridiculousness and over-the-top
sensationalism, made one of the most mind-bending non-sequitur statements I have ever seen. Hayes claims that
Republican's confirmation of now Justice Amy Coney Barrett has cost 100,000 American lives. [Video clip]
According to Hayes, the confirmation of Amy Coney Barrett was a Republican priority because it can't be reversed, but also
what can't be reversed are the deaths of "probably 100,000 Americans." Yes, listen to the mainstream media who tells
you that Republicans cause deaths by filling an empty seat on the Supreme Court.
Brzezinski
on Trump Returning to WH from COVID Bout: 'Isn't This Manslaughter?' MSNBC's "Morning Joe" co-host Mika
Brzezinski on Tuesday asked if President Donald Trump could be guilty of "manslaughter" if he got someone at the White House
sick and they eventually died as a result of his having the coronavirus. Brzezinski said she hopes it does not happen,
but asked host Joe Scarborough if Trump is endangering the lives of members of the Secret Service by exposing them "to his
deadly virus."
The Editor says...
Apparently it ain't that deadly, Mika. And since nobody died as a result of this incident, it's not manslaughter.
Ten
Great Deceptions Designed to Destroy the Republic. There are at least 10 major lies that are now so ubiquitous
that most people never question them: [...] Lie #10 — If It's On Television, It's True: They wouldn't lie,
would they? Wish it were so. Marketing, and corporate-subsidized news networks, are all about spin. Truth
is never paramount. I mean, what good would it do to spend millions of dollars coaxing the public to buy a product
that's "kinda okay?" It has to be subliminally attached to a need that drives us to make purchases that are irrational.
Lying is breathing in marketing. One of the most egregious lies I've ever seen: Ali Velshi, in an MSNBC report,
is standing in front of a burning police precinct claiming the riots were just protests and not really "unruly." What
does lying like that do to a person? To a soul?
Progs
furious at MSNBC's 'historic first' Black weekday evening host, Joy Reid. It's one thing to spout Hamas
propaganda, get her facts all wrong about Hillary Clinton's email scandal, or even lie about people hacking her blog posts to
evade responsibility for what she wrote. It's quite another to imply anything negative about Muslims on MSNBC's
programming. Even if spreading the latest phony progressive talking point that Trump-supporters are responsible for the
BLM/Antifa riots... because they are acting the way "Muslims act." [...] MSNBC took a gamble when it plucked Reid from the
ratings hell of weekend mornings to replace Chris Matthews in its prized 7 P.M. weekday time slot. Matthews had
"resigned" following pressure over remarks and behavior criticized as sexist, and after rotating various substitutes through
guest hosting, the network opted for another "historic first" with the first black cable news host of a weekday evening
show. It's interesting that nobody seems to be calling for her firing, which I attribute to "historic first privilege."
MSNBC's
Joy Reid Doubles Down on 'Way Muslims Act' Remarks That Sparked Outrage. MSNBC host Joy Reid on Wednesday night
[9/2/2020] said she should have been more "sensitive" two days earlier when she seemingly compared radicalized Trump
supporters to "the way Muslims act," remarks that sparked outrage among Muslim activists and organizations. More
specifically, it was a non-apology. [...] After noting anti-Muslim stereotypes have been prevalent in media and
entertainment, Reid then wondered aloud why there was a double standard when it came to describing extremism among white
right-wingers compared to Muslim terrorism, taking aim at how the president has radicalized his base. "It's the
misportrayal that is the problem," she stated. "We're all too quick to call out those who radicalize young men who are
vulnerable. There have been treatments of this all over cable news for years. But when white Christians are
radicalized, we don't react the same way."
MSNBC
Blames Fox for Trump Not Being Blamed for Riots. On Friday's [8/28/2020] The Last Word on MSNBC, fill-in
host Katy Tur presided over a panel discussion which placed the blame for recent rioting on President Donald Trump, and also
blamed Fox News for convincing Trump voters not see him as responsible. MSNBC contributor Yamiche Alcindor —
who is also a correspondent for PBS NewsHour — recalled that President Trump has been trying to incorporate
concerns over rioting into his campaign message, and then cited new polling suggesting that independents are turning against
the Black Lives Matter movement because of the "chaos." She concluded by fretting that the "peaceful message" of BLM is
being "conflated" with "out of control rioters." [Video clip]
MSNBC
Blames Racism for Voters Preferring Trump on Economy. Once again proving that the liberal media can interpret
an ulterior motive of racism by conservatives into any issue, MSNBC host Katy Tur and MSNBC Republican contributor Michael
Steele hinted on Tuesday afternoon [8/18/2020] that racism has the reason why so many voters have told pollsters they prefer
President Donald Trump to better handle the economy than Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden. As the two
discussed why Trump still has high ratings on the economy despite the decline it has taken since the pandemic, the two talked
in circles a bit before Steele finally suggested that it was the "ugliness" of suburban whites not wanting minorities moving
into their neighborhoods that was driving pro-Trump sentiment expressed to pollsters.
Trump
team accuses MSNBC of doctoring photo to hide Biden notes for Harris video call. Cable news network MSNBC is
being accused of doctoring a photo of 2020 presidential candidate Joe Biden following his announcement of California
Sen. Kamala Harris as his running mate. The Biden campaign released a photo of Biden speaking to Harris via video
call, and critics quickly pointed out what appeared to be notes prompting Biden what to say on the call. The Trump
campaign accused MSNBC of editing the notes out, according to Fox News. "MSNBC cropped the photo of Joe Biden video
chatting with Kamala Harris, removing Biden's talking points from the image," the Republican National Committee's rapid
response director, Steve Guest, posted on Twitter. "It's an embarrassment Biden needed talking points to talk to his
own VP. Biden is clearly a puppet of the left."
MSNBC
Host Blames Trump For Herman Cain's Death. Mika Brzezinski, co-host of MSNBC's "Morning Joe," went well out of
her way to malign President Trump on Thursday, saying he's to blame for the death of former Republican presidential candidate
Herman Cain. "Just the facts — Herman Cain went to the @realDonaldTrump TULSA SUPERSPREADER rally -no
mask. The campaign squashed people close so the crowd would look bigger. They cheered for their President for
hours. Cain tested positive for COVID nine days later. Now Herman Cain is dead," she wrote on Twitter.
MSNBC's
Brian Williams Whacks Federal Agents as 'Jackbooted Thugs,' Invokes Mussolini. Twenty-five years ago, former
president George H.W. Bush quit the National Rifle Association over a fundraising letter which referred to federal law
enforcement as "jackbooted thugs." This delighted the media elites then. The script has flipped. Now the term is
welcomed by left-wing media outlets. Several times this week, MSNBC host Brian Williams has used his primetime show
The 11th Hour to hype Twitter comments by never-Trumper MSNBC contributor Steve Schmidt in which the bitter former
Republican slammed federal agents in Portland as "jackbooted thugs" and "stormtroopers." On Wednesday's [7/22/2020]
show, the MSNBC host even had Schmidt on as a guest and gave him a platform to further bash federal agents, with Williams
provocatively invoking Benito Mussolini's Italy.
This might be the lie of the year. Todd:
MSNBC's Daytime Newscasts Have 'No Editorial Point of View'. At the end of an interview with Trump Campaign
Director of Communications Tim Murtaugh on Wednesday's "MSNBC Live," NBC host Chuck Todd stated that "there is no editorial
point of view here on any of these newscasts on MSNBC in the daytime." Murtaugh responded to a question from Todd's
co-host, Katy Tur, on the safety of Trump's events by stating that the Trump rallies took precautions and argued that
Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt's (R) coronavirus diagnosis could not be pinned on the rally in Oklahoma because it took place
25 days after the rally.
Walter
Duranty Is Alive, Well, And Spreading Fake News About CHOP. Newsbusters has diligently captured some of the
cartoonish coverage attached to the "Summer of Love," Mayor Durkan's quickly discarded term for the chaos in her own
city. Here's just one example: As early as June 12, Seattle Police Chief Carmen Best told local reporters:
"Rapes, robberies, and all sorts of violent acts have been occurring in the area that we're not able to get to." But a day
later, Dan Simon, a correspondent for self-proclaimed "Facts First" network CNN, claimed on camera: "The facts on the
ground indicate that this is an entirely peaceful situation." MSNBC followed suit, along with other reports from CNN.
"This has been the mostly peaceful week these streets have seen," added an MSNBC reporter on the periphery of the zone.
The New York Times did all it could to spin on the zone's behalf early on. [...] It's reminiscent of MSNBC's Ali Velshi
describing an early George Floyd-themed protest as "peaceful" while an inferno raged behind him. "I wanna be clear on
how I characterize this," said Velshi, reporting live from Minneapolis. "This is mostly a protest, it is not, it is
not, generally speaking, unruly." Velshi's inept reportage quickly went viral.
Celebrating the Talented Members
of the MSNBC All-Decade Team. [For example] Joy-Ann Reid: Forced to apologize, but never punished, for a
series of homophobic blog posts that resurfaced in 2018. Despite apologizing and accepting responsibility for the posts, Reid
later claimed she was the victim of a malicious hacker who planted "fabricated" posts on her old blog. FBI
cybersecurity experts were called in to investigate, but have yet to identify the hacker. Brian Williams:
Suspended in 2015 for telling false war stories about coming under fire in Iraq, continues to struggle with basic math.
Melissa Harris-Perry: Show canceled due to low ratings and the host's preference for discussing Beyoncé music
videos instead of politics, forced to apologize for making fun of Mitt Romney's adopted black grandchild. Once
described as "America's foremost public intellectual," she once argued that the word "Obamacare" was racist.
As
[MSNBC] Reporter Claims 'Protests' 'Entirely Peaceful,' He Gets Proven Wrong Live on Air. As we have previously
reported, MSNBC has been consciously trying to avoid calling the riots over the death of George Floyd "riots." They've
used all kinds of other terms. As rioters were setting a fire right behind Ali Velshi, he claimed they were "mostly
protests," not generally speaking "unruly."
A Judge Rules Rachel Maddow is
a Fake News Fabulist and Not a Journalist. A stark admission to avoid culpability took place. A court
decision came in with a pure document-dump timing this past weekend. On Friday a judge dismissed a lawsuit brought
against MSNBC personality Rachel Maddow by the upstart network One America News, and most in journalism circles probably
shrugged with smug satisfaction, if they even noticed during the news vacuum on a holiday weekend. The $10 million suit
was a defamation case, where OAN stated that Maddow had slandered the network on-air when she declared it was an outlet of
"paid Russian propaganda". What has not been properly acknowledged is that in order for her to evade responsibility in the
case Maddow took on the defense that she was not delivering fact-based news on her program that evening, something the judge
agreed was accurate.
Unmasked:
MSNBC's Double-Standard, Elitist, Mask-Shaming Faceplant. It's a couple of days old, but still absolutely
delicious as a demonstration of self-important elite snobbery and hypocrisy. On Memorial Day, MSNBC sent a crew
out to Lake Geneva, Wisconsin, to make sure everyone saw the hicks in the sticks walking around without masks. "Are
they not worried about their personal safety?" the host asks the reporter. "Nobody's wearing them," the reporter
replies — and at that point, a passerby blows the whistle on MSNBC's hypocrisy[.]
MSNBC
phony mask-shaming busted on live TV. If you love seeing progressive, phony propagandists devastatingly
embarrassed, this video, less than a minute in length, is a moment to save and savor. And send to you friends who are
cowering in fear of encountering a mask-free human being while outdoors in the sunshine, where coronavirus transmission is
almost impossible unless French kissing somebody. It happened during a live shot in which anchor Katy Tur was
expressing shock ("Are the people out there are just not worried, Cal?") that people were out and about on the streets
without wearing (useless) face masks. Cal Perry, the street reporter in a black mask in Lake Geneva, Wisconsin, a
popular resort, did his stand-up routine that nobody was wearing a mask. Then the camera panned to focus on a maskless
young man who was walking by (while taking an iPhone video of the TV crew and reporter) as Cal intoned, "Nobody is wearing
them." Big mistake. The passer-by fired back, "Neither is your cameraman."
MSNBC's
Velshi: Trump Deeming 'Essential' Could Violate 'Church and State'. This has got to be one of the most
dumbfounding [we're tempted to drop the "founding"] statements made by a member of the liberal media regarding the
coronavirus. On his MSNBC show this morning [5/23/2020], Ali Velshi suggested that by deeming houses of worship
"essential," thus qualifying them to reopen, President Trump could be in violation of the "separation of church and state."
[...] Let's begin by noting that, contrary to Velshi's citation of the "separation of church and state," that phrase is
nowhere to be found in the First Amendment. But liberals love to use it in seeking to drive all religion out of the
public square. Here is the actual wording of the relevant portion of the First Amendment: "Congress shall make no
law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." The Founders' intent has been clearly
understood as prohibiting the establishment of an official state religion, as in the Church of England.
President Trump's classification of houses of worship as essential did the very opposite of that. From far
establishing one state religion, he said that his order was applicable to all "houses of worship," explicitly
including "churches, synagogues, and mosques."
It
Never Ends: Now MSNBC Suggests Vladimir Putin Was Behind DOJ Dropping Case Against Michael Flynn. The
media over the past few years has reported a false narrative that President Donald Trump colluded with Russia during his 2016
campaign to steal the election. That narrative was proven false after a lengthy special counsel investigation found no
evidence of such collusion. Media outlets and their Democrat supporters refused to acknowledge that they got the story
wrong or that they were biased in their reporting. They are continuing that behavior now that the Department of Justice
dropped its charges against former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn. [...] But even though Flynn appears to have
been vindicated and the victim of FBI entrapment, MSNBC host Andrea Mitchell had a different take: That Russian
President Vladimir Putin was behind the DOJ's charges being dropped.
If
Trump Can Lead U.S. Back To Work, Democrats Will Have Shot Their Bolt. [Scroll down] Trish Regan rightly
saw that the press and official Democrats were going to attack Mr. Trump from every angle on the issue — for
dismissing it at first (as they did themselves) and moving too slowly to expand testing facilities (even as Abbott Laboratories
brought out an easy and swift testing device), and by claiming the president was an anti-science moron until he assembled a
strong professional task force to manage the crisis. They criticized his championship of hydroxychloroquine until
New York governor Andrew Cuomo revealed on Monday [4/6/2020] that he was dispensing it to tens of thousands of New Yorkers
with initial success. Mika Brzezinski on MSNBC had already declared that we should "follow the money," and implied
that the president had a financial interest in that drug, a decades-old malaria remedy. This was so grossly defamatory,
it could pass as criminal slander if the president wanted to press his rights.
MSNBC
contributor says Trump's 'crime cult' wants mass murder, 'many more to die'. Whereas the craziest denizens of
the political right tend to inhabit the outermost fringes of the movement, the most demented denizens of the political left
tend to be mainstream left-wing media stars. Take so-called "journalist" and author Sarah Kendzior, whose work has
appeared in Al Jazeera, Marie Claire, The Guardian, The New York Times and The Boston Globe — and whose commentary
has frequently been featured on MSNBC's "AM Joy."
Without
Any Evidence, 'Morning Joe' Suggests Trump May Have Financial Tie to Malaria Drug. If you've been watching
President Donald Trump's daily White House press briefings, you've likely noticed the president is fighting a war on two
fronts. On one hand, he is attempting to guide the country through a battle against a foreign contagion that is not
only killing thousands of Americans but also putting millions more out of work. On the other hand, Trump is fighting a
separate war against members of the establishment media, many of whom sit in chairs in the briefing room cloaked as
journalists — ready to strike with their baited questions and hateful insinuations.
Abject
stupidity: Mika Brzezinski claims Trump is pushing antimalarial drug as COVID treatment because of 'financial
ties'. When more people tune in to watch old cartoons than watch your morning 'news' show, you have to do and
say outrageously stupid things in order to 'get noticed.' Enter Joe Scarborough and wife Mika Brzezinski of MSNBC.
On Monday [4/6/2020], Brzezinski actually suggested that the reason why President Donald Trump is pushing anti-malarial drug
hydroxychloroquine as a possibly effective treatment for coronavirus — you know, the pandemic that has 9/10ths of
our country in shutdown mode — because of a "financial tie." Meanwhile, her parrot husband kept asking on the
show why the president would push "an unproven drug" as a potential cure for a disease that has been successfully treated
with it, according to a growing number of doctors.
Brzezinski
on Trump Pushing Hydroxychloroquine: 'There's Got to Be Some Sort of Financial Tie'. Monday, MSNBC "Morning
Joe" co-host Mike Brzezinski reacted to President Donald Trump's Sunday press conference with the White House coronavirus
task force discussing the coronavirus pandemic. Host Joe Scarborough noted Trump is "pushing an unproven drug" in
hydroxychloroquine to help combat the virus. Brzezinski then speculated Trump continues pushing the drug because
"there's got to be some sort of financial tie to someone somewhere."
Armchair
Quarterbacks Try to Rewrite History on Coronavirus. This morning [4/1/2020], MSNBC's Joe Scarborough claimed
that, unlike the Trump administration, "Everybody saw this coming in early January." If Scarborough knew that a deadly,
once-in-a-century pandemic was about to descend on the nation in early January — I assume he considers himself
part of "everyone" — why on God's earth didn't he warn his susceptible viewers that they should begin social
distancing? Why didn't his producers book a single expert who could beseech his viewers to start wearing masks, to
shutter their non-essential businesses, and to avoid church and sporting events? Why didn't he mention coronavirus at
all? Even in late January, nearly a full month after "everyone knew," Scarborough's show was dominated by the Donald
Trump impeachment trial.
The
Disgraced Media Are Ramping Up Their Coronavirus History Revision. One of the big narratives from the left is
that the President's handling of the Wuhan Coronavirus Pandemic has been a bungled mess. [...] "We've heard, Zeke Emanuel,
that nobody could have seen this coming. The fact is, everybody saw this coming. Everybody saw this coming in
early January." That claim is as bold as it is false. Whereas Scarborough claims that "everybody saw this coming" in
early January, the earliest mention we can find Scarborough making of the disease was February 24th when an "expert" came
Morning Joe and said Americans should worry about the flu, not the Coronavirus.
Math
is hard, even for an MSNBC panic-spreading virology expert. It was just a few days ago that Brian Williams and
Mara Gay mindlessly repeated a meme saying that, instead of spending $500 million on advertising, Bloomberg should just have
given all 327 million Americans a million dollars each. The correct answer is that Bloomberg spent $1.52 per American.
On Monday [3/9/2020], a guest again went stupid about math, this time while trying to explain how many Americans will die from
coronavirus. According to Dr. Joseph Fair, only 80% of the population will survive: [...] Mediaite, from which the
above quotation comes, doesn't question Fair's math. Instead, it takes the numbers at face value and then attacks Trump.
[...] Fair made a foolish mistake (presumably he knows better), but both MSNBC and Mediaite ran with the error to undermine Trump's
presidency. These people are both evil and stupid. Here's the deal with the media: they don't know what they're
talking about, so analyze everything they say before you start to worry.
Chris
Hayes goes into full meltdown, says Trump will let Americans die from Coronavirus to win reelection.
Progressive MSNBC commentator Chris Hayes lost his mind Saturday night in an unhinged, multi-tweet rant accusing the
administration of "incompetence and malevolence" and of being "sociopathic" in managing the growing coronavirus crisis.
"Trump is attempting to cover up the full scope of the outbreak in order to boost his chances for re-election, Hayes
wrote. "In doing so, he is quite literally threatening public health," he added. The leftist network host went
all wobbly and aflutter following a story released by the AP charging that the Trump administration removed from a CDC plan a
recommendation that "elderly and physically fragile Americans be advised not to fly on commercial airlines because of the new
coronavirus." The AP's source for the story was an anonymous federal official.
Why
did MSNBC sack Chris Matthews? Earlier this week, Chris Matthews announced on his MSNBC show "Hardball" that he
was quitting. He then walked off the set. Later, we learned that the network forced him to resign.
Why? One explanation is that Matthews made female guests on his show and some female employees "uncomfortable" with
sex-charged banter. But reportedly, Matthews has been doing this forever. [...] Surely, there is more to Matthews's
discharge than this. The "more," I think, is the fact that Matthews offended supporters of Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth
Warren. Barack Obama may have sent a thrill up Matthews's leg, but the two elderly far leftists running this year
don't. Matthews, I gather, is something of a traditional liberal, and thus at odds with MSNBC's core viewership.
Matthews got on the wrong side of Warren's supporters by daring to inquire of her why she believes the allegation that
Michael Bloomberg said to a pregnant woman "kill it," meaning the unborn baby.
The
real reason Chris Matthews was fired from MSNBC. Chris Matthews didn't get fired for being a sex monster.
He got fired for doing his job. [...] Matthews laid it on a bit thick at times. Comparing Bernie Sanders to the Nazis
overrunning France? Ridiculous. Never compare anyone who hasn't murdered at least a million people to
Hitler. Still, hysterical analogies are exactly what drives viewership of "Hardball" and all the TV and radio shows
like it. We tune in to these guys hoping they'll say something completely bonkers. Yet to assuage the Bernie
Bros, MSNBC (which a couple of weeks ago was forced by market pressures to announce it would be hiring more Bernie-friendly
voices) made Matthews issue a groveling apology for the Nazi joke. This on a network where the comparisons of President
Trump to Hitler are so unremarkable that it happened seven times in July alone.
MSNBC
anchor Chris Matthews announces he's retiring days after a female journalist accused him of harassment. MSNBC
anchor Chris Matthews announced that his Monday night program would be his last on the network just days after a female
columnist accused him of harassing her and amid criticism of his political punditry. Laura Bassett, a freelance
journalist who covers politics, gender, and culture, accused Matthews last Friday of making suggestive comments to her at
least twice in 2016 when she was a guest on his show.
MSNBC's Chris
Matthews Announces Retirement On Air. MSNBC host Chris Matthews announced his retirement on air Monday,
following a number of negative stories about Matthews in the last month. "Let me start with my headline tonight, I'm
retiring," Matthews said at the open of his show.
Chris Matthews,
MSNBC Veteran, Resigns. Chris Matthews announced his retirement from MSNBC Monday night after more than two
decades at the network. The MSNBC mainstay made the stunning at the start of Monday's night edition of Hardball, a show
that has for years been a staple of the network's politics programming. It also became a headache for MSNBC brass in
recent weeks as Matthews came under fire for his often out-of-touch commentary.
The Editor says...
Fake news alert: The headline says he resigned. The first sentence of the story says he retired.
There's a huge difference.
Chris
Matthews' resignation from MSNBC [was] hastened by [a] series of blunders. Chris Matthews' abrupt resignation
at the beginning of MSNBC's "Hardball" Monday night came after several weeks of blunders that prompted the network to take
action, say people familiar with the matter. [...] MSNBC had no comment, but people familiar with the matter say the
timetable for a planned retirement was suddenly accelerated after a series of mistakes and missteps by the onetime Jimmy
Carter speechwriter and Tip O'Neill aide. But for Matthews, a passionate political junkie, to bow out the day before
Super Tuesday, rather than at the end of the primaries or even the end of the week suggests he did not control the timing.
The Editor goes slightly off-topic:
Regular visitors, if any, may notice that, from time to time, The Editor re-inserts the missing words from news headlines, in order
to translate them from Headline-ese to English. Words were occasionally omitted from headlines in the early 20th century, when
newspapers were printed in tightly-constricted columns and space was at a premium. Today, well into the 21st century, headline
writers still feel the need to conserve space and distort the English language.
Chris
Matthews' Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Week (And It's About Time). It's safe to say that MSNBC's Chris Matthews
had a bad week this past week. He got blasted a lot from folks on the left side of the aisle this week and it may
ultimately have taken a toll. He started off the week having to apologize for comparing Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT)
electoral success in Nevada to France's defeat to Nazi Germany in World War II. Some even called for his firing for the
criticism of Sanders. [...] So by the end of the week, people noticed something that was missing about the South Carolina
primary coverage on Saturday night — Chris Matthews, who was noticeably absent.
Left purging
Comrade Matthews. The Left is purging Comrade Chris Matthews at MSNBC for being a counter-revolutionary and
having impure thoughts. His crime was saying Democrats could not stop Breadline Bernie after the Nevada caucuses.
Matthews said on the air, "I'm reading last night about the fall of France in the summer of 1940. And the general calls up
Churchill and says, 'It's over,' and Churchill says, 'How can it be? You got the greatest army in Europe. How can
it be over?' He said, 'It's over.'" The network — which has promoted a French Resistance against American
President Donald John Trump for more than 3 years — made Matthews beg forgiveness on television for a very
remote reference to the Wehrmacht.
Fake
News and the 2020 Election. [I]n August 2019 Lawrence O'Donnell, MSNBC host, announced that Trump was a Russian
operative and that Russian oligarchs were signing loans for Trump. This was an actual statement, not a description of a
bad Hollywood Cold War script. O'Donnell later apologized, explaining that his story came from a source close to the
Deutsche Bank who had told him that Trump's loans were co-signed by Russian billionaires close to Putin. But in what
seems more paranoia than genuine analysis, he still persisted in his essential argument, declaring that Putin was working
hard to reelect his favorite president of the U.S., and that Putin was Trump's real running mate.
What's
Really Behind the Left's 'Cancel Culture'. After Bernie Sanders won the Nevada Democratic caucuses, liberal
icon and MSNBC stalwart Chris Matthews compared Sanders's victory to Nazi Germany's invasion of France. Immediately
after his comments, the leftist mob came after him, demanding that he be fired. This wasn't some neo-liberal
Never-Trumpster who had been masquerading as a Republican for the last two decades. [...] But you make one clumsy historical
analogy which implies America's leading Socialist might be as bad for America as the Nazi army was for France and suddenly
you're out of favor with your own constituency and you're required to grovel to keep your job.
Chris
Matthews facing calls to resign for comparing Sanders Nevada victory to Nazi invasion of France. MSNBC host
Chris Matthews is facing backlash online for equating Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders's win in the 2020 Nevada Democratic
caucuses to the Nazi regime's takeover of France. During a conversation with MSNBC anchor Brian Williams Saturday
night, the Hardball host likened the democratic socialist's decisive victory in Nevada to the Nazi's victory over France in
World War II.
TV Networks, Led
By CNN And MSNBC, Have Aired Misleading Bloomberg Ad More Than 70 Times. TV networks, led by CNN and MSNBC, have
aired a Michael Bloomberg ad more than 70 times in recent days in which the 2020 Democratic presidential hopeful falsely
said he led New York City through 9/11. "I led a complex, diverse city through 9/11, and I have common sense plans to
move America away from chaos to progress," Bloomberg said in a 30-second campaign ad called "It Won't Work." The
problem with the claim is that Bloomberg did not take over as mayor of the Big Apple until Jan. 1, 2002, several months
after terrorists flew airplanes into the World Trade Center towers in Manhattan. Rudolph Giuliani served as mayor when
the attacks occurred.
MSNBC's
Scarborough Distorts Axios Report on Trump Economy. Joe Scarborough of MSNBC's Morning Joe distorted an
Axios report on President Donald Trump's economy to credit former president Barack Obama. The show ran a segment
defending Obama's tweet congratulating himself for today's booming economy. Scarborough cited an Axios report on
Trump's economy to assert Feb. 18 that "[if] you look at the last ten presidents and their GDP growth throughout their
administrations, six in ten of those presidents — according to Axios yesterday, and well just according to
government statistics — actually had stronger economies than Donald Trump." But that's not what Axios' piece was
about. First, the Axios piece never mentioned ten presidents. The outlet's chart only measured six presidents'
average annualized GDP growth by presidential term (Trump included). Only five of the presidential terms shown in Axios'
chart are higher than Trump's first term. Second, the Axios story was that "Average economic growth under President
Trump has outpaced the growth under Barack Obama."
Fox Has Been "More Fair": Why Bernie's Team Has Had It With
MSNBC. Faiz Shakir had seen enough. As summer turned to fall, and the 2020 Democratic presidential race
entered the stretch run before the first caucuses and primaries, Shakir, who manages Bernie Sanders's campaign, approached
MSNBC president Phil Griffin to discuss his concerns with the network's treatment of the Vermont senator's second White House
bid. "We watched a ton of terrible coverage occurring and we thought we'd at least try to address it," he
recalled. For months, the campaign bristled at slights from MSNBC's stable of hosts and commentators. Jason
Johnson, an MSNBC contributor, predicted in January 2019 that Sanders would drop out by August, and network analyst Mimi
Rocah said in July that Sanders made her "skin crawl." On-screen graphics have omitted Sanders and misrepresented his
poll numbers, a trend that inspired a sendup from the Onion.
Coup Plotters
Fear the Quickening. [Scroll down] Lawmakers from the very same political party that seeks to
decriminalize basically everything — even creating lawless fiefdoms in major cities where noncitizens can break
the law with impunity after they illegally enter the country — are apoplectic that a quirky Boomer won't rot in
prison for a handful of process crimes. "This is one of those days in history you will tell your kids and your
grandkids what you were doing when this unspooled," Maddow, a Russian collusion truther who has made that claim at least a
few hundreds times over the past three years, ranted in her show's opening Tuesday night. "A rule of law crisis is
unfolding in the incumbent administration." This constitutional emergency, the most serious one since at least last week,
was prompted by Donald Trump's public criticism of Stone's original sentence which, according to the Left's newest conspiracy
theory, signaled to his attorney general that he'd better act fast.
Brain-Dead
MSNBC Anchor Wants 'Gerry-mandering' to Rig the Senate for Democrats After Impeachment. Did you hear that
senators who voted to convict the president represent 12 million more people than senators who voted to acquit? "In
case you missed it, majority doesn't always rule in this country," whined MSNBC anchor Katy Tur. "Forty-eight senators
voted to remove the president from office. Fifty-two voted to acquit. But the 48 actually represent 12 million
more voters than the senators who decided to keep Donald Trump in the White House." What's the relevance? To you,
me, and others with gray matter between their ears, none at all. Tur is actually using a false and dishonest analogy to
make an idiotic point. Fewer than 50 percent of voters in the states represented by senators who voted to convict Trump
bothered to vote at all in 2016. In some of those states, Trump lost by a small margin. The bottom line is that the
number 12 million assumes that every single resident of the state of California would have wanted to convict Trump.
This is as ignorant as saying that every single resident of Texas wanted him acquitted.
Seconds
After Speech Ends, Brian Williams Assails 'Dark,' 'Bizarre' State of the Union. Just seconds after Donald Trump
ended his third State of the Union address on Tuesday, — a speech that saw tributes to the heroics of our military
and awarding Rush Limbaugh the Presidential Medal of Freedom — MSNBC's Brian Williams, immediately bashed it as
"dark," "bizarre" and "unusual." The honesty-challenged journalist also scolded the "many points [that] differed from the
truth." Williams launched into attack mode, decrying: "Hard to put how unusual this was from the Speaker of the
House ending by pointedly ripping up the text of the speech, to the President here engaging for the second time the Chief
Justice who is sitting as judge at his impeachment trial, which continues tomorrow."
America's
Opinion Journalists Ranked: The Good, The Bad, and The Worst. Chuck Todd (NBC/MSNBC). You have to hand it
to Chuck Todd. Alone among the crackpots at MSNBC, he appears to have successfully brainwashed himself into actually believing
the claptrap he spouts. So it is that, eighteen months ago, he wrote a piece for the Atlantic titled "It's Time for the Press
to Stop Complaining — And to Start Fighting Back." The thrust of that opus is that the mainstream media always try
to be fair and accurate, and to correct errors, but that because of FOX News and the late Roger Ailes, they need to adopt a more
aggressive strategy in confronting their critics.
MSNBC
analyst: Iowa caucuses 'essentially the perfect example of systemic racism'. MSNBC political analyst
Zerlina Maxwell referred to the Iowa caucuses as the "perfect example of systemic racism." Reacting to reports of
mediocre turnout, Maxwell also took a shot at President Trump's hard-line immigration policies. "The Iowa caucus is
essentially the perfect example of systemic racism," Maxwell said Monday [2/3/2020] on MSNBC. "91% of the voters in Iowa
are white. The reason why you see a drop in turnout, I'm just speculating here, it could be perhaps that white children
are not in the cages."
MSNBC
Declares Russia the Winner of the Soleimani Strike. Given the many embarrassments the Iranian regime has
suffered over the last week it is hard to see the strike that took out Qasem Soleimani as anything but a win for the United
States, but that didn't stop MSNBC Live from declaring Russia to be the big winner, because of course it is. During the
segment, host Stephanie Ruhle asked political scientist and Washington Post columnist WSQAQ to comment how certain countries
have or have not benefited from the decision to take out Soleimani. After talking about Britain and Israel, Ruhle asked
about Russia.
Satire: Iran To Replace
State-Run Television With MSNBC. In a bid to cut costs and save time, Iran has announced that its 24/7 state
propaganda station will be replaced with an MSNBC broadcast. The decision to broadcast MSNBC instead of official state
propaganda came after an MSNBC reporter parroted the false claims of the Iranian government after yesterday's rocket
attacks. "Why spend so much time creating propaganda to brainwash our people when MSNBC could do it for us?" a
representative for Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting said to reporters.
Rachel
Maddow's Argument Against OAN Lawsuit: Don't Believe Her Words Are Fact. One America News (OAN) is in
court against MSNBC's Rachel Maddow in a $10 million lawsuit after Maddow said her conservative competitor "really, literally
is paid Russian propaganda." Now, Maddow is arguing in court that her words should not be taken as fact. Her
actual legal defense, put out in a motion by her lawyer Theodore Boutrous Jr., reads: "...the liberal host was clearly
offering up her 'own unique expression' of her views to capture what she saw as the 'ridiculous' nature of the undisputed
facts. Her comment, therefore, is a quintessential statement 'of rhetorical hyperbole, incapable of being proved true
or false.'"
Washington
Post Media Critic Blasts Rachel Maddow Over Steele Dossier. On Thursday [12/26/2019], Washington Post Media
Critic Erik Wemple slammed far-left MSNBC host Rachel Maddow, claiming that she "seemed to be rooting" for the veracity of
the now-infamous Steele Dossier before the document's credibility ultimately "fell apart." "Name a host on cable news
who has dug more deeply into Trump-Russia than MSNBC's Rachel Maddow," Wemple wrote. [...] Wemple systematically walked the
reader through a timeline of Maddow's on-air reporting from 2017-2018, during which Maddow repeatedly glommed onto snippets
of left-leaning reporting to tendentiously give off the impression to MSNBC viewers that the dossier was something other than
the salacious rumormongering that Department of Justice (DOJ) Inspector General has since confirmed it indeed was.
Rachel Maddow's Reckoning.
You may recall that back in March 2017, MSNBC host Rachel Maddow shocked the world by declaring "we've got Trump's tax
returns!" Then she later clarified she had obtained Donald Trump's 1040 form from ... 2005. Those who tuned in to
her program that evening had to watch a meandering 19-minute soliloquy and a commercial break before Maddow showed anything
from the tax return, which wasn't much. Her guest, David Cay Johnson, speculated that Trump may have also leaked nude
photos of Melania. That night was a massive letdown for those who believed Maddow's initial announcement, but it previewed
what we could expect from Maddow for the next three years, as the Washington Post's Erik Wemple lays out in exhaustive
detail in a review of Maddow's reporting and discussion of the Steele dossier. His assessment is scathing: [...]
New
Year Ahead: Nothing Will Help Them. The Washington Free Beacon put together a video of MSNBC's
most preposterous reports. [...] It showcased a guest who warned that if the Green New Deal wasn't immediately enacted
"people will die." (Congress didn't, people didn't die, except from unsanitary conditions in places like San Francisco
where street pooping is creating a public health menace.) Chris Hayes whined while defending Katie Hill, whose
unconventional sex life forced her resignation, "it really seems like the bad guys won here." Another featured guest
blamed the President for Epstein's death while in federal custody and the phony baloney Jussie Smollett hoax received almost
nonstop coverage.
The
Elephant in the Spin Room. As counselor to Vice President Dick Cheney and in management roles in Lamar
Alexander's and John McCain's failed presidential campaigns, Republican strategist Schmidt has done more to advance the
Left's political fortunes than almost any Democratic strategist. No one knows better than Steve Schmidt what it takes
to defeat Republicans. And now, fresh from helping Howard Schultz's presidential campaign implode, he's rejoined the
MSNBC team to bestow his analytical gift on the remaining Democratic contenders, such as they are. The panel listened
intently as Schmidt, in his authoritative monotone, insisted that former vice president Joe Biden had his strongest debate
performance yet, glossing over Biden's age-related word garbling and the monumental gaffe of his forgetting that the woman of
color two podia to his left was an African-American senator. Undeterred, Schmidt maintained that Biden doesn't actually
need to win any debates. He simply has to "survive" the debates.
Joy
Reid puts damper on 'American food holiday' Thanksgiving,' mocks your dumb pro-Trump family members. With the
Democratic Party about to come out from behind closed doors in the basement of the U.S. Capitol and take their impeachment
inquisition before cameras this week, MSNBC's Joy Reid beat the rush in assisting the party with their objective —
shaping public opinion. And doing so while attacking Thanksgiving. "We're just over two weeks away from one of
the most beloved American food holidays," the AM Joy host said Saturday in her opening remarks. "Thanksgiving, where
problematic actual history meets delicious cuisine and many of you will be heading home to spend time are family and friends,
eat a little too much and perhaps engage in a dreaded contentious political debate with your cranky uncle Rosco when he
starts yelling, 'Read the transcript!' at the dinner table, between bites of turkey and pumpkin pie. [...]"
'I'm
not struggling on anything': Mark Meadows interrupts MSNBC reporter to defend Trump. Rep. Mark Meadows
walked past an MSNBC reporter during a live segment before coming back and chastising the reporter after she said that
Republicans were finding it difficult to defend President Trump over impeachment proceedings. NBC News correspondent
Leigh Ann Caldwell attempted to get the North Carolina Republican to do a hallway interview with her, but he blew by with
some aides. "Hold on, we have Mark Meadows right here," Caldwell said as Meadows ignored her. "So he, he's
walking by right now," the reporter continued. "But Republicans are really struggling to defend the president."
Meadows then cut back into the frame to tell the reporter, "I'm not struggling on anything, so the Republicans are not
struggling on anything."
Media Mourn Katie Hill.
Rep. Katie Hill's (D., Calif.) resignation announcement this week had some members of the media in mourning over the
Democratic "rising star." MSNBC's Chris Hayes said it felt like the "bad guys" won, and another analyst called the
resignation a "tragedy." Much of the media coverage focused on Hill's allegation that she was the victim of "revenge
porn" distributed by her husband, whom she is divorcing.
The Editor says...
More details about the exceptionally poor judgement and self-inflicted troubles of Representative Katie Hill can be
found here, and it's really not the kind of behavior that
should be defended by TV reporters.
Citizens of Nowhere.
This piece in Commentary by Bruce Bawer ("The 'Global Citizen' Fraud") deserves wide attention. Citizenship is out;
patriotism is in disgrace; borders are passe. One Worldism and Global Citizenship are the order of the day. There
are few greater threats to our freedom. [...] Bawer points out that the world is a more diverse place than One Worlders want
to admit, and the values and practices of many countries are antithetical to ours. Bawer's piece is long and deserves
to be read in its entirety.
The 'Global Citizen'
Fraud. [T]he Global Citizen Festival was organized by a group called Global Citizen in partnership with firms
such as Johnson & Johnson, Proctor & Gamble, and Cisco Technologies. Rarely have so many heavyweight
corporations described their activities in such benign language: Verizon stated on the event's website that "we focus
our business and resources to uplift people and protect the planet." Who knew? Covering the festival
live, MSNBC hosts kept insisting — between interviews with Democratic politicians and recitation of DNC talking
points — that it was "not about politics." Hurricane Sandy, Central American drought, and the fall of
Venezuela, we were informed, were all caused by climate change. A Mexican official announced her country's new
"feminist foreign policy." The head of some activist group took credit for the decline in U.S. poverty.
MSNBC
panel: Gabbard didn't 'deny being a Russian asset'. A panel on MSNBC Live mocked Democratic
presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard for not explicitly denying Hillary Clinton's accusation that she is a Russian
asset. Clinton, 71, said that the Hawaii congresswoman is being groomed by Moscow to run as a third-party spoiler
candidate in 2020 to help President Trump win reelection. Gabbard has since hit back at the 2016 presidential
candidate. "One thing that was interesting about Tulsi Gabbard's response, I mean she went after Hillary Clinton
strong, she said she wasn't going to run as a third party candidate, she never denied being a Russian asset," Kimberly
Atkins of WBUR said while beginning to laugh on the show Saturday morning [10/19/2019].
'President
Isn't Telling the Truth': Nicolle Wallace Cuts Away from Press Conference. Wow! The MSNBC host of
Deadline: White House, Nicolle Wallace, declared President Trump to be a liar on Wednesday (how original) and
used that as an excuse to cut away from the televised press conference almost 24 hours after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
declared the House's formal attempt to impeach the President. Perhaps Trump's truth telling about Joe and Hunter Biden
was too much for her to tolerate. In any event, it was a stunning act of anti-journalism.
Watch
MSNBC Discuss Trump's Coming Execution. As I wrote this past weekend, that Trump-Ukraine scandal exploded into
a million pieces after about twelve hours of hysteria. In the end, there was no threat, no quid pro quo, and no real
meat to the story. The issue for many in the media and on the left, though, is that they had invested everything into this.
They truly felt this was finally it and that Trump would be taken down for using foreign aid money to force an investigation of Joe
Biden. That didn't happen and they were again left chasing the wind, suckers of fake news once more. The problem with
being so emotionally invested in all this is that it's hard to let go. And instead of just admitting their mistake, we
end up with lunacy like this from MSNBC: [...]
CNN:
Everything but the News. Just recently, MSNBC anchor Lawrence O'Donnell broke a story based on a single unnamed
source who said that Deutsche Bank documents (which the source had not seen) would soon prove that Russian oligarchs had
co-signed a loan application for Donald Trump — O'Donnell was apparently trying to resurrect the Russian-collusion
zombie. The story was discredited within 24 hours by denials from the bank — as O'Donnell did his part to
destroy what was left of the credibility of progressive cable news.
One
America News Network files $10 million defamation lawsuit against Rachel Maddow, MSNBC, and corporate parents.
President Trump isn't the only one who hits back. The parent of the scrappy conservative news outlet One America News
Network (OANN), Herring Networks, has filed a lawsuit against Rachel Maddow, MSNBC, and its corporate parents for
defamation. The entire statement by the plaintiff's attorneys is embedded below, but this constitutes the heart of the
matter, and it goes beyond mere defamation: [...]
One
America News Network Files $10 Million Defamation Lawsuit Against MSNBC's Rachel Maddow. One America News
Network (OANN) filed a $10 million defamation lawsuit Monday [9/9/2019] against MSNBC's Rachel Maddow, alleging that the host
"maliciously and recklessly" suggested on the air that the conservative news channel is a paid Russian state propaganda
outlet. In addition to Maddow, OANN is suing MSNBC, Comcast Corporation and NBC Universal for defamation. Maddow
based her claims on a Daily Beast report alleging that OANN's Kristian Rouz is a "Russian national on the payroll of the
Kremlin's official propaganda outlet, Sputnik."
Conservative
Network Files $10M Defamation Lawsuit Against Rachel Maddow, MSNBC. The owner of right-leaning cable news
channel One America News Network (OANN) has filed a defamation lawsuit against Rachel Maddow and others claiming that the
46-year-old liberal commentator "maliciously and recklessly" smeared the network as a Russian state propaganda outlet.
In a press release obtained by Law&Crime, attorneys for OANN's owner Herrring Networks, Inc. said they filed a $10 million
defamation lawsuit against Maddow, Comcast Corporation, NBC Universal and MSNBC in a California federal court. The lawsuit
tracks a series of longstanding grievances between OANN and Comcast.
A
Shameless Lying MSNBC Hack is the Face of the Media. [Scroll down] Rachel Maddow had not bothered to
find out anything about [Steven] Menashi before trying to destroy him. All that mattered were two things. First,
that Menashi was a Trump nominee, making him fair game for any lie, smear and slander. And second, that Maddow was
sinking in the ratings and needed help. Going after Menashi might not turn things around, but the smear campaign might
stop the bleeding. Rachel Maddow was trying to destroy a good man to keep Bank of America advertising on her show.
MSNBC
'Republican' Urges People To Target NRA Board Members: 'Go After Their Businesses'. Isn't it funny how even the
supposed conservatives on many liberal networks embrace the progressive view on multiple issues? Over at MSNBC, supposed
Republican Susan Del Percio, recently urged people to target board members of the NRA and even target their businesses.
MSNBC
and NY Times don't let facts get in way of anti-Trump stories — Fiction is more interesting. MSNBC
host Lawrence O'Donnell, who used to write for the fictional TV show "West Wing," proved this week that he hasn't lost his
touch. He showed that he's not limited to discussing real news — he can make it up and report his fictional
version as if it were real. Like much of what is wrong with the media, it began with a tweet. And then O'Donnell
repeated his fictional claim on MSNBC Tuesday night. In on-air conversation with Rachel Maddow, whose show immediately
precedes his, O'Donnell said he had information about how years ago businessman Donald Trump was "able to obtain loans when
no one else would loan him money."
Deep
thoughts from MSNBC's Chris Hayes on the Constitution. Chris Hayes of MSNBC apparently is a big fan of tautology,
delivering one of the stupidest lines of recent cable news memory. His studio audience failed to understand the fatuousness
of this claim about the Electoral College: "If it wasn't [sic] in the Constitution specifically for the presidency, it
would be unconstitutional."
Chris
Hayes On The Electoral College: 'If It Wasn't Specifically In The Constitution... It Would Be Unconstitutional'. MSNBC
host Chris Hayes attempted to again sow distrust in the Electoral College during his show Friday night [8/30/2019], but his comments
have earned mockery on social media. While speaking to an "All In With Chris Hayes" audience, the host suggested that the
Electoral College — America's system for selecting its president since the Constitution was written — is
unconstitutional. "The weirdest thing about the electoral college is the fact that if it wasn't specifically in the Constitution
for the presidency, it would be unconstitutional," Hayes said. The host briefly paused and looked to the audience, as if
this was supposed to be an applause line.
Hemingway:
Months After Mueller Report, Media Russia Truthers Are Embarrassing And Sad. After being threatened with legal
action from the Trump Organization, MSNBC host Lawrence O'Donnell apologized and retracted his reporting on Wednesday night's
show for peddling unverified information about President Trump's tax returns and connections to Russia. "Tonight, we
are retracting the story," he said in his opening monologue. "I should not have said it on air or posted it on
Twitter. I was wrong to do so." An MSNBC spokesperson declined to specify what action, if any, the network
or NBC News might take as a result of O'Donnell's false reporting.
Fake
news: NBC having a very bad week as correspondents and hosts botch TWO Trump stories. First, MSNBC host
Lawrence O'Donnell was forced to apologize for reporting that an "anonymous source" claimed that Russian oligarchs co-signed
loans that Trump, the private businessman, took out with Deutsche Bank after his legal team responded with a threat to sue
him and his network. Next, MSNBC has backed away from claims that "children born to U.S. service members outside of the
U.S. will no longer be automatically considered citizens. Parents will have to apply for citizenship for their children
in those situations." That was tweeted by Ken Dilanian, an NBC News correspondent who covers national security, on Wednesday
afternoon [8/28/2019]. Less than an hour later, he issued a correction.
Donald
Trump Mocks MSNBC's 'Crazy Lawrence O'Donnell' After Embarrassing Retraction. President Donald Trump ridiculed
MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell after the prime time anchor publicly retracted and apologized for an erroneous report on Wednesday
[8/28/2019]. [...] O'Donnell publicly retracted the report on Wednesday during his show after Trump's attorney's threatened a
lawsuit. "I did not go through the rigorous verification and standards process here at MSNBC before repeating what I
heard from my source," he said.
MSNBC's
O'Donnell: I Apologize for and Retract Trump Loan Story. On Wednesday's [8/28/2019] broadcast of MSNBC's
"The Last Word," host Lawrence O'Donnell retracted and apologized for a report that President Trump had received loans that
were co-signed by Russian oligarchs.
MSNBC's
Lawrence O'Donnell Lets Conspiracy Spread Online After TV Retraction. Although MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell
claims to have retracted his absurd and reckless story about President Trump receiving loans co-signed by Russian oligarchs
close to Vladimir Putin, even his claim of a retraction was fake news. As of this writing [8/29/2019], some 12 hours
after he claimed "we are retracting the story," the phony story lives on through social media.
Eric
Trump: Trump Organization taking legal action over MSNBC host Lawrence O'Donnell's 'reckless attempt to slander
family'. Eric Trump vowed that the Trump Organization will take legal action against MSNBC and Lawrence
O'Donnell after the left-leaning host aired a singled-sourced, unverified report that President Trump had loans co-signed by
Russian oligarchs. "This was a reckless attempt to slander our family and smear a great company. Apologies are
not enough when the true intent was solely to damage and cause harm. As a company, we will be taking legal
action. This unethical behavior has to stop. @Lawrence @MSNBC," Eric Trump tweeted Wednesday night [8/28/2019].
The threat of legal action came after the MSNBC host apologized earlier in the evening for what he called an "error in judgment"
during his show on Tuesday night.
'Sources Say'. You could justify
reporting almost anything by the nonexistent "journalism ethics" of Lawrence O'Donnell. On live TV Tuesday night, the
MSNBC host told his audience that Donald Trump had obtained loans from Deutsche Bank co-signed by "Russian billionaires with
ties to Vladimir Putin." The basis for this claim, according to O'Donnell, was "a single source close to Deutsche Bank."
O'Donnell then added an interesting caveat: "If true..." Yes, of course. It would be a big scoop,
if true.
Lawrence
O'Donnell says he made 'an error in judgment' by reporting unverified Trump-Russia bombshell. MSNBC prime-time
anchor Lawrence O'Donnell issued an apology for running with a single-sourced unverified claim about President Trump and
Deutsche Bank. "Last night I made an error in judgment by reporting an item about the president's finances that didn't
go through our rigorous verification and standards process," he tweeted on Wednesday. "I shouldn't have reported it and
I was wrong to discuss it on the air. I will address the issue on my show tonight."
Why
NBC, MSNBC's Reporting on The Epoch Times Is Textbook Fake News. As you know, The Epoch Times is a proudly
independent news organization dedicated to truthful reporting. Thanks to your support, we are now America's fastest-growing
newspaper. It appears, however, that not everyone is thrilled with our growth and our dedication to restoring honest
journalism. On Aug. 20, NBC News and MSNBC dedicated a good amount of their time to The Epoch Times in an attempt
to discredit us. We at The Epoch Times were surprised ourselves at witnessing what appears to be a new low that media
are willing to drop to in an effort to quash voices they don't agree with.
MSNBC's
Ruhle: A Recession Would Be 'Normal' and 'OK'. Monday [8/19/2019] amid rumblings of the United States
facing a potential recession, "MSNBC Live" commentator Stephanie Ruhle defended recessions, calling them "a normal part of
economic activity." While the White House is shooting down the notion of an upcoming recession, Ruhle declared it
"about time we get a recession."
Unhinged
MSNBCers Keep Comparing Trump to Hitler. MSNBC's anchors from Joe Scarborough to Donny Deutsch are constantly
comparing President Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler. It doesn't matter the topic. It could be Trump's criticism of
"The Squad," or border security, or just because it's a Tuesday. Regardless, they will find a way to say Donald Trump
is LITERALLY Hitler. From morning (MSNBC's Morning Joe) to afternoon (MSNBC's Deadline: White
House) to evening (MSNBC's Saturday Night Politics) there isn't a time of day where you can't find a MSNBCer who
has compared the President to history's worst monster. The following is just month-long sample of MSNBC hosts comparing
Trump to Hitler: [Video clip]
Nicolle
Wallace Apologizes for Saying Trump Is 'Talking About Exterminating Latinos'. On Tuesday night [8/6/2019],
failed McCain/Palin campaign official, former Republican, and MSNBC's Deadline: White House host Nicolle Wallace
apologized for claiming during Monday's show that President Donald Trump has been "talking about exterminating Latinos."
MSNBC
host apologizes after guest said 'natural conclusion' of Trump's rhetoric could lead to an 'extermination' of Latinos.
MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace issued an apology Tuesday evening over remarks made during a panel discussion stemming from a guest's
suggestion that President Trump has been "talking about exterminating Latinos." On Monday [8/5/2019], Wallace led a
conversation where USA Today opinion columnist Raul Reyes slammed Trump's remarks condemning white supremacy since he had
"basically declared open season on Latinos" during his entire presidency.
'We
are in a cold civil war': MSNBC commentator says terms like 'illegal immigrant' inspire mass shootings. MSNBC's
Eddie Glaude debated with former Republican North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory over who should bear the blame for inspiring
the recent mass shootings in the United States. Glaude argued Sunday [8/4/2019] on Meet the Press that terms
such as "illegal immigrant" are divisive and fuel white nationalists to commit acts of violence.
Fact
Check: MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell Claims 'Squad' Members Are Not Socialists. MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell claimed
on Thursday [7/18/2019] that members of the "Squad" are not socialists, despite the fact that two of them have explicitly identified
as such. [...] "Squad" members Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) are both members of
the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), which explicitly states that "democracy and socialism go hand in hand."
The Democratic Socialists of America Facebook page even congratulated Tlaib on her primary victory last year.
MSNBC's
Andrea Mitchell called out for falsely claiming 'not a single' member of the 'squad' is a socialist.
Fact-challenged Andrea Mitchell is under fire for missing the obvious about Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and the other
progressive congresswomen of "The Squad." The MSNBC anchor struggled to accept Republicans, including President Trump
during his campaign rally this week, calling the women "socialists," denying it was so during a panel discussion on "Andrea
Mitchell Reports" Thursday [7/18/2019].
Kasie
Hunt Spreads Fake News Biden's Segregationist Pals Were 'Republicans'. MSNBC's Kasie Hunt misidentified Joe
Biden's Democrat segregationist pals on Wednesday [6/19/2019] as Republicans. While teasing a segment about the uproar
over the former vice president bragging about being able to do business with racist segregationists, Hunt, a far-left
activist and MSNBC hostess, spread this fake news: [...]
Impeachment
Fever: Democrats whip themselves into a frenzy. [Scroll down] Meanwhile, over at the Democrats' top
propaganda arm, MSNBC, we have guests complaining that it's impossible to get onto the network unless they promise to talk
about impeachment. No other topic is to be broached. And for those who do, "no TV for you." CNN is beating
the drum hard for impeachment, too, giving lots of airtime to professors and more professors calling for it.
Continuing
plunge of CNN, MSNBC ratings reveals that fake news is a bad business strategy. The catastrophic ratings
decline for both CNN and MSNBC was no temporary blip following publication of the Mueller report. Both cable news
outlets had heavily promoted the hoax of Russian collusion with the Trump administration, teasing the hopes of Trump-haters
for impeachment and prosecution for treason. Now, those disappointed viewers have gone away, and continue to stay away.
MSNBC
Suggests No One Is Trying To Take Our Guns. Here's Their Correction. In true leftist fashion, the
Democrats have been utilizing the New Zealand shooting as a way to push the issue of gun control in the United States.
MSNBC's Ali Velshi is one such individual, who took a moment to push the issue on his show, kicking off the festivities by
claiming that "nobody in America has suggested banning any guns." Only that's incredibly false. Democrats have
been trying to take our guns away for some time, both on the voter, activist, and lawmaker level. A perfect example is
a fervor to strip America of its gun rights after the Parkland shooting, as marchers held out signs that promoted the removal
of our right to bear arms by banning guns.
How
Joe and Mika have been tricking 'Morning Joe' audience. Married MSNBC co-anchors Joe Scarborough and Mika
Brzezinski are reportedly making it look like they're broadcasting their show "Morning Joe" from different locations, when
they're actually traveling together. Fans have noticed that the duo have not been broadcasting their show from New York
lately — and they appear to be co-hosting from two Washington, DC, locations, judging from different Beltway
backdrops behind each anchor. But Washington Post reporter Paul Farhi said on Twitter of Scarborough and Brzezinski:
"They're broadcasting from a home studio in Jupiter [Florida]. And there's no formal set in their home studio, just a
couple of (Washington) backdrops. Thus, a wide shot is out of the question."
MSNBC's
Nicolle Wallace: 'There isn't a strain of racism on the left'. MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace claimed on Tuesday
that only one side of the aisle has problems dealing with racism. [...] Wallace, who previously served under President George
W. Bush and was a senior advisor on Sen. John McCain's 2008 presidential campaign, weighed in on [Rep. Steve] King's
controversial comments by taking aim at the entire party. "Part of the problem is we think — this does not have
a parallel on the left. It doesn't. There isn't. There isn't a strain of racism on the left. So I
think that this gets brushed under the rug. People sort of tolerate — it's been normalized," Wallace told the
panel. "Like you just said, they don't have anywhere else to go, so they attach to the Republican Party. The
Republican Party doesn't have to let them. How — how do — how do Republicans sort of get back to
doing something decent?" "They would have to completely reinvent the party," former Obama official Matthew Miller responded.
MSNBC
Host: 'There Isn't a Strain of Racism on the Left'. MSNBC anchor Nicolle Wallace said there is no strain of
racism on the left the same day the Democratic National Committee had to pull out of the Women's March because of an
anti-Semitism scandal. Wallace's program "Deadline: White House" devoted a segment to Rep. Steve King's
remark about wishing "white supremacy" was not considered offensive. Republicans voted unanimously to condemn white
supremacy today but Wallace was laser-focused on trashing every member of her former party for the comment. "This does
not have a parallel on the left. There just — it doesn't. There isn't. There isn't a strain of racism
on the left. I don't — so I think that this gets brushed under the rug. People sort of tolerate —
it's been normalized," Wallace said. "How do Republicans sort of get back to doing something decent?"
The Editor says...
Examples of black racism can be found here. The "soft bigotry of
low expectations" and other aspects of the shabby treatment of minorities by those on the left can be
found here
What did Mr. King say that was racist? MSNBC's
Nicolle Wallace: 'There isn't a strain of racism on the left'. Last week, Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, landed
himself in hot water for racist remarks he made during an interview with the New York Times. "White nationalist, white
supremacist, Western civilization — how did that language become offensive? Why did I sit in classes
teaching me about the merits of our history and our civilization?" King asked.
Liberal
media tell us the left is right, and the right is wrong. "Morning Joe" brought MSNBC host Al Sharpton on to blast Trump for anti-Semitism.
There's only one problem with that. Back when Scarborough was an actual Republican and serving in Congress, he proposed a resolution:
"Condemning the racist and anti-Semitic views of the Reverend Al Sharpton." The major media would have been all over it if a conservative
had so openly backtracked. But it got almost no attention because Scarborough works for MSNBC. The press is OK with how much he has to
contort himself to fit in the network's world view. They are also OK that MSNBC employs Sharpton as a host. Media cover-ups directly
benefit politicians with the letter "D" after their name.
MSNBC
Host Incorrectly Claims Broward County Election Supervisor Is a Republican. MSNBC host Andrea Mitchell on
Monday [11/12/2018] claimed Florida's Broward County election supervisor Brenda Snipes is a Republican, despite the fact she
is a Democrat. "We should also point out that Brenda Snipes in Broward County is a Republican appointed by former
governor, then-Governor Jeb Bush," Mitchell said in a clip flagged by Mediaite. "So, she was put in by a Republican
governor after the mess that we all remember from 2000. And she's hardly a Democratic official, or someone doing the
bidding of the Democratic candidates there." Snipes self-identifies as a Democrat and has run as a Democrat for her
current position.
MSNBC
Freaks: Kavanaugh Confirmation Means Racism, 'Back to the '50s'. Just seconds after Brett Kavanaugh was
confirmed to the United States Supreme Court, MSNBC hosts suffered a meltdown, raging against a country founded on "the idea
that being a free white" man gives you all the power. Host Joy Reid suggested that feeling returned on Saturday as
Mitch McConnell imposed a form of tyranny. Reid slimed, "Mitch McConnell has decided that order means that people like
Mitch McConnell, men like him rule. He believes in rule. Democrats tend to believe in governing.
Republicans believe in rule."
MSNBC
Keeps Lying About the Dossier Being Corroborated. An MSNBC panelist named Paul Butler, a Georgetown Professor,
stated on the Joy Reid show that the Steele dossier "keeps getting corroborated" by Special Counsel Robert Mueller and
reporters. That is not at all true. Nothing of significance has been confirmed. Even Jim Comey said the FBI
could not verify the document. Earlier this week, Lanny Davis, the Clinton mob lawyer now representing Cohen, asserted
that the dossier's allegations about Cohen are "100 percent" false.
NY
Times Columnist: Trump 'Would Certainly Like to' Murder People Without Due Process. New York Times columnist
Michelle Goldberg argued with her fellow panelists on MSNBC's "Meet the Press Daily" Friday [8/17/2018] about whether President Donald
Trump is the leader of the free world or an aspiring despot. RealClearPolitics reporter Caitlin Huey-Burns was criticizing
Trump's communication strategy when she called him "the leader of the free world." Goldberg interjected to say that, actually,
German Chancellor Angela Merkel is the leader of the free world. "He's not the leader of the free world, but, sorry," Goldberg
said. "By default he's the leader of the free world," Commentary magazine editor John Podhoretz replied. "Angela
Merkel is the leader of the free world," Goldberg said, while Podhoretz laughed.
Katy
Tur Makes False Statement About GOP Then Admits She's Clueless. MSNBC's Katy Tur falsely claimed on Monday
[7/30/2018] that the Republican Party was opposed to arming Ukraine in their opposition of Russia and later admitted she
didn't know what she was talking about after she was corrected on air.
MSNBC
lies in support of Hillary's candidacy documented and savaged — from the left. NBC, a subsidiary of
Comcast, and its cable news affiliate MSNBC have become among the fiercest antagonists of President Trump. Even before
his election, they were shameless in shilling for Hillary Clinton's candidacy. Conservatives know this quite well, but
now comes documentation from the left of the outright lies, not just permitted, but encouraged and rewarded by the cable
outlet, and tolerated by its corporate parents. Glenn Greenwald, of the Intercept, documents an attempt to smear
left-wing presidential candidate Jill Stein. The presumption has to be that votes for Stein would otherwise have gone
to Hillary, so hobbling her with lies would also hurt the prospects of electoral success of Donald Trump.
Watch:
MSNBC Analysts Claim Trump Admin Is Operating Concentration Camps. Two MSNBC analysts falsely claimed on Friday
[6/15/2018] that the Trump administration is operating concentration camps for illegal immigrant children who are separated
from their parents. Guests Stephanie Cutter and Michael Steele made the remarks, which went completely unchallenged by
host Stephanie Ruhle. Cutter, who was a high-level official in Barack Obama's 2012 presidential campaign, claimed that
what the Trump administration is doing was not the law, just merely their "interpretation" of the law.
'Morning
Joe' contemplates Trump's mental 'stability' after dry-mouth speech. The panel on MSNBC's "Morning Joe"
suggested Thursday [12/7/2017] that President Trump is suffering from diminished mental capacity after he delivered a speech
and slurred some of his words toward the end. Republican strategist and MSNBC contributor Steve Schmidt, a regular on
the show, said Trump appeared to have an "impairment" and called it "chilling" to watch. "This is not the person that
we knew even three years ago. ... There's a remarkable change," said host Joe Scarborough. "He seemed like he was
almost hanging on to the prompter and hanging on to the words," co-host Mika Brzezinski said. "Something, I don't know.
... There was a struggle happening."
MSNBC
Spins Pro-Abortion Alabama Democrat as 'Conservative'. MSNBC journalists on Tuesday rushed to the defense of
the Democrat in Alabama's Senate race, spinning Doug Jones as "moderate" and "conservative." This despite his firm support
for abortion and some gun control policies.
Fake live news: 'Morning
Joe' caught airing pretaped show the day after Thanksgiving. The "Morning Joe" hosts were talking turkey the
day after Thanksgiving, but all the viewers heard was bull. "Day after Thanksgiving. Woo! I'm stuffed!"
host Mika Brzezinski said to open the show. "A great Thanksgiving," Joe Scarborough replied before they both offered a
few awkward chuckles. The live MSNBC show — which airs five days a week — seemed normal at first,
but a few fans were quick to notice it wasn't unfolding in real-time.
The Editor says...
Recorded TV shows that are marketed as "live" are plentiful, and they are nothing new.
For example, the Wendy Williams show, Live with Kelly (delayed in some markets), Access Hollywood Live, TMZ Live. About half of
your local TV news programs are pre-produced. Even a purported "live" report from the field is usually just an introduction to
a pre-produced news package or interview. That's not necessarily a bad thing. If the local news show was all live, it would
be dreadfully boring and repetitive, and the local TV station would go broke because of the labor costs.
MSNBC's
Brian Williams Encourages Viewers to Share Storm Photos, 'Pretend' They're Their Own. MSNBC's The 11th
Hour host Brian Williams is probably regretting a flippant comment he made during the network's live coverage of Hurricane
Irma on Sunday afternoon [9/10/2017], after it earned him mockery online. While discussing a photo reporters in Tampa,
Florida had taken of the intense winds, Williams instructed Florida viewers to not take similar photos of their own.
Instead, he suggested they steal this photo, share it, and "pretend you shot it." "We'll look the other way," he
helpfully added.
MSNBC Contributor: Hillary
Lost Because Obama Is Black. MSNBC contributor Wendy Sherman believes that Hillary Clinton may have lost the election because it was too hard for
America to elect the first female president directly after the first black president. Sherman was on a panel at the Aspen Ideas Festival discussing modern
political technology when she segued into the bizarre comment.
MSNBC
Anchor: Planned Parenthood 'A Critical Tool For Helping Saving Lives'. MSNBC anchor Ali Velshi spent
several minutes Tuesday heralding Planned Parenthood as "a critical tool for helping saving lives" and said "I'm not an
advocate" before having Planned Parenthood's Director of Constituency Communications come on to defend the organization.
Guilt
By Association: Mitchell Sneers That Montana Assault Is 'Extension' of Trump. Guilt by association.
That's what Andrea Mitchell believes. Despite the fact that Donald Trump is on another continent, the Andrea
Mitchell Reports anchor thinks that the assault against a journalist by a Montana congressional candidate is an
"extension" of the President. Talking about Greg Gianforte's attack on Guardian reporter Ben Jacobs, the MSNBC
host connected, "There is so much hostility, frankly, to the press, a lot of it generated by the Donald Trump rallies."
NPR,
Uncorked on MSNBC: 'Right Wing Media' 'Brainwashed' People to Believe Lies. The liberal media threw a proverbial
hissy fit Monday [11/28/2016] in response to President-Elect Donald Trump's dubious claim that millions of votes were cast
illegally. While seeming pretend that Trump would be the first president ever to tell a lie, public radio host Bob
Garfield went on a long winded tirade, on MSNBC's All In, railing against the "Right wing media." "The people who
get it and we at the mainstream media, you know, get the straight dope but about half the electorate is getting their information
from other sources, none credible," he whined. The ranting Garfield blamed the success of "right wing media" on what he called
"330 million individual echo chambers," which he claimed helped to insulate people from news they don't want to hear. He
didn't seem to realize that his belief works both ways, especially when it's evident that left does not want to consider another
perspective on nearly everything.
NBC
News' Pete Williams Reports FBI 'Really Isn't' Conducting Clinton Foundation Investigation. Appearing on
MSNBC's MTP Daily today, NBC News' justice correspondent Pete Williams refuted much of the reporting from Wall
Street Journal and Fox News regarding a likely indictment regarding an FBI investigation into the Clinton
Foundation. Fox's Bret Baier later backed off slightly, saying the indictment comment was "inartfully answered."
Speaking to host Chuck Todd, Williams claimed that via his own law enforcement sources, there doesn't actually appear to be
much of an investigation, let alone one that will result in indictments.
Andrea
Mitchell Falsely Claims Donna Brazile Leak Story Has Been 'Completely Knocked Down' [Video]. In the face of all
evidence to the contrary, MSNBC host Andrea Mitchell claimed on Thursday [10/20/2016] that allegations that Democratic National Committee
chair Donna Brazile leaked town hall questions to the Clinton campaign have been "completely knocked down." Mitchell was
discussing references Donald Trump made on Thursday to leaked debate and town hall questions. Trump claimed on Twitter
that questions from Wednesday's debate, moderated by Fox News' Christopher Wallace, were provided to the Clinton campaign.
On Thursday, he referred to the scandal involving Brazile and her apparent leaking of a CNN/TV One town hall question asked of
Clinton in March.
MSNBC
host insists Clinton created jobs. An MSNBC news anchor insisted on Friday that Hillary Clinton has a record of
job creation that's at least more than "zero," but then struggled to point to any evidence of her claim. The anchor,
Stephanie Ruhle, interviewed Arkansas Attorney General Leslie Rutledge, a Donald Trump supporter, who said Trump created
"thousands and thousands" of jobs as a businessman. "How many jobs has Hillary Clinton created?" asked Rutledge.
"Zero is the answer. Zero jobs for any woman. Zero jobs for any man, for that matter. So, she has zero
credibility when it comes to job creation."
MSNBC
Anchor Falsely Claims Trump Has Never Been on Stage With a Female Candidate. MSNBC anchor Kate Snow falsely
claimed in an interview Monday that Donald Trump has never appeared on a debate stage with a woman. [...] Snow appeared have
forgotten about Carly Fiorina's presence on the Republican debate stage during the primary process. Fiorina
participated in four debates with Donald Trump and the rest of the GOP field.
Seriously?
New Chris Matthews Ad Touts Liberal's 'Tough Questions'. In case you weren't aware, the liberal Chris Matthews
is the king of the "tough questions." That's according to a new ad airing on MSNBC. In the spot, Matthews brags, "I
take it as my job not to just ask the tough questions... but to get answers to them." [...] However, in January of 2016, the
Hardball host conducted a 20 minute softball interview with Hillary Clinton. It included "questions" such as this
one: "Well, New York came and fell in love with you and said, 'We like you, come up here, live up here and be our senator.'"
Brian
Williams: U.S. Is 'The Only Nation to Have Used' Nuclear Weapons 'In Anger'. MSNBC breaking news host and
ex-NBC Nightly News anchor Brian Williams was allowed out on MSNBC's airwaves early Friday afternoon [5/27/2016] to
discuss President Obama's visit to Hiroshima so he could resurrect a taped report that aired in 2005 on the 60th anniversary
of the nuclear bomb's dropping on the Japanese city. In the course of discussing the event afterward, though, Williams
threw some shade in the direction of the U.S. military and then-President Harry Truman by complaining that "we're the only
nation to have used them in anger" against the horrifying Axis Powers member.
Apparently,
no one at MSNBC pays taxes. Democrats are fond of accusing Republicans of being hypocrites
on a variety of issues, but particularly when it comes to tax policy. The liberal comedian Bill Maher
recently claimed that Republicans expose themselves to this critique when they champion the value of hard
work and perseverance while simultaneously opposing the inheritance tax.
Liberal
Hypocrites At MSNBC Don't Pay Their Taxes. For typical Americans who paid all their taxes upfront,
Friday [4/24/2015] is Tax Freedom Day. But for several hosts at MSNBC, Tax Freedom Day came much sooner.
MSNBC's
Touré Has the Taxman on His Case. Touré Neblett, co-host of MSNBC's The
Cycle, owes more than $59,000 in taxes, according to public records reviewed by National Review. In
September 2013, New York issued a state tax warrant to Neblett and his wife, Rita Nakouzi, for $46,862.68.
Six months later, the state issued an additional warrant to the couple for $12,849.87.
Four
MSNBC Stars Do Not Pay Their Taxes. National Review's Jillian Kay Melchior reported Wednesday
[4/22/2015] that, along with Al Sharpton and Melissa Harris-Perry, two more MSNBC stars are not paying their
fair share of taxes. Touré Neblett, co-host of "The Cycle" owes the IRS a cool $59,000.
Joy-Ann Reid, a former anchor and now a regular contributor to the "Lien" Forward network, owes New York
almost $5,000 in back taxes. As we reported last week, Melissa Harris-Perry owes the IRS $70,000.
Al Sharpton's tax bill is upwards of $3-$4 million.
MSNBC
fails to address tax problems of hosts. National Review reported today that MSNBC's
Touré, who co-hosts the network's afternoon program "The Cycle," owes nearly $60,000 in taxes
to New York State, according to a pair of tax warrants that the magazine found. And as the story
fully noted, there's a trend afoot here: [...]
MSNBC's
Tax Delinquents Lecture Audience on Taxes. MSNBC, the liberal network that advocates
at every turn for a progressive revenue system, is home to four tax delinquents who have all
lectured their audience about tax fairness over the years.
Chris
Matthews Says 'Unemployment Was Well Past 10%' When Obama Took Office — It Was Only 7.8%. "When your guy left town,
Dubya — who nobody asked him to come back by the way at the Republican convention — unemployment was well past ten percent
and skyrocketing." So falsely said MSNBC's Chris Matthews to conservative talk radio host Roger Hedgecock on HBO's Real Time
Friday [9/21/2012].
NBC
NBC
Reporter: It's 'Obviously a Possibility' Shooter Might Have Targeted Trump for Not Being
'Conservative Enough'. NBC News correspondent Tom Winter theorized the man police say
tried to kill former President Donald Trump in Pennsylvania on Saturday might have targeted him for
not being "conservative enough." Winter joined MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell on Sunday's edition of
Alex Witt Reports during the network's ongoing coverage of the assassination attempt against
Trump that left a Trump supporter dead, the former president with a graze wound to the ear, and two
others wounded.
Ronna
McDaniel and the Peacock Network. Is there any rational person who still believes
that the National Broadcasting Company is in any way a reliable source of news? The network
of Chet Huntley, David Brinkley, Harry Reasoner, Roger Mudd, and Tom Brokaw has now abandoned all
pretense of impartiality. This is thanks to their atrocious treatment of former RNC chair
Ronna McDaniel. It has been quite obvious that all of the original networks tilt to the Left
and have done so quietly for many years if not decades. But NBC is unique in that it also
produces MSNBC, an unabashedly leftist news/commentary product. Its commentators often move
back and forth between the main network and the upstart. The hiring of Ms. McDaniel by
NBC proper was probably considered a good move to maintain a thin veneer of bipartisanship.
Welker
Lets Adam Schiff Answer at Length, But Lindsey Graham Gets the But! But!
But!. It's clear that NBC Meet the Press host Kristen Welker has two modes of
operation: Democrats get polite questioning, often about internal party matters, while
Republicans get hammered with rough questions and predictably interrupted with bickering.
There was a dramatic contrast on Sunday between Welker's polite approach to Rep. Adam Schiff
(D-Calif.) and her incessant bickering with Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.). I'll throw
some math in. Schiff received six questions in his interview, and he spoke for
827 words. That's about 138 words per answer. He had no reason to fear Welker
jumping in. Here's the agenda of questions, which is like two Democrats chatting: [...]
NBC dishonestly conflates the political career of Joe Biden with the presidency itself. 'Presidency
In Peril': NBC's Meet The Press Panics Over New Poll. I'm old enough to remember when
the late, great Rush Limbaugh referred to NBC's Sunday political affairs show as Meet the
Depressed. A return to that moniker might be in order after today's opening segment on the
latest NBC News poll, showing former President Donald Trump opening a five-point lead over
incumbent President Joe Biden and triggering a panic over Biden's "presidency in peril".
Media
hatred and censorship of Christians. Sensational rookie quarterback C.J. Stroud
appeared for an interview over the weekend immediately after leading his Houston Texans to a
playoff win. The exhausted, battered, victorious 22-year-old opened with these words:
"First and foremost, I just want to give all glory to my Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ." The
game was carried by NBC. They posted Stroud's postgame interview but, predictably, edited out his
opening statement — the very statement that the player himself said was "first and
foremost" to him and his terrific game. Stroud is Black. It used to be that liberals
tolerated Black displays of religion because they thought such displays were cute, as in Black
churches with people dancing in the aisle and shouting "Hallelujah!" Never mind that such
displays were profound and spiritual for the Black participants; liberals condescendingly tolerated
them only because they saw them as something like a kindergarten Christmas play. But as
liberals drifted toward outright leftism and now censorious wokism, they stopped tolerating
Christian displays even if the displays are by kindergarteners or Blacks. The wokesters running
the media have decided Christianity is evil and Christian verses and beliefs are hate speech.
NBC
News Covers for Bill Clinton. The mainstream media is now openly defending the
alleged child sex abusers. The anchor on NBC News defended Bill Clinton on Wednesday night
after legal documents were released that show he likes young girls on Epstein Island.
Our Dysfunctional
Press. Meet the Press, one of TV's most iconic news programs, transitioned to a new
host on September 17th. That morning saw Kristen Welker anchor her first show after
succeeding long-time host, Chuck Todd. It would be easy to take the position that it would be
Tweedle-dee, Tweedle-dum. But in the spirit of writing this column and being part of the
journalist world, I committed to giving her a shot. She was able to book former President
Donald Trump for her first show, no question a big "get." Trump is difficult to watch as a
guest because of his repetitive rhetoric and chest pounding, so watching was indeed a
commitment. He was a prince compared to her. It wasn't just that she dripped with
disdain for Trump. That would be expected since she is aligned with the left-wing
press. The questioning was truly atrocious and lacked any professional standards. [...] At
22 minutes into the show, I had enough. Why do I need to listen to someone who is
not practicing journalism? She is a political advocate.
NBC
News frames Senate sex tape video as 'conservative news outlets' pushing the story.
NBC News came under fire on social media over a "ridiculous" headline that seemed to fault
"conservative news outlets" for reporting that a Democrat Senate staffer filmed a gay sex video in
a Capitol Hill hearing room. The report came after the Daily Caller published an amateur
pornographic video Friday that showed an alleged congressional staffer engaging in sex with another
man in Hart Senate Office Building room 216. According to the Daily Caller, the video was
leaked after being "shared in a private group for gay men in politics." Posts on social media
claimed the alleged staffer worked for Sen. Ben Cardin, D-Md. Hours after the story
broke, Cardin's office announced that a legislative aide had been dismissed but did not explicitly
link the staffer or his dismissal to the sex tape.
NBC
Argues We Celebrate Economy 'Going in the Right Direction'. NBC's Today had an update
Wednesday on inflation following Tuesday's release of last month's inflation numbers with prices
rising 3.2 percent, but NBC liberals wanted us to "bask in the good news for a minute" with
prices falling in all sorts of sectors before conceding "grocery prices are too high" and the
public "doesn't feel" the way they're supposed to (as in positively) about the country's economic
outlook. "With the holiday season upon us, a lot of Americans are thinking about their
money. How far will their money go? Well, the latest report from the Bureau of Labor
Statistics showing that, overall, prices have not changed much the last few months, but they're
still up more than three percent from last year," co-host Craig Melvin began before boasting
"consumer prices are increasing at a slower rate than we've been seeing."
Here's
a top candidate for 'most misleading MSM headline of the year'. Paul Kessler, a
Jewish man in California, passed away after a pro-Palestine protester struck him in the head with a
megaphone. His death has been ruled a homicide. The Ventura County Sheriff's Office is
investigating and hasn't ruled out deeming the assault a hate crime. (I should hope not.
It obviously was.) In the latest example that the mainstream media are the enemy of the people
(and truth, sanity, and decency), NBC News ran the following online headline about the attack:
"Man dies after hitting head during Israel and Palestinian rallies in California, officials say."
Officials said that, you say? Hmm, did the poor fellow perhaps slip and fall, hitting his head on
the sidewalk? Did he smack himself in the head too hard? That headline makes it
difficult to discern what happened. Oh, he was murdered?! That's horrible! Why
didn't you say so?!
NBC
Quietly Changes "Man Dies After Hitting Head" Headline on Death of Elderly Jewish Man by
Pro-Palestine Protestor. On Monday, an elderly Jewish man, 65-year-old Paul Kessler,
succumbed to injuries sustained at a pro-Palestinian protest over the weekend after he was hit in
the head by a pro-Palestinian protester. Despite the extensive media reports about the deadly
incident, NBC News' headline is classic Mainstream Media gaslighting. The original headline
read, "Man dies after hitting head during Israel and Palestinian rallies in California, officials
say." Keller did not just "hit his head." He was attacked by a pro-Palestine protestor and
assaulted with a megaphone. The vicious blow caused Keller to fall to the ground where
suffered an additional blow to the head, compounding his injuries.
Look
at how NBC framed this story, then let me tell you the details. This NBC story is
getting traction, and NBC knew it would get traction, because they want to milk the "cops are bad,
America is racist" hustle for all it's worth. [Tweet] [...] This is why I hate the corporate
media. They are lying to you with glossy, embellished stories. This was indeed a
tragedy. There was no mention of Dexter's father in this entire piece (though I'm not
supposed to notice that). Dexter was a violent man who showed baseline common decency at times and
suffered the mental effects of a fatherless, criminal, addicted life. He needed better men to
guide him. But as a nearly-40-year-old man, he wasn't a boy. He stole cars and used
forcefully robbed people. This was his own fault and not the fault of "oppression" or "trauma."
NBC's
Moderator Told Trump 'No One' Is Calling For Late-Term Abortions. Here's Why She's
Wrong. NBC's Kristen Welker claimed "no one" is arguing for legal abortion up to
birth in her new interview with former President Donald Trump, but that claim is demonstrably
false. The new "Meet the Press" moderator sparred with Trump for over an hour on abortion and
other issues in an interview released Sunday. "The radical people on this are really the
Democrats that say after five months, six months, seven months, eight months, nine months, and even
after birth, you're allowed to terminate the baby," Trump told Welker during the interview.
"Mr. President, Democrats aren't saying that," Welker responded. Moments later Trump
said, "I said with Hillary Clinton when we had the debate, I made a statement, 'rip the baby out of
the womb' in the ninth month. You're allowed to do that, and you shouldn't be allowed to do
that." "Again, no one is arguing for that. That's not a part of anyone's platform,
Mr. President," Welker said. Besides the untold number of abortion activists who
advocate for abortion on demand up to birth, a slew of states currently allow abortion at any point
in the pregnancy. Alaska, Colorado, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington,
D.C. all allow abortion with no gestational limits.
Chuck
Todd signs off final show as host of 'Meet the Press'. Far-left MSNBC host Chuck Todd
celebrated his last day as the host of "Meet the Press" this Sunday morning by touting his
so-called "journalism." [...] To be clear, what Todd does is not journalism — it's
left-wing advocacy and commentary. [...] He's an advocate for the Democrat Party who spouts
Democrat Party talking points to a T and almost always dismisses Republican Party talking points as
misinformation, disinformation, etc. For example, in January he defended current President
Joe Biden's scandalous youngest son, Hunter, saying that "it is not a crime to make money off of
your last name." But it certainly is a crime when that last name is linked to the
presidency. Months later in May, he claimed gender isn't binary as is instead on a
spectrum — which, incidentally, is exactly the nonsense that Democrats believe.
Then in July, he touted a dubious study that claimed more Republicans than Democrats died during
the COVID pandemic — and he did so without pushing back on the study's suspicious
methodology. And then after the recent racially motivated mass shooting in Jacksonville the
following month, he echoed Democrat Party talking points about how racially motivated crimes are
mainly a Republican phenomenon.
Notice
what is missing from this article seeking to scare us? This article from NBC News
clearly is intended to scare us: ["]Ready for another 'tripledemic'? CDC prepares for
a winter of '3 bugs out there'["] But numbers and facts, are missing. They don't
tell us how many people are testing positive or how many hospitalizations there are. [...]
Nationwide it is less than 20,000. Why don't they put the numbers in the article? Probably
because 20,000 weekly visits in a population of 330 million wouldn't scare anyone. It also
doesn't say if the people were sick with other stuff or if they were admitted. It appears
that the reason for the article is to get us to take booster shots!
Preparing
America for the unthinkable. Recently, I was watching Meet the Press with
Chuck Todd. [...] As a teaser just before the Data Download on this particular show, Chuck Todd
said, "It is not uncommon for former leaders to be jailed or prosecuted after leaving office." He
went on to use banana republics like Guatemala and Panama as his first examples. [...] Although
no American President has ever been jailed after leaving office, Chuck Todd's point was clear: It's
not so bad that former President Trump, who has been charged with 37 felonies by Joe Biden, will go to
jail for possibly 400 years. It happens all the time. No big deal. Get over it America.
NBC
just repeats climate predictions by the UN, no matter how many previous dire projections have been
100% wrong. It seems that every day the media will repeat a doomsday prediction about
the climate from the UN or elsewhere to scare the public. They never ask questions even
though previous dire predictions have been 100% wrong. The purpose is clearly to mislead the
public that predictions are equivalent to facts, and they must capitulate to radical leftist
policies to save the planet. The prediction below is that people in the southern U.S won't be
able to survive unless they give up gas cars, gas furnaces, and other conveniences. [...] What will
make the South more uninhabitable is if they succed in destroying the power grid and we have less
air conditioning.
Fauci Family
Values. Dr. Anthony Fauci, formerly Joe Biden's top medical advisor, has
accepted a position as a distinguished professor at Georgetown University Medical School. As
NBC news explains, Dr. Fauci has "several personal connections" to the campus.
Dr. Fauci's wife Christine Grady earned her undergraduate and PhD degrees at Georgetown.
Fauci and Grady were married in Georgetown's Dahlgren Chapel, and their three daughters were born
at Georgetown Hospital. The NBC report fails to note that Grady is the head of bioethics at
the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and that her personal connections with Dr. Fauci are
far more extensive.
Community
Notes Gets Another One After Teacher Shares Pornographic LGBT Book and NBC News Lies About
It. In the apparent never-ending quest for some teachers and the mainstream press to
normalize grooming, a recent controversy arose in how NBC News decided to report a teacher who
showed pornographic materials to her students. According to the liberal broadcast network, a
police report was filed against Sarah Bonner, a teacher in Illinois, after she shared a book called
This Book Is Gay in a so-called classroom "book tasting." When a student brought that
book home and their parents found out, they decided to escalate the situation. Here's how NBC
News reported the incident. [...]
NBC
News retracts report about 16-year-old migrant working at a slaughterhouse (he was 21).
Earlier this month NBC News had a follow up report about teen migrants working as clearner [sic] in a
slaughterhouse run by a company called Packers Sanitation Services Inc. [...] It's both dangerous and
illegal for a 16-year-old to be doing this job. And yet, when the company asked NBC News to
identify "Pedro" so they could fire him, they refused. [...] So is it a good thing or a bad thing that
Pedro has this job? NBC seems to be on both sides of this at once. If it's okay for Pedro
to lie and hold down this dangerous job, is it okay for other underage teens to do the same?
Fortunately, the conundrum of protecting the underage slaughterhouse worker from being fired was solved
by the company who managed to identify Pedro and discovered he's actually 21-years-old. NBC has
since retracted its original story and replaced it with a new one.
NBC
News retracts spurious report on underage slaughterhouse workers. Recently, NBC News
and Noticias Telemundo published a series of reports on minors working for Packers Sanitation
Services Inc. (PSSI) cleaning slaughterhouses in the Midwest, as well as a piece about workers
using stolen identities to obtain jobs at PSSI. In the U.S., it's illegal for minors to work
in certain dangerous jobs, and this includes slaughterhouses. [...] Perhaps in this case PSSI can
sue the NBC news the way Dominion sued Fox News? As consumers, you have no choice but to
presume that all that you see in the news media is false until proven true.
George
Floyd riots rewritten as "2020 fires". Remember the George Floyd riots of 2020? I
do. Vast swathes of my city were burned down including a police precinct — a
first. The City of Minneapolis actually evacuated and abandoned a police precinct and let
rioters burn it down. It was pretty traumatic for the city. It took days to get the
city back under control. The National Guard had to be called out, and even then it took days
to retake the city. I lent my neighbor a gun. As a Black man, he was surprised I would
and very grateful. We were in it together, protecting each other against a mob. He
bought a gun soon after. First time ever for him. Well my local NBC station has figured
out how to describe the destruction during those times. And it isn't riot. In fact,
nobody did anything at all. What happened was an event that had nothing to do with human
agency: it was "the fires." They just sort of happened.
NBC
Rediscovers Hunter's 'Much Talked About' Laptop. On Thursday morning [2/2/2023], NBC's Today
rediscovered Hunter Biden's "much talked about laptop" (which in and of itself is comical for a liberal outlet to
assert) in order to trumpet Hunter's "aggressive new legal strategy" to force his father's Justice Department and allies
in Delaware law enforcement to open criminal investigations of those that shared and promoted its contents, which
resulted in "a series of salacious and frankly damaging media stories". The one minute and 45 seconds of
coverage were tacked onto a segment that began with the latest in President Joe Biden's documents scandal. [...] "Much
talked about laptop"? According to a Nexis search, NBC's Today and evening counterpart NBC Nightly
News only covered Hunter Biden's life of corruption 16 times in 2022 (eight times on Today, seven on
NBC Nightly News) with only six of those hits mentioning the laptop. This was despite the fact that NBC
itself confirmed it was real on May 18 (after The New York Times did so on March 16 and The
Washington Post followed on March 30).
'Reporter'
Ben Collins Suspended by NBC News for Criticism of Elon Musk. One of the worst "reporters" in existence
has been suspended by NBC News for their criticism of Elon Musk. Ben Collins, a self-proclaimed "disinformation"
expert who often appears on MSNBC as a talking head, was placed on an involuntary leave of absence after comments he
made about Musk that NBC News found inappropriate.
Judge
Rules Trump Ally Devin Nunes Can Sue NBC Universal for Defamation. A federal judge ruled on Monday that
Devin Nunes, an ally of former President Donald Trump and former California congressman, can sue NBC Universal for
defamation. Devin Nunes filed a defamation lawsuit against NBC Universal in 2021 over a comment made by MSNBC
anchor Rachel Maddow about his alleged relationship with a Russian agent. [...] The 22-page decision issued by U.S.
District Judge Kevin Castel argued that Maddow failed to cite any source for her claim against Nunes. Though the
judge acknowledged she might have possibly known about a similar accusation in a Politico article, he ultimately ruled
that "a court does not weigh competing, plausible theories of actual malice on a motion to dismiss."
NBC's
Mystery of the Week: Where in the world is Miguel Almaguer after Pelosi-report retraction? NBC News'
Miguel Almaguer was last seen on the Today show nearly a month ago, giving an update on the Paul Pelosi assault
story. At the time, Almaguer's sources within San Francisco law enforcement told him that body-cam records showed
Pelosi opening the door when police arrived, and then walking back toward his assailant: [Video clip]
NBC News later retracted the story, but didn't explain what Almaguer got wrong. Almost two weeks later, the local
NBC affiliate confirmed Almaguer's initial reporting: [...] The feds don't want to correct the record in their
indictment for a reason. They don't want to have to raise that question in court, or in the court of public
opinion either. Why? We certainly can speculate on that point. Apparently, NBC News felt the same way
after Almaguer's report. They retracted it within hours, even though it turned out to be entirely accurate, and
Almaguer hasn't been seen on air since. [...] One has to wonder whether NBC News is stuck in a position where they have
to keep Almaguer sidelined indefinitely. They clearly don't want to explain themselves or their actions. NBC
suspended him for reporting what turned out to be true, but which NBC mysteriously claimed didn't meet their
"standards." Presumably, truth isn't a standard at NBC News.
NBC's
"disinformation" reporter lives up to his title. NBC News has a reporter on the "disinformation" beat, and
he is really really good at his job. Every time he puts pen to paper, hands to keyboard, or eyes to camera he
spews out a steady stream of disinformation, misinformation, and dystopian fantasy. He describes himself as on the
"dystopia beat," so I guess that makes sense. He creates a dystopia and reports on his fantasy world. After
the horrific mass shooting at the Colorado Springs gay club Collins helped lead the charge in hanging the responsibility
for the shooting on anyone and everyone who opposes transgender ideology.
NBC
News Walks Back Report There Was Third Person Inside House During Attack on Paul Pelosi. NBC News walked
back a report Sunday that there was a third person in Paul Pelosi's home during the attack. "The SFPD also says that
there were only TWO people inside the Pelosi home (Paul Pelosi and DePape) when they responded, clarifying statements
made at Friday's press conference which seemed to indicate there was a third person inside the home who opened the
door," wrote NBC investigative correspondent Tom Winter on social media on Sunday afternoon. [...] Winter reported
Sunday morning on Meet the Press that there was a third person inside the home, who opened the door for police.
How to
detect a [bad] poll. I frequently comment on podcasts and elsewhere about some of the methodological
problems with current opinion polling, but rather than get into the arcana of sampling difficulties, statistical
weighting, question design, etc., let me suggest a simpler method of instantly detecting a [bad] poll: see if it's
from NBC News. The latest NBC News poll just out finds that 45 percent of voters approve of Joe Biden's
performance in office, while 47% of registered voters say they prefer Democrats to control Congress, while 46% want a
Republican-controlled Congress. The numbers tilt a bit closer to other polls showing much wider Republican margins
when the domain moves from registered voters to likely voters, though the general conditions this
year — and some of the "mood" numbers in this poll — make it hard to qualify "likely"
voters. But the real clue that this is a [bad] poll is the issue that the poll reports is the first choice for
most important for midterm voters: "Threats to democracy" (at 20 percent, just ahead of inflation at only
18 percent). There are virtually no actual voters who volunteer this answer.
NBC
Pushes Midterm Media Poll. NBC's Mark Murray produces a midterm media poll to frame the 2022 election and
claim a tight race for both Democrats and Republicans. Despite collapsing economic numbers, widespread inflation
and disapproval on every category, NBC finds the #1 issue for all voters is "The Threat to Democracy."
[Video clip] 71% of the country say we are on the wrong track (20% approve). 57% of the country
disapproves of the job Biden is doing with the economy (38% approve). 50% of the country says things will get
worse (20% think will improve). But it's a close election? And the #1 concern is "the threat to democracy?"
NBC's
Chuck Todd Laughably Insists More Illegal Aliens Will Solve Inflation. [Scroll down] Abbott and
DeSantis have two primary goals, both of which have worked, masterfully. First, to demonstrate to Democrat city
leaders the serious problem created as the influx of illegals continues to decimate border towns. Second, and most
brilliantly, to illustrate the left's complete hypocrisy when illegals show up on their doorstep. Such was
the case when residents of the upscale liberal enclave of Martha's Vineyard became apoplectic when just 50 illegals
showed up on their island, prompting them to ship out the illegals within less than 48 hours. Sorry,
Chuck — try harder, next time.
Who are
the Good Guys? Once you start living outside the bubble of the media elites telling
you what to think and believe, you find out there are different truths than reported. Back in
1979, a powerful earthquake hit Managua, Nicaragua while I was there. When I got stateside, I
watched an NBC story that featured a school that was badly damaged. The on-air personality
said that this was the scene of a deadly shootout between government forces and communist
guerrillas. Except, I knew that the school had been damaged in the earthquake and not in a
government assault. I reached out to NBC in New York and was astonished at their lack of
interest. And so, I learned that the national media cannot be trusted. Why is this
important? The world is moved by the actions of the few, not the many.
The
media myth of Democratic momentum. Many in the media really, really want you to
believe that the Democratic agenda led by President Biden is capturing the hearts and minds of
voters. That what was supposed to be a red wave is now becoming a ripple, with the Blue Team
instead poised to make gains in November. It's all wishful thinking, if recent
polls — particularly one from NBC News on Sunday — are any indication.
Because any objective person who understands political history knows it's hard to envision how a
president who is polling lower than any first-termer in polling history (from Truman to Trump) can
possibly galvanize voters to pull the lever for his party.
Chuck
Todd Pretends Not to Know Things. In a segment intended to protect the Biden regime from the outcome of their
energy policies, the latest distraction is to claim gas prices are not high when "adjusted" to account for the inflation that
Joe Biden has created. Due to the scale of impact from Biden energy policy there is no real way to obfuscate at a level
that hides reality. However, Chuck Todd from NBC gives it a try. Comrades, if you can fill up your car with 2010
gas prices, paid for with 2010 wages[,] Then surely you can fill up your pantry with 2010 food prices[,] while living in
your house with 2010 mortgage or rent prices... or something. [Video clip]
NBC
Reporter Claims Unborn Babies are "Pregnancies That Will Turn Into Children". One of the more insufferable
liberal hacks out there, NBC correspondent Yamiche Alcindor grotesquely minimized life on Tuesday in the wake of Monday's
leaked draft Supreme Court opinion overturning Roe v. Wade, lamenting "women of color... will be forced to
have pregnancies that they cannot afford... the will then turn into children" and commiserated with women who believe the end
of Roe is "like someone has died."
NBC
Sends Letter To Readers Admitting Reporter Plagiarized Stories. NBC News issued a letter to its readers Monday
admitting that a reporter plagiarized several stories over the past year. The outlet told readers that 11 stories by
the unnamed reporter contained passages from other news organizations without attribution and did "not represent original
reporting." The network's editorial team placed an editor's note on each of the plagiarized articles and removed the copy and
pasted passages. "A review by NBC News has found 11 articles written by a reporter over the last year that did not meet
our standards for original material," the note said. "The articles contained passages from other news organizations
that were used without attribution. In all cases, the passages were not central to the stories, but instead contained
supplemental or background material that did not represent original reporting."
\What
NBC Did to Make Lia Thomas Look More Feminine. Photojournalist and University of Pennsylvania graduate Erica
Denhoff said in an interview this week that a widely-circulated photo she took of biological male swimmer William "Lia"
Thomas, who competes on the women's swim team at the UPenn, was altered significantly in a recent news segment to "soften"
Thomas' features. In an interview with the Washington Examiner, Denhoff, who graduated from UPenn in 2008, said that an
image she took of Thomas was used on an NBC "Today" segment last week. She said she thought "something was honestly
wrong with the video" when her image of Thomas appeared on the screen. "To me, it definitely seems like something was
going on with the airbrushing/noise reduction of all of Lia's photos in this segment," Denhoff said. "When I first
noticed the airbrushing on the segment referenced, I thought something was honestly wrong with the video. But then, I
watched it again and thought, 'Wait a minute, this appears to be intentional. Lia's features are softened,'" the
photojournalist told the Examiner. "I then went to my original photo, on the sites that they could access to license
the photo, and compared it and immediately saw a difference."
NBC
Reporter Insists Biden Canceling Keystone Pipeline Made No Difference On US Dependence On Foreign Oil. NBC's
Chief White House correspondent Peter Alexander repeated White House talking points to his Republican guest during a MSNBC
interview on Thursday. Alexander denied that the Keystone XL Pipeline would've had any impact on the United States'
dependence on foreign oil. Alexander was speaking with former chief of staff for former Vice President Mike Pence, Marc
Short, when he started arguing with him over solutions to the U.S.' dependence on foreign energy, amid the Ukraine-Russia
war. He asked Short if President Biden should put embargoes on Russian oil and gas exports, and Short said yes and
blamed the Biden administration for making the U.S. more reliant on foreign energy by shutting down the Keystone Pipeline.
Chuck
Todd Panel Goes Comedy Gold After Andrea Mitchell Proclaims Journalists 'Are Not Democrats'. We've written
often at this site about Chuck Todd and about his colleague Andrea Mitchell a time or two as well, and it never fails to
amaze me how both of them continue to believe that as long as they keep saying journalists aren't liberally biased people
will believe them. In this writer's view, the receipts are pretty substantial if not overwhelming that journalists do
indeed harbor a left-wing bias. For starters, pretty much every poll that has been taken over the last decade on media
contributions to politicians shows that the vast majority of journalists contribute either to Democrats or Democrat
causes. That's an objective fact, and one that is often reflected in the way stories are "reported," as we've
documented [elsew]here extensively.
NBC
op-ed shamelessly smears pro-life movement by linking it to white nationalism. NBC News ran an op-ed by
abortion advocates who spuriously attempted to link the pro-life movement and the March for Life to white nationalism,
claiming they are willing to overlook racist agendas in order to form a united front against abortion. The piece ran on
Monday [1/24/2022] and was authored by pro-choice advocates Renee Bracey Sherman and Lizz Winstead who pointed to the Patriot
Front crashing the March for Life event last week as proof that the movement supports white supremacists. They called
it a "dog whistle ... coming from inside the house" and alleged that the incident proves pro-life advocates are "ignoring racism."
Democrats
are terrified that ordinary Americans are calling them out. On Sunday's [12/12/2021] Meet the Press,
Chuck Todd gathered around him John Heilemann, a leftist journalist; Marianna Sotomayor, a leftist journalist; Brendan Buck,
an ostensible Republican who worked for Paul Ryan and John Boehner; and Kimberly Atkins Stohr, a leftist journalist.
All five were unanimous: democracy in America is over because Americans don't believe that Biden honestly won his seat in the
White House. The hyperbole was thick in the air, along with more than a soupçon of hypocrisy and a huge dollop of fear.
NBC:
You're not qualified to participate in your children's education. Welcome to Bizarro World, otherwise known as
NBC "Think". In an essay NBC published last night from Christina Wyman, parents want to have children "indoctrinated"
while schools want to free their minds. Wyman decries parental resistance to progressive pedagogy, arguing that
parental involvement in education is as dangerous as it would be to have parents in the operating room.
Divorced
From the Truth; Wedded to the Lies They Have Been Told. At this writing, the verdict in the Kyle Rittenhouse
murder trial has not been rendered, so the defendant is still in serious legal jeopardy and the jury could find him guilty.
[...] As a casual observer of the trial's progress and witness testimony, I had taken notice that the prosecution was not
doing a stellar job. However, what truly grabbed my attention was that a star prosecution witness, Gaige Grosskreutz,
was forced to admit under oath that he did indeed advance toward and threaten Kyle Rittenhouse's life by pointing his
illegal handgun at him. Rittenhouse responded to the threat of bodily harm and shot Grosskreutz in the
bicep. Out of curiosity, I wanted to see how state-controlled media would respond to the devasting cross-examination
testimony, so I watched "NBC Nightly News." In predictable but nonetheless gobsmacking bias, Lester Holt dutifully
ignored Grosskruetz's testimony that he had pointed his handgun at Rittenhouse. Truth ignored, narrative
unscathed — unless one has learned not to trust anything the corrupt, partisan media are saying.
Tom
Cotton Goes Total Beast Mode on Terry McAuliffe After 'Tiki Torchers' Reportedly Exposed. We reported earlier
on the despicable smear attempt made during an event for Virginia Republican gubernatorial nominee Glenn Youngkin during a
rally in Charlottesville that took place this morning. To recap, a number of individuals were seen in a photo standing
in front of the Youngkin campaign's tour bus while carrying tiki torches, with some of the individuals wearing hats that
indicated supposed "support" for former President Donald Trump. To many, it was an obvious effort at invoking images of
the tiki torches being carried by white nationalists the night before the 2017 "Unite the Right" rally in Charlottesville,
which turned violent when James Alex Fields Jr drove a car into counter-protesters, in the process killing 32-year-old
Heather Heyer. Everything about the photo appeared staged and phony, and RedState cartoonist Jim Thompson's take on it
reflects that. But an oddly incurious local NBC News "reporter" nevertheless tweeted it out unquestioningly.
Andrea
Mitchell Falsely Claims GOP 'Booed' Powell at 2000 Convention. As news broke Monday morning [10/18/2021] of the
passing of former Secretary of State and Joint Chiefs Chairman Colin Powell, on NBC's Today show, correspondent Andrea
Mitchell jumped at the chance to exploit his death to bash Republicans. However, in her ghoulish rush to do so, she got
her facts wrong when she falsely claimed he was "booed" at the 2000 GOP National Convention. "I was on the floor of the
convention in 2000 in Philadelphia when Republicans booed him," Mitchell proclaimed while calling in to the morning show to
share her thoughts on Powell. She even went so far as to argue that moment began the late General's shift to the
Democratic Party years later: "But he has stood out from his Republican Party even back in 2000 at that convention for
speaking up for black rights and eventually did endorse Barack Obama, as you know."
Katie
Couric covered up RBG's dislike for taking the knee: Anchor says she edited 2016 interview to 'protect' the
justice. Katie Couric has admitted to 'protecting' Ruth Bader Ginsburg from public backlash by cutting out
negative comments she made about people who kneel during the national anthem. The former Today show host reveals in her
new book that she let her personal political views influence her editing decisions after her interview with the late Supreme
Court justice in 2016.
There
Are A Lot of Brandons. The beauty of "Let's Go, Brandon" is how it not only captures the utter contempt that
America has for our alleged president, who is currently polling about as well as Michael Moore would be among Golden Corral
managers, but how it captures what is either unbelievable cluelessness among the media, or unbelievable mendacity.
Probably some of both. NASCAR driver Brandon Brown [...] was being interviewed by NBC Sports reporter Kelli
Stavast. Now, NBC is [...] perhaps the most full of it of all networks even in a universe that, for some reason,
includes CNN. The crowd in the background begins a chant. It's a chant that is sweeping the nation, heard at
college football games, rallies, and wherever patriots are gathered. It's not "Let's go, Brandon." [...] Everyone hates
Joe Biden, and this spontaneous chant is a symptom of the disease infecting his poll numbers.
NASCAR
Crowd Chants 'F Joe Biden' As NBC Reporter Interviewed Winner Live On TV, Reporter Goes Into Gaslight Mode.
Chants of "F--- Joe Biden" rained down from the crowd at Alabama's Talladega Superspeedway after Brandon Brown captured his
first NASCAR Xfinity Series race victory. The anti-Biden chants came during Brown's post-race interview. After
Brown told a reporter his victory was a "dream come true," the crowd began to loudly shout in unison their displeasure with
the president. An NBC reporter acknowledged the chants but falsely claimed the fans were shouting "Let's go
Brandon!" [Video clip]
The
White Backlash That Wasn't. In a long story featuring analysis of demographic data, NBC News reporter Tyler
Kingkade and data editor Nigel Chiwaya claim that the parent uprisings against critical race theory, which have occurred in
more than 200 school districts across the country, are a "backlash" against "rapid demographic change" and "the exposure of
white students to students of color." Or, to put it bluntly, it's the ugly reaction of white racism in the face of rapidly
integrating schools. As left-leaning Slate concluded, NBC's reporting proves that fear of "white replacement" and the
desire to "protect whiteness" motivate the anti-critical race theory movement. There is only one problem: NBC's
analysis is nonsense. The report, like the left-wing narrative about critical race theory more generally, fails both
statistically and imaginatively.
Chuck
Todd: There is no liberal media bias. NBC's Chuck Todd gave a lengthy interview to the Verge in which he
was asked about media bias. Specifically, the discussion started with whether or not Todd would allow Sen. Ted
Cruz to appear on Meet the Press. Todd said he wasn't sure he would because Cruz isn't credible and may just be
there to gaslight viewers. That led to a broader points about objectivity and fairness. According to Todd, the
GOP has repeated claims of media bias to the point where even some liberals believe it.
NBC
Goes Full-Bore Crazy Smearing Opponents of CRT as 'QAnon'. The fight against Critical Race Theory in the
schools has had a lot of success. It's also opened the eyes of a lot of parents. That's making folks in the NEA
and their friends in the mainstream media upset that parents would dare question what is being taught to their
children. So, how to respond to the very successful effort from parents of all races and all political stripes?
Demonize them as conspiracy theorists and QAnon people. Now it's not just about Russia mania, they've incorporated
"QAnon" mania into their thought as well.
Lester
Holt: Poster Child for Media Bias. [NBC News anchor Lester Holt] views the world through his perspective,
assumes he has a correct representation of it in his mind, that anyone who disagrees with him is incorrect. It also
means he thinks every rational person shares his opinion. If they don't, he considers them benighted, biased, or wrong.
[...] Holt said the media's job is to "...help our audiences understand what our role is in a healthy democracy." What Holt
meant was that the media should be the definers of truth, should take its version of the truth and attempt to make it conventional
wisdom. Holt's comments represent a fundamental change in the MSM's perception of itself and its role in today's society.
It is not the MSM's job to take sides on any controversy because, in its view, the effort impedes judgment, biases its search for
the truth. The MSM's "problem" is that most of its journalists believe they are the only valid definers of truth.
This conceit leads them to assume that their truth is the truth. The media's job is not to determine or
define what the truth is.
NBC's
Chuck Todd Was Amy Klobuchar's Landlord, Didn't Disclose During Interviews and Coverage. In 2008, shortly after
becoming a U.S. senator, Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) and her husband, John Bessler, began renting a house in Arlington, Virginia,
from Chuck Todd, then NBC News' political director. [...] According to Page Six, which first reported the relationship,
Klobuchar and her husband paid the Todds $3,200 a month. This relationship went undisclosed for years, even though Todd
went on to question Klobuchar at least eight times on-air during her 2020 campaign, including as the moderator of two of the
primary debates.
NBC
Cherry Picks Facebook to Discredit Our Republic's Ultimate Defenders. I read a recent NBC story —
In secret Facebook groups, America's best warriors share racist jabs, lies about 2020, even QAnon
theories — in which the writer, Carol Lee, alleges radicalization, extremism, and significant racism among US
Special Operations Forces (SOF). Lee bases this over-the-top declaration because she gained access to four "secret" Facebook
groups. She also approached some DoD officials with questions about extremism, leading to some run-of-the-mill
responses. This is at best shoddy journalism and at worst a leftist hit piece on our most elite and dedicated military
professionals. To begin, these so-called "secret" groups are really "members only" groups that anyone can create on
Facebook. No group or page on Facebook is truly private, let alone secret. One can only assume Lee uses the word
"secret" to imply that something nefarious is going on and, by Lee's definition, my members-only neighborhood group page is
also secret and should invite media scrutiny.
Brit
Hume Gives Lester Holt a Journalism 101 Lesson After NBC News Anchor Claimed 'Fairness Is Overrated'. My
colleague Mike Miller reported Thursday [4/1/2021] on an eye-opening moment that happened earlier this week when NBC News
anchor Lester Holt accepted the Edward R. Murrow Lifetime Achievement Award during the 45th Murrow Symposium, which was
virtual this year due to the pandemic. As he gave his speech, Holt told Washington State University's College of
Communications that "fairness" in journalism "is overrated," proclaiming that some arguments were objectively true and that
their counterarguments did not deserve equal time.
NBC News Anchor:
'Fairness Is Overrated'. NBC Nightly News anchor Lester Holt says "fairness is overrated" and the news media no
longer needs to present both sides of a given story. Holt, who was this week awarded the Edward R. Murrow Lifetime
Achievement Award in Journalism from Washington State University, waxed poetic on the news media, at one point declaring that
"it's become clearer that fairness is over-rated." "Before you run off and tweet that headline, let me explain a bit,"
he said. "The idea that we should always give two sides equal weight and merit does not reflect the world we find
ourselves in. That the sun sets in the west is a fact. Any contrary view does not deserve our time or attention."
Holt said "you won't have to look far to find more current and relevant examples," noting misinformation about the 2020 presidential
election and COVID-19. And the anchor said there's no longer any need for a journalist to give both sides of a story equal weight.
The Editor says...
Chuck Todd made this statement as part of a "question" for Dr. Anthony Fauci, who then failed to take the bait,
and didn't mention climate change in his answer. Chuck Todd attempted to inject global warming into a
discussion where it has no place. That's fake news.
Smug
NBC, CNN bigshots report 'petty' Trump didn't offer Air Force plane to Biden. It was fake news.. NBC
News' Kelly O'Donnell and CNN's April Ryan both falsely reported that President Trump did not offer an Air Force plane to
President-elect Biden to arrive in D.C. for his inauguration. Biden instead, chose to charter a private plane with a
generic paint job. CNN's Jake Tapper, O'Donnell, and Ryan labeled Trump as childish and petty for not doing so, but it
was Biden who made that choice. O'Donnell tweeted: "Arriving on a private charter aircraft with a generic paint
job instead of the customary use of an Air Force plane for an incoming president is among the many courtesies not extended to
the new president by the departing one." The tweet is still posted and has not been deleted.
How
NBC News Helped the Biden Campaign Ruin an Innocent Man and Bury the Hunter Laptop Story. Hunter Biden was the
October Surprise that wasn't. A report so explosive, so potentially damaging, so dangerous for national security that
it should have destroyed Joe Biden's bid for the White House. In any other election, fleets of investigative reporters
would have been unleashed to verify the claims in the report. Instead, in the ultimate expression of Trump Derangement
Syndrome, a major media company set out to personally destroy the man who they thought put the report together and thereby
discredit the report to the point that the entire media complex in America took turns ridiculing the story instead of
investigating it. The results could have dire implications for national security.
As
Hunter Associate Steps Forward, NBC Still Claims Story 'Unverified'. NBC chief White House correspondent Hallie
Jackson was a grade-A fake news sprayer Thursday night [10/22/2020], just before the debate as NBC Nightly News was
the only evening newscast still desperately trying to defend Joe Biden for the Hunter Biden scandal laptop scandal. She
continued to push the long-debunked claim that the emails were "unverified" and just "a foreign disinformation campaign," the
same day a former Hunter business associate came forward with new texts and confirmed the story. Speaking on what to
expect at the final presidential debate later that night, Jackson scoffed at President Trump's strategy of bringing up the
Biden family's corruption: [Lengthy quote omitted for brevity, among other things] Jackson would later note that Trump
planned to "bring a former business associate of Hunter Biden's" as his guest to the debate, and political director Chuck
Todd griped about Trump's "special guest" later on. But none of them cared to tell their viewers more about him.
That's where Fox News Channel's Mike Emanuel and Special Report come in. [...]
QAnon:
The Media's Latest Obsession. Big media has had multiple obsessions during President Trump's first term.
From Stormy and Avenatti to the myriad tell-all books about Trump, his administration, and his family. From Russia and
an innocuous phone call to Ukraine, to his taxes and how many scoops of ice cream he is served. These are all red
herrings, a way to pick at Trump while studiously avoiding serious policy issues, what he is actually accomplishing as
president, promises made becoming promises kept. The latest obsession is QAnon, in the media and recently at the NBC
town hall event. Despite being billed as a question and answer session, it was more of a debate between President Trump
and NBC's partisan newsreader Savannah Guthrie. Of all the issues facing America in 2020 and of concern to voters,
QAnon is not on the list. Yet she laser focused on QAnon starting with[,] "Let me ask you about QAnon" to which Trump
responded, "I know nothing about QAnon." Rather than moving on to the economy or healthcare, she obsessively persisted,
insisting that Trump denounce "the fringe conspiracy theory."
Chuck
Todd: The Michigan Supreme Court Did Not "Cite Any Law" In Ruling Whitmer's Actions Unconstitutional.
Chuck Todd interviewed Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer this morning and turned to the recent decision of the Michigan
Supreme Court that ruled that she had violated the Michigan Constitution in her extended pandemic orders. Todd did not
challenge Whitmer stating falsely that the opinion was a "partisan" decision. It was not. The "Democrat justices"
agreed that Whitmer violated the Constitution. They only disagreed on the remedy. However, that untruth was
quickly lost in what was a flagrantly untrue statement by Todd himself. He told NBC viewers that the justices did not
cite any law to support their decision against Whitmer. Todd stated as fact that the Court did not "cite any Michigan
law, they didn't cite any law in deciding that you didn't have this power." The roughly 50 page opinion contains over
60 cases discussed in support of the decision. It does not seem to matter anymore at Meet The Press or NBC.
NBC is not alone.
NBC
town hall panned as 'Biden infomercial': 'Undecided voters' didn't seem so 'undecided'. NBC's town hall
featuring Joe Biden did not receive the warmest reception on Monday night [10/5/2020]. The outdoor, televised event,
which aired on both NBC and MSNBC, took place in the swing state of Florida and moderator Lester Holt told viewers that all
of the Miami attendees were "undecided voters." [...] Then the "undecided voters" were able to speak to the former vice
president one-on-one. Of the roughly eleven voters who were able to ask questions, one was described as "leaning"
towards Biden, one was described as a "registered Republican" that was also "leaning" towards Biden, one was described as a
former registered Republican who "voted for Hillary Clinton" and other one voted for Clinton in 2016 but he, too, according
to Holt, voted for Republicans "in the past." None of the attendees were described as a Trump voter or "leaning" towards
voting for the incumbent president. All of their questions were primarily focused on Biden's plans as president rather
than tough questions that challenged the candidate on his 47-year record.
Bought
Referee: Chuck Todd Argues Only Dems Have 'Met This Moment'. With the coronavirus relief benefits
expiring last Friday, and Democrats and Republicans still in negotiations over what the next round of aid would look like,
self-described political referee and NBC political director Chuck Todd showed what a bought off rules enforcer could do
during his routine appearance on NBC's Sunday Today. [...] It's worth noting that in addition to Todd's default
liberal bent, his pockets get lined with cash from left. As NewsBusters has previously reported, in 2016 he covered-up
how his wife's firm was getting millions from the Bernie Sanders campaign. Before that, she advised the Jim Webb
presidential campaign. And in early 2020, Page Six exposed how Todd had rented his Arlington, Virginia house to
Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN). And as he was concluding his Sunday appearance, Todd declared that President Trump had
"undermined" the outcome of the 2020 election by showing concerns about voting integrity; calling it "deeply dangerous for
the democracy." Yet, MSNBC was still claiming the only reason Trump was president was because of Russia.
MSNBC
Evening Shows Gave 137 Mins to Expert Who Said He Had Coronavirus (He Didn't). For almost two months in his
Fourth Watch newsletter, the indispensable Steve Krakauer has been chronicling the strange case of MSNBC/NBC medical and
science contributor Joseph Fair, who had claimed in May that he not only contracted the virus, but was hospitalized.
Even worse yet, he surmised he contracted it through his eyes on a flight. But as Krakauer's reporting showed, it was
all a lie as Fair "had at least five negative coronavirus tests" and tested negative for COVID-19 antibodies. MSNBC and
NBC predictably kept their heads in the sand despite this breach of journalistic ethics and peddling of bona fide fake news.
NBC
News Spent Weeks Reporting On A Contributor's Journey Battling Coronavirus — But He Never Had It.
NBC News spent weeks documenting its science contributor's battle with COVID-19, but now he admits that he never tested
positive for it. Dr. Joseph Fair, a virologist, believed he had the virus and appeared on air numerous times to
discuss his struggle with illness in May and June. On Tuesday, Fair admitted that he tested negative for the virus
multiple times but had originally believed he had it regardless. Fair also tested negative upon taking an antibody test.
It
Would Appear NBC Buried Some Key Details About Their Medical Expert's 'Coronavirus Battle'. For two weeks, not
really a lot of COVID coverage and when the rioting began to subside, we needed to get back inside. Yeah, not
happening. New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, one of the most insufferable clowns in office, issued an edict banning
large crowd gatherings unless you're protesting in support of Black Lives Matter. They don't even hide their hypocrisy
anymore. Well, over at NBC News, there was something they tried to hide as well regarding COVID, which is that one of
their contributors who they peddled as having the virus... never had it. Former CNN producer Steve Krakauer
touched upon this, noting that the network appeared to just ignore that Dr. Joseph Fair had five negative tests
regarding COVID. Oh, and it gets worse, Fair had scores of interviews because he was the man who "recovered" from the
virus. He never had it. Either this is willful deception or just an epic screw-up. If it's the former, then
welcome to the fake news hall of fame.
NBC
Guest Doctor Who Was Suffering from Coronavirus in Hospital in TV Interviews — Never Had
Coronavirus!. Dr. Joseph Fair appeared on NBC and the Today Show nearly a dozen times in May during the
height of the coronavirus pandemic in the United States. Dr. Fair appeared in a hospital bed fighting off the
disease with oxygen tubes in his nose when he appeared on NBC. In one segment Dr. Joseph Fair told the Today hosts,
"If it can take me down, it can take anybody."
NBC
Science Contributor Who Reported About Having Coronavirus Admits He Never Had It. NBC and MSNBC science
contributor Dr. Joseph Fair documented his battle with coronavirus — until admitting he did not actually have
it after all. The Daily Caller reported Friday: "Dr. Joseph Fair, a virologist, believed he had the virus
and appeared on air numerous times to discuss his struggle with illness in May and June. On Tuesday [7/7/2020], Fair admitted
that he tested negative for the virus multiple times but had originally believed he had it regardless. Fair also tested
negative upon taking an antibody test." Fair's timeline on Twitter documents his journey over the past two months, from
announcing that he had "come down with COVID" on May 13, to revealing on July 7 that he had not.
Let's 'Demonetize'
NBC News And Google. his week saw a depressing new low in the attempt by the left to silence voices with which
it disagrees when an NBC News "reporter" tried to enlist Google to block two conservative websites' ability to make
money. In a report on Tuesday [6/16/2020], NBC News' London-based Adele-Momoko Fraser claimed that Google had banned
The Federalist and Zero Hedge from its ad platform over articles that were "pushing unsubstantiated claims about the Black
Lives Matter protests." Google soon tried to correct the record, saying that "The Federalist was never demonetized." Google
had only threatened to blacklist the site from its ad network. (It did "demonetize" Zero Hedge.) What's more,
contrary to NBC News, Google's actions against The Federalist and Zero Hedge had nothing to do with articles they published,
but with reader comments on those sites.
NBC
Appoints Itself Internet-Speech Arbiter. Wow. I guess every day at the "NBC News Verification Unit" is a
game of "Two Truths and a Lie." Yesterday [6/16/2020] NBC News, the employer of Brian Williams and former employer of Matt
Lauer, Mark Halperin, and Chris Matthews, revealed that it has an obscure self-described "verification unit" that appointed
itself to police American political discourse, and initially reported that Zero Hedge and the Federalist had been banned from
generating revenue through widely used Google Ads, deeming their content to be racist. The report characterized those
sites as "far-right," even though the Federalist publishes a variety of right-of-center viewpoints and Zero Hedge is an
idiosyncratic libertarian-leaning financial and market news site.
NBC
News' Attempt to Demonetize the Federalist Is Illiberal Insanity. NBC News reported today that two sites,
ZeroHedge and the Federalist, had been banned from generating revenue through widely used Google Ads. A
Google spokesperson initially told NBC News that it "took action after determining the websites violated its policies on
content related to race." I don't know much about ZeroHedge, but the contention that the Federalist (where
I worked as a senior editor from 2013 to 2019) is "far-right," as reporter Adele-Momoko Fraser claims twice in her piece, is
utter nonsense. The Federalist publishes a wide variety of opinions. Some pieces are more provocative than
others. Some are very provocative. So what? NBC News is trying to make the site sound like the Daily
Stormer, when in fact it has contributions from well-known mainstream libertarians, social conservatives, and moderate
Republicans. All of the content falls well within normal parameters of contemporary political discourse —
which is exactly what outlets such as NBC News are trying to shut down.
Did
NBC and Google engage in antitrust collusion against two conservative sites? Leftists cannot allow ideological
competition. If their ideas have to go head-to-head with conservative ideology, their ideas lose. Leftists and
other fascists win only by shouting more loudly and breaking things more aggressively than do people committed to individual
rights. Sometimes, though, if you're arrogantly confident that you have the upper hand, you get careless. That's
what happened with NBC and Google when they colluded to demonetize The Federalist and Zero Hedge. It's no
coincidence that the Department of Justice almost immediately afterward announced that it was going to end the immunity that
protected internet platforms from antitrust actions if they try to stifle competition — something that may save
American Thinker from a demonetizing attack. There's a lot to unpack here. First, under §230 of the
Communications Decency Act of 1996, the big platforms were made immune from liability for third-party content on the ground
that they were functioning as bulletin boards, not publishers. They're still protected even though they're now making
judgments about the content (usually in ways that hurt conservatives). They're also immune from antitrust actions if they
work with other parties' to silence the latters' competition.
NBC
Tries and Fails to Wreck a Conservative Website. Here's Why It's Deeply Problematic. If you value a
robust media offering a variety of voices, you should be troubled by a chilling incident that occurred this week.
Citing the work of two foreign-based activist groups, NBC News reported Tuesday that Google would demonetize a conservative
news and opinion outlet, The Federalist — meaning not allow it to carry Google Ads on its site. Why?
Because of The Federalist's coverage of the George Floyd protests. Later that day, Google clarified that its specific
issue was the comments section below articles on The Federalist, not the articles themselves. When The Federalist
removed its comments section, Google said it considered the issue resolved. This episode shows how a media outlet such
as NBC News apparently is willing to collude with radicals alongside one of the world's most powerful tech companies to ruin
the competition.
Chuck
Todd Parrots Idea That the Nation 'Will Not Survive' Trump Reelection. In the past, Chuck Todd has railed
against hyperbole, misinformation and GOP "alternative facts." But on Sunday, he seemed quite enamored with the apocalyptic
sentiment that America "will not survive" a Donald Trump reelection. NAACP president and CEO Derrick Johnson appeared
on the YouTube-only portion of Meet the Press. He warned, "This nation, not only African-American community, we will
not survive if there is a continuation of this administration." Rather than commit the act of journalism and challenge his
guest Todd marveled, "Strong words, President Johnson. Those are very strong words. 'We will not survive if there's
another term.'"
NBC reporter downplays DC church
fire as 'some vandalism'. NBC reporter Tom Costello called a church fire in D.C. "some vandalism" when he was
on-air discussing D.C. protests. "Yeah, it's dead quiet at the moment," Costello said, "Let me just give you the lay of
the land. Across the street here is St. John's Church." He added, "As you know, that's the church that had some
vandalism and President Trump stood in front of with the Bible a few nights ago." Costello made the erroneous comment on
MSNBC's "Live with Stephanie Ruhle," and Ruhle did not correct Costello either.
NBC
News Publishes Op-Ed Saying Our American Flag Means Nothing. NBC News published an op-ed blasting NFL star Drew
Brees for criticizing football players who kneel during the national anthem. The op-ed by Noah Berlatsky goes so far as
to say that Brees' "biggest mistake" in defending the American flag was "believing" that it "means anything." Brees has been
hit with an unprecedented amount of backlash this week after simply saying that he does not agree with kneeling during the
national anthem. The New Orleans Saints quarterback said that he views the move as a sign of "disrespect" and shared
the story of his military roots.
Meet
the Press. Meet Chuck Todd, the poster boy for biased, unprincipled, activist journalism. Todd is a
perfect example of the modern press. Mr. Todd's qualifications as a journalist and "political expert" are based
neither on achievement nor academic accomplishment. He possesses neither a journalism nor political science
degree. What he does possess is the only qualification modern "journalists" must hold, a rabid liberal-progressive
point of view.
How can NBC not
suspend Chuck Todd? The power of selective video editing is real and profound. Whether simple maneuvers
like eliminating the inclusion of surrounding context, or more complex manipulations involving cutting, splicing, and
merging, the ability of media to create a false narrative or misrepresent reality has never been so formidable.
Lame:
Chuck Todd Offers Mealy-Mouthed Apology for Deceptive Edit, Blames... CBS? Behold, the epitome of
laziness. On Tuesday's [5/12/2020] MTP Daily, NBC News political director Chuck Todd offered a muddled and
pathetic apology/non-apology for the deceptive edit Sunday's Meet the Press carried out against Attorney General Bill
Barr, saying that he was "very sorry for that mistake" but blamed CBS News clips for this kerfuffle. Only in the final
seconds of the 65-second bit did Todd offer the magic words: "I obviously am very sorry for that mistake. We
strive to do better going forward." Translation? Todd admitted that he and his staff weren't engaging in basic
journalism or research.
Chuck
Todd grievously misquoted Bill Barr on Meet the Press. On Sunday's [5/10/2020] Meet the Press, host
Chuck Todd included a very short clip of a statement Attorney General Bill Barr made during an interview with Catherine
Herridge. In its abbreviated form, the quotation made it sound as if Barr intended to use the Big Brother technique of
controlling history by consigning to the waste bin anything countering the official narrative. In reality, Barr said
quite the opposite, standing up for justice and the rule of law.
NBC admits Chuck
Todd's 'Meet the Press' deceptively edited Barr remarks on Flynn. NBC News' Chuck Todd aired a deceptively
edited clip of Attorney General Bill Barr discussing the Michael Flynn case during his "Meet the Press" broadcast on Sunday,
prompting the network to concede the mistake hours later — but there is still no word on whether Todd will
apologize on-air. Asked by CBS News' Catherine Herridge how history would judge the DOJ's decision to move to dismiss
the Flynn case, Barr initially responded, laughing: "Well, history is written by the winners, so it largely depends on
who's writing the history."
NBC
News Analyst Claims U.S. Lock-Down Protests Created by Russians. Oddly enough I thought about this yesterday
when Washington State Governor Jay Inslee was complaining about citizen protests being a form of "domestic rebellion." The
modern liberal mindset cannot fathom how removing liberty and freedom, from a nation founded upon freedom and liberty, would
start to ignite protests. They need to blame something. In the Democrat collective worldview big government
control of their lives is a utopia to be achieved. Therefore those same Chè T-shirt wearing ideologues cannot
understand push-back based on individualism. A justification for visible frustration is needed. What could
possibly be causing this anger? Why yes, the Russians of course. Gottabe.
Don't
Get Distracted: Democrats Still Have Eyes on the Prize. Our major, legacy media press corps criticizes
President Trump for not being clairvoyant regarding COVID-19. [...] DMIC [Democrat Media Industrial Complex] "journalists,"
such as NBC's Peter Alexander, aren't interested in news; they're interested in being the stories themselves. DMIC
coverage isn't about information; it's about narratives, and it's about propagating rote narratives over and over and over
and over.
NBC's
Chuck Todd Pretends The Left Isn't Politicizing Coronavirus. Either NBC's Chuck Todd isn't very bright, or he
thinks his audience isn't very bright. On his Sunday broadcast, the journalist interview Vice President Mike Pence on
his recent comments condemning people on the left for using "irresponsible rhetoric" when discussing the coronavirus
issue. The host then played a series of clips from conservative pundits lambasting progressives for politicizing the
spread of the coronavirus. One of these commentators was Rush Limbaugh, who excoriated Democrats for having
"weaponized" the virus. Donald Trump Jr. argued that the president's opponents were attempting to "take a pandemic and
seemingly hope that it comes here and kills millions of people so that they could end Donald Trump's streak of winning."
Todd then attempted to put the vice president on the spot, intimating that Democrats are not engaging in this behavior.
"None of this seems to match the facts. What facts are there that Democrats are doing this? ... Seems like people are
asking questions, and they're concerned about the virus. This, this implies some sort of political motivation, which is
kind of gross," he claimed.
After
FISA Abuse, Chuck Todd Thinks DOJ's Problem Is Too Much Accountability. So much of the drama of the last three
years of the Trump administration is about the conflict between the Constitution, which requires political oversight of the
bureaucracy, and the Resistance's strongly held view that political oversight of the administrative state is evil. The
Russia collusion hoax was perpetrated by bureaucrats who admitted they were motivated by a a belief that their foreign policy
vision was more appropriate and legitimate than the one chosen by the American people when they elected Donald Trump to be
their president.
The
Mass Media's Campaign of Moral Panic. In early October, Chuck Todd stared stone-faced into MSNBC's living rooms
and intoned gravely, "I don't say this lightly, but let's be frank — a national nightmare is upon us. The
basic rules of our democracy are under attack from the president[.] ... [T]hat all but ensures his impeachment in the House
of Representatives. ... This moment should arguably be a national emergency. The Founding Fathers would have considered
it a national emergency — if the president publicly lobbied multiple governments to interfere in the next
election. It's tough to say lightly, but this is the moment we're at." Said lightly or not, coming a week after
House speaker Nancy Pelosi's announcement of an impeachment inquiry, Charles David "Chuck" Todd — the 12th
incarnation of Meet the Press moderators and NBC News's political director, responsible for all aspects of NBC's political
coverage — was initiating a "moral panic." Using his platform as the voice of "the longest-running program on
network television," and arguably mass media's highest-profile soldier in the Trump resistance, Todd's intention was
deliberate and unmistakable: to instill public fear. It had moral panic written all over it — perfect for
an impeachment.
NBC
News Goes Full Fascist: Voting for 'Racist' Trump Is 'Not Only Immoral but Illegal'. This is what will
happen if the fascist radical left takes over: they will literally attempt to outlaw voting for a candidate they don't
approve of. A week ago, NBC News published an opinion piece that has been largely ignored by conservatives and
libertarians. That is a mistake because author Noah Berlatsky carefully explains to us what he and his fellow
extremists think of democracy itself: they hate it and despise it. Berlatsky's opening salvo is aimed at Donald Trump's
2016 campaign which he deems "openly racist."
The Religious
Bigotry of NeverTrumpers. The mockumentary that aired Sunday on NBC's "Meet the Press" featured many
sidesplitting moments; host Chuck Todd and other Democratic activists disguised as journalists spent an hour solemnly
discussing the "assault on the truth" inflicted by Donald Trump and his "cult-like" followers. The very same
propagandists responsible for spreading fake news and conspiracy theories about collusion between Team Trump and the Russians
proceeded to scold the president, his advisors, and conservatives for allegedly spreading fake news and conspiracy
theories. It was hilarious. The executive editor of the Washington Post, the news organization that has
published thousands of stories pushing the Russian collusion hoax, lamented: "[W]e live in an environment where people are
able to spread crazy conspiracy theories and absolute falsehoods and lies."
In
supposed apology to Richard Jewell, Tom Brokaw revises history. Like his deeply flawed coverage of the 1996
Olympic bombing, Tom Brokaw's so-called apology this week to the late Richard Jewell leaves much to be desired. [...]
Brokaw's idle speculation and sloppy reporting ended up costing NBC more than $500,000 in a settlement to Jewell. The
network announced the payout in an intentionally vague statement that claimed it had "resolved" its differences with Jewell's
lawyers "after a vigorous and thoughtful exchange of views in which both sides defended the correctness of their positions."
NBC's refusal to admit error is important because it brings us to the second problem with Brokaw's supposed apology. He
writes, "when the truth emerged i [sic] apologized." I find no evidence of Brokaw doing any such thing in 1996 after Jewell
was cleared as a potential suspect. I checked the LexisNexis archives and found nothing. Searches of NBC News's
online properties also yielded no results.
Mueller's
Ethically-Challenged 'Pit Bull' Andrew Weissmann Joins NBC as 'Legal Analyst'. Andrew Weissmann is a former
Justice Department official who is known for engaging in ruthless and unethical behavior in several high-profile cases.
Gen. Michael Flynn's attorney Sidney Powell, in fact, made him the lead villain in her book "Licensed to Lie" and has
labeled him "the poster boy for prosecutorial misconduct." Weissmann will be offering advice to House Democrats for
their impeachment inquisition against President Trump in his new position at NBC/MSNBC, further confirming the hyper-partisan
nature of the Mueller probe. On MSNBC Wednesday [11/13/2019], he stressed that Democrat lawmakers need to present a
case to the American people, arguing that Trump needs to be impeached right away, rather than waiting for the election to
decide the president's fate.
Chuck
Todd's Softball: Are Republicans 'Sabotaging' the Impeachment? Call NBC's Sunday morning show Meet the
Press doesn't really meet what you see any more. Chuck Todd interviewing Democrats sounds more like an episode of
Meet the Helper. Todd's interview with liberal Rep. Jim Himes was all about helping Himes discuss how the
Democrats need to break through and impeach the president. For example, he discussed how Democrats are dropping the
phrase "quid pro quo," and asked "Do you feel as if that word doesn't penetrate the seriousness that happened?" When Todd
asked Himes about the Republicans, he helpfully suggested the Republicans might be "sabotaging the process" by having a
different narrative that makes the process "hard to follow for the public." Todd isn't about to make anything difficult for
the Democrats.
Why
Is Vindman a War Hero but Flynn a Traitor? The network coverage of the testimony of National Security Council
staffer Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman as a "bombshell" and "damning" was laughable and dishonest, implying that his
service to his country wearing its uniform made him a credible and unbiased witness without a political agenda.
Particularly egregious were the comments of NBC News anchor Lester Holt, who equated wartime courage with peacetime candor.
Meet the Press:
The Ongoing Collapse. In 2007, a brilliant moderator named Tim Russert hosted the important Sunday news program
called Meet the Press (MTP). Then, 12 years ago, MTP attracted 821,000 viewers aged 25 to 54. The
history of MTP is a storied one. It is considered the longest-running program in television history with its inaugural
episode airing in 1947. But the days of bipartisan comity and friendly debate ended with the unfortunate passing of
Russert in 2008. After several false starts (does the name David Gregory ring a bell?), Chuck Todd was named the host
in 2014. Unfortunately, Todd turned out to be a disastrous choice. Todd's extreme partisanship is perhaps guided
by his wife (Kristian Denny Todd), who openly runs a Democrat propaganda operation. The firm provides "direct mail and
consulting services for Democratic candidates and progressive causes." But Todd himself appears to be nothing less than
a Democrat activist.
It's
Not The News Dividing Us. It's The News Media. We on the Right know that narrative is not everything.
The Left thinks narrative establishes the truth, but we know the truth has a voice of its own, and the truth will speak out
no matter what story you tell. Even in the former Soviet Union, where propaganda narrative nearly drowned out reality,
reality ultimately had its revenge. Here, where information still flows around the massive wall of lies built by ABC, NBC,
Google and YouTube, the New York Times, CNN and all the rest, the truth's effects are even more immediate when things in the
country are going relatively well — and NBC's Chuck Todd comes out and declares we're in a national nightmare because
we won't buy into the Democrat's latest absurd impeachment Kabuki show. It doesn't cause Americans to real in nightmarish
horror; it only makes Chuck Todd look like a dishonest child, a hysterical old woman, a scurvy purveyor of false
information — plus a hysterical child masquerading as a dishonest old woman.
Chuck
Todd — Just Like the Ukraine Hoax — Is Unraveling Before Our Eyes. Chuck Todd has always
had a tough time accepting the results of the 2016 presidential, especially after he declared Hillary Clinton the winner a
month before the votes were counted. And as a result, over the past three years, we've watched Todd beg then-House
Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) to impeach Trump, and then use BuzzFeed's fake news to assure us Trump's impeachment was guaranteed,
and then break the North American speed record for spreading four lies in under a minute, and then completely buy into the
Russia Collusion Hoax, and then, [...]
MSNBC:
Only Liberal Media Watchers Understand 'Sins of the President'. Appearing on MSNBC Live With Stephanie
Ruhle on Friday morning [10/4/2019], NBC News senior media reporter Dylan Byers warned that President Trump's reaction to
the Democrats' impeachment push was a "very strategic effort" and argued that only those getting their news from liberal
media outlets would truly understand the "sins of the President." [...] [J]ust minutes before this segment, anchor Stephanie Ruhle
declared the President to be a "sociopath" and labeled all Republicans as his "enablers." Not exactly sober news coverage.
Donald
Trump says NBC should fire Debra Messing for calling his black supporters 'mentally ill'. Donald Trump
ratcheted up an attack on 'Will & Grace' actress Debra Messing on Thursday, calling for NBC to fire from the program over her
suggestion that Hollywood liberals blacklist wealthy donors of the Republican president. She also suggested that black
supporters of the president are mentally ill. She since since apologized on Twitter for the 'reckless' action while
maintaining that Trump is targeting minorities.
A tough week
for NBC! First, Lawrence O'Donnell got ahead of his source and presented a lie to a national audience.
He said his source had told him that a Russian bigwig had cosigned a Trump loan at a German bank. Within 24 hours, that
story and that source were out running for their lives. Why? The source had not seen any of the documents.
It was your classic "we want Trump to fail" so we will just repeat whatever anyone tells us as long it makes the president
look bad. Second, the media ran with another one about President Trump denying citizenship to children of U.S. military
personnel. It was huge, and several Spanish-speaking news services called me for an opinion. I told them to
research the story further, because it did not make any sense.
NBC
News: "Heterosexuality Is Just Not Working'. Women are increasingly opting out of heterosexuality because
it is "the bedrock of their global oppression," NBC News asserted in a bizarre opinion piece this week. "Men need
heterosexuality to maintain their societal dominance over women," writes Marcie Bianco for the NBC News website.
"Women, on the other hand, are increasingly realizing not only that they don't need heterosexuality, but that it also is
often the bedrock of their global oppression."
Rice
Shuts Down NBC Claim Race Relations [are] 'Worse' Under Trump. During an interview with former Secretary of
State Condoleezza Rice for the Third Hour Today show on Thursday [6/20/2019], NBC reporter Sheinelle Jones grilled the
prominent African American Republican on whether race relations were "worse" under President Trump. Rice immediately
rejected the notion and called on the press to knock off the "hyperbole" in its coverage.
NBC Resurrects Brian
Williams. Former NBC Nightly News anchor Brian Williams whose career imploded after he was caught lying on the
air in 2015 about being on a helicopter in a combat zone in Iraq in 2003 has apparently made it back into the good graces at
the network. Williams appeared at the recent upfronts — an annual presentation where networks preview their
fall programs for advertisers, which is normally reserved only for the network's stars and an event that Williams hasn't been
a part of since his downfall.
MSNBC
Reporter Compares Climate Change to Alien Invasion. On MSNBC Monday afternoon [5/6/2019], NBC News technology
correspondent Jacob Ward was so concerned about a new United Nations climate change report that he compared the issue to an
alien invasion and feared that humanity was failing to confront an "existential threat." Even liberal anchor Stephanie Ruhle
thought he was going too far.
NBC
News CAUGHT Using Fake Photo of Baby With Measles In Pro-Vaccine Segment. NBC News was caught using a fake
photo of a baby with measles in a segment attacking anti-vaccination "myths." The Christian podcast "A Call For An
Uprising" caught NBC in the act. The photo NBC News used in the segment was merely a doctored stock photo of a newborn
baby in a doctor's arms.
If It Walks
Like a Spy, Talks Like a Spy, Acts Like a Spy. Attorney General William Barr used the S-word yesterday
[4/10/2019]. In public. [...] He quickly followed by saying, "But the question is whether it was predicated, adequately
predicated." In other words, "Yeah, they spied, but it might well have been by the book." No matter. He'd said the
S-word and Democrats and the media (but I repeat myself) went apoplectic. Nancy Pelosi was shaking like she was covered
in ants. Barr is "going off the rails." Senators Chuck Schumer and Richard "Stolen Valor" Blumenthal demanded Barr
retract. NBC's Chuck Todd, over the sound of Tim Russert rolling over in his grave, moaned "The attorney general gaslit
the country." Todd insisted there's "zero factual basis" for saying Obama administration spied on the Trump campaign.
William
Barr Confirms Breitbart News, Mark Levin on Obama Administration 'Spying' on Trump Campaign. Attorney General
William Barr told the Senate on Wednesday that he believed the Obama administration did, in fact, spy on President Donald
Trump's 2016 presidential campaign. Democrats and their media allies howled in outrage and derision. Speaker of
the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) said that Barr "is going off the rails." NBC News' Chuck Todd said that Barr "gave credence
to a factless conspiracy theory." But Barr merely confirmed what is already known.
NBC
News, to Claim Russia Supports Tulsi Gabbard, Relies on Firm Just Caught Fabricating Russia Data for the Democratic
Party. NBC News published a predictably viral story Friday [2/1/2019], claiming that "experts who track
websites and social media linked to Russia have seen stirrings of a possible campaign of support for Hawaii Democrat Tulsi
Gabbard." But the whole story was a sham: The only "expert" cited by NBC in support of its key claim was the firm
New Knowledge, which just got caught by the New York Times fabricating Russian troll accounts on behalf of the Democratic
Party in the Alabama Senate race to manufacture false accusations that the Kremlin was interfering in that election.
NBC,
NY Times Set Up 'Trump About To Cave' Narrative. As the government shutdown barrels toward the one-month mark
with no sign Republicans are caving or the president is having second thoughts, the mainstream media has taken to attempting
to nudge things in the Democrats' direction. NBC News attempted to push the president by declaring his poll numbers
were declining.
NBC's myth
of sawing through the wall. NBC reporters showed they know as much about saws as they do AR-15s. The
network reported, "President Donald Trump has repeatedly advocated for a steel slat design for his border wall, which he
described as 'absolutely critical to border security' in his Oval Office address to the nation Tuesday. But Department
of Homeland Security testing of a steel slat prototype proved it could be cut through with a saw, according to a report by
DHS. I seriously doubt Homeland Security said they sawed through the steel.
NBC
News Tries to Excuse Alleged Child Predator with Sob Story. Identity politics have so warped the establishment
media's collective hive minds that, just because he was black and gay, NBC News is singing the praises of a 20-year-old man
who allegedly sought out a 14-year-old boy for sex. In a lengthy piece that has to be read to be believed, here is
NBC's glowing biography of an alleged child predator: [...]
Here are the
Most Egregious Fake News Stories of 2018. [#13] Andrea Mitchell says disgraced Florida election official is a
Republican: Allegations of voter fraud and electoral misconduct in Florida during the 2018 midterms brought Broward
County Elections Supervisor Brenda Snipes into the spotlight. Snipes, a Democrat, had been accused of misconduct in the
past and was slammed again for violating Florida election law. NBC's Andrea Mitchell bafflingly said on air that Snipes
is a Republican and "hardly a Democratic official, or someone doing the bidding of the Democratic candidates there."
NBC
Tries, Fails To Defend Itself After Sitting On Information That Undermined Kavanaugh Accusers. An NBC reporter
who interviewed one of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh's accusers, and who admitted to sitting on evidence that two of
his accusers were not credible, is now trying to defend herself and her network. It's not working. [...] Last Thursday
[10/18/2018(?)], NBC acknowledged that a second accuser represented by attorney Avenatti, whose name is still unknown, said
her words were "twisted" in her sworn statement and that she never saw Kavanaugh spike punch or act inappropriately toward
women. NBC had this information days before Kavanaugh's confirmation vote, but didn't report it until now. On
Saturday, Snow took to Twitter to defend herself and her network for sitting on information that could have helped Kavanaugh
gain some of his reputation back after the salacious allegations.
Why
Did NBC And Time Magazine Sit On Their Avenatti Scoops For So Long? I think Time has an excuse. I can't
imagine what NBC's excuse is. Remember that newsy quote from him about Democrats needing to nominate a "white male" to
stop Trump in 2020? That came from a story in Time magazine. Avenatti responded predictably when liberals began
attacking him over it yesterday, crying FAKE NEWS and demanding that Time reporter Molly Ball provide the full context.
So she did. Here's the transcript posted last night of her exchange with Avenatti. Note the date. [...]
NBC
News Hid Information that Would Have Cleared Kavanaugh of Avenatti Rape Allegations. NBC News deliberately hid
vital information that would have helped clear Brett Kavanaugh of the serial rape allegations Julie Swetnick and her
attorney, Michael Avenatti, leveled against him. On September 16, Kavanaugh and his loved ones were dropped into a pit
of hell due to allegations of sexual assault from Christine Blasey Ford. Although her story quickly fell apart during
public testimony, for the three-plus weeks that would follow, in an effort to derail his confirmation, Democrats and their
allies in the establishment media did everything in their power to personally destroy this man as a drunken serial
rapist. NBC News and Avenatti played a huge role in this obscene smear campaign. One notable example was NBC
breathlessly publishing and airing an assault allegation against Kavanaugh that was quickly exposed as a hoax. NBC did
not even bother to independently corroborate this allegation prior to airing it. A Democrat handed NBC the smear, and
NBC ran with it.
After
Promoting Avenatti Accusers NBC Tries Walking Quietly Toward the Exits. Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck
Grassley sent a criminal referral to the DOJ today surrounding Creepy Porn Lawyer Michael Avenatti and claims from the
accusers he brought forth. Hours later, all of a sudden NBC, the primary advocacy media for Avenatti and his accusers,
starts publicly questioning the details of their interactions?
NBC
Belatedly Corrects Fake News Story on Trump and Robert E. Lee. NBC News issued a correction Sunday of its
inaccurate tweet Friday that President Donald Trump had praised Confederate General Robert E. Lee at a rally in Ohio,
misquoting the president and leaving out the context that he was setting up praise of Union General Ulysses S. Grant.
Fake
News and News Fraud. Rather than functioning as a news organization, NBC news simply allowed itself to be used
as a PR outlet promoting the clearly self-interested complaints of its source, just as Andrew Duehren at The Wall Street
Journal did the following day. And why? This isn't "fake news." It is news fraud. It is a conscious failure
to cover an equally critical part of a news story that isn't hidden, but sitting there in plain sight. It is a conscious
choice by a news organization to only run the allegations of a source and allow selective use of a tape offered as bait to support
those allegations and in the process provide only negative information on the Trump administration. [...] "Fake news" may often
be a matter of opinion, but a blatant case of intentional news fraud against the fair presentation of a news story of interest
to Americans is hard to miss.
My
Declaration of Incivility. All around us the organized left (establishment media, Hollywood, and Democrats) are
lamenting the loss of civility. Of course, to express this lament, they must first take a break from calling us [names]
throughout the halls of the U.S. Capitol. Oh, and they must also take a break from bullying us out of public spaces and
calling for more even more mobs to be vigilant so we face a "life sentence" of bullying. With no professional
consequences, NBC News is not only calling Trump a "Nazi," NBC News is smearing his supporters as "Nazis" — and I
do not mean figuratively. NBC News is not being coy about calling us Nazis. NBC News is not nibbling around the
edges of calling us Nazis. NBC News is straight-up calling us Nazis.
The Top 50 Liberal
Media Bias Examples. [#12] Fake Exploding GM Trucks: In 1993 on its Dateline NBC program, NBC News was
determined to smear trucks made by General Motors. The TV newsers wanted to show America that the gas tanks in GM
trucks were prone to exploding. Dateline aired footage of just that causing a PR nightmare for GM. Ultimately,
NBC had viewers convinced that GM's "sidesaddle" gas tank was a hazard. But in its zeal to destroy GM, NBC forgot to
mention one little thing to the viewing public. Its video of an exploding gas tank was little else but Hollywood
special effects. The video did not show an actually exploding gas tank, but one rigged to explode on cue by NBC's
special effects artists. NBC's anti-capitalist crusade turned into a circus and network had to apologize for its lies.
'Fake
Pocahontas' Warren Sends Up Smoke Signals on Any New EPA Chief. This past week, President Trump held a campaign
rally in Montana for the Republican running against Jon Tester who spread vicious stories about Trump's doctor who was
nominated to lead the VA. He had to resign over the false rumors. During the rally, the President jokingly offered a
million dollars to Elizabeth Warren if she would take a DNA test to prove her so-called Native-American heritage. It is
a claim she has used so well to get ahead. After the rally, NBC embarrassingly tried to defend her with an obviously
deceptive report. NBC 'News' no longer even tries to pretend they're reporting honestly. They said DNA tests
can't qualify for tribal citizenship. No one asked for Warren's proof of tribal membership. One must wonder who
came up with that argument.
Earth
to NBC: Russians did not change one vote in 2016. CNN just lost its Fake News crown to NBC. Its effort to
win the gold has been Olympic this month. The network sent its anchor to Pyongyang to show what a paradise North Korea
is. Then it (and the rest of the Fake News media) fawned over Caligula Jong Un's sister. Then it lied and said
Koreans admire the Japanese. No, Koreans hate the Japanese after 35 years of cruelty when Japan colonized Korea.
Now the Trump administration is pushing back twice as hard. The subject is not the Olympics. The subject is Fake
News reporting by NBC on the long discredited Democratic Party's excuse that Russia meddled in the past presidential election.
NBC
News Presents Eight-Month-Old 'Russia Hacked the Election' Story as 'Breaking News'. NBC News conducted an interview
with Obama era Department of Homeland Security (DHS) cybersecurity chief Jeanette Manfra Wednesday [2/7/2018], then tweeted out a
largely inconsequential revelation from last year as "BREAKING" news. [...] Compounding NBC News's erroneous "breaking" claim is
that the original, five-month-old revelation later was proven to be wildly exaggerated and amounted to very little.
Time magazine
Time
Magazine Pays the Price for Lost Credibility. Last week in this space the focus was
on Time magazine's glorification of now Democrat presidential nominee Vice President Kamala
Harris. The point was that the then-current cover of Time — an illustration of Harris
that, as noted, presented her as "a cross somewhere between Miss America and a religious icon" —
was in reality an illustration of just how the "mainstream media" was thoroughly in the tank for
Democrats and the Left in general, and, this election year, Harris in particular. A week
later, the New York Post is headlining another story about Time — a story that might
be seen as reporting on the consequences for Time for tilting so visibly for Democrats.
[...] This isn't rocket science. The problem is that the "journalists" involved, whether at
Time or other so-called "mainstream" publications are in fact seriously Left minded Leftist
activists pretending — to themselves and readers — to be something they are not. Which is
politically neutral, "just the facts" journalists.
For
the geniuses at Time magazine, it's news when a woman gets pregnant. When I was
growing up, Time magazine was a staid, very middle-of-the-road publication. Now, it's a rag
so radical that it felt compelled to publish a long screed about how Florida's 15-week abortion
limit is causing problems for "trans men" who didn't understand that continuing to have
heterosexual intercourse could lead to pregnancy. Shefali Luthra, the article's author, is a
young pro-abortion activist. She recently published a book entitled Undue Burden:
Life and Death Decisions in Post-Roe America. [...] Clearly, the entire essay is nonsense, but
it's nonsense that has legs because America has spent two decades indoctrinating people to believe
that there's no connection between biological reality and people's behavior and the consequences
flowing from that behavior. If biological women have sex with biological men, biological
babies can occur, and that's true even if one of the parties has been poisoning his or her body
with opposite-sex hormones.
Here are the
Most Egregious Fake News Stories of 2018. [#23] Time magazine's family separation cover featuring crying
Honduran child: Time Magazine published an infamous cover in June that showed a Honduran child crying at the U.S.
border, apparently after she had been separated from her mother. The image quickly became the face of the "issue of
family separations at the border," despite the fact that the child in question was never separated.
TIME
Stands By Erroneous Crying Girl Cover Story Because Of Its Propaganda Value. TIME magazine is standing by a
cover photo and story critical of Trump's immigration policies that reporters exposed Friday as factually incorrect, wildly
misleading, and lacking important context. The cover features a 2-year-old Honduran girl sobbing as she looks up at
Trump, with the words "Welcome to America." Inside, TIME reported the little girl was one of those separated from her mother
because of the Trump administration's zero tolerance policy on families crossing the border illegally. She was taken
"screaming" from her mother by border agents, the report claimed. The photo and story made a big splash in the media
war over the separation policy, which Trump has since ended, but both have now been completely dismantled by the press,
resulting in a major correction.
Time
apologizes for cover story about migrant girl. Time magazine has issued a correction to a controversial cover
story about a Honduran migrant girl who they said was taken from her mother by US border patrol agents after it was revealed
that the pair were never separated at all. Three-year-old Yanela Denise became the unintentional face of the now
defunct family separation crisis after photographer John Moore captured her agonized face screaming as her mother was
questioned by agents on June 12. After the picture was taken, the pair were taken together to a family detention
center. Yanela's father has since told DailyMail.com that they are 'safe'.
Father
says little Honduran girl on Time cover was not taken from mother. The Honduran toddler pictured sobbing in a
pink jacket before U.S. President Donald Trump on an upcoming cover of Time magazine was not separated from her mother at the
U.S. border, according to a man who says he is the girl's father.
Mother Of Crying Child
Was Previously Deported In 2013. The mother of the crying child featured on the cover of TIME Magazine was
previously deported from the United States in 2013, according to ICE. TIME Magazine pasted the image of the young girl
crying as President Donald Trump looked down on her, attempting to symbolize the administration's zero-tolerance immigration
policy at the border that leads to family separations. The father of the child later revealed that the girl was never
separated from the mother and that the child was only briefly set down so that border patrol agents could perform a pat
down. The mother also left three other children behind in Honduras.
Fake
photo, fake news, fake media and the engineering of fake outrage to push an open borders invasion of America.
The now-infamous "family separation" photo [...] taken by John Moore and licensed by Getty Images, has become the emotion-infused
rallying cry for fact-devoid Leftists to demand unlimited open borders that would flood the United States with illegals.
It has now emerged that the photo is "fake" in the sense that the girl wasn't separated from her mother at all.
Young girls cry for a million reasons: They're sleepy, they want more ice cream, they don't like the food, and so on.
But the deceptive left-wing media claimed this girl in particular was crying because she was forcibly separated from her mother
by U.S. Border Patrol. That claim, we now know, is a complete lie. But it fits the convenient narrative of the
insidious Left — which cares nothing about actual facts — and so the photo has been widely circulated on
Fakebook and even used to raise nearly $20 million in donations for pro-open borders front groups.
TIME
Magazine admits screaming migrant girl cover is FAKE news, but says it "captures" a real story, so it doesn't matter. The cover
[of Time magazine] features a crying two-year-old Honduran girl who appears to be looking up at President Donald Trump, who is looking
back down at her dispassionately. The cover comes with the caption: "Welcome to America." The story inside is another
Left-wing hit piece criticizing the Trump administration's practice of separating some migrant children from the lawbreaking adult parent
as it enforces a "zero-tolerance" policy of prosecuting all illegal crossers. But there's a catch regarding the cover photo of the
little girl: She was never separated from a parent. It's a lie. It's the fakest of fake news. It's intentionally
misleading. It's a hoax.
Time
Magazine Stands by Its Fake Cover, Misleading Story. The profound irresponsibility of the media reached fever
pitch this week. The absence of any sense of guilt on the part of the 'journalists' is frightening. They don't
even recognize the inherent evil in what they are doing. [...] News outlets are not seeking the truth. They believe
Trump is a danger to America and they are justified in doing whatever they want or have to do.
Sarah
Sanders Torches Media over Immigration Photo Hoax. White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders blasted the
establishment media Friday for spreading a now-debunked hoax-photograph featuring a little girl crying at the border.
"It's shameful that dems and the media exploited this photo of a little girl to push their agenda," Sanders tweeted.
"She was not separated from her mom. The separation here is from the facts. Dems should join POTUS and fix our
broken immigration system."
Fake
News: Iconic Crying Migrant Girl Was Never Separated from Mother, Says Father. The father of the tearful
two-year-old Honduran migrant girl who became the face of the "family separation" news coverage says that his young daughter
was never actually separated from her mother when caught by U.S. Border Patrol. Instead, he says, his daughter and her
mother are together in U.S. custody at "at a family residential center in Texas." Moreover, the mother had been
deported from the U.S. in 2013, according to a statement given by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to Buzzfeed on
Thursday evening [6/21/2018].
[The]
Crying migrant child in [a recent] photo [was] never separated from her mother. Now the facts come out, and
pretty quickly, too. Somene tracked these people down and asked them about it, and now we learn the real story:
Turns out the kid was never separated from her mother, not once. The girl's father, Denis Javier Varela Hernandez, was
located by the always-on-the-job Daily Mail, and told a very different story from what the press had been reporting.
One, the kid wasn't separated. Two, family separation indeed occur, from the Honduran illegal immigrant's side.
The girl's mother had actually abandoned three other children and her father, to take the one-year-old toddler, through the
hands of smugglers, to the U.S. illegally, without the father's permission. She in fact didn't tell anyone.
Three, this was no poverty story: The kid's expensive shoes and jacket offered a hint of that in the photo, but now it
turns out the mother apparently lived a very wealthy life, her spouse or babydaddy a sea captain over in Puerto Cortes.
She had a spare $6,000 handy to pay a human smuggler for the crossing, according to the father. Oh, and she's been
deported before, in 2013, a multiple entry case with little regard for U.S. law, as so many of them are. And instead of
inhuman treatment, the father says she's comfortable and well-cared for by Americans over in McAllen, Texas.
Time
Magazine Stands by Its Fake Cover, Misleading Story. The Time Magazine story gets more absurd by the day.
It is perhaps the worst example of fakery and yellow journalism yet. Time Magazine is standing by their fake cover
story of a crying 2-year old Honduran girl because it offers the propaganda they are looking for. The cover features a
2-year-old Honduran girl sobbing as she looks up at Trump, with the words "Welcome to America." They pretended the tiny
child was separated from her mother. As it happens, the little girl was crying because she was in the hot desert and it
was 11 at night. The mother abandoned her husband and three children in Honduras where her husband has a good job as a
ship's captain. She took the toddler as insurance to get into the country. It's her second illegal entrance,
making it a felony.
Thoughts
on Crying Babies, Dying Babies, and Media Deception. Also this week, "TIME magazine featured a picture of a
crying illegal immigrant child on its cover. The child was supposedly separated from her parents; over her looms Donald
Trump, smugly staring down at her." And the cover caption reads, "Welcome to America." What a brute he is!
What a heartless monster! What an evil man! But, as Ben Shapiro notes, "There's only one problem: the cover
is total bull. It's not just total bull because Trump hasn't implemented a newly-developed policy of separating
children from parents — that's an operation of law under the Flores settlement as modified by a 2016 Ninth Circuit
court ruling. It's bull because this particular child wasn't separated from her mother, her mother wasn't fleeing
persecution but did falsely claim asylum, her mother did put the child in danger, and Trump was targeted by the media for
treating this mother and child exactly the same way the Obama administration would have."
Liberals
Are Pushing The Country To The Edge. Time magazine used to be important, used to have standards. But when
they used the picture of a little illegal alien girl who was not separated from her mother on their cover to represent all
illegal alien children at the border because she was crying and perfectly fit their narrative they crossed a line. When
they were informed of the fraudulent nature of the picture they chose to ignore it, choosing activism over accuracy.
They chose emotion over truth.
Crying
migrant girl's dad says she wasn't separated from mom. The sobbing Honduran toddler in a pink
jacket — whose photo was placed alongside an image of President Donald Trump for an upcoming Time magazine
cover — wasn't actually separated from her mother, her father said. The picture of the crying little
girl — taken at the US-Mexico border by Getty Images — became a symbol of the movement against Trump's
"zero tolerance" policy, which tore more than 2,000 children from their parents. "My daughter has become a symbol of
the ... separation of children at the US border. She may have even touched President Trump's heart," Denis Valera, who
said he was her father, told Reuters.
Time
magazine cover features Trump staring down a crying migrant child. The latest cover of Time magazine criticizes
President Trump's tough border policy, by showing him looking down at a crying, two-year-old Honduran girl whose mother was
detained after crossing the border. The photoshopped image is the latest ding against Trump and his zero tolerance
policy, which led to the increased family separation of illegal immigrants. The cover is captioned, "Welcome to America."
You Know The Real Reason Why Time Mag Is Going
Down the Drain? The Content! For all the tears that get shed over the beginning of the middle of
the end for Mr. Luce's mag and newsweeklies in general, one obvious explanation generally gets glossed
over: They are mostly written by conventional-wisdom mongerers who can barely finish shipping an
issue of "Why Dinosaurs Believed in God" and "The Mother Mary Holy Water Diet" before rushing out
something like this time-waster by esteemed historian David M. Kennedy.
Time:
Right-Wing Militias Are The Real Threat To Cops. Time Magazine warned of a growing threat to cops
nationwide in September 2010. The nationally renowned publication argued that sinister individuals would
launch targeted attacks against police officers and even ambush them in their patrol cars. Time alerted
readers that these groups and individuals have a disturbing hatred of cops and that there was a real threat
of "lone-wolf" attacks. Who are these groups that present such a threat to police? Right-wing militias,
according to Time.
Hey, Fareed, You've Got a
Paragraph; You Didn't Write That. In penning his recent piece "The Case for Gun Control," Time editor and CNN host Fareed
Zakaria actually made the case that he needs to focus on pen control. Because he plagiarized part of his work from a New Yorker article
written by one Jill Lepore. Zakaria was busted by NewsBusters, a feat that probably wasn't too difficult since Lepore's piece was published
less than four months ago.
Will Yale Fire Fareed Zakaria? There is now
little question that Fareed Zakaria is guilty of plagiarism. He has admitted copying a portion of a New Yorker essay and apologized. Time,
where Zakaria works as a columnist, has suspended Zakaria for a month, and CNN — owned by the same parent company — has suspended him
pending an investigation. This represents a mere slap on the wrist for someone whose standard speaking fee is $75,000.
A few days later... Fareed Zakaria's suspension lifted by CNN and Time.
All is forgiven for Time magazine writer and CNN host Fareed Zakaria, who last week was suspended by both outlets for apparent plagiarism. CNN said on
Thursday [8/16/2012] that Zakaria's weekly "GPS" public affairs program will return to the air on 26 August.
The Washington Post
Media
Claims Woman Was Arrested For Miscarriage. Here's What Really Happened. Ever
since Roe v. Wade was overturned and abortion was returned to the states, the media has been
searching for stories of pregnant women to use as pawns to demonize those against abortion.
This week, The Washington Post published a story about a Nevada woman who had a miscarriage and was
arrested and charged with manslaughter. The story was widely shared on social media, with New
York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof amplifying that narrative. [Tweet] It appears Kristof,
like many others, didn't read the full Post story, which explains — albeit while
attempting to downplay the situation — that Patience Frazier did things intended to end
her pregnancy and admitted as much to law enforcement. For starters, Frazier's arrest took
place in 2018, four years before Roe was overturned. Abortion is also legal in Nevada,
even now that Roe is no longer in place.
Staffers
quit and 200,000 subscribers cancel after WaPo says its role is to report the news.
Given their mission to report facts, the Post generally refused to endorse particular political
candidates. Individual opinion columnists of course expressed their support for candidates of
their choosing, but the Board of Editors did not endorse those candidates, at least not
explicitly. Only relatively recently, in 1976, did they begin routine endorsements. At
that time, they were at the height of their power and could afford whatever ill will their
endorsements generated among some readers and staff. Their endorsements were almost always of
Democrats: Jimmy Carter, Walter Mondale, Michael Dukakis, Al Gore, John Kerry, and so
on. It was predictable. There are several problems with predictable endorsements.
The first is that they have no persuasive power. If the Post always endorses the
Democrat, then who is going to be persuaded by their endorsement of the Democrat this
time? The second problem is that endorsements predictably favoring one political party risk
the reputation of the newspaper as an objective source of news.
Uncovering
the Coverage. I first heard it, very faintly, in 2017. At the time, President
Donald Trump was accused of spying for Russia. If true, this would have been the biggest act
of treason in American history, bigger than Aldrich Ames, bigger than the Rosenbergs, bigger than
Benedict Arnold. The New York Times and Washington Post published long articles
that detailed Trump's treachery, for which they shared a Pulitzer Prize. Adam Schiff, head of
the intelligence committee, stood up night after night on cable news, claiming he had secret
"bombshell" information proving that Trump was a traitor. The charges were investigated and
ultimately dismissed. Trump was not a Russian agent. He was not working for
Putin. The greatest security threat in the history of the country was — a
hoax. And then I heard it: nothing. Very few outlets reported that Trump was
innocent, that the attempt to rout him from office had failed. Schiff disappeared from
view. There were no corrections, no apologies, no firings. The Times and the
Post did not return their Pulitzer Prizes.
Blaming
Trump for His Assassination Attempt Just Took an Insane Turn at The Washington Post.
The former president dodged a bullet — literally — while golfing at
Trump International Golf Club in West Palm Beach, Florida, over the weekend. Ryan Wesley
Routh was hiding in a shrubbery along the course for 12 hours before Secret Service agents
discovered his location while doing a routine security sweep ahead of the president and uprooted
his evil plan. The course was not fully cleared before Trump's arrival, and there are
questions regarding whether a drone should have been used again. Yet, the media knows the
real culprit of this story is Donald J. Trump. The victim-blaming has been
insufferable. It's a game the Left will lose since their lack of principals and overall
intelligence allow for pervasive outmaneuvering when the rubber hits the road. If Trump is
responsive for January 6, a standard liberal narrative, then Democrats are responsible for
inciting Routh and Thomas Matthew Crooks, the Butler rally assassin, into killing a presidential
candidate. The publication highlighted Trump's love of golf to frame their 'he was asking
for it' narrative: [Tweet]
WaPo:
Kamala is joy, Trump is misery. [Scroll down] The progressive energy and
spending policies of Kamala Harris have caused high inflation everywhere — remember she
was the deciding vote on the Inflation "Reduction" Act. The Democrats have given Russia and
Iran the ability to finance wars and terrorism with high crude oil prices, and their open border
policies have been destroying the United States since the day they took office. But, Harris
is the "joyful" candidate: [...] Kamala's "optimistic" view consists of lying; she continually lies
that the U.S. will not survive if Trump is elected, because she continually lies that Trump is a
dictator. A nation where illegals seize control of apartment complexes? Where people
can't afford groceries? Where the prospect of home ownership for ordinary Americans is
rapidly evaporating? That's an "optimistic" future? Trump's "pessimistic" view is when
he tells the truth about the damage that Kamala has caused with her big government policies, which
would only worsen with four more years.
As
Usual, The Washington Post Gets an Election Story Wrong. One of the problems with
reporters for The Washington Post is that they repeat the claims of liberals as if they are facts,
without questioning the claims or pointing out the patently obvious problems with clearly false
accusations. You can see that in a Page One story Saturday in which the Post blithely reports
that "critics" of a new rule approved by the Georgia State Election Board say it "would empower
county election officials to withhold certification of results without justification, potentially
thwarting a popular result." Nothing could be further from the truth, as is discernible by a
simple reading of the rule, which the five-member Georgia State Election Board approved Aug. 19
by a vote of 3-2. Yet the Post offered no explanation as to how that claim is demonstrably
wrong. Given the Post's bias, we shouldn't be surprised by its shoddy journalism[.]
New
Twists in the DNC Hack Saga. [Scroll down] All these facts illustrates how
flimsy the entire DNC hack narrative is. Yet, that narrative remains deeply entrenched.
While even the media now admits that the Steele dossier was fabricated, they consistently fall back
on the claim that Russia hacked the DNC and, therefore, interfered in the 2016 election to help
elect Trump. We have challenged this narrative from day one for several reasons. First,
there has never been any evidence presented that definitively points to Russia. Second, the
Washington Post's involvement so early in seeding the narrative suggests that the narrative is
likely false. Third, CrowdStrike's immediate conclusion that it was Russia is equally
suspect, especially considering that when CrowdStrike was brought before Congress to repeat their
claims under oath, they could not. Instead, when under oath, CrowdStrike stated that they
only suspected it was Russia but did not possess any hard evidence. Fourth, the FBI and
Mueller's team vigorously promoted the narrative of Russian hacking, despite never having physical
possession of the DNC's server. They relied on CrowdStrike's unsound assertions and their own
preferred narrative.
More
Proof That Fauci, Washington Post Lied About Beagle Torture Program.
[Scroll down] In the intervening years, we've learned that the Washington Post was
either intentionally lying or exceptionally lazy, or both, in that the Beaglegate torture scandal
was absolutely true, the confirmation of which we only got through the diligent efforts of actual
journalists and advocacy groups like WCW Project. Even more [...] evidence has recently
emerged that, on the same day Fauci and Co. were whispering denials into Washington Post's ear,
which the paper dutifully reprinted, the State Department was well aware of the Fauci Beagle
torture regime and in active communication with the NIH-funded lab in question.
Biden
and Harris debut plan to overhaul Supreme Court — with focus on limiting Trump's
powers. President Biden formally unveiled his planned overhaul of the Supreme Court
on Monday — with a clear eye on limiting the powers of former President Donald Trump
should he succeed him. The commander-in-chief took the unusual step of unveiling his major
planned policy steps in a newspaper op-ed, with the Washington Post helpfully telling readers: "The
writer is president of the United States." Biden laid out three main changes to the
court — which he said is "mired in a crisis of ethics" — including term
limits and a binding code of conduct.
The Editor says...
I find it difficult to believe the Washington Post's claim that "The writer is president of the United
States." The man pretending to be the President is only awake for a few hours a day, and was unable to
assemble a meaningful sentence during the televised debate a few weeks ago. When somebody else writes a
sentence for him, he can just barely read it off the teleprompter. Nice try, WaPo.
WaPo
Editorial Board Writes Weird Fan Fiction Withdrawal Speech for Biden. I admit
it. I did not predict that the Washington Post editorial board would write a speech for
President Biden in which he eloquently — lyrically even — agrees to withdraw
from the 2024 presidential race. But write it they did Wednesday, and it reads as if it were
penned by a 19-year-old Vassar student who perhaps may have consumed a mind-altering substance and
is now deep inside an almost otherworldly fantasy.
Sensationalist
blabber from the Washington Post. In The Washington Post's "Genocide is our redline"
(6/9/24, before the title was changed), there are so much manipulation, distortion, and outright
lying that it's hard to encompass it all in a short response. Israel is not only innocent of
this sick crime, but is facing an enemy that boasts in its charter about committing it. This
inversion of thought is right out of George Orwell's 1984. The title is an absolute
lie — even if it's a quote from a Palestinian who makes this charge of Israel.
There is no genocide in Gaza. And no matter how many times it's repeated in chants, legacy
media articles, legacy TV reports, many forms of social media, it doesn't make it so. [...] One
can't rightly be the aggressor and then claim that the other side is committing genocide when it
fights back. What an absurdity. Hamas and Gazan civilians are getting killed because
they initiated a war and are continuing to fight — even if they are losing
terribly. It's on them.
With
Summer Heat Wave Expected, Be Prepared for What the Climate Change Nuts Will Do.
Despite the fact that summer, and the heat associated with that season, comes around reliably every
year, the climate activists behave as if such a thing has never happened before. Ever since
"global warming" and "climate change" (formerly known as "weather") became the environmental
bogeymen, any slight increase in temperature over the summer has been spun as the first sign of the
climate apocalypse. And, this summer's impending heat wave is no different. According
to The Washington Post, the U.S. will be assaulted by abnormally high temperatures thanks to a
"heat dome" forming over the mainland United States. Apparently, temperatures in most of the
continental U.S., especially in the Southeast and the Midwest, are projected to reach the high 90's
and potentially stay that hot at least through June. The National Weather Service likewise
predicted that, with the humidity, the overall heat index for states from Texas to Washington,
D.C., could reach as high as 100 to 110 degrees.
The Editor says...
Lots of things could happend this summer, but probably won't. Yes, summer is the time
for hot weather. That has been the case since Noah got off the Ark, about 2347 B.C.
Hot weather is not a crisis. Hot weather is not a reason to stop burning hydrocarbons. Hot
weather is not a reason to vote for socialists. [#2] How does the Washington Post or the
National Weather Service know, with any certainty at all, what the weather will be like a month
from now? There is so much chaos in the atmosphere, and so many competing forces at work, that
nobody can predict the path of a hurricane more than two or three days in advance, and nobody can
predict the local weather two weeks from now. Chance are it'll be hot, but there is still plenty
of wiggle room.
Don't
Believe Your Lying Eyes! Here is another way to tell that Democrats are
panicking: They feel obliged to deal, somehow, with the fact that Joe Biden is senile.
The Washington Post headlines: "How Republicans used misleading videos to attack Biden in a
24-hour period." ["]President Biden, who at 81 is a couple of decades younger than
many of the veterans he honored during Thursday's D-Day commemoration in Normandy...["]
Well then, he is practically youthful! [...] But the Post says nothing about Biden's Juneteenth
brain freeze, his multiple incidents of falling down, his frequent descents into incoherence, his
need to be led around to show him where to stand, his inability to read a teleprompter, and so
on. Many dozens of episodes of obvious senility have been preserved on video, and many
millions of Americans have seen them.
Fauci
Testimony Forces The Washington Post To Debunk Its Own Fake News. One of the most
comical headlines that came out of Anthony Fauci's testimony before Congress on Monday, in which he
confirmed that there was no scientific evidence for the six-foot social distancing rule, was this
gem by Dan Diamond for The Washington Post: "In the pandemic, we were told to keep six feet
apart. There's no science to support that." Well, fancy that. Fauci's stunning
admission builds on closed-door testimony before the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus back in
January, in which Fauci revealed that the six-foot rule — which underpinned the social
distancing edicts — "sort of just appeared." When multiple Republican members questioned
Fauci on Monday about the origins of these social distancing guidelines, Fauci acknowledged that they
had not been studied in trials and were insufficient to stop the spread of the virus through the air.
No
men are above the law, except theirs. [Scroll down] The Jeff Bezos
Washington Post (under new non-DEI management) said, "Congressional Republicans returned to
Washington this week doubling down on their defense of former president Donald Trump after his
conviction on 34 counts related to falsifying business records. [...]" How dare
Republicans hold Democrats accountable. Of course, we all know nothing will come of this, but
perhaps Republicans will lay the groundwork for criminal prosecutions by Ken Paxton or whomever
becomes attorney general next year. The real fear of Democrats is not the long arm of the law
because they always get away with their felonies. Republicans didn't even bother to hold
hearings on Obama using the FBI to Watergate Trump. What the Party Of Obama fears was buried
in Paragraph 13 of the Bezos Post story: ["]Trump has animated his loyal base of voters
by painting himself as a martyr and repeatedly suggesting that if the Biden administration and
judicial system were not coming after him, they would go after his supporters. Congressional
Republicans say that message has been effective, deeply resonating with constituents back home.["]
Wash
Post Editorial Board follows orders of megalomaniac billionaires: 'Humans might need to re-engineer
the climate'. This is retro 1970s. In the 1970s, they believed fossil fuels
were creating aerosols blocking the sun, creating man-made global cooling. So they came up
with the same kind of geo-engineering solutions back then. They wanted to put black soot on
the Arctic to melt it. There was one proposal was to use nuclear energy to loosen the Arctic
ice caps because they thought they were growing too much. John Holdren (Science Czar) in the
Obama Administration supported geo-engineering, if you will, of the climate. This is radical,
risky, unproven, with unknown effects but they are doing it as a sort of lever over us.
Critical
Bear Studies. I am not a bear expert. [...] But I do know something about narrative
building, and this story from the Washington Post is an excellent example of how one does it.
[Tweet] The story purports to be about the new discoveries that scientists have made in their
research on the California Grizzly Bear. It is, in other words, a piece that is supposedly
grounded in science, expanding our knowledge about a vaguely interesting subject. It isn't a
story about science, Grizzly Bears, or anything similar. It is a thinly veiled essay about
White Settler Colonialism and how bad it is. Far be it from me to defend everything about how
the West was won. The expansion of European settlers into the West was as inevitable as it
was occasionally brutal. With only a few million Native Americans inhabiting two
continents. The Americas make up about 30% of the Earth's land surface and a larger
percentage of the comfortably habitable zones.
The
Washington Post, misleading down to the subheadlines. Even the subheadlines are
substandard at the Washington Post. In "Gazans go hungry as aid groups step back" (04/04/24),
the subheadline reads, "Israel's war has wrecked Hamas civilian rule, with no alternative in
place." The anti-Israel bias at the Post is as clear as the clearest day. It is not
"Israel's war." To say so exposes the authors' animus against Israel, ignoring how this war
started and who the perpetrators were. To remind The Washington Post, on October 7,
thousands of Hamas combatants followed by Gazan civilians stormed through the borders of Israel,
murdering; mutilating civilians, including children and babies; and taking hundreds of hostages,
including babies. Nice sleight of hand, Washington Post, in redirecting to implicate
Israel. It is Hamas's war on Israel, no matter how many times the Post repeats its
canard. It begs one to ask, is the Post on the Hamas payroll?
The
"Airman" Who Set Himself on Fire for Hamas was Antifa Ex-Cult Member. If you had told
the average person that an anarchist or an airman had set himself on fire to protest Israel's
campaign against Islamic terrorists, you would get two very different reactions.
Unsurprisingly the media led with the data point most likely to produce a favorable reaction.
And Aaron Bushnell cynically played the same game, wearing (the wrong) uniform to his Hamas suicide
attempt rather than the Antifa red in which he had been previously photographed. The
Washington Post gets around to admitting that Bushnell was an "anarchist".
The deliberate
lies in the Washington Post. The Washington Post report covers the deaths of
'journalists' in Gaza. Using the list of names provided by 'the Committee to Protect
Journalists' (CPJ), the Post describes the Gazan journalists as brave heroes who paid the ultimate
price just for trying to tell the world the truth. The article implied that not only was
Israeli deliberately killing journalists, but that Israel also targeted some journalist's families
to make sure there would be no witnesses. In many ways the piece is typical of the junk that
much of western media is producing; a transparent attempt to delegitimise Israel by twisting facts
and removing context. The end result is little more than a pro-Hamas propaganda item.
But sometimes, in the rush to demonise Israel, journalists try to be too clever — and in
this case, the Washington Post article can be used to hang those that put it together. We
need just three pieces of evidence to do it.
Washington
Post Blames Grocery Stores For High Prices To Cover For Biden In Election Year. The
Washington Post wants voters to believe that grocery stores, not President Joe Biden's inflationary
policies, are to blame for Americans' continued concern about rising food prices. For three
years, the propaganda press joined the Biden administration in lying about the nation's sticker
shock. They claimed inflation, which hasn't dropped below zero percent since Biden took
office, is "cooling," "falling," and lightening voters' financial loads. It wasn't until
2024, when President Joe Biden's years-long poor performance started hurting his standing in
national presidential polls, that corporate media started reporting on how perpetually high prices
affect families at the grocery store. "Inflation has fallen. Why are groceries still so
expensive?" Washington Post authors Jeff Stein and Abha Bhattarai wondered in a headline on Friday.
This
Washington Post Opinion Piece is Rewriting the Recent History of Border Control. This
isn't the worst piece I've ever read on the border issue but it's not the best either. The
main failure is summed up in the headline: "Forget about securing the border. It won't work."
[...] It's true that there was a big surge of migrants in 2019, but it's also true that surge had
subsided months before the pandemic. Here's a graph showing the surge in 2019. [Not shown
here.] As you can see, there's a sharp peak in May when the southwest border apprehensions hit
144,000 in a single month. But the numbers declined every month after that and by
September 2019 were back down to 52,000. That decline continued. At the start of FY20,
i.e. in October 2019 apprehensions dropped to 35,000. In November they dropped again to 33,000
and in December they were down to 32,000. In other words, FY20 roughly followed the blue line in
the graph above even before anyone had heard about the pandemic. This is obviously not
consistent with the claim that Trump's "draconian policies" didn't work.
Quit
Thinking and Do What You Are Told! Philip Bump, the much-reviled and much-admired
Washington Post columnist (whether you love or hate him depends entirely on your partisan
leanings), has some advice: don't read anything or watch anything unless it comes from the MSM.
Trust the MSM because doing your research leads to believing things that aren't true. You
might wind up believing things like the lab leak theory, that jabs don't work, that kids aren't so
"resilient" after all, and that the Hunter Biden laptop is real. [Tweet] Bump, a philosophy
major whose career started out as being a designer at Adobe, now often writes about politics,
climate change, polls, and everything under the sun. Epidemiology and virology are in his
wheelhouse, too. How he became an expert on all these subjects is beyond me.
The
Washington Post Is in Full-Scale Collapse. Is The Washington Post in full-scale
collapse? A recent look at the numbers provides a fairly convincing answer to that question.
According to the report, not only is the Post losing $100 million a year, but it lost over half
of its online engagement by the end of 2023. The signs were already there by mid-year, and the
worst has come to pass. [Tweets] Having a billionaire sugar daddy has helped mask some of
the issues plaguing the Post, but the tide can only be held back so long. To lose over 50 percent
of its online viewership is catastrophic for an outlet with such high overhead costs. Subscriber
numbers have also nosedived throughout the Biden administration.
Now
There's Proof! Brad Raffensperger Lied to President Trump When He Told Him in Jan 2021
Phone Call There Was No Fraud in 2020 Election. In late December 2020, President
Trump made a call to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger asking him to look at some of
the items that were uncovered by his auditor. There was plenty of evidence for a competent
auditor or any man of integrity to know that the election was uncertifiable. Secretary of
State Brad Raffensberger's office secretly recorded the phone call with President Trump, then lied
about its contents later when they leaked it to the far-left Washington Post. Raffensperger's
office ran to the Washington Post and leaked a fraudulent transcript of the call. After they
were caught lying to the American public, The Washington Post outed Jordan Fuchs as their anonymous
source for the garbage hit piece.
Not
the Babylon Bee. What exactly a "climate disease" is is a mystery until you realize
this term was invented to make a snappy headline. In non-headline speak, these are diseases
that are spread by more frequent interactions between people and wild animals driven out of their
natural environment due to climate change. Or they are diseases we are to believe are made
more common due to climate change. Color me skeptical. Malaria, Dengue fever, and other
diseases have been with us for millennia, and new diseases have been springing up throughout human history.
Taylor
Lorenz Whines About Missing Christmas, Blames the Unmasked. When it comes to the
COVID-19 hysteria, it appears most people have moved on. But others can't seem to let the
pandemic go. Washington Post media activist Taylor Lorenz is one of the latter.
Since it became clear that the coronavirus was no longer a threat, she has been insisting that the
rest of the nation should still go through mask and vaccine mandates and take precautions to keep
people like her safe.
Farhi —
A Flicker of Light in the Post's Darkness. We get the largely unreadable Washington
Post because my husband must have a hard-copy paper with a sports section to read with his
morning coffee. To say its reporting stinks is to overpraise it. Still, Saturday
morning I saw the first glimmer of actual reporting, relegated as it was, nevertheless, to the
ever-lefty fluff of the Style Section: "News from the frontline of culture," per the
Post's website. The article is not on the Post website, and I had to go to
sfgate to find it available online. It seems to me the Post has done what it could to
bury it. Here's why — it exposes the rot in journalism today. [...] It's hard to
believe such journalistic malpractice is not deliberate — an effort to appeal to the
leftists in the President's party to pressure Israel to bow to the thugs of Hamas with whom their
obvious sympathies lie.
WaPo
claims Israel detaining Gazan civilians for no reason at all. In "Israel is detaining
civilians in Gaza. Many have disappeared, families say" (12/11/23), the Gazans interviewed by
the Post claimed that Israel detained their loved ones for essentially no reason at all.
Israel is fighting the hardest type of battle — urban warfare. This grueling war
becomes more arduous when one takes into account that Hamas fights from tunnels, uses civilians as
human shields, and blends into Gaza dressed as civilians. The heart-wrenching interviews are
presented without any additional information the reader needs to know to fully understand this
complex situation. Gaza is run by the totalitarian regime Hamas — a recognized
terrorist organization. Any official reports, news, and interviews from Gaza must be
considered favorable to Hamas and consistent with its extremist message. Any Gazan
contradicting Hamas's messaging does so with extreme risk to his own life, putting into question
the motivations of any news that emanates from the regime territory. And putting out
propaganda is part of Hamas's war effort. That's how totalitarian regimes work. The
Post omits this repugnant reality and did not corroborate the interviews it published.
Front-page
anti-Israel animus at The Washington Post. It was telling, and not unexpected, to see
the front-page, above-the-fold placement of the Washington Post article "Young Palestinians
describe harsh treatment in Israeli jails" (12/04/23) describing alleged Israeli mistreatment of
Palestinian prisoners. With the origin of the recent Israeli/Palestinian war being the broken
ceasefire and subsequent barbaric massacre by Hamas of 1,200 innocent Israeli civilians from
infants to the aged, along with the taking of 240 hostages, also from infants to the aged, it
wasn't surprising to see The Washington Post have an article sympathetic to the initiators of the
massacre — the Hamas-led Palestinians. With the apparent end of what amounted to
an exchange of innocent Israeli hostages with Palestinian criminals, the Post's interest was to
highlight alleged trauma that the Palestinian prisoners received rather than the Israeli hostages
stolen from their homes and families. It is mind-blowing how the Washington Post can attempt
to build a case critical of Israel for claims of, for example, occasional solitary confinement
compared to Hamas gang-raping women, mutilation and dismemberment, and wholesale murder of Jewish
civilians. Hamas cut off the fingers and limbs of children in front of their parents,
murdered parents in front of their children, gouged eyes out. Does the Post really see an
equivalence?
Subtle
Like a Brick Through a Window - CIA Outlet Approves Donald Trump Assassination. I
have stayed away from this subject for eight years; however, everyone in/around U.S. politics knows
the Washington Post, owned by Big Tech Amazon, is effectively the PR firm of the Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA). No one inside the DC beltway does not understand this basic truth.
Therefore, when the husband of State Dept official Victoria Nuland, a man named Robert Kagan,
writes an op-ed in the CIA newsletter, effectively calling for President Trump to receive the
Julius Caesar treatment, the non-subtle message is for the CIA to repeat their Kennedy performance
and kill President Trump. As alarming as this acceptance might sound, there are no
intellectually honest people who would deny it.
Washington
Post Shrinks by 240 More Staffers. The failing, far-left Washington Post has
just cut 120 jobs through buyouts and promised layoffs will commence if 120 more liars, I mean
staffers, do not accept buyouts. In a memo to liars, I mean staffers, Washington Post
CEO Patty Stonesifer said, "We want everyone to understand that we need 240 acceptances to help
restore The Post's financial health. We have made the decision," she added, "that if we fall
short of this goal, to implement involuntary layoffs." "The layoffs," she warned, would offer
"significantly less generous benefits than the voluntary package."
WaPo
reporter hasn't a clue why it's so hard to get an Uber in DC. There's little doubt
that members of elite media live in an entitled bubble of their own choosing, opting to see the
world through a tainted lens that in many cases conveniently favors the Democratic Party, but every
so often they feel compelled to remind us anyway. Take Washington Post senior national
political correspondent Ashley Parker, for example. The "reporter" took to social media to
marvel over why it's so hard to get an Uber in crime-ridden Washington, D.C. [...] Of course, if
Parker put some of her journalistic skills to work it wouldn't take long to stumble across a
big clue to her conundrum.
The
Washington Post's Paul Farhi Shows Why 'Professional' Journalism Can't Be Salvaged.
If The Washington Post were doing journalism instead of propaganda, its reporter who covers the
news media might be focused nonstop on the fact that trust in the media is extremely low. But
Paul Farhi thinks there are more important problems. Namely, he's worried that some unwashed
masses might be practicing their First Amendment right to do journalism without a license.
"Someone invented the phrase 'citizen journalism' a few years ago to describe amateurs doing the
work of pros. Yes, it occasionally works, but probably no more often than 'citizen cop,'
'citizen attorney' or 'citizen soldier,'" he wrote on social media.
WaPo
Reporter Who Questions Validity of Hunter's Laptop Was Recently Awarded for Using It As a
Resource. It can be said there are degrees of hackery when it comes to the journalism
industry. The standard Level 1 example is basic bias and partisanship in the reporting.
Level 2 can be said to have a more activist role, avoiding particular details or working hard
to slant undeniable evidence. This type is seen frequently at Politifact, to give an
example. The lowest has been Level 3, where a journalist delivers information they know
to be incorrect but forges ahead with their agenda as that is far more important than the actual
facts. (This has been on display in rising numbers during the Israeli-Hamas conflict.)
However, at the Washington Post, we have White House reporter Matt Viser seeking to blaze new
trails by delving deeper into the hack-mire and creating an even worse example. More than
just knowing the facts differ, he has intimate knowledge that his claim is completely
fabricated. Not only has he worked on the particular details professionally, he has been
celebrated publicly for doing so, making his latest comment all the more asinine and laughable.
Washington
Post Stands by Totally Debunked Atrocity. What's a fake news outlet like the
Washington Post supposed to do when they get busted for sticking with a horrific headline about a
deadly airstrike that never happened, almost a full day after it was debunked? A decent paper
would retract the story and apologize. I've done just that a number of times over the two
decades I've been writing as VodkaPundit. It's embarrassing, [...] but it has to be
done. But the Washington Post, as I'm sure readers here already know, is not a decent
paper. In fact, readers everywhere must know it because the money-losing progressive
propaganda outlet just announced layoffs of another 240 employees.
Washington
Post omits that Americans were slaughtered by Hamas. When the Washington Post prints
the sub headline, "9 U.S. citizens killed in conflict," and in the first sentence of the article
says, "Nine U.S. citizens have been killed in the fighting between Hamas and Israel," doesn't the
Post find it prudent and newsworthy to say which side killed them? (I saw the piece in an item
titled "Israel orders siege of Gaza Strip" dated Oct. 9, 2023, which seems to have been updated).
The Washington Post must correct this failure to identify the perpetrator. It was clearly
Hamas that perpetrated this cold-blooded murder of Americans, along with the murder of hundreds of
other civilians, while taking grandmothers over 80 and infants as young as 9 months-old as
hostages. In the largest, most murderous part of the attack, Hamas terrorists massacred
nearly everyone in the first and second rows at a musical concert for peace! And they
slaughtered many more.
Cast
Down from Media Olympus. The New York Times and the Washington Post have long been
considered America's journalistic icons, ably representing the professionalism and integrity of
their calling, and deserving their places on the Olympic media peak. [...] But The Post and The
Times have changed, and one can only argue about when the process of their degradation began.
Historically, both papers have represented the Democrats and the left, causing much Republican
criticism. As examples, Republicans during Reagan's day called them "Pravda on the Hudson"
and "Pravda on the Potomac," respectively, but this name-calling was mostly a humorous jab.
Things changed dramatically after Donald Trump announced his first White House bid in the 2016
election. Journalistic integrity and responsible reporting were thrown into the toilet and
replaced by overwhelmingly fake news and stories. Trump must be defeated, and all means were
justified in achieving that goal, including Hillary Clinton's grotesque "Russiagate" campaign to
depict Trump as Vladimir Putin's stooge.
The
deep state is through with Joe Biden. When WaPo's David Ignatius declares the man he
did so much to install in the Oval Office should not seek re-election, it means something.
Actually, it means a lot. Ignatius is a despicable excuse for a "journalist." As I stated
here, Ignatius was a primary mouthpiece for deep state actors peddling the Russiagate
conspiracy. Any journalist with a modicum of integrity and self-respect — given
what everyone should know now, and anyone with any intellectual curiosity should have suspected
even then — would have outed the sources that fed him such bogus and blatantly false
information. Alas, there have been no "mea culpas" from Mr. Ignatius or any outing of
his deep state sources. Ignatius wasn't an unwitting dupe; he was an active participant in
the deep state coup to overthrow a democratically elected president. If this isn't the
definition of sedition, I can't imagine what would be. The logical conclusion that Ignatius
is no more than a mouthpiece for the CIA is hard to escape. This is what makes his call for
Biden to bow out now so significant.
Rewriting
history... it works more often than you think. It's maddening, but true. If
there is a choice between confronting a difficult truth and believing an obvious lie many people
will choose the latter. [...] Karine Jean-Pierre will look the Washington Press Corps in the eyes
and lie with a straight face nearly every day, and they dutifully report what she says as if it is
plausible. [...] Our MSM pulls this same sort of [stuff] all the time on a range of issues. How
many clips of reporters denying that there is a shred of evidence that Joe Biden helped his son
engage in influence peddling? The Washington Post's Philip Bump beclowned himself by claiming
(again) that there is zero evidence that Joe Biden had anything to do with Hunter's business, and
when pressed left a podcast in a huff. [...] Rest assured, though, that Bump will continue pushing
the lie, and vast numbers of people will continue to believe it because the alternative is
confronting a hard truth. How many TV anchors have repeated the same lie that there is no
evidence that Biden was deeply involved in his son's business? [Tweet with video clip]
It's not just Bump. Almost every MSM reporter and commentator has had a changing story about
Joe Biden and Hunter for years now; the only consistent part of that story is that Joe is totally
innocent and ignorant about Hunter's antics.
Lede
with a lie. The Washington Post isn't fit to be fish wrapper. They are a
disgrace. A total, complete, and pathetic disgrace. If and when Democracy Dies in
Darkness, the Post will be the ones who broke all the light bulbs and shut down the power plants
that provided the energy to keep the country lit, cooled, and properly functioning as a modern free
market liberal democracy. I was shocked to see this utter tripe being pushed out by the Post
last night, in which the lede claims that "extreme heat kills more people in the United States than
any other weather hazard." [...] This claim is complete tripe, and for proof you need not look any
further than a story that was in The Washington Post this [past] February. February 16th, in
fact. There has never been any dispute — scientifically — about whether
heat or cold is the larger danger to human existence. In all but the most extreme cases
deaths caused by excessive heat are actually caused by something like dehydration. The simple
expedient of drinking more water would slash the danger dramatically.
Washington
Post quietly 'updates' Hunter Biden laptop story after Devon Archer testimony. The
Washington Post's fact-checking department has yet again quietly updated — rather than
corrected — its most-read story, which contained glaring errors about first son Hunter
Biden's laptop and an infamous dinner involving then-Vice President Joe Biden and Burisma executive
Vadym Pozharskyi. Glenn Kessler, the paper's chief fact-checker, has made six updates and
authored an entirely new article about The Post's bombshell reports in October 2020 and May 2021
that revealed Hunter Biden introduced his father to Pozharskyi at Café Milano in Georgetown
months after joining the natural gas firm's board. The initial fact check relied on
statements from Andrew Bates — then a spokesman for the Biden campaign and now deputy
White House press secretary — and Michael Carpenter, a former Biden foreign policy
adviser and now a permanent US representative to the Organization for Security and Cooperation in
Europe (OSCE).
Washington
Post tries to do a hit job on a non-woke bank that loaned to Trump. President Trump
has had a lot of ups and downs in his real estate career, which means his relations with banks and
credit can be pretty dicey. The matter was made worse for him in the wake of the
January 6 protests, where wokester banks outright cut him off. His Trump Organization
financial operation however did find a bank that would loan to his organization, a relatively small
bank in San Diego called Axos Bank. and that set the Washington Post scrambling to look for some
seedy Biden-style corruption. They found nothing. They must have spent some time on
this, however, because they ran a story, and had to satisfy themselves with innuendo that maybe
something could be wrong.
Jen
Rubin spews tripe about Florida, forcing the WaPo to issue an embarrassing correction.
Jennifer Rubin wrote a column in the Washington Post, absurdly claiming that Florida was so badly run
and so "cruel" its residents were fleeing, basing her entire article on this errant premise, and forcing
the Washington Post to issue an embarrassing correction. [...] The statistic she cited came from some
dingbat at Business Insider who mixed up the inbound numbers of Florida residents with the outbound
numbers of Florida residents — a pretty elementary error. Business Insider had to
correct itself the following day.
Buffoon
alert: WaPo staffer announces solutions for national debt crisis. For months, the
economic geniuses and budget experts at The Washington Post have worked tirelessly to come up with
ways to handle our $32 trillion debt; just look at this excerpt from an article out yesterday and
written by assistant editor Drew Goins: ["]Over the past few months, the Editorial
Board has been doing what lawmakers haven't: pulling together a plan to stabilize the national
debt.["] Let's take a look at the proposals, starting with Social Security:
["]What the board proposes is a broadening of the amount of income the Social Security tax
is levied on; a gradual increase of the full retirement age to keep up with rising life expectancy;
and a decrease in how much very-high-income households receive in benefits ... while increasing
what low-income homes get.["] They want to levy higher taxes against private employees
and employers (maybe even the retirees?) to cover an unpayable debt, but fail to suggest that the
federal employees receiving the generous pensions and healthcare benefits pay more to support the
system that rewards them the most. They suggested cutting from the top, but didn't think to
cap federal pensions.
Are
the media turning against Joe Biden? It's nearly impossible to get as much favorable
press coverage as President Biden received in the first two years of his administration.
Compare him to former President Trump, for example. The Washington Post kept a running total
of all the "false or misleading claims" Trump made, no matter how insignificant or irrelevant they
happened to be. By combing through every word the man uttered about just about anything, the
Post managed to assemble "30,573 false or misleading claims" he made while in office. What
was the quality of these falsehoods? Here are a few hints. One example, counted 250
times by the Post's editors, was: "We rebuilt the United States military." Another, counted nearly
500 times in the Post tally, was a typical presidential boast: "We also built the greatest economy
in the history of the world." Perhaps it was a silly thing for Trump to say — given even
a slightly charitable interpretation, this statement had been true at every point since mid-2010.
But it also remained true until 2021, when the pandemic hit.
Washington
Post bemoans how July 4th 'most polluted day of the year' because of fireworks.
Climate reporters for the Washington Post lectured how fireworks from 4th of July celebrations will
exacerbate air pollution caused by recent wildfires. As millions of Americans prepare to
celebrate the nation's founding with a traditional fireworks display, climate reporters Kasha Patel
and Kate Selig warned that these displays spread harmful pollutants. The piece went as far as
to refer to the holiday as "the most polluted day of the year." "It may come as a surprise,
but the federal holiday stands out as the most polluted day of the year in many locations across
the nation, according to air quality data. Fireworks — the staple of Independence
Day celebrations — light up the sky but also launch harmful pollutants. In some
cases, the pollution levels from the pyrotechnics are similar to severe wildfire smoke," the
article read.
The Editor says...
Socialist Democrats make a lot of rash pronouncements and hope you won't analyze what they've said.
July 4th is a federal holiday, and hardly anybody commutes to their offices, so it's probably one of
the least polluted days of the year. But if you're gonna point fingers, the Canadian wildfires,
which all started at the same time and were probably set by eco-terrorists, don't help the air quality
much. But the combustion of thousands of trees can hardly be compared to the smoke from a few
firecrackers. Sometimes the presence of smoke in the air is a very minor concern, outweighed by
other matters at hand.
WaPo
columnist lies through her teeth and says Joe Biden has 'underrated deal-making
prowess'. For months, Joe Biden said he absolutely would not negotiate. His
spokespuppets repeatedly said there would be no negotiations. [...] With all the government's
endless spending, we always reach the next "debt ceiling" — Biden knew this was
coming, and he essentially did nothing. When he finally decided to "negotiate" at the very
last second, he left town in the middle of the back-and-forth! But now, according to Jennifer
Rubin of The Washington Post, the 100-page deal between Biden and Kevin McCarthy displays
Biden's superior negotiating skills.
Did
WaPo reporters conspire with extremists to attack National Gallery of Art? And if
they did, will anyone from the Washington Post face charges over it? Readers might remember
this stunt from a month ago at the National Gallery of Art, in which climate-change protesters
vandalized a display of an Edgar Degas sculpture. Fortunately, the Washington Post just
happened to have a reporter and a photographer on scene that day to capture the crime and its
aftermath: [...] A grand jury returned an indictment against Smith and Martin yesterday, charging
the pair with felonies for an injury to a National Gallery of Art property (40 US 6303, 6307) and
conspiracy to commit an offense against the United States (18 USC 371). Both could cost the
two defendants up to five years in prison and $250,000 per count, although they're likely to get
shorter sentences than that if they have no prior convictions. But let's get back to the
WaPo's good fortune in having a reporting team on scene when the attack occurred. Was
that just a coincidence? Not according to the grand jury: [...]
Trump's
Truth Social Media Firm Files $3.78 Billion Defamation Lawsuit Against The Washington
Post. Trump Media and Technology Group (TMTG), the parent company of the Truth Social
platform, has taken legal action against The Washington Post, filing a defamation lawsuit seeking a
staggering $3.78 billion in damages. The case was filed late Saturday night in Sarasota
County, Florida, which alleges that far-left WaPo published false and defamatory statements about
the Truth Social platform, its CEO, Devin Nunes, and former President Trump, damaging its
reputation and causing significant financial harm.
Democrats
Are The Brainless Party. After Fetterman's disastrous performance at the Banking
Committee hearing, the Washington Post's Jeff Stein sent a tweet supposedly quoting Fetterman as
saying "Shouldn't you have a working requirement after we bail out your bank? Republicans
seem to be more preoccupied with SNAP requirements for hungry people than protecting taxpayers that
have to bail out these banks." Here's what Fetterman actually said: "The Republicans want to
give a work requirement for SNAP. You know, for a uh, uh, uh, a hungry family has to have these,
this kind of penalties, or these some kinds of word — working uh, require —
Shouldn't you have a working requirement, after we sail your bank, billions of your bank?
Because you seem we were preoccupied, uh when, then SNAP requirements for works, for hungry people,
but not about protecting the tax, the tax papers, you know, that will bail them out of whatever
does about a bank to crash it." When confronted, Stein deleted his tweet and then claimed he
just reprinted what Fetterman's office sent him. A reporter who did this on behalf of a
Republican senator would be tossed on the street. Stein's job, we're certain, is quite secure.
Washington
Post Stands By Their Fraudulent Trump-Russia Collusion Reporting. In July 2020
documents were released by the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding the Russia collusion
hoax. The second set of documents exposed the outlandish New York Times story that the
Trump team had "repeated contacts with senior Russian intelligence officials." The declassified
documents reveal The New York Times reporting was transparently dishonest and attempted to
fuel the Russiagate narrative in its early stages. In May 2022, the country learned that it
was Hillary Clinton's campaign that was behind the entire Trump-Russia collusion hoax. We
know this because her former campaign manager Robbie Mook said so under oath during the Sussman trial.
Washington
Post Editors Deny Border Surge. The editors of Jeff Bezos' Washington Post are
claiming the White House has gotten southern migration under control, with a wide front-page
headline saying "At the border, a reset but no surge." The May 13, editor-placed, five-column
headline hides the reality of President Joe Biden's surge of 83,000 migrants in one week —
and it also distracts readers from Biden's radical decision to ignore Congress while his deputies
extract millions of consumers, renters, and workers from poor foreign countries for resettlement
in Americans' neighborhoods, schools, and workplaces.
Washington
Post Rushes to Call Texas Mall Shooter a White Supremacist, Shoots Itself in the Foot.
As the news flashed about the horrific shooting that took place in Allen, Texas on Saturday, the
Washington Post rushed out an early report on the incident. Although they had sketchy details
regarding the shooter and what took place, one thing the paper was confident in reporting: the
likelihood of the shooter being a white supremacist. There appear to be too many things aligned
to resist running forward with a narrative on this event: an AR-15 is said to have been used,
the shooting took place in Texas, and the gun control messaging was all set to go. Finding out
the killer was possibly also from a hate group would be just the icing the paper needed on this
four-layer outrage dessert.
Rather
Than Smearing Justices, Democrats Should Be Asking Them For Ethics Lessons. The
concerted effort by the media and Democrats to delegitimize the Supreme Court is the most
consequential attack on our institutions in memory. Make no mistake. Today's "Supreme
Court Ethics Reform" hearing is meant to discredit the high court and slander justices with
innuendo. Nothing else. Democrats are angry because the court happens to occasionally
uphold basic constitutional principles of American governance. Democrats are nervous that
originalist justices are going to weaken the administrative state or hand power back to localities
or protect religious liberty or gun rights. The recent hit pieces on Justices Clarence Thomas
and Neil Gorsuch were shoddy and transparently partisan. They did not uncover any conflict of
interest nor corruption. They exist to give politicians fodder and hackish outlets like The
Washington Post the freedom to contend that the Senate is "consider[ing] strengthening ethics rules
for the Supreme Court in response to a cascade of revelations about unreported lavish travel and
real estate deals." Most Post readers will, no doubt, be unaware that there has been no
"unreported" lavish travel or real estate deals.
Washington
Post covers up the role of bureaucrats in making the pandemic worse. In The Daily
202: The pandemic made the loneliness crisis worse, Washington Post writer Oliver Knox ("with
research by Caroline Anders") claims that the pandemic caused loneliness to worsen. But
loneliness was not caused by the pandemic. It was caused by dictatorial edicts from
government officials. No matter how many lies or evasions Fauci and CDC made up, most of the
media went along. People were told they would kill people if they gathered together.
Churches were closed and fined if they refused to comply with the bureaucrats' edicts. The
CDC, unions, and other Democrats colluded to keep kids out of schools and sports. If
Republicans opened schools, the media and other Democrats said they were intentionally killing
people. How many federal workers and others are still working remotely? It surely isn't
because of COVID. Why did it take so long for Biden to lift the vaccine mandate? It surely
isn't because of science. Now, Fauci, Weingarten and others are trying to rewrite history and
say they didn't want things closed.
Government-Endorsed
Corporate Media Gives Award to Dishonest WaPo Hack for "Capturing the Spirit of Joe Biden".
Last night the government-endorsed corporate media gave an award to WaPo hack Matt Viser for his dishonest
portrayals of Joe Biden. Matt Viser was awarded for his reporting on Joe Biden that did not include
ONE MENTION of his obvious dementia, his myriads of known criminal actions and canoodling with dictators,
lying about his son's laptop to the American public during a major election, disowning his grand-child, and
his serial groping of women and children. It takes some real talent to be THAT dishonest!
Washington
Post Is Blatantly Biased In Naming 'Worst Federal Judge'. Matthew Kacsmaryk —
sole federal judge in the Amarillo division of the Northern District of Texas and recently responsible
for invalidating the Food and Drug Administration's 23-year-old approval of the abortion drug
mifepristone — is "the worst federal judge in America," recently declared Washington Post
columnist Ruth Marcus, who covers the Supreme Court. Kacsmaryk is worthy of the moniker, opines
Marcus, "not simply for the poor quality of his judicial reasoning," but for "the loaded content of his
rhetoric," which is not impartial, but that of a "zealot." Marcus' charge is rhetorical bombast at its
worst, but on what does she base it? Her own ideological zealotry and blatant bias, ironically enough.
Four
Pinocchios for Glenn Kessler. Following a spate of scandals in the 1980s typified by
the Washington Post's Janet Cooke inventing an eight-year-old heroin addict and winning a
Pulitzer for her tear-jerking profile of this nonexistent person, newspapers created their own
in-house hall monitors in the form of ombudsman and public editors who responded in print to reader
complaints about journalistic mistakes. Their presence in a newspaper's pages was intended to
encourage skeptical readers to believe they could trust the institutions that published them.
After all, who could doubt the integrity of media organizations willing to subject themselves to
harsh scrutiny by one of their own employees? Few of these monitors remain today, the victims
of budget cuts and a changing media landscape.
Why
No One Should Ever Listen to Max Boot. Changing one's views in politics is hardly a
cause for dismissal. People do get "older and wiser." People do have enough sense —
despite spitting and fuming on TV as Boot often does — to recognize when the hammer isn't
working anymore. We often congratulate those who change, but when someone who was so wrong, for
so long, changes so as to remain a relevant fixture, the change comes off as hollow and self-motivated.
Not to mention describing his eureka moment of change also coming with deliberate lies and misrepresentations.
Shock!
WaPo lied about Elon Musk. I know, I know. It's not a shock. If the Washington Post is lying
it must be a day ending in -day. The latest example is a report that I immediately knew was false but had no
evidence to back that judgment up so I let it pass. It was a claim that went around Twitter and then into the MSM
that Elon Musk had a fit at Twitter headquarters and forced engineers to rewrite the algorithm to ensure his tweets
always were the first users could see. It was a ridiculous claim, but in today's hyper-partisan environment, it
spread like wildfire. Or rather, like any MSM-backed misinformation. [Tweet] The Washington Post
devoted prime real estate and TWO reporters to the story, clearly investing significant resources to spread the
rumor. The Jeff Bezos-owned propaganda outlet — quite the irony there — couldn't let the
opportunity to dunk on Musk escape, even if they had to ignore facts. With two reporters you think they could
bother to actually investigate the claim. But no. That would be reporting, not spreading a convenient narrative.
Now
the WaPo 'factchecker' is rationalizing the letter from 51 lying intelligence officials. The Republicans
in the House are having an investigation into the collusion of the media, Justice Department, and Intelligence officials
as they censored the true story of the Biden family corruption right before the 2020 election. This was pure
election interference to mislead the public. Now, Glenn Kessler, the designated fact checker at the WaPo, is
claiming that the intelligence officials who lied about Russian disinformation were very careful in their wording of the
letter but the media either misinterpreted or misused the letter. That is a load of garbage.
WaPo
[is] Humiliated After [an] Apparent Hatchet Job on [a] Hispanic GOP Rep [ia] Exposed for World to See. The
Washington Post is being accused of racism by a Hispanic lawmaker from Florida. Republican Rep. Anna Paulina
Luna of Florida said its recent profile on her was riddled with errors, according to Fox News. "It's awful how [The
Washington Post] treat[s] minorities. And the fact is, is that their undertone of their article was incredibly
racist. They tried to undercut my Hispanic heritage. They even spoke to my mother and did report a lot of
what she was posting. So, The Washington Post is compost, and they should do better," she said during a Friday
appearance on the Fox News show "Jesse Watters Primetime."
Rep.
Anna Paulina Luna Blasts Fake News Media for False Reporting — Threatens Legal Action.
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) said Friday that the Washington Post wrote a smear job on her with several
mischaracterizations, and baseless and inaccurate information, including the claim that she only embraced her Hispanic
background in order to seek office. This report was then shared by mainstream media. "As I've said before,
and as the Washington Post has clearly showcased, anyone who is a conservative minority is a threat to Leftist control,"
Luna told Fox News Digital. "They can try to discredit me, but unfortunately for them the facts completely blow
their story out of the water." The far-left WaPo published a story on Friday attacking her with the headline "The
making of Anna Paulina Luna."
The
Takedown of Anna Paulina Luna Is Not Going as Planned. Since the legacy media is running out of fodder on
NY Rep. George Santos, The Washington Post decided it needed to set its investigative sites on the freshman
representative from Florida, Anna Paulina Luna. Luna has been making her mark among the newly-minted GOP
House. Luna was one of the gang of 20 who held House Speaker McCarthy's feet to the fire on the Rules package in
order for him to secure her vote for his speakership. Luna is causing her Democrat colleagues to clutch their
pearls over her 2A stance and asserting her right to carry her firearm within the meeting chambers. Luna
publicly joined Reps. Andrew Clyde and George Santos in wearing an AR-15 lapel pin to show her support of
2A rights, and she is cutting a swath on the House Oversight Committee with her targeted grilling of those
testifying on the floor. The WaPo hit piece is the usual drivel of anonymous sources, interviews with associates
that are supposedly dear friends, distant cousins, and hair-splitting hyperbole to make Luna's story and background as
questionable as possible.
The real state of the union.
The Washington Post reported, "Americans not feeling impact of Biden agenda, Post-ABC poll finds." Of course, they
are feeling the impact of his agenda. Inflation remains at 1970s levels, we humiliated ourselves by surrendering
Afghanistan, and we are depleting our military to protect Ukraine's border while ignoring our own. According to
the story, "62% of Americans think Biden has accomplished not very much or little or nothing during his presidency,
while 36% say he has accomplished a great deal or a good amount." What WaPo — a house organ for the
deep state — measured was the popularity of what he has accomplished. Not much of it is good.
ABC's report on the very same poll began, "Four in 10 Americans say they've gotten worse off financially since Joe Biden
became president, the most in ABC News/Washington Post polls dating back 37 years." That is quite an
accomplishment. He set a record by ruining the finances of 41% of Americans.
It
is no wonder the media has lost the trust of the people. Most journalists have been pushing an agenda for
a long time instead of reporting objectively or based on facts. This includes news and opinion journalists.
Now, we see a Washington Post article saying that the media can regain the trust of the people even if they
intentionally are not objective. But if the media are pushing ideas on social policies and political activity,
they are propagandists, not journalists. They are seeking to indoctrinate instead of educate their readers.
Washington
Post editorial board: Migrants are gaming the asylum system. In this case the news isn't the message it's
the messenger. You don't hear a leading newspaper state the obvious about the immigration crisis every day,
certainly not like this. [...] I could fault the Post for a few things here. First, the system isn't "evolving"
into this, it has already evolved. It started evolving years ago during the Trump administration and for the past
two years it has simply been growing at a tremendous rate as more and more people looking for a better life realize the
back door of a bogus asylum claim is always open. But why criticize when there's so much here that doesn't usually
wind up in a paper like the [P]ost, i.e. the fact that this parallel system is a magnet drawing people in and the fact
that people with weak cases get what they want regardless of the procedural outcome because no one ever makes them
leave. Maybe if this sort of information was included in every story on this topic, Americans would begin to
understand what is happening and why.
To
The Left, Racism Is Like The Matrix. On Monday, the Washington Post sent an update to its email
subscribers with the subject line: "The police officers charged with the murder of Tyre Nichols are black. Does it
matter?" The short answer is: Yes, but only to race hustlers on the left. Which is why the Post enlisted
three reporters who spent nearly 1,400 words twisting themselves into pretzels to explain how black police officers
beating a black man to death was further proof of "systemic racism."
Most
reporters are shills for Democrats and the latest string of news proves it. [Scroll down] Then
we get the entire editorial board at the WaPo saying how great White House medical advisor, and consumate health care
bureaucrat. Anthony Fauci has been. [...] They clearly don't care how much he got wrong. First, he said
COVID wouldn't be a problem in the U.S. Then he said, don't wear masks before he told us we must wear masks.
The CDC and Fauci also lied that the virus would easily spread off surfaces, made up the six foot social distancing
standards based on nothing and forced millions to waste millions on worthless plexiglass barriers. Fauci and
others also discouraged an investigation of the Wuhan lab, calling it a disproven conspiracy. That was an
intentional lie. The damage to the economy and children based on dictatorial edicts was massive. How many
deaths were caused because of suicide or failure to get screenings because of the dictatorial edicts? Why would
the WaPo or anyone else tout Fauci's success when he got so much wrong, caused so much damage, and can't seem to recall
much of what he did?
Washington
Post discovers that there was slavery in the US. The Washington Post is apparently in the midst of a
year-long investigation into the relationship between the US Congress and slavery. Who knew? I certainly
didn't, because I generally don't look to newspapers to explain American history to me. The last time one tried to
do so we got the 1619 Project, which is reviled by everybody but Robin DiAngelo and Ibram X Kendi. As for
historians, everybody from Left to Right thinks the project was bunk. The Washington Post, being less ambitious
than the NYT, is giving us a dime-store version of the 1619 Project which relies more on innuendo than outright
falsehoods to slander America's Founding. The first piece in the project revealed that there were slaveholders in
Congress, breaking news that had been suppressed for centuries.
Washington
Post Scrubs Inaccurate 'Conservative' Label of Matt Taibbi, Bari Weiss From Article After Backlash. The
Washington Post quietly scrubbed the word "conservative" from its description of the center-left reporters behind the
viral "Twitter Files" after being called out for the inaccurate wording. Twitter CEO Elon Musk gave independent
journalists Matt Taibbi and Bari Weiss access to Twitter's internal documents, allowing them to expose the company's
rationale for shadow banning conservative users, censoring the Hunter Biden laptop story and deplatforming of former
President Trump. Both of Taibbi and Weiss are well-known left of center journalists, as Fox News noted.
Washington
Post Joins List of News Companies in Economic Straits After Denying a Bad Economy. On Thursday, close to
1,100 New York Times workers staged a strike, of sorts. The effort appears rather neutered considering it was only
a 24-hour walkout, and the desperation was evident as they attempted to get readers to also join in by not consuming any
Times content for the day. (Their position was further weakened as they realized the biggest challenge in this
attempt was not concerning their work but in getting people to stop playing Wordle!) This barely recognized
quit-snit was possibly met with shrugs based on one of the core complaints from this block of journalist guild
workers. They have been bargaining for wages that "keep up with inflation," stipulating that they have been
particularly impacted by this while working in New York. This is rather grating to see, as the press has been
actively trying to sell the general public on the notion that our economy is not as bad as it is perceived, done in
order to shield Joe Biden from responsibility.
WaPo
analysis: nobody should care that we covered up the Hunter Biden laptop. The Washington Post has a
retrospective analysis that gets them off the hook for covering up the news: it wouldn't have made a difference in the
2020 election anyway. There's a new spin on things from a journalist. Hey, let me assert the unknowable is
true so I can explain why it was OK for me to lie to you to avoid what wouldn't have happened anyway.
The
Washington Post's Reporting Can't Be Trusted. After the highly politicized raid on President Trump's
personal residence at Mar-a-Lago by the Biden Department of Justice, Fake News Media kicked into high gear to justify
it. Chief among the legacy media culprits is The Washington Post. [...] The Washington Post reports on the
Mar-a-Lago raid bear the hallmarks of fake news. The stories rely solely on anonymous sources. The paper
provides no facts whatsoever tending to show that the anonymous sources are well placed enough to know what they are
talking about. The claims made in the articles cannot be otherwise verified. Essentially, the paper asks
readers to trust its reporting about these sensitive matters. But can The Post's reporting be trusted? A review
of a few of The Post's other anonymously sourced articles relating to President Trump confirms that the answer is no.
WaPo: hide
the evidence. Democracy Dies from Knowledge™. Spread the Darkness™. The Truth
Hurts™. Pick a slogan. Philip Bump of the Washington Post argues that releasing the video from the Paul
Pelosi break in/assault would only fuel conspiracy theories. Best to stick to the official Narrative™ so
that we plebs don't get any uppity ideas that we aren't being told the truth. He actually, truly, 100% no kidding
is arguing that the evidence should be hidden, as any great reporter would. In other news, Bump argues that
Jeffrey Epstein killed himself, there were no actual human trafficking victims in the crimes for which Ghislain Maxwell
was convicted, and the tooth fairy really does leave money behind if you put your tooth under the pillow.
The Dope on Depape.
Paul Pelosi, the husband of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, was attacked by a man with a hammer at the couple's home in San
Francisco early Friday morning. CNN has strung a series of reports on the attack here. CNN's first report of
the assault was posted at 11:08 a.m. on October 28. By 2:25 p.m. Gavin Newsom had attributed the
attack to "divisive and hateful rhetoric." By 7:25 p.m. President Biden had observed that assaulter's query —
"Where's Nancy?" — was the same one used during the Jan. 6 "insurrection" at the Capitol. Defamation
dies in darkness. The Washington Post therefore assigned three reporters to the case. By 7:00 a.m. on
October 29 the Post had nailed it down: "Attack on Nancy Pelosi's husband follows years of GOP demonizing her."
The subhead was equally unsubtle: "A man with right-wing views who broke into the House speaker's home yelled 'Where is
Nancy?' before assaulting Paul Pelosi with a hammer, police say." The Post must have capitalized "Where is Nancy" to
indicate it's part of the right-wing code.
Lying Liars Gonna Lie.
A favorite saying of mine, statistics never lie but liars use statistics. [...] In 2021 blacks committed around 335,000
violent crimes that we know of, and that is almost 7,000 more violent crimes than Whites even though there are
204 million Whites in America as of 2020 and only 41 million blacks. As I have demonstrated before, it is reasonable
to assume that a majority of unknown offenders are also black. [...] While Whites committed 36,716 rapes and blacks
"only" 16,008 reported rapes in 2018, looking at the victim side tells us something interesting. Whites are 60% of
known rapists (11% are unknown) but White women are 74% of rape victims, while blacks are 26% of known rapists, double
their representation of the population as a whole, but black women are only 18% of rape victims. To put it another
way, 8000 more White women were raped 2018 than White men commited rape and black men commit 5000 more rapes than there
are black women raped. Add in the gap of 3000 unknown rapists and it is quite possible that of the 16,000 rapes
committed by black men in 2018, nearly half of them were rapes of White women. Maybe that is another of those old
stereotypes based in facts? Like most violent crime, interracial rape is almost exclusively black on White, in
fact White men raping black women is so rare that it doesn't even really register statistically.
US
media do Somalians a disservice by blaming climate change for famine. Ishaan Tharoor, a foreign affairs
columnist at the Washington Post, didn't mince words about a looming famine in Somalia. "Ordinary Somalis ...
have contributed little to the emissions that are warming the planet. But they are on the front lines of the
catastrophic climatic events scientists believe will only grow more common in the years to come." On cue, National
Public Radio picked up the story, allowing the author to expound unchallenged on "the connection between the hunger
crisis, the war in Ukraine and climate change." If the media really want to "follow the science," however, they got
cause and effect wrong. Certainly, the Horn of Africa does face drought and famine in Somalia. It may be a
bit of an exaggeration to blame climate change, though, given the cyclical nature of drought in the Horn. When
scientists voice hypotheses, they seek to prove them by isolating variables to rule out any other explanation.
Here is the problem: Suggesting emissions cause climate change, which in turn explains famine, may conform with
journalists' politics — but not with science.
Lawsuit filed:
RW Malone vs. WP Company, LLC. Over the last year, I have been defamed,
slandered and censored. My words taken out of context and weaponized in attempts to discredit
me. A concerted effort was made to write me out of history and deny my intellectual and
scientific contributions. [One] of the most egregious offenders has been the Washington Post.
Exploding
the Watergate Myth. [Scroll down] All the President's Men was a splendid work of American
cinema — and it was about what we've all been told ever since was the most splendid chapter in American
journalistic history, a textbook case of dogged footwork and moral integrity that lifted the [Washington] Post into
the front rank of American newspapers, gave Woodstein (the Post's in-house nickname for Bob and Carl) an Olympian
status that they still enjoy to this day, made journalists as a class more important and influential than ever, and ushered
in a new era of aggressive and ambitious — yet far more respected — investigative reporting about
politicians. But what ever happened to that earthshaking revelation about covert operations by "the entire U.S.
intelligence community"? In the nearly half-century since Watergate, we've never heard another word about it. Not
from the Post, anyway. There was always another big question about Watergate: why would the Nixon White House
have wanted to burglarize Democratic headquarters in the first place?
Mainstream
media urging voters to ignore inflation, focus on imperiled democracy. Recent surveys have consistently shown
that runaway inflation is the most troubling issue to most Americans. This has led many talking heads and media outlets
to express deep concern that historically high gas prices and generally rampant inflation might lead to significant Democrat
losses in the upcoming midterm elections. The horror! To help prevent this, Washington Post columnist Catherine
Rampell, for example, informed her readers that it was a "wild fantasy" to believe that the GOP could lower gas prices.
Furthermore, in a Sunday opinion piece, she condescendingly warned voters to "think carefully about what they'll get if they
cast their ballot based on gas prices." By that she means evil Republicans who are pro-life and pro-Bill of Rights.
Rampell added, "The president does not have some super-secret special dial on his desk that can adjust gas prices, but many
voters believe otherwise." Yes, Catherine, I'm sure many voters think Biden has a "dial" on his desk that can adjust
gas prices in real time. (Not that he'd know how to use it if he did.) In reality, most voters know that Biden
killed the Keystone Pipeline on Day One, has rescinded or denied drilling leases, and has made it clear he is an implacable
foe of the fossil fuel industry in every shape and form. That is why gas prices have skyrocketed since he took
office, and that is why voters are rightfully angry.
The
Washington Post attempts to whitewash the murder plot against Justice Kavanaugh. A few days back, the
Washington Post carried an op-ed by Ruth Marcus regarding the gunman who was apprehended outside Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh's
home. The piece began well, condemning the assassination plot as 'horrifying and intolerable'. It also demanded
that there be adequate security for that the justices, their families, and staff. [...] The piece then pivots to the standard
spinning, deceiving, and whataboutery that the WaPo is known for. The piece urges its readers not to "assign blame or
hijack the episode to reinforce preexisting conclusions" and that "deranged individuals do deranged things" which is true "at
both ends of the political spectrum". When the Democrats commit an egregious mistake, propagandists frequently attempt
to dilute the impact by applying the 'both sides' argument. The piece proceeds to indulge in a bit of monkey balancing,
you can almost sense the effort here.
Taylor
Lorenz, WaPo Blasted for Repeated Unacknowledged Errors in Reporting. Taylor Lorenz, the establishment media
journalist known for doxing teenagers and anonymous meme accounts and literally crying because of the ensuing backlash, is
under fire for repeated errors in reporting which she refuses to acknowledge. The Washington Post, which
published Lorenz's shoddy reporting, is also under attack by Oculus VR founder Palmer Luckey for publishing and then deleting
false claims about him. According to Luckey, the Washington Post falsely claimed he funneled political
contributions through "shell companies," only to later delete the allegation with no disclosure.
It
takes someone in the tank, if not brain-dead, to call this a 'Goldilocks econony'. Because of a decent jobs
report and a lot of job openings, Catherine Rampell, a de facto Democrat campaign worker at the Washington Post posing
as a journalist, believes we are close to a "Goldilocks economy" (not too hot, not too cold, as is said in the markets) when
most of us know the economy is pretty [...] cold. Rampell also says that the consumer is in great shape, but many
economic statistics show that is not true. [...] Inflation is over 8%, a 40 year high, while after-tax earnings are going up
around half that level. For consumers, that's losing ground. Crude oil is up over 200% from under $40 per barrel
to around $120 today since the day Biden was elected. That is what you get when one of the main Democrat policies is to
destroy the fossil fuel industry. They certainly don't care about the massive harm to the poor, middle class, and small
businesses. The retail gas price was around $2.20 when Biden was elected. and is around $5 today, up around 130%.
The inflation rate for the poor and middle class is clearly much higher than 8% when one of their major necessities is up
130% in 19 months.
Biden's
'Ministry of Truth' paused, Nina Jankowicz resigns; Wa-Po's Lorenz blames 'right-wing attacks'. Denying any
partisan motivations behind the rollout of the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) Disinformation Governance
Board — while President Joe Biden and Democrats actively challenge the right to free speech — the
dubiously nicknamed "Ministry of Truth" has been put on pause after expressed concern, leaving the door wide open for further
ridicule. The Washington Post entered a meta state of irony Tuesday when they reported that the board would be shutting
down faster than CNN+. In an article titled, "How the Biden administration let right-wing attacks derail its disinformation
efforts," anti-doxing doxer and woebegone victim Taylor Lorenz attempted to pin the immense backlash as "coordinated online
attacks." As she has so expertly done for herself, Lorenz painted the would-be chair Nina Jankowicz as a hapless target
caught in the crosshairs of right-wing hate as she hyped up the claims of DHS Secretary Mayorkas, who labeled Jankowicz as
"eminently qualified."
Washington
Post Op-Ed: Ending Roe v. Wade 'About Protecting Whiteness'. A Washington Post op-ed from Brian
Boome claims the Supreme Court and the pro-life movement as a whole want to eliminate abortion to "protect whiteness."
Reflecting on the horrible supermarket shooting in Buffalo, where a professed white supremacist allegedly murdered 10 people
and wounded three others — 11 of the victims were black — Boome repeated the Democrat Party talking
points that Fox News host Tucker Carlson was to blame for allegedly spreading the "white replacement theory."
Fact-Checkers
Don't Always Check Facts. "Fact-Checkers" are often just propagandists with a cute title. In a perfect
world, fact-checkers would check just facts. However, all too often, the anointed arbiters of truth equate opinion as
fact and label rhetoric or even parody as "false." Donald Trump was "fact-checked" by the Washington Post 30,573 times.
[...] Politifact fact-checked Ron DeSantis when he told high school students that they could take their masks off and offered
"They don't do anything." Politifact labeled that statement false. Yes, masks "do something," like a screendoor on a
submarine will, technically "stop" some water, but from a practical standpoint, cloth masks are near to useless.
WaPo's
Professional Doxxer, Who Outed Libs Of TikTok, Just Made Another Outrageous Statement. For most leftists,
particularly those who reside in the echo chamber of the mainstream media and under the protection of Big Tech censorship,
self-awareness has never been a key component of their skill set. The mindset apparently operates something like this:
I'm wonderful, only my opinions matter, all criticisms of me and my work are ill-founded. And for that reason, the ends
justify their means, no matter how reprehensible those means may be. Last week, Washington Post reporter (please,
let's stop calling her a journalist) Taylor Lorenz was the subject of widespread mockery as she was called out for some of the
most outrageous media hypocrisy we've seen in years.
The
Washington Post Lies — claims they did not publish details about Libs of Tik Tok's personal life.
After Taylor Lorenz doxed Libs of Tik Tok in the pages of the Washington Post, that paper released a statement defending the
doxing, and defending Lorenz's journalistic standards. They also lied, claiming that Lorenz had not published the home
address of the Libs of Tik Tok account holder, when in fact, she had. The article was later scrubbed to purge those
details, but they were there when the article was published at 6 am on Tuesday. They wrote that Lorenz, who cried on
MSNBC after getting mean tweets and then blasted MSNBC for interviewing her at all since it led to even more mean tweets, "is
an accomplished journalist." Senior Managing Editor Cameron Barr said that Lorenz's practice of using Antifa-affiliated
accounts to gain information, and showing up at the homes of Libs of Tik Tok's family members, were "reporting methods" that
"comport entirely with The Washington Post's professional standards."
WashPost
Defends Doxxing Libs Of TikTok: 'Comports' With 'Professional Standards'. In a statement penned Tuesday
[4/19/2022], Washington Post senior managing editor Cameron Barr stepped up to defend hypocritical malefactor Taylor
Lorenz after she doxed the owner of the Libs of TikTok Twitter account, including her identity and address, all because she
exposed the lunatics, groomers, and general extremists of the left. And rightfully, there was a great public outcry
against the paper. Laughably calling Lorenz an "accomplished and diligent journalist," Barr said her "reporting methods
comport entirely with The Washington Post's professional standards."
Washington
Post Publishes Straight Up Propaganda Piece Outing 'Libs Of Tik Tok'. Washington Post reporter Taylor Lorenz
exposed the identity behind the "Libs of Tik Tok" Twitter account in an article that widely characterized exposure of
questionable school policy and problematic teacher-student interactions as "anti-LGBT." Rather than grapple with the
issues the account brought to light — some of which resulted in discipline of teachers — Lorenz drew on
interviews from transgender left-wing activists at the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the left-wing organization
Media Matters, who predictably supported the narrative that exposing controversial classroom instruction to the public at
large essentially amounts to bigotry for the transgender and gay community. Absent from Lorenz's article were specifics
that might cut across the reality The Washington Post sought to impart on readers, as well as individuals voicing their
support for the account. The Libs of Tik Tok account rose to prominence by simply reposting crazed gender- and
race-focused rants far left teachers themselves posted on social media.
'Something
is up': Jim Jordan spots major shift in Hunter Biden story. A top House Republican thinks "something is up" as
the federal investigation into Hunter Biden and his financial practices heats up. Rep. Jim Jordan said on Sunday
it "sure seems" the president's son is on his way to being indicted, though the congressman acknowledged he could not say for
certain. He pointed to an upswell in reporting on the authentication of contents on a laptop believed to have belonged
to Hunter Biden, coinciding with a wave of grand jury activity. "You mentioned those two stories from the Washington
Post 10 days ago," the Ohio Republican told host Maria Bartiromo on Fox News. "I understand they were four minutes
apart. One was at 11:00. One was at 11:04. So two eight-page-long stories four minutes apart from the news
organization that said 18 months ago there was no story here, this was Russian disinformation. That tells you
something is up. You don't see the Washington Post do that."
Washington
Post Editorial Board Admits Its Complicity In Covering Up Hunter Biden Laptop Story. Last month, the mainstream
media finally admitted that the contents of Hunter Biden's laptops were accurate after sitting on the story for nearly a year
and a half and discrediting it as 'Russian disinformation.' The Washington Post is allegedly one of the outlets that was
given a copy of Hunter Biden's hard drive roughly a year ago and just chose to 'verify' its contents less than a week
ago. This morning [4/3/2022], the Washington Post released an article saying that the mainstream media's admission that
Hunter Biden's laptop was real is an opportunity for a 'reckoning.'
Why
the Washington Post Cannot 'Correct' Its Trayvon Tribute. On February 26, the Washington Post
commemorated the ten-year anniversary of Trayvon Martin's death with a loving and outrageously dishonest video tribute to the
fallen 17-year-old. Even more troubling, columnist Charles Blow enlisted former president Barack Obama in this
mendacious rewrite of recent history. On Friday morning, March 4, I sent an email to "corrections."
I sent the same email to managing editor Sally Buzbee and several other relevant editors.
Did
The Slaves Or MLK Know Freedom Was Actually A Dog Whistle For White Supremacy? Everything is racist
nowadays. Bike helmets are vestiges of Jim Crow, at least according to the city of Seattle. Who knew? [...] An
article by an over-educated and underwhelming thinker was published in the Washington Post not so long ago. [...] The
Washington Post's content isn't worth the paper it's printed on, and it isn't like it has a great track record. In its
intellectually and morally corrupt defense of the Biden administration, it has published other articles proclaiming the
virtues of steep inflation and admired the prospects of safety and wealth foreign wars could bring us. Aside from the
big words, you could be forgiven for assuming this logic belonged to a five-year-old.
Misinformation
101: A Washington Post hit job in Florida. I'm not blind to the concerns over irresponsible extremists
utilizing social media to spread nonsensical theories that are predicated upon half-truths or outright fabrications. It
happens, it's irresponsible, and it's dangerous. But while you'll never get any argument from me about the need for
vigilance regarding the perilous murmurs of online conspiracy theories, I will always be far more alarmed by the insidious
misinformation that flows intentionally from the wellspring of major media in this country. [...] For instance, this last
week the Washington Post ran a transparent hit piece on Florida's Republican Governor Ron DeSantis and his state's pending
bill that would prohibit teachers from proselytizing the new religion of gender and sexual orientation in classes —
things like this: [...]
Washington
Post, New York Times should give back their Pulitzers for Russia-Trump 'reporting'. With the entire Russiagate
affair exposed as a Clinton campaign fabrication, it's the clear duty of The Washington Post and New York Times to give back
the Pulitzers they won for "reporting" the fake news. Clinton campaign cash ordered up the "Steele dossier," with
Democratic operatives providing some of the rumors and a cynical Russian exile asking buddies to supply rank speculation for
the rest. Other Clintonites actually hacked Trump computers, including White House ones after he took office, to create
another smear, as Special Counsel John Durham's latest filing revealed. That's all there ever was: A Team Clinton
scheme to make her e-mail scandal look tame by comparison, and so win the 2016 election, followed by a longer drive to
cripple the new president. It was a true "war on democracy," abetted by the two papers in endless, breathless "reporting."
Washington
Post columnist goes on CNN to claim that president is being treated worse than Trump by press. Three senior
White House officials have embarked on a campaign to persuade newsroom executives to be more favorable in their coverage of
President Joe Biden, according to a report on Tuesday night. The trio — National Economic Council Deputy
Directors David Kamin and Bharat Ramamurti, along with Ports Envoy John Porcari — have been 'briefing major
newsrooms over the past week,' according to CNN's media correspondent, Oliver Darcy. Darcy, in his newsletter, said
that their outreach was sparked by concern that Biden was not being treated fairly.
The Editor says...
If Joe Biden was treated the way Donald Trump was treated in the news media, Hunter Biden's scandals — as documented in his
abandoned laptop computer — would be front-page material every day. So would Joe Biden's obvious senility. And there
still hasn't been any honest discussion of the fraudulent 2020 election. Nor does anyone know who's making Joe Biden's decisions for
him. Why is the Mexican border wide open? Why is the price of gas so much higher than it was a year ago? Why does Joe Biden
spend so much time on vacation, and why does he take so many three-day weekends off-duty? Why hasn't Joe Biden eradicated the
coronavirus, as he promised he would? Does anybody suffer from severe side-effects after getting their so-called "vaccination" for
Covid? Why are booster shots necessary? Why do vaccinated people have to wear masks? Why is Australia turning into a
police state? And Austria And Germany? Why can't Joe Biden answer spontaneous questions from random reporters, rather
than having the questions and answers scripted? Why is it that Joe Biden makes personal appearances so rarely, and even then only
protesters and news media show up? The "mainstream" news media should ask these questions, but they don't.
Washington
Post Columnist Claims Press Is Tougher On Biden Than They Were On Trump. Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank
has hilariously claimed that the media is harder on Joe Biden than they were on Trump. People in media really believe
no one remembers anything that has happened over the last five years. The media was outright hostile to Trump and
everyone in his administration every single day.
Biden's
top aide Ron Klain complains press coverage is too negative. He's the Whine House Chief of Staff.
President Biden's top aide, Ron Klain, took to Twitter Saturday to decry press coverage of his boss. The chief of
staff — known to insiders as the "Prime Minister" for his outsize influence inside the West Wing —
shared an opinion essay from the Washington Post arguing that Biden was receiving worse coverage than former President
Trump. The piece from Post opinion columnist Dana Milbank warned that "My colleagues in the media are serving as
accessories to the murder of democracy."
How the Corporate
Media Launched a Disinformation Campaign to Protect Fauci. By now you've surely heard about Anthony Fauci and
his laboratory beagles, but in case you haven't, it goes like this: For forty years, Fauci, as the head of the National
Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), has funded gruesome experiments on animals. Beagles in particular
are one of the favored species for these experiments, because of their docile and people-pleasing nature, which makes for
less hassle for the humans who subject them to pain and suffering. In one of these NIAID-funded experiments, in
Tunisia, sedated beagles' heads were put into mesh bags with swarms of starved sand flies, who fed on the live dogs.
The other thing you may have heard is that the story is just another right-wing conspiracy theory. You may have heard
this from The Washington Post, from any of a number of self-proclaimed "fact checkers," or maybe even from the
globally renowned Beacon of Honesty David Frum of The Atlantic. I've been reporting on this story for the past
few weeks. In fact, I've been reporting it as closely as anyone, if not more so. It's been an extremely
educational experience for me, but not because I was unfamiliar with the industry of animal experimentation, or NIAID's
leading role within it. What's been educational is seeing up close and first-hand how the mainstream media constructs
and deploys a brazen misinformation campaign.
To Protect Fauci,
The Washington Post is Preparing a Hit Piece on the Group Denouncing Gruesome Dog Experimentations. Anger over
the U.S. Government's gruesome, medically worthless experimentation on adult dogs and puppies has grown rapidly over the last
two months. A truly bipartisan coalition in Congress has emerged to demand more information about these experiments and
denounce the use of taxpayer funds to enable them. On October 24, twenty-four House members — nine Democrats
and fifteen Republicans, led by Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) — wrote a scathing letter to Dr. Anthony Fauci
expressing "grave concerns about reports of costly, cruel, and unnecessary taxpayer-funded experiments on dogs commissioned
by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases." Similar protests came in the Senate from a group led by
Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY). The campaign to end these indescribably cruel, taxpayer-funded experiments on dogs has
been underway for years, long before Dr. Facui became a political lightning rod.
When
did the Babylon Bee start writing headlines for the Washington Post? The headline that appeared at the top of
the following tweet from the Washington Post, about the massacre in Waukesha, Wisconsin, appeared to have been written by the
Babylon Bee. [Tweet] The "tragedy" (not "attack") was CAUSED by the SUV. Forget about blaming Darrell Brooks;
he's a Black man, and therefore cannot be blamed for anything that he does. Apparently the WaPo has such contempt for
African Americans that they have no personal agency. They are merely the accompaniment to the actions of the machines
that they use. The machines are the responsible party. How dehumanizing is that! This vanished tweet is not
some troll making fun of the WaPo. It is real.
Trump
Calls on Pulitzer Prize Board to Rescind Awards to Washington Post, New York Times. Former President Donald
Trump is calling on the Pulitzer Prize Board to rescind awards given in 2018 to the staffs of the New York Times and
the Washington Post for their reporting that fueled the hoax that the Trump campaign had colluded with Russia to win
the 2016 presidential election. [...] Trump added, "For two years, these institutions feverishly pushed one Russia story
after another and — despite lacking any credible evidence — attempted to persuade the public that my
campaign had colluded with the Russian government." He called on the news outlets to voluntarily surrender their awards,
but if not, he expected the board to act.
Jennifer
Rubin, of the WaPo and MSNBC, calls on media to stop treating Republicans as 'normal'. In a very crowded field,
Jennifer Rubin stands out as possibly the most extreme case of Trump Derangement Syndrome among the former conservatives
driven mad (in my opinion) by Donald Trump's presidency. Her hatred of Trump and the party that now is dominated by him
and his supporters is so extreme that she wants the media to stop treating it as a legitimate representative of the roughly
half the populace that votes for it. Yesterday [11/13/2021] on MSNBC, she called for new "rules" that would require the
media to essentially treat Republicans as pariahs. [Video clip]
When
Liberal Media Narratives Blow Up. Today it's Kyle Rittenhouse. Not long ago it was young Nicholas
Sandmann. And, of course, for four years or so it was the Trump-Russia collusion business. What do these three
episodes have in common? That would be the fact of a wildly untrue liberal media narrative. Let's start with the
current case of the 18-year old Rittenhouse. Recall that what launched the case was the police shooting in Kenosha,
Wisconsin of a black man named Jacob Blake in August of 2020. The incident came on the heels of riots around the country
caused by the police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis. The Blake shooting set off a riot in Kenosha, and the
media instantly stirred the pot. A classic example was the reporting of The Washington Post, which said this, as
reported by Fox News: "Blake, who witnesses said had been trying to break up an argument between two women, was unarmed
and shot as he walked back toward his vehicle." The problem? Blake was in fact armed — with a knife.
He was shot when, standing arms-length from a policeman, he began making slashing movements at the cop.
WaPo
walkback: Paper yanks chunks of stories based on discredited Steele dossier. The Washington Post on
Friday took the unusual step of correcting and retracting portions of two articles, published in 2017 and 2019, that relied
on the now-discredited, Trump-bashing Steele dossier. Sally Buzbee, the executive editor for the Washington Post,
revealed the newspaper was unable to stand by the accuracy of their reporting regarding source Sergei Millian —
former president of the Russian-American Chamber of Commerce — noting the recent indictment filed by Special
Counsel John Durham this month.
The
Rewriting of History Begins After Bombshell Steele Dossier Revelations. Over the last two weeks, the Steele
Dossier, which was pushed for years as a credible source of dirt on Donald Trump, has been completely discredited.
While it's been obvious for a long time that the dossier was unverified and full of false conspiracy theories, John Durham's
indictment has given us an eye into exactly how the sausage was made and put the last nail in the coffin. Igor
Danchenko, now indicted for lying multiple times to the FBI, was the chief source for Christopher Steele, but it was a
Hillary Clinton operative who actually fed Danchenko many of the salacious claims. And with those revelations have come
the ritual rewriting of history. The Washington Post has begun to delete parts of past articles that discussed the
Steele Dossier.
New Jersey
Democracy Died in Darkness? At The Washington Post, when Democrats are kicked unceremoniously out of office, it
can only mean one thing: Democracy died in darkness. Take state Sen. Stephen Sweeney, the powerful Democrat
leader of the state Senate in New Jersey. Absolutely no one thought he would lose to a Republican who was a trucker and
had a tiny campaign treasury. Paul Farhi, a veteran media reporter at The Washington Post, diagnosed the problem in a
story headlined, "How the media missed a New Jersey senate candidate's racist social media posts — until he'd
already won." A more accurate headline would be, "How the media failed to help a Democrat win (because no one
thought he would lose)." Farhi insisted Ed Durr "had a history of posting bigoted, misogynistic and derogatory comments
on social media." Like what? None of Durr's tweets were quoted in full by Farhi, and Durr quickly deleted his
Twitter account, so a lot of context is missing.
Critics
slam WaPo column for blaming crisis in Afghanistan on American people. A Washington Post column published Sunday was
slammed by critics for blaming the ongoing crisis in Afghanistan on the American people, rather than the actual perpetrators of the
violence unfolding across the war-torn country. "If you ask me who is to blame, I would point not only to Biden but to former
president Donald Trump — and to all of us, the people of America. By carrying out this pell-mell withdrawal from
Afghanistan, our leaders, after all, were only giving us what we wanted," columnist Max Boot wrote.
War
On Standards, Parking Ticket Edition. The [Washington] Post found that 62 percent of all [parking] fines were
issued in neighborhoods where Blacks make up at least 70 percent of the population. [...] Do the Post's statistics
demonstrate racial bias in enforcement or do they show that Blacks comply less with parking and traffic laws? They
demonstrate neither. However, logic suggests that the latter explanation is more plausible. Take parking tickets,
about which I have some first-hand experience. D.C. meter monitors, most of whom are Black as far as I can tell, have
no incentive to give more tickets to Blacks than to Whites. Neither do their bosses or their bosses' bosses, who are
also Black in most cases. The only incentive these men and women have is to give out as many tickets as possible, so as
to maximize city revenue. As one of the Post's sources, a leading critic of parking and traffic enforcement, says, "their
job is only to bring in revenue." Thus, in all likelihood, they mostly patrol areas where violations tend to occur.
WaPo
Ripped For Gushing Over Biden 'Buy American' Plan After Blasting Trump's as Racist. The Washington Post was
called out on social media for hypocrisy over a report heaping praise on President Joe Biden's "Buy American" initiative
after ripping then-President Donald Trump's very similar program as "dark" and racist. A Washington Post story
published Wednesday offered effusive approval for Biden's new "Make Buy American Real" initiative and his government's
efforts to "bolster U.S. industry." "Biden Proposes Stronger 'Buy American' Rules for Federal Government, Aiming to
Bolster U.S. Industry," noted the headline.
The
WaPo's so-called 'journalism' consists of false attacks on Gov. DeSantis. Although only a small number of
people have officially been declared dead following the condo collapse in Miami, Florida, it appears that as many as 159
people may have died. To any decent person, this is a tragedy. To Hannah Dreier, though, a "national reporter" at
the Washington Post, what happened in Miami is an opportunity to score political points against Governor Ron DeSantis.
[...] Ultimately, as a New York Times article explains, the rescue process is a slow one because, when a building
collapses, moving debris in one place can cause dangerous shifts in another place, endangering both the rescue personnel and
the survivors. That long, slow process — which requires special funding and the reallocation of state and
local resources — is why there are emergency declarations. Dreier, of course, could have known this if she'd
made the slightest effort to investigate. However, at publications such as the Washington Post, if there's
anything that creates an opportunity to attack a Republican, "journalists" don't investigate things. They simply opine
and pretend that they know what they're talking about.
WaPo
Publishes Hit Piece Filled with Lies About Marine Veteran and OAN Reporter — Christina Bobb. Today
[6/18/2021], the Washington Post published another fake news hit piece on the amazing, and highly accomplished reporter,
Christina Bobb from One America News (OAN). They are doing everything in their power to hurt the REAL reporters on the
ground in Arizona who are reporting the truth about this historic audit process in the Grand Canyon State. And, they
are even FLAT-OUT lying!
Whatever
Happened to QAnon? Back in February, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene was stripped of her committee roles,
despite her expression of "regret" for some of her more extreme views. One of the charges against Rep. Greene is
that she has supported QAnon, whose central claim is that there exists an elite whose members exercise political power and
who indulge in promiscuity and other corrupt forms of behavior. In a Washington Post article co-written by Isaac
Stanley-Becker and Rachel Bade, Greene was dismissed as having endorsed the "baseless theory" of QAnon. Stanley-Becker
and Bade devoted most of their article to critiquing QAnon rather than addressing Greene's policies, including her unwavering
support for the police. Yet without evidence to corroborate it, the Post authors rejected the central claim of
QAnon: that a powerful cabal of elitists, some with a history of pedophilia and other corrupt practices, exists within
the Democrat party and the media that support it. Maybe liberal journalists don't know corruption when they see it.
WaPo
'fact-checks' black Senator Tim Scott for not being oppressed enough. The Washington Post's resident fact
checker Glenn Kessler dug into the ancestral background of Senator Tim Scott (R-SC), who has been tapped to give the GOP
response to President Biden's State of the Union address next week. Scott, who is an outspoken conservative, has
written and spoke[n] about his family's background and his ancestors' work in cotton fields and agriculture. For
Kessler, Scott's placement as a Republican contender to Biden's message means that his ancestry is open for debate.
WashPost Redefines
Words to Avoid Calling Biden a Liar. Ashley Parker in the Washington Post, a corporate media outlet owned by
Amazon's Jeff Bezos who receives billions from the government in no-bid contracts, wrote a news article that said President
Biden's claims of 'bipartisan support' for his agenda was true because it included support from Republican voters, even
though there wasn't a single Republican member of the Senate or House who supported his legislation. This is wordplay
meant to avoid calling President Biden a liar, which he clearly is on this matter. And by providing this semantic
defense, Parker is showing her partisan bias.
The
Washington Post Needs To Come Clean About Its Russian Hacking Story Fiasco. On Friday [1/6/2017], the Washington Post
published an earth-shattering report that Russian hackers had infiltrated the U.S. electricity grid through a Vermont utility. [...]
This was huge news, and for good reason. If Russian hackers, or any hackers for that matter, had found their way into the U.S.
electricity grid, there would be almost no end to the harm they could cause. Not surprisingly, the Post story spread like
wildfire. But it turns out that none of it was true.
Biden's border cruelty.
The professional bleeding hearts publicly speak against a border crisis. They moan about the fate of women and
children. But the bleeding hearts planned and executed this crisis. They invited the cruelty by lying about
President Emeritus Donald Trump. The bleeding hearts embraced the human trafficking of women and children, despite the
abuse they face from the people who transport them to the border. Illegal aliens are treated as chattel. We have
known about this for over a decade, and yet liberals and the Washington Establishment support the trafficking of human
beings. Amnesty International said in 2010, "An estimated 6 out of 10 migrant women and girls experience sexual
violence, allegedly prompting some people smugglers to demand that women receive contraceptive injections ahead of the
journey, to avoid them falling pregnant as a result of rape." In 2019, the Washington Post lied and denied that Amnesty
International ever said this. The wall discourages this migration. This administration encourages it. Upon
his installation in the Oval Office, Chairman Xiden illegally stopped construction of the wall, unilaterally ended agreements
with Mexico and other Latin American countries to curb illegal migration, and otherwise aided and abetted this human
trafficking. Liberals obfuscate his role in the surge of illegal aliens, but Xiden opened the gates of the nation.
Washington
Post is slammed for 'social justice guide for toddlers'. Three-month-old babies should be taught about implicit
bias and racial stereotypes, according to a series of experts quoted in The Washington Post. In a much-mocked article
last week, entitled 'Social justice for toddlers', parents were given a list of books, websites, YouTube channels and
companies offering 'woke' material for babies and young children. 'Children develop implicit bias as early as three
months old, and at four years old are categorizing and developing stereotypes,' one expert told author Natalie Jesionka, a
Dalla Lana Global Journalism Fellow at the University of Toronto.
The Editor says...
That's not journalism. That's outright propaganda.
DC
Statehood Is The Next Unicorn The Democrats Are Chasing. The Washington Post is doing an admirable job of
cheerleading for the next unicorn that congressional Democrats are set to pursue, that being DC statehood. The obvious
nature of the power grab that the Democrats are trying to pull off doesn't seem to sway their media enablers in the
slightest. Nor do the historical reasons as to why the District of Columbia wasn't created as a state to begin
with. All that really matters is the opportunity to summon up two more senators from a reliably blue neighborhood, that
is smaller in both physical size and population than your average county. The job for the GOP at this moment, as Yahoo
News reports, is to educate the public about what the Democrats are trying to do and why this scheme shouldn't be allowed to
come to pass.
Washington
Post Accuses Trump Of A Crime Based On Fabricated Quotes. On Jan. 9, The Washington Post published a
bombshell report about what President Trump reportedly said on a phone call to the Georgia elections investigator. The
headline was "'Find the fraud': Trump pressured a Georgia elections investigator in a separate call legal experts say could
amount to obstruction." A few days ago, on March 11, the Post quietly changed the headline and added this
correction to the top of the story: [...] Suffice to say, the original story was impactful. "The president's attempts
to intervene in an ongoing investigation could amount to obstruction of justice or other criminal violations, legal experts
said, though they cautioned a case could be difficult to prove," reported the Post story. The conclusion a
sitting president may have committed a crime is still in the corrected story, even though that conclusion was initially at
least partly based on fabricated quotes. While they didn't directly cite this Post story, Trump's alleged
pressuring of Georgia officials was eventually cited by House Democrats in the impeachment articles against Trump.
Washington
Post writer Erik Wemple laments 'serious lapse' after paper botches Trump quotes. The Washington Post media
critic Erik Wemple penned an opinion piece Tuesday slamming the newspaper's "serious lapse" after it admitted to misquoting
then-President Donald Trump during a January phone call with an investigator in the office of Georgia's secretary of
state. The Post reported in January, based on the account of one anonymous source, that Mr. Trump had instructed
Georgia's lead elections investigator, Frances Watson, to "find the fraud" and that she could become a "national hero" if she
did. The Wall Street Journal's Cameron McWhirter published a recording of the Dec. 23 call last week, revealing that
Mr. Trump never made the statements as quoted by The Post. "If you can get to Fulton, you are going to find things
that are going to be unbelievable — the dishonesty," Mr. Trump said in the call. "Hopefully when the
right answer comes out you'll be praised. I mean, I don't know why, you know they've made it so hard. They will
be praised. People will say, 'Great.' Because that's what it's about. That ability to check and to make it
right. Because everyone knows it's wrong."
Georgia
Deputy Secretary of State Outed as Source of Fake Trump Quotes in Washington Post Story. Back in January, the
Washington Post reported that Trump told an official working in Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger's office to
"find the fraud" in the state, telling them that they would be a national hero if she did. The call took place on
December 23rd, and was just released, proving that Trump never said that. In reality, Trump said that'd be praised
when the "right answer comes out" and encouraged them to examine mail-in ballots in Fulton county. The recording was
discovered in a then-unnamed official's computer trash bin after they said they didn't think a recording existed.
Without their gross incompetence in what appears to be them trying to cover their tracks, this bogus reporting would've never
been exposed. Afterwards, the Washington Post published an epic correction to the story. And despite all this, we
still didn't know who the source of the bogus quote was — until now.
American
Media and Old Soviet Media Are Now Peas in a Pod. This correction in the "news" pages of The Washington Post a
few days ago is simply stunning — and tells you all you need to know about the state of the mainstream media
today: [...] The story, part of the Post's scorched-earth coverage of the former president's activities in the aftermath of
the disputed 2020 election, sought to depict Trump in the worst possible light, while relying entirely on anonymous "sources"
who had a vested interest in destroying the Trump presidency. [...] A better headline for the Post's "correction," of course,
would be "Washington Post irresponsibly publishes false story based on malicious hearsay," but that would be a bridge too far
for the Democratic operatives currently masquerading as journalists at newspapers such as the Post and The New York
Times. In the interest of pursuing their shared political and social objectives, the major media have aligned their
fortunes with the Democrats', and now no longer even pay lip service to the industry's former ideals of impartiality and
fairness.
The
Washington Post confessed to a very big lie. On Monday [3/15/2021], conservatives were outraged when the
Washington Post, in a teeny little paragraph appended to a major story from January, admitted that the core of the
story was a lie based upon false quotations. I find myself surprisingly unmoved. First, this is par for the
course for the modern, Pravda media. Second, as long as there are no consequences, and there never are, it's
irrelevant that the Washington Post behaved in a morally corrupt, fraudulent way. This example of moral
turpitude from the Washington Post began on January 9. [...] The allegations in the article were explosive. Amy
Gardner alleged that, during a telephone call to a Georgia election investigator, President Trump pressured the investigator
to make up fake evidence that would overthrow the results of the election in Georgia.
Wash
Post Concedes It Misquoted Trump's Call With Georgia Official. A controversial December phone call between
then-President Donald Trump and a top Georgia official was initially "misquoted" by The Washington Post and then widely
disseminated before the release of the call's audio last week prompted a major mea culpa. Audio of the approximately
6-minute call between Trump and Frances Watson, the chief investigator of the Georgia Secretary of State's office, was
published by The Wall Street Journal on March 11 and shows Trump never told anyone on the call to "find the fraud," as was
reported at the time. In the recording of the Dec. 23 call, Trump told Watson she had the most important job in the
country at the time and urged her investigators to review signatures going back several years, according to the recording,
the Journal reported.
Recording
Of Georgia Phone Call Shows Multiple News Outlets Ran Fabricated Trump Quote. Multiple news outlets ran a story
with fake quotes attributed to former President Donald Trump, according to a now-released recording of Trump's call with
Frances Watson, the chief investigator of the Georgia secretary of state's office. The Washington Post first reported
the false quotes via an anonymous source in January and said that Trump urged Watson to "find the fraud," adding she'd be a
"national hero." The Post updated its article with a lengthy correction on March 11 after a recording of the phone call
revealed no such quotes from Trump. In the audio, Trump said he won the 2020 election and pushed Watson to look into
ballots in Fulton County, Georgia, as he was convinced there was "dishonesty" going on there. The former president also
told Watson she had "the most important job in the country right now" — not, as The Post claimed, that she'd be a
"national hero" if she found fraud.
Washington
Post: Hey, sorry these headline-grabbing quotes by President Trump were made up. Back in December
President Trump made a call to Georgia's chief elections investigator urging her to look into fraud in Fulton County.
The Washington Post and other outlets reported on the call in early January, highlight two specific quotes from the
call. One quote that appeared in several headlines claimed that President Trump had asked the investigator to "find the
fraud." In addition, some headline quoted Trump as saying the investigator would be a "national hero" if they did find
it. For instance, a Jan 10 story at the Guardian headlined "'Find the fraud': details emerge of another Trump
call to Georgia officials" opened with both claims: [...]
Washington
Post panned for massive correction to Trump-Georgia election story: 'So, they made up quotes'. The Washington
Post made a massive correction Monday [3/15/2021] to a January report about a phone call between then-President Donald Trump
and Georgia elections investigator Frances Watson, admitting it wrongly attributed multiple quotes to Trump based on an
anonymous source. The Post initially reported Trump had told an official working in Georgia Secretary of State Brad
Raffensperger's office to "find the fraud" in the state, which he lost narrowly to Joe Biden, and that she would be a
"national hero" if she did. However, a newly emerged recording of the Dec. 23 call found he didn't use those
words. Instead, Trump said she would be "praised" when the "right answer comes out" and encouraged her to closely
examine mail-in ballots in Fulton County, the heavily blue and most populated county in the state.
Washington
Post Admits Trump's 'Find the Fraud' Quote Was Fake News. The Washington Post has issued a correction to
a January 9 story in which it claimed that then-President Donald Trump had told a Georgia state elections investigator to
"find the fraud." In fact, an audio recording showed Trump said no such thing. The Post's original article was
headlined: "'Find the fraud': Trump pressured a Georgia elections investigator in a separate call legal experts say could
amount to obstruction." It relied on information from a single anonymous source, described as "an individual familiar with
the call who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the conversation."
Washington
Post: Hey, sorry these headline-grabbing quotes by President Trump were made up. Back in December
President Trump made a call to Georgia's chief elections investigator urging her to look into fraud in Fulton County.
The Washington Post and other outlets reported on the call in early January, highlight two specific quotes from the
call. One quote that appeared in several headlines claimed that President Trump had asked the investigator to "find the
fraud." In addition, some headline quoted Trump as saying the investigator would be a "national hero" if they did find
it. For instance, a Jan 10 story at the Guardian headlined "'Find the fraud': details emerge of another Trump
call to Georgia officials" opened with both claims.
The
Many Ways Biden Has Kicked Culture Wars Into Overdrive. The Washington Post on March 7 published a column in
which E.J. Dionne Jr. contended that President Joe Biden is "rolling back the politics of culture wars." If you've read
even a fraction of Biden's executive orders, memoranda, and proclamations, Dionne's assertion will strike you as bizarrely
divorced from reality. If you expected Dionne, a Georgetown professor and Brookings Institution fellow, to address
Biden's unilateral actions and explain how they do not, in fact, advance the culture wars, you would be disappointed.
Dionne doesn't mention a single one.
The
Washington Post Faces Backlash Over Headline Praising Biden: 'Did Joe Biden Write This?'. The Washington Post
faced backlash on Saturday evening over a headline that praised President Joe Biden in response to the Senate passing Biden's
$1.9 trillion coronavirus stimulus package. The headline, which was later featured in a tweet, stated, "Biden stimulus
showers money on Americans, sharply cutting poverty in defining move of presidency." Reaction to the headline was
overwhelmingly negative across the political spectrum with many calling it propaganda.
WaPo
Puts Out Full-On Biden Propaganda Tweet That Just Might Blow Your Mind. The Washington Post did its best to
spin the pork-zilla Biden bill that the Senate passed today that's supposedly for "virus relief" but instead seems a huge
payoff to a lot of Democratic agenda items and buddies. Even by usual mainstream media standards, this was pretty bad,
bordering on North Korea, Communist China kind of propaganda-speak. [Tweet] Are they kidding? Biden "showers
money?" Like the largesse from the King? It's our money, from our tax money. And the only reason many need it is
because government denied people the right to work with their lockdown restrictions. Not to mention that Democrats delayed
the bill for months until it was way past the election to try to hurt President Donald Trump's chances. Indeed Biden
actually passed less relief than did Trump to the American people. Trump already passed $1,800 but apparently that
isn't "showering" because he wasn't a Democrat.
Do Not Let The Washington
Post Raise Your Sons. Washington Post reporter Emma Brown has a new book out. It's called To
Raise a Boy: Classrooms, Locker Rooms, Bedrooms, and the Hidden Struggles of American Boyhood. It's a guide
to raising boys. But Brown knows much more about destroying human males than nurturing them. I know. I was
one of her victims. On September 16, 2018, Brown reported that Christine Blasey Ford, a psychologist in California,
accused Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault. Kavanaugh had been nominated for the Supreme Court and was about to be voted
out of committee. Ford claimed that he had sexually assaulted her in high school in 1982. Ford also alleged that I was
in the room, and that I witnessed everything before jumping in and breaking it up. The whole thing was a set up.
And Brown played a key role in this ugly charade. On the morning of September 16, she broke Ford's story in the
Washington Post. Brown also emailed me to ask about the allegation. But her questions diverged from what was
published in her Washington Post article.
Washington
Post Fact Checkers Called President Trump a Liar to Cover Up Biden's Corruption. [Scroll down] At the
Washington Post, which had declared war on President Trump early on, fact checking became its own industry.
Glenn Kessler, the head of the Post's fact checking team, and two junior members published a book last year titled,
Donald Trump and His Assault on Truth. It was the last hurrah for the team which shut down its presidential fact
checking operation in 2021[.] But Kessler and the Post continued touting its fake database claiming that
President Trump had made "30,573 false or misleading claims" even while making it clear that the game had changed. When
Joe Biden falsely claimed that there was no vaccine when he came into office, Kessler insisted that it was a "verbal stumble,
a typical Biden gaffe", but not false or a lie. Whether it's an apple or a banana, truth or a lie, is a matter of the
media's opinion and agenda.
Elon
Musk Responds To Washington Post Hit Piece: 'Give My Regards To Your Puppet Master'. The Washington Post
published a piece today [2/23/2021] which clearly intends to be a hit piece on Elon Musk and Tesla. The headline gives
a sense of the piece's take: "Elon Musk moved to Texas and embraced celebrity. Can Tesla run on Autopilot?" But
in the very first paragraph, the story undercuts the claim that Tesla is running on autopilot.
WaPo
During Trump: 'Kids In Cages'; WaPo During Biden: 'Migrant Facility For Children'. The once-great Washington
Post is now just another outlet of Newspeak. In an Orwellian twist, the Jeff Bezos-owned paper has morphed "kids in
cages" into "migrant facility for children." Throughout former President Donald Trump's four years in the White House,
the mainstream media, like the Post, repeatedly cited "kids in cages," claiming foreigners entering the U.S. illegally had
their children ruthlessly snatched from them and shoved into cages (it was actually former President Barack Obama who started
the practice). But all that's changed now. "First migrant facility for children opens under Biden," said the Post
headline on Monday [2/22/2021]. But in another twist, the facility was actually opened by the Trump administration.
Cozy!
WashPost 'Fact Checker' Admits They Won't Count Biden's False Claims. Glenn Kessler and his Washington
Post "Fact Checker" squad celebrated their end-of-term count of President Trump's "false and misleading statements" —
30,573. Their level of aggression clearly increased as the term went on, since they announced on January 21, 2019 they
had arrived at 8,158 of those — or 26.7 percent of the four-year total. Shelby Talcott of the Daily Caller put
the Post on the record explaining what we all could expect: there will be no False & Misleading Claims count for
President Biden. [...] But party affiliation matters: there was no False & Misleading Statements count for Barack Obama,
and there wouldn't have been one if Hillary Clinton won in 2016.
Washington
Post caught scrubbing Kamala Harris 'prisoner' story. The Washington Post scrubbed an unflattering anecdote of
Vice President Kamala Harris crassly laughing at the thought of a prisoner begging for a drink of water — then
backtracked Friday after an eagle-eyed reporter took notice. Harris made the comments in a July 2019 Washington Post
profile about her relationship with her sister and trusted aide, Maya Harris, when the former California prosecutor was
running for president. But that story disappeared from the site — with its link redirecting to a newer
version published on Jan. 11, sans anecdote. In the opening of the 2019 piece, Harris described her grueling schedule
on the campaign trail — and the respite she got from SoulCycle sessions and walks on the beach with her husband.
WaPo
Erases Unflattering Anecdote About Harris From 18-Month-Old Story. [Scroll down] One of her big
liabilities with the left during the 2020 primary was her record on criminal justice as attorney general of California.
Mocking starving prisoners, however jokingly, is a reminder of that liability. And now it's gone from the WaPo
archives. Fancy that. Amazingly, WaPo's spokesman admitted to Boehm that the piece had been "repurposed and
updated" but noted that the original piece remained available in print. Okay, but... why isn't it still available in
the Post's archives? They could have kept the original story under its old URL and then created a separate URL for the
updated story. They're owned by Jeff Bezos. They're not wanting for server space. There's no reasonable
conclusion to be drawn except that WaPo deliberately whitewashed the earlier Harris profile because liberals are now invested
in her success as vice president. I'd consider it dubious if they merely added material to an old story without
deleting anything and didn't note that fact somewhere, but to redact information surreptitiously without admitting it is
insanely unethical.
Washington
Post scrubbed unflattering Kamala Harris story from site, restored it after backlash. The Washington Post
removed an unflattering tidbit about Vice President Kamala Harris from a 2019 feature and republished a new version of the
story that is friendlier to the Democratic media darling — but eventually restored a link to the original after
widespread backlash. Reason reporter Eric Boehm noticed the edit and took the Post to task in a scathing breakdown of
the situation. "When The Washington Post published a 2019 campaign trail feature about then-presidential hopeful Kamala
Harris' close relationship with her sister, it opened with a memorable anecdote in which Harris bizarrely compared the rigors
of the campaign trail to... life behind bars. And then proceeded to laugh — at the idea of an inmate begging
for a sip of water," Boehm wrote, calling it "an extremely cringeworthy moment" that painted Harris in a negative light.
Now
the Washington Post Admits Trump Did Not Incite the Capitol Riot. With the second bogus impeachment in the
books, the Washington Post has finally seen fit to admit that President Trump did not incite the storming of the U.S. Capitol
on January 6 with his speech, acknowledging that it was, in fact, planned in advance. The article, published Tuesday
[1/19/2021], the day before Biden's inauguration, declares in its headline "Self-styled militia members planned on storming
the U.S. Capitol days in advance of Jan. 6 attack, court documents say" and opens with the following paragraphs. [...] CNN
acknowledged last week that the storming of the Capitol was planned prior to Trump's speech, reporting that, "Evidence
uncovered so far, including weapons and tactics seen on surveillance video, suggests a level of planning that has led
investigators to believe the attack on the US Capitol was not just a protest that spiraled out of control, a federal law
enforcement official says."
Washington
Post Pushes Extreme Fear Porn Claiming Super Secret FBI Report of Mass QAnon Hordes Planning to Invade Washington
DC. They have to come up with some ridiculous reason to justify their 25,000 military troops in Washington DC
to install JoeBama, but the Qanon invasion is just, well, a little silly. According to the Washington Post, the FBI has
shared super-secret, non-specific, possible-threat assessments to include militant Qanon supporters posing as National Guard
during the inauguration of JoeBama. Abject silliness has now turned to the structurally absurd. Of course the
evidence is anonymous and denied in the middle of the article... but still, pushed by WaPo.
Facebook's
Sandberg deflected blame for Capitol riot, but new evidence shows how platform played role. In the days leading
up to last week's march on the Capitol, supporters of President Trump promoted it extensively on Facebook and Facebook-owned
Instagram and used the services to organize bus trips to Washington. More than 100,000 users posted hashtags affiliated
with the movement prompted by baseless claims of election fraud, including #StopTheSteal and #FightForTrump.
The Editor says...
The copious evidence on this page negates the Washington Post's specious assertion
of "baseless claims of election fraud."
Mark
Levin Debunks Leftist Lie About Conservative Radio Network Instructing Hosts to Stop Talking About Election Fraud.
Conservative pundit and legal scholar Mark Levin pushed back against a Washington Post report on Monday [1/11/2012] claiming that
his syndicator is demanding that its talk radio hosts stop talking about vote fraud in the 2020 election. [...] The memo allegedly
said that Cumulus "will not tolerate any suggestion that the election has not ended. The election has been resolved and
there are no alternate acceptable 'paths.' If you transgress this policy, you can expect to separate from the company
immediately." But Levin, who began warning in September that states were unconstitutionally changing their balloting laws
ahead of the Nov. 3 election date, has also been explaining the constitutional ins and outs of why those changes were
wrong. Also, he questioned whether the memo was actually real, considering he's never seen it nor has he heard of anyone
syndicated by Westwood One getting it, either — which would be par for the course for the Post in the Trump era
(phony Russian dossier, 'Russian collusion,' etc.).
Judge
dismisses Nunes's defamation suit against Washington Post. A federal judge dismissed Rep. Devin Nunes's (R-Calif.)
defamation lawsuit against The Washington Post this week. The dismissal is the latest development in a string of lawsuits Nunes
has filed against major news outlets. Nunes filed the lawsuit in March over a story published in the Post about a conversation
Nunes had with President Trump about an intelligence briefing. [...] The article claimed that when Trump learned of the analysis, he
grew angry at then-acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire. D.C. District Judge Amit Mehta sided with the Post
on Thursday [12/24/2020], writing in his ruling that the newspaper did not act "with 'actual malice,' that is, with 'knowledge that
it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not.'"
If
You Disagree, You're a Rat. Sen. Ron Johnson, among the best qualified and most level-headed of senators,
has been labeled a conspiracy theorist by the media because he questioned the validity of the 2020 vote. We're at the
point where any questioning of the liberal consensus is dismissed out of hand. It's not just that liberals think
they're right — they think no other opinions should be heard. The Washington Post's depiction of dozens of
GOP members as "rats" is a new journalistic low. Reminiscent of Nazi-era depictions of Jews, the cartoon attacks Trump
"collaborators" for the same "crime" as Sen. Johnson — questioning the validity of the 2020 election
returns. Liberals aren't interested in discussing the validity of the 2020 election result. Any conservative
response is labeled racist, irrelevant, or a conspiracy theory and then dismissed without discussion.
What
the Media Didn't Want To Report About These Capital Punishment Cases. This summer, the federal government began
putting people to death for the first time in 17 years. "Trump administration executes Brandon Bernard, plans four more
executions before Biden takes office," said a Washington Post headline last week. While that is technically true, it
wasn't Trump who convicted these men of murder; it was a jury of their peers. It wasn't Trump who upheld their
convictions after numerous appeals; it was the judicial system. It wasn't Trump who found the death penalty
constitutional; here, it was the Supreme Court that reaffirmed the Federal Death Penalty Act of 1994 requires executions to
be carried out "in the manner prescribed by the law of the state in which the sentence is imposed." It wasn't Trump who
sponsored that law in 1994; it was Joe Biden. Reporters nearly always glide past the horrifying specifics, spending
inordinate amounts of space presenting the case of anti-death penalty advocates, who often dishonestly paint these men as victims.
Washington
Post: Denying Election Results Is like Denying Holocaust. In a Washington Post editorial published
Wednesday [12/23/2020], authors Deborah E. Lipstadt and Norman Eisen argue for the radical comparison of challenging recent
election results with denying that a Nazi Holocaust, the "best-documented genocide in the world," ever occurred. The
essay, titled "Denying the Holocaust threatens democracy. So does denying the election results," makes several
comparisons while suggesting how to combat such "denial." Claiming to have "learned the hard way" to take Holocaust
denial seriously, the authors state they have "watched with alarm the birth of another powerful disinformation mythology,"
referring to the "false conviction pushed by Trump and his enablers" that the recent election was "stolen."
Washington
Post Cartoon Borrows Page From Nazi Playbook. In Sunday's Washington Post, a dehumanizing cartoon of Republican
lawmakers and government officials graced both sides of the fold in the opinion section. The giant, tasteless cartoon
by Ann Telnaes shows dozens of rats representing various Republicans who the cartoonist identifies as President Trump's
collaborators. "All the Republican rats" reads the headline, followed by the lead, "All of the state attorney generals
and U.S. Congress members who collaborated with President Trump in his attempt to subvert the Constitution and stay in
office." Telnaes then labels each rat in the cartoon with a Republican's name so that Washington Post readers know who to
hate. The Nazi's used the same propaganda to dehumanize the Jews.
A thread on this viral map, which attempts to paint a
very scary picture. [D]epending on where you live, it is almost certain someone at your Thanksgiving gathering will have COVID.
Look at all that red! But, the map has massive problems. The map comes from the Washington Post, but it is based on the COVID-19 Event
Risk Assessment Planning tool from GA Tech. The goal of which is to show what the chances are of having a COVID positive person attend a
gathering. A worthwhile project. [...] This is the Washington Post map, side by side with the map from the actual data source. Same map,
but Wapo makes the "artistic" choice of making the reds much darker and scarier. [...] The larger problem lies at the bottom of the Wapo map.
It says the map "assumes actual case prevalence is 10 times as high as laboratory-confirmed case count." This, for lack of a better word,
is bonkers.
To
Tell the Truth: NYT and WAPO Deliberately Invalidate Election Tampering Claims. As concerns mount
surrounding election tampering in multiple key states, The New York Times and The Washington Post have all but
ignored credible allegations. In its Wednesday report that Biden "won Michigan," The New York Times emphasized
that Biden's "campaign invested heavily to secure a straightforward path to victory." The Times did note that the
Trump campaign announced that it was taking legal action due to "what it called insufficient transparency." The report
glazed over these concerns, quoting "Mr. Trump's" campaign manager's accusation that "President Trump's campaign has not
been provided with meaningful access to numerous counting locations to observe the opening of ballots and the counting
process, as guaranteed by Michigan law."
I
Did Not Recant!' Postal whistleblower in Pennsylvania disputes claims by media that he recanted. In a confusing
series of events Tuesday [11/10/2020], claims of voter fraud made by a mail carrier in Erie, Pa., were left somewhat
muddied. Postal worker Richard Hopkins alleged that he overheard a postmaster telling staff to backdate ballots mailed
after the Election Day deadline. Amid reports he recanted his allegation, Hopkins appeared on video to double down on
his claims. The Democrat-run House Oversight Committee cited the U.S. Postal Service's Office of the Inspector General
to claim that Hopkins "completely recanted" his allegations. [...] With the media working feverishly to dispel any thoughts
about voter fraud, the Washington Post reported that in addition to recanting his allegations in a sworn affidavit, Hopkins
admitted to postal investigators that he fabricated his claims of voting irregularities. The newspaper cited "three
officials briefed on the investigation" — rest assured these officials are very likely Democrats eager to muddy
the waters amid an election that has been marred by allegations of voter fraud, brought on in part by millions of unsolicited
mail-in ballots flooding battleground states.
Post
Office Whistleblower Denies Recanting Statement Witnessing Ballot Fraud — Demands Washington Post Retract False
Claims. U.S Postal Worker Richard Hopkins came forward to expose specific irregularities with the back-dating
of ballots which he personally witnessed. Several U.S. Senators demanded AG Bill Barr immediately investigate the
claims and sworn affidavit. However the Washington Post ran a story yesterday (has been re-written several times)
claiming Mr. Hopkins recanted his statements. After reading the Washington Post story, whistleblower Richard
Hopkins tells the newspaper their story is false, he did not recant. However, the Washington Post refuses to remove the
story, instead they re-write it several times attempting to retain the falsity.
Washington
Post piece calls on media to report Hunter Biden leaks as foreign disinformation, even if it 'probably' isn't.
An analysis piece in the Washington Post stated journalists should treat the leaked emails allegedly recovered from
Hunter Biden's laptop as a foreign disinformation campaign, even if the claim lacks evidence. "Take a step back, and
the Russian interference of 2016 holds valuable lessons on what to do and what not to do in 2020," wrote Thomas Rid in the
Washington Post under the paper's "Perspective" section. "We must treat the Hunter Biden leaks as if they were a
foreign intelligence operation — even if they probably aren't." "What an incredible admission in the
Washington Post, wow. The hubris it must take to issue journalistic marching orders this contrived in full view
of the public," Daily Caller editor Geoffrey Ingersoll said of the Washington Post's article on Twitter.
'Republicans
Pounce' On Democrats' 'Hypothetical' Plan To Destroy Judicial Branch. "Republicans pounce" is a favorite
framing used by corporate media to spin newsworthy topics they are forced to cover at Democrats' expense. Instead of
reporting the news, the news becomes the fact that Republicans or "conservative media" are reacting to said news. Such
is the case with the consequential news that Joe Biden said he would not share his stance on court packing until after he was
elected, an announcement that sounds more like a hostage situation than a campaign promise. The Washington Post
reported the former vice president's shocking and unprecedented statement with a masterfully spun tweet Thursday, writing,
"Republicans continue attacking Biden, Harris over hypothetical 'court-packing' question."
BLM
Supporter Tied to Michigan Gov. Whitmer Kidnapping Plot — Demands Grow for Her to Apologize to
Trump. Yet another one of the conspirators indicted in the plot to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer
has turned out to be an anarchist and this time is an identified Black Lives Matter [...] supporter. If you're keeping
book, that now means at least three of the six men indicted by the federal government for the frightening conspiracy to
kidnap the governor from her vacation home are avowed anti-Donald Trump anarchists and at least one is a BLM protester.
When half the conspirators rolled up by the feds are anarchists, this is what you might call a pattern. The BLM
connection comes from no less than The Washington Post, which buried the lede of its own story by headlining its
piece, "Accused leader of plot to kidnap Michigan governor was struggling financially, living in basement storage space," as
if living in a basement was the most surprising thing about the conspirator. Indeed, we can be assured that if one of
the conspirators had attended a Trump rally that would have headlined the story.
Both
Are In The Same Church, But Media Love Joe Biden's Faith And Hate Amy Coney Barrett's. The media loves to fawn
over the pious and heartfelt Catholicism of Joe Biden. Now they're talking about the Catholic faith of Amy Coney
Barrett, the frontrunner to be appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court. But you'll notice a very different tone. The
key differences are their adherence to their faith's actual teachings, as well as their political leanings. The
Washington Post can't call Barrett a "devout Catholic" without including in the same sentence that she is "fervently
antiabortion." Meanwhile, Biden touts his Catholicism — despite his support for abortion, which church
teaching expressly calls a "moral evil." The Post also notes that, when Barrett was first nominated to the 7th Circuit
Court of Appeals, "Democrats balked at her nomination, questioning whether the academic could be an impartial arbiter because
of her deep religious convictions." If Biden has deep religious convictions, it has never bothered the Post.
Washington
Post Too Stupid to Tell Difference Between Facts and Predictions. Salvador Rizzo's Washington Post bio
says he has a bachelor's degree in English from Emory University, but somehow he's not smart enough to tell the difference
between a fact, and a prediction. On September 11, this so-called "fact checker" awarded "Four Pinocchios" to this
statement: "Mail-In Ballots will lead to massive electoral fraud and a rigged 2020 Election." —
President Trump, in a tweet, July 2, 2020 This is one of the most annoying dirty tricks of the "fact
checking" trade. Smear your target as a "liar" because you don't like the predictions they're making.
Will
Antifa and Black Lives Matter cancel the Biden-Harris ticket? [Scroll down] A Washington, D.C., college
professor recently confessed to posing as African American. Despite voicing public remorse for her deception and her
voluntary self-cancellation, Washington Post columnist Karen Attiah piled on accusing the now former professor of performing
the ultimate act of White privilege. How this masterpiece of Orwellian illogic got past her editors remains a matter
for conjecture, but Ms. Attiah reflects the prevailing winds of progressive intellectualism.
Washington
Post January 2020: POTUS "Hyping" COVID Panic — September 2020: POTUS "Downplayed" COVID Panic.
After watching political narrative engineering for years, this attempt was predictable. The reason why CTH maintains a
"pinned thread" on the White House COVID-19 response from January and February of 2020 is specifically because we knew the
narrative engineers would attempt to weaponize the politics of the virus later in the election year. We knew the
narrative engineers would flip the script. Today [9/9/2020] they did exactly that.
Washington Post Interviews Clay Travis With An
Incoherent Series Of Tween-Speak Questions. Clay Travis of "Outkick The Coverage" was approached by the
Washington Post to do an interview. The WaPo wanted to do a hit job on him because Clay is a rogue sports journalist
who has angered the mainstream media for being anti-PC, and for mocking the left-wing herd mentality of sports
journalists. In so doing he has built a huge following and a nice little sports empire. Clay acknowledged to his
readers that it was going to be a hit job, so in expectation of the upcoming slander, he recorded the whole interview.
At his own web site, Clay points out that of the 2300 words in the story, exactly 94 were words alleged to have
been spoken by him, but even those included one "quote" that he never said.
Citing
more anonymous former employees, Wa-Po says Postmaster General may have committed election law crimes.
Democrats and their media allies do not appear to have a lot of faith in the party's 2020 nominee, Joe Biden, as they seem to
be laying the groundwork for disputing and/or contesting his eventual fall in November. One such angle has been the
ongoing focus on President Trump allegedly working to undermine the U.S. Postal Service ahead of election day, as spotty as
the claims may be. In what looks to be a furtherance of that campaign, the Washington Post rolled out a story Sunday
[9/6/2020] about U.S. Postmaster General Louis DeJoy allegedly being involved in a straw donor scheme.
When Information
Is Disinformation. While most national media outlets covered the Democratic and Republican National Conventions
over the last two weeks, the Washington Post decided to go to war with a little-known website called Protect My
Vote. While the Post labeled the site and its corresponding advertisements a "disinformation campaign," ironically, the
paper's own news coverage supports the site's message around a key piece of voter education: Your vote is more likely
to be counted when it is cast in person. In an added twist, Protect My Vote directs visitors from every state to their
specific government agencies to register to vote, to request an absentee ballot, or to find their polling place.
Bizarrely, a site underscoring official government resources is now categorized by the Washington Post as disinformation.
A Tyranny Perpetual
and Universal? [Scroll down] The [Washington] Post has always been a liberal rag. But it was
never so brazenly anti-American, so shamelessly dishonest, so unreservedly dedicated to racial grievance-mongering. It
used to be able to call a riot a riot and not resort to ridiculous euphemisms like "mostly peaceful" to describe rampant
street violence. Above all, the Post used to care about its home town. It doesn't anymore. The
District of Columbia, into which I must occasionally (and reluctantly) venture, is a shell of what it was just months
ago. For the span of several weeks, there was a riot roughly every night. Businesses everywhere are now
closed — and not just from COVID-19. Windows everywhere are boarded up. Graffiti, much of if
revolutionary, covers seemingly every square inch of vertical space. The streets are deserted. To the extent that
you see anyone, chances are above 50 percent it's a vagrant. At the few restaurants that remain open, thanks to outdoor
seating, diners are as likely as not to be accosted by bullhorn-wielding anarchists. The town has a post-apocalyptic
feel. The newspaper founded in Washington in 1877 speaks of all this out of three sides of its mouth: none of it is
happening; all the protests are peaceful and justified; it's good that America is finally getting the thrashing she deserves.
Conflict:
WashPost Columnist Gushes for Biden, Discloses Her Son Works for Biden. Washington Post
reporter-turned-columnist Karen Tumulty has a splashy big positive column about Biden campaign manager Jennifer O'Malley
Dillon in the Sunday paper headlined "The woman who transformed Joe Biden's campaign." The pull quote gushed that
"political veterans say the harmony she has fostered with the Democratic National Committee and the party's liberal allies is
smoother than anything seen in decades." [...] This presents a rather obvious conflict of interest when writing about the
Biden campaign. We all want our adult children to have promising careers, but this certainly colors every gushy thing
Tumulty writes about the Biden campaign. Tumulty is married to Los Angeles Times correspondent Paul Richter, and they
have two sons, Nicholas and Jack. Google suggests Nicholas was born in 1992, so he's an "adult son," but I don't yet
know if he's the right Richter. After some biography, Tumulty turned to the big picture, which was very Democratic:
[...]
Six
To One: Washington Post 'Fact Checker' Is Attacking Republicans, Soft on Democrats. Now that the
Democratic ticket has been set and the (virtual) convention is about to launch, it's a good time to evaluate how tilted
The Washington Post "Fact Checker" is when it comes to not just Trump and Biden, but to all Republicans and all
Democrats. To get a sense of the overall tone, I counted up how many "Pinocchios" were awarded to politicians of both
parties. Granted, the Post often spares its marionettes when a politician tries to apologize for his
mistakes. But they often throw the maximum "Four Pinocchios" at the president. Over the summer, it's been a very
tilted time. In June, there were 40 Pinocchios thrown at Republicans, and just 10 for Democrats. In July, it was
even worse: 39 Pinocchios for Republicans, and zero for Democrats. From June 16 through July 31, it was
62 to zero.
The
Washington Post's 'Fact Checker,' Not Pence, Deserves the 4 Lying 'Pinocchios'. Glenn Kessler, the so-called
"fact checker" at The Washington Post, this week called out Vice President Mike Pence's answer to an interview question about
election fraud. But it's Kessler, not Pence, who deserves four "Pinocchios" for many of the misleading claims he makes
about it in his column. Pence said: "Make no mistake about it. The reality of voter fraud is
undeniable. We've seen case after case around the country where there have been prosecutions." Kessler
concentrates on a case in Indiana that the vice president — a former governor of that state — mentioned
in passing, and the dispute is over the timing and exact details. Fraudulent voter registrations were submitted by 12
individuals working for the Indiana Voter Registration Project, which, according to Kessler, was "associated with Patriot
Majority USA."
Antifa
Propagandists: WashPost Praises Violent Portland Rioters' 'Stamina' [and] 'Creativity'. Antifa
sympathizers in the media whitewashed the left-wing group's violence yet again this past weekend, gifting them with a glossy
photo essay in The Washington Post. Reporter Marissa J. Lang tried to soften the radical activists' image by
featuring a family of four, a veteran and "moms" flaunting their ridiculous riot gear along with self-righteous quotes they
gave to the paper. It's hard not to gag when Lang lovingly described how Portland's left-wing "protests" are what
"Portland does best" and are "as natural as the salmon swimming in the Willamette River." Sounding like Antifa's publicist,
she touted the demonstrations have "yielded real results" (such as defunding the police and forcing out federal agents.)
The Post reporter of course downplayed the violent methods as just "vandalism" of course, before cheering on their "stamina
and creativity:" [...]
Washington
Post: It doesn't matter that the most violent cities in America are run by Democrats. Usually, we elect
mayors to do the job of running things and one of the most important parts of their job is public safety. Especially in
cities with higher crime rates, crime reduction is often a major point of discussion during election season. For
instance, Memphis, Tennessee is at the top of the per capita crime list. [...] Why would the fact that the winner is almost
always going to be a Democrat not matter? Don't Democrats tend to have certain specific views about crime, policing,
mass incarceration, etc.? Don't Republicans have a reputation for being tougher on crime, more friendly to police and
prosecutors, etc.? How can this not matter?
An Aristocracy of Losers.
Even by the standards of the Washington Post, Sunday's [5/17/2020] feature on Stacey Abrams was remarkable. And
by "remarkable," of course I mean, ludicrous. The hagiographic profile, which ran to more than 5,000 words,
likened her to "a runway supermodel" and included a silhouette photo of Abrams, enshrouded by machine-made fog, that provoked
widespread derision on social media. Of course, any criticism of Abrams will immediately be denounced by liberals as
racist and sexist, which is the most obvious reason why Abrams has been promoted as a "rising star" of the Democratic
Party. The liberal media enjoy nothing more than denouncing Americans as hate-filled bigots.
Sen
Cruz exposes WaPo's abandonment of journalism. The Washington Post fact checker published a video describes as
"amazing," claiming it was doubtful the Wuhan Virus came from the Wuhan laboratory. After basically showing why it
might have come from the lab, they concluded it's doubtful it came from the lab. They have some red herrings thrown
in. Senator Cruz eviscerated their "amazing" video.
Cruz:
How Did the Washington Post Reach its Conclusion on Wuhan Despite Having All the Facts? China is guilty.
Most admit this. Unless you're the World Health Organization or, it turns out, The Washington Post. We know that
the coronavirus originated in Wuhan, China, and we know that the CCP covered it up for days, letting the virus travel far and
wide and infect millions of people. Thanks to their incompetence and their deadly cover up, thousands of people have
now succumbed to the virus, including 63,000 Americans. More recent evidence suggests that the virus actually escaped
from a Wuhan lab that failed to follow safety protocols. Washington Post's Fact Checker Glenn Kessler knows all this
and shared a video from his colleague admitting as much. Yet, he concluded that it was "doubtful" that the new
coronavirus was accidentally released from a Wuhan lab.
Study:
Washington Post Bashes Trump Virus Response with 25-to-1 Negative Headlines. As the leading newspaper in the
nation's capital, the editors of The Washington Post know much of their influence comes from their ability to set an
agenda for the many powerful political and media people who read it on a daily basis. And the first thing those
powerful readers see every morning are the big headlines on The Post's front page, framing the news the way The
Post's editors want them to see it. In the 100 days since the coronavirus epidemic began to receive significant
news coverage, The Post has used its front page to undermine the administration's response to the unprecedented
crisis, with dozens of headlines flagrantly editorializing against the President and nearly everyone on his team.
Washington
Post's Amber Phillips Spreads Fake News About Cost of Isopropyl Alcohol. On Thursday, the Trump administration
and its medical experts revealed that isopropyl alcohol is quite effective in cleaning surfaces suspected of being infected
with the coronavirus. Within a minute or so, the virus dies. To any sane person interested in saving lives,
offering a little hope, reducing infections, and informing Americans of this important find, this is good news, the kind of
news a morally responsible and humane media would want to share with the public. Unfortunately, as we have learned
since the CNN Race Riots of 2014, we do not have a morally responsible or humane media, rather we have a sociopathic media
willing to destroy countless lives in pursuit of their far-left political agenda.
Don't
Let The Washington Post Get Away With Memory-Holing Its Anti-Kavanaugh Campaign. The Washington Post has a
problem. The newspaper led the massive effort against the nomination of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh by
publishing and relentlessly hyping a completely unsubstantiated allegation of sexual assault against him. Now, the
paper is leading Democrats' efforts to bury a similar, if stronger, allegation of sexual assault against Joe Biden. To
accomplish this dramatic turnabout, the paper is collectively trying to rewrite history, pretending the allegation against
Kavanaugh had more basis than it did while also pretending that the allegation against Biden has less basis than it does.
7
Devastating Revelations About Crossfire Hurricane In New Releases. [#5] FBI Relied Solely on Fake News to
Support Portions of the FISA Applications: The additional FISA application declassifications reveal another
disconcerting fact: The FBI relied completely on media reports that ended up being inaccurate to "assesses that,
following Page's meetings in Russia, Page helped influence [the Republican Party] and Trump's campaign to alter their
platforms to be more sympathetic to Russia." In the FISA applications, the FBI supported this "assessment" with summaries
of the reporting by two "identified news organizations," one a July 2016 article and the second an August 2016 article.
While the FISA applications did not identify the articles, "one was apparently Josh Rogin's Washington Post opinion article,
which reported claims that Trump campaign members 'worked behind the scenes to make sure [the GOP]'s platform would not call
for giving weapons to Ukraine to fight Russian and rebel forces.'"
Another
Dishonest Smear By the Washington Post. Yesterday's [4/13/2020] Washington Post carried an attack on South
Dakota and its governor, Kristi Noem [...] The point of the Post story is to convey the impression that Governor Noem's
reliance on voluntary measures, education, persuasion, and close cooperation with federal agencies, other governors, and the
private sector is a failure. Strikingly absent from the Post's hit job, however, is the bottom line: how many
South Dakotans have actually succumbed to COVID-19? The answer: 6, and none have been reported within the last
week. South Dakota has one of the best coronavirus records of any state, but the Post didn't tell its readers
that. It would have ruined the narrative.
The Washington Post Runs a Shameless
CIA Authored Hit Piece to Blame President Trump for the Spread of Wuhan Virus. On Friday [3/20/2020], the Washington
Post posted a bizarre and counterfactual story that alleges that Wuhan virus spread into the United States because President Trump
ignored warnings from... get this... our intelligence agencies about a pandemic developing in China, a pandemic that was to become
the foreign Chinese Wuhan Kung-Flu bat virus pandemic that has panicked us into shutting down the US economy. The bylines
are Shane Harris, Greg Miller, Josh Dawsey and Ellen Nakashima. All of these will seem familiar from the Russia Hoax stories
that rolled out of the Post like marbles from a bag with holes in it. [...] What these clowns, and by clowns I mean the Eric
Ciaramella squad that is still ensconced in the Intelligence Community and who regularly use their duty position to impress
credulous reporters into writing hit pieces on President Trump, are trying to do is to recreate the smear directed against
President George Bush over 9/11. They use the exact same tactic as they did to blame Bush for 9/11.
WaPo:
Biden Didn't Lie, He 'Described His Stance Inaccurately'. A Washington Post fact-checker ruled Thursday
that Joe Biden hadn't lied when he said he supported a fracking ban during Sunday's Democratic presidential debate.
Rather, Biden had simply "described his fracking stance inaccurately." The Post gave Biden "Zero Pinocchios" for
saying during the most recent Democratic debate that he opposed fracking entirely. Instead, the paper pointed to the
Biden campaign's explanation that the candidate had "misspoken" and that "his position was the same as ever," opposing
fracking only on public lands. Meanwhile, the Post criticized those who quoted Biden's remarks verbatim.
"Critics pounced," the fact-checker wrote. "Republican operatives cut a short video of Biden's remarks, to use as a
cudgel in races against moderate House Democrats. Sanders supporters accused Biden of misleading voters about his
policy, which doesn't ban fracking outright, as Sanders would."
Jennifer
Rubin's death wish for Republicans is factually wrong, and the maps prove it. Once upon a time, Jennifer Rubin
was an intelligent woman. Things started to go downhill when she went to work for the Washington Post, but what really
flipped the switch in her brain was seeing Donald Trump become president. Not only did she lose perspective, but she
also lost intelligence, self-restraint, and decency. Her latest flight of NeverTrump nastiness has her speculate about
possible Republican deaths during a time of coronavirus. Her speculation not only reveals an even further degradation
of mind and soul, but she's got things entirely [...] wrong — and a couple of maps prove it. Maybe the seeds
of Rubin's decay were always there, considering that she attended U.C. Berkeley both as an undergraduate and at law school.
Her downslide might also have come from spending twenty years in Hollywood, working as a Labor and Employment lawyer in Hollywood.
Panic
Never Helped Any Pandemic And Won't Start Now. Invoking the "Black Death," which probably wiped out a third of
Europe, both CNN and the Washington Post have reported that Iran is digging (per the Post) "Coronavirus Burial Pits So Vast
They're Visible From Space." Never mind that Google can read your license plate from space, nor that on average more than
12,000 Iranians die daily and the country has reported less than 80 COVID-19 deaths since virus was detected there a month
ago. For those without enough fingers, that's a 0.02% increase in deaths per day. The cemeteries can handle it.
Washington
Post (CIA) Starts: "Bernie is a Russian Asset" Narrative. The CIA leaks narrative spin to the Washington
Post. The FBI leaks their narrative spin to the New York Times; and the State Dept. primarily uses CNN for the same
purposes. This media distribution model is the one constant in an ever changing universe. Today's Club narrative
was too predictable. Everyone who does not support the DC intel apparatchik immediately becomes a Russian asset.
Now, "according to people familiar with the matter", the Russians are trying to help Bernie Sanders.
Devin
Nunes Suing Washington Post Over 'Garbage' Report. Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) announced Friday night that
he is suing the Washington Post, accusing the paper of publishing "demonstrably false" "garbage" about him. "I don't
know what planet the Washington Post is on but they'll have an opportunity in federal court in the next couple weeks
to explain who their sources are because I'm going to have to take them to court," Nunes told Fox News host Harris
Faulkner. Nunes was appearing on Fox's "The Story" (with Faulkner filling in for Martha MacCallum) to talk about a
recent classified briefing to House intelligence members. As has become expected, information (and disinformation) from
that briefing was promptly leaked to the media.
America's
Opinion Journalists Ranked: The Good, The Bad, and The Worst. E.J. Dionne (Washington Post). If E.J. Dionne
had been employed not by the Post, but by the Democratic National Committee, none of the pieces he has written for years would read even
a little bit differently. The gentleman practices partisan flackery without surcease or distinction.
WaPo's
Rubin Completes Descent Into Self-Parody, Swooning Over Schiff's 'Brilliant' Legal Skills. This all wouldn't be
so awkward if Jennifer Rubin weren't still billing herself as the "conservative blogger" for The Washington
Post. [...] Rubin's journey as a #NeverTrump zealot has been one of the weirder ones to observe these past few
years. Even before being exposed to toxic peer-pressure levels of Coastal Media Trump Derangement Syndrome, Rubin
wasn't really what anyone outside of the northeastern United States could call a "conservative." She was merely
conservative relative to the people around her. While many fauxservative Never Trump types spent most of 2017 and 2018
criticizing the president and celebrating other Republicans who agreed with them, our girl Jen almost immediately donned a
cheerleader skirt and began positively gushing for any Trump-hating lefty she became aware of.
Hillary
Clinton Vindicated On Corruption Charges? Hardly. Last week, the Washington Post reported that the
Justice Department had wound down a Hillary Clinton-related inquiry after finding "nothing of consequence." That set off a
series of Hosannas from the allegedly non-partisan press, which seems to notice quid pro quos only when they involve a
Republican. A quick review of the flagrantly corrupt dealings of the Clinton Foundation is in order. When Hillary
took the job of secretary of state under President Barack Obama, she promised that the foundation wouldn't accept foreign
donations. It took in money from at least seven foreign governments. Documents showed that 85 of the 154 private
interests who met with Clinton at the State Department had donated money to the foundation. Emails unearthed by
Judicial Watch showed that Clinton's top aide, Huma Abedin — who worked for both the State Department and the
foundation — gave "special expedited access to the secretary of state" for those who gave $25,000 to $10 million.
This
Is The Washington Post On Crack. Good thing the media is working to push conservative news sites off social
media. Because we wouldn't want the internet to be dominated by crazy nonsense and lies. Just serious
journalism. Like this. ["]Every American family basically pays an $8,000 'poll tax' under the U.S. health
system, top economists say - Washington Post["] This is the Washington Post. This is the Washington Post on
crack. Does anyone involved in this even know what a poll tax is? Or what a tax is? Or what words mean?
Washington
Post blasted over column urging journalists to 'reach the undecided' on impeachment. The Washington Post is
taking heat over a column urging journalists to "reach the undecided" in the country who have yet to be swayed on the topic
of impeachment. In a piece titled, "Wall-to-wall impeachment coverage is not changing any minds. Here's how
journalists can reach the undecided," Washington Post media columnist Margaret Sullivan argued Thursday [12/5/2019] that "not much
has changed" during the ongoing impeachment inquiry into President Trump in recent weeks despite all the media attention it has
received. "So, is the media coverage pointless? Are journalists merely shouting into the void?" Sullivan asked.
She later cited Columbia University journalism professor Bill Grueskin, who suggested that journalists have a "movie-trailer
approach" to impeachment coverage.
Washington
Post changes history to portray pro-life Americans as 'white supremacists'. Another day, another smear of the
tens of millions of American conservatives by a Left-wing 'establishment' news outlet. Like the rest of the Marxist
mainstream media, the Post is stuck on characterizing Caucasian person to the right of Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin as a
"white supremacist," and since it must be a slow news cycle, the paper found time to assign a reporter to invent a new line
of attack.
Here are the
Most Egregious Fake News Stories of 2018. [#1] The Washington Post blames the Border Patrol for the death of a
7-year-old migrant: The Washington Post published a story in December focusing on a 7-year-old migrant child from
Guatemala who died in border patrol custody. Despite WaPo's misleading headline suggesting border patrol was to blame
for the girl's death, the full timeline of events and statements from the girl's father praising border agents revealed a
different story.
WaPo
Ran Kavanaugh Story With Knowingly False Information. The Washington Post falsely suggested that Georgetown
Preparatory School was hiring a new employee to deal with fallout from the Kavanaugh hearings, despite the school directly
contradicting WaPo's report. Emily Heil reported on October 18 that Georgetown Prep was hiring a director of alumni
relations, and wrote that the school posted the advertisement for the position this week. The article further suggested
that the school was adding the position because of the news surrounding the confirmation of Justice Brett Kavanaugh, a
Georgetown Prep alum, to the Supreme Court. However, Heil was informed prior to publication of her article by a
spokesperson for Georgetown Prep that the position was posted back in July.
The
Destructive Effects Of The Media's Misleading, Racially Charged Headlines. When it comes to race and crime or
even racially charged incidents, not all headlines are created equal. "Woman beats a 91-year-old Mexican man with a
brick, tells him to 'go back to your country,'" read last Monday's [7/9/2018] Washington Post headline about the brutal anti-Hispanic
hate-crime against Rodolfo Rodriguez. Rodriguez had suffered two broken ribs and a broken cheekbone after accidentally
bumping into a child while walking on a sidewalk and being repeatedly attacked by the child's concrete-brick wielding
mother. And if that wasn't enough, the Post reports, several other "young men" came over and kicked the 91-year-old
while he was down. "Go back to your country!" the woman yelled. It has all the tragic hallmarks of a hate crime,
to be sure, except the Washington Post chose not to reveal the race of the perpetrator until the fourth paragraph down,
almost as an afterthought (hint: she was a black woman). And even after she was arrested, the racial identity
of 30-year-old assailant Laquisha Jones remained buried in paragraph four.
WaPo
invents quote, then stalls on correction for Nikki Haley: Any questions as to why people hate the press?
[Scroll down] Turns out it was the United Nations that made the 250,000 quote, not Haley, and the 250,000 was a figure
for extreme poverty, not regular poverty. Neither the 'extreme,' nor the fact that Haley never said it at all, were
gottten right in the original story, quite a two-fer for two reporters to make on the mistake front. And they ran the
bad quote with Haley's picture on their tweet.
Maybe
the left should answer some questions instead of Kavanaugh. Greg Sargent of the Washington Post, Senator Chuck
Schumer, and others on the left are trying to trash President Trump's Supreme Court nominee, Brett Kavanaugh, in as many ways
possible. One of their many lines of attack is that Trump knows that Kavanaugh will let Trump off on any potential
legal problems, presumably from Special Counsel Robert Mueller. The first question that Sargent, Schumer, and other
leftists of this state of mind should be asked is which law Trump broke. What's more, how would some garden-variety
stealing-or-lying charge, whatever it is, somehow make it to the Supreme Court? More to the point, how would that cause
any Supreme Court justice to let him off?
This
Is What a Eulogy for an Establishment Conservative Looks Like. The Washington Post began an obituary for the
late Charles Krauthammer that blamed him for the Iraq War, a bit of a stretch since he's a writer, not a general. They
called him a "neo-conservative provocateur" who helped lead the invasion of Iraq.
The Most Dangerous Aspect
of Obamagate. The party line from the New York Times, the Washington Post, and countless lesser
outlets that parrot their "news" stories is that the memo was both a "nothingburger" and a dangerous attempt to undermine
federal law enforcement agencies. Immediately upon its release the Times published a column titled, "Devin Nunes
Nothingburger." Then, 24 hours later, the Gray Lady published another piece under the headline, "The Memo Doesn't
Vindicate Trump. It's More Proof of Obstruction." The problem here isn't that the fabled "newspaper of record"
would have us accept the proposition that the memo proves nothing while also providing proof that the President is guilty of
obstructing justice. The danger is that the media is largely controlled by people who are so committed to a dead
statist ideology that they are willing to ignore objective facts and contradict themselves on a day-to-day basis in order
to participate in what amounts to a coup attempt against a duly elected President.
The
truth about fatal shootings by police. As it has for the last three years, the Washington Post dedicated a team
of data collectors and writers to focus on the issue of fatal shootings by police, producing a long story earlier this month
headlined: "Nationwide, police shot and killed nearly 1,000 people in 2017." The exact number of such deaths the
Post counted was 987. But rather than supplying any balance or meaningful context to an important topic, the flawed story
takes the reader just where discerning people might expect — to the discredited myth that racist police are
targeting and gunning down unarmed black men and boys for no reason other than the color of their skin.
No,
the Trump Administration Didn't 'Ban' 7 Words at the CDC. Heads exploded over the weekend in response to a
Washington Post article that claimed the Centers for Disease Control would "ban" seven words in all future budget documents
submitted to Congress. The article's inflammatory headline, "CDC gets list of forbidden words: Fetus,
transgender, diversity," set the tone for an egregiously poor example of journalism, even by Washington Post
standards. Science reporter Lena Sun wrote, "the Trump administration is prohibiting officials at the nation's top
public health agency from using a list of seven words or phrases — including 'fetus' and 'transgender' —
in official documents being prepared for next year's budget." Support for that explosive charge came from precisely one
anonymous source, a CDC analyst who attended an agency briefing on December 14 where the word-ban was allegedly discussed.
Another
errant anti-Trump hit piece from the Washington Post. Fresh off of its triumph in the Alabama Senate race, the
Washington Post returns to its primary mission — taking down the President of the United States. [...] The hit
piece, by Greg Miller, Greg Jaffe, and Phillip Rucker, takes up five pages in the front section of today's Post. One
searches in vain through the authors' gossip and distortions for evidence of the article's two themes: (1) that Trump is
leaving the U.S. vulnerable to the Russian threat in question, cyber-attacks on our election process and (2) that Trump's
policies tilt in favor of Russia. In support of its first theme, the Post notes that Trump hasn't formed a task force
to focus on election hacking or convened a Cabinet-level meeting on the subject. From this, it wants us to infer that
little or nothing is being done to make such hacking more difficult. The inference is unreasonable.
Flashback:
WaPo Document Expert Said Forged Roy Moore Yearbook 'Consistent with One Writer'. Three weeks ago, in a
partisan effort to dismiss what is now an admitted forgery, and what at the time was an obvious forgery, the left-wing
Washington Post's Philip Bump consulted former FBI agent Mark Songer, a forensics documents examiner, to examine a
yearbook produced by one of Roy Moore's accusers as evidence he assaulted her. The expert concluded that the "writing
seems consistent with one writer." The context of when Bump published this piece is important. If you recall, the
Washington Post was the news outlet that first broke the story of the Moore allegations, and it was during this time
that outside fact-checking of the Post's reporting revealed serious lapses, all them pointing to a Moore accuser who manufactured
a false narrative. But in a Friday morning [12/8/2017] interview on ABC's Good Morning America, Beverly Young
Nelson admitted that she had forged a portion of what she still claims (with no credibility) is truly Moore's signature.
Why
should we believe the Washington Post? If Roy Moore committed statutory rape, then he does not belong in the
Senate. But I doubt it is true because the story stems from the Washington Post. This publication
lies — repeatedly.
Alabama
ABC Affiliate Can't Find One Voter Who Believes WaPo Report About Roy Moore in Man-on-the-Street Segment.
During a segment that aired on Friday's [11/10/2017] broadcast of Birmingham, AL ABC affiliate WBMA 33/40's 5 p.m. local
news, political reporter Lauren Walsh sought out voters in Columbiana, AL to gauge their reactions to the Washington Post
report that alleged Republican U.S. Senate hopeful Roy Moore engaged in inappropriate conduct with four teenage girls more
than 34 years ago. None of the respondents according to Walsh told her they believed the Post's reporting. "It's
hard to believe the events that transpired yesterday," Gordon Fluker of nearby Wilsonville, AL said to Walsh about the
Washington Post report. Fluker's response was the standard according to Walsh. "Out of all the voters we spoke with
Friday [11/10/2017] in Columbiana, we didn't find one voter who believed the Washington Post report about Moore," she said.
The Truth About One-Sided
DACA Reporting. Over at the Washington Post's Wonkblog, reporter Tracy Jan has a piece entitled, "White
House claims 'dreamers' take jobs away from blacks and Hispanics. Here's the truth." The truth, according to the
immigration advocates interviewed for the article, is that DACA has no undesirable effects whatsoever on the U.S. labor
market. Ms. Jan apparently did not reach out to any immigration skeptics for comment. Had she done so, they
would have told her several things. First, DACA recipients are not a high-skill group. The 15 percent of DACA
recipients over the age of 21 who have a four-year degree is far from the 34 percent among natives in the same age
range. Furthermore, as Alan Tonelson points out, the occupations held by DACA recipients seem to be primarily
working-class. The idea that they are not competing with less-educated natives, as the advocates in the Wonkblog
article claim, is unlikely. Second, although there is certainly not a fixed number of jobs in our economy, immigration
can still negatively affect American workers.
WaPo Fact
Checker Misleads on Huma Abedin & the Muslim Brotherhood: What's the Truth? It is an undisputed fact that
Huma Abedin was an employee of the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs (IMMA) for 12 years, and appeared on the masthead of
the organization's journal, the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs (JMMA) right up until the time she began to work at the State
Department for Secretary Clinton. [...] Whether one finds it plausible that an individual might be listed as an "associate editor"
for a period of 12 years, yet never be called upon to perform the task which their position suggests (i.e. editing) is not
a question of fact. The readers, (Kessler's and ours) will need to determine for themselves whether such an excuse holds
water, but a reasonable person might look upon their own life's experience and wonder whether they ever approached a decade or
longer in a position without even having seen the work ostensibly produced there during their tenure.
Graham:
Comey Didn't Tell Congress the DNC Email That Drove Him to Intervene in Clinton Investigation Was Fake. Sen. Lindsey
Graham (R., S.C.) said Sunday [6/11/2017] that former FBI Director James Comey did not tell lawmakers the email that played a role in his
decision to publicly intervene in the Hillary Clinton email investigation was fake, as the FBI reportedly believed. The Washington
Post reported May 24 on a Russian intelligence document the FBI obtained that purported to show a "tacit understanding between the
Clinton campaign and the Justice Department" over the investigation into Clinton's email server use. The FBI, according to the
report, believed the document was unreliable and possibly fake.
Trump
Maintains Momentum Despite Malicious Media. I was at a conference in Chicago last week when a friend mentioned
that it had just been reported that [Rod] Rosenstein was furious that Trump deployed his memo as the reason to fire Comey and
that he was threatening to quit. Yikes! Except that Rosenstein did not threaten to quit. So why did The
Washington Post report that he did? They just made it up. And they did so out of malice, in an effort to
delegitimize Trump.
The Obama-Bezos-CIA-WaPo Link Coincidentally
Lurking Behind Those Intel Community Leaks. [Scroll down] The rogue officials behind the leaks are from
the Obama administration. You can certainly buy the deduction that they'd know reporters at WaPo, and would, in their
unhappiness, "leak scoop" to them. (Even though it never turns out to actually be anything, other than innuendo.)
But it's really been noticeable that whatever the most sensational claim is, every couple of days or so, it's that claim that
ends up being leaked through the Washington Post.
Tips
For Reading Washington Post Stories About Trump Based On Anonymous Leaks. Previous Washington Post stories
sourced to anonymous "officials" have fallen apart, including Josh Rogin's January 26 report claiming that "the State
Department's entire senior management team just resigned" as "part of an ongoing mass exodus of senior Foreign Service
officers who don't want to stick around for the Trump era." The story went viral before the truth caught up.
As per procedure, the Obama administration had, in coordination with the incoming Trump administration, asked for the resignations
of all political appointees. While it would have been traditional to let them stay for a few months, the Trump team let
them know that their services wouldn't be necessary. The entire story was wrong.
Analyzing
the Trump/Russia Intelligence Story. [Scroll down] So, let's have a little analytical look at the
story. First of all, every U.S. person in the room denies it, specifically saying no "sources and methods" were
disclosed. Remember that, it's important. Apparently, the Trump people did report to the NSA and CIA what they
talked about with the Russians, and that some of it was highly classified. Following that, the story was leaked by
"current and former U.S. officials," speaking anonymously, of course. One thing we know — since we know
exactly who was in the meeting — is that these "current and former officials" were not in the meeting.
Washington
Post Creates Fake News Timed-Release Story Intended to Capture Evening News Lede. Always remember the basic
rule that has been proven accurate 100% of the time: • When the CIA wants to leak a damaging story
they coordinate with the Washington Post and ABC. (and vice-versa). • When the State Dept. or FBI/DOJ
wants to leak a damaging story they coordinate with CNN and the New York Times. (and vice-versa) This consistent pattern
has NEVER been broken.
Top
Stars at CNN on Chopping Block as Network May Fire Hundreds After Trump Landslide
Victory. The legacy media is dead. Top stars at fake news CNN are on the chop
as the network mulls firing hundreds after Trump won the 2024 presidential election.
According to Nielsen ratings obtained by Mediaite, both MSNBC and CNN have seen their ratings tank
after last week's Trump landslide election. "Insiders told Puck the new round of firings will
likely see on-air talent like them affected, as the network's new CEO looks to free up finances
amid waning ratings[,]" Puck News reported.
Federal
Court Backs 2nd CNN Defamation Case, Calls Out Aversion to Truth. Loose lips sink
ships and apparently CNN's loose relationship with the truth could sink the Cable News
Network. In a truly scathing concurring opinion published Thursday breathing new life into
Project Veritas' defamation case against the liberal news network, Judge Ed Carnes with the 11th
Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals called out CNN for "downplaying the importance of telling the truth
in its broadcasts" and used CNN's own employees to do it. The case involves CNN lying about
what got right-wing investigative journalism organization Project Veritas kicked off of
then-Twitter. CNN falsely claimed they were banned from the platform (before Elon Musk bought
it) for spreading misinformation when, in reality, they were banned for posting someone's address;
in violation of Twitter's rules. Those are two very different reasons, but as Judge Carnes
pointed out from CNN's filing, CNN calls that an "immaterial detail" of the story. In the
opening paragraph of his concurring opinion, Judge Carnes seemed disgusted with CNN and ruling that
the case should proceed[.]
"I
Was Wrong": CNN Panelist Retracts Trump-Cheney "Firing Squad" Propaganda. After the
MSM spent the day in histrionics peddling the falsehood that Trump said Liz Cheney should face a
firing squad, when he was simply calling her a chickenhawk, CNN panelist Jonah Goldberg offered
a mea culpa, and has retracted his claim that Trump called for Cheney's execution. "This
morning on CNN I referred to Trump's "rifles" quote as him advocating a 'firing squad' for Liz
Cheney," said Goldberg. "I was wrong to say he was calling for a firing squad execution.
After I said that, my co-panelist, Brad Todd made the case that I was wrong." "I let my
disgust at Trump's comments get the better of me as this was the first time I'd heard them."
CNN
Commentator Says White People Who Don't Vote For Kamala Harris Need to Be Held Accountable.
CNN commentator and co-host of 'Native Land Pod,' Angela Rye, said white people who don't vote for Kamala
Harris need to be held accountable. This should win over the white vote! In 2016, white
non-Hispanic voters preferred Trump over Hillary Clinton 58% to 37%, according to the exit poll conducted
by Edison Research for the National Election Pool. In 2020, white non-Hispanic voters preferred Trump
over Biden 58% to 41%, according to Roper Center for Public Opinion Research.
The Editor says...
The presidential election is conducted with a secret ballot for just this reason — so the losing
party won't hold anyone "accountable." This concept was universally understood until the public schools
stopped teaching civics and history and good citizenship.
CNN
fearmongers about Antarctica greening at an 'alarming' rate. A new "climate change"
article from CNN, like all the continuous articles on the weather, storms, or warming, is meant to
scare people into capitulating into completely changing their way of life. The media just
regurgitates what they are told without asking questions or doing research, pushing the green
agenda to confiscate more money and power for the government. Our freedom and prosperity are
at risk because of this agenda. [...] Yes, it was warm in Antarctica in 2022, which is all of the
actual scientific data that this article had to offer. But, it was also extremely cold; April
of that year saw an all time record low: ["] [...] The temperature dropped to
-76.8 °C (-106.2 °F), a rare temperature for mid-April, said climatologist Maximiliano
Herrera.["] Somehow though, the researchers and reporters also didn't mention that in
2021, just one year before the 2022 figures cited for warming, Antarctica had the coldest six
months on record; also reported by CNN: [...]
Mark
Robinson Files Defamation Suit against CNN over 'Black Nazi' Story. North Carolina
lieutenant governor Mark Robinson filed a defamation lawsuit against CNN over an article the
network published connecting the Republican gubernatorial nominee to numerous salacious race and
sex-related comments posted on a porn site years ago, his campaign announced at a Tuesday morning
news conference in Raleigh. Robinson has categorically denied the contents of the report,
which connects him to a username that identified as a "black Nazi" and defended slavery on a
porn-site messaging board years ago, among other unsavory posts. The report prompted the
Republican Governors Association to stop reserving ads on his behalf, as National Review first
reported last month, and also resulted in an exodus of staffers from his campaign team as well as
his official lieutenant governor's office. Privately, Republicans say the race is now
Democratic attorney general John Stein's to lose.
CNN
Web Content to Go Behind Paywall. Well, if The New York Times is correct, the number
of people seeing CNN content will get asymptotically close to zero soon. The ailing network
is struggling, and in an attempt to shore up its revenues, it will experiment with putting its
content behind a paywall, making people kick in real money to access its content. It's a move
I understand on an intellectual level. The revenue streams in media these days are few, with
the vast majority going to social media which scoops up the content and feeds it to people while
grabbing the dollars for the eyeballs. And as much as we hate the fact that content costs
money to produce, the fact is that content costs money to produce. [...] Unfortunately, with the
exception of a couple of personalities, nobody wants what they are selling. 90% of the content
they put out is dreck.
The Editor says...
As Regis Philbin used to say, "Who kez?"
CNN
Admits to Using 'Digitally Altered' Photos of Donald Trump, Laura Loomer. CNN issued
an on-air retraction and admitted to using "digitally altered" photos of former President Donald
Trump and right-wing activist and influencer Laura Loomer. In a post on X, Loomer shared a
video of CNN issuing a retraction after CNN hosts, such as Anderson Cooper, used a "digitally
altered" photo of Trump and Loomer in "a number of segments" on Friday and Saturday. "Friday
evening and on Saturday, CNN aired a number of segments that briefly showed an image of former
President Donald Trump and Laura Loomer taken from social media," the CNN host said. "On review,
this image had been digitally altered by a third party and should not have been included. We
regret the error.["]
The Editor says...
No, they only regret getting caught.
Dana
Bash Claims Second Would-Be Assassin's 'Anti-Trump Posts' Have 'Nothing To Do With Kamala Harris
And Joe Biden'. CNN's Dana Bash on Monday claimed that former President Donald
Trump's attempted assassination suspect Ryan Wesley Routh's anti-Trump social media posts have no
relation to Vice President Kamala Harris and President Joe Biden. Trump accused Harris and
Biden in a Monday Fox News Digital interview of espousing "rhetoric" that he claimed is
contributing to the attempts on his life. Bash, on "CNN Newsroom with Wolf Blitzer," noted
that both Harris and Biden have said they are grateful Trump was unscathed after the second attempt
and dismissed any suggestion that they influenced Routh, despite his posts, including one mirroring
their repeated claim that "democracy is on the ballot," according to reports.
CNN
puts 'live' banner on pre-recorded Harris-Walz interview. CNN displayed a live banner
during the entirety of anchor Dana Bash's pre-taped exclusive Thursday interview with Vice
President Kamala Harris and her running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz. Bash made it
apparent at the start of the broadcast that the interview with Harris and Walz had been recorded
earlier on Thursday and was not airing live. It was Harris' first sit-down interview since
launching her 2024 presidential campaign on July 21 and aired exclusively on CNN at 9 p.m.,
with Bash providing live commentary on location in Georgia throughout the broadcast. [Tweet]
So
what really was witheld from CNN's 41-minute interview with Kamala Harris? Is CNN a
news network or a public relations agency? What else can one conclude but the latter, now
that we learn that CNN did a 41-minute interview with Democrat presidential nominee Kamala Harris,
but only released 18 minutes of it to the public, both in its broadcast and in its
transcript. That was its big news scoop, the first major interview of Kamala Harris since Joe
Biden was forced to pull out of the race last month. For a news agency to withold ... the
news ... is strange stuff indeed, given that news is supposed to be what it does, and its bread and
butter. [...] Now we get a purported leak as to the reason why: [Advertisement] [Tweet]
So we learn that Harris's undoubtedly mangled and contradictory responses to questions about fracking
were a mess, meaning, CNN was running cover for her in order to make her look better than she really
was. Worse still, CNN apparently gave Harris veto power over what went into the CNN interview and
what didn't. That's the biggest no-no in news. That's not news, that's serving a client.
Bill
Maher: Conservatives Have a Point About CNN's News Coverage. You all know Maher
is an anti-Trump liberal, but the comedian is also not insane. There are times when he must
remind his audience that he thinks Trump is a terrible human being because, for a large chunk of
this season, he's attacked Democrats and liberals more for their nonsense from transgender sex
change surgeries, mask-wearing, and child predators invading Nickelodeon and Disney. He's
decidedly anti-woke. Once again, Maher nailed it on CNN, which is supposed to have unbiased
news coverage. Collins was recently on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, where the audience
erupted into laughter when the host said that she works for a middle-of-the-road news
network — everyone knows that's nonsense, even Maher.
CNN
beclowns itself and says the markets yearn for Kamala. According to most of the
media, the Democratic National Convention is so "electrifying," and pure "joy[.]" The
journalists have clearly received their talking points from the DNC, or they wouldn't all be using
the same words. The Democrats have been telling us how great Joe Biden was for
three-and-a-half years, until we saw him in the debate, even calling him "sharp as a tack."
They told us that Kamala was weak and unpopular, and an albatross around Joe's neck. Now, she
is the greatest thing since sliced bread, despite running away from her record and Biden's policies
as fast as she can, because she knows they're losers. Here is CNN telling us that Wall Street
is gravitating toward her, and it's clearly our turn to cackle when we read a headline and article
like this: ["]How Kamala Harris is winning over Wall Street [...] ["] There is
just so much to love! Let's blame corporations for greed and gouging when they make a small
profit, instead of big government spending and regulations.
Police
officer fights for his life due to violent unrest fanned by false CNN reports.
Through deceptive coverage, CNN fans racial unrest and incites rioting in places like
Ferguson. Then CNN reports on the violence it incites, which brings it more ad revenue.
CNN's deception recently bore fruit when a police officer was attacked by protesters in Ferguson,
suffering a "severe brain injury" that may result in his death. Ferguson is the place where
Michael Brown attacked a police officer in 2014, and attempted to take his gun, which resulted in
the police officer shooting Brown in self-defense. The police officer was later cleared by
both local prosecutors and the progressive Civil Rights Division of the Obama Justice
Department. But CNN peddled the lie that Brown was shot with his hands up, saying "don't
shoot." As Newsbusters notes, "'Hands Up, Don't Shoot Never Happened," even though "news
outlets, left-wing blogs and liberal politicians joined in advancing the false narrative," such as
when "CNN panelists held their hands up in solidarity with protesters" falsely claiming that Brown
was shot with his hands up.
CNN
[is] Effectively Worthless After Parent Warner Bros Takes $9.1 Billion Writedown. What
had been obvious "to the rest of us" for years, is finally official: late last night, shares of
Warner Bros. Discovery, the parent of CNN and TNT, crashed 10% to the lowest level on record after
it reported dire results, which missed across the board and plunged across every income statement
category... [Illustration] ...but the biggest hit — and surprise — was the company's
stunning $9.1 billion charge taken to write down the value of its traditional TV networks, such as
CNN and TNT, which were acquired in 2022 when Warner Bros Discovery was created as part of its acquisition
of WarnerMedia. The write down confirmed that legacy cable channels like CNN and TNT are no longer
worth what they were when the $42 billion merger was completed. In fact, judging by the
ongoing mass layoffs at the former, one can argue that CNN's value is now negative and will continue
to be so until it stops hemorrhaging cash.
Trump's
Courage and Biden's Failures. [Scroll down] Nevertheless, until the
Trump-Biden televised debate, many of the pundits on mainstream media including those on CNN and
MSNBC, continually denied the fragility and lack of coherence of our President. After the
debate, a large panel of commentators appeared on CNN to analyze and comment on the debate.
All without exception claimed to be shocked and dismayed by Pres. Biden's performance.
Van Jones, a member of the post-debate panel, described Biden's performance as "painful." In short,
the post-debate panel did a complete about face on the issue of Biden's communication skills and
competence as the top elected official in this country. [...] Not one word was uttered by anyone
about having made mistakes in denying Biden's lack of acuity for more than three years. Not
one word was uttered by anyone portraying Trump in a positive light. The entire focus was on
Biden's lack of clarity, lack of focus, and upon his significant cognitive decline. Trump
received no compliments for his clarity, goals, or manifest leadership qualities during the debate.
CNN
Caught Lying About Disbanding 'Race and Equity' Team. CNN, a far-left propaganda
outlet that spreads conspiracy theories and violence, tried to lie its way out of the awesome news
that it had disbanded its stupid "race and equity" reporting team. Disgraced CNN CEO Mark
Thompson is hoping to restructure his failing Hate Outlet into something sustainable by adding on
some kind of a subscription "lifestyle journalism" service. The far-left New York Times has
successfully funded its news lies and propaganda with puzzles, recipes, and travel tips.
CNNLOL is hoping it can do the same.
Supreme
Court's Trump immunity ruling is what the body was designed for — unpopular but
constitutionally correct. Within minutes of the Supreme Court's decision on
presidential immunity, liberal politicians and pundits seemed to move from hyperbole to
hyperventilation. When not breathing into paper bags, critics predicted, again, the end of
the republic. CNN's Van Jones declared that it was "almost a license to thug, in a way."
[...] Jones warned the justices that "politically it's bad" for them to rule this way. The
comment captures the misguided analysis of many media outlets. The Supreme Court was designed
to be unpopular; to take stands that are politically unpopular but constitutionally correct.
Indeed, the Democrats have become the very threat that the court was meant to resist.
Recently, senators demanded that Chief Justice John Roberts appear to answer to them for his own
decisions. (Roberts wisely declined.)
The Editor says...
This is the first time I've seen thug used as a verb. Using a noun as a verb doesn't make it a verb.
Rep.
Matt Gaetz Points Out CNN's Dana Bash Used Hand Signals During Debate. Rep. Matt
Gaetz (R-FL) recently shared a video that shows CNN's Dana Bash giving hand signals during the
Trump-Biden debate. In a post on X, Gaetz shared the video and wrote, "Dana Bash, what are
you doing?" In the video, Bash, who moderated the debate, can be seen pointing to her right in
the direction of Joe Biden. Many users on X, speculated that Bash's move was to alert Biden
that it was his turn to speak.
What
to Expect from the Presidential 'Debate'. [Scroll down] Speaking of
journalistic duties, shouldn't the Clinton News Network be expected to apologize for pushing the
Clinton-Obama Russia Hoax for so many years before being rewarded with a national debate?
Shouldn't CNN apologize for falsely claiming that Hunter Biden's "laptop from Hell" was "Russian
disinformation" in the lead-up to the 2020 election? CNN has a documented record of
committing fraud against the American people and interfering in elections.
CNN
Could Be Forced to Pay Upwards of $1 Billion from Defamation Suit from Tapper Show.
The case may not be as well known (yet), but CNN could be facing a defamation liability rivaling or
exceeding the $787 million Fox News paid out to Dominion Voting Systems. NewsBusters
recently reported on Florida's First District Court of Appeals affirming that plaintiff Zachary
Young could seek punitive damages, in addition to economic and emotional damages, from the Cable
News Network in a civil trial after they allegedly defamed him regarding his work in getting people
out of Afghanistan. The total could near or exceed $1 billion. For that outcome
to be remotely in the cards, Young needed to prove malice and according to the ruling, he's done
exactly that. "Young sufficiently proffered evidence of actual malice, express malice, and
a level of conduct outrageous enough to open the door for him to seek punitive damages," Judge
L. Clayton Roberts wrote in the court's ruling.
Gretchen
Whitmer Conveniently 'Loses Connection' When Asked Awkward Question About Hunter
Biden. Michigan Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer proved over the weekend that
her party will engage in whatever antics it needs to, even if that means dodging questions about
Hunter Biden while hypocritically shredding former President Donald Trump as a "convicted felon."
Whitmer appeared on a segment of CNN's "State of the Union" with Dana Bash on Sunday. When
asked about Biden's felony trial for allegedly lying on a federal gun form that asked if he was
addicted to drugs in 2018, the governor unconvincingly indicated she couldn't hear Bash. [...]
Some astute observers noted Whitmer peered off camera at the 18-second mark in the clip above when
the question about Biden was being asked, causing speculation about how deliberate this connection
issue was.
Why
Did CNN Say the Israeli Hostages Were 'Released?'. This is a story of two contrasting
headlines. When Karen wrote about the rescue of four Israeli hostages by the IDF, she said
"IDF Heroes Rescue Four Israeli Hostages Still Alive." However, CNN initially took a very
different approach during a segment featuring Victor Blackwell and Ian Bremmer. A chyron
appeared during the segment declaring, "Gantz postpones news conference after hostage release."
Pardon me? Did you say... "release?" Hamas didn't release anyone. The IDF undertook
a bloody, dangerous mission to retrieve those four hostages and slay the monsters who had been
holding them as prisoners and terrorizing them for eight months. One soldier died as a result
of the effort. The only people "released" were the souls of the Hamas terrorists who are no
doubt currently on their way to rot in hell. The New York Post noted that plenty of people
"pounced" on CNN's blunder.
The
economic indicators' used by the media elite. David Chalian, political director for
CNN, can't understand for the life of him why the economy is still "front and center" for most
Americans, because there are other things that Joe Biden "performs worse on." (Are there
though?) On a recent CNN segment, Chalian was caught scoffing at the stupid rubes ("Americans")
who "disapprove" of Biden's handling of the economy, because these uneducated flyover saps pay more
attention to how they're feeling rather than the "economic indicators and data" that all the media
elite "report on constantly." [Tweet with video clip] [...] Those "feelings" that Chalian's
talking about aren't really feelings, but legitimate indicators of where the economy is, and ones
with which we interact constantly; here are just a few examples: [...]
CNN
beclowns itself by confirming the escalating cost-of-living crisis while trying to pin it on
Trump. A recent article from Matt Egan at CNN admits that Americans have a problem
paying for things... but neither he, nor any of the outlet's other employees ever bring up Joe
Biden or his policies as a significant cause of the problem; [...] Egan says the problem has been
building for years instead of admitting that inflation didn't start increasing rapidly until
Biden took office. Despite COVID and supply chain issues, inflation remained below 2%...
until Biden. The economy was growing rapidly pre-Biden, despite the entire country having
come to a screeching halt over a virus, yet he signed the $2 trillion American Rescue
Plan, and fulfilled his campaign promise to destroy affordable energy (oil), which sent prices
skyrocketing. He compounded the inflation problem by issuing executive orders to open the
borders: housing, food, education, healthcare, law enforcement, energy, and other things are
obviously strained when millions of people are suddenly thrown into the mix, bringing no wealth and
anti-American cultures and ethos. The federal budget is around 60% higher than before COVID,
and they are borrowing trillions each year. That obviously puts pressure on prices and forces
an increase in interest rates. Here's how Egan framed it though, to distract from the obvious:
["]From the historically unaffordable housing market and budget-breaking day care rates
to high car prices, the United States has a cost of living problem many years in the making.["]
Keepin'
the logic fluffy and the spin immoral at CNN. Watching CNN is a bit like watching
someone who locked their keys in a convertible — with the top down — except
that it's less watchable, and not nearly as fun or funny outside of the irony of the "most trusted
name in news" lying like Pinocchio all day, every day. [...] It's not even news, it's "news"
(fictionalized current events themed advocacy based programming). CNN doesn't make it up as
they go, they are fed an endless steaming pile of narrative, and they just regurgitate it.
Just
think of the list of flat-out lies that Democrats told about the Trump Administration.
[#1] A small but blindingly bright marquee example was "Koi-gate," which even NPR
had to admit was a garbage take by CNN and a fair mob of others. President Trump and (the now
late) Prime Minister Abe each dumped a box of fish food in a koi pond in Japan, but the media focused
only on Trump and spun what he did as a "world stage" blunder. On the face of it, it's a petty
attack in the grand scheme of things, but even light scrutiny reveals it as notably egregious, as the
live video was broadcast worldwide.
[#2] Then there was the alleged collusion between Wikileaks and Don Jr. Once
again, "The Most Trusted Name in News," CNN, carried the ball. [...]
[#3] The New York Times and many, many other outlets reported that Trump cruelly
caged illegal immigrant children. From this emerged one of Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
(D-NY)'s most iconic and heavily memed photographs. Oops. The inhumanity ascribed to
Trump was actually from the Obama era. And while we're on the subject, one of Time Magazine's
most memed covers came from yet another illegal immigrant child story gone, shall we say, fabululistly wrong.
[#4] The so-called "Steele Dossier" was a real biggie. [...]
[#5] And finally, Paul Manafort allegedly "sharing" polling information with the
Russians? Yeah, that never happened.
CNN
Appears on the Verge of an Epic Collapse. CNN has been desperately treading water for
years now. The former king of cable news has been bleeding ratings for years, with Fox News
typically topping all the networks night after night. CNN still fancies itself the "most
trusted name in news," yet, even former CEO Chris Licht admitted last year that that
trust — assuming at one point they actually had it — is long gone and they
need to restore it. He didn't last long. The problem, of course, is that CNN claims to
be fair and without bias, yet anti-conservative views have long been part of its DNA, as the
network's on-air talent routinely bases its reports on Democratic Party talking points. Even
token conservatives on the network are a joke, and sound more like liberal pundits. The
struggling network is now desperately trying to get out of its death spiral, and step one is to cut
costs by axing the remaining big name talents who have extremely large salaries.
Migrant
Gang Rape Of Child In Italy Prompts CNN To Worry About "Far-Right". After a group of
migrants gang-raped a 13-year-old girl in Italy, CNN responded by expressing concern about how it
might help the "far-right." Yes, really. The girl was raped in front of her boyfriend in
a public park in the Sicilian city of Catania. The seven suspects are all Egyptian migrants
and three were under the age of 18. In reporting the story, CNN's main focus was to worry
about how the incident, which is just "the latest in a string of shocking sexual attacks in the
country," might increase political support for the right-wing. [Tweet]
CNN
Falsely Implies SCOTUS Banned Texas From Installing Razor Wire. CNN's Dana Bash
solemnly lamented on Friday's [1/26/2024] Inside Politics that Texas Gov. Greg Abbott
is in defiance of a recent Supreme Court ruling regarding razor wire at the border there was just
one problem: the Court never said the wire was illegal. What the Court did was remove an
injunction that prohibited federal authorities from removing the wire while the underlying case is
litigated. Theoretically, the feds could remove the wire, do whatever it is they need to do,
leave, and Texas could put the wire right back, but Bash warned, "Texas is ignoring the highest
court in the land. This week the Supreme Court ruled that the Biden Administration has the
legal authority to remove razor wire along the Southern border, but the Lone Star State governor
doesn't care and is blocking federal agents from accessing it."
CNN
[is] Not Even Hiding [its] Anti-Gun Agenda Anymore. The CNN of today isn't doing
groundbreaking reporting that literally no one else could do. Instead, they're pushing an
agenda. In fairness, this isn't new, but with the DOJ report on Uvalde coming out last week,
one would think they'd at least focus on what the report actually said. It outlined law
enforcement failures that led to the death of so many innocent children. That ain't what CNN
is pushing, though. [...] Now, we've seen this kind of thing from supposed journalists
before. Anti-gun voices on the news get to say pretty much whatever they want, unchallenged,
while anyone who opposes gun control finds themselves in a debate with the host. This isn't
new by any stretch. Further, it's also just one program on CNN. One could easily dismiss
this as simply a single program or producer or some other entity rather than the network as a
whole. One should not.
The
climate doomsayers' cooked up coffee crisis. Popular things easily
recognized — even cherished — by people are continually identified as being
at risk of being damaged or destroyed by climate change. Coffee, for example, is a commodity
experiencing a surge in popularity, and there are no prizes for guessing what climate doomsayers
are saying now. Yes, coffee is now said to be under threat from man-made climate change.
CNN, in a recent article, made this statement: "climate change poses a huge threat to the
coffee business and to farmers." Keeping with its customary approach of presenting climate
change as a threat to all manner of things, CNN quotes the Inter-American Development Bank as
warning that "rising temperatures will reduce the area suitable for growing coffee by up to 50%."
Is this claim true?
The
Comical Democrat-Media January 6 Storyline for Election Year 2024 Carries On.
As election year 2024 begins, the Democrat "News"-media Colluders (DNC) roll out their free
campaign commercials for the Democrats. One of these, featuring a clip CNN's Phil Mattingly, is
found in an article titled "'There's The Truth and There Are Lies!' CNN Anchor Destroys Republicans
Over Trump-Inspired Riot in Blistering Commentary." Unfortunately, the arguments in the article
and clip are literally terrible, containing demonstrably false information, and provide no direct
evidence whatsoever that Trump intended an insurrection. None!
CNN
Report on Claudine Gay Resignation — This Spin You Have to Watch to Believe.
There are times when the words that come from the mouth of the Moonbats at CNN just need to be emphasized,
so we can all laugh. This is one of those times. Appearing on CNN to discuss the resignation
of Harvard President Claudine Gay, "journalist" Matt Egan takes parsel-tongue spin to new levels of
professional obfuscation. During his review of Gay's plagiarism, Mr. Egan notes Mrs. Gay
has not been "accused of stealing ideas," she has been accused of "copying other people's writing without
attribution." Yes, he actually said that.
Why
The Sudden Media Interest In The Biden Border Crisis? After spending three years
largely ignoring the border, the mainstream press is suddenly all over it, with headlines blaring
about a "surge," "crisis" and "call for action." Why now? Last week CNN reported that a
"December migrant surge" at the southern border was the "largest in more than two decades." Several
other news outlets used similar language. The New York Times warned that "surging" Mexico
border crossings "push U.S. resources to the brink." In another story, CNN even described the
situation as a "crisis." Weirdly, the press is even exaggerating the current "surge."
Consider that CNN story, which says: "Border authorities encountered more than 225,000
migrants along the U.S.-Mexico border this month, marking the highest monthly total recorded since
2000, according to preliminary Homeland Security statistics shared with CNN." Except that's not
true. According to U.S. Customs and Border Protection data, illegal crossings exceeded
225,000 in August, September, October, and November of this year, and in six previous months since
President Joe Biden took office. As a matter of fact, illegal crossings have averaged
more than 200,000 since Biden moved into the White House.
An infomercial masquerading as news: CNN
Wrapped a News Segment about Barbie's Economic Impact in a Commercial for the Film's Streaming
Debut. CNN reported on Friday that Barbie was streaming on Max — in an
alleged news segment that was pretty obviously a commercial for another Warner Bros.
Discovery property. While Barbie was a runaway success at the box office in 2023 and a
feminist pop culture phenomenon, that's not what the segment on CNN This Morning was about.
So —
It Wasn't the Sidewalk After All. This week the Ventura County Sheriff arrested
Professor Loay Abdelfattah Alnaji in the death of Paul Kessler, a 69 year-old man who had been
standing on the sidewalk peacefully supporting Israel. Alnaji, who bashed Kessler with a
megaphone, was charged with involuntary manslaughter and battery causing serious bodily injury and
both these charges contain special allegations that Alnaji "personally inflicted great bodily
injury." This comes as no surprise to most of us who get their news online but it must have been
news to those who read headers which said he died after falling and hitting his head on the
sidewalk. Even after no charges were brought against the sidewalk, CNN's header read "arrest
made in death of Jewish protestor who fell and hit his head." (CNN has now stealthily edited the
header.) The media effort to downplay anti-Semitism, like its coverage of the Israeli response to
the butchery by Hamas, doesn't seem fixable. It's certainly bias, but stupidity also plays a
part, as is demonstrated by their claims that they didn't know the Gaza stringers were Hamas or the
scenes of injured civilians in Gaza were Pallywood.
How
Dumb is CNN? Legacy media outlets are so grotesquely biased that it is easy to forget
how incompetent they are, as well. [Tweet with screenshot of CNN map of Israel] They've
got Tel Aviv on the Golan Heights, and Sderot, which is frequently in the news for being attacked
by Gazan rockets, on the West Bank. I think it is a matter of common knowledge that Tel Aviv
is on the Mediterranean. Would CNN produce a map showing Istanbul in the middle of Asia
Minor? Or Venice up in the Dolomites? I don't know, maybe they would. I know good
help is hard to find, but how do you hire someone to situate cities on a map who doesn't actually
look at a map?
CNN
praises the IRS for 'cracking down' on tax cheats; fails to realize they just described Hunter
Biden. CNN operatives can't really be so naïve that they actually believe the
IRS wouldn't have been able to collect these taxes without passing the falsely named "Inflation
Reduction Act" can they? [...] Hunter Biden failed to pay taxes some years, and allegedly raided
his own daughter's college savings account to pay for prostitutes (and who knows what else).
This behavior certainly constitutes fraud, but the IRS and the (In)Justice Department have been
extremely soft on him. He is the son of a Democrat president, therefore, he is
special. The media and other Democrats have known how Joe enabled his family to collect
kickbacks around the world because of his powerful political position and really don't [care].
[...] Incidentally, there is no statute of limitations for people like Hunter who intentionally
commit criminal tax evasion. So why are the prosecutors acting like there is? Why is
the public intentionally being misinformed?
CNN's
claims about Gaza are loaded with canards. Here is an obvious one: CNN claims
Gaza is an "open air prison" with, by implication, Israel the oppressive jailer. But Gaza is
not an "open-air prison" as CNN reporters have said several times on their programming. If
it's an open-air prison, how do they explain the thousands of rockets, drones, attack boats, para
gliders, automatic rifles, and other sophisticated equipment that the Hamas terrorists were able to
bring in? Does a prison exist where it is possible to sneak in that kind of weaponry?
Doesn't CNN understand that they are aiding and abetting not to mention inflaming pro-terrorist
supporters with their terrorist-supportive rhetoric? And each time CNN claims Israel has a
barrier between it and Gaza (they call it a blockade), they should remember to include Egypt as
doing the same, reminding their viewers that Israel placed barriers up to protect from incidences
that they sadly were unable to stop this past week. The original barriers were only put up
after the Palestinian terrorism began.
CNN,
with John Kelly's help, resurrects the lie that Trump insulted America's veterans.
The old adage is that a lie will travel halfway around the world before the truth gets its pants
(or boots) on. That's what CNN and former Trump White House Chief of Staff John Kelly are
counting on because they're resurrecting debunked claims that Trump attacked America's veterans and
those who died in battle. After all, as the late, unlamented Harry Reid said in 2012 after
lobbing charges against Mitt Romney that he knew were false, helping to keep Mitt out of the White
House, "Romney didn't win, did he?" John Kelly is another member of the military cadre that
turned so hard against Donald Trump, despite having served as Donald Trump's Secretary of Homeland
Security and Chief of Staff.
Can
You Spot The Difference Between The Menendez And Biden Foreign Influence Scandals?
[Scroll down] A number of astute people noted how CNN was credulous to the point of
absurdity, but near as I can tell, no one has yet noted that CNN's "fact check" needs... a fact
check. "On the allegation that these dinners with Joe Biden 'resulted in cars,' [Hunter Biden
business partner Devon] Archer said the businessman Rakishev wired Hunter Biden the exact amount of
money that Hunter used to buy a Porsche. This car has nothing to do with Joe Biden," notes
CNN. To start, the $142,300 wasn't used to buy a Porsche — it was used to buy a
Fisker Karma, an EV sports car made by an automotive start-up that got $192 million in loans from
the Department of Energy to, among other things, take over an abandoned General Motors factory in
Wilmington, Delaware, which is coincidentally the Bidens' hometown. Fisker defaulted on those
massive loans, costing American taxpayers $132 million, and Hunter later traded the Karma for a Porsche.
CNN
Gets Roasted for Absurd Chyron Warning Constitution is 'Outdated, Puts Democracy at
Risk'. The few remaining viewers of CNN got a remarkable dose of news on
Saturday. Just in time for Constitution Day, CNN's dwindling audience learned that the
Consitution of the United States — the oldest written government charter in the world
and the document that gave birth to the nation that has spread democracy around the
globe — has become so "outdated" that it's actually a "threat to democracy." Of
course, that's democracy as CNN's scholars understand it. And you can't spell ignorance
without "C-N-N."
CNN
wants you to panic over COVID despite a lack of data. It seems like we're beginning
to detect a pattern here. Joe Biden recently announced that he would be requesting funding
for yet another vaccine intended to combat the latest strains of COVID making the rounds. But
public interest in the experimental vaccines has declined sharply this year, to put it
charitably. So the legacy media seems to be gearing up to see if they can get everyone into a
panic over some sort of resurgence of the pandemic. One example of that trend showed up at
CNN yesterday, with an unsubtle title reading, "It seems like everyone has COVID-19. Here's why
this wave is probably worse than official data suggests." That came as a surprise to me, since
I hadn't been hearing much of anything locally suggesting that there were more COVID patients than
usual, though there clearly have been cases showing up around the country and possibly even a
couple of new variants.
CNN's
claim that Trump's team hacked Georgia voting systems is belied by its facts. Fani
Willis, the Fulton County, Georgia, District Attorney, is seemingly intent upon being the next
Alvin Bragg, as she busily puts together an indictment based on questionable facts, currently
mysterious legal theories, and, most importantly, leaks to the media. It's the last that
concerns us today because CNN is very excited: On January 7, the outlet strongly imply,
Donald Trump's team, everyone from Rudy Guiliani to Sidney Powell, hacked into, or oversaw someone
else hacking into, the Coffee County election software. Except that, according to CNN itself,
that's not what happened.
CNN
analyst: Donald Trump is Osama bin Laden II. Hating Donald Trump is a valuable
skill if you have the right connections. It can open doors, bring you riches and fame, and
induce presumably intelligent people to idolize you and hang on to your every word. Michael
Fanone, a retired DC police officer has used his hatred of Trump in just such a manner. He is
the co-author of a self-aggrandizing book and a regular CNN contributor. Why is he on CNN?
He hates Trump and blames his own injuries from the riot on him. He appeared on CNN yesterday
in order to declare Donald Trump a terrorist comparable to Osama bin Laden, and even his
interviewer seemed a bit surprised by the comparison. I don't know why, since Trump has been
compared to the Nazis many times, so why not throw in some good ol' al Qeada terrorists as well?
CNN
Anguishes Over 81-Year-Old McConnell's Health, Ignores Same Issues With 80-Year-Old
Biden. In yet another example of why embattled CNN continues to swirl down the
ratings toilet, CNN News Central on Thursday featured a laughable segment about 81-year-old
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell's age and health issues following an earlier moment when he
stopped speaking during a press event. Host John Berman and congressional correspondent Manu
Raju talked about the incident at length, pointing to McConnell's past falls and suggesting
complications might make him incapable of carrying out his senatorial responsibilities. Just
one problem. 80-year-old Joe Biden has also fallen multiple times, tripped while walking up
staircases, mumbled incoherently on numerous occasions, and abruptly started wandering around on
the stage in the middle of making public comments — and CNN, self-anointed as "The Most
Trust Name in News," has ignored every minute of it.
Washington
is gaslighting on "climate change". Baby, it's hot outside. Right on cue, a New
York Times headline links this surge in temperatures to "climate change." [...] We had multiple ice
ages and heat waves long before we had coal mines, gas-guzzling automobiles and air
conditioning. Or human-made CO2 emissions. Or human-made anything. The biggest
source of greenhouse gas emissions has been Mother Nature. Forest fires and volcano eruptions
have been some of the leading causes of greenhouse gases being released into the atmosphere.
The forest fires in California last year and Canada this summer have undone almost all the
"progress" in reducing carbon emissions from the green energy fad. Instead of outlawing cars,
how about better forest management? You've probably heard some of the preposterous
scaremongering from politicians and the media. CNN declared in big, bold letters that "global
temperatures are likely highest in at least 100,000 years." According to whom? "One
scientist told CNN."
CNN
cuts Hunter Biden laptop reference from RNC chair's interview clip. The Republican
National Committee cried foul Friday after CNN cut references to Hunter Biden's laptop and the
"spies who lie" letter meant to discredit it from an interview clip of RNC Chairwoman Ronna
McDaniel. Anchor Chris Wallace was pressing McDaniel about the integrity of the 2020 election
result, but the network edited out her remarks about the social media suppression of The Post's
bombshell reporting on the first son when Wallace asked about how "fair" she thought the process
was. "I don't think he won it fair, I don't. I'm not gonna say that," McDaniel said of
President Biden's electoral victory. "Let's look at the Hunter Biden laptop. Fifty-one people
in the intelligence agencies signed a letter saying it was Russian disinformation; that's what the
public disseminated, was being told. That's not true. That's a lie." "So you're
suggesting that he may not be the legitimately elected president?" Wallace asked. "I'm saying
the American people were not given the information they deserve before that election," she replied.
CNN
Rules Republicans Are the Enemy of Kids and Climate. During Friday's CNN This
Morning, the network covered 16 young people suing the state of Montana over climate change.
Chief climate correspondent Bill Weir portrayed the young people as the heroes of a movie where
they attempt to fend off the Republican-controlled government, despite admitting that the lawsuit
would not change anything even if the judge ruled in favor of the plaintiffs. The lawsuit
merely singled out Montana Republicans and blamed them for the existence of fossil fuel. CNN
called it "fascinating" and "such a great story." The case hinged on the following clause in
the Montana state constitution: "The state shall maintain and improve a clean and healthful
environment for present and future generations." Nate Bellinger, senior staff attorney for Our
Children's Trust claimed that fossil fuel-induced climate change forfeited the young people's right
to a healthful environment.
CNN's
Mostly False Take on Biden's Stance on Abortion. As CNN looks for a new leader,
then-CNN host Brian Stelter proposed this as the most important question: "What should an anchor do
when a guest says something untrue?" The public could turn this question around: "What
should a politician do when a CNN host says something untrue?" The Stelters of this world
cannot imagine anyone at CNN would ever say anything false. They arrogantly presume they
always defend the "truth."
CNN:
apologists for terror. CNN's Christiane Amanpour appeared tone deaf to the public
outcry over her "news analysis" involving a mother and her two young daughters left for dead by
three Palestinian terrorists in Northern Samaria. She used the blatantly false term
"shootout" to describe the cold-blooded murder of Lucy Dee and her two daughters, Maia, 20 and
Rina, 15, as if suggesting an exchange of gunfire had taken place at the time the terrorists
sprayed bullets into the Dee family vehicle. The Dee family was unarmed and en route to a
holiday at the seaside. Amanpour's fanciful imagination at painting a "moral equivalency"
between the two groups was not lost on Rabbi Leo Dee, husband and father to the victims. He
astutely described the reportage as representing a new age of "terror journalism."
CNN's
Jake Tapper says Durham Report is 'devastating' for FBI after spending years legitimizing
Russiagate. Monday's release of the long-awaited Durham Report confirmed widespread
belief among conservatives that the Russia investigation that plagued much of the Trump presidency
stemmed from unsubstantiated and politicized origins. The report, which came following a
four-year investigation led by Special Counsel John Durham, was a major rebuke of the FBI and DOJ,
so much so that even CNN anchor Jake Tapper was stunned. [...] Tapper's comments are significant as
the longtime anchor, one of the first hires of the Jeff Zucker era, was in some ways the face of
CNN's Russiagate coverage just as Rachel Maddow was for MSNBC.
CNN's
Kaitlan Collins Claims 'More Than 200 Mass Shootings in 2023'. CLAIM: During CNN's
Wednesday town hall with Donald Trump, moderator Kaitlan Collins claimed there have been "more than
200 mass shootings in 2023." VERDICT: False, as long as one adheres to the standard definition
of a mass shooting as an incident in which four or more individuals were killed by one attacker in
one incident. On May 7, 2023, Breitbart News noted that President Joe Biden made the same
claim as Collins, and on May 8, 2023, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre repeated it.
Don
Lemon Makes A Racist [Fool] Of Himself, Attacking Presidental Candidate Vivek Ramaswamy Over Skin
Color. Lemon: I don't really see what one has to do with the other — and
using the Civil War to talk about Black Americans — that war was not fought for Black
people to have guns. Ramaswamy: That war was fought for Black people to have freedoms in this
country. Actually, that's why the Civil War was fought. Actually, a funny fact
is — Black people did not get to enjoy the other freedoms until their Second Amendment
rights were secured. Lemon: But Black people still aren't allowed to enjoy the freedoms as
well in this country. Ramaswamy: I disagree with you on that Don. I think you're doing
a disservice to this country by failing to recognize the fact that we have equality before the laws
here. Lemon: Well, OK. When you are in Black skin and you live in this country, then you
can disagree with me.
The Editor says...
Apparently Mr. Lemon thinks your opinion is not valid unless you have black skin. There must be
a name for that kind of mentality. But since he be black, the name can't possibly be RACISM.
Ramaswamy
Schools CNN Host Don Lemon on How Ignorant He Is on Civil Rights. Republican
presidential candidate and entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy has been turning heads with his outspoken
statements on what it means to be an American and the current state of the country since he jumped
into the primary race in late February. One of the proposed planks of his platform is
completely tearing down several federal agencies, including the Department of Education and the
Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI). [...] On Wednesday morning, he took his fledgling campaign
into the lion's den, sitting down for an interview with CNN hosts Don Lemon and Poppy Harlow.
Unsurprisingly, at several points in the conversation, Lemon managed to beclown himself more than once.
What
The Media Did To America Is Far Worse Than The Pandemic Ever Was. Nothing exposed the
media — The New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, and on and on — for the
deceitful, manipulative group of people it is than the pandemic. A grave and urgent emergency
that should have been the most pressing time since 9/11 for national unity was instead exploited by
the media for the purpose of winning an election. The cost: Half the country was trained to
accuse the other of willfully spreading death. [Steve] Kraukauer goes over much of our Covid
nightmare in a section [of his new book] that recounts the corporate press's dishonesty when
covering some prominent commentators who proposed using the prolific drug ivermectin as a potential
treatment for the virus, rather than risk using any of the new vaccines. Although it's been
around forever and is generously prescribed to humans in every first-world nation, all it took was
for popular podcaster Joe Rogan to suggest ivermectin as an alternative to the sacred vaccines for
cable news hosts to denounce it as a dangerous toxin solely used by veterinarians. It was
suddenly a hazardous "livestock drug," as endlessly repeated on CNN.
The Defense
Industry's Ukraine Pundits. Last week, CNN brought on former U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta
for his fourth recent appearance to talk, once again, about Russian President Vladimir Putin's
deadly invasion of Ukraine. "I think we need to understand that there is only one thing that
Putin understands, and that's force," said Panetta on Newsroom. The former CIA director
added: "I think the United States has to provide whatever weapons are necessary to the Ukrainians,
so that they can hit back, and hit back now." At no time did Panetta nor CNN mention that he's
a senior counselor at Beacon Global Strategies, a defense industry consulting firm that has
reportedly represented weapons manufacturer Raytheon. The firm doesn't disclose its clients,
but Raytheon and the defense industry generally stand to benefit from the conflict in
Ukraine. The episode is part of a broader pattern and practice: Since Russia launched its
invasion of Ukraine, cable news networks have routinely called on defense officials-turned-consultants
to offer analysis and help the American public make sense of the crisis. Often, these analysts
have used their TV time to call for greater U.S. involvement and bolder moves that could ratchet up
tensions between two nuclear-armed superpowers. The networks have consistently failed to disclose
these analysts' day jobs, describing them instead by only their former high-ranking military or
government roles — leaving viewers in the dark about the analysts' financial ties to
defense contractors that stand to profit from increased or prolonged conflict.
Dear
Mitch McConnell: You Were Not Elected To Do The Bidding Of Chuck Schumer And CNN.
Manu Raju is a Democrat activist and CNN reporter who camps out in congressional hallways to ask
questions that help advance his party's political agenda. He's done it for years.
Whether the Democrats are doing their Brett Kavanaugh smear, impeachment shenanigans,
Russia-collusion hoax, or anything else, he's there to ask questions that help his team. He's
been doing it for so long that you'd have to be something of an idiot to fall for it, much less
more than once. So, for example, when corporate media and other activists were pretending
that New York Republican Rep. George Santos' deceptions about his biography were the most
important issue facing Americans, Raju was there.
Report:
Jeff Zucker Forbade CNN Staff from Investigating 'Trump Talking Point' Coronavirus Lab Leak
Theory. Former CNN President Jeff Zucker ordered employees during then-President
Donald J. Trump's administration not to investigate the theory that the coronavirus pandemic was
sparked by a lab leak in China, calling it a "Trump talking point," according to a report. A
"well-placed CNN Insider" told Fox News Digital that Zucker issued the directive in the early
stages of the pandemic. On March 13, 2020, Harmeet Kauer, a "culture writer" for CNN, called
the notion that the virus may have started in a laboratory a "fringe theory." Her colleague,
Scottie Andrew, on April 13, 2020, wrote an article entitled "Nearly 30% in the US believe a
coronavirus theory that's almost certainly not true" in regards to the lab leak theory. It
included the subheading, "Its origin is up for debate, but it wasn't made in a lab."
CNN
Misinformation — A Case Study. Some time ago, Fani Willis, the Fulton
County (GA) prosecutor, convened a special grand jury to investigate allegations that Trump tried
to corruptly influence the Georgia Secretary of State to alter 2020 election results. Part of
the grand jury report has been released. Let's see how CNN described the results.
Around 6 AM EST on February 17, CNN Anchor Kaitlan Collins made this statement: "And
so clearly, [the grand jury report] shows you know, once and for all that... there was no election fraud here."
The statement by Collins was misinformation because she left out critical information. A grand jury is
a one-sided affair, and it hears only what the prosecutor lets it hear. Collins should have reminded her
viewers of that fact. A grand jury decides absolutely nothing... "once and for all." If this
statement came only from Kaitlan Collins, I would assume that the omission was unintentional. But
similar words (and omissions) were repeated consistently throughout the day. To me, that suggests
that CNN producers were deliberately spreading misinformation. Here is the CNN misinformation timeline:
[Chart omitted for brevity.] All those experienced CNN anchors, lawyers, and analysts eagerly cited the grand
jury findings, but not one mentioned that those findings are entirely based on the prosecutor's
evidence, as she chose to present it. CNN was spreading coordinated misinformation.
CNN
on pace to have smallest monthly audience since Obama administration among advertiser-coveted
demo. March can't come soon enough for ratings-challenged CNN. The
long-struggling network is on pace to finish February with its smallest monthly audience among the
advertiser-coveted demographic of adults age 25-54 since June 2014. "Anderson Cooper 360,"
"The Lead with Jake Tapper" and Wolf Blitzer's "Situation Room" are on pace to their smallest
audiences since that same month among the critical demo, while "Inside Politics" is on pace for its
least-viewed month among the category since August 2005.
The Editor says...
Back when CNN was shown in all the busiest airports, did the airline passengers count as viewers?
CNN
Remains Unreliable Source on Conservatives Being Censored by Big Tech. In the Trump years, CNN
oppressively promoted the conspiracy theory of Donald Trump's "collusion" with the Russian government to get elected in
2016. So, it was heartbroken when Robert Mueller's investigation ended with a negative verdict: "The
investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government
in its election interference activities." CNN media reporter Oliver Darcy climbed to the mountaintop of
shamelessness in his so-called "Reliable Sources" newsletter on Feb. 8 under the heading "The Collusion Delusion."
Who's delusional now? House Republicans investigating the role of the Biden campaign and the "intelligence
community" in Twitter's suspension of the New York Post over a Hunter Biden story. This is not a "news" letter.
Hosts
'Growing Frustrated' As CNN Sees Worst Ratings Week in Nine Years. It's not news, necessarily, that CNN is
not keeping up with the post-Trump administration times we live in — despite a change in course directed by
new boss Chris Licht following a merger between CNN's parent company and Discovery. But when tanking ratings
continue to sink to levels not seen in nearly a decade, there's bound to be some talk of whether the network is
salvageable at all.
Tyre
Nichols Was Killed By Black Police Officers — CNN Declares It Was Still Due to Racism. The
story of a black man in Memphis who died at the hands of officers following a traffic stop had all the makings of the
next racial strife to rise up in this country. The press has been all over the incident, and the police force has
been routinely indicted. One detail has been very lightly covered, however. The five officers involved in
the incident are all black themselves. This bit of inconvenience for the media and the activists has been a
stumbling block, but at CNN, Van Jones arrives with the solution to their problems: Despite POC police involvement, it
is still a case of white racism. "Huh?!?!" you may respond. Allow him to explain. [...]
CNN
Claims Atlanta Riots Weren't 'Violent' As City Burns. A CNN guest suggested that the Atlanta riots,
pursued by Antifa, in which protestors set cars on fire, smashed windows, and shot fireworks at buildings, were
everything but "violent." David Peisner told CNN's Pamela Brown that the only acts of violence he saw were when
police officers were apprehending rioters as they set the city on fire. "You keep using these words 'violent,
violent, violent, violent'... The only acts of violence against people that I saw were police tackling protesters,"
Peisner said. The liberal guest went on to add that destruction of physical property is not the same as violence
against humans, so therefore it is acceptable.
Stunning
cable news ratings reveal crisis-level decline of CNN. For the "key demo" — the 25-54 year old
audience that advertisers covet — the story is even grimmer for CNN. At 6 AM, CNN can only draw
30,000 viewers in the key demo. In prime time, 8 and 9 PM hours, the hapless Anderson Cooper draws only 50
and 55 thousand key demo viewers, respectively. With ratings this pathetic, CNN's new owners, Warner Brothers
Discovery, may be regretting its purchase. Their new president of CNN, Chris Licht, has so far presided over
further decline. It is no surprise, then, that CNN will be abandoning its landmark CNN headquarters, formerly a
tourist attraction, to save money, and is even contemplating a comedian to rescue its prime time lineup. Unless
Mr. Licht gets a clue and shuns progressives for that role, it will be fruitless.
CNN's
Latest Excuse for Biden Taking Classified Information Would Make Stalin Proud. While you might have
thought that Joe Biden illegally taking and keeping classified information for six years following his vice presidency
was a scandal, CNN is here to set you straight. The legacy cable news outlet — which I've been assured
is getting back to hard news and unbiased reporting — has a new piece out that would make Stalin proud.
In it, they lay out the case that Biden is completely innocent because his final days as vice president were a
"whirlwind," and it's completely probable that these classified documents were just taken by accident, moved to multiple
locations, including the president's home, and kept for over half a decade. Get a load of the picture they
used. This is Pravda on steroids. [Tweet]
Adam
Kinzinger Hired as CNN Senior Political Commentator. In the most predictable breaking news possible, on
Wednesday evening, CNN host Erin Burnett announced on her eponymous program Erin Burnett OutFront that former
anti-Trump Republican and Pelosi-picked January 6 committee member Adam Kinzinger had been hired as a "senior
political commentator" on the network. This, of course, makes perfect sense because other than our friends Scott
Jennings and Stephen Gutowski, Adam Kinzinger is the type of "Republican" voice thar gets a lot of airtime on CNN.
CNN
Calls Freedom of Speech 'Nonsense' in Moronic Rant. Did you know that freedom of speech is "nonsense?"
That's the word from CNN, which let a former CIA flunky spew falsehoods in an attempt to smear Elon Musk's management
of Twitter. As RedState previously reported, Musk is set to grant a "general amnesty" to formerly banned
accounts. There will be some exceptions if those accounts broke the law or engaged in targeted calls for violence,
but a deluge of accounts that simply broke leftwing orthodoxy are set to return. That has the clowns over at CNN
shaking in terror, so much so that they are willing to boot basic constitutional principles in the process.
[Tweets] Everything is about Vladimir Putin to these people. According to them, he stalks the shadows like some
bizarro Batman, ready to pounce at any moment with memes and "disinformation." Of course, Robert Baer is in the same
camp of flacks who insisted that Hunter Biden's laptop was Russian disinformation, and we all saw how that turned out.
CNN
Wildly Spins Like a Top in Incredulous New 'Report' on Suspected Colorado Gunman. After watching various
"reporting" from so-called news outlets, there is no doubt that the claim by the Colorado "Club Q" mass shooting
suspect's attorneys that the person identifies as "non-binary" and likely is not a fervent MAGA supporter has sent The
Usual Suspects into an absolute tailspin. CNN, unsurprisingly, been the worst of the bunch, as we noted Thursday
after they "interviewed" a transgender woman who suggested that Anderson Aldrich, the suspect in the mass shooting that
killed five people, could not possibly have been "non-binary" ... because he's a man. This followed a segment in
which anchor Alisyn Camerota looked visibly agitated and was momentarily speechless after finding out what the lawyers
said, as though she didn't want to believe it. Sadly for Camerota, an NBC News reporter has seemingly confirmed
that Aldrich does indeed identify as a member of the LGBTQ community. Unfortunately, CNN's follow-up "reports"
have actually gotten worse, as evidenced by the below video which features CNN correspondent Nick Watt actually trying
to massage the story to fit a preconceived narrative.
Why you shouldn't
trust CNN for any health information. RFK Jr. wrote two really amazing articles about two of "CNN's
finest": Jake Tapper and Sanjay Gupta. Everyone should read these articles. They are relatively short and
priceless. In a nutshell, Sanjay Gupta and Jake Tapper both spread misinformation and when confronted with the
facts, they simply ignore it and continue on as if everything is OK. Also, RFK makes a compelling case that the flu
vaccine should be stopped. It basically doesn't do anything but make the problem worse.
MSNBC,
CNN contributor claims Republicans will ban all birth control 'Nationwide'. A known MSNBC/CNN contributor
who's also a prolific liar claimed in a [...] tweet posted Friday that Republicans intend to ban condoms, abortion, Plan B
pills, and birth control pills if they retake Congress next month. Never mind that such a drastic proposal would
require the approval of President Joe Biden, a far-left Democrat who loves him some abortion and birth control.
"There will be no condoms. There will be no abortions. There will be no Plan B pills. There will be no
birth control pills," MSNBC/CNN contributor Tristan Snell tweeted. "Republicans will ban them all —
nationwide, all 50 states and DC. They've literally promised to do this, and we need to listen — and
take action," he added.
Donald
Trump Sues CNN in $475 Million Defamation Lawsuit. Former President Donald Trump is suing CNN in a $475
million defamation lawsuit, according to a complaint filed in federal court on Monday [10/3/2022]. The lawsuit
focuses on the network's characterization of Trump as being a "racist," "Russian lackey," "insurrectionist," and its
"persistent association" of Trump to Adolf Hitler and Nazism. "[T]he time has finally come to hold CNN responsible
and legally accountable for their willful deception and defamatory statements made about me and both, directly and
indirectly, my strong, devoted, and patriotic supporters," Trump said in a statement released shortly after his
attorneys filed the lawsuit.
Donald
Trump sues CNN claiming defamation, seeks $475M. Former president Donald Trump sued CNN for defamation on
Monday, seeking $475 million in punitive damages and claiming that the network had carried out a "campaign of libel and
slander" against him. Trump claims in his lawsuit, filed in US District Court in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., that the
network had used its influence as a leading news organization to defeat him politically. CNN declined to comment
on the case.
The Editor says...
Trump is striking while the iron is hot. A year from now, they might not be worth $475 million.
The
American media and the art of grotesque misrepresentations. Andrew Kaczynski is a CNN personality who
published a misleading hit piece on Joe Kent, a Republican candidate in Washington State running for Congress.
Kaczynski's effort perfectly illustrates the debauched, diseased state of modern "journalism." Then, when a Republican
strategist commented on what Kaczynski had done, Mediaite used exactly the same tactic against the Republican
strategist. Joe Kent is an Army veteran who is running on a platform that would have been centrist back in the
1980s and before. He advocates for American jobs, less government regulation, lower taxes, controlled immigration,
the end of foreign wars (once a Democrat position), support for the military and law enforcement, an end to Chinese
aggression, and putting America's interests ahead of those of foreign countries. Only when it comes to the Second
Amendment (for) and abortion (against) would he have been recognized as a Republican back in the day. However,
this is 2022, so pro-American values are "far right," at least as far as Andrew Kaczynski of CNN is concerned.
The old phony-struggling-against-the-wind act: CNN
Busted In Their Coverage Of Hurricane Ian. Florida Govenor Ron DeSantis delivered an update on Thursday
morning following the destruction of Hurricane Ian. Ian was downgraded from a hurricane level 4 when it hit land
to a tropical storm on Thursday morning. [...] However, CNN decided to never let a crisis go to waste! Even [though] the
hurricane was once in a 500-year event as DeSantis himself confirmed, CNN needed to create some fake news and one man
unintentionally trolled the fake news reporter as he was trying to make it look like he was at the heart of the
storm! [Video clip]
CNN
and 'experts' say keeping violent criminals in jail won't make people safer. CNN has turned to its trusted
"experts" to argue that keeping violent criminals in jail would not keep people safe from violent criminals. This
"news" report comes in the aftermath of violent attacks in Memphis, Tennessee. According to CNN's Emma Tucker,
"the suspects in two violent attacks there this month had been released from prison before serving their full sentences
for prior convictions." Naturally, it follows that if they had remained in prison where they belonged, they would
not have been on the street to commit the gruesome crimes that they committed. Ah, but the "experts" see it differently!
CNN
questioned after altering blood-red background of Biden's speech. CNN is facing questions from critics
after the network was busted altering the lighting for President Biden's Thursday address, softening the blood-red hues
to calmer shades of pink. The president came in for withering mockery online for the harsh black and red backdrop,
with many comparing the optics to "Star Wars" and "V for Vendetta." While networks like CNN, MSNBC, CBS and C-SPAN
carrying the speech all originally appeared consistent, CNN noticeably altered the color of the background from red to
pink in real-time.
CNN Journo Who Reported
'Fiery But Mostly Peaceful Protests' Gets Emmy Nomination. The CNN journalist best known for reporting from the
burning scene of "fiery but mostly peaceful protests" following the justified non-fatal police shooting of armed
sexual-assault suspect Jacob Blake in Kenosha, Wis., has been nominated for an Emmy award. CNN correspondent Omar
Jimenez was one of five nominees in the "Outstanding Emerging Journalist" category. A Washington Free Beacon
analysis determined that the word "emerging" is a euphemism for "non-white." Other nominees included Anna Kook of Al Jazeera
Plus, the controversial media outlet funded by Qatari oligarchs, and Vice correspondent Paola Ramos, a "Latinx Communications
Strategist" who worked on Hillary Clinton's failed presidential campaign in 2016. The Kenosha riots in August 2020
lasted nearly a week and caused tens of millions of dollars' worth of property damage. Rioters took to the streets
after a bystander posted a video of Blake's encounter with police. Mainstream journalists repeatedly spread
disinformation by describing Blake as "unarmed."
CNN
Finally Reports on Hunter's Laptop It Once Called 'Breitbart Rabbit Hole'. More than 18 months after describing
Hunter Biden's laptop as a "Breitbart rabbit hole," far-left CNN has begun to report on it. [...] Oh, but now that Biden is
damaged goods... Now that the left wants Biden not to seek reelection... Now the Breitbart rabbit hole is not so
much of a rabbit hole. Now that the Breitbart rabbit hole is useful to the left in holding on to the presidency in 2024
with a different nominee than Biden, CNNLOL is all up in that rabbit hole reporting on the laptop.
Donald
Trump Announces He Is Suing CNN, Will Target Other Media Outlets as Well. Former President Donald Trump on
Wednesday announced his intention to sue CNN, one of the prime purveyors of what Trump has famously deemed "fake news," over
"repeated defamatory statements" against him, warning that he will take similar action against other media outlets as
well. The 282-page letter, addressed to CNN's Chief Executive Officer Chris Licht as well as CNN's executive Vice
President and General Counsel David Vigilante, demands the network publish what is described as ["]...a full and
fair correction, apology, or retraction, in the same editions or corresponding issues of the website publication in which the
aforementioned articles, transcripts, or broadcasts appeared and in as conspicuous a place and type as said original article,
transcript or broadcast within ten (10) days from the date of service of this notice.["] "Failure to publish such
a correction, apology, or retraction will result in the filing of a lawsuit and damages being sought against you, CNN," the
letter reads, detailing several examples of what Trump's team contends is defamation.
'Life
On Earth Is At Stake': CNN Correspondent Suggests Biden Use Military To Produce Electric Vehicles. CNN
correspondent Bill Weir suggested that the Biden administration mobilize the military to produce electric vehicles and
claimed "life on Earth was at stake" due to climate change on CNN Tuesday [7/26/2022]. Weir expressed frustration that
the filibuster was preventing Congress from passing legislation and that President Joe Biden was limited in his ability to
tackle climate change during his appearance on CNN. He suggested the nationalization of industries as one method to mitigate
the issue. [...] Biden announced executive actions to combat climate change Wednesday [7/20/2022], including funding for the
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to combat extreme heat along with efforts to lower the cost of cooling homes.
The Editor says...
How is FEMA expected "to combat extreme heat?"
Don
Lemon Throws a Hissy Fit, Demands Republicans Be Treated as 'Danger to Society'. The new leadership at CNN came
in declaring that they wanted to get away from the biased journalism that has been the hallmark of CNN for the past few
years. But it sounds like Don Lemon is throwing a bit of a fit over the concept of being an objective unbiased
journalist — something he doesn't exactly know how to be. He doesn't think it's right to be "fair" to
Republicans, because he believes that Republicans are such a danger to society. [Video clip]
Don
Lemon: 'We're Not Doing Our Jobs' if Media is Fair to GOP. Recently, CNN's New Day has been on a streak
of providing fairly objective reporting. Alas, it was a streak that Don Lemon decided to end this Thursday morning
[7/14/2022], ambling over from his nightly slots for what seemed to be a monthly Festivus tradition of his: complaining
that the media isn't doing enough to attack Republicans. Essentially openly opposing new CNN boss Chris Licht's
reported desire to bring CNN back to journalism and away from Lemon's brand of partisanship.
Stelter
Allows Former Ministry of Truth Head to Spread Disinformation. On Sunday's Reliable Sources on CNN, host
Brian Stelter spent the opening monologue of his show in a tizzy over the amount of disinformation on the internet and in
American politics in general. So naturally, Stelter decided to bring the former head of President Joe Biden's Ministry
of Truth Nina Jankowicz to help her rehabilitate her image. Perhaps unsurprisingly, Jankowicz spread disinformation
herself during the interview. Predictably, Stelter opened the segment by sucking up to her and failed to correct her on
any of her lies. [...] She purposefully lied about former President Trump's ties to the Russian Alfa Bank and that he had two
secret email servers to communicate with the Russians. Both claims were and are flat-out false. Screenshots are
forever, Nina! Of course, Stelter never confronted her about this either.
CNN:
Recessions Are Racist. The U.S. economy shrank worse than expected in the first quarter, stoking fears that we
are headed for recession, if not already in one. In fact, most Americans already believe we are in a recession.
And they're probably right. A recession is defined as two consecutive quarters with negative growth. However, as
CNN's Nicole Goodkind notes, "the economy isn't broadly and officially considered to be in a recession until a relatively
unknown group of eight economists says so." Goodkind then attempts to make this all sound
sinister — like it's a bunch of James Bond villains hiding in a secret lair plotting world domination by pointing
out that these economists "serve together as the Business Cycle Dating Committee, are hand-selected by and work under the
umbrella of the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), a private nonprofit organization." So, what exactly is CNN's
problem? Well, it seems all but inevitable that the Biden Recession will soon be official, so to preempt this, CNN has
declared this cabal of economists racist.
CNN
Peddles Debunked Cassidy Hutchinson's Narrative as 'a Bombshell'. The debunked Cassidy Hutchinson testimony,
spun before the partisan January 6 Committee on Tuesday, continued to be peddled by CNN on Wednesday as "a bombshell"
revelation. Aides to former President Donald Trump were left speechless amid the first half of Cassidy Hutchinson's
testimony on Tuesday, acknowledging to CNN that her testimony was 'a bombshell' with potentially huge repercussions for
Trump," Gabby Orr and Pamela Brown reported for CNN. But the credibility of Hutchinson's testimony imploded just hours
after the lead Secret Service agent in charge of former President Trump's security detail offered to contradict Hutchinson's
testimony under oath.
CNN
Caught Lying About Alex Jones While Covering For Drug Dealers. CNN aired a terribly produced hit piece where
they claim Alex Jones lied that law enforcement in Rockwall, Texas, were moonlighting as drug dealers. We then show
news footage from a 1989 KXAS-TV news package on indictments of the Rockwell County Sheriff and his chief deputy for stealing
drugs from the evidence room and selling those drugs. CNN and those that work with them are like new age Nazi
propagandists. [Video clip]
Jeffrey
Toobin argues, 'There's a lot of right-wing terrorism in this country,' ignores left-wing violence. CNN legal
analyst Jeffrey Toobin ignored recent examples of progressive violence when he went on "At This Hour With Kate Bolduan" on
Wednesday to condemn "the pervasiveness of right-wing violence." Toobin appeared on a panel discussing the ongoing Jan. 6
hearings and potential connections to former President Donald Trump. In the latest hearing by the Jan. 6 Committee on
Tuesday, state officials testified that they received several threats and attacks from people after refusing to overturn the
2020 election results. Toobin argued those threats were further proof that "right-wing violence" is now pervasive
throughout the country.
CNN
reporter defends Biden's mental strength, says the 'gears of his mind are working'. CNN correspondent John
Harwood defended President Biden against critics who have concerns over the president's age during a segment on Sunday's
"Reliable Sources." [...] CNN host Brian Stelter discussed how there is a growing concern among those in the media and
politics, that Biden may be too old to run for president for a second term. While Harwood agreed that Biden is old, he
said it was false that Biden is incapable of doing his job.
The
Daily Wire Produces A Savage Montage Of CNN Spreading Fake News. Ben Shapiro's The Daily Wire is just a few
years old, but they have already carved out a huge space in the conservative news niche for their powerful assault on
corporate media outlets of all kinds. Fox News has repeatedly proven itself to be a shill for Big Pharma and leftist
causes, and Newsmax has even sold out on Ukraine. Thankfully, and perhaps recognizing this void in real truth telling,
The Daily Wire has stepped up to the plate. [...] [T]he short clips come together with the perfectly-overlaid score to
produce a truly remarkable summary of CNN's specific, and corporate media's general, collapse. They simply cannot
report fairly, accurately, or honestly. [...] [T]he real reason for CNN's abysmal ratings is tied directly to their inability
to serve the public interest. When a lineup of Don Lemon, Chris Cuomo, Brian Stelter, and so many other hosts of
primetime slots can't hide their elitist and intellectual snobbery at regular Americans, and pass along hoaxes as real news,
abject failure is the only possible result.
CNN
Blames Republicans For Attempted Left-Wing Assassination Of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. CNN blamed
Republicans Wednesday for fostering the environment that reportedly led a California man to Justice Brett Kavanaugh's
Maryland home, confessing intent "to kill the Supreme Court justice" and carrying a gun and multiple other weapons and
burglary tools. According to an affidavit obtained by ABC News, the man was taken into custody after he was found with
a Glock handgun, ammunition, a knife, pepper spray, and various tools for forced entry. The affidavit also noted that
the man "told the detective that he was upset about the leak of a recent Supreme Court draft decision" regarding abortion,
one that could see Roe v. Wade overturned. He also said he was upset about "the recent school shooting
in Uvalde, Texas."
CNN
Denied Attempted Kavanaugh Assassin Was Armed, Cries 'Both Sides'. After taking over an hour to get to the
major breaking story of the day Wednesday [6/8/2022] — the attempted assassination of Supreme Court Justice Brett
Kavanaugh at his home earlier that morning — CNN's At This Hour tried to downplay the incident by
suggesting the man wasn't armed "at all" and tried to claim there were threats from "both sides" of the political
spectrum. Despite reports that the would-be assassin was armed with a gun, a knife, and pepper spray, and was angered
by the leaked draft decision that could overturn Roe v. Wade, CNN law enforcement correspondent Whitney Wild
tried to downplay the entire situation, even denying he had any weapons on him.
CNN's Farce of an "Investigation".
CNN's "investigation" of the death of Al Jazeera reporter Shireen Abu Akleh did not, as it claims, show that Israeli forces
intentionally murdered her. Instead, CNN only showed the world how far the news company has fallen from serious
journalism. CNN's incendiary accusation that Israel intentionally killed Abu Akleh builds assumptions on top of
assumptions. It relies not so much on objective, incontrovertible evidence, but on the feelings of biased
eyewitnesses. All the while, plausible alternative explanations are not only cast aside, but effectively covered up
by CNN's reporting. These are the acts of a partisan organization, not a serious news agency.
CNN
Overstates Public Risk of Monkeypox, Repeats Biden Lies. CNN wants you to be as afraid of monkeypox as you were
of COVID, and we all need to panic. Biden said everyone should be aware of monkeypox, so the media uncritically reports
the same. But the threat patterns are not the same for the general public, just as they weren't for COVID which preyed
on obese elderly patients. Monkeypox, by comparison, seems to prey on gay men engaged in high-risk sexual
activity. You would never know that by reading CNN though.
CNN's
Eye is on the Sparrow. [Scroll down] For those whose local press is as focused on nonsense as CNN, let me
recap the significance of this week's proceedings instituted by special counsel John Durham after a lengthy investigation
into the origins of the Russian hoax, which was generated and promoted by Hillary Clinton to advance her election and which,
after she lost, served to tie up President Trump and his administration with investigations and impeachments. The
indictment was a detailed 26-page outline indictment of the case which is now ongoing. It is precise and
limited — Sussman is accused of lying to the FBI's General Counsel in September 2016 when he asserted that he was
not representing a client at the time he claimed that Russia's Alfa Bank was a direct conduit between the Trump campaign and
the Kremlin.
CNN
Spins 'Right-Wing' Violence Narrative As Abortion Activists Rage Nationwide. Corporate media outlets, including
CNN, are spreading concern that "far-right" extremists will commit violence due to the reportedly pending Supreme Court
decision to undo Roe vs. Wade, even as pro-abortion activists take to the streets and are causing unrest across the
country. A CNN report released Friday cited a U.S. Capitol Police alert warning of "far-right calls for violence"
against a religious group planning a pro-abortion protest at the Supreme Court. Beyond this single alert, CNN did not
cite any further specific threat posed by right-wing extremists related to the reported decision to overturn Roe vs. Wade.
CNN claims
Normal Weather Is A Climate Crisis. "Temperatures in parts of India and Pakistan have reached record levels,
putting the lives of millions at risk as the effects of the climate crisis are felt across the subcontinent. The
heatwave has also been felt by India's neighbor Pakistan, where the cities of Jacobabad and Sibi in the country's
southeastern Sindh province recorded highs of 47 degrees Celsius (116.6 Fahrenheit) on Friday" [This is
followed by numerous newspaper reports from decades ago, showing that brutally hot weather is normal in India.]
In
A Week Full Of Stupidity, CNN Is The Stupidest. It's not unusual to see gaslighting from the left-wing media,
but this report from CNN has taken the phenomenon to new levels. There are plenty of safety concerns regarding the
leak, and there have been plenty of death threats, but they have all been against the presumed justices who are apparently
prepared to rule in favor of overturning Roe V Wade. [...] Because you see, when radicals on the right make threats or get
carried away with a protest, that amounts to an "insurrection" and the left forms committees and tries to make the midterm
elections about the atrociousness of it. But when leftists threaten to kill Supreme Court justices, leak confidential
documents with the expressed intent of intimidating the justices' rulings, and then attempt to instill fear in those justices
with violent protests in the streets, that's all fine and dandy. This is how it works in American politics nowadays,
which explains why the Democrats and their media ignored the violence.
CNN:
Capitol Police 'Warning the Far Right Is Calling for Violence' after Supreme Court Leak. On Friday's [5/6/2022]
"CNN Newsroom," co-host and Chief National Security Correspondent Jim Sciutto reported that after the leak of the Supreme
Court's draft opinion on Roe v. Wade, "Capitol Police are warning the far right is calling for violence against a
religious group planning to rally for abortion rights." Sciutto stated, "This morning, law enforcement officials are
preparing for potential violence in the capital and nationwide after the leak of that Supreme Court draft opinion that would
strike down Roe v. Wade after 50 years. Capitol Police are warning the far right is calling for violence
against a religious group planning to rally for abortion rights."
CNN
Sees Biden's Political Troubles as Nearly Unfixable. To hear Democrats today, outrage over the possible
overturning of Roe v. Wade will cause a blue wave this November. It's an amusing theory that doesn't
quite hold up under scrutiny. Even Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.V.) pointed out earlier this week that abortion is by no
means the number one issue in his state. "Inflation is the number one driving factor I believe in my state. Right
now, it's hurting everybody, not just at the pump, but at the grocery store, at the drug store, at the pharmaceutical.
Everything they do," he explained. Joe Biden's cheerleaders at CNN seem to agree.
CNN
Is In Complete Freefall. CNN lost its credibility years ago, going back to at least the Obama Administration,
but probably even earlier. But during the Bush and Obama years, there was a lingering sense of trust for some
Americans, allowing CNN to keep its audience to weak but respectable levels. When Donald Trump arrived on the scene in
2015, CNN and every other mainstream media outlet promoted and then exploited Trump Derangement Syndrome to the point that
anyone afflicted with TDS was tuning in constantly to learn about how "the walls are closing in" with the outlandish Russia
Hoax. But Trump is no longer in the White House, having been replaced by a complete buffoon that they — the
left and their media — propped up. CNN had already been exposed as frauds with their years of dishing out
fake news. They followed up that credibility crisis with a series of recent scandals, [...]
CNN's
Harwood: Not a 'pretty picture... but so far zero evidence' Biden did anything wrong related to Hunter.
The mainstream liberal media must perhaps be getting worried about the repercussions of the ongoing U.S. Department of
Justice investigation into the Hunter Biden laptop scandal and related allegations of influence pedaling. Big Tech and
the corporate media censored or sought to discredit the story, a scoop by the New York Post, during the 2020 election cycle
because they apparently perceived that it would harm candidate Joe Biden and Democrats generally. As the scandal gains
further traction, however, journalists, or those perhaps more accurately described as publicists, now appear to be circling
the wagons around the Biden administration. In the clip embedded above, CNN White House correspondent John Harwood, for
example, served up a helping of word salad on the ratings-challenged network that President Donald J. Trump memorably
labeled as "very fake news."
CNN's
spin-machine sputters trying to downplay Biden's gaffes, cover 'incredibly successful week'. If CNN was capable
of describing itself honestly, the best definition would be that it's a word-laundering spin machine for the Democrats and
President Joe Biden. On the heels of Biden's tour of Europe, the White House has scrambled — as it seemingly
must every single day — to mend the latest series of gaffes spilling forth from Joe Biden's incongruous and
unfiltered manner of speech, and ever-devoted CNN was there to bat cleanup for the regime. The pundits of "New Day"
discussed Biden's recent statement that Russian President Vladimir Putin "cannot remain in power" on Monday's show, with
senior political analyst John Avlon providing cover and referring to Biden's statement as "a mistake to the extent that it is
a gaffe" and merely an "outburst."
Meltdown:
CNN's Brian Stelter Refuses to Walk Back His False Claims Hunter Biden's Laptop Emails Were 'Russian
Disinformation'. CNN anchor Brian Stelter on Friday refused to walk back inaccurate claims he promoted on his
program when he claimed Hunter Biden's "laptop from hell" emails were "Russian disinformation." "Hey, just curious, when
did I claim 'Hunter Biden's laptop emails were likely Russian propaganda'? Can you send me the quote?" he sent in a direct
message on Twitter to this reporter, a reference to a Thursday Breitbart News article in which he was listed along with 14 others
in establishment media for falsely suggesting the laptop was Russian propaganda and disinformation. In response, Stelter was
asked if he stood by the inaccurate claims he made on his show where he suggested the Hunter Biden emails may have been
"made up" and could have been "Russian disinformation," or if he was planning to retract the inaccurate comments.
Chris
Cuomo's $125M CNN Lawsuit Contains Stunning Corruption Allegations. [Scroll down] And I believe every
word of it. In fact, for years and years, I've been telling you this kind of stuff was going on at CNN. And let's
not forget that this stuff shows that everyone at CNN is ethically compromised. They're all guilty, every single one of
them. They're all corrupt and tarnished and dishonest hacks and liars. Now, this doesn't mean I'm siding with
Chris Cuomo. Not at all. For this and a half dozen other flagrant ethical violations, including staging a fake
video where he supposedly reemerged from a basement quarantine, this guy was bad news from day one. The problem for
CNN, though, is that it might very well be vulnerable on the issue of selective enforcement of an ethical code it never
had. Also, if this thing goes to court and depositions are taken under oath... Oh, boy!
Wyoming
GOP Would Like a Word After CNN Claims 'Influential' People Back Liz Cheney. Ah, liberal media —
their delusion is something else sometimes and chief among them are the Democratic apologists over at CNN. CNN had a
piece on Monday telling us how all the "influential" Republicans are rushing to support Rep. Liz Cheney (RINO-WY) in her
race in November. That there are so "many" that a fundraiser for Monday [3/14/2022] had to cap its guest list at 75.
That would be about the number of folks in the line at the bathroom for a Trump rally among the thousands, and several of
those 75 are Cheney family members. So who are some of those "influential" Republicans who are going to somehow
revitalize Cheney in Wyoming? People from the "orbits" of Sen. Mitt Romney and the Bushes. Romney is the
event's "special guest."
CNN
[has been] Forced to Admit Left-Wing Bias [is] Killing [its] Ratings. CNN, a left-wing, basement-rated
misinformation machine that spreads conspiracy theories and violence, is now admitting its blatant partisanship has damaged
its ratings and credibility. [...] Chris Licht is the former showrunner of — get this — The Late
Show with Stephen Colbert. So the very idea Licht will 1) give people on the right anything close to a fair hearing
is not going to happen and 2) there's just no getting around the fact that people who come from Licht's bubbled world tend
not to know what "objectivity," "truth," and "professionalism" really are. Like all the others, Licht will be concerned
only with one thing: status within the bubble, which means CNN will only get a little less worse.
CNN
Journalists Magically Appear Right Where Russian's are Airdropping, Get Completely Left Alone by Russian Troops. It's
almost like CNN has a Russian insider who is working with the Commie News Network, aka CNN aka Very Fake News. It's very rare
for mainstream media outlets to allow their people out in the warzone unless they're embedded with military units. It's also
very rare that Russian troops don't shoot or arrest people recording them doing their dirty deeds. Something just doesn't seem
right. [Video clip]
A
Noticeable Shift Is Seen as CNN Pulls Back From Tilting at a Favorite Windmill. The one-time leader and sole
creator of 24-hour cable news outlet, CNN has fallen in recent years — and not just on hard times. It is
amazing to sit back and consider that the channel that quite literally revolutionized broadcast journalism has been reduced
to less than a competitor — to a distant also-ran in the ratings. It has been years now since the channel
has sunk to Hallmark Channel-levels in the ratings, and the recent spate of scandals has compounded the trauma. One of
the ironies seen from Jeff Zucker's outlet is the perpetual whining taking place about how Fox News is not a valid news network.
CNN
Wants To Know: 'How Stupid Do You Think We Are?' [Scroll down] Note first that [Erin] Burnett does not
identify this "GOP senator". The source is anonymous and, therefore, insignificant. Second, and even more
telling, note that Burnett does not say that this GOP senator was present at the meeting but only that they are
"familiar with the matter". That is what is known in critical reasoning texts as "weasel words." The expression
"familiar with the matter" is vague enough to include people with no direct knowledge of the events. That is, this
anonymous alleged GOP senator may be relaying a conversation they had in a hallway, not something they witnessed
themselves. Even though Burnett has no identifiable source for her assertions, she sanctimoniously asks, "Why
would two sitting GOP senators 'cover' for the President when so many people know the truth. All we can say is this,
they're not alone in lying and yes we can use that word." Burnett is right that she can use the word "lying" but she has not
shown that she can justifiably use it. The word "can" has that useful, for sophists, ambiguity or equivocation.
CNN's
Brianna Keiler, Gov. Gretchen Whitmer Blame 'Right Wing Media' for Freedom Convoy Protest. I've written
how liberals like Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Ottawa city councilor Diane Deans have been trying to blame
Americans for the protests in Canada. After trying to smear their fellow Canadians as racists, they've now moved on to
suggest that it's Americans behind it all, to negate the opinion of their fellow Canadians and deny that yes, it's Canadians
who are doing this. Both CNN and Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer are now taking that a step further, and trying to
blame "right-wing media." "Right-wing media is really fueling it," CNN's Brianna Keiler claimed.
Not
Just CNN: Mainstream Media Is on the Ropes. I'm not just talking about NBC's pathetic coverage of the Beijing
Olympics that nobody is watching, though that's an indication. Nor am I talking about the well-known polling that rates
the media's popularity somewhere below Congress, if such a thing were possible. That's been going on for a while.
It's more. Let's take a tour d'horizon, but first... CNN. A widely discussed article by media critic Joe Concha
concludes: "The collapse of CNN is now complete: 9 out of 10 viewers, gone. Its top-rated anchor, Chris Cuomo,
gone. Its network president, gone. Its integrity in shambles. "Oh, and new management coming in that is signaling
big-time changes — changes that may bring CNN back to the proud network it once was before [network President] Jeff Zucker
destroyed it." True enough, but should CNN be brought back? A company that deliberately downplayed the atrocities committed
by Saddam Hussein's regime (they even admitted it) in order to maintain their exclusive access to that same regime should have vanished
years ago. We would have been spared all the endless Trump-Russia lies.
The
Washington Post Throws Shade on a Major CNN 'Scoop' About Intercepted Russian Communications and Rightfully So.
On Monday [2/7/2022], CNN's crack foreign policy team of Natasha "Fusion" Bertrand, Jim Sciutto, and Katie Bo Lillis broke an
exclusive on Ukraine US intel indicates Russian officers have had doubts about full scale Ukraine invasion. What the
story purports to show are senior Russian officers dishing over how messed up an invasion of Ukraine would be, how badly they
might get [beaten], and how [bad] they feel about their carefully plotted "false flag" attack being publicly revealed. [...]
If true, the story could be significant. It shows some reluctance by Russian officers to take part in a "minor
incursion" into Ukraine and would indicate that the whole plan to do so, to the extent that one exists, has raised doubts and
concerns. Did I already say "if true?" There are a lot of reasons to doubt this story. First and foremost, the
sourcing is so skeevy as to scream, "don't believe this [...]." Second, two of the biggest tools at the Home Depot that is
CNN, contributed to this report. Third, the information in the story would be highly compartmentalized, and leaking it
would set off a major counterintelligence review by the FSB. [...] Lastly, no other news outlet has done its own reporting on
the story. The only instances where this story appears on Google are in outlets that credit the story to CNN. How
often does that happen? How often does any outlet get a major scoop that absolutely no one of significance comments
on or can move the story forward with its own reporting?
CNN:
A fallen idol, a suppurating stew of bawl-babies, and high-school schemers. It's been nearly a week since CNN's
top executive, Jeff Zucker, got the boot, supposedly over a longtime affair with a subordinate, and the bawling through the
ranks hasn't stopped. [...] Obviously, this guy Zucker, the big fallen Goomba-Goomba cult idol, wasn't this bottom-ranked
network's boss or leader; he was really their best friend forever. [...] That explains a lot about their strange coverage
over the past few years — the Russia hoax, the Trump impeachment, the false attack on the Covington kids, the
"fiery but peaceful" protests, and other insane left-wingery that could not by any standard be called "journalism."
It was all Zucker whispering into his suggestible little minions' ears about what kind of left-wing narrative he wanted to
project and watching them "go fetch" for him like the dogs they are. The whole network was truly his, and these
characters were his arms.
Chris
Cuomo wants as much as $60 million from CNN amid Jeff Zucker exit. Chris Cuomo isn't backing down in his battle
with CNN following the ouster of his boss Jeff Zucker — the anchor intends to demand as much as a $60 million
settlement, according to sources. Multiple sources tell Page Six that Cuomo, who was fired in December for helping his
brother fend off sexual harassment allegations, is ready to dig his heels in by claiming that Zucker not only knew about his
dealings with the governor — but that the network boss had his own inappropriate dealings with Andrew. And
he is prepared to demand not the $18 million left on his contract, but as much as $60 million. "He wants Megyn
Kelly money," we're told. One source said: "Chris insists he never did anything for his brother Andrew that Zucker
didn't know about. [...]"
CNN's collapse
is now complete. [Scroll past the history of CNN.] In the spring of 2020, the country was in a horrific
place. Businesses shut completely; people were scared. There were no COVID-19 therapeutics, no vaccines.
Hospitals were overwhelmed, thousands were dying each day. If ever there was a time for news organizations to educate
and inform the public, this was it. Instead, Zucker apparently believed it was the perfect time to exploit the
situation for political gain and to help the network's ratings. Andrew Cuomo benefited from briefings that made him
appear to be the adult in the room regarding COVID-19 and Trump appear to be the villain. Cuomo got a $5.1 million
book deal as a result. Chris Cuomo and Zucker/Gollust/CNN benefited from marathon interviews with Cuomo's governor/brother,
which didn't touch the governor's alleged nursing home scandal. Ratings soared.
CNN
Continues to Collude With the J-6 Commission and Expose Itself as the Hack News Outlet. As CNN continues to
reel from the departure of Jeff Zucker, the network is also continuing with another practice — serving as the
accomplice with members of the January Six Commission investigating the Capitol Riot. One of the unintended offshoots
of the Zucker debacle was a curious admission made by one of the network's entrenched Washington fixtures, correspondent
Jamie Gangel, immediately after his firing. Gangel let slip that members of Congress had reached out to her to express
their dismay at Zucker's demise.
Compilation
of Proven Lies By Fake-News Channel CNN Over the Years Proves they're not to be Trusted. CNN has proven to be
nothing more than an arm of the Democrat party. Here is just a smidgen of the total BS they have been spewing over the
past couple years that turned out to be completely false. Then they have the audacity to claim they're unbiased.
Anyone who thinks that is either brainwashed or dumb. [Video clip]
Discovery
CEO: Hey, I had nothing to do with Zucker's termination from CNN. Discovery CEO David Zaslav is doing some
explaining of the latest news reports coming out of CNN's Jeff Zucker's exit. Zaslav says he had nothing to do with it,
contrary to reports. Also, when he called CNN 'the leader of news to the left', he meant "the 'left' side of the
company portfolio, with sports being on the 'right'." Got it. Zaslav sees the news on the left and sports on the
right. Sadly, we know that even sports can't be characterized as more conservative than news, in general, these days
with political activism so regularly easing into sports reporting. We can understand his distinction, though, even if
it seems a little wishful in logic.
CNN: The Future of Fake
News. CNN is dying. Its president, Jeff Zucker, was just fired. (Or, rather, he "resigned.") The
network's viewership is plummeting, and fewer than 500,000 people on average tuned in last month. Advertisers don't
send their dollars there much anymore, and the "stars" the network once had either have been removed for cause or caught up
in sex or other scandals. Chris "Fredo" Cuomo threatened to burn the place down after getting fired last year.
Why does the parent company — AT&T, a telephone megacompany — put up with it? CNN is a drag on
the parent company's earnings, a thorn in its side, and a hit on its reputation. Wouldn't a rational actor cancel the
network altogether or sell it off and be done with it? With $150 billion in debt, no wonder AT&T decided to sell the
ailing network to the Discovery Network. AT&T will no doubt benefit from getting out of politics.
CNN
Admits Live On Air That Their Fact-Checking Is Based On Typing Words Into Google. These geniuses at CNN, who
have been wondering out loud how they lost 90% of their audience, admitted live on air that to debunk misinformation, they
type words into Google. The panel was talking about Senator Ron Johnson's hearing on vaccine safety when the topic of
over 100 pro athletes dying of sudden heart attacks was discussed. This greatly upset the panel at CNN where one of the
'investigative reporters' admitted he typed what was said into Google and it came back as misinformation. [Video clip]
CNN
Pushing Fake U.S. Intel Reports of Russians Stockpiling Blood on Ukraine Border, Ukranian Government Furious With DC
Propaganda. Always remember, CNN is the official "fake news" narrative engineering effort of the U.S. State
Department. The Washington Post pushes the Intelligence Community effort (CIA, etc.), and the New York Times push the
FBI/DOJ (state police) effort. Today in an effort to use Ukraine as a proxy state for war against Russia, the State
Dept and CIA are claiming the Russians are amassing massive stockpiles of blood at the Ukraine border as they prepare for a
protracted war. In response the Ukraine government tells the Biden crew to knock it off with the nonsense. This
puts CNN journalists in Ukraine telling CNN journalists in the U.S. to stop telling 'fake news'.
CNN
Tanking: Six Reasons For Its Failures. During the Gulf War in 1991, CNN shone like no other news network
before. Their access to official military footage, embedded reporters, and around-the-clock coverage of the conflict
reset the standard for war reporting, and we all tuned into the network to watch America kick the crap out of Saddam
Hussein. It was at this time that CNN's slogan of "The most trusted name in news" might have been accurate. But
not anymore. CNN's credibility is a joke, and their ratings are 'exhibit A' for that assertion. No one is
watching CNN anymore because no one believes a word that they say. During the first week of this year, CNN's ratings
were down by as much as 90% over last year in both overall viewership and in key demographics. When nine out of ten
viewers just stop tuning in, those numbers don't just represent a sharp drop, they represent an absolute freefall. When
CNN reported on the Gulf War, and the Bush-41 and Clinton Administrations, they were at least somewhat objective. With
Bush-43, they began to lift their skirt on their bias as they were often unfair in their coverage. [...] Obama was
incompetent, and his administration was rife with scandal, but CNN spent eight years stroking their beloved hero. Their
clapping seals on the left ate it up, but America's moderates and conservatives saw through CNN's sycophancy. And now
that credibility crisis has reached critical mass.
CNN's
1/6 Special: Fox News 'Relishing the Idea' of a Civil War. For years now, the liberal media have been
telling us the country is in a "cold civil war" or a "neo-civil war" because people and policies they don't like have
popularity. But according to CNN's Anderson Cooper during the network's January 6 primetime special (Live From the
Capitol: January 6th, One Year Later) it was the folks at "other networks" — aka Fox News —
that were "relishing the idea" of sparking another civil war in America. Cooper's grotesque comment came during a
conversation with his panel of all Democratic members of Congress, but was specifically directed at Representatives Jason
Crow (D-CO) and Ruben Gallego (D-AZ) because they both had served overseas (Crow was a captain in Army and Gallego was a
corporal in the Marines).
Progressives
Finally Realize That Covid Is Not a 'Moral Failing'. Earlier this week, CNN's Chris Cillizza lamented that,
throughout the pandemic, "Societally we unknowingly turned having Covid into some sort of judgment on your character." To
remedy this, Cillizza suggested, "We need to recognize that getting Covid isn't a moral failing! It's a super
infectious disease that you can protect against, sure, but can't guarantee you won't get it." "Unknowingly"? "We
need to recognize"? "Societally"? Does Chris Cillizza live in a sensory-deprivation tank? There has been
nothing "unknowing" about the implication that catching Covid is evidence of a "moral failing." It has been the core of
the progressive response to the disease. We see it every time that someone who disagrees with the maximalist approach
to lockdowns, restrictions, or mandates is labeled a "Covidiot." We see it every time the governor of Florida is
described stupidly as "DeathSantis," or the governor of Texas is accused of belonging to a "death cult," or any politician or
writer with a different risk calculus than Anthony Fauci is charged with wanting "to kill grandma."
Fake
News CNN Reported First Omicron Death In Texas, But Hospital Says [it's] Not True. Earlier this week CNN
falsely reported that an unvaccinated Texas Man became the first American to die from the Omicron variant.
Unfortunately, it appears the Fake News network reported false information again, which in this case, has caused a lot of
Americans undue stress as families are scheduled to celebrate Christmas together. Health authorities in Texas are
rejecting the story, saying instead the man died with, not because of the COVID variant. According to The Blaze, Harris
County, public health officials did not say that the patient died from the Omicron variant of COVID. Rather, he died after
testing positive for the Omicron variant.
Cracked Icons. [Scroll down]
Think too of the now feet-of-clay, disgraced Cuomo brothers. These were the media darlings who hammed it up on
television — as thousands of New Yorkers unnecessarily died in long-term care facilities due to Governor Andrew
Cuomo's decision to redirect COVID-19 patients to share facilities with the elderly and infirm. [...] His brother Chris Cuomo
should have been dismissed from CNN long ago. He likely staged a fake video showing his emergence from his COVID
"quarantine" — given witnesses had seen him up and about earlier in public while infectious. He lied on air,
in denying his role as a journalist-cum-political advisor, in devising ways to use his media arrogance and contacts to save
his brother's hide. And he too was hit with sexual harassment charges. Both shared a conviction that as leftists
they enjoyed nine lives of corruption and deceit — until they ran out.
Chris
Cuomo's CNN producer charged with luring girls for 'sexual' training. A veteran CNN producer who worked
"shoulder to shoulder" with now disgraced ex-anchor Chris Cuomo has been indicted on charges of luring young girls to his
Vermont ski house for "sexual subservience" training. John Griffin, of Stamford, CT, allegedly used messaging apps to
befriend and persuade moms of young girls, telling them "a woman is a woman regardless of her age," and that he should be the
one to "train" their daughters sexually, according to the indictment from the US Attorney of Vermont. Griffin, 44,
allegedly got at least one mom of two daughters to bring the girl to his Ludlow ski getaway, in June 2020. It was the mom's
responsibility to see that her older daughter, just 13, was "trained properly," Griffin told her, according to the indictment.
Jeff
Zucker Failed To Address Serial Sexual Misconduct At CNN And Should Be Fired Immediately. In a move more
typically associated with shady politicians than a news network supposedly committed to transparency, CNN had a whopper of a
news dump on Saturday night, announcing it was firing primetime news anchor Chris Cuomo. This followed a weeklong
suspension after government documents proved his involvement in covering up the sexual misconduct of his brother, disgraced
former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, was much more extensive than previously known. The emails and text exchanges released by
the New York attorney general's office showed Chris Cuomo not only assisted with the public relations strategy to help his
brother evade accountability, but used his relationships in the media at outlets like MSNBC and Politico — that he
had gained from his job at CNN — to help him do it. Even more shocking, it was revealed that Chris Cuomo
asked for their help in digging up dirt on one survivor of his brother's sexual abuse. Also, since Chris Cuomo's
firing, at least one woman has come forward accusing Chris Cuomo himself of sexual harassment.
Good riddance
to Chris Cuomo. CNN fired Chris Cuomo this weekend. [...] CNN should have canned the younger, dumber Cuomo
years ago for being an unethical, loudmouthed dimwit. That CNN eventually fired him doesn't erase the fact it held on
to him for as long as it did. Cuomo was let go Saturday after it was revealed he had lied about the extent to which he
worked behind the scenes to shield his brother, disgraced former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, from multiple allegations
of sexual misconduct. In an effort to keep the then-governor one step ahead of the scandal, the younger Cuomo leaned on
his journalism connections and sources, funneling information from outside sources, including, apparently, other reporters,
to warn his brother ahead of time about new allegations and developments.
The
Chris Cuomo Saga Is Far From Over. As I was waiting for my flight to be de-iced Saturday [12/4/2021] before
takeoff, a few folks texted me that CNN had terminated Chris Cuomo's employment, converting his suspension into a permanent
arrangement. [...] If CNN wants to uphold its dwindling integrity as a news outlet, they should explain what they knew, when
they knew it, and, most importantly, why they pretended not to know it. I doubt we'll find out any time soon. CNN
will set the terms and limits of the investigation, and has it not even released the name of the law firm conducting the
investigation. To an outsider observer, it seems CNN had to first suspend and then terminate Chris Cuomo, mainly to
keep up its appearance as a legitimate news outlet and its undying service to the Democratic Party. That doesn't make
it much of a news network.
CNN fires Chris
Cuomo. CNN said Saturday [12/4/2021] that anchor Chris Cuomo has been "terminated" by the network, "effective
immediately." The announcement came after an outside law firm was retained to review information about exactly how Cuomo
aided his brother, former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, when the then-governor was accused of sexual harassment.
Fredo
Achieves What We All Thought Was Impossible: A CNN Suspension. To fully appreciate how much of a
knucklehead one must be in order to be suspended from CNN, consider those who have not received such discipline. Don
Lemon has been accused of sexual assault and spent the better part of three years making crap up with the Russia Hoax, yet he
hasn't been suspended. Brian Stelter makes a fool of himself at every opportunity and has lower ratings than reruns of
Green Acres, yet he hasn't been suspended. And Jim Acosta had his press credentials taken away after brushing aside a
White House staff member who tried to take back her microphone, yet Acosta was never suspended. Even CNN Legal Analyst
Jeffrey "Loobin" Toobin wasn't suspended last year after having been caught [misbehaving] on a Zoom call with colleagues from
The New Yorker.
Hysterical
Media Members Accuse Ron DeSantis of Building His Own 'Militia' to Prepare for 'Civil War'. Fresh hysteria is
emanating from the left after accusations that Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida is starting his own "militia" circulated
this morning. The claim originated from CNN (shocked face) via an article entitled "DeSantis Proposes a New Civilian
Military Force in Florida That He Would Control." It includes a picture of DeSantis partially overlaid on a picture of Donald
Trump. In short, we all know what CNN is insinuating here. [...] Mission accomplished for CNN, but buried deep in their
article is the actual truth of what DeSantis is wanting to do. If you go down to paragraph 8, you'll see that not only
is this not some civil war militia force, but it's actually something that New York, California, and 20 other states already have.
CNN
indefinitely suspends Chris Cuomo over damning AG documents. CNN "indefinitely" suspended host Chris Cuomo on
Tuesday over his secret role in trying to defend his brother, then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo, from the sexual harassment
allegations that forced him from office — and for using his journalistic resources to aid that effort. The
move came a day after state Attorney General Letitia James released a trove of subpoenaed records that include texts showing
the "Cuomo Prime Time" star agreed to contact news industry "sources" for advance information on damaging reports regarding
his older brother. In a prepared statement, CNN said the material "shed new light on Chris Cuomo's involvement in his
brother's defense." "The documents, which we were not privy to before their public release, raise serious questions,"
the network said.
Chris
Cuomo Texts Show He Was Running Strategy for Big Brother's Sex Scandal. Chris Cuomo, who repeatedly said he was
not helping his brother, Gov. Andrew Cuomo, with sex allegations, was indeed helping him fight the women who came
forward. Text messages released by the New York Attorney General's office show CNN's Cuomo texting with the governor's
top aide, Melissa DeRosa — a woman he said he was not regularly in touch with. Pages of texts show
differently. Further, CNN supposedly banned Cuomo from helping his brother with the allegations.
Is
Fredo Cuomo about to get whacked at CNN? Chris "Fredo" Cuomo is one of the pampered princes at CNN whose
usefulness to the network was pretty much nil after his bigger brother, Andrew Cuomo, the governor of New York, went down in
disgrace. Now it comes to light that he was engaged in some despicable conflict-of-interest behavior that, as Rolling
Stone noted, "would get any other journalist fired." [...] And this is far from all he did as Gov. Sonny's personal
public relations handler on the sly. Rolling Stone also reports that he helped craft statements, advised his brother to
dig in instead of get out, and couldn't stop repeatedly lying about it, both to his CNN listeners and apparently, to his CNN
bosses, although that's kind of uncertain. Note that Fredo-like plea in the passage above to the big guys to "trust"
him. What we do see now is that CNN, or at least some people there, are trying to pitch him over the side.
CNN
Reports Cars Have Advanced From Looting to Terrorism and Murder. Last week NBC and California media reported
that cars were responsible for looting and general mayhem in/around the San Francisco shopping districts. "Just before
9 p.m. dozens of cars pulled up to 1200 Broadway Plaza to block off the street and rush into store." "About 25 cars
just blocked the street and rushed into the Walnut Creek Nordstrom making off with goods before getting in cars and speeding away,"
Hernandez said on Twitter. Today, CNN announces that cars have become even more violent: "Waukesha will hold a moment
of silence ... one week since a car drove through a city Christmas parade".
CNN
Analyst Has 'No Idea' What's Behind 'Smash and Grab' Robberies — Then Gives up the Answer. A CNN
analyst — a former Philadelphia police commissioner and CNN senior law enforcement analyst, no less —
serves up a perfect example of why CNN's ratings continue to swirl down the toilet at breakneck speed. Simply put,
can't make it up; don't have to. And the best part is they totally don't get it. Or do they? [...] As we've
reported, flash-mob robberies, so-called "smash and grabs," which are rampant [...] in many Democrat-run cities across
America, have become all the rage. As is the case with any important issue facing the country, the key question is why
are they occurring and what do have to do to stop them? In what can only be described as "the genius of CNN," the
above-mentioned analyst, Charles Ramsey, has pondered the same question. While the former police commissioner and law
enforcement analyst claims to have "no idea" why the wave of robberies continues to occur (utter nonsense; of course he knows
exactly why the robberies continue to occur), he did manage to provide the answer while pretending to be clueless.
CNN
Is Lightening The Skin Color Of Waukesha Terrorist Darrell Brooks. A driver who plowed an SUV into the
Waukesha, WI Christmas Parade killing 5 and injuring 40 on Sunday evening has been identified as Darrell Edward,
Brooks. Age 39. [...] However, the mainstream media is trying to cover up for Darrell as they call the attack
an accident and they are alleging that he was running away from a knife attack! We all know that's not true but CNN
tried to do the impossible, they even tried to make Brooks look like he has a lighter skin color! Here's the CNN image
which is lighter than any other image on the internet: [Photo]
CNN
Flip Flopped on A Ridiculous Amount of Lies they Spewed About Kyle Rittenhouse, Saving Face? Just two minutes
after the Kyle Rittenhouse trial ended CNN ran a video admitting a lot of the claims they made over the last year were in
fact completely wrong. Listen as this news reporter goes through a long list of things CNN once claimed were wrong are
now proven to be 100% accurate. CNN even lists several things they themselves made up were in fact wrong.
[Video clip]
Alan
Dershowitz Offers To Help Kyle Rittenhouse Sue The Living Daylights Out Of CNN. On Friday evening [11/19/2021],
Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz offered his own personal research of CNN's slanderous coverage of Kyle Rittenhouse so
the 18-year old can pursue legal action against them. [...] "They heard a case of white supremacists crossing state lines
with an AR-15 who had no business being in the place that he went to. He was not chased and had no fear for his
life. That's what CNN told their viewers. I hope that Rittenhouse sues CNN," he continued. "I will make an
offer. I will share my research about CNN with Rittenhouse and his lawyers. I am suing CNN because they totally
distorted and edited a tape of my defense of President Trump. They have a history of distorting facts to present a
narrative. I think that you have to distinguish between opinions and facts. You can't see somebody for calling
Rittenhouse a vigilante. That's an opinion. You can sue them for saying he crossed state lines with an illegal
weapon or he was a white supremacist. I am a strong supporter of the First Amendment that CNN and others have to be
held accountable for lying about individuals and creating an expectation of a conviction in a case where there was no
possibility of a conviction for anybody who saw the trial live on television,"he added.
Network
anchor laughably tweets photo of supermarket milk aisle as proof supply chain is fine. Supply chain problems?
What supply chain problems? Brian Stelter's milk aisle is fine, after all. That's seriously the take the host of CNN's
"Reliable Sources" had. In a Saturday tweet, Stelter tried to convince social media users our supply chain was in great
shape all because there was plenty of milk at his local Wegmans. The roundly mocked tweet featured a picture of what
appeared to be Stelter's wife looking through the refrigerated section at the supermarket.
CNN
Has an Unbelievable Take on Your Basic Right to Defend Yourself. We've seen a lot of bad media takes when it
comes to the Rittenhouse case but we can always count on CNN to deliver some more. This segment with John Berman,
Brianna Keilar, and Don Lemon is something else. [Video clip] Keilar talks about "white vigilantism" and
compares the Rittenhouse case to the Ahmaud Arbery case. This is offensive because the Rittenhouse case has nothing to
do with race and nothing to do with the Ahmaud Arbery case. Comparing the two and talking about vigilantism is an
indication that Keilar has no idea about the facts in this case. But what is the big offense that Kyle Rittenhouse
committed in the left's mind besides shooting people? It's that he dared to help people defend their property.
Senator
Rick Scott destroys a CNN Host with Facts she Can't Rebuke. CNN along with many in the leftist media continue
to gaslight American's by telling them Critical Race Theory aka CRT is not being taught in schools. The only problem
for them is a plethora of parents nationwide who have the proof directly from their sons and daughters homework that shows it
is much more prevalent than they would like us to believe. Watch as Senator Rick Scott uses Biden's own website in
order to combat the fact that CRT is not only being taught, but that CNN along with their leftist cohorts in the media, are
either lying about it not being taught, or completely clueless as to what is really going on. Either way, it was a bad
day for CNN's Brianna Keilar. [Video clip]
Boston
Bombing Scripted Actor turns out to be CNN's favorite so-called Covid "expert" Dr. Leana Wen (opinion).
Acting involves the ability to enter into another character, memorize lines, show confidence while the camera is rolling, and
use dramatic "techniques" to engage with an audience. Recall back in April of 2013, when the Boston Marathon bombing
occurred, crisis actor videos went viral, and the acting of many players was so bad that many Americans began questioning if
the news media were lying, just as a government-run litmus test for martial law in the suburbs of Boston was being rolled
out. Guess who was there, lying through her teeth, in her debut acting performance? None other than CNN's
favorite actress, talking head and scamdemic promoter, Dr. Leana Wen. After the Boston Bombing, television news
went to town, pushing fear of a domestic terrorist attack that would require military brigades to roll through Boston
suburbs, enter people's homes without warrants, and search for two dudes who supposedly made a pressure cooker bomb and set
it off near the marathon's finish line. America's FBI were all over it. Emotions ran high as fake newscasters
hyped up what really happened in order to broadcast mass hysteria. Watch one of the worst crisis actors ever get
her first "15 seconds" in the limelight, preparing her for eight years later when she would push the covid plandemic on the
Counterfeit News Network. Here's the crisis actor on the scene just after the infamous Boston Marathon Bombing:
[Video clip]
CNN
Slams 'Faulty Media Narrative' Of Border Patrol Whipping Haitians (Which It Pushed For A Week). After spending
a full week promoting the discredited story that Border Patrol agents whipped illegal immigrants from Haiti attempting to
cross the U.S. border in Texas, CNN pushed back against the "faulty media narrative" — without retracting, or even
mentioning, its own misstatements. CNN media correspondent Brian Stelter, media reporter Oliver Darcy, and news anchor
Jake Tapper all addressed the erroneous reports emanating from social media. "How can DHS claim to have an independent
investigation into these Border Patrol agents, when the president says, quote, 'Those people will pay,' and you say the
images 'horrified us'?" Tapper questioned Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas on Sunday's "State of the Union."
Mayorkas doubled down that "what those images suggest, what they appeared to portray, was horrifying." "But that's the
thing," Tapper responded. "Some of the initial descriptions of those images were just patently false. There's now
video out there that provides more context. Having seen the video, are you certain that there was actually wrongdoing?"
Rasmussen
Reports confronts CNN over 'deceptive' poll on Trump's future in the Party. Rasmussen Reports, which has a
reputation for being a highly accurate polling firm, took CNN to task over what it called a "deceptive" recent survey
regarding what "most Republicans" think about a potential 2024 run by former President Donald Trump. The polling firm
was responding to the findings contained in a story headlined, "Most Republicans want Trump as the GOP's leader but are
divided about whether he'd help them retake the White House," which was published Sunday [9/12/2021].
No,
'Anti-Vax' Republicans Are Not To Blame For The Weakening Economy. CNN contributor Jill Filipovic must have a
direct line to the PR shop inside the Biden White House. That would explain her desperate attempt a few days ago to
blame Republicans for the worrisome economic signs we are seeing. Expect more of this sort of fact-free nonsense as the
economy struggles in the weeks and months ahead. "The American economy is weakening," Filipovic begins. She
notes, correctly, that job gains in August were way below forecast and Goldman Sachs just downgraded its projection for GDP
growth for the year. "And we know who is responsible." It won't surprise anyone to learn that a writer for CNN is
going to point a finger at those evil anti-vax insurrectionist Trump-loving Republicans. [...] Let's be clear. The
reason the economy is struggling is that Biden decided to abandon every pro-growth Trump policy. Inflation is rising
because Biden is deficit-spending with abandon. And he's just getting started.
Few topics create as much
hypocrisy as executive use of power. [Compare] how the press has covered Biden's vaccine mandate announcement
vs. Trump's threat to override governors on houses of worship. Spot the difference? Back in May 2020,
President Trump said he would override governors who wouldn't allow houses of worship to open. Yesterday, President
Biden said he would do the same about governors who wouldn't enforce a vaccine mandate. Can you spot the difference in
how @CNN covered it?
CNN's
Ward: Taliban 'Chanting 'Death to America' but They Seem Friendly at the Same Time'. Monday [8/16/2021]
on CNN's "New Day," network chief international correspondent Clarissa Ward delivered a report from the streets of Kabul,
Afghanistan, after Afghanistan President Ashraf Ghani reportedly fled the country upon the arrival of Taliban forces.
Ward said it is "clear" the Taliban is now back in "charge" of Afghanistan. "As soon as we leave our compound, it's
clear who is now in charge," Ward stated in a report. "Taliban fighters have flooded the capital. Smiling and
victorious, they took this city of 6 million people in a matter of hours — barely firing a shot. This
is a sight I honestly thought I would never see: scores of Taliban fighters, and just behind us, the U.S. embassy
compound. Some carry American weapons. They tell us they're here to maintain law and order."
Now Chris Cuomo must go too.
One down. One to go. Now that Andrew Cuomo has resigned, his brother, Chris, must be next. They are, after
all, both guilty of gross ethics violations. Before his "long-planned vacation" this week, it has been positively
Orwellian to watch, night after night, CNN's highest-rated primetime host blatantly ignore this huge, developing bombshell of
a story, simply because he'd rather not — while informing upper management that he would continue to advise his
brother, who also faces criminal charges and civil lawsuits. I highly doubt Andrew's resignation will impact Chris'
advisory status. His brother, after all, is still in crisis. Chris "promised not to discuss Andrew Cuomo's
strategic response to the scandal with any government official besides the governor himself," the New York Times reported.
CNN
Host Says Conservatives Are 'Demonizing Immigrants As Diseased' COVID Spreaders. Here Are Some Facts. CNN
host Brianna Keilar on Monday [8/9/2021] blamed conservatives for "demonizing immigrants as diseased spreaders" of the
coronavirus, saying that there are "no facts" to back up the claim that illegal immigrants at the southern border spread the
pathogen. "There is a crisis on the border," Keilar acknowledged Monday on CNN's New Day. [...]Last week, the Texas
border city of McAllen said that more than 7,000 migrants who tested positive for the coronavirus have been released by
Customs and Border Protection into the city since February. More than 1,500 migrants with the virus have been allowed
into McAllen over the past week, the city said. Single adults and some families have been sent back over the border
under Title 42, which allows migrants who were recently in a country where a contagious disease was present to be
expelled. However, unaccompanied children and migrant families with young children are being processed by U.S. border
authorities and then into U.S. communities.
Meghan
McCain blasts Chris Cuomo for 'the worst kind of nepotism' over Andrew Cuomo coverage. "The View" co-host
Meghan McCain on Wednesday [8/4/2021] slammed Chris Cuomo as an example of "the worst kind of nepotism" after the CNN host
failed to cover the sexual harassment scandal engulfing his brother, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo. The daughter of
late Arizona Sen. John McCain was referencing a debate about nepotism she had on "The View" last week when she commented
on the scathing official report into the allegations against the governor during Wednesday morning's show. "You want to
talk about nepotism?," McCain said, "Not having to talk about the biggest scandal in the country when it has to do with your
brother and you're hosting CNN, that's nepotism." "The Cuomo family and CNN are the worst kind of nepotism that the
media has an example of," she railed.
CNN
women stay silent on Chris Cuomo after damning depiction in AG report. As critics call for CNN prime-time host
Chris Cuomo to face consequences for moonlighting as an adviser to his governor brother over sexual harassment claims, the
network's sizable stable of female talent has so far kept quiet about their colleague's role in the political and media
scandal of the year. An analysis of show transcripts by Fox News Thursday found that none of CNN's female anchors or
on-air contributors had raised the "Cuomo Prime Time" host's ethically dubious actions outlined in a bombshell report
released Tuesday by New York Attorney General Letitia James. While CNN is the only one of the big three cable news
networks not to have a female prime-time host, their regular lineup features anchors and reporters including Christine
Romans, Alisyn Camerota, Brianna Keilar, Kate Bolduan, Erin Burnett, Dana Bash, Pamela Brown, and Ana Cabrera.
Biden
Attacks Alarmist COVID News Stories — Even As He Stokes Them. CNN might be a horribly biased and
woefully unreliable news organization these days, but its reporters do know how to convey the White House propaganda
well. Case in point is the story posted on CNN's website over the weekend about how the Biden administration is
desperately trying to get the news media to stop playing up the risk of the Delta variant. "The White House is
frustrated with what it views as alarmist, and in some instances flat-out misleading, news coverage about the Delta variant,"
reported Oliver Darcy over the weekend. "That's according to two senior Biden administration officials I spoke with
Friday, both of whom requested anonymity to candidly offer their opinion on coverage of the CDC data released that suggests
vaccinated Americans who become infected with the Delta coronavirus variant can infect others as easily as those who are
unvaccinated." Darcy goes on to provide a multitude of examples of how the White House berated various news agencies
for their coverage of the CDC report that prompted its mask-wearing mandate for vaccinated people.
Jake
Tapper Claims Election Lies Are Comparable To Denying The Holocaust. CNN's Jake Tapper claimed in an interview
published Wednesday [7/28/2021] that lies about the 2020 presidential election are comparable to denying the Holocaust.
The anchor was interviewed by Mother Jones Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery, where he was asked about the "Big Lie."
Tapper said he would not book Republicans on his show who claimed widespread voter fraud caused the 2020 presidential
election to be "stolen" from former President Donald Trump.
CNN
Continues Its Hindenburg-Like Burn in Losing Viewers With Release of New Ratings. The network that used to
brand itself the "Most Trusted Name in News" and was once the leader of the pack in cable news is now being beaten
continuously by its rivals. Possibly, activists posing as journalists is not the ratings juggernaut some thought it
would be in Atlanta. Beginning the week of July 5th, CNN viewership dropped by 19% with both overall eyeballs on the
channel and with the main advertiser target of 25-54 segment of the population. Even more shocking is their morning
news show "New Day" which hit a new low in the crucial demographic of 25-54, with only 76,000 people watching.
CNN Says
"Tucker Carlson is the New Alex Jones". CNN hosts Brian Stelter and Oliver Darcy asserted that "Tucker Carlson
is the new Alex Jones" during Stelter's show after they played clips where Carlson's rhetoric was similar to Jones' on
several different issues. After Stelter asked Darcy about the comparison, Darcy remarked, "Tucker Carlson is the new
Alex Jones — if you watch Tucker Carlson's program and you watch Alex Jones' program — they might
differ a little bit in antics and the way they deliver their message, but that message to viewers is consistent and it's
pretty identical." Darcy went on to claim that Carlson mirrored Jones in pushing "vaccine conspiracy theories, false
flag conspiracy theories, deep state conspiracy theories."
CNN,
MSNBC's ratings collapse due to 'serious credibility problem' covering Biden, experts say. The second quarter
of 2021 saw viewers ditch CNN and MSNBC in droves as experts wonder if the liberal networks can ever recover from a "serious
credibility problem" they created by relying on former President Donald Trump for success while ignoring internal gaffes and
scandals. "CNN and MSNBC were one-trick ponies, and that trick was bashing Trump," Cornell Law School professor and
media critic William A. Jacobson told Fox News. "Now that Trump no longer is president, they have tried to keep up the
mania, but it's hard. The audience has disappeared because it never was loyal to CNN and MSNBC hosts, it was loyal to
Trump hatred," Jacobson added. "It's not hard to imagine executives at CNN and MSNBC saying nightly prayers that Trump
runs for president in 2024."
CNN
Continues to Circle the Drain. When it rains, it pours. And when it comes to ratings at the Jeffrey
Zucker-led clown show known as CNN, it's a monsoon. The second quarter's ratings came out on Tuesday [6/29/2021] and
the immature, noxious, and repugnant network suffered its worst month in total viewers and the 25-54 demo since June 2019.
And that's not to mention that primetime ratings have tumbled 71 percent in total viewers and 78 percent in the demo since
January. Meanwhile, the Fox News Channel continued to assert its dominance over the competition with its 78th
consecutive quarter leading cable news and sixth straight win in all of cable, led in part due to the continued success of
shows like The Five, Gutfeld!, and Tucker Carlson Tonight. But for CNN, it's more of the same and,
for some reason, they're okay with it. In addition to the decrease in primetime, Nielsen Media Research also showed that
CNN has hemorrhaged 69 percent of its total day viewership across all ages and an astounding 75 percent in the 25-54 bracket.
CNN
Fails to Disclose Poll Was Funded by Silicon Valley Billionaire. CNN failed to disclose in a story published
last week that the "nonpartisan" group that funded polls released last Thursday which purport to show "just how far
Republicans were willing to go to support then-President Donald Trump's unprecedented efforts to subvert the 2020 election,"
is also the parent organization of an obscure nonprofit that helped the Mark Zuckerberg-funded Center for Technology and
Civic Life (CTCL) recruit local election officials to accept controversial private funding of election administration.
Australian
Media Tears American Media Apart Over Its Fawning Over Biden. American media is so infected with leftism that
it's ideologically slanted to the point of tipping over and it's highly possible that the media doesn't even know it.
It doesn't have the ability to look at itself critically, and we get very real moments where the media asks Democrats what it
can do to better help them along while on air. The media in other countries can see it, though, and Australia's, in
particular, can't help but dedicate a segment to it. On a segment during Sky News's Kenny on Media, Australian anchors
and commentators took aim at the American media for its simpering and fawning over Joe Biden during the G7 summit while the
same media bashed President Donald Trump in 2018 against all reason. Taking aim at CNN, in particular, the anchor compared
the network reporting on Biden in 2021 vs. Trump in 2018. The difference was absolutely striking, with CNN saying
that Trump was in opposition to every world leader around him, while everything about Biden seemed perfect and without trouble.
CNN's
Brian Stelter roasted by C-SPAN callers: 'Biggest minister of misinformation I have ever heard'. CNN's Brian
Stelter was mocked by callers who referred the media pundit as a "minister of misinformation" and evoked disgraced former CNN
darling Michael Avenatti during an appearance on C-SPAN's "Washington Journal" on Thursday [6/9/2021]. "Mr. Stelter
is the biggest minister of misinformation I have ever heard and I'm a news junkie," a caller identified as Kevin from Indiana
told the liberal CNN host. "This gentleman told the American people, and his news organization... for four years that
there was Russia collusion and actually, after all the $35-$40 million dollars and government investigation, we come to find
out there was zero. Zero collusion from the Trump administration and Russia," the caller continued. "His stories
absolutely evolve."
CNN's
Jim Acosta Reacts Badly to Lafayette Park Report, and We're About to Make His Day Even Worse. As we
anticipated, the heartbreak over the just-released Inspector General's detailed report on the events that took place on June 1,
2020 at Lafayette Park in Washington, D.C. is very real for CNN's Jim Acosta. And we're about to make his day much
worse — without apology. [...]Acosta, a performative "reporter" who featured prominently in many a planned dust-up
between reporters and the Trump White House back in the day, did not take to the Twitter machine last night to post his
reaction to the news. Instead, he weighed in during this morning's "New Day" broadcast, one of the lowest-rated
programs on the struggling network. During the segment, Acosta — who was one of the lead false narrative
drivers on what was originally claimed to have happened last year, sought to cast doubt on the report, proclaiming that "it
raises more questions than it answers" and suggesting it was a "whitewash" from an IG who he said "sounded" as though he was
"auditioning to become the Inspector General at Mar-A-Lago."
Chickens come home; roost. CNN's
viewership skids so low it's embarrassing. [Scroll down] Here's the nasty reality that is hitting
them: Their bad ratings then were a ceiling, not a floor, and now that they've got what they wanted, a Trump-free
America, their ratings are spiraling without a bottom. This comes at a bad time, given that all of the major cable news
networks are seeing some level of lost viewership, too. That's the broad trend, a down-market, as they say, so it's all
happening against what those in the stock market call "headwinds." They're all doing bad, but CNN has done far more poorly
the others, a laggard in a lagging market[.] Several things come to mind to explain this travesty. One, they've
got nothing but contempt for their leftist viewers. They're down to stupid stunts targeting their own viewers in a bid
to goose up viewership.
CNN ratings hit new low in
April. Nielson ratings are out, showing an abysmal drop in viewership for CNN in the month of April.
Since January, total viewership has dropped 71%. Within the 25-54 demographic, CNN snagged 798,000 primetime viewers
and 530,000 total day viewers as recently as January. Now, they only reached 229,000 during primetime and 152,000 in
total day views.
The Editor says...
CNN was much more interesting when it was transmitted in the clear and was being picked up by hobbyists with C-band
satellite dishes. The result was often a noisy analog signal that was susceptible to rain fades. Now the signal
is all digital, from Atlanta to your house, the picture is crystal clear HD, and nobody watches it. Maybe that's
because CNN gradually shifted from 24-hour journalism to annoying left-wing political activism.
CNN
drops Rick Santorum over 'racist' comments. CNN ended its contract with Rick Santorum after the former
Republican senator and two-time presidential candidate made "inaccurate" and "racist" remarks about Native Americans,
according to a report. A senior CNN executive told the Huffington Post Saturday [5/22/2021] that the network parted
ways with Santorum, a political commentator, earlier this week, even as the former Pennsylvania senator tried to explain his
comments that "there was nothing" in the US before the arrival of European colonizers on one of the network's shows earlier
this month. Santorum went on "Cuomo Prime Time" to explain that he "misspoke" in a speech to a conservative youth group
in April.
Poynter
Institute Rebukes CNN's Chris Cuomo for Advising Brother Governor on Damage Control. The Poynter Institute for
Media Studies has published a harsh reprimand of CNN anchor Chris Cuomo Thursday for his taking part in strategy sessions
advising his brother, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, amid the fallout from the governor's sexual misconduct
allegations. Poyter's Tom Jones argued that Chris Cuomo was "deservedly under scrutiny for crossing a journalistic
line" following revelations that he took part in advisory calls with Andrew Cuomo and some of his staff members, with Jones
calling the situation "a conflict of interest that has been more than a year in the making." "Stop and think about what
happened here," Jones wrote. "The host of a primetime show on one of the country's biggest and most influential cable
news networks is advising one of the most powerful and influential politicians in this country on how to handle serious
sexual misconduct allegations."
Don
Lemon Claims Democratic Party Is The Only One 'Living In Reality' And Also That He Is A 'Journalist'. CNN host
Don Lemon slammed the Republican party on CNN Friday, saying that they are not "operating in reality" and are "obsolete."
"Well, right now, the person who is in the White House is a Democrat," Lemon said. "The people who are in charge of Congress
are Democrats. The people who are in the majority, slightly, in the Senate, are Democrats. The only party, now, that is
operating in reality, is the Democratic party." "The Republican party is obsolete," he continued. "The Republican party
is not dealing and living in reality. So, you cannot negotiate with a party that doesn't operate on logic."
Chris
Cuomo proves that nothing will get you fired from CNN if you're liberal. If there's an ethics watchdog at CNN,
he must be as dead as Old Yeller. If there's a referee making sure CNN employees play by the rules, his vision is about
as reliable as Oedipus's. We know that CNN is capable of firing conservatives, since they axed commentator Jeffrey Lord
for making a joke suggesting his opponents were Nazis. But if you're a Democrat, is there any level of ethical
transgression that might cost you a gig at CNN? Conservatives have long complained that CNN is a propaganda organ of
the Democratic Party. It's no longer possible for the network to deny this, now that we know that Chris Cuomo, one of
its prime-time anchors, is also a member of Andrew Cuomo's crisis-management team, taking part in strategy sessions this year
with the governor's aides, flacks and lawyers as the Perv of Albany tried to figure out how to survive all the
sexual-harassment charges against him.
CNN
Hilariously Nukes [its] Own Narrative With Report From Incomplete Border Wall. For a hopelessly biased "news"
outlet with ratings swirling down the toilet on a daily basis, the notion that CNN actually believes that ridiculous
self-proclaimed bi-line is so, um, CNN. You can't make that up, but you don't have to — CNN's got you covered.
[...] This is reality — vs. the herculean attempts by CNN, MSNBC, and other Democrat Party water carriers to
portray illegal crossings primarily as starving unaccompanied children found huddled under some rock. A bit of snark,
there, but the point is accurate.
This
CNN Contributor Hates Israel So Much, He Praises Hitler For Killing Jews. On Sunday, about a week into a
budding war between Israel and Palestine, a CNN contributor in Pakistan by the name of Adeel Raja declared, "The world today
needs a Hitler." Raja has a long history of supporting the late Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler, sometimes explicitly mentioning
what Hitler did to the Jews — a reference to the unspeakable horrors of the Holocaust. Raja has deleted the
tweet, but Greg Price and Benny Johnson kept the receipts. CNN issued a brief statement on the matter on Sunday
evening, distancing the network from Raja. "The world today needs a Hitler," Raja posted on Twitter Sunday afternoon.
[... Update:] CNN released a statement to Yashar Ali, a contributor to New York magazine and HuffPost. "As a
freelancer, his reporting contributed to some newsgathering efforts from Islamabad. However, in light of these
abhorrent statements, he will not be working with CNN again in any capacity," the network said.
Outrage
after social media users discover series of Hitler-praising tweets from CNN freelancer. CNN is under fire for
having hired a writer who posted several times on social media that he believes the world needs another "Hitler." Social
media users demanded that the network respond after discovering the tweets from one of its freelance contributors, Adeel
Raja, who has written dozens of pieces for the outlet. After some digging, it turned out to be one of several messages
Raja has posted praising the Nazi leader.
Desperate
Don Lemon 'apologizes' after teasing 'end' of his show in duplicitous publicity stunt. Is planting misleading
innuendo about oneself a good tool to sell the services of an information provider? In what other product category does
one openly debase the quality as a means of gathering attention? Tucker Carlson, whose viewership is more than 4 times
that of Don Lemon's, likes to characterize the CNN host as stupid. That label certainly applies to the publicity stunt
trick Lemon pulled on Friday night [5/14/2021].
How
Chris Cuomo Hitched Himself to Rebekah Jones' Sinking Ship of Lies. Last year, a website operator for the
Florida Department of Health, Rebekah Jones became the liberal media's new Michael Avenatti when she started claiming she was
fired for disobeying orders to manipulate COVID data. And since she was attacking Republican Governor Ron DeSantis, CNN
Prime Time host Chris Cuomo eagerly promoted her claims as it provided a distraction from his brother, Governor Andrew
Cuomo's (D-NY) own COVID data manipulation. That was, until he dropped her once she got arrested. Jones was back
in the news Thursday [5/13/2021] after National Review's Charles C. W. Cooke published a brutal takedown of her
claims, actually detailing how and why she was fired. So, NewsBusters thought this was the perfect time to look back at
how Chris "Fredo" Cuomo rolled out the welcome mat for the lunacy several times over the course of 2020.
CNN Comedy Hour With Jim Acosta.
CNN Newsroom with Jim Acosta is more of an extended sit-down comedy routine than an actual news program. Over
the past several weeks, Acosta has been using his platform on CNN to unleash a barrage of painfully crafted knee-slappers,
most of them aimed at former president Donald Trump and Fox News host Tucker Carlson. His ratings might be in the
gutter, but Acosta's tortured comedy routine is presumably a smash hit with his target audience of #Resistance wine moms.
Media
Outlet Identified! — CNN Is Caught Outside AZ Audit Center Parking Lot Harassing State Audit Workers. On Friday night [4/30/2021]
The Gateway Pundit Jordan Conradson interviewed Arizona Audit Director Ken Bennett on the latest developments in the historic Maricopa County forensic audit.
Ken gave The Gateway Pundit an exclusive on the historic audit that continued Friday at Veterans Memorial Coliseum in Phoenix. Ken Bennett also dropped this
bomb during the interview. The liberal media is attempting to dox the audit workers! [Video clip]
CNN
Sends Narrative Engineers to Maricopa County Arizona to Frame Extremist Narrative. Things are escalating in
Maricopa County Arizona as the first week of the ballot audit comes to a close. After democrats lost several court
challenges; and after a state judge affirms the right of the Arizona Senate to conduct an audit; CNN has dispatched their
hit-team to document the workers and frame an extremist narrative.
CNN
'fact checker' provides cover for violent BLM protesters at Iowa state Capitol. Black Lives Matter protesters
were kicked out of the Iowa state Capitol at an organized protest this month after turning violent and allegedly assaulting a
police officer. They intending to "kill" several so-called "racist" bills at the statehouse, one which would increase
riot-related penalties. Yesterday, Black Lives Matter protesters stormed the Iowa State Capitol to try and "kill"
legislative bills they opposed (their event was called "Kill the racist bills"). Josephine Mulvihill was arrested & charged
with assaulting an officer. CNN "fact checker" Daniel Dale suggested that the left-wing demonstrators did not storm
state grounds and acted within the legal terms of the protest permit granted to gather outside the Capitol and in the
building's first floor Rotunda.
CNN
Laughs, Accuses Sen. Tim Scott of Tokenism, an Uncle Tom for GOP. Casual racism was the disgusting tone
CNN decided to go with following South Carolina Senator Tim Scott's delivery of the Republican response to President Biden's
address to Congress Wednesday night. Together, chief political correspondent Dana Bash and senior political
correspondent Abby Phillip cackled as they attacked Scott as a liar for defending Republican election integrity efforts and
dispelling the false notion they were worse than Jim Crow. As Bash was getting into her reaction to Scott's rebuttal,
she started to give a wink and nudge to Scott's supposed status as a token black by noting his "brand" and "unique voice in
the Republican Party." She went on to essentially suggest Scott was being an Uncle Tom for defending something that was
allegedly "worse than Jim Crow".
Like
A Fuzzy Koala Bear, CNN's Sour Grapes Are Adorable But Dangerous. CNN's sour grapes are fermenting into a
pathetic, albeit amusing, daily display. Watching the channel smugly attempt to punch up at Fox News almost evokes the
same empathy you feel when watching a toddler try to grab cookies off a too-tall counter. They just don't have what it
takes, but don't you dare try to tell them otherwise. Enter Brianna Keilar, the newly minted "anchor" of "New Day,"
the network's morning program. One of her first monologues on the program sought to analyze Fox News's chyrons for
allegedly revealing that "Fox is not news, no matter what it calls itself." The irony is entirely lost on Keilar, who is
simply not an "anchor," no matter what she calls herself. The entire package feels like a j-school lightweight
auditioning for Rachel Maddow's job, replete with facile jabs that lack logic as much as self-awareness.
'That
is a campaign violation': Donald Trump tells Sean Hannity CNN broke law. Donald Trump has accused CNN of
committing a 'campaign violation' after a technical director with the network admitted on camera that they stood in
opposition to his presidency. The former president spoke to Sean Hannity of Fox News, and was asked what he thought of
a sting carried out by Project Veritas, a conservative watchdog group. An undercover reporter met the CNN camera
operative through a dating app, and then filmed him discussing the network's approach. [...] 'What they are doing is a
massive campaign violation. When you look at what they did.' Trump, who has been at war with social media
companies since he was removed from their platforms following the January Capitol riot, called for more regulation of their
operations. He said they were biased towards Democrats, and needed more scrutiny.
On CNN, "Town Hall" means "one-sided Democrat infomercial." CNN
plans climate change town hall after staffer reveals plan to sell climate 'fear' in leaked recording. CNN is
set to host a live town hall with senior Biden administration officials this weekend on the topic of climate change, weeks
after a network employee told an undercover journalist the network planned to push "fear" about the issue. The town
hall, moderated by CNN anchor Dana Bash, will focus on "The Climate Crisis" and will air on Friday night to mark this year's
celebration of Earth Day, the network announced. The participants include Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John
Kerry, White House National Climate Advisor Gina McCarthy, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Michael Regan and
Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm, all of whom will be asked about Biden's campaign promise to remake American climate policy.
Chauvin
called a 'serial murderer' on CNN, baffled hosts scramble to clarify. CNN Newsroom hosts scrambled to save
their segment on Tuesday [4/20/2021] after a guest called former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin a "serial
murderer." "We talk a lot. It's a network," host Victor Blackwell said to Minneapolis activist Leslie E.
Redmond. "What is the conversation that we are not having that we should be?" Redmond, former president of the
Minneapolis NAACP, replied, "You know, Chauvin, who is a serial murderer, just so we're clear, he's murdered numerous people
in Minneapolis. He's part of a bigger system. When he's held accountable, he'll be the first white male officer
held accountable for murdering a black person in the state of Minnesota."
CNN
Actually Defends Maxine Waters For 'Inciting' Anti-Police Violence. Here is yet another reason why no one
should take CNN seriously. The same network that has accused the GOP of "genocide" and ending the country" for violence
from Trump supporters on January 6, spent this morning defending a Democrat for what many would call, openly encouraging
violence from left-wing protesters (while intimidating a jury!) California Democrat Maxine Waters went to Minneapolis
this weekend to encourage Black Lives Matter protesters to ignore curfews and get more "confrontational" if the jury does not
find Derek Chauvin, guilty of murder. She added, "We've got to make sure that they know that we mean business" and that
they would "not go away" if he was acquitted. Waters made these comments after several days of violent riots and just
hours before the Minnesota National Guard and police were shot at in a drive-by shooting in Minneapolis. After several
Republicans called out the Democrat for "inciting violence", CNN's New Day spent two segments attacking the GOP instead.
During the 7 am hour, co-host John Berman went on a tirade ripping Senator Ted Cruz [R-TX] for calling out Waters.
Brian
Stelter melts under pressure from Project Veritas journo. Far-left CNN political commentator Brian Stelter grew
visibly irate like a giant, angry polar bear (one in flip-flops and shorts, that is) when investigative journalists with
Project Veritas recorded themselves confronting him inside the hallway of a New York City high-rise apartment building.
It's not clear if the building was Stelter's home. In case it was, it should be noted that his employer, CNN, has shown
no qualms about confronting people at their homes. Uploaded to YouTube and Rumble on Friday, the video footage began
with a journalist approaching Stelter and casually asking how he was doing. Stelter responded in kind and seemed cheery
and upbeat as usual up until the moment the tough questions began. [Video clip]
Twitter suspends Project
Veritas founder James O'Keefe after undercover scoops on CNN's pro-Biden, BLM & Covid-19 propaganda. Twitter
has banned Project Veritas founder James O'Keefe for alleged violation of its policies on "platform manipulation and spam,"
silencing his account amid a series of undercover scoops on CNN's propagandist tactics. The social media giant told
O'Keefe on Thursday [4/15/2021] that his account was permanently suspended and will not be reinstated, citing an allegation
that he used fake or multiple accounts to manipulate conversations on the platform. Twitter said in a statement to The
Hill and other media outlets that "you can't artificially amplify or disrupt conversations through the use of multiple
accounts." The shutdown came after O'Keefe posted three straight days of scoops in which CNN technical director Charlie
Chester is shown on video, talking to an undercover reporter. Chester, who reportedly thought he was talking to a
Tinder date, told the reporter about CNN's propagandist efforts to oust President Donald Trump, its fearmongering about
Covid-19 to boost ratings and its efforts to make Black Lives Matter look good.
CNN
staffer says network 'trying to help' Black Lives Matter in secretly recorded video. Project Veritas continued
to cause headaches for CNN on Thursday when it published another secretly recorded video featuring network technical director
Charles Chester discussing how his employer manipulates coverage to fit its liberal agenda. "I was trying to do some
research on, like, the Asian hate, like the people are getting attacked and whatnot. A bunch of Black men have been
attacking Asians. I'm like 'What are you doing? Like, we are trying to help BLM,'" Chester said in the
video. Chester noted that "conservatives" would pounce if it was reported that Black people were the ones committing
hate crimes because it wouldn't coincide with the Black Lives Matter movement.
Twitter
Bans James O'Keefe After Latest Round of Hidden Videos Exposing CNN — O'Keefe to Sue Twitter for Defamation.
Twitter banned Project Veritas founder James O'Keefe after he posted multiple videos exposing CNN's left-wing bias. Project
Veritas on Thursday [4/15/2021] released a third bombshell undercover video of CNN Director Charlie Chester admitting that the
network is "trying to help" Black Lives Matter by protecting their narrative on race. Chester admits that they have only been
pushing stories that implicate white people, during a conversation with a Tinder date that ended up being a Project Veritas reporter.
Chester admitted that while researching Asian hate, they found that it is mostly black men attacking them — so they
did not dig in deeper.
The
next wave of leftist propaganda is hitting America's shores. On Tuesday [4/13/2021], Project Veritas released a
video showing a CNN technical director named Charlie Chester who cheerfully spilled the beans: under the leadership of
Jeffrey Zucker, CNN is a pure Democrat propaganda outfit that worked hard to get Trump out of the White House. With
that mission accomplished, it's going to change its propaganda to pushing climate change because "fear sells." Also on
Tuesday, CNS News reported that numerous news sites have promised that, henceforth, they'll be calling climate change a
"climate emergency." In the Project Veritas video, CNN technical director Charlie Chester explained with great specificity
how CNN played the game. CNN's game isn't reporting the news in an unbiased fashion to help educate people.
Instead, its job is to support Democrats. "Look, what we did, we [CNN] got Trump out." When it came to anything
Trump, the point was to paint a negative picture.
NR
tries and fails to take down James O'Keefe. National Review today once again tried to take down an actual
conservative. Once again it failed. Dan McLaughlin got in a Twitter spat with James O'Keefe of Project
Veritas. To promote his latest expose, O'Keefe tweeted a video clip and wrote, "CNN Technical Director Charlie Chester:
'Look what we did, we [@CNN] got Trump out. I am 100% going to say it, and I 100% believe that if it wasn't for CNN, I
don't know that Trump would have got voted out... I came to CNN because I wanted to be a part of that.'" That is [...]
pretty good work. Every conservative journalist is proud of O'Keefe's work. Naturally, National Review is upset.
Enter McLaughlin who tweeted, "If true, damning of CNN. But unfortunately, it's hard for anyone to bet their credibility on
believing that a Project Veritas video will withstand close scrutiny." If true? O'Keefe has the man on videotape
saying the things he quoted him as saying. Who are you going to believe, National Review or your own eyes?
A
CNN employee continues to give away devastating trade secrets. As is always the case with Project Veritas, it
doesn't stop with one video. Instead, day after day, there's a steady drip, drip, drip of incriminating videos about
Project Veritas's target — in this case, CNN. Two days ago, we learned that CNN boss Jeff Zucker instructed
employees to do everything they could, including lying, to ensure Trump's loss and Biden's win. On Thursday, the latest
video revealed that you weren't imagining it when you suspected CNN of deliberately slanting its racial coverage to protect
Blacks and Black Lives Matter. There's an interesting change of tone in Thursday's video. In the video released
on Tuesday, CNN Technical Director Charlie Chester was boastfully triumphant as he explained how CNN deliberately set about
to undermine Trump and bolster Biden. He was proud of the "propaganda" that pushed Jeff Zucker's (and, presumably, all
of the CNN employees') partisan agenda. In the latest video, about CNN's deliberate effort to hide a malefactor's race
if he or she is Black, Chester seems sad and confused.
CNN
Director Admits Network Weaponized COVID Death Toll — Project Veritas Report. The mainstream media loves a high
human death toll. Take it from CNN Technical Director Charlie Chester, who was reportedly catfished through a dating
site, according to Mediaite, and led to unwittingly disclose to the world that leftist CNN's dark reporting tactics through
the last year were allegedly rooted in a desire to see more dead mothers, fathers, daughters, sons and grandparents.
Video shared by Project Veritas on Tuesday [4/13/2021] purported to show Chester admitting his employer engages in pushing
"propaganda" in order to achieve its political ends. Conservative journalist James O'Keefe shared undercover video
Tuesday he said was of Chester bragging about CNN's 2020 mission: to oust former President Donald Trump. The
video is compelling. [Video clip]
Watch:
CNN Staffer Goes on Five Tinder Dates With Project Veritas Spy Recording the Whole Thing. James O'Keefe's
Project Veritas has just released new, secretly recorded footage on Tuesday that reveals CNN employees describing how the
network worked to support President Joe Biden's campaign during the 2020 presidential election. Mediaite has learned
that this is the first in a series. CNN Technical Director Charlie Chester played the video's starring role. "Our
focus was to get Trump out of office, right?" the video shows Chester telling someone off-camera. "Without saying it,
that's what it was." As is the case with videos made from source material captured from hidden cameras, one should
approach the final product with a healthy dose of caution. Post-production editing is a dark art that can materially
change the meaning and context of many things that seem obvious at first blush. [...] But in this instance, there are enough
examples of full and complete comments made by Chester that were clearly not crafted out of thin air, or misleading editing tricks.
CNN
Director Admits Network Pumps 'Propaganda' And 'Speculation' — "Our Focus Was To Get Trump Out Of Office".
Project Veritas has released a stunning new undercover video of CNN Technical Director Charlie Chester admitting his network fueled
speculative propaganda against President Trump in order to remove him from office. In the clip below, Chester admits the network
will soon shift to fear-mongering over climate change. "Fear sells," he gloats. "No one ever says those things out
loud, but it's obvious." Earlier this week The National Pulse exposed CNN's Gabby Orr after she promoted a demonstrably false
story concerning President Trump and Congressman Matt Gaetz. [Video clip]
CNN
Director Admits Network Airs Political Propaganda, Outlines Network Efforts to Remove President Trump and Boost Joe
Biden. Project Veritas and James O'Keefe strike again with undercover video of CNN executives admitting their
goal was to boost Joe Biden and eliminate President Trump in the 2020 election. Additionally CNN Technical Director
Charlie Chester admits the network is engaged in propaganda to advance the COVID narrative. Quite a remarkable bit of
undercover expose' by Project Veritas. [Video clip]
Project
Veritas caught a CNN director telling the partisan truth. Every conservative who's ever watched CNN has known
with certainty that the media outlet is acting as a propaganda arm of the Democrat party. However, when we point that
out, we get gaslighted. We're told that we're paranoid, that we can't distinguish facts from our delusions, and that
we're sore losers. That's why conservatives reveled in Tuesday's Project Veritas video drop because it vindicated them
completely. Charlie Chester, CNN technical director, openly revels in the network's "propaganda" to "get Trump out of
office." Sadly, when CNN talks, people still listen. The mere fact that Joe Biden is in the White House, despite a
storied career of lies, plagiarism, vulgarity, viciousness, creepiness, and continuously bad foreign policy decisions, tells
you that the people who voted for him (and there were real, legal voters who did vote for him) were on the receiving end of
some heavy-duty indoctrination. Thanks to Project Veritas's efforts, we finally have confirmation that CNN deliberately
engaged in this indoctrination. Here are just a few statements from Chester that will give you a feel for the video,
even if you can't or don't want to watch it" [...]
Gaetz
Turns it Around on CNN Journo After Network Exec Says Their Coverage of Him is "Propaganda". CNN has
breathlessly covered purported allegations of sexual misconduct against Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) and the FBI investigation
into said purported allegations, and now, thanks to Project Veritas, we know that a great deal of that coverage is driven by
a desire to destroy Gaetz. CNN Technical Director Charlie Chester said the network is "going to keep running those
stories to keep hurting him," because "He's a problem for the Democratic Party because he's so conservative." As my
colleague Bonchie covered, Chester said that CNN's "focus" in the 2020 election "was to get Trump out of office" and that
Chester and his colleagues were "more than keen to take credit for putting Joe Biden in the White House." Chester even went
so far as to add a bullet point to his now-deleted LinkedIn account claiming he "played an integral part in the 2020
Presidential elections."
Watch:
Leaked Video Shows CNN Director Admits Matt Gaetz Stories Are Democrat Propaganda. Newly uncovered hidden
camera footage reveals CNN's technical director admitting that stories surrounding Rep. Matt Gaetz are "propaganda"
aimed at aiding the Democratic Party. In a stunning admission, Charlie Chester admits, "If the agenda say, is to like
get, like Matt Gaetz right now, he's like this Republican. He's a problem for the Democratic Party because he's so
conservative and he can cause a lot of hiccups in passing of laws and what not. So it would be great for the Democratic
Party to get him out."
How
CNN Faked a Story about Matt Gaetz, Got Caught, But Still Won't Remove It. In the early afternoon of April
11th, 2021, internal and external communications staffers for embattled Congressman Matt Gaetz (FL-1) received a request for
comment from newly minted CNN reporter Gabby Orr. Orr, a former POLITICO employee, would report as her first story for
Jeff Zucker's network that Rep. Gaetz had been denied a meeting with former President Trump. The aim of the story
was to weaken support for Gaetz on Capitol Hill as the House returns from recess. Orr's e-mail read: "Apologies
for bothering you on a Sunday but I wanted to run something by you for confirmation before reporting it out... I was told by
two people familiar that Congressman Matt Gaetz asked to meet with former President Trump at [Mar-A-Lago] last week and was
denied." But Orr did, in fact, "report it out" before receiving any confirmation from either side. And the
original CNN story claimed neither side has responded, which wasn't true.
CNN
Claims Biden's Policies May Prove 'Popular' With Republicans. According to certain commentators on CNN,
President Joe Biden's policies are actually "popular" among Republican voters. During a segment Wednesday night
[4/7/2021], Don Lemon hosted a panel wherein they discussed Biden's current initiatives on gun control and infrastructure,
suggesting that his focus on getting things done will prove popular with Republicans.
The Higher
Superstition: The fallacy that lies behind "follow the science" fundamentalism. More and more frequently
we so-called advanced moderns believe things to be true that an illiterate farmer in 1800 would have known to be false.
As every year passes, the self-proclaimed progressive "brights" — those who "follow the science" rigorously, they
claim, when making and supporting public policies — endorse as proven facts beliefs and policies that are driven
by ideological or venal self-interest rather than truth. If they continue, the consequences will be the bankruptcy of
our culture, economy, and political freedom. Take this statement from CNN, a loud champion of "science": "It is
not possible to know a person's 'gender identity' at birth, and there is no consensus criteria for assigning sex at
birth." Such a statement back in 1800 would have been dismissed as the ravings of a crank or the sales-pitch for some
patent snake-oil.
CNN
News Article Says 'No Consensus Criteria for Assigning Sex at Birth'. A Tuesday [3/30/2021] CNN news story
stated as fact that "there is no consensus criteria for assigning sex at birth" without attribution. The CNN story,
written by breaking news reporter Devan Cole, was about Republican South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem's battle with state
lawmakers over HB 1217, a bill that seeks to ban biological males from women's sports. "?It's not possible to know a
person's gender identity at birth, and there is no consensus criteria for assigning sex at birth," Cole wrote, without attribution.
Pro
tip from CNN: "Not possible" to know a baby's "gender identity" at birth. Can we tell a baby's gender at
birth? After untold millennia of human experience — and the emergence of "gender reveal party" industry to
the contrary — CNN's news section informs us that we should believe them rather than our own lying eyes. In
a report on South Dakota governor Kristi Noem's executive order barring transgendered biological males from competing in
women's sports, Devan Cole insists that telling "gender identity" is impossible at birth.
CNN's
"COVID War" Special Was a Scripted Fauci and Birx Reality Show. The dynamic duo of Drs. Anthony Fauci and
Deborah Birx spent nine months of 2020 (February-October) appearing to be the adults in the room who had to deal with, as the
legacy media loved to frame it, an ever petulant, ill-informed, and dangerous President Donald J. Trump. In CNN's
'COVID War' Special on Sunday [3/28/2021], I surmise that all doubt was removed on who the adults were, and it certainly was
not these doctors. The wholesale campaign to throw the president, and others, under the bus on the COVID policy that
they helped to create, then taking credit for the COVID breakthroughs that they had little to do with, is reminiscent of
children jockeying for position to benefit themselves.
Former
CNN contributor slams network for having a 'thumb' on the scale. While it doesn't take a rational viewer long
to determine that CNN is a network heavily biased to the left, it's not so much that they are prejudiced against the right as
much as it is their arrogance in billing themselves as a "trusted" news source. The term "Fake News CNN" became popular
under former President Donald Trump, who frequently called the network out for its reporting, and never has their credibility
been as wavering as it did once CNN President Jeff Zucker embarked on a Trump-hating agenda. A four year campaign of
all but dedicating 24/7 coverage to tarnishing the former president — a campaign that paid dividends in November
2020. And it doesn't help matters when one of CNN's former contributors comes forward to flat out accuse them of having
their thumb on the scale.
The 'Pathetic'
Genesis of a Fake News Story. In a headline clearly designed to prompt outrage, CNN recently claimed that
"Sidney Powell argues in new court filing that no reasonable people would believe her election fraud claims."
Similarly, CBS News asserted that "Sidney Powell tells court 'no reasonable person' would take her voter fraud claims as
fact." The implication is that Powell, one of the most prominent critics of the 2020 presidential election, who has been
outspoken in her claims that Joe Biden's victory was secured through outright fraud involving, in particular, illegal and
malicious manipulation of the vote-counting machines, has now repudiated those claims. [...] Powell has not, in any way,
retreated from her claims. In spite of the assurances to the contrary from Democrats and the mainstream media,
uncertainties remain about the integrity of Biden's election as president. Prominent among these is the operation of
the software and hardware provided by the "election infrastructure company Dominion Voting Systems," which has sued Powell
for defamation for her public assertions that Dominion's machines were used as instruments of fraud.
CNN
Went to Great Lengths to Avoid Calling Tragic DC Uber Eats Story What It Is. So, is CNN allergic to the
truth? Oh right — you already know that they are. This isn't a Trump-related news story,
however. It's a local crime story from Washington, D.C., but it became a national story, or at least it should, because
of how the network framed the tragic story. An Uber driver was assaulted and killed by two teenagers, and CNN decided
to frame the incident as an "accident." I'm not kidding. It was a carjacking attempt gone wrong.
Fake
News? Progressive publication thinks CNN migrant crossing video was staged. Is CNN back in the business
of fake news? Is fake news the addiction it just can't quit? It is, if a progressive magazine, American Prospect,
has it right about a staged border crossing, and based on their report, they made a very good argument. [...] Still another
issue was the orderliness of the migrants, who stood in single file line awaiting their turn. Not even open-borders
advocates claimed that that was normal migrant behavior, illegal migrants don't wait their turn in line. There was also
the nature of migrant smugglers — would they really stand by as a camera crew filmed them instead of pull out
their guns as criminals do? Seems implausible. Human smugglers are an arm of Mexico's cartels. Fakest of
all would be CNN's claim that it just 'happened' upon this smuggling operation by chance. Who the heck believes that?
CNN's
correction to the imploded Trump/Georgia story leaves something to be desired. The Washington Post has issued a
major correction to a story that caught fire with Dems and the media (pardon the redundancy) back in January. This is
the Post's correction: [Tweet] At the time, other media outlets, including CNN, jumped all over the story because it
fit their desired narrative perfectly. CNN's tweet from January 9th remains: [Tweet] CNN has gotten around to
issuing a correction, albeit a much smaller one than the WaPo. You'll notice they claim Trump was being paraphrased
while the story had quote marks around what Trump supposedly said: [Tweet]
CNN's
war on Fox News goes nuclear — with a twist. CNN's on again-on again war (that's not a
typo — it never ends) against Fox News is getting hotter, most likely because CNN is once again seriously trailing
Fox News in the ratings. Brian Stelter, his network's leading attack dog, was at it again yesterday [3/14/2021] on his
weekly program CNN Reliable (sic) Sources. The program led with a full-frontal attack on Fox News's most
highly rated show, Tucker Carlson Tonight, and its host, veteran reporter, editor, and television talk show host
Tucker Carlson. [...] You have to hand it to Tucker Carlson. Such an attack provides more proof — as if any
is needed — that he is right over the target of the insane left wing's lies and hypocrisy that get more outrageous
every day.
Prelude
to a Kiss? State Dept. to 'intensify' inquiry into Cuban sonic attacks. Anyone with half a
brain — maybe even much less than that — can easily discern the handiwork of Castro, Inc. in the
neurological injuries sustained by American and Canadian diplomats in Castrogonia. Yet, most media outlets keep
treating this news story as some kind of impenetrable mystery. Here is the latest installment from the Castro News
Network (CNN), which prefers to refer to the injuries as "Havana Syndrome", a term invented by Canadians in order to absolve
Castro, Inc. of all responsibility by implying that mass hysteria of some sort is involved. The article predictably
quotes Bernie Sanders' senatorial colleague and fellow Castrophilliac Jeanne Shaheen, who blames Trump for botching the
investigation and silently implies that he did so on purpose so he could punish Castro, Inc. unfairly. Anyway, it looks
as if Jar-Jar Biden has now greased the skids for a quick and easy absolution of Castro, Inc. Naturally, this move is
being disguised as an honest "inquiry."
Guess
How CNN Is Describing the Crisis at the Southern Border. Democrats and their cohorts in the media chided
President Donald Trump over immigration policies that resulted in holding "kids in cages" and "separating families" at the
United States-Mexico border, a claim that lacked nuance. It was something the left repeatedly hammered as inhumane and
wrong. But now, roughly six weeks into his administration, President Joe Biden is continuing with a policy that was
first established under President Barack Obama. Biden's holding unaccompanied minors in the administration's "first
migrant child facility" — you know, the type of facility that was labeled as "kids in cages" when Trump was in
office? CNN, however, decided to cover the "first migrant child facility" in a way that downplays the severity at the
border. Instead of referring to them as "kids in cages," like they have in the past, the network took a more subtle approach.
Media Bias? What
Media Bias? How is Chris Cuomo still on the air at CNN? Chris Cuomo has realized that he's related to the
Governor of New York State. [...] Now that there are questions about sexual misconduct, and coverups of the death toll from
his nursing home policies, Brother Chris wants to bow out. Right.
'Thank
God for Andrew Cuomo': A Timeline Of CNN's Adoring Coverage Of Andrew Cuomo. In pursuit of their "higher
objective" of unseating former President Donald Trump, the Leftist legacy media vocally rallied behind New York Governor
Andrew Cuomo in 2020, presenting him as the hero of the pandemic, as the supposed ultimate example of leadership when
compared to President Trump. Now that he no longer serves an obvious purpose with a Democrat in the White House, the
tide has suddenly turned, with the adoring coverage dying down amid a growing number of sexual assault and harassment
allegations — all while the COVID cover-up which contributed to the death of thousands of elderly New Yorkers
continues to hang over his administration.
CNN's
Finger-pointing on 'Misinformation' Should Be Done in a Mirror. Brian Stelter and Oliver Darcy, CNN's in-house
cheerleaders for censoring or squelching conservative media outlets, celebrated a letter in which Democrats on the House
Energy and Commerce Committee pressed TV providers to punish right-wing spreaders of so-called misinformation.
Reps. Anna Eshoo and Jerry McNerney, both California Democrats, asked, "What moral or ethical principles (including
those related to journalistic integrity, violence, medical information, and public health) do you apply in deciding which
channels to carry or when to take adverse actions against a channel?" CNN exudes arrogance about its own performance,
never worrying that TV providers will question the quality of its information or its journalistic integrity. One major
provider is AT&T, which owns CNN. Another is Comcast, which owns NBC, CNBC, and MSNBC. So those providers dumping
Fox or putting it in a more obscure channel tier would look like a crass commercial move, not some public-spirited stand.
The
Thread That Shreds CNN's Fake News idiocy... and This Is Just the Tip of the Iceberg. Remember when Fox News'
Tucker Carlson ripped into the news media for spreading misinformation, specifically the drivel emanating from the offices of
CNN? Well, we have some receipts documenting CNN's long history of disseminating fake news idiocy. Actually, it
was done by Brent Bozell, the founder of the Media Research Center, which tracks liberal media bias. Newsbusters doles
out stories about the liberal media's bad behavior daily. It's the point of the lance within this organization.
Since its inception, the MRC has recorded every major news broadcast since 1987. It's now digitized, but whatever CNN
has said that was pure applesauce, it will be recorded, filed, and found by this crew.
CNN
Ripped For 'Bizarre Distortion' Of Clarence Thomas Dissent In PA Election Case. CNN legal analyst Joan Biskupic
was excoriated for a Monday article in which she claimed Justice Clarence Thomas sympathized with former President Donald
Trump's allegations of election fraud in one of his dissents earlier this week. "Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas
on Monday claimed election fraud is a threat to America, revealing in a forceful dissent some support for former President
Donald Trump and Republicans who have refused to accept the result of the 2020 election," Biskupic began in an article titled
"Justice Clarence Thomas reveals some sympathy for Trump's baseless fraud claims."
Rebuttal to Fake News
CNN's Hatchet Job. The recent baseless CNN attack on us is a fake news media hit job of epic proportions which
lacks all journalistic ethics and impartiality. CNN's attack demonstrates that it is not just questioning of the
alleged safety of vaccines but "free speech itself." What is indisputable (but not mentioned in CNN's biased report) is
that the COVID vaccines are being used under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the FDA. An EUA makes the vaccine
available for "public health emergencies," but also means that the FDA has not yet compiled all the evidence and clinical
data that it would examine before fully approving a drug for public distribution and use. When combined with the
Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Declaration of February 4, 2020 and the invocation of the PREP Act, the
vaccine manufacturers are immune from legal liability (i.e., they cannot be sued for money damages in court) for losses
relating to the administration or use of covered countermeasures (like vaccines) against COVID-19. Despite over 500
reported deaths from the COVID vaccine (according to the CDC's VAERS database), the CNN report insinuates that vaccines are
undeniably "safe" while totally ignoring the indisputable $4.4 Billion paid out to Americans damaged by previous
vaccinations — an amount paid by the DHHS itself!
Brian
Stelter Asks Politifact About Andrew Cuomo, and the Interview Was Everything Wrong With Journalism.
Fact-checkers and journalists alike have done major damage to their respective professions over the years — the
last four years especially, and two of the most notable examples of such are Politifact and CNN's Brian Stelter. On
Sunday during his "Reliable Sources" program, Stelter had on his network's resident fact-checker and fellow Joe Biden
apologist Daniel Dale as well as Politifact's editor-in-chief Angie Drobnic Holan to discuss fact-checking in the Biden
era. We've been told in the past by our intellectual betters like Dale about how Biden supposedly doesn't lie a
lot. So you'd think Stelter and his guests wouldn't have had much to say during the segment. But they did,
especially when Stelter asked Holan about Gov. Andrew Cuomo's nursing home scandal and the fallout from it.
Cruz
Calls CNN 'Dem Propagandists' For Story About GOP Senators And Defense Team. On Thursday night [2/11/2021], CNN
ran a story about three Republican senators who met with former President Donald Trump's defense team "in the middle of an
impeachment trial in which they will vote on whether to convict Trump and potentially bar him from holding public office
again." The news outlet called out Senators Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Ted Cruz of Texas and Mike Lee of Utah for
reportedly "going into a room in the US Capitol that Trump's lawyers were using to prepare for their arguments." One of
Trump's lawyers, David Schoen, commented "that the senators were 'very friendly guys' who just wanted to make sure they were
'familiar with procedure' on the eve of their rebuttal to the House impeachment managers' presentation." Schoen was
asked whether or not it was "appropriate" to meet with senators while the trial is ongoing, to which he replied, "Oh yeah, I
think that's the practice of impeachment." He also added, "There's nothing about this thing that has any semblance of due
process whatsoever."
CNN
and the dangerous distortion of truth while New Yorkers died. CNN was blasted as "an abject disgrace to both
the journalism profession and America writ large" in the wake of an aide to New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo admitting the
state withheld COVID-19 nursing home death data after months of glowing coverage from the disgraced network. Gov. Cuomo's
little brother, Chris, hosts "Cuomo Prime Time" on CNN, regularly providing a platform last year for the governor to appeal to
viewers by conducting playful on-air conversations masquerading as interviews amid the nursing home scandal.
What
we still don't know about the Capitol riot. On Jan. 6, supporters of Donald Trump swarmed the Capitol
building. Some forced their way inside, and Washington has never been the same. It may never be the same.
As a result of what happened on Jan. 6, your descendants will live in a very different country. Some in Congress have
compared that day to 9/11. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., has likened it to Pearl Harbor, which spurred
America's entry into the Second World War. Every day we hear new and more florid comparisons from Democratic
partisans. But Tuesay night, CNN outdid all of them by comparing what happened Jan. 6 to the Rwandan genocide.
Keep in mind that close to a million people were murdered in Rwanda in 1994, about 70% of all ethnic Tutsis in the
country. Entire towns were hacked to death with machetes. People were set on fire and crushed alive by
bulldozers. Hundreds of thousands of women were raped. It was among the most horrifying crimes in human history.
CNN's
Cooper Compares Trump, Supporters to Hutus in Rwandan Genocide. Tuesday night on CNN, AC360 host
Anderson Cooper added to the Jeffrey Zucker-led network's resume of hate against those they disagree with as he compared
former President Donald Trump and his supporters to those that carried out the Bosnian and Rwanda genocides in the
1990s. And to underscore Cooper's seriousness, a NewsBusters search found that he also leveled these comparisons back
on January 12. To give you an idea of just how callous this comparison was, 8,000 men were slaughtered in July 1995
during the 1992-1995 Bosnian War that killed over 100,000 people. Over in Rwanda, more 800,000 moderate Hutus and
Tutsis were killed over three months in 1994 by the Hutu extremists. Cooper was speaking Tuesday with Congressman Adam
Kinzinger (R-IL) when he lamented that a feature of our political discourse has been "otherizing people" and make them "other
than American, other than patriotic, other than — than human."
Brian
Stelter Says CNN Is Not Trying To Eliminate Its Conservative Rivals, Only "Liars". Like the Democratic party,
CNN is using the unfortunate events that took place in the nation's capital during a rally for election integrity to
eliminate their competition. In the case of the Democrats, an increasingly unhinged Nancy Pelosi and her minions
including Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have accused their Republican House colleagues of being an "enemy within" with growing
calls for the expulsion of their opponents. On a drastically more dangerous level, the so-called "storming" of the
Capitol by Trump supporters along with Antifa provocateurs who were allowed into the building by police has served as the
impetus for a terrifying new domestic terrorism law that some have described as the Patriot Act on steroids.
Don
Lemon Launches Another Attack On Trump Supporters; "Living In Fantasyland". Without question, CNN host Don Lemon is one of
the most ineffective 'journalists' on television. He's arrogant. Smug. Lacks self-awareness. And he is so convinced
that he's the only one with the facts on everything he is incapable of grasping reality.
CNN's
Jim Acosta: Trump supporters, Fox News remain 'a threat to our democracy'. CNN chief domestic
correspondent Jim Acosta said Sunday that conservative media like Fox News and the people who continue to support former
President Donald Trump remain "a threat to our democracy." During an appearance on "Reliable Sources," CNN anchor Brian
Stelter said "the world seems a little quiet" after Mr. Trump was permanently banned from Twitter, and he asked
Mr. Acosta whether he thought the quiet was temporary. "I think it is temporary," Mr. Acosta responded.
"I mean, I do think what this country faces right now, and you know, I describe it as the disinformation industrial
complex. And that is Trump and his people, conservative outlets like Fox News, and then conservative websites and
organizations aligned with the president and conservative platforms.
CNN's
Latest Chyron May Be Their Worst Yet, but It Gets Even Worse. Brian Stelter's show is hardly known for hard
hitting, unbiased journalism given who the host and its frequent guests are. It's one of the most laughable pieces of
television on the weekends, reaching levels partisanship that border on parody. Yet, this latest chyron seems a bit
excessive. I mean, at least try to keep the mask on, right?
CNN
Was In On It! Reporter Disguised Herself As Trump Supporter And Plotted With BLM Member. On Thursday
night [1/14/2021], [...] new footage showed CNN's Jade Sacker inside of the Capitol with John Sullivan, the BLM member who
was charged by federal prosecutors for inciting chaos on January 6th. Sacker co-conspired with the liberal activist in
order to cause chaos and make Trump supporters look bad. The shocking video shows her and Sullivan celebrating and
shouting "We did it!" when they got the footage they were looking for. When she asked Sullivan if he was filming, he
said was going to delete it. He never did.
Painting with a broad brush: Don
Lemon Doubles Down; Says ALL Trump Supporters Are Complicit With The KKK. CNN's Don Lemon isn't just the
dumbest man on television, like President Trump has said, he's also one of the most dangerous. While his gaslighting in
the past has no doubt inspired left-wing kooks around the country to at least consider violence against conservatives and
supporters of the president, his recent rhetoric is going to get someone killed one of these days — and when it
happens, he needs to be held legally accountable for it. During his nightly hand-off with another of the network's
lunatics, Chris Cuomo, on Wednesday, Lemon proclaimed that anyone and everyone who voted for the president — that
would be nearly 75 million Americans at last count — was a member of, or aligned with, the Ku Klux Klan, as well
as responsible for the riot-nee-'insurrection' at the U.S. Capitol Building last week.
Cuomo,
Lemon Argue Our Riots Were Cooler Than Yours and 'Justified'. Politically motivated violence is wrong,
disgusting, and not justifiable no matter the cause. But not according to CNN's PrimeTime host Chris "Fredo"
Cuomo and CNN Tonight host Don Lemon. During the Tuesday handoff between their shows, the duo essentially argued
that the Black Lives Matter and Antifa riots from last spring and summer were cooler than last week's Capitol Hill attack
because they were "justified" and the cases were not "apples to apples." [...] Then, ignoring the fact that the leftist riots
racked up over $1 billion in damages and destroyed many lives and livelihoods, Lemon vented. "And listen, I'm glad
you mentioned about being shot by cops because you cannot compare. And I'm sick of people comparing. You can't
compare what happened this summer to what happened at the Capitol. It's two different things," he whined.
CNN
openly trying to ban Fox News, Newsmax, OAN from airwaves with Dem stamp of approval. Fox News and other
right-leaning outlets are being targeted by frenzied Democrats and liberal media calling for them to be deplatformed.
Democrats are using the mob riot at the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday [1/6/2021] to justify demands to pull the plug on what
CNN's Brian Stelter called "dishonest companies that profit off of disinformation and conspiracy theories." CNN's chief
media correspondent made his argument in his newsletter as did Oliver Darcy and others who lack all self-awareness when it
comes to pointing fingers.
The
Great Purge Expands As CNN Sets Its Sights On Fox News' Cable Providers. The 'never let a crisis go to waste'
crew are busily turning Wednesday's Capitol riot into their very own Reichstag fire, using it as the premise by which to ban
President Trump across social media and now, apparently, to go after cable companies for being complicit in "spreading
disinformation" by giving Fox News a platform. Lest you be (justifiably) confused by the meaning of "disinformation,"
remember that it does not include years of the media and Democrats lying about Russia, Russia, Russia, and it most certainly
does not include wild-eyed claims that Trump is a Russian asset. It also does not mean spreading fabulist nonsense
about Trump's response to the Wuhan coronavirus, and it definitely doesn't mean constantly repeating proven falsehoods.
"Disinformation" means only one thing: anything that does not fit the Democrat narrative. The narrative changes with
some frequency, so yesterday's "fact," may well be today's "disinformation."
CNN
mainstreams Kentucky election conspiracy theory. At CNN, "facts first" is just a slogan. Network
contributor Lawrence Wilkerson this week suggested, without evidence, that "there was a little cheating" in the 2020 Kentucky
Senate race when Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell soundly defeated Democratic challenger Amy McGrath. CNN host
Kate Bolduan, who made a minor splash this month when she appeared on-air wearing a $380 custom-made "facts first" sweater,
did exactly nothing to challenge her guest's baseless suggestion. Even more ironic is that Wilkerson's conspiracy
theory mongering came as he alleged, falsely, that Republicans are "never" investigated for election fraud. Did he
manage to sleep through the entire Russia investigation?
Acting
US defense secretary's chief of staff Kash Patel files $50M defamation lawsuit against CNN. Kash Patel, the
chief of staff to Acting Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller, has filed a $50 million defamation lawsuit against CNN and
several of its top reporters, claiming the liberal network published false statements and promoted "unfounded left-wing
political narratives" by painting Patel as a pro-Trump conspiracy theorist seeking to smear President-elect Joe Biden.
The complaint filed on Friday [12/11/2020] in Virginia Circuit Court named CNN reporters Barbara Starr, Zachary Cohen, Ryan
Browne, Alex Marquardt and Nicole Gaouette as defendants, in addition to the network itself. It claims CNN
"deliberately or recklessly conveyed a false message" to sensationalize the "news" and humiliate Patel.
Project
Veritas Exposes How CNN Reacted to the Hunter Biden Story. Project Veritas's James O'Keefe secretly recorded
CNN's morning conference calls for two months, and vowed to release raw audio every day until Christmas. On Wednesday
[12/2/2020], he exposed how CNN strategized after the New York Post's bombshell story on Hunter Biden's emails in the weeks
leading up to the election. While big tech companies censored the story, mainstream media outlets like CNN went along
by simply ignoring it altogether. "Obviously, we're not going with the New York Post story right now on Hunter Biden,"
CNN Political Director David Chalian advised during the Oct. 14 conference call, which is when the Post released its first
story on Hunter's emails. He later said the report was "giving its marching orders" to what the "rightwing echo chamber"
should discuss that day.
CNN
silent as nurse's viral tale of patients denying coronavirus from deathbeds falls apart. CNN is silent after
South Dakota emergency room nurse Jodi Doering claimed on the liberal network that patients dying from coronavirus often
don't believe it despite her story appearing to have been a "massive exaggeration" if not worse. CNN's interview went
viral, with one clip piling up over 5.8 million views on Twitter. NewsBusters conducted a study, indicating that CNN
spent 23 minutes and 38 seconds on Doering's tale over a two-day period. "Of course, CNN has yet to air an
acknowledgment or correction because, when there's a narrative to push, CNN subscribes to the mantra of if it rings true, it
is true," NewsBusters managing editor Curtis Houck wrote.
CNN
Says Americans 'Unlikely' to See Higher Taxes Under Biden. CNN is trying to hoodwink Americans into believing
that their taxes won't increase under a Biden administration. The network's latest article read like a press release by
former Vice President Joe Biden's campaign staff: "The vast majority of Americans are unlikely to see their taxes go up
under President-elect Joe Biden, despite false claims by President Donald Trump to the contrary." The article used the
left-wing Tax Policy Center (TPC) as its source. CNN Politics writer Katie Lobosco, in her piece headlined "Will your
taxes go up under Biden? It's unlikely," reiterated the false Biden campaign position that the tax plan "wouldn't raise
individual taxes on anyone earning less than $400,000 a year, which is more than 90% of taxpayers." That flies directly
in the face of a rare fact check that ABC's Jonathan Karl did on that same Biden claim.
Tammy
Bruce unloads on CNN journo comparing Trump's 4 yrs to Nazis warning Jews. Fox News contributor and
conservative pundit Tammy Bruce leveled CNN's Christiane Amanpour for becoming the latest left-wing journalist to compare
President Donald Trump and his administration to Adolph Hitler and his murderous Nazi regime. In an interview Friday
[11/13/2020] with network host Sean Hannity, Bruce strongly reacted to a clip of Amanpour's Thursday evening broadcast in
which she referenced "Kristallnacht," a 1938 event in which German Nazis attacked Jews and Jewish businesses over the course
of two days.
Atlanta's Election Day Pipe Dream.
Election Day 2020 was unusual for several predictable reasons involving high in-person turnout and veritable avalanches of
mail-in ballots. One exceptionally odd event, however, took everyone by surprise — vote counting suddenly
stopped for hours in several key swing states late Tuesday night. One of these mysterious halts occurred in Fulton
County, Georgia, where election officials insisted that a broken water pipe necessitated a four-hour delay before counting of
absentee ballots could resume. Yet evidence for what would have been quite a serious plumbing issue has been strangely
elusive. There doesn't appear to be any paperwork involving this leak. Atlanta lawyer Paul Dzikowski, like many
of us who vote in Georgia, was interested in the details of an incident serious enough to stop the vote-counting process for
hours yet had been covered only in passing by the news media. As he expressed it in one email to me, "I guess we
shouldn't be surprised that News Corp. from Australia picked up this story from halfway around the world but CNN hasn't
bothered ... even though CNN's headquarters are literally in the same building."
CNN
Refuses to Run Ad Criticizing Biden. You may not have even noticed it if you ever watch the Cable News Network
(CNN), but over the last four years there has been a subtle, nigh-imperceptible shift in attitude toward President Donald
John Trump (R). Back in 2016, CNN cheered Trump's campaign. They gave him countless hours of free airtime and were
absolutely delighted when the GOP nominated him. They couldn't believe their luck! But then Trump... y'know...
won. So now they don't seem to like him quite as much. If you watch carefully and read between the lines,
it's almost as if they're insanely desperate to get him out of the White House.
CNN Misses Revenue Targets
by $100+ Million. The free market appears to be in agreement with a chant often heard at President Donald
Trump's rallies: CNN [is bad]. According to a new report from the Wall Street Journal, the Airport Network is
having as much trouble as the airline industry as of late. [...] CNN has been among those suffering the worst from Trump
Derangement Syndrome in the Trump-era, which has led to a number of notable blunders in their reporting. [List of
examples] That's just to name a handful of examples — but with reporting like that, it's no question why
CNN is having trouble hitting their revenue targets.
Ex-British
ambassador to US probed over alleged relationship with CNN reporter. The feds launched an "unprecedented" probe
into Britain's former ambassador to the US because they feared he was leaking secret White House intel to his alleged
lover — a CNN journalist, according to a sensational new report. The Department of Justice investigation
into Kim Darroch and his alleged relationship with CNN reporter Michelle Kosinski is thought to be the first into a serving
British ambassador in Washington, The Sun reported. "For the US to investigate the most senior diplomat of its greatest
ally on suspicion of leaking secret information is almost unprecedented," a security source told the outlet.
Brian
Stelter Hilariously Proves Trump's Point in Segment Explaining Why CNN Covers Him More Than Biden. [Scroll
down] [T]he media's coverage of Trump isn't so lopsided in comparison to Biden because Trump is allegedly "shocking."
And Biden isn't "protecting his lead in the polls with a less-is-more approach." Biden's lead is not being "protected"
by Biden but instead by "news" networks like CNN who ignore shocking stories that are damaging to Biden's faux "decent guy"
image by keeping the focus on Trump and off of Biden's flubs, gaffes, stumbles and negative news stories that have the
potential to swing voters in Trump's direction. Think about how CNN, for example, "covered" Tara Reade's sexual assault
allegations against Biden. It took them several WEEKS before they first reported on them, and even when they did
they admitted that their reporting relied mostly on what the New York Times and the Washington Post had dug up about
Reade. Even now, several months later, CNN is still not covering Biden like they should be. Instead, they cover
for Biden, as has been evidenced by how they've treated the NY Post's explosive story on Hunter Biden's emails as
fake news.
CNN
Outrageously Gaslights on Court-Packing Issue, but Facts Simply Aren't on Their Side. On Monday, during CNN's
"Newsroom" program, one of their reporters morphed into a Joe Biden campaign spokeswoman on live TV, filing a "report" that
sounded more like campaign talking points than actual reporting. During the segment, CNN correspondent Abby Phillip
made a rather astonishing claim when asked by co-host Poppy Harlow as to why Joe Biden continued to refuse to answer
questions about whether or not he would consider packing the Supreme Court if elected president. Phillip's answer was
to suggest that it was President Trump and other Republicans who put "random ideas" out there like court-packing in an
effort to paint Biden into a corner.
Fredo
Cuomo: Trump Didn't Win Peace Prize Because He Encouraged Terrorism. CNN's Chris Cuomo concluded Friday's
[10/9/2020] Prime Time by mocking President Trump for not winning the Nobel Peace Prize because, according to his
logic, Trump has spent his presidency encouraging domestic terrorism (and therefore lobbying for Joe Biden and the Democrats
to win in November). Specifically, Cuomo sardonically suggested In a factually-challenged and deranged segment that one
reason Trump didn't win after having encouraged the foiled kidnapping plot against Governor Gretchen Whitmer (D-MI).
Cuomo began by taking a shot at Trump and Fox, "Here's something you're not hearing on Fox. Trump didn't win the Nobel
Peace Prize today. Wonder why? Maybe it was failing to call out domestic terror, like the 13 suspects who may
have been acting on his insurrection calls to liberate Michigan." As the facts would show, the accused ringleader
attended a June Black Lives Matter protest after having been, in the words of The Washington Post, "upset about the
killing of George Floyd and police violence." In other words, not exactly a Trump supporter.
The Full Crowley.
[Scroll down] In the debate's aftermath, Obama supporters crowed; Romney sulked that Crowley had hijacked the
debate. And Crowley was never asked to moderate anything important again. CNN offered various defenses.
But, in fact, Crowley's career more or less ended that night and two years later she went into retirement, her finale forever
a reminder of what not to do as a debate moderator and an example of media bias.
Ric
Grenell Tears Into CNN's Jake Tapper for Allowing Jill Biden to Shut Down Question on Biden's Gaffes. That CNN
treats the Biden campaign with kid gloves by routinely "asking" biased questions to senior spokespeople, advisors, and Biden
himself is not a new development. But watching them allow the terms of an interview to be dictated to them as cameras
roll for all to see is something else entirely. On Sunday [9/27/2020], "State of the Union" host Jake Tapper
interviewed the Democratic presidential nominee's wife Jill Biden. As expected, softball after softball was thrown,
with Tapper at times coming off as a campaign spokesman himself. [...] Though it's been said many times before, it needs to
be said again: CNN is not a news network. They just aren't.
CNN now has Amy Coney Barrett to resent and condescend
to. CNN headline writers can sneer like nobody's business. Amy Coney Barrett's nomination to the Supreme
Court gave that network and its progressive allies another opportunity kindle the fires of resentment and condescension while
pretending to neutrality. Somebody asked for an opinion roundup, so the "Baracksters" put the ball in play by damning
with faint praise: "Amy Coney Barrett a perfect choice for half of America" set the tone they were striving for. [...]
Insinuation has a more exalted place in the CNN style guide than logic does, because (as the New York Times has been
demonstrating even longer than CNN) insinuation can advance preferred narratives. CNN would rather you didn't ask if
the late Justice Ginsburg was perfect for (only) half of America, why her go-to move on the Court was writing dissenting
opinions, or why Supreme Court nominations became so contentious in the first place (best to call Roe v. Wade
[and] its companion case, Doe v. Bolton, "settled law" and not look too closely at them).
CNN
Cuts Away as Protesters Drown Out Supreme Court Reporter With "CNN Is Fake News" Chants. A live CNN report on
the nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court was cut short by anchor Wolf Blitzer after hecklers drowned
out reporter Ariane de Vogue with chants of "CNN is fake news!" as she reported from the Supreme Court. Video posted to
Twitter by Seattle talk radio host Jason Rantz shows a crowd of flag waving Trump supporters standing a ways back behind de
Vogue start to loudly chant "CNN is fake news!" and also boo CNN until Blitzer tells de Vogue, "we can barely hear what
you're saying."
The
'Mostly Peaceful' Lie Gets A Thorough, Well-Earned Debunking. Just this month, as a CNN reporter stood in front
of a burning car in riot-torn Kenosha, Wisconsin, the network's chyron at the bottom of the screen said "Fiery but mostly
peaceful protests after police shooting." Sorry, they were not "mostly peaceful," or any of the other false euphemisms
used to describe the violent anarchy erupting in cities across the country. Clearly, this is another case of
journalists caught in a lie by their very own video images. Many other instances of such journalistic gaslighting have
emerged in recent months.
CNN
Defends Not Fact-Checking Joe Biden, It's Alternate Reality Material. Last night, Joe Biden took the stage for
a "town hall" with CNN. I put the description in scare quotes because it was anything but an honest event with normal
citizens. Meanwhile, not once throughout the night did CNN "fact-check" Biden's many lies, misstatements, and outright
ridiculousness (for example, at one point, Biden claimed Trump could have saved every person who died of COVID). The
liberal network was ready with their excuse, though. Brian Stelter's pet, Oliver Darcy, ran cover via his newsletter in
what can only be called pure propaganda on his part. [...] It needs to be pointed out and documented that Biden has an
incredibly long history of lying as a public figure. That's not even debatable and for CNN to pretend otherwise is
deeply dishonest. Let's recall that Biden was made famous for plagiarism, a scandal he got caught up in while running
for President the first time around. He lied about his qualifications and copied others' work. Today, it'd be
brushed off because he's a Democrat, but at the time, it was treated as the low-life move it was. Let's not forget his
smearing of Judge Robert Bork either, which contained numerous misstatements. Biden even lied about the circumstances
of his late wife's car accident, trying to blame a man who was not responsible for what happened. As Vice President,
Biden lied about the Iran deal, he lied about Benghazi, and he lied about Obamacare.
Alan
Dershowitz files $300 million defamation suit against CNN. Famed attorney and Harvard Law School Professor
Emeritus Alan Dershowitz filed a defamation suit against CNN on Tuesday seeking $300 million for what he called a "willful,
deliberate, malicious effort to destroy my credibility." Dershowitz told Fox News that CNN selectively edited a clip of
his remarks from the Senate floor during President Trump's impeachment trial where he broke down the illegalities surrounding
a "quid pro quo" as a member of the president's defense team.
CNN
Erases 'Bay Of Pigs' Award To Accuse Trump Of Making It Up. CNN tried to fact-check President Donald Trump's
weekend claim that he received the "Bay of Pigs" award Sunday by reporting that no such award exists. "For those
confused by Trump's claim he got the 'highly honored Bay of Pigs Award': He got an endorsement in 2016 from the Bay of Pigs
Veterans Association. It's not an award," explained network fact-checker Daniel Dale. [...] The Trump campaign almost
immediately corrected Dale by publishing a photo of the president accepting the award.
CNN's
Jake Tapper Ends Interview After WH Official Blasts Network For Not Being 'Honest'. CNN host Jake Tapper
abruptly ended an interview on Sunday with White House Trade Adviser Peter Navarro after Navarro blasted CNN for not being
"honest with the American people." The interview on CNN's "State of the Union" lasted several minutes before "things
escalated quickly" and "the exchange was abruptly shut down after the conversation devolved into a political fight," Fox News
reported. Tapper accused the Trump administration and Navarro, in response, "flipped the script and accused CNN of
lying to the American people, which led Tapper to end the interview."
CNN's
Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Week. CNN's troubles started on Tuesday, when Fox News host Tucker
Carlson played a tape exposing CNN President Jeff Zucker appearing to offer a quid pro quo to then-candidate Donald Trump in
2016, the New York Post reported. Zucker told Trump lawyer Michael Cohen that he wanted Trump, whom he called
"the boss," to host a weekly show. He also touted the importance of having CNN on Trump's side in the presidential
election. [...] Zucker had worked with Trump as the former CEO of NBC Universal while the network was airing The
Apprentice. "You cannot be elected president of the United States without CNN," the network's president told Cohen.
CNN's
Cillizza: Trump Labeling 'Protests' as 'Riots' a Sign of Desperation. CNN's Chris Cillizza might have
outdone himself over the past weekend. Although he has long had a reputation for extreme silliness, his analysis about
President Donald Trump identifying what are obviously riots as "riots" rather than "protests" are a sign of "desperation,"
according to Cillizza. What made Cillizza's observation particularly absurd was that the picture at the top of his
weekend article (which was updated early Monday morning) showed a large burning building with a couple of armed law
enforcement officers in riot gear in the foreground. However, the true icing on the cake of Cillizza's silliness is
that he not only tweeted his laughable observation but actually included that same picture from the article that completely
undercut himself as you can see below. As a result, Cillizza set himself up for the Mother of All Mockery on
Twitter.
'You're
nothing but a stooge': C-SPAN callers go all in on Brian Stelter and trash CNN as 'the enemy of the truth'. One
of CNN's top political commentators sat through a string of frustrated C-SPAN callers during a Tuesday morning [9/1/2020]
segment on the network. Appearing on C-SPAN's Washington Journal, two separate callers criticized Brian Stelter,
decrying his anti-Trump obsession and accusing his home network of obfuscating the news cycle. One caller from
Minnesota said Stelter's new book, Hoax, is propaganda that would be used to divide the nation during unprecedented levels of
tension across the political aisle. "I don't know if there's any journalists left at CNN, but I know that if I were to
estimate about 300 different distortions or misinformation that we get out of CNN ... if you added all that up to 46 months,
it comes out to be 300,000-plus distortions of truth," the caller said.
The Democrat Party's Riots.
CNN anchors Chris Cuomo and Don Lemon have the collective brain capacity of rising third graders. OK, fair point —
there's no reason for me to insult our children like that. But the one upside of the tumbleweeds blowing through their minds
is that sometimes what the Left is really thinking accidentally rolls out of their mouths. Don Lemon recently called
on Joe Biden to make a speech addressing the riots and explaining how when it comes to reforming the police, he and Kamala
Harris "will take care of this problem" after being elected. "But guess what: the rioting has to stop." Lemon then
revealed the problem: "Chris, as you know, and I know, it's showing up in the polling, it's showing up in focus
groups. It is the only thing — it is the only thing right now that is sticking." Think about what he's
really saying here. "Rioting is fine — but only if it helps us win."
The
Democrats' Laughable 'President Chaos' Strategy. CNN's Don Lemon, one of the dumbest and [most eristic]
Trump-haters, blurted out that as the polls were moving unfavorably, it might be wise for Democratic candidate Joe Biden to
criticize mob violence, something he and his partisans had conspicuously failed to do at their convention the week
before. He did this within a day of his colleague Brian Stelter, who will enter the Guinness Book of World Records for
the frequency of his utterance in reference to President Trump in the last three years, "The walls are closing in,"
righteously wagging his glabrous head at the viewers as he told them that the urban guerrilla violence sweeping the country
really was "peaceful protest." The same assurance was given by correspondents of CNN and the other anti-Trump networks
reporting from riot-torn cities, even as largely minority-owned businesses torched by the "peaceful protesters" belched flame
and smoke behind them.
To
Refute Trump, Jacob Blake's Father Denies Family Has Pastor Days After Family Pastor Speaks At Press Conference. The
father of a 29-year-old domestic violence suspect resisting arrest before a Wisconsin police shooting claimed on CNN Monday [8/31/2020]
the family has no pastor to refute claims by President Donald Trump that Trump spoke with such a minister. "We don't have a family
pastor," Jacob Blake Sr. told CNN's Jim Acosta when asked why the president claimed to have been in contact with the pastor and not the
family directly. [...] If the family has no pastor, the identity of one individual at a Blake press conference last week remains a mystery.
New
Low for CNN: Network Pits Family of Slain Retired Officer David Dorn Against One Another. As you know, CNN is
garbage. Just when you think the network can't go any lower, CNN decides to bring on the family of David
Dorn — the retired African American police officer who was killed at a left-wing riot back in June — to
conduct a Jerry Springer style interview where family members fight over whether or not their slain relative would have
supported President Trump's re-election. Dorn's wife, Ann, gave a heart-wrenching address at the RNC convention,
imploring Americans to end the bloodshed and cast their ballots for President Trump. CNN didn't even care enough about
David Dorn to report his death, which happened at one of those "mostly peaceful" rallies in St. Louis where a "peaceful
protester" — AKA a looter with a gun — shot and killed David Dorn in cold blood. CNN only decided
that Dorn's death was worth reporting when Dorn's widow Ann decided to speak before the RNC convention.
CNN:
There's very little rioting, very little violence. CNN continues to live in an alternative reality where down
is up and up is down. Evidence emerges that Jacob Blake violated a restraining order by entering his ex-girlfriend's
home last Sunday and has an outstanding warrant for sexual abuse. So what does CNN do? They publish a profile of
Blake that paints him as a gentle, caring soul and devoted father. It's entirely possible, I suppose, that both are
accurate, but CNN conveniently omits the details that run counter to its far-left narrative. Ditto for its handling of
the mayhem that continues to grip several of America's Democrat-run cities. CNN would of course ask "What mayhem?"
Here's network contributor Kirsten Powers reciting the party line last Friday. [Video clip]
CNN
reporter tries to debunk black Trump support with wild claim Trump's sending message to 'white America'. CNN
and one of its reporters were slammed for attacking President Trump as a "racial flame-thrower" and analyzing his "appeal to
white voters." During a discussion following Wednesday's [8/26/2020] Republican National Convention, CNN host Anderson
Cooper spoke with a panel of guests which included political reporter Nia-Malika Henderson who presented a head-scratching
argument about Trump's message to white voters that "you won't have to share that power in his America." Henderson
explained "exactly what happened" when the Missouri couple, Mark and Patricia McCloskey, had defended their St. Louis
home from protesters [...] "They drew guns on people who were outside their home on a sidewalk because they were black.
I mean, that's exactly what happened in that instance," Henderson claimed of the McCloskeys.
CNN: The Worst TV Network Ever.
Very few people were watching when Don Lemon made news Tuesday night [8/25/2020], by revealing how deeply his network is
embedded with the presidential campaign of Joe Biden. Discussing the riots in Kenosha, Wisconsin, with fellow CNN
anchor Chris Cuomo, Lemon expressed concern that mob violence would damage the Democrats' chances in November:
["]The rioting has to stop. Chris, as you know and I know, it's showing up in the polling. It's showing
up in focus groups. It is the only thing — it is the only thing right now that is sticking.["]
Question: How does Don Lemon know what people are telling Democratic Party pollsters in focus groups? But asking a
question like that is probably racist. Anyone who doesn't support Biden is a racist, as is anyone who criticizes CNN.
Such simple-minded formulae are CNN's journalistic stock-in-trade nowadays. Mocked four years ago as the "Clinton News
Network," CNN has since then labored diligently to destroy whatever credibility they still had after Hillary's failed campaign.
CNN
Chyron On Kenosha: 'Fiery But Mostly Peaceful Protests After Police Shooting'. A CNN chyron reporting on the
riots exploding in Kenosha, Wisconsin, during the early hours of Tuesday morning [8/25/2020] appeared to have gone
unnoticed. "Fiery But Mostly Peaceful Protests After Police Shooting," the news network's television headline blared
while its reporter, Omar Jimenez, stood in front of several burning cars. The footage features Jiminez explaining to
viewers that while the city burns to the ground behind him, the so-called protesters destroying the blue-collar midwestern
town were being "mostly peaceful."
This Is CNN. CNN reporter
reports in front of a burning building in Kenosha with a chyron that reads "Fiery But Mostly Peaceful Protests After Police Shooting"
CNN'S
Admission: Lemon, Cuomo Say They Don't 'Fact-Check' DNC Because Dems Don't Lie Like Trump. CNN hosts Don Lemon
and Chris Cuomo trashed the Republican National Convention Monday night; saying they don't "fact-check" the Democrats
"because they don't lie like Donald Trump." "Who are people going to believe? We'll see who makes the better
case. You can fact-check it to death, we can fact-check it all night. People say, 'Well you didn't fact-check the
Democrats!' They are not lying the way Trump does!" said Cuomo. "Nobody lies the way this man does, has, and will, that
I've ever seen in politics. So, he's lying to you! These people are all his echo!" added the CNN anchor.
[Video clip]
CNN
Cuts Off Trump Speech, John King Accuses President Of 'Wrong, Misleading, Or Outright Lies'. CNN cut into
President Donald Trump's speech Monday morning at the Republican National Convention in Charlotte to break down the
president's comments. Trump, a frequent critic of ballot harvesting and mail-in voting was speaking on the topic Monday
[8/24/2020] when CNN anchor Anderson Cooper broke into the broadcast to accuse the president of going "negative" in the convention's
"first moments." "He started off falsely attacking mail-in voting," Cooper said. "He's continuing to attack mail-in
voting as his postmaster general testifies that the attacks are 'unhelpful.' That's his own postmaster general. He also
criticized the media for airing the postmaster's hearing instead of his roll call."
Democrats
and NeverTrump carpetbaggers lie about Trump's acceptance speech. The Democrats and their fellow travelers in
the NeverTrump Lincoln Project are terrified that, if Americans hear Trump without mediation, Americans will (a) like what
they hear and (b) know that neither he nor his supporters are racist. (And defamatory racism accusations, of course, are
the biggest sticks with which they can beat conservatives.) So it was that, when Trump appeared in North Carolina to
give his acceptance speech upon receiving the Democrat nomination, CNN cut away from the speech because of alleged "outright
lies." Then, the hate-filled carpetbaggers in the Lincoln Project, a coalition made up of failed Republican campaign
advisors, accused an audience member of calling Obama a "monkey" to Trump's laughing agreement. These are the actions
of ugly and desperate people.
CNN
Reveals Their Excuse to Censor the RNC as Their Self-Awareness Hits Zero. If you thought the media might relax
a bit during the Republican National Convention and not show themselves to be total hacks, you thought wrong. But let's
be serious, no one actually expected anything less. CNN laid out the groundwork this morning for how they will censor
the RNC and keep their chosen narratives on track. The plan was unsurprisingly stated by Brian Stelter on his low-rated
Sunday show. In his comments, he promised that CNN would cut in with "fact-checks" to counter things being said by
Republicans. [...] The lack of self-awareness here is fairly breathtaking. CNN spews misinformation all the time, but
past their own behavior, is the assertion here that the DNC contained no misinformation that needed to be countered? I
ask because CNN did not cut into the Democrat event with "fact-checks" no matter how egregious the lies told go. [...] Yet,
now that the American people might actually get a real counter narrative from the RNC, CNN wants change the rules.
Tucker
Carlson, Greg Gutfeld Dismantle CNN After Claim That No News Orgs Exist To Tear Down Trump. Fox News hosts
Tucker Carlson and Greg Gutfeld slammed CNN on Monday after CNN media reporter Brian Stelter aired a segment over the weekend
claiming that no news organizations existed to tear down President Donald Trump. The segment came as Stelter
aggressively defended presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden over the week, claiming without evidence that
"entire media companies essentially exist to tear down Joe Biden."
The
Mainstream Media Has Betrayed Its Constitutional Privilege. I have had several conversations with people in the
past few days who are completely unaware of just how bad things have gotten in Portland. Many of these people do pay a
fair amount of attention to the news, but they've still missed the Portland stuff. Because it's not in the news.
It is perhaps the biggest news in the country, but it isn't being reported. Portland doesn't fit the narrative.
In fact, it destroys the narrative. Were we to believe the media, what's happening in Portland is merely some mild
unrest being acted out by some restless kids. What's actually happening is such a nightmare that the cops there want to
quit their jobs and peace out. The mainstream media in America is not just irresponsible, it is absolutely delusional
at times. Yesterday [8/9/2020] we witnessed one of the most remarkably out-of-touch moments in modern mainstream media
history when CNN's Brian Stelter wondered aloud if any anti-Trump media existed on the left. It was a truly stunning
question, one that I believe Stelter genuinely doesn't know the answer to because he is so ideologically isolated.
Dr.
Harvey Risch on War Room After CNN Hit Job. Dr. Harvey Risch joins Steve Bannon, Raheem Kassam, and @JackMaxey1 on War
Room: Pandemic right after his appearance on New Day with John Berman where the host attempted to "put words in his mouth." [Video clip]
Lunatic
Trump Nazi Conspiracy Theory Shows CNN Isn't News. On Friday's [7/31/2020] New Day, CNN co-host Alisyn
Camerota and guest host Jim Sciutto brought on former Democratic Governor Jennifer Granholm and Defending Democracy Together
founder Bill Kristol to spout insane conspiracies about President Trump and the upcoming election. Granholm even
suggested that Trump would use a Reichstag Fire like machination to enable him to remain in office: "What if Trump
foments right-wing provocateurs and then sends out the military to put out the fire he created?" Granholm began the
discussion with her unhinged rant against Trump: [Video clip]
Stop Being Nice:
A Rant You're Not Going to Like. America, the land of the free and the home of the brave, isn't living up to
its reputation as either of those things. Social justice has infected everything and turned the United States into the
shadow of its former self. [...] If you want to see how bad it's gotten, here's a perfect example from just this
morning. America's most tertiary network, CNN, told us that "individuals with a cervix" must get cervical cancer
screenings starting at age 25. We have a name for individuals with a cervix. We call them "women."
Cringe News Network won't even say "woman" because the tantrum-throwing radicals on the left would digitally (and maybe even
physically now) storm CNN en masse and punish them for daring to not be "inclusive" enough. The social justice
warriors, as we call them, think they're being heroes but in reality, they're just erasing women by attributing one of the
few things they can do that mean absolutely can't to some guy named Todd who wears a dress and demands you call him
"Sharon." Todd can't have children because he's a man, but simply saying Todd is a man (a basic fact) sends the
modern-day digital Gestapo to your digital door.
CNN
Redefines Women As 'Individuals With A Cervix'. CNN redefined women as "individuals with a cervix" in a tweet
reporting on updated recommendations for cervical cancer screenings from the American Cancer Society Friday [7/31/2020].
"Individuals with a cervix are now recommended to start cervical cancers screening at 25 and continue through age 65, with
HPV testing every five years as the preferred method of testing, according to a new guidelines released by the American
Cancer Society," CNN published.
Chris
Cuomo Proves He's an Idiot, Ridiculously Dishonest, Or Both. CNN's Chris Cuomo has had some banner moments when
it comes to outright lying on his show. After all, this is the same guy who staged a "resurrection" scene of him
emerging from his basement, healed of the coronavirus. In reality, he had been out several times, including traveling
when he was supposed to be under quarantine. CNN has yet to offer any real explanation for how that was
presented. But there's something different about choosing to stare into the camera to repeat a bald-faced lie while
claiming to be an objective "journalist." That's exactly what Cuomo did last night, and to be clear, I'm not talking
about political spin. That's to be expected. I'm talking about actually lying about economic numbers that any
random intern could have told him were wrong.
Another Year of Torrential
Media Bias. Today's CNN is so hopelessly biased it makes the days of Ted Turner look journalistically
rigorous. Back then, at least a few CNN hosts would fake up a just-the-facts mien. Now every last CNN host is a
strident anti-Trump pundit. It is all opinion, all the time, as hosts search high and low for every conceivable angle
from which to attack Trump. The hosts will often preface these tendentious segments with a little lecture to the
audience on how CNN deals in "facts" but the president peddles "lies." One would think the country was on the brink of
dissolution from the tone of CNN's hysterical coverage. Instead, what usually occasions it is nothing more than an
imprecise presidential tweet.
Study:
CNN Media Unit of Stelter & Darcy 'Reliably' Obsessed with 'Right-Wing' Media. David Rutz at the Washington
Free Beacon took the time to confirm what everyone conservative could suspect: CNN's Media Unit obsesses over
conservative or "far-right" media, and defends the left-wing press as somehow non-ideological. [...] Fox News is an outlier
in a sea of Democrat-enabling media, but that makes them "outsized" only in the sense that there's any pushback on a
tremendously hostile media establishment. The Left seems outraged that anyone dares to define "news" differently than
they do, and refuses to bury stories or narratives they want buried.
Rooting
for the Virus? CNN Boasts Pandemic Is 'Beating' 'Irrelevant' Trump 'Badly'. Through its rhetoric on the
coronavirus pandemic, CNN has made it abundantly clear its goal has been to send Americans into mentally-crippling fear over
the coronavirus pandemic and blaming President Trump directly for the rampant loss of life. Thursday's Situation
Room did that in reacting to the White House Coronavirus Task Force briefing, bragging that "the chickens [have come]
home to roost" for the "dishonestly rosy" Trump as it's "beating him and beating him badly." In other words, optimism
and hope for tomorrow is poisonous to the health of CNN's narrative. There's an obvious balance between denial of the
pandemic's seriousness and outright doom and gloom, but CNN has never been concerned about that or our collective psyche.
CNN
Reporter Melts Down After Trump Campaign Spox Uses CNN Link to Disprove Her Coronavirus Claims. CNN anchor
Brianna Keilar had Trump campaign communications director Tim Murtaugh on the network earlier today to talk about the Trump
administration's Wuhan virus response. As things often do on CNN when a Trump official is part of a segment, the
interview got contentious fast. Keilar disputed numerous claims made by Murtaugh, including statements about how
Dr. Anthony Fauci has recommended the use of the Trump-touted hydroxychloroquine and how some studies have shown it's an
effective drug when used in concert with other treatments. You'll remember that the media and Democrats have spent
almost the entirety of the outbreak trying to downplay the drug as a possible coronavirus treatment because Orange Man
Bad. Studies have been mixed on it, with some showing some successes in using the drug and others not. Some of
the studies the media have definitively touted as debunking the idea of using hydroxychloroquine as a treatment either used
flawed methodology (read about another one [elsew]here), were discredited, or were actually retracted.
CNN
Pushes Joe Biden As A 'Man Of Faith' Who Can Win Over Evangelical Voters. The liberal media mocks and
disrespects people of faith in America all the time. But now that we have an election coming up, CNN rushes in to prop
up Joe Biden as some sort of deeply religious man, suggesting he can appeal to evangelicals.
CNN
Is Obsessed With Latest Trump Tell-All Book. Maybe Someone Should Write a Book About CNN? CNN is obsessed
with yet ANOTHER "tell-all" book about Donald Trump. The network doesn't care if these products are true, just that
they trash the President. If CNN is SO interested in tell-all books, maybe someone should write one about the liberal
cable channel. How would they like that? On Wednesday morning's [1/15/2020] New Day, CNN co-hosts
John Berman and Alisyn Camerota brought on political correspondent Sara Murray and political commentator Errol Louis to hype
Mary Trump's book and to make outrageous claims about the president's supporters. Without any fact checking, the hacks
took the claims that Mary Trump makes about President Trump at face value in an effort to make it a campaign issue.
Louis also venomously declared that Trump supporters are white "supremacists" and that they are "those who were always
opposed to all of the civil rights movement from the 1960s forward."
Juvenile
Hack Cooper Snarks Over 'Tan Man' Trump, Claims He Doesn't Care About Dead Americans. Having long since lost
any semblance of sanity as a real journalist, CNN's AC360 host and pundit Anderson Cooper began Tuesday's [7/14/2020]
show with a predictably sophomoric commentary masquerading as journalism with the chyron labeling it a "Keeping Them Honest"
segment. This time, Cooper employed his usual condescension, feigning of outrage, pauses, sighs, and slight tilts of
the head to attack "artificially tan man" President Trump as someone who should be removed from his job. Worse yet,
Cooper insisted Trump possessed no concern for the 136,000-plus dead Americans from the coronavirus.
CNN's
Cuomo Admits Homicides Are Rising — But Blames It On States Reopening. CNN's Chris Cuomo admitted
Wednesday evening that homicides are rising, but appeared to place the blame on states reopening rather than ongoing protests
calling to defund the police. Cuomo, alongside CNN's Don Lemon, mocked "right-wing" media just one day earlier for
reporting on rising crime in major cities — although statistics show that many cities have, indeed, seen rising
crime. Cuomo appeared to backtrack Wednesday, admitting that homicides are spiking but claiming it is due to reopening
the economy.
Not
All Black Lives Matter to Black Lives Matter. This week, CNN's Don Lemon, who has spent the last few weeks
bashing the supposed thoroughgoing systemic racism of the United States, hosted black actor Terry Crews. [...] Black Lives
Matter, as Crews correctly pointed out, has never restricted its mandate to the question of police violence: It has
announced that its focuses also include police brutality, transgender rights, gay rights, disrupting the nuclear family, and
freeing Palestine, among other diverse topics. So why is Lemon so deeply invested in preventing conversations about
black lives? Why, in fact, do only some black lives matter, rather than all? That's not merely a question asked
by conservatives or contrarians. It's being asked all over the United States by black Americans being left to the
predations of criminals, in large part thanks to the woke virtue signaling of many Black Lives Matter leaders and media allies.
CNN's
Lemon: The Way to Fix Mount Rushmore Is Add Obama. Tuesday on CNN, host Don Lemon said President Barack
Obama should be added to the Mount Rushmore sculptures of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, and Theodore
Roosevelt. While discussing a California couple charged for painting over a "Black Lives Matter" mural, Lemon said, [...]
Lengthy quote omitted for brevity, among other things.
CNN
Actually Made an 'Outrageous' Claims List About Trump's Mt. Rushmore Speech. President Trump visiting
Mount Rushmore sent the liberal media into a total meltdown yesterday. The fallout is still doling out insane attacks
against a speech that was patriotic and attacked the Left's ongoing campaign to erase our history. Yeah, it's pretty
explicit as to why the media is hyperventilating right now. One, Trump is still president. Two, he's
Republican. And three, he's a cheerleader for America — how awful, right? Well, CNN, the go-to for
garbage anti-Trump takes, decided to compile a list of the most "outrageous" claims made by the president last night.
I'm not kidding. And, uh, for those of us who aren't mind-broken by Trump or are normal in cognitive function, you're
going to find this list confusing. Why? There's nothing outrageous about it; Trump just said it so these clowns
go into an epileptic fit.
CNN's
Chris Cuomo Makes an Utter Fool of Himself Interviewing St. Louis Homeowner, Gets Corrected Multiple Times. As we've
previously documented, CNN's supposedly objective "Prime Time" anchor Chris Cuomo has proven himself to be an outright embarrassment to
his profession, frequently coming into interviews unprepared and always with a predetermined angle to exploit. In addition to that,
Cuomo has also shown himself to be a generally awful person and hypocrite, unwilling to hold himself (and Democrats) to the same standards
he holds everyone else to. Cuomo proved his critics right once again in every way Tuesday night [6/30/2020] in the "interview" he
conducted with St. Louis, Missouri homeowner Mark McCloskey, 63, and his attorney Albert Watkins.
CNN
picked the wrong person to interview about police and BLM. What's a CNN host to do when confronted with a guest
who doesn't accept The Narrative? In the case of Don Lemon interviewing former Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke,
the answer is: tell him to "keep it down," refuse to listen to what he is saying, and then abruptly cut him off. It's
not as if they are interested in anything that doesn't support The Narrative. Much less explodes it with data on cops
being killed. [Video clip]
Unhinged
CNN Spends Two Hours Mocking Rally, Questioning Trump's Health. Why would CNN even bother going live on
Saturday night [6/20/2020] for Donald Trump's rally in Tulsa, Oklahoma? The network didn't plan to show the
event. Instead, reporters spent two hours gloating over a lower crowd size and questioning Trump's fitness to
serve. After warning for a week about the health risk of attending the rally, Blitzer opened the show at 8 PM this
way: "But in a surprising development, turnout for the event has been smaller than expected. The campaign is
blaming protesters. The campaign is blaming the news media for the crowd size. Clearly, not a full house."
Reporter Ryan Nobles declared victory even before the speech had begun: "Wolf, the Trump campaign was hoping that they
were going to be able to demonstrate an enormous amount of enthusiasm behind the campaign and also make the point and the
economy were ready to reopen. And at least by their own standards, fell short of those goals." "They certainly did,"
cheered Blitzer.
Trump
Supporter Bruce Carter, Who Happens To Be Black, Busts CNN Using Him To Create Fake News. This video is buckets of
priceless. During a Right Side Broadcast livestream interview of President Trump supporters at the Tulsa rally, RSBN journalist
Liz Willis interviews Bruce Carter, a black Trump supporter. During the interview Ms. Willis mentions the media, and
that's when Mr. Carter shares an example from moments before where CNN used him to create fake news. Carter says
"but you just mentioned the news, so someone just sent me this clip with me on CNN sometime this morning..."
Apparently CNN used a picture of Bruce Carter to frame an angry narrative that "Tulsa Braces For Clashes". This is
priceless. [Video clip]
Trump
Campaign Calls CNN's Brian Stelter 'Sexist' for Attack on Jenna Ellis. President Donald Trump's re-election
campaign accused CNN media reporter Brian Stelter of sexism on Sunday [8/14/2020] for telling campaign legal adviser Jenna
Ellis that her children and grandchildren would be ashamed of her one day. In what Mediaite called a "trainwreck"
interview on Stelter's show, Reliable Sources, the host quizzed Ellis about the campaign's threat to sue CNN over a
poll last week that showed former Vice President Joe Biden fourteen points ahead.
CNN's
Brian Stelter goes on the attack, only to have his prey turn on him. Brian Stelter, aged 34, rotund, and
squeaky, went from creating a college blog about TV and cable news, to working as a media reporter at the New York Times
right out of college, to becoming the host of CNN's (ahem) Reliable Sources and a chief media correspondent. He's had
that last gig for seven years. Stelter thinks he's a journalist. However, when he had senior Trump legal adviser
Jenna Ellis on his Sunday show and tried to humiliate her for daring to support Trump's entirely accurate attacks against the
drive-by media, Ellis called Stelter out for what he is: An activist, rather than a journalist. Before diving
into the Ellis beatdown on Stelter, it's worth remembering that Stelter does not report on the news. Instead, he serves
as a conduit for the Democrat party.
Gathering
Is Essential — Unless You're Republican. It was an "ugly and dangerous scene." Rioters hijacking
protests? Cops murdered? Minority communities devastated? No, this was CNN's description of Americans
packed into Michigan's Capitol in opposition to Gov. Gretchen Whitmer's unconstitutional decree that made abortion
clinics essential during the stay-at-home order, but barbershops not. "Protests are supposed to be peaceful," CNN
sneered, as Michiganders — some armed — peacefully gathered to demand their rights back. Now,
when streets are filled with George Floyd marchers and rioters, Chris Cuomo wonders since when protests had to be "peaceful,"
anyway? The answer: 1791.
Kayleigh
McEnany shreds Jim Acosta after he criticizes police. White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany suggested
CNN's Jim Acosta should respect police officers rather than concoct stories about them since they are "protecting you as you
come into this building each and every day." The tense exchange began with Acosta falsely accusing the President of having
"gassed and pummeled protesters" as he engaged in a walk Monday to St. John's Episcopal Church. [...] Acosta has been
brutally beaten by McEnany on multiple occasions as he does his best to preen for his left-leaning audience at CNN. Things
never work out in his favor.
McEnany
pounds Acosta with facts on what really went down at Lafayette Square, he still can't comprehend. White House
press secretary Kayleigh McEnany fact-checked CNN chief White House correspondent Jim Acosta this Wednesday after he spewed a
blatant lie at her. The lie was the fallacious and already debunked claim that the Trump administration had "gassed and
pummeled protesters" prior to President Donald Trump's "powerful" walk to St. John's Church earlier this week. To
make matters worse, he spewed the lie while referencing deceased civil rights hero and legend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
The
Media Are Lying To You About Everything, Including The Riots. [Scroll down] Every once in a while, you
get a pundit who's so bad at lying, so unconvincing in his role as a serious newsman, the mask slips. Often, that
pundit is CNN's Don Lemon, a not-very-bright man with a penchant for letting his mask slip — like when he lost it
on-air laughing at a stupid joke about how Trump supporters are ignorant rubes. On Sunday [5/31/2020], as American
cities were burning and looters were rampaging through the streets, Lemon implored America, "Open your eyes. We are
teetering on a dictatorship." He didn't mean a dictatorship of the mob, which would have actually made sense given the
facts. No, for Lemon and his CNN colleagues the real threat is Trump, who had the audacity to declare that if mayors
and governors couldn't get their cities under control, he would.
CNN
Is Basically InfoWars Now as Don Lemon Has a Mental Break Live on Air. CNN's evening broadcasts are typically a
lesson is partisan ridiculousness, which would be somewhat palatable if they didn't pretend that their prime time lineup are
unbiased journalists. But last night [6/1/2020] was different. Last night, we witnessed CNN walk up to the edge
of the cliff and jump off with a mixture of hysterical laughter and mumbling about aliens. [...] This came shortly after a
fairly mundane speech by the President in which he warned that he would take action against widespread violence and looting
currently hampering many cities. Somehow, that was code to Don Lemon that we are now about to become a dictatorship and
that a declaration of war has been made on Americans. This is the kind of delusion that used to get you thrown into a
straight jacket, not broadcast on national TV.
Activism,
Not Journalism: CNN Correspondent Explains Rioting as Done Out of 'Pain,' Racism. A few hours after an
emotional moment on CNN in which national correspondent Sara Sidner asked a question of Minneapolis Police Chief Medaria
Arradondo on behalf of the late George Floyd's family, Sidner reflected on it and, with help from Prime Time host
Chris "Fredo" Cuomo, she explained to viewers why there's been widespread looting and rioting. The excuse? Well,
it's because of the (real) "pain" from racism that racial minorities have experienced for far too long.
CNN's
Gergen Calls It 'Nuts' for Bill Barr to Urge 'Law and Order'. Late Saturday afternoon [5/30/2020], during live
coverage of the protests and riots in reaction to the police-involved death of Minneapolis resident George Floyd, CNN host
John Berman and senior political analyst David Gergen fretted over Attorney General Bill Barr calling for "law and order" in
a statement addressing the violence. Gergen called the choice of words a "dog whistle" and declared it to be "nuts"
that it was included in the statement.
Don
Lemon blames Trump for Democrat riots, says we asked for it. Protests are only dangerous if the right-wing
Americans hold them according to the media, although the right didn't damage a thing and merely wanted to go back to
work. Just ask Don Lemon, he said the right-wing protests were dangerous, but he has no problem with the Democrat
riots, which he still refers to as protests. Don Lemon fanned the flames on his show last night, continuing to blame
President Trump for the Democrat riots. He believes the riots are all understandable and we are all to blame for
this. It's our fault that criminals and rioters are going scorched earth. They're just frustrated and their
behavior is "tragic" and "understandable."
Watch
These Smug CNN Promos Touting Their Own Riots Coverage, Reporter Being Arrested. Don't let any national
journalist tell you that they don't want to be a part of the story. On Friday night [5/29/2020] into early Saturday
morning, CNN eagerly turned around not one but two promos touting their coverage of the Minneapolis riots, including the
disturbing and despicable arrest of correspondent Omar Jimenez and his crew less than 24 hours prior on New Day.
So, our New York and Washington-based journalists want to claim that they're uncomfortable with the spotlight? Either
that's a total lie or they should have a word with their bosses about whether their dangerous work should translate into
stardom and hero worship. [Video clip]
CNN
Host Insists Voter Fraud is 'Basically Nonexistent', Gets Schooled by Alabama Sec of State. As Democrats use
the "gift" of the pandemic to push voting by mail, arrogant CNN host Brianna Keilar asked her guest, Alabama Secretary of
State John Merrill, if he's "aware that the research shows that in-person voting is more likely to result in voter fraud,
which, overall, is basically nonexistent?" I'd like to take a look at the research she was referring to that produced such
an obviously inaccurate result. Maybe according to the Brennan Center for Justice, as in John Brennan, that's a
truthful statement. However, the evidence shows that mail-in votes are far more likely to be compromised than in-person
votes, and rather than being "basically nonexistent" as Keilar maintains, voter fraud happens with great frequency. She
is well aware of that. Throughout their discussion, Keilar maintained a thinly disguised look of scorn on her face and
continually interrupted Merrill.
'That
is a false statement': Liberal law professor slams CNN for coverage of edited clip favoring Biden.
Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley criticized CNN for "media indulgence" after they ran a selectively edited clip
favorable to former Vice President Joe Biden. "CNN's John King just began a question on how 'some are trying to make a
big deal over' Biden's 'you're not black' comment," Turley, a self-described liberal and George Washington University law
professor said on Twitter. "CNN then played the clip ending with 'I extended the Voting Rights Act 25 years. I
have a record that is second to none.'" "However, the quote was edited to exclude the next line: 'The NAACP has
endorsed me every time I've run. Come on, take a look at my record.' That is a false statement that the NAACP has
publicly rebutted.
CNN
Reporter Who Chastised Trump for Non-Mask Usage Rips off Mask the Moment She Thinks the Cameras Are Off. It's
almost like all these reporters wearing masks while not being within 10 feet of anyone are just virtue signaling to push a
partisan narratives. Crazy thought, right? CNN's Kaitlin Collins, who has tried to make a name for herself by
getting into confrontations throughout the Wuhan virus pandemic (see Dr. Birx Takes CNN Reporter Apart After Attempted
Gotcha Question), was caught red-handed yesterday. As the press briefing ended and the cameras were assumed off, the
"journalist" jumped out of her seat and ripped her mask off, even as she immediately walked closer to her colleagues.
CNN
Spent Nearly Two Years Lapping Up Schiff's Collusion Lies. For nearly two years, CNN eagerly offered itself up
as a platform for House Democrat Adam Schiff and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper to claim there was
"significant evidence" of collusion between the 2016 Trump campaign and Russia. But after the May 7 release of
transcripts in which numerous top-level Obama officials admitted they'd seen no evidence of collusion, CNN should be
embarrassed by their cozy relationship with Schiff and others who strung the liberal cable network along for 22 months.
Clapper himself was among the officials interviewed by the House Intelligence Committee. On July 17, 2017, the former
DNI admitted under oath: "I never saw any direct empirical evidence that the Trump campaign or someone in it was
plotting/conspiring with the Russians to meddle in the election." [Video clip]
Obama
Hatched the Coup in an Oval Office Meeting on January 5, 2017. [Scroll down] CNN has had a meltdown over
this. CNN's meltdown yesterday and last night was total. And they're not even covering it today. The entire
foundation, the entire reason that the American media has been getting up and going to work for the past three years just
blew up in their faces yesterday. There has never been anything they assured us there was. There was no
collusion. There was no Trump as a Russian agent. There was no Russian interference in the election or the
outcome. The Russians had nothing to do with who won and who lost the election. There was never any evidence
suggesting that they did play any role. Folks, this is the biggest political scandal certainly in my lifetime. It
was the complete array of the Washington establishment against one man, Donald Trump. And it was purposed to destroy
him, his family, his career, his businesses and to get him out of office and to reverse the election results of 2016. And
they never had a shred of evidence for any of it.
The Chicom News Network.
Bill Weir hates Jesus, America, and the internal combustion engine — not necessarily in that order. His job
as Chief Climate Correspondent at CNN gives Weir ample opportunity to express his hatred of America's petroleum-consuming
habits, but it was not until recently that Weir explained how he blames Christianity for the world's problems. In a
bizarre online essay entitled "To my son, born in the time of coronavirus and climate change," Weir implies that the pandemic
is somehow related to global warming, connected by "stories in a very old book" (i.e., the Bible) to explain why "we burned
gasoline for no good reason." Does that make sense? No, not logically, but Weir's emotional gestalt pattern connects
these dots without regard to logic.
What
does CNN know about the Biden assault allegation that we don't? Thanks to New York Times Executive
Editor Dean Baquet's admission that their extraordinarily late piece on Reade's allegation was stealth-edited after
interference from the Biden campaign, we already know that Team Biden is actively shaping media coverage of the allegation
and, more worrisome, that supposedly independent media organizations are complying. Given CNN's relative silence on the
Reade allegation, the network's top bosses' toxic obsession with Trump, and the size of the Larry King Live archive on
Google Play, it cannot possibly be ruled out that the episode's disappearance was the result of Biden-backing CNN executives
intentionally memory-holing it. Now tell me, do you corrupt your credibility so thoroughly when you think a man is innocent?
The Wolf who cried
boy. After weeks of taking endless and often irrelevant questions daily from a hostile press, President Donald
John Trump took none at Friday's briefing on corona virus. Wolf Blitzer of AT&T's Cosmic Nonsense Network called the
president chicken for not indulging a self-important press with a moment to pretend they are as important as the
president. La dee dah. His network airs the least amount of these daily briefings among the 3 major cable news
channels. It is pretty difficult to make the case that you are interested in informing the public when you don't show
the press briefings.
Following
Backlash, CNN Scrambles To Stealth Edit Article Repeating Chinese PLA Propaganda. CNN scrambled to quietly edit
an article repeating Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) propaganda Wednesday morning following backlash. The
article, published April 13, relies on a report from the PLA claiming that their Navy "has done a much better job controlling
coronavirus than the US Navy." Portions of CNN's write-up are extremely similar to the PLA's military press release.
The Daily Caller first reported on CNN's PLA propaganda push using a blurb from their "live updates" page, which appears to
have been published shortly before the longer, separate article that has since been updated.
Biden's
Running Mate Has Been Picked For Him. This, in part explains the moving goalposts for the current
pandemic. Over the weekend, CNN's Jake Tapper among others mysteriously began asking if it will be safe to vote in
November. Huh? I thought we were talking about May 1st as a target date to get the country up and running
again. Why ask about six months from now? It's not unlike a player faking an injury in the last minutes of the
game when they have no timeouts left. Stretch the clock. Buy some time. Sew confusion and new
narratives. "What if it's unsafe to vote? How can we trust Trump won't try to screw us out of voting? What
if Trump tries to suppress the vote?" Just pick your wild-eyed narrative now. Should the economy rebound and
Trump look like he could win re-election, they're going to need a new Russia scandal to blame.
It's
Good to Be a Democrat. Joe Biden, the presumptive Democratic Party nominee, has been credibility accused of
sexual assault by a former staffer named Tara Reade. Don't search her name on CNN's website. As of this writing
they have not done a single report about her and her story. They don't care. Moreover, they don't want their
audience to know. But audiences do know. Thanks to the Internet, the old liberal tactic of ignoring stories they
don't like can't work anymore.
CNN's
bad week gets worse when DNI busts network for running 'inaccurate' anti-Trump story. CNN is just not having a
good week, it seems. While harrumphing over a claim Vice President Mike Pence's office was not allowing the nation's
top health officials to appear on CNN to discuss the coronavirus outbreak, the network got busted running with a story that
the office of the director of national intelligence told them contained "inaccurate information." As part of an ongoing
media campaign to suggest that Trump was slow to respond to the Chinese virus COVID-19, thus costing thousands of American
lives, CNN run with a report that said the president was warned "as early as November" about the virus. The network
appears to exist in a bubble all to itself, oblivious to the reality that many Americans see its obsession with trying to
destroy Trump and agree with the president that CNN is indeed "fake news."
Study:
While CNN Bashes Trump, They Barely Covered Virus Outbreak. CNN's latest Trump-bashing narrative is something
to the tune of: Everyone knew the coronavirus was a serious problem in January, and everyone was taking it immensely
seriously except for President Trump and his incompetent administration. Yet a Media Research Center analysis finds
CNN's own coverage of the virus in January and early February was incredibly deficient, as the liberal cable network was
reluctant to devote much time to anything unrelated to Trump's impeachment. MRC analysts examined all of CNN's daily
programming from 6:00 am to midnight EST between January 17 (the first day any news network discussed the coronavirus)
through February 5. Our analysts found that CNN's January coronavirus airtime averaged 12 minutes per day, or about
40 seconds per hour. That works out to a meager 1.6 percent of their total coverage, even after excluding an average
of 21 minutes of ad time per hour on the network. By comparison, the three major broadcast networks (ABC, CBS, and NBC)
projected a clear sense of urgency from the start.
Coronavirus
Consequences Coming into View. The new Democratic pre-electoral chorus is already audibly arising like a
Wagnerian finale from the largely hidden choir. [...] CNN's Brian Stelter, one of the battle-scarred, grizzled, veterans of
the Long March of media Trump-haters, choreographically synchronized with the Washington Post, New York Times,
and MSNBC, has already kicked off this new campaign, on the air and on the internet. [...] For so long Stelter has uttered
the old stock phrases "walls are closing in," and "the drip, drip, drip," and the almost daily "bombshell" of each new
damaging allegation (that evaporated overnight), that he could be operating on autocue as he storms out of the firehall
again, tearing through the pandemic-deserted streets to assault the president on a completely spurious charge one more
time. No one can deny the vigor and imperishability of the hate and vitriol that propels the president's media enemies
again and again, no matter how often they are mowed down by the facts.
Does
America need Journalists? I generally believed the national press corps had hit rock bottom somewhere between
Russian Roulette, Brett Kavanaugh, and the Ukrainian Money Club. But that was before COVID-19. They have since dug
through the rock bottom to new depths. These aren't journalists on display. They are vile anti-American partisan
activists, or to put it in terms CNN might understand, an apple is never a banana. As for our intrepid
hero, Cilliza, I suffered through his last eight articles at the time of this writing out of a morbid sense of curiosity to
see how a real journalist who wears an ugly sweatshirt writes. Every single article was an attack on the president or
another Republican or spun as great news for Democrats, with wishful thinking for a future President Cuomo thrown in for
size. That's what it means to be a journalist who "cuts through the political spin," as his description on CNN heralds.
Dr.
Fauci Slaps Down CNN's Jim Acosta Attempt To Say Trump's Coronavirus Response Was Too Slow. CNN reporter Jim
Acosta attempted to get Dr. Anthony Fauci to say the President didn't react quickly enough to the coronavirus
crisis. In fact, he said the exact opposite. Acosta inquired as to whether or not the administration had taken
enough action when countries such as South Korea and China were grappling with the outbreak. The exchange between him
and Fauci took place during Tuesday's coronavirus task force briefing.
CNN
Analyst: It's 'Ridiculous' Trump Thinks 'We're Rooting Against Him in This Crisis'. President Trump
pushed back at CBS reporter Paula Reid on Wednesday when she pushed the usual "nonpartisan experts say you're all wrong" line
on him. After the live briefing, CNN host Wolf Blitzer turned to in-house analysts Daniel Dale — the "fact
checker" — and Gloria Borger. Dale didn't check any facts, lamely noticing that Trump can't have any rallies,
but he repeats his catch phrases like "big beautiful wall." Thanks, genius. Then Wolf Blitzer turned to Borger
to lament the attack on those Nonpartisan Journalists. [Video clip]
CNN
Twitter account claimed date of Ohio primary has been changed. It hasn't. CNN's Twitter account has over
45 million followers. Many of them are in Ohio. According to a Tweet by CNN, Tuesday's primary election has been
moved to June. It has not. Will Twitter suspend the account for spreading false election information? Their
Terms of Service indicate they should, and they have suspended much smaller accounts in the past for even making jokes that
seem to be election date, time, or location "disinformation."
CNN's
Jake Tapper Admits He Allowed Ocasio-Cortez to Lie About Trump. CNN's Jake Tapper is admitting he knew
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) told a lie about President Trump on his Sunday show and he chose to not challenge
or correct her. This is a remarkable admission from an increasingly unstable CNN anchor, who just last week demanded
the American president stop communicating directly with the American people.
Coronavirus and the Party
of Death. On the coronavirus channel, CNN, one can always count on regular updates about the number of
fatalities from the virus. In hushed tones, the hosts reveal that the "number has reached 150." Imagine such hosts
speaking so gravely about the number of deaths each day from abortion, which is around 4,000. Imagine them putting that
number in a box on the bottom of the screen. Of course, it would never happen. Most of the pundits on CNN who
hysterically swoon over coronavirus cases and deaths support abortion and euthanasia.
Chris
Cuomo blasts Trump for saying 'Chinese virus': 'It could have come from anywhere'. CNN commentator Chris Cuomo
admonished President Trump for repeatedly calling the coronavirus "the Chinese virus." "Calling it the Chinese virus or the
Wuhan virus or the Kung Flu. Listen, you may think it's clever, but it's hurting," Cuomo said on his nightly show on
Wednesday. "The idea, 'Well, it did come from China.' Then why doesn't Fauci and other top health officials, why don't
they call it that? You know why? Because it could have come from anywhere." The virus, which has sparked a global
pandemic, is believed to have originated in an animal market in Wuhan, China. Trump has said he uses the phrase
"Chinese virus" for accuracy purposes. Critics say Trump is being racist or is scapegoating.
All
the Establishment Media's Dangerous Coronavirus Lies. America's deeply unserious but very corrupt and
unreliable establishment media have no intention of changing their dangerous ways in the age of the Wuhan coronavirus.
Watching the media spread lies and unnecessary panic over the last few weeks reminds me of the CNN Race Riots of 2014. [...]
The lies and hate spread by the corporate media resulted in multiple nights of rioting in the working class, predominantly
black city of Ferguson, Missouri. Then, like a plague of locusts, and apparently under the impression the city doesn't
already have enough problems, CNN moved on to Baltimore. [...] Coronavirus is not a D.C. food fight. Like the CNN Race
Riots of 2014, it affects everyday people: we have shut down our economy. The stock market is going insane.
People are scared, worried, stressed, and have reason to be. Even if you remove the fear of the virus, no one can
escape the fear of the panic, and the media's blatant lies are only adding to this uncertainty and fear — and are
doing so by design.
Pence
Spox: CNN's Jim Sciutto Spreads Fake News of Nationwide Curfew. Vice President Mike Pence's Press
Secretary called out CNN's Jim Sciutto Monday morning for spreading an anonymous claim that the Trump administration is
considering imposing a curfew across the country. "New: There are active discussions within the Trump
administration to encourage a possible 'curfew' across the nation in which non-essential businesses would have to close by a
certain time each night," Sciutto wrote on social media, citing "CNN reporting."
CNN
Spins Biden Lying, Cursing Out Voter: 'Some People See That as Charming'. How many gaffes and hostile
interactions with voters does 2020 Democrat frontrunner Joe Biden have to make before the media notices or cares? On
Tuesday morning Biden was caught in yet another uncomfortable moment, cursing and lying to a man who confronted him during a
campaign stop over his stance on guns. Instead of ignoring the incident as they typically do, CNN decided to cover for
Biden by spinning it positively and refraining from fact-checking.
Dershowitz:
I'm Thinking of Suing CNN for Their Lies. CNN, along with other media, pride themselves on testing statements
made by presidential candidates and others for their truthfulness or falsity. But who is testing the truthfulness or
falsity of statements made by CNN and other media? A case in point. CNN repeatedly claimed and continues to claim
through its reporters and talking heads — that during the impeachment trial I had told senators, in the words of
Paul Begala, that presidents are "immune from every criminal act, so long as they could plausibly claim they did it to
boost their re-election effort." Some talking heads went so far as to say that I told the senate that a president could shoot
his opponent, or tamper with voting machines, as long as he believed his re-election was in the public interest. Joe
Lockhart compared me to Hitler, Stalin, and Mussolini and said my argument would lead to genocide. A simple
truth-check, if CNN had bothered to conduct one, would have shown that I said exactly the opposite of what CNN said I
had said[.]
Trump
campaign sues CNN over 'false and defamatory' statements, seeks millions in damages. President Trump's
re-election campaign filed a libel lawsuit against CNN on Friday for publishing "false and defamatory" statements about
seeking Russia's help in the 2020 election. "The complaint alleges CNN was aware of the falsity at the time it
published them but did so for the intentional purpose of hurting the campaign while misleading its own readers in the
process... the campaign filed this lawsuit against CNN and the preceding suits against The New York Times and The Washington
Post to hold the publishers accountable for their reckless false reporting and also to establish the truth," Senior Legal
Adviser to Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. Jenna Ellis told Fox News.
TV Networks, Led
By CNN And MSNBC, Have Aired Misleading Bloomberg Ad More Than 70 Times. TV networks, led by CNN and MSNBC, have
aired a Michael Bloomberg ad more than 70 times in recent days in which the 2020 Democratic presidential hopeful falsely
said he led New York City through 9/11. "I led a complex, diverse city through 9/11, and I have common sense plans to
move America away from chaos to progress," Bloomberg said in a 30-second campaign ad called "It Won't Work." The
problem with the claim is that Bloomberg did not take over as mayor of the Big Apple until Jan. 1, 2002, several months
after terrorists flew airplanes into the World Trade Center towers in Manhattan. Rudolph Giuliani served as mayor when
the attacks occurred.
CNN
panel manages to blame Trump for media infatuation with Avenatti. Now that creepy porn lawyer Michael Avenatti
has been convicted of trying to extort Nike, those who gave him a national platform in the hopes he could somehow bring down
President Donald Trump are engaged in a little revisionist history. It was because networks like CNN and MSNBC are so
obsessed with destroying the president that Avenatti became such a darling for the left in the first place, but leave it to
CNN to now try to spin that reality and come out of this mess blaming Trump.
CNN's
Don Lemon Claims Democrats Are [a] 'Centrist Party'. In spite of all the solidly liberal positions that
Democratic politicians adopt in order to win their party's nomination for various offices, CNN host Don Lemon on Monday
claimed that the party is actually a "centrist party" as he and liberal contributor Joe Lockhart discussed the popularity of
the far-left Bernie Sanders. At one point, Lemon bragged, "I've been giving people the facts about the Democratic party
that it's actually a centrist party, right?"
The Editor says...
The current Democratic Party candidates are in a race to the political left, actively competing to see who can be the most extreme.
The Abortion Party is as extreme as it can be in its relentless promotion of infanticide.
The Democrats have created a welfare system that punishes fatherhood and encourages perpetual dependence on Big Government.
The Democrats are soft on crime, cozy with the theocratic Muslims, and proud of opening doors for transvestites.
The Democrats have made it abundantly clear that they don't want you to have firearms.
(No communist dictator anywhere in the world would want you to have firearms.)
If you are forced to bake a wedding cake for a same-sex marriage, it's because of the Democrats.
If you go into a public restroom and find a transvestite in there, it's because of the Democrats.
If you go to a restaurant and they won't give you a plastic straw, it's because of the Democrats.
If you drive downtown and see homeless bums defecating in the streets, it's because of the Democrats.
If you have kids in high school who can't add two numbers without a calculator, it's because of the Democrats.
If one of your school kids comes home and tries to tell you there are 63 genders, it's because of the Democrats.
If you go to a movie theater and you are bombarded with nudity, blasphemy, and profanity, it's because of the Democrats.
If some teenager gets snooty with you because you didn't use his or her "preferred pronouns," it's because of the Democrats.
If you go to the polls and leave there unsure if you vote will be counted, it's because of the Democrats.
If you're afraid to tell a stranger that you voted for President Trump, it's because of the Democrats.
If you hear the TV news people screaming about a "climate emergency," when you know there's nothing abnormal about the weather, it's because of the Democrats.
The Democratic Party platform is replete with socialism, thanks to people like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and if
Bernie Sanders is the party's presidential nominee, there will be large chunks of outright communism mixed in as well.
There is nothing conservative or moderate or centrist about the Socialist Democratic Party.
CNN's
Cascading Credibility Crisis. CNN is currently suffering a credibility crisis unlike anything they've
experienced before. Last year, Business Insider reported that only 53% of American adults believe CNN is
"credible," and among Republicans in particular, CNN's credibility has fallen "by nearly 20 percentage points since 2016."
[...] There are, of course, scores of contributing factors and explanations that various people may have for mistrusting CNN.
But my primary reason for no longer trusting the network comes down to the way network executives react whenever their
journalists are caught behaving badly. CNN host Don Lemon and two panelists openly mocking purportedly stupid Trump
supporters last week provides one such example. Putting aside the blatant lack of journalistic objectivity and
unprofessionalism displayed throughout the segment, the question of credibility still arises in its aftermath. Instead
of apologizing or taking responsibility for his actions, Lemon tried to misrepresent what actually transpired.
CNN
Busted For Fake News Against Trump, With Their Own Words. CNN in a "fact check" posted this tweet on Thursday,
declaring that President Donald Trump "falsely claims former FBI Director James Comey admitted to leaking." We have to
"fact check" the alleged fact checkers. Of course, this tweet itself is false, as Comey himself testified before Congress
and admitted that he leaked through a friend to the New York Times to get a Special Counsel appointed to go after Trump.
CNN
Chyron: "Trump Vindictive at Impeachment Acquittal 'Celebration'". CNN ran the chyron "Trump Vindictive
at Impeachment Acquittal 'Celebration'" during a White House event to mark his victory this week in the impeachment
fight — and years of investigation before that. The event, where Trump spoke extemporaneously for over an
hour, featured several jabs at those who attempted to take down his administration — but also many jokes, and warm
plaudits for his supporters.
America's
Opinion Journalists Ranked: The Good, The Bad, and The Worst. [Scroll down] Don Lemon (CNN). At a
network that features not a single distinguished reporter or commentator, but lots of propagandists, Don Lemon fits right in.
Though he sports perhaps the thinnest journalistic credentials of any network anchor, Lemon knows exactly how to push the levers,
in an age of political correctness, available for self-aggrandizement. So it is that he has called Trump a racist, even as
he has declared, without evincing a hint of irony, that "the biggest terror threat in this country is white men." [...] Chris
Cuomo (CNN). [...] Cuomo is the opposite of suave; he's an oaf, and not a very smart one at that. Among the tells:
He has astonishingly averred that hate speech isn't protected by the First Amendment; and exploded in profane and bully-boy rage
when a guy referred to him as Fredo.
Ted
Cruz schools Cuomo: CNN supposed to want to discover the truth, not help Dems cover it up. Sen. Ted
Cruz, R-Texas, has been consistent throughout the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump, wanting to shine a
light on the nefarious actions of former Vice President Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden, in regard to Ukraine. To that
end, Cruz slammed CNN for trying to cover up the younger Biden's role — the liberal media has been unified in
saying there has been "no evidence" of wrongdoing.
The Death
of Cable News in One Clip. [Scroll down] CNN, from which "news" channel the clip comes, is perhaps the
worst offender of all, having deliberately contrived and cultivated a stable of guests whose defining characteristic is not
analytical skill or eloquence or reflexive independence of thought, but rather Possession of a Strong Opinion about Donald
Trump. On CNN, Trump is the North Star. He is the point around which all must be graphed; the question to which
all others must be subordinated; the one piece of data that predicts and explains everything else. Bit by bit, the
channel has become Fox News with a different predilection. It is Us v. Them, without break. And, as on Fox,
the "us" and the "them" on CNN are alarmingly narrow in scope. 63 million Americans voted for Donald Trump. Are they
all slack-jawed yokels motivated by hostility to geography, and facts? Do they all — or even
most — have strong Southern accents? And, irrespective, is a Southern accent a predictor of stupidity?
Don Lemon addresses CNN panel
mocking Trump voters. CNN anchor Don Lemon appeared to be on the defensive on Tuesday night [1/28/2020] after a panel
discussion mocking Trump supporters went viral. [...] "During an interview on Saturday night, one of my guests said something
that made me laugh. And while in the moment, I found that joke humorous. And I didn't catch everything that was
said." The anti-Trump anchor added, "Just to make it perfectly clear, I was laughing at the joke and not at any group of
people." It is unclear what specific joke Lemon was referring to. The first joke was at the expense of President
Trump while the rest of the jokes were at the expense of his supporters.
CNN
Panel Led by Don Lemon Trashes Trump Supporters as Ignorant Rednecks Who Can't Read. CNN hit a new low this
weekend mocking and laughing out loud at uneducated, redneck Trump supporters who can't even read. This is what they
think of Middle America — the 63 million Americans who voted for Donald Trump for president. Far-left op-ed
writer Wajahat Ali, and Never-Trumper Rick Wilson joined Don Lemon in the vicious assault on Trump supporters. It could
not have been more insulting.
CNN Lies About
"Permitless Carry" In Kansas City Shooting. While I no longer expect the mainstream media to not be biased in
their reporting, I do expect them to be factual. They can be plenty biased in their reporting without mangling the
actual facts available, after all. However, CNN — an outfit that still likes to bill themselves as both
trusted and trustworthy — has a habit of not necessarily doing that. They routinely get labeled "fake news"
by people like President Trump and it infuriates them. The thing is, though, if they don't want to be labeled fake
news, they probably should stop doing stupid stuff like this.
CNN
Blames Bar Shooting on Lax Gun Laws. It Got The Facts Wrong. A CNN article on a recent Kansas City bar
shooting mischaracterized the shooter's criminal history to blame the killing on Missouri's gun laws. Police identified
29-year-old Jahron Swift as the shooter who killed one woman and injured 15 before he was killed by an armed guard January 19.
CNN published a report Wednesday saying Swift likely would have gone to prison over a weapons charge if not for the state's 2017
permitless carry law. However, the report obfuscated the date of Swift's charge to suggest the law let him off the hook for
it. All of Swift's prior arrests and weapons charges came before Missouri's gun law went into effect. Even after it was
enacted on Jan. 1, 2017, the permitless carry law would not have nullified Swift's pending unlawful use of weapons charges.
But regardless of the permitless carry law, Swift was convicted of two felonies and therefore could not have legally carried a gun.
CNN
Analyst Fabricates Quotes From GOP Senators to Smear Trump, Fox News. On Wednesday afternoon [1/22/2020], a CNN
analyst cooked up a "conversation" between two Republican senators in order to smear President Donald Trump, his party, and
Fox News. He later admitted to having completely fabricated the quotes, but only after The Washington Post's
self-described conservative Jennifer Rubin retweeted his "report."
CNN
Hack Tweets Out "Overheard Convo" Between GOP Senators Panicking About Impeachment — Later Admits He Made it All
Up. CNN political analyst and former Comms for the Clinton White House, Joe Lockhart tweeted out an "overheard
convo" between Republican Senators who were supposedly panicking because of what Schiff said during his impeachment tirade.
[...] After his tweet went viral with thousands of retweets and 10's of thousands of 'likes' with 'conservative' WaPo blogger
Jennifer Rubin retweeting it, Lockhart admitted he made up the entire conversation. "Ok maybe I made up the convo, but
you know that's exactly what they're thinking." Lockhart tweeted.
CNN
Makes Most Perfect CNN Hire In History. Tuesday was now former editor-at-large for CNBC John Harwood's first
day at CNN as a network White House correspondent. Less than a week after CNN complained that one of its reporters was
called a "liberal hack," CNN hired a liberal hack. Harwood is a textbook example of a biased reporter masquerading
around the nation's capital as an "objective journalist," on a noble quest to uncover the truth in clear and honest reporting
in a media environment saturated with fake news. There is certainly no shortage of examples to illustrate Harwood's
left-wing bias, but then again, the list to showcase CNN's runs even longer, making the pair a perfect fit.
Progressive Petards.
Since at least 2016, CNN has mostly ceased being a news agency, but that hasn't stopped it from being an active participant
in #TheResistance. The network is so caught up in the fervor of this movement that many of its guests and regular hosts
have been fired, reprimanded, or apologized for threats to the president or general obscene references (e.g., Reza Aslan, the
late Anthony Bourdain, Kathy Griffin). Many of its marquee reporters have resigned, were fired, or reassigned for
fake-news bias (e.g., Thomas Frank, Eric Lichtblau, and Lex Haris), or came under fire for false reporting (Jim Sciutto,
Marshall Cohen, and Carl Bernstein) or have had to offer retractions and/or apologies (Gloria Borger, Eric Lichtblau, Jake
Tapper, and Brian Rokus.) Its anchors have apologized for obscenity (Anderson Cooper) or simply making up false
statements (Chris Cuomo), while analysts have been caught in a number of contradictions about their own role in on-going
scandals (James Clapper). The common denominator has been the new journalistic ethos that aborting the Trump presidency
justifies any means necessary to achieve such noble ends.
If
CNN Can't Take Punches, They Shouldn't Be Throwing Them. As a guy who grew up in Philly I'd like to inform CNN
that you don't get to come to the playground, smack everyone around and then run to the teacher when they hit you back.
So here are a few jabs for you purveyors of pure, unbiased truth. Lets run down the list of people you told viewers are
likely to take down Trump over the past few years. James Comey, Robert Mueller, Michael Cohen, Michael Flynn, Michael
Avenatti, the whistleblower, the SDNY, Andrew McCabe, Stormy Daniels, and now John Bolton and Lev Parnas. The
mathematical probability of being that wrong, that often while acting in good faith falls somewhere between zero and
zero. Do they hate their viewers? Its like they are in an abusive relationship with them where they prey on their
emotions, contently promising a better, Trump-free tomorrow, constantly disappointing that expectation.
Trump
Administration Ushered in an Age of Truth Over Decorum. One refreshing result of the age of Trump is the sudden
emphasis of truth over propriety that even lawmakers have now adopted. Although CNN is having a hard time dealing with
it, the network may want to simply sit this one out and accept reality. [...] When CNN was launched in 1980, its slogan was,
"The most trusted name in news" — and it was. It's latest slogan is, "Go there" — and it does,
whether it should or not. As for Trump, liberal pundits and Democratic politicians often accuse members of the
administration, and especially the president, of repeatedly lying. What the administration has actually done is to
usher in an age of truth over decorum. It just takes a while getting used to it.
CNN's bias is now beyond
laughable. As Sen. Martha McSally (R-Ariz.) walked through the hallways of the Senate Thursday, CNN senior
congressional correspondent Manu Raju asked her if the Senate should consider "new evidence as part of the impeachment
trial." McSally shot back: "Manu, you're a liberal hack. I'm not talking to you." "You're not going to
comment about this?" a dazed Raju asked. "You're a liberal hack, buddy," McSally replied as she walked away.
Predictably, conservatives cheered, while mainstream media decried McSally's move as unbecoming. Whatever your take,
the interaction reflects three years of mounting frustration with an overtly partisan media, exemplified by CNN, which has
dropped any pretense of fairness and become an organ of the Democratic Party. The problem isn't that Raju asked the
question — that's his job, after all. It's that virtually all questions posed by political reporters these
days are framed to support the narratives and assumptions of one political party, the Democrats.
CNN
Is The Home of Liberal Hacks. U.S. Senator Martha McSally (R-AZ) created a firestorm of controversy this week
when she called CNN reporter Manu Raju "a liberal hack." [...] Raju and his CNN colleagues are all "liberal hacks." Other
than an occasional token conservative analyst or guest, the entire CNN roster of producers and on-air talent, including all
the network's hosts, is composed of steadfast liberals, progressives and socialists. In fact, one of their major
personalities is Van Jones, a self-proclaimed communist. Other Republican officeholders should follow McSally's lead
and refuse to appear on CNN. As tweeted by U.S. Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX), CNN media personalities are not real "journalists."
He noted that they "relentlessly attack every Republican" and "always, always push the prevailing Dem narrative of the moment."
Sanders Supporters
Shocked to Find Bias at CNN. [Scroll down] Conservatives have been making the same point for decades,
only to be sneered at by progressives who insisted that such claims were conspiracy theories. In reality, it has long
been obvious that CNN operates more like the PR department for the Democratic National Committee (DNC) than a legitimate news
outlet. The last time Sanders ran for president, CNN commentator Donna Brazile gave Hillary Clinton advance copies of
debate questions during the Democratic primary. It was CNN's Candy Crowley who jumped in to back up erstwhile President
Barack Obama on a brazen lie about Benghazi during a debate with Mitt Romney. If it isn't obvious, the DNC is terrified
of Sanders. They know he doesn't have a prayer of beating Trump and that the latter would like nothing better than to
run against an unrepentant socialist. The problem is that Sanders is doing better than expected in the polls,
particularly in Iowa and New Hampshire.
Nasty
CNN Warns VA Gun Rights Supporters Could Cause Violence Like Charlottesville. Wednesday afternoon's [1/15/2020]
CNN Newsroom ended with host Brooke Baldwin and correspondent Jason Carroll serving as chief fear mongers on behalf of
"Governor Blackface" Ralph Northam (D-VA), parroting fears that Monday's Lobby Day in support of the Second Amendment could
bring violence a la Charlottesville. Baldwin also repeatedly fixated on the event and the possibility of violence
falling on Martin Luther King Jr. Day, so there was that angle that one could assume was a hint at a charge of racism.
CNN
fighting with Babylon Bee over who has the fakest news. It all started with an article the Bee, a
self-described "Trusted Source For Christian News Satire" site, published that poked fun at the Democrats' reaction to
President Trump ordering the strike on Iranian terror master Qassem Soleimani. The satiric piece entitled Democrats
Call For Flags To Be Flown At Half-Mast To Grieve Death Of Soleimani is hilarious, and like all good satire, it works
because it's an exaggeration of something that is actually happening. CNN's Donie O'Sullivan read a tweet about how
popular the piece is and immediately took issue with the Bee. It seems, much to his and CNN's chagrin that the
Bee's article received more social media engagement than top stories at the New York Times and CNN had over the
course of a full week.
Come clean, CNN.
"We stand by our reporting." That phrase is a go-to in media industry public relations, unleashed when events appear to
debunk an outlet's precious scoop. It's right up there with "We don't comment on personnel matters" and "We don't
comment on editorial deliberations." And there "We stand by our reporting" was in a CNN statement to the Erik Wemple
Blog, which had asked the network about its anchors' repeated claims that the dossier compiled by former British intelligence
official Christopher Steele had been corroborated to a significant degree. "Your intel community has corroborated all
the details," CNN host Alisyn Camerota told Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) in December 2017. Other CNNers stated that "parts"
or "much" of the dossier — which claimed an "extensive conspiracy" between the Trump campaign and Russia prior to
the 2016 presidential election — had been corroborated.
Debunking
CNN's false climate scare reporting. A CNN article, "Shouting into the apocalypse: The Decade in climate
change," recently reached the top of Google News searches for "climate change." The article falsely asserted climate
change is to blame for recent extreme weather events, even though extreme weather events began occurring long before the
invention of coal-fired power plants and SUVs. The silver lining is the CNN article provides the opportunity for a
concise rebuttal for the most common alarmist climate misinformation.
CNN
Concocts Dire Warning from Joint Chiefs to Congress to Fit Their Narrative on Soleimani. A CNN article with a
very compelling headline, syndicated to dozens of websites, rocketed across social media on Saturday, triggering a viral
alert and making the CNN home page. And it conveniently reinforced CNN's days-long narrative that in killing Qasem
Soleimani, President Donald Trump has not only escalated the tenuous situation in Iraq, but dramatically increased the
specific and imminent risk to Americans from Iran, to the dismay and even disgruntlement of top officials, and even the
chairman of the Joint Chiefs. The article purports to report a dire warning from the Trump administration (at large)
to congress (et al) that Iran is "expected" to attack American targets any day. In keeping with the narrative.
Yes, but he's a perfect fit at CNN. Documents
Prove CNN Hired a Shameless Liar in Andrew McCabe. Documents have emerged that prove far-left CNN hired a
shameless liar in Andrew McCabe, the former deputy director of the FBI. In August, CNN — an anti-Trump
outlet that traffics in conspiracy theories, fake news, and promoting violence against Trump supporters — hired
the disgraced former deputy director as a contributor and analyst. At the time, McCabe was already out at the FBI after
then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions fired him for "an unauthorized disclosure to the news media and lack[ing]
candor — including under oath — on multiple occasions."
Soledad O'Brien
slams Brian Stelter, CNN for booking guests who 'intentionally lie' on air. Anchor-turned-media exec Soledad
O'Brien blasted CNN and its chief media correspondent, Brian Stelter, for the network's practice of booking guests who
"intentionally" lie on air. The spat began when Stelter shared a piece about the significance of disinformation that
has plagued social media. [...] This isn't the first time O'Brien went after Stelter. Last month, she ripped the CNN
icon for his response when asked how networks can get Americans interested in the impeachment hearings.
CNN Is
Not a News Network. [Scroll down] These days, CNN is a peculiar and unlovely hybrid of progressive
propaganda outlet, oleaginous media apologist, sexless cultural scold, and frenzied Donald Trump stalkerblog. When news
breaks, it is no longer useful or appropriate to tell someone, "Turn on CNN," because if he did, he would be as likely to be
presented with a wall of advocacy and obsession as with the headlines of the hour. Today, CNN does not broadcast the
news; it broadcasts what it wants you to think the news is. At long last, it has become Fox.
Is
CNN beginning to reform itself? [Scroll down] Keep in mind that CNN has meticulously kept its viewers
ignorant of most things that would cast an unfavorable light on the efforts to impeach (or even say something positive about)
President Trump. The network did not carry IG Horowitz's testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee, for instance. [...]
Is CNN management finally starting to realize that they are committing slow motion suicide with their biased news coverage?
Flashback: CNN's
Jim Sciutto Defended Steele Dossier More Than Anybody. Perhaps more than any other journalist, CNN's Jim
Sciutto has championed the Steele dossier, asserting in news articles and on-air segments that the FBI had verified central
parts of the salacious document, and that the bureau would have corroborated the information before using it in applications
for surveillance warrants against former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page. Sciutto reported Feb. 10, 2017, that U.S.
officials had "corroborated some" parts of the dossier. He insisted Dec. 26, 2017, in a broadcast that the FBI would
have corroborated information in the report before using it to spy on Page.
All impeachment all the time. Where does that get you? Bottom
Falls Out as CNN Ratings Hit 3-Year Low. Far-left CNN, an anti-Trump, pro-violence, racist, fake news outlet
that traffics in conspiracy theories, collapsed to a three-year low in the ratings during the week of November 25.
Devin
Nunes Sues CNN: Reveals He Was Not in Vienna in Late 2018, Did Not Meet Victor Shokin. Nunes's lawsuit includes
revelations of key facts that undermine the case CNN made against him, severely harming the news outlet's credibility.
The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Virginia, shows Nunes is seeking more than $435 million in damages from CNN over the
fake news it printed against him. But more importantly, it demonstrates that Nunes was 100 percent correct when he told
Breitbart News before Thanksgiving that CNN's story was untrue — and that CNN was completely inaccurate in its
reporting and had relied on a compromised source for its piece.
Nunes
sues CNN over 'demonstrably false' Ukraine report. Rep. Devin Nunes, the ranking Republican on the House
Intelligence Committee, has filed a $435 million defamation suit against CNN over a story that alleged Nunes met with a fired
Ukrainian prosecutor in an effort to dig up dirt on Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden. The story —
"Giuliani associate willing to tell Congress Nunes met with ex-Ukrainian official to get dirt on Biden" — was published
Nov. 22. It was based on the words of Joseph Bondy, the attorney for Ukrainian-born Lev Parnas, who worked closely with
Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani in pursuing allegations of Ukrainian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential election as well as
allegations of corruption in Ukraine involving Biden's son Hunter. Parnas is currently under indictment on campaign finance
charges.
CNN Hopes Americans
Fret Over Climate 'Catastrophe' This Thanksgiving. CNN Newsroom co-host Jim Sciutto and "climate
correspondent" Bill Weir spent time Wednesday [11/27/2019] warning it may be "too late" to stop the upcoming environmental
global catastrophe. While most Americans are going to be enjoying their families and remembering what they are thankful
for this holiday, the CNN duo claimed families would be sitting around worrying about how the world is going to become
uninhabitable in the next decade. Sciutto opened the segment hyping a new United Nations report that warned humanity
was running out of time to stop the impending catastrophe. "Folks, this is important. A new United Nations report
warns that countries are running out of time to limit — just limit, the climate crisis and it could soon be too
late to prevent temperatures around the world from rising to near catastrophic levels. This is real!" Sciutto fretted,
really laying on the dramatics.
The Editor says...
There is no climate crisis. There is no extraordinary world-wide temperature increase: Certainly nothing you'd ever
notice, and definitely nothing that can or should be fixed by shutting down all industrial activity.
CNN's
pre-Thanksgiving civility lesson: Trump defenders 'Should Be Laughed at, Ridiculed, and Scorned'. When
you consider the vast number of people forced to watch CNN as they waited at their gates for delayed airline flights on the
busiest travel day of the year, one marked by weather delays in most of the country, this call for harsh derision could
affect a lot of Thanksgiving dinners today. Ridicule and scorn do not fit well with the theme of giving thanks for the
blessings we receive as Americans, but then again, CNN, in the ratings tank and discredited for its repeated fake news
incidents, has less to be thankful for than most Americans, enjoying higher incomes and lower taxes.
Devin
Nunes To Take Swift Legal Action Against CNN For 'Demonstrably False' Story. House Intelligence Committee Ranking
Member Devin Nunes (R-CA) announced Friday night [11/22/2019] that he is filing a lawsuit against CNN over a report that they
published the same evening that alleged an indicted associate of Rudy Giuliani was willing to testify to Congress that Nunes
met with a former Ukrainian prosecutor last year to discuss digging up dirt on former Vice President and current Democrat
presidential candidate Joe Biden.
Nunes:
CNN, The Daily Beast 'Are Going to Run for Cover'. Monday [11//25/2019] on Fox News Channel's "Hannity," Rep. Devin
Nunes (R-CA), the ranking Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, vowed to challenge CNN and The Daily Beast in federal court
for reportage that tied him to a meeting with the Ukrainians. Nunes told host Sean Hannity that he predicted those two outlets
would "run for cover." However, he pledged to continue his quest until those outlets were held to account.
After
Impeachment TV Bombs, Media Vomits Hot Propaganda All Weekend. I try not to watch the news on the weekend or
look at/engage on social media but it was hard to avoid their efforts because the damage control was so obvious. [...] "These
demonstrably false and scandalous stories published by the Daily Beast and CNN are the perfect example of defamation and
reckless disregard for the truth," Nunes told Breitbart News late Friday night. "Some political operative offered these
fake stories to at least five different media outlets before finding someone irresponsible enough to publish them. I
look forward to prosecuting these cases, including the media outlets, as well as the sources of their fake stories, to the
fullest extent of the law. I intend to hold the Daily Beast and CNN accountable for their actions. They will find
themselves in court soon after Thanksgiving."
Nunes
to sue CNN, Daily Beast over 'demonstrably false' stories he sought dirt on Biden. Rep. Devin Nunes said
on Saturday [11/23/2019] he plans to sue CNN and the Daily Beast for stories that accused him of meeting with a former
Ukraine prosecutor in a hunt for dirt on former Vice President Joe Biden. Mr. Nunes called "demonstrably false" an
assertion from CNN's source, an attorney for Soviet-born Lev Parnas, that the California Republican met with former chief
Ukraine prosecutor Viktor Shokin in Vienna in 2018. Mr. Parnas is living under house arrest at his Florida home
after federal prosecutors charged him in New York with illegally funneling foreign money into U.S. political campaigns.
CNN
downplays its own FISA bombshell report, receives minimal on-air coverage. Despite having a major bombshell
website report on DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz's ongoing probe into the origins of the Russia investigation, CNN
offered very little coverage of its own exclusive reporting on-air. CNN first reported that Horowitz had been
investigating an FBI official who allegedly altered a document used to obtain a FISA warrant in order to surveil Trump
campaign adviser Carter Page during the 2016 election. Horowitz reportedly turned the evidence over to U.S. Attorney
John Durham, who has launched a criminal probe in the origins of the Russia investigation. The Washington Post also
verified the reporting. However, CNN barely promoted its own digital scoop on the network.
CNN's
Don Lemon Calls Trump supporters 'mental'. On Tuesday, November 19th, CNN anchor Don Lemon made a mind-boggling
statement. He said, of the ongoing impeachment hearings, "I think on this one, the Republicans are on the wrong side of
history, and they are the most hypocritical. I'm not a partisan. I know people think that I'm some liberal
Democrat. I'm not." He went on to say, "I don't think the Republicans are serving themselves well." Talk about
hypocrisy! If Lemon isn't "partisan," neither were Hitler or Stalin. Lemon is to hypocrisy as Macy's is to
Thanksgiving Day parades.
CNN's
Don Lemon claims he's not 'some liberal' Democrat: 'I'm not a partisan'. CNN host Don Lemon declared he's not
"some liberal Democrat" and claimed he isn't partisan on Tuesday when discussing the ongoing impeachment hearings. "I
think on this one, the Republicans are on the wrong side of history, and they are the most hypocritical. I'm not a
partisan. I know people think that I'm some liberal Democrat. I'm not. They used to think I was a
conservative Republican. I'm not," Lemon said during his nightly handoff with fellow CNN host Chris Cuomo. "But I
don't think the Republicans are serving themselves well." Lemon has been an outspoken critic of President Trump and
members of his administration. But CNN has long touted its ratings-challenged primetime lineup of "Anderson Cooper
360," "Cuomo Prime Time" and Lemon's "CNN Tonight" as straight-news shows despite a heavy dose of liberal opinion. The
network's website labels Lemon as an "anchor."
The Military-Intelligence
Complex. We know from a variety of disinterested watchdog institutions and foundations that the media has
offered 90 percent negative coverage of the Trump Administration. CNN in its anti-Trump zeal has ruined its brand by
serial fabrications and firings of its marquee biased reporters. An entire array of CNN journalists and analysts either
has resigned, been fired, retired, forced to offer retractions, or been disgraced either for peddling ad hominem crude
attacks on Trump, displaying unprofessional behavior, concocting or repeating false stories, engaging in obscene commentary,
or being refuted, including but not limited at times to Reza Aslan, Carl Bernstein, Donna Brazile, James Clapper, Marshall
Cohen, Candy Crowley, Kathy Griffin, Julie Joffe, Michael Hayden, Suzanne Malveaux, Manu Raju, Jim Sciutto, Julian Zelizer,
and teams such as Thomas Frank, Eric Lichtblau, and Lex Harris, and Gloria Borger, Jake Tapper, and Brian Rokus.
Three
Cheers for Refugee Reduction. Over the weekend, President Donald Trump approved a new annual refugee cap of
18,000, the lowest since the U.S. program began in 1980. The reduction follows news that America took a pause last month and
refused to admit any new refugees. On economic, public safety and national security grounds, this is a very good thing
for the 325 million people already in our country. But you wouldn't know it from the grim headlines and hysterical
condemnations by globalist zealots and media sympathizers. CNN International led the open borders funeral procession last
week, with a report decrying, "No refugees will be resettled in the US in October, leaving hundreds in limbo around the world."
CNN's
Brian Stelter Does Incredible Investigative Work On Just How Bad the Orange Man Is. At some point, you have to
wonder whether Brian Stelter is coming up with this stuff on his own or if it's really Jeff Zucker whispering in his ear
while woofing down Cheetos? Either way, we've reached a level of ridiculousness that probably should be checked on by
the middle management at CNN. Stelter's ironically named "Reliable Sources" went out yesterday [11/3/2019] and decided to
just jump every shark that was left to jump in the pursuit of orange man bad coverage. It's gotten to the point of
appearing to be parody.
WalkAway
Founder Brandon Straka Confronts CNN's April Ryan: 'You're The Biggest Liar in This Room'. In what can only be
described as an epic moment at Politicon, a political convention with panelists from the left and the right, Brandon Straka
of the WalkAway campaign confronted CNN's April Ryan, who was speaking on a panel called "Being Black Under Trump," and
called her out for misleading people about the president with fake news.
CNN Fails To Disclose
Key Facts About Andrew McCabe In Interview About DOJ Criminal Investigation. CNN interviewed Andrew McCabe on
Friday about developments in a Justice Department criminal investigation of the origins of the Trump-Russia probe, but the
network failed to disclose that the former FBI deputy director is suing the Justice Department and is under criminal
investigation himself.
'I
used it purposefully': CNN commentator maintains GOP sit-in like 'a Klan group'. CNN commentator Keith Boykin
compared the GOP lawmakers who disrupted the impeachment proceedings to "a Klan group" and then stood by the claim after
facing pushback. Republican lawmakers not on the committees involved in the testimony of Deputy Assistant Secretary of
Defense Laura Cooper demanded entry into the hearing but were denied Thursday [sic - Wednesday].
Sounds like baseless defamation to me. CNN
Analyst: 'No Question That Tulsi Gabbard ... is a Puppet of the Russian Government'. On the very day Democratic presidential contender
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) said that The New York Times and CNN were smearing veterans like herself because she opposes the "regime
change" war in Syria, CNN analyst Bakari Sellers told a panel of CNN reporters "there is no question that Tulsi Gabbard ... is a puppet for the
Russian government." On CNN New Day, Oct. 15 — the day of the Democratic presidential debate hosted by CNN and
The New York Times — CNN contributor Bakari Sellers said, "I firmly believe that Tulsi Gabbard stands on that stage and is the
antithesis to what the other 11 individuals stand for, especially when it comes to issues such as foreign policy."
CNN's
Jeff Zucker: A Ventriloquist for Dummies. Given this week's revelations from Project Veritas, it has
become obvious that the one-time-journalist Jake Tapper, apparently left his brain, pride, and any testicular fortitude
behind when he left ABC for more money and facetime at CNN. He has metamorphosed into the new Jerry Mahoney, the
ventriloquist's dummy of CNN.
Trump
Campaign to Sue CNN over Pro-Impeachment Bias. In the wake of recent footage released by Project Veritas
showing significant anti-Trump/pro-impeachment bias at CNN, President Trump's campaign is vowing to sue the network for "a
substantial payment of damages," according to an exclusive report from Paul Bedard at the Washington Examiner. [...] f
course, the media is protected by the First Amendment. However, Trump's attorney, who represents him and his campaign,
said in a letter to CNN that the network's bias violates the Lanham Act "by constituting misrepresentations to the public, to
your advertisers, and to others" to distribute "truly fair and balanced" news.
Trump
campaign to sue CNN over pro-impeachment bias, demands 'substantial payment'. Outraged by secretly taped
anti-Trump comments attributed to CNN President Jeff Zucker and others at the cable network, President Trump's campaign is
vowing to sue the company for "a substantial payment of damages." In a four-page letter to CNN, Zucker, and Executive
Vice President David Vigilante, Trump attorney Charles J. Harder cited years of anti-Trump bias at the network and
claimed the cable giant has broken its promise of "excellence in journalism."
CNN
Falsely Claims White House 'Admits to Quid Pro Quo' with Ukraine. CNN claimed Thursday [10/17/2019] that the
White House "admits to quid pro quo with Ukraine." That appeared to be the opposite, in fact, of what happened during a
press conference with acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney. Mulvaney told reporters that there had been no
quid pro quo, as described by those pursuing his impeachment — that President Donald Trump had not withheld aid from
Ukraine until it agreed to investigate his potential 2020 presidential rival, former Vice President Joe Biden.
CNN Slammed
by CNN Staffers: Jeff Zucker as Captain Ahab. In a stunning story that James O'Keefe's Project
Veritas is now releasing this week, a series of CNN president Jeff Zucker's morning staff meetings were secretly
recorded — by a CNN staffer (who, for sure, has quickly been fired.) The findings, as here, were released
just as CNN prepared to co-host Tuesday's Democratic presidential debate with the New York Times. [...] After all
these months and months of pushing the Trump-Russia conspiracy theory that has now crashed and burned, not to mention the
Stormy Daniels business, Democrats are now all about Ukraine. And Jeff Zucker is exactly right — everything
that has been done since the president took office is designed with one goal in mind: impeachment.
CNN
Exposed as a Pure, 100 Percent Democrat Information Operation. [Numerous video clips] In short, CNN is
not — I repeat, is not — a news network. It doesn't practice journalism. It doesn't reporting
objective facts. It's a corrupt, diabolical information warfare campaign aimed at destroying the American republic.
CNN
didn't disclose that [a] maxed-out Warren donor asked [the] question that spurred [a] viral answer.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren's answer to a question at last week's LGBTQ Town Hall meeting went viral, when she suggested that
opposition to gay marriage was the result of incel frustration. But the questioner appears to be a maxed-out donor to
Ms. Warren's campaign — a fact CNN did not disclose. According to a report Monday in the Washington
Free Beacon, questioner Morgan Cox was identified as "Chair, Human Rights Campaign Board of Directors" on the CNN
chyron. "It could have just as easily identified Cox as 'Donor, Elizabeth Warren,'" the Free Beacon wrote.
Veritas:
CNN whistleblower impeaches fake news network's tattered credibility. Ask Project Veritas. They'll tell
you that Cary Poarch is a whistleblower of a different sort. First, he's not a secret minion of the CIA, spreading
disinformation to help moribund Democrats oust the duly-elected president of the United States. Second, his information
is firsthand and recorded for posterity by a hidden camera under his control. In fact, Poarch works as a satellite
uplink technician for the Washington, D.C. bureau of fake news CNN.
CNN
Tries to Get Interior Department Official Fired for Opposing Jihad Violence. So it turns out that the acting
director of the Interior Department's Bureau of Land Management, William Perry Pendley, has denied the Left's "climate
change" mythology, and opposes jihad violence and illegal immigration. CNN's Andrew Kaczynski is out for blood, trying
to get Pendley for heresy, that is, for his dissent from Leftist orthodoxy. My first reaction to this was, so
what? William Perry Pendley is in the Bureau of Land Management. What does that have to do with "global warming,"
unless Kaczynski thinks that the sea levels are going to rise and swallow whole cities, including Obama's new beachfront
estate, and we're all going to be dead in 12 years? What do jihad violence and illegal immigration have to do
with land management? Kaczynski here shows that he would have been a terrific Gestapo official: [...]
CNN
Just [Omitted] 540 Words to Frame Trump for [a] 'Favor' He Never Requested. In the media's efforts to tie
President Donald Trump with its latest conspiracy theory, CNN skipped an entire section of the released and unredacted
transcript of a phone call to charge Trump with requesting a favor he never asked for.
CNN:
Everything but the News. For a while, we thought MSNBC had temporarily usurped CNN as the font of fake
news — although both networks had tied for the most negative coverage (93 percent of all their news reports) of
President Trump's first 100 days in office. A cynic would argue that CNN had deliberately given Trump undue coverage
during the Republican primary on the theory that he would be the weakest Republican in the general election and would therefore
be the weakest challenger to Hillary Clinton. CNN president Jeffrey Zucker at one point had bragged that in the primaries,
Trump made CNN money. Only later, after Trump's nomination, did Zucker regret giving so much airtime to Trump and his
boisterous rallies. [...] So CNN's Zucker gave copious coverage to Apprentice-star Trump both to win ratings and to
ensure the nomination of a candidate who was polling anemically against Hillary Clinton — with the intention of
then reversing course and destroying Trump in the general election.
The media
has officially lost its mind. [Scroll down] Just a few days earlier, CNN issued a report on the
circumstances around an American spy being taken out of Russia that was so wrong, the Times felt moved to contradict
it: The decision to extract the spy was made while Obama was president, the Times reported, yet CNN blamed Trump for
endangering the agent and forcing his extraction. This isn't just a story of media bias. It's a story of utter
[unbelievable] obliviousness by the media. CNN doesn't bother putting a fig leaf on anything anymore: A glance at
CNN's homepage on any given day is like looking at an assortment of Democratic Party press releases. Any news that
might be happening that can't be weaponized against Trump is of little interest. Any news that might make Trump or
anyone on the right look bad is eagerly pushed through, ordinary standards of fairness and checking [notwithstanding].
6 Reasons
CNN Hired Disgraced Former FBI Official Andrew McCabe. [Reason #2] CNN Loves to Mislead Viewers: CNN is dedicated to
misleading its minuscule audience. The network behind the biggest media hoaxes of the last six years...
• Hispanic George Zimmerman: The White Racist Killer
• Hands Up, Don't Shoot
• Trump Can't Win
• Brett Kavanaugh: Serial Rapist
• The KKKids from KKKovington High School
• Trump Colluded with Russia
...has a reputation to maintain, and who better to keep up appearances than a man fired by the FBI for lying to the FBI? And if
McCabe is willing to accept the legal risks that come with lying to the FBI, imagine all the lies he will be willing to tell on behalf
of CNN when there is no legal risk whatsoever.
CNN
Tries to Blame Trump for the Obama Administration's Leaks. Here's some advice for the media covering President
Trump: If you don't want to be accused of reporting fake news, don't report fake news. Case in point: On
Monday [9/9/2019], CNN correspondent Jim Sciutto reported that a highly-placed U.S. intelligence source inside the Kremlin
was pulled "in part, by concerns that President Donald Trump and his administration repeatedly mishandled classified
intelligence and could contribute to exposing the covert source as a spy." [...] Sorry, the decision to extract the source
was first made before Trump took office, and the reason was mishandling of classified intelligence not by Trump, but by
the Obama administration.
Fake
News, Fake Polls — CNN Edition. Who knew pushing fake news could be so challenging? First,
they tried to turn President Trump into a rube for suggesting that Alabama could be in the path of Hurricane Dorian. It
turns out that CNN suggested the same thing, a few days before Trump did, warning Alabama to "be on the lookout". Then
came the fiction that Trump outed a Russian informant. Instead the reality was that the decision on any outing or
exfiltration occurred before Trump became president. We know whose watch this occurred on, but CNN chose to instead
blame the current president.
On
Anniversary of 9-11, CNN Says 'Right-Wingers Are America's Deadliest Terrorists'. CNN is the enemy of the
American people. On the anniversary of 9-11 attacks where Islamic terrorists hijacked airplanes and flew them into the
Twin Towers, the Pentagon and into a field in Pennsylvania killing nearly 3,000 Americans, CNN is attacking 'right wingers.'
This is disgusting. As CNN was spewing anti-American propaganda, the chyron read, "America's 9/11 Amnesia." "The
striking similarities between the KKK and Islamist jihadis," CNN said.
An even mixture of sensationalism, dishonesty, and incompetence: CNN's
big 'mistakes' all run in one direction: anti-Trump. CNN blared an "exclusive" headline Monday [9/9/2019] with
a story purporting that US intelligence made the decision to "extract" a spy that it had working within the Russian
government because officials believed his cover may have been compromised by President Trump having "repeatedly mishandled
classified intelligence." That dispatch from Jim Sciutto, CNN's "chief national security correspondent," would have
certainly been a smash if it weren't for vehement denials by the administration and subsequent reporting that contradicted
the crux of the story — that it had been Trump who screwed up the intelligence operation. During a White
House press briefing on Tuesday, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo called CNN's reporting "materially inaccurate."
Fake
news CNN introduces a Kremlin "asset". Is it Clinton, Obama or both? Reported as yet another bombshell,
Fake-news CNN claims a Kremlin spy working for America was extracted from Russia because President Trump's mishandling of
classified information threatened to expose the Kremlin infiltrator, endangering his life. [...] There is just one problem
with the story. It contains one glaring lie.
Obama, Not Trump,
Outed Russian Spy. President Trump did not cause the Central Intelligence Agency to withdraw a top-level spy
from Russia. Obama did. And so did indiscreet intelligence officials. CNN's report to the contrary is
false, as usual. CNN has a track record of fake news, including false and biased reporting that elevates white
supremacists. On Monday [9/9/2019], CNN bragged of an "exclusive" report that "the United States successfully extracted
from Russia one of its highest-level covert sources inside the Russian government" partly because "President Donald Trump and
his administration repeatedly mishandled classified intelligence and could contribute to exposing the covert source as a
spy." In fact, however, officials "mishandled intelligence" and tried to extricate this source in 2016, before Trump
even won the presidential election.
What Is The Point of CNN?
[Scroll down] Brian Stelter, who hosts a show called Reliable Sources, recently nodded along as his guest, former Duke
University chair of psychiatry Allen Francis, argued that Trump "may be responsible for many more million deaths" than
genocidal dictators Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, and Mao Zedong. It wasn't the first time Trump has been compared to
Hitler on the network. CNN host Don Lemon did it in July, which could explain why the New York Times has
reportedly banned reporters from appearing on Lemon's show. In addition to interviewing Michael Avenatti dozens of
times on his show, Lemon hosted the disgraced lawyer at a party in the Hamptons.
CNN's
Jake Tapper Gets Really Upset Over It, But His Denials About James Clapper and the Steele Dossier Don't Add Up.
For years now, there's been a primary suspicion that CNN and Jake Tapper (who led the reporting on it) were tipped off about
the Steele Dossier and a briefing to Donald Trump on it by James Clapper, who was still technically part of the Obama
Administration at the time. This all went down in January of 2017, when Tapper suddenly started reporting on details of
the dossier and how the newly elected President had been told about it. The CNN newsman would later express his anger
that Buzzfeed published the dossier, which showed it to be a farce in short order. Though he claims his objections were
based on the unverified nature of the dossier, that doesn't make sense. Why would CNN not want to the entire dossier
published but at the same time be leaking parts of it if they felt it wasn't proper to publish? The more obvious
explanation is that CNN and Tapper really wanted to keep leaking damaging details of the dossier without its ridiculous
nature being exposed.
CNN
falsely pushes claims that [the] 'climate crisis is making hurricanes more dangerous'. CNN's fall from a
purveyor of news to pure propaganda organ of the Left was vividly displayed yesterday. An anchor named Ana Cabrera
accused an expert of "sidestepping" the purported issue of global warming making hurricanes more dangerous. She didn't
interview the guest herself, but rather commented on a previous interview done by her colleague in which the other CNN anchor
tried to bait guest Peter Gaynor, acting FEMA director, into blaming global warming: ["]Researchers say that we're
going to see even more very intense hurricanes due to the climate crisis. Do you agree with that?["] Gaynor
refused to agree.
The Editor says...
Name the "researchers" (plural) who say hurricanes will intensify because of the "climate crisis." Sounds like propaganda
to me. More specifically, it sounds like she's an activist (not a journalist) who is quoting someone who doesn't even exist.
Lawfare
Expects McCabe Arrest — That Explains Why CNN Hired Him. [Scroll down] Knowing the DOJ was
likely to indict McCabe, CNN could help frame a narrative that serves both their interests. That narrative was already
in the New York Times article describing the potential for the indictment. When McCabe is charged the media narrative
will be it's because he took the job with CNN... Trump/Barr weaponizing the DOJ and trying to kill free speech etc. CNN
doesn't have to defend their action in hiring a known liar, they'll instead frame McCabe as a victim, a fellow traveler to
the larger cause of justice — whose indictment is evidence of how far Trump and Barr will go to destroy their
enemies etc.
Warm
CNN and MSNBC newsrooms comfort fallen spies in from the cold. CNN announces it has hired disgraced former
Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe as a "contributor." You may recall that McCabe was fired after the FBI learned he was
leaking to the press and had lied to — you guessed it — FBI investigators hunting down government
leakers. While many a Trump associate cools his heals in the federal poky for "lying to the FBI," lying McCabe is free
to join the ever-growing number of anti-Trump Deep State operatives enriching themselves at the mainstream media's trough.
Political
Forecast: Stormy Weather Ahead. All who can read discard the Russian collusion claims. What remains
of them is the long-delayed Horowitz report and anticipated prosecutions for the coup plotters. For those still wanting
to be deluded there's CNN, which has hired a major plotter, former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, as a contributor to
continue the Let's Pretend narrative.
Our Tawdry,
Untrustworthy Fourth Estate. The ongoing affair between the nation's top law enforcement agency and the news
media resulted in another hookup last week when CNN announced the hiring of Andrew McCabe, the former deputy director of the
FBI. McCabe, a vocal Trump foe who opened a criminal investigation into the sitting president of the United States in
May 2017 during his short stint as acting director, was fired by the FBI last year for lying to federal investigators.
He played a key role in concocting the Trump-Russia collusion hoax; wrote a book filled with animus toward the president; and
remains under a grand jury investigation. Last week, McCabe's lawyers met with federal prosecutors who are deciding
whether to indict him for perjury. So, of course, CNN hired him last week.
Andrew McCabe's Unjust
Deserts. As I have noticed before in this space, Andrew McCabe was a central player in the pseudo-investigation
of Hillary Clinton's misuse of classified information and self-enrichment schemes while secretary of state. He was one
of the people who made sure that the probe went nowhere. McCabe was also a central figure in the get-Mike-Flynn
operation and, later, the Great Trump Hunt that occupied Andrew Weissmann's Howdy Doody dummy Robert Mueller for some two
years. McCabe leaked information about an investigation to a Wall Street Journal reporter and lied about leaking
in casual conversations with superiors as well as under oath. Yet he will soon be reporting for duty at CNN.
CNN
Actually Does Need to Make Brian Stelter Apologize or Discipline Him for This. For a show host who covers
"Reliable Sources," Brian Stelter went a bridge too far on Sunday and CNN either needs to make him apologize or needs to
discipline him. This is too much for a network that prides itself in being fair and objective. First, Stelter
decided it was appropriate and relevant to bring on people to discuss, as experts, the President's mental state even though
they have never diagnosed the President. Then, when one psychiatrist disagreed it was relevant and then insisted
President Trump had perhaps killed more people than Hitler, Stalin, and Mao, Stelter only interrupted the man to insist
talking about the President's sanity was appropriate.
Allen
Frances is crazy, which is ironic since he's CNN's contributing psychiatrist. If you hear someone say President
Trump (or any other American, for that matter) could be responsible for "many more million deaths" than Adolf Hitler, Joseph
Stalin, and Mao Zedong, you'd probably think they were crazy. It's not just demonstrably false. It's so far
beyond left field that he's actually left the stadium of sanity. But that's CNN contributor Dr. Allen
Frances. This world renowned psychiatrist is clearly suffering from the epidemic of Trump Derangement Syndrome, and
so far there's no known cure that can bring people back from reality other than massive exposure to the truth.
CNN's
Brian Stelter Lets Psychiatrist Claim Trump Worse Than Hitler, Mao, Stalin. CNN's Brian Stelter allowed
psychiatrist Allen Frances to make wildly false claims about President Donald Trump on his Sunday show and offered zero
pushback to any of Frances' remarks which sparked intense backlash against the far-left network.
Crazy
News Network bores us with worse than Hitler tripe. Brian Stelter had a psychiatrist on his show to say
President Donald John Trump is worse than Hitler. Instead the man said the president was worse than Hitler, Mao and
Stalin combined. For this Stelter apologized after people pointed out the president has not killed 100 million
people. Stelter tweeted, "I agree that I should have interrupted after that line. I wish I had heard him say it,
but I was distracted by tech difficulties (that's why the show open didn't look the way it normally does, I had two computers
at the table, etc). Not hearing the comment is my fault." Apparently CNN is about as well equipped as a UHF station in
the 1970s.
The
opposite of journalism: CNN is encouraging government officials to lie. Last week, CNN announced that it
is hiring Andrew McCabe, the former deputy director of the FBI. According to the FBI inspector general, McCabe lied
repeatedly to investigators, including FBI Director James Comey. Some of the lies were under oath. McCabe's lies
were designed to cover up "misconduct" on his part: He had violated FBI policy by leaking information about an
investigation into the Clinton Foundation to the Wall Street Journal during the 2016 election. The leak was "designed
to advance his personal interest at the expense of department leadership," the IG reported. Naturally, McCabe also lied
to the public immediately after his firing, claiming it had been some form of political retaliation. That
15
former spooks who work at CNN and MSNBC now. CNN added to its deep roster of former FBI and CIA officials-turned-analysts
Friday [8/23/2019] with the hiring of Andrew McCabe, the former FBI deputy director fired for lack of candor during an investigation
last year. McCabe is the tenth ex-FBI, CIA or intelligence community official CNN has hired during the Trump administration,
according to a Daily Caller News Foundation analysis. MSNBC has followed closely behind, having hired five former officials,
including former CIA Director John Brennan. CNN was widely mocked on Friday after announcing the McCabe hiring, largely because
the network has criticized its competitors for hiring former Trump administration officials.
CNN
Just Paid Off Another Corrupt Deep State Leaker With A TV Contract. CNN announced Thursday [8/22/2019] it has
hired former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe as a contributor after the network criticized other networks for hiring former
Trump White House press secretaries Sean Spicer and Sarah Sanders.
CNN Hires Fired FBI Perjurer Andrew McCabe, The
Twitterverse Is Not Amused. Yesterday CNN blasted Fox News for hiring Sarah Huckabee Sanders. Today
[8/23/2019] CNN announced it had hired disgraced former FBI official Andrew McCabe despite the fact he perjured himself
before Congress and was fired for cause from the Bureau. Do I smell mendacity?
CNN
complains about the rehabilitation of known liars, then hires Andrew McCabe. CNN has added disgraced former FBI
deputy director Andrew McCabe to its already-bloated roster of contributors drawn from the intelligence community. The
announcement comes not even a week after CNN dedicated significant airtime to protesting that former White House press
secretaries Sean Spicer and Sarah Huckabee Sanders are allowed to seek professional employment. The McCabe hire was
reported Friday morning [8/23/2019] on social media by CNN media reporter Oliver Darcy.
Gutfeld on Cuomo's
Trump aging conspiracy. Once the face of hard news, CNN is now the butt of America's jokes. The latest
oddity? Chris Cuomo conspires over President Trump's appearance. Yep. He looks exactly the same as when he
became president, and that can't be good. [...] Only on the Clown News Network can an anchor wonder if the president is
"augmenting his physical reality."
Illegal
Alien Caught Lying About ICE Separating Her From Breastfeeding Baby After CNN Pushed Her Fake Story. It isn't an accident
that CNN is considered fake news by most Americans. The low-ratings network that can be seen playing in every major airport, has a
long history of distorting the truth to fit their far-left liberal narrative. When it comes to protecting and defending the flow
of illegal aliens across our southern border, there isn't a lie that's too big for the leftist media. Last week, CNN reported about
an undocumented migrant mom (illegal alien) who was swept up in the Mississippi I.C.E. raids. It's strange, that CNN never
mentioned that the "migrant mom" was using a fake social security number.
CNN
steers softball interview carefully to give violent Antifa a new voice. Leave it to CNN to give voice to violent
Antifa thugs in the wake of Saturday's clash with right-wing protesters. [...] CNN reporter Sara Sidner interviewed two masked
members of the left-wing mob, who identified themselves as members of the Youth Liberation Front. The riot helmet one of
them is wearing features the communist hammer and sickle, which speaks volumes on the ideology they speak of. The
reporter sets the tone by noting that Antifa is "standing up against these far right groups," before tip-toeing around just
how violent the group is.
The
3 Types Of 'Journalists' Who Destroyed Media Credibility. As the news media completes its credibility death
spiral and transitions from objective reporting to subjective editorializing, it's worth looking at the various types of
"journalists" who enabled the descent. [...] And it's not just a CNN problem. Yes, CNN is the most glaring and easy to
pick on because they're so wildly over-the-top with their partisanship, dishonesty and bias. But it's a problem that
plagues virtually the entire media institution. They have all transitioned from being credible, impartial, unbiased,
straight news mediums — to almost entirely subjective and opinion-based propagandists who spend 2% of the time
reporting actual facts, and the remaining 98% framing and characterizing those facts to fit their partisan narratives/agendas.
Trump Green Card
Rule: Three Lefty Lies Debunked. All too typical of the nonsense that has been said and written about the
regulation is the following headline from CNN: "Cuccinelli rewrites Statue of Liberty poem to make case for limiting
immigration." This ridiculous claim distorts an answer the acting director made during an interview with Rachel Martin
at NPR. Martin asked him, "Would you also agree that Emma Lazarus' words etched on the Statue of Liberty —
'Give me your tired, your poor ... ' — are also part of the American ethos?" [...] Cuccinelli's mistake involved
his assumption that Martin and her fellow "journalists" were literate enough in American history to get his point. It
went straight over their heads, of course. The Lazarus sonnet was written in 1883 for the purpose of raising money for
the pedestal upon which the Statue of Liberty stands, but it didn't reflect U.S. immigration law then or now.
The Immigration Act of 1882 was the first comprehensive immigration statute enacted by Congress, and it excluded anyone "unable
to take care of him or herself without becoming a public charge."
CNN's Most
Insane Chyron Yet? The people who work at CNN want you to fear and hate your family, friends, and neighbors who
support President Trump. And in any given hour of their programming I can show you no less than 50 examples of
dishonest, unfair and inflammatory fake news being broadcast from their traphouse studios. But here's just one example
from this morning that's particularly galling in its desperate overreach, all predicated on efforts to create hatred and
division in America. The people at CNN are literally trying to convince their audiences that mental health actually has
nothing to do with mass shootings.
CNN
Claims Trump 'Rolled Back' Obama Rule To Keep Guns Away From The 'Mentally Ill.' Nope. On Monday [8/5/2019],
CNN seemingly attempted to paint President Donald Trump as culpable for tragic mass shootings over the weekend in El Paso,
Texas and Dayton, Ohio. Anchors Poppy Harlow and John Avlon claimed on-air that the president eliminated a proposed
Obama-era regulation that would keep firearms out of the hands of the "mentally ill." The proposed rule, however, was
seriously broad, undermining the Second and Fourth Amendment rights of tens of thousands of Americans in constitutionally
dubious fashion. The restrictions were based merely upon the fact that those on the list had received assistance in
managing their Social Security disability payments. Even the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which has become
increasingly partisan over the years, vehemently opposed the regulation.
CNN
Contributor: Confronting Trump's Base Is 'Confronting White Nationalism'. CNN continued bashing President
Trump for his rhetoric against the Squad on Tuesday [7/23/2019]. CNN Right Now invited Wajahat Ali, a New York
Times columnist and CNN contributor, on to speak about Trump's comments. Ali criticized the President and his
supporters for contributing to a "pattern" of what he considers "white nationalism." He then spouted out a number of
falsehoods to back up this claim. The columnist accused Trump of calling Mexicans rapists, a lie that even Politifact
gave a false rating to during the 2016 election. He also falsely stated that there was a "Muslim ban," but the Trump
administration has never implemented a ban on Muslims entering the country.
Unfit
To Print Episode 17: Pro-Trump Women Punch Back At CNN's Biased Questions. CNN tried to bait a group of
Republican women into calling President Donald Trump racist, but it backfired when the women fought back. The video of
these women calling out CNN's Randi Kaye for her biased questioning is an all-time classic, [...]
CNN's
Bakari Sellers: Trump Administration Is 'Literally Terrorizing People' With ICE Raids. Former Florida gubernatorial
candidate Andrew Gillum argued Sunday [7/14/2019] that the Trump administration is "literally terrorizing people" by going through with
planned ICE raids on illegal immigrants under deportation orders. During a panel segment of "State of the Union" with Jake Tapper,
Gillum called the raids a "strategy" designed to "demonize black and brown people" in order to secure a second term in the White House.
'So
Dishonest': Vice President Pence Blasts CNN After Visiting Migrant Shelters. Vice President Mike Pence visited
migrant shelters in the McAllen, Texas, area Friday and blasted CNN on Twitter following the stops, particularly for its
"dishonest" coverage of his trip. "CNN is so dishonest," the vice president tweeted late Friday [7/12/2019].
"Today we took reporters to a detention facility on the border for families and children and all told us they were being
treated well."
CNN mired in a credibility
crisis as ratings continue to collapse, experts say. CNN's audience shriveled in the second quarter of 2019,
averaging only 541,000 total viewers, less than half Fox News Channel's 1.3 million average. But CNN struggled even
more during the primetime hours of 8-11 p.m. ET, finishing as the fifteenth most-watched network on basic cable behind
networks such as TLC, Investigation Discovery and the Hallmark Channel. CNN averaged a dismal 761,000 primetime viewers
while FNC averaged 2.4 million.
CNN Ratings Tank.
I've been writing over the last few days about the fact that "get woke, go broke" doesn't always apply to companies that pose
as social justice warriors. On the other hand, CNN's formula — obsessive, over the top Trump hatred, every
day, all the time — has bombed.
CNN's Credibility Crisis.
President Trump in April mocked CNN (yet again), tweeting out a report that the cable news network had registered its lowest
viewership ratings of 2019. [...] Now, two months later, the news just keeps getting worse for the far-left network.
According to recent reports from several credible sites, including The Hill and Forbes, CNN has suffered a 16 percent
primetime ratings collapse. This is what happens when you put all your eggs in one Mueller shaped basket.
Don
Lemon And CNN Can't Stop The Trump/Hitler Comparisons. In a discussion with Chris Cuomo on CNN, Don Lemon once
again made a Trump/Hitler comparison. [Video clip] [...] This was shortly after CNN cut away from the Trump rally when the
President attacked the media and the crowd started chanting "CNN s****".
Acosta
Is His Own Worst 'Enemy'. [Jim] Acosta is pitching a book called "The Enemy of the People" and he wants you to
think he is "the people." He isn't. Is he "The Enemy of the People"? That's giving him too much credit, but he
is the enemy of the truth.
Fusion
GPS Best Bud At CNN Runs Interference For Bogus Steele Dossier. After President Trump commented on the idea of
receiving "foreign dirt" on an opponent on Thursday, cable news pundits fully dedicated themselves to moving the goal posts
for what constitutes colluding with a foreign adversary. On "At This Hour With Kate Bolduan," CNN reporter Evan Perez
simultaneously downplayed the significance of the Steele dossier and failed to explain which 2016 campaign had actually paid
a foreign adversary for opposition research (spoiler: it was the Hillary Clinton campaign). Perez seemed to conclude
that Trump's hypothetical comments are much worse than the actual effect the Steele dossier had on the 2016 election because
the dossier was written by someone connected to U.S. ally Great Britain, and because it was obtained by the FBI.
Don
Lemon Tries to Convince Viewers CNN is Not Biased, Does Not Hate Trump. Don Lemon has begun a campaign to
convince viewers CNN does not hate Trump, love the Democrats or engage in biased reporting. Earlier this month,
speaking at the Financial Time Future of News event, Lemon said flatly the network is "not liberal," which set off a storm of
reaction from conservatives in the media.
Don
Lemon and Jim Acosta assert CNN is not an anti-Trump outlet. CNN White House reporter Jim Acosta and host Don
Lemon said the network is not an anti-President Trump outlet, they are simply "holding their feet to the fire" because they
will ask the hard questions to anyone who is in power.
CNN
Is Really Upset That Scot Peterson Got Arrested Over His Cowardice. You can always count on CNN to be on the
wrong side of every issue and their response to Scot Peterson being arrested for his cowardice (among other things) during
the Parkland shooting is no exception. While there are questions about whether Peterson has legal liability, there's no
doubt he was a primary factor in so many children being killed that day. He sat idly by as a gunman walked around the
school shooting people when it was his job to respond with force. To give you an idea of CNN's bias on this issue,
Chris Cillizza once notably quipped on Twitter that a "good guy with a gun doesn't always stop a bad guy." This echoed
CNN's softball treatment of Sheriff Scott Israel at a town hall where they instead savaged Dana Loesch, who had nothing to do
with the shooting.
CNN
Tries Turning Trump "Special Day of Prayer" Into "White Evangelical" Day. Today [6/2/2019] is the day devoted
Evangelist Franklin Graham, son of Billy Graham, has called a "Special Day of Prayer" to protect President Donald Trump from
his "enemies". While Franklin Graham is revered by millions of Christians world wide as an inspiring Evangelist, just
as his father was before him, according to CNN Religion Editor Daniel Burke, he's a "White Evangelical". Because
Evangelists come in all colors and all races, calling Franklin Graham a "White Evangelical" is racist. The word
"evangelical', incidentally is an adjective rather than a noun.
Exposing
the RINO Underground By Smoking Out the 'Never Trumpers' One-by-One. Honestly — really,
honestly — who ever heard of Ana Navarro before she became a CNN "expert Republican" on what is wrong with
Trump and with the entire Republican political agenda? [...] Between those rare glimpses of Navarro, and occasional snippets
of that Thing that get aired on Hannity or Laura when that vile object is shown obnoxiously filing her nails during a
"debate," I have figured this out: [#1] She claims to be a Republican. [#2] She takes the
Democrat Left side on virtually every single issue that gets discussed, no matter how little it has to do with anything
Trump. [#3] She was an advisor to John McCain. [#4] She was an even higher-up advisor in
Florida to Jeb! Bush.
CNN
Blatantly Lies to Protect Far-Left Abortionists. A left wing conspiracy theory news channel Friday [5/31/2019]
made blatantly false claims in order to make the abortionists on the far-left seem less radical. "Vice President Mike
Pence suggested Thursday that abortion rights activists support 'infanticide,' echoing false claims made last month by
President Donald Trump about doctors killing babies that have already been born," said CNN. But there are two obvious
problems with CNN's analysis. The first is that Trump never said that.
CNN's
Cooper Complains About FB After They Won't Remove Funny Pelosi Parody Video. CNN wants to monopolize information.
They tried and failed to swing the 2016 election; it was because they had competition. CNN and NBC are the biggest sources of
completely fake news. Eighty million people tuned in to CNN to watch a wholly rigged presidential debate. The FCC should
have pulled their license to broadcast. NBC tried to incite a race riot in Sanford, FL with their doctored 911 tape:
["He's black' SPLICE "he's up to no good"]. They tried to make the police dispatcher seem involved in the phony racist
talk. And that's the way they presented it. And when they found out the shooter wasn't "white" like they had assumed,
they called him a "White Hispanic" No one was prosecuted. NBC just said, "my bad" then went on spewing fake news.
Seriously, America needs to shut these phony news organizations down — permanently.
Impeach or get off
the pot, Democrats. When House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler and Speaker Nancy Pelosi claimed that the
United States had been plunged into a "constitutional crisis," a large swath of the media took to plying this fantasy for
them. "Ever wonder what a constitutional crisis looks like? Well, open your eyes," CNN's Don Lemon explained to
his viewers. "The president of the United States is just blowing right through our system of checks and balances, the
very thing that is supposed to keep our Congress, the judiciary, and the executive branch working, which means our country
working." None of this is remotely true. Our checks and balances are working exactly as they should.
CNN Lays Off Almost Entire Division,
Surprises Employees As 'Crazy Rumor' Comes True. CNN laid off almost all of its health care coverage division
Tuesday [5/21/2019], in a move the network called a "crazy rumor" less than three weeks ago. While Dr. Sanjay
Gupta is expected to keep his job, most of the rest of the division, based out of Atlanta, were released.
CNN
Completely Edits African American Pro-Lifer Out Of Abortion Documentary. Last October, Bell produced a show
about abortion and the CNN documentary crew tapped Students for Life of America (SFLA) to provide a pro-life perspective for
the episode. The group sent their Minority Outreach Coordinator Elizabeth Parker (who is African American) to represent
the organization and the unborn on camera. Naturally Parker and her colleagues were excited to see how the interview
turned out in the final cut and honored to be included in a show aimed at "exploring communities across America". In a
discussion about abortion, it goes without saying that the pro-life community is an unavoidable and vital part of the
conversation — literally half of it. When the May 19th premiere finally came around the SFLA team was
disappointed to discover Parker had been cut out of the documentary altogether. Even worse, it turned out there were no
pro-life views represented at all. CNN even cut out footage of pro-life advocates outside local abortion facilities.
Parker says she suspects their views simply didn't fit the narrative they were trying to weave. Rather than present a
two-sided story, they simply cut the side that didn't fit the script.
Our
Collective Dive off the Cliff. The burning of the Cathedral of Notre Dame — in the heart of Paris,
in the heart of France, in the heart of Europe, in the heart of Christendom and Western civilization — was an
absolute cultural catastrophe. [...] Over at CNN, Frida Ghitis penned a heartwarming, sincere panegyric, but one in which she
cannot help but refer to Notre Dame as "a building, technically a religious structure." Technically a religious
structure? I wonder what tipped Ghitis off. The giant crucifix bestriding the altar? The religious imagery
that adorns literally every surface of the place? The masses of people who gather there daily to pray? What facet
of the building does Ghitis consider technically a non-religious structure?
Continuing
plunge of CNN, MSNBC ratings reveals that fake news is a bad business strategy. The catastrophic ratings
decline for both CNN and MSNBC was no temporary blip following publication of the Mueller report. Both cable news
outlets had heavily promoted the hoax of Russian collusion with the Trump administration, teasing the hopes of Trump-haters
for impeachment and prosecution for treason. Now, those disappointed viewers have gone away, and continue to stay away.
CNN
Goes Melodramatic To Push Gun Control Agenda After Colorado Shooting. CNN took to not only politicizing the
recent school shooting in Colorado but doing so with a melodramatic new gimmick. Brooke Baldwin simply emoted into the
camera as images flashed behind her on a screen. First, you see Baldwin at her desk at CNN. Then, you see the inside of
a classroom where students are discussing the incident. "I'm afraid that one day I'll go to school and I'll never come
out," one grieving student sobs. "What actions will you take to protect people like me and my classmates from this
happening?" Then we see Baldwin again, hands folded in her lap, glaring angrily at the camera.
CNN's
Jim Acosta Caught Lying About Trump Again. CNN's fake news reporter, who is really a political activist, Jim
Acosta is lying again. Acosta claimed that Trump painted asylum seekers with a broad brush, accusing them of misleading
immigration authorities at the border.
CNN's
Jim Acosta Misrepresents Trump Speech on Asylum Seekers. CNN White House correspondent Jim Acosta misrepresented
remarks President Donald Trump made during a Rose Garden speech selling a White House immigration plan. Acosta tweeted
during the Thursday [5/16/2019] speech that Trump had "[painted] asylum seekers with a broad brush," saying of them "these
are frivolous claims."
CNN's
Jim Acosta Spreads Misquote from Trump Immigration Speech. CNN's chief White House correspondent Jim Acosta on
Thursday misquoted a portion of President Donald Trump's immigration speech and was quickly met with a fact-check by a
Breitbart News reporter. Speaking in the Rose Garden, President Donald Trump unveiled immigration reform proposals
aimed at increasing the quota for skilled workers. During his remarks, the president assailed some asylum seekers'
abuses of the country's immigration system. "
CNN
Further Normalizes Leftist Antifa Terrorists. It's been over three years since the FBI and the Department of
Homeland security referred to the radical leftist Antifa movement's behavior as that of a "domestic terrorist" organization,
but that hasn't stopped CNN from promoting their activities. Just days after CNN host Chris Cuomo argued that Antifa
was a "true" and "good cause," social justice warrior Kamau Bell on Sunday's [5/5/2019] United Shades of America
offered a national platform to an Antifa member while offering no pushback against their violent tactics. Completely
ignoring the terrorist designation, Bell sat down with a young woman who only went by the name Ariel. As they began
their discussion, Bell allowed her to twist and lie about what Antifa actually was: [...]
CNN
Contributor Insanely Claims Unborn Babies Aren't Even Human. On CNN's "Primetime with Chris Cuomo" on Monday
night, a segment on the legality of state-level fetal heartbeat bills quickly spiraled into a chaotic debate about whether
unborn children should be considered human beings. CNN contributor and erstwhile New York City Democratic politician
Christine Quinn said, "When a woman is pregnant, that is not a human being inside of her." When guest Rick Santorum
asked CNN Host Chris Cuomo if he disagreed "that at the moment of conception that a child is human and alive?" Cumono
replied that means it's "viable." When Santorum asked, "Is it biologically a human life?" Quinn shouted, "No!"
Closely related: CNN
cutting staff by as many as 300 jobs. Trump hatred has been good for the [New York Times], with digital subscriptions
up substantially (over $700 million in revenue last year) as the paper became the premier source of anti-Trump fulminations.
But with CNN, the story is very different. The network that pioneered cable news long ago lost its dominant position to Fox
News, and since Donald Trump became president has bet its future on the Russia Hoax, and lost.
CNN
says 100 employees accepted voluntary buyouts in response to layoffs 'rumor'. CNN says roughly 100 employees
have accepted voluntary buyouts a month after an overhaul by parent company AT&T. According to Deadline, AT&T's decision
to offer buyouts, similar to those offered at HBO and the remnants of Turner, was in an effort to chip away at approximately
$170 billion in outstanding debt, which AT&T agreed to take on as a result of their acquisition of Time Warner announced in
2016. In March, AT&T restructured the majority of their TV assets under the umbrella of WarnerMedia, including CNN.
CNN is
More Dangerous Than Banned Voices. You know what CNN is. It's the network that took the lead in promoting the
false narratives that Michael Brown and others killed while violently resisting arrest were, instead, innocent victims of
racist American cops. You might remember that photo of "CNN Newsroom" hosts Sally Kohn, Mel Robbins and Margaret Hoover with
their hands in the air while their co-host Sunny Hostin held up a sign saying, "I can't breathe." The fake news about
Michael Brown and others like Eric Garner who were killed while resisting lawful arrest was so widely broadcast that everyone
knew exactly what the celebrity anchors meant without even seeing the so-called victims' names. The smug and self-righteous
look on their faces alone was almost enough to tell the tale.
Clintons
and CNN plunging together. Maybe it's a sign of the times. President and Mrs. Clinton can't sell
tickets and CNN can't draw an audience. [...] So what's going on? The Clintons are worn out and have nothing to say.
It does not help that the former President is a loser in the "me-too" age. The former First Lady can only do interviews
with Rachel Maddow for fear of getting a serious question. CNN is a victim of its own stupidity. They became a
news channel obsessed with everything anti-Trump and can't survive the Mueller report.
ObamaGate:
No Misdemeanors, Only High Crimes. Or look instead at Anderson Cooper, CNN's putative doyen, who can't even
garner 0.3 percent of the population as viewers for his "flagship" program, and who recently accused Jared Kushner of
"gaslighting" the nation over Russia; in other words of making statements aimed at convincing the listeners that they are
insane. This from the network that has so stoked the flames of Russia conspiracy-mongering every day for two years,
that they publish outlandish pieces on Robert Mueller's sealing indictments against the president, and as Cooper's fellow
show host Chris Cuomo qualifies the president's public statements as those made by a convict already wearing an "orange
jumpsuit," statements that are less gaslighting than full on tinfoil-hattery.
CNN's
Chris Cuomo Made 11 Misleading Statements About the Mueller Report. The world already knows CNN's Chris Cuomo
is not the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, during an interview with former Attorney General Michael Mukasey on
Tuesday night, Cuomo proved not only that he's eager to mislead his audience, but that he doesn't have the capacity to grasp
even the fundamental bottom line of the Mueller Report and has no idea how our three separate branches of the federal
government operate. From Maggie Haberman to John Podhoertz to Bill Kristol to Mitt Romney to Chris Cuomo... Nepotism
is replacing meritocracy and America is all that much stupider for it.
Trump
is Popping in the Polls. Watch most cable or network news shows and the message is clear —
President Donald Trump is unpopular, especially compared to the dozens of fresh faces attempting to challenge him for the
White House in 2020. Some of the faces are not so fresh as three of the leading contenders — Biden, Sanders, and
Warren are septuagenarians. Despite the exonerating Mueller report, Trump is still on the ropes, about to be impeached,
a Russian agent, and so on. Trump is also a Nazi, racist, homophobe, Islamophobe, and sexist pig. Nobody likes him.
At least that's what CNN says. If this was truly the case, Trump should be polling in the low 30s at best, with most of the
country giving him and his administration a thumbs down on performance and results. Yet reality is far different.
Jim
Acosta doing his best to prove Trump is right about CNN as 'fake news'. CNN has been accused repeatedly by
President Trump of being "fake news." He couldn't be more correct, given that CNN's coverage of the border crisis, which
not too long ago was characterized by a drumbeat of reports debunking any crisis, is now all about reporting that yes,
indeed, there is a crisis. [...] Remember the CNN drumbeat of "not a crisis" and "no emergency at the border"? They're
singing a different tune now, [...]
Jake Tapper: CNN Didn't
Get 'Anything' Wrong In Russiagate Reporting. Jake Tapper said Sunday that CNN has not gotten "anything" wrong
during the course of reporting on Russiagate, even though his network has bungled numerous stories over the past two
years. "I'm not sure what you're saying the media got wrong. The media reported the investigation was going
on. Other than the people in the media on the left, not on this network, I don't know anybody that got anything wrong,"
Tapper said during an exchange with acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney. "We didn't say there was a
conspiracy. We said Mueller was investigating a conspiracy."
Tucker
Carlson exposes CNN's slavish obedience to Democrats' demands. Last night, Tucker Carlson offered a landmark,
devastating critique of CNN's descent from a legitimate news source to a propaganda adjunct of the Democratic Party.
Using CNN's own broadcasts yesterday, he proved his case that there is actual collusion between the two organizations, the
Democratic Party and the pioneer cable news channel. This is must-see TV (to appropriate a slogan invented by NBC) that
almost fatally discredits a competitor that already is facing a viewership crisis, with half of its viewership melting away
in the realization that they have been fed a hoax for over two years. [Video clip]
How
CNN misled its viewers. In our hyperpartisan world, in which so many people watch only media that will give
them news with which they agree, CNN viewers understandably expected the Mueller report to find overwhelming evidence that
President Trump colluded, conspired with and is beholden to Russia. After all, that is what they have been hearing for
many months. Pundit after pundit, commentator after commentator, host after host already had made up their minds:
President Trump was guilty and should be indicted, impeached or removed under the 25th Amendment.
Jeff
Zucker: No Regrets on CNN's Russia Hoax Coverage, 'We Are Not Investigators'. CNN Worldwide president
Jeff Zucker is pushing back against critics accusing the news network of being one of the chief propagators of a debunked
Trump-Russia conspiracy theory after special counsel Robert Mueller cleared the president's 2016 campaign of alleged
collusion with the Kremlin. In an interview with the New York Times, Zucker said he was "entirely comfortable"
with CNN's Trump-Russia coverage and suggested it was entirely appropriate to give near around-the-clock-coverage due to the
story's magnitude. "
Dan
Bongino: More evidence for 'Sasquatch' than for 'half the stuff CNN puts on the air'. Fox News
contributor Dan Bongino weighed in on the pending lawsuit against CNN over its coverage of the viral confrontation between
the Covington Catholic High School students and Native American elder Nathan Phillips, saying the liberal network has a serious
trust issue. The legal team of high school student Nicholas Sandmann launched the massive $275 million lawsuit
against CNN, accusing the network of ignoring the facts and putting its "anti-Trump agenda first" after portraying the MAGA
hat-wearing teenagers as the aggressors in the altercation.
Acosta:
Trump Is Spreading 'Virus' Against the Media, Right Has Bigger Media Presence. A day after he offered a tired
assertion that it was "surreal" that he and his media colleagues were questioning the White House about President Trump's
mental stability, CNN chief White House correspondent and carnival barker Jim Acosta was back on Tuesday's CNN Newsroom
offering another lengthy diatribe and meltdown to the delight of his colleagues. In four-and-a-half minutes, Acosta
attacked the Daily Caller for a "softball" question to the President, bashed Trump for spreading a "virus" around the world
that the media has a liberal bias, and even suggested conservatives have a bigger media and social media influence than liberals.
CNN President
Calls Fox News a 'Propaganda Network'. During his speech at South By Southwest in Austin, Texas, last week CNN president
Jeff Zucker renewed his criticism of cable news rival Fox News Channel, calling the network a "propaganda network." He also said
Fox's relationship to the White House is "completely symbiotic" and detrimental to journalism. Zucker addressed Fox News's
response to the DNC's decision barring the network from hosting one of the 2020 presidential primary debates.
CNN
guest connects New Zealand mosque massacre to Trump only minutes after it happened! The hate for Trump has
become vile at networks like CNN. Last night [3/14/2019], as the news was unfolding about these mosque attacks in New
Zealand, Intercept columnist Mehdi Hasan suggested that Trump was partly to blame for these kind of attacks around the world.
This
is CNN? Primetime shows filled with liberal opinion, not straight news as network claims. CNN touts its
primetime lineup as being straight, just-the-facts news, but anyone tuning in to the network's evening programming can expect
a heavy dose of liberal opinion, as "Anderson Cooper 360," "CNN Tonight" and "Cuomo Prime Time" don't always align with
founder Ted Turner's bare bones, objective approach to journalism. "Anderson Cooper is a mix of news and opinion, but
Don Lemon and Chris Cuomo are obviously heavy on opinion and use the news as a launching pad for those opinions," Cornell
University Law Professor William Jacobson told Fox News. "There's nothing inherently wrong with that, so long as they
are not mischaracterized as part of the news operation."
Study:
CNN's 'The Situation Room' Is a Week-long Promo for Dem Investigations. CNN's Wolf Blitzer has spent the past
week using his evening show The Situation Room as a platform for Democratic lawmakers to plug their numerous investigations
of President Trump. Blitzer, a veteran reporter and host on the network, is not a name that immediately springs to mind
when one thinks of biased or outlandish statements from CNN journalists. However, the many interviews he has conducted
with politicians on the Hill — a staple of his show — tell a story of bias through careful and deliberate
framing of facts.
People Who Watch CNN
are Less Likely to Believe Trump is Telling the Truth on Russia. CNN viewers are far less likely to believe
that President Donald Trump is being honest about the Russia investigation than people who watch MSNBC or Fox News, according
to a new NBC News and Wall Street Journal poll. The February 2019 poll found that just 37 percent of people agree that
the president has been truthful about the special counsel's investigation into Russian interference, while 58 percent
disagree that he has been truthful. Opinions regarding Trump's honesty, however, are even more divided among people
based on which cable news channel they primarily watch.
CNN's
Vinograd: Trump's CPAC Speech Had Moment That Sounded Like Hitler. On Saturday's "CNN Newsroom," CNN
National Security Analyst Sam Vinograd stated that during President Trump's CPAC speech, he sounded "a lot like" Adolf
Hitler, and that he also made statements "that really looked like Vladimir Putin scripted his speech."
CNN's
Acosta Caught Lying During Tantrum at Hanoi Press Conference. CNN's Jim Acosta lied during an on-air tantrum
after President Trump did not call on him at a press conference in Hanoi, reports NewsBusters. After ending his summit
without a deal with North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un, Trump addressed the world media and took a number of questions.
He did not, however, call on Jim Acosta, the anti-Trump activist at the far-left CNN. At the end of the press conference,
CNN brought Acosta on air to recap the event. Naturally, the crybully opened by making everything all about himself and
immediately started lying.
CNN Spins Its Role
in Jussie Smollett Hoax. CNN is in the business of spin. Yet it is not doing a good job of spinning its
own role in the imploded Jussie Smollett hate hoax. CNN propagandist Brooke Baldwin, personifying the leftist
"mainstream" media just as Jussie Smollett personifies black victimhood, sneered, "This is America in 2019" while hyping the
hoax, even though Smollett's story was conspicuously fake from the beginning.
Look
What CNN Is Outraged Over Now. The media are outraged over the silly, like how President Trump gets two scoops
of ice cream or doesn't have a pet dog in the White House. They are also incensed over what they believe is serious,
that Trump colluded with Putin to steal the election from Hillary Clinton, despite there being not one iota of evidence
supporting their belief. It's much like believing that Elvis and Bigfoot are regularly splashing around with the Loch
Ness Monster. There is plenty the media could be outraged about but are not. Where is the outrage over the Obama
administration spying on its political opponent's presidential campaign, then, when caught, using unverified opposition
research to obtain a FISA warrant to cover its misdeeds? Followed by finagling a special counsel appointment to put the
blanket of investigational secrecy over its illegal and treasonous activities? No outrage.
CNN
Mocks Trump for Eating Omelet During Border Emergency. To prove that there's a border emergency, President
Trump must stop eating omelets! Ridiculous, you might say. And yet, on this morning's [2/18/2019] New Day,
CNN's John Avlon, Alisyn Camerota and Jeff Toobin mocked President Trump for eating an omelet, somehow suggesting it debunks
the existence of an emergency.
Autopsy of a Dead Coup.
[Scroll down] So-called "bombshell," "watershed," "turning-point," and "walls closing in" fake news aired in 24-hour
news bulletin cycles. The media went from fabrications about Trump's supposed removal of the bust of Martin Luther
King, Jr. from the Oval Office, to the mythologies in the Steele dossier, to lies about the Trump Tower meeting, to
assurances that Michael Cohen would testify to Trump's suborning perjury, and on and on. CNN soon proved that it is no
longer a news organization at all — as reporters like Gloria Borger, Chris Cuomo, Eric Lichtblau, Manu Raju, Brian
Rokus, Jake Tapper, Jeff Zeleny, and teams such as Jim Sciutto, Carl Bernstein, and Marshall Cohen as well as Thomas Frank,
Eric Lichtblau, and Lex Harris all trafficked in false rumors and unproven gossip detrimental to Trump, while hosts and guest
hosts such as Reza Aslan, the late Anthony Bourdain, and Anderson Cooper stooped to obscenity and grossness to attack Trump.
High-powered
Dem Andre Fladell: What's hurting the country the most is dysfunctional and disgusting CNN. Palm Beach
County Democrat and political powerbroker Andre Fladell is as angry at CNN's fake news as Donald J. Trump. And, it
sounds a little different when it's coming from one of the most powerful Democrats in the Sunshine State. "What's
hurting the country the most, in my opinion, is the dysfunctional and disgusting reporting of a cable channel called CNN,"
Fladell said during a meeting earlier this month of the United South County Democrats.
The
Biggest Threat To Press Freedom Is The Media Itself. In December 2017, CNN reported that Donald Trump Jr.
received an email giving him the hacked Democratic National Committee emails released by WikiLeaks before they were
public. MSNBC and CBS "independently" confirmed the story. It was later revealed that the date on the email was
wrong, and Donald Trump Jr. didn't get the emails before they were public. CNN eventually revealed they never saw the
original email, and based on the very lawyerly and suspect denials issued, it appears that the anonymous sources who gave CNN
the story, as well as confirming it to MSNBC and CBS, were Democratic partisans from the House intel committee. CNN did
not discipline the reporters who botched the story. There was no formal retraction. Instead, CNN rewrote the
story so it was an inane recounting of how Donald Trump Jr. got an email about a big news event.
Watch
CNN try to rationalize away their own instant poll showing 76% of viewers positive on Trump's SOTU. I don't
think the suits at CNN anticipated either the quality of State of the Union speech that President Trump delivered or the
positive public reaction to it when they went to the expense and trouble of an instant poll. The segment they broadcast
on it is a classic of rationalization, attempting to minimize the outcome that went so contrary to their own
prejudices. A stunning 59% were very positive, with another 17% somewhat positive, for a grand total of
76% — a landslide in anyone's book.
CNN
State of the Union Promo: 'President Trump in Nancy Pelosi's House'. CNN promoted its coverage of Tuesday's
State of the Union address by describing it as "President Trump in Nancy Pelosi's house." The language gave it the
appearance of a sporting event rather than a solemn address by the president of the United States before a joint session of
Congress. The promo also appeared to be playing up the rivalry between the two political leaders now that Pelosi's
Democrats have taken the House majority. While the State of the Union address is given in the House Chamber and Pelosi
(D., Calif.) is the speaker, the House of Representatives is more frequently referred to as the "People's House."
CNN
Chyron Labels Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam a Republican. CNN aired a chyron Friday evening [2/1/2019]
labeling Virginia Democrat Gov. Ralph Northam a Republican during a report on the Virginia Democrat apologizing for a
racist medical school yearbook photo depicting two men — one of them himself — in blackface and Ku
Klux Klan garb. The chyron aired at 9:00 p.m. EST during a CNN broadcast of Anderson Cooper 360, which
showed a video of Northam addressing the inflammatory yearbook photo in a video posted to his Twitter account.
Embattled
Virginia Governor Ralph Northam Abruptly Changes Political Affiliation. Ordinarily you'd think this was an
accident but then you have to ask yourself: how is this accident even possible? Why is it that all these mistakes
CNN makes run in exactly one direction? When was the last time a damaging but false story was spread about any Democrat
by CNN? When was the last time they made a blunder on their chyrons when it hurt a Democrat?
This
Is CNN: Network Labeled Dem VA Governor Embroiled In Racist Yearbook Fiasco Was A Republican. It didn't take
long for the news media to hit another iceberg. This time it was in the Old Dominion. Virginia became the subject
of media attention (okay, some media attention) since Democrats tried to push a bill that would've permitted abortions up
until the moment of birth. It was a ghastly bill that was rejected. Still, Democratic Gov. Ralph Northam, a
medical doctor, decided to weigh in during a radio interview this week, where he was torched for his remarks that pretty much
detailed how this bill would permit the murder of babies. The Democrats' abortion extremism was on full display.
He responded to the blowback by saying he doesn't regret his remarks about the legislation.
Roger
Stone's lawyer offers proof CNN is in bed with FBI. Documentation was released yesterday [2/4/2019], reportedly
from Roger Stone's lawyer, that claims that CNN didn't just happen upon Mr. Stone's home right before a 29-person FBI
team raided it and took him into custody based on a "gut instinct," as the FBI claimed. The letter was produced by
Mr. Stone's lawyer, Grant Smith, who sent it to the House and Senate Judiciary Committees. It details a
frightening tale of CNN acting on behalf of the FBI in regard to the continual Russia probe.
Documents
Show CNN Was Tipped Off on Roger Stone Arrest by 29 FBI Armed Agents — Leaked by Deep State!. CNN's
camera crew allegedly arrived at Stone's residence a whole hour before the raid and CNN's Sara Murray provided Stone's
attorney with a draft copy of the indictment in an early morning communique to confirm the FBI raid and arrest. CNN was
the only camera crew on the scene of the FBI raid on Roger Stone's home. While CNN has spent an entire week claiming
their presence at the FBI raid on Stone's South Florida home was a combination of luck and hard work, this evidence proves
that their "source" was indeed the Office of the Special Counsel, who colluded with the notoriously anti-Trump news network
to produce a propaganda broadcast of the arrest that is reminiscent of the Nazi era tactics of the Gestapo and propaganda
ministry lead by Joseph Goebbels.
CNN Segment Tries To
Paint Border Crisis As Hollywood Fiction. CNN reporters compared the southern border crisis to Hollywood
fiction on "New Day" Wednesday [1/30/2019] and played clips from the 2018 film "Sicario: Day of the Soldado" to
illustrate their point. CNN correspondent Miguel Marquez narrated the piece, which intertwined clips of cartel violence
from the film with news headlines and immigration soundbites from President Donald Trump. The chyron read: "Are
Trump's Border Claims Hollywood Fantasy?"
CNN
Hid Images and Video of Roger Stone's 72-Year-Old Wife Being Dragged Out of Home Barefoot and In Nightgown. On
Monday Roger Stone told Judge Napolitano in a FOX Nation interview that his 72-year-old wife was also forced to stand outside
barefoot and in her nightgown. For some strange reason this was not aired on CNN who had a camera crew at Stone's home
during the arrest. The Gateway Pundit wrote CNN for comment — It would be completely irresponsible if they
hid this from the American public.
Jim
Acosta Peddled Slime: 'Team of Vipers' Reveals CNN Printed Unsubstantiated Dirt on Sarah Sanders to Settle Ex-Trump Aide's
Score. An excerpt from former West Wing official Cliff Sims' new book — provided exclusively to
Breitbart News ahead of the book's public release on Monday — shows how CNN's Jim Acosta peddled unsubstantiated
misinformation from a disgruntled ex-Trump campaign aide about White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders as part of
the network's effort to push the Stormy Daniels scandal story. In other words, Sims' book reveals that CNN pushed out
an attack on a current Trump aide by an ex-Trump aide — providing the ex-Trump aide with anonymity to shield the
person's identity — and did not verify whether it was actually true before CNN printed it.
CNN
Got an Inside Tip About the FBI Raid and It's Lying About It. In response to the accusations by President Trump
and others, that CNN had received an inside tip about the Roger Stone raid from the FBI, the news network published a whole
article claiming that it had gotten the scoop by putting together various clues. Nonsense. There was no purpose
to such an aggressive FBI raid without a camera crew standing by. Previous defendants had been allowed to turn
themselves in. Why would it take multiple vehicles and personnel to arrest one man in his sixties? There's
nothing resembling practical necessity here. And, without cameras standing by to broadcast the footage, the entire
effect would have been lost. [...] Occam's Razor tells us that the FBI tipped off CNN. And that needs to be investigated.
Anonymous Twitter Guy
Turns Out To Be Better Reporter Than Jim Acosta. An anonymous Twitter user spent his Friday night [1/11/2019]
absolutely dismembering the border diary of CNN's Jim Acosta. Acosta, for his part, spent Thursday filing short video
diaries from McAllen, Texas. [...] His last video, shot by a portion of the border with no fence, was seemingly a direct
response to President Donald Trump's criticism. As if to make the idea of border security seem like a joke, Acosta
playfully pointed out a shuffleboard court adjacent from the US border. [...] For a Twitter user going by the handle "Techno
Fog," enough was enough. Either Acosta didn't know, or he chose not to say, that the waterfront town he was reporting
from is basically a Border Patrol firm base with a geographically advantageous position.
How
news media omissions distort Russia probe narrative, and shield Democrats. Counterintelligence investigations
are by their very nature complex, nuanced and methodically slow, all facts that today's news media outlets seem to ignore as
they chronicle the Russia collusion probe. The past week provided fresh examples of how journalists endlessly seeking
to portray the Russia probe in black-and-white terms can misinform the public through omission, cherry-picking or lack of
context. On Wednesday [1/9/2019], for example, CNN and others ran speculative reports suggesting Russians or
Republicans could be involved in a mysterious grand jury subpoena fight involving special counsel Robert Mueller.
CNN's
Don Lemon Wants to Delay President's Speech to Censor It. Don Lemon wants a delay in the President's speech so
CNN can censor it — edit, criticize, fake fact-check, morph it, and whatever else he thinks necessary. And
this is why they call CNN fake news. Criticizing the President for calling them fake news seems silly in light of the
fact that Lemon is ready to air fake news. Even Chris Cuomo looked confused and was forced to defend the
President. He said the President has the right to present his case to the American people.
Don
Lemon Suggests There Be an On Air 'Delay' During Trump's Speech. On his program Monday night, CNN's Don Lemon
urged the network to incorporate a "delay" during President Trump's primetime address on border security, such as one you'd
have during a live awards ceremony when Christian Bale or Patricia Arquette step up to the mic with no filter.
Otherwise, it's like their network will be "promoting propaganda" that comes out of Trump's mouth, Lemon feared.
"People will believe it whether the facts are true or not," Lemon said.
The Editor says...
Read that last sentence again. In it, Mr. Lemon summarized the success of CNN.
Here are the
Most Egregious Fake News Stories of 2018. [#2] CNN and The Hill spread retracted sexual assault claim against
Kavanaugh: CNN and The Hill both reported on a sexual assault claim against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh in
late September without ever mentioning that the claim had been quickly retracted. Jeffrey Catalan apologized for making
a "mistake" in leveling the false claim against Kavanaugh, but CNN and The Hill's initial reports on the claim failed to note
the retraction. The Hill later retracted a tweet bolstering the claim and CNN updated its misleading report.
Writer
touted by CNN as 'Journalist of the Year' forced to resign for fabricating stories. The German magazine Der
Spiegel revealed Wednesday that one of its top award-winning journalists fabricated many of his articles, inventing
characters, sources, and their quotes "on a grand scale" for many years. Claas Relotius, a reporter and editor,
admitted to fabricating parts of at least 14 stories following the magazine's internal investigation. The publication
said the issue "marks a low point in the 70-year history of Der Spiegel." "I am sick and I need to get help," he
reportedly told the magazine.
Trump
Provides Example of Google Bias After Being Called a Liar. During Obama's presidency, Google put his State of
The Union addresses on the front page of their site every year, while Trump's have never been featured. Meanwhile, CNN
said Trump propped up a "false claim" that big tech is censoring conservatives and called it a conspiracy.
DHS Shuts
Down Fake News From CNN's Jim Sciutto. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) responded Wednesday after CNN
accused President Donald Trump of making up statistics about illegal immigration. Trump claimed during a meeting with
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer this week that terrorists are illegally
immigrating to the United States. "People are pouring into our country, including terrorists. We caught 10
terrorists over a short period of time," Trump said. CNN anchor Jim Sciutto asserted multiple times that Trump was
incorrect, writing, "DHS did not provide evidence of a single terrorist caught at the southern border over the very last
short period of time as the president claimed."
The Editor says...
The president's claims are not disproven just because the government does not provide evidence to CNN upon demand.
I think the President should not provide CNN with any information at all, since it would likely be used against him later.
CNN
'Fact-Check' on Trump Crushed After DHS Provides Actual Facts on Terrorists. CNN's Jim Sciutto was one of the
many journalists this week who attacked President Trump's comments about border security during his meeting with Nancy Pelosi
and Chuck Schumer Tuesday. Sciutto even did a whole segment "fact-checking" the president on Wednesday's CNN
Newsroom. Unfortunately for him, actual experts from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) called out his
reporting on Twitter with a brutal comeback. The former Obama staffer turned CNN host took to Twitter to brag about his
"fact-check" of Trump's claims about DHS stopping terrorists at the border, dismissing it as fear-mongering.
America's
Trojan Horses Are Sacking Us From Within. The most deceptive Trojan Horse trots around as compassion. By
twisting the meaning of equality, fairness and justice, liberals shame politicians into overspending on social programs,
ignoring federal laws, and giving special rights to "victim" groups. The migrant caravan is the latest victim
group. Carrying the Honduran flag, thousands of migrants stormed the Mexican border headed for America, taunting Trump
along the way. They used women and children as human shields, attacked U.S. Border Patrol, and admitted they're just
looking for a better life. The "caravan" turned out to be a Trojan Horse — unarmed intruders disguised as
asylum seekers. But the rock-throwing didn't stop CNN's Chris Cuomo from trying to disarm us with compassion.
There's
No Terrorism Like Islamic Terrorism, Despite the Left's Lies. Donald Lemon, on CNN: "So, we have to stop
demonizing people and realize the biggest terror threat in this country is white men, most of them radicalized to the
right. And we have to start doing something about them. There is no travel ban on them. There is no ban
on — they had the Muslim ban. There is no white guy ban. So, what do we do about that?" Racist
Donald Lemon chooses to make this a race issue, and yet you never hear him refer to ubiquitous Muslim terrorism by the race
of its perpetrators, as most Muslim terrorists are non-white. Another leftist hack, politician Corey Booker, told CNN
in January, "In American history since 9/11, we've had 85 major attacks in our country, 73 percent of them have been by white
nationalist hate groups." As I noted above, this lying leftist cites the study that conveniently and deviously begins on
9/11, in order to downplay or even exonerate Islamic terrorism, and not even mentioning leftist terrorism, in order to
conveniently make it appear that his political opponents are the most dangerous terrorists around.
Murdered
WaPo 'Reporter' Jamal Khashoggi [was] Connected to Osama bin Laden, Muslim Brotherhood and Russiagate [and] Wasn't Even [a]
US Green Card Holder. Murdered WaPo 'Reporter' Jamal Khashoggi was connected to Osama bin Laden and the Muslim
Brotherhood. It also turns out he may have been related to Russiagate and he wasn't even a US citizen. In
October, CNN criticized reports that Washington Post reporter, Jamal Khashoggi was related to Osama bin Laden. They
said this was all talking points [...] But what CNN doesn't report and what Khashoggi may have neglected to note is that when
Khashoggi was with bin Laden in Afghanistan he was very much in sync with bin Laden, as noted in the Arab Weekly [...]
Acosta
Told Court Under Penalty of Perjury That He 'Politely' Questioned Trump. Jim Acosta, the chief White House
correspondent for CNN, told the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia last week, in a written declaration
delivered under penalty of perjury, that he "politely" questioned President Donald Trump at a November 7 press
conference. Acosta submitted the sworn declaration, which is dated Nov. 13, as part of the lawsuit he and CNN have
brought against President Trump, White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders and other White House officials for revoking his
White House reporter's "hard pass."
Lemon
leads most outrageous assertion, yet: 'ALL pro-Trump white women are racist,' deeply invested in supremacy. An
outrageous discussion unfolded on CNN recently focused on how most white women who voted for President Donald Trump must be
"racist." Only one of the all-female panel hosted by CNN's Don Lemon pushed back in the discussion on why the president
resonates with most white women, delivering a blistering take-down of the argument that white women who have a "deep
investment in white supremacy" voted for Trump. Lemon began by asking liberal contributor Kirsten Powers "why white women
support Donald Trump in spite of or perhaps because of his policies and his tone," during Friday's [11/16/2018] "CNN Tonight."
Post-Midterm Meltdowns. CNN has
sued the president and his entourage for revoking Jim Acosta's White House press pass. This is the perfect illustration of the
presumptuousness of the fake news press. This description "fake news" was furnished by the president when CNN took the Steele dossier
public and asked the president if he had participated in a festival of urination by a group of prostitutes in a Moscow hotel room because
the Obamas had slept there. In those early days of the administration, Wolf Blitzer claimed immense enterprise by CNN to unearth the
dossier (that the Democratic National Committee, which paid for it, was shopping desperately to the media). CNN elaborately portrayed
this now infamous hack-job as the work of an eminent retired British espionage official. After Acosta attempted to filibuster the
president's post-midterm press conference and engage him in debate, the revocation of Acosta's pass was an appropriate measure. CNN
has many other accredited representatives and could nominate a replacement, but the network's media director, Brian Stelter, a
foaming-at-the-mouth Trump-hater, instead has sued the president.
The Evidence Is Overwhelming.
While bloviating and ululating about the illusory and innumerate Great White Terror Threat last week, [CNN's Don] Lemon
stated unequivocally that we needn't be concerned about foreign terrorists: ["]We don't need to worry about
people who are thousands of miles away. The biggest threats are homegrown. The facts prove that.["]
Sure they do — if you start tallying dead bodies on the day AFTER 9/11/2001. But if you count the nearly 3,000
dead bodies stacked up on 9/11, it's not even close. The facts prove that. Then in a startling display of egregious
doublethink, Lemon said in the same sentence that "we have to stop demonizing people" before demonizing white males: [...]
CNN Interview Appears
to Choose 'Random' Rally Goer - Turns Out to be Andrew Gillum's Mom. CNN reporter Randi Kaye was conducting
interviews at a rally for Florida Democratic gubernatorial candidate Andrew Gillum on Friday when she "randomly" interviewed
Gillum's mother. Former President Barack Obama spoke in support of Gillum, who currently serves as the mayor of Tallahassee,
at a Miami, Florida rally on Friday. Gillum is squaring off against Republican Florida Rep. Ron DeSantis.
No, CNN: Nationalism
Is Not White Supremacy. One doesn't know whether to laugh or cry at this. Laugh at the absurdity that the
concept of "nationalism" has anything whatsoever to do with race. Or cry at the realization that yet again, as is true
of the Left throughout American history, the obsession with race is something the liberal media cannot and will not leave in
the ash heap of history where it belongs.
CNN
Attempts to Blame President Trump for Suspicious Packages. No one yet really knows what the motives are behind
mailing packages containing fake pipe-bombs to high-profile members of the Trump 'resistance'. Hopefully the FBI will
identify the perpetrators quickly. However, given the history of left-wing political activity and their use of fake
hate crime as a tool to advance victim politics, the strongest origination likelihood is a person or group connected to
left-wing activism. Toward that suspicion there is growing Alinsky-motive visible amid media. CNN is desperate to
pin the blame on President Trump. Check out the Alinsky model narrative engineering on display today. It starts
out by labeling the recipients as "Trump's targets":
CNN
Anchor Lies About Remarks Made By Trump, Trump Jr. CNN anchor Ana Cabrera falsely claimed on Sunday
[10/14/2018] that President Donald Trump and Donald Trump Jr. made racial remarks over the last week that white men have a
lot to fear. "President Trump and his son Don Jr. said this week white men have a lot to fear right now," Cabrera said
during a segment on black people who have had the police called on them by white people. Trump and Trump Jr. never said
that, though. Earlier this month Trump said it was a "very scary time for young men in America" as he spoke about men
being falsely accused of crimes as it related to the allegations made against then-Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.
CNN
Promotes Misleading Article With Further Misleading Tweet. A CNN headline and the tweet promoting the article
provided a misleading impression about one of the alleged witnesses to the alleged sexual assault on Christine Blasey Ford by
Brett Kavanaugh. The headline on the article read "Christine Blasey Ford's friend is not refuting Ford's allegation,
will cooperate with FBI, lawyer says." Its accompanying tweet read: "Christine Blasey Ford's friend, Leland Ingham
Keyser, is not refuting Ford's allegation against Brett Kavanaugh and will cooperate with the FBI, her lawyer says."
Activist Ken Gardner pointed out the misleading framing in a reply to CNN's tweet: "Hi, CNN, she repeated what she told
the Judiciary Committee: she has no knowledge of the party and had never met Kavanaugh at any event, with or without Ford
present. If this is what you call 'not refuting,' no wonder no one trusts your reporting."
CNN
And The Hill Spread Retracted Sexual Assault Claim — Without Mentioning It Was Retracted. CNN and
The Hill both spread a bombastic accusation of sexual assault against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh on Wednesday,
without mentioning that the man who made the accusation has since retracted the claim and apologized for making it. A
Rhode Island man called Democratic Rhode Island Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse's office and claimed that Kavanaugh and one of
the judge's high school friends, Mark Judge, had drunkenly sexually assaulted a friend of his while in Rhode Island in 1998,
according to the transcript of a Senate Judiciary Committee interview with Kavanaugh. The man's name was redacted in
the transcripts released to the public but the investigator quoted verbatim several outlandish anti-Trump tweets from the
man's Twitter account, allowing reporters to definitively identify him on Twitter as "Jeffrey Catalan."
Yes, the Mainstream
Media Is the Enemy. CNN, for example, "resigned" three journalists, including an executive editor, for their
involvement in a story that relied on an "anonymous source" who had the scoop on a fictitious "Russian investment fund with ties
to Trump officials" and the nonexistent investigation thereof. After the network concluded that "standard editorial processes
were not followed," (read: they were caught misinforming the American people, and caught as the operative) CNN axed the trio,
including Eric Lichtblau, then a CNN new hire but a veteran of the Times and a Pulitzer Prize recipient. It's unclear what
became of that "anonymous source."
Why
is CNN avoiding the truth about Lanny Davis' lies? It all started with last month's bombshell CNN report that
Cohen, Trump's former personal attorney, was claiming his then-boss knew in advance of the 2016 Trump Tower meeting between
campaign officials and a Russian operative. [...] Last week, however, Davis publicly stated that Cohen knew no such thing,
and had never said otherwise. He then 'fessed up to his anonymous claims to the New York and Washington papers,
while still insisting he wasn't a source for the CNN report. It was only this week that he admitted he actually was a
CNN source.
CNN
Lashes Out at President Trump 'We Don't Lie!' In July, CNN rolled out a story using anonymous sources wherein
they reported Michael Cohen claimed Trump knew about the Trump Tower meeting with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya in
advance. Perhaps to cover their bases, CNN also reported Michael Cohen told the Senate Intel Panel last year in a
closed-door interview that he didn't know about the Trump Tower meeting in advance and didn't know whether Trump did
either. This dumpster fire of an article was published just a couple weeks after Cohen hired sewer dweller and Clinton
fixer Lanny Davis to be his lawyer.
CNN
Boldly Decides It No Longer Needs Reliable Sources. On July 27, CNN aired a news story in which it claimed
President Donald Trump had advance knowledge of the meeting at Trump Tower between members of his campaign team and two
Russians working with Fusion GPS. Despite the fact Trump has repeatedly stated that he didn't know about this meeting until
after it had occurred, two anonymous sources assured CNN that former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen personally witnessed the
then-candidate for the presidency being told the details about the forthcoming meeting. The two sources went on to
claim that Cohen wanted to make this assertion to special counsel Robert Mueller. So excited was the mainstream media
by this anonymously sourced story that it dominated the headlines for days. Trump was caught now! Soon, Mueller
would have Cohen under oath before a grand jury, and then Trump's collusion with the two Russians at the Trump Tower meeting,
Natalia Veselnitskaya and Rinat Akhmetshin, would be fully exposed! Never mind the fact that by this point, it's been
revealed these two Russian lobbyists were affiliated with Fusion GPS, the same research firm that produced the Steele
dossier, which had sent them to this meeting to lobby Trump's team against the Magnitsky Act sanctions.
Another
Very Fake News Scandal Engulfs CNN with Fake Michael Cohen Russia Story. Another very fake news scandal has
engulfed CNN as the network's credibility crisis reaches another fever pitch just over a year after three senior network
staffers were forced to resign in disgrace over a similar scandal. This time, though, famed Watergate reporter Carl
Bernstein is at the center of the scandal, and the network for now is dug in despite deep criticism from across the political
and ideological spectrum as far-ranging as Breitbart News and Daily Caller among others on one side, and the Associated
Press, Washington Post, BuzzFeed, and more on the other.
If You Want
To Know Why Conservatives Don't Trust Media, Watch CNN. On July 27, CNN reported that Donald Trump's
personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, would be willing to tell Special Counsel Robert Mueller that the president knew in advance of
the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting between his campaign and a Kremlin-linked lawyer who was allegedly selling dirt on Hillary
Clinton. [...] Well, on Monday [89/27/2018] BuzzFeed ran another article in which Davis admitted to being CNN's source as
well, even though the network had initially claimed that Davis had declined to comment for the article — which
turns out not only to be untrue but a ham-fisted way to hide the story's origin. "We stand by our story, and are
confident in our reporting of it," the network responded.
CNN's
Jeffrey Toobin Falsely Blames Antifa Violence on Black Americans. CNN senior legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin
bizarrely pinned the blame for Antifa violence on black Americans Tuesday night [8/28/2018], saying that the far-left group
is "widely perceived as an African-American organization." In response to President Trump warning of Antifa violence
should Democrats win the midterms, Jeffrey Toobin said, "Let's be clear also about what's going on here. The theme here
is, 'I'm Donald Trump and I'll protect you from the scary black people.'" "Antifa is widely perceived as an African-American
organization, and this is just part of the same story of LeBron James and Don Lemon and Maxine Waters and the NFL players and
the UCLA basketball players," he continued.
CNN's
Jim Sciutto Busted for Two Fake News Scoops in One Week. CNN's Jim Sciutto has had two big scoops debunked as
very fake news in just one week. Sciutto, CNN's chief national security correspondent, joined the far-left network
after serving in Barack Obama's White House for a few years. His bias and dishonesty has made already him a
laughingstock on more than one occasion, but this was an especially bad week for the anti-Trump activist. Last week,
Sciutto misled the public with a breathless piece of "breaking news" that falsely claimed President Trump did not consult
with Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats prior to revoking the security clearance of John Brennan, the former CIA
chief who, like Sciutto, served in the Obama administration.
The
left's enforcers: CNN sues to reveal names and addresses of Manafort jurors. Less than a week after
making a stink about freedom of the press, President Trump, and "enemies of the people," CNN and apparently other news
outlets have decided to get into the harassment business, given that reporting news is just not good enough for them. [...] So
now they've gotten into the jury-tampering business. They're more interested in who the jury is than the trial itself.
CNN's
Cuomo Says Antifa's Fight Is Moral Even After They Attack Cops, Reporters. CNN's Chris Cuomo suggested on
Monday night that violence carried out by Antifa is not as bad as violence committed by racists because Antifa's cause is
moral and just — even after they attacked police and reporters over the weekend at the "Unite the Right" rally in
Washington, D.C. The segment came after a couple of dozen racists came out in support of the "Unite the Right" rally and
were met by a large gathering of Antifa thugs who ended up attacking reporters and police officers. Cuomo downplayed
Antifa's violence by saying they only "confronted" police and "berated" journalists.
CNN
Caught Putting Socialist on Panel to Pretend He's a Disillusioned Trump Voter. CNN is a sorry excuse for a news
network. They push fake news every day but their latest venture is beyond the pale. The New Day hosts and panel in
the video are outrageous liars. CNN should call themselves the Goebbels network. What you are about to see in the
video is unadulterated propaganda. It's incredible, it really is. They put so-called Trump voters on a panel and
one plant, who claimed to be a disillusioned Trump voter turned hater, is a Socialist. He has always hated President
Trump. [Video clip]
CNN
Op-Ed slammed for comparing military to the media, says both are 'protecting our freedoms'. CNN has been mocked
widely for publishing an opinion piece calling for Americans to thank the media the way members of the military are
acknowledged because they are both "protecting our freedoms" and "the stakes have never been higher." University of Notre
Dame management professor Joseph Holt wrote the essay headlined, "The press isn't the enemy, it's the protector," which was
published last week. The ridiculed piece is labeled "opinion" and notes "the views expressed here are solely the author's."
CNN
Jokes About Obvious Truth: US Media Works With Intelligence Community. As CNN reporter, Gary Tuchman,
mocked supporters of Donald Trump who displayed signs supporting the internet "Q-Anon" movement, he blatantly misrepresented
a well-established fact. Tuchman taunted one Trump supporter who said mainstream media was 'weaponized by the CIA'
saying: "I don't know anyone in the CIA except for a few people I've interviewed over the years? But weaponized
by the CIA? What does that even mean? ... Do you think I'm weaponized by the CIA?" The truth is that mainstream media does
indeed have a relationship with intelligence agencies, and the US government works very hard to control and cooperate with
the mainstream media to achieve its goals.
Now they see themselves
as soldiers. Yesterday [8/6/2018], CNN had the audacity to publish an "opinion" piece by an ethics professor from Notre
Dame that compares "journalists" to soldiers. [...] It must be "journalistic ethics" that inspired Politico reporter Marc
Caputo to call us gap-toothed garbage people. "Accuracy and fairness?" Like cutting video to make it look like Trump
emptying a box of fish food was some kind of never-before-seen boorishness the likes of which the world has ever known?
Was it that "demanding code of journalistic ethics" that inspired Chris Cillizza to put a rifle scope on a gif of President
Trump? Sleeping with a Senate staffer to get classified information — talk about a demanding code of
journalistic ethics. How many retractions and corrections have the news media had to make over the last two years?
CNN
Claims To Support The First Amendment. Anyone who watches CNN for longer than five minutes will most likely
hear the network complaining about President Donald Trump's "attacks" on the media, labeling him as a threat to free speech
and "our Democracy." But does CNN really support the First Amendment? Hardly. CNN regularly engages in seeking
to silence those who criticize their network or those who offer facts that counter the narrative of the Democratic Party.
Hey Media, You Started It.
New York Times publisher A.G. Sulzberger says he told Trump his anti-press rhetoric could lead to violence. But the media's
anti-Trump rhetoric already has led to violence: public officials rat-packed and bullied, Trump supporters harassed, White
House spokes-lady Sarah Sanders having to live under guard. And yet when Sanders pointed this out to Look-At-Me-I'm-Jim Acosta,
Acosta stormed out of the room. [Indeed], if he doesn't want to hear the truth, he could just stay home and watch CNN.
CNN's
Acosta Makes Absurd Claim About Trump Rally After Getting Criticized. CNN's Jim Acosta complained on Wednesday evening
[8/1/2018] about the way he was treated yesterday during President Donald Trump's rally in Tampa, Florida, claiming that he felt
like he "wasn't in America anymore." Appearing on HLN with host S.E. Cupp, Acosta recounted his experience at the recent
Trump rally where he was mocked and Trump supporters chanted "CNN S---s!" while he was on camera. "Honestly, it felt like we
weren't in America anymore," Acosta said. "I don't know how to put it any more plainly than that."
CNN:
The OPPO Research Arm Of The Democratic Party. Everyone knows that CNN is maniacally devoted, 24/7, to trying
to destroy the Trump administration. But it doesn't end there. CNN is all in for the Democratic Party, and is
doing its part to help the Dems capture the House in November. See, e.g., the KFile, billed by CNN as "the leading
investigation team for the social, mobile generation." KFile features content by Andrew Kaczynski, pretty much all of which
consists of anti-GOP smears. Kaczynski came to CNN via Buzzfeed, which you should keep in mind next time someone tells
you that CNN represents legitimate journalism. Kaczynski has a vendetta against my Congressman Jason Lewis, who
represents Minnesota's 2nd District. The 2nd is a swing district that the Democrats hope to capture this year; hence
Kaczynski's interest.
CNN:
Revoking Security Clearance of James Clapper Is 'National Security Threat!' How exactly is it a "national
security threat" to revoke security clearance of someone who no longer works for the government, but now works as an analyst
for CNN? Finally taking away security clearance from him, as well as from John Brennan, who now works for MSNBC, James
Comey and others who worked for Obama makes perfect sense.
The
World Throws An Anti-Trump Protest At NATO, Hardly Anybody Shows Up. Here's how CNN saw President Trump's first
day at the big NATO summit in Brussels, Belgium: "Trump outrages on the world stage, again." In something called
"The Point," CNN said: "Trump's comments at the NATO summit seemingly further alienated the United States from its
allies. And this is only day one of his foreign trip." The piece also quoted former Secretary of State John Kerry
saying, "The President set America back this morning. He is steadily destroying our reputation in the world."
That's the take of the mainstream media in America. It's the exact same take the MSM had when George W. Bush was
president. Bush, to them, was a bumbling fool stomping over the world stage with his "cowboy diplomacy." But Barack
Obama, he — The Chosen One — would make the world love America again.
Brian
Stelter skewered after bragging CNN skipped Trump rally. CNN's in-house media magpie Brian Stelter was
ridiculed Wednesday night [6/20/2018] after bragging on Twitter that his network didn't air President Trump's rally in
Duluth, Minn. which occurred hours after he signed an executive order to end the separation of families who cross the border
illegally. [...] The CNN media reporter was, as the kids say, "ratioed," which is when negative comments far outnumber the
likes and retweets on a particular tweet.
Sarah
Sanders to CNN Reporter: You And Your Network Falsely Accused Me of Not Wanting to Be Here. White House Press Secretary
Sarah Huckabee Sanders aimed fire at CNN Senior White House correspondent Jeff Zeleny Monday [6/18/2018] for CNN claiming that Sanders
did not want to do the briefing that day. Sanders was referencing a tweet from CNN's media reporter Oliver Darcy, who tweeted that
Zeleny learned from a White House official alleged Sanders did not want to do the briefing amid questions on the Trump administration's
child separation policy.
Feinstein:
'I Didn't Really Know Enough' About Mistreatment of Undocumented Immigrants During Obama Years. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D., Calif.)
said Sunday [6/10/2018] that while former President Barack Obama was in office, she was not well enough aware of the mistreatment undocumented immigrants
faced, saying she has since learned more about the issue. CNN's Jake Tapper mentioned to Feinstein a recent viral photo of undocumented children
in a holding cell that was tweeted out by former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa (D.). The photo was shared by many who attempted to condemn
the Trump administration's actions at the southern U.S. border. The issue with the photo going viral for that reason is it was taken in 2014 while
Obama was in office.
CNN
White House Producer Calls Out CNN Contributor for False Tweet. American Urban Radio White House correspondent
April Ryan tweeted a misleading comment about President Donald Trump's celebration of America this afternoon at the White
House. Trump held the event in place of the Eagles Super Bowl celebration, which was hastily canceled after only a
handful of Eagles players decided to attend. Ryan, a CNN contributor, tweeted out that as Trump began speaking at the
event, the crowd "heckled and booed" him and that reporters have "confirmed" this.
Very
Fake News: CNN's Stelter Lies About Melania Trump 'Disappearing'. Following a surgical procedure on May 14,
less than three weeks ago, the first lady has, understandably, not made any public appearances (she is scheduled to host some Gold
Star families at the White House Monday night [6/4/2018]). But this is not what the far-left [Brian] Stelter told his
audience. Instead, the anti-Trump activist repeatedly and deliberately misinformed his audience with the false claim she has
been "invisible." Stelter also allowed one of his guests to repeat the false claim the first lady has "disappeared."
This is simply not true.
Possibly related: CNN's
May Ratings Are In; They're Almost Too Pathetic To Believe. CNN's endless pursuit of being the most anti-Trump
cable news network is having backfiring consequences. According to Ad Week, CNN didn't have a single show in the top 25
throughout the entire month of May. Worse than that, the fake news network didn't have a program that averaged at least
900,000 total viewers. As Fox News climbed in the ratings, CNN collapsed.
CNN's
Ratings Collapse Marches into June. Far-left cable channel CNN suffered a massive ratings collapse in
May. June is shaping up to be worse. CNN stumbled out of May with a massive -25 percent ratings collapse when
compared to the same month last year. Because Fox News actually experienced total viewer growth and MSNBC's loss was a
negligible two percent, we know the problem is CNN and not the news cycle or Americans tiring of the news.
Fake
News: CNN's April Ryan Falsely Reports Trump Booed at 'Celebration for America'. CNN political analyst
April Ryan sent social media into a frenzy after posting a false secondhand report that President Donald Trump was booed
during the White House's "Celebration for America" event Tuesday [6/5/2018]. As President Trump began his remarks, a man
shouted, "stop hiding behind the armed services and the national anthem." The heckler was met with loud boos from
attendees and was reportedly escorted from the premises.
The Spying That Dare
Not Speak Its Name. The media's pooh-poohing coverage of Spygate grows more laughable by the day.
Turn on CNN at almost any hour and you will see its farcical re-education camp in session — this or that host
yelling louder and louder that no one "spied" on the Trump campaign. As stupid as this coverage is, it is
still worth dissecting, if only for its propagandistic shadings, telling omissions, and inadvertent revelations.
It is as if the media has an emergency manual at the ready in the event that a story starts hurting the
Democrats, a manual which enjoins reporters to run away from it as fast as they can. But if that's not possible,
if they have to shelter in place, they are instructed to minimize the story and urge the public to avert its gaze
from it.
This is only slightly off-topic: The
Astonishing Silliness of CNN. [Scroll down] Over the course of two airports, CNN was everywhere.
Before departure, CNN was rolling in our lunch restaurant. Next door, CNN was burbling in a convenience store. In
the second airport, in the waiting area at the gate, CNN was not only surrounding me on several screens, but the sound was
also piped in. [...] Join with me, America, and demand the channel be changed. Or even better, to turn the TVs
completely off, with the exception of major sporting events and occasional soothing nature specials.
The
media's collusion delusion is collapsing. CNN"s Brian Stelter has been a loyal member of the media's Praetorian
Guard for ages, and he shows no signs of turning. In his newsletter last night, Stelter devoted the majority of his
writing to fighting back against recent revelations that the Justice Department used an informant to investigate spy on the
Trump campaign in 2016. The piece is clearly Stelter trying to weave a narrative. When called out on that
narrative-weaving, mainly using the phrase "far-right bloggers," Stelter leapt into his standard defense mode. You see,
HE wasn't saying it was "far-right bloggers;" someone else did and he just quoted that phrase from someone else. [...] Sure,
Brian. Your entire body of work since 2016 shows that you are clearly on a side of the aisle. You've been a
protector of your side of the aisle interests. You call people conspiracy theorists when they put together information
that the media has dribbled out piecemeal. Then, when you are proven to be wrong, you can't man up and say that you're wrong.
The Definitive List
Of Media Screw-Ups On The Trump-Russia Story. [#1] CNN Accuses Don Jr. Of Wikileaks Collusion: Last December,
CNN's Manu Raju reported that Wikileaks emailed Donald Trump Jr. to give him access to stolen documents a full ten days before
they were released to the public. Unfortunately for CNN, it turns out their sources gave them the wrong date.
Don Jr. actually received an email with access to the stolen docs on Sept. 14, 2016, after they had already been
released publicly.
This
Is CNN: Hiring of Suspected Leaker Clapper Raises Ethical Questions. CNN walked away with a prestigious
journalism award at Saturday night's [4/28/2018] White House Correspondent's Association dinner for their role in making
public a briefing by intelligence officials to then President-elect Donald Trump. CNN reported the briefing "included
allegations that Russian operatives claim to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump."
But the information briefed to the President was also leaked to the media by one of the same senior Obama administration
officials who orchestrated the briefing and was hired by CNN months later as a paid analyst. Some are questioning now
if this was ethical — a pay for play of sorts — as it raises serious questions about the role and
responsibility that U.S. intelligence officials have when taking on paid positions as analysts for news organizations, while
still retaining their high-level security clearances. It also raises similar questions about news organizations and
their role of remaining objective and not paying their sources.
CNN
Panel Gives Their Opinions About Why Opinion Shows Are Bad. In a jaw-dropping display that was one part a lack
of self-awareness and another part hypocrisy, Wednesday's [4/18/2018] prime-time Anderson Cooper 360 featured a panel
of CNN analysts sharing their opinions about opinion shows like Hannity on Fox News. Their opinions varied but
were largely against the mixing of opinion and news. And that was their opinion on the news of the day. The
hypocrisy was so thick you could cut it with a knife. "I mean, personally, I have no problem with Fox News. I'm
glad Fox News is out there. I'm glad MSNBC is out there. I personally wouldn't want to do what either of them
do," explained host Anderson Cooper.
CNN's
sexist coverage of YouTube shooter pushes half-baked 'love triangle' narrative. YouTube shooter Nasim Aghdam
was a scorned woman who opened fire at the company's headquarters because she was spurned in a "love triangle." That's
the narrative CNN is pushing, to the annoyance of viewers, who called the half-baked theory sexist, misogynistic "fake news."[4/4/2018]
CNN's crime and justice reporter Shimon Prokupecz floated the "love triangle" theory to Wolf Blitzer, when he blurted out that the
shooting stemmed from "perhaps a love triangle." Prokupecz did not provide any evidence to back[4/4/2018]up his claims, but
the panel continued to speculate that the shooting was due to a romantic relationship gone wrong.
CNN
mocked for glorifying JFKs 'legendary' infidelity after harping on sex allegations against Trump. CNN was
slammed for hypocrisy over the weekend when the network glorified President John F. Kennedy's many infidelities after
spending significant coverage painting President Trump as a monster for an alleged affair that occurred prior to his
political career. While promoting "The Kennedys," CNN hailed the 35th president's "legendary love life," before asking,
"Did one of his affairs connect him with the mob?" The tweet featured video detailing JFK's relationship with actress Judy
Campbell, who was allegedly intimate with the head of the Chicago mafia while also having an affair with the president.
No
One Is Saying That. Did you hear? They're talking about repealing the Second Amendment. It started with former
Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens and George Washington University Law Professor Jonathan Turley. And it sure does seem like
those calls prompted skeptics of American gun culture to echo their remarks. Turley and Stevens were joined this week by op-ed
writers in the pages of Esquire and the Seattle Times. Democratic candidates for federal office have even enlisted
in the ranks of those calling for an amendment to curtail the freedoms in the Bill of Rights. Of course, this is just the most
mainstream invocation of anti-Second Amendment themes that have been expressed unashamedly for years, from liberal activists like
Michael Moore to conservative opinion writers at the New York Times. [...] You might be surprised to learn that none of this
occurred. It's only your vivid or, some might go so far as to say, fevered imagination. Rest assured, CNN host Chris Cuomo
insists that "no one" is calling for the repeal of the Second Amendment. And even if they are, as Justice Stevens most
certainly is, he's a "boogeyman" who commands no influence or respect.
CNN's
Stelter Admits He Let David Hogg Get Away With Lies About Guns, NRA. It's not often that CNN media reporter
Brian Stelter is honest about his blatant biases when it comes to politics, just take his assertions about the President's
mental fitness and his denials of making such connections. But during an appearance on the Monday edition of HLN's
S.E. Cupp Unfiltered, the Reliable Sources host appeared to let it slip that he let radical anti-gun activist
David Hogg get away with making false claims about the guns and the NRA during a February 25 interview on his show.
Stelter's admission came after host S.E. Cupp questioned him about the wisdom of the media's obsession with elevating only
the kids pushing gun control.
CNN
In Full Meltdown Over Zinke Allegedly Favoring 'Excellence' Over 'Diversity'. Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke is
taking heat for allegedly telling staffers he would focus on "excellence" and finding the "best people" to work at the
department, not "diversity." Zinke's lack of concern over "diversity" at the Interior Department angered some staffers,
who rushed to tell CNN. The news network on Monday [3/26/2018] ran with the chyron: "Zinke angers many by saying
it's more important to find best people; Dept denies." Each time Zinke was asked about diversity, he would respond, "what's
important is having the right person for the right job," or "I care about excellence, and I'm going to get the best people,
and you'll find we have the most diverse group anyone's ever had," sources told CNN. Zinke's spokeswoman denied he made
those comments, telling CNN "the anonymous claims made against the secretary are untrue."
CNN Runs Story Comparing
ICE Agents To Nazis. The full article tells the story of a Jewish woman who is hiding a Catholic, Latino family
from deportation by Immigration and Customs Enforcement. "For the woman, the link from the present to the history of
World War II is strong," the authors write, noting that Jewish people also feared being kicked out of their homes during the
Holocaust. The article apparently does not feel the need to point out the key differences between Jewish people during
the Holocaust and illegal immigrants in the U.S. — chiefly that Jewish people were being exterminated by their own
government. A number of people lashed out at CNN for the offensive comparison.
At the Box Office and
Voting Booth, Leftist Fantasies Bomb. [Scroll down] And then, there's CNN. The cable news outlet has spent the
last fourteen months and more giving 24/7 coverage to a Russia-Trump conspiracy for which there is zero evidence, an epidemic of gun
violence that does not exist, and what Brian Stelter, in a panic attack reminiscent of the little girl in Frobenius's anecdote, recently
called "a rolling, ongoing, crisis" at the White House. The result? Like the Oscars, CNN's ratings have tanked.
Parkland
Shooting: Questions the Left Can't Answer. Days after the shooting, CNN hosted a town hall meeting.
Rather than a thoughtful discussion regarding causes and potential solutions, it lived up to CNN's goal of a political
rally. Yet CNN claims that its meeting was not political. Could CNN pour a cup of coffee without it being
political? Did CNN stack the audience and prep participants? CNN has a history of planting Democrats in its town
hall meetings. One participant claimed that CNN gave him scripted questions to ask. Plausible? Isn't CNN
the network that supplied Hillary Clinton with debate questions in advance? CNN turned their town hall meeting into a
Dana Loesch- and Marco Rubio-bashing fest.
CNN's
Don Lemon apologizes for false criticism of Fox News. One of CNN's top anchors partook this week in the press'
favorite new game of sniggering at Fox News' programming decisions. The problem here is that Don Lemon's exact claim,
that Fox ignored news of White House communications director Hope Hick's looming resignation when it was first reported, is
totally false. Fox not only covered the Hick's news as soon as it was reported Wednesday afternoon, but the right-leaning
cable news network also covered it every hour for the rest of the day. "I said something last night that was an attempt to make
a broader point about Fox News and how they downplay bad news about the administration," Lemon said Thursday evening [3/1/2018].
Florida Shooter Survivor's
Father: CNN Sought Out Political Statements for Interview. CNN has turned a number of the survivors of
the Parkland school shooting in Florida into mini-celebrities in the wake of the massacre. It is seldom the case that
survivors of these tragedies do speak out, so you can't blame the network for giving them airtime. But we can blame CNN
for using these survivors of a tragedy as pawns for gun control. While we don't mean to attack the students personally,
having survived such a tragedy doesn't add any validity to their calls for gun control, especially since I haven't seen any
actual concrete proposals from these students. I've just seen them call for "action." What kind of action exactly?
Who knows — just "action." They also want politicians to "do something." What that something is isn't
explained. Likewise, views of the Parkland survivors who don't believe gun control is the answer aren't any more valid
either, but they do exist, and CNN is not giving them airtime. In fact, the only time CNN almost gave one of the pro-gun
students a platform was at their recent town-hall event with Dana Loesch. In that case, they wouldn't allow him to express
his actual beliefs.
5 Other Times CNN Was Accused of Staging
Something. Anybody who watched CNN's town-hall meeting on gun control could easily tell the entire affair was
designed to push a certain agenda. The crowd was stacked and the viewpoint was singular in nature — ban all
the guns! The questions may have also been stacked. Colton Haab, a member of the Junior ROTC credited with shielding
students during the Parkland, Florida, school shooting, accused CNN of scripting questions for students. Haab even went
so far as to name the producer who told him to "stick to the script." "Originally, I had thought that it was going
to be more of my own question and my own say. And then it turned out to be more of just a script," he said. "And
[the producer] had actually said that over the phone, that I needed to stick to the script."
Second
person accuses CNN of trying to direct the narrative at gun town hall. The father of a survivor of last week's
school shooting in Parkland, Fla., said Thursday night [2/22/2018] that a CNN producer "insinuated" to him that the network was looking
for people to interview that would "espouse a certain narrative." Andrew Klein, whose daughter survived the school shooting,
told Laura Ingraham on Fox News Thursday that he spoke to a CNN producer the day after the shooting, Feb. 15., and he took
away from the conversation that they wanted to interview people that wanted to talk about the "policy implications of what
happened in terms of preventing future mass shootings."
CNN
Pimps Traumatized Kids To Push Politics. Conservatives Should Boycott The Network. Adults who prostitute
traumatized teenagers to advance their political agenda should be ashamed of themselves, and those at CNN who do it should be
fired. [...] Conservatives should be undeterred by this trick, rendered all the more transparent by a Marjory Stoneman Douglas
High School student enrolled in the ROTC program, Colton Haab, who alleges that CNN told him to read a scripted question during
their slanderous broadcast. CNN is now calling that student a liar — because we must listen to the children except
when what the children say is inconvenient for CNN. Without falling into Democrats' trap and stooping to attack the
ignorant teenagers themselves, conservatives should aim their criticism squarely at the craven adults who exploit them.
CNN so desperately seeks to manipulate its audience's emotions because the facts uniformly refute its gun-grabbing agenda.
Schoolboy Cameron Kasky.
The U.S. media apparatus — specifically for current events, CNN and Jake Tapper's narrative engineers — consistently
indoctrinate and manipulate children. Indeed, in the history of Fabian political advancement children have always been a focus
point for advancing their authoritarian control objectives. However, today — as with prior history, the media's
ideological lust intoxicates them, and the engineers have a tendency to go too far.
CNN
Scrambles: Denies 'Scripted Question,' Invites Pro-Gun Student to Appear. CNN issued a statement Thursday
morning denying that it had asked a shooting survivor to ask a "scripted question" at the CNN Town Hall on guns on Wednesday
evening [2/21/2018] in Sunrise, Florida. On Wednesday evening, junior Colton Haab, a survivor of last week's mass shooting at
Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, told local Fort Lauderdale ABC affiliate WPLG that CNN had invited him
to appear at the town hall, but he had withdrawn after being asked to recite a "scripted" question.
CNN's
Drew Griffin: School Shooting Survivor Colton Haab Is Lying. CNN's Drew Griffin explicitly accused school
shooting survivor Colton Haab of lying over the student's claim that CNN wrote a question for him to recite at the far-left
network's widely criticized anti-gun town hall. On Thursday evening, President Trump tweeted out criticism of CNN's
ongoing fake news crisis with a quote from Fox News's Tucker Carlson, who interviewed Haab Thursday night. "'School
shooting survivor says he quit @CNN Town Hall after refusing scripted question.' @TuckerCarlson," Trump tweeted, adding,
"Just like so much of CNN, Fake News. That's why their ratings are so bad! MSNBC may be worse."
Colton Haab vs.
CNN. On Wednesday night CNN took up the 2018 children's crusade that is intended to produce gun control where
previously there has only been left-wing frustration. After the event, RealClear Politics posted local television video
of Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School student Colton Haab. [...] Haab said he had been approached by CNN to ask a question
at the event but decided not to after the network gave him a "scripted question" in lieu of one he wrote himself.
Yesterday morning [2/22/2018] CNN issued a statement to the effect "that it did not, and does not, script any questions for
town hall meetings, ever." I was surprised to see CNN disputing one of the youngsters possessing absolute moral authority,
but Haab lost his immunity somewhere along the way. Last night Tucker Carlson followed up with young Mr. Haab on
FOX News. RealClearPolitics has posted an account of the interview together with the video here. I have embedded
the video below. Haab names a CNN name and supplies credible details supporting his claim. He held in his hand
the question he says CNN wrote for him.
CNN's
Pro-Gun Control 'Children's Crusade' Exploited Grieving Students And Parents. It's bad enough that the students
of Marjorie Stoneman Douglas High School have been traumatized by the mass shooting by a former student that claimed 17
lives. But gun control extremists in the media, Hollywood and Democratic Party now are exploiting them to achieve their
dubious agenda of eliminating the Second Amendment.
CNN
busted trying to put scripted words in mouth of hero Stoneman Douglas student at televised town hall. CNN would
be the object of humor if its behavior were not so contemptible. Coming in the wake of its disgrace over using chyrons
to proclaim President Trump a liar, giving up all pretense of objectivity, the latest scandal reveals an active propaganda
effort to manufacture fake questions from real children, even from a boy hero who used his body to protect others during the
shooting at Marjory Douglas Stoneman High School. The narrative favoring the Democrats takes precedence over anything
faintly resembling genuine discussion of the real views of the people who were victims of the shooting.
Shooting
Survivor: CNN Gave Me "Scripted Question" After Denying Question About Armed Guards. Marjory Stoneman
Douglas High School student Colton Haab said he was approached by CNN to ask a question at Wednesday night's town hall but
decided not to after the network gave him a "scripted question," quashing one he wrote himself. Haab, a member of the
Junior ROTC shielded students while the school was under attack from the shooter, said he was going to ask about using
veterans as armed security guards. "CNN had originally asked me to write a speech and questions and it ended up
being all scripted," Haab told WPLG-TV.
CNN's Chris Cuomo Caught Promoting
Fake News Story About Buying AR-15 Without ID. CNN reporter Chris Cuomo was caught sharing a 'fake news' story
about a 20-year-old who was allegedly "able to buy an AR-15 in five minutes" without a valid driver's license. Problem
being, it never happened, and the author of the post, Cody Davis, even admits to it within the body of the story. Oh,
there's no doubt he's trying to convince you that he could have walked out of the store with an AR-15 in five minutes,
but there's also no doubt that he definitively did not buy the gun. In fact, he didn't even fill out the
paperwork for the background check.
CNN
resorts to its usual fake news hackery on Florida gun laws. In some areas, such as Chicago, Detroit, Baltimore,
California, New Jerse and New York, there are are draconian gun restrictions. Heavily burdensome. Yet,
interestingly, there are a lot of crimes that occur there that involve the use of guns.
Ted Cruz Did
A 15 Minute Interview With CNN — They Aired None Of It, Then Attacked Him For Not Coming On-Air. CNN
was very upset that Republicans were not coming on their programming in the wake of the school shooting tragedy this week.
On Wednesday, a gunman opened fire at Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, killing 17. Brian Stelter —
CNN's human-egg hybrid — personally whined that GOP congressmen were "scared" to come on their programming after the
tragedy. "What are they afraid of?" a CNN graphic flashed on "New Day."
Ted
Cruz destroys CNN's sanctimonious Brian Stelter. When tragedy strikes you can count on CNN's media critic/cheerleader
Brian Stelter to make it all about him and his network. The morning after the horrific school shooting in Parkland, Florida,
Stelter decided to call out three Republican politicians that he and his network claimed were "afraid of" appearing on CNN.
Cruz was included in the graphic and shot back fiercely. Stelter was left looking like a fool.
Ted
Cruz Just Blew Open CNN's Blatant Lie About Him Being Too Scared To Give An Interview AGAIN. Yesterday,
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) completely clowned CNN for their claim that he's too chicken to come on their network to discuss
the Parkland shooting by showing them that he's demonstrated multiple times that he's not. "Gosh," said Cruz to CNN, "I
seem to recall doing not 1, not 2, but THREE town hall debates w/[Bernie Sanders] on [CNN] Each 90 min long. You can
accuse me of many things, but being afraid of CNN is not one of them...." Regardless, CNN is continuing the narrative
that Cruz is too scared to appear on the network to discuss the hard issues. Whether this is to give off the impression
that Cruz is too afraid to discuss gun control because the Parkland shooting makes him wrong about his stances, that CNN is a
legitimate news network that Republicans are afraid of, or both, is anyone's guess.
CNN
hires Comey fanboy to "defend" FBI. Scott [Johnson] says James Comey may be the least self-aware man in America.
I agree. Comey is a legend in his own mind. Comey is also a legend in the mind of Josh Campbell, his former special
assistant at the FBI. In an op-ed for USA Today, Campbell called his former boss "a giant of a man with an even bigger heart,
whose focus was always on trying to understand and improve the lives of others." Campbell also wrote an op-ed for the New York
Times in which he stated he was leaving the FBI because of "relentless attacks on the bureau." Campbell claimed that these
attacks "undermine not just America's premier law enforcement agency but also the nation's security." Thus, he said, he "was
reluctantly turning in my badge and leaving an organization I love." (If the ability of a GS-13 FBI employee to get an op-ed
published in the New York Times strikes you as odd, you are not alone. It struck retired FBI supervisory special agent James
Gagliano that way too). CNN immediately hired Campbell as its "law enforcement analyst," a gig he no doubt had lined up
before he wrote his sanctimonious New York Times piece.
Jim
Acosta Spreads Fake News, Tries to Correct It Unobserved. Embattled, anti-Trump CNN reporter Jim Acosta went
and contradicted his own previous reporting on Andrew McCabe Monday [1/29/2018]. Reports came out across various news
organizations that FBI deputy director McCabe was stepping down from his position, months ahead of his planned exit.
CNN's
Jim Acosta Spreads FAKE News About McCabe Stepping Down As FBI Deputy Director. [Scroll down] Rather than
issue a correction, Acosta quoted tweeted himself, attempting to make it seem as though his primary tweet was half of the
story. Acosta was swiftly busted. "'More' is an odd way to spell 'correction,'" tweeted the Washington Free Beacon's
Alex Griswold.
CNN
Democrat Bought Hundreds Of Thousands Of Fake Twitter Followers. Did you know it's possible to buy Twitter
followers to make yourself look more important? There are companies which actually provide this service for a fee.
And it turns out Hilary Rosen, a Democrat consultant who frequently appears on CNN was a customer for one of them.
CNN's
Hilary Rosen Shows She Might Just Be A Lot Dumber Than You Ever Imagined. Life can come at you pretty hard when
you are a shameless hypocrite. Yesterday [1/27/2018], "Democrat strategist" and CNN contributor Hilary Rosen was
slagging on President' Donald Trump's twitter account. [...] The fact is that when you have several million followers you
really can't police them unless you hire staff to do it. People follow you for all kinds of reasons. Some are
your fans. Some hate you and are documenting everything you say. You can't keep bots from following you and you
can't keep bots from retweeting you. Not only is it time consuming it doesn't matter. But there is a big
difference between having bots follow you and this: [...]
CNN Has 'Lost It'. I'm starting
to worry about CNN's "mental fitness." [...] They repeat themselves with "alarming frequency." Just try to turn on CNN
and not see the word "Russia" on the screen. That has been CNN's coverage, since Thursday [1/11/2018]. Clearly CNN
has to devote hours upon hours to its favorite kind of story: the "too good to check" kind. Like MSNBC's
Katy Tur says, "It feels true."
Oops, CNN did it again.
CNN on Monday [12/11/2017] walked back an "exposé" on Attorney General Jeff Sessions that turns out to have exposed
nothing, except maybe the network's own bias. The original report back in May blared that Sessions hadn't listed those
two meetings with Russia's ambassador on his FBI disclosure forms prior to his Senate confirmation hearings. Now CNN
admits that the FBI told Sessions not to list any of his dozens of meetings with other countries' diplomats as part of his
senatorial duties. To be fair, the May story did note the Sessions camp's claims about the FBI's guidelines. But
it also quoted a Beltway "expert" as saying that Sessions should've listed every meeting anyway. What forced CNN to
"clarify"? A right-wing group's Freedom of Information request produced an FBI e-mail from March that proved Sessions right.
CNN
Walks Back Jeff Sessions-Russia Bombshell. CNN has quietly walked back more of their "bombshell" reporting on
the Trump-Russia collusion narrative, and this time it's a story relating to Attorney General Jeff Sessions' security
clearance forms. In May, CNN reported that Sessions had failed to disclose meetings he had with the Russian ambassador
when he was a senator. Justice Department officials told CNN that Sessions had not listed those meetings on a security
clearance form, even though the form says to list "any contact" with the "foreign government" or its "representatives" in the
past seven years.
CNN's
'Reliable Sources' Turns Network's Colossal Screwup Into An Attack On Trump. CNN's "Reliable Sources," hosted
by Brian Stelter, bills itself as a show that provides "the story behind the story, how the media really works, and how the
news really gets made." But the show, which airs Sunday mornings, failed to live up to that billing in its discussion
of its massive screwup on a CNN story about Trumpworld that the network was forced to correct on Friday [12/8/2017]. Stelter
addressed CNN's blunder for a couple of minutes, offering up a brief review of the reporting of the story. The media
reporter then quoted the network's public relations department, which downplayed the scandal.
'The
LEAST trusted name in news': Trump blasts CNN. President Trump blasted CNN on Saturday over a mistake in its
report which wrongly claimed his son Donald Jr. received hacked DNC files before they were made public, describing the error
as 'vicious and purposeful'. In his weekly early-morning flurry of tweets at around 8am, the president fumed: 'Fake News
CNN made a vicious and purposeful mistake yesterday [12/8/2017]. 'They were caught red handed, just like lonely Brian Ross
at ABC News (who should be immediately fired for his "mistake").[...]'
18
Questions CNN Needs To Answer After Getting Busted For Fake News. Early on Friday, CNN promoted its latest
breathless report purporting to show collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. CNN has been extremely invested
in the narrative of collusion for the last year. In June, CNN was forced to pull one of its Russia-Trump conspiracy
stories that "did not meet CNN's editorial standards." The discredited story was based on a single anonymous source who
connected Anthony Scaramucci, a prominent ally of President Trump, to a Russian investment fund managed by a Kremlin-controlled
bank. Three journalists who worked on the story were fired.
7 Times CNN
Botched The News In 2017. CNN has had a rough 2017 and it's not even over yet. The news network has
repeatedly made key errors when breaking big stories, only to get embarrassed when the facts come to light.
Laura
Ingraham Rips CNN For 'Sloppy Reporting': 'Sometimes It's Not Fake News, It's Just Wrong News'. On Friday night
[12/8/2017], Laura Ingraham slammed CNN for their botched report on Donald Trump Jr. 'Sometime it's not fake news; it's
just wrong news," Ingraham began. Earlier that morning, CNN reported that during the election, WikiLeaks gave Don Jr.
accesses to hacked DNC emails before they were made public. That report turned out to be inaccurate and was corrected
in the afternoon. The Fox News host said that the error left CNN "once again with fried egg on its face." She then
listed some of the media's mistakes, [...]
Watch
CNN Trot Out Reporter Who Published Fake News To Correct His Own Fake News. CNN made an egregious reporting
error Friday [12/8/2017] on the potential connection between Donald Trump Jr. and Wikileaks. The story, which was
touted by the network for many hours on broadcast and social media as a bombshell turned out to be factually incorrect and
insignificant. CNN's original report definitively stated that Don Jr. received access to secret Wikileaks information
via email on Sept. 4, 2016. In fact, that email was sent on Sept. 14, after the said documents were released to the
public. CNN pushed the fake story for hours, even after the email in question was made publicly available to disprove
the reporting. In a humiliating move, CNN decided to have one of the authors of the debunked story go on air to
"correct" his reporting.
Yet more ammo
for the 'fake news' critics. We certainly understand the rush to be first in this business. But the
increasingly desperate attempts by an anti-Trump press to prove Russian collusion are leading to gaffes that make readers
question even legitimate stories.
Another
CNN "Russia Bombshell" Story Explodes in Their Faces. Mere hours after CNN reported on an "exclusive," alleging
the Trump campaign received Wikileaks information before it was public, the story came crumbling down with the Washington
Post reporting that the emailed information in question was already public before being emailed to the campaign.
WaPo:
CNN Misreported WikiLeaks Providing Trump Access to Email Tranche. Earlier today [12/8/2017], CNN said that
Congressional investigators obtained an email that was sent last year to President Trump, Donald Trump Jr., and other senior
company officials. The email reportedly contained tools that would allow users to get an early look at the hacked
information Wikileaks released during the last months of the 2016 election. However, Washington Post reports that CNN
got the email dates wrong, and the decryption key would've only led Trump officials to information that was already publicly
available. CNN says the email was sent on September 4, though WaPo says it was sent on September 14, a day
after the documents in question were released.
CNN's
Awful Week: Lies, Meltdowns, Ratings Collapse, New Discrimination Suit. Until CNN turned into a 24/7
RedBaitingAntiTrumpFakeNewsHateMachine, the left-wing network was in second place, beating MSNBC much more often than
not. So not only has CNN lost more than half of its year-over-year viewers, it has lost its bragging rights over its
left-wing counterpart at MSNBC. And things continue to get worse, primarily through unforced errors caused by CNN's
blinding hate and rabid partisanship. Without a doubt, CNN has just suffered through its worst week since those
hilarious weeks back in June when CNN staffers had to be fired over hate-sprees against President Trump, and a barrage of
firings occurred after the network was caught red-handed telling one audacious lie after another.
CNN's Undisclosed
Ties To Fusion GPS. CNN's reporting on the Trump-Russia dossier has left out at least one crucial fact: the
close ties between the network and the opposition research firm at the center of the dossier controversy. CNN's reporting
on the dossier, led by justice correspondent Evan Perez, has been favorable to the firm, Fusion GPS, and hyped the dossier's
credibility. Left out of Perez's reporting, which has relied largely on unnamed sources, is his personal closeness to
Fusion GPS' operatives. Fusion has repeatedly been described in Senate testimonies as a smear-for-hire operation that
manufactures misleading or false media narratives for its clients.
Report
Reveals CNN's Close Ties to Trump-Smearing Firm Fusion GPS. As more details emerge about the murky swamp that
funded Fusion GPS's work on the salacious Trump dossier, a new report reveals CNN's own ties to the smear-for-hire
firm. CNN's justice correspondent Evan Perez, who has reported extensively on the Russia investigation and the Trump
dossier, is close personal friends with Fusion GPS's founders, according to a report by the Daily Caller.
Three
More Trump/Russia 'Bombshells' Turn Out To Be Duds. Over the weekend, CNN offered up a shocking
revelation: Russia had enlisted Pikachu and his Pokemon pals in its effort to get Donald Trump elected president.
Well, not really. It was just the latest nonstory whipped up by the Trump-hating press.
CNN
Continues to Solidify Its Place Atop the Fake News Dung Heap. In the ongoing battle between President Trump and
the always hostile mainstream media, CNN has taken center stage as either the fight's biggest victim or its most egregious
offender, depending on one's perspective. I vote the latter. [...] This isn't journalism, it's a slander party.
CNN
throws in the towel on fake Russian news. CNN has dismantled its vaunted Trump-colluded-with-the-Russians
investigative unit in a wretched concession to reality. The only thing the unit found was an empty well for stories,
surrounded by a crust of fake news. The whole caper damaged the network's credibility, and the public just wasn't
buying it anymore. So the whole unit had to go. What a shabby end to what the network had put so much stock in in
the heady days of trying to oust President Trump just as he had taken office.
CNN
Pulled Investigative Team Off Trump-Russia Coverage. CNN executives explicitly told their investigative team to
stop looking into potential ties between the Trump administration and Russia following a series of high profile reporting
errors led that to the resignation of three journalists in June. Executives transferred all reporting duties associated
with the Trump-Russia narrative to CNN's Washington, D.C. team in the wake of a retracted June report, members of the CNN
staff told The New York Times. The report in question was removed from CNN's website after the network admitted it could
not stand by information that tied then Trump advisor Anthony Scaramucci to a Russian investment bank under Senate sanctions.
Something
Very Odd In That "CNN Crew Rescuing Man in Truck" Video. Perhaps you might have seen the story of Drew Griffin
from CNN and a spontaneous, and serendipitous, CNN crew's rescue of a Texas man who drove his truck into a canal. Kudos
for CNN being in the right place at the right time and doing the right thing etc. CNN has been playing up the video all
day as an act of spontaneous CNN bravery in a moment of emergency and crisis. High-fives and back-pats all around.
[Video clip] Except someone noticed something weird about it. Either there's another guy in the video and the footage
makes it seem weird and conflated, or Drew Griffin had time to change clothes between the moment the man drove into the canal and the
moment Griffin "rescued" him.
CNN:
From Fake News to Fudging Ratings? CNN has reacted very badly to the political rise of President Trump,
promulgating fake news and presenting an echo chamber of negative commentary. Now, the struggling news channel appears
to be trying to manipulate the ratings. Even if it's not the originator of the Fake News model that now largely defines
the MSM, CNN has certainly perfected it.
CNN:
'Ordinary People Are 'White Supremacists by Default'. On Thursday [8/24/2017], CNN's John Blake published a
story blaming "ordinary people" for making Charlottesville possible, and quoting a history professor who called such people
"white supremacists by default." "We are a country with a few million passionate white supremacists — and tens
of millions of white supremacists by default," Mark Naison, a political activist and history professor at Fordham University
in New York City, told CNN. "You have to have millions of people who are willing to be bystanders, who push aside evidence
of racism, Islamophobia, or sexism. You can't have one without the other." Blake, the CNN reporter, paraphrased
activists like Naison saying "the tragedy that took place in Charlottesville this month could not have occurred without the
tacit acceptance of millions of ordinary, law-abiding Americans who helped create such a radically explosive climate."
The Editor says...
No, all it takes is a few inflammatory cable TV news propaganda channels to "create such a
radically explosive climate."
Provocateur Journalism.
When a news organization reports an impending weather event based on forecasts from the National Weather Service, or warns of potential
seismic activity anticipated by the U.S. Geological Survey, or alerts the public concerning an infectious-disease outbreak being tracked
by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, no one questions the news organization's motives, because the underlying information
is factual and derived from a reliable, nonpartisan, and authoritative source. CNN presents itself as a news organization, yet today [8/17/2017]
it posted a dubious story titled "Here are all the active hate groups where you live," based entirely on data from the Southern Poverty Law
Center. The SPLC is not the equivalent of the National Weather Service, the USGS, or CDC, to put it mildly. It is risible for
CNN to recite SPLC data uncritically, with no additional validation, as a credible list of "domestic hate groups," let alone to describe
SPLC's data as "widely accepted."
Charlottesville,
Barcelona, and the Left's Nostalgia for Nazism. Within minutes of the announcement of the vehicular terror attack in Barcelona,
Jim Sciutto and Wolf Blitzer of CNN were opining that the horrifying events in Spain may have been inspired by (i.e. were a copycat of)
Charlottesville. The implications of this comparison are not only wrong-headed, they are reactionary and dangerous to the American
public and the world. [...] It isn't because of neo-Nazis or the KKK that it's been decades since any of us has walked onto an airplane or
entered a concert or museum without being examined or x-rayed, that our daily lives have not been the same.
Jim
Acosta is exactly why cameras were kept out of WH briefings. When the White House stopped allowing cameras in
the press briefings, no one was more vociferous against the move than CNN's Jim Acosta. He went on an unceasing tirade
against the practice. This week he proved why he ranted against it — and why the White House may have been
smart to institute the practice. It wasn't really about transparency. It was about Jim Acosta being able to make
the briefings about himself and not the president. An exchange this week between Acosta and presidential adviser
Stephen Miller proved why then-press secretary Sean Spicer was right to make the move.
CNN's
Jim Acosta Read The Statue Of Liberty Poem, Had A Meltdown When Someone Suggested Immigrants Be Able To Read It, Too. Jim Acosta
took a rhetorical beating today [8/2/2017]. Over the past couple of months he's been one of the loudest voices grousing about the Trump
administration's policy of conducting off-camera press briefings. Listening to him, a person might have been under the impression that
the First Amendment features a clause granting senior White House correspondents from CNN the right to grandstand on national TV every day.
Acosta happens to be one of the strongest arguments for keeping daily briefings off camera. Most often these exchanges are excruciatingly
uninformative, pitting dishonest administration officials against crusading journalists who offer ideological statements in the form of pretend questions.
Acosta Pulls the Media's Mask Off. It is
impossible to overstate the partisan jackassery of CNN, which is at once a product of the cynical, ratings-driven scumbaggery of its head Jeff
Zucker and the pretentious liberalism of its "reporters," almost all of whom come from Democratic circles. What an astonishing collection of frauds.
With their anchormanish baritones, they try to hoodwink viewers into thinking they are "serious" journalists. But they are all just liberal activists playing
reporters on TV. Jake Tapper was a Dem staffer. So was Jim Sciutto. Christiane Amanpour, last heard lecturing journalists on the need to drop
"neutrality" in its coverage of Trump, is married to former Clinton staffer James Rubin. And the list goes on and on. Out of this ethos came Jim
Acosta, who, thanks to Trump, has justly become the face of fake news.
CNN's
Jake Tapper Claims 'Every Intelligence Expert' Under Trump, Obama Affirms Russia Interference. During
yesterday's [7/23/2017] State of the Union program on CNN, host Jake Tapper wildly asserted that "every intelligence expert,
both under the Obama administration and under the Trump administration" agrees with the assessment that Russia attempted to
interfere in the 2016 presidential election. Tapper did not explain how he concluded that "every intelligence expert,
both under the Obama administration and under the Trump administration" made such an assessment.
CNN's
Jake Tapper Caught Misstating His Background on Live Television. Jake Tapper, a CNN anchor, has been caught misstating his
background on live television on Sunday [7/23/2017]. During an interview with President Donald J. Trump's new White House
Communications Director Anthony Scaramucci, Tapper inflated his background to make it seem as though he was more in touch with people
with working- and middle-class beginnings than he really is.
How
CNN took on President Trump and lost. [Scroll down] [Jeff] Zucker was not a journalism guy, but he
understood numbers. He lived and died by them. His philosophy at CNN was to stay on anything that its viewers
were watching whether it was a missing Malaysian plane or Trump. CNN's old strategy of "flooding the zone" with
meaningless non-coverage of a breaking event was merged with Zucker's own preference for reality television to create a
constant coverage circus. Hiring a ton of reporters from across the spectrum, from a New York Times Pulitzer Prize
winner to the BuzzFeed trolls, would flood the zone with Trump scandals. CNN would have the most Trump scandals and the
most viewers. It was a great strategy for manufacturing a whole bunch of fake news scandals. And things that
don't even qualify as fake news. Like wondering whether Trump is afraid of stairs.
Legal
Experts: CNN Committed Multiple Felonies. So arrogant and self-righteous have liberal news outlets
become, that they now take it upon themselves to hunt down and blackmail private citizens who dare to mock theor pomposity or
make fun of the elf-appointed hall monitors of news. Blackmail is a harsh term, but it applies to what CNN did to the
Reddit user who made the now infamous wrestling GIF showing Trump pummeling an opponent with a CNN logo for a head.
Thanks
CNN! Worst media moments of the week. Being biased is one thing. Threatening online anonymity another.
That led to even The New York Times trying to explain how such online battles evolve. "Remarkably, the CNN episode has
managed to unite the notoriously fractious right-wing meme community under a common cause." Posters have revealed home
addresses and more from several CNN staffers in response and have claimed they will keep fighting. The network probably
wishes the whole thing would just go away. The online community isn't likely to let that happen.
The Long
List of Lies. Would it be possible to list all the lies CNN tells? The network fed questions to Hillary
Clinton prior to debates. And that was when Clinton was fighting Bernie "I'm a Loser" Sanders. She still couldn't
get by that imbecile without cheating. Next, CNN twisted polls to make the Clinton camp believe Hillary Clinton was a
rock star. That didn't end well. More recently, CNN buried the truth of terror attacks, hiding their Muslim
connection. In one such incident, the attacker was Muslim, shouted, "Allahu akbar," yet CNN called the guy a Canadian
and buried the story under a piece about The Bachelor.
CNN
Admits in 30th Paragraph that Trump was Right about Intel Agencies' Assessment on Russia. CNN, far from a
neutral news source, wrote a very long piece on President Trump's relationship with the country's intelligence agencies.
However, they buried the truth that the liberal media overestimated how many intelligence agencies believed the Russian
government meddled in the 2016 election. Where did they admit the truth? In the 3oth and 31st paragraphs.
CNN's
Zucker doesn't know his Dumpster's on fire. CNN is a Dumpster on fire, but its boss is clueless. Jeff
Zucker's background is broadcast TV, a world of sitcoms, dramas, and reality shows. He fails to realize that what he
saw as small mistakes — the Russian dossier story, the false preview of Comey's testimony, and the retracted story
about Scaramucci being investigated — were major problems. None of CNN's competitors on TV had even one Fake
News scandal that large. CNN had three.
CNNBlackmail
Is the Best Thing Since Trump Got Elected. [T]he left isn't interested in logic and facts — and
hasn't been for quite some time. That was what James O'Keefe recently uncovered — not that we couldn't have
guessed anyway — with his recent sting on CNN. Here is an organization which affects the demeanor of a
responsible, politically-neutral, internationally-respected news outlet with reporters and newscasters who look exactly like
real ones on grown up TV channels. But underneath, its entire raison d'etre and business model is churning out leftist
fake news propaganda. If conservative media outlets like Breitbart took the same liberties with the truth as leftist
media outlets like CNN (and Vox and Slate and Salon and Huffpost and the rest...) they would be crucified.
CNN's
Jim Acosta Busted for Fake News in Failed Attempt to Slam Trump. NN's Jim Acosta accused President Donald Trump
of "fake news" on Thursday for claiming that "three of four" intelligence agencies had identified Russia as the culprit in
hacking during the 2016 presidential election — but the president was right, and Acosta was wrong. Last
week, the New York Times was forced to issue a correction, admitting that "17 intelligence agencies" had not, in fact,
accused Russia, as Hillary Clinton had once claimed.
CNN
Threatens To Expose Non Compliant Citizen for Thinking Wrong Thoughts. In an article identifying the
originating source of the wrestling gif tweeted last week by President Donald Trump, CNN says they'll keep his name private
so long as the person remains compliant to the media thought police. The direct threat is: "CNN reserves the
right to publish his identity should any of that change." [...] Got that comrades? Failure to remain a compliant
citizen may render you subject to targeting by CNN corporate media. Worth remembering. CNN has instituted a
multi-level corporate approval process for all media articles. That means everyone within the media organization from
top tier executives through legal departments and editors approved of this statement.
Media errors
give Trump fresh ammunition. A string of high-profile corrections and retractions by major news organizations
on stories about President Trump or his allies have fueled more allegations of bias in the mainstream press. The
relationship between Trump and the news media regularly hits new lows, with insults flying between the two camps and
reporters warning that the president is inciting violence against journalists. But Trump's allies on the right believe
the president's claims that the mainstream media is "fake news" have been bolstered by recent missteps. They point to
recent admissions from top news outlets — including CNN, the New York Times and the Associated Press —
that bombshell stories were either overcooked or included incorrect details.
CNN's Fake News
Machine. In April, media types were crowing that CNN had brought in Eric Lichtblau who had been, in the
Washington Post's words, at "the forefront of the New York Times's reporting on the relationship between the Trump
presidential campaign and Russia." It was "an investment in investigative reporting and the sprawling Russia story".
It didn't take long for the investigative investment to sprawl badly. Lichtblau has resigned from CNN in a growing scandal
over a Fake News story about a Trump associate. "Eric will guide our coverage and thinking," Lex Haris, executive editor
of CNN Investigates, had boasted. "And when he's onto a investigation, he'll still be reporting and writing too."
Not for long. And Haris has joined Lichtblau on the unemployment line after the Fake News scandal.
CNN screws up — again. We're told CNN
flew into a panic on Friday [6/30/2017] after it accidentally aired a fake National Enquirer cover during Jake Tapper's broadcast. Tapper did
a segment on his "The Lead" show about Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski's claim that Donald Trump tried to blackmail them with a hit piece in the
National Enquirer. During the piece, it showed a cover from the tabloid, which seemed to be about a scandal involving GOP senator Ted Cruz and
his wife, Heidi Cruz. Unfortunately, the cover is — literally — fake news. The cover — which has the
headline "Heidi Cruz: Betrayed by Cheating Husband!" and promised details on a "sordid threesome, sleazy love letters and sensational photo
proof — has never appeared on the National Enquirer, according to sources at the magazine.
Seniors
Group Files FCC Complaint Against Very Fake News CNN. The Association of Mature American Citizens (AMAC), the leading conservative
seniors' organization in the country, filed a complaint with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Thursday [6/29/2017] over CNN's reporting
on Russian hacking. In the light of hidden camera videos from James O'Keefe's Project Veritas showing a CNN producer calling the narrative
"bulls***," and CNN Contributor Van Jones's characterization of the Russia "collusion" story as a "nothing burger," AMAC has brought a complaint
under FCC regulations against the knowing broadcast of false information.
CNN's Latest Retraction Is Just the
Tip of the Fake News Iceberg. Even the best reporters make serious mistakes. When that happens, as it will, it's best to take responsibility
and move on, as CNN did in this case. Certainly this decisive action taken in response to a serious problem is a great start. But taking responsibility
for just one of the many flawed stories CNN has been pushing is nowhere near sufficient a response to the institutional problems plaguing the media outlet.
The serious problems with CNN's approach to the Russia-Trump collusion conspiracy are much deeper than just one story, go back many months, and involve several
stories and larger themes that no one at CNN has bothered to sufficiently explain. Let's look at a few of those stories.
The coming crash of the
lawless media. Sniping and rock-throwing at Donald Trump, a game that any number can play and nearly everybody does, has become a game
with no rules and no referees, and worse, no editors to restrain obstreperous children breaking up the furniture. CNN, once a fairly
reliable source of news, with a weakness for trivia and given to peddling old news as the new thing, is now an inviting target for imaginative libel
lawyers. Three of its most prominent editors and "producers" were sacked this week after the network was forced to retract and apologize for a
story it made up about a condant of President Trump, that he and his hedge fund was being investigated by the U.S. Senate for colluding with the
Russians for nefarious purpose.
Joe
Scarborough Calls President Trump 'Greatest Liar That's Ever Sat In The White House'. MSNBC "Morning Joe"
co-hosts Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski bashed President Donald Trump Wednesday, calling him worse than former President
Richard Nixon and the "greatest liar that's ever sat in the white house." Scarborough played a clip of Brian Karem,
executive editor of The Sentinel Newspapers, at Tuesday's [6/27/2017] White House briefing challenging Deputy Press Secretary Sarah
Huckabee Sanders, saying her criticism of the media was inflaming the American people. Sanders responded at the briefing
by citing a debunked Washington Post story stating reporters were not being thorough enough in their critiques of the president.
CNN
faced $100M lawsuit over botched Russia story. The specter of a $100 million libel suit scared CNN into
retracting a poorly reported story that slimed an ally of President Trump's — and forcing out the staffers
responsible for it, The [New York] Post has learned. The cable network's coverage of Trump transition-team member
Anthony Scaramucci came amid federal scrutiny of corporate parent Time Warner's pending purchase by AT&T — and the
widespread belief among media execs that CNN President Jeff Zucker can't survive a merger. CNN immediately caved after
Scaramucci, a financier and frequent network guest, cried foul and threatened to take legal action, sources said Tuesday.
CNN
Just Got Hit by a Massive Truth Bomb — The Facts of Life Are Conservative. As a fellow human being I
feel sorry for the poor guy caught on camera by Project Veritas admitting this stuff — because he's probably going
to lose his job. But [...] It just seems to me that one of the most basic, entry-level precepts that any serious news
organization ought to be observe — and that CNN most patently never has observed, or not for a very, very long
time — is this: Facts are sacred. The truth always makes the best story.
CNN
Producer Admits Witch Hunt Against Trump. CNN producer John Bonifield made the brazen admission of the
network's absence of journalistic bona fides to an undercover reporter from ACORN-slayer James O'Keefe's investigative
nonprofit, Project Veritas. "He not only gave us a tour of CNN's main newsroom, he gave us a window into the editorial
bias and anti-Trump agenda of the organization," O'Keefe says as he narrates the video. Project Veritas is touting the
video as the first installment in a multi-part investigation the group calls "American Pravda."
Three
journalists quit CNN in fallout from retracted Russia story. Three CNN journalists who worked on a now-retracted story about Russia and a top
Trump adviser are leaving the network. CNN is casting their departure as resignations in the wake of the fiasco, but the network has come under substantial
criticism since apologizing for the story. The move would also help CNN's legal position in case of a lawsuit. Anthony Scaramucci, the Trump adviser
who is the target of the story, told me that he has no plans to sue. He said he has accepted CNN's apology and wants to move on. But Scaramucci
also told me in an earlier interview, "I was disappointed the story was published. It was a lie."
White
House: CNN 'a Disgrace to All of Media, to All of Journalism'. Deputy Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders
told the White House Press Corps on Tuesday [6/27/2017] that CNN was "a disgrace to journalism." Sanders's remarks came after
CNN retracted a "fake news" story over the weekend alleging links between a member of President Donald Trump's transition team
and a Russian firm, and after an exposé on Monday [6/26/2017] by James O'Keefe's Project Veritas showed a CNN producer
admitting the Russia story was [false].
How
CNN's Fake News Machine Ran. The men behind the disaster were no lightweights. Thomas Frank had been
nominated for a Pulitzer. Eric Lichtblau had shared a Pulitzer for bashing the Bush administration over, of all things,
surveillance. Their names were all over CNN hit pieces tying to tie Trump to an impeachable Russian scandal. That
was what they had been hired for. CNN claimed that Lichtblau had been "reporting on Comey for more than a decade."
And Frank was busy rolling out fresh grist for the Trump-Russia mill. One Frank article on CNN breathlessly claimed,
"One week, three more Trump-Russia connections." CNN was riding the impeachment train to Moscow. And yet
Lichtblau's tenure at CNN quickly became troubled.
CNN
Exposed: Producer Admits Anti-Trump Obsession Without 'Any Giant Proof'. The secret-taping squad at
Project Veritas are making sure CNN has a bad public-relations week. On the heels of three journalists resigning over
an unsubstantiated online report on Russia and Trump, CNN Health producer John Bonifield is caught on tape admitting that CNN
is producing news for liberals, and that talking about "cutesy little ethics" is "adorable" when cable news is a "business."
PV says the conversations were taped in June. Liberal journalists usually respond to PV videos in two ways. First,
they charge the videos are "deceptively edited," so somehow what the target says doesn't mean anything; and second, they absolutely
fail to ask their own questions and follow up. See last year's tapes on Democratic activists admitting they were stoking
violence at Trump rallies and so on.
Heads
Are Bouncing On The Floor At CNN Headquarters. Yesterday [6/25/2017], CNN pulled what was promoted as a major
story from the its website, disabled all leaks to the story, and issued an apology to the subject, Trump adviser Anthony
Scaramucci. The ostensible reason was that the story failed to meet CNN's editorial standards... which tells you all
you need to know about how bad the story was. BuzzFeed reported that CNN honcho Jeff Zucker was personally leading the
investigation, an act that can only be interpreted as desperately trying to head off a multi-million dollar lawsuit.
American Pravda: CNN.
Project Veritas has released a video of CNN Producer John Bonifield who was caught on hidden-camera admitting that there is
no proof to CNN's Russia narrative. [...] According to the CNN Producer, business is booming. "Trump is good for
business right now," he concluded. Bonifield further goes on to explain that the instructions come straight from the
top, citing the CEO, Jeff Zucker: [...]
CNN
Producer Spills All on Russia Fake News. A veteran CNN producer has spilled the beans, on camera, about the
fake news network's intentional obsession with the "Trump-Russia" narrative. James O'Keefe, founder of Project Veritas,
has released a video in which CNN producer John Bonifield describes the network's orders to relentlessly push the
"Trump-Russia" story, [...] The American people have had enough of the fake news media lying about our president, and
now CNN has some explaining to do.
Three
CNN Employees Resign Over Retracted Story on Russia Ties. Three CNN employees have handed in their resignations
over a retracted story linking President Trump to Russia, the network announced Monday [6/26/2017]. Thomas Frank, who
wrote the story in question; Eric Lichtblau, an editor in the unit; and Lex Haris, who oversaw the unit, have all left CNN.
"In the aftermath of the retraction of a story published on CNN.com, CNN has accepted the resignation of the employees involved
in the story's publication," a network spokesperson said in a statement Monday [6/26/2017].
Three
Employees Resign from CNN Amid Very Fake News Scandal. Three CNN employees have resigned amid the network's very fake news scandal in which
it was forced to retract a hit piece on President Donald Trump and his associates. "CNN said Monday [6/26/2017] that three journalists, including the
executive editor in charge of a new investigative unit, have resigned after the publication of a Russia-related article that was retracted," CNN's Brian
Stelter reported late Monday. "Thomas Frank, who wrote the story in question; Eric Lichtblau, an editor in the unit; and Lex Haris, who oversaw the
unit, have all left CNN."
Very
Fake News Scandal Consumes CNN as Jeff Zucker, Network Flack Refuse to Comment on Russia Retraction to Own Network. The
scandal surrounding CNN's mishandling of a very fake news hit piece on President Donald Trump and his associates grows bigger on Sunday
night [6/25/2017] as the network's president Jeff Zucker and public relations team are refusing to comment to anyone — even
to CNN media reporter Brian Stelter — about what happened. Stelter, in his Sunday evening [6/25/2017] newsletter named
for the television program he hosts[,] Reliable Sources, credited a Breitbart News investigation with forcing what he admitted
is an embarrassing retraction for his employer CNN.
CNN
Has to Completely Retract a Major Anti-Trump Story. CNN, you will recall, ran a major story about James Comey
claiming that Comey would contradict the President on whether the President is being investigated. They went wall to
wall with the coverage of that story. Then James Comey did not contradict the President. CNN had to walk it all
back. Now they have done it again. On June 22, CNN ran a story claiming that Anthony Scaramucci had dealings
with a Russian investment group.
Trump
Supporters Plan Protest at CNN Headquarters in Atlanta to Decry Fake News. Debbie Dooley of Main Street
Patriots is hoping hundreds will gather at the headquarters of CNN in Atlanta on Saturday to protest what its members
consider fake news being produced by the giant media corporation. Specifically, Dooley told Breitbart News that they
object to the fake news being put out about President Donald Trump. "We're encouraging people to come out and support
our president," said Dooley, one of 22 national co-founders of the Tea Party and co-founder of Main Street Patriots.
"And to condemn the extreme biased coverage at CNN."
CNN
Caught Staging Fake News Scene. CNN was caught staging news in a video captured by citizen journalist, who
posted the footage to his Twitter account @markantro. Becky Anderson of CNN is seen in London handing props to a "peace
group." This footage was then passed off as real news by CNN.
Watch
as fake news created by CNN to confirm narrative of 'good Muslims'. Whenever Muslims act out the violence
against infidels that Islamic scripture requires, the left-wing media swing into action to create and reinforce a contrasting
narrative: that most Muslims condemn and fight such attacks. [...] Because the actual facts on the ground do not support
the benign view of Muslims as overwhelmingly hostile to terrorists and committed to peaceful coexistence, it is necessary to
create (not simply report) events that confirm the media narrative. CNN has just been caught creating a
fake news event to support its narrative, and its efforts were rewarded with pick-ups by the BBC and the AP, among
others. In this two-minute video, CNN puts together a handful of people, carrying pre-printed signs (no
spontaneity involved), and arranges them before the camera to look like a substantial crowd. The elevated stage is a
nice touch, confirming the professional expertise brought to bear in prepping this scene for the cameras.
CNN
Reporter Compares Trump To Hitler While Her Boss Buys Obama Photos. In the weeks after Donald Trump won the
election, CNN chief Jeff Zucker watched as one of his employees compared the new president to Adolf Hitler. At a White
House press conference Thursday [2/16/2017], Trump declared that he was changing his moniker for the network from "fake news" to
"very fake news." There's been a ton of well-publicized drama between the two camps. [...] You may think Trump is too
harsh on CNN. But take a look at how the network treated Trump back in November.
Hospital
CEO Wins Major Court Victory After Accusing CNN of False Reporting. Those who accuse CNN and other mainstream
media outlets of "fake news" will probably revel in a recent decision by a federal judge in Atlanta, Georgia. While
Judge Orinda Evans didn't all out declare that CNN was peddling in falsehoods, she did take aim at the network in an initial
judgment in favor of a former hospital CEO who sued CNN accusing them of purposely skewing statistics to reflect poorly on a
West Palm Beach hospital. Judge Evans didn't mince words in her 18-page order allowing the case to move forward, and
dismissing CNN's attempt to get it thrown out of court.
Yes, CNN IS Fake News.
The problem is this: CNN — like the New York Times, like the network news departments at NBC and ABC
and CBS — is virtually the definition of Fake News, a phrase made up by the left to attack Trump but which blew up
in their faces like a trick cigar when it turned out everyone knows what liars they've been for the past sixteen years at least.
This is not even a question of the almost ceaseless series of mistakes, distortions and obfuscations that our leftist news media, in
their hysterical rage against political reality, have committed since the election of Donald Trump to the presidency. These
errors and lies — which include cover-ups of Islamic extremism, lies about right-wing websites, and suspiciously incendiary
"mistakes" about the White House — are being ably catalogued by the mighty and terrible John Nolte over at the Daily Wire.
Stunning
Fake News — CNN Promotes Conspiracy Theory That Milo Organized Berkeley Protests Against Himself.
CNN has continued to lead the way in manufactured news cycles through the past two years. However, last night on Don
Lemon's show they took fake news broadcasting to new levels of ridiculousness. During a segment with Robert Reich, Don
Lemon and Reich promoted a conspiracy theory that Milo Yiannopoulous actually manufactured the Berkeley protests in an effort
to shut down his own speech: [Video clip]
CNN Is Now Least Trusted News
Network Among Viewers. A recent poll of cable news network viewers found that CNN's regular audience is far
more skeptical of the political news they receive than Fox News fans.
Study:
CNN least trusted among likely voters. CNN is less trusted by likely voters than its competitors at MSNBC and
Fox News, according to a new study. The study, conducted by Rasmussen Reports, said that 75 percent of likely voters
tend to watch at least some cable news per week to keep up with politics. Among that group, 42 percent watch Fox News,
35 percent watch CNN, and 19 percent watch MSNBC. However, the poll said a larger portion of Fox News and MSNBC
viewers trust those networks.
CNN
still pushing fake story about Muslim attacked by Trumpsters. CNN is the poster child for media bias and once
again they don't disappoint. [...] This woman claimed that the men drove up, got out and attacked her. That one was
wearing a Trump 'Make America Great Again' cap and they beat her and robbed her, stealing her belongings and hijab. She
also said they hurled racial slurs at her. She didn't realize there were cameras there and that they prove it never
happened. There were no other witnesses and it was labeled the hoax that it was.
Lemon:
CNN 'Sets the Standard for Integrity'. Last Tuesday, CNN's Don Lemon described his employer as the pinnacle of
journalistic integrity during a news segment ostensibly examining pervasive left-wing political bias in the news media.
"I have to say that, I work for this news organization and I think that it sets the standard for integrity," said Lemon of
his employer. [...] Lemon also denied that his former CNN colleague and current Democratic National Committee Interim Chair
Donna Brazile had provided questions to Clinton's campaign in advance of CNN-hosted presidential debates.
CNN
Caught Red-Handed Telling [a] Blatant Lie About Trump. CNN was caught lying about comments GOP presidential
nominee Donald Trump made at a campaign rally in Colorado over the weekend. The original CNN article was titled,
"Trump, skeptical of mail-in balloting, encourages voting more than once if necessary."
Mediaite
Catches CNN Falsely Claiming Trump Told Audience to Vote Multiple Times. Upon reviewing CNN's on-air coverage
of Trump's Colorado rally at the center of these false claims, the network actually aired live the entirety of Trump's
comments on Sunday [10/30/2016] about voting in the Centennial State. Somehow, the CNN Politics team still published
the butchered and erroneous Trump quote. I've provided video below of Trump's full comments that CNN's reporters didn't
appear initially interested in following. The headline has also been changed to include the acknowledgement that this
blog has been updated.
Trump's
Right: The Media Is Rigged. On Oct. 16 on his CNN show "Reliable Sources," host Brian Stelter took the
denial of liberal media bias to a new level. In the wake of hundreds of emails underlining media-Democrat collusion, he
insisted that every American should deny the evidence: "In Trump's world, journalists are really just (Hillary) Clinton
campaign workers in disguise, collaborating with her in an attempt to rig the election. This is not just false.
It's ludicrous, and it's damaging." On what planet does this man live? Even by Clinton News Network standards, this
is ridiculous.
CNN
anchor warns: 'Illegal' for you to look at WikiLeaks. WikiLeaks on Sunday called attention to remarks made by CNN anchor Chris
Cuomo in which he appeared to warn viewers that it was "illegal" for those outside of the media to look at emails from Hillary Clinton's
campaign chairman.
Special note to regular readers
of akdart.com:
It is illegal for you to watch CNN or MSNBC.
CNN
needs to stop deceptively editing videos. Creating a narrative through deception won't help victims or change
the minds of skeptics. When people see the media lying to them, it makes it difficult to believe the narrative being
crafted. Take the recent examples of CNN. The network has now twice edited videos to create alternate narratives in
regards to the recent shootings of two different black men by cops. Just this week, the pro-police group Blue Lives
Matter charged that the network deceptively edited video of the police shooting of Keith Lamont Scott. The full video,
taken by his wife Rakeyia, featured officers repeatedly telling Scott to "drop the gun." In the video aired on CNN,
no such demands were shown.
CNN
falsely adds 'racial' to Trump vetting comments. CNN added the word "racial" to Donald Trump's Monday
[9/19/2016] comments on terrorism and immigration and is running headlines reporting that the GOP presidential nominee spoke
of using "racial profiling" to stop terrorism. But a review of the transcript of Trump's comments to Fox News that CNN
quoted shows that Trump never used the word "racial" in his comments to the network and only spoke of "profiling."
Update: CNN's
Burnett Admits Her Show Was Wrong to Add 'Racial' to Trump Profiling Comments. In the midst of a heated but
civil debate on CNN Tuesday night, host Erin Burnett admitted on her eponymous show to Trump campaign manager Kellyanne
Conway that her program should not have aired a chyron on Monday's show suggesting that Donald Trump was in favor of "racial"
profiling. Burnett was twice pressed by Conway on why her show made such an editorial error and so Burnett paused the
debate to offer an explanation of regret.
CNN
anti-Trump lie BUSTED on air! If you imagine all the situations when the media reported on domestic and
international matters of great importance where the you-got-the-story-backwards truth would apply, you would likely be
occupied for the rest of your life and still not have identified every situation.
Trump:
"We Are Going To Punch Through The Media". Donald Trump hits the media, particularly CNN, 'the Clinton News
Network,' at a campaign rally in Harrisburg, Penn. Monday night [8/1/2016]. "We have a media that is so dishonest,"
Trump said. "These are among the most dishonest people you will ever, ever meet."
CNN's
Tom Foreman Caught Lying in Trump-Refugees 'Fact Check'. In a segment that was billed as CNN's "fact check" of Donald Trump's anti-Hillary speech,
CNN gave a demonstrably false presentation of U.S. immigration policy in an effort to undermine Trump's factually correct statements. The segment was
remarkable in that it not only revealed CNN's profound ignorance of federal immigration policy, but an examination of the segment's transcript also reveals
that CNN ignored and blatantly distorted what Trump had actually said. CNN's Tom Foreman accused Trump making a "false" statement about Hillary
Clinton's refugee policy when Trump statement was, in fact, true.
CNN
Asks Activist Behind Planned Parenthood Videos if He's a 'Violent Extremist'. In an
interview with the Center for Medicial Progress' David Daleiden, CNN's New Day host Alisyn Camerota
asked the activist behind the undercover Planned Parenthood videos to respond to criticism he was a
"violent extremist." "Your critics — critics of your organization I should
say — say that you're not journalists as you purport to be on your website, but rather
you're violent extremists," Camerota said to Daleiden.
The Editor says...
The abortion "doctors" are tearing babies apart and selling the pieces, and the guy who goes undercover to document
this practice is accused of being a "violent extremist." That's a textbook case of liberal media bias.
CNN's
Clinton Cash 'Fact-Check' Ends in Embarrassment for Cristina Alesci and Laurie Frankel. CNN Money's "fact-checkers" Cristina
Alesci and Laurie Frankel ended up with egg on their faces on Wednesday [6/22/2016] after they rated as "false" a well-established and proven
Clinton Cash fact involving Hillary Clinton's State Dept. approving the transfer of 20 percent of U.S. uranium to the Russian
government, as nine investors in the deal funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation. Under the guise of "fact-checking"
Donald Trump's Wednesday speech, Alesci and Frankel purported to verify whether "Clinton's State Department approved the transfer of 20% of
America's uranium holdings to Russia while nine investors in the deal funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation."
CNN
Caught Lying About Trump - Obama Does Back Gun Confiscation. For the last two days CNN has been lying about
Donald Trump in order to put itself in its favorite gear: the Trifecta Gear that allows the left-wing network to, all at
once, push gun control, protect Barack Obama, and attack a high-profile Republican as dishonest — in this case
frontrunner Donald Trump.
CNN Photoshops Oregon Jihadist
Shooter to "Fundamentally Transform" Him into a Caucasian Male. Remember the Trayvon Martin case? You know, the
dude involved in burglary, PCP-like drug cocktails, and/or drug dealing who assaulted George Zimmerman and got capped for his trouble?
Remember how the media claimed there was a new race called "White Hispanics", a term invented "by The New York Times to describe Zimmerman,
apparently in some kind of push for a white vs. Black narrative"? Good times. Well, the media is at it again, this time
photoshopping the Black Jihadist Oregon shooter [...] to make him appear white.
Trump
Reduces CNN To Outright Lying: Sanctuary Cities Don't Exist. Because he's a left-wing
propagandist working for a left-wing propaganda outlet, CNN New Day anchor Chris Cuomo told the
world today that sanctuary cities don't exist. The description is a "misnomer," Cuomo said. "They
are not safe havens," Cuomo added, "It's about how they follow the [immigration law] process." With a
straight face, Cuomo dropped this nuclear lie while doing what he never does to Democrats: interrogating
Michael Cohen, an advisor to Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump: [...]
Waco
Police Claim Threats From Non-Existent Motorcycle Gangs. [Scroll down] To the
contrary, the report factually stated in the first page that most sovereign citizens are nonviolent,
and that it will focus only on the violent fringe within a fringe — the people it calls
"sovereign citizen extremists," or SCEs. CNN Lied. The report describes their violence as
"sporadic," and it does not expect its rate to rise, predicting instead that the violence will stay
"at the same sporadic level" in 2015. The author or authors add that most of the violence consists
of "unplanned, reactive" clashes with police officers, not preplanned attacks. CNN Lied.
Of course, a week after the CNN propaganda the narrative of dangerous "Right-Wing Extremists" had
already been embedded with the help of a liberal media. Ridiculously, the words "right wing"
were never in the report in any shape or fashion. CNN Lied.
CNN
Correspondent Sanjay Gupta Allegedly Makes False Brain Surgery Claim. CNN
correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta, who served as a White House fellow before embarking on a career in
journalism, has been accused of falsely claiming that he helped perform brain surgery on an
eight-year-old while covering the April earthquake in Nepal. The Global Press Journal
reported Tuesday [7/7/2015] that the girl identified in the CNN report as having undergone a
craniotomy at the hands of Gupta never actually received surgery.
CNN
still running dubious right-wing vs. Muslim extremists statistic. CNN aired a statistic Friday morning
[6/19/2015] alleging that "right-wing extremism" is responsible for more deaths since Sept. 11, 2001, than "Muslim
extremism." The thing is: The statistic is dubious.
CNN, DHS and
SPLC's Blame-Righty Hit Job. The Department of Homeland Security refuses to release a
report on "right-wing" terrorism that somehow found its way into CNN's hands last week during the
farcical White House summit on Don't Say Islamic Extremism. [...] CNN splashed the big scoop on its
website: "DHS intelligence report warns of domestic right-wing terror threat." The fear-mongering
piece featured a huge map of 24 alleged acts of "violence by sovereign citizen extremists since
2010." [...] But a closer look at the rigging of that phony factoid simply confirms the malevolent
intention of so-called objective journalists and "hate watch" groups to marginalize conservative
political speech and dissent. The CNN/MSNBC/SPLC smear job involved both the dishonest deflating
of left-wing and jihadist incidents, and the dishonest inflating of "right-wing" incidents.
Political,
Scientific Chicanery Underlies Global Warming Alarmism. In her December 28 CNN
article, "How Germany Banishes Climate Myths," German environment minister Barbara Hendricks argues
that the climate policies enabled by her country and the EU as a whole have been an economic
success. This is nothing more than East German-style disinformation. The reality is that
Germany's so-called "Solar Valley" has become a mothballed industrial rust belt. Nearly all solar
energy manufacturers have closed their doors. [...] Hendricks' CNN article is just another example
of the use of fraudulent PR spin to promote a desired political message while ignoring the realities
of science and economics.
CNN Anchor:
'Our Rights Do Not Come From God'. During a heated discussion over gay marriage, CNN
morning Anchor Chris Cuomo opined that the unalienable rights endowed to all Americans do not come
from God. Cuomo was debating Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore on the constitutionality of same-sex
marriage. Near the end of the back-and-forth and after Moore argued that rights cannot be handed
down by men, Cuomo blurted out: "Our rights do not come from God, your honor, and you know that.
They come from man... That's your faith, that's my faith, but that's not our country. Our laws come
from collective agreement and compromise." [Video clip]
CNN's Crowley Admits
Obama Didn't Call Benghazi a Terror Attack. On the May 19 broadcast of CNN's State of the Union, host Candy Crowley said that
Obama was late in identifying the attacks in Benghazi as terrorism quite contrary to what she said during the Presidential debates late last year.
CNN
Anchors Fake a Satellite Interview in the Same Parking Lot. "Sorry, we're experiencing a delay in the broadcast while we
both wait for this bus to go by." Yes, those are all the same cars. Apparently they thought we wouldn't notice because Nancy
is on the right side of the screen, when in reality she is to Ashleigh Banfield's left.
Brian Williams
Truth-Challenged
Brian Williams Skeptical of Someone Else's Claims. Disgraced anchor Brian Williams, who has a history of not
telling the truth, on Wednesday [3/22/2017] offered a skeptical take on the claim by a Republican Congressman that Donald
Trump's aides were surveilled during the presidential transition. Regarding the assertions made by Representative Devin
Nunes, Williams explained in a doubting tone: "[Nunes] says he is now in receipt of information. It's intelligence
information that he found alarming enough to go down to the White House and brief the President. [This is] not
traditionally the role of the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee."
Brian
Williams complains about fake news — just 21 months after he lost his job on NBC Nightly News for telling made up
stories. Brian Williams has called out Donald Trump's transition team for spreading fake news stories. Williams,
who was suspended for six months and lost his spot as NBC Nightly News anchor for exaggerating stories about his time in Iraq and
New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina, blasted the President-elect's team on MSNBC on Tuesday night [12/6/2016]. 'Fake news
played a role in this election and continues to find a wide audience,' the 57-year-old said.
12
Fake News Stories from the Mainstream Media. [For example,] The adventures of Brian Williams: Brian
Williams' anchorman career at NBC News came to an end in 2015 after he was accused of lying about taking enemy fire while
helicoptering into Iraq in 2003. The accusation came from soldiers who were aboard the helicopter. Williams told the
story repeatedly, over a span of years, before he was called out. NBC executives recalled having a great deal of
difficulty getting Williams to admit he lied, and offer an unqualified apology. Amazingly, Williams still has a career
in broadcast journalism.
Brian
Williams Will Receive Evening Show on MSNBC. Despite his fall from prominence due to serial lying and removal
from the anchor desk of NBC Nightly News, current MSNBC breaking news anchor Brian Williams will be given another
chance to rein over a daily news program when, according to CNN's Brian Stelter, MSNBC awards him a half-hour show at
11:00 p.m. at a date to be determined.
Disgraced
Brian Williams Seeks 'Redemption' at MSNBC: 'Bad Precedent for Journalism'. Brian Williams, who spent 10 years
as the anchor and managing editor of the NBC Nightly News weekday program, and MSNBC, a cable affiliate known for its
liberal slant and perpetually low ratings, are combining their forces in an effort to improve their standing in the cable
news battle during the 2016 presidential contest.
Seriously?
Brian Williams Proclaims to Be the 'Purveyor of Truth and Justice'. A totally clueless Brian Williams on Monday night [2/1/2016]
warned MSNBC viewers to not fall for false information as Iowa caucus results rolled in. The man who became known for spinning vast
numbers of falsehoods while anchor at NBC News ominously began, "There's going to be some data floating around, especially the internet
tonight." He continued, "The first wave of that data is notoriously suspect. So, don't believe everything you see and hear
tonight." With no self-awareness, Williams proclaimed, "We hopefully will be the purveyors of truth and justice here."
The Editor says...
The internet is gradually replacing television as the primary national news medium in
America, and the broadcast networks are very aware of it.
(The evidence of this trend is abundant: Internet news and opinion sites are replete with advertising. If nobody looked for
local and national news on the internet, there would be few advertisers.)
Over the next few years, unless the internet is strangled by Big Government, the trend will continue.
The over-the-air broadcasters (and networks) are somewhat jealous of their internet competitors, which is why every TV station has a web site.
Even so, it isn't realistic to claim that the viewers can't believe anything they hear about an election except what they hear on television.
MSNBC
cuts back Katrina anniversary coverage to avoid awkward references. MSNBC has cut back its coverage of the 10th
anniversary of Hurricane Katrina to avert awkward references to outlandish claims Brian Williams made about his time in New
Orleans, it is reported. Williams, 56, asserted in a 2006 interview that he had seen a 'face-down' dead body float past
his hotel window in the Louisiana city's French Quarter in the aftermath of Katrina in September 2005.
Brian
Williams Scandal Shows Power of Social Media. The soldiers who prompted Brian
Williams's fall from one of the most powerful jobs in the media had first tried to blow the whistle
on him in 2003. But that was before the Internet became ubiquitous. And so, like most
people who had a problem with the news, the soldiers had few options.
Why
NBC cut Brian Williams loose as anchor — and really had no choice. In the end, NBC simply could not bring
Brian Williams back to the anchor chair. It wasn't just that he had irreparably tarnished his own credibility, and that of his
network, by fabricating a tale of Iraq War bravery. It was that the rank and file of his own news division was vehemently opposed
to Williams returning to "NBC Nightly News."
Quotes of the day.
The scandals that derailed the career of NBC News anchor Brian Williams are of the pathetic and pathological kind.
Obviously, Williams is not to be trusted. Nevertheless, other than the Katrina fairytales that were obviously meant
to damage President Bush, all of his lies were self-aggrandizing resume-enhancers.
When elites lie without much consequence,
the public follows their examples. [Scroll down] Few question network anchor newsreaders.
In Williams's case his "aw shucks" mellifluous shtick and understated dramatics were his versions of hexameters and
type scenes, and so made his lying a bit easier to swallow. After his brief suspension, Williams might even
return to his multimillion-dollar per year perch, with the understanding that he can restore NBC ratings and
profitability, and do that with occasional exaggeration rather than outright making up stuff. And
why not lie, when NBC itself doctors 911 tapes to confirm that George Zimmerman was a racist?
Brian
Williams Wants His Job Back Now, but NBC Isn't So Sure. The trial of Brian Williams is
not quite over, and the question of whether he'll be banished or welcomed back is far from settled.
Despite rumors that NBC News has completed its reportedly damning internal review of the suspended Nightly
News anchor's tall tales about his adventures in journalism, the probe isn't finished and its
conclusions are not fully baked.
Brian
Williams Knows He's Dead. For a brief moment earlier this week, it looked as though
Williams might have found a champion in Andrew Lack, the newly returned chief of NBC News.
According to a blind-sourced story in the [New York] Daily News, Lack was hoping to reseat
his old friend Williams in the network's anchor chair. But whoever launched that trial
balloon — presumably a Williams loyalist — must have been ducking for cover
the next day when the Hollywood Reporter and the New York Post sent high-velocity
rounds through the Daily News item with a blind-sourced story of its own. "They want
Brian to resign," an anonymous source told the Post. "If they have to fire him, they
can't control him."
NBC
News chief wants Brian Williams back on the air. This ship's captain doesn't want to
throw the anchor overboard. NBC News chief Andrew Lack is looking for a way to put Brian Williams
back behind the "Nightly News" desk, sources tell the Daily News — and Williams has told
confidants he won't leave the network unless he's fired. "Andy believes viewers want him (Williams)
back," the source said. "The feeling is that (Williams') problem seems to be more with the media and
other reporters than his viewers — if Andy can figure out a way to get him back on the air he
will do it."
Hillary
and Brian slide down the ladder. Who do you trust? A. Brian Williams B. Hillary
Clinton Both are important public figures. Both have been accused of deception. Both admit they
made mistakes. Both now ask for your forgiveness and your trust. But does either one deserve it?
Brian
Williams Inquiry Is Said to Expand. An NBC News internal investigation into Brian
Williams has examined a half-dozen instances in which he is thought to have fabricated, misrepresented
or embellished his accounts, two people with inside knowledge of the investigation said. The
investigation includes at least one episode that was previously unreported, these people said, involving
statements by Mr. Williams about events from Tahrir Square in Cairo during the Arab Spring.
NBC
execs leaked new details of Brian Williams 'lying' to shame him into resigning. Leaks
from the investigation into shamed newsman Brian Williams were given to the press to pressure him
into resignation, a report claims. News broke this weekend that the committee investigating the
NBC star found he lied in his reporting to make himself look good at least 11 times.
So
far, NBC News finds Brian Williams embellished at least 11 times. A months-long
internal investigation of Brian Williams by NBC News has turned up 11 instances in which the
anchorman publicly embellished details of his reporting exploits, according to a person familiar with
details of the probe.
Brian
Williams 'started lying because he felt insecure following Tom Brokaw and then blamed it on a
possible brain tumor'. Brian Williams started embellishing his stories because he felt
insecure following in Tom Brokaw's very large footsteps at NBC, according to a new report. The
network handed Williams a six-month suspension in February after he acknowledged he had lied about
being on board a helicopter that came under fire while reporting from Iraq in 2003. But according
to a report in Vanity Fair, Williams started exaggerating his stories because he felt insecure about
Brokaw, whom he succeeded at Nightly News in 2004.
Brian Williams the Canary.
The story of the Brian Williams saga wherein recorded video descriptions by Williams morphed from having only
heard about things that happened to those same things actually having happened to or witnessed personally by
him is simply an example of life in today's world of the highly visible Left. Williams is a political
iceberg that holds a whole lot more below the surface. All of it needs to be exposed if this nation
expects to survive in the real world of facts, "truth, justice and the American Way". Clark Kent is
needed just as Clark Kent. We don't need Superman.
When Network Lies Kill.
Since I haven't watched network news in decades, the saga about Brian Williams' Major Hoople persona
is more about drama than anything substantive to my interest. Whether Williams is a fabulist, an
incestuous voyeur who bragged about his daughter's soft porn role on HBO's 'Girls' or simply your
average liberal is less compelling to me than wondering if a more dangerous anchor will ever be
exposed for his lies. Unfortunately, Walter Cronkite is still revered as the most trusted man
in America even though his lies about the Vietnam War caused countless military deaths by prolonging
the conflict.
The
List: 32 Lies and Disputed Stories NBC News Let Brian Williams Tell For a Decade.
Numerous accounts now verify that NBC News not only wanted Brian Williams out there building his
brand with the likes of Jon Stewart, David Letterman, and Saturday Night Live, but that the
NBC brass knew their star was a serial liar. [...] Apparently, as long as Brian Williams' lies
helped build the NBC News brand and the "Nightly News" ratings, nobody in charge chose to say anything.
In
Big Sunday Story, WashPost Finds More Brian Williams Myths. A team of Washington
Post reporters did more myth-busting in the claims of Brian Williams in a Sunday front-page
story that continued to two whole pages inside the paper. The headline was "Williams undone by his
gift of storytelling: Anchor's love of a good yarn played a role in his downfall." Wild
exaggerations? "That's Brian being Brian" was the "newsroom shorthand."
NBC
investigating Brian Williams' claims that he witnessed fall of Berlin Wall and met Pope John Paul
II. NBC is expanding its inquiry into the alleged tall tales of suspended "Nightly
News" anchor Brian Williams, CNN reported Thursday [2/12/2015]. The network's internal
fact-checking is "nowhere near done," a senior NBC source told the cable news channel. The look
into Williams' exaggerated exploits has expanded beyond the anchor's claims about being in a
helicopter that was struck by an RPG during the 2003 Iraq War. The new focus will examine
Williams' claims that he, not his predecessor Tom Brokaw, was in Germany the day the Berlin Wall fell
and a story about meeting Pope John Paul II while a college student at Catholic University in 1979.
Journalists,
Lawyers, and Brian Williams's 'Misremembering'. In most instances, even in the smallest of markets, a
reporter might be able to get away with a single instance of "misremembering," or as it might be more appropriately
called in Williams' case, exaggeration. But any more than that and he or she would, or should, be fired.
The odds of that happening, however, are diametrically opposed to the amount of money a particular reporter could
generate for a newspaper or television station. The cub reporter on the newspaper, in other words, is more
likely to be fired than the lead anchor on a television station.
Another
Tall Tale From Brian Williams? Seal Team Six Claim Disputed. New details are emerging
about about what appears to be another tall tale of wartime heroics from recently suspended NBC News
anchor Brian Williams. [...] The chronology of Williams's account does not match up with what we
know about where he was and what he was reporting.
Despite
'Long Period' of Concerns at NBC, Williams Given $50 Million Contract in Dec. The
unraveling of Nightly News anchor Brian Williams's accounts of his reporting in Iraq and
Katrina-ravaged New Orleans has become a black mark on NBC News's reputation. A detailed account in
Thursday's Washington Post of the decision to suspend Williams for six months without pay appears
to demonstrate how seriously the Peacock Network has taken the newsman's transgression — NBC
Universal's CEO Steve Burke even considered firing Williams outright.
Within
NBC, an intense debate over whether to fire Brian Williams. Senior NBC officials
seriously considered firing anchor Brian Williams because he lied to his viewers about riding in a
military helicopter hit by a rocket-propelled grenade during the Iraq war, according to a top
network official. The ultimate decision to suspend Williams for six months was made after an
internal investigation unearthed other "instances of exaggeration," according to a person familiar
with intense behind-the-scenes discussions between network officials and Williams.
Credibility
of TV news in doubt long before Williams' gaffe. It's not a big deal if Brian Williams
eventually is fired, quits, or otherwise stops reading the news to viewers once his six-month
suspension is over. I'm not even sure it's a medium-sized deal. That may sound harsh, and it's
not personal. As a reader of the day's events, Williams is superb. His looks, delivery and style
helped NBC Nightly News to the top of the ratings heap. From updates about the war on terror to the
latest ice storm, he made viewers believe he is in the living room and speaking only with them. That takes
talent, but he messed up. There are consequences for a gaffe on the level that Williams committed.
Media
Elites Defend Brian Williams from 'Bile Brigade'. If you don't already despise the
elite media, the next few paragraphs should put the final pieces into place. No joke, some
high-profile members of the elite media are now on their high horse (if you'll pardon the
expression) over the frenzied coverage of serial stolen valor liar Brian Williams. In short,
members of the elite media don't think members of the elite media should be treated like members of
the elite media treat everyone else.
More
Brian Williams Exploits: Hezbollah Rockets, Mugged At Gunpoint!. Well, maybe Brian
Williams is not lying. Maybe he is just confused. Maybe he was held up at gunpoint on Christmas,
in Israel, after being attacked by a Hezbollah rocket, right after being almost killed in Iraq by an RPG.
Does
Brian Williams's incestuous voyeurism trump lying? What parent would cozy up with his
daughter to watch her in a graphic sex scene? Brian Williams did. As the mainstream media
erupts over Williams' fish tales about downed helicopters, dead bodies floating in flood-swamped streets
of New Orleans and burning puppies, another one of news anchor's bizarre behaviors is going unnoticed.
If NBC is embarrassed by its managing editor's fibs, what about Williams's kinky voyeurism when it comes to
his actress-daughter's explicit sex-capades on HBO?
Flashback:
Fawning Brian Williams Bows To POTUS At White House. Although I rarely watch any MSM
news shows, I do remember catching a segment on NBC, in June, '09, that I had found troubling:
Brian Williams, over a period of several days, had aired a two-hour special about the new president
and his life in the White House. At the end of the last segment, I was shocked when Williams,
saying goodbye, bowed to Obama.
Brian
Williams is just the latest symptom of a diseased legacy media. Are we seeing a trend
here? Dan Rather at CBS and now Brian Williams at NBC? Well, two news anchors are not a trend, but
biased and bad reporting is. It's not new, but it does seem to be gathering momentum and nowhere has
it been more apparent than the millions of words written and spoken about "global warming" and now
"climate change."
Bozell: 'Brian Williams has to go'.
Add conservative media watchdog L. Brent Bozell III to the list of those calling on NBC to dump
nightly news anchor Brian Williams for claiming he was on a military copter under attack. Bozell,
of the Media Research Center, said in a tweet today: "Brian Williams has to go. NBC's
credibility is completely shot."
Brian
Williams suspended without pay for 6 months by NBC. Brian Williams has been suspended
from "NBC Nightly News" without pay for six months, the network announced Tuesday [2/10/2015]. The
announcement comes amid an ongoing internal investigation into whether Williams exaggerated stories
during his public appearances as managing editor of the top-rated evening news program, both on NBC
and elsewhere.
Why
NBC's suspension is Brian Williams' last hope for remaining anchor. NBC Universal
tried to save Brian Williams' job last night — and that's why he was suspended for six
months. The company finally had to stop the bleeding, to halt the hemorrhaging of its own
credibility along with that of its franchise player. The brass slowly came to realize that
Williams had to be punished, and significantly, for the sin of fabricating a story about his 2003
trip to Iraq.
NBC in
Disarray Over Brian Williams. The embattled anchor goes into self-imposed exile and lawyers
up. Meanwhile, NBC investigates, successors line up, and Tom Brokaw watches from above.
Brian
Williams: puffed up anchor, puffed up tales. If even only some of the reports are
true, Brian Williams is a serial embellisher, a self-aggrandizing fabulist. No doubt everyone
knows somebody like this, and if you don't it's probably because you're that guy. But Williams' case
is special. This isn't some sad Willy Loman who needs to invent impressive stories about himself.
If anything, he needed to not tell such stories, given that he reportedly makes more than $10 million a
year to be a trusted name in news.
Brian Williams and
the God Complex. Brian Williams, the NBC News anchor, is taking himself off the air
for, what he says will be, "several days." He presumably hopes that the media firestorm surrounding
claims he made about his reporting experience in Iraq will subside. [...] However, there are some
scenarios in which he does not survive as an NBC anchor. One: if more fabrications surface from the
work of hundreds, probably thousands, of amateur detectives online — eager to prove that Williams
was not telling the truth when he claimed, for instance, that he saw a body floating beneath his hotel window
in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.
Under
Fire, Brian Williams Loses Lofty Spot on a Trustworthiness Scale. If Brian Williams's
future as the anchor of "NBC Nightly News" rests on his trustworthiness and ratings, new research
delivered some sobering news on Monday [2/9/2015]. Before Mr. Williams apologized for exaggerating
an account of a forced helicopter landing during the Iraq war, he ranked as the 23rd-most-trusted
person in the country — on par with Denzel Washington, Warren E. Buffett and Robin
Roberts. On Monday, he ranked as No. 835.
Multiple
Witnesses Contradict Williams' Katrina Stories. Now that everything he has ever said
about anything will be under scrutiny for a very long time, there is a lot out there. As of now,
though, it is Brian Williams' Tales from Katrina that are receiving an extra level of scrutiny. And
they are not holding up very well. Witnesses are calling Williams' Katrina stories of close
calls at the five-star Ritz-Carlton Hotel "crazy."
Pilot
Says He Told NBC News of Williams' False Story in 2003. Don Helus, who piloted the
chopper that sustained an RPG attack in the story that has embroiled NBC Nightly News anchor
Brian Williams in controversy, told CNN's Brian Stelter he contacted NBC News 10 years ago to inform
them of what he called Williams' inaccurate account of the attack — and received no
response. Williams is currently on a voluntary leave of absence after admitting a story he has
been telling for years about taking rocket fire in Iraq was untrue. Helus' chopper was attacked,
but Williams was nowhere near it.
Brian
Williams forced to admit he was NOT shot down in the Iraq War: NBC anchor apologizes.
NBC news anchor Brian Williams has been forced to admit that he wasn't aboard a helicopter hit and
forced down by enemy fire during the 2003 invasion of Iraq. The Nightly News anchor has often
repeated the war story over the past 12 years about how the aircraft he was on was forced down
by enemy fire.
NBC's
Brian Williams recants Iraq story after soldiers protest. NBC Nightly News anchor
Brian Williams admitted Wednesday [2/4/2015] he was not aboard a helicopter hit and forced down by RPG fire
during the invasion of Iraq in 2003, a false claim that has been repeated by the network for years.
Why NBC will stand by
its $200M man Brian Williams. NBC News chief Deborah Turness has millions of reasons
to save Brian Williams. Without its chief anchor to keep it at the front of the news pack, "NBC
Nightly News" is at risk of losing the multimillion dollar ad premium it has over rivals. "Nightly
News" raked in an estimated $200 million in annual ad revenue for NBC News in 2013.
Now
doubts arise over Brian Williams' story about being mugged at gunpoint in his quiet childhood
suburb. An old story often repeated by Brian Williams about his bravery growing up in
a quiet New Jersey suburb is being questioned by local residents in the light of his admission that
he lied about taking enemy fire in Iraq. Williams announced on Saturday [2/7/2015] that he is
temporarily stepping down from the NBC Nightly News amid questions about his false memories of war
coverage in 2003, calling it 'painfully apparent' that he has become a distracting news story.
We
shouldn't believe Williams' lie was an innocent mistake. [Brian] Williams originally
told the truth about what happened in 2003 Iraq: He was on a Chinook helicopter. Another helicopter
was hit by a rocket-propelled grenade (RPG). His helo was nowhere near the one that was struck and
landed some 30 or more minutes later. That isn't a near-miss; that's just rubbernecking at something
you didn't even know happened until you came along later.
Anchors
Aweigh. This was a bomb that had been ticking for a while. NBC executives were
warned a year ago that Brian Williams was constantly inflating his biography. They were flummoxed
over why the leading network anchor felt that he needed Hemingwayesque, bullets-whizzing-by flourishes
to puff himself up, sometimes to the point where it was a joke in the news division. But the
caustic media big shots who once roamed the land were gone, and "there was no one around to
pull his chain when he got too over-the-top," as one NBC News reporter put it.
Maureen
Dowd: NBC News Knew Brian Williams was 'Pathological'. According to Maureen Dowd in
the New York Times, NBC News executives knew Brian Williams had a problem with the truth but the
infrastructure wasn't in place to do anything about it. Per Dowd, things were so bad with Williams
that his "flourishes to puff himself up" became "a joke in the news division."
Brian
Williams' unmitigated disaster. It's an unmitigated disaster for Brian Williams and
NBC News. The revelation that the NBC anchor had lied on air about being in a helicopter that was
forced down after it was hit by enemy fire during the Iraq War is devastating. It's hard to see
how Williams gets past this, and how he survives as the face of NBC News. An anchor's No. 1
requirement is that he or she has credibility. If we don't believe what an anchor tells us,
what's the point?
Stolen
Valor Writ Large. While [Brian ] Williams will no doubt have most of the liberal media
and the Democrat party circling their wagons around him, there are some of his media colleagues who
are calling for his resignation, noting that as an anchorman, his perceived honesty is his most
essential qualification for the job.
Variety's
buried lede: "Senior" NBC News execs "counseled" Williams to stop telling helicopter story.
[Scroll down] That puts a whole new spin on the story, and NBC News' part in it. [Brian]
Steinberg has three sources that state that news execs barred Williams from telling his story on air,
at least during their broadcasts. If true, then that means that NBC News brass must have known
something was suspect about Williams' tale of courage under fire — otherwise,
why not tell the story that would reflect so well on their anchor?
Brian
Williams' heroic stories include Princess Di and Hurricane Katrina. He lives in a
vivid fantasy world that would make Walter Mitty blush — never missing a chance to
shamelessly play the hero or embellish a news story. Reality-challenged NBC anchor Brian Williams
once boasted about abandoning a dying buddy to cover the death of Princess Diana — but
said it was worth it because it won him worldwide fame.
The
Brian Williams Fiasco Is Worsening — More Possible "Fake Stories" Surface.
Things are going from bad to worse for NBC Anchor Brian Williams. Yesterday a report surfaced which
claimed a pilot remembered taking small arms fire while Williams was on board, this report was used
by those who defended Williams. However, that pilot has now walked back his story saying his memory
was wrong and he probably didn't have Williams on the flight.
NBC
News standing by Brian Williams in Iraq war-embellishment issue. NBC News is standing
by Brian Williams after the anchor's admission that he embellished his role in a military incident
during the Iraq war. The network has not commented publicly, but an executive familiar with the
matter says Williams will face no disciplinary action. His apology, delivered during the Wednesday
[2/4/2015] edition of "NBC Nightly News," was accepted internally.
Did
Brian Williams also exaggerate his Hurricane Katrina reports? On Wednesday [2/45/2015]
[NBC News anchor Brian] Williams blamed his mistake on the 'fog of memory over 12 years', but
evidence has emerged since that Williams has repeatedly mis-told the story including to late night
host David Letterman in 2013. The anchor's previous credibility as a highly regarded journalist
is based partly on his reporting from inside the New Orleans Superdome in the immediate aftermath of
Hurricane Katrina in September 2005.
Brian
Williams and the Tyranny of Ego. Like so many others, I find it impossible to believe
Brian Williams simply "made a mistake." At the risk of indulging in armchair pop psychology,
I'd say it's far more likely that a titanic ego collided with reality, and reality lost.
Did
Brian Williams lie about his Katrina experience, too? NBC News anchor Brian Williams
is in quite a bit of trouble over his admission that his decade-long claim to have endured heavy
fire while flying in a military helicopter over Baghdad in 2003 was a fabrication. Accordingly,
journalists are beginning to review other extraordinary claims Williams made over the course of his
career, and they are not short on material to parse.
Veterans
Livid Over Brian Williams' Lies. Veterans in all branches of the military who have
sacrificed to keep America safe are livid at NBC News anchor Brian Williams, who was forced to admit
this week that he had, for 12 years, lied about taking fire in a helicopter over Iraq.
Baltimore
Sun: Brian Williams Needs To Be Gone By Friday. Writing for the Baltimore Sun, media
journalist David Zurawik called for Brian Williams to resign or to be fired by Friday. "If
credibility means anything to NBC News, Brian Williams will no longer be managing editor and anchor
of the evening newscast by the end of the day Friday [2/6/2015]," Zurawik writes.
Brian
Williams faces internal investigation at NBC for lying about helicopter attack in Iraq: sources. The
head of NBC's investigative unit is breathing down Brian Williams' neck. Richard Esposito has been assigned
to investigate the embattled "NBC Nightly News" anchor for lying about dodging danger while reporting in Iraq,
sources told The [New York] Daily News on Friday [2/6/2015]. And the reporters and producers who work for
Williams are "shocked, furious and sad" about the scandal that that has wrecked the reputation of an anchor many
considered "the most trusted name in news," the sources said.
Rolling Stone
Leftists'
Utter Mindlessness about Voter Fraud. Never one to be accused of being the first to stop cheerleading for the
DNC, Andy Kroll of Rolling Stone Magazine recently published a piece titled "Wisconsin Is Ground Zero for the MAGA Effort to
Steal the Next Election." Pieces like this are always written the same familiar format. Republicans = bad.
Democrats = good. [...] The most important player on the stage is the "nonpartisan" because such people are free from bias,
which is the space the media would have us believe they occupy. The nonpartisan is never to be questioned. His
motives are beyond reproach. Most important, the nonpartisan always, without fail, will support the Democrats'
argument. Because if he doesn't, then he is obviously a covert Republican, and, in that case, he just gets treated like
every other Republican. Mr. Kroll treats the "nonpartisan" Wisconsin Election Commission (WEC) official Meagan
Wolfe this way by saying she has spent her entire career in election integrity. In relaying a conversation he had with
a Republican attorney named Richard Heuer, he says Heuer "called its nonpartisan administrator, Meagan Wolfe, a 'very
dangerous person.'" Heuer didn't say Wolfe is "nonpartisan" — that is Mr. Kroll telling his audience that,
so they know that Wolfe is beyond question. Heuer is a Republican and therefore not to be trusted. And since
Heuer can't be trusted, the "nonpartisan" election official can't be "dangerous."
We're
Witnessing The Death Of American Journalism. Last Friday, Rolling Stone magazine carried a story based on
remarks that Dr. Jason McElyea made to a local station. He claimed that hospitals in Oklahoma were swarmed with
patients overdosing on Ivermectin, causing other patients, such as gunshot victims, to be neglected. Predictably Rachel
Maddow and her myriad comrades on the left gleefully amplified this story on social media. (Drew Holden comprehensively
chronicled this on Twitter.) The Guardian, Insider, Newsweek, and many other news outlets also carried the story.
The propaganda balloon bulged so much that this became a national, perhaps even global story. Fortunately, the pin of
facts popped the balloon before it could bloat any further. [...] It must be remembered that, back in 2014, Rolling Stone
magazine carried a story about the horrifying account of a gang rape at the University of Virginia student campus fraternity
house. The story turned out to be false. The magazine then retracted the story and apologized to readers and "all
of those who were damaged by our story and the ensuing fallout". An investigation found Rolling Stone magazine guilty of
defamation over a false article. The magazine ended up paying $1.65 million to the University of Virginia fraternity
over the discredited rape story.
Media's
ivermectin hit piece totally debunked after hospital says no overdoses from the medicine. When an Oklahoma
doctor told the media horror stories about hospitals jammed with patients who self-medicated themselves with ivermectin right
into the emergency room, it was a hit. Rolling Stone ran with choice bits of the story, which appears to have
originated with Oklahoma TV station KFOR-TV. "The ERs are so backed up that gunshot victims were having hard times
getting to facilities where they can get definitive care and be treated," Dr. Jason McElyea said. But the
bombshell report soon went bust. The doctor who offered a graphic depiction of chaos had not been on the job for a
while, and the hospital where he worked said there was no truth to the claim that ivermectin patients were crowding out
everyone else.
Rolling
Stone's ivermectin fiction shows why Republicans don't trust media. If you want to know why Republicans have no
faith in news organizations, look no further than the Rolling Stone story shared liberally across Twitter this weekend
claiming that Oklahoma hospitals were turning away gunshot victims because they were overwhelmed by "horse dewormer
overdoses." Headlined "Gunshot Victims Left Waiting as Horse Dewormer Overdoses Overwhelm Oklahoma Hospitals, Doctor
Says," the Rolling Stone story, written by Peter Wade, quoted a Dr. Jason McElyea who claimed, "The ERs are so
backed up that gunshot victims were having hard times getting to facilities where they can get definitive care and be
treated." McElyea blamed the lack of hospital beds on an influx of patients who had taken ivermectin to counteract
COVID-19 symptoms. Despite the drug's long history of successful prescribed use in human patients, the online left has
taken to calling the Nobel Prize-winning drug a "horse dewormer."
We've got to talk about
the Rolling Stone invermectin article. [Thread reader] Turns out the story about rural hospitals so flooded
with ODs that they couldn't treat other patients was made up, entirely invented. A lot of people took the bait, and
I've got the screenshots. [Tweet] But it wasn't just a single story out in the ether. Plenty of other
places picked up the story, too, with no additional sourcing or research. [...] But the real champion of this tall tale was
MSNBC. [Rachel Maddow] had a tweet about it that went viral. She's got an audience of millions of people and
couldn't be bothered to even look into a story that pretty obviously doesn't pass the sniff test.
No,
Ivermectin Overdoses Didn't Overwhelm Oklahoma Hospitals And Force Gunshot Victims To Wait. A story circulating
social media on Saturday — thanks to it being picked up by Rolling Stone and Rachel Maddow — claimed
that hospitals in Oklahoma have been overwhelmed with people overdosing on horse dewormer, leaving gunshot victims in the
lurch. The story on its face was absurd, yet multiple media outlets pushed the claim, based on the word of a single
doctor who gave an interview to KFOR. That doctor, Jason McElyea, claimed that the emergency rooms in Oklahoma "are so backed
up that gunshot victims were having hard times getting to facilities where they can get definitive care and be treated."
'Not An
Employee': Hospital Blows Holes In Rolling Stone Story. Rolling Stone magazine has been called out for
publishing an inaccurate story Saturday [9/4/2021] about hospitals in Oklahoma being overrun by Ivermectin overdoses.
The Rolling Stone story reported that the number of Ivermectin drug overdoses have so overwhelmed hospitals that gunshot
victims have been unable to get medical treatment. Ivermectin is an anti-parasitic drug that has a human version but is
more commonly used for deworming livestock. In an interview with local Southeastern Oklahoma station KFOR, a rural
Oklahoma physician Dr. Jason McElyea spread many of the same falsehoods. "The ERs are so backed up that gunshot
victims were having hard times getting to facilities where they can get definitive care and be treated," he said. "All
of their ambulances are stuck at the hospital waiting for a bed to open so they can take the patient in and they don't have
any, that's it," said Dr. McElyea. "If there's no ambulance to take the call, there's no ambulance to come to the
call." In response to that interview and the Rolling Stone piece, the Northeastern Health System (NHS) Sequoyah released
a statement claiming Dr. Jason McElyea "is not an employee of NHS Sequoyah", he also hasn't worked at that hospital in
over two months nor have they treated any patients for Ivermectin overdoses.
Hospital
Statement Calls Out Ivermectin 'Fake News' That Was Spread by Rachel Maddow. Rachel Maddow is no stranger to
fake news. But the MSNBC host's wild conspiracy theories and inaccurate reporting has typically revolved around
political gossip, Capitol Hill intrigue, and a chronic case of Trump Derangement Syndrome. On Saturday [9/4/2021],
however, the MSNBC host's personal Twitter account amplified a local tall tale about the drug Ivermectin, which has
progressives throwing a tizzy over anecdotal cases that it may have helped some people recover from Covid. (Joe Rogan
being the case in point.) Maddow took the local story and blew it up into a national one. [Tweet] "Patients
overdosing on ivermectin backing up rural Oklahoma hospitals, ambulances," Maddow quoted from a local news article. "'The
scariest one I've heard of and seen is people coming in with vision loss.' he said." The news article itself gives off
signals right away that it is not a legitimate source of information. "A rural Oklahoma doctor said patients who are
taking the horse de-wormer medication, ivermectin, to fight COVID-19 are causing emergency room and ambulance back ups,"
News 4 reported on Friday.
From
Rathergate to Rolling Stone: Fake But Accurate. Rathergate has many similarities to
the Rolling Stone rape hoax. Both ignored the basic rules of journalism to pursue a narrative.
The narrative was so full of holes that bloggers and even casual readers realized that something was
wrong and stepped in where the professional journalists had failed. The difference is that
Rolling Stone has even less investment in its journalistic credibility than CBS did. The
principals will not be forced out. Their work may have been fake, but it was still accurate.
How
Deep Is This Education Official's Involvement In The Rolling Stone Hoax? A top-ranking
official at the U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights has emerged as a potentially
key figure in Rolling Stone's false article, "A Rape on Campus." Catherine Lhamon, who heads the
Department's civil rights wing, was identified in a letter sent last month by University of Virginia
Dean of Students Allen Groves to Steve Coll and Sheila Coronel, the two Columbia Journalism School
deans who conducted a review of the Nov. 19 article, written by disgraced reporter Sabrina Rubin
Erdely. Groves' letter was included as a footnote to the Columbia deans' report, which was
released on Sunday and cataloged the failures and lies that led to the article's publication.
Has
the Rolling Stone gang-rape author EVER corroborated a story? In the wake of Rolling
Stone's refusal to fire the author behind its now-retracted and now infamous University of Virginia
gang-rape story, one has to wonder if this is a rare mistake or a pattern of behavior. There are
some big hints that it is the latter. Sabrina Rubin Erdely, the author in question, actually has a
history of writing articles based solely on one person's account, with no indication that she even tried
to corroborate the story or hear any other potential side.
'Rolling
Stone' didn't let facts block story. The best thing you can say about this fiasco is
that there was little deliberate lying involved. According to an exhaustive report by the Columbia
Journalism School, the article's author, Sabrina Rubin Erdely, and her editors didn't purposefully publish
falsehoods. Of course, this is faint praise. The field of journalistic ethics can get ridiculously
Talmudic. But it's all based on a very simple rule: Tell the truth.
Why the Left Lies.
There was only one problem with Erdely's story: It was false. Jackie had lied. And Rolling Stone had
no evidence to back up Jackie's story in the first place. This week, Rolling Stone apologized for the story but
did not fire Erdely or any of its editors; Erdely apologized not to the fraternity or its members but to virtually
everyone else. She added, "In writing each of these stories I must weigh my compassion against my journalistic
duty to find the truth." Herein lies the problem. Journalism does not require sympathy for human beings.
It requires sympathy for readers, who deserve truth. But for the left, truth represents a secondary value.
It is far more important to forward a particular political narrative than it is to simply state the facts. And
that narrative can only be forwarded if there is controversy over the facts.
Fighting
Against 'Rape Culture' Means Never Having to Say You're Sorry. The extensive post
mortem that Rolling Stone commissioned in the wake of Sabrina Rubin Erdely's now infamous
"Rape on Campus" disaster rests upon — and confirms — two salient facts. The
first: that Erdely did not receive her story from a source and then contrive to write it up, but instead
went looking for a tale that would help her to advance a political narrative. The second: that
Rolling Stone's editorial process broke down almost entirely, thereby permitting her shoddy
workmanship to reach the international stage.
Rolling
Stone, media bias, and how the left uses fake victims to create real ones. Hey,
remember that Rolling Stone article about the brutal gang on the campus of the University of
Virginia that never happened? Well, Rolling Stone is officially retracting the story. [...] But
here's the thing: This is mission accomplished for progressives. When it comes to something
like this, Rolling Stone (and others) is much less concerned about honesty in journalism than it is activism
through journalism. It's all about the narrative. I don't mean to suggest that the writer of this
piece wanted the humiliation associated with writing an inaccurate piece. I'm saying that she didn't
bother to even question Jackie's story because it fit her progressive, victim/oppressor worldview perfectly.
Rolling
Stone's Fake Rape Piece Shows Media's Culture Of Corruption. What does a magazine
caught in a scandal too awful to defend do? Why, go to Columbia's journalism school for absolution.
That's what Rolling Stone did after its false campus rape story. It won't work this time.
'Hitler
Made a Difference': The Liberal Gang Rape of Journalism. What percentage of the news
reporting staff at NBC, ABC, CBS or CNN voted for Mitt Romney in 2012? What percentage of the
editors at the New York Times, the Washington Post, or the Associated Press have ever
voted for any Republican? For most members of the modern media, the news business has ceased to be a
business and is no longer about news. Instead, journalism has become a sort of missionary field for
political zealots engaged in an evangelical crusade for what Ann Coulter called "The Church of Liberalism."
Young liberals become journalists for the same reason others go to work for UNICEF or the Peace Corps, because
they want to "make a difference." Liberal journalists conceive of their careers as a sacred calling, to
assist the forces of "progress" in creating a world of "social justice."
'Hitler
Made a Difference': The Liberal Gang Rape of Journalism. Rolling Stone magazine
perpetrated a hoax against the University of Virginia, doing "journalism" about an alleged gang rape
that evidently never happened. The source of the dramatic tale Rolling Stone published last
November, "A Rape on Campus," was a UVA student named Jackie who has been proven to be a liar. [...]
What better way to exploit the political "gender gap" than to claim that college girls are being
raped en masse, and then to suggest that the solution to this problem could be summarized in two
words: "VOTE DEMOCRAT!"
UVA
Frat Has Powerful Legal Case Against Rolling Stone. On Monday [4/6/2015], the
University of Virginia's Phi Kappa Psi fraternity announced it would investigate a lawsuit against
Rolling Stone after the magazine's massive "Rape on Campus" expose turned out to have been
based completely on a fraudulent story.
What
Columbia Missed In Its Review of Rolling Stone. In November, Rolling
Stone magazine ran a story detailing the horrific account of an alleged gang rape at a
fraternity on the University of Virginia campus. The story quickly proved to be rubbish, and
Rolling Stone reached out to the Columbia University School of Journalism to discover how the
magazine could have blundered so badly. [...] As I document in my forthcoming book, Scarlet
Letters, cases like the Rolling Stone's have become so common because those perpetrating
a given fraud almost inevitably advance causes that the cultural establishment, the Columbia faculty
included, wants to see advanced.
Here
Are Eight Campus Rape Hoaxes Eerily Like The UVA Rape Story. In a now-infamous Nov. 19
story in Rolling Stone, disgraced journalist Sabrina Rubin Erdely asserted that at least five
members of the Phi Kappa Psi fraternity gang-raped a freshman named Jackie at a frat house party,
then left her in a bloodstained dress to exit via a conveniently vacant side staircase. The
Washington Post's reporting now suggests that Jackie fabricated huge swathes of her gory rape tale,
and that Erdely abrogated her duty to properly investigate it. Erdely's career is rapidly
disintegrating with each freshly revealed fabrication, as it becomes more and more evident that no
rape occurred.
Politico
Six
takeaways from Trump's stunning win over Harris. Donald Trump didn't just complete a
once-unlikely political comeback — he won a resounding victory despite legal jeopardy,
the unpopular end of federal abortion rights and rhetoric that repelled broad segments of the
electorate. Kamala Harris lost to Trump in stunning fashion, just as Hillary Clinton, the
first woman to be her party's presidential nominee, did in 2016. The former president built a
more diverse coalition of voters than any Republican nominee in 20 years, despite running a
racially charged, testosterone-soaked campaign that demonized immigrants.
The Editor says...
That's where I stopped reading, reasonably sure that the rest of the article was similarly biased and
dishonest. Harris lost "in stunning fashion" only if you believe the unrealistic polls
conducted by the same sort of "journalists" who wrote the article above. Trump did not run a
"racially charged" campaign, except to point out to minority voters that their habitual support of
the Democratic Party over the last 60 years has got them nowhere. If a
"testosterone-soaked campaign" succeeded, maybe that's what most voters are looking for, as an
antidote to drag queens in the public library, tampons in the boys' restrooms at school, sex-change
operations for little kids, and abortion on demand at any stage of pregnancy — or
shortly afterward. Trump's campaign did not demonize immigrants, except the ones who are
present in this country illegally, many of them violent criminals (e.g., MS-13), or possibly Chinese
soldiers, and many of them carrying infectious diseases that will have to be addressed at U.S. taxpayers'
expense. Objecting to the socialist Democrats' plan to allow non-citizens to vote is not "demoniz[ing]
immigrants." Let the mass deportation begin! And if you claimed you would leave the country
if Trump was elected, start packing.
FEMA
Says "Disinformation" is a Problem — What Disinformation? The Disinformation About
the Information. Politico has written an article about FEMA Administrator Deanne
Criswell, saying disinformation about the federal government response to Hurricane Helene, "is
absolutely the worst I have ever seen," Criswell told reporters on a Tuesday morning call.
"It's creating distrust in the federal government, but also the state government, and we have so
many first responders that have been working to go out and help these communities," she
added. However, if you go read the article fraught with pearl-clutching and protestation, you
might curiously discover there is not a single citation for any claimed "disinformation." It
is very odd to see FEMA and by extension Politico in their defense, claiming that massive
disinformation is running rampant, and yet they do not cite a single example of the disinformation
they claim to exist.
Media can sure pick them.
On July July 22, Politico reported, "With Biden out, Vance may be the wrong pick for Trump.
"The former president has an electability problem among women, and his pick for vice president
only compounds it." Yes, because women dislike young, good-looking, blue-eyed men with trim
beards and trim bodies. The column also said, "Overall, women voters turned out at higher
rates than men in 2022, with participation especially high in some key states like Arizona,
Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, which are likely to determine the result of the 2024
presidential race as well. And that year, 12 states elected women governors —
a record number." Ah, so 2024 is the Year of the Woman in politics as it has been every year
since 1984 when Walter Mondale chose Geraldine Ferraro as his running mate. On July 25,
out of the people in the universe, Newsweek (and Fox News and CNN) chose Anthony Scaramucci to
speak for the Republican Party.
The
Myth That Biden Had Nothing to Do with the Prosecutions of Trump. [Scroll down]
Politico has long prided itself on its supposed insider knowledge of the workings of the
Biden administration. Note that it was reported earlier this February that a frustrated Joe
Biden "has grumbled to aides and advisers that had Garland moved sooner in his investigation into
former President Donald Trump's election interference, a trial may already be underway or even have
concluded..." [Advertisement] If there was any doubt about the Biden administration's
effort to force Trump into court before November, Politico further dispelled it —
even as it blamed Trump for Biden's anger at Garland: "That trial still could take place before
the election and much of the delay is owed not to Garland but to deliberate resistance put up by
the former president and his team." Note in passing how a presidential candidate's legal right
to oppose a politicized indictment months before an election by his opponent's federal attorneys is
smeared by Politico as "deliberate resistance."
The
border deal trap is out in the open, and desperate Democrats are lying to blame the
GOP. The nation's socialist media has made it plain that they hope to pin the migrant
crisis they helped create on President Trump and the GOP. [...] Early on Monday morning, Politico,
one of the left's go-to propaganda publications posted a story called "Playbook: Can Dems
flip the border script?" wish-casting the hopes and dreams of 'Democrats' everywhere in flipping
the script (read: lying) about the border crisis they created. Using all of their media
muscle, they are trying to create an alternate reality in which Trump, who isn't even in the White
House, somehow caused the crisis.
Migrants
fall victim to NIMBYism as states struggle with influx. Democratic strongholds are struggling
to keep helping the surge of migrants in their cities and states — and it's sparking anxiety in the
party about potential fallout heading into the 2024 election cycle. New York Mayor Eric Adams'
tussle with the White House over an influx of migrants from red states has famously soured his
relationship with President Joe Biden. But he's far from the only blue state official pushing
back, as public pressure and budget concerns rise in Illinois, Massachusetts and beyond.
The Editor says...
Politico seems to have forgotten about the origins of "Sanctuary Cities." It was not a Republican idea.
The Republicans aren't the ones who eliminated the enforcement of the southern border.
Politico
Hit Piece on Clarence Thomas Goes Horribly Wrong. Earlier this week, Politico made a horrible attempt to
attack Justice Clarence Thomas in a hastily written "fact-check" that turned out to be false. According to Politico,
Thomas claimed that COVID-19 vaccines were developed from cells from aborted children, a claim Politico insisted was
false. "They object on religious grounds to all available COVID-19 vaccines because they were developed using cell
lines derived from aborted children," Thomas said in a quote cited by Politico. In response to this claim,
Politico insisted, "None of the Covid-19 vaccines in the United States contain the cells of aborted fetuses." There
were, however, two problems with this so-called fact check. First, Thomas didn't actually make the statement.
Politico eventually learned this and issued a correction.
So
abortion restrictions could now damage the economy? Politico recently published what other media outlets have
called a "bombshell leak," that being Justice Alito's draft opinion indicating that the Supreme Court may be about to
overturn Roe v. Wade as soon as this summer. Much has been made of both the leak and the opinion, which have sent
leftists and "progressives" into paroxysms of despair, anger, violence and insanity. This including vows to disrupt
masses at Catholic churches on Mother's Day. Just the kind of class and dignity you can depend on from them.
The
Real Crisis Is the Media's Disregard for Facts and Truth. Two different topics, but the same problem: [#1]
There is no crisis at the border. [#2] And "authorities say (Ma'Khia Bryant) was wielding a knife." Thus reported,
successively, Politico and NBC News produced two vivid examples of exactly why millions of Americans no longer trust the
mainstream liberal media. [...] Mind you, the video of this incident was everywhere. There, quite clearly, was Bryant,
with knife in hand, quite obviously and visibly preparing to stab another black teenage girl with a considerably-sized knife,
her hand raised for the strike. For NBC to say police were "saying she was threatening others with a knife" when, quite
obviously, there she was on video with knife in hand, was a preposterous omission.
Politico
reporter urges journalists to drop 'conservative,' switch to 'extremist'. Journalists have one job: to
fairly and accurately report the news. But, in today's climate, many do quite the opposite. The left-wing media
conglomerate works tirelessly to put Democrats on a pedestal, all while making republicans look like eternal villains.
Now, a top Politico reporter is calling on his fellow journalists to stop referring to republicans as
conservatives. Instead, refer to them as "extremists."
Politico
Drops a Supposed Presidency-Crushing Bombshell On Trump, Then the Facts Came Out. Isn't it amazing how these
"mistakes" always go one way? Politico put a piece out yesterday in which they made quite the stunning charge against
Donald Trump. According to their sources, the President is hopelessly stuck under the thumb of China because he owes
their state bank tens of millions of dollars. Sounds bad, right? Here's some guy from The Washington Post pushing
the story in a thread. [Tweet] I won't bore you with the rest of his preening, as it's what you'd expect, i.e. lots
of false conclusions being drawn from incomplete evidence. The point of Politico's story was to take heat off Joe
Biden, as the above thread and the article itself draw comparisons to Hunter Biden.
The media
has officially lost its mind. [Scroll down] Meanwhile, Politico was sticking with a bonkers attempt to
make a scandal out of Air Force members paying a cheap $130 a night to stay at a Trump resort in Scotland called Turnberry
while they were refueling their planes at a nearby airport Trump does not own or profit from. Politico solemnly
reported that "up to 6 percent" of Air Force members had stayed at the Trump property while refueling at the airport.
So the resort is affordable, service members have been staying there since the Obama years and at least 94 percent of those
staying in the area stay at some other hotel. Politico tried to frame this as a violation of the Emoluments Clause that
forbids presidents from cashing in on their position while in office. That doesn't pass the laugh test.
Jeffrey Epstein
Fallout Shows How Little Trust Americans Have in Media and Government. [Scroll down] From assuring us the
Trump campaign colluded with the Russians to influence the outcome of the 2016 election to reporting every unproven
allegation of rape against Brett Kavanaugh, Politico and its brethren have fueled this crisis of confidence.
Pro-life high schoolers wearing Make America Great Again hats were "mocking" and "laughing at" a Native American elder, the
media told us. Hillary Clinton will win the presidency. The stock market will tank after Trump is elected.
Donald Trump won't serve a full term. White supremacy is on the rise and poses a greater threat to national security
that Islamic extremism because Trump and Republicans are using special "code words" to fan the flames of racism. There
is no national emergency at the southern border. The Trump Administration is the first to lock migrant children "in
cages." That is only a partial list of falsehoods, flat-out lies and legitimate conspiracies that the untrustworthy
folks who populate our once respected institutions have told us in the past three years.
Politico
Wrongly Tried to Claim a Pastor Apologized for Praying for President Trump. I won't blame Krystal Campos, the
reporter, because I don't know if she gets to assign her own titles. But it is pretty shocking that anyone could read
David Platt's letter to his congregation and take it as an apology. All he did was explain to the congregation how it
came to be that the President showed up unexpectedly.
Liberal
Journalists Falsely Accuse Jeff Sessions of Calling Illegal Immigrants 'Filth'. Liberal journalists on Twitter
falsely accused Attorney General Jeff Sessions of calling illegal immigrants "filth" in a speech he delivered on the Mexican
border Tuesday [4/11/2017]. Politico reporter Josh Dawsey took a partial quote from a Wall Street Journal story on
Sessions' speech out of context, tweeting that Sessions described illegal immigrants as filth. From there, it caught
the eye of Tufts professor and writer of the Washington Post's Spoiler Alerts blog Daniel Drezner, and the
misinterpretation spread throughout Twitter.
Is
the Media Too Comfortable with Its Own Mistakes? In November, New York magazine excitedly reported on
the claims of computer scientists that "results in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania may have been manipulated or
hacked." No credible evidence of hacking was ever presented. In December, Politico reported that the bank of
Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin had "foreclosed on a 90-year-old woman after a 27-cent payment error," a claim widely
repeated in publications such as Vanity Fair. As the Competitive Enterprise Institute's Ted Frank pointed out, the
"widow was never foreclosed on and never lost her home, and it wasn't Mnuchin's bank that brought the suit." Seven hate
crimes widely reported after the 2016 election turned out to be hoaxes. Do members of the media feel bad when they get
facts wrong or gullibly repeat implausible claims? Guilty? Angry at themselves? Do they resolve to do
better next time?
Fake
News: Politico Scrubs Soros Ties to Anti-Trump Group Trying to Mobilize Nationwide Protests. A Politico
profile of a new anti-Trump protest movement calling itself "Indivisible" reported that "conservatives" are "spreading
unfounded rumors" that the group is "being driven by wealthy donors like George Soros." Politico, however, seemingly
failed to do even the most minimal research on the Indivisible leaders cited in the news outlet's own profile. Some of
those personalities are openly associated with groups financed by Soros.
Lies my Politico
told me. After feeding the story line for the last two years that Trump was not a serious candidate, Politico
is now pretending that he spent eighteen months of his life and $100 million to win an office he did not want.
Politicians,
press pile on Politico. Reporters and politicians ripped into Politico for publishing a story Friday saying Ben
Carson "fabricated" a story about being offered a full scholarship to attend West Point. But even before this criticism
started, Republican front-runner Donald Trump had already declared war on the Virginia-based news outlet's editorial standards,
saying last week that it is "the dumbest and most slanted" site that he has ever encountered.
Politico Admits Fabricating A Hit Piece On Ben Carson.
There were at least five major problems with the story:
• The headline was completely false
• The subhed was also completely false
• The opening paragraph was false false false
• The substance of the piece was missing key exonerating information
• The article demonstrated confusion about service academy admissions and benefits
How
the MSM spins, example #926: Politico provides Team Hillary a talking point. The State Department, before releasing one of the
emails Hillary funneled through her homebrew server, failed to redact the name of somebody who is (or was) a CIA source. The House Benghazi
Committee later made that email public after it was cleared by State. If you're among the left-leaning the MSM, how do you spin that?
State
Department Screws Up, Politico Blames Trey Gowdy For Some Reason. That's weird; if Republican Congressman Trey
Gowdy accidentally released CIA information, why is the State Department apologizing? The story here is that the State
Department admitted they made a mistake in redacting a series of Clinton emails the Benghazi Committee planned to release.
But despite the State Department admitting that they screwed up and left in the name of a CIA source, Politico's headline
is that Gowdy "accidentally released" it[,] even though he got the okay from the State Department to release the emails.
Politico: Media Didn't
Ignore Benghazi. Politico's Dylan Byers, in a piece for his buddies in the MSM, declares that conservative criticism of the mainstream
media is overblown. [...] Let us enlighten Byers to the scope of the MSM's betrayal of the public trust, with some added help from the Media Research
Council.
Politico
Quietly Edits Story Claiming Tea Party Supports Immigration Bill. Politico deceptively edited its lead story from
Tuesday, "Immigration's new ally: Tea partiers" that originally erroneously argued the Tea Party was an "ally" of the "Gang of
Eight" immigration bill. The changes came after Breitbart News caught the site red-handed in a number of factual errors.
Politico made several substantive changes to its piece and the only notification it gave to readers of those corrections was an
updated time stamp next to the authors' bylines.
The
new oil crisis: exploding trains. Communities throughout the U.S. and Canada are
waking up to the dark side of North America's energy boom: Trains hauling crude oil are crashing,
exploding and spilling in record numbers as a fast-growing industry outpaces the federal government's oversight.
The Editor says...
The article immediately above is one of those "We need more legislation" commercial for Big Government. Big Oil is
outrunning "the federal government's oversight." Railroad companies apparently don't care if trains derail,
you see, but if the government takes over, there will never be another train wreck.
Katie Couric
Katie
Couric Beats Defamation Lawsuit Over Gun Documentary. A Virginia judge has just shot down a $13 million lawsuit
against Katie Couric, Stephanie Soechtig, Epix and others associated with the documentary Under the Gun. The film, which
premiered at the Sundance Film Festival in January, provoked controversy because of one scene in particular. In it, Couric asks
gun rights advocates, "If there are no background checks for gun purchasers, how do you prevent felons or terrorists from purchasing
a gun?" Under the Gun shows those being interviewed in nine seconds of silence.
The
Three Abortion Amigas: Couric, Richards, Adichie Make Utter Fools of Themselves. Former morning host,
failed news anchor, and now self-styled independent journalist Katie Couric has always been a fierce supporter of legalized
child killing in the United States. According to colleagues, she even hung a picture of Planned Parenthood's notorious
racist and eugenicist founder Margaret Sanger in her CBS News office. So it should have been altogether unsurprising to
see Couric take advantage of some event called Women in the World Summit to promote and endorse radical author Chimamanda
Adichie and Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards.
Scandal Plagued News Anchor Katie
Couric Will Return to 'Today' Show. Katie Couric, the scandal-plagued Yahoo News correspondent and former
celebrity news anchor, will return to NBC's "Today" show in January. Couric will guest-host alongside Matt Lauer, also
a figure of some controversy, for one week beginning January 2.
Desperate
Katie Couric Files to Dismiss $12M Defamation Case. Director Stephanie Soechtig and Producer Katie Couric were
caught red-handed fabricating gun owner responses in their anti-gun propaganda film, Under the Gun, leading member of
the Virginia Citizens Defense League (VDCL) to file a $12 million dollar defamation lawsuit. Couric's lawyers are
now desperately attempting to have the case thrown out.
Katie
Couric, Stephanie Soechtig sued for $12M for deceptive edits in anti-gun documentary. A Virginia gun-rights
group is suing Katie Couric and the producers of the documentary "Under the Gun" for $12 million in defamation over an
interview that was revealed to have been deceptively edited. The Virginia Citizens Defense League (VCDL) and two
gun-rights activists featured in the film, Daniel Hawes and Patricia Webb, are suing Ms. Couric, who produced the
documentary and led the interview in question, as well as director Stephanie Soechtig, Atlas Films and Epix, the film's
distributor. The suit filed in federal court Tuesday, obtained by BearingArms.com, claimed the producers of the film
"intentionally manipulated" footage to make it look like members of the VCDL were stumped when asked about gun background checks.
Politics,
Porn and Gun Nuts. Katie Couric was the anchor for a while on "CBS Evening News" and was a correspondent on the
investigation program "60 Minutes." She was a star. She's fallen far. But she fell gradually, and there
were signs along the way. [...] Couric's recent spectacle suggests that the sleaze hasn't bottomed out yet. Couric's
purported story was an interview with several Second Amendment advocates. You know, gun owners. Or as people who
don't own guns call them, "gun nuts." Whether or not you agree with them, these gun owners/nuts in Couric's interview
come across as rational and well-spoken. Too much so, Couric evidently decided. So she fixed that.
Forget
Manipulative Editing — Katie Couric's Team Likely Violated Federal Law. The plot thickens. A
couple of weeks ago, it was reported that Stephanie Soechtig, the director of a Katie Couric-fronted gun-control infomercial
titled Under the Gun, had selectively edited her interviewees' testimony in order to make them look dumb. Now,
it seems that Soechtig and her team may have bigger problems than having been caught in a lie: One or more among them
may be heading toward a felony charge. During a recent television interview, Soechtig claimed indignantly that she had
sent a co-producer from Colorado into the state of Arizona, where he made contact with a private gun seller and purchased
three handguns and a "Bushmaster" rifle. According to Soechtig, that these transactions were "perfectly legal"
demonstrates that the laws need changing.
Katie
Couric Accused of Deceptive Editing in Second Documentary. Katie Couric's 2014 documentary Fed Up
includes instances of deceptive editing similar to 2016's Under the Gun, according to several people familiar with the
making of the film. Fed Up, which focuses on obesity and the food industry, was directed by Stephanie Soechtig and
produced by Couric. The film includes two interviews with figures who hold viewpoints counter to the narrative of the film,
and sources say both interviews include at least one misleading or deceptive edit intended to embarrass the interviewee.
Dr. David Allison, an interview subject in the film and the director of the Nutrition Obesity Research Center, says he was a
victim of shoddy journalism. "What she did to me is antithetical to not only just human decency and civility but it is
antithetical to the spirit of science and democratic dialogue," he told the Washington Free Beacon.
Yahoo
caught off guard by Katie Couric documentary scandal. News industry veterans are sniping that Yahoo was caught
seriously off guard by Katie Couric's dodgy editing scandal. Company insiders reveal that an emergency meeting of
senior executives was rapidly convened after it emerged that eight seconds of silence had been added to an interview in her
documentary "Under the Gun" — which she made outside of her Yahoo role — making it seem as if
anti-gun-control activists were stumped by a question. But Yahoo didn't launch a formal investigation into why their
"global anchor" ended up having to publicly apologize for the misleading footage. Couric said in a statement that she
had asked director Stephanie Soechtig about why she had inserted the silence, and added, "I regret that those eight seconds
were misleading and that I did not raise my initial concerns more vigorously."
Putting
the media 'under the gun'. [Scroll down] It's hard to know what is worse: "clueless reporters" being
manipulated by government officials to spread propaganda, or deceptive reporters manipulating video to spread their own
propaganda? In the latter category, we have the aforementioned Katie Couric documentary which infamously tried to make
gun-rights advocates look like they were totally stumped by Couric's "hard-line" questioning.
Harrington,
Reliable Sources Panel Slam Couric for Misleading Gun Documentary. CNN media show Reliable Sources covered
Katie Couric's deceptively edited gun documentary Sunday [6/5/2016], with Washington Free Beacon reporter Elizabeth
Harrington and the rest of the panel unanimously condemning Couric and the movie's director for their conduct. Couric
has come under fire after the Washington Free Beacon revealed the documentary she narrated and produced, Under The
Gun, contains a falsely edited scene where Couric appears to stump gun rights activists with a question about background
checks. Reporter Stephen Gutowski broke the story last month, showing with audio that the gun rights activists actually
immediately responded to Couric's question, rather than staring in silence as the movie falsely shows. "Eight seconds
of silence, making the activists look ignorant, like they didn't have an answer, but the truth is they responded to her
question right away," Reliable Sources host Brian Stelter said.
Gun
Group Calls for Investigation Into Producers of 'Under the Gun'. The National Shooting Sports Foundation, a
prominent gun rights group, is calling for an investigation into whether the producers of Under the Gun violated laws
governing interstate firearm sales. According to Under the Gun director Stephanie Soechtig in a February interview
first unearthed by the website Ammoland, a producer who resided in Colorado was sent to Arizona to purchase a rifle and
three handguns from private sellers in the state.
Katie
Couric's Anti-Gun Producers Repeatedly Violated Federal Gun Laws. Katie, get your gun lawyer. By now
you've probably heard about Katie Couric's new anti-gun documentary "Under The Gun," and how her producer doctored video of
interviews with gun owners in order to make them look stupid and heartless. Couric's producer and director, Stephanie
Soechtig, admitted to doctoring the video, and Couric herself kinda sorta apologized for it. But that's not the worst
thing that happened with the making of this documentary. It turns out that Couric's production team deliberately
conspired to violate federal gun laws. According to video obtained by Ammoland, a shooting sports news website, one of
Couric's producers deliberately committed at least four separate felonies by purchasing four separate firearms across state
lines without a background check.
Gun
group won't accept Katie Couric 'apology'. Katie Couric may have claimed responsibility for a doctored
interview with a pro-Second Amendment group, but the gun rights activists targeted in her documentary are angry her
mea culpa included only a partial transcript of their discussion on background checks.
Katie
Couric slammed for 'deceptive' documentary about gun rights. The Independent Women's Forum issued a statement
on Wednesday calling for Couric to be fired. "Katie Couric should be ashamed of herself for her dishonest and distorted
reporting on this issue," said Culture of Alarmism Director Julie Gunlock. "She has gone from respected journalist to
propagandist for gun control groups... Like serial fabricator Brian Williams, Couric should be fired. Her tactics
have been exposed and Americans should never again trust her to report on these important issues."
Katie
Couric takes blame for 'misleading' gap edited into gun documentary. Katie Couric has reversed course and taken
responsibility for an edit that misrepresents the response of gun rights activists to a question she poses in a new
documentary. The segment in "Under the Gun" shows nearly 10 seconds of silence after Couric asks the activists how
felons or terrorists could be prevented from purchasing a gun without background checks. Audio of the exchange leaked
last week reveals an almost immediate response to the question.
First
Couric, Now Gumbel Accused of Deceptive Edits in Anti-Gun Segment. They once shared co-hosting duties on NBC's
Today show and now it looks like Bryant Gumbel has joined Katie Couric in being accused of using deceptive editing
techniques to attack gun rights. The inventor of the AR-15 rifle, Jim Sullivan, has attacked HBO's Real Sports with
Bryant Gumbel for misrepresenting "much of what I had said" in his interview for their anti-gun segment aired on the May 24
program. Sullivan, in a May 31 article for The Federalist, charged that the anti-gun segment (by Real Sports
correspondent David Scott and producers Chapman Downes and Katie Melone) tried "to make the AR-15 civilian model seem too dangerous
for civilian sales. They didn't lie about what I said, they just omitted key parts, which changed the meaning."
Couric
Apologizes: 'I Take Responsibility' for 'Misleading' Documentary Edit. In a statement issued Sunday [5/29/2016], Yahoo News
anchor and executive producer of the documentary Under the Gun Katie Couric apologized for a "misleading" edit that appeared in that
film. Couric asked a pro-gun rights Virginia group how guns could be kept out of the hands of felons and terrorists without background
checks. In the edited version seen in the film, the group does not answer for several seconds and stares at their knees. But
when the gun group in question released their own recording, they showed that they were not dumbstruck and immediately gave lucid answers.
The Editor says...
The lesson here is very clear: When you are interviewed by a television reporter, make your own recording of the interview,
preferably with a time code track to validate your counter-claims, weeks or months later.
Epix
Removes Katie Couric Documentary From Its Website. The cable network behind the Katie Couric-produced documentary
Under the Gun has pulled the film from its website a day after Couric apologized and admitted it contained a misleading
edit of gun proponents' remarks. Pro-gun blog BearingArms.com first noticed that attempting to watch the film now
brings up a message saying "This movie is not currently playing on Epix."
Gun-documentary
director shows no remorse for deceptive, demeaning edit. Katie Couric, the executive producer and narrator of
the Epix-distributed documentary "Under the Gun," has apologized for a deliberate and deceptive edit that makes a group of
gun rights advocates look like dumbfounded dolts. In a statement posted over Memorial Day weekend, Couric acknowledged
that the edit was "misleading" and that she had failed to forcefully press her initial concerns about it. For the
record, the edit in question misportrayed an exchange between Couric and members of the Virginia Citizens Defense
League. In response to a question about background checks, VCDL members are depicted in stunned silence for about eight
seconds. An audiotape recorded by VCDL President Philip Van Cleave showed that Couric's inquiry fetched an immediate
and quite reasonable response.
Katie
Couric Finally Apologizes For Her Fraudulent Anti-Gun Documentary. Katie Couric apologized and accepted
responsibility for misrepresenting gun rights activists in her upcoming documentary "Under the Gun," Monday [5/30/2016].
"I take responsibility for a decision that misrepresented an exchange I had with members of the Virginia Citizens Defense League,"
Couric said in a statement. The Global News anchor for Yahoo has been under fire ever since the Washington Free Beacon revealed
Couric's documentary was intentionally edited to make pro-gun Americans appear incapable of justifying their views.
Katie Couric's
GunGate Implosion is a Sign of Things to Come. While it is not yet complete, it appears that Katie Couric's
career is over, at least as a "respectable" journalist. Couric has been a reliably "progressive" advocate for
decades. In this, she simply followed the career progression that has been common in the dominant media for
50 years. Control of the media by one ideology, a "progressive" groupthink, has been a near fatal flaw
in our system. It is finally coming to a close.
Newsrooms
dance around selective editing of Couric's gun documentary. Some newsrooms are still reluctant to report
outright that Katie Couric's gun documentary was selectively edited, despite the existence of audio evidence and an admission
from the film's director. Instead, several reports have been couched in careful language suggesting the Yahoo news
anchor and documentary director Stephanie Soechtig have only been accused of doctoring interviews with pro-Second
Amendment activists.
Sometimes, Heads
Should Roll. Of course Yahoo News should fire Katie Couric. She committed an act of gross intellectual
dishonesty — and if you don't fire a journalist for dishonesty, what [...] do you fire one for? Bad manners?
[...] Journalists are not supposed to tell lies to their audiences. Couric did. Case closed.
Katie
Couric cooks the facts, burns her reputation. [Scroll down] To make her case for more gun regulation she
decided to transition from journalism to falsification and propaganda. Instead of showing the interview question and
answer as they actually happened, she edited in an eight-second clip of the group sitting silently and slightly uncomfortably
waiting to be interviewed. Couric clearly wanted to present her question as though she were Perry Mason at the climax
of a courtroom drama coming up with a killer debating point that confounded all opposition witnesses. She wanted it to
seem as though no reasonable person could disagree and to present the gun rights group as tacitly acknowledging it by staying
silent and looking at their feet. Oh, Katie, you're so clever, you foxed those foolish gun nuts!
Katie
Couric is mad she was caught deceptive edit anti-gun video. As is typical for progressive hypocrites, they
never take responsibility when they are caught doing things like Katie Couric. She was exposing for deceptively editing
her anti-gun bs video for Yahoo: Under the Gun. News about this came out about a week ago, and Couric had been
silent about being exposed, until now. She is blaming someone named Stephanie Soechtig for deceptively editing the
video. Yahoo now has their own personal version of Brian Williams.
As
Silence, Defiance Goes On Over Dishonest Edit, Katie Couric's Proud Legacy Taking Serious Hit. [Scroll
down] But after leaving CBS (due to Evening News ratings struggles), Couric completed the Big-3 triad by joining
ABC in 2011. That tenure was hardly memorable as Couric simply couldn't establish herself among a sea of (younger)
talent. Her gravitas in the industry was still there but her overall relevance fading. Enter Yahoo News,
which made her the face of its growing online news division two years ago. If that reads like a career obituary, it's
because it may very well be.
Dear
Yahoo, Fire Katie Couric. The case is clear. Katie Couric, a person Yahoo employs to be the face of its
news division, was caught in a grotesque deception. Then, when she was publicly exposed, rather than apologizing, she
doubled down — defending the choice to cast innocent Americans as ignorant rubes rather than allowing them to
speak for themselves. She has lost her credibility. Any news organization that continues to employ her loses its
credibility as well.
Couric
Regrets 'Unnecessary Mistake' of Deceptive Edit in Gun Documentary. Katie Couric reportedly regrets the
"unnecessary mistake" of editing her documentary Under the Gun in a way that appeared to smear gun rights
advocates. In one scene of the documentary released last week, Couric is speaking to the Virginia Citizens Defense
League (VCDL) and asks, "If there are no background checks for gun purchasers, how do you prevent felons or terrorists from
purchasing a gun?" In the documentary, her question is followed by several seconds of silence, suggesting that her
question had rendered them dumb. In fact, the interviewees offered lucid responses to her question almost immediately,
a fact that was revealed when the VCDL released their own audio recording of the interview. The VCDL called the edit
"unbelievable and extremely unprofessional." "I never intended to make anyone look bad and I apologize if anyone felt
that way," the documentary's director Stephanie Soechtig said after the news broke last Wednesday [5/25/2016].
The Editor says... Of course they intended to make gun owners look bad. That was apparently the whole purpose of the film.
Katie Couric
Is A Liberal Hack, Site Claims. Stephen Gutowski of The Washington Free Beacon had a great story
Wednesday [5/25/2016]. You can read it [elsew]here. He obtained audio that proves the filmmaker of Katie Couric's
latest politicized documentary, Under the Gun, deceptively edited an interview with gun rights activists to make them
look ignorant and ashamed. The evidence he found is clear, it is direct, it is stunning, and it is embarrassing.
But it is not nearly as embarrassing as the way in which the filmmaker, Couric, and the New York Times reacted to the
Free Beacon's reporting. They all need to spend some time alone in the corner and think about what they've done.
Audio
Shows Katie Couric Documentary Deceptively Edited Interview with Pro-Gun Activists. Under the Gun bills
itself as a documentary that "examines the events and people who have kept the gun debate fierce and the progress slow, even
as gun deaths and mass shootings continue to increase." It follows a number of gun violence victims and those who have
lost family members to gun violence as they advocate for stricter gun control laws. The 1 hour and 45 minute
film was executive produced and narrated by Katie Couric. Under the Gun has been labeled "dishonest politicking
in the guise of media coverage," "loose with the facts," and "a full-length assault on guns and the Second Amendment" by those
in the gun community since its debut on May 15.
The
Fraud In "Gungate" Is Real, And Should End Katie Couric's Career. As we noted yesterday, a gun rights group,
Virginia Citizens Defense League (VCDL), agreed to sit down with a member of Couric's film team for more than two hours of
interviews. Most of the footage ended up on the cutting room floor, but the real scandal was when Couric's team was
caught red-handed swapping out the actual answer for one of the questions they asked VCDL with footage of them staring at the
floor, making it appear that they didn't have an answer to her question. That is not what happened. Stephen
Gutowski and his team at the Free Beacon isolated the actual uncut audio footage as part of their coverage of the
story, and it proves without a doubt that the VCDL members did have an immediate and detailed response to question.
Katie
Couric defends documentary that selectively edited gun advocates. Yahoo news anchor Katie Couric is standing by
her gun documentary, even after the discovery that it was selectively edited to make it appear as if she stumped gun
advocates with a simple question about background checks. In a statement to the Washington Examiner's media
desk, Couric said she is "very proud of the film." The documentary's director, Stephanie Soechtig, told the Examiner,
"There are a wide range of views expressed in the film. My intention was to provide a pause for the viewer to have a moment
to consider this important question before presenting the facts on Americans' opinions on background checks."
The Editor says...
Ri-i-i-ight. If you believe that, you probably won't learn much from the rest of this web page.
Buzzfeed
Why
is Fake News Accepted by so Many? A recent event comprising a publication by BuzzFeed and responses to it indicates
a continuing problem. BuzzFeed, citing two anonymous federal law enforcement officials reported on January 17, 2019
that Robert Mueller had evidence that President Trump told Michael Cohen to lie about discussions of a potential proposed Trump
Tower to be built in Moscow. On the next day, January 18, 2019, a spokesperson for Mueller repudiated the story:
"BuzzFeed's description of specific statements to the Special Counsel's Office, and characterization of documents and testimony
obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen's Congressional testimony are not accurate." Several aspects are interesting.
One is the refusal of BuzzFeed (and CNN and MSNBC) to accept Mueller's denial. BuzzFeed editor Ben Smith stood by its reporting
despite the fact that no texts or other documents corroborated the story. [...] Patience is not one of the outstanding characteristics
of the media. The initial, inaccurate, BuzzFeed story immediately caught fire and went "viral". Its accuracy was not
immediately challenged by much of the media.
BuzzFeed's First
Round of Layoffs Puts an End to Its National News Desk. "This is going to be a tough week," Ben Smith, the
editor in chief of BuzzFeed News, wrote in an email to his staff on Wednesday. On Friday, the newsroom learned just how
tough, when the company laid off 43 of the roughly 250 journalists who worked in that division, according to a BuzzFeed
spokesman. The cut was the start of a planned 15 percent reduction of the overall work force at BuzzFeed, a company
perhaps best known for producing content meant to be shared on social media. The layoffs, which the staff learned about
from an email sent by the BuzzFeed founder Jonah Peretti, are expected to continue into next week and affect around 200 employees.
Does
the Media Deserve to Be Respected and Believed? [Scroll down] The fun stopped suddenly last Friday night
when a spokesman for Mueller's office said in a statement, "BuzzFeed's description of specific statements to the Special
Counsel's Office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen's
Congressional testimony are not accurate." Time to reprise all those 40-year-old Emily Litella riffs from "Saturday Night
Live." In this case, the "never mind" moment came from CNN chief legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin. "The larger message
that a lot of people are going to take from this story," he said to four glum panel members, "is that the news media are a
bunch of leftist liars who are dying to get the president, and they're willing to lie to do it."
The media's 'Gotcha!'
hysteria is shameful. It was a shameful spectacle. The BuzzFeed News report that special counsel Robert
Mueller had corroborating evidence that Trump had instructed his former lawyer, Michael Cohen, to lie to Congress about a
Moscow commercial project set the anti-Trump mob on fire. It was the bombshell development Dems and 90 percent of
the media have dreamed of — and finally it was here. Oh, Happy Days! Except it wasn't true.
Mueller said so in an unprecedented debunking that slammed the brakes on the celebration.
Everyone
Who Takes on Trump Ends Up Crushed. What is this eerie power Donald Trump has to select the perfect enemies,
enemies whose own myriad failings often cause them to commit ritual suicide whenever they face him? He usually doesn't
even have to do anything — these goofs do it to themselves. His latest victim is BuzzFraud, that
listcicle-curating web site for millennial geeks [...] It's not like BuzzFraud had a lot of journalistic credibility to
start with, but props to them for managing to gather up every iota of once and future integrity, hauling it out in front
of everyone, dousing it with 91 octane premium, and tossing in a match.
What makes a liberal want to punch a child?
If someone walks up to you and bangs a drum in your face, are you guilty of harassing the drummer? You might be if
you're white and wearing a MAGA hat. [...] It was a tale perfectly tailored to liberal biases: white Catholic teenagers in
MAGA hats had harassed an old and frail Indian veteran during the March for Life, which was also the date of an Indigenous
People's March. BuzzFeed had just two anonymous sources, purportedly in 'law-enforcement,' for its story, which a few
brave souls found to be rather too little to justify the attendant hype. The contrarians appear to have been right, but
what BuzzFeed misreported was so perfectly attuned to elite and progressive anti-Trump sensibilities that no hesitation was
necessary before accepting the tale as true.
BuzzFeed, buzz
off. On Thursday evening BuzzFeed posted a story with the attention-grabbing headline "President Trump Directed
His Attorney Michael Cohen To Lie To Congress About The Moscow Tower Project." CNN ran with the story essentially nonstop
yesterday. Below is CNN New Day's tweet with a video clip of the show's interview with BuzzFeed reporter Anthony Cormier
discussing his story yesterday morning. The excitement was palpable. "If true," Trump was toast.
Democrats couldn't contain themselves. [...] If not true, however, BuzzFeed is toast. Or should be.
Dear
reporter: First, wipe the egg and the smirk off your face. [Scroll down] The BuzzFeed story was
false. BuzzFeed stories throughout the Trump presidency have been false. No real journalist would have gone with
the story. "According to BuzzFeed" does not let reporters off the hook because they vouched for BuzzFeed by basing
stories on its reporting. [Aaron] Blake needs to apologize. Blake needs to decide if he is a reporter or a pundit.
Weird
new frontiers in media bias: BuzzFeed versus Robert Mueller? Thursday [1/17/2019], BuzzFeed reported that President
Trump had ordered Michael Cohen to lie to Congress. Friday, at a late hour (after a day of misinformation), Robert Mueller had his
office refute the details of the report and its implications. This is a rare event by the special counsel office. Those on
the right see this as further evidence of "fake news," and the left argues that this proves how fair Mueller will be. We must
wonder how this story originated. BuzzFeed editor Ben Smith is still claiming that the story is accurate and wants Mueller to
clarify his denial. Watching the reporters on CNN and MSNBC with downtrodden faces try to analyze how to turn this defeat around
makes one cringe as journalism has taken another severe hit. BuzzFeed had reported on the Steele dossier, which was the source
of the FISA warrants and shown to be false. Trump antagonists still see BuzzFeed as a serious media outlet.
Yet
another Trump 'bombshell' ends up being a hoax. Another leak about President Trump, supposedly from federal prosecutors, and
another media freakout. This one was different from the earlier ones in its seriousness. Two reporters from BuzzFeed, citing two
anonymous law enforcement officials, reported that Trump had instructed his former lawyer Michael Cohen to lie to Congress, or at least
that this accusation had been passed on to special counsel Robert Mueller. In a late Friday night [1/18/2019] news dump 24 hours
after this "scoop," Mueller released a statement that the whole thing was a big hoax — "not accurate."
Mueller
team disputes BuzzFeed report claiming Trump told Cohen to lie. Special Counsel Robert Mueller's office on
Friday issued an extraordinary statement disputing a bombshell news report that claimed President Trump directed Michael
Cohen to lie about the timing of discussions over a proposed Trump Tower project in Moscow. "BuzzFeed's description of
specific statements to the Special Counsel's Office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office,
regarding Michael Cohen's Congressional testimony are not accurate," Peter Carr, a spokesman for Mueller's office,
said. The statement is remarkable in that Mueller's team rarely issues statements in response to news stories.
Dems
Who Pushed BuzzFeed Report Silent After Special Counsel Statement. Democrats who pushed BuzzFeed's
anonymously-sourced report that President Trump had instructed his former lawyer Michael Cohen to lie to Congress were silent
Friday evening [1/18/2019] after Special Counsel Robert Mueller's office issued a statement disputing the report. "BuzzFeed's
description of specific statements to the Special Counsel's Office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained
by this office, regarding Michael Cohen's Congressional testimony are not accurate," Special Counsel spokesman Peter Carr
said in a statement.
Trump Praises Mueller
for Knocking Down 'Phony' Buzzfeed Story. President Donald Trump offered rare praise Saturday for the special
counsel's office, which issued a statement Friday night knocking down a BuzzFeed story alleging Trump instructed his former
lawyer, Michael Cohen, to lie to Congress about Russia. "I appreciate the special counsel coming out with a statement
last night. I think it was very appropriate that they did so. I very much appreciate that," Trump told reporters
outside the White House. "I think that the BuzzFeed piece was a disgrace to our country. It was a disgrace to
journalism," Trump said, referring to BuzzFeed's report as a "totally phony story."
Another TEOTWAWKI
Nothing-Burger. Surprise, surprise, yawn. Another "bombshell report" that turns out to be nothing but a
firecracker, if that. [...] By trial and error, We the People have learned to separate the wheat from the chaff, the
trustworthy from propaganda, valid news from intentional disinformation. One thing for sure — the old fossil
news organizations can no longer be trusted. These days only hopelessly hypnotized sheeple pay them any attention
at all.
CNN Guest:
Buzzfeed 'Got Their Brains Kicked In' by Mueller's Team. CNN contributor Joan Walsh declined to "jump to say
that [BuzzFeed] did something wrong" because their journalists have a "good track record," but Ferguson scoffed at the idea
that the news outlet should get the benefit of the doubt. "Two things here: BuzzFeed is not a serious news
organization, they shouldn't be treated as such moving forward," Ferguson said. "This is embarrassing they put this out
there." "To try to defend BuzzFeed, I think, is ridiculous," he added. Walsh contested, "BuzzFeed is an excellent
news organization." "Well, you can say that, but they just got their brains kicked in by the Special Counsel's office,"
Ferguson asserted.
CNN
Analyst: Many Americans Will Dismiss Media as 'Leftist Liars' Over Disputed BuzzFeed Story. CNN legal
analyst Jeffrey Toobin fretted Friday that many Americans would dismiss the news media as a "bunch of leftist liars" in the
wake of the BuzzFeed News story called "not accurate" by special counsel Robert Mueller's office. BuzzFeed set off a
Washington firestorm on Thursday [1/17/2019] with its report that President Donald Trump had directed longtime lawyer Michael
Cohen to lie to Congress about negotiations to build a Trump Tower in Moscow. However, on Friday night, a spokesman for
Mueller's office said the report was "not accurate."
Trump
calls release of BuzzFeed report 'a sad day for journalism'; Giuliani urges DOJ pursuit of leakers. President
Trump on Friday night slammed a BuzzFeed News report, which alleges the president has been implicated in a crime, saying its
release marked a "very sad day for journalism" after Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team released a rare statement claiming
the outlet got its facts wrong. Trump went to Twitter to remind his 57.5 million followers that BuzzFeed, an outlet he
once called a "failing pile of garbage," once also published the unverified and salacious dossier by former British spy Christopher
Steele that was used to justify the FISA surveillance warrant against Carter Page, a former campaign adviser to then-candidate
Trump. "Remember it was Buzzfeed that released the totally discredited 'Dossier,' paid for by Crooked Hillary Clinton and
the Democrats (as opposition research), on which the entire Russian probe is based!" he tweeted. "A very sad day for
journalism, but a great day for our Country!"
Levin
Blasts Buzzfeed Report, Past Questionable Reporting: 'Yellow Journalism as Low as I've Seen'. "Life, Liberty &
Levin" host Mark Levin said on "Hannity" that the Buzzfeed report disputed by Special Counsel Robert Mueller was the latest
example of "yellow journalism" by a media outlet trying to take down the president. Sean Hannity said the documented
"pages" of unconfirmed reporting that have been published by various news outlets critical of Trump is "hurting the country."
"It's all intended to drive toward impeachment," Levin responded.
Buzzfeed
News Bombshell Reporter: No We Have Not Seen the Evidence Supporting Our Report. Anthony Cormier is one
of the two investigative reporter at BuzzfeedNews who co-authored the bombshell report published Thursday night [1/17/2019] —
a report which claimed President Donald Trump directed his former lawyer Michael Cohen to lie during Congressional testimony over
discussions between the Trump Organization and Russian authorities about a Trump Tower Moscow project. Cormier appeared on
CNN's New Day and revealed that he had not seen the evidence underlying his report.
Nine
Reasons to Be Skeptical of BuzzFeed's Cohen Report. [#1] BuzzFeed's Lead Reporter Is a Proven Liar: The
lead reporter on the story is Jason Leopold, someone no less than Columbia Journalism Review declared a "serial fabulist."
[...] [#2] BuzzFeed's Lead Reporter Has Published Fake Bombshell Scoops Before: In 2006, Leopold shook the world with
the news that Karl Rove — get this — "told President Bush and Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten, as well as
a few other high level administration officials" he would be indicted for leaking Valerie Plame's name to the media. [...]
[#4] We Are Supposed to Believe Michael Cohen: Lost in all the hype over this story is the fact that the source of the
allegation against Trump can only be Michael Cohen, who has already pled guilty and will be going to prison for, among other
things, lying.
The Media's Endless Anti-Trump Show
Trial. What was the "Steele dossier" fiasco but a Dem/media attempt to collude with Brits to stop Trump? Had BuzzFeed
not released the contents of that transparently ridiculous and bogus dossier, the self-appointed ruling class would still be talking about it.
Lightweights in the press, straining to sound deep, will recite such quotes as "the bigger the lie, the more it will be believed," even as their
coverage rests upon the biggest lie of all: the assertion of imaginary Trump-Russia criminal collusion based on nothing more than false,
fragmentary leads that came from their own collusion with foreign powers.
D.C.
firm behind the Trump 'dirty dossier' refusing to cooperate with Congress. The Washington firm that
commissioned the dirty dossier on President Trump is stonewalling congressional investigators. In a piece for the New
York Post, conservative author Paul Sperry writes that the firm, Fusion GPS, which was started by three former Wall Street
Journal reporters, is not cooperating with Congress in order to cover up an allegiance to the Democratic party.
Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, is spearheading an investigation into the
dossier, and wants to know the identities of the people who paid Fusion to dig up dirt on Trump.
Sketchy
Firm behind Trump dossier is stalling investigation. A secretive Washington firm that commissioned the dubious
intelligence dossier on Donald Trump is stonewalling congressional investigators trying to learn more about its connections
to the Democratic Party. The Senate Judiciary Committee earlier this month threatened to subpoena the firm, Fusion GPS,
after it refused to answer questions and provide records to the panel identifying who financed the error-ridden dossier,
which was circulated during the election and has sparked much of the Russia scandal now engulfing the White House.
BuzzFeed
Loses Pair of Motions in 'Trump Dossier' Lawsuit. A lawsuit against BuzzFeed over the publication of the so-called "Trump
Dossier" will go forward, and not in New York City as the left-wing media outlet's lawyers had hoped. U.S. District Judge Ursula
Ungaro ruled against a motion filed by BuzzFeed, which asked to move the case to New York, where BuzzFeed is headquartered.
BuzzFeed also unsuccessfully filed to have the case dismissed.
Melania's
first court win is a warning shot to journalists with dodgy info. Recently, there's been an argument among
top-flight journalists like BuzzFeed's Ben Smith about whether it's a good idea to publish potentially defamatory information
that is unverified and which even you yourself doubt in part or in whole. The only correct answer is: never do
this. And if you have to do it ... still don't do it. Because there's an excellent chance that, if
you are sued, a court will interpret your willingness to publish that which you acknowledge might be false as "reckless disregard"
for the truth.
BuzzFeed sued
over its publication of uncorroborated Trump dossier. A Russian-tied tech firm named in a controversial dossier
containing uncorroborated allegations about President Donald Trump and the hacking of Democratic National Committee email
accounts announced late Friday that it has filed defamation suits against the online news site BuzzFeed, its editor in chief
and a former British intelligence agent. The lawsuits were brought by XBT Holdings, a Cyprus-based company owned by
Russian tech magnate Aleksej Gubarev. Lawyers for his firm filed complaints Friday in London against the former spy and
his company, and against BuzzFeed and its editor in chief, Ben Smith, in Broward County Circuit Court in Fort Lauderdale,
Florida, where XBT's subsidiary Webzilla is headquartered.
Tucker
Carlson Grills Buzzfeed's Editor-in-Chief on Decision To Publish Dossier. Ben Smith, editor of "failing pile of
garbage" Buzzfeed, appeared on Fox News tonight to talk to Tucker Carlson about his site's decision to publish that
dossier. He's explained the decision multiple times, been raked over the coals on all manner of networks, and even had
his choice questioned by Carlson before, but Smith was back for what felt like Round 282 tonight. He pointed out that
his decision to publish a dossier that was being spoken about among high-ranking government officials and alluded to by some
was really no different than what Matt Drudge did by breaking the Monica Lewinsky story.
Bourbons
of the Press, Believed by But 15%, Straggle on in Defeat. [Scroll down] Then came the Russian connection.
Just as FBI director James Comey had been unable to control an internal revolt against the whitewash of Mrs. Clinton's illegal
handling of her e-mails and was forced to acknowledge a problem, some element of the intelligence apparatus released the fatuous
Golden Shower dossier, which no press outlet would touch until BuzzFeed, a barrel-scraping, muck-raking left-wing blog, put it out
and CNN took it up with tremendous fanfare, claiming Herculean journalistic enterprise to have unearthed it. Mr. Trump
called it "fake news [from] a pile of garbage," and it died.
How
BuzzFeed crossed the line in publishing salacious 'dossier' on Trump. Where does transparency meet
irresponsibility? Right at the line that BuzzFeed's editor Ben Smith approached Tuesday and decided to step over in the
name of serving citizens' best interests. With caveats and explanations aplenty, Smith published a 35-page
"dossier" — actually just a bunch of scurrilous allegations dressed up as an intelligence report meant to damage
Donald Trump. Smith said he did so because his, and BuzzFeed's, preference and philosophy is, essentially, "When in
doubt, publish." But at many other news organizations, the rule is caution: "When in doubt, leave it out."
Oppo
Researcher Behind Trump Dossier Is Linked To Pro-Kremlin Lobbying Effort. The head of the opposition research
firm that is behind the Trump dossier is linked to a secret campaign aimed at undermining the Magnitsky Act, a law that
places sanctions on Russian criminals and is vehemently opposed by the Kremlin, The Daily Caller can report. The main
proponent of that law, a British-American businessman named Bill Browder, tells TheDC that Glenn Simpson, the head of Fusion
GPS, the company behind the Trump dossier, is a "professional smear campaigner." According to Browder, Simpson, a former
Wall Street Journal reporter, is working with a former Russian counterintelligence officer named Rinat Akhmetshin to destroy
the Magnitsky Act, which is named after Browder's late lawyer, Sergei Magnitsky, and was signed into law in Dec. 2012.
Bob Woodward
calls Trump dossier 'garbage'. Legendary journalist Bob Woodward on Sunday clashed with his former Watergate
reporting partner over the intelligence briefing of President-elect Donald Trump on the salacious allegations contained in an
unverified dossier of opposition research. "I've lived in this world for 45 years where you get things and people make
allegations," Woodward told "Fox News Sunday." "That is a garbage document. It never should have been presented
in — as part of an intelligence briefing."
Oppo
Firm Behind Trump Dossier Is Also A Hired Gun For Planned Parenthood. The opposition research firm that hired a
former British spy to dig up dirt on Donald Trump is the same shady outfit that was hired by Planned Parenthood to put a
positive spin on videos showing the sale of baby parts. The New York Times reported on Wednesday that Washington
D.C.-based Fusion GPS is the firm that hired Christopher Steele, the former British spy who authored the salacious but
unsubstantiated 35-page Trump dossier that was published by BuzzFeed on Tuesday. Earlier on Wednesday, The Wall Street
Journal identified Steele, who runs a U.K.-based business intelligence firm called Orbis Business, as the author of the memo.
Wow!
Look who's attacking Buzzfeed for publishing 'fake news'. A major network anchor, a person previously
personally ridiculed by Donald Trump with an insulting nickname, jumped on board the "fake news" bandwagon, attacking the
editor of Buzzfeed who decided to publish a scurrilous opposition research memo that was peddled to the media for
months. Is this what Osama bin Laden meant when he said that people are naturally attracted to a "strong horse"?
Nothing could better symbolize the triumph of Donald Trump's stance toward the media than this appearance on the daily
version of Meet the Press by Ben Smith, editor of Buzzfeed, and the tough remarks he received from "sleepy Chuck Todd,"
of NBC News, widely regarded as the most anti-Trump network of all.
Peak
'Fake News': BuzzFeed, CNN Target Trump with Admittedly Unverifiable Russia 'Memos'. On Tuesday, CNN reported
that President-elect Donald Trump and President Barack Obama had been briefed by the intelligence community on memos alleging
there was communication between Trump's campaign and Russian officials. CNN suggested the existence of
highly-compromising material targeting Trump which was compiled by a former British intelligence officer.
The Buzzfeed
Standard. So last night, BuzzFeed decided to publish a "dossier" filled with allegations — one of
them absolutely disgusting — against Donald Trump whose veracity it openly said it could not verify. All
BuzzFeed knew was that the dossier had been circulating in political circles, that it had been generated by "political
opponents of Trump," and had been produced by a former British intelligence agent. [...] But I want to take my argument a
little further and explain why — even if every allegation in the dossier is true — what happened
here may be a point of no return for whatever is left of fact-based American journalism.
CNN
Media Heads and Political DC Operatives Construct More Russian Madness. If they didn't continually use the same
playbook (reference Trump's pre-election manufactured sex assault accusers), these insufferable political media constructs
would not be so transparent. There are trillions of dollars at stake. The framework for the latest narrative
begins with a CNN report, constructed by a familiar set of characters (Jake Tapper, Jim Sciutto, Evan Perez and Carl
Bernstein), all referencing a vague and intensely obtuse claim about Russians attempting to gain some form of opposition
research leverage against President-elect Trump.
Buzzfeed's
Trump report takes 'fake news' to a new level. So the website BuzzFeed decided to publish a series of memos
that have been floating around for months alleging all kinds of terrible things about Donald Trump. Some of those
terrible allegations have to do with efforts to influence the American elections and Trump. Some of them have to do
with Trump's personal sexual conduct. Readers of this newspaper know well not to include me among Trump's
supporters. But the scurrilousness of what BuzzFeed has done here is so beyond the bounds of what is even remotely
acceptable it should compel even those most outraged by Trump's political excesses to come to his defense and to the defense
of a few other people mentioned in these papers whose names are also dragged through the mud.
Why
You Should Doubt that Salacious Trump Espionage Memo. Two explosive but implausible claims on page 7. First,
"PUTIN motivated by fear and hatred of Hillary CLINTON." Hatred, I guess I can see, but fear? Really? You think
he was afraid of what a Clinton administration would do to Russia? After Hillary's State Department signed off on a deal that
gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States? Secondly, the memo claims the
Russian government was getting "intel from TRUMP's team on Russian oligarchs and their families in US." If true, this would
be the most devastating allegation in the memo; Trump would be acting as an agent of Russian intelligence. But think about
this for a moment. Yes, Trump has had some dealings with Russian oligarchs over the years. But how much relevant information
about those oligarchs would Trump have access to? How much would he know that Russian intelligence wouldn't already know?
Left-wing media
stunned that Trump hits back. [Scroll down] But here's what the corrupt media will not tell you: BuzzFeed is nothing more than
a political propaganda arm of the Democratic Party. In June, the website terminated an advertising deal with the Republican National
Committee because, as their CEO said, "The Trump campaign is directly opposed to the freedoms of our employees in the United States and
the world." Two days later, BuzzFeed's chairman, Kenneth Lerer, hosted a $33,000-a-ticket Democratic National Committee fundraiser
in New York City that President Obama attended. Lerer already had a long history of donating to Democrats — since 2004, he's
contributed almost a half a million dollars to Democrats, including $2,700 to Hillary Clinton in 2016. It should be no surprise
that, even after being exposed by President-elect Trump, BuzzFeed editor-in-chief Ben Smith is standing by the decision to publish what
amounts to fake news in a desperate attempt to smear the next commander-in-chief.
It
was me: Sworn Trump enemy John McCain admits HE handed smear dossier to FBI. Sworn Donald Trump enemy
John McCain admitted Wednesday that he passed the dossier of claims of a Russian blackmail plot against the president-elect — calling
it 'what any citizen should do'. McCain — a longstanding anti-Trump Republican who had disassociated himself from
the candidate's campaign weeks before the election — cast himself as an innocent and concerned member of the public as he
justified his move. He claimed he had no idea whether it was accurate or not — but that he believed the FBI should have
it because it was 'sensitive'.
BuzzFeed
Could Be In Legal Trouble For Publishing Trump Doc. While BuzzFeed weathers criticism for publishing a document
cache containing unsubstantiated and scandalous allegations about President-elect Donald Trump and his confidantes, they also
could face legal consequences. The organization elected to publish a 35-page dossier claiming Russian operatives had
compromising personal and financial information about the president-elect and others in his orbit. The documents were
compiled by a former British intelligence officer working for a private intelligence firm in London at the behest of Trump's
political opponents. They were later shared with Democratic political operatives and members of Congress.
Rand
Paul: Anyone Who Leaked Trump Intel Report to the Press Should Be Jailed. Wednesday on Fox News Channel's
"Your World," Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) told host Neil Cavuto it was his view that if it were a U.S. intelligence agency
that leaked an unsubstantiated dossier on President-elect Donald Trump and his relationship with Russia to the press, there
should be repercussions, including prosecution and possible jail time. "What I would say is that if there is private
information that someone is blackmailing a public figure and the public figure or someone takes it to the intelligence
agencies, you would think it would be private. And really, this is so important that I think whoever leaked it should
be prosecuted. Someone should go to jail if this was an intelligence agency head talked to the media, they should go to
jail. If it was the Obama administration, they should go to jail." Paul offered his reason, saying such blackmail
efforts may go unreported in the future.
Rachel Maddow
Rachel
Maddow's Viewership Plummets After Trump Tax Reveal. MSNBC host Rachel Maddow saw a steep drop in ratings the
day after she released one of President Trump's tax forms. Maddow and her preceding host Chris Hayes heavily promoted
Tuesday's broadcast as a "breaking" revelation, and Maddow devoted most of her program to Trump's two-page 1040 form from 2005.
What's
Wrong With Rachel Maddow's Trump Income Tax 'Scoop'? The mainstream press turned on Rachel Maddow after her
disastrous attempt to drum up ratings by hyping a humdrum Donald Trump tax return. Why are they upset? She just
did what they've been doing since Trump got elected. After teasing a "huge scoop" on Twitter — that she had
Trump's tax returns — Maddow got scooped by the White House, which announced a half-hour before her show started
that Trump paid $38 million in taxes in 2005, which was all Maddow had. That's a huge amount of taxes by any standard,
and represented 24% of Trump's income that year. It didn't take long for others to point out this effective rate was
higher President Obama's (19%) or Socialist Bernie Sanders (13%), or even the average paid by MSNBC's parent company,
Comcast, between 2008 and 2012 (24%).
The
Greatest Fake News Reveal Of All Time: Trump's 2005 Tax Returns. It was real news, but there was nothing
in it. That didn't stop Rachel Maddow of MSNBC from playing up her big reveal of two pages from Donald Trump's 2005 tax
returns like she had just discovered the Dead Sea Scrolls.
Rachel
Maddow Turned a Scoop on Donald Trump's Taxes Into a Cynical, Self-Defeating Spectacle. At 7:36 p.m.
Tuesday, Rachel Maddow tweeted, "BREAKING: We've got Trump tax returns. Tonight, 9pm ET. MSNBC. (Seriously)," sending
the internet into a frenzy of theorizing. Did Maddow have Donald Trump's tax returns or just one of the Trumps' tax
returns? Could this be it, the tax return that would bring down the Donald? If this was it, why wasn't MSNBC
cutting into its programming, instead of running a countdown clock to Maddow's show?
Twitter
Just Shredded Rachel Maddow Over Trump Tax Return 'Story'. MSNBC's unapologetic liberal "journalist" Rachel
Maddow lit the internet on fire Tuesday night when she teased via Twitter that she'd gotten her hands on President Donald
Trump's tax returns — a scoop that would have been pretty juicy, considering Trump never released his tax returns
during the presidential campaign as all other modern-era presidents have done. If only it'd been true. What
Maddow and the fine folks over at MSNBC actually managed to do was get part of a copy of Trump's 2005 tax
return. Which was already 12 years old. And which the White House had already released.
Backup
theory: Trump leaked his own tax returns? It didn't take long for MSNBC and Rachel Maddow to go from hero
to goat last night. Now some want to move them from goat to ... victim? After spending all day hyping an exclusive
on Donald Trump's 2005 tax returns but delivering a prime-time "total nothingburger," as Chris Cillizza put it at the Washington
Post, some are speculating that Trump set up Maddow by leaking the tax returns himself.