News Media Sensationalism and Dishonesty

Just reporting the news (if there is any) won't generate ratings as effectively as reporting news items with an emotional twist.  For example, shootings, fires, train derailments, and police standoffs always seem to be "dangerously close" to a school.  With schools only a quarter of a mile apart in the big cities, there's always one near enough to make that connection.

I recall an occasion a couple of years ago when there was a gang-related shooting in east Dallas just after midnight one night, right next to an elementary school, and the next morning there was a reporter on the scene fretting about how the shooting took place "dangerously close" to the school.  But logically, that was the best possible place for a shooting in the middle of the night — when nobody's at school!

Reporters often use meaningless one-dimensional statistics; for example, "Texas leads the nation in big-rig accidents."  (That's a quote from a recent story designed to drum up support for some new state law.)  That makes it sound like the truck drivers on Texas highways are more dangerous than anywhere else.  But Texas has more highway mileage than most other states, and lots of really bad drivers on the road.

But there are more subtle components of media sensationalism that the average viewer hardly notices, at least consciously.  Major market stations spend millions of dollars every year on futuristic news sets, lighting, catchy music, sound effects, visual effects, character generators and various kinds of electronic graphics.  TV newscasts are staged and choreographed as thoroughly as a small-town play.  In the old days, a middle-aged white man sat behind a plain old desk and reported the news.  That's not enough in today's TV market.  The happy news team — representing all race and gender combinations — sits behind a Star Trek desk and reads whatever comes up on the TelePrompter.  They rarely use words that are longer than three syllables.  The high-priced news readers are really good at putting on a phony "concerned" look at just the right time, if Botox permits.  And if you'll notice, they are usually just stating the obvious, and only rarely does anyone speak on a single subject for more than five or ten seconds.


Subtopics on this page:

Sensationalism

Dishonesty

ABC

CBS

The Atlantic

National Public Radio

MSNBC

NBC

Time magazine

The Washington Post

CNN

Brian Williams

Rolling Stone

Politico

Katie Couric

Buzzfeed

Rachel Maddow


Related topics on other pages:

The New York Times
National Public Radio
Specific examples of media bias
The case of George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin
JournoList
The CBS Memo Controversy of September 2004
Dishonest and misleading stories about firearms.
Dishonest and misleading stories about the environment.




Sensationalism

What can we expect from the Left now?  The local Washington D.C. media is already interviewing government employees that are frightened they will lose their jobs under a second Trump administration.  Once the DOGE starts with cuts, the media will be trotting people out who will claim they can't pay their bills or are about to be homeless by losing their jobs.  Government employees who felt they were secure for life in their petty little positions will, for the first time, have to face the realities that everyday Americans do in regards to work.  Inside the beltway, there will be pity, but outside, in the rest of the country, no one will shed a tear.  This will be amplified when the media starts parading those impacted by deportations.  There are already cries that this will break up families.  Be prepared to see a staggering number of news stories alleging hardship and even brutality with deportations.

About the Supposedly Devastating Impact of that Supposed Transgender Ban in the American Military.  The news media is calmly warning that Donald Trump is planning to ban transgender servicemembers from the American military, which will absolutely gut the armed forces. [...] We'll practically have no military left!  It would be like a whole infantry division suddenly just vanishing:  15,000-plus transgendered service members.  You're going to see this number a lot in the weeks ahead.  The New Republic, today: "Donald Trump's plan to ban transgender people from the military would have a devastating effect:  At least 15,000 members would be forced to leave."  That number comes from a 2018 report by the now-defunct Palm Center, a pro-LGBT independent research institute in California, which reached this conclusion: "Transgender troops make up 0.7% (seven-tenths of one percent) of the military (Active Component and Selected Reserve)."  Their best guess about a total number: 14,707.  The media is just rounding that number up to the next thousand.  The Palm Center... extrapolated a lot, let's say, in good part by multiplying their guess about a percentage, derived from a grossly inadequate survey of a select number of active duty troops, times the total number of servicemembers.

An Electoral Awakening Worth Celebrating.  [Scroll down]  Since Biden's 2020 (s)election, Big Tech has actively censored Americans who highlight evidence of electoral fraud.  The propaganda press has labeled us "election deniers."  The DOJ, FBI, and too many partisan judges have treated J6 defendants worse than alleged murderers.  Protests for free and fair elections have been preposterously described as an "insurrection" worse than Pearl Harbor, 9/11, and the Civil War.  The mix of rhetorical overkill and political persecution have had a salubrious effect: an increasing number of Americans now recognize that the federal government conspires with social media companies to censor Americans' speech in violation of the First Amendment and that the criminal justice system is filled with corrupt and evil actors.

Trump Derangement is the Stupidest Political Phenomenon of My Lifetime.  The dismal cabal of hysterical adult children that makes up the alleged American cultural "mainstream," the responsible people you see on television and in the op-ed pages — Anne Applebaum, Tom Nichols, Ruth Ben-Ghiat, Adam Kinzinger, Liz Cheney, Joe Scarborough and his idiot wife, Jonathan Capehart, Max Boot, Jen Rubin, David French, Bill Kristol, Ruth Marcus, Nicolle Wallace, Dana Bash, and on and on, all of them completely interchangeable, one set of asinine talking points with a series of different faces sewn on the front — has spent the last year or ten descending into a urine-soaked psychotic tantrum.  They don't know anything, they don't understand anything, they don't say anything of value, they don't contribute anything, ever, and their voices are ubiquitous.  Living in this media environment is like living in a place where the air is made of manure.  They have absorbed no lesson.

The Media Isn't Terrified That 'the End of Democracy Is Nigh' — They're Terrified of Being Wrong.  A few days ago, I wrote a story about CBS reporting that FEMA had pulled back teams in North Carolina, partly because of an email from one park ranger claiming armed gangs of good old boys were out "a-huntin'" FEMA Feds.  Of course, there was no such thing.  Gangs of Appalachians' huntin' for Feds was about as likely as Jussie Smollett being attacked by two MAGA-hat-wearing thugs who happened to have a noose and a bottle of bleach at 2 a.m. in the middle of a Chicago snowstorm.  No sane person believed that sort of nonsense.  Well, Kamala Harris did, which gives us a hint into her critical thinking skills.  Kool-Aid-drinking Democrat cultists believe those stories because the priests of their religion have told them it's true.  Cultists never have to think — they just need to believe.  That's how cultists roll.  The congregation believes that, if elected, Trump will cause the "end of democracy."

Media Suddenly Covers Trump Rallies Again Because of Potential Assassination Attempts.  Conservatives started asking why the mainstream media suddenly decided to broadcast Donald Trump rallies, even though they've been avoiding doing that for a very long time.  According to the observant Americans, it is because they were informed in advance that the third assassination attempt on Trump would happen.  On Sept. 21, 2024, Trump War Room was the first to raise the question by posting screenshots from the propaganda industry's outlets like controlled opposition Fox News and openly leftist CNN, MSNBC and News Nation.  [Tweet]

Deep State Democrats and the Continuing Attempts to Kill President Trump.  What triggers the left-wing media?  Outrage and their ego.  They're outraged by sarcastic memes about illegal migrants eating cats and geese.  They're upset at those memes from "unsubstantiated" political remarks that mock the Democrats and Vice President Kamala Harris and President Joe Biden for overwhelming a small town in Ohio.  What is "substantiated" is that Biden and Harris have sent an unwanted 20,000 or so impoverished migrants from violent Haiti to Springfield, OH.  Yes, this an outrage!  The Democrats will not be ridiculed, especially not with memes.  But a president murdered before an election?  That doesn't stoke media's indignation.  "Today's apparent assassination attempt comes amid increasingly fierce rhetoric on the campaign trail itself," said NBC's Lester Holt.  "Mr. Trump, his running mate JD Vance, continue to make baseless claims about Haitian immigrants in [Springfield] Ohio."  And former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton [...] argued the most important thing is that the news media is not doing enough to portray Trump as a threat to democracy.

Vermont becomes the second US state to issue stay-at-home orders because of deadly mosquito-borne virus.  Vermont just became the second state to postpone public events in order to curb the spread of a deadly virus in the state.  The Green Mountain state joins neighboring Massachusetts in recommending their citizens stay home at night, amid high reports of Eastern Equine Encephalitis (EEE).  This rare sickness is carried by horses and spread by mosquitos, and in about 30 percent of human cases, can cause brain swelling, vomiting, seizures and death.

The Editor says...
The article above is an example of baseless news media hysteria.  The article says, "This rare sickness is carried by horses," so go about your business and stay away from horses!  There is no justification for "stay-at-home orders."  Tyranny is worse than disease.  The government is (again!) testing you to see if you will comply with their orders, no matter how pointless they are.

PBS and the False Narrative of "Slowly Dying" Coral Reefs.  Coral reefs are some of creation's most strikingly beautiful places.  Clean and clear blue water, graceful whales and sea turtles, swarms of dazzling fishes, and amazing coral.  We can't get enough of coral reefs, so we adorn our walls with paintings and photos.  Saltwater aquariums abound in households, restaurants and businesses around the world.  Naturally, we want to protect all this goodness and beauty.  Stewardship is in our DNA.  Our emotions can kick in when a threat is perceived.  Unfortunately, nefarious people know this about us.  People whose agenda has more to do with global power and control than with protecting coral reefs. [...] Take for example the PBS News feature titled "Conservationists take drastic measures to save coral reefs from climate change."  Published earlier this year, the video begins by falsely claiming that coral reefs around the world are "slowly dying."

Twisted Truth:  Lies, Extreme Lies, and Climate Statistics.  [C]laims of the hottest surface temperatures ever on record are made regularly for various locations across the US.  But, as noted in meteorologist Brian Sussman's new book Climate Cult, 20 states registered record maximum temperatures of at least 109 degrees Fahrenheit, all occurring in the 1930s, a decade that also contained the infamous Dust-Bowl years.  Yet a June New York Times article on the "not normal" summer heat conveniently displayed a graph with temperature trends beginning in the 1940s.  Fortunately for much of main-stream media that pushes a climate-disaster agenda, the public can be easily duped when temperatures are extra hot and knowledge of the climate record is extra low.  Standard statistical ploys using incomplete datasets or cherry-picked values are circulated on not just temperature levels, but also severe weather frequency and intensity, sea level fluctuations, and ice cap extents.

When you have junk science, you end up with mad scientists.  If journalists were curious, instead of talking puppets pushing the Democrat agenda, they could ask a simple question like I did, and use a search engine to find the answer:  "What are the warmest summers on record?"  The following information populated:  The warmest summer on record was in 1936 during the Dust Bowl, which was before we had central air... so it was colder for more than eight decades, while the population was rising rapidly, and while our use of the natural resources (which supposedly causes warming) was exploding.  (It should be noted that there was essentially no air conditioning of any type in 1936.)  Some of the other warm summers were 1934, 1901, 1911, and 1913.  They were clearly not caused by gas-powered cars, so getting rid of them can't possibly change the temperature.

Big Media conducted polls to determine which climate terms induced the most hysteria.  As it turns out, all that hysterical language, tsk-tsk finger-wagging at we commoners to abandon our modern luxuries like personal vehicles and gas stoves, and temperature map graphics with exaggerated red shading to suggest that we're in an emergency situation didn't do anything but turn the people off of to the whole "urgency" of the narrative. [...] Now to backtrack a little bit:  According to Williams, in April 2019, a "team of advertising consultants" published another study that suggested the climate terms commonly used at the time ("climate change" and "global warming") didn't do enough to whip the average media consumer into a panic — they suggested buzzwords like "climate crisis" and "environmental collapse" as it elicited a stronger "emotional" response.  Yes, you read that correctly:  They didn't want to encourage a more rational response, or be more objective, but play to a person's emotions... and exploit them.  Without facts on your side, what else do you have?

Polar Bears, Dead Coral and Other Climate Fictions.  [Scroll down]  Today, killer heat waves are the new climate horror story.  In July President Biden claimed "extreme heat is the No. 1 weather-related killer in the United States."  He is wrong by a factor of 25.  While extreme heat kills nearly 6,000 Americans each year, cold kills 152,000, of which 12,000 die from extreme cold.  Even including deaths from moderate heat, the toll comes to less than 10,000. Despite rising temperatures, age-standardized extreme-heat deaths have actually declined in the U.S. by almost 10% a decade and globally by even more, largely because the world is growing more prosperous.  That allows more people to afford air-conditioners and other technology that protects them from the heat.

Don't Buy the Media Lies About Crop Production.  One of the mainstream media's favorite pastimes in recent years has been trying to scare the pants off everyone by suggesting that climate change is decimating crop production around the world.  They are either lying intentionally, or mistaken.  However, in either case, there is some journalistic malpractice going on, as well as a notable failure of logic.  We have all seen the stories, the favorites of the media usually have to do with foods that are popular semi-luxury items, depending on where you live, like cocoa beans, coffee, and wine.  For instance, Forbes put out an article claiming that cocoa, olive oil, rice, and soybeans are all "particularly vulnerable" to the effects of "climate-induced stressors."

How the media coordinated the failed assassination of Donald Trump.  Two months ago, I predicted that the media were laying the groundwork for justifying the assassination of Donald Trump after the New Republic published an entire issue depicting the former president as Adolf Hitler.  I wish I could claim some supernatural gift of foresight, but it was not the first time I had made this prediction, and I was not alone, as several other pundits, including Tucker Carlson, had also seen the writing on the wall.  The attempted assassination of the leading presidential candidate on Saturday was shocking, but in many ways it felt inevitable.  The American media have been steadily intensifying their anti-Trump rhetoric for years, whipping their audience into a murderous frenzy.  The disgusting freaks who constitute the regime press are not concerned or outraged at the attempt to murder Trump; they are simply disappointed that the instrument of their vengeance was a bad shot.

The Press and Pundits Make Wild Claims in the Wake of the Court's Immunity Decision.  On MSNBC, Rachel Maddow warned that the Supreme Court had just unleashed death squads to roam our streets.  CNN legal analyst Norm Eisen announced that murder was now legal (at least for presidents), while others predicted that the ruling on presidential immunity would invite "tyranny."  Anyone reading the coverage would conclude that James Madison has been replaced by John Wick in a new "Baba Yaga" Republic.  President Biden fueled the sense of panic in an address that repeated widespread false claims about the decision in Trump v. United States.  Biden told the country that "for all practical purposes, today's decision almost certainly means that there are virtually no limits on what a president can do."  That, of course, is not true.  I have long opposed sweeping presidential privileges and powers.  I have long argued that a sitting president can be criminally charged in office.  But the portrayal of this Supreme Court opinion by the left and the media is wildly off base.

World's sleep being chipped away by hotter nights, global warming, Climate Central study says.  Climate change is not only harming the planet[,] it's also ruining our sleep.  A new report from Climate Central says rising nighttime temperatures are chipping away at human sleep across the globe.  Scientists found global mean temperatures have risen by more 34 degrees Fahrenheit since 1850, setting a new record in 2023.

Reaction and rebuttal:
World's Sleep Being Disrupted By Global Boiling.  It's amazing what a 1.7F increase (or 2.2F, depending on which climahysteric outlet you listen to) over 170+ years can do, eh?  All while the Warmists are trying to take air conditioning away from Other People, and stop those people in places like Africa from getting it[.] [...] ["]Scientists found global mean temperatures have risen by more 34 degrees Fahrenheit since 1850, setting a new record in 2023.["] [...] According to NASA the mean global temperature is 59F.  Are we seriously supposed to believe that it was 25F in 1850?

How the Met Office and BBC Try to Fool Us All.  As we all shiver in the autumnal weather during what is meant to be summer and some of us have even turned our central heating back on or continued using our winter duvets, there is one certainty — in a few weeks time, the good folk at Met Office and the BBC will tell us that we've just had the "warmest June on record".  After all, the Met Office and the BBC made the same claim about appalling April and miserable May.  In fact, the weather has been so wet that there is a risk of a potato shortage later this year.  So, what will be intriguing will be the mathematical contortions the Met Office and BBC will use to justify their preposterous nonsense.

The Editor says...
The article above was published on June 20, so it was a bit premature to say, "we've just had the 'warmest June on record.'"

BBC Pushes U.S. Heatwave Story But Buries 'Junuary' Winter Storm Story.  The BBC has a story today about the heatwave in May and early June the southwestern U.S. and Mexico.  Apparently, a report by the World Weather Attribution (WWA) group has claimed that climate change made the heatwave 35 times more likely, though exactly what that means goes unexplained. [...] The interesting thing about that BBC story is the complete lack of any mention of the spectacular plunge in temperatures across the northwestern United States as a major winter storm crossed over the Rockies into Montana and Idaho.

Groups urge FEMA to treat extreme heat as a major disaster.  As the first significant heat wave of the season sweeps across the country, several organizations are urging the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to classify extreme heat as a major disaster.  Tens of millions of Americans face dangerously hot temperatures this week in a heat wave moving from Midwest states like Ohio to cities in the Northeast.  "It's going to feel like the upper 90s, may even feel like 100 a couple of the afternoons," said Randi Rico, a WLWT meteorologist.

The Editor says...
[#1] Sometimes the weather in June is quite warm.  That is not a crisis or a disaster or an emergency.  There is no need to beg for money from FEMA.  The government can't control the weather.  [#2] It "may even feel like 100 a couple of the afternoons," the WLWT weather lady.  So what?  Other parts of the country are way ahead of you, in that regard.  Deal with it.

Climate Propaganda Cabals Ramp Up the Heat for Summer.  [Scroll down]  They will be pumping this junk out all summer — telling us that summers are hot.  We already know that.  If you can tell the difference between a 90°F day and a 91°F day without a thermometer, or without a "climate journalist" to tell you that that "one more degree" is caused by driving your classic '55 Chevy to the summer car show, you are a better person than I.  They are collaborating, they are conspiring — both in the open and behind closed doors — and they are will say anything they think the public will swallow.

The Mirror goes mega-viral for saying UK will be "blasted" by 78°F "heatwave".  [Scroll down past several advertisements and tweets]  It's headed to 93°F today in Michigan, where I have the inexhaustible pleasure of writing this article.  We have moose that reside in our state.  They don't seem to mind the occasional hot day.  [Advertisement]  Meanwhile, Brits apparently melt if the mercury rises above room-temperature.

Top Study Confirms UN's 'Climate Crisis' Claims Are a Hoax.  A top study has confirmed that fearmongering claims made by the United Nations (UN) to support the "climate crisis" narrative are a hoax, directly contradicted by data.  Despite claims from the UN and other unelected globalists, the study has found that alleged "climate disasters" are not increasing.  In fact, eminent Italian researchers Gianluca Alimonti and Luigi Mariani found that the environment has been significantly improving in recent years, with climate-related events decreasing.  However, the researchers found that, while "climate disasters" have been decreasing, fearmongering studies and corporate media reports linking "global warming" to weather events have increased dramatically, creating the illusion of a "crisis."  The study observed trends in climate disaster reports between 1900 and 2022.

Stop Making Plane Turbulence About Climate Change.  Passengers "smashed" into the ceiling, blood stained the carpet in the aisles, luggage flew through the cabin, and there was "awful screaming": Is what happened on a Singapore Airlines jet on Monday evening going to become a regular occurrence?  The plane, which was flying from London to Singapore, reportedly encountered "severe turbulence" about 10 hours into the flight, while 37,000 feet above southern Myanmar.  Multiple passengers were injured — 20 were still in intensive care this morning — and one man died:  a 73-year-old British citizen who appears to have gone into cardiac arrest.  Within hours of reporting the incident, major news organizations were wondering:  Will this be the new normal, in the age of global warming?  "Is climate change making turbulence worse?" asked the BBC.

Now We Are Supposed to Cheer Government Surveillance?  They are wearing us down with shocking headlines and opinions.  They come daily these days, with increasingly implausible claims that leave your jaw on the floor.  The rest of the text is perfunctory.  The headline is the takeaway, and the part designed to demoralize, deconstruct, and disorient.  A few weeks ago, the New York Times told us that "As It Turns Out, the Deep State Is Pretty Awesome."  These are the same people who claim that Trump is trying to get rid of democracy.  The Deep State is the opposite of democracy, unelected and unaccountable in every way, impervious to elections and the will of the people.  Now we have the NYT celebrating this.  And the latest bears notice too:  "Government Surveillance Keeps Us Safe."  The authors are classic Deep Staters associated with Hillary Clinton and George W. Bush.  They assure us that having an Orwellian state is good for us.  You can trust them, promise.  The rest of the content of the article doesn't matter much.  The message is in the headline.

No, Sun Sentinel, Florida Isn't Under Future "Climate Threats".  A recent article in the South Florida Sun Sentinel (SFSS) newspaper, titled "Florida in 50 years:  Study says land conservation can buffer destructive force of climate change," makes some catastrophic claims about what Florida's climate will be like in 50 years.  The article relies heavily on climate model projections, that are undermined by real world evidence and by the fact that the climate models in question have been shown to create "implausibly hot forecasts of future warming."  As outlined in Climate at A Glance:  Climate Model Fallibility peer reviewed science has shown that climate forecasts like the one cited by the SFSS have no basis in reality because comparisons of actual measured atmospheric temperature data to model forecasts show up to a 200% discrepancy between model temperature outputs and observed temperatures.  Because the temperature forecasts are wildly implausible, the claimed disastrous impacts that are forecast to result from those unbelievably high temperatures also lack credibility.

BBC weather map row heats up over confusing colours.  The BBC has been criticised for the colour scale it uses to represent temperatures, with lows of 11C shown as yellow while 41C is depicted as dark red.  The broadcaster has triggered confusion among some viewers with its temperature contour map, which switches to orange when temperatures hit 13C.  The colour scheme was introduced in 2017, with the BBC at the time saying it was intended to help those with colour blindness.  Toby Young, the founder of website The Daily Sceptic, suggested that the BBC was "going a bit far".  "How is it going to represent temperatures above 20C?  Fireballs?" he said.  A weather forecast on Tuesday night showed most of the country yellow and orange for Wednesday when temperatures were predicted to hit as high as 20C.  One viewer wrote on social media that the system was "utterly farcical".  "I'm not a massive conspiracy theorist but I have to agree with those who castigate the utterly ludicrous use of bright yellow and orange/red on the weather maps to indicate temperatures of 18/19 degrees!" the viewer wrote.

The Editor says...
When television was received on black-and-white receivers, 50 years ago, no consideration was given to "color blind" viewers.  We were all color blind.  At the same time, much less emphasis was placed on sensational (and highly speculative) forecasting beyond the next 24 hours, hardly any TV stations had their own weather radar, nobody had any delusions about the government being able to alter the weather, and absolutely nobody considered carbon dioxide to be a threat.

The Price of Surrendering Speech.  Our mainstream media has been surrendering its freedom for years, not by any dictate from the top but by a seismic shift in its values and self-perceived role in society.  The process started slowly, long ago, when publishers and editors discovered a gold mine in obsessing over celebrity heroes, then accelerated when they found that a celebrity villain offered the same rewards.  They learned to favor sensation over substance, never worried that their chosen villains are not always evil, nor their heroes always virtuous.  For them an off-color remark or over-the-top boast from one of their celebrities becomes more important than any substantive dialogue about policy. [...] The celebrity fixation justified, even required, hyperbole, since their stars need to be larger than life, meaning the media accords them vastly more authority, and credibility, than they deserve.  Eventually for the legacy media everything — from the climate cycle to devolution of rights to states, passage of school choice laws and scores of invented microaggressions — became existential threats.  George Bernard Shaw once complained that the media can't distinguish between "the end of the world and a bicycle accident."  Shaw was engaged in hyperbole when he spoke those words but they are no longer exaggeration.

Why are states and counties declaring emergencies for the solar eclipse?  [Scroll down past numerous tweets]  A lot of it is tied back to the creation of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in 1979 by President Carter.  The federal government doesn't have jurisdiction at the local level (in principle, at least), so local jurisdictions declaring emergencies is basically the first step of a formal invite for state and federal manpower to come in and help fix a particular problem.  Since we have super-short term memories, let me remind you that this happened for the 2017 eclipse too. [...] If there's a conspiracy here, it's the observation that using a process meant for true emergencies as a "Get out of Jail Free Card" for every inconvenience is really [read:  REALLY] bad for a free society that doesn't want rule by martial law.

The Editor says...
Solar eclipses happen every few years, but there has almost never been so much hype about an eclipse before.  The eclipse of August 21, 2017, was apparenly good for the news media, because they are really talking up this one, and that is what's causing "emergency" declarations all along the eclipse's path.

How is this not "hate speech?"
'The View' Co-Hosts Launch Into Lengthy Man-Hating Tirade.  "The View" co-hosts jumped into a lengthy man-hating tirade Friday, calling straight ones "useless."  The co-hosts responded to a TikTok trend asking women if they need men, agreeing with the majority who answered "no." They adamantly assured they are not including gay men in their criticism.  "Because men are useless," co-host Ana Navarro said.  "I mean — and by the way, I wanted to differentiate between straight men and gay men because I think I would die without gay men.  No one can gossip like a gay man, no one can help you accessorize like gay men, and nobody can help you from doing harm to yourself like gay men."  She said her husband would be "emaciated, starving and living in his own filth" without her.

Synthetic Controversy.  In media, including legacy/mainstream, social and other alternative media, controversy sells.  And it often seems like all media has become much more about sales than about sharing factual information.  Controversy generates clicks, re-posting, and message amplification.  The controversy can focus on either a substantial or a trivial issue.  In modern PsyWar, with its emphasis on censorship, propaganda, and psychological shaping or manipulation, facts and reality are increasingly irrelevant.  It is no longer necessary for the controversy to be fact-based.  We all know about the power of "fake news" to capture the attention of the general public, and in many ways it is far easier to drive views and clicks with unsupported statements and speculation than by doing the research necessary to comprehend a topic.  Facts can be difficult and inconvenient things, but when reality becomes defined by feelings and opinions rather than objective facts, then development and exploitation of false narratives becomes child's play.

Activist Media Outlets Run Cover for Fulton County DA Fani Willis, Claim Scrutiny Is Motivated by Racism.  It was only a matter of time before folks on the left began throwing race into the saga surrounding embattled Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis.  Activist media outlets have begun spinning the narrative that the criticism and scrutiny of the prosecutor isn't about her inappropriate romantic relationship with one of the prosecutors she hired to handle the election interference case against former President Donald Trump but about the color of her skin and her sex.  The New York Times and Associated Press have published pieces intimating that the furor over Willis' alleged corruption was due to racism and sexism and not the fact that she clearly engaged in a torrid affair with prosecutor Nathan Wade.  The only thing surprising about this is that it took them so long to begin weaving this narrative.

2023 Was Not the "Hottest Year on Record" for Over 70% of the World's Population, Data Show.  Further doubt has been cast on the widely-broadcast alarmist temperature claim that last year was the hottest since records began.  A deep dive into figures published by the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) reveals that the 'hottest ever' claims did not apply to large areas of the world including Asia, Europe, North America, Oceania, East N. Pacific, Hawaiian region, Arctic and Antarctic.  Investigative science writer Larry Hamlin notes in the science blog Watts Up With That that at least 58% of the Earth's land surface where 73% of the world's population lives did not experience the hyped 'highest ever recorded' average temperature anomaly.

Separating fact from fiction on 'climate change'.  Here are some legitimate scientific facts:  I was in Denver on December 23rd, 2023, and the national weather report was talking about how warm the country was; the temperature was 55°F, which was 12° above normal.  Then, the meteorologists showed that the record high in Denver for that date was 74° in 1901.  Then on December 24th and 25th, the high was around 30°, which was 13° below normal.  Here are the only truthful statements that can come from those facts.  Temperatures fluctuate, and Denver's temperature has been colder "than normal" on December 23rd for the last 122 straight years.

Hottest In 125,000 Years?  Just about all of the media have been peddling the "Hottest for 125,000 years" claim, which suggests a very concerted effort by the climate establishment in the run up to COP28.  The claim is self evident and baseless nonsense for a number of good reasons:
  •   There is no such thing as "a global average temperature"
  •   Even now we have very sparse coverage of temperature measurements.  Prior to satellites, we had virtually no data outside of the US, Europe and a few other built up areas
  •   The temperature record we do have is thoroughly corrupted by UHI, and only dates back to the late 19th C[entury]
  •   Natural variations, including ENSO, volcanic activity etc, can easily cause temperature swings of a degree Celsius from year to year, and decade to decade.  But historical proxies don't have the fine resolution to pick these up, they merely give an idea of average temperatures over decades and even centuries.  Consequently you cannot compare one year now with the general climate of, say, 2000 years ago.
But forget about all of these theoretical objections, because the climatic evidence we do have is overwhelming, and it tells us that the climate has been much warmer than now for most of the last 10000 years, since the end of the ice age.

Not the Babylon Bee.  What exactly a "climate disease" is is a mystery until you realize this term was invented to make a snappy headline.  In non-headline speak, these are diseases that are spread by more frequent interactions between people and wild animals driven out of their natural environment due to climate change.  Or they are diseases we are to believe are made more common due to climate change.  Color me skeptical.  Malaria, Dengue fever, and other diseases have been with us for millennia, and new diseases have been springing up throughout human history.

The Truth about the Jeffrey Epstein John Does.  There is a certain level of difficulty in reporting on the Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell saga, much of it having to do with what the authorities haven't revealed: the web of Epstein's network (much of it still secret), the ties to intelligence (of which documentary evidence is still hidden from public view), the internal deliberations that went on at Main Justice in Washington, D.C. when Epstein got his sweetheart plea deal (again, not yet publicized).  Add to that the false media reports and blatantly inaccurate social media posts that spring up every time there's any small development in any Epstein or Maxwell case.  Like today, for example.  The Daily Mail led the way, reporting that a federal judge "has ruled to unseal documents that would name 177 Does who are Epstein's friends, recruiters and victims within the coming weeks." This was followed by a flurry of social media takes — especially on Twitter — promising there will be serious revelations from these records or claims that "177 Jeffrey Epstein high profile associates will be revealed in the new year."  There's a problem with that sensationalism: it's inaccurate.

More media drumbeating on the global warming nonsense from USA Today.  We are told that the science is settled, that the last 160 years of our using natural resources have led to record high temperatures on Earth and that the ocean is rising to unsustainable levels.  [A recent] article from USA Today says the Earth used to be much hotter, so why do they tell us constantly that the Earth has reached record high temperatures and that we don't have much time to save the planet[?] [...] Of course, they never explain how the Earth cooled from 1940 [to] 1975 when they say all these things cause warming.  Facts haven't mattered to green pushers for a long time.  And of course, the solution is big government and taking away our freedom of choice of what we drive and how we power our houses and appliances.  We are supposed to capitulate to radical green pushers which makes us poorer and them much richer.

The Editor says...
How could the ocean be "rising to unsustainable levels?"  What's easier to sustain than sea level?

Globalists Fear the Unconquerable.  State-controlled news media blare continuous warnings that citizens should fear racism, "white supremacy," misogyny, imperialism, colonialism, paternalism, Christianity, Israel, hydrocarbon energy, heterosexuality, capitalism, exercise, Karens, Chads, Western civilization, personal liberty, country music, Southern states, suburban moms, political speech, scientific debate, masculinity, democratic elections that don't elect Democrats, Donald Trump, limited government, nuclear families, gun-toting Americans, psychologically healthy adults, Christmas decorations, assimilation, accurate history, cultural appropriation, national borders, due process for conservatives, misinformation, malinformation, disinformation, and stable marriages.  On the flip-side, the atheistic priests of the "woke" church insist that opposition to either gay pseudo-marriage or the new fad of "transgenderism" represents some kind of irrational "phobia" that must be overcome immediately.  In other words, the new world order demands that Westerners fear almost everything except bearded men crushing women half their size in competitive sports.  Talk about lunacy!

USA Today article seeks to gin up class hate.  There's apparently no end to how far the mainstream operatives will go in their quest to destroy the virtues of the West, and a USA Today article published last week is a prime example.  The man behind the piece, Daniel de Visé, essentially implies that anyone not born into tremendous wealth doesn't have a chance at success, and those who are rich only got that way by mere circumstance and birthright, overtly implying that capitalism has caused this problem and that, we must work harder for equality.  There are huge problems with de Visé's article, but I will do my best to tackle a few of them to explain how the premise is entirely wrong.

Climate Change Is Not Threatening Human Health.  The mainstream media has increasingly used words like "catastrophe" and "uninhabitable" to describe the condition of the planet.  This is despite the fact that data show weather is not getting worse.  Creating climate anxiety is explicitly the goal of media climate reporting.  Bombarding their audiences with scare stories, facts to the contrary be damned, is aimed at motivating people into "taking action" and supporting severe restrictions on fossil-fuel use.  Survivors of a natural disaster may also struggle with PTSD or similar ailments, but it doesn't mean that climate change is the cause.  VOA reporting that climate anxiety is a result of climate change itself is frankly disgusting.  In the end, objective scientific data does not show that human health is being negatively impacted by climate change, and it is certainly not the biggest health threat facing humanity.

This Summer Was Not Even in America's Top 10 Hottest, Say Scientists.  The mainstream media continue to fall hook, line and sinker for the tempting alarmist bait set by urban heat corruptions.  The Guardian said a record was set this year in the U.S. city of Phoenix during a "hellishly hot summer" with the most hot days over 110°F.  The BBC's report on Phoenix took the opportunity to add that heatwaves are becoming more frequent and intense, "because of human-induced climate change".  It is often hellishly hot in the desert state of Arizona, and in fact last summer was the warmest in Phoenix going back to 1933.  But strip out the heat created in the ever-expanding concrete and tarmacked metropolis, and it turns out the area was only the 11th warmest on record.  If the record hot summer in Phoenix was due to global warming, as claimed in almost all media, then it would show up at weather stations surrounding the city — "right?" asks Dr. Roy Spencer at the University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH).

ABC News:  Thanksgiving Dinner 'Could Soon Become Another Victim' of Climate Change.  Thanksgiving "could soon become another victim of climate change," a recent report by ABC News warned.  The report said rising temperatures "threaten the abundance and quality" of ingredients that make up a traditional Thanksgiving dinner.  "As a result, these essential food items could become increasingly scarce and more expensive, potentially forcing families to omit or make substitutions in key recipes on their Thanksgiving menus," the report said.

Joe Biden supporters had an especially paranoid couple of days.  It's amazing that this man was once a congressman, because he clearly has zero understanding of both political philosophies and the American political system — for the umpteenth time, fascism is a leftist ideology and America was never supposed to be a democracy — and on a recently-broadcast televised MSNBC segment, Joe Scarborough issued an ominous warning: if President Trump secures a second term, he will "imprison" and "execute" any and all political opponents that he can.  Projection much?  Who's really been imprisoning and executing political opponents?  Does the name Ashli Babbitt ring a bell?  What about Craig Robertson?  Owen Shroyer?  Or how about the J6ers?  Or, is this a signal of guilt?  Has he done something criminal and he's starting to sweat?  Talk about paranoia!  But it wasn't just Scarborough because Scary Larry, a prominent Twitter Democrat, announced that another Trump presidency meant an official Brownshirt squad, and Trump already had his gang ready to go:  [Tweet]

Another Long, Hot Summer.  [Scroll down]  Every year, it's "the sky is falling," until it's not.  Then, with egg on their faces, the forecasters crawl back into their studios and begin whining about another potential catastrophe, almost as if they're wishing one would happen.  I am genuinely happy that Idalia did so little damage and that casualties were so low.  I'm not sure the mainstream liberal networks were happy about it. [...] There was no flooding in my community despite our proximity to [Hurricane] Idalia's cone.  I sat comfortably in my house, reading and working, hardly aware that a hurricane was passing by.  We did not lose power, no trees were down, and there was no wind damage.  The reporters were getting wet, the signage around them was bending a bit, and their voices were full of manufactured urgency.  But there was no urgency where I sat.

Weather Channel map
The Weather Channel's Absurd 'Hot' Propaganda.  The Weather Channel is absolutely ridiculous.  The channel's "Weather Across the Country" map on their homepage for September 19 had red colors EVERYWHERE!  Because it's HOT HOT HOT!  No area of the country is experiencing normal weather for mid September, apparently.  Chicago, for instance, was displayed as red to deep orange.  Warm, right?  I can tell you from personal experience:  It was "freezing" on Tuesday, September 19 in Northern Illinois for a day that is still technically summer.  It rained all day and barely got over 60 all afternoon.  I regretted not wearing a jacket to the office.  On this map, Seattle is in "yellow/green" denoting cooler weather, but I can assure you that today in Chicago felt like Seattle ... and it probably felt a lot warmer in Seattle where The Weather Channel said, and showed with color, that it was significantly "cooler." [...] Minot, North Dakota was allegedly 86 degrees today and is in "cool" yellow.  Jacksonville, Florida is one degree higher at 87 and is in "deep red hot."

Ignoring History Means Choosing Windmills Over Whales.  What we do know is that the media will hysterically opine about climate change records.  Except that they'll be wrong (as always).  There's nothing exceptional about the current heat we're experiencing:
  •   Death Valley, California, holds the world-record temperature high:  A whopping 134 F measured on July 10, 1913.
  •   North Dakota hit its historic high of 121 F in 1936.
  •   Montana experienced its highest temperature of 117F in 1937.
  •   Despite being the USA's warmest state, Florida's record high is only 108 F, and that occurred in 1931.

Control Versus Choice.  COVID cases are up.  Hospitalizations climbed 24% last week.  But the media make everything seem scarier than it is.  The headline "Up 24%!" comes after dramatic lows.  Hospitalizations are still less than half what they were when President Joe Biden said, "The pandemic is over." [...] This month, several school districts in Kentucky and Texas closed.  "The safety and wellbeing of our students, staff, and community is a top priority," said the school superintendent in Texas.  But kids rarely get very sick from COVID, and schools aren't COVID hotspots.  Studies on tens of thousands of people found "no consistent relationship between in-person K-12 schooling and the spread of the coronavirus."  A Lancet study found Florida had the 12th-fewest excess COVID deaths in the country, even though Florida students went back to school without masks relatively soon.

Independent Journalists, the Frontline Workers in the War on Truth.  Truthful and comprehensive journalism is at the heart of whether we will continue to devolve, or whether we regain our national footing.  By their nature, journalists have a platform with the public, and a tremendous ability to influence it; people believing in and then acting on erroneous information yields destructive consequences.  In this way, journalists as a whole advertently support the interests of the Democrat Destroyers; think of the "every man for himself" hysteria stories or the suppression of the efficacy of certain medicinal drugs when COVID first appeared.

In California This Weekend, We Saw, Again, How Easy It Is to Panic Americans.  I am writing this column on a beautiful sunny day in Southern California.  It is a Monday in mid-August, so it is not a national holiday, yet in Los Angeles County, where I live, all the schools and all government offices are closed.  Why?  Because, for the past week, the National Weather Service, state and local authorities, and national and local media have been ceaselessly warning that a tropical storm would hit Southern California on Sunday night and Monday with a "life-threatening" intensity not seen since the last tropical storm hit California in 1939, 84 years ago. [...] Unlike the invisible COVID-19 virus, the reason for panic this time was completely visible.  All these people needed to do was walk outside of their home or hotel — or just look out the window.  Had they done so, they would have seen that steady but moderate rain was falling.  Just rain.  No high winds, no downpour, no storm, not even thunder or lightning.

'Global Warming' Morphs Into 'Global Boiling' as the Global Climate Hoax Turns Up the Heat.  On July 27, 2023, the United Nations turned up the heat on the global climate hoax by declaring "the era of global warming" has now morphed into "the era of global boiling." With typically hysterical rhetoric, UN Secretary-General António Guterres said that, "short of a mini-Ice Age" in the coming days, July 2023 would likely "shatter records across the board." [...] This all-too-obvious coordinated drumroll of frightening climate change warnings has become the propaganda technique of choice for international organizations who presume responsibility for controlling Earth's climate.  The only problem with the current theme of the month — namely, that July 2023 was the "hottest" month on record — is that it is NOT true.  But truthfulness is apparently a less worthy goal to the UN, the WMO, and the European Commission than making sure we stop using hydrocarbon fuels, the energy that has allowed modern industrial states to prosper during our good fortune to be experiencing an interglacial warming period.  The whole point of these announcements is to scare people.  "Climate change is here," the UN chief said.  "It is terrifying.  And it's just beginning."

The Editor says...
It's only terrifying if you watch TV, and believe everything you're told.  If you turn off the TV, it's just a hot summer.  Winter will be here soon enough.

Warming-obsessed media wrong again.  There is not much new about media hyperbole in weather reporting, but July's climate alarmism may be more breathless than usual.  Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn and other social media were inundated with posts containing flaming red maps of Southern Europe and Northern Africa.  [Several tweets]  "July 2023 will probably be the world's hottest month in hundreds, if not thousands, of years," said top NASA climatologist Gavin Schmidt.  One Twitter user (with 22,000 followers) claimed, "After the hottest day and week, we are now experiencing the hottest month ever (in about 120,000 years, based on paleoclimatology).  As we keep warming the planet, we will soon experience global temperatures not seen in the past million years!"  When questioned about the justification for his claims, the tweeter responded that scientists had "discovered there was a glacial period, which many people know about from a movie called Ice Age."  Imagine substantiating scientific claims by referencing a Hollywood movie!  Such is the sorry state of critical thought.

The press is trying to scare us about heat deaths to promote its global warming agenda.  We are supposed to be scared because 13 people, mostly older, died from heat in the current hot weather, and we are told that heat deaths are becoming more common. [...] Good journalists who care about informing the public, instead of indoctrinating them to push an agenda, would do some research to put the heat related deaths in perspective.  Sadly, the current crop of journalists seems much more interested in getting the public to capitulate to the radical green agenda to remake or destroy America, instead of informing them.  According to the CDC, the most recent data show an average of 702 people die from heat related illness each year.  To put that number in perspective, around 3 million people die each year from all causes, so less than three-hundredths of one percent of deaths each year are caused by heat.  How many of the 702 would have died from other causes that year?  My guess is, just like with COVID, they had other significant health problems?

'115 Degrees Fahrenheit' screams the New York Times headline.  But in point of fact, instead of seeking to scare people with high temperatures, most of the reporting lately talks about the heat index.  The purpose is to make people think it is warmer than it is. [...] If you Google the question: What is the highest heat index ever recorded, you actually get the highest actual temperature ever recorded which was 134 F. which occurred in Death Valley California in 1913.  A lot of other heat records occurred during the 1930's, so why do they keep telling the public that these are the hottest years on record and then claim that humans, cars, CO2, Coal, methane etc. have caused the high temperatures?

All Of A Sudden, Outbreaks Of Malaria, H5N1, Swine Flu And Monkeypox Are All In The News.  After a bit of a lull, it appears that pestilences are going to start making headline news once again.  Of course that is the last thing that many of us want to hear.  Many Americans are finally getting their lives back to normal after the last pandemic, and a lot of people are hoping that we won't have to go through another for a long time to come.  Unfortunately, the truth is that we have entered a period of history when major outbreaks will be quite common.  In secret labs all over the planet, mad scientists are monkeying around with some of the deadliest bugs ever known to humanity, and as we have seen, it is way too easy for an "accident" to happen.  One of the diseases that our scientists have been playing around with is Malaria, and now there are four confirmed cases in Florida and one in Texas.

Human groundwater usage causing earth to wobble?  According to the pajama boys over at thehill.com, a new study has found that humans have pumped so much groundwater out of the earth that the planet has begun to detectably wobble on its axis.  They admit the "magnitude of the new wobble is slight — a matter of millimeters, which puts it in the same approximate speed category as Earth's slowly drifting continents."  So, perhaps the wobble is actually related to the Earth's slowly drifting continents?  The Hill says the findings, recently published in Geophysical Research Letters, purport to "show the extent to which human action — in the form of dam construction, groundwater drilling, and the burning of fossil fuels — are impacting the very position of the Earth." [...] The "scientists" conducting the study allegedly found that, between 1993 and 2010, human society, largely due to agriculture, had depleted 2,510 gigatons of groundwater, the equivalent of half the volume of Lake Huron.  Half the volume of one lake?  Is that really that calamitous?

The Editor says...
The migration of the poles did not begin in 1993, and there is no reason to believe that human activity caused it.  More comments below.

Earth's tilt has changed by 31 inches thanks to humans — and it could make climate change even WORSE, study warns.  Our insatiable need for water may be keeping us alive, but it's shifting the tilt of the Earth, a new study shows.  Researchers in Korea say the removal of groundwater around the world for drinking and irrigation is altering the Earth's mass and in turn making its axis 'wobble'.  According to the team, we've shifted such a large mass of water that the Earth tilted 31 inches (78.5 cm) east between 1993 and 2010 alone.

The Editor says...
Socialists think you're really stupid.  Does anyone believe that anything we do could make the earth wobble?  Does anyone at the Daily Mail understand how big the Earth is, and how little 31 inches is by comparison?  Is anyone harmed by the migration of the poles?  Apparently the article above is sounding an alarm about a 31 inch peak-to-peak excursion over a period of 17 years.  What happened before 1993?  Is there any historical data showing that the poles did not migrate before the industrial revolution?  Even if everything in the article above is true, and it isn't, what would it take to stop the wobble a planet that has a mass of 5.9722 x 1024 kg?  The only reason to write an alarming newspaper article about a non-problem (that can't be fixed even if it is a problem) is deception:  If the writers can convince you that driving your car is destabilizing the whole world, they might talk you into giving up the freedom that your car represents, along with other freedoms.  I suspect the Earth has been wobbling since about 4,000 years ago, a couple of weeks after Noah got aboard the ark.  Note:  ["]The International Latitude Service was created by the International Geodetic Association in 1899 to study variations in latitude caused by polar motion, precession, or 'wobble' of the Earth's axis.["]  How many cars were on the road in 1899?  How many electric power plants were on line back then?

NBC's Chuck Todd Discovers That Black Teenagers Are Shooting Each Other.  Delivering statistics on gun deaths among teenagers, NBC News Chuck Todd discovers that black teenagers are killing each other at a much higher rate than white and asian kids.  Todd is shocked, shocked, at the outcome.  [Video clip]

The media's role in mass shootings.  The past few years have seen long stretches of calm, despite the propaganda from the biased and suspect "Gun Violence Archive," which seeks to label almost every petty crime incident as a "mass shooting" in the mind of the public.  On occasion, the peace is interrupted, with mass shootings taking place at predictable intervals after each miscreant from the previous shooting is elevated in the media to anti-hero status.  This is the well known and well studied phenomenon of media contagion, with each subsequent attack being predictable as clockwork.  So why aren't the nation's socialist media taking responsibility for its actions in causing these tragedies?  Why does it appear that they would rather exploit other people's pain for their political gain than save lives?

What's the Real Reason Political Anxiety Is So High?  [#1] Governmental power and control.  The only reason we have anxiety, stress, and worry about what happens in government is because the government is ridiculously, uncomfortably powerful.  If our political enemies (whoever they happen to be) take power, they could exert tremendous control over our lives.  So on some level, a bit of anxiety is reasonable.  [#2] It doesn't help that we're in the era of the 24-hour news cycle.  Media companies come in all shapes and sizes, from corporate juggernauts to independent journalists, and everyone is racing to publish news stories for the public to consume on a constant basis.  There is no more reading the morning paper; we are constantly bombarded with information.  Even if some of this information is positive, it's easy to become overwhelmed and feel anxious as a result.  [#3] Bad media incentives.  It's ironic that the very news organizations publishing stories about high rates of political anxiety are the same ones (perhaps) intentionally stoking those anxieties.  Media companies aren't necessarily incentivized to tell the truth or commit to quality journalism; instead, they're incentivized to get clicks and attention.

Perpetual pessimism:
Huge Rain Finally Comes to Drought-Stricken California, Media Predictably Moans.  It should be good news:  large rainstorms have been dumping huge amounts of rain and snow on the drought-plagued Golden State, and much more is expected.  After draconian water restrictions were placed on many residents last summer — with many forced to watch their lawns disintegrate into a crispy death — one would think all this water would be welcome.  But if you read a lot of the media out there, you'd think storms were a bad thing; we should get rain and snow — just on our terms, not the weather's.

Don't Let Police, Media Mislead You About Fentanyl Exposure Overdoses.  Once again, media outlets are rushing to sow panic by blindly accepting a police department's claims that an officer may have accidentally overdosed by being in close physical proximity to fentanyl, reinforcing the false message that you can potentially overdose on the drug even if you don't intentionally consume it.  This time we head to Tavares, Florida, where the Tavares Police Department distributed to the local press body camera footage of Officer Courtney Bannick appearing to collapse and pass out after encountering what turned out to be fentanyl and meth in a rolled-up dollar bill she found in a routine traffic stop.  Local news outlets lapped it up (the story, not the fentanyl) and the video footage ran on WESH (the local NBC affiliate), FOX 35, and elsewhere.  In none of the initial stories does anybody so much as question whether what they're seeing is actually being caused by exposure to fentanyl.

"Some of the Worst" News Media.  About 15 years ago I co-authored a book about air pollution and the Clean Air Act.  I know — you'll just have to contain your excitement.  One of the things we found was an example of what might be called the reverse Lake Wobegone Effect, i.e., according to local media every local area had "some of the worst" air pollution in the whole country!  Every metro area was below average!  Of course, if every place has "some of the worst" of anything, then no place really does (as the government's air quality data bear out*). [...] Actual EPA data shreds these claims, but environmental advocacy groups (especially the American Lung Association's annual "state of the air" report) produce cookie-cutter press releases claiming that each local area suffers "some of the worst" pollution in America, and the media dutifully repeats these claims.  This is why most environmental "reporters" are really just stenographers for environmentalists.  This ought to be embarrassing for any serious editor or publisher, but there aren't many serious editors or publishers any more.

11 Years Ago, Democrats Got Everything Wrong.  They Are Doing It Again.  On January 8, 2011, shortly after 10:00 AM, Democrat Representative Gabby Giffords and 18 other people were shot.  Six died.  Within minutes, every form of media was set ablaze with speculation. [...] By early afternoon, Jared Loughner a white male, had been identified as the shooter.  Loughner was instantly linked to neo-Nazis and white supremacists.  He was linked to the Tea Party and then to the "right wing" generally. [...] By mid-afternoon, a graphic with crosshairs "targeting" Democrat districts was shown on CNN, MSNBC, Huffington Post DailyKos, and dozens of other shows and internet sites about every 30 seconds.  The map, they loudly claimed, was definitive proof that Sarah Palin's PAC map had incited Loughner.  Palin was to blame.  The right was to blame.  All Republicans were to blame.  By nightfall, the torches were lit and the pitchforks were out. [...] Almost nothing media initially reported was accurate.  Palin had nothing to do with Loughner's personal grudge against Giffords.  Within weeks, America knew conclusively that Loughner never saw Palin's target map, and that "target maps" have been used for decades.

Hurricane Hysteria, Hype, and Histrionics.  Hurricane season is upon Southeastern America and that means hair-on-fire hysteria from the media and the political left.  After Hurricane Ian ravaged southwest coastal Florida, we have heard nothing but hype from the corporate media, eager to connect every hurricane to catastrophic global warming, climate change, or whatever excuse they are currently using to usher in the Green New Deal and tyrannical top-down control of all aspects of our lives.  Hurricanes are not new and are a staple of southern coastal regions since long [ago].  Yet judging from media histrionics, severe hurricanes are only a recent phenomenon, ignoring hundreds or thousands of years ago when Florida was nothing but a swamp.  Hurricane harpies in the media, practicing one of the Democrats' favorite strategies of never letting a crisis go to waste, were quick to pounce on tragedy for political gain.  Look at some of the headlines, all singing in perfect harmony. [...]

While Reporters Crowded Around Biden's Airport, 12 Suspected Terrorists Were Caught At The Actual Border.  Think America's legacy media can't get any worse at their job?  Think again.  Following reports that Gov. Ron DeSantis, R-Fla., would be sending a plane full of illegal immigrants to a local airport in Georgetown, Delaware, near the residence of President Joe Biden, reporters and self-proclaimed journalists flocked to the location of the supposed drop-off on Tuesday, waiting with bated breath for an event they could spin to fit their anti-GOP agenda.  The only problem for the press, however, was that the plane in question wasn't carrying migrants and didn't even land in Delaware.  As reported by left-wing NBC News, "by late Tuesday, no plane had arrived [in Delaware]" and instead "landed in Teterboro, New Jersey," with no migrants "aboard the plane."  "Earlier in the day, DeSantis stoked the coals of speculation by declining to confirm or deny whether the plane would even take off — his administration later refused to say if the plane that landed in New Jersey was part of his program to relocate migrants — in an intentional effort to keep the issue alive," the NBC report claimed, citing an unnamed, anonymous source as evidence of its assertions.

MSNBC Praises 'War Hero' Biden Who Was 'Chopping Wood' in the Mountains 'Til His Country Called.  Do you envision Joe Biden as a war hero?  Do you see him shirtless and sweaty, axing oak for the fire he's busting at the biceps to build?  From the sound of things on MSNBC, it wouldn't be wrong.  Last week on Deadline: White House, host Nicolle Wallace welcomed network contributor and Morgan State University journalism Professor Dr. Jason Johnson.  Discussion turned to the Charlottesville conflict of August 2017, during which a man drove his car into a crowd.  Horrifically, he killed one person and injured several others. [...] Did Joe Biden — who previously held no interest in ascending to the land's highest office — see the shock of Charlottesville as a sign he had to suit up and save America?  It seems Dr. Jason believes so.

Is Extreme Weather Causing the World's Rivers to Dry Up?  A recent CNN article entitled "The World's Rivers are Drying Up from Extreme Weather.  See How 6 Look from Space" purports to argue that rivers such as the Colorado, Yangtze, Rhine, Po, Loire, and Danube are dwindling due to "a painful lack of rain and relentless heat waves." [...] Let's start close to home.  The Colorado River is cited as the first example, and, although CNN attributes its drying to the "historic drought in the US West," they do not suggest that this drought is human induced.  They do mention, however, that "around 40 million people in seven states and Mexico rely on the river's water for drinking, agriculture and electricity."  But an evaluation of the current conditions from the USGS National Water Dashboard indicates, as shown below, that many stream gauge stations in western Colorado and Utah are near normal, and in New Mexico and Arizona, they are above and much above normal.

The vast majority of pharmacology, psychiatry, vaccine science and published research is a complete fraud.  [Scroll down]  As a hilarious example of the junk science lunacy of the climate cult, look no further than the corporate-controlled media which now claims that every country in the world is heating up faster than every other country in the world.  Such a claim is mathematically impossible, yet it has become the default lunatic claim of the climate cult media, regardless of its incomprehensible nature.

CNN'S 'Climate Correspondent' Predicts All Life on Earth Is About to End.  Nearly all media cooperate in disseminating climate change fear-porn.  When hot months come because the northern hemisphere is closer to the sun, temperatures go up.  Changes in temperatures are reported in media with alarm and always denoted on graphics in blood red.  A few days ago, I saw this graphic of July temperatures in Europe.  The split screen shows different colors, although the temperatures are just about the same.  The replies were swift to point out that other stations reported hot weather temperatures as a red graphic in 2017.  In any event, the effect of coloring land in red is to cause people to feel the emotional burn.  Feel the fear.  [Tweet]

NBC Panics Over Climate Change, Blames Manchin for Blocking Biden.  On Monday's NBC Nightly News, after spending the first five minutes of the broadcast panicking over a heat wave in the middle of July, anchor Lester Holt and correspondent Anne Thompson chalked the warm weather up to "climate change" and sought to blame Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) for blocking the Biden administration's radical climate change agenda which would drive inflation up further by pumping more money into the economy.  "This severe weather certainly underscoring the increasing role of climate change and the challenges America faces in trying to combat it," Holt whined before turning to Thompson to give her report.

Weather map colors
Weather forecasts now use a deep, dark red to represent glorious sunshine.  Why?  People are starting to notice some, uh, less-than-subtle psychological conditioning rearing its head in modern weather forecasting.  What was once the smiley, happy face of the sun letting us know we could strip off and run through the neighborhood sprinklers [...] has been replaced with the deepest, darkest red that corporate media graphics departments can create, designed to summon forth notions of hell on Earth.  Observe, back in 1995 — when "John Kettley was the weatherman, [...] — a temperature of 30 degrees celsius was reflected with a gentle orange.  That's 86 degrees to you Americans.  Or "sweater weather" if you're in Arizona.  It wasn't a deep orange.  It wasn't an offensive orange.  It wasn't even as orange as a former President freshly emerging from his tanning bed.  No, by July 2022, the same temperatures (30 degrees), at the same time of year, are reflected with the most sinister red you could imagine.


Can a Crisis Happen If No One Pays Attention?  It's hard to pay attention to fake crises when there's a real economic crises.  Politics as entertainment is most appealing to those who are basically comfortable and aren't worried about basic bread and butter issues.  That's now a smaller demographic than it used to be.  There's also a shortage of actual crises.  People are worried about crime, the actual everyday kind that they might experience, as opposed to the abstract "we need gun control because of occasional mass shootings" agitprop.  The number of actual people whose lives have changed or will change because of the Dobbs decision is tiny.  On the other hand, people are canceling summer plans, moving and scrimping because of crime and the economy.  The pandemic actually affected a lot of people, the current wave of political crises does not.

L.A. Times' 8 'Bombshells' from Hutchinson Testimony Are All Duds.  The establishment media treated the testimony Tuesday of former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson at the January 6 Committee as if it were damning for Trump — before her claims began to fall apart.  The fact that Hutchinson was seen actually hugging members of the January 6 Committee, as if they were partners in some joint enterprise rather than investigators seeking the truth, ought to have raised red flags — but did not, until it was too late.  The Los Angeles Times, among others — including Fox News — set aside the basic rules of journalism, accepting as fact the sudden claims made by a witness whose testimony was based entirely on hearsay and who was never subject to cross-examination.  The Times published a list of what it called eight "bombshells" — some of which were soon debunked, some of which remain dubious, and some of which were just a repetition of things that were already common knowledge or that other witnesses had already told the investigation.

Just 5% call abortion [their] top concern.  Abortion, the No. 1 concern in today's media and politics, ranks nearly dead last among areas voters care about as they struggle with paying daily bills, soaring inflation, and interest rate hikes, according to a just-released survey.  While the Supreme Court's decision overruling the 1973 Roe v Wade right to abortion has dominated today's network and cable coverage, the latest McLaughlin & Associates poll said just 5% of voters call it a top concern.  Just below abortion, at 1%, is reviewing the 2020 election, over which the media are also obsessing.

The Hysterical Media Reactions Flow Immediately After Overturning of Roe v. Wade.  As Redstate reported, in one of the biggest and most impactful stories of the last 50 years, Roe v Wade has been overturned by the US Supreme Court.  The leaked draft decision that pushed conversation and outrage for the last several months was real, and it has now been made official.  States now have the right to regulate the brutal practice of abortion as they see fit, a move toward respect for human life and basic morality we haven't seen in this country since slavery was abolished.  It's hard to overstate how big of a day this is for those who have fought so diligently to protect the lives of unborn babies.  No, this doesn't provide a federal ban on abortion, but it does ensure that the federal government can no longer dictate to Americans and their state representatives that they must legalize and support such barbarism.

January 6 committee has hired a former ABC News executive to produce Thursday's 8pm hearing as if it is a blockbuster documentary, report claims.  A former news executive has been recruited by the House select committee investigating the January 6 attack on the US Capitol to produce the Democrat-led panel's upcoming primetime hearing, a Monday [6/6/2022] report claims.  James Goldston is a former president of ABC News.  Before that he ran the mammoth-sized operations at Good Morning America and Nightline as executive producer.  And he's now an adviser to the group of lawmakers who are set to present their case that Donald Trump's efforts to undermine democracy culminated in the deadly events of January 6, according to Axios.

Journalist Tries to Crash Uvalde Victim's Funeral, Bikers Have a Different Idea.  The funerals for those killed in the tragic school shooting that occurred in Uvalde, TX, have started to take place.  That comes amidst the relentless politicization of the event by the left and the media — despite the fact that in such a moment, there's typically nothing a family wants more than privacy.  Yet, a "health reporter" from The Houston Chronicle (again, trying to politicize what happened), attempted to crash one memorial in order to take pictures.  Fortunately, a group of bikers, who were there providing security, had other ideas.

The media's role in creating mass shooters gets less attention than it deservesPolitico published an interview last Friday with two criminologists who have studied mass shootings.  Jillian Peterson is a professor of criminology at Hamline University and James Densley is a professor of criminal justice at Metro State University.  Together, they've created a database of mass shootings since 1966 along with a detailed life history of 180 shooters.  Their research points to a number of commonalities among them.  Right away, they highlighted the role of the media and social contagion in these events, suggesting a connection between the Buffalo shooting and the one in Uvalde.

Mass Shootings: The Media Misinformation Campaign.  If there is any maxim religiously observed by the corporate news media, it is this:  "If it bleeds, it leads."  Moreover, if the blood in question gushes from gunshot wounds inflicted by a deranged mass murderer, the major news outlets uniformly portray the crime as evidence of an ever-increasing wave of violence caused not by criminals but by their weapons.  This narrative is a textbook example of misinformation whereby news organizations studiously ignore data and definitions on mass shootings developed by Congress, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and other law enforcement sources.

Was Canada's orgy of self-recrimination over...nothing?  Last year, Canada began an orgy of self-recrimination when researchers claimed to have found a mass grave at a residential school in British Columbia with the remains of more than 200 indigenous children.  The problem is that the ground-penetrating radar used to make this "find" yielded highly suspect results and not a single grave has been confirmed through an archaeological dig.  Now, a group of dissident scholars is calling foul on this entire narrative.

Time Mag is Wrong, Climate Change Will Not Make Food Scarce.  A Time Magazine article ascribes the potential for a major food crisis to two sources:  the war in Ukraine and climate change.  Concerning the latter claim, Time is simply wrong.  While the war in Ukraine and sanctions on Russian exports have had an impact on food prices, there is no evidence climate warming has or will harm food production worldwide.  The Time piece, titled "The Food Crisis Can't Handle Ukraine War and Climate Change," says the current high grocery prices are merely a sample of an even worse crisis to come.

Pulitzer Prize-Winning Health Journalist Revealed the Real Purpose of Masks in 2018: Fear.  Pulitzer Prize and Peabody Award winning journalist Laurie Garrett gave a refreshingly honest and clear-eyed assessment of the usefulness of masks in fighting coronavirus pandemics.  Unfortunately, her assessment, given as the Keynote Address at the National Academy of Medicine in December 2018, was given prior to the Covid-19 outbreak.  Garrett, a Council of Foreign Relations member, spilled the beans in a presentation called "From the 1918 Influenza Pandemic to 2009 H1N1 Pandemic to Now:  Is the World Ready to Respond to the Next Outbreak?"  After her presentation, which periodically cast doubt on the historical utility of general public masking around the world, she fielded a question from a member of the audience on such measures.  This was her candid response.  [Video clip]

CNN Claims Pro-Life Supporters Will Turn Violent with SCOTUS Victory, Amish Extremists now Threatening ANTIFA Peacekeepers.  This example is just another example of how the Ministry of Truth operates.  Political violence is speech, unless actual speech is heard from their opposition; then, it becomes violence.  War is peace.  Water is dry, etc.  George Orwell sighs.  Knowing there is an increased likelihood of violence incited by far-left democrat activists and the White House, CNN moves their advance narrative engineering team into place to lay the blame for violence at the feet of their political opposition.  With Roe v Wade potentially being overturned, Amish extremists are now going to lay siege to the peaceful assembly of ANTIFA in DC, or something equally stupid.  [Video clip]

Was the Alito Opinion Leak a Distraction?  This Conservative Radio Host Thinks So.  According to Wayne Allan Root, a conservative radio host who is also a brilliant writer, it was the result of something more sinister:  it's meant to be a distraction from the bombshell that Dinesh D'Souza dropped in "2000 Mules," his documentary about the voter fraud that he contends took place in 2020. [...] While a good point, Root isn't the only one claiming that this is a coverup, with others saying that the leak was actually an attempt to cover up the recently released Pfizer vaccine data, another sacred cow for the mainstream media, social media censors, and leftist Fauci-enthusiasts.

NBC Host Suggests Republicans Are Nazis.  Elon Musk slammed NBC News on Monday [5/2/2022] in response to a rant from a far-Left MSNBC host who claimed that Musk bought Twitter and turned it over to "the far-right."  MSNBC's Mehdi Hasan, who has compared non-Muslims to "cattle," tried to downplay America's far-Left by claiming that they only want to "give us free health care and free childcare" while claiming that the far-right "wants to give us white supremacy and no democracy."

CNN Analyst Melts Down Over Musk's Purchase of Twitter.  The same leftists who claimed social media isn't censoring conservatives are melting down over Elon Musk's decision to buy Twitter.  Elon Musk purchased Twitter for $44 billion dollars last week and the left is not taking it well.  Musk has stated that he believes 'free speech' on social media should match the law of the country.  "I am against censorship that goes far beyond the law," Musk said.  The Biden Regime is so frightened over Musk's decision to buy Twitter that they responded by creating an Orwellian, unconstitutional "Ministry of Truth."  Twitter censored the Hunter Biden laptop story shortly before the 2020 election so Joe Biden is working overtime to make sure he has full control over the internet.

The Media's Latest Attempt at Creating Another COVID Panic Is Beyond Pathetic.  Unlike liberal America, everyone has learned to live with COVID.  It's endemic.  It's going to be here forever.  Haven't had COVID, you're lucky.  You might get it; you have the rest of your life to catch 'rona.  Others who've had it should be prepared to get it again.  It is what it is, folks.  It's the latest edition to cold and flu season; COVID will just be the third person at the party.  It's seasonal.  Get over it.  Take your stupid mask off.  We have therapeutics and vaccines.  The era of lockdowns is over.  Philadelphia idiotically reinstated their indoor mask mandate.  NO ONE followed suit which shows you where everyone is now.  The upcoming 2022 elections have also played a part. [...] And these clowns wonder why everyone is sick of this circus.  It's damaged kids psychologically beyond repair.  The mental health crisis for adolescents is going to be a nationwide epidemic, but at least they wore masks, right?  Liberals' abuse of children in schools over COVID shouldn't shock anyone.

It was Watergate until it wasn't.  During the Trump presidency, I observed the following rule about breaking news, especially negative ones about President Trump.  I would hear the news and wait a day or two.  Why?  Because there was a good chance that the news would turn out to be fake news.  The latest example was the famous "phone time gap."  Where was President Trump during those hours?  Was he hiding in the basement planning the attack on the Capitol?  The media went crazy, from another round of experts to outrageous speculation.  Some even brought up the tired line about this being "worse than Watergate."  How did it turn out?

Oops! Another 'walls closing in' narrative about Trump hiding phone records with a 7-hour 'gap' falls apart.  A couple days ago, the press was wildly celebrating the demise of Donald Trump over Jan. 6 matters.  They breathlesslyclaimed there was a seven-hour stretch of congressionally subpoenaed phone records that was missing from the White House transcripts on Jan. 6. It had to have been removed.  There had to be a coverup!  It's the coverup that'll getcha.  The walls were once again closing in on Trump.  Gotcha. [...] Worse than Watergate, they hollered.  Except that ... oops, they actually found all of the tapes.  There was no gap.

What the Forever Crises Are Really About.  Thomas Hobbes wrote that people are willing to surrender their liberties to government out of fear.  Fear is what compels us to flee to the foot "of the mortal god" that is the state for the promises of protection and security.  Free us from the danger of harm is the impetus of the slow growth of authoritarian government that becomes totalitarian government over the course of time: government's totalizing control over all aspects of our lives.  And what has the century of perpetual crisis revealed?  Precisely this.  If we consent to the government solution in all these crises, we will be free from the danger and harm that threatens our lives.  So we are inundated by the media and the rhetoric of our politicians with the constant threats which rely on a sense of fear to surrender our liberties.  If we do not, then they employ the fear of social and moral shaming:  how dare you not have compassion for your neighbor or grandma!

Another 'Walls Are Closing on Trump' Story Has Collapsed.  How many of these stories do we have to endure from the liberal media before they understand that Donald Trump is not going to be indicted on anything.  The "walls are closing in" stories are too many, but each one has the same ending:  Trump wins.

Former News Executive Reveals the Government 'Warning' Given to Networks to Air Covid Propaganda.  The Covid pandemic response beginning in 2020 was one of the most sweeping cases of media propaganda in world history.  Governments not only lied to the masses ("15 days to slow the spread," e.g.) and made dubious claims based on poor evidence ("mask up" to end the pandemic), but it censored even civilians for doubting the mainstream narrative.  Now, a former news executive at international network Sky News, as well as a veteran of ITV, has come forward to reveal what news audiences have only previously been able to surmise:  Some news networks must have been ordered to adhere to the government's pandemic narratives or risk serious consequences (such as losing broadcasting licenses and other reprisals).  Mark Sharman revealed his disturbing insights into the astoundingly coordinated media coverage of the Covid pandemic in a sit-down interview on British channel GBN's "The Lockdown Inquiry" with host Dan Wootton.

Anyone Else Starting to Get a Bad Feeling About All This Ukraine Worship?  Two things can be true at the same time:  Ukraine is being mauled by vicious invaders, and globalists are laying the foundation to leverage this crisis that they've been building up for months.  The alacrity with which the establishment has thrown its full weight behind the plucky Ukrainian rebels is setting off all my alarm bells. [...] I know a stampede when I see one.  We're still in the death throes of the last one, COVID-19.  Before that, it was Black Lives Matter.  There was also the dreaded Jan. 6 "Insurrection" and Russian Collusion in there somewhere.  The ruined lives, fraud, wealth transfers, and costly infrastructure from those pushes are still stacked up all around us, but Big Global has such an effective machine in operation at this point that they can keep hitting us with ginned-up crises before we have a chance to clean up the mess from the last ones.

The Truth About Biden's Fake War With Russia.  Biden tried to be FDR and failed at that.  Now he's settling for playing a senile elderly JFK.  If you watch 5 minutes of CNN or any cable news network, you might believe that we're on the verge of war with Russia.  That's what the same people who claimed that President Trump was working for Putin want you to believe.  Their new war with Russia is as real as Russiagate.  Democrats want to fight Russia to the last Republican.  They aren't about to fight a real war.  Their fake wars with Russia are an attack on Republicans.  Russiagate came after Democrats spent eight years giving Putin everything he wanted as Hillary toted a Reset Button from a swimming pool and Psaki posed in a sickle and hammer hat.  And that was just what we knew about.

The Unbearable Racism of COVID.  The media like to say that "COVID has struck minorities harder than other races" or, as the Washington Post has it, COVID "ravages" minorities rather than other races.  This is a loaded and utterly dishonest statement, and one with racist undertones to boot.  First of all, COVID is not an agent that decides to "ravage" one race rather than another.  Actually, COVID does not "ravage" anyone.  One contracts COVID, as one would any other disease, and one does so in a number of ways and situations.  Second, there's that word "minorities."  By this the media do not mean minorities in the sense of those who constitute a minority of the population, as do all races, depending upon how and where they are counted.  What they mean are blacks and Hispanics, but primarily blacks.  And among blacks, they do not mean IBM executives or sports billionaires — they mean poor blacks.  The media goes out of its way to find individuals of partially African descent who are unsuccessful, and it then claims they are the victims of "systemic racism."  In truth, they are no more "victims" than is any one of us.  Every person alive has faced challenges.  Some have faced them and surmounted them; others have not.

"The View" Panel Accuses Clarence Thomas of Being a Race Traitor, Says 'He Doesn't Represent the Black Community.  What is Clarence Thomas?  An amazingly thoughtful and intelligent Supreme Court justice?  A hero of sorts that overcame the disadvantages of his upbringing, the prejudices of his time, and the damage done to his career by affirmative action and ended up at the very top of the legal system?  Well, yes, those are both correct answers.  But the jabbering parrots on "the View" didn't arrive at that answer.  No, according to those bitter, cackling hens, Clarence Thomas is a "race traitor."  Yes, they really said that.  Oh, and they implied that Amy Coney Barrett is a traitor to women.  Those comments, indicative of the hate-filled nonsense that suffused the entire segment, are both truly reprehensive and are quickly becoming mainstream thought on the left, which is firmly committed to the radical ideology of CRT and remains stuck on other grievance studies.

Danish Newspaper Apologizes For Publishing Official COVID Narratives Without Questioning Them.  In August, Germany's top newspaper, Bild, apologized for the outlet's fear-driven Covid coverage — with special message to children, who were told "that they were going to murder their grandma."  Now, a newspaper in Denmark has publicly apologized for reporting government narratives surrounding the Covid-19 pandemic without questioning them.  "We failed," reads the article's headline from tabloid Ekstra Bladet, which goes on to admit that "For almost two years, we — the press and the population — have been almost hypnotically preoccupied with the authorities' daily coronavirus figures."

Dr. Nicole Saphier throws cold water on media's 'flurona' fear mongering: 'It's no surprise'.  Fox News medical contributor Dr. Nicole Saphier appeared on the network's "Fox and Friends" Thursday to shed light on what some are calling "Flurona," a medical condition so named for those who have been diagnosed as having COVID-19 and the flu simultaneously.  Host Ainsley Earhardt laid out examples of the condition, noting that the CDC has reported only 79 cases of the double infection so far in the entire nation.  Dr. Saphier said, "I love the way that the media loves to sensationalize something, and I guess this will be our new headline for the next month."  She explained that the "Flurona" is not a new mutagenic or variant of the COVID virus, rather it's simply part of getting sick.

German Paper Apologizes for Scaring Kids With Panic-Driven Coverage of Covid.  In a shocking example of media honesty, the editor-in-chief of Germany's top newspaper, Bild, has apologized for the news outlet's panic-driven coverage of the China flu.  He specifically singled out children who were told "that they were going to murder their grandma."  Editor-in-chief Julian Reichelt videotaped his apology and told the children of Germany he was sorry for Bild's coverage, which was "like poison" and "made you feel like you were a mortal danger to society." [...] You won't see this in most news reports, but the Delta variant of COVID is less dangerous than the variant that China released in 2019.  It has caused far fewer deaths and hospitalizations.

Brilliant Video Shows How Media, Joe Biden and Govt Health Officials Drove the Omicron Fear Narrative.  The Omicron doom and fear narrative became a parody of itself.  One brilliant videographer has put together a mashup showing what took place in the past ten days.  It all started with ultra-progressive Harris County, Texas, Judge Lina Hidalgo holding a dramatic press conference to report that an unvaccinated man in Houston, who was in his 50s, had died from the omicron variant.  However, only one journalist actually called the hospital to check the claim and discovered what progressive Judge Lina Hildago claimed was actually false.  There was no unvaccinated 50-year-old man who died from Omicron in the hospital.  It was all made up by the judicial version of AOC.  Unfortunately, once the media, medical establishment and politicians had that press conference soundbite, from a judge — not a doctor, they were off to the races.  This video brilliantly shows what happened next.  [Video clip]

Inside the Omicron fear factory.  The official response to the Omicron variant provides a case study in the deliberate manufacture of fear. [...] We hear constantly that 1,300 people are dying a day from Covid.  By comparison, about 2,000 people die each day from cancer, and 1,600 from heart disease.  Their deaths get no coverage.  Covid was the leading cause of death in the US only in January 2021, even among those eighty-five and older.  Since then, it has ranked as the third most frequent cause of death both in the overall population and in the elderly.  To read the press coverage, however, you would think that nothing approaches Covid in fierce lethality and that all public resources should be directed to stopping its spread, no matter the costs to the education and socialization of children, to physical and psychological health, and to economic opportunity.

The Corporate Media Freakout Over The Omicron Variant Isn't Normal, It's Psychotic.  Omicron is here, and with it comes death and destruction — unless, that is, you cancel Christmas, hide in your homes, get all the boosters, double mask, and demand to see negative Covid tests and proof of vaccination for anyone who darkens your doorstep.  Any precautions, no matter how seemingly outlandish, are seen as justifiable to protect yourself from this new and terrifying variant.  So it is, anyway, with a disturbingly large number of reporters and commentators in the corporate press, whose coverage and individual responses to Covid have become increasingly divorced from that of the rest of America.  To watch CNN or read The New York Times, you'd think omicron was the most deadly strain of the virus to date, poised to overwhelm hospitals and leave a trail of death behind it.  The reality, which most Americans have readily grasped, is just the opposite:  Omicron appears to be the least dangerous strain of the virus yet.  After five weeks of omicron's spread in South Africa, where the variant first appeared, the news is encouraging: mild to nonexistent symptoms, hospitalization rates nine times lower than previous surges, and extremely low rates of severe illness and death even though only about a quarter of the population is vaccinated.  Here in the United States, only one person has died from the omicron variant thus far, even though omicron cases accounted for nearly three-quarters of new infections nationwide last week.

Professional sports again prove the folly of vaccines and 'COVID protocols'.  Some of the healthiest people on the planet are being managed by some of the dumbest people on earth.  According to Vice, the NFL is now a "COVID superspreader."  With the playoffs beginning in almost exactly one month, there are — as of this writing (the list has been growing daily) — nearly 100 (out of approximately 1700) players on the NFL's COVID-19 list.  Tellingly, Vice notes that "Sixty-five players have tested positive in the last two days, including a single-day record on Monday of 37 new cases."  So again we have an "outbreak" among those who've merely "tested positive" for the Wuhan Virus.  The Vice article goes on to mention how the NBA and the NHL are dealing with "outbreaks" of positive Wuhan Virus tests.  Without one mention of a player who's actually sick, seven times the Vice piece uses the phrase "tested positive" or a close derivative.  Several more times Wuhan Virus "test" or "testing" is mentioned.  No mention of hospitalizations, no mention of deaths, just "tests."  What's more, over 94% of NFL players are "vaccinated" (that definition keeps changing).

MSNBC's Heilemann Claims '30 Million People Right Now' Ready to Take Up Arms for Trump.  MSNBC network national affairs analyst John Heilemann said Sunday [12/12/2021] on NBC's "Meet the Press" that there were "30 million people right now who are ready to take up arms" for former President Donald Trump.

Actor Denzel Washington Infuriates the Leftist Media Because he Tells the Truth About Race in America.  Hollywood has avoided discussing racial issues with several black Hollywood actors for a long time, when they slip up and ask someone like Denzel Washington their race-baiting questions they quickly get destroyed.  Listen as time and time again the legend himself, Denzel, doesn't fall for the race-baiting and instead flips it back to people being individuals, not a collective as the commies and socialists in the USA are hoping for.  [Video clip]

PBS: Kids Are Justified in Feeling Panic Over Climate Change.  On Wednesday's show PBS NewsHour, anchor Judy Woodruff relayed results from a poll commissioned by PBS NewsHour and Generation Lab, finding that substantial percentages of children believe climate change will effect important life issues for them later on like having children or where they live.  The show then devoted eight minutes to the issue by showing a pre-recorded piece by correspondent William Brangham.  One high school student featured in the piece, Sofia Palau, recalled suffering from panic attacks, and having difficulty studying for the ACT because she kept thinking of the "impending doom."

The Editor says...
The main reason kids have any concern about the climate is that they've been soaking in alarmist propaganda dispensed by the public schools and outlets like PBS.  Today's world-wide average temperature is indistinguishable from 75 years ago.  There is no impending doom.  There is no crisis.  There is no emergency.  There is no reason to be afraid of carbon dioxide.  Many other things should be of greater concern than next year's weather.  Wasting taxpayer money on PBS, for example.

Chicago Tribune Throws Gas on 'Racism' Fire.  [Scroll down]  [The] "World's Greatest Newspaper" slogan later disappeared from the front page [of the Chicago Tribune] on December 31, 1976.  Had it not, this week would have prompted its immediate removal, as the 2021 lame version of the Tribune foisted an incendiary and poorly-sourced news item on readers with the headline "Study shows any contact with police may be detrimental to health, well-being of Black youth."  Call me crazy, but it seems to me that in a city that is already the undisputed Murder Capital Of America (thanks, Lori Lightfoot) and which this week actually saw demonstrators picketing and demanding the removal of the CEO of McDonald's for the "microaggression" of implying gangbangers may not make good parents... a newspaper throwing gasoline on the "racism" fire is probably the last thing any responsible publication would do. [...] The entire basis of this article is a "study" printed in September in the Journal Of The American Medical Association's Pediatrics Review... not exactly a voice of reason.

A Flood Of Superficial Climate Reports.  This past week, the Biden administration doubled down in its campaign against climate change with the release of a suite of four reports, on national defense, financial risk, homeland security, and migration.  These reports all start with the common premise that the climate crisis is now upon us in full fury.  Moreover, they also all insist that the issues at hand are nonpolitical, and that the objective at all times is "to be guided by the best available science and data."  To say the least, however, the claim looks hollow, given that none of these reports offers any data whatsoever to support its major contentions. [...] Sadly, instead of asking any hard questions, these reports just take the worst-case scenario for granted and move on.

The crafty language of climate alarmism.  When really bad, damaging weather hits it is normal to declare a federal disaster.  This which allows Federal agencies to take certain actions, including loans and tax relief.  This is done at the county scale.  So [The Washington Post] looked at all of the disaster declarations in the last three months and determined the cumulative fraction of the US population that lived in those counties. [...] The stretching begins when they report their study.  First we get the headline, which is all that most people will read.  Here is the main headline:  "Nearly 1 in 3 Americans experienced a weather disaster this summer"  This assumes that somehow every person living in every county "experienced" the local disaster.  The number of people that physically experienced these disasters is actually quite small.  In some cases, like flash floods, most of the county never knew it had happened until they heard the news.  In the hurricane cases a lot of people were not there, while others simply watched it rain really hard.  Losing electricity, while unpleasant, is hardly experiencing a disaster.

Media Test Positive For Corrupt COVID Coverage.  Policymakers and public health officials need to be held accountable for their miserable pandemic failures.  So should the media, which have no interest in objective news, and are following an agenda that is both repulsive and poisonous.  Among the media's favorite stories of the past 18 months are the deaths of the unvaccinated and those who expressed skepticism about the lethality of the Wuhan coronavirus.  A recent example is the death of a 40-year-old California woman, who, according to the British Daily Mail, "regularly posted anti-vax, anti-mask content, proclaiming herself a 'free thinker' who 'questions everything.'"  The mother of four — who also considered herself "unmuzzled" — "had been battling COVID-19 and resulting pneumonia ahead of her passing."  Tragic as her death was, it would not have been covered by the media had she been vaccinated and cheerfully compliant with lockdown and mask rules.  But in the twisted minds of most of today's journalists, it's a story that has to be told to boost their vanity.  They are our moral superiors.

ABC Takes Victory Lap After Smeared BP Agents Are Put on Desk Duty.  Border Patrol was already stretched dangerously thin but on Wednesday [9/22/2021], ABC's World News Tonight celebrated their job getting harder as multiple mounted agents were ordered to "administrative duties" after the rabid left and liberal media smeared them with lies about using "whips" on Haitian migrants.  As NewsBusters had documented all week, ABC anchor David Muir and correspondent Kenneth Moton were committed to parroting the ignorant White House talking point about how the images were "horrific."  "This scene along the southern border tonight.  Texas Governor Greg Abbott using state-owned vehicles to create what he's calling a 'steel barrier,' with the migrant crisis on the border.  And there is news tonight involving some of those Border Patrol agents seen on horseback, confronting migrants," Muir announced in his opening tease.

There Are No Bathrooms at the Border, and Other Shocking Revelations.  Molly Hennessy-Fiske of the Los Angeles  State Media  Times was literally shook to discover just how "dismal" things have become in migrant camps along the border.  I don't mean to make light of the harrowing conditions at the border.  Regardless of the cause, it's not nice to witness humans in peril, even of their own making.  What I am making light of is the L.A. Times and their ilk finding a "story" in the obvious and calling it news.  The very obvious truth is and has always been the same:  there aren't restrooms at the border.  It's not because the United States hates desperate immigrants or even desperate Haitian immigrants or the despotic coyotes who exploit them.  There are no bathrooms at the border because bathrooms don't belong in the middle of nowhere. [...] It obviously comes as a shock to people like Molly Hennessy-Fiske, who clearly have not spent much time in the middle of nowhere and thus do not understand that bathrooms don't grow in the wild.

Nicolle Wallace Tells Brian Williams Current Deadly Covid Surge is Like a 9/11 'Every Two Days'.  Anchoring coverage of 9/11 memorials on Saturday, MSNBC's Brian Williams and Nicolle Wallace discussed the historic significance of masks at the events and covid overall in comparison to the terror attacks of that terrible day.  Williams brought up the subject by way of mentioning the ever-present covid masks.  "Are you ever struck by the thought that on the 40th, 50th anniversary we will look back, perhaps, at some of these pictures and be reminded, oh, yeah, that's when we were all wearing masks?" he said to Wallace.  "That's when even our presidents and former presidents had to wear masks in public because of our uncontrolled pandemic in 2021?"  "Well, I think there are so many parallels to how much more difficult it is to do any of the things that anyone who has spoken today has done, to call the country to a higher purpose," Wallace replied.  "You've got politicians and prominent folks in the media outraged by steps that a president, not too many presidents after the one we heard from today, would try to save his country from an unthinkable death toll."

The Editor says...
[#1] There is no "uncontrolled pandemic."  If you turn off your television, you won't see sick people anywhere, and your life will return to pre-2020 normal in no time.  [#2] I'll take my chances with the relatively small "death toll."  Tyranny is worse than disease.  Diseases eventually go away.  Tyranny does not.

CNN Host, PBS Star Agree 1/6 Is As Big as the Civil War, World War 2.  As we have all learned from Joe Biden's presidency, the phoniest/baloney-est claim from liberals is that they have a deep desire for national unity.  There is no unity in compromise, only in surrender to the Left.  At the end of Sunday's [9/5/2021] Reliable Sources, fill-in host John Avlon interviewed the PBS gasbag Ken Burns, asking him about national unity, and he's as phony as Biden.  This is CNN, so Avlon demands unity in exaggerating the January 6 riot:  [Video clip] [...] How does anyone compare the January 6 riot to World War II or the Civil War?  It's like comparing Hiroshima to the Portland riots.  Liberals love to pose that they are against "partisan echo chambers."  They actually say this with a straight face on CNN... and on PBS.

It's the old "phony struggling against the wind" act.
Weather Channel Busted In Their Coverage Of Hurricane Ida:  Utility Worker Trolls Fake News Reporter.  On the 16th anniversary of Hurricane Katrina, some forecasters said Hurricane Ida would be as intense as last year's Laura and the Last Island Hurricane of 1856.  Both were among the strongest storms on record to make landfall in Louisana.  According to CNN, about half a million people were without power in the region. [...] The situation is already serious and there is no need for the media to make things [appear] even more serious.  A quick clip caught a man doing a cartwheel during Weather Channel reporter Jim Cantore's live shot on Sunday amid Hurricane Ida. [...] In another video, Jim is looking like he is on his last legs but the situation at the moment is probably not that serious as a utility worker trolls him.  [Video clip]

Chicken little is real.  A recent front-page headline in my local paper read as follows:  "County bordering on high virus transmission rate."  A doctor with a large regional health system was concerned that the COVID-19 transmission rate had increased by 37% in one week and stated, "A transmission rate above 5% from the prior week is very scary."  It seems useful to provide some context regarding numbers such as these, considering all the numbers being thrown around regarding COVID-19, the apparent push to create a panic over the Delta variant of COVID-19, the obvious push for everyone to get vaccinated, and the fact that the United States is ranked so poorly in math and science.  The first number to be considered is the 37% increase.  It certainly looked pretty bad, but percentages do not always provide an accurate picture.  The county-wide cases went from 11 to 15 during the week in question, an increase of four cases.  So, a 37% increase does not seem to be all that concerning given a population of over 91,000 people.

MSNBC Contributor Spews HATE: Fox News Is Al Jazeera, Trump Is Bin Laden.  Jonathan Capehart's Sunday show on MSNBC devoted a segment today [8/1/2021] to slamming Fox News for its coverage of the January 6th Capitol breach.  And NBC contributor Dean Obeidallah slimed Fox News as Al Jazeera and analogized Donald Trump to the greatest mass-murdering terrorist in US history.  When columnist Miami Herald columnist Leonard Pitts asked what people would sacrifice, Capehart responded by claiming that Fox News and Republicans on Capitol Hill "have sacrificed their soul."  A bit later, Capehart, somewhat out of left field, blurted out that "whiteness is a [...] drug."  But capping all the inane commentary was Dean Obeidallah.  He said that Fox News is "the Al Jazeera of America after 9/11."  Plumbing even more absurd depths, Obeidallah claimed that President Trump is "the Osama bin Laden of January 6th."

The Panic Pandemic.  The United States suffered through two lethal waves of contagion in the past year and a half.  The first was a viral pandemic that killed about one in 500 Americans — typically, a person over 75 suffering from other serious conditions.  The second, and far more catastrophic, was a moral panic that swept the nation's guiding institutions. [...] The panic was started, as usual, by journalists.  As the virus spread early last year, they highlighted the most alarming statistics and the scariest images:  the estimates of a fatality rate ten to 50 times higher than the flu, the chaotic scenes at hospitals in Italy and New York City, the predictions that national health-care systems were about to collapse.  The full-scale panic was set off by the release in March 2020 of a computer model at the Imperial College in London, which projected that — unless drastic measures were taken — intensive-care units would have 30 Covid patients for every available bed and that America would see 2.2 million deaths by the end of the summer.  The British researchers announced that the "only viable strategy" was to impose draconian restrictions on businesses, schools, and social gatherings until a vaccine arrived.  This extraordinary project was swiftly declared the "consensus" among public-health officials, politicians, journalists, and academics.

Dear Reporters:  The Capitol Riot Was Not 9/11, and the story is not about the media.  There is a faction of the news media that seems stuck on January 6.  They need to get some perspective.  And political hucksters who claim that the Capitol riot was worse than the September 11 attacks deserve all the derision they get.  One symptom of the January 6 fixation is a recent Vice article entitled, "'So, So Angry': Reporters Who Survived the Capitol Riot Are Still Struggling." [...] Get over yourselves.  The Capitol Hill press corps are not the first people to deal with a traumatic event and be expected to keep doing their jobs.  This was not the worst of those, and some of those other events were also wholly or partly the work of political actors.  Ask any of us who went through September 11.

Pandemics are staged on Television.  When a new epidemic is launched and promoted, despite the lack of good science and good evidence, it is jacked up on television screens.  Images begin to flow:  An emergency medical vehicle on a street.  EMT personnel, in hazmat suits, load a man strapped down to a stretcher, into the van.  On another street, a man collapses on the sidewalk.  We see a quarantined man sitting inside a huge plastic bubble on a third street.  Cut to an airport lobby.  Soldiers are patrolling the space among the crowds.  Cut to a lab.  Close-up of vials of liquid.  Camera pulls back.  Techs in light green scrubs are placing the vials into slots of a table-top machine.  Auditorium — a man on a platform, wearing a doctor's white coat, is pointing a wand at a large screen, on which a chart is displayed, for the audience.  Back to the street.  People are wearing face masks.  These images wash over the television viewer.  Meanwhile, the anchor is imparting his prepared meaning:  "The government today issued a ban on all travel into and out of the city... hundreds of plane flights have been cancelled.  Scientists are rushing to develop a vaccine..."  The television audience has an IMPRESSION of knowing something.

The Left Is Now Scaremongering The COVID 'Delta Variant'.  COVID-19 infection rates are down.  Deaths are down.  Vaccinations are up.  So what's the response from the left?  It continues a desperate attempt to scare the public and blame Republicans.  The left's bellwether outlet, the New York Times, perfectly sums up this agenda with a story headlined "Red America's COVID Problem," in which the Times writes that "COVID remains a serious threat to unvaccinated adults, especially those middle-aged or older" and that it's rising in Trump-supporting areas of the country where vaccination rates, they say, are lower.  "No wonder, then, that the number of new cases keeps falling in Biden counties, while it has begun to rise in Trump counties," the Times goes on.  The Washington Post's increasingly leftist "conservative" columnist Jennifer Rubin declares that "Red states are dangerous to America's health."

Washington Post reporter troubled by 'racist legacy' of some birds.  According to The Washington Post, it's hunting season for cancel culture and its latest targets are "racist" birds.  The Post ran an expansive report on Thursday, titled "The racist legacy many birds carry," focused on the "birding community," which apparently is having a difficult debate "about the names of species connected to enslavers, supremacists and grave robbers."  "Corina Newsome is a Black ornithologist, as rare as some of the birds she studies," Post environmental justice reporter Darryl Fears began his piece, noting she was hired to "break down barriers" at the Georgia Audubon nature preserve.

The Editor says...
Lots of places and things are named after badly flawed people.  Get over it.  The people insisting on renaming them all are at least as badly flawed.

Someone Needs to Do a Wellness Check Over at CNN.  You'd think a "news" network that exists to shill and promote the party that gained power in the 2020 election would take a deep breath, but things have only spiraled further for the liberal outlet. [...] CNN and the media at large have reached the point of complete derangement.  They see doom and destruction around every corner, well, unless it's coming from any facet of the left.  In that case, they'll make excuses for torching cities and killing cops.  Regardless, imagine waking up this morning and putting together that homepage and thinking you are emotionally healthy?

How the American Media Perpetuates and Profits from Mass Shootings.  The American media currently has no industry standard practices for how to cover either suicides or mass shootings.  However, one can easily see the difference between how mass shootings and suicides are covered.  Whereas suicides are treated as somber tragedies, mass shootings often have the sensationalism turned up to 11.  There's a detailed discussion of the shooter's life story, motives and methods.  Strong evidence suggests that this both encourages and instructs potential mass shooters.

Oprah's new AppleTV+ show says celebrities aren't like the rest of us.  If you want to know what's going on in the world, don't (really, don't) look at the New York Times or Washington Post.  From them, you get only Democrat partisan spin.  Instead, check out the Daily Mail, an enlivening mix of news and gossip that, despite grammatically awful writing, manages to get a lot of information (and dreck) across.  What it succeeded in doing on Friday was to reveal the mental damage that affects so many of the celebrities who opine about and dangerously affect America's values.  AppleTV+ has released a series of interviews between Oprah and Harry (the prince formerly known as Prince) in which we are given a pathetic insight into the mind of a marginally intelligent, minimally informed man who tragically lost his mother in the most explosive way.  It shouldn't surprise anyone that he has emotional issues or that he married a woman who knows how to manipulate all of them.

If There's Nothing to Hide, Why Are Democrats Freaking Out about the Arizona Audit?  If you have been keeping an eye on the election audit taking place right now in Maricopa County, Arizona, then you also know that Democrats, news propagandists, and "concerned" NeverTrump Republicans are beginning to sound more and more like trapped rats squeaking in fear.  An army of lawyers — many of the same political operatives who manipulated the November election by contravening existing election laws and flooding battleground states with uncontrolled and unverified mail-in ballots — are begging state and federal courts to stop the audit midcourse and petitioning Arizona's Democrat secretary of state and Merrick Garland's Department of Justice to intervene under the absurd pretense that ensuring election integrity somehow deprives voters of their civil rights.  Arizonan and Biden-supporter Cindy McCain has publicly called the vote recount "ludicrous" because "the election is over."  And MSNBC's Rachel Maddow is so terrified of what the auditors might find that she insists that the whole exercise is not only "dangerous," but also the "end of democracy."

Are Covid Fatalities Comparable with the 1918 Spanish Flu?  [Scroll down]  It is common to invoke comparisons with the 1918 Flu Pandemic, as that was an extremely devastating virus that rocked the world.  The article makes multiple references to the 1918 pandemic but there are a couple that raise interesting questions for further investigation.  The first point is as follows, "Combined with deaths in the first few months of this year, Covid-19 has now claimed more than half a million lives in the United States.  The total number of Covid-19 deaths so far is on track to surpass the toll of the 1918 pandemic, which killed an estimated 675,000 nationwide."  Comparing the death counts between the 1918 Flu and Covid-19 without adjusting for population growth is extremely misleading.  In 1918 the population of the United States was roughly 103 million, while near the end of 2020 it stood at roughly 330 million.

The True Lunacy of Reparations.  With race relations apparently having a permanent place in the headlines and radical race activists doing all they can to keep us at each others' throats, we once again have the race-baiters out there calling for — you guessed it, reparations.  And when I say "back in the headlines," I mean that the "racial tensions" are a story because the media have a massive vested interest in keeping them in the headlines.  One of the media's goals is to keep Americans angry and believing that we all hate each other, because the headline "Everyone Is Getting Along Today" doesn't sell newspapers or advertising space and doesn't generate the Almighty Click.

Derek Chauvin — The great white defendant.  Cable channel HLN has covered the trial from gavel to gavel.  When bumping in and out of commercial breaks, HLN displayed a graphic, accompanied by foreboding music, showing two fists tearing an American flag in half, with the caption "America's Very Soul Is on Trial."  Black Lives Matter activist Maya Echols, in a since-deleted TikTok video, said:  "If George Floyd's murderer is not sentenced, just know that all hell is gonna break loose.  Don't be surprised when building are on fire.  Just sayin'."  And Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., says she is "hopeful" of a conviction, but if not, Waters said:  "We've got to stay on the street and we've got to get more active, we've got to get more confrontational.  We've got to make sure that they know we mean business."  No, America's "very soul" is not on trial.

Globalists Will Need Another Crisis In America As Their Reset Agenda Fails.  The mainstream media is pushing a non-stop narrative of covid mutation hype.  We hear about UK and Brazilian variants on a weekly basis, and the assertion has been that surely, these variants will be more infectious and more deadly that the original virus.  There is still no proof whatsoever to confirm this, but the globalists only care about planting the idea in people's heads.  They only care about reigniting the fear.  My feeling is that this strategy is going to fail, at least in the US.  Too many Americans are aware of the con game, and a new virus threat is not going to have the same effect as Covid-19 did in the early months of the pandemic.  None of us really knew what we were facing back then, and caution was a practical response.  Today, we know for a fact that covid is not a concern for the vast majority of the public.  Media attempts to amp up the threat will be ineffective, but they will of course still try.

Coordinated propaganda:
Major News Outlets Pledge to Begin Calling 'Climate Change' a 'Climate Emergency'.  A number of major news organizations worldwide, ranging from Scientific American and The Columbia Journalism Review to The Guardian and Al Jazeera, have signed a pledge to begin referring to "climate change" as a "climate emergency" in their reporting.  "Scientific American has agreed with major news outlets worldwide to start using the term 'climate emergency' in its coverage of climate change," the publication announced Monday in a tweet to its 3.9 million followers touting "the impact we hope it can have throughout the media landscape."  "We Are Living in a Climate Emergency, and We're Going to Say So," the headline of a Scientific American commentary published Monday declares.  Claiming that that climate change is "the biggest environmental emergency to beset the earth in millennia," the piece announces the name change:  "Given the circumstances, Scientific American has agreed with major news outlets worldwide to start using the term 'climate emergency' in its coverage of climate change."

CBS reportedly paid $7M for Prince Harry, Meghan Markle interview.  CBS reportedly paid more than $7 million for the rights to air Oprah Winfrey's highly anticipated tell-all interview with Prince Harry and Duchess of Sussex Meghan Markle.  The two-hour interview, set to air at 8 p.m. Sunday [3/7/2021], cost the network a pretty penny — likely somewhere between $7 million and $9 million, the Wall Street Journal reported.  CBS bought the lucrative rights — the network is charging $325,000 for every 30 seconds of commercial time — from Winfrey's Harpo Productions, and can also license the interview in international markets.  A spokesman for the Sussexes' told the Journal they were not paid for the interview.

Press focuses on Ted Cruz, ignores the building crisis at the border.  The media is intent on reporting on Ted Cruz's one-day trip to Cancun, because it wants to divert attention from Joe Biden's intentional destruction of America.  It is the same reason they lied that Biden was a 'moderate' during the election and why they buried the stories of all the Biden family corruption while they were effectively campaigning and de facto contributing to Biden.  The truth would have destroyed Biden.  The media manipulated and colluded in the election more than Russia or even China has ever done.  Biden is violating his oath of office to uphold immigration laws while flooding Texas and other states with illegals, including many violent criminals, yet Cruz should resign because he left the U.S. for a day?

Fake News Wannabes.  We had a pretty good snowstorm the other day.  I switched on the local news when I got up, naively imagining that they would give me a little useful information in between their usual dire warnings not to leave my home.  For the first time that I can remember they weren't much interested in ice or snow.  They were concerned, instead, that the weather not deter me from going to my local vaccination center.  They wanted to educate me, too, that today was the first day of Black History Month, that blacks die at three times the rate of whites from COVID-19, and that the black vote was suppressed in the recent election.  You remember that election?  The same one that the same station had declared, with smug satisfaction, that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris won easily.  On the following day, a glutton for punishment, I watched these journalistic titans show a teaser for their upcoming investigative report — on the topic of the rise of extremism in America.  I didn't need to actually watch to know that they would not be talking about Antifa or Black Lives Matter.  Their extremists are my friends and neighbors.  The American middle class.  You know — that majority far-right fringe.

How your Washington news gets distorted by media priorities.  You may not see much news coverage on the world's 100,000 airplane flights that land safely every day.  Let one of them crash, however, and you'll see smoldering wreckage and sobbing relatives for 24 hours.  It's the same in news coverage of U.S. politics.  Now for the first time in memory a research team has examined thousands of news interview transcripts and documented what might seem an obvious but very important conclusion:  Extreme views and words by far get the most attention, air time and views online.  People who speak in moderate tones with reasonable views pretty much get ignored or forgotten. [...] The lesson in all this — especially for House members who must campaign every two years — is that being the mouthiest, loudest, most extreme interview and speaker is the way to get noticed by mass media.  And they often stage conflict and confrontations to obtain media attention.

California, land of delusion.  The latest verbal gymnastics our local San Francisco Bay Area, 11 o'clock news team tried and failed to explain was why, when COVID cases are rapidly plummeting, we are not opening the state.  There are only five counties that have "graduated" out of the deadly Purple Tier as of this morning [2/21/2021].  After months of touting the so-called crisis in ICU capacity, now we get no mention of that issue.  Instead, we're treated to ten minutes of proud stories about massive new vaccination sites.  These are immediately followed by stories about the lack of available vaccine doses.  It's almost funny.  We are exhorted to do our duty and get vaccinated, for the common good, if we can find any vaccine.  I know people who desperately wanted it and had to drive for hours to locate doses.  Personally, I wouldn't get the vaccine.  But that's another story.

Expect Overheated Climate Reports Advancing Radical Energy Agendas.  Don't be either surprised or alarmed to see lots of authoritative-sounding "hottest time ever" media reports in advance of President Biden's pledge to recommit America to the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement and support for his all-out war on fossil energy aimed at eliminating carbon emissions from electricity by 2035, and achieving "net-zero carbon emissions" by 2050.  An example appeared in a January 26 Wall Street Journal editorial "World's Ice is Melting Faster than Ever" citing "a new satellite study" which concluded that global melting had dangerously accelerated 65% between 1994 and 2017.  The research was conducted by a team of legitimate scientists from the U.K.'s University of Leeds Centre for Polar Observation and Modeling, the University of Edinburgh, University College London and an Edinburgh-based climate data company called Earth Wave Ltd.  Where the study conclusions go feverishly wrong concerns altogether unsupportable speculations that the melting was "driven by rising atmospheric and ocean temperatures resulting from greenhouse gas emissions."

Something's in a nosedive.  Scary news stories are the norm in the Age of COVID.  Earlier this month, on January 2, 2021, The Hill reported that experts at the University of Washington's Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) predicted 150,000 deaths by the beginning of February.  Just one problem:  Recent data suggest that the worst of the pandemic is over.  In the interest of unity, let's analyze the COVID data on daily new cases and deaths from the New York Times — in particular, the seven-day moving averages.  Using a moving average is important since there are obvious reporting problems from the relevant state agencies.  The raw daily data have a suspiciously consistent saw-tooth pattern.  There is an unrealistic drop on weekends and holidays and a corresponding explosion during mid-week.  Using the seven-day moving average effectively eliminates the reporting problems by incorporating data over the prior week.  Looking at the curves for new cases and deaths, the NYT data show something perplexing.  As seen in the graphs, the curves are going the wrong way for nightmare scenarios.  According to the NYT data, the IHME's January model's prediction of 150,000 deaths is a fantasy.

First Duty of the Press:  Make It About Race.  Even after a mob of Trump supporters stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, the media felt the need to pile up the false accusations.  Their first order of business was to turn it into a story about race.  The Trump riot has as little to do with race as any story in 21st-century America.  COVID, immigration, tax cuts, the stimulus — I could come up with a racial angle for any of those.  Your assignment:  Make the siege at the Capitol a story primarily about race relations.  You, a normal person, one week later: I'm stumped.  But to our media, the main point to be made about the riot was:  Can you imagine what would have happened if black people had done that?

NBC nonsense
Imagine being this detached from reality.  This installment of unhinged hysterics comes to us from NBC News.  ["]WASHINGTON — After last week's deadly assault on the U.S. Capitol by supporters of President Donald Trump, members of Congress are expressing something once unthinkable:  that some of their own colleagues may be endangering their lives.  Not in a rhetorical sense, but in a direct and immediate way.["]  Yes, some Democrats in congress are genuinely worried that their conservative colleagues are going to actually murder them.


Do Not Believe These People.  Maybe I'm just cynical, which I know I am, but every single time one of those teleprompter-reading TV personalities masquerading as journalists use a phrase like "It's a sad day" or "It's impacted all of us," I want to throw up.  There has never been a phonier, less trustworthy group of people with more influence in history.  When idiots stormed the Capitol building, the pearl clutchers went into overdrive with the "this is horrible to see" and some "this is a tragedy" talk.  Yes, both are true, but does anyone believe they actually feel any of it personally?  Why would anyone care about a country when they hold half its citizens in contempt?

News readers consider themselves heroes, until the moment they consider themselves victims.
Jim Acosta goes after Trump supporters: 'A number of us received death threats... we feel endangered'.  CNN's prima donna White House correspondent Jim Acosta became a household name not for his reporting, but for his politically-motivated clashes with President Donald Trump.  Acosta has also targeted the president's supporters, only to then complain that he was receiving death threats, which helped ensure that he remained the center of attention.

The worst-case scenario is the only one that sells newspapers, books, or cable news.
MSNBC Doom and Gloom Doc:  Don't Get Overly Optimistic About the Covid-19 Vaccine, We're in For a "Decades-Long Battle".  MSNBC rolled out a doom and gloom doc Thursday morning [12/24/2020] who warned Americans not to get overly optimistic about a Covid vaccine because we are in for a "decades-long battle."  Dr. William Haseltine promoted his books on Covid as he fear-mongered.  Dr. Haseltine doesn't want Americans to forget about Covid and go on with their lives because he has books to sell.

How dumb would you have to be, to believe this?  So dumb that you'd intentionally watch CNN?
CNN's Sciutto:  Trump Not Conceding Could Put America in 'Potential Danger' for Another 9/11.  CNN anchor Jim Sciutto said Wednesday on CNN's "Newsroom" that President Donald Trump's refusal to concede the 2020 presidential election could put America at risk for a terrorist attack like the 9/11 attacks.  Co-anchor Poppy Harlow asked, "Yes or no, are the actions of the president is taking now putting this country in danger?"  Former Bush administration assistant Attorney General Jack Goldsmith said, "Clearly, it's not great for our democracy."  Sciutto said, "Yep, that's it fair.  Let's put some teeth on that if we can for a moment because they are sitting members of Congress who were around in their positions at the time of 9/11, and the 9/11 commission report specifically cited the shortened transition after the 2000 election for having an impact on national security.  I'm quoting here, 'It hampered the new administration in identifying, recruiting, clearing and obtaining Senate confirmation of key appointees.'[...]"

The Editor says...
Whose fault was that?  Who tore all the "W" keys off the White House typewriters in January 2001?  It wasn't a bunch of Republicans!  This whole argument is a red herring anyway, but the Left could at least come up with an honest analogy.

COVID Panic Porn is Meant to Suppress Trump Vote, But It May Do the Opposite.  Right on schedule, the panic pornsters are shrieking in unison that COVID-19 cases in the United States are on the rise.  Virtually overnight, dozens of stories have appeared in the press, on the internet, or broadcast on the nightly news about the renewed danger. [...] Grim-faced broadcasters on CNN and MSNBC might as well be wearing death masks as they solemnly intone the latest numbers of those who test positive.  They even throw in the story of an untimely death or two to add a human interest element to their tale of woe.  Somehow, however, they never find time to mention that mortality rates are way, way down.  It's always how we're all going to die from the China Virus.

'Truth' Over Facts.  In his memoir, Banana Sunday, the late British newspaperman Christopher Munnion described his first encounter with what was then called New Journalism.  This was a style of newswriting that got going in the 1960s and 1970s.  It was more like long-form fiction than conventional reporting. [...] The new style of journalist came to the story with a narrative in mind.  He was a storyteller who would provide the reader with a sense of what it was like to be in the story, at least the story the writer wanted to tell.  As Munnion explained, the journalist showed up with a prepared narrative and then went around looking for people, events, and images to fill in the details.  The facts were mere ornaments to decorate the story, not the point of the story.

Vile Scarborough:  You're 'Un-American' If You Vote for Trump.  While most left-wing journalists try to channel all their anger at President Trump, they will occasionally go straight to the punch and just start attacking people who support him.  On Tuesday morning [10/20/2020], the co-hosts of MSNBC's Morning Joe scolded American voters who dare, for any reason, to vote for Trump.  With Election Day exactly two weeks away, and millions of Americans already voting, co-hosts Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski decided it was time to launch a brutal verbal assault against Trump supporters.  Apparently triggered by Trump speaking publicly about the Biden family's alleged corruption on Monday, Scarborough whined that it's unacceptable to vote for him for any reason.

QAnon: The Media's Latest Obsession.  Big media has had multiple obsessions during President Trump's first term.  From Stormy and Avenatti to the myriad tell-all books about Trump, his administration, and his family.  From Russia and an innocuous phone call to Ukraine, to his taxes and how many scoops of ice cream he is served.  These are all red herrings, a way to pick at Trump while studiously avoiding serious policy issues, what he is actually accomplishing as president, promises made becoming promises kept.  The latest obsession is QAnon, in the media and recently at the NBC town hall event.  Despite being billed as a question and answer session, it was more of a debate between President Trump and NBC's partisan newsreader Savannah Guthrie.  Of all the issues facing America in 2020 and of concern to voters, QAnon is not on the list.  Yet she laser focused on QAnon starting with[,] "Let me ask you about QAnon" to which Trump responded, "I know nothing about QAnon."  Rather than moving on to the economy or healthcare, she obsessively persisted, insisting that Trump denounce "the fringe conspiracy theory."

The End of Covid Hysteria.  Most of the nation was stunned by the news that Donald and Melania Trump had contracted COVID. [...] The amount of insanity and hysteria poured into Trump's diagnosis by the Democrat/media complex the rest of the weekend was almost funny to watch.  Did his doctor lie?  Did he lie?  What about the 25th Amendment, the procedure of presidential replacement, the coming election, the pending Supreme Court appointment, the number of people surrounding him who were infected?  How dare he take a five-minute ride with Secret Service agents to thank his well wishers!  Non-stop around the clock hysteria.  Almost none of it was helpful, and most of it was true as believing the sky is falling.  Gotta love our responsible, fact-driven media.

Corporate Media Is Vomiting Trump Coronavirus Reporting All Over The Bed.  The latest news cycle over President Trump's COVID-19 diagnosis illustrates yet again how destructive the U.S. corporate media are to national unity and a clear understanding of reality.  While we are all aware that COVID-19 can be a truly devastating and deadly disease for some, despite the volume of media coverage dedicated to it in the past seven months, the American public still lacks crucial context for understanding Trump's diagnosis.  Not only has major media coverage not brought clarity, but it has also, as usual, obscured reality.  This is especially harmful to a story with such significant potential ramifications for the nation and world.  As the president himself has alluded to in his post-diagnosis social media posts, it's common knowledge that the Wuhan virus hits the elderly especially hard.  Trump is 74.  Yet even among his age demographic, surviving the disease, not death, is by far the norm.

Here Were CNN's WORST Moments Immediately After Trump's COVID Diagnosis.  Throughout Friday's early hours, CNNers repeatedly expressed best wishes to President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump after having tested positive for the coronavirus.  But behind those best wishes, CNN not only levied their usual, poisonous rhetoric, but plenty of subliminal levels of apocalyptic brainstorming, gloating, and calls for a return to global lockdowns.  Perhaps worst of all, it led off CNN analyst and former Obama flack Sam Vinograd claiming the President's diagnosis could "be the most dangerous moment that the U.S. government has ever faced."  No word on why the Civil War, Cuban Missile Crisis, four presidential assassinations, September 11, 2001, or two World Wars tested America and her government less.

Please spare me the maudlin rhetoric about Ginsburg's 'tragic' death.  The insufferable Chris Wallace of Fox News kept referring to the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg as "tragic" on yesterday's [9/20/2020] edition of Fox News Sunday.  While I am full of sympathy for her family, loved ones, and friends who all have lost someone they deeply mourn, I cannot see how her death is "tragic" — unless one is a partisan Democrat fearing loss of control of the Supreme Court.  Justice Ginsburg lived to a ripe old age and remained active until almost the very end of her life.  As even President Trump stated, she lived an "amazing life" and lived it to the full until the end.  We all are mortal!  Dying itself, while sad for those left behind, is not a tragedy.

What Has 2020 Taught Us?  [Scroll down]  Then the riots started.  Then the fires, the hurricanes, the election.  I do hope that with all this practice we've learned courage, and that we've learned we must depend on God and His infinite mercy.  We cannot fight this on our own.  We also should have developed an antipathy towards the media.  They have been culpable in spreading and stoking these fears.  They have twisted statistics, adulterated the language, slung clueless accusations, and propped up asinine excuses for the violence.

Eyes Are Rolling After 'Journalist' Jon Karl Equates Covering Trump Rallies to Taking Family Trip to Fallujah.  Every once in a while, the masks completely slip off and supposedly objective journalists accidentally reveal in no uncertain terms what their political colors to their readers and viewers.  Such was the case earlier this week when former White House Correspondents' Association president and ABC News White House correspondent Jon Karl talked to National Journal, which did a story on how "the White House press corps finally drew the line" Sunday on covering President Trump's indoor campaign rallies, which they apparently find hazardous to their health in the age of the Wuhan coronavirus.

The Editor says...
The left-wing news media wants everyone in America to live in constant fear of the coronavirus (and the rioters, and the Russians, and 5G telephone service, and earthquakes, and hurricanes).  They want Americans to believe that it's dangerous to walk into a crowd without a face mask.  I'm not buying it.  It wasn't unsafe a year ago, and it's not unsafe today.  From where I'm sitting, it appears that the coronavirus crisis, if there really was one, is over now.  As soon as the presidential election is over, the news media will forget all about it, because America can go back to (the old) normal at any moment — just as soon as somebody sends out the "all clear" decree.

The Truth About Slavery.  We are continually misled by progressive propaganda on the issue of race.  Misinformation bleeds over to the conservative realm as well.  The media, Hollywood, and academia are consumed with race, tribalism, and hatred for our Founding.  The real agenda here is power, divide and conquer to pursue some ill-conceived Utopia.  The truth is that violence is part of the Left's playbook.  They are opportunists and provocateurs ready for any excuse to attack our freedom.  Much of the violence we see is a planned political strategy taking advantage of the crisis du jour.  Racism is not our Achilles Heel.  It is the ubiquitous manipulation and exploitation of race and racism that threatens our way of life.  Political operatives masquerading as journalists feed the hate 24/7.

The Black New Deal: 1) Abolish Welfare 2) Incentivize The Nuclear Family.  [Scroll down]  The time for black complaints is over.  Slavery happened in America like it has happened in every culture around the world since the beginning of time.  Slavery has been prohibited in the West, and apart from communist China and parts of Egypt, most of the East.  Moreover, as recent studies have shown, racial police brutality has declined to the point of statistical insignificance.  The raison d'etre for the Black Lives Matter organization is a rounding error.  Recent spikes in crime aside, broadly speaking, America has never been safer.  So why does everything feel worse?  For one, media and technology.  Mainstream media, citizen journalism, and nonstop social media all contribute to the sense that our racial divide is at the root of all evil.

MSNBC's Biden Backers Demand Voters End Trump's 'Reign of Terror'.  On Sunday afternoon's MSNBC Live with Alex Witt, during a discussion of President Donald Trump's use of federal agents to counteract rioters in Portland and how it might impact this year's presidential election, MSNBC contributor and liberal historian Jon Meacham conflated segregationist Democrat George Wallace with non-segregationist Republican conservatives like Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan and Barry Goldwater.  After Meacham encouraged viewers to vote against President Trump's "reign of terror" in November, MSNBC Republican Michael Steele agreed with him and encouraged Democrats to turn out to vote against the President.

The Left is signing up citizens to physically remove President Trump from office if he loses.  The left continued to spread the narrative that President Donald Trump may refuse to leave the White House if he loses the election in November.  And left-wing political commentator and Young Turks host Cenk Uygur added to the conspiracy theories on Tuesday [7/21/2020] as he, too, offered a way to rid the country of the president in case the United States military "does not remove him from office" after a supposed loss in November.

Media Malpractice on COVID Numbers.  COVID-19 data are and have been all over the map since this entire mess gained steam earlier this year.  It has gotten to the point that any "numbers" presented as news are suspect at best and fraudulent at worst.  Is this media incompetence or malpractice?  Ignorant or deliberate?  Fox News ran a constant side bar in the early days of the pandemic, with U.S. death counts, much in the way cable news business shows run a ticker of the Dow or S&P 500.  How morbid, but it provided fodder for media talking heads to run around like Kevin McCallister in Home Alone, waving their arms and screaming in panic.  Now that death counts are dropping to the point that they blend in with normal birth and death statistics, the media have predictably pivoted to case counts as their new hair-on-fire statistic to stoke fear, keep the economy shut down, and hopefully banish their nemesis back to the land of Mordor, also known as Mar-a-Lago.

The Press Is Already Trying To Whip Up A New Pandemic Panic.  Oh, no!  With the planet still unlocking and some parts still tightly buttoned down, and with the world economy plummeting, "China Researchers Discover New Swine Flu with 'Pandemic Potential,'" blares CNN.  "Scientists Say New Strain of Swine Flu Virus Is Spreading to Humans in China," shrieks the New York Times.  Say it ain't so!  Okay, it ain't so.  Not in any meaningful way.  The media should go back to "murder hornets," or find another asteroid with a chance in a zillion of hitting Earth.

Not dying is bad for headlines.  As the bumpy COVID-19 path back to normalcy bounces along, you would never know that we were headed in the right direction.  Teasers on television and headlines in newspapers report a "surge" in new cases of COVID-19 and hospitalizations.  The teasers and headlines fail to mention that the most important measure of our progress in getting ahead of the virus is the number of deaths recorded.  The fact that the rate of fatalities to infection is very low now is seldom if ever mentioned. [...] The CDC data show that as of July 1, 2020, death in people younger than 25 is less than 170 out of a total of 120,000.  It is almost non-pronounceable to state a fatality rate — too many zeros after the decimal point.  My point is this:  if you are young and healthy, you have nothing to fear from the coronavirus except the fear-mongering from the media.

The Huge Law Enforcement Scandal that Cries Out for Justice.  In the American Thinker (June 30), Jack Cashill offers an eloquent plea for an Atticus Finch to take up the cause of George Zimmerman in suing those responsible for perpetrating the Trayvon Hoax.  There is another case, also in Florida, awaiting its Atticus Finch, the product of an earlier moral panic, the now largely forgotten "mass sex abuse in daycare" hysteria.  These cases, replete with lurid charges the media mindlessly and breathlessly disseminated in the 1980s and '90s, are today widely recognized as a modern version of the Salem witch trials of the 1690s, down to allegations of Satanic rituals by caregivers.  Despite this, one victim remains incarcerated.  Frank Fuster has now served thirty-five years in prison for a crime not only that he did not commit, but that never happened.  His first parole hearing is scheduled an unbelievable 114 years from now — in March 2134.

Media Begging for a 'Second Wave'.  The media is churning out countless alarmist stories each day about the threat of COVID-19 and the dangers of societal reopening.  "Risk of new lockdown rises with fear of second COVID-19 wave," writes Reuters, as one example of the genre.  These stories generally incite, rather than inform.  They cherry-pick facts and lack context.  Only when the COVID picture is viewed in perspective are people able to make wise decisions about their actions.  It should be safe for society to continue broadly reopening while directing resources to specific at-risk populations, such as nursing homes and prisons, which are more vulnerable.

Don't fear a coronavirus spike.  Mainstream media are sounding the alarm about coronavirus cases spiking across the South and West.  They're distorting the facts to cause panic, instead of reporting the whole truth.  Gov. Cuomo is piling on, accusing states that have reopened of playing politics instead of acting "intelligently." Sorry, but "intelligent" isn't the word that describes his administration's pandemic response.  He caused carnage by forcing nursing homes to take in infected patients.  He also has no good answer for why New Yorkers unfortunate enough to catch the virus had a worse chance of surviving it than people in other states.  The Empire State ranks 48 out of 50 states for survival rates.  Dodging accountability for these [...] facts, Cuomo is bragging about his results and bashing President Trump for encouraging states to reopen.  Cuomo is flat wrong:  The US daily death count from the virus is down nearly 80 percent from its peak in March.  It's telling that the likes of Cuomo and his media allies don't focus on death and hospitalization rates anymore, but almost exclusively on infection rates, to build their doom-and-gloom scenarios.

Brad Parscale:  Campaign Was Not Duped, Media Scared Supporters from Tulsa Rally.  Trump 2020 Campaign Manager Brad Parscale on Sunday [6/21/2020] berated the media for savaging the campaign's small crowd size in Tulsa on Saturday, despite boasting a million campaign ticket requests beforehand.  "For the media to now celebrate the fear that they helped create is disgusting but typical," Parscale wrote in a lengthy statement to reporters.  "And it makes us wonder why we bother credentialing media for events when they don't do their full jobs as professionals."

Pandemic to Protests:  Coverage Shifted But Outlooks Didn't.  After three months of wall-to-wall television coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic, almost overnight the live infection dashboards and often-uttered phrases like "social distancing" have all but disappeared, replaced with images of a nation in racial turmoil.  How are the major cable news channels covering the protests and what do their different narratives teach us about how the media frames national events?  The data provide some clues.  Since late February, CNN, MSNBC and Fox News have spent at least 15% of their daily airtime on the pandemic, based on data from the Internet Archive's Television News Archive processed by the GDELT Project.  CNN displayed a live dashboard of infection and death counts a total of nine hours a day, seven days a week.  As much as half of all news coverage worldwide mentioned the virus.

How do we explain the many thousands of Americans who believe they are entitled to steal?  Night after night, we have watched thieving thugs break windows of small and large businesses, charge into them, and run out with as much merchandise as they can carry. [...] It is very likely that they are proud of themselves.  The media certainly support them, seem to give them permission.  Why do the media do this, support the rioters?  Ratings, of course.  They love riots, cherish their power to get them going.  They love filming the looting without any police presence to stop it.  Do they care about the lives of the business-owners that are destroyed in the process?  Not one bit.  There is not an anchor or guest "analyst" on CNN or MSNBC who feels an iota of compassion for the victim of the destruction wrought by these riots.  To a person, they lend their on-screen approval to the rioters.

Imagining covid-19 under a normal press.  [The New York] Times embraced abnormalcy in August 2016 when it demanded journalists abandon objectivity when covering Donald John Trump.  The Times demanded that journalists treat every statement by him as a lie that he must somehow prove.  The Times also demanded that journalists no longer seek his side of the story when reporting the news. [...] The Pandemic Panic is on the press, not the president.  The press has politicized the covid-19 response.  A normal press would have been careful and balanced in its reporting.  This press is loony.  At one press briefing four different reporters in four different ways asked the president if calling the Chinese Virus the Chinese Virus was racist.

Showboating With 100,000 Dead.  On May 27, the American coronavirus death toll rose to six figures:  100,000 lives lost.  That's a very sad number, made sadder when we ponder that the virus prevents loved ones from saying goodbye in person and makes any funeral an extremely small event.  America's largest national newspapers have all made dramatic front pages out of the number.  The New York Times came first on Sunday [5/24/2020], filling its entire front page and three more pages with names of the victims.  USA Today followed on Wednesday with an entire front page in black and white and photos of the dead.  The Washington Post waited until we reached the horrible number but still printed some stories on the front page.

Carlson: Liberal Media Are 'Thrilled' with Division, Want People to 'Hate One Another'.  Between Wednesday [5/27/2020] and Thursday nights, Fox News Channel host Tucker Carlson was in rare form when discussing the riots in Minneapolis supposedly in appropriate response to the heinous, police-involved killing of African-American man George Floyd.  Carlson didn't mince words, noting that "news organizations like CNN" want Americans to "hate one another" and wondering if liberals would still support rioting if it involved destruction of their property.  On Wednesday night, he reminded viewers of how "[r]ioting is a form of tyranny" and "oppression," but "CNN welcomes it, however, in fact encourages it" since rioters are instead called "protesters."  Carlson added (as he would on Thursday): "America is a diverse country.  Diverse countries only survive if the groups within them can coexist peacefully and thankfully, almost everybody in America wants to coexist peacefully."  However, he noted that liberal media outlets like CNN don't seem keen on that: "[N]ews organizations like CNN do not want that and that's why every day they work hard to fan racial resentment to make different groups distrust and hate one another."

Trump wins the lockdown wars.  President Trump has won the lockdown wars as coronavirus-related restrictions on businesses are eased across the country, so far with few signs of dire health consequences for the population.  Just weeks ago, the question was whether to reopen, with the first states to press ahead accused of engaging in human sacrifice and killing their residents to appease the "Trump death cult."  New York Times columnist Paul Krugman asked, "How many will die for the Dow?" as recently as Thursday [5/21/2020].  Now, the debate is primarily over how quickly and to what extent reopening should take place, with the stragglers mainly blue states.

CNN Becomes Unhinged Because Trump Decided to Golf... Without a Mask.  CNN has made a name for themselves as one of the most anti-Trump networks out there.  After all, they heavily pushed "Russia!  Russia!  Russia!" When Special Counsel Robert Mueller found no collusion took place between the Trump campaign and Russia, CNN focused their coverage on Ukraine and a supposed quid pro quo.  Then it was impeachment.  Anything that is anti-Trump can be found on CNN.  So it's no surprise that one of their photographers captured pictures of President Trump golfing *GASP* without a mask on Saturday.  Not only was he golfing with a few other people but he was riding in his own golf cart.

Liberal Media Hypocrisy Never Ends.  If you watched CNN or MSNBC you'd probably think you're going to die. [...] Daily, viewers and readers are told they're going to die, that Republicans want them to starve and Democrats are their only hope... and they believe it.  They all believe it.  If it's unproven and scary, there is no shortage of media outlets lining up to spread that story.  Is there a link between coronavirus and Kawasaki disease, and inflammatory illness the strikes children?  Journalists have no idea, but there is no shortage of stories about how there might be.  Words like "tied to," "believed caused," and "possibly linked" are common in headlines trying to scare [...] parents thinking about going outside as their states reopen.  Lacking evidence used to stop a story from being run, now it's the basis for them.

Limbaugh says the media is using their climate change playbook on coronavirus reporting.  Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh compared the coronavirus to climate change and accused federal health officials and the national media of using a global pandemic to scare American citizens.  "It seems like every day we get some new scare tactic from some supposedly credible source," Limbaugh said on his nationally syndicated program Thursday.  "And what generally happens is after some reporting of what everybody would consider good news, in less than a day, a couple of stories come along, maybe three, that try to throw cold water on the good news and make it sound even worse than it was the day before — and that's what this is."

CNN's Brian Stelter Melts Down Over Conservative Media Exposing Russiagate Conspiracies.  Call it a symptom of Trump Derangement Syndrome, CNN's Brian Stelter suffered an on-air meltdown Sunday [5/10/2020] over conservative media paying any attention to arguably the largest spy scandal in American history instead of breathlessly covering ongoing public health pandemic, which, center-right outlets are still doing.

The Editor says...
I think this exposes the real purpose of the coronavirus hysteria:  The media-induced virus panic is deflecting attention away from the Obama spying scandal, just as it comes to light in the middle of an election year.

CNN, MSNBC Suffer EPIC Meltdowns Over 'Nuts,' 'Terrifying' Flynn Decision; 'The Fix Is In!'  In a Thursday afternoon that felt like a trip back to life before the coronavirus pandemic, CNN and MSNBC were not only apoplectic over the Department of Justice dropping its case against retired General Michael Flynn, but despondent over the "demoralizing," "destructive," "nuts," and "terrifying" "injustice" that signaled "the collapse of the Justice Department" and "the rule of law."

The Media Racket And The Coronavirus Numbers Game.  The coronavirus is real, and tens of thousands of people around the world have died from it.  But it is not the pandemic we were told it was going to be.  That's not a complaint.  If anything it's gratitude.  Thank God it hasn't been worse.  Unfortunately, in the build-up to our current reality, the media noticed something — their ratings were up.  Obviously, people were tuning in to find out if they were going to die or not.  Telling them it was highly unlikely that they would only drive them back to their old viewing habits and away from cable news.  Print media found the same thing with their traffic.  This terrified Democrats too, with CNN and MSNBC, along with most newspapers, firmly in their camp and eager to spread fear and blame, something had to be done.  They broke out the boxes — a running total, always on screen, of cases and deaths which, without context, can only scare.  The context is never, ever given.

COVID-19 [is] turning out to be huge hoax perpetrated by media.  A recent Stanford University antibody study estimated the fatality rate from the virus is likely 0.1% to 0.2%.  The World Health Organization (WHO) had estimated that the death rate was 20 to 30 times higher and called for isolation policies.  On which version do you think the media focused? [...] The media has been hyping COVID-19 since Day One, alarming Americans to the point where they voluntarily went along with shutting down the entire economy — a mistake that will likely reverberate for a decade or more.  Even as U.S. states begin to re-open — based on the data, which shows a far lower fatality rate than reported and a much wider spread of the virus — the media continue to report on what they deem frightening numbers over the deadly virus.  They aren't, and it isn't.  COVID-19 is a bad flu at worst.  And the media should be held accountable for telling us otherwise before they knew the facts.

The Most Tragic Case of Governmental, Medical, and Media Malpractice In the History of the World.  [Scroll down]  The little real anecdotal evidence accidentally seeping into mainstream media indicates that the actual fatality rate in our nation from COVID-19 is less than the fear-merchants are displaying on their "Death Dashboards."  Potentially, far less.  Unbiased professional reporting could tell us the real numbers.  But then, that's the rub.  Much of the liberal mainstream media signed up for team "Doom and Gloom" from day one.  At first, they did so to create as much fear and panic as possible so they could use COVID-19 as the mother of all click-bait cash cows.  Once that was accomplished, many in that same liberal media chose to keep the fear-mongering going as a political tool.

A CNN journalist pens a fascinating insight into the left's dystopian worldview.  On April 7, Bill Weir, CNN's Chief Climate Correspondent, had a son.  Weir wrote an open letter to his son telling him that he was born into Hell on Earth, also known as the modern Western world.  The letter perfectly encapsulates everything the left hates and wants to see destroyed. [...] Weir is a tragic figure because he has eyes but cannot see.  The real tragedy, though, is that people like Weir, through the power of the media, drive too much of America's political agenda.

Chris Cuomo's coronavirus performance shows he is an insecure blowhard.  On Monday [4/20/2020], CNN posted video of pseudo-newsman Chris Cuomo "finally" emerging from self-quarantine in his Southampton basement — despite Cuomo having been out and about in East Hampton just last week, getting into a fight with a "jackass loser fat-tire biker" who dared to ask why an infected Cuomo was breaking quarantine.  Without a face mask.  "Who [...] are you?" Cuomo replied.  "I can do what I want."  Yes:  If we've learned anything about Chris Cuomo these past three weeks, it's that he's an insecure, self-important, entitled blowhard who suffers in the shadow of his much more accomplished and respected brother, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo.

The Left Is an Existential Threat.  The March 2020 issue of Fortune magazine focused on the "existential threat" to the Earth posed by global warming, despite the fact that no significant global warming seems to be taking place.  With its appealing cover art — an image of the Earth tied up in a plastic trash bag — this issue is just what I'd expect from a liberal outfit.  It's typical of climate alarmists to begin by assuming their premise:  warming is an existential threat because, well, it is.  And anyone who questions that premise is a criminal.  Just what is meant by "existential threat" is a bit vague.

Chuck Todd Is Wrong (Again): There Are Huge Downsides To The Media Being Overly Alarmist.  There are no costs associated with being "overly alarmist" in the face of a global pandemic, "Meet the Press" host Chuck Todd claimed on Sunday.  His comment encapsulates the attitude of the media and other elites as they drive people and state and local governments deeper into a panic that has resulted in the loss of tens of millions of jobs, the likely permanent closures of hundreds of thousands of businesses, a general inability to pay rent and other monthly bills, a lack of treatment for non-coronavirus health problems, the closure of churches and schools, the exacerbation of disparities by socio-economic status in educational attainment, disruptions to the supply chain, and the destruction of trillions of dollars of American wealth. [...] The problem is that the experts who are being listened to so carefully are solely focused on minimizing mal effects from the coronavirus, all other considerations notwithstanding.

President Trump needs to set the country free now.  For weeks now, nearly every media outlet has behaved as though the Covid19 virus was a cause for celebration.  They broadcast the numbers like they show the stock market or election returns.  It is positively ghoulish.  Even Fox News, which used to have more sense, has capitulated to the hysteria; that network, too, is all in on manufacturing panic and fear.  They are engaged in panic-mongering.  They are encouraging the wholesale destruction of the American economy.  The worst are hoping and wishing for that outcome.  That is how much they are willing to sacrifice to see the president defeated.  The American mainstream media is the most dangerous enemy of America.  There can no longer be any doubt about that fact.  For nearly four years, they have worked hand in hand with the Democrat party to do whatever harm it can to this country if it will take Trump down and out.

Does America need Journalists?  Here's a free tip for the media:  If you don't want to be accused of bursting with glee over America's misfortune, it is generally helpful to not cheer America's misery while doing all in your power to amplify and extend it. [...] Here are a few obvious suggestions.  For one, a journalist's reporting on the current crisis would show some sense of proportion and would weigh tradeoffs between protecting America's physical and economic health, since they can't be uncoupled.  In the long run, economic destruction if allowed to proceed unabated will do far more damage than the virus can ever achieve. [...] What we have are the media that cried wolf, completely incapable of informing when an actual crisis shows up since their faux outrage is always cranked to max power, even if indeed they wanted to inform.

Trump's not scaring people about the coronavirus:  The media are.  I understand critical reporting, but if anyone is guilty of scaring the public, it's the national media.  They have reported on this pandemic and the administration's response to it as though it were something out of the Book of Revelations.  Every single death is characterized as an avoidable tragedy — something that we should have been able to stop if not for an inept president.  In fact, the experiences of many countries not led by Trump has been strikingly similar.  The truth is that no one, not the president, not scientists, and certainly not the media, has a firm grasp on what will happen with the coronavirus.  So far, we've identified trends in how it affects people, and we have some projections about how bad things will get, but that's about it.

Trump's Kiplingesque Coronavirus Leadership.  [Scroll down]  The yellow journalism storm hit hurricane strength when Fox's Tucker Carlson told the Trump base that America would end unless the president came forward with a comprehensive national plan.  Even then, President Trump's next proposals were moderate.  They mostly loosened government rules restricting private medical responses and still emphasized federalism and decentralization.  But in the face of the media blizzard and Congress' belief that spending trillions was the only way to "do something," all Washington agreed on the need to throw trillions of their borrowed money at the crisis and exert drastic new controls.  The executive finally accommodated to this panic.  Even then, he expressed hope that extreme controls would last only for a limited time, setting the restrictions for 15 days.

Fear and Panic for A Purpose — The Coronavirus Evolves Into "The Blue Plague".  The "Blue Plague" is an intentional effort by various interests to create fear-porn amid the American population by intentionally hyping a mass hysteria about the coronavirus.  In many ways the Blue Plague is exponentially more dangerous than COVID-19 itself.  Earlier today [3/26/2020], The New York Times became the epicenter of the Blue Plague by stating people in hospitals throughout the city were dying, as desperately under-prepared and under-equipped doctors and nurses could not find ventilators for thousands of arriving patients in a state of panic.  This was/is incitement at its worst.

Explosion of leftist hate aimed at Dr Birx after she demolishes media's panic narrative.  Dr. Deborah L. Birx, the response coordinator for the White House Coronavirus Task Force, has proven to be a voice of reason in a time of crisis — much to the angst of the hostile, anti-Trump media.  The hair-on-fire media is pushing a panic-inducing worst-case narrative in the face of the COVID-19 outbreak, focusing on predictions of alarming increases in those who contract the Chinese virus while reporting on dwindling hospital supplies and do-not-resuscitate orders allegedly being discussed to free up more beds.  Yet, Birx stands calmly before the American people at the nightly press briefings and reminds agenda-driven journalists of a little thing called facts, beseeching them to be more responsible in their reporting.  "There is no situation in the United States right now that warrants that kind of discussion," she implored.

We Should Start Mocking The Media More; Two Suggestions They'd Hate.  The corporate political news media in America is an absolute disgrace that deserves something far less respectful than criticism.  They deserve mockery.  If you're paying attention and I don't blame you one bit if you're not, then you know that our nation just watched the corporate media in America 1) create a national panic meant to inflict economic and social destruction that they could weaponize and use against President Trump, and 2) further bolster that attempted domestic terrorism by siding with the Chinese Communist Party's every lie and attack on our nation and the Trump administration.  As if the last four years of being useful idiots for Russia and doing everything they can to stoke division, distrust and discord in America weren't bad enough — the corporate media in America, aka the swamp's marketing arm, are now actively trying to create economic and social carnage in America while literally cheering on the Chinese Communist Party's attacks on our President and nation.

The Manchurian Media.  Last Thursday [3/12/2020], the Media Research Center assembled a video clip of the media melting down over Republicans correctly noting the origin region of the coronavirus, screaming that it's rrrraaaaaccccccism and/or xenophobia to refer to it as either "the Chinese Coronavirus" or "the Wuhan Virus" — along with 35 times the media referred to the virus as "the Chinese Coronavirus" or "the Wuhan Virus." [...] I'm pretty sure that John Frankenheimer didn't intend for The Manchurian Candidate to be a how-to guide.  But if the media were paid Chinese agents, could they do more to harm this country than they're already doing now?

A little perspective helps.  What's worse?  The rapid spread of a novel virus which originated in China or the media hysteria created and broadcast around the world?  If it was the intent of the American media to create a state of fear and panic, they've succeeded brilliantly.  The dissemination of information pertinent to the virus has morphed into a murky river of rumors, innuendo, outright lies and blather proffered by pundits who are neither doctors nor experts on much of anything other than opinionating.

If It Bleeds, It Leads:  The Morbidity Of The News.  New York Magazine ran an article in 1989 titled "Grins, Gore, and Videotape — The Trouble with Local TV News" by journalist Eric Pooley.  Pooley was angry about the quality of the stories being published locally and the sheer volume of stories whose subject matter was grim and menacing.  Pooley said, "The thoughtful report is buried because sensational stories must launch the broadcast:  If it bleeds, it leads." The media in and of itself is a physical manifestation of our primal desires and fears, and they take great joy in using it for their own political purposes.  Most likely, the populace is the very cause of the demand.  Ever notice the number of rubbernecking motorists who slowdown in order to see something on the other side of a road or highway, often the scene of a traffic accident.  It's the same thing with this Covid-19 outbreak.  If it bleeds, it leads, and they are doing their best to panic America.

Here's Why the Deep State and Wuhan Virus Are Like White on Rice.  The Democrat-media complex and their Deep States allies have elevated the Wuhan virus crisis to virtually a mass hysteria over the past couple of weeks.  Their goal is transparent, of course:  to instill fear, to tank the economy, and to ascribe blame for everything on President Trump as a means of setting the table to take him out in the November election since their impeachment farce (and other gambits) have failed to get the job done beforehand. [...] This is precisely the reason why the Democrats and their lickspittle media are weaponizing the Wuhan virus crisis.  It is yet another overt attempt on their part to take out the president.  Compare their hysterical actions over the past few weeks to the virtual silence during the 2009 H1N1 swine flu epidemic.  Obama didn't even declare a national emergency until over 1,000 Americans had died of the disease, yet President Trump has been repeatedly castigated for his supposedly "chaotic response" to the Wuhan virus.

'Trump's Chernobyl': Media Wuhan Virus Hysteria Stokes Public Panic.  Since the coronavirus came on the horizon, media figures have been stoking panic, leading to mass shortages of basic health supplies, business travel cancellations, and market drops, all while the confirmed disease number hiked yesterday [3/10/2020] to around 0.000002 percent of the U.S. population.  So far, U.S. cases of the basic seasonal flu outnumber coronavirus cases by a factor of 45,000 (using federal stats for this year's flu and real-time tracking of coronavirus confirmations).  The flu season has even been especially bad this year, with between 20,000 and 52,000 deaths, compared to 29 so far from coronavirus.  According to infectious disease expert Dr. Paul Carson, who works for the North Dakota public health department, the flu appears to be about five times more contagious than coronavirus, which means containment is possible, although especially for the elderly coronavirus appears to have higher death rates.

Dr. Drew Pinsky slams media for inciting coronavirus 'panic'.  Celebrity physician Dr. Drew Pinsky said the media is stoking the flames of coronavirus "panic" in the United States, and the industry should "be held accountable."  "What I have a problem with is the panic and the fact that businesses are getting destroyed, that people's lives are being upended, not by the virus, but by the panic," Pinsky said in an interview with CBS last week.  "The panic must stop.  And the press, they really somehow need to be held accountable because they are hurting people."

Coronavirus By The Numbers.  Big media is all about ratings, view, and clicks, hence their axiom, "If it bleeds, it leads." A viral outbreak is the perfect story, on par with a missing Malaysian airliner or a celebrity football player named OJ on trial for murder.  The added bonus is that any negative news can be laid at the feet of a president loathed by the media, who just so happens to be running for reelection.  The media is in full campaign mode, trying desperately to drag the carcass of one of their corpselike candidates across the presidential finish line.  Stoking fear over quarantines and supply chain disruptions have sent the stock market on a downward roller coaster ride.  One of President Trump's major achievements is the roaring economy.  Taking the stock market down 25% or more may help the Democrats. [...] Look also at past viral illnesses, far more lethal than coronavirus.  The fatality rate for MERS and SARS was 34.4 and 9.5% respectively.  Neither illness generated as much media hysteria as coronavirus.

Can the Coronavirus-Panic-Creating Media be Sued for Closed Businesses and Lost Jobs?  The deliberate panic created over the coronavirus is not victimless.  Far from it.  When the radioactive dust settles from this orchestrated panic-strategy, potentially hundreds of billions will have been lost, thousands of businesses closed, and millions of employees fired.  When the coronavirus first reared its ugly head, many in the media instantly saw it as a cheap and easy way to increase clicks, newspaper sales, viewers, listeners, and most especially Ad revenue.  In the guise of "informing the public," they intended to run scare headlines and stories to spike attention to their sites.

Latest Climate Report Feeds into Alarmist Fearmongering.  The latest National Climate Assessment, released just last week, aims to plant yet another seed of climate catastrophism into the mind of the public.  Predictably, its worst-case scenarios got huge play in the media.  After all, disaster sells.  But the doomsday scenarios that animated talking heads throughout the weekend aren't just highly unlikely; they're close to impossible.

The Coronavirus Numbers Are Not Quite What They Seem.  Dr. Anthony Fauci, the articulate, veteran director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, described at the presser how the efforts to prevent the spread — or "contain" the virus — would continue, but warned that we should expect the number of coronavirus cases in the United States to increase.  Fauci emphasized that the chance of becoming infected remains low and that the majority of those who contract the virus — 75 to 80 percent — will experience it like a "bad flu or a cold."  The other 15 to 20 percent, he said, may need "advanced medical care."  "For the most part, the people who get in trouble and ultimately tragically would die from this are people who are elderly and or have underlying conditions ... heart disease, chronic lung disease, diabetes, obesity," Fauci said.  Some of the "if it bleeds, it leads" media immediately jumped on the 15 to 20 percent figure, multiplied it by the entire U.S. population of about 330 million, and concluded that we might need 50-60 million hospital beds, for which we are unprepared.

Think Trump is 'outrageous?' He's nothing compared to these past presidents.  Unprecedented, unprecedented.  Everything is unprecedented.  Nothing like this has ever happened before.  Except it pretty much has.  Whenever you see the word "unprecedented" in the media, you should ask yourself:  Has this reporter ever read a history book?  Make the case against Trump if you want to, but if you pretend the sorts of things he does are without precedent, you simply make yourself look ignorant.

How Dumb Are America's College Students?  It is an article of faith on the Left that college girls are raped at a rate orders of magnitude above the national average.  If that were true, not only would law enforcement be devoting much of its resources to the college rape epidemic, but 18 year old girls and their parents would avoid our universities and colleges like the plague.  But, of course, that isn't happening.  The whole thing is nonsense.

Media Spread Gossipy Barr Resignation Rumor.  "Sources" tell ABC News that "Attorney General Bill Barr told people close to Trump Tuesday that he is considering resigning over the tweets."  Right.  Do any of these corporate media outlets have any credibility?  No, but it keeps the news cycle saturated with hysteria and occasions them a freak out on their political snuff shows and Twitter.  "News" of the Barr resignation was first reported by one the largest purveyors of fake news and gossip:  The Washington Post.  Shortly after the resignation rumor was reported the DoJ shot it down.  "Addressing Beltway rumors:  The Attorney General has no plans to resign," DOJ spokeswoman Kerri Kupec tweeted.  It would be absolutely tragic if Barr were to leave because Trump would never, ever be able to get a good replacement.

Really Bad Things the Media Is Ignoring Because of Impeachment.  Have you heard that the president has been impeached?  Seriously, the trial is happening right now in the U.S. Senate.  I'm kidding.  Of course, you can't escape the news because it's the only thing the "news" is talking about.  We're in the middle of the most choreographed foregone conclusion in history and the media is treating it like a whodunit.

Nets Hype Alleged Trump Audio Only ABC Has Heard, Refuses to Air.  Without providing any evidence, ABC News made headlines on Friday when they claimed they had heard an audio recording of President Trump ordering the former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine to be fired, something that would supposedly aid Democrats with impeachment.  Both CBS News and NBC News pounced on the reporting during their evening newscasts despite the fact ABC had not released the audio or commented on its authenticity.  For something that was supposedly a bombshell uncovered by his own network, World News Tonight anchor David Muir sure kept his distance when he kicked off the program with the report.

Don't buy the media hype over the new China virus.  A CNN reporter broadcasts from Wuhan, China, on the recent viral outbreak.  There is nobody near who could possibly infect him — unless the cameraman has Guinness Book of Records coughs and sneezes.  So why does he insist on wearing a blue surgical mask while talking?  It's called "drama," which is badly needed, because there appears to be nothing very special about this outbreak of the 2019-nCoV or Wuhan virus.  It should actually be called the DvV, or Déjà vu Virus, because we have been through these hysterias before.  Over and over.  Heterosexual AIDS, Ebola repeatedly, the H1N1 swine flu that was actually vastly milder than the regular flu and, especially, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) in 2003.  Once you start debunking mass hysteria over outbreaks, it gets easy, because the same patterns repeat themselves.

Another dud in the string of bombshells.  [Scroll down]  If it takes exhaustive and complicated explanations to pinpoint precisely why something is a "bombshell," then it is not a "bombshell."  That is the point of a "bombshell."  It is so powerful that it does not need to come wrapped in complicated explanations.  But there is no rabbit hole these people will not venture down in pursuit of President Trump.  There is no zany conspiracy theory they will not gulp down to keep the party going.  And there is no arcane strip of federal code from centuries gone by that they won't dust off to construct their rickety case for impeachment.

Greg Gutfeld Loses It Over the Pomp and Circumstance of Impeachment.  [Scroll down]  ["]We know this was an emotional tantrum directed at daddy who won the election, and they're mad at daddy.  So we have to go through this phony procession.  Ooh, let's show pictures of the cloak room!  Ooh, let's watch them walk down the halls!  Ooh, this is breaking news!["]

The Fantasy War That Never Was.  Over the past few weeks, the media have been singing in 100-part harmony that America is headed to war.  From Fox News and CNN, to MSNBC and the New York Times, media magpies have been proclaiming that America is going to war with Iran, thanks to the rube-in-chief who has no idea what he is doing.  The New York Times declares the U.S. and Iran are, "At the edge of war."  The Wall Street Journal at least asks, "Will the U.S. and Iran blunder into war?" [...] We have been at war with Iran for 40 years, since the Georgia peanut farmer thought the semi-thuggish Shah of Iran was a bad guy, and a religious fanatic would be a better choice to lead the country.

CNN focuses on Trump's twitter typos
CNN's Brian Stelter Does Deep-Dive Data Analysis on Trump's Twitter Typos.  CNN's Brian Stelter used up three-and-a-half minutes of his basement-rated Sunday show to blow the lid off of President Trump's Twitter typos.  Well, two things we can all spell is "3.6 percent unemployment" and "a 40 percent decline in viewers."


When did routine bad weather become such big news?  Bad weather on Thanksgiving week can be stressful in the best of circumstances.  But this week's outbreak of TV weather hysteria was a sight to behold.  For days on end, even Trump news was booted from the top of the network evening newscasts by dire warnings of the "triple storm danger" heading across the country and the "holiday travel nightmare" likely to result.  The reports hit all the usual TV-weather bases: shots of skidding cars and chugging snowplows; airport scenes of passengers stranded by flight delays; Al Roker bounding among the weather maps as though he were plotting a military operation.  And, as always, the alarming statistics: 21 million people under winter-weather alerts; 97 million vulnerable to high winds; "2,000 miles' worth of winter-storm watches, advisories and warnings," stretching from California to the upper Midwest.

The Editor says...
On the other hand, very cold weather at Thanksgiving, including snow in southern California, is newsworthy because it's a little early in the year for all this snow.  What happened to "global warming?"

Everything You Hear About Billion-Dollar Disasters Is Wrong.  The U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) counts the number of disasters in the United States that result in losses of greater than $1 billion, starting in 1980.  Over the past three decades that count has shown a sharp increase, from five or less such disasters each year in the decade of the 1980s to ten or more in each of the past 4 years.  That increase must be due to climate change, right?  Actually, no.  The billion-dollar disaster tally is easy to understand, simple to communicate, but — regrettably — incredibly misleading and just plain bad economics.

CBS Anchor Advertises Televised Impeachment Hearings Like Fight Entertainment.  By her excitement and choice of words, one could easily think failing CBS Evening News anchor Norah O'Donnell was promoting a pay-per-view boxing or pro-wrestling match during Wednesday's [11/6/2019] newscast.  But no, she was hyping the televised impeachment hearings that would start next week.  In addition to that, NBC Nightly News chided Republicans were wanted the public to know the identity of the infamous anti-Trump whistleblower who helped to start the investigation.  "Tonight, lights, cameras, testimony.  The stage is set for the first televised hearings of the impeachment inquiry," O'Donnell excitedly proclaimed during the program's opening tease.  "We now know when they will happen and who may be the Democrats' star witness."  Once they were finished with the teases, O'Donnell could barely contain her glee as she sprinted to call them "historic," adding, "televised impeachment hearings begin a week from today, and it promises to be must-see TV." [...] She was acting more like a fight promoter for a UFC match than a journalist.  S

Democrats may come to regret choosing impeachment over independents.  Ukraine.  Doral.  Impeachment.  Syria.  Schiff and Pelosi.  Hunter and Joe.  Trump and Trump.  Impeachment.  Secret hearings and secret Russian "assets."  Impeachment.  The media can't get enough of it.  Most people have had enough already.

Local California CBS reporter fired after jumping on, damaging cars during live news segment.  A local CBS reporter in California was apparently fired after he — during a live news segment — climbed atop classic, privately-owned cars, even seemingly damaging one of them in the process.  Angel Cardenas, a correspondent with KMAX-TV's "Good Morning Sacramento," was on air Sunday at the Sacramento International Auto Show, a weekend-long event at Cal Expo that was about to begin its final day.  Someone who caught the segment on air, Adam Copeland, posted a clip of it to Facebook, as he has "never seen such a disregard to someone else's vehicle."

The Editor says...
I've seen several so-called reporters over the years who played the role of out-of-control daredevil/buffoon on the Big Morning Show.  This is the reporter who is the first to ride a new roller coaster at Six Flags, or the one who goes bungee jumping on live TV, or goes rappelling down the side of a building.  (In larger TV markets, the Happy Team of Steve Serious and Suzie Plastique "anchor" the Big Morning Show, but after the first ten minutes, they've run out of news.  At that point they may have to resort to pie-in-the-face slapstick to retain viewers.)  At times, you may hear Steve and Suzie, back in the studio, gasp in phony astonishment at the risks being taken out in the field.  And then, after no more than three minutes, the buffoon in the field will wrap it up.  This is all done for the purpose of grabbing the audience's attention through whatever means necessary, much like a two-year-old screaming in a restaurant.  In this case, the buffoon/jackass thought he could get away with anything, and found out otherwise.

How the American Media Perpetuates and Profits from Mass Shootings.  The American media currently has no industry standard practices for how to cover either suicides or mass shootings.  However, one can easily see the difference between how mass shootings and suicides are covered.  Whereas suicides are treated as sombre tragedies, mass shootings often have the sensationalism turned up to 11.  There's a detailed discussion of the shooter's life story, motives and methods.  Strong evidence suggests that this both encourages and instructs potential mass shooters.  Statistically speaking, mass shootings represent a tiny portion of all deaths in the United States. [...] Despite the low frequency of these tragedies, the media pays outsized attention to them for self-serving reasons, which are both political and economic:  There's a demonstrated anti-gun agenda amongst America's media.  And there's the ongoing shift in the media's business model to attention-based revenue that results in ever-more sensational news coverage and "clickbait" headlines.

Anti-Trump Psychodrama 10.0?  What do the Kavanaugh hearings, Jussie Smollett, the Covington kids, the Mueller investigation, and now the Trump phone call all have in common?  Staged melodrama, media collusion hysteria, progressive demands that justice be served immediately, promises of walls-are-closing-in blockbuster revelations from new witnesses, supposed surprise revelatory documents, fusions between Democratic politicians and Washington bureaucrats — and then bust, nada, and teeth-gnashing as the truth catches up to various rumor-mongers.

Disappointing State Department IG Meeting Deflates U.S. Media.  For two days the mainstream media were breathlessly reporting on an "urgent request" from the State Department Inspector General for a closed-door meeting.  Media sources whipped their left-wing audiences into an anticipatory frenzy with predictions of devastating information soon to come from an "explosive" and "highly unusual" request.  It must must be connected to President Trump and Secretary Mike Pompeo hiding devastating information, they said...  Well, the super-anticipated 'closed door' briefing was held today, and the IG handed out packets of information related to revelations of Democrats colluding with the Ukraine government.  The exact opposite of what the media and the professional left anticipated.

They Demand Our Respect, Yet Treat Us Like Fools.  Six months ago I wrote about the liberal media masquerading as journalists to scam the American people down a rabbit hole with their contrived high noon drama-filled fake news scandals. [...] Unfortunately, we are still bored with these manufactured scandals.  These snake-oil salesmen Washington "insiders" have not figured us out yet.  But we've figured them out.  They are desperados who cannot survive without their 'sky is falling' narratives.  As pathetic as these high-brow so-called intellectuals are, they are simply people who stayed in Washington long enough to drink the Potomac Kool-Aid, catch the fever, and delusively believe the universe centers on them — that all of America is riveted to their televisions and newspapers yearning to hear what these chatterboxes have to say.

CNN Counts Down The Number Of House Democrats Who Support Impeaching Trump With 'Impeachment Clock'.  CNN is anticipating impeachment proceedings to begin against President Donald Trump with an "impeachment countdown clock."  The network has a graphic behind the anchors that is adding up the number of House Democrats who support impeachment.

California ramps up efforts to combat invasive swamp rodents.  The swamp rodents, called nutria, are setting off alarms in California.  They weigh about 20 pounds (9 kilograms) each and eat the equivalent of about a fourth of their weight each day by burrowing into riverbanks and chomping into plants that emerge from the water.

The Editor says...
Nothing new here.  They've been around Houston for decades.

Network Morning Shows Hype Trump Impeachment 17 Times [in One Day].  On Monday [9/23/2019], the network morning shows managed to feature some variant of the word "impeachment" a total of 17 times while reporting on President Trump's phone call with the President of Ukraine about corruption allegations against Joe Biden's son Hunter.  In addition, ABC, NBC and CBS eagerly touted a letter from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi accusing Trump of "lawlessness."

White House Press Secretary Says Daily Briefings On Hold Because Grandstanding Reporters Trying To 'Get Famous'.  During [George W. Bush]'s time in office, the White House press secretary held a briefing nearly every day.  Reporters crammed into the smaller-than-it-looks Brady Briefing Room and badgered the secretary with questions, usually for about an hour.  Some in the first row, usually employed by a TV network, would drone on and on, holding court, asking questions that sometime ran for two minutes (air time, don't you know).  And some, like NBC's David Gregory, would ask five, six, seven questions, often as his colleagues behind him moaned.  Barack Obama held fewer daily briefings, and under President Trump, they barely ever happen.

Yellow Journalism to Fake News:  Media lies against Justice Kavanaugh.  [Scroll down]  The stories were frequently alarming, nudging readers toward hysteria and, as the case usually was, largely fiction.  Today its lineage has continued to other gold medal aspirants:  The Washington Post, MSNBC, CNN, and others. [...] But the gold medal remains in the hands of the so-called Gray Lady:  The New York Times.  Frank Luther Mott identifies yellow journalism based on five characteristics:
  •   Scare headlines in huge print, often of minor news
  •   Lavish use of pictures, or imaginary drawings
  •   Use of faked interviews, misleading headlines, pseudoscience, and a parade of false learning from so-called experts
  •   Emphasis on full-color Sunday supplements, usually with comic strips
  •   Dramatic sympathy with the "underdog" against the system.
Yellow journalism has had its day reaching its pinnacle during the early 20th century.

Good News.  I rarely watch cable news anymore.  It's all hysteria, all the time.  CNN: "We are destroying the planet."  MSNBC: "The middle class is disappearing!"  President Donald Trump says drug trafficking "is worse than ever!"  I'm glad my favorite magazine, Reason, cuts through the gloom and tells us the truth:  There is less war and more food.  We live healthier and longer lives. [...] It's a surprising message, since most journalists tell us everything's terrible.

There's A Good Reason People Hate The Media.  On Tuesday morning [9/10/2019], the liberal media was in a tizzy — National Security Advisor John Bolton had been fired or resigned.  It didn't matter which, there was a "shake up" in the Trump administration and these Democrats with press passes were ready to pounce. [...] The American people aren't watching, they aren't interested.  Who cares if Bolton was fired or resigned?  That he's gone now is all that matters, and that only matters to a very few.  The opening left by Bolton will be filled by someone else, and life will continue.  By next week, fewer people will remember this than care about it now.  The Bolton exit is the latest "STOP THE PRESSES" moment from an opposition media desperate to find something, anything with which to damage President Trump.

CNBC's Jim Cramer: 'The Only People Talking About a Recession Are Us'.  Have you noticed all the talk recently by the mainstream media about a recession?  Of course, many members of the MSM can barely contain their glee at the prospect of an economic downturn hurting President Trump's prospects in the election next year.  Well, Jim Cramer on Thursday's [9/5/2019] Squawk Box told host Joe Kernen that the only people talking about such a recession are "us," meaning members of the media.

Media Meltdown over Trump's Hurricane Predictions.  The Trump-hating media has been suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder since November 2016, relapsing into insanity after each Trump tweet.  The latest trigger is Trump's tweet about the potential course of Hurricane Dorian. [...] It's a typical Trump tweet with presidential well wishes ahead of a massive potential hurricane.  It took only one word to send the media into a psychotic state.  That word was Alabama, one of several states that could have been affected by the hurricane.  CNN, blissfully unconcerned that Joe Biden often doesn't know where he is or who he was vice-president for, was outraged that Trump is "spreading false information during an emergency situation".  This is even more of a national crisis to CNN than when they learned that the President gets two scoops of ice cream.

Is It True That 'Getting Killed by Police Is a Leading Cause of Death for Young Black Men,' as the LA Times Claims?  As is the intent, the headline is an attention-grabber. [...] Most readers of course will not delve beyond the headline, but even those who do will not encounter anything resembling journalism as it was once practiced.  Rather, they'll find more than 1,400 words devoted to the racial-grievance agenda that drives so much of what appears in the Los Angeles Times.  And worse, not only is journalism itself perverted with the story, but so is science, for the story is presented as such on the page and was written by Amina Khan, who is billed on the paper's website as a "science writer."  So, if you dare to quibble with any of the story's details, or heaven forbid question its very premise, it makes you a "denier," one to be cast out into the darkness with climate-change skeptics, believers in sex differences, and all the other benighted deplorables who are so sneered upon among our sophisticated betters in the media.

How The Media Enables Destructive Climate Change Hysteria.  At a 2005 London conference of "concerned climate scientists and politicians" that helped launch contemporary climate rhetoric, attendees warned that the world had as little as 10 years before the Earth reached "the point of no return on global warming." Humans, they claimed, would soon be grappling with "widespread agricultural failure," "major droughts," "increased disease," "the death of forests," and the "switching-off of the North Atlantic Gulf Stream," among many other calamities.  Since then, the Earth has gotten greener.  This year, for the first time since we began logging data in 2000, there were no "extreme" or "exceptional" droughts across the contiguous United States — although we've come close to zero on numerous occasions over the past decade.  Every time there's a drought anywhere in the world, climate change will be blamed.  But world crop yields continue to ensure that fewer people are hungry than ever.

NASA map shows Africa has more fires burning than Brazil.  The dust up with France's Macron and the President of Brazil's Jair Bolsonaro regarding the fires burning in the Amazon left out one small detail.  Africa is on fire as well.  NASA maps show that there are more fires in the African region than in the Amazon.  The on again off again acceptance of money to fight the Amazon fire lost sight that we have fires everywhere.  The G-7 Summit raised $20 Million to assist in putting out the fires in Brazil.  No doubt more proof that humans are just too destructive to the "lungs" of earth.  Another detail never mentioned is that long before planes and humans, fires raged across the planet.  It was nature's way of regeneration.  Old growth was removed and new growth lead to food sources for animals and birds.

Don't Panic:  Amazon Burning Is Mostly Farms, Not Forests.  "Amazon rainforest is burning at an unprecedented rate," declares CNN.  The Daily Beast gives us "Record Number of Wildfires Burning in Amazon Rainforest."  Here's NBC News:  "Amazon wildfires could be 'game over' for climate change fight."  Interestingly, when NASA released the satellite image on August 21, it noted that "it is not unusual to see fires in Brazil at this time of year due to high temperatures and low humidity.  Time will tell if this year is a record breaking or just within normal limits."  So why are there so many fires?  "Natural fires in the Amazon are rare, and the majority of these fires were set by farmers preparing Amazon-adjacent farmland for next year's crops and pasture," soberly explains The New York Times.  "Much of the land that is burning was not old-growth rain forest, but land that had already been cleared of trees and set for agricultural use."  It is routine for farmers and ranchers in tropical areas burn their fields to control pests and weeds and to encourage new growth in pastures.

Yes, Immigrants Should Be Less Dependent On U.S. Welfare, And So Should Everyone Else.  The Trump administration announced long-awaited "public charge" immigration regulations this week, and the furor immediately kicked up to derangement level.  Reason's Shikha Dalmia called the policy a "complete abuse of the original understanding" of the law.  In the Washington Post, opinion writer Paul Waldman said the policy sends a message:  "We hate you and we don't want you here, and if you come we will treat you with all the cruelty we can muster."  CNN's legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin went so far as to call the proposed regulation "un-American."  There is very little nuance left in political discourse.  Every administration policy is said to be the key to saving America or the final step in dooming it, depending on your point of view.

(Anti-)Social Media Inciting Hatred.  Twitter artificially increases circulation of the most divisive and polarizing topics by making them Trending.  It directly benefits from inflaming conflicts through increased user engagement, translating into higher ad revenues.  It indirectly benefits from such conduct because lib jornos, MSM, and other agitators enjoy such conflicts and promote Twitter to further the contention.  Twitter was praised for fueling the Ferguson riots in 2014.  Facebook apparently so envied Twitter that it hired left leaning reporters to manipulate its own Trending section.

Press exploits the kids of illegals hauled off in immigration raid.  The press is having a field day exploiting children to attack President Trump and his effort to re-establish rule of law in immigration.  Tossing all previous compunction about showing a child's face on national television out the window, they put the cameras right in a little girl's face to get her to talk and cry about a recent immigration raid in Mississippi.  No blue dot for her over this little girl's face, they went full frontal instead, as if a child that young were capable of giving consent.  Now the video will follow the girl all her life, and will likely end up a topic for mocking memes, something no 11 year-old deserves.  Not a problem for the big-buck press, though, such as CBS, which in fact, does this a lot.

Red Flags and White Supremacists.  For the past two years, the left's 'go to' words were "Russia," "Mueller," and "collusion."  Mueller's investigation and report were a big swing and a miss and not surprisingly these words have quickly been erased from the vocabularies of cable news anchors and their panels.  On a dime, coincident with a handful of mass shootings, the left's new favorite words are "racist" and "white supremacist."

The Media's Disgusting Bloodlust.  If you pay serious attention to network and cable commentators after a mass shooting, you will see something nearly as alarming as the atrocities themselves.  Set aside, for a moment, the horror of the event about which they are holding forth and it will become obvious that their solemn expressions are well-rehearsed affectations that mask a morbid glee.  As you lament truncated lives and traumatized survivors, these creatures count eyeballs and clicks.  While you worry about the health of our society, they search for a connection to some conservative cause or politician.  And the print media are just as ghoulish.

The Media Crossed a Line This Week and There's No Going Back.  [Scroll down]  It really does feel like we are coming apart at the seams, with near majorities of the country being accused of "white supremacy" by some major figures simply for supporting a politician.  Driving the division, broad brushing, and hatred this week had been the liberal media.  Whether it's newspapers amplifying the disgusting rhetoric of people like Beto O'Rourke and Elizabeth Warren or the constant stream of divisive, racially tinged editorials that are being pushed out, there's no question of their role.  The cable news beat has been even worse, with one MSNBC host actually saying that Donald Trump wants there to be mass shootings while another threatened business owners as complicit in white supremacy who donate to the GOP.

CNN roasted over debate production, format: 'A disservice to serious people'.  CNN faced backlash for its first primary debate of the 2020 campaign season, with members of the media comparing its production to a sporting event or movie trailer and others lamenting the time spent to kick off the event.  Journalists noted that the event started on Tuesday night [7/30/2019] at 8 p.m. with an introduction video, a commercial break and opening statements.  The first question to one of the ten candidates was not asked until 8:23 p.m., however.

The latest pathetic chapter in CNN's quest to 'prove' Trump is a racist.  As LU's Howard Portnoy noted yesterday [7/21/2019], the first of what are likely to be a rash of stories in which "a person of color claims that he was told by a person of pallor to go back where he came from" occurred over the weekend.  The alleged victim, who has since walked back her accusation, is a black Georgia state lawmaker named Erica Thomas, whose title instantly catapulted the story to national news status.  The alleged perpetrator is a white man who was standing behind her in a grocery checkout line.  Enter CNN, which is never slow to jump on liberal bandwagons.  The network posted an "open casting call" to its Facebook page asking "immigrants" who have been victimized by Donald Trump or his policies to come forward and share their stories.

The Editor says...
The story turned out to be a fake hate crime.

Media cried wolf:  Calling every Republican a racist lost its bite.  Once upon a time in the world of cable news, a guest or host or anchor calling anyone a racist would have considerable impact.  From what we've seen this week, when it comes to that word, those days are long gone.  A person simply can't turn on the news or scroll Twitterfor even more than a minute before hearing the word "racist" or "racism."  For example, CNN and MSNBC said the word "racist" more than 1,100 times from Sunday to Tuesday, according to a tally conducted by Grabien Media, an online media production and news prep service.  The count, which doesn't include on-screen graphics commonly known as chyrons, [...]

The excerpt below appears to have been extracted from Closed Captioning.
Joe Concha:  According to Grabien Media, Since Sunday, Word 'Racist' [has been] Said on CNN, MSNBC More than 2,200 Times.  There is an actual number around this that since Sunday [7/14/2019] according to gradient [sic] media, the word racist has been said on CNN and MSNBC alone, more than 2200 times.  I don't even know if that is physically or magnetically possible, but that is what has been happening this weekend the myopic focus completely.  [Video clip]

Greg Gutfeld Mocks CNN, MSNBC for 1,100 Uses of 'Racist' in Two Days on Trump.  On Tuesday night's episode of The Five, Fox News pundit Greg Gutfeld mocking the collective mass hysteria of CNN and MSNBC over President Trump's latest tweets against radical first-term Congresswomen.  Gutfeld summarized the hysterics to a T with a simple word count:  "We are reaching peak racism right now.  CNN and MSNBC, according to The Hill this morning, had said the word racist 1,100 times.  That was this morning [7/16/2019] since Sunday [7/14/2019].  Ok, so today's Tuesday... I think when it's 1,100 times by Tuesday afternoon, I'd call that maybe an overreaction.  It's hysterical and it's hysteria."

Media coverage of Hurricane Barry was the real disaster.  There will be no media awards for Al Roker or the Washington Post in recognition of their coverage of Hurricane Barry.  At least if the people living in New Orleans have a say in the matter.  The weekend weather event, fortunately, was nowhere nearly as bad as was predicted in some media accounts.  That's a good thing.  The bad thing, though, is the over-hyped media coverage of Tropical Storm Barry that briefly became Hurricane Barry (a Category 1 storm) before it returned to being a tropical storm.  Barry made landfall Saturday at Intracoastal City, about 160 miles west of New Orleans.  Unfortunately, to read or listen to media coverage, you would have heard calls for mass evacuation in New Orleans, well outside of where the storm hit.  The word "evacuation" has its own connotations for residents on the Gulf Coast and it is not a word to be used lightly.  For a television weather forecaster to suggest such an action when the local authorities are not calling for it, the situation can turn unnecessarily dangerous.

Power Outage in New York — Dramatic Media — Rest of Country 'Meh'.  Fox News talking hair Leland Vitter uses his best dramatic voice, channels his inner Shep, and proclaims the end of the known universe is nigh, because the power went out in a part of Manhattan, New York City.

Could I have some news with my emotions, please?  Emotion now blankets the media landscape like an infant's crib at bedtime.  Google "Shepard Smith emotional," and up come nearly 3 million results, many of them focused on the Fox anchor's recent visceral response to immigrant suffering.  A search of "Rachel Maddow crying" delivers more than 1 million offerings, many for the MSNBC host's reaction to border detentions and the Mueller report.  "Brooke Baldwin tears" uncovers nearly 2 million entries for the CNN reporter's reaction to a variety of news events.  They are not alone.  Contemporary culture trusts feelings over facts, rewards heated emotion — tears or anger — and rejects medium cool.  The effect on journalism is unmistakable.  And a lot of the blame can be placed on those all-too-common twin devils:  television and the internet.

Debunked: The absurd story about smartphones causing kids to sprout horns.  The Washington Post on Thursday [6/20/2019] published a story suggesting that the use of mobile devices is causing young people to sprout horns from their skulls.  But a look at the scientific data behind the story finds that such a splashy takeaway is tenuous at best — and atrocious reporting at worst.  The Post's story was primarily based on a study published back in February 2018 by two Australian researchers.  It earned fresh attention last week after being mentioned in a BBC feature on how modern life is supposedly transforming the human skeleton.  The study was published in Nature's open source journal Scientific Reports, which is supposedly peer-reviewed.  But the study has significant limitations and flaws, and the Post breezed over them for a sensationalized story.

No, Teen Vogue, you should not promote prostitution as a career choice.  The Internet is a crazy place, made crazier with a desire from many platforms to be shocking just to get readership.  Clickbait headlines and outrageous, negative stories complete with aggressive phrases like "owned" and "called out" litter websites and their corresponding social media accounts, which all do their best to out-shock each other to capture readers' limited attention.  While this insanity is definitely detrimental to our health as a society, it deserves even more scrutiny when directed at children.

Arsenic found in bottled water sold at Whole Foods, Walmart, Target.  When you pay premium prices, you expect a premium product — but that's not necessarily the case with bottled water.  California nonprofit Center for Environmental Health has revealed that water bottle brands Peñafiel, owned by Keurig Dr. Pepper, and Starkey, owned by Whole Foods, contain levels of highly toxic arsenic that are above the legal limit. [...] Other symptoms of arsenic poisoning include stomach pain and nausea, vomiting and diarrhea, numbness, even paralysis or blindness.

The Editor says...
This is nothing but alarmism, brought to you by an environmental activist group and gladly passed along by the New York Post.  There's not enough arsenic in bottled water to give anyone arsenic poisoning.  The "legal limit" for arsenic content in bottled water is probably so low that it's easy to exceed that limit.

No, Your Kid Isn't Growing Horns Because Of Cellphone Use.  This week, the Washington Post grabbed plenty of attention for a story that claimed that kids are actually growing "horns" because of cell phone use.  The story, which leans on 2016 and 2018 research out of Australia, was cribbing off of [a] more nuanced piece by the BBC on how skeletal adaptation to modern living changes are kind of a thing.  The Post's more inflammatory take was accompanied by a wide variety of other stories proclaiming that today's children are growing horns and bone spurs because they use their [...] cellphones too much!

ABC's '08 Prediction:  NYC Under Water from Climate Change By June 2015.  New York City underwater?  Gas over $9 a gallon?  A carton of milk costs almost $13?  Remember when that happened on June 12, 2015?  No?  This was the wildly-inaccurate world of 2015 predicted by ABC News 11 years ago this week.  Appearing on Good Morning America in 2008, Bob Woodruff hyped Earth 2100, a special that pushed apocalyptic predictions of the then-futuristic 2015.  The segment included supposedly prophetic videos, such as a teenager declaring, "It's June 8th, 2015.  One carton of milk is $12.99."  (On the actual June 8, 2015, a gallon of milk cost, on average, $3.39.)  Another clip featured this prediction for 2015 "Gas reached over $9 a gallon."  (In reality, gas cost an average of $2.75 four years ago.)

Paper to staff:  Use 'climate crisis' ... 'change' is 'too gentle'.  Staff at the Guardian newspaper of London, England, has been directed to address "global warming" more aggressively and use "climate crisis" or "climate emergency" instead of "climate change," which it considers "too passive and gentle."

The Media Press Dems for Impeachment Porn.  [This article examines] the motivation of the media as they continue to peddle impeachment.  They know it would be political suicide for the Democrats because only a minority of voters supports removing the President, yet they crave the countless clicks and eyeballs the circus would inevitably produce.  But the Democratic leadership, their antipathy for the President notwithstanding, is loath to take the leap just to provide impeachment porn for the media.

Climate change scare stories reach the point of psychological terrorism.  The corporate media cartels have become hubs of hatred and "journo-terrorism" that targets the psyche of the masses.  The quack science hoax of so-called "climate change" is used to terrorize the public into believing that their planet will somehow be destroyed by carbon dioxide — the very molecule that has been rapidly re-greening the Earth over the past four decades, according to NASA.  Now, a new round of "science" has been studying the mental stress of the victims of this psychological terrorism pushed by the dishonest media, and they've reached an even more bizarre conclusion.  Scientists now claim that climate change is causing "mental anguish" among humans.  Seriously.  Of course, the real source of the mental anguish is the lies and panic propaganda of the corporate media and the pathetic scientific establishment which has figured out that if you want more government grant money, you have to conduct "research" that identifies some new crisis to be blamed on climate change.  In fact, the very phrase "climate change" isn't scary enough yet to achieve the desired goal of mass mental terrorism, so media outlets around the world are now ordering their obedient writers to start using the phrase "climate crisis."

The hoax and due diligence.  Nothing illustrates the decline of serious journalism more than the fact that many of the major media, particularly CNN and MSNBC, have participated (and to some extent continue to participate) in massive hoaxes which would have been easily disproved with basic due diligence.  The first and least important hoax was that of Michael Avenatti.  He appeared on CNN and MSNBC more than 100 times where he was touted as an expert on many things, particularly the alleged misdeeds of President Trump.  Fawning hosts on these networks even referred to him as presidential material — yet he was nothing more than a conman.  He now faces about 400 years in prison if he is convicted on the many charges in several different courts.

Jussie Smollett [is] just a symptom of the fake outrage disease.  Remember folk expressions about the wisdom of being careful?  "Look before you leap."  "Measure twice, cut once."  "Don't go off half-cocked."  All of this should go double for online culture.  Instead lives are being destroyed over misleading, unfair or just plain false accusations.  People are being turned into public enemies or even fired after being framed for racism, homophobia or other perceived social crimes.  Others are casting themselves as victims of hate in order to line their pockets.  These days anyone with a phone in his hand can be P.T. Barnum.  And people who congratulate themselves for being unusually tolerant, kind-hearted and impervious to misinformation are the leaders of frenzied online mobs who are pitchforking innocent people.  Fake news is bad enough.  Fake outrage is even worse.

Climate hysteria.  The UK Guardian Newspaper decided that you're not sufficiently alarmed about climate doom.  Climate change is no longer the term of choice with the Guardian and other news outlets.  Get ready to hear the newly invented terms, "climate emergency," "climate crisis," "climate breakdown," and "global heating."  By the way, when did it become the job of a news organization to hype public concern over an issue instead of just reporting the facts?

Will the Media Ever Pay a Price For Its Irresponsibility?  [Michael] Avenatti was entirely the creation of the media, right down to the idea, which CNN and MSNBC took seriously, that he could be a presidential candidate in 2020.  It is emerging now that the media knew first hand that Avenatti is a first class jerk, from the outrageous and rude way he treated the low- and mid-level media people (producers, etc) he dealt with in his nonstop media campaign.  But because he was saying what the media wanted to hear (Trump is a horrible human being), the media were willing overlook all of the slime this reptile was leaving in media green rooms and on TV sets.

Democrats Claim 'Constitutional Crisis,' Media Repeat It 386 Times.  Evidently Democrats need only utter the words "constitutional crisis" for the media to report it as fact.  Watch cable "news" these days, and you'll surely see talking heads parroting the Democratic line that the Trump administration's noncompliance with House Committee subpoenas amounts to a constitutional crisis.  While a small handful of analysts and guest legal scholars disagree, TV hosts continue to push the idea uncritically, with some even urging the alleged crisis be used as grounds for impeachment.  MRC analysts looked at all coverage on broadcast (ABC, CBS, NBC) and liberal cable (CNN, MSNBC) networks from May 8 to 12, finding 386 utterances of the term "constitutional crisis" by hosts, analysts, or guest journalists.  This count did not include cases in which the term was used by political partisans, such as members of Congress, former administration officials, or Democratic and Republican strategists.

Children Have to Listen to Fake News, Too, and It's Not Good for Them.  [Scroll down]  Kids are being propagandized about the ticking climate clock in school, on TV, and everywhere on social media.  It just doesn't help when the parents are scared, too.  A 40-year-old Salt Lake City mother said the release of the U.N.'s latest climate report caused her three teenage daughters a severe emotional crisis.  "There was a lot of crying.  They told me, 'We know what's coming, and it's going to be really rough.'"  Because mom believes it, too, there's not much help she can offer.  "I want to have hope," she said, "but the reports are showing that this isn't going to stop, so all we can do is cope."  I don't believe that these children are really studying climate reports; it's the media's hysterical coverage that's upsetting them.

CNN's Jim Acosta Makes A Fool Of Himself At The WH Medal Of Freedom Ceremony.  CNN's Jim Acosta is in a running gun battle with April Ryan for the worst White House reporter currently on the beat.  Acosta's self-aggrandizement and constant editorializing in briefings have become the butt of jokes everywhere.  His false sense of grandeur has led him to write a book proclaiming how dangerous it is to "tell the truth" in America.  Because Acosta's life is so harrowing.

Scarborough: 'History Has Chosen' the Dem Party to 'Stand Up and Defend the Rule of Law'.  As President Donald Trump continues to spar with House Democrats over subpoenas, MSNBC "Morning Joe" host Joe Scarborough applauded Democrats, saying that "history has chosen" their party to "stand up and defend the rule of law" in America.  Scarborough said that as a former Republican, it makes him "sad" to see the GOP "breaking the law."  "You can look at all of the document requests that they've ignored," Scarborough outlined.  "They're in contempt of Congress."

What did she say that isn't absolutely true?
What strange personification:  Does History take a vote, or what does it take to make up History's mind?

Parts of the American Media Are Willfully Twisting News to Stoke Racial Tension.  President Trump is cheering on someone who has not only supported the President, but withstood an online campaign of harassment for doing so.  The media would prefer to make this a race issue and fan the flames of racial tension.  It is unfortunate.

MSNBC Reporter Sticks A Mic In Robert Mueller's Face After Easter Services.  MSNBC reporter Mike Viqueira confronted Robert Mueller with a microphone and camera crew after the former special counsel exited Easter Sunday [4/21/2019] church services with his wife.

CBS Incites Violence Against Political Opponents.  "It's time to punch a few Nazis."  It's hard to shock me, but I was shocked by the trailer for CBS's "The Good Fight." [...] Promoting violence in the abstract is not illegal.  According to the Supreme Court case Brandenburg v. Ohio, speech is legal unless it "is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action."  The trailer showed an unprovoked assault against a real person.  It told viewers it is time to punch Nazis.  If this isn't a call to violence — at least against Richard Spencer — what is?  If the show had named almost anyone else, there would surely be criminal charges.  While we are to attack "neo-Nazis," communists or non-white extremists are apparently off limits.

Mainstream Media's Worshipping of Michael Avenatti.  Remember celebrity lawyer Michael Avenatti, the man who represented porn star Stormy Daniels?  Well, the media's favorite guest is back in the news after being indicted on 36 charges Thursday [4/11/2019].  Two hundred fifty-four — that's how many times Avenatti was featured on major TV networks in one year, according to NewsBusters.  CNN alone featured Avenatti a staggering 121 times.  Now he has been charged with numerous crimes, including tax evasion, fraud, and stealing money from clients — including scamming a paraplegic man out of a $4 million settlement.

Media exaggerate impact of US-Mexico border closure.  Let's hope that President Trump's "one-year warning" issued to Mexico Thursday to halt the flood of illegal drugs and migrants entering the U.S. — or face a border closure and new tariffs — will influence Mexico to make some real changes.  Unfortunately, the media's continual exaggerations of the dangers of closing the border may give Mexico the idea that the U.S. lacks the willpower to carry through on the president's threat.  If Mexican leaders conclude Trump is bluffing, there will be little reason for them to change their behavior.

Media ignore border debacle to feed us avocado stories.  Here at the Mexican border in San Diego, the local television press is always looking for ways to Get Trump.  The illegal immigrant sob stories aren't working all that much anymore.  So now they're reporting on President Trump's threatened border shutdown over it as a matter of the price of avocados in San Diego. [...] Obviously, the intent is to create a unified voice to whip up opposition to Trump's vow to shut the U.S.-Mexican border on public hysteria grounds, supposedly because we San Diegans just can't possibly live without our guac and margaritas, we're too la-la over here, and someone messing with our avocado supply should be enough to trigger the fury of Surfer Dude Nation.

Press goes Code Avocado against Trump.  How can you take seriously an occupation that repeatedly dives off the deep end over the tiniest of items?  Avocado sales in the United States are a little more than $2 billion a year.  In a $20 trillion dollar economy, that is 1% of 1% of all activity.  Mexico's $1.2 trillion economy will not suffer much either.  While shutting the border would be a hardship for avocado growers, open borders cost hundreds of Americans their lives every year.  But thanks to the media savvy of Steve Barnard, president and chief executive of Mission Produce, the largest distributor and grower of avocados in the world, the press is on a mission to save avocados, not American lives.

The Mueller-Industrial Complex Collapses.  So much media is premediated now, it's almost impossible to find something whose payload isn't partly composed of practice for future events.  Most of the time, nobody even notices this phenomenon.  Premediation works because it homes in on natural anxieties or desires amplified by the hyper-mediated ecosystem in which television, smartphones, social media, and all the rest rot and reanimate.  Whom should I consider voting for in the next election?  Am I going to die if I board a plane?  Those are questions whose future answers seem to demand consideration today.

CBS & NBC Cheer Student Climate Strike, Warn 'Future Might Not Exist'.  On Thursday [3/14/2019] and Friday, CBS This Morning and NBC's Today show celebrated left-wing student activists around the world preparing to walk out of their classrooms to "demand action on climate change."  The CBS report took a particularly dark turn as correspondent Tony Dokoupil warned of "a future that might not even exist" for the young protesters.  "Groups of students across America say they will skip class tomorrow for the first national school strike over climate change," co-host Gayle King proudly announced on Thursday's CBS This Morning.  "Tomorrow's protests are planned in more than 130 U.S. cities and about 90 countries worldwide," she added.

Study: White People Responsible for Blacks' and Latinos' Higher Exposure to Pollution.  A study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences claims that white people contribute more to pollution than black and Latino people, but the latter suffer from it more than the white polluters.  "The air that Americans breathe isn't equal," USA Today says in its report on the study.  "Blacks and Hispanics disproportionately breathe air that's been polluted by non-Hispanic whites, according to a study," USA Today says.  "This new research quantifies for the first time the racial gap between who causes air pollution — and who breathes it."

Rebuttal:
Who Declared this to Be Crazy Week?  There are so many things stupidly wrong with this whole story that I don't even know where to begin.  First, this study, and many others like it, anchor their alarm on the supposed fact that particulate pollution causes about 42,000 premature deaths in the U.S. every year.  Though the EPA relies on this figure, the epidemiology behind it is very weak.  But without this scary statistic, a lot of regulations would fail even the most generous cost-benefit test.  Second, particulate levels have been falling fast for the last 25 years, and will continue to fall in the future.  Most studies such as this one are relying on obsolete data.  What this means is that most black and Hispanic Americans, even in the places that still have the highest air pollution levels like the Los Angeles basin, are breathing air today that is lower in ambient pollution than white people inhaled 20 years ago.  Don't expect NPR or anyone else to put it in perspective this way.  They've got an agenda and a narrative that needs to be kept up.

Alabama Tornado Victims Ask Trump To Sign Bibles; Meltdown Ensues.  Another day, another obtuse, ridiculous meltdown in the media over something Donald Trump did.  This time we head to Alabama, in the wake of dozens of deaths and hundreds who lost everything due to a vicious string of tornadoes. [...] This kind of petty craziness, played on a loop daily by our media, is why Trump has a much better shot of winning in 2020 than he otherwise would have.

American Air Is Clean And Getting Cleaner.  [A]ir quality is very good pretty much everywhere in the United States.  This fact stands in stark contrast to utterly absurd claims in the media, such as blaming air pollution for killing 155,000 Americans.  Why is there such a disconnect between reality and what the media say?  Because bad news is intrinsically more interesting than good news.  It's the same reason that murder and violence grab top headlines, even though both are near historic lows. [...] Air pollution is not a problem in the United States.  It is a problem in Europe, and it is a monumental problem in Africa, Asia, and the Middle East.

Media Hypes Roger Stone 'Revelation' That Has Been Public For A Year.  News outlets and media pundits on Friday [2/15/2019] seized on a court filing in the special counsel's case against Roger Stone that referred to communication the longtime Trump confidant had with WikiLeaks and Guccifer 2.0, the group of alleged Russian operatives suspected of stealing Democrats' emails during the 2016 campaign.  The court filing, which was touted as new, bombshell evidence by numerous news sources, including CNN and MSNBC host Rachel Maddow, may be less than meets the anti-Trump eye.

Let's Chill about Hate Crimes.  "Jussie Smollett, one of the stars of the television show 'Empire,' was attacked in Chicago by 2 assailants who yelled racial and homophobic slurs," tweeted the New York Times on January 29.  Mark the tone of absolute certainty about an unconfirmed claim.  Many other news outlets took the same tack.  "Celebrities, lawmakers rally behind Jussie Smollett in wake of brutal attack," reported ABC News.  "Jussie Smollett Performs at Troubadour Just Days After Chicago Attack: 'I Had to Be Here Tonight'" read a Los Angeles Times headline.  Many commenters linked the alleged attack to larger alleged sicknesses:  "The racist, homophobic attack on Jussie Smollett is far-right America's endgame," tweeted GQ, in a sentiment echoed by many others.

Bezos vs. the Enquirer Could Be a Watershed.  What to make of the battle between Jeff Bezos and the National Enquirer, which we will delight in calling the affair of Bezos, Pecker and de Becker?  Under any circumstance, the world's richest man cheating on his wife with a sexy helicopter pilot, supported by racy texts and photos, would be a story for the National Enquirer.  Tasteful Americans may wish it weren't so, but Mr. Bezos is a public figure in the Supreme Court's definition.

WaPo Spends $5.2M on Vanity Ad in [the] Wake of 1,200 Media Layoffs.  After some 1,200 people lost their media jobs last week, the far-left Washington Post spent $5.2 million to run a vanity ad during the Super Bowl.  You have to watch the Post ad to understand just how vacuous it is.  What we have here is the highest form of propaganda narrated by a Big Movie Star (Tom Hanks), produced only to give you a chronic case of the FeelSoGoodz.

The MAGA-phobic manure-spreaders of media sensationalism.  [Scroll down]  Question:  How many racist, homophobic menaces wander around the upscale Streeterville neighborhood of liberal Chicago at 2 a.m. carrying rope and bleach, yelling about "MAGA country?"  Question:  How many racist, homophobic menaces have ever heard of "Empire," could recognize Jussie Smollett, or know or care anything about his sexuality?  Despite TMZ's claim that Smollett had the "hell beat outta him" and attackers "broke his ribs" plus subjected him to a chemical attack, an ambulance was not called and he instead "self-transported" to the hospital.  CWB Chicago, a local public safety watchdog site, reported on police dispatch records documenting that Smollett's friend "Frank" refused EMS services for Smollett; no mention of bleach was made; "no or minor injury" was observed; and "officers never sent a 'flash; message with offender descriptions to field units."

An example of news media sensationalism:
It Could Take Joshua Tree 300 Years to Recover From the Government Shutdown.  Though the government shutdown may have ended last Friday [1/25/2019], Joshua Tree National Park will be feeling the ruinous effects of it for hundreds of years.  Throughout the duration of the shutdown, which lasted a record-long 35 days, national parks greatly suffered: human waste piled up, lands were littered with trash, and some campgrounds and other public areas even closed to visitors, as the parks weren't adequately staffed to stay open.  It wasn't until after Joshua Tree closed on January 2, though, that humans became excessively reckless, during which they off-roaded, graffittied rocks, started campfires in illegal areas, and cut down protected trees.

The Editor says...
Sounds like a wee bit of an exaggeration.  Human waste does not stick around for 300 years.  Neither does litter.  Neither do tire tracks.  But aside from that, the obvious solution is to privatize the park.  (By the way, graffiti is not a verb.  Neither is off-road.)  But this whole story seems very far-fetched.  Were a bunch of anarchist maniacs taking advantage the government shutdown, during which they could enter the unattended national parks and spread garbage and feces everywhere?  Sounds like a false flag to me:  Somebody went into the park and trashed it, in order to make the "government shutdown" as ghastly as possible — something that must be avoided at all cost — when in reality very few people outside of a 200-mile radius from Washington DC even noticed the five-week shutdown.

The Famed 'Doomsday Clock' Is Little More Than A Liberal Angst Meter.  When the Doomsday Clock launched in 1947, the initial setting was seven minutes to midnight.  Since then, it's gone up and down.  The furthest it got from doomsday was 17 minutes in 1991.  But it's clear from its movements over the past seven decades that the Doomsday Clock is more about politics than any sort of scientific measure of the risk of nuclear annihilation.  After all, the Clock routinely counted down after a Republican wins the White House, and ticked up when Democrats reclaim the presidency.

Apocalypse Creep.  Nothing says "end of the world" like a big fake clock.  The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists gave its annual Doomsday Clock presentation on Thursday [1/24/2019] and announced that it's still two minutes to midnight.  Last year, the group of 15 scholars and scientists moved the phony minute hand of fate 30 seconds closer to Armageddon, from two-and-a-half minutes to midnight to its present setting, 11:58 pm sharp.  By the Bulletin's logic, we're as close to the end as we've ever been.  The whole thing is adorably retro.

How the media convinces us we're all outraged — even when no one cares.  Lazy media reporters who are too lazy to even actually speak to people anymore are instead constructing Potemkin Villages of fake hate, fake disgust and fake outrage.  They're Contemptkin Villages.  No one really lives there.  The laziest hacks can build them using tweets, even tweets from anonymous Twitter accounts.  Somehow these hacks are employed at places like the BBC and the [New York] Times. [...] Shameless online editors today figure that readers will click through to anything that is supposedly making anyone mad.  And if the underlying story doesn't actually contain any evidence that anyone has blown his lid, too late!  Made ya click.

Government shutdown lessons — We could take a chainsaw to so much of government.  This government shutdown is now longer than any in history.  The media keep using the word "crisis."  "Shutdown sows chaos, confusion and anxiety!" says The Washington Post.  "Pain spreads widely."  The New York Times headlined, it's all "just too much!"  But wait.  Looking around America, I see people going about their business — families eating in restaurants, employees going to work, children playing in playgrounds, etc.  I have to ask:  Where's the crisis?

Media's anti-Trump addiction amps up the outrage and fuels the public's suspicion.  Alas, much of today's political journalism has fallen into advocacy, intentionally inflammatory, using or omitting selective details, quotes and background to make a case against President Donald Trump.  The criticism generally centers on something he did or said he would do — or something someone, usually unidentified, said he might do or is considering possibly doing.  And then in a kind of staged Kabuki dance, journalists run to gather reaction from waiting opponents who provide a predictably outraged quote calling for counteraction.  Yes, this president's name boosts ratings and clicks from both sides.  But the media's addiction to anything Trump lets this president manipulate them, which he does skillfully.  It squeezes out other important news.  And it denies Americans a set of generally-accepted facts to debate, merely providing fodder for an anti-Trump agenda and more argumentative ammo for both sides.

How many times have the media predicted doom because of Trump, and how many times have they been dead wrong?  On Thursday [1/10/2019], there was a screaming headline on Drudge saying, "Doomsday."  The article was from NBC News, and the source of the doomsday report was the ever reliable Mark Zandi of Moody's.  The purpose of the report was not to be objective news, because anyone with a brain knows that the shutdown will end soon.  The purpose was to scare the public, tamp down economic growth, and destroy Trump.

Sorry, I Don't Feel Sorry For Furloughed Feds.  Now that the nation has heard the President explain how he wants to address our immigration crisis, and we have all enjoyed the comic relief offered by Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer in lieu of a serious response, the media have launched a propaganda campaign they hope will pull the Democrats from the ditch they have driven into regarding "the wall."  But our friends in the Fourth Estate are approaching the project in a manner that merely highlights how divorced they are from the world beyond the Beltway.  Their primary focus involves the heartrending human tragedy of... idle bureaucrats.

The Media Was Still Unglued in 2018.  The comparisons to dictators (especially Hitler) were once shocking, but no longer.  These smears arrive almost daily.  Take perpetually malcontent Steve Schmidt lecturing on MSNBC. Trump "creates a mass sense of victimization amongst his base," he said.  "And then he asserts extraordinary claims of power to protect the victims from the scapegoated populations and the nefarious conspiracy.  That is fundamentally illiberal, deeply un-American, and, frankly, could be straight out of Munich circa 1928."  Then there's the racial panic.  "Killing black people is an old American tradition, but it is experiencing a revival in the Trump era," wrote New York Times columnist Paul Krugman.  Trump & Co. is responsible for encouraging the murder of blacks?  O-o-K.  Krugman wrote this junk after a lone gunman killed two African-Americans at a supermarket in Louisville, Kentucky.  Any terrible event can be quickly blamed on Trump.

Chuck Todd's Perpetual Hype Machine: 'What If the President IS the Crisis?'Meet the Press host Chuck Todd has proclaimed he thinks NBC and MSNBC are a very "fact-based environment," unlike Fox News.  But his opening to his show on Sunday sounded like a dramatic editorial, underlining all of Trump's problems with Republican leaders and conservative radio and TV hosts, throwing together the shutdown, the resignation of the defense secretary, and the stock market decline into one grand opinionated summary:  [Video clip]

Flashback: Media Silence After Obama Fires General Mattis Without Even a Call.  The liberal media and DC establishment suffered a complete meltdown on Thursday [12/20/2018] after the sudden resignation by Secretary of Defense James Mattis.  Talk of impeachment, coups, and suicide abound over fears that Mattis was the last 'adult' keeping President Trump in check.  Mattis resigned as Trump moved to assert mastery over his presidency this week in key areas after nearly two years on the job.

Recap and overview of the Jim Acosta tantrum:
Profiles in Absurdity:  Jim Acosta as First Amendment 'Hero'.  The underlying facts are by now well-known:  The insufferable Acosta, surely the most obnoxious "correspondent" ever to hold a White House press pass — a dubious distinction in a competition that includes Sam Donaldson (ABC) and the late Helen Thomas (UPI), among others — had his credentials suspended after a particularly abrasive encounter with President Trump at a November 7 presser.  In a widely publicized incident, Acosta harangued at length, refused to relinquish the microphone when directed to do so, and pushed away a young female intern who was trying to pass the mic to another reporter.  White House press passes have always been viewed as discretionary and subject to regulation, in order reasonably to limit the size of the press pool and ensure proper decorum.  Reporters are expected to be courteous and to exhibit professional behavior.  The attention-seeking Acosta, as is his custom, was grandstanding at the press conference, and breached longstanding protocols by insisting on arguing disrespectfully with the president.  For this, his "hard pass" — necessary to gain entrance to the White House — was temporarily suspended.  CNN was not barred from the White House; only Acosta was.

Like Drug Addicts, Reporters Demean Themselves For Just One More Trump Story.  But, it's not enough.  It's not getting them the high they want.  The high they crave.  The traffic, the clicks, the views, the response... none of it is the same.  There's gotta be a stronger dose somewhere.  So, when it comes time to cover the funeral of the former president, they seek out something stronger.  Trump is sitting by the Obamas and the Clintons!  He's not reciting the Creed!  He is doing this or not doing that!  And in the process, the funeral is no longer about George H.W. Bush.  It is about Trump.  It's wrong.  They know it's wrong.  They can't help themselves, though.  They are addicts.

A little hysteria can make the news go down.  The mainstream/legacy/hothouse media has been rubbing sticks together for months, trying to start a fire under the White House to frighten the administration into abolishing fossil fuels before Christmas.  Hysteria used to be the sworn enemy of newspapers.  (Television, not so much.)  Now everyone manufactures it.  Helene Cooper of The New York Times thinks it's OK to spread a little hysteria because becoming "hysterical" is the right and proper response.

Trump hatred fueled media's yearlong obsession with Avenatti and Stormy.  2018 was the year the mainstream media willingly handed whatever was left of their credibility and dignity over to an aging porn star/stripper and her odious, ethically challenged attorney. [...] At one point, Mr. Avenatti had become such a fixture on certain cable networks that it almost appeared he had joined the prime-time lineup.  Analysts at the Media Research Center categorized his appearances on CNN over a two-month period.  The results are as startling as they are embarrassing.

Another nothing-burger?  Catherine Herridge breaks down Michael Cohen's guilty plea 'bombshell'.  Early Thursday morning word broke that President Donald Trump's former personal lawyer Michael Cohen had pleaded guilty to lying to Congress during its investigation into possible Russian collusion.  Following the announcement, the perpetually hysterical left broke into cheers of gleeful applause over the belief that the president would soon be the next one to be indicted.

Trump has the goods on Democrats.  CNN was so excited on June 6, 2017.  Jim Comey was going to testify in Congress in two days.  The fired FBI director would start the ball rolling on the impeachment of the Orange Man.  The cable outlet posted a story, "Comey expected to refute Trump."  Wolf Blitzer cranked up his self-righteousness to Pope Level.  CNN attached a countdown-to-Comey clock to its chyron.  Then Comey released his opening statement to the public a day early.  Blitzer dialed down his attitude to DMV clerk.  The countdown clock disappeared.  The story was downgraded to "Comey unlikely to judge on obstruction."

Jim Acosta Will Only Behave When There's A Democrat In The White House.  President Donald Trump says he's drafting rules of decorum for White House reporters in the wake of the lawsuit involving CNN's aggressively misbehaving reporter Jim Acosta.  Funny how unruly press behavior never comes up when a Democrat is president.

White House has to tell reporters how to act like adults.  Sarah Sanders today issued rules of conduct for White House reporters.  Everyone in the press room should be embarrassed because like kindergartners, they have to be told to share the microphone and take turns asking questions.  These geniuses brought this nonsense on because they were too pathetically lame to tell Jim Acosta to sit down and shut up.  Instead, their self-important White House Correspondents Association issued a statement of support, "Journalists may use a range of approaches to carry out their jobs and the WHCA does not police the tone or frequency of the questions its members ask of powerful senior government officials, including the President.  "Such interactions, however uncomfortable they may appear to be, help define the strength of our national institutions.  We urge the White House to immediately reverse this weak and misguided action."

CNN Requests Emergency Hearing After Trump Warns Acosta's Press Pass in Jeopardy Again.  CNN host Brian Stelter reports that the White House may once again revoke White House correspondent Jim Acosta's press credential after a judge ruled to reinstate the "hard pass" last week.  The network has asked for an emergency hearing in response to the threat.  "Friday's court ruling means that a temporary restraining order is in effect for 14 days.  But W.H. officials sent Acosta a letter stating that his press pass is set to be suspended again once the restraining order expires," Stelter tweeted late Sunday [11/18/2018].

The Editor says...
The suspension of a press pass for a single ill-behaved reporter is not an emergency.

White House Notifies CNN Journalist Jim Acosta of Rules to Permanently Revoke "Hard Pass".  The White House sent a letter to CNN narrative engineer Jim Acosta notifying him his pass granting him temporary access to the White House grounds could be suspended after a temporary restraining order runs its course.

Acosta decision could make it easier for White House to kick reporters out.  In short, the judge said to the White House:  You can't throw out a reporter without going through a process.  But if you go through a process — which you, the White House, can design — then you can throw the reporter out.  In the end, it could be that Kelly's ruling will make it easier for the White House to oust reporters in the future — and to make the decision stick.

Jim Acosta is smug, and no court ruling changes that.  CNN's Jim Acosta scored some court points with a ruling that orders the White House to give back his press pass, at least for the time being.  But he still presents as a smug elitist.  He presented as an out-of-touch elitist the day he jerked away from the arm of the reaching White House intern — the day he refused to cede the microphone and cede the floor and cede his time to the many other journalists who were patiently waiting to pose questions to the president.

Jim Acosta and the Hubris of Celebrity Journalism.  When do Jim Acosta's 15 minutes of fame expire?  Has there ever been anyone less deserving of the spotlight who has managed to hog it quite so thoroughly as CNN's White House show horse?  Most recently, on Nov. 7, Acosta gave President Trump a moral lecture in the form of a loaded "question" about why Trump called the migrant "caravan" an "invasion."  According to Acosta, it is not an invasion because the migrants were hundreds of miles away, and besides, the migrants aren't going to be "climbing over walls and so on."  One week later, as we all know, members of the caravan (and of course it's not really a "caravan") were sitting astride the border wall and invading U.S. territory.  So much for Acosta's credibility.  Mind you, the president answered Acosta's "When are you going to stop beating your wife?" question, and acknowledged that he and the reporter have a difference of opinion about what an invasion is, but Acosta was pressing his left-wing agenda and not actually trying to elicit information with his "fake question."

Acosta Gets His Press Pass Back, But Trump Is the Real Winner.  It would be the easiest thing in the world for the White House to turn Acosta into a non-entity, just another cable-news squawker tut-tutting the president's decisions into a camera from the White House lawn.  Call on him, give him bland answers to his silly questions, and move on.  Or don't call on him at all!  Instead, time after time, Trump and press secretary Sarah Sanders have allowed Acosta to harrumph them into tiffs that become news stories in themselves.  Last Friday's foolishness, with Acosta white-knuckling the mic and Trump shouting and that poor intern visibly wishing she'd taken some other gig, was just the latest, greatest example.  Why?  Because the White House loves it when Acosta is in the spotlight.  He's the perfect foil to Trump, the perfect face for the administration's constant campaign against the "fake news media."

Trump everyone's hard passes then.  A federal judge today [11/16/2018] ordered President Trump to restore Jim Acosta's hard pass access to the White House despite Acosta's belligerence at a press conference.  Just about every media outlet who gets hard passes sided with Acosta. [...] Revoke all the hard passes.  Make them stand in line each day with every other reporter from outlets not so privileged seeking access.  The press wants to play hardball, so play hardball.  Why give them this privilege when they hate him?

Everyone Is Wrong About The Jim Acosta, White House Battle.  Jim Acosta is a pundit who works for CNN.  He was credentialed to attend White House press briefings, which he routinely used as opportunities to share his personal political views and animosity toward President Donald Trump.  The situation with Acosta, who is known as a shameless grandstander who seeks personal attention rather than a journalist who seeks to cover the news, came to a head last week when he repeatedly violated decorum at the White House by offering personal opinions in the place of actual questions, fighting with the president, interrupting the president, and belligerently refusing to return the White House microphone to a staff member.

Levin: 'No reporter has a constitutional right' to be in the White House.  Tuesday [11/13/2018] on the radio, LevinTV host Mark Levin called out the ridiculous stunt of CNN's lawsuit against the Trump administration over the antics of reporter Jim Acosta.  "The purpose of a presidential press conference is to allow as many reporters as possible to ask pertinent questions, and for the president to answer them.  In other words, a press conference is for the American people.  One of the difficulties the other members of the press and the president are having communicating with each other ... is Jim Acosta.  When Jim Acosta disrupts the press conference, monopolized the time, and basically gives his political opinions about a president who he constantly calls a liar, we learn nothing," Levin said.

Trump White House Responds to Judge's Ruling that CNN's Jim Acosta Has Right to Disrupt White House Pressers.  On Friday morning [11/16/2018] a federal judge ruled that the Trump White House must restore jackass Jim Acosta's hard press pass.  This is unbelievable.  In any other business this jackass would be fired — at CNN he is defended in court.

CNN's Acosta stopped being a journalist long ago.  Invariably, [Jim] Acosta makes his interactions with Trump all about himself.  The fact that the CNN reporter had his press credentials pulled — even if only temporarily — will surely feed the legend and perhaps add a couple of zeros to his speaking fee or a future book deal.  Still, Acosta deserved the rebuke.  He was arrogant, rude and sanctimonious.  He was sent to cover the story, and he made himself the story.  He was supposed to ask questions, but instead he tried to "challenge" the president about the refugee caravan.  He asked several questions, instead of one.  And when he got answers, he rejected them.

When reporters stick together — as a mob.  [Scroll down]  Acosta wasn't there to ask questions.  He was there to lecture and make accusations, as were they all.  But Acosta's disrespect and contemptuousness is special... especially obnoxious.  He is a hothead and, knowing his act, why he gets a front row seat at these briefings would be my first question.  He is no reporter, but rather a Resist Trump community organizer.

Progressive Politics Are Not Really Progressive.  When CNN White House Correspondent Jim Acosta stages his periodic psychodramatic shout-downs of Sarah Huckabee Sanders or Donald Trump, he is no Edward R. Murrow bucking Joe McCarthy, but rather he is one-upping his progressive like-minded journalists, virtue-signaling to his CNN liberal audience, and scoring career chits with his left-wing bosses and employers.

Jim Acosta isn't disliked because of his 'hard questions' but because he doesn't ask any real ones.  There are a lot of ways to describe what CNN's Jim Acosta does when he shows up for a White House press briefing or a press conference with President Trump: stunt, showboat, grandstand.  But you cannot say he's there to ask "hard questions," as the New York Times characterized his routine in an editorial Thursday [11/8/2018].

Fearmongering on the Left Has Been Ignored in 2018 Coverage.  A CNN screen graphic bluntly asked on the morning of Tuesday's midterms elections, "Will fear win?" I think the answer is "yes," but not necessarily for the same reasons as the Chyron With Attitude.  CNN was referring to President Donald Trump's aggressive rhetoric against illegal immigration, sending troops to the border, and warning of the consequences of Democratic victories in the 2018 elections.  It wasn't alone in portraying the race as Democrats Vs.  The Fearmongerers.  The Washington Post reported Sunday that Trump is "painting an astonishingly apocalyptic vision of America under Democratic control in the campaign's final days, unleashing a torrent of falsehoods and portraying his political opponents as desiring crime, squalor and poverty."

Senate report paints devastating profile of Justice Kavanaugh accuser Julie Swetnick.  A new Senate committee report questions the credibility of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh's three main accusers, dishing out the worst criticism at gang-rape accuser Julie Swetnick.  The 400-page report by the Judiciary Committee's Republican staff paints a devastating portrait of Ms. Swetnick.  She made the most sensational charges of the women accusers and won airtime on national TV.  The report depicts her as dangerous, a serial complainer, a liar, mentally unstable and cruel toward her parents.  It turns out that in one of Ms. Swetnick's previous sexual harassment complaints she was represented by Debra Katz, the Democratic-connected attorney who took the case of Christine Blasey Ford.  The Palo Alto, California, psychologist emerged as the first accuser of Justice Kavanaugh, who ultimately won Senate confirmation on Oct. 5 to the Supreme Court.

Democrats have intentionally divided the country and stoked fear among the public for a very long time.  Democrats have always tried to scare the people on food stamps, Medicare, social security and Medicaid.  Republicans want to starve children.  Democrats support Iran that spreads terrorism and pledges death to Israel and death to America.  Democrats are the ones who support Louis Farrakhan, not Republicans.  Democrats are the ones that had the KKK leader as an honorable leader in the Senate for years, not Republicans.  Democrats are the ones that pushed the fictional "hands up don't shoot" narrative to gin up racial hate and hate towards cops, not Republicans.  Who knows how many deaths and how much violence that caused.  Democrats are the ones who created a fictional dossier to destroy a political opponent and used the Justice Department to spy on them.  The person that shot up the Jews in Pittsburgh hates Trump yet somehow the media blames Trump.  The media has supported Democrats no matter what they say or do and now they are willing enablers and participants in seeking to destroy Trump and other Republicans no matter how much propaganda they have to spread.

'Nothing to Gain,' Kavanaugh Accuser Raises Nearly $1 Million.  During the crucible of Brett Kavanaugh's Senate confirmation hearings, Democrats repeatedly asserted that Christine Blasey Ford had "nothing to gain" by coming forward with her explosive accusation of attempted rape against the Supreme Court nominee.  "You had absolutely nothing to gain by bringing these facts to the Senate Judiciary Committee," Sen. Dick Durbin said during her testimony last month.  This sentiment was echoed by other Democrats, who presented it as evidence that Ford was telling the truth.  "I want to thank you," added California Sen. Kamala Harris, "because you clearly have nothing to gain for what you have done."  In fact, Ford stands to gain some $1 million and counting from national crowdfunding campaigns launched by friends and other supporters, while she is said to be fielding book offers.

Avenatti's media honeymoon is over following Kavanaugh accuser backlash.  No private citizen has enjoyed more free airtime on two-thirds of the major cable news networks than Michael Avenatti has in 2018.  Tune in to CNN and there's a decent chance you'll find him there.  If he isn't on CNN, there's an equally good chance he'll be on MSNBC.

Are We on the Verge of Civil War?  The internet and social media often descend into an electronic lynch mob.  In a nanosecond, an insignificant local news story goes viral.  Immediately hundreds of millions of people use it to drum up the evils or virtues of either progressivism or conservatism.  Anonymity is a force multiplier of these tensions.  Fake online identities provide cover for ever greater extremism — on the logic that no one is ever called to account for his or her words.  Speed is also the enemy of common sense and restraint.  Millions of bloggers rush to be the first to post their take on a news event, without much worry about whether it soon becomes a "fake news" moment of unsubstantiated gossip and fiction.

CNN's Jake Tapper Dedicates Segment to Trump's Penis.  CNN aired a segment about Stormy Daniels' new book that described what Donald Trump's genitals looks like on The Lead with Jake Tapper Tuesday [9/18/2018].

Weather Channel Defends Reporter Mocked for 'So Dramatic' Hurricane Florence Coverage.  The Weather Channel is defending one of their own after a video of Hurricane Florence coverage went viral.  The video, uploaded to Twitter, shows Weather Channel meteorologist and reporter Mike Seidel bracing in the wind during a live shot in Wilmington, NC.  As he is struggling to keep his footing, two people walk behind him showing no signs of struggle.  Twitter was not impressed.

Hilarious video shows journalist 'bravely' reporting on Hurricane Florence — until two men in shorts casually stroll past.  A Weather Channel reporter looked to have played up the drama and severity of Hurricane Florence in a hilarious video that has been circulating on Twitter.  Weather Channel reporter Mike Seidel was shooting a live segment in Wilmington, North Carolina, on Friday [9/14/2018] as winds barreled around him.  In the clip, Seidel appears to brace his feet deeper into the grass so that he won't go with the wind.

Teens Stroll Past Reporter Who Can Barely Stand in Raging Winds.  Weather Channel correspondent Mike Seidel in Wilmington, North Carolina, looks like he's gallantly fighting the raging winds as he courageously reported live from Hurricane Florence on Friday [9/14/2018].  "This is about as nasty as it's been," Seidel said dramatically.  Shortly after he made the comment, two teens in shorts are seen in the background strolling along, taking cell phone photos, having no problem at all. [...] As an aside, did you notice how the media now counts homes without power?  They don't count homes, they estimate the number of people who might be in a home and multiple [sic] it by the actual homes.

Media Hype:  Mueller Probe 'Bombshell' Turns Out To Be Major Dud.  According to various mainstream media figures this week, Special Counsel Robert Mueller was all but certain to drop a bombshell Friday [8/31/2018] that would shake Washington, D.C., to its core.  It didn't happen.  NBC's Meet the Press host Chuck Todd on Thursday kicked off the Mueller "bombshell" frenzy, warning viewers that Friday could go down in history as a turning point in the Russia investigation.

The 'Echo Chamber' Isn't A Conspiracy Theory, It's A Fact.  When I finally got to the end of a supposed blockbuster piece by the New Yorker's Adam Entous and Ronan Farrow regarding a dark conspiracy theory that had been spreading within the Trump White House, I was struck by two things:  1) the innocuousness of the memo in question, and 2) how the basis of the memo was plainly true.  The piece, in fact, goes a long way in substantiating the memo's contention about the media, allowing former Obama administration officials and their allies to offer ludicrous claims without even a scintilla of journalistic skepticism.

Lawrence O'Donnell
After Trump's "Worst Week" his approval plummets — I mean, barely changes.  The convictions of Paul Manafort and Michael Cohen had #TheResistance giddy with excitement.  This was the end.  He's a gonner.  WORST WEEK EVER. [...] The NBC/WSJ polls is almost exactly what Rasmussen finds as of August 24, 2018, 46% approval.  On August 24, 2010, Obama had a 45% approval rating according to Rasmussen.  So despite a massively negative media environment for Trump and a massively positive media environment for Obama, Trump's approval rating is the same as Obama at a similar time in his presidency.


Liberal media's desperate push for Trump impeachment may actually hurt Democrats.  The liberal news media have a new favorite word to use when discussing President Trump:  impeachment.  For example, MSNBC and CNN reporters, anchors and guests said "impeach," "impeachment" or some other form of the word on the cable news channels an incredible 222 times between 6 a.m. and 11:59 p.m.  Wednesday [8/22/2018].  And of course, they talked about possible impeachment other days as well, and newspapers and websites were also filled with impeachment speculation.  Most Democrats in Congress and their leaders are shying away from talking about impeachment before the November midterm elections — but that's not stopping the anti-Trump media.

All the Talk About Impeaching the President Is Nonsense.  The television-news media desperately need to fill twenty-four hours every day in order to sell advertising to support their stations, their management, their employees, and their negotiated settlements and non-disclosure-agreement pay-outs to women whom they must silence after one or another of their male employees has violated them. [...] So the television-news media have to keep the money pouring in.  Same with the print media.  They need to grab your attention and hold it all day and night, every day. [...] So they have to figure out how to keep the ratings up.  They love a murder — oh, how they love a murder!  Especially of a young pretty White girl.  That grabs the attention of everyone:  men, women, liberals, conservatives, young, and old. [...] Even an isolated unsolved murder of a single young White woman gets the media exercised into a frenzy:  Jonbenet Ramsey, Elizabeth Short, Chandra Levy, Kate Steinle, Mollie Tibbets.  The Seedier Media obsess over these individual murders round-the-clock until it emerges that the murderer was an illegal alien.

Summertime and the media are embarrassing — from hating America to loving Antifa.  In the space of one week, the press downplayed a Democrat governor saying America "was never that great" and watched as the governor's brother/CNN anchor defended Antifa.  Another CNN commentator bashed America and mocked a conservative while she told of the discrimination her disabled son faced.  And former CIA director John Brennan, now an NBC national security analyst, recanted his claim that President Donald Trump committed treason and spent the week whining about losing his security clearance.

CNN's Philip Mudd Tells Paris Dennard to 'Get Out' for Telling the Truth.  CNN counterterrorism analyst Philip Mudd exploded at conservative CNN contributor Paris Dennard on Friday evening when Dennard made the completely factual claim that former government officials with security clearance can land top D.C. jobs.  Mudd and Dennard were debating on Anderson Cooper 360°, guest-hosted by Jim Sciutto, over the question of whether President Donald Trump had been right to revoke the security clearance of former Central Intelligence Agency director John Brennan.

Newsroom commando Ralph Peters cashiers [him]self.  This weekend, retired lieutenant colonel Ralph Peters went on CNN's dubiously titled Reliable Sources and, in the presence of the show's serially unreliable host, Brian Stelter, and all those unfortunate souls in airport waiting areas across the nation being force-fed this liberal Sunday-morning drivel, cashiered himself.  It appears that fulminating Trump Derangement Syndrome brought this former Fox News military analyst to perform this sad ceremony. [...] As a combat veteran, which Peters is not, I have to wonder if this sneering, whiny-voiced news show commando has a clue as to how many millions of his military family he has just branded as destructive, vengeful, racist couch-potato anarchists, followers of a false messiah and derelict in our oaths to the Constitution.  It is a fact that a substantial majority of military personnel, whether active-duty, retirees, or veterans, are conservative in their politics, so Peters had to know he was spitting in the faces of millions of his former comrades.

Enemies of the People.  [T]here is a certain equanimity that comes with realizing that so many of the daily crises are not crises at all, and that so much of the media screaming is like visiting an ice cream store — each day a different flavor, but all the same basic product ready to kill you if you don't control the portions, the frequency...

How Far Will the Left Go?  All the Way.  [Scroll down]  Each day brings a new outrage, a development enthusiastically promulgated by a brain-dead media that thinks a headline must contain the words "sparks outrage" or "comes under fire," to be newsworthy.  The foxes of anger and resentment have been set among the hens of political cohesion, and every day the squawking grows louder — as it will until that day comes when there are no more hens left to lay the eggs.

As the Swamp Turns.  It never ends, does it?  The daily cable-news soap opera installment.  A new crisis every day.  Sex.  Money.  Secret tapes.  A stripper whose upper torso gives new meaning to the term Silicon Valley.  And then her media-frenzied lawyer steeped in his own fun-to-watch divorce.  Bring out the popcorn.  Pull out some Raisinets.  Refill the Coke and Pepsi.  Sneak in a few plastic straws.  Another day's episode of "As the Swamp Turns."  Children separated from their parents.  Parents sent back with their children — and then telling the authorities:  "Naah, we'll go back, but leave the kids separated here."  Kids who do not even belong to the parents.  Russians — even red-headed Reds.  Secret courts.  Spies.  Married paramours exchanging mysterious messages:  "Andy."  "Secret plans."  An "Insurance Policy."  Smells at a Virginia Walmart.  Secret tape recordings.  The only thing missing is the "other woman" with the unwanted and hidden pregnancy, suddenly revealed — and the drama of whose baby it is.  Enter Bill Clinton!

The Conspiracy Theory That Ate New York.  This is the helpful illustration that New York Magazine published to help readers understand its convoluted — and, needless to say, #FakeNews — cover story alleging a Trump-Putin plot that began in... 1987.  Before the Soviet Union fell.  Before Putin had assumed any sort of true power.

What Critics Missed About the Trump-Putin Summit.  When Presidents Trump and Vladimir Putin ended their joint press conference in Helsinki, the punditocracy predictably swarmed all over it like ants around a pile of crumbs.  Was Trump winking at Putin?  Did he really say he believes Putin more than he believes Robert Mueller about whether Russia interfered in the 2016 election?  Former Gus Hall enthusiast John Brennan, off his meds again, tweeted that the presser was "treasonous."  Professional chatterer Anderson Cooper said it was "perhaps one of the most disgraceful performances by an American president at a summit."  Every phrase, every gesture of the event will be picked apart and second-guessed to death in the next few days.

The Jim Jordan Hit Job Implodes:  Ohio State Held Hearing on Reputed Sex Abuser in... 1997.  I did some research on the story alleging that our warrior patriot, Rep. Jim Jordan was aware that his wrestling team members were being molested and did nothing about it. [...] We all have the facts and know that Rep. Jordan is not guilty of this allegation.

How to Read the News:  A Guide for Truth-Seekers.  The recent MSM and celebrity hysteria about the illegal immigrant children being separated from their alleged parents would have had some impact with voters had not the truth been exposed in the Internet on unbiased websites and twitter posts.  Those pictures of immigrant children sleeping in cages brought tears (crocodile?) to MSNBC anchor Rachel Maddow, who apparently failed to note that these heartbreaking photos were taken in 2014 during the Obama administration.  The detention center used by the Trump administration was a far cry from Obama's if one viewed them on one of the more credible news sites like Breitbart.com.

The Zombie Media.  Journalism schools do not teach journalism anymore.  They teach persuasive storytelling.  They teach the Machiavellian black art of propaganda.  Like most black arts, left-wing "journalism" relies heavily on its own peculiar dogma of magical rites and incantations.  To shut down Herman Cain in 2012, our leftist adversaries invented (or at least exaggerated) the ever popular sex scandal — the trusted and true kill shot they have used to assassinate troublesome public figures for decades.  Republicans nailed by a weeping and well paid accuser have typically curled into the fetal position and faded away.

Chris Matthews Urges Communist Revolution to Stop Supreme Court.  So the Chris Matthews [plan] is for the Democrats to declare a Communist revolution, call in the Russians for help, start executing their own people for being insufficiently left-wing, go down to defeat, flee the country while kidnapping a bunch of children and stealing all the gold?  Actually I think that is their plan.

Journalists circulate conspiratorial claims against DHS Doc claiming it has Nazi code.  Multiple journalists circulated a conspiracy theory on Twitter that a document from the Department of Homeland Security contained a Nazi code Thursday [6/28/2018]. [...] The tweets reference a press release from DHS titled "We Must Secure The Border And Build The Wall To Make America Safe Again" and was released in February, garnering little attention until recently.

Ex-CNN producer blasts Jim Acosta for 'self-serving antics'.  A former CNN producer took to Twitter on Friday [6/29/2018] to blast Jim Acosta, the network's White House correspondent, for what he called Acosta's "self-serving antics," saying they "give all good journalists a bad name."  The posts by Steve Krakauer, a former senior digital producer for the network who is now is a top executive at Commerce House, a Dallas-based advertising firm, were prompted by a question that Acosta shouted to President Donald Trump on Friday [6/29/2018] during a White House event on the economy and tax cuts.

Immigration 'crisis' brought to you by the Media Matrix.  Starting a week ago Friday, the media discovered (surprise!) that the Trump White House is taking a hard line on illegal immigration — and the pharisees of CNN and MSNBC began dressing themselves in sackcloth and ashes to impress us with the sincerity of their shock and dismay at finding out that children coming across the border illegally are separated from the adults who accompanied them (not necessarily their parents).  Honestly, if you need a give-away (a "tell" as they say in poker) that the left-wing media is conspiring to damage this president, all you need to do is click back and forth between CNN and MSNBC for about three hours.  If every time you turn on one of these channels they are parroting the same story back at you with different talking heads pouring ashes on each other and cursing Trump, then you know you are in the middle of a feeding frenzy.

Delusion About Detentions:  On Family Separation at the Border.  Upstanding journalists, their fellow right-minded pundits, and progressive elected official friends are outraged!  According to them, the Trump Administration's approach to immigration enforcement is cruel, un-American, inhumane, barbaric, and even medically dangerous. [...] The problem is the facts are at odds with the conventional media interpretation of existing legal precedent, prior administrations' practices, and even relevant federal statutes.  You know, the law.  But being wrong on the facts has never stopped the media and their useful idiots in the commentariat from maligning the Trump Administration unfairly to suit their agenda.  Now they're shrieking about "baby jails."  It's insane.

News Fatigue?  Join the Club.  A Pew Research study recently found that nearly 7 in 10 Americans suffer from "news fatigue" — a phenomenon even more pervasive among Republicans.  The survey focused on the volume as much as the quality of the offerings.  But why wouldn't the public be emotionally expended from the anger and accusations, bullying and backbiting, "fake news" and "fact checks," insults and innuendo, posturing and protests, threats and trolling, and virtue-signaling and violent rhetoric and imagery spewed from every direction today?

The Editor says...
Whenever a big furor suddenly and simultaneously appears on every television "news" channel, there's a reason for it.  It is almost always a manufactured crisis designed to displace some other story.  The "anchor baby prison" and "kids in cages" hype is a false description of conditions that are nothing new.  The same laws and policies have been in place for months and years.  The reason all this is now front and center is that Donald Trump's popularity is steadily increasing — now surpassing that of Barack H. Obama — and it appears that he is about to single-handedly end the Korean War.  That is an accomplishment that must not be allowed to stay in the hourly news cycle if the news media's preferred party is to have any power.

Desperately Seeking Supremacists.  Talia Lavin is (or was, at last word) a fact-checker for the New Yorker.  She achieved overnight Twitter-fame by accusing an ICE agent of being a white supremacist. [...] Part of the story, I think, is that the Left is hard up for white supremacists.  Liberals talk about them all the time, but to the best of my knowledge, I have never met one.  Have you?  Liberals need to come up with someone other than Richard Spencer; hence the eagerness to libel a heroic ICE employee.

Update:
New Yorker staffer resigns after falsely accusing ICE agent of having Nazi tattoo.  The fact-checker for the New Yorker who mistook a Marine veteran's tattoo for a Nazi symbol has resigned, saying the "small mistake" has ruined her life.  Talia Lavin is out of a job following her June 18 tweet that caused mass outrage.  "I feel like I made a small mistake and it's destroyed my life," she told New York Magazine's The Cut.  Lavin's since-deleted tweet was about Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent Justin Gaertner, whom she falsely accused of having a tattoo of the Nazis' Iron Cross.

Drive-By Media Bombarding Americans With 'Manufactured Crises' to Distract from IG Report, Robust Economy.  The liberal media has been manufacturing crises ad-infinitum to divert the public's attention away from the Trump administration's tremendous achievements and the Democratic establishment's corruption, conservative radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh warns.

The Astonishing Silliness of CNN.  The good people at CNN can do what they want, but this blatant chyron-splaining sends a rather clear and unfortunate message:  that they think their audience is daft and incapable of figuring things out for themselves.  CNN is frequently breathless when no one should be breathless, which would be kind of exhausting, if anyone cared.  Take this headline from the network's website this week:  "The 45 Most Astonishing Lines from Donald Trump's Nashville Speech."

Lost Children?  Detention Cages?  Baby Prison Bus?  Trump's Critics Will Believe Anything.  Over the long weekend, President Trump's critics were in a sputtering rage over his supposedly losing 1,500 illegal immigrant children, sticking them in cages, and putting others on specially equipped prison buses.  Turns out, it was all 100% bogus.

Mainstream Media's Credibility Problem Is Of Their Own Making.  So, not only are the mainstream media biased, they're also incompetent.  Headlines and scandalous snippets that the news shows can flash on chyrons trump facts, and they are what is important to the mainstream media.  They eschew fact checking in favor of sensational headlines.  They create salacious news narratives, meant not to inform but to sell advertising.

The Firesign Theater Media.  The "mainstream media" (CNN, MSNBC, the three networks, the major newspapers, et al.) are so consumed by Trump hysteria that it places them squarely in this Firesign Theater zone.  Nicholas Kristof and his wife talk about the president in bed.  Brian Stelter describes himself as "Trump addicted."  Any psychiatrist can tell you that monomaniacal, pathological hatred has its surreal aspects.  Trump as the great white (orange?) whale and the media as Captain Ahab.  MSNBC's exegesis of the importance of the Mueller investigation in its various guises is a good example of this "Credo quia absurdum" (I believe because it is absurd) approach.  Rachel Maddow, Stephanie Ruhle, and Chris Hayes constantly strain to outdo themselves with conspiracy theories.  One would think there were more Russians involved with the Trump campaign than populate the pages of War and Peace.  More entertaining are the nightly shouting matches on Don Lemon's CNN show.

Mueller Year One:  The Real Heroes in Journalism.  CNN won an award for its January 2017 report about President-elect Trump being briefed on the bogus Steele dossier.  While we now know the story was improperly leaked by former Director of National Intelligence (and virulent Trump foe) James Clapper to shotgun the Trump-Russia collusion plotline days before the inauguration — and the celebrated CNN reporters did little more than regurgitate talking points spoon-fed to them by political operatives (one is known to have close ties to Fusion GPS) — the network was applauded for its "depth of reporting."

Estimate:  Cable News Nets Have Given Michael Avenatti $175 Million Worth Of Airtime.  [Scroll down]  Another thing:  He's doing it with no help from Fox.  If I'm not mistaken, the only FNC show he's been on is Shannon Bream's in March.  He was, allegedly, scheduled on Martha MacCallum's show recently but canceled at the last minute.  Tucker Carlson invited him on but Avenatti told his producer that he only wants to do Hannity's show, an obviously deliberate slight to Carlson.  (Or is it a compliment, with Avenatti suspecting he'd have a harder time outmaneuvering Tucker in an interview?)  Whether he's avoiding Fox because he's wary of the hostile reception he'd get there or because he's building a brand as a #Resistance hero and wants viewers to identify him with anti-Trump CNN and MSNBC, the fact remains that he's somehow achieved cable ubiquity without any exposure on the most highly rated cable news network in the country.

Court Documents Show Porn Star Lawyer Reported $8 Million Windfall in Feb.  When he Took on Stormy.  The Michael Avenatti Files — How did a bankrupt attorney come across $8 million after picking up porn star client Stormy Daniels?  Porn star lawyer Michael Avenatti is a huge hit with the Democrat-media complex.  The attorney for porn star Stormy Daniels has held 108 interviews on cable news outlets MSNBC and CNN since March 7th.

2018: When Orwell's 1984 Stopped Being Fiction.  When I trained as a journalist, we reserved a "Revealed" or an "Exposed" for those special occasions when we were able to bring to the reader information those in power did not want known.  These were the rare moments when as journalists we could hold our heads high and claim to be monitoring the centres of power, to be fulfilling our sacred duty as the fourth estate.  But today's Guardian's "exclusive" story "Revealed:  UK's push to strengthen anti-Russia alliance" is doing none of this.  Nothing the powerful would want hidden from us is being "revealed". No one had to seek out classified documents or speak to a whistleblower to bring us this "revelation".  Everyone in this story — the journalist Patrick Wintour, an anonymous "Whitehall official", and the named politicians and think-tank wonks — is safely in the same self-congratulatory club, promoting a barely veiled government policy: to renew the Cold War against Russia.

CNN Hosts Porn Star's Lawyer Michael Avenatti 59 Times in Less Than Two Months.  CNN has exhibited a fetish for the Stormy Daniels story, particularly for her Trump-smacking lawyer, Michael Avenatti.  In less than two months (from March 7 to April 30), Avenatti has been a guest on CNN a total of 59 times — an average of more than once per day.  MRC analysts combed through transcripts of all of CNN's 2018 coverage looking for references to interviews with Avenatti, and then double-checked using our video archive.  Since Avenatti's first appearance on March 7, he has been interviewed on CNN a whopping 59 times, more than one-third of which (19) were with Anderson Cooper — who, of course, interviewed Stormy Daniels on CBS's 60 Minutes back in March.

Black Coffee:  The Starbucks Story Is Trash.  This is a country of 325-million people.  If two guys getting tossed out of a coffee shop is news, then things in Donald Trump's America must be going [very] well.  But if the story were only meaningless trash, it would just be typical of American journalism.  But it's pernicious trash meant to advance a false left-wing narrative, which is — oh yeah! — typical of American journalism.

CNN's dicey interview with student on lockdown after Maryland school shooting.  CNN engaged a student to pass along casualty stats from a school shooting, even though the student himself made clear that his own familiarity with the details was limited.  And then, when police showed up to escort him and his classmates from the school, CNN asked him to stay on the line, presumably to get a guided audio tour of the aftermath.

A User's Guide To Media Coverage Of Political Protests.  Liberal protests are newsworthy because they're disruptive; conservative protests are too orderly to be worth discussing.  The news angle with the gun protests was the disobedience involved in walking out, something to be celebrated.  Leftist protests demand police activity because leftists break stuff, and they demand to be arrested because it somehow makes them heroic.  One hundred thousand conservatives could show up on the National Mall in our nation's capital and not leave behind so much as a candy wrapper on the ground.  Bo-ring.

The 'scandal' of Perla Morales-Luna's arrest is fake news.  The arrest of Perla Morales-Luna on March 3 in San Diego is an absolute nonscandal.  Yes, at first glance the video looks a little concerning.  It shows a mother being separated from her screaming family as Customs and Border Patrol officers struggle to put her in the back of a vehicle.  But only at first glance.  Because if you watch again you'll see that the CBP officers use proportionate force and good efficiency in getting Morales-Luna off the street and into custody.  That's the best way to ensure no one is harmed and the situation isn't escalated unnecessarily.  Moreover, the CBP wasn't simply detaining Morales-Luna because she was just a random illegal immigrant.

Nikolas Cruz Is the Result of 'It Takes a Village'.  Does everyone see what the Democrats have done?  They've pitted children against us, thereby mainstreaming and normalizing child exploitation.  What the Democrats did to Parkland student Emma Gonzalez was as sickening a display as any I've ever witnessed.  They coaxed an understandably distraught child to spew one debunked Democrat lie after another — and, of course, plenty of invective toward President Trump.  David Hogg, a 17-year-old Parkland student, asked on CNN:  "If you can't get elected without taking money from child murderers, why are you running?"  Normal question from a 17-year-old, right?  Wondering aloud if he came up with that question all on his own, with such emotionally vivid lingual sophistication and political acumen, must make me a grumpy old gun nut who thinks our youth are stupid.

The Portraits and the Obama Reality Distortion Field.  [T]he Obamas are the center of the most delusional cult of personality that the media has yet spawned. [...] This isn't journalism.  It's not a free press.  It's a bunch of cult members rushing out to explain that the flawed thing is flawless.  You're the flawed one for not seeing its gloriousness.  All hail the beloved leader.

Joe Concha:  Media's Trump Anger Mostly 'Performance Art at This Point'.  After it was made public that President Trump had requested the Pentagon to plan a military parade through Washington, DC, there was a steady stream of forceful condemnation of the President in which they claimed he was imitating foreign dictators.  And in an appearance on Fox News' Tucker Carlson Tonight Thursday [2/8/2018], Hill media reporter Joe Concha knocked them for playing up their outrage and playing to an audience.

CNN: Undetected Asteroids Could Threaten Earth During Government Shutdown.  Two CNN correspondents claimed during an episode of The Lead with Jake Tapper that an asteroid could potentially threaten the Earth if the government shutdown continues.  CNN correspondent Tom Foreman recalled the time NASA could not monitor "potentially dangerous asteroids" for over two weeks, implying that NASA would not be able to prevent an asteroid attack if it hit Earth while the government shut down.

TV crew busted trying to sneak fake bomb into airport.  Seven members of a cable TV crew were arrested at Newark Airport on Thursday [1/18/2018] after trying to film themselves passing a fake explosive device through a security checkpoint and onto a plane, according to reports.  The crew was working for the cable network CNBC, according to nj.com.  The fake explosive device was in a carry-on bag and never made it past security, Transportation Security Administration spokesman Michael McCarthy said.  "They failed, were caught and were arrested on multiple charges," he said, without elaborating on the charges.

CNN's Sanjay Gupta Diagnoses Donald Trump With Heart Disease.  Wednesday [1/17/2018] on CNN's "New Day," Dr. Sanjay Gupta, the network's chief medical correspondent, proclaimed that based on President Donald Trump's coronary calcium scores going back to the previous decade, Trump has heart disease.  Gupta's diagnosis came a day after Trump's doctor, Navy Rear Adm. Dr. Ronny Jackson, offered his assessment of Trump's health at a White House press briefing.

Armchair diagnosis of a patient he has never examined:
Sanjay Gupta:  By all standards, Trump has heart disease.  CNN's chief medical correspondent, Dr. Sanjay Gupta, said Wednesday that he believes tests reveal that President Trump has heart disease.  Gupta said dating back to 2009, Trump started to have "these tests that are actually looking for the presence of calcium in the blood vessels that lead to the heart."  "Steadily, up until just this past week when he had it performed again, those numbers have gone up," he said.  "When they get to a certain range ... that means he has heart disease."

Leftist Toilet Mouths Condemn Trump as They Corrupt Nation.  President Trump denies having used a vulgar term last Thursday [1/11/2018] to describe dysfunctional Third World countries.  Yet there's no denying that the leftist media, believing he did, responded by repeatedly disgorging the term in a childish orgy of decadence.  Of course, the media no doubt think they're damaging Trump — but they're actually damaging society.  Let's be clear:  Leftists certainly object to the substance of Trump's comments, that we shouldn't continually absorb poor, unskilled, often functionally illiterate and unassimilable people from Third World nations.  But they also object to his alleged style, labeling as obscene the use of s-hole (toilet) to describe such places.  So to show us how bad such language is, the Crude News Network (CNN), for example, used it at least 36 times on Thursday.  It's sort of like inveighing against animal abuse and then bludgeoning dozens of dogs to death on air to prove your point.

CNN Leaps Into The Toilet:  Network Aired 195 Uses of 'S***hole' on Friday.  In the contest for Most Offended News Network after President Trump reportedly referred to African nations as "s***hole" countries, CNN wins hands down.  NewsBusters staff combed through CNN transcripts on Nexis for the S-hole word in the 24 hours of January 12 — the first full day after The Washington Post reported the controversy — and found CNN staffers and CNN guests uncorked the profanity 195 times in one day.  That doesn't count Saturday, Sunday or Monday.  They could be headed for 1,000 by now.  It also doesn't count the amount of time they put the S-word on screen (sometimes twice, as you can see on Cuomo's temporary prime time show.)  Compare that to Fox News Channel.  Their curse count was zero.  FNC told staff and guests not to say it.

Revealed:  Trump guzzles Diet Coke.  [Scroll down]  If not for Fox News we'd be totally in the dark, about everything, and it was from there that I first heard about CNN's alarming report:  [Something important?]  No, not exactly.  Rather, it's been reported, first from The New York Times, that Trump likes Diet Coke.  Wait — it gets worse.  He guzzles down a dozen a day.  So given such a scoop, CNN could not resist breaking it at around the same time that [a terrorist attack] was going on at Port Authority.  New Yorkers were running for their lives... but first things first; Trump is a glutton for Diet Coke

What Were the Motives of the Port Authority Bomber?  What were the motives of Ayaked Ullah, the Port Authority bomber in yesterday's attack?  There are many news headlines that address the issue, and they advance differing theories, each of them presented as fact.

CNN Promotes 'White Nonsense Roundup:' White Liberals Who Save Victimized People Of Color On Social Media.  In a piece titled "These are your white allies on Facebook," CNN enthusiastically introduces us to a group called "White Nonsense Roundup" (WNR).  Essentially, the group of roughly 100 "white ally" volunteers take turns swooping in to save African American people (already suffering from the "emotional labor" of systemic racism) from social media arguments when issues of race arise.  You know, because these white liberals are "woke" enough to recognize their inherent sin of whiteness and, apparently along with CNN, think people of color need white people to fight their social media battles for them.

New York Times forced to heavily amend another supposed K.T. McFarland 'scoop'.  The New York Times got ahead of itself again with yet another supposedly hot scoop involving former deputy national security adviser K.T. McFarland, the Russians and the 2016 presidential election.  The story, now titled "McFarland's Testimony About Russia Contacts Is Questioned," reported originally that an email sent by the former Trump transition official indicated she lied to Congress this summer when she was questioned about disgraced Gen. Michael Flynn's communications with the Russians.  The article has been heavily amended since publication so that it is now mostly innuendo.  The initial references to the emails have been removed, and the story now leans mostly on Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., who only questions whether McFarland was forthright in her testimony.

How D.C. political assassins use media to oust Rex Tillerson.  If several major media outlets are to be believed, at least two senior administration officials say Chief of Staff John Kelly has drawn up a plan to replace Tillerson with CIA Director Mike Pompeo, who would be replaced by Sen. Tom Cotton by year's end or soon after.  The Washington media lap up these anonymous leaks like starving kittens.  Personnel contests, like shallow election horse race stories, are easy to do, appear to contain drama and inside info and elevate the reporter to someone-in-the-know.  The fundamental problem with these self-serving reports is the sources are unknown, so news consumers cannot judge their trustworthiness and motivations.  Which, of course, is the point of hiding their identities.  Consumers must trust the reporters and media outlets, a dubious act in this era of rampant Trump antipathy.  The New York Times started this latest Tillerson-is-a-goner meme.

Unhinged coverage of Trump is hurting the media.  Not only is everything (still) hyper-politicized, but the lines between news media, lifestyle media and flat-out activism have faded into irrelevance.  On Wednesday [11/22/2017], the lead story in Teen Vogue, next to stories about how "I Will Never Use Regular Soap Again After THIS $6 Foam Body Wash" and "Everyone Basically Wore Lingerie to the VS Fashion Show After Party," was this screaming headline:  "The United States Voted 'No' on an Anti-Nazi UN Resolution."  It ran over a terrifying picture of crowds carrying banners, some featuring swastikas, with smoke in the background suggesting a terror attack.  Only when you click through do you discover that there is no news here whatsoever:  The US votes against this meaningless, nonbinding UN gambit every year because the US has this thing called the First Amendment.  President Obama's appointees also opposed the resolution.

A Year to be Thankful For.  I'm thankful my fears about Donald Trump seem to have been unfounded.  Not a fascist.  Not a secret liberal.  Not an incompetent.  ISIS is defeated.  GDP at 3% plus.  Some 60 great originalist judges nominated.  Regulations cut back at an amazing rate.  Our lying leftist press humiliated and discredited.  I'm thankful because, whenever I get tired of watching an America in crisis, all I have to do is turn off the mainstream news and America is not in crisis anymore.  In fact, America is doing quite well.

Whittle: The News Media Knows How To Stop These Massacres, But Refuses To Do It.  In his latest video, conservative commentator Bill Whittle discusses the most effective way to end the surge of mass murders that America has suffered in the last twenty years — and it's one that falls squarely at the feet of the national news media.  Citing forensic psychologist Park Dietz, who has studied mass murderers extensively, Whittle contends that we've seen a wave of mass shootings like Las Vegas and Sutherland Springs because the media insists on providing 24/7 coverage of the tragedies, turning suicide massacres into a chance for glory for the sociopaths carrying out the heinous acts.

The Puerto Rican Genocide That Wasn't.  The death toll in Puerto Rico currently stands at 48.  Hurricane Maria made landfall in Puerto Rico on September 20.  As we approach October 20, the death toll from the hurricane is a lot less than the death toll from the deadliest month in Chicago.  Despite media arm waving, with only 117 people not accounted for, the actual death toll in Puerto Rico isn't likely to rise very much.  And even a death toll of 48 was only achieved by listing people who died of heart attacks and other medical problems that could not be treated because of hurricane damage.  It's unknown whether some of them might have lived without the hurricane.  It's guesswork.  The previous, incomplete death toll showed that the actual hurricane seemed to have only killed 19 people.  2 suicides were also attributed to the hurricane.  As were respiratory failures "indirectly linked" to the hurricane.  But the media has been working hard to inflate the death toll.  "We'll probably never know exactly how many people died," the Washington Post speculates.  "Hurricane Maria likely killed more people than Puerto Rico says," the Daily News ghoulishly insists.

No, Mr. Krugman, There is Not a Cholera Outbreak in Puerto Rico.  Yesterday [9/30/2-17], liberal pundit and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman incorrectly tweeted that cholera, a deadly bacterial disease caused by unsanitary water, had resurfaced in Puerto Rico. [...] Then moments later, he corrected himself with a follow up tweet. [...] You will notice his fake news has amassed thousands of retweets and favorites, while his correction has not.

Hurricane Irma And How The Left Has Politicized Even The Weather.  A number of years ago, I sat down with the general manager of a major television news station.  He told me that in their own survey, viewers tuned in for "weather first, sports second, and news last."  Therefore he stressed, weather forecasters were the "cash cow" of the station.  He further explained that much of television weather forecasting was a "sham."  He said that decades ago, they would give a "one-day" forecast.  But then Station B across town went to a "two-day" forecast.  So then they countered with a "three-day" forecast," until everyone went to the "useless seven-day" forecasts.  He emphasized that it was all done for reasons of competition and ratings and that with a "seven-day" forecast, the station and the networks were playing viewers for "fools," because they normally "couldn't even get the forecast for tomorrow correct."

While People Die, Washington Post Obsesses Over Melania Trump's Shoes.  Searching for a scandal the way a crackhead hunts for crack, the media decided that the real story of the natural disaster ought to be Melania Trump's shoes.  Because that is what the media is now.  Melania Trump wore high heels while getting on Air Force One.  The media howled that she was heading to a flood zone while wearing high heels.  Never mind that she was still far from the zone and was just boarding a plane.  Then she landed in Texas, wearing sneakers.  And that was also bad.

Between alt-right and 'antifa,' media still manages to be worse.  The only people dumber than the Neanderthals and Brass Knuckle Draggers are the insufferably tedious referees known as the Stupid Media who shape the country as a barking mad carnival, whipping up hysteria for every armed showdown.

CBS News joins O.J. Simpson on the hunt for the real killers.  In the wake of O.J. Simpson's parole last week, CBS News has a story today titled "Who killed Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman?" Curiously, the story doesn't attempt to answer that question.  Instead, the entire premise of the story is that the investigation into the murders is officially still open in Los Angeles.

Worst media moments of the week:  NY Mag climate screed wins!  [Scroll down]  "There are now, trapped in Arctic ice, diseases that have not circulated in the air for millions of years," goes one of the milder passages.  It was so bad that climate alarmist and hockey stick creator Michael Mann teamed up with two others to write a response, arguing, "Doomsday scenarios are as harmful as climate change denial."  Mann and his compatriots criticized the New York Mag piece as painting, "an overly bleak picture, arguing that climate change could render the Earth uninhabitable by the end of this century."  They also called it out for errors.  Mann made an interesting comment that seems to go right over the head of eco-journalists, explaining, "fear does not motivate, and appealing to it is often counter-productive."  Yet fear is about 99.99 percent of all media climate catastrophe coverage.

"The more it sensationalizes the commonplace, the more boring its coverage becomes."
The Media's Endless Anti-Trump Show Trial.  It is a measure of the anti-Trump media's stupidity and malpractice that the phrase "breaking news" now elicits eye rolls.  The media's "breaking news" about Trump is rarely breaking or news.  It is usually recycled and old — some stale piece of information, relating to a practice both parties long ago adopted, that is sensationalized and dished up as novel.  Into this category falls much of its breathless "Trump-Russia" coverage, including its all-hands-on-deck stories about Donald Trump Jr.

The media's mass hysteria over 'collusion' is out of control.  Hysteria among the media and Trump opponents over the prospect of "collusion" between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin may have hit its crescendo this week.  That's right:  The wailing from the media and their allies about Donald Trump Jr.'s meeting with some "Kremlin-connected Russian lawyer" (whatever that means) may be the last gasp of this faux scandal.  Good riddance.  Predictably, the New York Times started the ball rolling with front-page coverage, going so far as to argue, "The accounts of the meeting represent the first public indication that at least some in the campaign were willing to accept Russian help."  As if this were some breakthrough moment.  The Times followed up with a headline yesterday [7/10/2017] that the meeting request and subject matter discussed in the prior story were transmitted to Trump Jr. via an email. [...] The Times is so desperate to move the story that the meeting's arrangement over email is being made into Page 1 news.

What counts as treason differs depending on the letter after your name.  In 2012, Obama met with Russia and said he would be more flexible if he was re-elected.  The media and Democrats had no problem.  There were no investigations and no spying on Obama looking for collusion.  The Clintons, the Clinton Foundation, and their close associates got huge amounts of money from foreign governments including Russia.  In return, Russia got uranium, some of which it transferred to Iran.  There were no investigations by the FBI; Democrats and the media didn't care.  Kickbacks for uranium to the enemy looks like actual treason. [...] But Donald Jr. had a ten-minute meeting where he thought he might get dirt on Hillary in which he got nothing and gave nothing in return, and he and his father are essentially accused of treason.

Byron York:  Trump-Russia investigation takes sharp turn toward the dumb.  What a mess for the White House.  And all for nothing.  When the meeting actually happened, at Trump Tower on June 9, there was a reason Jared Kushner left after a few minutes and Paul Manafort spent the whole time staring at his phone.  The "Crown prosecutor" of Russia — there is no such position — was actually a shady lawyer, Natalia Veselnitskaya, who had no "official documents" to offer but wanted to harangue Trump Jr. about U.S. sanctions on Russia.  Trump Jr. quite reasonably saw there was nothing there and cut the meeting off after about 20 minutes.  But in a capital consumed with Trump and Russia, the revelations, first reported in the New York Times and then substantiated by Trump Jr. himself, blew up into the Scandal That Ate Cable TV.

Some subways are literally held together with zip ties.  At more than $1 million per subway car, you'd think they'd be held together with something more than zip ties. [...] An MTA spokeswoman said Wednesday that the zip tie was being used as a temporary fastener to attach a cable to the new R186 cars while a special part is being made.  She added that the cable is attached another way, and the zip tie is just a back-up.

The Editor says...
The article immediately above, as you can see from the two sentences excerpted above, is an example of self-contradictory sensationalism.

NYT's Latest Trump Story Follows A Familiar Pattern Of Breathlessly Reporting Routine Procedures.  The establishment media's hysteria is once again in high gear after news that members of the Trump transition team were ordered to preserve documents and other materials pertinent to the investigation into Russian interference of the election.  Trump's transition team's counsel, issuing a memo to satisfy routine requirements in any investigation, hardly called for the tone and seriousness with which it was reported.  The New York Times asserts that the request "illustrated the seriousness of the inquiry" conducted by special counsel Robert Mueller, and how "deeply they are delving" into President Donald Trump's activities.  Such rhetoric follows a longstanding pattern of the establishment media's propensity to overreact to even the most routine circumstances with anything related to the president.  The Washington Post's Tom Nichols says that media personnel "seem determined to overreact on even ordinary matters."

Winners and Losers from Comey Hearing.  Mainstream media cable networks like CNN had countdown clocks.  Broadcast networks covered the hearing as if it would go down as one of the most seminal events in the history of the country.  "Never Trump" Republicans were getting ready to be used as the mainstream media's useful idiots and get their predictable television hits and quotes in mainstream media publications.  Left-wing Democrats were dreaming of drafting articles of impeachment.  They lionized Comey as their hero who would help them destroy Trump once and for all.  Not so fast.

I think they do this intentionally.
Grrr 59% say news media make them angry, dissatisfied.  Nearly six in 10 Americans are upset with the news media, claiming in a new poll that it makes them angry and dissatisfied.

CNN Goes Bonkers:  Spends 10 Hours on Comey Before a Single Word of Testimony.  Former FBI Director James Comey has not said a single word in public, but the liberal media have been salivating for days over his upcoming testimony on Thursday.  Case in point:  from noon on Thursday (June 1) when the date for the testimony was set, until noon today (June 7), CNN has already devoted more than 10 hours of coverage to testimony that has yet to even occur.

The Media Is Now Leaking Classified Info Just Because They Feel Like It.  This morning, The New York Times brought us another breathtaking exposé of classified national security information that is really important for the public to know because... um, well, because they just kind of felt like it.  The story is about a contractor for an international shipping company who was captured and held hostage by rebels in Yemen before being released last year.  Without the man's permission or cooperation, The New York Times gives details of his capture and imprisonment, his name, his age, his exact job description with the shipping company, and the location where his wife and children lived at the time (none of which I will repeat here). [...] The whole report is inexplicable, and you get the sense that the reporters just wanted to tell a splashy, thriller-like story.  Except that there's a larger pattern:  it has become acceptable to open the floodgates of classified information because Trump.

The News Is Propaganda.  Non-stop distractions are deliberately used by those in power as instruments of policy for the purpose of preventing people from paying attention to reality.  Propaganda is used by those in power to manipulate language, thought, and opinion in a way that causes the progression from thought to action artificially.  When the public is reduced to a state where people no longer care about the truth and are unaware of what that truth even is, propaganda takes hold and shows them what to do. [...] Under the conditions in which we find ourselves living crisis to crisis, there can be no thought as the steady stream of propaganda is fed to us in the form of "news" that never strays from a certain narrative.

The Anonymous Sources Of Washington Post And CNN Fake News.  Media fake news is everywhere.  No, the new health care bill does not treat rape as a pre-existing condition and Republicans did not celebrate its passage with beer.  The latest media outrage is driven by a Washington Post story about intelligence disclosures based on claims by anonymous sources.  The Post's big hit pieces are mainly based on anonymous sources.  Its latest hit piece runs a quote from, "a former senior U.S. official who is close to current administration officials."  That's an anonymous source quoting hearsay from other anonymous sources.  This isn't journalism.  It's a joke.

Anonymous Nation:  America's Papers of Record Have Turned into Tabloids.  Donald Trump made a name for himself in part by regularly appearing on the cover of New York City tabloids in the 1980s and 1990s.  Fast forward to 2017, and the guy is now president, still appearing on the cover of various grocery store check-out scandal sheets — like the New York Times and the Washington Post.  Journalists from these institutions conduct their reporting like they're covering Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie's divorce.

Hysteria, overblown hooey part of the fake news cycle.  Turns out Mr. Trump is a germaphobe and wasn't in that Russian hotel room.  The bust of Martin Luther King is still in the Oval Office.  He didn't abandon conservatives by naming his sister to the Supreme Court.  Mr. Trump's Tower — and people involved in his campaign — were, in fact, surveilled.  Slowly, agonizingly, Truth becomes very inconvenient for all these people predicting Mr. Trump's certain demise.  In the end, they are all left clinging to the smallest Styrofoam shard of their original story, bobbing in the harsh sea of Donald Trump Derangement Syndrome.

How many buzzwords can the liberal media write in one sentence?  I was reading a very poorly written Los Angeles Times article about North Carolina legislators introducing a bill to define marriage as between a man and a woman, and I was surprised to read the following sentence:  ["]Opponents of the legislation castigated it as an unnecessary step that will stoke division in a state still reeling from the fallout of a controversial bill regulating which bathrooms transgender people can use.["]  I have rarely seen a sentence so sensationalistically, so chock-full of so many liberal buzzwords.  The over-dramatization of facts makes this news article read like an action thriller.

Trump's Budget is an Attack On the Bureaucratic State.  So according to journalists, Donald Trump's proposed budget cuts are "big," "deep," "dramatic," "massive," and so on.  With each breathless adjective — often coupled with excellent verbs like "gut" and "slash" — they add to the apocalypticism that's engulfed the Left.  "Reading through the Trump budget," tweeted The New York Times' Nicholas Kristof, "I feel as the Romans must have felt in 456 AD as the barbarians conquered and ushered in the dark ages."  Vox claimed that the budget plan is a proposal to "dramatically remake the federal government."  If only.  In perspective, all of this melodrama is over probably less than 1 percent of the national budget.

Fake News Frenzy — Remember the Great Black Church Burning Hoax?  The recent "fake news" about bomb threats at Jewish Community Centers and desecration of Jewish cemeteries recalls a much earlier chapter in the history of Fake News — the Black Church Burnings of the 1990s.  Bomb threats phoned in to Jewish Community Centers across the country caused a spasm of "Trump is not denouncing these fast enough" tweets.  At around the same time, there were multiple cases of reported desecration of Jewish cemeteries, including the toppling of tombstones.  All this was presumed to be part of an imagined Trump Effect: [...] When Trump suggested that some of these might be typical Hate Hoaxes, he was denounced for that, too.  Well, it turned out that many bomb threats could be traced to one black disgruntled reporter (Juan Thompson) who was attempting to lay the blame on his white girlfriend.

ICE Calls Out CNN, NBC, Etc., For "False, Dangerous & Irresponsible" Fake News Reporting.  President Trump told a gathering of news media yesterday, namely the Mainstream Media that is not accustomed to having its status questioned, that they were constantly perpetrating fakes news to create an intended reaction from the American people.  ICE, the nation's largest immigration enforcement agency, just did the very same thing, calling out the media for its fabricated/highly slanted coverage of recent immigration raids and reminding everyone that under previous administration these raids were far more numerous — and the media then said NOTHING.

ICE: Raid reports fake news, Obama grabbed 350% more.  U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is pushing back hard on media reports that President Trump has unleashed a mean-spirited national raid on immigrants, noting that it rounded up over 350 percent more during one sweep under former President Obama.  In a series of tweets, ICE called the reports, in the Washington Post and elsewhere, "dangerous and irresponsible."  The agency this week said that had made 683 arrests of mostly criminal illegal immigrants, or those with multiple cases against them beyond illegally crossing the border.

NBC News Spreads Fear, Lies With "Ghost Gun" Fake News.  Here's the thing: former ATF agent Rick Vasquez and Jeff Rossen are boldly and directly lying to the viewers/readers of NBC News.  I know this from firsthand experience, as I've built semi-automatic firearms from the ground up, including AR-15s and an AKM.  You cannot buy "all the parts" for any firearm online and simply slap the pieces together to build a functioning firearm as they mislead viewers, and this is a very easy claim to debunk.  Every firearm made or imported into the United States has a part of the frame or receiver that the ATF recognizes as the actual firearm that carries the serial number.  All the other pieces are just parts.

Iceberg Story, Slim.  In the post-November 8 universe, one man's fake news is another man's vitally important scoop.  The third-most emailed article in today's [2/7/2017] New York Times is surely both things depending on who's reading it. [...] Here's the gist of it:  A crack is growing in the Larson C Ice Shelf, "in an area already vulnerable to warming temperatures" and may soon create a very large iceberg. [...] This is literally a story about an iceberg that could form — and then do no appreciable damage.  And lest you think there's any new information here, the Times reports that scientists have been monitoring the thing since 2014.

NBC's Holt Lectures Viewers on the Meaning of the Statue of Liberty.  With the debate over the legality of President Donald Trump's immigration and travel ban still raging Monday evening [1/30/2017], NBC broadcasted their Nightly News program "from the shadow of the Statue of Liberty" accompanied by a lecture from anchor Lester Holt. [...] But neither ABC nor CBS treated it as a time to seemingly pontificate about the morality of the issue, let alone march out to the Statue of Liberty and use it as a prop.

Trump's Reassertion of Common Sense is a shattering experience for death-wish liberals, bishops, and RINOs.  The grandstanding hysteria over Trump's travel ban on people coming from seven terrorist countries falls into the category of sound and fury signifying nothing, save the persistence of death-wish liberalism in our politics.  It happened so "abruptly," harrumphed the chattering class.  Really?  Trump has only been talking about the ban for over a year.  People in those countries had since his victory in November time to "prepare" for it.  Besides, since when has it been a constitutional right for peoples residing in terrorist hotbeds to travel inconvenience-free to America?

The Famed 'Doomsday Clock' Is More Like A Liberal Angst Meter.  When the Doomsday Clock launched in 1947, the initial setting was seven minutes to midnight.  Since then, it's gone up and down.  The furthest it got from doomsday was 17 minutes in 1991.  The closest was 2 minutes to midnight in 1953.  But it's clear from its movements over the past seven decades that the Doomsday Clock is more about politics than any sort of scientific measure of the risk of global nuclear war.  After all, it has routinely counted down after a Republican wins the White House, and ticked up when Democrats reclaim the presidency.

Grasping for Metaphor, Reporters Flock to Burning DC Garbage Can.  As chance would happen, many of the people upset by the presidency of Donald Trump took to the streets of Washington today [1/20/2017] to express their displeasure with the new administration.  Shortly after Trump was sworn in, a large march organized by the DisruptJ20 protest group set out from Union Station to McPherson Square, where it is holding a large rally.  When the march passed by 13th and K streets, Northwest, some in in the demonstration broke away and started throwing newspaper boxes, garbage cans, and other objects in middle of K Street and set them on fire, using Trump T-shirts as kindling.  And as any event involving the combination of garbage, fire, and a large crowd — coupled with its convenient location right outside the office of a major news organization — does, the small blaze caught the attention of seemingly every reporter within sprinting distance.

No, Trump's Dismissal of Obama's Ambassadors Is Not an Unprecedented Crisis.  President-elect Donald Trump's order for all politically-appointed ambassadors to leave their overseas posts by Inauguration Day is "breaking with decades of precedent by declining to provide even the briefest of grace periods," according to the New York Times.

The Election Was Not Hacked.  Despite the histrionic claims of the press, the election was not hacked.  The Democratic National Committee's lousy IT security allowed someone to access their emails which were then leaked.  Clinton's campaign manager John Podesta fell for an age-old phishing scam that was as believable as getting millions of dollars from a Nigerian prince.  Using the spotty media understanding of cybersecurity, they can claim that the DNC and Hillary's campaign were "hacked," but the election decisively was not.  And the press knows it.  In order to "hack" an election, a nefarious group would have to inltrate the voting systems of 50 states, plus DC and territories.  All of these systems are unique, with completely different architecture, ballot formats, tabulation processes, etc., etc.  This did not happen.  In fact, some hackers tried breaking into a few different states' systems weeks before the election, were quickly identied, and prevented from doing so.

'Russian hackers' penetrate US power grid with 'outdated Ukrainian malware'.  A Vermont utility sounded the alarm after finding malware code on a laptop that the FBI and DHS had touted as associated with Russian hackers.  However, cybersecurity specialists say the code came from an outdated Ukrainian hacking tool.

The Editor says...
This is one of the biggest mountains ever made out of a newsroom molehill.  Utility companies don't transact their business or control the power grid with laptop computers.  In any event, the presence of malware on one computer doesn't mean that any other computer was affected — or even the one with malware.  This story is a whole lot of nothing, probably intended to make Russia look like a villain, at a time when president-elect Trump is showing he's far more capable of dealing with Russia than Barack H. Obama ever was.

Russian Hacking Malware Found on Vermont Utility Computer.  Malware associated with Russian hackers was found on a computer belonging to a utility company in Vermont, according to the company.  After being alerted last night by the Department of Homeland Security about malware code used in Grizzly Steppe, Russia's hacking campaign against U.S. political institutions, Burlington Electric Department performed a scan, the utility said in a statement.  "We acted quickly to scan all computers in our system for the malware signature.  We detected the malware in a single Burlington Electric Department laptop not connected to our organization's grid systems," the statement said.  "We took immediate action to isolate the laptop and alerted federal officials of this finding."

Washington Post Publishes False News Story About Russians Hacking Electrical Grid.  The [Washington] Post [12/30/2016] story was titled, "Russian hackers penetrated U.S. electricity grid through a utility in Vermont, officials say."  The story said, "A code associated with the Russian hacking operation dubbed Grizzly Steppe by the Obama administration has been detected within the system of a Vermont utility, according to U.S. officials."  The Post published the story before being able to get comment from the two utility companies in Vermont.  The Burlington Electric Department would end up putting out a statement showing the premise of The Washington Post story as being untrue.

Update:
Wait, Never Mind, Russia's Not Trying to Destroy Vermont After All.  Hey, remember that ominous Washington Post story about Russia hacking a Vermont electrical company, and the scary warnings from Vermont Democrats that Vladimir Putin was attempting to shut down the grid in the middle of winter?  This morning [1/3/2017] the Post reports, "Whoops!"

Vt. utility not specifically targeted for hack, official says.  Federal investigators have found no information suggesting this city's electric utility was specifically targeted after Burlington officials found malicious software linked to Russian hackers on a department laptop, the utility's general manager said Saturday [12/31/2016].  Evidence of Internet traffic associated with Grizzly Steppe, a notorious Russian distributor of malware, was disturbing but did not pose a threat to Burlington Electric Department's highly computerized grid or its customers, said Neale Lunderville, general manager of the city-owned utility.  The stealth software, isolated on the one laptop, was discovered Friday [12/30/2016] as part of ongoing routine vigilance.

The Great Hacking of Vermont's Electrical Grid That Never Happened.  For starters, the computer that had the malware was an employee's laptop, and it was never connected to the Vermont electrical grid itself.  Vermont had not been specifically targeted, and the Post's original headline — "Russian hackers penetrated U.S. electricity grid through a utility in Vermont, U.S. officials say" — was false.  The statement from Burlington Electric Department General Manager Neale F. Lunderville not-so-subtly urges the media covering this news to get their facts straight: [...]

Washington Post corrects story on Vermont utility breach.  The Washington Post has corrected a story that originally said Russian hackers penetrated the U.S. electric grid by breaching a utility company in Vermont.  "An earlier version of this story incorrectly said that Russian hackers had penetrated the U.S. electric grid.  Authorities say there is no indication of that so far.  The computer at Burlington Electric that was hacked was not attached to the grid," an editor's note attached to the original article said.  The original story was published Friday, one day after the Obama administration announced new sanctions against Russia for its cyber activities.

Washington Post retracts story about Russian hack at Vermont utility.  The Washington Post has retracted its story about Russian hackers penetrating the nation's electricity grid with a virus found in a Burlington, Vt., electric company laptop.  "Authorities say there is no indication of that so far [that Russians had penetrated the US electric grid]," according to an editor's note attached to a corrected version of the story on the paper's website.  "The computer at Burlington Electric that was hacked was not attached to the grid," the editor's note read.

These Are the Media's Top Ten Embarrassments of the Year.  According to the major networks, Fidel was awesome, Hillary rallies are the best, and white people ruined America.

The Scourge of Dumb News.  Media is a product.  Firms that provide this product are servicing a need, and we'd only be kidding ourselves to claim news consumers desire only to be informed.  This isn't a matter of simple bias confirmation.  News outlets have begun to cater not just to partisans but the minimally informed for whom fleeting and shareable controversies provide a sense of feeling informed. [...] "Fake news" is a real problem, but it attracts a credulous audience because news consumers have been primed to expect emotional satisfaction from the news.

12 Fake News Stories from the Mainstream Media.  [For example,] Dateline NBC rigs a truck to explode:  In 1993, NBC News delivered a historic public apology for staging the test crash of a General Motors pickup truck for the Dateline NBC program.  The reporters wanted to demonstrate that gas could leak from the truck's fuel tank and cause a dangerous fire after a crash, so they rigged it with explosives. [...] Dateline NBC was far from the only example of dubious product-safety reporting.  It wasn't even the first time a vehicle was rigged to explode for a major network consumer report.

Amanpour: Media Should Fight Trump Because He Might Start Putting Us In Cages.  CNN's chief international correspondent Christiane Amanpour urged journalists Tuesday night to protect their profession from the "existential threat" of President-elect Donald Trump, who she implied might try to put the media in "cages."  Citing Trump's tweet about the media "inciting" some of the protests against him following the election, Amanpour warned gravely of authoritarian leaders who dismantle the free press and imprison journalists.

Corporate Media Berating Fake News Should Look In Mirror.  The corporate media has been abuzz recently about the surge of fake news stories tainting our digital ether, cautioning consumers against being conned by those pushing fantastical falsehoods online.  The glaring problem with this:  the messenger.  As reflective as the Democratic (and Republican) establishment should be in the aftermath of the Trump-nado that swept itself into the White House, the elites in our media should be looking themselves in the mirror morning, noon, and night, perhaps more than any other institution in the U.S.  Complacent for decades in a system of its own tone-deaf creation, political media elites have long operated by chasing the "horse race" of he-said, she-said politics — or in Trump's case, he-tweeted, she-tweeted.

Trump Sticks with People Who Stuck by Him, Media Bewildered.  As soon as the news broke that President-elect Trump had named Stephen Bannon as his chief strategist, the media began acting as if he'd just freed Charles Manson and given him the launch codes.  After helping Trump win in states where Republicans have sought nothing but moral victories for decades, Bannon seemed like a perfectly logical choice to keep close in an advisory capacity.

The Misinformation Age.  Consumers of mass media are not seeking to be informed, because they assume it is all nonsense.  They just want to be entertained.  It's probably why Trump is one nominee and Clinton is the other.  Everyone is looking forward to the brash bully tearing into the corrupt old cow.  It may be awful for the country, but it will make good TV.

Obama's legacy:  Dead cops.  [Scroll down]  For one thing, if Obama did his homework at all, he would know that what appears to be an explosion of killings-by-police is actually just an explosion of media hype on the rare occasions when it happens, often without any of the context that would help people explain why a certain thing happened.  A responsible president would urge people to wait for the facts and recognize that even though they can make mistakes, police officers have dangerous, difficult and crucially important job such that they do not deserve to be painted with a broad brush as a bunch of racists.

CNN's Liberal Meltdown:  Brexit Means 'Xenophobia,' 'White Identity' Win.  Liberal CNN anchor Christiane Amanpour suffered an epic meltdown on Thursday night [6/23/2016] as it became clear that Britain was asserting its national sovereignty and voting to leave the European Union.  The sneering Amanpour repeatedly derided it as an example of "xenophobia" and "white identity" politics.  Early in the evening, with the result still in doubt, Amanpour told Anderson Cooper:  "A lot of the Leave movements are led by the hard-right, very, very xenophobic, anti-immigrant, very populist, nationalist, white identity politics."  Later, as reality set in, the journalist referenced the current issue of The Economist and raged, "This marks a victory for the kind of economic nationalism, to quote this article here, for the kind of xenophobia, that will imperil the liberal world order that has guaranteed western prosperity and stability since World War II."

'This is the end': Media hysterical over Brexit.  Reporters around the world were left terrified, heartbroken and angry over the vote in the United Kingdom to withdraw from the European Union.  "No words.  The dream is over.  Britain has voted to fall into the sea.  This is the end," Fusion's Felix Salmon opined on social media.  "I despair.  This is not my England."  "I feel like there's been a death in the family.  There needs to be some kind of funeral," he added.

My Shared Shame: The Media Helped Make Trump.  Those of us in the news media have sometimes blamed Donald Trump's rise on the Republican Party's toxic manipulation of racial resentments over the years.  But we should also acknowledge another force that empowered Trump:  Us.  I polled a number of journalists and scholars, and there was a broad (though not universal) view that we in the media screwed up.  Our first big failing was that television in particular handed Trump the microphone without adequately fact-checking him or rigorously examining his background, in a craven symbiosis that boosted audiences for both.

Hillary's Really Bad Week No One Heard About because Guess Who.  Hillary Clinton had a gaffe-filled, staggeringly bad week last week.  It started with her politicizing Nancy Reagan's funeral and ending with more explosive allegations that her informal adviser Sidney Blumenthal had directly cut and pasted classified intelligence into an unsecured personal e-mail account.  But you wouldn't know it from media campaign coverage, which has been far more occupied with the GOP primary and the escalation of violent incidents at rallies.

Of Course Whites Commit Most Of The Crime In Fargo You Idiots.  It's time for another fantastically stupid "exclusive" news story from the folks at Fargo-based television news station Valley News Live.  Their big revelation?  White people commit most of the crime in Fargo.  A city where, according to the U.S. Census, is 90.2 percent white.

The myth of the cop killing 'epidemic'.  To hear the media tell it, America is in the grip of an unprecedented crime wave, an orgy of wanton murder in which heavily armed thugs randomly gun down innocent unarmed people, some of them teens, just for sport.  Except that these homicidal goons are wearing the blues and badges of American police departments.  It's the narrative that's given rise to the protest movement Black Lives Matter and to a growing public mistrust of the police in general.  From Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo., to the recent shooting of a middle-aged woman and a teen in Chicago, the body count seemingly keeps rising, exacerbating racial tensions and keeping the nation on edge.  And each incident is breathlessly reported by a media determined to show that America remains deeply, irredeemably racist.  Problem is, it's simply not true.

5 Devastating Facts About Black-on-Black Crime.  The mainstream American media is, again, happily hitting the Black Lives Matter crack pipe in its pernicious pursuit of high ratings. [...] [T]he ugly truth behind #BlackLivesMatter is that black people killing other black people does nothing to advance its political power in the same way that one white cop killing a black criminal can.  Despite the media's overindulgence on white cops killing blacks, there is still a far-larger amount of black bodies being sent to morgues by black killers.  Here's five devastating facts, liberals can't deny, that prove it.

The System Worked, So Why The Protests In Chicago?  The truth is the awful death is demeaned by another outbreak of the nation's protest industry, one that unfortunately doesn't move itself overseas.  The telling tip-off is the presence of Jesse Jackson.  Or Al Sharpton.  And protest leaders' choice of target, in this case a nationally familiar tourist area that — Oh, look! — is handy to all the local TV newsrooms.  And it piggybacks on a traditionally slow news day's fascination with holiday shoppers.  A perfect public-relations storm for protesters.

Don't Believe the Media!  You must keep in mind that the media industry is exactly that; an industry.  They must make greater and greater profits to satisfy their stockholders.  Dramatic reports of a child that is shot by another child increase ratings much more than reporting that 28 women used a gun to fight off rape today and every day, for that matter (the national average).  A heart rending image of a mother who just lost a child to a drive-by shooting drives ratings much higher than a dry report that violent crime is down in states with the least amount of gun control.  The simple fact is that violence sells! [...] Splashier news makes for more profit.  You can't blame someone for wanting to make more money, even if you disagree with how they do it.  So, it is imperative that you remember that those in control of the media have their own agenda and that agenda does NOT serve YOUR best interest.  Since violence sells and legal unrestricted gun ownership reduces violence, it is in the media's business interest to promote restrictions on legal gun ownership.

Media Coverage Foments Copycat Suicides, Including Mass-Shooter Suicides.  Earlier this year, the deranged 26-year-old gunman who snuffed out the lives of nine innocent human beings before taking his own life on the campus of Umpqua Community College provided some real insight into the minds of the young men involved in what is a disturbing — and growing — trend in America:  mass-shooter suicides.  And that's what these are, these mass shootings.  They are suicides that would not be big national stories without a body count that included innocents killed in movie theaters, churches, schools.  And, to judge from the shooter's words, they are mass shootings that might not have happened at all had there been no prospect of mass-media coverage.

No, You Do Not Have to Drink 8 Glasses of Water a Day.  If there is one health myth that will not die, it is this:  You should drink eight glasses of water a day.  It's just not true.  There is no science behind it.  And yet every summer we are inundated with news media reports warning that dehydration is dangerous and also ubiquitous.  These reports work up a fear that otherwise healthy adults and children are walking around dehydrated, even that dehydration has reached epidemic proportions.  Let's put these claims under scrutiny.

The Plight of the Unarmed Perp.  This is the point I really want to make: the constant emphasis on police shootings of unarmed men that we see in the press is, for the most part, crazy.  If you are a perp, or a suspect, or an inoffensive person walking down the street, you may be unarmed, but the police officer is not.  Nor, in most cases, will he have any immediate way to know whether you are armed or not.  If you attack him, what do you expect him to do?  Challenge you to an arm-wrestling match?  He is entitled to use deadly force to defend himself.  Attacking a police officer rarely ends well.  Likewise with fleeing a police officer who is ordering you to stop.  If there is a problem here, it does not demand a thorough revamping of American police practices.  Rather, it suggests that those who have influence with a small demographic group — 6% of the population, according to the Post — impress upon them that they should not attack police officers under any circumstances, and if told to stop, they should stop.  If they put their hands up, they are not going to get shot.

Priceless Liberal reactions to allegedly violent black burglar shot by police.  We don't know all the facts.  Maybe he fought with the cops and they shot him in self defense.  Maybe he didn't fight at all and they still shot him.  What we do know, however, is that he rammed a dealership with his car and started to deface the cars in the lot.  He wasn't shot walking home from the library; he was shot while committing an act of violence and destruction of property.

Police Fatally Shoot Unarmed College Football Player.  Officers were responding to a burglary call about 1 a.m. Friday [8/7/2015] in Arlington when they discovered someone had driven a vehicle through a front window of the Classic Buick GMC, according to a statement from the Arlington Police Department.  The statement said police approached the suspect and a struggle ensued.  At some point during the struggle, an officer shot Taylor.

The Editor says...
Why is the perpetrator identified, every time this story comes up, as a football player?  What difference does it make if he plays football?  He certainly wasn't playing football in the closed showroom of a car dealership well after midnight.  The clear implication is that the liberal press considers football players to be on a plane above all others.

In Zimbabwe, We Don't Cry for Lions.  When I turned on the news and discovered that the messages were about a lion killed by an American dentist, the village boy inside me instinctively cheered:  One lion fewer to menace families like mine.  My excitement was doused when I realized that the lion killer was being painted as the villain.  I faced the starkest cultural contradiction I'd experienced during my five years studying in the United States.  Did all those Americans signing petitions understand that lions actually kill people?  That all the talk about Cecil being "beloved" or a "local favorite" was media hype?

Nets Spend 30 Minutes on Lion; Censor Abortion Videos.  The broadcast news shows covered Cecil the lion more in one day than they spent on the Planned Parenthood videos in two weeks — and that discrepancy only continues to grow.  In two days, ABC, NBC and CBS have spent 30 minutes, 1 second on Cecil, a famed African lion shot by an American dentist.  But anchors couldn't spare nearly as much time for the videos exposing Planned Parenthood's harvesting of aborted baby parts.  Since the release of the Center for Medical Progress' first video two weeks ago, the networks have spent only 11 minutes, 13 seconds on the story.

World Explodes over Dead Lion, Ignores Planned Parenthood.  On Tuesday [7/28/2015], the world lost its collective mind — whatever is left of it, anyway — when media discovered the identity of the killer of a Zimbabwean named Cecil.  Cecil is a lion.  Cecil, a lion, was by most accounts "one of Africa's most famous lions."  Cecil, incredibly, was famous for being a lion, not for curing cancer, although you wouldn't know that by the media coverage.  The man who shot Cecil, a lion, to death is Dr. Walter Palmer, a big game hunter who allegedly paid $55,000 for a big game permit.  He hired a guide, who lured Cecil, a lion, out from a protected area, where Cecil, a lion, then met his end.

The War on Black People in South Carolina: the First Casualty is Truth.  Mass murder was not enough.  Not for the army of reporters who soon after the South Carolina killings surrounded this truth with a bodyguard of lies.  The shooting was part of a pattern of white on black violence wildly out of proportion, journalists told us over and over.  The tragedy also reminded many scribes of the so-called epidemic of arson against black churches in the 1990s.  Neither of which are true.

If You're Going To Fake A Rape, Remember To Take Off Your Fitbit.  Technology can be a useful tool for the rape hoaxer, but inevitably it leads to the hoaxer's downfall.  Social media can catapult a mattress-carrying liar all the way to the State of the Union Address, but then her text-message record can show her for the fraud she is.  (And if she subsequently decides to post amateur porn online, well... )  A once-respected magazine can put a rape hoaxer in the headlines, but then a handful of bloggers questioning the story can bring it all crashing down.

ABC's '08 Prediction: NYC Under Water from Climate Change By June 2015.  New York City underwater?  Gas over $9 a gallon?  A carton of milk costs almost $13?  Welcome to June 12, 2015.  Or at least that was the wildly-inaccurate version of 2015 predicted by ABC News exactly seven years ago.  Appearing on Good Morning America in 2008, Bob Woodruff hyped Earth 2100, a special that pushed apocalyptic predictions of the then-futuristic 2015.  The segment included supposedly prophetic videos, such as a teenager declaring, "It's June 8th, 2015.  One carton of milk is $12.99."  (On the actual June 8, 2015, a gallon of milk cost, on average, $3.39.)  Another clip featured this prediction for the current year:  "Gas reached over $9 a gallon."  (In reality, gas costs an average of $2.75.)

Media distorts Bibi's statements, then claims he's walking them back.  The distortion of Benjamin Netanyahu's pre-election statements on a two-state solution and Arab voting was a classic Obama and media distortion.  If you take the actual text of Netanyahu said, he never ruled out a two-state solution and never discouraged Arab voting.  But those were the headlines and the foaming-at-the mouth hyperbole, fomented by the Obama administration in numerous anonymous statements to the media.

58,000 children 'abducted' a year: yet another fishy statistic.  [Scroll down]  In other words, these numbers come from an era that predates the wide use of mobile phones, which allow parents to keep much closer track of their children, or the creation of the Amber alerts (which are also on phones, in Facebook news feeds and so forth).  There is an update in the works but the results will not be released until sometime later this year.  So, first off, you see this is an estimate, based on a survey, not based on actual incidents.  NBC News claimed this was FBI data, which makes it sound like actual reports, but instead this was simply derived from a study conducted by academicians for the Justice Department.

NBC Devotes Nearly Four Minutes to Dress Debate, Seconds to Clinton Corruption.  On Friday [2/27/2015], NBC finally noticed the corruption scandal swirling around Hillary Clinton.  However, the coverage on the Today show was relegated to a 49-second mention within a story slamming Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker.  By contrast, the morning show devoted 3 minutes 56 seconds to a social media debate about the color of a dress.

Another Bogus Academic Study Creates Bogus Headlines.  Thanks to the Washington Post, we have new entry in what is surely the fastest-growing industry in academia: bogus studies that purport to show there is no difference between black and white rates of crime. [...] This latest headline from the Post tells a shocking story:  "Black teens who commit a few crimes go to jail as often as white teens who commit dozens."  Or it would be shocking if it were true.  But it is not.

Reporter is Maced After Storming a Police Station with Protesters.  If you run with radicals, expect to be treated like them.  You storm a police headquarters and you get maced for being part of the mob.  Oh, boo hoo!  This reporter should not have expected anything less.  He's lucky he didn't get shot.

CBS: Voter ID Laws Are Like Violent Attacks on Blacks at Selma.  The journalists at CBS This Morning on Monday [12/15/2014] compared the violent, bloody attacks on African Americans during civil rights marches in 1965 to voter ID laws passed by various states in the last few years.

The great campus rape hoax.  Americans have been living through an enormously sensationalized college rape hoax, but as the evidence accumulates it's becoming clear that the entire thing was just a bunch of media hype and political opportunism.  No, I'm not talking about the Rolling Stone's lurid and now-exploded fraternity gang-rape story.  Whatever the truth behind that story, it's now clear that basically nothing that Rolling Stone reporter Sabrina Rubin Erdely told us happened, actually happened.  But the hoax is much bigger than one overwrought and perhaps entirely fictional tale of campus goings-on.

Hysterical Media Tell Us to Calm Down.  In the past week, The New York Times has ridiculed Gov. Andrew Cuomo and Gov. Chris Christie for having "fed panic" by ordering quarantines for health workers arriving from Ebola-plagued countries.  [...] I haven't noticed any panic.  If you want panic, review media coverage of the police shooting in Ferguson, Missouri.  That hair-on-fire coverage was based entirely, it turns out, on the media's gullibly swallowing inaccurate accounts of the incident.  For decades liberals have terrified soccer moms about a slew of imaginary terrors:  global warming, Alar on apples, breast implants, heterosexual AIDS, nuclear war, and Republicans taking away their birth control.

Ebola and the Media's Multiple Personality Disorder.  While The Daily Mail suggests that terrorists could transform the virus into a weapon, The Daily Beast declares that the "Ebola Panic Is Worse Than the Disease."  Fox raises the specter of illegal immigrants bringing the virus over the border, and MSNBC assures us that the authorities have things in hand.  One outlet asks an author of medical thrillers to speculate about the ways the threat might mutate into something more frightening; another declares that we're watching an "epic, epidemic overreaction."  Wait, sorry:  Did I say that was "another" outlet?  Actually, those last two both came from CNN.

Media Should Stop Lecturing Americans About Their Ebola Concerns.  The very moment that the news was confirmed about Dr. Ebola, various reporters started telling everyone to calm down.  But nobody was panicking.  I mean, expressing interest in an unbelievably deadly disease that has spread quickly is not panicking.  Panicking is loading up your car like a prepper who just won the Lottery and heading to your cabin in West Virginia.  I mean, maybe there's someone who has done just that.  But there is no evidence that we have any serious problem with people panicking.

Race-Baiting CNN Falls For Another Trayvonesque Hoax.  Desperate to frame the shooting death of Michael Brown in racial terms, CNN has bitten hard on what appears to be faked evidence.  The network did the same thing during the Trayvon Martin case.

Ebola Optics and Questionable MSM Smiley Narratives.  Conservatives can be forgiven if, after having carefully reflected upon a sampling of MSM Ebola narratives, they conclude that something seems a bit askew.  Certain optics and associated stories appear to put a giant smiley face on the Ebola situation.  Nothing to worry about here.  Move along.  However, certain omissions raise troubling questions in regard to what we have been told — especially when the omissions are conjoined with scientific findings on Ebola. [...] The MSM is obviously populated by many people whose mouths are as big as their brains are tiny.  It is therefore no surprise that many such people do not know how to recognize when a question is really statistical in nature and, if it is, how to analyze it.

About That 'World-Ending' Solar Storm...  News of a devastating solar storm 'just missing' Earth in 2012 made the rounds last week.  Turns out that storm was nowhere near us, and similar storms have happened before.

Taliban sets oil tankers on fire in Afghanistan.  Television footage showed black smoke billowing above the site of the attack, with the charred wreckage of dozens of trucks scattered around a vast parking space.  The Taliban claimed responsibility for the attack, saying the trucks carried fuel intended for U.S.-led NATO forces.

The Editor says...
The sensational headline would lead most readers to believe that somebody had set fire to two or more ocean-going oil tankers.  In reality, only a few thousand gallons of oil — in ordinary trucks — appear to be involved.

U.S. passenger jet nearly collided with drone in March: FAA.  An American Airlines Group Inc aircraft almost collided with a drone above Florida earlier this year, a near-accident that highlights the growing risk from rising use of unmanned aircraft, the U.S. air safety regulator said.

The Editor says...
Don't be deceived by the sensational headline.  It was a small plane, a small drone, no collision, very small story.

Barbara Walters is TV personality, not a journalist.  Walters broke into the media business as a behind-the-scenes writer at NBC, eventually working her way up to be co-host of "Today."  She entered the network news world with no journalistic credentials, a fact that bothered the grizzled news veterans of the day.  She made history in 1976 when ABC hired her to be the first woman to co-anchor a network evening newscast.  The gimmick of hiring a "Today" host to do a serious newscast never worked.  Walters had built her career as a morning gabber, and that didn't translate to the serious news anchor desk.

Dateline producer suing NBC.  Women working at NBC's Dateline show are regularly asked to pose as 'sexual bait' for stories about prostitution, sex trafficking, and sexual deviants according to a female producer who is now suing the network.  New York-based Kimberly Lengle, 33, says she quit the program last April after a senior HR director failed to follow-up on her complaints about the practice.

Logic Gets Sucked into the Polar Vortex.  North America is presently experiencing the kind of abnormally cold temperatures that can wreak havoc on computer climate models.  The mainstream media is overflowing with headlines about coldness raging unexpectedly across Canada in January, Jack Frost nipping at people's noses, and other signs of the Apocalypse.  Naturally, then, it was only a matter of time before these media outlets — aka the global Ministry of Propaganda — let the other shoe drop, and explained how all this routine winter weather is the result of man-made global warming, and therefore can only be halted by international totalitarianism.

Obama portrayed as victim.  Some may think reporters and editors are simply clumsy or indifferent writers, and sometimes they are.  But much of the time they choose their words (and photos) with exquisite and subtle care.  They also realize that most people only look at the headlines and photos of most articles, and that those are therefore the most important elements, and that even people who do read the article often read only the first few paragraphs.

The media war over George W. Bush's stent.  From Benghazi to the health of former President George W. Bush, wild unsubstantiated assertions by the news media take the place of real reporting.  Fox News is left to set the record straight, yet frequently it doesn't get the credit it deserves.  The stent placement in President Bush's coronary artery is the latest example of the world of Fox News versus wild speculation.

Media Coverage of Benghazi Leans Toward Political Theater.  First, we learned from the Obama Administration that it was a YouTube video that sparked the protests — a false narrative gladly perpetuated by the media as long as possible.  Currently, the media and the administration are pushing the story that attempts to investigate Benghazi constitute a Republican vendetta, the perpetuation of a "phony scandal" to incite the populace against the President and former Secretary of State — and presidential hopeful — Hillary Clinton.  To this end, it is not surprising that key details of the recent congressional hearings on Benghazi went largely unnoticed by the mainstream media.

Art Horn Letter to Connecticut State Department of Agriculture.  Hurricane Sandy was not a "Super Storm".  This label was assigned by the news media.  Those who called Sandy a Super Storm did so because they liked the sound of "Super Storm."  Having worked in television news rooms for 25 years I am well acquainted with these exaggerations.  The term "Super Storm Sandy" sounds much more dramatic than "Sandy is a category one Hurricane on a scale of one to five" which is what it was.

Breaking News! Seventh First Climate Refugees Discovered!  BBC, your climate reporting is pathetic.  Doesn't anyone there think to check up on some dewy-eyed reporter gushing on about the tragic fate of the latest batch of pseudo-refugees?  Missing the facts in this story would have been understandable a decade ago, but in 2013, you guys are a running joke.

The Media's Moral Decline: Standards, Story Selection Now Tabloids On Steroids.  For those who don't live in New York and aren't familiar with the Daily News, it should be noted that while it sometimes reads like a tabloid, it is a legitimate news source and is mentioned in the same breath as The News York Times and New York Post one of the city's top newspapers.  In fact, the Daily News has won ten Pulitzers and is the fourth-most circulated newspaper in the United States.  To that end, these headlines aren't too different than what we see dominating national or local cable news today, and by extension (since we cover this stuff), Mediaite as well.

An Abortionist's Unglamorous Victims.  He's allegedly killed more people than Jeffrey Dahmer and John Wayne Gacy combined, but most Americans have never heard of him. [...] We have wall-to-wall coverage of Jodi Arias, a lone nut who admits to killing her boyfriend in Arizona, but a blackout on Kermit Gosnell.  And why wouldn't we?  The Arias trial involves nude pictures, kinky sex, and an attractive woman.

The 10 Absolute Worst Media Reactions To The Boston Marathon Bombings.  In the media business, what's the one thing you can consistently expect from reporters, pundits, "experts," and anchors on the day of a major news event?  Speculation.  Wild, unabashed speculation.  Oftentimes, their conjecture is based on their own political beliefs and agendas.  And this can lead to some particularly ugly comments while the wounds are still fresh during major tragedies like the Newtown and Aurora massacres... and Monday's Boston marathon bombings.

The Media's Privacy War.  Sensationalizing the news and publicizing the story non-stop allows advertisers to count on human nature.  The public tunes in and/or buys the newspaper.  Media networks bet that if you get hooked on the drama, the personalities of the reporters, you will keep watching or buying the particular outlet for your news.  High viewership and readership increases the likelihood of advertising sales.  The media wages a privacy war for money.

Woodward-Sperling Flap May Turn Tide.  The more superficial the brouhaha the bigger its impact.  What public figures say is more important than what they do, because cable TV and political blogs can cover a mud fight more cheaply and more easily than they can a real story.

Geraldo Rivera and Common Decency.  There are those who will dismiss Fox News personality Geraldo Rivera's announcement that he is considering running for the U.S. Senate in New Jersey in 2014 as a Republican as just one more publicity stunt in a career replete with them.  Rivera's public record is mixed, as it has combined serious advocacy on a number of issues with the sort of foolish excess that has given a bad name to tabloid journalism.  If people think of him more as a celebrity than a journalist, it is his own fault and not something that he has seemed to mind very much.

The media love maniacs.  The same media that pointedly ignore frequent life-saving defensive uses of firearms consistently pours hours and days and weeks of attention upon the latest maniac who chooses a firearm as his tool of mass murder, so that the next potential insane villain cannot fail to notice the easy path to fame and immortality that the misuse of a gun can bring.  But the greatest fame will only attach if they can beat the previous body-count record, a number constantly and loudly broadcast, so that no one can fail to hear it.  The message to the unstable is clear:  Come on, you crazy guys, can't you at least murder your way to thirty?

Newtown is the Latest Example of Media Overkill.  On behalf of all us, I beg the media:  Please go away.  Please stop cold calling my friends who live in Sandy Hook for potential news nuggets.  Please stop harassing people like my mother as they leave funerals.  Please stop parking on people's lawns without permission.

CBS presents hype as news.  Does anyone remember when CBS used to be a respected news organization that did its own research — or at least quoted independent experts?  Or even conducted interviews?  When it comes to health and science news, alas, it seems like they've been reduced to rewriting alarmist or sensationalist press releases.

The 'Screw Science' Media and Super Storm Sandy.  When science departs from the scary-story script, journalists are the first to dismiss its importance.

A Tsunami of Exaggeration.  One of the current obsessions is how much debris from the tsunami in Japan last year — some of it possibly radioactive!!! — will be washing ashore in North America.  Usha Lee McFarling writes in the Los Angeles Times that we should all calm down.

When 'Minority' is a Trick of Definition.  When the Census Bureau this month issued a press release headlined "Most Children Younger Than Age 1 are Minorities," the media snapped to attention.  News outlets nationwide covered the announcement, hailing it as a "historic demographic milestone" (CNN), as the "dawn of an era in which whites no longer will be in the majority" (Washington Post), and as an "important turning point for the nation" (McClatchy) that would "starkly ... change the face of America's next generations" (Time).  None of that was true.  None of that was new, either.

Mike Wallace, Entertainment, and Journalism.  On the back nine, Mike liked to think of himself exclusively as a journalist.  The network might have plucked him from daytime television — but taking the shill out of the entertainer was another matter.  Wallace was the quintessential barker, an ambulance-chaser with press credentials.  He perfected the art of "ambush" journalism at CBS.  With such tactics, copy led only when it bled.  Indeed, Mike Wallace's career echoes some of the more predatory traditions of broadcast journalism.

Journalism's Eroding Integrity.  The ABC News product increasingly ceases to be journalism.  It is sensationalism.  It is reprehensible.  It's time to let ABC News feel the sting of public disapproval.

Journalists don't have good grasp of religion.  Evidence of big media's bias against religion that doesn't advance the secular and liberal agenda of the Democratic Party is beyond dispute.  Any faith attached to a conservative agenda is to be ridiculed, stereotyped and misrepresented.  Islam is a notable exception.  The media appear to bend over backward not to offend Muslims.

ABC News' reporting on the Aurora shooting is even worse than we thought.  Apparently this story isn't horrible enough already.  The people we used to count on to tell us the news keep doing [everything they can] to make it even worse.

Police called in because of disruptive MEDIA members harassing employees at Hollywood Chick-Fil-A 'kiss-in'.  Apparently, in Hollywood, CA police had to be called in because of disruptive people.  The police weren't called in because of the protesters doing anything wrong, but rather for the pink slime media members who were harassing the employees!

Upon Further Review?  How the media does love its monsters.  The media got an early Christmas gift from Jerry Sandusky, who fills the hideous monster vacuum that had developed after Osama Bin Laden was slain.  How the media does love its monsters.  After Bin Laden, the monster niche was neatly filled by Dominique Strauss-Kahn (almost forgotten now, relegated to media monster purgatory.)  Prior to DSK we had folk villain Bernie Madoff, after which Michael Vick's head was served to us on a platter.  Prior to Vick came loony monster Mel Gibson, preceded by Timothy McVeigh, the Unabomber and, to be sure, O.J. Simpson, a sort of monster emeritus.  Qadaffi was October monster of the month, giving way to Sandusky.

What is Poverty in the United States Today?  [Scroll down]  Mainstream news media also present poverty in America as severe material hardship. ... The ongoing use of examples of severe hardship in TV news should not be surprising.  TV news thrives on drama, and reporters naturally seek out the starkest and most sympathetic examples of poverty to build the most compelling stories.  By contrast, a realistic portrayal of the living conditions of the typical poor family in America would not make compelling viewing.  In fact, the audience would be unlikely to regard such a family as seriously deprived.

Payday Loans.  The mindset of the left was recently displayed in a big, front-page story in the October 30th issue of the San Mateo County Times.  It was an investigative reporter's expose of the "payday loan" business and its lobbyists.  According to the reporter:  "In California lenders charge up to $45 in fees on a maximum $300 loan.  This amounts to an interest rate of 460 percent, trapping some borrowers into a never-ending cycle of debt." ... Using this kind of reasoning — or lack of reasoning — you could quote the price of salmon as $15,000 a ton or say a hotel room rents for $36,000 a year, when no consumer buys a ton of salmon and few people stay in a hotel room all year.  It is clever propaganda, but do people buy newspapers to be propagandized?

Jackie, Oh No.  Is there a more empathetic person in the world than Diane Sawyer, the top newsreader at ABC TV?  I'm sure there must be — around seven billion of them, probably.  But is there anyone who looks more empathetic than Diane Sawyer?  Not a chance.  When she peers at you through the camera she has the look of someone who's just seen your lab results and is trying to figure out how to break the bad news.

The Editor says...
Bill Curtis of WBBM-TV has perfected the "phony concerned look".

Understanding Poverty in the U.S.  Poor Americans, on average, live in larger houses or apartments than does the average, non-poor individual living in Sweden, France, Germany or the United Kingdom.  The media cry with alarm that "nearly one in four kids" in the nation are hungry.  Again, government data show otherwise.  Fully 96 percent of poor parents stated that their children were never hungry at any time during 2009, despite the severity of the recession, according to data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

A Weather Newsgasm.  [Scroll down]  The incessant "news" coverage reflects the way television (and print) news professionals tend to regard viewers as too stupid to make decisions as basic as preparing for the hurricane or evacuating before its arrival, nor do they just report the news, i.e., the facts.  So far as Irene was concerned, they engaged in massive speculation and endless predictions.

Here's an example of news media alarmism:
Atop TV Sets, a Power Drain That Runs Nonstop.  Those little boxes that usher cable signals and digital recording capacity into televisions have become the single largest electricity drain in many American homes, with some typical home entertainment configurations eating more power than a new refrigerator and even some central air-conditioning systems. ... One high-definition DVR and one high-definition cable box use an average of 446 kilowatt hours a year...

The Editor's rebuttal:
Do the math.  446 kWh a year, consumed by an appliance that runs 24 hours a day, is an average power consumption of only 50 watts.  Is that more power than your "central air-conditioning system" uses?  Nobody put a gun to your head and forced you to get a high-def DVR and a cable box.  If that's how you want to spend your money, that's your business.

Exploiting the Japanese.  For the left, no crisis is too terrible to go unused.  So it is with the horrific suffering that has taken place in Japan. ... In [an] appearance on the NBC Nightly News, Edward Lyman of UCS stressed the ominous situation in Japan while at the same time stressing that "it can happen here."  The "safety bar is set too low," Lyman insisted.  We need more restrictions — presumably the sort that would slow down further nuclear power development or shut it down entirely.  Suddenly, the media was full of the "worse than Three Mile Island" scenario — the worst nuclear catastrophe since Chernobyl.  Come to think of it, has there been a nuclear "catastrophe" since Chernobyl?  Is the situation in Japan, however serious it may be, a Chernobyl-scale accident?  Not likely, but the media seems to be licking its lips, hoping it will come close.

Fear the Media Meltdown, Not the Nuclear One.  Relax:  this is not another Chernobyl or Three Mile Island, and I'll tell you exactly why.  The only thing to fear is the sensationalist reporting that has the world panicked.

The Media's Deadly Sin.  Last year I was listening to the radio and heard that our area had experienced an earthquake during the night.  I took the reporter's word that it happened; it had been so mild that I slept right through it.  In December 1995, if one weren't visiting a national park or applying for a passport, the government shutdown had the same impact as that earthquake.  In other words, if it hadn't been for the media caterwauling, the majority of us wouldn't have even known the shutdown had happened.

Journalists' sob stories block reform.  Now that budget battles have begun in earnest all around the country, those advocating spending cuts, Democratic and Republican, had better not expect any help in furthering their cause from the mainstream news media.  In fact, the news media might be their most formidable foe.  How so?  Well, now that we know the targets of the cuts, the news media, suckers for a sob story, are already throbbing with carefully orchestrated, heart-rending tales about what devastation those cuts will cause:  Children who won't be fed; students unable to afford college; classrooms bursting at the seams; cancers that will not be treated; trains that won't run; roads that won't be built; families becoming homeless or freezing in their unheated homes; single mothers who will lose child care and job training; food that will not be inspected; water and air that will be more polluted; farmers who will be forced from their land; playgrounds, parks, museums, libraries and health clinics that will be closed.  You know the drill.

The Toyota Death Panel.  The Toyota scare was just the latest in a long series of orchestrated crises, in the tradition of the Alar scam of the 1980s, or DDT hysteria before that.  It's very easy to provoke a media stampede against a large corporation.  The narrative plays into the anti-business biases of reporters, whose ears are hungry for the distant cry of trumpets calling them to battle in a populist crusade.

The Anti-Cop Trend That Isn't.  [Scroll down]  Dig into most of these articles, however, and you will find there is no real evidence of an increase in anti-police violence, let alone one that can be traced to anti-police rhetoric, gun sales, disrespect for authority, or "don't tread on me" sentiment.  (CNN is one of the few media outlets that have covered the purported anti-police trend with appropriate skepticism.)  Amid all the quotes from concerned law enforcement officials in MSNBC's "War on Cops" article, for example, is a casual mention that police fatality statistics for this month are about the same as they were in January 2010.

The Media's Debacles.  Without an analysis of the significance of an event, the news becomes an arena in which to compete for attention and the most outlandish, shocking, offensive or bizarre becomes "newsworthy".  Competition for sensational news is no less intense today than it was when the so-called "yellow press" in the United States, largely under the control of editor William Randolph Hearst, found Spain guilty for the disaster of the sinking of the U.S. battleship "Maine" in Havana harbor and provoked the Spanish-American War in 1898. ... A viewing audience unequipped with basic background information is likely to take at face value the absurd, shocking and grotesque if portrayed often enough and presented as "news".

IPCC Distortion Of Weather And Climate Is Reinforced By Media Hyperbole.  It's pathetic to watch the US mainstream media yearn for a hurricane, especially one that will threaten people.  They anxiously scan the weather maps off the coast of West Africa for any low-pressure system that might develop into a news making, life threatening, normal event.  It is another measure of how the media is not about news but editorializing, speculation and sensationalism.  Sadly, they are joined in this or at least not dissuaded or counteracted by government agencies.

Jacksonian America.  On September 11th 2001, about an hour after the planes hit the twin towers, Jo Moore, a senior advisor to Britain's Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions, turned away from the TV and fired off a departmental e-mail:  It's now a very good day to get out anything we want to bury.  I'm not sure where Ms Moore is these days, but June 25th and all the following week were even better days to get out anything you want to bury.  The House of Representatives passed the Waxman-Markey "cap-and-trade" bill ... And nobody cared.  Because Michael Jackson had died.

A pandemic of panic — are we dead yet?  We were all supposed to be in the graveyard by now, done in by AIDS, SARS, bird flu, poisoned peanut butter, Hong Kong flu, killer tomatoes, global warming and strangulation by kudzu.  But here we are, proof that there really is life after death.

The Great Liberal Pandemonium Machine.  The Mexican swine flu pandemic?  Oh, that's soooo yesterday.  Global Warming?  All those confident "scientific" predictions are falling apart around the world, even as greedy politicians still try to squeeze the last little drops of power and money out of them.  Human flesh-eating bacteria?  SARS?  Ozone holes?  Mad Cow?  The Curse of the Killer Tomatoes?  Water torture?  CO2?  Bee Colony Collapse?  It never ends.  As long as scare stories sell, as long as millions of indoctrinated suckers fall for them they will never end.

After salmonella, bird flu, the Millennium Bug... should we actually be scared this time?  Don't we have the sense that we have seen this kind of panic before, which eventually turned out to have gone way over the top?  The moment which more than any might have set off a severe attack of deja vu came when the BBC Today programme wheeled on an expert from the World Health Organisation to tell us that '40 percent' of us in Britain may catch swine flu — while another unnamed expert was quoted predicting that '1.2 million' Britons could die.

Yellowcake and Yellow Journalism:  On MSNBC they're covering the [Scooter Libby] trial like it's the Normandy Invasion, starring Elvis Presley, as told by Joseph Goebbels.  MSNBC's "reportage" consists of endless repetition of arbitrary assertions, half-truths and thoroughly debunked canards.  No one else cares about the trial — except presumably Scooter Libby — so the passionate left is allowed to invent a liberal fable without correction.

Yellow Science:  Man has always had a healthy desire for knowledge, and it is the feeding of this hunger that ennobles journalism.  Hearst and Pulitzer were acutely aware that man has a less healthy but no less voracious desire to believe that he has knowledge, particularly knowledge of something sensational.  It is the feeding of this hunger that irreparably disgraced journalism, and a century later now threatens to do the same to science.

The Fog of Breaking News:  Why you should take reports from the scene of a massacre with a grain of salt.

Paris, Lindsay and A-Rod?  We Don't Care!  Apparently, the causal relationship between the media's supply of celebrity gossip and the public's demand for it is a two-way street.  America's seemingly insatiable appetite for celebrity scandal is a troubling sign, but here's an even more alarming truth:  Our enemy — facing the most powerful military force in history — has never concealed its belief that its ultimate triumph, as well as our ultimate demise, will come about because Americans are too fat, lazy and decadent to care enough to fight for their civilization and their values.

Movie shows photo fraud involved in wartime journalism.  Numerous examples of Photoshop embellishment and throw-down toys carefully arranged by news photographers to evoke emotion.

Amped-up storm coverage may become the norm.  Nearly a year later, hurricanes Katrina and Rita are still fresh on Gulf Coast minds, and Houston's television stations are trending toward more aggressive storm coverage.

The Editor continues to rant...
How can someone report current events aggressively without dishonest hype?  What does "aggressive coverage" really mean anyway?  It means the poorly educated masses in Houston will be drenched, if you will, with sensational, pessimistically speculative, tabloid television.  This style of "journalism" benefits only the TV stations and their advertisers, not the viewers.

How a New York Times reporter's passion for Castro led him astray:  Aha!  Finally we've discovered the missing ingredient in American journalism, the vitamin deficiency that's been shrinking newspaper circulation and TV newscast audiences all these years.  What Americans clamor for is not information but passion.  The heroes of the coverage of Katrina were not the reporters who got the most accurate stories but the ones who shouted the loudest or cried the hardest.

TV News Meets the Vast Wasteland:  Those amusing, though sadly depressing man-in-the-street interviews are an indication that the American hoi-polloi get whatever knowledge they may have only from TV newscasts, not printed material.  For this reason, national TV news has become increasingly more dependent on the sensationalism that their entertainment brethren can provide to attract viewers.  It's sometimes hard to determine where news coverage leaves off and entertainment begins, but the signs have been around for a long time.  The O.J. Simpson day-by-day trial was the most egregious example, but John Kennedy Jr.'s fatal flight coverage was a close second in televised excess.  Aging stalwarts like Barbara Walters think they can alternate between slobbering celebrity interviews and interrogating prominent political figures without suffering a lack of credibility.

Barbara Walters is not a role model.  She's written a tell-all autobiography.  And she's promoting it on ABC, which continues to employ her.  Once upon a time, legitimate news organizations would not have allowed a conflict of interest like this.

ABC Even Complains About Charity.  No good deed goes unpunished — that was the theme of an ABC Christmas day segment about donating clothing to charity.  "World News Tonight with Charles Gibson," took "A Closer Look" at charities and gave the appearance of dishonesty.

RIP:  protest films, e-porn and bimbos.  Year's end is a time of many media traditions.  For example, the tearing away of the last page of the calendar is all the excuse TV producers need to recycle hours of sensational video footage of dubious news value on the pretense that viewers need to relive the last 365 days. ... And then there's the practice of "spotting trends" from the year.  Trend-spotting has become something of an obsession with today's journalists, particularly at newspapers coping with the fact that they don't "break" news the way they did in the past.

Long Winter for the Media.  It is an unsettling time to be a journalist.  You are either on the edge of extinction or in charge of the universe.  The newspaper industry is condemned to write piecemeal its own obituary without knowing when or how — or, truth be told, if — the end will come.  Broadcast media now possess a self-inflated importance that they rarely bother to deny.

The L.A. Times's Human Wrecking Ball.  Great newspapers take decades to build.  We are discovering that they can be dismantled in relatively short order.

Fence fiasco:  Or Feliz ano nuevo.  The decline of American sovereignty would typically be a big story in any year, but with all the news coming out of Hollywood this year, maybe it was a bit overshadowed by more significant events.  I mean, how can the virtual surrender of a 231-year-old nation to the Pollyanna-ish forces of political correctness possibly compete with the dramatic real-life struggles of Britney Spears, Angelina Jolie, Tom Cruise, and the nation's hot new nymphet, Britney's baby sister, Jamie Lynn Spears?

Summertime, and the news is so cheesy.  Last year's Great August Story was left-wing activist Cindy Sheehan's absurd campout near the president's Texas ranch, which, much to the dismay of Mrs. Sheehan, was interrupted only after Hurricane Katrina struck the Gulf Coast.  Remember the Summer of the Shark?  That was 2001, when the media hyped shark attacks, despite the widely acknowledged fact that the season's attacks were no higher than previous seasons'.

Bigotry and Sports:  Although not too many years ago, sports-writing was considered the "toy department" of journalism, the boys and girls in the press box have been eager to catch up to their counterparts in the "real" world.  And so, they are also no longer content with merely reporting the scores, trades and what have you; they must now generate the news.  And, similar to the mainstream media, they need divisive issues in order to push the agenda of all J-school graduates:  to change the world.

Hurricane Hype Clouds Warming Debate.  ABC's Jeffrey Kofman sounded the alarm about storms so bad scientists "are now considering adding a fearsome category 6.  That's hurricanes of more than 175 miles an hour.  Something no one would want to meet head-on."  No one did.  Category 6 wasn't even added, and the chorus of media hype about another deadly season of storms turned into so much hot air.  That's right — forecasts for the 2006 hurricane season, which ends November 30, have proven entirely wrong.  Instead of 17 tropical storms and hurricanes, we got only nine.

Frivolous politics:  In these grim and foreboding times, our media have this year spent incredible amounts of time on a hunting accident involving Vice President Cheney, a bogus claim that the administration revealed Valerie Plame's identity as a C.I.A. "agent" — actually a desk job in Virginia — and is now going ballistic over a Congressman who sent raunchy e-mails to Congressional pages.  This is the frivolous media — and the biased media.

9/11 Myths, Debunked.  Trust that conspiracy theorists will attempt to exploit the fifth anniversary of 9/11 to spread sensational claims and sensational lies.  Moreover, it's a fair bet sensationalist media will collaborate, not because the squawk show host or headline scribbler believes the poisoned foolishness, but because anger, fear and trembling sell.

Shepard Smith Smears Swift Boat Vets.  While some press attention has been focused on the seeming odd-couple of Rupert Murdoch raising money for Hillary Clinton, another fascinating relationship has apparently been developed between Fox News and Hugh Hefner's Playboy.  Fox News' Neil Cavuto aired an interview with Hugh Hefner on May 4, on the grounds that the announcement of his "Playmate of the Year" was "business news," and Fox News anchor Shepard Smith is interviewed in the June issue of Playboy magazine.

Al Gore and the Global Warming Scare.  People are naturally prone to worry about dangers that are invisible: radioactivity, for one spectacular example.  The media know this, and are forever trumpeting the discovery of new perils to scare us with.  Hardly a week passes without someone announcing that some familiar food or other useful substance has just been discovered to cause cancer (though usually only when administered in huge doses to mice).  Dangers associated with weather are special favorites because they are usually so difficult to cope with.  In recent decades, we have been treated to alarmist reports about impending disasters to be caused by nuclear winter, acid rain and the ozone hole.  But the Big Daddy of all such scare stories is "global warming."

Did someone mention Global Warming?

TV Jumps on Stale NSA Database Story.  Like the TV coverage, USA Today's story insinuated that the existence of the database was a major violation of Americans' privacy rights and evidence that the President was lying last December when he described the NSA's eavesdropping on suspected terrorist communications as limited and targeted.

Simply Put, the US Mainstream Media Provides an Inferior Product.  They may have the most advanced technology for delivering the news and the flashiest sets, graphics and promotional tactics; they may have scoured the earth for the "prettiest" people who can read Teleprompters and those with the most important sounding voices, but they have sacrificed their credibility at the altar of the almighty advertising dollar and because of that the public's trust in the mainstream media is shattered.

Drivin' and Not Cryin'?  When it comes to gas prices, the media too often know the price of everything and the value of nothing.  Flip open a paper and turn on the TV and you'll learn that gas prices are rising again.  "Stormy 6 Weeks Ahead" says CBSNews and warns consumers to expect "pain at the pump."

Digging for the truth:  Too many journalists fail to dig deeply enough to get to the real story.  They breathless hype the latest scare about everything from pesticides and "road rage" to cell phones and irradiated food.  Deadly dangers lurk everywhere, and your Intrepid Reporter is all that stands between you and certain disaster.

Media eat up absurd rape story.  I called it back in April.  When a black stripper claimed three white Duke University lacrosse players gang-raped her at a party, I knew instinctively it was a lie.  The tale reeked of Tawana Brawley-like fabrications.

Movie shows photo fraud involved in wartime journalism.  Numerous examples of Photoshop embellishment and throw-down toys carefully arranged by news photographers to evoke emotion.

Hold that opinion.  Opinion journalism — the business not of reporting what happened, but of commenting on it — tends to place a premium on speed.  When that story breaks on Tuesday, members of the pundits' guild spring into action as well.  Editorial writers and columnists tell their readers what the news means.  TV talking heads and radio pontificators pass judgment.  Internet bloggers — the commentariat's newest, increasingly influential players — scramble to weigh in.

CBS Whips Up Worry about Hurricane Season:  The first day of spring [2006] proved perfect timing for the CBS's Jim Acosta to resurrect global warming as the villain behind last year's hurricane season, downplaying how hotly debated the matter is in the scientific community.

NASCAR Furious With NBC Over 'Dateline' Segment.  "It is outrageous that a news organization of NBC's stature would stoop to the level of going out to create news instead of reporting news," [NASCAR spokesman Ramsey] Poston said [4/5/2006].  "Any legitimate journalist in America should be embarrassed by this stunt.  The obvious intent by NBC was to evoke reaction, and we are confident our fans won't take the bait," he said.

ABC Hatches Weeklong Series on Bird Flu:  In 2003, ABC questioned government's bioterrorism warnings, but now emphasizes the latest concerns on bird flu.

Are You Satisfied With Your TV News?  Sound bites!  They may be the death of Western civilization!  The triviality of our network and local TV news is well known.  Locally, so much of the local channels give us a steady diet of blood and guts that is debilitating.  All the accidents, the murders, the court appearances of sordid criminals, the crimes of all descriptions seem to be their main focus.

The propaganda broadcasting network:  The definition of propaganda describes ABC News' decision to enlist the services of actor and teenage heartthrob, Leonardo DiCaprio, to interview President Clinton about the environment:  "the spreading of ideas, information or rumor for the purpose of helping or injuring an institution, a cause or a person."

Cool Britannia:  Sometimes, during what are called "slow news periods," newspapers and magazines struggle to fill pages.  In America at least, they solve this problem several ways:  by printing what are generously called "puff pieces", by covering tabloid trash stories, or by recycling old items to try to get more mileage out of them.  We seem to be in one of those times nationally, even with the so-called "war on terrorism."  When George W. Bush choking on a pretzel is the big story of the week, you know it is a slow news time.

How CNN Creates The News:  CNN's "Compound" Interest:  Their interest is in ratings and sensationalism, not in accuracy or justice.

What is the media thinking by ignoring the Medal of Honor?  "If it bleeds, it leads" is a canon of today's mass media, so bad news usually trumps good news for editors and producers.  But this week proves there is an even more powerful maxim:  "Trivial celebrity news beats all."  The carefully choreographed royal pronouncement pushed at least two other events — far more important to Americans — well into the background of U.S. print and broadcast media.

Soft News Erodes Audience The rise in "soft news" and "critical journalism" could be turning off traditional news audiences, according to a Harvard University study.  Soft news was defined as being typically more sensational, more personality-centered, more entertainment-oriented and more incident-based than traditional public affairs news.

Christmas with Hef:  They claim that she gets "the big stories."  But MSNBC's Rita Cosby continues to dig in the bottom of the barrel to attract an audience.

Our most destructive kind of racism.  Paula Zahn devoted two of her hour-long CNN shows this week to the topic "Skin Deep: Racism in America."  After taking the time to watch, the question I walked away with was:  "What was the point?"  In my view, the shows told us little that most of us don't already know — strong racist sentiments exist in the country — and really never asked the deeper and more important questions about what this means and why we should care.

O.J., "Kramer" and limits:  This "If I Did It" book and TV interview monstrosity was deliberately planned for the last week of the November sweeps, and Simpson reportedly was to be paid a cool $3.5 million for his efforts.  It was a disaster.  Fox News Channel discussed the story relentlessly, obviously promoting both the book and the upcoming interview, but it backfired and open revolt ensued.

Celebrities At The End.  The surrealism of celebrity pop culture erupts when a major celebrity dies.  The sudden, mysterious death of Michael Jackson caused a near-total eclipse of the real news.  The cable-news channels blurred into 24-7 wailing walls for the so-called "King of Pop."  Television ratings surged with a big ka-ching.  So much for the "news" business.

The Michael Jackson funeral.  In their rush to pander to the lowest common denominator, the major media, especially television, have fallen for their own hype, in a self-reinforcing cycle of Jackson mania.  They believed the importance of their coverage was revealed by the fact that all their peers and competitors regarded Jackson as equally important.  The public has even less reason to place their confidence in the antique media that brought us the sensationalistic coverage of the funeral of a celebrity whose career and life have been falling apart for many years.

The 12 Days of Michael.  There's no doubt about it.  Celebrity is the media's top priority.  Michael Jackson's June 25 death overshadowed all other news for almost two weeks.  Nightly news programs on ABC, CBS and NBC featured at least one story each night about Jackson since his death.  More than half of those broadcasts aired since June 25 lead (sic) with a story about Jackson.

What ever Happened To The Erupting Iceland Volcano?  The Eyjafjallajokull volcano continues to erupt in Iceland, but the story has fallen off the very small mainstream media tabletop. ... A brief examination of climate history shows how much it changes naturally and how those changes are a great influence on nature and human history.  The planes may be flying again but the fallout from the eruption is just beginning.  The mainstream media ... quickly lurch on to the next hysteria leaving the outcome and fallout of previous hysterias unreported.

The Lies of Duke:  "She was black, they were white, and race and sex were in the air."  That's how a Washington Post columnist described the atmosphere that led to the brutal gang rape of Crystal Mangum by a group of Duke University lacrosse players in 2006.  You remember, right?  That was the violent, racially motivated hate crime that never happened.

Journalists become 'self-reverential' celebrities.  Newsmen have become the news.  And the gossip.  One may run for office.  Many are vying for a single plum job.  Another is suing his old network for millions.  It is a long way from the austere days of Eric Sevareid, when staid anchormen left stardom to Hollywood.

The national news media provide publicity for every crazed gunman who goes out with a bang.
Dial CNN for Murder.  The same dangerous pattern has been repeated again and again.  The disturbed man who took hostages at Sen. Clinton's headquarters in New Hampshire told loved ones to "watch the news tonight."  The shooter who terrorized an Omaha shopping mall by mowing down total strangers has achieved his goal (and I will not add to the problem by publishing his name).  He left a suicide note in which he predicted "at least now I'll be famous."  His picture is featured in every newspaper and is flashed on television hourly.  His miseries are being dissected and analyzed. ... And other disturbed people are watching and taking note.

The Media Has Declared... WAR!  Newsrooms and hospitals have one major thing in common:  the "hush" is the loudest thing anyone ever hears.  The "hush" is the moment when normal activity stops cold for an announcement of major events that will entirely reshape any usual activity.  While both newsrooms and hospitals stop on that kind of news — and then, following it, race into a whirlwind of overdrive — the similarities end there.  Hospitals gird for the incoming and the flood of bad news to follow; most newsrooms do not.  In a newsroom, tragic events are met with a different vibe:  an electric jolt that energizes the room with a sense of self-importance.  The shot of adrenaline that surges through a newsroom is fascinating to watch.

Media madness:  The Virginia Tech story.  There seems to be just one template for the media in covering tragedies like that which just occurred at Virginia Tech:  Discussion of further regulation of guns and so much coverage of the perpetrator that copycats are sure to be impressed. … Seeing the glorification of the latest mass murderer, the next Cho may be already getting some ideas about how to take follow in his footsteps.

Reducing the risk of copycat killers:  The way the media cover an event influences whether there will be repetitions.  For example, if a fan runs onto the field during a baseball game, the broadcast cameras usually avoid showing pictures of the fan.  The TV producers know that the fan on the field is seeking attention, and that, presumably, getting his picture on television will reward him.  Moreover, broadcasting the man's antics would encourage copycats.

Five Questions about Shootings at Universities.  The day after the mass murder of students at Northern Illinois University (NIU), the headline in the closest major newspaper, the Chicago Tribune, was:  "6 Dead in NIU Shooting."  "6 dead" included the murderer.  Why wasn't the headline "5 killed at NIU"?  It is nothing less than moronic that the media routinely lump murderers and their victims in the same tally.  This is something entirely new.  Until the morally confused took over the universities and the news media, murderers were never counted along with their victims.

In time of tragedy, media are at their worst.  The press, particularly television news networks … [are] competing with each other like starving dogs for the slightest new morsel of information they can then put on a permanent loop on cable TV, until the next fragmentary detail is pried loose by a reporter desperate to be first, for 15 minutes.  Because there isn't enough new information to fill the infinite void allotted to these stories, the press quickly succumbs to a kind of emotional vampirism, feeding off the grief, fear and anguish of victims clearly incapable of understanding their own feelings….

Murder by media?  Did the non-stop playing of the Virginia Tech killer's twisted thoughts help to push a fragile mind in Houston to walk the same grisly path?  Has the airing of that video set in motion other killers and imitators who may not carry out their copy-cat crimes for months or years?

Autism Fraud Just the Tip of the Iceberg.  The lead author of that anti-vaccine study, which also appeared in one most respected medical journals, The Lancet, was British physician Andrew Wakefield.  And its consequences include millions of terrified and confused parents, large drops in vaccination rates and death.  Yet while this "deliberate fraud" has been exposed, others continue to go unchallenged, or worse, get trumpeted by reporters who should know better.  Regarding Wakefield, many people, including me, have spent years puncturing his claims and those of his acolytes in the anti-vaccine movement.  But a media that thrives on sensationalism instead played up the phony link.

Hooked on trivia.  We try to hear and see no evil, but it's not far-fetched to suggest that future world events could quickly change the lives of millions.  So why then fixate on Anna Nicole, Rosie, Imus and Alec?  Simple — they are the modern equivalents of grotesque carnival freak shows that used to provide a perverse sense of escapism from what people dare not face.  Yet as our dependency on such tabloid distraction grows, so, too, do the real dangers that we ignore.

The Lines Between News and Entertainment are Blurring.  An on-screen NBC News identifier for a fictional debate on "The West Wing" and a "news conference" by a fake Boston Red Sox executive on ESPN show how fuzzy the lines between news and entertainment have become.

Too much TV drama over storms.  We are now celebrating the anniversary of the Katrina hurricane and if one did not know better, one would think it was a fantastic event. … The hurricane season started a couple of months ago, and when watching TV, reading the papers or listening to the radio, it was obvious that the media was waiting with bated breath for the next disaster.  The season is half over and we can report no disasters.  They really are disappointed.

Like the wind, hurricane predictions keep shifting.  Hurricane forecaster William Gray's team downgraded its predictions again for the 2006 Atlantic storm season Friday [9/1/2006], saying 13 named storms are likely to form this year instead of 15. … Before hurricane season began June 1, Gray's team called for 17 named storms.  He trimmed that to 15 early last month.

Weather has become bogeyman, news staple.  It began as a mass e-mail in a certain Seattle office building on December's first day.  A cold front was arriving!  Snow!  Ice!  Untold inches for the city and surrounding area! … The cautious drove home after lunch.  The brave stayed behind.  And the snow never came.  Not even an inch.

Global Warming to Blame for Hot Weather Hyperbole.  A heat index of more than 100 degrees for days on end not only drains the body and spirit, but it also takes its toll on the thesaurus.  There is a limit to the number of ways to describe the heat and still sound relatively intelligent.

Silly Talk:  How many times have you heard a weatherman say that the sun will try to come out later in the day?  Sometimes their prediction turns out to be false and I wonder whether they would explain it by saying the sun didn't try hard enough.  But it's not just weathermen who use teleological explanations, ascribing purposeful behavior to inanimate objects.

The Media Rush to Duke's Defense.  Usually, reporters breathlessly take everything prosecutors and the police say at face value, often to devastating effect upon criminal defendants.  The "perp walk," in which a suspect is paraded publicly in handcuffs from place to place, often after officials have told television producers where to place their cameras, is only the most visible example of this practice.  The reporters get their shot.  The police get to portray the defendant, innocent or not, as dangerous (i.e. guilty) in the eyes of potential jurors.

All the news is a stage.  As they spin the Saddam trial and deride our soldiers in Iraq, the lesson is clear:  These media masters of theater are incapable of delivering real drama and good news unless they control the script.  Fortunately, you control the remote.

What's Right About America!  Last Sunday when I returned from church services I opened my hometown newspaper, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, and settled in with a cup of coffee to review the day's news.  It was a good thing I had already received my inspiration at church, or I could have easily become downright depressed over the negative headlines in nearly every section of the paper.  The majority of headlines on the front page of each section promised a story that would focus on the negative aspect of an event or issue, rather than the positive contributions people are making to fix the biggest problems we face.

Don't put much stock in the TV experts.  Stocks go up and down, but eventually, most go up.  So if you invest and hold on, odds are you'll do quite well.

Ending a losing streak:  The left is on another losing streak today, and so their intellectual leaders in the liberal media have gone back to the old playbook for an easy win that will get their team out of its slump.  This time, it is the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer, which has been working for them since the days of Karl Marx.

Fred Barnes Calls Sheehan a "Crackpot," Rues Media Focus on Her.  Barnes criticized both her and the media's treatment of her:  "This woman wants to go in and tell the President that the war is about oil because the President wants to pay off his buddies.  She's a crackpot, and yet the press treats her as some important protestor."

The Brawley Case of the South:  [Scroll down] Reluctance to change a popular story line helps account for the strange press coverage of Cindy Sheehan.  That line pitted moral mom versus stone-hearted president.  When Ms. Sheehan's outbursts grew stranger, the press stayed with the soft line about a mother's grief and simply omitted her increasingly bizarre comments that American troops were "being sent to kill innocent people" in Iraq and that President Bush was "a filth spewer" and "an evil maniac" guilty of "blatant genocide."  The insurgents who killed her son Casey, on the other hand, were "freedom fighters."

Did someone mention Cindy Sheehan?

Let's keep arguing.  It's true that we have more semistructured "Crossfire"-style debates than ever before.  But much of this is rigidly preprogrammed sniping (I was once chastised by a TV producer for not interrupting other speakers more.  What a failure!)  Even when the sniping is downplayed, TV demands sharp sound bites, which pushes all talking heads toward more vehemence and simplemindedness.  Instant certainty becomes mandatory, a delivery style many talking heads start to regret before they're even out of the studio.  Where is the real debate?

None Dare Call It Fascism.  After Johnson's War on Poverty, Nixon's War on Drugs, and Carter's Energy Crisis, then came the premier liberal crisis of modern times, the Environmental Crisis.  The media predictably plays an enthusiastic accomplice in these schemes, not just because its members are mostly liberal, but more importantly, crises generate more readers, viewers, and listeners.  This is why the principal product American media sells to its customers is crisis, not information.



"The one function TV news performs very well is that when there is no news we give it to you with the same emphasis as if there were."
— David Brinkley *    

This is an original compilation, Copyright © 2024 by Andrew K. Dart


News Media Dishonesty
  ... aside from the specific cases cited above and elsewhere.

Bias is one thing, but sometimes newspaper and TV reporters are just overtly dishonest.

Overview and recap articles:

If it's in the media, it isn't true.  We cannot trust anything uttered by any politician or mainstream media outlet.  Nothing.  If the politicians and media are saying it, we would be safer to assume, until proven otherwise, that they are lying, treat it with suspicion and look very very closely at it.  A safe rule of thumb is: if it's in the media, it isn't true. [...] One thing that is becoming a strong feature of the current political puppet show is that nobody is proposing any real actions to improve the life, liberty, pursuit of happiness and overall survival level of the honest citizenry or to resolve the real problems that trouble, impede and suppress that citizenry.  If you look closely at what these con men are saying, you will discover mostly, if not totally, mere waffle and spin with no substance.  We are at the same time constantly and relentlessly told how bad everything is. [...] Thus we are encouraged to view the world as worse than it actually is.  That is not to say that there are not bad situations, just that they are always presented as worse and more frightening than they actually are.

The Editor says...
TV weather reports always make approaching storms seem more dangerous than they are.  Reporters try to make global warming sound like more of a threat than it is.  There is no "climate crisis."  The TV reporters certainly made Covid-19 sound worse than it was.  DDT never hurt anybody.  The polar bears aren't disappearing.  Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant.  The official explanation of WTC Building 7 is a pack of lies.  The 1995 Oklahoma City bombing — ditto.  The Crash of TWA 800 — ditto.  The Kennedy assassination — ditto.  (Just ask Dorothy Kilgallen.)  Jeffrey Epstein didn't kill himself.  Neither did Vince Foster.  Nobody knows who blew up the Nord Stream pipeline.  Nobody knows who left a packet of cocaine in the White House.  Nobody knows who leaked information from the Supreme Court.  Nobody knows who left dummy pipe bombs at the DNC and RNC headquarters on January 6, 2021.  (But if you took a cell phone to Washington DC that day, they know exactly where you are today!)  Islam is not a "religion of peace."  Riding on mass transit is not safe.  The 2020 presidential election was stolen.  Barack H. Obama is a Muslim, his birth certificate is a forgery, and he uses somebody else's Social Security number.  Numerous other examples of news media dishonesty can be found on this page.  I'm not the only skeptic in America.  There is no longer any good reason to have a TV in your house.  The TV is a liar.

The Media-Democratic Fusion.  If one were to listen during the last few years to NBC, ABC, CBS, NPR, PBS, MSNBC, or CNN, or read the New York Times, The Washington Post, The Chicago Tribune, or the Los Angeles Times, then one would have believed the following:  A) Donald Trump worked with the Russians to throw and win the 2016 election.  As part of that skullduggery, frolicking amid prostitutes he urinated on a Moscow hotel bed to spite Barack Obama.  B) He was mentally incapacitated as president and should have been removed under the 25th Amendment.  C) In 2020, his campaign once more worked with the Russians to create an exact replica of Hunter Biden's laptop, replete with dozens of lurid fake photos and hundreds of cleverly doctored emails to smear the Biden family and aid his own reelection effort.  D) Trump as chief conspirator preplanned a violent and armed insurrection that sought to storm and permanently occupy the government, violently hijacking the balloting and seizing the presidency — resulting in the murder of a Capitol police officer and the subsequent deaths of other traumatized officers.  E) For the last eight years, none of Trump's political opponents have ever destroyed subpoenaed evidence, conspired to hire foreign nationals to compile false and lurid files on him to subvert his political campaigns, or used their political offices to help solicit foreign money for family lobbyists.  F) Trump is the first major candidate and politician who allegedly overvalued his real assets to obtain a loan that he repaid; the first to have concluded non-disclosure agreements with potential embarrassing liaisons; the first ex-president to remove sensitive files to his personal residence; and the first to phone a state official to whine about the integrity of the vote count.  G) He is the first losing presidential candidate or major politician to question an election result or to seek redress through government agencies to rectify the purported corruption of the balloting.

It is no wonder Americans are so confused.  Here are some of the lies the media intentionally spreads as they push the leftist agenda and seek to destroy anyone who gets in their way:
  •   The border agents whipped illegal immigrants.  The media, Justice Department and other Democrats knew this was a lie from day one but didn't care.
  •   Women are going to die because abortion is limited or prevented.  This is a despicable lie meant to scare everyone.  Not one state that restricts abortion prevents the termination of a pregnancy when the mother's life is in danger.
[...]
  •   The "Hands up don't shoot" lie was meant to gin up racial hate and division against white cops.  How many cops have been injured or killed because so many in the media and others spread this lie?
  •   That January 6th was an armed insurrection.  The FBI determined it wasn't planned or organized and no arms were confiscated. [...]
  •   That the 2020 election was pure as the driven snow.  The media and other Democrats know that many states intentionally violated election laws and that Mark Zuckerberg's money violated laws but don't care.
  •   The Antifa and BLM riots were mostly peaceful
  •   That the U.S has always been a racist country, that all whites are racist and privileged, and all other races are oppressed.
  •   That the vaccines will prevent the virus.  The media sought to silence anyone who disagreed with the false narrative.
  •   That the CDC based everything on science.
[...]
  •   That the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation.  They made this up to bury the story before the election as they campaigned for Biden.
  •   That the science is settled that humans, fossil fuels, and CO2 cause warming.  There is not one piece of scientific data from the last 150 years that supports this theory, only easily manipulated computer models that have always been wrong.

Losing Confidence in the Pillars of Our Civilization.  Conservatives have always been amused by the liberal biases of the old network news and big-city print media.  But they grudgingly admitted that many liberal journalists of the last century were mostly professionals.  News divisions mostly reported the news rather than simply made it up.  Not so now with Big Tech and 21stt-century [sic] "woke" journalism.  Few reporters have yet offered apologies for helping hatch and spread the Russian collusion hoax that paralyzed the country for three years.  Few have admitted culpability for reporting as fact the various fantasies surrounding the Duke Lacrosse team prosecution or the Covington Catholic kids deception.  Many in the media ran uncritically with the Jussie Smollett concoction and the "hands-up-don't shoot" Ferguson distortions.  Journalists promulgated misinformation about the "white Hispanic" George Zimmerman-Trayvon Martin encounter, and doctored photos and edited tapes.  They invented the myth of the supposedly brilliant — but now utterly disgraced former Governor Andrew Cuomo — as well as the "Russian disinformation" yarn that allegedly accounted for the missing Hunter Biden laptop.  Most recently, reporters spread serial untruths surrounding the Kyle Rittenhouse trial.

When all the media narratives collapse.  [Scroll down]  Think of the other narratives the MSM pushed in recent years that have collapsed.  They viciously defamed the Covington boys.  They authoritatively told us that bounties had been placed on US soldiers in Afghanistan by Putin — and Trump's denials only made them more certain.  They told us that the lab-leak theory of Covid was a conspiracy theory with no evidence behind it at all. [...] Wrong.  Wrong.  Wrong.  The MSM took the ludicrous story of Jussie Smollett seriously because it fit their nutty "white supremacy" narrative.  They told us that a woman was brutally gang-raped at UVA (invented), that the Pulse mass shooting was driven by homophobia (untrue) and that the Atlanta spa shooter was motivated by anti-Asian bias (no known evidence for that at all). [...] More recently, the MSM were telling us for months that inflation is a phantasm. [...] Any concern was "fearmongering politics."  And now we wake up to the highest inflation in 30 years, counter-balancing wage increases. [...] We were told that vaccines would end the Covid pandemic. [...] We were told that the migrant surge at the border was just seasonal, and nothing out of the ordinary, even as 1.7 million migrants were illegally trying to get into the country in the last year. [...] We were — and still are! — being told by most of the media that critical race theory isn't in high schools at all.  Meanwhile, a tsunami of evidence is out there showing that it absolutely is — in every subject, and every class, as the central philosophy behind many states' education policies.  We all get things wrong.  What makes this more worrying is simply that all these false narratives just happen to favor the interests of the left and the Democratic party.  And corrections, when they occur, take up a fraction of the space of the original falsehoods.

Radio Free America — Rush's Legacy.  For decades — before the internet and satellite TV — news in America was controlled by a select few entities, all of which were closely aligned with the Democrat party.  ABC, NBC, CBS, and CNN controlled television and radio news.  The New York Times, Washington Post, Chicago Tribune, Boston Globe, and Los Angeles Times set the tone for printed news.  The media and leftist politicians they supported were creating narratives to shape public opinion.  They crafted their narratives by being selective in what news they presented, or by outright distortion of facts. [...]
  •   Walter Cronkite told us the Vietnam war was lost after the Tet Offensive.  In fact, Tet was a devastating loss for the North Vietnamese.
  •   We were told that socialism was superior to capitalism.  It just needed to be implemented correctly.
  •   We were told that Ronald Reagan was a fool and a dangerous warmonger.  Yet he won the Cold War without firing a shot.
  •   We were told that Cuba was a workingman's paradise with free education and medical care.  Yet people were fleeing the island on anything that would float.
We knew what we observed didn't quite fit the narrative being presented, but we weren't sure why.  We began to question our worldview.  We were being gaslighted.

The Media That Cried Wolf.  "The Boy Who Cried Wolf" is one of many of Aesop's fables. [...] The moral is that nobody believes a liar, even when he is telling the truth.  How is a twenty-five-hundred-year-old story relevant today?  Let's rewrite the fable bringing it up to date.  The shepherd boy today is the collection of social justice warriors throughout the media, academia, and entertainment worlds, basically the core of the modern Democrat Party.

The Trump Nail in the Media Coffin.  When Cronkite returned from Vietnam after the 1968 Tet Offensive and declared the war stalemated and unwinnable, no one dared to offer the dissenting viewpoint that Tet was actually a decisive American victory.  The mainstream-media narrative in 1963 that Lee Harvey Oswald, the Castroite, Communist assassin of President John F. Kennedy, was a product of right-wing Texas hatred was completely crazy — but largely unquestioned. [...] MSNBC anchor Brian Williams sermonized about the so-called "fake news" epidemic.  Williams failed to remind us that he was removed as NBC's evening news anchor for serving up all sorts of fake details about his supposedly brave trips abroad in search of edgy news stories.  After the fatal shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, the co-hosts of the show CNN Newsroom collectively put up their hands in "hands up, don't shoot" solidarity — echoing a narrative of police murder later proved to be completely false by a lengthy federal investigation.

The Myth of the Good Old Media.  Donald Trump recently noted that the media had become much worse since Walter Cronkite, which is an honest mistake by a man who grew up as a Democrat leaning to the left.  But there was no "Good Old Honorable Media."  The establishment media have been utterly biased and often outright dishonest for many decades.  The 1965 CBS documentary Hunger in America began with outright lies, citing an infant dying in a hospital as the victim of malnutrition, which was pure invention.  The 1971 CBS documentary The Selling of the Pentagon actually took the answer of an assistant secretary of state to one question and edited it so that he was giving the answer to another question — and the documentary did that over and over again.

Journalistic standards have had nothing to do with the truth for a long time.  The media knows that Trump gave aid to Ukraine with nothing in return and Obama/Biden withheld aid and only gave a loan to Ukraine after they demanded and got a prosecutor fired, but they say Biden/Obama did nothing wrong and Trump should be impeached.  We don't have the right to hear from anyone who disagrees on climate change.  How does so much of the U.S have exceptionally low temperatures if 150 years of fossil fuel use, 150 years of CO2 increase and an exponential increase in the number of people worldwide causes warming?  While the media intentionally hides the truth for things negative to Democrats, they collude with Democrats to perpetrate a known lie that Trump colluded with Russia in 2016.  They perpetrated gossip to take out Kavanaugh in 2018 with no evidence.  They intentionally lie about what Trump said about Charlottesville to gin up racial hate and violence.  They treat congenital liars Schiff, Brennan, Clapper, Rice and others as credible people as they seek to destroy Trump and elect democrats.

If Anyone Should Be Impeached, It's the Liberal Media.  For decades now, in violation of the public trust, liberals in the American mainstream media — including the news, information, and entertainment media — have willfully corrupted the values and institutions that made the United States of America into the greatest nation in the history of humanity.  Their lies and immorality have wrought havoc on families, churches, schools, businesses, corporations, governments, and so on.  Contrary to their sacred duty to provide what is truthful, they have willfully presented false and misleading information to the public at large concerning, but not limited to, the following:  [#1] The election of Democrats over Republicans. [...] [#2] The role of good government — especially in most every fiscal matter. [...] [#3] The nature and details concerning radical Islam and Islam in general. [...] [#4] The nature and details of the burning of fossil fuels as it relates to global climate change — specifically what is often referred to as "global warming."

Trump, Kavanaugh, Lewandowski and our malignant Left.  This new attempt by the NYT and two wholly unethical reporters at that paper again crosses all lines of respectable, legitimate journalism.  The NYT is no longer, and has not been for ages, an honest broker of the news; it is rag that dispenses fake news intended to deceive.  The facts of this campaign to ruin Kavanaugh and his family, because the left wants to protect unimpeded abortion rights, are well-known and obvious.  They are also a stain on all those who participated in the scheme, a scarlet letter of a sort.  Nothing any of them ever writes again can be or will be trusted.  Nothing published by the NYT can be trusted.  Nothing on CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS or NBC can be trusted.  They are all agents of corruption and deceit.

The Best Of CNN 2018.  CNN's version of "news" has become outright parody so many times in 2018 it was difficult to keep track of.  Thankfully, Mark Dice has done just that with a "Best of CNN" video that lays out just how idiotic the Establishment Media now is as they get completely lost within their own anti-Trump hysteria.  Anyone who still considers CNN, MSNBC, the New York Times, etc., actual news needs to get their collective heads examined.  It's globalist propoganda — all of it.  [Video clip]

Who Watches the Media Watchdogs?  Who was it that told America Al Gore won the 2000 election?  Who told us the Fort Hood shooter wasn't an Islamist terrorist?  Who told us a meek and mild Michael Brown was shot with his hands up, begging to surrender?  Who told us CAIR, the Muslim Brotherhood front in the U.S., is a "civil rights organization"?  Who is still telling us that after 9-11, there was a violent "backlash" against Muslims in America?  Who told us climate change is settled science?  Who ducked the story about abortionist Kermit Gosnell's Philadelphia slaughterhouse?  Who told us all the troubles in the Middle East are caused by Israel?  Who told us that Robert Mueller's list of indictments proves Trump colluded with Russia?  Who told us it was Trump who initiated the "policy" of family separation at the southern border?  Who ran a fake magazine cover to show Trump looming over a crying Honduran toddler?

Hall Monitor Nation.  The media relentlessly lied to the public about Hillary's health, denouncing conservatives as "conspiracy theorists" for mentioning it.  Then an alert citizen with an iPhone captured Hillary having to be carried to her car at the 9/11 memorial service in 2016.  Mainstream media outlets painted a cherubic picture of Michael Brown after he was fatally shot by Missouri.  He was a "gentle giant," gunned down like a dog as he plaintively cried, "Hands up! Don't shoot!"  HEY!  Wait a second!  How did that video get out of Brown manhandling a tiny Indian man while robbing a convenience store?  That should have been suppressed like the Broaddrick interview!  Would we ever have known about Monica Lewinsky, but for the Drudge Report publishing the blockbuster story that Newsweek had killed?  Currently, the establishment media are in a rage that the public has found out about the modern genocide being waged against white South African farmers.

The 2018 Breitbart News Fake News Awards.  Until you actually take the time to research the amount of lies and lies and lies the establishment media deliberately spread, you can't begin to fathom just how bad things are.  By the time I was done going through the entire year, I literally, no joke, had 11 pages of headlines to choose from for these awards.


Timely news and commentary:
This is an original compilation, Copyright © 2024 by Andrew K. Dart

Revoke the media's License to Lie.  60 years ago, the liberal Supreme Court in 1965 gave the press a License to Lie in the NYT v.  Sullivan case in which the Times ran a libelous ad by civil rights activists against police in Birmingham, Alabama.  The court said, well, unless NYT meant actual malice, the libel was not a libel.  Despite this iron wall, President Trump sued George Stephanopoulos and Disney's ABC for one billion dollars.  Rather than make Stephanopoulos face deposition this week, the network agreed on Saturday to pay $15 million to Trump and a million to his lawyers, and make its No. 1 news reader apologize on the air.  After six decades of not being held liable for libel, corporate media knows Clarence Thomas and Sam Alito are itching to overturn Sullivan and revoke that License to Lie.

Is It Any Wonder That No Sane Person Takes Fact Checks Seriously?  Making fun of Pravda media "fact checks" is, perhaps, a little too easy at times.  But doing so is a good reminder of just how distorted their worldview is.  Without being reminded, we might fall into the bad habit of taking these people more seriously than they deserve.  [Advertisement]  [Tweet]  The Politifact "fact check" on conservative complaints (I'm pretty sure that the complaints are more "common sense" than conservative) that aid to Africa has nothing to do with aid to North Carolina is a perfect example of how the government hypnotized think.  Having worked in government and around politicians, I can assure you that from the perspective of the bureaucratically minded, the dissociation between spending in one area and that of another is indeed totally disconnected.  People in government think in terms of bureaucratic fiefdoms, and the budget of one fiefdom is in a different universe than that of any other.

Some of the lies the mainstream media and liberal politicians are demanding we believe.  There is an epidemic of white police officers killing unarmed black men, we must block the puberty of children born in the wrong bodies to prevent them from killing themselves, the Russians control Trump through a sex blackmail operation, the Covid vaccine prevents infection, millions or billions will die from starvation and harsh weather from climate change, there's no way a Covid virus could have escaped from a lab, mass migration improves societies with no trade-offs, it's best for addicts if we give them hard drugs to use in special sites downtown, we need the government to fight misinformation online in order to save democracy, Biden is sharper than ever, Kamala is 100% prepared to be president, and anyone who disagrees is racist, sexist, and/or fascist.  While many Americans are increasingly and at least partially aware that all of the above are lies, we are still a long way from coming to grips with their enormity, their monstrous consequences, and the totalitarian ways in which the mainstream news media, many employers, and governments demanded that we believe them.  [Tweet with video clip]

Harris Campaign Advisor David Plouffe Accidently Exposes How Legacy Media Lied to the American People With Junk Polls.  There have been extensive postmortems on Kamala Harris's failed campaign and the absolute drubbing she received from Donald Trump.  Democrat strategist James Carville said the moment he knew the campaign was doomed was when 'The View' co-host Sunny Hostin asked Harris, "If anything, would you have done something differently than President Biden during the past four years?"  Kamala answered, "There is not a thing that comes to mind."  But legacy media keep gaslighting voters with polls showing Harris neck and neck with Trump and even leading in some surprising places.

An epidemic of lies.  [Scroll down]  Fortunately, people have noticed and it looks like we've all had enough.  Americans don't like being lied to.  Our trust in our own government and the media have been declining for years and we're increasingly turning to independent sources.  MSNBC and CNN have reportedly lost a large portion of their viewership, and rumors abound that Elon Musk may even purchase the former.

The 2024 Presidential Election Landslide.  The people are not stupid, despite what the self-styled "elites" believe.  Ordinary working folks are trying to raise families and earn a living.  They don't have the time to be fully versed in day-to-day politics.  In the past, they've relied on the legacy media to report objectively.  It is clear, though, that in the 2024 election, the people rejected what the legacy media was spinning.  The legacy media abdicated their responsibility to educate, inform, and report the day's news objectively and fairly.  They failed in their role as a watchdog to serve as a check on government abuse of power.  The legacy media devolved into an activist partisan organ that parrots the talking points of the Marxist left and government.  Media outlets both outright lied and concealed information from the people without any remorse.  The legacy media gaslighted the people for "wrong" thinking when challenged by common sense critiques and questions.

Media Describes Muslim Terrorist as "Homeless Florida Man".  Harun Abdul-Malik Yener considered joining ISIS, had been looking into bombmaking since 2017 and boasted, "I feel like Bin Laden."  So clearly this is a Florida homeless man problem.  And not another Muslim terrorist problem.

No one should believe economists — they are apologists for bad policies.  This article in USA Today is so full of misinformation that it's hard to know where to start.  They work very hard to absolve Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, and their policies for the rapid rise in inflation — but the actual evidence shows how responsible they really are. [...] Foremost, these economists blame the pandemic for the inflation, but looking back at the data reveals that inflation stayed somewhere below 2% for the year of the pandemic (2020) before Biden was even in — it was 1.4% when Biden actually took office, and had remained low even with all the stimulus that was approved during Trump's last year of his first term.  Next, they intentionally lie that Biden-Harris policies brought the country out of the downturn.  The economy was soaring prior to Biden taking office.  The recession was the shortest ever, ending two months after it started in April 2020.  For the next eight months of 2020, jobs were coming back at over 1.6 million per month and yet the inflation rate was still 1.4%.  Next, they falsely try to deflect blame for the high inflation to Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine, which occurred in February of 2022.  This is so easy to disprove, it is laughable that anyone believes it.  The price of oil, which affects everything, started soaring as soon as Biden got in because Biden campaigned on destroying the oil and natural gas industries.

Some Democrats Are Admitting They Lied Before The Election.  [Scroll down]  Before the election, no media leftist would dare to have said anything of the sort.  It was all, "Crime is down," even though the books had been cooked by not having the statistics from the largest Democrat-controlled cities in the country where the crime problem lives.  They knew it, but they insisted otherwise anyway because they wanted to win.  Illegal aliens committed fewer crimes than we stinking Americans, they insisted, even though the collection of data on the immigration status of criminals was forbidden in blue states, making it impossible to prove.  That also made it impossible to disprove, which was the point.  "Migrants are a boon to the economy," they cried while demanding more money from the federal government to help support these bipedal economic stimulus packages that were starting to bankrupt city budgets with their "economic growth."

Here Lies the Mainstream Media.  On Tuesday night, roughly 72 million Americans buried the reeking carcass once called "legacy media." [...] Trust in the news outlets that were, many ages ago, the hallmark of integrity and investigation has plummeted — steeply.  Why?  Because we found out that the mainstream media has been lying.  When it became blatantly obvious to much of the nation that Biden may, in fact, be suffering from cognitive decline, memory lapses, and possibly even dementia or Parkinson's, mainstream media covered it up, as they had covered it up for years.  ABC News even offered the sitting president an opportunity to persuade voters on air that he was fit as a fiddle.  When Harris took Biden's place as the Democratic presidential candidate, mainstream media rushed to downplay her extreme, left-wing record.  When the vice president sat down for an interview on CBS News's famous "60 Minutes" program, the news team apparently doctored the recorded interview, cutting and pasting Harris's incoherent answers to match questions that might make more sense to viewers.

How media fails.  Of all the institutions that have failed us in past years, none has been worse than the media. [...] The total lack of reporting and curiosity about what was really going on at the southern border was beyond the pale.  The flow of 10 to 20 million illegal immigrants was barely reported for three years until, again, the ramifications were becoming evident to too many people.  Where were the nightly photos of immigrants from some very dangerous places flooding over the Rio Grande?  If you looked at a few conservative outlets you were aware of it.  If you only looked at the traditional media, you weren't.  They just reported the obvious misinformation coming from the administration that the border was secure.  We should demand better from the press.  They can't understand why the public holds them in such low esteem but they have earned the current lack of trust.

Whom Should the Media Blame for Harris's Defeat?  [Scroll down]  In all of these discussions, the media do not point to a prominent element common to each of the perceived problems: the media themselves.  Of course, the media were too compromised by partisan motives to report what they had known for most of Biden's term: he clearly suffered from advanced dementia.  As Axios political reporter Hans Nichols recently noted on Fox's America's Newsroom, the media came down hard on any reporter who proposed a well sourced story on Biden's lack of acuity, because that would help Trump.  Publicizing this infirmity would have had several salutary results.  Obviously, as all disappointed Democrats now appear to admit, Biden should have dropped out of the race earlier.  But the same media relaying this judgment do not point a finger at themselves for aiding and abetting his clueless clinging to power.

Say, What Happened To 'Closest Election In History'?  For months running up to the Nov. 5 election, the "experts" told us that this would be the closest in history.  Over and over again they said it.  Always with great certainty.
    "This could be the closest presidential election since 1876"
    "Uncertainty reigns in an election closer 'than any I have ever seen'"
    "Kamala Harris vs. Donald Trump is the closest presidential race of the century"
    "2024 Election Is The Closest Presidential Race In At Least 60 Years: Polls"
    "Coping with election-related anxiety in a razor-thin race"
    "Razor-thin race between Harris and Trump should motivate Democrats ahead of Election Day"
    "Dead-heat poll results are astonishing — and improbable, these experts say"
    "America's dead-heat Trump-Harris election"
    "Poll shows presidential race in dead heat"
Turns out, it wasn't close at all.  Trump is currently ahead by 3.5 points in the popular vote.  That will tighten as the millions of votes in deep-blue states such as California, Washington, and Oregon continue to be counted, but if it holds it will be the first time since 2004 that a GOP candidate won the popular vote and only the second time since 1988.  But unless you failed civics class, you'd know that we don't elect presidents by national popular vote.  And if Nevada, Arizona, and Michigan end up in the Trump camp — he's currently leading in all three states plus Alaska — Trump will end up with 312 electoral votes.

2024's Biggest Loser Is The Corporate Media Industrial Complex.  In the early hours of Wednesday morning, legacy news networks were already sliding toward 2016 levels of melting down about the increasingly definite prospect of a presidential victory by Donald J. Trump.  For them, Harris' stinging defeat is personal — because it's just as much a defeat for them as it is for her.  The corporate media industrial complex has spent Donald Trump's entire political career trying to destroy him.  Hand-in-hand with triple-letter government agencies and Democrats, they ran a hoax painting Trump as a Russian stooge based on ridiculous rumors commissioned by his opponent's campaign in 2016.  They continued to spread the lie for the duration of his presidency, awarding each other Pulitzers for it.  And they've only ramped up their efforts since then.  The problem they're reckoning with tonight is this:  those efforts didn't work.  They're no longer able to control Americans by controlling their information intake, because their credibility is farther deep-sixed than the Clinton family's enemies list.

Media Misinformation Undermines Our Democracy.  Have you ever wondered why the media seems to feel so emboldened when broadcasting unfounded claims about public figures like Donald Trump, as if they're shielded from any consequence?  The answer lies in a questionable Supreme Court decision from 1964 — NY Times v.  Sullivan — which established a novel and radical interpretation of the First Amendment that has, for six decades, let media outlets slander public figures with impunity.  The Constitution guarantees freedom of speech, yes, but nowhere in its text does it explicitly allow the press to defame individuals without consequence.  Yet in 1964, in a 9-0 decision authored by Justice William Brennan, a Supreme Court dominated by activist judges established a precedent without clear constitutional grounding, declaring that public figures could only succeed in defamation suits if they could prove "actual malice" — that is, that the media knowingly lied or acted with reckless disregard for the truth.  The justices defined this standard of "actual malice" in a way that makes it exceedingly difficult for any public figure to win a defamation case.

Fight! Fight!  Fight!  Vs. Fake, Fake, Fake.  In the place of news that greatly matters, the propaganda press has filled the airwaves with demonstrable lies in the days leading up to the election.  Fake journalists lie about President Trump taking away birth control and forcing women to have babies against their will.  After covering up Joe Biden's dementia for years, they now lie about Donald Trump showing fake signs of fatigue.  They parrot the FBI's fake crime statistics and lie to Americans about the safety of their communities.  They parrot the CDC's fake COVID statistics and lie to Americans about the success of lockdowns, mask mandates, and fake vaccines.  They parrot fake jobs reports and lie to Americans about economic growth.  Despite the fact that Kamala Harris has the lowest approval rating for any modern vice president, our fake journalists lie to Americans about her remarkable popular appeal.  And after mocking President Trump for being the victim of two separate assassination attempts, the propaganda press now pushes the lie that his words somehow threaten RINO Liz Cheney's life.  The Deep State spews blatant lies, and the propaganda press treats those blatant lies as irrefutable truths.

Here's A List Of Every Garbage Journalist Who Lied About Trump's Liz Cheney Chickenhawk Comments.  Democrats' propaganda press is completely lying about comments Trump made about neocon and former Rep. Liz Cheney in an interview with Tucker Carlson.  Trump called Cheney a "radical war hawk" and pointed out how easy it is to make decisions about the lives of American troops when you are sitting in a cozy, insulated office and have no sense of how it feels on the field of battle to face the life and death consequences of decisions made in Washington.  "Let's put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her.  Let's see how she feels about it, you know, when the guns are trained on her face," Trump said.  "You know, they're all war hawks when they're sitting in Washington, in a nice building saying, 'Oh, gee, well, let's send — let's send 10,000 troops right into the mouth of the enemy.'"  Anyone with a basic grasp of English and a bit of context understands what Trump was conveying.

Corporate Media's Shameless Liz Cheney Hoax Is What Real 'Disinformation' Looks Like.  One of the most powerful and corrupt players in American politics is spreading a sensational lie to manipulate voters four days before the final day of voting in the 2024 presidential election.  The lie is that Donald Trump threatened to execute dynastic war hawk Liz Cheney by firing squad, and the culprit is America's propaganda press.  Anyone who watches the clip of what Trump said will discern that he was obviously suggesting Cheney pick up a rifle and join the thousands of young Americans she's sent overseas to fight in forever wars.  Anyone who interprets it differently is either lying or so stupid he should take a lifelong vow of silence starting today.  "She's a radical war hawk," Trump said of Cheney on Thursday night.  "Let's put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her, OK?  Let's see how she feels about it, you know, when the guns are trained on her face.  You know, they're all war hawks when they're sitting in Washington in a nice building saying, 'Oh gee ... let's send 10,000 troops right into the mouth of the enemy.'"  Cheney, beside herself at the thought of having to do what she asks young American men and women to do, ripped the first half of Trump's comment from its context and claimed Trump had "threaten[ed]" her "with death."  The corporate media didn't issue one of their infamous "fact" "checks" or call Cheney out for her disinformation.  They quickly joined in on the lie that Trump had "fantasized" about putting Cheney in front of a firing squad.

You Are Forewarned:  If Kamala Harris Loses, the Democrats Will Try to Kill Free Speech ASAP.  Upon being badly trounced in a national election, members of the losing party have one of two choices:  They can be introspective, take a long, hard look at themselves in the mirror, and undergo an honest, no-holds-barred critique of all their missteps, poor tactics, and ineffective messaging.  Or they can lie to themselves.  Candid, unflinching self-analysis is torturous.  It puts you face-to-face with your own failings; there's nowhere to hide, nowhere else to point the finger.  And in a presidential campaign with thousands of people, hundreds of regions, and countless moving parts, it also requires you to hold your team members accountable.  Which is why lying is so popular!  Whenever the media talks about lying, they always portray it in a negative light.  (What gives?)  Because when you really stop and think about it, lying is a GREAT way to make people believe something that's totally untrue!

Trump Is Right.  There Is an 'Enemy Within' the United States.  [Scroll down]  The idea that those people might try to use violence to impact the election is so realistic that it should be considered probable, especially if it's close.  Funnier still is the idea that "Trump would use the military against his enemies on election day," since that's what the question was about — election day violence.  Donald Trump, win or lose, will not be President on election day.  I realize reality has no impact on the pearl-clutching class on Morning Joe, but for everyone else that should be an important factoid.  While the goon squad mob on the left are undoubtedly an enemy within our country, so too is the left-wing industrial complex that props it up.  The media — so-called journalists — people who coined and echoed the phrase "mostly peaceful" as people's lives were destroyed, businesses were destroyed and dozens were murdered.  Anyone who could look at that and turn an indifferent eye has something broken in them nothing will fix.

Laura Loomer Files $150 Million Defamation Lawsuit Against Bill Maher After He Suggests Secret Trump Affair.  Laura Loomer filed a $150 million lawsuit against Bill Maher and HBO after the comedian made comments suggesting that Loomer "might be" having a secret affair with former President Donald Trump.  The lawsuit filed on Tuesday argues that Maher falsely claimed Loomer was in an "arranged relationship" with Trump, during a "Real Time" talk show taping on September 13th. [...]  [Tweet with video clip]  Loomer has accused Maher of making the false statements with "malice" while causing her significant personal and professional harm.  Loomer's lawsuit goes on to assert that the allegations are "baseless" and "fabricated for attention, notoriety, clicks, and profit."  She also claims that Maher made disparaging remarks in a subsequent segment on the comedic political talk show, titled "24 things you didn't know about Laura Loomer."

Did The New York Times Publish a Hoax?  I am not a ballistics expert and don't play one on TV.  I didn't even sleep in a Holiday Inn Express, so what I write here is based entirely on the analysis of others.  [Advertisement]  But I am pretty sure they are right, given the balance of the evidence and the provenance of the opinion piece published by the New York Times.  [Tweet]  At issue is a piece published by the Times in which 65 medical personnel who have worked in Gaza during the Israeli operation accuse soldiers of deliberately targeting Gazan children, shooting them in the head.  There are lurid stories and X-ray images that purport to show bullets lodged in the head and neck of children.  Those X-rays appear to be — according to doctors and ballistics experts — totally fake.  And even I, a layman, can [challenge] them due to obvious problems that a 10-year-old can spot.  Look at the linked photos in the above tweet, and you will immediately notice a few things:  there are no entry or exit wounds, despite the claim that a military rifle supposedly shot these children with a bullet designed to penetrate armor.  The bullets show no deformation and appear to have been placed under the body.

4 Years After The Biden Laptop Coverup, Media Election Interference Is Worse Than Ever.  Just last week, CBS News used deceptive video splicing to replace one of Democrat presidential candidate Kamala Harris' answers on "60 Minutes" with one that sounded less awful.  A preview clip of the interview showed Harris responding to a question with nonsensical babble, but when the full interview aired, that answer was nowhere to be seen, having been replaced by a completely different response.  The original answer was also missing from the transcript released by the network, and CBS continues to refuse to release an undoctored transcript.  The most outrageous election interference from the press this cycle might be the pile-up on Trump by ABC News "moderators" when Trump met Harris for a singular presidential debate in September.  They lobbed "fact checks" at Trump left and right while refusing to question Harris' many falsehoods.  Throughout the debate, the format resembled ABC's David Muir and Linsey Davis asking Trump to explain how he could possibly be so horrible and then giving Harris a chance to opine on whether she thought Trump was horrible and why.

They Are Lying To You About Hurricane Helene.  After what we have just witnessed, how will anyone be able to trust those that are running the country ever again?  Hurricane Helene's extremely unusual journey left an immense trail of destruction that was more than 500 miles long, and there are many communities that were completely and utterly wiped out.  Authorities are telling the mainstream media that only a few hundred people died, and so that is what the mainstream media is telling us.  But those that are on the ground in the areas that got hit the hardest are telling us a completely different story.  For example, one woman in Asheville, North Carolina says that thousands of people are missing and that there are still "bodies hanging from trees they haven't gotten to yet" [...] Another local woman is claiming that there are more than 900 bodies at a local hospital in Asheville which still have not been identified[.] [...] Please keep in mind that Asheville is just one of the cities that was absolutely devastated by this storm.  There are hundreds of others that are dealing with dead bodies as well.

Hilarious job numbers from the Bureau of Labor.  As the media campaign so vigorously for Democrats and cheer how great the Biden-Harris policies have been, suddenly, the Department of Labor comes out with an unemployment report that blows away expectations.  Biden and Harris were out bragging as a significant number of people still can't pay their bills without running up new debt or going delinquent on the debt they already had.  Supposedly, 254,000 jobs were created in September.  Isn't that amazing, that this report came out one month before the election?  Of course, the media gave the headline number and never got into the details.  Here is one important detail:  government jobs showed a gain of 785,000 because of the second biggest seasonal adjustment on record.  (It is easy to manipulate numbers when you have "seasonal adjustments.")  This would mean that private-sector employment declined 531,000 with seasonal adjustments.  I would say that is not too much to brag about.  Somehow, the voters don't get to see that number, but they know that the economy has sucked the past four years because they can't pay their bills.

The Democrats Defraud the Voters With A Little Help From Their Friends.  In 2016 the Democrats fabricated the Trump-Russian collusion hoax.  That's far more serious than lying about how a politician voted years ago.  The CIA furthered this lie by enlisting foreign security agencies to generate contacts between Russians and peripheral Trump campaign members to create suspicion against Trump.  After the election, the Democrats used the same fabrication to hamstring Trump's administration and try to drive him from office.  The CIA issued false leaks to the MSM claiming growing evidence of Trump-Russian collusion.  The MSM eagerly published stories day after day claiming "the walls were closing in" on Trump.  But the walls were not closing in.  The claim was a lie.  The MSM is so brazen that when New York Times and Washington Post reporters were awarded Pulitzers for their falsehoods, they proudly kept them even as their falsehoods were exposed.

BBC blames child marriage in Bangladesh on climate change.  WHATEVER the BBC report on climate change, it is pretty good advice to assume the opposite is true!  BBC World Service broadcasts a weekly radio programme called The Climate Question.  A couple of weeks ago the topic was child marriage in Bangladesh, with the claim that extreme weather 'fuelled by climate change' was making farming impossible in many parts of the Bangladesh.  Consequently people were moving off the land and into towns.  As a result, supposedly, young girls were being married off.  But far from farming becoming impossible, the opposite is the case.  Cereal production continues to rise every year to new records, and the area harvested is also increasing.  To cap it all, poverty levels have declined by a factor of eight since the 1980s.  Bangladesh is a success story, but you won't hear that from the BBC.  Everything the BBC has reported is a lie.  They obviously have a problem with admitting the truth about child brides in Muslim countries, so why not blame it all on global warming instead?

On State Department Censorship and Blacklisting.  Last Friday, Josh Christenson at the New York Post published "State Department tried to discredit reporters, Republican pol over conservative 'blacklist.'"  The article described an internal memo showing the State Department strategizing public relations responses to the Washington Examiner's Gabe Kaminsky, me, and Republican congressman Jim Banks.  The memo criticizes Banks in an extremely devious way.  The Indiana Republican last February was quoted by Gabe in the Examiner saying the Biden administration appeared to be "knee deep" in efforts to "crack down" on speech.  The State Department memo listed the Banks quote among its list of criticisms to answer.  However, the agency didn't quote the Examiner.  It claimed to be quoting the Russian news agency RIA-Novosti, giving the impression that Banks offered his criticism of Biden in Russian state media:  [Exhibit]  But Banks never spoke to RIA-Novosti, or any Russian agency.  His quotes only appear in wholesale Russian translations (read: thefts) of Gabe's Examiner article. [...] A miffed Banks just responded with a letter to Secretary of State Anthony Blinken.  "The State Department, in defense of its domestic so-called 'disinformation' operation, purposefully spread disinformation about a U.S. lawmaker," he wrote, adding that "this is a sloppy and hypocritical lie and it is typical of the Biden-Harris State Department's repeated attacks on the First Amendment."

The New Yorker Doesn't Care About Facts When They're Making [Stuff] Up About Trump.  Perhaps no period in modern journalism has exposed major structural problems in the media as the Trump era.  Since Trump careened into American politics in 2016, reporters have thrown story after story trying to ensnare Trump with Russia's Putin.  Many of these stories never held up to honest inquiry.  As investigative journalist Jeff Gerth examined in scrupulous detail — a 24,000 word, three part series, in the Columba Journalism Review to be exact — top American journalists misled the public while claiming to cover Trump fairly, dispassionately, and — most important — accurately.  Gerth notes that some of these reporters went on to win awards for their failed Trump stories.  You likely haven't read Gerth's series in Columbia Journalism Review (CJR) and that's for good cause.  Many journalists who wrote misleading stories on Trump refused to speak with Gerth, likely because they'd be hard pressed to defend dubious articles that led to coveted journalism prizes and promotions.

The second assassination attempt was not 'apparent'.  Everywhere I look for news updates on the Trump assassination attempt I'm confronted by the word "apparent."  Headlines all over legacy media (my browser's cache was chockful of them) disseminate variations of "Trump's apparent assassination attempt..."  Up until at least 0930 PST, the day after.  My goodness, the would-be assassin is a Dem donkey's ass-assin, without the wit to repugn the verbal violence from Dem asses against President Trump.  That's apparent, but his acting out is manifest.  The ass-assin wasn't out there shooting birdies with his AK-47 from the out-of-bounds rough on the golf course.  There was nothing "apparent" about it — his intentions (corroborated by his social media profile) were bleedin' obvious.

That media 'narrative' about pets going uneaten by Haitian migrants in Ohio is starting to fall apart.  Yes, they're getting eaten.  ABC News debate moderator David Muir made a big deal of "fact-checking" President Trump when he cited reports at last night's debate that pets were being eaten by Haitian migrants in Springfield, Ohio, whose flooding 20,000-strong presence was creating many problems for the city of 58,000. [...] Well, now it turns out that Muir the self-appointed fact-checker who cited a city manager's claim that he didn't get any reports about it didn't know what he was talking about.  President Trump, however, did.  Reports from a wide variety of sources are starting to emerge about pets and park wildlife such as ducks and geese being stolen, dismembered, chopped, cooked, eaten and used for bizarre voudou ceremonies to summon evil spirits by Haitian migrants, some of them flown in from Haiti by as "parolees" by Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.

It is a joke when journalists claim they care about journalistic integrity.  A media that spread lies about Russian collusion for years with no evidence does not have integrity.  Journalists who buried the story about the Hunter Biden laptop and Biden family corruption as they campaigned for Joe is not honest.  They have known that the Biden family pockets were lined with kickbacks for years but continue to perpetuate the lie that Joe was not involved and did nothing wrong.  Journalists who have spread the lie for fourteen years that the Affordable Care Act makes health care cheaper while prices have skyrocketed are just Democrat campaign workers.  Anyone who pretends that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are moderates is intentionally spreading misinformation to voters.  No matter what Joe said or did during his first three and a half years in office, the complicit media claimed that he was an excellent president and sharp as a tack.  They continued this lie until the debate.  Journalists who continued to say that Kamala was a drag on the ticket now say she is fabulous.  That is not honesty.

Newspaper article preposterously equates KKK members with Christianity, patriotism.  No matter how much you disdain and despise the mainstream media[,] it is not enough.  Not nearly enough.  Case in point: the newly rebranded "Minnesota Star Tribune" recently ran an article — on the front page of the 'A' section — about the history of the KKK in Minnesota.  The headline read "Her mission:  Documenting history of KKK in Minnesota."  Clever.  The piece never mentioned the Democrat party, never once noted that the party was the home of the KKK, the pro-slavery party, the Jim Crow party, the anti-integration party, the anti-reconstruction party.  Misinformation.  Disinformation.  Mal-information.  Lying by omission.  Shameful.  Instead, the article hinted throughout that it was those with the mindset of today's Trump Republicans that were responsible for the horrors of extreme discrimination.

The Los Angeles Times blames Republicans for California's woes.  One of the hallmarks of narcissism is that when things go wrong, it's always someone else's fault.  Being a narcissist means never having to say you're sorry.  Nothing more perfectly illustrates this truism than an essay from yesterday's Los Angeles Times blaming Republicans for California's myriad woes.  While the author is correct that, when Republicans had the chance, they didn't make smart decisions, the reality is that it's the Democrats who have led California to the desperate place it's in now.  Steve Lopez's essay doesn't make the mistake of blaming Republicans for all the state's problems.  He concedes that Democrats have long controlled the former Golden State, which is plagued by homelessness, crime, out-of-control housing costs, and poverty.  He contends, however, "that none of that happened overnight, nor did it happen exclusively under Democratic leadership."  Lopez believes that Republican mismanagement during the times that Republicans controlled the government is as much to blame as Democrat mismanagement.  The easy challenge to that argument is that, since 1970, the legislature has had a Democrat majority, which became a vetoproof supermajority in 2018.

MSM tells only part of the story, highlights 'record number of deaths' from 'climate change'.  The Hill recently ran an article by Zack Budryk, which highlighted the "record number of Americans killed by heat" last year; here's what he had to say:  ["]Extreme heat killed more Americans in 2023 than any other year over nearly a quarter century of records, according to research published Monday in the Journal of the American Medical Association.  At least 2,325 people died from the heat last year, according to the study, which included deaths with heat as both an underlying and contributing factor.["]  If you didn't already figure it out, this piece was on "climate change," and its purpose, like most pieces on climate change, is to get people to capitulate to the radical green agenda.  Why don't journalists ever report on the number of people killed each year by extreme cold, which is much higher than heat deaths?  The answer is that facts don't matter when the media and other Democrats are trying to force people to surrender to their agenda.

The Media Lies Add Up.  During the 2020 Democratic primaries, the general election, and throughout the first three years of the Biden administration, it was evident that Joe Biden was physically and mentally incapable of serving as president.  Yet his aides and the media all misled the American people.  They insisted that Biden was vigorous and sharp.  Then suddenly in June 2024, within a 24-hour period, Biden was declared by these same insiders as unfit to continue as the Democratic nominee.  Their new problem with Biden was not just his long-standing embarrassing dementia.  Rather bad polls increasingly warned that voters no longer believed their lies and thus would likely not reelect Biden but would instead punish most Democrats in the upcoming 2024 election.  So, a new media narrative arose:  the once-hale Biden was forced to resign as the Democrat nominee.  His once widely caricatured vice president, Kamala Harris, just as abruptly was coronated as his replacement candidate by an equally suddenly gushing and colluding media.  In sum, for some nine years, the media and the left have successfully fed the country a succession of rank deceptions and conspiracies.

Hiding Danchenko.  Rolling Stone magazine has just published a hugely perfidious puff piece about Steele dossier source, Igor Danchenko.  Even by the standards of media puff pieces, the article is notable for the sheer amount of misrepresentations of basic facts.  Among many other falsehoods, it misstates how the FBI found out about Danchenko and fails to acknowledge that the FBI paid him several hundred thousand dollars.  Most notably, the article attempts to revive the notion that the dossier was credible, while omitting the crucial detail that Danchenko himself disavowed the dossier in January 2017.  However, what particularly caught our attention was the timing of the piece.  There seemed to be no apparent reason to publish such an article now, several years after Danchenko faded from public view.  Why the need to remind everyone of this deeply sordid chapter in American history?  Every time the media publishes a puff piece for no apparent reason, we must assume they are attempting to preempt some negative news.  But what could this negative news be?

Minnesota news station conveniently "loses connection" when state senator starts ripping them for being Tim Walz puppets.  No "state-run media" happening here folks.  It's just Minnesota's incredibly Democrat- and Tim Walz-friendly media having "technical difficulties" the moment anyone challenges their neutrality.  Check this out:  [Tweet with video clip] [...] I'm not sure that North Korean media could be this blatantly corrupt.  Before the cut, Senator Jensen got some great blows in.  I can't imagine the panic going on in the newsroom when they  cut  lost the feed.

The Editor says...
I worked in broadcasting for 48 years, much of the time occupied in establishing "live shot" signals for remote pickup links, and I can assure you that live feeds of this sort, from a fixed point of origination, NEVER fail without some advance warning (as in this case), except when someone manually kills the feed.  If a signal is about to drop, there's usually some disturbance in the video or audio before they both disappear.  Not this time.  You can safely surmise this was not a case of "technical difficulties" beyond the station's control.  The feed was obviously cut because the Republican politician was developing momentum and had to be stopped, as if the TV station is owned and operated by socialist Democrats.

Mainstream media misinformation, mendacity at PBS.  PBS recently reported that, via a phone call, former President Trump urged Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to delay a hostage deal between Israel and Hamas until after the 2024 presidential election to benefit himself politically.  Turns out, that wasn't true.  In any way, shape, or form.  Knock me over with a feather.  Imagine my surprise when I found out that this, too, was a lie made out of whole cloth!  "PBS NewsHour"  propagandist  reporter Judy Woodruff subsequently apologized for reporting the story about Trump and Netanyahu "that both leaders have staunchly denied," according to Fox News.

Fear and Trembling in the Deep State.  During the [DNC convention in Chicago], Judy Woodruff reported (using the most authoritative voice and concerned visage she could muster) that Donald Trump had a telephone conversation with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during which he told him to reject the Biden ceasefire deal because accepting it would help Biden's reelection.  Both Netanyahu and Trump denied the claim upon which Trump was instantly being charged by the usual shills with a violation of the Logan Act.  When pressed to substantiate her charge, Woodruff "clarified" her remarks and said she'd relied on accounts in Axios and Reuters and had done no independent verification.  In fact, neither publication reported what she had said was the content of the conversation.  More damaging to the credibility of her "clarification," days before her assertion both accounts had reported the men denied having any phone conversation regarding the proposal.  Did she misread the articles?  I think it obvious she repeated something someone in the administration told her, someone whose identity she dares not reveal for fear of losing valuable access.

Fake News:  Judy Woodruff does a Dan Rather.  [Scroll down]  The [worst] element of Woodruff's statement, that Trump urged Netanyahu to reject the ceasefire because it would help Harris in the 2024 presidential campaign — never happened at all in either report, not even by wink, hint, or suggestion, not in the corrected or uncorrected versions.  Nothing.  Zilch.  Zero.  Nada.  Trump never did that.  And they never reported that.  Trump wouldn't even need to do that, as Bibi already knows which presidential candidate would be better for Israel.  I knew that claim was fake the minute I read it and put on my skepticism goggles.  It was completely made up by Woodruff.  Yet here Woodruff is, blaming other news agencies for her own error, focusing on some mild to moderately fuzzy elements of the stories open to interpretation, and making a blanket claim that Trump is busy interfering with the peace process in Gaza by phone, and for only the most venal and selfish reasons, to advance his presidential campaign, when nothing of the kind happened nor was ever reported to have happened.

No, illegal immigration does not help the U.S. economy.  The media and other Democrats have been working very hard to say that Kamala has not been responsible for the open border policy that allows millions of illegals, including terrorists and gang members, to flood our country.  Sanctuary cities and states have been whining continuously about Texas sending these illegals to them and begging Gov. Greg Abbott to stop.  They are complaining about how much these illegals are costing and how they are running out of room.  They are begging the federal government for money.  The voters aren't buying these lies so now the Los Angeles Times comes to the rescue with a fictional piece of trash describing how great these illegals have been for the country.  Of course, they don't use the term 'illegal' in their article.

The Guardian Newspaper Says "Two-Tier Policing" Is a Myth Following Years of Making That Exact Claim.  The riots in the United Kingdom have brought the concept of two-tier policing into the limelight once again as the government seems more concerned in targeting those protesting against the consequences of mass immigration than actual criminals.  As we reported earlier, U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has promised a crackdown on rioters with "standing armies" of police officers and 24-hour turnarounds in the courts.  His focus, however, on right-wing rioters has leant itself to the nickname "two-tier Keir."  When it was Brits rioting over the death of George Floyd, a man who didn't even live on the same continent as them, Starmer said "Like you, I was shocked and angered at the killing of George Floyd, and the response of President Trump and the US authorities to the peaceful protesters, to people rightly demanding justice, has been an affront to humanity.

Liberal Gaslighting Goes Global.  The problem with many liberals is they can't live in their own truth.  They abandon ship as soon as it becomes inconvenient to maintain their current persona.  The most obvious and telling recent examples come from the Democrat Presidential candidate-by-fiat, Kamala Harris.  For the last three and a half years, she was 'The Border Czar.'  Everyone knew it.  Biden announced it with much ballyhoo, and she was referred to as 'The Border Czar' by the television, print, and electronic media repeatedly.  As the Vice President, she ran interference for Joe Biden.  (He didn't create the huge border fiasco; she did.) [...] Any stain of failure, especially one tied to the massive disaster of the southern United States border, was a huge threat to her Presidential aspirations.  So, the Democrat political machine, together with their legacy media propaganda juggernaut, went full George Orwell on John Q. Public.  CNN, MSNBC, the New York Times, the New Yorker, Axios, and a score of other legacy media began trumpeting:  'Kamala Harris was never the Border Czar!'  Unfortunately for the gaslighters, and thanks to the internet, there are an abundance of records of them dubbing her with that title.

The Media Still Turn Tricks For The Democrat Party.  [Scroll down]  That's how business works.  Toe the line, or you're out!  The same can be said of all the self-important newscasters, anchors, and hosts whose media bosses quite literally give them their marching orders — or, more accurately, their talking orders.  Not just talking orders, but word-for-word memes, which is why no matter which lefty network or cable show you turn to, they're all using the same vocabulary, the same expressions, and the same keywords.  I first noticed this when Dick Cheney was chosen as George W. Bush's VP candidate.  Suddenly, the media talking heads discovered the word "gravitas"!  We still witness this echo chamber every day.  Objectivity has never been part of the media's agenda, only slavish obeisance to their bosses.  Watch for yourself.  In fact, take notes.  There is a remarkable absence of originality in today's political reportage.  It's all an echo chamber of talking points and leftist propaganda that the anchors and reporters have received beforehand and have literally been commanded to utilize at the risk of their jobs.  There's not an original word, phrase, or sentence!

Turns Out We Were Right:  Dems Were Playing The Long Con.  Back in February, we noticed a spate of articles claiming that there was no way that Joe Biden would not be the Democrats' nominee.  "In the span of two days," we wrote, "articles started appearing making the exact same argument:  That Joe Biden will definitely, no questions asked, be the nominee come November."  We noticed that these articles — all written by supposed political pros — made the same argument:
  •   It's too late for Biden to step aside.
  •   Party elites are all behind Biden.
  •   There's no way Biden would ever drop out.
  •   Nobody wants Kamala Harris to be the nominee.
Horsefeathers, we said, Democrats' only interest is in defeating Donald Trump and keeping power, and they will do whatever it takes to achieve that. [...] Today's mainstream journalists are the domestic version of Baghdad Bob.  The public must learn to start treating them that way.

Slow news month.  [Scroll down]  What goes less noticed is the undisguised political bias of today's "news" media.  Pertinent information?  Nah!  They're in business just to further the partisan leftist agenda.  There is no longer the annual summer season, but rather a three-month severe heat wave.  Kamala Harris is certainly not a cackling nincompoop.  She's the most able holder of the destiny of civilization.  She's not some hack politician.  Instead, she's a "person of color" and of Asian descent... not to mention also a female human being.  This pandering is, of course, protected by the First Amendment.  What is not protected is the intangible concept of credibility.  It keeps getting harder and harder to take these sources seriously.

It's Hoaxes All the Way Down.  Since at least 2015 there is pretty much nothing we read in the mainstream media about politics that is unquestionably true.  That's not to say that nothing true has been printed.  You could produce reams of stories in which the basic facts are defensibly true, although you could probably produce many more reams in which many, most, or all of the facts were lies.  It's just that almost everything written about politics, medicine, public health, the border, Israel, and so many other major issues are driven by narratives completely unrelated to what is really going on.  From the Steele Dossier to "safe and effective," everything we are fed by the mainstream media is built on some hoax or another.

There Never Was A Mythical Time When 'The News Was Just the News'.  Freedom is messy.  As much as anyone, I'd love to have the news media simply present facts to American and world citizens in the form of easily digestible tidbits, allowing us to discern narratives and conclusions as individuals.  But that's simply never been the way that the news media worked in America or anyplace else.  Our Founders were brilliant men who weren't given to fantasies about utopia, and they were realists about the fallen condition of humankind.  You and I may foolishly imagine that it's possible to have a large, nationally syndicated news media that would be stalwartly objective and without projecting any sort of bias.  But the Founders recognized this as impossible.

The Attempted Assassination.  The mainstream media has abandoned their raison d'être:  to be an objective, independent source of information to keep citizens informed about societal matters.  In that scenario, better-educated citizens would join together to take action to support improved living conditions — e.g., by voting for responsible representatives.  Instead, the mainstream media has determined that citizens are incompetent and/or could care less, so they have appointed themselves as the judge and jury as to what needs to be done to improve society.  Of course, they never fully disclose their agendas, as that would expose the reality that they are bluff bidding on a bust hand.  That they continually attack an individual like Trump, is now just an everyday matter.  That they dishonestly portray him in numerous ways (e.g., Hitler), is so commonplace that we think little of it.  "Existential threat" rhetoric is not only false, but specifically intended to inflame[.]

To Call Them Journalists Is A Misnomer.  [Scroll down]  When you listen to the commentary on the mainstream media (the Left supporters) about an event you saw in person, you would think you were at different versions of the same.  An example is the assassination attempt of Donald Trump.  We heard the shots and saw the President grab his ear and drop to the stage for safety.  He reflexively knew to get down behind the bulletproof protection.  The Secret Service agents immediately surrounded him, but he quickly got up and pumped his fist to the crowd with blood streaming down his face.  According to CNN, the President was injured, not shot, and MSNBC said the President fell.  They did whatever they could to downplay the attempt to kill Donald Trump and the way he responded.  It is pathetic and obvious.

Here's How The Media Are Lying Right Now:  RNC Edition.  Now that Republicans have formally nominated Donald Trump for president and the party's convention went off this week without a hitch, it's a good time to check in on how the media processed these past few days.  Spoiler:  not well.

You May Think You Hate the Media, But You Can't Hate It Enough, Chapter 12,186.  When I first started seeing clueless mainstream media headlines pop up on Twitter Saturday afternoon I assumed most of them were fakes, attempts at bad satire, or the Babylon Bee trying to get ahead of things.  But no — these are real:  [Screenshots]

Leftist Media Downplays Trump Assassination Attempt.  Elements of the international media did an impeccable job of covering the attempted assassination of former U.S. president Donald Trump — an attack which also saw one person killed and two seriously injured.  To his credit, the BBC's senior North America correspondent Gary O'Donoghue conducted an insightful on-the-ground interview with a witness shortly after the gunshots rang out.  [Tweet with video clip]  Many have also praised the first-class photographers who potentially risked their lives to secure instantly iconic images that will be printed in the history books.  [Tweets]  Other elements acted shamefully, as readers would expect them too — either downplaying the seriousness of the event or putting a portion of the blame on Trump himself.  Even after footage had emerged which made it quite clear — even if on a very basic level — what had happened, various mainstream media publications pumped out such euphemistic headlines as these:
  CNN: "Secret Service Rushes Trump Off Stage After He Falls at Rally"
  USA Today: "Trump Removed From Stage by Secret Service After Loud Noises Startles Former President, Crowd"
  Associated Press: "Donald Trump Has Been Escorted Off The Stage During A Rally After Loud Noises Ring Out In The Crowd"
These and other headlines prompted recent Trump-backer Elon Musk to criticise the "legacy media" as "a pure propaganda machine."  [Tweet]

The Legacy Media Has Passed the Point of No Return.  A massive poll of 20,000 participants undertaken by the Knight Foundation and Gallup found that Americans' hope for and trust in an objective media was all but lost by 2020.  They saw not only an ever-growing partisanship in news reporting but a determination by the legacy media to push a political agenda instead of honestly disseminating the news.  This poll was one of the most devastating indictments of the media in polling history.  Some highlights:
  84% of surveyed Americans laid either a moderate or a great deal of the blame for partisan hostility at the feet of the media.
  Further, 82% believed news outlets are either deliberately "misrepresenting the facts" or are "making them up entirely".
  This is further amplified as 79% of those surveyed said media outlets are trying to persuade people to adopt a certain opinion about an issue or an individual.
  Similarly, while the respondents in the poll believed that the media is "critical" or "very important" to democracy, 86% say they have witnessed either a fair amount or a great deal of bias in news reporting.

This Won't Be The Last Time Democrats Attempt To Assassinate Trump.  It shouldn't be news by now but if it is:  These people aren't playing games. [...] Democrats and anti-Trumpers have spent the past three years calling the political opposition a life-or-death threat.  They claim they'll be imprisoned and people will die if their opposition gains power, while they themselves attempt to imprison and now kill the opposition.  They called him a fascist.  They called him a dictator.  They called him Hitler.  Literally the front page of New Republic magazine — still influential in Washington, believe it or not — this month portrayed Trump with a tiny mustache to drive home the point.  The vertigo you're feeling is normal.  We don't know yet much about the motives of the shooter.  Perhaps he was simply insane, though it's doubtful.  If he turns out to be politically motivated, there's nothing confusing or inexplicable about this even as news anchors will surely say in the coming days that "we all" bear blame.  We don't all bear blame.  This is one side acting out in fatal violence just as they did through 2020 and just as they did after Trump was elected in 2016.

Our Brezhnev, Our Pravda, Our Soviet Union.  [Scroll down]  Something similar has happened to a calcified America under President Joe Biden.  Like the late-stage Brezhnev, Biden is now a president in name only.  He has outsourced his administration to a vestigial hard-left apparat from the Obama years.  Now, Biden can no longer even perform his assigned ceremonial tasks of putting a moderate veneer on radical, nihilist agendas that are stagnating the country.  Yet our Pravda journalists have sworn to the American people that, in private, the reclusive, three-day-a-week Biden outpaces the energy and drive of those half his age.  Obsequious staffers plant stories in the Soviet-like ears of reporters about Biden's singular dynamism.  Any dissenters are publicly demonized as peddlers of "cheap fakes."  When Biden's reclusiveness prompts too much gossip that he is near senile, he is wheeled out for a staged interview that must be edited before release.  Or he answers questions secretly shown to him in advance.  On sporadic occasions where the state media and the Biden nomenklatura cannot control events — such as rare presidential debates or international summits — our Pravda media go into overdrive to convince the public that what they see and hear is not real.

The Loss of Political Trust.  Trump's epitaph must include credit for injecting "fake news" into the lexicon.  You are reading these words via alternative media born in response to the industrialization of fake news.  The news business is zero-sum.  Every lost NY Times or Washington Post subscriber becomes a Twitter, YouTube, Rumble, Gateway Pundit, etc. viewer.  The industry just experienced a staggering crisis of trust over the Biden coverup.  The overall financial implications of continuous erosion of trust in government have yet to be grasped.  For homework, online search:  fake+u.s.+government+economic+statistics.  Especially significant will be the coming de facto credit downgrading resulting from the Biden fiasco.  Credit is from the Latin credere, to believe.  Biden shines a spotlight on government/media lies of all flavors, awakening creditors to our extreme government trust deficit.

Milwaukee Radio Station Admits To Editing Interview With Joe Biden At Request Of White House.  Joe Biden participated in two radio interviews following his debate with Donald Trump, a debate that raised significant questions within the Democrat Party about the president's ability to win re-election.  The first interview was with WURD, an all-black radio station in Pennsylvania.  The host of the interview, Andrea Lawful-Sanders, admitted she asked the president questions sent to her from the White House.  The radio station fired Sanders later that week, acknowledging that agreeing to pre-determined questions jeopardized the credibility of the outlet.  The second interview was with CivicMedia, a progressive talk-radio network in Wisconsin.  The host of that interview, Earl Ingram, also confirmed that the White House supplied him with questions that he asked Biden. [...] In addition, the Wisconsin station published a press release on Thursday in which it admitted that it made two edits in an interview with Biden at the request of his campaign.

Reporters need to learn to apologize.  Two weeks ago, Georgetown University held a symposium about the state of journalism.  When asked what the main problem facing the press is, Erik Wemple, a media critic at the Washington Post, came up with a surprisingly compelling and honest answer:  Journalists need to learn how to apologize when they make mistakes. [...] Wemple has hit on something profound.  The media are not trusted, and all the conferences and articles in the world are not going to help them out of their hole.

The Editor says...
Lying is probably the news media's most common "mistake," for which they would need to apologize; but the apologies don't come forth because most of the lying is done on behalf of their preferred politicians.

Mediaite Caught Lying in Blatant Distortion of Transcript of J.D. Vance Interview.  Mediaite, a leftist publication, has been caught lying in a blatant distortion of a transcript of an interview that now-Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH) did years ago on MSNBC in an obvious attempt to interfere in former President Donald Trump's vice presidential selection process.  The left-leaning anti-Trump publication ran a headline on Wednesday as part of the globalists' last-ditch effort to stop Vance from getting selected as Trump's running mate in the 2024 presidential election that, if true, would certainly make heads in Trump world turn: "JD Vance Said He Believes Trump's Sexual Assault Accuser in Unearthed Interview."  The problem with Mediaite's headline — and its story — is that this is not an accurate reflection of what Vance said in a 2016 interview with then-MSNBC host Chris Matthews.

Russell Brand Blasts Corporate Media for Normalizing Heart Failure in Young People.  Britsh comedian Russell Brand has accused the corporate media of pushing to normalize the global crisis of young, healthy people dying suddenly from heart failure.  Brand argues that rather than highlight the fact that the surges in cardiac injuries and related only surged after the Covid mRNA shots were rolled out, the corporate media is attempting to gaslight the public into believing it is completely normal.  During an episode of his "Stay Free" podcast this week, Brand said:  "On legacy media, it's quite possible to watch a kind of bright breezy, cheerful news item about heart attacks as if it's like some new trend, as if it's Pogs or Pokemon Go or something.  "It's a new sensation, heart disease in young people."

The Media Is Fully Exposed as Much as Biden in Debate.  The debate showed everyone what happens when the Democratic communications machine, formerly known as the media, is bypassed, and candidates can be seen clearly by the American people without the filters.  The media has been lying — expect this word to come up a lot — to the American people on behalf of Biden and Democrats for years.  But the very second they are unable to control the content and the narrative, the truth comes busting out for everyone to see.  It was glorious and horrific.  President Trump could not have been more right when he said in April 2019 that the media is "truly the enemy of the people."  The Hill (media) said Trump was "ratcheting up his use of the derisive label to attack the news media."  There's some straight reporting.  It quickly evolved in the media narrative of Trump's war on the media, the go-to phrase of the lemming journos.  No.  The Hill was wrong.  It has long been the media's war on the American people who are not bi-coastal elites.  Trump was so right.

Barack Obama and the Stupidity of the American Voter.  Is the American media establishment fair, balanced, and independent?  Do the FBI, CIA, IRS, and Justice Department stand for the rule of law, judicial fairness, and the American way?  Is the GOP a formidable political foe, working hard to contain the excesses of crazed liberal Democrats?  No, not remotely, and you gotta be kidding.  The despicable media spread the lies they're given, enthusiastically and in unison, often using the exact same language.  It's almost as if they've been given a script to follow.  They have.  If the current American justice system didn't have two standards, why, it would have no standards at all!  A simple comparison of the judicial treatment afforded, say, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump makes that abundantly clear.  You're free to burn down a city, if you're BLM, but say prayers across the street from an abortion abattoir, and you're going to prison.  As for the GOP, those pretenders and senders of strongly worded letters and subpoenas that are thrown into the circular file as soon as they're received, they have a perfect avatar in former Senate leader Mitch McConnell:  a chinless, bespectacled turtle.

Biden's Failing Brain Exposes Deep State Treachery.  [Scroll down]  You knew that Biden lost his marbles long ago, but the propaganda press has been telling the world that he's just fine for years. [...] Just as reporters in the first half of the twentieth century lied to the American people about FDR's reliance upon a wheelchair, reporters in the first quarter of the twenty-first century have lied to the American people about Biden's debilitating dementia.  On June 27, the lid on journalists' barrel of Biden-protecting lies shot right off.  Not even halfway through Biden's debate disaster, his communications people were spreading a new lie — that he was suffering from a cold — to explain away his enfeebled and bewildered presence on stage. [...] but the guy had been hiding away at Camp David for over a week!  When you first tell the public that you are unable to perform your presidential duties and prepare for a debate at the same time and then tell them that your weeklong debate camp destroyed your immune system, you aren't in a position to inspire sympathy.

An MSM fairytale.  Since he shuffled into the White House in 2021 we all knew that there was something off about this guy. [...] For the last several weeks, the MSM has been trying to continue the Biden-as-competent fable by blaming Republicans for "cheap fakes."  That was an accusation that Republicans were toying with video and pics of the president to make him look incompetent, as if any such effort was needed to expose his deterioration.  Then the news regarding Biden's absurd debate boot camp.  Why would a professional politician for over 50 years require such an absurdly long and involved prep?  The answer is that the MSM has been complicit in the "fit as a fiddle" charade by fully embracing the regularly administered marching orders and talking points from the White House.  Many commentators are now complaining that they were misled and cannot believe that they were lied to about Biden's infirmaries.  If this is true, it demonstrates a stunning level of naivete.  If they were lied to about something so obvious, what else are they lapping up off the floor?

The Gaza Famine That Never Was.  New evidence indicates that, contrary to claims by top U.S. officials and international media, the Gaza Strip is not on the precipice of a widespread famine that Western experts claimed would endanger millions of innocent Palestinians.  "Famine is imminent" in northern Gaza, the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), a network of Western governments, the United Nations, and nonprofit groups, warned in March, prompting unfounded accusations that Israel is using starvation as a war tactic.  The IPC's report was quickly amplified by outlets like the Washington Post, which foretold "imminent famine" in Gaza.  Politico, the New York Times, and CNN alleged Israel is guilty of war crimes.  But on Tuesday, the IPC revised its initial assessment, saying that the projected famine in Gaza did not come to fruition in May.  "The available evidence does not indicate that Famine is currently occurring," the organization said in its latest report, which notes that Israel has significantly increased aid and that conditions as a whole in Gaza have drastically improved.  This is the latest example of an international agency walking back its initial assessment of the situation in Gaza.

What to do about woke science journals.  Let me define the "woke" in the title very broadly as promoting any of...
  a) a favored narrative or questionable treatment (e.g., publishing only articles supporting a huge climate change impact or government COVID-19 policies while rejecting high-quality articles with solid evidence to the contrary);
  b) CRT and DEI (e.g., employment processes and medical treatment; justifying BLM rallies during a mandatory and supposedly necessary COVID lockdown);
  c) the trans agenda (e.g., suppression of literature on psychological diagnoses or social media influence; transition surgery for minors; birth certificate with the desired gender of the baby or its parents; males in female sports);
  d) TDS (e.g., numerous get-Trump Lancet editorials having nothing to do with medicine; the Lancet by-passing its usual peer-review process to rush a negative study on hydroxychloroquine to print after Trump said HCQ might work, only to have to retract it ten days later after the data were proven bogus);
  e) rescinding already published or posted articles after pressure from advocacy groups.
There can be overlap between categories.

Wrong, Mainstream Media, Tree Rings Aren't Reliable Indicators of Past Temperatures.  Dozens of media outlets such as ABC News, The BBC, The New York Times, and many more, hyped a study that claims summer temperatures in 2023 were unprecedented over the past 2000 years.  This claim, in fact, can't be verified by tree ring data, which isn't that precise.  Researchers are falsely assuming tree rings are reliable temperature indicators when in fact tree rings can indicate a multitude of different conditions, not just temperature.

BBC Climate Disinformation Reporter Attacks Kenyan Farmer.  On 15th June 2024, the BBC Climate disinformation reporter Marco Silva published a hit piece on the Kenyan farmer Jusper Machogu, entitled "How a Kenyan farmer became a champion of climate change denial."  The reporter claims that Mr Machogu, a 29-year-old farmer with many thousands of followers on X for his campaign "Fossil Fuels for Africa," holds dangerous views denying climate change.  I don't personally know Mr Machogu, and I am certain that he doesn't need defense.  I grew up without electricity and I recently explained how I questioned the official climate narrative.  I do find it extremely disgusting that a senior journalist sitting in Greater London, using daily modern technologies powered by fossil fuels, in a country that became rich thanks to fossil fuels (and loot from Kenya), should write such a disdainful piece on one of the biggest media outlets on earth about a young man who appears to have knowledge, hard work, and passion to serve his community and people.  I also find this piece below the BBC's editorial standards which include values such as truth, fairness, accuracy, and impartiality.

The intellectual dishonesty of Democrats proven once again.  The Cleveland Plain Dealer was forced on June 18, 2024 to retract entirely a June 9th op-ed written by Democrat lawyer and political consultant Neil Baron when it was threatened with slander and libel lawsuits from three FBI whistleblowers because of the blatent false accusations Baron included in this op-ed.  Baron's op-ed, which [one] can still read [elsew]here, was mostly a partisan attack on Congressman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and his effort to expose the FBI's non-stop abuse of power.  In doing so, however, Baron accused three FBI whistle-blowers of doing things they did not do. [...] In other words, Baron was making these accusations up, and the newspaper did no fact-checking prior to publication, accepting those bald-faced lies without question.  That they were lies is illustrated by how fast the newspaper reacted when told they were lies, retracting the op-ed only one day after it was approached by representatives of the whistle-blowers.

The dictionary just got a little heavier.
Biden Loyalist Media Are Gaslighting Us Again.  Of all the the 2020 election's dirty tricks, the nastiest was when the media and the IC abused public trust to suppress an entirely-true, but highly damaging story about Hunter's laptop.  Because Blinken leaned on his buddies to suppress the story, the New York Post scoop about Hunter's laptop had been suppressed.  Polls have since told us that enough Biden voters in battleground states would have changed their vote based on that laptop information that the Presidential race would have turned in Trump's favor.  The truth eventually came out — in the Hunter Biden prosecution this month, ironically — but the Biden was sworn in and the damage was already done.  One Conservative voice has given it a name:  Laptopping.  [Tweet]

Obama Seeks 4th Term.  With Obama still at the helm, the fundamental transformation of America continues.  Meanwhile, the entire American news propaganda machine continues to act as if they don't know, including Fox News personalities, referring to Biden as if he really is a President, Harris as if she really is a Vice President, and the 2024 election as if there's any legitimacy to U.S. elections since 2016.  Oh, they know, but they don't dare tell it like it really is, which is why the entire U.S. news industry has a popularity rating even below Biden's anemic levels, and the talk-talk-talk but do-nothing Congress.  People started turning to Tik Tok and other social media platforms in a desperate search for any real news years ago.  That's why everyone in D.C. was united in the power grab of Tik Tok.  Not because of so-called "Chinese spying," but because it was the last place they didn't totally control the narrative for public consumption.

No, ScienceNews, Your "Ocean's Record-Breaking Hot Streak" Claims Are False.  A recent ScienceNews (SN) article claims that ocean temperatures are out of control in a year-long record-breaking hot streak.  This is false.  Numerous ocean temperature data sets show no such record-breaking values and the source SN cited to support its claims was thoroughly discredited when it made similar "record breaking" claims last year.  The entire claim of the article is based on one data set, which is seen below in the SN article: [...] The problem is this single source isn't even an "official" ocean temperature data data set, rather the source is: Source:  Climate Reanalyzer/Univ. of Maine ∙ Visualization:  C. Crockett.  In fact, that isn't temperature data at all, but climate model output.  The data SN cited was not official data, but from a private website run by the University of Maine.  Examining actual data sets show that SN claim of record ocean heat is a gross error.

The Feds Are Itching to J6 Us Again.  [Scroll down]  To this day, White House spokespeople, members of Congress, federal judges, and television news anchors describe January 6, 2021 as a "deadly insurrection."  It does not matter to them that none of the J6 protesters was armed or that the only people killed were Trump-supporters.  It does not matter to them that the vast majority of J6 defendants were engaging in harmless acts of political advocacy.  It does not matter to them that there was never any nefarious plot to somehow topple the federal government.  Reprehensible prosecutors seeking outrageous sentences for questionable trespass crimes and unsympathetic, partisan judges who insist on haranguing defendants for engaging in imaginary sedition have railroaded scores of Americans for the "crime" of exercising their free speech.

A Slate writer gaslights about the allegedly great Biden economy.  Zachary Carter, writing for hard-left Slate, has issued his verdict on the economy:  It's great.  Wholly contrary to popular belief, he assures us, "Inflation Is Not Destroying Joe Biden."  So why can't the rest of America see it?  'Tis a mystery to be solved, and he buries us under "data" to make his point.  Ultimately, his piece is a primal scream of horror that Americans insist on believing the realities of their wallets over the cherry-picked data in his analysis.  First, Carter first declares that inflation is a thing of the past.  "According to the Federal Reserve's preferred measure, prices rose just 2.7 percent between April of 2023 and April of 2024."  The problem with the Fed is that its "core" inflation number excludes the cost of food, housing, and energy — the things that average Americans spend the vast majority of their income purchasing.

June temperatures [are] at half the level of this time last year.  Temperatures in June 2024 are at half the level of 2023, the Met Office has said, although warmer weather is predicted towards the end of the month.  While London was experiencing 32C (89.6F) a year ago, temperatures were around 16C (60.8F) in the capital on Tuesday.  Similarly Cambridge had temperatures of 30.3C (86.5F) on June 11 2023, and 15C (59F) on the same day in 2024.  Temperatures are around 2C (35.6F) below average for the time of year, with scattered showers this week that could turn into heavy rain by Thursday, while some areas could see ground frosts.

The Editor says...
Somehow I would like to rebut the article above without including a cliché like cherry-picking.  Oops, too late.  It's easy to find examples of a high (or low) temperature on some date that was "half" (or "double") the temperature on the same day in the previous year.  This is made easier by the use of the Celsius temperature scale, in which the day-to-day ambient temperatures are recorded with smaller numbers than in areas that use the Fahrenheit scale.  But a decrease from 32°C. to 16°C. does not mean it's only half as warm outside.  On the absolute (Kelvin) scale, that's a change from 305°K. to 289°K.  Hardly any difference.  This is another example of the news media attempting to make problems sound worse than they really are, and hoping you don't know why they are in error.  These are the same people who sound the alarm about a one-half degree average temperature increase by the end of this century.  On the absolute scale, it's almost no change at all.  It's background noise, especially compared to the temperature differences between day and night and between summer and winter.

What the Biden Campaign Doesn't Want You to Know About His Philly Audience.  As I reported earlier, Joe Biden went to Philadelphia on Wednesday to try to make another pitch to black voters to stop fleeing and vote for him and Kamala Harris. [...] In his photos, you can see the people are all in the front of the gym, only about half of it is full and there's a big press bandstand, then a whole press area with tables.  The second photo on the top right shows most of the people although there may be a little more on the left that are not shown.  I'll leave it to you to assess how many people there were, but it wasn't a lot.  Certainly not "packed" or "huge."  Trump has more people waiting for him hours before his events start.  In other words, as the GOP noted, Joe Biden couldn't even fill up a school gym in Democrat-run Philadelphia.

The Top 20 Lies of the 2020s.  Lying is an epidemic even worse than COVID.  Our president and his press secretaries seem to lie with every word they say and deny facts that anyone with a pair of eyes can see for himself.  Scientists and doctors, formerly among the most trusted members of our society, lie to foster popular environmental theories and get government grants, or to promote Big Pharma and deter people from effective treatments.  Our news media no longer report the news; they shape the news as instructed.  Here is just a sample of commonly promoted lies starting in 2020. [...]

They lie because they get away with it.  The death of Morgan Spurlock showed why people in the media lie.  They get away with it and it pays well.  He made a movie for $65,000 called Super Size Me and collected a hefty share of its $22 million gross at the box office.  The premise was he ate nothing but McDonald's food for 30 days and it ruined his health.  The food did not.  He died of cancer not obesity.  His liver likely was in bad shape but it wasn't from milkshakes and Big Macs.  It was from 40 years of drinking, going back to when he was 13.  Nevertheless, the media sold the lie for 20 years, and continued the lie in his obituaries, although a few outlets included a paragraph or two buried in the story that put his lie in perspective. [...] The media heavily promoted him and his movie when it debuted 20 years ago.  Overnight, journalists became instant dietitians — just like they became instant virologists 4 years ago when covid 19 arrived from Wuhan.

How the Propaganda System Works.  This major new piece of distracting disinfotainment is solid misinformation.  It's fortified with pseudo-nutritional lies that support the Official Narrative.  On whatever...  The Covid scamdemic/plannedemic.  Or the "safe and effective" vaccines that keep killing and maiming millions with heart damage, blood clots, myocarditis, neurological disorders, paralysis, autoimmune disease, turbo cancers, infertility, sterility, and death.  Or the apocalyptic "killer virus" that never existed.  It was just another mild seasonal flu, if it existed at all.  Or that whopper, life-threatening man-made "global warming."  Which morphed into the "climate change" hoax.  Or the 2020 US presidential election where vote-counting suddenly stopped in five or six key states so that rejiggering could take place, but you were assured nothing untoward happened — and if you think it did happen then you're a right-wing dupe misled by bad people and conspiracy theories.  Or "Israel's right to defend itself" as it carries out a televised genocide in full public view to complete its extermination/removal/dispossession of the Palestinian people begun in 1947-1949. [...] Inflation is firmly under control, thanks to our great "president" Joseph Robinette Biden, a usurper/imposter like his CIA-groomed puppetmaster Barry Soetoro (aka Obama).  Today a fast-food meal — burger, fries, soda — costs nearly 20 bucks, going up to $26.99 real soon as America's wars continue.

About those 'all electric' 'zero emissions' fire trucks.  They have diesel engines.  When Albuquerque announced plans to acquire a new fire engine, New Mexico's governor lauded the "zero emissions" technology while a fire department spokesman called it "all electric" and KRQE 13 gushed about the "fully electric" fire truck.  San Diego's NBC 7 reported on what it called that city's first "all electric fire apparatus."  When the electric fire engine debuted in Portland, NBC's KGW 8 quoted a fire department spokesman lauding the "monumental" "zero emissions" vehicle.  When an electric fire truck came to Gilbert, Arizona, FOX 10 quoted the fire chief saying that "There's no cancer coming out of the tail pipe and I say it that way because diesel particulates are a contributor for cancers."  Viewers could be forgiven for thinking that the new fire trucks were all electric and zero emissions.  They'd be wrong.  All the fire trucks also have a diesel engine and a tailpipe releases those "cancer-causing particulates."

The Ravings of a Kindly Old Man with a Poor Memory.  [Scroll down]  Speaking of pathetic, who among you believes anything the sad, servile mainstream media parrots?  Do they not lie as easily as they breathe?  Are they not completely predictable as to how they will deal with a given circumstance?  Are they not foul creatures fully under the control of the D.C. swamp?  They are.

Sorry, Climate Activists, Montana Climate Harms Are Not Occurring.  An environmental activist website called The Cool Down (TCD) just embarrassed itself by making provably false claims about climate change in Montana and by showing it cannot read a basic calendar.  On May 7, 2024, TCD published an article titled, "State lawmakers pass unprecedented anti-science law: 'Our families are already suffering.'"  The article begins, "Montana's legislature has passed the nation's most aggressive anti-science law, prohibiting state agencies from considering the impacts of excess heat-trapping pollution when reviewing permits for large projects like coal mines and power plants."  Apparently, TCD doesn't know how to read a calendar.  The Montana legislature passed the law in question in April 2023, more than a full year before the TCD article, which is written as if the law had just recently been passed. [...] TCD's sloppy research is not restricted just to calendar reading.  The article embarrasses itself regarding climate change, also.  According to TCD, "This legislation comes at a pivotal time, as Montana's climate has already changed significantly over the past century.  The state has experienced earlier snowmelt, more frequent heat waves, and a growing risk of wildfires."  Let's examine these three claims. [...]

Fearmongering keeps the elites in power.  [Scroll down]  More recently, experts told us that COVID-19 was so deadly, it could kill us all if we didn't do precisely as they said.  Turns out that what they instructed us to do was deadlier than COVID-19 itself. [...] There are only two types of societies.  When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.  When the government fears the people, freedom can reign.  This explains our current government's reaction to Jan. 6.  (Sadly, "the government" now includes academia and the mainstream media.)

Don't fall for this trap when watching the news.  While watching news coverage of the protests on college campuses, one segment caught my attention.  A TV Anchor reacting to a Forbes report about some employers hiring fewer Ivy League school graduates.  The main reason had nothing to do with the protests but with Ivy League universities' recruiting being more about specialists than well-rounded students.  But this anchor used the report as an opportunity to stir up a culture war.  North vs. south.  Elite private institutions vs. public universities.  All while saying, "See?  This is why they don't want to hire you."  While criticizing a school's handling of a situation is fair and so is student behavior, good journalists know better than to make blanket statements about a group or a place.  Having worked for years as a reporter, I know that within crowds are many stories and journalists should share them and offer context and nuance.

Why would the public ever trust media outlets [...] ?  [Scroll down]  So why would it be a surprise that the people who support Obama and Biden would also support the protesters wreaking anti-Jew havoc across the nation? [...] The media also pretends that Trump politicized the Justice Department[,] when that is most certainly Obama and Biden.  They pretend that Democrat policies want to help the poor and minorities, when the goal of Democrats for over sixty years has been to make more people dependent on the government, instead of giving them more of an opportunity to move up the economic ladder due to the joys of capitalism.  The media and other Democrats acted surprised and shocked at how much damage keeping schools closed caused children.  Only an idiot would be surprised.  They pretend that rich people like Bill Gates, Obama, George Soros, Michael Bloomberg, John Kerry, and others care about their carbon footprint as they fly in private jets, own multiple mansions, and buy yachts.  They pretend that rich people buying worthless pieces of paper called carbon credits reduces their massive carbon footprint.  Those pieces of paper do nothing.

Why climate change ISN'T going to end the world.  Young people are terrified that climate change will destroy Earth by the time they grow up, but the world is not actually ending, argues Cambridge professor Mike Hulme.  Humanity is not teetering on a cliff's edge, he says, at risk of imminent catastrophe if we don't reach net-zero carbon emissions by a certain date.  And he has made it his mission to call out the people who claim we are.  In his most recent book, Climate Change Isn't Everything, Hulme argued that belief in the urgent fight against climate change has shot far past the territory of science and become an ideology.  Hulme, a professor of human geography at the University of Cambridge, dubs this ideology 'climatism,' and he argues that it can distort the way society approaches the world's ills, placing too much focus on slowing Earth from warming.

The Editor says...
The article immediately above is accompanied by an Associated Press photo showing brown clouds coming from three vertical stacks.  This is an attempt to depict a factory (probably a power plant) emitting huge quantities of smoke into the air.  Astute readers will notice that the vapor comes out of the big pipes and quickly disappears in the ambient air.  That is the behavior of water vapor, not smoke.  The photo has been doctored in an attempt to make a problem out of something that is not a problem.  That's propaganda.

The imaginary "climate crisis" is a product of climate activists and click-bait media.  The UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ("IPCC") reports don't define what a "climate crisis" is.  The crisis that supposedly requires society to achieve zero carbon emissions or, at least, "net zero."  On the contrary, the IPCC's latest Assessment Report ("AR6") published in 2021 points out that corporate media's opinion of climate change has moved away from a neutral position by adopting and promoting terms like "climate crisis," "global heating" and "climate emergency."  Such a statement by the IPCC should leave no doubt that the concept of an ongoing "climate crisis" is a joint product of climate activists and the click-hungry media, lacking a solid scientific basis, Aivar Usk writes.

Truth Has Become A Casualty In Modern Journalism.  Journalism once provided truthful insight into the news of the day. [...] Those days are long past.  We should all be mourning the death of truth, but alas, few recognize what has happened to truth as a tool to strengthen nations and guard against ruinous corruption.  Truth has become a casualty of evil people's schemes.  The murder of truth was intentionally committed by individuals and organizations who cannot accomplish their goals through rational, logical, and reasonable public debate.  The world is in the grips of mass propaganda, deceit, and an otherworldly strong delusion.

L A Times Editorial Claim that "The planet is experiencing a horrifying streak of record-breaking heat" is Unsupported by NOAA's Climate Data.  The opening L A Times editorial paragraph claims that for California "the last few months have been more than 2 degrees hotter than average".  This claim is erroneous as demonstrated in the discussion below.  NOAA's data for the maximum temperatures experienced in California for the month of February 2024 as well as all February months for years from 1895 to 2023 are shown below.  [Charts]  NOAA's data shows the mean February maximum temperature over its base period interval of 1901 [to] 2000 is 55.6 degrees F compared to California's February 2024 maximum value of 56.0 degrees F (0.4 degrees F above the mean) as indicated in NOAA's data table below versus the Times distorted and false claim of "2 degrees hotter than average".  [More charts]  More importantly, the February 2024 maximum temperature of 56 degrees F in California is only the 62nd highest out of 130 total February recorded highest values with the 2024 temperature clearly not representing "a horrifying streak of record-breaking heat" as falsely hyped by the L A Times editorial.

Media Hoax:  No, Israel Did Not Dig 'Mass Grave' At Gaza's Nasser Hospital.  Another day, another Hamas hoax amplified by Democrats and the mainstream media.  This time around, the story is about a mass grave at Gaza's Nasser Hospital that was allegedly only recently discovered, according to workers for the Hamas-run Gaza Civil Defense.  CNN, of course, was among the numerous media outlets to breathlessly report on the story, which strongly insinuated the IDF dug the graves and, in the process, committed war crimes.  Make sure to take note of the framing:  [Advertisement]  ["]The United Nations has called for an 'independent, effective and transparent investigation' into the discovery of mass graves at two Gaza hospitals that were besieged and raided by Israeli troops this year.  The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk said in a statement he was 'horrified' by the scenes reported from both the Nasser and Al Shifa medical complexes in the besieged enclave.["] [...] Hamas Caucus leader Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) pounced and seized, and demanded to know where the media coverage was, apparently ignoring the fact that national news outlets had already picked up the ball and run with it:  [Tweet]

Divide & Conquer:  The Government's Propaganda of Fear & Fake News.  [T]he political scene in the United States has devolved over the years into a carefully calibrated exercise in how to manipulate, polarize, propagandize and control a population. [...] As long as we are distracted, entertained, occasionally outraged, always polarized but largely uninvolved and content to remain in the viewer's seat, we'll never manage to present a unified front against tyranny (or government corruption and ineptitude) in any form.  Studies suggest that the more reality TV people watch — and I would posit that it's all reality TV, entertainment news included — the more difficult it becomes to distinguish between what is real and what is carefully crafted farce.  "We the people" are watching a lot of TV.  On average, Americans spend five hours a day watching television.  By the time we reach age 65, we're watching more than 50 hours of television a week, and that number increases as we get older.  And reality TV programming consistently captures the largest percentage of TV watchers every season by an almost 2-1 ratio.

The Collapse of the Mainstream Media Part 3: COVID-19.  During a major crisis, the mainstream media has a duty to ask hard questions and scrutinize official claims and thus fulfill its responsibility to provide objective, accurate, and reliable reporting.  During the COVID pandemic, however, legacy media became the mouthpiece of officialdom whose ever-changing and backpedaling claims were unquestionably parroted by their media assets.  As a result, the public's trust dropped, according to Gallup, who noted in October 2022 that "this is the first time that the percentage of Americans with no trust at all in the media is higher than the percentage with a great deal or a fair amount combined."  As fears and hysteria over COVID grew and grew, the public looked increasingly to the media for information and assurances regarding the safety and effectiveness of the experimental mRNA vaccines that were rushed to market during Operation Warp Speed.  In response, legacy media dutifully echoed the assurances from the authorities that the vaccines are "safe and effective."  However, these claims were ultimately proven false.

USA Today Wants You to Believe Joe Biden 'Clamped' Down on the Illegal Immigration.  President Joe Biden has "clamped" down on illegal border crossings, according to USA Today — the millions of immigrants still crossing the southern border must have not gotten the memo yet.  USA Today is taking heat after publishing an article on Friday claiming that Biden has done tremendous work on securing the U.S.-Mexico border. [...] Since day one of Biden's term, he has halted deportations, stopped border wall construction, Ended the Trump-era Remain In Mexico policy and Title 42, and reinstated a catch-and-release program — all of which have encouraged illegal immigrants to come to the United States.  As of Saturday, Biden has yet to reverse any of those policies and put his foot down on illegal immigration.  So unless there is an invisible fence along the southern border, the U.S. border is still wide open for aliens to cross.

Former ESPN host reveals that her 2021 Biden interview was scripted.  In a recent interview with Fox News, former ESPN host Sage Steele revealed that her interview from March 2021 with Joe Biden was scripted by network executives.  "That was an interesting experience in its own right because it was so structured," Steele revealed.  She said her superiors asked her to repeat "every word" that they wrote for her and warned her to "not deviate from the script" they'd prepared. [...] Since Steele wasn't sitting with Biden in person, it is quite likely that he was reading the answers from another script before him.  To sum it up, the Steele interview was more like a scripted short video than an interview.

Sage Steele Says ESPN Bosses Made Her Follow 'Every Word' Of Carefully Planned Q&A With Biden.  Former ESPN anchor Sage Steele opened up about an interview she conducted with President Joe Biden while working for the network in 2021, telling Fox News that her bosses made sure she would follow "every word" of the script during her exchange with the commander-in-chief.  Steele, who left ESPN after criticizing its COVID vaccine mandate, said her headline-making interview with Biden in March 2021 was carefully planned out by the network's executives, and she was told "not to deviate" from the written questions.  The interview focused on sports returning to normalcy following months of COVID lockdowns, along with athletes and fans being hesitant to get the COVID shot, Fox News reported.  Biden repeatedly admonished Americans to "follow the science" and get vaccinated during the interview.  "That was an interesting experience in its own right because it was so structured," Steele said.  "And I was told, 'You will say every word that we write out, you will not deviate from the script and go.'"

Dems, Media Push New Study Linking Climate Change to Inflation, But Economists Aren't Buying It.  Liberals are touting a new study linking climate change and inflation, but economists say that the real causes are more likely to be massive government interventions in the economy purporting to save the climate.  The study, authored by four European researchers and published in the scientific journal Communications:  Earth and Environment on March 21, argues that "temperature increases cause nonlinear, persistent increases in food and headline inflation," according to its text.  While corporate media outlets, climate activists and Democrats have boosted the study's findings, the forces related to climate change that are likely to drive persistent inflation are massive government taxation, spending and regulation pushed by policymakers to fight climate change, according to economists who spoke with the Daily Caller News Foundation.

Jon Stewart Falsely Claims Loans to Trump Meant Fewer Loans To Other People.  Claim:  Comedian Jon Stewart said this week that the loans at the center of the civil real-estate case against Donald Trump meant there were fewer loans available to other borrowers.  "Money isn't infinite.  A loan that goes to the liar doesn't go to someone who's giving a more honest evaluation.  So the system becomes incentivized for corruption," Stewart said.  Verdict:  False.  The amount of money available for loans from banks is not diminished when banks make loans to other customers, except in the rare case of a distressed bank that is capital-constrained.  A loan to one customer does not subtract from a fixed pool of loans available to the other customers of the bank.  Stewart's comments reflect a misconception of a bank as a kind of money vault where taking some money out to lend leaves less money out for other loans.

The Editor says...
Joe Biden seems to think the money supply is infinite.  Just look at the federal deficit.  Does the national debt keep him from spending more money?  Both Mr. Biden and Mr. Stewart would benefit from economics classes.

Gaza:  Truths Behind All the Lies.  [Lie #1]  "Occupied Gaza."  Prior to October 7, there were roughly two million Arab citizens of Israel but no Jewish citizens in Gaza.  Gazans in 2006 voted in Hamas to rule them.  It summarily executed its Palestinian Authority rivals.  Hamas cancelled all future scheduled elections.  It established a dictatorship and diverted hundreds of billions of dollars in international aid to build a vast underground labyrinth of military installations.  [Lie #2]  "Collateral Damage."  Hamas began the war by deliberately targeting civilians.  It massacred them on October 7 when it invaded Israel during a time of peace and holidays.  It sent more than 7,000 rockets into Israeli cities for the sole purpose of killing noncombatants.  It has no vocabulary for the collateral damage of Israeli civilians, since it believes any Jewish death under any circumstances is cause for celebration.  Hamas places its terrorist centers beneath and inside hospitals, schools, and mosques.  Why?  Israel is assumed to have more reservations about collaterally hitting Gaza civilians than Hamas does exposing them as human shields.

Jon Stewart found to have overvalued his NYC home by 829% after labeling Trump's civil case 'not victimless'.  Jon Stewart is facing online backlash after the comedian opined on air this week that Donald Trump's civil real estate case for overvaluing his properties was "not victimless" — when it turns out the price of a previous home sale finds Stewart doing the exact same thing, The [New York] Post has learned.  On Monday night, Stewart, 61, unpacked Trump's $454 million appeal bond, calling out experts framing the former president's New York civil case as not causing direct harm to any individual.  "The Daily Show" host rolled a clip of CNN's Laura Coates interviewing "Shark Tank" star Kevin O'Leary, who commented that the ruling didn't "go over well" with the real estate industry that was now fretting over the possibility of becoming the next target.

BBC Meteorologist Falsely Claims South Sudan is Experiencing "Extreme Heat" for March.  South Sudan is experiencing "extreme heatwaves" and is shutting schools and cutting power, reports BBC meteorologist Matt Taylor.  "It is exceptionally early for South Sudan to experience such heat — temperatures often exceed 43°C but only in the summer months, according to the World Bank's Climate Change portal," he states.  Hot days in the capital Juba — five degrees north of the equator — are for some a big 'climate change' story, but it is difficult to read into the World Bank data the interpretation that Taylor wants to publicise.  In fact it is impossible, since the data clearly show that average South Sudan temperatures peak in March and then fall away through the wet monsoon 'summer' months.

Tony Bobulinski's Lawyer Threatens Lawsuit Against Fox News' Jessica Tarlov for Dishonest Accusation.  Tony Bobulinski's testimony before Congress is upsetting all the right people.  As a former associate of Hunter Biden, he has been spilling the tea about the Biden family's business dealings, which isn't sitting well with folks on the left.  They responded to his involvement with House Republicans' impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden by doing their level best to smear and discredit the witness.  However, Bobulinski has been fighting back.  Jessica Tarlov, a left-leaning co-host on Fox News' "The Five," stepped in it on Wednesday when she claimed, without evidence, that Bobulinski was being funded by Super PAC aligned with former President Donald Trump during a recent broadcast.

Liberal FOX News Host Jessica Tarlov Forced to Issue On-Air Correction About Tony Bobulinski.  Jessica Tarlov, one of the rotating liberal hosts of The Five on FOX News, was forced to issue an on-air correction about former Hunter Biden associate Tony Bobulinski on Thursday.  On Wednesday, Tarlov made some comments about who is paying Bobulinki's legal fees.  His lawyer was quick to react and apparently threatened a lawsuit.

Larry Summers:  Inflation [is] Much Worse Than [the] Government Says.  Lawrence Summers, Treasury Secretary under Clinton and economic advisor to Obama, is likely getting himself into trouble once again with the Left.  While president of Harvard, he blurted out the obvious fact that men and women may be different, leading to a vote of no confidence by the faculty of Harvard, and since Biden's election he has been critical of the president's economic policies, warning that they were harming the economy.  Well, he's done it again, this time in an economic paper that provides the explanation for what the Left calls the "vibesession" — the persistent belief by Americans that the economy is much worse than the official statistics indicate.  [Tweet]

Trump talks 'bloodbath' in auto industry if cheap Chinese EVs flood the market — Dems pretend he called for violence.  The media and other Democrats know that Joe Biden and his policies are unpopular, so for the last eight years, they've sought to destroy Donald Trump, no matter how much they have to intentionally lie and mislead the public, and this latest iteration is beyond absurd.  While speaking at a recent campaign rally, Trump said there would be a "bloodbath" in the auto industry if China flooded the American market with cheap electric vehicles flowing through Mexico — but instead of showing the full quote, much of the media, along with Biden campaign workers and Democrats like Pelosi, decided that with polls as bad as they are, they should intentionally mislead the public that Trump had called for violence if he doesn't win in November.

Regime Media:  ABC World News Tonight Advances The Bloodbath Hoax.  Despite clear, documented context to the contrary, ABC continues to push the discredited piece of Biden campaign propaganda known as the Bloodbath Hoax, and ties it to the Capitol Riot.  Additionally, ABC promoted a 2024 version of an immigration narrative that was trotted out both in 2015 and 2019.  Watch as ABC's Chief Biden Apple Polisher Mary Bruce broadcasts campaign disinformation from behind the anchor desk, framing correspondent Maryalice Parks' video package:  [Video clip]  As I said during my recap of the Sunday shows, to accept the idea that people who are the elite in the industry of communicating with words are suddenly unable to comprehend plain English requires multiple significant suspensions of disbelief.  That's not to say that some of these elites are not intellectually deficient.  But not to this extent.  Which leaves willful deception as the only likely reason why reporters, correspondents and anchors would, in near unanimity continue to promote Trump's assessment of damage to the American automotive industry under a second Biden term as both a violent threat and a January 6th-adjacent attack against democracy.

President Trump Warns of a Looming Bloodbath in the Auto Industry Related to Chinese EV Plants in Mexico - Media Go Bananas.  Having previously written about the issue of three major Chinese EV makers putting massive investment into production facilities, the remarks by President Trump in Ohio warning of a "bloodbath" in the auto industry are exactly accurate.  According to media, last December the three Chinese auto manufacturers, MG, BYD, and Chery, announced they were going to spend billions building new EV manufacturing plants in Mexico.  Each Chinese auto manufacturer was going to spend between $1.5 to $2.0 billion.  The Chinese don't make that much of an investment in something unless they are sure the U.S. government is going to force the EV market to exist.  These manufacturing plants would crush the U.S[.] EV market.  Drawing attention to the issue, President Trump said he can stop the pending crisis.  However, if he did not win the election the American auto industry would end up with a "bloodbath" of closed plants, lost jobs and diminished labor union workforce.  Trump is not wrong.  [Video clip]

Media Bloodbath:  Elon Musk Is Now More Trustworthy Than Every Major News Outlet.  Shortly after Donald Trump made remarks at a rally in Ohio, Joe Scarborough posted on X: "Donald Trump's America.  And he is proud of it.  Promised another 'bloodbath' if he loses again."  The picture was from the Jan. 6 riot.  Soon after, however, Scarborough deleted the post.  We can't say for certain why, except that he hit the delete button shortly after Elon Musk responded to "Morning Joe" with this comment:  [Tweet]  At least Scarborough had the good sense to take back his inflammatory and wildly out-of-context portrayal of what Trump had said.  The same can't be said for almost every other major news outlet, which ran blood-curdling headlines about Trump's supposed call to violence if he loses.

This could be the devastating proof that Hamas is faking its death figures.  One of the marks of anti-Semitism, George Orwell observed in 1945, is "an ability to believe stories that could not possibly be true".  Which brings us smartly to Hamas and how the broadcast media, aid organisations, international bodies and world leaders take its disinformation as gospel.  Last week it became clear that this gullibility may have led to a crime against reality.  A new analysis of the group's casualty statistics indicates that the rag-tag terror army may have pulled off one of the biggest propaganda coups of modern times.  The figures, repeated by everyone from the White House to the BBC, are freighted with familiarity: 30,000 dead in Gaza, 70 percent of whom are women and children.  Yet it now seems overwhelmingly likely that these statistics are fabricated.  Professor Abraham Wyner, a data scientist at the University of Pennsylvania, has conducted a thorough analysis.  He found that Hamas's official civilian death toll was statistically impossible.

Reporter Leaves Out Key Facts in Hit Piece on Libs of TikTok.  Vice News published a story last fall asserting that Libs of TikTok, the popular social media account run by Chaya Raichik, was responsible for a rise in school bomb threats.  The reporter, Tess Owen, wrote that "bomb threats targeting schools or school districts following Libs of TikTok posts appears to be a particularly ominous escalation."  She then cited a "disturbing pattern" from 11 school districts.  Newly obtained emails, released Thursday by Raichik, suggest that Owen wasn't completely truthful in her reporting.  In a post on X, Libs of TikTok claimed Vice News and Owen "knowingly withheld critical information about me because it didn't fit their narrative."  [Tweet]

Entire staff at Deadspin fired months after they smeared 9-year-old Chiefs fan as a racist.  Just five months after Deadspin tried to smear a 9-year-old Kansas City Chiefs fan as a racist, all of the sports media outlet's employees have been fired as a part of a buyout.  Employees received an email announcing the sale, and some were told at a meeting before their access to the company's digital resources was cut off.  "Recently we were approached by the European firm Lineup Publishing expressing interest in purchasing Deadspin to add to their growing media holdings," the email read in part. [...] Deadspin was excoriated by many after it tried to misrepresent the costume worn by a young fan of the Kansas City Chiefs as "blackface."  Critics immediately slammed the outlet by pointing out that they had used a misleading photo only showing one side of the child's face and not the other, which was colored in red.  In February, the family of the boy named Holden Armenta filed a defamation lawsuit against Deadspin.  The Armenta family said they have received "a barrage of hate, including death threats" as a result of the article.

Trump's Promise — Retribution or Revenge?  [Scroll down]  The New York Times, with a long history of publishing falsehoods about Donald Trump, has already labeled Trump's potential second term, "The Retribution Presidency."  There is a smell of panic rising from midtown Manhattan and from the Beltway.  Is this revenge or retribution?  Is there a distinction? [...] Here is a summary of the two terms.  Words do matter.
  •   Retribution is a form of punishment imposed by law and legally authorized.
  •   Revenge, in contrast, is a form of personal punishment, one not sanctioned by law.
  •   The ultimate goal of Retribution is to punish the wrongdoer or offender and ensure that justice is served to the victim and public as a whole.
  •   Revenge, however, is a form of payback, to ensure that personal justice is served.  Thus, the goal of Revenge is vengeance or getting even.
  •   Retribution is only carried out for crimes and wrongs recognized in the law.  It is not personal and not fueled by a desire to persistently seek the suffering of the wrongdoer.  Instead, it imposes a punishment that is proportionate to the gravity of the crime or wrong.  Furthermore, it is governed by procedural rules and codes of conduct.
  •   In contrast, Revenge can be carried out for various wrongs, injuries, suffering and any other action considered harmful or hurtful.  There is no limit to the type of punishment imposed and the severity of such punishment.  As mentioned before, Revenge is personal and driven by a strong emotional desire to see the suffering of the person who committed the wrong or injury.
Which of these two words describe what the deep state ruling class has done to Trump versus what he will hopefully do if reelected president?

Our Constitutional Republic Has Gone Crazy But There's Nowhere To Hide.  [Laken] Riley, a 22-year-old nursing student, was murdered in Georgia for jogging alone (as the Associated Press insinuated) or by an "Athens Man" (according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution) — anything other than the realities of her alleged murderer Jose Antonio "Athens Man" Ibarra being an illegal migrant from Venezuela, arrested and released once already since his arrival in September 2022.

The MSM Is Corrupt Beyond Repair.  It's not news that the MSM is obsessed with pushing a narrative and that the narrative is grotesquely slanted to the left.  That's why Americans' trust in media is at record lows.  The decline has been rapid, and there is zero chance it will reverse any time soon.  Pretty much the only people who express any trust in the sewage that the MSM pumps out are people who love to swim in it:  Leftists.  But that doesn't mean that the propaganda mills that our media have become don't accomplish the task to which they have been set.  As much as people know that what they have been sold is [worthless], it's still the only news that most people ever get.  By sheer force of repetition, people wind up believing much of what they are told, even though they know it is slanted.  Millions of Americans believe in the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax and a whole host of other lies.  As long as the media selectively edits clips, loudly and often repeats lies, and pushes for the censorship and "fact-checking" of alternative media, lies often become conventional wisdom.

NYT Editor Blames Swing Voters Who 'Don't Know Or Remember' Trump.  New York Times headline, Feb. 20: "A Big Opportunity to Define Trump as Unacceptable."  The short item by Times Deputy Opinion Editor Patrick Healy follows up on an unintentionally hilarious focus group session the paper conducted last week, wherein 11 out of 13 voters who supported Joe Biden in 2020 say they now support Trump.  Among the switching voters was a man who said he would support Trump even though he believed him to have committed "sexual abuse" and two others who said criminal convictions in any of the charges against him would not change their minds.

Gaslighting: To Help Reelect Biden, Media Claim Trump Is Going Senile, Too.  It's quite timely that after writing on article yesterday on media bias, the following headline popped up on my MSN homepage:  "Donald Trump's cognitive decline worse than Joe Biden's due to 2 signs, professor says."  Notice what's assumed (and what's assumed is learned best) in the above headline:  We're to take it as a given that Trump is declining cognitively.  The only question is the severity.  Of course, the message here essentially IS, "Yeah, our guy Biden is senile.  But the other guy is even more senile!  Vote Incumbent Dementia!"  And that, citizens, is what you call gaslighting.  Joe Biden's cognitive decline is obvious and severe.

USA Today can't stop promoting the global warming fallacies.  [Scroll down]  Every one of these articles starts with the intentional lie that people who disagree with the radical green agenda are climate change deniers.  I have never seen anyone deny that the climate changes.  We tell the truth that the climate has always changed cyclically and naturally.  What we deny is that humans and our use of natural resources cause global warming and that warming causes the ice to melt in the Arctic and that melting will cause a massive rise in sea levels.  They also tell us that the warming causes more severe and deadly storms.  We also don't believe that politicians, bureaucrats, scientists, or anyone else can establish policies that control temperatures, sea levels, and storm activity forever.  We also don't believe the computer model predictions because previous dire predictions have not come true.

Met Office Says it Cannot Back Up its Senior Meteorologist's Claim on BBC Radio That Storms in the U.K. are "More Intense" Due to Climate Change.  The Met Office has been unable to back up a claim that storms in the U.K. are "more intense" due to the effects of climate change.  The claim was made by senior Met Office meteorologist Claire Nasir on January 22nd on BBC 5 Live Breakfast in the aftermath of Storm Isha, and led to a freedom of information request for an explanation by investigative journalist Paul Homewood.  The Met Office has replied that it is unable to answer the request due to the fact that the information "is not held".

Respect for Authorities 'Died Suddenly'.  Given the U.S. government's love affair with censorship and propaganda, I sometimes imagine future historians piecing through the shards of Western civilization in order to understand the reasons for its collapse.  According to the prevailing "narrative," everything right now is tremendously great!  We are told that the economy is strong, that crime is under control, that our borders are secure, that paying twenty bucks for a fast-food hamburger is cheap, and that endless war produces endless peace.  According to the news media, Americans have never had it so good!

Is the Electoral Fix Already In?  The fix is in.  To "protect democracy," democracy is already being canceled.  We just haven't admitted the implications of this to ourselves yet.  On Sunday, January 14th, NBC News ran an eye-catching story:  "Fears grow that Trump will use the military in 'dictatorial ways' if he returns to the White House."  It described "a loose-knit network of public interest groups and lawmakers" that is "quietly" making plans to "foil any efforts to expand presidential power" on the part of Donald Trump.  The piece quoted an array of former high-ranking officials, all insisting Trump will misuse the Department of Defense to execute civilian political aims.  Since Joe Biden's team "leaked" a strategy memo in late December listing "Trump is an existential threat to democracy" as Campaign 2024's central talking point, surrogates have worked overtime to insert existential or democracy in quotes.

Reporter Gets Torn to Shreds for Claiming 'Learn to Code' Was Never a Thing.  It's one of those cases where you know they're wrong.  You could probably ignore them, but it's the liberal media, so you attack at them like a pod of orcas.  Better yet, like orcas, play with your prey before mutilating and devouring it.  That's what's happening with some in the establishment media trying to say that "learn to code" was never a thing and that Joe Biden never said it.  Like their allies in the Democratic Party and now the Department of Justice, these people just lie.  It's a phrase created by this insular circle aimed at working Americans whose jobs were being unnecessarily targeted by Democrats, specifically Barack Obama, who declared war on coal during his presidency.  The PR pitch for destroying the livelihoods of these Americans was that job retraining would be part of their transitioning process into what Democrats feel should be our energy future.  Even labor unions know those two words are snake oil, being sold to them when NAFTA was passed to ease the growing concerns about that trade agreement.

You're Going To Get Dirty.  The trouble I find with conservatives in general and America First people is their demand that everything be pure and sparkling with virtue.  This tendency is what allowed the feds and Democrats to manipulate the January 6th protest into a riot and subsequently into an insurrection.  The immediate response to the horrible events described on that date by a well-known corrupt media should have been:  No, it isn't a riot, it isn't an insurrection, it's a peaceful demonstration.  I noticed on the very day of the event, listening on the radio (probably a federal charge under this DOJ) that the reporting went from:  "It's amazing how many people came out to support Donald Trump and protest the obviously crooked 2020 election" to "It's shameful for these protesters to violate the sanctified halls of congress" in fifteen minutes, by the same broadcaster.  That's a lack of situational awareness and a desire for liberal acceptance.

Another Bogus Border Story Goes Viral and Most Outlets Aren't in a Hurry to Issue Corrections.  The left wing response to the border crisis can be summarized as a series of misleading viral stories designed to vilify anyone who believes border control is a basic operation for a nation.  It started under Trump with the panic over "kids in cages." [...] Then there was the AOC-led campaign to re-label Border Patrol facilities "concentration camps" [...] And lets not forget the viral claim that Border Patrol agents on horeseback were whipping Hatian migrants.  This was such a big deal that President Biden promised the people who did it would pay.  [Tweet]  Once again, it never happened.  Even the photographer said so.  Sec. Mayorkas knew it hadn't happened even before he went to the White House and claimed it had. [...] Given how often the media has jumped on these stories only to have them fall out from under them, you'd think they might learn to be more careful.  But it seems that's never the case.  Two days ago another story went viral.

2023 "Earth's Hottest Year on Record" Claims Fail.  The year-end 2023 global average temperature anomaly measurement data outcomes have climate alarmist media falsely claiming these results established that "2023 Was the Hottest Year on Record" since records began in the mid-1800s.  These "hottest year on record" claims are based on misrepresenting the year 2023 obscure "global average temperature anomaly" outcome that is not applicable to any specific location or region on earth. [...] NOAA's global regional temperature anomaly data establishes that the assertion of year 2023 being the "highest ever measured average temperature anomaly" claim did not occur across the globally dominant regional land areas that include Asia, Europe, U.S., Oceania, Hawaiian Region, Arctic and the Antarctic.

ESPN [has been] forced to return 37 ill-gotten Emmy awards.  ESPN has been ordered to return 37 Emmy awards the sports network received under false pretenses.  For 13 years, ESPN committed "fraud" by submitting fake names to the credit list for the Emmys, according to the National Academy of Television Arts and Sciences (NATAS).  "Since at least 2010 ... ESPN took the awards won by some of those imaginary individuals, had them re-engraved, and gave them to on-air personalities," The Athletic reported on Thursday.  ESPN gave some of the re-engraved trophies to front-facing figures on "College GameDay," such as Lee Corso, Kirk Herbstreit, Chris Fowler, Desmond Howard, and Sam Ponder.  The report claims the on-air personalities were not aware of the scheme as ESPN higher ups convinced them they had won the awards containing their names.  Eventually, NATAS ordered ESPN to return the ill-gotten Emmys, each of which was intended for a behind-the-scenes employee who does not exist.

The Editor says...
Obviously, NATAS is Satan spelled backwards.  Just a coincidence, right?

More Lunatic Legal Coverage.  Reporters keep plunging to bizarre new lows in coverage of Donald Trump.  The new jam: his lawyer argued presidents can assassinate rivals.  Except he didn't, at all.  [Paywall]

Taking a look at my hometown data I discover the very opposite of the 'global warming' narrative is true.  The following are actual pieces of scientific data related to Springfield, Illinois, where I live:  The warmest day recorded in January is 73 degrees Fahrenheit on January 23, 1909, so every day in January, for the last 115 years, has been colder; the warmest day ever in February is February 24, 1930, when temperatures hit 78 degrees; the warmest day in March was March 21, 1907, when the temperature hit 91 degrees.  The average high temperature in Springfield today is around 36 degrees, and this weekend we are supposed to have highs around 30 degrees below normal, with wind chills around 20 below zero.  So, after 160 years of exponential growth of all the things the green pushers say cause warming, we are thirty degrees below normal.  Temperatures have always fluctuated cyclically and naturally.  Humans have no control over them, and there is no correlation between CO2 content, crude oil use, number of vehicles, and temperatures.  Yet, here is an article from two days ago, full of worthless information and repeated talking points, all to push the radical green agenda to scare people into capitulation:  ["]Earth shattered global heat record in '23 and it's flirting with warming limit, European agency says["]

Five Things Every Patriot Should Be Furious About.  [#2] The news is lying:  How can you tell if your favorite news dude/dudette is trustworthy?  Here is a hint:  see how many of these Blue Anon conspiracy theories they pushed:
  •   Trump/Russia collusion
  •   Pee-pee gate
  •   Hunter's laptop is Russian flapdoodle
  •   Ivermectin is only for horses
  •   Masks, lockdowns, and the vaccine will save lives
  •   COVID-19 came from a bat salad
  •   Unarmed grannies tried to topple the government
  •   Biden got 81 million votes and didn't even campaign.
The lying liarheads in the news are your enemy.

Separating fact from fiction on 'climate change'.  Why is it easier to find lies in the media about "climate change" than truthful information?  Why is honest reporting on the environment an outlier instead of a rule?  Media parrots have said for decades that humans, and our use of natural resources are killing the planet, and that oceans, species, and forests are dying.  They report on future predictions, but rarely on scientific facts — so I thought I would fill the vacuum.  We have been told that we are responsible for irredeemable destruction in the Great Barrier Reef, but that is not true.  The reef is making a "comeback," yet we don't see that story because it doesn't push the radical green agenda; [...] It was thinning cyclically and naturally, and it has come back cyclically and naturally.  Humans didn't cause the thinning, and government policies didn't cause the comeback — or we would see the green pushers claiming victory.

Let's Stop Using the Words: 'Trump Tried to Overturn the 2020 Election'.  After almost three years — and as Democrats in Colorado and Maine ban Donald Trump from the Centennial State's ballot — it is beyond time for the media to stop "reporting" that "Trump tried to overturn a presidential election" and to quit referring matter-of-factly: to "the election that Trump lost"; to "Trump's defeat" and his "baseless" "false claims"; and to "Trump is challenging the results" of "Biden's victory (in, say, Georgia)" and to "swing the election in his favor."  It is equally time for news organizations to stop "reporting" that the four (who's counting?) indictments are nothing more than valid or understandable (if ill-timed) reactions to punish Trump for his ("criminal") attempts to "disenfranchise voters" and thus "subvert democracy."  This is not a neutral, objective, and non-partisan view of of the facts of the 2020 election.  Far from it.  No.  It is the (self-serving) DNC version.  It is akin to asking "When did you stop beating your wife?"  Phrases like "baseless fraud claims," "sham election investigations," and "false claims of election fraud" come straight from the Democrat party.

Waking Up to the Age of Deception.  Each day in this "Age of Deception" constantly raises challenges in finding reliable information.  The 2024 election has already demonstrated that disinformation will be used regarding the economy, climate, immigration, voting, and woke thinking.  The legal attacks against former president Donald Trump are a example of vicious deception.  Another example where truth has become a minor consideration is the Israel/Gaza conflict.  We are shown scores of contradictory reports, each of them appealing to our most primitive emotions.  Fake news identification has expanded due to the growth of digital communication and social media.  In the field of journalism, information is power.  It doesn't matter whether it is true or not, only that it is persuasive.  Individuals now have a wider range of news sources, which disseminate biased perspectives.  The echo chamber effect gives self-proclaimed attention seekers the power to spread their deceptive message.

Democrats and Media Deceptively Change Trump's Word 'Retribution' to 'Revenge'.  The latest misinformation that the Democrat "news"-media colluders (hereafter the DNC) to smear Donald Trump before the 2024 election is that Trump called for "revenge" for his political opponents if wins re-election in 2024.  Brett Samuels in The Hill says that "Trump signals he's out for revenge in his second term."  The Daily Mail and the left-wing The Guardian, both in the U.K., makes the same accusation.  Politico states that in a second term, Trump will be seeking revenge.  Felon Michael Cohen, now a regular useful expert guest on CNN, stated to Jake Tapper that he could be the target of Trump's revenge, to which Jake replied, "That has occurred to me too" (thereby admitting that his view of Trump is tainted by self-interest).  The Washington Post, which used to be a newspaper, reports that Trump and his allies plot revenge" in his second term.  The Huffington Post announces that Trump "vows vengeance" against "vermin" in his second term.  CNN states ominously that in his second term Trump will use his justice department "for revenge."

Tesla 'Recall' Is Nothing of the Sort.  If you have any doubt that the MSM and online influencers have it out for Elon Musk, all you need to do is search Google for the fake news about a Tesla "recall."  The news is everwhere.  Tesla must "recall" almost every vehicle they ever sold, proving that the product is defective and that Elon Musk is a total fraud or something.  It is, of course, total bunkum.  That is not even remotely true. [...] I admire that Musk built a new car company out of almost nothing and made it successful.  That's a tough task, and the argument that he did it on the backs of American taxpayers is a bit rich, given how big the subsidies the feds have tossed at other American carmakers.  But as for the cars or the company?  Other than wishing I had invested in the company years ago since I could have easily retired by now if I had done so, I have no special affinity.  With that said I have to laugh at the claim that the feds are issuing a recall on all Teslas, as if owners were being forced to bring their cars into the shop to get some work done.

Reporter Kiera Butler is a Disinfo Dupe.  Kiera Butler is a journalist on a crusade to "save the world" from Donald Trump, "Russian disinformation," and those dangerous "anti-vaxxers."  However the real danger is within the mix of truth, lies, and spin that Butler combines in her reporting at Mother Jones.  Rather than having certain fields in which she seems to excel, Butler's reporting tends to take a confrontational tone in claiming the latest mainstream "current thing" topic is unquestionably correct and anyone questioning it is stupid or has bad intentions.  This type of slippery journalism that seems more concerned with taking sides than the truth is dishonest but also brings us face-to-face with the loss of values such as free speech and civil liberties.

Telemundo Omitted That Killer of Texas Cheerleader Is Here Illegally.  One of the most egregious form of business-interest bias in Spanish-language media occurs when it is deemed necessary to conceal the immigration status of the suspect of a heinous crime.  Such is the case with Telemundo blatantly omitting that the recently-arrested killer of a 16-year-old Texas cheerleader was in the country illegally.  [Video clip]

Reporter claimed Gaza couldn't use cell phones, spokesman proves her wrong.  Major Doron Spielman from the IDF spoke to Sky News about the resumption of fighting against Hamas in Gaza. [...] On the question of Gazan residents being notified of IDF targets while not having power to power up their mobile phones or Wi-Fi, Major Spielman responded, "I think that you and all of your viewers saw our hostages being paraded through the streets as they were released to Israel over those seven nights.  Hundreds of Gazans were holding their phones and videoing them, so clearly, there's enough power to power their phones when they're parading our hostages throughout Gaza.  Now that same power to their phones will be used to get the maps downloaded and look at the flyers [giving them information on IDF attacks]."

Sports Illustrated Published AI-Generated Articles Under Fake Names.  Sports Illustrated was once the benchmark for sports content but today the site has been accused of publishing AI-generated content under the names of authors who are also AI-generated.  Case in point, Drew Ortiz who had a photo and an author biography on the site.  ["]Outside of Sports Illustrated, Drew Ortiz doesn't seem to exist.  He has no social media presence and no publishing history.  And even more strangely, his profile photo on Sports Illustrated is for sale on a website that sells AI-generated headshots, [...]["]

More Media Malpractice.  One of the major reasons why Americans are divided and hostile toward each other is that we live in alternate universes.  Not literally, but functionally.  We have all seen the polls that show Americans have been losing trust in the MSM for a long time.  Only 36% of Americans say they have a "great deal" or "fair amount" of trust in the MSM, but this fact hides an important distinction: the majority of Democrats trust the MSM, while Republicans have given up on getting anything remotely close to the truth from the MSM.  Republicans have earned their distrust not just because they are often lied about and can't help but notice this fact, but also because they are literally unable to avoid getting the majority of their news from MSM news sources, while consciously exposing themselves to alternative points of view.  Democrats rarely do.  They automatically distrust alternative or conservative media and tend to trust without question what they hear from the MSM. This is not because they are universally stupid or uninterested in the news, but because they are inclined to trust the "misinformation" narrative.

Do we even know what we're dealing with?  If you lived in a cave and the only thing you could view was cable news, what would you see?  That's easy:  Donald Trump, Climate Change, and so-called Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion issues.  There is no fourth place.  These three subjects reliably suck up virtually all the oxygen.  They also serve to misdirect, miseducate, and mis-prioritize our country against the genuine perils aligning against us.  This isn't surprising.  With few exceptions, America's journalists graduated from many of those same radical hotbeds of anti-Americanism that are now, for the first time, showing their true colors.  Students, graduates, and faculty will need a generation or more to grasp the truth if they ever do.

Sidney Powell Didn't Flip on Trump or MAGA.  It is alarming (although not surprising) to see the misinformation in headlines, new articles, and on social media about Sidney Powell's plea in Georgia last week.  Even good Republicans and MAGA supporters seem confused and misinformed about the facts of her plea, many believing she has disavowed her position on the 2020 election and betrayed her supporters or that she has "flipped" on Trump.  First, let's be very clear that Sidney did not plead guilty to a conspiracy with Donald Trump to unlawfully overturn the 2020 election. [...] Claims she flipped on Donald Trump are outlandish and without basis.  We say that someone has flipped when a defendant agrees to testify/incriminate someone else in exchange for a lighter charge or suggested lighter sentence.  But Sidney's plea agreement is for conduct unrelated to Donald Trump and only tenuously related to even Sidney herself.  Simply put:  Sidney agreed to take the rap for the disputed access to Fulton County machines.  Second, keep in mind that Sidney's plea is different from the other pleas.  The media has been reporting on each plea as if each co-defendant is caving and pleading to the same serious charges — admitting the fight for election integrity was a fraud and there was a conspiracy with Trump.  This is not true.

Media Erase Killing Of Jewish Man Like They Erased The Violence Of 2020's Race Riots.  Corporate media banded together on Tuesday to cover for Hamas apologists after a 69-year-old Jewish man was killed due to injuries he sustained at an anti-Israel demonstration in California over the weekend.  Videos show emergency responders in Thousand Oaks, California loading Paul Kessler, who reportedly carried an Israeli flag at the protest, into an ambulance while the anti-Israel crowd chanted and waved Palestinian flags near a pool of his blood on the ground.  At least one police officer was seen trying to discourage a man yelling in a megaphone from disturbing the scene.  [Tweet]  The pro-Palestine demonstrator who allegedly interacted with Kessler has not been publicly identified or arrested but Sheriff James Fryhoff did confirm during a press conference on Tuesday that the 50-year-old's house is being searched.  "These witnesses provided conflicting statements about what the altercation and who the aggressor was," Sheriff James Fryhoff said.  The Ventura County Sheriff's Office, which might investigate the incident as a hate crime, said witness accounts suggest that "Kessler fell backwards and struck his head on the ground."

World 'Recoiling in Horror' at IDF; Nets Smear Israel Not Being in 'Mood to Compromise'.  Between Sunday and Monday, the major broadcast networks of ABC, CBS, and NBC used their flagship morning and evening newscasts to start a new week of anti-Israel smears and siding with Hamas terrorists as Tuesday marks one month since the latter's animalistic barbarism murdered at least 1,400 innocents and resulted in over 200 hostages.  This time, the networks argued the world's "recoiling in horror" at Israel's 'search and destroy mission" that's "shattering...lives" in Gaza and Israel remaining still "not" being in a "mood to compromise" with Hamas.

The Corrupt Media Tried to Implicate Me in a Mass Shooting Because a Psychopath 'Liked My Tweets'.  According to reporters, producers and editors at major news organizations, my Twitter, which is full of my disapproval of leftists and their policies — somehow contributed to the deaths and injuries of innocent people in Lewiston, Maine.  Those same people would have you then believe that had other conservative commentators and I only not run our mouths, none of his actions would have occurred. [...] Caving or even becoming complacent to the constant attacks and spin from the left will never get us out of the situation we're in.  In the middle of record inflation that includes fuel and grocery prices that are in our faces every single day — it's important to know that we are in an information war with the very people who have traditionally been the providers of information.  And while they're the first to scream "disinformation" at stories they disagree with — they're also the ones who are first to serve us disinformation.

We Must Learn to Ignore the Colin Kaepernick Media Narrative.  The news cycle has been full of stories about Colin Kaepernick and the latest speculation of his signing with another football team.  These stories are similar to those that have circulated for the past seven years.  To recap, Colin Kaepernick played quarterback for the San Francisco 49ers until he was benched and released in 2016. He's also known for his protests against the police by kneeling during the National Anthem.  Nothing else has happened for seven years.  Nothing.  The story has not really been about Colin Kaepernick at all.  The story has been (and is) about how the establishment media creates news out of nothing, and keeps the narrative on life support long after the patient has died.  Since 2016, while nothing was happening, we have been bombarded with "news" stories anticipating yet another milestone in Kaepernick's career.  From reading seven years of headlines, a reader would conclude that Kaepernick has actually played football for various teams during that time.  An October story announced "NFL world reacts as Colin Kaepernick makes major move."  But, if one reads the actual story, one would see that there was no "major" anything behind the headline.  The headlines that pop up on our mainstream news (MSN) home pages are designed to plant a seed in the minds of people too busy to click and read the actual story.

The Editor says...
That's why you shoud be able to spot a click-bait headline and ignore it.

22 Years of Blowback from the USA Patriot Act.  [Scroll down]  News cycle distractions are calibrated to ensure that you lose sight of what the government is doing.  The average American has a hard time keeping up with and remembering all of the "events," manufactured or otherwise, which occur like clockwork and keep us distracted, deluded, amused, and insulated from the reality of the American police state.  Whether these events are critical or unimportant, when we're being bombarded with wall-to-wall news coverage and news cycles that change every few days, it's difficult to stay focused on one thing — namely, holding the government accountable to abiding by the rule of law — and the powers-that-be understand this.  In this way, regularly scheduled trivia and/or distractions that keep the citizenry tuned into the various breaking news headlines and entertainment spectacles also keep them tuned out to the government's steady encroachments on their freedoms.

Here's Why The Media's Lies About Rep. Jamaal Bowman Should Concern You.  During a series of contentious spending votes on Saturday ahead of a looming government shutdown, while House Democrats were trying to slow-walk a vote, Democrat Rep. Jamaal Bowman pulled a fire alarm in a House office building on Capitol Hill, forcing an evacuation.  Bowman's stunt, which is under investigation by Capitol Police, was caught on a security camera.  It's clear he pulled the fire alarm as a delaying tactic, precisely to force the evacuation of the building and disrupt official congressional business (the kind of thing the media would call an "insurrection" if a Republican had done it.) [...] But here's the important thing:  Bowman's claim is that he thought pulling the fire alarm would open the door.  That sounds like an outlandish lie, doesn't it?  The sort of patently false thing no one in his right mind would ever believe or even try to explain.  Just a bone-crushingly idiotic fiction that requires us to believe Bowman is mentally ill or psychotic.  Every single person in Washington knows it's not true.  And yet, every single Democrat and the entire corporate news media immediately responded as if it were a reasonable and acceptable explanation for Bowman's actions, like of course he didn't know what would happen when he pulled the alarm.  He thought it would open the door, OK?  How many of us have encountered a locked door and immediately pulled the nearest fire alarm?

Please Stop Telling Us Everything Is Fine With the Economy.  Two weeks ago, Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman told CNN anchor Christiane Amanpour there is a peculiar disconnect between how the economy is doing and how the public is feeling about it. [...] People think the economy is bad because they are paying, at least here in western Pennsylvania, $3.99 a gallon for gas, and in places such as Arizona, where the state now ranks seventh among the nation's highest-paying markets at $4.69; last week alone it climbed 14 cents a gallon.  In Nevada, it jumped a whopping 33 cents a gallon, with California coming in at a 29-cents-a-gallon jump.  When gas prices rise, food prices rise.

Bring back the chaos then.  Less than a month after President Trump's inauguration, Time magazine rolled out the Democrat-RINO message of a chaotic White House.  Its proof was as thin as the hair atop John Fetterman's head.  Time reported, "Federal judges in four courts froze a hastily issued Executive Order barring certain immigrants from entering the country.  Intelligence officials leaked descriptions of classified intercepts in a winning attempt to force Trump to fire his National Security Adviser, Michael Flynn, who had misled the nation about his ties with a Russian diplomat.  Then more leaks came, from current and former officials to the New York Times, asserting that Trump campaign aides and senior Russian intelligence officials had been in contact during the 2016 presidential campaign. [...]"  That was not chaos.  That was sabotage by the deep state and its seditious resistance.  The leaks were illegal and impossible to fact-check.  But reporters claim they need access and so they go with leaky stories regardless of how true they may be because they need access to even juicier stories that may or may not be true.

Univision Host Amplifies Florida Curriculum Hoax In Fox News GOP Debate.  The Univision co-host of the Fox News Republican presidential debate reinforced false leftist narratives Wednesday night when pressing Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis on his state's K-12 curriculum.  Univision's Ilia Calderon implied DeSantis promoted educational standards that suggested slavery benefitted the victims.  The question emanates from claims Vice President Kamala Harris fabricated this summer.  "Florida's new Black History curriculum says 'slaves developed skills that in some instances could be applied for their personal benefit,'" Calderon said, ignoring that the left-wing College Board has apparently made nearly identical statements.  "You have said, 'Slaves developed skills in spite of slavery, not because of it.'  But many are still hurt.  For descendants of slaves, this is personal.  What is your message to them?"  The Florida governor attacked the question as a "hoax" engineered by the vice president to smear Republicans as racist.

The Editor says...
Dishonest left-wing talking heads on TV often make little speeches and inject socialist talking points while pretending to ask a question.

Whose idea was it to invite Ilia Calderón?  How many Republicans watch Univision?  How many Univision viewers become Republicans?
Second GOP Debate Marred By Univision Moderator's Anti-American HATE and LIES.  The second GOP presidential primary debate Wednesday night was a case study in why the Republican Party shouldn't award debate moderation privileges to hostile and dishonest members of the liberal media.  While Fox Business Network occupied two of the moderator positions (Stuart Varney and Dana Perino), the third was given to Univision anchor Ilia Calderón.  Her questions were by far the most anti-American and dishonest; ranging from lies about gun violence being "unique" to America to blaming America for the drug trafficking at the southern border, and more.  In a question directed to North Dakota governor Doug Burgum, Calderón peddled the liberal media's BIG LIE about gun violence:  "Mental health concerns are not unique to United States.  But gun violence is."  Back here in reality, Central American and South American countries were some of the most dangerous countries in the world.  Their violence was often cited as a primary driver of illegal immigration to the U.S. According to reporting from NPR, those countries have per capita violent gun death rates many times that of the U.S.

The ten commandments of liberalism.  Liberalism has been likened to a religious movement- a secular quest for heaven on earth.  Like legitimate religions, it has its own tenets.  Thou shalt seek social justice.  We're all in this together. [...] Thou shalt embrace diversity.  Diversity is our strength.  Not really.  Diverse forces flying off in their own direction weaken a society's locus.  Strength lies in overcoming diversity. [...] Liberal activism, especially since the advent of woke progressivism, has evolved into an atheistic, fundamentalist "religion."  Fundamentalism involves strict ideologic adherence, conformity, and maintenance of an in group-out group distinction.  At its core are ideological lay preachers who confer eternal damnation onto those heretics and apostates who challenge its self-appointed role of secular clergy.  Its apostles — media, academia, HR departments — are driven by self-righteous, prejudicial, vengeful hypocrisy.  Liberal dogma knows no compromise.  Nonconformists must be silenced, forcibly if necessary.

BBC 'Disinformation' Reporter Caught Lying on Her Resume.  The BBC's so-called "Disinformation Correspondent" Marianna Spring has added yet more controversy to the corrupt "fact-checking" industry as she was caught lying on her resume.  Spring is facing claims that she filled her resume with "disinformation" about her experience in order to advance her career.  According to a report from the Daily Mail, about five years ago Spring was trying to get work as a freelancer in Moscow for U.S.-based news site Coda Story.  When Spring applied to the website's Editor-in-Chief Natalia Antelava in 2018, she said she had worked alongside BBC correspondent Sarah Rainsford.

Climate scientist:  Yes, I cooked my Nature article on global warming — and here's why.  Consider this lengthy essay an exposé of a kind of Unified Field Theory of Academia-Media Corruption.  It's not so much that Patrick T. Brown reveals any new angles, but at the Free Press, the climate scientist connects many of the dots — and from the inside, at least at the time. [...] Brown still stands behind that paper, although he has since left his job in Academia for a non-profit where he can speak and act more freely.  In the narrow confines of his paper, limited to only climate change, he writes that his paper remains accurate and useful.  But because the media and Academia establishments are now limiting all discussion of practically any natural phenomena to "climate change," much of the causes of wildfires remains undiscussed — and so, therefore, do any practical policies that would mitigate them.  That is no accident, Brown argues, and it is very well known in scientific circles: [...]

The public isn't being told the full truth about the climate threat.  Patrick Brown, the co-director of climate and energy at the Breakthrough Institute in California, has blown the whistle on an open secret about climate science:  it's biased in favour of alarmism.  He published a paper in Nature magazine on the effect of climate change on wildfires.  In it he told the truth:  there was an effect.  But not the whole truth:  other factors play a big role in fires too.  On Maui, the failure of the electric utility to manage vegetation along power lines was a probable cause of the devastating recent fires, but climate change proved a convenient excuse.  Editors at journals such as Nature seem to prefer publishing simplistic, negative news and speculation about climate change.  "It is standard practice to calculate impacts for scary hypothetical future warming scenarios that strain credibility," wrote Brown.  So, after learning this lesson the hard way when his nuanced papers were rejected, he adapted his latest to suit their apparent prejudices — and it was published.

A Preview Of How The Dishonest Media Will Lie And Mislead About Trump's Show Trials.  As we wait for the political show trials of Donald Trump to begin, it's good to remember a hard and fast rule:  Quotes and summaries of events reported by the corporate media are always either half wrong or deliberately misleading.  A perfect example of that truism was provided this week by Axios' Mike Allen, who claimed Monday that Georgia Democrat prosecutor Fani Willis included an "Easter egg" in her I'm-a-very-serious-lawyer indictment.  Allen said that a specific portion of the documents had "a twist" that "could spoil" Trump's legal team's effort to have the entire case moved to federal court, a move that could possibly secure him a more favorable jury (as opposed to the pool of "marginalized, underserved and disadvantaged" voters he would surely get in Fulton County).  That "twist" is an open letter Trump sent to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger in September 2021, which was after the former president was out of office, thus supposedly undercutting the Trump team's assertion that the criminal charges are purely federal in nature, rather than addressable at the county court level.  In that letter, the indictment notes, Trump solicited Raffensperger to "unlawfully" undo the 2020 election outcome "and announce the true winner."

Fox News and Martha MacCallum Caught Presenting Koch Brothers Activist as Fake GOP Voter in Wisconsin to Support Ron DeSantis.  By now we are all too familiar with the schemes and plots of the corporate media as they participate in the political illusion of choice game.  However, for Rupert Murdoch and Fox News debate moderator Martha MacCallum, this catch shreds the remaining little credibility they carried.  Fox News is hosting the GOP debate in Wisconsin.  During this build up segment, Martha MacCallum introduces the "random Republican voters" in Wisconsin who will watch the debate.  Except, well... there's a little problem.  MacCallum introduces Chris Lawrence as a "Wisconsin GOP voter" who seemingly supports Ron DeSantis.  However, MacCallum fails to mention that Chris Lawrence actually works for the Koch Network, who have recently pledged to spend $70 million to defeat President Trump.  Not only has Chris Lawrence worked for the Koch Network for the past 9 years, he is also the Senior Field Director for the Koch group Americans for Prosperity.  In essence, Lawrence is a political operative planted in the group by Fox News to support Ron DeSantis and make it appear like he is an innocuous voter.

A Reckoning on COVID Coverage.  [Scroll down]  In both the CDC and FDA examples, you didn't need to be a virologist or epidemiologist to expose the glaring weakness of their argument.  Yet no major conservative media did so at the time.  One Fox newscaster repeated the FDA's "You're not a horse" tweet, but he made no mention that IVM comes in human tablet form which the FDA has made hard to get.  Why not? [...] There occurred no critical analysis of an entire host of COVID issues, including lockdowns, medical establishment sabotage of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, vaccine side effects, issues with remdesivir, etc.  (A notable exception is the Epoch Times, which has offered extensive, scholarly and critical COVID coverage throughout.)  Another problem among conservative news outlets was that they routinely, robotically and uncritically printed Reuters and AP articles, taking their COVID reporting at face value.

Stop Saying That 'It Can't Happen Here' — It IS Happening Here.  But make no mistake, tyranny is here.  It's hidden by state-run news outlets that distract us from the truth with stories about little green men and Lizzo's latest chunky stunt.  They lie to Americans on their 24-hour news propaganda platforms about our own president's skullduggery with China and downplay or ignore the ramifications that chicanery presents, such as spy balloons left unfettered, a border left open, secret Chinese police stations, and more than 13,000 military-aged Chinese people flooding into our nation.  Our leaders lie to us with "The sky is falling" flapdoodle about how climate change and phantom white supremacy, not the tyranny they sponsor, will be our downfall.

The climate scaremongers:  Heatwave hysteria.  The New York Intelligencer magazine called it the 'Worldwide Heatwave', which according to the UN has 'engulfed the Northern Hemisphere'.  It was of course nothing of the sort, simply the usual mix of hot and cold weather we see every year. [...] The Telegraph made several claims which were not borne out by events.  For instance:
  [#1]   They claimed that 41.8C in Rome was a record.  However in 2005 temperatures there hit 42C.
  [#2]   They said temperatures in Sicily might reach 48C.  They got to 45C, well below the record of 48.8C.
  [#3]   They said temperatures in Madrid and Rome could reach 'mid to high 40s' — in the event, Madrid got to 39C and Rome to 41C.

Overheated.  The short version is an underwater Pacific Ocean volcano named Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai, 490 feet under the waves, massively erupted, bigger than any other modern eruption, even bigger than Mount Pinatubo.  You never heard about it since it was underwater and nobody died.  But the erupting lava instantly vaporized fantastic, unimaginable amounts of sea water, which billowed into the atmosphere, changing the water composition of Earth's atmosphere and heating it up for years. [...] But I bet you never heard anything about Hunga Tonga, did you?  Thanks, media. [...] For the first time since tracking began, the amount of water vapor in the atmosphere is pegged out at the maximum, across the board.  Here's why corporate media is ignoring the most dramatic climate even in modern history:  because you can't legislate underwater volcanoes.  You can try, but they won't listen.  So what's the fun in that?  Corporate media only exists to further political ends.  Since volcanoes aren't subject to politics, why bother?

How modern media became the world's second-oldest profession.  The New York Times (NYT) and Washington Post (WaPo), from their perch atop the liberal media pyramid as it evolved in the wake of the JournoList, drove the content of the rest of the mainstream media ecosystem.  CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, NPR, HuffPo, Slate, Politico, and myriad other liberal outlets took their lead from NYT and WaPo.  As such, seeding a story in either of these outlets guaranteed media saturation.  It's widely recognized that NYT is the outlet of choice for the FBI and the national law enforcement (DOJ...) blob, while WaPo is the go-to outlet for the CIA and other elements of the national intelligence blob.  Both our law enforcement and intelligence communities worked overtime to seed the Russiagate stories, both knowing how false they were, into these outlets and into the conscience of the American public.  The question that must be asked here is, where were the real reporters?  Why would they risk their credibility reporting "stories" always laden with anonymous sources, from both the intelligence and law enforcement communities, without questioning the motives of those sources or outing them once it was known that the information they provide was false?

CNBC releases list of 'best and worst states to live in'.  CNBC recently released a remarkable ranking of "America's 10 worst states to live and work in for 2023."  Unsurprisingly, considering the source, the list consists exclusively of red states.  The rankings were purportedly based on crime rates, environmental quality, health care, quality and availability of childcare, and inclusiveness in state laws such as reproductive rights, protections against discrimination, and voting rights.  Oh, got it.  Guess we know how they weighted these factors.  Access to unfettered abortion ("reproductive rights"), worship of the LGBTQ community ("Protection against discrimination"), and the "right" to vote sans identification, via mail, and early and often, obviously superseded "crime rates."  [Lists omitted for brevity.]  Notice something oddly amusing, gentle readers?  Most of the states CNBC ranked as the worst in which to live and work are the states everyone is moving to, and several of the states it ranked as the best in which to live and work are the ones everyone is moving from.

The Left's 2020 'Fake Electors' Narrative Is Fake News.  Headlines recently proclaimed that eight of Trump's "fake" electors accepted immunity deals.  Of course, in reporting the news, the corporate outlets all missed the real story — that the electors' testimony failed to incriminate anyone, including Trump, and that the county prosecutors engaged in massive misconduct.  Equally appalling, however, was the corrupt media's continued peddling of the "fake electors" narrative.  There were no "fake" electors.  There were contingent Republican electors named consistent with legal precedent to preserve the still ongoing legal challenges to the validity of Georgia's certified vote.  Nor was appointing an alternative slate of electors some cockamamie plan devised by Trump lawyers.  On the contrary, Trump's election lawyers and the contingent electors followed the precise approach Democrats successfully used when the date Congress established for certifying an election came before the legal challenges John F. Kennedy had brought in Hawaii were decided.  And that approach allowed Kennedy to be certified the winner of Hawaii's three electoral votes on Jan. 6, 1961, even though the Aloha State had originally certified Richard Nixon the victor.

Press roosters crow about Joe Biden for a fake economic sunrise.  Washington Post columnist Catherine Rampell would have you think what Joe Biden thinks — that he is the hero of the American economy just because inflation has stopped ballooning: [...] It's garbage.  Joe Biden is still attempting to force people to buy electric cars and is handing out green goodies to people who claim they can control the climate.  There is also his intentional destruction of companies that produce reasonably priced energy.  The price of crude oil is down from its high but is still over 75% higher than it was before he took office.  (Note to Catherine: Please describe which of Biden's policies brought crude oil down.)  The price of energy affects everything.  Crude oil is used in over 6,000 products.  Statistical inflation increases have been reduced to 3% or 4% but Americans are still suffering.  He is forcing all federal projects to use prevailing wages which inflate costs.  He is taking away the ability for healthy people to buy reasonably priced health insurance policies.

Don't Believe The Leftist Media Narrative About The State of the 2024 Race.  To the surprise of no one, the leftist corporate media's coverage of the 2024 presidential race has been abysmal.  Predictably, their reporting is full of omissions, half truths, and wishful thinking.  Once again, they only report their preferred narratives, in a desperate attempt to persuade stupid people and gullible news outlets into believing them, including Conservative Inc.  As usual the leftist coastal elites are attempting to shape their perceptions into reality.

Climate Fact Check: June 2023 Edition.  Ten more false climate claims from June have already gone bust and are presented below.  [#1] Canadian forest fires caused by climate change?  Smoky American skies caused by Canadian wildfires are not new.  The historical record shows Canadian wildfires have darkened U.S. skies repeatedly since 1706. [...] [#4] Florida strawberries suffering from climate change?  As shown in the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) chart [not seen here], Florida's strawberry harvests increased nearly 50 percent between 2001 and 2019.  [#5] Summers getting hotter?  The New York Times reported in "Tracking Dangerous Heat in the U.S." that: "Summer temperatures have become hotter and more extreme in recent decades."  Fact Check.  The New York Times uses the 1951-1980 global cooling period as the baseline temperature and ignores hot summers before 1940.

The Big Gaslight.  The term "gaslighting" was just selected word of the year because of its overuse.  But why would that usage increase have happened?  Maybe because the practice itself has become more common as a political weapon.  In practical parlance, "gaslighting" means trying to persuade others not to believe their "lying eyes," or not to believe what they already had known as established fact.  Recent examples of such disinformation themes include:
  •   The summer 2020 riots were not really riots but "mostly peaceful" demonstrations.
  •   The Hunter Biden laptop emails are not real but instead a Russian disinformation tactic.
  •   The U.S. southern border is closed.
  •   It was Republicans, not Democrats, who favored defunding the police.
  •   Voter ID requirements are actually voter suppression.
  •   Critical Race Theory is not really racist — and is not being taught in schools anyway.
  •   The Afghanistan surrender/retreat was really a great achievement and success.
Curiously, all these familiar ploys are authored by the same political camp.

13 Reasons Joe Biden Isn't The 'Ethical' President Time Magazine Claims.  The corporate media kicked off the week with another outrageous story to spin President Joe Biden, the man guilty of politically persecuting his chief political opponent and potentially selling American policy out to foreign adversaries, as an "ethical" president.  Biden is "reset[ting] the guardrails against ... abuses of power" and "increas[ing] public trust in government," reads a Time magazine article unironically titled, "Biden Is Resetting the Ethical Norms Trump Trampled as President."  "President Biden is proud to have restored respect for the rule of law and will not exploit his office with convention events on the White House lawn," Deputy Press Secretary Andrew Bates told the magazine.  "He will not exploit his office for political gain in the way that we saw in the last administration," Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre added.  Below are 13 reasons Biden is not "ethical," and may in fact go down as one of the most corrupt and immoral presidents in American history.

The press just can't stop propping up Democrats.  I bet no one can recall when the media tried to help George Bush's and Donald Trump's poll numbers.  Nope, they continued their efforts to push them down because they always campaign for Democrats.

The Liberal Media Need Shock Treatment.
  •   The IRS whistleblowers in the Hunter Biden matter are ignored by the liberal media.
  •   Biden steals thousands of classified documents — without the authority to declassify them — when he was a senator and vice-president and the story disappears.
  •   FBI insiders bravely reveal the blatant pro-Democratic bias of the organization and their testimony is sloughed off.
  •   Joe Biden commits one embarrassing verbal gaffe after another, demonstrating an unarguable diminution of mental acuity, and the video clips are nowhere to be seen on the mainstream stations.
  •   James Comer finds one ironclad, tangible example after another of inappropriate, even illegal, financial dealings by the entire Biden family and Comer's investigation is dismissed by the liberal media as unfounded hearsay.
  •   Talk of the 2016 presidential election being stolen by President Trump from Hillary is hailed as heroic, patriotic protest, but presenting the mountains of indisputable evidence of 2020 election fraud committed by the Democrats against President Trump gets you branded as a traitor by the mainstream media.
This list of examples could go on and on, but for the sake of brevity and current relevance, we'll leave it there.

Here's How You Know Conservatives Are Winning.  If you want a good indication that conservatives are, at long last, scoring a few actual victories these days, look at the apoplexy it's causing those on the left.  A prime example is a piece written by Jill Lawrence, a former editor at USA Today, which posted on July 4 on MSNBC and carried the scary title:  "Seeing the erosion of our freedoms makes it hard to celebrate this Fourth of July."   It is a remarkable display of fearmongering, incoherence, and illogic.  "The Supreme Court, conservative governors and gerrymandered state legislatures are racing to shrink fundamental rights and freedoms," Lawrence writes.  "The result is that tens of millions of Americans are being deprived of rights that other Americans have.  The scale of the disparity is frightening and growing."  Ok.  So, how about some examples?

Has the mainstream press lost all desire to investigate climate alarmist claims?  Being something of a questioning soul, I have found mainstream news sources somewhat unsatisfactory in recent years — banal reporting, simplistic (and error-strewn) reporting and homages to vested interests have turned me off the commonly used channels for consuming the output of the fourth estate.  Having leafed through various fairly anodyne articles that mostly avoided the difficult questions of the day, tucked away on page 36 was a small article by the environment editor of The Times entitled "Antarctic Ice Melts to 'Shocking' Low".  Intrigued — because there are some fascinating observations coming from the world's oceans that are worthy of closer investigation — I read the article in more detail.  I was genuinely astonished.  Not, I should say, by the quality of the article, or the incisiveness of the reporting.  I was astonished by the extent — not of any ice loss — but of the twisting of facts to fit an agenda.  Bereft of nuance, we seem to be spiralling into a polarised world where broadsheet 'journalism' can see fit to distill context-free factoids into an easily-digestible apocalyptic pill to be popped down a reader's gullet: [...]

Under Biden, Fake News Soars to Whole New Level.  "Biden calls China's Xi a dictator; Beijing slams remark as 'provocation,'" headlined the Washington Post on June 20.  "Biden calls Xi a dictator, who was kept in the dark about spy balloon," chimed in the New York Times. [...] That is not exactly the same as saying "China's Xi Jinping is a dictator," or "Xi Jinping is like other dictators." Contrary to what the reports assume, Xi Jinping would have no problem with the label.  The People's Republic of China is a Communist country, and in Marxist-Leninist doctrine the dictatorship of the proletariat rules.  Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping, Jiang Zemin, Hu-Wen and Xi Jinping are all totalitarian dictators in the true sense.  Marxist-Leninist doctrine allows no party but the Communist Party, and the Party decides who will run the show.  Xi Jinping is the man of the hour, and the notion he "didn't know" about the balloon is ludicrous.

Living in a Media World.  From National Public Radio (aka state radio), I've gained information that while guns are dangerous in the hands of most of our fellow citizens, they are necessary for transgendered Americans, who must stockpile them because of "hateful rhetoric."  Our brave sexual pioneers are being constantly threatened by Christian bigots and other vicious obscurantists.  NPR has also taught me that whatever riots followed the killing of George Floyd were mostly peaceful and that the slaying of Jordan Neely by Daniel Penny was driven by contempt for a minority member struggling with mental illness.  The transgendered youth who murdered six people, including three children, in a Christian school in Nashville did not really cause this "tragedy."  The non-binary shooter was a victim of Christian prejudice and "the gun lobby," and what he did out of emotional desperation led to "an escalation of hate" against the LGBT community.  Yesterday I had the scales fall further from my eyes when I discovered that Hunter Biden had not committed a host of felonies, some of which implicated his dad.  Hunter is a recovering drug addict whom Joe Scarborough on MSNBC is defending against "hyperventilating right-wingers" who have taken their playbook from Joe McCarthy[.]

Did You Breathe Smoke Last Week?  This is Why.  Michael Walsh published the below piece on his the-pipeline.org last week, and in the meantime, the propaganda press has issued one full-throated [objection] after another.  I scan them, not one single writer has ever been to a forest, he is grabbing paras from another, and another grabs another paragraph, all ending in a mess of words that add up to something issued from the WEF's PR Department.  I thought for a split second Jim Geraghty at National Review would be sensible.  He was not.

Media blames 'climate change' for Canadian wildfires despite arrest of multiple arsonists.  Despite the arrest of multiple arsonists, the mainstream media in Canada seems intent on attributing the nation's recent wildfires to "climate change."  As wildfires continue to spread across western, and now central and eastern Canada, burning forestland and homes, the mainstream media continues to imply that climate change is the main culprit, despite a growing number of reports showing that arsonists have been arrested for allegedly setting dozens of fires.

Target Received Bomb Threats From the 'LGBTQ+ Community.' The Media Told a Different Story.  Target stores across America were evacuated over the weekend due to bomb threats that alleged the chain had "betrayed the LGBTQ+ community" and "bowed to the wishes of far-right extremists who want to exterminate us," according to police.  But that's not how some major news outlets presented the story.  The Washington Post, USA Today, and others buried or simply left out the nature of the emailed threats, all of which were false alarms, while prominently mentioning conservative backlash over Target's LGBT Pride merchandise.

The Leftist Green Agenda Is Buying Its Way Into The News.  One recent analysis found AP stories mentioned the phrases "climate change," "global warming," and "Climate disaster" hundreds of times since receiving grants totaling $8 million in early 2022.  The stated purpose of the money is to fund the AP's "Climate Journalism Initiative," which would employ 20 new reporters to "transform how the AP covers the climate story."  Perhaps it also funded the story that gave us Biden's hard-hat environmentalism?  In another example from the story, former top Clinton adviser John Podesta is heavily quoted in his role as overseer of the $369 billion for green energy from Biden's so-called Inflation Reduction Act.  The story fails to mention Podesta's political operative past, including his unofficial title of "White House clean-up chief" during the Clinton years.  Also quoted are the extreme eco-groups the Natural Resources Defense Council and Center for Biological Diversity.  They are all given a lot of space in a story with a lot of reach.  As a wire service, the hard-hat rebranding from the AP will appear in thousands of newspapers across the world as news.  We don't know if the millions the AP received for climate coverage played a role in helping Biden rebrand his energy policy, and that's precisely the point.

Blame the Media for the National Debt.  Democrats and Republicans reached an agreement to lift the debt ceiling, and nothing is going to change in the disturbing pattern of America's national debt climbing by leaps and bounds.  The best reason for pessimism?  Our Democrat-messaging media.  They can't be bothered to offer the most basic facts in budget coverage.  What is the budget for the current fiscal year?  What was the last budget deficit?  How large is the national debt?  These are questions that are rarely answered by news anchors.  What we get is a lot of horse-race jockeying and finger-pointing instead of facts.  They must think the viewers are too stupid to juggle numbers.

'The Official Truth': The End of Free Speech That Will End America.  According to a survey by Rasmussen Reports, 59% of likely voters in the United States view the corporate news media as "truly the enemy of the people."  This is a majority view, held regardless of race:  "58% of whites, 51% of black voters, and 68% of other minorities" — all agree that the mainstream media has become their "enemy."  This scorching indictment of the Fourth Estate piggybacks similar polling from Harvard-Harris showing that Americans hold almost diametrically opposing viewpoints from those that news corporations predominantly broadcast as the official "truth."

Big Picture Explanation of What Happened in the Past 15 Years.  In the 50 years that preceded 2008, those same groups had an approach of distrust toward government, and the media apparatus had a very distinct supportive and cynical outlook, favorable to the leftist anti-government perspective.  Now, all of that has reversed — seemingly flipped.  In the 50 years that preceded 2008, media pushed a one-way narrative in defense of those who were "targeted" by the institutions and mechanisms of government.  As the activists railed against the regime, the media framed narratives to excuse the transparently guilty.  Now, that entire dynamic has reversed.  Now we see the media pushing a narrative in support of weaponized government targeting, and — here's the kicker — framing the transparently innocent.  The activists went from accusing government of wrongdoing and defending the transparently guilty — to aligning with government, excusing government wrongdoing, and helping to attack the transparently innocent.

Corporate Media's Coverage Of The Debt-Limit Fight Is Intolerably Dishonest.  [Scroll down]  Biden and Chuck Schumer gambled that Republicans would never unify around a debt-ceiling hike.  Schumer kept snarkily demanding McCarthy show the public his plans.  House Republicans did — one that "slashes" spending all the way back to 2022 levels and then allows one percent increases per year moving forward.  Everyone on the left, which is to say most people in political journalism, keep framing the debate as if this never happened.  So while we can't bore into the souls of the participants and expose their true feeling about a potential default, the fact is that the only people in that entire conversation who have already passed a hike to the debt limit are House Republicans.  Democrats could just sign off on it if they wanted.  No default.  No one, of course, expects Democrats to unilaterally surrender.  But media always covers negotiations over spending as if the organic center, the endpoint, the only reasonable place to be, stands not between the desires of two competing political parties or two competing branches of government but rather wherever Democrats happen to reside.

Harris-Harvard poll: liberal corporate media is radically out of touch with the views of Americans.  It's not just that corporate media rejects Americans' views.  They don't permit those views to be heard.  To start:  Majorities of Americans say it's *false* that Trump colluded with Russia.  The the Steele Dossier is also "false."  In other words, they view the story the US media aggressively centered for 3 years as a hoax and a fraud, yet NBC and CNN won't even air this view.  Americans also believe that the materials on the Hunter Biden laptop are real, and are not and never were "Russian disinformation."  So again, Americans view the claim that the US corporate media and CIA spread for weeks before the 2020 election — to help Biden win — as a fraud.  Majorties of Americans also believe:
  •   Hunter Biden engaged in criminal influence peddling using his father's name.
  •   The FBI is not investigating these crimes.
  •   Joe Biden participated in Hunter's illegal influence peddling and profiteering schemes.

Moscow on the Potomac.  Picture living in the Soviet Union circa 1980.  You wake up and turn on state-run radio.  The great war in Afghanistan is going exceptionally well.  You know that story is a lie, as your neighbors just buried their son, and your cousin tells of the horrors of fighting the Mujahideen in the frozen mountains.  The next story speaks of the great economic success of the most recent Five Year Plan.  You know that it's also a lie, as there has been no meat in the local stores for weeks, and the lines outside of bakeries are only getting longer. [...] Now, let's move to the present-day US. You get up and turn on any of the morning programs with the presenters who do not know how to stop smiling.  They tell us that the war in Ukraine is so successful that the US and its allies will be sending a few billion dollars more in weaponry shortly.  Next, you learn that inflation is actually good for you, as it is proof of a successful economy.  You see that many items that you used to buy are too expensive, but hey, but now you know it's a good thing.  And forget about baby formula.

An Appeal to the Thinkers Left Politically Abandoned.  [Scroll down]  No matter your political beliefs, you likely align yourself with one of these three broad philosophies [Conservatism, Progressivism, Independent].  News stories would make you think the nation is ideologically split down the middle though, between right and left.  However, 25% identify as Liberal or Progressive, while 73% of Americans identify as conservative or moderate.  You wouldn't be aware of this if you relied on Democrat messaging and a breathless press that constantly "informs" you otherwise.  Moderates historically defect from conservative thought when mainstream outlets do not report important news, or slant events unfavorably.

TV portrays Covid vax victims as Coronavirus deaths.  The three screenshots below come from the closing one-minute segment of the nightly news show News Watch 9 on NHK, the Japanese equivalent to the BBC, which aired on Monday.  The segment title in the top-right reads "Various feelings about returning to normality."  The full segment (which can be viewed with English subtitles [elsew]here) is a montage of footage contrasting Tokyo streets deserted during states of emergency and now full of tourists in addition to the three bereaved people below and photos of their dead family members.  You get the idea.  Now, based on what NHK shows them saying, what would you assume their family members died from?  If you assumed they died from Covid, as the millions of NHK viewers who saw the segment doubtlessly did, you'd be completely wrong.  The three people above are actually members of the Bereaved Families of Covid Vaccination Victims that I wrote about in November.  But the segment didn't mention that fact or anything about vaccines.  NHK's creatively deceptive editing generated such a tsunami of criticism on social media that it issued an apology at the end of News Watch 9 the following night.

CNN shows Anderson Cooper 360 and Primetime make NO mention of discredited FBI probe into baseless Trump-Russia claims network previously claimed were 'corroborated'.  Struggling CNN spent all of primetime ignoring John Durham's investigation that tore apart the FBI for launching a baseless probe into claims of Donald Trump's collusion with Russia.  The network's two highest profile nightly shows - Primetime and Anderson Cooper 360 - each failed to mention the probe by the special counsel in two hours of programming.  CNN was among liberal media outlets obsessed with Trump-Russia collusion claims when they first emerged, with since-fired former anchor Don Lemon claiming the infamous Steele Dossier had been partly corroborated.

The Left's 2020 'Fake Electors' Narrative Is Fake News.  Headlines recently proclaimed that eight of Trump's "fake" electors accepted immunity deals.  Of course, in reporting the news, the corporate outlets all missed the real story — that the electors' testimony failed to incriminate anyone, including Trump, and that the county prosecutors engaged in massive misconduct.  Equally appalling, however, was the corrupt media's continued peddling of the "fake electors" narrative.  There were no "fake" electors.  There were contingent Republican electors named consistent with legal precedent to preserve the still ongoing legal challenges to the validity of Georgia's certified vote.  Nor was appointing an alternative slate of electors some cockamamie plan devised by Trump lawyers.  On the contrary, Trump's election lawyers and the contingent electors followed the precise approach Democrats successfully used when the date Congress established for certifying an election came before the legal challenges John F. Kennedy had brought in Hawaii were decided.  And that approach allowed Kennedy to be certified the winner of Hawaii's three electoral votes on Jan. 6, 1961, even though the Aloha State had originally certified Richard Nixon the victor.  The Hawaii scenario in 1960 mirrors in every material respect the facts on the ground in Georgia on Dec. 14, 2020 — the date both the Democrat and Republican presidential electors met and cast their 16 electoral votes for Joe Biden and Donald Trump respectively.

Weaponizing Death.  Recently, there has been a spate of horrific murders.  The killers, whether committing mass shootings or single homicides, are hard to stereotype. [...] Unfortunately, these tragedies have increasingly become politicized.  Yet our media and politicians do not apply a common standard of reporting about either the victims, the killers, or the apparent motives and circumstances of the violence.  Instead, each horror is quickly analyzed for its political usefulness.  Then its details are selectively downplayed or emphasized, depending upon the political agenda at work.  A sad example was the terrible murder spree at the private Christian Covenant School in Nashville, Tennessee.  A transgender male shot and killed six people, including three 9-year-old children.  Almost immediately, three media narratives emerged.  One, semi-automatic weapons, not the killer Audrey Hale, were mostly responsible for the massacre.  Two, the shooter's transgender identity profile played no role in the killing whatsoever.  Three, the public had no need to know of the contents of the shooter's "manifesto."

Biden's corrupt?  The MSM shrugs.  The MSM spent 3 years promoting a narrative that they knew was false about Donald Trump colluding with Russia.  Not one of them could possibly believe that it was true because it was so transparently a lie.  Yet they, the intelligence community, and every talking head spoke breathlessly about how the walls were closing in on Trump.  It took the Special Counsel to set them straight, and they still have their Pulitzer Prizes and half the country still believes their lies.  Yet Representative James Comer lays out a straightforward, obvious case that might not stand up in court yet but is clearly true that Joe Biden and his family have engaged in a corrupt influence peddling operation going back over a decade and the press not only shrugs but comes to the president's defense.  Comer didn't pass the "beyond the shadow of a doubt" standard, so it is a big nothing.  Look away.  Those millions of dollars from foreign nationals just MIGHT conceivably be legal or something.  [Tweet]

Most of the media doesn't care about anything unless the story fits their radical leftist agenda.  Every day we hear that there have been hundreds of mass shootings in the U.S this year yet we see the details on only a few.  Why don't we ever see the details of all the mass shootings in Chicago and elsewhere that involve black gang members shooting other blacks?  Why don't we see the names of the victims, the records of the shooters, and the motives?  The answer is it doesn't fit the agenda.  We see little interest in all the subway and street crimes in New York each day, but when a white Marine hero gets involved to protect people from a mentally ill, black, career criminal and accidentally kills him, he is accused of murder and there is endless coverage and violent protests.  A Hispanic commits a mass murder in Texas, and he has magically been converted to a white supremacist and we get huge coverage.  It reminds me of when the media converted the Hispanic shooter George Zimmerman to white in order to gin up racial hate and division.  When a black teen, who had robbed a store in Ferguson, Mo, reached for a white cop's gun, the cop defended himself and killed the teen.  Instead of telling the truth, the media and others regurgitated the fake "hands up don't shoot" narrative to gin up racial hate and violence.  How many cops have been killed and injured because of that false narrative?

How Liars Wreck a Country.  Last year, Forbes concluded that "only 16% of adults in the U.S. say they have a great deal or quite a lot of confidence in newspapers, and just 11% said the same for television news."  Anyone confronting these stats must conclude that our media are deeply incompetent or crooked or both.  The New York Times announced a few years ago that defeating Trump was the important thing.  They gave themselves a free pass to lie all they want.  How can they now reclaim their honor or their usefulness? [...] Unfortunately, our liberal journalists do not care about true or false.  When they hear an assertion, they try to determine whether it will help their agenda... their narrative.  If it won't help, they know they must attack the assertion, typically by declaring it debunked, fake news, or misinformation.

Andy Ngô sheds light on bizarre reporting about Allen, TX mass shooter Garcia in thread.  Full transparency, this has been the craziest media push after a mass shooting in a long while, and at this time this editor can honestly not say what is and isn't the truth which is a sad reflection of what our mainstream media have become.  As Twitchy readers know, within maybe two hours of the horrific shooting in Allen, Texas, major outlets were running with the story that Garcia 'may have had white supremacist beliefs' based on a patch someone 'close to the story' said they saw on his vest.  Then came the claims about Garcia's social media and tattoos ... which are all over the place.  Not to mention we're not even sure at this point what Garcia actually looked like because there are multiple pictures of different Hispanic men floating around social media.  So all of that is by itself, insane.  Yes?  But then add in the bizarre claims about Garcia having a white supremacist account created on some Russian social media site?

In a World Gone Mad, the Jordan Neelys Rule.  Jordan Neely was a mentally ill homeless man who had terrorized the citizens of New York — especially subway passengers — for many years.  He had been arrested at least 40 times for crimes ranging from assault to disorderly conduct and fare evasion.  And on the day of his death, several eyewitnesses report that Neely had made repeated threats to the well-being of passengers, "stating his willingness to 'hurt anyone' and saying that he was unbothered by the prospect of returning to jail or being killed," according to NRO.  [Tweet]  Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez says Jordan Neely was "murdered" because he "was houseless and crying for food in a time when the city is raising rents and stripping services to militarize itself."  So passengers and bystanders are just supposed to allow Mr. Neely to terrorize and assault them with no thought of defending themselves?  You picked the wrong hobby horse to ride, AOC.  [Tweet]  AOC also didn't mention this attack on the gay community.  [Tweet]

Video Of Jordan Neely Defecating In A Subway Station, Then Walking Around Naked (NSFW).  A video of a schizophrenic homeless man, Jordan Neely, [defecating] and then walking around naked in a NYC subway station has surfaced.  The media and BLM have done their best to portray Neely as a friendly Micheal Jackson impersonator when in reality he was a dangerous individual with a long, violent arrest record with little regard for the law.  [Video clip]

Elon Musk Asks Why the Media Misrepresents Interracial Crime Stats "To Such an Extreme Degree".  Twitter CEO Elon Musk questioned on Saturday why the establishment media misrepresents interracial crime statistics "to such an extreme degree."  The media's lies and false claims result in more innocent people being killed while inciting more anti-white violence than ever. [...] Now under the control of Musk, many hate hoaxes and disinformation is being countered, including media lies regarding Jordan Neely.

The Auckland Mobbing of Kellie-Jay Keen Was Fuelled by Media-Peddled Misinformation.  Kellie-Jay Keen is a five-foot-one, British middle-aged mother of four children who happens to believe that the word "woman" should be reserved for those who are biologically female.  As many Quillette readers and podcast listeners will already know, she headlined a March 25th women's rights event in Auckland called Let Women Speak, which was shut down by protester violence.  Keen has been under fire for years from trans-rights activists (who believe that men can become women, and vice versa, by acts of self-declaration).  And many such activists in New Zealand were quick to smear Keen as a fascist, on the basis that a small group of apparent Nazis had showed up in the vicinity of one of her recent events in Australia.

Senate Republicans Accuse Democrats, Media Allies of Smear Campaign against Conservative Justices.  Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee tore into their Democratic colleagues during a Tuesday hearing on Supreme Court ethics, accusing the lawmakers of joining with their ideological allies in the media to undermine the conservative Supreme Court majority because it stands in the way of their desired policy outcomes.  The hearing was scheduled by Judiciary Committee Democrats after ProPublica published a series of articles detailing Justice Clarence Thomas's relationship with Texas billionaire Harlan Crow.  Despite the fact that Crow has not had business before the Court during Thomas's tenure — with the exception of one case that was never taken up involving a company which Crow had a minority interest in — many Democrats have seized on the report to argue that the Court should adopt stricter ethics rules to prevent undue interference.

AP redefined 'insurrection' to include J6 protests, then redefined it again to exclude TN and MT protests that disrupted legislatures.  Writing in Human Events, Libby Emmons calls out the AP for redefining the word "insurrection" to apply to the January 6, 2021 demonstrators, and then, when that definition was applied by others to the left wing demonstrations that disrupted the Tennessee and Montana state legislatures, re-redefining the term so as to solely apply to its enemies, the pro-Trump demonstrators.  I's an absolutely clear instance of AP acting as a propaganda organ for the left, not as a news agency.

A Guide to Understanding the Hoax of the Century.  For more than half a century, McCarthyism stood as a defining chapter in the worldview of American liberals:  a warning about the dangerous allure of blacklists, witch hunts, and demagogues.  Until 2017, that is, when another list of alleged Russian agents roiled the American press and political class.  A new outfit called Hamilton 68 claimed to have discovered hundreds of Russian-affiliated accounts that had infiltrated Twitter to sow chaos and help Donald Trump win the election.  Russia stood accused of hacking social media platforms, the new centers of power, and using them to covertly direct events inside the United States.  None of it was true.  After reviewing Hamilton 68's secret list, Twitter's safety officer, Yoel Roth, privately admitted that his company was allowing "real people" to be "unilaterally labeled Russian stooges without evidence or recourse." [...] When proof emerged earlier this year that Hamilton 68 was a high-level hoax perpetrated against the American people, it was met with a great wall of silence in the national press.

Those scary guns the National Guard leaker possessed?  Airsoft rifles.  This captures so much about the MSM.  It combines total ignorance and open contempt for their audience along with a determined insistence that whatever the intelligence community says must be accepted at face value.  Before I get into the story I want to make clear that am not a fan of dropping classified documents into the public realm, with the exception of whistleblowers revealing the corruption of government.  I haven't followed this story closely, so I really haven't an opinion worth sharing about the whole affair. [...] With that out of the way, I do have a strong opinion about the propaganda we are being fed, and there appears to be proof that we are being lied to.

Teixeira Whistleblower Case Raises Troubling Questions.  Last week, 21-year-old low-level Massachusetts Air National Guardsman Jack Douglas Teixeira was arrested and charged with violating the Espionage Act and leaking sensitive defense material.  Among other things, the leaked top-secret documents show that the Biden administration has been misleading the public about the reality of the situation in Ukraine, overstating the country's success in its war with Russia.  The leaked documents, which appear to include briefings prepared for senior Pentagon leadership, including Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Mark Milley, contained assessments from a multitude of agencies.  The real story, however, is how corporate media organizations, rather than focusing on the content of the revealing documents themselves, chose to focus on finding out who leaked them.  Only after first working to identify Teixeira as the alleged whistleblower, which resulted in his arrest, both The Washington Post and The New York Times began to publish "exclusive" stories about classified information — some of it still unseen by the public — that had been leaked by Teixeira as if the discovery were their own.

'Too Big to Fail' Is Too Big Period.  A recent Gallup poll found that public confidence in our institutions is collapsing.  The only institutions that still garner majority confidence are the military and small businesses.  Nearly three quarters of Americans have lost confidence in government, big business, academia, and the media (among others).  The vast majority of our institutions are failing.  They aren't failing to survive.  They're failing to meet our expectations — which means they're failing to satisfy their reason for being. [...] Media haven't lost our confidence because they're boring.  They have lost it because they are untruthful.  They are pushing a narrative and are unwilling to sell unbiased news or entertainment at any price.

The Most Important Thing To Be Learned From The Teixeira (Ukraine Docs) Leaks.  America no longer has a free press; more specifically, the vast majority of the media are simply mouthpieces for the UniParty and/or the Biden-regime:  [Tweets]  But just keep telling yourselves that 2024 will be different than 2020[,] that all we need to do is nominate Trump or all that we need to do is "move on" past Trump[,] and that magically the media that routinely LIE to us will suddenly become truth-tellers, that the ballot-harvesters will disappear, that the Democrat mega-billionaires who are literally buying votes will go back to buying super-yachts.

BBC News caught spreading Disinformation which accidentally confirms COVID Vaccination is in fact to blame for Excess Deaths.  Official UK Government data has revealed a startling truth that has left the people in a state of disbelief.  England and Wales suffered the highest number of excess deaths in over half a century in 2022, and a non-stop weekly rally of excess deaths since week 16 of 2022 that equates to 62,543 excess deaths as of March 2023.  And thanks to the BBC lying to the public, we know that the main cause of this huge increase in deaths is COVID-19 vaccination.

Elon Musk Takes Ownership of the BBC After Epic Exchange With Dishonest Reporter.  Elon Musk participated in an interview on Tuesday evening and ended up taking ownership of the BBC by the time it was over.  In an epic exchange, the billionaire worked over James Clayton, a reporter from the British network, after he attempted to push claims about "hate speech" and COVID labeling on Twitter. [...] Musk employs a strategy throughout the interview that I've long been a fan of when interacting with the mainstream press.  Namely, he doesn't accept unproven premises that set up biased questions.  When a reporter says something meant to paint you into a corner, make them prove what they are saying is even true.

Miami Herald isn't fit to be fish wrapper.  When I wrote about Rebekah Jones' son's arrest I relied upon the reporting of the Journal for the facts of the case.  I chose to do so despite there being a Miami Herald story because it was biased and left out the most important point:  he wasn't arrested for sharing memes, as they claimed, but for making threats to shoot up a school.  That's a bit different.  [Tweets]  The Herald is still soft-pedaling the story and pushing the notion that Jones is being persecuted somehow.  And Jones is tweeting up a storm with an ever-changing story.  It is a remarkable example of gaslighting, and the Herald is crying about being criticized for pushing the story of an admitted felon.

Trump Isn't A Special Case, He's A Test Case.  Liberals might be scratching their heads over why potential Donald Trump rivals are rushing to denounce his indictment.  The reason is simple.  Conservative Republicans know that if this assault is allowed to stand, they will be next.  The left, as well as the rabble of never-Trump Republicans, like to tell everybody that the unprecedented measures taken against Trump — culminating with this week's indictment — are justified because he poses a unique threat to our precious democracy.  Just to review, we're talking about measures like Democrats impeaching him twice on the flimsiest of grounds.  Like federal law enforcement engaging in a coordinated campaign to smear him as a Russian stooge.  Like journalists dropping any shred of objectivity and professionalism to attack Trump, up to and including peddling obvious falsehoods.

Ukrainian Journalist Uses Makeup And Poses People To Make Them Look Injured.  This is not the first time Ukrainians have used this tactic of using crisis actors with fake blood and makeup to make them look like war victims.  [Video clip]

How the Media Doubles Down on Falsehood.  [Scroll down]  Still, there are people who blindly believe the media.  My older brother called me this week, and, in our conversation, we talked about how people, when challenged about this, would reply, "they can't put it in the newspapers if it isn't true."  Often when you point out the error of such a statement with facts, they give you that "deer in the headlights" look.  Hopefully, some events of late might actually open some people's eyes.  In an effort to look like they are combatting this issue, we are inundated with "misinformation checkers" (aka fact checkers), who often still miss out on important facts and whose checking often leans significantly to the Left.  And what's worse is that people still believe the administration despite its disastrous impacts on our nation: readiness, strength, increased drug traffic and deaths due to the open borders, the COVID and COVID vaccine lies, the inability of almost three-quarters of our youth to even qualify for military service, long-term inflation, high energy costs, woke policies, and so on; all with a complicit media.  And still the public hasn't learned.

Not ALL reporters are trash, but...  There are isolated instances of reporters who actually do their jobs, which last I checked was to provide information to people so that they can make informed choices in their lives.  But these days those reporters are rare, and fewer and fewer exist in mainstream news organizations.  Few politicians have the gumption to call them out, because all people who are required to deal with the media follow the dictum that "it is never wise to pick fights with people who buy ink by the barrel."  That used to be true but is no longer.  Reporters don't care what you say, what is true, or whether you play nice with them.  They care about promoting whatever narrative they have in mind.  If you feed them what you want they will make you a hero; if not, expect to be savaged.

Mainstream Media's New Obsession: Labelling Criticism of 15-Minute Cities 'Conspiracy Theories'.  "Conspiracy theories" about 15-minute cities are "false", "unhinged", "dangerous" and "not to be believed", declare mainstream media in unified chorus.  "In recent years, conspiracy theories that were once almost unheard of have spread like wildfire, with a growing number of Australians now sceptical of things like vaccines, 5G and election results," News.com.au reports in one such article, titled, 'Inside the 15-minute city conspiracy theory sucking in gullible Australians'.  The article explains that 15-minutes cities (also called Smart Cities) are a common sense way of attempting to boost liveability for residents.  City dwellers in proposed Smart Cities — including Melbourne, Paris, London, Edmonton and Oxford — will have access to everything they need within a 15 to 20-minute walk, cycle or public transport trip, and that's really all there is to it.  "Anyone who has ever faced a long and painful commute will immediately see the appeal of having the daily essentials at their fingertips," the article assures readers.  However, "gullible Australians" who cannot appreciate common sense or convenience have been "sucked in" to a "dangerous conspiracy".  These "unhinged" conspiracy theorists actually believe that Smart Cities are "part of a secret plan by global elites to restrict people's freedom and movements" — a form of lockdown justified by climate action.

The Editor says...
When the government nannies tell you that "you have everything you need" in your neighborhood, they presume to know what you need, every minute of your life.  In a free country, you decide for yourself what you need, and where you would like to go.

Mainstream Journalism Is Dead, Long Live the Age of the Private Journalist.  You're more than well aware of just how deeply the mainstream media is obedient to the whims of the Democrat Party and leftist agendas.  It shamelessly pushes narratives that encourage strict obedience to the Democrat Party and even activist groups through fear and hate — with an emphasis on the "fear."  For instance, a couple of months ago, ABC News attempted to scare parents by telling them that if they don't cure their child's obesity right now, then they will have it for the rest of their lives and that includes all the health problems and issues that come with it.  The article encourages parents not to do this slowly by changing up their diet and having them get plenty of exercise, but by giving them weight loss drugs.  CBS just so happened to have a report on a new weight loss drug for kids, and it just so happened to be out at the time of the report and at your local drug store no less!

The Editor says...
That's not a news report, it's an infomercial.

Rathergate redux at the NYT?  And the media wonder why no one believes them any longer.  Earlier today, John picked up NPR's critical take on Rolling Stone's coverage of an arrest of an ABC News producer last year.  Be sure to read it if you missed it, but it's not the only mainstream media outlet that should be embarrassed this week.  Over the weekend, the New York Times dragged up the hoary conspiracy theory of the 1980 October Surprise, with a single source claiming he'd been duped into it 43 years ago — Ben Barnes.  Some readers may remember Ben Barnes from another conspiracy theory: the Texas Air National Guard (TANG) story that blew up in the faces of CBS News execs in late 2004.

Rolling Stone Magazine Faces New Journalism Scandal After Misleading Readers in a Big Way.  [Scroll down]  This is not the first time Rolling Stone has abused and discarded facts about a major story in order to (possibly) push an agenda.  The magazine landed in serious hot water several years ago after publishing a "bombshell" report about a gang rape on the University of Virginia campus.  That "bombshell," though, turned out to be entirely fabricated.  That story led to a major defamation case against the magazine.  They were found guilty, and the resulting damages ultimately resulted in the sale of the magazine.  Of course, the magazine has a well-known leftward bent, more recently calling Democrat Joe Manchin a destroyer of worlds and attacking ivermectin during the COVID-19 pandemic.  The case of Siegel's report on Meek, however, isn't so much a story of lefty reporting.  It's a story of the inherent corruption of the media in general.

Time Is Running Out To Speak Freely About Free Speech In America.  Donald Trump's rise, his successful use of social media, and new media's refusal to join the crusade against Trump caused a fatal case of Stockholm Syndrome, with Big Tech and legacy media outlets welcoming government requests for censorship.  With support from both for-profit and nonprofit organizations and academic institutions, a Censorship Complex emerged, embracing the government's definition of "truth" and seeking to silence any who challenged it, whether it be new media or individual Americans — even experts.  The search for truth suffered as a result, and Americans were deprived of valuable information necessary for self-governance.  We know this because notwithstanding the massive efforts to silence speech, a ragtag group of muckrakers persisted and exposed several official dictates as lies: The Hunter Biden laptop was not Russian disinformation, Covid very well may have escaped from a Wuhan lab, and Trump did not collude with Putin.  But if the Censorship Complex succeeds and silences the few journalists and outlets still willing to challenge the government, Americans will no longer have the means to learn the truth.

Democrat Plans [are] Looking Bad, So Biden Pivots Again.  The left knows that the only way it can achieve its long-term goals is if the populace is not paying attention.  If the American people, or a large portion of them, at least, are spending all day on TikTok or Twitter or Facebook arguing about often petty and ridiculous ideas and fads, or, for the ones actually paying attention, are talking about irrelevant issues, the left knows that no one will notice when the left is doing something that will change the course of society for generations, in the most negative ways imaginable, or feverishly covering up the massive failures of their own ideology and policies.  These distractions are not something, at this juncture, that any rational American can afford to pay attention to.  The left is launching an all-out assault on society and the culture, a battlefield maneuver that has failed time and again in the past and resulted in countless deaths around the world.  You cannot afford to be distracted by the media.

Wonder why most of the media aren't trusted?  It is no wonder we have so much political corruption when the media are so biased.  They will create fictional stories to go after Republicans while burying true stories about Democrats.  It is absolutely pathetic!  And not once have they asked for scientific data to justify the destruction of companies that produce reasonably priced energy... because they don't care.  We have an absolutely corrupt and incompetent man as president who is actively destroying America with radical, extreme policies and massive taxpayer money to political supporters, and most of the media cheer about how great his policies are.

Save it for the jury.
Sacramento Bee Apologizes for Saying Charlie Kirk Called to 'Lynch' Transgenders.  The Sacramento Bee, a Northern California-based newspaper, has apologized for falsely claiming that Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk called to "lynch" transgenders.  Charlie Kirk had been scheduled to speak at the University of California Davis on Tuesday when Sacramento Bee opinion writer Hannah Holzer called the activist "another fascist" and said that he wanted to lynch transgender people.

The Democrat-Media Insurrection Myth.  The storyline put together by what passes for our news media is that Trump led an armed insurrection on Jan. 6, 2021 that necessitated a House Committee investigation of what happened that day (actually for the political motive to recommend Trump for an indictment in advance of the 2024 election).  The media's job, including CNN, MSNBC, and most newspapers was to refer confidently to "the Jan. 6 insurrection" as if that were a settled fact already in the history books.  What passes for our news media did not say that some people believe it was an insurrection and others believe it was only a riot by some buffoons and then present the facts and let the peasants decide what they thought about the matter.  No, what passes for our news media needed to state the conclusion of that "investigation" long before it was completed.

They Are Intolerant, Divisive, And Anti-Liberty — Call Them Leftists, Not Liberals.  Democrats have moved so far to the left in recent years that they should no longer be called "liberals," unless the true liberals among them start to stand up to the leftists who have taken over.  The term is misleading, giving the impression that Democrats support individual freedoms and accept people of different viewpoints, when increasingly they do not.  The word "liberal" gives yet more power to those who seek to take more of our liberties.  Right-leaning publications often use the term "liberal" when "leftist" would be better.  On the other hand, left-leaning newspapers such as The Washington Post and The New York Times like to use the word "liberal" to describe their own illiberal political views.  It obfuscates how Democrats and their media allies have become more extreme, supporting censorship, authoritarianism, and racial division:  Twitter staff who denied conservatives their right to free speech and eagerly complied with censorship demands from the federal government were described by the Post as milquetoast "liberal employees."  MSNBC says those pushing the tyranny of wokeness are just naughty-sounding "liberal rascals."

Cable News Is Riddled With War Profiteers.  The problem with cable news is that — outside of perhaps Tucker Carlson, who seems genuinely committed to exposing truths and has paid the price for it in the form of the Majority Leader calling for his censorship from the Senate floor — it's not news.  It's state propaganda, by and for the special interests that have purchased the state.  These special interests include big agriculture, big pharma, and, of course, the private weapons manufacturers that comprise the military-industrial complex.

Trust the Science: White people driving cars are poisoning POC in LA.  When earnest reporters at the LA Times got ahold of the study, they couldn't wait to dissect the possible racism contained within.  Make the scientific argle-bargle accessible to your everyday white drivers (aka "THE BAD GUYS") so they would be educated on their transgressions, feel miserable about themselves, self-flagellate, and change their habits of perpetual vehicular oppression.  [Excerpt omitted for brevity, among other things.]  That lad certainly has all the SJW codewords down.  In another column, a second LA Times type waxes on about his drives, how he tries not to drive, and how guilty he should feel every time he drives.

The actual insurrection in DC went unpunished.  For two years now, we have heard about an insurrection that everyone knows was bogus.  The media deliberately lied in its vain attempt to ruin President Donald John Trump — one in a series of attempts by the real deniers of election results.  Tucker Carlson's revelation that the Capitol Police incited peaceful protesters has been dismissed by a media obsessed with lying.  The key to Pravda — the Soviet version of propaganda — was not to get people to believe it, but to get people to stop following the news.  Judging by television ratings in the 21st century, it is working.  It indoctrinates Americans to believe they are powerless and that resistance is futile.  So the lies continue.

Treason of the Science Journals.  At the government level, pandemic preparedness is as much about protecting critical supply chains as it is about administering medical treatments.  What the COVID-19 pandemic showed is that the flow of information, which may be the single most vital resource in the supply chain, is utterly broken.  In many cases, it was actively undermined by senior public health officials including the former chief medical adviser to the president, Dr. Anthony Fauci.  New emails released in a congressional probe show that Fauci helped direct the publication of "The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2," an influential scientific paper published in Nature Medicine on March 17, 2020, that claimed COVID-19 could not have leaked from a laboratory.  Fauci then cited the paper — in effect quoting himself, since he coordinated the article behind the scenes and was given final approval before it published — as if it was an independent source corroborating his assertions that COVID could only have come from a bat and not from a lab.  "There was a study recently that we can make available to you, where a group of highly qualified evolutionary virologists looked at the sequences there and the sequences in bats as they evolve," Fauci said at a presidential briefing on April 17, 2020, exactly one month after "Proximal Origin" was published.

AP Promotes Unfounded and Non-Evidenced Israeli Claim That Pro Trump Twitter Accounts Are Bots Attacking DeSantis and Haley.  As many major stories have shown in the past few years, the big battle over human control is taking place on social media platforms as they continue to be manipulated by government agencies.  The Twitter Files released have shown just how extensive the government manipulation of information has become.  The U.S. State Dept, Dept of Homeland Security, FBI, CIA, DOJ, Defense Dept, and a host of ancillary networked agencies and public-private partnership all occupy this space.  Essentially, it is a fight for control of the public psyche.  In addition to the Twitter Files, stories averse to the interests of the state (Hunter Biden laptop) and fake stories created in the interest of the state (Trump-Russia) are all manipulated by the network of intelligence agencies, quasi government actors and the social media platforms.  This is not debated any longer.  There is overwhelming evidence of this reality now.

The Death of Expertise.  The "experts" told us that inflation was transitory, that the Green New Deal would lower energy prices, that trillions in new government spending costs nothing in taxes, and that Joe Biden's crippling recession reflects economic strength.  They told us that free speech is dangerous; that disinformation governance boards don't promote government propaganda; and that government agencies' blacklisting of news sites, social media content, and public dissent is something other than unconstitutional censorship.  They told us that border walls don't work, that skyrocketing illegal immigration is imaginary, that drug-traffickers aren't killing record numbers of Americans, that illegal aliens cost American taxpayers nothing, and that concern for border security is racist.  They told us that the deadly retreat from Afghanistan was a humanitarian success; that NATO has a military obligation to defend non-NATO Ukraine; that Russia blew up its own Nord Stream natural gas pipelines under the Baltic Sea; that fighting a lethal proxy war with Russia won't increase the likelihood of nuclear conflagration; and that escalating hostilities with Russia, China, and North Korea won't risk sparking World War III.  The "experts" were wrong again and again, but they held the most fashionable opinions.

CNN and Election Disinformation.  My friend and I sometimes argue about media outlets like CNN and MSNBC.  Why do they spread misinformation?
  A.   Are they grossly uninformed?
  B.   Do they know the truth but tell falsehoods anyway?
  C.   Do they think we are stupid or naïve?
My buddy feels that the media outlets know the truth but lie about it.  To me, it is more complicated.  The nice-looking journalists who read the teleprompters are genuinely ignorant.  On the other hand, the news producers probably know the truth but spread misinformation anyway.  Producers are the ones who select the topics, construct the programs, and hire the special analysts.

The Only Thing Conspiratorial About The Covid Lab-Leak Theory Was Media's Coordinated Dismissal Of It.  This week, Democrat activists posing as journalists were forced to admit a hard truth millions of Americans have known for years: The outbreak of the Covid-19 virus most likely came as the result of a lab leak in China. [...] Conservatives, who had considered evidence of a possible lab leak from the beginning, have seen this routine before and remember well the coordinated squelching of a dissenting origin theory.  We know exactly how these same self-professed truth-seekers went out of their way to accuse anyone who considered the possibility that Covid leaked out of a Chinese lab of promoting a "debunked" "conspiracy theory."  "This question about the Wuhan lab — we know it's been debunked, that this virus was man-made or modified or anything like that," then-MSNBC host Kasie Hunt previously said. "The Wuhan Lab Leak Hypothesis Is A Conspiracy Theory, Not Science," a June 2021 headline from Forbes reads.  Other outlets that attempted to dismiss the theory include NPR, Rolling Stone, Foreign Policy, CNN, NBC, and The New York Times, just to name a few.

Former Reuters science reporter: The media is lying about CO2 and a "climate crisis".  This corruption of news reporting into narrative journalism has been apparent for years to climate-hysteria skeptics.  Until recently, however, that revolution-by-evolution process hadn't become apparent to most of the rest of the populace.  Now, however, with all sorts of new data coming out about masks and natural immunity in the COVID pandemic, many more people have seen The Science exposed as based entirely on political agenda.  The mainstream-media refusal to cover new and conclusive meta-analyses of scientific studies that refute their three-year narratives in support of government emergency rule now demonstrates that corruption on a much broader scale.

Habitual liars: Democrats and the media blame Trump for Ohio train carnage.  A disastrous chemical spill occurs in East Palestine, Ohio, and Biden and Mayor Pete don't say a word or visit for weeks.  Shouldn't the media stop pretending that Biden is empathetic?  (Had the event involved a firearm, you know they would have been on site in less than 24 hours to exploit the tragedy as a means to a political end.)  After three weeks, President Trump shows up and the media goes into protection mode, blaming him for the carnage, asserting his "deregulations" were to blame[,] even though his rule-cutting had nothing to do with the cause of the wreck.  Yet, even if Trump's policies were to blame, wouldn't that be all the more reason for Biden and Mayor Pete to go?  I mean, they sure love to blame Trump for everything.  If Trump actually undid crucial safety regulations, shouldn't Biden and Mayor Pete have reinstated the measures?  [A recent] article in Politico shows the deplorable priorities of a significant majority of journalists.  They clearly care more about covering up for Biden's incompetence and inaction than they do about the people suffering from the chemical spill.

America Is Becoming a Corrupt Country.  Hillary Clinton deleted 33,000 emails and had her staff literally take a hammer to destroy a hard drive.  Who are we to question the purity of her intentions?  The FBI has been corrupted at the top and lied about Donald Trump as candidate and president.  The great American newspapers published these lies — and won Pulitzers for it.  Now, it's clear their journalists were either duped or knowingly dishonest.  Yet, they still have the Pulitzers.  Fifty-one intelligence officials signed a dishonest letter just before the 2020 elections discrediting the Hunter Biden laptop and claiming it was probably a Russian hoax.  So what?  This steady drift toward dishonesty and toleration of blatant open hypocrisy is a cancer at the heart of American culture.

Are Helicopters Racist?  I call your attention to [...] the Los Angeles Times, more particularly a story that ran in the paper's Sunday print edition but appeared online Friday evening.  Los Angeles Police Department and County Sheriff's Department helicopters fly lower over black neighborhoods than others, we are told, causing all manner of misery for those living below.  Left unsaid but implicit in the article is that the only possible explanation for this is racism among the people flying the noisy whirlybirds.  The article is truly a shining example of agenda-driven journalism, in which the reporter, Jeong Park, had to ignore every last bit of relevant information regarding both air traffic control and crime in South Los Angeles so as to assign malign intent among the airborne cops and bring this embarrassment to print.  He even linked to an FAA document he apparently believed supported the argument, but which in fact undercuts it.  The piece's many deficiencies have been brought to the attention of several editors at the paper, yet as of this writing it remains online and uncorrected.

Truth in Government.  Whether it is the mainstream media, the social media giants, academia, Hollywood, or corporate America, these institutions lie about everything.  They lie that climate change is a mortal threat to civilization.  It's not.  In fact, there has been zero warming for the last eight years.  Has the media reported that?  They lie that gun violence is out of control.  It is not.  Americans are safer from guns 2023 more so than at any time in our history.  Your chances of being killed by a gun is lower by orders of magnitude less than your chances of getting hit by lightning.  They lie about abortion involving women's health when it is really the murder of children in the womb.  They lie that the nation has secure borders as millions illegally enter our country including terrorists and drug runners.  They lie that the rich pay no taxes despite the U.S. having the most regressive tax regime in the world where our richest citizens pay a disproportionate percentage of the nation's taxes.  They even lie about basic biology, exploiting the sad plight of victims of gender dysphoria.  In recent years there has been a 4000% increase in young females claiming to be the opposite sex.  Is no one in our vaunted institutions — academia or the media — interested in how this could be happening?  They lie about the police being murderous brutes when the truth is that overwhelmingly the police are honest, brave, and fair public servants doing a thankless job to keep our citizenry safe from criminals.  Americans need to demand truth from all our institutions.

Poll: Half Say Media Intend to Mislead, Misinform Public.  Fifty percent of Americans say the national media intend to mislead, misinform, and persuade the public, as just 35 percent say most news organizations could be relied upon, a Gallup and Knight Foundation poll found Tuesday.  While 50 percent say the national media tried to push a false narrative, only 25 percent say the national media do not intend to mislead, misinform, or persuade the public.  Twenty-three percent neither agreed nor disagreed.

Canadian Broadcast Corporation: 'Freedom' is a Far-Right Rallying Cry.  I find myself at a loss for words after reading an article from the Canadian Broadcast Corporation (CBC) on how the word "freedom" has become a "far-right" buzzword.  After pondering and deliberating and contemplating and a lot of other synonyms for "thinking" I found in the thesaurus, I eventually decided the best approach to this topic is an honest one.  This is the craziest, crazy-pants article from Crazytown I've ever read. [...] The premise?  The word "freedom" has become a dangerous "rallying cry" for right wingers in the Great White North, and, presumably, beyond.

Panel that awarded Pulitzers for Russiagate stories mum after scathing exposé on reporting failures.  The panel that awarded Pulitzer Prizes to the New York Times and Washington Post for reporting related to the discredited Trump-Russia collusion narrative has gone mum as it faces new scrutiny following publication of a four-part series in the Columbia Journalism Review (CJR) documenting the establishment media pillars' lapses from their claimed journalistic standards.  The 19-member Pulitzer Prize board for 2017-2018 was comprised of various journalists, professors and writers, including several current or former staff members of the New York Times or Washington Post.  Just The News reached out to 13 members of the panel to find out if the CJR exposé had prompted second thoughts about the Russiagate prizes.  Neil Brown, president of the Poynter Institute had an auto reply set, saying he was out of the office, while Steve Coll, former dean of Columbia Journalism School, had an auto-reply saying he is on sabbatical.  None of the other board members replied.

It is no wonder the media has lost the trust of the people.  No matter how many false predictions the UN, Biden, Kerry, Gore, and others make about natural resources causing an existential threat of climate change, the media just repeats the false predictions and calls it settled science.  People who tell the truth that the climate has always changed cyclically and naturally are falsely called climate change deniers to shut them up.  These false predictions are greatly harming the poor and middle class, but the subjective and biased media clearly doesn't care.  The media claims they care about laws and corruption, but they campaign for corrupt, career criminals like the Bidens and the Clintons.  The media claims that no one is above the law and the Justice Department is now an independent agency that doesn't care about political affiliation.  That is the biggest lie of all. [...] Journalists who believe it is their job to push a political agenda instead of reporting objectively and factually is a much dangerous threat to our survival as a great country than anyone who challenges elections.

The Supreme Court Is At The Heart Of America's Racial Division.  If you are trying to make sense of how our nation has become so toxic, a good starting point is the Supreme Court's 1964 decision in New York Times v. Sullivan.  That case radically altered existing law so that, for the first time in our history, it was impossible for any "public figure" to bring a successful defamation suit. [...] Since the 1960s, progressives have been using the race card to demonize and defame their ideological opponents.  In that vein, it would be hard to imagine a more classically defamatory article than that penned the other day by Renée Graham, an associate editor of the Boston Globe:  "Ron DeSantis's Fear of American History."  Graham outrageously slanders DeSantis by claiming that racism motivated him.  She compares DeSantis's refusal to allow the wildly ideological African American Studies AP Course to be taught in Florida to the actions of a slave owner who refused to allow his slaves to learn to read.  It is, she says, an act of "white supremacy."  Graham paints DeSantis as an evil and immoral person.  This relieves her of the burden of addressing the substance of the DeSantis Administration's complaints about the College Board course.  It is enough that she labels him a racist and white supremacist.

Straight Talk on the Latest Riots.  Riots broke out in Memphis and are rapidly spreading through the usual urban areas.  The purported rationale is the horrific beating to death in Memphis of Tyre Nichols captured on video and released by the police.  As Glenn Reynolds (Instapundit) observes, Nichols' beating was administered by "Black officers in a majority Black city with a Black police chief."  The officers involved have been criminally charged, but the media to which every Black killed by a cop is just proof that we are still in the Selma, Alabama world of decades ago — another case of some innocent Black person victimized by racist oppressors.  The odious Joy Reid at MSNBC highlighted a guest who blames Nichols' death on "white supremacy" and CNN's Van Jones opined "The police who killed Tyre Nichols were Black.  But they still may have been driven by racism."

Move Over, Jayson Blair: Meet Hamilton 68, the New King of Media Fraud.  Ambitious media frauds Stephen Glass and Jayson Blair crippled the reputations of the New Republic and New York Times, respectively, by slipping years of invented news stories into their pages.  Thanks to the Twitter Files, we can welcome a new member to their infamous club:  Hamilton 68.  If one goes by volume alone, this oft-cited neoliberal think-tank that spawned hundreds of fraudulent headlines and TV news segments may go down as the single greatest case of media fabulism in American history.  Virtually every major news organization in America is implicated, including NBC, CBS, ABC, PBS, CNN, MSNBC, The New York Times and the Washington PostMother Jones alone did at least 14 stories pegged to the group's "research."  Even fact-checking sites like Politifact and Snopes cited Hamilton 68 as a source.

Media outlets keep promoting 'forest defenders' and ignoring that they shot a police officer.  I really believed that once the facts of this story came out it would be over.  There was some room for questioning the story of what happened in the forest south of Atlanta initially.  Police told one story and protesters told another.  According to police, they entered the forest to clear out protesters who are trespassing and preventing construction of an approved project.  They found one man under a tent.  They asked him to come out and instead he fired a gun and hit a Georgia State Trooper in the abdomen.  The trooper was taken to a hospital for emergency surgery.  The protester who fired the shot was killed by police.  The alternative story pushed by protesters and their supporters is that the victim had been unarmed and "murdered" by police.  The trooper who was shot?  They strongly suggested he might have been hit by friendly fire.  Since then the official police version of events has been confirmed by evidence and the protesters' version has fallen apart.

Antagonizing the Scapegoats.  [Scroll down] [I]n view of the press' oft-repeated rush to smear its chosen targets, sinister suspicions suggest themselves.  The maudlin interviewer weepily bearing witness to the moving testimony of Jussie Smollett; the glum commentators endlessly recycling the "fine people" hoax; the monotonous chorus solemnly commemorating the all-but-sacred martyrdom of petty thugs like Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown; the casual assignment of guilt by accusation (to police officers, the Covington school kids, Kyle Rittenhouse) — all this arouses our suspicion.  Even when these obscene abuses of the public trust are exposed, there is no retraction or apology; the brazen liars simply soldier on.  Perhaps no institution is more conspicuous in its utter moral failure than the contemporary American print, broadcast, and online media. [...] Contemporary journalists are, as a general rule, embarrassingly unimpressive, poorly educated, self-promoting hacks having no understanding of (or loyalty to) the American heritage (a phrase from which many would probably recoil as a "racist dog whistle").  Journalists represent the worst the American university system has to offer a society its brainwashed graduates routinely degrade.  Any truth a media activist deems detrimental (like the Twitter files) is buried.  Any lie deemed serviceable — no matter how dubious the source or implausible the claim — is amplified and promoted.  Every cherished falsehood is blared at the public until it's exposed, then the activist simply trumpets the next serviceable lie (e.g. "Russia Collusion," "hands up, don't shoot," and so on).

Media Claims 'Largely Peaceful Protest' in Atlanta, Mayor Quickly Demolishes That.  Saturday night brought rioting by Antifa people attacking police targets in Atlanta.  Now, the night started with a protest against the police, in the memory of one of their comrades, Manuel Teran.  Teran had been shot and killed by the police after he allegedly shot a cop, when police came to clear protesters out of an area they had been occupying where the city is constructing a police training center.  The radicals have had several people, in multiple incidents, arrested for domestic terrorism at the site, including for throwing Molotov cocktails at the police.

Who You Gonna Call (When the Cops Aren't Allowed to Help You)?  [Scroll down] If you need further evidence that the [Los Angeles] Times story is an advocacy piece, read no further than the first person quoted.  It is Patrisse Cullors, a cousin of Anderson and, though it goes unmentioned in the story, a major beneficiary of the BLM real estate windfall.  "There is no reason why law enforcement should be the first responders at traffic stops or accidents," Cullors said.  There are actually many reasons they should, but the reporter apparently wasn't up to the task of challenging Cullors.  Next comes the canard inevitably raised in stories like this.  Activists argue, says the Times, "that communities of color have historically borne the brunt of such enforcement."  Put aside the fact that in Los Angeles, as in every other city, "communities of color" are those where crime is highest.

What Is the NOTAM? Flights Grounded Across U.S. After Major System Outage.  All flights have been grounded and paused across the U.S. early this morning until 9 a.m. EST after the Federal Aviation Administration's NOTAM (notice to air missions) system failed, causing travel chaos across the country.  The FAA asked in a statement for time "to allow the agency to validate the integrity of flight and safety information."  The FAA has said it systems was coming back online but that the NOTAM systems was still being restored.

The Editor says...
A NOTAM is a notice to airmen, not a notice to air missions.

Reluctant correction:
The definition of NOTAM  was apparently changed 12/2/2021 to be more politically correct.

Here's the Problem With Mike Rogers 'Lunging' at Matt Gaetz on the House Floor.  In the midst of the battle over Kevin McCarthy becoming Speaker of the House, Rep. Mike Rogers set newsrooms ablaze by "lunging" at Rep. Matt Gaetz.  At the time, Gaetz and others had just finished securing major concessions from McCarthy, and one ballot later, the deal would finally be sealed.  On the prior ballot, though, Rogers, who is set to chair the Armed Services Committee, was apparently angered by Gaetz voting present and chose to lash out.  Because Gaetz was on the receiving end of the rage, the press largely took Rogers' side, exuding a "serves him right" attitude about the ordeal.  That's not a shock given the press will take the side of essentially anyone who opposes someone they themselves oppose.

2022, Perhaps the Apex Year for an Era of Pretending.  In an era of great pretending, when you speak factual and pain truth, people thirsting will come for the sanity.  Yes, there's only so much hypocritical nuttery that can possibly fit into the social fabric of a nation, and we're full.  I see that dynamic starting to play out now.  Mainstream media are openly mocked everywhere for being the Baghdad Bob's they are.  The MSM credibility and influence essentially destroyed by the Potemkin villages and Eco-chambers they built around themselves.  The congressional J6 committee is yet another example of a proclaimed thermonuclear ICBM missile that ended up delivering a contrasting reality.  The fading whistle & pop akin to a dysfunctional bottle rocket.

Why you can't trust 'the science' about anything anymore.  To those who still care about science as a process that uses honest data to produce replicable results, the last couple of decades has been disheartening when it comes to everything from so-called "Anthropogenic Climate Change," to COVID's origins and treatments, to so-called "transgenderism."  Still, we consoled ourselves that there were certain things so cut-and-dried that they could not yield to politics.  For example, how certain diseases affect men and women differently.  A monkeypox study in The Lancet blows even that faint hope to smithereens.  There is something bizarre about a Lancet article entitled "Human monkeypox virus infection in women and non-binary individuals during the 2022 outbreaks: a global case series."  It had all the earmarks of a reputable study. [...] The fact that it referred to non-binary individuals was a bit concerning, but the casual reader would assume that the article focused on biological women, no matter what they claimed to be.  After all, we've long known that diseases affect men and women differently, including the fact that men and women perceive the onset of a heart attack in very different ways.  That makes sense, given that men and women have different organs, bone structures, and hormones.  The devil, as always, is in the details.  It turns out that almost half of the "women" involved in this study about monkeypox in women... were men.

Keystone Pipeline Allowed to Reopen, Media Continues Lying about Spill.  The Keystone Pipeline runs from Alberta to Houston, almost in a straight line south down "Tornado Alley" in America's midwest, running from North Dakota to Texas.  The overall pipeline is 2,687 miles long, is owned by TC Energy, and carries 860,000 barrels of oil per day through its 30 inch diameter tubes.  The current price of oil per barrel is roughly $80.  So the pipeline is moving roughly $68.8 million worth of oil through its pipeline every day, or $25.1 billion per year.  The pipeline shut down on December 7th after a spill of 14,000 barrels of oil in rural North Kansas.  The Calgary, Canada-based company received permission from the Biden administration on Friday to reopen the pipeline, though it did not give a definitive date when it would restart.

A Life Beyond the State.  According to one estimate, the average American adult, whether on the right or the left, spends almost 12 hours a day watching and listening to media, much of it news and political commentary.  This interaction with media is largely a one-way street.  Viewers are not engaged in active discussion or thought; they are told what to think, even as they are encouraged to "like" and "follow."  With most media, such as the mainstream news channels or morning shows, they are harangued by anchors who raise their voices, lift their eyebrows, and employ all sorts of other gestures and expressions to end the discussion even as they read the "news."  Viewers are made to feel that they are ignorant or immoral if they dare to disagree.  This has certainly been the case from the beginning with reporting on COVID, when liberal media endorsed the Chinese lie that the disease originated in a "wet market" and followed up with a string of justifications for lockdowns and restrictions, including long-term school closures.  As with everything else, liberal media served as the handmaiden of the State.  This dependence on media is deadly for the life of democracy.

The 'Twitter Files' are the final nail in the media's credibility.  The vicious and coordinated attacks by mainstream news figures against independent journalist Matt Taibbi in recent days reinforce an essential point about the American news media: they think we are all drooling idiots.  Their response to Taibbi's release of the Twitter Files, which details the company's calculated suppression of a major news story in the run-up to the 2020 presidential election, underscores this exceedingly low estimation of its audience.  Outlets like MSNBC and the New York Times seem to hope the American public is ignorant of the fact that they got every aspect of the Hunter Biden laptop story wrong from the start.  While real journalists tenaciously reported the facts, such as the New York Post's Miranda Devine , a disinformation machine comprised of Biden campaign officials, intelligence officials, liberal journalists, and Twitter higher-ups (with the omission of former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, who was strangely left out of the loop) acted in brazen coordination to suppress the story.

MSM: Democrats Can't Be Election Deniers.  There's always a double standard for the radical left.  There's always a reason why it's "different" when Democrats say something racist, break the law, or question the results of an election.  Case in point:  Time magazine published an article claiming that Republicans who dub House Minority leader-elect Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) an "election denier" are wrong in doing so.  There's no doubt that Jeffries is an election denier.  We have the receipts.  He is actually one of many Democrats who have called Donald Trump an illegitimate president.  According to Time, the term "election denier" has become associated with Republicans who say the 2020 election was stolen because they "assert without evidence there was fraud in 2020 voting."  But the author says that calling Jeffries an "election denier" is misleading and "conflates different issues."  The real issue, which goes unsaid in the article, is that Jeffries and others in his party who have routinely denied the results of presidential elections won by Republicans are Democrats.  Since 2000, every single presidential election won by a Republican has been called "illegitimate" by Democrats.

Leftist Journo Still Believes Hunter Laptop Is Russian Misinformation and Trump Colluded with Russia.  In 2020, when we first learned about Hunter Biden's "laptop from hell," we all knew it was real.  It wasn't until after the 2020 election was over that the mainstream media slowly but surely started to concede the laptop was genuine, but at least one left-wing journalist still thinks the laptop story is dubious.  David Corn, the D.C. bureau chief of Mother Jones and an MSNBC analyst, apparently still believes that the laptop isn't legit.

The Media Undertakers Must be Getting Exhausted.  Among the stories Twitter actively blocked was that of the salacious Hunter Biden laptop contents.  So shocking was the material on this laptop, so revealing of the perversity of Hunter and the corruption of Joe Biden, that one post-election survey reports that 16% of persons who voted for Biden said they would not have had they known of the contents of this laptop.  One major newspaper, the NY Post, did publish a story about it, and several online posters did as well.  The most detailed, should you care to see for yourself what was on the laptop, is [elsew]here.  The laptop reveals not only sexual depravity and illegal drug use, but corruption and influence buying as well.  Taibbi reports "Twitter took extraordinary steps to suppress the story, removing links and posting warnings that it may be 'unsafe'."  The only person it was unsafe for was Joe Biden, the Democrat party's presidential candidate[.]  Even then, White House spokesperson Kayleigh McEnany was locked out of her account for tweeting about it.  Several insiders questioned what was going on and received the untrue defense that the material was removed because it violated the company's "hacked materials" policy.  The laptop was never hacked.  It was abandoned by Hunter, then was unlocked while in the possession of the NY Post, and it and its contents are authentic.  At any other time in history of which I am aware such a scandal would have been front-page news in the weeks preceding an election.

Vicious dogma.  The COVID pandemic is just a flash in the pan when compared to the dogmatic hysteria surrounding most aspects of weather and climate.  When CBS News periodically covered the enormous blanket of snow that recently fell on Buffalo, NY and environs, they would then immediately jump to coverage of the world climate conference (COP 27) at the Egyptian resort of Sharm el-Sheikh.  The abrupt juxtaposition caused me to burst out laughing.  Never once was it mentioned that the historically significant northeast blizzard happened a month before the beginning of winter, i.e., the middle of autumn.  Just about every news story regarding floods, wildland fires, drops in lake and river levels, high tides, etc. winds up including "climate change" as a significant component.  In this year's political season, even candidates for city council included climate activism in their proposed agendas.  Imagine, local political hacks saving their constituents from the weather.

McCarthy: Twitter Disclosures Show Biden Doesn't Want Free Speech, I Wonder What Facebook, Google Are Hiding.  On Friday's broadcast of the Fox News Channel's "Jesse Watters Primetime," House Minority Leader Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) reacted to disclosures on Twitter's suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story by saying he thinks the disclosures are just the tip of the iceberg, he wonders what internal machinations at Facebook and Google have been hidden, and the disclosures show "why the White House is going after Elon.  They do not want him to tell the truth and they do not want to have free speech."

FTX scammer gets kid gloves treatment by the media.  Sam Bankman-Fried, who often goes by SBF, has been doing a media tour to rehabilitate his reputation after scamming his customers out of billions of dollars.  It's actually going very well indeed for him.  Unsurprisingly so, since his victims were average folks and he spread his ill-gotten gains around to the media and the Democrat politicians. [...] It really has been remarkable how easily SBF has been treated.  His scam wasn't penny ante — it was large enough to rank among the largest ever pulled off.  In less than 3 years he managed to build an empire, acquire the naming rights to the Miami Heat stadium, partner with Mercedes Benz, advertise his wares with some of the biggest stars in the world, become the 2nd-largest donor to the Democrats after George Soros, and be lionized by the media as a savior figure.

IRS Watchdog Destroys Media Claim That Trump Ordered Audits of James Comey and Andrew McCabe.  Liberal media outlets like the New York Times and MSNBC claimed former President Donald Trump ordered audits of former FBI chiefs James Comey and Andrew McCabe for political payback.  According to the Internal Revenue Service's internal watchdog, that's not true.  The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration determined that the IRS randomly selected Comey and McCabe for audits of their tax returns from 2017 and 2019 as part of a program the IRS uses to refine its technology, according to a report released Thursday.  The watchdog found no evidence of malfeasance on the part of Trump or any Trump-appointed officials.

Google Gives Millions To Boost Leftist Disinformation Peddlers Of Legacy Media.  Google and its subsidiary YouTube just gave a $13.2 million grant to the Poynter Institute's International Fact-Checking Network to combat "misinformation," in the Big Tech sites' "single largest grant in fact-checking" yet and the latest instance of the medical, political, and media establishments tightening their grip on the free-flowing digital public square.  For years, the world's elites have been trying to recapture the control they lost to the free flow of information on the internet.  They've shelled out millions for celebrities like Prince Harry to slander the First Amendment and hand-wring about an alleged "disinformation" crisis.  They've pressured individual tech companies to ban content, people, and entire platforms.  The Biden administration even tried implementing its own, now-defunct "Ministry of Truth," all to convince us that freedom of speech and inquiry is somehow dangerous and that the threat can only be neutralized by "trusted" experts seizing dominance of the information exchange.

Now the Truth Can Be Told.  In focusing on America's rising rates of violent crime leading up to the midterm elections, Republicans were routinely accused of playing a dirty trick on voters.  "We don't really have a common definition of what crime means," crime-statistics analyst Jeff Asher asserted in an October interview with NPR.  Apparently, the range of activities that constituted a violation of statute made it difficult to discern what voters meant when they said "crime."  And when "crime" wasn't a nebulous concept that eluded the unsophisticated, it was cast as a problem presided over by Republicans.

Our Lying Idiot Media Really Is That Dumb.  It's not just that the media lies all the time in the service of its cause, but that its wretches no longer have the skill or even understanding to tell the lies apart from the truth.  And so they simplify matters in the timeless fashion of extremists by declaring everything they believe to be the truth and everything that they disagree with to be a lie.  Or disinformation.  Faced with Hunter Biden's laptop, they phone up a few experts from their contact list who tell them what they want to hear and the media proclaims it's Russian disinformation.  Faced with actual Russian disinformation accusing Trump of frolicking with prostitutes in Moscow, they cheerfully amplify it as loudly as they can.  And they are too dumb to even know any better.  Like their old Pravda predecessors in Moscow, they don't know anything except the party line.

NPR says bombs in Israel are "rare." They aren't, but the truth doesn't serve their narrative.  These are not "rare" events.  There are an average of more than one pipe bomb every day this year.  If NPR was doing its job, it would have known this information and reported on it way before deadly bombs exploded in Jerusalem.  And it is pretty obvious that the "rare" statement was meant to downplay Palestinian terror, and to avoid mentioning that this has been the bloodiest year for Israelis since 2015, and second deadliest since 2009.

FTX now right-wing according to Forbes.  I kid you not.  FTX — the crypto-fraud firm that just collapsed — is the brainchild of Sam Bankman-Fried, the second largest Democrat donor in the country.  He helped find Joe Biden's campaign, contributing more than any other than our old friend George Soros.  He spent $40 million on Democrats, and promised them $1 billion to help win the 2024 presidential campaign. [...] What is hilarious about this — actually there are many things hilarious about this — is that FTX is actually a darling of Forbes Magazine, who helped it vault to the top of the crypto world.  Forbes hyped the company, hyped Sam Bankman-Fried as a genius, and along with the New York Times turned SBF into a hero, genius inventor.  To the extent that Caroline the fraud was enabled, Forbes, Fortune Magazine, and the New York Times were the chief enablers.

Yesterday's conspiracy theories are today's legacy media news reports.  [Thread reader] NBC Bay Area reporter @BigadShaban reported on the Pelosi attack based on source who saw body cam footage.  It was almost identical to what Miguel Almaguer said 11/4 that got him suspended.  DA says Pelosi will "need to explain... why he did what he did" [...] WashPost reports after all that "secret docs!" drama, Trump raid produced basically nothing of interest. [...] NBC reports the January 6 committee will ignore "law enforcement failures" in final report, instead making it all about Trump. [...] NYT reports the #2 man in the Oath Keepers, Greg McWhirter, was actually an FBI informant, talking to them for months ahead of the Capitol attack.  Oh the day he was supposed to testify in the Rhodes trial, McWhirter, 40, had a heart attack & couldn't. [...] If you said any of this — about January 6 and the FBI, Paul Pelosi, the Trump raid, SBF's virtue signaling — you would have been accused of being a conspiracy theorist.  And now, in the post-midterms news cycle... they are all just true.  Period.

Progressive 'Journalists' Claim Georgia Is Limiting Voting to Celebrate Robert E. Lee.  [Scroll down] In fact, Stacey Abrams, the Voting Rights Maven™, voted for the law about which these people are complaining.  As of this writing, none of the aforementioned media activists have bothered to correct their original tweets with the correct information.  Why not?  Because they are not journalists, they are activists.  Their aim is to influence, not inform.  Sure, we expect authentic reporters to make mistakes from time to time.  But one of the signs that an individual in the media is trying to practice journalism is how they respond when they mess up.  In this case, these folks didn't correct their error because the reality is that none of them care about the truth.  Their audience believes Georgia is stopping voting in order to honor a Confederate general, and that is just fine with them.  No wonder trust in the media is at an all-time low.

We Need To Talk About What Didn't Happen On Election Day.  A number of noteworthy things did not happen on Election Day 2022.  Everyone knows the red wave didn't happen.  But that isn't all that didn't happen.  The chaos at the polls that was going to be caused by the presence of citizen poll watchers did not happen.  Despite being hysterically predicted (hoped for?) over the past 18 months by reporters who wrote the same story with some version of the same headline [...] Every story breathlessly claimed that having citizen observers engaged in the election process was a "threat to democracy," with NBC News warning in early November, "Election officials are bracing for conspiracy-fueled threats — while still hoping for the best..."  The Biden administration did its part to sow seeds of dissension by launching in June 2021 a national hotline at the FBI for reporting "threats to election officials and workers," creating a task force to address "threats against election workers."  But nary a word from Attorney General Merrick Garland about protecting poll watchers, even though federal law makes it a crime to injure, intimidate, or interfere with poll watchers.  Every training conducted by those of us doing such training included instruction about behavior, and that they must be "Peaceful.  Lawful.  Honest."  Yet, without evidence, the closer we got to Election Day, the more hysterical the headlines became, warning of violence at the polls resulting from too many observers watching the process.

Voter Suppression: ABC, CBS Cast Doubt on Midterms, Blaming Violent Right-Wingers.  On Monday morning ahead of Tuesday's almost certain Republican tsunami at the ballot box, ABC's Good Morning America and CBS Mornings moved away from a fixation on abortion or vague warnings about the fate of democracy if voters choose incorrectly.  Instead, they engaged in voter suppression by hinting a vote for Republicans could be enabling violent individuals who'd cause violence and/or cause serious doubts to be raised about our country's future.

Six Reasons Corporate Media Failed to Frame MAGA for Paul Pelosi Incident.  [#5]  The media are trying to frame us for a crime they support — the physical assault of politicians.  [Numerous tweets]  Do the corporate media honestly believe we have forgotten how they laughed and made jokes about a Democrat assaulting Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY)?  Do the media honestly believe we have forgotten how after Rep. Steve Scalise was shot by a Democrat assassin, they dropped the story after 18 hours?  Do the media believe we have forgotten how they blamed Trump for the leftists who caused violence at his rallies or how they ignored the firebombing of countless pregnancy centers, the SWAT-ing of Republican politicians, and told us Antifa attacks on state capitols were mostly peaceful?  And do the media honestly believe we have forgotten how after the terrorists in Black Lives Matter and Antifa wounded up to 50(!) Secret Service agents during a 2020 attack on the White House, the corporate media ridiculed Trump over reports of him being rushed to a secure location?

Could [Democrat] Politics Be Even More Childish?  Within the press, the demise of our political system is a talking point that must be repeated.  Jane Pauley, a longtime media operative for the Democratic Party, has tried to convince voters "the very future of our democracy" is in the balance in next week's elections.  Former Washington Post columnist Margaret Sullivan wrote last spring that "democracy is at stake" because the Republicans will lead a coup in 2024 to ensure the GOP presidential nominee is declared the winner of that election.  More recently, MSNBC political analyst and one-time New York Times columnist Anand Giridharadas put the left's madness on full display.  He has decided that the midterms are "a contest between part of the country that believes in continued and expanded liberal democracy, effort to pursue a more perfect union, and a part of the country that is now attracted to the idea of fascism in the United States."  And of course the New York Times can't help itself.  It's screaming that "many voters" are "frustrated and resigned" because they have "fears" over the "fate of democracy."  If they do, it's because the media, in their constant campaigning for Democrats, have unleashed the torrent of lies.

Left-Wing Media Insists the Parrot Isn't Dead.  It's Just Resting.  In a couple of weeks, John Fetterman will be back home in Braddock, Penn., in his loft apartment, playing with his kids and continuing to recover from what we now know was a devastating stroke.  It's what he should have been doing since he suffered the stroke in May.  But because he and his campaign hid the severity of his condition from the media, his party, and especially his opponent, Mehmet Oz, it came as a shock to see the 49-year-old giant of a man in such a confused state.  Whether it was due to hubris or simple denial of reality, Fetterman's vulnerabilities were exposed for all to see.  That is, everyone but a certain segment of the left-wing media that is working very hard to tell us that we didn't see what we actually saw, that Fetterman didn't do that badly.

Seven Times the Media Lied about 'Disinformation' that was True.  Just about every time the mainstream media tells you that something is "disinformation," it turns out that it's the media that is pushing the lies.  Last week, Just the News put together a list of seven important times that the media told everyone something was "disinformation," but that later turned out to be true.  The list includes:
  •   Hunter Biden's Laptop
  •   The origins of COVID-19
  •   COVID-19 vaccines
  •   Pelosi's Jan. 6 role and calling in the National Guard
  •   The mistreatment of Jan. 6 defendants
  •   Irregularities in the 2020 election
  •   Critical race theory in schools

UPI hiding the decline in order to promote climate change agenda.  Last week, I ran across a UPI story that left me scratching my head.  Titled "In a surprise, global greenhouse gas emissions seem to be on the decline" by Daniel J. Graeber, it's purportedly evidence that there's good news on the climate change front.  The Joe Biden Inflation Reduction Act has caused a bunch of people to buy electric cars, and that, along with wind farms and increased solar capacity, shows we may have turned the corner on climate change, according to data.  Except here's the problem.  The data suggests no such thing.

The Mainstream Media Lied to Me About Conservatives.  Looking back, when I was a Democrat, I never personally knew any Republicans or conservatives yet my entire perception of what they stood for was based on left-leaning media filtering.  I felt that I was being informed when I was being highly misinformed about what an entire political spectrum generally believes and advocates for.  Even more so, as a black man, I bought into the bad-faith political position that "all Republicans & conservatives are racist".

Democrats Whistle Past the Graveyard.  November is almost upon us, and the consensus among credible election analysts is that any momentum the Democrats enjoyed this summer has evaporated.  Despite implausible claims about the ephemeral "Dobbs effect," the election was always destined to be about inflation, crime, immigration, and President Joe Biden's job performance — all issues that favor Republicans.  Yet the Democrats and the corporate media continue to engage in magical thinking about the midterms.  Their latest fantasy involves an all-but-extinct creature known as the "split-ticket voter."  After telling us for years that political polarization has rendered such voters very rare, publications such as the Washington Post have suddenly decided that they could be pivotal this year in several key battleground states.  Oddly enough, a number of corporate media outlets have simultaneously come to the same conclusion.

Using a "fact check" to deceive.  "Fact checks" are almost always intended to deceive or distract you.  During the Trump Administration, every "fact checker" in America needed you to know that every bit of hyperbole Donald Trump spewed out was a "lie," not an intentional exaggeration for effect and that the Babylon Bee was not a credible news source.  Fact checks, in other words, are about spinning you.  Misleading you.  Burning up straw men and then declaring victory.

Leftist Newspaper Lies about First-Trimester Abortion.  The leftist publication The Guardian published images of gestational tissue from the first nine weeks of pregnancy and misleadingly called it an embryo.  An article titled "What a pregnancy actually looks like before 10 weeks — in pictures," featured eight photos of the gestational sac, implying that it was an embryo, even though the embryo was removed during the abortion.  "Each of the images in the article shows a gestational sac but clearly the embryonic and fetal human beings have been removed from the images," OB-GYN Christina Francis told the Daily Caller.

Democrats take 'fake news' to new lows.  Democrats are expanding their misinformation campaign, devising new avenues to promote a false narrative.  In a stunning revelation, The Washington Examiner reported that over the course of the last year, Democrats have launched fake "local media outlets" to swing elections in favor of their candidates. [...] They've stooped to literal fake news outlets to promote themselves, which some might consider election interference, all while they lecture the public about the threat of Republicans and continue with the January 6 theatrical performance.  WaPo — which seeks to elect Democrats and push the leftist agenda everyday — complains about newspapers who push a partisan agenda.  They hilariously act like they are unbiased.  Yet, the WaPo and the NYT both won Pulitzers for peddling lies about Russia collusion for years.  How many times does the media have to see the absolute corruption and partisanship of the FBI as they target Trump and other Republicans with fictional crimes, while protecting criminals like Hillary and Biden, before they tell the public the truth instead of pretending that they are apolitical and that no one is above the law?

Huge percentage of Americans have 'no trust' in newspapers, TV, radio.  According to Gallup, nearly 4 in 10 Americans (38%) have "no trust" in America's media, including newspapers, TV and radio.  The political divide is stark.  Only 14% of Republicans and 27% of independents trust the media, but 70% of Democrats, whose agenda largely has been adopted by reporters and publishers, trust the media.  Overall, 34% of respondents trust the mass media to report the news "fully, accurately and fairly."  But "Just 7% of Americans have 'a great deal' of trust and confidence in the media, and 27% have 'a fair amount,'" the poll said.  At the other end of the scale, 28% say they do not have very much confidence and 38% say they have "none at all."

Reuters "fact check:"  We never said the vaccines would prevent anything.  There has been a considerable amount of understandable buzz and unrest making the rounds since a Pfizer executive was forced to admit to a European Union conference that they never tested their COVID vaccine to see if it would actually prevent infections or halt the transmission of the virus prior to it being rushed onto the market and mandated almost universally.  This has left many health officials and elected officials with pie on their faces and vocal sectors of the public demanding answers.  Stepping into the breach to quell the uproar this weekend is Reuters, publishing yet another one of their infamous "fact checks" to clear the matter up.

Hours Before Decrying 'Horrifying Images,' Mayorkas Was Told CBP Agents Did Not Whip Haitian Migrants.  You may recall an incident last year in which Leftists from Biden, all the way down to your neighbor with the "In This House We Believe" sign became absolutely apoplectic over the cruel and sadistic border agents riding down Haitian immigrants and whipping them.  Whipping them, I say!  Comparisons were even made to antebellum slavery as the Left worked itself into a full-on foaming-at-the-mouth rage.  Except, of course, that wasn't the case.  The agents were using the reins to control the horses and no immigrants were harmed.  There even were pictures of immigrant children petting the horses.  The truth eventually came out and of course was largely ignored by the media, Democrat politicians, and your neighbor.  But as it turned out, the government knew that the allegations were false, but decided to let the narrative take its course.

Ukraine and the Malevolent Legacy of the Obama-Biden Administration.  During the current Ukrainian war, the media has created a mythology that the Left was tough on Vladimir Putin's Russia.  And thus, now it simply continues its hard-nosed efforts in Ukraine.  But nothing could be further from the truth. [...] Indeed, many of America's current difficulties in Ukraine originate from the Obama-Biden Administration's former disastrous policies toward Russia birthed between 2009 [and] 2016.

Democrats Run 50+ 'Local' News Sites in Swing States to Spread 'Fact-Based' Propaganda.  Democrats are reportedly running dozens of "quasi-local" news sites across multiple swing states, producing pro-Democrat and anti-Republican content under a veneer of non-partisanship.  At least 51 of these "local" news sites across 10 swing states are being run by Local Report Inc., founded last year in Florida, Axios reported.  Six writers from "progressive" Washington-based The American Independent have also contributed to most or even all of the websites, according to Axios.  Many of their articles appear exclusively on the news sites, although the sites aggregate content from other sources as well.

Dem Operatives Behind Network Of Fake News Pop-Up Sites In Battleground States: Report.  Democratic operatives are flooding battleground states with more than 50 supposedly local media outlets that are really designed to promote liberal candidates, according to a bombshell investigation by Axios.  One man linked to the scheme is David Brock, the one-time conservative journalist who did a 180-degree turn and founded Media Matters For America, the controversial nonprofit that attacks conservative news sites.  Axios' investigative reporters Lachlan Markay and Thomas Wheatley say the operation uses a "patina of independent local news content designed to put a sheen of original reporting on partisan messaging."  The 51 pop-up sites have names such as the Milwaukee Metro Times, Macomb Digest, Mecklenburg Herald, and the Tri-City Record, and are aimed at key swing states Arizona, Colorado, Georgia, Michigan, New Hampshire, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Wisconsin, according to the report.

Democrats are operating a series of 51 'fake news' websites pushing left-wing stories in toss-up states.  A liberal political media operation being run out of Washington, D.C., and Florida is pushing left-wing stories in 51 different fake news outlets in order to influence the outcome of the November midterm elections, it is claimed.  The allegations came in a shocking new investigation from Axios that was published on Thursday.  The report alleges that in the past 12 months, multiple new 'news' website have appeared across the country, all run by a company named Local Report Inc.  They do report a wide variety of stories — but sprinkled throughout are news items pushing Democrat lawmakers and policies.

Media Falsely Links Hurricanes to Climate Change.  Here Are the Facts.  As Florida deals with the cleanup from Hurricane Ian — which ravaged the state, killed hundreds, and displaced thousands more — media outlets have peddled the idea that this tragedy is the result of climate change.  Some even suggested that Florida shouldn't get aid because some of its elected officials oppose federal legislation that would pump billions of dollars into various green initiatives.  The New York Times ran a piece headlined "Florida Leaders Rejected Major Climate Laws.  Now They're Seeking Storm Aid."  The subheadline read, "Senior Republican politicians in the state have opposed federal action against global warming, which is making storms like Hurricane Ian more destructive."  The Times report said that while Republicans in the state are requesting aid, they "don't want to discuss the underlying problem that is making hurricanes more powerful and destructive."  What was the cause, according to the Times?  "The burning of fossil fuels."  Of course.

Do Republicans Cause Hurricanes?  With the grim inevitability of Greek tragedy, three things always happen when a hurricane makes landfall in the United States.  First, the storm will be touted by the corporate media as evidence that anthropogenic climate change presents an existential threat to humanity and the planet.  Second, anyone who dares question the accuracy of this claim will be either ignored or denounced as a dangerous anti-science "denier."  Third, if the hurricane happens to hit a state with a GOP governor, he will be blamed for causing any resultant death and destruction.  In the case of Hurricane Ian, all three commenced more than 24 hours before the storm actually arrived in Florida.

The Media's Coverage of Hurricane Ian Proves They Think You're Stupid.  Democrats want to convince you that they can somehow control the weather and that all we need to do to prevent natural disasters is give them power.  That's either unmitigated hubris coming from Democrats or malicious lies.  Maybe both?  [Video clip]

'Absolutely Fake News': Even Liberal Former PM Dismisses 'Fascism' Brewing in Italy Claims.  Former liberal Prime Minister of Italy Matteo Renzi has dismissed alarmist claims in the global media that incoming Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni is a "danger to democracy", telling CNN "the idea that now there is a risk of fascism in Italy is absolutely fake news."  "Personally, I was against Giorgia Meloni.  I'm not her best friend.  We grew up together in politics, but we are, and will be, rivals, always," said Renzi, who served as Prime Minister of Italy for nearly three years until December 2016, and is the leader of the liberal "Italia Viva" party.  "At the same time, I think [Meloni] is not a danger [to] Italian democracy," Renzi continued.  "She is my rival, and we will continue to fight each other, but the idea that now there is a risk of fascism in Italy is absolutely fake news."

Gavin Newsom's laughable gripe about conservative media bias.  You have to admire the chutzpah of California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who ludicrously claimed last weekend that Democrats were at a disadvantage because conservative media controls the story.  Really!  "These guys are ruthless on the other side.  Ruthless on the other side," Newsom said. "That prime-time lineup by Fox, they are ruthless.  They dominate the most important thing in American politics today, and that's the narrative.  Facts become secondary to narrative.  They dominate with illusion.  We are getting crushed."  It's the ultimate in projection.  On story after story, the media follow Democratic talking points to the letter.  Asking for young children not to be taught about sex becomes "Don't say gay."  Crime-ridden Democratic cities?  They're not that bad, the press says.  As Post columnist Michael Goodwin pointed out on Sunday, nowhere is this more true than with immigration.  The media have ignored or minimized the flood of illegal migrants, and ask no hard questions on President Biden's open-border policies.

Media midterm games at border.  If you're trying to understand why Democrats are making a comeback in polls despite President Biden's many failures, look no further than the political firestorm over the crisis at the southern border.  The battle offers a case study of how the media shapes public opinion by magnifying left-wing talking points, ignoring key facts and distorting conservative criticism.

It's Time to Stop the Left's 'Fact Check' Scheme.  [Scroll down] Both examples above are how the modern "fact-checking" regime works.  They don't like your opinion, so they add "context" that wasn't there in the first place, then disprove the context they added, knowing you will be flagged and possibly suspended from social media.  It seems impossible, but this is how modern-day fascism has crept into our society.  When considering where we have landed as a society, I always think of the book-burning scene in Indiana Jones.  In the scene, Nazi soldiers are throwing every book they disagree with on a massive fire and celebrating the destruction of opposing opinions.  Modern-day book burning doesn't look as dirty.  In my case, two young female "journalists" named Mariah and Kyley attempted to eliminate my opinion from society, most likely while sipping on a $7 latte in a trendy coffee shop in Brooklyn.

Miami Herald Warns That Christian Rhetoric Could 'Mobilize Fringe Mobs'.  The Miami Herald has discovered something about Republican politicians, and boy, is it a problem.  You may want to sit down for this one.  GOP politicians who are Christians use scripture in their speeches. [...] I know.  You're not really shocked or appalled, but this information came as news to the Miami Herald's Ana Ceballos, particularly when it comes to Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-Fla.), who Ceballos' article says is "playing with fire."  The reporter goes all the way back to February to cite a speech DeSantis made at Hillsdale College to make her point.

The Political Party That's Built On Lies.  The Democrats' tower of lies has been constructed with the help of the media, which outside of a few exceptions, are no longer objective, or even pretend to be, and are instead propagandists for the party they are loyal to.  In just the last six years the media have perpetuated the stolen-by-Russia 2016 presidential election lie, the Stacey Abrams I'm-the-real-governor-of-Georgia lie, and the lie that the incriminating information on Hunter Biden's laptop was Russian disinformation.  The press also lies about policies, casting Democrats' ideas in the best light possible, the Republicans' policies in the worst.  A recent and especially egregious example:  Both the Democrats and the media have been calling Florida's Parental Rights in Education law the Don't Say Gay Bill, a gross and intentional mischaracterization intended to vilify and poison.  Rather than promote freedom and prosperity, Democrats' policies enslave and impoverish middle and lower America while at the same time prop up the leftist ruling class and its cronies.  But no one would know this by listening to the media and their handlers in the party.

Zuckerberg's Admission Of FBI Meddling In 2020 Election Is Even Bigger Than It Seems.  Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg's admission last week that the FBI pushed the social media giant to censor Russian misinformation — and thus the Hunter Biden laptop story, as that's how the agency and Democrats characterized it — shortly before the November 2020 election is but a breadcrumb of a bigger scandal: the widespread interference by the FBI in the 2020 presidential election with the potential that the bureau coordinated its efforts with the Biden campaign.  When asked during a Thursday podcast with Joe Rogan how Facebook handles controversial news, such as the Hunter Biden laptop story, Zuckerberg stopped his host to provide a backdrop to Facebook's decision to decrease distribution of the scandal.

FBI Reportedly Said to 'Routinely' Work with Social Media Companies to Censor 'Threat Info'.  Collusion between government and Big Tech goes deeper than Joe Biden's incompetence.  The FBI reportedly responded to the revelation it pressured Facebook to censor during the 2020 election by saying that the agency "routinely" works with social media companies to target "potential threat information."  The FBI "cannot ask, or direct, companies to take action on information received," but does coordinate with "social media providers" to moderate content, according to an Aug. 26 FBI statement reported by Reclaim The Net.  This revelation comes after multiple efforts by various arms of the Biden administration to increase censorship leading up to the 2022 midterms.  The FBI claimed, according to Reclaim The Net, it "routinely notifies U.S. private sector entities, including social media providers, of potential threat information, so that they can decide how to better defend against threats."  How many companies is the federal government working with to censor free speech?

The Economic News Is All Bad, And The American Public Knows It.  Reporters and analysts are getting used to describing news about the U.S. economy as "mixed."  The public, however, knows it's all bad, because the results of President Joe Biden's economic and energy policies are hitting Americans right in their pocketbooks.  The latest ostensibly good news was Thursday's Bureau of Economic Analysis report that the second quarter decline in U.S. gross domestic product was a little less than previously stated: -0.6% instead of -0.9%.  That's good only if your definition of success is slightly slower failure.  The reality is that the U.S. economy is in serious decline and getting worse.

LA Times columnist blames Trump for crime in California.  It's hardly a secret that the crime rates in California are out of control.  We've been talking about this tragic fact here until we're blue in the face.  The critical question that everyone needs to be asking is "why." How did things get so far out of control?  Los Angeles Times columnist Anita Chabria gamely took a stab at the question on Friday.  She first listed the correct collection of suspects sharing the blame, including permissive, soft-on-crime laws and the permissive, soft-on-crime officials who enact and enforce those laws.  But she then sweeps those answers away and reveals the real culprit.  Clearly, the wave of killings and other crimes in the state of California is the fault of the Bad Orange Man.  Yes, folks, the person who has not been in office for more than nineteen months and has never lived in the Golden State must be at fault.

Mark Zuckerberg Admits On Joe Rogan That Facebook Censored The Hunter Laptop Story At The Request Of The FBI.  Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg has revealed that before the New York Post broke the Hunter Biden laptop story, the social media giant received a warning from the FBI which prompted Facebook to limit the story's reach on the platform ahead of the 2020 presidential election.  The billionaire tech mogul said the FBI approached Facebook and warned it "be vigilant" before the New York Post story on the contents in Joe Biden's son's laptop.  [Video clip]

Zuckerberg's Meta going all in in censorship as the midterm election nears.  Meta, the corporate parent of Facebook, has announced its plans to control the flow of information on the site where most voters get their news.  You see, the public has to be protected from "misinformation" and the omniscient sages of Meta are just the folks to decude what is and isn't worthy of being shared with the public. [...] I am so old that I remember when the free flow of information was regarded as key to the democratic process.  But the ruling interests in the United States have decided otherwise, and as long as people default to using Facebook and Twitter for their communications, they will be sheep, herded by the oligarchs.

Trump-deranged media races again to tarnish ex-prez via unnamed sources.  In the wake of the FBI raid on ex-President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago home, The Washington Post and New York Times are running breathless, anonymously sourced stories suggesting "grave" Trump misdeeds.  Have they learned nothing about crying wolf?  "Classified documents relating to nuclear weapons were among the items FBI agents sought" in the raid, the WaPo reported, revealing nothing about the biases of its unnamed sources who have full license to distort or even lie — as similar anonymous sources did for years during the "Russiagate" fiasco.

Media is back to anonymous, one-source stories on Trump that we can't trust anymore.  It feels like old times.  In the wake of the FBI raid on Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago club, the mainstream media are in a feeding frenzy the likes of which we haven't seen since he exited the White House.  The usual suspects, like The New York Times and Washington Post, which spent the four years of Trump's presidency consistently and spectacularly beclowning themselves, are at it again.  Dare we say that it has "all the hallmarks" of media incompetence?  Take The Washington Post:  Using its signature anonymous single-source style, it broke the alleged news that Trump was in possession of documents "related to nuclear weapons."  What exactly does that mean?  Honestly, based on Post's coverage of Russiagate, when so many "bombshells" fizzled when the details emerged, you have to wonder if it's the White House pastry chef's recipe for nuclear chocolate cake.

Stop calling them 'Asian' grooming gangs.  Last week's landmark report into grooming gangs in Telford made for truly horrifying reading.  It revealed that 1,000 mainly white girls had been subjected to horrific sexual abuse by groups of men of mainly Pakistani heritage since at least the 1980s.  Tom Crowther QC, who chaired the Telford inquiry, said that 'the overwhelming theme of the evidence has been the appalling suffering of generations of children caused by the utter cruelty of those who committed child sexual exploitation'. He then went on to say that the failure of the authorities to intervene was in part driven by 'a nervousness that investigating concerns against Asian men, in particular, would inflame racial tensions'.  'Asian' men?  This is an odd description of the perpetrators.  Crowther pulled almost no punches in his summing up.  But this was definitely one he did pull.  The members of the grooming gangs were not simply 'Asian' — by and large, they were Muslim men of Pakistani heritage.

Pulitzer Prize Board Stands by Awards Given to NYT, WaPo for Russia Hoax Reports.  The Pulitzer Prize Board on Monday [7/18/2022] announced it is standing by awards given to the New York Times and Washington Post for their reports on the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax.  "In the last three years, the Pulitzer Board has received inquiries, including from former President Donald Trump, about submissions from The New York Times and The Washington Post on Russian interference in the U.S. election and its connections to the Trump campaign — submissions that jointly won the 2018 National Reporting prize," the organization's statement reads.

That 10-Year-Old Abortion Story the President Ranted About Gets a Major Update.  In the wake of Roe v Wade being overturned, a viral story about a 10-year-old girl in Ohio being raped, impregnated, and unable to obtain an abortion spread like wildfire across the political sphere.  Major news networks covered it as truth despite the fact that it was a single-sourced account from an abortion doctor who provided zero corroborating details.  The story was then used as proof of how harmful Republican abortion bans are to the point that even Joe Biden got in on the act.  The president used the report to rail against pro-life laws, proclaiming "imagine being that little girl" while asserting that Ohio forces raped children to give birth.  Of course, not everyone was so gullible.

Gallup Poll:  Trust In News Outlets Hits a Historic Low.  The American people's trust in news outlets has hit a historic low, according to Gallup's annual survey on confidence in major U.S. institutions.  It's like they've discovered that "straight news" isn't their primary goal.  Both newspapers and television news have seen another drop in confidence over the past year, with each losing an average five percent of people who said they had a "great deal" of trust in such institutions.  Gallup has been measuring "confidence in institutions" since 1973, and annually since 1993.  Television news is now considered the second least-trusted institution in America, after Congress, with just 11 percent of respondents telling Gallup they have "quite a lot" of trust in television news.  Newspapers aren't much better at 16 percent.

This Is What Real Revolution Looks Like.  If you listen to the mainstream media you will know that from time to time spontaneous peaceful protests break out in the nation focused on various social issues.  You will also know that Antifa is largely a fiction of the 'delusional right' and that the real threat to the nation comes from a vast right-wing conspiracy driven by white supremacists.  In short, you will know nothing.

Media Melt Down over Roe v Wade being overturned.  Democrats and the Garbage Media are melting down and doing everything they can to spew lies and misinformation in the immediate aftermath of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v Wade.  We'll start with Chuck Todd, who claims for the first time in his lifetime the Supreme Court has just taken away a 'right':  [Tweet]  Abortion was never a 'right' to begin with!  Our true rights come from God and that is what our Constitution seeks to protect.  It was 49 years ago that the Supreme Court wrongly concluded that abortion was a 'right' guaranteed by the Constitution.  The Supreme Court today didn't take away any 'right' to abortion, they pointed out that the 'right' never existed in the first place.  In fact, as Jan Crawford pointed out on CBS, another way of looking at it is that the right to life was given back to the unborn today, which was taken away 49 years ago:  [Tweet]

USA Today Reporter Resigns After Getting Caught Fabricating 23 Stories.  USA Today removed 23 of its articles from its site after an internal investigation revealed one of its reporters Gabriela Miranda had fabricated sources.  "After receiving an external correction request, USA TODAY audited the reporting work of Gabriela Miranda.  The audit revealed that some individuals quoted were not affiliated with the organizations claimed and appeared to be fabricated.  The existence of other individuals quoted could not be independently verified.  In addition, some stories included quotes that should have been credited to others" USA Today wrote in an editor's note published on its site on Thursday afternoon [6/16/2022].

USA Today removed 23 stories from website, other platforms following audit of reporter's work.  After receiving an external correction request, USA TODAY audited the reporting work of Gabriela Miranda.  The audit revealed that some individuals quoted were not affiliated with the organizations claimed and appeared to be fabricated.  The existence of other individuals quoted could not be independently verified.  In addition, some stories included quotes that should have been credited to others.  As a result, USA TODAY removed 23 articles from its website and other platforms for not meeting our editorial standards.  The headlines of the articles are listed below.  Miranda has resigned as a reporter for USA TODAY and the USA TODAY Network.

Truth is now in plain sight.  Post-injection death tolls have reached levels that are making it very difficult for the powers-that-be to keep the lambs sleeping and the vaxx zealots enthused.  Thus they are resorting to the oldest, tried-and-true tricks in the book, particularly the "if you tell a lie enough, it becomes the truth" method.  Politifact wrote the same, regurgitated article on April 6, 2022, declaring that mRNA and viral vector DNA injections are not the cause of countless sudden deaths in adults and kids.  The Poynter Institute, Politifact's parent organization, wrote nearly the exact same "fact check" article on September 24, 2021.  The effort has been persistent, consistent and coordinated among the monolithic mainstream media since the spring of 2021.  Pfizer-owned Reuters wrote a "fact-check" on April 29, 2021 entitled, "No evidence COVID-19 vaccines will cause an 'exponential rise' in deaths."  The next day, on April 30, 2021, USA Today wrote a "fact-check" entitled, "COVID-19 vaccines don't cause death, won't decimate world's population." FactCheck.org got into the mix on March 2, 2022, with an article entitled, "COVID-19 Vaccines Have Prevented Deaths, Contrary to Misleading Graphic on Social Media."

NYC man nabbed in subway slashings had just been freed after knife dispute with cops.  A Queens man was arrested over the weekend for two random subway slashings in as many days — crimes he allegedly committed after being picked up, then let go, for brandishing a knife at cops.  Donny Ubiera, 32, stabbed two straphangers — one in the face and the other in the neck — without provocation in separate incidents Friday and Saturday morning along the Flushing-to-Midtown No. 7 subway line, the NYPD said in a statement.  The accused serial slasher had just gotten out of jail Thursday — with a single night of "time served" — for allegedly refusing to put down a large knife when confronted by Queens officers on the street and then trying to flee with it the day before.

The Editor says...
The news media consistently uses the term "random" to conceal black-on-white hate crimes.

The dystopian state of our nation.  What to do?  Wake up!  Vote!  Get involved with an election integrity project or a precinct project.  Fight back.  Say no to medical mandates!  Vote out the RINOs like McConnell, Graham, Romney, Cheney, Kinzinger, etc. — all the fake conservatives who just want to be part of the swamp long enough to get very rich without offending anyone else in that swamp.  We know who they are; Trump exposed them all to the sunlight.  Don't believe a word uttered on CNN or MSNBC.  Like the networks, their talking heads get their talking points from the Democrat party, and they never deviate, which is why they sound like mindless mimics.  There is not a critical thinker among them.  They might as well all be Kardashian cut-outs.  They are all Alinskyites now.

A friendly reminder that many gun control groups routinely inflate school shooting numbers.  [Threat reader]  [Scroll down]  Are these all instances of gun violence?  Yes.  Are they all problematic in their own right?  Yes.  But packaging these as part of some "school shooting" epidemic is dishonest nonsense.  [Indeed], they literally count a cop who shot himself in his own vehicle vaguely near an elementary school.  Presumably overnight.  In mid-JULY. We've got a 25-year-old fatally shot [and I quote here] "near a school playground."  On a Sunday evening.  A 17-year-old fatally shot outside of an elementary school... on Veteran's Day, when school wasn't in session.  It doesn't get less absurd.  They include an instance where, after a night game for an adult league flag football league, a man fatally shot a member of the opposing team because of an on-field dispute... solely because it happened behind an elementary school. [...] We've got an instance where a stray bullet struck a window of an elementary school while no one was inside the building.  We've got "a couple shots fired near a middle school baseball field on a Friday evening while a 20 year old and friends were taking batting practice," apparently not directed at anyone associated with the school, and as far as anyone can tell there were no injuries.  There are bullets hitting the outside wall of a middle school gym in the early morning before anyone was on the campus, likely during an unrelated drive-by shooting.

BBC accused of altering alleged rape victim's quote to avoid 'misgendering' transgender male attacker.  The woke BBC is being accused of outrageously altering an alleged rape victim's quotes by replacing pronouns to be more inclusive in an effort to protect her transgender attacker from "misgendering."  The Times of London broke the story that the British media outlet previously quoted a woman who claimed she was raped by a transgender male and then altered her words to be politically correct.  Her quotes were part of a report from 2021 on lesbians who have been "coerced into sex with transgender women."  The story was published on Oct. 26, 2021.  It covered a lesbian campaign called "Get the L Out."  Gay women were candidly asked about their sexual relationships with transgender women.

There were WMDs in Iraq.  Despite evidence to the contrary, there is the continued belief that there were no weapons of mass destruction found in Iraq.  Between the Democrats, the media who serve as their propagandist, and those who have an irrational hatred of George W. Bush, there has been a refusal to give up the lie that nothing was found in Iraq.  One of the reasons given by former President Bush for going into Iraq — beyond Hussein's government funding international terrorist activities that did target Americans — was weapons of mass destruction were in fact found.  In other words, the weapons were not the only reason, but also the financing of international terrorism.  A 'weapon of mass destruction' is not just nuclear, but other weaponry meant to harm a large number of people through unconventional means.

Daily Beast releases apology to Hunter Biden's laptop repairman.  The Daily Beast has issued an apology to the Delaware computer repairman who acquired Hunter Biden's laptop for wrongly claiming in a past story that the computer was "stolen."  The apology to John Paul Mac Isaac appeared in a Wednesday [5/25/2022] editor's note attached to a story the Daily Beast published in Dec. 2020 alleging the laptop was pilfered, Fox News reported.  "An earlier version of this story mistakenly referred to Hunter Biden's laptop as 'stolen.'  We have removed that word, and we apologize to Mr. Mac Isaac for the error," the editor's note reads.  Isaac, 45, was left with the infamous laptop after Hunter Biden abandoned it at his shop in 2019.  The repairman came to legally own the laptop after the president's son neglected to ever pick it up.

Seven Ways The Texas Tribune Is All-In On Climate Fearmongering.  A recent piece in The Texas Tribune lists seven alleged ways climate change is already impacting the state of Texas and its residents.  When not outright false, the listed claims are extremely misleading.  Real-world data indicates the state of Texas faces no severe imminent threat from climate change.  Two writers, María Méndez and Erin Douglas contributed to the article, "Seven ways climate change is already hitting Texans," which runs the gamut of common alarmist lines.  This isn't the first time Erin Douglas and The Texas Tribune have published false information about the impacts of climate change on Texas.

Man shot and killed on NYC subway in broad daylight, cops say.  A deranged gunman shot and killed a 48-year-old straphanger aboard a Manhattan subway train Sunday morning in what cops are calling an unprovoked attack.  The shooter, who was still on the loose Sunday afternoon, paced back and forth in the last car of the northbound Q train around 11:42 a.m. before he opened fire on the random victim seated inside, police and sources said.  "Completely random," one police source said.  The victim, whose name wasn't immediately released, was rushed to Bellevue Hospital where he was later pronounced dead, police said.

The Editor says...
The news media in New York is always very quick to excuse cold-blooded killers as "deranged" and the killings as "totally random" — especially when the shooter is black and the victim is not, which is almost always the case, and apparently was the case this time.  The newspapers' writers dare not suggest that blacks are racist or that they target white people just because they're white; but if the colors were reversed, hate crime accusations would fly.

Signs of a False Flag
 1.  Asks you to respond emotionally rather than intellectually.
 2.  Strips the event of context, such as the contemporary factual setting, geopolitical reality, or historical awareness.
 3.  Demands a rush to judgment before a diligent, independent inquiry occurs.
 4.  Collectivizes judgment, by taking an individual event, and demands you blame an entire culture, religion, race, ancestry, community or country for it.
 5.  The only explicable motive offered for the offending action is irrational evil or utterly stupid immorality, as it is against the rational interest of the offender to commit the act for the reasons alleged.

Congrats To The Media For Finally Finding A White Supremacist.  Assuming the gunman who shot up the Buffalo, New York, grocery store really was motivated by anti-black racism, let's do what the media do when faced with an Islamic terrorist who goes on a killing spree in America and just refer to him as a "lone wolf," a mentally unstable individual who in no way reflects any broader phenomenon or trend.  Except, unlike with violent Muslim extremism, that characterization in this case would be true.  Despite what the media, Democrats, leftists, and, of course, the permanent Washington bureaucracy say (over, and over, and over again), there is no imminent, large-scale threat from white nationalists.  It doesn't exist outside of Joe Biden's TelePrompter.

There was Another Mass Shooting in America.  You Didn't Hear About It Because the Suspect is a Chinese Communist.  [Scroll down]  The Orange County Sheriff's Department tweeted the known facts about the mass shooting on Monday.  "The Laguna Woods church shooting investigation has continued through the night.  Teams continue to process the scene," the sheriff's department said.  "The suspect in the Laguna Woods church shooting has been identified as David Chou, 68 years old, of Las Vegas, NV," the sheriff's department added. [...] Except there is a problem with the narrative:  The suspect isn't a 'white supremacist.'  Nor is he one of the many African-American assailants who have been charged and convicted for attacking Asian-Americans.  The suspect is a Chinese-born man named David Wenwei Chou, a 68-year-old resident of Las Vegas.  His motivation for the mass shooting was described in a hand-written note in Chinese left on a car dashboard, as was reported by the L.A. Times.  "David Wenwei Chou, 68, of Las Vegas, left notes in Chinese in his car stating he did not believe Taiwan should be independent from China, said Orange County Sheriff Don Barnes," the Times reported.

A Tale Of Two Mass Shootings.  In the span of one month, there were two mass shootings.  Both took place in New York.  Both were racially motivated.  Both shooters were violent extremists.  But the media tied only one of them to a mainstream political party.  Can you guess why?  Immediately after the identity of the alleged Buffalo shooter — initially charged with one murder and suspected of killing 10 — became known, the chattering class was insisting that he was not a "lone wolf" and pinned the blame for the massacre on "right-wing extremists" who "control the Republican party."  The Rolling Stone called the 18-year-old Payton Gendron "a mainstream Republican." [...] A Los Angeles Times op-ed declared that "The Buffalo gunman emerged from a far-right ecosystem that's gone mainstream."  New York Times weighed in with an article headlined:  "Replacement Theory, a Fringe Belief Fueled Online, Is Refashioned by G.O.P."

Guess how the Buffalo shooter identified himself politically.  The alleged supermarket killer is self-described as authoritarian left — so why isn't this being reported?  If the alleged Buffalo killer's "manifesto" is authentic, he was deep into communist ideology and now is an authoritarian leftist.  Why is this being kept under wraps?  The teenager accused of murdering ten people last Saturday in Buffalo, N.Y. also allegedly posted a 180-page "manifesto" online that the national media are selectively exploiting, leaving out key facts.

Press pumps up Joe Biden.  "History will be kind to me," Winston Churchill said, "because I intend to write it."  Britain's great statesman did as he promised, but Joe Biden has an even sweeter deal.  He doesn't need to put pen to paper because a cottage industry of so-called journalists is already twisting truth to make the failing president a victim, if not a hero.  It's as if somebody in an old newsroom called out, "Sweetheart, get me rewrite," and a thousand scribes raised their hands to volunteer to make Biden look like something other than the second coming of Jimmy Carter.  History, schmistory.  No need to wait — this is fiction on the fly!  "What Choice Does Biden Have?" The New Yorker magazine asked, before answering:  "With the impending evisceration of Roe v. Wade, partisanship is the only course for a President in our broken system."  See, the "system" is always "broken" when Democrats don't get their way.  Only when they win is America a real democracy.

The last people anyone should trust to tell or determine the truth are journalists and government officials.  There are many examples of where the media colluded with the Democrats to intentionally spread misinformation to the public.  Here is a small sample:  Democrats in Congress have repeatedly challenged elections where they lost yet they weren't called treasonous, weren't said to be against democracy, where we didn't have endless hearings, and they weren't silenced.  Obama, Biden, Pelosi, and others repeatedly lied to the public about Obamacare, but the media not only didn't silence them, but they also supported them.  Obama and Hillary concocted a lie about Benghazi, as Americans were killed, and the media never silenced them.  The Obama administration used the media to spread lies to get support for the Iran deal, yet the media never silenced them.  Most of the media still supports the deal that enriched Iran, which continues to spread terrorism and pledge death to America.  The media and others intentionally spread the lie of "Hands up Don't Shoot" that ginned up racial hate against cops.  How many cops have been killed and injured because of that intentional lie?  Yet, no one who spread the lie has been silenced.  The media, DNC, the Hillary campaign and government employees colluded to spread the lie about Russian collusion to destroy Trump and they have not been silenced.

Media Hoax:  No, Kevin McCarthy Did Not Say Trump Should Resign Over J6.  There they go again.  The left and NeverTrump infotainment propagandists are busily twisting and spinning their claims that then-House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy wanted President Trump to resign after J6.  The implication being that he was so personally mortified by the "insurrection" (that wasn't) that he personally wanted the president to resign as a traitor.  Or something.  However, and completely unsurprisingly, if you listen to the audio they are touting as "evidence," you can clearly tell that he is discussing a particular circumstance:  Democrats and NeverTrump Republicans pursuing removal of Trump from office via the 25th Amendment.

Carter 2.0 — Media Runs Interference for Joe Just Like They Did for Jimmy.  Now that Joe Biden's approval rating has fallen — it's hovering in the low 40s, and it can't get up — the Main Stream Media have come up with a new line of defense for their man.  Okay, goes this new line, Biden isn't doing so well, but that's to be expected — because no president can do well.  That is, the problems are just too tough, the job is just too hard, the country is just too polarized, yada yada yada.  As we shall see, history suggests that the American people won't buy an argument based on hopelessness, which we can call the desperation defense.  After all, Americans tend to be optimistic and solution-oriented.  And so if an elected official can't solve the problem, throw him out and give someone else a chance.  That's the American Way.

Superhero Obama Fights 'Online Lies'?  The New York Times sounded a little giddy on the front page of its "Business" section April 21 with the headline "Obama Joins Fight to Curb Online Lies."  This spin strongly suggests former President Barack Obama never lies.  He's a valiant warrior against lies.  That came after a badly disguised press release at CNN.com on Obama "urgently throwing himself into the fight against disinformation."  As usual, they make it sound like a superhero has landed whenever Obama arrives on the scene.  Never mind PolitiFact giving Obama the "Lie of the Year" in 2013 for when he said, "If you like your health care plan, you can keep it."  Never mind Obama's baldfaced lies in 2012 that the Benghazi consulate attack wasn't a terrorist thing; it was a protest of an Islamophobic YouTube video that got out of hand.  As if the Islamic radicals brought grenade launchers to a "protest."  This underlines why the liberal media should not be trusted in a "disinformation" fight.  They have a frustrating tendency to put themselves on the side of "information" and conservatives on the side of "disinformation."

No, Trump Did Not 'Storm Off the Set' of Piers Morgan's Interview Show.  On one level, the claim by media personality Piers Morgan that Donald Trump "stormed off" the set when he brought up the 2020 presidential election is just plain creepy.  But if the only side of the story you get is from Morgan trying to goose ratings for his new show — the side the mainstream media wants you to see — Trump comes off as an unhinged maniac.

Deceptive Edits:  Audio Contradicts Piers Morgan, Shows He Warped Trump Interview Ending in Promo.  Audio provided by former President Donald Trump's team to Breitbart News of the end of Trump's interview with Piers Morgan proves that Morgan and his team deceptively edited the interview to make it appear as though it was a contentious ending when it was not.  A 30-second promotional clip that Morgan released on Wednesday afternoon seemed to show Trump flying off the handle and walking out mid-interview as a righteous Morgan asked him tough questions about his views on the 2020 election.  But the full story seems to indicate that Morgan's team deceptively edited the clips together to make it as nasty as possible for Trump — and to drive up the ratings for Morgan's new show.  Morgan's new show, Piers Morgan Uncensored, launches next week on Talk TV, a subsidiary of Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation.

Yes, the Media Bury the Race of Murderers — If They're Not White.  Frank James, the man arrested for Tuesday's New York City subway shooting, is a black nationalist and outspoken racist who railed against whites, Jews, and Hispanics.  A careful reader of the New York Times could be forgiven for overlooking that.  In a nearly 2,000-word article on the attack, James's race is not mentioned.  The same is true for the coverage offered up by Reuters; the Washington Post only mentioned James's race in relation to his condemnation of training programs for "low-income Black youths."  Media critics on the right say that the conspicuous omission of James's race from these news reports illustrates a trend among prestige papers, which deemphasize or omit the race of non-white criminals while playing up the race of white offenders.  But is it a real pattern?  Yes.  A Washington Free Beacon review of hundreds of articles published by major papers over a span of two years finds that papers downplay the race of non-white offenders, mentioning their race much later in articles than they do for white offenders.  These papers are also three to four times more likely to mention an offender's race at all if he is white, a disparity that grew in the wake of George Floyd's death in 2020 and the protests that followed.

Ten Steps to Totalitarianism.  Does anybody still think totalitarianism can't happen here?  Ask yourself how many of these steps we've already galloped past. [... #4] Control over Communication:  There is a reason Western governments have begun aggressively attacking free speech as "misinformation" or "disinformation": the power to communicate ideas to the broader public threatens governments' monopoly over "official" truths.  Traditional forms of mass communication — newspapers, radio broadcasts, and television shows — are operated by so few corporations that the State has no problem influencing, if not outright controlling, the information disseminated to the public.  In contrast, social media platforms and independent publishing sites permit citizens (in theory) to bypass State censors, regulators, and other information gatekeepers to communicate directly with large numbers of other citizens.  See why governments spend so much time targeting free speech as "hate speech" or "harmful information" that must be banned?

The Chicago Thinker Staged a Media Regime Takedown This Week.  This week, the University of Chicago's Institute of Politics (IOP) and The Atlantic magazine hosted a "Disinformation and the Erosion of Democracy" conference, and we have to hand it to IOP Director David Axlerod for bringing in true experts on the subject.  The conference featured some of America's greatest purveyors of disinformation, such as Barack Obama, Brian Stelter, Anne Applebaum, and a few token conservatives, including Jonah Goldberg and Adam Kinzinger.  The media, government, and academia elites speaking at the conference weren't expecting to be challenged as they self-righteously spewed more lies — but our team at the Chicago Thinker was prepared to hold them accountable.  Student journalists from the Chicago Thinker respectfully listened, asked honest questions, and reported.  Our efforts soon went viral, garnering millions of views on social media.  We successfully turned the IOP's "Disinformation Conference" on its head and sparked a national conversation about the corporate media's disinformation.

Has Biden become expendable?  [Scroll down]  Before the 2020 election, a story broke regarding Hunter Biden's laptop, which was abandoned at John Paul Mac Isaac's Delaware repair shop.  Along with reports that Biden's laptop contained disturbing images of a sexual nature, there were allegations that presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son had compromising financial dealings with Ukraine worth millions of dollars.  Tony Bobulinski, a former business associate of Hunter, confirmed on Fox's The Tucker Carlson Show that Hunter's troubling emails were legitimate.  The New York Post confirmed the authenticity of the laptop and published articles regarding some of its shady contents.  That's when the formidable socialist propaganda apparatus went into full cover-up mode.  The New York Times and Washington Post dismissed the laptop story.  Democrats attacked anyone discussing the laptop and labeled the entire subject a Russian disinformation scheme.  Social media banned The New York Post from sharing the story, and countless bloggers sharing the story saw their social media accounts suspended.  Now, 18 months after Biden became president, the corrupt media have come out to say Hunter's laptop is genuine.

The Legacy Media Have Not Conceded the Laptop Reporting — And They Don't Deserve Credit.  In the last two weeks, the New York Times, CNN, and the Washington Post all came forward to admit that the Hunter Biden hard drive — which I originally reported a year and a half ago in the lead-up to the 2020 election and saw those outlets dismiss and smear the stories as "baroque mythology," "made up," "Soviet tradecraft," and "disparaging Biden" — was authentic.  However, despite initial admissions, the media are now stopping short of acknowledging the reporting on the information the hard drive contained — namely, that Joe Biden was a direct beneficiary of Hunter's deals.  Instead, they are inviting the people who come from the very institutions that outright lied and purposely misrepresented the laptop and its contents in the first place to continue lying and misrepresenting the laptop and its contents.

The media lies about Obamacare ... and everything else.  Now that Joe Biden's touting Obamacare and bringing President Obama along for the ride at the White House, the media still acts like Obamacare is great even though Obama and others continuously lied to get it passed and then lied about the results.  It's par for the course because they are such a dishonest crew.  The media also is a great supporter of Obama and Biden as they lied to get the deals done with Iran which continues to support terrorists and continues to pledge death to America[.]  The media acts like it is treasonous to oppose election results and that no one did it before Trump.  Yet they always support Democrats who challenged results in 2000, 2004, and 2016 in Congress.  The media and other Democrats called Trump an illegitimate president for four years.  They impeached him twice for pure garbage.  The media and others spread the lie that a white cop shot Michael Brown when his hands were up, and he was backing away.  How many cops have been injured and killed because of this intentional lie?

A World Gone Mad.  Governments everywhere, including here in the USA, have abandoned God, good government, law and order, common sense, and traditional Judeo-Christian values.  They have jumped in with both feet into the dark and shadow without bothering to look back at seeing what they have already wrought. [...] The political absurdity and hypocrisy has reached the highest level I have ever seen.  The 3.8% unemployment announced in February is an historic achievement, but the 3.6% unemployment rate during the Trump years is a crisis.

The Unanimously Liberal Tilt of the 'Fact Checkers'.  Now that the Ketanji Brown Jackson hearings are complete, we have collected another fascinating exhibit of the leftist tilt of "independent fact checkers."  Just try and find a single fact check on anything Judge Jackson said.  Try and find a single evaluation of any statement by a Democratic politician touting Jackson — from Biden and Dick Durbin on down.  Checking liberals and Democrats is apparently not listed among their job duties.  On March 28, White House deputy press secretary Andrew Bates addressed Judge Jackson's qualifications.  Bates claimed what speaks to the strength of her public record "is the multitude of fact-checks from the press, from retired judges, and from former prosecutors who have dismantled attacks brought by a small group of GOP senators."  "Dismantling" Republican critiques is the job of the Fact Check community?  That's what it looks like.

The Stealing of the Presidency, 2020.  The left-wing news media didn't just poison the information environment with their incessantly negative coverage of President Trump going into the 2020 election.  They also refused to give airtime to important arguments of the Republican campaign — both pro-Trump and anti-Biden — which meant millions of voters cast their ballots knowing only what the media permitted them to know about the candidates.  To measure the true effect of the media's censorship on the election, the Media Research Center asked The Polling Company to survey 1,750 Biden voters in seven swing states (Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin), six of which (all but North Carolina) were called for Biden.  We tested these voters' knowledge of eight news stories — all important topics that our ongoing analysis had shown the liberal news media had failed to cover properly.  We found that a huge majority (82%) of Biden voters were unaware of at least one of these key items, with five percent saying they were unaware of all eight of the issues we tested.  This lack of information proved crucial:  One of every six Biden voters we surveyed (17%) said they would have abandoned the Democratic candidate had they known the facts about one or more of these news stories.  A shift of this magnitude would have changed the outcome in all six of the swing states won by Joe Biden, and Donald Trump would have comfortably won a second term as president.

Flashback: MSNBC, CNN, CBS told viewers Hunter Biden laptop story was Russian disinformation.  The New York Times last week confirmed the authenticity of Hunter Biden's missing laptop, a story which was originally dismissed as Russian disinformation by many liberal media outlets leading up to the 2020 presidential election.  Television hosts, guests and journalists quickly took to the airwaves in October 2020, reassuring viewers that the laptop was "unverifiable," likely tied to the Kremlin, and the product of a smear campaign orchestrated by former President Trump and his allies.  "We start this hour with the tale of international espionage connected to a close confidante of the President of the United States," MSNBC's Ali Velshi said on Oct. 17, 2020.  "The president was reportedly warned that his personal attorney, former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani was the target of a Russian intelligence operation, a story that is unraveling to reveal allegations of disinformation, dirty tricks and a federal probe over Russian efforts to disparage Joe Biden."

15 Media Personalities Who Have Permanently Damaged Their Reputation by Peddling the Lie That the Hunter Biden Laptop Story Was the Work of Russian Propagandists:.  MSNBC's executive producer Kyle Griffin; Publisher of the Ink Anand Giridharadas; Daily Beast reporter Wajahat Ali; Managing editor of Truthorfiction.com Brooke Binkowski; NBC News correspondent Heidi Przybyla; Writer Chip Franklin; MSNBC contributor Ben Rhodes; Washington Post opinion columnist Max Boot; MSNBC's Naveed Jamali; Mother Jones Publication; CNN anchor and Humpty Dumpty cosplayer Brian Stelter; CNN anchor Wolf Blitzer; NBC News correspondent Ken Dilanian; MSNBC Morning Joe's regular contributor Dave Aronberg; and CNN anchor Jim Sciutto.  Congratulations to you — dark marks all around!  For a little fun, we'll have to run this list against the list of folks who insisted Trump colluded with Russia (that's for another time).

The Press Has Lied To Drag The United States Into War Before.  Don't Think They Won't Again.  When you see talking heads uncritically parroting propagandist stories about Ukraine that turn out to be false, from the "Ghost of Kyiv" to that Snake Island story to old photos taken years ago, you should be asking why the corporate media is so willing to spread such fake news (while it censors conservatives for factual critiques of disproven Covid narratives, no less).  It wouldn't be the first time the press lied to pull Americans into war. [...] George Orwell, who fought alongside Republican forces, wrote in his memoir "Homage to Catalonia" that "for the first time, I saw newspaper reports which did not bear any relation to the facts, not even the relationship which is implied in an ordinary lie."  "I saw great battles reported where there had been no fighting, and complete silence where hundreds of men had been killed.  I saw troops who had fought bravely denounced as cowards and traitors, and others who had never seen a shot fired hailed as heroes of imaginary victories; and I saw newspapers in London retailing these lies and eager intellectuals building emotional superstructures over events that never happened," he recalled.  "I saw, in fact, history being written not in terms of what happened but of what ought to have happened according to various 'party lines.'"

Liberals, Conservatives, and Russia:  The Drama Triangle.  With friends like liberal media, who needs enemies?  Their virtue signaling and political spin over Ukraine is so revolting that if I didn't know better, I'd turn against Ukraine like so many conservative commentators already have.  But having lived in both Russia and Ukraine, I know better.  Just as revolting is seeing previously trusted conservative sites and TV hosts defending Russia and tarring Ukraine.  Children act like that when adults apply reverse psychology.  What's their excuse?  I'm not naming names because I'd like to believe they are acting in good faith and are simply misguided by crafty spinners.  Reading Russian and Ukrainian sources in the original, I know exactly who in this war is spinning lies and who is fighting for truth and freedom.  Believe me, not every enemy of the liberal media is our ally or deserves sympathy.  Sometimes the enemy of our enemy is an even bigger enemy.

Tucker Carlson Revisits the Media People Who Manipulated the Hunter Biden Laptop Story.  On his evening broadcast [3/17/2022] Fox news host Tucker Carlson took a historic look at how the media manipulated the Hunter Biden laptop story in order to protect Joe Biden as a candidate.  These same media personalities claim they are credible, and viciously attack anyone who points out their lies.  The example of the Biden laptop should forever dispatch any credibility they claim to hold.  [Video clip]  Not included in the Carlson review, but one of the most transparently biased segments on the Biden laptop issue, was the interview between CNN disinformation specialist Christiane Amanpour and Liz Harrington.  Given the recent revelations about the authenticity of the Biden laptop, watch this video of Amanpour trying to protect the regime.  [Video clip]

Why was the Hunter Biden laptop story covered up?  It's now a familiar pattern — a sensational news story is dismissed by serious journalists as bogus fake right-wing agitprop.  You'd have to be a swivel-eyed conspiracy theorist to believe that.  You don't want to be one of those.  Then, a year or so later, the same important media organs, the same authorities who made you feel crazy for thinking that the story might be credible, turn around and tell you that, yep, it was true all along.  It was just politically awkward to say so at the time. [...] When the New York Post reported in October 2020 on Hunter's marvellous laptop — and the potentially incriminating documents on its hard drive — the New York Times, CNN and others went to great lengths to attack the Post's reporting:  it was, liberals insisted, a Trump-led hit job so therefore not credible.  Twitter and Facebook actually censored the story.  There was an election on and almost nobody wanted to be accused of doing anything that might stop Joe Biden kicking Trump out of the White House.  But the Hunter laptop story raises serious concerns about the Biden family and the role Joe Biden played as Vice President, especially in 2014 when he took the lead on the Ukraine crisis.  It's well-known that Hunter had a ludicrously well paid job at the Ukrainian mining company Burisma, despite having little qualifications for the role beyond his surname.

Another Round of Ukraine Hoaxes Discovered?  The propaganda out of the Ukraine/Hollywood association is continuing unabated.  In a Twitter video today, pushed by Buzzfeed Journalist Christopher Miller, the claim is, "President Zelensky walked to a hospital today to visit wounded Ukrainian soldiers and award them with state honors for their sacrifices."  [Tweet]  However, alert researchers noted the woman to Zelenskyy's left, in the video, is a physician named Inna Derusova.  She was reported to have died on February 26th.  [Tweet]  As we said from the outset, do not take anything at face value.  Question everything that is being presented.  The level of western propaganda to support the intents of the U.S./NATO and multinational community are extreme.

Media Outlets Continue To Portray Pro-Biden Lincoln Project as 'Republican' Organization.  The Lincoln Project is a scandal-plagued super PAC dedicated to supporting President Joe Biden and helping Democrats win elections.  In October 2021, for example, Lincoln Project operatives dressed as neo-Nazis crashed a Glenn Youngkin campaign event in a misguided effort to besmirch the Republican candidate for governor of Virginia.  (It didn't work.)  Nevertheless, mainstream media outlets continue to portray the Lincoln Project and its senior members as "Republicans" or "right-of-center" pundits whose opinions actually matter, or are substantively different from those of a generic liberal pundit.  (They aren't; they don't; they aren't.)  Last month, the Hill published an article about how "Republicans are reveling in their hatred of Joe Biden."  It includes several quotes from Lincoln Project adviser Stuart Stevens, who is described as a "prominent GOP consultant."  Stevens, who wrote a book renouncing his former party, does not even consider himself a Republican.  He has compared Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler and Republican politicians to the genocidal maniac's Nazi enablers.

The Six Biggest "Fake News" Stories About The Russia-Ukraine Conflict.  [Scroll down]  Before I start making points about the fake news being shoved down our throats with Ukraine, I first must make my high-level opinion clear:  Russia's behavior has been horrific, they are the cause of the war, and I strongly support Ukraine with the conflict, particularly the Ukrainian people.  Meanwhile it is also obvious that there is a concerted effort being conducted by the left and their media to mischaracterize the realities on the ground.  The photographs I reference — which include the picture that is featured in this article — have been plastered everywhere, particularly on social media platforms and have been misrepresented by scores of blue check mark buffoons on Twitter.  The truth is, these images show President Volodymyr Zelensky during military exercises last October in the disputed Donbas region in Eastern Ukraine, months before Russia's invasion.

Be skeptical about media coverage of Ukraine.  If you have been monitoring the coverage of the conflict in Ukraine, it is amply clear that a narrative is being pushed.  President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is being compared to Winston Churchill during World War II; he is leading his people during perilous times to become an inspiring figure.  He refused a safe passage offer from the U.S. with the quip:  "I need ammunition, not a ride".  He streams videos from the deserted streets of Ukraine and posts photos with his cabinet.  Photos of Zelenskyy surface in military gear on the battlefront.  To sum it up, Zelensky is being portrayed as Churchill, Rambo and social media influencers all rolled into one. [...] It is all so poignant and inspiring until you fact-check the images.  The photos of Zelensky in military gear were from February 11, 2021, and April 9, 2021.  The photo of the Russian soldier holding Ukrainian girls at gunpoint was a 2005 photo from the West Bank.  Neither the first lady of Ukraine nor the former Miss Ukraine is joining the armed forces.  The teary farewell of Ukrainian soldiers amidst the invasion was actually a photo of the happy homecoming moment of U.S. Marines.

'Fact Checkers' Silent as Lyin' Joe Biden Perpetuates Disgusting Capitol Riot Whopper.  In the immediate aftermath of the Capitol riot, it became very clear that the mainstream media and Democrats were going to milk the incident for all it was worth.  Initial reports talked of Capitol police officers being "murdered" by Trump-supporting rioters as they broke through glass doorways and breached the Capitol building.  It was those early false stories that were in part used by Democrats to make their impeachment "case" against then-President Donald Trump.  Within a few days, that narrative along with others began to implode.  But it took a few weeks before we saw the first major signs that the media was trying to correct itself.

The Right 'Loves Putin' And Other Lies The Media Tell About Trump And Russia.  What is it about Russia and Vladimir Putin that forces the American national media to lie, make things up, and blurt out statements that have no basis in reality?  The latest fiction is that Republicans and conservatives have a newfound affinity for Putin.  If you only watched MSNBC or read The New York Times, you'd be forgiven for holding the impression that all of Fox News and the Republican party have draped themselves in Russian flags and set up GoFundMes for the invasion of Ukraine.  The Times on Sunday [2/27/2022] ran the headline, "How the American Right Stopped Worrying and Learned to Love Russia," by Emily Tamkin. [...] Her argument might have been a little stronger if she included more searing examples of praise for Putin, like the time Trump called him a "master tactician."  Wait, sorry.  That was actually how The New York Times itself described the Russian president in mid-February.  And also in October 2020.

Facebook's Election Fact-Checker Spreads Fake Footage Of Artillery Impacts In A Populated Area In Ukraine.  When Russia launched an attack on Ukraine earlier this week, people around the world watched in shock and horror as airstrikes hit the country and tanks began rolling in.  "The prayers of the world are with the people of Ukraine tonight as they suffer an unprovoked and unjustified attack by Russian military forces," wrote President Joe Biden in a tweet Wednesday night.  But in the last few days, it's become clear that while some of the footage and images being disseminated across social media are depicting the tragic beginnings of a new war, some are not actually what they appear.  Some of the photos and footage being shared on Twitter, Facebook, and TikTok appear to be fake, some are from previous conflicts years ago, explosions in other countries, or even from video games.

A New Age of Barbarism.  Political leaders in the US, Canada, Germany, and France — all NATO countries — got back on script yesterday. [...] The part we do not see is that many of these people — together with media organs and administrators of many deep-state bureaucracies — are absolutely thrilled to start a new season.  Away with the appalling mismanagement of the pathogen.  Away with public anger toward the lockdowns and mandates.  Forget the collapse in children's literacy, the rise in cancer, the waves of depression, the trucker protests, the collapsing polls of many elected leaders, and forget too the inflation, the federal debt, supply-chain snarls and goods shortages.  Forget all the astonishing botches of everything.  Life was never as good in living memory as when we had a solid foreign enemy named Russia with a leader with a name and a face.  Everything wrong with the world could be personalized, and with storybook thematics:  good vs evil, freedom vs despotism, democracy vs dictatorship.  This great struggle was so good for both sides that they made it last 40 years.

Cops, convoys, conservatives, and tyranny.  The Mainstream Media inform us that Canadian authorities have "cleared out" the truckers who had the temerity to think they could peacefully protest their government's COVID vaccination-and-quarantine mandates.  Note the choice of terminology:  "Cleared out," as one would clear out an infestation of vermin.  In the propaganda game, words must be chosen carefully and deliberately, and the propaganda-meisters of today (who not only "manage" the news, but frequently just invent it) make the infamous Dr. Goebbels look like a mere tyro. [...] Anyone who's spent time on America's highways and observed big trucks knows that the Confederate battle flag (the "Stars'n'Bars") is an emblem frequently displayed on such trucks, and not just in the South, in numbers far in excess of those few that were seen on Canadian trucks.  But the handful of such flags seen on the Canadian trucks were enough for "journalists" to declare that such flags were proof that the Freedom Convoy was in reality a rally of "white supremacists."

Why They're So Afraid of the Truckers.  [Scroll down]  Claims linking the Canadian truckers' convoy to Nazis appeared in the Guardian, Vox, NPR, the Atlantic, BBC, the (ironically-named) Independent, NBC, Reuters, the Washington Post, the New York Times, and many more.  Each of those 10 sources contains a line similar to this, "The truckers have been joined by various groups, including some displaying Nazi symbols and damaging public monuments."  None contained one picture or video to support the smear.  The smears remind us of the recent effort to associate the Republican candidate for governor in Virginia with fascists.  In that incident, anti-Republican activists, including the Lincoln Project, donned costumes to pose as racist supporters of the candidate.  We're also reminded of the recent criminal conviction of Jussie Smollett for staging a fake hate crime to smear Trump supporters.  We're also reminded of the many successful lawsuits by Nick Sandmann who the media falsely accused of hate crimes.  A more responsible media would have provided proof before coordinating yet another smear against a political movement.

The absurd 'Russiagate' Pulitzer of the NY Times and Washington Post.  "For deeply sourced, relentlessly reported coverage in the public interest," the citation from the Pulitzer Prize board begins, "that dramatically furthered the nation's understanding of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and its connections to the Trump campaign, the president-elect's transition team and his eventual administration."  Except the journalism that the Pulitzers honored — a 2018 National Reporting prize shared by the Washington Post and the New York Times for reporting on Russiagate — did no such thing.  It led to a dramatic misunderstanding, suggesting that Donald Trump colluded with Vladimir Putin to help sway the 2016 election — a grand conspiracy that we now know never existed.  Oh, it was "deeply sourced," in that deep-state Democratic bureaucrats, furious that Trump had won the White House, were falling over themselves to talk anonymously to reporters.

Arizona Gubernatorial Candidate Kari Lake Destroys Fake News Media.  Trump-endorsed Arizona Gubernatorial Candidate Kari Lake's first television campaign advertisement will air.  Her ad will only run during news shows on news stations across Arizona.  Lake has a history of exposing fake news [...] and she is doing it now with a commercial that they must play.  The video, titled "Rigged Elections Have Consequences" calls out the fake news media for their silence on the 2020 election and lists the terrible consequences we face, including our weak southern border.

5 Media Lies About The Latest Special Counsel Revelations.  One week ago today, Special Counsel John Durham filed a motion in the government's criminal case against former Hillary Clinton campaign attorney Michael Sussmann.  That motion, in requesting the court obtain Sussmann's waiver of any conflicts of interest held by his lawyers on the record, provided in excruciating detail the factual basis for the purported conflicts.  In doing so, it revealed that "enemies of Donald Trump surveilled the internet traffic at Trump Tower, at his New York City apartment building, and later at the executive office of the president of the United States, then fed disinformation about that traffic to intelligence agencies hoping to frame Trump as a Russia-connected stooge."

Axios Tries, and Fails, to Spin the Bad Economy.  At Axios, Dan Primack tries to wave away the terrible polling on the state of the economy by pretending that it is the inevitable "byproduct of a politics in which the economy is reflexively disparaged by those out of power."  It's not.  It's the "byproduct" of an economy that isn't good.

All the Lies That Are Fit to Print.  Ashley Rindberg's [new book] exposes the New York Times and its longstanding ideological roots.  Rindberg offers an illuminating historical study of how the Times repeatedly has engaged in spreading lies about National Socialism, Communism, and other authoritarian regimes and various political situations around the world.  This has been a clear pattern for decades, claims Rindsberg, and it's not difficult to see what he means.  During World War II, for example, the Times refused to acknowledge the gravity of Hitler's regime, and the correspondents would often, quite literally and openly, use Nazi propaganda points in their articles.  Was it denial of the reality that Hitler's regime brought about or actual antisemitic support for the regime?  In 1935, Frederick Birchall, one of the Times' journalists, wrote an article about the Olympics that were then taking place in Berlin.  The anti-Jewish riots were happening during the athletic event yet Birchall decided to minimize them and focus on the glory of the Olympics.

Why Newspapers Refuse to Correct Errors.  Many iconic U.S. newspapers sport slogans that seek to explain their mission — and self-image.  "All the News That's Fit to Print" has been called "the seven most famous words in American journalism."  "Democracy Dies in Darkness" was an overtly partisan call to arms.  But the most telling section of a newspaper's true values is its "Corrections" page.  That's where journalism distinguishes itself from just about every other profession, routinely and straightforwardly admitting its mistakes.  Who else does that?  It is a soul-crushing enterprise.  A single misspelled name is all it takes to ruin an otherwise stellar article.  We reporters may forget the topic of the piece we wrote last week, while the error five years ago is seared into our memories.  But it is also crucial:  Reader trust is the lifeblood of journalism.  If you can't believe what you read, why bother?

Avenatti and the Media Swindlers.  If you want to feed on fake news, be bombarded by endless praise-filled coverage of scoundrels whose fame is undeserved, and listen to just plain idiocy, keep watching television news.  With the latest conviction of former media star Michael Avenatti, I've made my case.  Not only does the story of his rise and fall illustrate my point, but the failure of the media that gave him so much praise and coverage is not the end of it.  Their lack of curiosity about his funding, even to this day, further condemns them as mere propagandists for the Left.

American Truckers Organizing Freedom Convoy to DC but Here Come the Censors.  The Freedom Convoy that made it across Canada from Vancouver to Ottawa is now occupying the streets in front of Parliament and is being supported by people in their efforts against vaccine mandates. [...] American truckers are now trying to follow in the footsteps of their Northern brethren — organizing a similar convoy from California to Washington, D.C., to stand against government overreach.  But Facebook is trying to stop them, removing the page from which they were organizing the effort.  Facebook claimed that the page was violating policies around QAnon.  Just as there was an effort to smear the Canadian effort by Justin Trudeau and some in liberal media, even claiming it was somehow associated with Russia, it looks like they're going after the U.S. effort.

Canadian Media Claims Russia is Behind the Truckers Freedom Protest.  As if the media can't get anymore desperate to brush aside the fact their own citizens are adamantly opposed to the vax mandates, this fake news host just claimed the entire thing is due to Russia.  Once again proving the leftist media will do anything to make up a news story in order to fit their current agenda, which currently appears to be start a war with Russia to deflect everyones attention away from the fact people are openly rebelling against them.  If a war does start, make no mistake, the government will try to round up people who have zero to do with Russia and everything to do with not complying with the leftist globalist agenda.  [Video clip]

When Will People Finally See the Obvious?  Consider the number of things the Left has been willing to lie to the American people about in recent years.  The short list includes:  COVID, suppressing its origins and effective means of treatment; January 6, 2021, touted as worse than Pearl Harbor and 9/11 combined and jailing Capitol trespassers for over a year without trial dates; Hunter Biden's laptop, immediately and roundly dismissed as "Russian disinformation"; destructive and deadly riots blithely labeled "mostly peaceful protests"; and parents at school board meetings protesting critical race theory viciously defamed and treated as would-be "domestic terrorists."  But between all of these (and so many more) major news stories, Americans en masse have begun to wake up and search for the truth outside what's being spoon-fed (and in some cases shovel-fed) to them by the corporate left-wing media. [...] So why has this leap of faithlessness not jumped over to the obvious facts of the 2020 election?  Those currently in power have a clear track record of covering up the truth on major news stories, but we're somehow supposed to believe what they say about the 2020 election?

Is This 'Leaked' Video Real Or Staged?  The Khaki-clad Patriot Front group was out protesting again today — This time at the March for Life in Washington DC.  Two weeks ago this mysterious khaki-clad group showed up at the Chicago March for Life for some reason. [...] In spite of all that there seems to be little media interest in digging deep to find out what's really going on with this group and who its members are.  There is, however, plenty of interest in videos that purport to show Patriot Front members using Nazi language and gestures.  One that is said to have been leaked is making the rounds.  Does this seem staged, or authentic?  [Video clip]

The Editor says...
Ask yourself:  Who would benefit if it's genuine?  Nobody.  Who would benefit if it's fake but believable?  The Democrats.

Gorsuch, Sotomayor Push Back On NPR Story Claiming He Refused To Wear A Mask Despite Request.  Associate Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Sonia Sotomayor put out a joint statement on Wednesday denying a recent report that Gorsuch refused to wear a mask during oral arguments, forcing Sotomayor to participate in proceedings remotely.  National Public Radio legal correspondent Nina Totenberg claimed in a Tuesday column that Gorsuch refused a request from Chief Justice John Roberts that all justices wear masks during oral arguments as a result of Sotomayor's fears about the Omicron variant.  Sotomayor, who has diabetes, "has not attended the justices' weekly conference in person, joining instead by telephone" as a result of Gorsuch's refusal, Totenberg wrote.  "Reporting that Justice Sotomayor asked Justice Gorsuch to wear a mask surprised us.  It is false.  While we may sometimes disagree about the law, we are warm colleagues and friends," the two justices said.

NPR's Story About a SCOTUS Spat over Justices Wearing Masks Looks Like a Massive Pile of Fake News.  It seems even the most prestigious legal institution in the land is not immune to COVID, that is the politics of it all.  The Court did strike down the employer-based COVID vaccine mandate the Biden administration was pushing that was going to be enforced by OSHA. Yet, it didn't come before we all saw how wrong the liberal wing of the Court was on the issue.  I'm not talking about legal differences.  I'm talking about facts.  Justice Sonia Sotomayor claimed that 100,000 kids were hospitalized with COVID and on ventilators.  She also said Omicron was just as deadly as Delta.  Not true.  This is what happens when you only watch CNN or MSNBC all day.  These people are deciding the fate of millions in the workforce and four of them consumed, digested, and believed in pure science fiction.  Luckily, that OSHA mandate was struck down 6-3.  Yet, the COVID antics have not stopped.  There are reports that Chief Justice John Roberts ordered all members to wear a mask at oral arguments.  Justice Gorsuch refused which forced Justice Sotomayor to work remotely.  Now, here's where the red flag comes in — it's an NPR story.

More about NPR.

Conspiracies as Realities, Realities as Conspiracies.  Consider that the Trump election of 2016, the transition, and the first two years of the Trump presidency were undermined by a media-progressive generated hoax of "Russian collusion."  The "bombshell" and "walls are closing in" mythologies dominated the network news and cable outlets.  It took five years to expose them as rank agit-prop.  Robert Mueller and his "dream team" consumed $40 million of Americans' money and 22 months of our time — to find the nothingburger that most of the country already knew was nothing.  Yet the subtext of the 2018 Democratic takeover of the House was the media narrative that Trump, as Hillary Clinton put it, was an "illegitimate" president, due to Russian collusion.  Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper claimed on national television that Trump was a "Russian asset."  Former CIA head John Brennan assured the nation that the president was "treasonous," due to his supposed "lies to the American people."  All sorts of politicians, retired military, and news anchors echoed the charges.  The lies and myths of has-been British spy Christopher Steele made him a leftist hero.  They were repeated ad nauseam as truth.

Is the tide finally turning?  On the COVID front, suddenly we see a rash of what we used to call in the news business "skin-backs."  In plain English, that would be corrections.  In journalism and politics, that's particularly painful, so skin-back captures it pretty well.  I think the Covidians have already begun The Big Skin-Back.  So many lies for so long are becoming so obviously lies that they need to get ahead of the story.  Otherwise, their only option is to continue to defend the lies in the face of overwhelming mounting evidence of their duplicity and, after losing battle after battle, completely destroy their credibility, even with mainstream media.

Fact Check:  Fact-Checkers Falsely Claim They Are Fact-Checkers.  Defending the ruling regime in Washington is a tough job with a lot of moving parts.  To keep everyone on message and to make sure that only the regime's message is the controlling one in the public square, you need committed politicians, woke multinational corporations, corporate media, and devoutly loyal followers who will echo that message far and wide.  Not all of these echo chambers are created equal.  For example, in the corporate media, some get to host to the fancy nighttime cable shows and make massive salaries while others have to handle the less glamorous and talent-demanding work, like pumping out endless "fact checks."  These lower-level operatives serve their purpose in service of the regime, however.  They supply the committed masses with clickbait that can be amplified by those eager to believe that the regime's message is not only preferable but is the absolute and only truth.  They exist to make us believe that to be on the side of the regime's message is to be on the side of the facts.

January 6 and the real 'Big Lie'.  [Scroll down]  The real Big Lie has been — and is still being — aided, abetted, and promoted by the Big Liars in the mainstream media.  No longer lie-detectors, they are lie-projectors, smear merchants, enemies of the people so full of it that industrial-sized enemas couldn't clean them out.  Bizarrely binary, they are nothing more than Deep State-approved mouth organs of the Democrat party, essentially state-run organizations when Democrats are in power and sworn enemies of the state when Republicans hold office.  They are Merchants of Menace.  The clowns at MSNBC, the Lolita-lovers at CNN, the "ladies" on The View, and the partisan pseudo-journalist hacks at fish-wrap factories like The New York Times and The Washington Post all routinely say the same things... in the same way.  They consistently beclown themselves but are not open-minded enough to realize it.

Top five media lies of 2021.  [#2] Ma'Khia Bryant was murdered by a racist police officer:  In April, a police officer shot Ma'Khia Bryant, a black teenager in Columbus, Ohio, as she was trying to stab another girl.  The footage from the officer's body camera made it very clear that the shooting was justified and the officer acted to save the woman's life.  The corporate media ran with the story that Ma'Khia Bryant had been murdered by a police officer because of her race.  Many outlets, such as the New York Times and The Daily Beast, even claimed she was unarmed at the moment of the shooting.

Pandemic Response Will Be Used As Model for "Climate Crisis" Response.  Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, experts have assured worried populations that their policies would contain the virus, prevent infections, and save lives.  After two weeks of shutting down the country and sealing ourselves off, we would "flatten the curve" and then proceed with our lives as normal.  As we round out the second year of the "two weeks," I also recall that Biden's COVID advisor Dr. Anthony Facui assured us that once we hit 70% vaccination rates, we would no longer see surges in coronavirus cases. [...] One of the advantages about living through this pandemic is that we have the ability to see scientific "experts" fail in their projections in real time.  We have also observed politically connected bureaucrats stifle robust and essential scientific debate, as they colluded with the media to silence well qualified opposition to the latest pet theories and policies.  For example, Dr. Francis Collins, then director of the National Institutes of Health, sent an email to Facui concerned about the Great Barrington Declaration, a statement developed by Harvard's Martin Kulldorff, Oxford's Sunetra Gupta and Stanford's Jay Bhattacharya against blanket pandemic lockdowns.  The two organized a media smear campaign to paint these scientists as "fringe".

A Myth is Born:  How CDC, FDA, and Media Wove a Web of Ivermectin Lies That Outlives The Truth.  When a Texas cattleman, seventy-nine, died last September in New Mexico after contracting covid, his family never anticipated the worldwide headlines that would ensue.  In a ballyhooed press conference, New Mexico Human Services Secretary Dr. David Scrase, the state's top health chief, announced New Mexico's first ivermectin "overdose," soon adding a second fatality allegedly from "ivermectin toxicity."  Now, Scrase has acknowledged that his repeated, what he called "offhand," assertions were groundless.  Two deaths were not caused by ivermectin, a long-used generic drug that was emerging as a covid treatment.  Instead, he said that the pair died because they "actually just delayed their care with covid."  That is a big difference.  Scrase backpedaled on December 1 in a little-noticed online press briefing and only after we pressed his agency to provide evidence for its claims of so-called "ivermectin deaths."  Officials had repeatedly said they were awaiting a toxicology report on the cattleman's death.  Yet we learned that the report was never even ordered or done, and, moreover, the man's death was ruled by the state's coroner as being from "natural" causes.

In 2021, Media Did More to Erode Trust Than to Repair It.  The case of actor Jussie Smollett's fake hate crime came to a conclusion this month, revealing that media outlets still are eager to pounce on a racially divisive story and cast blame, but reluctant to examine themselves when the story falls apart. [...] Earlier this month, Smollett was convicted of five of six counts of disorderly conduct, all stemming from his lies to Chicago police about the "hate crime" he staged with the help of others.  And how did the media react to this outcome?  Not well, and in some cases, not at all.  ABC News, which had featured Smollett and allowed the actor to elaborate on the hoax in 2019, failed to tell viewers that his trial was underway.  When Smollett's guilty verdicts were announced, the entire prime-time lineup on MSNBC completely ignored the news, despite the fact that the network was one of the principal promoters of Smollett's original claims.  An incredible headline on CNN muttered:  "Jussie Smollett guilty on some charges," blatantly downplaying the multiple verdicts.  It would have been more accurate to say "most charges," or even better, the precisely accurate "five of six."  And finally, some wondered why we were talking about the Smollett verdicts at all.

Glenn Greenwald Points To The One Moment That Changed The Pandemic And Destroyed Trust In Media.  Journalist Glenn Greenwald said in a Tuesday [12/28/2021] Twitter thread that there was one single moment that changed media coverage of the coronavirus pandemic — and that when it "flipped overnight," it destroyed trust in media.  The death of George Floyd — at the hands of former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin — and the massive protests it inspired prompted a near-180 turn from multiple media outlets that had just spent the previous weeks telling Americans that the only patriotic thing to do was stay home to stop the spread of the virus.  "This was a pivotal moment in the pandemic's history," Greenwald began.  "For 4 months, the message was clear and unrelenting:  everyone must stay home.  Those who leave — even to go to a deserted beach — are reckless sociopaths.  It flipped overnight to endorse a mass protest movement liberals liked." [...] "That episode single-handedly destroyed trust in public health officials, proving they'd politicize their expertise when convenient," Greenwald continued, referencing experts who had joined media broadcasts to argue that systemic racism and police brutality posed greater health risks than the rapidly-spreading virus.  "Corporate media celebrated a [...] lawyer shaming families at deserted beaches, then — overnight! — cheered densely packed street protests."

Biden's Approval Ratings Are Inflated.  There has been a lot of publicity around Joe Biden's poor approval ratings, but I think his actual standing with the electorate is worse than they indicate.  Take, for example, the Rasmussen survey, which I think is valuable because 1) unlike other polls, it samples likely voters, and 2) it polls constantly, publishing a three-day rolling average.  Thus, whether the numbers are "right" or not, they are a good indicator of trends.  In Joe Biden's case, the trend has been obvious:  his approval rating quickly dropped to around 42%, and there it sits.  But I don't believe that 40+% of voters, surveying the wreckage of the last year, actually think that Biden is doing a good job.  Some of them are lying to the pollster, out of party loyalty.  We saw the same thing during the Obama administration.  It is more revealing to see how voters assess a president's performance on specific issues.

People Demand Rachel Maddow, MSNBC Apologize for False COVID Comments.  [Scroll down]  But Fauci wasn't the only one facing criticism today.  The other person was Rachel Maddow.  However, it wasn't for anything that she said recently; it was for comments that she made back in March that people were now calling into question.  Viewers were demanding an apology from Maddow and MSNBC for this video from March 29, in which she claimed that if you were vaccinated, it would stop the virus in its tracks and prevent transmission. [Tweet with video clip]  Maddow said, "Now we know that the vaccines work well enough that the virus stops with every vaccinated person."  "A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus, the virus does not infect them, the virus cannot then use that person to go anywhere else," she continued.  "It cannot use a vaccinated person as a host to go get more people."  Maddow stated that vaccines "would get us to the end of this," meaning the end of the pandemic.  This is just untrue.  While the transmission is allegedly less likely, vaccinated people can still get the virus and spread it.

The Covid fear factory is trembling.  [Scroll down]  At this point the question naturally arises:  Why is it that the public health establishment and the media are working hard to generate a tide of public hysteria around Omicron? [...] It's not by chance that the media is obsessing about case count.  Case counts are one of the most deceptive measures of pandemic severity when symptoms are mild to non-existent in the majority of the infected.

What do the UK Vaccine Surveillance Reports tell us?  [Scroll down]  Each time when we've heard "The pandemic of the unvaccinated" from the media and politicians, we can be reasonably sure that they are not talking about the actual health of those people, for whatever reason, do not take the vaccine.  Instead, they have actually been concerned about "Overwhelming the healthcare system" with unvaccinated people.  However, the raw data from the UK health systems shows that more vaccinated people than unvaccinated ones were using the healthcare system.  There is no such "raw data" available in the U.S. All we can find is some kind of rate.  CDC once had a CDC MMWR report that was based on the data from 13 U.S. jurisdictions.  That report stated that, once Delta appeared, vaccinated people reduced their risk of infection by five times, and both their risk of hospitalization and risk of death by more than ten times.  The report acknowledges that the data from 13 jurisdictions "might not be generalizable," and that's true.  It's nonsense.  Nevertheless, the Mainstream Media and politicians immediately started to propagandize based on that report.

Here There Be Monsters.  Tech company oligarchs, media conglomerates, and pharmaceutical companies have collaborated with the federal government to encapsulate Americans in a fantasy of incomplete, misleading, false, and contrived information.  Unlike the federal government, the predominant social media are not constrained in disregarding the First Amendment, and routinely engage in outright censorship and speech suppression.  As long as it serves the government's purposes, curtailing its opponents' free speech is fine.  All U.S. "mainstream" media are owned and controlled by six corporations.  Those corporations call the shots on what does and does not get news coverage, how that coverage is fashioned, and its content.  To believe the U.S. "mainstream" media represent a free press is more an act of faith than believing in Santa Claus or the Tooth Fairy.  Acts of outrageous media hypocrisy occur on a daily basis, always favoring the Left/government's preferences.  News censorship and content control are hallmarks of totalitarian government, and the U.S. checks both boxes today.

Here is the Mainstream Media in Israel Fabricating a Story.  If you wanted to see how corrupt the mainsteam media outlets are across the planet, here is several Israeli news organizations working together to fabricate the entire pandemic fraud that has swept the world.  They even recorded themselves setting the entire thing up, luckily, it allows us to see just how far they're going to setup these stories about hospitals being overwhelmed, mass deaths, etc.  [Video clip]

It's Beginning to Look a Lot Like Pravda.  Interesting short segment from Sky News interviewing the smiling U.K. Health Minister Gillian Keegan about the intense U.K. response to the Omicron variant and the new restrictions announced by government officials.  Great Britain is preparing for hundreds-of-thousands of Omicron cases.  [Video clip]

The High Price of Bidenomics.  American humorist Edgar Wilson Nye famously observed, "Wagner's music is better than it sounds."  Recently, the White House and its numerous allies in the "news" media have been telling an increasingly skeptical electorate a similarly self-refuting tale about the Biden economy.  Typical of the stories that have appeared in major news outlets is this howler from CNN's Julian Zelizer, who insists that there is "a huge disconnect between the economic data and the way voters are feeling."  Anyone naïve enough to believe such balderdash will be disabused of their illusions by reading Friday's Bureau of Labor Statistics report showing that the consumer price index (CPI) has risen by 6.8 percent during the 12-month period ending in November.

Liberal Media Pushes Bonkers Conspiracy Theory About Florida Governor Ron DeSantis.  Florida Governor Ron DeSantis is moving to create a civilian corps in his state to help when natural disasters like hurricanes hit.  Twenty-two other states already have the exact same thing, but the media is portraying it as a private militia to do DeSantis' personal bidding.  This is the same media that is constantly accusing others of spreading conspiracy theories.

Willie Horton and the Democratic Party's Greatest Fear.  [Scroll down]  Fast-forward to November 21, 2021. In the tranquil suburban community of Waukesha, Wisconsin, a vicious bigot named Darrell Brooks — free on bail with multiple pending felonies, one being his recent attempt to run over his onetime girlfriend with his SUV — allegedly drove through a Christmas parade, running down as many innocent people as he could, killing at least five, injuring some sixty more.  Media-watchers have already begun to comment on how relatively little detailed coverage there has been.  We have noticed blatant photo-editing techniques used to lighten the perpetrator's skin in media photos.  We have seen a surprising lack of MSM interest in both the man's history and his apparent motive.  We have seen, if anything, a textbook case in how to all but bury a story too big to dismiss.

Why Jussie Smollett deserves to be punished for his shameful hoax.  On January 29, 2019, African American actor Jussie Smollett who is gay claimed that two masked men wearing MAGA hats hurled racist and homophobic abuses at him.  He claims that they proceeded to punch him, pour a chemical substance over him, put a rope around his neck and berate him with "this is MAGA country."  He also claimed that he had received a hate mail consisting of a barrage of racist invectives.  The US mainstream media gleefully carried and amplified the story because it fits their narrative of far-right Trump supporters persecuting a gay man of color.  Instances such as these explain why very few in the US trust their news media.

The Cynical and Dangerous Weaponization of the "White Supremacist" Label.  Within hours of the August 25, 2020, shootings in Kenosha, Wisconsin — not days, but hours — it was decreed as unquestioned fact in mainstream political and media circles that the shooter, Kyle Rittenhouse, was a "white supremacist."  Over the next fifteen months, up to and including his acquittal by a jury of his peers on all charges, this label was applied to him more times than one can count by corporate media outlets as though it were proven fact.  Indeed, that Rittenhouse was a "white supremacist" was deemed so unquestionably true that questioning it was cast as evidence of one's own racist inclinations (defending a white supremacist).  Yet all along, there was never any substantial evidence, let alone convincing proof, that it was true.  This fact is, or at least should be, an extraordinary, even scandalous, event:  a 17-year-old was widely vilified as being a white supremacist by a union of national media and major politicians despite there being no evidence to support the accusation.  Yet it took his acquittal by a jury who heard all the evidence and testimony for parts of the corporate press to finally summon the courage to point out that what had been Gospel about Rittenhouse for the last fifteen months was, in fact, utterly baseless.

It was an act of intentional, race-based, black-on-white, vehicular homicide.  It was not accidental.
Waukesha Parade Attack:  Debra Messing Blasts Media For Downplaying Massacre As An 'Accident'.  Actress Debra Messing took aim at the media for "minimizing" the attack that occurred at a Christmas parade in Waukesha, Wisconsin.  Darrell Brooks has been charged with intentional homicide after driving his SUV through a crowded street commemorating the holiday season, resulting in the deaths of six people ages 8 to 81 and injuring dozens more.  However, many media outlets had been referring to the attack as a "parade crash," downplaying the intent prosecutors have leveled against the career criminal.

Everything the Media Told You About Kyle Rittenhouse Was Wrong.  Last week's acquittal of Kyle Rittenhouse, the teenager charged with the murder of two men in Kenosha, Wis., likely came as a shock to millions of Americans who had relied on the media to inform their understanding of the case.  From the time Rittenhouse killed two men on the streets of Kenosha last August, media characterizations of the event suggested his conviction was a foregone conclusion.  He was a troubled kid, "a high school dropout who viewed law enforcement as his personal heroes" and had "an affinity for guns."  Many took pains to point out that he had attended a rally for then-president Donald Trump.  A New York Times report found that he "showed strong support for officers."  The Daily Beast referred to him as a "fanatic."  The men Rittenhouse shot in self-defense quickly became sympathetic figures.  Anthony Huber, who attacked Rittenhouse with a skateboard, died doing something "heroic," according to CNN — which was quoting Huber's girlfriend.  In a piece that has since been edited, the network described Joseph Rosenbaum, a convicted child rapist, as somebody who would "make you laugh out of nowhere."

It's time to revisit the coverage of Kyle Rittenhouse.  [Thread reader]  With the news that he has been acquitted on all counts, don't forget the ways that Dems and the corporate press came together to craft a false narrative in his case. [...] We need to start with the media coverage that framed this case in the public mind.  To the press, Rittenhouse was as good as guilty when the news broke.  So naturally, to @CNN, the people he shot in self defense were heroes & those defending him had "justified murder."  [Tweets]  This wasn't just limited to CNN.  [The New York Times] put out what amounts to a hit piece on Rittenhouse because his "social media accounts showed strong support for officers."  They even put out a piece about how right-wingers attacking protestors was some sort of phenomenon.  [Tweets]  Never to be outdone, @MSNBC said the shooting was white supremacy and then went on to blame — who else — President Trump for "fueling violence," sowing "chaos and disorder" and "encouraging vigilante justice"[.]

How Unethical Were the Prosecutors Trying to Put Kyle Rittenhouse in Prison?  Let Us Count the Ways.  Americans, already disgusted by the FBI, manufactured Trump Russia scandals, and counterintelligence investigations into concerned parents like they're members of Al Qaeda, closely watched this case and were repulsed by the chicanery used to prosecute Rittenhouse.  They're supposed to be the justice guys, right?  It's a wonder that Rittenhouse was found not guilty on all counts.  You can blame Leftist propagandists or your laziness if you believed that Rittenhouse's assailants were black, or that his gun was illegal, or that he brought it "across state lines," or that he was a "chaos tourist" and a "vigilante."  But there's a special Mike Nifong-sized ring of hell for prosecutors who introduce these slanders into a courtroom, knowing that their subterfuge might put a kid away for the rest of his life.  Thomas Binger and Jim Kraus did this in many ways, by invoking lies — that they knew were lies — into pre-trial bail hearings, motions, and then ultimately into the courtroom itself in the trial.  All of these lies were dutifully transcribed by friendly journalists.

The Rittenhouse trial:  Our corporate media and big tech are truly sinister.  Nothing more conclusively proves the depraved nature of the American media than the Rittenhouse trial.  The then-seventeen-year-old, as numerous videos of the event proved, was clearly under attack by the three men who chased him and he subsequently shot in self-defense.  There is simply no doubt about that.  There was no racial aspect to what happened.  The two men who died were criminals.  Jacob Rosenbaum had just served fifteen years in prison for anally raping five boys, ages 9 [to] 11.  That night he set a dumpster on fire, was swinging a heavy chain around and screaming the n-word.  Huber, the man who had hit Rittenhouse with a skateboard, also had a criminal record for domestic abuse.  So did Grosskreutz who admitted under oath to pointing a gun at Rittenhouse's head before Rittenhouse pulled the trigger injuring his arm.  Jacob Blake, the thug whose shooting by police got the riot going thanks to the media, was a rapist as well.  He was in the act of kidnapping a child and threatening the police with a knife when he was shot. [...] There are people today, even after the verdict, who think Rittenhouse shot Black men, that Rittenhouse was there, in the city his father lives in, to purposefully engage with BLM rioters, that his gun was illegal.  None of that is true.

Goal Of Rittenhouse Prosecution and Media Manipulation Is To Render "Citizens Not Being Able To Defend Themselves".  [Scroll down]  So the narrative is Kyle Rittenhouse is a militia member who crossed state lines with a weapon to shoot peaceful protest is protestors.  None of those things are true, other than he did cross the state line.  Like that's some big deal nowadays, but he wasn't carrying a weapon.  The weapon was already in Wisconsin.  He was lawfully able to possess it in Wisconsin.  That's why the judge threw out the charge of being a minor in possession.  He wasn't in an militia.  Remember there's certainly no evidence introduced to that.  And he didn't shoot peaceful protestors.  He shoot shot three extremely violent people who tried to kill him.  So that media narrative is out there.  It will never go away.  And that has framed the case for political purposes, that this is white supremacy on trial here.  So you have Black Lives Matter protesters out there claiming racism for a white kid who shot three white people.  This has nothing to do with race yet.  That's what it's turned into.

Once more with feeling!  Media coverage of the Rittenhouse case was hot garbage.  We covered this territory during the trial but now that it's over it's worth remembering that the media's coverage of this case was terrible from the moment it happened.  Today, Drew Holden put together a thread hitting some of the lowlights: [...]

10 Media Myths Exploded During the Kyle Rittenhouse Trial.  [#1] "White supremacist":  There was never any evidence that Rittenhouse was a "white supremacist," even by the time Biden made that false claim last September.  The prosecution confirmed that fact during the trial when it failed to produce evidence of any kind that Rittenhouse was a "white supremacist" or had racial motivations.  The owners of the car dealership who asked Rittenhouse and others for help were Indian-American. [...] [#7] Rittenhouse "crossed state lines":  It is true that Rittenhouse is from Antioch, Illinois.  But he was working last summer as a lifeguard in Wisconsin, and his father lives in Kenosha — a fact that tripped the prosecution when they tried to portray Rittenhouse as a kind of outsider, a "chaos tourist" who neither cared about nor was familiar with the local community.

Kyle Rittenhouse and the False Narrative.  The Kyle Rittenhouse trial is an important moment in American culture, because this isn't just about Kyle Rittenhouse. [...] For me, the unacknowledged heroes of the Rittenhouse case are the intrepid videographers who were on the scene recording what was taking place on the street.  Without them, Rittenhouse would probably be facing a real risk of being convicted for double murder.  Why?  Because he's dealing with a dishonest prosecutor, who doesn't hesitate to say things he knows are misleading; dishonest detectives, who don't hesitate to twist the truth; and a dishonest media, which has been brazenly lying about what happened between Rittenhouse and his combatants for a whole year. [...] If you read media accounts of the confrontation, you would get the clear impression that it was Rittenhouse who was chasing Rosenbaum, not the other way around.  For anyone reading these accounts, it would seem that the men were minding their own business when Rittenhouse decided on his own to hunt and gun them down.  Nothing could be further from the truth.

It's all about the narrative — facts [notwithstanding].  Jussie Smollett was not attacked by MAGA-hatted white thugs; the media treated his initial story with complete credulity.  Christine Blasey Ford provided no supporting evidence for her allegations against Brett Kavanaugh; the media treated her as a groundbreaking heroine.  The high schoolers of Covington Catholic did not mock a Native American man; the media treated them as evil white supremacists.  Jacob Blake was not wrongfully shot by police; the media treated his shooting as a case of systemic police racism.  No evidence was ever presented that Derek Chauvin killed George Floyd based on race; his case nonetheless became the point of the spear in our "national conversation" about racism.  How many facts will die at the hands of media-crafted narratives?  As many as need to die in order to achieve political utopia for the left.

Retract Every Russian Collusion Story and Fire Everyone Who Wrote Them.  [Scroll down]  But the [Washington] Post should not just unapologetically correct the phony stories on Millian; every single article, column, and video that supports the now-debunked Russian collusion hoax should be retracted with a lengthy explanation.  Tom Hamburger, who was in cahoots with Simpson from the start and met with Simpson and Christopher Steele in September 2016 to accelerate the narrative weeks before the presidential election, should be fired.  Immediately.  So, too, should Helderman.  And Post editors should force the pair to return the Pulitzer Prize they won, along with several New York Times reporters, in 2018 for "deeply sourced, relentlessly reported coverage in the public interest that dramatically furthered the nation's understanding of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and its connections to the Trump campaign, the President-elect's transition team and his eventual administration."  This unfolding scandal is not only about how inaccurately the media covered Sergei Millian or the bogus Steele dossier.  There was no collusion between the Trump presidential campaign and the Russians.  Period.  And everyone knew it at the time.  Tom Hamburger knew it, Rosalind Helderman, everyone at MSNBC, CNN, the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal and more knew it was fabricated garbage peddled by a well-known paid smear merchant who was disguising another paid political operative as a "western intelligence officer."

Trump Dossier Coverage 'One of the Most Egregious Journalistic Errors' in History, Admits Corporate Media.  Axios, one of the leading D.C.-based corporate media outlets, has admitted that reporting surrounding the now infamous Trump-Steele dossier was "one of the most egregious journalistic errors in modern history," in an article slamming news-media colleagues for the years of fake news reporting.  "...[T]he media's response to its own mistakes has so far been tepid," wrote Sara Fischer on Sunday morning, as it becomes increasingly clear to the nation's journalistic class that not only were they willingly duped for years, but that they have made almost no efforts to correct their outright falsehoods.

The Russia hoax was the journalism version of check kiting.  The Russia hoax, as President Trump correctly called it, is turning out to be a legal problem for some and a credibility collapse for journalism. [...] In the real world, the victims of check kiting end up in the courts, trying to get their money.  In the media world, they click the channel off or cancel their subscriptions.  Can anyone read a story based on sources close to the information and take it seriously anymore?  I don't.  I take those stories as seriously as I do those polls based on "adults."  Let's hope Mr. Durham understands how important his task is.  He owes the country an explanation for how something like this could happen.

When Liberal Media Narratives Blow Up.  Today it's Kyle Rittenhouse.  Not long ago it was young Nicholas Sandmann.  And, of course, for four years or so it was the Trump-Russia collusion business.  What do these three episodes have in common?  That would be the fact of a wildly untrue liberal media narrative. [...] So what do we have here?  What we have is a crystal clear pattern of the media substituting liberal bias for the facts of a given story.  The center of the story of the moment could be Kyle Rittenhouse or Nicholas Sandmann or Trump-Russia collusion.  It could be, heaven knows, all manner of other news stories.  But the one constant in each is that the liberals at these liberal media outlets deliberately — say again deliberately — report the facts of a case with a far left bias.  Now the liberal narrative of Kyle Rittenhouse seems to be falling apart in a court of law.  The question is, will the liberal media learn from this?  Will it finally learn that in reporting the news it's the facts, not the political bias of a liberal narrative, that should rule?  Don't bet the ranch.

Joe Biden Calls Satchel Paige "The Great Negro" — Media Immediately Says Biden Did Not Say What You Saw Him Say.  Comrades, the ministry of truth does not want you to misunderstand what Joe Biden is saying in these prepared remarks.  Do not believe your eyes and ears, Joe Biden is not saying:  ..."You know, I've adopted the attitude of the great negro at the time, pitcher in the negro leagues went on to become a great pitcher in the pros, into the, major league baseball after Jackie Robinson, his name was Satchel Paige".  Joe Biden is NOT saying this, according to U.S. media immediately afterward.  [Video clip]

A Deeper Divide.  After the George Floyd death the mainstream media covered BLM in expected flattering terms.  So much so that Main Street believes that in a typical year police kill anywhere from 1,000 to 10,000 unarmed black men.  The real figure last year was eighteen.  The U.S. Crime Victimization Study also reveals a different story:  In a normal year like 2019, among violent crimes involving a white perp and a black victim or a black perp and a white victim, 70 to 90 percent of such incidents are black-on-white crimes.  True statistics aside, American society's generators like universities, media, entertainment, and Big Tech continue to spread the view that oppressors rule the nation and that slavery defines American history.

Turley: The media oddly missed the "crash and burn" of Rittenhouse prosecutors this week.  They didn't miss it at all — national media outlets just tried their best to report around it.  We have covered the errors and outright violations committed by Kenosha prosecutors in the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse, and so our readers are aware of what Jonathan Turley describes as the "crash and burn" of the murder case over the past week.  Most media consumers have instead been fed a narrative of judicial bias and bizarre attempts to inject race into a case where the accused, the alleged victims, and most of the witnesses are all white.

The Leftist Media Lied Through Their Teeth about Kyle Rittenhouse.  One clip after another shows just how many lies the liberal media was willing to concoct in order to pain Kyle Rittenhouse as the bad guy.  Now, that the case has been seen and viewed publicly, most intelligent people are realizing all of the lies the liberal media told, i.e.  "A white supremacist," who was "looking to murder protesters."  Is just that, more lies from a media who makes the story up as they go.

How did we get here?  Can this mess be fixed?  [Scroll down]  Long ago, there was a day, we are told (because none of us was around to witness it), when most people believed what they read in a newspaper.  Gradually, that myth faded.  We learned that journalists weren't always truthful.  Today, a scant 14% trust what the media, press, or journalists have to say.  That's part of the price we pay for undermining truth.  Lying, conniving, and propagandizing journalists get a fair share of the blame.  But few people understood journalism's function even in the good old days.  Journalists do not tell the truth.  They tell what people tell them.  If a reporter or commentator limited his published words to "the truth," he would publish little with certainty apart from the date.  I've yet to meet a journalist, and I've met thousands, capable of ferreting out "the truth" in complex issues.  Some do better than others by compiling an array of evidence and testimony.  But in the end, it's the same story: "so-and-so says so."  It's unavoidable, a hazard of the genre.

Media Reveals Just How Misleading They Can Be When It Comes to Rittenhouse Coverage.  We've written before about how the prosecution seems to have been imploding its own case in the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse.  There was the opening statement where the prosecutor, Thomas Binger, claimed that Rittenhouse was chasing Joseph Rosenbaum rather than the truth that it was the other way around. [...] Today was perhaps the capper of them all that completely blew up the case.  The defense was questioning Gaige Grosskreutz — the third man Rittenhouse shot.  Grosskreutz admitted that he advanced on Rittenhouse and pointed the gun at him and it was only after that, that Rittenhouse shot him. [...] We see how media is portraying the trial today so we can see just how misleading it is because we know what happened at the trial.  We can't always see all the facts in a story that the media reports on in the way we did here.  Yet, this is how they are casting the trial?  Are they kidding?  And they wonder why Americans no longer trust them?  This is a perfect example of why.

3 points about the news media.  [Thread reader]  The vast majority of disinformation, propaganda and lies that flooded the country over the last 5 years did not come from MAGA boomers on Facebook or 4Chan teenagers but the largest and most influential liberal corporate media outlets.  These are not cases where media outlets erred.  They deliberately lied.  The way to know that is they refuse to acknowledge evidence proving they lied.

Never Trumpers and Black Lives Matter Have the Same Backer.  The press releases went out on schedule and the media rewrote them into news stories.  A group of "principled" Republicans was going to fundraise to support Democrat congressmen.  The stories rolled out on schedule from different media outlets while appearing nearly identical.  And the real story, as usual, was not what was on the page, but what had been deliberately left out.  Reuters described the Renew America Movement as a group of Never Trump Republicans "whose leadership includes former Republican Governors Christine Todd Whitman of New Jersey and Bill Weld of Massachusetts."  Hardly a single story mentioned the actual leaders.  The Renew America Movement was co-founded by Evan McMullin and his running mate Mindy Finn.  Its national political director, Joel Searby, who is quoted in the media's writeups, was the chief strategist for the McMullin campaign.  Donations to RAM go through Stand Up Republic, which is the anti-Trump group that McMullin and Finn originally set up.  The press release for the new pro-Democrat campaign even came from Stand Up Republic.  The media actually had to work not to mention McMullin or Stand Up Republic in its stories about the RAM campaign.  And the media did a fine job of lying by omission to the public in order to elect Democrats.

Our mostly complicit, compliant, sycophant press has no concern about facts, only Democrat power.  What happened to Donald Trump in 2016 and beyond dwarfed Watergate.  Most of the media not only didn't care about the corruption of the Democrats, but were also major participants in seeking to destroy a candidate, and later president, they didn't like.  Special counsel John Durham has started to hit paydirt with three arrests so far, the tip of the iceberg, and the story is essentially buried because the media don't care, and they don't want the public to know the truth.  If the public learns the truth, they will see how dishonest, corrupt, and dangerous the media are.  They will set out to destroy anyone they don't want in elective office.  The truth and evidence are never necessary when they are campaigning for Democrats.

Democrats Traipsing Through Strawberry Fields.  Start with critical race theory, one of the major issues in school board elections nationwide and in the Virginia gubernatorial race.  Former Bush Republican, now a Trump-hating liberal Democrat, MSNBC's Nicolle Wallace declared that critical race theory "isn't real."  Her strawberry fields analysis of a Republican sweep in Virginia, the GOP winning the governor, lieutenant governor, and attorney general positions was, "So, I think that the real ominous thing, is that critical race theory, which isn't real, turned the suburbs 15 points to the Trump-insurrection-endorsed Republican."  Maybe in the cocooned studios of MSNBC, critical race theory is some QAnon or white supremacist conspiracy theory, but to voters it was quite real, and concerning.  If critical race theory is not real, someone should tell Amazon as they offer numerous books on the subject, in education and mathematics, how to teach it in school and how to respond to "microaggressions," meaning any viewpoint that challenges the CRT agenda.  Defeated gubernatorial candidate Terry McAuliffe told fellow Democrat Chuck Todd shortly before the election that critical race theory has "never been taught" in the state's public schools and that the fight to ban the theory from school curricula is a "racist dog whistle."  McAuliffe also claimed that eventual gubernatorial victor Glenn Youngkin "wants to ban critical race theory."  Chuck Todd missed the obvious follow up question of why something that doesn't exist or isn't taught would need to be banned?

7 Insane Things I Just Learned About How U.S. Elections Are 'Rigged'.  [#6] It's No Longer Media Bias, It's Media Lies:  As my opening to this essay explains, I'm aware media bias has been transcended by outright propaganda.  In her book, however, Mollie [Hemingway] makes an excellent point about this after detailing other cases proving this shift.  She makes it in relation to what I'd call a relatively minor offense — The New York Times publishing a Trump-smearing piece from an anonymous author it described as a "senior administration official," meaning "someone in the upper echelon of an administration."  Of course, it turned out this person wasn't any such thing.  He was just a mid-level bureaucrat.

McAuliffe buys 'fake news' ads in effort to sway voters, Fox News investigation finds.  Former Gov. Terry McAuliffe has spent nearly $100,000 advertising "fake news" websites on Facebook during the Virginia gubernatorial campaign, Fox News can reveal.  The Democrat's advertisements, which have been viewed up to 3.5 million times so far, are hidden on a Facebook page with a similar name to a local news website.  The ads link to third-party websites that ostensibly publish local news, but exist to promote Democratic candidates.  The websites have been widely described as disinformation and "partisan propaganda."

Axios Blames American Consumers, Not Bad Policy for Labor Shortages.  Blame the American consumer!  That's the approach liberal outlet Axios used to explain away the atrocious labor shortages affecting the U.S. economy, and not President Joe Biden's economic policies.  Axios published a snobbish piece headlined, "Unruly customers threaten economic recovery."  The outlet's asinine argument was that "increasingly violent and combative customers," angry about "long wait times and mask mandates," were causing workers to quit, hamstringing a recovery that hinges in part on employees "returning to work."  But unlike Axios, The Wall Street Journal editorial board didn't hesitate to pin the labor shortage blame on the proper culprit:  "Bidenomics."  The Journal suggested two specific sources for what has been causing the worker shortage.  The sources it mentioned were: "government and employer vaccine mandates that set ultimatums for workers" and Democrats making "quitting an easier economic option" through a litany of federal unemployment benefits.

Age-Adjusted Mortality Is at 2004 Levels.  Yet They Tell Us Covid Is Worse Than the 1918 Flu..  Last week, the media again tried to ratchet up the public's fear over covid-19 by labeling it more deadly than the 1918 flu epidemic.  "COVID-19 Is Now the Deadliest Disease in U.S. History," reads one headline from an NBC TV affiliate.  Considering the realities of cancer and heart disease, that headline is absurdly false.  Perhaps the author meant "communicable disease."  A TIME headline was at least arguably factual, declaring, "COVID-19 Is Now the Deadliest Pandemic in American History."  But even the TIME headline is only arguably true if stripped of all context.  If we actually look at disease mortality proportionally to the population, the 1918 epidemic was far worse than covid.  Considering that the US population in 1918 was one-third its current size, we find that deaths per million from the flu epidemic totaled about sixty-five hundred per million.  Covid, by comparison currently comes in — in the official numbers — around twenty-two hundred per million.  But this is all part of a larger pattern — one well embraced by the media — of presenting information with as little context as possible.

Gallup: Trust In The Media Sinks to 36 Percent, Second Lowest Ever.  Can the mistrust of the media get much greater?  Gallup pollsters reported on Thursday [10/7/2021] that American trust in the media "to report the news fully, accurately and fairly has edged down four percentage points since last year to 36 percent, making this year's reading the second lowest in Gallup's trend."  Overall, just seven percent of U.S. adults say they have "a great deal" and 29 percent "a fair amount" of trust and confidence in newspapers, television and radio news reporting — which, combined, is four points above the 32 percent record low in 2016, during the Donald Trump vs.  Hillary Clinton battle.  More than half of respondents sound fed up:  29 percent of the public currently registers "not very much" trust and 34 percent say they have "none at all."

What the press is leaving out about the Arizona election audit.  The ethical corruption of our national new media has extended to a degree that once would have seemed unimaginable.  We were exposed to yet another remarkable example with the reporting on the long-awaited audit of the 2020 presidential election results in Arizona. [...] While the audit did find that a hand-recount of all of the original ballots did widen Joe Biden's margin by several hundred votes, the press deliberately and steadfastly ignored and left unreported the most critical results of the draft audit.  Included among those original ballots, the most comprehensive election audit ever conducted established the following:
  •   More than 23,000 mail-in votes were cast under voter IDs from people who should not have received their ballots by mail because they had moved.
  •   More than 10,000 voters cast ballots in more than one county.
  •   More than 9,000 mail-in ballots were returned and counted than had been mailed out of registered voters.
  •   Thousands of official results did not match those who voted, and thousands more were cast in-person in the name of those who had moved out of state.
  •   Logs and data files related to the election had been deliberately erased from the Election Management System (EMS) server, in violation of the law.
  •   Thousands of original ballots were duplicated more than once.
  •   Auditors were never provided with the required chain-of-custody documentation for the ballots, causing increased ambiguity regarding the accuracy of the election results.
  •   None of the various systems related to the election had numbers that would balance and agree with one another.
  •   Maricopa County officials actively interfered with the audit, withheld subpoena items, and refused to answer questions that are normally standard in such audits.

Outlets That Poured Gas on Phony Border Patrol Story Forced to Correct Their Fake News.  Mainstream media outlets are, with egg on their face, issuing clarifications and corrections to their stories that falsely smeared Border Patrol agents who were defending America's southern border for actions they didn't take using equipment they don't have.  The timing makes sense as attention strays again from the U.S.-Mexico border following an influx of some 15,000 illegal immigrants — many of them Haitians who'd previously fled to South America — who set up a makeshift "Bidenville" under the International Bridge in Del Rio, Texas.  Despite the half-hearted mea culpas, their mission to distract from the border crisis by creating a new boogeyman has already done its damage.  The El Paso Times, one of the original propagators of the phony story, issued a meek "clarification," rather than a correction or retraction which would have been more suited to the literal fake news that launched a national firestorm and triggered condemnation from the White House that caused an investigation by the Department of Homeland Security.

The Activist Media Has Done an Exemplary Job of Deceiving the American People on COVID-19.  When it comes to the COVID-19 pandemic, the activist media has performed masterfully. [...] Ever since it became apparent that the COVID-19 outbreak would be a serious issue, the Democrats and their close friends and allies in the activist media have been trying to convince us that we're all gonna die slow, painful deaths after being infected.  The press has been on a full-on crusade to terrify the American people into abiding by lockdown orders and mask mandates.  They used fear to make us more amenable to government encroaching on our lives. [...] Since the government wants to push mandatory vaccines and use the pandemic as an excuse to impose intrusive measures to control the populace, the activist media seeks to persuade the public that this is all for their own good.  It launched a whole persuasion campaign specifically designed to confuse and terrify people into complying with the government.

Look past the hand-waving, and you'll see a wide open Mexican border.  Soon after Bill Melugin of Fox News began beaming drone footage of the many thousands of Haitians gathered under the bridge in Del Rio, Texas, Biden's open borders zealot in charge of DHS, Alejandro Mayorkas, ordered two nearby border checkpoints abandoned.  The reason given was to redirect those personnel to help process the Haitians.  The media reported that those checkpoints had been "closed," leading the viewer to believe that traffic had been rerouted.  But that was not the case.  The fifty thousand vehicles those checkpoints inspect during an average week continued to move through, only now no one was checking them for drugs or trafficked humans.  This happened while Mayorkas was giving a news conference under the Del Rio bridge, insisting that the U.S. border was definitely "not open."  In fact, the border in the Del Rio sector was wide open.

Russiagate, More Like Watergate.  CNN Chief Media Reporter Brian Stelter hopped on the set of Reliable Sources last weekend, and offered his take on Special Counsel John Durham's recent indictment of former Perkins Coie attorney Michael Sussmann, calling Durham's probe a "total bust."  This was in the context of accusing other networks like Fox and OAN of a pattern of "lie, rinse, repeat." [...] A long list of press figures — from Stelter's own CNN colleague and shameless intelligence community spokesclown Natasha Bertrand, to reporters from The New Yorker, Time, MSNBC, Fortune, the Financial Times, and especially Slate and The Atlantic — were witting or unwitting pawns in a scheme to sell the public on a transparently moronic hoax, i.e. that Donald Trump's campaign was communicating mysterious digital treason to Russia's Alfa Bank via a secret computer server.  The story sounded absurd from the start, and was instantly challenged by experts.

What the New CDC Report on Unvaccinated Left Out.  A newly published CDC study prompted the MSM to run headlines like "New study finds unvaccinated are 11 times more likely to die from Covid, CDC says," "Unvaccinated people were 11 times more likely to die of covid-19, CDC report finds," and "Unvaccinated People Are 11 Times More Likely To Die Of COVID-19, New Research Finds."  It surely looks scary if you read only those headlines.  I was curious about what the report actually says, and doesn't say.  Below is what I found.  [#1] The purpose of the report is for propaganda:  The report admits in its Discussion section that "the data assessed from 13 jurisdictions accounted for 25% of the U.S. population, and therefore might not be generalizable."  But it still suggests that "[t]he data might be helpful in communicating the real-time impact of vaccines (e.g., persons not fully vaccinated having >10 times higher COVID-19 mortality risk) and guiding prevention strategies, such as vaccination and nonpharmacologic interventions."  No wonder the MSM outlets quickly spread this message around.

Sensational headline alert:  There has been ONE CASE of measles reported.  This is hardly worth reporting.
Army base hit with highly contagious disease as thousands of Afghan refugees flood into America.  A case of measles has been identified at Fort McCoy Army Base in Wisconsin as thousands of Afghan refugees are housed there temporarily while they await resettlement in the United States.  Fox News was able to view an internal government email on Sunday [9/5/2021] that confirms a case of measles at Fort McCoy.  "All those who had been in contact with the infected person at base have been isolated, and post-exposure prophylaxis and inoculations are in process," the email stated.

The Masked Ball of Cowardice.  What's transpired since has been a predictable spiral into the abyss, aided and abetted at virtually every stage by a media apparatus that has perpetuated the fraudulent lockdown narrative.  The Chinese government has financial stakes in almost every top media outlet and friends in corporations, universities, and governments.  Preexisting financial relationships with China led institutions to trust information from China, endorse the CCP's narrative, and ultimately advocate for the global adoption of the CCP's policies.  Owing to this combination of naivete, groupthink, and outright corruption, scientists and journalists have been incorporating information from China into their work as true, when in fact nearly every bit of information that has come from China with regard to the virus has been a lie.

Tamarius Davis
Shooter opened fire on Miami Beach tourist, danced over body: witness.  A Georgia man "randomly" shot and killed a tourist in a Miami Beach restaurant and danced over his body as the man tried to protect his 1-year-old baby from the gunman, reports said.  Tamarius Blair Davis, 22, of Norcross, Georgia, was allegedly high on psychedelic mushrooms when he opened fire on 21-year-old Dustin Wakefield at close range before he danced over his body in view of horrified onlookers dining outdoors at La Cerveceria de Barrio on Miami Beach's famous Ocean Drive on Tuesday night [8/24/2021], witnesses and police said.  "After the shooting, he was dancing on top of the guy," a witness, who didn't want to be identified, told CBS Miami.

The Editor says...
Why do reporters think blacks always shoot "randomly" selected white people?  The selections are not random.


How Data Manipulation Is Used to Support the Desired Narratives.  Who uses data manipulation?  Governments, businesses (individual or entire industries as we constantly see in martial arts/self-defense), the media, and social organizations with an agenda.  These groups or organizations utilize information to create a narrative on a topic for a specific reason, most often for their own benefit.  The data itself could be entirely legitimate and authentic (though it may not be).  It's how it's spun that's important, and most people rarely dig deeper [...] Remember, data manipulation has multiple benefits, and it's usually very subtle yet sudden.  If it fits a person's narrative, they will often support it.  Even if it's different from the original source manipulating the data in the first place.

Covid Disinformation:  Post Reporter Tries to Make Mask Fanatics Seem Heroic.  Sydney Page, in an "objective" news piece, amplifies the opinion of a mother, Wendy, whose extreme opinions lack scientific evidence and logic.  Page does her best to make Wendy's opinion seem common when in reality it is an extreme position in response to a mask policy with which many agree.  The author's implicit assumptions and tacit agreement with the view she reports destroys her credibility. [...] First, Page does not mention that Tennessee Holler is a far-left website that promotes its own agenda by amplifying voices in favor of universal mask mandates and COVID vaccinations.  This is missing context that would allow the reader to understand that this is another issue campaign for a left-wing pressure group.  Second, to say that the mother's take has gone "viral" is Page's opinion stated as fact, though unsupported by evidence.  To go "viral" takes a bit more than 30,000 likes on a social media site.  You can buy 30,000 likes on Twitter right now for about $360 for context.

Memphis Media Reports 16 Year Old Dies Of COVID, Waits Until End Of Report To Inform He Was Fully Vaccinated.  This is FAKE news at its most dangerous.  Memphis media has reported this week that a 16-year-old football player at Westwood High School died from COVID-19 and pneumonia over the weekend.  Sunday, the principal at Westwood High sent out an automated message to students and parents about the death of Azorean Tatum but did not say how he died.  SCS has not released any details.  Quintina Bucker said her son Azorean Tatum, who went by the name Zo, collapsed at school on Aug. 13 and was taken to Baptist Children's Hospital, where he was diagnosed with COVID.  Buckner admitted her son, who had asthma, [and] was vaccinated.  [Video clip]

Untruths and consequences.  To any sane person, it appears our elites and their media sycophants are engaging in an unprecedented preposterous statement tournament.  They must get up every day, snicker once or twice, and try to think of the most ridiculous, least verifiable piece of ludicrous prevarication they can attempt to pass off as truth.  And why shouldn't they?  A significant percentage of Americans seem willing to believe anything at all.  So, President Biden says there are no Americans trapped in Kabul.  Alright, now tell us the one about the three bears.  His Press Secretary, Jen Psaki, says we need to get the military out of Afghanistan first, so we don't risk anyone getting hurt.  Yes, forget about the thousands of American civilians trapped in Kabul.  Ignore the pictures of mothers throwing their babies over fences.  Um, Jen, we send our troops to places specifically to confront danger and instability... and often to fight the bad guys.  That's why, unlike civilians, they are armed to the teeth and wear body armor.  That's why they have attack helicopters, A-10 Warthogs, missiles, rocket launchers, grenades, and submachine guns.  Or used to, before the Biden administration decided to donate them to the Taliban.

'Case': Another semantic Trojan Horse.  In our new world of pandemic panic porn, it is important to remember that the word "case" is not a term of art.  It is not a medical term or a legal term.  It is just another word with a broad meaning that has been commandeered by people who want to control you.  This seemingly innocuous word is being used as a blunt instrument to stampede you into doing what the globalist elites want you to do.  It is widely used when the media, Big Tech, and government experts (the "infomob") lie by omission.  When you hear that there are x "new cases" in any context, this should immediately prompt you to ask questions about the number:
  •   Are these just positive COVID tests?
  •   Are these hospitalized people?
  •   Are these people who are not sick at all?
  •   Are these re-testings of the same people who have to be tested daily to keep their jobs?
  •   Are these people with other medical conditions?
The infomob wants you to envision these "cases" as hospitalized people on respirators, gasping for breath.  What if most of these are just positive tests?  If so, were these done with the PCR test?  The fact is, the PCR test is so highly parameterizable that you can set it to find whatever you want.  This is one of the reasons the CDC has quit using it.

Phony Doctor Starts To Laugh While Pretending To Cry About COVID Live During Newscast.  A good crisis actor is hard to find these days.  That is what CBS found out during the evening news with Norah O'Donnell.  This supposed doctor who goes by the name of Mia Meyers starts out talking about how people need to take the Delta variant seriously because of its transmissibility.  She then starts into something about 'our children before launching into her crocodile tear routine, which morphs into full-blown laughter.  Fake news strikes out again!  [Video clip]

Why Don't They Believe Us?  Imagine your confusion as the same people who spent three months telling you not only that masks don't work, but that there are several reasons you shouldn't wear or purchase them, suddenly introduce mask mandates.  We're "following the science," they tell you.  This seems to make little sense, but a pandemic is no time for questions. [...] The same people who told you Brexit would never happen, that Trump would never win, that when he did win it was because of Russian collusion but also because of racism, that you must follow lockdowns while they don't, that masks don't work, that masks do work, that social justice protests during pandemic lockdowns are a form of "health intervention," that ransacking African American communities in the name of fighting racism is a "mostly peaceful" form of protest, that poor and underserved children locked out of shuttered schools are "still learning," that Jussie Smollett was a victim of a hate crime, that men are toxic, that there is an infinite number of genders, that COVID couldn't have come from a lab until maybe it did, that closing borders is racist until maybe it isn't, that you shouldn't take Trump's vaccine, that you must take the vaccine developed during the Trump administration, that Andrew Cuomo is a great leader, that Andrew Cuomo is a granny killer, that the number of COVID deaths is one thing and then another ... are the same people telling you now that the vaccine is safe, that you must take it, and that if you don't, you will be a second-class citizen.  Understand vaccine hesitancy now?

Conservatives are Obsessed With My Pillow Vote Fraud Conference, According to Obsessed News Networks.  Funny how we only hear about dangerous threats from those networks who declare them dangerous.  Let's take a look over a list of items we are told are absolutes in our political landscape these days:
  •   Conservatives the country over are committed to The Big Lie.
  •   Donald Trump is blindly followed by every Republican.
  •   Qanon feeds the mindset of anybody who is right-of-center.
These truths are well known and perpetually broadcast, but there is a core foundational reality behind these maxims.  The subjects in each of these entries is followed more intently and the information is disseminated to the populace with far more energy by the mainstream press industry.  It is interesting that while I am supposedly obsessed with President Trump I learn about his opinions and activities mostly through journalists.  While I get accused of fostering the push of denying the 2020 election results I only hear instructions on the matter via CNN and MSNBC, and as someone allegedly transfixed by Qanon's dictates I only ever hear about the directives from this nebulous source from clips of Brian Stelter and Chris Hayes.

Are These Stories Real?  Or Are the Media Trying to Overcome 'Vaccine Hesitancy' by Using Fear Porn?  [Scroll down beyond the highly dubious anecdote.]  On the whole, I'd take my chances on my own rather than to submit to the tender mercies of someone who obviously holds me in contempt.  I have some questions about the entire story.  For instance, according to the CDC, there has not been a single COVID-related death in Alabama under 40 in over a month.  There have only been 110 such deaths in Alabama since the pandemic started.  There is no public data, so far as I can find, that gives the number of intubated patients, the number of patients in the ICU by age, etc., since the vaccine became available.  The absence of empirical data to back up undocumented anecdotes doesn't give me great confidence in the story.  And the source is a Facebook post.

Mollie Hemingway:  Partisan Hearings Taking Jan. 6 Riot Out Of Context Are A "Joke".  Mollie Hemingway made the case Sunday [8/1/2021] on FNC's "MediaBuzz" that the January 6 Capitol riot committee hearings are being held by partisan Democrats who are taking events out of the wider context of escalating political violence in 2020.  ["]If you want to talk about consistency, you have to deal with the fact that we have a political party that embraced a movement to defund the police for an entire year and now we're pretending that they care so much about the police. [...] The defund the police movement, which the media and other Democratic partisans strongly celebrated, which was supported across the country by Democratic politicians, was something we saw in the past year.["]

Here is an example of tabloid sensationalism.
Three Americans create enough carbon emissions to kill one person, study finds.  The lifestyles of around three average Americans will create enough planet-heating emissions to kill one person, and the emissions from a single coal-fired power plant are likely to result in more than 900 deaths, according to the first analysis to calculate the mortal cost of carbon emissions.  The new research builds upon what is known as the "social cost of carbon", a monetary figure placed upon the damage caused by each ton of carbon dioxide emissions, by assigning an expected death toll from the emissions that cause the climate crisis.  The analysis draws upon several public health studies to conclude that for every 4,434 metric tons of CO2 pumped into the atmosphere beyond the 2020 rate of emissions, one person globally will die prematurely from the increased temperature.  This additional CO2 is equivalent to the current lifetime emissions of 3.5 Americans.

The Editor says...
Carbon dioxide is not carbon, nor is it a lethal pollutant, in the quantities seen in ordinary air.  With the exception of coal mine accidents, volcanic eruptions, or extremely rare events like this one, nobody dies from inhaling carbon dioxide.  You will likely never see a death certificate that lists inhalation of second-hand CO2 as the cause of death.  Carbon monoxide is poisonous, but carbon monoxide is not carbon dioxide.  Follow the science!

Unrestricted Mass Border Invasion Continues.  The head for the Rio Grand Valley (RGV) sector of the U.S. Border Patrol, Brian Hastings, sent an alarming tweet message earlier today [7/25/2021].  According to Hastings:  "It's the hottest part of the summer and apprehensions are skyrocketing!  USBP Apprehensions surpassed the 1-million milestone in June.  NOW, this week alone, #RGV has apprehended more than 20K illegally present migrants."  One million illegal aliens walk into the country while Joe Biden claims to be concerned about the spread of COVID-19?

The Editor says...
Another million illegal aliens walked into the country, yet the total number of illegal aliens (reported by the news media) remains a constant 11 million.  It never increases.

The Antifa/FBI Coalition.  Over two dozen people were killed during the Antifa and BLM protests in 2020.  It is routinely reported that "five people died as a result" of the Jan. 6 disturbance.  This is a totally accurate statement, however, it is still misleading.  Only one of the deceased died as a result of violence.  She was actually murdered by a government official.  Relating these deaths allows the media to routinely describe Jan. 6 as a "deadly insurrection" as opposed to the "mostly peaceful" protests by Antifa and BLM.

A reporter lies about Trump's statement regarding vaccines.  My mantra for some time now has been that there was nothing "abnormal" about Trump's presidency.  Since Trump has left the White House, it's become patently clear that the abnormality during the Trump years came entirely from the Democrats and their media operatives, with support from the Vichy Republicans. [...] But the Trump haters were relentless and, as if to prove that the sickness was all theirs, on Sunday [7/18/2021] one of them instantly and proudly perverted Trump's words to claim that he was anti-vaccine.  Remember, please, that Trump was the one who pushed aside regulations and freed up money so that there was a vaccine within less than a year of COVID's appearance in America.  It was also Trump who began the vaccine program with assistance from the military, which is very good at processing vast numbers of people.  Since he left the White House, Trump has watched the Biden administration make a complete hash of the program.

The contempt and loss of trust people harbor for the corporate media is completely justified and well-earned.  [Thread reader]  The part of the media that feigns anger at misinformation is uncritically promoting a story today by Luke Harding that Russia was blackmailing Trump — the same Harding who has published many false stories, championed the Steele Dossier and claimed Trump was long a Russian agent.  It was Harding who published was one of the most sensationalized stories of the Trump era: that Manafort repeatedly met Assange in the Ecuadorian Embassy.  It was utterly fabricated.  Everyone knows it's [false], never happened.  Yet the Guardian has never corrected or retracted it[.]  Now suddenly, Harding claims he obtained leaked, highly sensitive Kremlin documents that just so happen to prove all the lies he's been peddling for years, that not even Mueller's huge team found.  Because it advances liberals' interests, journalists are uncritically spreading it.

The Democrats' Topsy-Turvy Spin Machine.  Everything appears to be topsy-turvy: the chairman of the joint chiefs and the chairman of the American Federation of Teachers, Randi Weingarten, made almost identical statements about critical race theory.  The Democrats now claim the Republicans are the ones who wished to defund the police, and now they suddenly have discovered the virtue of voter identification, which, up until yesterday, they had been shrieking from the roof-tops was tantamount to the restoration of slavery.  Apparently, it's not Jim Crow after all.  The media are so absurdly partisan they will try to allow the Democrats a free pass across the barricades on those issues.  But the accumulating disasters for the Biden Administration will not be entirely absorbed by the (agonizingly slow) return to work of Americans after COVID and the miracle of the Warp Speed vaccine development, (for which Trump must receive no credit). The media can't cover for this "Gong Show" administration indefinitely, but I must admit they have lasted longer than I expected, given their invertebrate response to almost everything else.

MSNBC Agrees With Radical Race-Baiter:  GOP Wants 'American Apartheid'.  In [the] wake of President Biden huddling, on Thursday [7/8/2021], with radical left-wing activists who pretend to be "civil rights leaders," MSNBC on Friday [7/9/2021] touted National Urban League President Marc Morial coming out after that meeting and hurling the vile accusation that Republican-sponsored voting reforms and the U.S. Supreme Court were conspiring to create "American apartheid."  Rather than fact-check such a horrendous lie, the partisan cable channel endorsed the disgusting rhetoric instead.  "Civil rights leaders gathering with President Biden....We know they want more action on federal voting rights," anchor Chris Jansing announced while filling in for Stephanie Ruhle in the 9:00 a.m. ET hour.  She eagerly pointed out that "all of this is happening after the Supreme Court upheld Arizona voting restrictions and the president of the Urban League, Marc Morial, talked about that after the meeting at the White House."

Democrats Can't Stem the Flow of Revelations No Matter How Hard They Try.  Virtually every legacy media story about the 2020 election includes the phrase "baseless claims of voter fraud" in disparaging President Trump and anyone else who dares to point out the need for full forensic audits to sort out the mountain of election irregularities that continue to be uncovered.  It reminds me of the endless repetition of the word "gravitas" during the 2000 presidential campaign, as the Democrat-media agitprop worked overtime to disparage George W. Bush.  Check out the DuckDuckGo search results for "baseless claims of voter fraud" below.  The leftwing and legacy media are good at repeating Democrat narratives; after all, most of them are Democrats (or at least vote Democrat).

Biden Does Not Need A Domestic "Terrorism" Agenda Unless He Is About To Violate American Rights.  One of Joe Biden's first actions upon entering the White House was to initiate a 100 day review of the government's domestic terrorism policies, and I think this says a lot about what path his presidency is bound to follow.  Yes, the media continually argues that the Capitol protest on Jan 6th was a vast conspiracy on the part of conservatives to "overthrow" the democratic process and commit insurrection.  In fact, all it really amounted to was a large protest which was less violent than the majority of Black Lives Matter protests across the nation over the past year.  The media also incessantly mentions the five deaths that occurred on the day of the protest while continuing to ignore the fact that NOT ONE of those deaths has been attributed to the direct actions of protesters, and at least three of the deaths were due to natural causes.  Why does the mainstream media keep lying by omission?  Because they have to keep the narrative alive that the capitol protest is a sign of some underlying conservative "evil" that must be contained or destroyed.  We don't really give them much to work with, so they have to create reasons out of thin air to convince people to hate us.

"Trigger" is being canceled because it triggers.  [Scroll down]  The media often refer to groups they like as "communities."  As in the "gay community" and the "black community" and alphabet groups such as "LGBTQ community."  They could instead simply refer to "gays" and "blacks" and "LGBTQs" but they gratuitously add the word "community" because they like the nice connotation.  As an aside, the media's lumping of the members of this or that group together as a "community" suggests that the members all think the same.  But to the media, that's OK, so long as the sameness in their thinking is media-approved.  Meaning they are all thinking like the media thinks — like leftists.  As you learned a few paragraphs ago, diversity in viewpoints is bad.  And so the media will tell you that the "gay community" hates Republicans (hate is now OK, so long as it's directed at Republicans, because Republicans are hateful) as if gay Republicans don't exist.  Here's my bigger, trigger point.  Notice that they never use "community" in connection with groups they dislike, some of which are truly and consciously communal.  They never mention the "Christian community" or even the "church-going community."  And you'll never hear them mention the "gun-owner community" or the "hunter community" or the "gay Republican community."  Nope, the word "community" carries good connotations which the media reserves for groups it deems good.

You've got to be kidding:  WaPo lavishes credit on Biden for recovering economy.  This post would be more appropriate in the Babylon Bee as satire, as journalists and the Biden administration collude to rewrite history to give Biden the credit for the economic recovery that was well underway because of Trump and red states before Biden took office.  Even though the vaccines were developed so fast because of Trump and one million shots were being given each day prior to Biden taking office, the Democrat talking points regurgitated by most of the media say there was not a distribution plan prior to Biden taking office.  It is pretty [...] amazing that one million doses were already being given and tens of millions more were in the pipeline when supposedly the Trump administration had no plan.

Subterranean Homesick Blues 2021.  Some guy using the handle Cultural Husbandry had a string of tweets about the media's string of lies.  [For example,]
    Epstein committed suicide
    McAfee committed suicide
    Biden won the election
    COVID came from a wet market
    Conservatives are all terrorists
    Ivermectin doesn't work
    HCQ doesn't work
    Biden doesn't have dementia
    The jab isn't making anyone ill
    Fauci was consistent
    Masks work
    Cuomo didn't kill old people
    Dominion systems were secure
    Hunter Biden is an artist
    Trump colluded with Russia
    Jan 06 was an insurrection
    Transwomen are real women
    BLM is mostly peaceful   [...]
We have got to win the White House back.  And this time, fire every political appointee on Inauguration Day, and ditch everybody above a one-star general or admiral.  And then shrink the central government — including the Milley-ized Military — to the point where a presidential election is less important than a soccer game.  And readers know how little I care about soccer.  If covid 19 taught us anything, it is that the government is too big, too powerful, and too stupid to protect America.

Controlling the World Is Easy.  [Scroll down]  Whenever you heard raw numbers of cases, hospitalizations, or deaths it was because those numbers were bad.  When they weren't so bad, you started hearing percentages.  Why?  Because certain ways of presenting information can make it seem better or worse than it really is. [...] Going from 10,000 deaths per day to 20,000 deaths per day is a 100 percent increase in the number of deaths.  So is going from 1 death per day to 2 deaths per day.  If you want to scare [...] people in the hope that they continue watching your news program, you headline the story with, "There has been a stunning, 100 percent increase in the number of COVID deaths in just 24 hours."  You're not lying, it's an accurate statement.  It's just presented in an absolutely fraudulent way to manipulate the audience.  That's what so much of what the left does has become.

Disclosure: The Four "Swedes" in Custody For Gang Rape Are Somali Citizens.  Ostentatious headlines in Aftonbladet, Expressen and other media declared that "six Swedes", later "eight Swedes" had been arrested for a rough gang rape on a Finland ferry.  Nya Tider is now the first newspaper to reveal that not even the white lie that the arrested Somalis are "Swedish citizens" is right — all the detainees are Somali citizens, and of all the suspects only one has a Swedish citizenship.

Fox News's Chris Wallace accuses Republicans of being the party that is defunding the police.  "Fox News Sunday" host Chris Wallace pushed Republican Study Committee Chair Rep. Jim Banks on the Democratic issue of defunding police departments, suggesting that the Indiana lawmaker's party was actually responsible for cutting funds to law enforcement.  During a segment on rising crime in U.S. cities, Banks appeared after former Rep. Cedric Richmond (D-La.), now a senior adviser to President Joe Biden, who blamed Republicans for "defunding" police by failing to support what amounted to a $350 billion bailout for poorly-run blue cities that suffered additional economic distress during the COVID-19 pandemic due to extensive, prolonged shutdowns.

The Not-So-Great American Pastime.  [Scroll down]  Perhaps the easiest example of pretending is CNN.  It pretends to be a news organization, a reliable source, journalistic in its approach.  Its sillier sister, MSNBC, at least affords viewers some respect by delivering its preposterous daily scripts via personalities so cartoonish in visage, voice and delivery that one cottons on rather quickly to the schtick — propagandizing, after all, differs from pretending.  Both networks amount to 24/7 televangelism for leftist doctrine, but CNN folk are obvious hypocrites, while MSNBC's on-air personalities seem to be actually insane.  The executives at each of these cultural ministries are culpable of Felony Pretending, while their audiences are essentially accomplices after the fact.

Rep. Nunes:  Republicans Shouldn't Talk to Mainstream Media.  Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) claimed that 95 percent of media are the propaganda arm of the Democratic Party and urged Republicans to stop talking to them or going on TV with them.  "I still — for the life of me — can't understand why Republicans talk to 95 percent of the media, which is fake news," Nunes told Alex Marlow [...] on Wednesday [6/16/2021].  "But look, fake news isn't the proper term.  It's the propaganda arm of the Democrat Socialist Party.  That's what it is," Nunes said.  Former President Donald Trump has repeatedly called mainstream media "fake news."  "So it's no different than the Chinese Communist Party — it's the propaganda they put out.  [It's] no different than what the Soviet Union did with the old Pravda media.  And it's, quite frankly, no different than how Putin controls the media today, where 95 percent of his media in Russia is propaganda for the Putin regime," Nunes continued.

Former Trump Official Slices Fauci Apart Over Hydroxychloroquine Fiasco.  Donald Trump scored a major win over the liberal media. [...] Hydroxychloroquine has finally been proven as an effective treatment for COVID.  Russian collusion was a hoax.  The Russian bounty story in Afghanistan was another whopper.  Lafayette Square was not cleared for a photo op.  And Hunter Biden's laptop is real.  The hydroxychloroquine one is significant since it was weaponized heavily against the Trump administration.  The president was trying to save lives and all the media did was attack him.  It's why they're the opposition press.  And Dr. Anthony Fauci's refusal to endorse the treatment caused thousands of unnecessary deaths.  That's the allegation that Peter Navarro, Trump's director for now-defunct Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy, said he had around 60 million tablets of this stuff that could have been used to treat some 5-6 million patients.  Fauci refused to budge.

My Top 10 media lies.  No. 1 is the oldest and biggest:  Trump colluded with Russia to win in 2016 and might be a Russian agent.  That scam involved crooked FBI agents and led to the appointment of Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who took two years to conclude there was no evidence to back the charge. [...] Remember Lie No. 2, the "Muslim ban" that wasn't?  Or No. 3, the mantra that the 2017 tax cuts were only for the "rich" despite studies showing 80 percent of the population benefitted?  How about the "kids in cages" firestorm, complete with gripping photographs of migrant children in metal containers?  That was Lie No. 4 and the hottest story going, with Democrats such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez rushing to the border with photogenic outrage.  They vanished when it was revealed the Obama-Biden administration built the cages and the heart-wrenching photos were from 2014.  Apologies, corrections and retractions came in bunches, right?  You must be kidding.  Big media and big tech are too big to admit error.

The State of Black America.  Listening to all the rhetoric in the popular media, you would think America is the most unfair, racist nation in the world.  You would think that black Americans are uniformly living in oppression and poverty, with no hope for the future, save the federal government arriving on the scene to their rescue.  Sorry, liberals, to trouble you with facts.  But indeed there are facts.  And the facts tell a far different story than what we are hearing.  Let's start with the most recent annual report of the Census Bureau:  Income and Poverty in the United States:  2019.  According to this report, annual real median household income in the U.S. increased 6.8% in 2019, the largest annual increase recorded by the Census Bureau going back to 1967.  Black median household income in 2019 increased 7.9%, the largest on record and, per American Enterprise Institute economist Mark Perry, "almost nine times the average annual increase of 0.90% over the last half-century."

The Editor says...
Hmmm... Who was the President in 2019, when blacks were doing so well?

Media Caught In Yet Another Massive Anti-Trump Lie; Will Election Fraud Be Next?  More than a year after the events at Lafayette Square happened, and after endless media claims that President Donald Trump had peaceful protesters forcibly cleared for a photo op, we finally know the truth.  Trump was right.  The media were lying.  And anyone who trusted the news accounts was a fool.  It's enough to make us start to wonder why anyone should trust the media's insistence that there was no widespread fraud in the 2020 election.  Yesterday, the Interior Department's inspector general released a report about what actually happened in Lafayette Square on June 1, 2020.

When "Fake News" Is Actually Fake.  In the last 24 hours, we've seen what a complete shambles the mainstream media have become.  First up, someone at the New York Times was formatting a fake story about watermelons on Mars — perhaps this was a training exercise for a new employee? — but somehow managed to press the "publish" button, and this appeared on the Times website: [...] But wait — there's more!  At yesterday's presser for Vice President Harris in Mexico, a Univision reporter got up and slobbered all over the VP.  The Media Research Center has the story, and here's the relevant part of the transcript: [...] There's only one problem:  Univision says Maria Fernanda doesn't work for Univision.  Univision issued multiple statements distancing themselves from Fernanda.

Father Biden Celebrates Mass(Acre).  The press did its part to help usher in Tulsa Massacre Day, running breathless stories with inflated casualty figures ("300 black dead!  No, 3,000!  Wait, make that 30,000!"), always being careful to avoid mentioning the white dead or the fact that the authorities pretty much had the situation under control until the armed black mob showed up (most historians agree that it was a black who fired the first shot).  And although airplanes were indeed used in the course of the riot for observation of crowds and fires, the press added — unchallenged — lurid and questionable accounts of planes dropping bombs on blacks, blitzkrieg-style (in fact, the only offensive use of a plane during the riots was when a white pilot flew over the black part of town dragging a banner depicting a massively overweight white woman, hoping it would make the blacks look up and stare long enough to be disarmed).  Of course, the good news — trumpeted by Biden during his speech — is that black Tulsa was rebuilt, and today the community is stronger than ever at almost 16% of the city.  Not mentioned by the president was that the city also has one of the worst crime rates in the U.S., hitting a three-decade high in 2020, a year in which far more Tulsa blacks died due to homicide than in 1921 due to the riot.  But don't worry; no one will call that a "massacre."

The Media's Wuhan Lab Scandal Looks Worse and Worse.  You'd think that after the Covington kids disaster and the Steele dossier calamity the American news media would get the message.  Which is to say, report facts, not liberal narratives.  But of course, ain't happening. [...] Trump Derangement Syndrome is a disease that continues to amaze.  Otherwise rational people — journalists in this case — are so consumed with TDS that they quite voluntarily throw any semblance of standards over the side to guarantee their anti-Trump bona fides with their also-TDS infected liberal media colleagues.  The Covington kids were racist!  Liberal media heads nod in unison, eventually brought to the realization — not coincidentally helped by lawsuits — that there was zero truth to their carefully structured narrative of arrogant white kids tormenting an aging Native American.

Facebook's Speech Suppression Argues for Repeal of Section 230 and a Facebook Stock Price of Zero.  A lot of people have egg on their face for dismissing the COVID-19 lab-leak theory.  As ABC News's Jonathan Karl said this week.  "Some things may be true even if Donald Trump said them."  Or if Arkansas Sen. Tom Cotton said them.  "We still don't know where coronavirus originated," Cotton said in January 2020.  "Could have been a market, a farm, a food processing company.  I would note that Wuhan has China's only biosafety level-four super laboratory that works with the world's most deadly pathogens to include, yes, coronavirus."  Cotton never said he was certain the virus came from a lab leak and never suggested a leak would have been deliberate.  But as a Trump supporter, he was quickly smeared, as liberal writer Matthew Yglesias shows in a painstaking analysis, for pushing "conspiracy theories" (CBS News), "spreading rumors that were easily debunked" (Politico), "repeating a coronavirus conspiracy theory that was already debunked" (Washington Post), and "repeat[ing] fringe theory of coronavirus origins" (New York Times).  In each case, Yglesias points out, writers mischaracterized what Cotton actually said.

Another Deranged Trump Vengeance Fantasy from Vanity Fair.  It takes no great imagination to determine what is probably the focus of the mind of Vanity Fair's Bess Levin.  Even a quick perusal of her articles over the past year reveals her disturbing obsession with Donald Trump 24/7.  So obsessed is Levin with Trump that she will even lie in her articles to make up fake quotes about him such as her March 8 screed in which she put a false quote in Lindsay Graham's mouth where he supposedly said, "I'm willing to overlook the fact that Trump has probably beaten a few homeless people to death."  Most responsible periodicals would have said "no" and maybe had her checked by a therapist.  The fact that she remains employed at Vanity Fair says something about the ethics that magazine.

Transgender Censorship:  USA Today Erases 'Hurtful' Words From Female Athlete's Op-Ed.  On Saturday [5/22/2021], USA Today published an op-ed written by Chelsea Mitchell, one of three female athletes at the center of a legal challenge to Connecticut's unfair transgender rules that allow biological males to compete against females in women's sports.  Apparently facing some backlash a few days after publication, USA Today altered Mitchell's words and claimed that she had used "hurtful language."  On Tuesday, USA Today slapped an "Editor's Note" at the top of the article.  The note reads, "This column has been updated to reflect USA TODAY's standards and style guidelines.  We regret that hurtful language was used."  What language was so "hurtful" that USA Today altered it three days after publication?  The publication removed every mention of the biological term "male" and replaced it with the indeterminate word "transgender."

Fact-checking the fact-checkers.  It is time for the news business to admit that "fact-checking" is a tiresome, misleading, and dishonest blight on actual reporting.  It hardly existed in Fleet Street when I left Britain in 1997.  Checking facts was understood to be the core of a reporter's job, not something sloughed off to someone else.  Perhaps this was because British education was mostly essay writing, not checking multiple-choice boxes.  Students quickly learn to write fluently when faced with blank sheets of foolscap and limited time to fill them.  Quality obviously varied, but educated people were assumed to be capable of coherent composition.  The residual challenge was knowing the facts or, in the case of reporters, finding them out.  So, it was startling at first to encounter America's bifurcated system, in which "fact-checkers" monitor reporters like gamekeepers trying to catch poachers.  And it's far worse now than it was back then.  Fact-checking has grown beyond recognition in the past 25 years and chokes the news business like a parasitic vine.

The Covid Lab Leak went from terrible, racist conspiracy theory to plausible overnight for the mainstream media.  [Thread reader]  If you don't believe me, look at these stories side-by-side, then vs. now.  You may remember that much of the really bad coverage was focused on @SenTomCotton's suggestion that we better understand the potential for a lab leak from Wuhan.  The difference in framing here from @nytimes between May 2020 and May 2021 is... stark.  [Illustrations]  But it wasn't just NYT.  There's a lot of ammo from @CNN, too.  Not even two months ago, they ran a piece writing off the lab leak theory as "like something out of a comic book."  Yesterday, the tone had changed, without any reference to their own role in the previous debate.  [Illustrations]  But if you go back further, @CNN's coverage gets even worse.  Early in 2020, they ran CCP talking points suggesting it was all a political tactic based on "disinformation."

Don't let the media get away with U-turning on the lab leak theory.  The theory that COVID-19 originated in a Chinese laboratory has completed its year-long trudge — from fringe nutjob idea to mainstream and expert-approved opinion.  Leading scientists and epidemiologists such as none other than Dr Anthony Fauci were so quick to dismiss the 'lab talk'.  It was first portrayed as a hare-brained wild and tacitly racist conspiracy theory driven by paranoid Republican senators and fever-dream right-wing media.  Now it is seen as not only an acceptable theory worth more study, but one that has broken through into the mainstream.  This has happened in a matter of days.  Where does Sen. Tom Cotton go for his apology?  Interestingly enough, the lab leak theory started gaining more traction — not only in the international community, but in the scientific community in the United States — right around the same time that questions of United States government funding of EcoHealth Alliance, a research and collection group of bat coronaviruses in China, may have lead to gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Will the 2020 Madness Last?  Before 2020, the American people tired of the media farces surrounding such events as the Duke lacrosse team, the lies about the Covington kids, and Jussie Smollett's hoax about being attacked by white racists.  Will they return to their earlier skepticism about media hype when it increasingly seems like the media and the government mostly lied when denying the possibility that the coronavirus leaked from a Wuhan lab engaged in "gain-of-function" engineering of dangerous viruses?

Exactly How Corporate Media Launders Opinion To Attack Inconvenient People And Facts.  A New York Times business correspondent in Hong Kong, a weekend editor at The Guardian who lives in New York, a British Business Insider reporter with a focus on the Saudis, and the executive editor of The Daily Beast.  A 48-year-old blogger who works for Rachel Maddow, a union activist who covers "extremism, far-right politics and media disinformation" for The Huffington Post, and the 29-year editor of the Arkansas Times.  A breaking news reporter at The Washington Post who wrapped up her most recent internship in May 2016, a 2016 University of Pennsylvania graduate who covers "young people doing big things" for Forbes, a 45-year-old former George Will intern who writes for CNN, and David Frum.  What do these people have in common, aside from their political ideology?  Every one of them is a part of a machine that launders smears and opinions through newspapers, magazines, and television channels, presents the cleaned-up product as unimpeachable truth to the public, and then uses the fresh-minted facts to protect friends and hurt enemies.  It's called "the news," and here's how it worked for Arkansas' Sen. Tom Cotton's completely plausible theory that COVID-19 came from a Chinese lab.

Cruz Decimates Brian Williams After He Goes Full Dem Operative on Him.  Folks on the left have been freaking out at Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) for criticizing the "woke ad" put out by the military. [...] CNN's Jake Tapper even pushed the garbage that Cruz was spreading "Russian propaganda," as we reported earlier.  CNN once again showing their "objective reporting."  But even Tapper wasn't as bad as MSNBC's Brian Williams.  Again, remember, Brian Williams is promoted as an objective journalist.  But he's hardly that.  Here was his response to Cruz's remarks, giving him the nickname "Kremlin Cruz."  [Tweet]  How is that journalism?  Or even close to being an accurate description of what Cruz was saying?  They know his point; they simply choose to twist it to attack him.  It's not news, but flat-out bias, acting like a Democratic operative.  Now, let's remember these are the folks who spread Russian disinformation for the past four years to try to delegitimize the duly elected American president.

LA Times slammed for article praising lockdowns and downplaying effect on economy.  The Los Angeles Times was slammed Wednesday [5/19/2021] over a business column claiming coronavirus lockdowns saved lives without harming the economy.  The column, titled "The evidence is clear — COVID lockdowns saved lives without harming economies," cited published data and concluded "lockdowns played a significant role in reducing infection rates" and "had a very modest role in producing economic damage."  In the article, Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Michael Hiltzik criticized red-state governors like Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis for opposing lockdowns.  He also suggested that California's stringent lockdowns are the reason why the state now "boasts among the lowest case, hospitalization and death rates in the nation, as well as a recovering economy."

LA Times Op-Ed:  The Evidence Is Clear... The Lockdowns Didn't Trash the Economy.  Whoever wrote this is on bath salts.  Is this for real?  I mean I know media bubbles are dense, but this is something else.  This is not even grounded in reality, folks Apparently, the COVID lockdowns didn't trash the economy and it saved lives.  Both are demonstrably false.  That's the hottest of hot takes regarding the virus.  Dare I say, it may be worse than what Anthony Fauci has said about the vaccine and mask-wearing.  It could rival that, maybe.  The fact is that millions of jobs were lost, mental health issues spiked, our children weren't learning, people did die, and the lockdowns didn't do anything to stem that.  It's an airborne virus.  It was going to spread no matter what and what we've learned is that staying locked up inside was probably the worst thing for people to do.

Let's Talk About Reporting in War Zones.  The AP reporters certainly knew they had Hamas neighbors. [...] Terror groups use human shields, and the press apparently volunteers to shield them.  Here's the thing:  There's nothing surprising about Western press organizations making arrangements with terror regimes.  It happens all the time in the Middle East.  CNN refrained from reporting on Saddam Hussein's atrocities in Iraq in order to keep its office in Baghdad open.  The New York Times famously led a tour group to the Islamic Republic of Iran.  This situation is even more overt and obvious in Gaza.  The only reason a press outfit like the AP has to open a bureau there is to cover Hamas, but it's never been interested in reporting on how the group stores missiles in homes, schools, and hospitals, or on how little of the money it receives from Tehran goes to building civilian infrastructure or responsible governance.  That's because the only story Hamas wants coming out of Gaza is about the fundamental evil of the Zionist entity.

Propaganda War, Maricopa Board of Supervisors Leaks Senate Letter to Media Before Sending [it] to [the] Arizona Senate.  Earlier today [5/17/2021] Arizona GOP Chairwoman Kelli Ward noted the Maricopa Board of Supervisors (BoS) was engaging in a propaganda war against the people of Arizona and the State Senate.  It didn't take long for evidence to surface.  The Board of Supervisors [sent] the media a copy of the 13-page letter they claim to have sent to the Arizona Senate.  However, AZ Senate President Karen Fann has never even see the letter.  The BoS sent the letter to the media before they sent it to the AZ Senate.  Yeah, propaganda.

USA Today Editorial Says Republicans Are Bigger Threat Than 9/11 Hijackers After Cheney Ouster.  Rep. Liz Cheney's ouster proved Republicans are a bigger threat than the 9/11 hijackers who killed thousands of Americans, according to a USA Today editorial.  The removal of Cheney from her leadership position suggests that the GOP has endorsed election fraud conspiracy theories, USA Today editor David Mastio wrote in a Thursday editorial.  Endorsing such conspiracy theories, which allege that President Joe Biden didn't actually win the election, poses a bigger threat to the U.S. than 9/11 hijackers ever did, he said.  "The fact that the majority of Republicans believe our election was stolen is a sure sign that more violence is to come," Mastio wrote, according to USA Today.

How the New York Times has published lies to serve a biased narrative.  On April 15, the Biden administration acknowledged there was no evidence that Russia ever offered bounties on American troops in Afghanistan, walking back a report that wounded former President Donald Trump in the run-up to the 2020 election.  Four days later, the Washington, DC, medical examiner revealed that Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick had not been murdered by rampaging Trump supporters during the Jan. 6 Capitol Hill riot, as reports had claimed, but had died of natural causes.  Both stories were based on anonymous, unidentifiable sources, but had become deeply enmeshed in the public consciousness.  Both confirmed the assumptions of the nation's left-leaning media and academic elite, while damaging their political enemies.  And both were driven by The New York Times, where malicious misreporting has been the practice for a century, argues journalist and media commentator Ashley Rindsberg.

The Incredible Vanishing Flu.  Seasonal influenza, also known as "the flu," visits America every year, similar to tornados, thunderstorms, heat waves, and snowstorms.  As tracked by the CDC, over the past decade symptomatic flu cases ranged from 9 to 45 million cases per year in the US.  Hospitalizations varied from 140 to 810 thousand, and deaths from 12 to 61 thousand, depending on the particular year, strain of influenza, and effectiveness of the vaccine.  This year, "flu activity is unusually low at this time" according to CDC surveillance.  Since late September 2020, they recorded only about 2000 cases, a minute fraction of the tens of millions of cases in past years.  Hospitalizations this flu season are minimal with only 224 confirmed influenza hospitalizations from September 2020 to mid-April 202, nowhere near the hundreds of thousands of hospitalizations in past seasons.

Hey, LA Times — Don't Tread on Hillsdale College.  On April 23, Julie Appleby, a senior correspondent with the Kaiser Health News network, published a piece in the Los Angeles Times headlined, "Michigan's Outbreak Worries Scientists.  Will Conservative Outposts Keep Pandemic Rolling?" implying that both the sleepy Michigan town where I live, and the college I attend, are biohazards: [...] Appleby needs to choose.  Is Hillsdale bad because it "jumped the line" to distribute unused vaccines or is it evil because it isn't properly concerned about the illness?  She won't, of course.  Her obsession with a college in a region of the country where she has no obvious connection belabors a more deep-rooted hatred.  Appleby's "reporting" isn't a good-faith criticism but an attempt to call down the Eye of Soros on her political enemies.  She wants to destroy the way of life my neighbors and I enjoy.

Corporate News Outlets Again "Confirm" the Same False Story, While Many Refuse to Correct it.  One of the primary plagues of corporate journalism, which I have documented more times than I can count, just reared its ugly head again to deceive millions of people with fake news.  When one large news outlet publishes a false story based on whispers from anonymous security state agents with the CIA or FBI, other news outlets quickly purport that they have "independently confirmed" the false story, in order to bolster its credibility (oh, it must be true since other outlets have also confirmed it). This is an obvious scam — they have not "independently confirmed" anything but rather merely acted as servants to the same lying security state agents who planted the original false story — but they do it over and over, creating the deceitful perception that a fake story has been "confirmed" by multiple outlets, thus bolstering its credibility in the public mind.  It was the favored tactic for spreading debunked Russiagate frauds and is still used.  One of the most vivid examples occurred in December, 2017, when CNN falsely reported what it hyped as "a major bombshell":  that Donald Trump, Jr. had advance access to the WikiLeaks archive.  Within an hour, NBC News' Ken Dilanian and CBS News both claimed they had "independently confirmed" this fairy tale.  When it turned out that it was a complete lie, all based on a false date on an email to Trump Jr., these outlets embarrassingly corrected it hours later and then simply moved on as if it never happened, never explaining how multiple outlets could possibly have all "independently confirmed" the same blatant falsehood.

The Giuliani Walk Back Gets Worse and Exposes Collusion in Mainstream Press.  The fact that the news organizations are working in tandem on narratives blows up in their hands.  It was another example of an important news outlet having to retract a major news story, as Bonchie reported yesterday, when The Washington Post had to retract its prior claim that both Rudy Giuliani and the news network One America News had been informed by the FBI that they had part of a Russian disinformation campaign.  "This version has been corrected to remove assertions that OAN and Giuliani received the warnings," the outlet says in part of its retraction.

Fake News Still Gaslighting America with Phony Polls.  Opinion polls, particularly in the buildup to a presidential election, are not designed to reflect public opinion, but instead to shape it.  For the media, objectivity is only of historic interest, a journalistic tenet from a bygone era.  Now most of the media is embedded within the Democrat party, serving as an advocacy arm or political action committee to influence elections and agendas.  A CNN staffer, who bragged that he was "one step down" from a director, admitted to an undercover Tinder date, actually a real journalist working for James O'Keefe's Project Veritas, that CNN was "creating a story" that "we didn't know anything about," calling it "propaganda" to help remove President Trump from office.  The epitome of fake news.  Fake news media have many gaslighting tools at their disposal.  Some outlets doctor audio or video tapes to make their "bad guy" appear racist or doing something illegal.  Or, they make their "good guy" look like Mother Teresa.

Media Promotes Fake Narrative That Biden a Moderate.  Stephen Collinson is well-known among conservatives as the most hackneyed of the hacks at CNN.  The Twitter account called CNN Politics promoted Collinson's latest online essay with the words "President [Joe] Biden to showcase his moderate radicalism in his big congressional address."  "Moderate radicalism"?  Doesn't that make about as much sense as "quiet loudness"?  Collinson argued:  "Biden's quiet radicalism is expressed through a huge pandemic rescue bill, a larger proposal that redefines the concept of infrastructure, and a massive health and child care blueprint."  In other words, a socialist blueprint. [...] But Biden's "superpower" here is the media elite.  They are the ones who have sold Jimmy Carter, Walter Mondale, Michael Dukakis, Bill and Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden as moderates.  This has grown increasingly ridiculous, but they keep shifting the "center" to the extreme left. [...] This isn't "news."  It's just sales.

Meghan McCain calls out 'rigged' media, throws 'The View' under the bus for burying Hunter Biden scandal.  Reacting to a discussion about Fox News supposedly pushing false narratives, self-described "token conservative" and vocal Never Trumper Meghan McCain dropped a truth bomb about how corporate media liberals, even on her TV program, seemingly pick and choose what stories to cover, with advancing a left-wing agenda foremost in mind.  Ignoring Hunter Biden's various alleged scandals was a fundamental error of omission by the mainstream media, she asserted.  "Let's go down the list of things every day that are inaccurate on CNN and NBC, and then we'll talk about fairness in the media," McCain also declared on The View.

The Fourteen Most Troubling Obama And Kerry Lies About The JCPOA Iran Nuke Deal.  Joe Biden and his foreign policy team are negotiating with Iran, trying to get the U.S. back into the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action ("JCPOA") Iran nuclear deal.  Many support this objective, not realizing that the JCPOA allows Iran to build nuclear weapons in the near future, and place the United States, the Sunni Gulf States, and Israel in grave danger.  The support for returning to the JCPOA stems from naïvité.  Much of Obama and Kerry told America about the JCPOA was not true.  Most of the MSM covered up the lies back then and are still not reporting the truth about the deal.

The far-left Los Angeles Times says...
There is no absolute right to refuse vaccination.  We're getting closer to the point where every American who wants to be vaccinated will have gotten their needle stick.  A quarter of Americans say they don't plan to be vaccinated; in vaccine-friendlier California, that's 1 in 5.  Of those who don't plan to be immunized, some worry about the newness of the vaccines, while others just don't like vaccines in general, despite the mountains of proof about how many lives they save, and some stubbornly refuse to believe that COVID-19 is all that dangerous.

The Editor says...
Tyranny is far more dangerous than any disease — especially a disease which isn't "all that dangerous," as many sensible people believe.  Mandatory vaccination is especially dangerous when the vaccine — or whatever it really is — is experimental, and it is impossible to know its long-term side effects.  Mandatory vaccination(s) will inevitably put everyone in a position of having to prove they've had their shots, which would require a so-called vaccination passport to enter public buildings, fly on an airplane, or vote, to name a few examples.  This is a quick and easy recipe for abject tyranny.

Master Class In Speaking Truth To Power As Ben Domenech Exposes Chris Wallace's Journalism Grift.  Ben Domenech visited Fox News tonight and gave a master class in speaking truth to power when he humiliated Fox News' most insufferable, nepotism-enriched grifter and BlueAnon conspiracy theorist, Chris Wallace.  Wallace had just finished his regular routine of pretending to be totally oblivious to the lavish praise he heaps on America Lasters and the seething hatred he harbors for America Firsters.  This time around, specifically, he was pretending to be really surprised at just how well he thinks Biden's speech went (shocker!), and how well he truly believes in his heart of hearts it will be received by the American people (shocker!).  Wallace, of course, is doing what he and his propagandist pals always do:  they tell whatever story they want to be true for as long as they want and then when it's revealed to be a steaming pile of idiocy and lies, they simply turn the page and pretend it never happened.

USA Today's publisher Gannett apologizes after being caught helping Stacey Abrams hide encouragement for Georgia losing the All-Star Game.  The largest publisher of newspapers in the United States by total circulation has been caught red-handed engaging in Orwellian rewriting of history to help Stacey Abrams hide her promotion of the boycott of her home state of Georgia by the MLB all-Star Game.  Ms. Abrams is regarded as a savior by many on the left, even future presidential material, and is even excused for delusionally claiming to be the actual elected governor of Georgia after losing that race by tens of thousands of votes, despite the left's new dogma pronouncing it a crime against democracy to question the legitimacy of Joe Biden's election.  Her promotion of the doctrine of Black "voter suppression" when IDs are required for voting, and her energetic promotion of registration and vote gathering efforts by Democrats have given her a status as an untouchable goddess, apparently.  Even as Black registration and turnout in Georgia put the lie to the suppression narrative.

A Great New Idea for Reducing Police Shootings.  [Scroll down]  The "news" that is plated for us mostly is fake.  It is not the Torah.  It is an enterprise that seeks to generate profit among us by baiting us into clicking and into becoming "followers" and ginning up their ratings, all while the media also seek to sway public opinion.  Hitler proved with Der Stürmer that an entire country could be brainwashed and turned politically by newspapers.  Stalin proved the same with Izvestia and Pravda.  Americans have proven no different, no less gullible and malleable.  A concerted full-court press by CBS, NBC, ABC, PBS, CNN, MSNBC, the New York Times, the Washington Post, Twitter, and Facebook is enough to sway elections.  Lies may abound before the voting, with other uncomfortable news stories suppressed like the one about Hunter Biden's laptop.  Then, after the final election tallies are announced, a day or two of apologies for lying can be offered to Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley at Senate hearings, and that refreshes the ground until next time.  We live amid lies.

Fake Chicago Police tweet about Derek Chauvin not being removed by Twitter, CPD says.  Twitter is refusing to remove or attach a warning to a doctored image that purports to show a Chicago Police Department tweet that states, "We are all Derek Chauvin" — despite that the post is not real and the agency has made several attempts to have it taken down, CPD officials tell Fox News.  The altered image began circulating on Twitter at the beginning of the weekend and features a picture of Chauvin, the recently convicted Minneapolis Police officer, underneath the five-word sentence, which appears in bigger font than is customarily used on the social media platform.  By Saturday, the post had garnered approximately 38,600 retweets and 175,000 likes, according to local news site CWBChicago.

Abortion Pills Are Not 'Medication'.  Many in the media are increasingly referring to abortion pills as "medication" — but their terminology couldn't be further from the truth.  That's because the purpose of medicine is to save lives.  The purpose of abortion is to end them.  The most recent example came when the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced that women may temporarily receive the drug mifepristone — the first of two pills in a chemical abortion — by mail.  The news comes months after the Supreme Court granted the FDA's previous request to reinstate a federal requirement that says women must obtain it from a health care provider in person.  Now, the FDA will halt enforcing this requirement during the pandemic.  In their reports, outlets from the New York Times to Teen Vogue referred to mifepristone as "medication."  In order to distinguish from surgical abortion, many in the media already use "medication abortion," "medical abortion," or "chemical abortion" to describe an abortion administered by pill.  But only recently have major outlets begun switching the words around to use phrases such as "abortion medication" to call abortion itself a type of medicine.

WaPo Writer Doesn't Get Concerns About Driving Near Protesters, Here's an Explainer.  Washington Post opinion writer Radley Balko tweeted that he didn't quite get why some people were so worried about "inadvertently driving near a protest, getting stuck in front of a wall of protesters, then getting pulled out of their car and beaten."  [Tweet]  In his tweet, he referenced a ridiculous article from "The New Republic" which claimed Republicans wanted the "right to crash cars into people" and that Republicans were endorsing a "terroristic tactic" against "protesters."  [More tweets]  As I've covered the protests/riots over the past year, I've seen many encounters that have ranged from minor harassment to someone ending up dead.  I'm not sure what Balko has been watching over the past year, but BLM/Antifa people are constantly blocking cars in the street and getting into encounters with drivers.

Corporate Media And Other Race-Baiters Have Incited More Violence Than Trump Ever Did.  Adam Toledo is a name that has likely saturated your newsfeed over the past month.  He was a 13-year-old Mexican-American boy who was fatally shot by a police officer on Chicago's West Side not one month ago.  This week, that name was overshadowed by Ma'Khia Bryant, a black teenager who died at the hands of law enforcement in Ohio.  In both cases, leftist politicians and Twitter-verified "journalists" couldn't get the story out fast enough, absent facts, video, or nuance — but the headlines wrote themselves:  "Racist Cop Shoots Unarmed Minority."  Also in both cases, the stories turned out to be completely wrong.  On Wednesday we learned that Bryant wasn't just standing in her driveway unarmed, or just casually holding a knife, or even dueling with another armed kid in a "knife fight" when the officer discharged his weapon.  After the officer arrived, she lunged with a knife at another black girl she had pinned against a car, after having already charged a different girl nearby.  She was armed and dangerous.  And the officer, although accused of being a racist pig by even the White House, instead saved at least one black girl's life.

Cuomo, Lemon:  NBC Committed 'Malpractice' By Not Showing Knife.  While doubling down during Thursday's [4/22/2021] CNN Tonight handoff on their support for Officer Nicholas Reardon's decision to shoot knife-wielding Ma'Khia Bryant, CNN hosts Chris Cuomo and Don Lemon blasted outlets like NBC who didn't show the knife in Bryant's hand while reporting on the shooting.  The pair accused such outlets of "journalistic malpractice" because they weren't being honest (an ironic notion given who was flinging it).  Their knock came as NewsBusters drove part of the Thursday news cycle with a report exposing NBC's deception against their audience; editing out a key part of the 911 call and not showing the knife, before silently adding them in an update.  "And, we've got to be honest about these things.  And if we're not honest about these things, as journalists, then it is a dereliction of our duty as journalists.  It's journalistic malpractice not to do it," Lemon opined to his friend.

Will the Times apologize for lying about Officer Sicknick's death?  An unruly crowd entered the US Capitol on Jan. 6, while then-President Donald Trump addressed a rally several blocks away.  One member of that crowd, Ashli Babbitt, an unarmed woman and a veteran, was shot by the Capitol Police.  The next day, Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick died in the hospital.  On Jan. 8, The New York Times reported that Officer Sicknick had died after being struck in the head with a fire extinguisher by violent Trump supporters.  This story was quickly repeated by numerous other media outlets.  Millions believed it.  The story was false.  Sicknick died of two strokes, which occurred many hours after the invasion of the Capitol.  The blue-check-media fallback was that bear spray used by the Capitol invaders had caused the officer's strokes.  That also turned out to be false.  After a curiously long delay, the DC medical examiner's office released its report this week, and it concludes that Sicknick suffered no injuries, internal or external.  He didn't have a reaction to bear spray, the chief medical examiner reported.

Media Pants on Fire.  Media trust is at an all-time low, a majority of Americans believing that, "Most news organizations are more concerned with supporting an ideology or political position than with informing the public."  An Axios commissioned survey found that only 46 percent of Americans trusted traditional media, the lowest number ever recorded in the 20 years of this survey.  Gallup found similar distrust of the media, with only 40 percent of Americans having "a great deal" or even "a fair amount" of confidence that the media reports the news "fully accurately, and fairly".  The low point was a 32 percent level of trust in 2016 when Donald Trump was elected president and he correctly labeled the media as "fake news".  20 years ago, media trust was much higher, in the mid 50 percent range, despite Dan Rather at that time, a major network news anchor, lying about George W Bush's National Guard service.  In other words, the media is lying to us and we are catching on to the lies.

Officer Sicknick Died of Natural Causes, Not Riot Injuries.  This was just another massive lie used to gaslight the American people and justify an ongoing manhunt for Trump supporters who had the audacity to protest an illegitimate election.

Glenn Greenwald on what the truth about Officer Sicknick's death says about the media.  We learned yesterday that Officer Brian Sicknick died of natural causes.  The significance of that admission was not just for Sicknick's immediate family, some of whom already seem to have known he didn't die from an attack with a fire extinguisher.  The real significance was the way in which this undercut the media's confident framing of his death as a victim of the Jan. 6 riot.  Yesterday, Glenn Greenwald took this occasion to point out how this lie got going and why the media desperately wanted it to be true. [...] The partisan motivation for this to be true was so overwhelming that doubt about it was treated as a kind of heresy.  The media's progressive voices worked as the equivalent of Hockey goons to punish anyone who dared to say different.

The New York Times Has Just Been Caught In Two Monstrous Lies.  On Tuesday, the public learned that Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick died of natural causes.  Just a few days before that, the public learned that the "Russian Bounty" story was fake.  In other words, in the span of a week, the "newspaper of record" has been exposed for grossly misleading the public about two major stories — both designed to discredit President Donald Trump. [...] Start with Sicknick.  The New York Times was the paper that reported he'd been killed by a pro-Trump protester who threw a fire extinguisher at Sicknick during the Jan. 6 incursion into the Capitol Building.  The Times claimed that, after being struck and suffering a "bloody gash on his head," Sicknick "was rushed to the hospital and placed on life support" where he later died. [...] What did the Times base its story on?  Unnamed sources, of course.  There were no pictures.  No videos.  No on-the-record accounts.  No medical examiner's report.  The story fell apart, as news emerged — no thanks to the mainstream press — that Sicknick had texted his family about being in good spirits that night.  Then we learned that he'd returned to his office after the events at the Capitol, and only later went to the hospital.

A New Poll Shows the Pollsters Aren't Even Trying Anymore.  You've probably noticed a barrage of approval rating polls being released in the past month or so, and nearly all of them show Joe Biden as a president for the ages.  We've seen such high numbers as 60% approval in some surveys.  Perhaps Biden is just that much of a unifier, despite pushing the most radical, divisive agenda in modern history?  Or perhaps there's something else going on with these polls.  Yeah, it's the latter.  Random thought, but if your sample is coming out to a raw D+31 sample, perhaps there's something wrong with your pool that you are originally drawing from?  Are they just calling people in blue states?  Further, if you look at the internals, they only weight the poll to D+9, while the 2020 election was Biden +4.  The margin was even smaller in the vote totals for the House, for example.  In other words, the country much more evenly divided than shown here, but according to these pollsters, we are in a new era of peace and unity.  The purpose of this is clear: to push a narrative of inevitability going into 2022 for Democrats.

Democrat-run institutions are cheating to prop up the Biden administration.  In three months, Joe Biden has exffectively erased all American norms.  Worse, he's done so by executive fiat rather than the legislative process.  It's likely that only Democrats (and not even all Democrats) support him.  Nevertheless, a Pew poll, which the media is shilling, assures us that he's got a 59% approval rating.  Dig into the poll, though, and it's a lie [...].  In other words, we are being sold a narrative that has nothing to do with the truth.  First, about that poll. [...] It turns out that, as to some of those things, we know that most Americans oppose Biden's policies.  On Court-packing, an October poll that the New York Times conducted showed that 58% of likely voters oppose it.  Americans feel even more strongly about voter ID:  75% of them support it.  Americans also disapprove of Biden's border policy, with 55% of them saying he's doing a bad job and only 29% saying he's doing a good job.

MSM Edits Police Bodycam Footage And Removes The Part Where 13-yr-old Adam Toledo Is Seen Holding Firearm.  Dan Herbert, a Chicago attorney who has represented a number of police officers involved in deadly use of force incidents, says the officer who shot and killed 13-year-old Adam Toledo "absolutely had a reason to fire" if he believed the teen possessed a gun while turning toward him.  The Civilian Office of Police Accountability — the city's police oversight agency — on Thursday released body camera videos and other related materials two days after Adam's family was shown footage of the March 29 shooting in Little Village.  The footage shows an officer chasing Adam in an alley while shouting at him to stop.  Adam appears to pause near a fence bordering a parking lot at the end of the alley and turn toward the officer with his hands up but just moments before he threw away his gun.

CBS News Edited Police Body Cam Video To Mask Teen Holding A Gun Before He Was Fatally Shot.  CBS News deceptively cropped body camera footage that showed a 13-year-old boy holding a gun before he was fatally shot by Chicago police in March.  A law enforcement officer fatally shot Adam Toledo during an encounter in response to gunshots heard on a police scanner.  Police said Toledo ignored "verbal directions, fled, used significant force, and was armed with a semiautomatic pistol," which is why the officer fired.  Body cam footage released this week appears to show Toledo holding a weapon moments before he was shot, but CBS News posted a clip to its website and Twitter page that cropped out the footage showing the teen's alleged firearm.

Media pushes false narrative of racism.  The riots that have erupted after the killing of Daunte Wright reinforce a familiar pattern.  This response is rooted not only in tragedy, but in a distorted perception of reality.  Chelsea Handler, for example, suggested that people of color have a "50-50" chance of being shot by police.  This is a complete distortion, but fits a broader pattern.  My latest report for the Manhattan Institute, based on multiple surveys, shows that being exposed to news and social media, having left-wing views on race, and being anxious or depressed explains a great deal of how much racism a person perceives.  And when someone says racism in America has risen, this perception is almost entirely a figment of their imagination.  In fact, racist attitudes and behaviors have been declining for decades.

Liz Cheney Plays the Fool After Anti-Trump 'Bombshell' Collapses.  Yesterday, Joe Biden's own intelligence community dropped the news that the "Russian bounties" story used to target President Trump was absolute garbage.  Of course, some of us knew it before the 2020 election and reported that (see That 'Bombshell' Russian Bounty Story Was Just Officially Shown to Be Garbage).  Once again, "right-wing" news outlets were proven right while CNN and other "unbiased" outlets were made to look like the unreliable, partisan sources they are.  But on the political side, there was one figure who went all-in on the nonsense in order to try to keep the perpetual war in Afghanistan going.  That person was Rep. Liz Cheney.

Fake news on Afghanistan and Russia:  The media's bounty of lies.  Remember when the press and leftist politicians badgered President Trump?  A story came out from the New York Times in 2020 claiming that Russia was paying bounties to Talibanites to kill U.S. troops stationed there.  (As if these Islamofacist maniacs might not be motivated otherwise to do it themselves.)  Oh, the brouhaha it drew!  President Trump was constantly blamed for not taking the problem 'seriously' and America-hating Democrats had a field day of playing patriot.  It came out during election season, and Joe Biden played it to the hilt, being Mr. Patriot and all, despite never serving.  The aim of all this tiresome crap, played over and over and over on the nighttime news, was to Get Trump, by bringing back that old dead cat about Trump being Putin's puppet.  Turns out that this bounty claim was, like a lot of these stories, a naked, total lie.

U.S. Intelligence Now Says Story of Russian Bounties on American Troops Likely False.  After the media blew up a story about Russian military putting bounties on American troops in an effort to shape a Russian collusion narrative against the administration of President Trump, the U.S. intelligence community now says that story was likely false.

Conrad Black's Tour de Force.  Today [4/13/2021] Conrad Black has an outstanding take-down of the WSJ's foolish anti-Trump editorial (on Friday).  The WSJ editorial is titled "The GOP's Trump Problem" — see, Trump is the problem. [...] Black covers a lot of ground.  I'll try to summarize the main points, while urging readers to follow the link — you won't regret it.  Black talks turkey, explains the facts of political life in lucid terms.  Black's basic thesis is that the WSJ has things exactly backwards.  Trump is not the problem for the GOP. Rather, the Never Trumps are the problem.  Trump had a remarkably successful term, especially in light of the constant betrayals and the concerted Dem and Deep State assault on our constitutional order.  The reality, contrary to the WSJ's view, is that Republicans want more of the Trump agenda — whether led by Trump himself or by a Trump approved proxy.  In fact, the disastrous start and likely deepening national crisis we are experiencing under the Zhou Baiden regime (whoever or what cabal actually is pulling the strings) favor this solution for the GOP, in Black's view.

The GOP's Trump Solution.  The Wall Street Journal on Friday [4/9/2021] published an editorial headlined "The GOP's Trump Problem."  It gets things terribly wrong.  The GOP is Trump's party and it is the Wall Street Journal that has the Trump problem.  Having been commendably supportive of the former president through most of his term, the Journal joined in the general embarkation of NeverTrumpers over the ostensible election results.  The theory that inspired this headline is Trump had his chance but lost the election in a manner practically indistinguishable from defeated incumbents Jimmy Carter in 1980 and George H. W. Bush in 1992 (when there were no suggestions of questionable results).  The editors suggest further that Trump had exhausted any grounds he had for contesting the fairness of the counting of ballots, and that it was his duty to go quietly into that good night and do everything that he could to elect Republican senators in Georgia to preserve the Republican majority in the Senate and to enhance the likelihood of the reelection next year of Governor Brian Kemp of Georgia and his secretary of state Brad Raffensperger.

Dangerous Word Games:  Nets Drop 'Mostly Peaceful,' Riots Are Now 'Protests'.  The left's Orwellian redefining of words took a dangerous step Monday as all three of the broadcast networks (ABC, CBS, and NBC) started to refer to the riots of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota as "protests," effectively dropping the "mostly peaceful" label they were mocked for using in the summer of 2020.  All of this followed an apparently accidental shooting where a police officer seemingly went to use her Taser but discharged her duty pistol instead.  The first showing of the media's dangerous rebranding of riots came earlier in the day when an activist journalist screamed at Brooklyn Center Police Chief Tim Gannon, saying "there was no riot" as he described how his officers were attacked with projectiles.  "The officers that were putting themselves in harm's way were being pelted with frozen cans of pop, they were being pelted with concrete blocks," he told the press.  The truth didn't matter to the broadcast networks as they gaslit their audiences.  "A curfew now in place following protests and clashes with police," announced ABC's World News Tonight anchor, David Muir during the opening tease.  And as CBS Evening News anchor Norah O'Donnell teased the "violent protests," NBC Nightly News anchor Lester Holt noted that "protesters clashing with police."

Our Honesty Crisis:  How We Talk about Race.  Less than two weeks later, Noah Green rammed his car into Capitol Police officer William Evans and killed him near the fencing that surrounds the Capitol.  When Green emerged from his car with a knife, he was shot and killed.  Afterward it was revealed that Green was a follower of Louis Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam.  It does not bother me that Green was black or followed Farrakhan.  It bothers me that he killed a Capitol Hill police officer a week ago, and we won't talk about that story for very long.  On the other hand, three months after Officer Brian Sicknick died, many people still believe he was beaten to death by white supremacists with a fire extinguishers at the "insurrection" because the media lied so loudly about it.  All of it goes to show that if the lie is big enough, a lot of people do not even notice the correction — even if the victim's own mother tries to correct the narrative.

Another, Clearer Take on the Chauvin Trial.  I leave it to you to decide why, from the Trayvon Martin case to the George Floyd case, the media has so consistently misrepresented the facts.  Whether it is that unskilled reporters are covering these matters, or that the press is simply looking to attract consumers with florid tales, or that the media looks forward to destroying urban areas with false tales of murderous white racists (amid a shortage of real ones), I cannot say. [...] (I'd also note that it is my experience that reporters' deadlines often conflict with the way trials proceed, so that too often the prosecution (or in civil matters, the plaintiff) case is presented just before deadline and the cross examination occurs too late to be covered in that day's edition, leaving only a false, one-sided version of the day's action.)

The Hunter and Jim Biden story
  •   Wasn't hacked material
  •   Wasn't Russian misinformation
  •   Is something people deserved to know before voting
  •   Big tech + corporate media tried to make sure that didn't happen
  •   And now they're going to gaslight you about all of it.

Atlanta Journal-Constitution Offers Correction After Printing Biden's Lies About GA Election Law Bill.  The Atlanta Journal-Constitution (AJC) issued a correction on a story that made some false claims about Georgia's election law reform legislation.  The newspaper made the mistake of printing Democrat talking points, specifically remarks made by President Biden, instead of the truth.  AJC originally falsely reported that voting hours had been cut in the bill and failed to note that early voting days had been added for general elections while shortening the time for early voting in primary run-offs.  The newspaper printed the correction at the end of a story on liberal filmmaker and actor Tyler Perry.  Perry owns a large production company in the Atlanta area.  Perry was quick to come out against the Georgia legislation signed into law by Governor Kemp.  He voiced hope that the Department of Justice will look into "the unconstitutional law".

Journalists Attack the Powerless, Then Self-Victimize to Bar Criticisms of Themselves.  The daily newspaper USA Today is the second-most circulated print newspaper in the United States — more than The New York Times and more than double The Washington Post.  Only The Wall Street Journal has higher circulation numbers.  On Sunday [3/28/2021], the paper published and heavily promoted a repellent article complaining that "defendants accused in the Capitol riot Jan. 6 crowdfund their legal fees online, using popular payment processors and an expanding network of fundraising platforms, despite a crackdown by tech companies."  It provided a road map for snitching on how these private citizens — who are charged with serious felonies by the U.S. Justice Department but as of yet convicted of nothing — are engaged in "a game of cat-and-mouse as they spring from one fundraising tool to another" in order to avoid bans on their ability to raise desperately needed funds to pay their criminal lawyers to mount a vigorous defense.

These 6 Stupendous Hoaxes Are Reasons to Give Media Narrative About 'Asian Hate' the Hairy Eyeball.  But not every political battle is 1963 Birmingham and not every political foe is the KKK.  Reported violence against Asians is not necessarily Birmingham all over again.  The narrative that it's President Trump's fault because he used the phrase "China virus" last year strains credulity.  The all-too-eager anti-Trump media, however, amplifies this message.  Indeed, this story and others, including the COVID lockdown/mask information, and the attack on the Capitol Building on January 6th, all have taken on the tell tale signs of hit-and-run narrative-run journalism.  Caveat emptor.  We've seen the media fail to let facts get in the way of a too-good-to-check-story with disastrous results.  Here are just a few. [...]

Chris Wallace Falsely Claims New Georgia Law Bans Drinking Water While In Line For Voting.  Fox News' Chris Wallace claimed Sunday Georgia voters are prohibited from being given food or drink in line at the ballot box under a law the state's governor signed last week.  "Let's take a look at some of the provisions in Georgia," Wallace said during an interview with South Carolina Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham.  "The one that I think is creating the biggest fuss, it prohibits, it makes it a crime to give food or drink to voters waiting in line.  Senator, why on Earth if Americans are willing to wait hours to vote, would you make it a crime for people to come and give them a bottle of water?"  [Video clip]

The Commonalities Between the Rise of the Nazis and the Tactics of the American Left Cannot be Ignored.  [Scroll down]  Third, the Nazis perfected the art of indoctrinating the citizenry through propaganda and "fake news." Joseph Goebbels, Nazi minister of propaganda, is credited with saying:  "If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it." and "Think of the press as a great keyboard on which government can play."  This strategy has been and continues to be used to great success by the American left and their fellow travelers in the mainstream (Democrat) media.  Whether it is the Russian collusion hoax, the so-called armed insurrection on January 6, 2021, climate change as an existential threat to mankind, suppression of voting rights, white supremacy running rampant, the necessity of lockdowns for the Covid pandemic or a myriad of other fabrications, they left lies with impunity as a means to their ends... as did the Nazis.

Grassley To DoJ: Why Has No One Been Charged With Crimes Over False Kavanaugh Allegations?  Good question, especially since this happened two and a half years ago.  Will the Department of Justice enforce false-statements laws consistently, or only when special counsels are involved?  Thanks to Senate Democrats' sandbagging in the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation process, a number of people came out of the woodwork to make clearly false allegations to the Senate as a way to derail his appointment to the Supreme Court.  Grassley wants to know when they will face charges — and it's not the first time the ranking Senate Judiciary member has asked.

Truth And Lies In A Digital Media Era.  Those in the media who speak to us and desire to control us, but still want to avoid outright lies, do so by shading the truth, offering spin, or using phrases such as, "it's my opinion", "as I remember it" and, the chart-topper, "at this point why does it matter?".  They know they operate in an environment where falsehoods and misrepresentations can take root before there is an opportunity to measure the validity of allegations or assertions.  Such liars know the truth but deform and simulate it. [...] We live in a time when the bulk of our fellow citizens have been indoctrinated rather than educated.  Rather than learning facts — including relatively objective history — they are encouraged to think of themselves in terms of relationships to one another.  What is important to them is what is trending in digital social media and who the influencers of the moment are.  Status comes from horizontal acclaim.  Digital social networks have replaced real social networks.  This leads to a society adrift, with people desperate to have someone to guide them.  Mainstream news organizations and digital social media platform providers seek to fill this need.

US Media's Misleading Framing Of Atlanta Police Officer's Comments About Shooter Used In Chinese Propaganda.  American media's misleading framing of a police officer's description about why a man shot up multiple massage parlors in Atlanta was used by China's state-run media outlet Sunday [3/21/2021].  The Xinhua News Agency, the official state-run press agency of the People's Republic of China, repeated a misleading claim suggesting Cherokee County Sheriff Capt. Jay Baker made excuses for Robert Aaron Long, who stands accused of killing eight people in Atlanta.  The misleading claim suggested Baker told reporters — in his view — that it "was a really bad day for" Long.  "8 lives taken, 6 of them Asian.  And the killer was just 'having a bad day'!" Xinhua News Agency tweeted Sunday.

The mainstream media's anti-White racism is escalating.  [Scroll down]  The media's racial obsession is a way to maintain the Democrats' political power, by silencing the opposition, and to drive ratings.  Eventually, though, the real-world consequences are going to be disastrous.  If our children are consistently told that Whites are not just racist, but akin to the KKK or even Nazis, the means that waging war against them is within the pale of moral behavior.  I am deeply concerned that the media will incite someone — or a group of someones — to take up arms in the imaginary war against "White supremacists" and start targeting people based upon their skin color.

The Real Reasons Why Millions Of Americans Will Defy Covid Mandates And Vaccines.  I suspect a large portion of the public is at least partially aware when they are being pushed or lured into a specific way of thinking. [...] The media does not objectively report facts and evidence, it spins information to plant an engineered narrative in the minds of its viewers.  But the public is not as stupid as they seem to think.  This is probably why trust in the media has plunged by 46% in the past ten years, hitting an all time low this year of 27%.  Except for pre-election season spikes, mainstream outlets from CNN to Fox to CBS to MSNBC are facing dismal audience numbers, with only around 2 million to 3 million prime time viewers.  There are numerous YouTube commentators with bigger audiences than this.  And, if you sift through the debris of MSM videos on YouTube, you'll find low hits and a majority of people that are visiting their channels just to make fun of them.

Numerous Liberal Outlets Claimed to Independently Verify Debunked WaPo Story.  Shocker: the media lied to the American public once again.  We learned recently that the Washington Post, after claiming to have verified a story from anonymous sources, did no such thing for one particular "bombshell" story.  The Post initially reported in January that Trump told an official working in Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger's office to "find the fraud" in the state, telling them that they would be a national hero if she did.  The call took place on December 23rd, and was just released, proving that Trump never said that.  In reality, Trump said that this unnamed official would be praised when the "right answer comes out" and encouraged them to examine mail-in ballots in Fulton county.  The recording was discovered in this unnamed official's computer trash bin after they said they didn't think a recording existed.  Without their gross incompetence in what appears to be them trying to cover her tracks, this bogus reporting would've never been exposed.

5 Other Totally Bogus Stories Designed To Hurt Trump The Media Got Away With.  The correction by The Washington Post concerning false information about a phone call between former President Donald Trump and the Georgia secretary of state's chief investigator is no anomaly.  The neglect of truth and preference for anonymous sources is deeply ingrained in the corrupt left-wing media's strategy.  "You will notice that establishment media errors, omissions, mistakes, and outright lies always slant one way — against me and against Republicans.  Meanwhile, stories that hurt Democrats or undermine their narratives are buried, ignored, or delayed until they can do the least harm," Trump said in a statement Monday in response to widespread corrections from The New York Times, CNN, ABC, and so on.  The Washington Post correction struck right to the core of why journalism is dying and has been for years, and it served as a reminder of the media's lack of ethics and standards throughout the Russian collusion scramble.  Here are five major Trump-Russia stories the media botched. [...]

The Media Lied about Brian Sicknick's Death.  Remember how we were told, shortly after the mass trespass at the Capitol, that 5 people had died because of the "act of sedition" or "coup" and that all Trump supporters were responsible for their deaths?  I do.  In any case, it turned out that that information was, at best, partially true.  In regard to Brian Sicknick, the police officer who sadly died that day, it was absolutely untrue.  For one, the only person actually killed on Jan. 6 was Ashli Babbitt, an Air Force veteran who was shot in the neck by an LEO for crawling though a window.  She was unarmed and not doing anything violent.  The other three people who died died of "medical emergencies," whatever that means, not injuries sustained during the day's events.  And that leaves Brian Sicknick, the police officer who sadly died on Jan. 6.  The problem is that, while Democrats blamed Trump supporters for his death and even let his body lie in state, there's no evidence that he died because of anything protesters did.  In fact, despite the media preaching for months that he died after being bludgeoned to death with a fire extinguisher, that appears to be entirely untrue.

Audio That Debunked Fraudulent Trump Quotes [was] Found On GA State Government Device:  Report.  An audio recording that forced multiple major news outlets to issue corrections to stories that attributed fraudulent quotes to former President Donald Trump was reportedly found on the device of the chief investigator of the Georgia secretary of state's office.  Trump made a call to the chief investigator, Frances Watson, on Dec. 23 to discuss alleged fraud in the 2020 election, asking her to look into votes cast in Fulton County, Georgia, especially.  Reports of the call published the next month by The Washington Post, CNN, and others quoted Trump as telling Watson to "find the fraud" and claiming she would be a "national hero" if she did.  An audio recording of the call published last week showed that Trump made neither statement, debunking news outlets' claims that were sourced back to a single anonymous source.  The recording of the call was obtained through an open records request to the Georgia secretary of state's office.  Officials reportedly located the file in a trash folder on Watson's device, according to CNN.

Audio shows the media got the Trump-Georgia story all wrong.  It's one thing if a single news outlet publishes a fraudulent anonymously sourced "scoop."  It's another thing entirely if multiple newsrooms claim they independently "confirmed" the fraudulent "scoop" with anonymous sources of their own.  The former can reasonably be explained away as a simple error; the latter is not so simple.  It's unrealistic so many sources would be wrong about the same thing.  It's more likely competing news outlets spoke with the same anonymous individual or individuals, which leads to uncomfortable questions about whether the media were merely fed bad information or were intentionally manipulated. [...] If you can believe it, the Washington Post bungling its "bombshell" report isn't the most scandalous thing about this episode in media malfeasance.  No, the most scandalous thing is:  Several newsrooms claimed they independently "confirmed" the most [condemnatory] details of the Washington Post's since-corrected "scoop."

If This Week You Learned Biden is 'Hopeful' And Tucker Carlson Is Evil, Congratulations, You've Been Lied To.  If you hadn't watched the president's prime-time address, you might think it was something — anything — other than the most depressing, defeated, and resigned speech since President Jimmy Carter held the office.  You might think he hadn't devoted his third sentence to a baseless attack on his predecessor, and the entire rest of his address to death, sadness, loneliness, and despair.  You might think he hadn't literally threatened the American people, warning, "We may have to reinstate restrictions to get back on track, please, we don't want to do that again."  Rather, to read The Washington Post homepage's featured commentary on the address, you'd think "Much of that speech was about hope."  "It was about seeing a shaft of light at the end of a dark horror," Robin Givhan, a 56-year-old woman who once won a Pulitzer for "witty, closely observed essays that transform fashion criticism into cultural criticism," wrote.  "His white French cuffs and his crisp pocket square," she went to tell us, "evoked all of the institutional power and authority at his disposal to make things better."  "[H]is mere presence on television," she insisted, was a declaration of "his pride in the country's progress."  If you're wondering why you didn't see any of this, don't worry:  It didn't happen.

Another Opinion Columnist Pushing War With Iran Who Doesn't Actually Exist.  There is at least one more foreign policy opinion writer from the Mujahideen-eKhalq (MEK) whose existence is dubious, based on a study by a social media analyst and statements from a defector from the group.  Amir Basiri, who contributed to Forbes 9 times, the Washington Examiner 52 times, OpenDemocracy, Algemeiner, and The Hill once also appears to be a fabrication.  The MEK is an Iranian exile group for which John Bolton, Rudy Giuliani, and other foreign policy luminaries have given paid speeches.  Dems like Joe Lieberman and Howard Dean have also spoken on their behalf.  But the group has American blood on its hands, has been accused of practicing forced sterilization, and their belief system has been described as a mixture of Marxism and Islamism.  Its supporters claim they, and their front group the National Council of Resistance of Iran, are a sort of government-in-exile, despite nearly nonexistent support for the group within Iran.  They also have waged a substantial disinformation campaign in the Western press, in particular targeting conservative media.

When Minorities Vote GOP, the Media Smears Republicans as Racists.  In just one week, the Washington Post churned out two op-eds on the same theme, "The GOP is Now Just the Party of White Grievance" and "The Republican Party is Making Jim Crow Segregationists Proud".  The D.C. Democrat paper doesn't bother clarifying why Democrats from two generations ago would be thrilled that 1 in 5 black men voted for President Trump.  Ever since the election, the media has been beating its narrative drum with one message.  CNN howls that Republicans are the worst racists.  The New York Times insists they're even more racist than that.  And MSNBC will counter that only white racists would vote Republican.

So where are the nightly network news pictures of all the 'kids in cages'?  The media posted fake news stories with "kids in cages" pictures dating the Obama/Biden years in their four-year collusion with Democrats to destroy President Trump.  So where are the nightly televised pictures today of kids sleeping on cement floors in crowded facilities?  Somehow, we do not see them. [...] Where's Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, who went down for a photo-op wearing white, in order to weep in front of an empty parking lot, and compare illegal immigrant detentions during the Trump administration to Nazi concentration camps?  Where is the Hollywood crowd who have always protested Trump's actions?  I must assume none of them really cared and it was always a political attack or else they would be actively protesting.  The Biden administration also clearly doesn't care about how contagious the coronavirus, which migrants are bringing in with them, is.  They are not quarantining the migrant kids who are sick or the kids who have had contact with other sick people.  Nope, they are crowding them into jail-like facilities and then sending them around the U.S. to expose others.

The Roots of Insurrection:  Antifa Exposed.  The mainstream media — silent on the Marxist ideology, violence, and militancy of groups like Antifa and Black Lives Matter (BLM) — deceptively reported that the protests they inflicted on over 200 U.S. cities in 2020 were "mostly peaceful."  It deceitfully transformed the mayhem into a "summer of love."  Widespread rioting, looting, arson, murder, assaults, and destruction of property and businesses went unreported.  Such abject failure explains why polls consistently rank the media among America's least trusted institutions.  Given media complicity with radical groups, it's not surprising that the Los Angeles Times dismissed Andy Ngo's Unmasked:  Inside Antifa's Radical Plan to Destroy Democracy as unserious, "supremely dishonest," and "self-serving." [...] It says he's fixated on the "imaginary threat of Antifa" and ignores the "real danger" from far-right extremists.

How the Media Distorts Debate and Details of HR 1.  A piece of legislation working its way through Congress would upend further the way Americans conduct elections.  But the way many media outlets are covering it, one would think the bill — which Democrats designated as HR 1 or the so-called For the People Act — is just a simple, uncontroversial "reform" that most Americans agree with.  It's far from that. [...] For instance, media outlets frequently portray HR 1 as a "voter rights" bill.  Outlet after outlet describes the legislation this way, despite vagueness about exactly what voting rights are being threatened. [...] Are Americans really uniformly in favor of effectively nullifying state voter ID laws, or handing over all power for overseeing elections to an increasingly partisan federal agency?  As studies have shown, voter ID laws don't appear to affect minority voter turnout at all.  So why is that election integrity measure considered voter suppression?  It looks like HR 1 has nothing to do with protecting voter rights and everything to do with manipulating and nationalizing how we conduct elections.

Things that don't make sense, except to Democrats.  [Scroll down]  Now that cases, deaths, and hospitalizations are declining rapidly we see fewer stories.  They have to get the $1.9 Trillion leftist slush fund passed before the public is allowed to learn the truth.  I also am seeing frequent reporting complaining that not as many people are getting tested.  The media, bureaucrats and other Democrats should be cheering that fewer people are scared and fewer people feel the need to get tested but they are complaining.  The cheers should be very loud because even with fewer people testing, the positivity rate has dropped rapidly.  It's as if the media and other Democrats would rather keep destroying the economy and children instead of getting schools and businesses open.  The cheerleading and campaigning for Democrats is what reporters do.  How is that valuable to the American people?

Correcting the Biden Administration's Lies About the Border Crisis.  What is happening right now on the border and within the United States regarding illegal immigration is being misrepresented by the Biden administration and much of the media.  Most nightly television broadcasts do not even mention the chaos on the border, what is causing it and what the government is doing in response.  When they do, they merely copy the administration's talking points that are inaccurate and misleading.

Developing some perspective on the Capitol riot.  In the last few days we've seen a series of hearings in the House and Senate on the January 6 riot at the Capitol.  After all the talk, we still don't know some of the basic facts of the riot, especially the circumstances surrounding the death of Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick, the only law enforcement officer and only non-rioter to die in the violence.  But in spite of the gaps in our knowledge, a sense of perspective on the riot — Who was involved?  What did they think they were doing? — has begun to emerge.  First, the riot is often referred to as an "armed insurrection." A search of the Nexis database of newspapers, websites, and cable news transcripts finds 2,339 times since January 6 in which the riot was described as an "armed insurrection."  On many other occasions, the rioters were described simply as "armed."  But the description requires an asterisk that is rarely, if ever, applied.  A small number of the rioters did indeed have baseball bats or bear spray, and a few used flagsticks or even, in one case, a crutch as weapons to assault Capitol police.  But the armed insurrectionists did not use any firearms.

Ron Johnson Gets FBI to Admit That No Firearms Were Seized During the Capitol Riot.  Ever since the riot in the US Capitol on January 6, we have struggled to find out exactly what happened there.  As time goes on, we are finding that just about everything we were told about that event is false.  We know, for instance, that one of the rioters, the one who took the video of the execution of Ashli Babbitt, was on the payroll of CNN and NBC, see ["]Leftist Videographer John Sullivan Was Paid by Major Media Organizations for Footage of the Capitol Unrest["].  We know that Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick was not beaten to death, and we also know that nearly two months after his death, the FBI still refuses to give a cause of death or charge anyone with a crime, see ["]FBI Director Wray Is Asked About Brian Sicknick's Cause of Death, His Response Is Just Not Acceptable["].  We know there were no "kill teams" looking for Mike Pence or anyone else.  We know the guys with zip ties picked them up from where Capitol Police dropped them.  We have yet to see any evidence that any member of Congress or senator aided the rioters.

Attack of the Woke Teen Career Killers.  [Scroll down]  This is why newspapers can't be trusted anymore.  Reporters need to have a normal person's understanding of what words mean, so they can get on with the story.  If a field is described as "barren," we don't need to know the precise size, type and amount of vegetation per square foot.  But if we find out that by "barren," reporters mean "lush," then every word becomes suspect, and we're going to need six paragraphs detailing the precise amount of greenery in the field.  Not one word they use can be believed.  More to the point, if reporters call someone a "white supremacist," we need to know if the Times' definition of "white supremacist" includes a person who:
  ·   questions race preferences in hiring and college admissions;
  ·   believes most people are in prison because they committed crimes; or
  ·   admires Western culture.
[...] These sourpuss zealots are in such a mad race to show their wokeness, they are useless as conduits for the news.  What they do isn't "reporting."  It's terrorism.

The Great Hacking of Vermont's Electrical Grid That Never Happened.  Prominent media critics keep insisting that inaccurate reports from prominent institutions are completely different from the made-up "fake news" found on Facebook and other social media networks.  But do news consumers see them as completely different?  The net effect is the same: something that is not true gets communicated far and wide, and the correct information is spread on a much smaller scale.  A new poll found 52 percent of Democrats believe Russia "tampered with the vote tallies" to make Trump the winner in the presidential race.  There is no evidence of this.  When the big-name media institutions and elected Democratic officials twist the news to the point of falsehood, it's not surprising that so many of the rank-and-file would believe something that isn't true.

Lying About Obama.  Jack Cashill has written over a dozen books, including two about the mysterious 1996 explosion of TWA Flight 800, one about the Trayvon Martin case, and two — now three — about Barack Obama.  His new book, Unmasking Obama:  The Fight to Tell the True Story of a Failed Presidency, is a definitive account not only of Obama's eight years in office but also of the transformation of most mainstream American political journalists, largely during the Obama era, from relatively objective reporters of the facts — emphasis on "relatively" — to dedicated partisans of the left, ready and eager at every turn to cover up unpleasant truths (however important) about Democrats and to promote outrageous lies (however destructive) about Republicans.  Fortunately, in the age of the Internet, the mainstream media have competition.

A culture of lies.  Almost everything you are being told to believe by the mainstream media is a lie.  The legacy media has long since chosen sides and will brazenly cover up anything that could reflect poorly on Democrats, yet will assiduously traffic in any and all innuendo, hearsay, and slander that they feel will harm Republicans/conservatives/Trump supporters.  They gleefully promulgate prevarication in their unending quest to damage Democrats' political opponents.

How many people would still be alive today without media COVID malpractice?  If there's one thing we've learned from the COVID-19 lockdowns, it's that the mainstream media duped us time and again.  Not surprisingly, trust in the Fourth Estate is at an all-time low.  According to Axios, nearly 60 percent of Americans agree with the statement that "journalists and reporters are purposely trying to mislead people by saying things they know are false or gross exaggerations."

What a Reporter's Arrest at a BLM Riot Tells Us About the Media.  [Scroll down]  While working for the Des Moines Register, [Andrea] Sahouri had repeatedly covered publicity stunts by Rep. Ako Abdul-Samad.  Even after her arrest, the paper continued to use Sahouri to cover the protests and Samad, including glamorizing the arrest of a BLM organizer busted over the vandalism of a cop car.  There's a basic conflict in having an activist, especially one that has a history with a hate group, covering a cause she's passionate about, especially after she's been arrested.  The Des Moines Register has gone on insisting that Sahouri is a journalist who was wrongly arrested.  But Robnett, her fellow activist and boyfriend, isn't a journalist.  He appears to work in marketing.  Journalists don't bring their boyfriends along to a rally unless they're there to take part in the event.  During the BLM riots, leftist members of the media frequently blurred the line between activism and journalism.  But Sahouri may be one of the more egregious examples.  The Register, Amnesty International, and other left-wing organizations continue to attack the police, but have refused to ask basic questions about Sahouri's extremist background.  Or why she was arrested, along with her boyfriend, while another Register reporter wasn't.

Brainwashing Achieved!  Democrat Voters Overwhelmingly Believe "Trump Supporters" Are The #1 Problem In The Country.  The #1 goal of the liberal media ever since Trump came down the escalator in June of 2015 was to smear his supporters as "racists, bigots, sexist, deplorable scum of the earth".  In early 2021, they added "domestic terrorist" to the list.  Sadly, according to a brand new poll, the media smear campaign has proved to be effective.  A new poll from Echelon Insights shows that the #1 "concern" for Democrat voters is "Trump supporters".  Yes, really.  Not police brutality, gun violence, healthcare, student debt, or 7 of the other items they were asked about.  Trump supporters. [...] The media makes the money machine churn when they can divide the people, and the results of this poll show they are doing an exceptional job.

Why The Texas Blackout Has The Greens So Scared:  Deflecting blame to a more exciting apocalypse.  Within days, most of the country was seeing "with our own eyes" and feeling "in our bones" a cold wave so severe that five million people lost electricity and, in a special irony, nearly half of the ballyhooed wind turbines in Texas, which had risen to supply 23% of her energy, were left frozen (and inoperable).  This constituted a double whammy to the huge global warming establishment.  First was the cold, when the "science" had confidently predicted a steadily warming Texas.  Second was the failure of renewables, vastly exacerbating the problems for the energy grid.  Within hours the mainstream media had risen to the challenge.  Journalists employed their familiar word games, quickly substituting "climate change" for global warming.  Readers might be a tad confused if they read "The brutal cold striking Texas is emblematic of a world facing more unpredictable weather due to the rising impact of global warming" but substitute "climate change" for the last two words and presto, the sentence works.  To be sure, that's only because "climate change" is a meaningless term.

Exposing Fact-Checker "Mistruths" on 2020 Election Lawsuits.  Virtually all "fact-checkers" are members of the Democrat-media complex.  They are an important component of the Left's political tactics seeking to discredit contrarian voices they deem not to be "politically correct" and undermining dissent on Democrat agendas.  Not surprisingly, "fact-checking" has nothing to do with checking the facts, but rather is a tactic to discredit material that effectively undermines the Democrat-media narrative.  A good example is Snopes: [...] Snopes is not alone in their leftwing bias.  The same bias applies to the "fact-checkers" at Politifact, Facebook, Twitter, Washington Post, and other media-connected checkers and supposed ombudsmen.  All are supposedly affiliated with the Poynter Institute for Media Studies' International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN), but they routinely and blatantly violate the number 1 principle of ICFN:  a commitment to nonpartisanship and fairness.  Nothing could be further from the truth.

The mainstream media's quandary ... and panic.  [Scroll down]  When mainstream press isn't covering up information that is damaging to the progressives cause, it fabricates stories against conservatives like the Russian collusion hoax or reporting that the riot in the Capital on Jan. 6 was an insurrection led by Donald Trump.  Both of these stories were lies from start to finish.  But both lead to poisoning the minds of countless Americans against the president and two impeachments against him.  Yet during the summer of 2020, the press presented the Antifa and BLM riots as mostly peaceful demonstrations.

Everything is Fake in Utopia.  When Democrats gain power through fraud, everything that follows becomes fake as well. [...] When deception is normalized, tech giants can routinely conceal Biden's unpopularity.  On Biden's campaign trail, mass manipulators scripted questions for audience members to ask him.  Not even a month into office, the phony administration requested its media allies brief them on questions they intend to ask.  White House press conferences will still be theatre, but Jim Acosta will no longer have a part.  Our fraud-in-chief was filmed repeating "salute the marines" after someone likely relayed the command to him through an earpiece.  If you ask the fraudsters, Biden actually said "good-looking marines," and we all misheard him.  We're supposed to believe that Biden complimenting the looks of male marines is more sensical than a party of manipulators secretly telling a senile puppet what to do.  I'll take door number two.  When everything is fake, Joe Biden is a "devout Christian" who supports abortion, Black Lives Matter, and the most radical factions of the LGBTQ lobby.  It doesn't matter that these movements are antithetical to Christianity because fake is the new normal.

Boycott the Gaslight Media and Save America.  There is one major lesson that conservatives and frankly all Americans must learn:  never accept at face value the reporting of any news event.  By foolishly acquiescing to the version of a story put out by the denizens of the mainstream media, the citizenry allows the ruling oligarchy to set the narrative and exploit the inevitably fabricated incidents that further their cause.  In place of "mainstream media," they ought to be called Gaslight Media, for their role is not to report the truth, but rather to manipulate the public into a mental state conducive to obedience. [...] These statists are aware that once their version of a story has been repeated ad nauseum for days or weeks the bulk of the populace will accept it as the truth, thus, achieving near-permanent status in the national discourse.

The False and Exaggerated Claims Still Being Spread About the Capitol Riot.  What took place at the Capitol on January 6 was undoubtedly a politically motivated riot.  As such, it should not be controversial to regard it as a dangerous episode.  Any time force or violence is introduced into what ought to be the peaceful resolution of political conflicts, it should be lamented and condemned.  But none of that justifies lying about what happened that day, especially by the news media.  Condemning that riot does not allow, let alone require, echoing false claims in order to render the event more menacing and serious than it actually was.  There is no circumstance or motive that justifies the dissemination of false claims by journalists.  The more consequential the event, the less justified, and more harmful, serial journalistic falsehoods are.  Yet this is exactly what has happened, and continues to happen, since that riot almost seven weeks ago.

The Media Has Been Lying About The Capitol Protests.  Look up any story about the storming of the Capitol by Donald Trump supporters, and you will find it described as a "deadly riot" that killed five people.  Worse still, one of the deaths was that a police officer who — the story goes — was killed by rioters after getting hit in the head by a fire extinguisher.  Then there is the story of the protestor who "carried Zip Ties into the Capitol," which led to accusations that the protestors intended to take hostages.  There have also been endless media descriptions of the event as an "armed insurrection."  And there were stories claiming that, as Reuters put it, "Capitol rioters meant to 'capture and assassinate' officials."  What is common about all of these media-fed narratives?  Not one of them is true.

The False and Exaggerated Claims Still Being Spread About the Capitol Riot.  What took place at the Capitol on January 6 was undoubtedly a politically motivated riot.  As such, it should not be controversial to regard it as a dangerous episode.  Any time force or violence is introduced into what ought to be the peaceful resolution of political conflicts, it should be lamented and condemned.  But none of that justifies lying about what happened that day, especially by the news media.  Condemning that riot does not allow, let alone require, echoing false claims in order to render the event more menacing and serious than it actually was.  There is no circumstance or motive that justifies the dissemination of false claims by journalists.  The more consequential the event, the less justified, and more harmful, serial journalistic falsehoods are.  Yet this is exactly what has happened, and continues to happen, since that riot almost seven weeks ago.  And anyone who tries to correct these falsehoods is instantly attacked with the cynical accusation that if you want only truthful reporting about what happened, then you're trying to "minimize" what happened and are likely an apologist for if not a full-fledged supporter of the protesters themselves.

The Impeachment Show.  Lost in the tedium and general lack of interest in the impeachment show put on by the Democrats last week is the general weirdness of our ruling class.  What we see in politics and in the media is presented as if it is completely normal.  No one ever points out the facts or the contradictions with reality.  The presenters and their subjects are all super-serious, as if everything they are saying and doing is completely normal.  The reaction to the very peaceful demonstrations by Trump fans last month is a great example of this weird disconnect.  We live in an age where everything is monitored by millions of mobile-phone cameras.  As a result, everyone got to see hours of amateur video shot during the subdued protests in Washington back in January.  Yet the carrying-on by the politicians and media is disconnected from what we saw online.  If you are a left-wing partisan, all of it confirms your belief that Trump is a magical orange Hitler commanding an invisible army of Hitlers.  Of course, for these people, everything confirms this belief.  They are insane.

NYT Retracts Story First Published on Jan. 8 That Capitol Hill Police Officer Was Killed by a Fire Extinguisher Thrown by Protesters.  Wow, what coincidental timing.  The story claiming that a police officer was murdered by Trump supporters during the Capitol Hill protest on January 6 is, for all practical purposes, retracted by the NYT the day after Pres.  Trump is acquitted on the impeachment charge of having instigated those protests — which were declared by Democrats and the media an "insurrection" against the government. [...] Julie Strong at American Greatness has been aggressively pursuing this story for weeks, and two days ago she published a column that noted efforts by media outlets — including the NYT — to slowly back away from narrative created by the early reporting done by the NYT and acknowledging that the cause of Sicknick's death was still undetermined.  The narrative built around that early reporting was that he was struck by a demonstrator wielding a fire extinguisher — a narrative advanced by both liberal and conservative media outlets in their effort to railroad Donald Trump over the past 5 weeks.  That narrative has now unraveled because there simply is no evidence to support the claim that the fire extinguisher episode actually happened.

The 'Insurrection Hallucination' and How We Got There.  It's no secret the media has lots of ways to gaslight you.  One of those is failing to report significant happenings.  Another is booking and quoting people whose views they want to advance because they target those they dislike.  Yet another is spreading outright lies, like the contrafactual assertions that Antifa-BLM riots around the country for the past four years were "mostly peaceful" or that President Trump wanted people to inject bleach to kill the spreading virus.  This week, despite their best efforts, a lot of those lies and liars have been unmasked.

The Times' Superspreader Lie About Officer Sicknick.  Like so many fabricated storylines intended to damage Donald Trump and his supporters, the New York Times cited anonymous sources to support a shocking claim in an article alleging Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick was murdered by a Trump "insurrectionist" on January 6.  "[P]ro-Trump rioters attacked that citadel of democracy, overpowered Mr. Sicknick, 42, and struck him in the head with a fire extinguisher, according to two law enforcement officials," Times reporters claimed January 8, the day after Sicknick died.  "With a bloody gash in his head, Mr. Sicknick was rushed to the hospital and placed on life support.  He died on Thursday evening."  That horrifying account quickly made its way into the vernacular of journalists, lawmakers, political pundits, and regular Americans without dispute.  CNN, as Raheem Kassam detailed here, for weeks repeated the line as fact.  Ditto for MSNBC.  In a tirade earlier this week, "Morning Joe" host Joe Scarborough called Donald Trump a "cop killer" and raged that GOP Senators wouldn't vote to convict. [...] But the narrative about what happened to Sicknick is quickly unraveling, as I wrote earlier this week.  Not only is CNN, the network that helped perpetuate the initial storyline for more than a month, questioning the circumstances about Sicknick's death, so too is the New York Times.

Our Tarnished Institutions and the Boy Who Cried Wolf.  The only bright side to this situation is that the people now cannot ignore the lies being pumped out by what we thought were our institutions.  We can thank Trump for that.  He said what he would do, and then did it.  The contrast to business-as-usual was stunning and refreshing.  We liked it and wanted more of it.  Which the swamp could not allow.  Russia!  Russia!  Russia!  Ukraine!  Impeachment!  Systemic racism!  BLM!  Pandemic!  Insurrection!  Is there a previously-trusted institution which hasn't cried wolf about the bad orange man in the last four years?

Tucker Carlson Lays out Some Uncomfortable Questions About the Capitol Riot.  Recently, RedState reported on a CNN article that included a very interesting passage regarding the death of Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick, who passed sometime after the Capitol riot on January 6th.  Though a story that he had been beaten to death by a fire extinguisher had spread far and wide in the media, it turns out that an investigation found no signs of trauma on his body, nor have investigators been able to find any video of him sustaining wounds that could have taken his life.  The latest theory by investigators is that he may have had a reaction to pepper spray being used that day, though that's purely speculation at this point. [...] One of the things Tucker talks about is the idea that five people died as a direct result of the riots, a statement that has been made more times than one can count by the news media.  In regards to what we actually know right now, he notes that one person died of what appears to have been a heart attack while on the phone with his wife.  Another man had a stroke, and there's no evidence he was even part of the riot that day.  Another woman died after passing out, possibly being trampled by the crowd as a result.  In other words, of the five people listed as dying that day due to the riots, three of them were unquestionably accidental.

Jake Tapper and Chris Hayes Lose Their Minds 'Inciting' Against GOP And Reveal Next Step to Control the Narrative.  [Scroll down]  The GOP got "hundred of thousands of Americans" killed?  When did that happen?  "Then helped a deadly attack on the Capitol."  No, as far as I know, the GOP denounced any violence and were themselves threatened with a bomb at the RNC.  No, actually there wasn't "unprecedented death" for a pandemic.  Unfortunately, there are deaths in a pandemic as there have been all over the world.  Had Trump not been in power, if Biden had been there, it would have been far worse.  Biden wouldn't have cut off travel with China and it would have been exponentially worse.  "Destruction and misery and mourning."  Yes, there was a lot of that from mostly Democratic lockdowns, where Democrats denied aid, as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi proved, until after the election, exacting the most harm to the economy believing it could adversely affect President Donald Trump.  There was also a lot of that during the BLM/Antifa riots that the Democrats not only failed to condemn, but actually embraced by donating to a rioter bail fund, supporting violent rioters over the people and the police being harmed, and attacking efforts to curtail the riots by law enforcement and the federal government.

Accurate List of 2020 Election Fraud Cases Shows 81 Cases Total, 30 Still Active.  We've heard over and over from Big Media that President Trump and his team lost numerous court cases linked to the 2020 election.  But this is not accurate.  Here's what we identified from our research of an accurate and updated list of court cases:
  •   There are 81 court cases to date based on the 2020 election
  •   In 45 cases President Trump was the plaintiff
  •   In 34 cases President Trump is not the plaintiff
  •   In 2 cases President Trump is the defendant
  •   In 72 cases illegal voting is alleged
  •   In ZERO of the 72 cases where illegal voting is alleged has evidence been allowed to be presented
  •   30 cases remain active

CNN Finally Acknowledges the Story Media Spread About Officer Sicknick's Cause of Death Isn't True.  Earlier this week, the body of Officer Brian Sicknick lay in state in the U.S. Capitol.  Everyone honored his life and service.  But the government is having trouble building a murder case there has still not been an official determination as to his cause of death.  After being part of the force during the actions at the Capitol on Jan. 6, he went back to his office.  Some hours later, he collapsed and then later died.  But what has been determined is that the story largely spread about his death, that he was hit by a fire extinguisher by protesters has been discounted, according to a CNN report, because they found no blunt force trauma to his body and there has been no evidence otherwise found, such as video or witnesses, that the incident even occurred.

Hit-job journalism misses the target again.  The hit-job interview is a staple of British journalism.  There is, I suppose, an obvious attraction to it: while it can destroy its subject, it can also make the career of a journalist.  And yet for the reader, listener or viewer, it can also be deeply boring — for the simple reason that if the journalist makes clear their conclusion from the outset, there's no chance of having a reasonable discussion.  People who agree with it rejoice, those who don't switch off.  Nothing gets learned; no ideas are properly discussed.  Such was the case with an interview published in last week's Sunday Times by the journalist Decca Aitkenhead.  Her subject was Professor Jordan Peterson, and, like everything to do with Peterson, the interview has kicked up a fair amount of fuss — principally because it was so mean and hostile.

Crucifying Jordan Peterson.  [Scroll down]  Emerging from this nightmare and prepared to step back onto the public stage, Peterson agreed to a major interview with Decca Aitkenhead for the Sunday Times of London.  The story appeared on January 31; on the same day, Peterson posted on YouTube a recording of the nearly three-hour Zoom conversations that he and his daughter, Mikhaila, had with Aitkenhead.  In the recording (which as of Wednesday had accumulated half a million hits), Peterson is friendly and forthcoming, but emotionally fragile as a consequence of his long torment; at one point he breaks into tears and has to step away from the microphone.  Mikhaila, for her part, spends an hour and a half telling Aitkenhead the full story of Peterson's illness, complete with vivid particulars.  And Aitkenhead poses throughout as entirely sympathetic, sounding more like a compassionate social worker than a journalist.  But — and this is why Peterson felt compelled to post the audio of the interview — Aitkenhead's piece for the Times proved to be a masterpiece of pure snideness and dishonesty.  She reduced Peterson's deep learning and richly nuanced wisdom about life to "bracing advice about how to be a real man."  She caricatured the multitudes of people whose lives he's helped to turn around as "young men who idolise him" as a "fantasy father figure."

The war on Jordan Peterson.  Leftist hatred for the Canadian psychology professor Jordan Peterson is really something to behold.  He stands as an example of what happens to someone who strays from the crazy line of thinking by modern campus bigots.  Mr. Peterson is the canary in the toxic coal mine of political correctness and petty thought police.  Let's start with the professor's crime.  Simply put, Mr. Peterson does not share the monolithic, prevailing liberal orthodoxy on university campuses dictating that Western White males are the world's evil oppressors and anyone who does not belong to that evil race is a victim trapped in circumstances beyond his or her control.

The 'Big Lie' And Big Liars.  There's a media-perpetrated myth that Joe Biden is a moderate; that he's an honest man.  He is not, and never has been.  He's a politician, a Democrat, who now has the authority of the United States government behind him.  The Big Lies are spread daily from the podium of the White House press briefing room.  Jen Psaki and her red hair have returned from a CNN contributor gig, and after disseminating lies for the Obama State Department, this "Ginger Goebbels" freely spouts whatever words fit their needs at the moment.  Unbound by reality or any challenge of the one they paint daily, even when it contradicts the one they painted the day before, the lies just keep getting bigger.  They inherited "no plan" for vaccine distribution?  Schools can't reopen unless billions are spent hiring more teachers when all data shows schools are safe?  But they're the "party of science"?  No lie is too small to tell, none too big to swallow, and none are or will be challenged.

Op-ed calls very real conservative censorship, purge a 'vapid new conspiracy theory' by Rupert Murdoch.  From the left's standpoint, claims that the 2020 presidential election — which was marred by millions of unsolicited mail-in ballots sent out because of the pandemic — was stolen is a "big lie," insisting there is "no evidence" to support the assertion.  Never mind that three out of four Republicans with eyes that can see believe it to be true — an anomaly dismissed as just a bunch of rubes being manipulated by former President Donald Trump.  This being the same cabal that insists conservatives are not being censored by Big Tech.  No, it's just more conspiracy-mongering on the right.  Just ask Mediaite founding editor Colby Hall, who said in op-ed that "there is a new dangerous conspiracy afoot, and it's being amplified by arguably the most important person in all of political media:  Fox Corporation chairman Rupert Murdoch."

Stop credulously calling China a 'people's republic'.  The effect of re-labeling is well known, and it is widely used by the politicians. [...] Oppressive regimes, aware of the power of labels, use them to their full advantage, and include positive labels right into the official names of their states.  Names like "United States" or the "Russian Federation" tell you little about those countries' political organization, but how about words like "democracy" or "republic"?  I started wondering, why do we in the West parrot those words even when they are manifestly misleading?  Is there really a "Peoples' Republic of China"?  In the huge geographic area so designated, people have zero input into how they are governed.  This is decided for them by the all-seeing, all-knowing, all-wise chairman of the Communist Party.  So why not call it — in the Western press at least — the "Communist Dictatorship of China"?

The Media Told Us a Violent Revolt Was Coming.  What Happened?  It is worth noting today that media outlets are reporting Joe Biden will serve his first full day as President of the United States, and no American cities are burning.  No one is calling for the end of the Republic.  America still stands. [...] We have been told conservatives were going to revolt, trying to overthrow a fairly elected incoming President.  Instead, what we saw yesterday was a peaceful transfer of power.  Alleged flyers calling for an armed protest never happened.  The protests at 50 state capitals never materialized.  It's like all these hyped-up mini-revolutions were never going to happen, but some people who are not conservatives needed for these events to happen to further their own agenda.  Let's get something straight:  The armed mob that attacked the Capitol building was not representative of the 75 million people who voted for Donald Trump in November.

Media trust hits new low.  For the first time ever, fewer than half of all Americans have trust in traditional media, according to data from Edelman's annual trust barometer shared exclusively with Axios.  Trust in social media has hit an all-time low of 27%.  56% of Americans agree with the statement that "Journalists and reporters are purposely trying to mislead people by saying things they know are false or gross exaggerations."  58% think that "most news organizations are more concerned with supporting an ideology or political position than with informing the public."  When Edelman re-polled Americans after the election, the figures had deteriorated even further, with 57% of Democrats trusting the media and only 18% of Republicans.

Trust In Media At All Time Low:  Majority Believe Reporters Purposefully Trying To Mislead People.  Each year, the American people seem to trust the media less and less.  This year's annual survey from Edelman shows trust in traditional media and social media are at all-time lows.  The annual trust barometer, shared exclusively with Axios, found fewer than half of Americans trust traditional media for the first time since the survey began.

GOP Leaders in D.C. Don't Represent 74 Million Trump Voters.  The media lie.  All the time.  They lied about former President Barack Obama's economy; they tried to make us believe the worst economy since the Great Depression was a great economy.  Then they lied about President Donald Trump's soaring economy.  They tried to make us believe the best economy in 50 years, maybe the best economy ever for middle-class Americans, was a bad economy.  They lied about the Black Lives Matter riots.  For months, we saw radical communists, Marxists and violent thugs riot, loot, burn, mug and murder while attacking police officers with bricks, pipes and Molotov cocktails.  They burned entire downtown business districts to the ground, such as those in Minneapolis and Kenosha, Wisconsin. [...] They killed over 30 people.  They caused over $2 billion in damage.  Yet liberal politicians and the liberal media ignored it all, or made believe it never happened, or made believe it was "peaceful," or encouraged it, or supported it.  In many cases, they did all of the above.

Media Lie About Supposed Capitol Hill Attacker, Here's the Real Story.  It's almost like the mainstream media want to raise the temperature and stoke unsubstantiated fear.  Actually, I'm pretty sure that's exactly what they want to do.  That was made apparent again today after a lie was trumpeted by several major media outlets before being shown to be mostly false.  I'm talking about the story that a man provided "fake" inauguration credentials while carrying 500 rounds of handgun ammunition on his person in an attempt to enter the Capitol area.  This was supposed to be proof of an elevated threat, with the assumption being that this guy was there to shoot the place up as a probable QAnon disciple.  The real story is way, way less exciting.

In today's America, the wise person willfully suspends belief.  Twenty years ago, I believed most of what came over the nation's airwaves.  Ten years ago, I was becoming quite the skeptic.  Today, after years of unrelenting attacks on the President, I don't believe any of it.  It's all lies, half-truths, and misinformation, designed to influence elections and steer the collective mentality toward accepting the loss of freedom, the loss of constitutional rights and, eventually, to embrace communist ideas and authoritarian policies.  I'm not sure when it all went south, but I think it was probably long before I first became aware that there was a problem.

Trump, supporters likened to Nazis, Saddam's Ba'ath Party in cable-news demonization duel.  President Trump and his supporters were likened to dictators, despots, terrorists, and genocidal maniacs this week by dueling cable news competitors and elected officials.  MSNBC viewers watched programming on Wednesday with analogies to the Ba'ath Party under Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein, while CNN's were warned about large amounts of "Nazis" and "Klan" members permeating the Republican Party.  The cable news punditry was punctuated by Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell of California likening Mr. Trump to the terrorist who orchestrated the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks — Osama bin Laden — during an interview with "PBS NewsHour."

Three crucial questions remain unanswered about Capitol siege.  One thing recent history has taught America is the first storyline of major tragedies or controversies is never the most accurate.  Americans were told by the Bush administration that they were sucker-punched by a surprise attack on 9/11 by terrorists, only to learn the CIA and FBI had significant advance evidence of the plot and its players and failed to connect the dots.  Susan Rice originally told the nation that the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi was carried out spontaneously by a mob angered by an anti-Muslim video.  The attack, it turned out, was pre-planned and carried out by an al-Qaeda-aligned terror group in Libya.  The country was assured Christopher Steele's dossier provided credible evidence of Donald Trump colluding with Russia, when in fact the CIA and FBI knew almost immediately it was uncorroborated and based in part on Russian disinformation.  And now just a week after the heinous and deadly siege of the U.S. Capitol, the final narrative of what actually happened is still being written, revised and unmasked.

We Need a New Media System.  Media firms work backward.  They first ask, "How does our target demographic want to understand what's just unfolded?" Then they pick both the words and the facts they want to emphasize.  It's why Fox News uses the term, "Pro-Trump protesters," while New York and The Atlantic use "Insurrectionists." [...] What happened last Wednesday was the apotheosis of the Hate Inc. era, when this audience-first model became the primary means of communicating facts to the population.  For a hundred reasons dating back to the mid-eighties, from the advent of the Internet to the development of the 24-hour news cycle to the end of the Fairness Doctrine and the Fox-led discovery that news can be sold as character-driven, episodic TV in the manner of soap operas, the concept of a "Just the facts" newscast designed to be consumed by everyone died out.

Is Truth Irrelevant?  It is amazing how many people seem to have discovered last Wednesday that riots are wrong — when many of those same people apparently had not noticed that when riots went on, for weeks or even months, in various cities across the country last year.  For too many people, especially in the media, what is right and wrong, true or false, depends on who it helps or hurts politically.  Too many media people who are supposed to be reporters act as if they are combatants in political wars.  Someone once said that, in a war, truth is the first casualty.  That has certainly been so in the media — and in much of academia as well.

Media Have Hypocritical Double Standard on Trump vs BLM Protests.  Wednesday was proof that how corporate media and Democrat politicians report and comment on acts of civil unrest depends upon who is engaged in the rioting.  Six months ago The New York Times, which has been described as the national "newspaper of record," made excuses for rioters who attempted to take over the federal courthouse in Portland, Oregon.  It reported that "the nightly assault on the federal courthouse has been part of a much wider peaceful resistance ... that began assembling nearly two months ago in the wake of George Floyd's death at the hands of the Minneapolis police."  The Times continued, "the aim, as it has been in other cities, was to assemble for sweeping police reform and racial justice."  Reporting on Wednesday's protest in Washington, D.C., The Times' "peaceful resistance" suddenly became a "mob."  Instead of "assembling," the protesters engaged in "rampage" and "chaos," incited by President Trump, which became a "part of his legacy."

Enough! There Was No Riot, Insurrection or "Storming!"  Enough!  Enough of the gaslighting by the press.  Enough of the gaslighting by the party of slavery, Jim Crow, the KKK, want, deprivation, envy and murder of the unborn in the womb.  Most especially, enough of their "Republican," enablers, who believe they can gain political favor or DC cocktail circuit invites, by promoting these blatant lies.  What is even more egregious, these lies have already become, "common knowledge." [...] Aside from a couple of bozos who broke a window to get in, I clearly saw Capitol Police opening doors for protestors to enter, while appearing to cordially chat with them as they strolled through the building.

Only In Your Imagination Was That An Attempted "Coup".  At no point yesterday was the American government at risk of being "overthrown," as members of Congress have laughably suggested.  Per usual, our guardians of consensus can't bring themselves to describe what unfolded with any degree of dispassion or calm.  Instead we're told by the incoming Senate Majority Leader, for example, that January 6, 2021 will now "live in infamy" right alongside December 7, 1941.  Elected officials issued emotional notices that they were "okay," like they had just narrowly avoided being crushed in an earthquake, or escaped the World Trade Center on 9/11.  This is made all the more odd because the only person upon whom lethal force was committed appears to have been a Trump-supporting woman who was shot point-blank in the throat by a Capitol Hill police officer.  She's now dead.  Congress was temporarily inconvenienced.  Journalists and pundits, glorying in their natural state — which is to peddle as much free-flowing hysteria as possible — eagerly invoke all the same rhetoric that they'd abhor in other circumstances on civil libertarian grounds.  "Domestic terrorism," "insurrection," and other such terms now being promoted by the corporate media will nicely advance the upcoming project of "making sure something like this never happens again."  Use your imagination as to what kind of remedial measures that will entail.

Things That Need to Be Said About Today's Chaos in D.C..  [Scroll down]  Secondly, it's fascinating that the media and Democrats have all of a sudden figured out that violence and rioting are wrong and should be condemned.  We all remember how for months last year they painted violent Antifa/BLM rioters and agitators as "peaceful protesters" even as businesses were looted and burned to the ground, entire city blocks were turned to ashes, federal courthouses and officers were attacked with incendiary devices, and neighborhoods were invaded.

Just What Were You Expecting?  [Scroll down]  Whether walking on the street or gathered on the Capitol steps, people were waving flags and as far as I could see, nobody was throwing punches.  Nobody was throwing bricks or Molotov cocktails.  In fact, one video clip I found very interesting, was one group of protestors who managed to gain entry to the Capitol Building, was walking/strolling through Statuary Hall, and they were all staying inside the velvet guide ropes running down the center!!  Nobody toppled any statues over or anything like that.  Surely not some "maddened mob" as the media kept hyping all afternoon long.  Here are some things that bother me.  First of all, the media.  The way they were hyping this, you would think there was an all out assault by heavily armed rioters, hell bent on killing everyone inside the building.  The media kept using the words, "shots fired," implying that the "mob" had shot somebody, maybe even a policeman.  Turns out, it was a Capitol policeman who shot an unarmed female protestor.

C-SPAN Brings Steve Scully Back After He Admitted To Lying About Debate-Related Incident.  C-SPAN announced on Tuesday that it is bringing back disgraced host Steve Scully effective immediately despite Scully's admission, last year, that he lied about a debate-related incident that unfolded on social media.  Last October, before the second presidential debate, Scully falsely claimed that he had been hacked after a tweet appeared on his Twitter account that solicited advice from Trump opponent Anthony Scaramucci about how to deal with President Donald Trump at the debate, which he was set to host.

Cosmopolitan now promotes obesity as 'healthy'.  After decades of promoting stick-thin, big-cleavage women as sexy, Cosmopolitan women's magazine has a new schtick:  Promoting obese women as healthy. [...] They use young women of course, whose bodies can probably resist many of the problems of obesity at first.  That's a deception, because obesity eventually accumulates in problems if it's not eventually gotten rid of.  But this isn't stopping Cosmo.  Its obesity-is-healthy claim is about as accurate as the other falsehoods going around — that men can become women, or that racism causes COVID.  It's fantasyland stuff, and coming more and more from the left.  So much for "following the science."

The media are lying about Trump's phone call with Raffensperger.  The mainstream media and Georgia's secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger, are utterly disgraceful, dishonest, and manipulative people.  Raffensperger released a private phone call that the media immediately claimed — falsely — showed Trump begging Raffensperger to fraudulently find enough votes for Trump to win.  In fact, Trump called Raffensperger to get him to stop obstructing the fraud investigation. [...] Here's what really happened on the phone call.  First, Trump wasn't the only person on the phone.  Also present were Mark Meadows, Mike Pompeo, and multiple attorneys.  There isn't the slightest chance that they would have allowed Trump to beg Raffensperger for illegal votes or to threaten him.  Second, contrary to what the media implied, Trump was not operating off the premise that he lost Georgia.  If that had been the case, it would indeed have been wrong for Trump to beg for Raffensperger to "find" votes for him.  Instead, Trump was operating from the assertion that he won Georgia.

Gallup Poll Shows Most Americans Share Trump's Lack of Trust in Honesty of Media.  One important public service President Donald Trump has performed for the American people has been to pull the veneer back and fully expose the incredible bias of the establishment media.  Only 28 percent of Americans surveyed by Gallup last month rated the honesty and ethical standards of journalists as either "very high" or "high."  Contrast that with police officers, who earned a combined 52 percent rating in those categories, down just 2 percentage points from 2019, despite the massive "defund the police" protests nationwide.

Biden is Not 'President-Elect' Until Congress Counts Electoral Votes on January 6, 2021.  Let us say it all together, "Joe Biden is not the president-elect."  Americans have been bombarded with fake news about Biden's status in the 2020 presidential election.  Facebook, Twitter, CNN, MSNBC, ABC, PBS have all declared Biden the winner.  But this is far from over.  We have reported on massive election fraud from multiple sources.  The media refuses to do so, therefore we must tell the truth.  [Video clip]

How to Steal an Election in Four Steps.  [Scroll down]  In truth, President Trump likely received between 74.5 million and 76.5 million votes, winning both the popular vote and the electoral vote handily.  The media reported none of this, except anecdotally as Republican griping.  They reported that Biden had won, and that he was the president-elect, though he was not because the count was still in progress.  Major broadcast media refused to carry important updates by the President of the United States and ridiculed anyone who questioned the integrity of the election:  Trump was a cry baby:  Giuliani was unbalanced; Sidney Powell was a conspiracy theorist.  When Fox News chose to ignore stark reality in favor of the lie (Tucker Carlson accused Powell — perhaps the most respected attorney in Washington — of making claims she could not substantiate) it lost a huge chunk of its viewership to Newsmax and OANN, networks on which the news is not scripted in advance.  The Left went into, "Why can we all just get along" mode.  "A time for healing," said the newspapers.  They defended mail-in voting, the count stoppages, Dominion software, etc.  Evidence did not matter to them, only selling the narrative that Biden was the victor.  They enlisted the help of Trump-hating Republicans like Mitt Romney, Chris Christi, and Paul Ryan to implore Trump, the overwhelming winner, to concede.

5 Reasons Why You're Not Crazy to Question the Election Results.  You've gotten the memo from the leftist chin-strokers on social media.  It's simple.  You're insane for questioning the 2020 presidential election result.  Joe Biden is the president-elect, so you just run along and ignore the copious news stories about election fraud and get over it.  Man up!  Political titans on Capitol Hill look visibly concerned when asked by MSM reporters about the president and his millions of voters who aren't convinced that this election wasn't filled with fraud.  The party of Governor Stacey Abrams, President Hillary Clinton, and "Joe Biden should not concede under any circumstances" dares to point the magenta cat-toy-feather-wand of shame at Republicans who can't believe that the candidate with the most momentum and the power of the incumbency didn't win.  You're not wrong.  And you're not crazy.

The Trump-Hating Media Prepare For A Long Nap Under Biden.  [Scroll down]  The national media are, by virtually any recognized metric, now collectively far to the left on the political spectrum.  They hate Trump, capitalism, America's history and culture, and all the blue-collar, hard-working, tax-paying schlubs out there who make it all possible.  The media began the year in COVID-19 denial, pretending, along with leading Democrats, that the fast-spreading virus was nothing to worry about.  They quickly did an about-face after realizing that virus could be weaponized politically against Trump.  Since then, Americans have been subjected to non-stop propaganda on everything from vaccines and hydroxychloroquine to lockdowns and mandatory masks.  The goal:  weaken Trump, and turn Americans into terrified "yes" people, subservient to bureaucrat-scientists such as Anthony Fauci.  That's what's also behind the media campaign to blame Trump, not the communist Chinese, for the novel coronavirus.  No sooner had the virus emerged than the media were reporting that Trump had "slashed" Centers for Disease Control spending, implying he had left us vulnerable.  Wrong.  His budgets increased CDC spending every year.

This Tennessee Data for Masked vs. Unmasked Counties Would Be on Every Front Page, if the Results Were Different.  As you may have heard, we've sort of got a "casedemic" problem here in Tennessee.  That means lots and lots (and lots) of people are testing positive for COVID-19.  That's about all we know for sure, of course.  Nevertheless, hand-wringing from media, politicians, and local 'health authorities' is seemingly neverending, as are local reporters in my neck of the woods being filmed standing in front of that FEMA body truck they don't bother to tell us has been sitting in front of the regional hospital, unused, SINCE MARCH.  Hospitals aren't overwhelmed by any measure, and even the death toll isn't really all that impressive either considering that Tennessee is actually below the national average in deaths per million and most people who are dying are either already super old or super sick.  Indeed, while COVID does tragically hit some people hard, most 'cases' are quite mild and often non-symptomatic, driven by panic at every sniffle or people being forced to test for work and other reasons.  And there is increasingly solid evidence that not everyone counted as a 'COVID death' is really a death caused by COVID, but rather someone who had a positive PCR test at some point in 2020 before dying.  When you have a highly contagious respiratory virus going around, particularly one that is seasonal and seems to be boxing out the flu, an increasing percentage of those who die will likely have it.  These 'scary' numbers lie at the root of the ongoing panic and give continued justification for our overlords to continue to exercise control over society.

Soviet-Style Media Propaganda in America.  Pick a theme from the last four years:  Trump-Russia collusion, Trump has told a bazillion lies, Trump is an authoritarian, Trump will get us into a war with North Korea, it's impossible for Trump to get a vaccine by the end of the year.  Yada yada yada.  All of these things and more — including themes that have nothing whatsoever to do with Trump — were flatly untrue.  Which, in a society where the media is honest, would have been reported by that media.  A real media this minute would be investigating the results of the 2020 election and whether or not the President and his supporters are correct that there was indeed at least some election fraud.  But, of course, that's not what the media is doing.  They simply ignore the evidence, repeatedly label the very idea of voter fraud "baseless" — and move on.

Mike Pompeo slams reporter over coverage of wife's alleged COVID diagnosis.  Secretary of State Mike Pompeo is slamming a reporter over the handling of coverage of his wife's alleged COVID-19 diagnosis.  In a series of tweets Thursday, the nation's top diplomat refuted a now-deleted post which claimed that he and wife Susan Pompeo had attended a State Department holiday party one day before testing positive.  "My wife and I did not attend any State Department nor White House holiday parties — your statement is patently FALSE," Pompeo wrote.  "This isn't journalism and it's worse than gossip — it's unethical and potentially unlawful.  Stay tuned."  After Bloomberg reporter Nicholas Wadhams took down the tweet, Pompeo posted a screenshot along with a message reading, "Good to see this tweet — with patently false information — was deleted.  I won't hold my breath for an apology."

Are Democrats In Trouble In 2022?  [Scroll down]  [W]hat Democrats like Adam Nagourney determinedly call "protests against police abuses" consist largely of arson, assault and looting.  Nothing says "I'm against police abuses" like looting a pharmacy, liquor store or jewelry store.  There is a reason why countless stores in urban areas were boarded up, and in many cases remain boarded up, and the reason isn't that someone is "protesting against police abuses."  Further, Democrats in a number of cities, like Seattle, Portland, Chicago and Minneapolis, proved to be so sympathetic to rioters that they were unwilling to take effective measures to stop them.  Voters noticed.  One more thing:  Nagourney's statement that riots, looting and arson were "heavily covered on local television" is revealing.  The [New York] Times, the Washington Post, the Associated Press, the broadcast networks and other reliable Democratic outlets tried to suppress information about the riots that took place across the country, precisely so that such information would not damage the Democratic Party.  But they failed, mostly on account of local news coverage, which was less dedicated to the Democratic cause and more interested in letting viewers know what was going on.

Tainted Tallies Tell Tall Tales.  [Scroll down]  Speaking on an episode of War Room:  Pandemic, [Rudy] Giuliani asserted that the American people have not yet had the opportunity to examine evidence that appears to have corrupted some vote counts in key battleground states.  "Facts have been kept from them," Giuliani declared.  "Not a single court decision has had a hearing yet.  They haven't heard from a single witness.  They haven't looked at a single tape.  They haven't listened to a single recording.  There are thousands of them."  Amber Athey voiced the sentiments of many when she wrote, "The media has been claiming since the election ended that President Trump's claims of voter fraud are 'baseless' and 'without evidence'.  That just is not true.  The President's lawyer gave examples of [voter fraud.] ... But everyone is too busy mocking him to pay attention." [...] A December 2020 Fox News national survey of registered voters found that 68% of Republicans, 26% of independents, and 10% of Democrats believe that the election was stolen from Trump.

Print this article and save it before it goes down the Memory Hole.
Yes, It Was a Stolen Election.  As Americans continue to watch the 2020 election controversy unfold, the very same publications that spent years lying about President Trump's "Russia collusion" are once again telling us what we are dutifully supposed to believe.  The Los Angeles Times, for instance, assures us that Trump's "baseless" and "dangerous" claim "that the election was rigged to benefit Joe Biden" has been thoroughly "debunked."  The New York Times proclaims that "Trump's false election fraud claims" are founded upon nothing more than a "torrent of falsehoods."  Sneering at "how Trump drove the lie that the election was stolen," The Washington Post mocks Republicans who "are still pretending that there was election fraud."  And CNN.com warns that "Trump's obsession with overturning the election" has now begun to spiral "out of control."  But so much for what the comic books have to say.  What follows is a compilation of vital facts that will demonstrate, to anyone interested in following the truth wherever it may lead, that the 2020 presidential election was indeed rife with fraud, and that Joe Biden, if he should in fact be sworn into office next month, will be an illegitimate president from the very start.

WaPo's excessively red Covid map
A thread on this viral map, which attempts to paint a very scary picture.  [D]epending on where you live, it is almost certain someone at your Thanksgiving gathering will have COVID.  Look at all that red!  But, the map has massive problems.  The map comes from the Washington Post, but it is based on the COVID-19 Event Risk Assessment Planning tool from GA Tech.  The goal of which is to show what the chances are of having a COVID positive person attend a gathering.  A worthwhile project. [...] This is the Washington Post map, side by side with the map from the actual data source.  Same map, but Wapo makes the "artistic" choice of making the reds much darker and scarier. [...] The larger problem lies at the bottom of the Wapo map.  It says the map "assumes actual case prevalence is 10 times as high as laboratory-confirmed case count."  This, for lack of a better word, is bonkers.


The Vaccine Naysayers Got It Wrong.  Today I'm reminded of the host of media experts who flogged the seriousness and reliability of the Steele dossier for months and years only to evaporate when we later learned that document wasn't reliable.  To his great credit, the Washington Post's Erik Wemple devoted 10 articles to tracking down some of the dossier's promoters and asking them how they felt about it in retrospect.  As I pointed out at the time, a lot of the journalists he spoke with had no comment.  People like MSNBC's Rachel Maddow, who made the dossier a key part of her program for years simply moved on to greener pastures.  There was zero price to pay for being so wrong for so long about something so important.  I'm reminded of that today because of this Twitter thread by Glenn Greenwald highlighted by Twitchy.  Greenwald points out that some of the same outlets flogging the the dossier were also confident that a vaccine by the end of the year was a pipe dream.  Stop and enjoy the smug condescension in this first clip from MSNBC:  [Video clip]

When Journalism started to die.  Some conservatives may believe that the Fourth Estate lost its luster in the '90s and signed its integrity over to the Democrat Party, but the death throes came much earlier during the Vietnam War.  We lost over 58k casualties in that war and it is the only military conflict that we walked away from.  Yet the truth is that we never lost a major battle in Vietnam, even Barack Obama admitted that fact.  We lost the war over here, thanks to the fake news spread here by the most trusted man in America, Walter Cronkite. [...] Don't know much about his personal beliefs but he blatantly lied about the war and the Tet offensive.  Until Cronkite's public verdict that the 1968 Tet offensive was a "defeat" for the U.S. the majority of Americans supported our nation's involvement.  Cronkite falsely claimed that the Vietcong had held the American embassy for six hours and that the offensive "went on for two months."  The facts show that Tet was actually a major defeat for the communist enemy[.]

Frauds: The Election, Media, Congressional Dems, and the FBI.  The first of this week's two biggest stories was Friday evening's action by the Supreme Court refusing to hear the lawsuit brought by Texas and other states respecting the evident fraud in the balloting in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Michigan. [...] The second most significant matter, in my view, was the clear gaslighting the media and former intelligence officials carried out on the Hunter Biden story, hiding the fact that he's been under criminal investigation since 2018 for bribery, tax evasion, and money laundering from, among other sources, China.  Drew Holden and Arthur Schwartz rounded up the evidence of this gaslighting.  That it was effective in its bad faith effort at keeping relevant information about Chinese bribery of the Biden family and their consummate corruption in time to affect the election is clear.  One survey reports that nearly 10% of those who voted for Biden in key states would not have had they known about this scandal which the major media deeply hid from them.

Video: TV Journalists Flat-Out Lying About Hunter Biden's Laptop.  For almost a week, liberal cable and broadcast networks have ignored the FBI saying it has "nothing to add" to DNI Ratcliffe's assessment that the alleged Hunter Biden laptop is not part of a Russian disinformation campaign.  Despite these statements from both Ratcliffe and the FBI, TV journalists continued to warn viewers that the entire story looks like a Russian intelligence op.  The media have been defending Biden and his son from the President's attacks for as long as Trump has been making them.  Just over a year ago, when allegations surfaced that Biden had interfered in Ukrainian politics for personal gain, journalists and reporters insisted tirelessly that there was "no evidence" that the former Vice President "had done anything wrong."  [Video clip]

Will Anyone Face Any Consequences For Gaslighting Americans On The Hunter Biden Story?  So now that it is overwhelmingly evident the New York Post's initial Hunter and Jim Biden story wasn't based on hacked material, wasn't Russian misinformation, is clearly something people deserved to know before voting, and that big tech and America's corporate media tried to make sure that didn't happen — and that once again rather than alter their behavior or ask for forgiveness, they're going to instead attempt to gaslight you about all of it — I have a number of questions.  First, when did Joe Biden first learn that his repeated claims the stories about his son and his brother were Fake News — or in his phrasing, debunked, smears, and the like — were in fact false?  When was he briefed on this exactly, and by whom?  And why, given that every effort was made to distance Hunter from the campaign, did the defensive announcement come from the Transition instead of just from Hunter himself if Joe, as he has always claimed, has nothing to do with this?

Here Are All The Times Joe Biden Falsely Claimed Stories About Hunter Were Debunked.  For months, former Vice President Joe Biden has vehemently denied that any evidence exists that his son, Hunter, was involved in criminal activity or wrongdoing.  These denials now look like dishonesty after the Biden-Harris transition team released a statement Wednesday [12/9/2020] acknowledging that Hunter is indeed under investigation by the Department of Justice for potential tax crimes.  "I learned yesterday for the first time that the U.S. Attorney's Office in Delaware advised my legal counsel, also yesterday, that they are investigating my tax affairs," Hunter wrote in the statement.  This news, as Federalist Editor Mollie Hemingway pointed out, is not actually new and was reported before the election, but was purposefully suppressed by gatekeepers like Facebook, Twitter, and corporate media outlets who ignored the reporting on Hunter Biden's affairs.

How to Steal an Entire Country.  Investigations and impeachments have been blasted forcefully into our faces for years, thanks to the author of the MSM's Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), Joseph Goebbels, of Third Reich fame, who said, "The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly — it must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over. ... A lie told once remains a lie but a lie told a thousand times becomes the truth." It appears he also wrote the SOPs for Facebook, one of which is clearly "propaganda works best when those who are being manipulated are confident they are acting on their own free will."  Now, all across the MSM, Biden's "victory" consequences are given the fait accompli treatment.  We should all just behave and accept reality.  It sounds and reads like this:  "Trump is baselessly contesting the results."  "Trump campaign court cases have been thrown out due to baseless claims."  All the "doing" is from the Trump side, and it's wasting everyone's time.  The Democrats haven't done a thing, obviously.  They are the innocent victims, once again, of Trump's craziness.  "Meanwhile, President-Elect Biden saw his shadow again today."  There is nothing baseless about what happened.

Setting the Stage for Revolution.  The 2020 election had a series of unprecedented results, any one of which would be a miracle.  For example, Trump increased his vote by 17% and lost, which has never happened in American history.  There was a 20% increase in the vote, something else that has never happened in electoral history.  Compounding all of this is the stunning dishonesty we are seeing.  The media lies so much that they have become worthless at news reporting.  Outside of sports scores, nothing they "report" can be accepted at face value.  In fact, the prudent way to consume American media now is to just assume what they are saying is false.  At least one possible option is eliminated as you guess at the truth.

Australian pundits not buying American media's mantra, call claims of no evidence or fraud 'a lie'.  President Donald Trump is getting some support for his claims of voter fraud from as far away as Australia.  Some members of the media in the land down under are openly challenging the premature crowning of Democrat Joe Biden as the winner of the 2020 presidential election, accusing the press in the U.S. of "willfully" misleading the public with the "lie" that Trump has lost his reelection bid.

Did President Trump Spring a Trap on Treasonous Democrats on Election Night?  So certain were the complicit media of a win for Clinton that they predicted a 95% probability of her winning.  But the same blunder — born of Democrat arrogance and overconfidence from years of triumphant cheating — would not occur a second time in 2020.  The media would, during Trump's first term as president, embark on creating the illusion that the most popular president since Ronald Reagan was actually reviled.  This Big Lie would be endlessly repeated, in hopes of making enough people believe a loss to Biden was in the cards for Trump.

Media Childishly Dismissive of Gettysburg Vote Fraud Hearing.  The mainstream media, rather than cover in any real detail the serious allegations of voting fraud that were presented at a Gettysburg hearing of the Pennsylvania Senate Majority Policy Committee on Wednesday, instead mocked and dismissed the event.  CNN made no effort to hide its extreme bias over the hearing in its headline which described it as a "baseless voter fraud event," "Trump invites Pennsylvania GOP lawmakers to White House after calling in to baseless voter fraud event."  In addition, the story put "hearing" in quotes so as to present it as somehow not a real hearing.

Don't Give an Inch.  For five years, the Democratic party and their allies in the corporate media, the coddled government bureaucracies, and the Big Tech platforms have fought Trump with every weapon at their disposal.  They uncritically and feverishly repeated every deranged theory that Trump was really a Russian asset operating as Putin's Manchurian candidate, and then cheered on his impeachment for it. [...] Media outlets that breathlessly ran with a fake story about Trump killing an entire pond of koi fish refused to cover the violent riots that broke out across the country this summer.  They stood in front of buildings that were literally on fire, claiming the protests were "fiery, but mostly peaceful."  They told us that border walls don't stop illegal immigration, riots don't spread COVID-19 (but schools and church services do), and Joe Biden would win in a landslide.

'Antifa:  Rise of the Black Flags' Shows the Chaos, Anarchy Hatched by an 'Idea'.  Director David Lugo has a warning for the mainstream media.  Citizen journalists are coming, ready to counter the false narratives peddled by the press.  In a way, Lugo is part of that movement.  His new film, "Antifa:  Rise of the Black Flags," captures the threats posed by what one presidential candidate flippantly called an "idea."  That "idea" has trashed cities across the country, and there's little indication Antifa will stand down in 2021.  [Video clip]

Why is challenging suspicious election results 'a threat to our democracy'?  On Thursday, President Trump's legal team presented many pieces of information about the election that deserve to be investigated.  But the media have no interest in that.  Instead, they essentially black out the news and ask Trump to concede so they can crown their chosen king.  Worst of all, they continue to falsely claim there is no evidence of fraud.  The New York Times and others have written about the potential fraud on universal mail-in ballots in the past, as have other outlets, but now they call Trump a liar.  The media outlets know that rules were changed to make verification of mail-in ballots less verifiable, but they don't care.

Flat Out TDS: Media Is Already Trying to Erase Trump Being President.  News broke yesterday [11/20/2020] that President Donald Trump's son, Donald Trump, Jr. had tested positive for the Wuhan coronavirus.  Now most normal people on both sides of the aisle would wish him well, perhaps even telling the president they wished his son well.  Not so much Yahoo.  Here's the headline from the Yahoo article about the news:  Former reality TV show host's son tests positive for COVID-19.  Yes, that's how they're now trying to describe President Donald Trump.  They're so incapable of accepting the reality they can't even put it in a headline and they're hoping to obliterate his presidency simply by obstinacy.

Democrats And Media Are Reaping Fruit Of 4 Years Of Anti-Trump Conspiracy Theories.  A prominent liberal legal academic who spent the last four years pushing outrageous, discredited, and debunked conspiracy theories about Donald Trump stealing the 2016 election said on Fox News Sunday that refusal to accept the legitimacy of the 2020 presidential election threatens the country.  "He is undermining democracy because there are millions of people who will believe him even though there is nothing to his arguments and no evidence to back them," Harvard Law professor Laurence Tribe said of President Trump's litigation regarding the November election. [...] Tribe began pushing the Russia collusion theory on July 25, 2016, well after the Hillary Clinton campaign had secretly developed and begun running its "Russia collusion" campaign operation, but before the FBI had started its Crossfire Hurricane investigation.  "I'm not into conspiracy," he wrote, before suggesting Russian oligarchs had compromised Trump with business deals and made him develop a foreign policy that U.S. allies should be responsible for more of their own anti-Russian defense budgets.  A follow-up tweet said Trump was hiding his tax returns in order to hide his business relationship with Vladimir Putin.  By July 28, 2016, Tribe was wondering if Trump had committed the capital crime of "treason."  By July 29, 2016, he was proposing wringing Trump on charges of violating the Logan Act.  On October 17, 2016, he began suggesting Trump had rigged the election against Clinton.

A Vegas oddsmaker's take on Fox News and the election grift.  [Scroll down]  At that point, something very weird occurred.  It didn't happen at CNN or MSNBC, it happened at Fox News.  You all remember that Fox refused to call Florida, Ohio, or Texas for Trump, even though Trump was miles ahead in those three states.  Additionally, even though Trump was also significantly ahead in Virginia, Fox nevertheless called the state for Biden.  But that wasn't the worst: ["]And then it happened.  It was the most bizarre call in Election Night history.  Fox News called Arizona for Biden.  Why?  It wasn't even close to over.  There was no reason on earth to make that call.  Arizona is STILL not over 8 days later.  CNN still hasn't awarded Arizona.  ABC pulled it back from Biden only 24 hours ago.["]

There is evidence, actually.  The media has been claiming since the election ended that President Trump's claims of voter fraud are 'baseless' and 'without evidence'.  That just is not true.  The President's lawyer gave examples of it during today's press conference at the Republican National Committee headquarters in Washington DC.  But everyone is too busy mocking him to pay attention.  I tried to listen to what Giuliani actually said and not what he looked like or the characterization of him by the rest of the media.  The cameras started feverishly clicking the first time he wiped the sweat from his face, all but guaranteeing that would be the focus of the presser.  Giuliani did in fact present evidence of voter fraud today but many people simply didn't want to hear it.  He cited multiple Americans, one by name, who have signed sworn affidavits stating that they witness some type of fraud, whether it was pro-Trump ballots being thrown out without cause, ballots being backdated to before the election, poll workers being told not to ask voters for identification, and more.

Vainglory of the Press.  Of all the claims that have been made in this election, the most astounding is the idea that the proper authority to certify the winner — and dispose of all objections — is the press.  That would be the same press that proved to be so inaccurate in respect of what would happen in the past two elections.  It is now in high dudgeon over the fact that millions of Americans lack for confidence in its decision to call the race for Mr. Biden.  What vainglory.  "Day by day," the Washington Post editorializes this morning, "President Trump's efforts to overturn the results of a free and fair election grow more brazen." Notice the en passant nature of its reference to the election being free and fair.  It dasn't acknowledge even a possibility that determining the freeness and fairness of the blasted election is the point of all the challenges and litigation.

Chaos and Anarchy in DC.  In case you missed it, over the weekend tens of thousands of protesters marched in the District of Columbia to voice their support of the president and opposition to voter fraud.  The "Million MAGA March," held Saturday afternoon, was a peaceful event.  But as the sun went down and the pro-Trump demonstrators left the protest, violent agitators and counterprotesters emerged and descended upon them to harass and, in many cases, to commit violence.  [Seven video clips]  Police arrested 21 people in connection to the violence, according to NBC Washington.  NBC Washington described some of the various charges of the suspects in this maelstrom, which included disorderly conduct and assault.  Though many local outlets covered these incidents extensively, the story gathered little attention from national media.  One would think that widespread violent attacks on peaceful protesters expressing their First Amendment rights would elicit a strong response from journalists.  But coverage was both lukewarm and deceptive, portraying the incident as if it was Trump supporters who were the originators of the violent behavior.

The press conference the media mocked, derided, and refused to cover.  I watched the news conference Thursday conducted by President Trump's campaign attorneys, and later visited the websites of the major networks to see what their interpretation of the bombshell would be.  CNN said they wouldn't even air the news conference because it was 'so bananas' and 'full of BS.'  Yes, really.  MSNBC linked to a Chuck Todd commentary saying:  "This has been a bonkers press conference."  ABC linked to this headline:  "Promising more lawsuits, Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani recycles debunked claims."  CBS News, at 9:32 p.m., had no mention of the news conference at all.  NBC News put out:  "Rudy Giuliani baselessly alleges 'centralized' voter fraud at free-wheeling news conference."  Fox News's Kristin Fisher blatantly called Giuliani a liar.

'We no longer have' an 'honest press'.  Imagine if Joe Biden had enjoyed a healthy lead on election night only to see it evaporate as the numbers dripped in from Republican strongholds.  Does anyone believe the mainstream media would have rushed to anoint Donald Trump the winner?  Would the New York Times, Washington Post, NPR and other outlets have cast the inevitable Democrat demands for ballot reviews and recounts as a constitutional crisis or would they have run wall-to-wall coverage about the inherent problems associated with mail-in ballots?

Red Flags in Wisconsin and Minnesota.  The mainstream media continues to pitch the idea that the November 3 presidential election was free and fair.  Yet the numbers just don't add up.  Looking closely at outcomes in states like Minnesota and Wisconsin, certain "red flag" patterns emerge.  First, both states experienced an anomalous 89% voter turnout, a number between 14 and 22 points higher than the turnout in the 2016 General Election.  Secondly, both states had a surprisingly high number of ballots that were not completely filled out with a large portion of incomplete ballots either cast for Biden but not for a U.S. House Democrat (95% in Minnesota; 57% in Wisconsin) or a disproportionately high number of incomplete ballots cast for a US House Republican but not for Trump (43% in Wisconsin).

Contesting Election Results in Court Isn't the End of Democracy.  Quite the Opposite.  Is a disputed presidential election the end of democracy as we know it?  That's what many pundits and members of the legacy media are claiming as President Donald Trump has challenged election results in a number of states — both legally and rhetorically.  It seems that much of the media hivemind now insists that voter fraud never happens, that it's equally impossible for an election to be stolen or tainted in any way, and that going a few weeks with two rival candidates both declaring victory (including one they really don't like) means we are witnessing the end of America as a free country.  It's amazing that this is the case after countless Democrats, including Hillary Clinton, insisted that Trump colluded with Russians to steal the 2016 election, a story that most major media outlets ran with for years without providing any hard evidence.

Mainstream Media United in Forcing 'President-Elect' Biden Down Your Throat.  Some skepticism is called for when the mainstream media are so uniformly in agreement about anything, let alone about a hotly disputed presidential election.  "President-elect" is the legal term for the person with 270 or more votes cast in the Electoral College, which doesn't even meet this year to cast those votes until Dec. 14, a month in the future.  Then, and only then, will we have a "president-elect."  And maybe not even then if the investigations of corruption in several states haven't concluded and hold up certifying state election results.  So, at least until then, the correct term for Joe Biden is not "president-elect," despite the mainstream media gratuitously hanging that title on him.

Disgraced Fox News Retracts False House Race Projection — 8 Days Later!  Obviously, the biggest Election Day loser will either be President Trump or Joe Biden, depending on who ultimately wins the presidential election, and the second biggest loser will be congressional Democrats, who lost seats in the House and failed to retake the Senate majority, but another major loser — without any question — is disgraced Fox News.  The bottom is falling out of Fox's reputation, and there are reports that the once-respected outlet is suffering in the ratings.  None of this should surprise anyone, especially with the countless botched calls and outright lies still being uncovered during the dumpster fire that was Fox's Election Night coverage.

Time to cut the cord on media's Trump bashing.  [Scroll down]  Here's a few other things that are bugging me:  A pablum-puking MSNBC "historian" who swoons over how great Joe Biden's speeches are, and then it turns out he's been writing them. [...] Any Democrat who doesn't put air quotes around "glitches" anytime he or she mentions one fraud or another.  Any alleged pundit who says President-Select (as opposed to Elect) Joe Biden faces the greatest challenges of any president since the Civil War.  (Too many to list.)  Anyone who compares Dementia Joe to FDR. [...] Anyone on TV who spent the last four years screaming "Russia!  Russia!  Russia!" who is now saying that anyone who has doubts about the election is not "patriotic."  Anyone who says that all reports of ballot fraud have been "debunked."  Anyone who says that the "adults" are now going to be in charge.  Anyone who mentions the potential of a "coup," without acknowledging what the four-year-long Russia-Russia-Russia hoax was.

Every MSM Outlet:  Postal Voting Fraud Whistleblower Recants!  Whistleblower:  No I Didn't!  We've reached the point in the post-election cycle where the mainstream media is so desperate to make Democrats' election fraud for Joe Biden stick that they're not just ignore election fraud stories, they're outright lying about them.  Take for example the recent news story of a U.S. postal worker whistleblower Richard Hopkins recanting his accusations of being instructed to backdate ballots.  Just one tiny little flaw in the story:  he did no such thing.

Extortion Day.  In the days preceding last week's election, the downtown corridors of many American cities resembled coastal hurricane zones.  Business owners boarded up their stores, fearing that the election might unleash another wave of destructive rioting.  In Washington, D.C., luxury shops and office complexes constructed fortifications with boards, chains, fences, and barriers.  In the neighborhood surrounding the White House, the Secret Service, laborers, and left-wing protesters all prepared for Election Night.  Then something miraculous happened.  The following morning, as the election returns began to favor former vice president Joe Biden, the fences, boards, and chains came down.  Small business owners reopened their shops, and the anticipation of violence evaporated.  The national media, which had been stoking fears about Proud Boys and white supremacists flooding the cities with political violence, simply dropped the story — as if it had never been a story.

Don't Give an Inch.  For five years, the Democratic party and their allies in the corporate media, the coddled government bureaucracies, and the Big Tech platforms have fought Trump with every weapon at their disposal.  They uncritically and feverishly repeated every deranged theory that Trump was really a Russian asset operating as Putin's Manchurian candidate, and then cheered on his impeachment for it.  An FBI lawyer altered evidence to spy on a U.S. citizen while texting "viva la resistance" to his colleagues.  When, less than a month before the election, Facebook and Twitter outright banned the circulation of a New York Post story involving corruption in the Biden family, media outlets happily did the same.  The New York Times accused Trump of faking his post-COVID White House appearance with a green screen and using secret Twitter code to activate right-wing extremists.  CNN is now settling libel suits for its role in instigating a vicious social media campaign and physical threats against a Catholic high school kid — all for the crime of wearing a MAGA hat.  Media outlets that breathlessly ran with a fake story about Trump killing an entire pond of koi fish refused to cover the violent riots that broke out across the country this summer.  They stood in front of buildings that were literally on fire, claiming the protests were "fiery, but mostly peaceful."  They told us that border walls don't stop illegal immigration, riots don't spread COVID-19 (but schools and church services do), and Joe Biden would win in a landslide.

New York Times' Kevin Roose Calls Accurate Stories About Election Integrity Fight 'Misinformation'.  In a sign of things to come from the blacklisters in the corporate media, New York Times' tech writer Kevin Roose attacked Facebook for allowing stories that are 100 percent accurate to rise to "the 10 most-engaged URLs on the platform over the last 24 hours."  "Facebook is absolutely teeming with right-wing misinformation right now.  These are all among the 10 most-engaged URLs on the platform over the last 24 hours," the far-left propagandist tweeted from his verified account on Monday [11/9/2020]. [...] All four of those stories are news stories.  All four of those stores are reporting on events that actually happened.  All four of those stories are informing readers of what is going on.  A Republican in Michigan did win an election after a glitch was found.  That's a fact.  That happened.  Attorney General Barr did authorize his staff to look at voting irregularities.  That's a fact.  That happened.  The Michigan legislature did hold an emergency session about election irregularities.  That's a fact.  That happened.  Both of Georgia's Republican U.S. Senate candidates — Loeffler and Perdue — did call on Georgia's secretary of state to resign.  That's a fact.  That happened.

Voter Fraud Plus Bait-and-Switch Equals Tyranny.  [Scroll down]  Biden was simply the front man, and he knew pollsters would rig the numbers to show him with a massive lead.  The establishment media confirmed they had learned nothing.  Fox News polls were among the worst and on election night, as Kimball noted, Fox refused to call Florida for Trump even after he had won the state.  They called Arizona for Biden when it still in play, with lines at the polls.  Two days after the election, Fox refused to call Alaska and other states for Trump, even though the president's win was clear.

The Darkness Where Democracy Dies.  [Scroll down]  President Trump brokered real peace between Israel and an ever-expanding list of long-hostile Arab nations that so far includes UAE, Sudan, and Bahrain.  The press ignored it or disparaged it, so the people are in the dark about it.  American cities have been devastated by riots that the media called "mostly peaceful protests."  Millions of Americans don't know the extent of what happened or were poisoned with regard to interpretation of those tragic events.  For three years, the Deep State and the media propagated a complete fabrication known as Trump/Russia Collusion.  No evidence was found for it.  It never happened.  Yet they still report that it did.  Today, nearly half the country believes it happened.  That is known as propaganda, which is very dark.  Tony Bobulinski came forward with hard, credible evidence of Joe Biden's egregious corruption of American foreign policy for the purposes of enriching his family with laundered millions from China, Ukraine, and others.  Social media censored the story.  Incredibly, the entire MSM dismissed it as Russian disinformation.  The result is this:  a compromised man with regard to national security has been crowned president by the same media that kept the people in the dark.

Corrupt Media Desperate to Close the Books on Contested Election.  Joe Biden is not "president-elect."  Joe Biden has not won the 2020 presidential election.  Donald Trump's re-election has not been defeated.  Right now, Joe Biden is merely "ahead in the count" of enough states to win the presidency.  But this is a contested election and we have a long way to go, probably more than a month and a plethora of legal filings, before a winner is declared.  Per our own Constitution, there is only one institution legally entitled to declare a winner in a presidential election, and that's the Electoral College, which does not meet until the middle of December.  Only the Electoral College can dub someone "president-elect."  The fake news media, of course — the corporate media, the same corrupt media that told us to be patient if Election Day lasted weeks, now want us to forget all that, want to close the book on the election before it has been audited, want us to believe unelected liars who sit in anchor chairs have the legal authority to declare Joe Biden "president elect."

'Since when did the Lamestream Media decide who the President is?' Trump doubles down on refusing to concede.  President Donald Trump pushed out more unsubstantiated claims that the election was stolen by firing off a series of angry tweets Sunday, even as the vote count continued to move against him and Joe Biden shifted into transition mode.  The tweet from Trump came more than an hour after George W. Bush issued a message telling him the election's outcome was 'clear' and that it was held with 'fairness and integrity' and Chris Christie, one of the president's most prominent allies, said it was time for him to show evidence or 'move on.'  With his political options narrowing and his hold on power becoming more tenuous by the hour, Trump also blasted the media for getting to 'call' who will be the next president.

Why Hasn't Fox News Retracted Its Wrong Call on the House?  Despite what Fox News might think, this election — as it drags ever closer to unreality — is not decided by Fox News.  On Election Night, Fox News Channel's decision desk "called the House," saying Democrats would gain five seats.  This happened while Californians were still voting.  Why does that matter?  Because there are four districts in California that Democrats won from Republicans in 2018 and which Republicans were trying to retake.  They are likely to win at least three of them.  In all, a source close to House Republican leadership says the GOP is likely to go into the next Congress with between 210 and 214 seats.  That means they gained 11-14 seats and substantially trimmed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's majority.  Fox News could not have been more wrong, but they still have not retracted their very wrong, very badly timed call.

Saturday's Media Declaration Is A Naked Attempt To Silence Republicans, And Nothing Has Changed.  Nothing has changed since Friday night.  You might find that strange, given the media stampede to certify the election results for their man, but it's crucial.  The calls made Saturday morning are as arbitrary as they were last Tuesday, could just as easily have waited for Monday, and fly in the face of massive evidence of voter irregularities that, at minimum, should be heard in court before anyone considers calling the election.  Add pending lawsuits and official recounts in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, Nevada, Michigan and Wisconsin, and the conclusion is an attempt by the American media to pick our president and decide our election.  The danger comes now, when in concert with Silicon Valley censors they use their own decree to dismiss and silence anyone who says otherwise.

Media Declares Joe Biden Winner of 2020 Election.  The strategy of using of mail-in ballots to structurally steal the 2020 election predictably contained an inevitable series of events to support it.  The media's preemptive declaration of a Biden victory is one cascading domino in that very predictable sequence.  The media effort is to build a wave narrative strong and heavy enough to block any sunlight upon the fraud perpetrated by regional election officials.  The statistical improbability of the U.S. election outcome are glaring; there are hundreds of examples that just don't make sense.  Thus the need for the media narrative becomes more important.  Perhaps the most unnerving aspect to this election fraud is knowing that Joe Biden is merely a puppet for a group of political and deep state interests; the Milli Vanilli candidate with a giggling high-school-minded VP.

Newsmax rises, Fox falls.  Fox won Election Night bigly.  Their 14 million viewer [ratings] were yuge.  Then the network began showing its RINO side, and then its liberal side.  WTMA reported, "Conservatives ditched Fox News for Newsmax TV's election coverage in droves.  On Election Night, celebrities, political pundits in the White House, and staunch Fox fans tuned into Newsmax TV to get their election news, more proof of the meteoric rise in popularity of Newsmax TV.  "Many began flipping the channel after Fox News called Arizona for Democrat Joe Biden.  According to Newsweek, Fox was the only network at the time to show the state going to Biden.  Newsmax was the first major news network to project Florida for Trump."  Fox went downhill when the Family Murdoch kicked Roger Ailes to the curb.

Time for Fox News to climb out of the hole it's dug.  Fox News was early in predicting that Arizona would go for Biden, even though the people at the network knew that the most Republican county in the state was not yet counted.  When they saw Trump's lead in Georgia dwindle to nothing, they reported it as though it were the weather.  When they heard Trump's claims of voter fraud, they found "experts" to proclaim that Trump had no evidence.  I credit Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity, and Laura Ingraham for daring to bring up the subject.  Is there evidence of voter fraud?  A postal worker reports that his boss wanted him to backdate postmarks in Michigan.  The Pennsylvania Supreme Court legislated election procedure changes in the last few months.  Some ballots were found literally hiding under a rock in Arizona.  In all, thousands of votes were illegally cast.  This means that there are thousands of criminals on the loose.  This apparently does not count as evidence.

Cutting the Cable News Cord.  Having worked a significant portion of my life as a news reporter and editor, journalism will always be in my blood.  I crave news and information like some crave chocolate.  That will likely never change.  What will change is where I get that news and information.  While there are many reasons which factored into my decision, the final proverbial straw came when Fox News continued to deny any "credible evidence" of election/voter fraud.  Such declarations were often delivered by anchors with a sneer and a smirk.  With social media and big tech-monopolies banning and censoring evidence of verifiable election fraud, even Fox News likely feels safe in perpetuating the "nothing to see here" lie.  The problem for these censoring overlords and truth-deniers is that election fraud is, in fact, taking place.  When dead people somehow rise from the grave to vote, that is election fraud.  When people who are not legally permitted by law to vote somehow manage to do so, there is election fraud.  When states defy court orders and violate the law by refusing to allow one party access to vote counting, that is election fraud.  When statistically impossible ballot percentages magically appear in the dead of night, election fraud is likely the cause.  When thumb-drives miraculously appear from thin air, election fraud possibilities should, at the very least, be investigated.  One need not be a legal scholar to comprehend what election/voter fraud is.

Media Calls the Race For Joe Biden But Is it Really Over?  The television networks have called the 2020 presidential election, announcing Joe Biden as the winner in Pennsylvania — giving him, in theory, enough electoral college votes to become the next president.  But is it over?  Election officials have yet to call the win, and the Trump campaign has several legal challenges in play.  Networks rushed to the airwaves to announce that Biden had taken the 20 electoral votes in PA less than 15 minutes before Trump's legal team was to hold a press conference in Philadelphia, PA.  Trump campaign attorneys represented by Rudy Giuliani spoke about irregularities in the voting and ballot-counting process.  Leftist media outlets immediately launched sensationalized headlines such as "You're Fired" but the president vowed in a statement that the fight is not yet over.

The Democrats' Chickens Come Home to Roost.  The majority of Americans do not trust the mainstream left-wing media.  Four years of hatchet jobs, defamation, character assassinations, and such leave Independents, no less than conservatives, unable to believe ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS, MSNBC, CNN, the Washington Post, and the New York Times.  For those few who still cling to their doubts but hopes about media credibility, the nonsensical polls sealed the deal.  Only die-hards on the left now believe Jake Tapper or Rachel Maddow or their ilk.

Media gaslights GOP voters with false attributions to Republicans supposedly 'rebuking' Trump.  Major media outlets have begun to gaslight GOP voters in the wake of a contentious and still unsettled election using false or misleading claims attributed to Republicans who are supposedly rebuking President Donald Trump.  The UK's Daily Mail, for instance, published a story under a lengthy headline that is blatantly false:  "Mitch McConnell says EVERY vote must be counted in a veiled rebuke to Trump — as GOP's Pennsylvania senator calls president's conspiracy-theory rant 'hard to watch' and says there is NO large scale fraud."  "Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell ignored President Donald Trump's wild claims of widespread election fraud, sending out a sober tweet Friday morning," the lead paragraph claimed.  But the very next paragraph — which is a quote from McConnell himself — directly refutes what was just claimed.

Vote Against the DC and Manhattan Media Elite.  [Scroll down]  From Election Day 2016, the mainstream media originating from Manhattan and Washington, DC, have thrown off the shackles of objectivity and re-envisioned their role in the American political conversation.  From The New York Times to the Washington Post to all the network newsrooms to MSNBC and the once-respected CNN, the fourth estate has revealed itself as a fifth column.  They've stopped pretending to report the facts.  They've become the voice of the resistance, and they've aligned their resources, talents and waning influence for one objective:  To end the Trump presidency.  First, they tried to undermine his inauguration by publishing the phony "Steele dossier" days before his swearing-in.  The narrative to the American people was to plant the seed that our new president was a traitor and puppet of the Russian government.  It was a complete lie.  But the damage was done.  It led to the anonymous leaks that suggested Trump was trying to stop an investigation into his campaign.

The Mainstream Media's COVID Cover-up Continues.  The mainstream media's double standard when it comes to accuracy is undeniable to anyone with a shred of integrity.  For stories that favor the Left or damage the Right, the bar couldn't be lower.  For stories that are vice-versa, however, the media's scrutiny has no end.  We've seen the phenomenon ad nauseam for years now, but its frequency and impact has reached a critical level.  We saw it with Christine Blasey Ford and her uncorroborated accusations against Justice Brett Kavanaugh that were willingly regurgitated by Democrats and their media.  We see it currently with the unfolding scandal involving Hunter Biden, as the media scoffs at its legitimacy in spite of the validated authenticity of the emails that kick-started the whole hubbub.  There is arguably no story, however, where the media's duplicity is more evident and more detrimental than what we've seen regarding their reporting on COVID-19.

Will the Mainstream Media Disappear a Trump Election Victory?  Entrepreneur and Dilbert-creator Scott Adams has put forth an intriguing possibility about the election outcome.  Even if President Donald Trump wins re-election, the mainstream media may attempt to undo the election by reporting that he lost.  The half of the country that lives inside the media misinformation bubble may believe this, and it may instigate a period of instability and uncertainty.  Before Trump, anyone who said anything like what Adams has proposed as a possibility would be deemed a tinfoil-hat conspiracy theorist, and with good reason.  But during Trump's presidency, the mainstream media have disregarded the truth, to the point where they openly tell lies that half the country immediately recognizes as disinformation.

The real story behind the New York Times's big 'anonymous' op-ed is exceptionally sleazy.  Indeed, based on what we know now, everyone involved in this sad episode comes across as remarkably unethical, most especially the op-ed's author, former Department of Homeland Security employee Miles Taylor.  For starters, Taylor and the New York Times grossly exaggerated his credentials as a "senior" member of the Trump administration.  Taylor served as a "Deputy Chief of Staff" at the time he submitted his op-ed to the paper.  He did not hold the position of chief of staff until later.  Yet, the New York Times billed him anyway as a "senior official in the Trump administration," an overblown descriptor that Taylor himself made no effort to correct.

Yes, [the] Media Are Rigging [the] Election Against Half The Country.  Here's How.  This week saw the news that the supposedly high-ranking "Anonymous" government official that published a 2018 New York Times op-ed about secretly undermining a president he personally disagreed with was in fact a 30-year-old mid-level bureaucrat nobody had ever heard of.  The fake narrative that the New York Times knowingly promulgated roiled the administration for months, if not years, as high-level cabinet officials took turns denying that they were secretly and unconstitutionally undermining the elected president of the United States.  Miles Taylor was the Homeland Security Department policy analyst who turned out to have written the op-ed and a best-selling book about how he and other Resistance members put their personal political preferences over the ones chosen by the voting populace when they elected Trump president.  That little op-ed was nothing compared to the preposterously false Russia collusion hoax that the media promulgated for years thanks to dubious and selective leaks from politically motivated sources.

Facts Matter:  Trump's Real Record on Race.  Whether it's Chris Wallace, or Savannah Guthrie, or Jim Acosta, some other loudmouth reporter screaming the "denounce" demand as the President walks by, this demand, premised upon a lie, gets repeated ad nauseam by dishonest journalists.  Their purpose is to create a false impression that Trump has done something, or said something in the past, that makes him a "racist."  But nothing could be further from the truth.  The president's record shows something quite the opposite of the insinuations shouted by the Trump-hating members of the liberal media.  In fact, the president's record, over time, pictures a man with a huge heart and great compassion and love for the African-American community in the United States.

Leslie Stahl's Behavior in that Trump 60 Minutes Interview Got Even Dumber.  60 Minutes is really, really mad.  As Kira Davis and Nick Arama both covered yesterday, Trump preemptively released the interview to counter the selective editing and narrative pushing Leslie Stahl, the interviewer, and company were looking do.  Initially, anonymous claims were made to major networks that Trump had "stormed out."  The President's video shows that was false.  Then you got idiocy like this, where Stahl insists that the Hunter Biden emails shouldn't be reported on because they "can't be verified." Ignoring the fact that the media report on all manner of unverified gossip when it's anti-Trump, Stahl's excuse is also nonsensical, as the emails have been verified in multiple ways.

Media's Uphill Battle to Create a Self-Fulfilling Election Prophecy.  The media effort in 2020 is indeed very similar to 2016 in that current narratives are a psychological effort to create a self-fulfilling prophecy.  Baseline 101: Everyone naturally wants to be on the winning team.  The media effort, and that means all media including social media and big tech, is to push down Trump support and elevate the appearance of Biden support.  I really wish people would deeply consider this. [...] Everything you are witnessing right now is about psychological control to create the false illusion of reality within your own mind.  Essentially, professional media gaslighting with an agenda and purpose.  This is not a conspiracy theory, those who are coordinating the effort have admitted exactly what they are doing.

'Struggling' bar owner in Biden ad is wealthy investor who supported lockdowns.  A Michigan music venue owner featured in a Joe Biden ad campaign lamenting his struggles to survive during coronavirus restrictions is actually a wealthy tech investor — who supported local lockdowns, according to reports.  Joe Malcoun was featured in the heart-tugging Biden ad that aired during NFL games Sunday complaining about the chances of his Ann Arbor bar and music venue, the Blind Pig, surviving the pandemic. [...] The ad suggested Malcoun's future and his family were at risk, but made no mention of the bar owner's numerous other businesses as a wealthy "angel investor" in tech companies.  Malcoun admitted in a 2018 interview with Click On Detroit that he made his start thanks to a huge inheritance from his wife's grandfather, a real estate investor, that he admitted was "almost like winning the lottery."  It soon made him "the go-to guy when it came to seeking investments," the local news outlet said, helping companies raise millions.

Biden's Big Media Malarkey Machine.  If you believe the media, Joe Biden is heading toward a landslide of such historic proportions that even Texas may tip into the Democrat's column.  Of course, no intelligent person actually believes this, but the propaganda organs of our national media are so devoted to Team Joe that the possibility of turning Texas "blue" continues to be the subject of allegedly serious reporting.  A well-informed source in Texas tells me GOP internal polls show a tighter-than-usual contest there, and Democrats are bombarding young Texans with get-out-the-vote text messages, but this is a state Trump won with a comfortable margin of more than 800,000 votes in 2016.  Nevertheless, the media are dreaming the impossible dream.

5 Other Things We'll Learn About Biden After The Election.  [#3] The economy has been doing much better than the public had been led to believe.  Back in 1996, when George H.W. Bush was running for reelection, the press treated the economy as though it were in another depression, which just so happened to coincide with Bill Clinton's campaign messaging.  As soon as the election was over, coverage of the economy suddenly became more upbeat, and the public learned that the very mild recession had ended way back in March 1991.

What the MSM TV coverage doesn't show you at a Biden Potemkin rally.  Mainstream media coverage of Joe Biden's campaign rallies depicts a false façade, giving an impression of a normal political event.  But the reality is as phony as the façades of prosperous villages that Catherine The Great's political advisor (and lover) Grigori Potemkin erected for her to view from her imperial barge, masking the misery of her subjects.  Potemkin today is remembered chiefly for the expression "Potemkin village," defined as "an impressive facade or show designed to hide an undesirable fact or condition."  (Check the link quickly before Merriam-Webster changes the definition to conform with the political interests of the Democrats.)  A hilarious Twitter video has survived the "fact checkers" at the social media giant (for now), panning from away the podium to show the handful of people — apparenlty, mostly media — standing around and sorta watching Biden's bizarrely impassioned speech to a parking lot in Novi, Michigan (a Detroit suburb) last Friday, [...]

Steve Scully suspended indefinitely by C-SPAN for lying about his Twitter account being hacked.  The man who was to have moderated a town hall-style debate tonight between President Trump and ex-VP Biden has been suspended from his job as C-SPAN's political editor after admitting to lying about his Twitter account being hacked. [...] Scully had asked Trump-hater Scaramucci for advice on dealing with Trump's criticism of him as a NeverTrumper.  By lying and claiming that his account was hacked (the third time he made such a claim) Scully opened Pandora's Box, with his employer, the Commission of Presidential Debates, and the FBI announcing investigations.  He likely concluded that his lie was going to be exposed and may have feared legal consequences if an FBI investigation came to that conclusion.

C-SPAN's Steve Scully suspended after admitting to lying about Twitter hack.  C-SPAN suspended political editor Steve Scully indefinitely on Thursday [10/15/2020] after he confessed to lying about his Twitter account being hacked following an exchange with former White House aide-turned President Trump critic Anthony Scaramucci.  Scully was slated to moderate the second presidential debate between Trump and Democratic nominee Joe Biden scheduled for Thursday night.  The Commission on Presidential Debates canceled the event Friday after the president declined to do the debate virtually after testing positive for COVID-19.  C-SPAN announced last week it was conducting an investigation into the alleged hack.

AP Forced to Issue Correction For Using Democrat Language on Court-Packing.  Last week, the AP Stylebook was amended to discourage the use of the word "riot" to describe violent protests.  Because, you know, they were "mostly peaceful protests."  Or something.  And now, this:  Although at least this time, they were forced to retract their biased shenanigans.

Associated Press goes full Orwell, calling 'packing' of SCOTUS 'court reform'.  It is obvious from Joe Biden telling voters that they don't deserve to know if he plans to pack the Supreme Court that he and his handlers are terrified of a negative voter reaction to the plan.  Biden's remarkably stupid comment came in response to a reporter's question at an interview where no teleprompter guidance was feasible. [...]

Not Making Headlines:  Alleged "Right-wing" Militia Member Arrested for Plot Against Gov. Whitmer Was Black Lives Matter Protester and Sympathizer.  On Thursday [10/8/2020] the FBI announced during a press conference that it thwarted a plot by a so-called "right-wing militia" to kidnap and kill Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer and overthrow the state government.  Early Thursday morning, federal agencies raided a house in Hartland, Michigan and arrested six men:  Adam Fox, Barry Croft, Ty Garbin, Kaleb Franks, Daniel Harris, and Brandon Caserta.  Whitmer immediately blamed the plot on President Trump telling the Proud Boys to "stand back and stand by."  "Hate groups heard the president's words as a rallying cry, as a call to action," Whitmer said blaming white supremacists.  It turns out Brandon Caserta, one of anarchists who was arrested for plotting to kidnap Whitmer, actually hates President Trump and is on video calling Trump a "tyrant."

Turns Out the Folks Behind the Whitmer Plot Aren't Who Dems and Media Are Painting Them As.  The FBI did a good job taking down the group and it sounded like a serious danger to Whitmer if they did what they are alleged to have done, so it's good they got them.  But when Whitmer sounded off about the plot, she immediately tried to falsely link the president and the Proud Boys to the event, neither of which had anything to do with it.  According to Whitmer, Trump had sent a "rallying cry" to "action."  Of course there were several problems with her assertions.  The Proud Boys are a different group, Trump has nothing to do with them and they aren't "white supremacists."  Further, turns out in checking out the folks behind the alleged plot, one of the alleged members, Brandon Caserta, would appear to be an anarchist.  Not only that, he's anti-Trump.

Gregg Jarrett lambastes the media as 'willing accessories to the Russia hoax'.  Fox News legal analyst Greg Jarrett believes that there will be troves of proof demonstrating government officials' egregious misconduct during the Russia collusion probe once all of the materials get declassified.  Jarrett told the "John Solomon Reports" podcast [...] that he thinks "when all of it is declassified there will be a mountain of damning, incriminating evidence about just how devious and corrupt these government officials were in the Russia hoax."

NBC Caught Again Manipulating Joe Biden Town Hall With Planted Audience and Advance Script.  The Washington Free Beacon has done a great job exposing the intentional and manipulative intents of NBC and Lester Holt during a recent town-hall event with presidential candidate Joe Biden.  At this point American media have become Pravda in their efforts to manipulate the outcome of the 2020 election.

Defending Trump from a Tornado of Liberal Lies.  The media's whitewashing of the riots is mind-boggling.  The words we use are important in accurately conveying a message; using words to sugarcoat reality is wrong.  The left is using the phrase "peaceful protests" to describe burning down cities and bludgeoning business-owners who guard their stores from the looters.  Commentators are earnestly lamenting the deprivations of poverty that supposedly are driving the poor to steal in order to be able to eat; actually, the visuals show footage of those stealing luxury items — everything from elite athletes' signature sneakers to big screen TVs — and partiers who are just grabbing whatever — frequently alcohol — for the bragging rights.  Then there are the serious analysts who are using the riots as a pretext to attack Trump.  And for what?  Blaming him for the failures of Democrat mayors and governors to maintain order because... Trump's hate-filled racist rhetoric caused the riots.  The rioters are obviously left-wingers, out-of-work students intoxicated by Marxist rhetoric and bored inner-city kids being manipulated in anarchy by Antifa.  All the talk about "white supremacy" groups is a smokescreen and an insult to the viewers who can see what is actually happening despite all of the gaslighting about "mostly peaceful protests."

Don't Believe Anything 'Sources' Say.  As every sentient person knows by now, our mainstream media and Big Tech platforms are limitlessly corrupt.  Almost nothing they say, report or interpret can be trusted.  They have become mouthpieces for the political Left, resonating bullhorns for the Democratic Party, the "social justice" insurgency, the feminist movement, domestic terrorists like Antifa and BLM, and the concerted effort to vilify and destroy the sitting American president.  A dead giveaway of their malignant agenda is the customary reliance on the "expert," the "insider," a someone-in-the-know code-named as "a source" or, more explicitly, "an unnamed source." The phenomenon is so ubiquitous that it scarcely needs even a jot of documentation.  Just pick up The New York Times or The Washington Post et al., scan any number of Internet sites, or watch CNN, MSNBC and the rest of that morbid crew, and you will meet the unnamed source at every turn.

America's Chris Wallace Problem.  [Chris] Wallace's dismal performance as moderator in Tuesday's [9/29/2020] presidential debate reminded many viewers of such previous instances in which the Fox News Sunday host has shown his prejudice against Trump.  And this matters, not only because of how that ugly televised carnival might affect the election, but because of what it tells us about the sad state of journalism in America. [...] Consider this question he aimed at President Trump:  "You have repeatedly criticized the vice president for not specifically calling out Antifa and other left-wing extremist groups, but are you willing tonight to condemn white supremacists and militia groups and to say that they need to stand down and not add to the violence in a number of these cities, as we saw in Kenosha and as we've seen in Portland?"  Where is the evidence that "white supremacists and militia groups" were to blame for violence in Kenosha or Portland, Oregon?  Wallace's question was not only tendentious, but counterfactual.

Dear Chris Wallace:  We Were In Kenosha, And No, White Supremacists And Militias Didn't Cause Violence.  Ignoring for a moment that Trump's criticism of Joe Biden was absolutely warranted and that Wallace asked Trump to condemn white supremacists but did not ask Biden to condemn Black Lives Matter arsonists and looters, the question itself was specious.  The violence in Kenosha was spurred by left-wing extremist groups, not white supremacists.  We know — because we were there.  Kenosha was up in flames, reduced to the same lawlessness that swept Minneapolis, Portland, Atlanta, and now this small Midwest town.  Monday night in Kenosha, a day after law enforcement shot Jacob Blake, men and women stood with baseball bats and guns in front of their businesses and homes, trying to defend themselves against the extremist violence of the Black Lives Matter left.  Since there weren't enough police to control the situation, officers focused on defending public buildings, such as the courthouse, while leaving citizens to fend for themselves.

Chris Wallace Falsely Implies Trump Never Condemned White Supremacists.  CLAIM:  Debate moderator Chris Wallace implied that President Donald Trump never condemned white supremacists.  VERDICT:  FALSE.  President Trump has done so repeatedly, despite what Wallace — and Joe Biden — have suggested.  During the first presidential debate, Wallace challenged President Trump to condemn white supremacists.  It was an astonishingly ill-informed — and inflammatory — challenge, and repeated a lie that Biden has told frequently in the campaign.  Trump has condemned white supremacists repeatedly.

NYT Admits Trump Actually Paid Nearly $6 Million in Taxes in 2016 and 2017.  Trump PAID, as in transferred to the US Treasury, $1 million in 2016 and $4.2 million in 2017.  Note also that most of the overpayment was rolled forward, not refunded.  The $750 figure is an ADDITIONAL $750.  Thus every single story saying he paid $750 is a lie.

NBC Warns 'Committed Conservative' Barrett 'Instantly Controversial'.  On Saturday evening [9/26/2020], shortly after President Trump nominated Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court, NBC Nightly News let the ideological labels fly as the nominee was repeatedly identified as a "conservative" who was popular with the "religious right" and "instantly controversial."  By contrast, the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was never given any left-wing political label in the report. [...] In the report that followed, correspondent Hallie Jackson emphasized:  "From President Trump, a move to cement a more conservative Supreme Court for a generation."

The Editor says...
Where is the verb in that last sentence?  That's not English, it's Headline-ese.

Jill campaigns for husband Joe before an itty bitty crowd.  Sleepy Joe has taken a lot of days off this month.  The AP disingenuously calls it a "low-key campaign style" but admits it concerns some Democrats.  Biden made 12 visits outside of Delaware since August 12 and President Trump made 24 visits to 17 states.  The NY Times dishonestly claims that Slow Joe's inability to put sentences together is a "stutter."  Neither Joe nor Kamala Harris are answering many reporters' questions and when they do, the questions are softball.

Trump haters [are] gaslighting Trump supporters.  Everywhere you turn, Trump haters are venting their wrath against Trump supporters, as if supporting President Trump is an unforgivable sin.  They're projecting and gaslighting — blaming Trump and his supporters for everything they're doing.  It's madness, but at long last, they might have awakened the sleeping giant they're trying to hunt down and destroy.  MSNBC's Joy Reid tweeted, "Genuine question:  what will be the relationship between the majority of Americans, and Trumpists after this long, national nightmare ends — and it will eventually end — do people anticipate simply letting bygones (be) bygones with people who joined the Trump personality cult?"  What bygones?  Who's doing what to whom?  What are we Trump supporters doing to you Trump haters, Joy?  We are trying to mind our own business and stay safe.

Revolution 2020.  [Scroll down]  Suffice it to note that not a day in four years has gone by without the news media hyperventilating or ruminating on some allegation of Trump's wrongdoing or wrongbeing.  For what?  Again, the list of subjects is so exhaustive that it is easier to note that there is hardly any mortal transgression of which he has not been accused. [...] Nor has the media forgone any occasion to protect, foster, and embellish narratives in support of each and every member of the "intersectional" coalition and to shut out or denigrate alternatives thereto.  It labels as false and/or as "hate speech" facts and arguments that counteract its narratives.  Since the ruling class can be certain of the media's unquestioning support, it need not worry about truth.  For example, do physicians in America and around the world use hydroxychloroquine successfully against the COVID-19 virus?  Yes, correct — but banished as if it were false because it is politically incorrect.  Riots, arson, and looting are leading so many to relocate from America's major cities as to cause urban vacancies and a house-building boom in the country?  Fact.  But politically incorrect fact, indeed, racist.  Repeat: "mostly peaceful protests, mostly peaceful protests."

Harris — not Biden — is the real candidate.  It has been obvious for some time that Biden's cognitive state is on a level with the spider monkey.  He can't remember where he is or what he is running for.  He can't put together a coherent sentence.  His condition has become a running joke.  At his age, he would at best be a one-term president.  So why would a major party pin its hopes on such a man? [...] Enter Kamala Harris.  The media are pushing the argument that Harris is on the ticket because of pressure to choose a woman of color as Biden's running mate.  Note this report from NBC News:  "Add in Biden's age (77), and Harris could find herself in a unique position as vice president.  Instead of having to wait eight years for her shot, she could get it in the next election in 2024."  This is what the Democrats want us to believe.  As usual, it is a lie.  If they win, she won't have to wait at all.

To Rescue Biden, Media Conflate All Teleprompter Use.  At his Wisconsin rally last night, President Donald Trump continued to tease former Vice President Joe Biden for relying on a teleprompter when he answers queries from the media.  While teleprompter use is very common for politicians and others giving formal speeches, Biden is the first candidate to regularly use one outside of formal speeches, such as during press conferences.  During Biden's nearly 50 years in politics, his off-the-cuff remarks have gotten him in more than a bit of trouble, but the obvious teleprompter use is posing problems of its own.

Mostly Peaceful:  The Birth of an Excuse.  In late August, when riots erupted in Kenosha, Wisconsin, CNN featured a reporter standing in front of a burning car lot above a chyron that read:  "Fiery but mostly peaceful protests after police shooting."  The use of the chyron was striking in its peculiar earnestness, considering that the words "mostly peaceful protest" had long since become a bitter in-joke for right-leaning social media.  Indeed, from the moment the first protests began in late May, mainstream media outlets have downplayed or ignored instances of violence or destructive looting.  On May 29, MSNBC's Ali Velshi was reporting from Minneapolis in the aftermath of the killing of George Floyd when he insisted he was seeing "mostly a protest" that "is not, generally speaking, unruly" despite the fact that he was literally standing in front of a burning building at the time.  Yet Velshi was hesitant to ascribe blame to the arsonists and looters.

Antifa and BLM, the Democrat party's stormtroopers.  Not surprisingly, taxpayer-funded NPR has supported the not "peaceful protests" for months.  They have been touting that ludicrous book that defends looting and the destruction of private property.  They regularly use Trump's words out of context.  NPR lost its way long before Trump was elected, but it has been enthusiastically dragged into the anti-Trump fray.  Why taxpayers are forced to subsidize this particular branch of the Democrat party is not a mystery; taxpayers are stooges.  Throughout these past months of violent looting, arson, death, and destruction, NPR, like the rest of the leftist media, has misled their viewers and insisted these riots were "mostly peaceful." They absolutely were not.  They have caused hundreds of millions of dollars in damage, mostly to small businesses, many of them minority-owned.

The Trump Scandal Absorption Level Has Been Reached.  [Scroll down]  We're being lied to on a daily basis.  We're being manipulated by a minority that, without the media, would be invisible.  This minority is literally so small that if the media were not sponsoring them, we wouldn't see them.  Now, as you know, psychologically, this sufficient works.  A lot of people on our side think that we are outnumbered — and the truth is, not only are we not outnumbered, they're not even close to outnumbering us.  Despite how you feel, despite how it might look.  And I'm talking specifically about the Marxist radical leftist.  Not the usual liberal Democrats that we know are out there.  I'm talking about the Antifas and the Black Lives Matters.  They are nowhere near a majority of in this country.  They are a tiny minority, and we're being told by CNN and the New York Times every day that the country has now made the move to Marxism.

AG Barr Rips National Media as a 'Collection of Liars' Over Riot Coverage.  Wrapping up a three-day tour in Chicago, Phoenix and Cleveland Friday, Attorney General Bill Barr took on the media during an exclusive interview with Townhall.  "They're basically a collection of liars.  Most of the mainstream media.  They're a collection of liars and they know exactly what they're doing.  A perfect example of that were the riots.  Right on the street it was clear as day what was going on, anyone observing it, reporters observing it, it could not have escaped their attention that this was orchestrated violence by a hardened group of street fighting radicals and they kept on excluding from their coverage all the video of this and reporting otherwise and they were doing that for partisan reasons, and they were lying to the American people.  It wasn't until they were caught red-handed after essentially weeks of this lie that they even started feeling less timid," Barr said on the flight back to Washington Friday afternoon.

Riots?  What Riots?  In my three decades as a media critic, this summer's huge effort by the press to cover up the endless rioting by George Floyd's mourners has been its most shameless and shameful episode yet.  Until very recently, a remarkable number of naive Americans had fallen for the mainstream media's repetitions that the Peaceful Protesters were not — repeat, not — looting and burning.  The MSM has been in such flat-out denial mode that it hasn't even bothered to concoct exculpatory euphemisms for the riots, such as Retail Mourning, Do-It-Yourself Reparations, or Arson for Equity.  Even last week a new report from a leftist think tank, the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project, admitting to the immense number of violent demonstrations during this Summer of George was spun by the media as proving that all those boarded-up shops near you don't exist.

WHEC Reporter Chased By Knife-Wielding BLM Mob — Station Ignores Attack And Describes 'Protests' As 'Peaceful'.  WHEC reporter Charles Molineaux was attacked and chased by a knife-wielding Black Lives Matter mob during "protests" on Sunday night in Rochester and yet his own news station ignored the incident and described the night's "protests" as "peaceful" on their front page.  Video shows Molineaux and his security guard getting attacked and called "Nazis" after apparently getting accused of being undercover cops.  An African-American man with a knife is seen running at them and threatening to stab them repeatedly, only backing down when Molineaux's security guard turns around to defend him with an expandable baton.  UPDATE:  The video was just deleted!

The Media Are Lying About The Election Again.  Election 2020 is shaping up to be déjà vu all over again for the news media.  In an effort to help push Joe Biden over the finish line, the Washington establishment is going all-in on the easily refuted idea that there has been no change in the presidential race over the last three weeks. [...] After having botched the entire news coverage of the 2016 election, where all the "experts" repeatedly told the American public that Donald Trump had little to no chance of being the Republican nominee and even less a chance of being elected president, corporate media are back at it again, insisting all is well with the Biden campaign and the Democrats are safely on cruise control to take the White House and the Senate.  Here's the truth they are not telling you.  Biden has little enthusiasm for his candidacy.  He is taking on an incumbent president with significant first-term accomplishments who has extremely energized supporters, to put it mildly.

Desperately Derailing Donald.  One always expects the media surprise leak of a purported hidden scandal as a presidential campaign winds down.  Remember the last-minute "discovery" of George W. Bush's undisclosed 24-year-old DUI arrest in 2000?  Or the October 7, 2016 effort of the Washington Post to publish the hoarded 11-year-old "Access Hollywood" tape, just two days before Donald Trump's second debate with Hillary Clinton?  We should expect lots of these "bombshells" and "walls are closing in" pseudo derailments.  Except Trump has been the most widely investigated, probed, attacked, and smeared president in history.  And so the scandal-field has pretty well been picked over, as those fired like Omarosa Manigault Newman, Anthony Scaramucci, John Bolton, and others have long ago more or less lectured us that Trump is nuts, crazy, dangerous, stupid, ignorant, and so forth.

New York Times' sleazy narrative on Trump is nothing but a joke:  Goodwin.  A former colleague at The New York Times once explained why he kept reading the paper even though he no longer trusted it:  "I want to see what they're up to."  What they're up to now is staggering.  Not content with four years of biased coverage of President Trump, the Times is plunging head first into new depths of partisanship and deceit. [...] We are long removed from any possible claim that Baquet's Times is fair and impartial.  He has single-handedly abolished more than a century of standards in pursuit of his white whale: defeating Donald Trump.  Baquet launched his quest in 2016 but his slant then seems almost restrained compared to his scheming now.  This time, the top editor has institutionalized a ruthless commitment to partisanship that I believe will someday be seen as rivaling the Times' historic scandals.  In the 1930s, the paper cozied up to Josef Stalin and ignored the famine in Ukraine, then downplayed the Holocaust and later supported the rise of Fidel Castro while hiding his commitment to communism.  Using distortions and duplicity to influence a presidential election deserves to be included in that roster of infamy.

Fox News Decides to Go Full CNN.  Over the last several days, a report from The Atlantic has been making the rounds.  In it are accusations that the President doesn't like John McCain (shocker), but more importantly, that he didn't want to visit a cemetery in France because he thinks dead soldiers are "losers."  As I laid out in my original debunking of this story, we already have documentary evidence from multiple sources, including some who hate Trump, that the reason for not going to the cemetery was purely about the weather.  No one has gone on record saying Trump said any of the things alleged, though some have gone on record to say it didn't happen.  Gen. Kelly, who is named as having heard the comments, has remained quiet despite having no reason to do so.  All of this points to the story being nonsense, or at the very least, extremely misleading (i.e. perhaps some ancillary part is true, like bagging on McCain).  Unfortunately, Fox News has decided to lower its journalistic standards to those of CNN and help push this garbage.

Here Are 31 Times The Media Pushed Narratives Downplaying Riots And Looting After George Floyd's Death.  Dozens of news outlets published content that either justified or explained away rioting and looting in the initial weeks of unrest following the police custody death of George Floyd in late May, a Daily Caller News Foundation review found.  While President Donald Trump and Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden have both condemned rioting and looting, major news outlets such as CNN and MSNBC have appeared to downplay the unrest that has gripped American cities in the months following Floyd's death, in one instance describing a scene as "mostly peaceful" as fires raged in the background.  But as the violence broke out in American cities in late May and June, dozens of news outlets provided a platform for commentators, professors and activists who not only acknowledged that rioting and looting were taking place, but sought to either justify the violence as a valid protesting technique or as a form of righteous rebellion against an unjust system.

Participant at Biden Event in Kenosha Admits She Was Given a "Paper" Telling Her What to Say.  We know that the Biden events are all staged and we now have more evidence.  Today in Kenosha, Wisconsin at a Biden event a woman admitted on camera that she was given a piece of paper telling her what to say: [...] The Biden team has managed their events by ensuring all comments and questions the former Obama VP is asked are pre-approved, and set up so that Biden can read the respective answers on the teleprompter.  Yesterday we saw this as well and every day for that matter.  The media and the Biden team work together as they manufacture events and try to make them look unscripted.

Gaslighting America:  Democrats And Media Have Turned It Up To 11.  The Democratic Party and its communications office have been telling the country for some time now that night is day and up is down.  But, with the election two months away, the psychological manipulation of the American voter has accelerated.  As we've written the past two days, Joe Biden has condemned the riots that have been wrecking cities and killing people since the May 25 death of George Floyd.  We're glad he finally got around to it.  Yet he and his party are acting as if they've opposed the violence all along and it's President Donald Trump who has failed to come out against it.  But Trump, of course, has been denouncing the riots since they began.  Even when the media were determined to convince us they were "mostly peaceful."

Evidence Shows the Media Doesn't Really Care About Evidence.  Read an article from any mainstream media outlet regarding an even remotely controversial subject broached by President Trump, and it is likely to include the statement, "President Trump claimed, without evidence..."  Use of the phrase is so frequent, it is likely that writers at the New York Times and elsewhere have it pop up in the auto-fill functionality on their laptops.  Type in "President Trump," and the words "claimed without evidence" automatically appear to the side in opaque font, and all they have to do is hit their arrow key to auto-fill the phrase.  The practice has become so prevalent in the media's wonderland that they no longer wait to include the phrase in the body of an article, they now put it right in their headlines.

As Biden falls in the polls, the media's lies get bigger.  The more desperate the media becomes to elect the corrupt, incompetent Joe Biden, the bigger and more numerous the lies.  We have been treated to Democrat campaign workers, posing as journalists, and other Democrats throwing [stuff] against the wall for five years to elect one corrupt Democrat after another.  No matter how obvious the lies become, the more they repeat them.  One of the biggest loads of excrement I have seen came out of the mouths of the Washington Post editorial board on Friday [8/28/2020] when they had the garbage headline "Global Freedom would suffer grievous harm in a second Trump Term."  They claim that this will happen because he embraces dictators and he is rejecting U.S. democracy.  They know they are lying because the facts show that it was Obama/Biden who catered throughout their eight years to dictators, and they know that Trump's policies and actions have been much harsher toward the dictators and tyrants.

The media and those who want to curry favor with the media have a dual agenda.  All of what has made the media even less trusted by the public than Congress and used car salesmen was on display last week with the reporting from Kenosha, Wisconsin.  Over the past few days due to the shooting of Jacob Blake, the media converged on the city using the same playbook that worked for them in Minneapolis earlier this summer.  First, spread misinformation and half-baked reporting, then help light the fuse for violent riots and social chaos, then staggeringly pretend that the protests are "fiery but mostly peaceful."  In the case of Blake, the initial reporting indicated that the man was simply walking away from police for no apparent reason before being shot seven times.  That reporting alone, with no context or additional information touched off a level of violence, looting, property damage, and physical harm more common to the nightly rioting in Chicago than a suburban community in Wisconsin.  A day later, the important facts that a responsible media might have sought out before reporting told a somewhat different story.  Blake's girlfriend had called police fearing for her and her children's safety.  Police attempted to calm the situation, but when Blake continued to be perceived as a threat, police attempted to use a taser.  Blake ran to his car and police believe he was reaching for a knife when he was shot.  No doubt, the police use of force must be part of this investigation.  But none of the above facts that would have added important context were part of any initial reporting on the scene, creating a very different narrative that played into the hands of Black Lives Matter terrorists and Antifa scum headed to Kenosha on Monday.

What does 'without evidence' mean?  President Trump spoke mildly in defense of Kenosha shooter Kyle Rittenhouse on Tuesday, saying that the 17-year-old seemed to be defending himself when he shot three people, killing two of them.  NPR, fresh off of interviewing In Defense of Looting author Vicky Osterweil, had something stern to say about that, tweeting 'President Trump declined to condemn the actions of the suspected 17-year-old shooter of three protesters against police brutality in Kenosha — claiming, without evidence, that it appeared the gunman was acting in self-defense.'  Without evidence!  Cockburn tries to live an upright life these days, but he had to pause for a moment to be sure he had not mistakenly consumed peyote or some other mind-altering substance.  Without evidence?  The entire Rittenhouse episode was caught on tape.  You can watch both shootings on YouTube, along with lengthy dissections of what they show.  You can watch him get interviewed immediately before the shooting.  Without evidence?  Kyle Rittenhouse's night in Kenosha is one of the single best-documented shootings of all time.

Larry Schweikart:  How the 24-Hour News Cycle is Leading the Loss of the English Language.  Plenty of commentators have dealt with the lunacy that affects the English language today, from banning certain words as "racist," "sexist," or "something-ist."  Certainly that's obvious to all.  But there is another, more subtle change going on, even among the "friendly" or "reliable news pages.  It began when the 24-hour news cycle started to run out of, well, news.  It took more than a decade for this development to settle in.  At first, the networks filled the void with simply more talking heads, guests, and "analysts" telling you what the news was.  More recently however — I started really noticing it during the Mueller investigation — a host of non-news words began to creep into news stories.  We began to see mush phrases such as "Mueller mulling demand that Trump testify," or "Mueller considering charging Don, Jr."  These kinds of hourly non-news stories utterly took over, for reporters weren't supposed to know what was happening in the first place (the investigation after all — wink, wink, nudge, nudge — was to be secret.  Since the Mueller team was leaking like the Titanic however, so-called journalists could not produce actual documents to prove anything.  As it turned out, in fact, they had nothing to prove anything with.  Instead, reporters reverted to the post-1980 favorite journalistic trick, the "unnamed source."  Realize it was not all that long ago that no reputable newspaper would ever run a piece with a single "anonymous source."  Indeed, according to a Chicago Tribune reporter I interviewed during a foreword I wrote for Professor Jim Kuypers' book, Partisan Journalism (2013), every major fact in a story was to be doubly sourced with public sources.  In case you didn't notice, "mulling," "considering," "poised to," "about to," "prepared to," "intends," and other such mush words are utterly unprovable.

Black Assimilation Is The Great Threat To Democrats.  If there was one moment during the Republican convention that caused my official Daily Wire Leftist Tears Tumbler to magically overflow, it was in a speech by former Ambassador to the U.N. Nikki Haley.  "In much of the Democratic Party, it's now fashionable to say that America is racist," Haley said.  "That is a lie.  America is not a racist country."  Democrats and the media — but I repeat myself — reacted swiftly.  "I'm just hung up a little bit about Nikki Haley," said hung up ABC Anchor Linsey Davis.  "A comment that she made, 'America is not a racist country.'  I think that that's a statement that a lot of black people, black and brown people, would take umbrage with."  Chicago Tribune columnist Dahleen Glanton was blunter, saying the statement made Haley "appear to be either disgracefully ignorant or a blatant liar."  But, of course, what Haley really was, was completely correct.  There is a history of institutional racism in America, no doubt, but today our country is wholly free of it.  The U.S. is easily the least racist nation on the planet.

The Editor says...
This country is NOT "wholly free" of institutional racism.  What do you call this?  And this And this? Is Kwanzaa an American institution?  Is Black History Month an American institution?

If you want to see media malice in a single article....  The second night of the Republican convention has come and gone (and very successfully too) but what should live forever is the article the New York Times wrote about the line-up of speakers for the evening.  It is a triumph of misdirection and fraud by omission.  It may well be the most perfect example ever of how the media functions, not to inform, but to mislead.  The article, entitled "How to Watch the Republican National Convention," gives practical advice about how to find the convention on the internet and television.  Interestingly, it does not mention C-SPAN, which is proving to be a preferred venue for many conservative viewers.  What's really fascinating, though, is what the Times says and does not say about some of the speakers.

The Dangerous Half-Truths Behind 'The Joe Show'.  If you watched last week's Democratic National Convention you couldn't help but notice an overwhelming theme that ran throughout "the Joe Show".  The well-produced and heartwarming images of the former Vice-President were front and center, evoking sympathy and admiration for a man who has endured multiple tragedies throughout his half-century career in politics.  But those images were also on display to underscore the belief amongst the overwhelming number of Democrats, who, united only in their disdain for President Trump, believe him to be, at best, morally inept, and at worst, actively evil.  By shining a light on "Saint Joe," they cast a shadow on the man who currently occupies the Oval Office, a man who is apparently both all-powerful and simultaneously incompetent.  A man who CNN would have you believe single-handedly spread the coronavirus from coast to coast, all but ensuring that countless Americans would find themselves unemployed in the economic downturn that followed.

New York Times Manipulates FBI Lawyer's Guilty Plea To Hide Real Spygate News.  A New York Times reporter who won a Pulitzer Prize for his role perpetrating the Russia collusion hoax was tasked with framing the news that a former top FBI lawyer was to plead guilty to deliberately fabricating evidence against a Donald Trump campaign affiliate targeted in the Russia probe.  The resulting article is a case study in how to write propaganda.  Adam Goldman broke, and cushioned, the news that former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith was to plead guilty to fabricating evidence in a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant application to spy on Trump campaign affiliate Carter Page.  His job was to present the news as something other than an indictment of the FBI's handling of the Russia collusion hoax, to signal to other media that they should move on from the story as quickly as possible, and to hide his own newspaper's multi-year participation in the Russia collusion hoax.  One intelligence source described it as an "insult" to his intelligence and "beyond Pravda," a reference to the official newspaper of the Communist Party in the Soviet Union.  Here's how Goldman did it. [...]

ABC/NBC Stoke Conspiracy:  Trump Creating 'Mail-In Voting Scandal,' a 'Crisis'.  Setting the stage for their excuse if President Trump won reelection, ABC's Good Morning America and NBC's Sunday Today [8/16/2020] spent the morning accusing the President of a conspiracy to steal the 2020 election.  ABC called it the "mail-in voting scandal" while NBC dubbed it the "Postal Service crisis;" accusing Postmaster General Louis DeJoy of allegedly doing Trump's dirty work, even though they admit they don't have any hard evidence of wrongdoing.  Near the top of ABC's coverage of the purported scandal, White House correspondent Rachel Scott leaned on serial liars Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) and Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) to make the baseless accusations:

Democrats Go Postal with Busted Mailbox Conspiracy Theory.  Democrats have spent several days flogging the false "mailbox conspiracy" theory that President Donald Trump is deliberately crippling the U.S. Postal Service so that it cannot handle votes by mail in November — even forcing it to remove mailboxes.  The truth is that the mailboxes were removed because mailboxes are always being removed.  At least 14,000 were removed during the Obama-Biden administration.  Democrats are creating a new hysteria to cast Trump as a tyrant and motivate their conspiracy-theory-addled voters.

Don't Let the Fake Fact Checkers Fool You — Joe and Kamala Support Gun Confiscation.  Just like Joe Biden, vice presidential hopeful Kamala Harris supports outright, mandatory gun confiscation.  She just disguises it under a couple of flowery words: "mandatory" and "buyback."  This of course is when all of the fake media's fake fact checkers pour out of the woodwork to lie with the false claim Kamala Harris Never Said She Wanted to Confiscate Guns.  We know the fake fact checkers are going to publish their fake fact checks with their fake claims because that's what the fake fact checkers did to protect their precious Barry Obama, who also said he wanted to confiscate your guns.  Further, the fake fact checkers published lies to protect Hillary Clinton, who also said she wanted to confiscate your guns.  Oh, and Joe Biden said he wanted to confiscate your gun, and he also used flowery words about "buybacks," and as you will see below, he has not taken that sentiment back, even after the fake media tried to help him cover up that fact.

Yamiche Alcindor Cements Her Place as Most Dishonest 'Journalist' After Cutting Trump Quote.  There are a lot of dishonest journalists out there, and I mean a lot of them.  To narrow it down is a bit like trying to split an atom.  Sure, it's possible, but man is it difficult.  Yet, PBS' Yamiche Alcindor continues to stand above the rest, both because of her penchant to outright lie, and her tendency to use her race as a shield.  Who can forget this classic on the recent rioting, of which Alcindor assured us there was no evidence they are anarchists.  Hilariously, she was then bombarded with pictures of people present wearing anarchist symbols.  [Tweet]  And here she is trying to cancel the black Surgeon General over an innocuous plea to not do drugs and alcohol.  Her shtick is to provide "context" while never defining who exactly she's talking about.  It's a cheap game some journalists play when they want to editorialize but want to pretend it's not editorializing.  [Another tweet]  Alcindor is attempting to up her game, though.  Yesterday, she purposely cut the context out of a Trump quote so she could proclaim it a "moment to behold."  [Yet another tweet]

Touting Kamala Harris as a moderate is a liberal dose of deception.  The New York Times was quick out of the blocks with the Democratic pitch that Kamala Harris is a "pragmatic moderate."  It's pulling your leg.  Joe Biden's running mate had the most liberal voting record in the Senate last year — surpassing even Bernie Sanders — according to government watchdog GovTrack.  Harris advocates late-term abortion, thinks Catholics are not fit to serve on the Supreme Court, has tried to criminalize climate-change denial and the manufacture of guns, wants to give taxpayer-funded health care to illegal immigrants and, as California's attorney general, wielded power like a callous autocrat.  But, if by pragmatic, the Times means this Barack Obama protegé will be whatever you want her to be, it's correct.  Her record shows her to be a gifted shapeshifter.

AG Barr On Far-Left Extremism:  Media Is Censoring What's Happening, Americans Are Being 'Told A Lie'.  Attorney General William Barr told Fox News host Mark Levin during an interview Sunday that the mainstream media are lying about the far-left violence that has been playing out in the streets across America over recent weeks.  "We have the citizen reporters, who have these videos of these events, which are quite different than what we get a lot of times from the media, which seems to be censoring the violence," Levin said to Barr.  "No?"  "Absolutely.  Their narrative — they are projecting a narrative," Barr said.  "When the word narrative came into currency, I knew we were in trouble, because the word narrative really suggests that there's no objective truth.  There's no real story of what happened, it's just everyone has their own narrative."  "And you get to then — the press can justify presenting a story that doesn't really correspond to objective truth, but it's our narrative.  We have a narrative, you have a narrative," Barr continued.  "I've been appalled at — on this violence, because it's happening right out in the streets, anyone with eyes can see what's happening.  They see the violence."

'Defund the Police' is a media fantasy.  If you've paid any attention to the news, particularly cable news, over the last couple of months since George Floyd's killing by police in Minneapolis, you might think "defunding" or "abolishing" the police is a widely held and even somewhat mainstream desire.  Gallup suggests this is untrue.  The vast majority of Americans of all races and ethnicities don't want the police to leave their communities.

7-year-old boy in Georgia died 'from COVID-19'? Media leaving out key details.  [Scroll down]  So it seems that the boy died not "from COVID-19," but rather as the result of a seizure and a fall in the shower.  It seems that, prior to his death, the child had zero Wuhan virus symptoms, and that after he was pronounced dead, "a rapid test showed evidence of COVID-19 positivity."  I don't know about you, but I've followed the news and the science on this virus as closely as most anyone, and I have yet to hear any reports of the Wuhan virus causing seizures.  If this were the case — especially where children are concerned — it is a virtual guarantee that the media would have daily told us so.  It would seem that fair and accurate reporting of this incident would include all of the circumstances surrounding this terrible tragedy and that this is almost certainly another example of someone dying with the Wuhan virus and not from it.  All the media have done here is give us another reason not to trust them in this grave matter.

America's Most Gullible Journalist:  "Visit Portland!".  Whom to believe?  Videos of the riots?  Or smug journalists telling us that they saw nothing untoward?  Luckily, there's the Newspaper of Record to give us the truth.  Unluckily, The New York Times sent ... Nicholas Kristof, aka the most easily fooled journalist in America.  Kristof assured Times readers that the Portland crowds are "entirely peaceful," until around 11 p.m., when "some protesters begin to shoot fireworks or set small trash fires."  Small trash fires.  Also: the federal courthouse, the Justice Center offices, statues, the Portland police union hall, and a decapitated pig's head, among other arsons.  But Kristof also dismissively remarked:  "No, they're not trying to burn down the federal courthouse."  Do not trust the dozens of videos showing protesters trying to burn down the federal courthouse.  He further reports that — just as MSNBC has said! — "the most violent behavior overwhelmingly comes from the federal agents."  So there you have it.  You can believe the man who said, "Mao's legacy is not all bad," or you can believe your lying eyes.

Floyd Bodycam Leak Highlights Press Collusion With Government.  The British Daily Mail on Monday scooped American news media with the leaked police body cam footage.  To be clear, the footage does not exonerate the police officers although it provides considerable context not previously available.  Floyd refused several police orders including not making his hands visible during the initial traffic stop to resisting entering a patrol car.  In the video, Floyd complains about difficulty breathing before the infamous knee-on-the-neck pose.  His shortness of breath may have been a symptom of an advancing drug overdose that ultimately may have contributed to his death.  The autopsy indicated a quantity of 11 ng/mL of fentanyl in Floyd's blood.  One study of 143 postmortem analyses of fentanyl overdoses found a median level of 9.8ng/mL in the blood of people believed to have died from overdosing on the drug.  Setting that aside, the way in which the new information came to light is further indication that American news media cannot be trusted to cover and report facts.

The Perils of Pretending a War is Something Else.  [Scroll down]  Here's an equally scary current charade:  the straight-faced claim by Democrat leaders and their media enablers that there are only "peaceful protests" in the streets of our 400 torched cities — no riots, looting and arsons, no rioters, looters and arsonists associated with Black Lives Matter and Antifa communists.  Instead, the denial that the mayhem which has injured thousands and cost more than a dozen lives are only possible because of the support of lawless Democrat mayors and city councils who are preoccupied with disarming the police. [...] The fact that there have been no serious attempts by "peaceful protesters" to denounce the violence and the organizations that perpetrated it — speaks volumes to the effect that they consider themselves allies of the rioters and share their agendas.  Defunding the police, leaving the most vulnerable in society without protection against criminals is the goal of rioters, arsonists, looters, and so-called "peaceful protesters."  The charade protects the criminals and their crimes.

ABC Ignores Leaked Video of George Floyd Arrest; CBS & NBC Caught Editing Out "Stop Resisting".  Body cam footage from the arrest of George Floyd has been leaked.  But instead of leaking through a U.S. media outlet, the footage was given to the U.K.'s Daily Mail, which posted the footage online.  Why would someone give the body cam footage to a foreign media entity?  Well... we can't know for certain, but we have a pretty good guess:  whoever leaked this footage KNEW that the American fake news media would IGNORE this story.  And for the most part, they have.  ABC News spiked the story completely.  And CBS and NBC were both caught editing out parts of the body cam footage that go against the national BLM narrative.

America is engaged in a religious war.  [Scroll down]  Marxism also has its saints and martyrs.  In classic Marxism, they would have been poor people exploited by evil capitalists.  In America, however, with its extraordinary economic and social mobility, that's not going to fly.  Instead, the saints and martyrs are racial figures.  Trayvon Martin is transformed from a violent, drugged-out, small-time thug into a childish, smiling figure who could have been the son of America's black president.  Michael Brown is not a hulking figure who engaged in strong-arm robbery and tried to steal a police officer's weapon.  He's a "gentle giant."  And lastly, George Floyd is not a violent felon and petty criminal who held a gun against a pregnant woman's stomach, and who was so hopped up on fentanyl and a variety of other intoxicants that it's unlikely he would have survived the night (and his inability to breath[e] probably arose from acute fentanyl intoxication).  Instead, he's a beloved family man whose image blooms on urban walls across America.

Sorry, Wearing Masks Is Anything but Harmless.  Here are 5 Reasons Why.  [#3] The establishment media makes it a point to run headlines containing meaningless scary-sounding factoids and manipulative stories about those who've allegedly succumbed to the virus.  When its supposed death tally was climbing, we couldn't escape hearing about it.  As it started to fall, they started ignoring the number of deaths and shifted over to reporting about rising cases, also neglecting to mention that rising cases and falling deaths is a good thing.  The media has done nothing to make the public aware that a local CBS affiliate looked into 589 alleged Palm Beach fatalities and discovered that far less than a third (169) had actually died of the virus.  Nor have they reported that the COVID-19 death tally they terrorized the nation with for months includes motor-cycle fatalities and gunshot victims.  Most people who did hear about these stories were shocked.  But, if the press had been doing its job, they wouldn't have been.  Another crucial fact of which they've failed to inform the public is that counting vast numbers who didn't die from COVID-19 among its fatalities is a feature, not a bug.  Everyone who dies with the virus is being counted as dying from it.

How It's Done:  Colorado Reporter Puts on a Clinic in How to Accurately Report on Violent Rioters.  As we've previously documented, the gaslighting from the MSM on the violent left-wing riots that have taken place in Democrat-run parts of the country over the last two months has been absolutely out of control.  There is literally not a day that goes by where there is not some glaring instance of a media outlet like the New York Times or Reuters painting protests as "mostly peaceful" or otherwise "dying down" until federal law enforcement officers have the nerve to step in to stop the anarchy.  Violent agitators in these reports are almost always referred to as "protesters."  Along with that, excuses are often made for their violent actions, as though just the mere presence of state and/or federal law enforcement officers on the scene to protect innocent citizens and federal property is excuse enough for the agitators to try and blind them with laser beams and hurt them with the nail-studded projectiles they hurl.  One Colorado reporter, however, went against the MSM "peaceful protester" grain in a recent report he filed on the Aurora, CO protests and riots that happened over the weekend.

No, New York did not get coronavirus 'under control'.  Someone is going to have to explain how exactly the media are defining "under control" as it pertains to the coronavirus because it's a phrase that appears to mean nothing.  Reuters over the weekend continued the campaign to rehabilitate Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo's image by asserting, as other news outlets have laughably done before, that New York is in tip-top shape, especially compared to that Republican-led state Florida.  (Ew!)  "The surge in Florida has continued as the state's Republican Governor Ron DeSantis has repeatedly said he will not make mask-wearing mandatory and that schools must reopen in August," Reuters reported on Sunday [7/26/2020].  "On the contrary, New York state has managed to get the virus under control, with stores and restaurants shuttered and the wearing of masks mandatory."

Trusting the Election to the Mr. and Ms. Potato Heads of the Left-Media.  Florida and Texas combined have more than 55 electoral votes. [...] It seems very likely that in 2020 Florida could go either way — either [D]emocrat or [R]epublican.  Texas seems to present an even greater threat to [D]emocrats. [...] We don't see left-leaning, liberal media outlets publishing articles with headlines reading, "Texas — Lower Concentration of COVID-19 Infections than 19 other States" or "Seven States/Territories with higher COVID-19 Death Rates than Florida."  Headlines like these might indicate that Trump is handling the COVID-19 Crisis adequately.  CNN and their "Mr./Ms. Potato Head" Common-tators (pun intended), reporters, editors, and writers are not working to educate the U.S. population with neutral, unbiased information about Florida and Texas, the two key states in the 2020 presidential election.  However, they are working to campaign for the left, for the Democrats.  They are working to push a non-Trump, non-Republican, pro-panic agenda, and they are doing it to sabotage President Trump and the Republican Party.

Are Fake News Polls Hiding a Potential Trump Landslide?  Listen to network or cable news and you will hear that the November election is over.  Joe Biden has a growing double-digit lead over President Trump, despite the election being over three months away and the issues that may decide the election largely unknown at present.  What do the polls say?  Biden's campaign manager, also known as CNN, has their "poll of polls" described as, "the five most recent national telephone polls measuring the view of registered voters."  Considering that only 58 percent of eligible voters went to the polls in 2016, CNN's "poll of polls" may not be particularly representative of the electorate.  CNN's headline screams déjà vu, "Biden maintains a double-digit lead over Trump nationally."  That's it then, the election is over.  Trump supporters may as well pack it up and stay home.  At least that is what they want you to believe.

Florida Is A Case Study In Media-Induced COVID-19 Panic.  What do all these news accounts have in common?  "Florida Sets Yet Another Coronavirus Record: 173 Deaths In A Day."  "A record 173 Floridians died from the virus Thursday, an average of more than one every eight minutes."  "The 134 new confirmed deaths is the second-largest increase on record, coming five days after the largest one-day jump of 156 last week."  "COVID-19 has ravaged Florida, with more than 237,000 people testing positive and 2,013 dying from the virus in July alone."  So what characteristic do all of the reports share?  They are all false.  It is not true that 173 people died from COVID-19 "in a day" in Florida.  Nor did 134, or 156 on previous days.  It is also untrue than 2,013 had died in July when that story was published.  All of these scary headlines are based on the number of deaths reported by the state on any given day.  This is not the same as the number of deaths that occurred on those days.

Florida: Death Related to a Gun Shot Wound and Deaths from Weeks Ago Are Suddenly Counted as Covid Deaths in Official Mortality Reporting.  The miscounting and fraudulent numbers related to the China coronavirus just keep coming.  Unrelated deaths are being counted as COVID-19 related and deaths from days and weeks ago are suddenly being attributed to today's COVID-19 mortality counts.

A Put-Up Job.  [Scroll down]  The news matters for three reasons.  First, almost all the public investigation and damaging narrative about "Trump-Russia collusion" came after investigators knew how little supporting evidence there was.  Second, the more we learn about the ensuing investigations, the more they look like concerted abuses of government authority.  We give law-enforcement and intelligence agencies tremendous power so they can protect us; when they abuse that power, they need to be held accountable and reined in.  That seldom happens to anyone in Washington's sprawling bureaucracies, which protect their own within the gurgling ecosystem of power, profit, regulation, and rent-seeking.  Just ask Lois Lerner.  Third, when the FBI, Department of Justice, and intelligence agencies act in biased, partisan, and illicit ways, they cut to the very heart of our constitutional democracy, damage our institutions, and undermine trust in them.  That is exactly what happened in 2016 and afterward.  Public trust was undermined by these prolonged investigations and the narrative about them.  It will be undermined further as we learn how the investigators themselves likely pursued partisan goals, ignored crucial evidence, and broke laws to do it.

The Constitution, Donald Trump, and 2020.  [The news media] would have us ignore the multiple scenes of violence and misplaced anger displayed through more objective and independent sources.  The protests were "mostly peaceful" chirped CNN, even as a crowd broke the glass of its Atlanta headquarters and ransacked it.  The real troublemakers were not the legitimate protestors, MSNBC reassured its remaining viewers, but actually white supremacists who had deftly infiltrated Black Lives Matter protests in a dozen plus cities to spread violence and wreak havoc.  Pay no attention to the extensive video footage showing protestors of all stripes and colors performing stupefying acts of vandalism.  Although most of the major media outlets long ago ceased dispensing accurate information to the American citizenry, they nevertheless have retained just enough viewers to help fan the flames of this 21st-century Bonfire of the Vanities.  They also continue to press and fold weak-minded politicians like threadbare laundry.

The Big Surge In Coronavirus Deaths Is A Media-Fed Myth.  Almost daily now we've been reading about how daily deaths from COVID-19 have reached record highs.  It's a scary prospect.  But the truth is the mainstream press is grossly misleading the public by misreporting the death counts. [...] According to PBS in Arizona, the state "on Saturday (July 18) set a record for coronavirus-related deaths reported in one day, with 147, according to the Arizona Department of Health Services."  The last story is particularly illuminating because the website the PBS article links to includes a chart of daily deaths in the state.  It lists only six deaths on July 19.  What's more, the chart shows that there have only been two days where deaths exceeded 65.  So where did that scary 147 number come from?  The same place all the other "surging" numbers come from.  Each day Arizona and other states file reports on how many people died from COVID-19.  It's not a measure of how many died that day.  In most cases, the people died days or even weeks earlier.  In fact, in Arizona's case, 106 of the reported deaths on Saturday resulted from a periodic review of death certificates.  None of those caveats made it into the PBS story.

Trans man sues hospital after hysterectomy is canceled.  A transgender man is suing the University of Maryland Medical System in federal court, claiming his rights were violated when his gender-affirming surgery was canceled by one of the hospital system's subsidiaries.

The Editor says...
A "transgender man" is a woman who pretends to be a man.  The term "gender-affirming surgery" is an inversion of the truth.  Those are two lies in the first sentence alone.

How to Spank the Establishment Media.  If one disapproves of the lying and distortions put out by the mainstream media, there's a way to fight it: don't pay for it.  But how, you might ask, can I do that?  Well, "Meet the Press" is pumped out by NBC News.  So, if you object to the lies on NBC News or to the lies on its vile sister, MSNBC, then you might consider financially spanking the company that ultimately owns them... Comcast.  If Comcast cannot bring itself to do anything about its news operations, then it would be up to viewers to send the corporation a message.  There are several ways to do this.  The most obvious way is to drop Xfinity, Comcast's cable service.  And here's what's nice about that: if one switches to a different cable company, one is likely to get a special price for the first year or more.  There are a few folks who "game the system" by periodically changing their cable provider just to take advantage of introductory deals.  Changing providers might be a hassle, but at least one won't be enriching NBC's parent company.

Lower than dirt?  Jon Turley clears up who is worse, NBC News' Chuck Todd or CNN's Jim Acosta.  Legal scholar Jonathan Turley slammed NBC News' Chuck Todd for airing a "false narrative" in the misleading quote of White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany.  The George Washington University law professor called out the "Meet the Press" host who "knowingly played a false gotcha clip" in a move that he deemed worse than the one by CNN's Jim Acosta, who came under heavy fire for tweeting an out-of-context quote from McEnany.

Media told America FBI had proof of collusion as bureau was realizing it had nothing.  Despite what The New York Times and Washington Post were loudly reporting in early 2017, the FBI had failed to find any evidence of Trump-Russia "collusion" — and indeed had found that the central source of those claims was a joke.  This is a key takeaway from the Justice Department's latest release of documents from the FBI's investigation.  One shocker is the summary of the long FBI interview that January with the "Primary Subsource" for the infamous Steele dossier — indeed, about the only source.

Fake News Becomes a Way of Life.  In December 2016, Ben Smith, then BuzzFeed's editor-in-chief, wrote a memo to his staff that was meant to be a kind of charter for the dawning of the Trump Era.  In truth it spoke to and aimed to speak for the entire mainstream media.  Smith would eventually move on to the New York Times, which elevated him to a role as the supervisory voice of conscience for the whole media.  But that December, he warned his staff of the danger of fake news, and the need of the media to be accurate and factual.

Chris Wallace Is Wrong, Joe Biden Does Want to Defund the Police.  Social media is abuzz over the release of a clip of President Trump's interview with Fox News' Chris Wallace, where the Fox News host "fact-checked" Trump's claim that Joe Biden wants to defund the police.  "It's gotten totally out of control and it's really because they want to defund the police, and Biden wants to defund the police," Trump said in the clip.  "Sir, he does not," Wallace shot back.  You can watch the exchange below. [...]

Kayleigh McEnany is so effective that the MSM now lying by deceptively editing her comments.  Yesterday [7/16/2020] saw a new low in irresponsible media reporting on a briefing by a presidential press secretary.  Many media outlets outright lied about what Kayleigh McEnany said by cutting her off mid-sentence in a comment on schools reopening, thereby creating an impression that was opposite of the truth. [...] Kayleigh McEnany has been devastatingly effective as President Trump's press secretary, holding the media accountable for their lies and letting viewers of her press briefings know what questions the pressies are not asking but should.  This campaign of lies is evidence that the MSM knows she is a threat to their ability to fulfill their political function as propagandists and have decided to unite in lies about her.

The New York Times Has Been Ridiculous for a Long Time.  The much discussed resignation letter from New York Times op-ed editor Bari Weiss was written in the metaphorical equivalent of Braille.  It allowed even the blind to see what the rest of us have known for years:  the Times is a joke.  Writes Weiss of the Times newsroom, "Truth isn't a process of collective discovery, but an orthodoxy already known to an enlightened few whose job is to inform everyone else."  Indeed, the only difference between the Times and the old Soviet Pravda is that Pravda readers knew they were being lied to.

America's Reporters and Editors Are Liars.  It is impossible to overstate how low "journalism" has fallen in the United States. [...] A sound adage holds that you should never assume malice when stupidity is a sufficient explanation.  Here, the only explanation is malice.  No one is as stupid as America's reporters and editors pretend to be.  The sooner their companies go out of business, the better.

MSNBC Thinks the Russia Hoax Will Still Work on You in 2020.  As the 2020 presidential election fast approaches, so do media attempts to incite voter hysteria about the chances of it being stolen.  On Tuesday's Morning Joe, dutiful MSNBC co-host Willie Geist brought on left-wing author David Shimer and former Obama Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson to try to rebuild the Russian election interference narrative.  [Video clip]

Fake news!
Did the [New York] Times Print an Urban Legend?  This week, the Times brings us a story from Methodist Hospital in San Antonio.  The headline is:  "Texas Hospital Says Man, 30, Died After Attending a 'Covid Party,'" and what we get is a story with one source. [...] It's a morality tale, really.  Don't believe it's a hoax!  Or that you aren't at risk because you are young!  Maybe don't live in a bad red state where they aren't taking COVID seriously, or go to these parties.  The only thing missing was a MAGA hat and a rueful dying admission, "I shouldn't have trusted Trump or my Republican governor!"  But, as I read the story originally earlier this week, I realized the details didn't quite add up.  If you believe COVID is a hoax, why would you attend a "Covid Party?"  And, in a pandemic for an airborne disease, aren't all parties potentially COVID parties?  Chicken pox parties were aimed at spreading a local infection purposely to younger children who have milder cases.  People don't hold them because they are skeptics.  Something doesn't make sense.

It's just nuts to praise New York's 'success' against coronavirus.  If only the rest of the country could handle COVID as well as New York:  That's the lament of progressive commentators as COVID cases spike in the Sun Belt and the South.  Washington Post columnist Jennifer Rubin hailed New York City the other day after it reported no deaths for the first time during the pandemic.  This is what competent government can accomplish, she gushed.  Former Obama aide Valerie Jarrett tweeted, "Short term sacrifice saves lives!!!" [...] This is all perverse given that New York is only now emerging from one of the worst COVID debacles on the planet.

David French Reveals The Depth Of Intellectual Dishonesty Needed For The NeverTrumpers' Vituperation of Roger Stone.  David French has written a deeply dishonest story today about the prosecution of Roger Stone, and how the commutation of his sentence by Pres.  Trump doesn't change the "facts" of the case.  Well, if you're looking for "facts", David French's "story" isn't the place to start.

Behind the Media's Breathtakingly Dishonest Coverage.  "I don't think I've ever seen such dishonest and biased coverage of any event."  That was Brit Hume, who has been covering events for more than 50 years for Fox News, ABC News and investigative reporter Jack Anderson.  The event, as you may have guessed, was President Donald Trump's Independence (without the scare-quotes) Day speech at Mount Rushmore.  The speech was, according to The New York Times, a "dark and divisive speech" designed to deliver a "divisive culture war message."  The Washington Post called it a "dystopian speech" and a "push to amplify racism."  Absent from their stories were quotations supporting racism.  Nor did Illinois Democratic Sen. Tammy Duckworth supply any quotations to support her claim that Trump "spent all his time talking about dead traitors."  Trump mentioned no Confederates but did quote the "Battle Hymn of the Republic."

The most dishonest, biased news coverage of our lifetimes — and it's about to get worse.  What really seems to have raised the press' hackles was Trump's dissent from their reverent attitudes toward Black Lives Matter and apparent indifference to those tearing down statues of Lincoln, Douglass, Grant, abolitionists and women's-rights advocates.  "Angry mobs are trying to tear down statues of our Founders, deface our most sacred memorials and unleash a wave of violent crime in our cities," Trump said, accurately.  That's not the message most in the media want voters receiving in the months running up to November.

The Media and 2020: Deja vu All Over Again.  Over the past few months, the New York Times and the Washington Post scorned those who wanted to reopen their businesses after investing their entire livelihood into them, because they realized that destroying the Trump economy would hurt him at the polls in November. [...] The media that has been so dishonest in covering the health pandemic and the riots is now claiming that Trump's reelection prospects are falling apart due to his slumping poll numbers.  In reality, they are struggling to find positive things to write about Joe Biden, so they need to continue to deflect any coverage of him by attributing failures to Trump. [...] Before the coronavirus came over from China, the Trump economy was booming, so naturally they chose to ignore it.  They never cared to mention the more than 7 million new jobs that were created since his election, or a rising income for median households that grew by $1,834 in the first ten months of 2019, or the 1.4 million Americans who were lifted out of poverty.

This Is How the Media Lies to the American People:  The Carsyn Leigh Davis Coronavirus Story.  We really are at a point in America that you can no longer trust the mainstream media on even the most basic reporting.  They will always put their personal spin on a story to sway your thinking.  Florida teenager Carsyn Leigh Davis died on June 23rd in Fort Myers, Florida from "complications from coronavirus." [...] This is the latest example of the panic porn promoted by the liberal mainstream media.  What the media is hiding from the public in their headline is that Carsyn battled cancer and suffered from an auto-immune disease.  Her parents gave Carsyn hydroxychloroquine but the 17-year-old succumbed to the disease anyway.  It's not until you read into the reporting that you find out about Carsyn's battle with disease.  The headlines were specifically written to make you feel that teens are at great risk.  They're not.

The media says hospitals are out of beds, but here is the real story.  [Scroll down]  In a recent report by Miami-Dade, it shows that they have a capacity of 434 ICU beds typically.  The other interesting number is that they can convert 532 additional beds to ICU beds if needed.  So the media would have you to believe that they are entirely out of ICU beds, but that's simply not the case.  Yes, this is a strain on the healthcare system.  Yes, the virus has spread much more than previous, but we need to be honest, we knew it would.  In every instance of guidance that was given by the CDC, the information was clear.  Extreme measures would only slow the spread of the virus.  Every safety precaution that is taken only attempts to slow the spread; it does not stop the spread.  Many states and the media are pushing the initiative that wearing masks and handwashing will stop the spread of coronavirus.  The truth is, it cannot stop the virus.  There is not a magic fabric or chemical in hand sanitizer that prevents it.  We can only try to contain it.  This is where the mainstream media and many state health leaders have continued to mislead the American people.

COVID Deaths Plummet, But the So-Called News Remains Negative.  Now, let's get into some COVID-19 news and, folks, are you asking yourself what of any of this is true and what isn't?  It's almost like the tale of two viruses.  We have an entire group of stories that are about how much worse the virus is. "[...] It's worse than we thought.  We haven't even gotten to the second wave.  Dr. Fauci says, Dr. Fauci says, Dr. Fauci says."  Whatever Dr. Fauci says, it gets amplified.  We are told how so many more people are getting it.  The number of cases is skyrocketing, but then deaths are down.  We demonstrated this yesterday.  The number of deaths associated with COVID-19 are way down.  It's why they're not being reported.  The game here is to scare you into siding up with a new lockdown.  They want you to hear all these brand-new numbers of cases as deaths.  But deaths are down.  The curve was flattened.

The Media Outright Lied About Hydroxychloroquine Just to Destroy Trump.  The media has spent the last four months outright lying about the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine just to destroy President Donald Trump.  Washington D.C. journalist Drew Holden recently took the time to compile a large number of stories built entirely on lies pushed by the left-wing media.  Holden jumped to his Twitter account with an amazing thread that has to be seen to see the lies spread by our sold-out, anti-American media.

America Must Hold the Corrupt News Media Accountable in Order to Survive.  We must find a way to hold the corrupt corporate news media accountable before they destroy our country.  That's been a consistent theme here at Today's Campaign Update for four years now (today is the 4th anniversary of the very first Campaign Update posted on my Facebook page during the heat of the 2016 campaign), and it has become more urgent than ever.  Because, as I noted yesterday, the media literally has the deaths of an untold number of Americans on its hands due to its focused disinformation campaign related to Hydroxychloroquine.

How the Left Creates Fake Studies to Fabricate Right-Wing Terrorism.  After weeks of violence, Democrats have some public relations needs to redirect attention away from the awfulness of leftism.  Insert the latest report from the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), which concludes that the greatest domestic threat comes not from leftists or Muslims, but from right-wing terrorists!  The CSIS study's findings are not new.  The New America Foundation (NAF) and the Center of Investigative Reporting (CIR) have published similar studies with the same conclusions.  Each study is fake, but the most recent CSIS study is the most pathetic of them all — partly because the CSIS doesn't provide a list of incidents to fact-check.  Just trust them.  There's an art to creating this type of propaganda, which provides the Democrat narrative a halo of credibility.  A tremendous volume of subtle manipulation is concocted within studies on right-wing terrorism, and each demonstrates variations of the same basic formula.

Univision Must Retract Story On June 2020 Jobs Report.  If ever there were doubts that Univision is an activist organization passing itself off as a journalistic entity, then look no further than its reporting on the jobs report for June 2020.  Watch below as the network hides one big piece of news with relevance to the Hispanic community, then completely and blatantly misrepresent another:  [Video clip]

CNN's Cuomo Accuses Mark McCloskey of Being the 'Face of White Resistance' to Black Lives Matter.  Tuesday [6/30/2020], on his CNN program, host Chris Cuomo challenged St. Louis homeowner Mark McCloskey on the merits of his use of self-defense of life and property by brandishing a firearm in front of his home as a mob of protesters threatened him and his wife.  According to Cuomo, by doing so, McCloskey and his wife had become the "face of white resistance" to the Black Lives Matter protest movement.

Media Are Playing Games Yet Again With Anonymous Russia Leaks.  Much of the case for the Iraq War was based on the Bush administration's claim that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction.  When the United States declared an end to the war late in 2011, more than 4,400 American military members had been killed and nearly 32,000 wounded.  No weapons of mass destruction had been found.  It's one of the most significant and catastrophic intelligence errors in U.S. history.  A bipartisan commission found that U.S. intelligence "seriously misjudged" Iraq's weapons program because of their "heavy reliance on a human source — codenamed 'Curveball' — whose information later proved to be unreliable."  The commission wrote, "Even more misleading was the river of intelligence that flowed from the CIA to top policymakers over long periods of time — in the President's Daily Brief (PDB)" and other reports that were "more alarmist" and "less nuanced."

The Media Is Lying About The 'Second Wave'.  For months, the Washington Post and the rest of the mainstream media kept a morbid Covid-19 "death count" on their front pages and at the top of their news broadcasts.  The coronavirus outbreak was all about the number of dead.  The narrative was intended to boost governors like Cuomo in New York and Whitmer in Michigan, who turned their states authoritarian under the false notion that destroying people's jobs, freedom, and lives would somehow keep a virus from doing what viruses always do:  spread through a population until eventually losing strength and dying out.  The "death count" was always the headline.  But then all of a sudden early in June the mainstream media did a George Orwell and lectured us that it is all about "cases" and has always been all about "cases."  Death, and especially infection fatality rate, were irrelevant.  Why?  Because from the peak in April, deaths had decreased by 90 percent and were continuing to crash.  That was not terrifying enough so the media pretended this good news did not exist.

Surprise:  Latest Deep State Leak Pushed by Leftwing Media Is Another Huge Lie.  There was never anything about Russians paying the Taliban bounties on American soldiers to report.  This was low-level gossip (at best) that was never corroborated even in a small way.

Self-righteous vandals.  Violent left-wing activists have taken to styling themselves as antifa, short for 'anti-fascists', though their street-fighting tactics resemble nothing so much as the Brownshirt thuggery practiced by fascists themselves.  This did not stop NPR national political correspondent Mara Liasson from likening these hooligans to the heroes of World War Two.  On the anniversary of D-Day, June 6, while America's cities still smoldered after days of riots and looting, Liasson took to Twitter to call the Normandy invasion the 'biggest antifa rally in history'. Dumb jokes are nothing new on Twitter.  For many liberals today, however, it's no laughing matter.  They really do think that America is fascist, at least whenever a Republican is in the White House, and so petty vandalism is actually a heroic act of resistance.  Knock the head off a statue of Columbus, smash the glass of every storefront on the street, and you're defeating Adolf Hitler all over again.  Such is the state of historical literacy and what passes for the moral imagination among many with comfortable perches in the national media.  You would think that if they had a problem with the establishment, they should throw the first rock at a mirror.  Spare the innocent shopkeepers who pay the price for antifa antics.  Plenty of them are black or immigrants themselves, if that's what matters to the worthies of NPR.

Massive Trump Crowds Inside and Outside Tulsa BOK Center — 6.7 Million Online Viewers!  The liberal mainstream media can't get their talking points straight.  They want to condemn President Trump for holding such a large rally during the coronavirus pandemic.  They also want to lie to Americans that it was a failure and no one showed up.  It must be very difficult being the fake news media these days.

The Media Are Lying To You About Everything, Including The Riots.  In recent days we've heard a steady drumbeat of lies, distortions, and disingenuousness from the mainstream media about almost every aspect of the unrest now gripping American cities.  The deceit is almost too pervasive and amorphous to describe, but I'm going to try anyway.  Over the weekend we were told, for example, that the looting and violence was being instigated not by left-wing anarchists and antifa groups but by the media's favorite villains:  white supremacists.  CNN, whose Atlanta offices were vandalized Friday, went on and on — without a shred of evidence to back it up — about how white supremacists might be infiltrating the protests and stirring up trouble.  The New York Times, in a report that even quoted a senior police official in New York City saying outside anarchist groups were coordinating mayhem before the protests began, nevertheless veered into a long aside about how far-right "accelerationists" were hoping the unrest would bring about a long-sought second civil war.  By Monday [6/15/2020], no one was talking about the white supremacist agitators anymore.  The media had moved on to better, more plausible lies.

10 Fake News Moments.  It is far worse than most realize.  [Video clip]

BLM protesters violently attack police cruisers in broad daylight in cities around the US.  When it comes to Black Lives Matter protests, the liberal media continues to sell the American people on the lofty ideas of racial equality while vilifying police officers on the front lines of the cultural rot seen in urban America.  Officers put their lives on the line to ensure law and order every time they put on the uniform, but that risk has gone up exponentially after the violent BLM riots over the past two weeks.  Cops have been attacked, shot and stabbed, and the attacks continue to this day — even as the media pushes a "peaceful protesters" narrative.

Frank Luntz tweet.  Tonight [6/11/2020], @ChrisCuomo criticized Trump's economy while using data that stops in 2016.  This is complete incompetence.  Journalistically and editorially.

Red and blue reversed
History Channel Tags Slave-Holding Confederates as Red States.  The History Channel in late May produced a mostly laudable documentary series on Ulysses S. Grant, rightly hailing the legacy of the victorious Union general and the president who fought for civil rights.  However, the series contained what's become a recurring problem in some historical reflections on the Civil War.  Throughout the three part series, the production repeatedly showed the slave-holding Confederates as red states and the Union north as blue states.  In reality, it's the reverse.  As anyone familiar with history knows, the Confederates were Democrats.  It was Abraham Lincoln's Republican Party that fought the war to preserve the union and ultimately to end slavery.  As Marine and retired U.S. Army War College professor Daniel Douds astutely explained Grant's strategy to defeat the Confederates, the on-screen graphic showcased the (incorrect) blue state/red state dynamic.


Fox News runs digitally altered images in coverage of Seattle's protests, Capitol Hill Autonomous ZoneThis story has been updated to include an apology Fox News posted on its website on Saturday [6/13/2020].  Fox News published digitally altered and misleading photos on stories about Seattle's Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone (CHAZ) in what photojournalism experts called a clear violation of ethical standards for news organizations.  As part of a package of stories Friday about the zone, where demonstrators have taken over several city blocks on Capitol Hill after Seattle police abandoned the East Precinct, Fox's website for much of the day featured a photo of a man standing with a military-style rifle in front of what appeared to be a smashed retail storefront.  The image was actually a mashup of photos from different days, taken by different photographers — it was done by splicing a Getty Images photo of an armed man, who had been at the protest zone June 10, with other images from May 30 of smashed windows in downtown Seattle.

The Media Urge to Explain away 'Defund the Police'.  The hot protest slogan and hashtag of the moment is "Defund the Police."  At times, it's also framed as a call to abolish or disband the police.  Ordinary speakers of the English language would naturally assume, listening to people chant "defund the police" in the streets, carry "defund the police" signs, and literally paint "defund the police" on the streets of D.C., that such people mean "defund the police."  But not our media!  There's been an immediate rush to write pieces explaining that, of course, "defund the police" does not actually mean "defund the police."

It's Your Fault They Turn to Violence!  According to the media narrative, whatever unpleasant behavior a person or group is engaging in — from criminal and gang activity to sheer terrorism — if you're white and the other party is not, that proves that the behavior is entirely your fault.  Your insufferable racism and xenophobia have pushed these people over the edge; their criminal behavior is a reflection of their many grievances against you.  This would certainly require ameliorating if it were true.  It's not. [...] A black man was tragically killed by a police officer.  Although he has been arrested and charged with murder, that's not enough.  If you're white, the current turmoil — the looting, burning, and killing — is, once again, ultimately your fault:  "grievances" coming to roost.

A.G. Barr:  "They're Not Peaceful Protesters, That's A Big Lie Promoted By The Media".  The attorney general says what we are thinking — when the media insists that the protesters are peaceful, it is a lie.  Many of them have been violent, enough to wreak havoc and destruction on cities across the country.  Tell the small business owners without insurance who had their storefront windows broken and their merchandise looted that it was just peaceful protesters upset about the death of George Floyd.  What about all the injuries and hospitalizations and even some deaths that have been the result of protests?

Michael Baden Did Not Perform Autopsy But You Are Being Told He Did.  If Joe Biden was a forensic pathologist his name would be Dr. Michael Baden.  The 85 year old freelance medical examiner has quite a past and a present.  In recent days, he has fanned the flames of "cover-up" by reporting that Mr. George Floyd was indeed choked to death despite the county medical examiner's finding that Floyd did not die from asphyxiation and he did not die from strangulation.  In fact, the autopsy showed that Floyd had no trauma on his body whatsoever.  His ingestion of fentanyl and methamphetamine combined with a pre-existing heart and hypertension history contributed to his death.  And murder charges were brought against Officer Derek Chauvin because the medical examiner added that the "restraint" also contributed to the death of Floyd.  But Baden made the rounds on national television yesterday [6/2/2020] after he was hired by the family to do a second autopsy.

After Falsely Claiming Tear Gas Use, Media Now Trying To Pretend Tear Gas And Pepper Spray Are Identical.  After the media reported that Park Police deployed tear gas, an aerosolized version of the synthetic compound 2-chlorobenzalmalononitrile also referred to as "CS gas," to disperse protesters in front of the White House, Park Police explicitly denied the charge: [...] So it was smoke canisters, not tear gas.  And pepper balls explained the irritating effect that some protesters reported.  This directly contradicted thousands of tweets, print articles, and broadcast stories.  President Donald Trump lambasted the media, highlighting a story this writer published yesterday.  That article has some of the headlines from prominent media that falsely claimed "tear gas" was used against "peaceful" protesters.

Media Falsely Claimed Violent Riots Were Peaceful And That Tear Gas Was Used Against Rioters.  Following days of violent riots and looting in cities across the country, Washington, D.C., announced a 7 p.m. curfew on Monday night.  About the same time, President Donald Trump addressed the nation from the Rose Garden.  Afterward, he walked through Lafayette Park to St. John's Episcopal Church, which rioters had set on fire the night before.  Standing before the church sign, which reads "All are welcome," President Trump, who previously said he'd be paying his respects to a very special place, held up a Bible.  The speech announcing the country would return to rule of law and protection of civil liberties, the walk through a park that the night before had been given over to rioters, and the visit to the vandalized historic church where every president has worshiped since James Madison, were reassuring to many in the country.  For the media, however, these actions were further proof that Orange Man Bad is literally the worst, restoring rule of law is criminal, and standing in front of a church holding a Bible is an assault on the American conscience.

The Media Are Lying To You About Everything, Including The Riots.  It seems no great event or upheaval in our national life can pass now without the media lying to our faces about it.  They lied about the Trump campaign colluding with Russia in 2016.  They lied about the Mueller probe and Brett Kavanaugh and former national security adviser Mike Flynn.  They lied about Trump's phone call with the Ukrainian president and the impeachment farce that ensued.  They lied about the coronavirus and the lockdowns and the White House response.  And now they're lying about the riots. [...] Over the weekend we were told, for example, that the looting and violence was being instigated not by left-wing anarchists and antifa groups but by the media's favorite villains: white supremacists.  CNN, whose Atlanta offices were vandalized Friday, went on and on — without a shred of evidence to back it up — about how white supremacists might be infiltrating the protests and stirring up trouble.

Teen Vogue:  Antifa 'Aspires Toward Creating a Better World'.  Leftist outlet Teen Vogue told its readers that the terrorist organization Antifa "aspires to create a better world" in the wake of riots that have broken out across the country, which have involved looting, vandalism, businesses being destroyed, beatings, and death.  "'Antifa grows out of a larger revolutionary politics that aspires toward creating a better world, but the primary motivation is to stop racists from organizing,'" tweeted Teen Vogue on Monday [6/1/2020].

Logic, Rhetoric, and Race.  Most of the blame for this situation belongs to the media, especially cable-news networks, which provide the audience for performative protests that are as ritualistic as kabuki theater.  The opening act is an "incident" involving the death of a black man at the hands of the police.  This is followed by demands for justice, with activists denouncing the incident as proof of systemic racial oppression.  A hashtag campaign emerges on social media platforms, and Hollywood celebrities lend their voices to the outcry.  Cable networks convene panel discussions, and the story is updated hourly in the days leading up to the protest rally.  The participants in this demonstration are "mostly peaceful," we are told, while we watch the protest turn into a devastating riot in front of our eyes.  We have seen this drama performed many times over the years, especially during the heyday of the #BlackLivesMatter movement that emerged in Ferguson, Missouri, in August 2014, and continued through the Charlotte, North Carolina, riot of September 2016.

Who Had 'Race Riots' on Their Pandemic Bingo Cards?  [Scroll down]  I've been saying for a while that we were probably going to find out within the next six months that all of the social-distance and lockdown stuff was [nonsense], but that all got taken care of this past weekend.  Of course, the execrable Enemy of the People media types have been lying to our faces again, running with a narrative of "cops bad and mostly peaceful protesters" even with so much evidence to the contrary.  There certainly are a lot burning buildings for "mostly peaceful" protests.  The most priceless moment came Friday night [5/29/2020] when MSNBC's Ali Velshi was reassuring everyone that the protests were mostly peaceful while standing in front of a burning building:

Blaming White Supremacists For The Riots Is Nonsensical Gaslighting.  On Saturday morning [5/30/2020] Minnesota officials came out with an audacious and absurd explanation for the looting and arson that struck Minneapolis this week.  Apparently it was white supremacists from out of state who pretended to be actual protestors in an attempt to discredit the protest.  The evidence?  A vague claim and a lie.  It turns out that most of those arrested were actually Minnesota residents.  The hypocritical mental gymnastics from the liberal media in the past 72 hours were amazing enough to earn a perfect 10 from the stingiest East German judge.  First, we watched tens of thousands of people hold mass gatherings across the country, which just last week we were told would kill everyone, and the media suddenly didn't care.  It's like the Chinese virus just went away by magic.

Media Completely Misrepresents Trump Tweets About Minneapolis Rioting.  In their flailing efforts to blame President Donald Trump for the actions of a lone police officer in Minneapolis, the mainstream media is once again twisting the president's words to make it appear as if he made a racist statement, when in fact, the opposite is true.  Late Thursday night [5/28/2020], the president tweeted a message to those who would burn buildings and loot defenseless stores in the wake of the tragic death of George Floyd in Minneapolis.  The tweet was obviously meant as a warning to people who would destroy a major American city, but the anti-Trump mainstream media and Twitter itself saw it as another opportunity to portray the president as a racist, despite all evidence to the contrary.

The Media's Top Lies and Spins About COVID-19.  In such uncertain times, Americans can only hope that the media would follow suit and put aside partisan politics in the face of a global pandemic.  Sadly, some journalists and fake news outlets can't help themselves.  The media distorts and misleads, takes statements out of context, treats assumptions as facts, and in general, seems to want to sow as much rancor and fear as possible.  This is irresponsible journalism in a time when the nation needs just the opposite.

Just How Exaggerated Is The COVID-19 Death Count?  As the "official" tally of COVID-19 deaths tops 100,000 in the U.S., we keep hearing how that number is likely a low-ball estimate.  But there's far more evidence that the death count has been knowingly exaggerated — possibly by a very wide margin.  A recent Seattle Times article pretty much lays out the charade going on.  The headline reads:  "Washington state's actual coronavirus death toll may be higher than current tallies, health officials say."  But the story itself leads one to the exact opposite conclusion. [...] The story goes on to say that the state's dashboard "reflects anyone who died, that tested positive for COVID, irrespective of cause of death."  (Emphasis added.)  Basically, the state has been matching up the names of those who died this year with a database containing names of people who tested positive for COVID-19.

CNN, MSNBC are peddling panic, moral judgment, not science and data, in coronavirus coverage.  We hope you had a happy Memorial Day weekend.  It's possible you have spent, along with millions of others, months trapped indoors per government order because of the coronavirus.  So, getting outside makes all the difference — grilling a hamburger in the fresh air, hitting the park, walking on the beach for a couple of hours.  It's essential.  All of us needed it.  Nature is medicine.  Happy, balanced people understand that intuitively.  You can't just sit on a couch all day barking at other people on social media.  Your soul will rot if you do that.  And unfortunately, it's too late for a lot of people at CNN, and they haven't even been trapped inside for months.  For reasons that no one in authority has ever really explained, cable news yappers have been classified as essential workers from the very first day of lockdown.

Of Course COVID-19 Deaths Aren't a 'Trump Death Toll'.  Does anyone seriously think that if Donald Trump were not president, the coronavirus pandemic would have never hit America?  The super PAC Democratic Coalition — which supports presumptive Democratic nominee Joe Biden — apparently does, because it has launched a series of ads describing deaths from the coronavirus as the "Trump Death Toll."

Trump is right about the huge potential for ballot fraud in Michigan's election.  To hear the mainstream media tell it, President Trump is somehow paranoid at Michigan's latest gambit to mail absentee voting applications to all registered voters in the state.  Here's the selectively distorted reporting from the Detroit News: [...] They ran it with a photograph of Trump with a photoshopped color manipulation that exaggerated the color of his skin as well as his blue tie to colors not consistent with the lighting in the room. [...]

Don't Buy the Misleading Figures.  Here's the Real Story About How the U.S. Matches Up on Coronavirus Deaths.  The sheer ease with which the American left has politicized the deaths of thousands of Americans has shocked even me.  The United States is approaching 100,000 deaths and the left seems determined to make sure the public blames President Donald Trump for those deaths.  As PJM's Tyler O'Neil noted, the Democratic Coalition is trying to make "Trump Death Toll" a thing.  While Tyler effectively demonstrated the absurdity of blaming these deaths on Trump, I'm going to show that despite the headlines that suggest things in the United States are the worst in the world, that is emphatically not the case.

The Doctrine of Media Untruth.  As a general rule, when the New York Times, the Washington Post, National Public Radio, Public Broadcasting Service, NBC, CBS, ABC, MSNBC, and CNN begin to parrot a narrative, the truth often is found in simply believing just the opposite.  Put another way, the media's "truth" is a good guide to what is abjectly false.  Perhaps we can call the lesson of this valuable service, the media's inadvertent ability to convey truth by disguising it with transparent bias and falsehood, the "Doctrine of Media Untruth."

Long-lens dishonesty again:
That picture of Ocean City doesn't show what the scolds say it shows.  One particular picture from Ocean City, Maryland, this weekend seems to show a totally packed boardwalk.  This has led to all sorts of scolding.  Here's a Reuters congressional reporter cursing the walkers for lacking the self-control to stay inside and on Twitter, like responsible folks should do. [Tweet ...] See that sign in the distance that says, "PLAYLAND"?  That is south of Worcester Street.  It's 1,100 feet down the boardwalk from the body piercing sign.  Tiger Woods's average drive is 285 yards.  If he teed off from where that photographer is standing, Woods would be 80 yards short of Playland.

GQ Political Reporter Misidentifies George Wallace As Republican To Smear GOP. Wallace Was A Democrat.  Laura Bassett, who also writes as freelance political reporter, wrote a Wednesday op-ed titled "The Anti-Abortion Movement Was Always Built on Lies," attempting to chronicle evangelical efforts in building up the pro-life movement.  The crux of Bassett's piece rests on the foundation that the pro-life movement was "bought and paid for the Christian right," to morph the Republican Party into the pro-life party.  While explaining the party's historical support for legal abortion, Bassett used the example of Wallace as a Republican governor whose promotion of abortion was motivated by Republicans' intent to stop "breeding children as a cash crop," to collect more in government handouts.  Only one problem:  Wallace was one of the biggest 20th century stars of the Democratic Party, and by no means a Republican.

If you want to see a microcosm of our vile American media, this is it.  I was looking for articles showing that those who predicted deadly failure due to Governor Brian Kemp's decision to open Georgia were wrong.  I found such an article at Business Insider, a widely read online news outlet.  Diving into the article, though, revealed that it wasn't reporting the news at all.  Instead, it provided a perfect example of how the media shape and distort the news in service to a Democrat narrative.  When Governor Kemp announced three weeks ago that he would start opening up Georgia, the media had a field day.  After all, this was the governor who "stole" the election from Stacey Abrams, a woman distinguished only by being the worst loser in American gubernatorial history. (Hillary Clinton still holds the record for being the worst loser ever.) [...] If Michelle Mark, the reporter wanted to be factual, her article would have consisted of one sentence:  "Georgia's Department of Public Health has published data showing what appears to be a significant decline in new cases and deaths."  Instead, the entire, very long article is a series of hypotheticals about how maybe, possibly, even probably, people will still get sick in Georgia.

"Mask Police Reporter," Kaitlin Collins Rips Off Mask Immediately After She Thinks Cameras Are Off, Rushes to Speak Maskless to Other Reporters.  Another black eye for the Karenwaffe.  This wouldn't be a story except Karen Collins here is one of the Firefighters bravely mask-shaming her targets.  Governor/Murderer Andrew Cuomo gets no mask-shaming for not wearing a mask at press conferences, but of course Trump does.  Karen Collins wears a mask at press conferences.  Until the moment the camera is off her.  Then it comes off faster than a t-shirt at Mardi Gras.

WaPo's new mantra is Just Don't Report.  As the walls close in on Obama's use of the FBI to spy on political opponents, the Washington Post has a simple solution for a press that aided and abetted him:  If something looks bad "just don't report that it does."  The full quote by columnist Greg Sargent is, "There is a legitimately difficult editorial challenge in figuring out how to scrutinize a mostly conventional politician who is running against a bottomlessly corrupt and dishonest opponent like Trump, as Brian Beutler has noted, without placing a similarly sized question mark over both of them.  "There's just no doubt that this happened in 2016, as has been widely documented.  "This is plainly on its way to happening again.  But it doesn't have to.  One way to avoid this:  If something doesn't actually 'boost' or 'lend fodder' to a big claim that Trump is making, just don't report that it does.  "It's simple, but it's a start."  Just don't report.

When Did the Media Stop Running Corrections?  Last week, Vanity Fair had nice little scoop, or so it thought.  Gabriel Sherman, whose title is special correspondent, authored an article premised on a major bit of news — investors aligned with Donald Trump Jr. had purchased a stake in the pro-Trump, conservative news outlet One America News Network (OANN).  This was news to Charles P. Herring, president of OANN's parent company, who fired off a letter to Vanity Fair owner Conde Nast demanding a retraction and an apology.  "The facts are undisputable and in direct conflict with your false and defamatory statements," he wrote.  "Herring Networks, Inc. has not sold ANY stake in One America News Network or its company to anyone or any entity, period."  Vanity Fair quickly recast Sherman's story without acknowledging its error:  "This post has been updated to include a denial from Blackstone, and to reflect comments received after publication by Charles P. Herring, president of Herring Networks, OANN's parent company."  In sum, Sherman based his piece on a premise that was wrong, and Vanity Fair merely acted as if all the story needed was a minor update.

How the 1619 Project Destroys the True Moral Meaning of America.  Honest patriots of our great republic are upset at the recent bestowal of the 2020 Pulitzer Prize for Commentary on Nikole Hannah-Jones and her 1619 Project.  As most readers might already know, the 1619 project was inaugurated with a special issue in the The New York Times Magazine in August of 2019.  Its goal was and remains one of challenging us all to reframe U.S history by marking the year when the first enslaved Africans arrived in Virginia as our nation's foundational date.  The project promulgates the idea that everything that has made America exceptional literally grew out of slavery.  It, therefore, establishes 1619 and not 1776 as our nation's true founding date.  The egregious historical inaccuracies of the project and Hannah-Jones' claims have been well documented.  The most egregious among them which the Times has had to minimally correct, included claiming that the American Revolution was literally fought to preserve the institution of slavery, and that Abraham Lincoln opposed the equality of blacks.

Where is Christine Blasey Ford and why hasn't she said anything about Tara Reade?  [Scroll down]  Christine Blasey Ford wasn't whisked away from earth in 2018. She's still out there somewhere reading the news.  She knows about Tara Reade and, so far, she hasn't offered a word of public support about her allegation.  That's true even though Tara Reade made a point of saying she believed Christine Blasey Ford in her interview with Megyn Kelly.  Isn't it pretty remarkable that Ford has remained silent?  Has anyone in the media even tried to ask Blasey Ford if she believes Reade?  Did reporters at every news outlet suddenly lose her number after the confirmation?  Given the media comparisons between the two women over the past several weeks, it really does seem like an obvious avenue to pursue.  So why hasn't the media pursued it?

Gowdy ready to expose reporters who 'aided and abetted' Adam Schiff during Russia investigation.  Former federal prosecutor Trey Gowdy says voting out Democratic California Rep. Adam Schiff is not enough punishment for the damage he has done to President Trump and the intelligence community.  During a Friday night [5/8/2020] appearance on Hannity, Gowdy told the Fox News host he also wants reporters who advanced the fake Russian collusion story to be named publicly and that he's willing to do it.  "The media, not only did they not provide scrutiny over Adam Schiff, they aided and abetted him," Gowdy said. "Politico, the Hill, Washington Post, New York Times, I'll come on and even give you the reporters' names sometimes.  The reporters who sat there and helped Adam Schiff perpetrate this fraud, next time I'm with you I'll give you the names of the reporters."

Video Allegedly Shows That Once The Cameras Are Off Reporters Remove Their Masks And Don't Follow Social Distancing Rules.  Americans are skeptical of the news media.  A recent Gallup Poll shows that 55% of Americans disapprove of the way the media have handled the coronavirus coverage — that's a higher disapproval rating than Congress, which is saying a lot.  And the public's response to the coronavirus pandemic reveals its distrust.  And we can now tell why Americans don't trust the mainstream media.

The Eight Worst 'Fake News' Stories of the Trump Years.  Journalists bristle when President Trump criticizes them as "fake news," and they complain that such criticism erodes the public's faith in the news media as an independent watchdog on the powerful.  But Trump's critiques wouldn't have nearly as much impact if news organizations actually acted like careful, professional, independent purveyors of fact.  Instead, they too often behave as sloppy partisans, carelessly jumping on one false story after another if they think it will prove their larger narrative that the President is unfit for office.  Sometimes, the "fake news" is about a small detail that suggests a broader pattern: the Time magazine pool reporter who wrongly claimed on Twitter that Trump had removed a bust of Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr., from the Oval Office, perhaps hinting at a racial animus.  In fact, the bust was right there, obscured from view by a Secret Service agent and a door.

Controversial Photo of 'Crowds' on CA Beach Was Shot with a Telephoto Lens.  A photo showing crowds packing a beach in California during the state's COVID-19 lockdown sparked controversy this past week and led to the area's beaches getting shut down.  Now that photo itself is at the center of a heated debate:  many are saying that it's misleading because it was shot with a telephoto lens.

C-SPAN posting inaccurate transcripts of Trump briefings.  C-SPAN is publishing inaccurate transcripts of President Donald Trump's remarks during the vitally important national coronavirus task force daily briefings.  Yes, really.  So Trump is being falsely attacked for what Trump never said (again).  The worst of it, lately, is Trump asking questions to scientists.  Those questions have been transformed into statements that Trump never made.  But as I endeavored to clear up the fog, I was shocked to discover that C-SPAN's textual transcript are the source of the confusion.  The quotes that Trump haters are throwing around happen to be accurate reports of the inaccurate C-SPAN transcript.

The Hypocrisy on Tara Reade Is a National Disgrace.  We do not know whether the accusations that Tara Reade has leveled against Joe Biden are true or false.  That is a question of evidence and of inquiry that might be answered as time rolls on.  We do know, by contrast, that the double standard that has been exhibited by Biden's campaign and by the political press in tandem is a national disgrace.  Both culturally and legally, due process must be habitually applied to nobody or to everyone.  If, upon the most frivolous and protean of pretexts, it is routinely accorded to one faction while being denied to another, it is effectively lost.

Jake Tapper and Chuck Todd Deliberately Lie to Viewers While Questioning Dr. Deborah Birx.  David Mamet had a famous saying that is often cited.  Essentially he said:  'in order for left-wing partisans and ideologues to continue advancing their agenda, they must pretend not to know things.'  CTH calls this "The Mamet Principle."  No where is that quote more clearly showcased than with two media interviews of Dr. Deborah Birx today [4/27/2020].  CNN's Jake Tapper and NBC's Chuck Todd both pretend not to know the guidelines and gateways for a phase-one reopening of the U.S. economy.  Both pundits fabricate information purposefully and with specific intent.

Reporter Compared Coronavirus Deaths To Vietnam To Rip Trump.  But During Vietnam, Another Virus Killed More Americans Than The War.  On Monday, a reporter from New York Magazine asked President Trump whether he deserved to be reelected, since more Americans had died from the coronavirus than died in the war in Vietnam.  She may have been unaware that at the height of the Vietnam war, there was something that killed more Americans than the war did, and it was a similar virus — and no one questioned whether a president should be elected or not because of the virus, known as the Hong Kong Flu.  In 1968-69, the Hong Kong flu ravaged the world; it wound up killing more than one million people worldwide, over 100,000 of them in the United States.  No lockdowns were imposed and people still went to work, albeit lessening bus travel and implementing social distancing and more washing of their hands.

Disinfecting the Left-Wing Media.  As well as President Trump has done in those daily press briefings discussing the federal government's fight against the Wuhan ChiCom virus, it might be time to put those to bed.  The reason?  He's beaten the Democrat activists in the White House press corps to a pulp, he's destroyed their credibility, and he's captured as much of the confidence of the American people as he can in those press conferences.  And at this point the Dem activists are simply going to report what they want to report, the facts and reality [notwithstanding].  Trump has noticed that, skipping the briefing on Saturday and expressing frustration with the media's refusal to offer anything like responsible journalism on the virus.

Virus Strikes Media Dumb.  There's a lot of important news this week which is getting insufficient coverage. [...] Instead, we are back to story number one:  How to refashion news on the Wuhan virus to attack the President.  As been the case from the beginning, the press is using every foul means to demean him and make this the Trump Virus, ignoring his measured approach and successes.  This week they glommed onto his remarks in a presser that revealed the contagion curve is flattening and diminishing to suggest that Trump had called for something as possible remediation — bleach injection — that he had not.  In some cases, they flat-out lied about what he said.  In others they edited the presser video to achieve the same distortion.  Regular readers of this site know a great deal about press information manipulation and lies.  I write this in the hope that you will share it with those others who still don't get it.

How the N.Y. Times Swung at Fox News, and Missed.  Not content to accuse Donald Trump of killing Americans with his incompetence during the coronavirus pandemic, Democrats and their allies in the media have turned their fire on the president's supporters as well.  Those with "blood on their hands," to use the smear du jour, range from Republican governors reluctant to issue quarantine orders to Michigan autoworkers protesting being locked out their jobs.

Fake News:  Trump Didn't Tell People to Inject Bleach or Lysol Into Their Veins to Fight Coronavirus.  On Thursday, liberals thought they finally had the smoking gun, the excuse to oust President Donald Trump as mentally unfit for office.  Some called him "President bleach," claiming he had suggested people should inject bleach or Lysol into their veins to fight the coronavirus. [...] Then the commentary.  "Trump unquestionably is unfit to serve as president.  He endangers every American.  Most directly, he endangers his supporters, many of whom either believe the virus is a hoax (prompting them to engage in dangerous behavior) or now that injecting/ingesting disinfectants is in order," tweeted MSNBC legal analyst Glenn Kirschner. [...] Trump wasn't telling people to drink or inject bleach — he was asking whether or not it would be possible to clean inside the body with a similar disinfectant.  He also insisted, "you're going to have to use medical doctors with" any such practice.  In other words, "don't try this at home, kids."

Remember the government shutdowns?  Funny how we don't see those same sob stories about lost paychecks now.  Whenever the threat of a government shutdown looms, Democrats and their media allies give us daily doses of how devastating such a thing will be on 'non-essential' government workers.  Then they go into overdrive when a shutdown actually occurs:  Wall-to-wall sob stories giving examples of government workers supposedly harmed even though, everyone knows, those employees will soon be paid.  They essentially have a paid vacation.  Now, after weeks of the intentional destruction of the private sector with tens of millions of jobs lost, with businesses and families being devasted and having no idea how they will feed their families and themselves, there are few of those same sob stories, despite real hardship, and here is what we get instead:  If a Republican governor wants to open a state's businesses, we get attack pieces saying he wants people to die.

Journalists are a gullible bunch on COVID-19.  We are told that a large number of people have the virus of whom we don't know, including people without symptoms, and that a large number of people who never were diagnosed with the disease and never had symptoms now might be immune to the disease.  We are told that in order to reopen the economy safely, we need to test everyone to see if he has it, even people without symptoms, and also to test people to see if they are immune so the government can release those to work.  Then we are told that if we find someone who currently has the disease, we need to find everyone he has been within six feet of for fifteen minutes in the past two weeks and then put all of those people under house arrest for two weeks.  Then we are told that until we get a vaccine, which may be a year or never, we must practice social distancing, wear masks, and never gather in groups of more than ten, or else huge numbers of people will die.  Now, this sounds to me as though they would rather see the economy destroyed and the U.S. collapse than allow people the freedom to work, save their businesses, and feed their families.

The Cult That Rewrites History:  Part 1.  On Monday April 13th, at the daily presidential briefing held by the President of the United States, Donald J. Trump, took a most interesting turn.  During the first half hour of that briefing, Trump and his CCP Virus emergency response team took more than a month and a half of carefully constructed lies that Democrats and the DNC Media Complex have been using to relentlessly attack him, turned the tables, and utterly destroyed them.  The President did this by simply playing a video for the reporters present, and the entire country watching on television.  What this brief video clip did, is establish the correct timeline showing who was doing and saying what and when they were doing and saying those things.  Trump's masterful use of that video during the daily national emergency briefing absolutely destroyed the Democrats and Fake News Media's talking point that he ignored/didn't do anything in the early days of the pandemic.

1984 Comes to Life:  The Cult That Rewrites History — Part Two.  It's probable that every single reporter that reacted emotionally to the video President Trump played at the briefing came out of that Cultural Marxist academic system.  They have likely spent decades of their lives training their minds to enthusiastically love whatever Big Brother is giving to them to say today, and memory-holing the past.  That's why you notice them reacting so emotionally to the video presentation.  They can't hide it, and they are certainly not faking it.  It hit them right where they live.  Right in the center of their own self-image.  He took their power away from them.  Let me tell you something:  you wind these people on a very deep and personal level when you will not let them have their precious memory hole.  You injure them when you do not let them rewrite the history they are so desperate to rewrite.  And especially so, when it is imperative for their politics that the public either not know, or quickly forget something.  You are taking away their power and they know this.

Don't Get Fooled by Fake Photos of Coronavirus Lockdown Protests.  As a series of demonstrations against COVID-19 lockdown orders sweep the U.S., protesters have shown wildly varying degrees of responsibility and realism.  Some have been staying 6 feet from others or even protesting from within cars, while simply asking for some shutdown leeway for local businesses and entrepreneurs who are willing to take extra steps to keep pandemic-times customers safe.  Alas, others have been crowding up against each other in large numbers — without masks or any other precautions — while suggesting that the entire coronavirus outbreak might be a hoax.  Some folks online have started spreading rumors that protesters are paid "crisis actors" — alleging their signs too well-made or similar and that their websites have fishy origins. [...] On the flip side, people's revulsion at the more reckless or bratty elements of these protests is setting up social media for a round of fake protest news.

Now It's Obvious:  The Political Class and the Media Are Spinning Tales.  At the outset of the coronavirus lockdowns my colleague Pete Earle penned a prescient article about the propensity of political actors to rewrite the history of the unfolding crisis in real time. [...] Sadly but not unexpectedly, this real-time revisionism has only accelerated in the last month.  We've now reached a point where reporters, public officeholders, and federal bureaucrats are now revising their own words and actions from only a few weeks prior — all while hoping that nobody will notice.  The latest example involves the unfolding controversy over President Donald Trump's assertion of authority to set a national timeline for the repeal of the ongoing economic lockdown, presumably superseding state governors and local officials who refuse. [...] While the press today fumes in outrage at Trump's newly claimed power, only 10 days ago many of these same news outlets were clamoring for the very same national lockdown that Trump demurred.  Just two weeks ago reporters peppered Trump with questions about his failure to impose a national shelter in place order.

Why Has the Voice of America Become a Voice of Confusion?  President Trump startled Washington last week by launching an attack on Voice of America, which for 80 years has been charged with presenting and explaining American values and policy abroad.  Trump called it a "disgrace" that the current VOA leadership was allowing its service to repeat Chinese talking points on the COVID-19 virus.  A White House statement also took issue with the news agency that called Chinese efforts in Wuhan to contain the virus a "model" for other nations.  The statement also noted that VOA relied on unverified (and subsequently proven false) Chinese-government statistics in some reporting.

Our Garbage Media.  The mendacity and mediocrity of our major news media have seldom been on display more clearly than during the COVID-19 crisis.  While the media pretend to be "objective" and are now clearly on the side of the Democrats' narrative that Trump was negligent and slow in responding to the virus, there is plenty of evidence of the media downplaying the threat of the virus and criticizing Trump's early moves, especially his China travel ban, which the media decried as "xenophobic."  And then there is the media's lack of interest in the Tara Reade allegation about Joe Biden, which is so blatant that even Alexandria Ocasio Cortez gets it.

A free nation cannot long survive if its press takes sides.  On March 16, the New York Times' Mara Gay posted a stunningly dishonest tweet about President Trump's conversation with state governors concerning medical equipment needed to treat coronavirus patients:  [Tweet]  Gay lied in saying Trump told governors they are on their own, thus misleading readers to think he refused to provide the governors with federal funds for critical medical equipment.  Below is what Trump actually said — the part in boldface is what Gay selectively quoted, everything else is what she maliciously omitted:  "We will be backing you, but try getting it yourselves.  Point of sales, much better, much more direct if you can get it yourself." [...] What Gay did was journalistic malpractice at its most evil, a fake news political hatchet job against a president she hates in hopes of torpedoing his re-election.  Mara Gay is no rookie reporter who made an innocent mistake.  She's a member of the New York Times Editorial Board.  Her dissembling brand of destroy-Trump journalism has been practiced non-stop for nearly four years by virtually the entire mainstream media.

Photo of same boy faked to claim "youngest UK coronavirus death".  His photo has been widely shared on social media claiming he is a 13-year old who died of coronavirus in Great Britain.  A post on Facebook claimed he was a "schoolboy... with no health conditions" who became "UK's youngest coronavirus victim."  The post went on to read:  "Ismail Mohamed Abdulwahab, from Brixton, sadly died without any family members close by due to the highly infectious nature of Covid-19."  But it isn't true.  The same photograph of the same boy has circulated in news stories about deaths as far back as 2017.

Trump Exposes Phony Journalists with Video Montage.  [Scroll down]  But he had to do that yesterday, folks.  And it was great because it was nothing but their words.  It was nothing but video clips of the media themselves lying and getting things wrong and purposely distorting things.  He just zapped 'em.  I mean, just exposed them to the world.  This is the kind of thing that needs to happen constantly.  The American people who aren't aware need to be made aware what the media is. [...] And while their job title category might be journalists, this is not what they are practicing.  What they are practicing is opposition.  Whatever Trump is for, they guaranteed to be against it.  Whatever Trump is against, they are guaranteed to be for it.  Why are they for or against anything?  They are media.  Their pretense is that they are objective and fair and all of that.  It isn't the case.

Brutal Trump-de-Force at the Coronavirus Hearing Leaves Media Screaming 'Pull the Plug!'  Donald Trump absolutely lit up his own Coronavirus Task Force press briefing with a more than six-minute, tour-de-force media takedown that had CNN and MSNBC sputtering and reaching for the plug.  Trump said hello and turned the media briefing over to the NIH's Dr. Anthony Fauci to clarify his words uttered on CNN on shutting down the country earlier to prevent more deaths.  Then, Trump took over and it was ON.  He listed the timeline of his response to the coronavirus and presented a video of incorrect statements by the press on COVID-19.

Facebook's Fact-Checkers Have Failed To Fact-Check HuffPo's Anti-Trump Coronavirus Disinformation.  It will come as no surprise to Breitbart News readers that Facebook's vaunted fact-checking system does not stop, or even appropriately label, fake, misleading claims from the left-wing media about President Donald Trump.  A story from Verizon-owned HuffPost claims that the president has a stake in a drug company that produces hydroxycholoroquine, the drug being promoted by himself and many in the administration as a potential treatment for the Chinese virus.  The article is currently on Facebook without any labels alerting users that the information is false or even just misleading.

New York's Mass Graves Are Complete Propaganda: The Video Is From Potter's Field Where 25 People Are Buried In A Week In Normal Times.  New York City officials have hired contract laborers to bury the dead in its potter's field on Hart Island.  Images have emerged of coffins being buried in a "mass grave" in New York City.  This has caused for TrumpBurialPits to be the number one topic that's trending on the internet.  However, Trump Burial Pits is complete propaganda.  These images shown are of Potter's Field where 24 people are buried a day in normal times.  Do you really think we're burying thousands in some ditch on an Island in New York?  People don't want there loved ones to have a proper burial?  The city has also shortened the amount of time it will hold unclaimed remains before they are buried in the city's public cemetery.  Under the new policy, the numbers of daily burials should increase even in normal times, the medical examiner's office will keep bodies in storage for just 14 days before they're buried in the city's potter's field on Hart Island.  Workers in hazmat outfits were seen stacking wooden coffins in deep trenches in Hart Island.

Racial warrior offended when the Surgeon General tells minorities that behavior affects virus risks.  PBS's Yamiche Alcindor has distinguished herself as one of the media figures most engaged in the "gotcha" game at COVID-19 press conferences, especially when she can work race into the issue.  On Friday, after the Surgeon General made a direct plea to minorities about behaviors that can protect them, she went on the attack.  U.S. Surgeon General Dr. Jerome Adams spent five minutes during Friday's press conference talking about the fact that COVID-19 is hitting minority communities especially hard.  His densely packed presentation began with his addressing minorities' predisposition to diseases that increase the risk from COVID-19, such as asthma, heart disease, and diabetes. [...] PBS's Yamiche Alcindor was among the assembled reporters.  Having heard the entire presentation, she didn't ask a question that would help anyone understand substantive issues.  Instead, she went for the "gotcha" questions: [...]

The AP begins revising history to attack Trump.  The media are not only rude and confrontational at press briefings, but they're also re-writing history about how and when information on the virus came to light.  Facts don't matter.  There is only one goal:  Get Trump.  Toward that end, manipulating timelines has become quite popular as evidenced most recently in this AP report: [...] China lied, caused a global pandemic, and created circumstances in country after country that would make it more difficult to control due to lack of medical supplies.  WHO lied.  And our own experts seem to have been blindsided.  Along the way, time was squandered by the CDC, not the president.

American media keep repeating China's coronavirus talking points.  It should not be this easy for Chinese Communist Party propaganda to make its way into major American newsrooms.  Since the outbreak of the coronavirus, which Chinese lies ensured would become a pandemic, American news media have promoted a number of Beijing-approved talking points, including the one that alleges it is racist to refer to the virus by its country and city of origin.  American news media have also accepted at face value a series of dubious claims pushed by Chinese Communist apparatchiks, including the absurd boast that China's new case numbers have remained essentially flat since late February.  "U.S. has more known cases of coronavirus than any other country," CNN reported on March 26, its declaration coming in unison with nearly every major news outlet in the United States. [...] That is, the U.S. is "No. 1" only if you believe the numbers reported by China, which you should not.  Pandemic trackers work with the data provided, and the data provided by Beijing is unbelievable.

The Corporate Media's Coronavirus Propaganda For China Is Finally Catching Up With Them.  Beijing has lied about the coronavirus from the start, while here in the West our corporate media has actively and enthusiastically spread its lies to households across the free world.  But now that news of China's lies is beginning to seep out, will it make a difference?  Will there even be corrections?  Don't count on it.  Even before reports on incinerators "working around the clock," massive orders for urns, government bribes to keep mourners quiet, and total government censorship, China's lies were obvious.  Even before China concealed the outbreak, blamed the U.S. military, and expelled foreign reporters, their lies were obvious.  Their lies were so obvious because China is an authoritarian regime that history plainly documents killing and starving millions while lying about it to this day.  The press should know this, and they do know this, yet still corporate news outlets unquestioningly repeat Beijing's line.

Dr. Birx Finally Goes Right at the U.S. Media and China for Lying.  This has been a long time coming.  I understand the notion that figures like Dr. Deborah Birx should remain apolitical, and they should, but it's not "political" to tell the truth about China lying and the U.S. media choosing to play useful idiots in response.  During yesterday's [3/31/2020] presser, Dr. Birx finally took the gloves off and said what we've all been thinking.  These ridiculous graphs relying on Chinese data that media members are sharing are garbage and dangerous.

Who's Funding the Coronavirus Political Trolls?  [Scroll down]  Pacronym's Facebook digital disinformation campaign targets Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, North Carolina and Arizona, the same five states targeted by McGowan's Courier plot to create fake local news sites.  Coronavirus cases have sharply risen in Michigan and Pennsylvania, but McGowan is sticking to her plan to help elect Joe Biden by spreading uncertainty during a time when people need reassurance.  Americans need to know that they can trust the health advisories coming from the White House.  It's not a time to sow doubt and division.  But Democrat political operatives have decided that it's their moment.

Media Peddle Bogus Wuhan Virus Stats To Bash America.  When Donald Trump tweeted this week that the United States had performed more coronavirus tests than any other country, the media were upset.  Trump being Trump, he'd also said the United States had done more tests in eight days than South Korea had done in eight weeks.  PolitiFact calculated the United States had done 17,582 fewer tests than South Korea during that time period.  LiveScience said the United States had done 43,790 fewer tests than South Korea during that time period.  Their own disparity notwithstanding, other media outlets pointed out merely that South Korea is a much smaller country than the United States.  That meant they had done more tests per capita than the United States had.

What the Media Isn't Telling You About the United States' Coronavirus Case Numbers.  On Thursday [3/26/2020], the New York Times made a big fuss over the fact that more than 81,321 Americans have been infected with the coronavirus, which is "more cases than China, Italy or any other country has seen."  According to their report, the United States, following "a series of missteps," is now "the epicenter of the pandemic."  But, is it really?  China's confirmed cases topped out at around 80,000, but, as PJM's Victoria Taft noted, China reportedly stopped conducting tests in order to show the world they've contained the spread of the virus.  So, comparing any country to China at this point is useless.

The New York Times Tries to Spread Panic About Ventilators, Gets Fact-Checked.  The New York Times has been one of the worst news outlets during the Wuhan virus pandemic.  They've consistently taken partisan positions and purposely mislead the public.  For example, after Nancy Pelosi tried to blowup the latest relief package, the Times decided to say it was the fault of Republicans — who had previously negotiated the bill in a bipartisan manner — because of course they did.  Today [3/26/2020], the paper of record went back to the old steadfast during this crisis, which is to try to create panic in order to score political points.

'Economist' Runs Chinese Coronavirus Propaganda Disguised as News.  The Economist is running Chinese propaganda from an outlet that is violating U.S. law to spread the message that Chinese president Xi Jinping has done a masterful job handling the coronavirus pandemic.  The propaganda advertorials, which are ads designed to look like news stories, come from the Beijing Review, an entity backed by the Chinese Communist Party.  The outlet has never registered with the Department of Justice as required by the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) and does not include a legally required disclaimer that the ad is being pushed by a foreign nation.

How the Mainstream Media Sweep Their Mistakes Under the Rug.  The online news outlet Axios on Wednesday [3/18/2020] published a bombshell news story:  Bernie Sanders, reporter Alexi McCammond wrote, was suspending his presidential campaign.  "It's an end to the campaign of the leading progressive in the race — and the candidate who seemed to be the clear front-runner for the Democratic nomination less than a month ago," the report stated.  The only problem:  It wasn't true.  And this wasn't a run-of-the mill error, but a miscue on arguably the most anticipated (and inevitable) political story in the country.  What followed from Axios was not an explanation to its readers of how it got the story wrong, but an excuse for how it was mistakenly published (Axios editor in chief Nicholas Johnston blamed process breakdown in a "fully remote" newsroom).  Axios's response was an exercise in obfuscation and blame shifting.

The Liberal Media's Credibility Crashes.  Working hand-in-hand with their Democrat allies, the first cry of "Wolf!" was the Trump-Russia collusion fairy tale.  It was a ridiculous story on the face of it.  His media antagonists might hate the guy, but to believe he was stupid enough to try and steal the presidency with help from Vladimir Putin was bizarre beyond belief.  Finally the long-awaited (by the LSM) Mueller report was issued, followed by Mueller's appalling performance at a congressional hearing, in which he appeared to not know what was in his own report.  There was no collusion to be found.  Shocking — not.  The result for the Trump-Russia collusion media?  Here was this report from right here at the Daily Caller, Maddow's ratings were down 17%.

When Wuhan Virus Departs, World Will Be Changed.  [Scroll down]  Hardest hit of all, however, is the media, whose anti-Trump mania, reliance on manipulative if not imaginary "anonymous sources," eagerness to be seduced by former members of the intelligence community, general ignorance of almost every specialized field they encounter, political naiveté, and absolute fidelity to the party line ("Wuhan" is now racist) has rendered a once-proud profession little more than a mouthpiece for the Democratic National Committee and a constant reproach to truth, justice, and the American way.  At a time of dying newspapers and laid-off reporters, the media has chosen to go down with its "principles," rather than adhering to its former standards of objectivity and professionalism.  They wanted "change" and now they've got it[.]

The American press's entire energy is bent towards destroying Trump.  The mainstream American media have abandoned journalism's formerly-prized ethos of "who, what, where, why, when."  There is no pretense anymore that they serve a purpose other than maligning Donald Trump in the hope of destroying his presidency. [...] The media are currently outraged that Republicans are less panicked by the coronavirus than Democrats are.  Part of that may be because Democrats are ruled more by emotion than by reason.  A lot of it, though, is because Republicans have no reason to trust the media.  If members of the media believe that saying something will hurt Trump, they'll say it — and that's true whether what they're saying is honest or not.  If the media hysterically use coronavirus to attack Trump, Republicans instinctively assume (a) that coronavirus isn't that bad and (b) that Trump's doing an excellent job of handling it.

The Media Succumb to Raging Case of Katrina Virus in Hopes of Infecting Trump.  Democrats in the news media say that President George W. Bush botched the response to Hurricane Katrina in 2005. To the extent that Bush could convince the mayor of New Orleans and the governor of Louisiana to declare an emergency and order mandatory evacuations, then, sure, it was all his fault.  Sigh.  Bush was mocked for using the FEMA trailers for emergency housing after the storm, even though they're often used for that purpose all over the country.  He was blamed for failing to put all of the first responders in the direct path of the storm, instead of where they were stationed, just outside of the area to keep them safe until the storm passed but close enough to swarm the area.  He was blamed for the levee failures.  He was blamed for people staying in the 9th Ward when the storm surge flooded them out.  Brian Williams pretended to see "bodies floating" in the French Quarter (a lie).  Wolf Blitzer incited a racist narrative, calling the victims "so poor, so black."  Kanye West declared that "George Bush doesn't care about black people."  Babies were being "raped" in the Superdome.  On and on it went.

How a Soros Trojan Horse Took Down Chris Matthews and Is Poised to Bully Others into Submission.  With hundreds of millions of dollars from billionaire financier George Soros and dozens of his comrades-in-arms at the "Democracy Alliance," the progressive network of labor unions, activist investment firms, social justice organizations, and ideological media outlets is the tip of the spear in "cancel" culture. [...] These groups and outlets, working in concert, orchestrated the downfall of Fox News host Bill O'Reilly, targeted Breitbart, and attempted to knock Laura Ingraham off the air through advertiser boycotts.  Ultraviolet, in particular, led the anti-Kavanaugh protests — projecting "Kavanaugh is a sexual predator" onto the D.C. Court of Appeals where he sat before joining the highest court, running TV ads, and having their paid staff confront then-Senator Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) in a Senate elevator to convince him to oppose Kavanaugh.  Armed with unending funds from the Democracy Alliance donors, Ultraviolet's press releases are often re-packaged and published as "news" by Huffington Post writers, including Bassett.  Bassett also received awards from the neo-Malthusian and Democracy Alliance-funded Population Institute and Planned Parenthood for her pro-abortion reporting.

Stone Sentencing Ends Russia Collusion, Part I.  The Roger Stone sentencing farce is as fitting an end to the Russia Collusion saga as one could conjure up ... though it might be more fitting to call it the end of Russia Collusion, Part I.  No sooner did the first flick conclusively bomb than the media-Democrat complex was issuing the casting call for Russia Collusion, Part II.  In the sequel, you're asked to believe that Putin is manipulating the chesspieces to steal a second term for President Trump — somehow preferring an incumbent who beefs up the U.S. armed forces, pressures NATO allies to beef up theirs, imposes painful sanctions on Moscow, provides lethal aid to Ukraine, ramps up U.S. energy production, and seeks to thwart the Kremlin's coveted natural-gas partnership with Germany, over an unabashed socialist who honeymooned in the Soviet Union and whose policies would wreck the American economy, end the resurgence of American energy production, and hollow out the American armed forces.  It's a lunatic plot.

The Washington Post (CIA) is Very Worried About The Big Russia Lie Being Exposed.  The media PR firm for the FBI and DOJ objectives is the New York Times.  The media PR firm for the State Department is CNN.  The media PR firm for the CIA is The Washington Post.  This pattern has existed for several years.  The Washington Post is very concerned about a growing possibility the investigation into the origin of intelligence community work may expose the fraudulent nature of the entire 'Russian Election Interference Collusion-Conspiracy' narrative.  Very concerned.  The WaPo/CIA express concern by stating that President Trump is attempting to "rewrite history"; disingenuously skipping the part where Trump isn't attempting anything.  For more than three years President Trump has simply pointed out the obvious.  It is is the media and the intelligence apparatus that set up a fictitious narrative for political needs.

Trump Slams Media Over 'Fake News' Border Wall Report.  Ahead of making his crowd-thrilling appearance at the Daytona 500 Sunday, President Trump added one more media-slamming post to a series of tweets he'd issued over the weekend hammering one of the central promises of his 2016 election: that he would "build the wall."  "Last week the Fake News said that a section of our powerful, under construction, Southern Border Wall 'fell over', trying to make it sound terrible, except the reason was that the concrete foundation was just poured [and] soaking wet when big winds kicked in.  Quickly fixed 'forever'," the president wrote Sunday [2/16/2020].

It was Obama, not Trump, who weaponized government against political opponents.  The media frequently buries stories that might hurt political candidates or policies they support and will continually run false stories against political candidates and policies they oppose.  How else can it explain the years of fake stories on Russian collusion, seeking to destroy white Christian boys for wearing MAGA hats, trying to destroy Supreme Court Justice nominee Brett Kavanaugh with no evidence, the false "Hands up, don't shoot" narrative?  How else do you explain the burying of stories about all the mental and sexual abuse of women by the Clintons and the burying of stories or the lack of investigation into the clear corruption and kickbacks of the Clintons and Bidens if not pure bias?  How many people are the media willing to destroy in order to get power back for the Democrats?

Four major journalistic errors in just 10 hours.  The New York Times's Maggie Haberman, for example, tweeted the following falsehood at around 5:30 p.m. Monday evening:  "Republican voter registration in NH is down roughly 20k voters from 2016 to now.  It's a reminder that Trump's increased GOP popularity is in part because in some places, the GOP registration rolls have shrunk."  This is not only false, but it has been debunked several times.  At some point, repeating the lie becomes a choice.  Earlier than that, MSNBC's Katy Tur, who hosts a politics news show, sought to throw cold water on the strong economic numbers touted by the Trump White House, arguing that the economy is not working for the individual who spends up to 360 months paying off his car loan. [...] Car loans can take anywhere between 12 and 84 months to pay off.  Who are these people agreeing to 30-year car loans?

Fake news:
Pentagon racks up $35 trillion in accounting changes in a year.  The Pentagon made $35 trillion in accounting adjustments last year alone — a total that's larger than the entire U.S. economy and underscores the Defense Department's continuing difficulty in balancing its books.

Rebuttal / clarification:
What Do You Mean You Need to Move 35 Trillion (with a "T") Dollars at the Pentagon?  In an article from MSM, Tony Capaccio at Bloomberg (note — this is Bloomberg reporting in an election year where Michael Bloomberg is prepared to spend billions to defeat our President), wrote a story about the "stark increase in accounting changes at the Pentagon", changes of 35 Trillion in 2019, 30.7 trillion in 2018, and 29 Trillion in 2017.  Note the phrase "accounting changes".  Tony Capaccio, to make this a bigger story and imply wrongdoing, using all the MSM approved salacious adjectives, interviews the GAO about the "problem" of the increase in accounting changes.  Note, we're supposed to be concerned about an increase in accounting entries but NO ONE said any money is missing.  Plus, remember, GAO is an arm of CONGRESS (read as Pelosi), and the Pentagon in the Executive Branch (read as Trump).

Fact-Checkers Have Become the Janissaries of the Obama Legacy.  For me, at least, the most grating aspect of contemporary "fact-checking" isn't the dubious journalistic nature of the project, or the endlessly nitpicking of every Republican utterance, whether it's particularly misleading or not.  It's the increasingly popular effort to try to credit Barack Obama for everything good that's happened during Donald Trump's presidency.

The Editor says...
I hope you remember that Barack H. Obama, with the eager support of the news media, blamed George W. Bush for every bad thing that happened in Obama's entire eight-year presidency.

Media Continues Dishonesty On Dershowitz's Argument Against Impeachment.  Last week when it was announced that Alan Dershowitz was joining President Trump's legal team, I warned in these pages that his complex argument in the alternative, in which he claims that even if proven what Democrats allege regarding Ukraine does not rise to the level of impeachment, was ripe for mischaracterization.  The news media has not disappointed on that score.  The first misunderstanding came just hours after the announcement of his role.  Many in the news media erroneously claimed that Dershowitz, and by extension Trump's legal team, were conceding wrongdoing, and that Republicans were moving the goalposts away from a "perfect call."  This was never true, but was too attractive a narrative for many to pass up.  Yesterday [1/29/2020] the deceptive coverage of Dershowitz got even worse.

Media ignore Adam Schiff's record of lying, fawn over him as hero of impeachment proceedings.  Democratic Congressman Adam Schiff of California showed himself to be a liar during the special counsel's investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election, repeatedly claiming to have knowledge of "direct" and "ample" evidence proving President Trump's campaign colluded with the Kremlin.  Yet despite outing himself as an untrustworthy partisan operative, many of the same members of the press who uncritically parroted Schiff and members the intelligence community during the collusion and FBI spying episodes are promoting the congressman now as a heroic and awe-inspiring manager of the impeachment proceedings; because we have learned nothing from the last three years.

This is why nobody cares about the impeachment trial.  Does there exist a more unabashed partisan than Adam Schiff? [...] Over and over again Schiff repeats things about the president that are, to the objective observer, not criminal, not impeachable, and driven by contempt.  You don't have to be a die-hard Trump homer to see that Democrats do not have the impeachment goods they said they had, and they knew from the get-go that this was going nowhere in the Senate, so they set out to stage a production, a spectacle to tarnish the president and the GOP while signaling their own virtue.  This is clear, even to ordinary Americans like myself.  Yet the liberal media, with its high level of self-importance and low level of self-awareness, acts like each boring, fanciful, inconsequential monologue is the newest iteration of the "I Have a Dream" speech.

Fake News:  No, a Christian School Didn't Expel a Girl Over a Rainbow Cake.  Last week, liberal media outlets latched onto the latest horrific example of bigoted Christians forcing their morality on everyone else:  a Christian school expelling a girl for posting a picture of herself wearing a rainbow sweatshirt and eating a rainbow cake on Facebook.  According to the girl's mother, the Christian school rushed to judgment and expelled her daughter, who isn't even gay, over a birthday cake!  This narrative, which plays into the biases of many liberal journalists and LGBT activists, is just as wrong as the narrative of Covington Catholic teen Nick Sandmann disrespecting a Native American man.  As it turns out, the school had good reason to expel the girl — and it involved a great deal more than one innocent birthday cake.

On the other hand...
China's coronavirus outbreak looks worse than the Chicoms are admitting.  Communist regimes are famous for concealing inconvenient information and that appears to be the case in China with the spread of the coronavirus, a SARS-linked pneumonia-like flu that reportedly has killed 26, infected nearly a thousand, and spread to to more than a half a dozen countries beyond China, including the U.S. The Chinese have got 20 million people on lockdown in Wuhan and several cities near it, just as the Chinese New Year begins, which is the entire region's biggest holiday.  It's pretty obvious the epidemic is spreading anyway.  Officials, culpably or not, closed the barn door after the horse got out.

GOP senators: don't overthink impeachment scam.  "Journalists" on TV and radio lie routinely, without a conscience.  They vote Democrat.  They love their party.  They have to pay.  The news media have exacerbated the impeachment scam.  And apparent #NeverTrump GOP senators have believed the news media lies.

Media, Using Anonymous Sources, Have Presented 4 Separate Narratives Surrounding Trump And Soleimani.  When and how did President Donald Trump come up with the decision to have Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani killed?  That's the question the media seems to have been asking for the past week — and so far, they've come up with wildly different answers.  Using the oh-so-tired "anonymous sources" trick, media outlets have reported everything from Trump wanted Soleimani dead back in 2017 to suggesting it was actually Secretary of State Mike Pompeo who pushed for the killing.  Here are the four completely contradictory narratives the media have "reported," all based on anonymous officials: [...]

Photographer Mark Peterson Shows Patriots Can't Trust The Lying Press.  I must admit I was surprised that the Main Stream Media responded to the emergent internet's ability to debunk its propaganda (Duke Lacrosse, UVA Rape Hoax, Covington Catholic) by becoming even more flagrantly partisan (besides, of course, calling for internet censorship). Aren't markets supposed to clear?  But the result is that the myth of journalism as an impartial profession, which was receiving pious lip-service as recently as fifteen years ago, is now believed by no-one under 35.  A practical consequence for me:  I've stopped accepting interviews with the MSM except by email — which is why I have on record Andrew Lawler's malice and mendacity in The Secret Token, his book on Virginia Dare.  But Jared Taylor's experience, cross-posted here, suggests you can't even let the swine take photographs.

Media Beclowns Itself Spreading Fake News and Anti-Trump Propaganda During Iranian Missile Attack.  As Iranian missiles rained down on U.S. military targets in Iraq Tuesday night [1/7/2020], two cable news outlets, MSNBC and CNN, spread fake news that suggested that the damage was worse than it was.  The Pentagon confirmed that Tehran fired more than 12 ballistic missiles targeting two military bases used by US and coalition forces in Iraq.  During a broadcast of Hardball on MSNBC, NBC News Tehran bureau chief Ali Arouzi parroted Iranian state media propaganda claiming erroneously that Iranian rockets had killed 30 American soldiers.

Media Falsely Claims Vice President Pence is Wrong About Suleimani and 9/11 Attackers.  On January 3, 2020, Vice President Mike Pence tweeted this about General Suleimani:  [Tweets]  The New York Times responded that the public record does not back him up.  The Los Angeles Times claims Pence falsely links Iranian general to 9/11 attacks.  Both newspapers and the others echoing them are lying or just wrong.  The public record actually does back up the Vice President completely.  All one need do is look at the 9/11 Commission report on page 241.

Deutsche Bank Fake News Story Debunked.  [Scroll down]  In another chapter of the Great Trump Conspiracy, A Deutsch Bank whistle blower had revealed that a State Run Russian Bank had funded all of the institution's loans to Donald Trump for many years.  Thousands of Tweets with that tag.  I counted more than 40 good size pages who picked up the story.  Yet not one major source.  This is what fake news smells like!  And the digging began. [...] So the moral of the story is this, my friends.  Don't be stupid.  90% of what you see on the web is garbage, and fake news is now big business.  Stop clicking links spouting sensationalist garbage that you know full well most likely isn't true just on the off chance that it might be true.  It isn't.

The Media Is Lying About The Attacks On The Embassy In Baghdad.  You can tell that the Obama administration's legacy in the Middle East is in danger because the media, as the self-appointed janitors of that legacy, have gone into overdrive obfuscating the timing, context, and significance of this week's attack on the United States embassy in Baghdad.  Although President Donald Trump has gone a long way to dismantling Obama's legacy in the region, much more remains to be done, including a halt to American taxpayer money that has been flowing into Iranian-controlled governments in Iraq and Lebanon.  Earlier this week Iran-backed militias stormed the U.S. embassy in Baghdad, chanting "Down, down USA!" and hurling water bottles and smashing security cameras.  The attackers breached parts of the embassy and were only disbursed the next day, after Trump deployed Marines to ensure the safety of our embassy personnel and property.

New Year Ahead:  Nothing Will Help Them.  The mainstream media has little to look forward to as their fanciful reportage comes undone.  Newsrooms are shedding staff and the papers facing lawsuits by the Covington kids are getting thinner and thinner.  The movie Richard Jewell exposes the media incompetence and partisanship at the cost of truth.  The Washington Post is now so slim my free neighborhood flyer has more copy than it does.

Making Journalism Great Again.  [Scroll down]  You would think that the reporters writing the stories were, like meteorologists, predicting tomorrow's news, rather than recording for posterity known facts and affairs.  It is said that gross inaccuracy should be tolerated in the news business because reporters, even when very wrong, manage to reveal important unknown events when allowed to "chase a story" like a detective unearthing a clue.  When you flip through a year's worth of pages now bleeding scarlet red dye, though, it is not courage but shame that comes to mind.  How many red-encircled headlines should be endured before reaching the conclusion that this is not "news" but speculative fiction or straight-up propaganda?  Is there a certain percentage of inaccuracy that we could all agree is impermissible?  Would coastal newspapers still feel haughty if they had to print disclaimers below the fold stating that forty percent or more of what you are about to read might later be proven to be false?

A Decade of Fake News.  The idea of a "decade in review" article at the end of 2019 is a bit of "fake news."  Technically, the current decade does not end until December 31, 2020.  In that spirit, it is worth looking back at the past ten years through the "fake news" lens.  These were years in which the mainstream media used false allegations and biased reporting to suppress conservative voices; they were also the first years in which, thanks to Andrew Breitbart, we began to resist them.

Media Standing Up For Antifa.  Antifa, a left-wing movement to counter the fascist "alt-right" by conducting acts of domestic terrorism has been defended by the media as principled individuals united in their common valor to resist the anti-Trump forces threatening to destroy the country.  Exactly how Antifa is pursuing their mission?  By destroying the country.  Throughout the year the left-wing militant group has interrupted events and viciously attacked journalists covering their hate resulting in one reporter suffering a brain injury.  "It says it right in the name.  'Antifa,' which means 'anti-fascism,' which is what they were there fighting.  Listen, no organization is perfect, there is some violence," CNN's Don Lemon said.  "They have taken a principled stand to stand against white supremacists and white nationalists wherever they may show up," said a guest on MSNBC.

The Media's Worst Moments of 2019.  Our friends at Grabien prepared this montage of some of the media's worst moments of 2019.  Given the media malpractice of the last year, the video could be the length of Ben-Hur, but they've whittled it down to a mere eight minutes.  And it is a fun walk down memory lane, as pretty much all of the media's worst moments have, by now, blown up in their faces.  [Video clip]

Unfit To Print Episode 34: IG Report Debunks Media's Biggest Lies.  The IG report on FISA abuse finally dropped this week, and the media is still reeling from all of the lies it uncovered.  [Audio clip]

Schiff and Complicit Media Are Due For a Reckoning After IG Report Exposed Their Lies.  Now that the inspector general report on FISA abuse has vindicated the work of Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA), the former chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, and thoroughly debunked the fraudulent conspiracy theories and smears of the current chairman Adam Schiff, many conservatives are crying out for retribution.  At the very least, Schiff should face an ethics complaint for lying in his memo, American Commitment President Phil Kerpen says.

Our Outrage Over the Dems' Impeachment Farce.  The most infuriating thing about Democrats and fake news medias' fake outrage over Trump's alleged crimes is everyone knows Trump has done nothing wrong.  He has functioned totally within his presidential authority.  Democrats and media are attempting to criminalize Trump defending himself while exposing their corruption.  The only thing Trump is guilty of is keeping his promise to do everything within his power to make America great again.  Folks, it feels like we are in an episode of "The Twilight Zone" in which Democrats' and medias' reality is the polar opposite of the truth.  With straight faces, they authoritatively lie about every issue.  Our economy is booming.  And yet, Democrats and media say people are suffering horribly in Trump's economy.  Blacks are enjoying a historic low unemployment rate.  Dems and media tell blacks Trump is a white supremacist seeking to harm them.

OAN Investigative Report:  Ukraine, Biden, and Far-Left Media Malpractice.  This is Deep State chicanery exposed for all the world to see — IF they are willing to pay attention.  When the far-left media claims there is "no evidence" of wrongdoing by Joe Biden, Ukraine, Obama administration officials, etc., they are pushing an outright lie.  The evidence is clear, it's available, and it's incredibly damning to the wrongdoers involved as is so clearly outlined in the following OAN news report:  [Video clip]

CrowdStrike: a Conspiracy Wrapped in a Conspiracy Inside a Conspiracy.  Long story short, the Democrat-media complex has successfully convinced one half of the world that Trump is a Russian agent.  Now they're acting as if they'd spent the last three years in a coma, unaware of any bombshell stories about collusion.  And bombshell stories without any continuation are a telltale sign of fake narratives.  The only consequence of these bombshells is mass amnesia among the foot soldiers.  The Trump-Russian outrage is dead, long live the Trump-Ukraine outrage.  And when that outrage is dead, the next outrage that will be just outrageous.  The current impeachment narrative alleges that Trump used military aid as leverage in asking Ukraine to dig up dirt on Joe Biden (which implies the Democrats know Biden is dirty, otherwise why bother?). What's not in this picture is CrowdStrike.  Even though Trump mentioned it in the phone call, it has nothing to do with the Bidens nor the Javelin missiles.  CrowdStrike has nothing to do with impeachment.  We're told it's just a silly conspiracy theory in Trump's head, that it's a nonissue.

Media's Latest Anti-Nunes Smear Is Michael-Cohen-In-Prague All Over Again.  Devin Nunes' opponents in the Resistance seem to be spiraling.  Their latest effort against the top Republican on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence is to accuse him, without evidence, of secretly meeting in Vienna with a former Ukrainian official "to get dirt on Biden."  The official is former Ukrainian prosecutor general Viktor Shokin, who former Vice President Joe Biden famously bragged about getting fired in exchange for $1 billion in loan guarantees from American taxpayers.  Incidentally, if there is one thing we have learned from the media in the last couple of months, "get dirt" is their code for Republicans doing investigations.  "Investigate" is their code for Democrats trying to get dirt on political opponents.  It appears the same term could be used regardless of the political views of those doing the investigations.

Media Hypes Fusion GPS Founders as Victims.  It's a little like the proverbial child killing its parents and throwing itself on the mercy of the court because he's now an orphan, but, with the wheels of Barr-Durham-Horowitz justice inexorably turning on them, there are Fusion GPS founders, Glenn Simpson and Peter Fritsch, on a media book tour claiming they are the victims of right-wing vengeance for their role in orchestrating a criminal fraud upon the FISA court and a coup against a sitting president of the United States.

60 Minutes gives us a migrant sob story except that all signs suggest the migrant is pretty rich.  The news show began with a sad story of Tania Avalos, who, along with her purported husband and daughter, attempted to cross the rain-swollen Rio Grande river illegally, resulting in two deaths.  60vMinutes matched the event to a widely reported news photo of the two dead bodies in the river.  The man who died was Óscar Alberto Mart'nez Ram'rez, and toddler was named Valeria.  The news show never got around to asking why the last names of the parents did not match, and tellingly, never gave the last name of the father which is kind of an indicator of something they don't want us to know.  After all, 'who, what, where...' — the old news industry standard.  Were they really a family or were they cobbling together a fake family to take advantage of asylum laws as large numbers of migrants do?  They certainly knew enough about it to understand that they were to surrender to the Border Patrol, so they weren't utter naifs as they had been portrayed in terms of their odds.

Reuters Deletes Story Meant to Make Trump Look Bad After Realizing it Made Obama Look Bad.  Reuters completely deleted a wire story concerning the number of children in migrant detention centers after discovering that the author's figures were from 2015 and do not reflect the current number of children in such centers.  Adding an editor's note or something of the like was tossed for a complete revocation, which is always last and worst case scenario in the news world.

Nets Cheer Sondland 'Directly Implicating' Trump, Then Admit He Didn't.  During an 11:00 a.m. ET hour break in Wednesday's [11/20/2019] impeachment hearing, all three broadcast networks eagerly proclaimed the U.S. Ambassador to the European Union, Gordon Sondland, was "directly implicating" President Trump in a "quid pro quo" with Ukraine.  However, just minutes later, those same networks admitted that Sondland never heard any such thing directly from the President.  "Well, Gordon Sondland, clearly the man of the hour there, as we are halfway through the questioning," Nightly News anchor Lester Holt declared during NBC's special coverage.  He further claimed that Sondland "dropped a lot of bombshells" and "Is now implicating the President directly."  He emphasized that Sondland "had direct communications with the President." [...] The only problem with those pronouncements?  They weren't true.

Nixon's Lessons for the Would-Be Impeachers.  One of the nauseating permutations of public recollection that has arisen out of the attempts to destroy Trump is that Richard Nixon was treated fairly.This fraud is buttressed by the frequent appearances on our screens of the chief trigger-men in that bloodless assassination: the unspeakable turncoat White House lawyer John Dean and Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, still padding around on the imperishable fuel of the Watergate putsch, festooned with the awards the media give themselves.

Impeachment surprise:  How Adam Schiff validated my reporting on Ukraine.  For weeks, media have claimed my Biden column was a debunked "conspiracy theory" and no one saw anything wrong.  Now we know the very people working on Ukraine policy below Joe Biden in the State Department saw the appearance of a conflict, long before I reported it.  And they were so concerned about Burisma's corruption reputation that they took official actions to distance the U.S. from the firm that hired Hunter Biden.

New York Times Admits No One Believes the Liberal News Media Anymore.  Here's an excerpt from the Trump-hating New York Times.  ["]But just when information is needed most, to many Americans it feels most elusive.  The rise of social media; the proliferation of information online, including news designed to deceive; and a flood of partisan news are leading to a general exhaustion with news itself.["]

Here's How Impeachment Helps Democrats Even If They Fail.  Today's Democrat Party is a joke that would cease to exist if not for the unwavering support of the massively powerful corporate media.  Long before this revelation, it always amused me when people like Resistance Jake Tapper or others in the media would claim:  "We don't choose the stories.  The stories choose us.  All we're doing is reporting what's going on in the world.  That's our job."  It amused me because they literally write the headlines.  They choose exactly what stories to cover.  As has become painfully obvious to anyone with a pulse, they also choose the narratives attached to those stories and how every twist and turn is characterized throughout the 24/7 news cycle.  If you couple those realities — that the media are nothing more than Democrats' marketing arm, and that they're responsible for deciding what we talk about and how it's characterized — it becomes really hard to take "the news" seriously.

The View's Joy Behar:  Buttigieg Has a 'Very Traditional Marriage'.  Joy Behar, co-host of "The View," expressed her support of Democratic presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg on Monday, saying that the mayor of South Bend, Ind., is "in a very traditional marriage."  Traditional marriage is defined as the union between one man and one woman.

When Did Ukraine Become a 'Critical Ally'?  On hearing the State Department's George Kent and William Taylor describe President Donald Trump's withholding of military aid to Ukraine, The New York Times summarized and solemnly endorsed their testimony:  "What clearly concerned both witnesses wasn't simply the abuse of power by the President, but the harm it inflicted on Ukraine, a critical ally, under constant assault by Russian forces." [...] "One would think, listening to this," writes Barbara Boland, the American Conservative columnist, "that the U.S. had always provided arms to Ukraine, and that Ukraine has relied on this aid for years.  But this is untrue and the Washington blob knows this."  Indeed, Ukraine has never been a NATO ally or a "critical ally."

President Trump. vs. the Media.  Since Trump defeated Hillary Clinton in the 2016 Presidential election, leftists in the mainstream media, which is to say virtually all of the mainstream media have abandoned nearly every pretense about who they are, what they represent, and what are their goals.  It is safe to say that many of the problems we face in America today are directly attributable to the fact that, because of their warped worldview, the vast majority of the American media simply won't tell the truth.  This is especially troubling when one considers that the American media has lied and continues to lie on almost every moral issue debated in America.

Trump Derangement Syndrome on Steroids.  The American Prospect's Paul Waldman gives us an earful about President Trump and how Trump is destroying everything that's good and decent in America. [...] What strikes me is Waldman's unchecked assertion that Trump's accountability "has been in short supply."  He wholly ignores that Democrats have been feverishly pursuing Trump since he announced his candidacy.  For two years, they've prosecuted a bogus case on Trump "colluding" with Russia, guaranteeing they had unimpeachable evidence.  They were lying, and their would-be savior, special counsel Robert Mueller, produced no evidence of collusion.  Accountability?  Why haven't the Democrats had to answer for their wasting taxpayers' time and money over this lie?  Neither they nor their legacy media co-conspirators have uttered one syllable of apology to the American people, let alone President Trump, for dragging us through this nightmare.

Killing America in anonymity.  The media tells us there is a "heroic" whistle blower who claims President Donald John Trump broke a law — never specified — in a phone call to the newly elected president of Ukraine.  President Trump released the transcript of the call, which shows nothing of the sort.  Nevertheless, the media is pushing for an impeachment to boost cable news ratings, and to divert attention from the best economy in 50 years, Disney's ABC covering up Clinton's involvement with pedophile Jeff Epstein, and peace breaking out in Syria after 8 years of war.  But the media is deliberately refusing to name Eric Ciaramella as the Obamanaut who spied on the Trump administration from within, just as Obama ordered the FBI to wiretap the Trump campaign.

Where were the whistleblowers on foreign policy during Obama's terms?  [Scroll down]  Instead of the media being unbiased observers and reporters, they have been active participants in the indoctrination of the public that Trump is a lawbreaker, ignores the Constitution and is a racist, homophobe, xenophobe, dictator and fascists among other names as they say Trump is divisive.  The meddling by the media to destroy Trump and elect Democrats is much more dangerous to the integrity of our elections than anything Russia or any other foreign country has or is doing.  When the media is intentionally peddling false stories about Russian collusion, lies about what Trump said about Charlottesville, blocking opposing views on climate change, attacking Kavanaugh with no evidence or burying the Jeffrey Epstein story they are campaigners, not reporters.  They are anything but fact checkers.

Attenborough Tacitly Admits Netflix on 'Walrusgate' Tragedy Porn.  It was one of the most heart-rending animal tragedy episodes ever shown on TV:  hundreds of walruses shown plunging over a cliff to their deaths out of "desperation" caused by climate change.  Or so the story originally went when Sir David Attenborough first told it last year on his Netflix documentary Our Planet, causing much upset to impressionable viewers.

The Washington Post's Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Week.  A top National Security Council official, Tim Morrison, who listened to President Donald Trump's July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymr Zelensky, testified in front of Congress on Thursday.  But that morning, ahead of the testimony, senior political reporter Aaron Blake reported that Morrison would confirm acting U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Bill Taylor's account that Trump appeared to seek a quid pro quo.  In fact, the opposite happened.  Morrison noted the multiple false assertions made by Taylor, and testified that he never thought anything illegal was discussed on the phone call.

Media-Democrat Tantrum [is] a Fear Response.  Media bias comes in many forms, but one of the most effective forms is in their ability to frame stories.  There is an entire cottage industry in "Republicans pounce" stories to frame even terrible Democrat news as somehow harmful to Republicans.  But to frame this story the way the media want to frame it, they needed help.  This is why we now have dueling investigations, one a complete façade and the other deadly serious.  There is no secret in how these will be covered by the media.  The fraud impeachment circus will be treated with full gravity and seriousness, while what might be the most important investigation in U.S. history will be treated as political payback.

Counting the Ways the Washington Post Loves Them Some al-Baghdadi.  I knew the usual suspects at our failing, far-left, fake news outlets such as CNN, NBC News, the New York Times, and Washington Post, would attempt to spin one of America's great days as the exact opposite.  We would be told audacious lies about how taking out al-Baghdadi would only make things worse, only proves Trump's Syria policy is a disaster, how this successful mission happened in spite of Trump, and that Trump's perfectly-calibrated statement and willingness to answer the media's questions at length would be twisted into a crass victory lap.  But even I, your humble writer, was floored when the Washington Post lamented the loss of that dear, sweet man al-Baghdadi — a vile terrorist responsible for thousands of innocent deaths, a monster who engaged in serial rape, and a sub-human, barbaric sociopath whose entire legacy is one of torture, murder, rape, tyranny and terror — including of his own people.

FNC screen grab
Unfortunately Fox News Continues Deliberate Misinformation.  Moments ago Fox News host Shannon Bream promoted a segment on her news program outlining the pending House 'Impeachment Inquiry' resolution scheduled for tomorrow [10/31/2019].  During the broadcast segment Bream stated, falsely, that President Trump would be granted the following participatory measures as an outcome of the resolution:  [Screen-grab]  This is deliberately false information.  The resolution does not convey any of the outlined measures to the Executive Branch.


White House Knocks Washington Post 'Religious Scholar' Terrorist Obituary.  The White House on Monday [10/28/2019] knocked the Washington Post obituary for founder of the Islamic State terrorist organization Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi after he was killed during a United States raid on Saturday.  "Despite what the Washington Post wants you to think, this was not some religious leader, a religious scholar, this was a terrorist, a disgusting man with a record of death and viciousness and destruction," White House Deputy Press Secretary Hogan Gidley said in a Fox News interview on Monday.

Social media parodies the Washington Post's tone-deaf obituary headline that called ISIS leader al-Baghdadi an 'austere religious scholar'.  A Washington Post obituary referring to Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi as an 'austere religious scholar' after the ISIS mastermind was killed in a US military strike has sparked a deluge of death tribute parodies on Twitter.  The newspaper came under fire on Sunday after it changed the headline on al-Baghdadi's obituary two times — first calling him 'terrorist-in-chief', followed by 'austere religious leader at the helm of ISIS' and finally 'extremist leader'.  Twitter users seized on the second iteration, accusing The Post of painting al-Baghdadi in an inappropriately positive light given the brutality he championed while leading the terrorist organization.

Washington Post headline
Washington Post headline:  "Austere religious scholar at helm of Islamic State dies at 48.".  Look at this, on the front-page at The Washington Post:  [Illustration]  It's as though the paper is honoring him.  I wonder how long that will stay on the front page in that form.  It's the teaser for [an] obituary, and there is another article — to the left — about the military raid, "Trump says Islamic State leader Baghdadi blew himself up as U.S. troops closed in."  Note how that forefronts Baghdadi's agency.  He "blew himself up."  If you click through to the obituary, the headline is different — "Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, Islamic State's 'terrorist-in-chief,' dies at 48."  So that makes the form of the headline on the front page even more startling — "Austere religious scholar..."


Washington Post Columnist, CNN Analyst Suggests Al-Baghdadi Did Not Die Like a 'Coward'Washington Post columnist Max Boot on Monday [10/28/2019] suggested ISIS founder and leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi did not die like a "coward" as President Trump described on Sunday, arguing that the president's assertion is "contradicted by the fact that rather than be captured, he blew himself up."  Boot, who is both a Post columnist and CNN analyst, wrote in a column on Monday that Trump turned al-Baghdadi's death into another "risible spectacle."

NY Times:  Trump Gets No Credit for Baghdadi Raid.  The Washington Post says al-Baghdadi was just an "austere religious scholar," but if you don't buy that line the New York Times has another hot take: the successful raid on Baghdadi's hideout occurred despite, not because of, President Trump: [...] These are no doubt the same "military, intelligence and counterterrorism officials" who have been behind 5,000 or so previous anti-Trump stories in the Times.  As William Jacobson points out, there is nothing to the Times story.  Intelligence sources located Baghdadi, the military asked for permission to go after him, Trump granted permission, and the raid was carried out successfully.  The Times has nothing.

Washington Post columnist issues correction after claiming Baghdadi [was] not a coward.  The Washington Post was forced to issue a correction after columnist Max Boot said Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al Baghdadi was not a coward because he evaded capture by committing suicide.  Boot initially stated in his Monday [10/28/2019] column that, "The assertion that Baghdadi died as a coward was, in any case, contradicted by the fact that rather than be captured, he blew himself up."  After backlash from people accusing Boot of praising Baghdadi in an attempt to make a dig at President Trump, the Washington Post deleted the line and issued a correction.

Washington Post Mourns Passing of "Austere Religious Scholar" Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.  Reactions vary to the U.S. killing of ISIS terrorist chief Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.  However, perhaps the most alarming headline was the sympathetic obituary from The Washington Post: [...] The Washington Post was not alone in their sympathy over the killing of the brutal terrorist.  Bloomberg News also followed quickly with deep sympathies for the death of a leader who "transformed himself" into a "teacher of Koranic recitation": [...] In an era where the ideology of U.S. media has become increasingly disconnected from the majority of Americans, it is becoming less surprising to see radical leftist positions in mainstream organizations.  However, that said, for any U.S. media to position themselves as sympathetic to one of the most brutal terrorists in the last half-century, is a level of disconnect far beyond comprehension.

Trump economy surges and Biden and Obama hog the credit.  This is the continuing history rewrite of the left to explain the booming economy in the third year of Mr. Trump's presidency.  Today we are at or below record levels of unemployment, inflation and interest rates in half-a-century.  Wages and salaries are rising at their fastest clip in at least two decades.  There are an all-time high 7 million unfilled jobs in the United States.  The Washington Post is freaking out about the continued good news on the economy — and especially the latest data — that I reported on these pages two weeks ago that median household income is up by $5,003 since Mr. Trump became president.  This was based on Census data, but The Post ranted last week that Donald Trump continues to "inflate his own numbers."  Nearly every assertion in the article was wrong or twisted — and Mr. Trump was right.

The Russia hoax:  The Left's willful ignorance and denial.  As we see and hear leftists spew their anti-Trump vitriol all day long on CNN and MSNBC and the others, anchors and guests — Jake Tapper, Chuck Todd, Chris Wallace, and their favored guests, for example — one has to wonder, has not one of them ventured to read any of the books or the vast number of columns written by real journalists that have laid out in detail how the Russia hoax was orchestrated?  Who instigated it?  Who paid for it?  Even Friday [10/25/2019], after hearing that the Barr and Durham probes into the origins of the hoax are now criminal investigations, they all dismiss this bit of news as, get this, a political witch hunt!  Whereas they were actually conducting a secret search for a crime in deep, dark crevices where none existed, they now have the gall to call Barr's and Durham's investigations "political."

GOP Has A Choice:  Fight Anti-Trump Coup Effort Or Surrender Government To Democrats.  Corporate media is trying to spin the Ukraine story as if it is something other than what it is.  As if it were legitimate and quickly moving.  Mike Allen of Axios opined of impeachment that "It's remarkable how fast it has gotten off the ground.  You can see how quickly the Ukraine phone call came out of nowhere to become the all-consuming impeachment topic — way faster than the impeachment inquiries into Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton."  Yes, this is a really good talking point if you ignore literally everything that has happened since November 8, 2016. [...] Just as in 2000, the media screeching over Rep. Matt Gaetz and his colleagues fighting the secret efforts — which are literally being led by a man who lied to the public for years, falsely claiming he held evidence of Trump's treasonous collusion with Russia to steal the 2016 election — is not an objection to what Gaetz and his colleagues did but anger that some Republicans have the audacity to fight back against what Democrats and the corporate media are doing.

NY Times Wrote an Entire Fake Article About Ukraine 'Scandal'.  The New York Times alleged in a false news article that "Ukraine Knew of Aid Freeze by August, Undermining Trump Defense."  The Trump-Zelensky phone call was made the end of July.  There goes another NYT lie.  The August info didn't undermine anything.  It backed up the President.  The NYT wrote, "In fact, word of the aid freeze had gotten to high-level Ukrainian officials by the first week in August, according to interviews and documents obtained by The New York Times."  That is irrelevant since the call took place on July 29.

Seeing Some Trees in the Forest of Babble.  The hypnotic babble of the media beguiles otherwise intelligent people into believing that Russia colluded with President Trump to defeat Hillary Clinton, that Trump forced Ukraine into investigating Hunter Biden and did something, we can't say what, to be impeached, and that thousands of poor Kurds are being displaced because we pulled some hundreds of our troops from the Syrian-Turkish border.  Rational, fact-based analysis shows all this to be untrue, but breaking through this hazy thinking is not an easy task.  Maybe because that's the true aim: eradicating reason totally.

The Anatomy of a Terrible Liberal Media Lie.  I have to tell you a remarkable personal story, a story that proves the liberal media are, in fact, out to frame and ruin President Donald Trump and his supporters with lies, distortions and misrepresentation; a story that proves the liberal media are vicious, untrustworthy and sometimes just plain evil.  I was in Miami last weekend to speak in front of 1,200 conservatives at a fabulous three-day conference called AmpFest19.  Speakers also included Donald Trump Jr., Sarah Huckabee Sanders and Dinesh D'Souza.  The event was organized professionally.  The speakers were inspiring.  The crowd was enthusiastic.  And the energy was sky high.  But it turned out the liberal media sent spies into the audience to try to ruin, denigrate and demonize the event, and kill all the joy.

Here's why the media is lying to you about Mick Mulvaney's Ukraine comments.  Thursday night [10/17/2019] on the radio, LevinTV host Mark Levin discussed a press conference held by acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney held earlier that day and how the mainstream media covered it.  During the press briefing at the White House, Mulvaney explained that foreign aid to the Ukraine was held up over the summer in order to see if the country would commit to cooperate with an ongoing Department of Justice investigation regarding potential corruption in the 2016 election.  Several in the media said that the acting chief admitted to a "quid pro quo" with Ukrainian officials, which is central to Democrats' and the media's Trump impeachment narrative.  Mulvaney explained that conditioning aid money happens "all the time with foreign policy," adding that funding was being withheld from Central American countries at the same time in order to force their cooperation on immigration policy.

Journalists Have Become Hoaxers.  Big media played its part in the Trayvon hoax as in NBC doctoring George Zimmerman's 911 call to make Zimmerman appear a racist, providing a racial angle for his self-defense shooting of Trayvon Martin.  CNN referred to Zimmerman as a "white Hispanic" to keep the race angle front and center.  Did they ever refer to Barack Obama as "half black" given the white skin color of his mother?  Are these hoaxes accidental or deliberate?  Is this sloppy reporting or an attempt to shape a narrative rather than simply report the news?

Good Riddance to Shepard Smith.  Shepard Smith was the worst thing on Fox News not because he was an anti-Trump leftist, but because he lied and lied and lied, claiming he was not.  There are plenty of anti-Trump leftists on Fox News, and that's a good thing.  It is also to the eternal credit of Fox that, unlike its competition on the far left — CNN and MSNBC — Fox actually airs a legitimate diversity of opinions on the issues of the day, most especially President Trump.  That was not Shepard Smith.  No, rather than come out of the partisan closet, rather than put on the uniform, rather than step into the arena, like way too many in our perversely corrupt news media, he chose to hide like a coward behind a shield of objective truth, a shield of capital "J" journalism, which made him a dishonorable and thoroughly despicable liar — which is why his ratings were so awful.

The Curious Case of the Incurious Press.  Instead of expressing curiosity about why the Bidens had been the subject of a criminal investigation in Ukraine, reporters fell into lockstep with the Democrats' impeachment narrative.  Everywhere you turned for the last two weeks, whenever a reporter was talking about Biden at all, it was to talk about how he was being maligned by Trump, that he had been cleared of any wrongdoing, that the claim that he had gotten a prosecutor fired to protect his son was a "debunked conspiracy theory."  When you asked who cleared Biden, you got no answer except the news media themselves.

Bloomberg Retracts Hit Job Article Falsely Claiming Antisemitism From Trump Labor Aide.  One month after Bloomberg Law published a story with false allegations of antisemitism from a Trump appointee at the Department of Labor, the outlet has officially retracted the article.  "In reporting on a series of social media posts from Department of Labor official Leif Olson, we failed to meet our editorial standards for fairness and accuracy," Bloomberg said in a statement announcing its decision where the article would otherwise be posted.  "We regret that lapse and apologize to our readers and to Mr. Olson."

Media Pretend China Isn't Communist.  China is communist.  They have a Central Committee, Politburo, and a General Secretary.  China is ruled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).  The word "Communist" is right there in the name.  And yet, the mainstream media isn't so sure.  They regularly downplay the ideological nature of the CCP.  They have even taken to advancing the idea that China isn't communist at all, but in fact, capitalist.

News Station Tries To Claim Chick-Fil-A Has The Slowest Drive-Thru Line And Immediately Gets Demolished By The Internet.  Chick-fil-A is so good at serving people quickly and efficiently that it's become a meme in and of itself.  People are willing to get into what could be considered overly long lines for their drive-thru that spill out into intersections — I've seen it with my own eyes — not just because the food is good, but because they know that no matter the length of the line, they'll be in and out fairly quickly.  However, WWBT-TV in Richmond, Virginia, posted the results of a study that measured drive-thru wait times, and their conclusion was that Chick-fil-A was the slowest of them all. [...] The study is pretty misleading with its claim.  While it may take longer to get your food from a Chick-fil-A, the line is moving the absolute fastest.  The only difference is that more people are at Chick-fil-A.

More about Chick-Fil-A.

Reported disaster events
Our World In Fake Data.  It took me about thirty seconds to research the accuracy of the graph.  The Red Cross described 1927 as the worst year in history, reporting 111 disasters — including 29 tornadoes, 24 floods, 9 hurricanes and 23 fires.  The worst floods in US history occurred that year. [...] Obviously the person who generated the graph didn't do any research, and is simply making numbers up.  Another graph from the same website shows death rates from natural disasters down 95% since the 1920s.


Climate related deaths
One Climate Chart to Rule Them All.  You would think that 50 years of failed climate predictions might have eroded their haughtiness somewhat.  But you'd be wrong.


Media Corruption On Perfect Display In One Washington Post Paragraph.  Every single assertion of this paragraph isn't just wrong, but the opposite of right.  In each sentence, Trump is being blamed for things his political opponents have done.

Yup, Looks Like That Big Anti-Trump, Whistleblower Story Was All Smoke And Mirrors.  The media has spent the past few days speculating all the ways in which the Trump presidency could end after a whistleblower lodged a complaint regarding President Donald Trump's communications with an unknown foreign leader.  It turns out the complaint is nothing more than a rumor reported by someone in the intelligence community.  Buried in a lengthy CNN article about the complaint is the following paragraph:  ["]The whistleblower didn't have direct knowledge of the communications, an official briefed on the matter told CNN. Instead, the whistleblower's concerns came in part from learning information that was not obtained during the course of their work, and those details have played a role in the administration's determination that the complaint didn't fit the reporting requirements under the intelligence whistleblower law, the official said.["]

Brett Kavanaugh Breaks the Democrats.  Rarely does a story implode as spectacularly as the New York Times' latest effort to resurrect the claim that Justice Brett Kavanaugh was a teenage sexual predator.  By now, you know the facts:  The Times published an excerpt from a forthcoming book alleging that another woman suffered the same form of abuse and objectification from Kavanaugh that was alleged by another accuser, Deborah Ramirez.  No sooner had the universe of liberal political observers and politicians worked themselves up into a frenzy than the story fell apart.  The woman whose uncorroborated experience supposedly substantiated Ramirez's uncorroborated assertions wasn't even the one making these accusations.  Rather, they came from a Washington D.C. attorney with conflicts of interest who did not contact the Senate Judiciary Committee during Kavanaugh's confirmation proceedings.  What's more, she doesn't even remember the experience that was supposedly so traumatizing — a revelation that was inexplicably omitted from the Times' original draft.

Air Force plan to refuel near Trump's Scottish resort approved under Obama, reports show.  Last week some in the American mainstream media ran reports suggesting that the U.S. Air Force's decision to refuel some of its planes at an airport located near the Trump Turnberry, a Scottish luxury resort that's owned by President Donald Trump, was rooted in corruption.  These same media outlets also took aim at a U.S. Air Force squadron that stayed overnight at the resort itself during a stopover in Scotland last March.  The reports were based on a dubious investigation by House Democrats.

The Trayvon Martin Hoax Comes Crashing Down.  With a mediocre economy, growing questions about the efficacy of Obamacare, and a lethargic base waking up from a hope hangover to find that the president had left them hanging on the change part, the media knew that President Obama couldn't win on his record.  The media would need a controversy to galvanize the base and shame moderates into reelecting President Obama.  And so, when an unarmed black teenager was shot and killed by a man claiming self-defense, the media pounced.  They routinely used a years-old photo of Martin as a smiling young child.  Zimmerman was depicted with a mugshot.  The message was clear:  Martin was just a young child wearing a hoodie and eating Skittles while Zimmerman was a deranged menace.

The Intelligence Community Works for the President.  It's simply hard to know where to begin to respond to the staggering chutzpah of Jennifer Rubin's recent Washington Post opinion column accusing the president of undermining our intelligence community.  Rubin used the recent leak regarding the exfiltration (a fancy word for "removal") of an undercover "asset" in Russia as a hook to make the case that the president is somehow responsible for outing this source and therefore harming U.S. interests.  Her column is an example of the backward view elite leftists have towards democracy and the Constitution.  These elites, in desperate need of a remedial civics class, have convinced themselves that our elected president must learn to take orders from the intelligence community.

U.S. poverty falls to lowest level since 2007 and media's response is downright comical.  Did you hear that the poverty level fell below where it was prior to the economic collapse twelve years ago?  Probably not, because legacy media doesn't want you to hear about that.  They don't want you to realize the economy is in better shape than it's been in decades. [...] They don't want you to know this because if you realize you're doing better, you're more likely to acknowledge much of this is due to President Trump's first term in the White House.

An even mixture of sensationalism, dishonesty, and incompetence:
CNN's big 'mistakes' all run in one direction: anti-Trump.  CNN blared an "exclusive" headline Monday [9/9/2019] with a story purporting that US intelligence made the decision to "extract" a spy that it had working within the Russian government because officials believed his cover may have been compromised by President Trump having "repeatedly mishandled classified intelligence."  That dispatch from Jim Sciutto, CNN's "chief national security correspondent," would have certainly been a smash if it weren't for vehement denials by the administration and subsequent reporting that contradicted the crux of the story — that it had been Trump who screwed up the intelligence operation.  During a White House press briefing on Tuesday, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo called CNN's reporting "materially inaccurate."

The Sketchy Russian Spy Exfiltration Story.  First, the tenuous reporting from CNN, where they attempt to paint Donald Trump into the spy narrative, is transparently political opportunism by narrative engineer Jim Sciutto and the anti-Trump brigade.  You know Sciutto's efforts are bad when even the Washington Post and New York Times undercut the CNN script.  The exfiltration had nothing to do with President-elect Trump, or President Trump.  The part where the story becomes interesting is:  (A) the timing; and (B) that DC journalists know who the "spy" is.  Indeed the claimed "spy" and his family have been living under his real name in Washington DC.  This fact doesn't fit the outline of a retracted spy living in an era of imminent danger.

It's Official: The Democrats Just Want You Dead.  Americans are normalizing violence in their politics, but not in the way the media and the "experts" would have you believe.  No, "white supremacists" are not the greatest threat to your safety, despite what Don Lemon and his cohorts in the Fake News Industrial Complex say.  In fact, of 250 shootings in America wherein four or more people were shot (which is the official definition of a "mass" shooting), not one of the perpetrators was a conservative, let alone a "white nationalist."  But that hasn't stopped the Democrats.

Hurricane Dorian Can't Save CNN, MSNBC from Losing over Fifth of [their] Audience.  CNN lost 21 percent of its already minuscule audience last week, MSNBC lost 24 percent, while Fox News grew its already enormous viewership by six percent, as TVNewser highlights.  Yep, even the massively over-hyped news about a mass shooting and a regional weather story — Hurricane Dorian — could not stop the bleeding at both of these far-left, Russia Collusion Hoax channels.

Labor Official Who Resigned Over Bloomberg Reporter's Smear is Reinstated.  A senior policy adviser at the Department of Labor who was forced to resign last week after a Bloomberg Law reporter smeared him, was reinstated Wednesday night, the Daily Caller's Luke Rosiak reported in an exclusive.  According to a senior Labor Department official, Acting Secretary Patrick Pizzella "personally made this decision after carefully reviewing all the facts and circumstances." The official added, "he concluded that a correction is much better than an injustice."

Department Of Labor Reinstates Leif Olson After Bloomberg's Libelous Attack On Him Blows Up In Their Faces.  Yesterday [9/3/2019], a vicious and dishonest reporter working for Bloomberg named Ben Penn ran a vicious and dishonest story smearing labor attorney Leif Olson, a recent hire by the Trump Department of Labor, as an anti-Semite based on some Facebook commentary on Paul Ryan's electoral curb-stomping of what appeared to be an actual anti-Semite (though, in fairness, not sufficiently so as to stand out at a meeting of the House Democrat caucus), Paul Nehlen.  Any sane reading of the commentary would have identified it a facetious and making Nehlen the butt of a joke.  But Penn and his editors pushed out the story branding Olson as an anti-Semite.  Instead of doing the right thing, a gutless Department of Labor asked for Olson's resignation.

Bloomberg News Yet Again Screws Up Major Story and Doubles Down on Stupid.  President Trump often characterizes the media as the enemy of the people.  It is really hard to say he is wrong in the case of Bloomberg.  It has gotten multiple major stories demonstrably, harmed the reputations of American companies, cost a man his job, and stands by its demonstrably wrong reporting.  Bloomberg is harming other news outlets with its behavior.

The myth of ecocide.  It is hard to think of any other global event this year that has been as awash with misinformation as the rainforest fires.  We've been told these fires are a calamity, an act of 'ecocide'; they're proof of humanity's contempt for the environment; they will blacken and possibly even destroy 'the lungs of the world', as the rainforests are referred to, given they produce 20 percent of the world's oxygen.  It's all untrue.

Drudge tries to spook Trump voters again.  Another Friday and another hamfisted attempt by the Drudge Report to undermine support for President Donald John Trump.  A week ago, Matt Drudge was sure that the trade war with Red China was going to do The Donald in because the Dow Jones Industrial Average was down.  A week before that Drudge had us in a recession not caused by Red China.  Drudge has linked and bannered stories about wars with Iran, North Korea and Syria, which never materialized.

It becomes clearer every day that most journalists would rather have Democrats in power than a good economy.  Like everything else, whether it is fictitious Russian collusion, claiming Trump is mentally incompetent, claiming everyone hates us overseas, and playing the race card, the media is essentially campaigning for Democrats instead of doing their job of reporting the truth.  The strategy appears to be working somewhat because, despite record job openings, wages rising faster than any time while Obama was in office, and record low unemployment, especially for minorities and the less-educated, tax cuts that benefitted almost everyone, stock markets near record highs, many people have been indoctrinated to believe the economy is collapsing.

In the last 2 weeks alone.  CNN had one host threaten to throw a guy down the stairs, the other was accused of sexual assault, & a third's bodyguard assaulted a reporter.  Another host had a shrink claim (unchallenged) that Trump murdered millions more than Hitler, Stalin & Mao.  Meanwhile CNN hired one of the key architects of the coup against Trump just as we learned, as if by some weird coincidence, that there is a completely separate IG report into the misdeeds of the CNN new hires ex-boss. [...] MSNBC joined in the collective braying at the blood moon of Trump-Russia collusion by having their designated hammering hallucinator claim he also heard there were Russians in Trump's bank account.

The media refuses to face the fact that Joe Biden isn't close to collapsing.  Dear Fellow Members of the Media:  We need to talk about the way you're covering the Democratic race for president.  Consider this an intervention.  You all went crazy on Monday [8/26/2019] when a single poll showed a national tie between Joe Biden, Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders.  It was like a ticker-tape parade through the Canyon of Heroes; articles suggesting a historic shakeup in the Democratic race rained down upon America like ticker tape.  Huzzah!  We have a whole new race!

Throwing Punches for the Children — If This is Your Mantra, Zip It About Trump.  Trump is just a callous and unfiltered version of the "sophisticated" slander the left has been lobbing against the right for years through a corrupt and complicit mainstream media.  For proof of that, we could start scrolling through the endless accusations of the last few decades:  centrist John McCain was called a racist, the affable George W. Bush was tagged a bigoted war criminal, mild-mannered Mitt Romney was labeled a tax cheat, felon and murderer.  And this wasn't done by fringe activists — these were libelous claims published by mainstream media organizations coordinating with their ideological allies in the Democrat Party.

Recession?  Headlines in Search of a Story.  On August 19, the Washington Post's first sentence summed up their one-dimensional angle on the National Association for Business Economics' August survey:  "Most economists believe the United States will tip into recession by 2021, a new survey shows, despite White House insistence the economy is sound."  So it went, with most establishment news outlets bent on finding the gray cloud around today's current sterling economy.  Negative news sells.  Perhaps it has always been thus, though it certainly seems most prevalent when it is adverse to this administration.

The Democrat Party Is A Joke That Would Cease To Exist Without The Media's Support.  On literally every issue, the Democrats are social psychopaths whose goals are so far out-of-touch with reality that they have to lie in order to pitch them.  There isn't a single thing the Democrats want and/or fight for that they're honest about.  Every single issue gets packaged in a hilarious euphemism that's designed to help make their goals more palatable, because their ultimate objectives are so totally insane that nobody would ever in a million years be okay with them.  And that's where the media comes in.  The media's job is to be a marketing arm for the Democrats.

Stunning Day of Economic Gaslighting — Despite All Positive Data, Corporate Media Cheering For Recession.  The long-term borrowing rate for return on investment dropped momentarily lower than the short-term borrowing rate of return on investment because massive numbers of foreign investors were rushing to buy long-term U.S. bonds.  Wait... what?  Yes, a 'negative yield curve' is what happens when everyone wants to buy bonds in your long-term economy.

Delingpole: Every Story You Read About the Environment Is #FakeNews.  [Scroll down]  In the face of such overwhelming 'evidence', what possible reason could any casual reader have not to believe that world is indeed in the midst of an unprecedented environmental crisis wherein critically endangered species are being wiped out by callous, out-of-control, unregulated hunters, where extreme weather is endangering homes and lives, where not even the formal gardens in Britain's world-renowned stately homes are safe?  This, my friends, is why we are in such trouble.  Every one of those stories is a lie.  Almost every word of every one of those stories is a lie.  But how many of the people who read those stories would be aware of this?

If Deplatforming Hoaxsters Is OK, the News Media Should Be in Big Trouble.  MSNBC's Katy Tur reported on May 2 that, "Facebook has banned a number of conspiracy theorists" then wondered aloud why it had taken the tech company so long to do it. [...] Now, that kind of chutzpah requires a heavy dose of magical thinking laced with a stunning lack of self-awareness and doused with a toxic level of hypocrisy.  And it would be amusing if it wasn't so enraging.  Because these reporters hail from the very same news organizations that have intentionally misled the American public about three destructive hoaxes in the past year alone:  The Trump-Russian election collusion ruse; the Brett Kavanaugh rape allegations; and the Covington Catholic High School "smirking" myth.  CNN, the New York Times, the Washington Post and NBC News used every ounce of their considerable influence and reach, including social media, to promote each fraud for one collective purpose:  To destroy the presidency of Donald Trump and defame anyone associated with the president including pro-life teenagers.

White supremacy paranoia is a massive HOAX perpetrated by the toxic media that pushes hatred, bigotry and lawlessness.  Though the Left has been seething with animosity over what it perceives as America's 'white-dominated' society for years, in the lead-up to the 2020 election they have come out and made hating white people an official platform of the Democratic Party.  And shame on the party's officials and leaders for allowing it to happen.  In particular, the hatred is manifested in the establishment media-created and driven lie that a) "white supremacy" and "white nationalism" are one in the same; b) both are a major problem; and c) white supremacists are everywhere (especially at rallies held by POTUS Donald Trump).  It's all a fabrication, mind you.  The fact is we probably couldn't fill a college football stadium with the number of actual, avowed "white supremacists" in America, and in a nation of nearly 330 million people that's saying something.

Blame the media for racist violence, not Trump.  The leftist playbook is simple:  the mainstream media create false Trump narratives, and they repeat them far and wide until the false narrative becomes an accepted "truth."  The current narrative is that Trump is a racist.  The significance of the racism charge is not lost on these connivers, because racism is second in its universal disrepute only to pedophilia.  Now they are capitalizing on it when real racists commit heinous acts of violence as they pin them on Trump as if he is responsible.  Here is the problem, though:  we have yet to see any evidence, even flimsy evidence, that this president really is a racist.

Tucker Carlson: 'Conspiracy Theory' of White Supremacist Threat is the New 'Russia Hoax'.  As conservatives to line up and capitulate by supporting gun control, tech censorship, and other unconstitutional policies in the wake of this past weekend's mass shootings, Fox News host Tucker Carlson is one of the few commentators with the courage to say the truth.  With media-fueled hysteria over white supremacists reaching a fever pitch in recent days, Carlson addressed the growing concern on his show, calling it a "conspiracy theory" on par with the "Russia hoax."

It's not just Trump being blamed, competing networks use shootings to suggest silencing Fox News.  As much as the left ignores that the Dayton, Ohio, shooter was a self-described "leftist" who favored Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., for president, they work even harder to call attention to the El Paso, Texas, shooter's anti-immigration manifesto in an effort to pin that shooting on President Donald Trump.  While Warren gets a pass in the media for the Dayton shooting, there are reports the El Paso gunman was also an environmental extremist who embraced Eco-Fascism.  Having commandeered language in America, the liberal media deems words used to describe the flood of humanity overwhelming our border, words like "invasion," to be racist.

FBI Says The Media Wrongly Labeled Gilroy Shooter A "White Supremacist".  As we've learned in the past week, the political ideologies of mass shooters are deeply important unless they are on the far left.  Then it's irrelevant and it's journalistic malpractice to even report on it.  That's the contrast that's been drawn between the shooting in El Paso and the one that took place in Dayton, OH early the next morning.  I've been assured on social media that the difference is that the El Paso shooter left a manifesto (which has still not been technically confirmed) and that the Dayton shooter didn't.  Therefore, I'm told, it's completely out of bounds to draw any speculation from the latter's calls to violence against "fascists," his repeating of Antifa rhetoric, or his support for socialism.

If Anyone Is Spreading White Supremacy, It's The Media, Not Trump.  I knew the moment that I heard about the El Paso shooter's manifesto on Saturday that this shooting would become about President Donald Trump's supposed racism.  In fact, at the time of this writing, #WhiteSupremacistInChief is trending on Twitter.  But despite continuous claims and talking points circling around Trump's hatred of minorities, no one can ever point to something that Trump said that was actually racist.  When they do mention something that he said, they can never quote him verbatim, just one or two words.  "He called immigrants animals," they tell me along with other famous claims like calling immigrants "rapists" and "criminals."  Did Trump say those things?  Yes, but the context is so out of sync with the stories that are pushed about him.

MSNBC and CNN Claim Trump Was Never at Ground Zero after 9/11 Attacks; Videos Prove Otherwise.  On Monday [7/29/2019], when President Trump signed the 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund extension, he told a story of being at Ground Zero after the 9/11 terror attacks, that immediately got unhinged liberals coming out of the woodwork to claim he was lying.  Kyle Griffin, a producer at MSNBC, actually claimed there was no evidence Trump was ever at Ground Zero after 9/11: [...] CNN's Chris Cillizza also strongly implied Trump was lying: [...] Others in the media quickly piled on, challenging Trump's claim.

Fact-Check: NYC 9/11 Top Cop Confirms Trump Was 'Constantly' at Ground Zero.  After the Islamic terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, President Donald Trump was "constantly" at Ground Zero "motivating" and "inspiring" first responders during their rescue efforts, confirmed Bernie Kerik — who served as New York City's police commissioner at the time — in a Tuesday [7/30/2019] interview [...] News media outlets such as CNN and Vox characterized Trump as mendacious following Trump's recollection of 9/11 and its aftermath during public remarks on Monday [7/29/2019] regarding his signing into law an extension of the 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund.

Donald Trump Didn't Lie About Where He Was after the 9/11 Attacks, But Hillary Clinton Did.  The liberal media has egg on their faces for claiming that Trump lied about being down at Ground Zero after the 9/11 attacks.  Despite video evidence that has been floating around on the internet for years, they just couldn't help themselves.  It's curious, however, that the candidate that they all wanted to win in 2016, Hillary Clinton, actually did lie about where she was on 9/11 in order to insert herself into it.

FNC's Wallace:  Trump Is Calling People of Color 'Vermin' — 'It Sounds Subhuman'.  On this weekend's broadcast of "Fox News Sunday," anchor Chris Wallace questioned White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney on President Donald Trump's attacks on Rep Elijah Cummings (D-MD) and the city of Baltimore.  Wallace said, "This goes back to what happens with the four members of 'The Squad.' Nobody objects to the president defending his border policy, but this seems to be the worst kind of racial stereotyping."

The Degrees of Fake News.  [Scroll down]  What an eye-opener that press conference was!  Sitting among the Washington press corps before the Contras arrived, I felt like I was witnessing a gang of thugs plot an ambush.  There was no pretense of impartiality.  Many of the reporters there were openly enamored of Nicaragua's Marxist ruler Daniel Ortega — he of the cool mustache and designer eyeglasses — whose major "achievement" had been to redistribute wealth from friends of Somoza to friends of Ortega, even as Nicaragua's economy languished.  Ortega's media allies didn't even bother paying attention to what the Contra leaders said during the press conference.  The reporters were too busy chomping at the bit, waiting to trash the Contras and to bash President Ronald Reagan for supporting the Contras' anti-communist insurgency.  The reporters had an agenda.  Objectivity and truth-telling were no part of it.  They were rude and blatantly scornful toward the Contras.  They couldn't wait to file their stories painting Nicaragua's anti-communist resistance in the most unflattering light.  It was sickening.  It wasn't just unprofessional; it was journalistic malpractice.

Democrats woke and broke.  Fox News reported, "The Republican National Committee raised more than twice as much as the Democratic National Committee in June — $20.7 million compared to the DNC's $8.5 million, according to Federal Election Commission filings, Politico reported."  The story also said, "The RNC currently has $43.5 million, more than double the cash on hand as the DNC's $9.3 million."  More than double?  It is nearly five times as much cash on hand.

New York Times Fudged Book Sales Data To Torpedo 'Justice on Trial' Best-Seller Ranking.  The New York Times fudged book sales data in order to deny top-five billing to the best-selling "Justice on Trial," the definitive and deeply reported account of the nomination and confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, which was written by Carrie Severino and Mollie Hemingway, a Senior Editor for The Federalist.  Industry sales figures show that the New York Times ignored actual data on nationwide sales in order to depress the rankings not just for the Hemingway/Severino book, but also Mark Levin's latest book on the corruption of modern journalism.  According to Publisher's Weekly, the only public source of point-of-sale data on book sales, "Justice on Trial," was the top-selling non-fiction book published over the last week.

Immigration:  The Path To Power.  MIT says our illegal immigrant population is about 22 million.  Yale says it is between 16 and 30 million.  The 11 million figure so popular in the media is ridiculous and a total lie.

With The Media's Trickery, You Have To Watch The Other Hand.  An explanation for this week's media furor:  Distraction, diversion, and misdirection.

Lack of Bigotry in America Forces Media to Invent 'The Hoaxtroversy'.  If racism in America was anywhere as serious as the fake news media claims, would they have had to fabricate all these massive lies over the past few years?  The media told us the Hispanic George Zimmerman was white.  They hoaxed us with the KKKids from KKKovington High School, "Hands Up, Don't Shoot," and Duke lacrosse.  Each one of those phony hysterias blew up in the media's lying face, so now they have changed tactics.  Rather than invent massive national hoaxes to smear America and Americans as small-minded bigots, they have turned to the "Hoaxtroversy," they have begun to fabricate meme-like controversies, and still they are forced to lie.

GOP Candidate Gets Ridiculed For Deciding His Reputation And Livelihood Are More Important Than Building Some SJW's Self Esteem.  Mike Pence made quite a splash shortly after assuming office when it was revealed, via a Washington Post profile of Karen Pence, that he had a policy of not being alone or socializing outside of work with female staff.  In 2002, Mike Pence told the Hill that he never eats alone with a woman other than his wife and that he won't attend events featuring alcohol without her by his side, either.  This, as mamy recognized, is simply good common sense that had been called the "Billy Graham Rule," having its genesis in the "Modesto Manifesto" that governed the actions of pastors affiliated with Graham's evangelical movement.

Mississippi politician tells female reporter she can't interview him unless she's with a man.  A Republican candidate for Mississippi governor told a female reporter that he couldn't be interviewed by her unless she was accompanied by a male colleague — later claiming that he was following "the Billy Graham Rule."  "We just wanted to keep things professional," said GOP hopeful Robert Foster in a radio interview on Tuesday [7/8/2019].  The female reporter, Larrison Campbell of Mississippi Today, had been asking to go on a "ride along" with Foster when his campaign director reportedly refused on his behalf.

WATCH CNN Try To Shame Underdog Republican Candidate Who Wouldn't Grant Access To Female Reporter.  CNN's New Day John Berman tried to shame an underdog Republican candidate, Robert Foster because he wouldn't grant a Mississippi reporter access to him for an interview when they were alone.  Foster explained very eloquently why he felt the need to ask Mississippi Today reporter Larrison Campbell to bring someone along with her for the interview if they were going to have one.  Larrison made a massive deal about it, and the story wound up on CNN.  Larrison also embellished the story that she had been barred from Foster's campaign because she is a woman.  It turns out that Foster was smart in decision making if Campbell felt she had to grow this request into a scandal for the Republican candidate.

Media Magic — How a Democrat Pedophile Became a 'Trump Scandal'.  [Scroll down]  As stories go, a child sex case involving a Palm Beach billionaire was pretty big.  It was covered in the British press, in Florida media, at The New York Post, and at Fox News.  Bill O'Reilly led with the story on his Fox News show.  But CNN and MSNBC did not breathe a word about a Democratic prosecutor refusing to hold a Democratic child rapist accountable.

Corporate Media Push Trump-Jeffrey Epstein Conspiracy Theories Without Evidence.  The establishment media is attempting to link President Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein without any evidence connecting him to the underage sex trafficking case against the billionaire hedge fund manager.  Immediately following a Daily Beast report revealing Epstein's Saturday day arrest, a handful of news figures and outlets posted social media posts and stories painting a picture that the wealthy investor's arrest was bad news for President Trump — with one editor even going as far to suggest he could be directly implicated in the case.

Did someone mention Jeffrey Epstein?

Media Predictions of "Tiny Crowd" For Trump July 4 Speech Proven Spectacularly Wrong.  The media ran headlines right up to the day of President Trump's July 4 speech predicting only a "tiny crowd" would show up.  How spectacularly wrong they were. [...] In reality, photos from the event show crowds stretching the full length of the national mall.

8 Times The Media Said There Was No Crisis At The Southern Border.  Now that media-savvy congressional Democrats like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have brought attention to the humanitarian crisis on the U.S.-Mexico border caused by Congress's refusal to fix our exploited immigration laws, political pundits are having to eat their own words from just a few months ago claiming that the border crisis was manufactured by President Trump as a political stunt.  Last week, before President Trump departed for the G20 Summit in Japan, he told reporters on the White House lawn that his critics are now seeing he was right all along.

Tragic Photo Undermines Media Credibility on 'Manufactured Crisis' at Border.  Townhall put together a montage insisting not only that Trump had made up a "manufactured crisis" but outright lied that there was a crisis at the border in the first place.  The clip begins with CNN's Don Lemon asking:"This last ditch effort to persuade Americans that there is a crisis at the border - did it work?["] [...] In April, The Media Research Center's Bill D'Agostino put together a montage of media figures finally admitting that it was a crisis.  Over at Fox, Tucker Carlson put together his own montage of mainstream liberal media acolytes insisting as follows: [...] Doubtless there's more of this kind of utter wrong-headed frothing denial out there in the media.

Biden's Mythical Mass of Support.  Something very strange is going on with our news media, as it covers the state of the 2020 campaign.  Donald Trump, according to the big news outlets (CNN, the New York Times, ABC, the Washington Post, and their brethren), is on the ropes.  The polls from these same news outlets show him losing by catastrophic margins to virtually every Democratic candidate.  Even Senator Cory Booker (D-N.J.), who is polling at 2 percent among Democrats, would defeat Trump in every key state.  Joe Biden — according to the polls and the pundits — would crush Trump even in the reddest of the red states.  Forget the Midwest — Biden is so wildly popular, even Texas is now out of reach for the GOP.  Quinnipiac says Biden will squash Trump like a bug in Florida — 50 percent to 41 percent.  In fact, another Quinnipiac poll reports a tsunami of Bidenophilia is sweeping the nation from coast to coast.  "Joe Biden is ahead by landslide proportions," says Quinnipiac.

The Editor says...
The news media thrive on neck-and-neck horse races, where the lead changes every hour, depending on who's speaking.  An impending landslide doesn't compel you to tune in every day to learn the latest details.  Sensationalism sells advertising.

Trump: Smarter Than The Experts.  Remember the bold predictions made by the New York Times' economist and resident expert, Paul Krugman?  The Nobel Prize winning economist said that the economic fallout of a Donald Trump presidency would be severe and widespread, predicting that it could "plunge the world into recession."  He penned his view in an opinion piece published the day after the election.  Calling Trump both "ignorant and irresponsible," he said that his election would be the "mother of all adverse effects."  He warned that the new administration could quickly undo the progress that markets had made in the eight years since the financial crisis.  He was wrong.  The Trump economy continues setting records.  Employment, real wages, consumer confidence, all moving ever higher.  We wait in vain for a correction or apology from Krugman or the Times.  They rarely find room to share the good economic news with their shrinking readership.  The truth does indeed die in darkness.

New York Times Reporter Falsely Labels Segregationist Senators Republicans.  Appearing Thursday [6/20/2019] on CNN Newsroom, New York Times national political reporter Astead Herndon falsely labeled segregationist Democrat senators whom former Vice President Joe Biden praised for their "civility" Republicans.  The day prior, MSNBC host Kasie Hunt made the same error by misidentifying Sens. James Eastland (D-MS) and Herman Talmadge (D-GA). She has since issued a correction, while Herndon has yet to follow suit.

How Dangerous is Fake News?  Did you know that last week two hundred illegal immigrants originating from the Congo, that were picked up by border patrol agents, have tested positive for the deadly and highly contagious Ebola virus or that a company whistleblower announced that YouTube has been placing millions of subliminal anti-Trump messages in a variety of videos?  You most certainly did not.  But nearly every American has heard of President Donald Trump colluding with Russia and calling all Mexicans rapists or of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulting women even though these events never took place and were concocted out of thin air.

Turns Out The Reported Racist Delay Of Harriet Tubman's $20 Note Was Fake News.  A few weeks ago, it was announced that a new $20 bill graced by Harriet Tubman wouldn't be shown in 2020.  This set off a wave of condemnation and claims of racism backed by absolutely no evidence.  We are supposed to believe that Trump dislikes non-whites so much that he personally intervened in the situation and delayed the project. [...] Now, more details are coming out and as per usual, there's a lot more to the story and none of it involves Donald Trump at all.

Irish bar debunks fake news that Don Jr. and Eric Trump skipped out on bill.  Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, the eldest sons of the president, were targeted by fake news after a recent bar crawl where they picked up the tabs of their fellow patrons.  A Saturday [6/8/2019] story from The Daily Beast was published with the headline "Eric and Donald Trump Jr.  Still Have Not Paid Irish Bar Tab."  While leftists made the story go viral and immediately used the headline to trash the Trump family some more, the whole thing was complete and utter nonsense.  Reporter Arthur Schwartz almost immediately jumped at The Daily Beast and the authenticity of their story.

EPA Admin Rips Journalist For Misleading Tweet: 'Most Reporters Are Lazy'.  Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Andrew Wheeler ripped into a Yahoo News reporter in a Friday interview over a tweet he believed took remarks he made out of context.  Yahoo national correspondent Alexander Nazaryan tweeted Monday [6/3/2019] that Wheeler had said during a National Press Club event that "'The media does a disservice to the American public' by reporting on global warming." [...] But in the full quote in the article, Wheeler didn't actually say the press did a disservice by "reporting on global warming," full stop, but for not also reporting on the strides the country had made.  "The media does a disservice to the American public, and sound policymaking, by not informing the public of the progress this nation has made," he said.

NPR says babies aren't babies until they're born.  [Scroll down]  Doctors and nurses describe "how your baby grows and develops" during the first — and each subsequent — trimester for parents who are expecting.  They do not typically refer to "your fetus."  During ultrasounds nurses don't point to the screen and say, "Look at that thing there, your fetus is a boy!"  (Nor do they say, "I'm arbitrarily assigning the gender 'boy' to your fetus").

Pew: Fake News Tops Terrorism, Violent Crime, Climate Change as 'Very Big Problem in Country Today'.  "Made-up news/info" is considered a major problem by more adults in the U.S. than concerns like terrorism, violent crime, and climate change, results of a nationwide Pew Research Center study released Wednesday [6/5/2019] show.  Half (50%) of U.S. adults polled called fake news and information "a very big problem in the country today," compared to only 34% who cited terrorism:
  •   Made-up News/Info: 50%
  •   Violent Crime: 49%,
  •   Climate Change: 46%
  •   Racism: 40%
  •   Illegal Immigration: 38%
  •   Terrorism: 34%
  •   Sexism: 26%
About two-thirds of adults said that fake news and information has "a big impact" on Americans' confidence in government (68%) and creates "a great deal of confusion" about the basic facts of current events and issues.

Poll: Majority says mainstream media publishes fake news.  Nearly two-thirds of Americans say the mainstream press is full of fake news, a sentiment that is held by a majority of voters across the ideological spectrum.  According to data from the latest Harvard-Harris poll, which was provided exclusively to The Hill, 65 percent of voters believe there is a lot of fake news in the mainstream media.  That number includes 80 percent of Republicans, 60 percent of independents and 53 percent of Democrats.  Eighty-four percent of voters said it is hard to know what news to believe online.

Anti-Trump Traitors Rip Blindfold Off Lady Justice.  [President] Trump brought back jobs that Obama decreed were gone forever.  Black, Hispanic, and female unemployment are at historic lows.  Trump pulled us out of bad deals with foreign governments.  Thanks to Trump eliminating absurd regulations and oppressive taxes, businesses are coming home to America building factories.  The average American wage is $27 per hour.  Americans are enjoying an economic boom.  All this incredible good news is for the most part being hidden from Americans.  Instead, Democrats, fake news media, Hollywood, and social media flood the airwaves with their lie that Trump is horrible for America.

Trump-McCain Tarpgate: Yet Another Outrage That Wasn't.  By the time I learn enough about the latest current-events kerfuffle to realize I don't care, it turns out to be [nonsense] anyway.  And so it is with the outrage du jour:  Tarpgate. [...] Now, it's not exactly a secret that John McCain hated Trump's guts, and the feud has continued even after McCain's death.  Trump still badmouths a corpse, much to the delight of Trump's biggest fans.  So this story sounds plausible.  It sounds like something Trump would do, and something Trumpkins would defend.  But does that mean it actually happened?  Sure, it confirms my prejudices, but does that mean it's true?  It's starting to sound like maybe it isn't.

'Mainstream' media has a new fact-checking standard: 'Kinda plausible'.  [E]ven if you instill in your kids your conservative, pro-America, constitutional values, they are going be inundated with Left-wing pabulum, propaganda, and disinformation virtually every moment of their higher education experience.  Case in point:  One professor, Ian Bremmer, a geopolitical analyst, journalist, and cable news regular, actually attributed a 'quote' about North Korea to POTUS Donald Trump that was 100 percent made up, but posted on Twitter as though it was real — and then he actually defended his actions and his lie.

He Finally Admits He's Not a Reporter:  In New Book, Jim Acosta Insists 'Neutrality' Doesn't Work in the Age of Trump.  Jim Acosta is the worst "reporter" in the history of network news.  I say that not as a conservative, but as someone who believes in "news."  The title of Jim's upcoming book says it all:  Enemy of the People:  A Dangerous Time to Tell the Truth in America.  That reveals he has no understanding of what a reporter is.

Impeach or get off the pot, Democrats.  The same people who never met a constitutional amendment they didn't want to weaken or destroy will now act as if a middling procedural showdown is the next Watergate.  Mainstream media stories about Nadler's fishing expeditions have already framed Democrats as stewards of law and order, forced into impeachment by inflexible Republicans.

No Room for Honesty.  Listen to various abortion activists and Hollywood-faded stars and you might be under the impression that Georgia, Alabama and other states have just passed laws that could give women the death penalty for having abortions.  In fact, some news outlets have run stories that these states would arrest women for having abortions.  Sadly, at a time when the news media and progressive activists lament the President's dubious relationship with the truth, these are not just misstatements but outright lies.  Last week, Alabama passed a law that would prohibit abortion except for situations where the mother's own life is at risk.  News outlets faithfully reported that under this law, women could be jailed for having an abortion.

Dear Media:  Women Made the Alabama Abortion Law Happen.  Twenty-five white males are responsible for Alabama's new abortion legislation, according to the news media.  But, if Americans look more closely, they'll find that's a blatant miscalculation.  Women — pro-life women — are the driving force.  The "Alabama Human Life Protection Act," or HB 314, considers abortion and abortion attempts felony offenses, except in cases where it's done "to prevent a serious health risk to the unborn child's mother."  The law acknowledges that women are victims of abortion and "will not be held criminally culpable or civilly liable."  On Wednesday, HB 314, which was sponsored by a woman, was signed into law by another woman.  But rather than dwell on the oddity of pro-life women, the media blamed another group:  white men.

The credentialed media's creeping attempts to normalize 'transgenderism'.  It was not so long ago that the credentialed media referred to the person now going by the name Chelsea Elizabeth Manning as a 'transgender woman,' formerly known as Bradley Manning.  In an act of unbelievable stupidity, the government, under President Barack Obama, did not challenge Mr Manning's filing legally to change his name to Chelsea, though at least the government didn't attempt the idiocy of transferring him to a women's prison.  President Obama commuted the remainder of Mr Manning's prison sentence just before he left office.  Even in those stories of the past, the credentialed media chose to use the feminine pronouns to refer to Mr Manning, something with which I disagreed, and something which this site does not do.  But in the [Washington] Post's current article, Mr Manning's 'transgenderism' is never mentioned, nor that he was known as Bradley Manning when he committed his crimes.

Should Journalists Go to Jail for Spreading Russia Lies?  As a First Amendment maximalist, I am inclined to reply an automatic "no" to my own headline — should journalists go to jail for spreading Russia lies?  But a penalty of some kind, indeed a serious one, should certainly be levied for misinforming the public on the most important subject of our day, which has happened repeatedly over the last few years concerning the Russia probe.  And when these prevarications can be shown to have been deliberate, to have been done knowingly, difficult as that may be to prove, the line to sedition may have been crossed and there is an argument the reporters involved should face legal consequences.  They should also be fired.

McClinton
Man sentenced in burning of church painted with 'Vote Trump'.  A member of an African American church in Mississippi has been sentenced to 10 years in prison for burning the church, which was also spray painted with "Vote Trump" a week before the 2016 presidential election.

The Editor says...
That headline is misleading, because the AP left out several important details.  The whole thing was a fake hate crime.  He was a black criminal trying to cover his tracks.  It had nothing to do with voting for Trump.


Don't Believe the Headlines:  Mueller Said Barr Memo Was Accurate.  The internet is currently buzzing over allegations that Attorney General William Barr mischaracterized the Mueller report from none other than Robert Mueller himself. [...] These headlines all suggest some sinister attempt by Attorney General Barr to mislead the public about the Mueller report in his four-page memo on the report's findings.  But, when you actually read beyond the headlines you'll discover that the media is doing all the misleading here.

An 8-Year Media Lie About How the Syrian War Started is Finally Exposed.  The media insists on the right to fact check conservatives and erase them from social media, but fails at the most elementary fact checking when it comes to its own stories.

How Pseudo Events Are Used by Media to Manufacture Controversy.  The public was lied to for close to two years by legacy news outlets and public figures with claims there was "evidence" that the Trump administration colluded with Russia.  Contrary to their claims, the Mueller report showed there was no evidence that Trump colluded with Russia.  The report showed that all those rumors of evidence and all those claims of anonymous sources were lies.  What's important to remember is that for these outlets and public figures, facts don't matter.  What matters is how they can twist the facts to keep the public misled and distracted in order to keep their false narratives alive.

Media Caught Selectively Editing AGAIN — Record Your Interviews!  It seems that the media can't be trusted, they need to be watched.  And you can help us watch them.  If you've been witness to interviews with the media, deceptively editing your remarks we want to hear from you.

Thirdhand Hearsay Story Says Mueller Prosecutors Had the Goods on Trump to Charge Obstruction.  [Scroll down]  This violates almost every rule set out by Perry Bacon of FiveThirtyEight in "When To Trust A Story That Uses Unnamed Sources."  It is attributed to only two people, and even then, it is a third-party recollection of a conversation in which the reporter did not participate.  Given the sourcing, the quotes are virtually impossible to verify — another tipoff that a story probably is not true.  The third-hand sources are identified only as "former Mueller prosecutors," which means the story runs up against Bacon's recommendation that "specifics matter" when identifying anonymous sources.  Waas claims the Mueller team prosecutors "would have advocated" that Trump face federal criminal charges for obstruction.

BBC and Attenborough Accused of Fake News Misinformation on 'Climate Change:  The Facts'.  The Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) has made a formal complaint to the BBC about the series of gross inaccuracies in its recent documentary Climate Change:  The Facts.  As wags have quipped, the programme presented by Sir David Attenborough was so riddled with errors it really should have been called Climate:  Change The Facts.  Now the GWPF has written to the BBC Complaints department listing just a few of them.

American Ignorance.  Because I dig deeper than most people I can usually sort out the facts from the fake.  One thing I've learned over time is that the progressive left does not engage in truth nor does it traffic in honor.  The left wants to totally remake our laws, our society and our Constitution into something our founders never intended them to be. [...] Some citizens get news secondhand from friends, family or work associates.  They see headlines on social media and online service providers like AOL.  If they watch news at all they might tune into the local news or sometimes CNN.  Too many people will take what they hear as true.  They won't doubt it because after all it's being broadcast by national news organizations and those organizations certainly wouldn't report something that wasn't true, would they?

Trump Opponents Never Tire of Losing.  Meanwhile the media, having learned nothing from the ratings hit they absorbed due to their sloppy and often dishonest reports about the Russia hoax, are already parroting Democratic talking points on obstruction of justice.  That they're already carrying water for people like Jerrold Nadler and Adam Schiff suggests that they may well destroy what little public trust they still enjoy.  Journalist Glenn Greenwald, by no means a conservative, is stunned by the media reaction to Mueller's report:  "Pretending they got it right is just worsening the problem."

Netflix series challenged on claim that climate change causes cliff-diving walruses.  A new Netflix documentary series that features disturbing footage of walruses plunging off a cliff to their deaths — a phenomenon attributed by the filmmakers to climate change — has sparked a fact-check backlash by critics questioning whether the animals were actually fleeing polar bears or drones.  Leading the pushback is Canadian zoologist Susan Crockford, who said Netflix's "Our Planet" is misleading the public about the massive gathering of walruses on the rocky beach, known as a haulout, and the footage showing walruses falling from a steep ledge.  She blasted claims by series narrator David Attenborough during the episode as "contrived nonsense" and "Attenborough's tragedy porn."

Watch Former Fed Prosecutor Smash Anti-Trump Commentator's Biased Version Of "Truth".  What is going on within the far left media is appalling.  They are taking lies and calling them truths and taking truths and calling them lies and then taking honest public servants and calling them dishonest when their positions don't support the anti-Trump agenda.  America needs more people like [Joe] diGenova to stand up to this dangerous and deceptive hypocrisy that infects nearly every facet of the media today.

What's the Next Fake News?  It now transpires that the cheating and collusion was done by the FBI, working in cahoots with Hillary's campaign, and The New York Times and The Washington Post knew it but chose instead to write the very opposite, that it was the Russkies and Trump.  Mueller even told them so during the investigation, but they chose the big lie instead.  This should have been a death blow for the reputation of any newspaper, but if one watches zombie and sci-fi programs on television all day and night, as Americans tend to do, how on earth can they recognize fake news when they see it?  Everything Trump said or did these past two years sparked an avalanche of thunderous denunciations from both reporters and editorial writers.  Reporters wrote editorials and writers simply lied and presented theories as facts, and they continue to do so.

Media pulled off big con with Russia collusion story.  The whole thing was one giant lie.  And everybody peddling it — from House Democrat leaders, to Senate Democrats running for president, to the Senate Republican who reported the whole thing in the first place, to the roaring lions of the Great White Media — knew it was a lie. [...] Now that he is in the White House, President Trump has carried on delivering on issues that regular Americans actually care about.  But the press ignores all of those issues.  All they care about is the Russia collusion hoax.

Russian 'Collusion's' Greatest Hits.  From late 2015 until April 2019, the media, the Left, and the Obama administrative state hierarchy warned us nonstop that candidate, president-elect, and inaugurated President Trump "colluded" with Russia to defeat Hillary Clinton, to assemble a suspect cabinet, and to rule in treasonous fashion in the interests of Vladimir Putin.  The former head of the CIA and the director of national intelligence were birthed as permanent analysts at MSNBC and CNN to sermonize — with wink-and-nod assurances that their past billets and security clearances substantiated their authority — that the treasonous Trump would likely be impeached, indicted, or quit.  A mostly progressive team of lawyers, with an unlimited budget, no restrictions on time, and with enormous legal powers found all of that to be a lie.

Stolen Archives Show the True History of Russia Collusion.  [Scroll down]  How can anyone take these clowns in the media seriously?  One day, they are literally censoring one of the pre-eminent experts on Russia in the entire world, telling him he's insane to warn about collusion with Russia; the next, they want to put Trump in jail with no evidence.  Was Russiagate some sick Freudian projection?  Or even deflection?

AOC Isn't Even a Good Environmentalist.  Every Dem presidential candidate has endorsed the Green New Deal.  The media has covered what should be laughable notions like no automobiles, regulating diet and eliminating cows, with all the gravitas of innovations in heart surgery.  They cover it like it's a real thing and more, they paint anyone critical of the ideas as bigoted, closed minded, old-fashioned climate deniers and anti-science crazies.  Yes, that's an inversion of the truth, but that's how it's covered.

National Reckoning, My Eye.  The media has managed to impose a kind of groupthink that tells us that America is rife with racism and bigotry, but looking around and watching television, the only racism I seem to notice nowadays is the one against whites who go to church and raise law-abiding families.  Watch any Netflix or Amazon series and you'll see what I mean.  (Better not watch it, actually.)  The priest is always a pervert, the religious families are selling drugs on the sly, and all cops and soldiers are rapists, racists, and bigots.  All criminals are white, blond, and sporting Nazi tattoos.  Well, you know the rest.  Political correctness and diversity training have now become standard, and lockstep conformity is the order of the day.

Photographer of Starving Polar Bear Admits 'Climate Change' Image Was 'Misleading'.  A starving polar bear, rummaging for food in empty cans, in an ice-free landscape, with a caption that reads:  "This is what climate change looks like."  And she blames people for taking the iconic image 'literally'?  How else were people supposed to take this heart-wrenching but deceptive image?

National Geographic photog admits viral 'climate change' image of starving polar bear was misleading.  National Geographic contributing photographer and speaker Cristina Mittermeier acknowledged Thursday that her now-viral photographs of a starving polar bear went "too far" in linking the bear's condition to the effects of climate change.  In an article for National Geographic, Ms. Mittermeier wrote that she and photographer Paul Nicklen, who recorded video of the bear, were "on a mission to capture images that communicate the urgency of climate change"

More about polar bears.

Duplicity:
Mainstream media outlets change their tune on border crisis amid illegal immigration surge.  Months after repeatedly dismissing and mocking President Trump's claim of a national emergency at the Southern U.S. border, the mainstream media are grappling with reality, with no less than The New York Times declaring the border crisis at "breaking point."  Yet as recently as February, a New York Times fact-checker of Trump's State of the Union speech tweeted:  "President Trump described illegal border crossings as a 'urgent national crisis.'  This is false."

Nunes files $150M lawsuit against McClatchy, alleging conspiracy to derail Clinton, Russia probes.  House Intelligence Committee ranking member Devin Nunes filed a $150 million lawsuit in Virginia state court against The McClatchy Company and others on Monday [4/8/2019], alleging that one of the news agency's reporters conspired with a political operative to derail Nunes' oversight work into the Hillary Clinton campaign and Russian election interference.  The filing, obtained by Fox News, came a day after Nunes, R-Calif., revealed he would send eight criminal referrals to the Justice Department this week concerning purported surveillance abuses by federal authorities during the Russia probe, false statements to Congress and other matters.

Devin Nunes Files $150M Defamation Lawsuit Over 'Cocaine, Prostitutes' Story.  On Monday, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) filed a defamation lawsuit against The McClatchy Company, Liz Mair, and Mair Strategies, focusing on a May 2018 article that attempted to connect Nunes to allegations of a salacious event involving cocaine and prostitutes.  The article also cast aspersions on Nunes' investigation of alleged collusion between Donald Trump and Russia.  He is demanding $150 million and more.  "McClatchy succeeded in linking the cocaine/sex-fueled 'fundraiser' with 'prostitutes' to Nunes.  The defamatory meaning of the article was clearly understood by all who read and saw McClatchy's publication," the lawsuit reads.

Democrats and toxic media at their worst.  The left and its compliant media are willfully reporting false news to the American people.  Whether it is a symptom of mass hysteria that is the genesis for this confirmation bias-style reporting or an intentional maneuver to spread anti-Trump propaganda, its effect is toxic and pernicious.  The report comes in the form of a tweet making its way through the Twitter-sphere in which a user named Mark Elliott has posted a video of Donald Trump who he contends is referring to migrants at the border as "animals." [...] The president's words were clearly relating to the murderous gang MS-13 and not innocent migrants.  The exchange first became a controversy last year when House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi mischaracterized the remarks.

Vox Writer Praises Progressives for Misleading Americans on Tax CutsVox writer Matthew Yglesias praised progressive groups for misleading Americans about their taxes Monday [4/8/2019].  In a tweet, Yglesias praised the "messaging success" over President Donald Trump's Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.  The president signed the bill into law in December 2017.  At the time, then-Speaker of the House Paul Ryan (R., Wis.) said the bill would save families making $73,000 per year more than $2,000.  "[P]rogressive groups did a really good job of convincing people that Trump raised their taxes," Yglesias said.

Are Far-Right Extremist Crimes on the Rise?  No.  Despite the media coverage [...] far-right extremist crimes are not on the rise.  The number of crimes ascribed to the far-right has been holding steady since the 1970s. [...] Maybe the goal is to turn mainstream conservatives into "far-right" extremists?

Democrats and Media Fall For Old, Deceptively Edited Clip of Trump on MS-13.  Democrats and members of the establishment media fell for a viral clip purporting that President Donald Trump called asylum seekers "animals" on Friday at an immigration roundtable.  In reality, the clip in question is from an event in May 2018 when the president was clearly referring to members of the MS-13 gang as "animals."  At the time, CSPAN posted a deceptively edited clip that cut out someone else's remark about MS-13 that the president responded to, making it sound like Trump was talking about immigrants more generally.

Why do the least-bright people rise to the top?  For over two years, we have been tormented or delighted, depending on one's political preference, by the opinions and or declarations avowing President Trump's guilt with regard to collusion with Russia.  It was all a made-up scam from the beginning, but the media and the leftist loons have beaten this dead horse relentlessly in the fervid hope it would see Trump forced from the office he legitimately won.  Our horrific media who has long worked hand in glove with the Democrats, has spent hundreds of hours, over 500,000 columns, articles and op-eds asserting Trump's guilt.  It was all a hoax from the outset, fabricated within a few days of Hillary 's loss to Trump.  Most of those who got on board the Russia collusion hoax knew it was a lie from day one.  But they embraced the lie wholeheartedly.

Science: Teen Vogue Declares There Is No Such Thing As Biological Sex Because Reasons.  Teen Vogue has a long history of promoting transgenderism in harmful and objectively false ways.  That includes celebrating the child abuse of a 9-year-old boy whose parents allow him to believe he's a girl named Lactatia.  Ever the trailblazer, Teen Vogue put out a video proclaiming that there is no such thing as biological sex because nothing matters anymore.

Mueller the Boy Scout.  The media swore up and down that there had been "collusion" between the Trump campaigns and Russia to defeat Hillary Clinton and fail to put a Clinton on the throne of America.  Now, please bear in mind, that there never was any evidence of such collusion.  Plus, no one knew what it would look like if it had existed.  Would it be mountains of newsprint saying how great Trump was, coming from pro-Russian media here?  No such things ever were seen.  Could it have been some major peace move in Ukraine by Russia contingent upon Trump winning?  We never saw any sign of that either.  Could it have been an immense contribution from the Russian gold hoard to the Trump campaign?  No hint of that either.  So, then what was it?  Those of us raised to be skeptical of the media/leftist axis since the successful media coup against Richard Nixon in Watergate saw right through the whole thing.  Watergate was media hysteria over basically nothing.  So was the Trump/Russia collusion, as we saw it and heard it.

Media amplified Schiff's voice, shouted down the truth.  The whole point of the so-called "Fourth Estate" — that unofficial, quasi-fourth branch of government — is to mercilessly hound politicians from their comfortable lairs of mendacity.  Unless, apparently, those politicians are lying about Mr. Trump and spinning fairy tale yarns about prostitutes in Moscow hotel rooms, secret liaisons in Prague that never happened, and chance bar meetings in the Seychelles.  No one has been given more airtime and ink to spread his lies than Rep. Adam Schiff, California Democrat, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee and chief prevaricator.  That anyone this dishonest is allowed to hold a position of such importance and power in Congress tells you all you need to know about Washington these days.

Can the Media Ever Earn Back Our Trust?  After it was revealed on Sunday that the two-year investigation conducted by special prosecutor Robert Mueller found no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, the finger pointing began.  This time, the national media was under the microscope.  It's one thing to hear baldly partisan idiocy from the opposing political party and its candidates — we expect that.  It's another thing altogether when crazed accusations are being spewed by the press 24/7/365 as if they're fact.

Naming And Shaming : The Absolutely Worst Reporters on The Russian Collusion Conspiracy Theory.  Attorney General Bill Barr revealed this weekend that special counsel Robert Mueller did not find that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian government, dealing a hefty blow to a large swath of the media.  Perhaps most damaged were the individual anchors and reporters who bet their careers on proving that President Donald Trump conspired with a foreign power to steal an election.  These journalists authored fake stories, gave breathless coverage to the alleged scandal and ultimately misled the public.

BBC Ordered to Pay Damages for Fake News About Trump and Ukraine President.  The BBC was ordered to pay damages after the far-left outlet published fake news claiming Ukraine President Petro Poroshenko "authorized" an illegal payment of $400,000 to Michael Cohen for additional face time during a June 2017 meeting with President Trump.  "We apologize to Mr. Poroshenko for any distress caused and have agreed to pay him damages, legal costs and have participated in a joint statement in open court," the BBC's said in a written apology published Thursday [3/28/2019].

A Primer in "Ventriloquist Journalism".  Most "mainstream" journalists are not merely biased, but have a narrative story line in mind when they begin "reporting," so that when they call you on the phone, they aren't looking for actual information and perspective — they are looking for a specific quote to drop in their story that fits their narrative.  The point is:  when you deal with the media, it is not just their innate liberalism you need to be on guard for — you need to keep in mind that they already have their story written. [...] Stan Evans had a typically great label for this:  he called it "ventriloquist journalism."  Reporters have in mind a specific quote they'd like to have from you, and have developed great skill in teasing it out of people.  Think of it as just one aspect of fake news.

Rep. Brooks: 'Fake News Media...Perpetrated the Biggest Political Lie' in American History.  In remarks on the House floor about the Mueller report and the "fake news media" that spread unfounded claims for two-plus years about Russia-Trump campaign collusion, Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) said the accusations against Trump were "nothing but a Big Lie!" He also compared the liberal media to the National Socialist propaganda organs that operated in Nazi Germany, spreading half-truths and lies to demonize their political opponents.  "For more than two years, Socialist Democrats and their fake news media allies — CNN, MSNBC, the New York Times, Washington Post, and countless others — have perpetrated the biggest political lie, con, scam and fraud in American history," said Rep. Brooks on March 25.

What Price Maddow?  Right now, left-leaning mainstream media is getting flogged, and they deserve it for their dishonest reporting on the Trump/Russia conspiracy theory.  Mass firings and a month of apologies by Jeff Zucker and Rachel Maddow would not be sufficient to mend the harm these organizations have done to America's trust in news reporting.  But the folks who truly deserve to be put in their place and totally humiliated are the viewers of these pretend news shows.  At what point do the Wellesley and Williams-educated elites look in the mirror and accept the fact that they have been taken for fools?  They have enabled progressive media to manufacture rotten journalism.  They never turned the channel.

From Trayvon to RussiaGate:  No Media Reckoning, Only Denial and Tragedy.  [A] gander at the media's horror show of a rap sheet over the last five or so years helps to explain why denial is their only option at this point:
  •   Trayvon Martin Murdered By Racist White Man
  •   Michael Brown Yelled "Hands Up, Don't Shoot!" Before Racist Cop Murdered Him
  •   Brett Kavanaugh:  Serial Rapist
  •   Trump Ordered His Attorney to Lie
  •   The Racist White Boys from Covington High School
  •   Trump Can't Defeat Hillary
  •   Trump Is a Russian Manchurian Candidate

CNN Continues to Lie About Charlottesville in Attempt to Connect Donald Trump to New Zealand Attack.  As Breitbart News has explained repeatedly, and as CNN's own coverage at the time showed, Trump used the phrase "very fine people" to describe non-violent protesters on either side of the debate over a Confederate statue — and specifically excluded the neo-Nazis, whom he "condemned totally."  Yet for the past several weeks, CNN has reported that Trump was referring to neo-Nazis as "very fine people" in Charlottesville.  CNN is now using the Charlottesville lie to implicate Trump in the terror attacks against two mosques in New Zealand on Friday.

14 Media Outlets Spread Hoax About Trump Calling for Violence During Breitbart News Interview.  Outside of the usual-usual fake news to damage Trump and to distract from their failing Russia Collusion Hoax, the media's propaganda effort here is to make Trump pay a political price for daring to sit down with an alternative news outlet like Breitbart News and to warn other politicians not to violate the rules about who is "supposed" to be allowed to hold high-profile interviews.  In this particular case, because the president said nothing wrong in his interview with us, the media have been forced to invent something.

Media Magic:  How a Democrat Pedophile Became a 'Trump Scandal'.  As stories go, a child sex case involving a Palm Beach billionaire was pretty big.  It was covered in the British press, in Florida media, at The New York Post and at Fox News.  Bill O'Reilly led with the story on his Fox News show.  But CNN and MSNBC did not breathe a word about a Democratic prosecutor refusing to hold a Democratic child rapist accountable.  Epstein had given more than $145,000 to Democratic candidates and causes, including Bill Clinton, John Kerry, Hillary Clinton and Chuck Schumer.  He was a big Israel backer.  Bill Clinton and Democratic activist Ron Burkle were frequent guests on Epstein's private plane, dubbed the "Lolita Express." [...] But recently, the very news outlets that spiked any news about this case for the past 13 years are suddenly hot on the trail of Jeffrey Epstein.  Why the newfound sense of decency?  The answer is:  Because they found a Trump connection.

NYT Says Border at 'Breaking Point' 1 Month After 'Fact Check' Claimed No Emergency.  One month after claiming there is "no emergency" at the border, the far-left New York Times now concedes the border is at a "breaking point."  In real time, as President Trump gave his State of the Union speech last month, the Times branded the president a liar over his claim that there is an "urgent national crisis" at our border.

Newsrooms that rushed to report tax refunds were smaller this year go silent on IRS data showing refunds have increased.  Tax refunds are up from where they were this time last year by 1.3 percent following the fourth week of the 2019 filing season, according to new Internal Revenue Service data.  To be more specific, the average tax refund has increased to $3,143 from $3,103 last February, according to cumulative statistics comparing the 2018 and 2019 filing seasons.  Oddly enough, certain newsrooms have responded to this development with total silence.  I say "odd," because it was just a few weeks ago that these same newsrooms rushed to report that tax refunds were smaller this year, suggesting either implicitly or explicitly that the decrease was tied to the Republican Party's tax reform bill.

The Climate Scare:  Ever More Shrill, Ever Less Serious.  The Democrats have taken control of the House of Representatives!  And, for their first act, how about some scary "climate" hearings?  The New York Times, of course, takes the occasion to run a big front-page story with the headline (in the print edition — online is different) "2018 Continues Warming Trend, As 4th Hottest Year Since 1880."  Let's apply a little critical analysis.  The Times adorns their article with a huge temperature graph, covering the period 1880 to 2018, that goes across two-thirds of the top of the front page.  The overall trend looks up at first glance.  But on not-very-much-closer inspection, it is obvious that 2017 was down from 2016, and 2018 was down from 2017.  How exactly does that constitute 2018 "continu[ing the] warming trend"?  I would have said that the last two years in a row down is the opposite of "continuing the warming trend," but what do I know?

The Resistance is Everything They Accuse Trump of Being.  In classic KGB style, Obama's administration deployed our nation's intelligence agencies to infiltrate and spy on their political opponents. Using paid informants — believed to include, at minimum, Joseph Mifsud, Stefan Halper, Henry Greenberg and Felix Sader — the political appointees heading our FBI and CIA attempted to entrap Trump's campaign with monetary enticements and promises of Russian kompromat on Hillary Clinton. [...] While these outrages have gone on, our very own American Pravda — the Democrat's mouthpieces in the mainstream media — have published a steady stream of disinformation and propaganda designed to turn reality on its head and portray Trump as Vladimir Putin's puppet instead of the target of Soviet-inspired tactics employed by Obama's police state.

What's Worse Than Fake News?  Hypothetical news.  The other day all the major new outlets were covering a story about Elizabeth Warren saying on the campaign trail in Iowa that Donald Trump "might not even be a free person" but rather in jail at the time of the 2020 Presidential election.  Call this phenomenon the "hypothetical news."  Donald Trump might launch a preemptive nuclear attack on North Korea.  Donald Trump might withdraw from NATO.  Donald Trump might fire his Chief of Staff.  Donald Trump might be crazy.  More subtle examples of hypothetical news are:  there is "widespread concern on Wall Street" that Donald Trump might fire Fed Chairman Powell; or "White House sources say" that Donald Trump is considering firing Fed Chairman Powell.

A New Low in Media Lies from the Miami Herald.  It's commonplace and universal: if you're a dissident from the Leftist agenda, you're not going to get fair, accurate, or honest treatment from establishment media reporters.  But in this hit piece on Hallandale Beach Commissioner Anabelle Lima-Taub, who called Muslim Rep. Rashida Tlaib a "Hamas-loving anti-Semite" who might "become a martyr and blow up Capitol Hill," Sarah Blaskey of the Miami Herald hits a new low even for Leftist "journalists," whose integrity was already a notch below that of child molesters, and provides a textbook example of how those "journalists" distort the facts, libel people, and lie outright in order to manipulate the public into believing what they want them to believe.

100,000 Supporters Turn Out for Annual March for Life — USA Today Reports 'More Than a Thousand,' CNN and MSNBC Completly Ignore It.  An estimated 100,000 people — including Vice President Mike Pence — gathered in DC on Friday for the annual March for Life.  The media, as always, is either outright ignoring the massive march or severely downplaying the impressive size of the crowd.

The 'Trump Hid His Meetings with Putin' Stories Begin to Unravel.  On Sunday [1/13/2019], the mainstream media launched a new ploy to promote their Trump-Russia collusion narrative with a story that first appeared in the Washington Post titled "Officials in dark on Putin talks."  A similar piece was published in the Wall Street Journal on Monday, titled "Trump didn't use notetakers at Putin/ Meeting."  Cable-news networks and Democratic congressmen claim these stories indicate that President Trump held secret discussions with Russian president Putin that were revealed to no one.  For example, Senator Mark Warner (D-VA) told CNN on Sunday that the U.S. government "does not know" what Trump and Putin discussed.  It is now clear that these stories were misleading, if not mostly false.

The FBI Counterintelligence Operation into Donald Trump Did Not Start After Comey Firing.  Against the backdrop of a New York Times article attempting to justify the FBI opening a counterintelligence operation against Donald Trump the current narrative du-jour is to claim the investigation was considered as an outcome of the firing of James Comey in 2017.  This is factually false.  FBI Director James Comey outlined the specifics of when the counterintelligence operation began during his March 20, 2017 testimony.

Brandon Darby:  Propaganda About Border Mostly from Mainstream Media.  Many mainstream news outlets appear to be purposely and dishonestly overlooking key facts about the U.S.-Mexico border region in order to push a false narrative about a safe border.  Breitbart Border and Cartel Chronicles Director Brandon Darby took on the recent reporting by CNN's Jim Acosta and some social media postings by Texas Democrat Robert Francis "Beto" O'Rourke, where they try to claim the border is safe.

My Eye on 'Black Eye'.  The new Fox Nation subscription service posted the documentary Black Eye:  Dan Rather and the Birth of Fake News at 6:00 a.m. (Eastern) this morning [1/10/2019].  The documentary revisits the Rathergate scandal from its origin in the 2000 presidential campaign to the 2015 film Truth and slightly beyond.  I have now watched the documentary and want to offer a few notes with my impressions on it for what they may be worth. [...] I hope Power Line readers will view the documentary.  It memorializes an important piece of history that has already receded into the mists of the ancient past.

NYT Uses Tiny New Mexico Town to Claim There's No Border Crisis.  Somewhere along the United States' 2,000-mile border with Mexico is a town unconcerned by what President Donald Trump has called a border "crisis," and the New York Times is on it.  "On the Border, Little Enthusiasm for a Wall: 'We Have Other Problems That Need Fixing,'" the Times reported.  The source for this claim is not polling data, but rather interviews primarily with residents of the tiny town of Columbus, N.M.  Columbus is home to residents who see little issue with their proximity to the border.  The Times identified at least one citizen who seemed to wish there were more illegal immigration, not less.

When media are quiet about financial news, you know the economy's strong.  We were told the market was going down because of Trump's trade policies, because he was chewing out the Fed for raising rates too rapidly, and because of the government shutdown.  I am having trouble finding where the media and other Democrats are giving Trump credit for the market rising around 10% since December 24.  Why has the market reversed itself for now?  Here are a few hints:  sales during the Christmas season were up over 5%, over 300,000 jobs were created in December, and job gains were revised upward in both October and November.  Wages went up 3.2% year over year, the fastest growth in a long time, and gains are especially being helped on the lower end of the scale.  There continue to be more job openings than job-seekers.  It is obvious that a strong economy does not fit the Democrat agenda, so it is downplayed.

Why Fact Checking Is A Joke.  As soon as President Donald Trump's speech ended, the liberal talking points were spewing on the cable news networks disguised as "fact checking."  Armed with press releases from the Democratic National Committee, the talking heads universally focused on the small stuff to avoid admitting the inconvenient truths leftists avoid like the plague — illegal immigration hurts Americans.  Democrats don't care.  To leftists, individuals are disposable.  Why would they be bothered by a Ronil Singh if they don't care about the 100 million dead their totalitarian philosophy is responsible for?  One more body on the pile of bodies isn't going to bother people unbothered by the existence of the pile in the first place.  But political points had to be scored, the liberal narrative had to be advanced.  Enter the official "fact checkers."

Seattle TV Station Fires Staffer Who Doctored Trump Speech Video.  A Seattle television station fired a staffer for allegedly doctoring footage of President Trump's speech Tuesday evening — making it appear that that Trump's tongue was drooping out of his mouth and his skin color to be bright orange.  A side-by-side comparison of the speech that aired live on CNN Tuesday night [1/8/2019] versus what was broadcast later on FOX Q13 shows the video manipulation.  The differences were spotted by political observers, resulting in the station terminating the employee.

Trump tongue trick lands Seattle TV station Q13 FOX in hot water; editor fired.  A staffer at local Fox affiliate Q13 has been fired after the station aired what appears to be a doctored video of President Donald Trump's Tuesday night speech from the Oval Office.  The video was changed to make it look as if Trump was sticking his tongue out languidly between sentences.  In addition, the colors in the video look more saturated, leading the president's skin and hair to appear orange.

Seattle News Room Intentionally Manipulated Video of President Trump for Broadcast.  A statement from Fox affiliate Q13 in Seattle appears to confirm that a news video editor intentionally manipulated video feed from the public address of President Trump.  "In a statement, Q13 noted that the video editor responsible has been placed on leave pending an internal investigation."

The Only Privilege in America is Liberal Privilege.  Item:  Catherine Blasey Ford's cock-and-bull story about being assaulted by Brett Kavanaugh nearly half a century ago when they were both teenagers.  Do not try this tactic if you are a conservative woman attacking a liberal Supreme Court nominee.

Fake News Daily
Caught On Video:  Fake News Media Fabricating "Trump Border Crisis.".  We all know so much of what passes for "news" these days is little more than manufactured propaganda ejected daily from the bowels of the Establishment Media to splatter across the nation's television, computer, and phone screens, but it's always fun to catch them in the act and that's exactly what the following video does.  Watch as media photographers stage a scene of a little girl and her father attempting to climb over a supposed border fence.  [Video clip]


Media's '19th nervous breakdown,' as Trump fulfills another campaign promise.  How many times can the news media falsely and hysterically sound the apocalypse alarm?  Besides being 100 percent wrong on the election of Donald Trump in 2016, their fear-mongering predictions of doom and condemnation have been wrong on any number of other Trump policies, initiatives and personnel moves.  Those include last year's tax cuts, eliminating the ObamaCare individual mandate, North Korea, moving the U.S. Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem, the falsely named "Muslim travel ban," employment and manufacturing increases, Department of Veterans Affairs reform, NATO's financial accountability, two Supreme Court justices, and repudiation of the Iran nuclear "deal."

How Much of the Internet Is Fake?  Turns Out, a Lot of It, Actually.  In late November, the Justice Department unsealed indictments against eight people accused of fleecing advertisers of $36 million in two of the largest digital ad-fraud operations ever uncovered.  Digital advertisers tend to want two things:  people to look at their ads and "premium" websites — i.e., established and legitimate publications — on which to host them.  The two schemes at issue in the case, dubbed Methbot and 3ve by the security researchers who found them, faked both.

After Fake News Reports, Media Now Claim Trump's Christmas Visit to U.S. Troops Was Obvious.  On Wednesday morning [12/26/2018], media outlets were running the story that President Donald Trump had failed to visit U.S. troops at Christmastime.  By Wednesday afternoon, the media claimed Trump had made his visit to a war zone obvious in advance.  In between, media outlets that had earlier trumpeted Trump's supposed non-visit to the troops were spinning the news that he had, in fact, visited by noting that it was his first visit to a war zone since taking office.  Left-wing Salon.com, for example, reported initially that Trump had failed to visit the troops during Christmastime, then changed its story and headline, but retained the anti-Trump spin.

I thought fraud in reporting was done for.  I was wrong.  The [Jack] Kelley scandal, like the 2003 revelation of Jayson Blair's frauds at the New York Times, disproved my belief that Stephen Glass's fakes at the New Republic (in the 1990s, when I was the magazine's editor) might be the last.  Surely computer-aided fact-checking would deter fraud, I thought.  However, the unmasking of Der Spiegel's erstwhile ace, Claas Relotius, as a phony on Dec. 20, mere days after he collected his fourth German Reporter Prize, shows yet again that my hope was naive.  Reporters keep inventing stories and getting prizes for them.  What's going on?

Der Spiegel star reporter Claas Relotius fabricated stories for years.  The German weekly Der Spiegel, one of the top-selling publications in Europe, is reeling from a scandal that revealed that a star reporter has reportedly faked stories for years.  Many of the faked stories written by Claas Relotius were centered in the United States or in the Middle East.  So far, Der Spiegel editors said Wednesday, they had found that Relotius "made up stories and invented protagonists" in at least 14 of the 60 stories examined so far.  But they said the investigation is only beginning.  The editors said they were "astounded and sad" by the discovery, which they called "a low point in Der Spiegel's 70-year history."

Disgraced German journalist now suspected of charity scam.  An award-winning German magazine writer who resigned in disgrace for making up stories is suspected of embezzling cash he collected on behalf of children orphaned by the war in Syria, according to his former employer.  Der Spiegel said Sunday [12/23/2018] it had uncovered information that Claas Relotius allegedly solicited contributions after writing an article about Syrian urchins living on the streets of Turkey — but directed donations to his own bank account.

Fake News, Fake Rednecks.  Award-winning German alleged reporter Claas Relotius — he was named CNN's Journalist of the Year in 2014 — has just been unmasked as a rank fabulist after it was revealed that he fabricated large sections of at least 14 articles since 2011 — most significantly, a 2017 piece about Trump voters in rural Minnesota that turns out to have been a largely fact-free hit piece designed to appeal to the confirmation bias of media elites who regard rural white Americans as hateful, toothless retardates.  The article appeared in Der Spiegel — one of Europe's highest-circulation and most respected publications.  With a fact-checking staff of 70, this saga is being depicted as Europe's biggest media scandal since 1983's "Hitler Diaries" debacle.

Plausible Lies.  The case of Claas Relotius, Der Spiegel and the town of Fergus Falls, Minnesota has become notorious.  Der Spiegel, Europe's most widely-read news source, fired Relotius, one of Germany's most honored journalists, when it came to light that he had made up facts in a number of articles he wrote for the magazine.

Der Spiegel to run 23-page special on reporter who faked stories.  The German news weekly Der Spiegel is to publish a 23-page special report on how one of its award-winning reporters faked stories for years and dealt a blow to media credibility.  Claas Relotius, 33, resigned after admitting making up stories and inventing protagonists in more than a dozen articles in the magazine's print and online editions.  Since the scandal was revealed by the magazine on Wednesday, other mainstream German outlets including Die Welt and Die Zeit, which once used Relotius as a freelancer, have also begun poring through articles that he wrote for them.

Don't Let the Media Convince You the USA is Dangerous For Journalists.  The narrative began when Time magazine decided to dedicate its person of the year to "The Guardians," a group of reporters best known by member Jamal Khashoggi, a U.S. resident murdered by the Saudi Arabian government.  Other outlets picked up on Times' lead, as nonprofit Reporters Without Borders added the U.S. onto its list of countries most deadliest for journalists for the first time ever — joining Mexico and Syria.  Reuters decided to bury the true reason for why the U.S. had an inordinate amount of journalists die in 2018 in the eight paragraph of its Tuesday report: the tragic slaying of five employees at the Capital Gazette's offices in Annapolis, Maryland, in June.  Two were killed in weather-related incidents.

Time Magazine and the Manipulation and Abuse of Truth.  After taking note of the same thing Scott had observed — Time had literally called Obama Obi-Wan Kenobi, the heroic Jedi knight from Star Wars, while disdaining Trump as a demagogue leading a pack of racists and misogynists — I went on to take note of exactly when this kind of disconnect between Americans and media elites began to seriously surface.  I traced it back to the in-the-day famous speech of President Richard Nixon's number two, Vice President Spiro Agnew.  Agnew had ventured into the American heartland — Des Moines, Iowa — on November 13, 1969.

Electoral Fraud: the Real Record.  When Donald Trump was running for office, he raised the issue of fraudulent votes.  As with everything else Trump has said, it was instantly attacked and ridiculed by the media.  Since then, the idea has been dismissed by MSM journalists who have insisted that there have not been any cases of illegal voting.  Recently, though, the novel possibility of fraudulent votes in favor of a Republican candidate has made the MSM do a 180 while reiterating that such things have never happened favoring Democratic candidates.  As with many other topics, MSM journalists have blatantly lied.

Media Conventional Wisdom On The Russia Investigation Is Uninformed And Idiotic.  Jim VandeHei of Axios claimed to sum up on Sunday "what we already now know" about Robert Mueller's findings in the Russia probe.  His next claim was even more robust.  "What we already now know is highly damning and highly detailed."  If you want to — and I quote — "go deeper," you can click a button that gives you "460 words" of how what we know is highly damning and highly detailed.  It is, of course, not even close to either of those things.  But it's worth looking at to see how some D.C. figures are easily spun into thinking — or claiming to think — that things for which there is no evidence have "highly detailed" evidence.

Bush 41's death reveals the truth: the only kind of Republicans the media likes are dead ones.  Today we will hear most of the media talk about George H.W. Bush in a flattering manner, as they should.  They also acted as if they loved Reagan and McCain when they died — even as they sought to destroy them when they ran for office.  The playbook is always the same.  Democrats, including most of the media, pretend they love Republicans when they die after they trashed them when they ran and lived.

Pittsburgh - we need to talk.  Just because someone from ABC-TV, NBC-TV or CBS-TV sticks a microphone in your face, and asks your opinion about the Tree of Life murder, or how you feel about Trump, or the Pirates, or the Steelers, remember, this is still a free country.  You don't have to answer.  Most of the time, you will look silly.  You will make the news, and if this is what you want, beware, you will go on record as being a loudmouthed idiot.  Even if you speak carefully and intelligently, know that back in the editing room they can, and do, cut you to pieces, so whatever your message was, it is no more.

DHS Secretary Issues Statement, Correcting False Media Accounts at Southern U.S. Border.  [Scroll down]  [Quoting Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen] "Fifth, we cannot confirm the backgrounds and identities of all caravan members which possess a national security and public safety risk to our country.  However, at this point we have confirmed that there are over 600 convicted criminals traveling with the caravan flow.  This includes individuals known to law enforcement for assault, battery, drug crimes, burglary, rape, child abuse and more.  This is serious.  Additionally, Mexico has already arrested 100 caravan members for criminal violations in Mexico.["]

Avis Rental Car Returned With Ballots, Media Narrative Claims 'Suspicious Package'.  In what appears to be a massive cover up, a Democrat, Broward County employee returned a rental car to the Fort Lauderdale Airport with two boxes of provisional ballots in the trunk.  However, the media is not reporting that, but following a "suspicious package" narrative as the airport was shut down last night after the discovery.  Laura Loomer reported images of the boxes and the Avis employee who found them.  The highly leftist Broward County Sheriff's Office shut down a portion of the Fort Lauderdale airport after the boxes of ballots were reported.  They called it a "suspicious package" and brought in the bomb squad to "investigate," shutting down the airport for hours.  Literally every local news media outlet has parroted the line of the "suspicious package."  "Only a few conservative outlets even mentioned that the package was actually two boxes of provisional ballots from Broward County."

Democrats Freak: Obama Can't Fill Arena & Loses Control In Wild-Eyed Shrieking Rant.  Barack Obama was supposed to be the Democratic messiah, bringing on the big blue wave.  But, the Obama of 2008 and 2012 is gone, and the truth is, he can't fill arenas.  The former president was just caught on video with white hair, sunken eyes, and a shrill voice that often cracked and stuttered terribly while speaking.  Well, we just discovered what Barack and the Democrats are trying so hard to hide.  Something stinks when it comes to Democratic rallies.  In fact, there is something they can't deny.  Even their number one guy, Barack Obama, is having a [difficult] time filling up a venue.  Instead, the mainstream media has to take photos at certain vantage points to give the impression there are tens of thousands in attendance.

When Media Foist False Narratives to Sow Social Discord, They Indeed Are the Enemy of the People.  A maniacal dirtbag murdered eleven Jews in Pittsburgh.  In time, perhaps after a decade or two of ACLU appeals, he will be electrocuted, injected, hanged, or hopefully all three.  The dirtbag hated Jews, and he likewise hated President Trump.  President Trump responded to the news immediately with profoundly sensitive and healing words aimed at condemning anti-Semitism and at comforting and consoling the Jewish community. [...] And then came the sowers of social discord to destroy the moment.  The Left Media would not allow the President that moment to heal and unify.  Instantly, they brought in one Left-Democrat anti-Trump "analyst" after another to blame Mr. Trump for the attack.  They never blamed President Jimmy Carter's anti-Jewish rhetoric for the 1977 Brith Sholom Kneseth Israel synagogue shooting in St. Louis.  Nor Bill Clinton for the 1994 Brooklyn Bridge shootings of yeshiva students that included the murder of Ari Halberstam.  Nor Clinton's rhetoric for the 1999 Granada Hills Jewish Community Center shooting in Los Angeles.  Nor Obama for the deadly 2009 Holocaust Museum shooting in Washington, D.C.  Nor Obama for the 2014 Overland Park Jewish Community Center shootings in Kansas City that murdered three.  But this time — with the same social dynamics as the others — they tried blaming the President.  By sowing social discord with outright absolute falsehoods at a time that called for healing, the Left Media indeed were acting as enemy of the people.

Caravan migrants different, more violent, than previous migrant groups [according to the] U.S. military.  To hear the press and its narrative allies tell it, the Honduras migrant caravan is little more than thousands of mothers and toddlers spontaneously fleeing violence in their home countries.  The flight is little different from that seen in previous caravans.  Any concern about crime or violence is a "scare tactic," or "lying," or "racism," and there's no evidence any of the migrants are criminals.  President Trump's warnings about the matter are simply "factually wrong."  Actually, a different picture is emerging.  Specifically, signs are mounting that far from the exodus being a Madonna-and-child in flip flops narrative, the military-aged unemployed males dominating this wave of caravans are far more violent than reported.  That's not a scare story from some rightwing militia group, but the actual view of the U.S. military, whose 5,000-plus troops have been dispatched to meet the caravans and keep them from storming the U.S. border and entering the U.S. illegally as they already did in Mexico.  Asked if the dispatch was all a border stunt by a reporter, Secretary of Defense Gen. Jim Mattis icily replied:  "We don't do stunts in this department.  Thank you."

Obama Can't Fill High School Gym in Milwaukee — But Daily Beast Hack Claims Line Was Mile Long!  Former President Obama was in Milwaukee, Wisconsin Friday [10/26/2018] and he couldn't fill a high school gymnasium.  But this didn't stop a far left Daily Beast hack from claiming the line was a mile long to get into the event!  Never trust the liberal media.  Never!

Fact-Checkers Without Evidence.  As the media continues its precipitous decline in public approval and credibility, one small bastion still retains a semi-sacred status:  Fact-checkers.  Even more than "journalists" fact-checkers claim to be above the fray, depicting themselves as sticking to the "cold hard facts" while leaving their opinions at the door.  Of course, this is meant to cover up the fact that almost invariably they inject their opinions into various matters while projecting a false narrative that their work emanates from some higher authority that must be believed, much like a college professor who thinks he must not be questioned by mere students.

Christina Blasey Ford's Polygraph Was [Suspicious].  The fact that Christine Blasey Ford's lawyers refused to release the results of her polygraph exam until the day before her testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee last month caused some suspicion.  And when we finally got a look at them, a lot of Judge Kavanaugh's supporters were confirmed in their suspicions. [...] Even if Ford's exam had been entirely on the up and up, despite the credence most people give them, polygraph tests are something of a joke among serious research psychologists.  The American Psychological Association will tell anyone who cares to listen (which unfortunately isn't many) that "most psychologists and other scientists agree that there is little basis for [their] validity."  The APA has such a dim view of the procedure in part because, though research indicates that a polygraph exam can detect deception better than chance, there's still a significant likelihood of error.  And doing better than flipping a coin isn't all that great when someone's reputation is on the line.

Lawsuit may help explain remains of 63 fetuses found in Detroit funeral home.  When their daughter died 27 minutes after her birth in December 2014, a Detroit couple donated the infant's remains for medical research.  Four years later, Rachel Brown and Larry Davis don't know what happened to Alayah's tiny body.  They're plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed earlier this year that may help explain how the remains of 63 fetuses were discovered by police Friday [10/19/2018] in boxes and freezers at Perry Funeral Home at Warren and Trumbull on Detroit's west side.

The Editor says...
Please note that if a baby lived 27 minutes, he or she was no longer a fetus.  Thus the media's description of "63 fetuses" is dishonest.

Nine Lies the Media Are Telling You About Elizabeth Warren's DNA Test.  Spreading lies to benefit the Democrat Party is what the establishment media do.  For example, over the weekend, NBC News fabricated the lie that President Trump gushed over Confederate General Robert E. Lee.  This was a deliberate lie to smear Trump as racist, and it was only corrected by NBC after the lie had run its course.  Over the same weekend, CNN crafted its own lie to make Donald Trump Jr. look racist.  The media lie.  And then the media lie some more.  And now the media are lying about Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and her debacle of a DNA test.  These are lies of omission and commission, but they are still lies because the media are desperate to mislead and deceive.

Kavanaugh's confirmation smoked out the journo-activists.  "The racist history of Chevy Chase, home to power players like Brett Kavanaugh," read the headline on a story on the Washington Post on Sept. 29.  The hint, of course, is that Kavanaugh helped make it racist, moved there because it was racist, or helped make it more racist once he was there.  "As late as 1976," the Post said, "the New York Times noted that the Chevy Chase Club golf course and country club ... whose members include Supreme Court nominee Brett M. Kavanaugh and Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. — allowed 'black skinned members of the diplomatic corps' but not black Americans, inside its doors."  But in 1976, neither Roberts nor Kavanaugh belonged to the club or lived in Washington.  Kavanaugh, then aged 11, lived with his parents in Maryland.  Neither lived in Chevy Chase until it became a heavily liberal enclave.

Weather Channel defends reporter captured swaying in Florence winds as 2 people walk behind him.  As Hurricane Storm Florence lashed through the Carolinas with howling winds and heavy rain, one reporter was captured attempting to keep it together as winds appeared to lash at him, but was mocked when two people were seen walking behind him with little difficulty.  The viral video, which has more than 13.6 million views, showed Weather Channel correspondent Mike Seidel in Wilmington, North Carolina, trying to fight the heavy wind as he reported live from the storm on Friday [9/14/2018].

Media pretend left-wing mobs of protesters aren't really mobs.  Journalists spent last week rewriting history as it happened and denying the thuggery of left-wing protests.  It was like watching a reality TV version of "1984."  President Trump helped get the show rolling when he called left-wing protesters "an angry mob" and Republicans and conservative groups picked up the term.  It was repeated in several videos and in a key GOP commercial that highlighted scenes of violence.  The scenes in the commercial included:  the rioting and arson that took place protesting President Trump's inauguration; attacks on Trump campaign events; harassment of members of Congress; and protesters pounding on the Supreme Court doors to object to the Senate confirmation of now-Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.  This was all more than the media could stand and they spent the week trying to disprove reality.

Confirmation bias:  Brett Kavanaugh and the major media's worst moment.  We are now at the unsuccessful conclusion of a four-week-long effort by certain media organizations to prove Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh is a violent sexual predator and a lying alcoholic.  The reckless and grossly irresponsible scramble by the New Yorker, NBC News, the New York Times, and others to make Kavanaugh into a monster produced some of the worst journalism of the Trump era to date — and that's a pretty high bar.  There were plenty of minor fouls, including when the Times assigned a news story on Kavanaugh to a magazine opinion writer who openly opposed his nomination.  Others were much greater, including when NBC published an anonymously written letter alleging (with zero corroboration) that Kavanaugh was observed by an anonymous woman in 1998 to have pushed another anonymous woman.

Evil, Disgusting USA Today Article Hideously Lies About Judge Kavanaugh.  A USA Today hit piece, dated September 29, insinuated Brett Kavanaugh was a child molester.  The disgusting, outrageous attacks by the leftist media have reached a new low, even for them.  The title of the article is:  USA Today hit piece says Kavanaugh should 'stay off basketball courts when kids are around'.  The evil author is Donovan Slack.  He actually put his name on the piece accusing the judge of being a pedophile.  Outside of murder, that was the only thing left to the hideous leftists in the media.  This is literally a replay of the Salem Witch Trials.  They are destroying him as much as anyone they might like to kill.  They edited out several paragraphs but the entire article should have been trashed with an apology.  The article was presented as news, not opinion, and seemed to destroy his reputation and his ability to coach basketball.

NY Times removes key language helpful to Kavanaugh from article about Yale accuser Ramirez.  On Sunday night, September 23, 2018, The New Yorker published an article about accusations by Deborah Ramirez, a former Yale classmate of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.  The authors were Ronan Farrow and Jane Meyer.  The New Yorker article noted, deep into the article, that Ramirez's accusations were not corroborated by any witnesses with first hand knowledge, and that Ramirez herself had gaps in memory that were cleared up only after 6 days of thinking about it and consulting with lawyers.  The NY Times covered the story, and had language in its September 23 about Ford testifying that was extremely helpful to Kavanaugh's defense.  The language was added in an evening edit.

Character Assassins in the Fake News Media.  The Left's lack of respect for democratic principles, for political "others," their readiness to employ gutter tactics and mangle the truth, has spread from the Communist fringe publications of the 1960s — like The Nation, and the Daily Worker — to so-called mainstream publications like the Huffington Post, the New York Times, and the Washington Post.

New Yorker Publishes Accusation Containing ZERO Evidence to Support, and 100% of Evidence To Refute.  [Scroll down]  Really, no need to go further.  Why?  Because despite their search, and discussions with "dozens" of potential witnesses... "The magazine contacted several dozen classmates of Ramirez and Kavanaugh regarding the incident"[. T]he New Yorker was unable to find a single witness to corroborate the story being made by the accuser.  None.  Not a single confirming witness to back up the claim.

McConnell Blasts Democrats From Senate Floor Over "Orchestrated Hit" — Says Kavanaugh Will Be Voted On.  Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) blasted Democrats and their 11th hour "me too" ambush from the Senate floor Monday afternoon [9/24/2018].  McConnell said the resistance has become a smear campaign aided and abetted by members of the U.S. Senate.

Brett Kavanaugh Defies 'Grotesque Character Assassination' from the Left.  Supreme Court Nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh responded to the latest allegations of sexual misconduct on Monday [9/24/2018] by denouncing them as smears.  "These are smears, pure and simple.  And they debase our public discourse," he wrote in a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee.  "But they are also a threat to any man or woman who wishes to serve our country.  Such grotesque and obvious character assassination — if allowed to succeed — will dissuade competent and good people of all political persuasions from service."  Kavanuagh's letter expressed frustration with his delayed confirmation vote despite repeating his willingness to testify about the accusations from Christine Ford and a second "uncorroborated" report in the New Yorker.

This Kavanaugh furor:  How to execute an attempted political homicide.  As soon as Judge Brett Kavanaugh's once-anonymous accuser started stalling for time over testifying, you knew another sexual assault allegation was in the works.  Sure enough, a New Yorker story dropped Sunday night, when news competition would be minimal.  It's possible we'll have yet another tardy "revelation" before Thursday's scheduled appearances before the Senate Judiciary Committee, so desperate are opponents of the judge and President Trump.

Media Continues Its Slow Suicide.  After reviewing last week's news coverage, I would encourage President Trump to come up with a more accurate taunt than "fake news."  Maybe "garbage news." [...] But "fake news" is tame in light of the media's misleading, destructive, and willfully ignorant reporting last week that was intended further to inflame a divided body politic.  Some of the lowlights featured MSNBC morning host Joe Scarborough, claiming Trump has done more damage to the country than the 9/11 terrorists; the editorial board of a major newspaper blaming Trump for Hurricane Florence; the wholesale acceptance of a highly flawed paper about hurricane deaths used to bash the president; and a despicable crusade not just to quash Brett Kavanaugh's appointment to the Supreme Court, but to destroy his reputation and damage his young family.

The New York Times issues major correction to Kavanaugh sexual assault story.  It's one thing to misspell a name or get a specific date wrong.  It's another thing entirely to report that a supposed witness to a sexual assault says he remembers it happening when he has said the exact opposite.  For an example of the latter, we turn to the New York Times, which published a report Tuesday titled, "Christine Blasey Ford Wants F.B.I. to Investigate Kavanaugh Before She Testifies."

Egg on Their Faces:  New York Times Retracts False Nikki Haley Smear.  On Thursday [9/13/2018], the New York Times — America's newspaper of record — published a disgusting false smear against U.S. Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley.  The original article suggested Haley was responsible for spending $52,701 on curtains for the UN ambassador's house in New York City, when in reality the decision to purchase the curtains was made under former president Barack Obama.  The Times appended a correction at the top of the article, altered the headline, and removed the photo of Nikki Haley.  "Nikki Haley's View of New York Is Priceless.  Her New Curtains? $52,701." the original headline screamed, complete with a featured picture of Haley at the United Nations.  The original version of the article is unavailable, but a screenshot captured by the Washington Post's Aaron Blake revealed that the Times had substantially altered the article after receiving hefty criticism.

Fake News collapses on NYT.  The Obama administration ordered $52,701 worth of curtains for the apartment the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations.  To put that in perspective, the West Virginia Legislature impeached the entire state Supreme Court for wasting $32,000 to buy a couch.  So how did the New York Times report this Obama scandal?  "Nikki Haley's View of New York Is Priceless.  Her Curtains?  $52,701."  After Fox News pointed out the headline drapes do not match the rug of facts, the Times demoted the headline to "State Department Spent $52,701 on Curtains for Residence of U.N. Envoy."  Nope, nope, nope.  Nikki Haley did not build this.  Obama did.

New York Times Spreads Fake News About Nikki Haley's $52,701 Curtains.  A New York Times headline attacks UN Ambassador Nikki Haley's extravagant curtains, even though the Obama administration ordered them in 2016.  The fake news headline snarks, "Nikki Haley's View of New York Is Priceless.  Her Curtains? $52,701."  [...] The word "spent" is crucial, however, because after five whole paragraphs describing Haley's "spectacular views" in her leased $58,000 a month "full-floor penthouse, with handsome hardwood floors covering large open spaces stretching nearly 6,000 square feet," the Times at long last reveals the truth:  The Obama administration ordered those $52,701 curtains.  What's more the Obama administration chose the $58,000 per month penthouse.

NYT smears Nikki Haley over Obama's $53,000 UN curtains purchase.  Lacking a catch of late, the New York Times decided to pull a Scott Pruitt on United Nations ambassador Nikki Haley, accusing her of being Extravagance Woman, a regular Stateside Imelda, based on a $53,000 purchase of customized and mechanized curtains for her United Nations apartment. [...] Turns out the fancy curtain order was the work of Samantha Power, President Obama's former U.N. ambassador, who, when she wasn't busy unmasking Americans to learn all about what was going on in the Trump campaign (or maybe handing her password out, given the quantity of such unmaskings under her name), was also busy getting the decorating in — status stuff, like self-opening curtains, the better to impress the Harvard and NGO crowds who undoubtedly would come by to visit.  And it was President Obama who approved the purchase.

The Truth About TIME's 'Underpaid Teachers' Story.  "I Work 3 Jobs And Donate Blood Plasma to Pay the Bills.  This Is What It's Like to Be a Teacher in America," reads the cover of TIME Magazine this week — and the story is going viral.  I haven't been able to scroll through a social media feed without seeing someone linking to the article — which features the stories of a handful of allegedly struggling teachers. [...] While I'm all for paying certain teachers more, TIME's piece doesn't make a convincing case for that.  In fact, the TIME article doesn't do anything other than prove life is hard, given that all of the teachers profiled in the piece earn incomes above that of the average American.

Media pounce on conservatives and weaponize bias against Trump.  Anti-Trump news organizations continued to attack the president this past week on many fronts, including for what CNN Senior Political Analyst John Avlon called "a real culture of corruption."  In reality, Avlon should have been describing the state of journalism.  CNN, that stalwart of James Earl Jones voiceovers, has no room to point fingers.  It got caught believing another phony story about President Trump and is too stubborn and woke to admit it.  (Sort of like when three CNN investigative journalists had to resign in 2017, except then the network admitted they were wrong.)  Meanwhile, NBC is facing allegations from a former top producer that executives actively interfered in reporting on allegations of sexual misconduct against Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein.  And The New York Times has become increasingly obvious about the word play it injects into news stories, so its left-wing agenda remains intact.

Ohr speaks! (Behind closed doors).  You can almost smell the fear in the Get Trump camp that Bruce Ohr might be the thread that could be pulled to unravel the conspiracy of high-ranking officials to spy on the Trump campaign and then, after the election, put into action the "insurance policy" Peter Strzok mentioned to his mistress (and co-worker) Lisa Page in an August 2016 text message, to remove a duly elected president from office.  The New York Times, which serves as a pilot fish for the rest of the media, has been working hard to minimize the damage he might do.  On August 17, as Ohr's name was being introduced to inhabitants of the MSM bubble thanks to a threat by President Trump to remove his security clearance, the Times outright lied about his position in the Department of Justice, calling him a "midlevel" official in the DOJ.  This lie was picked up and repeated in many other articles and was used on cable news reports extensively, thereby falsely branding him as a minor player caught up and persecuted by Trump and anyone else paying attention.

South Africans Push Back Against Lying American Media — White Farmers Getting Killed Daily.  Residents of South Africa are creating videos backing up US President Donald Trump's claims that white farmers in South Africa are being murdered.  In riveting firsthand testimony uploaded to Twitter Monday [8/27/2018], several South Africans pushed back against the mainstream media, testifying violence against whites is on the rise.

Charlottesville and Masked Antifa:  The Fake News Media as Enemy of the People.  By now we all know that the White Racist Nazis who were expected in their thousands by the Seedier Media arrived few in number, but a ton of masked Antifa Nazis showed up.  To the degree (i) that "The People" benefit when White Racist Nazis remain few in number; (ii) that "The People" are hurt when the media go out of their way to inflate the numbers of White Racist Nazis in a self-serving coordinated media frenzy to increase numbers of White Racist Nazi demonstrators for more interesting television that leads to better ratings and increased advertising revenue; and (iii) that such fake news build-ups for days leading up to the Charlottesville anniversary actually threaten to draw more White Racist Nazis and to threaten the civil order... the Fake News Media indeed proved themselves to be the Enemy of the People.

Transgender 'Woman' Kills Her Own Grandmother With A Knife, Media Decides She's A 'Man'.  When is a transgender woman not a woman?  Apparently, when she kills her own grandmother, at which point "she" magically returns to being a "he"!

No sympathy for a lying press.  It's difficult to take the media's claims about attacks on the press seriously when they're constantly gaslighting the country. [...] Over and over again the press asserts that something is true, even though you saw with your own eyes that it's not.

The Media Are Hiding Their Knowledge and Duplicity.  We shared a discussion thread several months ago about how the media are enmeshed within the story of the DOJ and FBI corruption.  However, only recently did we discover the media engagements were not just pervasive, they were/are participatory.  As a consequence the same media cannot reasonably report on any aspect of the story without exposing their own duplicity; their only choice is to double down on lies they helped create and promote.

Media Rewrite History To Credit Obama Instead Of Trump.  The stronger the economy gets under President Trump, the more desperate his critics are to hand credit over to Obama.  Even if that entails changing the past.

Journalists used to fight fake news; today they pretend it doesn't exist.  The credibility of newspapers and of journalism in general depend on our ability to get the story right in the first place, and to admit our mistakes promptly in the second place. [...] Unfortunately, it seems that some big-name journalists today consider themselves and their chosen profession above reproach.  When President Trump calls them out for publishing fake news, they merely put their thumbs in their ears and shout back petulantly "NOT FAKE NOT FAKE!" no matter how obvious it is to an objective observer that it was indeed fake.  A prime example of that occurred last Sunday morning when President Trump's tweet about the Trump Tower meeting held by Don Jr. in 2016 was widely trumpeted as some kind of new (and damning) revelation when actually the president had said the exact same thing (in virtually the same words) a year earlier.

Levin: 'The media won't address its own unprofessionalism'.  Thursday [8/2/2018] on the radio, LevinTV host Mark Levin called out the media for reporting more on themselves than on legitimate news, and claiming that they are "under attack."  "The media keep reporting on the media, have you noticed that? ... The media have abandoned a pretense of seeking objectivity for ideological activism, progressivism ... they're devouring what they self-servingly claim to defend," Levin said.  [Audio clip]

The media whips up hatred among classes, races, religions, and exactly two sexes.
  •   The media constantly publish stories showing that white people are racist.  In the past 48 hours alone, the New York Times has published stories showing that white people are racist in hotels and at public swimming pools. [...] Nearly every day, the media write an article that reads, "White people are racist in [kind of place or circumstance]."  This repeated emphasis whips up racial resentment and encourages violence against white people.
  •   Not a day goes by without some gleeful account of how the non-white population of America is increasing, eagerly looking forward to the day when whites are in the minority.  This "in your face, white people!" mentality stirs up understandable resentment among white Americans.
  •   We are constantly told by the media to hate the rich, that if they have a lot of money, they must not have earned it legitimately, that "their" money should be "our" money.  The resentment built up by this kind of storyline encourages lawmakers to enact theft by higher taxation.
  •   Women are constantly told that most men are rapists or harassers who don't respect them.  Women are encouraged to turn against men and see rape in every dorm room and every janitor closet.
  •   We are repeatedly told that the police are racist.

Freeing People from Left-Wing Lies.  Because real people don't tell big lies, they assume that others won't, either.  Hence, when Hitler, or the WaPo, repeats big lies over and over, people tend to end up believing them so long as they don't hear any contradictory voices.  That's why so many Americans think abortion is legal only in the first trimester or for the hard cases when in fact it's legal for any reason at any time during a pregnancy.  That's why so many Americans think Trump somehow colluded with Russia even though there is not a shred of evidence to indicate that.  That's why so few Americans know that Carter Page, the supposed Russian spy targeted by the FISA warrant, helped the FBI sting to capture Russian spies in 2013.  Clearly, the media have to work hard to hide that from the bubble people they're trying to fool.  That's why few Democratic voters know that the NYT has armed guards to protect its newsroom even as it says making it harder for average citizens to have guns is a good thing.

The truth about 'Fake News'.  Janet Cooke is a prime example of why the Pulitzer Prize has essentially become worthless.  She won a Pulitzer Prize in 1981 for a sob story written for The Washington Post, but the story was later discovered to have been completely fabricated.  While Cooke subsequently returned the Pulitzer, she remains the only one who has.  Flash back to the New York Times Moscow correspondent reporter Walter Duranty, who won a Pulitzer in 1932 for a series of reports about the Soviet Union, 11 of them were published in June 1931.and completely denied the widespread famine (1932-1933) in the USSR, most particularly the mass starvation in Ukraine.

Deep Fake News.  The Brookings Institution warns that "fact checking" will become a lot harder in the 21st century as artificial intelligence becomes better at producing "deep fake news" creating counterfeits so good they are difficult to distinguish from the Real McCoy.  "Because the algorithms that generate the fakes continuously learn how to more effectively replicate the appearance of reality, deep fakes cannot easily be detected by other algorithms — indeed, in the case of generative adversarial networks, the algorithm works by getting really good at fooling itself."  The technology to fake videos, photographs and sound clips is now so good even Hollywood is increasingly using digital actors.  Moreover artificial intelligence can weave these fakes into a superficially self-consistent universe of lies creating a false narrative whose fraudulence can only be exposed by painstaking comparison to reality.

Mainstream Media On Their Last Legs.  What happens when the entire industry that is devoted to educating the public is doing so with a clear political slant, despite their claims of objectivity?  What ensues is an absolute lack of trust, and the ensuing panic from those that are most responsible for it.  You see more and more hands grasping for fewer straws.  You get the people who are supposed to be informing the republic choosing to denigrate and blatantly insult the American public, because they've lost their ability to do what they should be doing.

The Next American Revolution: #WalkAway.  My first inkling that Donald Trump might actually become President came about mid-evening on election night, 2016, when I switched to MSNBC to look at that infallible barometer of Republican success at the ballot box, the expressions of the "journalists" reporting the returns.  The first face I saw was that of Chuck Todd, who was frowning at a map of Wisconsin and maundering about Milwaukee. [...] His fear was well-founded.  Those Milwaukee precincts were emblematic of a nationwide phenomenon that contributed in no small part to Trump's victory — African-American enthusiasm for Hillary Clinton was tepid at best.  Both the Democrats and the "news" media have ignored this reality.  Their willful ignorance allows them to claim, as the brainiacs at Vox put it, "Trump won because of racial resentment."  Never mind that Hillary Clinton is conspicuously caucasian and that white turnout has remained relatively stable since 2004.

Mainstream Media Blame Donald Trump for Maryland Newspaper Shooter.  Several members of the mainstream media blamed President Donald Trump for a suspect who allegedly killed five journalists on Thursday [6/28/2018] and reportedly had a longstanding dispute with the newspaper dating back to before Trump even declared his candidacy for the Oval Office.  Per several reports, authorities late Thursday identified [...] the shooter who allegedly opened fire on the news staff of Maryland's The Capital-Gazette newspaper.  It came out shortly thereafter that [he] had a longstanding battle with the newspaper dating back nearly a decade [...]

Trump [is] Blamed for Death of Reporters.  Did Media Blame Obama for Cop Killers?  A man with a long-standing beef against the Annapolis, Maryland, newspaper Capital Gazette entered the paper's headquarters with a shotgun and murdered five staffers.  It represents the deadliest attack on U.S. reporters in modern history.  Before learning about the suspect's mental issues and his long-standing feud with the newspaper, some in the media blamed President Donald Trump.  After all, critics said, Trump routinely denounces "fake news" as an existential threat to our republic.  Connect the dots, they said.  Blame Trump!  CNN aired a montage of Trump's attacks on the media.  Rob Cox, a Reuters editor, tweeted:  "This is what happens when @RealDonaldTrump calls journalists the enemy of the people.  Blood is on your hands, Mr. President."  Another reporter, who later resigned, even falsely tweeted that the shooter was wearing a MAGA cap.  How do you get that wrong?

Is the First Amendment an Excuse for SLOPPY, AWFUL Journalism?  As most people know, once speech is "constitutionalized" by discussing public figures, public officials or matters of public concern, the aggrieved party must prove that the publication was issued with "actual malice", defined as "knowing falsity or reckless disregard for the truth."  Understanding the "knowing falsity" prong is simple.  If a publication invented a defamatory allegation out of thin air, they're likely to be ruled against.  Most media entities in that situation will argue in court that the statement isn't really defamatory or isn't really about the complainant.  More often than not when the press loses attempts to have a case dismissed on those grounds they write a check to make the problem go away.  The "reckless disregard" prong is much more difficult to navigate.

Journalists 'Fraudulently' Posed as Translators at Migrant Center, Say Feds.  U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officials said "several journalists" claimed to be translators in order to gain access to illegal immigrants being processed by Border Patrol agents after they illegally crossed the border from Mexico.  Two were identified as journalists by officials and turned away.  However, a third successfully gained entry on Tuesday [6/26/2018] and made their way "fraudulently" into the processing center during a time scheduled for attorney-client privileged meetings, CBP officials stated.

Reporter resigns after false tweet that Maryland shooting suspect had MAGA hat.  A reporter in Springfield, Mass., resigned from his job Friday [6/29/2018] after posting a Twitter message falsely stating that Maryland shooting suspect Jarrod Ramos had brought a "Make America Great Again" hat to the office of the Capital Gazette.  Conor Berry, who wrote for the Republican, tweeted an image of a MAGA hat Thursday, and suggested that Ramos had left it behind at the Gazette office after allegedly killing five Gazette employees.

The Editor says...
The only thing missing from this story is a follow-up article two days later in which the central figure says, "Can't you take a joke?"  But there's nothing in the initial coverage of this story that would indicate Mr. Ramos was trying to be funny.  Well, good luck in the used car business.  I mean, now that you're washed up in journalism, what else can you do with a journalism degree?

Reuters editor apologizes, could be disciplined after blaming Capital Gazette shooting on Trump.  A top editor at Reuters apologized on Thursday night [6/28/2018] after blaming President Trump for the deadly Capital Gazette shooting in a now-deleted tweet that was sent during a "state of emotional distress," but he might still be disciplined by the international news service.  Reuters Breakingviews Editor Rob Cox admitted that he "responded emotionally and inappropriately" after being called out for jumping to conclusions prior to the facts emerging.  Police said the suspected gunman, eventually identified as Jarrod W. Ramos, targeted the newspaper after a lengthy feud regarding a 2012 defamation lawsuit.  "This is what happens when [President] Trump calls journalists the enemy of the people.  Blood is on your hands, Mr. President.  Save your thoughts and prayers for your empty soul," Cox wrote in the deleted tweet, according to TheWrap.

Reporter Who Falsely Claimed Annapolis Shooter Wore MAGA Hat Resigns.  A reporter at a Massachusetts-based newspaper resigned Friday [6/29/2018] after falsely claiming in a tweet Thursday that the man who killed five employees at the Capital Gazzete newspaper left a "Make America Great Again" hat at the crime scene.  "Shooter who killed 4 people at Annapolis newspaper dropped his #MAGA hat on newsroom floor before opening fire," Conor Berry, a reporter at The Republican in Springfield, Mass., wrote in a now-deleted tweet.

Massachusetts Reporter Resigns After Suggesting Killer Was Trump Supporter.  A Massachusetts newspaper reporter has resigned after falsely suggesting the perpetrator of the deadly shooting at a Maryland newspaper was wearing a President Donald Trump-inspired "Make America Great Again" hat.  The Republican newspaper in Springfield reports Conor Berry has apologized for tarnishing the "good work of fair-minded journalists everywhere" in his Friday resignation letter.  Berry tweeted an image of the familiar red hat and suggested 38-year-old Jarrod Ramos had dropped a similar one on The Capital Gazette's newsroom floor before opening fire and killing five people Thursday.  The tweet has since been taken down.

Levin: The media 'create their own reality'.  LevinTV host Mark Levin began his radio show Friday evening [6/22/2018] discussing how the media have inserted ideological progressivism into their news reporting.  "They create their own reality.  And in this case, it's a progressive reality," Levin said of the media.  "And they push it out as news."  He recommended the book The Image:  A Guide to Pseudo-Events in America, by the late historian Daniel Boorstin, to explain how the news media attempt to indoctrinate the public.

7 Recent Lies From Media On Emotion-Driven Immigration Debate.  Democrats and the mainstream media continued to destroy any remaining credibility they have left with their recent hysteria surrounding the debate on illegal immigration as they pushed lie after lie in their attempts to emotionally manipulate voters.  Before jumping into the lies and false information that the media and Democrats have injected into the American public, it's important to note the timeline of events that led up to the creation of this current news cycle.  The current news cycle on the poor treatment of illegal immigrants began in late May when people like former Obama speechwriter Jon Favreau tweeted out an article from 2014 and falsely insinuated that it was the Trump administration that was responsible for it.

Lying Democrat, Lying MSM on the Border Crisis.  The entire crisis is a lie.  The media is lying! [...] NBC News is reporting nothing but fake news, claiming the President has caused a crisis at the border.  There is a crisis but it is because 50,000 illegal aliens are caught coming through each month and that doesn't count all the illegals not caught.  Tens of thousands of children as young as 4 years of age are being sent alone with cartels by their abusive parents.

Fake News and Immigration.  Unfortunately, Fake News is alive and all too well.  This was witnessed in spades this past week as the Fake News media lied through its fangs about the president on immigration.  The Fake Newsies, at least 90% of whom are Democratic Party operatives, waxed hysteria over the separation of Hispanic children from their immigrant parents, i.e. those who entered America illegally through the southern border.  Of course, the blame for all of this was laid at the feet of the president, who was excoriated by his political enemies in Washington D.C. and their apologists and fellow partisans in the Fake News industry for his "zero tolerance" policy.  By now, any remotely honest observer of the political scene should know that the truth is profoundly otherwise than what fake journalists and commentators would have us think.

Thoughts on Crying Babies, Dying Babies, and Media Deception.  The technique is proven and effective.  Put a moving, highly effective, propagandistic photo on the front page (or cover) of your story.  Cause a moral outrage in the public.  Then, several days (or even weeks) later, print a retraction somewhere in the middle of your publication where few will find it:  "We regret publishing a picture with a misleading caption."  It works like a charm!

Here Are The Photos Of Obama's Illegal Immigrant Detention Facilities The Media Won't Show You.  The media and political class become more and more outraged over the Trump administration's decision to detain and prosecute immigrants illegally crossing the border.  Lost in the debate is any acknowledgment that President Obama's administration also used detention facilities.  Current U.S. immigration laws, when enforced, have the consequence of temporarily separating adults who arrive with children into separate detention facilities in order to prosecute the adults.  The policy of prosecuting immigrants for crossing the border illegally has been in place for multiple administrations.  The Obama administration prosecuted half a million illegal immigrants and similarly separated families in the process.  So did the Bush administration.

Trump Speaks, The Media Lies, And The Artist Of The Deal Makes His Move.  The media lies.  That's why there are sites like RedState.  If you could simply turn on the television and trust what you heard, we would be unnecessary.  The same goes for much of the supposed news sources online.  For examples of this, look no further than coverage of the border family separation issue.  Among the mainstream news organizations, there seems to be no adherence to any notion of truth; there is only the media against Trump, which is oftentimes the media against truth.

No child should be used as a protest prop.  Actor Ron Perlman earned nearly 8,000 retweets when he posted a picture of a small crying child in a cage with the words "Trump, Sessions, McConnell, Ryan, this is on YOU!"  When multiple people responded with a link to Snopes informing him that the photo was a fake, and actually of a child at a protest, Perlman tweeted back:  "Maybe it's you!  Maybe you're fake."  The photo told a story he wanted to tell, and the fact that it wasn't real was irrelevant.  As of Thursday, the photo remained up on Perlman's page.  It's what used to be called "fake but accurate" but today goes by President Trump's preferred term, "fake news."  It's just too good to check.

IG Report:  FBI Officials Accepted Bribes From Media.  On Page Xii of the IG report the Department of Justice Office of Inspector General (DOJ-OIG) highlights numerous FBI officials who accepted bribes from multiple media outlets including: "tickets to sporting events", "golf outings", "drinks and meals" as well as exclusive invitations and admission to "nonpublic social events".

50 Media Mistakes in the Trump Era:  The Definitive List.  We the media have "fact-checked" President Trump like we have fact-checked no other human being on the planet — and he's certainly given us plenty to write about.  That's probably why it's so easy to find lists enumerating and examining his mistakes, missteps and "lies."  Our repeat mistakes involve declaring that Trump's claims are "lies" when they are matters of opinion, or when the truth between conflicting sources is unknowable; taking Trump's statements and events out of context; reporting secondhand accounts against Trump without attribution as if they're established fact; relying on untruthful, conflicted sources; and presenting reporter opinions in news stories — without labeling them as opinions.

As Snopes 'Debunks' Child Trafficking Camp, 160 Kids as Young as 3 Rescued in Georgia.  A massive sting operation carried out by the FBI in metro Atlanta captured dozens of child traffickers and rescued 160 children who had been forced into sex slavery by their captors.  This news comes as Snopes and the other ostensible arbiters of truth distort information claiming that similar trafficking is taking place in Arizona.  Illustrating the massive scope of the sting, called Operation Safe Summer, it was a collaborative effort between the FBI and 38 other law enforcement agencies from six metro counties.

Bay of Pics:  Media fakery targets Trump with photos of Obama-era child trafficking.  Over the Memorial Day weekend, photos of Central American children at a U.S. holding facility began to appear online.  Democrats and their media allies quickly hailed the pics as the latest exhibit of anti-Trump hysteria.  "Look at these photos," Linda Sarsour tweeted.  "Speechless," tweeted Antonio Villaraigosa, former Los Angeles mayor and candidate for governor of California.  "This is not who we are as a nation." [...] Trouble was, the story was from 2014, long before the Trump administration.  Likewise, As Saagar Enjeti noted in the Daily Caller, the detention center photos "stem from a 2014 Arizona Central story showing migrant children in steel cages.  The cages were implemented at the height of the Central American migrant crisis under the Obama administration."

Left buys into fake news about Martha Stewart refusing Trump pardon.  So did Martha Stewart refuse President Trump's pardon of her, on a maliciously prosecuted insider stock trading case, based on her progressive views?  Nope, not to anyone's knowledge.  But a satirical news site put that out there and sure enough, out on Twitter and elsewhere, much of the left bit into the fake news and passed it around.  Obviously, the satirists knew the left would believe it.

Did the Feds Lose 1,475 Migrant Children?  That's what you would conclude from this USA Today opinion piece headlined, "The feds lost — yes, lost — 1,475 migrant children."  It's a piece that's a pretty good example of how "fake news" works — there's some factual basis for the claim, but it's exaggerated or misunderstood, and then fed into the maw of the perpetual outrage cycle, in this case about the alleged extreme carelessness and heartlessness of the Trump administration toward migrant children.  Some background:  As we all know, in recent years there has been a flood of "unaccompanied children" (UAC) showing up at the border.  The U.S. government attempts to unite UAC with a parent or close relative in the U.S.  The HHS program to do this is longstanding and long pre-dated the Trump administration.  Given the size of the migrant flow, the scale of this task is enormous.

Media Spreads Two New Lies Aimed At Smearing ICE, Trump.  Multiple journalists, activists, and former Obama administration officials spread blatant falsehoods during Memorial Day weekend aimed at smearing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Trump administration.  The first false claim involved a news report showing photos of children in detention centers lying on floors that CNN's Hadas Gold, former Obama official Jon Favreau, Shaun King, and Linda Sarsour all shared and promoted as being recent when, in fact, the photos were from 2014, during the Obama administration.

The Latest Whopper — The FBI Was Actually Trying to 'Protect Trump'.  The Deep State has been weaving its own tangled web of Russian collusion for the past two years beginning with Russia supposedly hacking the 2016 election, creating the electoral outcome they desired.  It has since morphed into Trump colluding with the Russians, despite zero proof on the one-year anniversary of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's free-for-all investigation by his merry band of partisan Democrats.  It's now to the point that Mueller's team is investigating anyone in Trump's circle who ever ate a bowl of borscht or drank a sip of Russian vodka.  At a time when this couldn't get any more ridiculous, look no further than the Washington Post for a version of "can you top this?"

Who's An Animal?  Scarcely a day goes by without the news media lying about the president and his administration.  No wonder trust in the press is at an all-time low.  It should be.

Why the left buys into every anti-Israel smear.  Eight armed Hamas terrorists fought Israeli troops last Monday [5/14/2018].  All were killed — then counted in the day's death toll of "60 protesters."  Hamas itself identified 50 of the 60 "martyrs" as Hamas members and admitted to "terminological deception," because it was deploying "peaceful resistance bolstered by a military force."  The widespread condemnations of Israel caused by characterizing those 50 violent fence-invaders as "peaceful" suggests how Palestinians are playing so many for dupes.  Reporters love playing the "peaceful, oppressed protesters-of-color" against "the armed, white, persecuting soldiers" card (even though there are many dark-skinned Israelis and light-skinned Palestinians; the conflict is national not racial).  Images of flak-jacketed Israeli soldiers and injured Palestinians trigger waves of simplistic stereotypes.  Suddenly, the Palestinians are Martin Luther King and Mahatma Gandhi and Black Lives Matter all in one.

Liberal Lies And Slanders Are A Slippery Slope To Trouble.  [Scroll down]  It's a bad faith strawman strategy, and it often manifests itself in the New Obtuseness, the stubborn insistence that what someone just said is something entirely different than what he actually said.  It's basically fancy lying.  The New Obtuseness was in full effect recently when Trump called MS-13 dirtbags "animals."  Despite the video of him discussing these evil gangbanging scum, the liberals and their media windowlickers insisted that he was calling all illegal aliens "animals."  And they knew it wasn't true — they just lied, knowingly and intentionally.  They do it all the time.  We, presumably, are supposed to disbelieve our own lying eyes and ears.

Anatomy of a Smear:  How the Media Created a Malicious Lie About Trump's 'Animals' Comment.  On Wednesday afternoon [5/16/2018], President Donald Trump hosted a "California sanctuary state roundtable" discussion at the White House.  Infamously, he referred to violent MS-13 gang members as "animals."  Americans wouldn't get that impression from reading Thursday's headlines, however.  "Trump Calls Some Unauthorized Immigrants 'Animals' in Rant," screamed The New York Times's Julie Hirschfeld Davis.  Her article referenced MS-13 only once, buried as an aside in the third paragraph:  "He exhorted his administration to 'do much better' in keeping out undesirable people, including members of transnational gangs like MS-13."  USA TODAY ran with the headline "Trump ramps up rhetoric on undocumented immigrants:  'These aren't people.  These are animals.'"  To their credit, Gregory Corte and Alan Gomez included a bit more context than The New York Times did.  Even so, MS-13 did not come up until the fourth paragraph, and the opening sentence suggested that the president was "calling undocumented immigrants 'animals.'"

CNN Says There Have Been 22 School Shootings This Year.  That's A Lie.  CNN used the following parameters for their count:
  •   A shooting that involved at least one person being shot (not including the shooter)
  •   A shooting that occurred on school grounds
  •   We included grades K through college/university level
  •   We included gang violence, fights and domestic violence
  •   We included accidental discharge of a firearm as long as the first two parameters are met
So, in other words, not mass shootings; not even purposeful shootings; not even shootings involving children.  If a gang member shot another gang member on school grounds during the summer, this would count as a school shooting.  If a wife shot a husband at a school, they counted it.

White House Correspondents' Association Exposed Regularly Spends About 85% of WHCD Revenue on Annual Party, Not Scholarships.  The White House Correspondents' Association (WHCA) has long-cited its scholarships for aspiring journalists to justify the tax-exempt charitable status of its blow-out, televised annual dinner, but only a small fraction of the IRS-designated 501(c)(3) organization's fundraising is awarded to students.  Last year, just 13.4 percent of the White House Correspondents' Dinner's revenue went to scholarships.

Drew Cloud Is a Well-Known Expert on Student Loans.  One Problem:  He's Not Real.  Drew Cloud is everywhere.  The self-described journalist who specializes in student-loan debt has been quoted in major news outlets, including The Washington Post, The Boston Globe,, and CNBC, and is a fixture in the smaller, specialized blogosphere of student debt. [...] After The Chronicle spent more than a week trying to verify Cloud's existence, the company that owns The Student Loan Report confirmed that Cloud was fake.  "Drew Cloud is a pseudonym that a diverse group of authors at Student Loan Report, LLC use to share experiences and information related to the challenges college students face with funding their education," wrote Nate Matherson, CEO of LendEDU.  Before that admission, however, Cloud had corresponded at length with many journalists, pitching them stories and offering email interviews, many of which were published.

Fake News Takes Down Another Good Man:  Dr. Ronny Jackson Resigns as White House Doctor After Liberal Lies.  Democrat Senator Jon Tester led the charge last week spreading false rumors against Trump VA pick Admiral Ronny Jackson.  Tester played point man to smear and slander Admiral Jackson with false allegations of inappropriate behavior.  Admiral Jackson withdrew his nomination after the false allegations were released and shared widely by the liberal mainstream media.  The Secret Service later came out and said the allegations were completely false.

Who Was Worse — Michelle Wolf or Her Audience?  [Scroll down]  It's the Golden Age of Leaking, not Journalism. [...] The role of the press in the whole Christopher Steele dossier business would simply be nauseating if it weren't sinister.  When the full story of the suborning of the FISA court in an attempt to bring down a sitting president is finally fully revealed, the despicable role of the press, how they allowed themselves to be used, even encouraged it, will be uncomfortably evident.

The New York Times' Hatchet Job On Devin Nunes Is Riddled With Errors.  Jason Zengerle publicly announced his profile of Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., in today's [4/29/2018] New York Times Sunday Magazine with the snarky tweet, "My latest for the @NYTmag on Devin Nunes, who's been propagating, not to mention falling for, conspiracy theories since before the Deep State was even in a gleam in Donald Trump's eye."  It's an accurate summation of the hit he attempted to place on Nunes, the chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI).  The only problem is the case he attempts to make is riddled with errors and full of embarrassing and deliberate material omissions.

Leftist Propaganda Thwarts Unity.  In Nazi Germany, the people believed, right up to the bitter end, that they were going to win the war.  They did so because all the news they got was from state-controlled media.  In North Korea, until very recently, most people thought that, even though they were starving to death, the people in South Korea had it much worse.  Once again, they believed so because the state controlled the media and fed them lies.  Only with the availability of illegal cell phones from China did the people start to learn just how good life was elsewhere.  During the Cold War, citizens of the Soviet Union believed that Americans lived in poverty.  After all, didn't all the papers say so?  Today in America, we have a similar situation.

Don't Be Misled by the Media, Cuba Isn't Changing.  After the nominal change in Cuba's leadership, the New York Times managed to come out with the most New York Times headline ever:  "More Black Officials in Power in Cuba as Leadership Changes."  The Los Angeles Times demanded that as Castro era "ends" in Cuba, so should the U.S. embargo.  NPR followed hopefully, and Buzzfeed provided a romanticized photo spread.  Reading such affectionate and hopeful portrayals might make one want to believe that Cuba really is currently undergoing a transformation that will define its future.  I hate to shatter that optimism, but Cuba isn't changing, and American policymakers and media really shouldn't be so naïve and optimistic about it.

The New York Times Best-Seller List:  Another Reason Americans Don't Trust The Media.  About half the American people do not believe the mainstream media tell the truth.  They believe the media are more interested in promoting their left-wing views than reporting the truth. [...] In order to think it is mere coincidence, you have to believe The New York Times more than reality itself, which about half the country seems to.  While The Times occasionally lists conservative books and, very rarely, religious books, after comparing the list and the BookScan list, the Observer concluded in 2016:  "If you happen to work for The New York Times and have a book out, your book is more likely to stay on the list longer and have a higher ranking than books not written by New York Times employees. ... If you happen to have written a conservative-political-leaning book, you're more likely to be ranked lower and drop off the list faster than those books with a more liberal political slant."  In other words, The New York Times best-seller list is not a best-seller list — which even The New York Times once acknowledged.

Caravan?  What Caravan?  As everyone knows, a "caravan" of more than 1,000 Hondurans is making its way North through Mexico toward the United States.  This caravan had sought, and drawn, a great deal of publicity before President Trump began talking about it. [...] Weirdly, the liberal media pretended to have no idea what the President was talking about.

A Tale of Black Racism.  The Philly media, like the media elsewhere, makes much of gentrification.  Philadelphians are forever hearing about what a social evil it is. [...] Constantly propagating notions such as white supremacy, white privilege, gentrification, and others, the media creates a kind of toxic intellectual air.  Unhappy people breathe it in, and the result is all sorts of mad beliefs.  It is as if being white guaranteed a middle-class existence.  It is as if being black meant that personal failure is not even a possibility; in place of it there is always some white discrimination or other.

77% believe the media lies.  "More than 3-in-4 Americans believe that traditional major TV and newspaper media outlets report Fake News, including 31% who believe this happens regularly and 46% who say it happens occasionally.  The 77% who believe fake news reporting happens at least occasionally has increased significantly from 63% of the public who felt that way last year," Monmouth University reported.  That is a fundamental threat to our republic.  The media keeps telling us we need informed voters — and then it misinforms voters.  Repeatedly.

Poll: 77 Percent Believe Traditional Media Guilty of Fake News.  According to a survey by the Monmouth University Polling Institute, the vast majority of Americans believe that mainstream media outlets report "fake news."  A whopping 77 percent of over 800 respondents relayed their distrust for major news organizations in both television and print — a marked increase from the 63 percent that was already skeptical a year ago.  Of those, 31 percent believe it to be a regular occurrence, while 46 percent see it as a more occasional issue.

You've Been Hoodwinked. (Perhaps.).  My friends on the far left are convinced that Sinclair anchors reading a national promo is Hitler-esque Orwellian brainwashing.  My friends on the far right are happy and hopeful that Sinclair might, indeed, be pushing conservative views.  Those in the middle don't care or seem to think it's much ado about nothing.

The Herd Media Stampedes Sinclair.  In an unguarded moment during the 2016 campaign, MSNBC's Mika Brzezinski remarked that it is "our job," not Trump's, to "control exactly what people think."  The Sinclair Broadcast Group referenced that line in its promo.  But the news accounts of the phony controversy over the promo never mention that Brzezinski did in fact make that outrageous comment.  Unless I missed it, Brzezinski herself didn't acknowledge the reference to the comment she made.  Gripping her chair like a Victorian fainting couch, Brzezinski found the promo "frightening."  But beneath the hysterical blather was nothing more than the hurt feelings of an exposed liberal propagandist.  Sinclair had nailed her and she didn't like it.  It is rich farce to see the herd media stampeding Sinclair for refusing to join it.  How dare Sinclair read its own script and not ours!  That's the demand implicit in the media's temper tantrum, all while journalists pontificate about the importance of a "free press."

The Knee-Jerk Liberals Spit At Sinclair.  [Scroll down]  MSNBC's Joe Scarborough shamelessly lectured that it is like the days of Pravda in the Soviet Union:  "A national broadcasting system that is shoving propaganda down local anchors' throats straight from the pen of somebody who's a Trump acolyte," he stated hysterically, "is really, really chilling."  Chilling?  This man appears on a national broadcasting system pushing propaganda daily.  A network whose motto in former President Obama's years was "Lean Forward" (which sounded like former Communist Chairman Mao Zedong's Great Leap Forward) and that passes judgment on propaganda is why networks like Sinclair have emerged.  On HBO, John Oliver denounced Sinclair anchors as sounding like "members of a brainwashed cult."  So, exactly how do anchors of news or entertainment shows across the country deliver their reports?  Oliver doesn't have a script?

The Editor says...
This story is about a corporate-mandated editorial that was supposed to run on every station owned by Sinclair.  It appears that each station put its most trusted news anchors on camera and had them read the prescribed script.  Dave Chiselface and Suzie Plastique make a lot of money, and they'll read whatever they're told to read — with a smile.  Any resemblance to sincerity is the product of Dave and Suzie's acting skills.  It's a story about media dishonesty only because it's an editorial comment disguised as a promo, and because the typical viewer doesn't know that all the other TV stations owned by the same company are airing the same editorial.

News Anchors At Sinclair Owned Stations Caught Reading From Same Corporate Mandated Script.  Sinclair Broadcast Group, which owns nearly 200 local television stations across the country as well as a wide variety of other assets in radio and online media, is under scrutiny this morning after video emerged of local anchors at a number of the stations it owns reading what appears to be a corporate-prepared script that touches on the whole so-called "fake news" phenomenon.

Brilliant Agitprop Outlines Modern Media.  [Video clip]

Keywords:  Teleprompter, rip and read, propagandists, phony concerned look, plastic-coated, sock puppets
Sinclair Made Dozens of Local News Anchors Recite the Same Script.  It may not have seemed strange to individual viewers.  But Timothy Burke, the video director at Deadspin, had read a report last month from CNN, which quoted local station anchors who were uncomfortable with the speech.  Mr. Burke tracked down the Sinclair affiliates and found when they had aired what he called a "forced read."

Sociologist: Less Than 10 Percent Of March For Our Lives Participants Were Children.  A sociologist on MSNBC threw cold water on all the media's claims that the March For Our Lives protests were spontaneous and led by the nation's children during a "Morning Joe" segment on Monday [3/26/2018].  University of Maryland sociologist Dana Fisher conducted a study of the demographics of Saturday's march in Washington, D.C., and discovered that only less than 10 percent of those in the crowd were under the age of 18.  While Fisher tried to make it sound like these individuals were all potential voters, it is likely that many of those who showed up were simply run-of-the-mill liberal activists.

A User's Guide To Media Coverage Of Political Protests.  [L]iberal protests are somehow not political.  When co-host Meghan McCain stated the facts on these marches on "The View" — a show that advocates passing gun control legislation and sticking it to the National Rifle Association — Whoopi Goldberg was outraged.  She said:  "Let's stick to what this particular march is today. ... It's not political."  What will Whoopi claim next?  That "The View" isn't political either?  The Women's March organizers of this walkout wanted to protest not just gun violence but also racism, police brutality and how "the United States has exported gun violence through imperialist foreign policy to destabilize other nations."  That's superpolitical.

The Corporate War on Free Speech.  [T]his same media weren't nearly as shrill about the fact that an alleged Black Lives Matter supporter blew away five cops in Dallas in 2016.  This was after BLM-inspired rioting and beatings across the country that were based on dubious half-truths peddled by the same media about a series of incidents that turned out to be much more complicated once the facts slowly leaked out.  Hands up, don't shoot?  He was just buying Skittles?  He couldn't breathe, even though he was able to say he couldn't breathe eleven times?  Assigning guilt is a slippery and often slimy business, but one might plausibly argue that the way the mainstream media has purposely sculpted sensational racial narratives has in some way led to, or at least enabled, acts of violence and even murder.  Despite — or maybe even because of — all that, corporate media stand firmly and proudly behind groups such as Black Lives Matter.

Sharyl Attkisson Explains the Origins of the 2016 'Fake News' Narrative.  In a Tedx Talk at the University of Nevada a couple of weeks ago (watch the video below) investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson revealed the origins of the "fake news" narrative that was aggressively pushed by the liberal media and Democrat politicians during the 2016 election, and how it was later flipped by President Donald Trump.  Attkisson pointed out that "fake news" in the form of tabloid journalism and false media narratives has always been around under different names.  But she noticed that in 2016, there seemed to be a concerted effort by the MSM to focus America's attention on the idea of "fake news" in conservative media.  That looked like a propaganda effort to Attkisson, so she did a little digging and traced the new spin to a little non-profit called "First Draft," which, she said, "appears to be the about the first to use 'fake news' in its modern context."

The Editor says...
I don't know what Tedx is.  Nor do I care.

Fake News Flashback:  CNN Declared Trump 'Bonkers' for Saying Clinton, Dems Behind Dossier.  Writing for the far-left CNN back in October, Chris Cillizza declared President Donald Trump "bonkers" and "crazy" for suggesting what turned out to be 100 percent true:  that the Democrats, Hillary Clinton, the FBI, and Russia, were all behind what is known as the "Russian dossier."

Confronting Leftist Lies.  Movies and TV shows are no longer mindless entertainment.  Ninety-nine percent of what comes out of Hollywood is lies; designed to seduce Americans into embracing Leftists' ungodly agenda.  Hollywood relentlessly demonizes Christians, America, mainstream Americans, and Trump. [...] The 6 o'clock news was on the TV in the background while I was chatting with a relative at his home Folks, it was a truly painful experience.  Every news story was liberal spin and/or lies.  Programming after the news was seductive liberal propaganda.  I watched my relatives unknowingly soaking in all the Leftist beautifully presented excrement.

The Nunes Memo: Just an Opening Act.  Wonder of wonders, the liberal press, long opposed to prior restraint when it comes to publishing material on American intelligence, is howling about the release of the Intelligence Committee memo.  They're suddenly concerned, we're supposed to believe, about damage to national security and the institutional well-being of the FBI.  Democrats and their media allies, notes Roger Simon, have pushed themselves into a corner.  They can't decide whether the best approach is to insist that the memo is a "nothing-burger" or a mortal danger to the country.

Journalism is Dead.  This week we saw a perfect example of how corrupt journalism has become.  There was an opportunity to report the news and journalists and their fellow travelers in the pundit class balked.  While that wasn't unusual, what was is how they did it in the lead up to the news, not bothering to wait until they'd seen what they were attempting to discredit. [...] The lying by Democrats in the lead up to the memo's release wasn't surprising, nor was the complicity of journalists in spreading that lie.  What was is how there was virtually no curiosity or interest in the memo and its contents in the days leading to its release from the people whose job it is supposed to be to convey information to the public.  All journalists did was attempt to taint it's release so as to foster disinterest in it in their audience when they could finally see it.

Transcript Shows The Daily Beast Peddled Fake News About Devin Nunes.  Once again, reporters got burned by believing anonymous Democrats on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.  Betsy Woodruff and Spencer Ackerman of The Daily Beast credulously believed their "sources familiar with the exchange," who said Republican Rep. Devin Nunes, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, refused to deny he had coordinated with the White House when putting together a memo alleging surveillance and law enforcement abuses at the FBI.  In fact, Nunes explicitly denied the charge before shutting down the line of questioning in order to provide other members who were not trying to hijack the hearing time to get actual committee business done.

The Tet Offensive Revisited:  Media's Big Lie.  Josef Goebbels called it the Big Lie, the deliberate misrepresentation of facts and reality in order to achieve a political objective.  It's been part and parcel of the New World Disorder we've lived under for the past century, ever since Vladimir Lenin first used a Big Lie to disguise his seizure of power from Russia's post-czar provisional government in November 1917, by telling the Russian people he was preventing a coup not perpetrating one.  America's first major encounter with the Big Lie, with all its disastrous consequences, started 50 years ago today, when the American mainstream media — CBS and the other networks, plus the New York Times and the Washington Post — decided to turn the major Communist Tet offensive against U.S. forces and South Vietnam on January 30, 1968, into an American defeat, rather than what it actually was:  a major American victory.

"I love Trump for being frank with Africans".  Conan O'Brien went to a resort in Haiti to prove it is not a [bad] country.  The people who live there know better than the tourists.  Conan's trip was too clever by half.  Inadvertently, he showed himself as a white guy millionaire with a Harvard degree sipping an adult beverage from some sort of coconut shell — while nearby, one million native people are still without sewers eight years after the earthquake.  How is this different from the colonialism Haitians overthrew 227 years ago?

Media lying about McConnell to help save face for Chuck Schumer.  Chuck Schumer has a huge problem, and his friends in the mainstream media are pitching in to help — with lies.  Now that he has caved in on the Schumer Shutdown, the radicals who dominate his party are angry and demanding protection for the DACA illegal aliens, and Schumer has promised to oppose funding the border wall that he had earlier discussed supporting in return for action in DACA.  But instead of reporting on the disarray among the Democrats, the narrative just has to be that the evil Republicans engaged in perfidy.

Poll Shows Public Waking Up to Media Lies About GOP Tax Plan.  Now that a little thing called economic reality has overtaken months of dishonest media reporting about the Republican tax bill signed into law by President Trump last month, a plurality of 47 percent support the bill, while only 34 percent remain opposed.  This is a huge (and predicable) turnaround when compared to those polls released in the heart of the media campaign to kill the tax bill.

Bloomberg wins Fake News of the week.  Bloomberg broke a story just as the New York Stock Exchange began trading on Wednesday [1/10/2018]:  ["]China Weighs Slowing or Halting Purchases of U.S. Treasuries["]  The story turned out to be the latest in a string of Fake News reports by a news organization owned by Mike Bloomberg, whose opposition to President Trump knows no bounds[.]  Bloomberg's anger at Trump has rendered his company unreliable when it comes to financial news.

Poor Hillary Clinton.  Until 2016, none had thought to make it an issue of gender, largely because one gender had been shared by all comers.  But in 2016, that was changed by the serious entry of Hillary Clinton, who managed to lose to Donald Trump against all odds.  Afterward, she blamed her female sex for the loss, after first blaming FBI Director James Comey. [...] Recent history is rife with examples of people whose very rough treatment (by Hillary's allies) make her tribulations seem tame.  In 2012, Mitt Romney, a Dudley Do-Right if ever there was one, was slammed by the press and the Democrats as a sadist (for transporting his dog on the roof of his car); as a bully (for cutting the hair of a classmate in prep school); as a murderer (for causing the wife of a worker to expire from cancer); as dismissive of females (for using the phrase "binders of women" to refer to resumes given to him by people as possible candidates for government jobs).

New York Times Gets the Facts Wrong on Land Mines.  According to the Times, 8,605 people were injured or killed in 2016 by land mines and "other booby-trap explosives."  Well, 8,605 is the ICBL's headline figure, no doubt about that.  But were all those people actually injured or killed by land mines?  Absolutely not.  If you turn to page 57 of the ICBL's report, you'll find that only 732 people were injured or killed by an anti-personnel land mine, another 495 by an anti-vehicle mine, and another 538 by an "unspecified" mine.  That's 1,765 people, not 8,605.  The Times says that casualties to land mines are rising.  But the ICBL's report says that in 2015, 2,002 people were injured or killed by these kinds of mines.  So casualties are actually down by 237, not up.

The History of Fake News in the United States.  Fake news isn't suddenly ruining America, but putting government in charge of deciding what news is fake will.  In the wake of President Donald Trump's victory in the 2016 election, numerous media outlets ran stories claiming that many websites had published false stories that helped Trump beat Hillary Clinton.  Since then Left-leaning opinion writers have called for a solution to this alleged epidemic.  The New York Times reported last January that Silicon Valley giants Facebook and Google will team up with legacy media outlets to fact-check stories and curtail the proliferation of "fake news."  However, intentionally misleading news has been around since before the invention of the printing press.

Alarmed by fake news, states push media literacy in schools.  Alarmed by the proliferation of false content online, state lawmakers around the country are pushing schools to put more emphasis on teaching students how to tell fact from fiction.

Half of all Americans believe the media make up anti-Trump stories.  Nearly half of all Americans believe media outlets fabricate negative stories about President Trump, according to a new survey.  Forty-four percent of respondents in the 2017 Poynter Media Trust Survey say the media invent "fake news" to make the president look bad.  Of that cohort, 24 percent say negative stories about Mr. Trump are made up "about half of the time"; 14 percent "most of the time"; and 6 percent "all of the time."  Seventy-seven percent of that cohort are Trump supporters, and 74 percent are Republicans.

CNN is a race-baiting, anti-Trump network.  Leave it to the mainstream media to concoct some sort of wild-eyed theory that President Trump's promise to say "Merry Christmas" is some sort of coded language for white nationalism and white supremacy.  CNN host Don Lemon was among the most high-profile mainstream media minions to advance the race-baiting narrative.

Dishonest Reporter of the Year Award 2017.  How can a writer sitting at home, whether in Beirut or London, possibly get the full picture using a computer or a telephone for his or her information?  The Independent's Mideast correspondent, Bethan McKernan, is based in Beirut.  The overwhelming majority of her articles about Israel, the Palestinians, Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Turkey, Libya, and the Gulf states in 2017 had Beirut datelines.

MSNBC's Katy Tur Wrongly Claims Trump Hasn't Had a Press Conference Lately.  Pam Key at Breitbart reported that Friday on MSNBC, host Katy Tur said it was "laughable" that President Donald Trump had only had one solo press conference in his first year.  "He's been dodging questions from the press for months now, really.  He hasn't had a press conference since what, February?" she asked NBC's Kristen Welker.  "That is laughable.  It's laughable, Kris, that the president can't stand in front of the press and take questions from the press."  This is self-evidently untrue.

The Death Of Science Journalism.  There was a time when Americans trusted the news.  How times have changed.  According to Gallup, Americans' trust in the media has fallen from 72% in 1976 to 32% in 2016.  The partisan divide is striking:  Trust among Democrats (51%) is higher than among Independents (30%) and Republicans (14%).  When asked their opinion of the honesty and ethics of various professions, journalists perform rather poorly, ranking below chiropractors and bankers and just above lawyers.  The partisan divide is easy to explain.  Among journalists, Democrats outnumber Republicans by about 4 to 1.  It's naive to believe that such a partisan imbalance has no effect on the tone or quality of press coverage.  However, it is doubtful that fact alone accounts for the widespread distrust of journalists.  After all, among scientists, Democrats outnumber Republicans by 9 to 1, but the public still respects them.  So, what's going on?  In a word:  Lying.  Many journalists have an ideological axe to grind, and if the truth is on their side, great.  If not, who cares?  Instead of the "L-word," civilized people are supposed to use euphemisms, such as "one-sided" or "not the whole story."  But let's put the faux propriety aside.  Purposefully presenting only half the story is a form of lying.

Five ways the media tries to convince us tax cuts are bad.  To hear the media tell it, tax cuts are Bad For You and you won't like the result.  Pay no attention to the fact that the cost of living is up, the government is bigger, incomes have stagnated, large corporations are no longer creating jobs, and the U.S. hasn't had a major tax cut since 1986.  Somehow, we are all supposed to believe tax cuts which put more of our own money in our pockets, will make us miserable.  It's the most fallacious collection of up-is-down arguments ever assembled.

NY Times Reports Obama Only Told 18 Falsehoods During Entire Presidency.  A recent New York Times analysis claims that over his eight years in office, former President Barack Obama only told 18 distinct lies.  The Times set out to compare the trustworthiness of Obama compared to President Donald Trump.  "In his first 10 months in office, [Trump] has told 103 separate untruths, many of them repeatedly.  Obama told 18 over his entire eight-year tenure," the piece reads.  On the list are some of Obama's most well-known whoppers, including "If you like your health care plan, you'll be able to keep your health care plan," and that he "didn't set a red line" on Syria's use of chemical weapons.  By contrast, fact-checker Politifact ruled that over the course of his presidency, Obama made 43 "false" statements and 48 "mostly false" statements.  Politifact also identified 7 "pants on fire" statements, which are falsehoods that are "not accurate and make a ridiculous claim."

Because they won't do it themselves...
Trump is cleaning up journalism.  The first ten days of December have seen:
  [#1] ABC News's Brian Ross lie about General Flynn's plea bargain.
  [#2] Reuters and Bloomberg News report on an imaginary subpoena of Trump's records at a German bank.
  [#3] CNN lie about Donald Trump Junior being tipped off about a WikiLeaks.
  [#4] David Weigel of the Washington Post lie about the size of the crowd at a Trump rally.
Liars all of them.  Byron Tau of the Wall Street Journal tweeted:  "CNN corrects its earlier report, which appears to be an honest error from two excellent reporters."

CNN: False Reporting is the New Normal.  The fact is, the media is not trying to report the news, they are trying to control the narrative.  They know that even false reporting puts a certain line of thinking in the minds of the audience.  Even lies can get people to think what you want them to think, if you apply it properly.

All The Proof You'll Ever Need That America's Media Really Are 'Fake News'.  There need be no doubt anymore:  America's mainstream news media hypes fake news — and that's a fact.  This past week was disastrous for the press.  A slew of fake stories rained down, pushed by anxious anchormen placed in powerful posts.  And we want to note before we go on, that ALL of this happened in a single week. [...] On Saturday [12/9/2017], a Washington Post reporter tweeted out a photo of a rally Trump was holding in Florida, which showed a half-empty Pensacola Bay Center.  But the photo was taken long before the president spoke — when the entire arena was packed to the gills.

Wow!  Trump fights back, forces public apology from Washington Post writer for fake news.  [Dave] Weigel, for those who do not remember, was a central figure in JournOlist, the invitation-only online conspiracy among progressive journalists to manipulate news coverage in their favor.  He was allowed to resign from the Washington Post for that activity, only to be hired back in 2015, once that paper become the political tool of the world's richest (or second or third richest — depending on Amazon's daily stock price) man, Jeff Bezos.  This is the capstone for a catastrophic week for Trump's opponents in the mainstream media, forced to withdraw and apologize for multiple stories attacking the POTUS.

Trump Blasts WaPo's Dave Weigel After Reporter Heckles Him with Fake Photo.  The context here is crucially important:  [#1] The photo Weigel published was taken before the Trump rally began.  And, as you will see below, Weigel knew he was publishing a photo not taken during the actual rally.  [#2] Weigel, who identifies as an objective reporter, is not only publishing a misleading photo, but the link at the top of his now-deleted tweet proves that he is responding directly to one of Trump's tweets — in other words, he is publicly heckling the president personally.  [#3] By responding directly to the president in this way, Weigel is openly taunting Trump, even going so far as to troll the president with his own "packed to the rafters" comment.  Even if the photo had been a legitimate representation of the crowd-size, directly jeering the president in this way is still outrageous behavior from anyone who describes himself as a legitimate journalist.

'They all knew': Media elites roared in laughter at obscene 2008 'roast' sending up Matt Lauer's office sexcapades.  Embattled NBC executives have been falling over themselves, insisting they had no idea about Matt Lauer's pervy past.  But if anyone doubts that New York's media elite was aware of Lauer's reputation, they should look no further than a top-secret "roast" of Lauer that took place in October 2008.  The notorious event — now legendary in New York media circles — pushed the outer limits of sexist, racist, homophobic and obscene jokes — and left little doubt that Lauer's colleagues knew NBC's biggest star had a troubled marriage and a wandering eye.

Media meltdown and the damage it does to democracy.  Relying on the supposedly respectable news media would have left you believing that the FBI found President Trump urging national security adviser Michael Flynn to contact Russia during the campaign (it didn't), that Trump national security aide K.T. McFarland wrote that Russia threw the election to Trump (she didn't), and that Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, blasted sick, poor children as slackers (he didn't).  These false or misleading stories, all of which, not coincidentally, disparaged Republicans, were parroted and retweeted and broadcast by countless reporters before being completely debunked.  Countless readers and viewers still don't realize that the stories produced by this sloppy reporting are false.

Sick and Tired of Schumer and Others Continually Lying about Tax Cuts and Debt.  What makes me sicker is that almost all reporters just repeat Schumer's talking points as if they are factual.  They repeat the outright lies over and over again, and then after indoctrinating the readers with pure garbage, they take a poll of fewer than 1,000 people, skewed with more Democrats than Republicans, to show that the people aren't in favor of reform.  Then they run the poll results as if they are somehow factual news.  Reporters should be truly ashamed of themselves for pushing an agenda instead of ever even considering reporting actual results of previous tax cuts.

The Mainstream Media Doesn't Deserve Our Respect or Our Trust.  You mainstream media hacks want trust and respect?  Maybe you shouldn't Tweet out instructions to contact Senators to defeat the tax bill like the New York Times just did.  Maybe you should stop covering for the off-camera leering and grabbing and pinching of the talking heads who excoriate Trump for misogyny.  Maybe you should stop hiring journalists who are ex-Obama flunkies.  Maybe you shouldn't email offers of assistance to Democrat campaigns.  Maybe you should stop lying to us.

The Democratic Party Is Dead.  For years, we have been hearing that the Republican Party was on the ropes: when Bill Clinton won in 1992 and 1996; when Barack Obama won in 2008 and 2012; when the tea party launched in 2009; when Texas Senator Ted Cruz and company shut down the federal government for a few days in 2013.  (Remember when we were told that voters were going to "punish" Republicans in 2014? Yeah, that was right before they handed the GOP control of the House and Senate.)  When Donald Trump roared into the primaries in 2015 and knocked out his more — shall we say — traditional GOP rivals one by one, and even (perhaps especially) since Donald Trump's election, the media's go-to narrative has been how the Republican Party is fragmented and crumbling.  Now we know that it's the Democratic Party that's rotting from within.

Video on the Media Lies and Misinformation on Sutherland Springs Shooting.  Steven Crowder does a good job in dissecting the media's willful ignorance about the Sutherland Springs mass killing and citizen intervention.  [Video clip]

Gunfight, Home Invader Killed, Headline:  Victim Identified.  Many self defense shootings are not reported in the media.  Many are not entered as justified homicides in the FBI Uniform Crime Reports (UCR).  A self defense shooting, which included a justified homicide, occurred in the 800 block of Waugoo Avenue, in Oshkosh, Wisconsin,at night, on November 5th, 2017.  The initial reporting did not include any indication this was a justified self defense shooting.

The Actual 2016 FBI Report on "Russian Hacking" Does Not Show What Media Claim It Does.  Last year against the backdrop of President Obama's sanctions announcement against Russia, we closely reviewed the "Russian Malicious Cyber Activity — Joint Analysis Report".  This December 2016 intelligence report is the report where the media talking points "17 intelligence agencies agreed" and the Russian "hacking of the election" began.  The report was released to coincide with President Obama kicking out Russian diplomats as punishment for the content therein.  Everyone talks about this report, yet almost no-one talking about it has actually read it.

MSNBC Panel Falsely Claims Heroic Neighbor Didn't End Texas Shooter's Rampage.  On Tuesday's episode of Meet the Press Daily, panelist Yamiche Alcindor and host Chuck Todd incorrectly said Stephen Willeford did not exchange fire with the Texas church shooter or end his attack.  "When I was watching President Trump today, and he was making his argument that [the shooter] was essentially stopped by someone with a gun, I thought he killed himself," Yamiche Alicindor, a national reporter for the New York Times, said.  "There was not a big gun fight, and he was not stopped.  There needs to be a fact check on how it was stopped."  "Right," Chuck Todd responded.  "The narrative with Mike Huckabee and the president is a little bit off the rails."  The facts show that Stephen Willeford did exchange gunfire with the Texas gunman as his attack was still preceding.  The story of Farida Brown, as told to the Washington Post by her son David Brown, makes it clear that at least some of the survivors of the attack credit Willeford with saving their lives.

How Leftism Makes Us Stupid.  Perhaps the worst thing about having an exclusively leftist media is that it makes all of us, right and left, stupider.  Take for example that media's reaction to the latest Islamist terror attack in Manhattan.  Evil loser Sayfullo Saipov follows the ISIS playbook by driving a rented van over innocent civilians, killing eight.  He jumps out of the van shouting "Allahu Akbar!" (Allah is the greatest) and later tells police he's glad about what he did and requests an ISIS flag in his hospital room.  In reporting the event, CNN Crime and Justice reporter Shimon Prokupecz refused to share the police description of the killer after he was caught.  Because he's a journalist, and the last thing we want is to have journalists going around giving people information!  CNN's Jake Tapper responded to news of the loser's Arabic shout by remarking inanely that Allahu Akbar is "sometimes said under the most beautiful of circumstances, and too often we hear it being said in moments like this."  He later clarified that he was referring to beautiful circumstances like weddings and births.  Yeah, what if the guy had been waving a Confederate flag?  They wear those at some weddings too. [...] None of which is to make fun of a tragedy, of course, but only of the absurd reaction of the leftist press.

Two popular conservative Twitter personalities were just outed as Russian trolls.  Jenna Abrams was a popular figure in right-wing social media circles.  Boasting nearly 70,000 followers, Abrams was featured in numerous news articles during the 2016 election, spotlighted by outlets as varied as USA Today, the Washington Post, the BBC, and Yahoo!  Sports. [...] But Abrams never existed.  According to information released by House Democrats earlier this week, Abrams was one of more than 2,750 fake Twitter accounts created by employees at the Internet Research Agency, a "troll farm" funded by the Russian government based in St. Petersburg.

More Fake News From the New York Times.  The New York Times had two veteran reporters working overtime on Friday night after the representative of a respected conservative publication testified before the House Intelligence Committee.  Literally.  The piece by Kenneth P. Vogel and Maggie Haberman was posted at 7:32 pm on Friday night [10/27/2017].  It's brief and breathless.  And embarrassingly dishonest.  The Times is practiced to deceive.  It contorts language and chronology to present information in a way so as to not inform, to misinform.

Poll: Plurality Of Americans Believes Media Makes Up Stories About Trump.  On the one hand, it's an amazing testament to how far public trust in the media has fallen that more Americans than not believe they're publishing false stories about the president.  On the other hand, how is this number not 100 percent?  It's not a matter of opinion.  The media does, in fact, sometimes publish honest-to-goodness fake news about Trump and his orbit.

Media Dishonesty Gives Trump Legitimate Talking Points.  If you listen to the media today, you'd be hard pressed to know that President Trump both complying with the law and with a court decision.  The media would prefer to make this all about dismantling Obamacare and ignore the fact President Obama had no constitutional authority to do what he did.  When the President blasts fake news, this is what he is talking about and this gives his supporters ample room to ignore the President's more outlandish attacks against the press.

Reuters calls this smoke.
Trump EPA to propose repealing Obama's climate regulation: document.  The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency will propose repealing the Clean Power Plan — the Obama administration's centerpiece regulation to fight climate change — and plans to solicit input on a rule to replace it, according to an EPA document seen by Reuters.

The Editor says...
This article is accompanied by a photograph (left) which appears to be a photo of an industrial plant of some sort, with the dishonest caption, "Smoke is released into the sky at a refinery in Wilmington, California March 24, 2012."  The "smoke" being released is obviously water vapor, since it appears to be absorbed into the surrounding atmosphere within a few seconds of its release.  The contrast on the photo appears to have been enhanced to make the emission appear to be black as it leaves the vent, but smoke doesn't turn white and then disappear within a few seconds.  This appears to me to be a shamelessly dishonest attempt to make harmless vapor look like smoke.


Trump Fulfills Campaign Pledge on Contraception Mandate.  [Scroll down]  Today [10/6/2017], Trump made good on that pledge when his administration issued a new rule that will exempt organizations whose owners or shareholders harbor religious or moral objections to paying for certain types of birth control via health plans.  It goes without saying, of course, that this new rule is being grotesquely misrepresented by Obamacare apologists in the legacy "news" media.  The Washington Post, for example, reported the regulatory change under the following misleading headline:  "Trump administration narrows Affordable Care Act's contraception mandate."

Is Any Part Of The Russia Election Hacking Story True?  In June, Samuel Liles, the Department of Homeland Security's acting director of the Office of Intelligence and Analysis Cyber Division, told Congress that "the Russian government tried to hack election-related computer systems in 21 states."  Then, earlier this month, the election hacking story made headlines again when DHS officials notified state officials in 21 states about the attempts to breach their voter registration systems.  This sparked renewed outrage from Democrats about how the election results had been "hacked" by Russia.  But then the story started to fall apart, when Wisconsin and California said DHS was wrong about their systems being targeted.  California found that Russia hadn't scanned its Secretary of State website at all.

Facebook admits it promoted fake Vegas massacre stories.  Facebook admitted Monday [10/2/2017] that its system automatically promoted stories that falsely identified the shooter in the Las Vegas massacre.  The social network said links from websites such as The Gateway Pundit and others were posted and spread across their site Sunday night.  The stories claimed the shooter was an "anti-Trump" Democrat and displayed pictures of a man who is not identified as a suspect.

Don't Fall for Jimmy Kimmel's Cheap Zero-Sum Emotionalism.  In recent months, late-night talk show host Jimmy Kimmel has taken to scaremongering his audience with well-worn Democratic Party talking points regarding health care insurance policy.  Between yuks, he occasionally accuses Republicans of being would-be baby killers, which is treated as an important political development because, well, Jimmy Kimmel is famous.  This week, the comedian was back to explain why the new Graham-Cassidy Republican "repeal" bill is bad news.  There were only two things wrong with his monologue:  Almost everything he said was either completely untrue or highly misleading, and his simplistic emotional appeal was completely disconnected from the real world.

Horsepucky News Courtesy of Murdoch's Wall Street Journal.  Remember, there are trillions of dollars at stake and all of the vested financial interests, writ large, have positioned themselves to do anything possible to draw down the support for President Trump's 'America-First' agenda.  Don't kid yourselves or sell your intelligence short; it ain't about Donald Trump per se, the opposition is against the policies of President Donald Trump.  Trump's 'America-First' policies are adverse to the interests of multinational corporations and the multinational financial institutions who underwrite those corporations.

European Commissioner the Wall Street Journal Cited Says Story Entirely False.  European Commission's Miguel Arias Canete denies ever telling the Wall Street Journal that the U.S. was changing the Trump administration position on Paris Climate Treaty.

If the Media Doesn't Tell the Truth, What Use Is It?  Yesterday [8/30/2017], Jim Treacher at The Daily Caller posted a story:  "Bill And Hillary Clinton Finally Sell Hamptons Mansion."  Only one problem:  Bill and Hillary didn't actually own the mansion.  Follow the link, and you get to the real story:  the Hamptons mansion that Bill and Hillary have rented in the past has been on the market and under contract for two years, and the sale finally closed.  There are lots of things that you could say about this — like observing that it's cool how people who were flat broke in 2000 can afford $150,000 a month rent for a summer place — but you can't honestly say "the Clintons finally sell their mansion."  This is why God made the passive voice:  you write a headline like the Free Beacon did — "Clinton Hamptons 'Summer Vacation Rental' Sells For $29 Million."

Left-Wing Outlets Spread False Story Claiming GOP Official Turned Down Disaster Aid.  A number of left-wing outlets spread a false story claiming Texas Republican Secretary of State Rolando Pablos turned down aid in the wake of Hurricane Harvey, and instead requested prayers.  The story appears to have spread from one sentence in an article from Canada's CBC News.  The story referenced an offer from the Canadian province of Quebec to send Texas "equipment and crews to help restore power and to provide blankets, beds, pillows and hygienic products."

Media & Politicians Admitting They Lied About Russia.  It has been nearly three weeks since The Nation pushed an explosive memo from the Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity into mainstream consciousness with an article detailing the evidence that the DNC leaks last year could not have been the result of a Russian hack.  By continuing to ignore it, the US intelligence community and all the pundits and politicians who have advanced the Russian hacking narrative are tacitly admitting that they lied.

CNN's Republican Pundit Gave Thousands of Dollars to Dems, Including the Chairwoman of the DNC.  It turns out CNN's spokeswoman for Republicans is not as Republican as you might think.  Ana Navarro, who has been the perpetual presence as the "Republican" on many panels across the news spectrum, has donated thousands of dollars over the past two decades to some of the most controversial and partisan leaders of the Democratic Party, a new report finds.

It's time to chill the "free press".  Allowing Sarah Palin to continue her libel lawsuit against the New York Times "would chill expression by journalists who want to draw connections and inferences," Noah Feldman wrote in a column for Bloomberg News.  That is an excellent idea, because increasingly people in the press show a constant, malicious, and reckless disregard for the truth.  In 2011, Jared Lee Loughner killed a federal judge and five others, and severely wounded Democratic Congresswoman Gabby Giffords.  Democratic Party operatives spread the lie that a map targeting Giffords in the last election inspired the carnage.  However, Loughner did not vote in that election.  He is psychotic.  But the press keeps spreading this lie.

Field Report From The Left-Wing Violence in Arizona.  Today, the following morning, I open the Arizona Republic to see the headline "VIOLENCE ERUPTS!" with a picture of one sad [chump] on his knees in front of lines of police.  This apparently happened after the rally.  Wait, "VIOLENCE ERUPTS?"  No it didn't.  Nothing "erupted."  Protesters became violent.  There was no violence at all on the part of the Trump supporters.  None.  This is another example of fake news at its best, failing to even follow basic journalistic (and writing) rules of active voice in which a subject — the protesters — cause the action-eruption.  And the sad little Fake News media continues to whine about how it is treated.

Reuters deletes FALSE tweet mislabeling Antifa as 'peaceful protesters'.  Reuters had to delete a tweet that whitewashed the violence of the anti-Trump Antifa protesters when people noticed that they called them "peaceful protesters."

The media lies about the Boston rally.  The Boston rally was a watershed event.  But not in the way the mainstream media has been portraying it, as a bold stand against white supremacy in the wake of Charlottesville.  Rather, it demonstrates the power of propaganda to foment mass hysteria and mob rule.  Reality no longer matters.  For the media refuses to report this seminal truth:  There were no white supremacists or neo-Nazis.  None.  Not even one.  Instead, they engaged in a massive disinformation campaign that spurred over 40,000 "antifascists" to descend upon Boston Common.  The alt-left's goal: to counter-demonstrate against an alleged "white nationalist" rally.  Yet, what they were protesting was the very opposite.  The Free Speech rally had nothing to do with white supremacy or the Ku Klux Klan — never mind the violence in Charlottesville.

Colin Kaepernick — History's Hero?  The National Football League's preseason is underway, and national anthem-hating quarterback Colin Kaepernick still doesn't have an NFL job.  One can easily identify the liberal journalists by their anguish over this so-called injustice.  You can also identify them by their dishonest arguments.

The media couldn't be more blatant in distorting Trump's words on Charlottesville.  Has the media ever so deliberately and consistently misinterpreted what a president said?  It certainly seems as if the media finally found its proof that President Trump is a racist. [...] Does the press just think that no one will look at what Trump actually said?  For those who do look at the original interview and Trump's multiple, clear statements on the matter, the media risks losing what little credibility it still has.

'Freedom of the Press' Doesn't Mean What You Think.  Progressive propaganda, relying on misdirection, misinterpretation, and outright falsehoods, permeates American life and touches or taints every topic.  The corporations that produce mass entertainment and news, the government bureaucracies that shape and fund education, the schools from kindergarten to college, and the tech firms that control the flow of information and ideas, are all subject to a groupthink that, for all intents and purposes, brooks absolutely no dissent from Leftist dogma.

The Media Lied About The Leaked Google Memo.  If all you do is get your news from the establishment media, you'd be under the impression that former Google engineer James Damore is a dangerous bigot who hates women and minorities.  As reports of the so-called "anti-diversity" leaked memo from Google surfaced on the Internet, journalists exposed their preconceptions and bias with misleading headlines and equally biased stories.

Leftover Libels of Sebastian Gorka Served Up at Rolling Stone.  As Joel Pollak reports in Breitbart this morning [8/11/2017], Rolling Stone magazine has refried and repackaged the whole range of lies — comprehensively refuted — against White House adviser Sebastian Gorka.  The left-wing media keeps setting a new bar for chutzpah.  Central to the Stone story is an attempt to tar Dr. Gorka with guilt by association with right-wing political parties in Hungary, where he was active between 2000 and 2008.  "Gorka served as adviser to [Hungary's prime minister Viktor] Orbán," the article states, "who's been called a 'neo-fascist dictator' by Sen. John McCain."  As it happens, the left-wing Jewish news site The Forward offered this allegation in the form of a doctored tape of a 2006 Hungarian television interview with Dr. Gorka.  That brought the full interview to light — and the full interview shows Dr. Gorka denouncing Orbán for exploiting popular unrest for nefarious purposes.  Sebastian Gorka was not Orbán's "adviser," but a principled and uncompromising critic.

Rolling Stone Collects Every Lie About Sebastian Gorka in One Place.  Bob Dreyfuss's profile of White House aide Sebastian Gorka in Rolling Stone is an impressive feat of scholarship, compiling every lie about the former Breitbart News editor in one place.  It is a useful service for the ideologically addled and the functionally illiterate, who like their propaganda served straight-up, undiluted by the cold ice water of reality.  Students of cheap partisan smear jobs need look no further, for Rolling Stone has perfected the genre.  Dreyfuss does not seem to have done any original research, but recycles work done by other hacks — without, of course, bothering to provide his readers with any of the defenses that arose in their wake.

Scientists call out New York Times for incorrect claim about climate report.  Scientists appear to have debunked The New York Times' claim it was leaked a secret, gloomy climate change report which it published amid fears President Trump would suppress it.  On Monday [8/7/2017], The New York Times published a story saying there are concerns that the Trump administration could suppress what's known as the National Climate Assessment, a project of the U.S. Global Change Research Program.  The story, titled "Scientists fear Trump will dismiss blunt climate report," said the draft report "has not yet been made public" but "a copy of it was obtained by The New York Times."

Fake News A US Media Speciality.  All of the lies leading to the death of millions told by the criminal Clinton, George W. Bush, and Obama regimes were transparent.  The US media could easily have exposed them and saved the lives of millions of peoples [sic] and saved seven countries from destruction in whole or part.  But the presstitutes cheered on the gratuitous and criminal destruction of countries and peoples.

The Left is Already Preparing Tomorrow's Fake News.  The American Left has relied on its mastery of the media — enthusiastically aided and abetted by the 90% of national political journalists today that are progressives of one stripe or another — for its political power for decades.  Ever since the 1950s, the left has been deliberately creating events in order to attract media attention that pushes a narrative confirming the justice of their demands.  It learned that the new medium of television was perfect for creating artificial dramas that would sway support its way. [...] It has worked on issue after issue.  And here we are today with transgender bathrooms and other ornaments of the progressive worldview imposed on the public.

Democrats, ABC, NBC Attack Christian Non-Profit as an 'Anti-LGBT Hate Group'.  Last week, Democrats and two mainstream media outlets branded Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), a Christian legal nonprofit which has won seven Supreme Court cases in seven years, an "anti-LGBT hate group."  Worse, this "hate" designation comes from a terror-linked organization, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC).  ADF has demanded an apology and attacked this "media malpractice."  "Why is ABC and NBC willing to promote propaganda and cut and paste the Southern Poverty Law Center press release?" Kristen Waggoner, a senior vice president at ADF, asked Tucker Carlson on Fox News Friday night.  "Americans are losing trust in the media for this very reason."

The Southern Poverty Law Center Has Become a Dangerous Joke.  The Southern Poverty Law Center, the "civil rights watchdog group" that ABC and NBC so prominently cite, has become a dangerous joke.  It's a joke because the very idea that Christians are members of a "hate group" merely because they advocate for orthodox Christian principles and the liberty to live those principles is so intellectually and ideologically bankrupt that it's barely worth addressing.

The Left Media's Extraordinary Popular Delusions.  The Clinton campaign came up with their Trump-colluded-with-Russia meme about twenty-four hours after the election results were verified.  It was nonsense then as it is today, but the left's mental distress has become so grievous that they no longer can be called rational or even sane.  After eight months of wild speculation and various investigations, absolutely nothing has been unearthed that indicates in any way that the Trump campaign, least of all Trump himself, colluded with Russia to affect the outcome of the election. [...] The last eight and a half years have proven to the American people that the Democrat left and the media are two parts of the same criminal enterprise that feed each other's addiction to power.

Stupid Hostile Media.  President Donald Trump drives people crazy.  Especially those in the media.  They hate him so much, they leap on every anti-Trump rumor.  The Federalist's Jordyn Pair points out that the press repeatedly told us that a dozen Trump administration members were about to be fired, including Attorney General Jeff Sessions, Press Secretary Sean Spicer and strategists Steve Bannon and Jared Kushner.  Months later, all still work for or with the administration.

How to manufacture a scandal.  Another piece falls into place, of a mosaic in which Democrats set out in 2016 to create a false appearance of collusion between President Trump and Russia.  It's pretty devious.

The Media Perpetuated A Clinton Lie For 9 Months.  What It Means For The Russia Narrative.  When Hillary Clinton claimed "17 intelligence agencies" agree on Russian meddling in the third presidential debate, a host of media outlets including The New York Times rated the claim as 100 percent true.  Nine months later, those same outlets say the stat is obviously false, and there's been a "simple" explanation as to why all along.  A closer look at how the claim survived and thrived over those nine months reveals a startling lack of skepticism in the press when it comes to the Russia narrative.  The truth is the great majority of the 17 agencies that make up the U.S. intelligence community had nothing to do with the investigation and made no judgments about the matter.

The Washington Post Offers Up A Textbook Case Of Garbage, Biased Journalism.  One might be shocked back into a coma to learn James Hodgkinson was not an angry conservative, but instead was an angry Bernie Sanders supporting, Occupy Wall Street guy who favored watching Rachel Maddow on MSNBC, hated Donald Trump and who shot up a Republican congressional baseball practice, shooting Republicans, including Republican Representative Steve Scalise.  If the story were only about Romanik and didn't mention Hodginkson, it would be a run-of-the-mill profile about some local AM shock-jock and a pretty good one at that.  It is interesting to see the kind of influence local talk shows have just like local newspapers and local television news.  But what editor at the Washington Post allowed Holley to link Hodgkinson to a right-wing radio talk show host without even confirming he ever listened to the show?

Washington Post article linking Scalise shooter to conservative radio host sparks online outrage.  The Washington Post struck out with many on social media over an article that appears to blame a right-wing Illinois shock jock for the Virginia shooting rampage by a Trump-hating, Bernie Sanders volunteer who targeted Republicans during a baseball practice.  The lengthy piece takes aim at the foul-mouthed Bob Romanik, who spews invective on the AM dial from a studio in Belleville, Ill., shooter James Hodgkinson's hometown.  "What's the point of this?" Buzz Feed political reporter Katherine Miller asked on Twitter.  "The shooter hated Trump and there's no indication in the story he listened to this pro-Trump host."

Death spiral TV news lies to fool advertisers.  The Wall Street Journal just accused major television networks of using deception to goose ratings that include deliberately misspelling the names of the news shows.  Sounds like fraud to me.  Unlike their cable brethren, the broadcast newsers seem to be losing customers.  I say seem because we have no way of telling as they have so gamed the ratings system that no honest person can say how many people watch them.

In TV Ratings Game, Networks Try to Dissguys Bad Newz from Nielsen.  Boosting TV ratings is easy for networks that don't mind playing dumb.  In a game largely sanctioned by TV-ratings firm Nielsen, television networks try to hide their shows' poor performances on any given night by forgetting how to spell.  That explains the appearance of "NBC Nitely News," [...]

Polish president knocks 'fake news' over wife's Trump handshake.  Polish President Andrzej Duda ripped "fake news" reports that his wife snubbed President Trump for a handshake during Trump's visit to Poland on Thursday [7/6/2017].  In a tweet, Duda confirmed that both he and his wife shook hands with the president and urged his followers to "fight fake news" together.

Fake Ratings:  Networks Dishonestly Inflate Evening News Numbers...by Misspelling.  Now we know that advertisers and the public are being supplied fake ratings by the same broadcasters who so often deliver fake news.  A Thursday morning [7/6/2017] Wall Street Journal dispatch by Joe Flint reports that the broadcast networks routinely inflate their reported evening news audiences.  They hide low-performing evening audiences by — get this — "forgetting how to spell."  No wonder the networks are so obsessed with "hacking."  In the ratings game, what could be described as a form of it — modifying (the results generated by) "a computer program in a skillful or clever way" — has become a routine industry practice.

Fake News:  Journalists Invent 'Super Awkward' Handshake Snub of Trump.  In the latest example of fake news, journalists on Thursday hyperventilated about a dramatic snub of Donald Trump by Poland's first lady.  Agata Kornhauser-Duda, it seemed, refused to shake the hand of the President.  Except, that's not what happened.  Mere seconds after shaking Melania Trump's hand, Kornhauser-Duda and the President shared a warm embrace.

Mainstream Media Promotes Death & Mayhem While Accusing POTUS Trump Of "Inciting Violence".  President Trump re-tweeted an amusing CNN-WWF parody video that had him pummeling the fake news network and the liberal media is now losing their minds over it claiming the president is "inciting violence."  This is the same media that assisted in the cover-up of Obama-era scandals like Fast and Furious, the secret drone bombing program, the ISIS fiasco, dealings with Iran, the atrocities in Libya, Syria, and on and on and on.  And let us not forget this was the same media that actively encouraged the violence in Ferguson, Baltimore, Dallas etc.

NBC Decries Rise of Conservative Media for Creating Polarized Country, No Mention of MSNBC.  What NBC's Willie Geist spun as a rundown of the political echo chambers in America on Sunday Today [7/2/2017], quickly devolved into a condemnation of the rise of conservative media.  "Fake news is a favorite term, as you know, of President Trump.  What you consider real and fake in many cases has become a question of where you're sitting and who you're listening to," declared Geist at the start of the segment.  He ignored the fact that the term was first used to describe stories about Hillary Clinton during the 2016 election.

If the Media Wants to Win Back Public Trust, It Can Start Reporting Truthfully on Immigration.  [Scroll down]  A large reason there is such a gulf between what happens and what journalists report is that many journalists see themselves as "protectors of the truth," as illustrated by NBC News host Chuck Todd.  The truth is their truth, stemming from an ideology that does not permit any contradictions or contrasting points of view to get a fair hearing.  While some Americans may turn to media figures for affirmation of beliefs already deeply held, I wager most Americans don't turn to Chuck Todd, or any other media figure for "the truth." Instead, they want reporters to accurately report facts, such as what the director of ICE actually said about immigration law enforcement.  Instead, what we see from too many reporters is the insertion of their own deeply held beliefs in place of facts on the ground.  When a reporter refers to an illegal alien as an "undocumented immigrant" this is an attempt to deny the criminal act of illegal immigration.

TwitterAudit Reports CNN Has 17 Million Fake Twitter Followers.  Of CNN's millions of followers on their verified Twitter account, over 17 million or 48 percent are fake, according to TwitterAudit.  According to TwitterAudit, the site determines the quality and score of real and fake followers by taking "a sample of up to 5000 (or more, if you subscribe to Pro) Twitter followers for a user and calculates a score for each follower.  This score is based on number of tweets, date of the last tweet, and ratio of followers to friends."

Levin on CNN: They're Not a News Organization Anymore.  On his nationally syndicated radio show Tuesday [6/27/2017], host Mark Levin criticized CNN, saying the network has "sold out" and is "not a news organization anymore."  "CNN, in my view right now, is in a state of complete disintegration," said Mark Levin.  "It won't show up right away on their ratings, but it will eventually show up.  They truly do run with phony stories.  They have prostituted themselves.  They have sold out.  They are not a news organization anymore."  Levin's comments came after CNN published, then redacted a story linking a Trump surrogate to a Russian investment fund, prompting the resignation of three CNN employees.

A Brief History of 'Fake News'.  Disinformation is false information spread deliberately to deceive and cause chaos.  Ion Mihai Pacepa, the highest-ranking defector from the Soviet bloc explained in his book Disinformation that the ultimate measure of success for disinformation was when the major organs of the media coud be tricked into unknowingly propagating deliberate falsehoods.  But the Russians are far from the only ones practicing disinformation designed against political systems.  The current investigations of alleged "Russian collusion" on Capitol Hill are the result of a disinformation campaign that was begun by the Democratic Party and continued when the mainstream media were fooled into publicizing the accusations as fact. [...] Disinformation only works if people refuse to think or find it easier not to.  I ask all to please think about what is being laid in front of you and see if it makes sense.

Mediaite Tried So Hard To Make A Black Intern Look Like A White Supremacist.  The congressional intern Mediaite cast as a white supremacist Wednesday [6/21/2017] is actually black, The Daily Caller News Foundation has learned.  Nate Washington is a black conservative attending Western Kentucky University and is a former intern of Republican Sen. Tom Cotton.

The Incomplete Media Narrative about a Murdered Muslim Girl.  "Muslim Teen Kidnapped and Brutally Murdered in Virginia:  This Is Terrorism" read a headline from Affinity magazine.  Actress and producer Mindy Kaling also decried the murder on Facebook as "another innocent Muslim person targeted for their faith."  The Atlantic then ran a profile, "'Muslims Feel Under Siege'" highlighting Islamophobia around Ramadan.  Many stories used Hassanen's murder as a lede to foray into a greater narrative about the collective crisis of violence against Muslims.  But then actual facts and details around the case emerged.  First, the Fairfax County Police Department publicly ruled out a hate crime as a motive, announcing that they were looking more closely into extreme road rage.  Then, the Daily Caller reported that the murderer, Darwin Martinez Torres, was an illegal immigrant from El Salvador, with ICE confirming that it had issued a detainer request against him.  Reports subsequently emerged that Torres, who has a girlfriend and son, barely speaks English and required the use of a translator following his arrest.

Democrats are incapable of learning from Georgia Special Election loss.  As I often do on election nights when Democratic disappointment is likely to be highest, I watched MSNBC.  First I watched Rachel Maddow, then Lawrence O'Donnell.  The MSNBC coverage was nothing short of delusional.  The "a loss is really a win" approach was pervasive.  Hope sprang eternal.  Maddow in particular continued to spin Trump Russia conspiracy theories.  O'Donnell went on and on about how the Republican healthcare bill would be the doom of Republicans.  A phrase used frequently on O'Donnell's show was that this was an "ominous win" for Republicans because the margin was lower than when Tom Price won — ignoring that the Republican outperformed Trump's win.

James T. Hodgkinson:  Just Another Well-Intentioned Progressive.  Have you followed the drift of the Mainstream Media (MSM) as to what provoked James T. Hodgkinson to attempt the massacre of the Republican baseball team as it practiced in Alexandria, Virginia last week?  Not the Democratic team, not the Washington Nationals team, but the Republican team.  Well, it was not necessarily Hodgkinson's politics we are told.  After all, his politics were pretty much mainstream progressive.  According to the MSM, it was "a Volatile Home Life in Illinois."  That is the way the New York Times put it on the newspaper's front page Sunday [6/18/2017].  Strong drink was alluded to.  Anger and violence were also mentioned as features in Hodgkinson's rural Illinois home. [...] Yet as I say the MSM is soft-pedaling this lunatic's politics, and I can see why.  There was nothing particularly unusual about them.

Journalism is dead; whatever these guys are doing isn't journalism.  What do all of these stories have in common?  They're completely unsourced.  No names.  No real people.  Just claims that come from, in order, "two administration officials and three outside advisers familiar with the matter," an anonymous tweeter who set up a dummy Twitter account, and "a Downing Street adviser."  None of the latest stories have anyone on the record making the accusations.  Instead, the "news" sites that posted the stories — Politico, the Daily Mail and the Guardian — simply make the surprising claims and cite anonymous sources.  The subjects of the anonymous slurs have no recourse whatsoever, no right to face their accusers, no way to fight back.  The accusation streams out onto the internet, where it lives forever — whether it's true or not.

Nets Blackout the Radical Leftist History of NSA Leaker Reality Winner.  Not long after top-secret documents from the National Security Agency made their way onto the internet news site The Intercept on Monday, the Justice Department arrested NSA contractor Reality Winners.  The 25-year-old veteran worked on a military base in Georgia, but online she had a long history of being heavily Anti-Trump, an apparent social justice warrior, and a supporter of Iran over the U.S. During their evening broadcasts, the Big Three Networks (ABC, CBS, and NBC) either played down her political attitudes, or outright ignored them as they reported on what she did.  During his report on NBC Nightly News, Justice Correspondent Pete Williams passed along her family's claim that "she wasn't highly political," and Anchor Lester Holt claimed her "motive is a mystery."  But in reality, Winner was anything but silent about her political views.

From Fake News to Fake Polls.  The media blob is making much of a Washington Post/ABC News poll that finds the public by a 2 to 1 margin opposes President Trump's decision to withdraw from the Paris Accord: [...] You need to click through to the actual poll questions to see what [an incompetent] poll it is.  The poll only asked five questions. [...] Conspicuously missing are any questions about whether people support appropriations for wealth transfers from the U.S to developing nations that the Paris Accord included (and into which Obama tossed $1 billion)?  No questions, also, about whether people are willing to pay higher energy costs for an agreement that will make no difference to the planet's temperature 80 years from now, according to the EPA's own models.

Examples of fake news?  How much time you got?  White House press secretary Sean Spicer finally lost it this week trying to correct the endless torrent of bogus news stories being churned out daily by the alt-left media. [...] Spicer had been lecturing the press corps about all their "anonymous sources" and the fictionalized stories "that are absolutely false ... narratives that are wrong ... fake news."  He was directing his remarks at a reporter from the Associated Press — you know, the organization that falsely reported in February that Trump was planning to use "100,000 National Guard troops" to round up "millions" of illegal aliens.  "When you see stories get perpetrated that are absolutely false," Spicer told the crack AP scribe, "that is troubling, and he (the president) is rightly concerned."  So a Democrat operative from the Clinton News Network asked Spicer for an example.

Heroin dealers deserve prison, not sympathy.  The deadly poison that is heroin made its way to your small town from Mexico, where it was grown and processed, later to be trafficked to your neighborhood where its target customers were someone's children, parents, brothers and sisters.  But right now, when you open the newspaper or turn on the television, you learn that the person that brought the drugs into your neighborhood, which ultimately made their way to your child, is considered by many in both the media and the public to be a "non-violent, low-level drug offender."

NYT's Jonathan Martin Steals Photo From Another Journalist, Lies About Where He Got ItThe New York Times has been holding up the torch for truth in the age of fake news and alternative facts — but one of its political reporters, Jonathan Martin, has no qualms in weaving a few alternative facts of his own.  After he lifted a photograph from another journalist and presented it without attribution, Martin doubled down on his lie and claimed he had no idea it was the other journalist's photo.

The CIA and the MSM: 50 Facts the World Needs to Know.  Since the end of World War Two the Central Intelligence Agency has been a major force in US and foreign news media, exerting considerable influence over what the public sees, hears and reads on a regular basis.  CIA publicists and journalists alike will assert they have few, if any, relationships, yet the seldom acknowledged history of their intimate collaboration indicates a far different story — indeed, one that media historians are reluctant to examine.

NYT's Comey Memo Story Doesn't Pass Smell TestThe New York Times reported on Tuesday that President Trump allegedly asked former FBI Director James Comey to shut down the investigation into former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn.  The source of the allegation is a memorandum, revealed by an anonymous source, allegedly prepared by Comey regarding a meeting in the Oval Office the day after Flynn was forced to resign for misleading the Vice-President.  While the headline is sensational, The New York Times's report is self-contradictory at times, conflicts with statements made on-the-record and under oath, overhypes the substance of the memorandum, and is irreconcilable with other information in the public record.

Eight Lies the MSM Told About Comey Firing.  Over the last week or so the media has breathlessly reported on every little whisper that has escaped from Washington, D.C. and for the most part — much of what they've told us has been wrong.  Sadly, this is a common refrain from today's media who can't seem to get out of their own way and constantly seem to be tripping over their own failures and falsehoods.  It's almost as if the media has an agenda that they are trying to promote and they are willing to sacrifice their reputation if it means pushing that agenda forward.  In their attempts to use the Comey story to undermine the Trump administration they've sacrificed every iota of reputation and been unmasked as the biased hypocrites we've always suspected them to be.

The Media Finally Admit Obamacare Is Collapsing.  [Scroll down]  If Obamacare had actually been "working" for all those years, it would not have suddenly collapsed.  In reality, the implosion of the "Affordable Care Act" began when it was originally implemented.  Moreover, the partisan reporters and editors of the legacy media certainly knew it was a disaster by 2013, when more than five million Americans lost their insurance coverage and Healthcare.gov exploded on the launch pad.  They could not, however, report the truth, because there was no plausible way to blame its failure on the Republicans.

Trump Is Not Shutting Down the EPA's Data Service.  A contractor for the Environmental Protection Agency who was "devastated" by Hillary Clinton's election loss was the source for a false story stating that the agency is shutting down its climate data service.  The EPA's Open Data service, where users can look up EPA facilities in their area and view pollution graphs, will continue to operate, despite several news reports to the contrary.  Bernadette Hyland, a contractor who has access to the Open Data website, was quoted in several publications, including the Independent, which falsely claimed "Donald Trump is to completely shut down one of the government's most important data services."

Media Lies Exposed:  Antifa Thug Girl Was Using Glass Bottles as Weapons Before Punch.  As many of you readers will recall, we've been all over the antifa girl who got rocked at the Berkeley protests this past weekend.  We had her fake name (Louise Rosealma) listed in the big article, but her real name is Emily Rose Marshall.  Every since she got smacked, the media has been working overtime to make this little terrorist into some kind of martyr.  Virtue signallers like Raheem Kassam and Brandon Darby, people who this publication normally respects, have been crying about never hitting a woman, under any circumstances.  The latter camp is [mistaken] on this issue, but the media is outright malicious.

CNN's Fareed Zakaria:  Were Obama Still President, He Would Have Ordered "Similar If Not Identical" Strike In Syria.  CNN's Fareed Zakaria discusses his experience with "Trump derangement syndrome," where people's hatred and anger towards the president is so intense that it impairs their judgment.  He talks about Obama speechwriters attacking Trump for doing exactly what President Obama would have done in Syria.

Republican wins.  NYT declares victory for Democrats.  From the Washington Examiner:  "Republican Kansas State Treasurer Ron Estes defeated Democrat James Thompson and Libertarian Chris Rockhold Tuesday night [4/11/2017] to keep the state's 4th congressional district in GOP hands."  Republican Estes 52.5%, Democrat Thompson 45.7%.  A 6.8-point win.  Ho-hum.  But Nate Cohn of the New York Times — who gave Hillary an 85% chance of winning on Election Day — sees this as a victory for the Democratic Party.

Washington Post Blogger Issues Official Apology for Spreading False Jeff Sessions Story.  A Washington Post blogger responsible for launching a false story about Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Tuesday published an official apology Wednesday [4/12/2017].  Tufts professor and Washington Post blogger Daniel Drezner helped kickstart the narrative that Sessions had referred to illegal immigrants as "filth" while delivering a speech before border agents at the U.S.-Mexico border.  Drezner took a quote from Sessions' prepared remarks out of context, and released his frustrations on Twitter.

Fact Check:  Fresno Bee Lies About Professor's Call To Kill Trump.  There's a lot of talk about a post-truth society these days.  A post-truth society kicks in when there is no respect for even the most blatantly obvious facts.  Professor Lars Maischak, who teaches, among other things, Marx and Hegel, at California State University, Fresno, tweeted, calls to kill Trump and Republicans.  [Tweets]  Could the media possibly defend and whitewash this?  Do you even need to ask.  No leftist can do anything too terrible for the media to defend.

The 10 Questions Andrea Mitchell Didn't Ask Susan Rice.  Here are a few thoughts about Andrea Mitchell's interview with Susan Rice — and the key questions that were left unasked.  Rice opened the interview by saying, "The allegation is that somehow Obama administration officials utilized intelligence for political purposes.  That's absolutely false."  On the contrary, the allegation is absolutely true — and demonstrating its truth is as easy as unmasking an American citizen in an NSA intercept.

The Fake News Crisis.  Within living memory, in 1968, the Democratic Party had its convention in Chicago, Hubert Humphrey was their nominee, and there were riots in the streets. [...] There is one huge difference between what is happening now, and what happened back then.  In 1968, there was a culmination of real events that actually affected America.  In 2017, there are no real events causing this, just narratives made up from nothing by a leftist media that is more divorced from reality than anyone thought possible.
  •   The Russians colluded with Trump.
  •   Trump is Hitler. Stupid. And evil.
  •   Obama was wonderful, transparent, brilliant, perfect, and fully competent.
  •   Trump's tax returns will show he is unfit.
  •   He is a racist that wants to ban all Muslims.
  •   Kellyanne Conway is a ditzy uninformed waste of a woman.
  •   Hillary Clinton is a pure and honest heroine fighting for good.
Virtually 24/7, these and other very unreal narratives are being played to the American public by our pathetic left wing media.  In 1968, the news had a reality component.  Yes, there was liberal bias in the news, but at least the events happened.

Washington Post Lies About Lawmaker's Biblical Reference, Then Refuses To Quote A Single Word He Said.  After the presidential election last November, New York Times executive editor Dean Baquet gave an interview to NPR in which he admitted that his journalists simply don't understand religion.  "We don't get religion," Baquet said.  "We don't get the role of religion in people's lives."  Baquet was correct:  Acela corridor political reporters don't understand religion, especially Christianity.  Though he was specifically speaking about New York Times reporters, Baquet's comments clearly also apply to the Washington Post, which on Friday morning accused a Republican congressman from Texas of claiming that the Bible forbids the unemployed from having food to eat.

WaPo Caught Red Handed In Big Lie, Tries To Quietly Overhaul Entire Piece.  Caitlin Dewey's initial write-up in the paper (which recently adopted the slogan "Democracy Dies In Darkness") did not include a single quote from the Texas representative she basically accused of using the Bible to justify taking food from starving people.  The story also incorrectly referred to "2 Thessalonians 3-10," and wildly mischaracterized Rep. Jody Arrington's statements on the verse.  While Arrington did reference 2 Thessalonians 3:10 (The one who is unwilling to work shall not eat) in a discussion of food stamps, he did not, as The WaPo article suggested, use it to argue unemployed people should not be allowed to eat.

The New York Times' ongoing dishonesty only helps Trump.  Six months ago, I canceled my subscription to the New York Times because I felt the paper had become ethically challenged in its coverage of the presidential election.  And, it turns out, I was right.

Media Tries and Fails to Re-invent Ferguson Thug Michael Brown as Victim with Meaningless 'New' Video.  In yet another attempt to turn Ferguson thug Michael Brown into a victim, a new "documentary" filmmaker released a segment of film showing Brown inside the market he was thought to have robbed just before he was shot and killed by a local policeman back in 2014.  The filmmaker claimed that is "proved" Brown did not rob the store.  But in only a day the whole claim unsurprisingly fell apart.  A segment of film showing 18-year-old Michael Brown in the Ferguson quick-mart was released late last week by documentary film maker Jason Pollock.  The filmmaker insisted that the video "proved" that Brown could not have robbed the market on the day he was killed resisting arrest a few blocks away.  The snippet of footage appears in Pollock's new movie entitled Stranger Fruit.

The Meals On Wheels Lie Keeps Rolling Along.  Let's start with a basic fact.  Contrary to news reports last week, President Trump is not eliminating funding for Meals on Wheels.  He's not even cutting it.  How do we know this?  Meals on Wheels says so.  A statement issued by Meals on Wheels America on Thursday notes that 35% of the revenues at the 5,000 or so local Meals on Wheels programs come via the Older Americans Act Nutrition Program.  Trump's budget outline says nothing about this program whatsoever.

Outrage on Wheels.  It made for great copy — irresistibly clickable and compulsively shareable.  "Trump's Budget Would Kill a Program That Feeds 2.4 Million Senior Citizens," blared Time's headline.  "Trump Proposed Budget Eliminates Funds for Meals on Wheels," claimed The Hill, in a piece that got 26,000 shares.  But it was false.  And it wouldn't have taken long for reporters to find and provide some needed context to the relationship between federal block grant programs, specifically Community Development Block Grants (CDBG), and the popular Meals on Wheels program.

The ancient laws of unintended consequences.  Fake news now serves as a sort of linguistic canary to remind the public that it is customarily saturated with a lethal gas of media disinformation.  Thus "fake news" seemed a proper if belated summation and clarification of years of liberal bias in the media that were supposed to be our custodian of the truth.  Were NBC anchor Brian Williams's fantasies fake news?  Were Dan Rather's "fake but accurate" Rathergate memos?  How about the party line circulated in JournoList or the Washington and New York reporters who colluded to massage the news to favor the Clinton campaign, as revealed in the Podesta WikiLeaks trove?  Was jailing a video maker part of an Obama-administration fake-news attempt to blame Benghazi deaths on a spontaneous riot?  Was the Iran Deal's "echo chamber," about which Ben Rhodes later bragged, the epitome of fake news?

Washington Post employee posed as ICE agent, police say.  A Washington Post employee was arrested last month and charged with impersonating an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent following an FBI raid, court documents show.  Itai Ozderman, 35, is accused of impersonating an ICE officer throughout Falls Church, Va., on more than one occasion, according to Montgomery County District Court documents.  Police say that he sported a bulletproof vest bearing the ICE logo and, when the FBI entered his home in Maryland bearing a search warrant, they discovered 10 weapons, including two M4-style assault rifles and a shotgun.  They also found body armor and tactical vests.

Presidential Payback For Media Hubris.  In just his first month in office, reporters have alread peddled dozens of fake news stories designed to discredit the President — to such a degree that little the now write or say can be taken at face value.
  •   No, Trump did not have an plans to invade Mexico, as Buzzfeed and the Associated Press alleged.
  •   No, Trump's father did not run for Mayor of New York by peddling racist television ads, as reported by Sidne Blumenthal.
  •   No, there were not mass resignations at the State Department in protest of its new leaders, as was reported by the Washington Post.
  •   No, Trump's attorney did not cut a deal with the Russians in Prague.  Nor did Trump indulge in sexual escapades in Moscow.  Buzzfeed again peddled those fake news stories.
  •   No, a supposedly racist Trump did not remove the bust of Martin Luther King Jr. from the White House, as a Time Magazine reporter claimed.
  •   No, election results in three states were not altered by hackers or computer criminals to give Trump the election, as implied by New York Magazine.
  •   No, Michael Flynn did not tweet that he was a scapegoat.  That was a media fantasy endorsed by Nanc Pelosi.
In fact, Daniel Payne of the Federalist has compiled a length list of sensational stories about Trump's supposed buffooneries, mistakes, and crudities that all proved either outright lies or were gross exaggerations and distortions.

How illegal immigrant advocates demonize Trump and terrify people.  The New York Times describes 11 million people — those who are living in the country illegally — as sleepless with anxiety, waiting for the "fists pounding on the door, the agents in black, the van ride, the cell."  Who has thrown such fear into this community?  How about the Left, aided and abetted by the liberal media, which has purposefully distorted President Trump's immigration policies, characterizing them erroneously as a radical departure from past practices?  In a feverish blast to donors sent out yesterday [2/22/2017], the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee claims that "Donald Trump plans to add thousands of immigration agents and begin deporting "almost all" undocumented immigrants."  That is, excuse the expression, fake news.  Trump is doing no such thing.

How to Tell if News Is Really News.  Wake up, America!  You're being had.  Start asking the right questions.  How did the Democrats come up with that 40,000,000 uninsured Americans to pass Obamacare?  When CNN's Don Lemon asks his panel about how much the Trump family's secret service is costing taxpayers, ask him where's his research and why didn't he question that about Michele Obama's huge entourage when she traveled?

Reporting? Liberal Media Have Much More in Mind Than That.  On Nov. 6, Daily Beast feature writer Justin Glawe pounced on news that a historically black church had been burned down with the words, "Vote Trump" spray-painted on the "charred remains."  Glawe acknowledged that he did not know who had committed the arson, writing that it was "now up to authorities to find out."  Nevertheless, he went on to tie the act into what he termed "the string of violence [by Trump supporters] against minorities this election season."  When in December it was revealed that a black church member with a criminal record had burned the church down, the Beast merely tacked on an editor's note to the original article and Glawe penned a follow-up piece in which he noted the arrested man had "liked" Donald Trump on Facebook.

Fake News:  Trump Never Said There Was A 'Terror Attack' Last Night In Sweden.  President Trump never said there was a "terror attack" last night [2/18/2017] in Sweden, but that didn't stop hundreds of fake news outlets from claiming he did.  During his rally Saturday, Trump said:  "Here's the bottom line, we've got to keep our country safe.  You look at what's happening.  We've got to keep our country safe.  You look at what's happening in Germany, you look at what's happening last night in Sweden.  Sweden, who would believe this.  Sweden.  They took in large numbers.  They're having problems like they never thought possible.  You look at what's happening in Brussels, you look at what's happening all over the world.  Take a look at Nice, take a look at Paris."  Nowhere did he say there was a "terror attack."  He said "look at what's happening."

Rev. Graham:  Trump Says 'What We All Know ... News Media Has Been Lying' — 'Fake News'.  Rev. Franklin Graham said President Donald Trump is correct about the news media today, that they lie and create "fake news," and added that the media should do what the Bible instructs, "You shall not circulate a false report" (Exodus 23:1).  "President Donald J. Trump has been saying what we all know — that the news media has been lying," said Rev. Graham in a Feb. 19 post on Facebook.  "In today's terminology, creating fake news."

No, Trump Never Said There Was A Terrorist Attack In Sweden.  This weekend the media was awash with stories suggesting that President Donald Trump claimed that a terrorist attack had recently occurred in Sweden during his speech at Saturday's [2/18/2017] rally in Melbourne, Florida.  Left-wing outlets ran numerous headlines and reports about Trump's statement, and the story was even a top trending item on Facebook:

Fake News Rap Sheet:  Last Week the MSM Was Caught Telling FORTY Lies.  Welcome to week three of "This Week In Fake News!" [...] You will see one change in this week's list, with respect to the count.  Rather than start the count over every week, this ongoing diary of Fake News will now use a cumulative number, an ongoing count.  Put simply, last week's list contained 24 pieces of Fake News.  The week prior was 12.  That is a total of 36, so this week we will start with number 37.  This is not meant to be a gimmick.  Rather, it is a way to more accurately understand and comprehend the breathtaking scope of the national media's rabid dishonesty.

It's Not Fake News, It's Lying, Leftist, Political Propaganda.  [I]t wasn't until the press began telling bold-faced lies intended to undermine and harm the candidacy of Donald Trump that it occurred to me that the press was telling outright lies, intentionally and with malice, in an attempt to defeat my candidate, Donald Trump, in his run for the presidency.  And after he became President the untrue stories got even more outlandish and more frequent and forceful as the leftist press attempted to destroy President Trump's administration before it could get off the ground.  At this point President Trump began putting a name to it, and it began to resonate with everyone how fabricated liberal news is.

The Crisis in Journalism Is Here.  It's getting harder and harder to kick in the needed amnesia to believe anything that comes from the media.

The Media's Jihad Against the Trump White House Staff.  [Scroll down]  The elephant in the room in these stories about the Trump White House staff is not just that the liberal media can't stand the new president — it can't abide his agenda.  And watching one executive order after another pour out of the Trump White House that is at a 180-degree variance with the Obama-era and all things far Left, the media reflexively zeroes in on the Trump staff.  Thus the stories.  Steve Bannon is really the president.  Or, according to Time magazine, which has put him on the cover, he is "The Great Manipulator" of the President.  And he's a white supremacist.  Not to mention he's anti-Semitic.  Oh, and by the way, he's incompetent too.  Kellyanne Conway ignored Ethics Rules 101.  She has no integrity and she went out of her way to make the rich Ivanka even richer using her public position.  And so it goes through the list.  Does this not mean that at any given moment President Trump may in fact have a genuine problem with one of his staffers?  Of course not.

Jeffrey Toobin Catching On — President Trump's Executive Order Wins by Losing.  There are two ways you can tell when moonbats are losing, one is subtle the other is obvious.  A subtle indicator is how the entire MSM apparatus switched (literally overnight on Thursday [2/10/2017]) from calling President Trump's executive order a "Muslim ban" to calling it a "Travel Ban".

Fact Check: Obama Is Not Good at Kite Surfing, Any Sport.  A glowing report in the Washington Post claiming former President Barack Obama is "pretty much a natural on a kiteboard" is filled with factual errors, according to a Washington Free Beacon fact check.  "Obama makes rest of us look bad with his effortless kitesurfing," the headline for a piece by Kelyn Soong reads.  Soong "works in the sports department" at the Washington Post and writes about tennis and running. [...] "Turns out that was just the beginning of Obama's post-presidency adventures," Soong wrote, explaining that Branson challenged Obama to see who could stay on a kiteboard or foilboard the longest.  "It's well documented that Obama is pretty good at basketball, but the video proved that the 55-year-old former leader of the free world is pretty much a natural on a kiteboard, as well," Soong wrote.  These claims are false.  As the video reveals Obama fell multiple times off the kiteboard despite "perfect conditions" and practicing for "two days solid" before the challenge.

New York Times:  Our Readers Are Too Dumb To Understand Global Warming Numbers.  I recently wrote about the wretched reporting on the claim that 2016 was the "hottest year on record," using as my main example a New York Times article by Justin Gillis that gave his readers none of the relevant numbers they could use to evaluate that claim.  None of them.  If you search for the actual numbers, you will eventually find that the effect they are claiming, the actual amount by which this year was hotter than previous years, is smaller than the margin of error in the data.  Shortly afterward, I got a revealing response from Gillis.  I'll fill in all the details for you, because the whole thing is an important case study in why you can't trust mainstream reporting on global warming.

2 Minutes of Mainstream Media Backtracking Really Put 'Fake News' Into Perspective.  Since Trump's election, numerous mainstream outlets have propagated rumors or falsehoods before being forced to peddle them back.

Here's A List Of Stories The Media Got Wrong This Week.  It was an embarrassing week for the mainstream media.  In case after case, stories pushed by news outlets turned out to be either unsubstantiated or fell apart upon closer scrutiny.

20 'Vetted' Refugees Who Turned to Terrorism After Being Allowed Into America.  While the lying media is perpetuating the lie refugees do not pose a terrorist threat, the facts show otherwise.  Senator and soon-to-be Attorney General Jeff Sessions compiled this list of refugees-turned-jihadists in 2016 while Obama was pushing to dramatically increase the amount of so-called "refugees" allowed into the United States.

Brzezinski: Trump Won EV 'Fair and Square' — But He's Not 'Completely Elected By the People'.  On Friday's [1/28/2017] broadcast of MSNBC's "Morning Joe," co-anchor Mika Brzezinski argued that while President Donald Trump won the Electoral vote fairly, "this is a president who lost to Hillary Clinton... I think there's a lot of support he still needs to gain.  It's not a president completely elected by the people."

President Trump Should Dump The Media.  Trust ratings and approval levels for the media are so far down in the toilet that it would take a plumber to find them.  If the media are the people's representatives, then the people want to elect different ones.  Those are some of the same representatives that the media is trying to ban from social media with a fake "Fake News Crusade" and by resisting any expansion of press briefings with threats and warnings.  "We'll have to consider doing things other than protesting and whining," Fournier threatened.  "We'll have to think about what we can do to bring some pain to make our point."  Do what?  Run items accusing President Trump of being a traitor, a liar, a racist, a rapist and a Batman villain?  The media has already done all of those.  What else is it going to except shout more lies even louder?  Within a brief span of time, the media's fake news operation claimed that Trump had banished the bust of MLK, lifted quotes from a Batman villain and had been cavorting with Russian prostitutes.  And that he was a compulsive liar.  That last accusation is notably hilarious considering the honesty and integrity of the media.

Three Mainstream Media Lies on Trump's First Day.  The mainstream media lost no time in attempting to undermine President Donald Trump, as opposed to actually reporting information.  After eight years of kowtowing to Obama, they have suddenly discovered a civic responsibility to hold the government accountable.  But they are focusing on minutiae, and in some cases actually telling lies, both of omission and commission.  That risks alienating the public even further — making it harder, actually, for the media to act as watchdogs.

MSM reporter falsely claimed that Trump had MLK bust removed from Oval Office.  Sure everybody makes mistakes, but making a sensational false charge against a new president at the very first opportunity he allowed reporters into his Oval Office on Day One of his presidency sure looks like one of those narrative-confirming, "too-good-to-check" stories of journalistic lore that just happens to portray Trump as a racist "white nationalist" in the eyes of progressives.  Zeke Miller of Time was allowed into the Oval Office as a pool reporter and tweeted out reports that the Churchill bust was back (true) and the MLK bust was gone (false).

Why NYT Hid The Numbers For The 'Hottest Year On Record'.  [W]hen you read an article proclaiming that, for the third year in a row, last year was the hottest year on record, you might expect that right up front you will get numbers, measurements, and a statistical margin of error. [...] I just got done combing through a New York Times report titled, "Earth Sets a Temperature Record for the Third Straight Year."  The number of relevant numbers in this article is:  zero.  We are not told what the average global temperature was, how much higher this is than last year's record or any previous records, or what the margin of error is supposed to be on those measurements.  Instead, we get stuff like this. [...]

Atlanta Journal-Constitution Botches Crime Stats in Defending John Lewis.  On Friday, Georgia Congressman John Lewis, whose 5th District includes the City of Atlanta, said of Donald Trump that "I don't see the president-elect as a legitimate president."  Trump characteristically fired back with a two-part tweet suggesting that Lewis "... spend more time on fixing and helping his district, which is in horrible shape and falling apart (not to mention crime infested) rather than falsely complaining about the election results."  As would be expected, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution rushed to Lewis's defense.  In its apparent haste to do so, a pair of journalists at the paper committed a colossal math blunder vastly understating the city's crime rate.  With that mistake, the paper made the city look over 13 times safer than it really is.

Fake News About the Office of Congressional Ethics.  The mainstream media are abuzz with claims that House Republicans have voted to "gut" or "eviscerate" the Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE), or to strip it of its independence.  Perpetual House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) claimed Republicans had "eliminated" the oversight body, and linked the move to President-elect Donald Trump, claiming that the House Republicans' move represents a violation of Trump's campaign promise to "drain the swamp" in Washington.  The story qualifies as "fake news," and the fact that it is being repeated by so many outlets does not make the it any less fake.

BBC Finally Admits Its Famous 'Women Write Better Code' Story Was Fake News.  When the issue of "fake news" came to prominence at the end of this year's election cycle, traditional media outlets were the firsts to engage in relentless finger-pointing.  Journalists everywhere deplored the spread of misleading, lazily reported and, in some cases, totally fabricated stories that had been facilitated by social media.  That'd be ignoring — of course — that in a competitive media climate where virality and accuracy go head-to-head, editors will often go for a catchier headline, at the expense of factual accuracy.  And as one writer at HEqual noted, even the respectable BBC is not immune from this kind of sensationalism.

Top Ten Most Under Reported Stories of 2016.  [#2] The wipe-out of the corporate media apparatus:  It is understandable why the media would choose not to report on their own irrelevance; yet that doesn't mean their irrelevance is any less a story.  Arguably you could make the complete collapse of the U.S. corporate and legacy media the #1 story of this entire election cycle.  Never before has any single political election so thoroughly, completely and visibly destroyed the credibility of print or broadcast journalism.  Collectively and individually they will never recover from the continual abject and transparent falsehoods they promoted in each and every hour of their coverage, and in almost every column inch of their publications.  Put a fork in them, they are all done — and they did it to themselves, repeatedly.

Fake News:  Family Didn't 'Flee Town' over Breitbart Story That Doesn't Mention Them.  If you read through the world of left-wing clickbait Thursday afternoon [12/22/2016], you may have seen a shocking story about a Jewish family chased out of town by anti-Semitic Breitbart readers because our site blamed them for shutting down a school's Christmas play.  Scary stuff — except that version of the story is 100% fake news.

ADL: 'No truth' to story about Jewish family fleeing Pa. over Christmas play.  The Anti-Defamation League said Thursday that a widely circulated story that a Pennsylvania Jewish family fled their home after being blamed for the cancellation of a school Christmas play was false.  After investigating, the ADL said, it found the family had gone on vacation.  "News reports alleging that a Jewish family has 'fled' Lancaster County are untrue and damaging," ADL Regional Director Nancy Baron-Baer said in a statement.  "We spoke with the family, who explained that they went on a previously-planned vacation for the holidays.  Stories like this can sow fear in the Jewish community and beyond, and it is important to stop the spread of misinformation."

Kurt Eichenwald Further Explains His Claim That Trump Was Institutionalized.  [Scroll down]  So:  Eichenwald was making a joke, and "signalling to a source," but he also really believes that Trump was institutionalized in 1990.  The problem is that he can't prove it — it's merely "reporting process" — so he hasn't said so publicly.  Except for when he did say so publicly, but that doesn't count because he really doesn't like Tucker Carlson.  Now we know.  If Eichenwald genuinely believes that Tucker prevented him from explaining all of this on the air, then I'm glad to help make things right.

NBC's Chuck Todd Wonders If GOP Provoked Hacking from Russia by Calling Obama 'Soft'.  On Sunday [12/18/2016], NBC Meet the Press host Chuck Todd displayed the ability for some on the left to blame Republicans for anything.

Can You Trust the Press?  No.  Judith Miller, formerly of the New York Times, explains why we cannot trust the fake news vomited forth by the leftist "mainstream" information gatekeepers:  [Video clip]

4 Reasons Russia Didn't Swing The Election To Trump.  Democrats are over the moon about the new Washington Post report that quotes CIA sources who say that Vladimir Putin and the Russian government actively attempted to aid Donald Trump in his election race against Hillary Clinton.  Many Democrats have been making the claim that if not for Putin's intervention — if not for Russian hackers accessing emails from Hillary campaign chief John Podesta and then releasing them via WikiLeaks for months — Hillary Clinton would today be the president-elect.  There's no evidence to support that.  There is plenty of evidence to support the contrary notion, actually.

Mainstream Media Claims Russia Hacked U.S. Election, Offers Absolutely No Proof.  The CIA on Friday [12/9/2016] leaked a memo to the Washington Post "concluding" that Russia meddled in the U.S. election to help President-elect Donald Trump win — but any evidence supporting that finding remains secret.

The King of Fake News.  The liberals would love to do away with free speech, as Hillary Clinton would have if she'd been elected and could have packed the Supreme Court with liberals who would have reversed the Citizens United decision and others protecting free speech.  But the best way to do away with about 99 percent of the "fake news" that is broadcast and printed is for the liberals and their media allies to stop creating it.  Fake news — propaganda — is often risible and easily recognized.  When the North Korean government described the first time Kim Jong-Il (father of Kim Jong-Loon, the current dictator) went golfing, they broadcast that he scored a hole-in-one five times in one round of golf.  These days, the liberal media don't wait for enemy governments to make stuff up.  They do it themselves.

How a free press became fake.  If one wonders why American audiences are reposting fake news rather than purchasing subscriptions to the Washington Post, look no further.  When the free press falls into disrepair, readers click elsewhere.  Just as the electorate rejected elites at the ballot box in November, so audiences are ditching the establishment news media.  They're tired of journalists accepting fluff for fact, lecturing instead of reporting, and getting the story plain wrong.

MSNBC Host Apologizes For Falsely Claiming Fox News Held Its Christmas Party at Trump Hotel.  This morning, MSNBC host Stephanie Ruhle accused Fox News of holding its Christmas party at President-elect Donald Trump's recently opened Washington hotel.  The comment was part of a discussion revolving around potential conflicts of interest the incoming POTUS may have when it comes to his businesses.  The only problem was that Fox News has not even held its annual party yet and the upcoming party they've scheduled will be at a different hotel that isn't affiliated with Trump.

Sheriff Clarke:  Liberal Media Created Fake News With 'Hands Up Don't Shoot' Lie.  Liberal journalists and activists spread far and wide the myth that Michael Brown had his hands up before being gunned down by police officer Darren Wilson.  That claim was the origin of the Black Lives Matter movement and eventually lead to violent rioting in Ferguson.  The facts of the case showed the 'Hands up don't shoot' claim to be false and that Wilson was justified in shooting Brown.

Lies, [...] and LA Times editorials.  The Left, having no value for truth, honesty, integrity, or anything else besides getting their way of course, has no problem with printing absolute falsehoods like the ones in this editorial bemoaning the prospect of national concealed carry reciprocity.  It seems the Times is aggrieved that liberty and greater ability to self-defense might soon be coming[.]

Zakaria: 'Working-Class Whites' Vote On Emotion, Not Policy.  Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign did not fail as a result of its subscription to unpopular left-wing policies, said left-wing CNN's Fareed Zakaria on Sunday's [12/4/2016] GPS.  As is his custom, his introductory monologue was a reading of his weekly column at left-wing news outlet The Washington Post.  Despite declaring Hillary Clinton's victory as inevitable on October 16 ("Let's be clear.  Donald Trump will lose the election."), Zakaria now claims to understand President-elect Donald Trump's appeal.  He also now claims to know what Clinton could have done to win the presidency.  American voters aren't driven by policy, said Zakaria, but by emotion: [...]

Democrats, Not Trump, Racialize Our Politics.  The most absurd Democratic meme to emerge from the party's ballot-box defeat is the claim that it is Donald Trump, rather than Democrats, who engages in "aggressive, racialized discourse," in the words of a Los Angeles Times op-ed.  By contrast, President Barack Obama sought a "post-racial, bridge-building society," according to New York Times reporter Peter Baker.  Obama's post-racial efforts have now "given way to an angry, jeering, us-against-them nation," writes Baker, in a front-page "news" story.  Tell that valedictory for "post-racial bridge-building" to police officers, who have been living through two years of racialized hatred directed at them in the streets, to the applause of many Democratic politicians.

Boycott Frosted Flakes!  Liberal bullies are trying to pressure advertisers into boycotting Breitbart.com, one of the most popular conservative sites on the internet. [...] Most CEOs of large companies are liberals, as are nearly all PR employees of such companies.  So this kind of response comes naturally.  The AP helpfully explains:  ["]Breitbart has been condemned for featuring racist, sexist and anti-Semitic content.["]  Really?  Condemned by whom?  For what?  The AP ritually recites these allegations against the site without citing any evidence whatsoever.  The claims are false, if not ridiculous.  But readers who rely on America's daily newspapers won't know this.

The Fake Arbiters of "Fake News".  As everyone already knows, on Friday the business section of The Washington Post published an article about so-called "fake news" propagated on the Internet.  The Russian propaganda services are said to be behind this disinformation, with many American websites helping to spread it, deliberately or otherwise.  One of the WaPo's principal sources for the story was a website called "PropOrNot".  For some reason the author, Craig Timberg, failed to link the site, although he linked many others.  However, in its post on the piece, Zero Hedge provides a link to the 200 "fake news" websites listed by PropOrNot.  Gates of Vienna was not illustrious enough to make the Post's article, but PropOrNot has honored us by including us in the list of sites that retail "fake news".

'Fake news' isn't the problem — mainstream news with an agenda is.  "Fake news" has been a big news story for the past week.  Hoaxes and fabrications hatched by clickbait-hungry websites — or, some reports say, by the Kremlin propaganda machine — have been blamed for Donald Trump's election victory.  Leading journalists such as CNN's Christiane Amanpour have decried the profession's "existential crisis" caused by the onslaught of fake stories.  Google and Facebook have both moved to curb the problem by denying advertising to "fake news" sites.  Meanwhile, critics on both the left and the right argue that the outcry about "fake news" is a manufactured crisis intended to smear and ostracize dissident, non-mainstream media — especially since some of the critiques lump together publications that contain real if slanted reporting, such as Breitbart News or Antiwar.com, with sites that publish actual hoaxes (such as a story about Pope Francis endorsing Trump) or satire.  Critics also charge that the "fake news" trope obscures the fact that the mainstream media have their own problem with false or misleading stories.

Fake News.  The success of "fake news" is inextricably linked to the state of credibility of the media.  Fake news would get no purchase if the media's credibility were high.  But surveys showed it has been declining for years and the Russians could not have helped but notice.  They very cleverly exploited the fact that news organizations were increasingly used by politicians to spread lies.  Talking Points, which made the coordination of lies easier, also made them easier to detect.

32 Times Establishment Media and Pollsters Assured the People of Donald Trump's Defeat.  From the time Donald Trump announced his White House bid, there has been no shortage of establishment media outlets predicting his defeat.  Indeed, as the weeks and months marked Trump's ever-apparent political preeminence, the pundits, pollsters, and prognosticators doubted and declared his collapse inevitable.  Even as Trump, a real estate mogul-turned-reality TV star, clinched the Republican presidential nomination, the affirmations of his failure kept coming.  The very establishment media and pollsters who benefitted from Trump's celebrity before branding him leader of a deplorable political base will stand against his governance.

Chicago Tribune:  Obama has been Pro Second Amendment!  Steve Chapman is a writer for the Chicago Tribune.  He has often written about gun legislation.  He stands out at the Tribune as a voice that recognizes reality more often then most.  His writing and viewpoints have been a reasonable voice crying in the wilderness of Chicago.  Unfortunately, he lives in the fantasy bubble of current Progressivism.  It is evident in his recent column excoriating the NRA.  He buys into the leftist propaganda without introspection or examination of facts.  It is an opinion column, but opinions should have a basis in reality.

LA Times produces list of "fake new sites" that includes a bunch o' sites more accurate than it is.  Having blamed James Comey, Russia, John Podesta, Julian Assange, warmal colding, and screwed up computer algorithms for the failure of a screeching, unhealthy, and unpopular harridan to achieve the presidency, the latest culprit appears to be "fake news".

Speaking Of Fake News, The 'Muslim Registry'.  Donald Trump has never called for a "Muslim registry," and any story claiming otherwise should be relegated to the pile of "fake news" the media is so concerned about right now.  The hysterical headlines claiming Trump and his surrogates are preparing to force all Muslims in the country to register perhaps reached their climax in this Washington Post headline Friday:  "They interned my family.  Don't let them do it to Muslims."

Crying and lying:  Hysteria and repeated false claims showered upon us by the left.  Greg Gutfeld brutally calls out the left and the fake cable news shows that push out the false narratives and refuse to investigate the veracity of the claims that pass over their airwaves.  Remarkable is the stream of claims that America is now tainted by the Trump supporters and their hateful antics.  Case after case is blurted across the left leaning cable shows.  But it seems there is never a corroboration or proof of the incidents so claimed.

Drown Out the Lying MSM.  Older readers may remember an era when the media generally reported facts and left spin to the mind of the viewer, or at least wasn't so crookedly biased.  In accurately predicting President-Elect Trump's victorious path through Michigan and Pennsylvania, I indicated that the media was distorting polling numbers deliberately to keep Trump supporters from bothering to vote.  While Trump won an electoral landslide, only a relatively small chunk of votes made the difference in those two states and in Florida.  Yes, the lying, propagandizing jackals in media nearly won the election for Clinton.  They decided to hang together up until the bitter end, and are now predictably circling the wagons trying to figure out what went wrong.  Everyone knew there was a secret Trump vote, and they still lied. [...] Do you enjoy being lied to?  Or do you have to watch sports so badly that you're willing to fork over $150 per month for a cable or dish subscription that directly funds people who hate you and everything you believe in and want to mislead you, all while insulting you to your face?

There Is No Violent Hate-Crimewave in 'Trump's America'.  [W]hile all sorts of horrible incidents are being reported on Twitter and Facebook... well, anyone can say anything on Twitter and Facebook.  The bulk of these stories are "friend of a friend" told me types.  But if men were really going around pulling knives on Muslim women on public buses in Trump's name, there would at least be local or campus news reports of it.  Same, too, for the alleged wave of transgender teen suicides which keep getting mentioned in media but for which no one can offer any evidence.

Really?  Do you have 'Hundreds' of pictures?
Brian Stelter: 'Hundreds' Of Swastikas, Racist Attacks After Trump Win.  In little-noticed remarks Saturday [11/12/2016], "Reliable Sources" host Brian Stelter Saturday [11/12/2016] parroted data from the Southern Poverty Law Center, claiming that there have been "hundreds of cases of swastikas, of racist language, of harassment, of in some cases, assaults and bullying across this country" since Donald Trump was elected.

An Important Post-Election Message About Media PollingThe media didn't get it wrong.  The pollsters did not work from the wrong data set; the media pollsters, consultants and professional political class did not work from the wrong assumptions, or use the incorrect baselines.  THEY LIED.  The professional media polling agents knew exactly what the truth was.  They lied and manipulated their data in a concerted effort to intentionally falsify reality.  There should be no doubt, EVER, in the mind of any political observer as to what took place within the expressed and broadcasted polling which fueled over two years of broadcast news.  The media intentionally lied.  They knew the truth.  The same tools available to us, and to those who were ridiculed for truth-telling, were available to them and many more.  They did not get it wrong.  They chose to lie to you the American electorate.

The real election surprise?  The uprising of the American people.  [Scroll down]  The political class and the mainstream media have a narrative that Trump's late surge is the result of an intervention by FBI Director James Comey.  That narrative, like every one they've had over this cycle, couldn't be more wrong.  The momentum of the election was already moving toward Trump before Comey's announcement to reopen of the Clinton email investigation.  That event, like the presidential debate in 1980, tended to accelerate what was already in motion.

On The Upside, At Least This Election Will Destroy The Media.  Liberal journalists, by which I mean journalists, do not think you should know things that hurt their favored candidate.  This is an interesting new take on the whole idea of "news reporting," an innovative rethink that refocuses journalists less on ensuring people hear the news and instead focuses on ensuring they only hear certain news that, incidentally, supports the media's progressive political agenda.  So we get fact checking that involves neither facts nor checking.

The Media Must Be Dismantled In Order For Freedom To Survive.  News has always been biased, but the American media exists for one reason and one reason only in 2016 — to further the agenda of the corporate-government complex a.k.a. the globalists. [...] You will never get any truth from the media when it comes to politics and many other issues. [...] I have personally not watched television in over a year since leaving the news industry, and my mind is more focused than it has ever been in my life.  I will likely never own another television in my life.

How 'Convicted Criminal' James O'Keefe Came to Be 'Discredited'.  [Anderson] Cooper introduced the videos by sniffing at O'Keefe's "less than stellar reputation for accuracy."  As inevitably happens, he cited no examples of O'Keefe's inaccuracies.  Cooper then turned the task over to CNN "investigative reporter" Drew Griffin who promptly upped the libel ante by referring to O'Keefe as a "discredited conservative activist."  Again, there was no effort to prove the "discredited" label or the "conservative" one, for that matter.

Debunking the Vicious False Narratives against Donald Trump.  By now, every voter knows that the mainstream media is in the pocket of Hillary Clinton but many do not know the extent of the malpractice in journalism today.  The MSM has successfully embedded in the minds of the voters false narratives that need to be exposed out of just plain common decency.  The three I will address in this piece are the charges that Trump mocked a disabled reporter; that he questioned the Mexican American's legitimacy to handle his court case because of his race, and that he mocked a Gold Star family.  There are many more.

Ex-NY Times Public Editor Aghast That Anyone Thinks Times Reporters Make Stuff Up.  GOP nominee Donald Trump is alleging the game is rigged against him from a disturbing combo of inevitable voting fraud and slanted media coverage of the campaign.  Predictably, media stalwarts blithely dismiss Trump's allegation as paranoid and delusional.  Perhaps they should not be so quick to laugh it off, given the media's track record when it comes to fiction fobbed off as journalism.

Liberty students less divided over Trump than MSM claims.  Mainstream media reports portray Liberty University students as turning against Donald Trump, but a current student says this is just an exaggeration meant to divide the student body.

Alicia Machado Is 2016's Sandra Fluke, A Democratic Public Relations Scam.  Sandra Fluke became the centerpiece of the Democrats' "War on Women" messaging that they pounded throughout the year.  The media completely ate it up, hook, line, and sinker.  Within minutes, she was put on every major network and cable outlet.  The media ran with stories about how women weren't allowed to testify at the hearing, even though two female college administrators — Dr. Allison Dabbs Garrett, the senior vice-president for academic affairs at Oklahoma Christian University, and Dr. Laura Champion, medical director of Calvin College Health Services — testified.  The facts were no barrier to the headlines, which included CBS' "Dems decry all-male House panel on WH contraception rule" and CNN's "Angry lawmakers challenge lineup at hearing:  'Where are the women?'"

Rudy Giuliani defends Trump on 'stop and frisk' and demands apology from 'dead wrong' debate moderator Lester Holt for declaring it 'unconstitutional'.  Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani is demanding an apology from Lester Holt, the moderator of Monday night's presidential debate, for incorrectly declaring stop-and-frisk policing methods 'unconstitutional.'  'Donald Trump was right,' Giuliani wrote in an op-ed published by The Wall Street Journal.

Hillary's Pneumonia Hokum:  A Timeline.  [Scroll down]  Some of the dinosaur media have reported that Hillary "stumbled at the curb" and "fell into the van."  Others reported that she "fainted."  This shows the extremely low quality of "journalism" today, describing things that just didn't happen, as you can see for yourself in the video.  Hillary didn't "stumble";she buckled at the knees.  She didn't "faint" (lose consciousness and go limp).  Hillary herself says she didn't faint, and for once she might be telling the truth, because the video shows that she was apparently awake but immobile.  She was having a seizure of some kind.

Dear Media:  Please Stop Calling Violent Rioters 'Protesters'.  Watching coverage of the unrest in Charlotte, North Carolina last night, I was struck by a common trend in how the most violent acts were being covered. [...] Looting a Wal-Mart, destruction of property, attempted murder, all carried out by... "protesters." [...] I suppose you could make a convoluted argument about how the protests were against white supremacy, and capitalism and the media are agents of white supremacy, therefore attacking those institutions are acts of "protest" or whatever.  But if even violent attempted murder and destruction of property can be a "protest" so long as the motives are political, I don't see why the same can't be said of, say, a terrorist attack.

Joy Reid:  Not True That Republicans Passed Civil Rights for African-Americans That Democrats Opposed.  Saturday on MSNBC's "AM Joy," host Joy Reid disagreed with chairman of the Black Republican Caucus of Florida Sean P. Jackson when he said that if it was not for Republicans, African-Americans would still be enslaved.

MSNBC: Republicans Purging Minorities to Steal Election, Hack Results.  MSNBC's Joy Reid, who was swift to condemn Republican concerns of voter fraud, was equally as fast at accusing them of plotting to steal the election.  Reid's concern centered on a computer system called CrossCheck which was developed to find duplicate names on the voter rolls so they can be removed.  But Reid and her guest Rolling Stone writer Greg Palast, who brought the issue to her attention, accuse the system of targeting minorities.  "The system disproportionality targets voters of color who are likely to have common surnames, like Washington or Hernandez," Reid stated.

Media Invented Lie About Trump Mocking Disabled Reporter.  Just when you think the media could not possibly become more loathsome, the Fourth Estate bullies prove you wrong again.  The Washington Post's latest ugliness was to exploit the disability of a newspaper reporter in order to smear the Republican nominee for president.  Then — and this is the least surprising part of the story — the Post lied about it.

Desperate Media Declare Trump Mexico Summit a Failure in Advance.  Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump had not even left yet for his visit to Mexico on Wednesday morning [8/31/2016] when the mainstream media began declaring it a failure.

National NBC Reporter Claims "Trump Rally Crowds Small" — Despite Akron Ohio Max Capacity Crowd 5,000+.  The trust in U.S. journalism is at a historic low.  Most Americans now accept the U.S. media is completely dishonest.  However, the media reporters claim such public opinions are unwarranted. [...] Any objective observer of the news media's treatment of Trump can certainly conclude that reporters are taking a side in this election — and they don't have to be wearing a button that says "I'm with her" for this to be readily apparent.

Almost Everything the Media Tell You About Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Is Wrong.  A major new report, published today [8/22/2016] in the journal The New Atlantis, challenges the leading narratives that the media has pushed regarding sexual orientation and gender identity.  Co-authored by two of the nation's leading scholars on mental health and sexuality, the 143-page report discusses over 200 peer-reviewed studies in the biological, psychological, and social sciences, painstakingly documenting what scientific research shows and does not show about sexuality and gender.  The major takeaway, as the editor of the journal explains, is that "some of the most frequently heard claims about sexuality and gender are not supported by scientific evidence."

Media Matters fabricates quote from Robert Spencer, claims he runs "white nationalist think tank".  Did you know I was a "white nationalist think tank leader"?  Neither did I.  I didn't know I was a white nationalist, and didn't know I ran a think tank.  Just think of all the meetings I've missed. [...] Media Matters claims to correct the lies of the Right.  In fact, it is they who are the liars.

Black males murder five year old white girl in Milwaukee.  No national outrage.  Two black males in Milwaukee walked up to the home of a white family, in a majority black neighborhood, and unleashed a hail of gunfire.  A five year old white girl, Laylah Petersen, was murdered while sitting on her grandfather's lap.  Milwaukee police say there is no question the shooters were deliberating trying to kill people inside the house.  At least a dozen bullets were fired directly into the house.  There may have been a third person driving a getaway car.  The house was located in a census tract that is 77% black and 14% white.  The Milwaukee Sentinel and Milwaukee channel 6 have actually been trying to downplay the murder.  They are falsly reporting that it was "a stray bullet."  That directly contradicts all the evidence found by police.

Megan Twohey of the New York Times Caught in a Media Hoax.  Megan Twohey of the New York Times offers you a master class in how to spot a liar.  Megan Twohey along with "journalist" Michael Barbaro recently published a hit on Donald Trump.  In their article, ["]Crossing the Line:  How Donald Trump Behaved with Women in Public["], Twohey and Barbaro accused Trump of conduct varying from sexual harassment to "debasing" of women.  The problem?  The story was a hoax!

The Media Are Lying to Hide Clinton's Animosity to the Second Amendment.  This is the state of "journalism" today.  Members of the media who desperately want Hillary Clinton to be elected president are stooping to unprecedented lows, abandoning all pretenses of impartiality, forfeiting whatever remnant of credibility they might otherwise have, trying to prevent voters from realizing that Hillary Clinton fundamentally opposes the individual right to keep and bear arms.  The Washington Post, to single out one of the worst in this regard, is worried that voters agree with Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump that if Clinton were elected, she would "essentially abolish the Second Amendment."

The Misinformation Age.  The thing is, our mass media culture is mostly fabricated nonsense.  Most of what the news people "report" is made up.  As soon as you see the word "sources" you know what follows is invented.  Even when someone is named as a source, nine times out of ten we learn that the named source did not actually say what he was claimed to have said.  The other day, the news people were claiming Trump got in a fight with a baby at one of his events.  It turns out he made some harmless jokes about a crying baby.

The media's lies and double standards accelerate at blinding speed.  [Scroll down]  As a senator, Mrs. Clinton had voted for the Iraq war and refused to support the military surge that turned the war around, and as secretary of state, she supported President Obama's precipitous withdrawal from Iraq, which created the vacuum into which the Islamic State stepped, and failed to honor repeated requests for greater security in Benghazi, all while Mr. Trump was a private citizen.  But according to Mr. Khan, Mr. Trump is the villain:  "Donald Trump consistently smears the character of Muslims," he said.  "He disrespects other minorities, women, judges, even his own party leadership.  He vows to build walls and ban us from this country."  Another untruth.  Rather than "ban Muslims" from entering the country, Mr. Trump proposes a temporary hold on those coming from nations "compromised" by Islamic terrorism and once the situation is in hand, thorough background checks on all immigrants coming from those areas.  Mr. Khan also wondered if Mr. Trump had "read the Constitution."  Never mind that the Constitution does not offer religious freedom protections to non-citizens and that as a matter of law and policy, we are not obligated to let anyone into the country.  Throughout his time in the spotlight, Mr. Khan parroted the media's distortions, and they ate it up.

Media Photoshops Crowd Image For Hillary Clinton St.  Petersburg, Florida Speech.  Remember the discussions of "optics" and trying to manufacture the perception of support for Hillary Clinton?  It's all a pretense; a fraud; a corporate media ruse.  Well, a great example comes today from "The Hill", an on-line media outlet promoting the speech of candidate Clinton.

The Media vs. America.  The other night I spent some time with Donald Trump.  He had come to Cumberland Valley High School in Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania, a mere five or so miles up the road from my house.  The Trump rally was filled — completely — with thousands inside and outside thousands more waiting (in vain) to get in the door.  Here's what interested.  Never once — not once — did I hear Donald Trump mention the Khans, the now famous parents of a son killed in battle in Iraq.  Even more to the point?  In talking with many people in the audience before and after the rally, no one — say again not a single soul — mentioned the Khans.  What I did hear from Trump was talk about jobs, trade, the economy, ISIS and more.  Which was the talk from members of the audience when I spoke to many of them before and after the rally.  They volunteered directly to me, conversation after another, their thoughts about ObamaCare, a sick child, jobs, trade, pride in America, Hillary and so on.  And yet?  Mysteriously when I returned home and turned on the television or checked on-line it seemed to be all-Khan all-the-time.  As if Trump had spent the evening re-hashing the whole subject yet again.  Which he had not.

Exclusive: NBC Quietly Scrubs 'Discredited' Smear of Bill Clinton Rape Accuser.  Following the receipt of a retraction demand, NBC News has quietly edited the Internet edition of a segment that aired on the highly-rated "Today Show" in which anchor Andrea Mitchell claimed Juanita Broaddrick's rape accusation against Bill Clinton had been "discredited."  After receiving the legal letter, penned by Broaddrick's attorney and son, Kevin L. Hickey, NBC removed the word "discredited" from the network's Internet version of Mitchell's video report, Broaddrick and Hickey told this reporter.  However, NBC did not make any indication of the edit in the video or on the webpage that hosts it.

Free Beacon Catches NBC Scrubbing Old Video of Mitchell Saying Juanita Broaddrick Is 'Discredited'.  In a breaking story posted late Tuesday afternoon [8/2/2016] by our friends at the Washington Free Beacon, staff writer and former CNS News staff writer Elizabeth Harrington revealed that NBC News has stealth edited a May 19 video of Clinton campaign correspondent Andrea Mitchell on Today denouncing Juanita Broaddrick's sexual allegations against Bill Clinton as "a discredited and long-denied accusation" to merely being a "long-denied accusation."  Mitchell's original phrasing was flagged the day that it aired live on NBC by the MRC's Kyle Drennen and he chronicled the network's history concerning Broaddrick and Clinton.

Media Hoax!  Dishonest Journalists Claim Alex Jones was Arrested.  The mainstream media was at it again, this time attempting to hoax the world by claiming Alex Jones had been arrested for punching a black cop.  The truth is that SJWs assaulted him.  I know because I was there filming the entire event.  At a small gathering of discontents, Alex Jones appeared with his bull horn explaining how the protesters were globalist tools of George Soros.  As Jones approached the group, they attacked him.  Police intervened, separating the two groups.  Yet the media began spreading a hoax, claiming Jones assaulted a black police officer.

Website Gets Busted Trying to Cover Obama's Lies.  Rumor-disproving website Snopes has proven itself especially unreliable on all matters political, and it did so again this week when it tried to "bust" the myth that President Obama had paid Iran $400 million in exchange for American citizens being held in Iranian jails.  Both Snopes and the Obama administration insist that the payment was part of the Iran nuclear deal and completely unconnected to the release of the men.

Media Outlet Claims Big, Boisterous Crowd At Clinton Rally.  There's just one problem:  The crowd was not really that big.

Misleading headine
Misleading Headline of the Month:  AP "Man who shot sleeping intruder".  The above headline must be one of the most misleading that I have seen.  It comes from AP itself.  It is aided and abbetted by the AP leading sentence.  From the washingtontimes.com:  ["]BEND, Ore. (AP) - The man who shot and killed another person asleep inside a Bend home in 2012 is asking a court to throw out a wrongful death lawsuit against him.["]  The intruder was not sleeping.  He was actively fighting the couple that found him asleep in the homeowners house.  There was an extensive investigation, and the shooting was ruled justified.  The story is all over the Internets, with the factually wrong headline and first sentence.


So Much for That 'Unprecedented' Jail Talk.  The Republican convention's rowdy chants about Hillary Clinton — "Lock her up!" — have caused liberal journalists to get extremely distressed.  In their lead editorial on July 21, The Washington Post fulminated that Team Trump's "descent from standard red-meat partisanship to unprecedented accusations of criminality displays contempt for the rule of law and a startling disinterest in fact and reason."  That's strong brew.  It's too bad for them that it's completely false.  Somehow, the Post writers are acting like they were born yesterday, or slept through the last Republican presidency.  They've chosen to overlook that their liberal friends in news and entertainment were active participants in an eight-year anti-GOP hatefest.  Take CNN commentator Jack Cafferty, who on October 17, 2005, gushed to Wolf Blitzer about the idea of Karl Rove in prison: [...]

How The Media Covers Up Muslim And #Blacklivesmatter Terrorism.  The propaganda, the artful selection and deselection of facts, have become as familiar to us as they were to any of the residents of the Soviet Union or North Korea.  Anyone who pays attention knows not only that they are being lied to, but can easily predict the lies that they will be told on the evening news even before they actually hear them being spoken out loud.  We always knew that the Muslim terrorist, even before he was identified, would turn out to be a secular loner who was depressed over his family life.  All the media had to do with Mohammed Bouhlel, the Islamic terrorist who murdered 84 people in Nice, France was to replay the same exact narrative as the one that they had fed us with Omar Mateen, the Islamic terrorist who murdered 49  people in Orlando.  Irreligious, depressed loner with family problems.  Check.  No connection to Islamic terrorism.  Suggestion of mental illness.  Check and check.  Insistence on his lack of interest in religion?  One final check.

MSNBC's 'truck crash' framing of France terror attack ignites Twitter mockery.  An MSNBC tweet on late Thursday [7/14/2016] that framed France's latest terror attack as a "truck crash" elicited a stinging response from readers.  "Follow our live blog for the latest from Nice after a truck crash leaves at least 70 dead," the network tweeted at 8:49 p.m.  EST., well after even President Obama and French President Francois Hollande called the event an act of terrorism.  Mohamed Lahouaiej Bouhlel, 31, killed at least 84 people during Bastille Day ceremonies by plowing a giant truck through crowds along the Promenade des Anglais.

Media blames truck, not terrorists or Islam, for Nice attack.  Leftist media outlets reacted to the devastating attack in Nice not by blaming Islam or even terrorists, but by suggesting that an inanimate object — the truck — was responsible for the carnage.  Instead of pointing the finger at Islamists, CNN, CBC and the New York Times all published headlines that served to hide the true nature of the attack.  CBC reported, "Children feared killed in Nice as truck attacks family event".  Presumably, the truck was somehow able to manifest artificial intelligence and plough itself through dozens of victims.

When liberal narratives override the facts.  Here we go again.  Yet another hotly reported media narrative stamps itself on the national dialogue only to find — oops! — maybe there are actually more facts to be discovered before we know, as they say, "the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth."  This time around the media narrative surrounds the Minnesota shooting by St. Anthony Village Police Department officer Jeronimo Yanez, the shooting victim one Philando Castile.

Shocker! It Looks Like the Media May Have Bought a False Narrative in Philando Castile Shooting.  If there is one thing I've learned about media firestorms in the modern age of one-hour news cycles and 15-second attention spans, it's that whoever tells the first story which the news media likes is the "winner."  Once the narrative is set in stone (when the news media works in unison that takes about two days, tops), the truth will face a battle that is severely uphill, into the wind, on ice, and will almost never prevail.  There was no better example of this sad reality than the "Hands Up!  Don't Shoot!" myth which drove the entire Ferguson fiasco and was the origin of the entire "Black Lives Matter" movement.  Every investigation into the matter (including by the Obama administration) later concluded, against self-interest, that this catchphrase was based on an obvious and despicable lie.  However, even that did almost nothing to alter public perceptions of that event or the media's eagerness to give instant credibility to similar claims from the same groups in the future.

Update:
Woman Who Famously Live-Streamed Her Boyfriend's Police Shooting is Arrested for Hammer Attack.  Diamond Reynolds, the woman who famously live-streamed the controversial fatal police shooting of Philando Castile, has been arrested in connection with a vicious attack that left another woman with serious injuries.  Reynolds, Dyamond Richardson, and Chnika Blair were apprehended Thursday [3/23/2107] in St. Paul, Minnesota, after allegedly attacking a woman with a hammer Tuesday night [2/28/2017], and leaving the scene in a silver truck.

Media Ignore the Tsunami of Black Violence against Cops.  The shootings in Dallas did not make much of a difference.  Not to the reporters explaining the protest and the reason behind the assassination of five police officers.  The reason for the demonstration was simple and beyond pushback:  White cops shoot black people all over the country, all the time, for no reason whatsoever.  Everybody knows that.  So sad.  Some took it to the next level:  The head of a black group called Dallas Action said the killings were a wake up call to let people know how cops are picking on black people.  All the time.  For no reason whatsoever.  The local Fox reporter in Dallas took the comments in stride, quickly changing the topic to all the pretty lights on nearby police cars.  Not one reporter at any point even hinted at how black violence is wildly out of proportion.

Betrayed by an America-hating press.  The press lie constantly, and their lies are exposed every day by conservative radio and opinion sites.  Lying to the public is a basic betrayal of a vital survival function in a democratic republic, a true stab in the back. [...] In J schools in this country, "betrayal" of the basic obligations of journalism has a name.  It's called "advocacy journalism," but it means lying to every single American.

The Democrats' Self-Serving Distractions.  After the massacre at a gay club in Orlando, Fla., by an American Muslim of Afghan origin affiliated with the Islamic State, the editors of the New York Times argued that the fundamental problem was "hate" exemplified by ... opponents of same-sex marriage.  That was an interesting line of argument.  Omar Mateen was not found with a natural-law treatise in his back pocket, and he wasn't fresh from a Princeton seminar with Robert George.  He never suggested that the Supreme Court had taken too broad a view of the 14th Amendment in Obergefell v.  Hodges.  He was a Muslim fanatic whose heroes throw homosexuals off of tall buildings and crucify Christians.  The morning after that massacre, the New York Daily News reported the enormity under the headline:  "Thanks, NRA!"

Here's The Media's Latest Attempt To Downplay Radical Islam After Orlando Attack.  Ever since witnesses started coming out of the woodwork in the wake of the Orlando attack, claiming that shooter Omar Mateen had actually led a secret gay lifestyle, the liberal media has been desperately trying to portray the massacre as more of a homophobic hate crime than a radical Islamic terrorist attack.  It allows the left to view the attack as proof that hatred of the LGBT community is separate from the Muslim faith. [...] It was a coordinated attempt by the media to spin the narrative, to protect Islam at all costs, despite evidence to the contrary.  Unfortunately for them, the FBI has finally come out and said the entire narrative that Mateen was a self-hating gay man has no evidence to back it up.

Everything was accurate.  But none of it was true.  [Scroll down]  The points of this narrative:  One, the national media is not interested in accuracy or truth, but in getting the story out first.  Two, it should fit a template, e.g., the nation is racist, law enforcement is prejudiced, and they will frame their narrative accordingly (black male was shot, it was because the "white" Hispanic is racist, there is racism all over the country).  Three, the people doing the reporting have little knowledge of the facts they are discussing, such as what is the difference between an AR-15 and M-16, or "automatic fire" and "semi-automatic fire", and "define what is an assault weapon" ([indeed], so ignorant they should run for Congress).

6 Things To Know About Tying Gun Sales To A Watch List.  [#2] The Democrats are still falsely conflating the no-fly list with the terrorist watch list.  We've been over this before.  The no-fly list is not the same thing as the terrorist watch list.  The no-fly has roughly 40,000 names on it and many of them are not the names of U.S. citizens.  By contrast, the terrorist watch list has more than a million names on it (we can't know the actual number).  The legislation Democrats are pushing relies on a definition similar, but not identical, to the one used to create the terrorist watch list on a rolling basis.  It has nothing to do with the no-fly list.  That won't stop Democrats from conflating the two intentionally (as an aide to Sen. Diane Feinstein admitted she does), nor will it stop ignorant journalists from confusing them accidentally (as several have conceded to me they have).

Journalism, R. I. P.  For a variety of historical and cultural reasons, most of those who work in the media are progressives.  They believe that government must undertake to fix an array of social maladies, such as income inequality, perceived racial and gender disparities, and the general dangerous superstitions, bad habits, and cultural baggage of those of less education than reporters, investigative journalists, and Internet and television commentators.  Yet sometimes simply reporting on society's perceived ills does not offer quite a rich enough landscape in which to save humanity.  And sometimes reality offers examples that confound the progressive ideology.  Therefore, journalists often fabricate stories and justify their cons as necessary means to achieve their higher aims.

Guardian admits rogue reporter fabricated interviews.  The Guardian has admitted that a rogue reporter fabricated interviews in articles for the newspaper and falsely claimed to have been present at events he wrote about.  Joseph Mayton, a freelance who has been writing for the Guardian since 2009, has been accused of making up quotes in some of his stories, even filing interviews with people who later said they had never spoken to him.

The Continually Dishonest Media.  Apparently the U.S. media has chosen this week to once again reassert itself as the epitome of broadcast propaganda; Pravda must have been giving them a run for the ruses.  One of the examples today comes from the nascent Jake Tapper of CNN who rallied the proverbial troops around a claim that Donald Trump "brought up Vince Foster" while campaigning for President.

Media Lies About Court's Contraception Order.  Anyone still naïve enough to rely on the legacy media for unvarnished news will have gone to bed Monday evening [5/16/2016] believing that the Supreme Court evaded its duty regarding Little Sisters of the Poor v.  Burwell.  Countless headlines had declared that the Court decided to "punt," "skirt," or otherwise dodge any meaningful action concerning the challenge to the HHS contraception mandate.  In reality, SCOTUS handed the Little Sisters and the other petitioners with whom the Court consolidated their case a major victory in their protracted battle to defend religious liberties against the depredations of the Obama administration's bureaucrats and lawyers.  In a unanimous opinion, the justices vacated all lower court rulings against the Little Sisters and the other petitioners.  The term "vacated," in this context, means that the Court has rendered those adverse decisions legally void.  And the justices didn't stop there.

Irony Alert:  New MSNBC Ad Says 'We Seek Different Perspectives'.  With no sense of irony or humor, a new MSNBC ad claims the network "seeks different perspectives."  Yes, the cable channel home to some of most liberal hosts and journalists on the planet, touted, "We seek different perspectives, connect the dots, approach the story from all the angles."  The condescending commercial started airing on Tuesday [5/3/2016].  The unidentified voice lectured, "We break news.  Yeah.  But we do more than that.  If all you want is headlines, check your Twitter feed."  The announcer smugly continued, "We go beyond the sound bites."  What's so bizarre about this latest spot is that it directly contradicts previous MSNBC ads.

Top 10 Misreported or Underreported Stories of 2015.  [#1] The Fake Iran Agreement:  In July the mainstream media celebrated a deal between Iran and the P5+1 that would provide Iran with sanctions relief along with virtually no accountability.  Today, the administration, along with their lapdogs in the press, continues to argue that this somehow adds up to a good deal for the world.  It doesn't.  In fact, there really is no deal at all.  The New York Times and other news organizations still call this a "signed" deal.  It isn't.

How The Mainstream Media Spread Another False 'Islamophobia' Story.  The journalists and publications which implied the hit and run in Molenbeek this weekend was a 'far right' anti Islam attack had no evidence to suggest that it was as they reported, but they knew what story they wanted to write.  That's why most hesitantly wrote "during" a "far right demonstration" instead of bluntly labelling the driver a "far right activist" as did the Daily Mail, the first publication to report on the story.  Instead of acknowledging the categorical error, or clearly reporting the truth as it emerged, however, the Mail quietly edited their original article, burying the factual change three quarters of the way down the page, and failing to issue a correction or clarification.

Dumping Tabloid Trash on Ted Cruz.  The National Enquirer's name in journalism is synonymous with factually unsupported drivel of the lowest kind.  It is a sacred truth that no responsible journalist would reference the kind of garbage found in this tabloid.  But somehow it's perfectly appropriate for the same responsible journalists to report the sleaze over and over, emphasizing, of course, that the source is the awful National Enquirer.

CNN Started The Carson Drop-Out Rumor; Now They're Lying About It To Bash Cruz.  [Scroll down]  Cruz's team explicitly cited CNN's reporting in its emails.  Carson himself has sent emails blaming CNN.  Cruz correctly pointed out what happened on CNN, as you can see from the transcript [in this article].  And while CNN reporters tweeted that Carson wasn't dropping out, as did Carson staffers, CNN did not report on air that Carson was staying in the race until later in the evening.

'One Long Cheap Shot' — WashPost Lines Up Canadians to Bash Ted Cruz as Extreme.  While The Washington Post would only go to Kenya looking for gushing over Barack Obama, they turn to Canada to make fun of Ted Cruz.

The myth of the cop killing 'epidemic'.  To hear the media tell it, America is in the grip of an unprecedented crime wave, an orgy of wanton murder in which heavily armed thugs randomly gun down innocent unarmed people, some of them teens, just for sport.  Except that these homicidal goons are wearing the blues and badges of American police departments.  It's the narrative that's given rise to the protest movement Black Lives Matter and to a growing public mistrust of the police in general.  From Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo., to the recent shooting of a middle-aged woman and a teen in Chicago, the body count seemingly keeps rising, exacerbating racial tensions and keeping the nation on edge.  And each incident is breathlessly reported by a media determined to show that America remains deeply, irredeemably racist.  Problem is, it's simply not true.

Did Media Misquote NC Anti-Solar Residents To Make Them Look Stupid?  Numerous left-wing media outlets have repeatedly misquoted citizens of Woodland, N.C., after the city government voted to reject a proposed solar farm.  An article in the Huffington Post claimed local resident Bobby Mann said the proposed solar farm would "stop plants from growing and suck up all the energy from the sun," during his testimony to the Woodland Town Council, citing an article in the Roanoke-Chowan Herald-News.  However, the Herald-News only directly quotes Bobby Mann as saying "You're killing your town, [a]ll the young people are going to move out."  Other media outlets repeated the misquote.

Biggest Liar of 2015: The Washington Post and Its Pinocchios.  [Scroll down]  The [Washington] Post, of course, was an early and gleeful adopter of the narrative of the unarmed black person shot for no reason whatsoever by racist police in Ferguson who apparently did that kind of thing all the time.  This Lie infected more than just miles and miles of newsprint in the hard news sections.  It was also reported and spread in the sports, lifestyle, opinion, entertainment, and virtually every other nook and cranny of the Post — even after the attorney general grudgingly admitted the entire thing was a hoax in March of this year.  The lies are legion.  A few of the more deceitful:  The Post led the way in glorifying the hundreds of black Capitol Hill staffers who gathered for a photo op in their $1000 coats, soft leather gloves stretched into the air, proclaiming 'hands up, don't shoot.'  [...]

Thank You, Joe Scarborough, For Being So Biased And Fact Challenged.  Those tuning into Monday's [11/9/2015] "Morning Joe" on MSNBC might've wondered about the "worst record" poll that host Joe Scarborough said unfairly kicked Chris Christie off the Fox debate stage.  We wondered, too.

Carson Blows Up at Reporters During Presser: Why Don't You Care About Obama's Past?  Ben Carson faced some combative reporters during a press conference in Florida tonight about the various issues in his background that have been raised this week.  He dismissed Politico's report about him not being formally offered a West Point scholarship, simply insisting it was relayed to him that he could get one with the kind of accomplishments in his background.

The Three (Clinton) Stooges and CNBC.  [Scroll down]  Quintanella has a BA in political science.  So does Quick.  John Harwood says evasively that he studied economics and history as an undergraduate.  At least half their colleagues have degrees in journalism.  Almost none have had experience managing anyone else's money.  So it came as no surprise when Becky Quick asked Ted Cruz what he was going to do about the fact that women earn 77% of what men make.  This claim has been made for four decades; it's almost as old as Becky.  It has 999 lives.  No matter how many times it's refuted by economists, the mantra is repeated — like the similarly discredited claim that intelligence tests are culturally biased.

GOP Media Takedown: A Recipe for Victory.  Along with lawyers and politicians, the media is a group for which Americans have a fairly intense dislike.  This is largely because as with the first two groups, a big part of the modern media's business is lying, and no one likes being lied to. [...] Along with entertainment and academia, they constitute a tripartite axis of cultural evil.  They are Americans' conduit of information, and how can citizens choose the right policies and politicians if they're being fed misinformation?

Biased coverage of Israeli-Palestinian 'violence': When terror becomes 'tensions'.  If you are seeking an example of bias in the media's coverage of what journalists are calling the latest round of Israeli-Palestinian "violence," consider the case of Ahmad Manasra.  In an angry speech on Wednesday night [10/14/2015], Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, appealed for calm but accused Israeli security forces of killing Palestinian boys "in cold blood," singling out the 13-year-old Manasra as one of the Palestinian youths Israel had "executed." [...] There are at least two major problems with Abbas' charge:  First, Ahmad Manasra was not "executed" or even shot by Israelis.

The Ahmed Mohamed Fairy Tale.  There can be no doubt that Americans are fortunate enough to be governed by a brilliantly conceived Constitution drafted by remarkable, intelligent men.  Unfortunately, too many Americans are utterly ignorant of what it contains and how it impacts on their lives.  Voter ignorance on this and so much else contributes to the ease with which the media manipulates public opinion into believing things which are not so.

Lessons in disaster for the next Katrina.  [#1] Though the press patted itself on the back afterwards, in fact, as American University Journalism Professor W. Joseph Campbell writes, "it's instructive to recall how extreme and over the top the reporting was from New Orleans in Katrina's aftermath."  Reports of wandering bands of rapists, a 10-year-old girl raped in the New Orleans Convention Center, claims that people were shooting at rescue helicopters, sharks haunting the floodwaters, bodies stacked like cordwood — all were false.  Though the extremism generated ratings, and satisfied the anti-American urges of the foreign press, it did real harm.  New Orleans, a city battered by disaster, was portrayed as, in Maureen Dowd's words, "a snake pit of anarchy, death, looting, raping, marauding thugs, suffering innocents, a shattered infrastructure, a gutted police force, insufficient troop levels and criminally negligent government planning."  Dowd used this portrayal to take shots at then-President George W. Bush, and I suspect a lot of the media pile-on was similarly motivated, but it had the effect of stigmatizing victims and, by playing up anarchy and danger, may even have delayed the arrival of aid, as rescuers feared to go in without armed escort.  Overall, a horrible media performance.

An activist masquerading as a journalist is an impostor.
Activist anchor Jorge Ramos uses influence to push immigration agenda.  Univision anchor Jorge Ramos, who has long been as much an activist as a newsman, managed to find himself at the center of an immigration story yet again this week as he went head-to-head with GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump, getting tossed from a press conference after repeatedly and insistently trying to ask questions.

Obama, Bush, Clinton: Secret Agents.  [Scroll down]  [Jorge Ramos] asserts proudly that he votes in elections in both countries.  (Translation of Ramos' world view:  He'd like to see the U.S. flooded with the dregs of his native country so he and Democrat elites could rule it without a vibrant middle class as they do Mexico.)  Ramos is employed by Univision, whose owner Haim Saban is a big Clinton contributor, Mrs. Saban is a big Hillary supporter.  Jorge's daughter works for Hillary Clinton.  He is most certainly a Clinton operative in newsman's drag.

Jorge Ramos Is an Immigration Activist Posing as a Reporter.  Jorge Ramos may be the award-winning celebrity anchor of Univision's premier news broadcast, but "the Walter Cronkite of Hispanic News" long ago revealed himself to be less a journalist than another perpetually indignant immigration activist.  His devolution into outright heckler was only a matter of time.  It would be difficult to overstate Ramos's immigration radicalism.  When Central American children were pouring over the border last summer, Ramos announced as a solution, "First, we treat children like children, as if they were our own."  When, in their 2012 interview, Newt Gingrich told Ramos, "I'm not going to let you define what 'immigration reform' is," Ramos replied, "It's very simple:  to legalize 11 million undocumented immigrants."  And when, last November, President Obama lawlessly granted amnesty to some 5 million of those immigrants, Ramos touted the measure as "a triumph for the Latino community."

Jorge Ramos Has a Long History of Activist 'Reporting'.  Ramos has been called the "Walter Cronkite of Latino America," but he has a history of behaving more like an activist with a cable-news platform than a reporter.  Ramos constantly identifies with his Latino and immigrant audience, using words like "us" and "our" when reporting on any immigration-related issue.  He seems to see himself as the gatekeeper of Latino American opinion — and to think that qualifies him to be a political kingmaker.

For a 'Silenced' Journalist, Jorge Ramos Sure Is Getting a Lot of Air Time.  A couple of days ago, I had no idea who Jorge Ramos was.  I imagine many others were likewise unfamiliar with the Univision newscaster before Donald Trump made him famous by kicking him out of a press conference.  Among several media appearances since the confrontation with Trump on Tuesday, Ramos was on The Kelly File Wednesday night. [...] First of all, can we bask ever so briefly in the irony of being "silenced" on national television, then getting to rant about it ad nauseam on all the major networks?  This guy has been anything but silenced.  He should send Trump a thank you note for the exposure.

The Media Lies, AGAIN, About Donald Trump's Illegal Alien Enforcement Proposals — Completely Manufactured Claims.  Having watched an entire media cycle of punditry pontificate about Donald Trump proposing to deport "by force" 11 to 42 million illegal aliens we find ourselves shaking our heads at how little the MSM think of the viewing audience.  NOWHERE in Donald Trump's proposal does he say, or advocate for, the mass "rounding up and subsequent deportation" of millions of illegal aliens.  He never said it, he never proposed it, and it doesn't exist in his presented Border Solution and Illegal Alien proposal.  It just doesn't exist, yet the media claim it to be so.

PolitiFact and Planned Parenthood: Erroneous Fact Checks All the Way Down.  Planned Parenthood now finds itself being heavily criticized after being caught on tape brokering fetal body parts.  Fortunately for them, they have no shortage of allies in the media, including PolitiFact.  Fox Business reporter Sandra Smith recently said on air "Almost 95 percent of all (Planned Parenthood) pregnancy services were abortions."  On Tuesday, PunditFact, a division of PolitiFact, rated it false.  PolitiFact concedes the source of this statistic is Planned Parenthood's own annual report.  If you take the number of services listed in the report, exclude the ones that don't apply to women who aren't pregnant, you do indeed get a figure that showing that over 94 percent of pregnant women who go to Planned Parenthood get an abortion.

Cahoots:
Email Reveals Hillary Clinton Was Fed Questions Before Meet the Press Appearance.  One of the private Hillary Clinton emails released Friday [7/31/2015] reveals that an NBC source was leaking possible questions to the then-Secretary of State's staff ahead of an appearance on Meet the Press.  In an July 2009 email with the subject line "heads up," Clinton staffer Lissa Muscatine wrote, "You probably already know this, but I just heard from a friend who is wired at Meet the Press that David Gregory will ask you about David Maziar, the Newsweek journalist arrested in Iran."

Muhammad... Muhammad... Where Have I Heard That Name Before?  In the wake of the latest mass shooting, carried out by Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez, an engineer like so many Islamic terrorists, we are seeing the usual scramble to avoid stating the obvious.  On CNN, Tom Fuentes ludicrously cautioned that Muhammad is not an Islamic name: [...]

New York Times Debunked: Scott Walker's 'I'm Not Going Nativist' Conversation Never Happened.  A conversation about immigration between Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and the Heritage Foundation's Stephen Moore, reported on by the New York Times this week, never happened.  "We have spoken with Stephen Moore and the conversation that was reported did not happen and he will tell you that.  I would recommend you reach out to him," Walker spokeswoman AshLee Strong told Breitbart News on Thursday [7/2/2015] in response to an article by Jonathan Martin and Maggie Haberman.

Fanning the Flames of Another Black-Church-Arson Hoax.  On Monday [6/29/2015], a Baltimore Sun lead editorial decried "a series of mysterious fires at African-American churches across the South" in the wake of the Charleston murders.  The newspaper cited a "pattern" of attacks, including what it claimed was an "uptick in attacks on 37 black churches in the South" in the 1990s that "prompted President Bill Clinton to set up a church-arson investigative task force."  The Sun neglected to mention that Clinton had falsely claimed at the time that he had "vivid and painful memories of black churches being burned in my own state when I was a child" — an assertion immediately debunked by the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette.

Gallup Poll: Confidence in Police Rates Twice That of Mainstream Media.  "None of this should surprise anyone," [John] Nolte stated, because "certain members of the police force have been caught doing some truly terrible things, no question.  But these are individual incidents in individual precincts.  "On the other hand, time and again and again as an institution," he indicated, "the mainstream media has been caught red-handed lying, fabricating evidence and engaging in the kind of corruption that would put any other institution (the National Football League, police, the Koch brothers) out of business."

An NBC Affiliate Manufactures a Story to Attack Conservatives.  "Months before the conference, my family booked a hotel room at the same resort as ALEC," reported Brendan Keefe of WXIA TV, also known as 11 Alive.  It's the NBC affiliate in Atlanta.  "We found the fabled back room where the laws are made," he told their audience.  It was sweeps week and NBC had a scoop.  What he failed to mention is that the event held by the right-leaning American Legislative Exchange Council was open to the press, he did not register for the event, he registered at the hotel under an assumed name, and the hotel was not a resort, just a hotel in Savannah.  More particularly, it was the Hyatt in Savannah.

Our Biggest Problem Is A Lying, Stinking Media.  [Scroll down]  But the truth is that the lies of the press are nothing new.  It can be traced back to the 1930's with Stalin apologist Walter Durant's lies about the Soviet Union that won him a Pulitzer Prize.  Yes, he was a New York Times correspondent, of course.  It has taken over seventy years for the Pulitzer Prize committee to review Durant's denial about the desperate condition of the Russian people under Stalin and to consider revoking that prize but why bother since that prize has been a joke for many years?  The Pulitzer Prize was awarded to the Times-Picayune newspaper for totally fraudulent reporting of the Katrina disaster.

Researcher Behind Fabricated Gay Marriage Study LIED About Funding.  Michael LaCour, the University of California-Los Angeles graduate student responsible for a now-widely discredited study on attitudes towards gay marriage, apparently lied about the funding grants given for his fraudulent research.  In fact, according to The New Yorker, LaCour received no funding at all for the study — which was published last December in Science magazine and discredited earlier this week — into whether views on same-sex marriage change due to interaction with gay individuals.

What's Behind Big Science Frauds?  In December, Science published a paper claiming that people could change their minds about same-sex marriage after talking for just 20 minutes with a gay person.  It seemed too good to be true — and it was.  On Wednesday [5/20/2015], the journal distanced itself from the study, after its accuracy was disputed, and one of the authors could not back up the findings.  News organizations, which had reported on the study, scrambled to correct the record.

MSNBC: America killing Muslims 'in the streets for decades" explains Garland shootings.  If there's an attack on American's anywhere, I think there's a law that there has to be someone on MSNBC to defend the attackers.  They always seems to get TV time.

Interracial Crime: Media-driven versus Statistical Realities.  The much-hyped "black killed by whites" stories sold to us over the past several years by the media and Race Industry have been either outright lies or grossly misreported.

Never Trust Liberal "Fact Checkers".  The Democratic Party controls almost all of the news media.  Some years ago, the Democrats came up with a great idea:  they established "fact checkers" within Democratic Party newspapers to spin unfortunate facts in the Democrats' favor.  Today, several such "fact checkers" are well known.  Are they reliable?  Of course not.

Math Is Hard For Obamacarians.  If you are masochistic enough to read the "reporting" of the legacy media on Obamacare, you will have noticed a spate of recent stories with titles like the following from CNBC:  "Health spending post-Obamacare seen $2.5 trillion lower."  This headline is not only awkwardly worded.  It is, like the article over which it appears, misleading.  It misrepresents a new study from the left-leaning Urban Institute concerning projected health care spending in a way that suggests the nation has saved enormous amounts of money thanks to the "Affordable Care Act."  This is absurd, of course, but it highlights an underappreciated element of the health care reform debate — the adversarial relationship that exists between Obamacare's partisans in the press and basic statistics.

Another Great Moment in Mainstream Journalism.  This story, like the now-completely discredited Rolling Stone "campus rape" article, shows the dangers of an increasingly biased mainstream news media.  Stories that fits reporters' and editors' ideological predispositions get rushed through into print with little skepticism or careful review, and apparently with no actual fact checking.

Libel Is Obama's Latest Weapon In His War On Israel.  Behold what's buried in Tuesday's [3/24/2015] Wall Street Journal — a claim of Israeli spying, which was obviously planted by one or more nameless administration officials seeking to make the Israelis' newly re-elected leader look like a U.S. enemy:  "While U.S. intelligence officials believe secured U.S. communications are relatively safe from the Israelis, they say European communications are vulnerable."  The Israelis, it turns out, almost certainly got their information from eavesdropping not on U.S., but on European and Iranian diplomatic communications — which virtually every U.S. embassy in the world does.

NYTs Caught Manipulating Story That Didn't Fit Their Narrative.  In a story published Monday [3/16/2015], The New York Times reported online that family members of Jeffrey Williams, the 20 year-old man suspected of shooting and wounding two Ferguson police officers, confirmed that Williams had been one of the Ferguson protesters.  This morning, at the same url, that crucial piece of news disappeared from the story.  No update or editor's note explained the removal (that has now been returned).

The Biggest Lie of Our Generation: Ferguson Was All About Traffic Tickets
Hands up, don't shoot?  Lie.
Gentle giant?  Lie.
Minding his own business?  Lie.
Shot in the back?  Lie.
Did not attack the police officer?  Lie.
'Didn't do nothing' to the Asian shopkeeper?  Lie.
Relatives did not try to start a riot?  Lie.
Protests were "largely peaceful?"  Lie.
National Guard would protect the business owners from looting...
This is a very long list of of the bodyguard of lies that reporters and activists (sorry for the redundancy) hoped would protect anyone from challenging the core truth of the racial grievance industry, which is the biggest lie of this generation:  Black people are relentless victims of relentless white racism.  All the time.  Everywhere.  That explains everything.  And it is not just Ferguson.  Lying about race and racial violence is now the default position for American reporters.

DOJ Report States "Hands Up — Don't Shoot" Narrative Was Completely False — We Again Explain Its Origin.  Today [3/4/2015] the DOJ released their comprehensive finding report on the Mike Brown shooting.  The DOJ Report states unequivocally the "Hands Up - Don't Shoot" narrative was a completely false construct, but yet the media ran with it for months.  Why?

Petraeus Set To Plead Guilty — Remove Himself From The Clutches Of Obama/Clinton Blackmail.  CNN is reporting, through Evan Perez again, that General David Petraeus is expected to plead guilty to a federal probe that he gave classified pillow-talk intelligence to Paula Broadwell during their affair in 2011/2012.  It should be noted, however, that Evan Perez was recently the CNN reporter who presented an entirely false story about a DHS report on Soverign Citizens where he portrayed the report as DHS worried about right-wing extremist groups.  Nothing in his interpretation of the report was even remotely accurate [...]

JW Exposes Another NBC Scandal Days Before Brian Williams Debacle.  The mainstream media's credibility continues to deteriorate at a breakneck rate and now a major network television station — with recent transgressions exposed by Judicial Watch and a U.S. military newspaper — is serving as the poster child of this shameful movement.  It involves two popular and "respected" journalists at NBC, disgraced "Nightly News" anchor Brian Williams and "Meet the Press" anchor David Gregory, two of the highest paid and most coveted personalities in the network's history.

AP: Islam Fundamentally a Religion of Peace, 'Brazen' Critics Probably Racist.  AP writer Lee Keath published an article on Monday dealing with the "debate among Muslims over interpreting faith" — without mentioning that thousands of deaths are meted out every year in the name of Islam across the globe.  Keath instead describes those who question the link between Islam and jihadist violence as "increasingly brazen."  Rather than focusing on the "brazenness" of the murderers in Islam's name, the author instead points towards those who dare critique the Religion of Peace.

Obama's Endless Lies and His Media Accomplices.  It was appropriate that the Democratic Senate report on "torture" was released on the same day that Jonathan Gruber was testifying about lying to the American people regarding the benefits of Obamacare.  The Senate report was another form of deception, designed to confuse and mislead about what Obama has used in place of interrogation techniques of terrorists.  Obama doesn't interrogate terrorists, he kills them.  Yet, we are led to believe Obama believes in American values and practices them.  The American people would see through the lies if only they could depend on a media that would lead them out of all the deliberate obfuscation.

Why The Media's Fact Problems Are Way Bigger Than Rolling Stone.  It's absolutely true that we don't have a wave of outright fabrication-out-of-whole-cloth.  But what we have is much worse.  We have a tsunami of inaccuracy that is generally tolerated, embraced and even celebrated so long as it serves the right political and cultural goals.

NBC's Snyderman faces credibility issues.  NBC must now decide whether Snyderman's credibility is too damaged for her to continue reporting on Ebola or other medical issues and, if so, for how long.

The Mike Brown PBS "Lie Chart" — The False PBS Claims Deconstructed Visually.  A Treeper has been reviewing every piece of testimony in the case and comparing it with the chart that PBS published.  Turns out they misrepresented almost all of the statements.

Ex-Obama Aide Destroys Media Narrative, Admits Gruber Was an 'Important Figure'.  A former adviser to Barack Obama on Tuesday [11/18/2014] overturned the media narrative, promoted by the President, that Jonathan Gruber was an unimportant, minor figure.  The New York Times on Tuesday insisted in an editorial, "Republicans are crowing over Mr. Gruber's remarks because he has been portrayed as a major architect of the health reform law.  In truth, his role was limited."  The health care operative has repeatedly bragged about fooling "stupid" Americans.  The paper's editors lectured, "His comments should not be taken as evidence that the reform law was hatched in secrecy and foisted on the public by trickery."  Yet, Steven Rattner, a former Obama administration adviser, countered this narrative on Morning Joe.

ABC and NBC Ignore Gruber's Numerous W.H. Visits, CBS Barely Covers.  On Tuesday, the Wall Street Journal reported that Jonathan Gruber, one of the architects of ObamaCare, made more than a dozen visits to visit the White House since "Democrats began drafting the law in 2009."  Despite the latest developments in the Gruber controversy, which contradicts President Obama's line that Gruber was "some advisor who never worked on our staff," CBS This Morning was the only network morning show to mention the report, giving it a mere 24 seconds during its Tuesday morning [11/18/2014] broadcast.  ABC's Good Morning America and NBC's Today ignored the Journal's report altogether.

More about the Jonathan Gruber ObamaCare scandal.

Chuck Todd: Eric Holder is a 'Very Non-Political Person'.  [Meet the Press host Chuck] Todd says this of the man who openly talked about serving "my people" as attorney general.  He made that comment in connection with the New Black Panther case — a racially-tinged case that Holder's DOJ dropped even after the government had won it.  Eric Holder desperately wants to treat al Qaeda terrorists as criminals rather than non-state illegal combatants.  That's a political choice, and one for which he has been roundly criticized.  When Holder attempted to move trials of al Qaeda terrorists from military tribunals to civilian court — in New York — he lost.  Big.  Being obtuse to the viewpoints of others, and being unable to comprehend that the things that you say and do offend and anger others, is not the same thing as being "non-political."

Best of facts-free reporting hands-down... I mean up.  I began to lose interest in Ferguson, Mo., when it was first reported that the late Michael Brown was an "aspiring rapper."  Hadn't heard that one yet?  It was in the LA Times, under the headline:  "Michael Brown's raps: Money, sex, drugs — and a vulnerable side."  Of course he had to have a vulnerable side.  That's why he was known as "the Gentle Giant."  He didn't look terribly gentle in that closed-circuit video, shoving the owner of the Ferguson Market when he was stealing the box of Swisher Sweets just before he got shot.  But the demonstrators could see right through that — "the man" had photoshopped the video, or so they said live on national TV.

The Media Are Buying Hillary's Foreign Policy [Prevarication] — And Selling It To You.  Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton — the most senior foreign policy official in the United States, aside from President Barack Obama himself, for four years — is now attempting to differentiate herself from her old boss, now that his hapless leadership has become a liability to her presidential ambitions.  And the media are buying it, then re-selling it to the public as if it represents an authentic split instead of opportunism and lies.

5 Reasons Not to Trust the 'What Me Worry' Media About Ebola.  [#5] The mainstream media lies.  It lies all the time.  The mainstream media is a degenerate, habitual, serial liar that exists only to serve the government and the noxious little career-climbing bubble it exists in.  I always assume the media is lying — that way I'm right more than I'm wrong.  The mainstream media is a wretched institution populated with wretched people and only a handful of exceptions.  If you're foolish enough to believe the mainstream media will put what's morally good, right, and true above The Club Rules, you obviously haven't watched CNN's coverage of the war in Gaza.

The Self-Inflicted Hamas 'Massacre' Blamed By the Media on Israel.  According to the Hamas version of events — widely promulgated in the media by ITN, the Telegraph and the Belfast Telegraph — an Israeli airstrike on a crowded market place during a partial ceasefire in the Shijaiyah neighbourhood of Gaza City on July 30th, 2014 was responsible for the deaths of 17 people, including blue-helmeted photojournalist Rani Rayan.  However as Thomas Wictor has incontrovertibly demonstrated using close analysis of film footage of the incident, the deaths were not caused by Israeli shrapnel but by secondary explosions from a vast cache of Hamas rockets.  Oh, and the market wasn't 'crowded' either:  it had been closed for the day.  And this particular area wasn't included in the ceasefire zone, either, because Hamas was continuing to fire rockets from it.

Gallup: Public Confidence in TV News at All-Time Low.  Public confidence in television news is at an all-time low, according to a survey released today [6/19/2014] by Gallup. [...] In the latest survey, conducted June 5-8, only 10 percent said they had "a great deal" of confidence in T.V. news, and 8 percent said they had "quite a lot" of confidence.

Gallup: Public Confidence in TV News at All-Time Low.  Public confidence in television news is at an all-time low, according to a survey released today by Gallup.  Only 18 percent of the Americans surveyed expressed either a "great deal" or "quite a lot" of confidence in that news medium.

Dana Milbank's Heritage disaster.  Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank set off a flurry of outraged tweets on Monday night [6/16/2014] after posting a highly critical recap of a panel event at The Heritage Foundation that, he says, "deteriorated into the ugly taunting of a woman in the room who wore an Islamic head covering."  Video of that panel has since surfaced and — in my view — Milbank grossly misrepresented the nature of that exchange.

Friends Don't Let Friends Read Dana Milbank.  Dana Milbank is a columnist for the Washington Post who serially exaggerates or distorts what he writes about.  It's just what he does.  This has been established so many times by so many people that it's disappointing to see he is still given prominent perch in his paper and that people who made it past their sophomore year in high school take him seriously.

What Dana Milbank Does Not Tell You.  [Scroll down]  But what's more, Milbank relies on the account of "Saba Ahmed, an American University law student," who is the aggrieved victim of his piece.  She's a moderate, caring Muslim girl targeted by the group because she is Muslim.  What Milbank does not tell you is that Saba Ahmed is a family friend of Mohammed Osman Mohamud, the convicted Islamic bomber who tried to blow up Portland, OR in the name of jihad.  Milbank also does not tell you Saba Ahmed has been arrested for stalking and her family claims she was diagnosed with a mental disorder.  She's also been active at Occupy rallies denouncing American war efforts.  She has made opposition to the American war against terrorism a key part of what she does.  And she took to Heritage to hijack a conversation on Benghazi, turning it to her issue, which had not even been a topic of conversation.

Washington Post Lets Columnist Dana Milbank Lie About Heritage Foundation.  Writing for a Washington Post that apparently decided his column was too good to check, columnist Dana Milbank attacked the conservative Heritage Foundation for bullying a female Muslim woman who expressed concern about Muslim stereotyping during a panel Monday night.  The only problem with Milbank's charge is that it's a smear — it never happened.  And of all places, it is video from the left-wing Media Matters that debunks Milbank's entire column.

MSNBC.com Deceptively Edits Dave Brat to Suggest He Was 'Dodging' Questions.  Editors at MSNBC.com trimmed down Republican congressional nominee Dave Brat's June 11 phone interview with MSNBC's Chuck Todd in order to paint him as dodging questions from the Daily Rundown host.  But a review of the full interview shows that Brat had already and seemingly quite gladly answered a few policy questions on such hot issues as the minimum wage, immigration reform, and his stance on Wall Street's influence on the business wing of the GOP.

Six Lies The Leftist Media Tells About The Contraception Mandate Cases.  This week, the Supreme Court will consider whether businesses and their owners must choose between paying millions of dollars in fines and violating their religious beliefs.  [...] The leftist papers do not mention the substantial monetary burden put on religious business owners to violate their consciences.  The papers do not mention that contraception was both inexpensive and widely available before the contraception mandate, and still is.  The papers omit to mention that it isn't the businesses who have radically changed, but the mandates from government.  Quite simply, if you read a newspaper to find out about the contraception mandate cases, you will read lies.

Jacksonville Channel 4 falsely portrays black on white hate crime attacks as having a white perpetrator.  For years we have talked about how the media censors black crime.  Many major media outlets now openly admit to having a policy of censoring black crime perpetrators.  However, an even more sinister form of censorship is rising.  This is what we call Stage 2 censorship of black crime.  Where the media purposely leads you to believe that a black crime perpetrator was actually a white guy.

Appalling: NY Times editorial distorts, misleads, and lies to readers on HHS Mandate.  With many political debates, I try to give opponents the benefit of the doubt on intentions.  Sure, raising taxes is a bad thing, but some politicians and pundits believe higher taxes will benefit society.  Some people think we need to spend more, and others really fear climate change.  When it comes to the HHS abortifacient/contraception/sterilization mandate, however, I've almost stopped being that generous with the left's media and thought leaders.  [A recent] New York Times Magazine editorial is a prime example as to why.  Almost from start to finish, the piece misleads and misdirects readers about the mandate, its opponents, and religious freedom.

Yet Another Journalist Says Lying Is A-OK.  It's a relatively new development for journalists to admit that lying to the public isn't a bad thing, but it's a rapidly growing phenomenon, as sophistry becomes an increasingly accepted practice in the MSM, to the point where it's openly talked about by those who employ it.

Radio DJs spark outrage after admitting they made up story about a homophobic RSVP to a party.  Two radio DJs in Long Island who caused an uproar last week by posting the homophobic RSVP to a birthday party for a 'little girl with two gay dads' admitted on Saturday that the whole thing was a hoax.

Cybersecurity Expert Accuses NBC of '100% Fraudulent' Hacking Story, NBC Fires Back.  Earlier this week, NBC's Richard Engel filed a report warning travelers to Sochi about the danger of getting hacked, but one cybersecurity expert took serious issue with the story, which he described on his blog as "100% fraudulent."  In the report, Engel brought some brand-new laptops and a new phone just to test how secure people's devices would be in Sochi, and he concluded that he was hacked "almost immediately."  But Robert Graham pointed out a few reasons why all is not as it seems.

NBC News Fails to Disclose Soros Connection In Shriver Report on Women.  The Media Research Center reports that a report promoted heavily by NBC News Special Anchor Maria Shriver was funded by a ultra-left political group funded by George Soros.  Earlier this week Shriver was all over NBC News and MSNBC to talk about a study titled "The Shriver Report: A Woman's Nation Pushes Back From the Brink."  The promotion of the report also allowed Shriver and NBC News to portray President Obama as "sympathetic to working mothers."  This push focusing on women we see throughout the media, not just on NBC, is nothing more than the media prepping the battlefield to elect Hillary Clinton.

Five Years of Falsehoods at NBC News.  Everyone acted surprised when we learned yesterday that after a couple of disastrous months, MSNBC is defiantly refusing to change their editorial process.  But why would they?  For years now, MSNBC and NBC News have both become a culture of left-wing hate and fraudulent editing.  The only thing new, as you will see [in this article], is that the frequency of the fraud and hate is increasing.  What I've assembled here isn't anything close to comprehensive, but it is a revealing top ten: [...]

Ripping Off the "Progressive" Mask.  It is a sad fact that telling a lie these days has become more convenient than telling the truth.  This is a terrible commentary on those with access to our major media.  Consider the coverage of the inauguration of Bill de Blasio as New York City's mayor.  The term "progressive" is used in most accounts to describe him and his backers.  De Blasio accepts that term.  Yet, by any objective measure, he is a dedicated Marxist, and has been for most of his life.  For example, he never disavowed his support for the communist Sandinistas in Nicaragua.  He claims to have honeymooned in communist Cuba, when such a trip was illegal.  His wife was a member of a Marxist collective.

NBC News' Happy Obamacare Customer is a Dem Candidate, Operative.  NBC News senior health reporter JoNel Aleccia told the story of a woman described as "Joyce Moore, a Pennsylvania financial planner" who "runs her own retirement and estate planning business."  NBC said Moore was actually happy her existing insurance was canceled due to Obamacare. [...] What NBC News Senior Health Reporter JoNel Aleccia failed to mention is that Joyce Moore is a longstanding Democratic activist who, in November 2013, ran as a Democratic candidate for Upper Milford Township Supervisor in Pennsylvania.

10 Forms of 2013 Media Malpractice.  [#1] Pretend that "no one" is saying something, when they really are.  Carol Costello of CNN claimed in January that "no one is talking about overturning the Second Amendment or confiscating guns in America."  In the three preceding weeks, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo had said that "confiscation could be an option"; an Iowa state representative had "said governments should start confiscating semi-automatic rifles and other firearms"; and Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein of California had suggested a gun-buyback program which "could be compulsory."  In early December, New York City's police department sent out "letters telling gun owners to turn over their rifles and shotguns — or else face the consequences," i.e., confiscation.

Journalistic malpractice over Benghazi.  The Times' report misconstrues known facts and simply sweeps under the table mountains of evidence of al Qaeda's ties to Libyan jihadi groups.  In June 2012, for example, more than a dozen different jihadi groups put the black flag of al Qaeda on parade in Benghazi in what they hoped would be a three-day show of force.  Thousands of jihadi fighters, many of them in Pakistani and Afghan dress, paraded through the streets of Benghazi with hundreds of gun trucks.  For The New York Times, though, the black flags were merely "the black flags of militant Islam" and apparently bore no relation to al Qaeda.  "Benghazi was not infiltrated by al Qaeda," The Times flatly asserted.

House Intel Chairman on NYT's Benghazi Report: 'That Story Is Just Not Accurate'.  The New York Times on Sunday [12/29/2013] published a highly controversial report claiming the September 2012 attack on our consulate in Benghazi, Libya, did not involve al Qaeda, and was as the Administration originally stated a spontaneous demonstration in response to an American-made anti-Islamic video.  Appearing on Fox News Sunday, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) completely refuted the article saying, "[T]hat story is just not accurate".

Denver Post Stealth Edits Out 'Socialist' from Profile of Arapahoe School Shooter.  In a profile on the shooter in the Denver Post which focused on his "strong political beliefs," several of Pierson's classmates offered their impressions of the shooter.  One of the shooter's classmates described him as a "very opinionated socialist."  Shortly after that post was published, however, that description was edited out.  The current copy simply describes him as "very opinionated."

Mika Suggests Obama 'Too Smart' For The Job.  Too smart to be President.  Is that really Barack Obama's problem? Mika Brzezinski thinks so.  On today's [11/4/2013] Morning Joe, as Mike Barnicle and John Heilemann kicked around the notion, as others have before, that President Obama doesn't much like politics and the people in it, Brzezinski piped up with a different explanation for his aloofness:  he's "too smart for the job," she suggested.

The Editor says...
I can provide copious evidence that Barack H. Obama is not all that bright.

WashPost's Milbank: 'Couldn't Be the Case' That Some Lost Insurance Because of ObamaCare.  On Monday's PoliticsNation, Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank claimed that it "couldn't be the case at this time" that ObamaCare is already causing people to lose their current health insurance plans, in spite of all the documented cases insurance companies canceling plans as they struggle to comply with ObamaCare regulations.

The Shutdown that Ruined Christmas?  [Scroll down]  On the very first night, Oct. 1, NBC already sounded like a DNC campaign commercial.  Reporter John Yang highlighted an EPA worker in Chicago, Elizabeth Lytle, who had already filed for unemployment benefits. [...] Despite her $52,000-a-year salary, Lytle is an experienced "victim."  Back in March, the eco-news site Greenwire also focused on her suffering from sequestration. [...] Here, too, was ethical fraud:  NBC and other outlets didn't say so, but Lytle had been previously featured in the media by her union, the American Federation of Government Employees.

The AP Misreports the Debt Ceiling.  I wrote here that no matter what happens with the debt limit, the federal government will not default on its debt obligations.  I also noted here that Moody's — which certainly ought to know — agrees that there is zero chance of default on Treasury bonds.  In recent days, many more commentators have made the same point.  The government is legally obligated to recognize its debt obligations, and the existing $17 trillion debt can be serviced on less than ten percent of federal revenue.  So there simply can't be a default.

The Planned Destruction of America.  One world is where the television and radio pundits sanctimoniously scold us into believing that all is normal, and everything we see taking place today is merely the result of a growing acrimonious relationship between two political parties.  They sit behind the microphones, in front of the TV cameras, write the newsprint, and dominate the internet with their matrix of mendacity.  They are well-paid for keeping the public in the dark, and by confining public discourse to the limitations of mere political theater.  Regardless of their political bent, they bully and mock those who disagree, and sneer at those who dare threaten the illusion of normalcy.  The other world is what is really taking place behind the scenes.

Limbaugh Bashes 'Journalistic Malpractice' Attacking GOP Over Gov't Shutdown.  Rush Limbaugh took the media to task Monday [9/30/2013] for foisting all the blame of a potential government shutdown on Republicans.  Limbaugh predicted in the next few days the media would write piece after piece about all the programs getting shut down during the shutdown and blaming Republican intransigence on the whole thing.  He referred to the AP article above as "basically a press release from the Democrat party" that accuses Republicans of hating Obama so much they're willing to let millions of people go without health care.

Little Media Lies About ObamaCare.  [Scroll down]  Obama signed House bills to kill a costly ObamaCare reporting rule, terminate its long-term care insurance program and repeal the "free choice voucher" program.  He also signed bills cutting funds for the so-called CO-OP program, a public health slush fund and other ObamaCare programs.  Two other House-passed bills — one to end the Independent Payment Advisory Board and another terminating the medical device tax — have strong bipartisan support.  Another simply codified the employer mandate delay Obama himself had already ordered.  Yet the media pretend these things never happened.

BBC claims Tamerlan Tsarnaev motivated by "right-wing" literature, not radical Islam.  With all the efforts to tie the Tea Party and "right wing" to violence committed by others, it wouldn't be long before the Islamic radical Boston bomber Tamerlan Tsarnaev was tied to "right-wing" causes.  With the slenderest of proof, The BBC goes there.

How the Media Has Distorted a Tragedy.  [Scroll down]  This narrative has perpetuated the lie that Zimmerman's history of calls to the police indicates obsessive racial paranoia.  Thus, discussing the verdict on the PBS NewsHour, University of Connecticut professor and New Yorker contributor Jelani Cobb asserted that "Zimmerman had called the police 46 times in previous six years, only for African-Americans, only for African-American men."  Actually, only six calls — two of them about Trayvon Martin — had to do with African-American men.

Defending American Principles Is Now a Revolutionary Act.  The [George Zimmerman] case was a joke, but you wouldn't know that if you only listened to the mainstream media.  The media's rank speculation, mischaracterization of the evidence and outright lies were designed to replace the strict adherence to law and the rules of evidence that for a thousand years have protected the accused from the mindless fury of the mob.

Key Witness for Zimmerman Grand Jury Changes Story.  We wrote yesterday [10/31/2014] about the "October Surprise/Get Out the Vote" announcement by a flailing Obama administration that the Department of Justice will be holding a Grand Jury hearing next Wednesday regarding possible federal civil rights charges against George Zimmerman.  The only named witness for Wednesday's hearing is Frank Taaffe, a self-declared "friend" for George Zimmerman.  Earlier this year Taaffe suddenly announced that he believed Zimmerman had a racial, not merely self-defense, motive in killing Trayvon Martin.  This would be more than two years after the shooting occurred.

More lies from the main stream media about the Zimmerman case.  The claim that Zimmerman was at fault because he pursued Martin after being told not to has absolutely no basis in fact.  It is a made up assumption that has been repeated so many times by the media that people actually believe that is what happened.  The 911 call that was placed by Zimmerman is on the web in both audio and written transcript form.  It was played numerous times at the trial.  There is no excuse for continuing to lie about the evidence.  The Chicago Tribune should know better than to continue to perpetuate lies that have fueled so much anger over this case.

Just report the news, don't generate it.
TX Lt. Gov: Reporters Tried To Inflame Pro-Abortion Protesters.  Texas Lt. Governor David Dewhurst told HotAir's Ed Morrissey that his office received reports that reporters were actively encouraging and rallying pro-abortion protesters during State Sen. Wendy Davis' fillibuster last week.

Media misreporting rampant in Trayvon Martin case.  A combination of pressure through social media and poor journalism led to the trial of George Zimmerman, who is accused of second-degree murder in last year's shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin.  Immediately after the shooting in Sanford, Fla., which is 20 miles northeast of Orlando, the media described Mr. Zimmerman as white, setting up the racially divisive meme of a white man killing a black teenager — a characterization that proved to be wrong.

Number Seven: NBC News Again Caught Selectively Editing Video.  Deceptive journalistic practices at NBC News show no sign of slowing down.  This latest attempt to selectively edit audio/video in order to benefit Barack Obama represents the seventh such act of willful, intentional journalistic malpractice.  NBC News is already being sued over one instance involving George Zimmerman.

WaPo Quietly Changes Key Details in NSA Story.  The gist is that the Washington Post has quietly made major edits to its initial story about the NSA's PRISM program, without acknowledging that any changes have been made at all.  Many of the changes are stylistic, but many are factual.

Update:
Busted Again: Washington Post Stealth Edits Obama/Africa Story.  For the second time in a week, The Washington Post has been caught editing a major story without noting publicly that the story has been changed.

CNN Launches Dishonest Attack On Clarence Thomas — To Protect Voter Fraud.  CNN published an article by John Blake entitled "Three questions for Clarence Thomas" that allows them to not only distort the black conservative judge's opinions, but also to tip-toe on the edge of racism, referring to Justice Thomas as a "sellout" and "Uncle Thomas" while hiding behind the cowardly journalistic trick of "Hey, we're just reporting what other people say!"

Propaganda: NPR Incorrectly Claims IRS Has Nothing to do With Obamacare.  During the May 22 broadcast of National Public Radio's "Talk of the Nation," host Neil Conan repeatedly contradicted a guest by claiming that the IRS has nothing at all to do with Obamacare.  NPR's Conan is, of course, completely incorrect.  The IRS is up to its Tea Party harassing neck in Obamacare.  The guest Conan contradicted was Kellyanne Conway, a Republican strategist and pollster.  Conway was on to discuss the various scandals in which Obama is mired and close to the end of her segment she questioned how the American people can trust the IRS to implement Obamacare.  Conan initially pressed her on the claim saying that she must have "misspoken."

NBC News Again Caught Selectively Editing Video.  I had hoped this nonsense would end with the reign of Steve Capus, but once again we have NBC News forced to apologize for yet-another dishonest edit meant to push the left's agenda.

News Media Keep Peddling Their Bush Vs. Gore Lie.  When Sandra Day O'Connor said she regretted her decision in Bush v. Gore, the press threw another fit about the "stolen" election.  They seem to forget their own studies proved the court's ruling didn't matter.

Newspaper caught photoshopping injuries out of Boston Marathon photograph.  A US newspaper has admitted that it digitally altered a front-page photograph of a Boston Marathon bombing victim so that the woman's pants covered her horrific leg wounds.  The woman's gory wounds had vanished on the large image that wrapped around the New York Daily News on Tuesday [4/16/2013], despite the photograph appearing unedited online and in other publications in the US.

The Top 50 Liberal Media Bias Examples.  [#12]  Fake Exploding GM Trucks:  In 1993 on its Dateline NBC program, NBC News was determined to smear trucks made by General Motors.  The TV newsers wanted to show America that the gas tanks in GM trucks were prone to exploding.  Dateline aired footage of just that causing a PR nightmare for GM.  Ultimately, NBC had viewers convinced that GM's "sidesaddle" gas tank was a hazard.  But in its zeal to destroy GM, NBC forgot to mention one little thing to the viewing public.  Its video of an exploding gas tank was little else but Hollywood special effects.

False Media Narrative: Hagel Filibuster 'Unprecedented'.  You'll hear it all over cable news and the networks and in every lede paragraph from the Washington Post to the LA Times:  Republicans are conducting an unprecedented filibuster of Chuck Hagel.  Where did the media get this buzz word that's repeated breathlessly by the obedient servants of the White House?  From the White House, of course.

Steve Capus Oversaw 'Erosion of Journalistic Values'.  You would think five documented instances of outright journalistic fraud from a single news division would result in a little more outrage from our journalistic overlords.  You would also think that those who believe in the ethics of their profession would speak out, or that those with competitive instincts would leap at the opportunity to ding a competitor.  But media has its own version of a the Blue Code of Silence.

Cape Cod Times says reporter fabricated sources in dozens of stories.  A Massachusetts daily newspaper apologized to its readers after an internal investigation concluded that a veteran reporter wrote dozens of stories that included people who don't exist.

Cutter: Yeah, we've been lying about the $5 trillion we said Romney's lying about.  As soon as Team Obama realized its excuse-making was getting embarrassing after the president's debate performance, they pivoted to a replay of the response to Rep. Paul Ryan's convention speech in Tampa.  They can't call either of them dumb, so they have to call them liars.  In the service of that narrative, they either present mere philosophical disagreements as "lies" or they dishonestly represent parts of Mitt Romney's plan to make him into a "liar."

Are the Media Telling the Truth About Romney's "Lies"?  [Scroll down]  Many reports have documented examples of stimulus money wasted on dubious projects or that benefited well-connected firms.  And [Paul] Ryan's overall complaint was that the money was "borrowed, spent, and wasted."  That may be hyperbole, but by Obama's own standards, the stimulus was hardly a success.  Just before he signed the stimulus, Obama promised it would "ignite spending by businesses and consumers," unleash "a new wave of innovation, activity and construction," and produce 4% economic growth this year.  None of which happened.

Report: Journalists Using Fake Names to Buy Obama Merchandise.  Several journalists have reportedly used fake names to buy Obama campaign merchandise inside media-only areas of the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, NC.

Were journalists using fake names to make Obama donations at the convention?  [Scroll down]  So the next time you hear a "journalist" pitching in with the sort of in-kind campaign contribution that Democrats love, even though they are very upset by the idea of other types of corporation participating in political speech, remember that he or she might be driving home in a car with a "Democrats Are Hot" bumper sticker, purchased under a fake name at the Democratic National Convention.

MSNBC's Chris Matthews claims to live in 'black majority' DC, but actually lives in Md. suburbs.  MSNBC host Chris Matthews might have exaggerated his abilities to hear dog-whistle racism at this week's Republican National Convention in Tampa, Newsbusters' Jack Coleman noted.  During Tuesday night's [8/28/2012] coverage, Matthews made the case that he is well-positioned to judge racial issues because of where he lives, after having repeatedly insinuated that Republican figures are racist.

Isaac Shows Media Bias Of Hurricane Proportions.  As Isaac bore down on New Orleans, the administration's media toadies preferred to talk not about substantive issues, but on how the "shadow of Bush and Katrina" hung over the delayed GOP convention in Tampa.

WaPo's Glenn Kessler Has Fact-Checking Tantrum Over 'You Didn't Build That'.  Glenn Kessler is The Washington Post's laughably biased fact checker, and when you think of Kessler, remember this — remember the "fact" checker who called Romney a liar for saying a president who didn't go to Israel didn't go to Israel.  This guy is utterly shameless, and this morning he's having a full-blown tantrum.

Mark Brown Declares Obama is not a Chicago Politician.  In a curious column the Sun-Time [sic] Mark Brown denies that President Obama has much to do with Chicago Politics.  Curious because the preponderance of evidence that Brown offers is that President Obama is a typical Chicago politician, working in league with donors and other politicians to fleece their consituents and taxpayers. [...] If being Emil Jones point man in Springfield, married to the daughter of a Precinct Committeman/water department employee, and having David Axelrod as a constant flack for many years doesn't qualify you as a Chicago politician, just what does?

Cutter: I'm Just Going to Make [Stuff] Up about Jobs.  Stephanie Cutter, deputy campaign manager for Obama's reelection effort, seems more a character out of fiction than a real person.  A high-octane spokesman, she is willing to say anything to win the 30-second sound byte cycle.  She will lie, contradict herself and make up stats on the fly to get through any single cable news appearance.  Its something real people, with a credibility gene, wouldn't do.  Fortunately, she's a Democrat, so the media will never really hold her statements to account.

NBC accused of deliberately editing footage of the women's team gymnastics.  Controversy over the coverage of the Olympics on American television deepened today when NBC was accused of deliberately editing footage of the women's team gymnastics in order to create what critics called "fake suspense."  Russian world champion Ksenia Afanasyeva's unexpected fall during the floor exercises, which effectively handed a gold medal to Team USA during an early stage of the contest, was inexplicably removed from the time-delayed version of events that NBC presented to its prime-time television viewers.

Faking and enhancing the sounds of the Olympics.  Ah, there's nothing quite like the serene "swoosh-swooshing" of oars in the water, as Olympic rowers glide along the water.  There really isn't, because those sounds spectators are hearing on their TVs are not live from the event, The Atlantic reported.  In order to keep sight of the boats, broadcasters must follow them with chase boats and a helicopter.  The result is that the sound of the rowing is drowned out by that noise.  So, NBC elected to replace the live audio with a recorded soundtrack of rowing practices to deliver more accurate depiction of what the sport sounds like in its pure form.

Media Invents Story That Chick-fil-A President Condemned Gay Marriage.  Last week, reports emerged that Chick-fil-A president Dan Cathy had condemned gay marriage.  It's no secret that the company is run by devout Christians, but this still caused an uproar.  Boston's mayor threatened to deny the company business permits, celebrities condemned the company, and the Muppets announced fast food chain wouldn't be able to license any new toys for their kids meals.  One small problem:  The president of Chick-fil-A never actually said anything condemning gay marriage.

TV Station Fires Anchor After He Fails to Disclose Connection to Atheist Group He Was Covering.  Jason Volentine, a former anchor for WXMI, a television station in Michigan, found himself without employment after failing to tell his employers about a relationship he had with the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF).  FFRF, an atheist activist group, is a non-profit that advocates for the separation of church and state, while fighting faith in the public square.  It wasn't Volentine's relationship, in itself, that was problematic — it was the fact that he had covered the non-profit group, but had purportedly failed to tell his employers and viewers about the relationship beforehand.

Nuts to Nutting: Under Obama, Real Spending Has Exploded.  On Tuesday, Rex Nutting of MarketWatch, who per his Linkedin profile is the site's Washington bureau chief, published a column titled "Obama spending binge never happened."  This column will show that it did, but that clever accounting has largely concealed its existence.

The Decline of The Washington Post.  [Scroll down]  The [WashingtonPost is running paid ads from the Russian and Chinese governments that are made to look like news sections of the paper.  The ads, some of them six pages long, even carry a facsimile of The Washington Post masthead.  In relatively small print it says they are paid supplements and have nothing to do with the paper's news or editorial departments.  But The Washington Post masthead or logo is more prominently featured. [...] Readers are thus given the impression that the propaganda has the approval of the Post.

Boston Globe Takes Credit for Breitbart Scoop.  Today the Boston Globe has a front-page, below-the-fold story titled "Filings raise more questions on Warren's ethnic claims."  It's a well-written take on documents and information first brought to light here at Breitbart News two weeks ago.  Unfortunately, it's presented as a scoop with no link or reference to the fact that the information has appeared previously in another publication.

Fox News Has a Van Jones Problem.  In the same way that Van Jones was exposed originally by New Zealand blogger Trevor Loudon by using Internet search engines to look into his controversial background and writings, over the course of just a few days Accuracy in Media has been able to determine the following about [Marc Lamont] Hill from public sources.

It's Not Just Scott Beauchamp.  Scott Beauchamp was the last straw.  I realized that I need a scorecard to keep track of all the fallen journalists, journalistic mistakes and major and minor screw-ups in the media. … Offenses include lying and fabricating, doctoring photos, plagiarism, conflicts of interest, falling for hoaxes, and overt bias.  Some are hilarious, such as an action figure doll being mistaken for a real soldier.  Some are silly, such as reporting on a baseball game watched on TV.  Some are more serious.

It's Not Just Scott Beauchamp — Part Two.  Without too much extra effort, it was fairly easy to add 21 more names to the "Media Hall of Shame" list, bringing the total to 83.  With more effort, I'm sure the total list could easily double.

In part three, the list grows to 101.
Media Dishonesty Matters.  Did you know that Time magazine and other news organizations had a Vietnamese communist on full-time staff in Vietnam during that war?  Do you remember that ABC, CBS and NBC have all rigged cars or trucks with explosives or other devices to make them look dangerous on TV, or that Consumer Reports lied about the Suzuki Samurai enough to put it out of business?

Is 'Journalistic Ethics' an Oxymoron?  The Founding Fathers thought a free and skeptical press was essential to the preservation of our political and economic liberties.  The First Amendment is first for just that reason.  What would they think of today's generation of reporters who hide from the truth, parrot the slogans of left-wing advocacy groups, fail to do their own research, and routinely give politicians a free ride?  My guess is they would be stunned.

Is news just the facts?  Not anymore.  When I entered the field the ideal was to "... tell it like it is."  Not what I would like it to be, but simply lay out the facts.  If one fact strongly supports a point of view we were obligated to seek other facts that would dispute it.  Unfortunately, many of today's instructors teach what is called, "advocacy journalism."

Playing with the numbers:  A UPI story a few months back reported that nearly 300,000 veterans are homeless on any given night.  If so, as blogger Megan McArdle pointed out a few weeks ago on Asymmetrical Information, that would mean that every single homeless person in America must have served in the armed forces, since 300,000 is about the total number of the homeless.

Opinion masquerading as journalism:
The Liberal media are living in cocoons.  Whenever you read the headline, "some say," you know you are reading the opinions of the reporter.  Some say the moon is made of green cheese, but what's the difference?  The story is only worth telling when "some say" what the reporter wants them to say.

Paper Uses Global Warming Activist's Press Release as News Story.  The Palm Beach Post was caught in a bit of deception by one of its readers over the weekend. ... Unfortunately for the reputation of Dara Kam and that of the paper, this "article" was merely a rewording of the press release of an environmentalist group calling themselves, Environment Florida.  An alert reader who wrote in calling them on it also exposed several other papers across the country that did the very same thing.

A Phony Tale Of Woe.  The story currently making the rounds about the guy who robbed a bank for $1 to get free jailhouse health care is supposed to expose how terrible our medical system is.  It actually exposes something worse.  It's a story tailor made for the news media. ... The fact that not one reporter trafficking this story bothered to point these facts out is an example of gross dereliction of duty or extreme bias — or both.

WaPo Author who Tied Romney to KKK Resigns over Plagiarism Scandal.  When Washington Post journalist Elizabeth Flock wrote a post last year falsely accusing Mitt Romney of using a Ku Klux Klan slogan in his campaign speech, she was not fired or disciplined.  But when Flock stole from the work of another mainstream organization and did not properly attribute, she abruptly "resigned" from the Washington Post conveniently and coincidentally before another editor's note went up on her post that described it as having "serious factual errors" and "a significant ethical lapse."





The Associated Press

Algerian boxer headline
Algerian boxer Imane Khelif clinches medal at Olympics after outcry fueled by gender misconceptions.  No excerpt or synopsis will be shown here, since the article starts out with an obvious lie in the headline.  If the boxer in question looks and talks and acts and punches like a man, he's probably a man; and if earlier tests revealed XY chromosomes, common sense will tell you he is a man.  There is no "misconception."

We Now Have Answers About Testing Done on Olympic Boxers Imane Khelif and Lin Yu-Ting.  Algerian boxer Imane Khelif gave an interview Sunday night [8/4/2024] urging folks to not bully Olympic athletes online, but her [sic] compassion was completely misplaced — it focused solely on her [sic], not the women she [sic] and fellow alleged XY-chromosome holder Lin Yu-Ting have physically bullied over the past week, women whose lifelong dreams were shattered. [...] Thanks to a Monday press conference held by the IBA we know at least a few tests Khelif has undergone, and that while the organization couldn't come right out and say it due to privacy laws, that those tests show she [sic] has XY chromosomes.  That should clear up some misconceptions.

The Editor says...
A person with XY chromosomes is a man.  A man pretending to be a woman is a transvestite, not a woman.

The AP Doggedly Looks for the Medical Records... of the Guy Not Running the Country.  [Scroll down]  As the media complex in this country continues to unravel before our eyes, the developments of Saturday's assassination attempt on Donald Trump continue to bedevil the press.  Of note has been the rise in the journalism ranks of those voices who — in defiance of years of them bleating about misinformation — are now entertaining the idea the attempt on Trump's life is either conspiratorial or, at the very least, being falsely dramatized by his campaign.  One of the latest theories percolating with some in the press is that Trump was not actually hit directly by a shooter, but he endured the effects of the glass shattering from the teleprompters.  Firstly, how is this in any way diminishing the point that there was an attempt on his life?!  If he was not actually struck by a sniper's bullet, then he was struck by glass from the teleprompter being shattered — by a sniper's bullet!  But the second item is more revealing.  There are those in the journalism environment forwarding this conspiracy without actually — get this — committing journalism.  If you even wanted to entertain this crackpot premise, would you not at least explore it as a possibility before blathering away?! All one needs to do is look at the footage from July 13, and what do you suppose it shows?  The teleprompters were intact after the episode.

Associated Press refuses to correct anti-gun story — another symptom of its decline.  Founded in 1846, the Associated Press describes itself as "the most trusted source of fast, accurate, unbiased news in all formats and the essential provider of the technology and services vital to the news business." [...] When the Associated Press makes an error, the damage is compounded because its wire stories have such a wide reach.  They're pushed out to AP members on multiple platforms — print, radio, television and digital — so corrections are a big deal, or at least they used to be.  Nowadays, however, whenever one of its correspondents writes about guns or the Second Amendment, the AP is just as inaccurate and just as biased as any other member of the legacy media — another symptom of its overall decline.

Green college degrees and phony climate calamities.  Last week an Associated Press headline declared, "Graduating seniors seek degrees in climate change and more US universities deliver." Keep in mind the AP, which feeds stories to news publications around the world, was given an $8 million grant in 2022 to promote the theory of human-caused climate change in its daily coverage.  The media giant's funding came from the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Quadrivium, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Walton Family Foundation.  In announcing the gift, the AP said it would be hiring twenty environmental reporters to "enhance the global understanding of climate change and its impact across the world."  The AP's climate desk isn't staffed by journalists.  These are activists bent on shaping opinions that are short on science and long on instilling fear.

AP Tries to Explain Why Noncitizen Voting is No Big Deal.  With more than ten million "new arrivals" in the country under Joe Biden's watch, increasing numbers of people have been expressing concerns over how many of them might wind up trying to vote in the upcoming elections.  Even worse, how many of them might get away with it?  This is a threat that has been brought up by Donald Trump recently, to the great alarm of his detractors in the legacy media.  But he was hardly the first to raise this specter.  Rushing to the rescue this weekend is the Associated Press.  They want to assure everyone that Donald Trump is just engaging in conspiracy theories again.  Noncitizen voting simply doesn't happen, or at least not enough that it should bother you.  Our voting system is safe and secure.  You know... just like our border.

AP Style Guide Aims to Silence Dissent From Climate Alarmist Narrative.  Most news outlets rely on The Associated Press style guide — officially known as the AP Stylebook — as the arbiter for grammar, spelling, and terminology in news coverage.  While AP puts forth its style guide as an impartial rubric for fair coverage, its rules often exclude conservative views from the outset.  Take AP's latest round of updates, released Friday.  The updates include guidance on how to avoid "stigmatizing" obese people, admonitions to avoid calling people "homeless" as it might be "dehumanizing," and warnings to avoid the term "female" since "some people object to its use as a descriptor for women because it can be seen as emphasizing biology and reproductive capacity over gender identity."  AP's style guide prefers "anti-abortion" and "abortion-rights" as adjectives, urging journalists to avoid "pro-life," "pro-choice," and "pro-abortion."  Yet one of the largest sections of the updated style guide involves "climate change," a term that AP says "can be used interchangeably" with the term "climate crisis."

Associated Press Admits It Has No 'Geolocation Data' to Back Up Bernie Moreno Smear.  A spokeswoman for the Associated Press (AP) admitted to Breitbart News on Saturday that the organization does not, despite previously reporting in two different pieces that it did, have any "geolocation data" to back up its smear piece about Ohio Senate candidate Bernie Moreno.  Lauren Easton, the director of communications for the AP, on Saturday told Breitbart News that while the organization stands by the story and its reporter Brian Slodysko, it does not have "geolocation data" as the two articles it previously published originally claimed.

US in deep freeze while much of the world is extra toasty?  Yet again, it's climate change.  [Scroll down]  Wind chills in parts of North Dakota reached minus 70 degrees (minus 56 degrees Celsius), while the heat index in Miami was more than 160 degrees warmer at 92 (33 degrees Celsius).  The fourth-coldest NFL football game took place in Kansas City, while across the globe the thermometer hit a blistering 92 degrees, 12 degrees (6.8 degrees Celsius) warmer than average on Friday during tennis' Australian Open in Melbourne.

The Editor says...
The article above is replete with half-truths and false comparisons.  The wind chill and the heat index are relatively recent inventions to estimate what the winter wind and the summer humidity make the weather feel like.  Comparing the wind chill at one place to the heat index in another (on the same day) is absurd and immaterial.  It proves nothing.  Also it is nothing but sensationalism to compare the temperature in Kansas City to the temperature in Melbourne, Australia, because in January, one city is in the middle of winter and the other is in the middle of summer.  The Associated Press hopes you won't notice.

Strange Joe Biden Moment in Pennsylvania Coffee Shop Goes Viral.  Democrat President Joe Biden, who is 81 years old, had yet another strange moment on the campaign trail in Emmaus, Pennsylvania, on Friday, one that went viral with multiple different interpretations of what he said taking over the internet.  The Republican National Committee (RNC) originally posted a video of Biden sounding like he said to a coffee shop clerk:  "My name is Joe Biden, and I work for the government in the Senate."  But the Associated Press's report on the moment says that Biden said: "My name is Joe Biden, and I work for the governor and the senator."  Biden was appearing alongside Pennyslvania's Democrat Gov. Josh Shapiro and Sen. Bob Casey (D-PA) at Nowhere Coffee Co.

US moves to protect wolverines as climate change melts their mountain refuges, threatens extinction.  The North American wolverine will receive long-delayed threatened species protections under a Biden administration proposal released Wednesday in response to scientists' warnings that climate change will likely melt away the rare species' snowy mountain refuges and push them toward extinction. [...] Wolverines join a growing number of animals, plants and insects — from polar bears in Alaska to crocodiles in southern Florida — that officials say are at growing risk as increasing temperatures bake the planet, altering snowfall patterns and raising sea levels.

The Editor says...
The Associated Press is getting more brazen in its reporting of the dire effects of global warming, even though there has been approximately zero global warming in the last 25 years.  Certainly not enough of a change for a wolverine to sense.  In particular, the Associated Press casually presents idle conjecture as proven fact.  The AP doesn't hesitate to report changes "snowfall patterns and raising sea levels" as if those are well-established facts on which we all agree.

Right turn on red?  With pedestrian deaths rising, US cities are considering bans.  Sophee Langerman was on her way to a bicycle safety rally in Chicago's Lakeview neighborhood in June when a car turning right rolled through a red light and slammed into her bike, which she was walking off the curb and into the crosswalk.  The car was moving slowly enough that Langerman escaped serious injury, but the bicycle required extensive repairs.  To Langerman, it's another argument for ending a practice that almost all U.S. cities have embraced for decades: the legal prerogative for a driver to turn right after stopping at a red light.

The Editor says...
[#1] The car that hit Ms. Langerman "rolled through a red light."  The laws in question permit drivers "to turn right after stopping at a red light."  Most people don't actually stop.  That's the problem.  [#2] The right-turn-on-red laws are in place because a majority of the voters wanted them.  The Associated Press is apparently lobbying for the repeal of these laws, based on dishonest reporting of isolated anecdotes.  Why would they do that?  Because socialists want driving an automobile to be as inconvenient as possible, regardless of the voters.

Tens of thousands march to kick off climate summit, demanding end to warming-causing fossil fuels.  Yelling that the future and their lives depend on ending fossil fuels, tens of thousands of protesters on Sunday kicked off a week where leaders will try once again to curb climate change primarily caused by coal, oil and natural gas.  But protesters say it's not going to be enough.  And they aimed their wrath directly at U.S. President Joe Biden, urging him to stop approving new oil and gas projects, phase out current ones and declare a climate emergency with larger executive powers.

The Editor says...
Climate change is not "primarily caused by coal, oil and natural gas."  That assertion was thrown in by the Associated Press writer as if it were an undisputed fact.  The climate was constantly changing long before the industrial revolution created a demand for hydrocarbon fuels, among other things.  The output power of the Sun is not constant.  The eruption of one volcano can alter the weather for months.  China and India have no qualms about the emission of carbon dioxide, so any attempt to reduce our own CO2 byproducts will only hurt US.

Media Hoax: No, the Diary of Anne Frank Has Not Been Banned From Florida Schools.  Not a week goes by that the mainstream media and their allies in the Democratic party don't work hand in hand to misinform the public in an effort to push false narratives about their political opposition.  This week has certainly been no exception to that rule, with the Associated Press among the numerous media outlets that have distorted a Florida high school's decision to remove from their library a book that was very loosely based on the Diary of Anne Frank on the grounds that it minimized the Holocaust and depicted Frank as a young lesbian girl who fantasized about seeing women's breasts.  Katie Couric was among the many so-called "journalists" who shared the story:  [Tweet]  Note that the AP made no attempt to provide even the briefest of contexts in the headline, a dereliction of duty in my opinion since headlines (and the tweets that include them) are oftentimes all people will read about a story before forming an opinion.  At first glance, it makes it look like the grades 9-12 Florida school in question didn't want their students learning about the Holocaust and Frank's experiences, so they pulled the book.  Except that's not the situation at all.

The Media Keep Lying To Protect Ilhan Omar.  After the House voted to deny Rep. Ilhan Omar a seat on the Foreign Affairs Committee — using a precedent Democrats recently created but suddenly find deeply offensive — AP tweeted: "BREAKING: House Republicans have voted to oust Democratic Rep Ihan [sic] Omar from the House Foreign Affairs committee.  The vote to remove the Somali-born Muslim lawmaker came after her past comments critical of Israel."  Almost two years ago to the day, the Associated Press reported on the House removing another congresswoman, Marjorie Taylor Greene, from her committee assignments like so:  "BREAKING: The U.S. House votes to remove Marjorie Taylor Greene from committees for spreading violent, racist rhetoric."  You'll notice that when Democrats denied Taylor Greene a committee seat it was "the House," but it is "House Republicans" when Omar is booted (and this was the case on NPR, PBS, Yahoo!, etc.).  House Speaker Kevin McCarthy has the power to unilaterally eject Reps.  Adam Schiff and Eric Swalwell from the intelligence committee, but the entire House was needed to remove Omar.  Obviously both votes were largely along partisan lines, as almost all votes are these days.  It's a newsworthy fact, no doubt.  Yet AP editors left the partisan aspect of the story out of the headline for only one of the incidents, even though Democrats were the ones creating the precedent.

The Associated Press Says It's 'Dehumanizing' to Use 'the' in Descriptions — Such as 'the French'.  Are you among the group of Americans who use the word "the"?  Are you part of the people who employ it in the act of description?  If so, you've been told to stop — by The AP.  The Associated Press Stylebook has long been considered an authority on ways in which to format the printed word.  Many media outlets conform to its standards, and the latest one is quite a stunner.

Liberal media made slew of dubious claims about climate change, year-end report finds.  The Associated Press took $8 million in donations to fund climate coverage in 2022, with the news cooperative and several other major media publications engaged in dubious claims about climate change, according to a new, exclusive year-end report.  The "Climate Fact Check 2022" report, presented by the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI), the Heartland Institute, the Energy & Environmental Legal Institute, the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT), and the International Climate Science Coalition (ICSC), stated that "climate alarmists" and members of the media engaged in claims about the relationship between manmade emissions and natural disasters, claims that clashed with "reality and science."  In February, the Associated Press admitted that they would assign more than 24 journalists across the globe to cover "climate issues" after receiving more than $8 million over three years from various organizations.

Revisionist Media 'Explainer' Articles Insist Nobody 'Spied' on Trump.  There's a second wave of media reaction to John Durham's latest filing on the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation.  The first wave was silence, hoping somehow the whole story would vanish.  Now, the second wave is "Explainers," which attempt to hem and haw defensively through the whole business.  The Associated Press "Explainer" was headlined "How the latest Trump-Russia filing generated buzz."  This article was sent to me on Twitter by a fellow who apparently hates Donald Trump with the energy of a thousand suns, so that illustrates the type of people who eagerly share these dismissive articles.  The AP reporter on this was Eric Tucker. [...] This is the threat that Durham represents.  He is exposing that everything the Clinton campaign did here was to politicize national security agencies, sharing its smears with the FBI and the CIA to spur spying on Trump advisers, to inflame media coverage, and then to taint the judicial process through the Mueller team, where 11 of 16 prosecutors were Democrat donors.  Five of them were Clinton donors.

Don't believe what Canadian media tells you about the Freedom Convoy.  Hundreds of thousands of citizens gathered across Canada last week to support the Freedom Convoy that trucked across the country to Ottawa to non-violently protest what have become, for some, the most oppressive and fickle health regulations in the world.  Our Prime Minister denounced them all yesterday as swastika-carrying inciters of violence who promote "hate rhetoric" and are "abusive towards their fellow citizens." [...] The Associated Press in Toronto outright lied, claiming there was "little sympathy in a country where more than 80% are vaccinated."  Most in the crowds were probably vaccinated.  "Three shots & I still can't get a haircut," one man's homemade sign said.  This was about freedom.  And a people sick of moving goalposts.  "Many people were outraged by some of the crude behavior," the AP lied.  But there was no crude behaviour.  It was lying.  Our Prime Minister did this too.

Associated Press = Associated Propaganda.  If nothing else, the past two years have demonstrated with blazing clarity how the ruling elites live by one set of rules and impose an entirely separate set of rules on the unfavored, ostracized, dispossessed and deplatformed.  As a member of the print, broadcast and internet media for the past 30 years, I cannot emphasize enough how complicit so-called mainstream journalists are in perpetuating such double standards and stoking hatred of dissidents.  The Fourth Estate will spare no one — not even the dead — in its ruthless pursuit of absolute power over political narratives.  Let us consider a widely disseminated hit piece by Associated Press investigative reporter Michael Biesecker published on Jan. 3.

[The] Associated Press [is] lying about consensus on COVID vaccines for children.  On 15 December the Associated Press (AP), one of the world's premier wire services, ran a lengthy report titled "How a Kennedy Built an Anti-Vaccine Juggernaut Amidst Covid-19."  The report, written by Michelle Smith, examined the efforts of Robert Kennedy, Jr. to warn against what he perceives are the risks associated with the current Covid vaccines, and particularly how those risks pertain to children. [...] Anybody who takes the trouble to do even a little research will quickly find out that no such consensus exists.  This is very easy to show.  To wit, less than a week before the Associated Press filed its report an international conference was held.  It was co-sponsored by an organization called Global Covid Summit, which is an international alliance of physicians and medical scientists "committed to speaking truth about Covid pandemic research and treatment."  This organization has more than fifteen thousand members from around the globe, many of whom are recognized as top experts in their fields.

Our Media Apparently Decides Who Won the NJ Gubernatorial Election.  Apparently, our corrupt media now calls elections and decides who wins.  The Associated Press called the race for New Jersey Governor.  Unsurprisingly, they called it for totalitarian progressive Phil Murphy.  They called it while an investigation is going on and 40,000 votes, giving Murphy the edge, miraculously appeared in Bergen County.  This was after 100% of the vote was reported in.  There is no way Red districts went for Murphy in this climate.  Yet, that appears to be what we are supposed to believe.  Murphy is 20,000 votes ahead of Republican opponent Jack Ciatarelli.  Why is the media calling races and why are they doing it before the investigation is completed?

'Miss Occupy Cockpit in trouble now': Southwest 'Let's Go Brandon' pilot narrative takes odd twist in audio doubletake.  Southwest Airlines 'Let's go, Brandon!' claim may not be all it's cracked up to be according to social media sleuths[.]  Associated Press reporter Colleen Long claimed over the weekend that a Southwest Airlines pilot on her flight signed off with "Let's go, Brandon!" but the audio being passed around with her story seems to have some major inconsistencies.  First off, according to Twitchy, there is real doubt as to whether the pilot said "Let's go, Brandon!" or "Let's go, Braves!" because the audio is clipped.  But the media ran with the much more controversial "Let's go, Brandon!" pretty much on the word of an AP reporter.

Is the story about the Southwest pilot saying 'Let's Go, Brandon' all wrong?  It was a made-to-go viral story: a Southwest pilot, after making his little announcement about the flight to passengers, closed by saying, "Let's go, Brandon."  The next day, an AP reporter tweeted out that she tried desperately — and unsuccessfully — to get to the cockpit to interview the pilot about what he said for her story about "Let's go, Brandon."  The response was instant, with leftists demanding that he get fired and one likening him to an ISIS-supporter.  But what if the whole narrative is wrong?  It's beginning to look as though that's the case.  If you listen to the pilot, when he mumbles "Let's go..." at the end, it doesn't really sound like "Brandon."  It's more likely that the pilot said, "Let's go, Braves."  [Video clip]

Another DeSantis 'Scandal' Implodes.  Did you year about the latest "evidence" reported by the "news" media that Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis is both terrible on COVID and corrupt?  The Associated Press published a story yesterday that quickly gained traction among the "Ron Deathsentence" crowd — primarily comprised of bored resistance warriors and nervous leftists seeking to kill his political career (many journalists fall into both categories, of course). [...] Beyond the headline, which seems specifically engineered to generate shares, go viral, and create the appearance of an ethical and COVID-related cloud over DeSantis (we've seen this play before), the "story" falls apart.  There's nothing newsworthy here, aside from the governor of a large state in the midst of a nasty seasonal COVID spike proactively providing life-saving treatments to eligible residents.

Allegedly overwhelmed hospital's parking lot is empty
Media Reports Florida Hospitals are 'Overrun' — Then One Person Actually Went to Hospital at the 'Center of Storm' to Check.  There is a tremendous amount of effort being expended in the mainstream media to hold up Florida as a complete failure when it comes to the COVID pandemic.  On Friday, the Associated Press reported that Florida broke the 'record' with more than 21,000 new cases in the state.  One of the key contentions was that hospitals were closed to being 'overrun,' a common claim in COVID reports that have nearly all turned up hollow.  "The Florida Hospital Association said Friday that statewide COVID-19 hospitalizations are nearing last year's peak, and one of the state's largest health care systems, AdventHealth's Central Florida Division, this week advised it would no longer be conducting nonemergency surgeries in order to free up resources for COVID-19 patients," the AP reported. [...] One citizen decided not to take the Associated Press or any other mainstream media outlet's word for it and decided to check it out for themself.  Dr. Shay, Phd., who goes by AMA Black Patriot on Twitter (@DrShayPhD) went to a hospital at Cape Canaveral, Florida, which the AP had used as the location for one of its report.  "So the Associated Press wrote an article saying that Cape Canaveral, FL hospital is bursting at the seams with Covid patients," Dr. Shay tweeted.  "I had to go see for myself, so I drove there.  The first set of pictures are of the hospital's parking.  More to follow."


The decline and fall of the Associated Press.  Once, long ago, in a land far away, the best journalists tried to stand aloof from the stories they reported.  The idea was simple and powerful.  If journalists tried to be neutral and kept their reporting separate from their opinions, analysis, and speculation, then the public would believe them.  Those days are long gone — and the media's credibility is gone with them.  Journalists and media organizations are now smack in the middle of many stories they cover, in part because they want to be.  They want to spin them, to set 'the Narrative'.  Imbued with this new mission, many journalists have become partisan protagonists.  They have deliberately blurred the lines between facts, analysis and opinion — and downplayed the traditional role of presenting the facts neutrally and letting readers decide.  That's a dramatic change in journalistic norms and a disturbing one for both the media and the public.

Israel exploded AP's offices; Hamas exploded AP's reputation.  This weekend's literally explosive revelation that the Associated Press served as a human shield for Hamas has repercussions.  In an editorial today [5/18/2021], the New York Post called into question years of AP's coverage of the Hamas terror group's attacks on the sovereign state of Israel.  This comes after Israel told AP to evacuate its offices in a Hamas-owned building because it was going to blow the building up because it housed Hamas's spy operations.  AP howled and cried unfair.  The rest of us said, huh?  Hamas was AP's landlord?  How [...] is that ethical?  Imagine AP renting from Al Qaida or ISIS.  Maybe it did.  The New York Post asked, "If AP really didn't know it shared space with Hamas, why trust its reporting?"  Good question.

How the AP Slanted Border Coverage to Hide the Crisis.  Typically, news organizations rush to cover crises, real or perceived.  The Associated Press has taken a different tack, using its influential style guide to play down the human drama unfolding at the southern border.  While internal Customs and Border Protection documents repeatedly refer to an immigration "surge" at the border, according to records reviewed by the Washington Free Beacon, the AP recommends journalists no longer use such descriptions to avoid offense and maintain supposed "neutrality." Other documents, circulated internally throughout Customs and Border Protection in May, instruct officials on processing "the surge of undocumented individuals as efficiently as possible."  The move by AP, a response to left-wing activists who demanded gentler language from reporters when covering immigration, fundamentally changed how newsrooms across the country covered the Biden administration's response to a historical influx of migrants in the president's first 100 days in office.

Ri-i-i-ght.
AP Denies Any Knowledge Gaza Office Building Was Shared with Hamas Terrorists.  The Associated Press (AP) denied any knowledge that Jala Tower, the building housing its offices in Gaza, was also shared by Hamas terrorists, as claimed by the Israeli military and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu after the office block was bombed on Saturday [5/15/2021].  AP President and CEO Gary Pruitt denied that the news organization knew Hamas was in the building.

The Editor says...
To put this as politely as I can, I find it impossible to believe that the people working in a professional news-gathering organization, in a volatile part of the world, would have been oblivious to terrorists in their office building.  That level of cluelessness is almost incomprehensible.  I'm not the only one who's skeptical.

AP Pretends It Didn't Know It Was Sharing a Building With Hamas.  After an airstrike struck a building with terrorist tenants that included Hamas and Al Jazeera, controlled by Qatar, a backer of Hamas, the main story in the media was about... the media.  Specifically the AP's presence in the same building.  "We are shocked and horrified that the Israeli military would target and destroy the building housing AP's bureau and other news organizations in Gaza.  They have long known the location of our bureau and knew journalists were there.  We received a warning that the building would be hit," the AP's statement says.  And the AP is complaining about what?  Israel warned it that the building was a target.  AP chose to share a building with Hamas and pretend not to know about it.

Confirmed: the AP Is Incredibly Ignorant and Yes, Hamas Was in the Building.  We reported yesterday how the AP was furious that Israel had leveled the building in which they had offices in Gaza because they were sharing it was Hamas.  We asked the basic question: how could they not know they were sharing the building with Hamas?  The AP issued a statement saying they'd been in the building for 15 years — and had no indication that Hamas was in the building.

If AP really didn't know it shared space with Hamas, why trust its reporting?  After an Israeli airstrike Saturday destroyed a high-rise office tower on the Gaza Strip, the Associated Press, which had offices there for 15 years, complained, claiming it had no idea the building was also home to Hamas.  If it's true that AP was so unaware — and the evidence suggests it's unlikely — how can anyone trust its reporting in the region?  The Israeli military ordered the 12-story al-Jalaa Tower, which hosts AP and Al Jazeera offices, evacuated an hour before the strike, saying it was being used by Hamas military intelligence.  For a week, tensions between Israel and Hamas, the terrorist group that controls Gaza, have been at their highest since their 2014 conflict, with Hamas raining thousands of rockets into residential areas of the Jewish state.  Israel later shared some intelligence with the United States.  "We showed them the smoking gun proving Hamas worked out of that building," a source close to Foreign Minister Gabi Ashkenazi told the Jerusalem Post.  "I understand they found the explanation satisfactory."

Associated Press is slammed for saying it was unaware of Hamas intel operation in their building.  The Associated Press has been accused of lying about whether it knew Hamas maintained a military presence in its Gaza headquarters.  Israeli forces destroyed Jala Tower which had been the AP's headquarters in the Palestinian territory for 15 years, and was also where Al Jazeera was based.  Politicians and journalists in the United States rushed to condemn the bombing, claiming the Israelis had endangered the lives of the journalists.

Israel showed US 'smoking gun' on Hamas in AP office tower, officials say.  Israel shared intelligence with the US showing how Hamas operated inside the same building with the Associated Press and Al-Jazeera in Gaza, officials in Jerusalem said on Sunday.  Officials in more than one government office confirmed that US President Joe Biden's phone call to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Saturday was, in part, about the bombing of the building, and that Israel showed Biden and American officials the intelligence behind the action.  "We showed them the smoking gun proving Hamas worked out of that building," a senior diplomatic source said.  "I understand they found the explanation satisfactory."

The AP goes Sgt. Schultz.  After its customary warning to protect civilian life, the IDF took out the 12-story Jala Tower housing Hamas military intelligence offices as well as offices for Al Jazeera and the Associated Press.  As far as I can tell from reports such as this photo-filled story in the Daily Mail, no lives were lost in the bombing.  The Biden administration nevertheless found the occasion fit to lecture Israel yesterday "that ensuring the safety and security of journalists and independent media is a paramount responsibility."  According to the Jerusalem Post, Israeli authorities have showed Biden administration officials the "smoking gun" proving that Hamas worked out of the building.

Neither the Media Nor the Electoral College Calls Races — the GSA Does & They've Been Silent.  In a Nov. 2 piece recounting the longstanding role of The Associated Press in determining winners of presidential elections, New York Times reporter Katie Robertson wrote "In the United States — which, unlike many other countries, does not have a national electoral commission — the news media takes the role of race-caller in presidential elections."  According to who?  Robertson conveniently left out that it's not the self-anointed media experts who call elections, but rather the General Services Administration, which issues a letter of determination in a race.  So far, the GSA hasn't done that, regardless of what the media "race-callers" dictate.  Interestingly, Robertson's article included commentary from Sally Buzbee, executive editor for The Associated Press, who actually explained in clear detail why it's premature and disingenuous for anyone in the media to declare Joe Biden the victor right now.

The TV networks can make all the declarations and pronouncements they like, but they are not official.
Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, AP Call Presidential Election for Joe Biden.  Corporate media outlets called the presidential election for former Vice President Joe Biden and his running mate, Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA).  CNN, MSNBC, and the Associated Press called the election for Biden at 11:28 a.m., just minutes before President Trump's lawyers were expected to speak at a press conference about challenging votes in Pennsylvania.  Fox News ultimately followed suit at 11:40 a.m.

The Editor says...
Television stations and networks operate on the age-old principle of "monkey see, monkey do."  If two or more competitors simultaneously declare that the moon is 53 percent uranium, the others will soon follow suit, attributing the story to the competition if necessary.  But they don't want to be the last ones to report that they know about a "breaking" story, even if it's questionable.

AP called out for adopting Democrat language on court-packing.  The Associated Press was forced to add an editor's note to a recent story about the Supreme Court on Saturday, in which the outlet made it seem as if the Democratic strategy to pack the high court would "depoliticize" the bench.  The article, written by Iris Samuels, centered on a debate between Sen. Steve Daines, R-Mont., and Gov. Steve Bullock, his Democratic opponent in the upcoming election.  The AP's original post reportedly read, "Bullock said that if Coney Barrett was confirmed, he would be open to measures to depoliticize the court, including adding judges to the bench, a practice critics have dubbed packing the courts."  The report referred to President Trump's Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett.

'Americans aren't idiots!' The AP's use of 'Democrats' language' to explain 'packing the court' doesn't go well.  Since the Associated Press considers itself "an independent global news organization dedicated to factual reporting," it would be problematic for an AP article to contain commentary packaged as news and facts.  Real Clear Politics co-founder and president Tom Bevan captured the following excerpt from an AP story.  ["]With lightning speed, the Associated Press adopts Democrats' language on SCOTUS: adding members is now 'depoliticizing' the court, only 'critics' refer to it as 'packing.'["] [...] To call increasing the number of Supreme Court justices "depoliticizing" would be an egregious political overstatement if made by a Democrat politician, much less a news organization.

Associated Press stylebook revisions sugarcoat rioting and looting.  The stylebook published by the Associated Press was virtually the bible for journalistic writing until the past several years, an authoritative guide as to which terms to use and which to avoid in order to present the news fairly, without biasing readers one way or another.  But that memory is fading fast now that the capture of journalism by the left is a fait accompli.  Instead of eliminating bias, the AP Stylebook is being revised along the lines George Orwell laid out in 1984 — as a tool for indoctrination.

AP Issues New Guidance for Reporters to Cover Up Leftist Violence.  Mobs of violent left-wing kooks have been roaming the streets of American cities for months terrorizing residents, murdering Trump supporters, beating people to a pulp, shooting police officers, and assaulting people in their vehicles.  But you wouldn't know any of this if you consumed news exclusively from the mainstream media because the mainstream media doesn't want you to know about it.  The Associated Press (AP) issues guidelines, closely adhered to by many journalists, dictating what words are politically correct at the time and what words to avoid.  The AP issued new guidance on Wednesday telling journalists to avoid using the word "riot" when covering leftwing events and refrain from reporting on property destruction because, according to the AP, such reporting has been used in the past as a way to stigmatize protests against lynching and racial injustice.  To the AP, it's not the job of journalists to report the news.  It's the job of journalists to advance a left-wing narrative.

The lying about Donald Trump is now completely out of control.  Anti-trump liberals (i.e., Democrats and the media) just have to find something — anything — wrong with the president, even if it means making it up.  The perpetually not-President Hillary Clinton on Monday shared a side-by-side photo of the White House, one lit up in a rainbow spectrum from 2015, when Barack Obama was in office, and the other appearing almost in pitch black with no lighting.  "Elections matter," tweeted Clinton. [...] Yet it turns out the photo passed off as a metaphor for Trump's apathy toward police brutality and racism was actually, like the rainbow White House, from the Obama years.  So pervasive was that meme on social media that the Associated Press was moved to fact check and let liberals know that, sorry, the slam dunk on Trump was actually an embarrassing rebound.

Obama's De Facto Russian Collusion Co-Conspirators.  [Scroll down]  In a little over three years, the Washington Post published nearly 24,000 stories about Trump, Russia and collusion.  The New York Times published over 18,000 stories.  CNN on its website published 11,500 stories.  The wire service Associated Press, which supplies over 1300 local newspapers and broadcasters with news articles, published nearly 12,500 stories.  All told there were probably more than 100,000 stories published in the media, over 90% of which were anti-Trump with virtually no criticism or disclosure of the Obama Administration and their machinations.  Among CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, PBS and NBC, it is estimated that over 20,000 broadcast hours were spent on the Russian collusion narrative again virtually all anti-Trump as many of the Obama collaborators were retained as contributors on these networks.  Barack Obama's faith in the cooperation of the mainstream media was also well placed.

Steve Wynn Vindicated.  [Scroll down]  This isn't the first time, of course, that the Associated Press and the New York Times have peddled "totally fanciful" stories that served their agendas, and it won't be the last.  Wynn sued the AP as well as Kuta, but the judge found in AP's favor because its story relied on a police report.

Media victim-blames Jews for anti-Semitic attacks.  Anti-Semitic attacks are increasing at an alarming rate in the New York area, and NBC New York seems to think Hasidic and Orthodox Jews have somehow created this problem by... living there.  In a now-deleted tweet, the media outlet shared a story and claimed "the expansion of Orthodox communities outside NYC" has resulted in "civic sparring," and "some fear the recent violence may be an outgrowth of that conflict."  NBC New York deleted the tweet shortly after, but the story, originally reported and written by the Associated Press, itself isn't much better.  In fact, it might be worse.

AP Retracts False Claim Trump Contradicted Ambassador's Testimony.  The Associated Press retracted a false claim that President Donald Trump "contradicted" the testimony of Ambassador Gordon Sondland in congressional testimony yesterday [11/20/2019] when he said he wanted "nothing" from Ukraine.  In a now-deleted tweet, the Associated Press' false claim blatantly ignores what Sondland actually testified that Trump said.

The What They Actually Said Rule.  The Associated Press today engaged in a clickbait that predates the Internet.  In it, the reporter makes a statement in the form of a question, then attributes the statement to the interviewed person.

Media Outlets Hype Trump Tweet As New Admission — Forget He Said The Same Thing Last Year.  Media outlets botched another Trump-Russia story on Sunday [8/5/2018].  President Donald Trump sent out a tweet Sunday morning defending his son Donald Trump Jr.'s decision to take a July 2016 meeting with a Russian lawyer who promised damaging information on then-Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. [...] The vast majority of reporting on the president's tweet portrayed it as a significant admission.  The Associated Press reported that Trump "appeared to change his story" and sent out a news alert to that effect.

Do Fake News and Corruption Change How We Think?  The release this week of the redacted Carter Page FISA warrant has generated metric tons of fake news and confirmed just how corrupt our institutions are. [...] At this point, the press has all but dropped any pretense of objectivity and is peddling outright (and obvious) lies.  John Hinderaker at PowerLine described the reporting as "a vendetta", but I am not sure he went far enough by simply calling out the Associated Press.  It was not only the that AP ran a fake news story but the Washington Post, CNN, MSNBC, New York Magazine, the New York Times, and even the Weekly Standard published stories suggesting the warrant as released contradicts Rep. Devin Nunes's blistering memo from earlier this year.

The Associated Press Lies About The FISA Application.  The Associated Press carries on a daily vendetta against the Trump administration, systematically misleading the American people in articles that appear in hundreds or thousands of newspapers.  Thus, it is no surprise that the AP's story on DOJ's FISA application dump is nothing but Democratic Party spin.

Not Real News:  A look at what didn't happen this week.  A roundup of some of the most popular, but completely untrue, headlines of the week.  None of these stories are legit, even though they were shared widely on social media.  The Associated Press checked these out; here are the real facts: [...]

NBC News Incorrectly Labels Menendez a Republican Before Correcting Article Hours Later.  NBC News published an article Wednesday incorrectly labeling Sen. Robert Menendez (D., N.J.), currently in federal court on bribery charges, a Republican.  NBC styled Menendez as a Republican in the lede of the article, then confusingly labeled him a Democrat at the end of the introductory paragraph, the Daily Caller reported.  The article appears to be a wire from the Associated Press, but the original piece on the AP's website does not feature the mistake, suggesting it was added in by NBC.

Democracy Dies Due To Journalists' Lies.  One of CNN's reporters complained that the president had the audacity to take questions in Poland from a reporter who had applied for a job with the Trump Administration.  Please pay no attention to the actual number of reporters who went to work for Barack Obama and those who did not but chose to carry his water for him.  After the election, the media pushed out the story that Russia had stolen the election for President Trump.  One newspaper claimed Russia had hacked the American power grid.  That story had to be retracted. [...] In February, the Associated Press ran a story that President Trump intended to mobilize the National Guard to round up illegal aliens.  The story was not true, but just about every major media outlet ran with it.  In May, the media claimed the GOP had trucked in beer to congress to celebrate repealing Obamacare.  That was not true either.

Associated Press Corrects Big Falsehood In Four Trump-Russia Reports.  The Associated Press "clarified" a false claim it's been running in stories about President Trump and Russia on Friday, conceding in a release it's not the case that 17 intelligence agencies "agreed" on the hacking narrative.  The correction to four reports on Trump and Russia comes the same day The New York Times issued a similar correction to a Maggie Haberman report.  Both TheNYT and the AP now say the claim they've been floating for months is incorrect.

How to Read the Newspaper.  The Associated Press has bias problems and some notable competency problems, and, like any organization that does any substantive reporting, it makes errors.  But it does not, for the most part, traffic in fiction. [...] Television has a somewhat worse record.  Dan Rather infamously attempted to derail the presidential campaign of George W. Bush by publishing a report, derived from fake documents, that Bush had been deficient in his military service, and that his superior officers had been pressured to cover up his shortcomings.  This was the event that really launched modern blogging as we know it, as dozens of critics ranging from politicos to typography experts showed that Rather's reporting was based on a fabrication, despite CBS News's strident defense of his work.  But it was not the first episode of its kind:  Dateline NBC had previously used incendiary devices to rig a Chevrolet truck to explode in a story purporting to demonstrate its unsafe gas-tank design.  There have been others.

The AP Attacks Voter ID.  The Associated Press is generally a mouthpiece for Democratic Party talking points.  That is the case as to voter ID, as this rather pathetic piece shows:  "In Wisconsin, ID law proved insurmountable for many voters." [...] The obvious question is:  how many?  The reporter now tells us that the number of people who didn't vote because they lacked proper ID is "unknown."  The article identifies exactly four.

Words matter:  The media's use of 'anti-abortion' to describe the March for Life is willful deception.  The outlets that decided to cover the march [1/27/2017] at all used phrases like "anti-abortion" and "abortion opponents" to advance the progressive pro-choice narrative that pro-life individuals are enemies of women's rights, and therefore human rights.

Liberal Media Bend Over Backwards To Avoid Describing March For Life As Pro-Life.  Liberal media outlets bent over backwards to avoid describing the March for Life as pro-life, relying exhaustively on terms like "anti-abortion" or "abortion opponents" to describe the hundreds of thousands of pro-life marchers in Washington, D.C. on Friday [1/27/2017].  "Anti-Abortion Groups Hold Triumphant Rally After Obama Years" was how the Associated Press titled its coverage of the march, later referring to the pro-life marchers as a "politically ascendant anti-abortion movement."

US carbon pollution from power plants hits 27-year low.  Carbon dioxide — from the burning of coal, oil and gas — is the chief greenhouse gas responsible for man-made global warming.

Bias alert:
The Associated Press is wrong about one aspect of this story, in the first sentence:  The primary greenhouse gas is water vapor, which no law or politician can counteract.

AP Calls Crippled Economy 'Healthy' Amid Mass Immigration.  In a grim report detailing America's severe economic decline, the Associated Press brushes off two crucial factors:  Mass immigration and Obamacare's grip on employers. [...] A record 93,626,000 Americans have stopped looking for work in an economy that managed to create only one job for every two immigrants the government let in from 2000 to 2014.  When all U.S. job growth goes to foreigners at the expense of Americans, while everyone in the labor force sees their wages suppressed year after year, it makes sense that some would throw in the towel — and other would tolerate less-than-ideal jobs to make ends meet.

AP perpetuates tale that Benghazi attack caused by anti-Islam film.  In a report about a Supreme Court ruling, the Associated Press on Monday [5/18/2015] continued with the ruse that an anti-Muslim film posted on YouTube caused violence in the Middle East, culminating in the murder of a U.S. ambassador on Sept. 11, 2012.  "In a victory for free speech advocates, a federal appeals court says YouTube should not have been forced to take down an anti-Muslim film that sparked violence in the Middle East and death threats to actors," the AP wrote.

AP Gives False and Conflicting Information on Potential Voter Fraud Case.  In a move that serves to discount the severity of voter fraud in the US, the Associated Press' Gary Fineout posted two conflicting reports regarding a voter fraud investigation.  Strangely, after posting inaccurate information in an article, the heavily left-leaning AP staff writer then posted an update — one that conflicted with the first false posting, yet was still false in itself.

Washington Post Admits to Bogus Quote.  Veteran Washington Post reporter Daryl Fears, part of a two-person writer team, unmistakably wrote that filmmaker John O'Keefe had "said" he "targeted" ACORN, the advocacy group, for his candid-camera expose, because it registered voters to defeat Republicans.  O'Keefe said no such thing.  It was a non-quote made out of whole cloth by reporter Fears, and published as fact on Sept. 17.  Making the falsehood exponentially worse, the Post story then was retailed worldwide by the Associated Press.

Investigation of COVID-19 cover-up in New York nursing homes is bad news for CNN.  An Associated Press investigation showing that more than 11,000 people may have died as a result of New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo's order forcing infectious coronavirus patients into long-term care facilities is obviously bad news for the state's chief executive.  It is also bad news for CNN, which has done more than any other news outlet to reframe Cuomo's disastrous handling of the pandemic as a success story.  "New York's coronavirus death toll in nursing homes, already among the highest in the nation, could actually be a significant undercount.  Unlike every other state with major outbreaks, New York only counts residents who died on nursing home property and not those who were transported to hospitals and died there," the AP reports.

Associated Press Engulfed in CNN-Level Scandal as It Covers Up Invention of Imaginary Pruitt Meeting.  A Breitbart News investigation has led to the correction by the Associated Press — which originally resisted — of the fake news it printed as deeper questions of responsibility, accountability, and journalistic ethics consume the AP heading into Fourth of July weekend.  This time, the Associated Press invented an imaginary meeting between EPA administrator Scott Pruitt and Dow Chemical CEO Andrew Liveris, and then alleged that some kind of impropriety happened as a result.

Police Conclusion: Rolling Stone UVA Rape Story a Work of Fiction.  Four months after the publication of an infamous Rolling Stone piece depicting a violent gang rape at one of the University of Virginia's fraternities, and the magazine's subsequent retraction due to numerous inconsistencies and gross journalistic malpractice, the Charlottesville police department announced their investigation's findings this afternoon [3/23/2015].  From the Associated Press:  ["']All I can tell you is that there is no substantive basis to conclude that what was reported in that article happened,['] Charlottesville Police Chief Timothy Longo said.["]

The Price Of A Porcine Panic.  There's panic in the streets over a flu outbreak.  "Projections are that this virus will kill 1 million Americans," the nation's top health official has warned.  The virus is swine flu.  But the date is 1976.  And the projection, it turns out, is off by 999,999 deaths.  Direct ones, that is.  The hastily developed vaccine killed or crippled hundreds.

An example of Associated Press hysteria:
Figuring How to Terrify Us Over Swine Flu.  "U.S. health officials say swine flu could strike up to 40 percent of Americans over the next two years and as many as several hundred thousand could die."  So declares an Associated Press article, the writer of which you can picture trying to catch his breath as he pounds away at the keyboard.


Newsweek

Newsweek descends deeper into the gutter of vile propaganda.  [Scroll down]  Following orders from the PR wing, is the formerly respectable news outlet Newsweek.  An article in the magazine quotes FBI Director Christopher Wray's testimony before the House Judiciary Committee where he said it is not yet certain if Trump's injury was caused by a bullet or shrapnel.  How did the Newsweek article cover this?  Their tweet promoting the article is captioned 'Donald Trump might not have been shot after all.'  Their article headline states 'Donald Trump May Not Have Been Hit By Bullet, FBI Director Says'  They are hoping that people don't read the article and make up their minds just by reading the text of the tweet or the headline.  They are wishing that people would assume that the shooting was a hoax or even staged by Trump so that it would benefit him politically.  Many left-wing conspiracy theorists had claimed this moments after the incident.  It must be understood that this isn't a mistake.  An article goes through multiple reviews from editors before it is published, even if the writer erred, someone on the editorial team should have rectified the error.  The same applies to social media.  The fact that this disgraceful material was published proves it was purposeful[.]  This is a vile and disgraceful piece of propaganda.

No Matter How Much You Hate the Media, It Isn't Enough.  A sad incident occurred at the Home Depot in Fontana, California (fifty miles east of Los Angeles) on February 27. After running in and out of traffic, apparently trying to be hit, Marcus Allen Camacho ran into the store and grabbed a jab saw.  Camacho ignored police orders to drop the weapon, shook off a taser hit, and when he started running toward police while brandishing the saw, he was shot and killed by officers.  Camacho, who according to his widow suffered from mental health issues, left her and four children behind.  One would think that any reporting on this story aside from bare-boned facts would take time to pursue the mental health angle.  Did Camacho seek help for his problems?  If so, did he receive any?  Were there drugs involved?  His wife's statement on a GoFundMe page seeking donations to pay for funeral expenses makes no mention of any. [...] Responsible reporting — fundamentally sound reporting — would pursue answers to these questions.  Instead, we have one Khaleda Rahman of Newsweek chiming in with a take so egregiously agenda-driven it barely mentions the facts before diving into the deep end of woke.

Newsweek Lies About President Trump Not Being on Primary Ballot in Colorado and Maine.  Given the nature of the propaganda we are likely to see in the 2024 election, perhaps this should not come as a surprise.  However, in an article published today within Newsweek, there is a direct lie about President Trump and the GOP ballot for Colorado and Maine. [...] Newsweek claims that President Trump "will not appear on the primary ballot in Maine and Colorado," this is a lie.  Both states (court and secretary of state) "stayed" their political ruling and arbitrary decisions, which permits Donald Trump to continue appearing on both primary ballots.  In the bigger picture, this type of media claim is a result of accepting the insufferable terms of 'disinformation', 'misinformation' and 'malinformation' to permeate the world of information.  This claim by Newsweek is a lie — period.  It is not misinformation or shaped information; it is just plain false.

Newsweek reported Trump got booed at the Palmetto Bowl.  Come listen to the "boos" for yourself.  [Several video clips prove otherwise.]

Deep State Throat Sends a Warning.  "Donald Trump Followers Targeted by FBI as 2024 Election Nears" headlined the October 4 report in Newsweek.  "The federal government believes that the threat of violence and major civil disturbances around the 2024 U.S. presidential election is so great that it has quietly created a new category of extremists that it seeks to track and counter:  Donald Trump's army of MAGA followers."  Author William M. Arkin, an "award-winning journalist" and author of best-selling books, thus sets the tone right from the top.  Donald Trump has "followers," language readers might expect for a religious cult leader, and these followers constitute an "army."  The challenge for the FBI, Arkin explains, "is to pursue and prevent what it calls domestic terrorism without direct reference to political parties or affiliations — even though the vast majority of its current 'anti-government' investigations are of Trump supporters, according to classified data obtained by Newsweek."  That data is not the article's only source.

Newsweek Failed to Disclose [an] Anti-Trump Op-Ed [was] Written by DeSantis Pollsters.  Corporate media outlet Newsweek has been caught failing to disclose that an opinion editorial attacking former President Donald Trump was written by two employees of a polling firm whose founder and CEO is the chief pollster for the pro-DeSantis SuperPAC Never Back Down.  The authors, Byron Allen and Amanda Iovino, are both employees of WPA Intelligence, and used their op-ed column to claim Trump is losing white voters, passing off Never Back Down talking points as thin analysis.  Newsweek makes no mention of WPA Intelligence's affiliation with Never Back Down.

Fake News Newsweek Mocks Trump for Having 200 Tickets Left Unsold in Arena That Holds 21,000.  You really cannot trust a single thing the fake news mainstream media is reporting anymore.  On Saturday night [12/18/2021] President Trump held an event with Bill O'Reilly in Houston, Texas at the Tokyo Center.  The arena was packed to capacity.  But you wouldn't know this if you read fake news Newsweek.  The far-left publication actually mocked President Trump for the 200 tickets that were not sold before the event started this afternoon.

Media assault on Amy Coney Barrett begins as Trump weighs decision.  A media campaign has erupted against Amy Coney Barrett, even though President Trump hasn't actually nominated her to the Supreme Court.  Barrett is clearly the front-runner, having spent a second straight day at the White House as the president moves toward his Saturday [9/26/2020] announcement.  And of course there should be substantial scrutiny of her record if she's picked, given that replacing Ruth Bader Ginsburg is a lifetime appointment.  But there are early signs this is going to be ugly, and that her religion will be front and center.  That subject came up in 2017 when the Senate approved her as a federal appeals court judge in Chicago.  Newsweek jumped on the judge with a smear that turned out to be factually wrong.

The Attacks on Judge Barrett Have Already Started.  Some left-wingers aren't waiting for Judge Amy Barrett to be nominated to the Supreme Court to start attacking her.  The attacks over the last few days have been steeped in anti-Catholicism, other types of bigotry, and lazy error.  A headline at the left-wing website Refinery29 called her "the Potential RBG Replacement Who Hates Your Uterus."  (I'm guessing she didn't come to have seven children by hating anyone's uterus.)  Newsweek ran a story claiming that she is part of a Catholic group that inspired Margaret Atwood to write The Handmaid's Tale.  It then appended a correction at the bottom of the page noting that Atwood had referred to a different Catholic group.  Oops.  Then Refinery29 picked up the smear and ran with it.

Newsweek [is] Forced To Issue Major Retraction After It Smears Amy Coney Barrett, Claims.  Newsweek magazine has issued a major correction to an article smearing potential Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett, accusing the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals judge of belonging to a Catholic sect that "inspired" the novel "The Handmaid's Tale."  Initially, Newsweek claimed that "People of Praise," a charismatic Catholic group to which Barrett reportedly belongs, "served as inspiration for Margaret Atwood's dystopian novel, The Handmaid's Tale," adding that female members are forced to report to spiritual superiors known as "handmaids," and that the group stresses that "men have authority over their wives."

Amy Coney Barrett Is Living The Handmaid's Tale?  [Scroll down]  One former member described the group as an:  ["]abusive cult in which women are completely obedient to men and independent thinkers are humiliated, interrogated, shamed and shunned.["]  Indeed.  After all, Barrett's knuckle-dragging misogynistic religious fanatic husband has only let the poor woman out of the house twice.  Once, to serve a 15-year stint as a law professor at a highly prestigious university.  And again to slave away as a judge on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.

Newsweek Hits a New Low.  If decent people working in mainstream American media want to know why many Americans do not trust them and are willing to use the term "fake news" to describe the mainstream media, I offer one of the most glaring examples of a lie in my lifetime.  Last week, Newsweek headlined the following:  "Conservative Radio Host Ridicules Anne Frank: 'I Don't Get My Wisdom From Teenagers.'"  Now, imagine how that must have struck any reader not familiar with the "conservative radio host" or with what he actually said.  "Ridicule Anne Frank" — what kind of terrible human being would do that?  Well, it turns out the "conservative radio host" was me.  Yes, me — a religious Jew who has devoted much of his life to the welfare of the Jewish people, served on the board of the U.S. Holocaust Museum, made the most widely viewed pro-Israel video in the world, written a book on anti-Semitism that is in its third printing, and founded a synagogue and a Jewish day school.

The Fake Leading the Fake.  Are we watching what's left of Western civilization drive itself nuts?  Not just Trump, but a whole cast of strange Washington figures daily appear on TV, saying the most astonishing things.  Even the subject matter of public discourse has gone weird.  Shrillness and hysteria are the order of the day.  Every statement is shouted in capital letters.  Nor is there any harbor to be found in social media, only more paranoia — amplified by Russian trolls admired perhaps by fake rental followers from India.  There is even fake music.  The watchers have been contaminated.  Newsweek has been accused of falsifying their audience traffic.  It is now a case of the fake following the fake.

On Gorka, the crazy left declares war.  [Scroll down]  So we learn that Gorka's degree isn't good enough, as if that is the best criterion for judging whether someone is suitable for executing policy.  To support this, we learn he got into a scrap with an obnoxious little academic troll with a wounded bloated ego named Smith.  We read a real whopper of an unsubstantiated claim, from some little known associate professor, accusing Gorka of plagiarism in his doctoral thesis, with absolutely no substantiation — and substantiation would be very easy.  (The funniest part of these whinings in this pattern of argument is from an earlier article in Newsweek, which claims that since Gorka never submitted an article to some obscure academic journal called "Terrorism and Political Violence," he can't possibly be of any consequence.)  We see name-calling.  We see mangled facts and repackaged narratives.  Let's look at some of those.

Newsweek hit piece smears Bible, Christians.  Newsweek's 16-page diatribe portrays Evangelical Christians as homophobic, right-wing fundamentalist hypocrites who believe an unbelievable Bible.  And just in case the reader misses the writer's subtle nuance, the essay was illustrated with images of snake handlers, Pat Robertson and the Westboro Baptist Church.  That's because in the minds of Newsweek's esteemed editors, most evangelical Christians spend their weekends dancing with snakes and picketing gay nightclubs.

Another Newsweek Conspiracy: 'Greta Thunberg Snubbed for Nobel Peace Prize' By Big OilNewsweek reporter Rosie McCall offered a conspiracy theory as to how a 16-year-old environmental activist somehow failed to win the Nobel Peace Prize this year: [...] This new theory comes courtesy of a magazine fresh off breaking the news that opening tanning salons in urban neighborhoods were a plot to give gay men skin cancer, or something. [...] Such speculation amounts to an insult of the actual Nobel Prize winner, Abiy Ahmed, the prime minister of Ethiopia, who restarted peace talks with neighboring Eritrea and beginning restoring freedoms in Ethiopia.  He helped stop a war, but was barely mentioned by McCall.  A European teenager who performed some angry End Times-style rants was more deserving, in the eyes of the journalists at Newsweek.

Newsweek's 'Muslim Rage': A sickening piece of shock journalism that cheapens a once great magazine.  Sensational covers now seem to be the only way to keep selling the magazine, whether it's declaring Obama to be the first gay president or a recycled picture of asparagus spears and a juicy pair of lips to tease customers into parting with their change.

The 'Hunger' Hoax.  Twenty years ago, hysteria swept through the media over "hunger in America."  Dan Rather opened a CBS Evening News broadcast in 1991 declaring, "one in eight American children is going hungry tonight."  Newsweek, the Associated Press and the Boston Globe repeated this statistic, and many others joined the media chorus, with or without that unsubstantiated statistic.


ABC

The Secrets of ABC News:  Did They Pay $15 Million to Hide Something Even Worse?  ABC News is owned by Disney.  The House of Mouse has deep pockets.  Furthermore, Donald Trump is pushing 80 and in a high-stress job.  He's had a pair of assassination attempts over the past year!  You'd expect a company like Disney to drag out a defamation case.  You know the drill:  Tie up the courts with every objection and delaying tactic imaginable and see if you push the case to 2030 (or whatever).  Hey, Disney can certainly afford the attorney fees!  Besides, it's a smart strategy; there are always exceptions in American law, but more often than not, defamation is considered a personal tort — when the plaintiff dies, so does the case.  So if you're ABC News, why not drag out the case and try to spare yourself the embarrassment?  The answer is obvious:  Paying $15 million, apologizing, and throwing Stephanopoulos under the bus was the best option available, which means the alternative must be worse.

Apparently they learned nothing from the Stephanopoulos fiasco.
ABC News Publishes False Information About Trump Education Nominee.  On Dec. 11, ABC News' Jay O'Brien reported false information about Linda McMahon, President-elect Donald Trump's pick for U.S. secretary of education, on "ABC News Live Prime."  In the first minute of an eight-minute overview, O'Brien stated that McMahon has no formal education training and little experience:  "If she receives Senate confirmation, McMahon, who has no formal teaching training and little experience in education, will be tasked with setting policies for the nation's schools."  This is patently false.  While receiving a bachelor's degree in French at East Carolina University in the late 1960s, McMahon earned a teaching certificate after completing a teacher preparation program at the school.  This information has been available publicly for years, reported in outlets like The Washington Post and USA Today, was confirmed in a Hartford newspaper in 2011, and has been listed in official statements from East Carolina University.

More Lawsuits for ABC? Network Lies About Linda McMahon.  Over the weekend, as Matt covered, ABC News reached a $15 million settlement with President-elect Donald Trump, after "This Week" anchor George Stephanopoulos falsely claimed that Trump had been found liable of rape.  The network may soon be in even further trouble, though, with a report involving Linda McMahon, Trump's pick to head the Department of Education.  [Advertisement]  On Monday, The Daily Signal put out a piece highlighting coverage from ABC News that came out on December 11.  The live report from Jay O'Brien came during "ABC News Live Prime."  [Tweet]  It appears to be part of a pattern of looking to downplay what Trump's nominees bring to the table, though in this instance it goes further than that, considering that O'Brien falsely claimed that McMahon "has no formal training and little experience in education."  In reality, McMahon, decades ago, earned a teaching degree while receiving her bachelor's degree at East Carolina University.

Donald Trump, ABC News, and the toxic legacy of the E. Jean Carroll case.  The story stunned much of Washington late Saturday afternoon.  ABC News had agreed to settle a lawsuit filed by President-elect Donald Trump last March, accusing ABC anchor George Stephanopoulos of defaming Trump during a discussion of the E. Jean Carroll case.  ABC and Stephanopoulos agreed to pay $15 million toward a future Trump Presidential Library, plus $1 million toward Trump's attorneys' fees.  Trump has filed or threatened to file a lot of lawsuits over alleged defamatory coverage.  But he hasn't won one, hasn't even come close to winning one.  Now he has.  The development particularly shocked Trump's most determined adversaries.  He's not supposed to win a case like this!  The media have a right to say virtually anything they want about the former president and current president-elect and not have to worry about Trump having some legal recourse to fight back.  That, at least, was their implicit assumption.

Why ABC News Is Being Forced to Pay Trump $15 Million.  Donald Trump's 2024 wins have not stopped.  The latest victory comes against ABC News, which must pay the president-elect millions over their reckless reports about the E. Jean Caroll civil trial.  In March, ABC Host and former Clinton operative George Stephanopoulos repeated the false claim that Trump had been found liable for rape.  He added that Trump's remarks about Carroll were defaming to a victim of said rape.  That's not what the jury found in that case.  Stephanopoulos was sparring with Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) when he landed the network into legal trouble.  The network also had to pay for Trump's legal costs, and they had to offer an apology.

ABC to Pay for Trump Defamation.  Under current law, it is just about impossible to defame a public figure, let alone a politician, let alone Donald Trump.  But ABC News and George Stephanopoulos managed the feat, and now they are going to pay:  ["]ABC News and star anchor George Stephanopoulos have agreed to pay President-elect Trump $16 million to settle a defamation lawsuit.  The settlement was publicly filed Saturday, just days before the two sides were set to sit for depositions in the case.["]  Stephanopoulos couldn't testify under oath without being humiliated. [...] ABC News lies frequently.  It is good to see them get nailed at least once.

Idiot America Indeed.  Today's post is not about politics but, rather, about contemporary journalism's compulsion to besoil itself in the service of politics.  The excess and carelessness engendered by political servility plopped squarely this week upon the heads of Charles P. Pierce (Esquire magazine) and Ana Navarro-Cárdenas (ABC's The View).  Both sought to justify Joe Biden's sweeping pardon of Hunter Biden by pointing to peculiar antecedents.  Pierce cited George H. W. Bush's pardon of his son Neil, and Navarro-Cárdenas cited Woodrow Wilson's pardon of his brother-in-law Hunter deButts.  Their examples were peculiar because (1) Neil Bush was never convicted or even charged with any crimes, and (2) Hunter deButts never existed.  Navarro-Cárdenas learned of Hunter deButts's pardon from the often-hallucinatory ChatGPT.  Pierce apparently bypassed electronic sources, plumbed purported facts from the depths of his own imagination, shunted them past whatever vestigial fact-checking routines exist at Esquire, and shot them out to gullible readers.  Across the Internet some of those readers are yet spreading the Parables of Neil Bush and Hunter deButts.

'Great Gift, the Gift of Freedom': The View Cheers Hunter Biden Pardon.  Christmas came early over the weekend for the Cackling Coven of ABC's The View.  They got their wish that President Biden pardon his son for his tax and gun crimes.  On Monday's show, fake Republican Ana Navarro boasted about lobbying Biden for this outcome and called it the greatest gift of all "the gift of freedom," meanwhile moderator Whoopi Goldberg was lashing out and raging at those who called Biden out for being a liar.  Of course, since they were an ABC News property, they didn't tell the whole truth that the pardon also covered financial crimes dating back to Biden's time as vice president, which hadn't been charged yet.

'The View' is a pointless, irrelevant, Trump-loathing joke — cancel it.  In my worst nightmares, I find myself trapped on a desert island with the hosts of "The View."  And all day long, I'm subjected to them all snarling, whining, scowling, seething and cursing about the same thing:  Donald Trump.  The nightmares are long, torrid, mentally scarring and always involve the exact same pattern.  "Joyless" Joy Behar, who once wore blackface to a Halloween party — and then lied about it — marches up and down the beach loudly mocking and reviling Trump as a lying, racist hypocrite.  Whoopi Goldberg, who was suspended for saying the Holocaust wasn't about race, sits by the ocean howling that Trump is a deluded, ill-informed, race-baiting imbecile.  Ana Navarro, who said Trump was not elected legitimately in 2016 and spews constant bile-fueled abuse about him, resides under a palm tree, ranting that he's a lying election denier who deploys ugly rhetoric.  Alyssa Farah Griffin, who was once paid $183,000 to be Trump's communications aide at the White House and enthusiastically sold him to America as a brilliant president, paces around seething that he's the worst president of all time.

ABC News Tries to Blame Donald Trump for Laken Riley's Murder.  For those who haven't been following the case closely, Laken Riley, a nursing student living in Athens, Georgia, was brutally murdered in February of this year by illegal alien Jose Ibarra, who is alleged to have ties to the violent Venezuelan gang, Tren de Aragua.  Ibarra was found guilty Wednesday and sentenced to life in prison by Judge Patrick Haggard. [...] Right on cue, the media tried to deflect from the fact that this very preventable crime happened under the watch of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.  ABC News upped the ante of partisan hackery by actually insinuating that Donald Trump, who hasn't been in office since the beginning of 2021, was somehow responsible for Jose Ibarra being in the country and murdering Laken Riley:  [Tweet]

'The View' Co-Host Sunny Hostin Directs Her Post-Election Rage at White People in On-Air Rant.  Present-elect Donald Trump's victory on Tuesday is bringing out the absolute worst in every left-wing media personality just hours after the race was called.  With many eager to see how the shrill panel of "The View" would react to a second Trump term, co-host Sunny Hostin did not disappoint in giving viewers a stupid racist take when looking for a reason that Vice President Kamala Harris lost.  Rather than admitting Harris' many faults during her campaign, Hostin took to blaming the defeat on certain people of a certain race.  [Tweet with video clip]

Was the 2024 Election Too Big to Rig?  Anyone who watches David Muir at ABC, Lester Holt at CBS, Norah O'Donnell at NBC, or Amna Nawaz and Geoff Bennett at PBS will know this election was rigged, thanks to a multi-year propaganda campaign of shameless lying by the news anchors and reporters at the most prestigious networks in America.  If you make it your business to keep track of what these "trusted news sources" are telling voters, it is obvious how hard they've tried to influence the election.  ABC News, for example, pretty much every single night for the last few months, has opened their newscast with 5-10 minutes where they heap slime all over Trump and praise Harris.  If you watch the source material, for example, Harris's CNN Town Hall, then watch the excerpts highlighted on ABC, you get two completely different impressions of her competence and integrity.  Precisely the same tactic is used with Trump, but to the opposite effect.  Watch one of his news conferences in its entirety, then watch what is grabbed, out of context, and presented on ABC.

We Are Proven Correct.  For years now there has been a long-promoted talking point in the press that crimes have gone down in this country during the Biden years.  This claim has been in defiance of surges of violence in places like New York and D.C., the drugs and affiliated crimes with the mounting homeless problem in Los Angeles and San Francisco, and the ongoing reality of store chains closing locations due to perpetual shoplifting going unaddressed and unabated.  Yet the press has tried to sell us on the concept that things have been calming across the nation and that claims of criminality spreading is the result of Republican doom-saying for the sake of the election.  Much like the rosy fable of the economy being strong, despite the financial pains felt by so many, the press promise of a safer nation continues.  It was even a feature during the presidential debate when Donald Trump had to haggle over this, not with his opponent Kamala Harris, but with moderator David Muir.  It has all been a statistical ruse.

Paging David Muir and ABC News.  Moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis of ABC News delivered a frankly disgusting performance during the September presidential debate between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump.  The network had agreed that there would be no fact checks and no interruptions, yet the partisan duo proceeded to do exactly that.  In fact, Trump was fact-checked at least five times, while Harris was left to say whatever the heck she wanted (much of it lies).  Perhaps the most infamous moment came when Muir, using his most arrogant, self-important tone, interrupted Trump on crime statistics.  Yes, the former president fought back and tried to explain why Muir was wrong, but the mission had already been accomplished: they wanted to interrupt Trump's flow, have him go off on some sideline that wasn't germane to the argument he was making — and they succeeded.  If this were Kamala Harris using these tactics, that would have been fine — she's supposed to be trying to trip him up — but to have the supposedly unbiased neutral "moderators" join forces with Kamala was quite simply unethical.

The impenetrable arrogance of the left media.  As the 2024 presidential campaign edges to a close, the arrogance of the left, especially those in the media, is escalating to a fever pitch.  The best example of their tone-deaf hysteria is Martha Raddatz's attempt to humiliate J.D.Vance over what she called lies about FEMA and Tren de Aragua.  People like Raddatz never learn from their egregious, foolish mistakes.  She tried to assert that the reports of FEMA failures were false when everyone with a pulse has heard the hundreds of horror stories from the victims on the ground.  She tried to stop Vance from speaking, so determined was she to push the government-promulgated lie that FEMA has been on the job.  She really stepped in it when she brought up the overtaking of "several apartment complexes" by the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua in Aurora, Colorado, cities in Texas, and Wisconsin.  Raddatz suggested that commandeering these "few apartment complexes" was just a minor annoyance.  She tried to stop Vance from speaking again by saying "I know exactly what happened."  But she hasn't a clue and she clearly has not given the issue any thought.  She has no empathy for the hundreds of people who live in those apartments suffering under these thugs from Venezuelan prisons.  They are not a problem in her neighborhood so it's not a problem.  Therefore, Vance and Trump must be lying.

JD Vance Stunned After Raddatz Minimizes Migrant Gang Takeover Of Apartment Complexes.  Republican Ohio Sen. J.D. Vance appeared shocked Sunday on ABC News when co-host Martha Raddatz interrupted him mid-statement and attempted to downplay Venezuelan gangs' takeover of Colorado apartment complexes.  The Tren de Aragua gang made U.S. headlines in September after officials confirmed ten members were involved in an investigation into a string of alleged criminal incidents at an Aurora, Colorado apartment complex, according to FOX 31.  On ABC's "This Week," Raddatz pressed Vance on former President Donald Trump's response, noting Trump claimed the city had been "invaded and conquered" by migrants, while the mayor called the statement "grossly exaggerated."

Complaints Ask FEC, FCC To Investigate ABC For Breaking Broadcast And Donation Rules In Debate.  Remember that brazenly biased presidential debate on Sept. 10, hosted by ABC television?  The one where ABC moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis "fact-checked" former President Donald Trump five times and Vice President Kamala Harris, not at all?  The one advertised as a legitimate debate that felt more like a 90-minute campaign commercial for Harris?  The Center for American Rights has filed complaints with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Federal Elections Commission (FEC), asking these agencies to hold ABC and its local affiliate accountable on two matters:  an alleged campaign donation violation, and a concern about its television broadcast license.  Unlike print media, broadcast airwaves belong to the public.  While anyone can find some paper, start their own newsletter, and say whatever they want, there is a finite number of airwaves across the broadcast spectrum, so they belong to everyone.  That is why the FCC licenses segments of the airwaves to broadcasters with the condition that they must use a certain amount of their broadcast time to serve the public.

The Editor says...
Ahem.  Yes, there is a finite bandwidth available for broadcast TV, but the FCC apparently doesn't see any shortage, because the UHF-TV band used to extend to Channel 83, and has been gradually pared down as the FCC sold some of the bandwidth (that's right, the frequencies that "belong to everyone") to the highest bidder.  (When did we vote on that?)  Now the UHF-TV band stops at Channel 36, although some stations may have a "virtual channel" number higher than that.  What happened to all the money that the FCC raked in when the upper UHF-TV channels were sold to cell phone companies?  I suspect it either evaporated or went into several money pits, like NASA, Amtrak, football stadiums, Ukraine, ethanol subsidies, windmill subsidies, solar panel subsidies, and hotel rooms for illegal aliens.

It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad Fake Presidential Race.  [Scroll down]  And there is the matter of the anonymous ABC whistleblower, who released an affidavit claiming that he had recordings proving that ABC agreed to "fact check" Donald Trump in advance, as well as not ask certain questions in the debate, as requested by the Harris campaign.  Whether she really had an "audio earring" that was feeding her answers, Harris undeniably was given preferential treatment by the laughable moderators.  One of them, Linsey Davis, was Harris's college sorority sister, after all.  Girlfriends have to stick together.  There have been reports that the ABC whistleblower went on to die in a car crash, reminding us of the precarious shelf life of whistleblowers.  This has been debunked, by the state controlled "fact checkers."  Since we don't know the identity of the whistleblower, how can we know if he's alive?

The Vacuity of Kamala Harris.  The Democrats switched her for the failing president late in the game and hope with the aid of a partisan press and her dodging any real interviews to hide from the public her extreme leftist views.  The debate with ABC struck most of us as a softball one-sided one — more like an interview than a debate — with both "interviewers" (one of whom was her sorority sister) "fact checking" Trump "lies" while allowing her to gibber on with pre-packaged blather.  A whistleblower has provided a credible sworn affidavit (which he wrote a day before the interview) in which he says she was given sample questions similar to those which were actually asked, was promised certain questions would be out of bounds by the interviewers and further, that Trump — but not her — would be "fact checked" by them.  ABC provided a tardy response, which is hardly sufficient. [...] Yes, this reminds us that ABC contributor Donna Brazile fed Clinton the questions "in anticipation of a supposedly unscripted townhall meeting" and ABC helped deflect questions about Biden's failing mental state.

ABC Is a Collapsing House of Cards.  The latest information about ABC News is that moderator Linsey Davis admits the fact checking was aimed at Donald Trump.  This is totally nuts.  It's not acceptable for news agencies protected by the Constitution to do anything like this.  The whistleblower is a hero and we should stand by him.  As reported earlier, moderator Linsey Davis admits fact-checking was only for Trump: [...] ABC News has to get back to reporting the news and abandon activism or they have to stop pretending they are a news service.

ABC responds to viral 'whistleblower affidavit' claiming Kamala Harris received debate help.  ABC News insists it did not break debate rules after a document claiming to be from an anonymous 'whistleblower' said there was close collaboration between the network and Kamala Harris's team before the presidential showdown.  But the network still has not confirmed whether the document was written by an ABC staffer, or where it was filed before it emerged on X.  The unverified document, said to be a sworn affidavit signed by a notary public on September 9, has sparked controversy.  The document alleges ABC News gave Harris questions ahead of the debate, along with agreeing to preconditions to give her a leg up on former President Donald Trump.

The Media's Criminal Misreporting on Crime.  'President Trump, as you know, the FBI says overall violent crime is coming down in this country."  That was ABC News' David Muir "fact checking" Donald Trump during his debate with Kamala Harris.  Two days later, the Bureau of Justice Statistics released the results of its national crime victimization survey, which showed that the number of victims of violent crime was 41% higher in 2023 than in 2020.  There were almost 170,000 more rapes, 300,000 more robberies, 1.4 million more assaults, 300,000 more claims of domestic violence, and almost 400,000 more crimes with a violent weapon.

ABC News hits panic button after sworn statement alleging rigged debate, David Muir does damage control.  ABC News is apparently pressing the panic button in the wake of fierce criticism of its Sept. 10 presidential debate between former President Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris.  A sworn statement by an ABC News whistleblower exposing network bias favoring Harris continues to be in focus regarding "assurances" to the Democrat's campaign days before the event.  Now David Muir, anchor of ABC's "World News Tonight" and co-moderator of the debate, is defending his performance during the matchup, as ratings for his evening news broadcast have plunged some 12% in the aftermath.

Did the Mainstream Media K.O. Kamala?  Shortly after the debate between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, leftist pundits began crowing on social media about how conservatives' complaints about the bias shown by two ABC moderators, David Muir and Linsey Davis, are just proof that Trump had lost the debate. [...] [{I}ndependent voters] were sold a high-stakes prize fight between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, and what they witnessed was the referees methodically landing haymakers against Donald Trump on behalf of Kamala Harris in between punches.  That's very different than a referee innocently making a bad call or two in a football game.  What the average spectator witnessed in the debate was very obviously nothing less than outright cheating.  And if there's one thing most Americans hate, it's a cheater[;] and any honest observer would surmise that ABC conspired with the DNC to cheat in that debate.

Cahoots:
ABC Whistleblower Says Harris Camp Allegedly 'Restricted the Scope' of Trump Debate Questions.  Late last week, there was word that an ABC News whistleblower was set to expose both the network and the Kamala Harris presidential campaign for allegedly rigging the network's Sept. 10th debate in the Democrat nominee's favor and against former President Donald Trump.  The information that they said would be revealed was that Harris was given advance notice on what questions would be asked, and that Trump would be fact-checked live.  Now, the whistleblower has released a sworn, notarized statement, which is dated Sept. 9, 2024 — the day before the debate.  They say the Kamala Harris campaign allegedly "restricted the scope" of the ABC News debate questions, that the campaign allegedly demanded that only Donald Trump would be fact-checked during the debate:  [Tweet]

ABC Moderator Linsey Davis Admits: 'Fact-checking' Was Only Planned for Trump.  ABC News' Linsey Davis, one of two moderators for last week's presidential debate, admitted to the Los Angeles Times that the plan was only to fact-check former President Donald Trump, and not Vice President Kamala Harris.  As Breitbart News noted, Davis and co-moderator David Muir fact-checked Trump seven times — often incorrectly — while never fact-checking Harris once, even when she used hoaxes, such as the Charlottesville "very fine people" hoax.  Davis told the Times that ABC had deliberately targeted Trump — and only Trump — because of perceptions that he had been allowed to get away with false statements in the CNN debate against President Joe Biden in late June.

An ABC employee's sworn affidavit claims ABC cheated to help Kamala win.  The Black Insurrectionist did the legwork and obtained what appears to be a duly signed affidavit from an ABC employee attesting under oath to the network's staggering corruption to ensure that Kamala Harris won her single debate against Donald Trump.  Secret negotiations, bias, squashed issues, sample questions...it's all there.  Of course, we have only this unknown employee's sworn assertion that these things happened but, if they did... oh my!  Here's the tweet with the somewhat redacted affidavit:  [Tweet]  The introductory material in the affidavit says that the employee is a technical and administrative worker who is not endorsing Trump.  He (or she) simply wants what all Americans want — a fair debate allowing Americans to hear what the candidates have to say on the issues that matter most.  The key substantive allegations (which currently have no verification other than this sworn testimony) are as follows: [...]

When does Linsey go work for Kamala?  Less than a week into the debate about ABC's selective fact-finding at the debate, we hear this from Linsey Davis herself. [...] First, thanks to Linsey Davis for admitting that the fact-checking was selective indeed.  No more suspense or questions about that.  Second, who made the decision at ABC that the fact-checking would be selective?  Did Davis and Muir make that call?  Or did the word come from up in the newsroom, the organization, or who knows where?  Mark Penn is right that we need an investigation.  Better than that, maybe someone at ABC can accept responsibility and tell us how something like this could happen.

With fact-checks like these, how does truth stand a chance?  ABC News has been widely criticized for the bias of the two moderators Linsey Davis and David Muir.  Even liberal outlets acknowledged that the two journalists seemed inclined to "fact check" only Trump.  In the meantime, they allowed clearly false statements from Harris go unchallenged.  Three of the unchecked claims are being widely disseminated by supporters, including some in the media.  Here are three legal "facts" that are being repeated despite being clearly untrue.  [#1] "Crime is down under the Biden-Harris administration."  One of the most notable slap downs by ABC followed Trump commenting that crime rates have drastically risen during the Biden-Harris administration.  Muir immediately balked and declared: "As you know, the FBI says overall violent crime is coming down in this country."  Harris and her allies have been repeating the claim by ABC. But the actual statistics show that Trump was right.  The Justice Department's released survey found that, under the Biden administration, there has been a significant increase in crime.  Violent crime was up 37 percent from 2020 to 2023, rape is up 42 percent, robbery is up 63 percent and stranger violence is up 61 percent.

ABC debate moderator Linsey Davis makes stunning admission about all those live Trump fact checks.  ABC News debate moderator Linsey Davis made a stunning admission about their attempts to 'fact check' Donald Trump during his debate with Kamala Harris.  Republicans were furious at ABC News moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis for refusing to fact check Harris on her lies about Trump's views on IVF.  In a new interview, Davis says that it was a conscious decision to do the fact checks after seeing how Trump and Joe Biden performed in the CNN debate in June.

ABC News Caught Grossly Deceptively Editing Kamala Harris' Disastrous Solo Interview.  As RedState reported, Kamala Harris' first solo interview since wresting the nomination away from Joe Biden did not go well.  The vice president seemed ill-prepared, rambling on about things unrelated to the questions being presented by ABC News reporter Brian Taff[.]  One particularly egregious example occurred when she was asked to give just two specific things she'd do to bring down costs for Americans.  What followed was a mind-numbing word salad in which she spent nearly a quarter of the interview (which was only 10 minutes long) rambling about being "middle class."  [Tweet with video clip]  [Transcript]  The above exchange can be seen online by going directly to ABC 6's website.  Guess who didn't see it?  That would be the network's television audience.

Kamala Harris disaster solo interview with ABC Philadelphia was pre-taped, not live.  As bad as the softball interview went for Kamala Harris with ABC in Philadelphia yesterday, there is another important fact to consider.  This interview wasn't even live.  ABC probably spliced and edited the video to make Kamala sound as coherent as she could.  And it was still an epic disaster.  [Four tweets with video clips.]

Meet Debate Moderator David Muir!  Propagandist for ABC News.  In March 2015, ABC news anchor David Muir — moderator of tonight's presidential debate — began the broadcast with a recap of the 2014 police shooting in Ferguson, MO the previous year:  "Ferguson, Missouri:  An unarmed black man, Michael Brown, is shot to death.  The officer is not indicted."  And that was it:  "The officer is not indicted."  Muir failed to acknowledge that the whole "hands up, don't shoot" scenario turned out to be a lie invented by Brown's co-conspirator:  ex-con, Dorian Johnson.  Muir made no mention of the fact that the officer, Darren Wilson, wasn't indicted because he was fully exonerated in two separate investigations.  And Muir certainly neglected to report that Obama's own DOJ had cleared Wilson of any wrongdoing, after a months-long, zealot-driven investigation by Attorney General Eric Holder.  Muir's summary — "Ferguson, Missouri:  An unarmed black man, Michael Brown, is shot to death.  The officer is not indicted" — is nothing short of Goebbels-like propaganda.

And now it's Mark Penn.  The ABC ambush of Trump, originally called the Trump-Harris debate, keeps on keeping on. [...] My main issue for me is: was it a premeditated ambush.  Who wrote the questions?  No questions about China or hostages but lots of questions about 2020.  Who decided to have all of those "fact checks" on cue?  Were the moderators contacted during the debate with information about challenging Trump on this or that?  At some point, as they do with lawfare, good people have to look at the TV and ask if this weaponization of the media is good for the country.  I have no problem with anti-Trump websites or news programs, such as the nightly programming at MSNBC.  However, this was presented to the public as a debate, not another "get Trump" hour.  ABC has a quite a bit to explain on this story.

*IF* This Is True, ABC News Is About to Become Engulfed in a Major Scandal.  I asked yesterday morning whether Kamala Harris' camp got the ABC News debate questions in advance.  The vice president was visibly nervous for the first portion of the debate but got into a groove, especially when she figured out that Donald Trump would take the bait she was chumming. [...] [Tweet]  Harris seemed ready for the questions, which explained her word salad responses, but she never answered any of the questions from moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis.  They did fact-check Trump live, though these interruptions were peppered with fake news — no shock there.  Harris was never pressed for her mountain of lies, and we know why:  an ABC whistleblower is alleging that not only did the Harris camp get questions in advance, but that she was given assurances that she wouldn't be fact-checked by the moderators either.  I'm not saying this is fact, but if this is true, it's a major scandal:  [Multiple tweets] There are bits and pieces of evidence that suggest a rigged game everywhere.  In 2016, Democrats did just that with Hillary Clinton.  Donna Brazile, a CNN contributor at the time, sent the Clinton camp advanced copies of the debate questions.

Linsey Davis Reveals How She, David Muir and ABC News Schemed to Protect Kamala Harris.  ABC News anchor Linsey Davis revealed in a post-debate Los Angeles Times puff-piece profile how she, ABC World News Tonight anchor David Muir and ABC producers schemed to ambush President Trump with 'fact checks' at Tuesday night's presidential debate in Philadelphia with Kamala Harris after watching Trump crush and knock Joe Biden out of the race in their June debate.  The fact checking at the debate was one-sided, with Trump being interrupted by Muir and Davis several times with 'fact checks' while Harris was not 'fact checked' once.  Going into the debate, there was concern about Harris' friendship with a Disney executive who oversees the ABC News division (NY Post excerpt):  ["]Dana Walden, a senior Disney executive whose portfolio includes ABC News, is one of Vice President Kamala Harris' "extraordinary friends," according to a report in the New York Times.  Walden and Harris have known each other since 1994, while their husbands, Matt Walden and Doug Emhoff, have known each other since the 1980s. [...] ["] After the debate it was revealed that ABC did not disclose that Davis is an Alpha Kappa Alpha sorority sister of Harris.

If True, the ABC News Presidential Debate Could Be Rocked by Explosive Scandal.  Anyone who watched the presidential debate hosted by ABC News on Tuesday knows that the moderators were biased and repeatedly fact-checked Trump while letting Kamala Harris's lies go unchallenged.  We kind of expected that to happen, as the bias and conflicts of interests of the moderators and the network as a whole were well established.  However, there are reports now that an ABC News whistleblower is about to come forward with evidence that Kamala was given sample questions before the debate.  [Two tweets]  The reports appear to originate from this post from an X/Twitter user who says he or she will release "an affidavit from an ABC whistleblower regarding the debate."  [Tweet]  "I have just signed a non-disclosure agreement with the attorney of the whistleblower," the post claims.  "The affidavit states how the Harris campaign was given sample question which were essentially the same questions that were given during the debate and separate assurances of fact checking Donald Trump and that she would NOT be fact checked.  Accordingly, the affidavit states several other factors that were built into the debate to give Kamala a significant advantage."

Former top Clinton adviser calls on ABC to launch internal probe into whether debate was rigged.  Mark Penn, a former top adviser to Bill and Hillary Clinton, called Thursday for ABC to launch a formal internal investigation into its news division's planning and execution of this week's presidential debate to determine if there was some effort at "rigging the outcome of this debate."  ABC News came under significant bipartisan criticism because its moderators fact-checked some of Donald Trump's statements but not a single pushback at any made by Kamala Harris.  Trump said Thursday that the debate was three-on-one and declined to participate in another one before the election.  Anchors David Muir and Linsey Davis moderated the first debate between Harris and Trump, which drew 67.1 million viewers, making it the most watched presidential debate since 2008.  But it has drawn scorn from both Republicans and Democrats for giving the appearance of bias. [...] Other publications have disclosed a questionable coziness between Harris and Dana Walden, co-chairman of Disney and who oversees ABC News.  The New York Times quoted Harris as calling their relationship "extraordinary friends," and disclosed that Walden and Harris are neighbors in Brentwood, a wealthy Los Angeles enclave where Ms. Harris and her husband also own a residence.

A forgettable Warped Debate.  The September 10th presidential debate went down as expected. [...] The ABC moderators proved they were predictably and shamelessly biased. [...] Harris's instructions were not to explain her agenda.  She never defended disowning policies that she had embraced as a lifelong, self-confessed, "woke" "radical."  Instead, Harris's threefold strategy was simple enough — and it mostly worked.  One, goad Trump as a coward and racist.  Then smile and call for unity, kindness, and an end to such name-calling. [...] Two, Harris predictably once more reinvented herself.  She erased entirely her upper-middle class, privileged upbringing, as a child of two PhDs.  There was no mention that her radical political career was opportunistically gifted by her insider and paramour fixer, the married Bay-Area left-wing politico Wille Brown, over 30 years her senior.  Instead, Harris became a middle-class child of a struggling small businesswoman. [...] Three, everything else in the debate was outsourced to the ABC "moderators," David Muir and Linsey Davis.  Both apparently calculated that if it was a question between blatantly helping Harris or appearing intellectually and professionally honest, then it was a no-brainer, partisan choice.

The Editor says...
Harris was installed in the office of Vice President as the result of a stolen election in 2020.  Anyone who would accept that position, knowing she doesn't deserve it, would probably not hesitate to accept illicit assistance from the people producing a debate on TV.

ABC Failed to Disclose Debate Conflict of Kamala Harris and Linsey Davis Being AKA Sorority Sisters.  ABC News failed to disclose that Kamala Harris and ABC News anchor Linsey Davis, who co-moderated Tuesday night's debate between Harris and President Trump, are sorority sisters in the influential Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.  AKA formed a PAC in August after Harris became the Democrats' presidential nominee.  The sorority connection is one more possible clue as to why the debate moderated by Davis and ABC World News Tonight anchor David Muir was so one-sided in favor of Harris.  Muir and Davis interrupted Trump numerous times to fact check and argue with him while they did not fact check Harris even one time.  While the sorority connection was not mentioned at the debate, Davis did speak about it during ABC's coverage of the Biden-Harris inaugural in January 2021:  [Tweet]

There's allegedly an affidavit claiming ABC gave Kamala the questions before the debate.  One of the things that was obvious during the debate was that Kamala came in with a lot of memorized material.  Those who like her were impressed by how well-prepared she was.  Those who don't like her noted that she had to memorize everything because she is incapable of answering substantive questions on the fly — and that her memorized answers were platitudes, canned phrases, and blatant lies.  What didn't occur to those of us who dislike Kamala was that the memorized lines invariably went right to the heart of the questions.  Weird, huh?  That perfect alignment of prepared material and questions could, of course, have come about because it was fairly obvious what the moderators would ask.  After all, we knew that they would frame the questions to support Kamala and hurt Trump.  However, we believed that, after the scandal of Donna Brazile giving Hillary the debate questions in 2016, there was no way that the Democrats would try that cheat again.  It turns out that we might have been a bit naïve.

The Debate at the Kitchen Table.  ABC staged a debate this week.  A presidential debate.  Ostensibly between former president Donald J. Trump and former senator Kamala Harris, but in actuality between Trump and the partnership of Harris and ABC.  There is always media bias.  To some extent, unconscious media bias is unavoidable.  But we don't expect it to be blatant; the viewer doesn't expect antics like we saw this week, when the ABC moderators repeatedly declared Mr. Trump's statements lies, and never called out Ms. Harris's blatant lies.  We call it "fact-checking" today, a term coined in social media for when our high-tech overlords punish a writer for stating something with which the gurus disagree.  But it's not really fact-checking, is it?  It's an invasion of a conversation, a denial of free speech, a thumb on the scale.  In the case of a presidential debate, it's electioneering.  And it virtually invalidates the value of our constitutionally protected free press in this process.  ABC's refusal even to try to act as an impartial host rendered this debate useless.

The worst debate in the history of presidential debates.  Not one question Tuesday night about the execution of Hersh Goldberg-Polin and five other hostages two weeks ago, or about any of the Americans murdered by Hamas terrorists on October 7?  Not one question on Iran, which is within weeks of acquiring a nuclear weapon and which is paying and perhaps precisely directing repeated attacks by its proxies on American forces in the Gulf or Arabia, the Red Sea, Iraq or Jordan?  Not one question about the capacity of President Joe Biden to continue as president?  And not one, single fleeting question about the People's Republic of China, and its genocide against the Uyghurs, its oppression of Hong Kong, its threat against Taiwan or the Philippines, or its military buildup, the largest, most expensive peacetime military buildup in history?  Perhaps ABC's parent Disney put the kibosh on questions that would upset the People's Republic of China and endanger the company's theme parks in the country or the release of its movies in China?  Who knows?

The Debate Was So Biased It Was Divorced From Reality.  Trump Should Refuse To Do Another.  Tuesday night during the presidential debate between former President Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris, the fact-checks were flying, but only in one direction.  As expected, ABC News moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis were criminally biased, making the debate effectively three-on-one against Trump and practically amounting to an in-kind donation to the Harris campaign.  The lying and gaslighting were so brazen from Harris, and the "fact-checking" from Muir and Davis so lop-sided (they failed even once to push back or correct any of Harris' obvious falsehoods), that the entire spectacle eventually took on an air of unreality.  It was bizarre to see it happening live on the air.  By the end, my main takeaway was that the purpose of these debates, besides the media's obvious goal of boosting Harris and hurting Trump, is to confuse and demoralize the American people by distorting reality and flooding the internet with lies, making it impossible to know what's true and what's not.

Starve the collapsing corporate media of their sham debates.  I very much doubt that any of what transpired last night moved the needle in any particular direction, and political pundits are often very disconnected from the general public.  So instead of wasting time on more highlights, it's better to consider what can be done to avoid the absolute lunacy we witnessed last night from ABC.  This should be the last election cycle with legacy media debates.  Ever.  No more excuses, GOP.  Just stop accommodating this madness and being complicit in it.  Last night was much more an interrogation of Donald Trump than anything resembling a debate.  "Why won't you recognize the 2020 election?  Do you wish you had done more on Jan 6? Why are you so racist, sir?  Why are you attacking our climate hoax?"  How is any of that considered a debate?  It was the worst debate production of all time and the American people are the biggest losers here.  I don't recall a single question of importance.  It was full clownworld from beginning to end.

ABC's David Muir Lied About Crime Falling Under Biden-Harris.  The ABC moderators for the presidential debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris couldn't have been more biased.  Not once did they fact-check Harris' long list of lies.  But I will leave the fact-checking of David Muir and Linsey Davis' lies to others.  I will focus on only one of Muir's discussions on crime.  DAVID MUIR: "President Trump, as you know, the FBI says overall violent crime is coming down in this country, ..."  In fact, Trump was correct about the increase in crime under Biden.  While violent crime fell by 17 percent under Trump, Biden has seen it rise by 43 percent.  Muir doesn't understand what the FBI is measuring.  The FBI counts the number of crimes reported to police.  Trump was right that less than half of police departments are now giving that data to the FBI, but, more importantly, Trump was discussing what was happening to total crime, not just the number of crimes reported to police.

ABC News Moderators Turned Debate Into A Partisan Show Trial Against Trump.  Millions of Americans tuned in to ABC News on Tuesday for what was supposed to be the first presidential debate of the election.  Instead, they witnessed a one-sided show trial where ABC News served as the judge, jury, and executioner, as pointed out by Turning Point USA Founder Charlie Kirk on X.  ABC News' David Muir and Linsey Davis spent 90 minutes running election interference for Vice President Kamala Harris by ambushing former President Donald Trump.  Rather than addressing soaring inflation, rising gas prices, fake job numbers, and the deadly border crisis, the Bobbsey Twins decided to focus on platitudes while Harris got away with murder — yes, murder.  Not once did Harris have to answer for her border crisis that has left innocent Americans brutally raped and murdered, but then again, she wasn't the one on trial, Trump was.  Muir tried, for example, to pin Jan. 6 on Trump but conveniently omitted that Trump clearly called for a "peaceful" protest that day.

ABC Moderators Called Out as Double Standard Becomes Evident: 'A Disgraceful Failure'.  Tuesday night's debate was by no means a fair fight.  The debate marked the first time that former President Donald Trump clashed with Vice President Kamala Harris.  Many supporters of both candidates — as well as moderates still making up their minds on who to vote for — were looking forward to seeing the two candidates go head-to-head[.]  Unfortunately, Tuesday night's debate didn't provide us with a one-on-one debate.  Instead, it was three-on-one.  ABC's two moderators, news anchors David Muir and Linsey Davis, constantly attacked, fact-checked and pressed Trump to answer questions.  When it came to Harris, the kid gloves were on; they barely pressed her at all, even when she refused to answer questions.

ABC Breaks Its Own Rules Less Than 30 Minutes Into Debate.  ABC News broke the agreed upon rules by allowing Vice President Kamala Harris to interrupt former President Donald Trump as he was answering a question about abortion during Tuesday night's presidential debate.  Trump first explained his position that following the overturning of Roe v.  Wade by the Supreme Court in the summer of 2022, the issue has returned to the states for the people to decide.  Harris pledged to reinstitute Roe v.  Wade by federal law, if elected and if Congress passed the legislation.  Trump respectfully listened as Harris made her points.  [Tweet with video clip]  Harris then claimed that Trump will sign a national abortion ban.  Trump responded, "There she goes again.  It's a lie.  I'm not signing a ban, and there's no reason to sign a ban because we've gotten what everybody wanted."  [Tweet with video clip]

Blaming the Moderators Is Not Enough.  Project 2025.  Charlottesville.  "Bloodbath."  Trump's Afghanistan plan.  ABC News' debate "moderators" David Muir and Linsey Davis were partisan hacks who operated on behalf of Kamala Harris throughout the night.  They "fact-checked" Donald Trump 11 times while allowing multiple lies from Harris to go unchecked.  In fact, they didn't fact-check a single one of her many lies.  And this is a good thing... at least it could be.  For the Trump campaign, it's a GREAT thing if they choose to capitalize on it.  They are already noting how badly the moderators acted.  [Tweets]  This is good.  We want everyone to know that the debate, like so many things in this and previous elections, was rigged.  But it can't end there.  The Trump team and his surrogates MUST do what ABC News failed to do.  They must fact check Harris themselves.  Here's a good start.  [Tweet with video clip]

Fact Check:  ABC Moderators Silent As Kamala Harris Repeats Hoaxes About Trump and Race.  CLAIM: Kamala Harris claimed that Donald Trump "refused to rent property to black families" and called for the "execution" of the Central Park Five.  VERDICT: FALSE.  These are both inaccurate claims, which the ABC News moderators allowed to stand uncorrected.  ABC News' Linsey Davis and David Muir frequently tried to fact-check former President Trump and never once did the same to Vice President Harris — and it wasn't because she was telling the truth.  In a responding to a question about race, Harris claimed that Trump had "refused to rent property to black families."

3 on 1: Trump Clashes With Harris — and the Debate 'Moderators'.  ABC's debate moderators' performance in Tuesday night's presidential debate made CNN's performance in June look like a master class in fairness, objectivity, and balance.  It was exactly the kind of debate moderation left-wing commentators on X have been demanding for months — years, really.  They don't want anything approaching objectivity.  They wanted moderators to "fact-check" former President Donald Trump every step of the way while allowing his opponent to pontificate on questions they think will be beneficial to Democratic Party fortunes.  And that's essentially what happened.  ABC News anchors David Muir and Linsey Davis continually "fact-checked" Trump in real time, arguing with him after nearly every answer.  That makes for a horrible debate format.

ABC News 'Moderators' Made a Joke of the Presidential Debate.  If moderators do their job correctly, nobody talks about them afterward.  Unless one becomes a legendary moderator like Jim Lehrer, debate watchers don't remember who the moderator was. [...] Not a single sentient being expected ABC News moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis to be impartial in any way given their history of reporting on the candidates, but the partisanship and unequal treatment of the candidates went far beyond any expectations and set a new standard for how not to moderate a debate.  Muir and Davis repeatedly fact-checked Trump (with questionable or outright false "facts"); jumped in to help Harris when she was floundering by switching topics or interjecting "gotcha" questions at Trump; bird-dogged Trump to pin him down on a yes-or-no answer while not doing the same to Harris; ignored blatant lies by Harris, and inserted their own opinions and thoughts about Trump's answers.

On 'The View,' Kamala Harris Is a 'Moderate,' She Isn't a 'Leftist'.  As has been the case with the left-wing media, "The View" ladies yet again asked "us" (their equally delusional viewers) to suspend disbelief and buy into the preposterous notion that Harris is a "moderate."  Sara Haines kicked off the festivities. [...]

George Stephanopoulos Claims Trump and His Voters are Responsible for the Assassination Attempt.  A pair of ABC News personalities on Sunday morning argued that Donald Trump and his supporters bear responsibility for the attempt on his life that took place when a gunman shot him at a Pennsylvania rally the night before.  "Violent rhetoric" from Trump and the millions of Americans who agree with his policies was to blame for the 45th president's brush with death, argued George Stephanopoulos and Martha Raddatz.  "President Trump and his supporters have contributed to this violent rhetoric as well," said Stephanopoulos, a well-known Democrat and former senior advisor to Bill Clinton.

George Stephanopoulos Blames Trump and Trump Supporters' "Violent Rhetoric" for Shooting.  It's oddly suspicious that the leading presidential candidate was almost murdered last night in front of tens of thousands of supporters and millions watching at home as he faces off against Joe Biden, a man who can't string a sentence together and has weaponized the government against political opponents and dissidents since day one in office.  Here's a clip of Democrat media personalities, celebrities, and politicians fear-mongering, calling for violence, and even calling for Trump's assassination over the years:  [Advertisement]  [Video clip]

George Stephanopoulos:  A Cast Study in America's Psychological Warfare.  Many Americans are paying attention to daily news events.  But more need to see beyond the daily events to the larger plot.  Part of that larger plot involves understanding that we're now living in an environment of psychological warfare. [...] Certain peeks behind certain curtains can offer glimpses into dynamics that are usually hidden beneath the surface.  Enough peeks can transform suckers into seers.  This isn't easy to do but a recent incident can help make it clear.  Anyone interested in learning the evil magician's tricks could study the encounter between George Stephanopoulos and Nancy Mace on March 9th.  First, a quick aside:  Stephanopoulos once worked as press secretary for Bill Clinton.  He was paid to manage narratives to help achieve Democrat/communist political agendas.  From there, he became Chief Anchor at ABC News.  This fact alone should have alarmed us long ago — a blinking red warning sign that there's something profoundly off about journalism and media today.  It's absurd.  In a media system that is what it pretends to be, Stephanopoulos — a Democratic operative pretending to be a journalist — and the executives who hired him would have been fired long ago, and ABC would have been discredited as a news organization for even trying.

Trump Sues ABC News, Host George Stephanopoulos for Defamation.  Former President Donald Trump filed a lawsuit on Monday against the American Broadcasting Companies (ABC) and ABC News host George Stephanopoulos, accusing them of defamation.  The complaint alleges that Mr. Stephanopoulos defamed President Trump on March 10, during an episode of "This Week With George Stephanopoulos," when he repeatedly stated during the broadcast that a jury had found President Trump liable for the rape of writer E. Jean Carroll, despite being "aware of the truth."  "These statements were and remain false, and were made by Defendant Stephanopoulos with actual malice or with a reckless disregard for the truth given that Defendant Stephanopoulos knows that these statements are patently and demonstrably false," the complaint reads.  President Trump's complaint alleges that Mr. Stephanopoulos was aware that the jury did not find the former president liable for rape, "yet still falsely stated otherwise."

The Amorality of ABC's George Stephanopoulos.  It is probable that ABC's Good Morning America host George Stephanopoulos genuinely feels he did nothing wrong in publicly assaulting rape victim Nancy Mace.  His sleazy past portrays a politically obsessed hatchet-swinger without conscience.  Last Sunday, Stephanopoulos savaged Rep. Mace of South Carolina.  Though her appearance had been proposed as an opportunity to share insights on 2024's presidential contest, the devious GMA host opened the segment by attacking the victim of a teenage rape.  [Brief transcript]  With that, Stephanopoulos launched his ambush offensive.  The miniature monster included numerous lies in that single paragraph.  There were no juries in the Trump/E. Jean Carroll case.  The former president was not found liable for rape, but rather "sexual abuse" — that's a pivotal legal distinction.  During her retort, Mace insisted "I'm not going to sit here on your show and be asked a question meant to shame me about another potential rape victim."  The GMA host purred that he had done no such thing, though all watching had just witnessed him doing precisely that.

George Stephanopoulos Lies About Trump and 'Rape'.  CLAIM: ABC News' George Stephanopoulos claimed that former President Donald was "found liable for rape by a jury."  VERDICT: FALSE.  A jury in New York found that Trump was not liable for rape in a lawsuit brought by E. Jean Carroll.  Stephanopoulos repeatedly claimed, as he interviewed Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC), that Trump had been found "liable" for "rape."  In fact, he was found not to be liable; he was found liable for "sexual abuse" and, later for defamation.  There are problems with both of those verdicts, but even if Trump were liable (in a civil sense, not a criminal one, as Mace noted), the fact is that he was never found liable for rape.  And it borders on defamation for Stephanopoulos to claim otherwise.

ABC Freaks Over 'No Evidence' for Biden Impeachment, Implies It's Illegal.  As we saw on Wednesday morning and evening, ABC News was almost foaming on Thursday's Good Morning America with a half-dozen shrieks of "no evidence" over House Republicans voting to formally launch an impeachment inquiry into President Biden and allegations he was enriched by foreign business dealings involving his corrupt son Hunter (and brother Jim).  At one point, they even implied it might not even be constitutional.

Anchor Diplomacy:  ABC's Muir Asks Bibi Six Times For A 'Humanitarian Pause' In Gaza.  One is left wondering what, exactly, ABC World News Tonight anchor David Muir tried to accomplish during his interview with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, which very quickly veered into a negotiation over the long sought-after "humanitarian pause" in Gaza.  Watch this condensed excerpt of the interview, wherein Muir presses Netanyahu, on SIX different occasions, for said humanitarian pause:  [Video clip]

Disney-owned ABC News profiles child identifying as transgender at 3 years old: 'I'm a girl person'.  ABC News, a company owned by Disney, published a sympathetic profile about parents in Texas who claim their child came out as transgendered at age 3.  "When she was 3, one day, she told me, 'I'm a girl person,' a parent told ABC News in a story published Sunday.  It was National Daughters Day "and she said, 'Can I be your daughter?' — which made me cry," the mother, who went by "Susan" for the story, told ABC News.

The Editor says...
The incident described above almost certainly didn't happen the way it is described.  How many people have heard of "Daughters Day?"  How many three-year-olds have a vocabulary that includes "daughter?"  In the absence of social media and the lust for fame, how many parents would change the way they treat a three-year-old son based on one transient exploratory question?

Host of The View, Anna Navarro Says Even a Black or Hispanic Person Can Be a White Supremacist.  Ana [sic] Navarro:  "Being Hispanic or being black or being anything does not make you immune from being racist, from being radicalized, from being a white supremacist."  [Video clip]

ABC News Admits It Censored RFK Jr. Interview For "False Claims About Covid-19 Vaccines".  In a remarkable video, ABC News presented a pre-recorded interview with presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy, telling viewers that parts of what was said had been edited out because he said something about the COVID vaccine that the news network disagrees with.  The interview was aired with clear edits made during parts where Kennedy spoke about his views on vaccines.  The interviewer Linsey Davis asked RFK Jr. about his belief that vaccination was linked to autism, which he began to explain before she jumped in and claimed that has all been debunked.  The footage then skipped to a different topic entirely.  After the interview concluded, Davis told viewers "We should note that during our conversation, Kennedy made false claims about the Covid-19 vaccines."  She claimed "Data shows that the Covid-19 vaccine has prevented millions of hospitalizations and deaths from the disease." [...] "We've used our editorial judgment in not including extended portions of that exchange in our interview," Davis explained.

The Editor says...
Who is Linsey Davis?  Is she a doctor?  Is she a lawyer?  Does she claim to know more about vaccines than the person she was interviewing?

"47 USC 315 makes it illegal for TV networks to censor Presidential candidates"
ABC News censors RFK Jr. interview remarks on Covid vax problems, may have violated federal law.  Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. is a bigger problem for the Democrats and their media arm than they realized.  The blowback from an interview with Linsey Davis that aired Thursday on ABC demonstrates the nature of the problem.  You see, before airing the taped interview, ABC censored his comments attacking the effectiveness and safety of the Covid vaccines. [...] I rarely watch ABC, but I assume that it, like other network television broadcasters, airs lots of ads for pharmaceutical makers, who have become some of the biggest television advertisers of all ever since their ads were permitted (a bad idea, in my book).

ABC 'News' Edits Out Robert F. Kennedy's Jr's Covid Vaccine Comments.  ABC News aired an interview with Democratic presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. this week.  The interview did not air in full.  Rather, ABC edited the conversation to exclude Kennedy's commentary on Covid-19 vaccines.  ABC News Live anchor Linsey Davis announced the edit on air.  Like the good little girl she is, she read what her bosses wrote verbatim:  "We should note that during our conversation, Kennedy made false claims about the COVID-19 vaccines.  We've used our editorial judgment in not including portions of that exchange in our interview. [...]" [...] The corporate press holds itself up as a group of experts.  But it's far from that.  Particularly when deducing what is "false."  The same network that censored RFK on the topic of the vaccine long told viewers the vaccine would stop the spread.  It did not.  ABC reported that the jab would prevent infection.  It did not do that either.  The outlet parroted the talking point that the virus originated in a wet market.  Yet, the U.S. Energy Department and the FBI say no, the virus most likely formed in a Wuhan lab.  Another conspiracy turned reality.  ABC promulgated the idea that plexiglass barriers worked.  That cloth masks were effective.  That school closures protected children And that our "experts" accurately counted the fatality rate.  Wrong.  All of it.  ABC "News" proved itself to be a beacon of Covid untruths.  Yet it has the gall to suppress an interviewee and accuse him of spreading vaccine misinformation.

The media-Deep State mind meld.  ABC recently went so far as to blur out the front of the podium at which Donald Trump was delivering his post-indictment speech, so those watching couldn't see the number that was placed there for them to text if they wanted to receive official campaign notifications and updates.  Yet no network has ever deigned to prevent people from reading any message on any podium at which Joe Biden was speaking, before or after he became president.

Mass Shooting Statistics.  When a mass murderer shot her way into a Nashville school on Monday and killed six people, most Americans reacted with horror.  Gun control advocates, however, viewed it as an opportunity.  President Joe Biden, for example, saw the crime as a chance to promote an "assault weapon" ban.  Randi Weingarten, the president of the American Federation of Teachers, responded with a call for gun confiscation.  The corporate media pitched in with a spate of stories claiming that mass shootings literally occur on a daily basis in the United States.  ABC News, for example, ran a story titled, "There have been more mass shootings than days in 2023, database shows."  In order to take this headline seriously, it's necessary to believe that more than 90 mass shootings have occurred since the beginning of the year.  This is obviously not true, so where did ABC get its information?

What Is Going On At 'The View'?  The Disney-owned ABC political talk show program, "The View," hasn't had true conservative representation on its daytime panel since Meghan McCain's 2021 retirement.  After a few conservative sit-ins offered an occasional rebuke to the unhinged commentary peddled by the four permanent co-hosts, the producers who tested new hires for McCain's replacement ultimately went with another talking head from CNN.  "I was told when I left, they were looking for a real conservative," McCain told Variety Magazine in the fall of 2021.  "I gave them a list.  None of them have tested."  If the panelists really wanted an on-air challenge, they could have brought on Ann Coulter, who wasn't even offered a chance to audition.  Alyssa Farah Griffin, on the other hand, checked the boxes "The View" actually wanted, as a Trump defector happy to reverse herself on nearly every issue to land lucrative television gigs.

ABC Appalled Armed Robber Got Stopped By Armed Good Samaritan.  Seemingly on the side of criminals, ABC's Good Morning America was appalled on Monday [1/9/2023] after they learned that an armed good Samaritan in Houston, Texas shot and killed an armed robber who was holding up an entire restaurant.  They portrayed the hero as ducking police and the source of the fear in the restaurant that night.  All of this was part of their anti-gun narrative that bars even defensive uses of firearms.

'The View' is the biggest source of misinformation in America.  Barbara Walters died last week at 93, but the legendary journalist's legacy lives on:  "The View," the daytime-TV talker she created in 1997, is the most-watched — and most-talked-about — show in its genre.  Some legacy, though: What Walters envisioned as "women of different generations, backgrounds and views" discussing "the topics of the day, mixing humor with intelligent debate," devolved after she departed as co-host in 2014 into a four-against-one daily catfight with few laughs and even fewer smarts.  The New York Times calls it "the most important political TV show in America."  If so, America is in trouble — because "The View" is the biggest source of misinformation in the country.  More than 2.4 million people watch "The View" every day — and are less informed for it every day.  The show's moderator is one of its worst offenders.

Texas governor blasts 'clueless' media after ABC reporter suggests GOP to blame for border crisis.  Gov. Greg Abbott, R-Texas, ripped into the media after a veteran ABC journalist suggested Republicans' rhetoric is partially to blame for the crisis at the southern border.  Abbott responded Tuesday to a clip from his interview with Martha Raddatz after she said she had never heard President Biden use the term "open border" while instead recounting such rhetoric from Abbott, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, and former President Donald Trump.  Abbott told "Jesse Watters Primetime" that Raddatz's claim that such messaging "reverberates in Mexico and beyond" while being acted upon by cartel smugglers is simply untrue.

ABC's Raddatz Blames Trump, DeSantis & Abbott for Border Crisis.  On ABC's This Week, during her interview with Texas Republican Governor Greg Abbott, co-moderator Martha Raddatz suggested that Republican messaging on the border is what's causing the massive influx of migrants pouring across the southern border.  According to Raddatz, Republicans stating aloud the fact that the border isn't secured, is the reason for the border crisis, not the fact that the border is unsecured.  "You talk about the border wall, you talk about open borders, I don't think I've ever heard President Biden say, we have an open border come on over," Raddatz said.  "But people I have heard say it are you, are former President Trump, Ron DeSantis, that message reverberates in Mexico and beyond.  So they do get the message that it is an open border and smugglers use all those kinds of statements," Raddatz ridiculously claimed.

They lie, and nobody cares but us.  We all like to make fun of The View. [...] Nobody who follows politics even moderately closely takes them seriously.  But The View gets a lot of views, and as with late night hosts who spread disinformation behind the mask of telling jokes, nobody can or does hold them to account for being liars.  And they aren't only stupid, they are liars and propagandists.  They serve a purpose in the media ecosystem, training their viewers to hate and be scared of anybody who opposes The Narrative™.  They often know that what they are spewing is false, and know they will not be held to account.

Turning Point USA Issues Cease and Desist Letters to ABC News Calling on Them to "Retract The Defamatory Statements".  Turning Point USA is a powerful conservative activist organization dedicated to fighting woke college agendas.  The Radical Left and the Fake News Media will do anything to stop them from exposing the indoctrination on college campuses.  Turning Point's recent Student Action Summit event in Florida featured top conservative speakers, including President Trump and Governor Ron Desantis.  The View's angry leftist co-hosts made false claims on the air about the student activist organization on Monday, saying that they welcomed alleged "neo-nazi" protestors into an event.

Turning Point Just Nuked 'The View' for Their 'Defamatory Statements'.  Anyone who watches "The View" expecting to get something even close to news or, for that matter, accuracy would be sorely mistaken.  They've shown over and over again they have problems with basic facts. [...] "The View" and their silliness were back in the news after they started spreading all kinds of nonsense about the Turning Point USA event in Tampa that had a Neo-Nazi group show up outside the event.  We reported about the group and our own Deputy Managing Editor Brandon Morse, who was at the Turning Point event, mocked them.  Even though Turning Point formally denounced the Neo-Nazi group, "The View" harpies still spread false statements.  Joy Behar claimed that the Nazis were outside the event and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis "did nothing," but he wasn't even at the event then — he'd been there the day before.  Then Whoopi Goldberg said, even though Turning Point denounced the Nazi group, "But you let them in, and you knew what they were."  That was a lie — they were never allowed into the event and they didn't even try to get in.  The group was protesting the event outside on the sidewalk.

Update:
'The View' Bends the Knee, Formally Apologizes to TPUSA for 'Nazi' Smear.  The far-left daytime talk show "The View" may have gained another co-host over the last few days after former Mike Pence staffer Alyssa Farrah completed her grift for the job.  But the show almost gained a lawsuit as well.  The backstory involves a series of delusional rants made by Whoopi Goldberg and Joy Behar on Monday regarding the recent TPUSA summit in Florida.  In an attempt to trash Gov. Ron DeSantis, the two hosts claimed that TPUSA had let "nazis" into their conference and tried to draw a line between them and the Florida governor.  That was, of course, completely false, and was known to be false at the time.  In fact, RedState's own Brandon Morse was on the ground and filmed himself mocking the "nazis."  There was no support for them there, and TPUSA had no connection to the group.

The harridans on 'The View' got rebuked by their own legal department.  Turning Point USA had its summit in Florida last week and, predictably, a lot of manifestly fake Nazis showed up, to imply that American conservatives, who are dedicated to individual liberty, are in fact National Socialists, who are, well, socialists.  Only very stupid people would believe that this small group with their fresh-out-of-the-package banners were Nazis — and that brings me to the gals on ABC's The View.  Their credulous opinings were so bad that ABC had to read a statement rejecting their assertions about Turning Point USA.

Democrats always know corporate media will help them.  In conservative communications circles, operatives often lament, "It must be so easy to be a Democrat."  The frustration is always there because the bulk of the corporate media sees the world the same way as Democrat office holders and candidates, and the battle for favorable — or even neutral — coverage is never-ending and sometimes seemingly unwinnable.  Constantly, there are new examples that illustrate the point.  Just this past Tuesday, Democratic Reps.  Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ilhan Omar were among other lawmakers "arrested" during a pro-abortion protest in front of the U.S. Supreme Court.  The members of Congress were cited for blocking the street after repeated warnings to move, escorted to a nearby "staging area," and provided snacks and water while they took self-congratulatory selfies.  Naturally, there were plenty of news cameras present and ABC was able to snap the money shots of Ms. Ocasio-Cortez and Ms. Omar being led away, apparently with their hands cuffed behind their backs.  That image was blasted out to ABC News' 17.6 million Twitter followers.  Only there weren't any handcuffs.

Joy Behar claims, with zero evidence, voting rights [are] being stripped from Black people.  Joy Behar, co-host of 'The View' has claimed that voting rights are being taken away from African Americans.  She made this claim during an episode celebrating Juneteenth and provided no evidence to back up her bold claim.  [Video clip]  Joy Behar said:  "We should be aware on a day like this that voting rights are being systematically taken away from African Americans and other people too in this country... It's a good day to reflect on that, I think."  However, Behar's comment lacked any evidence or information to back it up.  She did not voice concerns over any particular politics, bills, or anything that would indicate anyone has lost the right to vote.

ABC News altered photo
Did ABC News Alter Texas Shooter Salvador Ramos's Photo To Appear More Caucasian?  Salvador Ramos an 18-year-old opened fire on students and faculty at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas on Tuesday, killing 19 children and 2 adults before being killed by law enforcement.  The shooter reportedly killed his own grandmother before fleeing the scene, crashing his vehicle, and entering the school.  Officers reportedly engaged the shooter, who was clad in body armor, before he entered the school.  Ramos was a student at Uvalde High School who lived in the small city 80 miles west of San Antonio.


Media suddenly incurious about January 6 when the narrative stops going the Democrats' way.  The media and others are in full campaign mode for 2022, and it seems the only story they focus on is January 6, where there was a protest.  The FBI said it wasn't an insurrection.  Why do the media and other Democrats repeat that lie?  This week, the story is that Mark Meadows was warned by intelligence that there might be violence.  That clearly means that Pelosi, Schumer, Schiff, and others were warned yet did nothing.  Yet no stories about them, and no subpoenas asking about what they knew. [...] I watch ABC News every night, and they seem to have something on January 6 but rarely anything about the illegal activity at the border.  A border guard died last week saving someone, yet I didn't see the story.  The Russian collusion story was the greatest threat to our republic in my lifetime, yet when Durham has a new filing, most of the media still don't cover it because that is Democrats threatening our elections.

Politico/Morning Consult poll shows majority support for Florida sex-ed limits.  So what happened in that ABC-Ipsos poll this week?  That one supposedly showed Americans in widespread opposition to the Florida legislation, but it smelled bad from the start.  ABC and Ipsos acknowledged that they had oversampled LGBTQ respondents in a 622-person sample, a very strange outcome for a supposedly scientific poll of randomly surveyed Americans (not registered voters).  As I suggested on Monday, this looks like a cooked sample that intended to deliver an editorial narrative rather than tell the truth: ["]Are we to believe that it's a coincidence that ABC/Ipsos just so happened to oversample this community on a polling question that directly relates to them?  Especially given the smaller sample size for a national poll (622 adults, not registered voters), it would appear that the pollster focused on specific localities where one would normally find a greater-than-usual percentage of LGBTQ respondents.  If the calls were made mostly in urban areas, and perhaps especially in urban areas known for a more robust LGBTQ culture, then it would not only explain the oversample but also the results from non-LGBTQ-identifying adult respondents.["]

Lady Failing at Filling Form Deemed Voter Suppression in Texas By ABC.  Early voting in Texas has been going on for a week but Monday's [2/21/2022] Good Morning America on ABC highlighted a supposed voter suppression case where they complained it took the woman "28 days" to cast her ballot.  It was the case of Pam Gaskin, the same woman CNN highlighted last week with the same convoluted, conflicting, and now-evolving story about how Republicans were suppressing her right to vote because she filled out the application incorrectly.  "[M]ore than a dozen states across the country have already passed laws making it tougher for people to vote.  But we're getting the test of that in Texas where one voter says it took her 28 days before she could finally cast her ballot," announced congressional correspondent Rachel Scott at that top of the segment while failing to disclose Gaskin's history as an elections activist, which she bragged about on CNN.  Complete with emotional music in the background, Scott told the story of Gaskin and her husband (who wasn't mentioned in the CNN report): [...]

The Editor says...
And of course the alleged victim in this case is black.  The news media, as far as I know, has never pointed to an eligible white person who was unable to vote.  This says something about the news media's attitude toward blacks.

'The View' hosts' most blatant COVID misinformation and panic moments.  ABC daytime gabfest "The View" has produced plenty of melodramatic commentary, viral moments and occasional outright misinformation on the COVID-19 pandemic.  Here are 10 examples.  [#1] Sunny Hostin suggests '1 percent' of youths who get COVID-19 will die:  Co-host Sunny Hostin drastically overstated the percentage of coronavirus deaths among younger people during a Tuesday [2/8/2022] discussion on the liberal daytime talk show over the lifting of mask mandates in schools.  Hostin said she didn't want her children to be part of the "one percent" of those who get intubated and die from COVID-19, but federal health data shows the risk of dying for those under 17 from COVID-19 is far less than that. [...] According to the CDC there have been 770 deaths from the coronavirus in children up to age 17, through the end of January.  There have been nearly 10 million known cases of the coronavirus in the same age group, making the death rate approximately 0.008%, with countless cases unreported.

ABC News distorts history, facts to defend Joe Biden's stalled agenda.  ABC News wants you to believe a lone senator is solely responsible for "setting back" President Joe Biden's multitrillion-dollar climate and social spending bill.  This is true so long as you ignore the other 51 lawmakers opposing the measure.  "A single senator is about to seriously set back an entire presidential agenda," ABC reported Friday in a breaking news alert.  Its report, titled "Power of one:  Manchin is singularly halting Biden's agenda," reads:  "In an extraordinary display of political power in the evenly split 50-50 Senate, a single senator is about to seriously set back an entire presidential agenda."

Media peddling a new 'climate change' lie.  The lead story on ABC news on Monday November 1st was a blatant, intentional lie spreading propaganda on climate change to mislead the public.  It is tremendously sad and dangerous that so much of what is purported to be news today is Democrat talking points used to pass their radical leftist agenda to destroy America. [...] Most of the media and other Democrats have lied for decades about the existential threat of climate change supposedly caused by humans and fossil fuels.  Not once do we see scientific data, or facts showing a direct causal relationship because facts don't matter, only the agenda and power.  I hope enough American people wake up and do not submit to the draconian measures being proposed which will cause the U.S. to commit economic suicide.

Critics Accuse ABC Of Selective Editing In Obama Interview.  ABC News is being accused of selective editing following the release of an interview with former President Barack Obama.  The recently aired interview on Good Morning America shows Obama scolding Republicans over immigration reform.  However, analysts quickly pointed out the news network excluded Obama's warning about open borders.  ABC ultimately conceded and included the clip online, eventually airing it, but not until late in the night.  [Tweet with video clip]

Reporters Say Wuhan Lab Leak Theory Was Disregarded Because It Came From GOP.  A number of reporters from mainstream media outlets have recently admitted that the Wuhan "lab leak" theory was originally dismissed because it came from Republicans.  Jonathan Karl, ABC News Washington correspondent admitted to ABC's "This Week" host on Sunday [5/30/2021] that the lab leak theory was not taken seriously because it came from the Trump administration but, "now serious people are saying it needs a serious inquiry."  "Yes, I think a lot of people have egg on their face," Karl said.  "This was an idea that was first put forward by Mike Pompeo, secretary of state, Donald Trump, and look, some things may be true even if Donald Trump said them.  Because Trump was saying so much else that was just out of control ... he said flatly this came from that lab, and it was widely dismissed ... but now serious people are saying it needs a serious inquiry."  Besides Trump and Pompeo, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) argued that the origin of the virus should be investigated because it does not appear to have come from the animal market, as claimed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

'There's No Liberal Bias': Joy Behar Claims News Outlets Are 'Basically Balanced' Except For Fox And MSNBC.  Joy Behar claimed Wednesday that most news outlets — with the exceptions of Fox News and MSNBC — are "basically balanced."  Behar joined a discussion on ABC's "The View" about recent corrections on Fox News — on reports of Vice President Kamala Harris' book being distributed at the U.S.-Mexico border and that President Joe Biden planned to limit red meat consumption — and argued that because there were both liberals and conservatives on all of the major outlets, they were effectively balanced.

Death of Capitol Police Officer After Protest May Not Be as Initially Reported.  The death of Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick was a tragedy.  But as it turns out, the facts originally reported about his death may not have been accurate.  The initial story implied that he died from an attack by protesters at the Capitol, it was even reported that he was hit with a fire extinguisher.  Apparently though, the facts as of this moment are not there to confirm that claim.  Yet that has gone everywhere as "facts."  Indeed, according to ABC, they are reporting that Sicknick's death may have been "driven by a medical condition." [...] Now his death may have been been related to interactions with the protesters, but we should wait until the evidence is in.  People are being whipped up based on unconfirmed or outright false reports, in a highly charged political climate.  Meanwhile, folks on the left on Twitter are spreading a video which they allege is Sicknick being beaten to death by Trump supporters, after his family asked people not to make his passing political.  It isn't him and it's not entirely clear what the video shows.

The Editor says...
[#1] Beating a cop with a fire extinguisher doesn't sound like something a Republican would do.  But it does sound like something an Antifa infiltrator would do.  [#2] I'm sure the Twitter Thought Police will remove the video if it's being used to spread misleading ideas.

ABC News Claims Accusing Black Lives Matter of Being Communist is Disinformation.  Before the election, the media rolled out repeated fact checks that Biden hadn't eulogized a KKK Exalted Wizard, but a KKK Grand Cyclops.  Put this ABC News hand wringing over Black Lives Matter in the same category.

ABC Town Hall Masquerades Anti-Trump Activists as 'Uncommitted' Voters.  Multiple voters characterized by ABC News as undecided — and selected to pepper President Donald Trump with questions during a network town hall — are longtime Trump critics.  While the network claimed its Tuesday [9/15/2020] town hall "provided uncommitted voters the opportunity to ask the president questions about issues affecting Americans," a Washington Free Beacon review of social media posts found that two of the questioners have long denounced Trump.  Kutztown University professor Ellesia Blaque — whom ABC repeatedly identified as "uncommitted" in its coverage of the town hall — praised vice presidential candidate Kamala Harris during the Democratic primary, saying she would "be there, volunteering" for the California senator in Pennsylvania.  The English professor was not shy about her partisanship, calling Trump a [series of derogatory names] in a slew of 2019 tweets.  She is a self-described "liberal Democrat," according to her Facebook profile, [...]

ABC News downplays good news in latest jobs report.  The latest unemployment report issued by the government was unexpectedly positive, but readers wouldn't know it from the tweet ABC News issued Friday morning [9/4/2020].  [Tweet]  While the tweet correctly noted the number of jobs added last month, it also said that the unemployment rate fell "slightly" to 8.4% from July.  Slightly?  In July ,the government reported that the unemployment rate was 10.2%.  Expectations by economists predicted that the August rate would be in the neighborhood of 9.8% which would qualify as a slight improvement.

ABC: Joe Biden Isn't Senile, You Guys, That's Just What The Russians Want You To Think.  Has anyone noticed a slowdown with Joe?  He isn't drooling, he isn't muttering to himself any more than plenty of other people do, but something seems different.  Or maybe rather than different, something seems deeply familiar.  No, it isn't the sort of cognitive decline we've all seen with loved ones.  Rather, according to ABC's latest nuke, the encroaching senility that has our former vice president hiding in his basement is simply... Russian propaganda.  Don't laugh!  This is serious stuff.  National security!  It took four reporters, with help from a fifth to write this story.  It runs nearly 1,600 words.

Now the riots are intensely peaceful.
ABC News mocked for claiming 'peaceful demonstration intensified,' with courthouse set ablaze, police officers targeted.  ABC News was mocked on Sunday for describing an California protest that featured demonstrators setting fire to a courthouse, vandalizing a police station and shooting fireworks at police officers, as "peaceful."  "Protesters in California set fire to a courthouse, damaged a police station and assaulted officers after a peaceful demonstration intensified," ABC News' verified Twitter account wrote to promote an article headlined, "Oakland protesters set fire to courthouse and vandalize."  Much of the mainstream media and the left have sought to paint sometimes violent protests across the nation as "mostly peaceful" demonstrations in recent weeks.

After 59 Days of Riots in Portland, ABC Claims 'Weeks' Since Protests Were Violence.  As NewsBusters has extensively documented, the broadcast newscasts have done everything they could to downplay and cover-up the extreme leftist violence at protests happening in cities across the country.  But during ABC's Good Morning America on Sunday [7/26/2020], the network, via correspondent Janai Norman, attempted some revisionist history, claiming it had been "weeks" since protests had turned violent.  Norman's lie came just as she was wrapping up her report, falsely telling viewers:  "And no one seriously injured in that shooting at that protest in Colorado.  But it's been weeks we have seen protests like these turn violent in multiple cities around the country, as we have this weekend."  Not only has it not been "weeks" since protests turned violent, but it also hasn't been "weeks" since there has been protest-linked violence in multiple cities at the same time.  While there has been violence in Portland for 59 days, last week saw riots in Seattle targeting local businesses, which the broadcast networks (ABC, CBS, and NBC) blacked out and hid from viewers.

Trump Was Right All Along:  The Fake News Media Really Is The Enemy Of The People.  Firework smoke still lingered in the sky over Mount Rushmore as journalists began their daily routine of story-spinning, as if their very lives depended on headlines reflecting the exact opposite of true events.  President Donald Trump's pro-America speech, dripping with unity and patriotism, was decried in legacy media as diabolical.  Just moments after the star-spangled spectacle, The New York Times blasted out a news alert, calling the president's remarks "dark and divisive" and condemning his Independence Day speech as insufficiently focused on the Wuhan virus.  ABC News claimed "Trump pushe[d] racial division" and defied pandemic rules, while the Washington Post opted for "dark" descriptors and blamed Trump for "exploit[ing] social divisions."  One honest look at Trump's speech spikes these media fictions into orbit.

The American Media Has Betrayed America.  There aren't enough disparaging epithets in the English language to adequately describe "journalists" such as ABC Nightly News anchorman David Muir, the dashing 40-something actor who pretends to share important national news with America.  Five days a week, Muir recites agenda-driven propaganda as if it were truth, while his allies who run the social media monopolies throttle down, demonetize, shadowban, or flat out censor reports that conflict with his narrative.  One of Muir's biggest crimes is his façade of objectivity.  Unlike the hosts of the cable news networks, such as CNN's rabid Don Lemon, or MSNBC's smirking Rachel Maddow, Muir isn't obvious.  He spreads his phony lies and distortions with a straight face, never breaking character.  If you aren't exposed to the other side of his stories, it works.

Fake News:  In the coronavirus crisis, the press covers itself in glory.  Media outlets have dished up nothing but one-sided criticism of President Trump and have now ended up serving us just fake news.  For example:  In mid-January, the experts at the WHO repeated Chinese propaganda that the virus wouldn't spread from human to human, and the press repeated that as if it were fact.  That was a lie.  Instead of excoriating China for its duplicity, all they say is that President Trump should have known.  Here's another:  On Jan. 31, Trump implemented a travel ban from China.  The mainstream press and its Democrat allies called that xenophobic, racist, and an overreaction.  Now the critics say he reacted too slowly.  Sometimes, the press goes full fake news, based on its urge to snipe at Trump.  ABC loudly ran a false story on Wednesday [4/8/2020], with no evidence, claiming that Trump was warned in November about the virus.  On Thursday, the network started to bury it quietly.

Pentagon issues rare public rebuke against ABC for claim White House was warned of pandemic in November.  The Pentagon issued a rare public rebuke of a report claiming it warned the White House of the coronavirus pandemic back in November.  A branch of the Pentagon's Defense Intelligence Agency debunked a claim made in a report by ABC News which alleged that "concerns about what is now known to be the novel coronavirus pandemic were detailed in a November intelligence report."  The National Center for Medical Intelligence refuted the claim in a statement Wednesday [4/8/2020], asserting that the report does not even exist.

ABC Chief Global Affairs Correspondent Seems Sad That Iranians Protest Against Regime.  On Monday, ABC's chief global affairs correspondent Martha Raddatz issued a report on the current protests against the Iranian despotic regime on Monday, and while doing so, colored her language to indicate that after the U.S. killed Iranian general Qassem Soleimani, the country was united, but now that protesters against the government have expressed their outrage, the country's "unity" has been "shattered."

The disastrous fires in Australia are man-caused, but they're not climate change.  ABC made a laughingstock out of itself with a map superimposing Australia across the United States, implying that an area equal to 25% of America was on fire, even as ABC acknowledged that the fire was, in fact, only as big as Maryland.  Unsurprisingly, Hollywood and the media are wrong.  Nothing unusual is happening with Australia's climate.  The only unusual thing is that environmentalists have prevented remediation and arsonists have had fun.

ABC News posts 'blatantly incorrect' transcript of portion of Hunter Biden interview.  ABC News landed that big exclusive interview with Hunter Biden, in which Biden admitted that he had in fact spoken with his father about the job on the Burisma board and also acknowledged that yeah, he's probably benefited quite a bit from being Joe Biden's son.  Thing is, it's not entirely clear that ABC was paying attention to the interview.  As the Washington Free Beacon's Brent Scher notes, their transcript doesn't line up with the video:  [Video clip]

ABC: False Footage And Fake News.  In a stunning new low for a dominant media that has forfeited all credibility with the American people, ABC News has been caught in the act trying to pass off video from a show at a Kentucky gun range as gripping footage of a Turkish attack on Kurdish forces in northern Syria. [...] The video was meant to support an ongoing ABC News narrative that President Trump has "betrayed" staunch US allies, handing them over to certain slaughter, by deciding to pull American troops out of another potentially endless war in Syria. [...] As many news outlets have reported, the video is obviously cropped to edit out any identifiable signs that it came from the gun show.

Trump Smacks Down ABC News for 'Fake News' Footage of Syria.  President Donald Trump rebuked ABC News' Jonathan Karl publicly during a press conference Wednesday [10/16/2019] for the network's claim that footage from a Kentucky gun range was in fact footage of Turkey bombing Kurds in Syria. [...] Trump was referring to a story that ABC News ran on Sunday and Monday in which it claimed that t had obtained video footage showing the war in Syria.

Trump: ABC News Airing Fake Syria Bombing Video is a 'Real Disgrace'.  President Donald Trump on Monday evening hammered ABC News for airing a video that purportedly showed a recent Turkish military operation against Kurdish civilians in northern Syria, which actually appears to have been filmed at a Kentucky gun range in 2017.

ABC News 'slaughter in Syria' footage appears to come from a Kentucky gun range.  Are you distrustful of the coverage of what is happening now in northern Syria between the Kurds and the Turkish army?  You have good reason to be.  ABC aired supposedly shocking footage Monday [10/14/2019] and Sunday purporting to be from the frontline battle between the Syrian Kurds and the invading Turks.  The only problem is, the footage appears to come from a nighttime machine gun demonstration at the Knob Creek Gun Range in West Point, Kentucky.  After seeing a comment from Twitter user Wojciech Pawelczyk, I began making some calls.  As of this writing, it appears ABC indeed aired footage recorded in the Bluegrass State and claimed it was from Syria.  The network has since pulled the video.

ABC Reports About Biden's "Overflow Crowd" of About 30 People at New Hampshire Event.  About 30 supporters of Joe Biden gathered at the Portland Pie Co.  Stuffed in a small room with six tables, munching on several types of pizza, campaign members discussed Biden's qualities with interested voters.  Still the mainstream media refuse to concede that Liberals can get people on their rally.  It seems that Biden's rally in New Hampshire itself was a huge disaster.  Still ABC news wanted to report about some sort of "Overflow Crowd".  ABC posted video of the "overflow crowd" at the event — there were a few dozen people in the room and most were probably media.

Who Really Believes Biden Can Beat Trump?  According to a new Washington Post-ABC poll, however, if the 2020 election were held today, Biden would beat President Trump by 10 points.  If this inspires skepticism, it won't be ameliorated by the finding in the same survey that Trump's approval rating is at the highest point of his presidency.  The new poll found that 47 percent of registered voters say they approve of Trump compared to 42 percent in April.  Meanwhile, Biden's lead among the contenders for the Democratic presidential nomination is dwindling.

'It's complete fiction': US Defense Secretary Mattis says an 'exclusive' ABC News report about American plans to bomb Iran was made up.  US Defense Secretary General James Mattis has dismissed as 'fiction' an Australian media report claiming American forces were prepared to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities as early as next month.  A bewildered Mattis was quizzed by US reporters in Washington DC on Friday [7/27/2018] about the ABC report.  The 'exclusive' report quoted unnamed senior Australian government figures and claimed Australian defence facilities would likely play a role in identifying targets in Iran.

ABC News false report about Manafort
ABC Fake News:  "Manafort Pleads Guilty To Five Charges of Manslaughter".  Earlier today [6/20/2018] ABC News broadcast a fake news banner claiming Paul Manafort pleads guilty to five charges of manslaughter.


Fake Truth.  Last week, ABC News erroneously reported that Michael Flynn, in a supposed new role of cooperation with the prosecution, was prepared to testify that Trump, while still a candidate, ordered him improperly to contact (and, by inference, to collude with) Russian government officials.  For a while, the startling news sent the stock market into a fall of over 300 points.  Was the purported pro-business Trump agenda shortly to be derailed by "proof" of a possible impeachable offense?  A little while later, however, ABC was forced to retract that story, to suspend Brian Ross (the reporter involved), and to offer a correction that Trump actually had been president-elect at the time of the contact and completely within his elected purview to reach out to foreign governments.

Brian Ross Should Be Fired.  It's a classic journalistic mistake to try and be first to report something before it's verified.  But in the Trump era, when liberals believe the president is a uniquely dangerous threat to America — and even the world — any news that could lead to speculation about Trump's impeachment or resignation is like catnip.  Journalists are prone to overhype anything that could spell "The End."  This suspension might have been an adequate punishment ... if Ross hadn't already made a long line of whoppers.

Brian Ross's Jackknife on the Information Superhighway.  The advertised rage among executives at ABC is hard to take seriously.  Ross, after all, has long been paid by them to slap together politically useful smears.  They are just upset that he got caught on this one.  Were they not in an optics war with Trump, they wouldn't have punished him at all.  To understand the hackish and biased culture at ABC from which a rodent like Ross emerged, all one has to do is watch the hysterically jubilant treatment The View gave his "breaking news."  That moment deserves a special place in the annals of media jackassery.  A producer, in mid-show, momentously brought the report out to its cackling host Joy Behar, who read it like a telegram announcing the end of World War II.  After she tremulously read the report aloud, she threw it up in the air like confetti as the other panelists hooted with delight.

The Editor says...
ABC News is not on the Information Superhighway.  ABC News is part of the old business-route highway that stops every two minutes for advertising, and only delivers news at a pace determined by ABC News, not by you.  The Information Superhighway bypasses ABC News, for the most part, enabling you to find as much information in five minutes as ABC News dribbles out in a day.

ABC's Brian Ross again under fire for explosive error on Trump, Flynn.  ABC's famously error-prone chief investigative correspondent, Brian Ross was at it again on Friday when the network was forced to issue an embarrassing correction when Ross botched a bombshell "exclusive" about retired general Michael Flynn.  An ABC spokesperson declined to comment on whether Ross will be disciplined.  He has not been sanctioned for past errors.  Ross's report, delivered live to ABC stations during a "special report" on Friday, said that Flynn would testify that Donald Trump had ordered him to make contact with Russians about foreign policy while he was still a candidate — which raised the specter of impeachment and sent the Dow careening down.

ABC News suspends Brian Ross for 4 weeks over erroneous Flynn story.  ABC News announced Saturday [12/2/2017] that it has suspended investigative reporter Brian Ross for four weeks without pay after Ross was forced to correct a bombshell on-air report about Michael Flynn.  "We deeply regret and apologize for the serious error we made yesterday.  The reporting conveyed by Brian Ross during the special report had not been fully vetted through our editorial standards process," ABC said in a statement.

ABC News corrects bombshell Flynn report.  ABC News on Friday evening [12/1/2017] corrected an explosive special report that aired in the morning saying that Donald Trump, as a candidate for president, had asked Michael Flynn to make contact with Russians.  During "World News Tonight," ABC News investigative reporter Brian Ross said the source who had provided the initial information for his story later told him that it was as president-elect, not as a candidate, that Trump asked Flynn to contact the Russians.

Flashback: Brian Ross Had To Apologize For Report Suggesting Mass Shooter Was Tea Party Member.  ABC News' Brian Ross made a serious error in reporting on Friday [12/1/2017] when he claimed that Michael Flynn was set to testify that then-candidate Donald Trump told him to contact Russian officials.  After waiting the entire day, ABC News issued a major retraction on the report as it was discovered that is was not in fact candidate Donald Trump who told Flynn to contact Russian officials but president-elect Trump that instructed him to do so.  ABC News significantly downplayed the serious mistake in reporting, calling the retraction merely a "clarification."

ABC's Brian Ross Entirely Misleads All Media on Flynn Story — ABC Desperately Backtracks.  You might remember ABC's Brian Ross for previously making the absurd on-air claim that Colorado mass shooter James Holmes was a Tea Party member.  He completely made up the story, and later apologized.  Well, today [12/1/2017] ABC News Brian Ross again appeared directly on ABC World News to break a story claiming that candidate Donald Trump told campaign adviser Michael Flynn to make contact with Russians.

ABC News:  Christians who defend religious liberty are 'hate group'.  Alliance Defending Freedom is demanding a retraction and apology from ABC News after reporters smeared one of the nation's most respected religious liberty law firms as a 'hate group.'  ABC News reporters Pete Madden and Erin Galloway wrote a scathing report on a speech Attorney General Jeff Sessions delivered behind closed doors at the Summit on Religious Liberty at the Ritz-Carlton in Dana Point, California.

ABC/Disney Co.  Settles $1.9 Billion BPI Defamation Lawsuit — "Pink Slime" Case.  The civil trial began June 5th and ABC legal executives must have see the writing on the wall as the initial $1.9 billion in damages could have potentially tripled under South Dakota law (treble damages) to $5.7 billion if they allowed the three week trial to continue.  The actual defamation settlement is undisclosed.  However, at the point of settlement all reasonable assumptions must be that BPI was well positioned to win far more than the initially demanded settlement amount of $1.9 billion.

ABC Reaches Settlement in 'Pink Slime' Suit.  ABC said it reached a settlement in a closely scrutinized lawsuit filed against it by a South Dakota meat producer over ABC News reports that led to critics labeling one of the company's products "pink slime." [...] Financial terms of the settlement could not be immediately learned.

Hardly Walt's Disney.  [Y]ou may remember a series of reports in March of 2012 that aired on ABC, "World News Tonight" about a meat company called Beef Products Inc (BPI).  The company was a vendor for restaurants such as McDonald's, Taco Bell, and Burger King.  The story prominently featured "pink slime".  In fact, the reporter said, "pink slime" over 350 times during the reporting.  The reporter was referring to what the ground beef looked like during a cleaning process of the meat.  It is completely legal and sanitary.  As you can imagine, the story did not look good for BPI or its customers.  Because of the stories, BPI lost customers, and revenue decreased by 80 percent.  The company was also forced to close 75 percent of their processing plants.  There's only one problem.  It might not have even been true.  As a result, BPI decided to take action and sue ABC and Disney for defamation.  Disney countered with "freedom of the press" and "freedom of speech" in the First Amendment.  It doesn't appear be going the way Disney wants.  The lawsuit has moved forward and opening statements began this past Monday [6/12/2017] in South Dakota.  The case has the potential to be the largest defamation case in U.S. history, worth an estimated $5.7 billion.

ABC's Photoshop Fail:  Creates Fake Image to Promote Trump Interview.  After being caught deceptively editing comments from former White House press secretary Ari Fleischer during a report on Monday's [1/23/2017] Nightline, on Wednesday, ABC News was again embroiled in a fake news controversy after the network used a badly photoshopped image to promote World News Tonight anchor David Muir's upcoming interview with President Trump.  The picture showed Trump looking out the window of the Oval Office in a pretty standard pose, however, outside that window there appeared to be a massive blizzard.  The only problem?  It hasn't snowed in Washington D.C. in weeks and certainly no storm that intense has hit the area so far this winter.  In fact, the weather on Wednesday was unseasonably warm — sunny and 60 degrees.

ABC Apologizes After Being Caught Deceptively Editing Quote About Sean Spicer.  ABC News apologized late Tuesday [1/24/2017] after being caught deceptively editing a quote from former George W. Bush press secretary Ari Fleischer during the Monday night edition of Nightline.  ABC edited Fleischer's words to make it look like he was being more critical of White House press secretary Sean Spicer in the taped interview than he actually was.  Nightline quoted Fleischer as saying, "[Spicer's] briefing made me uncomfortable.  It was too truculent, too tough.  It looks as if the ball was dropped on Saturday."  But that is not what Fleischer meant to convey at all.  The point he was trying to make was actually complimentary of Spicer.

No, The Public Doesn't Suddenly Support Socialized Medicine.  A new Gallup survey seems to suggest that majority of Americans now back government-run health care. [...] The mainstream press eagerly ran with the story.  The Washington Post, for example, headlined its piece:  "Poll:  Most Americans want to replace ObamaCare with single-payer — including many Republicans."  The ABC News headline blared "Poll Says Majority of Americans Prefer 'Medicare For All' Health Care," and the story led by saying that "A growing number of Americans now support the idea of federally funded health care."  Look more carefully at the poll itself, however, and you see that it doesn't show that at all.

Is 'The View' the Dumbest Show on TV?  This week, "The View" discussed the death of Fidel Castro.  You can practically predict where this is going without watching a single frame:
  •   Unabashed Obama defense
  •   A clear lack of knowledge on the subject
  •   Turning the death of a dictator into a Trump-bashing session.
If you guessed all three ... congratulations!  The show's hosts mostly defended President Obama's toothless statement concerning Castro's death, one that didn't dare mention any of the vile truths of his reign.

Report: Caitlyn Jenner's camp pitched ESPY award in exchange for PR plugs.  ESPN's annual ESPY Awards show generally comes and goes with little controversy.  Until this year, that is.  [Bruce "Caitlyn"] Jenner, the former Olympic champion decathlete, will be awarded the Arthur Ashe Courage Award at Wednesday night's event which will be televised on ABC.  Abby Wambach, a member of the U.S. women's national soccer team that just won the World Cup, will present Jenner with the award.  According to a new report, Jenner's ESPY award originated as a pitch from her representatives to ESPN.  Per RadarOnline, Jenner's camp suggested to the network that she receive the award and offered public relations plugs on her upcoming reality show in return.

Revealed: Caitlyn Jenner's reps 'demanded ESPYs award in exchange for PR plugs and Diane Sawyer interview'.  Representatives of Caitlyn Jenner reportedly negotiated her ESPYs award in exchange for PR plugs in her upcoming TV series and threatened to pull out of her 20/20 interview.  Reports have emerged that Jenner's team approached ESPN with the idea that she win the Arthur Ashe Courage Award just as details were being finalized for her 20/20 interview with Diane Sawyer on ABC.  ABC and ESPN are both owned by Disney, and ABC aired Wednesday's [7/15/2015] awards ceremony.

Weasel words from a weasel.  When [George] Stephanopoulos's contributions to the Clinton Foundation were discovered by the Free Beacon's Andrew Stiles and leaked by Stephanopoulos, or on his behalf by ABC public relations, to Politico, Stephanopoulos prepared a statement that amounted to old-fashioned damage control. [...] Stephanopoulos wraps his statement in a profession of his great generosity, of which the Clinton Foundation was coincidentally an additional beneficiary.  He made the donations over the past three years only to support worthy causes:  to heal the sick, protect the weak and feed the starving.  Make room for the apostle George.

Did Stephanopoulos go wrong? Of course he did.  "[W]hen those donors give that money," ABC host and commentator George Stephanopoulos said to Jon Stewart last month, "there's a hope that that's going to lead to something."  Stephanopoulos was impugning (or perhaps more accurately, describing) the motives of many people who had given money to the now-very-controversial Clinton Foundation.  He failed to mention that he himself had given $75,000 — a fact he was forced to admit last week after Andrew Stiles of the Washington Free Beacon began asking questions about it.

What Stephanopoulos Still Hasn't Disclosed.  The common denominator in what Stephanopoulos still hasn't disclosed is the fact that Stephanopoulos didn't just give the Clinton Foundation money, he gave it his time.  Schweizer notes that time is the one thing news media personalities have very little of.  In Stephanopoulos' case there's a second thing:  integrity.

George Stephanopoulos has forfeited all trust as a newsman.  Dan Rather of CBS was toppled by a phony document scam.  Lyin' Brian Williams at NBC casually mixed fact with self-aggrandizing fiction.  Now George Stephanopoulos is caught in a Clinton web of deceit at ABC.  The hat trick of arrogant anchor scandals helps explain why Americans don't trust network news.  With apologies to Walter Cronkite, that's the way it is, and the way it is stinks.  Stephanopoulos shares with Rather and Williams the rotten distinction of fessing up only after being exposed by real journalists.

ABC Apologizes for Story That Connected Mozilla CEO to Hateful Westboro Baptist.  ABC News Vice President Jeffrey Schneider has apologized for a story on his network that connected a CEO who supports traditional marriage to the Westboro Baptist Church and their offensive [...] signs.  Mr. Schneider contacted the Media Research Center on Thursday after our social media department requested members call and complain about the comparison.

$1.2 billion examples of ABC News' bias.  The slimiest news coverage of 2012 has nothing to do with the presidential election.  It concerns a massive ABC News campaign against an American beef company.  Led by national correspondent Jim Avila, the network bombarded a South Dakota firm with a seemingly endless barrage of stories claiming that its lean beef was — it doesn't get uglier than this — "pink slime."  According to that company, ABC's reports cost it hundreds of millions of dollars, and cost more than 700 people their jobs.  Now that company is suing ABC — for $1.2 billion.

This is what passes for journalism these days:
ABC Fakes Muslim Prejudice, Unsurprisingly Finds 'Islamophobia' in America.  Apparently to prove that the US is filled with Muslim hating yahoos, ABC went on the hunt to find "Islamophobia" in America and the result is "Witness to Discrimination:  What Would You Do?"  Since they didn't really know where to find any, ABC News decided to create their own prejudice against Muslims by hiring an actress to put on Muslim dress and get "confronted" by a Muslim hating coffee store server — also an actor hired by ABC.


CBS

Related topic: The CBS Memo Controversy of September 2004.


Revoke the media's License to Lie.  Fox News reported, "60 Minutes reporter Lesley Stahl admits worry about future of legacy media: 'I'm very dark about it.'"  The story covered a taped chit-chat between her and Peggy Noonan in which the two dinosaurs bemoaned the tarpit they were sinking in.  The Tyrannosaurus Reginas blamed Trump and Elon Musk. [...] Stahl said, "We're talking about something so essential that you don't want to say, 'Well, we'll see.'  Or maybe, 'The world will end, we'll see.'  But if America lost freedom of the press and freedom of speech, it would be the beginning of losing everything.'"  Where was she when Twitter banned Trump for life?  Where was her ringing defense of free speech?  Where now is her stirring cry to release the January 6 protesters just as the Capitol Police have done with every liberal protester?  Freedom of the press has never been more secure than it is today.  There is not a single newspaper that is censored.

CBS News urges you to 'combat climate change' by 'leaving the leaves' in your yard instead of raking & sending to landfills.  CBS News anchor:  Leave the leaves this fall.  CBS News New York's Vanessa Murdock covers climate and explains why letting leaves lie is good for your yard and the environment.  CBS News reporter Vanessa Murdock: "According to (David Mizejewski — naturalist, National Wildlife Federation), leaving the leaves can also help combat climate change. it takes them out of landfills."  David Mizejewski — naturalist, National Wildlife Federation: "Underground with no oxygen, they break down and produce methane, which is 25 times more potent as a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide is."

The Editor says...
Rotting leaves are not unique to residential yards.  All the forests in the world have leaves on the ground, and they will inevitably get wet and decay and emit byproducts into the atmosphere.  Whatever actions you take in your little fraction of an acre will have no effect at all on the climate.  You aren't going to save the earth by abstaining from raking leaves.

Trump Sues CBS Over Edited Harris '60 Minutes' Interview.  Former President Donald Trump filed a lawsuit against CBS today, accusing the network of "election and voter interference."  "This action concerns CBS's partisan and unlawful acts of election and voter interference through malicious, deceptive, and substantial news distortion calculated to (a) confuse, deceive, and mislead the public, and (b) attempt to tip the scales in favor of the Democratic Party as the heated 2024 Presidential Election — which President Trump is leading — approaches its conclusion," wrote Trump's lawyers.  The lawsuit, which was first reported by Fox News, is over an interview Vice President Kamala Harris did with "60 Minutes."  "CBS and its 60 Minutes producers intentionally misled the public by broadcasting and posting a carefully, deceptively edited Interview and transcript while opting to release other portions online.  Such manipulative editing aimed to confuse the electorate regarding Kamala's lack of abilities, intelligence, and appeal," Trump's lawyers wrote.  In the lawsuit, which was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Trump demands at least $10 billion in damages and a jury trial.

Trump sues CBS for $10B over Harris's '60 Minutes' interview.  Former President Trump is suing CBS News over a "60 Minutes" interview it broadcast with Vice President Harris earlier this month that he and his allies have claimed was edited to cast her in a positive light.  The lawsuit, which seeks $10 billion in damages and was filed Thursday [10/31/2024] in U.S. District Court in the Northern District of Texas alleges the network engaged in "partisan and unlawful acts of election and voter interference through malicious, deceptive, and substantial news distortion."  "To paper over Kamala's 'word salad' weakness, CBS used its national platform on 60 Minutes to cross the line from the exercise of judgment in reporting to deceitful, deceptive manipulation of news," the lawsuit reads.  In a statement to The Hill late Thursday, a spokesperson for the network said the former president's "repeated claims against 60 Minutes are false."

What Is CBS News Hiding?  As we recently outlined, it has been a damaging, credibility-harming few weeks for CBS News.  The network violated its own debate rules with a disputed-to-misleading 'fact check' of JD Vance at the Vice Presidential debate, then cut off his microphone as he calmly picked apart their assertion.  Their morning show was thrown into chaos when some employees melted down over an anchor asking pointed, tough questions of an anti-Israel zealot, resulting in angry recriminations, tears, and a series of embarrassing leaks.  Then there was the curious 60 Minutes edit of Kamala Harris' answer regarding US-Israeli relations, which looked completely different in a teaser clip, compared to what aired on the broadcast itself.

'60 Minutes' Has Tortured Republicans for Decades.  Everyone can see the divergence between the Harris word salad that appeared in a promo on "Face the Nation" and the shorter, more coherent answer on their election special.  But they refuse to release a transcript to explain themselves.  It's always maddening when the arrogant journalists who claim they hold government accountable refuse to be accountable.  Nobody in TV news has been more overpraised than "60 Minutes."  This horde of urbane leftist snobs has concocted syrupy minutes for Democrats (especially Barack Obama) and salty minutes for Republicans (especially Trump).  Four years ago at this time, Lesley Stahl's interview with Trump was so hostile, the transcript is a long list of interrupted answers.  Right from the beginning, Stahl asked, "Are you ready for some tough questions?"  She asked that four times.  Trump couldn't even finish sentences.  Stahl lectured him that the Hunter Biden laptop was unverified.  "You know, this is '60 Minutes.' And we can't put on things we can't verify."  That needed a laugh track.

With Kamala Harris edit, CBS has gone full 'fake news' — GOP, time to boycott.  CBS has shown its true colors. [...] For years, I've watched this network go from slanted reporting to straight-up propaganda, and now to sheer deceit.  The past month has shown that Republicans should have nothing to do with it — and that former President Donald Trump is right to call attention to its chicanery with a threat of legal action. [...] The final straw came Sunday, when the network finally released a statement about its "60 Minutes" interview with Kamala Harris, stemming from its Oct. 6 release of a teaser that showed her nonsensical answer to a question on Israel.  Social media erupted at this typical Harris word-salad exercise — but in the actual "60 Minutes" interview that aired a day later, Harris miraculously had a completely different answer.  Did CBS perform a selective edit to do crisis control on Harris' behalf?  Instead of explaining the discrepancy, two weeks later CBS blamed — Donald Trump.  He had called the interview "deceptively edited," to which CBS answered, "That is false."  Their answer itself is a lie.  The interview was edited.

A Media Beyond Caricature.  CBS's iconic 60 Minutes has had plenty of scandals and embarrassments in its long 57-year history, most notably the fake-but-accurate Dan Rather mess.  Yet never has it found itself in greater disrepute than in 2024.  [Advertisement]  Donald Trump, for good reason, recently declined to join 60 Minutes for its traditional election-year in-depth interviews of the two presidential candidates.  Why?  [The same advertisement again.]  [Yet another advertisement.]  Last time he consented in 2020, anchor and interviewer Leslie Stahl attacked Trump's accurate assertion that the Hunter Biden laptop (then in the possession of the FBI) was authentic — and authentically damning to Joe Biden's presidential candidacy.  Stahl falsely claimed the laptop "can't be verified."  She further incorrectly asserted, "So this story about Hunter and his laptop, some repair shop found it; the source is Steve Bannon and Rudy Giuliani."  The New York Post, in fact, reported the story.  The FBI did not deny it.  [Advertisement]  Yet old Twitter and Facebook, under collaborating FBI tutelage and pressure, suppressed dissemination of the truth.

Facing FCC Investigation CBS Finally Responds to Accusations of News Manipulation.  The FCC is investigating CBS for blatant manipulation of news.  CBS really has no defense.  CBS has been caught producing, via editorial manipulation, two entirely different responses to the same question.  Everyone has been asking CBS to just simply release the full transcript.  CBS has refused.  The assumption is now about the manipulative content of the broadcast being so extreme that to release a transcript would be even worse than what is already known.  The FCC complaint is simple and accurate, which is likely why CBS has never attempted to defend itself, until today.

CBS named in federal complaint over its decision to make Harris look coherent.  CBS has been named in a federal complaint for its decision to make Kamala Harris look coherent following its taping of a recent interview.  To do that, the network recorded an answer she made early in the recording, then subbed it in for the word salad she actually delivered to a later question.  Fox News said the complaint accused CBS News of "significant and intentional news distortion."  The filing was from the Center for American Rights and was submitted to the Federal Communications Commission.

Does CBS News Even Think Before Publishing Such Patently False Drivel?  How thick is the bubble that covers liberal America?  It's a legitimate question after this heinously foolish piece about Donald Trump's proposal on car loans was announced: the former president wants to make the interest tax-deductible.  CBS News alleges that the so-called experts say such a tweak will only benefit the rich. [...] The great thing about this story is that it's facially untrue.  The experts are wrong — they have been for quite some time — and until they stop acting like Democratic Party operatives, ignore what they have to say.  From tax policy to COVID, the experts were wrong — the best way to give them a choleric temper is to ignore them.  Then, do it more because the rich don't take out car loans.

How a scandal engulfing 60 Minutes exposed the Kamala media cover-up.  The scandal engulfing CBS' 60 Minutes over its edited interview with Kamala Harris has turbocharged fears that the Democrat is being shepherded into the White House by a liberal media increasingly desperate to cover for her shortcomings.  The presidential race has been dogged by allegations of media bias since the moment Harris unseated Joe Biden as the Democrat pick in the wake of his disastrous debate with Donald Trump in June.  Apart from glowing magazine profiles and softball interviews with handpicked reporters, the VP has largely side-stepped the media exposure that candidates traditionally allow.

Calls for CBS to Release the Kamala Interview Transcript Grow Deafening As Their Reputation Burns.  We've seen so much malpractice from the corrupt media, especially since Donald Trump descended that golden escalator in 2015, that it's hard to be surprised anymore.  We've seen them bury the Hunter Biden laptop story right before an election, we saw them prattle on for years about a fake Russia Collusion narrative, and witnessed them lie endlessly about Joe Biden's obvious mental decline.  Still, CBS' deceptive editing of Kamala Harris' "60 Minutes" interview marks yet another low.  As we reported, they issued two separate clips showing Kamala answering a question from interviewer Bill Whitaker — but her answer is different in each one.  Clearly, then, one of those edits is a lie.  The network, which Dan Rather already humiliated back in 2004 when he accused then-President Bush of illicitly conspiring to avoid the Vietnam War but could only back up his claim with documents that appeared to be obvious forgeries, is taking immense heat from all sides for their duplicitous edits.  One common refrain:  come clean and release the transcripts.

'60 Minutes' Editing Kamala Harris Is the Ultimate Deep Fake.  Kamala Harris, the Democratic nominee for president, sat down for a taped interview with CBS' Bill Whitaker for 60 Minutes which aired Monday night.  The network then released what is called "teaser" clips consisting of elements from the interview before it aired that evening, one of which aired on CBS' "Face the Nation."  In that clip, when Whitaker asked her why Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu "isn't listening" to the administration, Harris delivered one of her typical word salads, a nervous mashup of words that led to no real meaning or clarity saying, "Well Bill, the work that we have done has resulted in a number of movements in that region by Israel that were very much prompted by, or a result of, many things, including our advocacy for what needs to happen in the region."  But apparently, the folks at CBS aren't into word salad, so they changed it.  When the program aired on Monday night, Whitaker asked the question, but this time Kamala's answer was different:  "We are not going to stop pursuing what is necessary for the United States to be clear about where we stand on the need for this war to end."  More concise, more understandable, and maybe even presidential.  But that's not the answer she gave in the earlier clip.  Many have noted that CBS replaced her gibberish with a comment given earlier in the interview.  Like an old-fashioned cut-and-paste job, but without the glue stick.  Multiple outlets have reached out to CBS asking for an explanation for the creative editing which changes the response of a presidential candidate to a national security question.

Former CBS staffers call for 'outside investigation' into '60 Minutes' controversy: 'There's a problem here'.  Former CBS News staffers are reportedly calling on the network to launch an external probe into the ongoing "60 Minutes" editing controversy.  CBS News has been at the center of outrage after it aired an edited clip of Vice President Kamala Harris during its primetime "60 Minutes" election special Monday that was different from a preview of the unflattering exchange she had with veteran correspondent Bill Whitaker that was widely panned by critics.  "I think there should be an outside investigation," a former CBS News journalist told The New York Post on Thursday.  "Obviously, there's a problem here.  If they care about journalistic integrity, they would conduct an investigation or release the full transcript," the ex-CBS journalist added.

Catherine Herridge Spills the Tea on CBS Over Kamala Interview Editing Scandal.  Kamala Harris was hoping to move the needle with her media tour.  She may have moved the needle alright, but in the wrong direction for her.  She seems to be completely imploding along with her knuckle-headed running mate, Tim Walz.  Interviews with friendly outlets are supposed to help prop you up.  But her interview with "The View" just decimated her and her interview with "60 Minutes" has evolved into a full-blown scandal.  Bill Whitaker actually did a good job of asking some probing questions, and Kamala gave some ridiculous answers, including one incredible word salad about Israel and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.  They released a clip on it early, but then when they did the whole interview on Monday, the answer had changed and been edited.  [Tweet]

CBS Embroiled in 'Huge Journalistic Scandal' After Major Change to Kamala Harris' '60 Minutes' Answer Is Spotted.  Every honest American knows that the establishment media lies on behalf of powerful people.  Thus, when we point out instances of dishonesty, it often feels as if we do little more than multiply examples.  Sometimes, however, those examples prove so egregious that, no matter how familiar they seem, and no matter how exhausted the years of similar and repeated outrages have made us feel, their sheer brazenness still manages to shock us.  Tuesday on the social media platform X, an observant video editor named "MAZE" noticed that someone at CBS News appeared to have removed one of Vice President Kamala Harris' most jaw-droppingly incoherent answers from her recent "60 Minutes" interview then replaced it with an altogether different answer — an apparent cut-and-paste editing job that one X user described as "a huge journalistic scandal."

Trump cries foul over 60 Minutes edit of Kamala sit down: 'Must be investigated'.  Former President Trump cried foul and demanded an investigation following accusations that "60 Minutes" allegedly edited an answer from Vice President Kamala Harris given during another softball, propagandic interview.  Harris spoke with "60 Minutes" correspondent Bill Whitaker during a pre-taped session in what CBS News has referred to as a traditional interview with presidential candidates.  It would seem that the traditional interview referred to included selective editing that was meant to put Harris in a more favorable political light.  That's hardly objective journalism.  The propaganda piece aired on Monday.  Trump claims he never agreed to an interview on the show and was bashed by host Scott Pelley for it who claimed he backed out of the sitdown.  Trump hammered the producers of the program and accused them of being guilty of a "major Campaign Finance Violation."

Trump Demands Investigation After 60 Minutes Edits Out Kamala's Word Salad Answers.  Former President Donald Trump on Tuesday demanded an investigation into the 60 Minutes interview of Kamala Harris, insisting that the long running news program repeatedly "sliced and diced" her answers to make her seem "more presidential."  [Advertisement]  The Trump-Vance Campaign on Monday demanded that CBS News release an "unedited transcript" of the entire "60 Minutes" interview after her particularly bad "word salad" answer about Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was cut from Monday's broadcast and replaced with a completely different answer.  [The same advertisement again]  [Unrelated video clip]  In a preview clip on Sunday, "60 Minutes" correspondent Bill Whitaker told Harris that "it seems that Prime Minister Netanyahu is not listening."  The Democrat presidential nominee answered, "Well, Bill ... the work that we have done has resulted in a number of movements in that region by Israel that were very much prompted by or a result of many things, including our advocacy for what needs to happen in the region."  [Advertisement]  That incoherent word salad was one of several botched answers that went viral on social media following the trainwreck interview.

Fake News '60 Minutes' Caught Editing Kamala's Nonsensical Answer with Previous Soundbite to Make Her Sound Coherent and Normal.  This is the definition of election interference.  Apparently, Kamala's interview with 60 Minutes was much worse than we first thought.  Fake news 60 Minutes was caught editing Kamala's answers to make her sound coherent and normal.  In fact it was so bad that '60 Minutes' spliced her nonsensical answer and replaced it with a completely separate sentence she said earlier in the interview. [...] Mixing and matching questions and answers.  This isn't journalism.  It's fraud.

60 Minutes Edits Kamala Harris Interview to Remove Her Jibberish and Completely Change Answers to Questions.  I was initially wondering why it took CBS 60-Minutes over 36 hours to upload the full interview to their YouTube account.  Now things make sense.  CBS 60-Minutes not only edited the interview, but they also completely erased parts of the interview and structurally moved answers to questions in an intentional effort to assist the Harris campaign.  In essence, CBS completely changed the interview.  CBS didn't just shape or modify the interview; they literally moved answers to questions.  A Twitter user named @Mazemore was the first to notice one big substantial edit that completely manufacturers a different question and answer.  "The edited version that CBS put on YouTube is a work of art.  Mix and match questions and answers."  This is unreal journalistic manipulation.

CBS News' Fake Kamala Interview Is Deliberate Disinformation Meant To Sway Voters.  On Sunday, CBS News aired a clip of Vice President Kamala Harris stumbling through an answer to Bill Whitaker about why some foreign leaders disregard the Biden-Harris administration.  "We supply Israel with billions of dollars in military aid and yet Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu seems to be charting his own course," Whitaker said.  "The Biden-Harris administration has pressed him to agree to a ceasefire; he's resisted.  You urged him not to go into Lebanon; he went in anyway.  He has promised to make Iran pay for the missile attack, and that has the potential of expanding the war.  Does the U.S. have no sway over Prime Minister Netanyahu?" It was one of the more difficult questions Harris has had to face over the past several weeks, answering for why her administration is seen as weak and ineffective on the world stage.  When Whitaker doubled down on his question after Harris tried to avoid it with her initial answer, as expected, Harris tossed up a word salad.  "Well, Bill, the work that we have done has resulted in a number of movements in that region by Israel that were very much prompted by, or a result of, many things, including our advocacy for what needs to happen in the region."  Harris said during the version that appeared on Sunday's "Face the Nation."  Roughly 24 hours later, CBS News aired a different version of Harris' answer.

The Editor says...
Maybe the managers at CBS think the viewers are really stupid.  Maybe they think "60 Minutes" viewers only watch TV on Sundays.  Maybe they think the internet hasn't been invented yet.  Maybe they are all rabid socialist Democrats who just don't care what viewers catch them doing.  What could possibly lead them to believe that nobody would notice a stealth edit on a Harris interview, just one month before the election?

Were the CBS Moderators Instructed to Affirm Climate Alarmist Talking Points?  [Scroll down]  The moderators, or CBS, immediately showed their bias.  After an opening question about Israel and Iran, a perfectly logical lead-in topic as missiles were literally raining down on Israel as the debate got underway, climate change was the second question offered, before the economy and illegal immigration, despite it ranking dead last or near the bottom in polls of voters as an issue of concern.  Climate change ranks far below inflation, health care, education, crime, and illegal immigration in every poll taken.  But because it is a liberal cause célèbre, it matters more to the left-leaning media than issues more important to voters.  Thus, its prominence in CBS' moderators questioning and their behavior after.  In the wake of Hurricane Helene, O'Donnell framed a question about climate change by asserting that climate change makes hurricanes "larger, stronger, and more deadly because of the historic rainfall."  The data demonstrate that this is false, of course, but her handlers felt the need to make sure she used the tragedy to apply pressure on the Republican vice presidential candidate and emotionally charge the question.

'Fact check' has become just another word for censorship.  At the vice presidential debate this week, the CBS moderators once again tried to show that they were the fair and impartial people in the room[.]  Except that — as with the Trump-Harris debate — they only seemed interested in fact-checking in one direction.  Against the Republican.  On Tuesday night the subject of Springfield, Ohio, once again came up.  And once again Springfield revealed one of the big problems of this media era.  CBS's Margaret Brennan decided to fact check something that JD Vance said and immediately relayed a piece of false information herself.  Following Vance's point about the number of illegal migrants Brennan announced authoritatively that Springfield does in fact have "a large number of Haitian migrants" but that they have "legal status [and] Temporary Protected Status."  It was then down to Vance to fact-check the fact-checker by pointing out — correctly — that what Brennan had just described was actually a "pathway" opened up by Kamala Harris explicitly to fudge the true levels of illegal immigration.

Walz 'Misspeaks': How the Media Are Framing the Governor's Lies.  On Tuesday, Gov. Tim Walz (D-MN) and Sen. JD Vance (R-OH) faced off for the vice presidential debate on CBS News.  Walz was reportedly feeling nervous ahead of time, and it certainly showed.  Arguably his worst moment was when he was confronted by co-moderator Margaret Brennan for lying about being in Hong Kong for the Tiananmen Square massacre in 1989.  It's just one of many examples from the pathological liar, and Walz had to know it was coming.  He still seriously flubbed his response, and yet the media keep covering for him.

If Bias Were an Olympic Sport, CBS Would Win Gold.  In a recent vice presidential debate, CBS News anchors Norah O'Donnell and Margaret Brennan faced harsh criticism from political commentators for their apparent bias against Senator JD Vance (R-OH).  Former President Donald Trump took to Truth Social, expressing his discontent with the moderation.  "Margaret Brennan just lied again about the ILLEGAL MIGRANTS let into our Country by Lyin' Kamala Harris, and then she cut off JD's mic to stop him from correcting her!" he stated.  [Tweet]  As reported by Breitbart, observers noted that the moderators frequently interrupted Vance, while the same scrutiny did not seem to apply to his opponent, Governor Tim Walz (D).  Critics argue that the questions posed to Vance were framed in a way that undermined his responses, reflecting a clear disparity in the treatment of the two candidates.  [Video clip]

Ridiculous 'fact check' of a true statement during CBS debate.  Sen. JD Vance was accurately describing the migrant crisis fueled by Kamala Harris and Joe Biden when CBS moderator Margaret Brennan decided to insert herself with a "fact check."  "Just to clarify for our viewers, Springfield, Ohio does have a large number of Haitian migrants who have legal status," she said smugly.  Vance was rightly annoyed by the interruption and said, "The rules were that you guys weren't going to fact-check, and since you're fact-checking me, I think it's important to say what's actually going on."  He then proceeded to truthfully, forcefully explain what "legal status" means: [...]

Kamala Eliminating Taxes on Tips is Good, Trump Eliminating Them is Bad, According to CBS.  In the wake of Kamala Harris copying Donald Trump's plan to eliminate taxes on tips for service and hospitality workers, mainstream media outlet CBS demonstrated obvious bias in its coverage of the two candidates.  For Harris, CBS' X description was: "Vice President Kamala Harris is rolling out a new policy position, saying she'll fight to end taxes on tips for service and hospitality workers."  For Trump, CBS' X description was: "Former President Donald Trump's vow to stop taxing tips would cost the federal government up to $250 billion over ten years, according to nonpartisan watchdog group."  Author Tim Murtaugh shared the side-by-side on X, joking that "Only sharp-eyed readers will be able to spot the difference in the coverage of the two proposals."

The Press Rush to Put Lipstick on the Pig, but the Tim Walz Pick Is a Disaster for Democrats.  Who is Walz?  He's a Bernie Sanders clone whose record is so left-wing that Trump could run a new ad every single day from now until the election.  That didn't stop the press from quickly trying to put lipstick on the pig, though.  In the aftermath of the news, CBS News described him as a "centrist" who likes to cook casseroles.  [Tweet with video clip]

CBS Implies Kamala Harris Should Be Exempt From Criticism.  The bitter Sunday afternoon announcement that President Joe Biden would end his reelection bid spurred hours of live network television coverage. [...] The news wasn't two hours old before Robert Costa warned the Republican attacks were going to be "rough and tumble like we've never seen it."  He received a text from Donald Trump Jr. "already attacking Vice President Harris, saying she owns the entire policy of President Biden, even more liberal, and he's saying she's not competent!"  Stop.  What in that statement is rougher than we've ever seen?  The Democrats and their staunch media allies compare Donald Trump to Hitler and other mass-murdering dictators.  They explicitly call him an "existential threat" to democracy.  How is it then "rough" to say Harris is ultraliberal and incompetent?

Real-Time History Rewrite:  CBS Casts Biden as LBJ.  The first draft of history, specifically, President Joe Biden's decision to withdraw from his campaign to seek reelection, is being rewritten in real time.  In addition to being likened to Washington and Cincinnatus, Biden is now drawing media comparisons to Lyndon Baines Johnson. [...] We were told that Biden is stepping down due to bad polling, proof evident that he had no path to victory in 2024.  But now we are getting a sliver of an admission that health was always a concern.  The media are slowly circling back to what everyone else already knew to be true.  Of course, the big rewrite of history here is that Biden is somehow walking away from a second term in a patriotic exercise.  This isn't the case, either.  The truth is that Biden was pushed out of the race by his own party due to the aforementioned bad polling after the disastrous June 20th debate, which exposed the cognitive decline that people talked about for so long but never drew coverage in the media.

CBS News ousts top exec accused of blocking correspondent's Hunter Biden laptop coverage.  CBS News president Ingrid Ciprian-Matthews — who was accused of sidelining white journalists and blocking an acclaimed correspondent's reporting on the Hunter Biden laptop — is stepping down at the network, the company said Wednesday [7/10/2024].  The controversial news boss, who was named president just last August, is exiting after she made headlines in February over the firing of Catherine Herridge, a respected senior investigative reporter who had been doggedly covering the Hunter Biden laptop story for the network.  At the time, media insiders speculated that Herridge's exit was linked to her reporting that President Biden may have kept evidence that he had foreign business dealings while in office.

Poll: 62% of registered voters support the deportation of all illegal immigrants.  CBS News host Margaret Brennan expressed bewilderment at the findings of a recent poll indicating majority support for deporting all illegal immigrants.  "Homeland Security says that President Biden has already deported or repatriated more people in the past year than any year since 2010.  And then, depending on the details of what's talked about on the campaign trail, some of what Mr. Trump talks about could be illegal," Brennan observed.  Continuing her analysis, she remarked, "It doesn't seem practical, in some sense, to round up children.  And then we know that the courts have questioned whether local authorities would have the ability to do it, and federal authorities don't have the resources.  So what exactly do people think they're supporting?"

The Editor says...
Deporting all illegal aliens is not infeasible.  They will deport themselves, or at least line up at the deportation office, if all welfare benefits are cut off, all Spanish-language broadcasting is turned off, and a few of their employers are threatened with legal action.  Conduct all public business exclusively in English.  Make the foreigners encounter friction wherever they go, and they'll leave.  Nobody is clamoring for more illegal aliens.  Even the people in "sanctuary cities" are sick of them.

'60 Minutes' Gets Caught Red-Handed After Interview With 'Misinformation Expert'.  Leave it to "60 Minutes" to bring on the leader of a "misinformation research group" and then fail to disclose all the pertinent details of her background.  The left-wing news program was caught red-handed when it was revealed that Kate Starbird isn't actually an unbiased arbiter of truth and fiction.  The background of this story involves the following interview, in which Starbird and "60 Minutes'" Lesley Stahl complain that X (formerly Twitter) wasn't at their beck and call to censor content they deem to be "misinformation."  [Tweet with video clip]  What is with left-wing operatives and taking their style cues from Rachel Maddow?  All that's missing is a streak of purple in her hair.  Regardless, on the merits, what Starbird says is derived from either dishonesty or stupidity.

CBS shows that its goal is to support the Socialist Democrats, not report the truth.
CBS Fears Supporting Israel/Opposing Hamas Will Cost Biden Muslim Vote.  On Monday, CBS Mornings joined ABC and NBC with a hair-on-fire warning for President Biden that if he continued to support Israel and oppose Hamas, he risked losing the Muslim vote and possibly losing the 2024 election.  Of course, the source of CBS's moral cowardice in standing up to the terrorist organization was the fear that Democrats could lose the key state of Michigan and former President Trump could become president again.  Co-anchor Tony Dokoupil kicked off the network's kvetching by warning that "The latest CBS News poll, in fact, finds most Americans do not approve of President Biden's handling of the conflict" and "that could make a big difference in Michigan, the swing state where some 200,000 Muslim-Americans live."

Phrases that aren't that great:
Phrases that grate.  Indeed, crazed leftists seek to control the debate with deception and manipulation.  Their linguistic lunacy is promulgated from legacy media in an attempt to control the masses.  CBS Mornings host Gayle King, for example, endeavors to foist upon hapless viewers the term "truthism" as a substitute for "wokeism."

Joe Biden's 60 Minute Interview on Gaza Is the Saddest Media Display I Have Ever Witnessed.  I know many readers here will not like the thought of watching pudding brain mutter his way through a carefully edited and controlled interview by a corporate outlet intent on presenting Biden in the best possible light.  However, you only really need to watch the introduction by CBS host, Scott Pelley.  Never before have I seen a more transparently pathetic political defense presented as the introduction to an interview of a U.S. president.  Pelley was apologetic toward Biden in the extreme, leading the viewer into an interview with prescripted justification and excuses for the content that would follow.  Watching Pelley set up this interview elicits a sense of embarrassment that such a set-up is needed.  When he gets into the interview, Pelley actually constructs the talking points for Biden, with explanations and outlines that provide simple yes/no answers from Biden.  This interview is so soft, it becomes pathetic to watch:  [Video clip]

'60 Minutes' Escorts Fumbling Biden, Slams Danger of 'Hard-Right Republicans'.  Once again, former CBS Evening News anchor Scott Pelley politely offered President Joe Biden a helpful platform to pretend he's taking the tough questions.  A year ago, Pelley promoted Biden on more domestic concerns, while this was entirely about the Israel-Hamas war.  The worst question was Pelley suggesting "hard-right Republicans" are making the world more dangerous with their failure to elect a new Speaker.  [Tweet with video clip] [...] Some thought the president looked doddering — and the interview was carefully edited by his CBS friends.  Pelley admitted Biden was, well, "tired" from running the country.  [Tweet with video clip]

The Editor says...
Joe Biden does not run this country.  He doesn't even manage his own daily schedule.  I doubt if he is capable of dressing himself.  So, he's not tired from running the country, or maintaining world peace, or halting the rising sea levels.  He's tired because he's a very decrepit and feeble old man who should have retired several years ago.

CBS 'News' [is being Criticized] For Downplaying Massacre Of Israeli Civilians.  CBS News took a wave of backlash on Thursday after publishing an X post that appeared to downplay the horrific terror attacks Hamas perpetrated against Israeli civilians, leaving over 1,300 dead and thousands more wounded.  The post in question referenced the incredible survival story of 10-month-old twins whose parents hid them just before the Hamas terrorists arrived at Kfar Aza kibbutz, killing the parents and numerous others — including children and babies.  But what people took issue with was not the story itself — rather, it was the use of scare quotes around the word massacre: "10-month-old Israeli twins were found hidden and unharmed at kibbutz where Hamas 'massacred' their parents and beheaded children."  [Tweet]

CBS's Gayle King suggests high gas prices come from 'extreme heat,' makes no mention of Biden policies.  CBS News' Gayle King told the channel's audience that one of the reasons gas prices have been going up is a result of "extreme heat." President Joe Biden's policies were not mentioned as a factor.  The CBS Mornings segment aired on Friday morning and King claimed that the rise in gas prices has been due to the heat of the summer.  She did not mention any economic policy.

Ted Cruz Advisor Has Great Question About That Ray Epps Interview.  Why is the FBI only answering "60 Minutes" now?  This failure also excited more comments from people about Epps' status, because once again, as with so many other things, the FBI refused to be straight -forward on the matter.  These are the same folks who now have reportedly been looking to develop sources within Catholic Churches to fink on their fellow congregants.  Now, I'm not saying that Epps is a "fed."  However, it isn't hard to see that there is a fundamental difference between a statement to Congress and one to "60 Minutes," as some noted.  [Tweet]  But even if you're not under oath, it's still a potential crime to intentionally say something false to Congress.  The FBI statement was also terse to say the least, only covering the FBI being a source or employee.  It doesn't deny other agencies.  While the FBI is now disavowing Epps in a statement, not under oath or to Congress, there have been other reports about informants, including about one high up in the Oathkeepers who was allegedly secretly reporting about the group's activities in the lead-up to Jan. 6.

60 Minutes Basically Screams, 'Leave Ray Epps Alone!'  [Scroll down]  All anyone has to do is compare Epps' story with that of Jacob Chansley, aka the "QAnon Shaman," to see how ridiculous Epps' claims of targeting and persecution are.  How many of the J6 prisoners had a five-acre ranch to sell so that they could go into hiding?  How many of them have been invited onto 60 Minutes and agreed to an interview?  Inquiring minds want to know.  Yet, CBS went there anyway, because the January 6 narrative of the evil Donald Trump/MAGA attempt to "overthrow democracy" must be kept alive. [...] Once again, if for no other reason other than being curious journalists, why hasn't CBS or 60 Minutes interviewed any J6 prisoners and attempted to cover their stories?  Most of these men and women did not have the luxury of being able to go into hiding.  Many were SWATTED, arrested, and have been languishing in gulags for going on three years now.

'60 Minutes' Portrays Ray Epps as a Victim as He Provides the Sob Story.  Ray Epps sat for a '60 Minutes' interview that aired Sunday night, and it didn't sit well with Republicans.  The show portrayed Epps as a victim who only stood out because he's 6'4".  The host claimed the actions of Ray Epps were only a "conspiracy' theory."  The 6'4" victim blames Fox News and well-known conservatives for casting him as an organizer of January 6th.  His actions were miniaturized.  However, Epps took credit for orchestrating the riot!  No one hatched that in some wild conspiracy.  '60 Minutes' asks Ray Epps about texting a relative, "I orchestrated it," after leaving Jan. 6 Capitol riot, "I was boasting to my nephew. [...] I shouldn't have used that word," Epps said.

60 Minutes Steps Up to Defend Ray Epps, Who Is Absolutely Not a Fed, Oh No.  The media love affair with the most suspicious person involved with the Left's Jan. 6 hoax, Ray Epps, continues.  On Sunday evening, 60 Minutes is planning to air a profile of Epps, a man whom they claim has been unjustly vilified in the conservative media.  In doing so, they're just calling new attention to the gaping holes in their Jan. 6 propaganda narrative.  The Leftist political and media elites have been insisting ever since Jan. 6, 2021, that the disturbance at the Capitol on that day constituted an "insurrection," an actual attempt to overthrow the government of the United States and, presumably, to install Donald Trump as a dictator.  Over the intervening two years, the Left's case has steadily unraveled, and one of the most glaring examples of its weakness has been the curious case of Epps.  Amid all the hysteria about "MAGA Republicans" supposedly determining to storm the Capitol and overthrow the government, Epps is the only person who was captured on video actually exhorting people to enter the building.  Yet instead of being arrested, Epps has become a media darling.  Suspicious?  In the extreme.

Ray Epps Is Going on '60 Minutes,' and the Gaslighting Has Already Started.  Ray Epps, who I'm assured just wants to be left alone to live in peace and harmony, is doing what all people who want to be left alone do: He's going on 60 Minutes to get backslaps from the press.  The left-wing CBS News show, which has been caught in numerous journalistic scandals over the last several years, began plugging the interview on Friday.  It will air Sunday evening, but the gaslighting has already started.

Michelle Obama is not a fan of the Second Amendment and says Obama administration was scandal-free.  Michelle Obama has a short memory.  Or, at the least, a selective memory.  She was interviewed by her real-life friend CBS morning show host Gayle King (Oprah's BFF) Thursday.  The soft interview was to promote Michelle's latest projects which include a Netflix special based on her most recent book, "The Light We Carry."  She told Gayle King that "unfettered" access to guns is a bad thing.  And she said that there were no scandals in the Obama administration.  That level of gaslighting is what we've come to expect from Obama fans and King is in that camp.  How nice that she allows her friend to re-write history and doesn't bother to challenge her narrative.

CBS News Bans Reporters From Using the Word 'Transgender' To Describe Transgender Nashville Shooter.  The tragic shootings in Tennessee this week have unsurprisingly brought out the worst in progressive media.  Although three of the victims were children, a fact that should dominate the coverage of such a terrible crime, mainstream outlets have spent an inordinate amount of time lamenting the "increased danger" to transgender people after learning the shooter identified as transgender.  Now comes word that one outlet actually went so far as to ban reporters from using the term "transgender" to describe the transgender shooter.  In an exclusive report on Thursday, The New York Post revealed CBS News executives sent out a memo demanding staff purposefully ignore the shooter's gender identity, even though police indicated her transgender identity was most likely a motivating factor in the shooting spree.

60 Minutes Attempts to Walk Back Doubts Over Covid Lab Leak Theory.  The long-established, once viewed as credible journalism CBS News program, 60 Minutes, attempted to clear the air about the origins of COVID-19 after a year of declaring the lab-leak theory "debunked."  After FBI Director Christopher Wray agreed with the bombshell report by the Washington Street Journal, revealing that the United States Department of Energy concluded that COVID "most likely arose from a laboratory leak," 60 Minutes is walking back their previous comments about the matter.  In May 2020, CBS News's Scott Pelley cast significant doubt over the Trump Administration's assertions that the virus was leaked from a lab in Wuhan, China saying, "both the White House and the Chinese Communist Party have been less than honest."

Those Abandoning Blue States Should Abandon Democrats, Too.  A recent New York Post article declared that, in a "staggering exodus," in 2022, more residents of New York moved to Florida "than any other year in history." [...] In what is almost certainly an effort to cover for Democrats, CBS News practically ignores the politics of the Blue State Exodus and benignly points to "more affordable housing and plentiful jobs" in red states as the main reasons for citizens fleeing Democrat-dominated states.  CBS News brushes off the idea that higher taxes in blue states are contributing to this mass exodus, and it fails to mention at all crime, COVID-lockdown policies, and the like as reasons for the growing number of "leftugees."  Much, and likely the vast majority, of the population loss in blue states is due to those fleeing even higher-taxed and more crime-ridden large U.S. cities.

The leftist media's reliance on liars and frauds.  This past weekend's "60 Minutes," the once highly respected and popular CBS newsmagazine, decided to do a scare piece on climate change.  The premise: Earth is headed toward a "sixth mass extinction" if we don't embrace a zero-emissions stance and reject our capitalist society.  To back up these outlandish claims, CBS correspondent Scott Pelley interviewed the discredited biologist Paul Ehrlich, who has predicted about 20 extinctions over the past 60 years, not one of which came to pass.  In 1968, Mr. Ehrlich warned in his book "The Population Bomb" that "the battle to feed all of humanity is over.  In the 1970s, hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now."  He added that oceans would be without life by 1979, and by 1999 the U.S. population would plummet to 23 million because of the use of pesticides.  "The death rate will increase until at least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next ten years," he predicted in an interview with Mademoiselle in 1970.  Mr. Ehrlich, of course, was fantastically wrong.

RIP: CBS News (1927-2022).  The decline and fall of CBS News has been something to watch in recent years.  The network was founded in 1927, and just recently passed away from pure stupidity.  [Tweet]  The exact cause of the illness that finally brought down CBS News was the Hunter Biden laptop story.  Here's CBS News in 2020 telling its audience that the contents of Hunter Biden's laptop isn't real — it's disinformation.  [Tweet]  The 60 Minutes anchor Lesley Stahl was briefly released from the Dan Rather Rest Home for Disgraced Journalists to interview President Trump in the run-up to the 2020 election.  Stahl spent her time during the interview gaslighting the American public about the laptop.  (She also insisted that the Obama administration did not spy on the Trump campaign.) [...] It was an open secret at the time why CBS News — and the rest of the major corporate media outlets — tried to discredit the Hunter Biden laptop story.  It was well known that Obama/Biden political operatives had warned the big media outlets that anyone who reported the truth about Hunter Biden's laptop would be frozen out by the Biden Administration (if he won).  In other words, CBS News protected the Bidens — and sold out its remaining viewers.  Two years later — and two years too late — the network has now changed its tune because it doesn't matter anymore.

60 Minutes' Scott Pelley Gets an 'F' for His Joe Biden Interview.  Until last weekend, President Joe Biden hadn't given an interview to an American news network in seven months, or some 223 days.  Think about that.  We literally have a United States president who is not answerable to the public, and who spends his days hiding behind his handlers, Teleprompters, cheat sheets, and wife Jill.  He did finally deign to appear on CBS News 60 Minutes on Sunday, and he dropped enough news to keep RedState reporters working overtime.  Yours truly reported how Biden warned Putin not to use nukes in the Ukraine war; streiff reported how the president pledged to defend Taiwan even though that is not the official U.S. position; Nick Arama told us how Joe bragged that he'd been busy depleting the Strategic Petroleum Reserve and then dismissed any concerns about the business dealings of his troubled son Hunter; Bonchie wrote about Joe's brushing off skyrocketing inflation before he suddenly declared that COVID is over...  Phew.  The list goes on.  [Tweet with video clip]

CBS Economic Gaslighting Example, Face the Nation Pretends Not to Know Joe Biden Energy Policy Driving Higher Prices.  "Gaslighting" is essentially a term used to describe an abuser continually lying to victim in order to make the victim misbelieve reality.  Economic "gaslighting" is a process of lying about the nature of true cause in order to continue advancing the abusive policy.  Combine the economic gaslighting with the historic leftist approach of pretending not to know things, and you get this dynamic on CBS Face the Nation today.  In this brief segment describing inflation, we see all the classic strategies deployed by ideological media.  First, notice they blame:  (1) the pandemic recovery, (2) consumer demand, (3) Ukraine, and (4) a supply chain 'muddle'.  Not only are these issues ridiculous, but none of them are the cause of supply side inflation.  Blaming "consumer demand," which has transparently collapsed for the last year, is beyond nonsense.  Watch, and also pay attention to the graphics they use to manipulate the audience:  [Video clip]

Scientists warn South Florida coastal cities will be affected by sea level rise.  Sea level rise is increasing at a dramatic rate.  Scientists at the University of Miami warn that if we don't act soon, coastal cities and towns will slowly diminish.  Scientists say a few decades from now, downtown Miami will be underwater.  ["]The tide is coming in and eventually it's not going to go back out," says Dr. Harold Wanless, a Geologist and Professor of Geography and Sustainable Development at University of Miami[.]  "Climate change is real.  This isn't something that might happen," he says.  "The problem is, sea level is rising at an accelerating rate now because of ice melting in Greenland and Antarctica.  So for now what is just a high tide — a rare high tide... is going to become a frequent high tide," he says.  So what does that mean for us?  According to Dr. Wanelss's research, by the year 2060, nearly 60% of Miami-Dade county will be underwater.  "Now since the ice melt started we're up to a rate of almost two feet per century," he says.

The Editor says...
[#1] There is no unusual "ice melt" occurring in Antarctica or Greenland that would cause the world-wide sea level to increase by a foot or more.  [#2] All of New Orleans is below sea level.  Somehow they deal with it.  How much of the city of New Orleans is flooded today?  [#3] The professor at the center of this news report will be retired and most likely deceased bu 2060, so he will be immune to criticism when his prediction falls flat.

CBS Caught Scripting Fake News, Narrative Engineer Norah O'Donnell.  CBS narrative engineer Norah O'Donnell made the rounds today proclaiming the DOJ did not seize President Trump's passports.  At least that was the carefully constructed narrative within her messaging.

DOJ admits Trump passports were taken after CBS anchor O'Donnell reports not.  The Justice Department admitted late Monday [8/15/2022] that former President Donald Trump's passports were taken by FBI agents who searched his Florida home last week — hours after "CBS Evening News" anchor Norah O'Donnell tweeted that she had been told otherwise.  Late Monday, Trump spokesman Taylor Budowich tweeted a screenshot of an email from a member of the Justice Department's National Security Division that acknowledged the bureau removed the 45th president's travel documents from Mar-a-Lago.  "We have learned that the filter agents seized three passports belonging to President Trump, two expired and one being his active diplomatic passport," the email said.

Trump Team Drops Email Proving FBI Wrongly Seized Passports After Media, DOJ Attempted to Mislead Public with Spin.  Donald Trump's legal team demolished the Department of Justice's (DOJ) media spin that denied having the former president's passports in their possession following the FBI's raid on Mar-a-Lago last week.  On Monday, former President Trump claimed on his social media site TruthSocial that the FBI "stole" his passports during the raid that shook the political world last week. [...] "According to a DOJ official, the FBI is NOT in possession of former President Trump's passports.  Trump had accused the FBI of stealing his three passports during the search of his Mar-a-Lago home," O'Donnell announced on Monday.  [Tweet]  Shortly after Norah's post, Taylor Budowich, the former president's communications director, shared an email from Jay Bratt, the top counterintelligence official in the Justice Department's national security division, confirming that three passports were seized in the raid and that they would be returned to the former president soon.

Trump Team Publishes Alleged DOJ Email Refuting Claim That FBI Didn't Take Passports.  A spokesperson for former President Donald Trump published an alleged email from a top DOJ email stating that the president's passports were accidentally taken during the raid on his home last week.  "In the raid by the FBI of Mar-a-Lago, they stole my three Passports (one expired), along with everything else," Trump wrote on social media.  CBS News anchor Norah O'Donnell later tweeted that "[a]ccording to a DOJ official, the FBI is NOT in possession of former President Trump's passports." A spokesperson for Trump later responded directly to her tweet by posting a screenshot of an alleged email from Justice Department counterintelligence chief Jay Bratt that stated that the passports were being returned.

Trump Accused of Lying Over FBI-Seized Passports, Then He Dropped the Receipts.  As RedState reported on Monday, Donald Trump accused the FBI of taking his passports during the unprecedented raid of his Florida residence.  According to the former president, three passports were taken during the search, which apparently went far beyond just recovering supposedly classified documents that threatened "national security."  Predictably, after Trump made the claim, the press quickly jumped into the fray to call him a liar.  Norah O'Donnell of CBS News claimed via a source that the FBI was "not in possession of former President Trump's passports."  [Tweet]  "Not in possession of" is very specific wording that could have simply meant the FBI had passed them on to another agency.  Why not just say "we didn't take the passports" if they didn't take the passports?  Well, as it turns out, Trump's team was ready and waiting with the receipts that showed the press narrative was a falsehood.  [Tweet]

'60 Minutes' Enables FBI Dysfunction.  Scott Pelley of "60 Minutes" didn't tell his viewers whether FBI Director Christopher Wray imposed conditions before agreeing to be interviewed on camera by CBS.  But his slobbering pro-FBI questions, which aired Sunday, had the feel of something Wray's communication director may have fed the "news" program. [...] Under Wray, the FBI has disgraced itself with misconduct and abuse of power.  In the days leading up to the interview, victims of serial child molestor and Olympic gymnastics doctor Larry Nassar sued the FBI for $130 million after agents charged with investigating the abuse instead covered it up by fabricating victim statements.  Pelly [sic] failed to ask Wray a single question about the scandal.  Pelley also failed to ask Wray about the humiliating acquittal of two men the FBI attempted to entrap into the Governor Gretchen Whitmer plot engineered by the FBI to interfere in the 2020 election.  Among the FBI agents involved, one was accused of perjury, another of wife beating (now convicted), and a third of using the investigation to help promote a side-business.  Nor did Pelley ask about the FBI child rapist who rampaged across multiple states for years under the noses of his colleagues responsible for protecting such victims, some younger than 13.  Nor did Pelley ask about the FBI's failure to stop the Jeffery Epstein child-rape-for-profit business.  An FBI lawyer pleaded guilty to falsifying evidence to help spy on a Trump campaign figure.  Pelley didn't ask about that, either.

CBS Outlines Causes of Massive Inflation, Identifies Everything Except Biden Policy.  This Sunday [4/17/2022] segment from CBS's Margaret Brennan allows us to watch narrative engineering in real time.  During a segment outlining the reasons behind the major economic issues American's are feeling, CBS notes everything except the reason the economy is struggling.  It really is quite a remarkable example of professional gaslighting.  Watch the segment, note the inflation crisis has been underway for more than 18 months, and notice how many justifications are made-up illusions.  (1) A Texas-Mexico cargo checkpoint issue that started less than a week ago; (2) Trucker shortages; (3) Ukraine-Russia which started only 6 weeks ago; and (4) Pandemic lockdowns, now causing an excess in demand.  None of these issues are even close to the source of the issue.  [Video clip]

Latest January 6th 'Bombshell' About Donald Trump Smolders in Ruin.  Some days ago, CBS News ran a "BREAKING" report asserting that there were gaps in the White House telephone logs from January 6th.  The story centered on two assertions:  One, that the Trump administration had altered the call logs, and two, that the then-president had used a burner phone during the time period in question.  From there, the implication was made that those actions were taken to cover up an organized insurrection being directed by Donald Trump. [...] Now, if you read RedState, you may be aware of a similar story that dropped a few months earlier.  Back in February, the January 6th Committee started leaking about a major revelation involving gaps in the White House's phone records.  Yet, if you read past the hysteria at the time, what you would have found is that there was no actual gap.  Rather, calls were being made on the phones of staffers and other phone records reflected that.

Lesley Stahl Told President Trump in Her October 2020 Interview Before the Election the Hunter Biden Laptop "Can't Be Verified" — She Lied.  Lesley Stahl has quite a career of lies.  Her most famous interview to date was when she lied repeatedly to the American public in her interview with President Trump in October 2020 before the presidential election.  Stahl was carrying water for the Biden crime family.  She must be very proud.  The country is doing so well.  You can thank the far left hacks in the fake news media for doing their best to lie to the American public about Joe Biden and his family's crimes.  To this day the mainstream media still won't report on Joe's obvious dementia that is obvious to everyone else in the world.  Back in October 2020 President Trump defended himself in his interview with Stahl saying there was proof of Joe Biden's criminal actions in Hunter Biden's laptop.  Lesley Stahl shut him down.

Ted Cruz Taunts '60 Minutes' With Infamous Trump/Stahl Pre-Election Clip as Media Reckoning Begins.  With the implosion of the media's pre-presidential election fake narratives about the infamous Hunter Biden laptop emails becoming officially official with the New York Times' "confirming" of the New York Post's original reporting on the subject, the calls for media reckonings have understandably commenced apace.  As you'll recall, the Post's pieces on the emails raised major questions about the possibility of influence peddling from the Biden family, in particular with Joe Biden, who was the Democratic nominee for president, and his son Hunter.  The official word from the MSM at the time centered around a fake "Russian disinformation" narrative sparked by a Politico report, allegedly sourced by "dozens of former intel officials" who suggested in so many words that Russia cooked up the email scandal to influence the 2020 presidential election.  Ironically, a little less than a year after that notorious Politico report went viral, one of their political correspondents was able to get "independent" confirmation for a book he was writing on the Bidens that at least two of the emails discovered on Hunter Biden's abandoned laptop were authentic.

Anderson Cooper's '60 Minutes' Softball Infomercial for Pete Buttigieg.  The long-running CBS News program "60 Minutes" has a manically split personality:  Vicious attack dogs when Republicans are in power, but supportive infomercial producers under Democrats.  Take March 13 for example, when Anderson Cooper hosted a promotional segment for Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and the "bipartisan infrastructure bill."  Buttigieg was touted as "40 years old, a Harvard graduate, Rhodes Scholar, and former Navy Reserve officer who ran for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2020.  Now he's dealing with a pandemic-related supply chain crisis and trying to ensure that hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars are well-spent on aging transportation systems in desperate need of repair."  CBS began with a Pittsburgh bridge collapse from January, as Cooper asked Buttigieg a series of bland softballs, such as:  "When somebody's driving over a bridge, should they feel confident?"  Then Cooper followed up:  "When grading the overall state of this country's infrastructure, the American Society of Civil Engineers recently gave the U.S. a C-minus.  How is it possible that a country like the United States gets a C-minus on infrastructure?"  These are easy pitches.  They sound like questions Buttigieg's publicist emailed to CBS.

As Financial Markets Crash and Ukraine Burns, There's Nowhere Left to Hide for the Biden Administration.  Then there is the resolving picture of all the mysterious puzzle pieces in the Covid-19 story.  Sunday night, America's premier propaganda vessel, CBS's 60-Minutes, ran a puff-piece on the CDC starring the warm-and-fuzzy Mom figure, Rochelle Walensky.  It is hard to overstate just how dishonest the segment was, starting with its subtle effort to keep America in a state of alarm ("new variants" coming!), proceeding to a deceptive cartoon of how the mRNA "vaccines" work wonders ("white memory cells patrol the body," no mention of spike proteins), and concluding with exhortations for Americans to continue vaxxing and boosting up — despite an avalanche of news coming from elsewhere than 60-Minutes about the CDC withholding critical information from the public it's supposed to serve throughout the two-year-plus crisis, not to mention new data from alt-media on extensive injury and death rates among the vaccinated, including shocking info from the court-ordered recent release of Pfizer's own records.  Was this 60-Minutes segment corporate media's attempt to cover up the emerging crimes of America's public health agencies in concert with Pharma and media itself?  That is, to get ahead of the story, as has lately been the strategy for all the cable channels and legacy newspapers with more and more citizens asking themselves if they have been played?  Meanwhile, the Big Kahuna of Covid-19, one Dr. Anthony Fauci, has gone-to-ground, made himself scarce, skipped the scene, vamoosed... amid all the new controversy.

Mike Lindell and CPAC Attendees Shout Down Fake News CBS Reporter At CPAC.  Mike Lindell was confronted by a CBS reporter earlier today at the annual CPAC conference in Orlando, Florida.  Mike totally roasted the reporter and CBS News, calling them "disgusting" and "traitors" to America.  The crowd on CPAC's media row joined Lindell and started chanting "traitor, traitor, traitor" at the fake news reporter.  America is done with the fake news propaganda.

CBS News:  The source for inflation and supply-chain woes is ... Ukraine?  How did a crisis in February 2022 kick off inflation in (checks notes) May 2021? Through the magic of narrative journalism, my friends, through the magic of narrative journalism.  CBS News offered up this Twitter hot take on two major Biden administration failures by blaming them on Russia's aggression in Ukraine. [...] This is nothing more than a cheap and transparent attempt to excuse Biden from any responsibility for inflation and the supply-chain crisis.  It's so bald in this effort that it borders on self-parody, as is the fact that CBS hasn't taken this tweet down as of this writing despite the roars of laughter and gales of criticism they're getting on Twitter over it.

CBS Outlines Collapsed Support for Biden Regime, But Purposefully Ignore One Central Component of Their Own Poll.  CBS conducted a poll of the collapsed support for Joe Biden and then outlined their findings earlier today [1/16/2022].  However, keeping up with their need to ignore things, they skip over how the vaccination mandate is opposed within their responses.  Margaret Brennan and Anthony Salvanto, CBS News' director of elections and surveys, discuss how inflation and the economy are the two central issues at the top of concern.  However, Joe Biden's handling of COVID, and specifically the vaccination mandate, are also driving opposition to the regime intent.  [Video clip]  The people behind Biden have boxed him in on the economic consequences.  Inflation is an outcome of economic policy that cannot be reversed without completely refuting their own policy and reversing course.  As a consequence, there's nothing Biden can do to stop this negative outcome.

Top five media lies of 2021.  [#4] "60 Minutes" deceptively edited Ron DeSantis interview:  CBS News' "60 Minutes "deceptively edited a clip from a press conference that Florida governor Ron DeSantis gave about the distribution of the COVID-19 vaccine.  The misleading clip suggests that DeSantis had awarded Publix, a popular supermarket chain in Florida, with the opportunity to distribute the COVID-19 vaccines because of the campaign donations he received from the corporation.  CBS removed all the parts DeSantis spent explaining that Publix had actually been selected due to the hundreds of locations they had across the state, leaving only the part he calls the accusations "fake narrative."  CBS never apologized or retracted the video.

CBS' 'Face the Nation' corrects claim Rittenhouse crossed state lines while armed: 'Oversight in language'.  CBS' "Face the Nation" had to issue a correction after a reporter claimed on Sunday that Kyle Rittenhouse crossed state lines "armed for battle" ahead of his deadly encounter in Kenosha, Wisconsin.  In the initial report, reporter Mark Strassman suggested Rittenhouse crossed state lines, from Illinois into Wisconsin, with a gun in his possession.  However, court testimony and police interviews revealed that the Smith & Wesson M&P 15 rifle Rittenhouse used during the Kenosha riots was already in the city ahead of his trip.  "Lots to unpack here, this country's ongoing moment of racial reckoning, vigilantism, and self-defense claims from armed people who deputize themselves," Strassman added.

CBS Corrects False Claim Rittenhouse Crossed State Lines While Armed.  CBS has corrected the false claim a reporter offered on air regarding Kyle Rittenhouse.  On Sunday's [11/21/2021] "Face the Nation," Mark Strassman falsely reported that Rittenhouse "drove in from Illinois armed for battle."  The falsehood was one of many spread by news outlets and influencers in the wake of Rittenhouse being acquitted.  The network has not responded to a request for comment and Strassman couldn't be reached.  Viewers weren't made aware of the misinformation but CBS has added an editor's note to the transcript of the morning show.  "Kyle Rittenhouse testified that he did not drive to Kenosha with a weapon.  It was not illegal for Rittenhouse to posses [sic] that particular weapon.  We apologize for this oversight in language," CBS said in the note.

The Editor says...
Preventing an "oversight in language" is what the well-paid managing editors are for.  And if this had been the first and only time that a poor choice of words was used to describe Mr. Rittenhouse, it might be forgivable, but apparently this was part of a continuing pattern.  All of the managers in the CBS newsroom are responsible for making sure their "news" stories are accurate, truthful, and free of defamatory pronouncements.  In this they failed, and must now pay the price.

CBS News Caught on Camera Admitting they no Longer Care if they're Viewed As Trustworthy Or Objective.  Ron Treviño, CBS Houston News Anchor:  "I don't really care if people trust us or not, we still have to do our job.  Whether they trust us is the least of my concerns — whether they trust me or not."  Finally, a news organization gets caught on camera admitting they're not objectice, nor do they care if people trust their news as accurate.  Project Veritas has once again showed the world just how corrupt the media is.  [Video clip]

No, CBS News, Global Warming Did Not Create Taliban Victory.  CBS News published an article today claiming global warming was a major factor in the Taliban overrunning Afghanistan and creating murderous chaos throughout the country, rather than political ineptitude.  CBS News argues that global warming created horrible weather conditions that decimated crop production during the past 30 years in the country, and the Taliban fed off the misery experienced by Afghan farmers.  The objective truth is entirely the opposite. [...] CBS News claims that climate change in Afghanistan during "the last three decades ... have destroyed crops and left people hungry."  As you can see, however, Afghanistan has fully doubled its crop yields during the past three decades.

CBS Hides Corruption of 1619 Project, Asks 'Impeccable' Creator to 'Clarify'.  The journalists at CBS This Morning on Tuesday [7/6/2021] continued their efforts to hide the historical illiteracy and massive errors in the 1619 Project.  Co-host Gayle King devoted 10 minutes to gushing over lead writer Nikole Hannah-Jones[,] The New York Times journalist who just turned down a professorship position at the University of North Carolina after a tenure battle.  Appearing as an exclusive for CBS, King focused on Hannah-Jones's move to Howard University and her rejection of UNC.  As for the 1619 Project, the host fawned, "Can we say you have a 20 year career with impeccable credentials?  Let's talk about the 1619 Project.  Because The New York Times did issue a clarification, not a correction.  They said they have stood by you.  There was a clarification.  What was the clarification and what is your response to the criticism?"

Five MSM Lies for Which Trump Has Been Vindicated, and the Damage They Caused.  [#4] Hunter Biden:  Everyone knew Hunter Biden was a cad, and we also had a pretty good idea that he was on-the-take with foreign actors, particularly in Ukraine.  President Trump knew it as well, made no secret of his thoughts, and got impeached for an unprecedented second time for his efforts.  The media, meanwhile, pooh-poohed the whole story for as long as the could, which just happened to be until after the election in early-December when the validity of the story became clear.  During an appearance on 60 Minutes with Leslie Stahl in late-October, President Trump pointed to the younger Biden and correctly observed that Joe Biden was embroiled in a scandal over his son Hunter, but Stahl was defiant, insisting "He's not.  He's not."  Oh Leslie, he is.  He is.  So, what if the media had told us the truth from the beginning with the Hunter Biden Scandal?

Finding a way to present Joe Biden's tax-and-spend speech as a hit with the public.  Joe Biden's quasi state-of-the-union speech the other night was a miserable affair.  With a void of new ideas, Biden shilled a leftist tax-and-spend scheme writ large, with an ugly side of wokesterism.  One problem:  The voting public despises this [stuff].  So out trots the media to put the spin on it, bolstering the old foof, and hammer, hammer, hammering home the lie that Biden's speech was somehow popular. [...] The problem of course, is that the CBS/YouGov poll sampled an audience that was hugely skewed Democrat.  Fifty-four percent of the audience was Democrat, while only 34% of American voters identify as Democrats, as CBS noted lower, way lower, down in the story.  A president's political base is always going to have a positive response to their leader.  If they don't, then it becomes actual news.  Biden's leftist base loves him is the story here, although they didn't put it that way.  What exactly was news about this?

Americans [Doubt] CBS Poll Claiming 85% Approve of Biden Speech.  Democrats are all rabidly promoting a CBS poll about the reaction to Joe Biden's speech before Congress tonight.  The poll claimed that 85% of the viewers they surveyed approved of Biden's speech. [...] Now, we can say a lot about polls, but 85% is North Korea level propaganda.  It's so high you know that there's a problem.  This is basically CBS trying to shill for the Democrats.  They tried to sell that Americans saw Biden as "unifying" and "inspirational." This is Joe Biden, guys, you can't sell that here.  Listen as CBS tells us they spoke to a "representative" sample of Americans to reach those numbers.  Except then as they explain more, the problem comes out.  As they continue, that sample was anything but "representative."  [Video clip]

CBS Attacks Trial Judge for Rebuking Maxine Waters' Call to Violence.  In strong comments during the closing arguments in the Derek Chauvin trial on Monday [4/19/2021], Judge Peter Cahill rebuked radical Democratic Congresswoman Maxine Waters (CA) for calling on Black Lives Matter to be more violent if the jury returned a not guilty verdict.  And like clockwork, the CBS Evening News framed Judge Cahill as the problem, even the aggressor by claiming he was "lashing out" at Waters and perhaps working with the defense team.  Following a segment on the trial's closing arguments in general, CBS anchor Norah O'Donnell stepped in to defend the radical Congresswoman.  "And Jamie, something extraordinary happened after the jury left to deliberate.  The judge lashing out at a U.S. congresswoman.  Even mentioning the possibility, a verdict could be overturned in the future," she teed up correspondent Jamie Yuccas.  Yuccas' first move was to downplay and brush over what Waters said to the BLM mob.

Ron DeSantis Shows How to Fight Back and Stomps All Over '60 Minutes' in the Process.  One of the things that makes Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis so interesting is not only is he smart with a terrific background, but he's also a fighter, he doesn't take any guff from anyone and certainly not from media, as we saw in the case of "60 Minutes."  DeSantis appeared on "Fox and Friends" on Wednesday [4/14/2021] and took the opportunity to just level the CBS show for their deceptive piece against him and their remarks about the piece on their show on Sunday.

The Left Doesn't Want You to Believe in DeSantis Claus.  Is the race for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination already over?  "60 Minutes" seems to think so.  They did a dishonest hatchet job on one governor, leaving all the others jealous that the media doesn't think enough of them to try and destroy them before they become Joe Biden's nemesis.  That governor is Ron DeSantis of Florida.  "60 Minutes" didn't attack Greg Abbott of Texas.  They didn't attack Kristi Noem of South Dakota.  They didn't attack Doug Ducey of Arizona, or even Brian Kemp of Georgia. "60 Minutes" admitted which Republican fuels its nightmares by attacking Florida Man Ron DeSantis.

Has DeSantis Become More Dangerous to Democrats Than Trump?  The other day it was "Sixty Minutes" — Dan Rather's old stomping grounds before he was caught in some big time fibbing, speaking of presidential elections — trying to smear the Florida governor, asserting he had favored Publix in lucrative COVID vaccine distribution because the supermarket chain gave him a campaign donation.  (As is the corporate custom, Publix did the same with virtually every other politician, including, apparently, Bernie Sanders.)  About five minutes serious research would have unearthed the absurdity of this charge — since debunked by several Florida Democrats — but with the anti-DeSantis zeitgeist at the ultra-establishment "Sixty Minutes" five months wouldn't have been enough, even with the myriad producers and assistants working at CBS.  The need to "get" DeSantis overwhelmed all, including, as has been noted everywhere except for most of the mainstream media, cherry-picking the governor's remarks to turn them inside out.

'I Know I'll Be Ordering Mine!': DeSantis Loves New '60 Minutes Of Lies' T-Shirt.  On Friday morning, after the sports website Outkick responded to the "60 Minutes" hit piece on Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis by announcing they were selling a T-shirt emblazoned "60 Minutes of lies," DeSantis quickly responded, quipping, "I know I'll be ordering mine!"  As The Daily Wire has chronicled over the last week, the furor over last Sunday's hit piece by "60 Minutes" was precipitated by its deceptive reporting in which the show elided crucial parts of DeSantis' answer to a query from a "60 Minutes" reporter.

The Media Tried to Smear Ron DeSantis.  It Backfired.  On Sunday [4/4/2021], the CBS show 60 Minutes aired a dishonest, convoluted, story about Florida Governor Ron DeSantis.  The segment leveled a completely unfounded accusation against Gov. DeSantis, accusing him of choosing the Publix supermarket chain to distribute the COVID-19 vaccine because Publix had contributed $100,000 to his Friends of DeSantis campaign PAC.  Anyone who has spent more than five minutes in Florida knows that the Publix chain is ubiquitous and, more importantly, beloved and trusted by Floridians.  The 60 Minutes episode was deeply unethical.  Sharyn Alfonsi, the reporter for 60 Minutes whose story it was, comes off like a political activist in her interaction with DeSantis, accusing the governor of "pay-to-play" after cornering him at a press conference. [...] But the public would not get to hear his response, at least not from CBS.  In an appalling edit, 60 Minutes cut the DeSantis answer to make him seem abrasive and angry and to make his comprehensive answer seem flimsy.

CBS faces bipartisan backlash after '60 Minutes' aired selectively edited footage of DeSantis.  CBS is facing bipartisan backlash after using heavily edited footage of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis in a"60 Minutes" story alleging potential political corruption on the part of the Republican politician.  "60 Minutes" reporter Sharyn Alfonsi alleged in a recent report for the long-running news magazine that wealthy residents of Florida "cut the line during [the state's] frenzied vaccine rollout."  In the segment, Alfonsi suggested that the state government's recent decision to award a vaccine distribution contract to the grocery chain Publix had the appearance of potential favoritism.  Citing public financial records, Alfonsi noted that "weeks before the governor's announcement, Publix donated $100,000 to his political action committee, Friends of Ron DeSantis."  As part of the report, Alfonsi questioned DeSantis at a late March press conference about the arrangement, suggesting the governor had engaged in "pay-to-play" with the grocery chain.

DeSantis Blasts '60 Minutes' Conspiracy Theory About Vaccine Distribution in Florida.  During an interview with Fox News Monday night [4/5/2021], Florida Republican Governor Ron DeSantis blasted 60 Minutes, a CBS News program, for deliberately editing his comments about vaccine distribution.  They did so to make it look like DeSantis was engaged in a pay-for-play scheme, which never happened.  As Leah writes, there are a number of problems with their "reporting."  "Lost in this is we've vaccinated now 3.5 million senior citizens.  We were the first state to say we're doing seniors first.  We're not going to follow the CDC recommendation and what we have done has worked.  They didn't want to discuss that and obviously they selectively edited the background.  They tried to act like their was a conspiracy with Publix," DeSantis said.  "They didn't tell you that we were doing African-American church vaccination drives before Publix ever gave a single shot.  They didn't tell you that.  They didn't tell you that hospitals were doing shots, starting in the first week of December because it did't fit the narrative."

Grenell: False DeSantis Story Was a Strategy, Not a Mistake.  ACLJ Senior Advisor for National Security and Foreign Policy Ric Grenell joins Sekulow to discuss the backlash CBS show 60 Minutes has faced after airing a misleading, inaccurate story about Florida Governor Ron DeSantis' response to COVID-19.  We also discuss how the MLB has moved the All-Star game out of Atlanta in protest of Georgia's new voting laws and how this move will affect Atlanta's working class and small business owners.  [Video clip]

'This Is Not Over': DeSantis Blasts '60 Minutes' Report on Florida's Vaccine Rollout.  Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis harshly criticized a recent "60 Minutes" report in a press conference on Tuesday [4/6/2021].  "They cut out everything that showed that their narrative was a piece of horse manure," DeSantis said.  The governor was referring to how "60 Minutes" omitted 356 words from his 423-word answer in their report.  "And it shows you how dishonest, these are smear merchants, that's why nobody trusts corporate media.  They are a disaster in what they're doing.  They knew what they were doing was a lie.  I knew what they were doing was a lie.  Everybody here knows what they were doing is a lie.  They know that we know they're lying and yet they continue to lie," he continued.  DeSantis then reasserted his intent to defend himself against the allegations and hold the corporate media responsible.

How the '60 Minutes' Hit on Ron DeSantis Collapsed into a Steaming Pile of Fake News60 Minutes, a long-disgraced news magazine that airs on far-left CBS, launched a political assassination attempt against Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-FL) Sunday night.  By Monday afternoon, this shamelessly dishonest hoax and conspiracy theory had collapsed into a steaming pile of fake news.  According to the long-disgraced 60 Minutes, DeSantis accepted a $100,000 political donation from Publix supermarkets and then awarded Publix with a vaccine contract.  In other words: pay-for-play.  Here's how the hoax fell apart:  It began with the discovery that the long-disgraced 60 Minutes had deliberately and maliciously edited a clip of DeSantis while he answered a round of questions and heckling from disgraced-60 Minutes correspondent Sharyn Alfonsi.  Through this deliberate act of malicious editing, the long-disgraced 60 Minutes tried to make DeSantis look like a fool as he dodged her question.  The truth, however, as we saw in the full video, is that he answered her question at detailed length and did so to the satisfaction of any reasonable person.

"60 Minutes should be ashamed": Dem Palm Beach County mayor says CBS smeared Ron DeSantis with Publix segment.  Do you know how unfair a story has to be to a Republican, especially a Trumpist Republican with national ambitions, for multiple Democrats to step up in his defense?  That's where we are with the "60 Minutes" hit piece on DeSantis, which Ed covered this morning.  The nutshell version:  Publix, a ubiquitous supermarket chain in Florida, donated $100,000 to DeSantis and ended up partnering with the state to distribute the COVID vaccine.  Smells like a quid pro quo to us, "60 Minutes" asserted.  But Jared Moskowitz, the director of the Florida's Division of Emergency Management, said that was nonsense, claiming that Publix was recommended by experts because other big-chain pharmacies weren't ready to start vaccinating yet.

Florida Democrats Defend DeSantis Against Attack From '60 Minutes'.  Several Florida Democrats are challenging a report by the CBS News program "60 Minutes" that attempted to paint the state's vaccination partnership with the Publix grocery store chain as nefarious.  The program on April 4 explored the COVID-19 vaccine rollout in Florida, which has experienced a similar COVID-19 death rate to California and other states despite having much looser restrictions.  In one heated exchange, a reporter pressed Gov. Ron DeSantis on the use of Publix stores to administer vaccines, claiming the fact that Publix contributed $100,000 to his political action committee before the chain was chosen could be seen as evidence of a "pay-for-play" scheme.  DeSantis called the allegation "a fake narrative," offering a lengthy explanation of what had unfolded.  It included state officials reaching out to pharmacies besides CVS and Walgreens because those two companies were tasked with delivering vaccines to long-term care facilities.

Democratic Florida Officials Explain How 60 Minutes Twisted DeSantis-Publix Story.  Looking to expand COVID-19 vaccine distribution sites over the winter, Florida's emergency management director says he first reached out to Walmart, not Publix, to execute the mission.  The reason:  Walmart has more locations than Publix in socially vulnerable, rural areas in Florida.  But Walmart wouldn't be ready to distribute the vaccine for three weeks, Jared Moskowitz, the state's emergency management director, told National Review.  So, he reached out to Publix, a Florida-based grocery and pharmacy chain.  "Publix said they could be ready in 72 hours," said Moskowitz, who is a Democrat.  "I picked Publix.  Walked into the governor's office the next day, gave them the plan about why we needed to turn on more locations, especially in some rural, fiscally constrained areas."  Moskowitz's take, that he was the one who recommended Publix stores as the state's first pharmacy vaccination sites, runs counter to a 60 Minutes story on Sunday [4/4/2021] that implied that Florida governor Ron DeSantis picked Publix to distribute vaccines as part of a "pay to play" scheme.

60 Minutes' Dishonest DeSantis Hit Job.  There is no more accurate way of describing last night's [4/4/2021] 60 Minutes segment on Governor Ron DeSantis of Florida than as a political hit job.  It was an aspersion, a slander, a smear — a calculated and premeditated calumny contrived for one purpose and one purpose alone:  To hint darkly at scandal where none exists, and, thereby, to damage DeSantis in 2022 and beyond.  Americans who tuned in to 60 Minutes yesterday are now less informed than they were before it aired.

'60 Minutes' Ignores Democrat Governors' Scandals, Invents One About DeSantis.  Rather than cover actual scandals involving Democrat governors and their botched responses to COVID, CBS' "60 Minutes" tried to invent a scandal involving Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis' distribution of vaccines.  To push the false narrative and protect its favored governors, "60 Minutes" refused to interview people who disputed its false narrative, selectively edited video to hide facts, and omitted data that debunked its thesis and accurately describe Florida's success.  It's not that "60 Minutes" couldn't have reported on real scandals involving governors and COVID, if it wanted to.  New York's Democrat Gov. Andrew Cuomo, a media darling despite his many failures, sent COVID patients into long-term care facilities full of vulnerable people, and then covered it up.  California's Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom has imposed draconian lockdown measures that have crushed his state's economy, its schools, and the entire population of the state.  He's currently facing a recall attempt from citizens livid at his handling.

If the Media's Attack on Ron DeSantis Seems Desperate, It's Because It Is.  The 60 Minutes "report" on Ron DeSantis wasn't just ridiculous, it was absolutely bizarre.  Not only did the news show completely deny the science we know about how infectious the Coronavirus is to seniors, they completely left out key elements of the information they gathered to make him seem corrupt.  Why are they doing this?  The reason is desperation.  DeSantis is ruining everything the left is trying to accomplish both in narrative and agenda.  [Video clip]

CBS Attempts To Controversialize Florida Governor Ron DeSantis For Doing Exceptional Job With COVID Response.  You can always tell who the left-wing media fear by the way they attempt to create false attacks against them.  Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has done an outstanding job leading his state through the COVID crisis.  While balancing the economic needs of the people, and keeping the majority of the state functioning and open, DeSantis prioritized protecting the most vulnerable elderly citizens; and then, once available, coordinating the COVID vaccine for that vulnerable population by expediting a massive distribution network to be the first state with over one million doses administered for those who wanted it.  In addition DeSantis allowed local communities to make their own decisions about mask wearing and school opening.

The Deranged 60 Minutes Hit Piece on Ron DeSantis Gives the Game Away.  The left are terrified of Ron DeSantis, and that was never made more apparent than how 60 Minutes chose to handle the supposed "scandals" surrounding Florida's vaccine program.  RedState initially covered the absurdity last night.  As Jennifer Van Laar put it in her write-up, the memo has gone out to destroy DeSantis, facts [notwithstanding].  While 60 Minutes attempted to make it seem like DeSantis had been paid off to allow Publix to host early, pop-up vaccination sites, the truth is much more mundane.  You see, Publix has over 800 locations in Florida and also has large facilities and parking lots, a combination unmatched by smaller stores like CVS and Walgreens.  Further, and more importantly, they were the only major outlet ready to go in January to start distribution.  This is largely due to Publix already taking the lead in delivering millions of flu vaccinations a year.  In other words, they had the systems and infrastructure in place.

CBS lies by omission about Governor Ron DeSantis.  There are two loci of corruption in America:  Academia and the media.  Academia churns out legions of indoctrinated young people, and the media churn out lies.  The latest example is the way that CBS edited a press conference that Florida Governor Ron DeSantis held to make it appear that he had granted vaccination rights to the Publix grocery store chain in exchange for campaign donations.  To the media's dismay, Florida sailed through the COVID panic because it didn't panic.  Governor Ron DeSantis made the logical decision when the disease hit America to protect the vulnerable and to allow all the others in his state to get on with their lives.  To the Democrats' chagrin, at the end of the day, Florida did no worse than the lockdown states, while preserving both its economy and its civil liberties.  Because of his competence, conservatives are turning longing eyes to DeSantis as a possible Republican contender in 2024.  The media, of course, must destroy him.

CBS News Stealth Edits Article Promoting Pure Activism Against Georgia Election Law.  I wrote earlier about a disturbing CBS News tweet and article where they actively encouraged full-on, Democratic activism against the new Georgia election law, as well as other laws they considered to be similar.  They got a lot of backlash for their naked partisanship, and it obviously hit home.  They've since deleted the tweet, but we have it here.  [Tweet]  They also stealth edited the headline as well.  It had been, "3 ways companies can help fight Georgia's restrictive new voting law," taking an active voice.  It was then changed to "Activists are calling on big companies to challenge new voting laws.  Here's what they're asking for."  It still listed the actions people could take against the law — and against Republicans who supported it.  But, too late — we already saw it, and they already tipped their hand; it was pure advocacy, not news.

United Kingdom-based newspapers accuse CBS of 'dishonest misrepresentation' during Oprah interview.  A group of United Kingdom-based newspapers accused CBS of taking headlines out of context during Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's highly publicized tell-all interview with Oprah Winfrey during a "misleading montage" designed to deceive viewers.  Associated Newspapers, publishers of Mail Online, the Daily Mail and The Mail On Sunday, sent a scathing letter to CBS accusing the network of presenting doctored and out-of-context images as headlines during the "Oprah with Meghan and Harry" special Sunday night [3/8/2021].  The letter sent Friday and obtained by Fox News began with CBS' internal messaging about the network putting an emphasis on accuracy and integrity but notes the recent special didn't meet the network's standards.

DAY 5 of Obama TV on CBS: Vacation Pal Gayle King Cheers Michelle.  Tuesday [11/17/2020] was day five of Obama TV.  Also known as CBS This Morning.  Co-host Gayle King, an Obama donor who has vacationed with the family, yet again highlighted the latest on the Democrats.  King cheered the "powerful message" of Mrs. Obama going after Donald Trump again.

Mr. Obama, The 'Strangulation' Victim Is Not George Floyd.  On Sunday, 60 Minutes' resident sycophant, Scott Pelley, walked former president Barack Obama through a racial landscape unrecognizable to those who know the lay of the land, especially readers of The American Spectator.  Pelley kicked off the misdirection with the question, "Did you watch the video of George Floyd's strangulation?"  Yes, strangulation.  Knowing Obama's weakness for racial scare-mongering, I was not at all surprised by his refusal to correct Pelley.  He probably did not know enough to do so in any case.  "Of course," said Obama.  "It was heartbreaking."  He then blathered on about an African-American "reality" that exists only in America's newsrooms.  As to the aftermath of the Floyd death, Obama claimed to have been "heartened and inspired" by the "marches."  He offered not a single word about the stores looted, the buildings burned, the people killed.  Nor did Pelley venture a single question.

We Soon Learn Whether Most Americans Are Any Different From the Masses Who Fell in Line With Hitler and Stalin.  [Scroll down]  Lesley Stahl said a great deal when she told the president she would not ask him about the Hunter Biden laptop because CBS had not independently verified its ownership.  So the biggest scandal imaginable — a corrupt and immoral presidential candidate who leveraged his political positions for half a century to get his family and him rich by compromising the national interest in order to curry favor with our nation's mortal enemies — is kiboshed.  In lockstep Facebook and Twitter will not allow the New York Post to share its extraordinary journalistic breakthrough on the Hunter Biden laptop.  Of course the laptop was Hunter Biden's — the signature on the repair order, the photos within it of him naked in a bathtub, the emails verified by a third party who worked with him.  But they will not tell the story, and they will not allow others to tell it, so half the country's voters do not even know enough about the story to reject it.

Lesley Stahl Is Wrong And Trump Is Right:  The Obama Administration Spied On The Trump Campaign.  Last week, President Trump's team released 38 minutes of unedited video capturing his contentious sit-down with Lesley Stahl of "60 Minutes."  Sunday evening, CBS broadcast clips of the interview and amazingly let air proof of Trump's charge that the media is fake news: "60 Minutes" and Stahl falsely reported that it is "unverified" that the Obama-Biden administration spied on Trump's campaign in 2016.  Trump and not Stahl raised this scandal, as the unedited video showed, after he reversed roles with his interviewer and pushed her to say whether she thought it was okay for Hunter Biden to give "the big guy" a 10 percent cut of money raised by Democratic presidential contender Joe Biden's son in China, and whether it was okay for China to give the Biden family one and a half billion dollars to manage and for Joe to then negotiate with China on behalf of Americans.  "60 Minutes" edited out those details of the Biden scandal, but let the television audience hear Trump say of it, "It's the biggest scan..." before correcting himself, "the second biggest scandal.  The biggest scandal was when they spied on my campaign."

"60 Minutes" Has a History of Running False, Unverified Reports.  This CBS format of "investigation " by buffed-up "reporters" has a long history of peddling fake news.  It falsely reported a problem with the Audi 5000's acceleration, which was not a mechanical problem, but the result of operator failure.  It falsely touted that Alar on apples presented a high health risk.  (Something that the Natural Resources Defense Council had promoted that fattened its coffers).  Based on a forged document, it falsely accused the U.S. Customs Service of facilitating drug trafficking along our southern border and settled with the defamed officer and retracted the story.  In more recent history, Dan Rather used it as a vehicle for promoting fake documents about President George W. Bush's history with the National Guard.

CBS fake Latinos for Trump
Fake News Caught Again — CBS Uses Photo From "Latinos for Trump" as Image for Biden Latino Outreach in Miami.  Good catch.  A sharp twitter user from Arizona noticed this fake news effort.  CBS used a picture from President Trump's "Latino's for Trump" event as a manipulative picture to showcase Joe Biden's Latino outreach effort in Miami.  Those are not Biden Latino supporters in Miami; those are President Trump Latino supporters in Arizona.  [Photos]  The scale of manipulative effort by U.S. media is off the charts.  This is beyond "fake news"; this is a full scale psychological campaign on behalf of U.S. media for their preferred candidate.


CBS reporter tweets about Biden not 'outworking' Trump.  CBS reporter Kathryn Watson questioned why Joe Biden wasn't campaigning more after news broke that the former vice president was not expected to have public events Saturday [9/12/2020].  "Not sure why Biden isn't doing more to show he can outwork Trump," Watson tweeted Saturday in response to Politico reporter Jake Sherman announcing a lid had been called in Wilmington, Del., meaning no events for Biden.  "And yes I realize there's a pandemic and he shouldn't be out shaking hands.  But he has a team of experienced people at his disposal to think up creative ways to campaign safely," she added.

CBS Claims Riots in Rochester 'Largely Peaceful'.  As I reported on Friday night, thousands of BLM rioted in Rochester last night.  By one count, there were 5,500 people in the street.  But they upped their attacks a bit tonight [9/5/2020].  They not only smashed windows and set things on fire; they stormed into the restaurants demanding the businesses shut down, smashing dishes, overturning tables, threatening and intimidating diners, some of whom fled in terror in some very disturbing videos.  [Video clips]  The BLM are literally the fascists of whom they complain: intimidating people and bashing businesses like the Red Guard or the Brown Shirts.  BLM also attacked the police, throwing projectiles and fireworks at them.

'CBS wants a race war': Outlet slammed for headline saying police killed black man while leaving out he reportedly fired first.  CBS News drew criticism Wednesday for a headline on a story involving police shooting and killing a black man without mentioning the man allegedly opened fire first.  "Deputies kill half-brother of black man found hanged in park," a CBS headline posted on Twitter Wednesday read, referring to the death of Terron Jammal Boone.  Boone was the half-brother of Robert Fuller, a black man found hanging in a park on June 10 in what was first believed to be a suicide before the coroner walked back that conclusion.  The tweet doesn't include the police report that states officers attempted to stop Boone, who was wanted for kidnapping, spousal assault, and assault with a deadly weapon, at which point he jumped out of his vehicle and opened fire on officers before they shot and killed him.

CBS Deceptively Edits Barr Interview, Leaving Out Key Details On Violent Riots, Police Oversight.  Key details on violent riots near the White House were removed from the broadcast of an interview of Attorney General William Barr on CBS News' "Face The Nation" Sunday.  Anchor Margaret Brennan repeatedly described protests as "peaceful" and the clearing of protesters to set up a stronger perimeter as unnecessarily rushed, contentions Barr strongly denied.  Left out of the interview that aired on CBS on Sunday morning [6/7/2020] was Barr's detailed accounting of much of the violent context of that perimeter expansion, including that "bricks and inflammable liquid" were being thrown at police in Lafayette Square near the White House as rioters "were trying to get entry" over the fences, the five dozen officers guarding Lafayette Square who were "lost" the night prior in the violence, and the individuals who at the time of their forced dispersal "wrestled with the police officers trying to tear their shields from them, in one case, struggling to get one of the police officer's guns."

AG Barr:  Protesters In D.C. 'Were Not Peaceful,' Hundreds Of Officers Injured, Media Promoting 'Big Lies'.  Attorney General William Barr disputed many claims made by the mainstream media about last week's riots during an interview on Sunday, saying that the media has been telling the American public "big lies" about what is going on at the allegedly peaceful protests, and that there have been "750 officers hurt in the last week."  "On Monday, Lafayette Park was cleared of protesters," CBS News host Margaret Brennan said.  "The federal agents who were there report up to you.  Did you think it was appropriate for them to use smoke bombs, tear gas, pepper balls, projectiles at what appeared to be peaceful protesters?"  "They were not peaceful protesters," Barr said.  "And that's one of the big lies that the media seems to be perpetuating at this point."

James O'Keefe:  CBS Faked a Line of Cars to Make Corona Tests Seem Harder to Get.  Did CBS fake a line of cars in Michigan in order to make it seem like COVID-19 testing was even more difficult?  That's what Project Veritas creator James O'Keefe asserts in a new video.  Footage of the May 1 CBS This Morning shows a long line of vehicles waiting for drive-by testing in Michigan.  According to O'Keefe, "A CBS News crew pulled medical professionals off the floor at the Cherry Medical Center in Grand Rapids, Michigan, to line up in their vehicles so a CBS film crew would have a long line for their COVID-19 coverage."  O'Keefe talked to an anonymous witness in Grand Rapids who alleged that CBS "told us that medical personnel were taken away from treating patients and making the line longer for actual patients wait for the COVID-19 test."

Trump Unloads On Media During Coronavirus Briefing.  President Donald Trump took the fight directly to the media this week, playing a video of all of their poor coverage of the coronavirus outbreak and showing all of the steps the Trump administration has taken to try to mitigate the pandemic.  CNN accused the president of playing "propaganda," while CBS News' Paula Reid falsely claimed that the administration had a "gap" where they didn't take any action in February.

A dishonest report from CBS's 60 Minutes on the medical mask shortage.  CBS, the network that brought us the crying nurse with mental health issues who didn't understand hospital procedures, and the two, count 'em, two, video instances of Italian hospital mayhem to make phony claims about chaos at New York and Pennsylvania hospitals in the coronavirus pandemic, has now put out another whopper.  This time, it's a 60 Minutes segment about mask and personal protective equipment shortages at a New York City hospital, which, its report argues, is all Trump's fault.

CBS learns nothing after [having been] busted for fake footage, replays same Italy hospital scene reporting on Philly.  CBS News used fake hospital footage in a coronavirus story and followed up with an explanation for the "editing mistake" after getting caught.  But apparently the network learned nothing and amazingly used the exact same footage again after claiming it would be removing the deceptive video "from all platforms and shows."  In a news story about New York City hospitals which aired on March 25, CBS News used footage from an Italian hospital which had already appeared in a Sky News report on March 22.

The Editor says...
It sounds like CBS is willfully dishonest in its continued use of this fake news footage.  But having worked in TV broadcasting most of my life, I think abject incompetence is a more likely explanation.  Broadcast stations today are full of lazy millenials who don't care much about accuracy, and each of them has their "own truth."  Chance are, there was a memo sent out to delete the misleading footage, and less than 100 percent of the writers and editors paid attention to it.  That's how things get on the air that weren't supposed to be on the air.  On the other hand, the people at CBS may also be dishonest, lazy, or determined to advance a left-wing agenda by any means.

CBS News Goes Full Fake but Accurate With Correction on Viral Crying Nurse Video.  Several days ago, CBS News tweeted out a now-viral video of a nurse crying over not being able to wear a mask.  The description made it sound as if her hospital had run out of or outright denied her use of protective equipment.  The indication was clear.  This was Trump's fault because doctors and nurses aren't getting the supplies they need.  [Video clip]  In a word, the description of the video and the situation have now been exposed as nonsense.  The background of the woman who made the video has also come under serious, relevant scrutiny.

Jussie Smollett in Scrubs:  CBS Story of Crying Nurse Who Claimed No COVID-19 Protection Just Crumbled.  CBS News has picked up the story of the woman who claims her hospital gave her no protection to take care of COVID-19 patients.  But CBS News apparently didn't check the story because, as they say, it was too good to check.  Imaris Vera, part-time nurse and part-time Instagram model, claims she quit her job at a Chicago area hospital — still unnamed — because the hospital didn't provide nurses with proper equipment around COVID-19 patients.  All we've heard is howls from governors and CDC officials for us not to take away gear from first responders.  Save the PPE and the N-95 masks for the pros.  So at first blush, the story looked like it might be true.  Then it started crumbling.

CBS News Posts Fraudulent Viral Video of Sobbing ICU Nurse Who Quit Her Job Over Poor Working Conditions, Mask Shortage — It Was All a Lie.  CBS News was caught once again posting a fraudulent video to make it look like President Trump is failing in his response to the Coronavirus pandemic. [...] CBS on Sunday morning [4/5/2020] posted a video of a "nurse in tears" who says she quit her job after she was asked to work in a Coronavirus ICU without a face mask:  "America is not prepared, and nurses are not being protected." [...] It turns out the woman is indeed a nurse, however she took time off to pursue a blogging/'social media influencer' career.  She went back to work as a nurse for ONE DAY, then quit.

CBS News Caught Using Footage from an Italian Hospital to Describe Conditions in New York City.  This is footage from SKY News on March 22 from Italy.  [Video clip]  And here is footage from CBS News during their New York City report on March 25.  [Identical video clip]

Scott Pelley Leads 60 Minutes Impeachment Coverage With Lie:  "Whistleblower Under Federal Protection".  CBS Reporter Scott Pelley led the broadcast of 60-Minutes presentation of the House impeachment of Donald Trump with a stunning claim:  [Video clip]  The claim is quite something.  A CIA operative that needs to be put under federal protection?  Wow.  Immediately CNN and the media pounced on the opportunity to promote the "whistleblower" as a victim. [...] Except, they encountered one problem:  it's not true.  Scott Pelley made it up.  Even one of the lawyers for the CIA whistleblower, Mark S. Zaid, had to try and clean up CBS's false narrative:  "60 Minutes completely misinterpreted the contents of our letter."

Whistleblower's attorney says '60 Minutes' misinterpreted letter in federal protection report.  An attorney for the whistleblower in the Trump-Ukraine scandal said Sunday [9/29/2019] that CBS' "60 Minutes" had "completely misinterpreted" a document from his legal group, after the news outlet tweeted that the whistleblower was now under federal protection.  On Sunday night, CBS wrote on Twitter: "'60 Minutes' has obtained a letter that indicates the government whistleblower who set off the impeachment inquiry of President Trump is under federal protection because they fear for their safety."  Two hours later, following significant reaction to the report, Attorney Mark Zaid responded:  "NEWS ALERT: 60 Minutes completely misinterpreted contents of our letter, which is now published online."

Vaccine injury
Mom Catches CBS Using Image of Her Vaccine-Injured Child, Falsely Claiming Measles Caused It.  For months now, the Free Thought Project has been reporting on the hype and utter hysteria being pushed by the government and the media alike in regards to the 2019 measles situation.  It started in January as mainstream media and social media giants began begging for the government to silence those who advocate for vaccine safety and it came to a head on Tuesday as New York began force vaccinating citizens and charging those who resisted it with a crime.


CBS Rewrites History:  The Polls Weren't Wrong in 2016.  CBS attempted to rewrite history on Monday with This Morning co-host Norah O'Donnell and network Director of Elections Anthony Salvanto declaring that the polls in 2016 weren't wrong.  That might be a surprise to anyone who trusted the numbers in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania.  Helping Salvanto promote his new book on polling, O'Donnell wondered:  "People said that proved that the polls were wrong.  But were they?"  "No," he declared.  O'Donnell cheered the revisionist history:  "Yes, thank you!  Anthony, explain to everybody!"  Using the benefit of hindsight, Salvanto lectured:  "All the signs were there."

Enemies of the People?  The modern era of fake news began with George W. Bush's election in 2000.  In September 2004, less than two months before the Bush-Kerry election, the high priest of fake news — Cronkite's successor, Dan Rather — aired a 60 Minutes report which contended that President Bush got into the Texas Air National Guard because of political influence and that his officer evaluation reports gave him high marks despite his shirking of his duty.  This was an obvious attempt to damage Bush's candidacy and interfere in the election.  Within hours of the report, it became entirely clear that Rather's report was based entirely on forged documents.  CBS and Rather later issued a half-apology.  Such "reports," attempting interference in elections, has become the norm for the American media and most of the world's.

More about Rathergate.

Muslim gets life for killing Denver transit guard who was also a pastor.  Despite the evidence, the media refuses to headline their articles with the truth.  That's why they are rightfully called fake news.  CBS and many others titled it "Ex-soldier" instead of "Muslim jihadist."

I Got Your Fake News Right Here.  In the interest of transparency, and to assist CBS, I have compiled the ultimate list of #FakeNews stories that have circulated over the last decade or two:
  •   They told us that allowing law-abiding citizens to carry concealed weapons would turn our streets into rivers of blood. #FakeNews
  •   They told us that taking trillions of dollars and giving it to those "who truly needed it" would eradicate poverty. #FakeNews
  •   They told us that giving home loans to those who couldn't afford them would make the American dream achievable for all. #FakeNews
  •   They told us that letting the federal government run our health care system — and those of our veterans — would reduce premiums and make care accessible for all. #FakeNews
  •   They told us that allowing millions of unvetted third-worlders — from gang-bangers to professional moochers — would make America safer. #FakeNews
  •   They told us that allowing teachers to unionize in public schools would help inner city students reach for the stars. #FakeNews
[...]
  •   They told us that slathering welfare payments and food stamps around in record numbers would help the economy. #FakeNews

CBS radio report created the impression Chicago torture victim was a black man assaulted by white Trump supporters.  This may be the single most despicable act of media bias I have ever encountered.  It took a lot of effort and art for CBS Radio to put together an early report on the Chicago torture incident that was strictly factual, yet created the impression on listeners that a group of white Trump supporters had attacked a helpless mentally challenged black man.  Mediaite provides a transcript of what was reported last Thursday morning by a top-of-the hour broadcst distributed to radio stations across the country.

CBS Takes Spin to a New Level of Deception After Chicago Torture Outrage.  The media has been hyping a contrived narrative that since the election there has been a wave of hate crimes against groups beloved by liberals:  blacks, Muslims, sexual deviants, et cetera.  Until now their evidence has consisted mainly of hate hoaxes, but this time an appalling racially motivated crime really did occur.  CBS listeners would never guess that this crime was committed by four blacks against a white kid.

CBS Radio Deceptively Implies Chicago Torturers Were White Trump Supporters, Victim Was Black.  A CBS Radio News report on the video of four young Chicago people torturing a mentally disabled man falsely implied that the victim was black and his attackers were white, when in fact the opposite was true.

Spike In Immigrants Illegally Crossing Into US Ahead Of Election.  Experts told CBS News the number of immigrants crossing the border won't drop after Election Day.

The Editor says...
In other words, the headline is misleading and deceptive.

CBS lies about yet another police shooting.  On Tuesday September 20, 2016, The Talk, on CBS showed some video of a guy being shot by police near Tulsa OK.  They showed him with his hands up, and they showed him after he was shot.  They made no mention of the fact that, after the police told him to stand still, he kept walking toward his truck.  They EDITED OUT the part of the video that showed the guy reaching into his truck, which of course is why the police shot him; he looked like he was reaching for a gun.  And of course the hostesses expressed outrage about the police shooting a guy with his hands up and "not making any kind of threatening gesture in any way" and how it's yet another example of "blacks being killed by racist cops."  I rather doubt that the hostesses have ever heard the true story of that incident.

CBS Misleadingly Suggests Clinton Emails Marked 'C' Not Actually 'Classified'.  On CBS This Morning on Monday [9/5/2016], at the end of a report recalling the notes the FBI released which document that Hillary Clinton claimed not to know that "(C)" markings in her emails indicated classified information at the level of "confidential," CBS correspondent Nancy Cordes misleadingly gave the impression that confidential emails are not classified as she made a point of correcting Donald Trump for mis-stating that the "(C)" stood for "classified."  A bit later, as House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi appeared as a guest and similarly suggested that "confidential" information is not classified, CBS substitute host Josh Elliott seemed to accept her claim.

CBS Muslim Panel Accidentally Includes Professional Leftist Obama Operative.  CBS's Frank Luntz sought to gauge the attitudes of an ostensibly ordinary panel of Muslims in America towards Donald Trump.  Undeclared to the audience, however, is a professional left-wing agitator seated in the front row who is an alumnus of the Obama Administration.  Linda Sarsour, an anti-American hater of Israel, Islamic supremacist, and regular commentator on left-wing media, was not identified as such when offering her views on Trump.  Rather, she was presented as an ordinary Muslim in America.

Also posted under Media bias in favor of Islam.

CBS employee goes silent after making baseless fraud charge about embattled Indiana pizzeria.  An employee of a Virginia-based CBS News affiliate has gone silent following revelations Friday [4/3/2015] she made a baseless fraud charge against an attempt to raise funds for an Indiana family at the center of a political battle over religious freedom.

In LA, CBS Station Pretends There Was a Real Kwanzaa Parade Yesterday.  A Kwanzaa "parade" was held in Los Angeles yesterday [12/26/2014].  In reporting on the event, CBS Los Angeles published a work of fiction which absolutely belongs on any 2014 list of most embarrassing moments in journalism. [...] A procession of a few vehicles lasting 10 minutes is not a "parade."  It isn't even a motorcade.

CBS News Fabricates Story That Michigan Bill Would Allow Doctors/EMTs to Deny Treatment to Gay Patients.  CBS News published a story on December 11 under the headline:  "Bill would let Michigan doctors, EMTs refuse to treat gay patients."  CBS News reports: [...] According to Michael W. McConnell, a professor at Stanford University Law School and former federal appeals court judge, the CBS story is false.  "The exact same law has been on the books at the federal level and in many states for almost twenty years, and no such claim has ever been made.  And if it were made, it would lose in court, probably unanimously," McConnell tells The Weekly Standard in an email.

CBS dubs sound for quiet electric car.  CBS News says an editor made an "audio error" in dubbing the sound of a loud traditional car engine over footage of the much quieter Tesla electric car in a story that aired Sunday [3/30/2014].

CBS's Mellody Hobson, Whose Husband George Lucas Is Worth $7 Billion, Slams Rich CEOs.  CBS analyst Mellody Hobson, whose husband George Lucas is worth $7.3 billion, appeared on This Morning to slam excessive salaries for corporate bosses.

CBS's Bob Schieffer Falsely Claims 'Polls Say That Most People Favor' ObamaCare.  In defiance of reality illustrated in numerous polls, on Sunday's Face the Nation, host Bob Schieffer scolded Republican Congresswoman Marsha Blackburn when she correctly asserted "there is only partisan support" for ObamaCare.  Schieffer cut her off:  "Well now Congresswoman, that's not entirely true.  The polls don't suggest that.  Polls say that most people favor it."

Fake News from CBS.  In 2002 the Guerilla News Network published a piece written by staffers from a group called PR Watch.  They said that "For years CBS (and all the other networks) have run fake news stories in the form of video news releases."  What's more, the article, "CBS sells fake news," went on to announce that CBS also had gone into the business of creating, producing and distributing so-called "fake news."

'48 Hours' apologizes for altered image.  The executive producer of CBS's "48 Hours Mystery" has apologized for airing an altered image of the front page of the Tribune in an episode about the murder trial of Ryan Ferguson that aired Saturday night [2/18/2006].


The Atlantic

The Media Are the Scum of the Earth.  The Atlantic is a prime example of how the left-wing echo chamber operates.  They "report" a piece about a upcoming book, working hard to make sure their fellow travelers make some cash, and declare Donald Trump has a history of praising Adolf Hitler and his generals.  Weird how this tidbit of information about the most investigate human being on the planet escaped reporting for 4 years, but now someone finally decided to tell it!  That person is John Kelly, a retired partisan General who was fired at Trump's Chief of Staff and has been scrambling to worm his way back into the good graces of the establishment left ever since.  Kelly started by spreading lies about Trump declaring soldiers who died in the D-Day invasion "suckers" and "losers."  He's the only person claiming this, likely the source who "leaked" it to The Atlantic in 2020.

The Race That No One Can Win.  For a while I thought the Democrats were persecuting Trump, believing that it would keep him in the headlines, arouse sympathy among Republicans, and lead to the GOP nominating its weakest candidate.  Now I think they just can't help themselves.  ["]The Democratic and media resistance, for its part, appears readier even than in 2016 to count Mr. Trump a would-be dictator rather than a legitimate political figure.  An edition of the Atlantic was given to the question of Mr. Trump's dictatorial propensities.  In the Washington Post Robert Kagan wrote a 6,000-word essay contending that a second-term Mr. Trump won't be checked by countervailing institutions and so will become America's first dictator.["]  This is profoundly stupid.  The president does not have dictatorial powers, and he cannot simply announce "I am a dictator."  And in any event, we have four years of experience of Trump as president, and he was the least authoritarian of recent chief executives.  It was Barack Obama who exercised power most illegitimately by issuing illegal executive orders.

General Milley's Own Private Constitution.  [A recent] article serves up the usual, proclaiming Trump an existential threat to Mom and apple pie, never mind democracy, all without details or explanation.  Readers of the Atlantic just know it is true and the author, Jeffrey Goldberg, sees no reason to expand on the idea.  The real danger here is not poor journalism (we're used to it) but the promotion of the idea that Trump is inherently dangerous and, without men like General Milley willing to warp the Constitution, we will all die in some Trumpian nuclear hissy fit. [...] A healthy portion of the Atlantic article details what Milley felt was Trump's disrespect for the military (Trump's deferments but not Biden's are mentioned.) The Atlantic's Jeffery Goldberg writes. "Milley's family venerated the military, and Trump's attitude toward the uniformed services seemed superficial, callous, and, at the deepest human level, repugnant."

A Cautionary Note to Antifa and BLM Thugs Contemplating "Civil War".  "Civil war" has been a term much in use by both the Left and the Right these days.  Try a web search on "civil war in America 2020," and the result is dozens/hundreds of links to commentators speculating about the "coming war between Left and Right and who will ignite the spark" (and a lot of other related themes).  The Left claim that "white supremacist and white nationalist militias" will get things started, and the legacy media have produced dozens of articles "investigating" militias and propagating that false narrative.  One of the latest investigative reports on Oath Keepers and militias along those lines was published in the November issue of The Atlantic.  It conveys the leftwing view of militias:  crazy, fringe, gun-toting elements itching to start a civil war, and whom polite society should shun (and then disarm at the very least).

The Atlantic gave Ruth Shalit a 'second chance' 25 years after a journalism scandal.  It ended with an ugly correction.  Two weeks after publishing a long, juicy and instantly viral story about the world of competitive niche sports and the wealthy parents who push their children to play them, the Atlantic on late Friday [10/30/2020] appended a nearly 800-word editor's note informing readers that it was "deceived" by the story's author, Ruth Shalit Barrett.  In particular, the magazine said Barrett incorrectly asserted that the story's main character, who was identified by her middle name (Sloane), had a son in addition to three daughters in an attempt to blur her identity, and gave a misleading and highly exaggerated description of a fencing injury allegedly sustained by the woman's daughter.  The author had described the incident at a 2019 competition as a "massacre," in which the girl was stabbed in the neck; in the Atlantic's updated version of the story, the injury is now portrayed as "not severe."

Atlantic 'Editor's Note' Adds New Layers To The Magazine's Unethical Journalism Standard.  On Friday [10/30/2020] The Atlantic issued what the magazine is calling an "Editor's Note."  It's a strange way to spin what the note actually was: an admission that it published a "BS" story and has a staggeringly low standard of ethics.  The article, titled "The Mad, Mad World of Niche Sports Among Ivy League-Obsessed Parents," which is set to appear in the November issue of the print magazine, purports to explore the unhealthy dynamic of parents who push their children into niche sports accompanied by absurd athletic regimens in order to secure elite educational opportunities through scholarships and status.  The problem is that not everyone in the story was exactly who he or she claimed to be.  This shouldn't have been too surprising for The Atlantic to learn, for the author of the piece has a record of journalistic malfeasance.

Fact Check:  Michelle Obama Repeats 'Suckers and Losers' Claim in Video for Joe Biden.  CLAIM: Former First Lady Michelle Obama claimed President Donald Trump calls fallen soldiers "suckers" and "losers."  VERDICT: FALSE.  The Atlantic story's claim has never been corroborated, and it never even talked about all fallen soldiers.

Atlantic Issues Correction Undermining Entire Piece Promoting Tri-Parenting.  The Atlantic issued a correction Thursday [9/24/2020] to a piece published on Tuesday outlining the apparent rise in tri-parenting arrangements and chronicling the path of an asexual activist in northern California who started a family with another married couple without dating.  In an effort to normalize tri-parent cohorts, the piece first misreported that less than half of American children were living in two-parent homes, based on a Pew Research Center study that stated the opposite. [...] The 6-year-old study from the Pew Research Center however, showed that 46 percent of these children were living with two heterosexual parents in their first marriage.  Another 15 percent reported living in two-parent homes where either one or both had been remarried bringing the total to 61 percent, far more than half.

The Trump Scandal Absorption Level Has Been Reached.  [Scroll down]  The Atlantic story is (sputtering), "Yeah, Trump was out there, and he said that dead soldiers, he has no respect for 'em!  They're losers and suckers!" Okay, and then that doesn't work.  It looks like it might work for the first couple of days, and then here comes the exculpatory evidence and it begins to fade. [...] Well, wait.  Wait.  What happened to The Atlantic story?  "Oh, nothing to see there."  No, no, no!  What do you mean, "Nothing to see there"?  You sponsored a lie.  You brought forth a lie.  You've done nothing but lie.  The mainstream media and the Democrat Party has mounted one lie after another, one allegation after another, and nothing ever comes of any of them.  And yet every week, there's a new one.  As though what happened yesterday didn't happen.

Atlantic Reporter Falsely Claims Trump Campaign Mocked Biden At Beau's Grave.  Vice President Joe Biden once again dodged questions from the press Sunday, walking from Mass to his motorcade while a pool reporter yelled "Mr. Vice President, come back to us!"  Biden dodging media interactions is not surprising, even if it is very strange for a modern political campaign.  What is unusual are some of the people who are defending his dodging of reporters and difficult questions, among them The Atlantic's Edward-Isaac Dovere, who claimed Biden was visiting his son's grave and shamed the President Donald Trump's campaign for criticizing Biden.  Worse still than flacking for Biden when he is supposed to be reporting on his campaign, is that there's no evidence Dovere's version of events happened at all.

Dan Rather tries a variation on "fake but accurate".  Jeffrey Goldberg's claim that President Trump disparaged American soldiers who died in Normandy is collapsing. [...] Dan Rather inadvertently provides further evidence that Goldberg's claim is falling apart.  Earlier, as we noted, Rather tweeted that the story had seemingly been "confirmed" by other sources.  Now, Rather is falling back on a variation of "fake but accurate" — the "defense" of Rather's 2004 story about George W. Bush's military service.  "Whether [Trump] said it or not, it is believable," Rather told callers to a show he was hosting.  Later, Rather cited the "terrible things" Trump said about Senator John McCain.  But Trump had a beef with McCain, whom he regarded as a rival and then a foe.  Trump often disparages rivals and foes.  There is no pattern of him disparaging bystanders, much less brave soldiers who have been dead for many decades.  In any case, the standard in journalism shouldn't be whether a story is believable, but whether it is supported by non-fabricated evidence.

Journalism Is Dead.  [Scroll down]  Last week the Atlantic, the magazine that represents the last refuge of goody-goody Liberalism in America, published an assault on Donald Trump.  After years of claims that he has, among other things, colluded with the Russians, boasted of touching women where they go to the bathroom, and other claims that have all been refuted, the Atlantic has settled on a new charge.  The president has disparaged our World War I dead.  Moreover, he did it two years ago.  Yes, the fact-checkers at the Atlantic have spent two years verifying the factuality of this story so they could get it just right.  And now it is ready to see the light of day just weeks before the election.  It was close, but they made it.

The Biden Slime Operation.  In terms of political ethics and tactics, the Democrats have hit rock bottom.  The Atlantic has worked hard to become a third-rate New Yorker in terms both of literary quality and the vitriol of its hatred for President Trump; the magazine has probably confirmed its position with the confection of the uncorroborated and totally implausible allegation that Trump disparaged American World War I veterans who died in France as "suckers" and "losers."  It is impossible that any such statement was made by him.  He is a proud graduate of the New York Military Academy, and while he was happy to invoke a minor bone-chip in his foot as reason enough not to enter the military during the Vietnam era, that does not disqualify him as an admirer and supporter of the U.S. Armed Forces.

Pre-Election Dirty Tricks:  Ignore, Refute, or Pivot?  It sounds unlikely but the most appalling instance of journalistic malpractice last week was not when The Atlantic published anonymous allegations that President Trump disparaged American troops behind closed doors — it was Joe Biden's so-called press conference following another shaky, rambling, and dishonest speech disguised as a "campaign event."  Rather than jump at the chance to grill the Democratic nominee for president after weeks of his refusing to take questions with no objection from the press, reporters delicately pitched one softball after another to the frail candidate.  Biden opened the event with a direct reference to The Atlantic article.  "If what is written in The Atlantic is true, it's disgusting," Biden fumed.  "It affirms what most of us believe to be true, that Donald Trump is not fit to do the job of president, to be the commander in chief."  The gaggle in attendance eagerly took his cue.  The first "question" [...] went to a scribe from none other than The Atlantic, who prompted Biden to opine about the "president's soul and the life he leads."  Follow-up teasers opened the door for Biden to rant about QAnon, face coverings, Attorney General William Barr, and mail-in voting.

3 Crucial Breakdowns In Journalistic Standards That Explain The Atlantic's Trump Political Hit Piece.  For Washington staffers and politicos, a day off on Monday creeps into a half-day on Friday ("to beat the traffic"), which seeps into an early Thursday ("packing for the trip").  Among this sizable set of folks stretching from the Hill to its consultants to their non-profits, Labor Day is half-sacred.  The lazy, end-of-summer weekend away took a broadside Thursday night, however, when The Atlantic's Jeffrey Goldberg published a badly sourced, difficult-to-confirm, belief-stretching story about President Donald Trump denigrating America's honored dead at Belleau Woods, France.  The political motivation of the accusations was laid bare by early Friday morning when MSNBC debuted a political attack ad based on the piece that was prepared in a deeply suspicious record time.  The trap was set — and poor adherence to journalistic practices made it all possible.  Throughout the long weekend, skeptical journalists cast serious doubts on the Goldberg's standards and methods, and on what passes today as "confirmation," but for those outside the media industry it's a he-said-she-said with potentially serious political consequences for the president.

Keep Your Dirty Keyboard Paws Off My President.  [Scroll down]  And now the latest, that Trump berated our brave and heroic fallen.  They sat on this supposed "bombshell" for two years.  Only now it becomes news?  How does one defend by proving a negative?  If someone says that, as this article was being written, the author was cursing Jews, how does this rabbi prove it a lie?  John Bolton, who hates Trump deeply, nonetheless says it never happened.  Trump and Bolton and others remember the day and the warnings and advice the president was given that the skies were too foggy for his helicopter to travel. [...] One looks at Trump's record on the military and on veterans' affairs, his focused commitment and fulfillment of his promise to rebuild the military, to markedly increase military pay, to transmogrify the Bureau of Veterans Affairs and to get our veterans the best health care available.  Did he denigrate our fallen soldiers?  If he did, in private and while behind closed doors — and all direct in-person evidence says he did not — does it even matter with a four-year presidential record like his?  And it is hard to believe, if not impossible.

US Army vet says he was used as a 'prop' in anti-Trump 'propaganda'.  One U.S. wounded veteran is speaking out against his image being used across all social media platforms to further perpetuate a story he believes is false and made up by Democrats for political gain.  "I'm just so irritated that they put my image up there because now it looks like the president called me a loser."  Bobby Henline, a four-tour Iraq War veteran told Fox News referring to comments allegedly made by the president regarding wounded veterans.  "And they're using that to sell something that they believe in for their agenda.  It's not fair to put us [veterans] as props in the middle of all that[.]"

How the Atlantic twisted the truth.  The Atlantic has stunk up an otherwise beautiful Labor Day weekend with a uniquely ugly story.  Anti-Trump editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg claims that Donald Trump snubbed a World War One American cemetery in France because 'it's filled with losers', and the Doughboys buried there are 'suckers'. Goldberg also asserts that 'Trump rejected the idea of the visit because he feared his hair would become disheveled in the rain' on November 10, 2018. [...] Goldberg cites 'four people with firsthand knowledge of the discussion that day' — all anonymous.  In contrast, at least 11 named members of Trump's Paris team corroborate him.  So does an email from an unidentified military aide.  So do the weather data.  Trump's next-day agenda also discredits the Atlantic.

Atlantic Editor Admits Key Detail of Anti-Trump Hit Piece May Be Untrue.  Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, admitted that a key detail of his article about Trump could be wrong during an interview with CNN on Sunday [9/6/2020]. [...] At least fifteen Trump administration officials who were with Trump on that trip have now disputed the Atlantic report, including former national security adviser John Bolton.  FOIA documents have also definitively proved that Trump's visit to the cemetery was canceled due to weather.  When Goldberg was asked about evidence that the cancelation was due to inclement weather, he admitted that it was likely true.  "I'm sure all of those things are true," he told CNN.

The Atlantic Hoax is Dead — Bring on the Next Hoax!  The Atlantic's "Trump hates the military" hoax died on the vine after about a 24-hour run.  It died for the simple reason that Trump's public actions consistently in favor of the interests of the U.S. military and its personnel and retirees rendered the anonymously-sourced hit piece transparently unbelievable to anyone with functioning synapses in their cranial cavity, which of course excludes China Joe Biden.  The obvious hope of the Biden/Harris campaign and its corrupt media toadies was that this particular hoax would lead thousands of Trump supporters to finally abandon him out of disgust.  Yeah, that's not going to happen.

Desperately Derailing Donald.  [Scroll down]  The point is, in Jussie Smollett fashion, the demand for scandals is outrunning the supply and time grows short.  It's no wonder that one of Joe Biden's largest campaign contributors, billionaire Laurene Jobs of the Apple fortune, who owns most of The Atlantic, had the former Obama Administration megaphone Jeffrey Goldberg exhume a two-year-old and long-ago-refuted charge that President Trump did not wish to visit a U.S. military cemetery in France because he variously was afraid of the rain, that he would get his hair wet, and that he did not wish to celebrate "losers" and "suckers."  All this was from a left-wing media that not long ago damned a "militaristic" Trump for being infatuated with generals, and putting far too many in his White House, while needlessly spending billions on manpower and equipment to repair a military hollowed out by the Obama Administration.  The resuscitated scandal hit-piece was primed for all the left-wing cable news shows and supposedly would dominate the otherwise quiet Labor Day weekend news.  The problem was that the charge was calcified — and for a reason.  Security memos long ago had shown that the weather, not Trump, had deterred low-flying presidential helicopters.

'This Never Happened': Sources Close To Trump Rally To His Defense Over Atlantic Story.  President Donald Trump was quick to deny a recent report from The Atlantic, which alleged that he had said a number of disrespectful things about fallen American service members — and in the days that followed, a number of others have gone on record to support him.  Trump claimed that the story had been invented to help The Atlantic "gain some relevance." [...] First Lady Melania Trump made a rare public statement as well, saying that the story was "not true" and adding, "It has become a very dangerous time when anonymous sources are believed above all else, & no one knows their motivation.  This is not journalism — It is activism.  And it is a disservice to the people of our great nation."

The Stunning Synergy of The Atlantic's Anonymous Attack on Trump.  The Atlantic published a story Thursday evening [9/3/2020] that claimed President Donald Trump called the fallen American soldiers in a World War I cemetery "suckers" and "losers" in 2018.  The author, Jeffrey Goldberg, cited four anonymous sources.  Nearly a dozen current and former Trump administration officials disputed the story.  One, notably, was John Bolton, the former national security adviser who says he will not vote for Trump.  "I was there," he said, and "I didn't hear that."

Zach Fuentes, Top Aide to John Kelly, Denies Atlantic Story About Trump.  Former Deputy White House Chief of Staff Zach Fuentes denied to Breitbart News The Atlantic's account of President Donald Trump's comments about troops in Europe.  Fuentes unequivocally denied The Atlantic's report last week, a huge blow to the establishment media narrative.  Fuentes personally briefed President Trump on the weather situation that led to the trip being canceled.  He is also a close personal confidante of former White House Chief of Staff John Kelly.

Left-Wing Media Have Jumped the Shark.  Instead of reporting on real issues, the media are running wild with the latest Trump attack piece in the far-left magazine, The Atlantic.  It is owned by liberals, managed by liberals, staffed by liberals, and read by liberals.  Despite the bias, the media are now treating The Atlantic as a paragon of objective journalism.  Of course, The Atlantic article was pure garbage, filled with anonymous sources, spouting an anti-Trump message right before an election.  The aim of the article was strictly to harm the president's re-election prospects.  In contrast, numerous people from the Trump White House have gone on the record to vehemently deny the salacious accusations in the article.  For real journalists, public denials should outweigh anonymous accusations, but, alas, they are extinct.  The ridiculous theme of the article was that the president hated the military and those who have been wounded and killed in combat.  Such an accusation is preposterous.  Instead, the president has given our military service members a massive pay raise, reformed the Veterans Administration, and totally rebuilt our national defenses.

U.S. Ambassador to France Denies The Atlantic Story.  U.S. Ambassador to France and Monaco Jamie McCourt told Breitbart News exclusively on Monday [9/7/2020] that the Atlantic story about President Donald Trump allegedly bashing troops is untrue.  Ambassador McCourt was there the day President Trump's team called off the trip to the cemetery at Belleau Wood because of inclement weather.  She is the latest U.S. official who was actually present at the event to publicly deny the Atlantic's account of events, which is based entirely on anonymous sources.

Sharyl Attkisson Warns:  Prepare for the 'Scheduled Scandals' Dropping Before November.  If anyone was surprised by the nonsensical lie being pushed by The Atlantic, they shouldn't have been.  The story, from "anonymous sources" claimed that President Donald Trump didn't want to visit an American cemetery in France because he said dead military members "losers" and "suckers."  Anyone reading that would know it was fake and it was immediately debunked from all quarters by people willing to go on the record.  But it sounded a lot more like the offensive way that the left depicts the military.  The fact that such an obviously false story would be pushed shows how desperate they are at this point.  It's also pretty clear that one big font of support for the president and the GOP in general is the military.  Consequently, Democrats have to find some way to unhinge that support.  It's 60 days before the election.  Democrats and their willing acolytes in the media have already shown that they are willing to do anything they possibly can to win back the White House.

Shades of Dan Rather in Jeffrey Goldberg's Anti-Trump Hit Piece.  Should we believe the story, reported by the Atlantic's editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg, that President Trump made disparaging comments about American soldiers who died in Normandy?  I don't.  Trump has a very nasty side, but I doubt he made the nasty comments Goldberg's attributes to him.  For one thing, it's not Trump's practice to disparage people who haven't disparaged him.  Sure, he expressed a lack of respect for John McCain's war heroism.  But that was because McCain was a political enemy.  Trump has no beef with soldiers who died in Normandy many decades ago.  Moreover, John Bolton, who was present when Trump supposedly made his disparaging comments, says it didn't happen.

Evidence piles up that the phony Atlantic story about Trump and troops was a slime job to boost Biden.  To get a sense of how low the Biden campaign is going to go in its quest to oust President Trump, the Atlantic hit job from Thursday is a pretty good indicator.  The evidence is piling up that the easily refutable, anonymously sourced so-called story, claiming that President Trump disparaged veterans, wasn't really an Atlantic news story at all; it was a coordinated hit job involving the press, Democratic operatives, and associated leftist groups connected to the military, executed with impeccable timing.  The Atlantic is building a name for itself for its uncorrected false stories, and this one's not at all different.

Did Pro-Biden Vet Group Collude With The Atlantic Or Anonymous White House Sources To Release Anti-Trump Ad?  [Scroll down]  Shortly after publication, The Atlantic's anonymously-sourced reporting was making viral rounds on the internet and provoked immediate reactions from well-organized rapid-response teams from all corners of the political arena.  True to form, Democrats and legacy media predictably latched onto the latest accusations built entirely on secret sources as an illustration of the president's corrupt character, highlighting previous public comments on McCain as evidence to support The Atlantic's credibility relying on anonymous insiders.  The White House on the other hand, vehemently denied Thursday's allegations while conservatives called out The Atlantic's flouting of journalistic values of transparency publishing what could have very well been made up.  After all, The Atlantic did just that in July, and refused to correct the record for days after it got caught.

Anatomy of A(nother) Fake Scandal.  The Atlantic published a tale based on anonymous sources that the President referred to veterans who had lost their lives in battles as "suckers" and losers" and refused to go to a French cemetery honoring WWI American veterans because he feared his hair would be mussed.  The magazine is now majority owned by Steve Jobs's very rich widow, Laurene, who contributed $500,000 to the Biden campaign and who seems to have reshaped it as the Biden sleazy propaganda arm.  It previously published a pro-defund the police article — supposedly a firsthand account of witnessing a police officer shoot an unarmed youngster for ignoring a basketball sign-in sheet — which, as the extensive Federalist investigation showed, was utter poppycock.  While the Atlantic was the ringleader, the usual media wizards copied and pasted the unsupported claims by Jeffrey Goldberg and megaphoned them.  Sean Davis of the Federalist noted the series of fake scandals promoted by the same journalists "who bought and peddled the Iraq WMD hoax, the Rolling Stone UVA rape hoax, the Russian collusion hoax, the Covington Kids hoax, the Kavanaugh hoax, and the latest Atlantic hoax."

The Leftist Atlantic Behind the Garbage Military Hit Piece on Trump — Is Owned by a Joe Biden Mega-Donor.  On Thursday [9/3/2020] The Atlantic website published a garbage hit piece on President Donald Trump and his alleged hatred of the military and US veterans.  President Trump has done more for the US military than any president in decades.  Trump is also the first president in decades who DID NOT start any new wars or send American soldiers into conflict with unwinnable and dangerous restrictions.  The garbage hit piece also comes as President Trump continues to surge in the polls following the amazing RNC convention and the continued leftist riots across the country.  The liberal media and FOX News have been pushing this article that is based entirely on alleged anonymous sources.

The nefarious purpose behind The Atlantic's 'Trump and the military' hoax.  On Thursday [9/3/2020], The Atlantic published an article that used anonymous sources to claim that President Trump repeatedly disparaged American troops, both living and dead.  By Friday morning, Democrats were weaponizing the article to cover for Biden's serious problems with the military:  His support for the Iraq War, and the way the Obama administration weakened the military.  Trump, however, revitalized the military and fought for the troops.  The article's primary allegations are that Trump refused to visit a WWI cemetery because of his hair, said the Marines who died taking Belleau Wood were "suckers" and "losers," and drew back in revulsion from troops who lost limbs.  Every assertion is false.  People with first-hand information who were willing to go on the record exposed how terribly The Atlantic lied about Trump.  John Bolton, a Trump foe, was clear.  "I was there," he said, about the decision to cancel the Belleau Wood trip, and "I didn't hear that."  Contemporaneous documents support Bolton, but The Atlantic ignored them.

WH's Kayleigh McEnany Wipes the Floor with The Atlantic Over 'Fake News' 'Propaganda'.  On Friday afternoon [9/4/2020], White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany continued the full court press from the Trump administration and campaign to debunk, deny, and dispose of Thursday's Atlantic hit piece against President Trump from liberal hack editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg, calling it "conspiracy-laden propaganda" and "fake news" that abandoned "all journalistic integrity."  And in a true mic drop moment, McEnany read the roughly four-minute statement and left the podium without taking questions.

The Latest Garbage Hit Piece On Trump Begins to Fall Apart as Verifiable Counter Evidence Emerges.  The story alleged that the President had slandered dead marines as "losers" and that he didn't want wounded veterans at his military parade.  As I wrote in my original piece, this story is obviously nonsense.  Trump has always made it a habit to laud the military, including those that have lost limbs or died.  Any disagreements he's had with military members have always centered on politics, usually involving someone attacking him first.  One can argue the wisdom of some of his counter-attacks, but there's no evidence Trump has ever held animosity towards those in the military.  In fact, there's plenty of evidence to the contrary.

McCain son-in-law defends Trump, as pressure builds for The Atlantic to give up its sources.  Pressure is building on the alleged anonymous sources to identify themselves after claiming to The Atlantic that President Donald Trump savaged the late Sen. John McCain and fallen World War I soldiers.  In a report published Thursday [9/3/2020] that was written by the magazine's Left-wing editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg, the sources claim the president canceled a visit in 2018 to a World War I cemetery where American dead were buried because the trip would mess his hair up.  He also allegedly disparaged the soldiers and Marines buried there as "losers" and "suckers" — descriptions of American dead that seem wholly out of character for a president who has gone out of his way to thank, praise, and take care of the U.S. military.

Biden Megadonor Owns The Atlantic, Reportedly Communicates Often With Journalist Behind Anonymously-Sourced Trump Bombshell.  The Atlantic's majority owner has donated over $1.2 million to Democratic candidates and political committees since 2019 while reportedly keeping in close contact with the magazine's editor-in-chief, who published an anonymously-sourced story Thursday alleging that President Donald Trump denigrated fallen American soldiers.  Billionaire philanthropist Laurene Powell Jobs, the widow of former Apple CEO Steve Jobs, obtained a 70% stake in The Atlantic in 2017 through her firm, the Emerson Collective.  In November, she further solidified her control over the magazine after its longtime chairman, David Bradley, said he was going to step away from management, according to Politico.

Here's How We Know The Atlantic's Hit Piece on Trump Is Pure Fiction.  A report published Thursday by The Atlantic cited anonymous sources claiming that President Donald Trump didn't want to visit the Aisne-Marne American Cemetery near Paris in 2018 because the troops there who died in battle were "losers" and "suckers.  The media has largely reported on this story as though it were true or at least likely to be true.  "The Atlantic Magazine is dying, like most magazines, so they make up a fake story in order to gain some relevance," Trump tweeted on Friday.  "Story already refuted, but this is what we are up against.  Just like the Fake Dossier.  You fight and fight, and then people realize it was a total fraud!"  Even CNN's Brian Stelter seemed to acknowledge that the claims of anonymous sources aren't as convincing.

Coincidence? Hours After The Atlantic's Hit Piece on Trump Came a Pre-Produced Commercial.  The "story" in The Atlantic about President Trump derisively speaking of fallen U.S. troops has been widely debunked by people who were actually there, as my PJ Media colleague Matt Margolis writes, and now there's even more reason to doubt its veracity.  Within hours of The Atlantic's hit piece on Trump, there was a far-Left "Vote Vets" commercial on the air about it and a question about the Atlantic story was the first one asked at a Joe Biden campaign presser. [...] [I]t's as if they were working together or something.

Trump-Hater John Bolton Debunks Anonymous Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump's Veterans Record.  Fired former National Security Advisor John Bolton, who released an anti-Trump book earlier this year that sought to offer one last breath into the Democrats' February impeachment hopes, debunked The Atlantic hit piece published Thursday.  The magazine's story relied entirely on anonymous sources to charge the president with making disparaging remarks on WWI veterans.  Thursday night [9/3/2020], Atlantic Editor in Chief Jeffrey Goldberg offered new allegations on why the president didn't visit the graves of fallen WWI soldiers on a 2018 trip to France, which the White House has continued to claim was due to inclement weather.

John Bolton Rejects Atlantic Story: 'I Was There'; 'I Didn't Hear That'.  Former National Security Advisor John Bolton has disputed a story in The Atlantic claiming that President Donald Trump called fallen World War I soldiers "losers."  Bolton told the New York Times Friday [9/4/2020] that "I was there" and "I didn't hear that."  The Atlantic's Jeffrey Goldberg published an article titled "Trump:  Americans Who Died in War Are 'Losers' and 'Suckers'."  The story also claimed that Trump skipped a 2018 visit to the Aisne-Marne American Cemetery near Paris, where the fallen of the battle of Belleau Wood are buried, because he feared rain would ruin his hair.  Goldberg's sources were all anonymous.

The Unraveling Narrative Behind The Atlantic's Defund-The-Police 'Shooting' Tale.  When social justice activist and lawyer Derecka Purnell was just 12 years old, she and her sister watched a police officer shoot a young boy in a city recreation center because he had ignored the basketball sign-in sheet.  This jarring, emotional, and deeply unsettling story was published July 6 at The Atlantic, in the section reserved for ideas, under the bold, attention-grabbing headline, "How I Became a Police Abolitionist."  Purnell's deeply personal story of shattered innocence and shattered bones at the end of a policeman's gun was shared widely among top journalists and activists.  "I started her article thinking abolition was impossible and ending thinking it must happen," the president of a social justice think tank at Harvard wrote on Twitter, quoting his mother.  "This is a beautifully written piece," the Atlantic's constitutional law editor agreed.  "Derecka is the future," an activist journalism executive declared.  There's a major problem with Purnell's story, however.  Based on a Federalist investigation of newspaper archives and the police department records, and questions to The Atlantic, the police union, and the office of the mayor, it does not appear to have ever happened.

The Atlantic Must Stop Covering For The Chinese Communist Party.  The Chinese Communist Party does not want to be held responsible as the source or for the spread of COVID-19, also rightfully known as the Wuhan virus.  This is entirely unsurprising for an authoritarian regime that has long deployed propaganda and manipulation.  What is surprising, and alarming for Americans, is that the U.S. publication The Atlantic would adopt China's anti-American disinformation efforts.  Since the outbreak began in Wuhan in early January, Chinese officials have concealed information about the spread of the virus, silenced and punished Chinese doctors who tried to warn others, ordered the destruction of lab evidence, and claimed the virus originated in the United States.  Instead of investigating or writing about China's propaganda machine working in real time as we watch the virus rapidly spread across the globe, journalists at The Atlantic are more interested in writing their own pro-China, anti-American virus hot takes.

Trump, racism, and the media's obsession.  If it weren't for their sick obsession with race, the national media would have next to nothing to talk about.  The October issue of The Atlantic magazine features a long essay by Ta-Nehisi Coates on President Trump being "The First White President," a lament about the shame Americans should feel in electing a white man after a black one.  It's been heralded by Coates' media peers as a "blockbuster" and something to "admire," since it goes on and on about racism and nothing else.  Legitimate reasons voters had for choosing Trump are legion (the suffocating politically-correct culture, immigration, Hillary Clinton's laugh) but Coates chalked up the entire 2016 outcome to white racists and Trump's whole agenda to bigotry.

Magazine Retracts Claim That Fetal Heartbeats Are 'Imaginary'.  One of Washington's most influential magazines published several updates to an error-filled article attacking ultrasound technology, without acknowledging the extent of those corrections.  The Atlantic published "How the Ultrasound Pushed the Idea That a Fetus Is a Person" on Tuesday [1/24/2017].  The 2,500-word article argued that ultrasound technology "has been used to create an imaginary 'heartbeat' and sped-up videos that falsely depict a response to stimulus."  The article by Moira Weigel, a Yale doctoral candidate in comparative literature, included at least three major errors that the publication corrected.

Abortion Science:  Heartbeats Are Imaginary, Unborn Babies Aren't Alive, And Ultrasounds Are Just Tools Of The Patriarchy.  The abortion industry has a new enemy:  ultrasounds.  In a bizarre and rambling 2,600-word feature piece published on Tuesday [1/24/2017], The Atlantic writer Moira Weigel took a sledgehammer to basic science and then did her best to vacuum its brains out before anyone could figure out what just happened.  The article's headline is bad enough — "How the Ultrasound Pushed the Idea That a Fetus Is a Person" — but its subhed is the real work of art:  "The technology has been used to create an 'imaginary' heartbeat and sped-up videos that falsely depict a response to stimulus."  There are numerous other gems throughout the piece, such as her implication that only male doctors are allowed to use ultrasounds.


National Public Radio

NPR's Nina Totenberg: 'Leading theory' is conservative clerk leaked abortion opinion.  One of the Supreme Court's longtime reporters said the "leading theory" is that a conservative clerk leaked the majority draft opinion indicating the high court is poised to overturn Roe v. Wade.  Nina Totenberg, a legal affairs correspondent for NPR, said the only theory that makes sense is that the leak came from someone who "was afraid that this majority might not hold."

NPR's infamously wrong Nina Totenberg:  It 'makes sense' Supreme Court leaker [would be] a 'conservative clerk'.  In a display of mudslinging disguised as journalism, one NPR reporter maintained her track record of laying unsubstantiated claims related to the Supreme Court when she dismissed any other possible origin for the SCOTUS leak other then a "conservative clerk who was afraid."  NPR's legal affairs correspondent Nina Totenberg appeared on ABC's "This Week" Sunday where she was asked to assess the situation surrounding the release of Justice Samuel Alito's draft majority opinion for the case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.  Host Martha Raddatz brought her guest into the segment by commenting on the lengthy duration for which Totenberg has covered SCOTUS.

Here are the Most Egregious Fake News Stories of 2018.  [#21] NPR: Donald Trump Jr. committed perjury:  NPR published a report in November insisting that Donald Trump Jr. lied to Congress about efforts to build a Trump Tower in Moscow because his statements conflicted with those of former Trump attorney Michael Cohen.  However, NPR failed to realize that the piece of Trump Jr.'s testimony they quoted was about a different project.

NPR Blatantly Lies About Donald Trump Jr.'s 2017 Senate Testimony.  NPR falsely claimed that Donald Trump Jr.'s testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee in September 2017 conflicted with an account given by a former attorney for President Donald Trump. [...] In fact, Senate investigators were asking Trump Jr. about a series of efforts to develop property in Russia, going back several years.  Reporter Phil Ewing (reporter Tim Mak contributed to the story) conflates one of those efforts with another separate effort.  That conflation results in the false news report.

Donald Trump Jr Responds to NPR Finally Retracting False Story About Him.  In another example of why Americans increasingly distrust the establishment media to present factually sound, unbiased news, NPR published a report Friday claiming that Donald Trump Jr.'s testimony to Congress conflicted with the current claims of Michael Cohen about the "Moscow Trump Tower" deal discussions taking place in 2016.  After a number of reporters from various outlets called out NPR for reporting what was a verifiably false claim, the network finally issued a correction and deleted its original tweet — but not before the false report had permeated social media and made its way to CNN.

When The Truth Gets In The Way.  [Scroll down]  NPR hadn't bothered to check the whole transcript in the research, writing, or editing phases of their "reporting," and neither did any of the so-called journalists who'd help spread the fake story once it broke.  It fit perfectly with the liberal narrative of the Trump family bring Russian puppets — no fact-checking was necessary, it had to be true because they'd wished for it be.  But the note should have been a complete retraction, as the entire premise of the story was wrong.  Everyone who read it in that 5-hour window, before the "note" was added, was lied to and believed that lie, likely spreading that lie to others to this day.  The lie always beats the truth with people who desperately want to believe it.

Timmy Earl Kinner
Mass stabbing at Idaho apartment complex leaves 9 injured, suspect in custody, police say.  Nine people, including six children, were injured in a mass stabbing in an apartment complex in Boise, Idaho, on Saturday night, with four of the victims reported to be in critical condition, officials said.  The Ada County Sheriff's Office told Fox News on Sunday [7/1/2018] 30-year-old Timmy Earl Kinner of Los Angeles has been arrested in connection with the attack.  Kinner has been charged with 9 counts of battery-aggravated assault, and 6 counts of injury to a child, according to jail records.


Fake news from Trump-hating NPR Update:  NPR says it was fake.  Taxpayer-subsidized National Public Radio is as shameless as CNN in its efforts to blame President Trump or his supporters for everything bad that happens.  Why wait for facts when the narrative was so blindingly obvious in the case of a stabbing attack on refugees in... Boise, Idaho? [...] So why would NPR leap to the conclusion that a Trump-supporter was the perp?  Everyone at all the best cocktail parties in Washington, D.C. knows that Idaho is populated by white racists, holdouts against the new emerging nonwhite majority of America, who have retreated to Whitetopia, as NPR itself instructed us.

NPR Bungles Sea Level Rise Story (supposed threats to coastal military installations ignore science).  National Public Radio's March 31 "Morning Edition" program carried a "news" story claiming that rising seas threaten a number of U.S. coastal military bases.  The commentary was so laden with factual errors that listeners might have thought it was an early April fool's joke.  Unfortunately, it was not.  NPR remains so wedded to its belief that humans and carbon dioxide emissions are causing a fossil fuels-driven global warming catastrophe that its reporting has been compromised, and it is unable to think critically or report honestly without resorting to activist claims and fake news events.  Real journalism would have at least included passing references to alternative views and sources.  But they were absent in this story, which in truth is a splendid example of ignorance or deception — reader's choice.


MSNBC

Chess With a Pigeon.  A couple of weeks ago, the "journalist" Jen Psaki was running a panel discussion on the absolute outrage of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s appointment to lead the Department of Health and Human Services — because HHS is a public health organization, see, and RFK Jr. is a lawyer who has no medical background or public health credentials.  One of the panelists mentioned that hey, wait a minute, the Biden administration's current HHS secretary is a lawyer who has no medical background or public health credentials, so doesn't that mean that Kennedy is just as qualified as the current secre — ANYWAY, LET'S MOVE ON, Psaki said, leaping into the discussion to make sure the wrong arguments weren't made.  So Psaki knew perfectly well that she was making an untenable, partisan argument that was designed to mislead, and she knew what the evidence was against her position.  And she worked to prevent the completely obvious narrative counterattack.  She knew what she was doing:  lying to dirty up the Kennedy appointment.

Kash Patel Slaps Turncoat Mike Pence Advisor, Olivia Troye, with Legal Notice for Defamation.  In yet another example of the left's desperate attempts to smear President-elect Donald Trump's allies, Olivia Troye, a former advisor to turncoat Mike Pence, is facing the heat after making outrageous defamatory statements about Trump's pick for FBI Director, Kash Patel.  On November 30, 2024, President-elect Trump announced the nomination of Patel to lead the FBI, an institution tarnished by years of political corruption under figures like James Comey and Chris Wray.  Trump's base praised the nomination, viewing Patel as a figure who could restore integrity and accountability to the Bureau.  But Olivia Troye, who has gained notoriety for her venomous tirades against her former colleagues, appeared on Joy Reid's MSNBC show to launch a tirade against Patel.

'Morning Joe' Buries Biden Pardon Story for 52 Minutes.  Yep, on today's episode of MSNBC's "Morning Joe," our favorite cartoon, co-host Joe Scarborough and his equally fun co-host and wife, Mika Brzezinski, refused to cover President Joe Biden's sweeping pardon of his son, Hunter Biden, as either of the show's top two stories.  The dynamic duo, along with their guests, instead chose to first whine about President-elect Donald Trump's nominations of Kash Patel as incoming FBI Director and Pete Hegseth as Secretary of Defense.  Then, 52 minutes into the show, Scarborough finally "reported" on the pardon, offering zero commentary as the panel discussed the beyond-controversial decision by the lame-duck president.

We Are Thankful for the Collapse of Liberal Networks This Year.  There is so much to be thankful for this Thanksgiving — President-elect Donald Trump's sweeping win, a massive red wave hitting the United States, and most notably, the downfall of liberal mainstream media. [...] As ratings continue to drop after Trump's sweeping victory, mainstream media outlets are looking to draft a complete overhaul of their networks, including program changes, shakeups among household names, and pay cuts.  [MSNBC host Rachel] Maddow's contract was quietly renewed but under very different conditions from previous years.  Most notably, Maddow made a fool of herself after crying on-air that she had to take a $5 million pay cut and will now make only $25 million yearly for the next five years.  So, while you say your thanks for your family, memories, and friends, make sure to throw a Hail Mary to Maddow so that she can still afford her multi-million dollar mansion.

MSNBC Claims It Had No Idea Kamala Paid Al Sharpton $500K Before On-Air Interview..  MSNBC claims it was initially unaware of Vice President Kamala Harris's campaign payments to network host Al Sharpton's National Action Network non-profit before his interview with the 2024 Democrat presidential nominee.  The group received $500,000 through two payments from the Harris campaign on September 5 and October 1.  The donations were made public weeks before his interview with Harris on October 20. During the interview, which many have described as softball, Sharpton praised Harris and criticized now President-elect Donald J. Trump.  The timing of the contributions has drawn criticism from journalists questioning the network's journalistic integrity.

MSNBC on Kamala Payment to Sharpton:  Huh?  Ho hum, nothing to see here, just a little payola between friends.  One has to wonder at MSNBC's identity as a news and current affairs channel.  It had been well over two weeks since the Washington Free Beacon's Chuck Ross first revealed that Al Sharpton's nonprofit National Action Network received $500,000 from Kamala Harris' campaign.  The money came in two separate $250,000 remittances, one on September 5 and the other on October 1.  [Advertisement]  Just coincidentally, Sharpton then gave Harris airtime to wish him a happy birthday on October 3, and then conducted an infomercial on MSNBC's air disguised as a news interview: [...] Paying a show host for air time has a particular term in broadcasting:  payola.  Technically, MSNBC isn't a broadcast channel, so the law may not apply, but that's debatable.  What's not debatable is that Sharpton conducted a corrupt act with this undisclosed personal benefit for his organization after taking a cool half-million bucks in donor money from Team Kamala for this infomercial.  And MSNBC still holds itself out as a news organization, operating for the moment under the purview of NBC News.

MSNBC's Repeated Sympathy For Laken Riley's Killer Shows You Don't Hate Corporate Media Enough.  MSNBC claimed that "Laken Riley's killer never stood a chance" in the murder trial, sparking immediate backlash.  It has since revised its headline to cushion the language — though it is equally twisted.  "Laken Riley's killer never stood a chance," reads the original headline.  "The guilt of Laken Riley's killer was never in doubt," reads the new headline.  Apparently, MSNBC hopes readers will give the outlet a pass for repeatedly defending Riley's savage murderer, Jose Ibarra.  Ibarra attacked Riley, a 22-year-old student at the Augusta University College of Nursing, while she was jogging in February.  He tried to rape her, but she fought back, and he smashed her skull with a rock.  Riley called 911, but Ibarra ultimately killed her.  A court sentenced Ibarra to life in prison on Wednesday for the brutal slaying in Georgia.  Ibarra has been in the country illegally since 2022.  Prosecutors did not pursue the death penalty, but officials are still demanding it.

Bill O'Reilly Says Major Cable Company Is Throwing MSNBC 'Overboard' To Protect Reputation.  Former Fox News host Bill O'Reilly said Wednesday evening that Comcast was tossing MSNBC "overboard" to save the reputation and ratings of NBC News.  Comcast announced it was spinning off multiple cable networks, including the left-wing news channel that featured hosts Rachel Maddow, Joy Reid, Chris Hayes, Nicolle Wallace and Lawrence O'Donnell Wednesday, the Wall Street Journal reported.  O'Reilly asserted that MSNBC hosts Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski were "ordered" to visit President-elect Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago because executives planned to announce the spinoff.

'Hypocrite' Joe Scarborough blasted for ideological U-turns to chase 'success and social status': sources.  One of Joe Scarborough's favorite words seems to be "hypocrite."  The aging-hipster MSNBC host of liberal "Morning Joe" frequently blasted Donald Trump for apparent "hypocrisy," fuming in October that he makes hypocritical statements "every day."  Yet despite their frequent blasts over the last eight years, Scarborough, 61, and co-host wife Mika Brzezinski, 57, met President-elect Donald Trump last Sunday at Mar-a-Lago in a bid to settle their differences.  There are those, including Jon Stewart, who believe the term "hypocrite" would be well applied to Scarborough.

MSNBC's 'Interview' of Harris Shows How Left-Wing Media Are Treating Election as Coronation.  Vice President Kamala Harris completed her second whole interview of her mostly cloistered presidential campaign Wednesday night.  Frankly, it was an embarrassment for American corporate media and gives the lie to the idea that the Harris campaign is all about defending "democracy."  The interview was exactly what one would expect if you'd followed the Harris campaign at all.  It was a series of mostly softball questions, delivered in the friendliest of confines on left-wing MSNBC, conducted by an admiring and sycophantic host, Stephanie Ruhle.  That setup was practically telegraphed ahead of time.  Five days before the interview, Ruhle went on HBO's "Real Time With Bill Maher" and claimed that Harris didn't have to answer any substantive questions from the media.  "Kamala Harris isn't running for perfect," Ruhle heatedly told the New York Times' Bret Stephens, another guest on the program.

MSNBC Lets the Biden Cat out of the Bag.  Morning Joe, or "Morning Joke" as I like to refer to it as, is a propaganda arm for the Democrat party.  But then again, so is CNN, network news, and increasingly more often, Fox News.  They are no longer even pretending to be apolitical or objective, like how the left still pretends that men can become pregnant.  Morning Joe hit that mark this past week. [...] On last Thursday's show, Mika opined, "The Dems need to get it together.  They really need to get whatever they've got going, going.  Whatever it is, the problem should not be our candidate.  The focus should be on Donald Trump[.]"  Our candidate?  Joe and Mika's candidate?  Or MSNBC's candidate?  No surprise but there it is.  If Biden is their candidate, is their show considered a campaign contribution to the Biden/Harris campaign?  Why should the focus be on Trump?  Biden has been in charge for the past four years.

To Call Them Journalists Is A Misnomer.  MSNBC took an interesting step on Monday morning.  They pulled their premier program, Morning Joe because they feared the hosts or guests would say something inflammatory about Trump or the shooting in Pennsylvania.  Management of these networks understands the Danger of the vile rhetoric spewed daily by their "journalists."  These people do not deserve the title.  Whether on a news or opinion show, they are partisan arms of the Democrat Party.  They hate Trump.  Republicans, the Conservative movement, and most of all, America and they are not afraid to prove it.

It's Long Past Time for MSNBC to Fire Joy Reid.  Joy Reid's descent into madness has been well-chronicled on MSNBC, but her latest comments suggesting the assassination attempt against Donald Trump was staged should be the final straw that earns her a pink slip from the network.  Reid, aside from lacking talent outright, is now a danger to the public discourse due to her lead role as a BlueAnon conspiracy theorist.  Earlier in the week, she accused Trump of using the attempt on his life as a "photo op."  "Donald Trump is an elderly man who, for whatever reason, was given nine seconds to take an iconic photo-op during an active shooter situation," she declared.  Yes, of course.  Because it seems likely that a man who just had his head nearly blown off thoughtfully crafted a plan to gather the Secret Service around him in the hopes that a photographer was snapping away.  Reid then tried to convince her followers that the GOP candidate didn't actually get shot.

Joy Reid Is Saying Trump Was Never Hit By A Bullet And His Secret Service Detail Actually Killed Two People.  Joy Reid of MSNBC is now suggesting that Donald Trump was never hit by a bullet, and that his campaign and the Secret Service colluded to kill two people in a fake assassination attempt just so Trump could have a photo op.  Outrageous.  Insane.  Defamatory.  NBC must take Reid off the air, and Donald Trump should sue her, immediately.  [Video clip]

MSNBC Did Not Show 'a Single Second of the Gold Star Families' at the RNC.  The MSNBC broadcast cut away and showed no second of the Gold Families at the RNC.  How do they live with themselves?  That's a rhetorical question.  Biden's disastrous Afghanistan withdrawal led to the deaths of 13 Marines.  All of the families want Biden gone.  That interferes with MSNBC's agenda, which is more important than honoring the heroes.  [Tweet]

MSNBC's Joy Reid Suggests Biden Surviving COVID is the Same as Trump Surviving an Assassination Attempt.  Joy Reid of MSNBC is either incredibly desperate or completely insane.  Maybe both.  Today, Reid suggested that if Biden survives his current case of COVID, that it's just like Trump surviving an assassination attempt where someone nearly blew his brains out with a gun.  Are the people who run MSNBC capable of feeling shame or embarrassment?

MSNBC Pushes Debunked Conspiracy Theory that Trump Wasn't Shot.  Despite the graphic photographic evidence from different angles showing former President Trump was missing chunks of his right ear after being shot in the head during a failed assassination attempt over the weekend, MSNBC host Michael Steele wasted oxygen during the network's coverage of Night Two of the Republican National Convention on Tuesday to spew debunked fringe conspiracy theories claiming Trump wasn't actually hit by a bullet.  "Where I am at this point, it's been three days, going on four... and yet, we have not received a medical report from the hospital nor have we received a medical report from the campaign or from the Trump organization about the extent of the damage to his ear," he decried.  Steele, who's not a ballistics expert nor was he pro-gun rights in any meaningful way, bloviated about how "If he was shot by a high-caliber bullet, there should probably be very little ear there.  And so we would like to know that."

The Editor says...
This is an example of ultracrepidarianism:  The man is offering opinions on a subject well beyond his area of expertise, whatever that area may be.  Nobody owes this man a "medical report" on Trump's injuries.

As Regis Philbin used to say, "Who kez?"
Morning Joe and Mika Threaten to Quit After They Were Abruptly Pulled Off Air Following Trump Assassination Attempt.  MSNBC's Morning Joe hosts Mika Brzezinski and Joe Scarborough threatened to quit after they were abruptly pulled off the air on Monday following the attempted assassination against Trump.  Mika and Joe were told not to show up for work on Monday because NBC would have just one news feed all day.

Joe Scarborough and Mika Whine About Being Yanked Off the Air Yesterday, Threaten to Quit if It Happens Again.  Well, NBC would never have the courage to dump propagandists who instigated the Trump assassination on Saturday (Joe and Mika), so they are threatening NBC.  If they ever yank them off the air again, Joe and Mika are threatening to quit. [...]  [Two tweets with video clips.]

The Editor says...
Why wait til the last minute?  Go ahead and quit now!

MSNBC pulls 'Morning Joe' from air Monday reportedly over concerns about Trump assassination attempt commentary.  MSNBC nixed broadcasting its "Morning Joe" program Monday due to concerns about possible inappropriate commentary in the wake of Saturday's assassination attempt against former President Donald Trump, CNN reported.  MSNBC's focus Monday is breaking news coverage of the shooting at Trump's rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, CNN said, adding that "Morning Joe" will be back on the air Tuesday.  CNN, citing an individual familiar with the matter, said MSNBC made the move to prevent the possibility of inappropriate commentary on "Morning Joe" that could hurt the progressive cable news network.  Instead, the individual told CNN, breaking news coverage would air.

MSNBC Host Calls For Biden Aides To Be Allowed ON STAGE With Him At Next Debate.  MSNBC host Lawrence O'Donnell has called for allowing Joe Biden to have aides with him on stage to speak for him and help him sound coherent.  Yes, really.  This is where we are now.  O'Donnell said that it would be good to "Allow the candidates to have as many staff as they want, join them on the stage throughout the debate, and make sure that all of them have microphones."  He added that "the candidates should be allowed to turn to their staff and confer with them about anything at any time in the debate."  "And we should be able to hear everything they say.  So we can hear if the candidate has competent or incompetent staff, we could hear the candidate overrule some advisers and say something else," he continued.

The Editor says...
MSNBC apparently wants to stage a televised shouting match, rather than a one-on-one debate.  It's more likely to resemble Jerry Springer than GE College Bowl.

How I wish this were true.
Hysterical Rachel Maddow Says SCOTUS Has Authorized Trump's 'Death Squads'.  Rachel Maddow, the MSNBC host and arch-Russiagate conspiracist, is claiming the Supreme Court has authorized Donald Trump to send "right-wing death squads" after his opponents with its ruling on presidential immunity.  "Donald Trump and his counsel asked for this 100 percent absolute immunity thing, which was insane.  I would say they got 105 percent of what they were asking for," she said of the ruling, which guts the lawfare prosecutions Joe Biden's Justice Department is bringing against the America First leader.

MSNBC Gives Extremely Absurd 'Analysis' About Latest Supreme Court Decision.  Following the Supreme Court's 6-3 ruling, which acknowledges that a former president has absolute immunity for his core constitutional powers, and beyond that, at least presumptive immunity for official conduct, MSNBC decided it would be a good idea to bring on a legal analyst who claims former presidents could order assassinations and get away with it. [...] MSNBC is desperate because they see that the tide is turning, and they will say anything with the hope that their message sticks.  Per usual, MSNBC's incendiary comments are designed to stoke fear and distract from the actual content and implications of the ruling.  Suggesting that the decision could lead to presidential assassination orders is not only irresponsible but also blatant misrepresentation.

MSNBC Host Pretty Sure Rising Gas Prices Due to Russian-Saudi Plot to Elect Trump.  With grocery prices steadily climbing, gas prices again on the rise, and overall inflation continuing to hammer tens of millions of Americans, the quasi-official Democrat media continue to pull out all the stops in their desperate attempt to prop up embattled Joe Biden and burn Donald Trump's campaign to the ground.  On Wednesday, MSNBC's Stephanie Ruhle took home the trophy.  "The 11th Ruhle" host twisted herself into a ridiculous pretzel as she heroically (in hopelessly biased fashion) tried to absolve Biden of blame.  Since Trump hasn't been in office for more than two years, she couldn't blame Trump.  But wait.  Ruhle is no amateur.  She decided she could blame those who (she thinks) want Trump to win in November.  In this case, "those" are none other than Russia and Saudi Arabia.  Yep, as Stephanie sees it, Russian dictator Putin and the oi-rich Saudis have concocted a plot to torpedo Biden and elect Trump.

MSNBC Host Says Trump 'Promised American Carnage' — He Promised the Opposite.  MSNBC's "This Weekend" co-anchor Symone Sanders-Townsend (who was also Sen. Bernie Sanders' (I-VT) 2016 national press secretary), declared on Saturday's episode of the hopelessly biased show that Trump "promised carnage" in his January 2017 Inauguration Day address.  Just one problem.  Sanders-Townsend either blatantly lied or had zero idea what she was talking about.  Trump not only didn't "promise carnage" — he promised the exact opposite, which we'll get to in a bit.  I suspect the truth was a bit of both.  Sanders-Townsend had zero idea what she was talking about, other than the word "carnage," and she ran with it.  Given her probable hatred of Trump, perhaps she assumed he said what she said he said.

Hyperbolic MSNBC's Ronna McDaniel Debacle.  The word broke on March 26 that NBC News was reversing its decision to hire former Republican Party chair Ronna McDaniel as a political commentator.  MSNBC hosts across the schedule broke out into frenzied denunciations of whichever executive who thought that McDaniel should be paid to speak anywhere on this hypnotically/robotically anti-Trump network.  In one of her typical half-hour jeremiads, Rachel Maddow compared McDaniel to a mobster and a pickpocket.  "You wouldn't — you wouldn't hire a wise guy, you wouldn't hire a made man, like a mobster, to work at a DA's office, right?  You wouldn't hire a pickpocket to work as a TSA screener.  And so I find the decision to put her on the payroll inexplicable.  And I hope they will reverse their decision."  There was no need for NBC News to hire McDaniel.  One can look at the election results during her tenure at the RNC and question her expertise at winning elections.  But this mobster talk underlines once again that MSNBC is not a "news" channel.  It's a hyperbole channel, constantly fearmongering its audience that the end times are near for democracy.

The Editor says...
The fact that Ronna McDaniel would ever accept a job offer from MSNBC shows that she was a RINO all along.

The True 'Threat To Democracy' Isn't White Americans, It's The Democrat Party.  Very Important Columnists Tom Schaller and Paul Waldman just released their book White Rural Rage, about flyover Americans and their support for Donald Trump.  They're doing rounds through the Democrat media circuit to plug it.  One of those fun little appearances happened on MSNBC's "Morning Joe."  It's hard to put into words just how delusional and dishonest the segment was — as in, every single word.  These highfalutin "journalists" [...] wouldn't know the honest truth if it introduced itself by name and punched them in the face.  Not only do the writers, who purport to be experts on Middle America, misunderstand everything about it.  They also project Democrats' nastiest and most conspicuous political impulses onto white, rural folks.  It's like the pot calling the kettle black — if the pot were actually white, racist, conspiratorial, anti-democratic, and violent.  "We lay out the four-fold, interconnected threat that white, rural voters pose to the country," Schaller said with a straight face to Mika Brzezinski.

Common sense thought control.  I agree that many Americans foolishly and readily accept propaganda.  A majority of Americans still believe that carbon dioxide kills life on the planet even though the reality is that carbon dioxide and water make life possible.  Many Americans also fell for believing Putin rigged the 2016 election, that Hunter Biden's laptop was a Russian plant and that a protest inside the Capitol was an insurrection.  What these outrageous lies share in common is that they all are promoted by the central government in efforts to expand its power (climate change), cover its crimes of spying (Russian Hoax), fix the 2020 election (not investigating the laptop), and imprison a president to keep him from getting a second term (insurrection).  [MSNBC legal analyst Barbara] McQuade is not interested in stopping those lies by the government.  No, no, no.  She is interested in silencing those of us who tell such truths as Obama had the FBI spy on Donald Trump and covered it up with a whacky tale of Putin being in cahoots with The Donald.

Moments Ago Joe Scarborough Lied and Claimed Four Policemen Died on Jan 6.  Today, more than three years after Jan 6 and the unraveling of the big lie, Joe Scarborough claimed that four policemen died on Jan 6.  [Tweet]  Nothing could be further from the truth.  Four people did die on Jan 6 but they weren't policemen or women, they were Trump supporters!

The Unbelievable Nerve of Rachel Maddow and MSNBC Censoring Trump for Supposedly Saying 'Untrue Things'.  After Trump's significant win in the Iowa Caucuses this week, Rachel Maddow of MSNBC declared that her network would not air Trump's remarks, saying, "There is a cost to us as a news organization of knowingly broadcasting untrue things."  [Tweet]  MSNBC spent four solid years promoting the Russia collusion hoax and every other anti-Trump conspiracy they could find.  Nothing was too crazy for them.  Rachel Maddow made a fortune pushing anti-Trump lunacy on her show five nights a week.  In April 2019, I asked this question:  Why Isn't Rachel Maddow Treated Like Other Crazy Conspiracy Theorists?  There are two major differences between Rachel Maddow and Alex Jones.  The first is that Rachel Maddow has never suffered any consequences for pushing conspiracy theories.  The second is that Alex Jones has been right sometimes.

Rachel Maddow Says MSNBC Won't Broadcast 'Untrue Things.' That's Untrue.  MSNBC host Rachel Maddow announced live on-air on Monday [1/15/2024] that she would not cut to President Donald Trump's victory speech in the Iowa caucuses, explaining:  "There is a cost to us as a news organization of knowingly broadcasting untrue things."  It's a line Maddow has repeatedly used before to justify blackballing Trump, the frontrunner for the 2024 GOP presidential nomination. [...] But Maddow's suggestion that MSNBC eschews falsehoods is itself untrue.  She and her network have repeatedly broadcast lies and false accusations as news, in many cases about Trump.  For example, MSNBC effectively endorsed claims that Jussie Smollett was the victim of a MAGA hate crime, COVID-19 vaccines prevent transmission, the "lab leak" theory of COVID-19 was debunked, Trump colluded with Russia to win the presidency, the contents of Hunter Biden's laptop were Russian "disinformation," and President Joe Biden had no involvement in his son's corrupt foreign business dealings.

MSNBC News Actor Literally Cries About Jan 6.  You might note that the tears begin flowing conveniently, as if on cue, right when the introduction starts, and then magically subside in literally about five seconds.  [Video clip]

MSNBC Benches Muslim Hosts Following Last Weeks Slaughter of Jews in Israel.  MSNBC benched their Muslim hosts this week following the slaughter of innocents last weekend by Hamas in Israel.  The Islamist group murdered over 1,300 innocent civilians and captured another 110 civilians as hostages.  Hamas killers murdered nearly 300 young adults at a concert in barbaric fashion.  MSNBC lost 30 percent of their audience this week as they continued to run interference for Hamas following the massacre of innocents.

MSNBC Ratings Nosedive as People Slam Their Horrible Israeli-Hamas Coverage.  We've seen a lot of problematic responses from the left when it comes to the Hamas terrorist attacks on Israel.  But some of the worst from media have come from MSNBC.  People have called them out for their horrible takes, including trying to "both sides" the attack by Hamas on Israel. [...] I love this network," [Jonathan] Greenblatt said.  "But I gotta ask, who's writing the scripts?"  "Hamas, people who did this are not 'fighters,'" Greenblatt said.  "They are not militants, and I'm looking right at the camera.  They are terrorists."  Newsmax summed up how the ADL leader was calling out the network for their coverage, except the Newmax person tagged them as "MSDNC" for their coverage.  Many others were also clearly troubled by the coverage if the ratings are any judge.

Israeli mother of kidnapped children pummels MSNBC for asking about 'attacks' on Gaza: 'There's no symmetry'.  An Israeli mother of two children kidnapped by Hamas tore into MSNBC host Andrea Mitchell for suggesting there's "symmetry" between the bloodshed committed by the terrorist group and the Israel's military response.  The mother, who has chosen to keep her name anonymous out of the safety of her 12 and 16-year-old boys who were taken into Gaza, appeared on Monday's installment of "Andrea Mitchell Reports" and shared her harrowing story about hearing her children on the phone being kidnapped by Hamas as it occurred.  However, things grew tense between the mother and Mitchell when the host asked about her feelings on "the attacks against Gaza right now," alluding to civilian casualties in the Hamas-controlled territory.  "You're looking for a symmetrical situation and I must say it isn't," the mother told Mitchell.  "If you were dealing with a war who is between two countries, countries don't take children hostages.  I'm sorry.  It's against the laws of war.  It's against humanity.  It's against anything that we all believe in."

MSNBC Goes to Bat for Hamas in Stunning Coverage of Palestinian Invasion.  The moment that Palestinian terrorists invaded Israeli and proceeded to rape and murder Israelis on Saturday, it was just a matter of time before an American news outlet debased itself.  Sure enough, and likely to no one's surprise, it was MSNBC that stepped up to the plate.  In an absolutely disgusting scene, multiple MSNBC hosts and analysts went to bat for Hamas while blaming Israel's "far-right" government for the attacks against the Jewish nation.  Here's supposed journalist and Nancy Pelosi fluffer, Andrea Mitchell doing just that.  [Tweet with video clip]

MSNBC: Israel Caused Attacks on It and Made People Vote for Hamas.  During MSNBC's coverage of the Hamas attack on Israel on Saturday, MSNBC host Ayman Mohyeldin argued that the attacks on Israel are due to "people who have been living in Gaza," being "blockaded, besieged, decimated economically and politically" and host Ali Velshi stated that Israel's behavior is "why they voted for Hamas in the first place."

Trump White House Attorney Stefan Passantino Sues MSNBC's Andrew Weissman for Defamation.  Former Trump White House attorney Stefan Passantino filed a defamation lawsuit against MSNBC's Andrew Weissman, who served as lead prosecutor for former special counsel Robert Mueller, over Weissman's claims that Passantino coached discredited January 6 Committee witness Cassidy Hutchinson to lie on the stand.  "Hutchinson's third-hand testimony that Trump grabbed the wheel of his presidential limousine in an effort to force it to drive to the Capitol was rejected by the people she claimed had told her about it," Breitbart News reported.  Passantino represented Hutchinson at the time of her testimony before the committee.  Many members of the media falsely claimed he coached her to lie on the stand, a claim he has repeatedly denied.

Democrats Discover A New 'Threat To Democracy' — The U.S Constitution.  We've been cataloging how the left has taken to labeling every candidate it doesn't like and every policy it opposes a "threat to democracy."  But even we were surprised to see the U.S. Constitution itself added to the list of these threats.  MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell said over the weekend that: "The Constitution has some profoundly anti-democratic, which is to say anti-democracy components, like the Electoral College and the two senators per state, for example."  Mind you, this aired on Sept. 15, just two days before Constitution Day, which this year marked the 236th anniversary of its signing.  O'Donnell was talking to Jamelle Bouie, a New York Timers [sic] columnist, who after nodding his head in agreement with O'Donnell, added that "I think we've witnessed over the last couple years especially with the attempt to overturn the election, the ways that the constitution, its rules, can actually be used against what Americans think identify as a Democracy."

Reporters Are Still Pushing the False Claim Obama Had No Scandals.  The New Yorker's Susan Glaser claimed during an interview on MSNBC the reason why former President Barrack Obama is still popular is because he had no scandals during his administration.  "Susan, it's — it's fairly remarkable the — the extended shelf life that Barack Obama has politically in this country.  Here he is, he's been out of the presidency for quite some time, and yet he is a critical component, obviously, of any reelection campaign for President Biden.  Still, after everything that's happened in the last six or seven years, Barack Obama is still at the top of his game," said MSNBC's Mike Barnicle.  "No, I think that's an excellent point to make.  Because, you know, you look at the incredible contrast between the actions of the Donald Trump and his predecessor Barack Obama, and what's remarkable is that the one of the reasons I think Obama's popularity has held among Democrats is because, you know, there was no scandal in his administration," Glaser replied.

The Editor says...
As a public service, allow me to present Lists of Obama scandals.

MSNBC Hack Claims Joe Biden Was Not Aware of Hunter's Mega-Millions Influence Peddling Because He Was Sad.  This is the type of thoughtful, in depth commentary you can expect from MSNBC.  After Monday's historic Congressional deposition by Devon Archer, Hunter Biden's best friend and business associate, the left is in a panic.  Devon Archer sang like a bird.  Archer told House investigators that Joe Biden met with Hunter Biden's clients numerous times, joined into meetings over the phone, and the family was rewarded with tens of millions of dollars for influence peddling and bribery schemes.  This was damning testimony that directly ties Joe Biden to the family business and foreign bribes.  Hunter and Joe Biden "sold the brand" for millions in political favors.

MSNBC Host Gets Fact Checked On the Spot After Claiming Hillary Clinton Didn't Have Classified Docs.  MSNBC Host Jonathan Capehart was fact-checked on air after claiming failed Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton didn't have classified documents on her server.  During an interview on PBS NewsHour, Capehart was corrected after making an outlandish claim in which he tried to defend Clinton's private server scandal.  He said former President Trump's situation is far worse because he kept classified documents while Clinton "did not."  The Left-wing host claimed the emails on Clinton's server mainly included cooking recipes and appointment reminders.  "Donald Trump is being treated differently because he had classified documents about nuclear secrets, preparedness of America's allies," Capehart said.  "And what we're discovering now is that he has done all of the things he has accused Hillary Clinton of doing, actually done."  Capehart argued there is no similarity at all between Clinton's matter and Trump's.

How about an honest headline and article from MSNBC for a change?  It would read, "The media will eventually be forced to cover the history of Biden family corruption," instead of:  ["]Hunter Biden can't stop gifting the GOP with potential scandals["]  This article makes it appear that Joe is an innocent bystander in the Biden Crime family's business of lining the family's pockets with kickbacks when the truth is Joe was always the head of the family crime business.  Hunter Biden didn't fly on government jets around the World just to keep his dad company.  He flew to get kickbacks for the family and Joe has clearly lied for years that he had no idea what Hunter or his brother did in business and that no one in his family ever made money from foreign countries.  Sadly, MSNBC, along with most of the media, has covered up for the criminal activity of the Bidens and Clintons for years because all they care about is winning elections.  They ran lies about Trump and Russian collusion for years with no evidence, but no matter how much evidence they have that Joe Biden participated in business deals with Hunter, they intentionally lie to the public that there is no evidence.

Angry MSNBC Host Angry Asks What Would Happen if Democrats Had a Propaganda Arm in the Media Like FOX News.  MSNBC's Mehdi Hasan is angry about the FOX News coverage of the Hunter Biden scandals.  Having absolutely zero self-awareness, Hasan wondered on Twitter what would happen if Democrats had a propaganda arm in the media.  Apparently, Hasan has never heard of MSNBC.  Or CNN.  Or the New York Times, the Washington Post, NBC News, ABC News, CBS News, The View, the Huffington Post, etc.

The Left Again Beclowns Itself Over White Supremacy.  [Scroll down]  The MSNBC editorial claims, "Physical fitness has always been central to the far right."  Tell that to the 70 percent or so NFL and NBA players, superb athletes who also happen to be black, not far right politically and would not be playing professional sports if they avoided physical fitness. [...] The editorial also worries, "The realm of online fitness now provides a new and ever-expanding market for reaching and radicalizing young men."  Tell that to on-line fitness giant Les Mills, featuring people of color as instructors and clients.  Their only goal to radicalize clients into getting in shape.  I have taken several of their workout classes and never recall their instructors attempting to convert the class into little Nazis.  Another popular fitness class, Tae Bo, founded by a black man Billy Blanks, must be a hotbed of neo-Nazi indoctrination according to MSNBC.  Michelle Obama must also be a white supremacist due to her fitness initiative "Let's Move," attempting to reduce obesity through diet, exercise, and fitness.  Another fitness program, a spin-off of P90X called Insanity, is led by "super trainer Shaun T," an extremely fit black athlete.

Five times media has tried to pin physical fitness to political extremism.  A recent post on MSNBC's official Twitter site promoting an opinion story about the connection between "physical fitness" and "the far right" has sparked social media backlash about the liberal media repeatedly attempting to make such a connection.  Twitter CEO Elon Musk and podcast host Joe Rogan mocked the tweeted story, which was published in March 2022.  "MSNBC thinks you're a nazi if you work out lmaooo," Musk tweeted Monday, the day of the tweet.  Rogan retweeted the MSNBC post with the comment, "Being healthy is 'far right.' [...]"  MSNBC did not to respond to a request Thursday for comment about why it tweeted a story that is roughly 16 months old.

MSNBC's Jen Psaki Defends Racial Indoctrination in Military, Blames GOP Instead.  During Sunday's [7/16/2023] edition of MSNBC's Inside with Jen Psaki, the former Biden White House Press Secretary turned full-time Democrat propagandist went on a delusional rant about how forced racial indoctrination trainings in the United States military aren't an issue because they're only an hour, all the while accusing Senators like Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) and Ted Cruz (R-TX) are the ones politicizing the military.  In reality, they are the ones trying to force the military to focus on their mission instead of pushing woke racial and gender ideology.  Psaki proclaimed it was a "right-wing conspiracy theory" that the U.S. Military is a "left-wing organization, indoctrinating troops with hundreds of hours of DEI training."

Hilarious and Sad Mika Brzezinski Defense of Biden Shows How Far Media Has Fallen.  Once upon a time, media was supposed to be about challenging those in power and asking tough questions on behalf of the American people.  But now, a lot of the liberal media are just sycophants for the Democrats, stenographers getting the talking points and spewing out what they have been given to say.  Even so far as to be in favor of shutting down speech, as we saw in the case of the Hunter Biden laptop, with some pushing the falsehood that it was Russian disinformation.  But even by that measure, MSNBC's Mika Brzezinski's take on Joe Biden hit a new level of hilarity.  According to Mika, the problem is Joe Biden's staff, not Joe Biden.  She and her husband, Joe Scarborough, were talking about Joe Biden's age when she blamed the staff for his problems.  [Tweet with video clip]

Jen Psaki's Incredible Tin-Foil Hat Conspiracy Shows What Democrats Really Think of Minorities.  [Scroll down]  That's become a topic of contention given the recent position Democrats have put themselves in with Muslims and Asian Americans.  In regard to the latter, the decision by the Supreme Court to strike down affirmative action in college admissions, which had institutionalized discrimination against Asians, left many on the left reeling and lashing out.  Some even went so far as to accuse Asian Americans of allying with "white supremacy."  But it's the left's battle with Muslims that has really raised eyebrows lately.  As RedState reported, multiple districts have been besieged by angry parents who do not want their children sexualized and taught gender ideology in school.  That's led to some outright physical confrontations with counter-protesters who are apparently really obsessed with teaching eight-year-olds they can "change" their gender.  Back to Psaki, she's got a theory about all this.  You see, it's not that Democrat policies are off-putting and morally egregious.  It's that the dastardly GOP is somehow behind Muslims not wanting to pump their kids full of puberty blockers.

Jen Psaki Claims Republicans Are Recruiting Muslims Against Transgender People.  Former White House press secretary Jen Psaki claimed Republicans are recruiting Muslims against transgender people in her Sunday episode of MSNBC's "Inside with Jen Psaki."  Psaki claimed Republicans are using former President Richard Nixon's "Southern Strategy" method by turning Muslim Americans against transgender people and, in turn, winning their vote.  "Now, decades later, the right-wing is reviving that same playbook," Psaki said.  "This time, with Muslim Americans and trans people.  Hear me out here, the GOP is trying to recruit Muslim Americans, a community that makes up less than two percent of the U.S. population against another tiny marginalized group of Americans — transgender people."

The Editor says...
The Muslims have been throwing homosexuals off rooftops for many years, back in their native lands.  [1] [2] [3] For example, homosexuality is a capital crime in Iran.  The Muslims don't take their cues from the Republicans.  They are following the Koran.

MSNBC Host Mika Brzezinski Claims Abortion Bans Will Kill Women, But None Have Died.  Pro-abortion firebrand and MSNBC host Mika Brzezinski joined New York Governor Kathy Hochul (D-NY) on Monday's Morning Joe to discuss Hochul's plans to subvert Republican pro-life legislation.  During the segment, Brzezinski made the brain busting claim that not allowing women to get abortions will leave them dead or sterilized, followed by Hochul's Freudian slip in which she called for utilizing military arsenals against those who oppose abortion.  Brzezinski dedicated the segment to Kathy Hochul's legislation that would enable abortion providers in New York to send abortion pills to women in Republican states, effectively bypassing the laws enacted in those states in the wake of RoeRoe v. Wade's repeal by the United States Supreme Court.  She, along with Hochul and activist Lauren Leader fearmongered about the necessity of abortion, and simultaneously threatened Republicans.

The Leftist Knives Are Already Coming Out for Potential Democrat Spoiler Cornel West.  Cornel West announced his run for president just days ago, but the left is already gunning for him because he represents a threat to the Democrats.  Kellyanne Conway recently pointed out that West's candidacy could decide the presidency, like Ross Perot did in 1992.  The left knows this, and therefore West must be destroyed.  MSNBC declares that Cornel West, a black Marxist, is running a campaign that has "right wing DNA" if you can believe it: [...]

Psaki: Republicans Are 'Comfortable' with Biden Because He Is an Old White Man.  Former White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Thursday on MSNBC's "The ReidOut" that the Republican base is "comfortable" with President Joe Biden because he is an older white man.  [Transcript]

If a Biden bombshell falls in the MSM forest ... where do you hear the blast?  Media outlets are already champing at the bit to serve as Joe Biden's PR department.  How else to explain all of the tough coverage of ... Joe's preference for ice cream over fish?  Or MSNBC's Stephanie Ruhle teeing up a softball question in a rare Biden one-on-one interview and not following up on his response — "My son has done nothing wrong"?  Really?  Not a single follow-up on the illegal weapons issue, not regarding his drug use, not even about his child with Lunden Roberts, whom Hunter and the Bidens have all abandoned?  That story was in the news at that same time, with Hunter trying to convince a court that he was nothing more than a destitute artist with a jet-set lifestyle.  Ruhle didn't even bother to question Biden on the propriety of answering her question, which certainly gave the appearance of a message to the DoJ.  If you want to know how seriously MSNBC's parent company takes its responsibility to hold power accountable, look no further than its decision to hire Biden flack Jen Psaki as a political analyst for Biden's re-election coverage.

Joe Biden says Hunter has done 'nothing wrong.' Really?  Let's count the ways.  In an interview with MSNBC on Friday, Biden repeated the same mantra that he has maintained since the 2020 election when his son's laptop revealed an array of possible criminal acts: Hunter has "done nothing wrong."  In the interview, Biden declared "My son has done nothing wrong.  I trust him.  I have faith in him, and it impacts my presidency by making me feel proud of him."  As with media over the last four years, MSNBC's Stephanie Ruhle did not challenge the clearly absurd statement.  Instead, she prefaced her question by stressing that there are "no ties to you" in any of his son's alleged crimes.  That is, of course, ignoring the mounting evidence of influence peddling, repeated references to the involvement of the president, and reports of a whistleblower alleging the president's involvement in a bribery scheme.

Eleven Minutes of Media Falsehoods, Just On One Subject, Just On One Station.  The plan was a comprehensive count.  With a sizable team of smart temporary hires, each looking into a different area of the #TwitterFiles, we thought counting all the mainstream news stories that would need retracting or correcting in light of information found in Twitter documents would make for an easy little sidebar, something simple for the public to digest. [...] In the Files there were around a few dozen discrete incidents in which Twitter had concerns internally, and where the public might want to know what those were.  The "Hamilton 68" fiasco, in which a think-tank called the Alliance for Securing Democracy purported to track 600 Twitter accounts linked to "Russian influence activities" but turned out to mostly be following ordinary Americans, Canadians, and British, was an example of a relatively easy fix for an editor.  If you used the Hamilton "dashboard" of accounts as a source for a story about "Russian bots," you probably needed either to retract altogether, or add a note saying the Russian-ness and bot-ness of those accounts has since been called into question.  [Video clip]

MSNBC Mentions Hamilton 68 Over 100 Times.  I had a nasty interview with Mehdi Hasan on the Mehdi Hasan Show yesterday on MSNBC.  He pointed out issues in the Twitter Files, two of which are definitely errors.  A third, about the number 22 million in the final report of Stanford's Election Integrity Partnership, will be the subject of a separate item.  In the meantime, here are over 100 instances of MSNBC talking about Russian bots in stories clearly sourced to the Hamilton 68 scam outed in the #TwitterFiles.  These quotes are pulled from a larger video mashup involving multiple channels that our own Matt Orfalea is working on for an upcoming series.

The Powerful Media Pretend They Are Powerless.  It's unintentionally laughable when cable news hosts like Rachel Maddow break in to announce that MSNBC will not be airing any of Donald Trump's post-arraignment speech live because "there's a cost to us as a news organization of knowingly broadcasting untrue things."  These pompous announcements aren't simply about what's true and what's false.  They are about how the media elites run our democracy by telling us what happenings we're all supposed to be talking about and what should be shamed out of existence.  Or take, for example, how Washington Post "Fact Checker" Glenn Kessler spit nails that conservatives are talking about George Soros throwing a million dollars at a leftist PAC right after it pledged a million dollars to Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, the man now prosecuting Trump.  Kessler proclaimed, "The intense focus on Soros is misplaced."  To connect factual dots between Soros and Bragg is "incendiary."  He's the Focus Checker instead of the Fact Checker.

John Heilemann Demanded Examples of MSNBC Dishonesty.  Here Are a Few Choice Favorites.  English comedian Russell Brand tore into MSNBC national affairs analyst John Heilemann on a recent episode of Real Time with Bill Maher after Heilemann dismissed Brand's suggestion that it is disingenuous to claim that the biases exhibited on MSNBC are any different than the biases exhibited on Fox News.  [Numerous examples in the form of Tweets]  Other moments that made the list include Heilemann calling Trump voters who booed the Ohio lieutenant governor for telling them to wear a mask "literally a death cult," as well as Heilemann's claim that then-president Trump wouldn't get vaccinated against Covid-19 because "hard-core Trump voters are anti-vaxxers," despite Trump's publicly advocating for the vaccine and ultimately receiving the jab.  Heilemann also previously called the theory that Covid-19 originated in a lab a "made-up" theory that Trump was pushing to help his reelection odds and falsely claimed that Kyle Rittenhouse was a "domestic terrorist" who drove to Kenosha, Wis., "with the intent to shoot people."  And Elliott's list, though lengthy, is far from comprehensive.

Polls? We Don't Need No Stinking Polls!  MSNBC's Mika Brzezinski Claims Biden 'Extremely Well-Liked'.  This one was almost too stupid to cover, but sometimes the really stupid silliness is hard to pass up, which is nearly always the case with anything to do with MSNBC's Morning Joe and its lovebird co-hosts, Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski. [...] Joe Biden is a disastrous president who has intentionally taken America down the wrong path since Day One of his miserable presidency.  Bottom line: Stick a fork in Joe; it's past time to kick him to the curb.  Au contraire, according to Brzezinski.  With a straight face, mind you, Mika actually declared Biden is "extremely well-liked" by the American people.

MSNBC Guest Assures Us That There's No [Incriminating] Info About Joe Biden On Hunter's Laptop.  During a Thursday appearance on MSNBC, Washington Post columnist Matt Viser desperately tried to cover for his President, assuring the audience that there's "nothing" on Hunter Biden's laptop that ties Joe Biden to any wrongdoing.  Yes, he actually said that with a straight face.  "We've spent a lot of time with [Hunter Biden's] laptop ... and there isn't much that ties the President to any wrongdoing, which I think has got to be the focus in order to be relevant" said Viser.  [Video clip]

Vaxxed To The Gills MSNBC Host Suffers Myocarditis Episode, Blames The Common Cold.  Vaccine cultists [...] have blinders on to what is happening to young, healthy people around them, as well as themselves.  Yasmin Vossoughian of MSNBC took to the air yesterday and told her story of a scary episode she had with myocarditis and blamed not the obvious experimental mRNA spike protein but rather the common cold.  [Video clip]

Vile Reid Uses MLK Day to Falsely Smear Reagan and GOP as Racists.  On MSNBC's The ReidOut, the always nasty and venomous Joy Reid used the occasion of Martin Luther King Jr Day to smear former President Ronald Reagan as a racist who signed the federal holiday into law as a cover so people wouldn't think he's racist.  This despite the fact that Reagan was never a racist and his policies did more to get African Americans off welfare and out of poverty than any President until Donald Trump.

'Not An Accurate Description': MSNBC Anchor Chides Reporter for Using 'Pro-Life' On-Air.  MSNBC anchor Andrea Mitchell chided the network's senior Capitol Hill correspondent, Garrett Haake, on Thursday for using the term "pro-life" during an on-air discussion of the Republican-backed Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Act.  The bill, which requires that medical professionals care for infants born after botched abortions, passed the House along largely partisan lines on Wednesday, with only one House Democrat, Henry Cuellar of Texas, voting with Republicans.  "At the end of the day she was, as she described herself, 'pro-life,' and that she felt that it was important to vote for these measures despite their potentially politically damaging or politically unappealing appearance," Haake said, referring to Representative Nancy Mace's (R., N.C.) support for the bill.  Mitchell interjected during Haake's response to correct his terminology.  "Let me just interrupt and say that pro-life is a term that they — an entire group wants to use — but that's not an accurate description."  "I am using it because that is the term she used to describe herself, Andrea," Haake shot back.

Twitter explodes after MSNBC health columnist calls to cancel Thanksgiving, postpone Christmas.  Prominent Twitter users erupted into a series of arguments after an MSNBC health columnist floated the idea of canceling Thanksgiving and moving winter holidays to prevent illness.  On Wednesday, Dr. Esther Choo, a professor of emergency medicine at Oregon Health and Science University, gave her thoughts on how to prevent respiratory illnesses, such as COVID-19 and RSV, during the holiday season.  She tweeted that "for so many reasons" Thanksgiving should be canceled, winter holidays should be moved to the summer, and winter holidays should be more "hygge," or cozy.

The Editor says...
I challenge you to find hygge in any dictionary, by which I mean a big dusty old book with a lot of definitions and pronunciations.  It's not only obscure, it isn't even a valid Scrabble word.

MSNBC Provides 'Exhibit A' On What Happens When Inconvenient Facts Disrupt Media Narratives.  Unquestionably, the claim by the Colorado "Club Q" mass shooting suspect's attorneys that the person identifies as "non-binary" and not a MAGA devotee has sent The Usual Suspects in the mainstream media into an absolute tailspin.  Some are conveniently pivoting, suggesting that the tragedy is still the fault of the supposed "anti-LGBTQ" rhetoric from right-wingers because of the possibility that the suspect may have been motivated by online hate allegedly directed at them.  Others seemed shocked by the report of the shooter identifying as "non-binary" so much so that they suggested in so many words that it must be a lawyerly ruse designed to get the person off the hook for the hate crime charges that are reportedly being filed against them.  But over at MSNBC, they were singing a different tune, as evidenced by a Wednesday segment of "MSNBC Reports" in which anchor Lindsey Reiser, who is married to a woman, and her panelists — including the interim deputy legal director for LGBTQ rights at the fraudulent Southern Poverty Law Center — simply ignored the story of how the suspect is said to identify and continued on with the narrative that "right-wing hate" was behind the senseless murders of five people.

MSNBC anchor slammed for complaining House Democrats never investigated the Trump family.  MSNBC's Mehdi Hasan was ridiculed Thursday for claiming that House Democrats never investigated the Trump family when they were in the majority despite many congressional investigations into former President Trump.  After Republicans secured a majority in the House, Reps.  James Comer, R.-Ky., and Jim Jordan, R-Ohio., announced in a press conference Thursday that they would be further investigating the extent of President Biden's involvement with his son Hunter's business dealings.  "The Mehdi Hasan Show" host attacked the investigation into the Biden family because, he claimed, House Democrats "didn't do this for the Trump family," while also appearing to take a swipe at outgoing House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

MSNBC Lunatics Compare Trump to Bin Laden, 9/11 Akin to Jan 6 Riots.  On Tuesday afternoon, left-wing lunatic conspiracy theorist and host of MSNBC's Deadline: White House Nicolle Wallace compared the riots at the capitol on January 6 to the barbaric terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, that killed nearly 3,000 Americans and injured thousands more.  To make matters worse, Wallace also compared former President Donald Trump to Osama Bin Laden.  Leftist New York Times reporter Luke Broadwater began by discussing the seemingly never-ending partisan January 6 committee, and what their final report will look like, said disgraced and thoroughly repudiated Congresswoman Liz Cheney has indicated that the committee wants "to keep the focus on Donald Trump" and that the committee believes its a "misdirection" to "put the blame on law enforcement" rather than those who were responsible for the capitol riots.

MSNBC Lets Go of Conspiracy Theorist Tiffany Cross.  In the same glorious week election-deniers Jake Tapper and Shepard Smith were respectively demoted and left without a show, conspiracy theorist Tiffany Cross was shown the door at MSNBC.  After two years at the far-left outlet, Cross, who hosted a Saturday show called Cross Connection, had become infamous and a running joke for spreading wild-eyed conspiracy theories, most of which were based on what you might call racial paranoia.  In the same glorious week election-deniers Jake Tapper and Shepard Smith were respectively demoted and left without a show, conspiracy theorist Tiffany Cross was shown the door at MSNBC.  After two years at the far-left outlet, Cross, who hosted a Saturday show called Cross Connection, had become infamous and a running joke for spreading wild-eyed conspiracy theories, most of which were based on what you might call racial paranoia.  From last month:  "I would say a civil war is here.  And I don't mean to be hyperbolic."

MSNBC anchors, other media pundits fuel civil war fears over midterms: 'Democracy looks like it's over'.  With the midterms less than a month away, left-leaning news outlets and political commentators are resorting to dark predictions about the future of the country with warnings of imminent civil war if Republicans retake control of Congress in November.  Talk of a second civil war among liberal journalists, television personalities and lawmakers has become increasingly commonplace following the raid on former President Trump's Mar-a-Lago home on Aug. 8, after which liberal pundits repeatedly claimed on-air that evolving distrust for the U.S. government among Trump supporters would lead to escalated political violence.  The topic resurfaced weeks later when President Biden called his predecessor and "MAGA Republicans" a threat to "the very foundations of our republic" in a controversial speech in Philadelphia.

MSNBC calls for new "energetic atheism" to combat Christian "theocracy".  The American left has plenty to complain about these days.  Liberals who support standard Democratic Party platform planks such as legal abortion, more gun control, and public schools over private schools or homeschooling, have been drenched in bad news coming from various Supreme Court cases and polls showing a widespread rejection of their agenda in the coming elections. [...] But at MSNBC's website, Zeeshan Aleem has a different target in mind.  Rather than blaming any one person or group of people for all of these woes, he's found a more pervasive evil that is the fountain from which all of these disasters are flowing.  You see, the real problem is Christianity.  Yes, it's embodied in the words and actions of many public figures who adhere to the faith, but it's the underlying religion itself that's poisoning the communal well.

MSNBC's Malcolm Nance lays out hysterical political horrors if GOP wins back Congress.  If the Republicans prevail in the upcoming midterm elections, it will be the end of democracy, future elections will be cancelled, the U.S. will become a militarized dictatorship and Congress will come to resemble the Russian Duma with weekly impeachments of President Joe Biden and VP Kamala Harris.  The fantastic prediction comes courtesy of MSNBC national security analyst Malcolm Nance, one of the left-wing network's most unhinged members on a very deep bench of cranks, hysterics and conspiracy theorists, a man whose extensive history of fascistic kookiness has endeared himself to the Resistance members.

MSNBC Analyst Says If Republicans Win They'll Cancel Elections, Impeach Biden Weekly.  MSNBC analyst Malcolm Nance predicted that a litany of horrors and injustices would certainly follow if Republicans were successful in their efforts to retake control of the House, the Senate, or both in November's midterm elections.

The Editor says...
It would be a waste of pixels to quote any further from the absurd claims put forth by Mr. Nance.

MSNBC guest faith leaders slam Supreme Court over Dobbs, reverend claims abortion is 'not a biblical topic'.  An MSNBC guest reverend vocal about her disagreement with the recent Supreme Court overturning of Roe v. Wade said Friday on "Morning Joe" that abortion is not a "biblical topic."  During a conversation with faith leaders supportive of abortion rights, co-host Mika Brzezinski asked Reverend Dr. Selene Jones about the SCOTUS decision and whether the Bible is being used "incorrectly" to curb abortion access.  Jones, who also serves as the president of the Union Theological Seminary, told Brzezinski that abortion is "not a biblical topic" and claimed there are only "one or two" biblical references to abortion that undoubtedly prioritize the "life and agency" of the mother over a fetus.

After Dobbs, MSNBC legal analyst predicts privacy will be 'abolished,' desegregation next.  MSNBC legal analyst Glenn Kirschner argued desegregation and privacy rights could vanish because of the Supreme Court's recent ruling to overturn the landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade.  The former federal prosecutor complained to New York Times columnist and MSNBC guest host Charles Blow about the spate of "horrible" decisions made by the court that upset the left, such as protecting the rights of religious schools and public prayer.  He suggested the court had given states, "unfettered power."

MSNBC's Joy Reid:  A 'Far-Right Christian Court' Is Holding Americans 'Hostage'.  MSNBC anchor Joy Ann Reid claimed Americans are being "held hostage" by a "far-right Christian court" following the Supreme Court's various rulings which she argued frequently rules "in favor of religious institutions."  Reid made the remarks on the Supreme Court's overruling of Roe v. Wade, holding in the Dobbs case that the Constitution does not include a right to abortion[.]  The far-left anchor then claimed that in a country "that's supposedly founded on the separation of church and state, we Americans find ourselves being held hostage by a far right Christian court."

MSNBC's Joy Reid asserts that Kamala Harris is not being treated fairly by the 'white, male' media.  MSNBC host and commentator Joy Reid spoke out over the weekend about what she feels is unfair media coverage of Vice President Kamala Harris.  Reid blamed the 'white, male media' for treating Harris with a bias that would not be found during the tenure of her predecessors, in an interview with The Root.  'Think about her portfolio, voting rights, immigration and the border, and police reform.  The things on her plate are the toughest things that the Biden Administration has to deal with outside of inflation and the war in Ukraine,' said Reid.  Reid blames a white, male media class for cementing a narrative about Harris that has been hard for the Vice President to overcome: 'Most of the media is still white and male.  And their take on Kamala Harris becomes the take.  It becomes conventional wisdom.'

Has MSNBC's ratings crisis caused it to start telling the truth?  Something totally unexpected happened during MSNBC's coverage of the January 6 show trial:  The network's preeminent star, Rachel Maddow, told the truth: that Trump's rally on that day had nothing to do with the Capitol breach.  Skepticism is certainly warranted, so here is video of the startling truth-telling:  [Tweet with video clip]  While it is possible that Ms. Maddow has gone rogue and is in the grip of truth fever, or is using her enormous clout there to declare her autonomy, I have to wonder if something else might be going on.  After all, CNN's new ownership has installed a boss who wants to shift the cable channel toward the center because its ratings are so awful.

MSNBC's McCaskill:  McConnell Wants Inflation to Stay High to Distract From Jan 6.  During MSNBC's recap of Thursday night's hyper-partisan January 6 committee hearings, The 11th Hour host Stephanie Ruhle brought on failed former Democrat Senator Claire McCaskill, to get her take on the fallout from the publicity stunt the Democrats put on.  After the duo gushed over the show the committee put on, the discussion turned to how the hearings will play politically.  Ruhle turned to McCaskill and asked about Republican Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell.

A Novel Interpretation Of Matthew 25.  Nancy Pelosi went on MSNBC's Morning Joe Tuesday [5/31/2022] to discuss Archbishop Salvatore Cordelione's barring her from receiving Holy Communion in his diocese.  Host Joe Scarborough opened the segment by calling the archbishop's decision "disconcerting."  He noted that "Jesus never once mentioned [abortion] in the Gospels" and instead "told His disciples in Matthew 25 that we would be welcomed into the kingdom of heaven if we gave water to the thirsty, fed the hungry, clothed the poor, and brought hope to the hopeless."  Apparently, unborn children do not qualify as "the least of these."

The Editor says...
Mr. Scarborough is very loosely paraphrasing if not misquoting the Bible, and probably would never mention any part of the Bible on TV except to use it as a political weapon.

MSNBC's Nicolle Wallace Faces 'Conflict of Interest' Questions After Disclosure Failure During Broadcasts.  A frequent guest on [Nicolle] Wallace's shows has been New York Times reporter Mike Schmidt, who [...] has been one of the leading propagandists in the mainstream media at perpetuating the Trump/Russia collusion hoax alongside another MSNBCer — Rachel Maddow — who probably more than anyone else on the network aggressively pushed the lies about the non-existent conspiracy.  Maddow also helped Schmidt promote his book, amplifying some of its claims.  One of the worst kept secrets in Beltway establishment media circles has been that Wallace, widely known as a disgruntled ex-Republican from the Bush/Cheney years and the McCain/Palin campaign, and Schmidt were dating as early as March 2019.  Despite that fact, Wallace continued to have Schmidt on her program as a guest periodically — and apparently with MSNBC's blessing — without disclosing their relationship as she amplified his work and they dished on his "scoops."

Retired general, MSNBC contributor shares 'war footage', that turned out to be from a video game.  Brian R. McCaffrey is a retired four-star general and MSNBC contributor, but on Monday the distinguished former military officer made a faux pas that he likely won't live down anytime soon.  He posted a tweet that contained what he apparently thought was actual wartime footage from the Russo-Ukraine conflict, showing what appeared to be a Russian MiG being shot down by Ukrainian missile defenses.  Twitter users, however, were quick to inform him it was actually just a clip from a video game.  McCaffrey quickly deleted the tweet and seemed to pretend the whole thing never happened.  But the beauty of the internet is that nothing can ever really be deleted, and plenty of Twitter users took a screenshot of McCaffrey's post to ensure it will forever live in infamy.

Non sequitur of the week:
Clueless Mitchell Wonders If Court Will Overturn Brown v. Board Of Education Next.  MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell wondered on her Thursday [5/12/2022] show that if the Supreme Court cares so little about precedent in Roe v. Wade, will it also overturn Brown v Board of Education.  Because her guest was former Attorney General Eric Holder, nobody pointed out that Brown is the case conservatives cite to justify overturning longstanding precedents.  Mitchell began by asking Holder about the leak of the draft opinion, "How unprecedented, first of all, is the leak?  And the way they came down in terms of breaking president, precedent, ignoring stare decisis and deciding to completely overrule Roe v. Wade after 49 years."

MSNBC Obsessively Talks About 'Racism' Every Single Day in April.  The word "racism," or a variation of the word, was used every single day in April by hosts and guests on MSNBC.  "Racism," "Racist," "Structural Racism," "Overt Racism," "Open Racism," and even "Environmental Racism" were constantly repeated on the network with zero pushback whatsoever.  Hosts and guests would also combine "racism" with other 'woke' phrases such as "sexism," "homophobia," "xenophobia," and "antisemitism."  The use of these highly charged words was generally directed toward Republican politicians and conservative voters but also toward the United States and its institutions as a whole.

MSNBC Host Warns of 'Real and Devastating Consequences' of 'Letting People Run Wild' With Free Speech.  The histrionics have also reached pay-per-view quality level, but it's all free!  The latest unintentional comedian was none other than MSNBC anchor Katy Tur, who has been making a fool out of herself for years.  Tur's effort came on Thursday, as the left's meltdown continued, first over Elon Musk acquiring 9.2 percent of Twitter, then reaching cataclysmic proportions when Musk announced a hostile takeover bid of the social media giant known for censoring conservative content at the drop of a left-wing hat, while allowing the Taliban, for example, to continue to spew its radical propaganda at will.  In a nutshell, while Musk warns that the future of democracy is at stake if free speech is suppressed, Tur and her fellow left-wing media lapdogs warn that free speech itself is a threat to democracy — a ridiculous notion made even more ridiculous by the realization that these purposely deluded people actually believe it.

MSNBC's Spin on Biden's Brutal Approval Ratings Is Beyond Comical.  You cannot make this up.  Okay, at MSNBC, you can because that's what you must do to appease your Democratic Party overlords.  The network's only reason for existing is to keep liberals from having extreme heartburn.  Yet, even with this piece of comedy, you can't polish how bad Joe Biden is doing.  Even CNN had a piece shredding the pivot they tried to pull here.  Are you ready for this?  They said that Joe Biden's approval ratings are garbage despite a "booming economy."

Morning Joe Gushes Over Biden's Putin Regime-Change GaffeMorning Joe was out in force with its shovels on Monday [3/28/2022], doing the dirty work of cleaning up after Biden's latest — and most dangerous — gaffe.  Co-host Mika Brzezinski began by claiming that Biden's regime-change gaffe was "far more tame" than President Reagan's hot mic moment in which he spoke about bombing Russia.  The difference, of course, was that Reagan was obviously joking, whereas Biden was dead serious.  And Mika praised the gaffe for having "put the Kremlin back on his heels."  Joe Scarborough agreed, saying the gaffe was "a good thing."  And in a laughable moment, he described Biden as having engaged in "psyops," forcing Putin "to sleep with one eye open."  Only a hard-core sycophant like Scarborough could keep a straight face while promoting the notion that notoriously bumbling Biden is capable of engaging in psyops.

MSNBC guest goes on deranged rant, claims Trump 'installed' as POTUS to clear way for Putin invasion.  Another MSNBC guest and so-called "journalist"/"scholar" has falsely linked Russia's invasion of Ukraine to former President Donald Trump.  Sarah Kendzior, a so-called "journalist" who even once wrote a book about Trump, claimed specifically — and without any evidence — that the former president was purposefully "installed as the president of the United States in order to weaken the alliances that were preventing Putin from achieving his goals."  "Alliances like NATO, our relationship with our European partners, our relationship with Ukraine.  Trump was put in as a bulldozer," she added.

MSNBC Discovers the True Villain of the Durham Probe:  Fox News.  On Saturday's [2/19/2022] Alex Witt Reports on MSNBC, Witt invited three Democratic operatives on to discuss the real villain of the Durham investigation:  Fox News.  [Video clip]  The only thing more amazing than the 3-0 Democratic panel was Witt then introducing the fact that she thinks this explanation justifies anything, considering that "derogatory information" was used to create a false Russia collusion narrative.  Witt first went to Kurt Bardella, declaring, "You know, it is a little bit exhausting but when the right is pushing so hard on a narrative that even Durham himself cannot buy into, it deserves a counterbalance."

MSNBC Fake News Hosts Call Canadian Truckers Protesting Vax Mandates a 'Cult'.  If the liberals weren't projecting their own identies and lies onto others, what would they do?  Have to tell the truth for once?  Listen to MSNBCs fake conservatives Joe Scarborough and Mika claim that those truckers in Canada protesting the vax mandates are nothing more than a cult.  The overwhelming amount of the videos we see from the COVID Cultists are just as tone-deaf as these two teleprompter puppets.  99% of the insults they throw at others actually apply to them and those who agree with them, the second you wake up and realize that, the sooner you'll realize how much you've been lied to and gaslighted for years.

"'White' Conservatives Are 'Selfish' & 'Don't Play Well With Others'" Says MSNBC Host.  It doesn't take a rocket scientist to deduce just how ignorant MSNBC host Joy Reid truly is.  She doesn't know anything about American history (or the constitution), yet is allowed to have her own show dedicated to keeping people in the dark.  Better yet, she still claims she's oppressed. [...] [Video clip]  This is exactly what happens when inmates are allowed to run the asylum.  When children are in charge, the country falls apart.  It is really that simple.  How Reid has her own show on any channel is a question that may never be answered.

Joy Reid Show Tells Blatant Lie About the Death of Officer Brian Sicknick.  We've seen Twitter seemingly jump at the chance to kick Republicans off of its platform for the excuse of "misinformation."  Yet, there's a boatload of out-and-out lies that are pedaled [sic] by those on the left and in liberal media daily — and Twitter doesn't seem to [care] about those.  Take Joy Reid.  Please. [...] We saw her media malpractice with her comments about Kyle Rittenhouse, Brett Kavanaugh, and "white male tears."  Then she attacked Nicki Minaj and defended her prior vaccine hesitancy by blaming President Donald Trump.  "Why would any sensible person take a vaccine Trump had anything to do with?" she said.  But now, of course, she has taken that Trump vaccine because somehow, Biden being in the office makes it safe?  The logic of these folks just blows my mind.  Reid also promoted the slimy "DeSantis is missing" conspiracy.  She's still pushing it, even after it's been fully debunked by local media.  He was never missing and continued to work while taking his wife to cancer treatments.  Yet Reid and others still can't stop the lies.

MSNBC and Leftist Activist Claim Bidens 'Build Back Better' Bill will Stop Tornadoes.  In yet another ridiculous segment on MSNBC, the host and a leftist activist seem to agree that the only way to stop tornadoes like the one that ravaged Mayfield, Kentucky from happening again, is to pass one of the largest bills in history which will add trillions to our national debt, Build Back Better.  The leftists honestly believe they can tie any and every thing into climate change so they can destroy the Western world, despite China spewing more of the gasses they claim is destroying the world than the top nations, combined!  Which is currently destroying Western economies as China continues to ignore it and make even more money.  [Video clip]

Joy Reid Makes Ridiculous Claim That Gun Laws Are Based on White Supremacy.  They're everywhere, they're everywhere!  "They" being "white supremacists," of course.  Not that we didn't already know MSNBC's Joy Reid is without question the most bitterly race-obsessed individual in the "news media" — if not on the planet — but almost literally, every time this race hustler opens her silly mouth to spew even more racially-divisive nonsense, she ups her pathetic game.

I'm Thankful For Joy Reid.  In the year since last Thanksgiving, no one has been more influential in shaping the course of my career than MSNBC's Joy Reid.  Others on the left come close, but no one is quite as good at representing, day in and day out, just how awful Democrats and the media have become.  Watching Reid's show is the surest way to get a sense of where the left's depravity stands and where it's headed.  Her program has been a godsend in providing me with direction in explaining and answering any given lie that Democrats and the media are excitedly spreading.  Whatever Reid says, odds are you can count on the opposite being the truth.

Are MSNBC advertisers watching what they are sponsoring?  My guess is that MSNBC hosts know that nobody is watching them, and that they have to make outrageous remarks to get attention.  At the same time, do the advertisers on these shows know what the hosts are saying about their fellow Americans?

How long can MSNBC viewers fall for the lies?  Watching MSNBC you'll be told that Critical Race Theory is not being taught in public schools.  As I explained last week, while the original CRT texts probably aren't being presented, lessons are being rammed down kids' throats that put them into two camps for instance, oppressors and oppressed.  And that America is incurably racist — well there is a cure.  And that is of course CRT, even though it might be labeled "equity training."  That conversation is morphing into their belief that conservatives don't want racial history, including slavery, taught in schools.  That's just made-up nonsense.  Just this morning on some MSNBC program called Velshi, one of the panelists made the claim that many of the protesters who spoke up at school board meetings aren't parents, or perhaps she said they don't have children at those schools.  No matter.  For instance as taxpayers these patriots have a right to voice their opinion on how the biggest part of their property tax bill is spent.  Secondly if we take that twisted logic further, then Randi Weingarten, the president of the American Federation of Teachers, who has no children, should have no voice in how are youngsters are educated.

No Mainstream 'Journalist' Is More Racist Than MSNBC's Joy Reid.  Joy Reid is at it again.  Well, she never really ceased her bigotry.  Reid used to run a blog where she often engaged in anti-gay and anti-Muslim rhetoric.  The ignoble provocateur eventually figured out that her target audience didn't like that, so she found a new group of people to hate: the white folks, especially heterosexual conservatives (including teenage boys).  These are Reid's latest 85 seconds of desperate racial invective:  [Video clip] [...] At some point, might Comcast decide anti-white racism is not something to subsidize and pull the plug on Reid, as they did with the execrable Keith Olbermann a decade ago?  Much of her odiousness, sadly, reminds me of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories.  Constantly blaming all the world's ills on one group of people — effectively vilifying them — should not be tolerated by MSNBC.

MSNBC host Declares The Entire Trucking Industry to be RACIST.  For a station that claims to be trying to fight misinformation, MSNBC sure does put out a lot of it.  For example, listen as this MSNBC host and her guest declare the supply chain crisis is being caused by the "racist white men" who control the trucking industry to make Joe Biden look bad.  What they fail to mention is the fact the overwhelming majority of the supply chain crisis is actually from the ports not being allowed to do as many ships as they normally do in states like California.  [Video clip]

MSNBC Demonizes Concerned Parents As 'Radicalized' 'Far Right Threat'.  Sunday night [10/24/2021] MSNBC went all out smearing parents in the Northern Virginia suburbs of Loudoun County as domestic terrorists.  On Alicia Menendez's American Voices, the MSNBC host and her far-left guest cruelly painted parents standing up to school boards, including a father whose daughter was allegedly raped by a transgender student on campus because of the schools' liberal policies, as radical rioters who were like the January 6 "insurrectionists."  Menendez set up the smear campaign against concerned parents with a graphic that read, "The Radicalized Right" in big bold letters at the bottom of the screen and "Threats of Violence" in the top corner.  Terry McAuliffe, the Democrat running in the state's gubernatorial race is facing backlash for saying parents don't have a say in their child's education.  There has been uprisings from parents across the country, including in Virginia, over Critical Race Theory and transgender bathroom policies.

MSNBC host Jonathan Capehart calls Trump supporters 'more worrisome' than the Taliban or ISIS.  On the eve of the 20th anniversary of 9/11, MSNBC host Jonathan Capehart announced that he believed that Trump supporters are more of a threat than the Taliban or ISIS.  Capehart called out 'MAGA and the domestic threat', which he said was far 'more worrisome than any foreign threat', during an appearance at PBS NewsHour on Friday [9/10/2021].  The Washington Post columnist and news host went on to describe the last several years as 'one giant step forward, and then two giant steps back.'

Deranged MSNBC: '95%' of Americans Agree With Biden (They Don't).  Following President Biden's address to the nation in which he doubled down on his horrific failure in Afghanistan, MSNBC's left-wing propagandist Nicolle Wallace was equally detached from reality as she falsely claimed the vast majority of Americans agreed with the disastrous policy — despite the opposite being true.  She even attacked the media for not being supportive enough of Biden. [...] Wallace went full White House hack, imagining a fantasy in which the public were happy with Biden's shameful mishandling of Afghanistan:  ["]Well, I'm going to say two things, and both hard to say.  But I'll say them anyway because here they are.  95% of the American people will agree with everything he just said.  95% of the press covering this White House will disagree. [...] ["] [...] Moments later, she admitted she had no idea what she was talking about:  "We haven't seen much public opinion polling on this because it's happened so quickly."  Luckily, such polling does exist — it shows that 70% of the American people disapprove of how Biden is handling the catastrophe in Afghanistan that he created.

Cable News 'Death Cult' Craziness Goes Unpunished.  One of the regular tropes of liberal cable news in recent weeks is applauding how Big Tech is censoring any politicians or other leaders who are spreading misinformation about the coronavirus.  They cheer when Sen. Rand Paul gets blocked by YouTube, for example, for questioning the effectiveness of masks.  But these same liberal cable networks are spewing wild misinformation about the coronavirus.... when it comes to smearing conservatives and Republicans.  You can call them murderers and terrorists, and the "independent fact checkers" and the social-media sites yawn and do nothing.  These wild-eyed lies are somehow considered fair game.  For example, on MSNBC's Morning Joe on August 9, co-host Mika Brzezinski used the word "death cult" eight times to talk about governors like Ron DeSantis.  She sneered that the Delta variant was the "DeSantis variant."  DeSantis has encouraged vaccines and worked to protect senior citizens from dying of COVID much more effectively than say, Andrew Cuomo.

CNN, MSNBC's ratings collapse due to 'serious credibility problem' covering Biden, experts say.  The second quarter of 2021 saw viewers ditch CNN and MSNBC in droves as experts wonder if the liberal networks can ever recover from a "serious credibility problem" they created by relying on former President Donald Trump for success while ignoring internal gaffes and scandals.  "CNN and MSNBC were one-trick ponies, and that trick was bashing Trump," Cornell Law School professor and media critic William A. Jacobson told Fox News.  "Now that Trump no longer is president, they have tried to keep up the mania, but it's hard.  The audience has disappeared because it never was loyal to CNN and MSNBC hosts, it was loyal to Trump hatred," Jacobson added.  "It's not hard to imagine executives at CNN and MSNBC saying nightly prayers that Trump runs for president in 2024."

Judge Rules Rachel Maddow's Show Isn't News.  I've never actually watched a full episode of Rachel Maddow's show on MSNBC, but based on the clips I've seen, there's no doubt that it is left-wing propaganda, not news.  And a federal judge apparently agrees with that.  Journalist Glenn Greenwald reports that an Obama-appointed judge ruled last month that "Maddow's show is different than a typical news segment where anchors inform viewers about the daily news."

A Court Ruled Rachel Maddow's Viewers Know She Offers Exaggeration and Opinion, Not Facts.  MSNBC's top-rated host Rachel Maddow devoted a segment in 2019 to accusing the right-wing cable outlet One America News (OAN) of being a paid propaganda outlet for the Kremlin.  Discussing a Daily Beast article which noted that one OAN reporter was a "Russian national" who was simultaneously writing copy for the Russian-owned outlet Sputnik on a freelance contract, Maddow escalated the allegation greatly into a broad claim about OAN's real identity and purpose:  "in this case," she announced, "the most obsequiously pro-Trump right wing news outlet in America really literally is paid Russian propaganda."  In response, OAN sued Maddow, MSNBC, and its parent corporation Comcast, Inc. for defamation, alleging that it was demonstrably false that the network, in Maddow's words, "literally is paid Russian propaganda."  In an oddly overlooked ruling, an Obama-appointed federal judge, Cynthia Bashant, dismissed the lawsuit on the ground that even Maddow's own audience understands that her show consists of exaggeration, hyperbole, and pure opinion, and therefore would not assume that such outlandish accusations are factually true even when she uses the language of certainty and truth when presenting them ("literally is paid Russian propaganda").

How Corrupt Is MSNBC? The Network [is] Now OPENLY Lobbying to Pack the Supreme Court.  When he's not guest hosting MSNBC's The Cross Connection, Jason Johnson is a politics and journalism professor at Morgan State University, which does not inspire confidence in the next generation of journalists as he warned on Saturday [6/12/2021] of "catastrophic implications" of the Supreme Court's 6-3 conservative balance and condemned Sen. Mitch McConnell for not allowing President Biden to pack the Court.  Johnson's monologue was the result of a question from a viewer wondering what "we" have to do to make the Court more "fair and balanced" and representative of the "diverse country in which we live."

MSNBC Hack Melts Down Trying to Turn Voters Against Trump: 'What If Trump Kills Someone?'  MSNBC left-wing contributor Donny Deutsch really wants people to stop supporting Donald Trump.  During a segment on MSNBC, Deutsch had quite the meltdown trying to "convince" people that they shouldn't support Trump.  At one point, he shouted "what if Trump kills someone" before them insulting Americans by saying "even then" they wouldn't stop supporting the former president.  [Video clip]

MSNBC Sees 'Death Sentence' for Biden Agenda, End of Republic.  To say that the Democratic hacks posing as hosts at MSNBC are panicked is an understatement.  On Monday, Nicolle Wallace lashed out at Senator Joe Manchin's announcement that the moderate Democrat will not be voting for the radical attempt to federalize voting in this country, calling it a political "death sentence" for Biden that might lead to the fall of the Republic.  Deadline:  White House host Wallace opened the show with hyperbolic gloom:  "West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin has, wittingly or unfittingly, ushered in an official death sentence for most of the Biden agenda by enacting a brand new standard for legislation, claiming that he will not back legislation that doesn't have bipartisan support."

Nicolle Wallace brings the hard-hitting journalism, asks James Clyburn: 'I need you to fill me up with wisdom'.  In an interview oddly reminiscent of Brian Stelter's softball questioning of White House press secretary Jen Psaki, MSNBC anchor Nicolle Wallace sat down with Democratic Majority Whip James Clyburn to discuss the House's voting rights legislation better known as the "For the People Act."  Wallace opened up the cringeworthy interview on "Deadline:  White House" Monday [6/7/2021] by telling Clyburn:  "I'm going to be really brief because I just need you to fill me up with wisdom here."  She continued with an attack on Republicans in general:  "But, the Republicans, I spent time in that party, this is their whole game.  This is a maniacal, urgent, front burner, back burner, middle burner issue and they won't stop until there are voter suppression laws on the books... that if the election of 2020 had taken place with those laws on the books, they might of been able to do what they're still trying to do, overthrow the will of the voters.  It disproportionately hurts black voters, minority voters, and young voters.  How do you fight back if all the Democrats in Washington don't see it that way?"

Brian Williams Pushes Ad Likening Antifa Terrorists to American Patriots.  On Friday night [6/4/2021], MSNBC host Brian Williams collaborated with the Lincoln Project in giving free publicity to the far-left Antifa terrorist group by shamelessly exploiting the Normandy invasion that was pivotal to defeating the Nazis in Europe.  Williams — who still has not informed viewers of the Lincoln Project's ethical problems — concluded the show by showing the group's new ad lauding Antifa members, likening them to World War II patriots.  [Video clip]

Ted Cruz attacks Brian Williams after the MSNBC anchor labeled him 'Kremlin Cruz' for 'peddling Russian propaganda'.  Ted Cruz has torn into 'corrupt' Brian Williams, accusing him of being beholden to 'corporate overlords' after the MSNBC anchor said Cruz was promoting 'Russian propaganda'.  The war of words erupted after Cruz criticized the US Army's new recruitment video as promoting a 'woke, emasculated military', while contrasting it with a Russian military ad.  Williams accused the Texas Senator of a 'remarkably stupid lapse in judgment' on his MSNBC show Friday [5/21/2021], and suggested he be referred to as 'Kremlin Cruz.'

MSNBC Contributor Calls Republicans 'White Nationalists' Who Support Terrorism.  MSNBC contributor Dean Obeidallah said Sunday [5/23/2021] all Republicans are white nationalists who defend terrorism.  "In the GOP today, you're either defending a terrorist or you're out of the GOP.  That's where they are," said the host of SiriusXM Progress' "The Dean Obeidallah Show."  "It's the party we're dealing with.  They're not a political party, they're a white nationalist movement.  They're a fascist threat to our nation.  That's not hyperbolic, that's academic."

MSNBC'S Joe Scarborough Spreads Debunked Lie:  Trump Rioters Came to Capitol to 'Kill Cops'.  MSNBC host Joe Scarborough continued the left's revisionist history of the January 6th Capitol Riots by conjuring up Trump supporters who went to the protest to "kill cops."  "The police had guns drawn to stop the insurrections from coming in and killing members of the House," Scarborough said.  "So, yes, they're lying."  Joe Scarborough is the one who is lying.  In January, days after the Capitol riots, the myth that "capture and kill" teams were among the protesters was debunked.

Disgusting MSNBC: Pro-Life Conservatives 'Won't Be Happy' Until Rape Victims Are in Jail.  MSNBC was one step away from saying we were literally in "The Handmaid's Tale", Monday afternoon.  Host Nicolle Wallace and her frenzied feminist panel spent the first twenty minutes of her show hysterically panicking over news that the Supreme Court would be eventually ruling on a Mississippi abortion law that passed in 2018.  The state law bans abortions after 15 weeks where the mother or baby was not in danger.  Apparently, that is radical and extreme to the majority of Americans, at least according to MSNBC's Wallace.  She declared, "Just the decision to take up this case really strikes fear in the hearts of everyone who cares about this issue, which if you look at polls is 65% of Americans that support reproductive freedoms."  Former Democrat Senator and MSNBC analyst Claire McCaskill then lectured women younger than her who don't remember life before Roe while she savagely smeared pro-life advocates as callous to rape victims: [...]

Rebekah Jones, the COVID Whistleblower Who Wasn't.  This is a story about Rebekah Jones, a former dashboard manager at the Florida Department of Health (FDOH), who has single-handedly managed to convince millions of Americans that Governor Ron DeSantis has been fudging the state's COVID-19 data.  When I write "single-handedly," I mean it, for Jones is not one of the people who have advanced this conspiracy theory but rather is the person who has advanced this conspiracy theory.  It has been repeated by others, sure:  by partisans across the Internet, by unscrupulous Florida Democrats such as Nikki Fried and Charlie Crist, and on television, by MSNBC in particular.

Bill Nye ain't no science guy.  Bill Nye took his act to MSNBC over the weekend.  His latest pseudo-science screed was aimed at anti-vaxxers, Tucker Carlson, and rascally conservatives. [...] Perhaps Nye's shtick is running on bald tires, and the left-of-Pravda network was the only place he could find airtime.  Regardless, his diatribe had so many holes that it needed an "under construction" sign.  In a nutshell, Nye stated that it is reasonable to demand that Americans be required to take the COVID vaccine.  He rested his statist claim on a specious presentation of false equivalences.  It seemed as if he would break his arm, patting himself on the back for such a "slam dunk." In typical Bill Nye fashion, his smugness, no doubt, beguiled the MSNBC audience and obscured his ignorance of logic.  Nye's conclusion was the product of a series of logical fallacies.  In less than four minutes of airtime, "The Science Guy" made eight unforced errors in a feeble attempt at crafting a pro-vaccine argument on Mehdi Hasan's show.

MSNBC Blames Ronald Reagan For Atlanta Shootings.  Democrats have been working overtime to spin last week's horrific shooting spree in Atlanta into a mythical war on Asians.  Their effort would seek to entice another important demographic group into finding refuge inside their party's "big tent", all so they can radically remake America to their liking.  Liberal politicians along with their activist mouthpieces in the media have sought to blame the rampage on Republicans, (including former President Donald J. Trump and his supporters) who continue to be demonized and smeared as domestic terrorists and extremists.

Morning Joe Calls Businesses Destroyed in BLM, Antifa Riots Nothing More Than 'Taco Stands'.  'Morning Joe' Scarborough faced a growing backlash on social media Tuesday after diminishing family-run businesses destroyed in 'Black Lives Matter' and Antifa protests over the summer as nothing more than "taco stands."  "No, [...] I'm not going to confuse a taco stand with the United States Capitol.  I'm not going to confuse the selling of tacos with actually moving through a Constitutional process," said Morning Joe.  Economists say thousands of businesses were torched in major cities across the country resulting in tens of billions of dollars in damages and insurance pay-outs.

Katy Tur Tries to Gaslight Over 'Insurrection'.  Katy Tur has never been known as a straight shooter.  One of the more partisan voices on MSNBC (and that's saying something), she presents herself as a hard news anchor while finding it absolutely impossible to not let her left-wing bias show through.  At one point, she compared journalists to fire fighters, rushing into burning buildings because there's no more a delusional group of people on the planet than those who work in the legacy news industry. [...] Perhaps Tur was comatose over last summer's festivities.  The rest of us recall the court houses on fire, the police precincts burned down, the stores looted, the violent political demands of groups like Black Lives Matter, and the dozens of people killed and murdered.  In fact, if we want to get technical, the only recent example of a real insurrection happened in Seattle, where a group of lefty nut jobs setup an "autonomous" zone that ended up in multiple people dead.

Brzezinski declares 'you are not a patriot' if you don't support impeachment over Capitol riot.  Is the Trump-hating left trying to steal the term "patriot" from conservatives who have essentially owned the word since the tea party days?  Progressives are forever trying to manipulate language to persuade a leery public, and on Wednesday [2/10/2021] MSNBC host Mika Brzezinski declared "You're not a patriot if you can't see what happened here."  Brzezinski was talking about the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, targeting Republican lawmakers who do not support former President Donald Trump being impeached for allegedly inciting violence.  She pressed the point that the violent few who broke away from an earlier "Stop the Steal" rally "came because of Trump.  And everybody knows it."

MSNBC's Jason Johnson:  Democrats Need to Say Republicans Are 'Terrorists'.  MSNBC political analyst Jason Johnson said Wednesday [1/27/2021] on "Deadline" that citing the example of QAnon supporter Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) that Democrats should declare all Republicans are "terrorists," adding "you can't negotiate, you can't legislate and you can't work with terrorists."

MSNBC: How Do We 'Deprogram' Millions of Racist, Violent Trump Supporters?  Nikole Hannah-Jones, of the NYT's 1619 Project, appeared on MSNBC's Morning Joe Tuesday, to join the panel in attacking Senators Josh Hawley and Ted Cruz, as well as the 74 million Americans who voted for President Trump this past election as evil racists akin to the KKK.  Panelist Eugene Robinson from The Washington Post even demanded "millions" of Americans needed to be "deprogrammed."  The disgusting segment began with co-host Joe Scarborough posing to Hannah Jones that Trump supporters were actually well-educated and wealthy Americans (such as these two Senators), and not blue collar rubes, as the narrative goes.  This led to an obnoxious condescending sermon from Hannah Jones: [...] MSNBC's race-baiting, Republican bashing propaganda was paid for by advertisers Allstate, TD Ameritrade, and Sleep Number, whom you can contact at the Conservatives Fight Back page here.

Hilarious: MSNBC's Al Sharpton Repeatedly Insists He's 'Nonpartisan'.  During MSNBC's live coverage of the Georgia Senate runoff election, race hustler and longtime PoliticsNation host Al Sharpton reveled in the possible victories of Democrats Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock by insisting that he and his fellow civil rights activists are "nonpartisan" individuals concerned about the direction of the country.  Former liberal Republican-turned-leftist and MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace introduced Sharpton by insisting that the election has not only hinged on "issues of...race" and "issues of identity," but also "how extraordinarily disciplined the candidates on the Democratic side have been."

Florida vs New York — Media Bias.  [Thread reader]  As of today, NY's deaths per 100k from coronavirus (188) is about double Florida's (96).  Florida and Gov. DeSantis seem to be doing something right in that regard.  But you would have no idea that was the case if you spend your days listening/watching/reading MSNBC. [...] I'll pause here to drive the point home: by the most critical metric, deaths per capita, DeSantis has outperformed Cuomo enormously.  Cuomo's led one of the most disastrous crisis responses in US history.  If NY were a country it'd have the highest death per capita IN THE WORLD.

The Worst People In Media 2020.  [#1] Joy Reid.  Liberals fail up.  There's really no other explanation as to why this conspiracy theorist who only takes a break from lying to make a complete fool of herself would get a new show on MSNBC. The fraud who lied about her blog being hacked to cover up her history of homophobia had been relegated to an unwatched weekend slot, but now she's back in the big leagues.  Why?  Why not?  When you have no standards, when you set the bar so low it's laying on the ground, anyone can clear it.  How else could anyone explain elevating someone so blatantly stupid, not to mention racist?  Maybe next year we'll finally get an answer from the FBI about who posted all those homophobic and transphobic things on her old blog?  Don't hold your breath.

Stacey Abrams isn't unsung by any means.  She self-sings constantly!
What?! MSNBC Hails Stacey Abrams, One of 2020's 'Unsung Heroes'.  MSNBC hosts Al Sharpton, Ali Velshi and Joy Reid celebrated their network's annual "Revvies" awards Sunday night on PoliticsNation.  The virtual awards show split its time between bashing the "worst of the year" (everything Trump) and hailing the "best of the year" from far-left activists and Democrats.  "MSNBC Republican" strategist Susan Del Percio also joined the panel of judges.  Opening the show by bashing Republicans and the President with their "ridicu-list," they moved onto the President's "worst moments," which included the "suggest[ion] of injecting bleach."  President Trump won the most "blueberry pie" on their face award, with runner ups Rudy Giuliani, Brad Parscale, and Sidney Powell.  This typical hyper-partisan spin was then followed by gooey praise for the left.  For their "Unsung Hero of 2020" Award, Sharpton actually nominated failed 2018 gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams, who has gotten almost as much praise as Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.

The worst-case scenario is the only one that sells newspapers, books, or cable news.
MSNBC Doom and Gloom Doc:  Don't Get Overly Optimistic About the Covid-19 Vaccine, We're in For a "Decades-Long Battle".  MSNBC rolled out a doom and gloom doc Thursday morning [12/24/2020] who warned Americans not to get overly optimistic about a Covid vaccine because we are in for a "decades-long battle."  Dr. William Haseltine promoted his books on Covid as he fear-mongered.  Dr. Haseltine doesn't want Americans to forget about Covid and go on with their lives because he has books to sell.

MSNBC Hack Steve Schmidt Compares Trump Supporters To '20s Or 30s' Nazi Germany.  MSNBC contributor Steve Schmidt proved once again he's a liberal hack who will say the most outrageous things imaginable about Trump supporters.  During an interview on "Deadline," Schmidt — a Never-Trumper who cofounded The Lincoln Project — compared supporters of President Donald Trump marching in Washington, D.C., over the weekend to brownshirts from Fascist Italy or Nazi Germany in the "1920s or 1930s."  "But we should all be terrified of what we saw this weekend in Washington, D.C., and we should think about it," Schmidt said.  "What is it that we saw this weekend in Washington?  What was it?  They weren't wearing brown and black uniforms like they would have in Italy or in Germany in the 1920s or 1930s, but they're the same people," he continued.

Jon Meacham Loses MSNBC Contributor Gig for Failure to Disclose Biden WorkNewsweek-killer and now disgraced Jon Meacham lost his job as an MSNBC contributor after failing to disclose the work he'd done for presidential candidate Joe Biden, reports the far-left New York Times.  Oh, and Meacham also went on the air and praised a speech he helped write without disclosing he helped write it.

MSNBC Balloonhead Chris Hayes Claims Confirming Justice ACB Led to 100,000 Deaths.  Last night [10/287/2020], Chris Hayes, a mainstream media balloonhead who doesn't get nearly enough credit for his ridiculousness and over-the-top sensationalism, made one of the most mind-bending non-sequitur statements I have ever seen.  Hayes claims that Republican's confirmation of now Justice Amy Coney Barrett has cost 100,000 American lives.  [Video clip]  According to Hayes, the confirmation of Amy Coney Barrett was a Republican priority because it can't be reversed, but also what can't be reversed are the deaths of "probably 100,000 Americans."  Yes, listen to the mainstream media who tells you that Republicans cause deaths by filling an empty seat on the Supreme Court.

Brzezinski on Trump Returning to WH from COVID Bout: 'Isn't This Manslaughter?'  MSNBC's "Morning Joe" co-host Mika Brzezinski on Tuesday asked if President Donald Trump could be guilty of "manslaughter" if he got someone at the White House sick and they eventually died as a result of his having the coronavirus.  Brzezinski said she hopes it does not happen, but asked host Joe Scarborough if Trump is endangering the lives of members of the Secret Service by exposing them "to his deadly virus."

The Editor says...
Apparently it ain't that deadly, Mika.  And since nobody died as a result of this incident, it's not manslaughter.

Ten Great Deceptions Designed to Destroy the Republic.  There are at least 10 major lies that are now so ubiquitous that most people never question them: [...] Lie #10 — If It's On Television, It's True:  They wouldn't lie, would they?  Wish it were so.  Marketing, and corporate-subsidized news networks, are all about spin.  Truth is never paramount.  I mean, what good would it do to spend millions of dollars coaxing the public to buy a product that's "kinda okay?"  It has to be subliminally attached to a need that drives us to make purchases that are irrational.  Lying is breathing in marketing.  One of the most egregious lies I've ever seen:  Ali Velshi, in an MSNBC report, is standing in front of a burning police precinct claiming the riots were just protests and not really "unruly."  What does lying like that do to a person?  To a soul?

Progs furious at MSNBC's 'historic first' Black weekday evening host, Joy Reid.  It's one thing to spout Hamas propaganda, get her facts all wrong about Hillary Clinton's email scandal, or even lie about people hacking her blog posts to evade responsibility for what she wrote.  It's quite another to imply anything negative about Muslims on MSNBC's programming.  Even if spreading the latest phony progressive talking point that Trump-supporters are responsible for the BLM/Antifa riots... because they are acting the way "Muslims act." [...] MSNBC took a gamble when it plucked Reid from the ratings hell of weekend mornings to replace Chris Matthews in its prized 7 P.M. weekday time slot.  Matthews had "resigned" following pressure over remarks and behavior criticized as sexist, and after rotating various substitutes through guest hosting, the network opted for another "historic first" with the first black cable news host of a weekday evening show.  It's interesting that nobody seems to be calling for her firing, which I attribute to "historic first privilege."

MSNBC's Joy Reid Doubles Down on 'Way Muslims Act' Remarks That Sparked Outrage.  MSNBC host Joy Reid on Wednesday night [9/2/2020] said she should have been more "sensitive" two days earlier when she seemingly compared radicalized Trump supporters to "the way Muslims act," remarks that sparked outrage among Muslim activists and organizations.  More specifically, it was a non-apology. [...] After noting anti-Muslim stereotypes have been prevalent in media and entertainment, Reid then wondered aloud why there was a double standard when it came to describing extremism among white right-wingers compared to Muslim terrorism, taking aim at how the president has radicalized his base.  "It's the misportrayal that is the problem," she stated.  "We're all too quick to call out those who radicalize young men who are vulnerable.  There have been treatments of this all over cable news for years.  But when white Christians are radicalized, we don't react the same way."

MSNBC Blames Fox for Trump Not Being Blamed for Riots.  On Friday's [8/28/2020] The Last Word on MSNBC, fill-in host Katy Tur presided over a panel discussion which placed the blame for recent rioting on President Donald Trump, and also blamed Fox News for convincing Trump voters not see him as responsible.  MSNBC contributor Yamiche Alcindor — who is also a correspondent for PBS NewsHour — recalled that President Trump has been trying to incorporate concerns over rioting into his campaign message, and then cited new polling suggesting that independents are turning against the Black Lives Matter movement because of the "chaos."  She concluded by fretting that the "peaceful message" of BLM is being "conflated" with "out of control rioters."  [Video clip]

MSNBC Blames Racism for Voters Preferring Trump on Economy.  Once again proving that the liberal media can interpret an ulterior motive of racism by conservatives into any issue, MSNBC host Katy Tur and MSNBC Republican contributor Michael Steele hinted on Tuesday afternoon [8/18/2020] that racism has the reason why so many voters have told pollsters they prefer President Donald Trump to better handle the economy than Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden.  As the two discussed why Trump still has high ratings on the economy despite the decline it has taken since the pandemic, the two talked in circles a bit before Steele finally suggested that it was the "ugliness" of suburban whites not wanting minorities moving into their neighborhoods that was driving pro-Trump sentiment expressed to pollsters.

Trump team accuses MSNBC of doctoring photo to hide Biden notes for Harris video call.  Cable news network MSNBC is being accused of doctoring a photo of 2020 presidential candidate Joe Biden following his announcement of California Sen. Kamala Harris as his running mate.  The Biden campaign released a photo of Biden speaking to Harris via video call, and critics quickly pointed out what appeared to be notes prompting Biden what to say on the call.  The Trump campaign accused MSNBC of editing the notes out, according to Fox News.  "MSNBC cropped the photo of Joe Biden video chatting with Kamala Harris, removing Biden's talking points from the image," the Republican National Committee's rapid response director, Steve Guest, posted on Twitter.  "It's an embarrassment Biden needed talking points to talk to his own VP.  Biden is clearly a puppet of the left."

MSNBC Host Blames Trump For Herman Cain's Death.  Mika Brzezinski, co-host of MSNBC's "Morning Joe," went well out of her way to malign President Trump on Thursday, saying he's to blame for the death of former Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain.  "Just the facts — Herman Cain went to the @realDonaldTrump TULSA SUPERSPREADER rally -no mask.  The campaign squashed people close so the crowd would look bigger.  They cheered for their President for hours.  Cain tested positive for COVID nine days later.  Now Herman Cain is dead," she wrote on Twitter.

MSNBC's Brian Williams Whacks Federal Agents as 'Jackbooted Thugs,' Invokes Mussolini.  Twenty-five years ago, former president George H.W. Bush quit the National Rifle Association over a fundraising letter which referred to federal law enforcement as "jackbooted thugs."  This delighted the media elites then.  The script has flipped.  Now the term is welcomed by left-wing media outlets.  Several times this week, MSNBC host Brian Williams has used his primetime show The 11th Hour to hype Twitter comments by never-Trumper MSNBC contributor Steve Schmidt in which the bitter former Republican slammed federal agents in Portland as "jackbooted thugs" and "stormtroopers."  On Wednesday's [7/22/2020] show, the MSNBC host even had Schmidt on as a guest and gave him a platform to further bash federal agents, with Williams provocatively invoking Benito Mussolini's Italy.

This might be the lie of the year.
Todd: MSNBC's Daytime Newscasts Have 'No Editorial Point of View'.  At the end of an interview with Trump Campaign Director of Communications Tim Murtaugh on Wednesday's "MSNBC Live," NBC host Chuck Todd stated that "there is no editorial point of view here on any of these newscasts on MSNBC in the daytime."  Murtaugh responded to a question from Todd's co-host, Katy Tur, on the safety of Trump's events by stating that the Trump rallies took precautions and argued that Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt's (R) coronavirus diagnosis could not be pinned on the rally in Oklahoma because it took place 25 days after the rally.

Walter Duranty Is Alive, Well, And Spreading Fake News About CHOP.  Newsbusters has diligently captured some of the cartoonish coverage attached to the "Summer of Love," Mayor Durkan's quickly discarded term for the chaos in her own city.  Here's just one example:  As early as June 12, Seattle Police Chief Carmen Best told local reporters:  "Rapes, robberies, and all sorts of violent acts have been occurring in the area that we're not able to get to."  But a day later, Dan Simon, a correspondent for self-proclaimed "Facts First" network CNN, claimed on camera:  "The facts on the ground indicate that this is an entirely peaceful situation."  MSNBC followed suit, along with other reports from CNN. "This has been the mostly peaceful week these streets have seen," added an MSNBC reporter on the periphery of the zone.  The New York Times did all it could to spin on the zone's behalf early on. [...] It's reminiscent of MSNBC's Ali Velshi describing an early George Floyd-themed protest as "peaceful" while an inferno raged behind him.  "I wanna be clear on how I characterize this," said Velshi, reporting live from Minneapolis.  "This is mostly a protest, it is not, it is not, generally speaking, unruly."  Velshi's inept reportage quickly went viral.

Celebrating the Talented Members of the MSNBC All-Decade Team.  [For example] Joy-Ann Reid:  Forced to apologize, but never punished, for a series of homophobic blog posts that resurfaced in 2018. Despite apologizing and accepting responsibility for the posts, Reid later claimed she was the victim of a malicious hacker who planted "fabricated" posts on her old blog.  FBI cybersecurity experts were called in to investigate, but have yet to identify the hacker.  Brian Williams:  Suspended in 2015 for telling false war stories about coming under fire in Iraq, continues to struggle with basic math.  Melissa Harris-Perry:  Show canceled due to low ratings and the host's preference for discussing Beyoncé music videos instead of politics, forced to apologize for making fun of Mitt Romney's adopted black grandchild.  Once described as "America's foremost public intellectual," she once argued that the word "Obamacare" was racist.

As [MSNBC] Reporter Claims 'Protests' 'Entirely Peaceful,' He Gets Proven Wrong Live on Air.  As we have previously reported, MSNBC has been consciously trying to avoid calling the riots over the death of George Floyd "riots."  They've used all kinds of other terms.  As rioters were setting a fire right behind Ali Velshi, he claimed they were "mostly protests," not generally speaking "unruly."

A Judge Rules Rachel Maddow is a Fake News Fabulist and Not a Journalist.  A stark admission to avoid culpability took place.  A court decision came in with a pure document-dump timing this past weekend.  On Friday a judge dismissed a lawsuit brought against MSNBC personality Rachel Maddow by the upstart network One America News, and most in journalism circles probably shrugged with smug satisfaction, if they even noticed during the news vacuum on a holiday weekend.  The $10 million suit was a defamation case, where OAN stated that Maddow had slandered the network on-air when she declared it was an outlet of "paid Russian propaganda".  What has not been properly acknowledged is that in order for her to evade responsibility in the case Maddow took on the defense that she was not delivering fact-based news on her program that evening, something the judge agreed was accurate.

Unmasked: MSNBC's Double-Standard, Elitist, Mask-Shaming Faceplant.  It's a couple of days old, but still absolutely delicious as a demonstration of self-important elite snobbery and hypocrisy.  On Memorial Day, MSNBC sent a crew out to Lake Geneva, Wisconsin, to make sure everyone saw the hicks in the sticks walking around without masks.  "Are they not worried about their personal safety?" the host asks the reporter.  "Nobody's wearing them," the reporter replies — and at that point, a passerby blows the whistle on MSNBC's hypocrisy[.]

MSNBC phony mask-shaming busted on live TV.  If you love seeing progressive, phony propagandists devastatingly embarrassed, this video, less than a minute in length, is a moment to save and savor.  And send to you friends who are cowering in fear of encountering a mask-free human being while outdoors in the sunshine, where coronavirus transmission is almost impossible unless French kissing somebody.  It happened during a live shot in which anchor Katy Tur was expressing shock ("Are the people out there are just not worried, Cal?") that people were out and about on the streets without wearing (useless) face masks.  Cal Perry, the street reporter in a black mask in Lake Geneva, Wisconsin, a popular resort, did his stand-up routine that nobody was wearing a mask.  Then the camera panned to focus on a maskless young man who was walking by (while taking an iPhone video of the TV crew and reporter) as Cal intoned, "Nobody is wearing them."  Big mistake.  The passer-by fired back, "Neither is your cameraman."

MSNBC's Velshi:  Trump Deeming 'Essential' Could Violate 'Church and State'.  This has got to be one of the most dumbfounding [we're tempted to drop the "founding"] statements made by a member of the liberal media regarding the coronavirus.  On his MSNBC show this morning [5/23/2020], Ali Velshi suggested that by deeming houses of worship "essential," thus qualifying them to reopen, President Trump could be in violation of the "separation of church and state." [...] Let's begin by noting that, contrary to Velshi's citation of the "separation of church and state," that phrase is nowhere to be found in the First Amendment.  But liberals love to use it in seeking to drive all religion out of the public square.  Here is the actual wording of the relevant portion of the First Amendment:  "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."  The Founders' intent has been clearly understood as prohibiting the establishment of an official state religion, as in the Church of England.  President Trump's classification of houses of worship as essential did the very opposite of that.  From far establishing one state religion, he said that his order was applicable to all "houses of worship," explicitly including "churches, synagogues, and mosques."

It Never Ends:  Now MSNBC Suggests Vladimir Putin Was Behind DOJ Dropping Case Against Michael Flynn.  The media over the past few years has reported a false narrative that President Donald Trump colluded with Russia during his 2016 campaign to steal the election.  That narrative was proven false after a lengthy special counsel investigation found no evidence of such collusion.  Media outlets and their Democrat supporters refused to acknowledge that they got the story wrong or that they were biased in their reporting.  They are continuing that behavior now that the Department of Justice dropped its charges against former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn. [...] But even though Flynn appears to have been vindicated and the victim of FBI entrapment, MSNBC host Andrea Mitchell had a different take:  That Russian President Vladimir Putin was behind the DOJ's charges being dropped.

If Trump Can Lead U.S. Back To Work, Democrats Will Have Shot Their Bolt.  [Scroll down]  Trish Regan rightly saw that the press and official Democrats were going to attack Mr. Trump from every angle on the issue — for dismissing it at first (as they did themselves) and moving too slowly to expand testing facilities (even as Abbott Laboratories brought out an easy and swift testing device), and by claiming the president was an anti-science moron until he assembled a strong professional task force to manage the crisis.  They criticized his championship of hydroxychloroquine until New York governor Andrew Cuomo revealed on Monday [4/6/2020] that he was dispensing it to tens of thousands of New Yorkers with initial success.  Mika Brzezinski on MSNBC had already declared that we should "follow the money," and implied that the president had a financial interest in that drug, a decades-old malaria remedy.  This was so grossly defamatory, it could pass as criminal slander if the president wanted to press his rights.

MSNBC contributor says Trump's 'crime cult' wants mass murder, 'many more to die'.  Whereas the craziest denizens of the political right tend to inhabit the outermost fringes of the movement, the most demented denizens of the political left tend to be mainstream left-wing media stars.  Take so-called "journalist" and author Sarah Kendzior, whose work has appeared in Al Jazeera, Marie Claire, The Guardian, The New York Times and The Boston Globe — and whose commentary has frequently been featured on MSNBC's "AM Joy."

Without Any Evidence, 'Morning Joe' Suggests Trump May Have Financial Tie to Malaria Drug.  If you've been watching President Donald Trump's daily White House press briefings, you've likely noticed the president is fighting a war on two fronts.  On one hand, he is attempting to guide the country through a battle against a foreign contagion that is not only killing thousands of Americans but also putting millions more out of work.  On the other hand, Trump is fighting a separate war against members of the establishment media, many of whom sit in chairs in the briefing room cloaked as journalists — ready to strike with their baited questions and hateful insinuations.

Abject stupidity:  Mika Brzezinski claims Trump is pushing antimalarial drug as COVID treatment because of 'financial ties'.  When more people tune in to watch old cartoons than watch your morning 'news' show, you have to do and say outrageously stupid things in order to 'get noticed.'  Enter Joe Scarborough and wife Mika Brzezinski of MSNBC.  On Monday [4/6/2020], Brzezinski actually suggested that the reason why President Donald Trump is pushing anti-malarial drug hydroxychloroquine as a possibly effective treatment for coronavirus — you know, the pandemic that has 9/10ths of our country in shutdown mode — because of a "financial tie."  Meanwhile, her parrot husband kept asking on the show why the president would push "an unproven drug" as a potential cure for a disease that has been successfully treated with it, according to a growing number of doctors.

Brzezinski on Trump Pushing Hydroxychloroquine: 'There's Got to Be Some Sort of Financial Tie'.  Monday, MSNBC "Morning Joe" co-host Mike Brzezinski reacted to President Donald Trump's Sunday press conference with the White House coronavirus task force discussing the coronavirus pandemic.  Host Joe Scarborough noted Trump is "pushing an unproven drug" in hydroxychloroquine to help combat the virus.  Brzezinski then speculated Trump continues pushing the drug because "there's got to be some sort of financial tie to someone somewhere."

Armchair Quarterbacks Try to Rewrite History on Coronavirus.  This morning [4/1/2020], MSNBC's Joe Scarborough claimed that, unlike the Trump administration, "Everybody saw this coming in early January."  If Scarborough knew that a deadly, once-in-a-century pandemic was about to descend on the nation in early January — I assume he considers himself part of "everyone" — why on God's earth didn't he warn his susceptible viewers that they should begin social distancing?  Why didn't his producers book a single expert who could beseech his viewers to start wearing masks, to shutter their non-essential businesses, and to avoid church and sporting events?  Why didn't he mention coronavirus at all?  Even in late January, nearly a full month after "everyone knew," Scarborough's show was dominated by the Donald Trump impeachment trial.

The Disgraced Media Are Ramping Up Their Coronavirus History Revision.  One of the big narratives from the left is that the President's handling of the Wuhan Coronavirus Pandemic has been a bungled mess. [...] "We've heard, Zeke Emanuel, that nobody could have seen this coming.  The fact is, everybody saw this coming.  Everybody saw this coming in early January."  That claim is as bold as it is false.  Whereas Scarborough claims that "everybody saw this coming" in early January, the earliest mention we can find Scarborough making of the disease was February 24th when an "expert" came Morning Joe and said Americans should worry about the flu, not the Coronavirus.

Math is hard, even for an MSNBC panic-spreading virology expert.  It was just a few days ago that Brian Williams and Mara Gay mindlessly repeated a meme saying that, instead of spending $500 million on advertising, Bloomberg should just have given all 327 million Americans a million dollars each.  The correct answer is that Bloomberg spent $1.52 per American.  On Monday [3/9/2020], a guest again went stupid about math, this time while trying to explain how many Americans will die from coronavirus.  According to Dr. Joseph Fair, only 80% of the population will survive: [...] Mediaite, from which the above quotation comes, doesn't question Fair's math.  Instead, it takes the numbers at face value and then attacks Trump. [...] Fair made a foolish mistake (presumably he knows better), but both MSNBC and Mediaite ran with the error to undermine Trump's presidency.  These people are both evil and stupid.  Here's the deal with the media:  they don't know what they're talking about, so analyze everything they say before you start to worry.

Chris Hayes goes into full meltdown, says Trump will let Americans die from Coronavirus to win reelection.  Progressive MSNBC commentator Chris Hayes lost his mind Saturday night in an unhinged, multi-tweet rant accusing the administration of "incompetence and malevolence" and of being "sociopathic" in managing the growing coronavirus crisis.  "Trump is attempting to cover up the full scope of the outbreak in order to boost his chances for re-election, Hayes wrote.  "In doing so, he is quite literally threatening public health," he added.  The leftist network host went all wobbly and aflutter following a story released by the AP charging that the Trump administration removed from a CDC plan a recommendation that "elderly and physically fragile Americans be advised not to fly on commercial airlines because of the new coronavirus."  The AP's source for the story was an anonymous federal official.

Why did MSNBC sack Chris Matthews?  Earlier this week, Chris Matthews announced on his MSNBC show "Hardball" that he was quitting.  He then walked off the set.  Later, we learned that the network forced him to resign.  Why?  One explanation is that Matthews made female guests on his show and some female employees "uncomfortable" with sex-charged banter.  But reportedly, Matthews has been doing this forever. [...] Surely, there is more to Matthews's discharge than this.  The "more," I think, is the fact that Matthews offended supporters of Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren.  Barack Obama may have sent a thrill up Matthews's leg, but the two elderly far leftists running this year don't.  Matthews, I gather, is something of a traditional liberal, and thus at odds with MSNBC's core viewership.  Matthews got on the wrong side of Warren's supporters by daring to inquire of her why she believes the allegation that Michael Bloomberg said to a pregnant woman "kill it," meaning the unborn baby.

The real reason Chris Matthews was fired from MSNBC.  Chris Matthews didn't get fired for being a sex monster.  He got fired for doing his job. [...] Matthews laid it on a bit thick at times.  Comparing Bernie Sanders to the Nazis overrunning France?  Ridiculous.  Never compare anyone who hasn't murdered at least a million people to Hitler.  Still, hysterical analogies are exactly what drives viewership of "Hardball" and all the TV and radio shows like it.  We tune in to these guys hoping they'll say something completely bonkers.  Yet to assuage the Bernie Bros, MSNBC (which a couple of weeks ago was forced by market pressures to announce it would be hiring more Bernie-friendly voices) made Matthews issue a groveling apology for the Nazi joke.  This on a network where the comparisons of President Trump to Hitler are so unremarkable that it happened seven times in July alone.

MSNBC anchor Chris Matthews announces he's retiring days after a female journalist accused him of harassment.  MSNBC anchor Chris Matthews announced that his Monday night program would be his last on the network just days after a female columnist accused him of harassing her and amid criticism of his political punditry.  Laura Bassett, a freelance journalist who covers politics, gender, and culture, accused Matthews last Friday of making suggestive comments to her at least twice in 2016 when she was a guest on his show.

MSNBC's Chris Matthews Announces Retirement On Air.  MSNBC host Chris Matthews announced his retirement on air Monday, following a number of negative stories about Matthews in the last month.  "Let me start with my headline tonight, I'm retiring," Matthews said at the open of his show.

Chris Matthews, MSNBC Veteran, Resigns.  Chris Matthews announced his retirement from MSNBC Monday night after more than two decades at the network.  The MSNBC mainstay made the stunning at the start of Monday's night edition of Hardball, a show that has for years been a staple of the network's politics programming.  It also became a headache for MSNBC brass in recent weeks as Matthews came under fire for his often out-of-touch commentary.

The Editor says...
Fake news alert:  The headline says he resigned.  The first sentence of the story says he retired.  There's a huge difference.

Chris Matthews' resignation from MSNBC [was] hastened by [a] series of blunders.  Chris Matthews' abrupt resignation at the beginning of MSNBC's "Hardball" Monday night came after several weeks of blunders that prompted the network to take action, say people familiar with the matter. [...] MSNBC had no comment, but people familiar with the matter say the timetable for a planned retirement was suddenly accelerated after a series of mistakes and missteps by the onetime Jimmy Carter speechwriter and Tip O'Neill aide.  But for Matthews, a passionate political junkie, to bow out the day before Super Tuesday, rather than at the end of the primaries or even the end of the week suggests he did not control the timing.

The Editor goes slightly off-topic:
Regular visitors, if any, may notice that, from time to time, The Editor re-inserts the missing words from news headlines, in order to translate them from Headline-ese to English.  Words were occasionally omitted from headlines in the early 20th century, when newspapers were printed in tightly-constricted columns and space was at a premium.  Today, well into the 21st century, headline writers still feel the need to conserve space and distort the English language.

Chris Matthews' Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Week (And It's About Time).  It's safe to say that MSNBC's Chris Matthews had a bad week this past week.  He got blasted a lot from folks on the left side of the aisle this week and it may ultimately have taken a toll.  He started off the week having to apologize for comparing Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) electoral success in Nevada to France's defeat to Nazi Germany in World War II.  Some even called for his firing for the criticism of Sanders. [...] So by the end of the week, people noticed something that was missing about the South Carolina primary coverage on Saturday night — Chris Matthews, who was noticeably absent.

Left purging Comrade Matthews.  The Left is purging Comrade Chris Matthews at MSNBC for being a counter-revolutionary and having impure thoughts.  His crime was saying Democrats could not stop Breadline Bernie after the Nevada caucuses.  Matthews said on the air, "I'm reading last night about the fall of France in the summer of 1940.  And the general calls up Churchill and says, 'It's over,' and Churchill says, 'How can it be?  You got the greatest army in Europe.  How can it be over?' He said, 'It's over.'"  The network — which has promoted a French Resistance against American President Donald John Trump for more than 3 years — made Matthews beg forgiveness on television for a very remote reference to the Wehrmacht.

Fake News and the 2020 Election.  [I]n August 2019 Lawrence O'Donnell, MSNBC host, announced that Trump was a Russian operative and that Russian oligarchs were signing loans for Trump.  This was an actual statement, not a description of a bad Hollywood Cold War script.  O'Donnell later apologized, explaining that his story came from a source close to the Deutsche Bank who had told him that Trump's loans were co-signed by Russian billionaires close to Putin.  But in what seems more paranoia than genuine analysis, he still persisted in his essential argument, declaring that Putin was working hard to reelect his favorite president of the U.S., and that Putin was Trump's real running mate.

What's Really Behind the Left's 'Cancel Culture'.  After Bernie Sanders won the Nevada Democratic caucuses, liberal icon and MSNBC stalwart Chris Matthews compared Sanders's victory to Nazi Germany's invasion of France.  Immediately after his comments, the leftist mob came after him, demanding that he be fired.  This wasn't some neo-liberal Never-Trumpster who had been masquerading as a Republican for the last two decades. [...] But you make one clumsy historical analogy which implies America's leading Socialist might be as bad for America as the Nazi army was for France and suddenly you're out of favor with your own constituency and you're required to grovel to keep your job.

Chris Matthews facing calls to resign for comparing Sanders Nevada victory to Nazi invasion of France.  MSNBC host Chris Matthews is facing backlash online for equating Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders's win in the 2020 Nevada Democratic caucuses to the Nazi regime's takeover of France.  During a conversation with MSNBC anchor Brian Williams Saturday night, the Hardball host likened the democratic socialist's decisive victory in Nevada to the Nazi's victory over France in World War II.

Chris Matthews Melts Down — Compares Commie Bernie Sanders Winning Nevada to France Falling to the Nazis in 1940.  Apparently Bernie Sanders does not give Chris Matthews a tingling sensation up his leg. [...] Communist Bernie Sanders won big in Nevada with 55% of the vote with 5% reporting[.]  MSNBC's Chris Matthews melted down and compared Communist Bernie Sanders winning the Nevada caucuses on Saturday to France falling to the Nazis in 1940.

TV Networks, Led By CNN And MSNBC, Have Aired Misleading Bloomberg Ad More Than 70 Times.  TV networks, led by CNN and MSNBC, have aired a Michael Bloomberg ad more than 70 times in recent days in which the 2020 Democratic presidential hopeful falsely said he led New York City through 9/11.  "I led a complex, diverse city through 9/11, and I have common sense plans to move America away from chaos to progress," Bloomberg said in a 30-second campaign ad called "It Won't Work."  The problem with the claim is that Bloomberg did not take over as mayor of the Big Apple until Jan. 1, 2002, several months after terrorists flew airplanes into the World Trade Center towers in Manhattan.  Rudolph Giuliani served as mayor when the attacks occurred.

MSNBC's Scarborough Distorts Axios Report on Trump Economy.  Joe Scarborough of MSNBC's Morning Joe distorted an Axios report on President Donald Trump's economy to credit former president Barack Obama.  The show ran a segment defending Obama's tweet congratulating himself for today's booming economy.  Scarborough cited an Axios report on Trump's economy to assert Feb. 18 that "[if] you look at the last ten presidents and their GDP growth throughout their administrations, six in ten of those presidents — according to Axios yesterday, and well just according to government statistics — actually had stronger economies than Donald Trump."  But that's not what Axios' piece was about.  First, the Axios piece never mentioned ten presidents.  The outlet's chart only measured six presidents' average annualized GDP growth by presidential term (Trump included).  Only five of the presidential terms shown in Axios' chart are higher than Trump's first term.  Second, the Axios story was that "Average economic growth under President Trump has outpaced the growth under Barack Obama."

Fox Has Been "More Fair": Why Bernie's Team Has Had It With MSNBC.  Faiz Shakir had seen enough.  As summer turned to fall, and the 2020 Democratic presidential race entered the stretch run before the first caucuses and primaries, Shakir, who manages Bernie Sanders's campaign, approached MSNBC president Phil Griffin to discuss his concerns with the network's treatment of the Vermont senator's second White House bid.  "We watched a ton of terrible coverage occurring and we thought we'd at least try to address it," he recalled.  For months, the campaign bristled at slights from MSNBC's stable of hosts and commentators.  Jason Johnson, an MSNBC contributor, predicted in January 2019 that Sanders would drop out by August, and network analyst Mimi Rocah said in July that Sanders made her "skin crawl."  On-screen graphics have omitted Sanders and misrepresented his poll numbers, a trend that inspired a sendup from the Onion.

Coup Plotters Fear the Quickening.  [Scroll down]  Lawmakers from the very same political party that seeks to decriminalize basically everything — even creating lawless fiefdoms in major cities where noncitizens can break the law with impunity after they illegally enter the country — are apoplectic that a quirky Boomer won't rot in prison for a handful of process crimes.  "This is one of those days in history you will tell your kids and your grandkids what you were doing when this unspooled," Maddow, a Russian collusion truther who has made that claim at least a few hundreds times over the past three years, ranted in her show's opening Tuesday night.  "A rule of law crisis is unfolding in the incumbent administration."  This constitutional emergency, the most serious one since at least last week, was prompted by Donald Trump's public criticism of Stone's original sentence which, according to the Left's newest conspiracy theory, signaled to his attorney general that he'd better act fast.

Brain-Dead MSNBC Anchor Wants 'Gerry-mandering' to Rig the Senate for Democrats After Impeachment.  Did you hear that senators who voted to convict the president represent 12 million more people than senators who voted to acquit?  "In case you missed it, majority doesn't always rule in this country," whined MSNBC anchor Katy Tur.  "Forty-eight senators voted to remove the president from office.  Fifty-two voted to acquit.  But the 48 actually represent 12 million more voters than the senators who decided to keep Donald Trump in the White House."  What's the relevance?  To you, me, and others with gray matter between their ears, none at all.  Tur is actually using a false and dishonest analogy to make an idiotic point.  Fewer than 50 percent of voters in the states represented by senators who voted to convict Trump bothered to vote at all in 2016.  In some of those states, Trump lost by a small margin.  The bottom line is that the number 12 million assumes that every single resident of the state of California would have wanted to convict Trump.  This is as ignorant as saying that every single resident of Texas wanted him acquitted.

Seconds After Speech Ends, Brian Williams Assails 'Dark,' 'Bizarre' State of the Union.  Just seconds after Donald Trump ended his third State of the Union address on Tuesday, — a speech that saw tributes to the heroics of our military and awarding Rush Limbaugh the Presidential Medal of Freedom — MSNBC's Brian Williams, immediately bashed it as "dark," "bizarre" and "unusual."  The honesty-challenged journalist also scolded the "many points [that] differed from the truth."  Williams launched into attack mode, decrying:  "Hard to put how unusual this was from the Speaker of the House ending by pointedly ripping up the text of the speech, to the President here engaging for the second time the Chief Justice who is sitting as judge at his impeachment trial, which continues tomorrow."

America's Opinion Journalists Ranked:  The Good, The Bad, and The Worst.  Chuck Todd (NBC/MSNBC).  You have to hand it to Chuck Todd.  Alone among the crackpots at MSNBC, he appears to have successfully brainwashed himself into actually believing the claptrap he spouts.  So it is that, eighteen months ago, he wrote a piece for the Atlantic titled "It's Time for the Press to Stop Complaining — And to Start Fighting Back."  The thrust of that opus is that the mainstream media always try to be fair and accurate, and to correct errors, but that because of FOX News and the late Roger Ailes, they need to adopt a more aggressive strategy in confronting their critics.

MSNBC analyst:  Iowa caucuses 'essentially the perfect example of systemic racism'.  MSNBC political analyst Zerlina Maxwell referred to the Iowa caucuses as the "perfect example of systemic racism."  Reacting to reports of mediocre turnout, Maxwell also took a shot at President Trump's hard-line immigration policies.  "The Iowa caucus is essentially the perfect example of systemic racism," Maxwell said Monday [2/3/2020] on MSNBC.  "91% of the voters in Iowa are white.  The reason why you see a drop in turnout, I'm just speculating here, it could be perhaps that white children are not in the cages."

MSNBC Declares Russia the Winner of the Soleimani Strike.  Given the many embarrassments the Iranian regime has suffered over the last week it is hard to see the strike that took out Qasem Soleimani as anything but a win for the United States, but that didn't stop MSNBC Live from declaring Russia to be the big winner, because of course it is.  During the segment, host Stephanie Ruhle asked political scientist and Washington Post columnist WSQAQ to comment how certain countries have or have not benefited from the decision to take out Soleimani.  After talking about Britain and Israel, Ruhle asked about Russia.

Satire:
Iran To Replace State-Run Television With MSNBC.  In a bid to cut costs and save time, Iran has announced that its 24/7 state propaganda station will be replaced with an MSNBC broadcast.  The decision to broadcast MSNBC instead of official state propaganda came after an MSNBC reporter parroted the false claims of the Iranian government after yesterday's rocket attacks.  "Why spend so much time creating propaganda to brainwash our people when MSNBC could do it for us?" a representative for Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting said to reporters.

Rachel Maddow's Argument Against OAN Lawsuit:  Don't Believe Her Words Are Fact.  One America News (OAN) is in court against MSNBC's Rachel Maddow in a $10 million lawsuit after Maddow said her conservative competitor "really, literally is paid Russian propaganda."  Now, Maddow is arguing in court that her words should not be taken as fact.  Her actual legal defense, put out in a motion by her lawyer Theodore Boutrous Jr., reads: "...the liberal host was clearly offering up her 'own unique expression' of her views to capture what she saw as the 'ridiculous' nature of the undisputed facts.  Her comment, therefore, is a quintessential statement 'of rhetorical hyperbole, incapable of being proved true or false.'"

Washington Post Media Critic Blasts Rachel Maddow Over Steele Dossier.  On Thursday [12/26/2019], Washington Post Media Critic Erik Wemple slammed far-left MSNBC host Rachel Maddow, claiming that she "seemed to be rooting" for the veracity of the now-infamous Steele Dossier before the document's credibility ultimately "fell apart."  "Name a host on cable news who has dug more deeply into Trump-Russia than MSNBC's Rachel Maddow," Wemple wrote. [...] Wemple systematically walked the reader through a timeline of Maddow's on-air reporting from 2017-2018, during which Maddow repeatedly glommed onto snippets of left-leaning reporting to tendentiously give off the impression to MSNBC viewers that the dossier was something other than the salacious rumormongering that Department of Justice (DOJ) Inspector General has since confirmed it indeed was.

Rachel Maddow's Reckoning.  You may recall that back in March 2017, MSNBC host Rachel Maddow shocked the world by declaring "we've got Trump's tax returns!"  Then she later clarified she had obtained Donald Trump's 1040 form from ... 2005.  Those who tuned in to her program that evening had to watch a meandering 19-minute soliloquy and a commercial break before Maddow showed anything from the tax return, which wasn't much.  Her guest, David Cay Johnson, speculated that Trump may have also leaked nude photos of Melania.  That night was a massive letdown for those who believed Maddow's initial announcement, but it previewed what we could expect from Maddow for the next three years, as the Washington Post's Erik Wemple lays out in exhaustive detail in a review of Maddow's reporting and discussion of the Steele dossier.  His assessment is scathing: [...]

New Year Ahead:  Nothing Will Help Them.  The Washington Free Beacon put together a video of MSNBC's most preposterous reports. [...] It showcased a guest who warned that if the Green New Deal wasn't immediately enacted "people will die."  (Congress didn't, people didn't die, except from unsanitary conditions in places like San Francisco where street pooping is creating a public health menace.)  Chris Hayes whined while defending Katie Hill, whose unconventional sex life forced her resignation, "it really seems like the bad guys won here."  Another featured guest blamed the President for Epstein's death while in federal custody and the phony baloney Jussie Smollett hoax received almost nonstop coverage.

The Elephant in the Spin Room.  As counselor to Vice President Dick Cheney and in management roles in Lamar Alexander's and John McCain's failed presidential campaigns, Republican strategist Schmidt has done more to advance the Left's political fortunes than almost any Democratic strategist.  No one knows better than Steve Schmidt what it takes to defeat Republicans.  And now, fresh from helping Howard Schultz's presidential campaign implode, he's rejoined the MSNBC team to bestow his analytical gift on the remaining Democratic contenders, such as they are.  The panel listened intently as Schmidt, in his authoritative monotone, insisted that former vice president Joe Biden had his strongest debate performance yet, glossing over Biden's age-related word garbling and the monumental gaffe of his forgetting that the woman of color two podia to his left was an African-American senator.  Undeterred, Schmidt maintained that Biden doesn't actually need to win any debates.  He simply has to "survive" the debates.

Joy Reid puts damper on 'American food holiday' Thanksgiving,' mocks your dumb pro-Trump family members.  With the Democratic Party about to come out from behind closed doors in the basement of the U.S. Capitol and take their impeachment inquisition before cameras this week, MSNBC's Joy Reid beat the rush in assisting the party with their objective — shaping public opinion.  And doing so while attacking Thanksgiving.  "We're just over two weeks away from one of the most beloved American food holidays," the AM Joy host said Saturday in her opening remarks.  "Thanksgiving, where problematic actual history meets delicious cuisine and many of you will be heading home to spend time are family and friends, eat a little too much and perhaps engage in a dreaded contentious political debate with your cranky uncle Rosco when he starts yelling, 'Read the transcript!' at the dinner table, between bites of turkey and pumpkin pie. [...]"

'I'm not struggling on anything': Mark Meadows interrupts MSNBC reporter to defend Trump.  Rep. Mark Meadows walked past an MSNBC reporter during a live segment before coming back and chastising the reporter after she said that Republicans were finding it difficult to defend President Trump over impeachment proceedings.  NBC News correspondent Leigh Ann Caldwell attempted to get the North Carolina Republican to do a hallway interview with her, but he blew by with some aides.  "Hold on, we have Mark Meadows right here," Caldwell said as Meadows ignored her.  "So he, he's walking by right now," the reporter continued.  "But Republicans are really struggling to defend the president."  Meadows then cut back into the frame to tell the reporter, "I'm not struggling on anything, so the Republicans are not struggling on anything."

Media Mourn Katie Hill.  Rep. Katie Hill's (D., Calif.) resignation announcement this week had some members of the media in mourning over the Democratic "rising star."  MSNBC's Chris Hayes said it felt like the "bad guys" won, and another analyst called the resignation a "tragedy."  Much of the media coverage focused on Hill's allegation that she was the victim of "revenge porn" distributed by her husband, whom she is divorcing.

The Editor says...
More details about the exceptionally poor judgement and self-inflicted troubles of Representative Katie Hill can be found here, and it's really not the kind of behavior that should be defended by TV reporters.

Citizens of Nowhere.  This piece in Commentary by Bruce Bawer ("The 'Global Citizen' Fraud") deserves wide attention.  Citizenship is out; patriotism is in disgrace; borders are passe.  One Worldism and Global Citizenship are the order of the day.  There are few greater threats to our freedom. [...] Bawer points out that the world is a more diverse place than One Worlders want to admit, and the values and practices of many countries are antithetical to ours.  Bawer's piece is long and deserves to be read in its entirety.

The 'Global Citizen' Fraud.  [T]he Global Citizen Festival was organized by a group called Global Citizen in partnership with firms such as Johnson & Johnson, Proctor & Gamble, and Cisco Technologies.  Rarely have so many heavyweight corporations described their activities in such benign language:  Verizon stated on the event's website that "we focus our business and resources to uplift people and protect the planet."  Who knew?  Covering the festival live, MSNBC hosts kept insisting — between interviews with Democratic politicians and recitation of DNC talking points — that it was "not about politics."  Hurricane Sandy, Central American drought, and the fall of Venezuela, we were informed, were all caused by climate change.  A Mexican official announced her country's new "feminist foreign policy."  The head of some activist group took credit for the decline in U.S. poverty.

MSNBC panel:  Gabbard didn't 'deny being a Russian asset'.  A panel on MSNBC Live mocked Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard for not explicitly denying Hillary Clinton's accusation that she is a Russian asset.  Clinton, 71, said that the Hawaii congresswoman is being groomed by Moscow to run as a third-party spoiler candidate in 2020 to help President Trump win reelection.  Gabbard has since hit back at the 2016 presidential candidate.  "One thing that was interesting about Tulsi Gabbard's response, I mean she went after Hillary Clinton strong, she said she wasn't going to run as a third party candidate, she never denied being a Russian asset," Kimberly Atkins of WBUR said while beginning to laugh on the show Saturday morning [10/19/2019].

'President Isn't Telling the Truth': Nicolle Wallace Cuts Away from Press Conference.  Wow!  The MSNBC host of Deadline:  White House, Nicolle Wallace, declared President Trump to be a liar on Wednesday (how original) and used that as an excuse to cut away from the televised press conference almost 24 hours after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi declared the House's formal attempt to impeach the President.  Perhaps Trump's truth telling about Joe and Hunter Biden was too much for her to tolerate.  In any event, it was a stunning act of anti-journalism.

Watch MSNBC Discuss Trump's Coming Execution.  As I wrote this past weekend, that Trump-Ukraine scandal exploded into a million pieces after about twelve hours of hysteria.  In the end, there was no threat, no quid pro quo, and no real meat to the story.  The issue for many in the media and on the left, though, is that they had invested everything into this.  They truly felt this was finally it and that Trump would be taken down for using foreign aid money to force an investigation of Joe Biden.  That didn't happen and they were again left chasing the wind, suckers of fake news once more.  The problem with being so emotionally invested in all this is that it's hard to let go.  And instead of just admitting their mistake, we end up with lunacy like this from MSNBC: [...]

Far-Left 'MSNBC' Conspiracy Theorist Joy Reid Says 'White Christian Men' Want Apartheid In America.  Joy Reid, a far-left conspiracy theorist and host on 'MSNBC,' said 'White Christian men' want to bring racially segregated apartheid to America in order to keep power.  [Video clip]

CNN: Everything but the News.  Just recently, MSNBC anchor Lawrence O'Donnell broke a story based on a single unnamed source who said that Deutsche Bank documents (which the source had not seen) would soon prove that Russian oligarchs had co-signed a loan application for Donald Trump — O'Donnell was apparently trying to resurrect the Russian-collusion zombie.  The story was discredited within 24 hours by denials from the bank — as O'Donnell did his part to destroy what was left of the credibility of progressive cable news.

One America News Network files $10 million defamation lawsuit against Rachel Maddow, MSNBC, and corporate parents.  President Trump isn't the only one who hits back.  The parent of the scrappy conservative news outlet One America News Network (OANN), Herring Networks, has filed a lawsuit against Rachel Maddow, MSNBC, and its corporate parents for defamation.  The entire statement by the plaintiff's attorneys is embedded below, but this constitutes the heart of the matter, and it goes beyond mere defamation: [...]

One America News Network Files $10 Million Defamation Lawsuit Against MSNBC's Rachel Maddow.  One America News Network (OANN) filed a $10 million defamation lawsuit Monday [9/9/2019] against MSNBC's Rachel Maddow, alleging that the host "maliciously and recklessly" suggested on the air that the conservative news channel is a paid Russian state propaganda outlet.  In addition to Maddow, OANN is suing MSNBC, Comcast Corporation and NBC Universal for defamation.  Maddow based her claims on a Daily Beast report alleging that OANN's Kristian Rouz is a "Russian national on the payroll of the Kremlin's official propaganda outlet, Sputnik."

Conservative Network Files $10M Defamation Lawsuit Against Rachel Maddow, MSNBC.  The owner of right-leaning cable news channel One America News Network (OANN) has filed a defamation lawsuit against Rachel Maddow and others claiming that the 46-year-old liberal commentator "maliciously and recklessly" smeared the network as a Russian state propaganda outlet.  In a press release obtained by Law&Crime, attorneys for OANN's owner Herrring Networks, Inc. said they filed a $10 million defamation lawsuit against Maddow, Comcast Corporation, NBC Universal and MSNBC in a California federal court.  The lawsuit tracks a series of longstanding grievances between OANN and Comcast.

A Shameless Lying MSNBC Hack is the Face of the Media.  [Scroll down]  Rachel Maddow had not bothered to find out anything about [Steven] Menashi before trying to destroy him.  All that mattered were two things.  First, that Menashi was a Trump nominee, making him fair game for any lie, smear and slander.  And second, that Maddow was sinking in the ratings and needed help.  Going after Menashi might not turn things around, but the smear campaign might stop the bleeding.  Rachel Maddow was trying to destroy a good man to keep Bank of America advertising on her show.

MSNBC 'Republican' Urges People To Target NRA Board Members: 'Go After Their Businesses'.  Isn't it funny how even the supposed conservatives on many liberal networks embrace the progressive view on multiple issues?  Over at MSNBC, supposed Republican Susan Del Percio, recently urged people to target board members of the NRA and even target their businesses.

MSNBC and NY Times don't let facts get in way of anti-Trump stories — Fiction is more interesting.  MSNBC host Lawrence O'Donnell, who used to write for the fictional TV show "West Wing," proved this week that he hasn't lost his touch.  He showed that he's not limited to discussing real news — he can make it up and report his fictional version as if it were real.  Like much of what is wrong with the media, it began with a tweet.  And then O'Donnell repeated his fictional claim on MSNBC Tuesday night.  In on-air conversation with Rachel Maddow, whose show immediately precedes his, O'Donnell said he had information about how years ago businessman Donald Trump was "able to obtain loans when no one else would loan him money."

Deep thoughts from MSNBC's Chris Hayes on the Constitution.  Chris Hayes of MSNBC apparently is a big fan of tautology, delivering one of the stupidest lines of recent cable news memory.  His studio audience failed to understand the fatuousness of this claim about the Electoral College:  "If it wasn't [sic] in the Constitution specifically for the presidency, it would be unconstitutional."

Chris Hayes On The Electoral College: 'If It Wasn't Specifically In The Constitution... It Would Be Unconstitutional'.  MSNBC host Chris Hayes attempted to again sow distrust in the Electoral College during his show Friday night [8/30/2019], but his comments have earned mockery on social media.  While speaking to an "All In With Chris Hayes" audience, the host suggested that the Electoral College — America's system for selecting its president since the Constitution was written — is unconstitutional.  "The weirdest thing about the electoral college is the fact that if it wasn't specifically in the Constitution for the presidency, it would be unconstitutional," Hayes said.  The host briefly paused and looked to the audience, as if this was supposed to be an applause line.

Hemingway: Months After Mueller Report, Media Russia Truthers Are Embarrassing And Sad.  After being threatened with legal action from the Trump Organization, MSNBC host Lawrence O'Donnell apologized and retracted his reporting on Wednesday night's show for peddling unverified information about President Trump's tax returns and connections to Russia.  "Tonight, we are retracting the story," he said in his opening monologue.  "I should not have said it on air or posted it on Twitter.  I was wrong to do so."  An MSNBC spokesperson declined to specify what action, if any, the network or NBC News might take as a result of O'Donnell's false reporting.

Fake news:  NBC having a very bad week as correspondents and hosts botch TWO Trump stories.  First, MSNBC host Lawrence O'Donnell was forced to apologize for reporting that an "anonymous source" claimed that Russian oligarchs co-signed loans that Trump, the private businessman, took out with Deutsche Bank after his legal team responded with a threat to sue him and his network.  Next, MSNBC has backed away from claims that "children born to U.S. service members outside of the U.S. will no longer be automatically considered citizens.  Parents will have to apply for citizenship for their children in those situations."  That was tweeted by Ken Dilanian, an NBC News correspondent who covers national security, on Wednesday afternoon [8/28/2019].  Less than an hour later, he issued a correction.

Donald Trump Mocks MSNBC's 'Crazy Lawrence O'Donnell' After Embarrassing Retraction.  President Donald Trump ridiculed MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell after the prime time anchor publicly retracted and apologized for an erroneous report on Wednesday [8/28/2019]. [...] O'Donnell publicly retracted the report on Wednesday during his show after Trump's attorney's threatened a lawsuit.  "I did not go through the rigorous verification and standards process here at MSNBC before repeating what I heard from my source," he said.

MSNBC's O'Donnell:  I Apologize for and Retract Trump Loan Story.  On Wednesday's [8/28/2019] broadcast of MSNBC's "The Last Word," host Lawrence O'Donnell retracted and apologized for a report that President Trump had received loans that were co-signed by Russian oligarchs.

MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell Lets Conspiracy Spread Online After TV Retraction.  Although MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell claims to have retracted his absurd and reckless story about President Trump receiving loans co-signed by Russian oligarchs close to Vladimir Putin, even his claim of a retraction was fake news.  As of this writing [8/29/2019], some 12 hours after he claimed "we are retracting the story," the phony story lives on through social media.

MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell apologizes for unverified Trump-Russia report: 'We are retracting the story'.  MSNBC host Lawrence O'Donnell kicked off his show Wednesday night [8/28/2019] by apologizing for running an unverified report that directly tied President Trump's finances to Russia, which he retracted.

Eric Trump:  Trump Organization taking legal action over MSNBC host Lawrence O'Donnell's 'reckless attempt to slander family'.  Eric Trump vowed that the Trump Organization will take legal action against MSNBC and Lawrence O'Donnell after the left-leaning host aired a singled-sourced, unverified report that President Trump had loans co-signed by Russian oligarchs.  "This was a reckless attempt to slander our family and smear a great company.  Apologies are not enough when the true intent was solely to damage and cause harm.  As a company, we will be taking legal action.  This unethical behavior has to stop. @Lawrence @MSNBC," Eric Trump tweeted Wednesday night [8/28/2019].  The threat of legal action came after the MSNBC host apologized earlier in the evening for what he called an "error in judgment" during his show on Tuesday night.

'Sources Say'.  You could justify reporting almost anything by the nonexistent "journalism ethics" of Lawrence O'Donnell.  On live TV Tuesday night, the MSNBC host told his audience that Donald Trump had obtained loans from Deutsche Bank co-signed by "Russian billionaires with ties to Vladimir Putin."  The basis for this claim, according to O'Donnell, was "a single source close to Deutsche Bank."  O'Donnell then added an interesting caveat:  "If true..."  Yes, of course.  It would be a big scoop, if true.

Lawrence O'Donnell says he made 'an error in judgment' by reporting unverified Trump-Russia bombshell.  MSNBC prime-time anchor Lawrence O'Donnell issued an apology for running with a single-sourced unverified claim about President Trump and Deutsche Bank.  "Last night I made an error in judgment by reporting an item about the president's finances that didn't go through our rigorous verification and standards process," he tweeted on Wednesday.  "I shouldn't have reported it and I was wrong to discuss it on the air.  I will address the issue on my show tonight."

Why NBC, MSNBC's Reporting on The Epoch Times Is Textbook Fake News.  As you know, The Epoch Times is a proudly independent news organization dedicated to truthful reporting.  Thanks to your support, we are now America's fastest-growing newspaper.  It appears, however, that not everyone is thrilled with our growth and our dedication to restoring honest journalism.  On Aug. 20, NBC News and MSNBC dedicated a good amount of their time to The Epoch Times in an attempt to discredit us.  We at The Epoch Times were surprised ourselves at witnessing what appears to be a new low that media are willing to drop to in an effort to quash voices they don't agree with.

MSNBC's Ruhle:  A Recession Would Be 'Normal' and 'OK'.  Monday [8/19/2019] amid rumblings of the United States facing a potential recession, "MSNBC Live" commentator Stephanie Ruhle defended recessions, calling them "a normal part of economic activity."  While the White House is shooting down the notion of an upcoming recession, Ruhle declared it "about time we get a recession."

Unhinged MSNBCers Keep Comparing Trump to Hitler.  MSNBC's anchors from Joe Scarborough to Donny Deutsch are constantly comparing President Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler.  It doesn't matter the topic.  It could be Trump's criticism of "The Squad," or border security, or just because it's a Tuesday.  Regardless, they will find a way to say Donald Trump is LITERALLY Hitler.  From morning (MSNBC's Morning Joe) to afternoon (MSNBC's Deadline:  White House) to evening (MSNBC's Saturday Night Politics) there isn't a time of day where you can't find a MSNBCer who has compared the President to history's worst monster.  The following is just month-long sample of MSNBC hosts comparing Trump to Hitler:  [Video clip]

Nicolle Wallace Apologizes for Saying Trump Is 'Talking About Exterminating Latinos'.  On Tuesday night [8/6/2019], failed McCain/Palin campaign official, former Republican, and MSNBC's Deadline:  White House host Nicolle Wallace apologized for claiming during Monday's show that President Donald Trump has been "talking about exterminating Latinos."

MSNBC host apologizes after guest said 'natural conclusion' of Trump's rhetoric could lead to an 'extermination' of Latinos.  MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace issued an apology Tuesday evening over remarks made during a panel discussion stemming from a guest's suggestion that President Trump has been "talking about exterminating Latinos."  On Monday [8/5/2019], Wallace led a conversation where USA Today opinion columnist Raul Reyes slammed Trump's remarks condemning white supremacy since he had "basically declared open season on Latinos" during his entire presidency.

'We are in a cold civil war': MSNBC commentator says terms like 'illegal immigrant' inspire mass shootings.  MSNBC's Eddie Glaude debated with former Republican North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory over who should bear the blame for inspiring the recent mass shootings in the United States.  Glaude argued Sunday [8/4/2019] on Meet the Press that terms such as "illegal immigrant" are divisive and fuel white nationalists to commit acts of violence.

Fact Check:  MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell Claims 'Squad' Members Are Not Socialists.  MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell claimed on Thursday [7/18/2019] that members of the "Squad" are not socialists, despite the fact that two of them have explicitly identified as such. [...] "Squad" members Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) are both members of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), which explicitly states that "democracy and socialism go hand in hand."  The Democratic Socialists of America Facebook page even congratulated Tlaib on her primary victory last year.

MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell called out for falsely claiming 'not a single' member of the 'squad' is a socialist.  Fact-challenged Andrea Mitchell is under fire for missing the obvious about Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and the other progressive congresswomen of "The Squad."  The MSNBC anchor struggled to accept Republicans, including President Trump during his campaign rally this week, calling the women "socialists," denying it was so during a panel discussion on "Andrea Mitchell Reports" Thursday [7/18/2019].

Kasie Hunt Spreads Fake News Biden's Segregationist Pals Were 'Republicans'.  MSNBC's Kasie Hunt misidentified Joe Biden's Democrat segregationist pals on Wednesday [6/19/2019] as Republicans.  While teasing a segment about the uproar over the former vice president bragging about being able to do business with racist segregationists, Hunt, a far-left activist and MSNBC hostess, spread this fake news: [...]

Impeachment Fever:  Democrats whip themselves into a frenzy.  [Scroll down]  Meanwhile, over at the Democrats' top propaganda arm, MSNBC, we have guests complaining that it's impossible to get onto the network unless they promise to talk about impeachment.  No other topic is to be broached.  And for those who do, "no TV for you."  CNN is beating the drum hard for impeachment, too, giving lots of airtime to professors and more professors calling for it.

Continuing plunge of CNN, MSNBC ratings reveals that fake news is a bad business strategy.  The catastrophic ratings decline for both CNN and MSNBC was no temporary blip following publication of the Mueller report.  Both cable news outlets had heavily promoted the hoax of Russian collusion with the Trump administration, teasing the hopes of Trump-haters for impeachment and prosecution for treason.  Now, those disappointed viewers have gone away, and continue to stay away.

MSNBC Suggests No One Is Trying To Take Our Guns.  Here's Their Correction.  In true leftist fashion, the Democrats have been utilizing the New Zealand shooting as a way to push the issue of gun control in the United States.  MSNBC's Ali Velshi is one such individual, who took a moment to push the issue on his show, kicking off the festivities by claiming that "nobody in America has suggested banning any guns."  Only that's incredibly false.  Democrats have been trying to take our guns away for some time, both on the voter, activist, and lawmaker level.  A perfect example is a fervor to strip America of its gun rights after the Parkland shooting, as marchers held out signs that promoted the removal of our right to bear arms by banning guns.

How Joe and Mika have been tricking 'Morning Joe' audience.  Married MSNBC co-anchors Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski are reportedly making it look like they're broadcasting their show "Morning Joe" from different locations, when they're actually traveling together.  Fans have noticed that the duo have not been broadcasting their show from New York lately — and they appear to be co-hosting from two Washington, DC, locations, judging from different Beltway backdrops behind each anchor.  But Washington Post reporter Paul Farhi said on Twitter of Scarborough and Brzezinski:  "They're broadcasting from a home studio in Jupiter [Florida].  And there's no formal set in their home studio, just a couple of (Washington) backdrops.  Thus, a wide shot is out of the question."

MSNBC's Nicolle Wallace: 'There isn't a strain of racism on the left'.  MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace claimed on Tuesday that only one side of the aisle has problems dealing with racism. [...] Wallace, who previously served under President George W. Bush and was a senior advisor on Sen. John McCain's 2008 presidential campaign, weighed in on [Rep. Steve] King's controversial comments by taking aim at the entire party.  "Part of the problem is we think — this does not have a parallel on the left.  It doesn't.  There isn't.  There isn't a strain of racism on the left.  So I think that this gets brushed under the rug.  People sort of tolerate — it's been normalized," Wallace told the panel.  "Like you just said, they don't have anywhere else to go, so they attach to the Republican Party.  The Republican Party doesn't have to let them.  How — how do — how do Republicans sort of get back to doing something decent?"  "They would have to completely reinvent the party," former Obama official Matthew Miller responded.

MSNBC Host: 'There Isn't a Strain of Racism on the Left'.  MSNBC anchor Nicolle Wallace said there is no strain of racism on the left the same day the Democratic National Committee had to pull out of the Women's March because of an anti-Semitism scandal.  Wallace's program "Deadline:  White House" devoted a segment to Rep. Steve King's remark about wishing "white supremacy" was not considered offensive.  Republicans voted unanimously to condemn white supremacy today but Wallace was laser-focused on trashing every member of her former party for the comment.  "This does not have a parallel on the left.  There just — it doesn't.  There isn't.  There isn't a strain of racism on the left.  I don't — so I think that this gets brushed under the rug.  People sort of tolerate — it's been normalized," Wallace said.  "How do Republicans sort of get back to doing something decent?"

The Editor says...
Examples of black racism can be found here.  The "soft bigotry of low expectations" and other aspects of the shabby treatment of minorities by those on the left can be found here

What did Mr. King say that was racist?
MSNBC's Nicolle Wallace: 'There isn't a strain of racism on the left'.  Last week, Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, landed himself in hot water for racist remarks he made during an interview with the New York Times.  "White nationalist, white supremacist, Western civilization — how did that language become offensive?  Why did I sit in classes teaching me about the merits of our history and our civilization?" King asked.

Liberal media tell us the left is right, and the right is wrong.  "Morning Joe" brought MSNBC host Al Sharpton on to blast Trump for anti-Semitism.  There's only one problem with that.  Back when Scarborough was an actual Republican and serving in Congress, he proposed a resolution:  "Condemning the racist and anti-Semitic views of the Reverend Al Sharpton."  The major media would have been all over it if a conservative had so openly backtracked.  But it got almost no attention because Scarborough works for MSNBC.  The press is OK with how much he has to contort himself to fit in the network's world view.  They are also OK that MSNBC employs Sharpton as a host.  Media cover-ups directly benefit politicians with the letter "D" after their name.

MSNBC Host Incorrectly Claims Broward County Election Supervisor Is a Republican.  MSNBC host Andrea Mitchell on Monday [11/12/2018] claimed Florida's Broward County election supervisor Brenda Snipes is a Republican, despite the fact she is a Democrat.  "We should also point out that Brenda Snipes in Broward County is a Republican appointed by former governor, then-Governor Jeb Bush," Mitchell said in a clip flagged by Mediaite.  "So, she was put in by a Republican governor after the mess that we all remember from 2000.  And she's hardly a Democratic official, or someone doing the bidding of the Democratic candidates there."  Snipes self-identifies as a Democrat and has run as a Democrat for her current position.

MSNBC Freaks:  Kavanaugh Confirmation Means Racism, 'Back to the '50s'.  Just seconds after Brett Kavanaugh was confirmed to the United States Supreme Court, MSNBC hosts suffered a meltdown, raging against a country founded on "the idea that being a free white" man gives you all the power.  Host Joy Reid suggested that feeling returned on Saturday as Mitch McConnell imposed a form of tyranny.  Reid slimed, "Mitch McConnell has decided that order means that people like Mitch McConnell, men like him rule.  He believes in rule.  Democrats tend to believe in governing.  Republicans believe in rule."

MSNBC Keeps Lying About the Dossier Being Corroborated.  An MSNBC panelist named Paul Butler, a Georgetown Professor, stated on the Joy Reid show that the Steele dossier "keeps getting corroborated" by Special Counsel Robert Mueller and reporters.  That is not at all true.  Nothing of significance has been confirmed.  Even Jim Comey said the FBI could not verify the document.  Earlier this week, Lanny Davis, the Clinton mob lawyer now representing Cohen, asserted that the dossier's allegations about Cohen are "100 percent" false.

NY Times Columnist:  Trump 'Would Certainly Like to' Murder People Without Due ProcessNew York Times columnist Michelle Goldberg argued with her fellow panelists on MSNBC's "Meet the Press Daily" Friday [8/17/2018] about whether President Donald Trump is the leader of the free world or an aspiring despot.  RealClearPolitics reporter Caitlin Huey-Burns was criticizing Trump's communication strategy when she called him "the leader of the free world."  Goldberg interjected to say that, actually, German Chancellor Angela Merkel is the leader of the free world.  "He's not the leader of the free world, but, sorry," Goldberg said.  "By default he's the leader of the free world," Commentary magazine editor John Podhoretz replied.  "Angela Merkel is the leader of the free world," Goldberg said, while Podhoretz laughed.

Heilemann: 'Virtually Certain' 10 Percent of the GOP Would Be OK with Trump Killing Their Parents, Grandparents.  Thursday [8/16/2018] on MSNBC's "Morning Joe," NBC analyst John Heilemann posed the scenario of a pollster asking members of the GOP that think it would be OK for President Donald Trump to kill their parents or grandparents, saying he is "virtually certain" 10 percent would be fine with the president killing

Katy Tur Makes False Statement About GOP Then Admits She's Clueless.  MSNBC's Katy Tur falsely claimed on Monday [7/30/2018] that the Republican Party was opposed to arming Ukraine in their opposition of Russia and later admitted she didn't know what she was talking about after she was corrected on air.

MSNBC lies in support of Hillary's candidacy documented and savaged — from the left.  NBC, a subsidiary of Comcast, and its cable news affiliate MSNBC have become among the fiercest antagonists of President Trump.  Even before his election, they were shameless in shilling for Hillary Clinton's candidacy.  Conservatives know this quite well, but now comes documentation from the left of the outright lies, not just permitted, but encouraged and rewarded by the cable outlet, and tolerated by its corporate parents.  Glenn Greenwald, of the Intercept, documents an attempt to smear left-wing presidential candidate Jill Stein.  The presumption has to be that votes for Stein would otherwise have gone to Hillary, so hobbling her with lies would also hurt the prospects of electoral success of Donald Trump.

Watch: MSNBC Analysts Claim Trump Admin Is Operating Concentration Camps.  Two MSNBC analysts falsely claimed on Friday [6/15/2018] that the Trump administration is operating concentration camps for illegal immigrant children who are separated from their parents.  Guests Stephanie Cutter and Michael Steele made the remarks, which went completely unchallenged by host Stephanie Ruhle.  Cutter, who was a high-level official in Barack Obama's 2012 presidential campaign, claimed that what the Trump administration is doing was not the law, just merely their "interpretation" of the law.

'Morning Joe' contemplates Trump's mental 'stability' after dry-mouth speech.  The panel on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" suggested Thursday [12/7/2017] that President Trump is suffering from diminished mental capacity after he delivered a speech and slurred some of his words toward the end.  Republican strategist and MSNBC contributor Steve Schmidt, a regular on the show, said Trump appeared to have an "impairment" and called it "chilling" to watch.  "This is not the person that we knew even three years ago. ... There's a remarkable change," said host Joe Scarborough.  "He seemed like he was almost hanging on to the prompter and hanging on to the words," co-host Mika Brzezinski said.  "Something, I don't know. ... There was a struggle happening."

MSNBC Spins Pro-Abortion Alabama Democrat as 'Conservative'.  MSNBC journalists on Tuesday rushed to the defense of the Democrat in Alabama's Senate race, spinning Doug Jones as "moderate" and "conservative."  This despite his firm support for abortion and some gun control policies.

Fake live news:
'Morning Joe' caught airing pretaped show the day after Thanksgiving.  The "Morning Joe" hosts were talking turkey the day after Thanksgiving, but all the viewers heard was bull.  "Day after Thanksgiving.  Woo!  I'm stuffed!" host Mika Brzezinski said to open the show.  "A great Thanksgiving," Joe Scarborough replied before they both offered a few awkward chuckles.  The live MSNBC show — which airs five days a week — seemed normal at first, but a few fans were quick to notice it wasn't unfolding in real-time.

The Editor says...
Recorded TV shows that are marketed as "live" are plentiful, and they are nothing new.  For example, the Wendy Williams show, Live with Kelly (delayed in some markets), Access Hollywood Live, TMZ Live.  About half of your local TV news programs are pre-produced.  Even a purported "live" report from the field is usually just an introduction to a pre-produced news package or interview.  That's not necessarily a bad thing.  If the local news show was all live, it would be dreadfully boring and repetitive, and the local TV station would go broke because of the labor costs.

MSNBC's Brian Williams Encourages Viewers to Share Storm Photos, 'Pretend' They're Their Own.  MSNBC's The 11th Hour host Brian Williams is probably regretting a flippant comment he made during the network's live coverage of Hurricane Irma on Sunday afternoon [9/10/2017], after it earned him mockery online.  While discussing a photo reporters in Tampa, Florida had taken of the intense winds, Williams instructed Florida viewers to not take similar photos of their own.  Instead, he suggested they steal this photo, share it, and "pretend you shot it."  "We'll look the other way," he helpfully added.

MSNBC Contributor:  Hillary Lost Because Obama Is Black.  MSNBC contributor Wendy Sherman believes that Hillary Clinton may have lost the election because it was too hard for America to elect the first female president directly after the first black president.  Sherman was on a panel at the Aspen Ideas Festival discussing modern political technology when she segued into the bizarre comment.

MSNBC Anchor:  Planned Parenthood 'A Critical Tool For Helping Saving Lives'.  MSNBC anchor Ali Velshi spent several minutes Tuesday heralding Planned Parenthood as "a critical tool for helping saving lives" and said "I'm not an advocate" before having Planned Parenthood's Director of Constituency Communications come on to defend the organization.

Guilt By Association:  Mitchell Sneers That Montana Assault Is 'Extension' of Trump.  Guilt by association.  That's what Andrea Mitchell believes.  Despite the fact that Donald Trump is on another continent, the Andrea Mitchell Reports anchor thinks that the assault against a journalist by a Montana congressional candidate is an "extension" of the President.  Talking about Greg Gianforte's attack on Guardian reporter Ben Jacobs, the MSNBC host connected, "There is so much hostility, frankly, to the press, a lot of it generated by the Donald Trump rallies."

NPR, Uncorked on MSNBC: 'Right Wing Media' 'Brainwashed' People to Believe Lies.  The liberal media threw a proverbial hissy fit Monday [11/28/2016] in response to President-Elect Donald Trump's dubious claim that millions of votes were cast illegally.  While seeming pretend that Trump would be the first president ever to tell a lie, public radio host Bob Garfield went on a long winded tirade, on MSNBC's All In, railing against the "Right wing media."  "The people who get it and we at the mainstream media, you know, get the straight dope but about half the electorate is getting their information from other sources, none credible," he whined.  The ranting Garfield blamed the success of "right wing media" on what he called "330 million individual echo chambers," which he claimed helped to insulate people from news they don't want to hear.  He didn't seem to realize that his belief works both ways, especially when it's evident that left does not want to consider another perspective on nearly everything.

NBC News' Pete Williams Reports FBI 'Really Isn't' Conducting Clinton Foundation Investigation.  Appearing on MSNBC's MTP Daily today, NBC News' justice correspondent Pete Williams refuted much of the reporting from Wall Street Journal and Fox News regarding a likely indictment regarding an FBI investigation into the Clinton Foundation.  Fox's Bret Baier later backed off slightly, saying the indictment comment was "inartfully answered."  Speaking to host Chuck Todd, Williams claimed that via his own law enforcement sources, there doesn't actually appear to be much of an investigation, let alone one that will result in indictments.

Andrea Mitchell Falsely Claims Donna Brazile Leak Story Has Been 'Completely Knocked Down' [Video].  In the face of all evidence to the contrary, MSNBC host Andrea Mitchell claimed on Thursday [10/20/2016] that allegations that Democratic National Committee chair Donna Brazile leaked town hall questions to the Clinton campaign have been "completely knocked down."  Mitchell was discussing references Donald Trump made on Thursday to leaked debate and town hall questions.  Trump claimed on Twitter that questions from Wednesday's debate, moderated by Fox News' Christopher Wallace, were provided to the Clinton campaign.  On Thursday, he referred to the scandal involving Brazile and her apparent leaking of a CNN/TV One town hall question asked of Clinton in March.

MSNBC host insists Clinton created jobs.  An MSNBC news anchor insisted on Friday that Hillary Clinton has a record of job creation that's at least more than "zero," but then struggled to point to any evidence of her claim.  The anchor, Stephanie Ruhle, interviewed Arkansas Attorney General Leslie Rutledge, a Donald Trump supporter, who said Trump created "thousands and thousands" of jobs as a businessman.  "How many jobs has Hillary Clinton created?" asked Rutledge.  "Zero is the answer.  Zero jobs for any woman.  Zero jobs for any man, for that matter.  So, she has zero credibility when it comes to job creation."

MSNBC Anchor Falsely Claims Trump Has Never Been on Stage With a Female Candidate.  MSNBC anchor Kate Snow falsely claimed in an interview Monday that Donald Trump has never appeared on a debate stage with a woman. [...] Snow appeared have forgotten about Carly Fiorina's presence on the Republican debate stage during the primary process.  Fiorina participated in four debates with Donald Trump and the rest of the GOP field.

Seriously? New Chris Matthews Ad Touts Liberal's 'Tough Questions'.  In case you weren't aware, the liberal Chris Matthews is the king of the "tough questions."  That's according to a new ad airing on MSNBC.  In the spot, Matthews brags, "I take it as my job not to just ask the tough questions... but to get answers to them." [...] However, in January of 2016, the Hardball host conducted a 20 minute softball interview with Hillary Clinton.  It included "questions" such as this one:  "Well, New York came and fell in love with you and said, 'We like you, come up here, live up here and be our senator.'"

Brian Williams:  U.S. Is 'The Only Nation to Have Used' Nuclear Weapons 'In Anger'.  MSNBC breaking news host and ex-NBC Nightly News anchor Brian Williams was allowed out on MSNBC's airwaves early Friday afternoon [5/27/2016] to discuss President Obama's visit to Hiroshima so he could resurrect a taped report that aired in 2005 on the 60th anniversary of the nuclear bomb's dropping on the Japanese city.  In the course of discussing the event afterward, though, Williams threw some shade in the direction of the U.S. military and then-President Harry Truman by complaining that "we're the only nation to have used them in anger" against the horrifying Axis Powers member.

Apparently, no one at MSNBC pays taxes.  Democrats are fond of accusing Republicans of being hypocrites on a variety of issues, but particularly when it comes to tax policy.  The liberal comedian Bill Maher recently claimed that Republicans expose themselves to this critique when they champion the value of hard work and perseverance while simultaneously opposing the inheritance tax.

Liberal Hypocrites At MSNBC Don't Pay Their Taxes.  For typical Americans who paid all their taxes upfront, Friday [4/24/2015] is Tax Freedom Day.  But for several hosts at MSNBC, Tax Freedom Day came much sooner.

MSNBC's Touré Has the Taxman on His Case.  Touré Neblett, co-host of MSNBC's The Cycle, owes more than $59,000 in taxes, according to public records reviewed by National Review.  In September 2013, New York issued a state tax warrant to Neblett and his wife, Rita Nakouzi, for $46,862.68.  Six months later, the state issued an additional warrant to the couple for $12,849.87.

Four MSNBC Stars Do Not Pay Their Taxes.  National Review's Jillian Kay Melchior reported Wednesday [4/22/2015] that, along with Al Sharpton and Melissa Harris-Perry, two more MSNBC stars are not paying their fair share of taxes.  Touré Neblett, co-host of "The Cycle" owes the IRS a cool $59,000.  Joy-Ann Reid, a former anchor and now a regular contributor to the "Lien" Forward network, owes New York almost $5,000 in back taxes.  As we reported last week, Melissa Harris-Perry owes the IRS $70,000.  Al Sharpton's tax bill is upwards of $3-$4 million.

MSNBC fails to address tax problems of hosts.  National Review reported today that MSNBC's Touré, who co-hosts the network's afternoon program "The Cycle," owes nearly $60,000 in taxes to New York State, according to a pair of tax warrants that the magazine found.  And as the story fully noted, there's a trend afoot here: [...]

MSNBC's Tax Delinquents Lecture Audience on Taxes.  MSNBC, the liberal network that advocates at every turn for a progressive revenue system, is home to four tax delinquents who have all lectured their audience about tax fairness over the years.

Chris Matthews Says 'Unemployment Was Well Past 10%' When Obama Took Office — It Was Only 7.8%.  "When your guy left town, Dubya — who nobody asked him to come back by the way at the Republican convention — unemployment was well past ten percent and skyrocketing."  So falsely said MSNBC's Chris Matthews to conservative talk radio host Roger Hedgecock on HBO's Real Time Friday [9/21/2012].


NBC

NBC Reporter:  It's 'Obviously a Possibility' Shooter Might Have Targeted Trump for Not Being 'Conservative Enough'.  NBC News correspondent Tom Winter theorized the man police say tried to kill former President Donald Trump in Pennsylvania on Saturday might have targeted him for not being "conservative enough."  Winter joined MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell on Sunday's edition of Alex Witt Reports during the network's ongoing coverage of the assassination attempt against Trump that left a Trump supporter dead, the former president with a graze wound to the ear, and two others wounded.

Ronna McDaniel and the Peacock Network.  Is there any rational person who still believes that the National Broadcasting Company is in any way a reliable source of news?  The network of Chet Huntley, David Brinkley, Harry Reasoner, Roger Mudd, and Tom Brokaw has now abandoned all pretense of impartiality.  This is thanks to their atrocious treatment of former RNC chair Ronna McDaniel.  It has been quite obvious that all of the original networks tilt to the Left and have done so quietly for many years if not decades.  But NBC is unique in that it also produces MSNBC, an unabashedly leftist news/commentary product.  Its commentators often move back and forth between the main network and the upstart.  The hiring of Ms. McDaniel by NBC proper was probably considered a good move to maintain a thin veneer of bipartisanship.

Welker Lets Adam Schiff Answer at Length, But Lindsey Graham Gets the But!  But!  But!.  It's clear that NBC Meet the Press host Kristen Welker has two modes of operation:  Democrats get polite questioning, often about internal party matters, while Republicans get hammered with rough questions and predictably interrupted with bickering.  There was a dramatic contrast on Sunday between Welker's polite approach to Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and her incessant bickering with Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.).  I'll throw some math in.  Schiff received six questions in his interview, and he spoke for 827 words.  That's about 138 words per answer.  He had no reason to fear Welker jumping in.  Here's the agenda of questions, which is like two Democrats chatting: [...]

NBC dishonestly conflates the political career of Joe Biden with the presidency itself.
'Presidency In Peril': NBC's Meet The Press Panics Over New Poll.  I'm old enough to remember when the late, great Rush Limbaugh referred to NBC's Sunday political affairs show as Meet the Depressed.  A return to that moniker might be in order after today's opening segment on the latest NBC News poll, showing former President Donald Trump opening a five-point lead over incumbent President Joe Biden and triggering a panic over Biden's "presidency in peril".

Media hatred and censorship of Christians.  Sensational rookie quarterback C.J. Stroud appeared for an interview over the weekend immediately after leading his Houston Texans to a playoff win.  The exhausted, battered, victorious 22-year-old opened with these words:  "First and foremost, I just want to give all glory to my Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ."  The game was carried by NBC.  They posted Stroud's postgame interview but, predictably, edited out his opening statement — the very statement that the player himself said was "first and foremost" to him and his terrific game.  Stroud is Black.  It used to be that liberals tolerated Black displays of religion because they thought such displays were cute, as in Black churches with people dancing in the aisle and shouting "Hallelujah!"  Never mind that such displays were profound and spiritual for the Black participants; liberals condescendingly tolerated them only because they saw them as something like a kindergarten Christmas play.  But as liberals drifted toward outright leftism and now censorious wokism, they stopped tolerating Christian displays even if the displays are by kindergarteners or Blacks.  The wokesters running the media have decided Christianity is evil and Christian verses and beliefs are hate speech.

NBC News Covers for Bill Clinton.  The mainstream media is now openly defending the alleged child sex abusers.  The anchor on NBC News defended Bill Clinton on Wednesday night after legal documents were released that show he likes young girls on Epstein Island.

Our Dysfunctional Press.  Meet the Press, one of TV's most iconic news programs, transitioned to a new host on September 17th.  That morning saw Kristen Welker anchor her first show after succeeding long-time host, Chuck Todd.  It would be easy to take the position that it would be Tweedle-dee, Tweedle-dum.  But in the spirit of writing this column and being part of the journalist world, I committed to giving her a shot.  She was able to book former President Donald Trump for her first show, no question a big "get."  Trump is difficult to watch as a guest because of his repetitive rhetoric and chest pounding, so watching was indeed a commitment.  He was a prince compared to her.  It wasn't just that she dripped with disdain for Trump.  That would be expected since she is aligned with the left-wing press.  The questioning was truly atrocious and lacked any professional standards. [...] At 22 minutes into the show, I had enough.  Why do I need to listen to someone who is not practicing journalism?  She is a political advocate.

NBC News frames Senate sex tape video as 'conservative news outlets' pushing the story.  NBC News came under fire on social media over a "ridiculous" headline that seemed to fault "conservative news outlets" for reporting that a Democrat Senate staffer filmed a gay sex video in a Capitol Hill hearing room.  The report came after the Daily Caller published an amateur pornographic video Friday that showed an alleged congressional staffer engaging in sex with another man in Hart Senate Office Building room 216.  According to the Daily Caller, the video was leaked after being "shared in a private group for gay men in politics."  Posts on social media claimed the alleged staffer worked for Sen. Ben Cardin, D-Md.  Hours after the story broke, Cardin's office announced that a legislative aide had been dismissed but did not explicitly link the staffer or his dismissal to the sex tape.

NBC Argues We Celebrate Economy 'Going in the Right Direction'.  NBC's Today had an update Wednesday on inflation following Tuesday's release of last month's inflation numbers with prices rising 3.2 percent, but NBC liberals wanted us to "bask in the good news for a minute" with prices falling in all sorts of sectors before conceding "grocery prices are too high" and the public "doesn't feel" the way they're supposed to (as in positively) about the country's economic outlook.  "With the holiday season upon us, a lot of Americans are thinking about their money.  How far will their money go?  Well, the latest report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics showing that, overall, prices have not changed much the last few months, but they're still up more than three percent from last year," co-host Craig Melvin began before boasting "consumer prices are increasing at a slower rate than we've been seeing."

Here's a top candidate for 'most misleading MSM headline of the year'.  Paul Kessler, a Jewish man in California, passed away after a pro-Palestine protester struck him in the head with a megaphone.  His death has been ruled a homicide.  The Ventura County Sheriff's Office is investigating and hasn't ruled out deeming the assault a hate crime.  (I should hope not.  It obviously was.)  In the latest example that the mainstream media are the enemy of the people (and truth, sanity, and decency), NBC News ran the following online headline about the attack:  "Man dies after hitting head during Israel and Palestinian rallies in California, officials say."  Officials said that, you say?  Hmm, did the poor fellow perhaps slip and fall, hitting his head on the sidewalk?  Did he smack himself in the head too hard?  That headline makes it difficult to discern what happened.  Oh, he was murdered?!  That's horrible!  Why didn't you say so?!

NBC Quietly Changes "Man Dies After Hitting Head" Headline on Death of Elderly Jewish Man by Pro-Palestine Protestor.  On Monday, an elderly Jewish man, 65-year-old Paul Kessler, succumbed to injuries sustained at a pro-Palestinian protest over the weekend after he was hit in the head by a pro-Palestinian protester.  Despite the extensive media reports about the deadly incident, NBC News' headline is classic Mainstream Media gaslighting.  The original headline read, "Man dies after hitting head during Israel and Palestinian rallies in California, officials say."  Keller did not just "hit his head." He was attacked by a pro-Palestine protestor and assaulted with a megaphone.  The vicious blow caused Keller to fall to the ground where suffered an additional blow to the head, compounding his injuries.

Look at how NBC framed this story, then let me tell you the details.  This NBC story is getting traction, and NBC knew it would get traction, because they want to milk the "cops are bad, America is racist" hustle for all it's worth.  [Tweet] [...] This is why I hate the corporate media.  They are lying to you with glossy, embellished stories.  This was indeed a tragedy.  There was no mention of Dexter's father in this entire piece (though I'm not supposed to notice that).  Dexter was a violent man who showed baseline common decency at times and suffered the mental effects of a fatherless, criminal, addicted life.  He needed better men to guide him.  But as a nearly-40-year-old man, he wasn't a boy.  He stole cars and used forcefully robbed people.  This was his own fault and not the fault of "oppression" or "trauma."

NBC's Moderator Told Trump 'No One' Is Calling For Late-Term Abortions.  Here's Why She's Wrong.  NBC's Kristen Welker claimed "no one" is arguing for legal abortion up to birth in her new interview with former President Donald Trump, but that claim is demonstrably false.  The new "Meet the Press" moderator sparred with Trump for over an hour on abortion and other issues in an interview released Sunday.  "The radical people on this are really the Democrats that say after five months, six months, seven months, eight months, nine months, and even after birth, you're allowed to terminate the baby," Trump told Welker during the interview.  "Mr. President, Democrats aren't saying that," Welker responded.  Moments later Trump said, "I said with Hillary Clinton when we had the debate, I made a statement, 'rip the baby out of the womb' in the ninth month.  You're allowed to do that, and you shouldn't be allowed to do that."  "Again, no one is arguing for that.  That's not a part of anyone's platform, Mr. President," Welker said.  Besides the untold number of abortion activists who advocate for abortion on demand up to birth, a slew of states currently allow abortion at any point in the pregnancy.  Alaska, Colorado, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington, D.C. all allow abortion with no gestational limits.

Chuck Todd signs off final show as host of 'Meet the Press'.  Far-left MSNBC host Chuck Todd celebrated his last day as the host of "Meet the Press" this Sunday morning by touting his so-called "journalism." [...] To be clear, what Todd does is not journalism — it's left-wing advocacy and commentary. [...] He's an advocate for the Democrat Party who spouts Democrat Party talking points to a T and almost always dismisses Republican Party talking points as misinformation, disinformation, etc.  For example, in January he defended current President Joe Biden's scandalous youngest son, Hunter, saying that "it is not a crime to make money off of your last name."  But it certainly is a crime when that last name is linked to the presidency.  Months later in May, he claimed gender isn't binary as is instead on a spectrum — which, incidentally, is exactly the nonsense that Democrats believe.  Then in July, he touted a dubious study that claimed more Republicans than Democrats died during the COVID pandemic — and he did so without pushing back on the study's suspicious methodology.  And then after the recent racially motivated mass shooting in Jacksonville the following month, he echoed Democrat Party talking points about how racially motivated crimes are mainly a Republican phenomenon.

Notice what is missing from this article seeking to scare us?  This article from NBC News clearly is intended to scare us:  ["]Ready for another 'tripledemic'?  CDC prepares for a winter of '3 bugs out there'["]  But numbers and facts, are missing.  They don't tell us how many people are testing positive or how many hospitalizations there are. [...] Nationwide it is less than 20,000.  Why don't they put the numbers in the article?  Probably because 20,000 weekly visits in a population of 330 million wouldn't scare anyone.  It also doesn't say if the people were sick with other stuff or if they were admitted.  It appears that the reason for the article is to get us to take booster shots!

Preparing America for the unthinkable.  Recently, I was watching Meet the Press with Chuck Todd. [...] As a teaser just before the Data Download on this particular show, Chuck Todd said, "It is not uncommon for former leaders to be jailed or prosecuted after leaving office."  He went on to use banana republics like Guatemala and Panama as his first examples. [...] Although no American President has ever been jailed after leaving office, Chuck Todd's point was clear:  It's not so bad that former President Trump, who has been charged with 37 felonies by Joe Biden, will go to jail for possibly 400 years.  It happens all the time.  No big deal.  Get over it America.

NBC just repeats climate predictions by the UN, no matter how many previous dire projections have been 100% wrong.  It seems that every day the media will repeat a doomsday prediction about the climate from the UN or elsewhere to scare the public.  They never ask questions even though previous dire predictions have been 100% wrong.  The purpose is clearly to mislead the public that predictions are equivalent to facts, and they must capitulate to radical leftist policies to save the planet.  The prediction below is that people in the southern U.S won't be able to survive unless they give up gas cars, gas furnaces, and other conveniences. [...] What will make the South more uninhabitable is if they succed in destroying the power grid and we have less air conditioning.

Fauci Family Values.  Dr. Anthony Fauci, formerly Joe Biden's top medical advisor, has accepted a position as a distinguished professor at Georgetown University Medical School.  As NBC news explains, Dr. Fauci has "several personal connections" to the campus.  Dr. Fauci's wife Christine Grady earned her undergraduate and PhD degrees at Georgetown.  Fauci and Grady were married in Georgetown's Dahlgren Chapel, and their three daughters were born at Georgetown Hospital.  The NBC report fails to note that Grady is the head of bioethics at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and that her personal connections with Dr. Fauci are far more extensive.

Community Notes Gets Another One After Teacher Shares Pornographic LGBT Book and NBC News Lies About It.  In the apparent never-ending quest for some teachers and the mainstream press to normalize grooming, a recent controversy arose in how NBC News decided to report a teacher who showed pornographic materials to her students.  According to the liberal broadcast network, a police report was filed against Sarah Bonner, a teacher in Illinois, after she shared a book called This Book Is Gay in a so-called classroom "book tasting."  When a student brought that book home and their parents found out, they decided to escalate the situation.  Here's how NBC News reported the incident. [...]

NBC News retracts report about 16-year-old migrant working at a slaughterhouse (he was 21).  Earlier this month NBC News had a follow up report about teen migrants working as clearner [sic] in a slaughterhouse run by a company called Packers Sanitation Services Inc. [...] It's both dangerous and illegal for a 16-year-old to be doing this job.  And yet, when the company asked NBC News to identify "Pedro" so they could fire him, they refused. [...] So is it a good thing or a bad thing that Pedro has this job?  NBC seems to be on both sides of this at once.  If it's okay for Pedro to lie and hold down this dangerous job, is it okay for other underage teens to do the same?  Fortunately, the conundrum of protecting the underage slaughterhouse worker from being fired was solved by the company who managed to identify Pedro and discovered he's actually 21-years-old.  NBC has since retracted its original story and replaced it with a new one.

NBC News retracts spurious report on underage slaughterhouse workers.  Recently, NBC News and Noticias Telemundo published a series of reports on minors working for Packers Sanitation Services Inc. (PSSI) cleaning slaughterhouses in the Midwest, as well as a piece about workers using stolen identities to obtain jobs at PSSI.  In the U.S., it's illegal for minors to work in certain dangerous jobs, and this includes slaughterhouses. [...] Perhaps in this case PSSI can sue the NBC news the way Dominion sued Fox News?  As consumers, you have no choice but to presume that all that you see in the news media is false until proven true.

George Floyd riots rewritten as "2020 fires".  Remember the George Floyd riots of 2020? I do.  Vast swathes of my city were burned down including a police precinct — a first.  The City of Minneapolis actually evacuated and abandoned a police precinct and let rioters burn it down.  It was pretty traumatic for the city.  It took days to get the city back under control.  The National Guard had to be called out, and even then it took days to retake the city.  I lent my neighbor a gun.  As a Black man, he was surprised I would and very grateful.  We were in it together, protecting each other against a mob.  He bought a gun soon after.  First time ever for him.  Well my local NBC station has figured out how to describe the destruction during those times.  And it isn't riot.  In fact, nobody did anything at all.  What happened was an event that had nothing to do with human agency:  it was "the fires."  They just sort of happened.

NBC Rediscovers Hunter's 'Much Talked About' Laptop.  On Thursday morning [2/2/2023], NBC's Today rediscovered Hunter Biden's "much talked about laptop" (which in and of itself is comical for a liberal outlet to assert) in order to trumpet Hunter's "aggressive new legal strategy" to force his father's Justice Department and allies in Delaware law enforcement to open criminal investigations of those that shared and promoted its contents, which resulted in "a series of salacious and frankly damaging media stories".  The one minute and 45 seconds of coverage were tacked onto a segment that began with the latest in President Joe Biden's documents scandal. [...] "Much talked about laptop"?  According to a Nexis search, NBC's Today and evening counterpart NBC Nightly News only covered Hunter Biden's life of corruption 16 times in 2022 (eight times on Today, seven on NBC Nightly News) with only six of those hits mentioning the laptop.  This was despite the fact that NBC itself confirmed it was real on May 18 (after The New York Times did so on March 16 and The Washington Post followed on March 30).

'Reporter' Ben Collins Suspended by NBC News for Criticism of Elon Musk.  One of the worst "reporters" in existence has been suspended by NBC News for their criticism of Elon Musk.  Ben Collins, a self-proclaimed "disinformation" expert who often appears on MSNBC as a talking head, was placed on an involuntary leave of absence after comments he made about Musk that NBC News found inappropriate.

Judge Rules Trump Ally Devin Nunes Can Sue NBC Universal for Defamation.  A federal judge ruled on Monday that Devin Nunes, an ally of former President Donald Trump and former California congressman, can sue NBC Universal for defamation.  Devin Nunes filed a defamation lawsuit against NBC Universal in 2021 over a comment made by MSNBC anchor Rachel Maddow about his alleged relationship with a Russian agent. [...] The 22-page decision issued by U.S. District Judge Kevin Castel argued that Maddow failed to cite any source for her claim against Nunes.  Though the judge acknowledged she might have possibly known about a similar accusation in a Politico article, he ultimately ruled that "a court does not weigh competing, plausible theories of actual malice on a motion to dismiss."

NBC's Mystery of the Week: Where in the world is Miguel Almaguer after Pelosi-report retraction?  NBC News' Miguel Almaguer was last seen on the Today show nearly a month ago, giving an update on the Paul Pelosi assault story.  At the time, Almaguer's sources within San Francisco law enforcement told him that body-cam records showed Pelosi opening the door when police arrived, and then walking back toward his assailant:  [Video clip]  NBC News later retracted the story, but didn't explain what Almaguer got wrong.  Almost two weeks later, the local NBC affiliate confirmed Almaguer's initial reporting: [...] The feds don't want to correct the record in their indictment for a reason.  They don't want to have to raise that question in court, or in the court of public opinion either.  Why?  We certainly can speculate on that point.  Apparently, NBC News felt the same way after Almaguer's report.  They retracted it within hours, even though it turned out to be entirely accurate, and Almaguer hasn't been seen on air since. [...] One has to wonder whether NBC News is stuck in a position where they have to keep Almaguer sidelined indefinitely.  They clearly don't want to explain themselves or their actions.  NBC suspended him for reporting what turned out to be true, but which NBC mysteriously claimed didn't meet their "standards."  Presumably, truth isn't a standard at NBC News.

NBC's "disinformation" reporter lives up to his title.  NBC News has a reporter on the "disinformation" beat, and he is really really good at his job.  Every time he puts pen to paper, hands to keyboard, or eyes to camera he spews out a steady stream of disinformation, misinformation, and dystopian fantasy.  He describes himself as on the "dystopia beat," so I guess that makes sense.  He creates a dystopia and reports on his fantasy world.  After the horrific mass shooting at the Colorado Springs gay club Collins helped lead the charge in hanging the responsibility for the shooting on anyone and everyone who opposes transgender ideology.

NBC News Walks Back Report There Was Third Person Inside House During Attack on Paul Pelosi.  NBC News walked back a report Sunday that there was a third person in Paul Pelosi's home during the attack.  "The SFPD also says that there were only TWO people inside the Pelosi home (Paul Pelosi and DePape) when they responded, clarifying statements made at Friday's press conference which seemed to indicate there was a third person inside the home who opened the door," wrote NBC investigative correspondent Tom Winter on social media on Sunday afternoon. [...] Winter reported Sunday morning on Meet the Press that there was a third person inside the home, who opened the door for police.

How to detect a [bad] poll.  I frequently comment on podcasts and elsewhere about some of the methodological problems with current opinion polling, but rather than get into the arcana of sampling difficulties, statistical weighting, question design, etc., let me suggest a simpler method of instantly detecting a [bad] poll:  see if it's from NBC News.  The latest NBC News poll just out finds that 45 percent of voters approve of Joe Biden's performance in office, while 47% of registered voters say they prefer Democrats to control Congress, while 46% want a Republican-controlled Congress.  The numbers tilt a bit closer to other polls showing much wider Republican margins when the domain moves from registered voters to likely voters, though the general conditions this year — and some of the "mood" numbers in this poll — make it hard to qualify "likely" voters.  But the real clue that this is a [bad] poll is the issue that the poll reports is the first choice for most important for midterm voters:  "Threats to democracy" (at 20 percent, just ahead of inflation at only 18 percent).  There are virtually no actual voters who volunteer this answer.

NBC Pushes Midterm Media Poll.  NBC's Mark Murray produces a midterm media poll to frame the 2022 election and claim a tight race for both Democrats and Republicans.  Despite collapsing economic numbers, widespread inflation and disapproval on every category, NBC finds the #1 issue for all voters is "The Threat to Democracy."  [Video clip]  71% of the country say we are on the wrong track (20% approve).  57% of the country disapproves of the job Biden is doing with the economy (38% approve).  50% of the country says things will get worse (20% think will improve).  But it's a close election?  And the #1 concern is "the threat to democracy?"

NBC's Chuck Todd Laughably Insists More Illegal Aliens Will Solve Inflation.  [Scroll down] Abbott and DeSantis have two primary goals, both of which have worked, masterfully.  First, to demonstrate to Democrat city leaders the serious problem created as the influx of illegals continues to decimate border towns.  Second, and most brilliantly, to illustrate the left's complete hypocrisy when illegals show up on their doorstep.  Such was the case when residents of the upscale liberal enclave of Martha's Vineyard became apoplectic when just 50 illegals showed up on their island, prompting them to ship out the illegals within less than 48 hours.  Sorry, Chuck — try harder, next time.

Who are the Good Guys?  Once you start living outside the bubble of the media elites telling you what to think and believe, you find out there are different truths than reported.  Back in 1979, a powerful earthquake hit Managua, Nicaragua while I was there.  When I got stateside, I watched an NBC story that featured a school that was badly damaged.  The on-air personality said that this was the scene of a deadly shootout between government forces and communist guerrillas.  Except, I knew that the school had been damaged in the earthquake and not in a government assault.  I reached out to NBC in New York and was astonished at their lack of interest.  And so, I learned that the national media cannot be trusted.  Why is this important?  The world is moved by the actions of the few, not the many.

The media myth of Democratic momentum.  Many in the media really, really want you to believe that the Democratic agenda led by President Biden is capturing the hearts and minds of voters.  That what was supposed to be a red wave is now becoming a ripple, with the Blue Team instead poised to make gains in November.  It's all wishful thinking, if recent polls — particularly one from NBC News on Sunday — are any indication.  Because any objective person who understands political history knows it's hard to envision how a president who is polling lower than any first-termer in polling history (from Truman to Trump) can possibly galvanize voters to pull the lever for his party.

Chuck Todd Pretends Not to Know Things.  In a segment intended to protect the Biden regime from the outcome of their energy policies, the latest distraction is to claim gas prices are not high when "adjusted" to account for the inflation that Joe Biden has created.  Due to the scale of impact from Biden energy policy there is no real way to obfuscate at a level that hides reality.  However, Chuck Todd from NBC gives it a try.  Comrades, if you can fill up your car with 2010 gas prices, paid for with 2010 wages[,] Then surely you can fill up your pantry with 2010 food prices[,] while living in your house with 2010 mortgage or rent prices... or something.  [Video clip]

NBC Reporter Claims Unborn Babies are "Pregnancies That Will Turn Into Children".  One of the more insufferable liberal hacks out there, NBC correspondent Yamiche Alcindor grotesquely minimized life on Tuesday in the wake of Monday's leaked draft Supreme Court opinion overturning Roe v. Wade, lamenting "women of color... will be forced to have pregnancies that they cannot afford... the will then turn into children" and commiserated with women who believe the end of Roe is "like someone has died."

NBC Sends Letter To Readers Admitting Reporter Plagiarized Stories.  NBC News issued a letter to its readers Monday admitting that a reporter plagiarized several stories over the past year.  The outlet told readers that 11 stories by the unnamed reporter contained passages from other news organizations without attribution and did "not represent original reporting."  The network's editorial team placed an editor's note on each of the plagiarized articles and removed the copy and pasted passages.  "A review by NBC News has found 11 articles written by a reporter over the last year that did not meet our standards for original material," the note said.  "The articles contained passages from other news organizations that were used without attribution.  In all cases, the passages were not central to the stories, but instead contained supplemental or background material that did not represent original reporting."

\What NBC Did to Make Lia Thomas Look More Feminine.  Photojournalist and University of Pennsylvania graduate Erica Denhoff said in an interview this week that a widely-circulated photo she took of biological male swimmer William "Lia" Thomas, who competes on the women's swim team at the UPenn, was altered significantly in a recent news segment to "soften" Thomas' features.  In an interview with the Washington Examiner, Denhoff, who graduated from UPenn in 2008, said that an image she took of Thomas was used on an NBC "Today" segment last week.  She said she thought "something was honestly wrong with the video" when her image of Thomas appeared on the screen.  "To me, it definitely seems like something was going on with the airbrushing/noise reduction of all of Lia's photos in this segment," Denhoff said.  "When I first noticed the airbrushing on the segment referenced, I thought something was honestly wrong with the video.  But then, I watched it again and thought, 'Wait a minute, this appears to be intentional.  Lia's features are softened,'" the photojournalist told the Examiner.  "I then went to my original photo, on the sites that they could access to license the photo, and compared it and immediately saw a difference."

NBC Reporter Insists Biden Canceling Keystone Pipeline Made No Difference On US Dependence On Foreign Oil.  NBC's Chief White House correspondent Peter Alexander repeated White House talking points to his Republican guest during a MSNBC interview on Thursday.  Alexander denied that the Keystone XL Pipeline would've had any impact on the United States' dependence on foreign oil.  Alexander was speaking with former chief of staff for former Vice President Mike Pence, Marc Short, when he started arguing with him over solutions to the U.S.' dependence on foreign energy, amid the Ukraine-Russia war.  He asked Short if President Biden should put embargoes on Russian oil and gas exports, and Short said yes and blamed the Biden administration for making the U.S. more reliant on foreign energy by shutting down the Keystone Pipeline.

Chuck Todd Panel Goes Comedy Gold After Andrea Mitchell Proclaims Journalists 'Are Not Democrats'.  We've written often at this site about Chuck Todd and about his colleague Andrea Mitchell a time or two as well, and it never fails to amaze me how both of them continue to believe that as long as they keep saying journalists aren't liberally biased people will believe them.  In this writer's view, the receipts are pretty substantial if not overwhelming that journalists do indeed harbor a left-wing bias.  For starters, pretty much every poll that has been taken over the last decade on media contributions to politicians shows that the vast majority of journalists contribute either to Democrats or Democrat causes.  That's an objective fact, and one that is often reflected in the way stories are "reported," as we've documented [elsew]here extensively.

NBC op-ed shamelessly smears pro-life movement by linking it to white nationalism.  NBC News ran an op-ed by abortion advocates who spuriously attempted to link the pro-life movement and the March for Life to white nationalism, claiming they are willing to overlook racist agendas in order to form a united front against abortion.  The piece ran on Monday [1/24/2022] and was authored by pro-choice advocates Renee Bracey Sherman and Lizz Winstead who pointed to the Patriot Front crashing the March for Life event last week as proof that the movement supports white supremacists.  They called it a "dog whistle ... coming from inside the house" and alleged that the incident proves pro-life advocates are "ignoring racism."

The Real Disinformation Agents:  Watch as NBC Tells Four Lies in a Two-Minute Clip.  [Video clip]

Democrats are terrified that ordinary Americans are calling them out.  On Sunday's [12/12/2021] Meet the Press, Chuck Todd gathered around him John Heilemann, a leftist journalist; Marianna Sotomayor, a leftist journalist; Brendan Buck, an ostensible Republican who worked for Paul Ryan and John Boehner; and Kimberly Atkins Stohr, a leftist journalist.  All five were unanimous:  democracy in America is over because Americans don't believe that Biden honestly won his seat in the White House.  The hyperbole was thick in the air, along with more than a soupçon of hypocrisy and a huge dollop of fear.

Panic Hits Meet The Press as They Contemplate Collective Media's Inability to Destroy Donald Trump and Manipulate Public Opinion.  The NBC media panel for Meet the Press is absolutely apoplectic about their inability to destroy President Donald Trump and his supportive base of pragmatic, awakened Americans.  The pearl-clutching and fear are palpable, as the leftist roundtable contemplates future elections that may deconstruct decades of election control, manipulation, fraud and falsehood.

NBC: You're not qualified to participate in your children's education.  Welcome to Bizarro World, otherwise known as NBC "Think".  In an essay NBC published last night from Christina Wyman, parents want to have children "indoctrinated" while schools want to free their minds.  Wyman decries parental resistance to progressive pedagogy, arguing that parental involvement in education is as dangerous as it would be to have parents in the operating room.

Divorced From the Truth; Wedded to the Lies They Have Been Told.  At this writing, the verdict in the Kyle Rittenhouse murder trial has not been rendered, so the defendant is still in serious legal jeopardy and the jury could find him guilty. [...] As a casual observer of the trial's progress and witness testimony, I had taken notice that the prosecution was not doing a stellar job.  However, what truly grabbed my attention was that a star prosecution witness, Gaige Grosskreutz, was forced to admit under oath that he did indeed advance toward and threaten Kyle Rittenhouse's life by pointing his illegal handgun at him.  Rittenhouse responded to the threat of bodily harm and shot Grosskreutz in the bicep.  Out of curiosity, I wanted to see how state-controlled media would respond to the devasting cross-examination testimony, so I watched "NBC Nightly News."  In predictable but nonetheless gobsmacking bias, Lester Holt dutifully ignored Grosskruetz's testimony that he had pointed his handgun at Rittenhouse.  Truth ignored, narrative unscathed — unless one has learned not to trust anything the corrupt, partisan media are saying.

Tom Cotton Goes Total Beast Mode on Terry McAuliffe After 'Tiki Torchers' Reportedly Exposed.  We reported earlier on the despicable smear attempt made during an event for Virginia Republican gubernatorial nominee Glenn Youngkin during a rally in Charlottesville that took place this morning.  To recap, a number of individuals were seen in a photo standing in front of the Youngkin campaign's tour bus while carrying tiki torches, with some of the individuals wearing hats that indicated supposed "support" for former President Donald Trump.  To many, it was an obvious effort at invoking images of the tiki torches being carried by white nationalists the night before the 2017 "Unite the Right" rally in Charlottesville, which turned violent when James Alex Fields Jr drove a car into counter-protesters, in the process killing 32-year-old Heather Heyer.  Everything about the photo appeared staged and phony, and RedState cartoonist Jim Thompson's take on it reflects that.  But an oddly incurious local NBC News "reporter" nevertheless tweeted it out unquestioningly.

Andrea Mitchell Falsely Claims GOP 'Booed' Powell at 2000 Convention.  As news broke Monday morning [10/18/2021] of the passing of former Secretary of State and Joint Chiefs Chairman Colin Powell, on NBC's Today show, correspondent Andrea Mitchell jumped at the chance to exploit his death to bash Republicans.  However, in her ghoulish rush to do so, she got her facts wrong when she falsely claimed he was "booed" at the 2000 GOP National Convention.  "I was on the floor of the convention in 2000 in Philadelphia when Republicans booed him," Mitchell proclaimed while calling in to the morning show to share her thoughts on Powell.  She even went so far as to argue that moment began the late General's shift to the Democratic Party years later:  "But he has stood out from his Republican Party even back in 2000 at that convention for speaking up for black rights and eventually did endorse Barack Obama, as you know."

Katie Couric covered up RBG's dislike for taking the knee:  Anchor says she edited 2016 interview to 'protect' the justice.  Katie Couric has admitted to 'protecting' Ruth Bader Ginsburg from public backlash by cutting out negative comments she made about people who kneel during the national anthem.  The former Today show host reveals in her new book that she let her personal political views influence her editing decisions after her interview with the late Supreme Court justice in 2016.

There Are A Lot of Brandons.  The beauty of "Let's Go, Brandon" is how it not only captures the utter contempt that America has for our alleged president, who is currently polling about as well as Michael Moore would be among Golden Corral managers, but how it captures what is either unbelievable cluelessness among the media, or unbelievable mendacity.  Probably some of both.  NASCAR driver Brandon Brown [...] was being interviewed by NBC Sports reporter Kelli Stavast.  Now, NBC is [...] perhaps the most full of it of all networks even in a universe that, for some reason, includes CNN.  The crowd in the background begins a chant.  It's a chant that is sweeping the nation, heard at college football games, rallies, and wherever patriots are gathered.  It's not "Let's go, Brandon." [...] Everyone hates Joe Biden, and this spontaneous chant is a symptom of the disease infecting his poll numbers.

NASCAR Crowd Chants 'F Joe Biden' As NBC Reporter Interviewed Winner Live On TV, Reporter Goes Into Gaslight Mode.  Chants of "F--- Joe Biden" rained down from the crowd at Alabama's Talladega Superspeedway after Brandon Brown captured his first NASCAR Xfinity Series race victory.  The anti-Biden chants came during Brown's post-race interview.  After Brown told a reporter his victory was a "dream come true," the crowd began to loudly shout in unison their displeasure with the president.  An NBC reporter acknowledged the chants but falsely claimed the fans were shouting "Let's go Brandon!"  [Video clip]

The White Backlash That Wasn't.  In a long story featuring analysis of demographic data, NBC News reporter Tyler Kingkade and data editor Nigel Chiwaya claim that the parent uprisings against critical race theory, which have occurred in more than 200 school districts across the country, are a "backlash" against "rapid demographic change" and "the exposure of white students to students of color."  Or, to put it bluntly, it's the ugly reaction of white racism in the face of rapidly integrating schools.  As left-leaning Slate concluded, NBC's reporting proves that fear of "white replacement" and the desire to "protect whiteness" motivate the anti-critical race theory movement.  There is only one problem:  NBC's analysis is nonsense.  The report, like the left-wing narrative about critical race theory more generally, fails both statistically and imaginatively.

Chuck Todd:  There is no liberal media bias.  NBC's Chuck Todd gave a lengthy interview to the Verge in which he was asked about media bias.  Specifically, the discussion started with whether or not Todd would allow Sen. Ted Cruz to appear on Meet the Press.  Todd said he wasn't sure he would because Cruz isn't credible and may just be there to gaslight viewers.  That led to a broader points about objectivity and fairness.  According to Todd, the GOP has repeated claims of media bias to the point where even some liberals believe it.

NBC Goes Full-Bore Crazy Smearing Opponents of CRT as 'QAnon'.  The fight against Critical Race Theory in the schools has had a lot of success.  It's also opened the eyes of a lot of parents.  That's making folks in the NEA and their friends in the mainstream media upset that parents would dare question what is being taught to their children.  So, how to respond to the very successful effort from parents of all races and all political stripes?  Demonize them as conspiracy theorists and QAnon people.  Now it's not just about Russia mania, they've incorporated "QAnon" mania into their thought as well.

Lester Holt:  Poster Child for Media Bias.  [NBC News anchor Lester Holt] views the world through his perspective, assumes he has a correct representation of it in his mind, that anyone who disagrees with him is incorrect.  It also means he thinks every rational person shares his opinion.  If they don't, he considers them benighted, biased, or wrong. [...] Holt said the media's job is to "...help our audiences understand what our role is in a healthy democracy."  What Holt meant was that the media should be the definers of truth, should take its version of the truth and attempt to make it conventional wisdom.  Holt's comments represent a fundamental change in the MSM's perception of itself and its role in today's society.  It is not the MSM's job to take sides on any controversy because, in its view, the effort impedes judgment, biases its search for the truth.  The MSM's "problem" is that most of its journalists believe they are the only valid definers of truth.  This conceit leads them to assume that their truth is the truth.  The media's job is not to determine or define what the truth is.

NBC's Chuck Todd Was Amy Klobuchar's Landlord, Didn't Disclose During Interviews and Coverage.  In 2008, shortly after becoming a U.S. senator, Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) and her husband, John Bessler, began renting a house in Arlington, Virginia, from Chuck Todd, then NBC News' political director. [...] According to Page Six, which first reported the relationship, Klobuchar and her husband paid the Todds $3,200 a month.  This relationship went undisclosed for years, even though Todd went on to question Klobuchar at least eight times on-air during her 2020 campaign, including as the moderator of two of the primary debates.

NBC Cherry Picks Facebook to Discredit Our Republic's Ultimate Defenders.  I read a recent NBC story — In secret Facebook groups, America's best warriors share racist jabs, lies about 2020, even QAnon theories — in which the writer, Carol Lee, alleges radicalization, extremism, and significant racism among US Special Operations Forces (SOF).  Lee bases this over-the-top declaration because she gained access to four "secret" Facebook groups.  She also approached some DoD officials with questions about extremism, leading to some run-of-the-mill responses.  This is at best shoddy journalism and at worst a leftist hit piece on our most elite and dedicated military professionals.  To begin, these so-called "secret" groups are really "members only" groups that anyone can create on Facebook.  No group or page on Facebook is truly private, let alone secret.  One can only assume Lee uses the word "secret" to imply that something nefarious is going on and, by Lee's definition, my members-only neighborhood group page is also secret and should invite media scrutiny.

Brit Hume Gives Lester Holt a Journalism 101 Lesson After NBC News Anchor Claimed 'Fairness Is Overrated'.  My colleague Mike Miller reported Thursday [4/1/2021] on an eye-opening moment that happened earlier this week when NBC News anchor Lester Holt accepted the Edward R. Murrow Lifetime Achievement Award during the 45th Murrow Symposium, which was virtual this year due to the pandemic.  As he gave his speech, Holt told Washington State University's College of Communications that "fairness" in journalism "is overrated," proclaiming that some arguments were objectively true and that their counterarguments did not deserve equal time.

NBC News Anchor: 'Fairness Is Overrated'.  NBC Nightly News anchor Lester Holt says "fairness is overrated" and the news media no longer needs to present both sides of a given story.  Holt, who was this week awarded the Edward R. Murrow Lifetime Achievement Award in Journalism from Washington State University, waxed poetic on the news media, at one point declaring that "it's become clearer that fairness is over-rated."  "Before you run off and tweet that headline, let me explain a bit," he said.  "The idea that we should always give two sides equal weight and merit does not reflect the world we find ourselves in.  That the sun sets in the west is a fact.  Any contrary view does not deserve our time or attention."  Holt said "you won't have to look far to find more current and relevant examples," noting misinformation about the 2020 presidential election and COVID-19.  And the anchor said there's no longer any need for a journalist to give both sides of a story equal weight.

NBC's Chuck Todd:  A Lot People Believe More Pandemics 'Inevitable' Because of Climate Change.  NBC anchor Chuck Todd said Sunday [3/14/2021] on NBC's "Meet the Press" that a lot of people believe it is "inevitable" we'll have more pandemics in the future because of "climate change."

The Editor says...
Chuck Todd made this statement as part of a "question" for Dr. Anthony Fauci, who then failed to take the bait, and didn't mention climate change in his answer.  Chuck Todd attempted to inject global warming into a discussion where it has no place.  That's fake news.

Smug NBC, CNN bigshots report 'petty' Trump didn't offer Air Force plane to Biden.  It was fake news..  NBC News' Kelly O'Donnell and CNN's April Ryan both falsely reported that President Trump did not offer an Air Force plane to President-elect Biden to arrive in D.C. for his inauguration.  Biden instead, chose to charter a private plane with a generic paint job.  CNN's Jake Tapper, O'Donnell, and Ryan labeled Trump as childish and petty for not doing so, but it was Biden who made that choice.  O'Donnell tweeted:  "Arriving on a private charter aircraft with a generic paint job instead of the customary use of an Air Force plane for an incoming president is among the many courtesies not extended to the new president by the departing one."  The tweet is still posted and has not been deleted.

How NBC News Helped the Biden Campaign Ruin an Innocent Man and Bury the Hunter Laptop Story.  Hunter Biden was the October Surprise that wasn't.  A report so explosive, so potentially damaging, so dangerous for national security that it should have destroyed Joe Biden's bid for the White House.  In any other election, fleets of investigative reporters would have been unleashed to verify the claims in the report.  Instead, in the ultimate expression of Trump Derangement Syndrome, a major media company set out to personally destroy the man who they thought put the report together and thereby discredit the report to the point that the entire media complex in America took turns ridiculing the story instead of investigating it.  The results could have dire implications for national security.

As Hunter Associate Steps Forward, NBC Still Claims Story 'Unverified'.  NBC chief White House correspondent Hallie Jackson was a grade-A fake news sprayer Thursday night [10/22/2020], just before the debate as NBC Nightly News was the only evening newscast still desperately trying to defend Joe Biden for the Hunter Biden scandal laptop scandal.  She continued to push the long-debunked claim that the emails were "unverified" and just "a foreign disinformation campaign," the same day a former Hunter business associate came forward with new texts and confirmed the story.  Speaking on what to expect at the final presidential debate later that night, Jackson scoffed at President Trump's strategy of bringing up the Biden family's corruption:  [Lengthy quote omitted for brevity, among other things]  Jackson would later note that Trump planned to "bring a former business associate of Hunter Biden's" as his guest to the debate, and political director Chuck Todd griped about Trump's "special guest" later on.  But none of them cared to tell their viewers more about him.  That's where Fox News Channel's Mike Emanuel and Special Report come in. [...]

QAnon: The Media's Latest Obsession.  Big media has had multiple obsessions during President Trump's first term.  From Stormy and Avenatti to the myriad tell-all books about Trump, his administration, and his family.  From Russia and an innocuous phone call to Ukraine, to his taxes and how many scoops of ice cream he is served.  These are all red herrings, a way to pick at Trump while studiously avoiding serious policy issues, what he is actually accomplishing as president, promises made becoming promises kept.  The latest obsession is QAnon, in the media and recently at the NBC town hall event.  Despite being billed as a question and answer session, it was more of a debate between President Trump and NBC's partisan newsreader Savannah Guthrie.  Of all the issues facing America in 2020 and of concern to voters, QAnon is not on the list.  Yet she laser focused on QAnon starting with[,] "Let me ask you about QAnon" to which Trump responded, "I know nothing about QAnon."  Rather than moving on to the economy or healthcare, she obsessively persisted, insisting that Trump denounce "the fringe conspiracy theory."

Chuck Todd:  The Michigan Supreme Court Did Not "Cite Any Law" In Ruling Whitmer's Actions Unconstitutional.  Chuck Todd interviewed Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer this morning and turned to the recent decision of the Michigan Supreme Court that ruled that she had violated the Michigan Constitution in her extended pandemic orders.  Todd did not challenge Whitmer stating falsely that the opinion was a "partisan" decision.  It was not.  The "Democrat justices" agreed that Whitmer violated the Constitution.  They only disagreed on the remedy.  However, that untruth was quickly lost in what was a flagrantly untrue statement by Todd himself.  He told NBC viewers that the justices did not cite any law to support their decision against Whitmer.  Todd stated as fact that the Court did not "cite any Michigan law, they didn't cite any law in deciding that you didn't have this power."  The roughly 50 page opinion contains over 60 cases discussed in support of the decision.  It does not seem to matter anymore at Meet The Press or NBC.  NBC is not alone.

NBC town hall panned as 'Biden infomercial': 'Undecided voters' didn't seem so 'undecided'.  NBC's town hall featuring Joe Biden did not receive the warmest reception on Monday night [10/5/2020].  The outdoor, televised event, which aired on both NBC and MSNBC, took place in the swing state of Florida and moderator Lester Holt told viewers that all of the Miami attendees were "undecided voters." [...] Then the "undecided voters" were able to speak to the former vice president one-on-one.  Of the roughly eleven voters who were able to ask questions, one was described as "leaning" towards Biden, one was described as a "registered Republican" that was also "leaning" towards Biden, one was described as a former registered Republican who "voted for Hillary Clinton" and other one voted for Clinton in 2016 but he, too, according to Holt, voted for Republicans "in the past."  None of the attendees were described as a Trump voter or "leaning" towards voting for the incumbent president.  All of their questions were primarily focused on Biden's plans as president rather than tough questions that challenged the candidate on his 47-year record.

Bought Referee:  Chuck Todd Argues Only Dems Have 'Met This Moment'.  With the coronavirus relief benefits expiring last Friday, and Democrats and Republicans still in negotiations over what the next round of aid would look like, self-described political referee and NBC political director Chuck Todd showed what a bought off rules enforcer could do during his routine appearance on NBC's Sunday Today. [...] It's worth noting that in addition to Todd's default liberal bent, his pockets get lined with cash from left.  As NewsBusters has previously reported, in 2016 he covered-up how his wife's firm was getting millions from the Bernie Sanders campaign.  Before that, she advised the Jim Webb presidential campaign.  And in early 2020, Page Six exposed how Todd had rented his Arlington, Virginia house to Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN).  And as he was concluding his Sunday appearance, Todd declared that President Trump had "undermined" the outcome of the 2020 election by showing concerns about voting integrity; calling it "deeply dangerous for the democracy."  Yet, MSNBC was still claiming the only reason Trump was president was because of Russia.

MSNBC Evening Shows Gave 137 Mins to Expert Who Said He Had Coronavirus (He Didn't).  For almost two months in his Fourth Watch newsletter, the indispensable Steve Krakauer has been chronicling the strange case of MSNBC/NBC medical and science contributor Joseph Fair, who had claimed in May that he not only contracted the virus, but was hospitalized.  Even worse yet, he surmised he contracted it through his eyes on a flight.  But as Krakauer's reporting showed, it was all a lie as Fair "had at least five negative coronavirus tests" and tested negative for COVID-19 antibodies.  MSNBC and NBC predictably kept their heads in the sand despite this breach of journalistic ethics and peddling of bona fide fake news.

NBC News Spent Weeks Reporting On A Contributor's Journey Battling Coronavirus — But He Never Had It.  NBC News spent weeks documenting its science contributor's battle with COVID-19, but now he admits that he never tested positive for it.  Dr. Joseph Fair, a virologist, believed he had the virus and appeared on air numerous times to discuss his struggle with illness in May and June.  On Tuesday, Fair admitted that he tested negative for the virus multiple times but had originally believed he had it regardless.  Fair also tested negative upon taking an antibody test.

It Would Appear NBC Buried Some Key Details About Their Medical Expert's 'Coronavirus Battle'.  For two weeks, not really a lot of COVID coverage and when the rioting began to subside, we needed to get back inside.  Yeah, not happening.  New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, one of the most insufferable clowns in office, issued an edict banning large crowd gatherings unless you're protesting in support of Black Lives Matter.  They don't even hide their hypocrisy anymore.  Well, over at NBC News, there was something they tried to hide as well regarding COVID, which is that one of their contributors who they peddled as having the virus... never had it.  Former CNN producer Steve Krakauer touched upon this, noting that the network appeared to just ignore that Dr. Joseph Fair had five negative tests regarding COVID.  Oh, and it gets worse, Fair had scores of interviews because he was the man who "recovered" from the virus.  He never had it.  Either this is willful deception or just an epic screw-up.  If it's the former, then welcome to the fake news hall of fame.

NBC Guest Doctor Who Was Suffering from Coronavirus in Hospital in TV Interviews — Never Had Coronavirus!.  Dr. Joseph Fair appeared on NBC and the Today Show nearly a dozen times in May during the height of the coronavirus pandemic in the United States.  Dr. Fair appeared in a hospital bed fighting off the disease with oxygen tubes in his nose when he appeared on NBC.  In one segment Dr. Joseph Fair told the Today hosts, "If it can take me down, it can take anybody."

NBC Science Contributor Who Reported About Having Coronavirus Admits He Never Had It.  NBC and MSNBC science contributor Dr. Joseph Fair documented his battle with coronavirus — until admitting he did not actually have it after all.  The Daily Caller reported Friday:  "Dr. Joseph Fair, a virologist, believed he had the virus and appeared on air numerous times to discuss his struggle with illness in May and June.  On Tuesday [7/7/2020], Fair admitted that he tested negative for the virus multiple times but had originally believed he had it regardless.  Fair also tested negative upon taking an antibody test."  Fair's timeline on Twitter documents his journey over the past two months, from announcing that he had "come down with COVID" on May 13, to revealing on July 7 that he had not.

Let's 'Demonetize' NBC News And Google.  his week saw a depressing new low in the attempt by the left to silence voices with which it disagrees when an NBC News "reporter" tried to enlist Google to block two conservative websites' ability to make money.  In a report on Tuesday [6/16/2020], NBC News' London-based Adele-Momoko Fraser claimed that Google had banned The Federalist and Zero Hedge from its ad platform over articles that were "pushing unsubstantiated claims about the Black Lives Matter protests."  Google soon tried to correct the record, saying that "The Federalist was never demonetized."  Google had only threatened to blacklist the site from its ad network.  (It did "demonetize" Zero Hedge.)  What's more, contrary to NBC News, Google's actions against The Federalist and Zero Hedge had nothing to do with articles they published, but with reader comments on those sites.

NBC Appoints Itself Internet-Speech Arbiter.  Wow.  I guess every day at the "NBC News Verification Unit" is a game of "Two Truths and a Lie."  Yesterday [6/16/2020] NBC News, the employer of Brian Williams and former employer of Matt Lauer, Mark Halperin, and Chris Matthews, revealed that it has an obscure self-described "verification unit" that appointed itself to police American political discourse, and initially reported that Zero Hedge and the Federalist had been banned from generating revenue through widely used Google Ads, deeming their content to be racist.  The report characterized those sites as "far-right," even though the Federalist publishes a variety of right-of-center viewpoints and Zero Hedge is an idiosyncratic libertarian-leaning financial and market news site.

NBC News' Attempt to Demonetize the Federalist Is Illiberal Insanity.  NBC News reported today that two sites, ZeroHedge and the Federalist, had been banned from generating revenue through widely used Google Ads.  A Google spokesperson initially told NBC News that it "took action after determining the websites violated its policies on content related to race."  I don't know much about ZeroHedge, but the contention that the Federalist (where I worked as a senior editor from 2013 to 2019) is "far-right," as reporter Adele-Momoko Fraser claims twice in her piece, is utter nonsense.  The Federalist publishes a wide variety of opinions.  Some pieces are more provocative than others.  Some are very provocative.  So what?  NBC News is trying to make the site sound like the Daily Stormer, when in fact it has contributions from well-known mainstream libertarians, social conservatives, and moderate Republicans.  All of the content falls well within normal parameters of contemporary political discourse — which is exactly what outlets such as NBC News are trying to shut down.

Did NBC and Google engage in antitrust collusion against two conservative sites?  Leftists cannot allow ideological competition.  If their ideas have to go head-to-head with conservative ideology, their ideas lose.  Leftists and other fascists win only by shouting more loudly and breaking things more aggressively than do people committed to individual rights.  Sometimes, though, if you're arrogantly confident that you have the upper hand, you get careless.  That's what happened with NBC and Google when they colluded to demonetize The Federalist and Zero Hedge.  It's no coincidence that the Department of Justice almost immediately afterward announced that it was going to end the immunity that protected internet platforms from antitrust actions if they try to stifle competition — something that may save American Thinker from a demonetizing attack.  There's a lot to unpack here.  First, under §230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996, the big platforms were made immune from liability for third-party content on the ground that they were functioning as bulletin boards, not publishers.  They're still protected even though they're now making judgments about the content (usually in ways that hurt conservatives). They're also immune from antitrust actions if they work with other parties' to silence the latters' competition.

NBC Tries and Fails to Wreck a Conservative Website.  Here's Why It's Deeply Problematic.  If you value a robust media offering a variety of voices, you should be troubled by a chilling incident that occurred this week.  Citing the work of two foreign-based activist groups, NBC News reported Tuesday that Google would demonetize a conservative news and opinion outlet, The Federalist — meaning not allow it to carry Google Ads on its site.  Why?  Because of The Federalist's coverage of the George Floyd protests.  Later that day, Google clarified that its specific issue was the comments section below articles on The Federalist, not the articles themselves.  When The Federalist removed its comments section, Google said it considered the issue resolved.  This episode shows how a media outlet such as NBC News apparently is willing to collude with radicals alongside one of the world's most powerful tech companies to ruin the competition.

Chuck Todd Parrots Idea That the Nation 'Will Not Survive' Trump Reelection.  In the past, Chuck Todd has railed against hyperbole, misinformation and GOP "alternative facts."  But on Sunday, he seemed quite enamored with the apocalyptic sentiment that America "will not survive" a Donald Trump reelection.  NAACP president and CEO Derrick Johnson appeared on the YouTube-only portion of Meet the Press.  He warned, "This nation, not only African-American community, we will not survive if there is a continuation of this administration."  Rather than commit the act of journalism and challenge his guest Todd marveled, "Strong words, President Johnson.  Those are very strong words.  'We will not survive if there's another term.'"

NBC reporter downplays DC church fire as 'some vandalism'.  NBC reporter Tom Costello called a church fire in D.C. "some vandalism" when he was on-air discussing D.C. protests.  "Yeah, it's dead quiet at the moment," Costello said, "Let me just give you the lay of the land.  Across the street here is St. John's Church."  He added, "As you know, that's the church that had some vandalism and President Trump stood in front of with the Bible a few nights ago."  Costello made the erroneous comment on MSNBC's "Live with Stephanie Ruhle," and Ruhle did not correct Costello either.

NBC News Publishes Op-Ed Saying Our American Flag Means Nothing.  NBC News published an op-ed blasting NFL star Drew Brees for criticizing football players who kneel during the national anthem.  The op-ed by Noah Berlatsky goes so far as to say that Brees' "biggest mistake" in defending the American flag was "believing" that it "means anything."  Brees has been hit with an unprecedented amount of backlash this week after simply saying that he does not agree with kneeling during the national anthem.  The New Orleans Saints quarterback said that he views the move as a sign of "disrespect" and shared the story of his military roots.

Meet the Press.  Meet Chuck Todd, the poster boy for biased, unprincipled, activist journalism.  Todd is a perfect example of the modern press.  Mr. Todd's qualifications as a journalist and "political expert" are based neither on achievement nor academic accomplishment.  He possesses neither a journalism nor political science degree.  What he does possess is the only qualification modern "journalists" must hold, a rabid liberal-progressive point of view.

How can NBC not suspend Chuck Todd?  The power of selective video editing is real and profound.  Whether simple maneuvers like eliminating the inclusion of surrounding context, or more complex manipulations involving cutting, splicing, and merging, the ability of media to create a false narrative or misrepresent reality has never been so formidable.

Lame: Chuck Todd Offers Mealy-Mouthed Apology for Deceptive Edit, Blames... CBS?  Behold, the epitome of laziness.  On Tuesday's [5/12/2020] MTP Daily, NBC News political director Chuck Todd offered a muddled and pathetic apology/non-apology for the deceptive edit Sunday's Meet the Press carried out against Attorney General Bill Barr, saying that he was "very sorry for that mistake" but blamed CBS News clips for this kerfuffle.  Only in the final seconds of the 65-second bit did Todd offer the magic words:  "I obviously am very sorry for that mistake.  We strive to do better going forward."  Translation?  Todd admitted that he and his staff weren't engaging in basic journalism or research.

Chuck Todd grievously misquoted Bill Barr on Meet the Press.  On Sunday's [5/10/2020] Meet the Press, host Chuck Todd included a very short clip of a statement Attorney General Bill Barr made during an interview with Catherine Herridge.  In its abbreviated form, the quotation made it sound as if Barr intended to use the Big Brother technique of controlling history by consigning to the waste bin anything countering the official narrative.  In reality, Barr said quite the opposite, standing up for justice and the rule of law.

NBC admits Chuck Todd's 'Meet the Press' deceptively edited Barr remarks on Flynn.  NBC News' Chuck Todd aired a deceptively edited clip of Attorney General Bill Barr discussing the Michael Flynn case during his "Meet the Press" broadcast on Sunday, prompting the network to concede the mistake hours later — but there is still no word on whether Todd will apologize on-air.  Asked by CBS News' Catherine Herridge how history would judge the DOJ's decision to move to dismiss the Flynn case, Barr initially responded, laughing:  "Well, history is written by the winners, so it largely depends on who's writing the history."

NBC News Analyst Claims U.S. Lock-Down Protests Created by Russians.  Oddly enough I thought about this yesterday when Washington State Governor Jay Inslee was complaining about citizen protests being a form of "domestic rebellion."  The modern liberal mindset cannot fathom how removing liberty and freedom, from a nation founded upon freedom and liberty, would start to ignite protests.  They need to blame something.  In the Democrat collective worldview big government control of their lives is a utopia to be achieved.  Therefore those same Chè T-shirt wearing ideologues cannot understand push-back based on individualism.  A justification for visible frustration is needed.  What could possibly be causing this anger?  Why yes, the Russians of course.  Gottabe.

Don't Get Distracted:  Democrats Still Have Eyes on the Prize.  Our major, legacy media press corps criticizes President Trump for not being clairvoyant regarding COVID-19. [...] DMIC [Democrat Media Industrial Complex] "journalists," such as NBC's Peter Alexander, aren't interested in news; they're interested in being the stories themselves.  DMIC coverage isn't about information; it's about narratives, and it's about propagating rote narratives over and over and over and over.

NBC's Chuck Todd Pretends The Left Isn't Politicizing Coronavirus.  Either NBC's Chuck Todd isn't very bright, or he thinks his audience isn't very bright.  On his Sunday broadcast, the journalist interview Vice President Mike Pence on his recent comments condemning people on the left for using "irresponsible rhetoric" when discussing the coronavirus issue.  The host then played a series of clips from conservative pundits lambasting progressives for politicizing the spread of the coronavirus.  One of these commentators was Rush Limbaugh, who excoriated Democrats for having "weaponized" the virus.  Donald Trump Jr. argued that the president's opponents were attempting to "take a pandemic and seemingly hope that it comes here and kills millions of people so that they could end Donald Trump's streak of winning."  Todd then attempted to put the vice president on the spot, intimating that Democrats are not engaging in this behavior.  "None of this seems to match the facts.  What facts are there that Democrats are doing this? ... Seems like people are asking questions, and they're concerned about the virus.  This, this implies some sort of political motivation, which is kind of gross," he claimed.

After FISA Abuse, Chuck Todd Thinks DOJ's Problem Is Too Much Accountability.  So much of the drama of the last three years of the Trump administration is about the conflict between the Constitution, which requires political oversight of the bureaucracy, and the Resistance's strongly held view that political oversight of the administrative state is evil.  The Russia collusion hoax was perpetrated by bureaucrats who admitted they were motivated by a a belief that their foreign policy vision was more appropriate and legitimate than the one chosen by the American people when they elected Donald Trump to be their president.

The Mass Media's Campaign of Moral Panic.  In early October, Chuck Todd stared stone-faced into MSNBC's living rooms and intoned gravely, "I don't say this lightly, but let's be frank — a national nightmare is upon us.  The basic rules of our democracy are under attack from the president[.] ... [T]hat all but ensures his impeachment in the House of Representatives. ... This moment should arguably be a national emergency.  The Founding Fathers would have considered it a national emergency — if the president publicly lobbied multiple governments to interfere in the next election.  It's tough to say lightly, but this is the moment we're at."  Said lightly or not, coming a week after House speaker Nancy Pelosi's announcement of an impeachment inquiry, Charles David "Chuck" Todd — the 12th incarnation of Meet the Press moderators and NBC News's political director, responsible for all aspects of NBC's political coverage — was initiating a "moral panic."  Using his platform as the voice of "the longest-running program on network television," and arguably mass media's highest-profile soldier in the Trump resistance, Todd's intention was deliberate and unmistakable: to instill public fear.  It had moral panic written all over it — perfect for an impeachment.

NBC News Goes Full Fascist:  Voting for 'Racist' Trump Is 'Not Only Immoral but Illegal'.  This is what will happen if the fascist radical left takes over: they will literally attempt to outlaw voting for a candidate they don't approve of.  A week ago, NBC News published an opinion piece that has been largely ignored by conservatives and libertarians.  That is a mistake because author Noah Berlatsky carefully explains to us what he and his fellow extremists think of democracy itself: they hate it and despise it.  Berlatsky's opening salvo is aimed at Donald Trump's 2016 campaign which he deems "openly racist."

The Religious Bigotry of NeverTrumpers.  The mockumentary that aired Sunday on NBC's "Meet the Press" featured many sidesplitting moments; host Chuck Todd and other Democratic activists disguised as journalists spent an hour solemnly discussing the "assault on the truth" inflicted by Donald Trump and his "cult-like" followers.  The very same propagandists responsible for spreading fake news and conspiracy theories about collusion between Team Trump and the Russians proceeded to scold the president, his advisors, and conservatives for allegedly spreading fake news and conspiracy theories.  It was hilarious.  The executive editor of the Washington Post, the news organization that has published thousands of stories pushing the Russian collusion hoax, lamented: "[W]e live in an environment where people are able to spread crazy conspiracy theories and absolute falsehoods and lies."

In supposed apology to Richard Jewell, Tom Brokaw revises history.  Like his deeply flawed coverage of the 1996 Olympic bombing, Tom Brokaw's so-called apology this week to the late Richard Jewell leaves much to be desired. [...] Brokaw's idle speculation and sloppy reporting ended up costing NBC more than $500,000 in a settlement to Jewell.  The network announced the payout in an intentionally vague statement that claimed it had "resolved" its differences with Jewell's lawyers "after a vigorous and thoughtful exchange of views in which both sides defended the correctness of their positions."  NBC's refusal to admit error is important because it brings us to the second problem with Brokaw's supposed apology.  He writes, "when the truth emerged i [sic] apologized."  I find no evidence of Brokaw doing any such thing in 1996 after Jewell was cleared as a potential suspect.  I checked the LexisNexis archives and found nothing.  Searches of NBC News's online properties also yielded no results.

Mueller's Ethically-Challenged 'Pit Bull' Andrew Weissmann Joins NBC as 'Legal Analyst'.  Andrew Weissmann is a former Justice Department official who is known for engaging in ruthless and unethical behavior in several high-profile cases.  Gen. Michael Flynn's attorney Sidney Powell, in fact, made him the lead villain in her book "Licensed to Lie" and has labeled him "the poster boy for prosecutorial misconduct."  Weissmann will be offering advice to House Democrats for their impeachment inquisition against President Trump in his new position at NBC/MSNBC, further confirming the hyper-partisan nature of the Mueller probe.  On MSNBC Wednesday [11/13/2019], he stressed that Democrat lawmakers need to present a case to the American people, arguing that Trump needs to be impeached right away, rather than waiting for the election to decide the president's fate.

Chuck Todd's Softball:  Are Republicans 'Sabotaging' the Impeachment?  Call NBC's Sunday morning show Meet the Press doesn't really meet what you see any more.  Chuck Todd interviewing Democrats sounds more like an episode of Meet the Helper.  Todd's interview with liberal Rep. Jim Himes was all about helping Himes discuss how the Democrats need to break through and impeach the president.  For example, he discussed how Democrats are dropping the phrase "quid pro quo," and asked "Do you feel as if that word doesn't penetrate the seriousness that happened?"  When Todd asked Himes about the Republicans, he helpfully suggested the Republicans might be "sabotaging the process" by having a different narrative that makes the process "hard to follow for the public."  Todd isn't about to make anything difficult for the Democrats.

Why Is Vindman a War Hero but Flynn a Traitor?  The network coverage of the testimony of National Security Council staffer Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman as a "bombshell" and "damning" was laughable and dishonest, implying that his service to his country wearing its uniform made him a credible and unbiased witness without a political agenda.  Particularly egregious were the comments of NBC News anchor Lester Holt, who equated wartime courage with peacetime candor.

Meet the Press: The Ongoing Collapse.  In 2007, a brilliant moderator named Tim Russert hosted the important Sunday news program called Meet the Press (MTP).  Then, 12 years ago, MTP attracted 821,000 viewers aged 25 to 54.  The history of MTP is a storied one.  It is considered the longest-running program in television history with its inaugural episode airing in 1947.  But the days of bipartisan comity and friendly debate ended with the unfortunate passing of Russert in 2008.  After several false starts (does the name David Gregory ring a bell?), Chuck Todd was named the host in 2014.  Unfortunately, Todd turned out to be a disastrous choice.  Todd's extreme partisanship is perhaps guided by his wife (Kristian Denny Todd), who openly runs a Democrat propaganda operation.  The firm provides "direct mail and consulting services for Democratic candidates and progressive causes."  But Todd himself appears to be nothing less than a Democrat activist.

It's Not The News Dividing Us.  It's The News Media.  We on the Right know that narrative is not everything.  The Left thinks narrative establishes the truth, but we know the truth has a voice of its own, and the truth will speak out no matter what story you tell.  Even in the former Soviet Union, where propaganda narrative nearly drowned out reality, reality ultimately had its revenge.  Here, where information still flows around the massive wall of lies built by ABC, NBC, Google and YouTube, the New York Times, CNN and all the rest, the truth's effects are even more immediate when things in the country are going relatively well — and NBC's Chuck Todd comes out and declares we're in a national nightmare because we won't buy into the Democrat's latest absurd impeachment Kabuki show.  It doesn't cause Americans to real in nightmarish horror; it only makes Chuck Todd look like a dishonest child, a hysterical old woman, a scurvy purveyor of false information — plus a hysterical child masquerading as a dishonest old woman.

Chuck Todd — Just Like the Ukraine Hoax — Is Unraveling Before Our Eyes.  Chuck Todd has always had a tough time accepting the results of the 2016 presidential, especially after he declared Hillary Clinton the winner a month before the votes were counted.  And as a result, over the past three years, we've watched Todd beg then-House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) to impeach Trump, and then use BuzzFeed's fake news to assure us Trump's impeachment was guaranteed, and then break the North American speed record for spreading four lies in under a minute, and then completely buy into the Russia Collusion Hoax, and then, [...]

MSNBC: Only Liberal Media Watchers Understand 'Sins of the President'.  Appearing on MSNBC Live With Stephanie Ruhle on Friday morning [10/4/2019], NBC News senior media reporter Dylan Byers warned that President Trump's reaction to the Democrats' impeachment push was a "very strategic effort" and argued that only those getting their news from liberal media outlets would truly understand the "sins of the President." [...] [J]ust minutes before this segment, anchor Stephanie Ruhle declared the President to be a "sociopath" and labeled all Republicans as his "enablers."  Not exactly sober news coverage.

Donald Trump says NBC should fire Debra Messing for calling his black supporters 'mentally ill'.  Donald Trump ratcheted up an attack on 'Will & Grace' actress Debra Messing on Thursday, calling for NBC to fire from the program over her suggestion that Hollywood liberals blacklist wealthy donors of the Republican president.  She also suggested that black supporters of the president are mentally ill.  She since since apologized on Twitter for the 'reckless' action while maintaining that Trump is targeting minorities.

A tough week for NBC!  First, Lawrence O'Donnell got ahead of his source and presented a lie to a national audience.  He said his source had told him that a Russian bigwig had cosigned a Trump loan at a German bank.  Within 24 hours, that story and that source were out running for their lives.  Why?  The source had not seen any of the documents.  It was your classic "we want Trump to fail" so we will just repeat whatever anyone tells us as long it makes the president look bad.  Second, the media ran with another one about President Trump denying citizenship to children of U.S. military personnel.  It was huge, and several Spanish-speaking news services called me for an opinion.  I told them to research the story further, because it did not make any sense.

NBC News:  "Heterosexuality Is Just Not Working'.  Women are increasingly opting out of heterosexuality because it is "the bedrock of their global oppression," NBC News asserted in a bizarre opinion piece this week.  "Men need heterosexuality to maintain their societal dominance over women," writes Marcie Bianco for the NBC News website.  "Women, on the other hand, are increasingly realizing not only that they don't need heterosexuality, but that it also is often the bedrock of their global oppression."

NBC News contributor raises suspicions over Trump's order to fly US flags half-staff until Aug. 8.  NBC News contributor Frank Figliuzzi said Monday [8/5/2019] that President Trump's decision to fly American flags half-staff until Aug. 8, in response to the El Paso and Dayton mass shootings, could be seen by white supremacists as a nod to Adolf Hitler.

Rice Shuts Down NBC Claim Race Relations [are] 'Worse' Under Trump.  During an interview with former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice for the Third Hour Today show on Thursday [6/20/2019], NBC reporter Sheinelle Jones grilled the prominent African American Republican on whether race relations were "worse" under President Trump.  Rice immediately rejected the notion and called on the press to knock off the "hyperbole" in its coverage.

NBC Resurrects Brian Williams.  Former NBC Nightly News anchor Brian Williams whose career imploded after he was caught lying on the air in 2015 about being on a helicopter in a combat zone in Iraq in 2003 has apparently made it back into the good graces at the network.  Williams appeared at the recent upfronts — an annual presentation where networks preview their fall programs for advertisers, which is normally reserved only for the network's stars and an event that Williams hasn't been a part of since his downfall.

MSNBC Reporter Compares Climate Change to Alien Invasion.  On MSNBC Monday afternoon [5/6/2019], NBC News technology correspondent Jacob Ward was so concerned about a new United Nations climate change report that he compared the issue to an alien invasion and feared that humanity was failing to confront an "existential threat."  Even liberal anchor Stephanie Ruhle thought he was going too far.

NBC News CAUGHT Using Fake Photo of Baby With Measles In Pro-Vaccine Segment.  NBC News was caught using a fake photo of a baby with measles in a segment attacking anti-vaccination "myths."  The Christian podcast "A Call For An Uprising" caught NBC in the act.  The photo NBC News used in the segment was merely a doctored stock photo of a newborn baby in a doctor's arms.

If It Walks Like a Spy, Talks Like a Spy, Acts Like a Spy.  Attorney General William Barr used the S-word yesterday [4/10/2019].  In public. [...] He quickly followed by saying, "But the question is whether it was predicated, adequately predicated."  In other words, "Yeah, they spied, but it might well have been by the book."  No matter.  He'd said the S-word and Democrats and the media (but I repeat myself) went apoplectic.  Nancy Pelosi was shaking like she was covered in ants.  Barr is "going off the rails."  Senators Chuck Schumer and Richard "Stolen Valor" Blumenthal demanded Barr retract.  NBC's Chuck Todd, over the sound of Tim Russert rolling over in his grave, moaned "The attorney general gaslit the country."  Todd insisted there's "zero factual basis" for saying Obama administration spied on the Trump campaign.

William Barr Confirms Breitbart News, Mark Levin on Obama Administration 'Spying' on Trump Campaign.  Attorney General William Barr told the Senate on Wednesday that he believed the Obama administration did, in fact, spy on President Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign.  Democrats and their media allies howled in outrage and derision.  Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) said that Barr "is going off the rails."  NBC News' Chuck Todd said that Barr "gave credence to a factless conspiracy theory."  But Barr merely confirmed what is already known.

NBC News, to Claim Russia Supports Tulsi Gabbard, Relies on Firm Just Caught Fabricating Russia Data for the Democratic Party.  NBC News published a predictably viral story Friday [2/1/2019], claiming that "experts who track websites and social media linked to Russia have seen stirrings of a possible campaign of support for Hawaii Democrat Tulsi Gabbard."  But the whole story was a sham:  The only "expert" cited by NBC in support of its key claim was the firm New Knowledge, which just got caught by the New York Times fabricating Russian troll accounts on behalf of the Democratic Party in the Alabama Senate race to manufacture false accusations that the Kremlin was interfering in that election.

NBC, NY Times Set Up 'Trump About To Cave' Narrative.  As the government shutdown barrels toward the one-month mark with no sign Republicans are caving or the president is having second thoughts, the mainstream media has taken to attempting to nudge things in the Democrats' direction.  NBC News attempted to push the president by declaring his poll numbers were declining.

NBC's myth of sawing through the wall.  NBC reporters showed they know as much about saws as they do AR-15s.  The network reported, "President Donald Trump has repeatedly advocated for a steel slat design for his border wall, which he described as 'absolutely critical to border security' in his Oval Office address to the nation Tuesday.  But Department of Homeland Security testing of a steel slat prototype proved it could be cut through with a saw, according to a report by DHS.  I seriously doubt Homeland Security said they sawed through the steel.

NBC News Tries to Excuse Alleged Child Predator with Sob Story.  Identity politics have so warped the establishment media's collective hive minds that, just because he was black and gay, NBC News is singing the praises of a 20-year-old man who allegedly sought out a 14-year-old boy for sex.  In a lengthy piece that has to be read to be believed, here is NBC's glowing biography of an alleged child predator: [...]

Here are the Most Egregious Fake News Stories of 2018.  [#13] Andrea Mitchell says disgraced Florida election official is a Republican:  Allegations of voter fraud and electoral misconduct in Florida during the 2018 midterms brought Broward County Elections Supervisor Brenda Snipes into the spotlight.  Snipes, a Democrat, had been accused of misconduct in the past and was slammed again for violating Florida election law.  NBC's Andrea Mitchell bafflingly said on air that Snipes is a Republican and "hardly a Democratic official, or someone doing the bidding of the Democratic candidates there."

NBC Tries, Fails To Defend Itself After Sitting On Information That Undermined Kavanaugh Accusers.  An NBC reporter who interviewed one of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh's accusers, and who admitted to sitting on evidence that two of his accusers were not credible, is now trying to defend herself and her network.  It's not working. [...] Last Thursday [10/18/2018(?)], NBC acknowledged that a second accuser represented by attorney Avenatti, whose name is still unknown, said her words were "twisted" in her sworn statement and that she never saw Kavanaugh spike punch or act inappropriately toward women.  NBC had this information days before Kavanaugh's confirmation vote, but didn't report it until now.  On Saturday, Snow took to Twitter to defend herself and her network for sitting on information that could have helped Kavanaugh gain some of his reputation back after the salacious allegations.

Why Did NBC And Time Magazine Sit On Their Avenatti Scoops For So Long?  I think Time has an excuse.  I can't imagine what NBC's excuse is.  Remember that newsy quote from him about Democrats needing to nominate a "white male" to stop Trump in 2020? That came from a story in Time magazine.  Avenatti responded predictably when liberals began attacking him over it yesterday, crying FAKE NEWS and demanding that Time reporter Molly Ball provide the full context.  So she did.  Here's the transcript posted last night of her exchange with Avenatti.  Note the date. [...]

NBC News Hid Information that Would Have Cleared Kavanaugh of Avenatti Rape Allegations.  NBC News deliberately hid vital information that would have helped clear Brett Kavanaugh of the serial rape allegations Julie Swetnick and her attorney, Michael Avenatti, leveled against him.  On September 16, Kavanaugh and his loved ones were dropped into a pit of hell due to allegations of sexual assault from Christine Blasey Ford.  Although her story quickly fell apart during public testimony, for the three-plus weeks that would follow, in an effort to derail his confirmation, Democrats and their allies in the establishment media did everything in their power to personally destroy this man as a drunken serial rapist.  NBC News and Avenatti played a huge role in this obscene smear campaign.  One notable example was NBC breathlessly publishing and airing an assault allegation against Kavanaugh that was quickly exposed as a hoax.  NBC did not even bother to independently corroborate this allegation prior to airing it.  A Democrat handed NBC the smear, and NBC ran with it.

After Promoting Avenatti Accusers NBC Tries Walking Quietly Toward the Exits.  Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley sent a criminal referral to the DOJ today surrounding Creepy Porn Lawyer Michael Avenatti and claims from the accusers he brought forth.  Hours later, all of a sudden NBC, the primary advocacy media for Avenatti and his accusers, starts publicly questioning the details of their interactions?

NBC Belatedly Corrects Fake News Story on Trump and Robert E. Lee.  NBC News issued a correction Sunday of its inaccurate tweet Friday that President Donald Trump had praised Confederate General Robert E. Lee at a rally in Ohio, misquoting the president and leaving out the context that he was setting up praise of Union General Ulysses S. Grant.

Fake News and News Fraud.  Rather than functioning as a news organization, NBC news simply allowed itself to be used as a PR outlet promoting the clearly self-interested complaints of its source, just as Andrew Duehren at The Wall Street Journal did the following day.  And why?  This isn't "fake news."  It is news fraud.  It is a conscious failure to cover an equally critical part of a news story that isn't hidden, but sitting there in plain sight.  It is a conscious choice by a news organization to only run the allegations of a source and allow selective use of a tape offered as bait to support those allegations and in the process provide only negative information on the Trump administration. [...] "Fake news" may often be a matter of opinion, but a blatant case of intentional news fraud against the fair presentation of a news story of interest to Americans is hard to miss.

My Declaration of Incivility.  All around us the organized left (establishment media, Hollywood, and Democrats) are lamenting the loss of civility.  Of course, to express this lament, they must first take a break from calling us [names] throughout the halls of the U.S. Capitol.  Oh, and they must also take a break from bullying us out of public spaces and calling for more even more mobs to be vigilant so we face a "life sentence" of bullying.  With no professional consequences, NBC News is not only calling Trump a "Nazi," NBC News is smearing his supporters as "Nazis" — and I do not mean figuratively.  NBC News is not being coy about calling us Nazis.  NBC News is not nibbling around the edges of calling us Nazis.  NBC News is straight-up calling us Nazis.

The Top 50 Liberal Media Bias Examples.  [#12] Fake Exploding GM Trucks:  In 1993 on its Dateline NBC program, NBC News was determined to smear trucks made by General Motors.  The TV newsers wanted to show America that the gas tanks in GM trucks were prone to exploding.  Dateline aired footage of just that causing a PR nightmare for GM.  Ultimately, NBC had viewers convinced that GM's "sidesaddle" gas tank was a hazard.  But in its zeal to destroy GM, NBC forgot to mention one little thing to the viewing public.  Its video of an exploding gas tank was little else but Hollywood special effects.  The video did not show an actually exploding gas tank, but one rigged to explode on cue by NBC's special effects artists.  NBC's anti-capitalist crusade turned into a circus and network had to apologize for its lies.

'Fake Pocahontas' Warren Sends Up Smoke Signals on Any New EPA Chief.  This past week, President Trump held a campaign rally in Montana for the Republican running against Jon Tester who spread vicious stories about Trump's doctor who was nominated to lead the VA.  He had to resign over the false rumors.  During the rally, the President jokingly offered a million dollars to Elizabeth Warren if she would take a DNA test to prove her so-called Native-American heritage.  It is a claim she has used so well to get ahead.  After the rally, NBC embarrassingly tried to defend her with an obviously deceptive report.  NBC 'News' no longer even tries to pretend they're reporting honestly.  They said DNA tests can't qualify for tribal citizenship.  No one asked for Warren's proof of tribal membership.  One must wonder who came up with that argument.

Earth to NBC: Russians did not change one vote in 2016.  CNN just lost its Fake News crown to NBC.  Its effort to win the gold has been Olympic this month.  The network sent its anchor to Pyongyang to show what a paradise North Korea is.  Then it (and the rest of the Fake News media) fawned over Caligula Jong Un's sister.  Then it lied and said Koreans admire the Japanese.  No, Koreans hate the Japanese after 35 years of cruelty when Japan colonized Korea.  Now the Trump administration is pushing back twice as hard.  The subject is not the Olympics.  The subject is Fake News reporting by NBC on the long discredited Democratic Party's excuse that Russia meddled in the past presidential election.

NBC News Presents Eight-Month-Old 'Russia Hacked the Election' Story as 'Breaking News'.  NBC News conducted an interview with Obama era Department of Homeland Security (DHS) cybersecurity chief Jeanette Manfra Wednesday [2/7/2018], then tweeted out a largely inconsequential revelation from last year as "BREAKING" news. [...] Compounding NBC News's erroneous "breaking" claim is that the original, five-month-old revelation later was proven to be wildly exaggerated and amounted to very little.


Time magazine

Time Magazine Pays the Price for Lost Credibility.  Last week in this space the focus was on Time magazine's glorification of now Democrat presidential nominee Vice President Kamala Harris.  The point was that the then-current cover of Time — an illustration of Harris that, as noted, presented her as "a cross somewhere between Miss America and a religious icon" — was in reality an illustration of just how the "mainstream media" was thoroughly in the tank for Democrats and the Left in general, and, this election year, Harris in particular.  A week later, the New York Post is headlining another story about Time — a story that might be seen as reporting on the consequences for Time for tilting so visibly for Democrats. [...] This isn't rocket science.  The problem is that the "journalists" involved, whether at Time or other so-called "mainstream" publications are in fact seriously Left minded Leftist activists pretending — to themselves and readers — to be something they are not.  Which is politically neutral, "just the facts" journalists.

For the geniuses at Time magazine, it's news when a woman gets pregnant.  When I was growing up, Time magazine was a staid, very middle-of-the-road publication.  Now, it's a rag so radical that it felt compelled to publish a long screed about how Florida's 15-week abortion limit is causing problems for "trans men" who didn't understand that continuing to have heterosexual intercourse could lead to pregnancy.  Shefali Luthra, the article's author, is a young pro-abortion activist.  She recently published a book entitled Undue Burden:  Life and Death Decisions in Post-Roe America. [...] Clearly, the entire essay is nonsense, but it's nonsense that has legs because America has spent two decades indoctrinating people to believe that there's no connection between biological reality and people's behavior and the consequences flowing from that behavior.  If biological women have sex with biological men, biological babies can occur, and that's true even if one of the parties has been poisoning his or her body with opposite-sex hormones.

Here are the Most Egregious Fake News Stories of 2018.  [#23] Time magazine's family separation cover featuring crying Honduran child:  Time Magazine published an infamous cover in June that showed a Honduran child crying at the U.S. border, apparently after she had been separated from her mother.  The image quickly became the face of the "issue of family separations at the border," despite the fact that the child in question was never separated.

TIME Stands By Erroneous Crying Girl Cover Story Because Of Its Propaganda Value.  TIME magazine is standing by a cover photo and story critical of Trump's immigration policies that reporters exposed Friday as factually incorrect, wildly misleading, and lacking important context.  The cover features a 2-year-old Honduran girl sobbing as she looks up at Trump, with the words "Welcome to America."  Inside, TIME reported the little girl was one of those separated from her mother because of the Trump administration's zero tolerance policy on families crossing the border illegally.  She was taken "screaming" from her mother by border agents, the report claimed.  The photo and story made a big splash in the media war over the separation policy, which Trump has since ended, but both have now been completely dismantled by the press, resulting in a major correction.

Time apologizes for cover story about migrant girl.  Time magazine has issued a correction to a controversial cover story about a Honduran migrant girl who they said was taken from her mother by US border patrol agents after it was revealed that the pair were never separated at all.  Three-year-old Yanela Denise became the unintentional face of the now defunct family separation crisis after photographer John Moore captured her agonized face screaming as her mother was questioned by agents on June 12.  After the picture was taken, the pair were taken together to a family detention center.  Yanela's father has since told DailyMail.com that they are 'safe'.

Father says little Honduran girl on Time cover was not taken from mother.  The Honduran toddler pictured sobbing in a pink jacket before U.S. President Donald Trump on an upcoming cover of Time magazine was not separated from her mother at the U.S. border, according to a man who says he is the girl's father.

Mother Of Crying Child Was Previously Deported In 2013.  The mother of the crying child featured on the cover of TIME Magazine was previously deported from the United States in 2013, according to ICE.  TIME Magazine pasted the image of the young girl crying as President Donald Trump looked down on her, attempting to symbolize the administration's zero-tolerance immigration policy at the border that leads to family separations.  The father of the child later revealed that the girl was never separated from the mother and that the child was only briefly set down so that border patrol agents could perform a pat down.  The mother also left three other children behind in Honduras.

Fake photo, fake news, fake media and the engineering of fake outrage to push an open borders invasion of America.  The now-infamous "family separation" photo [...] taken by John Moore and licensed by Getty Images, has become the emotion-infused rallying cry for fact-devoid Leftists to demand unlimited open borders that would flood the United States with illegals.  It has now emerged that the photo is "fake" in the sense that the girl wasn't separated from her mother at all.  Young girls cry for a million reasons:  They're sleepy, they want more ice cream, they don't like the food, and so on.  But the deceptive left-wing media claimed this girl in particular was crying because she was forcibly separated from her mother by U.S. Border Patrol.  That claim, we now know, is a complete lie.  But it fits the convenient narrative of the insidious Left — which cares nothing about actual facts — and so the photo has been widely circulated on Fakebook and even used to raise nearly $20 million in donations for pro-open borders front groups.

TIME Magazine admits screaming migrant girl cover is FAKE news, but says it "captures" a real story, so it doesn't matter.  The cover [of Time magazine] features a crying two-year-old Honduran girl who appears to be looking up at President Donald Trump, who is looking back down at her dispassionately.  The cover comes with the caption:  "Welcome to America."  The story inside is another Left-wing hit piece criticizing the Trump administration's practice of separating some migrant children from the lawbreaking adult parent as it enforces a "zero-tolerance" policy of prosecuting all illegal crossers.  But there's a catch regarding the cover photo of the little girl:  She was never separated from a parent.  It's a lie.  It's the fakest of fake news.  It's intentionally misleading.  It's a hoax.

Time Magazine Stands by Its Fake Cover, Misleading Story.  The profound irresponsibility of the media reached fever pitch this week.  The absence of any sense of guilt on the part of the 'journalists' is frightening.  They don't even recognize the inherent evil in what they are doing. [...] News outlets are not seeking the truth.  They believe Trump is a danger to America and they are justified in doing whatever they want or have to do.

Sarah Sanders Torches Media over Immigration Photo Hoax.  White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders blasted the establishment media Friday for spreading a now-debunked hoax-photograph featuring a little girl crying at the border.  "It's shameful that dems and the media exploited this photo of a little girl to push their agenda," Sanders tweeted.  "She was not separated from her mom.  The separation here is from the facts.  Dems should join POTUS and fix our broken immigration system."

Fake News:  Iconic Crying Migrant Girl Was Never Separated from Mother, Says Father.  The father of the tearful two-year-old Honduran migrant girl who became the face of the "family separation" news coverage says that his young daughter was never actually separated from her mother when caught by U.S. Border Patrol.  Instead, he says, his daughter and her mother are together in U.S. custody at "at a family residential center in Texas."  Moreover, the mother had been deported from the U.S. in 2013, according to a statement given by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to Buzzfeed on Thursday evening [6/21/2018].

[The] Crying migrant child in [a recent] photo [was] never separated from her mother.  Now the facts come out, and pretty quickly, too.  Somene tracked these people down and asked them about it, and now we learn the real story:  Turns out the kid was never separated from her mother, not once.  The girl's father, Denis Javier Varela Hernandez, was located by the always-on-the-job Daily Mail, and told a very different story from what the press had been reporting.  One, the kid wasn't separated.  Two, family separation indeed occur, from the Honduran illegal immigrant's side.  The girl's mother had actually abandoned three other children and her father, to take the one-year-old toddler, through the hands of smugglers, to the U.S. illegally, without the father's permission.  She in fact didn't tell anyone.  Three, this was no poverty story:  The kid's expensive shoes and jacket offered a hint of that in the photo, but now it turns out the mother apparently lived a very wealthy life, her spouse or babydaddy a sea captain over in Puerto Cortes.  She had a spare $6,000 handy to pay a human smuggler for the crossing, according to the father.  Oh, and she's been deported before, in 2013, a multiple entry case with little regard for U.S. law, as so many of them are.  And instead of inhuman treatment, the father says she's comfortable and well-cared for by Americans over in McAllen, Texas.

Fake Time magazine cover
Time Magazine Stands by Its Fake Cover, Misleading Story.  The Time Magazine story gets more absurd by the day.  It is perhaps the worst example of fakery and yellow journalism yet.  Time Magazine is standing by their fake cover story of a crying 2-year old Honduran girl because it offers the propaganda they are looking for.  The cover features a 2-year-old Honduran girl sobbing as she looks up at Trump, with the words "Welcome to America."  They pretended the tiny child was separated from her mother.  As it happens, the little girl was crying because she was in the hot desert and it was 11 at night.  The mother abandoned her husband and three children in Honduras where her husband has a good job as a ship's captain.  She took the toddler as insurance to get into the country.  It's her second illegal entrance, making it a felony.


Thoughts on Crying Babies, Dying Babies, and Media Deception.  Also this week, "TIME magazine featured a picture of a crying illegal immigrant child on its cover.  The child was supposedly separated from her parents; over her looms Donald Trump, smugly staring down at her."  And the cover caption reads, "Welcome to America."  What a brute he is!  What a heartless monster!  What an evil man!  But, as Ben Shapiro notes, "There's only one problem:  the cover is total bull.  It's not just total bull because Trump hasn't implemented a newly-developed policy of separating children from parents — that's an operation of law under the Flores settlement as modified by a 2016 Ninth Circuit court ruling.  It's bull because this particular child wasn't separated from her mother, her mother wasn't fleeing persecution but did falsely claim asylum, her mother did put the child in danger, and Trump was targeted by the media for treating this mother and child exactly the same way the Obama administration would have."

Liberals Are Pushing The Country To The Edge.  Time magazine used to be important, used to have standards.  But when they used the picture of a little illegal alien girl who was not separated from her mother on their cover to represent all illegal alien children at the border because she was crying and perfectly fit their narrative they crossed a line.  When they were informed of the fraudulent nature of the picture they chose to ignore it, choosing activism over accuracy.  They chose emotion over truth.

Crying migrant girl's dad says she wasn't separated from mom.  The sobbing Honduran toddler in a pink jacket — whose photo was placed alongside an image of President Donald Trump for an upcoming Time magazine cover — wasn't actually separated from her mother, her father said.  The picture of the crying little girl — taken at the US-Mexico border by Getty Images — became a symbol of the movement against Trump's "zero tolerance" policy, which tore more than 2,000 children from their parents.  "My daughter has become a symbol of the ... separation of children at the US border.  She may have even touched President Trump's heart," Denis Valera, who said he was her father, told Reuters.

Time magazine cover features Trump staring down a crying migrant child.  The latest cover of Time magazine criticizes President Trump's tough border policy, by showing him looking down at a crying, two-year-old Honduran girl whose mother was detained after crossing the border.  The photoshopped image is the latest ding against Trump and his zero tolerance policy, which led to the increased family separation of illegal immigrants.  The cover is captioned, "Welcome to America."

You Know The Real Reason Why Time Mag Is Going Down the Drain?  The Content!  For all the tears that get shed over the beginning of the middle of the end for Mr. Luce's mag and newsweeklies in general, one obvious explanation generally gets glossed over:  They are mostly written by conventional-wisdom mongerers who can barely finish shipping an issue of "Why Dinosaurs Believed in God" and "The Mother Mary Holy Water Diet" before rushing out something like this time-waster by esteemed historian David M. Kennedy.

Time: Right-Wing Militias Are The Real Threat To Cops.  Time Magazine warned of a growing threat to cops nationwide in September 2010.  The nationally renowned publication argued that sinister individuals would launch targeted attacks against police officers and even ambush them in their patrol cars.  Time alerted readers that these groups and individuals have a disturbing hatred of cops and that there was a real threat of "lone-wolf" attacks.  Who are these groups that present such a threat to police? Right-wing militias, according to Time.

Hey, Fareed, You've Got a Paragraph; You Didn't Write That.  In penning his recent piece "The Case for Gun Control," Time editor and CNN host Fareed Zakaria actually made the case that he needs to focus on pen control.  Because he plagiarized part of his work from a New Yorker article written by one Jill Lepore.  Zakaria was busted by NewsBusters, a feat that probably wasn't too difficult since Lepore's piece was published less than four months ago.

Will Yale Fire Fareed Zakaria?  There is now little question that Fareed Zakaria is guilty of plagiarism.  He has admitted copying a portion of a New Yorker essay and apologized.  Time, where Zakaria works as a columnist, has suspended Zakaria for a month, and CNN — owned by the same parent company — has suspended him pending an investigation.  This represents a mere slap on the wrist for someone whose standard speaking fee is $75,000.

A few days later...
Fareed Zakaria's suspension lifted by CNN and Time.  All is forgiven for Time magazine writer and CNN host Fareed Zakaria, who last week was suspended by both outlets for apparent plagiarism.  CNN said on Thursday [8/16/2012] that Zakaria's weekly "GPS" public affairs program will return to the air on 26 August.

The Washington Post

Washington Post Columnist Jen Rubin: 'Republicans Want to Kill Your Kids'.  Jen Rubin, a columnist for the Washington Post, has truly lost her mind.  This has been building for several years now.  The 2016 election of Donald Trump broke her mind and since then, instead of finally coming to her senses, she has gotten progressively worse.  This goes beyond Trump Derangement Syndrome.  This woman obviously has serious mental health issues but for some reason, is still employed by the Post.  Rubin was recently doing some sort of podcast type of broadcast, and while offering political advice to the left, suggested saying that Republicans want to kill your kids, which she then tried to explain as factually true.

Media Claims Woman Was Arrested For Miscarriage.  Here's What Really Happened.  Ever since Roe v.  Wade was overturned and abortion was returned to the states, the media has been searching for stories of pregnant women to use as pawns to demonize those against abortion.  This week, The Washington Post published a story about a Nevada woman who had a miscarriage and was arrested and charged with manslaughter.  The story was widely shared on social media, with New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof amplifying that narrative.  [Tweet]  It appears Kristof, like many others, didn't read the full Post story, which explains — albeit while attempting to downplay the situation — that Patience Frazier did things intended to end her pregnancy and admitted as much to law enforcement.  For starters, Frazier's arrest took place in 2018, four years before Roe was overturned.  Abortion is also legal in Nevada, even now that Roe is no longer in place.

Staffers quit and 200,000 subscribers cancel after WaPo says its role is to report the news.  Given their mission to report facts, the Post generally refused to endorse particular political candidates.  Individual opinion columnists of course expressed their support for candidates of their choosing, but the Board of Editors did not endorse those candidates, at least not explicitly.  Only relatively recently, in 1976, did they begin routine endorsements.  At that time, they were at the height of their power and could afford whatever ill will their endorsements generated among some readers and staff.  Their endorsements were almost always of Democrats:  Jimmy Carter, Walter Mondale, Michael Dukakis, Al Gore, John Kerry, and so on.  It was predictable.  There are several problems with predictable endorsements.  The first is that they have no persuasive power.  If the Post always endorses the Democrat, then who is going to be persuaded by their endorsement of the Democrat this time?  The second problem is that endorsements predictably favoring one political party risk the reputation of the newspaper as an objective source of news.

Uncovering the Coverage.  I first heard it, very faintly, in 2017.  At the time, President Donald Trump was accused of spying for Russia.  If true, this would have been the biggest act of treason in American history, bigger than Aldrich Ames, bigger than the Rosenbergs, bigger than Benedict Arnold.  The New York Times and Washington Post published long articles that detailed Trump's treachery, for which they shared a Pulitzer Prize.  Adam Schiff, head of the intelligence committee, stood up night after night on cable news, claiming he had secret "bombshell" information proving that Trump was a traitor.  The charges were investigated and ultimately dismissed.  Trump was not a Russian agent.  He was not working for Putin.  The greatest security threat in the history of the country was — a hoax.  And then I heard it:  nothing.  Very few outlets reported that Trump was innocent, that the attempt to rout him from office had failed.  Schiff disappeared from view.  There were no corrections, no apologies, no firings.  The Times and the Post did not return their Pulitzer Prizes.

Blaming Trump for His Assassination Attempt Just Took an Insane Turn at The Washington Post.  The former president dodged a bullet — literally — while golfing at Trump International Golf Club in West Palm Beach, Florida, over the weekend.  Ryan Wesley Routh was hiding in a shrubbery along the course for 12 hours before Secret Service agents discovered his location while doing a routine security sweep ahead of the president and uprooted his evil plan.  The course was not fully cleared before Trump's arrival, and there are questions regarding whether a drone should have been used again.  Yet, the media knows the real culprit of this story is Donald J. Trump.  The victim-blaming has been insufferable.  It's a game the Left will lose since their lack of principals and overall intelligence allow for pervasive outmaneuvering when the rubber hits the road.  If Trump is responsive for January 6, a standard liberal narrative, then Democrats are responsible for inciting Routh and Thomas Matthew Crooks, the Butler rally assassin, into killing a presidential candidate.  The publication highlighted Trump's love of golf to frame their 'he was asking for it' narrative:  [Tweet]

WaPo: Kamala is joy, Trump is misery.  [Scroll down]  The progressive energy and spending policies of Kamala Harris have caused high inflation everywhere — remember she was the deciding vote on the Inflation "Reduction" Act.  The Democrats have given Russia and Iran the ability to finance wars and terrorism with high crude oil prices, and their open border policies have been destroying the United States since the day they took office.  But, Harris is the "joyful" candidate: [...] Kamala's "optimistic" view consists of lying; she continually lies that the U.S. will not survive if Trump is elected, because she continually lies that Trump is a dictator.  A nation where illegals seize control of apartment complexes?  Where people can't afford groceries?  Where the prospect of home ownership for ordinary Americans is rapidly evaporating?  That's an "optimistic" future?  Trump's "pessimistic" view is when he tells the truth about the damage that Kamala has caused with her big government policies, which would only worsen with four more years.

As Usual, The Washington Post Gets an Election Story Wrong.  One of the problems with reporters for The Washington Post is that they repeat the claims of liberals as if they are facts, without questioning the claims or pointing out the patently obvious problems with clearly false accusations.  You can see that in a Page One story Saturday in which the Post blithely reports that "critics" of a new rule approved by the Georgia State Election Board say it "would empower county election officials to withhold certification of results without justification, potentially thwarting a popular result."  Nothing could be further from the truth, as is discernible by a simple reading of the rule, which the five-member Georgia State Election Board approved Aug. 19 by a vote of 3-2.  Yet the Post offered no explanation as to how that claim is demonstrably wrong.  Given the Post's bias, we shouldn't be surprised by its shoddy journalism[.]

New Twists in the DNC Hack Saga.  [Scroll down]  All these facts illustrates how flimsy the entire DNC hack narrative is.  Yet, that narrative remains deeply entrenched.  While even the media now admits that the Steele dossier was fabricated, they consistently fall back on the claim that Russia hacked the DNC and, therefore, interfered in the 2016 election to help elect Trump.  We have challenged this narrative from day one for several reasons.  First, there has never been any evidence presented that definitively points to Russia.  Second, the Washington Post's involvement so early in seeding the narrative suggests that the narrative is likely false.  Third, CrowdStrike's immediate conclusion that it was Russia is equally suspect, especially considering that when CrowdStrike was brought before Congress to repeat their claims under oath, they could not.  Instead, when under oath, CrowdStrike stated that they only suspected it was Russia but did not possess any hard evidence.  Fourth, the FBI and Mueller's team vigorously promoted the narrative of Russian hacking, despite never having physical possession of the DNC's server.  They relied on CrowdStrike's unsound assertions and their own preferred narrative.

More Proof That Fauci, Washington Post Lied About Beagle Torture Program.  [Scroll down]  In the intervening years, we've learned that the Washington Post was either intentionally lying or exceptionally lazy, or both, in that the Beaglegate torture scandal was absolutely true, the confirmation of which we only got through the diligent efforts of actual journalists and advocacy groups like WCW Project.  Even more [...] evidence has recently emerged that, on the same day Fauci and Co. were whispering denials into Washington Post's ear, which the paper dutifully reprinted, the State Department was well aware of the Fauci Beagle torture regime and in active communication with the NIH-funded lab in question.

Biden and Harris debut plan to overhaul Supreme Court — with focus on limiting Trump's powers.  President Biden formally unveiled his planned overhaul of the Supreme Court on Monday — with a clear eye on limiting the powers of former President Donald Trump should he succeed him.  The commander-in-chief took the unusual step of unveiling his major planned policy steps in a newspaper op-ed, with the Washington Post helpfully telling readers: "The writer is president of the United States."  Biden laid out three main changes to the court — which he said is "mired in a crisis of ethics" — including term limits and a binding code of conduct.

The Editor says...
I find it difficult to believe the Washington Post's claim that "The writer is president of the United States."  The man pretending to be the President is only awake for a few hours a day, and was unable to assemble a meaningful sentence during the televised debate a few weeks ago.  When somebody else writes a sentence for him, he can just barely read it off the teleprompter.  Nice try, WaPo.

WaPo Editorial Board Writes Weird Fan Fiction Withdrawal Speech for Biden.  I admit it.  I did not predict that the Washington Post editorial board would write a speech for President Biden in which he eloquently — lyrically even — agrees to withdraw from the 2024 presidential race.  But write it they did Wednesday, and it reads as if it were penned by a 19-year-old Vassar student who perhaps may have consumed a mind-altering substance and is now deep inside an almost otherworldly fantasy.

Sensationalist blabber from the Washington Post.  In The Washington Post's "Genocide is our redline" (6/9/24, before the title was changed), there are so much manipulation, distortion, and outright lying that it's hard to encompass it all in a short response.  Israel is not only innocent of this sick crime, but is facing an enemy that boasts in its charter about committing it.  This inversion of thought is right out of George Orwell's 1984.  The title is an absolute lie — even if it's a quote from a Palestinian who makes this charge of Israel.  There is no genocide in Gaza.  And no matter how many times it's repeated in chants, legacy media articles, legacy TV reports, many forms of social media, it doesn't make it so. [...] One can't rightly be the aggressor and then claim that the other side is committing genocide when it fights back.  What an absurdity.  Hamas and Gazan civilians are getting killed because they initiated a war and are continuing to fight — even if they are losing terribly.  It's on them.

With Summer Heat Wave Expected, Be Prepared for What the Climate Change Nuts Will Do.  Despite the fact that summer, and the heat associated with that season, comes around reliably every year, the climate activists behave as if such a thing has never happened before.  Ever since "global warming" and "climate change" (formerly known as "weather") became the environmental bogeymen, any slight increase in temperature over the summer has been spun as the first sign of the climate apocalypse.  And, this summer's impending heat wave is no different.  According to The Washington Post, the U.S. will be assaulted by abnormally high temperatures thanks to a "heat dome" forming over the mainland United States.  Apparently, temperatures in most of the continental U.S., especially in the Southeast and the Midwest, are projected to reach the high 90's and potentially stay that hot at least through June.  The National Weather Service likewise predicted that, with the humidity, the overall heat index for states from Texas to Washington, D.C., could reach as high as 100 to 110 degrees.

The Editor says...
Lots of things could happend this summer, but probably won't.  Yes, summer is the time for hot weather.  That has been the case since Noah got off the Ark, about 2347 B.C.  Hot weather is not a crisis.  Hot weather is not a reason to stop burning hydrocarbons.  Hot weather is not a reason to vote for socialists.  [#2] How does the Washington Post or the National Weather Service know, with any certainty at all, what the weather will be like a month from now?  There is so much chaos in the atmosphere, and so many competing forces at work, that nobody can predict the path of a hurricane more than two or three days in advance, and nobody can predict the local weather two weeks from now.  Chance are it'll be hot, but there is still plenty of wiggle room.

Don't Believe Your Lying Eyes!  Here is another way to tell that Democrats are panicking:  They feel obliged to deal, somehow, with the fact that Joe Biden is senile.  The Washington Post headlines:  "How Republicans used misleading videos to attack Biden in a 24-hour period."  ["]President Biden, who at 81 is a couple of decades younger than many of the veterans he honored during Thursday's D-Day commemoration in Normandy...["]  Well then, he is practically youthful! [...] But the Post says nothing about Biden's Juneteenth brain freeze, his multiple incidents of falling down, his frequent descents into incoherence, his need to be led around to show him where to stand, his inability to read a teleprompter, and so on.  Many dozens of episodes of obvious senility have been preserved on video, and many millions of Americans have seen them.

Fauci Testimony Forces The Washington Post To Debunk Its Own Fake News.  One of the most comical headlines that came out of Anthony Fauci's testimony before Congress on Monday, in which he confirmed that there was no scientific evidence for the six-foot social distancing rule, was this gem by Dan Diamond for The Washington Post:  "In the pandemic, we were told to keep six feet apart.  There's no science to support that."  Well, fancy that.  Fauci's stunning admission builds on closed-door testimony before the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus back in January, in which Fauci revealed that the six-foot rule — which underpinned the social distancing edicts — "sort of just appeared."  When multiple Republican members questioned Fauci on Monday about the origins of these social distancing guidelines, Fauci acknowledged that they had not been studied in trials and were insufficient to stop the spread of the virus through the air.

No men are above the law, except theirs.  [Scroll down]  The Jeff Bezos Washington Post (under new non-DEI management) said, "Congressional Republicans returned to Washington this week doubling down on their defense of former president Donald Trump after his conviction on 34 counts related to falsifying business records. [...]"  How dare Republicans hold Democrats accountable.  Of course, we all know nothing will come of this, but perhaps Republicans will lay the groundwork for criminal prosecutions by Ken Paxton or whomever becomes attorney general next year.  The real fear of Democrats is not the long arm of the law because they always get away with their felonies.  Republicans didn't even bother to hold hearings on Obama using the FBI to Watergate Trump.  What the Party Of Obama fears was buried in Paragraph 13 of the Bezos Post story:  ["]Trump has animated his loyal base of voters by painting himself as a martyr and repeatedly suggesting that if the Biden administration and judicial system were not coming after him, they would go after his supporters.  Congressional Republicans say that message has been effective, deeply resonating with constituents back home.["]

Wash Post Editorial Board follows orders of megalomaniac billionaires: 'Humans might need to re-engineer the climate'.  This is retro 1970s.  In the 1970s, they believed fossil fuels were creating aerosols blocking the sun, creating man-made global cooling.  So they came up with the same kind of geo-engineering solutions back then.  They wanted to put black soot on the Arctic to melt it.  There was one proposal was to use nuclear energy to loosen the Arctic ice caps because they thought they were growing too much.  John Holdren (Science Czar) in the Obama Administration supported geo-engineering, if you will, of the climate.  This is radical, risky, unproven, with unknown effects but they are doing it as a sort of lever over us.

Critical Bear Studies.  I am not a bear expert. [...] But I do know something about narrative building, and this story from the Washington Post is an excellent example of how one does it.  [Tweet]  The story purports to be about the new discoveries that scientists have made in their research on the California Grizzly Bear.  It is, in other words, a piece that is supposedly grounded in science, expanding our knowledge about a vaguely interesting subject.  It isn't a story about science, Grizzly Bears, or anything similar.  It is a thinly veiled essay about White Settler Colonialism and how bad it is.  Far be it from me to defend everything about how the West was won.  The expansion of European settlers into the West was as inevitable as it was occasionally brutal.  With only a few million Native Americans inhabiting two continents.  The Americas make up about 30% of the Earth's land surface and a larger percentage of the comfortably habitable zones.

The Washington Post, misleading down to the subheadlines.  Even the subheadlines are substandard at the Washington Post.  In "Gazans go hungry as aid groups step back" (04/04/24), the subheadline reads, "Israel's war has wrecked Hamas civilian rule, with no alternative in place."  The anti-Israel bias at the Post is as clear as the clearest day.  It is not "Israel's war."  To say so exposes the authors' animus against Israel, ignoring how this war started and who the perpetrators were.  To remind The Washington Post, on October 7, thousands of Hamas combatants followed by Gazan civilians stormed through the borders of Israel, murdering; mutilating civilians, including children and babies; and taking hundreds of hostages, including babies.  Nice sleight of hand, Washington Post, in redirecting to implicate Israel.  It is Hamas's war on Israel, no matter how many times the Post repeats its canard.  It begs one to ask, is the Post on the Hamas payroll?

The "Airman" Who Set Himself on Fire for Hamas was Antifa Ex-Cult Member.  If you had told the average person that an anarchist or an airman had set himself on fire to protest Israel's campaign against Islamic terrorists, you would get two very different reactions.  Unsurprisingly the media led with the data point most likely to produce a favorable reaction.  And Aaron Bushnell cynically played the same game, wearing (the wrong) uniform to his Hamas suicide attempt rather than the Antifa red in which he had been previously photographed.  The Washington Post gets around to admitting that Bushnell was an "anarchist".

The deliberate lies in the Washington Post.  The Washington Post report covers the deaths of 'journalists' in Gaza.  Using the list of names provided by 'the Committee to Protect Journalists' (CPJ), the Post describes the Gazan journalists as brave heroes who paid the ultimate price just for trying to tell the world the truth.  The article implied that not only was Israeli deliberately killing journalists, but that Israel also targeted some journalist's families to make sure there would be no witnesses.  In many ways the piece is typical of the junk that much of western media is producing; a transparent attempt to delegitimise Israel by twisting facts and removing context.  The end result is little more than a pro-Hamas propaganda item.  But sometimes, in the rush to demonise Israel, journalists try to be too clever — and in this case, the Washington Post article can be used to hang those that put it together.  We need just three pieces of evidence to do it.

Washington Post Blames Grocery Stores For High Prices To Cover For Biden In Election Year.  The Washington Post wants voters to believe that grocery stores, not President Joe Biden's inflationary policies, are to blame for Americans' continued concern about rising food prices.  For three years, the propaganda press joined the Biden administration in lying about the nation's sticker shock.  They claimed inflation, which hasn't dropped below zero percent since Biden took office, is "cooling," "falling," and lightening voters' financial loads.  It wasn't until 2024, when President Joe Biden's years-long poor performance started hurting his standing in national presidential polls, that corporate media started reporting on how perpetually high prices affect families at the grocery store.  "Inflation has fallen.  Why are groceries still so expensive?" Washington Post authors Jeff Stein and Abha Bhattarai wondered in a headline on Friday.

This Washington Post Opinion Piece is Rewriting the Recent History of Border Control.  This isn't the worst piece I've ever read on the border issue but it's not the best either.  The main failure is summed up in the headline: "Forget about securing the border.  It won't work." [...] It's true that there was a big surge of migrants in 2019, but it's also true that surge had subsided months before the pandemic.  Here's a graph showing the surge in 2019.  [Not shown here.]  As you can see, there's a sharp peak in May when the southwest border apprehensions hit 144,000 in a single month.  But the numbers declined every month after that and by September 2019 were back down to 52,000.  That decline continued.  At the start of FY20, i.e. in October 2019 apprehensions dropped to 35,000.  In November they dropped again to 33,000 and in December they were down to 32,000.  In other words, FY20 roughly followed the blue line in the graph above even before anyone had heard about the pandemic.  This is obviously not consistent with the claim that Trump's "draconian policies" didn't work.

Quit Thinking and Do What You Are Told!  Philip Bump, the much-reviled and much-admired Washington Post columnist (whether you love or hate him depends entirely on your partisan leanings), has some advice:  don't read anything or watch anything unless it comes from the MSM.  Trust the MSM because doing your research leads to believing things that aren't true.  You might wind up believing things like the lab leak theory, that jabs don't work, that kids aren't so "resilient" after all, and that the Hunter Biden laptop is real.  [Tweet]  Bump, a philosophy major whose career started out as being a designer at Adobe, now often writes about politics, climate change, polls, and everything under the sun.  Epidemiology and virology are in his wheelhouse, too.  How he became an expert on all these subjects is beyond me.

The Washington Post Is in Full-Scale Collapse.  Is The Washington Post in full-scale collapse?  A recent look at the numbers provides a fairly convincing answer to that question.  According to the report, not only is the Post losing $100 million a year, but it lost over half of its online engagement by the end of 2023.  The signs were already there by mid-year, and the worst has come to pass.  [Tweets]  Having a billionaire sugar daddy has helped mask some of the issues plaguing the Post, but the tide can only be held back so long.  To lose over 50 percent of its online viewership is catastrophic for an outlet with such high overhead costs.  Subscriber numbers have also nosedived throughout the Biden administration.

Now There's Proof!  Brad Raffensperger Lied to President Trump When He Told Him in Jan 2021 Phone Call There Was No Fraud in 2020 Election.  In late December 2020, President Trump made a call to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger asking him to look at some of the items that were uncovered by his auditor.  There was plenty of evidence for a competent auditor or any man of integrity to know that the election was uncertifiable.  Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger's office secretly recorded the phone call with President Trump, then lied about its contents later when they leaked it to the far-left Washington Post.  Raffensperger's office ran to the Washington Post and leaked a fraudulent transcript of the call.  After they were caught lying to the American public, The Washington Post outed Jordan Fuchs as their anonymous source for the garbage hit piece.

Not the Babylon Bee.  What exactly a "climate disease" is is a mystery until you realize this term was invented to make a snappy headline.  In non-headline speak, these are diseases that are spread by more frequent interactions between people and wild animals driven out of their natural environment due to climate change.  Or they are diseases we are to believe are made more common due to climate change.  Color me skeptical.  Malaria, Dengue fever, and other diseases have been with us for millennia, and new diseases have been springing up throughout human history.

Taylor Lorenz Whines About Missing Christmas, Blames the Unmasked.  When it comes to the COVID-19 hysteria, it appears most people have moved on.  But others can't seem to let the pandemic go.  Washington Post media activist Taylor Lorenz is one of the latter.  Since it became clear that the coronavirus was no longer a threat, she has been insisting that the rest of the nation should still go through mask and vaccine mandates and take precautions to keep people like her safe.

Farhi — A Flicker of Light in the Post's Darkness.  We get the largely unreadable Washington Post because my husband must have a hard-copy paper with a sports section to read with his morning coffee.  To say its reporting stinks is to overpraise it.  Still, Saturday morning I saw the first glimmer of actual reporting, relegated as it was, nevertheless, to the ever-lefty fluff of the Style Section:  "News from the frontline of culture," per the Post's website.  The article is not on the Post website, and I had to go to sfgate to find it available online.  It seems to me the Post has done what it could to bury it.  Here's why — it exposes the rot in journalism today. [...] It's hard to believe such journalistic malpractice is not deliberate — an effort to appeal to the leftists in the President's party to pressure Israel to bow to the thugs of Hamas with whom their obvious sympathies lie.

WaPo claims Israel detaining Gazan civilians for no reason at all.  In "Israel is detaining civilians in Gaza.  Many have disappeared, families say" (12/11/23), the Gazans interviewed by the Post claimed that Israel detained their loved ones for essentially no reason at all.  Israel is fighting the hardest type of battle — urban warfare.  This grueling war becomes more arduous when one takes into account that Hamas fights from tunnels, uses civilians as human shields, and blends into Gaza dressed as civilians.  The heart-wrenching interviews are presented without any additional information the reader needs to know to fully understand this complex situation.  Gaza is run by the totalitarian regime Hamas — a recognized terrorist organization.  Any official reports, news, and interviews from Gaza must be considered favorable to Hamas and consistent with its extremist message.  Any Gazan contradicting Hamas's messaging does so with extreme risk to his own life, putting into question the motivations of any news that emanates from the regime territory.  And putting out propaganda is part of Hamas's war effort.  That's how totalitarian regimes work.  The Post omits this repugnant reality and did not corroborate the interviews it published.

Front-page anti-Israel animus at The Washington Post.  It was telling, and not unexpected, to see the front-page, above-the-fold placement of the Washington Post article "Young Palestinians describe harsh treatment in Israeli jails" (12/04/23) describing alleged Israeli mistreatment of Palestinian prisoners.  With the origin of the recent Israeli/Palestinian war being the broken ceasefire and subsequent barbaric massacre by Hamas of 1,200 innocent Israeli civilians from infants to the aged, along with the taking of 240 hostages, also from infants to the aged, it wasn't surprising to see The Washington Post have an article sympathetic to the initiators of the massacre — the Hamas-led Palestinians.  With the apparent end of what amounted to an exchange of innocent Israeli hostages with Palestinian criminals, the Post's interest was to highlight alleged trauma that the Palestinian prisoners received rather than the Israeli hostages stolen from their homes and families.  It is mind-blowing how the Washington Post can attempt to build a case critical of Israel for claims of, for example, occasional solitary confinement compared to Hamas gang-raping women, mutilation and dismemberment, and wholesale murder of Jewish civilians.  Hamas cut off the fingers and limbs of children in front of their parents, murdered parents in front of their children, gouged eyes out.  Does the Post really see an equivalence?

Subtle Like a Brick Through a Window - CIA Outlet Approves Donald Trump Assassination.  I have stayed away from this subject for eight years; however, everyone in/around U.S. politics knows the Washington Post, owned by Big Tech Amazon, is effectively the PR firm of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).  No one inside the DC beltway does not understand this basic truth.  Therefore, when the husband of State Dept official Victoria Nuland, a man named Robert Kagan, writes an op-ed in the CIA newsletter, effectively calling for President Trump to receive the Julius Caesar treatment, the non-subtle message is for the CIA to repeat their Kennedy performance and kill President Trump.  As alarming as this acceptance might sound, there are no intellectually honest people who would deny it.

Washington Post Shrinks by 240 More Staffers.  The failing, far-left Washington Post has just cut 120 jobs through buyouts and promised layoffs will commence if 120 more liars, I mean staffers, do not accept buyouts.  In a memo to liars, I mean staffers, Washington Post CEO Patty Stonesifer said, "We want everyone to understand that we need 240 acceptances to help restore The Post's financial health.  We have made the decision," she added, "that if we fall short of this goal, to implement involuntary layoffs."  "The layoffs," she warned, would offer "significantly less generous benefits than the voluntary package."

WaPo reporter hasn't a clue why it's so hard to get an Uber in DC.  There's little doubt that members of elite media live in an entitled bubble of their own choosing, opting to see the world through a tainted lens that in many cases conveniently favors the Democratic Party, but every so often they feel compelled to remind us anyway.  Take Washington Post senior national political correspondent Ashley Parker, for example.  The "reporter" took to social media to marvel over why it's so hard to get an Uber in crime-ridden Washington, D.C. [...] Of course, if Parker put some of her journalistic skills to work it wouldn't take long to stumble across a big clue to her conundrum.

The Washington Post's Paul Farhi Shows Why 'Professional' Journalism Can't Be Salvaged.  If The Washington Post were doing journalism instead of propaganda, its reporter who covers the news media might be focused nonstop on the fact that trust in the media is extremely low.  But Paul Farhi thinks there are more important problems.  Namely, he's worried that some unwashed masses might be practicing their First Amendment right to do journalism without a license.  "Someone invented the phrase 'citizen journalism' a few years ago to describe amateurs doing the work of pros.  Yes, it occasionally works, but probably no more often than 'citizen cop,' 'citizen attorney' or 'citizen soldier,'" he wrote on social media.

WaPo Reporter Who Questions Validity of Hunter's Laptop Was Recently Awarded for Using It As a Resource.  It can be said there are degrees of hackery when it comes to the journalism industry.  The standard Level 1 example is basic bias and partisanship in the reporting.  Level 2 can be said to have a more activist role, avoiding particular details or working hard to slant undeniable evidence.  This type is seen frequently at Politifact, to give an example.  The lowest has been Level 3, where a journalist delivers information they know to be incorrect but forges ahead with their agenda as that is far more important than the actual facts.  (This has been on display in rising numbers during the Israeli-Hamas conflict.)  However, at the Washington Post, we have White House reporter Matt Viser seeking to blaze new trails by delving deeper into the hack-mire and creating an even worse example.  More than just knowing the facts differ, he has intimate knowledge that his claim is completely fabricated.  Not only has he worked on the particular details professionally, he has been celebrated publicly for doing so, making his latest comment all the more asinine and laughable.

Washington Post Stands by Totally Debunked Atrocity.  What's a fake news outlet like the Washington Post supposed to do when they get busted for sticking with a horrific headline about a deadly airstrike that never happened, almost a full day after it was debunked?  A decent paper would retract the story and apologize.  I've done just that a number of times over the two decades I've been writing as VodkaPundit.  It's embarrassing, [...] but it has to be done.  But the Washington Post, as I'm sure readers here already know, is not a decent paper.  In fact, readers everywhere must know it because the money-losing progressive propaganda outlet just announced layoffs of another 240 employees.

Washington Post omits that Americans were slaughtered by Hamas.  When the Washington Post prints the sub headline, "9 U.S. citizens killed in conflict," and in the first sentence of the article says, "Nine U.S. citizens have been killed in the fighting between Hamas and Israel," doesn't the Post find it prudent and newsworthy to say which side killed them?  (I saw the piece in an item titled "Israel orders siege of Gaza Strip" dated Oct. 9, 2023, which seems to have been updated).  The Washington Post must correct this failure to identify the perpetrator.  It was clearly Hamas that perpetrated this cold-blooded murder of Americans, along with the murder of hundreds of other civilians, while taking grandmothers over 80 and infants as young as 9 months-old as hostages.  In the largest, most murderous part of the attack, Hamas terrorists massacred nearly everyone in the first and second rows at a musical concert for peace!  And they slaughtered many more.

Cast Down from Media Olympus.  The New York Times and the Washington Post have long been considered America's journalistic icons, ably representing the professionalism and integrity of their calling, and deserving their places on the Olympic media peak. [...] But The Post and The Times have changed, and one can only argue about when the process of their degradation began.  Historically, both papers have represented the Democrats and the left, causing much Republican criticism.  As examples, Republicans during Reagan's day called them "Pravda on the Hudson" and "Pravda on the Potomac," respectively, but this name-calling was mostly a humorous jab.  Things changed dramatically after Donald Trump announced his first White House bid in the 2016 election.  Journalistic integrity and responsible reporting were thrown into the toilet and replaced by overwhelmingly fake news and stories.  Trump must be defeated, and all means were justified in achieving that goal, including Hillary Clinton's grotesque "Russiagate" campaign to depict Trump as Vladimir Putin's stooge.

The deep state is through with Joe Biden.  When WaPo's David Ignatius declares the man he did so much to install in the Oval Office should not seek re-election, it means something.  Actually, it means a lot.  Ignatius is a despicable excuse for a "journalist."  As I stated here, Ignatius was a primary mouthpiece for deep state actors peddling the Russiagate conspiracy.  Any journalist with a modicum of integrity and self-respect — given what everyone should know now, and anyone with any intellectual curiosity should have suspected even then — would have outed the sources that fed him such bogus and blatantly false information.  Alas, there have been no "mea culpas" from Mr. Ignatius or any outing of his deep state sources.  Ignatius wasn't an unwitting dupe; he was an active participant in the deep state coup to overthrow a democratically elected president.  If this isn't the definition of sedition, I can't imagine what would be.  The logical conclusion that Ignatius is no more than a mouthpiece for the CIA is hard to escape.  This is what makes his call for Biden to bow out now so significant.

Rewriting history... it works more often than you think.  It's maddening, but true.  If there is a choice between confronting a difficult truth and believing an obvious lie many people will choose the latter. [...] Karine Jean-Pierre will look the Washington Press Corps in the eyes and lie with a straight face nearly every day, and they dutifully report what she says as if it is plausible. [...] Our MSM pulls this same sort of [stuff] all the time on a range of issues.  How many clips of reporters denying that there is a shred of evidence that Joe Biden helped his son engage in influence peddling?  The Washington Post's Philip Bump beclowned himself by claiming (again) that there is zero evidence that Joe Biden had anything to do with Hunter's business, and when pressed left a podcast in a huff. [...] Rest assured, though, that Bump will continue pushing the lie, and vast numbers of people will continue to believe it because the alternative is confronting a hard truth.  How many TV anchors have repeated the same lie that there is no evidence that Biden was deeply involved in his son's business?  [Tweet with video clip]  It's not just Bump.  Almost every MSM reporter and commentator has had a changing story about Joe Biden and Hunter for years now; the only consistent part of that story is that Joe is totally innocent and ignorant about Hunter's antics.

Lede with a lie.  The Washington Post isn't fit to be fish wrapper.  They are a disgrace.  A total, complete, and pathetic disgrace.  If and when Democracy Dies in Darkness, the Post will be the ones who broke all the light bulbs and shut down the power plants that provided the energy to keep the country lit, cooled, and properly functioning as a modern free market liberal democracy.  I was shocked to see this utter tripe being pushed out by the Post last night, in which the lede claims that "extreme heat kills more people in the United States than any other weather hazard." [...] This claim is complete tripe, and for proof you need not look any further than a story that was in The Washington Post this [past] February.  February 16th, in fact.  There has never been any dispute — scientifically — about whether heat or cold is the larger danger to human existence.  In all but the most extreme cases deaths caused by excessive heat are actually caused by something like dehydration.  The simple expedient of drinking more water would slash the danger dramatically.

Washington Post quietly 'updates' Hunter Biden laptop story after Devon Archer testimony.  The Washington Post's fact-checking department has yet again quietly updated — rather than corrected — its most-read story, which contained glaring errors about first son Hunter Biden's laptop and an infamous dinner involving then-Vice President Joe Biden and Burisma executive Vadym Pozharskyi.  Glenn Kessler, the paper's chief fact-checker, has made six updates and authored an entirely new article about The Post's bombshell reports in October 2020 and May 2021 that revealed Hunter Biden introduced his father to Pozharskyi at Café Milano in Georgetown months after joining the natural gas firm's board.  The initial fact check relied on statements from Andrew Bates — then a spokesman for the Biden campaign and now deputy White House press secretary — and Michael Carpenter, a former Biden foreign policy adviser and now a permanent US representative to the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE).

Washington Post tries to do a hit job on a non-woke bank that loaned to Trump.  President Trump has had a lot of ups and downs in his real estate career, which means his relations with banks and credit can be pretty dicey.  The matter was made worse for him in the wake of the January 6 protests, where wokester banks outright cut him off.  His Trump Organization financial operation however did find a bank that would loan to his organization, a relatively small bank in San Diego called Axos Bank. and that set the Washington Post scrambling to look for some seedy Biden-style corruption.  They found nothing.  They must have spent some time on this, however, because they ran a story, and had to satisfy themselves with innuendo that maybe something could be wrong.

Jen Rubin spews tripe about Florida, forcing the WaPo to issue an embarrassing correction.  Jennifer Rubin wrote a column in the Washington Post, absurdly claiming that Florida was so badly run and so "cruel" its residents were fleeing, basing her entire article on this errant premise, and forcing the Washington Post to issue an embarrassing correction. [...] The statistic she cited came from some dingbat at Business Insider who mixed up the inbound numbers of Florida residents with the outbound numbers of Florida residents — a pretty elementary error.  Business Insider had to correct itself the following day.

Buffoon alert: WaPo staffer announces solutions for national debt crisis.  For months, the economic geniuses and budget experts at The Washington Post have worked tirelessly to come up with ways to handle our $32 trillion debt; just look at this excerpt from an article out yesterday and written by assistant editor Drew Goins:  ["]Over the past few months, the Editorial Board has been doing what lawmakers haven't:  pulling together a plan to stabilize the national debt.["]  Let's take a look at the proposals, starting with Social Security:  ["]What the board proposes is a broadening of the amount of income the Social Security tax is levied on; a gradual increase of the full retirement age to keep up with rising life expectancy; and a decrease in how much very-high-income households receive in benefits ... while increasing what low-income homes get.["]  They want to levy higher taxes against private employees and employers (maybe even the retirees?) to cover an unpayable debt, but fail to suggest that the federal employees receiving the generous pensions and healthcare benefits pay more to support the system that rewards them the most.  They suggested cutting from the top, but didn't think to cap federal pensions.

Are the media turning against Joe Biden?  It's nearly impossible to get as much favorable press coverage as President Biden received in the first two years of his administration.  Compare him to former President Trump, for example.  The Washington Post kept a running total of all the "false or misleading claims" Trump made, no matter how insignificant or irrelevant they happened to be.  By combing through every word the man uttered about just about anything, the Post managed to assemble "30,573 false or misleading claims" he made while in office.  What was the quality of these falsehoods?  Here are a few hints.  One example, counted 250 times by the Post's editors, was:  "We rebuilt the United States military." Another, counted nearly 500 times in the Post tally, was a typical presidential boast: "We also built the greatest economy in the history of the world."  Perhaps it was a silly thing for Trump to say — given even a slightly charitable interpretation, this statement had been true at every point since mid-2010.  But it also remained true until 2021, when the pandemic hit.

Washington Post bemoans how July 4th 'most polluted day of the year' because of fireworks.  Climate reporters for the Washington Post lectured how fireworks from 4th of July celebrations will exacerbate air pollution caused by recent wildfires.  As millions of Americans prepare to celebrate the nation's founding with a traditional fireworks display, climate reporters Kasha Patel and Kate Selig warned that these displays spread harmful pollutants.  The piece went as far as to refer to the holiday as "the most polluted day of the year."  "It may come as a surprise, but the federal holiday stands out as the most polluted day of the year in many locations across the nation, according to air quality data.  Fireworks — the staple of Independence Day celebrations — light up the sky but also launch harmful pollutants.  In some cases, the pollution levels from the pyrotechnics are similar to severe wildfire smoke," the article read.

The Editor says...
Socialist Democrats make a lot of rash pronouncements and hope you won't analyze what they've said.  July 4th is a federal holiday, and hardly anybody commutes to their offices, so it's probably one of the least polluted days of the year.  But if you're gonna point fingers, the Canadian wildfires, which all started at the same time and were probably set by eco-terrorists, don't help the air quality much.  But the combustion of thousands of trees can hardly be compared to the smoke from a few firecrackers.  Sometimes the presence of smoke in the air is a very minor concern, outweighed by other matters at hand.

WaPo columnist lies through her teeth and says Joe Biden has 'underrated deal-making prowess'.  For months, Joe Biden said he absolutely would not negotiate.  His spokespuppets repeatedly said there would be no negotiations. [...] With all the government's endless spending, we always reach the next "debt ceiling" — Biden knew this was coming, and he essentially did nothing.  When he finally decided to "negotiate" at the very last second, he left town in the middle of the back-and-forth!  But now, according to Jennifer Rubin of The Washington Post, the 100-page deal between Biden and Kevin McCarthy displays Biden's superior negotiating skills.

Did WaPo reporters conspire with extremists to attack National Gallery of Art?  And if they did, will anyone from the Washington Post face charges over it?  Readers might remember this stunt from a month ago at the National Gallery of Art, in which climate-change protesters vandalized a display of an Edgar Degas sculpture.  Fortunately, the Washington Post just happened to have a reporter and a photographer on scene that day to capture the crime and its aftermath: [...] A grand jury returned an indictment against Smith and Martin yesterday, charging the pair with felonies for an injury to a National Gallery of Art property (40 US 6303, 6307) and conspiracy to commit an offense against the United States (18 USC 371).  Both could cost the two defendants up to five years in prison and $250,000 per count, although they're likely to get shorter sentences than that if they have no prior convictions.  But let's get back to the WaPo's good fortune in having a reporting team on scene when the attack occurred.  Was that just a coincidence?  Not according to the grand jury: [...]

Trump's Truth Social Media Firm Files $3.78 Billion Defamation Lawsuit Against The Washington Post.  Trump Media and Technology Group (TMTG), the parent company of the Truth Social platform, has taken legal action against The Washington Post, filing a defamation lawsuit seeking a staggering $3.78 billion in damages.  The case was filed late Saturday night in Sarasota County, Florida, which alleges that far-left WaPo published false and defamatory statements about the Truth Social platform, its CEO, Devin Nunes, and former President Trump, damaging its reputation and causing significant financial harm.

Democrats Are The Brainless Party.  After Fetterman's disastrous performance at the Banking Committee hearing, the Washington Post's Jeff Stein sent a tweet supposedly quoting Fetterman as saying "Shouldn't you have a working requirement after we bail out your bank?  Republicans seem to be more preoccupied with SNAP requirements for hungry people than protecting taxpayers that have to bail out these banks."  Here's what Fetterman actually said: "The Republicans want to give a work requirement for SNAP.  You know, for a uh, uh, uh, a hungry family has to have these, this kind of penalties, or these some kinds of word — working uh, require — Shouldn't you have a working requirement, after we sail your bank, billions of your bank?  Because you seem we were preoccupied, uh when, then SNAP requirements for works, for hungry people, but not about protecting the tax, the tax papers, you know, that will bail them out of whatever does about a bank to crash it."  When confronted, Stein deleted his tweet and then claimed he just reprinted what Fetterman's office sent him.  A reporter who did this on behalf of a Republican senator would be tossed on the street.  Stein's job, we're certain, is quite secure.

Washington Post Stands By Their Fraudulent Trump-Russia Collusion Reporting.  In July 2020 documents were released by the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding the Russia collusion hoax.  The second set of documents exposed the outlandish New York Times story that the Trump team had "repeated contacts with senior Russian intelligence officials."  The declassified documents reveal The New York Times reporting was transparently dishonest and attempted to fuel the Russiagate narrative in its early stages.  In May 2022, the country learned that it was Hillary Clinton's campaign that was behind the entire Trump-Russia collusion hoax.  We know this because her former campaign manager Robbie Mook said so under oath during the Sussman trial.

Washington Post Editors Deny Border Surge.  The editors of Jeff Bezos' Washington Post are claiming the White House has gotten southern migration under control, with a wide front-page headline saying "At the border, a reset but no surge."  The May 13, editor-placed, five-column headline hides the reality of President Joe Biden's surge of 83,000 migrants in one week — and it also distracts readers from Biden's radical decision to ignore Congress while his deputies extract millions of consumers, renters, and workers from poor foreign countries for resettlement in Americans' neighborhoods, schools, and workplaces.

Washington Post Rushes to Call Texas Mall Shooter a White Supremacist, Shoots Itself in the Foot.  As the news flashed about the horrific shooting that took place in Allen, Texas on Saturday, the Washington Post rushed out an early report on the incident.  Although they had sketchy details regarding the shooter and what took place, one thing the paper was confident in reporting:  the likelihood of the shooter being a white supremacist.  There appear to be too many things aligned to resist running forward with a narrative on this event:  an AR-15 is said to have been used, the shooting took place in Texas, and the gun control messaging was all set to go.  Finding out the killer was possibly also from a hate group would be just the icing the paper needed on this four-layer outrage dessert.

Rather Than Smearing Justices, Democrats Should Be Asking Them For Ethics Lessons.  The concerted effort by the media and Democrats to delegitimize the Supreme Court is the most consequential attack on our institutions in memory.  Make no mistake.  Today's "Supreme Court Ethics Reform" hearing is meant to discredit the high court and slander justices with innuendo.  Nothing else.  Democrats are angry because the court happens to occasionally uphold basic constitutional principles of American governance.  Democrats are nervous that originalist justices are going to weaken the administrative state or hand power back to localities or protect religious liberty or gun rights.  The recent hit pieces on Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch were shoddy and transparently partisan.  They did not uncover any conflict of interest nor corruption.  They exist to give politicians fodder and hackish outlets like The Washington Post the freedom to contend that the Senate is "consider[ing] strengthening ethics rules for the Supreme Court in response to a cascade of revelations about unreported lavish travel and real estate deals."  Most Post readers will, no doubt, be unaware that there has been no "unreported" lavish travel or real estate deals.

Washington Post covers up the role of bureaucrats in making the pandemic worse.  In The Daily 202: The pandemic made the loneliness crisis worse, Washington Post writer Oliver Knox ("with research by Caroline Anders") claims that the pandemic caused loneliness to worsen.  But loneliness was not caused by the pandemic.  It was caused by dictatorial edicts from government officials.  No matter how many lies or evasions Fauci and CDC made up, most of the media went along.  People were told they would kill people if they gathered together.  Churches were closed and fined if they refused to comply with the bureaucrats' edicts.  The CDC, unions, and other Democrats colluded to keep kids out of schools and sports.  If Republicans opened schools, the media and other Democrats said they were intentionally killing people.  How many federal workers and others are still working remotely?  It surely isn't because of COVID.  Why did it take so long for Biden to lift the vaccine mandate?  It surely isn't because of science.  Now, Fauci, Weingarten and others are trying to rewrite history and say they didn't want things closed.

Government-Endorsed Corporate Media Gives Award to Dishonest WaPo Hack for "Capturing the Spirit of Joe Biden".  Last night the government-endorsed corporate media gave an award to WaPo hack Matt Viser for his dishonest portrayals of Joe Biden.  Matt Viser was awarded for his reporting on Joe Biden that did not include ONE MENTION of his obvious dementia, his myriads of known criminal actions and canoodling with dictators, lying about his son's laptop to the American public during a major election, disowning his grand-child, and his serial groping of women and children.  It takes some real talent to be THAT dishonest!

Washington Post Is Blatantly Biased In Naming 'Worst Federal Judge'.  Matthew Kacsmaryk — sole federal judge in the Amarillo division of the Northern District of Texas and recently responsible for invalidating the Food and Drug Administration's 23-year-old approval of the abortion drug mifepristone — is "the worst federal judge in America," recently declared Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus, who covers the Supreme Court.  Kacsmaryk is worthy of the moniker, opines Marcus, "not simply for the poor quality of his judicial reasoning," but for "the loaded content of his rhetoric," which is not impartial, but that of a "zealot."  Marcus' charge is rhetorical bombast at its worst, but on what does she base it?  Her own ideological zealotry and blatant bias, ironically enough.

Four Pinocchios for Glenn Kessler.  Following a spate of scandals in the 1980s typified by the Washington Post's Janet Cooke inventing an eight-year-old heroin addict and winning a Pulitzer for her tear-jerking profile of this nonexistent person, newspapers created their own in-house hall monitors in the form of ombudsman and public editors who responded in print to reader complaints about journalistic mistakes.  Their presence in a newspaper's pages was intended to encourage skeptical readers to believe they could trust the institutions that published them.  After all, who could doubt the integrity of media organizations willing to subject themselves to harsh scrutiny by one of their own employees?  Few of these monitors remain today, the victims of budget cuts and a changing media landscape.

Why No One Should Ever Listen to Max Boot.  Changing one's views in politics is hardly a cause for dismissal.  People do get "older and wiser."  People do have enough sense — despite spitting and fuming on TV as Boot often does — to recognize when the hammer isn't working anymore.  We often congratulate those who change, but when someone who was so wrong, for so long, changes so as to remain a relevant fixture, the change comes off as hollow and self-motivated.  Not to mention describing his eureka moment of change also coming with deliberate lies and misrepresentations.

Shock! WaPo lied about Elon Musk.  I know, I know.  It's not a shock.  If the Washington Post is lying it must be a day ending in -day.  The latest example is a report that I immediately knew was false but had no evidence to back that judgment up so I let it pass.  It was a claim that went around Twitter and then into the MSM that Elon Musk had a fit at Twitter headquarters and forced engineers to rewrite the algorithm to ensure his tweets always were the first users could see.  It was a ridiculous claim, but in today's hyper-partisan environment, it spread like wildfire.  Or rather, like any MSM-backed misinformation.  [Tweet]  The Washington Post devoted prime real estate and TWO reporters to the story, clearly investing significant resources to spread the rumor.  The Jeff Bezos-owned propaganda outlet — quite the irony there — couldn't let the opportunity to dunk on Musk escape, even if they had to ignore facts.  With two reporters you think they could bother to actually investigate the claim.  But no.  That would be reporting, not spreading a convenient narrative.

Now the WaPo 'factchecker' is rationalizing the letter from 51 lying intelligence officials.  The Republicans in the House are having an investigation into the collusion of the media, Justice Department, and Intelligence officials as they censored the true story of the Biden family corruption right before the 2020 election.  This was pure election interference to mislead the public.  Now, Glenn Kessler, the designated fact checker at the WaPo, is claiming that the intelligence officials who lied about Russian disinformation were very careful in their wording of the letter but the media either misinterpreted or misused the letter.  That is a load of garbage.

WaPo [is] Humiliated After [an] Apparent Hatchet Job on [a] Hispanic GOP Rep [ia] Exposed for World to See.  The Washington Post is being accused of racism by a Hispanic lawmaker from Florida.  Republican Rep. Anna Paulina Luna of Florida said its recent profile on her was riddled with errors, according to Fox News.  "It's awful how [The Washington Post] treat[s] minorities.  And the fact is, is that their undertone of their article was incredibly racist.  They tried to undercut my Hispanic heritage.  They even spoke to my mother and did report a lot of what she was posting.  So, The Washington Post is compost, and they should do better," she said during a Friday appearance on the Fox News show "Jesse Watters Primetime."

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna Blasts Fake News Media for False Reporting — Threatens Legal Action.  Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) said Friday that the Washington Post wrote a smear job on her with several mischaracterizations, and baseless and inaccurate information, including the claim that she only embraced her Hispanic background in order to seek office.  This report was then shared by mainstream media.  "As I've said before, and as the Washington Post has clearly showcased, anyone who is a conservative minority is a threat to Leftist control," Luna told Fox News Digital.  "They can try to discredit me, but unfortunately for them the facts completely blow their story out of the water."  The far-left WaPo published a story on Friday attacking her with the headline "The making of Anna Paulina Luna."

The Takedown of Anna Paulina Luna Is Not Going as Planned.  Since the legacy media is running out of fodder on NY Rep. George Santos, The Washington Post decided it needed to set its investigative sites on the freshman representative from Florida, Anna Paulina Luna.  Luna has been making her mark among the newly-minted GOP House.  Luna was one of the gang of 20 who held House Speaker McCarthy's feet to the fire on the Rules package in order for him to secure her vote for his speakership.  Luna is causing her Democrat colleagues to clutch their pearls over her 2A stance and asserting her right to carry her firearm within the meeting chambers.  Luna publicly joined Reps.  Andrew Clyde and George Santos in wearing an AR-15 lapel pin to show her support of 2A rights, and she is cutting a swath on the House Oversight Committee with her targeted grilling of those testifying on the floor.  The WaPo hit piece is the usual drivel of anonymous sources, interviews with associates that are supposedly dear friends, distant cousins, and hair-splitting hyperbole to make Luna's story and background as questionable as possible.

The real state of the union.  The Washington Post reported, "Americans not feeling impact of Biden agenda, Post-ABC poll finds."  Of course, they are feeling the impact of his agenda.  Inflation remains at 1970s levels, we humiliated ourselves by surrendering Afghanistan, and we are depleting our military to protect Ukraine's border while ignoring our own.  According to the story, "62% of Americans think Biden has accomplished not very much or little or nothing during his presidency, while 36% say he has accomplished a great deal or a good amount."  What WaPo — a house organ for the deep state — measured was the popularity of what he has accomplished.  Not much of it is good.  ABC's report on the very same poll began, "Four in 10 Americans say they've gotten worse off financially since Joe Biden became president, the most in ABC News/Washington Post polls dating back 37 years."  That is quite an accomplishment.  He set a record by ruining the finances of 41% of Americans.

It is no wonder the media has lost the trust of the people.  Most journalists have been pushing an agenda for a long time instead of reporting objectively or based on facts.  This includes news and opinion journalists.  Now, we see a Washington Post article saying that the media can regain the trust of the people even if they intentionally are not objective.  But if the media are pushing ideas on social policies and political activity, they are propagandists, not journalists.  They are seeking to indoctrinate instead of educate their readers.

Washington Post editorial board: Migrants are gaming the asylum system.  In this case the news isn't the message it's the messenger.  You don't hear a leading newspaper state the obvious about the immigration crisis every day, certainly not like this. [...] I could fault the Post for a few things here.  First, the system isn't "evolving" into this, it has already evolved.  It started evolving years ago during the Trump administration and for the past two years it has simply been growing at a tremendous rate as more and more people looking for a better life realize the back door of a bogus asylum claim is always open.  But why criticize when there's so much here that doesn't usually wind up in a paper like the [P]ost, i.e. the fact that this parallel system is a magnet drawing people in and the fact that people with weak cases get what they want regardless of the procedural outcome because no one ever makes them leave.  Maybe if this sort of information was included in every story on this topic, Americans would begin to understand what is happening and why.

To The Left, Racism Is Like The Matrix.  On Monday, the Washington Post sent an update to its email subscribers with the subject line: "The police officers charged with the murder of Tyre Nichols are black.  Does it matter?"  The short answer is:  Yes, but only to race hustlers on the left.  Which is why the Post enlisted three reporters who spent nearly 1,400 words twisting themselves into pretzels to explain how black police officers beating a black man to death was further proof of "systemic racism."

Most reporters are shills for Democrats and the latest string of news proves it.  [Scroll down]  Then we get the entire editorial board at the WaPo saying how great White House medical advisor, and consumate health care bureaucrat.  Anthony Fauci has been. [...] They clearly don't care how much he got wrong.  First, he said COVID wouldn't be a problem in the U.S.  Then he said, don't wear masks before he told us we must wear masks.  The CDC and Fauci also lied that the virus would easily spread off surfaces, made up the six foot social distancing standards based on nothing and forced millions to waste millions on worthless plexiglass barriers.  Fauci and others also discouraged an investigation of the Wuhan lab, calling it a disproven conspiracy.  That was an intentional lie.  The damage to the economy and children based on dictatorial edicts was massive.  How many deaths were caused because of suicide or failure to get screenings because of the dictatorial edicts?  Why would the WaPo or anyone else tout Fauci's success when he got so much wrong, caused so much damage, and can't seem to recall much of what he did?

Washington Post discovers that there was slavery in the US.  The Washington Post is apparently in the midst of a year-long investigation into the relationship between the US Congress and slavery.  Who knew?  I certainly didn't, because I generally don't look to newspapers to explain American history to me.  The last time one tried to do so we got the 1619 Project, which is reviled by everybody but Robin DiAngelo and Ibram X Kendi.  As for historians, everybody from Left to Right thinks the project was bunk.  The Washington Post, being less ambitious than the NYT, is giving us a dime-store version of the 1619 Project which relies more on innuendo than outright falsehoods to slander America's Founding.  The first piece in the project revealed that there were slaveholders in Congress, breaking news that had been suppressed for centuries.

Washington Post Scrubs Inaccurate 'Conservative' Label of Matt Taibbi, Bari Weiss From Article After Backlash.  The Washington Post quietly scrubbed the word "conservative" from its description of the center-left reporters behind the viral "Twitter Files" after being called out for the inaccurate wording.  Twitter CEO Elon Musk gave independent journalists Matt Taibbi and Bari Weiss access to Twitter's internal documents, allowing them to expose the company's rationale for shadow banning conservative users, censoring the Hunter Biden laptop story and deplatforming of former President Trump.  Both of Taibbi and Weiss are well-known left of center journalists, as Fox News noted.

Washington Post Joins List of News Companies in Economic Straits After Denying a Bad Economy.  On Thursday, close to 1,100 New York Times workers staged a strike, of sorts.  The effort appears rather neutered considering it was only a 24-hour walkout, and the desperation was evident as they attempted to get readers to also join in by not consuming any Times content for the day.  (Their position was further weakened as they realized the biggest challenge in this attempt was not concerning their work but in getting people to stop playing Wordle!)  This barely recognized quit-snit was possibly met with shrugs based on one of the core complaints from this block of journalist guild workers.  They have been bargaining for wages that "keep up with inflation," stipulating that they have been particularly impacted by this while working in New York.  This is rather grating to see, as the press has been actively trying to sell the general public on the notion that our economy is not as bad as it is perceived, done in order to shield Joe Biden from responsibility.

WaPo analysis: nobody should care that we covered up the Hunter Biden laptop.  The Washington Post has a retrospective analysis that gets them off the hook for covering up the news: it wouldn't have made a difference in the 2020 election anyway.  There's a new spin on things from a journalist.  Hey, let me assert the unknowable is true so I can explain why it was OK for me to lie to you to avoid what wouldn't have happened anyway.

The Washington Post's Reporting Can't Be Trusted.  After the highly politicized raid on President Trump's personal residence at Mar-a-Lago by the Biden Department of Justice, Fake News Media kicked into high gear to justify it.  Chief among the legacy media culprits is The Washington Post. [...] The Washington Post reports on the Mar-a-Lago raid bear the hallmarks of fake news.  The stories rely solely on anonymous sources.  The paper provides no facts whatsoever tending to show that the anonymous sources are well placed enough to know what they are talking about.  The claims made in the articles cannot be otherwise verified.  Essentially, the paper asks readers to trust its reporting about these sensitive matters.  But can The Post's reporting be trusted?  A review of a few of The Post's other anonymously sourced articles relating to President Trump confirms that the answer is no.

WaPo: hide the evidence.  Democracy Dies from Knowledge™.  Spread the Darkness™.  The Truth Hurts™.  Pick a slogan.  Philip Bump of the Washington Post argues that releasing the video from the Paul Pelosi break in/assault would only fuel conspiracy theories.  Best to stick to the official Narrative™ so that we plebs don't get any uppity ideas that we aren't being told the truth.  He actually, truly, 100% no kidding is arguing that the evidence should be hidden, as any great reporter would.  In other news, Bump argues that Jeffrey Epstein killed himself, there were no actual human trafficking victims in the crimes for which Ghislain Maxwell was convicted, and the tooth fairy really does leave money behind if you put your tooth under the pillow.

The Dope on Depape.  Paul Pelosi, the husband of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, was attacked by a man with a hammer at the couple's home in San Francisco early Friday morning.  CNN has strung a series of reports on the attack here.  CNN's first report of the assault was posted at 11:08 a.m. on October 28.  By 2:25 p.m.  Gavin Newsom had attributed the attack to "divisive and hateful rhetoric."  By 7:25 p.m. President Biden had observed that assaulter's query — "Where's Nancy?" — was the same one used during the Jan. 6 "insurrection" at the Capitol.  Defamation dies in darkness.  The Washington Post therefore assigned three reporters to the case.  By 7:00 a.m. on October 29 the Post had nailed it down:  "Attack on Nancy Pelosi's husband follows years of GOP demonizing her."  The subhead was equally unsubtle:  "A man with right-wing views who broke into the House speaker's home yelled 'Where is Nancy?' before assaulting Paul Pelosi with a hammer, police say."  The Post must have capitalized "Where is Nancy" to indicate it's part of the right-wing code.

Lying Liars Gonna Lie.  A favorite saying of mine, statistics never lie but liars use statistics. [...] In 2021 blacks committed around 335,000 violent crimes that we know of, and that is almost 7,000 more violent crimes than Whites even though there are 204 million Whites in America as of 2020 and only 41 million blacks.  As I have demonstrated before, it is reasonable to assume that a majority of unknown offenders are also black. [...] While Whites committed 36,716 rapes and blacks "only" 16,008 reported rapes in 2018, looking at the victim side tells us something interesting.  Whites are 60% of known rapists (11% are unknown) but White women are 74% of rape victims, while blacks are 26% of known rapists, double their representation of the population as a whole, but black women are only 18% of rape victims.  To put it another way, 8000 more White women were raped 2018 than White men commited rape and black men commit 5000 more rapes than there are black women raped.  Add in the gap of 3000 unknown rapists and it is quite possible that of the 16,000 rapes committed by black men in 2018, nearly half of them were rapes of White women.  Maybe that is another of those old stereotypes based in facts?  Like most violent crime, interracial rape is almost exclusively black on White, in fact White men raping black women is so rare that it doesn't even really register statistically.

US media do Somalians a disservice by blaming climate change for famine.  Ishaan Tharoor, a foreign affairs columnist at the Washington Post, didn't mince words about a looming famine in Somalia.  "Ordinary Somalis ... have contributed little to the emissions that are warming the planet.  But they are on the front lines of the catastrophic climatic events scientists believe will only grow more common in the years to come."  On cue, National Public Radio picked up the story, allowing the author to expound unchallenged on "the connection between the hunger crisis, the war in Ukraine and climate change."  If the media really want to "follow the science," however, they got cause and effect wrong.  Certainly, the Horn of Africa does face drought and famine in Somalia.  It may be a bit of an exaggeration to blame climate change, though, given the cyclical nature of drought in the Horn.  When scientists voice hypotheses, they seek to prove them by isolating variables to rule out any other explanation.  Here is the problem:  Suggesting emissions cause climate change, which in turn explains famine, may conform with journalists' politics — but not with science.

Lawsuit filed: RW Malone vs. WP Company, LLC.  Over the last year, I have been defamed, slandered and censored.  My words taken out of context and weaponized in attempts to discredit me.  A concerted effort was made to write me out of history and deny my intellectual and scientific contributions.  [One] of the most egregious offenders has been the Washington Post.

Exploding the Watergate Myth.  [Scroll down]  All the President's Men was a splendid work of American cinema — and it was about what we've all been told ever since was the most splendid chapter in American journalistic history, a textbook case of dogged footwork and moral integrity that lifted the [Washington] Post into the front rank of American newspapers, gave Woodstein (the Post's in-house nickname for Bob and Carl) an Olympian status that they still enjoy to this day, made journalists as a class more important and influential than ever, and ushered in a new era of aggressive and ambitious — yet far more respected — investigative reporting about politicians.  But what ever happened to that earthshaking revelation about covert operations by "the entire U.S. intelligence community"?  In the nearly half-century since Watergate, we've never heard another word about it.  Not from the Post, anyway.  There was always another big question about Watergate:  why would the Nixon White House have wanted to burglarize Democratic headquarters in the first place?

Mainstream media urging voters to ignore inflation, focus on imperiled democracy.  Recent surveys have consistently shown that runaway inflation is the most troubling issue to most Americans.  This has led many talking heads and media outlets to express deep concern that historically high gas prices and generally rampant inflation might lead to significant Democrat losses in the upcoming midterm elections.  The horror!  To help prevent this, Washington Post columnist Catherine Rampell, for example, informed her readers that it was a "wild fantasy" to believe that the GOP could lower gas prices.  Furthermore, in a Sunday opinion piece, she condescendingly warned voters to "think carefully about what they'll get if they cast their ballot based on gas prices."  By that she means evil Republicans who are pro-life and pro-Bill of Rights.  Rampell added, "The president does not have some super-secret special dial on his desk that can adjust gas prices, but many voters believe otherwise."  Yes, Catherine, I'm sure many voters think Biden has a "dial" on his desk that can adjust gas prices in real time.  (Not that he'd know how to use it if he did.)  In reality, most voters know that Biden killed the Keystone Pipeline on Day One, has rescinded or denied drilling leases, and has made it clear he is an implacable foe of the fossil fuel industry in every shape and form.  That is why gas prices have skyrocketed since he took office, and that is why voters are rightfully angry.

The Washington Post attempts to whitewash the murder plot against Justice Kavanaugh.  A few days back, the Washington Post carried an op-ed by Ruth Marcus regarding the gunman who was apprehended outside Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh's home.  The piece began well, condemning the assassination plot as 'horrifying and intolerable'.  It also demanded that there be adequate security for that the justices, their families, and staff. [...] The piece then pivots to the standard spinning, deceiving, and whataboutery that the WaPo is known for.  The piece urges its readers not to "assign blame or hijack the episode to reinforce preexisting conclusions" and that "deranged individuals do deranged things" which is true "at both ends of the political spectrum".  When the Democrats commit an egregious mistake, propagandists frequently attempt to dilute the impact by applying the 'both sides' argument.  The piece proceeds to indulge in a bit of monkey balancing, you can almost sense the effort here.

Taylor Lorenz, WaPo Blasted for Repeated Unacknowledged Errors in Reporting.  Taylor Lorenz, the establishment media journalist known for doxing teenagers and anonymous meme accounts and literally crying because of the ensuing backlash, is under fire for repeated errors in reporting which she refuses to acknowledge.  The Washington Post, which published Lorenz's shoddy reporting, is also under attack by Oculus VR founder Palmer Luckey for publishing and then deleting false claims about him.  According to Luckey, the Washington Post falsely claimed he funneled political contributions through "shell companies," only to later delete the allegation with no disclosure.

It takes someone in the tank, if not brain-dead, to call this a 'Goldilocks econony'.  Because of a decent jobs report and a lot of job openings, Catherine Rampell, a de facto Democrat campaign worker at the Washington Post posing as a journalist, believes we are close to a "Goldilocks economy" (not too hot, not too cold, as is said in the markets) when most of us know the economy is pretty [...] cold.  Rampell also says that the consumer is in great shape, but many economic statistics show that is not true. [...] Inflation is over 8%, a 40 year high, while after-tax earnings are going up around half that level.  For consumers, that's losing ground.  Crude oil is up over 200% from under $40 per barrel to around $120 today since the day Biden was elected.  That is what you get when one of the main Democrat policies is to destroy the fossil fuel industry.  They certainly don't care about the massive harm to the poor, middle class, and small businesses.  The retail gas price was around $2.20 when Biden was elected. and is around $5 today, up around 130%.  The inflation rate for the poor and middle class is clearly much higher than 8% when one of their major necessities is up 130% in 19 months.

Biden's 'Ministry of Truth' paused, Nina Jankowicz resigns; Wa-Po's Lorenz blames 'right-wing attacks'.  Denying any partisan motivations behind the rollout of the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) Disinformation Governance Board — while President Joe Biden and Democrats actively challenge the right to free speech — the dubiously nicknamed "Ministry of Truth" has been put on pause after expressed concern, leaving the door wide open for further ridicule.  The Washington Post entered a meta state of irony Tuesday when they reported that the board would be shutting down faster than CNN+.  In an article titled, "How the Biden administration let right-wing attacks derail its disinformation efforts," anti-doxing doxer and woebegone victim Taylor Lorenz attempted to pin the immense backlash as "coordinated online attacks."  As she has so expertly done for herself, Lorenz painted the would-be chair Nina Jankowicz as a hapless target caught in the crosshairs of right-wing hate as she hyped up the claims of DHS Secretary Mayorkas, who labeled Jankowicz as "eminently qualified."

Washington Post Op-Ed:  Ending Roe v. Wade 'About Protecting Whiteness'.  A Washington Post op-ed from Brian Boome claims the Supreme Court and the pro-life movement as a whole want to eliminate abortion to "protect whiteness."  Reflecting on the horrible supermarket shooting in Buffalo, where a professed white supremacist allegedly murdered 10 people and wounded three others — 11 of the victims were black — Boome repeated the Democrat Party talking points that Fox News host Tucker Carlson was to blame for allegedly spreading the "white replacement theory."

Fact-Checkers Don't Always Check Facts.  "Fact-Checkers" are often just propagandists with a cute title.  In a perfect world, fact-checkers would check just facts.  However, all too often, the anointed arbiters of truth equate opinion as fact and label rhetoric or even parody as "false." Donald Trump was "fact-checked" by the Washington Post 30,573 times. [...] Politifact fact-checked Ron DeSantis when he told high school students that they could take their masks off and offered "They don't do anything."  Politifact labeled that statement false.  Yes, masks "do something," like a screendoor on a submarine will, technically "stop" some water, but from a practical standpoint, cloth masks are near to useless.

WaPo's Professional Doxxer, Who Outed Libs Of TikTok, Just Made Another Outrageous Statement.  For most leftists, particularly those who reside in the echo chamber of the mainstream media and under the protection of Big Tech censorship, self-awareness has never been a key component of their skill set.  The mindset apparently operates something like this:  I'm wonderful, only my opinions matter, all criticisms of me and my work are ill-founded.  And for that reason, the ends justify their means, no matter how reprehensible those means may be.  Last week, Washington Post reporter (please, let's stop calling her a journalist) Taylor Lorenz was the subject of widespread mockery as she was called out for some of the most outrageous media hypocrisy we've seen in years.

The Washington Post Lies — claims they did not publish details about Libs of Tik Tok's personal life.  After Taylor Lorenz doxed Libs of Tik Tok in the pages of the Washington Post, that paper released a statement defending the doxing, and defending Lorenz's journalistic standards.  They also lied, claiming that Lorenz had not published the home address of the Libs of Tik Tok account holder, when in fact, she had.  The article was later scrubbed to purge those details, but they were there when the article was published at 6 am on Tuesday.  They wrote that Lorenz, who cried on MSNBC after getting mean tweets and then blasted MSNBC for interviewing her at all since it led to even more mean tweets, "is an accomplished journalist."  Senior Managing Editor Cameron Barr said that Lorenz's practice of using Antifa-affiliated accounts to gain information, and showing up at the homes of Libs of Tik Tok's family members, were "reporting methods" that "comport entirely with The Washington Post's professional standards."

WashPost Defends Doxxing Libs Of TikTok: 'Comports' With 'Professional Standards'.  In a statement penned Tuesday [4/19/2022], Washington Post senior managing editor Cameron Barr stepped up to defend hypocritical malefactor Taylor Lorenz after she doxed the owner of the Libs of TikTok Twitter account, including her identity and address, all because she exposed the lunatics, groomers, and general extremists of the left.  And rightfully, there was a great public outcry against the paper.  Laughably calling Lorenz an "accomplished and diligent journalist," Barr said her "reporting methods comport entirely with The Washington Post's professional standards."

Washington Post Publishes Straight Up Propaganda Piece Outing 'Libs Of Tik Tok'.  Washington Post reporter Taylor Lorenz exposed the identity behind the "Libs of Tik Tok" Twitter account in an article that widely characterized exposure of questionable school policy and problematic teacher-student interactions as "anti-LGBT."  Rather than grapple with the issues the account brought to light — some of which resulted in discipline of teachers — Lorenz drew on interviews from transgender left-wing activists at the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the left-wing organization Media Matters, who predictably supported the narrative that exposing controversial classroom instruction to the public at large essentially amounts to bigotry for the transgender and gay community.  Absent from Lorenz's article were specifics that might cut across the reality The Washington Post sought to impart on readers, as well as individuals voicing their support for the account.  The Libs of Tik Tok account rose to prominence by simply reposting crazed gender- and race-focused rants far left teachers themselves posted on social media.

'Something is up': Jim Jordan spots major shift in Hunter Biden story.  A top House Republican thinks "something is up" as the federal investigation into Hunter Biden and his financial practices heats up.  Rep. Jim Jordan said on Sunday it "sure seems" the president's son is on his way to being indicted, though the congressman acknowledged he could not say for certain.  He pointed to an upswell in reporting on the authentication of contents on a laptop believed to have belonged to Hunter Biden, coinciding with a wave of grand jury activity.  "You mentioned those two stories from the Washington Post 10 days ago," the Ohio Republican told host Maria Bartiromo on Fox News.  "I understand they were four minutes apart.  One was at 11:00.  One was at 11:04.  So two eight-page-long stories four minutes apart from the news organization that said 18 months ago there was no story here, this was Russian disinformation.  That tells you something is up.  You don't see the Washington Post do that."

Washington Post Editorial Board Admits Its Complicity In Covering Up Hunter Biden Laptop Story.  Last month, the mainstream media finally admitted that the contents of Hunter Biden's laptops were accurate after sitting on the story for nearly a year and a half and discrediting it as 'Russian disinformation.'  The Washington Post is allegedly one of the outlets that was given a copy of Hunter Biden's hard drive roughly a year ago and just chose to 'verify' its contents less than a week ago.  This morning [4/3/2022], the Washington Post released an article saying that the mainstream media's admission that Hunter Biden's laptop was real is an opportunity for a 'reckoning.'

Why the Washington Post Cannot 'Correct' Its Trayvon Tribute.  On February 26, the Washington Post commemorated the ten-year anniversary of Trayvon Martin's death with a loving and outrageously dishonest video tribute to the fallen 17-year-old.  Even more troubling, columnist Charles Blow enlisted former president Barack Obama in this mendacious rewrite of recent history.  On Friday morning, March 4, I sent an email to "corrections."  I sent the same email to managing editor Sally Buzbee and several other relevant editors.

Did The Slaves Or MLK Know Freedom Was Actually A Dog Whistle For White Supremacy?  Everything is racist nowadays.  Bike helmets are vestiges of Jim Crow, at least according to the city of Seattle.  Who knew? [...] An article by an over-educated and underwhelming thinker was published in the Washington Post not so long ago. [...] The Washington Post's content isn't worth the paper it's printed on, and it isn't like it has a great track record.  In its intellectually and morally corrupt defense of the Biden administration, it has published other articles proclaiming the virtues of steep inflation and admired the prospects of safety and wealth foreign wars could bring us.  Aside from the big words, you could be forgiven for assuming this logic belonged to a five-year-old.

Misinformation 101: A Washington Post hit job in Florida.  I'm not blind to the concerns over irresponsible extremists utilizing social media to spread nonsensical theories that are predicated upon half-truths or outright fabrications.  It happens, it's irresponsible, and it's dangerous.  But while you'll never get any argument from me about the need for vigilance regarding the perilous murmurs of online conspiracy theories, I will always be far more alarmed by the insidious misinformation that flows intentionally from the wellspring of major media in this country. [...] For instance, this last week the Washington Post ran a transparent hit piece on Florida's Republican Governor Ron DeSantis and his state's pending bill that would prohibit teachers from proselytizing the new religion of gender and sexual orientation in classes — things like this: [...]

Washington Post, New York Times should give back their Pulitzers for Russia-Trump 'reporting'.  With the entire Russiagate affair exposed as a Clinton campaign fabrication, it's the clear duty of The Washington Post and New York Times to give back the Pulitzers they won for "reporting" the fake news.  Clinton campaign cash ordered up the "Steele dossier," with Democratic operatives providing some of the rumors and a cynical Russian exile asking buddies to supply rank speculation for the rest.  Other Clintonites actually hacked Trump computers, including White House ones after he took office, to create another smear, as Special Counsel John Durham's latest filing revealed.  That's all there ever was:  A Team Clinton scheme to make her e-mail scandal look tame by comparison, and so win the 2016 election, followed by a longer drive to cripple the new president.  It was a true "war on democracy," abetted by the two papers in endless, breathless "reporting."

Washington Post columnist goes on CNN to claim that president is being treated worse than Trump by press.  Three senior White House officials have embarked on a campaign to persuade newsroom executives to be more favorable in their coverage of President Joe Biden, according to a report on Tuesday night.  The trio — National Economic Council Deputy Directors David Kamin and Bharat Ramamurti, along with Ports Envoy John Porcari — have been 'briefing major newsrooms over the past week,' according to CNN's media correspondent, Oliver Darcy.  Darcy, in his newsletter, said that their outreach was sparked by concern that Biden was not being treated fairly.

The Editor says...
If Joe Biden was treated the way Donald Trump was treated in the news media, Hunter Biden's scandals — as documented in his abandoned laptop computer — would be front-page material every day.  So would Joe Biden's obvious senility.  And there still hasn't been any honest discussion of the fraudulent 2020 election.  Nor does anyone know who's making Joe Biden's decisions for him.  Why is the Mexican border wide open?  Why is the price of gas so much higher than it was a year ago?  Why does Joe Biden spend so much time on vacation, and why does he take so many three-day weekends off-duty?  Why hasn't Joe Biden eradicated the coronavirus, as he promised he would?  Does anybody suffer from severe side-effects after getting their so-called "vaccination" for Covid?  Why are booster shots necessary?  Why do vaccinated people have to wear masks?  Why is Australia turning into a police state?  And Austria  And Germany?  Why can't Joe Biden answer spontaneous questions from random reporters, rather than having the questions and answers scripted?  Why is it that Joe Biden makes personal appearances so rarely, and even then only protesters and news media show up?  The "mainstream" news media should ask these questions, but they don't.

Washington Post Columnist Claims Press Is Tougher On Biden Than They Were On Trump.  Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank has hilariously claimed that the media is harder on Joe Biden than they were on Trump.  People in media really believe no one remembers anything that has happened over the last five years.  The media was outright hostile to Trump and everyone in his administration every single day.

Biden's top aide Ron Klain complains press coverage is too negative.  He's the Whine House Chief of Staff.  President Biden's top aide, Ron Klain, took to Twitter Saturday to decry press coverage of his boss.  The chief of staff — known to insiders as the "Prime Minister" for his outsize influence inside the West Wing — shared an opinion essay from the Washington Post arguing that Biden was receiving worse coverage than former President Trump.  The piece from Post opinion columnist Dana Milbank warned that "My colleagues in the media are serving as accessories to the murder of democracy."

The Editor says...
I invite you to compare the media bias in opposition to President Trump to the news media bias in Joe Biden's favor.

How the Corporate Media Launched a Disinformation Campaign to Protect Fauci.  By now you've surely heard about Anthony Fauci and his laboratory beagles, but in case you haven't, it goes like this:  For forty years, Fauci, as the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), has funded gruesome experiments on animals.  Beagles in particular are one of the favored species for these experiments, because of their docile and people-pleasing nature, which makes for less hassle for the humans who subject them to pain and suffering.  In one of these NIAID-funded experiments, in Tunisia, sedated beagles' heads were put into mesh bags with swarms of starved sand flies, who fed on the live dogs.  The other thing you may have heard is that the story is just another right-wing conspiracy theory.  You may have heard this from The Washington Post, from any of a number of self-proclaimed "fact checkers," or maybe even from the globally renowned Beacon of Honesty David Frum of The Atlantic.  I've been reporting on this story for the past few weeks.  In fact, I've been reporting it as closely as anyone, if not more so.  It's been an extremely educational experience for me, but not because I was unfamiliar with the industry of animal experimentation, or NIAID's leading role within it.  What's been educational is seeing up close and first-hand how the mainstream media constructs and deploys a brazen misinformation campaign.

To Protect Fauci, The Washington Post is Preparing a Hit Piece on the Group Denouncing Gruesome Dog Experimentations.  Anger over the U.S. Government's gruesome, medically worthless experimentation on adult dogs and puppies has grown rapidly over the last two months.  A truly bipartisan coalition in Congress has emerged to demand more information about these experiments and denounce the use of taxpayer funds to enable them.  On October 24, twenty-four House members — nine Democrats and fifteen Republicans, led by Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) — wrote a scathing letter to Dr. Anthony Fauci expressing "grave concerns about reports of costly, cruel, and unnecessary taxpayer-funded experiments on dogs commissioned by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases."  Similar protests came in the Senate from a group led by Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY).  The campaign to end these indescribably cruel, taxpayer-funded experiments on dogs has been underway for years, long before Dr. Facui became a political lightning rod.

Caused by a SUV
When did the Babylon Bee start writing headlines for the Washington Post?  The headline that appeared at the top of the following tweet from the Washington Post, about the massacre in Waukesha, Wisconsin, appeared to have been written by the Babylon Bee.  [Tweet]  The "tragedy" (not "attack") was CAUSED by the SUV.  Forget about blaming Darrell Brooks; he's a Black man, and therefore cannot be blamed for anything that he does.  Apparently the WaPo has such contempt for African Americans that they have no personal agency.  They are merely the accompaniment to the actions of the machines that they use.  The machines are the responsible party.  How dehumanizing is that!  This vanished tweet is not some troll making fun of the WaPo.  It is real.


Trump Calls on Pulitzer Prize Board to Rescind Awards to Washington Post, New York Times.  Former President Donald Trump is calling on the Pulitzer Prize Board to rescind awards given in 2018 to the staffs of the New York Times and the Washington Post for their reporting that fueled the hoax that the Trump campaign had colluded with Russia to win the 2016 presidential election. [...] Trump added, "For two years, these institutions feverishly pushed one Russia story after another and — despite lacking any credible evidence — attempted to persuade the public that my campaign had colluded with the Russian government."  He called on the news outlets to voluntarily surrender their awards, but if not, he expected the board to act.

Jennifer Rubin, of the WaPo and MSNBC, calls on media to stop treating Republicans as 'normal'.  In a very crowded field, Jennifer Rubin stands out as possibly the most extreme case of Trump Derangement Syndrome among the former conservatives driven mad (in my opinion) by Donald Trump's presidency.  Her hatred of Trump and the party that now is dominated by him and his supporters is so extreme that she wants the media to stop treating it as a legitimate representative of the roughly half the populace that votes for it.  Yesterday [11/13/2021] on MSNBC, she called for new "rules" that would require the media to essentially treat Republicans as pariahs.  [Video clip]

When Liberal Media Narratives Blow Up.  Today it's Kyle Rittenhouse.  Not long ago it was young Nicholas Sandmann.  And, of course, for four years or so it was the Trump-Russia collusion business.  What do these three episodes have in common?  That would be the fact of a wildly untrue liberal media narrative.  Let's start with the current case of the 18-year old Rittenhouse.  Recall that what launched the case was the police shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin of a black man named Jacob Blake in August of 2020.  The incident came on the heels of riots around the country caused by the police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis.  The Blake shooting set off a riot in Kenosha, and the media instantly stirred the pot.  A classic example was the reporting of The Washington Post, which said this, as reported by Fox News:  "Blake, who witnesses said had been trying to break up an argument between two women, was unarmed and shot as he walked back toward his vehicle."  The problem?  Blake was in fact armed — with a knife.  He was shot when, standing arms-length from a policeman, he began making slashing movements at the cop.

WaPo walkback:  Paper yanks chunks of stories based on discredited Steele dossier.  The Washington Post on Friday took the unusual step of correcting and retracting portions of two articles, published in 2017 and 2019, that relied on the now-discredited, Trump-bashing Steele dossier.  Sally Buzbee, the executive editor for the Washington Post, revealed the newspaper was unable to stand by the accuracy of their reporting regarding source Sergei Millian — former president of the Russian-American Chamber of Commerce — noting the recent indictment filed by Special Counsel John Durham this month.

The Rewriting of History Begins After Bombshell Steele Dossier Revelations.  Over the last two weeks, the Steele Dossier, which was pushed for years as a credible source of dirt on Donald Trump, has been completely discredited.  While it's been obvious for a long time that the dossier was unverified and full of false conspiracy theories, John Durham's indictment has given us an eye into exactly how the sausage was made and put the last nail in the coffin.  Igor Danchenko, now indicted for lying multiple times to the FBI, was the chief source for Christopher Steele, but it was a Hillary Clinton operative who actually fed Danchenko many of the salacious claims.  And with those revelations have come the ritual rewriting of history.  The Washington Post has begun to delete parts of past articles that discussed the Steele Dossier.

New Jersey Democracy Died in Darkness?  At The Washington Post, when Democrats are kicked unceremoniously out of office, it can only mean one thing:  Democracy died in darkness.  Take state Sen. Stephen Sweeney, the powerful Democrat leader of the state Senate in New Jersey.  Absolutely no one thought he would lose to a Republican who was a trucker and had a tiny campaign treasury.  Paul Farhi, a veteran media reporter at The Washington Post, diagnosed the problem in a story headlined, "How the media missed a New Jersey senate candidate's racist social media posts — until he'd already won."  A more accurate headline would be, "How the media failed to help a Democrat win (because no one thought he would lose)."  Farhi insisted Ed Durr "had a history of posting bigoted, misogynistic and derogatory comments on social media."  Like what?  None of Durr's tweets were quoted in full by Farhi, and Durr quickly deleted his Twitter account, so a lot of context is missing.

Critics slam WaPo column for blaming crisis in Afghanistan on American people.  A Washington Post column published Sunday was slammed by critics for blaming the ongoing crisis in Afghanistan on the American people, rather than the actual perpetrators of the violence unfolding across the war-torn country.  "If you ask me who is to blame, I would point not only to Biden but to former president Donald Trump — and to all of us, the people of America.  By carrying out this pell-mell withdrawal from Afghanistan, our leaders, after all, were only giving us what we wanted," columnist Max Boot wrote.

War On Standards, Parking Ticket Edition.  The [Washington] Post found that 62 percent of all [parking] fines were issued in neighborhoods where Blacks make up at least 70 percent of the population. [...] Do the Post's statistics demonstrate racial bias in enforcement or do they show that Blacks comply less with parking and traffic laws?  They demonstrate neither.  However, logic suggests that the latter explanation is more plausible.  Take parking tickets, about which I have some first-hand experience.  D.C. meter monitors, most of whom are Black as far as I can tell, have no incentive to give more tickets to Blacks than to Whites.  Neither do their bosses or their bosses' bosses, who are also Black in most cases.  The only incentive these men and women have is to give out as many tickets as possible, so as to maximize city revenue.  As one of the Post's sources, a leading critic of parking and traffic enforcement, says, "their job is only to bring in revenue."  Thus, in all likelihood, they mostly patrol areas where violations tend to occur.

WaPo Ripped For Gushing Over Biden 'Buy American' Plan After Blasting Trump's as Racist.  The Washington Post was called out on social media for hypocrisy over a report heaping praise on President Joe Biden's "Buy American" initiative after ripping then-President Donald Trump's very similar program as "dark" and racist.  A Washington Post story published Wednesday offered effusive approval for Biden's new "Make Buy American Real" initiative and his government's efforts to "bolster U.S. industry."  "Biden Proposes Stronger 'Buy American' Rules for Federal Government, Aiming to Bolster U.S. Industry," noted the headline.

The WaPo's so-called 'journalism' consists of false attacks on Gov. DeSantis.  Although only a small number of people have officially been declared dead following the condo collapse in Miami, Florida, it appears that as many as 159 people may have died.  To any decent person, this is a tragedy.  To Hannah Dreier, though, a "national reporter" at the Washington Post, what happened in Miami is an opportunity to score political points against Governor Ron DeSantis. [...] Ultimately, as a New York Times article explains, the rescue process is a slow one because, when a building collapses, moving debris in one place can cause dangerous shifts in another place, endangering both the rescue personnel and the survivors.  That long, slow process — which requires special funding and the reallocation of state and local resources — is why there are emergency declarations.  Dreier, of course, could have known this if she'd made the slightest effort to investigate.  However, at publications such as the Washington Post, if there's anything that creates an opportunity to attack a Republican, "journalists" don't investigate things.  They simply opine and pretend that they know what they're talking about.

WaPo Publishes Hit Piece Filled with Lies About Marine Veteran and OAN Reporter — Christina Bobb.  Today [6/18/2021], the Washington Post published another fake news hit piece on the amazing, and highly accomplished reporter, Christina Bobb from One America News (OAN).  They are doing everything in their power to hurt the REAL reporters on the ground in Arizona who are reporting the truth about this historic audit process in the Grand Canyon State.  And, they are even FLAT-OUT lying!

Whatever Happened to QAnon?  Back in February, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene was stripped of her committee roles, despite her expression of "regret" for some of her more extreme views.  One of the charges against Rep. Greene is that she has supported QAnon, whose central claim is that there exists an elite whose members exercise political power and who indulge in promiscuity and other corrupt forms of behavior.  In a Washington Post article co-written by Isaac Stanley-Becker and Rachel Bade, Greene was dismissed as having endorsed the "baseless theory" of QAnon.  Stanley-Becker and Bade devoted most of their article to critiquing QAnon rather than addressing Greene's policies, including her unwavering support for the police.  Yet without evidence to corroborate it, the Post authors rejected the central claim of QAnon:  that a powerful cabal of elitists, some with a history of pedophilia and other corrupt practices, exists within the Democrat party and the media that support it.  Maybe liberal journalists don't know corruption when they see it.

WaPo 'fact-checks' black Senator Tim Scott for not being oppressed enough.  The Washington Post's resident fact checker Glenn Kessler dug into the ancestral background of Senator Tim Scott (R-SC), who has been tapped to give the GOP response to President Biden's State of the Union address next week.  Scott, who is an outspoken conservative, has written and spoke[n] about his family's background and his ancestors' work in cotton fields and agriculture.  For Kessler, Scott's placement as a Republican contender to Biden's message means that his ancestry is open for debate.

WashPost Redefines Words to Avoid Calling Biden a Liar.  Ashley Parker in the Washington Post, a corporate media outlet owned by Amazon's Jeff Bezos who receives billions from the government in no-bid contracts, wrote a news article that said President Biden's claims of 'bipartisan support' for his agenda was true because it included support from Republican voters, even though there wasn't a single Republican member of the Senate or House who supported his legislation.  This is wordplay meant to avoid calling President Biden a liar, which he clearly is on this matter.  And by providing this semantic defense, Parker is showing her partisan bias.

The Washington Post Needs To Come Clean About Its Russian Hacking Story Fiasco.  On Friday [1/6/2017], the Washington Post published an earth-shattering report that Russian hackers had infiltrated the U.S. electricity grid through a Vermont utility. [...] This was huge news, and for good reason.  If Russian hackers, or any hackers for that matter, had found their way into the U.S. electricity grid, there would be almost no end to the harm they could cause.  Not surprisingly, the Post story spread like wildfire.  But it turns out that none of it was true.

Biden's border cruelty.  The professional bleeding hearts publicly speak against a border crisis.  They moan about the fate of women and children.  But the bleeding hearts planned and executed this crisis.  They invited the cruelty by lying about President Emeritus Donald Trump.  The bleeding hearts embraced the human trafficking of women and children, despite the abuse they face from the people who transport them to the border.  Illegal aliens are treated as chattel.  We have known about this for over a decade, and yet liberals and the Washington Establishment support the trafficking of human beings.  Amnesty International said in 2010, "An estimated 6 out of 10 migrant women and girls experience sexual violence, allegedly prompting some people smugglers to demand that women receive contraceptive injections ahead of the journey, to avoid them falling pregnant as a result of rape."  In 2019, the Washington Post lied and denied that Amnesty International ever said this.  The wall discourages this migration.  This administration encourages it.  Upon his installation in the Oval Office, Chairman Xiden illegally stopped construction of the wall, unilaterally ended agreements with Mexico and other Latin American countries to curb illegal migration, and otherwise aided and abetted this human trafficking.  Liberals obfuscate his role in the surge of illegal aliens, but Xiden opened the gates of the nation.

Washington Post is slammed for 'social justice guide for toddlers'.  Three-month-old babies should be taught about implicit bias and racial stereotypes, according to a series of experts quoted in The Washington Post.  In a much-mocked article last week, entitled 'Social justice for toddlers', parents were given a list of books, websites, YouTube channels and companies offering 'woke' material for babies and young children.  'Children develop implicit bias as early as three months old, and at four years old are categorizing and developing stereotypes,' one expert told author Natalie Jesionka, a Dalla Lana Global Journalism Fellow at the University of Toronto.

The Editor says...
That's not journalism.  That's outright propaganda.

DC Statehood Is The Next Unicorn The Democrats Are Chasing.  The Washington Post is doing an admirable job of cheerleading for the next unicorn that congressional Democrats are set to pursue, that being DC statehood.  The obvious nature of the power grab that the Democrats are trying to pull off doesn't seem to sway their media enablers in the slightest.  Nor do the historical reasons as to why the District of Columbia wasn't created as a state to begin with.  All that really matters is the opportunity to summon up two more senators from a reliably blue neighborhood, that is smaller in both physical size and population than your average county.  The job for the GOP at this moment, as Yahoo News reports, is to educate the public about what the Democrats are trying to do and why this scheme shouldn't be allowed to come to pass.

Washington Post Accuses Trump Of A Crime Based On Fabricated Quotes.  On Jan. 9, The Washington Post published a bombshell report about what President Trump reportedly said on a phone call to the Georgia elections investigator.  The headline was "'Find the fraud': Trump pressured a Georgia elections investigator in a separate call legal experts say could amount to obstruction."  A few days ago, on March 11, the Post quietly changed the headline and added this correction to the top of the story: [...] Suffice to say, the original story was impactful.  "The president's attempts to intervene in an ongoing investigation could amount to obstruction of justice or other criminal violations, legal experts said, though they cautioned a case could be difficult to prove," reported the Post story.  The conclusion a sitting president may have committed a crime is still in the corrected story, even though that conclusion was initially at least partly based on fabricated quotes.  While they didn't directly cite this Post story, Trump's alleged pressuring of Georgia officials was eventually cited by House Democrats in the impeachment articles against Trump.

Washington Post writer Erik Wemple laments 'serious lapse' after paper botches Trump quotes.  The Washington Post media critic Erik Wemple penned an opinion piece Tuesday slamming the newspaper's "serious lapse" after it admitted to misquoting then-President Donald Trump during a January phone call with an investigator in the office of Georgia's secretary of state.  The Post reported in January, based on the account of one anonymous source, that Mr. Trump had instructed Georgia's lead elections investigator, Frances Watson, to "find the fraud" and that she could become a "national hero" if she did.  The Wall Street Journal's Cameron McWhirter published a recording of the Dec. 23 call last week, revealing that Mr. Trump never made the statements as quoted by The Post.  "If you can get to Fulton, you are going to find things that are going to be unbelievable — the dishonesty," Mr. Trump said in the call.  "Hopefully when the right answer comes out you'll be praised.  I mean, I don't know why, you know they've made it so hard.  They will be praised.  People will say, 'Great.'  Because that's what it's about.  That ability to check and to make it right.  Because everyone knows it's wrong."

Georgia Deputy Secretary of State Outed as Source of Fake Trump Quotes in Washington Post Story.  Back in January, the Washington Post reported that Trump told an official working in Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger's office to "find the fraud" in the state, telling them that they would be a national hero if she did.  The call took place on December 23rd, and was just released, proving that Trump never said that.  In reality, Trump said that'd be praised when the "right answer comes out" and encouraged them to examine mail-in ballots in Fulton county.  The recording was discovered in a then-unnamed official's computer trash bin after they said they didn't think a recording existed.  Without their gross incompetence in what appears to be them trying to cover their tracks, this bogus reporting would've never been exposed.  Afterwards, the Washington Post published an epic correction to the story.  And despite all this, we still didn't know who the source of the bogus quote was — until now.

American Media and Old Soviet Media Are Now Peas in a Pod.  This correction in the "news" pages of The Washington Post a few days ago is simply stunning — and tells you all you need to know about the state of the mainstream media today: [...] The story, part of the Post's scorched-earth coverage of the former president's activities in the aftermath of the disputed 2020 election, sought to depict Trump in the worst possible light, while relying entirely on anonymous "sources" who had a vested interest in destroying the Trump presidency. [...] A better headline for the Post's "correction," of course, would be "Washington Post irresponsibly publishes false story based on malicious hearsay," but that would be a bridge too far for the Democratic operatives currently masquerading as journalists at newspapers such as the Post and The New York Times.  In the interest of pursuing their shared political and social objectives, the major media have aligned their fortunes with the Democrats', and now no longer even pay lip service to the industry's former ideals of impartiality and fairness.

The Washington Post confessed to a very big lie.  On Monday [3/15/2021], conservatives were outraged when the Washington Post, in a teeny little paragraph appended to a major story from January, admitted that the core of the story was a lie based upon false quotations.  I find myself surprisingly unmoved.  First, this is par for the course for the modern, Pravda media.  Second, as long as there are no consequences, and there never are, it's irrelevant that the Washington Post behaved in a morally corrupt, fraudulent way.  This example of moral turpitude from the Washington Post began on January 9. [...] The allegations in the article were explosive.  Amy Gardner alleged that, during a telephone call to a Georgia election investigator, President Trump pressured the investigator to make up fake evidence that would overthrow the results of the election in Georgia.

Wash Post Concedes It Misquoted Trump's Call With Georgia Official.  A controversial December phone call between then-President Donald Trump and a top Georgia official was initially "misquoted" by The Washington Post and then widely disseminated before the release of the call's audio last week prompted a major mea culpa.  Audio of the approximately 6-minute call between Trump and Frances Watson, the chief investigator of the Georgia Secretary of State's office, was published by The Wall Street Journal on March 11 and shows Trump never told anyone on the call to "find the fraud," as was reported at the time.  In the recording of the Dec. 23 call, Trump told Watson she had the most important job in the country at the time and urged her investigators to review signatures going back several years, according to the recording, the Journal reported.

Recording Of Georgia Phone Call Shows Multiple News Outlets Ran Fabricated Trump Quote.  Multiple news outlets ran a story with fake quotes attributed to former President Donald Trump, according to a now-released recording of Trump's call with Frances Watson, the chief investigator of the Georgia secretary of state's office.  The Washington Post first reported the false quotes via an anonymous source in January and said that Trump urged Watson to "find the fraud," adding she'd be a "national hero."  The Post updated its article with a lengthy correction on March 11 after a recording of the phone call revealed no such quotes from Trump.  In the audio, Trump said he won the 2020 election and pushed Watson to look into ballots in Fulton County, Georgia, as he was convinced there was "dishonesty" going on there.  The former president also told Watson she had "the most important job in the country right now" — not, as The Post claimed, that she'd be a "national hero" if she found fraud.

Washington Post:  Hey, sorry these headline-grabbing quotes by President Trump were made up.  Back in December President Trump made a call to Georgia's chief elections investigator urging her to look into fraud in Fulton County.  The Washington Post and other outlets reported on the call in early January, highlight two specific quotes from the call.  One quote that appeared in several headlines claimed that President Trump had asked the investigator to "find the fraud."  In addition, some headline quoted Trump as saying the investigator would be a "national hero" if they did find it.  For instance, a Jan 10 story at the Guardian headlined "'Find the fraud':  details emerge of another Trump call to Georgia officials" opened with both claims: [...]

Washington Post panned for massive correction to Trump-Georgia election story: 'So, they made up quotes'.  The Washington Post made a massive correction Monday [3/15/2021] to a January report about a phone call between then-President Donald Trump and Georgia elections investigator Frances Watson, admitting it wrongly attributed multiple quotes to Trump based on an anonymous source.  The Post initially reported Trump had told an official working in Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger's office to "find the fraud" in the state, which he lost narrowly to Joe Biden, and that she would be a "national hero" if she did.  However, a newly emerged recording of the Dec. 23 call found he didn't use those words.  Instead, Trump said she would be "praised" when the "right answer comes out" and encouraged her to closely examine mail-in ballots in Fulton County, the heavily blue and most populated county in the state.

Washington Post Admits Trump's 'Find the Fraud' Quote Was Fake News.  The Washington Post has issued a correction to a January 9 story in which it claimed that then-President Donald Trump had told a Georgia state elections investigator to "find the fraud."  In fact, an audio recording showed Trump said no such thing.  The Post's original article was headlined: "'Find the fraud': Trump pressured a Georgia elections investigator in a separate call legal experts say could amount to obstruction."  It relied on information from a single anonymous source, described as "an individual familiar with the call who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the conversation."

Washington Post:  Hey, sorry these headline-grabbing quotes by President Trump were made up.  Back in December President Trump made a call to Georgia's chief elections investigator urging her to look into fraud in Fulton County.  The Washington Post and other outlets reported on the call in early January, highlight two specific quotes from the call.  One quote that appeared in several headlines claimed that President Trump had asked the investigator to "find the fraud." In addition, some headline quoted Trump as saying the investigator would be a "national hero" if they did find it.  For instance, a Jan 10 story at the Guardian headlined "'Find the fraud': details emerge of another Trump call to Georgia officials" opened with both claims.

The Many Ways Biden Has Kicked Culture Wars Into Overdrive.  The Washington Post on March 7 published a column in which E.J. Dionne Jr. contended that President Joe Biden is "rolling back the politics of culture wars."  If you've read even a fraction of Biden's executive orders, memoranda, and proclamations, Dionne's assertion will strike you as bizarrely divorced from reality.  If you expected Dionne, a Georgetown professor and Brookings Institution fellow, to address Biden's unilateral actions and explain how they do not, in fact, advance the culture wars, you would be disappointed.  Dionne doesn't mention a single one.

The Washington Post Faces Backlash Over Headline Praising Biden: 'Did Joe Biden Write This?'.  The Washington Post faced backlash on Saturday evening over a headline that praised President Joe Biden in response to the Senate passing Biden's $1.9 trillion coronavirus stimulus package.  The headline, which was later featured in a tweet, stated, "Biden stimulus showers money on Americans, sharply cutting poverty in defining move of presidency."  Reaction to the headline was overwhelmingly negative across the political spectrum with many calling it propaganda.

WaPo Puts Out Full-On Biden Propaganda Tweet That Just Might Blow Your Mind.  The Washington Post did its best to spin the pork-zilla Biden bill that the Senate passed today that's supposedly for "virus relief" but instead seems a huge payoff to a lot of Democratic agenda items and buddies.  Even by usual mainstream media standards, this was pretty bad, bordering on North Korea, Communist China kind of propaganda-speak.  [Tweet]  Are they kidding?  Biden "showers money?"  Like the largesse from the King?  It's our money, from our tax money.  And the only reason many need it is because government denied people the right to work with their lockdown restrictions.  Not to mention that Democrats delayed the bill for months until it was way past the election to try to hurt President Donald Trump's chances.  Indeed Biden actually passed less relief than did Trump to the American people.  Trump already passed $1,800 but apparently that isn't "showering" because he wasn't a Democrat.

Do Not Let The Washington Post Raise Your SonsWashington Post reporter Emma Brown has a new book out.  It's called To Raise a Boy:  Classrooms, Locker Rooms, Bedrooms, and the Hidden Struggles of American Boyhood.  It's a guide to raising boys.  But Brown knows much more about destroying human males than nurturing them.  I know.  I was one of her victims.  On September 16, 2018, Brown reported that Christine Blasey Ford, a psychologist in California, accused Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault.  Kavanaugh had been nominated for the Supreme Court and was about to be voted out of committee.  Ford claimed that he had sexually assaulted her in high school in 1982.  Ford also alleged that I was in the room, and that I witnessed everything before jumping in and breaking it up.  The whole thing was a set up.  And Brown played a key role in this ugly charade.  On the morning of September 16, she broke Ford's story in the Washington Post.  Brown also emailed me to ask about the allegation.  But her questions diverged from what was published in her Washington Post article.

Washington Post Fact Checkers Called President Trump a Liar to Cover Up Biden's Corruption.  [Scroll down]  At the Washington Post, which had declared war on President Trump early on, fact checking became its own industry.  Glenn Kessler, the head of the Post's fact checking team, and two junior members published a book last year titled, Donald Trump and His Assault on Truth.  It was the last hurrah for the team which shut down its presidential fact checking operation in 2021[.]  But Kessler and the Post continued touting its fake database claiming that President Trump had made "30,573 false or misleading claims" even while making it clear that the game had changed.  When Joe Biden falsely claimed that there was no vaccine when he came into office, Kessler insisted that it was a "verbal stumble, a typical Biden gaffe", but not false or a lie.  Whether it's an apple or a banana, truth or a lie, is a matter of the media's opinion and agenda.

Elon Musk Responds To Washington Post Hit Piece: 'Give My Regards To Your Puppet Master'.  The Washington Post published a piece today [2/23/2021] which clearly intends to be a hit piece on Elon Musk and Tesla.  The headline gives a sense of the piece's take:  "Elon Musk moved to Texas and embraced celebrity.  Can Tesla run on Autopilot?" But in the very first paragraph, the story undercuts the claim that Tesla is running on autopilot.

WaPo During Trump: 'Kids In Cages'; WaPo During Biden: 'Migrant Facility For Children'.  The once-great Washington Post is now just another outlet of Newspeak.  In an Orwellian twist, the Jeff Bezos-owned paper has morphed "kids in cages" into "migrant facility for children."  Throughout former President Donald Trump's four years in the White House, the mainstream media, like the Post, repeatedly cited "kids in cages," claiming foreigners entering the U.S. illegally had their children ruthlessly snatched from them and shoved into cages (it was actually former President Barack Obama who started the practice).  But all that's changed now.  "First migrant facility for children opens under Biden," said the Post headline on Monday [2/22/2021].  But in another twist, the facility was actually opened by the Trump administration.

Cozy! WashPost 'Fact Checker' Admits They Won't Count Biden's False Claims.  Glenn Kessler and his Washington Post "Fact Checker" squad celebrated their end-of-term count of President Trump's "false and misleading statements" — 30,573.  Their level of aggression clearly increased as the term went on, since they announced on January 21, 2019 they had arrived at 8,158 of those — or 26.7 percent of the four-year total.  Shelby Talcott of the Daily Caller put the Post on the record explaining what we all could expect:  there will be no False & Misleading Claims count for President Biden. [...] But party affiliation matters:  there was no False & Misleading Statements count for Barack Obama, and there wouldn't have been one if Hillary Clinton won in 2016.

Washington Post caught scrubbing Kamala Harris 'prisoner' story.  The Washington Post scrubbed an unflattering anecdote of Vice President Kamala Harris crassly laughing at the thought of a prisoner begging for a drink of water — then backtracked Friday after an eagle-eyed reporter took notice.  Harris made the comments in a July 2019 Washington Post profile about her relationship with her sister and trusted aide, Maya Harris, when the former California prosecutor was running for president.  But that story disappeared from the site — with its link redirecting to a newer version published on Jan. 11, sans anecdote.  In the opening of the 2019 piece, Harris described her grueling schedule on the campaign trail — and the respite she got from SoulCycle sessions and walks on the beach with her husband.

WaPo Erases Unflattering Anecdote About Harris From 18-Month-Old Story.  [Scroll down]  One of her big liabilities with the left during the 2020 primary was her record on criminal justice as attorney general of California.  Mocking starving prisoners, however jokingly, is a reminder of that liability.  And now it's gone from the WaPo archives.  Fancy that.  Amazingly, WaPo's spokesman admitted to Boehm that the piece had been "repurposed and updated" but noted that the original piece remained available in print.  Okay, but... why isn't it still available in the Post's archives?  They could have kept the original story under its old URL and then created a separate URL for the updated story.  They're owned by Jeff Bezos.  They're not wanting for server space.  There's no reasonable conclusion to be drawn except that WaPo deliberately whitewashed the earlier Harris profile because liberals are now invested in her success as vice president.  I'd consider it dubious if they merely added material to an old story without deleting anything and didn't note that fact somewhere, but to redact information surreptitiously without admitting it is insanely unethical.

Washington Post scrubbed unflattering Kamala Harris story from site, restored it after backlash.  The Washington Post removed an unflattering tidbit about Vice President Kamala Harris from a 2019 feature and republished a new version of the story that is friendlier to the Democratic media darling — but eventually restored a link to the original after widespread backlash.  Reason reporter Eric Boehm noticed the edit and took the Post to task in a scathing breakdown of the situation.  "When The Washington Post published a 2019 campaign trail feature about then-presidential hopeful Kamala Harris' close relationship with her sister, it opened with a memorable anecdote in which Harris bizarrely compared the rigors of the campaign trail to... life behind bars.  And then proceeded to laugh — at the idea of an inmate begging for a sip of water," Boehm wrote, calling it "an extremely cringeworthy moment" that painted Harris in a negative light.

Now the Washington Post Admits Trump Did Not Incite the Capitol Riot.  With the second bogus impeachment in the books, the Washington Post has finally seen fit to admit that President Trump did not incite the storming of the U.S. Capitol on January 6 with his speech, acknowledging that it was, in fact, planned in advance.  The article, published Tuesday [1/19/2021], the day before Biden's inauguration, declares in its headline "Self-styled militia members planned on storming the U.S. Capitol days in advance of Jan. 6 attack, court documents say" and opens with the following paragraphs. [...] CNN acknowledged last week that the storming of the Capitol was planned prior to Trump's speech, reporting that, "Evidence uncovered so far, including weapons and tactics seen on surveillance video, suggests a level of planning that has led investigators to believe the attack on the US Capitol was not just a protest that spiraled out of control, a federal law enforcement official says."

Washington Post Pushes Extreme Fear Porn Claiming Super Secret FBI Report of Mass QAnon Hordes Planning to Invade Washington DC.  They have to come up with some ridiculous reason to justify their 25,000 military troops in Washington DC to install JoeBama, but the Qanon invasion is just, well, a little silly.  According to the Washington Post, the FBI has shared super-secret, non-specific, possible-threat assessments to include militant Qanon supporters posing as National Guard during the inauguration of JoeBama.  Abject silliness has now turned to the structurally absurd.  Of course the evidence is anonymous and denied in the middle of the article... but still, pushed by WaPo.

Facebook's Sandberg deflected blame for Capitol riot, but new evidence shows how platform played role.  In the days leading up to last week's march on the Capitol, supporters of President Trump promoted it extensively on Facebook and Facebook-owned Instagram and used the services to organize bus trips to Washington.  More than 100,000 users posted hashtags affiliated with the movement prompted by baseless claims of election fraud, including #StopTheSteal and #FightForTrump.

The Editor says...
The copious evidence on this page negates the Washington Post's specious assertion of "baseless claims of election fraud."

Mark Levin Debunks Leftist Lie About Conservative Radio Network Instructing Hosts to Stop Talking About Election Fraud.  Conservative pundit and legal scholar Mark Levin pushed back against a Washington Post report on Monday [1/11/2012] claiming that his syndicator is demanding that its talk radio hosts stop talking about vote fraud in the 2020 election. [...] The memo allegedly said that Cumulus "will not tolerate any suggestion that the election has not ended.  The election has been resolved and there are no alternate acceptable 'paths.'  If you transgress this policy, you can expect to separate from the company immediately."  But Levin, who began warning in September that states were unconstitutionally changing their balloting laws ahead of the Nov. 3 election date, has also been explaining the constitutional ins and outs of why those changes were wrong.  Also, he questioned whether the memo was actually real, considering he's never seen it nor has he heard of anyone syndicated by Westwood One getting it, either — which would be par for the course for the Post in the Trump era (phony Russian dossier, 'Russian collusion,' etc.).

Judge dismisses Nunes's defamation suit against Washington Post.  A federal judge dismissed Rep. Devin Nunes's (R-Calif.) defamation lawsuit against The Washington Post this week.  The dismissal is the latest development in a string of lawsuits Nunes has filed against major news outlets.  Nunes filed the lawsuit in March over a story published in the Post about a conversation Nunes had with President Trump about an intelligence briefing. [...] The article claimed that when Trump learned of the analysis, he grew angry at then-acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire.  D.C. District Judge Amit Mehta sided with the Post on Thursday [12/24/2020], writing in his ruling that the newspaper did not act "with 'actual malice,' that is, with 'knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not.'"

If You Disagree, You're a Rat.  Sen. Ron Johnson, among the best qualified and most level-headed of senators, has been labeled a conspiracy theorist by the media because he questioned the validity of the 2020 vote.  We're at the point where any questioning of the liberal consensus is dismissed out of hand.  It's not just that liberals think they're right — they think no other opinions should be heard.  The Washington Post's depiction of dozens of GOP members as "rats" is a new journalistic low.  Reminiscent of Nazi-era depictions of Jews, the cartoon attacks Trump "collaborators" for the same "crime" as Sen. Johnson — questioning the validity of the 2020 election returns.  Liberals aren't interested in discussing the validity of the 2020 election result.  Any conservative response is labeled racist, irrelevant, or a conspiracy theory and then dismissed without discussion.

What the Media Didn't Want To Report About These Capital Punishment Cases.  This summer, the federal government began putting people to death for the first time in 17 years.  "Trump administration executes Brandon Bernard, plans four more executions before Biden takes office," said a Washington Post headline last week.  While that is technically true, it wasn't Trump who convicted these men of murder; it was a jury of their peers.  It wasn't Trump who upheld their convictions after numerous appeals; it was the judicial system.  It wasn't Trump who found the death penalty constitutional; here, it was the Supreme Court that reaffirmed the Federal Death Penalty Act of 1994 requires executions to be carried out "in the manner prescribed by the law of the state in which the sentence is imposed."  It wasn't Trump who sponsored that law in 1994; it was Joe Biden.  Reporters nearly always glide past the horrifying specifics, spending inordinate amounts of space presenting the case of anti-death penalty advocates, who often dishonestly paint these men as victims.

Washington Post:  Denying Election Results Is like Denying Holocaust.  In a Washington Post editorial published Wednesday [12/23/2020], authors Deborah E. Lipstadt and Norman Eisen argue for the radical comparison of challenging recent election results with denying that a Nazi Holocaust, the "best-documented genocide in the world," ever occurred.  The essay, titled "Denying the Holocaust threatens democracy.  So does denying the election results," makes several comparisons while suggesting how to combat such "denial."  Claiming to have "learned the hard way" to take Holocaust denial seriously, the authors state they have "watched with alarm the birth of another powerful disinformation mythology," referring to the "false conviction pushed by Trump and his enablers" that the recent election was "stolen."

Washington Post Cartoon Borrows Page From Nazi Playbook.  In Sunday's Washington Post, a dehumanizing cartoon of Republican lawmakers and government officials graced both sides of the fold in the opinion section.  The giant, tasteless cartoon by Ann Telnaes shows dozens of rats representing various Republicans who the cartoonist identifies as President Trump's collaborators.  "All the Republican rats" reads the headline, followed by the lead, "All of the state attorney generals and U.S. Congress members who collaborated with President Trump in his attempt to subvert the Constitution and stay in office."  Telnaes then labels each rat in the cartoon with a Republican's name so that Washington Post readers know who to hate.  The Nazi's used the same propaganda to dehumanize the Jews.

WaPo's excessively red Covid map
A thread on this viral map, which attempts to paint a very scary picture.  [D]epending on where you live, it is almost certain someone at your Thanksgiving gathering will have COVID.  Look at all that red!  But, the map has massive problems.  The map comes from the Washington Post, but it is based on the COVID-19 Event Risk Assessment Planning tool from GA Tech.  The goal of which is to show what the chances are of having a COVID positive person attend a gathering.  A worthwhile project. [...] This is the Washington Post map, side by side with the map from the actual data source.  Same map, but Wapo makes the "artistic" choice of making the reds much darker and scarier. [...] The larger problem lies at the bottom of the Wapo map.  It says the map "assumes actual case prevalence is 10 times as high as laboratory-confirmed case count."  This, for lack of a better word, is bonkers.


To Tell the Truth:  NYT and WAPO Deliberately Invalidate Election Tampering Claims.  As concerns mount surrounding election tampering in multiple key states, The New York Times and The Washington Post have all but ignored credible allegations.  In its Wednesday report that Biden "won Michigan," The New York Times emphasized that Biden's "campaign invested heavily to secure a straightforward path to victory." The Times did note that the Trump campaign announced that it was taking legal action due to "what it called insufficient transparency."  The report glazed over these concerns, quoting "Mr. Trump's" campaign manager's accusation that "President Trump's campaign has not been provided with meaningful access to numerous counting locations to observe the opening of ballots and the counting process, as guaranteed by Michigan law."

I Did Not Recant!' Postal whistleblower in Pennsylvania disputes claims by media that he recanted.  In a confusing series of events Tuesday [11/10/2020], claims of voter fraud made by a mail carrier in Erie, Pa., were left somewhat muddied.  Postal worker Richard Hopkins alleged that he overheard a postmaster telling staff to backdate ballots mailed after the Election Day deadline.  Amid reports he recanted his allegation, Hopkins appeared on video to double down on his claims.  The Democrat-run House Oversight Committee cited the U.S. Postal Service's Office of the Inspector General to claim that Hopkins "completely recanted" his allegations. [...] With the media working feverishly to dispel any thoughts about voter fraud, the Washington Post reported that in addition to recanting his allegations in a sworn affidavit, Hopkins admitted to postal investigators that he fabricated his claims of voting irregularities.  The newspaper cited "three officials briefed on the investigation" — rest assured these officials are very likely Democrats eager to muddy the waters amid an election that has been marred by allegations of voter fraud, brought on in part by millions of unsolicited mail-in ballots flooding battleground states.

Post Office Whistleblower Denies Recanting Statement Witnessing Ballot Fraud — Demands Washington Post Retract False Claims.  U.S Postal Worker Richard Hopkins came forward to expose specific irregularities with the back-dating of ballots which he personally witnessed.  Several U.S. Senators demanded AG Bill Barr immediately investigate the claims and sworn affidavit.  However the Washington Post ran a story yesterday (has been re-written several times) claiming Mr. Hopkins recanted his statements.  After reading the Washington Post story, whistleblower Richard Hopkins tells the newspaper their story is false, he did not recant.  However, the Washington Post refuses to remove the story, instead they re-write it several times attempting to retain the falsity.

Washington Post piece calls on media to report Hunter Biden leaks as foreign disinformation, even if it 'probably' isn't.  An analysis piece in the Washington Post stated journalists should treat the leaked emails allegedly recovered from Hunter Biden's laptop as a foreign disinformation campaign, even if the claim lacks evidence.  "Take a step back, and the Russian interference of 2016 holds valuable lessons on what to do and what not to do in 2020," wrote Thomas Rid in the Washington Post under the paper's "Perspective" section.  "We must treat the Hunter Biden leaks as if they were a foreign intelligence operation — even if they probably aren't."  "What an incredible admission in the Washington Post, wow.  The hubris it must take to issue journalistic marching orders this contrived in full view of the public," Daily Caller editor Geoffrey Ingersoll said of the Washington Post's article on Twitter.

'Republicans Pounce' On Democrats' 'Hypothetical' Plan To Destroy Judicial Branch.  "Republicans pounce" is a favorite framing used by corporate media to spin newsworthy topics they are forced to cover at Democrats' expense.  Instead of reporting the news, the news becomes the fact that Republicans or "conservative media" are reacting to said news.  Such is the case with the consequential news that Joe Biden said he would not share his stance on court packing until after he was elected, an announcement that sounds more like a hostage situation than a campaign promise.  The Washington Post reported the former vice president's shocking and unprecedented statement with a masterfully spun tweet Thursday, writing, "Republicans continue attacking Biden, Harris over hypothetical 'court-packing' question."

BLM Supporter Tied to Michigan Gov. Whitmer Kidnapping Plot — Demands Grow for Her to Apologize to Trump.  Yet another one of the conspirators indicted in the plot to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer has turned out to be an anarchist and this time is an identified Black Lives Matter [...] supporter.  If you're keeping book, that now means at least three of the six men indicted by the federal government for the frightening conspiracy to kidnap the governor from her vacation home are avowed anti-Donald Trump anarchists and at least one is a BLM protester.  When half the conspirators rolled up by the feds are anarchists, this is what you might call a pattern.  The BLM connection comes from no less than The Washington Post, which buried the lede of its own story by headlining its piece, "Accused leader of plot to kidnap Michigan governor was struggling financially, living in basement storage space," as if living in a basement was the most surprising thing about the conspirator.  Indeed, we can be assured that if one of the conspirators had attended a Trump rally that would have headlined the story.

Both Are In The Same Church, But Media Love Joe Biden's Faith And Hate Amy Coney Barrett's.  The media loves to fawn over the pious and heartfelt Catholicism of Joe Biden.  Now they're talking about the Catholic faith of Amy Coney Barrett, the frontrunner to be appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court.  But you'll notice a very different tone.  The key differences are their adherence to their faith's actual teachings, as well as their political leanings.  The Washington Post can't call Barrett a "devout Catholic" without including in the same sentence that she is "fervently antiabortion."  Meanwhile, Biden touts his Catholicism — despite his support for abortion, which church teaching expressly calls a "moral evil."  The Post also notes that, when Barrett was first nominated to the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, "Democrats balked at her nomination, questioning whether the academic could be an impartial arbiter because of her deep religious convictions."  If Biden has deep religious convictions, it has never bothered the Post.

Washington Post Too Stupid to Tell Difference Between Facts and Predictions.  Salvador Rizzo's Washington Post bio says he has a bachelor's degree in English from Emory University, but somehow he's not smart enough to tell the difference between a fact, and a prediction.  On September 11, this so-called "fact checker" awarded "Four Pinocchios" to this statement:
      "Mail-In Ballots will lead to massive electoral fraud and a rigged 2020 Election."  — President Trump, in a tweet, July 2, 2020
This is one of the most annoying dirty tricks of the "fact checking" trade.  Smear your target as a "liar" because you don't like the predictions they're making.

Will Antifa and Black Lives Matter cancel the Biden-Harris ticket?  [Scroll down]  A Washington, D.C., college professor recently confessed to posing as African American.  Despite voicing public remorse for her deception and her voluntary self-cancellation, Washington Post columnist Karen Attiah piled on accusing the now former professor of performing the ultimate act of White privilege.  How this masterpiece of Orwellian illogic got past her editors remains a matter for conjecture, but Ms. Attiah reflects the prevailing winds of progressive intellectualism.

Washington Post January 2020: POTUS "Hyping" COVID Panic — September 2020: POTUS "Downplayed" COVID Panic.  After watching political narrative engineering for years, this attempt was predictable.  The reason why CTH maintains a "pinned thread" on the White House COVID-19 response from January and February of 2020 is specifically because we knew the narrative engineers would attempt to weaponize the politics of the virus later in the election year.  We knew the narrative engineers would flip the script.  Today [9/9/2020] they did exactly that.

Washington Post Interviews Clay Travis With An Incoherent Series Of Tween-Speak Questions.  Clay Travis of "Outkick The Coverage" was approached by the Washington Post to do an interview.  The WaPo wanted to do a hit job on him because Clay is a rogue sports journalist who has angered the mainstream media for being anti-PC, and for mocking the left-wing herd mentality of sports journalists.  In so doing he has built a huge following and a nice little sports empire.  Clay acknowledged to his readers that it was going to be a hit job, so in expectation of the upcoming slander, he recorded the whole interview.  At his own web site, Clay points out that of the 2300 words in the story, exactly 94 were words alleged to have been spoken by him, but even those included one "quote" that he never said.

Citing more anonymous former employees, Wa-Po says Postmaster General may have committed election law crimes.  Democrats and their media allies do not appear to have a lot of faith in the party's 2020 nominee, Joe Biden, as they seem to be laying the groundwork for disputing and/or contesting his eventual fall in November.  One such angle has been the ongoing focus on President Trump allegedly working to undermine the U.S. Postal Service ahead of election day, as spotty as the claims may be.  In what looks to be a furtherance of that campaign, the Washington Post rolled out a story Sunday [9/6/2020] about U.S. Postmaster General Louis DeJoy allegedly being involved in a straw donor scheme.

When Information Is Disinformation.  While most national media outlets covered the Democratic and Republican National Conventions over the last two weeks, the Washington Post decided to go to war with a little-known website called Protect My Vote.  While the Post labeled the site and its corresponding advertisements a "disinformation campaign," ironically, the paper's own news coverage supports the site's message around a key piece of voter education:  Your vote is more likely to be counted when it is cast in person.  In an added twist, Protect My Vote directs visitors from every state to their specific government agencies to register to vote, to request an absentee ballot, or to find their polling place.  Bizarrely, a site underscoring official government resources is now categorized by the Washington Post as disinformation.

A Tyranny Perpetual and Universal?  [Scroll down]  The [Washington] Post has always been a liberal rag.  But it was never so brazenly anti-American, so shamelessly dishonest, so unreservedly dedicated to racial grievance-mongering.  It used to be able to call a riot a riot and not resort to ridiculous euphemisms like "mostly peaceful" to describe rampant street violence.  Above all, the Post used to care about its home town.  It doesn't anymore.  The District of Columbia, into which I must occasionally (and reluctantly) venture, is a shell of what it was just months ago.  For the span of several weeks, there was a riot roughly every night.  Businesses everywhere are now closed — and not just from COVID-19.  Windows everywhere are boarded up.  Graffiti, much of if revolutionary, covers seemingly every square inch of vertical space.  The streets are deserted.  To the extent that you see anyone, chances are above 50 percent it's a vagrant.  At the few restaurants that remain open, thanks to outdoor seating, diners are as likely as not to be accosted by bullhorn-wielding anarchists.  The town has a post-apocalyptic feel.  The newspaper founded in Washington in 1877 speaks of all this out of three sides of its mouth: none of it is happening; all the protests are peaceful and justified; it's good that America is finally getting the thrashing she deserves.

Conflict: WashPost Columnist Gushes for Biden, Discloses Her Son Works for BidenWashington Post reporter-turned-columnist Karen Tumulty has a splashy big positive column about Biden campaign manager Jennifer O'Malley Dillon in the Sunday paper headlined "The woman who transformed Joe Biden's campaign."  The pull quote gushed that "political veterans say the harmony she has fostered with the Democratic National Committee and the party's liberal allies is smoother than anything seen in decades." [...] This presents a rather obvious conflict of interest when writing about the Biden campaign.  We all want our adult children to have promising careers, but this certainly colors every gushy thing Tumulty writes about the Biden campaign.  Tumulty is married to Los Angeles Times correspondent Paul Richter, and they have two sons, Nicholas and Jack.  Google suggests Nicholas was born in 1992, so he's an "adult son," but I don't yet know if he's the right Richter.  After some biography, Tumulty turned to the big picture, which was very Democratic: [...]

Six To One:  Washington Post 'Fact Checker' Is Attacking Republicans, Soft on Democrats.  Now that the Democratic ticket has been set and the (virtual) convention is about to launch, it's a good time to evaluate how tilted The Washington Post "Fact Checker" is when it comes to not just Trump and Biden, but to all Republicans and all Democrats.  To get a sense of the overall tone, I counted up how many "Pinocchios" were awarded to politicians of both parties.  Granted, the Post often spares its marionettes when a politician tries to apologize for his mistakes.  But they often throw the maximum "Four Pinocchios" at the president.  Over the summer, it's been a very tilted time.  In June, there were 40 Pinocchios thrown at Republicans, and just 10 for Democrats.  In July, it was even worse:  39 Pinocchios for Republicans, and zero for Democrats.  From June 16 through July 31, it was 62 to zero.

The Washington Post's 'Fact Checker,' Not Pence, Deserves the 4 Lying 'Pinocchios'.  Glenn Kessler, the so-called "fact checker" at The Washington Post, this week called out Vice President Mike Pence's answer to an interview question about election fraud.  But it's Kessler, not Pence, who deserves four "Pinocchios" for many of the misleading claims he makes about it in his column.  Pence said:  "Make no mistake about it.  The reality of voter fraud is undeniable.  We've seen case after case around the country where there have been prosecutions."  Kessler concentrates on a case in Indiana that the vice president — a former governor of that state — mentioned in passing, and the dispute is over the timing and exact details.  Fraudulent voter registrations were submitted by 12 individuals working for the Indiana Voter Registration Project, which, according to Kessler, was "associated with Patriot Majority USA."

Antifa Propagandists:  WashPost Praises Violent Portland Rioters' 'Stamina' [and] 'Creativity'.  Antifa sympathizers in the media whitewashed the left-wing group's violence yet again this past weekend, gifting them with a glossy photo essay in The Washington Post.  Reporter Marissa J. Lang tried to soften the radical activists' image by featuring a family of four, a veteran and "moms" flaunting their ridiculous riot gear along with self-righteous quotes they gave to the paper.  It's hard not to gag when Lang lovingly described how Portland's left-wing "protests" are what "Portland does best" and are "as natural as the salmon swimming in the Willamette River."  Sounding like Antifa's publicist, she touted the demonstrations have "yielded real results" (such as defunding the police and forcing out federal agents.)  The Post reporter of course downplayed the violent methods as just "vandalism" of course, before cheering on their "stamina and creativity:" [...]

Washington Post:  It doesn't matter that the most violent cities in America are run by Democrats.  Usually, we elect mayors to do the job of running things and one of the most important parts of their job is public safety.  Especially in cities with higher crime rates, crime reduction is often a major point of discussion during election season.  For instance, Memphis, Tennessee is at the top of the per capita crime list. [...] Why would the fact that the winner is almost always going to be a Democrat not matter?  Don't Democrats tend to have certain specific views about crime, policing, mass incarceration, etc.?  Don't Republicans have a reputation for being tougher on crime, more friendly to police and prosecutors, etc.?  How can this not matter?

An Aristocracy of Losers.  Even by the standards of the Washington Post, Sunday's [5/17/2020] feature on Stacey Abrams was remarkable.  And by "remarkable," of course I mean, ludicrous.  The hagiographic profile, which ran to more than 5,000 words, likened her to "a runway supermodel" and included a silhouette photo of Abrams, enshrouded by machine-made fog, that provoked widespread derision on social media.  Of course, any criticism of Abrams will immediately be denounced by liberals as racist and sexist, which is the most obvious reason why Abrams has been promoted as a "rising star" of the Democratic Party.  The liberal media enjoy nothing more than denouncing Americans as hate-filled bigots.

Sen Cruz exposes WaPo's abandonment of journalism.  The Washington Post fact checker published a video describes as "amazing," claiming it was doubtful the Wuhan Virus came from the Wuhan laboratory.  After basically showing why it might have come from the lab, they concluded it's doubtful it came from the lab.  They have some red herrings thrown in.  Senator Cruz eviscerated their "amazing" video.

Cruz: How Did the Washington Post Reach its Conclusion on Wuhan Despite Having All the Facts?  China is guilty.  Most admit this.  Unless you're the World Health Organization or, it turns out, The Washington Post.  We know that the coronavirus originated in Wuhan, China, and we know that the CCP covered it up for days, letting the virus travel far and wide and infect millions of people.  Thanks to their incompetence and their deadly cover up, thousands of people have now succumbed to the virus, including 63,000 Americans.  More recent evidence suggests that the virus actually escaped from a Wuhan lab that failed to follow safety protocols.  Washington Post's Fact Checker Glenn Kessler knows all this and shared a video from his colleague admitting as much.  Yet, he concluded that it was "doubtful" that the new coronavirus was accidentally released from a Wuhan lab.

Study: Washington Post Bashes Trump Virus Response with 25-to-1 Negative Headlines.  As the leading newspaper in the nation's capital, the editors of The Washington Post know much of their influence comes from their ability to set an agenda for the many powerful political and media people who read it on a daily basis.  And the first thing those powerful readers see every morning are the big headlines on The Post's front page, framing the news the way The Post's editors want them to see it.  In the 100 days since the coronavirus epidemic began to receive significant news coverage, The Post has used its front page to undermine the administration's response to the unprecedented crisis, with dozens of headlines flagrantly editorializing against the President and nearly everyone on his team.

Washington Post's Amber Phillips Spreads Fake News About Cost of Isopropyl Alcohol.  On Thursday, the Trump administration and its medical experts revealed that isopropyl alcohol is quite effective in cleaning surfaces suspected of being infected with the coronavirus.  Within a minute or so, the virus dies.  To any sane person interested in saving lives, offering a little hope, reducing infections, and informing Americans of this important find, this is good news, the kind of news a morally responsible and humane media would want to share with the public.  Unfortunately, as we have learned since the CNN Race Riots of 2014, we do not have a morally responsible or humane media, rather we have a sociopathic media willing to destroy countless lives in pursuit of their far-left political agenda.

Don't Let The Washington Post Get Away With Memory-Holing Its Anti-Kavanaugh Campaign.  The Washington Post has a problem.  The newspaper led the massive effort against the nomination of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh by publishing and relentlessly hyping a completely unsubstantiated allegation of sexual assault against him.  Now, the paper is leading Democrats' efforts to bury a similar, if stronger, allegation of sexual assault against Joe Biden.  To accomplish this dramatic turnabout, the paper is collectively trying to rewrite history, pretending the allegation against Kavanaugh had more basis than it did while also pretending that the allegation against Biden has less basis than it does.

7 Devastating Revelations About Crossfire Hurricane In New Releases.  [#5] FBI Relied Solely on Fake News to Support Portions of the FISA Applications:  The additional FISA application declassifications reveal another disconcerting fact:  The FBI relied completely on media reports that ended up being inaccurate to "assesses that, following Page's meetings in Russia, Page helped influence [the Republican Party] and Trump's campaign to alter their platforms to be more sympathetic to Russia."  In the FISA applications, the FBI supported this "assessment" with summaries of the reporting by two "identified news organizations," one a July 2016 article and the second an August 2016 article.  While the FISA applications did not identify the articles, "one was apparently Josh Rogin's Washington Post opinion article, which reported claims that Trump campaign members 'worked behind the scenes to make sure [the GOP]'s platform would not call for giving weapons to Ukraine to fight Russian and rebel forces.'"

Another Dishonest Smear By the Washington Post.  Yesterday's [4/13/2020] Washington Post carried an attack on South Dakota and its governor, Kristi Noem [...] The point of the Post story is to convey the impression that Governor Noem's reliance on voluntary measures, education, persuasion, and close cooperation with federal agencies, other governors, and the private sector is a failure.  Strikingly absent from the Post's hit job, however, is the bottom line:  how many South Dakotans have actually succumbed to COVID-19?  The answer:  6, and none have been reported within the last week.  South Dakota has one of the best coronavirus records of any state, but the Post didn't tell its readers that.  It would have ruined the narrative.

The Washington Post Runs a Shameless CIA Authored Hit Piece to Blame President Trump for the Spread of Wuhan Virus.  On Friday [3/20/2020], the Washington Post posted a bizarre and counterfactual story that alleges that Wuhan virus spread into the United States because President Trump ignored warnings from... get this... our intelligence agencies about a pandemic developing in China, a pandemic that was to become the foreign Chinese Wuhan Kung-Flu bat virus pandemic that has panicked us into shutting down the US economy.  The bylines are Shane Harris, Greg Miller, Josh Dawsey and Ellen Nakashima.  All of these will seem familiar from the Russia Hoax stories that rolled out of the Post like marbles from a bag with holes in it. [...] What these clowns, and by clowns I mean the Eric Ciaramella squad that is still ensconced in the Intelligence Community and who regularly use their duty position to impress credulous reporters into writing hit pieces on President Trump, are trying to do is to recreate the smear directed against President George Bush over 9/11.  They use the exact same tactic as they did to blame Bush for 9/11.

WaPo: Biden Didn't Lie, He 'Described His Stance Inaccurately'.  A Washington Post fact-checker ruled Thursday that Joe Biden hadn't lied when he said he supported a fracking ban during Sunday's Democratic presidential debate.  Rather, Biden had simply "described his fracking stance inaccurately."  The Post gave Biden "Zero Pinocchios" for saying during the most recent Democratic debate that he opposed fracking entirely.  Instead, the paper pointed to the Biden campaign's explanation that the candidate had "misspoken" and that "his position was the same as ever," opposing fracking only on public lands.  Meanwhile, the Post criticized those who quoted Biden's remarks verbatim.  "Critics pounced," the fact-checker wrote.  "Republican operatives cut a short video of Biden's remarks, to use as a cudgel in races against moderate House Democrats.  Sanders supporters accused Biden of misleading voters about his policy, which doesn't ban fracking outright, as Sanders would."

Jennifer Rubin's death wish for Republicans is factually wrong, and the maps prove it.  Once upon a time, Jennifer Rubin was an intelligent woman.  Things started to go downhill when she went to work for the Washington Post, but what really flipped the switch in her brain was seeing Donald Trump become president.  Not only did she lose perspective, but she also lost intelligence, self-restraint, and decency.  Her latest flight of NeverTrump nastiness has her speculate about possible Republican deaths during a time of coronavirus.  Her speculation not only reveals an even further degradation of mind and soul, but she's got things entirely [...] wrong — and a couple of maps prove it.  Maybe the seeds of Rubin's decay were always there, considering that she attended U.C. Berkeley both as an undergraduate and at law school.  Her downslide might also have come from spending twenty years in Hollywood, working as a Labor and Employment lawyer in Hollywood.

Panic Never Helped Any Pandemic And Won't Start Now.  Invoking the "Black Death," which probably wiped out a third of Europe, both CNN and the Washington Post have reported that Iran is digging (per the Post) "Coronavirus Burial Pits So Vast They're Visible From Space."  Never mind that Google can read your license plate from space, nor that on average more than 12,000 Iranians die daily and the country has reported less than 80 COVID-19 deaths since virus was detected there a month ago.  For those without enough fingers, that's a 0.02% increase in deaths per day.  The cemeteries can handle it.

Washington Post (CIA) Starts:  "Bernie is a Russian Asset" Narrative.  The CIA leaks narrative spin to the Washington Post.  The FBI leaks their narrative spin to the New York Times; and the State Dept. primarily uses CNN for the same purposes.  This media distribution model is the one constant in an ever changing universe.  Today's Club narrative was too predictable.  Everyone who does not support the DC intel apparatchik immediately becomes a Russian asset.  Now, "according to people familiar with the matter", the Russians are trying to help Bernie Sanders.

Devin Nunes Suing Washington Post Over 'Garbage' Report.  Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) announced Friday night that he is suing the Washington Post, accusing the paper of publishing "demonstrably false" "garbage" about him.  "I don't know what planet the Washington Post is on but they'll have an opportunity in federal court in the next couple weeks to explain who their sources are because I'm going to have to take them to court," Nunes told Fox News host Harris Faulkner.  Nunes was appearing on Fox's "The Story" (with Faulkner filling in for Martha MacCallum) to talk about a recent classified briefing to House intelligence members.  As has become expected, information (and disinformation) from that briefing was promptly leaked to the media.

America's Opinion Journalists Ranked:  The Good, The Bad, and The Worst.  E.J. Dionne (Washington Post).  If E.J. Dionne had been employed not by the Post, but by the Democratic National Committee, none of the pieces he has written for years would read even a little bit differently.  The gentleman practices partisan flackery without surcease or distinction.

WaPo's Rubin Completes Descent Into Self-Parody, Swooning Over Schiff's 'Brilliant' Legal Skills.  This all wouldn't be so awkward if Jennifer Rubin weren't still billing herself as the "conservative blogger" for The Washington Post. [...] Rubin's journey as a #NeverTrump zealot has been one of the weirder ones to observe these past few years.  Even before being exposed to toxic peer-pressure levels of Coastal Media Trump Derangement Syndrome, Rubin wasn't really what anyone outside of the northeastern United States could call a "conservative."  She was merely conservative relative to the people around her.  While many fauxservative Never Trump types spent most of 2017 and 2018 criticizing the president and celebrating other Republicans who agreed with them, our girl Jen almost immediately donned a cheerleader skirt and began positively gushing for any Trump-hating lefty she became aware of.

Hillary Clinton Vindicated On Corruption Charges?  Hardly.  Last week, the Washington Post reported that the Justice Department had wound down a Hillary Clinton-related inquiry after finding "nothing of consequence."  That set off a series of Hosannas from the allegedly non-partisan press, which seems to notice quid pro quos only when they involve a Republican.  A quick review of the flagrantly corrupt dealings of the Clinton Foundation is in order.  When Hillary took the job of secretary of state under President Barack Obama, she promised that the foundation wouldn't accept foreign donations.  It took in money from at least seven foreign governments.  Documents showed that 85 of the 154 private interests who met with Clinton at the State Department had donated money to the foundation.  Emails unearthed by Judicial Watch showed that Clinton's top aide, Huma Abedin — who worked for both the State Department and the foundation — gave "special expedited access to the secretary of state" for those who gave $25,000 to $10 million.

This Is The Washington Post On Crack.  Good thing the media is working to push conservative news sites off social media.  Because we wouldn't want the internet to be dominated by crazy nonsense and lies.  Just serious journalism.  Like this.  ["]Every American family basically pays an $8,000 'poll tax' under the U.S. health system, top economists say - Washington Post["]  This is the Washington Post.  This is the Washington Post on crack.  Does anyone involved in this even know what a poll tax is?  Or what a tax is?  Or what words mean?

Washington Post blasted over column urging journalists to 'reach the undecided' on impeachment.  The Washington Post is taking heat over a column urging journalists to "reach the undecided" in the country who have yet to be swayed on the topic of impeachment.  In a piece titled, "Wall-to-wall impeachment coverage is not changing any minds.  Here's how journalists can reach the undecided," Washington Post media columnist Margaret Sullivan argued Thursday [12/5/2019] that "not much has changed" during the ongoing impeachment inquiry into President Trump in recent weeks despite all the media attention it has received.  "So, is the media coverage pointless?  Are journalists merely shouting into the void?" Sullivan asked.  She later cited Columbia University journalism professor Bill Grueskin, who suggested that journalists have a "movie-trailer approach" to impeachment coverage.

Washington Post changes history to portray pro-life Americans as 'white supremacists'.  Another day, another smear of the tens of millions of American conservatives by a Left-wing 'establishment' news outlet.  Like the rest of the Marxist mainstream media, the Post is stuck on characterizing Caucasian person to the right of Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin as a "white supremacist," and since it must be a slow news cycle, the paper found time to assign a reporter to invent a new line of attack.

Here are the Most Egregious Fake News Stories of 2018.  [#1] The Washington Post blames the Border Patrol for the death of a 7-year-old migrant:  The Washington Post published a story in December focusing on a 7-year-old migrant child from Guatemala who died in border patrol custody.  Despite WaPo's misleading headline suggesting border patrol was to blame for the girl's death, the full timeline of events and statements from the girl's father praising border agents revealed a different story.

WaPo Ran Kavanaugh Story With Knowingly False Information.  The Washington Post falsely suggested that Georgetown Preparatory School was hiring a new employee to deal with fallout from the Kavanaugh hearings, despite the school directly contradicting WaPo's report.  Emily Heil reported on October 18 that Georgetown Prep was hiring a director of alumni relations, and wrote that the school posted the advertisement for the position this week.  The article further suggested that the school was adding the position because of the news surrounding the confirmation of Justice Brett Kavanaugh, a Georgetown Prep alum, to the Supreme Court.  However, Heil was informed prior to publication of her article by a spokesperson for Georgetown Prep that the position was posted back in July.

The Destructive Effects Of The Media's Misleading, Racially Charged Headlines.  When it comes to race and crime or even racially charged incidents, not all headlines are created equal.  "Woman beats a 91-year-old Mexican man with a brick, tells him to 'go back to your country,'" read last Monday's [7/9/2018] Washington Post headline about the brutal anti-Hispanic hate-crime against Rodolfo Rodriguez.  Rodriguez had suffered two broken ribs and a broken cheekbone after accidentally bumping into a child while walking on a sidewalk and being repeatedly attacked by the child's concrete-brick wielding mother.  And if that wasn't enough, the Post reports, several other "young men" came over and kicked the 91-year-old while he was down.  "Go back to your country!" the woman yelled.  It has all the tragic hallmarks of a hate crime, to be sure, except the Washington Post chose not to reveal the race of the perpetrator until the fourth paragraph down, almost as an afterthought (hint:  she was a black woman).  And even after she was arrested, the racial identity of 30-year-old assailant Laquisha Jones remained buried in paragraph four.

WaPo invents quote, then stalls on correction for Nikki Haley:  Any questions as to why people hate the press?  [Scroll down]  Turns out it was the United Nations that made the 250,000 quote, not Haley, and the 250,000 was a figure for extreme poverty, not regular poverty.  Neither the 'extreme,' nor the fact that Haley never said it at all, were gottten right in the original story, quite a two-fer for two reporters to make on the mistake front.  And they ran the bad quote with Haley's picture on their tweet.

Maybe the left should answer some questions instead of Kavanaugh.  Greg Sargent of the Washington Post, Senator Chuck Schumer, and others on the left are trying to trash President Trump's Supreme Court nominee, Brett Kavanaugh, in as many ways possible.  One of their many lines of attack is that Trump knows that Kavanaugh will let Trump off on any potential legal problems, presumably from Special Counsel Robert Mueller.  The first question that Sargent, Schumer, and other leftists of this state of mind should be asked is which law Trump broke.  What's more, how would some garden-variety stealing-or-lying charge, whatever it is, somehow make it to the Supreme Court?  More to the point, how would that cause any Supreme Court justice to let him off?

This Is What a Eulogy for an Establishment Conservative Looks Like.  The Washington Post began an obituary for the late Charles Krauthammer that blamed him for the Iraq War, a bit of a stretch since he's a writer, not a general.  They called him a "neo-conservative provocateur" who helped lead the invasion of Iraq.

The Most Dangerous Aspect of Obamagate.  The party line from the New York Times, the Washington Post, and countless lesser outlets that parrot their "news" stories is that the memo was both a "nothingburger" and a dangerous attempt to undermine federal law enforcement agencies.  Immediately upon its release the Times published a column titled, "Devin Nunes Nothingburger."  Then, 24 hours later, the Gray Lady published another piece under the headline, "The Memo Doesn't Vindicate Trump.  It's More Proof of Obstruction."  The problem here isn't that the fabled "newspaper of record" would have us accept the proposition that the memo proves nothing while also providing proof that the President is guilty of obstructing justice.  The danger is that the media is largely controlled by people who are so committed to a dead statist ideology that they are willing to ignore objective facts and contradict themselves on a day-to-day basis in order to participate in what amounts to a coup attempt against a duly elected President.

The truth about fatal shootings by police.  As it has for the last three years, the Washington Post dedicated a team of data collectors and writers to focus on the issue of fatal shootings by police, producing a long story earlier this month headlined:  "Nationwide, police shot and killed nearly 1,000 people in 2017."  The exact number of such deaths the Post counted was 987.  But rather than supplying any balance or meaningful context to an important topic, the flawed story takes the reader just where discerning people might expect — to the discredited myth that racist police are targeting and gunning down unarmed black men and boys for no reason other than the color of their skin.

No, the Trump Administration Didn't 'Ban' 7 Words at the CDC.  Heads exploded over the weekend in response to a Washington Post article that claimed the Centers for Disease Control would "ban" seven words in all future budget documents submitted to Congress.  The article's inflammatory headline, "CDC gets list of forbidden words:  Fetus, transgender, diversity," set the tone for an egregiously poor example of journalism, even by Washington Post standards.  Science reporter Lena Sun wrote, "the Trump administration is prohibiting officials at the nation's top public health agency from using a list of seven words or phrases — including 'fetus' and 'transgender' — in official documents being prepared for next year's budget."  Support for that explosive charge came from precisely one anonymous source, a CDC analyst who attended an agency briefing on December 14 where the word-ban was allegedly discussed.

Another errant anti-Trump hit piece from the Washington Post.  Fresh off of its triumph in the Alabama Senate race, the Washington Post returns to its primary mission — taking down the President of the United States. [...] The hit piece, by Greg Miller, Greg Jaffe, and Phillip Rucker, takes up five pages in the front section of today's Post.  One searches in vain through the authors' gossip and distortions for evidence of the article's two themes:  (1) that Trump is leaving the U.S. vulnerable to the Russian threat in question, cyber-attacks on our election process and (2) that Trump's policies tilt in favor of Russia.  In support of its first theme, the Post notes that Trump hasn't formed a task force to focus on election hacking or convened a Cabinet-level meeting on the subject.  From this, it wants us to infer that little or nothing is being done to make such hacking more difficult.  The inference is unreasonable.

Flashback: WaPo Document Expert Said Forged Roy Moore Yearbook 'Consistent with One Writer'.  Three weeks ago, in a partisan effort to dismiss what is now an admitted forgery, and what at the time was an obvious forgery, the left-wing Washington Post's Philip Bump consulted former FBI agent Mark Songer, a forensics documents examiner, to examine a yearbook produced by one of Roy Moore's accusers as evidence he assaulted her.  The expert concluded that the "writing seems consistent with one writer."  The context of when Bump published this piece is important.  If you recall, the Washington Post was the news outlet that first broke the story of the Moore allegations, and it was during this time that outside fact-checking of the Post's reporting revealed serious lapses, all them pointing to a Moore accuser who manufactured a false narrative.  But in a Friday morning [12/8/2017] interview on ABC's Good Morning America, Beverly Young Nelson admitted that she had forged a portion of what she still claims (with no credibility) is truly Moore's signature.

Why should we believe the Washington Post?  If Roy Moore committed statutory rape, then he does not belong in the Senate.  But I doubt it is true because the story stems from the Washington Post.  This publication lies — repeatedly.

Alabama ABC Affiliate Can't Find One Voter Who Believes WaPo Report About Roy Moore in Man-on-the-Street Segment.  During a segment that aired on Friday's [11/10/2017] broadcast of Birmingham, AL ABC affiliate WBMA 33/40's 5 p.m. local news, political reporter Lauren Walsh sought out voters in Columbiana, AL to gauge their reactions to the Washington Post report that alleged Republican U.S. Senate hopeful Roy Moore engaged in inappropriate conduct with four teenage girls more than 34 years ago.  None of the respondents according to Walsh told her they believed the Post's reporting.  "It's hard to believe the events that transpired yesterday," Gordon Fluker of nearby Wilsonville, AL said to Walsh about the Washington Post report.  Fluker's response was the standard according to Walsh.  "Out of all the voters we spoke with Friday [11/10/2017] in Columbiana, we didn't find one voter who believed the Washington Post report about Moore," she said.

Judge Roy Moore on Sean Hannity Show: 'We Have Some Evidence of Some Collusion' Against Me in WaPo Smear.  Judge Roy Moore, the GOP nominee for the U.S. Senate in Alabama, told nationally syndicated radio host Sean Hannity on Friday afternoon that his campaign is conducting its own investigation into the allegations against him and has "some evidence of some collusion" against him.

The Truth About One-Sided DACA Reporting.  Over at the Washington Post's Wonkblog, reporter Tracy Jan has a piece entitled, "White House claims 'dreamers' take jobs away from blacks and Hispanics.  Here's the truth."  The truth, according to the immigration advocates interviewed for the article, is that DACA has no undesirable effects whatsoever on the U.S. labor market.  Ms. Jan apparently did not reach out to any immigration skeptics for comment.  Had she done so, they would have told her several things.  First, DACA recipients are not a high-skill group.  The 15 percent of DACA recipients over the age of 21 who have a four-year degree is far from the 34 percent among natives in the same age range.  Furthermore, as Alan Tonelson points out, the occupations held by DACA recipients seem to be primarily working-class.  The idea that they are not competing with less-educated natives, as the advocates in the Wonkblog article claim, is unlikely.  Second, although there is certainly not a fixed number of jobs in our economy, immigration can still negatively affect American workers.

WaPo Fact Checker Misleads on Huma Abedin & the Muslim Brotherhood:  What's the Truth?  It is an undisputed fact that Huma Abedin was an employee of the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs (IMMA) for 12 years, and appeared on the masthead of the organization's journal, the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs (JMMA) right up until the time she began to work at the State Department for Secretary Clinton. [...] Whether one finds it plausible that an individual might be listed as an "associate editor" for a period of 12 years, yet never be called upon to perform the task which their position suggests (i.e. editing) is not a question of fact.  The readers, (Kessler's and ours) will need to determine for themselves whether such an excuse holds water, but a reasonable person might look upon their own life's experience and wonder whether they ever approached a decade or longer in a position without even having seen the work ostensibly produced there during their tenure.

Graham: Comey Didn't Tell Congress the DNC Email That Drove Him to Intervene in Clinton Investigation Was Fake.  Sen. Lindsey Graham (R., S.C.) said Sunday [6/11/2017] that former FBI Director James Comey did not tell lawmakers the email that played a role in his decision to publicly intervene in the Hillary Clinton email investigation was fake, as the FBI reportedly believed.  The Washington Post reported May 24 on a Russian intelligence document the FBI obtained that purported to show a "tacit understanding between the Clinton campaign and the Justice Department" over the investigation into Clinton's email server use.  The FBI, according to the report, believed the document was unreliable and possibly fake.

Trump Maintains Momentum Despite Malicious Media.  I was at a conference in Chicago last week when a friend mentioned that it had just been reported that [Rod] Rosenstein was furious that Trump deployed his memo as the reason to fire Comey and that he was threatening to quit.  Yikes!  Except that Rosenstein did not threaten to quit.  So why did The Washington Post report that he did?  They just made it up.  And they did so out of malice, in an effort to delegitimize Trump.

The Obama-Bezos-CIA-WaPo Link Coincidentally Lurking Behind Those Intel Community Leaks.  [Scroll down]  The rogue officials behind the leaks are from the Obama administration.  You can certainly buy the deduction that they'd know reporters at WaPo, and would, in their unhappiness, "leak scoop" to them.  (Even though it never turns out to actually be anything, other than innuendo.)  But it's really been noticeable that whatever the most sensational claim is, every couple of days or so, it's that claim that ends up being leaked through the Washington Post.

Tips For Reading Washington Post Stories About Trump Based On Anonymous Leaks.  Previous Washington Post stories sourced to anonymous "officials" have fallen apart, including Josh Rogin's January 26 report claiming that "the State Department's entire senior management team just resigned" as "part of an ongoing mass exodus of senior Foreign Service officers who don't want to stick around for the Trump era."  The story went viral before the truth caught up.  As per procedure, the Obama administration had, in coordination with the incoming Trump administration, asked for the resignations of all political appointees.  While it would have been traditional to let them stay for a few months, the Trump team let them know that their services wouldn't be necessary.  The entire story was wrong.

Analyzing the Trump/Russia Intelligence Story.  [Scroll down]  So, let's have a little analytical look at the story.  First of all, every U.S. person in the room denies it, specifically saying no "sources and methods" were disclosed.  Remember that, it's important.  Apparently, the Trump people did report to the NSA and CIA what they talked about with the Russians, and that some of it was highly classified.  Following that, the story was leaked by "current and former U.S. officials," speaking anonymously, of course.  One thing we know — since we know exactly who was in the meeting — is that these "current and former officials" were not in the meeting.

Washington Post Creates Fake News Timed-Release Story Intended to Capture Evening News Lede.  Always remember the basic rule that has been proven accurate 100% of the time:
  •   When the CIA wants to leak a damaging story they coordinate with the Washington Post and ABC.  (and vice-versa).
  •   When the State Dept. or FBI/DOJ wants to leak a damaging story they coordinate with CNN and the New York Times.  (and vice-versa)
This consistent pattern has NEVER been broken.




CNN

Related topics:
CNN's one-sided global warming infomercial, September 4, 2019
CNN's infomercial for homosexuality, October 10, 2019


There's Bad News for CNN Ahead of January Trial Over $1 Billion Defamation Case.  Zachary Young, a former private contractor who facilitated evacuating individuals out of Afghanistan, brought a major defamation lawsuit against CNN.  As we have been reporting, the case against the network for defaming Young's work as "illegal" and "exploitative" by reporter Alex Marquardt and featured on Jake Tapper's show was questioned within the ranks of CNN for lacking proper verification.  Internal communications have indicated a strong slant towards provable malice, which the courts have agreed warrants a jury trial.  In some of the latest rulings ahead of the January 6 trial date, CNN has suffered a series of setbacks in its bid to set the table in its favor.  Understandably, the network lawyers have tried resisting turning over pertinent financial disclosures, as well as arguing to have an expert witness for the plaintiff on probable financial suffering and monetary figures dismissed from the case.  The court denied CNN's efforts in both instances, allowing the case to go before a jury for a ruling on punitive damages.

Jake Tapper and CNN Lose Major Motions in Defamation Case by Navy Veteran.  We previously discussed the defamation lawsuit brought by Navy veteran Zachary Young against CNN and anchor Jake Tapper.  Young has been doing well in court and last week he won on additional major issues against CNN.  In a pair of orders, the jury will be allowed to award punitive damages and his experts would be allowed to be heard by the jury on the damages in the case.  It also found that the Navy veteran was not a public figure and thus is not subject to the higher standard of proof associated with that status.  The punitive damages decision is particularly interesting legally.  It could prove financially onerous for the struggling network, which has plunging ratings and has reduced staff.  The court found that CNN's "retraction" was insufficient to remove punitive damages from the table.

CNN Lets 10-Year Olds Claim People Want To Shoot Them For Being Transgender.  CNN National Correspondent Lucy Kafanov has a rainbow flag emoji in her Twitter handle and was wearing rainbow gloves on Wednesday, but CNN Newsroom still thought she was an appropriate choice to send to the Supreme Court to cover oral arguments in U.S. v. Skrmetti, the case that seeks to answer whether Tennessee's ban on so-called "gender-affirming care" violates the Constitution.  In addition to some horrifically one-sided reporting, Kafanov also sought to shame Tennessee and its supporters by rolling out 10-year-olds who identify as transgender to claim that they are in danger of being murdered.

The Editor says...
Anyone under the age of 15 who is a transvestite, and/or thinks he or she needs a sex-change operation, is only acting that way because he or she has a parent who wants to be somebody on social media.  I never heard of any such cases before 2008.  So-called "smart phones" are one of the worst things that ever happened to this country, because they enable this behavior.  To recap:  The internet + smart phones led to social media.  Social media + vanity + envy + obsession with fame led to fake hate crimes, transgenderism, SWATting, flash mobs, and memes.  All of that stuff combined to produce a society in which self-absorbed loners start at their cell phones for several hours a day when they should be doing something more productive, like driving a car in a straight line.

Scott Jennings Rolls CNN Up in a Blanket, Stomps Out Their Lies When Panel Says Trump May Shoot Americans.  I don't know how he does it.  But here we have another day ending in "y," and it's another day of Republican strategist Scott Jennings having to put out multiple fireballs of misinformation on a CNN panel.  It's nearly impossible to follow the bouncing ball of lies being told by multiple panel participants in this segment, but we'll try.  The entire trainwreck of a segment begins with left-wing social media content creator Leigh McGowan stating her belief that President-elect Donald Trump will be "sending the military into blue states to make them behave."  "What are you talking about?" an incredulous Jennings responds.

Here Come the Meltdowns Over Trump's FBI Director Pick, Kash Patel.  Meet the United States' new FBI director:  Kash Patel, a game-changing former lawyer, investigator, and an "America first fight" who will promote transparency, declassify information, expose deep state criminals, dismantle human trafficking cartels, and so much more. [...] However, just minutes after Trump announced his nomination of Patel for the high-ranking role, liberal media have already combusted.  As the news broke, CNN quickly brought on a California Congressman to go on a freakout monologue about how Patel would go after journalists without a reason.  For five consecutive minutes, the CNN panel ranted about a so-called Trump dictatorship while just flipping through photos of Patel, who they described as a "loyalist," in the background.  The outlet continuously claimed that Patel would target political opponents without acknowledging what the current Biden-Harris Department of Justice has been doing for the past four years.

CNN Did a Segment on a 'Controversial' Trump Supporter.  There's Only One Problem.  [Scroll down]  Activist Scott Presler decided to take things up a notch to ensure a Trump win: take on the herculean task of chipping away at the Democrats' voter registration advantage in Pennsylvania.  He moved there and began a sustained campaign of voter registration drives, which whittled down the Democrats' dominance in the voter rolls.  It paid off.  Not only did Trump win Pennsylvania, but he also won all-important Bucks County for the first time in 30-plus years.  So, CNN did a segment on Presler, which he described as a hatchet job.  The best part is that the network labeled him "controversial" because he registered an army of Republicans and beat the Democrats at their own game:  [Video clip]  [Tweet with (the same?) video clip]

Top Stars at CNN on Chopping Block as Network May Fire Hundreds After Trump Landslide Victory.  The legacy media is dead.  Top stars at fake news CNN are on the chop as the network mulls firing hundreds after Trump won the 2024 presidential election.  According to Nielsen ratings obtained by Mediaite, both MSNBC and CNN have seen their ratings tank after last week's Trump landslide election.  "Insiders told Puck the new round of firings will likely see on-air talent like them affected, as the network's new CEO looks to free up finances amid waning ratings[,]" Puck News reported.

Federal Court Backs 2nd CNN Defamation Case, Calls Out Aversion to Truth.  Loose lips sink ships and apparently CNN's loose relationship with the truth could sink the Cable News Network.  In a truly scathing concurring opinion published Thursday breathing new life into Project Veritas' defamation case against the liberal news network, Judge Ed Carnes with the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals called out CNN for "downplaying the importance of telling the truth in its broadcasts" and used CNN's own employees to do it.  The case involves CNN lying about what got right-wing investigative journalism organization Project Veritas kicked off of then-Twitter.  CNN falsely claimed they were banned from the platform (before Elon Musk bought it) for spreading misinformation when, in reality, they were banned for posting someone's address; in violation of Twitter's rules.  Those are two very different reasons, but as Judge Carnes pointed out from CNN's filing, CNN calls that an "immaterial detail" of the story.  In the opening paragraph of his concurring opinion, Judge Carnes seemed disgusted with CNN and ruling that the case should proceed[.]

"I Was Wrong": CNN Panelist Retracts Trump-Cheney "Firing Squad" Propaganda.  After the MSM spent the day in histrionics peddling the falsehood that Trump said Liz Cheney should face a firing squad, when he was simply calling her a chickenhawk, CNN panelist Jonah Goldberg offered a mea culpa, and has retracted his claim that Trump called for Cheney's execution.  "This morning on CNN I referred to Trump's "rifles" quote as him advocating a 'firing squad' for Liz Cheney," said Goldberg.  "I was wrong to say he was calling for a firing squad execution.  After I said that, my co-panelist, Brad Todd made the case that I was wrong."  "I let my disgust at Trump's comments get the better of me as this was the first time I'd heard them."

CNN Commentator Says White People Who Don't Vote For Kamala Harris Need to Be Held Accountable.  CNN commentator and co-host of 'Native Land Pod,' Angela Rye, said white people who don't vote for Kamala Harris need to be held accountable.  This should win over the white vote!  In 2016, white non-Hispanic voters preferred Trump over Hillary Clinton 58% to 37%, according to the exit poll conducted by Edison Research for the National Election Pool.  In 2020, white non-Hispanic voters preferred Trump over Biden 58% to 41%, according to Roper Center for Public Opinion Research.

The Editor says...
The presidential election is conducted with a secret ballot for just this reason — so the losing party won't hold anyone "accountable."  This concept was universally understood until the public schools stopped teaching civics and history and good citizenship.

CNN fearmongers about Antarctica greening at an 'alarming' rate.  A new "climate change" article from CNN, like all the continuous articles on the weather, storms, or warming, is meant to scare people into capitulating into completely changing their way of life.  The media just regurgitates what they are told without asking questions or doing research, pushing the green agenda to confiscate more money and power for the government.  Our freedom and prosperity are at risk because of this agenda. [...] Yes, it was warm in Antarctica in 2022, which is all of the actual scientific data that this article had to offer.  But, it was also extremely cold; April of that year saw an all time record low:  ["] [...] The temperature dropped to -76.8 °C (-106.2 °F), a rare temperature for mid-April, said climatologist Maximiliano Herrera.["]  Somehow though, the researchers and reporters also didn't mention that in 2021, just one year before the 2022 figures cited for warming, Antarctica had the coldest six months on record; also reported by CNN: [...]

Mark Robinson Files Defamation Suit against CNN over 'Black Nazi' Story.  North Carolina lieutenant governor Mark Robinson filed a defamation lawsuit against CNN over an article the network published connecting the Republican gubernatorial nominee to numerous salacious race and sex-related comments posted on a porn site years ago, his campaign announced at a Tuesday morning news conference in Raleigh.  Robinson has categorically denied the contents of the report, which connects him to a username that identified as a "black Nazi" and defended slavery on a porn-site messaging board years ago, among other unsavory posts.  The report prompted the Republican Governors Association to stop reserving ads on his behalf, as National Review first reported last month, and also resulted in an exodus of staffers from his campaign team as well as his official lieutenant governor's office.  Privately, Republicans say the race is now Democratic attorney general John Stein's to lose.

CNN Web Content to Go Behind Paywall.  Well, if The New York Times is correct, the number of people seeing CNN content will get asymptotically close to zero soon.  The ailing network is struggling, and in an attempt to shore up its revenues, it will experiment with putting its content behind a paywall, making people kick in real money to access its content.  It's a move I understand on an intellectual level.  The revenue streams in media these days are few, with the vast majority going to social media which scoops up the content and feeds it to people while grabbing the dollars for the eyeballs.  And as much as we hate the fact that content costs money to produce, the fact is that content costs money to produce. [...] Unfortunately, with the exception of a couple of personalities, nobody wants what they are selling.  90% of the content they put out is dreck.

The Editor says...
As Regis Philbin used to say, "Who kez?"

CNN Admits to Using 'Digitally Altered' Photos of Donald Trump, Laura Loomer.  CNN issued an on-air retraction and admitted to using "digitally altered" photos of former President Donald Trump and right-wing activist and influencer Laura Loomer.  In a post on X, Loomer shared a video of CNN issuing a retraction after CNN hosts, such as Anderson Cooper, used a "digitally altered" photo of Trump and Loomer in "a number of segments" on Friday and Saturday.  "Friday evening and on Saturday, CNN aired a number of segments that briefly showed an image of former President Donald Trump and Laura Loomer taken from social media," the CNN host said. "On review, this image had been digitally altered by a third party and should not have been included.  We regret the error.["]

The Editor says...
No, they only regret getting caught.

Dana Bash Claims Second Would-Be Assassin's 'Anti-Trump Posts' Have 'Nothing To Do With Kamala Harris And Joe Biden'.  CNN's Dana Bash on Monday claimed that former President Donald Trump's attempted assassination suspect Ryan Wesley Routh's anti-Trump social media posts have no relation to Vice President Kamala Harris and President Joe Biden.  Trump accused Harris and Biden in a Monday Fox News Digital interview of espousing "rhetoric" that he claimed is contributing to the attempts on his life.  Bash, on "CNN Newsroom with Wolf Blitzer," noted that both Harris and Biden have said they are grateful Trump was unscathed after the second attempt and dismissed any suggestion that they influenced Routh, despite his posts, including one mirroring their repeated claim that "democracy is on the ballot," according to reports.

CNN puts 'live' banner on pre-recorded Harris-Walz interview.  CNN displayed a live banner during the entirety of anchor Dana Bash's pre-taped exclusive Thursday interview with Vice President Kamala Harris and her running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz.  Bash made it apparent at the start of the broadcast that the interview with Harris and Walz had been recorded earlier on Thursday and was not airing live.  It was Harris' first sit-down interview since launching her 2024 presidential campaign on July 21 and aired exclusively on CNN at 9 p.m., with Bash providing live commentary on location in Georgia throughout the broadcast.  [Tweet]

So what really was witheld from CNN's 41-minute interview with Kamala Harris?  Is CNN a news network or a public relations agency?  What else can one conclude but the latter, now that we learn that CNN did a 41-minute interview with Democrat presidential nominee Kamala Harris, but only released 18 minutes of it to the public, both in its broadcast and in its transcript.  That was its big news scoop, the first major interview of Kamala Harris since Joe Biden was forced to pull out of the race last month.  For a news agency to withold ... the news ... is strange stuff indeed, given that news is supposed to be what it does, and its bread and butter. [...] Now we get a purported leak as to the reason why:  [Advertisement]  [Tweet]  So we learn that Harris's undoubtedly mangled and contradictory responses to questions about fracking were a mess, meaning, CNN was running cover for her in order to make her look better than she really was.  Worse still, CNN apparently gave Harris veto power over what went into the CNN interview and what didn't.  That's the biggest no-no in news.  That's not news, that's serving a client.

Bill Maher:  Conservatives Have a Point About CNN's News Coverage.  You all know Maher is an anti-Trump liberal, but the comedian is also not insane.  There are times when he must remind his audience that he thinks Trump is a terrible human being because, for a large chunk of this season, he's attacked Democrats and liberals more for their nonsense from transgender sex change surgeries, mask-wearing, and child predators invading Nickelodeon and Disney.  He's decidedly anti-woke.  Once again, Maher nailed it on CNN, which is supposed to have unbiased news coverage.  Collins was recently on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, where the audience erupted into laughter when the host said that she works for a middle-of-the-road news network — everyone knows that's nonsense, even Maher.

CNN beclowns itself and says the markets yearn for Kamala.  According to most of the media, the Democratic National Convention is so "electrifying," and pure "joy[.]"  The journalists have clearly received their talking points from the DNC, or they wouldn't all be using the same words.  The Democrats have been telling us how great Joe Biden was for three-and-a-half years, until we saw him in the debate, even calling him "sharp as a tack."  They told us that Kamala was weak and unpopular, and an albatross around Joe's neck.  Now, she is the greatest thing since sliced bread, despite running away from her record and Biden's policies as fast as she can, because she knows they're losers.  Here is CNN telling us that Wall Street is gravitating toward her, and it's clearly our turn to cackle when we read a headline and article like this: ["]How Kamala Harris is winning over Wall Street [...] ["]  There is just so much to love!  Let's blame corporations for greed and gouging when they make a small profit, instead of big government spending and regulations.

Police officer fights for his life due to violent unrest fanned by false CNN reports.  Through deceptive coverage, CNN fans racial unrest and incites rioting in places like Ferguson.  Then CNN reports on the violence it incites, which brings it more ad revenue.  CNN's deception recently bore fruit when a police officer was attacked by protesters in Ferguson, suffering a "severe brain injury" that may result in his death.  Ferguson is the place where Michael Brown attacked a police officer in 2014, and attempted to take his gun, which resulted in the police officer shooting Brown in self-defense.  The police officer was later cleared by both local prosecutors and the progressive Civil Rights Division of the Obama Justice Department.  But CNN peddled the lie that Brown was shot with his hands up, saying "don't shoot."  As Newsbusters notes, "'Hands Up, Don't Shoot Never Happened," even though "news outlets, left-wing blogs and liberal politicians joined in advancing the false narrative," such as when "CNN panelists held their hands up in solidarity with protesters" falsely claiming that Brown was shot with his hands up.

CNN [is] Effectively Worthless After Parent Warner Bros Takes $9.1 Billion Writedown.  What had been obvious "to the rest of us" for years, is finally official:  late last night, shares of Warner Bros.  Discovery, the parent of CNN and TNT, crashed 10% to the lowest level on record after it reported dire results, which missed across the board and plunged across every income statement category... [Illustration] ...but the biggest hit — and surprise — was the company's stunning $9.1 billion charge taken to write down the value of its traditional TV networks, such as CNN and TNT, which were acquired in 2022 when Warner Bros Discovery was created as part of its acquisition of WarnerMedia.  The write down confirmed that legacy cable channels like CNN and TNT are no longer worth what they were when the $42 billion merger was completed.  In fact, judging by the ongoing mass layoffs at the former, one can argue that CNN's value is now negative and will continue to be so until it stops hemorrhaging cash.

Trump's Courage and Biden's Failures.  [Scroll down]  Nevertheless, until the Trump-Biden televised debate, many of the pundits on mainstream media including those on CNN and MSNBC, continually denied the fragility and lack of coherence of our President.  After the debate, a large panel of commentators appeared on CNN to analyze and comment on the debate.  All without exception claimed to be shocked and dismayed by Pres.  Biden's performance.  Van Jones, a member of the post-debate panel, described Biden's performance as "painful." In short, the post-debate panel did a complete about face on the issue of Biden's communication skills and competence as the top elected official in this country. [...] Not one word was uttered by anyone about having made mistakes in denying Biden's lack of acuity for more than three years.  Not one word was uttered by anyone portraying Trump in a positive light.  The entire focus was on Biden's lack of clarity, lack of focus, and upon his significant cognitive decline.  Trump received no compliments for his clarity, goals, or manifest leadership qualities during the debate.

CNN Caught Lying About Disbanding 'Race and Equity' Team.  CNN, a far-left propaganda outlet that spreads conspiracy theories and violence, tried to lie its way out of the awesome news that it had disbanded its stupid "race and equity" reporting team.  Disgraced CNN CEO Mark Thompson is hoping to restructure his failing Hate Outlet into something sustainable by adding on some kind of a subscription "lifestyle journalism" service.  The far-left New York Times has successfully funded its news lies and propaganda with puzzles, recipes, and travel tips.  CNNLOL is hoping it can do the same.

Supreme Court's Trump immunity ruling is what the body was designed for — unpopular but constitutionally correct.  Within minutes of the Supreme Court's decision on presidential immunity, liberal politicians and pundits seemed to move from hyperbole to hyperventilation.  When not breathing into paper bags, critics predicted, again, the end of the republic.  CNN's Van Jones declared that it was "almost a license to thug, in a way." [...] Jones warned the justices that "politically it's bad" for them to rule this way.  The comment captures the misguided analysis of many media outlets.  The Supreme Court was designed to be unpopular; to take stands that are politically unpopular but constitutionally correct.  Indeed, the Democrats have become the very threat that the court was meant to resist.  Recently, senators demanded that Chief Justice John Roberts appear to answer to them for his own decisions.  (Roberts wisely declined.)

The Editor says...
This is the first time I've seen thug used as a verb.  Using a noun as a verb doesn't make it a verb.

Rep. Matt Gaetz Points Out CNN's Dana Bash Used Hand Signals During Debate.  Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) recently shared a video that shows CNN's Dana Bash giving hand signals during the Trump-Biden debate.  In a post on X, Gaetz shared the video and wrote, "Dana Bash, what are you doing?"  In the video, Bash, who moderated the debate, can be seen pointing to her right in the direction of Joe Biden.  Many users on X, speculated that Bash's move was to alert Biden that it was his turn to speak.

What to Expect from the Presidential 'Debate'.  [Scroll down]  Speaking of journalistic duties, shouldn't the Clinton News Network be expected to apologize for pushing the Clinton-Obama Russia Hoax for so many years before being rewarded with a national debate?  Shouldn't CNN apologize for falsely claiming that Hunter Biden's "laptop from Hell" was "Russian disinformation" in the lead-up to the 2020 election?  CNN has a documented record of committing fraud against the American people and interfering in elections.

CNN Could Be Forced to Pay Upwards of $1 Billion from Defamation Suit from Tapper Show.  The case may not be as well known (yet), but CNN could be facing a defamation liability rivaling or exceeding the $787 million Fox News paid out to Dominion Voting Systems.  NewsBusters recently reported on Florida's First District Court of Appeals affirming that plaintiff Zachary Young could seek punitive damages, in addition to economic and emotional damages, from the Cable News Network in a civil trial after they allegedly defamed him regarding his work in getting people out of Afghanistan.  The total could near or exceed $1 billion.  For that outcome to be remotely in the cards, Young needed to prove malice and according to the ruling, he's done exactly that.  "Young sufficiently proffered evidence of actual malice, express malice, and a level of conduct outrageous enough to open the door for him to seek punitive damages," Judge L. Clayton Roberts wrote in the court's ruling.

Gretchen Whitmer Conveniently 'Loses Connection' When Asked Awkward Question About Hunter Biden.  Michigan Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer proved over the weekend that her party will engage in whatever antics it needs to, even if that means dodging questions about Hunter Biden while hypocritically shredding former President Donald Trump as a "convicted felon."  Whitmer appeared on a segment of CNN's "State of the Union" with Dana Bash on Sunday.  When asked about Biden's felony trial for allegedly lying on a federal gun form that asked if he was addicted to drugs in 2018, the governor unconvincingly indicated she couldn't hear Bash. [...] Some astute observers noted Whitmer peered off camera at the 18-second mark in the clip above when the question about Biden was being asked, causing speculation about how deliberate this connection issue was.

Why Did CNN Say the Israeli Hostages Were 'Released?'.  This is a story of two contrasting headlines.  When Karen wrote about the rescue of four Israeli hostages by the IDF, she said "IDF Heroes Rescue Four Israeli Hostages Still Alive."  However, CNN initially took a very different approach during a segment featuring Victor Blackwell and Ian Bremmer.  A chyron appeared during the segment declaring, "Gantz postpones news conference after hostage release." Pardon me?  Did you say... "release?"  Hamas didn't release anyone.  The IDF undertook a bloody, dangerous mission to retrieve those four hostages and slay the monsters who had been holding them as prisoners and terrorizing them for eight months.  One soldier died as a result of the effort.  The only people "released" were the souls of the Hamas terrorists who are no doubt currently on their way to rot in hell.  The New York Post noted that plenty of people "pounced" on CNN's blunder.

The economic indicators' used by the media elite.  David Chalian, political director for CNN, can't understand for the life of him why the economy is still "front and center" for most Americans, because there are other things that Joe Biden "performs worse on."  (Are there though?)  On a recent CNN segment, Chalian was caught scoffing at the stupid rubes ("Americans") who "disapprove" of Biden's handling of the economy, because these uneducated flyover saps pay more attention to how they're feeling rather than the "economic indicators and data" that all the media elite "report on constantly."  [Tweet with video clip] [...] Those "feelings" that Chalian's talking about aren't really feelings, but legitimate indicators of where the economy is, and ones with which we interact constantly; here are just a few examples: [...]

CNN beclowns itself by confirming the escalating cost-of-living crisis while trying to pin it on Trump.  A recent article from Matt Egan at CNN admits that Americans have a problem paying for things... but neither he, nor any of the outlet's other employees ever bring up Joe Biden or his policies as a significant cause of the problem; [...] Egan says the problem has been building for years instead of admitting that inflation didn't start increasing rapidly until Biden took office.  Despite COVID and supply chain issues, inflation remained below 2%... until Biden.  The economy was growing rapidly pre-Biden, despite the entire country having come to a screeching halt over a virus, yet he signed the $2 trillion American Rescue Plan, and fulfilled his campaign promise to destroy affordable energy (oil), which sent prices skyrocketing.  He compounded the inflation problem by issuing executive orders to open the borders: housing, food, education, healthcare, law enforcement, energy, and other things are obviously strained when millions of people are suddenly thrown into the mix, bringing no wealth and anti-American cultures and ethos.  The federal budget is around 60% higher than before COVID, and they are borrowing trillions each year.  That obviously puts pressure on prices and forces an increase in interest rates.  Here's how Egan framed it though, to distract from the obvious:  ["]From the historically unaffordable housing market and budget-breaking day care rates to high car prices, the United States has a cost of living problem many years in the making.["]

Keepin' the logic fluffy and the spin immoral at CNN.  Watching CNN is a bit like watching someone who locked their keys in a convertible — with the top down — except that it's less watchable, and not nearly as fun or funny outside of the irony of the "most trusted name in news" lying like Pinocchio all day, every day. [...] It's not even news, it's "news" (fictionalized current events themed advocacy based programming).  CNN doesn't make it up as they go, they are fed an endless steaming pile of narrative, and they just regurgitate it.

Just think of the list of flat-out lies that Democrats told about the Trump Administration.
  [#1]   A small but blindingly bright marquee example was "Koi-gate," which even NPR had to admit was a garbage take by CNN and a fair mob of others.  President Trump and (the now late) Prime Minister Abe each dumped a box of fish food in a koi pond in Japan, but the media focused only on Trump and spun what he did as a "world stage" blunder.  On the face of it, it's a petty attack in the grand scheme of things, but even light scrutiny reveals it as notably egregious, as the live video was broadcast worldwide.
  [#2]   Then there was the alleged collusion between Wikileaks and Don Jr.  Once again, "The Most Trusted Name in News," CNN, carried the ball. [...]
  [#3]   The New York Times and many, many other outlets reported that Trump cruelly caged illegal immigrant children.  From this emerged one of Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY)'s most iconic and heavily memed photographs.  Oops.  The inhumanity ascribed to Trump was actually from the Obama era.  And while we're on the subject, one of Time Magazine's most memed covers came from yet another illegal immigrant child story gone, shall we say, fabululistly wrong.
  [#4]   The so-called "Steele Dossier" was a real biggie. [...]
  [#5]   And finally, Paul Manafort allegedly "sharing" polling information with the Russians?  Yeah, that never happened.

CNN Appears on the Verge of an Epic Collapse.  CNN has been desperately treading water for years now.  The former king of cable news has been bleeding ratings for years, with Fox News typically topping all the networks night after night.  CNN still fancies itself the "most trusted name in news," yet, even former CEO Chris Licht admitted last year that that trust — assuming at one point they actually had it — is long gone and they need to restore it.  He didn't last long.  The problem, of course, is that CNN claims to be fair and without bias, yet anti-conservative views have long been part of its DNA, as the network's on-air talent routinely bases its reports on Democratic Party talking points.  Even token conservatives on the network are a joke, and sound more like liberal pundits.  The struggling network is now desperately trying to get out of its death spiral, and step one is to cut costs by axing the remaining big name talents who have extremely large salaries.

Migrant Gang Rape Of Child In Italy Prompts CNN To Worry About "Far-Right".  After a group of migrants gang-raped a 13-year-old girl in Italy, CNN responded by expressing concern about how it might help the "far-right."  Yes, really.  The girl was raped in front of her boyfriend in a public park in the Sicilian city of Catania.  The seven suspects are all Egyptian migrants and three were under the age of 18.  In reporting the story, CNN's main focus was to worry about how the incident, which is just "the latest in a string of shocking sexual attacks in the country," might increase political support for the right-wing.  [Tweet]

CNN Falsely Implies SCOTUS Banned Texas From Installing Razor Wire.  CNN's Dana Bash solemnly lamented on Friday's [1/26/2024] Inside Politics that Texas Gov. Greg Abbott is in defiance of a recent Supreme Court ruling regarding razor wire at the border there was just one problem: the Court never said the wire was illegal.  What the Court did was remove an injunction that prohibited federal authorities from removing the wire while the underlying case is litigated.  Theoretically, the feds could remove the wire, do whatever it is they need to do, leave, and Texas could put the wire right back, but Bash warned, "Texas is ignoring the highest court in the land.  This week the Supreme Court ruled that the Biden Administration has the legal authority to remove razor wire along the Southern border, but the Lone Star State governor doesn't care and is blocking federal agents from accessing it."

CNN [is] Not Even Hiding [its] Anti-Gun Agenda Anymore.  The CNN of today isn't doing groundbreaking reporting that literally no one else could do.  Instead, they're pushing an agenda.  In fairness, this isn't new, but with the DOJ report on Uvalde coming out last week, one would think they'd at least focus on what the report actually said.  It outlined law enforcement failures that led to the death of so many innocent children.  That ain't what CNN is pushing, though. [...] Now, we've seen this kind of thing from supposed journalists before.  Anti-gun voices on the news get to say pretty much whatever they want, unchallenged, while anyone who opposes gun control finds themselves in a debate with the host.  This isn't new by any stretch.  Further, it's also just one program on CNN.  One could easily dismiss this as simply a single program or producer or some other entity rather than the network as a whole.  One should not.

The climate doomsayers' cooked up coffee crisis.  Popular things easily recognized — even cherished — by people are continually identified as being at risk of being damaged or destroyed by climate change.  Coffee, for example, is a commodity experiencing a surge in popularity, and there are no prizes for guessing what climate doomsayers are saying now.  Yes, coffee is now said to be under threat from man-made climate change.  CNN, in a recent article, made this statement:  "climate change poses a huge threat to the coffee business and to farmers."  Keeping with its customary approach of presenting climate change as a threat to all manner of things, CNN quotes the Inter-American Development Bank as warning that "rising temperatures will reduce the area suitable for growing coffee by up to 50%."  Is this claim true?

The Comical Democrat-Media January 6 Storyline for Election Year 2024 Carries On.  As election year 2024 begins, the Democrat "News"-media Colluders (DNC) roll out their free campaign commercials for the Democrats.  One of these, featuring a clip CNN's Phil Mattingly, is found in an article titled "'There's The Truth and There Are Lies!' CNN Anchor Destroys Republicans Over Trump-Inspired Riot in Blistering Commentary."  Unfortunately, the arguments in the article and clip are literally terrible, containing demonstrably false information, and provide no direct evidence whatsoever that Trump intended an insurrection.  None!

CNN Report on Claudine Gay Resignation — This Spin You Have to Watch to Believe.  There are times when the words that come from the mouth of the Moonbats at CNN just need to be emphasized, so we can all laugh.  This is one of those times.  Appearing on CNN to discuss the resignation of Harvard President Claudine Gay, "journalist" Matt Egan takes parsel-tongue spin to new levels of professional obfuscation.  During his review of Gay's plagiarism, Mr. Egan notes Mrs. Gay has not been "accused of stealing ideas," she has been accused of "copying other people's writing without attribution."  Yes, he actually said that.

Why The Sudden Media Interest In The Biden Border Crisis?  After spending three years largely ignoring the border, the mainstream press is suddenly all over it, with headlines blaring about a "surge," "crisis" and "call for action."  Why now?  Last week CNN reported that a "December migrant surge" at the southern border was the "largest in more than two decades."  Several other news outlets used similar language.  The New York Times warned that "surging" Mexico border crossings "push U.S. resources to the brink."  In another story, CNN even described the situation as a "crisis."  Weirdly, the press is even exaggerating the current "surge."  Consider that CNN story, which says:  "Border authorities encountered more than 225,000 migrants along the U.S.-Mexico border this month, marking the highest monthly total recorded since 2000, according to preliminary Homeland Security statistics shared with CNN."  Except that's not true.  According to U.S. Customs and Border Protection data, illegal crossings exceeded 225,000 in August, September, October, and November of this year, and in six previous months since President Joe Biden took office.  As a matter of fact, illegal crossings have averaged more than 200,000 since Biden moved into the White House.

An infomercial masquerading as news:
CNN Wrapped a News Segment about Barbie's Economic Impact in a Commercial for the Film's Streaming Debut.  CNN reported on Friday that Barbie was streaming on Max — in an alleged news segment that was pretty obviously a commercial for another Warner Bros.  Discovery property.  While Barbie was a runaway success at the box office in 2023 and a feminist pop culture phenomenon, that's not what the segment on CNN This Morning was about.

So — It Wasn't the Sidewalk After All.  This week the Ventura County Sheriff arrested Professor Loay Abdelfattah Alnaji in the death of Paul Kessler, a 69 year-old man who had been standing on the sidewalk peacefully supporting Israel.  Alnaji, who bashed Kessler with a megaphone, was charged with involuntary manslaughter and battery causing serious bodily injury and both these charges contain special allegations that Alnaji "personally inflicted great bodily injury."  This comes as no surprise to most of us who get their news online but it must have been news to those who read headers which said he died after falling and hitting his head on the sidewalk.  Even after no charges were brought against the sidewalk, CNN's header read "arrest made in death of Jewish protestor who fell and hit his head."  (CNN has now stealthily edited the header.)  The media effort to downplay anti-Semitism, like its coverage of the Israeli response to the butchery by Hamas, doesn't seem fixable.  It's certainly bias, but stupidity also plays a part, as is demonstrated by their claims that they didn't know the Gaza stringers were Hamas or the scenes of injured civilians in Gaza were Pallywood.

How Dumb is CNN?  Legacy media outlets are so grotesquely biased that it is easy to forget how incompetent they are, as well.  [Tweet with screenshot of CNN map of Israel]  They've got Tel Aviv on the Golan Heights, and Sderot, which is frequently in the news for being attacked by Gazan rockets, on the West Bank.  I think it is a matter of common knowledge that Tel Aviv is on the Mediterranean.  Would CNN produce a map showing Istanbul in the middle of Asia Minor?  Or Venice up in the Dolomites?  I don't know, maybe they would.  I know good help is hard to find, but how do you hire someone to situate cities on a map who doesn't actually look at a map?

CNN praises the IRS for 'cracking down' on tax cheats; fails to realize they just described Hunter Biden.  CNN operatives can't really be so naïve that they actually believe the IRS wouldn't have been able to collect these taxes without passing the falsely named "Inflation Reduction Act" can they? [...] Hunter Biden failed to pay taxes some years, and allegedly raided his own daughter's college savings account to pay for prostitutes (and who knows what else). This behavior certainly constitutes fraud, but the IRS and the (In)Justice Department have been extremely soft on him.  He is the son of a Democrat president, therefore, he is special.  The media and other Democrats have known how Joe enabled his family to collect kickbacks around the world because of his powerful political position and really don't [care]. [...] Incidentally, there is no statute of limitations for people like Hunter who intentionally commit criminal tax evasion.  So why are the prosecutors acting like there is?  Why is the public intentionally being misinformed?

CNN's claims about Gaza are loaded with canards.  Here is an obvious one:  CNN claims Gaza is an "open air prison" with, by implication, Israel the oppressive jailer.  But Gaza is not an "open-air prison" as CNN reporters have said several times on their programming.  If it's an open-air prison, how do they explain the thousands of rockets, drones, attack boats, para gliders, automatic rifles, and other sophisticated equipment that the Hamas terrorists were able to bring in?  Does a prison exist where it is possible to sneak in that kind of weaponry?  Doesn't CNN understand that they are aiding and abetting not to mention inflaming pro-terrorist supporters with their terrorist-supportive rhetoric?  And each time CNN claims Israel has a barrier between it and Gaza (they call it a blockade), they should remember to include Egypt as doing the same, reminding their viewers that Israel placed barriers up to protect from incidences that they sadly were unable to stop this past week.  The original barriers were only put up after the Palestinian terrorism began.

CNN, with John Kelly's help, resurrects the lie that Trump insulted America's veterans.  The old adage is that a lie will travel halfway around the world before the truth gets its pants (or boots) on.  That's what CNN and former Trump White House Chief of Staff John Kelly are counting on because they're resurrecting debunked claims that Trump attacked America's veterans and those who died in battle.  After all, as the late, unlamented Harry Reid said in 2012 after lobbing charges against Mitt Romney that he knew were false, helping to keep Mitt out of the White House, "Romney didn't win, did he?"  John Kelly is another member of the military cadre that turned so hard against Donald Trump, despite having served as Donald Trump's Secretary of Homeland Security and Chief of Staff.

Can You Spot The Difference Between The Menendez And Biden Foreign Influence Scandals?  [Scroll down]  A number of astute people noted how CNN was credulous to the point of absurdity, but near as I can tell, no one has yet noted that CNN's "fact check" needs... a fact check.  "On the allegation that these dinners with Joe Biden 'resulted in cars,' [Hunter Biden business partner Devon] Archer said the businessman Rakishev wired Hunter Biden the exact amount of money that Hunter used to buy a Porsche.  This car has nothing to do with Joe Biden," notes CNN.  To start, the $142,300 wasn't used to buy a Porsche — it was used to buy a Fisker Karma, an EV sports car made by an automotive start-up that got $192 million in loans from the Department of Energy to, among other things, take over an abandoned General Motors factory in Wilmington, Delaware, which is coincidentally the Bidens' hometown.  Fisker defaulted on those massive loans, costing American taxpayers $132 million, and Hunter later traded the Karma for a Porsche.

CNN Gets Roasted for Absurd Chyron Warning Constitution is 'Outdated, Puts Democracy at Risk'.  The few remaining viewers of CNN got a remarkable dose of news on Saturday.  Just in time for Constitution Day, CNN's dwindling audience learned that the Consitution of the United States — the oldest written government charter in the world and the document that gave birth to the nation that has spread democracy around the globe — has become so "outdated" that it's actually a "threat to democracy."  Of course, that's democracy as CNN's scholars understand it.  And you can't spell ignorance without "C-N-N."

CNN wants you to panic over COVID despite a lack of data.  It seems like we're beginning to detect a pattern here.  Joe Biden recently announced that he would be requesting funding for yet another vaccine intended to combat the latest strains of COVID making the rounds.  But public interest in the experimental vaccines has declined sharply this year, to put it charitably.  So the legacy media seems to be gearing up to see if they can get everyone into a panic over some sort of resurgence of the pandemic.  One example of that trend showed up at CNN yesterday, with an unsubtle title reading, "It seems like everyone has COVID-19.  Here's why this wave is probably worse than official data suggests."  That came as a surprise to me, since I hadn't been hearing much of anything locally suggesting that there were more COVID patients than usual, though there clearly have been cases showing up around the country and possibly even a couple of new variants.

CNN's claim that Trump's team hacked Georgia voting systems is belied by its facts.  Fani Willis, the Fulton County, Georgia, District Attorney, is seemingly intent upon being the next Alvin Bragg, as she busily puts together an indictment based on questionable facts, currently mysterious legal theories, and, most importantly, leaks to the media.  It's the last that concerns us today because CNN is very excited:  On January 7, the outlet strongly imply, Donald Trump's team, everyone from Rudy Guiliani to Sidney Powell, hacked into, or oversaw someone else hacking into, the Coffee County election software.  Except that, according to CNN itself, that's not what happened.

CNN analyst:  Donald Trump is Osama bin Laden II.  Hating Donald Trump is a valuable skill if you have the right connections.  It can open doors, bring you riches and fame, and induce presumably intelligent people to idolize you and hang on to your every word.  Michael Fanone, a retired DC police officer has used his hatred of Trump in just such a manner.  He is the co-author of a self-aggrandizing book and a regular CNN contributor.  Why is he on CNN?  He hates Trump and blames his own injuries from the riot on him.  He appeared on CNN yesterday in order to declare Donald Trump a terrorist comparable to Osama bin Laden, and even his interviewer seemed a bit surprised by the comparison.  I don't know why, since Trump has been compared to the Nazis many times, so why not throw in some good ol' al Qeada terrorists as well?

CNN Anguishes Over 81-Year-Old McConnell's Health, Ignores Same Issues With 80-Year-Old Biden.  In yet another example of why embattled CNN continues to swirl down the ratings toilet, CNN News Central on Thursday featured a laughable segment about 81-year-old Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell's age and health issues following an earlier moment when he stopped speaking during a press event.  Host John Berman and congressional correspondent Manu Raju talked about the incident at length, pointing to McConnell's past falls and suggesting complications might make him incapable of carrying out his senatorial responsibilities.  Just one problem.  80-year-old Joe Biden has also fallen multiple times, tripped while walking up staircases, mumbled incoherently on numerous occasions, and abruptly started wandering around on the stage in the middle of making public comments — and CNN, self-anointed as "The Most Trust Name in News," has ignored every minute of it.

Washington is gaslighting on "climate change".  Baby, it's hot outside.  Right on cue, a New York Times headline links this surge in temperatures to "climate change." [...] We had multiple ice ages and heat waves long before we had coal mines, gas-guzzling automobiles and air conditioning.  Or human-made CO2 emissions.  Or human-made anything.  The biggest source of greenhouse gas emissions has been Mother Nature.  Forest fires and volcano eruptions have been some of the leading causes of greenhouse gases being released into the atmosphere.  The forest fires in California last year and Canada this summer have undone almost all the "progress" in reducing carbon emissions from the green energy fad.  Instead of outlawing cars, how about better forest management?  You've probably heard some of the preposterous scaremongering from politicians and the media.  CNN declared in big, bold letters that "global temperatures are likely highest in at least 100,000 years."  According to whom?  "One scientist told CNN."

CNN cuts Hunter Biden laptop reference from RNC chair's interview clip.  The Republican National Committee cried foul Friday after CNN cut references to Hunter Biden's laptop and the "spies who lie" letter meant to discredit it from an interview clip of RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel.  Anchor Chris Wallace was pressing McDaniel about the integrity of the 2020 election result, but the network edited out her remarks about the social media suppression of The Post's bombshell reporting on the first son when Wallace asked about how "fair" she thought the process was.  "I don't think he won it fair, I don't.  I'm not gonna say that," McDaniel said of President Biden's electoral victory.  "Let's look at the Hunter Biden laptop.  Fifty-one people in the intelligence agencies signed a letter saying it was Russian disinformation; that's what the public disseminated, was being told.  That's not true.  That's a lie."  "So you're suggesting that he may not be the legitimately elected president?" Wallace asked.  "I'm saying the American people were not given the information they deserve before that election," she replied.

CNN Rules Republicans Are the Enemy of Kids and Climate.  During Friday's CNN This Morning, the network covered 16 young people suing the state of Montana over climate change.  Chief climate correspondent Bill Weir portrayed the young people as the heroes of a movie where they attempt to fend off the Republican-controlled government, despite admitting that the lawsuit would not change anything even if the judge ruled in favor of the plaintiffs.  The lawsuit merely singled out Montana Republicans and blamed them for the existence of fossil fuel.  CNN called it "fascinating" and "such a great story."  The case hinged on the following clause in the Montana state constitution:  "The state shall maintain and improve a clean and healthful environment for present and future generations."  Nate Bellinger, senior staff attorney for Our Children's Trust claimed that fossil fuel-induced climate change forfeited the young people's right to a healthful environment.

CNN's Mostly False Take on Biden's Stance on Abortion.  As CNN looks for a new leader, then-CNN host Brian Stelter proposed this as the most important question: "What should an anchor do when a guest says something untrue?"  The public could turn this question around:  "What should a politician do when a CNN host says something untrue?"  The Stelters of this world cannot imagine anyone at CNN would ever say anything false.  They arrogantly presume they always defend the "truth."

CNN: apologists for terror.  CNN's Christiane Amanpour appeared tone deaf to the public outcry over her "news analysis" involving a mother and her two young daughters left for dead by three Palestinian terrorists in Northern Samaria.  She used the blatantly false term "shootout" to describe the cold-blooded murder of Lucy Dee and her two daughters, Maia, 20 and Rina, 15, as if suggesting an exchange of gunfire had taken place at the time the terrorists sprayed bullets into the Dee family vehicle.  The Dee family was unarmed and en route to a holiday at the seaside.  Amanpour's fanciful imagination at painting a "moral equivalency" between the two groups was not lost on Rabbi Leo Dee, husband and father to the victims.  He astutely described the reportage as representing a new age of "terror journalism."

CNN's Jake Tapper says Durham Report is 'devastating' for FBI after spending years legitimizing Russiagate.  Monday's release of the long-awaited Durham Report confirmed widespread belief among conservatives that the Russia investigation that plagued much of the Trump presidency stemmed from unsubstantiated and politicized origins.  The report, which came following a four-year investigation led by Special Counsel John Durham, was a major rebuke of the FBI and DOJ, so much so that even CNN anchor Jake Tapper was stunned. [...] Tapper's comments are significant as the longtime anchor, one of the first hires of the Jeff Zucker era, was in some ways the face of CNN's Russiagate coverage just as Rachel Maddow was for MSNBC.

CNN's Kaitlan Collins Claims 'More Than 200 Mass Shootings in 2023'.  CLAIM:  During CNN's Wednesday town hall with Donald Trump, moderator Kaitlan Collins claimed there have been "more than 200 mass shootings in 2023."  VERDICT:  False, as long as one adheres to the standard definition of a mass shooting as an incident in which four or more individuals were killed by one attacker in one incident.  On May 7, 2023, Breitbart News noted that President Joe Biden made the same claim as Collins, and on May 8, 2023, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre repeated it.

Don Lemon Makes A Racist [Fool] Of Himself, Attacking Presidental Candidate Vivek Ramaswamy Over Skin Color.  Lemon: I don't really see what one has to do with the other — and using the Civil War to talk about Black Americans — that war was not fought for Black people to have guns.  Ramaswamy: That war was fought for Black people to have freedoms in this country.  Actually, that's why the Civil War was fought.  Actually, a funny fact is — Black people did not get to enjoy the other freedoms until their Second Amendment rights were secured.  Lemon: But Black people still aren't allowed to enjoy the freedoms as well in this country.  Ramaswamy: I disagree with you on that Don.  I think you're doing a disservice to this country by failing to recognize the fact that we have equality before the laws here.  Lemon: Well, OK.  When you are in Black skin and you live in this country, then you can disagree with me.

The Editor says...
Apparently Mr. Lemon thinks your opinion is not valid unless you have black skin.  There must be a name for that kind of mentality.  But since he be black, the name can't possibly be RACISM.

Ramaswamy Schools CNN Host Don Lemon on How Ignorant He Is on Civil Rights.  Republican presidential candidate and entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy has been turning heads with his outspoken statements on what it means to be an American and the current state of the country since he jumped into the primary race in late February.  One of the proposed planks of his platform is completely tearing down several federal agencies, including the Department of Education and the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI). [...] On Wednesday morning, he took his fledgling campaign into the lion's den, sitting down for an interview with CNN hosts Don Lemon and Poppy Harlow.  Unsurprisingly, at several points in the conversation, Lemon managed to beclown himself more than once.

What The Media Did To America Is Far Worse Than The Pandemic Ever Was.  Nothing exposed the media — The New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, and on and on — for the deceitful, manipulative group of people it is than the pandemic.  A grave and urgent emergency that should have been the most pressing time since 9/11 for national unity was instead exploited by the media for the purpose of winning an election.  The cost:  Half the country was trained to accuse the other of willfully spreading death.  [Steve] Kraukauer goes over much of our Covid nightmare in a section [of his new book] that recounts the corporate press's dishonesty when covering some prominent commentators who proposed using the prolific drug ivermectin as a potential treatment for the virus, rather than risk using any of the new vaccines.  Although it's been around forever and is generously prescribed to humans in every first-world nation, all it took was for popular podcaster Joe Rogan to suggest ivermectin as an alternative to the sacred vaccines for cable news hosts to denounce it as a dangerous toxin solely used by veterinarians.  It was suddenly a hazardous "livestock drug," as endlessly repeated on CNN.

The Defense Industry's Ukraine Pundits.  Last week, CNN brought on former U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta for his fourth recent appearance to talk, once again, about Russian President Vladimir Putin's deadly invasion of Ukraine.  "I think we need to understand that there is only one thing that Putin understands, and that's force," said Panetta on Newsroom.  The former CIA director added: "I think the United States has to provide whatever weapons are necessary to the Ukrainians, so that they can hit back, and hit back now."  At no time did Panetta nor CNN mention that he's a senior counselor at Beacon Global Strategies, a defense industry consulting firm that has reportedly represented weapons manufacturer Raytheon.  The firm doesn't disclose its clients, but Raytheon and the defense industry generally stand to benefit from the conflict in Ukraine.  The episode is part of a broader pattern and practice: Since Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine, cable news networks have routinely called on defense officials-turned-consultants to offer analysis and help the American public make sense of the crisis.  Often, these analysts have used their TV time to call for greater U.S. involvement and bolder moves that could ratchet up tensions between two nuclear-armed superpowers.  The networks have consistently failed to disclose these analysts' day jobs, describing them instead by only their former high-ranking military or government roles — leaving viewers in the dark about the analysts' financial ties to defense contractors that stand to profit from increased or prolonged conflict.

Dear Mitch McConnell: You Were Not Elected To Do The Bidding Of Chuck Schumer And CNN.  Manu Raju is a Democrat activist and CNN reporter who camps out in congressional hallways to ask questions that help advance his party's political agenda.  He's done it for years.  Whether the Democrats are doing their Brett Kavanaugh smear, impeachment shenanigans, Russia-collusion hoax, or anything else, he's there to ask questions that help his team.  He's been doing it for so long that you'd have to be something of an idiot to fall for it, much less more than once.  So, for example, when corporate media and other activists were pretending that New York Republican Rep. George Santos' deceptions about his biography were the most important issue facing Americans, Raju was there.

Report: Jeff Zucker Forbade CNN Staff from Investigating 'Trump Talking Point' Coronavirus Lab Leak Theory.  Former CNN President Jeff Zucker ordered employees during then-President Donald J. Trump's administration not to investigate the theory that the coronavirus pandemic was sparked by a lab leak in China, calling it a "Trump talking point," according to a report.  A "well-placed CNN Insider" told Fox News Digital that Zucker issued the directive in the early stages of the pandemic.  On March 13, 2020, Harmeet Kauer, a "culture writer" for CNN, called the notion that the virus may have started in a laboratory a "fringe theory."  Her colleague, Scottie Andrew, on April 13, 2020, wrote an article entitled "Nearly 30% in the US believe a coronavirus theory that's almost certainly not true" in regards to the lab leak theory.  It included the subheading, "Its origin is up for debate, but it wasn't made in a lab."

CNN Misinformation — A Case Study.  Some time ago, Fani Willis, the Fulton County (GA) prosecutor, convened a special grand jury to investigate allegations that Trump tried to corruptly influence the Georgia Secretary of State to alter 2020 election results.  Part of the grand jury report has been released.  Let's see how CNN described the results.  Around 6 AM EST on February 17, CNN Anchor Kaitlan Collins made this statement:  "And so clearly, [the grand jury report] shows you know, once and for all that... there was no election fraud here."  The statement by Collins was misinformation because she left out critical information.  A grand jury is a one-sided affair, and it hears only what the prosecutor lets it hear.  Collins should have reminded her viewers of that fact.  A grand jury decides absolutely nothing... "once and for all."  If this statement came only from Kaitlan Collins, I would assume that the omission was unintentional.  But similar words (and omissions) were repeated consistently throughout the day.  To me, that suggests that CNN producers were deliberately spreading misinformation.  Here is the CNN misinformation timeline:  [Chart omitted for brevity.]  All those experienced CNN anchors, lawyers, and analysts eagerly cited the grand jury findings, but not one mentioned that those findings are entirely based on the prosecutor's evidence, as she chose to present it.  CNN was spreading coordinated misinformation.

CNN on pace to have smallest monthly audience since Obama administration among advertiser-coveted demo.  March can't come soon enough for ratings-challenged CNN.  The long-struggling network is on pace to finish February with its smallest monthly audience among the advertiser-coveted demographic of adults age 25-54 since June 2014.  "Anderson Cooper 360," "The Lead with Jake Tapper" and Wolf Blitzer's "Situation Room" are on pace to their smallest audiences since that same month among the critical demo, while "Inside Politics" is on pace for its least-viewed month among the category since August 2005.

The Editor says...
Back when CNN was shown in all the busiest airports, did the airline passengers count as viewers?

CNN Remains Unreliable Source on Conservatives Being Censored by Big Tech.  In the Trump years, CNN oppressively promoted the conspiracy theory of Donald Trump's "collusion" with the Russian government to get elected in 2016.  So, it was heartbroken when Robert Mueller's investigation ended with a negative verdict:  "The investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."  CNN media reporter Oliver Darcy climbed to the mountaintop of shamelessness in his so-called "Reliable Sources" newsletter on Feb. 8 under the heading "The Collusion Delusion."  Who's delusional now?  House Republicans investigating the role of the Biden campaign and the "intelligence community" in Twitter's suspension of the New York Post over a Hunter Biden story.  This is not a "news" letter.

Hosts 'Growing Frustrated' As CNN Sees Worst Ratings Week in Nine Years.  It's not news, necessarily, that CNN is not keeping up with the post-Trump administration times we live in — despite a change in course directed by new boss Chris Licht following a merger between CNN's parent company and Discovery.  But when tanking ratings continue to sink to levels not seen in nearly a decade, there's bound to be some talk of whether the network is salvageable at all.

Tyre Nichols Was Killed By Black Police Officers — CNN Declares It Was Still Due to Racism.  The story of a black man in Memphis who died at the hands of officers following a traffic stop had all the makings of the next racial strife to rise up in this country.  The press has been all over the incident, and the police force has been routinely indicted.  One detail has been very lightly covered, however.  The five officers involved in the incident are all black themselves.  This bit of inconvenience for the media and the activists has been a stumbling block, but at CNN, Van Jones arrives with the solution to their problems: Despite POC police involvement, it is still a case of white racism.  "Huh?!?!" you may respond.  Allow him to explain. [...]

CNN Claims Atlanta Riots Weren't 'Violent' As City Burns.  A CNN guest suggested that the Atlanta riots, pursued by Antifa, in which protestors set cars on fire, smashed windows, and shot fireworks at buildings, were everything but "violent."  David Peisner told CNN's Pamela Brown that the only acts of violence he saw were when police officers were apprehending rioters as they set the city on fire.  "You keep using these words 'violent, violent, violent, violent'... The only acts of violence against people that I saw were police tackling protesters," Peisner said.  The liberal guest went on to add that destruction of physical property is not the same as violence against humans, so therefore it is acceptable.

Stunning cable news ratings reveal crisis-level decline of CNN.  For the "key demo" — the 25-54 year old audience that advertisers covet — the story is even grimmer for CNN.  At 6 AM, CNN can only draw 30,000 viewers in the key demo.  In prime time, 8 and 9 PM hours, the hapless Anderson Cooper draws only 50 and 55 thousand key demo viewers, respectively.  With ratings this pathetic, CNN's new owners, Warner Brothers Discovery, may be regretting its purchase.  Their new president of CNN, Chris Licht, has so far presided over further decline.  It is no surprise, then, that CNN will be abandoning its landmark CNN headquarters, formerly a tourist attraction, to save money, and is even contemplating a comedian to rescue its prime time lineup.  Unless Mr. Licht gets a clue and shuns progressives for that role, it will be fruitless.

CNN's Latest Excuse for Biden Taking Classified Information Would Make Stalin Proud.  While you might have thought that Joe Biden illegally taking and keeping classified information for six years following his vice presidency was a scandal, CNN is here to set you straight.  The legacy cable news outlet — which I've been assured is getting back to hard news and unbiased reporting — has a new piece out that would make Stalin proud.  In it, they lay out the case that Biden is completely innocent because his final days as vice president were a "whirlwind," and it's completely probable that these classified documents were just taken by accident, moved to multiple locations, including the president's home, and kept for over half a decade.  Get a load of the picture they used.  This is Pravda on steroids.  [Tweet]

Adam Kinzinger Hired as CNN Senior Political Commentator.  In the most predictable breaking news possible, on Wednesday evening, CNN host Erin Burnett announced on her eponymous program Erin Burnett OutFront that former anti-Trump Republican and Pelosi-picked January 6 committee member Adam Kinzinger had been hired as a "senior political commentator" on the network.  This, of course, makes perfect sense because other than our friends Scott Jennings and Stephen Gutowski, Adam Kinzinger is the type of "Republican" voice thar gets a lot of airtime on CNN.

CNN Chief Says 'Uninformed Vitriol' from the Left Has Been 'Stunning'.  [CNN boss Chris] Licht's public chatter about making CNN less partisan and screamy is drawing bad reviews from partisan and screamy leftists.  This went unsaid:  CNN hasn't really changed at all.

CNN Calls Freedom of Speech 'Nonsense' in Moronic Rant.  Did you know that freedom of speech is "nonsense?"  That's the word from CNN, which let a former CIA flunky spew falsehoods in an attempt to smear Elon Musk's management of Twitter.  As RedState previously reported, Musk is set to grant a "general amnesty" to formerly banned accounts.  There will be some exceptions if those accounts broke the law or engaged in targeted calls for violence, but a deluge of accounts that simply broke leftwing orthodoxy are set to return.  That has the clowns over at CNN shaking in terror, so much so that they are willing to boot basic constitutional principles in the process.  [Tweets]  Everything is about Vladimir Putin to these people.  According to them, he stalks the shadows like some bizarro Batman, ready to pounce at any moment with memes and "disinformation."  Of course, Robert Baer is in the same camp of flacks who insisted that Hunter Biden's laptop was Russian disinformation, and we all saw how that turned out.

CNN Wildly Spins Like a Top in Incredulous New 'Report' on Suspected Colorado Gunman.  After watching various "reporting" from so-called news outlets, there is no doubt that the claim by the Colorado "Club Q" mass shooting suspect's attorneys that the person identifies as "non-binary" and likely is not a fervent MAGA supporter has sent The Usual Suspects into an absolute tailspin.  CNN, unsurprisingly, been the worst of the bunch, as we noted Thursday after they "interviewed" a transgender woman who suggested that Anderson Aldrich, the suspect in the mass shooting that killed five people, could not possibly have been "non-binary" ... because he's a man.  This followed a segment in which anchor Alisyn Camerota looked visibly agitated and was momentarily speechless after finding out what the lawyers said, as though she didn't want to believe it.  Sadly for Camerota, an NBC News reporter has seemingly confirmed that Aldrich does indeed identify as a member of the LGBTQ community.  Unfortunately, CNN's follow-up "reports" have actually gotten worse, as evidenced by the below video which features CNN correspondent Nick Watt actually trying to massage the story to fit a preconceived narrative.

Why you shouldn't trust CNN for any health information.  RFK Jr. wrote two really amazing articles about two of "CNN's finest": Jake Tapper and Sanjay Gupta.  Everyone should read these articles.  They are relatively short and priceless.  In a nutshell, Sanjay Gupta and Jake Tapper both spread misinformation and when confronted with the facts, they simply ignore it and continue on as if everything is OK.  Also, RFK makes a compelling case that the flu vaccine should be stopped.  It basically doesn't do anything but make the problem worse.

MSNBC, CNN contributor claims Republicans will ban all birth control 'Nationwide'.  A known MSNBC/CNN contributor who's also a prolific liar claimed in a [...] tweet posted Friday that Republicans intend to ban condoms, abortion, Plan B pills, and birth control pills if they retake Congress next month.  Never mind that such a drastic proposal would require the approval of President Joe Biden, a far-left Democrat who loves him some abortion and birth control.  "There will be no condoms.  There will be no abortions.  There will be no Plan B pills.  There will be no birth control pills," MSNBC/CNN contributor Tristan Snell tweeted.  "Republicans will ban them all — nationwide, all 50 states and DC.  They've literally promised to do this, and we need to listen — and take action," he added.

Donald Trump Sues CNN in $475 Million Defamation Lawsuit.  Former President Donald Trump is suing CNN in a $475 million defamation lawsuit, according to a complaint filed in federal court on Monday [10/3/2022].  The lawsuit focuses on the network's characterization of Trump as being a "racist," "Russian lackey," "insurrectionist," and its "persistent association" of Trump to Adolf Hitler and Nazism.  "[T]he time has finally come to hold CNN responsible and legally accountable for their willful deception and defamatory statements made about me and both, directly and indirectly, my strong, devoted, and patriotic supporters," Trump said in a statement released shortly after his attorneys filed the lawsuit.

Donald Trump sues CNN claiming defamation, seeks $475M.  Former president Donald Trump sued CNN for defamation on Monday, seeking $475 million in punitive damages and claiming that the network had carried out a "campaign of libel and slander" against him.  Trump claims in his lawsuit, filed in US District Court in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., that the network had used its influence as a leading news organization to defeat him politically.  CNN declined to comment on the case.

The Editor says...
Trump is striking while the iron is hot.  A year from now, they might not be worth $475 million.

The American media and the art of grotesque misrepresentations.  Andrew Kaczynski is a CNN personality who published a misleading hit piece on Joe Kent, a Republican candidate in Washington State running for Congress.  Kaczynski's effort perfectly illustrates the debauched, diseased state of modern "journalism."  Then, when a Republican strategist commented on what Kaczynski had done, Mediaite used exactly the same tactic against the Republican strategist.  Joe Kent is an Army veteran who is running on a platform that would have been centrist back in the 1980s and before.  He advocates for American jobs, less government regulation, lower taxes, controlled immigration, the end of foreign wars (once a Democrat position), support for the military and law enforcement, an end to Chinese aggression, and putting America's interests ahead of those of foreign countries.  Only when it comes to the Second Amendment (for) and abortion (against) would he have been recognized as a Republican back in the day.  However, this is 2022, so pro-American values are "far right," at least as far as Andrew Kaczynski of CNN is concerned.

The old phony-struggling-against-the-wind act:
CNN Busted In Their Coverage Of Hurricane Ian.  Florida Govenor Ron DeSantis delivered an update on Thursday morning following the destruction of Hurricane Ian.  Ian was downgraded from a hurricane level 4 when it hit land to a tropical storm on Thursday morning. [...] However, CNN decided to never let a crisis go to waste!  Even [though] the hurricane was once in a 500-year event as DeSantis himself confirmed, CNN needed to create some fake news and one man unintentionally trolled the fake news reporter as he was trying to make it look like he was at the heart of the storm!  [Video clip]

CNN and 'experts' say keeping violent criminals in jail won't make people safer.  CNN has turned to its trusted "experts" to argue that keeping violent criminals in jail would not keep people safe from violent criminals.  This "news" report comes in the aftermath of violent attacks in Memphis, Tennessee.  According to CNN's Emma Tucker, "the suspects in two violent attacks there this month had been released from prison before serving their full sentences for prior convictions."  Naturally, it follows that if they had remained in prison where they belonged, they would not have been on the street to commit the gruesome crimes that they committed.  Ah, but the "experts" see it differently!

CNN questioned after altering blood-red background of Biden's speech.  CNN is facing questions from critics after the network was busted altering the lighting for President Biden's Thursday address, softening the blood-red hues to calmer shades of pink.  The president came in for withering mockery online for the harsh black and red backdrop, with many comparing the optics to "Star Wars" and "V for Vendetta."  While networks like CNN, MSNBC, CBS and C-SPAN carrying the speech all originally appeared consistent, CNN noticeably altered the color of the background from red to pink in real-time.

CNN Journo Who Reported 'Fiery But Mostly Peaceful Protests' Gets Emmy Nomination.  The CNN journalist best known for reporting from the burning scene of "fiery but mostly peaceful protests" following the justified non-fatal police shooting of armed sexual-assault suspect Jacob Blake in Kenosha, Wis., has been nominated for an Emmy award.  CNN correspondent Omar Jimenez was one of five nominees in the "Outstanding Emerging Journalist" category.  A Washington Free Beacon analysis determined that the word "emerging" is a euphemism for "non-white."  Other nominees included Anna Kook of Al Jazeera Plus, the controversial media outlet funded by Qatari oligarchs, and Vice correspondent Paola Ramos, a "Latinx Communications Strategist" who worked on Hillary Clinton's failed presidential campaign in 2016.  The Kenosha riots in August 2020 lasted nearly a week and caused tens of millions of dollars' worth of property damage.  Rioters took to the streets after a bystander posted a video of Blake's encounter with police.  Mainstream journalists repeatedly spread disinformation by describing Blake as "unarmed."

CNN Finally Reports on Hunter's Laptop It Once Called 'Breitbart Rabbit Hole'.  More than 18 months after describing Hunter Biden's laptop as a "Breitbart rabbit hole," far-left CNN has begun to report on it. [...] Oh, but now that Biden is damaged goods... Now that the left wants Biden not to seek reelection...  Now the Breitbart rabbit hole is not so much of a rabbit hole.  Now that the Breitbart rabbit hole is useful to the left in holding on to the presidency in 2024 with a different nominee than Biden, CNNLOL is all up in that rabbit hole reporting on the laptop.

Donald Trump Announces He Is Suing CNN, Will Target Other Media Outlets as Well.  Former President Donald Trump on Wednesday announced his intention to sue CNN, one of the prime purveyors of what Trump has famously deemed "fake news," over "repeated defamatory statements" against him, warning that he will take similar action against other media outlets as well.  The 282-page letter, addressed to CNN's Chief Executive Officer Chris Licht as well as CNN's executive Vice President and General Counsel David Vigilante, demands the network publish what is described as  ["]...a full and fair correction, apology, or retraction, in the same editions or corresponding issues of the website publication in which the aforementioned articles, transcripts, or broadcasts appeared and in as conspicuous a place and type as said original article, transcript or broadcast within ten (10) days from the date of service of this notice.["]  "Failure to publish such a correction, apology, or retraction will result in the filing of a lawsuit and damages being sought against you, CNN," the letter reads, detailing several examples of what Trump's team contends is defamation.

'Life On Earth Is At Stake': CNN Correspondent Suggests Biden Use Military To Produce Electric Vehicles.  CNN correspondent Bill Weir suggested that the Biden administration mobilize the military to produce electric vehicles and claimed "life on Earth was at stake" due to climate change on CNN Tuesday [7/26/2022].  Weir expressed frustration that the filibuster was preventing Congress from passing legislation and that President Joe Biden was limited in his ability to tackle climate change during his appearance on CNN.  He suggested the nationalization of industries as one method to mitigate the issue. [...] Biden announced executive actions to combat climate change Wednesday [7/20/2022], including funding for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to combat extreme heat along with efforts to lower the cost of cooling homes.

The Editor says...
How is FEMA expected "to combat extreme heat?"

Don Lemon Throws a Hissy Fit, Demands Republicans Be Treated as 'Danger to Society'.  The new leadership at CNN came in declaring that they wanted to get away from the biased journalism that has been the hallmark of CNN for the past few years.  But it sounds like Don Lemon is throwing a bit of a fit over the concept of being an objective unbiased journalist — something he doesn't exactly know how to be.  He doesn't think it's right to be "fair" to Republicans, because he believes that Republicans are such a danger to society.  [Video clip]

Don Lemon: 'We're Not Doing Our Jobs' if Media is Fair to GOP.  Recently, CNN's New Day has been on a streak of providing fairly objective reporting.  Alas, it was a streak that Don Lemon decided to end this Thursday morning [7/14/2022], ambling over from his nightly slots for what seemed to be a monthly Festivus tradition of his:  complaining that the media isn't doing enough to attack Republicans.  Essentially openly opposing new CNN boss Chris Licht's reported desire to bring CNN back to journalism and away from Lemon's brand of partisanship.

Stelter Allows Former Ministry of Truth Head to Spread Disinformation.  On Sunday's Reliable Sources on CNN, host Brian Stelter spent the opening monologue of his show in a tizzy over the amount of disinformation on the internet and in American politics in general.  So naturally, Stelter decided to bring the former head of President Joe Biden's Ministry of Truth Nina Jankowicz to help her rehabilitate her image.  Perhaps unsurprisingly, Jankowicz spread disinformation herself during the interview.  Predictably, Stelter opened the segment by sucking up to her and failed to correct her on any of her lies. [...] She purposefully lied about former President Trump's ties to the Russian Alfa Bank and that he had two secret email servers to communicate with the Russians.  Both claims were and are flat-out false.  Screenshots are forever, Nina!  Of course, Stelter never confronted her about this either.

CNN: Recessions Are Racist.  The U.S. economy shrank worse than expected in the first quarter, stoking fears that we are headed for recession, if not already in one.  In fact, most Americans already believe we are in a recession.  And they're probably right.  A recession is defined as two consecutive quarters with negative growth.  However, as CNN's Nicole Goodkind notes, "the economy isn't broadly and officially considered to be in a recession until a relatively unknown group of eight economists says so."  Goodkind then attempts to make this all sound sinister — like it's a bunch of James Bond villains hiding in a secret lair plotting world domination by pointing out that these economists "serve together as the Business Cycle Dating Committee, are hand-selected by and work under the umbrella of the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), a private nonprofit organization."  So, what exactly is CNN's problem?  Well, it seems all but inevitable that the Biden Recession will soon be official, so to preempt this, CNN has declared this cabal of economists racist.

CNN Peddles Debunked Cassidy Hutchinson's Narrative as 'a Bombshell'.  The debunked Cassidy Hutchinson testimony, spun before the partisan January 6 Committee on Tuesday, continued to be peddled by CNN on Wednesday as "a bombshell" revelation.  Aides to former President Donald Trump were left speechless amid the first half of Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony on Tuesday, acknowledging to CNN that her testimony was 'a bombshell' with potentially huge repercussions for Trump," Gabby Orr and Pamela Brown reported for CNN.  But the credibility of Hutchinson's testimony imploded just hours after the lead Secret Service agent in charge of former President Trump's security detail offered to contradict Hutchinson's testimony under oath.

CNN Caught Lying About Alex Jones While Covering For Drug Dealers.  CNN aired a terribly produced hit piece where they claim Alex Jones lied that law enforcement in Rockwall, Texas, were moonlighting as drug dealers.  We then show news footage from a 1989 KXAS-TV news package on indictments of the Rockwell County Sheriff and his chief deputy for stealing drugs from the evidence room and selling those drugs.  CNN and those that work with them are like new age Nazi propagandists.  [Video clip]

Jeffrey Toobin argues, 'There's a lot of right-wing terrorism in this country,' ignores left-wing violence.  CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin ignored recent examples of progressive violence when he went on "At This Hour With Kate Bolduan" on Wednesday to condemn "the pervasiveness of right-wing violence."  Toobin appeared on a panel discussing the ongoing Jan. 6 hearings and potential connections to former President Donald Trump.  In the latest hearing by the Jan. 6 Committee on Tuesday, state officials testified that they received several threats and attacks from people after refusing to overturn the 2020 election results.  Toobin argued those threats were further proof that "right-wing violence" is now pervasive throughout the country.

CNN reporter defends Biden's mental strength, says the 'gears of his mind are working'.  CNN correspondent John Harwood defended President Biden against critics who have concerns over the president's age during a segment on Sunday's "Reliable Sources." [...] CNN host Brian Stelter discussed how there is a growing concern among those in the media and politics, that Biden may be too old to run for president for a second term.  While Harwood agreed that Biden is old, he said it was false that Biden is incapable of doing his job.

The Daily Wire Produces A Savage Montage Of CNN Spreading Fake News.  Ben Shapiro's The Daily Wire is just a few years old, but they have already carved out a huge space in the conservative news niche for their powerful assault on corporate media outlets of all kinds.  Fox News has repeatedly proven itself to be a shill for Big Pharma and leftist causes, and Newsmax has even sold out on Ukraine.  Thankfully, and perhaps recognizing this void in real truth telling, The Daily Wire has stepped up to the plate. [...] [T]he short clips come together with the perfectly-overlaid score to produce a truly remarkable summary of CNN's specific, and corporate media's general, collapse.  They simply cannot report fairly, accurately, or honestly. [...] [T]he real reason for CNN's abysmal ratings is tied directly to their inability to serve the public interest.  When a lineup of Don Lemon, Chris Cuomo, Brian Stelter, and so many other hosts of primetime slots can't hide their elitist and intellectual snobbery at regular Americans, and pass along hoaxes as real news, abject failure is the only possible result.

CNN Blames Republicans For Attempted Left-Wing Assassination Of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.  CNN blamed Republicans Wednesday for fostering the environment that reportedly led a California man to Justice Brett Kavanaugh's Maryland home, confessing intent "to kill the Supreme Court justice" and carrying a gun and multiple other weapons and burglary tools.  According to an affidavit obtained by ABC News, the man was taken into custody after he was found with a Glock handgun, ammunition, a knife, pepper spray, and various tools for forced entry.  The affidavit also noted that the man "told the detective that he was upset about the leak of a recent Supreme Court draft decision" regarding abortion, one that could see Roe v. Wade overturned.  He also said he was upset about "the recent school shooting in Uvalde, Texas."

CNN Denied Attempted Kavanaugh Assassin Was Armed, Cries 'Both Sides'.  After taking over an hour to get to the major breaking story of the day Wednesday [6/8/2022] — the attempted assassination of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh at his home earlier that morning — CNN's At This Hour tried to downplay the incident by suggesting the man wasn't armed "at all" and tried to claim there were threats from "both sides" of the political spectrum.  Despite reports that the would-be assassin was armed with a gun, a knife, and pepper spray, and was angered by the leaked draft decision that could overturn Roe v. Wade, CNN law enforcement correspondent Whitney Wild tried to downplay the entire situation, even denying he had any weapons on him.

CNN's Farce of an "Investigation".  CNN's "investigation" of the death of Al Jazeera reporter Shireen Abu Akleh did not, as it claims, show that Israeli forces intentionally murdered her.  Instead, CNN only showed the world how far the news company has fallen from serious journalism.  CNN's incendiary accusation that Israel intentionally killed Abu Akleh builds assumptions on top of assumptions.  It relies not so much on objective, incontrovertible evidence, but on the feelings of biased eyewitnesses.  All the while, plausible alternative explanations are not only cast aside, but effectively covered up by CNN's reporting.  These are the acts of a partisan organization, not a serious news agency.

CNN Overstates Public Risk of Monkeypox, Repeats Biden Lies.  CNN wants you to be as afraid of monkeypox as you were of COVID, and we all need to panic.  Biden said everyone should be aware of monkeypox, so the media uncritically reports the same.  But the threat patterns are not the same for the general public, just as they weren't for COVID which preyed on obese elderly patients.  Monkeypox, by comparison, seems to prey on gay men engaged in high-risk sexual activity.  You would never know that by reading CNN though.

CNN's Eye is on the Sparrow.  [Scroll down]  For those whose local press is as focused on nonsense as CNN, let me recap the significance of this week's proceedings instituted by special counsel John Durham after a lengthy investigation into the origins of the Russian hoax, which was generated and promoted by Hillary Clinton to advance her election and which, after she lost, served to tie up President Trump and his administration with investigations and impeachments.  The indictment was a detailed 26-page outline indictment of the case which is now ongoing.  It is precise and limited — Sussman is accused of lying to the FBI's General Counsel in September 2016 when he asserted that he was not representing a client at the time he claimed that Russia's Alfa Bank was a direct conduit between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin.

CNN Spins 'Right-Wing' Violence Narrative As Abortion Activists Rage Nationwide.  Corporate media outlets, including CNN, are spreading concern that "far-right" extremists will commit violence due to the reportedly pending Supreme Court decision to undo Roe vs.  Wade, even as pro-abortion activists take to the streets and are causing unrest across the country.  A CNN report released Friday cited a U.S. Capitol Police alert warning of "far-right calls for violence" against a religious group planning a pro-abortion protest at the Supreme Court.  Beyond this single alert, CNN did not cite any further specific threat posed by right-wing extremists related to the reported decision to overturn Roe vs. Wade.

CNN claims Normal Weather Is A Climate Crisis.  "Temperatures in parts of India and Pakistan have reached record levels, putting the lives of millions at risk as the effects of the climate crisis are felt across the subcontinent.  The heatwave has also been felt by India's neighbor Pakistan, where the cities of Jacobabad and Sibi in the country's southeastern Sindh province recorded highs of 47 degrees Celsius (116.6 Fahrenheit) on Friday"  [This is followed by numerous newspaper reports from decades ago, showing that brutally hot weather is normal in India.]

In A Week Full Of Stupidity, CNN Is The Stupidest.  It's not unusual to see gaslighting from the left-wing media, but this report from CNN has taken the phenomenon to new levels.  There are plenty of safety concerns regarding the leak, and there have been plenty of death threats, but they have all been against the presumed justices who are apparently prepared to rule in favor of overturning Roe V Wade. [...] Because you see, when radicals on the right make threats or get carried away with a protest, that amounts to an "insurrection" and the left forms committees and tries to make the midterm elections about the atrociousness of it.  But when leftists threaten to kill Supreme Court justices, leak confidential documents with the expressed intent of intimidating the justices' rulings, and then attempt to instill fear in those justices with violent protests in the streets, that's all fine and dandy.  This is how it works in American politics nowadays, which explains why the Democrats and their media ignored the violence.

CNN: Capitol Police 'Warning the Far Right Is Calling for Violence' after Supreme Court Leak.  On Friday's [5/6/2022] "CNN Newsroom," co-host and Chief National Security Correspondent Jim Sciutto reported that after the leak of the Supreme Court's draft opinion on Roe v. Wade, "Capitol Police are warning the far right is calling for violence against a religious group planning to rally for abortion rights."  Sciutto stated, "This morning, law enforcement officials are preparing for potential violence in the capital and nationwide after the leak of that Supreme Court draft opinion that would strike down Roe v. Wade after 50 years.  Capitol Police are warning the far right is calling for violence against a religious group planning to rally for abortion rights."

CNN Sees Biden's Political Troubles as Nearly Unfixable.  To hear Democrats today, outrage over the possible overturning of Roe v. Wade will cause a blue wave this November.  It's an amusing theory that doesn't quite hold up under scrutiny.  Even Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.V.) pointed out earlier this week that abortion is by no means the number one issue in his state.  "Inflation is the number one driving factor I believe in my state.  Right now, it's hurting everybody, not just at the pump, but at the grocery store, at the drug store, at the pharmaceutical.  Everything they do," he explained.  Joe Biden's cheerleaders at CNN seem to agree.

CNN Is In Complete Freefall.  CNN lost its credibility years ago, going back to at least the Obama Administration, but probably even earlier.  But during the Bush and Obama years, there was a lingering sense of trust for some Americans, allowing CNN to keep its audience to weak but respectable levels.  When Donald Trump arrived on the scene in 2015, CNN and every other mainstream media outlet promoted and then exploited Trump Derangement Syndrome to the point that anyone afflicted with TDS was tuning in constantly to learn about how "the walls are closing in" with the outlandish Russia Hoax.  But Trump is no longer in the White House, having been replaced by a complete buffoon that they — the left and their media — propped up.  CNN had already been exposed as frauds with their years of dishing out fake news.  They followed up that credibility crisis with a series of recent scandals, [...]

CNN's Harwood:  Not a 'pretty picture... but so far zero evidence' Biden did anything wrong related to Hunter.  The mainstream liberal media must perhaps be getting worried about the repercussions of the ongoing U.S. Department of Justice investigation into the Hunter Biden laptop scandal and related allegations of influence pedaling.  Big Tech and the corporate media censored or sought to discredit the story, a scoop by the New York Post, during the 2020 election cycle because they apparently perceived that it would harm candidate Joe Biden and Democrats generally.  As the scandal gains further traction, however, journalists, or those perhaps more accurately described as publicists, now appear to be circling the wagons around the Biden administration.  In the clip embedded above, CNN White House correspondent John Harwood, for example, served up a helping of word salad on the ratings-challenged network that President Donald J. Trump memorably labeled as "very fake news."

CNN's spin-machine sputters trying to downplay Biden's gaffes, cover 'incredibly successful week'.  If CNN was capable of describing itself honestly, the best definition would be that it's a word-laundering spin machine for the Democrats and President Joe Biden.  On the heels of Biden's tour of Europe, the White House has scrambled — as it seemingly must every single day — to mend the latest series of gaffes spilling forth from Joe Biden's incongruous and unfiltered manner of speech, and ever-devoted CNN was there to bat cleanup for the regime.  The pundits of "New Day" discussed Biden's recent statement that Russian President Vladimir Putin "cannot remain in power" on Monday's show, with senior political analyst John Avlon providing cover and referring to Biden's statement as "a mistake to the extent that it is a gaffe" and merely an "outburst."

Meltdown: CNN's Brian Stelter Refuses to Walk Back His False Claims Hunter Biden's Laptop Emails Were 'Russian Disinformation'.  CNN anchor Brian Stelter on Friday refused to walk back inaccurate claims he promoted on his program when he claimed Hunter Biden's "laptop from hell" emails were "Russian disinformation."  "Hey, just curious, when did I claim 'Hunter Biden's laptop emails were likely Russian propaganda'?  Can you send me the quote?" he sent in a direct message on Twitter to this reporter, a reference to a Thursday Breitbart News article in which he was listed along with 14 others in establishment media for falsely suggesting the laptop was Russian propaganda and disinformation.  In response, Stelter was asked if he stood by the inaccurate claims he made on his show where he suggested the Hunter Biden emails may have been "made up" and could have been "Russian disinformation," or if he was planning to retract the inaccurate comments.

Chris Cuomo's $125M CNN Lawsuit Contains Stunning Corruption Allegations.  [Scroll down]  And I believe every word of it.  In fact, for years and years, I've been telling you this kind of stuff was going on at CNN.  And let's not forget that this stuff shows that everyone at CNN is ethically compromised.  They're all guilty, every single one of them.  They're all corrupt and tarnished and dishonest hacks and liars.  Now, this doesn't mean I'm siding with Chris Cuomo.  Not at all.  For this and a half dozen other flagrant ethical violations, including staging a fake video where he supposedly reemerged from a basement quarantine, this guy was bad news from day one.  The problem for CNN, though, is that it might very well be vulnerable on the issue of selective enforcement of an ethical code it never had.  Also, if this thing goes to court and depositions are taken under oath... Oh, boy!

Wyoming GOP Would Like a Word After CNN Claims 'Influential' People Back Liz Cheney.  Ah, liberal media — their delusion is something else sometimes and chief among them are the Democratic apologists over at CNN.  CNN had a piece on Monday telling us how all the "influential" Republicans are rushing to support Rep. Liz Cheney (RINO-WY) in her race in November.  That there are so "many" that a fundraiser for Monday [3/14/2022] had to cap its guest list at 75.  That would be about the number of folks in the line at the bathroom for a Trump rally among the thousands, and several of those 75 are Cheney family members.  So who are some of those "influential" Republicans who are going to somehow revitalize Cheney in Wyoming?  People from the "orbits" of Sen. Mitt Romney and the Bushes.  Romney is the event's "special guest."

CNN [has been] Forced to Admit Left-Wing Bias [is] Killing [its] Ratings.  CNN, a left-wing, basement-rated misinformation machine that spreads conspiracy theories and violence, is now admitting its blatant partisanship has damaged its ratings and credibility. [...] Chris Licht is the former showrunner of — get this — The Late Show with Stephen Colbert.  So the very idea Licht will 1) give people on the right anything close to a fair hearing is not going to happen and 2) there's just no getting around the fact that people who come from Licht's bubbled world tend not to know what "objectivity," "truth," and "professionalism" really are.  Like all the others, Licht will be concerned only with one thing: status within the bubble, which means CNN will only get a little less worse.

CNN Journalists Magically Appear Right Where Russian's are Airdropping, Get Completely Left Alone by Russian Troops.  It's almost like CNN has a Russian insider who is working with the Commie News Network, aka CNN aka Very Fake News.  It's very rare for mainstream media outlets to allow their people out in the warzone unless they're embedded with military units.  It's also very rare that Russian troops don't shoot or arrest people recording them doing their dirty deeds.  Something just doesn't seem right.  [Video clip]

A Noticeable Shift Is Seen as CNN Pulls Back From Tilting at a Favorite Windmill.  The one-time leader and sole creator of 24-hour cable news outlet, CNN has fallen in recent years — and not just on hard times.  It is amazing to sit back and consider that the channel that quite literally revolutionized broadcast journalism has been reduced to less than a competitor — to a distant also-ran in the ratings.  It has been years now since the channel has sunk to Hallmark Channel-levels in the ratings, and the recent spate of scandals has compounded the trauma.  One of the ironies seen from Jeff Zucker's outlet is the perpetual whining taking place about how Fox News is not a valid news network.

CNN Wants To Know: 'How Stupid Do You Think We Are?'  [Scroll down]  Note first that [Erin] Burnett does not identify this "GOP senator".  The source is anonymous and, therefore, insignificant.  Second, and even more telling, note that Burnett does not say that this GOP senator was present at the meeting but only that they are "familiar with the matter".  That is what is known in critical reasoning texts as "weasel words."  The expression "familiar with the matter" is vague enough to include people with no direct knowledge of the events.  That is, this anonymous alleged GOP senator may be relaying a conversation they had in a hallway, not something they witnessed themselves.  Even though Burnett has no identifiable source for her assertions, she sanctimoniously asks, "Why would two sitting GOP senators 'cover' for the President when so many people know the truth.  All we can say is this, they're not alone in lying and yes we can use that word."  Burnett is right that she can use the word "lying" but she has not shown that she can justifiably use it.  The word "can" has that useful, for sophists, ambiguity or equivocation.

CNN's Brianna Keiler, Gov. Gretchen Whitmer Blame 'Right Wing Media' for Freedom Convoy Protest.  I've written how liberals like Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Ottawa city councilor Diane Deans have been trying to blame Americans for the protests in Canada.  After trying to smear their fellow Canadians as racists, they've now moved on to suggest that it's Americans behind it all, to negate the opinion of their fellow Canadians and deny that yes, it's Canadians who are doing this.  Both CNN and Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer are now taking that a step further, and trying to blame "right-wing media."  "Right-wing media is really fueling it," CNN's Brianna Keiler claimed.

Not Just CNN: Mainstream Media Is on the Ropes.  I'm not just talking about NBC's pathetic coverage of the Beijing Olympics that nobody is watching, though that's an indication.  Nor am I talking about the well-known polling that rates the media's popularity somewhere below Congress, if such a thing were possible.  That's been going on for a while.  It's more.  Let's take a tour d'horizon, but first... CNN.  A widely discussed article by media critic Joe Concha concludes:  "The collapse of CNN is now complete:  9 out of 10 viewers, gone.  Its top-rated anchor, Chris Cuomo, gone.  Its network president, gone.  Its integrity in shambles.  "Oh, and new management coming in that is signaling big-time changes — changes that may bring CNN back to the proud network it once was before [network President] Jeff Zucker destroyed it."  True enough, but should CNN be brought back?  A company that deliberately downplayed the atrocities committed by Saddam Hussein's regime (they even admitted it) in order to maintain their exclusive access to that same regime should have vanished years ago.  We would have been spared all the endless Trump-Russia lies.

The Washington Post Throws Shade on a Major CNN 'Scoop' About Intercepted Russian Communications and Rightfully So.  On Monday [2/7/2022], CNN's crack foreign policy team of Natasha "Fusion" Bertrand, Jim Sciutto, and Katie Bo Lillis broke an exclusive on Ukraine US intel indicates Russian officers have had doubts about full scale Ukraine invasion.  What the story purports to show are senior Russian officers dishing over how messed up an invasion of Ukraine would be, how badly they might get [beaten], and how [bad] they feel about their carefully plotted "false flag" attack being publicly revealed. [...] If true, the story could be significant.  It shows some reluctance by Russian officers to take part in a "minor incursion" into Ukraine and would indicate that the whole plan to do so, to the extent that one exists, has raised doubts and concerns.  Did I already say "if true?"  There are a lot of reasons to doubt this story.  First and foremost, the sourcing is so skeevy as to scream, "don't believe this [...]."  Second, two of the biggest tools at the Home Depot that is CNN, contributed to this report.  Third, the information in the story would be highly compartmentalized, and leaking it would set off a major counterintelligence review by the FSB. [...] Lastly, no other news outlet has done its own reporting on the story.  The only instances where this story appears on Google are in outlets that credit the story to CNN.  How often does that happen?  How often does any outlet get a major scoop that absolutely no one of significance comments on or can move the story forward with its own reporting?

CNN: A fallen idol, a suppurating stew of bawl-babies, and high-school schemers.  It's been nearly a week since CNN's top executive, Jeff Zucker, got the boot, supposedly over a longtime affair with a subordinate, and the bawling through the ranks hasn't stopped. [...] Obviously, this guy Zucker, the big fallen Goomba-Goomba cult idol, wasn't this bottom-ranked network's boss or leader; he was really their best friend forever. [...] That explains a lot about their strange coverage over the past few years — the Russia hoax, the Trump impeachment, the false attack on the Covington kids, the "fiery but peaceful" protests, and other insane left-wingery that could not by any standard be called "journalism."  It was all Zucker whispering into his suggestible little minions' ears about what kind of left-wing narrative he wanted to project and watching them "go fetch" for him like the dogs they are.  The whole network was truly his, and these characters were his arms.

Chris Cuomo wants as much as $60 million from CNN amid Jeff Zucker exit.  Chris Cuomo isn't backing down in his battle with CNN following the ouster of his boss Jeff Zucker — the anchor intends to demand as much as a $60 million settlement, according to sources.  Multiple sources tell Page Six that Cuomo, who was fired in December for helping his brother fend off sexual harassment allegations, is ready to dig his heels in by claiming that Zucker not only knew about his dealings with the governor — but that the network boss had his own inappropriate dealings with Andrew.  And he is prepared to demand not the $18 million left on his contract, but as much as $60 million.  "He wants Megyn Kelly money," we're told.  One source said:  "Chris insists he never did anything for his brother Andrew that Zucker didn't know about. [...]"

CNN's collapse is now complete.  [Scroll past the history of CNN.]  In the spring of 2020, the country was in a horrific place.  Businesses shut completely; people were scared.  There were no COVID-19 therapeutics, no vaccines.  Hospitals were overwhelmed, thousands were dying each day.  If ever there was a time for news organizations to educate and inform the public, this was it.  Instead, Zucker apparently believed it was the perfect time to exploit the situation for political gain and to help the network's ratings.  Andrew Cuomo benefited from briefings that made him appear to be the adult in the room regarding COVID-19 and Trump appear to be the villain.  Cuomo got a $5.1 million book deal as a result.  Chris Cuomo and Zucker/Gollust/CNN benefited from marathon interviews with Cuomo's governor/brother, which didn't touch the governor's alleged nursing home scandal.  Ratings soared.

CNN Continues to Collude With the J-6 Commission and Expose Itself as the Hack News Outlet.  As CNN continues to reel from the departure of Jeff Zucker, the network is also continuing with another practice — serving as the accomplice with members of the January Six Commission investigating the Capitol Riot.  One of the unintended offshoots of the Zucker debacle was a curious admission made by one of the network's entrenched Washington fixtures, correspondent Jamie Gangel, immediately after his firing.  Gangel let slip that members of Congress had reached out to her to express their dismay at Zucker's demise.

Compilation of Proven Lies By Fake-News Channel CNN Over the Years Proves they're not to be Trusted.  CNN has proven to be nothing more than an arm of the Democrat party.  Here is just a smidgen of the total BS they have been spewing over the past couple years that turned out to be completely false.  Then they have the audacity to claim they're unbiased.  Anyone who thinks that is either brainwashed or dumb.  [Video clip]

Discovery CEO: Hey, I had nothing to do with Zucker's termination from CNN.  Discovery CEO David Zaslav is doing some explaining of the latest news reports coming out of CNN's Jeff Zucker's exit.  Zaslav says he had nothing to do with it, contrary to reports.  Also, when he called CNN 'the leader of news to the left', he meant "the 'left' side of the company portfolio, with sports being on the 'right'."  Got it.  Zaslav sees the news on the left and sports on the right.  Sadly, we know that even sports can't be characterized as more conservative than news, in general, these days with political activism so regularly easing into sports reporting.  We can understand his distinction, though, even if it seems a little wishful in logic.

CNN: The Future of Fake News.  CNN is dying.  Its president, Jeff Zucker, was just fired.  (Or, rather, he "resigned.")  The network's viewership is plummeting, and fewer than 500,000 people on average tuned in last month.  Advertisers don't send their dollars there much anymore, and the "stars" the network once had either have been removed for cause or caught up in sex or other scandals.  Chris "Fredo" Cuomo threatened to burn the place down after getting fired last year.  Why does the parent company — AT&T, a telephone megacompany — put up with it?  CNN is a drag on the parent company's earnings, a thorn in its side, and a hit on its reputation.  Wouldn't a rational actor cancel the network altogether or sell it off and be done with it?  With $150 billion in debt, no wonder AT&T decided to sell the ailing network to the Discovery Network.  AT&T will no doubt benefit from getting out of politics.

CNN Admits Live On Air That Their Fact-Checking Is Based On Typing Words Into Google.  These geniuses at CNN, who have been wondering out loud how they lost 90% of their audience, admitted live on air that to debunk misinformation, they type words into Google.  The panel was talking about Senator Ron Johnson's hearing on vaccine safety when the topic of over 100 pro athletes dying of sudden heart attacks was discussed.  This greatly upset the panel at CNN where one of the 'investigative reporters' admitted he typed what was said into Google and it came back as misinformation.  [Video clip]

CNN Pushing Fake U.S. Intel Reports of Russians Stockpiling Blood on Ukraine Border, Ukranian Government Furious With DC Propaganda.  Always remember, CNN is the official "fake news" narrative engineering effort of the U.S. State Department.  The Washington Post pushes the Intelligence Community effort (CIA, etc.), and the New York Times push the FBI/DOJ (state police) effort.  Today in an effort to use Ukraine as a proxy state for war against Russia, the State Dept and CIA are claiming the Russians are amassing massive stockpiles of blood at the Ukraine border as they prepare for a protracted war.  In response the Ukraine government tells the Biden crew to knock it off with the nonsense.  This puts CNN journalists in Ukraine telling CNN journalists in the U.S. to stop telling 'fake news'.

CNN Tanking:  Six Reasons For Its Failures.  During the Gulf War in 1991, CNN shone like no other news network before.  Their access to official military footage, embedded reporters, and around-the-clock coverage of the conflict reset the standard for war reporting, and we all tuned into the network to watch America kick the crap out of Saddam Hussein.  It was at this time that CNN's slogan of "The most trusted name in news" might have been accurate.  But not anymore.  CNN's credibility is a joke, and their ratings are 'exhibit A' for that assertion.  No one is watching CNN anymore because no one believes a word that they say.  During the first week of this year, CNN's ratings were down by as much as 90% over last year in both overall viewership and in key demographics.  When nine out of ten viewers just stop tuning in, those numbers don't just represent a sharp drop, they represent an absolute freefall.  When CNN reported on the Gulf War, and the Bush-41 and Clinton Administrations, they were at least somewhat objective.  With Bush-43, they began to lift their skirt on their bias as they were often unfair in their coverage. [...] Obama was incompetent, and his administration was rife with scandal, but CNN spent eight years stroking their beloved hero.  Their clapping seals on the left ate it up, but America's moderates and conservatives saw through CNN's sycophancy.  And now that credibility crisis has reached critical mass.

CNN's 1/6 Special:  Fox News 'Relishing the Idea' of a Civil War.  For years now, the liberal media have been telling us the country is in a "cold civil war" or a "neo-civil war" because people and policies they don't like have popularity.  But according to CNN's Anderson Cooper during the network's January 6 primetime special (Live From the Capitol:  January 6th, One Year Later) it was the folks at "other networks" — aka Fox News — that were "relishing the idea" of sparking another civil war in America.  Cooper's grotesque comment came during a conversation with his panel of all Democratic members of Congress, but was specifically directed at Representatives Jason Crow (D-CO) and Ruben Gallego (D-AZ) because they both had served overseas (Crow was a captain in Army and Gallego was a corporal in the Marines).

Progressives Finally Realize That Covid Is Not a 'Moral Failing'.  Earlier this week, CNN's Chris Cillizza lamented that, throughout the pandemic, "Societally we unknowingly turned having Covid into some sort of judgment on your character."  To remedy this, Cillizza suggested, "We need to recognize that getting Covid isn't a moral failing!  It's a super infectious disease that you can protect against, sure, but can't guarantee you won't get it."  "Unknowingly"?  "We need to recognize"?  "Societally"?  Does Chris Cillizza live in a sensory-deprivation tank?  There has been nothing "unknowing" about the implication that catching Covid is evidence of a "moral failing."  It has been the core of the progressive response to the disease.  We see it every time that someone who disagrees with the maximalist approach to lockdowns, restrictions, or mandates is labeled a "Covidiot."  We see it every time the governor of Florida is described stupidly as "DeathSantis," or the governor of Texas is accused of belonging to a "death cult," or any politician or writer with a different risk calculus than Anthony Fauci is charged with wanting "to kill grandma."

Fake News CNN Reported First Omicron Death In Texas, But Hospital Says [it's] Not True.  Earlier this week CNN falsely reported that an unvaccinated Texas Man became the first American to die from the Omicron variant.  Unfortunately, it appears the Fake News network reported false information again, which in this case, has caused a lot of Americans undue stress as families are scheduled to celebrate Christmas together.  Health authorities in Texas are rejecting the story, saying instead the man died with, not because of the COVID variant.  According to The Blaze, Harris County, public health officials did not say that the patient died from the Omicron variant of COVID.  Rather, he died after testing positive for the Omicron variant.

Cracked Icons.  [Scroll down]  Think too of the now feet-of-clay, disgraced Cuomo brothers.  These were the media darlings who hammed it up on television — as thousands of New Yorkers unnecessarily died in long-term care facilities due to Governor Andrew Cuomo's decision to redirect COVID-19 patients to share facilities with the elderly and infirm. [...] His brother Chris Cuomo should have been dismissed from CNN long ago.  He likely staged a fake video showing his emergence from his COVID "quarantine" — given witnesses had seen him up and about earlier in public while infectious.  He lied on air, in denying his role as a journalist-cum-political advisor, in devising ways to use his media arrogance and contacts to save his brother's hide.  And he too was hit with sexual harassment charges.  Both shared a conviction that as leftists they enjoyed nine lives of corruption and deceit — until they ran out.

Chris Cuomo's CNN producer charged with luring girls for 'sexual' training.  A veteran CNN producer who worked "shoulder to shoulder" with now disgraced ex-anchor Chris Cuomo has been indicted on charges of luring young girls to his Vermont ski house for "sexual subservience" training.  John Griffin, of Stamford, CT, allegedly used messaging apps to befriend and persuade moms of young girls, telling them "a woman is a woman regardless of her age," and that he should be the one to "train" their daughters sexually, according to the indictment from the US Attorney of Vermont.  Griffin, 44, allegedly got at least one mom of two daughters to bring the girl to his Ludlow ski getaway, in June 2020.  It was the mom's responsibility to see that her older daughter, just 13, was "trained properly," Griffin told her, according to the indictment.

Jeff Zucker Failed To Address Serial Sexual Misconduct At CNN And Should Be Fired Immediately.  In a move more typically associated with shady politicians than a news network supposedly committed to transparency, CNN had a whopper of a news dump on Saturday night, announcing it was firing primetime news anchor Chris Cuomo.  This followed a weeklong suspension after government documents proved his involvement in covering up the sexual misconduct of his brother, disgraced former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, was much more extensive than previously known.  The emails and text exchanges released by the New York attorney general's office showed Chris Cuomo not only assisted with the public relations strategy to help his brother evade accountability, but used his relationships in the media at outlets like MSNBC and Politico — that he had gained from his job at CNN — to help him do it.  Even more shocking, it was revealed that Chris Cuomo asked for their help in digging up dirt on one survivor of his brother's sexual abuse.  Also, since Chris Cuomo's firing, at least one woman has come forward accusing Chris Cuomo himself of sexual harassment.

Good riddance to Chris Cuomo.  CNN fired Chris Cuomo this weekend. [...] CNN should have canned the younger, dumber Cuomo years ago for being an unethical, loudmouthed dimwit.  That CNN eventually fired him doesn't erase the fact it held on to him for as long as it did.  Cuomo was let go Saturday after it was revealed he had lied about the extent to which he worked behind the scenes to shield his brother, disgraced former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, from multiple allegations of sexual misconduct.  In an effort to keep the then-governor one step ahead of the scandal, the younger Cuomo leaned on his journalism connections and sources, funneling information from outside sources, including, apparently, other reporters, to warn his brother ahead of time about new allegations and developments.

The Chris Cuomo Saga Is Far From Over.  As I was waiting for my flight to be de-iced Saturday [12/4/2021] before takeoff, a few folks texted me that CNN had terminated Chris Cuomo's employment, converting his suspension into a permanent arrangement. [...] If CNN wants to uphold its dwindling integrity as a news outlet, they should explain what they knew, when they knew it, and, most importantly, why they pretended not to know it.  I doubt we'll find out any time soon.  CNN will set the terms and limits of the investigation, and has it not even released the name of the law firm conducting the investigation.  To an outsider observer, it seems CNN had to first suspend and then terminate Chris Cuomo, mainly to keep up its appearance as a legitimate news outlet and its undying service to the Democratic Party.  That doesn't make it much of a news network.

CNN fires Chris Cuomo.  CNN said Saturday [12/4/2021] that anchor Chris Cuomo has been "terminated" by the network, "effective immediately."  The announcement came after an outside law firm was retained to review information about exactly how Cuomo aided his brother, former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, when the then-governor was accused of sexual harassment.

Fredo Achieves What We All Thought Was Impossible:  A CNN Suspension.  To fully appreciate how much of a knucklehead one must be in order to be suspended from CNN, consider those who have not received such discipline.  Don Lemon has been accused of sexual assault and spent the better part of three years making crap up with the Russia Hoax, yet he hasn't been suspended.  Brian Stelter makes a fool of himself at every opportunity and has lower ratings than reruns of Green Acres, yet he hasn't been suspended.  And Jim Acosta had his press credentials taken away after brushing aside a White House staff member who tried to take back her microphone, yet Acosta was never suspended.  Even CNN Legal Analyst Jeffrey "Loobin" Toobin wasn't suspended last year after having been caught [misbehaving] on a Zoom call with colleagues from The New Yorker.

Hysterical Media Members Accuse Ron DeSantis of Building His Own 'Militia' to Prepare for 'Civil War'.  Fresh hysteria is emanating from the left after accusations that Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida is starting his own "militia" circulated this morning.  The claim originated from CNN (shocked face) via an article entitled "DeSantis Proposes a New Civilian Military Force in Florida That He Would Control."  It includes a picture of DeSantis partially overlaid on a picture of Donald Trump.  In short, we all know what CNN is insinuating here. [...] Mission accomplished for CNN, but buried deep in their article is the actual truth of what DeSantis is wanting to do.  If you go down to paragraph 8, you'll see that not only is this not some civil war militia force, but it's actually something that New York, California, and 20 other states already have.

CNN indefinitely suspends Chris Cuomo over damning AG documents.  CNN "indefinitely" suspended host Chris Cuomo on Tuesday over his secret role in trying to defend his brother, then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo, from the sexual harassment allegations that forced him from office — and for using his journalistic resources to aid that effort.  The move came a day after state Attorney General Letitia James released a trove of subpoenaed records that include texts showing the "Cuomo Prime Time" star agreed to contact news industry "sources" for advance information on damaging reports regarding his older brother.  In a prepared statement, CNN said the material "shed new light on Chris Cuomo's involvement in his brother's defense."  "The documents, which we were not privy to before their public release, raise serious questions," the network said.

Chris Cuomo Texts Show He Was Running Strategy for Big Brother's Sex Scandal.  Chris Cuomo, who repeatedly said he was not helping his brother, Gov. Andrew Cuomo, with sex allegations, was indeed helping him fight the women who came forward.  Text messages released by the New York Attorney General's office show CNN's Cuomo texting with the governor's top aide, Melissa DeRosa — a woman he said he was not regularly in touch with.  Pages of texts show differently.  Further, CNN supposedly banned Cuomo from helping his brother with the allegations.

Is Fredo Cuomo about to get whacked at CNN?  Chris "Fredo" Cuomo is one of the pampered princes at CNN whose usefulness to the network was pretty much nil after his bigger brother, Andrew Cuomo, the governor of New York, went down in disgrace.  Now it comes to light that he was engaged in some despicable conflict-of-interest behavior that, as Rolling Stone noted, "would get any other journalist fired." [...] And this is far from all he did as Gov. Sonny's personal public relations handler on the sly.  Rolling Stone also reports that he helped craft statements, advised his brother to dig in instead of get out, and couldn't stop repeatedly lying about it, both to his CNN listeners and apparently, to his CNN bosses, although that's kind of uncertain.  Note that Fredo-like plea in the passage above to the big guys to "trust" him.  What we do see now is that CNN, or at least some people there, are trying to pitch him over the side.

CNN Reports Cars Have Advanced From Looting to Terrorism and Murder.  Last week NBC and California media reported that cars were responsible for looting and general mayhem in/around the San Francisco shopping districts.  "Just before 9 p.m. dozens of cars pulled up to 1200 Broadway Plaza to block off the street and rush into store."  "About 25 cars just blocked the street and rushed into the Walnut Creek Nordstrom making off with goods before getting in cars and speeding away," Hernandez said on Twitter.  Today, CNN announces that cars have become even more violent:  "Waukesha will hold a moment of silence ... one week since a car drove through a city Christmas parade".

CNN Analyst Has 'No Idea' What's Behind 'Smash and Grab' Robberies — Then Gives up the Answer.  A CNN analyst — a former Philadelphia police commissioner and CNN senior law enforcement analyst, no less — serves up a perfect example of why CNN's ratings continue to swirl down the toilet at breakneck speed.  Simply put, can't make it up; don't have to.  And the best part is they totally don't get it.  Or do they? [...] As we've reported, flash-mob robberies, so-called "smash and grabs," which are rampant [...] in many Democrat-run cities across America, have become all the rage.  As is the case with any important issue facing the country, the key question is why are they occurring and what do have to do to stop them?  In what can only be described as "the genius of CNN," the above-mentioned analyst, Charles Ramsey, has pondered the same question.  While the former police commissioner and law enforcement analyst claims to have "no idea" why the wave of robberies continues to occur (utter nonsense; of course he knows exactly why the robberies continue to occur), he did manage to provide the answer while pretending to be clueless.

Brooks CNN fake
CNN Is Lightening The Skin Color Of Waukesha Terrorist Darrell Brooks.  A driver who plowed an SUV into the Waukesha, WI Christmas Parade killing 5 and injuring 40 on Sunday evening has been identified as Darrell Edward, Brooks.  Age 39. [...] However, the mainstream media is trying to cover up for Darrell as they call the attack an accident and they are alleging that he was running away from a knife attack!  We all know that's not true but CNN tried to do the impossible, they even tried to make Brooks look like he has a lighter skin color!  Here's the CNN image which is lighter than any other image on the internet: [Photo]


CNN Flip Flopped on A Ridiculous Amount of Lies they Spewed About Kyle Rittenhouse, Saving Face?  Just two minutes after the Kyle Rittenhouse trial ended CNN ran a video admitting a lot of the claims they made over the last year were in fact completely wrong.  Listen as this news reporter goes through a long list of things CNN once claimed were wrong are now proven to be 100% accurate.  CNN even lists several things they themselves made up were in fact wrong.  [Video clip]

Alan Dershowitz Offers To Help Kyle Rittenhouse Sue The Living Daylights Out Of CNN.  On Friday evening [11/19/2021], Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz offered his own personal research of CNN's slanderous coverage of Kyle Rittenhouse so the 18-year old can pursue legal action against them. [...] "They heard a case of white supremacists crossing state lines with an AR-15 who had no business being in the place that he went to.  He was not chased and had no fear for his life.  That's what CNN told their viewers.  I hope that Rittenhouse sues CNN," he continued.  "I will make an offer.  I will share my research about CNN with Rittenhouse and his lawyers.  I am suing CNN because they totally distorted and edited a tape of my defense of President Trump.  They have a history of distorting facts to present a narrative.  I think that you have to distinguish between opinions and facts.  You can't see somebody for calling Rittenhouse a vigilante.  That's an opinion.  You can sue them for saying he crossed state lines with an illegal weapon or he was a white supremacist.  I am a strong supporter of the First Amendment that CNN and others have to be held accountable for lying about individuals and creating an expectation of a conviction in a case where there was no possibility of a conviction for anybody who saw the trial live on television,"he added.

Network anchor laughably tweets photo of supermarket milk aisle as proof supply chain is fine.  Supply chain problems?  What supply chain problems?  Brian Stelter's milk aisle is fine, after all.  That's seriously the take the host of CNN's "Reliable Sources" had.  In a Saturday tweet, Stelter tried to convince social media users our supply chain was in great shape all because there was plenty of milk at his local Wegmans.  The roundly mocked tweet featured a picture of what appeared to be Stelter's wife looking through the refrigerated section at the supermarket.

CNN Has an Unbelievable Take on Your Basic Right to Defend Yourself.  We've seen a lot of bad media takes when it comes to the Rittenhouse case but we can always count on CNN to deliver some more.  This segment with John Berman, Brianna Keilar, and Don Lemon is something else.  [Video clip]  Keilar talks about "white vigilantism" and compares the Rittenhouse case to the Ahmaud Arbery case.  This is offensive because the Rittenhouse case has nothing to do with race and nothing to do with the Ahmaud Arbery case.  Comparing the two and talking about vigilantism is an indication that Keilar has no idea about the facts in this case.  But what is the big offense that Kyle Rittenhouse committed in the left's mind besides shooting people?  It's that he dared to help people defend their property.

Senator Rick Scott destroys a CNN Host with Facts she Can't Rebuke.  CNN along with many in the leftist media continue to gaslight American's by telling them Critical Race Theory aka CRT is not being taught in schools.  The only problem for them is a plethora of parents nationwide who have the proof directly from their sons and daughters homework that shows it is much more prevalent than they would like us to believe.  Watch as Senator Rick Scott uses Biden's own website in order to combat the fact that CRT is not only being taught, but that CNN along with their leftist cohorts in the media, are either lying about it not being taught, or completely clueless as to what is really going on.  Either way, it was a bad day for CNN's Brianna Keilar.  [Video clip]

Boston Bombing Scripted Actor turns out to be CNN's favorite so-called Covid "expert" Dr. Leana Wen (opinion).  Acting involves the ability to enter into another character, memorize lines, show confidence while the camera is rolling, and use dramatic "techniques" to engage with an audience.  Recall back in April of 2013, when the Boston Marathon bombing occurred, crisis actor videos went viral, and the acting of many players was so bad that many Americans began questioning if the news media were lying, just as a government-run litmus test for martial law in the suburbs of Boston was being rolled out.  Guess who was there, lying through her teeth, in her debut acting performance?  None other than CNN's favorite actress, talking head and scamdemic promoter, Dr. Leana Wen.  After the Boston Bombing, television news went to town, pushing fear of a domestic terrorist attack that would require military brigades to roll through Boston suburbs, enter people's homes without warrants, and search for two dudes who supposedly made a pressure cooker bomb and set it off near the marathon's finish line.  America's FBI were all over it.  Emotions ran high as fake newscasters hyped up what really happened in order to broadcast mass hysteria.  Watch one of the worst crisis actors ever get her first "15 seconds" in the limelight, preparing her for eight years later when she would push the covid plandemic on the Counterfeit News Network.  Here's the crisis actor on the scene just after the infamous Boston Marathon Bombing:  [Video clip]

CNN Slams 'Faulty Media Narrative' Of Border Patrol Whipping Haitians (Which It Pushed For A Week).  After spending a full week promoting the discredited story that Border Patrol agents whipped illegal immigrants from Haiti attempting to cross the U.S. border in Texas, CNN pushed back against the "faulty media narrative" — without retracting, or even mentioning, its own misstatements.  CNN media correspondent Brian Stelter, media reporter Oliver Darcy, and news anchor Jake Tapper all addressed the erroneous reports emanating from social media.  "How can DHS claim to have an independent investigation into these Border Patrol agents, when the president says, quote, 'Those people will pay,' and you say the images 'horrified us'?" Tapper questioned Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas on Sunday's "State of the Union."  Mayorkas doubled down that "what those images suggest, what they appeared to portray, was horrifying."  "But that's the thing," Tapper responded.  "Some of the initial descriptions of those images were just patently false.  There's now video out there that provides more context.  Having seen the video, are you certain that there was actually wrongdoing?"

Rasmussen Reports confronts CNN over 'deceptive' poll on Trump's future in the Party.  Rasmussen Reports, which has a reputation for being a highly accurate polling firm, took CNN to task over what it called a "deceptive" recent survey regarding what "most Republicans" think about a potential 2024 run by former President Donald Trump.  The polling firm was responding to the findings contained in a story headlined, "Most Republicans want Trump as the GOP's leader but are divided about whether he'd help them retake the White House," which was published Sunday [9/12/2021].

No, 'Anti-Vax' Republicans Are Not To Blame For The Weakening Economy.  CNN contributor Jill Filipovic must have a direct line to the PR shop inside the Biden White House.  That would explain her desperate attempt a few days ago to blame Republicans for the worrisome economic signs we are seeing.  Expect more of this sort of fact-free nonsense as the economy struggles in the weeks and months ahead.  "The American economy is weakening," Filipovic begins.  She notes, correctly, that job gains in August were way below forecast and Goldman Sachs just downgraded its projection for GDP growth for the year.  "And we know who is responsible."  It won't surprise anyone to learn that a writer for CNN is going to point a finger at those evil anti-vax insurrectionist Trump-loving Republicans. [...] Let's be clear.  The reason the economy is struggling is that Biden decided to abandon every pro-growth Trump policy.  Inflation is rising because Biden is deficit-spending with abandon.  And he's just getting started.

CNN exhibit
Few topics create as much hypocrisy as executive use of power.  [Compare] how the press has covered Biden's vaccine mandate announcement vs.  Trump's threat to override governors on houses of worship.  Spot the difference?  Back in May 2020, President Trump said he would override governors who wouldn't allow houses of worship to open.  Yesterday, President Biden said he would do the same about governors who wouldn't enforce a vaccine mandate.  Can you spot the difference in how @CNN covered it?


CNN's Ward:  Taliban 'Chanting 'Death to America' but They Seem Friendly at the Same Time'.  Monday [8/16/2021] on CNN's "New Day," network chief international correspondent Clarissa Ward delivered a report from the streets of Kabul, Afghanistan, after Afghanistan President Ashraf Ghani reportedly fled the country upon the arrival of Taliban forces.  Ward said it is "clear" the Taliban is now back in "charge" of Afghanistan.  "As soon as we leave our compound, it's clear who is now in charge," Ward stated in a report.  "Taliban fighters have flooded the capital.  Smiling and victorious, they took this city of 6 million people in a matter of hours — barely firing a shot.  This is a sight I honestly thought I would never see: scores of Taliban fighters, and just behind us, the U.S. embassy compound.  Some carry American weapons.  They tell us they're here to maintain law and order."

'Healthy' 40-year-old
Healthy 40 year old COVID victim's last words, "I blame the Unvaccinated".

Healthy?


CNN Reporter in Kabul:  "They're Just Chanting 'Death to America' But They Seem Friendly at the Same Time".  A CNN reporter in Kabul asserted during a live shot that "they're just chanting 'death to America,' but they seem friendly."  The ridiculous segment reminded many of when a CNN anchor reported that the riots in Minneapolis were "fiery, but mostly peaceful" as the city burned around him.

Now Chris Cuomo must go too.  One down.  One to go.  Now that Andrew Cuomo has resigned, his brother, Chris, must be next.  They are, after all, both guilty of gross ethics violations.  Before his "long-planned vacation" this week, it has been positively Orwellian to watch, night after night, CNN's highest-rated primetime host blatantly ignore this huge, developing bombshell of a story, simply because he'd rather not — while informing upper management that he would continue to advise his brother, who also faces criminal charges and civil lawsuits.  I highly doubt Andrew's resignation will impact Chris' advisory status.  His brother, after all, is still in crisis.  Chris "promised not to discuss Andrew Cuomo's strategic response to the scandal with any government official besides the governor himself," the New York Times reported.

CNN Host Says Conservatives Are 'Demonizing Immigrants As Diseased' COVID Spreaders.  Here Are Some Facts.  CNN host Brianna Keilar on Monday [8/9/2021] blamed conservatives for "demonizing immigrants as diseased spreaders" of the coronavirus, saying that there are "no facts" to back up the claim that illegal immigrants at the southern border spread the pathogen.  "There is a crisis on the border," Keilar acknowledged Monday on CNN's New Day. [...]Last week, the Texas border city of McAllen said that more than 7,000 migrants who tested positive for the coronavirus have been released by Customs and Border Protection into the city since February.  More than 1,500 migrants with the virus have been allowed into McAllen over the past week, the city said.  Single adults and some families have been sent back over the border under Title 42, which allows migrants who were recently in a country where a contagious disease was present to be expelled.  However, unaccompanied children and migrant families with young children are being processed by U.S. border authorities and then into U.S. communities.

Meghan McCain blasts Chris Cuomo for 'the worst kind of nepotism' over Andrew Cuomo coverage.  "The View" co-host Meghan McCain on Wednesday [8/4/2021] slammed Chris Cuomo as an example of "the worst kind of nepotism" after the CNN host failed to cover the sexual harassment scandal engulfing his brother, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo.  The daughter of late Arizona Sen. John McCain was referencing a debate about nepotism she had on "The View" last week when she commented on the scathing official report into the allegations against the governor during Wednesday morning's show.  "You want to talk about nepotism?," McCain said, "Not having to talk about the biggest scandal in the country when it has to do with your brother and you're hosting CNN, that's nepotism."  "The Cuomo family and CNN are the worst kind of nepotism that the media has an example of," she railed.

CNN women stay silent on Chris Cuomo after damning depiction in AG report.  As critics call for CNN prime-time host Chris Cuomo to face consequences for moonlighting as an adviser to his governor brother over sexual harassment claims, the network's sizable stable of female talent has so far kept quiet about their colleague's role in the political and media scandal of the year.  An analysis of show transcripts by Fox News Thursday found that none of CNN's female anchors or on-air contributors had raised the "Cuomo Prime Time" host's ethically dubious actions outlined in a bombshell report released Tuesday by New York Attorney General Letitia James.  While CNN is the only one of the big three cable news networks not to have a female prime-time host, their regular lineup features anchors and reporters including Christine Romans, Alisyn Camerota, Brianna Keilar, Kate Bolduan, Erin Burnett, Dana Bash, Pamela Brown, and Ana Cabrera.

Biden Attacks Alarmist COVID News Stories — Even As He Stokes Them.  CNN might be a horribly biased and woefully unreliable news organization these days, but its reporters do know how to convey the White House propaganda well.  Case in point is the story posted on CNN's website over the weekend about how the Biden administration is desperately trying to get the news media to stop playing up the risk of the Delta variant.  "The White House is frustrated with what it views as alarmist, and in some instances flat-out misleading, news coverage about the Delta variant," reported Oliver Darcy over the weekend.  "That's according to two senior Biden administration officials I spoke with Friday, both of whom requested anonymity to candidly offer their opinion on coverage of the CDC data released that suggests vaccinated Americans who become infected with the Delta coronavirus variant can infect others as easily as those who are unvaccinated."  Darcy goes on to provide a multitude of examples of how the White House berated various news agencies for their coverage of the CDC report that prompted its mask-wearing mandate for vaccinated people.

Jake Tapper Claims Election Lies Are Comparable To Denying The Holocaust.  CNN's Jake Tapper claimed in an interview published Wednesday [7/28/2021] that lies about the 2020 presidential election are comparable to denying the Holocaust.  The anchor was interviewed by Mother Jones Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery, where he was asked about the "Big Lie."  Tapper said he would not book Republicans on his show who claimed widespread voter fraud caused the 2020 presidential election to be "stolen" from former President Donald Trump.

CNN Continues Its Hindenburg-Like Burn in Losing Viewers With Release of New Ratings.  The network that used to brand itself the "Most Trusted Name in News" and was once the leader of the pack in cable news is now being beaten continuously by its rivals.  Possibly, activists posing as journalists is not the ratings juggernaut some thought it would be in Atlanta.  Beginning the week of July 5th, CNN viewership dropped by 19% with both overall eyeballs on the channel and with the main advertiser target of 25-54 segment of the population.  Even more shocking is their morning news show "New Day" which hit a new low in the crucial demographic of 25-54, with only 76,000 people watching.

CNN Says "Tucker Carlson is the New Alex Jones".  CNN hosts Brian Stelter and Oliver Darcy asserted that "Tucker Carlson is the new Alex Jones" during Stelter's show after they played clips where Carlson's rhetoric was similar to Jones' on several different issues.  After Stelter asked Darcy about the comparison, Darcy remarked, "Tucker Carlson is the new Alex Jones — if you watch Tucker Carlson's program and you watch Alex Jones' program — they might differ a little bit in antics and the way they deliver their message, but that message to viewers is consistent and it's pretty identical."  Darcy went on to claim that Carlson mirrored Jones in pushing "vaccine conspiracy theories, false flag conspiracy theories, deep state conspiracy theories."

CNN, MSNBC's ratings collapse due to 'serious credibility problem' covering Biden, experts say.  The second quarter of 2021 saw viewers ditch CNN and MSNBC in droves as experts wonder if the liberal networks can ever recover from a "serious credibility problem" they created by relying on former President Donald Trump for success while ignoring internal gaffes and scandals.  "CNN and MSNBC were one-trick ponies, and that trick was bashing Trump," Cornell Law School professor and media critic William A. Jacobson told Fox News.  "Now that Trump no longer is president, they have tried to keep up the mania, but it's hard.  The audience has disappeared because it never was loyal to CNN and MSNBC hosts, it was loyal to Trump hatred," Jacobson added.  "It's not hard to imagine executives at CNN and MSNBC saying nightly prayers that Trump runs for president in 2024."

CNN Continues to Circle the Drain.  When it rains, it pours.  And when it comes to ratings at the Jeffrey Zucker-led clown show known as CNN, it's a monsoon.  The second quarter's ratings came out on Tuesday [6/29/2021] and the immature, noxious, and repugnant network suffered its worst month in total viewers and the 25-54 demo since June 2019.  And that's not to mention that primetime ratings have tumbled 71 percent in total viewers and 78 percent in the demo since January.  Meanwhile, the Fox News Channel continued to assert its dominance over the competition with its 78th consecutive quarter leading cable news and sixth straight win in all of cable, led in part due to the continued success of shows like The Five, Gutfeld!, and Tucker Carlson Tonight.  But for CNN, it's more of the same and, for some reason, they're okay with it.  In addition to the decrease in primetime, Nielsen Media Research also showed that CNN has hemorrhaged 69 percent of its total day viewership across all ages and an astounding 75 percent in the 25-54 bracket.

CNN Fails to Disclose Poll Was Funded by Silicon Valley Billionaire.  CNN failed to disclose in a story published last week that the "nonpartisan" group that funded polls released last Thursday which purport to show "just how far Republicans were willing to go to support then-President Donald Trump's unprecedented efforts to subvert the 2020 election," is also the parent organization of an obscure nonprofit that helped the Mark Zuckerberg-funded Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL) recruit local election officials to accept controversial private funding of election administration.

Australian Media Tears American Media Apart Over Its Fawning Over Biden.  American media is so infected with leftism that it's ideologically slanted to the point of tipping over and it's highly possible that the media doesn't even know it.  It doesn't have the ability to look at itself critically, and we get very real moments where the media asks Democrats what it can do to better help them along while on air.  The media in other countries can see it, though, and Australia's, in particular, can't help but dedicate a segment to it.  On a segment during Sky News's Kenny on Media, Australian anchors and commentators took aim at the American media for its simpering and fawning over Joe Biden during the G7 summit while the same media bashed President Donald Trump in 2018 against all reason.  Taking aim at CNN, in particular, the anchor compared the network reporting on Biden in 2021 vs. Trump in 2018.  The difference was absolutely striking, with CNN saying that Trump was in opposition to every world leader around him, while everything about Biden seemed perfect and without trouble.

CNN's Brian Stelter roasted by C-SPAN callers: 'Biggest minister of misinformation I have ever heard'.  CNN's Brian Stelter was mocked by callers who referred the media pundit as a "minister of misinformation" and evoked disgraced former CNN darling Michael Avenatti during an appearance on C-SPAN's "Washington Journal" on Thursday [6/9/2021].  "Mr. Stelter is the biggest minister of misinformation I have ever heard and I'm a news junkie," a caller identified as Kevin from Indiana told the liberal CNN host.  "This gentleman told the American people, and his news organization... for four years that there was Russia collusion and actually, after all the $35-$40 million dollars and government investigation, we come to find out there was zero.  Zero collusion from the Trump administration and Russia," the caller continued.  "His stories absolutely evolve."

CNN's Jim Acosta Reacts Badly to Lafayette Park Report, and We're About to Make His Day Even Worse.  As we anticipated, the heartbreak over the just-released Inspector General's detailed report on the events that took place on June 1, 2020 at Lafayette Park in Washington, D.C. is very real for CNN's Jim Acosta.  And we're about to make his day much worse — without apology. [...]Acosta, a performative "reporter" who featured prominently in many a planned dust-up between reporters and the Trump White House back in the day, did not take to the Twitter machine last night to post his reaction to the news.  Instead, he weighed in during this morning's "New Day" broadcast, one of the lowest-rated programs on the struggling network.  During the segment, Acosta — who was one of the lead false narrative drivers on what was originally claimed to have happened last year, sought to cast doubt on the report, proclaiming that "it raises more questions than it answers" and suggesting it was a "whitewash" from an IG who he said "sounded" as though he was "auditioning to become the Inspector General at Mar-A-Lago."

Chickens come home; roost.
CNN's viewership skids so low it's embarrassing.  [Scroll down]   Here's the nasty reality that is hitting them:  Their bad ratings then were a ceiling, not a floor, and now that they've got what they wanted, a Trump-free America, their ratings are spiraling without a bottom.  This comes at a bad time, given that all of the major cable news networks are seeing some level of lost viewership, too.  That's the broad trend, a down-market, as they say, so it's all happening against what those in the stock market call "headwinds."  They're all doing bad, but CNN has done far more poorly the others, a laggard in a lagging market[.]  Several things come to mind to explain this travesty.  One, they've got nothing but contempt for their leftist viewers.  They're down to stupid stunts targeting their own viewers in a bid to goose up viewership.

CNN ratings hit new low in April.  Nielson ratings are out, showing an abysmal drop in viewership for CNN in the month of April.  Since January, total viewership has dropped 71%.  Within the 25-54 demographic, CNN snagged 798,000 primetime viewers and 530,000 total day viewers as recently as January.  Now, they only reached 229,000 during primetime and 152,000 in total day views.

The Editor says...
CNN was much more interesting when it was transmitted in the clear and was being picked up by hobbyists with C-band satellite dishes.  The result was often a noisy analog signal that was susceptible to rain fades.  Now the signal is all digital, from Atlanta to your house, the picture is crystal clear HD, and nobody watches it.  Maybe that's because CNN gradually shifted from 24-hour journalism to annoying left-wing political activism.

CNN drops Rick Santorum over 'racist' comments.  CNN ended its contract with Rick Santorum after the former Republican senator and two-time presidential candidate made "inaccurate" and "racist" remarks about Native Americans, according to a report.  A senior CNN executive told the Huffington Post Saturday [5/22/2021] that the network parted ways with Santorum, a political commentator, earlier this week, even as the former Pennsylvania senator tried to explain his comments that "there was nothing" in the US before the arrival of European colonizers on one of the network's shows earlier this month.  Santorum went on "Cuomo Prime Time" to explain that he "misspoke" in a speech to a conservative youth group in April.

Poynter Institute Rebukes CNN's Chris Cuomo for Advising Brother Governor on Damage Control.  The Poynter Institute for Media Studies has published a harsh reprimand of CNN anchor Chris Cuomo Thursday for his taking part in strategy sessions advising his brother, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, amid the fallout from the governor's sexual misconduct allegations.  Poyter's Tom Jones argued that Chris Cuomo was "deservedly under scrutiny for crossing a journalistic line" following revelations that he took part in advisory calls with Andrew Cuomo and some of his staff members, with Jones calling the situation "a conflict of interest that has been more than a year in the making."  "Stop and think about what happened here," Jones wrote.  "The host of a primetime show on one of the country's biggest and most influential cable news networks is advising one of the most powerful and influential politicians in this country on how to handle serious sexual misconduct allegations."

Don Lemon Claims Democratic Party Is The Only One 'Living In Reality' And Also That He Is A 'Journalist'.  CNN host Don Lemon slammed the Republican party on CNN Friday, saying that they are not "operating in reality" and are "obsolete."  "Well, right now, the person who is in the White House is a Democrat," Lemon said.  "The people who are in charge of Congress are Democrats.  The people who are in the majority, slightly, in the Senate, are Democrats.  The only party, now, that is operating in reality, is the Democratic party."  "The Republican party is obsolete," he continued.  "The Republican party is not dealing and living in reality.  So, you cannot negotiate with a party that doesn't operate on logic."

Chris Cuomo proves that nothing will get you fired from CNN if you're liberal.  If there's an ethics watchdog at CNN, he must be as dead as Old Yeller.  If there's a referee making sure CNN employees play by the rules, his vision is about as reliable as Oedipus's.  We know that CNN is capable of firing conservatives, since they axed commentator Jeffrey Lord for making a joke suggesting his opponents were Nazis.  But if you're a Democrat, is there any level of ethical transgression that might cost you a gig at CNN?  Conservatives have long complained that CNN is a propaganda organ of the Democratic Party.  It's no longer possible for the network to deny this, now that we know that Chris Cuomo, one of its prime-time anchors, is also a member of Andrew Cuomo's crisis-management team, taking part in strategy sessions this year with the governor's aides, flacks and lawyers as the Perv of Albany tried to figure out how to survive all the sexual-harassment charges against him.

CNN Hilariously Nukes [its] Own Narrative With Report From Incomplete Border Wall.  For a hopelessly biased "news" outlet with ratings swirling down the toilet on a daily basis, the notion that CNN actually believes that ridiculous self-proclaimed bi-line is so, um, CNN.  You can't make that up, but you don't have to — CNN's got you covered. [...] This is reality — vs. the herculean attempts by CNN, MSNBC, and other Democrat Party water carriers to portray illegal crossings primarily as starving unaccompanied children found huddled under some rock.  A bit of snark, there, but the point is accurate.

This CNN Contributor Hates Israel So Much, He Praises Hitler For Killing Jews.  On Sunday, about a week into a budding war between Israel and Palestine, a CNN contributor in Pakistan by the name of Adeel Raja declared, "The world today needs a Hitler." Raja has a long history of supporting the late Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler, sometimes explicitly mentioning what Hitler did to the Jews — a reference to the unspeakable horrors of the Holocaust.  Raja has deleted the tweet, but Greg Price and Benny Johnson kept the receipts.  CNN issued a brief statement on the matter on Sunday evening, distancing the network from Raja.  "The world today needs a Hitler," Raja posted on Twitter Sunday afternoon. [... Update:] CNN released a statement to Yashar Ali, a contributor to New York magazine and HuffPost.  "As a freelancer, his reporting contributed to some newsgathering efforts from Islamabad.  However, in light of these abhorrent statements, he will not be working with CNN again in any capacity," the network said.

Outrage after social media users discover series of Hitler-praising tweets from CNN freelancer.  CNN is under fire for having hired a writer who posted several times on social media that he believes the world needs another "Hitler."  Social media users demanded that the network respond after discovering the tweets from one of its freelance contributors, Adeel Raja, who has written dozens of pieces for the outlet.  After some digging, it turned out to be one of several messages Raja has posted praising the Nazi leader.

Desperate Don Lemon 'apologizes' after teasing 'end' of his show in duplicitous publicity stunt.  Is planting misleading innuendo about oneself a good tool to sell the services of an information provider?  In what other product category does one openly debase the quality as a means of gathering attention?  Tucker Carlson, whose viewership is more than 4 times that of Don Lemon's, likes to characterize the CNN host as stupid.  That label certainly applies to the publicity stunt trick Lemon pulled on Friday night [5/14/2021].

How Chris Cuomo Hitched Himself to Rebekah Jones' Sinking Ship of Lies.  Last year, a website operator for the Florida Department of Health, Rebekah Jones became the liberal media's new Michael Avenatti when she started claiming she was fired for disobeying orders to manipulate COVID data.  And since she was attacking Republican Governor Ron DeSantis, CNN Prime Time host Chris Cuomo eagerly promoted her claims as it provided a distraction from his brother, Governor Andrew Cuomo's (D-NY) own COVID data manipulation.  That was, until he dropped her once she got arrested.  Jones was back in the news Thursday [5/13/2021] after National Review's Charles C. W. Cooke published a brutal takedown of her claims, actually detailing how and why she was fired.  So, NewsBusters thought this was the perfect time to look back at how Chris "Fredo" Cuomo rolled out the welcome mat for the lunacy several times over the course of 2020.

CNN Comedy Hour With Jim AcostaCNN Newsroom with Jim Acosta is more of an extended sit-down comedy routine than an actual news program.  Over the past several weeks, Acosta has been using his platform on CNN to unleash a barrage of painfully crafted knee-slappers, most of them aimed at former president Donald Trump and Fox News host Tucker Carlson.  His ratings might be in the gutter, but Acosta's tortured comedy routine is presumably a smash hit with his target audience of #Resistance wine moms.

Media Outlet Identified! — CNN Is Caught Outside AZ Audit Center Parking Lot Harassing State Audit Workers.  On Friday night [4/30/2021] The Gateway Pundit Jordan Conradson interviewed Arizona Audit Director Ken Bennett on the latest developments in the historic Maricopa County forensic audit.  Ken gave The Gateway Pundit an exclusive on the historic audit that continued Friday at Veterans Memorial Coliseum in Phoenix.  Ken Bennett also dropped this bomb during the interview.  The liberal media is attempting to dox the audit workers!  [Video clip]

CNN Sends Narrative Engineers to Maricopa County Arizona to Frame Extremist Narrative.  Things are escalating in Maricopa County Arizona as the first week of the ballot audit comes to a close.  After democrats lost several court challenges; and after a state judge affirms the right of the Arizona Senate to conduct an audit; CNN has dispatched their hit-team to document the workers and frame an extremist narrative.

CNN 'fact checker' provides cover for violent BLM protesters at Iowa state Capitol.  Black Lives Matter protesters were kicked out of the Iowa state Capitol at an organized protest this month after turning violent and allegedly assaulting a police officer.  They intending to "kill" several so-called "racist" bills at the statehouse, one which would increase riot-related penalties.  Yesterday, Black Lives Matter protesters stormed the Iowa State Capitol to try and "kill" legislative bills they opposed (their event was called "Kill the racist bills"). Josephine Mulvihill was arrested & charged with assaulting an officer.  CNN "fact checker" Daniel Dale suggested that the left-wing demonstrators did not storm state grounds and acted within the legal terms of the protest permit granted to gather outside the Capitol and in the building's first floor Rotunda.

CNN Laughs, Accuses Sen. Tim Scott of Tokenism, an Uncle Tom for GOP.  Casual racism was the disgusting tone CNN decided to go with following South Carolina Senator Tim Scott's delivery of the Republican response to President Biden's address to Congress Wednesday night.  Together, chief political correspondent Dana Bash and senior political correspondent Abby Phillip cackled as they attacked Scott as a liar for defending Republican election integrity efforts and dispelling the false notion they were worse than Jim Crow.  As Bash was getting into her reaction to Scott's rebuttal, she started to give a wink and nudge to Scott's supposed status as a token black by noting his "brand" and "unique voice in the Republican Party."  She went on to essentially suggest Scott was being an Uncle Tom for defending something that was allegedly "worse than Jim Crow".

Like A Fuzzy Koala Bear, CNN's Sour Grapes Are Adorable But Dangerous.  CNN's sour grapes are fermenting into a pathetic, albeit amusing, daily display.  Watching the channel smugly attempt to punch up at Fox News almost evokes the same empathy you feel when watching a toddler try to grab cookies off a too-tall counter.  They just don't have what it takes, but don't you dare try to tell them otherwise.  Enter Brianna Keilar, the newly minted "anchor" of "New Day," the network's morning program.  One of her first monologues on the program sought to analyze Fox News's chyrons for allegedly revealing that "Fox is not news, no matter what it calls itself."  The irony is entirely lost on Keilar, who is simply not an "anchor," no matter what she calls herself.  The entire package feels like a j-school lightweight auditioning for Rachel Maddow's job, replete with facile jabs that lack logic as much as self-awareness.

'That is a campaign violation': Donald Trump tells Sean Hannity CNN broke law.  Donald Trump has accused CNN of committing a 'campaign violation' after a technical director with the network admitted on camera that they stood in opposition to his presidency.  The former president spoke to Sean Hannity of Fox News, and was asked what he thought of a sting carried out by Project Veritas, a conservative watchdog group.  An undercover reporter met the CNN camera operative through a dating app, and then filmed him discussing the network's approach. [...] 'What they are doing is a massive campaign violation.  When you look at what they did.'  Trump, who has been at war with social media companies since he was removed from their platforms following the January Capitol riot, called for more regulation of their operations.  He said they were biased towards Democrats, and needed more scrutiny.

On CNN, "Town Hall" means "one-sided Democrat infomercial."
CNN plans climate change town hall after staffer reveals plan to sell climate 'fear' in leaked recording.  CNN is set to host a live town hall with senior Biden administration officials this weekend on the topic of climate change, weeks after a network employee told an undercover journalist the network planned to push "fear" about the issue.  The town hall, moderated by CNN anchor Dana Bash, will focus on "The Climate Crisis" and will air on Friday night to mark this year's celebration of Earth Day, the network announced.  The participants include Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry, White House National Climate Advisor Gina McCarthy, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Michael Regan and Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm, all of whom will be asked about Biden's campaign promise to remake American climate policy.

Chauvin called a 'serial murderer' on CNN, baffled hosts scramble to clarify.  CNN Newsroom hosts scrambled to save their segment on Tuesday [4/20/2021] after a guest called former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin a "serial murderer."  "We talk a lot.  It's a network," host Victor Blackwell said to Minneapolis activist Leslie E. Redmond.  "What is the conversation that we are not having that we should be?"  Redmond, former president of the Minneapolis NAACP, replied, "You know, Chauvin, who is a serial murderer, just so we're clear, he's murdered numerous people in Minneapolis.  He's part of a bigger system.  When he's held accountable, he'll be the first white male officer held accountable for murdering a black person in the state of Minnesota."

CNN Actually Defends Maxine Waters For 'Inciting' Anti-Police Violence.  Here is yet another reason why no one should take CNN seriously.  The same network that has accused the GOP of "genocide" and ending the country" for violence from Trump supporters on January 6, spent this morning defending a Democrat for what many would call, openly encouraging violence from left-wing protesters (while intimidating a jury!)  California Democrat Maxine Waters went to Minneapolis this weekend to encourage Black Lives Matter protesters to ignore curfews and get more "confrontational" if the jury does not find Derek Chauvin, guilty of murder.  She added, "We've got to make sure that they know that we mean business" and that they would "not go away" if he was acquitted.  Waters made these comments after several days of violent riots and just hours before the Minnesota National Guard and police were shot at in a drive-by shooting in Minneapolis.  After several Republicans called out the Democrat for "inciting violence", CNN's New Day spent two segments attacking the GOP instead.  During the 7 am hour, co-host John Berman went on a tirade ripping Senator Ted Cruz [R-TX] for calling out Waters.

Brian Stelter melts under pressure from Project Veritas journo.  Far-left CNN political commentator Brian Stelter grew visibly irate like a giant, angry polar bear (one in flip-flops and shorts, that is) when investigative journalists with Project Veritas recorded themselves confronting him inside the hallway of a New York City high-rise apartment building.  It's not clear if the building was Stelter's home.  In case it was, it should be noted that his employer, CNN, has shown no qualms about confronting people at their homes.  Uploaded to YouTube and Rumble on Friday, the video footage began with a journalist approaching Stelter and casually asking how he was doing.  Stelter responded in kind and seemed cheery and upbeat as usual up until the moment the tough questions began.  [Video clip]

Twitter suspends Project Veritas founder James O'Keefe after undercover scoops on CNN's pro-Biden, BLM & Covid-19 propaganda.  Twitter has banned Project Veritas founder James O'Keefe for alleged violation of its policies on "platform manipulation and spam," silencing his account amid a series of undercover scoops on CNN's propagandist tactics.  The social media giant told O'Keefe on Thursday [4/15/2021] that his account was permanently suspended and will not be reinstated, citing an allegation that he used fake or multiple accounts to manipulate conversations on the platform.  Twitter said in a statement to The Hill and other media outlets that "you can't artificially amplify or disrupt conversations through the use of multiple accounts."  The shutdown came after O'Keefe posted three straight days of scoops in which CNN technical director Charlie Chester is shown on video, talking to an undercover reporter.  Chester, who reportedly thought he was talking to a Tinder date, told the reporter about CNN's propagandist efforts to oust President Donald Trump, its fearmongering about Covid-19 to boost ratings and its efforts to make Black Lives Matter look good.

CNN staffer says network 'trying to help' Black Lives Matter in secretly recorded video.  Project Veritas continued to cause headaches for CNN on Thursday when it published another secretly recorded video featuring network technical director Charles Chester discussing how his employer manipulates coverage to fit its liberal agenda.  "I was trying to do some research on, like, the Asian hate, like the people are getting attacked and whatnot.  A bunch of Black men have been attacking Asians.  I'm like 'What are you doing?  Like, we are trying to help BLM,'" Chester said in the video.  Chester noted that "conservatives" would pounce if it was reported that Black people were the ones committing hate crimes because it wouldn't coincide with the Black Lives Matter movement.

Twitter Bans James O'Keefe After Latest Round of Hidden Videos Exposing CNN — O'Keefe to Sue Twitter for Defamation.  Twitter banned Project Veritas founder James O'Keefe after he posted multiple videos exposing CNN's left-wing bias.  Project Veritas on Thursday [4/15/2021] released a third bombshell undercover video of CNN Director Charlie Chester admitting that the network is "trying to help" Black Lives Matter by protecting their narrative on race.  Chester admits that they have only been pushing stories that implicate white people, during a conversation with a Tinder date that ended up being a Project Veritas reporter.  Chester admitted that while researching Asian hate, they found that it is mostly black men attacking them — so they did not dig in deeper.

The next wave of leftist propaganda is hitting America's shores.  On Tuesday [4/13/2021], Project Veritas released a video showing a CNN technical director named Charlie Chester who cheerfully spilled the beans: under the leadership of Jeffrey Zucker, CNN is a pure Democrat propaganda outfit that worked hard to get Trump out of the White House.  With that mission accomplished, it's going to change its propaganda to pushing climate change because "fear sells."  Also on Tuesday, CNS News reported that numerous news sites have promised that, henceforth, they'll be calling climate change a "climate emergency."  In the Project Veritas video, CNN technical director Charlie Chester explained with great specificity how CNN played the game.  CNN's game isn't reporting the news in an unbiased fashion to help educate people.  Instead, its job is to support Democrats.  "Look, what we did, we [CNN] got Trump out."  When it came to anything Trump, the point was to paint a negative picture.

NR tries and fails to take down James O'Keefe.  National Review today once again tried to take down an actual conservative.  Once again it failed.  Dan McLaughlin got in a Twitter spat with James O'Keefe of Project Veritas.  To promote his latest expose, O'Keefe tweeted a video clip and wrote, "CNN Technical Director Charlie Chester: 'Look what we did, we [@CNN] got Trump out.  I am 100% going to say it, and I 100% believe that if it wasn't for CNN, I don't know that Trump would have got voted out... I came to CNN because I wanted to be a part of that.'"  That is [...] pretty good work.  Every conservative journalist is proud of O'Keefe's work.  Naturally, National Review is upset.  Enter McLaughlin who tweeted, "If true, damning of CNN.  But unfortunately, it's hard for anyone to bet their credibility on believing that a Project Veritas video will withstand close scrutiny."  If true?  O'Keefe has the man on videotape saying the things he quoted him as saying.  Who are you going to believe, National Review or your own eyes?

A CNN employee continues to give away devastating trade secrets.  As is always the case with Project Veritas, it doesn't stop with one video.  Instead, day after day, there's a steady drip, drip, drip of incriminating videos about Project Veritas's target — in this case, CNN.  Two days ago, we learned that CNN boss Jeff Zucker instructed employees to do everything they could, including lying, to ensure Trump's loss and Biden's win.  On Thursday, the latest video revealed that you weren't imagining it when you suspected CNN of deliberately slanting its racial coverage to protect Blacks and Black Lives Matter.  There's an interesting change of tone in Thursday's video.  In the video released on Tuesday, CNN Technical Director Charlie Chester was boastfully triumphant as he explained how CNN deliberately set about to undermine Trump and bolster Biden.  He was proud of the "propaganda" that pushed Jeff Zucker's (and, presumably, all of the CNN employees') partisan agenda.  In the latest video, about CNN's deliberate effort to hide a malefactor's race if he or she is Black, Chester seems sad and confused.

CNN Director Admits Network Weaponized COVID Death Toll — Project Veritas Report.  The mainstream media loves a high human death toll.  Take it from CNN Technical Director Charlie Chester, who was reportedly catfished through a dating site, according to Mediaite, and led to unwittingly disclose to the world that leftist CNN's dark reporting tactics through the last year were allegedly rooted in a desire to see more dead mothers, fathers, daughters, sons and grandparents.  Video shared by Project Veritas on Tuesday [4/13/2021] purported to show Chester admitting his employer engages in pushing "propaganda" in order to achieve its political ends.  Conservative journalist James O'Keefe shared undercover video Tuesday he said was of Chester bragging about CNN's 2020 mission:  to oust former President Donald Trump.  The video is compelling.  [Video clip]

Watch: CNN Staffer Goes on Five Tinder Dates With Project Veritas Spy Recording the Whole Thing.  James O'Keefe's Project Veritas has just released new, secretly recorded footage on Tuesday that reveals CNN employees describing how the network worked to support President Joe Biden's campaign during the 2020 presidential election.  Mediaite has learned that this is the first in a series.  CNN Technical Director Charlie Chester played the video's starring role.  "Our focus was to get Trump out of office, right?" the video shows Chester telling someone off-camera.  "Without saying it, that's what it was."  As is the case with videos made from source material captured from hidden cameras, one should approach the final product with a healthy dose of caution.  Post-production editing is a dark art that can materially change the meaning and context of many things that seem obvious at first blush. [...] But in this instance, there are enough examples of full and complete comments made by Chester that were clearly not crafted out of thin air, or misleading editing tricks.

CNN Director Admits Network Pumps 'Propaganda' And 'Speculation' — "Our Focus Was To Get Trump Out Of Office".  Project Veritas has released a stunning new undercover video of CNN Technical Director Charlie Chester admitting his network fueled speculative propaganda against President Trump in order to remove him from office.  In the clip below, Chester admits the network will soon shift to fear-mongering over climate change.  "Fear sells," he gloats.  "No one ever says those things out loud, but it's obvious."  Earlier this week The National Pulse exposed CNN's Gabby Orr after she promoted a demonstrably false story concerning President Trump and Congressman Matt Gaetz.  [Video clip]

CNN Director Admits Network Airs Political Propaganda, Outlines Network Efforts to Remove President Trump and Boost Joe Biden.  Project Veritas and James O'Keefe strike again with undercover video of CNN executives admitting their goal was to boost Joe Biden and eliminate President Trump in the 2020 election.  Additionally CNN Technical Director Charlie Chester admits the network is engaged in propaganda to advance the COVID narrative.  Quite a remarkable bit of undercover expose' by Project Veritas.  [Video clip]

Project Veritas caught a CNN director telling the partisan truth.  Every conservative who's ever watched CNN has known with certainty that the media outlet is acting as a propaganda arm of the Democrat party.  However, when we point that out, we get gaslighted.  We're told that we're paranoid, that we can't distinguish facts from our delusions, and that we're sore losers.  That's why conservatives reveled in Tuesday's Project Veritas video drop because it vindicated them completely.  Charlie Chester, CNN technical director, openly revels in the network's "propaganda" to "get Trump out of office."  Sadly, when CNN talks, people still listen.  The mere fact that Joe Biden is in the White House, despite a storied career of lies, plagiarism, vulgarity, viciousness, creepiness, and continuously bad foreign policy decisions, tells you that the people who voted for him (and there were real, legal voters who did vote for him) were on the receiving end of some heavy-duty indoctrination.  Thanks to Project Veritas's efforts, we finally have confirmation that CNN deliberately engaged in this indoctrination.  Here are just a few statements from Chester that will give you a feel for the video, even if you can't or don't want to watch it" [...]

Gaetz Turns it Around on CNN Journo After Network Exec Says Their Coverage of Him is "Propaganda".  CNN has breathlessly covered purported allegations of sexual misconduct against Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) and the FBI investigation into said purported allegations, and now, thanks to Project Veritas, we know that a great deal of that coverage is driven by a desire to destroy Gaetz.  CNN Technical Director Charlie Chester said the network is "going to keep running those stories to keep hurting him," because "He's a problem for the Democratic Party because he's so conservative."  As my colleague Bonchie covered, Chester said that CNN's "focus" in the 2020 election "was to get Trump out of office" and that Chester and his colleagues were "more than keen to take credit for putting Joe Biden in the White House."  Chester even went so far as to add a bullet point to his now-deleted LinkedIn account claiming he "played an integral part in the 2020 Presidential elections."

Watch: Leaked Video Shows CNN Director Admits Matt Gaetz Stories Are Democrat Propaganda.  Newly uncovered hidden camera footage reveals CNN's technical director admitting that stories surrounding Rep. Matt Gaetz are "propaganda" aimed at aiding the Democratic Party.  In a stunning admission, Charlie Chester admits, "If the agenda say, is to like get, like Matt Gaetz right now, he's like this Republican.  He's a problem for the Democratic Party because he's so conservative and he can cause a lot of hiccups in passing of laws and what not.  So it would be great for the Democratic Party to get him out."

How CNN Faked a Story about Matt Gaetz, Got Caught, But Still Won't Remove It.  In the early afternoon of April 11th, 2021, internal and external communications staffers for embattled Congressman Matt Gaetz (FL-1) received a request for comment from newly minted CNN reporter Gabby Orr.  Orr, a former POLITICO employee, would report as her first story for Jeff Zucker's network that Rep. Gaetz had been denied a meeting with former President Trump.  The aim of the story was to weaken support for Gaetz on Capitol Hill as the House returns from recess.  Orr's e-mail read:  "Apologies for bothering you on a Sunday but I wanted to run something by you for confirmation before reporting it out... I was told by two people familiar that Congressman Matt Gaetz asked to meet with former President Trump at [Mar-A-Lago] last week and was denied."  But Orr did, in fact, "report it out" before receiving any confirmation from either side.  And the original CNN story claimed neither side has responded, which wasn't true.

CNN Claims Biden's Policies May Prove 'Popular' With Republicans.  According to certain commentators on CNN, President Joe Biden's policies are actually "popular" among Republican voters.  During a segment Wednesday night [4/7/2021], Don Lemon hosted a panel wherein they discussed Biden's current initiatives on gun control and infrastructure, suggesting that his focus on getting things done will prove popular with Republicans.

The Higher Superstition:  The fallacy that lies behind "follow the science" fundamentalism.  More and more frequently we so-called advanced moderns believe things to be true that an illiterate farmer in 1800 would have known to be false.  As every year passes, the self-proclaimed progressive "brights" — those who "follow the science" rigorously, they claim, when making and supporting public policies — endorse as proven facts beliefs and policies that are driven by ideological or venal self-interest rather than truth.  If they continue, the consequences will be the bankruptcy of our culture, economy, and political freedom.  Take this statement from CNN, a loud champion of "science":  "It is not possible to know a person's 'gender identity' at birth, and there is no consensus criteria for assigning sex at birth."  Such a statement back in 1800 would have been dismissed as the ravings of a crank or the sales-pitch for some patent snake-oil.

CNN News Article Says 'No Consensus Criteria for Assigning Sex at Birth'.  A Tuesday [3/30/2021] CNN news story stated as fact that "there is no consensus criteria for assigning sex at birth" without attribution.  The CNN story, written by breaking news reporter Devan Cole, was about Republican South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem's battle with state lawmakers over HB 1217, a bill that seeks to ban biological males from women's sports.  "?It's not possible to know a person's gender identity at birth, and there is no consensus criteria for assigning sex at birth," Cole wrote, without attribution.

Pro tip from CNN: "Not possible" to know a baby's "gender identity" at birth.  Can we tell a baby's gender at birth?  After untold millennia of human experience — and the emergence of "gender reveal party" industry to the contrary — CNN's news section informs us that we should believe them rather than our own lying eyes.  In a report on South Dakota governor Kristi Noem's executive order barring transgendered biological males from competing in women's sports, Devan Cole insists that telling "gender identity" is impossible at birth.

CNN's "COVID War" Special Was a Scripted Fauci and Birx Reality Show.  The dynamic duo of Drs.  Anthony Fauci and Deborah Birx spent nine months of 2020 (February-October) appearing to be the adults in the room who had to deal with, as the legacy media loved to frame it, an ever petulant, ill-informed, and dangerous President Donald J. Trump.  In CNN's 'COVID War' Special on Sunday [3/28/2021], I surmise that all doubt was removed on who the adults were, and it certainly was not these doctors.  The wholesale campaign to throw the president, and others, under the bus on the COVID policy that they helped to create, then taking credit for the COVID breakthroughs that they had little to do with, is reminiscent of children jockeying for position to benefit themselves.

Former CNN contributor slams network for having a 'thumb' on the scale.  While it doesn't take a rational viewer long to determine that CNN is a network heavily biased to the left, it's not so much that they are prejudiced against the right as much as it is their arrogance in billing themselves as a "trusted" news source.  The term "Fake News CNN" became popular under former President Donald Trump, who frequently called the network out for its reporting, and never has their credibility been as wavering as it did once CNN President Jeff Zucker embarked on a Trump-hating agenda.  A four year campaign of all but dedicating 24/7 coverage to tarnishing the former president — a campaign that paid dividends in November 2020.  And it doesn't help matters when one of CNN's former contributors comes forward to flat out accuse them of having their thumb on the scale.

The 'Pathetic' Genesis of a Fake News Story.  In a headline clearly designed to prompt outrage, CNN recently claimed that "Sidney Powell argues in new court filing that no reasonable people would believe her election fraud claims."  Similarly, CBS News asserted that "Sidney Powell tells court 'no reasonable person' would take her voter fraud claims as fact."  The implication is that Powell, one of the most prominent critics of the 2020 presidential election, who has been outspoken in her claims that Joe Biden's victory was secured through outright fraud involving, in particular, illegal and malicious manipulation of the vote-counting machines, has now repudiated those claims. [...] Powell has not, in any way, retreated from her claims.  In spite of the assurances to the contrary from Democrats and the mainstream media, uncertainties remain about the integrity of Biden's election as president.  Prominent among these is the operation of the software and hardware provided by the "election infrastructure company Dominion Voting Systems," which has sued Powell for defamation for her public assertions that Dominion's machines were used as instruments of fraud.

CNN Went to Great Lengths to Avoid Calling Tragic DC Uber Eats Story What It Is.  So, is CNN allergic to the truth?  Oh right — you already know that they are.  This isn't a Trump-related news story, however.  It's a local crime story from Washington, D.C., but it became a national story, or at least it should, because of how the network framed the tragic story.  An Uber driver was assaulted and killed by two teenagers, and CNN decided to frame the incident as an "accident."  I'm not kidding.  It was a carjacking attempt gone wrong.

Leftwing Propaganda Organs Begin Dying Post-Trump — Especially CNN.  This could be the greatest gift Trump has given us.  So far.

Fake News?  Progressive publication thinks CNN migrant crossing video was staged.  Is CNN back in the business of fake news?  Is fake news the addiction it just can't quit?  It is, if a progressive magazine, American Prospect, has it right about a staged border crossing, and based on their report, they made a very good argument. [...] Still another issue was the orderliness of the migrants, who stood in single file line awaiting their turn.  Not even open-borders advocates claimed that that was normal migrant behavior, illegal migrants don't wait their turn in line.  There was also the nature of migrant smugglers — would they really stand by as a camera crew filmed them instead of pull out their guns as criminals do?  Seems implausible.  Human smugglers are an arm of Mexico's cartels.  Fakest of all would be CNN's claim that it just 'happened' upon this smuggling operation by chance.  Who the heck believes that?

CNN's correction to the imploded Trump/Georgia story leaves something to be desired.  The Washington Post has issued a major correction to a story that caught fire with Dems and the media (pardon the redundancy) back in January.  This is the Post's correction:  [Tweet]  At the time, other media outlets, including CNN, jumped all over the story because it fit their desired narrative perfectly.  CNN's tweet from January 9th remains:  [Tweet]  CNN has gotten around to issuing a correction, albeit a much smaller one than the WaPo.  You'll notice they claim Trump was being paraphrased while the story had quote marks around what Trump supposedly said:  [Tweet]

CNN's war on Fox News goes nuclear — with a twist.  CNN's on again-on again war (that's not a typo — it never ends) against Fox News is getting hotter, most likely because CNN is once again seriously trailing Fox News in the ratings.  Brian Stelter, his network's leading attack dog, was at it again yesterday [3/14/2021] on his weekly program CNN Reliable (sic) Sources.  The program led with a full-frontal attack on Fox News's most highly rated show, Tucker Carlson Tonight, and its host, veteran reporter, editor, and television talk show host Tucker Carlson. [...] You have to hand it to Tucker Carlson.  Such an attack provides more proof — as if any is needed — that he is right over the target of the insane left wing's lies and hypocrisy that get more outrageous every day.

Prelude to a Kiss?  State Dept. to 'intensify' inquiry into Cuban sonic attacks.  Anyone with half a brain — maybe even much less than that — can easily discern the handiwork of Castro, Inc. in the neurological injuries sustained by American and Canadian diplomats in Castrogonia.  Yet, most media outlets keep treating this news story as some kind of impenetrable mystery.  Here is the latest installment from the Castro News Network (CNN), which prefers to refer to the injuries as "Havana Syndrome", a term invented by Canadians in order to absolve Castro, Inc. of all responsibility by implying that mass hysteria of some sort is involved.  The article predictably quotes Bernie Sanders' senatorial colleague and fellow Castrophilliac Jeanne Shaheen, who blames Trump for botching the investigation and silently implies that he did so on purpose so he could punish Castro, Inc. unfairly.  Anyway, it looks as if Jar-Jar Biden has now greased the skids for a quick and easy absolution of Castro, Inc.  Naturally, this move is being disguised as an honest "inquiry."

Guess How CNN Is Describing the Crisis at the Southern Border.  Democrats and their cohorts in the media chided President Donald Trump over immigration policies that resulted in holding "kids in cages" and "separating families" at the United States-Mexico border, a claim that lacked nuance.  It was something the left repeatedly hammered as inhumane and wrong.  But now, roughly six weeks into his administration, President Joe Biden is continuing with a policy that was first established under President Barack Obama.  Biden's holding unaccompanied minors in the administration's "first migrant child facility" — you know, the type of facility that was labeled as "kids in cages" when Trump was in office?  CNN, however, decided to cover the "first migrant child facility" in a way that downplays the severity at the border.  Instead of referring to them as "kids in cages," like they have in the past, the network took a more subtle approach.

Media Bias?  What Media Bias?  How is Chris Cuomo still on the air at CNN?  Chris Cuomo has realized that he's related to the Governor of New York State. [...] Now that there are questions about sexual misconduct, and coverups of the death toll from his nursing home policies, Brother Chris wants to bow out.  Right.

'Thank God for Andrew Cuomo': A Timeline Of CNN's Adoring Coverage Of Andrew Cuomo.  In pursuit of their "higher objective" of unseating former President Donald Trump, the Leftist legacy media vocally rallied behind New York Governor Andrew Cuomo in 2020, presenting him as the hero of the pandemic, as the supposed ultimate example of leadership when compared to President Trump.  Now that he no longer serves an obvious purpose with a Democrat in the White House, the tide has suddenly turned, with the adoring coverage dying down amid a growing number of sexual assault and harassment allegations — all while the COVID cover-up which contributed to the death of thousands of elderly New Yorkers continues to hang over his administration.

CNN's Finger-pointing on 'Misinformation' Should Be Done in a Mirror.  Brian Stelter and Oliver Darcy, CNN's in-house cheerleaders for censoring or squelching conservative media outlets, celebrated a letter in which Democrats on the House Energy and Commerce Committee pressed TV providers to punish right-wing spreaders of so-called misinformation.  Reps.  Anna Eshoo and Jerry McNerney, both California Democrats, asked, "What moral or ethical principles (including those related to journalistic integrity, violence, medical information, and public health) do you apply in deciding which channels to carry or when to take adverse actions against a channel?"  CNN exudes arrogance about its own performance, never worrying that TV providers will question the quality of its information or its journalistic integrity.  One major provider is AT&T, which owns CNN.  Another is Comcast, which owns NBC, CNBC, and MSNBC.  So those providers dumping Fox or putting it in a more obscure channel tier would look like a crass commercial move, not some public-spirited stand.

The Thread That Shreds CNN's Fake News idiocy... and This Is Just the Tip of the Iceberg.  Remember when Fox News' Tucker Carlson ripped into the news media for spreading misinformation, specifically the drivel emanating from the offices of CNN?  Well, we have some receipts documenting CNN's long history of disseminating fake news idiocy.  Actually, it was done by Brent Bozell, the founder of the Media Research Center, which tracks liberal media bias.  Newsbusters doles out stories about the liberal media's bad behavior daily.  It's the point of the lance within this organization.  Since its inception, the MRC has recorded every major news broadcast since 1987.  It's now digitized, but whatever CNN has said that was pure applesauce, it will be recorded, filed, and found by this crew.

CNN Ripped For 'Bizarre Distortion' Of Clarence Thomas Dissent In PA Election Case.  CNN legal analyst Joan Biskupic was excoriated for a Monday article in which she claimed Justice Clarence Thomas sympathized with former President Donald Trump's allegations of election fraud in one of his dissents earlier this week.  "Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas on Monday claimed election fraud is a threat to America, revealing in a forceful dissent some support for former President Donald Trump and Republicans who have refused to accept the result of the 2020 election," Biskupic began in an article titled "Justice Clarence Thomas reveals some sympathy for Trump's baseless fraud claims."

Rebuttal to Fake News CNN's Hatchet Job.  The recent baseless CNN attack on us is a fake news media hit job of epic proportions which lacks all journalistic ethics and impartiality.  CNN's attack demonstrates that it is not just questioning of the alleged safety of vaccines but "free speech itself."  What is indisputable (but not mentioned in CNN's biased report) is that the COVID vaccines are being used under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the FDA.  An EUA makes the vaccine available for "public health emergencies," but also means that the FDA has not yet compiled all the evidence and clinical data that it would examine before fully approving a drug for public distribution and use.  When combined with the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Declaration of February 4, 2020 and the invocation of the PREP Act, the vaccine manufacturers are immune from legal liability (i.e., they cannot be sued for money damages in court) for losses relating to the administration or use of covered countermeasures (like vaccines) against COVID-19.  Despite over 500 reported deaths from the COVID vaccine (according to the CDC's VAERS database), the CNN report insinuates that vaccines are undeniably "safe" while totally ignoring the indisputable $4.4 Billion paid out to Americans damaged by previous vaccinations — an amount paid by the DHHS itself!

Brian Stelter Asks Politifact About Andrew Cuomo, and the Interview Was Everything Wrong With Journalism.  Fact-checkers and journalists alike have done major damage to their respective professions over the years — the last four years especially, and two of the most notable examples of such are Politifact and CNN's Brian Stelter.  On Sunday during his "Reliable Sources" program, Stelter had on his network's resident fact-checker and fellow Joe Biden apologist Daniel Dale as well as Politifact's editor-in-chief Angie Drobnic Holan to discuss fact-checking in the Biden era.  We've been told in the past by our intellectual betters like Dale about how Biden supposedly doesn't lie a lot.  So you'd think Stelter and his guests wouldn't have had much to say during the segment.  But they did, especially when Stelter asked Holan about Gov. Andrew Cuomo's nursing home scandal and the fallout from it.

Cruz Calls CNN 'Dem Propagandists' For Story About GOP Senators And Defense Team.  On Thursday night [2/11/2021], CNN ran a story about three Republican senators who met with former President Donald Trump's defense team "in the middle of an impeachment trial in which they will vote on whether to convict Trump and potentially bar him from holding public office again."  The news outlet called out Senators Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Ted Cruz of Texas and Mike Lee of Utah for reportedly "going into a room in the US Capitol that Trump's lawyers were using to prepare for their arguments."  One of Trump's lawyers, David Schoen, commented "that the senators were 'very friendly guys' who just wanted to make sure they were 'familiar with procedure' on the eve of their rebuttal to the House impeachment managers' presentation."  Schoen was asked whether or not it was "appropriate" to meet with senators while the trial is ongoing, to which he replied, "Oh yeah, I think that's the practice of impeachment."  He also added, "There's nothing about this thing that has any semblance of due process whatsoever."

CNN and the dangerous distortion of truth while New Yorkers died.  CNN was blasted as "an abject disgrace to both the journalism profession and America writ large" in the wake of an aide to New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo admitting the state withheld COVID-19 nursing home death data after months of glowing coverage from the disgraced network.  Gov. Cuomo's little brother, Chris, hosts "Cuomo Prime Time" on CNN, regularly providing a platform last year for the governor to appeal to viewers by conducting playful on-air conversations masquerading as interviews amid the nursing home scandal.

What we still don't know about the Capitol riot.  On Jan. 6, supporters of Donald Trump swarmed the Capitol building.  Some forced their way inside, and Washington has never been the same.  It may never be the same.  As a result of what happened on Jan. 6, your descendants will live in a very different country.  Some in Congress have compared that day to 9/11. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., has likened it to Pearl Harbor, which spurred America's entry into the Second World War.  Every day we hear new and more florid comparisons from Democratic partisans.  But Tuesay night, CNN outdid all of them by comparing what happened Jan. 6 to the Rwandan genocide.  Keep in mind that close to a million people were murdered in Rwanda in 1994, about 70% of all ethnic Tutsis in the country.  Entire towns were hacked to death with machetes.  People were set on fire and crushed alive by bulldozers.  Hundreds of thousands of women were raped.  It was among the most horrifying crimes in human history.

CNN's Cooper Compares Trump, Supporters to Hutus in Rwandan Genocide.  Tuesday night on CNN, AC360 host Anderson Cooper added to the Jeffrey Zucker-led network's resume of hate against those they disagree with as he compared former President Donald Trump and his supporters to those that carried out the Bosnian and Rwanda genocides in the 1990s.  And to underscore Cooper's seriousness, a NewsBusters search found that he also leveled these comparisons back on January 12.  To give you an idea of just how callous this comparison was, 8,000 men were slaughtered in July 1995 during the 1992-1995 Bosnian War that killed over 100,000 people.  Over in Rwanda, more 800,000 moderate Hutus and Tutsis were killed over three months in 1994 by the Hutu extremists.  Cooper was speaking Tuesday with Congressman Adam Kinzinger (R-IL) when he lamented that a feature of our political discourse has been "otherizing people" and make them "other than American, other than patriotic, other than — than human."

CNN Repeatedly Claimed Capitol Officer Sicknick Died Due To A Fire Extinguisher Hit.  Now They've Quietly Admitted That May Not Be True.  CNN quietly snuck out a report this week, without posting the story to their homepage and barely covering the news on air.  It suggests despite the multitude of claims since January 6th, Capitol police officer Brian Sicknick was NOT killed by a blunt force trauma.  Posted on Tuesday [2/2/2021], CNN's new story was not shared by any of their leading personalities, reporters, or anchors.

Brian Stelter Says CNN Is Not Trying To Eliminate Its Conservative Rivals, Only "Liars".  Like the Democratic party, CNN is using the unfortunate events that took place in the nation's capital during a rally for election integrity to eliminate their competition.  In the case of the Democrats, an increasingly unhinged Nancy Pelosi and her minions including Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have accused their Republican House colleagues of being an "enemy within" with growing calls for the expulsion of their opponents.  On a drastically more dangerous level, the so-called "storming" of the Capitol by Trump supporters along with Antifa provocateurs who were allowed into the building by police has served as the impetus for a terrifying new domestic terrorism law that some have described as the Patriot Act on steroids.

Don Lemon Launches Another Attack On Trump Supporters; "Living In Fantasyland".  Without question, CNN host Don Lemon is one of the most ineffective 'journalists' on television.  He's arrogant.  Smug.  Lacks self-awareness.  And he is so convinced that he's the only one with the facts on everything he is incapable of grasping reality.

CNN's Jim Acosta:  Trump supporters, Fox News remain 'a threat to our democracy'.  CNN chief domestic correspondent Jim Acosta said Sunday that conservative media like Fox News and the people who continue to support former President Donald Trump remain "a threat to our democracy."  During an appearance on "Reliable Sources," CNN anchor Brian Stelter said "the world seems a little quiet" after Mr. Trump was permanently banned from Twitter, and he asked Mr. Acosta whether he thought the quiet was temporary.  "I think it is temporary," Mr. Acosta responded.  "I mean, I do think what this country faces right now, and you know, I describe it as the disinformation industrial complex.  And that is Trump and his people, conservative outlets like Fox News, and then conservative websites and organizations aligned with the president and conservative platforms.

CNN chyron propaganda
CNN's Latest Chyron May Be Their Worst Yet, but It Gets Even Worse.  Brian Stelter's show is hardly known for hard hitting, unbiased journalism given who the host and its frequent guests are.  It's one of the most laughable pieces of television on the weekends, reaching levels partisanship that border on parody.  Yet, this latest chyron seems a bit excessive.  I mean, at least try to keep the mask on, right?


CNN Was In On It!  Reporter Disguised Herself As Trump Supporter And Plotted With BLM Member.  On Thursday night [1/14/2021], [...] new footage showed CNN's Jade Sacker inside of the Capitol with John Sullivan, the BLM member who was charged by federal prosecutors for inciting chaos on January 6th.  Sacker co-conspired with the liberal activist in order to cause chaos and make Trump supporters look bad.  The shocking video shows her and Sullivan celebrating and shouting "We did it!" when they got the footage they were looking for.  When she asked Sullivan if he was filming, he said was going to delete it.  He never did.

Painting with a broad brush:
Don Lemon Doubles Down; Says ALL Trump Supporters Are Complicit With The KKK.  CNN's Don Lemon isn't just the dumbest man on television, like President Trump has said, he's also one of the most dangerous.  While his gaslighting in the past has no doubt inspired left-wing kooks around the country to at least consider violence against conservatives and supporters of the president, his recent rhetoric is going to get someone killed one of these days — and when it happens, he needs to be held legally accountable for it.  During his nightly hand-off with another of the network's lunatics, Chris Cuomo, on Wednesday, Lemon proclaimed that anyone and everyone who voted for the president — that would be nearly 75 million Americans at last count — was a member of, or aligned with, the Ku Klux Klan, as well as responsible for the riot-nee-'insurrection' at the U.S. Capitol Building last week.

Cuomo, Lemon Argue Our Riots Were Cooler Than Yours and 'Justified'.  Politically motivated violence is wrong, disgusting, and not justifiable no matter the cause.  But not according to CNN's PrimeTime host Chris "Fredo" Cuomo and CNN Tonight host Don Lemon.  During the Tuesday handoff between their shows, the duo essentially argued that the Black Lives Matter and Antifa riots from last spring and summer were cooler than last week's Capitol Hill attack because they were "justified" and the cases were not "apples to apples." [...] Then, ignoring the fact that the leftist riots racked up over $1 billion in damages and destroyed many lives and livelihoods, Lemon vented.  "And listen, I'm glad you mentioned about being shot by cops because you cannot compare.  And I'm sick of people comparing.  You can't compare what happened this summer to what happened at the Capitol.  It's two different things," he whined.

CNN openly trying to ban Fox News, Newsmax, OAN from airwaves with Dem stamp of approval.  Fox News and other right-leaning outlets are being targeted by frenzied Democrats and liberal media calling for them to be deplatformed.  Democrats are using the mob riot at the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday [1/6/2021] to justify demands to pull the plug on what CNN's Brian Stelter called "dishonest companies that profit off of disinformation and conspiracy theories."  CNN's chief media correspondent made his argument in his newsletter as did Oliver Darcy and others who lack all self-awareness when it comes to pointing fingers.

The Great Purge Expands As CNN Sets Its Sights On Fox News' Cable Providers.  The 'never let a crisis go to waste' crew are busily turning Wednesday's Capitol riot into their very own Reichstag fire, using it as the premise by which to ban President Trump across social media and now, apparently, to go after cable companies for being complicit in "spreading disinformation" by giving Fox News a platform.  Lest you be (justifiably) confused by the meaning of "disinformation," remember that it does not include years of the media and Democrats lying about Russia, Russia, Russia, and it most certainly does not include wild-eyed claims that Trump is a Russian asset.  It also does not mean spreading fabulist nonsense about Trump's response to the Wuhan coronavirus, and it definitely doesn't mean constantly repeating proven falsehoods.  "Disinformation" means only one thing: anything that does not fit the Democrat narrative.  The narrative changes with some frequency, so yesterday's "fact," may well be today's "disinformation."

CNN mainstreams Kentucky election conspiracy theory.  At CNN, "facts first" is just a slogan.  Network contributor Lawrence Wilkerson this week suggested, without evidence, that "there was a little cheating" in the 2020 Kentucky Senate race when Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell soundly defeated Democratic challenger Amy McGrath.  CNN host Kate Bolduan, who made a minor splash this month when she appeared on-air wearing a $380 custom-made "facts first" sweater, did exactly nothing to challenge her guest's baseless suggestion.  Even more ironic is that Wilkerson's conspiracy theory mongering came as he alleged, falsely, that Republicans are "never" investigated for election fraud.  Did he manage to sleep through the entire Russia investigation?

Acting US defense secretary's chief of staff Kash Patel files $50M defamation lawsuit against CNN.  Kash Patel, the chief of staff to Acting Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller, has filed a $50 million defamation lawsuit against CNN and several of its top reporters, claiming the liberal network published false statements and promoted "unfounded left-wing political narratives" by painting Patel as a pro-Trump conspiracy theorist seeking to smear President-elect Joe Biden.  The complaint filed on Friday [12/11/2020] in Virginia Circuit Court named CNN reporters Barbara Starr, Zachary Cohen, Ryan Browne, Alex Marquardt and Nicole Gaouette as defendants, in addition to the network itself.  It claims CNN "deliberately or recklessly conveyed a false message" to sensationalize the "news" and humiliate Patel.

Project Veritas Exposes How CNN Reacted to the Hunter Biden Story.  Project Veritas's James O'Keefe secretly recorded CNN's morning conference calls for two months, and vowed to release raw audio every day until Christmas.  On Wednesday [12/2/2020], he exposed how CNN strategized after the New York Post's bombshell story on Hunter Biden's emails in the weeks leading up to the election.  While big tech companies censored the story, mainstream media outlets like CNN went along by simply ignoring it altogether.  "Obviously, we're not going with the New York Post story right now on Hunter Biden," CNN Political Director David Chalian advised during the Oct. 14 conference call, which is when the Post released its first story on Hunter's emails.  He later said the report was "giving its marching orders" to what the "rightwing echo chamber" should discuss that day.

CNN silent as nurse's viral tale of patients denying coronavirus from deathbeds falls apart.  CNN is silent after South Dakota emergency room nurse Jodi Doering claimed on the liberal network that patients dying from coronavirus often don't believe it despite her story appearing to have been a "massive exaggeration" if not worse.  CNN's interview went viral, with one clip piling up over 5.8 million views on Twitter.  NewsBusters conducted a study, indicating that CNN spent 23 minutes and 38 seconds on Doering's tale over a two-day period.  "Of course, CNN has yet to air an acknowledgment or correction because, when there's a narrative to push, CNN subscribes to the mantra of if it rings true, it is true," NewsBusters managing editor Curtis Houck wrote.

CNN Says Americans 'Unlikely' to See Higher Taxes Under Biden.  CNN is trying to hoodwink Americans into believing that their taxes won't increase under a Biden administration.  The network's latest article read like a press release by former Vice President Joe Biden's campaign staff:  "The vast majority of Americans are unlikely to see their taxes go up under President-elect Joe Biden, despite false claims by President Donald Trump to the contrary."  The article used the left-wing Tax Policy Center (TPC) as its source.  CNN Politics writer Katie Lobosco, in her piece headlined "Will your taxes go up under Biden?  It's unlikely," reiterated the false Biden campaign position that the tax plan "wouldn't raise individual taxes on anyone earning less than $400,000 a year, which is more than 90% of taxpayers."  That flies directly in the face of a rare fact check that ABC's Jonathan Karl did on that same Biden claim.

Tammy Bruce unloads on CNN journo comparing Trump's 4 yrs to Nazis warning Jews.  Fox News contributor and conservative pundit Tammy Bruce leveled CNN's Christiane Amanpour for becoming the latest left-wing journalist to compare President Donald Trump and his administration to Adolph Hitler and his murderous Nazi regime.  In an interview Friday [11/13/2020] with network host Sean Hannity, Bruce strongly reacted to a clip of Amanpour's Thursday evening broadcast in which she referenced "Kristallnacht," a 1938 event in which German Nazis attacked Jews and Jewish businesses over the course of two days.

Atlanta's Election Day Pipe Dream.  Election Day 2020 was unusual for several predictable reasons involving high in-person turnout and veritable avalanches of mail-in ballots.  One exceptionally odd event, however, took everyone by surprise — vote counting suddenly stopped for hours in several key swing states late Tuesday night.  One of these mysterious halts occurred in Fulton County, Georgia, where election officials insisted that a broken water pipe necessitated a four-hour delay before counting of absentee ballots could resume.  Yet evidence for what would have been quite a serious plumbing issue has been strangely elusive.  There doesn't appear to be any paperwork involving this leak.  Atlanta lawyer Paul Dzikowski, like many of us who vote in Georgia, was interested in the details of an incident serious enough to stop the vote-counting process for hours yet had been covered only in passing by the news media.  As he expressed it in one email to me, "I guess we shouldn't be surprised that News Corp. from Australia picked up this story from halfway around the world but CNN hasn't bothered ... even though CNN's headquarters are literally in the same building."

CNN Refuses to Run Ad Criticizing Biden.  You may not have even noticed it if you ever watch the Cable News Network (CNN), but over the last four years there has been a subtle, nigh-imperceptible shift in attitude toward President Donald John Trump (R).  Back in 2016, CNN cheered Trump's campaign.  They gave him countless hours of free airtime and were absolutely delighted when the GOP nominated him.  They couldn't believe their luck!  But then Trump... y'know... won.  So now they don't seem to like him quite as much.  If you watch carefully and read between the lines, it's almost as if they're insanely desperate to get him out of the White House.

CNN Misses Revenue Targets by $100+ Million.  The free market appears to be in agreement with a chant often heard at President Donald Trump's rallies:  CNN [is bad].  According to a new report from the Wall Street Journal, the Airport Network is having as much trouble as the airline industry as of late. [...] CNN has been among those suffering the worst from Trump Derangement Syndrome in the Trump-era, which has led to a number of notable blunders in their reporting.  [List of examples]  That's just to name a handful of examples — but with reporting like that, it's no question why CNN is having trouble hitting their revenue targets.

Ex-British ambassador to US probed over alleged relationship with CNN reporter.  The feds launched an "unprecedented" probe into Britain's former ambassador to the US because they feared he was leaking secret White House intel to his alleged lover — a CNN journalist, according to a sensational new report.  The Department of Justice investigation into Kim Darroch and his alleged relationship with CNN reporter Michelle Kosinski is thought to be the first into a serving British ambassador in Washington, The Sun reported.  "For the US to investigate the most senior diplomat of its greatest ally on suspicion of leaking secret information is almost unprecedented," a security source told the outlet.

Brian Stelter Hilariously Proves Trump's Point in Segment Explaining Why CNN Covers Him More Than Biden.  [Scroll down]  [T]he media's coverage of Trump isn't so lopsided in comparison to Biden because Trump is allegedly "shocking."  And Biden isn't "protecting his lead in the polls with a less-is-more approach."  Biden's lead is not being "protected" by Biden but instead by "news" networks like CNN who ignore shocking stories that are damaging to Biden's faux "decent guy" image by keeping the focus on Trump and off of Biden's flubs, gaffes, stumbles and negative news stories that have the potential to swing voters in Trump's direction.  Think about how CNN, for example, "covered" Tara Reade's sexual assault allegations against Biden.  It took them several WEEKS before they first reported on them, and even when they did they admitted that their reporting relied mostly on what the New York Times and the Washington Post had dug up about Reade.  Even now, several months later, CNN is still not covering Biden like they should be.  Instead, they cover for Biden, as has been evidenced by how they've treated the NY Post's explosive story on Hunter Biden's emails as fake news.

CNN Outrageously Gaslights on Court-Packing Issue, but Facts Simply Aren't on Their Side.  On Monday, during CNN's "Newsroom" program, one of their reporters morphed into a Joe Biden campaign spokeswoman on live TV, filing a "report" that sounded more like campaign talking points than actual reporting.  During the segment, CNN correspondent Abby Phillip made a rather astonishing claim when asked by co-host Poppy Harlow as to why Joe Biden continued to refuse to answer questions about whether or not he would consider packing the Supreme Court if elected president.  Phillip's answer was to suggest that it was President Trump and other Republicans who put "random ideas" out there like court-packing in an effort to paint Biden into a corner.

Fredo Cuomo:  Trump Didn't Win Peace Prize Because He Encouraged Terrorism.  CNN's Chris Cuomo concluded Friday's [10/9/2020] Prime Time by mocking President Trump for not winning the Nobel Peace Prize because, according to his logic, Trump has spent his presidency encouraging domestic terrorism (and therefore lobbying for Joe Biden and the Democrats to win in November).  Specifically, Cuomo sardonically suggested In a factually-challenged and deranged segment that one reason Trump didn't win after having encouraged the foiled kidnapping plot against Governor Gretchen Whitmer (D-MI).  Cuomo began by taking a shot at Trump and Fox, "Here's something you're not hearing on Fox.  Trump didn't win the Nobel Peace Prize today.  Wonder why?  Maybe it was failing to call out domestic terror, like the 13 suspects who may have been acting on his insurrection calls to liberate Michigan."  As the facts would show, the accused ringleader attended a June Black Lives Matter protest after having been, in the words of The Washington Post, "upset about the killing of George Floyd and police violence."  In other words, not exactly a Trump supporter.

The Full Crowley.  [Scroll down]  In the debate's aftermath, Obama supporters crowed; Romney sulked that Crowley had hijacked the debate.  And Crowley was never asked to moderate anything important again.  CNN offered various defenses.  But, in fact, Crowley's career more or less ended that night and two years later she went into retirement, her finale forever a reminder of what not to do as a debate moderator and an example of media bias.

Ric Grenell Tears Into CNN's Jake Tapper for Allowing Jill Biden to Shut Down Question on Biden's Gaffes.  That CNN treats the Biden campaign with kid gloves by routinely "asking" biased questions to senior spokespeople, advisors, and Biden himself is not a new development.  But watching them allow the terms of an interview to be dictated to them as cameras roll for all to see is something else entirely.  On Sunday [9/27/2020], "State of the Union" host Jake Tapper interviewed the Democratic presidential nominee's wife Jill Biden.  As expected, softball after softball was thrown, with Tapper at times coming off as a campaign spokesman himself. [...] Though it's been said many times before, it needs to be said again:  CNN is not a news network.  They just aren't.

CNN now has Amy Coney Barrett to resent and condescend to.  CNN headline writers can sneer like nobody's business.  Amy Coney Barrett's nomination to the Supreme Court gave that network and its progressive allies another opportunity kindle the fires of resentment and condescension while pretending to neutrality.  Somebody asked for an opinion roundup, so the "Baracksters" put the ball in play by damning with faint praise:  "Amy Coney Barrett a perfect choice for half of America" set the tone they were striving for. [...] Insinuation has a more exalted place in the CNN style guide than logic does, because (as the New York Times has been demonstrating even longer than CNN) insinuation can advance preferred narratives.  CNN would rather you didn't ask if the late Justice Ginsburg was perfect for (only) half of America, why her go-to move on the Court was writing dissenting opinions, or why Supreme Court nominations became so contentious in the first place (best to call Roe v. Wade [and] its companion case, Doe v. Bolton, "settled law" and not look too closely at them).

CNN Cuts Away as Protesters Drown Out Supreme Court Reporter With "CNN Is Fake News" Chants.  A live CNN report on the nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court was cut short by anchor Wolf Blitzer after hecklers drowned out reporter Ariane de Vogue with chants of "CNN is fake news!" as she reported from the Supreme Court.  Video posted to Twitter by Seattle talk radio host Jason Rantz shows a crowd of flag waving Trump supporters standing a ways back behind de Vogue start to loudly chant "CNN is fake news!" and also boo CNN until Blitzer tells de Vogue, "we can barely hear what you're saying."

The 'Mostly Peaceful' Lie Gets A Thorough, Well-Earned Debunking.  Just this month, as a CNN reporter stood in front of a burning car in riot-torn Kenosha, Wisconsin, the network's chyron at the bottom of the screen said "Fiery but mostly peaceful protests after police shooting."  Sorry, they were not "mostly peaceful," or any of the other false euphemisms used to describe the violent anarchy erupting in cities across the country.  Clearly, this is another case of journalists caught in a lie by their very own video images.  Many other instances of such journalistic gaslighting have emerged in recent months.

CNN Defends Not Fact-Checking Joe Biden, It's Alternate Reality Material.  Last night, Joe Biden took the stage for a "town hall" with CNN.  I put the description in scare quotes because it was anything but an honest event with normal citizens.  Meanwhile, not once throughout the night did CNN "fact-check" Biden's many lies, misstatements, and outright ridiculousness (for example, at one point, Biden claimed Trump could have saved every person who died of COVID).  The liberal network was ready with their excuse, though.  Brian Stelter's pet, Oliver Darcy, ran cover via his newsletter in what can only be called pure propaganda on his part. [...] It needs to be pointed out and documented that Biden has an incredibly long history of lying as a public figure.  That's not even debatable and for CNN to pretend otherwise is deeply dishonest.  Let's recall that Biden was made famous for plagiarism, a scandal he got caught up in while running for President the first time around.  He lied about his qualifications and copied others' work.  Today, it'd be brushed off because he's a Democrat, but at the time, it was treated as the low-life move it was.  Let's not forget his smearing of Judge Robert Bork either, which contained numerous misstatements.  Biden even lied about the circumstances of his late wife's car accident, trying to blame a man who was not responsible for what happened.  As Vice President, Biden lied about the Iran deal, he lied about Benghazi, and he lied about Obamacare.

Alan Dershowitz files $300 million defamation suit against CNN.  Famed attorney and Harvard Law School Professor Emeritus Alan Dershowitz filed a defamation suit against CNN on Tuesday seeking $300 million for what he called a "willful, deliberate, malicious effort to destroy my credibility."  Dershowitz told Fox News that CNN selectively edited a clip of his remarks from the Senate floor during President Trump's impeachment trial where he broke down the illegalities surrounding a "quid pro quo" as a member of the president's defense team.

CNN Erases 'Bay Of Pigs' Award To Accuse Trump Of Making It Up.  CNN tried to fact-check President Donald Trump's weekend claim that he received the "Bay of Pigs" award Sunday by reporting that no such award exists.  "For those confused by Trump's claim he got the 'highly honored Bay of Pigs Award':  He got an endorsement in 2016 from the Bay of Pigs Veterans Association.  It's not an award," explained network fact-checker Daniel Dale. [...] The Trump campaign almost immediately corrected Dale by publishing a photo of the president accepting the award.

CNN's Jake Tapper Ends Interview After WH Official Blasts Network For Not Being 'Honest'.  CNN host Jake Tapper abruptly ended an interview on Sunday with White House Trade Adviser Peter Navarro after Navarro blasted CNN for not being "honest with the American people."  The interview on CNN's "State of the Union" lasted several minutes before "things escalated quickly" and "the exchange was abruptly shut down after the conversation devolved into a political fight," Fox News reported.  Tapper accused the Trump administration and Navarro, in response, "flipped the script and accused CNN of lying to the American people, which led Tapper to end the interview."

CNN's Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Week.  CNN's troubles started on Tuesday, when Fox News host Tucker Carlson played a tape exposing CNN President Jeff Zucker appearing to offer a quid pro quo to then-candidate Donald Trump in 2016, the New York Post reported.  Zucker told Trump lawyer Michael Cohen that he wanted Trump, whom he called "the boss," to host a weekly show.  He also touted the importance of having CNN on Trump's side in the presidential election. [...] Zucker had worked with Trump as the former CEO of NBC Universal while the network was airing The Apprentice.  "You cannot be elected president of the United States without CNN," the network's president told Cohen.

CNN's Cillizza:  Trump Labeling 'Protests' as 'Riots' a Sign of Desperation.  CNN's Chris Cillizza might have outdone himself over the past weekend.  Although he has long had a reputation for extreme silliness, his analysis about President Donald Trump identifying what are obviously riots as "riots" rather than "protests" are a sign of "desperation," according to Cillizza.  What made Cillizza's observation particularly absurd was that the picture at the top of his weekend article (which was updated early Monday morning) showed a large burning building with a couple of armed law enforcement officers in riot gear in the foreground.  However, the true icing on the cake of Cillizza's silliness is that he not only tweeted his laughable observation but actually included that same picture from the article that completely undercut himself as you can see below.  As a result, Cillizza set himself up for the Mother of All Mockery on Twitter.

'You're nothing but a stooge': C-SPAN callers go all in on Brian Stelter and trash CNN as 'the enemy of the truth'.  One of CNN's top political commentators sat through a string of frustrated C-SPAN callers during a Tuesday morning [9/1/2020] segment on the network.  Appearing on C-SPAN's Washington Journal, two separate callers criticized Brian Stelter, decrying his anti-Trump obsession and accusing his home network of obfuscating the news cycle.  One caller from Minnesota said Stelter's new book, Hoax, is propaganda that would be used to divide the nation during unprecedented levels of tension across the political aisle.  "I don't know if there's any journalists left at CNN, but I know that if I were to estimate about 300 different distortions or misinformation that we get out of CNN ... if you added all that up to 46 months, it comes out to be 300,000-plus distortions of truth," the caller said.

The Democrat Party's Riots.  CNN anchors Chris Cuomo and Don Lemon have the collective brain capacity of rising third graders.  OK, fair point — there's no reason for me to insult our children like that.  But the one upside of the tumbleweeds blowing through their minds is that sometimes what the Left is really thinking accidentally rolls out of their mouths.  Don Lemon recently called on Joe Biden to make a speech addressing the riots and explaining how when it comes to reforming the police, he and Kamala Harris "will take care of this problem" after being elected.  "But guess what: the rioting has to stop."  Lemon then revealed the problem:  "Chris, as you know, and I know, it's showing up in the polling, it's showing up in focus groups.  It is the only thing — it is the only thing right now that is sticking."  Think about what he's really saying here.  "Rioting is fine — but only if it helps us win."

The Democrats' Laughable 'President Chaos' Strategy.  CNN's Don Lemon, one of the dumbest and [most eristic] Trump-haters, blurted out that as the polls were moving unfavorably, it might be wise for Democratic candidate Joe Biden to criticize mob violence, something he and his partisans had conspicuously failed to do at their convention the week before.  He did this within a day of his colleague Brian Stelter, who will enter the Guinness Book of World Records for the frequency of his utterance in reference to President Trump in the last three years, "The walls are closing in," righteously wagging his glabrous head at the viewers as he told them that the urban guerrilla violence sweeping the country really was "peaceful protest."  The same assurance was given by correspondents of CNN and the other anti-Trump networks reporting from riot-torn cities, even as largely minority-owned businesses torched by the "peaceful protesters" belched flame and smoke behind them.

To Refute Trump, Jacob Blake's Father Denies Family Has Pastor Days After Family Pastor Speaks At Press Conference.  The father of a 29-year-old domestic violence suspect resisting arrest before a Wisconsin police shooting claimed on CNN Monday [8/31/2020] the family has no pastor to refute claims by President Donald Trump that Trump spoke with such a minister.  "We don't have a family pastor," Jacob Blake Sr. told CNN's Jim Acosta when asked why the president claimed to have been in contact with the pastor and not the family directly. [...] If the family has no pastor, the identity of one individual at a Blake press conference last week remains a mystery.

New Low for CNN: Network Pits Family of Slain Retired Officer David Dorn Against One Another.  As you know, CNN is garbage.  Just when you think the network can't go any lower, CNN decides to bring on the family of David Dorn — the retired African American police officer who was killed at a left-wing riot back in June — to conduct a Jerry Springer style interview where family members fight over whether or not their slain relative would have supported President Trump's re-election.  Dorn's wife, Ann, gave a heart-wrenching address at the RNC convention, imploring Americans to end the bloodshed and cast their ballots for President Trump.  CNN didn't even care enough about David Dorn to report his death, which happened at one of those "mostly peaceful" rallies in St. Louis where a "peaceful protester" — AKA a looter with a gun — shot and killed David Dorn in cold blood.  CNN only decided that Dorn's death was worth reporting when Dorn's widow Ann decided to speak before the RNC convention.

CNN: There's very little rioting, very little violence.  CNN continues to live in an alternative reality where down is up and up is down.  Evidence emerges that Jacob Blake violated a restraining order by entering his ex-girlfriend's home last Sunday and has an outstanding warrant for sexual abuse.  So what does CNN do?  They publish a profile of Blake that paints him as a gentle, caring soul and devoted father.  It's entirely possible, I suppose, that both are accurate, but CNN conveniently omits the details that run counter to its far-left narrative.  Ditto for its handling of the mayhem that continues to grip several of America's Democrat-run cities.  CNN would of course ask "What mayhem?" Here's network contributor Kirsten Powers reciting the party line last Friday.  [Video clip]

CNN reporter tries to debunk black Trump support with wild claim Trump's sending message to 'white America'.  CNN and one of its reporters were slammed for attacking President Trump as a "racial flame-thrower" and analyzing his "appeal to white voters."  During a discussion following Wednesday's [8/26/2020] Republican National Convention, CNN host Anderson Cooper spoke with a panel of guests which included political reporter Nia-Malika Henderson who presented a head-scratching argument about Trump's message to white voters that "you won't have to share that power in his America."  Henderson explained "exactly what happened" when the Missouri couple, Mark and Patricia McCloskey, had defended their St. Louis home from protesters [...] "They drew guns on people who were outside their home on a sidewalk because they were black.  I mean, that's exactly what happened in that instance," Henderson claimed of the McCloskeys.

CNN: The Worst TV Network Ever.  Very few people were watching when Don Lemon made news Tuesday night [8/25/2020], by revealing how deeply his network is embedded with the presidential campaign of Joe Biden.  Discussing the riots in Kenosha, Wisconsin, with fellow CNN anchor Chris Cuomo, Lemon expressed concern that mob violence would damage the Democrats' chances in November:  ["]The rioting has to stop.  Chris, as you know and I know, it's showing up in the polling.  It's showing up in focus groups.  It is the only thing — it is the only thing right now that is sticking.["]  Question:  How does Don Lemon know what people are telling Democratic Party pollsters in focus groups?  But asking a question like that is probably racist.  Anyone who doesn't support Biden is a racist, as is anyone who criticizes CNN.  Such simple-minded formulae are CNN's journalistic stock-in-trade nowadays.  Mocked four years ago as the "Clinton News Network," CNN has since then labored diligently to destroy whatever credibility they still had after Hillary's failed campaign.

Mostly peaceful arson
CNN Chyron On Kenosha: 'Fiery But Mostly Peaceful Protests After Police Shooting'.  A CNN chyron reporting on the riots exploding in Kenosha, Wisconsin, during the early hours of Tuesday morning [8/25/2020] appeared to have gone unnoticed.  "Fiery But Mostly Peaceful Protests After Police Shooting," the news network's television headline blared while its reporter, Omar Jimenez, stood in front of several burning cars.  The footage features Jiminez explaining to viewers that while the city burns to the ground behind him, the so-called protesters destroying the blue-collar midwestern town were being "mostly peaceful."


This Is CNN.  CNN reporter reports in front of a burning building in Kenosha with a chyron that reads "Fiery But Mostly Peaceful Protests After Police Shooting"

CNN'S Admission: Lemon, Cuomo Say They Don't 'Fact-Check' DNC Because Dems Don't Lie Like Trump.  CNN hosts Don Lemon and Chris Cuomo trashed the Republican National Convention Monday night; saying they don't "fact-check" the Democrats "because they don't lie like Donald Trump."  "Who are people going to believe?  We'll see who makes the better case.  You can fact-check it to death, we can fact-check it all night.  People say, 'Well you didn't fact-check the Democrats!' They are not lying the way Trump does!" said Cuomo.  "Nobody lies the way this man does, has, and will, that I've ever seen in politics.  So, he's lying to you!  These people are all his echo!" added the CNN anchor.  [Video clip]

CNN Cuts Off Trump Speech, John King Accuses President Of 'Wrong, Misleading, Or Outright Lies'.  CNN cut into President Donald Trump's speech Monday morning at the Republican National Convention in Charlotte to break down the president's comments.  Trump, a frequent critic of ballot harvesting and mail-in voting was speaking on the topic Monday [8/24/2020] when CNN anchor Anderson Cooper broke into the broadcast to accuse the president of going "negative" in the convention's "first moments."  "He started off falsely attacking mail-in voting," Cooper said.  "He's continuing to attack mail-in voting as his postmaster general testifies that the attacks are 'unhelpful.'  That's his own postmaster general.  He also criticized the media for airing the postmaster's hearing instead of his roll call."

Democrats and NeverTrump carpetbaggers lie about Trump's acceptance speech.  The Democrats and their fellow travelers in the NeverTrump Lincoln Project are terrified that, if Americans hear Trump without mediation, Americans will (a) like what they hear and (b) know that neither he nor his supporters are racist.  (And defamatory racism accusations, of course, are the biggest sticks with which they can beat conservatives.)  So it was that, when Trump appeared in North Carolina to give his acceptance speech upon receiving the Democrat nomination, CNN cut away from the speech because of alleged "outright lies."  Then, the hate-filled carpetbaggers in the Lincoln Project, a coalition made up of failed Republican campaign advisors, accused an audience member of calling Obama a "monkey" to Trump's laughing agreement.  These are the actions of ugly and desperate people.

CNN Reveals Their Excuse to Censor the RNC as Their Self-Awareness Hits Zero.  If you thought the media might relax a bit during the Republican National Convention and not show themselves to be total hacks, you thought wrong.  But let's be serious, no one actually expected anything less.  CNN laid out the groundwork this morning for how they will censor the RNC and keep their chosen narratives on track.  The plan was unsurprisingly stated by Brian Stelter on his low-rated Sunday show.  In his comments, he promised that CNN would cut in with "fact-checks" to counter things being said by Republicans. [...] The lack of self-awareness here is fairly breathtaking.  CNN spews misinformation all the time, but past their own behavior, is the assertion here that the DNC contained no misinformation that needed to be countered?  I ask because CNN did not cut into the Democrat event with "fact-checks" no matter how egregious the lies told go. [...] Yet, now that the American people might actually get a real counter narrative from the RNC, CNN wants change the rules.

Tucker Carlson, Greg Gutfeld Dismantle CNN After Claim That No News Orgs Exist To Tear Down Trump.  Fox News hosts Tucker Carlson and Greg Gutfeld slammed CNN on Monday after CNN media reporter Brian Stelter aired a segment over the weekend claiming that no news organizations existed to tear down President Donald Trump.  The segment came as Stelter aggressively defended presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden over the week, claiming without evidence that "entire media companies essentially exist to tear down Joe Biden."

The Mainstream Media Has Betrayed Its Constitutional Privilege.  I have had several conversations with people in the past few days who are completely unaware of just how bad things have gotten in Portland.  Many of these people do pay a fair amount of attention to the news, but they've still missed the Portland stuff.  Because it's not in the news.  It is perhaps the biggest news in the country, but it isn't being reported.  Portland doesn't fit the narrative.  In fact, it destroys the narrative.  Were we to believe the media, what's happening in Portland is merely some mild unrest being acted out by some restless kids.  What's actually happening is such a nightmare that the cops there want to quit their jobs and peace out.  The mainstream media in America is not just irresponsible, it is absolutely delusional at times.  Yesterday [8/9/2020] we witnessed one of the most remarkably out-of-touch moments in modern mainstream media history when CNN's Brian Stelter wondered aloud if any anti-Trump media existed on the left.  It was a truly stunning question, one that I believe Stelter genuinely doesn't know the answer to because he is so ideologically isolated.

Dr. Harvey Risch on War Room After CNN Hit Job.  Dr. Harvey Risch joins Steve Bannon, Raheem Kassam, and @JackMaxey1 on War Room: Pandemic right after his appearance on New Day with John Berman where the host attempted to "put words in his mouth."  [Video clip]

Lunatic Trump Nazi Conspiracy Theory Shows CNN Isn't News.  On Friday's [7/31/2020] New Day, CNN co-host Alisyn Camerota and guest host Jim Sciutto brought on former Democratic Governor Jennifer Granholm and Defending Democracy Together founder Bill Kristol to spout insane conspiracies about President Trump and the upcoming election.  Granholm even suggested that Trump would use a Reichstag Fire like machination to enable him to remain in office:  "What if Trump foments right-wing provocateurs and then sends out the military to put out the fire he created?" Granholm began the discussion with her unhinged rant against Trump:  [Video clip]

Stop Being Nice: A Rant You're Not Going to Like.  America, the land of the free and the home of the brave, isn't living up to its reputation as either of those things.  Social justice has infected everything and turned the United States into the shadow of its former self. [...] If you want to see how bad it's gotten, here's a perfect example from just this morning.  America's most tertiary network, CNN, told us that "individuals with a cervix" must get cervical cancer screenings starting at age 25.  We have a name for individuals with a cervix.  We call them "women."  Cringe News Network won't even say "woman" because the tantrum-throwing radicals on the left would digitally (and maybe even physically now) storm CNN en masse and punish them for daring to not be "inclusive" enough.  The social justice warriors, as we call them, think they're being heroes but in reality, they're just erasing women by attributing one of the few things they can do that mean absolutely can't to some guy named Todd who wears a dress and demands you call him "Sharon."  Todd can't have children because he's a man, but simply saying Todd is a man (a basic fact) sends the modern-day digital Gestapo to your digital door.

CNN Redefines Women As 'Individuals With A Cervix'.  CNN redefined women as "individuals with a cervix" in a tweet reporting on updated recommendations for cervical cancer screenings from the American Cancer Society Friday [7/31/2020].  "Individuals with a cervix are now recommended to start cervical cancers screening at 25 and continue through age 65, with HPV testing every five years as the preferred method of testing, according to a new guidelines released by the American Cancer Society," CNN published.

Chris Cuomo Proves He's an Idiot, Ridiculously Dishonest, Or Both.  CNN's Chris Cuomo has had some banner moments when it comes to outright lying on his show.  After all, this is the same guy who staged a "resurrection" scene of him emerging from his basement, healed of the coronavirus.  In reality, he had been out several times, including traveling when he was supposed to be under quarantine.  CNN has yet to offer any real explanation for how that was presented.  But there's something different about choosing to stare into the camera to repeat a bald-faced lie while claiming to be an objective "journalist."  That's exactly what Cuomo did last night, and to be clear, I'm not talking about political spin.  That's to be expected.  I'm talking about actually lying about economic numbers that any random intern could have told him were wrong.

Another Year of Torrential Media Bias.  Today's CNN is so hopelessly biased it makes the days of Ted Turner look journalistically rigorous.  Back then, at least a few CNN hosts would fake up a just-the-facts mien.  Now every last CNN host is a strident anti-Trump pundit.  It is all opinion, all the time, as hosts search high and low for every conceivable angle from which to attack Trump.  The hosts will often preface these tendentious segments with a little lecture to the audience on how CNN deals in "facts" but the president peddles "lies."  One would think the country was on the brink of dissolution from the tone of CNN's hysterical coverage.  Instead, what usually occasions it is nothing more than an imprecise presidential tweet.

Study: CNN Media Unit of Stelter & Darcy 'Reliably' Obsessed with 'Right-Wing' Media.  David Rutz at the Washington Free Beacon took the time to confirm what everyone conservative could suspect:  CNN's Media Unit obsesses over conservative or "far-right" media, and defends the left-wing press as somehow non-ideological. [...] Fox News is an outlier in a sea of Democrat-enabling media, but that makes them "outsized" only in the sense that there's any pushback on a tremendously hostile media establishment.  The Left seems outraged that anyone dares to define "news" differently than they do, and refuses to bury stories or narratives they want buried.

Rooting for the Virus?  CNN Boasts Pandemic Is 'Beating' 'Irrelevant' Trump 'Badly'.  Through its rhetoric on the coronavirus pandemic, CNN has made it abundantly clear its goal has been to send Americans into mentally-crippling fear over the coronavirus pandemic and blaming President Trump directly for the rampant loss of life.  Thursday's Situation Room did that in reacting to the White House Coronavirus Task Force briefing, bragging that "the chickens [have come] home to roost" for the "dishonestly rosy" Trump as it's "beating him and beating him badly."  In other words, optimism and hope for tomorrow is poisonous to the health of CNN's narrative.  There's an obvious balance between denial of the pandemic's seriousness and outright doom and gloom, but CNN has never been concerned about that or our collective psyche.

CNN Reporter Melts Down After Trump Campaign Spox Uses CNN Link to Disprove Her Coronavirus Claims.  CNN anchor Brianna Keilar had Trump campaign communications director Tim Murtaugh on the network earlier today to talk about the Trump administration's Wuhan virus response.  As things often do on CNN when a Trump official is part of a segment, the interview got contentious fast.  Keilar disputed numerous claims made by Murtaugh, including statements about how Dr. Anthony Fauci has recommended the use of the Trump-touted hydroxychloroquine and how some studies have shown it's an effective drug when used in concert with other treatments.  You'll remember that the media and Democrats have spent almost the entirety of the outbreak trying to downplay the drug as a possible coronavirus treatment because Orange Man Bad.  Studies have been mixed on it, with some showing some successes in using the drug and others not.  Some of the studies the media have definitively touted as debunking the idea of using hydroxychloroquine as a treatment either used flawed methodology (read about another one [elsew]here), were discredited, or were actually retracted.

CNN Pushes Joe Biden As A 'Man Of Faith' Who Can Win Over Evangelical Voters.  The liberal media mocks and disrespects people of faith in America all the time.  But now that we have an election coming up, CNN rushes in to prop up Joe Biden as some sort of deeply religious man, suggesting he can appeal to evangelicals.

CNN Is Obsessed With Latest Trump Tell-All Book.  Maybe Someone Should Write a Book About CNN?  CNN is obsessed with yet ANOTHER "tell-all" book about Donald Trump.  The network doesn't care if these products are true, just that they trash the President.  If CNN is SO interested in tell-all books, maybe someone should write one about the liberal cable channel.  How would they like that?  On Wednesday morning's [1/15/2020] New Day, CNN co-hosts John Berman and Alisyn Camerota brought on political correspondent Sara Murray and political commentator Errol Louis to hype Mary Trump's book and to make outrageous claims about the president's supporters.  Without any fact checking, the hacks took the claims that Mary Trump makes about President Trump at face value in an effort to make it a campaign issue.  Louis also venomously declared that Trump supporters are white "supremacists" and that they are "those who were always opposed to all of the civil rights movement from the 1960s forward."

Juvenile Hack Cooper Snarks Over 'Tan Man' Trump, Claims He Doesn't Care About Dead Americans.  Having long since lost any semblance of sanity as a real journalist, CNN's AC360 host and pundit Anderson Cooper began Tuesday's [7/14/2020] show with a predictably sophomoric commentary masquerading as journalism with the chyron labeling it a "Keeping Them Honest" segment.  This time, Cooper employed his usual condescension, feigning of outrage, pauses, sighs, and slight tilts of the head to attack "artificially tan man" President Trump as someone who should be removed from his job.  Worse yet, Cooper insisted Trump possessed no concern for the 136,000-plus dead Americans from the coronavirus.

CNN's Cuomo Admits Homicides Are Rising — But Blames It On States Reopening.  CNN's Chris Cuomo admitted Wednesday evening that homicides are rising, but appeared to place the blame on states reopening rather than ongoing protests calling to defund the police.  Cuomo, alongside CNN's Don Lemon, mocked "right-wing" media just one day earlier for reporting on rising crime in major cities — although statistics show that many cities have, indeed, seen rising crime.  Cuomo appeared to backtrack Wednesday, admitting that homicides are spiking but claiming it is due to reopening the economy.

Former CNN Staffers Call Out the Network for Being 'Divisive and Boring' in the Trump Era.  CNN has become the absolute worst cable news network.  Anyone who remembers what it was like just ten years ago knows it is barely recognizable today.  Former staffers and producers appear to agree.

Not All Black Lives Matter to Black Lives Matter.  This week, CNN's Don Lemon, who has spent the last few weeks bashing the supposed thoroughgoing systemic racism of the United States, hosted black actor Terry Crews. [...] Black Lives Matter, as Crews correctly pointed out, has never restricted its mandate to the question of police violence:  It has announced that its focuses also include police brutality, transgender rights, gay rights, disrupting the nuclear family, and freeing Palestine, among other diverse topics.  So why is Lemon so deeply invested in preventing conversations about black lives?  Why, in fact, do only some black lives matter, rather than all?  That's not merely a question asked by conservatives or contrarians.  It's being asked all over the United States by black Americans being left to the predations of criminals, in large part thanks to the woke virtue signaling of many Black Lives Matter leaders and media allies.

CNN's Lemon:  The Way to Fix Mount Rushmore Is Add Obama.  Tuesday on CNN, host Don Lemon said President Barack Obama should be added to the Mount Rushmore sculptures of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, and Theodore Roosevelt.  While discussing a California couple charged for painting over a "Black Lives Matter" mural, Lemon said, [...]
Lengthy quote omitted for brevity, among other things.

CNN Actually Made an 'Outrageous' Claims List About Trump's Mt. Rushmore Speech.  President Trump visiting Mount Rushmore sent the liberal media into a total meltdown yesterday.  The fallout is still doling out insane attacks against a speech that was patriotic and attacked the Left's ongoing campaign to erase our history.  Yeah, it's pretty explicit as to why the media is hyperventilating right now.  One, Trump is still president.  Two, he's Republican.  And three, he's a cheerleader for America — how awful, right?  Well, CNN, the go-to for garbage anti-Trump takes, decided to compile a list of the most "outrageous" claims made by the president last night.  I'm not kidding.  And, uh, for those of us who aren't mind-broken by Trump or are normal in cognitive function, you're going to find this list confusing.  Why?  There's nothing outrageous about it; Trump just said it so these clowns go into an epileptic fit.

CNN's Chris Cuomo Makes an Utter Fool of Himself Interviewing St. Louis Homeowner, Gets Corrected Multiple Times.  As we've previously documented, CNN's supposedly objective "Prime Time" anchor Chris Cuomo has proven himself to be an outright embarrassment to his profession, frequently coming into interviews unprepared and always with a predetermined angle to exploit.  In addition to that, Cuomo has also shown himself to be a generally awful person and hypocrite, unwilling to hold himself (and Democrats) to the same standards he holds everyone else to.  Cuomo proved his critics right once again in every way Tuesday night [6/30/2020] in the "interview" he conducted with St. Louis, Missouri homeowner Mark McCloskey, 63, and his attorney Albert Watkins.

CNN picked the wrong person to interview about police and BLM.  What's a CNN host to do when confronted with a guest who doesn't accept The Narrative?  In the case of Don Lemon interviewing former Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke, the answer is: tell him to "keep it down," refuse to listen to what he is saying, and then abruptly cut him off.  It's not as if they are interested in anything that doesn't support The Narrative.  Much less explodes it with data on cops being killed.  [Video clip]

Unhinged CNN Spends Two Hours Mocking Rally, Questioning Trump's Health.  Why would CNN even bother going live on Saturday night [6/20/2020] for Donald Trump's rally in Tulsa, Oklahoma?  The network didn't plan to show the event.  Instead, reporters spent two hours gloating over a lower crowd size and questioning Trump's fitness to serve.  After warning for a week about the health risk of attending the rally, Blitzer opened the show at 8 PM this way:  "But in a surprising development, turnout for the event has been smaller than expected.  The campaign is blaming protesters.  The campaign is blaming the news media for the crowd size.  Clearly, not a full house."  Reporter Ryan Nobles declared victory even before the speech had begun:  "Wolf, the Trump campaign was hoping that they were going to be able to demonstrate an enormous amount of enthusiasm behind the campaign and also make the point and the economy were ready to reopen.  And at least by their own standards, fell short of those goals."  "They certainly did," cheered Blitzer.

Trump Supporter Bruce Carter, Who Happens To Be Black, Busts CNN Using Him To Create Fake News.  This video is buckets of priceless.  During a Right Side Broadcast livestream interview of President Trump supporters at the Tulsa rally, RSBN journalist Liz Willis interviews Bruce Carter, a black Trump supporter.  During the interview Ms. Willis mentions the media, and that's when Mr. Carter shares an example from moments before where CNN used him to create fake news.  Carter says "but you just mentioned the news, so someone just sent me this clip with me on CNN sometime this morning..."  Apparently CNN used a picture of Bruce Carter to frame an angry narrative that "Tulsa Braces For Clashes".  This is priceless.  [Video clip]

Trump Campaign Calls CNN's Brian Stelter 'Sexist' for Attack on Jenna Ellis.  President Donald Trump's re-election campaign accused CNN media reporter Brian Stelter of sexism on Sunday [8/14/2020] for telling campaign legal adviser Jenna Ellis that her children and grandchildren would be ashamed of her one day.  In what Mediaite called a "trainwreck" interview on Stelter's show, Reliable Sources, the host quizzed Ellis about the campaign's threat to sue CNN over a poll last week that showed former Vice President Joe Biden fourteen points ahead.

CNN's Brian Stelter goes on the attack, only to have his prey turn on him.  Brian Stelter, aged 34, rotund, and squeaky, went from creating a college blog about TV and cable news, to working as a media reporter at the New York Times right out of college, to becoming the host of CNN's (ahem) Reliable Sources and a chief media correspondent.  He's had that last gig for seven years.  Stelter thinks he's a journalist.  However, when he had senior Trump legal adviser Jenna Ellis on his Sunday show and tried to humiliate her for daring to support Trump's entirely accurate attacks against the drive-by media, Ellis called Stelter out for what he is:  An activist, rather than a journalist.  Before diving into the Ellis beatdown on Stelter, it's worth remembering that Stelter does not report on the news.  Instead, he serves as a conduit for the Democrat party.

Gathering Is Essential — Unless You're Republican.  It was an "ugly and dangerous scene."  Rioters hijacking protests?  Cops murdered?  Minority communities devastated?  No, this was CNN's description of Americans packed into Michigan's Capitol in opposition to Gov. Gretchen Whitmer's unconstitutional decree that made abortion clinics essential during the stay-at-home order, but barbershops not.  "Protests are supposed to be peaceful," CNN sneered, as Michiganders — some armed — peacefully gathered to demand their rights back.  Now, when streets are filled with George Floyd marchers and rioters, Chris Cuomo wonders since when protests had to be "peaceful," anyway?  The answer:  1791.

Kayleigh McEnany shreds Jim Acosta after he criticizes police.  White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany suggested CNN's Jim Acosta should respect police officers rather than concoct stories about them since they are "protecting you as you come into this building each and every day."  The tense exchange began with Acosta falsely accusing the President of having "gassed and pummeled protesters" as he engaged in a walk Monday to St.  John's Episcopal Church. [...] Acosta has been brutally beaten by McEnany on multiple occasions as he does his best to preen for his left-leaning audience at CNN.  Things never work out in his favor.

McEnany pounds Acosta with facts on what really went down at Lafayette Square, he still can't comprehend.  White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany fact-checked CNN chief White House correspondent Jim Acosta this Wednesday after he spewed a blatant lie at her.  The lie was the fallacious and already debunked claim that the Trump administration had "gassed and pummeled protesters" prior to President Donald Trump's "powerful" walk to St.  John's Church earlier this week.  To make matters worse, he spewed the lie while referencing deceased civil rights hero and legend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

The Media Are Lying To You About Everything, Including The Riots.  [Scroll down]  Every once in a while, you get a pundit who's so bad at lying, so unconvincing in his role as a serious newsman, the mask slips.  Often, that pundit is CNN's Don Lemon, a not-very-bright man with a penchant for letting his mask slip — like when he lost it on-air laughing at a stupid joke about how Trump supporters are ignorant rubes.  On Sunday [5/31/2020], as American cities were burning and looters were rampaging through the streets, Lemon implored America, "Open your eyes.  We are teetering on a dictatorship."  He didn't mean a dictatorship of the mob, which would have actually made sense given the facts.  No, for Lemon and his CNN colleagues the real threat is Trump, who had the audacity to declare that if mayors and governors couldn't get their cities under control, he would.

CNN Is Basically InfoWars Now as Don Lemon Has a Mental Break Live on Air.  CNN's evening broadcasts are typically a lesson is partisan ridiculousness, which would be somewhat palatable if they didn't pretend that their prime time lineup are unbiased journalists.  But last night [6/1/2020] was different.  Last night, we witnessed CNN walk up to the edge of the cliff and jump off with a mixture of hysterical laughter and mumbling about aliens. [...] This came shortly after a fairly mundane speech by the President in which he warned that he would take action against widespread violence and looting currently hampering many cities.  Somehow, that was code to Don Lemon that we are now about to become a dictatorship and that a declaration of war has been made on Americans.  This is the kind of delusion that used to get you thrown into a straight jacket, not broadcast on national TV.

Activism, Not Journalism:  CNN Correspondent Explains Rioting as Done Out of 'Pain,' Racism.  A few hours after an emotional moment on CNN in which national correspondent Sara Sidner asked a question of Minneapolis Police Chief Medaria Arradondo on behalf of the late George Floyd's family, Sidner reflected on it and, with help from Prime Time host Chris "Fredo" Cuomo, she explained to viewers why there's been widespread looting and rioting.  The excuse?  Well, it's because of the (real) "pain" from racism that racial minorities have experienced for far too long.

CNN's Gergen Calls It 'Nuts' for Bill Barr to Urge 'Law and Order'.  Late Saturday afternoon [5/30/2020], during live coverage of the protests and riots in reaction to the police-involved death of Minneapolis resident George Floyd, CNN host John Berman and senior political analyst David Gergen fretted over Attorney General Bill Barr calling for "law and order" in a statement addressing the violence.  Gergen called the choice of words a "dog whistle" and declared it to be "nuts" that it was included in the statement.

Don Lemon blames Trump for Democrat riots, says we asked for it.  Protests are only dangerous if the right-wing Americans hold them according to the media, although the right didn't damage a thing and merely wanted to go back to work.  Just ask Don Lemon, he said the right-wing protests were dangerous, but he has no problem with the Democrat riots, which he still refers to as protests.  Don Lemon fanned the flames on his show last night, continuing to blame President Trump for the Democrat riots.  He believes the riots are all understandable and we are all to blame for this.  It's our fault that criminals and rioters are going scorched earth.  They're just frustrated and their behavior is "tragic" and "understandable."

Watch These Smug CNN Promos Touting Their Own Riots Coverage, Reporter Being Arrested.  Don't let any national journalist tell you that they don't want to be a part of the story.  On Friday night [5/29/2020] into early Saturday morning, CNN eagerly turned around not one but two promos touting their coverage of the Minneapolis riots, including the disturbing and despicable arrest of correspondent Omar Jimenez and his crew less than 24 hours prior on New Day. So, our New York and Washington-based journalists want to claim that they're uncomfortable with the spotlight?  Either that's a total lie or they should have a word with their bosses about whether their dangerous work should translate into stardom and hero worship.  [Video clip]

CNN Host Insists Voter Fraud is 'Basically Nonexistent', Gets Schooled by Alabama Sec of State.  As Democrats use the "gift" of the pandemic to push voting by mail, arrogant CNN host Brianna Keilar asked her guest, Alabama Secretary of State John Merrill, if he's "aware that the research shows that in-person voting is more likely to result in voter fraud, which, overall, is basically nonexistent?"  I'd like to take a look at the research she was referring to that produced such an obviously inaccurate result.  Maybe according to the Brennan Center for Justice, as in John Brennan, that's a truthful statement.  However, the evidence shows that mail-in votes are far more likely to be compromised than in-person votes, and rather than being "basically nonexistent" as Keilar maintains, voter fraud happens with great frequency.  She is well aware of that.  Throughout their discussion, Keilar maintained a thinly disguised look of scorn on her face and continually interrupted Merrill.

'That is a false statement': Liberal law professor slams CNN for coverage of edited clip favoring Biden.  Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley criticized CNN for "media indulgence" after they ran a selectively edited clip favorable to former Vice President Joe Biden.  "CNN's John King just began a question on how 'some are trying to make a big deal over' Biden's 'you're not black' comment," Turley, a self-described liberal and George Washington University law professor said on Twitter.  "CNN then played the clip ending with 'I extended the Voting Rights Act 25 years.  I have a record that is second to none.'"  "However, the quote was edited to exclude the next line:  'The NAACP has endorsed me every time I've run.  Come on, take a look at my record.'  That is a false statement that the NAACP has publicly rebutted.

CNN Reporter Who Chastised Trump for Non-Mask Usage Rips off Mask the Moment She Thinks the Cameras Are Off.  It's almost like all these reporters wearing masks while not being within 10 feet of anyone are just virtue signaling to push a partisan narratives.  Crazy thought, right?  CNN's Kaitlin Collins, who has tried to make a name for herself by getting into confrontations throughout the Wuhan virus pandemic (see Dr. Birx Takes CNN Reporter Apart After Attempted Gotcha Question), was caught red-handed yesterday.  As the press briefing ended and the cameras were assumed off, the "journalist" jumped out of her seat and ripped her mask off, even as she immediately walked closer to her colleagues.

CNN Spent Nearly Two Years Lapping Up Schiff's Collusion Lies.  For nearly two years, CNN eagerly offered itself up as a platform for House Democrat Adam Schiff and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper to claim there was "significant evidence" of collusion between the 2016 Trump campaign and Russia.  But after the May 7 release of transcripts in which numerous top-level Obama officials admitted they'd seen no evidence of collusion, CNN should be embarrassed by their cozy relationship with Schiff and others who strung the liberal cable network along for 22 months.  Clapper himself was among the officials interviewed by the House Intelligence Committee.  On July 17, 2017, the former DNI admitted under oath:  "I never saw any direct empirical evidence that the Trump campaign or someone in it was plotting/conspiring with the Russians to meddle in the election."  [Video clip]

Obama Hatched the Coup in an Oval Office Meeting on January 5, 2017.  [Scroll down]  CNN has had a meltdown over this.  CNN's meltdown yesterday and last night was total.  And they're not even covering it today.  The entire foundation, the entire reason that the American media has been getting up and going to work for the past three years just blew up in their faces yesterday.  There has never been anything they assured us there was.  There was no collusion.  There was no Trump as a Russian agent.  There was no Russian interference in the election or the outcome.  The Russians had nothing to do with who won and who lost the election.  There was never any evidence suggesting that they did play any role.  Folks, this is the biggest political scandal certainly in my lifetime.  It was the complete array of the Washington establishment against one man, Donald Trump.  And it was purposed to destroy him, his family, his career, his businesses and to get him out of office and to reverse the election results of 2016.  And they never had a shred of evidence for any of it.

The Chicom News Network.  Bill Weir hates Jesus, America, and the internal combustion engine — not necessarily in that order.  His job as Chief Climate Correspondent at CNN gives Weir ample opportunity to express his hatred of America's petroleum-consuming habits, but it was not until recently that Weir explained how he blames Christianity for the world's problems.  In a bizarre online essay entitled "To my son, born in the time of coronavirus and climate change," Weir implies that the pandemic is somehow related to global warming, connected by "stories in a very old book" (i.e., the Bible) to explain why "we burned gasoline for no good reason."  Does that make sense?  No, not logically, but Weir's emotional gestalt pattern connects these dots without regard to logic.

What does CNN know about the Biden assault allegation that we don't?  Thanks to New York Times Executive Editor Dean Baquet's admission that their extraordinarily late piece on Reade's allegation was stealth-edited after interference from the Biden campaign, we already know that Team Biden is actively shaping media coverage of the allegation and, more worrisome, that supposedly independent media organizations are complying.  Given CNN's relative silence on the Reade allegation, the network's top bosses' toxic obsession with Trump, and the size of the Larry King Live archive on Google Play, it cannot possibly be ruled out that the episode's disappearance was the result of Biden-backing CNN executives intentionally memory-holing it.  Now tell me, do you corrupt your credibility so thoroughly when you think a man is innocent?

The Wolf who cried boy.  After weeks of taking endless and often irrelevant questions daily from a hostile press, President Donald John Trump took none at Friday's briefing on corona virus.  Wolf Blitzer of AT&T's Cosmic Nonsense Network called the president chicken for not indulging a self-important press with a moment to pretend they are as important as the president.  La dee dah.  His network airs the least amount of these daily briefings among the 3 major cable news channels.  It is pretty difficult to make the case that you are interested in informing the public when you don't show the press briefings.

CNN's Acosta:  Trump 'Sending Out Protesters' to Pressure Governors to Reopen.  Tuesday [4/21/2020] on CNN's "Situation Room," network White House reporter Jim Acosta accused President Donald Trump of "sending out protesters to the statehouses" to pressure governors to reopen their states.

Following Backlash, CNN Scrambles To Stealth Edit Article Repeating Chinese PLA Propaganda.  CNN scrambled to quietly edit an article repeating Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) propaganda Wednesday morning following backlash.  The article, published April 13, relies on a report from the PLA claiming that their Navy "has done a much better job controlling coronavirus than the US Navy."  Portions of CNN's write-up are extremely similar to the PLA's military press release.  The Daily Caller first reported on CNN's PLA propaganda push using a blurb from their "live updates" page, which appears to have been published shortly before the longer, separate article that has since been updated.

Biden's Running Mate Has Been Picked For Him.  This, in part explains the moving goalposts for the current pandemic.  Over the weekend, CNN's Jake Tapper among others mysteriously began asking if it will be safe to vote in November.  Huh?  I thought we were talking about May 1st as a target date to get the country up and running again.  Why ask about six months from now?  It's not unlike a player faking an injury in the last minutes of the game when they have no timeouts left.  Stretch the clock.  Buy some time.  Sew confusion and new narratives.  "What if it's unsafe to vote?  How can we trust Trump won't try to screw us out of voting?  What if Trump tries to suppress the vote?"  Just pick your wild-eyed narrative now.  Should the economy rebound and Trump look like he could win re-election, they're going to need a new Russia scandal to blame.

It's Good to Be a Democrat.  Joe Biden, the presumptive Democratic Party nominee, has been credibility accused of sexual assault by a former staffer named Tara Reade.  Don't search her name on CNN's website.  As of this writing they have not done a single report about her and her story.  They don't care.  Moreover, they don't want their audience to know.  But audiences do know.  Thanks to the Internet, the old liberal tactic of ignoring stories they don't like can't work anymore.

CNN's bad week gets worse when DNI busts network for running 'inaccurate' anti-Trump story.  CNN is just not having a good week, it seems.  While harrumphing over a claim Vice President Mike Pence's office was not allowing the nation's top health officials to appear on CNN to discuss the coronavirus outbreak, the network got busted running with a story that the office of the director of national intelligence told them contained "inaccurate information."  As part of an ongoing media campaign to suggest that Trump was slow to respond to the Chinese virus COVID-19, thus costing thousands of American lives, CNN run with a report that said the president was warned "as early as November" about the virus.  The network appears to exist in a bubble all to itself, oblivious to the reality that many Americans see its obsession with trying to destroy Trump and agree with the president that CNN is indeed "fake news."

Study: While CNN Bashes Trump, They Barely Covered Virus Outbreak.  CNN's latest Trump-bashing narrative is something to the tune of:  Everyone knew the coronavirus was a serious problem in January, and everyone was taking it immensely seriously except for President Trump and his incompetent administration.  Yet a Media Research Center analysis finds CNN's own coverage of the virus in January and early February was incredibly deficient, as the liberal cable network was reluctant to devote much time to anything unrelated to Trump's impeachment.  MRC analysts examined all of CNN's daily programming from 6:00 am to midnight EST between January 17 (the first day any news network discussed the coronavirus) through February 5.  Our analysts found that CNN's January coronavirus airtime averaged 12 minutes per day, or about 40 seconds per hour.  That works out to a meager 1.6 percent of their total coverage, even after excluding an average of 21 minutes of ad time per hour on the network.  By comparison, the three major broadcast networks (ABC, CBS, and NBC) projected a clear sense of urgency from the start.

Coronavirus Consequences Coming into View.  The new Democratic pre-electoral chorus is already audibly arising like a Wagnerian finale from the largely hidden choir. [...] CNN's Brian Stelter, one of the battle-scarred, grizzled, veterans of the Long March of media Trump-haters, choreographically synchronized with the Washington Post, New York Times, and MSNBC, has already kicked off this new campaign, on the air and on the internet. [...] For so long Stelter has uttered the old stock phrases "walls are closing in," and "the drip, drip, drip," and the almost daily "bombshell" of each new damaging allegation (that evaporated overnight), that he could be operating on autocue as he storms out of the firehall again, tearing through the pandemic-deserted streets to assault the president on a completely spurious charge one more time.  No one can deny the vigor and imperishability of the hate and vitriol that propels the president's media enemies again and again, no matter how often they are mowed down by the facts.

Does America need Journalists?  I generally believed the national press corps had hit rock bottom somewhere between Russian Roulette, Brett Kavanaugh, and the Ukrainian Money Club.  But that was before COVID-19.  They have since dug through the rock bottom to new depths.  These aren't journalists on display.  They are vile anti-American partisan activists, or to put it in terms CNN might understand, an apple is never a banana.  As for our intrepid hero, Cilliza, I suffered through his last eight articles at the time of this writing out of a morbid sense of curiosity to see how a real journalist who wears an ugly sweatshirt writes.  Every single article was an attack on the president or another Republican or spun as great news for Democrats, with wishful thinking for a future President Cuomo thrown in for size.  That's what it means to be a journalist who "cuts through the political spin," as his description on CNN heralds.

Dr. Fauci Slaps Down CNN's Jim Acosta Attempt To Say Trump's Coronavirus Response Was Too Slow.  CNN reporter Jim Acosta attempted to get Dr. Anthony Fauci to say the President didn't react quickly enough to the coronavirus crisis.  In fact, he said the exact opposite.  Acosta inquired as to whether or not the administration had taken enough action when countries such as South Korea and China were grappling with the outbreak.  The exchange between him and Fauci took place during Tuesday's coronavirus task force briefing.

CNN Analyst:  It's 'Ridiculous' Trump Thinks 'We're Rooting Against Him in This Crisis'.  President Trump pushed back at CBS reporter Paula Reid on Wednesday when she pushed the usual "nonpartisan experts say you're all wrong" line on him.  After the live briefing, CNN host Wolf Blitzer turned to in-house analysts Daniel Dale — the "fact checker" — and Gloria Borger.  Dale didn't check any facts, lamely noticing that Trump can't have any rallies, but he repeats his catch phrases like "big beautiful wall."  Thanks, genius.  Then Wolf Blitzer turned to Borger to lament the attack on those Nonpartisan Journalists.  [Video clip]

CNN Twitter account claimed date of Ohio primary has been changed.  It hasn't.  CNN's Twitter account has over 45 million followers.  Many of them are in Ohio.  According to a Tweet by CNN, Tuesday's primary election has been moved to June.  It has not.  Will Twitter suspend the account for spreading false election information?  Their Terms of Service indicate they should, and they have suspended much smaller accounts in the past for even making jokes that seem to be election date, time, or location "disinformation."

CNN's Jake Tapper Admits He Allowed Ocasio-Cortez to Lie About Trump.  CNN's Jake Tapper is admitting he knew Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) told a lie about President Trump on his Sunday show and he chose to not challenge or correct her.  This is a remarkable admission from an increasingly unstable CNN anchor, who just last week demanded the American president stop communicating directly with the American people.

Coronavirus and the Party of Death.  On the coronavirus channel, CNN, one can always count on regular updates about the number of fatalities from the virus.  In hushed tones, the hosts reveal that the "number has reached 150."  Imagine such hosts speaking so gravely about the number of deaths each day from abortion, which is around 4,000.  Imagine them putting that number in a box on the bottom of the screen.  Of course, it would never happen.  Most of the pundits on CNN who hysterically swoon over coronavirus cases and deaths support abortion and euthanasia.

Chris Cuomo blasts Trump for saying 'Chinese virus': 'It could have come from anywhere'.  CNN commentator Chris Cuomo admonished President Trump for repeatedly calling the coronavirus "the Chinese virus."  "Calling it the Chinese virus or the Wuhan virus or the Kung Flu.  Listen, you may think it's clever, but it's hurting," Cuomo said on his nightly show on Wednesday.  "The idea, 'Well, it did come from China.'  Then why doesn't Fauci and other top health officials, why don't they call it that?  You know why?  Because it could have come from anywhere."  The virus, which has sparked a global pandemic, is believed to have originated in an animal market in Wuhan, China.  Trump has said he uses the phrase "Chinese virus" for accuracy purposes.  Critics say Trump is being racist or is scapegoating.

All the Establishment Media's Dangerous Coronavirus Lies.  America's deeply unserious but very corrupt and unreliable establishment media have no intention of changing their dangerous ways in the age of the Wuhan coronavirus.  Watching the media spread lies and unnecessary panic over the last few weeks reminds me of the CNN Race Riots of 2014. [...] The lies and hate spread by the corporate media resulted in multiple nights of rioting in the working class, predominantly black city of Ferguson, Missouri.  Then, like a plague of locusts, and apparently under the impression the city doesn't already have enough problems, CNN moved on to Baltimore. [...] Coronavirus is not a D.C. food fight.  Like the CNN Race Riots of 2014, it affects everyday people:  we have shut down our economy.  The stock market is going insane.  People are scared, worried, stressed, and have reason to be.  Even if you remove the fear of the virus, no one can escape the fear of the panic, and the media's blatant lies are only adding to this uncertainty and fear — and are doing so by design.

Pence Spox:  CNN's Jim Sciutto Spreads Fake News of Nationwide Curfew.  Vice President Mike Pence's Press Secretary called out CNN's Jim Sciutto Monday morning for spreading an anonymous claim that the Trump administration is considering imposing a curfew across the country.  "New:  There are active discussions within the Trump administration to encourage a possible 'curfew' across the nation in which non-essential businesses would have to close by a certain time each night," Sciutto wrote on social media, citing "CNN reporting."

CNN Spins Biden Lying, Cursing Out Voter: 'Some People See That as Charming'.  How many gaffes and hostile interactions with voters does 2020 Democrat frontrunner Joe Biden have to make before the media notices or cares?  On Tuesday morning Biden was caught in yet another uncomfortable moment, cursing and lying to a man who confronted him during a campaign stop over his stance on guns.  Instead of ignoring the incident as they typically do, CNN decided to cover for Biden by spinning it positively and refraining from fact-checking.

Dershowitz: I'm Thinking of Suing CNN for Their Lies.  CNN, along with other media, pride themselves on testing statements made by presidential candidates and others for their truthfulness or falsity.  But who is testing the truthfulness or falsity of statements made by CNN and other media?  A case in point.  CNN repeatedly claimed and continues to claim through its reporters and talking heads — that during the impeachment trial I had told senators, in the words of Paul Begala, that presidents are "immune from every criminal act, so long as they could plausibly claim they did it to boost their re-election effort."  Some talking heads went so far as to say that I told the senate that a president could shoot his opponent, or tamper with voting machines, as long as he believed his re-election was in the public interest.  Joe Lockhart compared me to Hitler, Stalin, and Mussolini and said my argument would lead to genocide.  A simple truth-check, if CNN had bothered to conduct one, would have shown that I said exactly the opposite of what CNN said I had said[.]

Trump campaign sues CNN over 'false and defamatory' statements, seeks millions in damages.  President Trump's re-election campaign filed a libel lawsuit against CNN on Friday for publishing "false and defamatory" statements about seeking Russia's help in the 2020 election.  "The complaint alleges CNN was aware of the falsity at the time it published them but did so for the intentional purpose of hurting the campaign while misleading its own readers in the process... the campaign filed this lawsuit against CNN and the preceding suits against The New York Times and The Washington Post to hold the publishers accountable for their reckless false reporting and also to establish the truth," Senior Legal Adviser to Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.  Jenna Ellis told Fox News.

TV Networks, Led By CNN And MSNBC, Have Aired Misleading Bloomberg Ad More Than 70 Times.  TV networks, led by CNN and MSNBC, have aired a Michael Bloomberg ad more than 70 times in recent days in which the 2020 Democratic presidential hopeful falsely said he led New York City through 9/11.  "I led a complex, diverse city through 9/11, and I have common sense plans to move America away from chaos to progress," Bloomberg said in a 30-second campaign ad called "It Won't Work."  The problem with the claim is that Bloomberg did not take over as mayor of the Big Apple until Jan. 1, 2002, several months after terrorists flew airplanes into the World Trade Center towers in Manhattan.  Rudolph Giuliani served as mayor when the attacks occurred.

CNN panel manages to blame Trump for media infatuation with Avenatti.  Now that creepy porn lawyer Michael Avenatti has been convicted of trying to extort Nike, those who gave him a national platform in the hopes he could somehow bring down President Donald Trump are engaged in a little revisionist history.  It was because networks like CNN and MSNBC are so obsessed with destroying the president that Avenatti became such a darling for the left in the first place, but leave it to CNN to now try to spin that reality and come out of this mess blaming Trump.

CNN's Don Lemon Claims Democrats Are [a] 'Centrist Party'.  In spite of all the solidly liberal positions that Democratic politicians adopt in order to win their party's nomination for various offices, CNN host Don Lemon on Monday claimed that the party is actually a "centrist party" as he and liberal contributor Joe Lockhart discussed the popularity of the far-left Bernie Sanders.  At one point, Lemon bragged, "I've been giving people the facts about the Democratic party that it's actually a centrist party, right?"

The Editor says...
The current Democratic Party candidates are in a race to the political left, actively competing to see who can be the most extreme.  The Abortion Party is as extreme as it can be in its relentless promotion of infanticide.  The Democrats have created a welfare system that punishes fatherhood and encourages perpetual dependence on Big Government.  The Democrats are soft on crime, cozy with the theocratic Muslims, and proud of opening doors for transvestites.  The Democrats have made it abundantly clear that they don't want you to have firearms.  (No communist dictator anywhere in the world would want you to have firearms.)  If you are forced to bake a wedding cake for a same-sex marriage, it's because of the Democrats.  If you go into a public restroom and find a transvestite in there, it's because of the Democrats.  If you go to a restaurant and they won't give you a plastic straw, it's because of the Democrats.  If you drive downtown and see homeless bums defecating in the streets, it's because of the Democrats.  If you have kids in high school who can't add two numbers without a calculator, it's because of the Democrats.  If one of your school kids comes home and tries to tell you there are 63 genders, it's because of the Democrats.  If you go to a movie theater and you are bombarded with nudity, blasphemy, and profanity, it's because of the Democrats.  If some teenager gets snooty with you because you didn't use his or her "preferred pronouns," it's because of the Democrats.  If you go to the polls and leave there unsure if you vote will be counted, it's because of the Democrats.  If you're afraid to tell a stranger that you voted for President Trump, it's because of the Democrats.  If you hear the TV news people screaming about a "climate emergency," when you know there's nothing abnormal about the weather, it's because of the Democrats.  The Democratic Party platform is replete with socialism, thanks to people like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and if Bernie Sanders is the party's presidential nominee, there will be large chunks of outright communism mixed in as well.  There is nothing conservative or moderate or centrist about the Socialist Democratic Party.

CNN's Cascading Credibility Crisis.  CNN is currently suffering a credibility crisis unlike anything they've experienced before.  Last year, Business Insider reported that only 53% of American adults believe CNN is "credible," and among Republicans in particular, CNN's credibility has fallen "by nearly 20 percentage points since 2016." [...] There are, of course, scores of contributing factors and explanations that various people may have for mistrusting CNN. But my primary reason for no longer trusting the network comes down to the way network executives react whenever their journalists are caught behaving badly.  CNN host Don Lemon and two panelists openly mocking purportedly stupid Trump supporters last week provides one such example.  Putting aside the blatant lack of journalistic objectivity and unprofessionalism displayed throughout the segment, the question of credibility still arises in its aftermath.  Instead of apologizing or taking responsibility for his actions, Lemon tried to misrepresent what actually transpired.

CNN Busted For Fake News Against Trump, With Their Own Words.  CNN in a "fact check" posted this tweet on Thursday, declaring that President Donald Trump "falsely claims former FBI Director James Comey admitted to leaking."  We have to "fact check" the alleged fact checkers.  Of course, this tweet itself is false, as Comey himself testified before Congress and admitted that he leaked through a friend to the New York Times to get a Special Counsel appointed to go after Trump.

CNN Chyron:  "Trump Vindictive at Impeachment Acquittal 'Celebration'".  CNN ran the chyron "Trump Vindictive at Impeachment Acquittal 'Celebration'" during a White House event to mark his victory this week in the impeachment fight — and years of investigation before that.  The event, where Trump spoke extemporaneously for over an hour, featured several jabs at those who attempted to take down his administration — but also many jokes, and warm plaudits for his supporters.

America's Opinion Journalists Ranked:  The Good, The Bad, and The Worst.  [Scroll down]  Don Lemon (CNN).  At a network that features not a single distinguished reporter or commentator, but lots of propagandists, Don Lemon fits right in.  Though he sports perhaps the thinnest journalistic credentials of any network anchor, Lemon knows exactly how to push the levers, in an age of political correctness, available for self-aggrandizement.  So it is that he has called Trump a racist, even as he has declared, without evincing a hint of irony, that "the biggest terror threat in this country is white men." [...] Chris Cuomo (CNN). [...] Cuomo is the opposite of suave; he's an oaf, and not a very smart one at that.  Among the tells:  He has astonishingly averred that hate speech isn't protected by the First Amendment; and exploded in profane and bully-boy rage when a guy referred to him as Fredo.

Ted Cruz schools Cuomo:  CNN supposed to want to discover the truth, not help Dems cover it up.  Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, has been consistent throughout the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump, wanting to shine a light on the nefarious actions of former Vice President Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden, in regard to Ukraine.  To that end, Cruz slammed CNN for trying to cover up the younger Biden's role — the liberal media has been unified in saying there has been "no evidence" of wrongdoing.

Fact Check:  CNN Falsely Claims 'GOP Concedes Trump May Have Withheld Aid But Says It's Not Impeachable'.  CLAIM: "GOP concedes Trump may have withheld aid for probes but says it's not impeachable." — CNN  VERDICT:  FALSE.  The claim is not based on a single quote or piece of evidence and relies on distortions.

The Death of Cable News in One Clip.  [Scroll down]  CNN, from which "news" channel the clip comes, is perhaps the worst offender of all, having deliberately contrived and cultivated a stable of guests whose defining characteristic is not analytical skill or eloquence or reflexive independence of thought, but rather Possession of a Strong Opinion about Donald Trump.  On CNN, Trump is the North Star.  He is the point around which all must be graphed; the question to which all others must be subordinated; the one piece of data that predicts and explains everything else.  Bit by bit, the channel has become Fox News with a different predilection.  It is Us v. Them, without break.  And, as on Fox, the "us" and the "them" on CNN are alarmingly narrow in scope.  63 million Americans voted for Donald Trump.  Are they all slack-jawed yokels motivated by hostility to geography, and facts?  Do they all — or even most — have strong Southern accents?  And, irrespective, is a Southern accent a predictor of stupidity?

Don Lemon addresses CNN panel mocking Trump voters.  CNN anchor Don Lemon appeared to be on the defensive on Tuesday night [1/28/2020] after a panel discussion mocking Trump supporters went viral. [...] "During an interview on Saturday night, one of my guests said something that made me laugh.  And while in the moment, I found that joke humorous.  And I didn't catch everything that was said."  The anti-Trump anchor added, "Just to make it perfectly clear, I was laughing at the joke and not at any group of people."  It is unclear what specific joke Lemon was referring to.  The first joke was at the expense of President Trump while the rest of the jokes were at the expense of his supporters.

CNN Panel Led by Don Lemon Trashes Trump Supporters as Ignorant Rednecks Who Can't Read.  CNN hit a new low this weekend mocking and laughing out loud at uneducated, redneck Trump supporters who can't even read.  This is what they think of Middle America — the 63 million Americans who voted for Donald Trump for president.  Far-left op-ed writer Wajahat Ali, and Never-Trumper Rick Wilson joined Don Lemon in the vicious assault on Trump supporters.  It could not have been more insulting.

CNN Lies About "Permitless Carry" In Kansas City Shooting.  While I no longer expect the mainstream media to not be biased in their reporting, I do expect them to be factual.  They can be plenty biased in their reporting without mangling the actual facts available, after all.  However, CNN — an outfit that still likes to bill themselves as both trusted and trustworthy — has a habit of not necessarily doing that.  They routinely get labeled "fake news" by people like President Trump and it infuriates them.  The thing is, though, if they don't want to be labeled fake news, they probably should stop doing stupid stuff like this.

CNN Blames Bar Shooting on Lax Gun Laws.  It Got The Facts Wrong.  A CNN article on a recent Kansas City bar shooting mischaracterized the shooter's criminal history to blame the killing on Missouri's gun laws.  Police identified 29-year-old Jahron Swift as the shooter who killed one woman and injured 15 before he was killed by an armed guard January 19.  CNN published a report Wednesday saying Swift likely would have gone to prison over a weapons charge if not for the state's 2017 permitless carry law.  However, the report obfuscated the date of Swift's charge to suggest the law let him off the hook for it.  All of Swift's prior arrests and weapons charges came before Missouri's gun law went into effect.  Even after it was enacted on Jan. 1, 2017, the permitless carry law would not have nullified Swift's pending unlawful use of weapons charges.  But regardless of the permitless carry law, Swift was convicted of two felonies and therefore could not have legally carried a gun.

CNN Analyst Fabricates Quotes From GOP Senators to Smear Trump, Fox News.  On Wednesday afternoon [1/22/2020], a CNN analyst cooked up a "conversation" between two Republican senators in order to smear President Donald Trump, his party, and Fox News.  He later admitted to having completely fabricated the quotes, but only after The Washington Post's self-described conservative Jennifer Rubin retweeted his "report."

CNN Hack Tweets Out "Overheard Convo" Between GOP Senators Panicking About Impeachment — Later Admits He Made it All Up.  CNN political analyst and former Comms for the Clinton White House, Joe Lockhart tweeted out an "overheard convo" between Republican Senators who were supposedly panicking because of what Schiff said during his impeachment tirade. [...] After his tweet went viral with thousands of retweets and 10's of thousands of 'likes' with 'conservative' WaPo blogger Jennifer Rubin retweeting it, Lockhart admitted he made up the entire conversation.  "Ok maybe I made up the convo, but you know that's exactly what they're thinking."  Lockhart tweeted.

CNN Makes Most Perfect CNN Hire In History.  Tuesday was now former editor-at-large for CNBC John Harwood's first day at CNN as a network White House correspondent.  Less than a week after CNN complained that one of its reporters was called a "liberal hack," CNN hired a liberal hack.  Harwood is a textbook example of a biased reporter masquerading around the nation's capital as an "objective journalist," on a noble quest to uncover the truth in clear and honest reporting in a media environment saturated with fake news.  There is certainly no shortage of examples to illustrate Harwood's left-wing bias, but then again, the list to showcase CNN's runs even longer, making the pair a perfect fit.

Progressive Petards.  Since at least 2016, CNN has mostly ceased being a news agency, but that hasn't stopped it from being an active participant in #TheResistance.  The network is so caught up in the fervor of this movement that many of its guests and regular hosts have been fired, reprimanded, or apologized for threats to the president or general obscene references (e.g., Reza Aslan, the late Anthony Bourdain, Kathy Griffin).  Many of its marquee reporters have resigned, were fired, or reassigned for fake-news bias (e.g., Thomas Frank, Eric Lichtblau, and Lex Haris), or came under fire for false reporting (Jim Sciutto, Marshall Cohen, and Carl Bernstein) or have had to offer retractions and/or apologies (Gloria Borger, Eric Lichtblau, Jake Tapper, and Brian Rokus.)  Its anchors have apologized for obscenity (Anderson Cooper) or simply making up false statements (Chris Cuomo), while analysts have been caught in a number of contradictions about their own role in on-going scandals (James Clapper).  The common denominator has been the new journalistic ethos that aborting the Trump presidency justifies any means necessary to achieve such noble ends.

If CNN Can't Take Punches, They Shouldn't Be Throwing Them.  As a guy who grew up in Philly I'd like to inform CNN that you don't get to come to the playground, smack everyone around and then run to the teacher when they hit you back.  So here are a few jabs for you purveyors of pure, unbiased truth.  Lets run down the list of people you told viewers are likely to take down Trump over the past few years.  James Comey, Robert Mueller, Michael Cohen, Michael Flynn, Michael Avenatti, the whistleblower, the SDNY, Andrew McCabe, Stormy Daniels, and now John Bolton and Lev Parnas.  The mathematical probability of being that wrong, that often while acting in good faith falls somewhere between zero and zero.  Do they hate their viewers?  Its like they are in an abusive relationship with them where they prey on their emotions, contently promising a better, Trump-free tomorrow, constantly disappointing that expectation.

Trump Administration Ushered in an Age of Truth Over Decorum.  One refreshing result of the age of Trump is the sudden emphasis of truth over propriety that even lawmakers have now adopted.  Although CNN is having a hard time dealing with it, the network may want to simply sit this one out and accept reality. [...] When CNN was launched in 1980, its slogan was, "The most trusted name in news" — and it was.  It's latest slogan is, "Go there" — and it does, whether it should or not.  As for Trump, liberal pundits and Democratic politicians often accuse members of the administration, and especially the president, of repeatedly lying.  What the administration has actually done is to usher in an age of truth over decorum.  It just takes a while getting used to it.

CNN's bias is now beyond laughable.  As Sen. Martha McSally (R-Ariz.) walked through the hallways of the Senate Thursday, CNN senior congressional correspondent Manu Raju asked her if the Senate should consider "new evidence as part of the impeachment trial."  McSally shot back:  "Manu, you're a liberal hack.  I'm not talking to you."  "You're not going to comment about this?" a dazed Raju asked.  "You're a liberal hack, buddy," McSally replied as she walked away.  Predictably, conservatives cheered, while mainstream media decried McSally's move as unbecoming.  Whatever your take, the interaction reflects three years of mounting frustration with an overtly partisan media, exemplified by CNN, which has dropped any pretense of fairness and become an organ of the Democratic Party.  The problem isn't that Raju asked the question — that's his job, after all.  It's that virtually all questions posed by political reporters these days are framed to support the narratives and assumptions of one political party, the Democrats.

CNN Is The Home of Liberal Hacks.  U.S. Senator Martha McSally (R-AZ) created a firestorm of controversy this week when she called CNN reporter Manu Raju "a liberal hack." [...] Raju and his CNN colleagues are all "liberal hacks."  Other than an occasional token conservative analyst or guest, the entire CNN roster of producers and on-air talent, including all the network's hosts, is composed of steadfast liberals, progressives and socialists.  In fact, one of their major personalities is Van Jones, a self-proclaimed communist.  Other Republican officeholders should follow McSally's lead and refuse to appear on CNN. As tweeted by U.S. Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX), CNN media personalities are not real "journalists."  He noted that they "relentlessly attack every Republican" and "always, always push the prevailing Dem narrative of the moment."

Sanders Supporters Shocked to Find Bias at CNN.  [Scroll down]  Conservatives have been making the same point for decades, only to be sneered at by progressives who insisted that such claims were conspiracy theories.  In reality, it has long been obvious that CNN operates more like the PR department for the Democratic National Committee (DNC) than a legitimate news outlet.  The last time Sanders ran for president, CNN commentator Donna Brazile gave Hillary Clinton advance copies of debate questions during the Democratic primary.  It was CNN's Candy Crowley who jumped in to back up erstwhile President Barack Obama on a brazen lie about Benghazi during a debate with Mitt Romney.  If it isn't obvious, the DNC is terrified of Sanders.  They know he doesn't have a prayer of beating Trump and that the latter would like nothing better than to run against an unrepentant socialist.  The problem is that Sanders is doing better than expected in the polls, particularly in Iowa and New Hampshire.

Nasty CNN Warns VA Gun Rights Supporters Could Cause Violence Like Charlottesville.  Wednesday afternoon's [1/15/2020] CNN Newsroom ended with host Brooke Baldwin and correspondent Jason Carroll serving as chief fear mongers on behalf of "Governor Blackface" Ralph Northam (D-VA), parroting fears that Monday's Lobby Day in support of the Second Amendment could bring violence a la Charlottesville.  Baldwin also repeatedly fixated on the event and the possibility of violence falling on Martin Luther King Jr.  Day, so there was that angle that one could assume was a hint at a charge of racism.

CNN fighting with Babylon Bee over who has the fakest news.  It all started with an article the Bee, a self-described "Trusted Source For Christian News Satire" site, published that poked fun at the Democrats' reaction to President Trump ordering the strike on Iranian terror master Qassem Soleimani.  The satiric piece entitled Democrats Call For Flags To Be Flown At Half-Mast To Grieve Death Of Soleimani is hilarious, and like all good satire, it works because it's an exaggeration of something that is actually happening.  CNN's Donie O'Sullivan read a tweet about how popular the piece is and immediately took issue with the Bee.  It seems, much to his and CNN's chagrin that the Bee's article received more social media engagement than top stories at the New York Times and CNN had over the course of a full week.

Come clean, CNN.  "We stand by our reporting."  That phrase is a go-to in media industry public relations, unleashed when events appear to debunk an outlet's precious scoop.  It's right up there with "We don't comment on personnel matters" and "We don't comment on editorial deliberations."  And there "We stand by our reporting" was in a CNN statement to the Erik Wemple Blog, which had asked the network about its anchors' repeated claims that the dossier compiled by former British intelligence official Christopher Steele had been corroborated to a significant degree.  "Your intel community has corroborated all the details," CNN host Alisyn Camerota told Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) in December 2017.  Other CNNers stated that "parts" or "much" of the dossier — which claimed an "extensive conspiracy" between the Trump campaign and Russia prior to the 2016 presidential election — had been corroborated.

Debunking CNN's false climate scare reporting.  A CNN article, "Shouting into the apocalypse:  The Decade in climate change," recently reached the top of Google News searches for "climate change."  The article falsely asserted climate change is to blame for recent extreme weather events, even though extreme weather events began occurring long before the invention of coal-fired power plants and SUVs.  The silver lining is the CNN article provides the opportunity for a concise rebuttal for the most common alarmist climate misinformation.

CNN Concocts Dire Warning from Joint Chiefs to Congress to Fit Their Narrative on Soleimani.  A CNN article with a very compelling headline, syndicated to dozens of websites, rocketed across social media on Saturday, triggering a viral alert and making the CNN home page.  And it conveniently reinforced CNN's days-long narrative that in killing Qasem Soleimani, President Donald Trump has not only escalated the tenuous situation in Iraq, but dramatically increased the specific and imminent risk to Americans from Iran, to the dismay and even disgruntlement of top officials, and even the chairman of the Joint Chiefs.  The article purports to report a dire warning from the Trump administration (at large) to congress (et al) that Iran is "expected" to attack American targets any day.  In keeping with the narrative.

Yes, but he's a perfect fit at CNN.
Documents Prove CNN Hired a Shameless Liar in Andrew McCabe.  Documents have emerged that prove far-left CNN hired a shameless liar in Andrew McCabe, the former deputy director of the FBI.  In August, CNN — an anti-Trump outlet that traffics in conspiracy theories, fake news, and promoting violence against Trump supporters — hired the disgraced former deputy director as a contributor and analyst.  At the time, McCabe was already out at the FBI after then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions fired him for "an unauthorized disclosure to the news media and lack[ing] candor — including under oath — on multiple occasions."

Soledad O'Brien slams Brian Stelter, CNN for booking guests who 'intentionally lie' on air.  Anchor-turned-media exec Soledad O'Brien blasted CNN and its chief media correspondent, Brian Stelter, for the network's practice of booking guests who "intentionally" lie on air.  The spat began when Stelter shared a piece about the significance of disinformation that has plagued social media. [...] This isn't the first time O'Brien went after Stelter.  Last month, she ripped the CNN icon for his response when asked how networks can get Americans interested in the impeachment hearings.

CNN Is Not a News Network.  [Scroll down]  These days, CNN is a peculiar and unlovely hybrid of progressive propaganda outlet, oleaginous media apologist, sexless cultural scold, and frenzied Donald Trump stalkerblog.  When news breaks, it is no longer useful or appropriate to tell someone, "Turn on CNN," because if he did, he would be as likely to be presented with a wall of advocacy and obsession as with the headlines of the hour.  Today, CNN does not broadcast the news; it broadcasts what it wants you to think the news is.  At long last, it has become Fox.

Is CNN beginning to reform itself?  [Scroll down]  Keep in mind that CNN has meticulously kept its viewers ignorant of most things that would cast an unfavorable light on the efforts to impeach (or even say something positive about) President Trump.  The network did not carry IG Horowitz's testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee, for instance. [...] Is CNN management finally starting to realize that they are committing slow motion suicide with their biased news coverage?

Flashback:  CNN's Jim Sciutto Defended Steele Dossier More Than Anybody.  Perhaps more than any other journalist, CNN's Jim Sciutto has championed the Steele dossier, asserting in news articles and on-air segments that the FBI had verified central parts of the salacious document, and that the bureau would have corroborated the information before using it in applications for surveillance warrants against former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.  Sciutto reported Feb. 10, 2017, that U.S. officials had "corroborated some" parts of the dossier.  He insisted Dec. 26, 2017, in a broadcast that the FBI would have corroborated information in the report before using it to spy on Page.

All impeachment all the time.  Where does that get you?
Bottom Falls Out as CNN Ratings Hit 3-Year Low.  Far-left CNN, an anti-Trump, pro-violence, racist, fake news outlet that traffics in conspiracy theories, collapsed to a three-year low in the ratings during the week of November 25.

Devin Nunes Sues CNN: Reveals He Was Not in Vienna in Late 2018, Did Not Meet Victor Shokin.  Nunes's lawsuit includes revelations of key facts that undermine the case CNN made against him, severely harming the news outlet's credibility.  The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Virginia, shows Nunes is seeking more than $435 million in damages from CNN over the fake news it printed against him.  But more importantly, it demonstrates that Nunes was 100 percent correct when he told Breitbart News before Thanksgiving that CNN's story was untrue — and that CNN was completely inaccurate in its reporting and had relied on a compromised source for its piece.

Nunes sues CNN over 'demonstrably false' Ukraine report.  Rep. Devin Nunes, the ranking Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, has filed a $435 million defamation suit against CNN over a story that alleged Nunes met with a fired Ukrainian prosecutor in an effort to dig up dirt on Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden.  The story — "Giuliani associate willing to tell Congress Nunes met with ex-Ukrainian official to get dirt on Biden" — was published Nov. 22.  It was based on the words of Joseph Bondy, the attorney for Ukrainian-born Lev Parnas, who worked closely with Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani in pursuing allegations of Ukrainian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential election as well as allegations of corruption in Ukraine involving Biden's son Hunter.  Parnas is currently under indictment on campaign finance charges.

CNN Hopes Americans Fret Over Climate 'Catastrophe' This ThanksgivingCNN Newsroom co-host Jim Sciutto and "climate correspondent" Bill Weir spent time Wednesday [11/27/2019] warning it may be "too late" to stop the upcoming environmental global catastrophe.  While most Americans are going to be enjoying their families and remembering what they are thankful for this holiday, the CNN duo claimed families would be sitting around worrying about how the world is going to become uninhabitable in the next decade.  Sciutto opened the segment hyping a new United Nations report that warned humanity was running out of time to stop the impending catastrophe.  "Folks, this is important.  A new United Nations report warns that countries are running out of time to limit — just limit, the climate crisis and it could soon be too late to prevent temperatures around the world from rising to near catastrophic levels.  This is real!" Sciutto fretted, really laying on the dramatics.

The Editor says...
There is no climate crisis.  There is no extraordinary world-wide temperature increase:  Certainly nothing you'd ever notice, and definitely nothing that can or should be fixed by shutting down all industrial activity.

CNN's pre-Thanksgiving civility lesson:  Trump defenders 'Should Be Laughed at, Ridiculed, and Scorned'.  When you consider the vast number of people forced to watch CNN as they waited at their gates for delayed airline flights on the busiest travel day of the year, one marked by weather delays in most of the country, this call for harsh derision could affect a lot of Thanksgiving dinners today.  Ridicule and scorn do not fit well with the theme of giving thanks for the blessings we receive as Americans, but then again, CNN, in the ratings tank and discredited for its repeated fake news incidents, has less to be thankful for than most Americans, enjoying higher incomes and lower taxes.

CNN's Brian Stelter Hosts Segment Branding President Trump a 'Destructive Cult Leader' Who is Using 'Mind Control'.  This network, which wants you to believe that they are neutral and unbiased, continued on to hold a serious discussion about how to make people stop supporting the president, while disparaging them as crazed cult members.

Devin Nunes To Take Swift Legal Action Against CNN For 'Demonstrably False' Story.  House Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA) announced Friday night [11/22/2019] that he is filing a lawsuit against CNN over a report that they published the same evening that alleged an indicted associate of Rudy Giuliani was willing to testify to Congress that Nunes met with a former Ukrainian prosecutor last year to discuss digging up dirt on former Vice President and current Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden.

Nunes: CNN, The Daily Beast 'Are Going to Run for Cover'.  Monday [11//25/2019] on Fox News Channel's "Hannity," Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA), the ranking Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, vowed to challenge CNN and The Daily Beast in federal court for reportage that tied him to a meeting with the Ukrainians.  Nunes told host Sean Hannity that he predicted those two outlets would "run for cover."  However, he pledged to continue his quest until those outlets were held to account.

After Impeachment TV Bombs, Media Vomits Hot Propaganda All Weekend.  I try not to watch the news on the weekend or look at/engage on social media but it was hard to avoid their efforts because the damage control was so obvious. [...] "These demonstrably false and scandalous stories published by the Daily Beast and CNN are the perfect example of defamation and reckless disregard for the truth," Nunes told Breitbart News late Friday night.  "Some political operative offered these fake stories to at least five different media outlets before finding someone irresponsible enough to publish them.  I look forward to prosecuting these cases, including the media outlets, as well as the sources of their fake stories, to the fullest extent of the law.  I intend to hold the Daily Beast and CNN accountable for their actions.  They will find themselves in court soon after Thanksgiving."

Nunes to sue CNN, Daily Beast over 'demonstrably false' stories he sought dirt on Biden.  Rep. Devin Nunes said on Saturday [11/23/2019] he plans to sue CNN and the Daily Beast for stories that accused him of meeting with a former Ukraine prosecutor in a hunt for dirt on former Vice President Joe Biden.  Mr. Nunes called "demonstrably false" an assertion from CNN's source, an attorney for Soviet-born Lev Parnas, that the California Republican met with former chief Ukraine prosecutor Viktor Shokin in Vienna in 2018.  Mr. Parnas is living under house arrest at his Florida home after federal prosecutors charged him in New York with illegally funneling foreign money into U.S. political campaigns.

CNN downplays its own FISA bombshell report, receives minimal on-air coverage.  Despite having a major bombshell website report on DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz's ongoing probe into the origins of the Russia investigation, CNN offered very little coverage of its own exclusive reporting on-air.  CNN first reported that Horowitz had been investigating an FBI official who allegedly altered a document used to obtain a FISA warrant in order to surveil Trump campaign adviser Carter Page during the 2016 election.  Horowitz reportedly turned the evidence over to U.S. Attorney John Durham, who has launched a criminal probe in the origins of the Russia investigation.  The Washington Post also verified the reporting.  However, CNN barely promoted its own digital scoop on the network.

CNN's Don Lemon Calls Trump supporters 'mental'.  On Tuesday, November 19th, CNN anchor Don Lemon made a mind-boggling statement.  He said, of the ongoing impeachment hearings, "I think on this one, the Republicans are on the wrong side of history, and they are the most hypocritical.  I'm not a partisan.  I know people think that I'm some liberal Democrat.  I'm not."  He went on to say, "I don't think the Republicans are serving themselves well."  Talk about hypocrisy!  If Lemon isn't "partisan," neither were Hitler or Stalin.  Lemon is to hypocrisy as Macy's is to Thanksgiving Day parades.

CNN's Don Lemon claims he's not 'some liberal' Democrat: 'I'm not a partisan'.  CNN host Don Lemon declared he's not "some liberal Democrat" and claimed he isn't partisan on Tuesday when discussing the ongoing impeachment hearings.  "I think on this one, the Republicans are on the wrong side of history, and they are the most hypocritical.  I'm not a partisan.  I know people think that I'm some liberal Democrat.  I'm not.  They used to think I was a conservative Republican.  I'm not," Lemon said during his nightly handoff with fellow CNN host Chris Cuomo.  "But I don't think the Republicans are serving themselves well."  Lemon has been an outspoken critic of President Trump and members of his administration.  But CNN has long touted its ratings-challenged primetime lineup of "Anderson Cooper 360," "Cuomo Prime Time" and Lemon's "CNN Tonight" as straight-news shows despite a heavy dose of liberal opinion.  The network's website labels Lemon as an "anchor."

The Military-Intelligence Complex.  We know from a variety of disinterested watchdog institutions and foundations that the media has offered 90 percent negative coverage of the Trump Administration.  CNN in its anti-Trump zeal has ruined its brand by serial fabrications and firings of its marquee biased reporters.  An entire array of CNN journalists and analysts either has resigned, been fired, retired, forced to offer retractions, or been disgraced either for peddling ad hominem crude attacks on Trump, displaying unprofessional behavior, concocting or repeating false stories, engaging in obscene commentary, or being refuted, including but not limited at times to Reza Aslan, Carl Bernstein, Donna Brazile, James Clapper, Marshall Cohen, Candy Crowley, Kathy Griffin, Julie Joffe, Michael Hayden, Suzanne Malveaux, Manu Raju, Jim Sciutto, Julian Zelizer, and teams such as Thomas Frank, Eric Lichtblau, and Lex Harris, and Gloria Borger, Jake Tapper, and Brian Rokus.

Three Cheers for Refugee Reduction.  Over the weekend, President Donald Trump approved a new annual refugee cap of 18,000, the lowest since the U.S. program began in 1980. The reduction follows news that America took a pause last month and refused to admit any new refugees.  On economic, public safety and national security grounds, this is a very good thing for the 325 million people already in our country.  But you wouldn't know it from the grim headlines and hysterical condemnations by globalist zealots and media sympathizers.  CNN International led the open borders funeral procession last week, with a report decrying, "No refugees will be resettled in the US in October, leaving hundreds in limbo around the world."

CNN's Brian Stelter Does Incredible Investigative Work On Just How Bad the Orange Man Is.  At some point, you have to wonder whether Brian Stelter is coming up with this stuff on his own or if it's really Jeff Zucker whispering in his ear while woofing down Cheetos?  Either way, we've reached a level of ridiculousness that probably should be checked on by the middle management at CNN.  Stelter's ironically named "Reliable Sources" went out yesterday [11/3/2019] and decided to just jump every shark that was left to jump in the pursuit of orange man bad coverage.  It's gotten to the point of appearing to be parody.

WalkAway Founder Brandon Straka Confronts CNN's April Ryan: 'You're The Biggest Liar in This Room'.  In what can only be described as an epic moment at Politicon, a political convention with panelists from the left and the right, Brandon Straka of the WalkAway campaign confronted CNN's April Ryan, who was speaking on a panel called "Being Black Under Trump," and called her out for misleading people about the president with fake news.

CNN Fails To Disclose Key Facts About Andrew McCabe In Interview About DOJ Criminal Investigation.  CNN interviewed Andrew McCabe on Friday about developments in a Justice Department criminal investigation of the origins of the Trump-Russia probe, but the network failed to disclose that the former FBI deputy director is suing the Justice Department and is under criminal investigation himself.

'I used it purposefully': CNN commentator maintains GOP sit-in like 'a Klan group'.  CNN commentator Keith Boykin compared the GOP lawmakers who disrupted the impeachment proceedings to "a Klan group" and then stood by the claim after facing pushback.  Republican lawmakers not on the committees involved in the testimony of Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Laura Cooper demanded entry into the hearing but were denied Thursday [sic - Wednesday].

Sounds like baseless defamation to me.
CNN Analyst: 'No Question That Tulsi Gabbard ... is a Puppet of the Russian Government'.  On the very day Democratic presidential contender Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) said that The New York Times and CNN were smearing veterans like herself because she opposes the "regime change" war in Syria, CNN analyst Bakari Sellers told a panel of CNN reporters "there is no question that Tulsi Gabbard ... is a puppet for the Russian government."  On CNN New Day, Oct. 15 — the day of the Democratic presidential debate hosted by CNN and The New York Times — CNN contributor Bakari Sellers said, "I firmly believe that Tulsi Gabbard stands on that stage and is the antithesis to what the other 11 individuals stand for, especially when it comes to issues such as foreign policy."

CNN's Jeff Zucker:  A Ventriloquist for Dummies.  Given this week's revelations from Project Veritas, it has become obvious that the one-time-journalist Jake Tapper, apparently left his brain, pride, and any testicular fortitude behind when he left ABC for more money and facetime at CNN.  He has metamorphosed into the new Jerry Mahoney, the ventriloquist's dummy of CNN.

Trump Campaign to Sue CNN over Pro-Impeachment Bias.  In the wake of recent footage released by Project Veritas showing significant anti-Trump/pro-impeachment bias at CNN, President Trump's campaign is vowing to sue the network for "a substantial payment of damages," according to an exclusive report from Paul Bedard at the Washington Examiner. [...] f course, the media is protected by the First Amendment.  However, Trump's attorney, who represents him and his campaign, said in a letter to CNN that the network's bias violates the Lanham Act "by constituting misrepresentations to the public, to your advertisers, and to others" to distribute "truly fair and balanced" news.

Trump campaign to sue CNN over pro-impeachment bias, demands 'substantial payment'.  Outraged by secretly taped anti-Trump comments attributed to CNN President Jeff Zucker and others at the cable network, President Trump's campaign is vowing to sue the company for "a substantial payment of damages."  In a four-page letter to CNN, Zucker, and Executive Vice President David Vigilante, Trump attorney Charles J. Harder cited years of anti-Trump bias at the network and claimed the cable giant has broken its promise of "excellence in journalism."

CNN false super
CNN Falsely Claims White House 'Admits to Quid Pro Quo' with Ukraine.  CNN claimed Thursday [10/17/2019] that the White House "admits to quid pro quo with Ukraine."  That appeared to be the opposite, in fact, of what happened during a press conference with acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney.  Mulvaney told reporters that there had been no quid pro quo, as described by those pursuing his impeachment — that President Donald Trump had not withheld aid from Ukraine until it agreed to investigate his potential 2020 presidential rival, former Vice President Joe Biden.


CNN Slammed by CNN Staffers:  Jeff Zucker as Captain Ahab.  In a stunning story that James O'Keefe's Project Veritas is now releasing this week, a series of CNN president Jeff Zucker's morning staff meetings were secretly recorded — by a CNN staffer (who, for sure, has quickly been fired.)  The findings, as here, were released just as CNN prepared to co-host Tuesday's Democratic presidential debate with the New York Times. [...] After all these months and months of pushing the Trump-Russia conspiracy theory that has now crashed and burned, not to mention the Stormy Daniels business, Democrats are now all about Ukraine.  And Jeff Zucker is exactly right — everything that has been done since the president took office is designed with one goal in mind:  impeachment.

CNN Exposed as a Pure, 100 Percent Democrat Information Operation.  [Numerous video clips]  In short, CNN is not — I repeat, is not — a news network.  It doesn't practice journalism.  It doesn't reporting objective facts.  It's a corrupt, diabolical information warfare campaign aimed at destroying the American republic.

CNN didn't disclose that [a] maxed-out Warren donor asked [the] question that spurred [a] viral answer.  Sen. Elizabeth Warren's answer to a question at last week's LGBTQ Town Hall meeting went viral, when she suggested that opposition to gay marriage was the result of incel frustration.  But the questioner appears to be a maxed-out donor to Ms. Warren's campaign — a fact CNN did not disclose.  According to a report Monday in the Washington Free Beacon, questioner Morgan Cox was identified as "Chair, Human Rights Campaign Board of Directors" on the CNN chyron.  "It could have just as easily identified Cox as 'Donor, Elizabeth Warren,'" the Free Beacon wrote.

Veritas: CNN whistleblower impeaches fake news network's tattered credibility.  Ask Project Veritas.  They'll tell you that Cary Poarch is a whistleblower of a different sort.  First, he's not a secret minion of the CIA, spreading disinformation to help moribund Democrats oust the duly-elected president of the United States.  Second, his information is firsthand and recorded for posterity by a hidden camera under his control.  In fact, Poarch works as a satellite uplink technician for the Washington, D.C. bureau of fake news CNN.

CNN Tries to Get Interior Department Official Fired for Opposing Jihad Violence.  So it turns out that the acting director of the Interior Department's Bureau of Land Management, William Perry Pendley, has denied the Left's "climate change" mythology, and opposes jihad violence and illegal immigration.  CNN's Andrew Kaczynski is out for blood, trying to get Pendley for heresy, that is, for his dissent from Leftist orthodoxy.  My first reaction to this was, so what?  William Perry Pendley is in the Bureau of Land Management.  What does that have to do with "global warming," unless Kaczynski thinks that the sea levels are going to rise and swallow whole cities, including Obama's new beachfront estate, and we're all going to be dead in 12 years?  What do jihad violence and illegal immigration have to do with land management?  Kaczynski here shows that he would have been a terrific Gestapo official: [...]

CNN Just [Omitted] 540 Words to Frame Trump for [a] 'Favor' He Never Requested.  In the media's efforts to tie President Donald Trump with its latest conspiracy theory, CNN skipped an entire section of the released and unredacted transcript of a phone call to charge Trump with requesting a favor he never asked for.

CNN: Everything but the News.  For a while, we thought MSNBC had temporarily usurped CNN as the font of fake news — although both networks had tied for the most negative coverage (93 percent of all their news reports) of President Trump's first 100 days in office.  A cynic would argue that CNN had deliberately given Trump undue coverage during the Republican primary on the theory that he would be the weakest Republican in the general election and would therefore be the weakest challenger to Hillary Clinton.  CNN president Jeffrey Zucker at one point had bragged that in the primaries, Trump made CNN money.  Only later, after Trump's nomination, did Zucker regret giving so much airtime to Trump and his boisterous rallies. [...] So CNN's Zucker gave copious coverage to Apprentice-star Trump both to win ratings and to ensure the nomination of a candidate who was polling anemically against Hillary Clinton — with the intention of then reversing course and destroying Trump in the general election.

The media has officially lost its mind.  [Scroll down]  Just a few days earlier, CNN issued a report on the circumstances around an American spy being taken out of Russia that was so wrong, the Times felt moved to contradict it:  The decision to extract the spy was made while Obama was president, the Times reported, yet CNN blamed Trump for endangering the agent and forcing his extraction.  This isn't just a story of media bias.  It's a story of utter [unbelievable] obliviousness by the media.  CNN doesn't bother putting a fig leaf on anything anymore:  A glance at CNN's homepage on any given day is like looking at an assortment of Democratic Party press releases.  Any news that might be happening that can't be weaponized against Trump is of little interest.  Any news that might make Trump or anyone on the right look bad is eagerly pushed through, ordinary standards of fairness and checking [notwithstanding].

6 Reasons CNN Hired Disgraced Former FBI Official Andrew McCabe.  [Reason #2] CNN Loves to Mislead Viewers:  CNN is dedicated to misleading its minuscule audience.  The network behind the biggest media hoaxes of the last six years...
  •   Hispanic George Zimmerman: The White Racist Killer
  •   Hands Up, Don't Shoot
  •   Trump Can't Win
  •   Brett Kavanaugh: Serial Rapist
  •   The KKKids from KKKovington High School
  •   Trump Colluded with Russia
...has a reputation to maintain, and who better to keep up appearances than a man fired by the FBI for lying to the FBI?  And if McCabe is willing to accept the legal risks that come with lying to the FBI, imagine all the lies he will be willing to tell on behalf of CNN when there is no legal risk whatsoever.

CNN Tries to Blame Trump for the Obama Administration's Leaks.  Here's some advice for the media covering President Trump:  If you don't want to be accused of reporting fake news, don't report fake news.  Case in point:  On Monday [9/9/2019], CNN correspondent Jim Sciutto reported that a highly-placed U.S. intelligence source inside the Kremlin was pulled "in part, by concerns that President Donald Trump and his administration repeatedly mishandled classified intelligence and could contribute to exposing the covert source as a spy." [...] Sorry, the decision to extract the source was first made before Trump took office, and the reason was mishandling of classified intelligence not by Trump, but by the Obama administration.

Fake News, Fake Polls — CNN Edition.  Who knew pushing fake news could be so challenging?  First, they tried to turn President Trump into a rube for suggesting that Alabama could be in the path of Hurricane Dorian.  It turns out that CNN suggested the same thing, a few days before Trump did, warning Alabama to "be on the lookout".  Then came the fiction that Trump outed a Russian informant.  Instead the reality was that the decision on any outing or exfiltration occurred before Trump became president.  We know whose watch this occurred on, but CNN chose to instead blame the current president.

On Anniversary of 9-11, CNN Says 'Right-Wingers Are America's Deadliest Terrorists'.  CNN is the enemy of the American people.  On the anniversary of 9-11 attacks where Islamic terrorists hijacked airplanes and flew them into the Twin Towers, the Pentagon and into a field in Pennsylvania killing nearly 3,000 Americans, CNN is attacking 'right wingers.'  This is disgusting.  As CNN was spewing anti-American propaganda, the chyron read, "America's 9/11 Amnesia."  "The striking similarities between the KKK and Islamist jihadis," CNN said.

An even mixture of sensationalism, dishonesty, and incompetence:
CNN's big 'mistakes' all run in one direction: anti-Trump.  CNN blared an "exclusive" headline Monday [9/9/2019] with a story purporting that US intelligence made the decision to "extract" a spy that it had working within the Russian government because officials believed his cover may have been compromised by President Trump having "repeatedly mishandled classified intelligence."  That dispatch from Jim Sciutto, CNN's "chief national security correspondent," would have certainly been a smash if it weren't for vehement denials by the administration and subsequent reporting that contradicted the crux of the story — that it had been Trump who screwed up the intelligence operation.  During a White House press briefing on Tuesday, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo called CNN's reporting "materially inaccurate."

Fake news CNN introduces a Kremlin "asset". Is it Clinton, Obama or both?  Reported as yet another bombshell, Fake-news CNN claims a Kremlin spy working for America was extracted from Russia because President Trump's mishandling of classified information threatened to expose the Kremlin infiltrator, endangering his life. [...] There is just one problem with the story.  It contains one glaring lie.

Obama, Not Trump, Outed Russian Spy.  President Trump did not cause the Central Intelligence Agency to withdraw a top-level spy from Russia.  Obama did.  And so did indiscreet intelligence officials.  CNN's report to the contrary is false, as usual.  CNN has a track record of fake news, including false and biased reporting that elevates white supremacists.  On Monday [9/9/2019], CNN bragged of an "exclusive" report that "the United States successfully extracted from Russia one of its highest-level covert sources inside the Russian government" partly because "President Donald Trump and his administration repeatedly mishandled classified intelligence and could contribute to exposing the covert source as a spy."  In fact, however, officials "mishandled intelligence" and tried to extricate this source in 2016, before Trump even won the presidential election.

What Is The Point of CNN?  [Scroll down]  Brian Stelter, who hosts a show called Reliable Sources, recently nodded along as his guest, former Duke University chair of psychiatry Allen Francis, argued that Trump "may be responsible for many more million deaths" than genocidal dictators Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, and Mao Zedong.  It wasn't the first time Trump has been compared to Hitler on the network.  CNN host Don Lemon did it in July, which could explain why the New York Times has reportedly banned reporters from appearing on Lemon's show.  In addition to interviewing Michael Avenatti dozens of times on his show, Lemon hosted the disgraced lawyer at a party in the Hamptons.

CNN's Jake Tapper Gets Really Upset Over It, But His Denials About James Clapper and the Steele Dossier Don't Add Up.  For years now, there's been a primary suspicion that CNN and Jake Tapper (who led the reporting on it) were tipped off about the Steele Dossier and a briefing to Donald Trump on it by James Clapper, who was still technically part of the Obama Administration at the time.  This all went down in January of 2017, when Tapper suddenly started reporting on details of the dossier and how the newly elected President had been told about it.  The CNN newsman would later express his anger that Buzzfeed published the dossier, which showed it to be a farce in short order.  Though he claims his objections were based on the unverified nature of the dossier, that doesn't make sense.  Why would CNN not want to the entire dossier published but at the same time be leaking parts of it if they felt it wasn't proper to publish?  The more obvious explanation is that CNN and Tapper really wanted to keep leaking damaging details of the dossier without its ridiculous nature being exposed.

CNN falsely pushes claims that [the] 'climate crisis is making hurricanes more dangerous'.  CNN's fall from a purveyor of news to pure propaganda organ of the Left was vividly displayed yesterday.  An anchor named Ana Cabrera accused an expert of "sidestepping" the purported issue of global warming making hurricanes more dangerous.  She didn't interview the guest herself, but rather commented on a previous interview done by her colleague in which the other CNN anchor tried to bait guest Peter Gaynor, acting FEMA director, into blaming global warming:  ["]Researchers say that we're going to see even more very intense hurricanes due to the climate crisis.  Do you agree with that?["]  Gaynor refused to agree.

The Editor says...
Name the "researchers" (plural) who say hurricanes will intensify because of the "climate crisis."  Sounds like propaganda to me.  More specifically, it sounds like she's an activist (not a journalist) who is quoting someone who doesn't even exist.

Lawfare Expects McCabe Arrest — That Explains Why CNN Hired Him.  [Scroll down]  Knowing the DOJ was likely to indict McCabe, CNN could help frame a narrative that serves both their interests.  That narrative was already in the New York Times article describing the potential for the indictment.  When McCabe is charged the media narrative will be it's because he took the job with CNN... Trump/Barr weaponizing the DOJ and trying to kill free speech etc.  CNN doesn't have to defend their action in hiring a known liar, they'll instead frame McCabe as a victim, a fellow traveler to the larger cause of justice — whose indictment is evidence of how far Trump and Barr will go to destroy their enemies etc.

Warm CNN and MSNBC newsrooms comfort fallen spies in from the cold.  CNN announces it has hired disgraced former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe as a "contributor."  You may recall that McCabe was fired after the FBI learned he was leaking to the press and had lied to — you guessed it — FBI investigators hunting down government leakers.  While many a Trump associate cools his heals in the federal poky for "lying to the FBI," lying McCabe is free to join the ever-growing number of anti-Trump Deep State operatives enriching themselves at the mainstream media's trough.

Political Forecast:  Stormy Weather Ahead.  All who can read discard the Russian collusion claims.  What remains of them is the long-delayed Horowitz report and anticipated prosecutions for the coup plotters.  For those still wanting to be deluded there's CNN, which has hired a major plotter, former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, as a contributor to continue the Let's Pretend narrative.

Our Tawdry, Untrustworthy Fourth Estate.  The ongoing affair between the nation's top law enforcement agency and the news media resulted in another hookup last week when CNN announced the hiring of Andrew McCabe, the former deputy director of the FBI.  McCabe, a vocal Trump foe who opened a criminal investigation into the sitting president of the United States in May 2017 during his short stint as acting director, was fired by the FBI last year for lying to federal investigators.  He played a key role in concocting the Trump-Russia collusion hoax; wrote a book filled with animus toward the president; and remains under a grand jury investigation.  Last week, McCabe's lawyers met with federal prosecutors who are deciding whether to indict him for perjury.  So, of course, CNN hired him last week.

Andrew McCabe's Unjust Deserts.  As I have noticed before in this space, Andrew McCabe was a central player in the pseudo-investigation of Hillary Clinton's misuse of classified information and self-enrichment schemes while secretary of state.  He was one of the people who made sure that the probe went nowhere.  McCabe was also a central figure in the get-Mike-Flynn operation and, later, the Great Trump Hunt that occupied Andrew Weissmann's Howdy Doody dummy Robert Mueller for some two years.  McCabe leaked information about an investigation to a Wall Street Journal reporter and lied about leaking in casual conversations with superiors as well as under oath.  Yet he will soon be reporting for duty at CNN.

CNN Actually Does Need to Make Brian Stelter Apologize or Discipline Him for This.  For a show host who covers "Reliable Sources," Brian Stelter went a bridge too far on Sunday and CNN either needs to make him apologize or needs to discipline him.  This is too much for a network that prides itself in being fair and objective.  First, Stelter decided it was appropriate and relevant to bring on people to discuss, as experts, the President's mental state even though they have never diagnosed the President.  Then, when one psychiatrist disagreed it was relevant and then insisted President Trump had perhaps killed more people than Hitler, Stalin, and Mao, Stelter only interrupted the man to insist talking about the President's sanity was appropriate.

Allen Frances is crazy, which is ironic since he's CNN's contributing psychiatrist.  If you hear someone say President Trump (or any other American, for that matter) could be responsible for "many more million deaths" than Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, and Mao Zedong, you'd probably think they were crazy.  It's not just demonstrably false.  It's so far beyond left field that he's actually left the stadium of sanity.  But that's CNN contributor Dr. Allen Frances.  This world renowned psychiatrist is clearly suffering from the epidemic of Trump Derangement Syndrome, and so far there's no known cure that can bring people back from reality other than massive exposure to the truth.

CNN's Brian Stelter Lets Psychiatrist Claim Trump Worse Than Hitler, Mao, Stalin.  CNN's Brian Stelter allowed psychiatrist Allen Frances to make wildly false claims about President Donald Trump on his Sunday show and offered zero pushback to any of Frances' remarks which sparked intense backlash against the far-left network.

Crazy News Network bores us with worse than Hitler tripe.  Brian Stelter had a psychiatrist on his show to say President Donald John Trump is worse than Hitler.  Instead the man said the president was worse than Hitler, Mao and Stalin combined.  For this Stelter apologized after people pointed out the president has not killed 100 million people.  Stelter tweeted, "I agree that I should have interrupted after that line.  I wish I had heard him say it, but I was distracted by tech difficulties (that's why the show open didn't look the way it normally does, I had two computers at the table, etc). Not hearing the comment is my fault."  Apparently CNN is about as well equipped as a UHF station in the 1970s.

The opposite of journalism:  CNN is encouraging government officials to lie.  Last week, CNN announced that it is hiring Andrew McCabe, the former deputy director of the FBI.  According to the FBI inspector general, McCabe lied repeatedly to investigators, including FBI Director James Comey.  Some of the lies were under oath.  McCabe's lies were designed to cover up "misconduct" on his part:  He had violated FBI policy by leaking information about an investigation into the Clinton Foundation to the Wall Street Journal during the 2016 election.  The leak was "designed to advance his personal interest at the expense of department leadership," the IG reported.  Naturally, McCabe also lied to the public immediately after his firing, claiming it had been some form of political retaliation.  That

15 former spooks who work at CNN and MSNBC now.  CNN added to its deep roster of former FBI and CIA officials-turned-analysts Friday [8/23/2019] with the hiring of Andrew McCabe, the former FBI deputy director fired for lack of candor during an investigation last year.  McCabe is the tenth ex-FBI, CIA or intelligence community official CNN has hired during the Trump administration, according to a Daily Caller News Foundation analysis.  MSNBC has followed closely behind, having hired five former officials, including former CIA Director John Brennan.  CNN was widely mocked on Friday after announcing the McCabe hiring, largely because the network has criticized its competitors for hiring former Trump administration officials.

CNN Just Paid Off Another Corrupt Deep State Leaker With A TV Contract.  CNN announced Thursday [8/22/2019] it has hired former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe as a contributor after the network criticized other networks for hiring former Trump White House press secretaries Sean Spicer and Sarah Sanders.

CNN Hires Fired FBI Perjurer Andrew McCabe, The Twitterverse Is Not Amused.  Yesterday CNN blasted Fox News for hiring Sarah Huckabee Sanders.  Today [8/23/2019] CNN announced it had hired disgraced former FBI official Andrew McCabe despite the fact he perjured himself before Congress and was fired for cause from the Bureau.  Do I smell mendacity?

CNN complains about the rehabilitation of known liars, then hires Andrew McCabe.  CNN has added disgraced former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe to its already-bloated roster of contributors drawn from the intelligence community.  The announcement comes not even a week after CNN dedicated significant airtime to protesting that former White House press secretaries Sean Spicer and Sarah Huckabee Sanders are allowed to seek professional employment.  The McCabe hire was reported Friday morning [8/23/2019] on social media by CNN media reporter Oliver Darcy.

Gutfeld on Cuomo's Trump aging conspiracy.  Once the face of hard news, CNN is now the butt of America's jokes.  The latest oddity?  Chris Cuomo conspires over President Trump's appearance.  Yep.  He looks exactly the same as when he became president, and that can't be good. [...] Only on the Clown News Network can an anchor wonder if the president is "augmenting his physical reality."

Illegal Alien Caught Lying About ICE Separating Her From Breastfeeding Baby After CNN Pushed Her Fake Story.  It isn't an accident that CNN is considered fake news by most Americans.  The low-ratings network that can be seen playing in every major airport, has a long history of distorting the truth to fit their far-left liberal narrative.  When it comes to protecting and defending the flow of illegal aliens across our southern border, there isn't a lie that's too big for the leftist media.  Last week, CNN reported about an undocumented migrant mom (illegal alien) who was swept up in the Mississippi I.C.E. raids.  It's strange, that CNN never mentioned that the "migrant mom" was using a fake social security number.

CNN steers softball interview carefully to give violent Antifa a new voice.  Leave it to CNN to give voice to violent Antifa thugs in the wake of Saturday's clash with right-wing protesters. [...] CNN reporter Sara Sidner interviewed two masked members of the left-wing mob, who identified themselves as members of the Youth Liberation Front.  The riot helmet one of them is wearing features the communist hammer and sickle, which speaks volumes on the ideology they speak of.  The reporter sets the tone by noting that Antifa is "standing up against these far right groups," before tip-toeing around just how violent the group is.

The 3 Types Of 'Journalists' Who Destroyed Media Credibility.  As the news media completes its credibility death spiral and transitions from objective reporting to subjective editorializing, it's worth looking at the various types of "journalists" who enabled the descent. [...] And it's not just a CNN problem.  Yes, CNN is the most glaring and easy to pick on because they're so wildly over-the-top with their partisanship, dishonesty and bias.  But it's a problem that plagues virtually the entire media institution.  They have all transitioned from being credible, impartial, unbiased, straight news mediums — to almost entirely subjective and opinion-based propagandists who spend 2% of the time reporting actual facts, and the remaining 98% framing and characterizing those facts to fit their partisan narratives/agendas.

Trump Green Card Rule:  Three Lefty Lies Debunked.  All too typical of the nonsense that has been said and written about the regulation is the following headline from CNN:   "Cuccinelli rewrites Statue of Liberty poem to make case for limiting immigration."  This ridiculous claim distorts an answer the acting director made during an interview with Rachel Martin at NPR.  Martin asked him, "Would you also agree that Emma Lazarus' words etched on the Statue of Liberty — 'Give me your tired, your poor ... ' — are also part of the American ethos?" [...] Cuccinelli's mistake involved his assumption that Martin and her fellow "journalists" were literate enough in American history to get his point.  It went straight over their heads, of course.  The Lazarus sonnet was written in 1883 for the purpose of raising money for the pedestal upon which the Statue of Liberty stands, but it didn't reflect U.S. immigration law then or now.  The Immigration Act of 1882 was the first comprehensive immigration statute enacted by Congress, and it excluded anyone "unable to take care of him or herself without becoming a public charge."

CNN super
CNN's Most Insane Chyron Yet?  The people who work at CNN want you to fear and hate your family, friends, and neighbors who support President Trump.  And in any given hour of their programming I can show you no less than 50 examples of dishonest, unfair and inflammatory fake news being broadcast from their traphouse studios.  But here's just one example from this morning that's particularly galling in its desperate overreach, all predicated on efforts to create hatred and division in America.  The people at CNN are literally trying to convince their audiences that mental health actually has nothing to do with mass shootings.


CNN Claims Trump 'Rolled Back' Obama Rule To Keep Guns Away From The 'Mentally Ill.' Nope.  On Monday [8/5/2019], CNN seemingly attempted to paint President Donald Trump as culpable for tragic mass shootings over the weekend in El Paso, Texas and Dayton, Ohio.  Anchors Poppy Harlow and John Avlon claimed on-air that the president eliminated a proposed Obama-era regulation that would keep firearms out of the hands of the "mentally ill."  The proposed rule, however, was seriously broad, undermining the Second and Fourth Amendment rights of tens of thousands of Americans in constitutionally dubious fashion.  The restrictions were based merely upon the fact that those on the list had received assistance in managing their Social Security disability payments.  Even the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which has become increasingly partisan over the years, vehemently opposed the regulation.

CNN Contributor:  Confronting Trump's Base Is 'Confronting White Nationalism'.  CNN continued bashing President Trump for his rhetoric against the Squad on Tuesday [7/23/2019].  CNN Right Now invited Wajahat Ali, a New York Times columnist and CNN contributor, on to speak about Trump's comments.  Ali criticized the President and his supporters for contributing to a "pattern" of what he considers "white nationalism."  He then spouted out a number of falsehoods to back up this claim.  The columnist accused Trump of calling Mexicans rapists, a lie that even Politifact gave a false rating to during the 2016 election.  He also falsely stated that there was a "Muslim ban," but the Trump administration has never implemented a ban on Muslims entering the country.

Unfit To Print Episode 17: Pro-Trump Women Punch Back At CNN's Biased Questions.  CNN tried to bait a group of Republican women into calling President Donald Trump racist, but it backfired when the women fought back.  The video of these women calling out CNN's Randi Kaye for her biased questioning is an all-time classic, [...]

CNN's Bakari Sellers:  Trump Administration Is 'Literally Terrorizing People' With ICE Raids.  Former Florida gubernatorial candidate Andrew Gillum argued Sunday [7/14/2019] that the Trump administration is "literally terrorizing people" by going through with planned ICE raids on illegal immigrants under deportation orders.  During a panel segment of "State of the Union" with Jake Tapper, Gillum called the raids a "strategy" designed to "demonize black and brown people" in order to secure a second term in the White House.

'So Dishonest': Vice President Pence Blasts CNN After Visiting Migrant Shelters.  Vice President Mike Pence visited migrant shelters in the McAllen, Texas, area Friday and blasted CNN on Twitter following the stops, particularly for its "dishonest" coverage of his trip.  "CNN is so dishonest," the vice president tweeted late Friday [7/12/2019].  "Today we took reporters to a detention facility on the border for families and children and all told us they were being treated well."

CNN mired in a credibility crisis as ratings continue to collapse, experts say.  CNN's audience shriveled in the second quarter of 2019, averaging only 541,000 total viewers, less than half Fox News Channel's 1.3 million average.  But CNN struggled even more during the primetime hours of 8-11 p.m. ET, finishing as the fifteenth most-watched network on basic cable behind networks such as TLC, Investigation Discovery and the Hallmark Channel.  CNN averaged a dismal 761,000 primetime viewers while FNC averaged 2.4 million.

CNN Death Spiral Continues with Double Digit Q2 Ratings Collapse.  The far-left fake news outlet CNN came in 15th place in primetime during the previous quarter and lost nearly 20 percent of its already pathetic viewership.

CNN Ratings Tank.  I've been writing over the last few days about the fact that "get woke, go broke" doesn't always apply to companies that pose as social justice warriors.  On the other hand, CNN's formula — obsessive, over the top Trump hatred, every day, all the time — has bombed.

CNN's Credibility Crisis.  President Trump in April mocked CNN (yet again), tweeting out a report that the cable news network had registered its lowest viewership ratings of 2019. [...] Now, two months later, the news just keeps getting worse for the far-left network.  According to recent reports from several credible sites, including The Hill and Forbes, CNN has suffered a 16 percent primetime ratings collapse.  This is what happens when you put all your eggs in one Mueller shaped basket.

Don Lemon And CNN Can't Stop The Trump/Hitler Comparisons.  In a discussion with Chris Cuomo on CNN, Don Lemon once again made a Trump/Hitler comparison.  [Video clip] [...] This was shortly after CNN cut away from the Trump rally when the President attacked the media and the crowd started chanting "CNN s****".

Acosta Is His Own Worst 'Enemy'.  [Jim] Acosta is pitching a book called "The Enemy of the People" and he wants you to think he is "the people."  He isn't.  Is he "The Enemy of the People"?  That's giving him too much credit, but he is the enemy of the truth.

Fusion GPS Best Bud At CNN Runs Interference For Bogus Steele Dossier.  After President Trump commented on the idea of receiving "foreign dirt" on an opponent on Thursday, cable news pundits fully dedicated themselves to moving the goal posts for what constitutes colluding with a foreign adversary.  On "At This Hour With Kate Bolduan," CNN reporter Evan Perez simultaneously downplayed the significance of the Steele dossier and failed to explain which 2016 campaign had actually paid a foreign adversary for opposition research (spoiler: it was the Hillary Clinton campaign).  Perez seemed to conclude that Trump's hypothetical comments are much worse than the actual effect the Steele dossier had on the 2016 election because the dossier was written by someone connected to U.S. ally Great Britain, and because it was obtained by the FBI.

Don Lemon Tries to Convince Viewers CNN is Not Biased, Does Not Hate Trump.  Don Lemon has begun a campaign to convince viewers CNN does not hate Trump, love the Democrats or engage in biased reporting.  Earlier this month, speaking at the Financial Time Future of News event, Lemon said flatly the network is "not liberal," which set off a storm of reaction from conservatives in the media.

Don Lemon and Jim Acosta assert CNN is not an anti-Trump outlet.  CNN White House reporter Jim Acosta and host Don Lemon said the network is not an anti-President Trump outlet, they are simply "holding their feet to the fire" because they will ask the hard questions to anyone who is in power.

CNN Is Really Upset That Scot Peterson Got Arrested Over His Cowardice.  You can always count on CNN to be on the wrong side of every issue and their response to Scot Peterson being arrested for his cowardice (among other things) during the Parkland shooting is no exception.  While there are questions about whether Peterson has legal liability, there's no doubt he was a primary factor in so many children being killed that day.  He sat idly by as a gunman walked around the school shooting people when it was his job to respond with force.  To give you an idea of CNN's bias on this issue, Chris Cillizza once notably quipped on Twitter that a "good guy with a gun doesn't always stop a bad guy."  This echoed CNN's softball treatment of Sheriff Scott Israel at a town hall where they instead savaged Dana Loesch, who had nothing to do with the shooting.

CNN Tries Turning Trump "Special Day of Prayer" Into "White Evangelical" Day.  Today [6/2/2019] is the day devoted Evangelist Franklin Graham, son of Billy Graham, has called a "Special Day of Prayer" to protect President Donald Trump from his "enemies".  While Franklin Graham is revered by millions of Christians world wide as an inspiring Evangelist, just as his father was before him, according to CNN Religion Editor Daniel Burke, he's a "White Evangelical".  Because Evangelists come in all colors and all races, calling Franklin Graham a "White Evangelical" is racist.  The word "evangelical', incidentally is an adjective rather than a noun.

Exposing the RINO Underground By Smoking Out the 'Never Trumpers' One-by-One.  Honestly — really, honestly — who ever heard of Ana Navarro before she became a CNN "expert Republican" on what is wrong with Trump and with the entire Republican political agenda? [...] Between those rare glimpses of Navarro, and occasional snippets of that Thing that get aired on Hannity or Laura when that vile object is shown obnoxiously filing her nails during a "debate," I have figured this out:
  [#1]   She claims to be a Republican.
  [#2]   She takes the Democrat Left side on virtually every single issue that gets discussed, no matter how little it has to do with anything Trump.
  [#3]   She was an advisor to John McCain.
  [#4]   She was an even higher-up advisor in Florida to Jeb!  Bush.

CNN Blatantly Lies to Protect Far-Left Abortionists.  A left wing conspiracy theory news channel Friday [5/31/2019] made blatantly false claims in order to make the abortionists on the far-left seem less radical.  "Vice President Mike Pence suggested Thursday that abortion rights activists support 'infanticide,' echoing false claims made last month by President Donald Trump about doctors killing babies that have already been born," said CNN.  But there are two obvious problems with CNN's analysis.  The first is that Trump never said that.

CNN's Cooper Complains About FB After They Won't Remove Funny Pelosi Parody Video.  CNN wants to monopolize information.  They tried and failed to swing the 2016 election; it was because they had competition.  CNN and NBC are the biggest sources of completely fake news.  Eighty million people tuned in to CNN to watch a wholly rigged presidential debate.  The FCC should have pulled their license to broadcast.  NBC tried to incite a race riot in Sanford, FL with their doctored 911 tape:  ["He's black' SPLICE "he's up to no good"].  They tried to make the police dispatcher seem involved in the phony racist talk.  And that's the way they presented it.  And when they found out the shooter wasn't "white" like they had assumed, they called him a "White Hispanic" No one was prosecuted.  NBC just said, "my bad" then went on spewing fake news.  Seriously, America needs to shut these phony news organizations down — permanently.

Impeach or get off the pot, Democrats.  When House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler and Speaker Nancy Pelosi claimed that the United States had been plunged into a "constitutional crisis," a large swath of the media took to plying this fantasy for them.  "Ever wonder what a constitutional crisis looks like?  Well, open your eyes," CNN's Don Lemon explained to his viewers.  "The president of the United States is just blowing right through our system of checks and balances, the very thing that is supposed to keep our Congress, the judiciary, and the executive branch working, which means our country working."  None of this is remotely true.  Our checks and balances are working exactly as they should.

CNN Lays Off Almost Entire Division, Surprises Employees As 'Crazy Rumor' Comes True.  CNN laid off almost all of its health care coverage division Tuesday [5/21/2019], in a move the network called a "crazy rumor" less than three weeks ago.  While Dr. Sanjay Gupta is expected to keep his job, most of the rest of the division, based out of Atlanta, were released.

CNN Completely Edits African American Pro-Lifer Out Of Abortion Documentary.  Last October, Bell produced a show about abortion and the CNN documentary crew tapped Students for Life of America (SFLA) to provide a pro-life perspective for the episode.  The group sent their Minority Outreach Coordinator Elizabeth Parker (who is African American) to represent the organization and the unborn on camera.  Naturally Parker and her colleagues were excited to see how the interview turned out in the final cut and honored to be included in a show aimed at "exploring communities across America".  In a discussion about abortion, it goes without saying that the pro-life community is an unavoidable and vital part of the conversation — literally half of it.  When the May 19th premiere finally came around the SFLA team was disappointed to discover Parker had been cut out of the documentary altogether.  Even worse, it turned out there were no pro-life views represented at all.  CNN even cut out footage of pro-life advocates outside local abortion facilities.  Parker says she suspects their views simply didn't fit the narrative they were trying to weave.  Rather than present a two-sided story, they simply cut the side that didn't fit the script.

Our Collective Dive off the Cliff.  The burning of the Cathedral of Notre Dame — in the heart of Paris, in the heart of France, in the heart of Europe, in the heart of Christendom and Western civilization — was an absolute cultural catastrophe. [...] Over at CNN, Frida Ghitis penned a heartwarming, sincere panegyric, but one in which she cannot help but refer to Notre Dame as "a building, technically a religious structure."  Technically a religious structure?  I wonder what tipped Ghitis off.  The giant crucifix bestriding the altar?  The religious imagery that adorns literally every surface of the place?  The masses of people who gather there daily to pray?  What facet of the building does Ghitis consider technically a non-religious structure?

Continuing plunge of CNN, MSNBC ratings reveals that fake news is a bad business strategy.  The catastrophic ratings decline for both CNN and MSNBC was no temporary blip following publication of the Mueller report.  Both cable news outlets had heavily promoted the hoax of Russian collusion with the Trump administration, teasing the hopes of Trump-haters for impeachment and prosecution for treason.  Now, those disappointed viewers have gone away, and continue to stay away.

CNN Goes Melodramatic To Push Gun Control Agenda After Colorado Shooting.  CNN took to not only politicizing the recent school shooting in Colorado but doing so with a melodramatic new gimmick.  Brooke Baldwin simply emoted into the camera as images flashed behind her on a screen.  First, you see Baldwin at her desk at CNN.  Then, you see the inside of a classroom where students are discussing the incident.  "I'm afraid that one day I'll go to school and I'll never come out," one grieving student sobs.  "What actions will you take to protect people like me and my classmates from this happening?"  Then we see Baldwin again, hands folded in her lap, glaring angrily at the camera.

CNN's Jim Acosta Caught Lying About Trump Again.  CNN's fake news reporter, who is really a political activist, Jim Acosta is lying again.  Acosta claimed that Trump painted asylum seekers with a broad brush, accusing them of misleading immigration authorities at the border.

CNN's Jim Acosta Misrepresents Trump Speech on Asylum Seekers.  CNN White House correspondent Jim Acosta misrepresented remarks President Donald Trump made during a Rose Garden speech selling a White House immigration plan.  Acosta tweeted during the Thursday [5/16/2019] speech that Trump had "[painted] asylum seekers with a broad brush," saying of them "these are frivolous claims."

CNN's Jim Acosta Spreads Misquote from Trump Immigration Speech.  CNN's chief White House correspondent Jim Acosta on Thursday misquoted a portion of President Donald Trump's immigration speech and was quickly met with a fact-check by a Breitbart News reporter.  Speaking in the Rose Garden, President Donald Trump unveiled immigration reform proposals aimed at increasing the quota for skilled workers.  During his remarks, the president assailed some asylum seekers' abuses of the country's immigration system. "

CNN Further Normalizes Leftist Antifa Terrorists.  It's been over three years since the FBI and the Department of Homeland security referred to the radical leftist Antifa movement's behavior as that of a "domestic terrorist" organization, but that hasn't stopped CNN from promoting their activities.  Just days after CNN host Chris Cuomo argued that Antifa was a "true" and "good cause," social justice warrior Kamau Bell on Sunday's [5/5/2019] United Shades of America offered a national platform to an Antifa member while offering no pushback against their violent tactics.  Completely ignoring the terrorist designation, Bell sat down with a young woman who only went by the name Ariel.  As they began their discussion, Bell allowed her to twist and lie about what Antifa actually was: [...]

CNN Contributor Insanely Claims Unborn Babies Aren't Even Human.  On CNN's "Primetime with Chris Cuomo" on Monday night, a segment on the legality of state-level fetal heartbeat bills quickly spiraled into a chaotic debate about whether unborn children should be considered human beings.  CNN contributor and erstwhile New York City Democratic politician Christine Quinn said, "When a woman is pregnant, that is not a human being inside of her."  When guest Rick Santorum asked CNN Host Chris Cuomo if he disagreed "that at the moment of conception that a child is human and alive?"  Cumono replied that means it's "viable."  When Santorum asked, "Is it biologically a human life?" Quinn shouted, "No!"

Closely related:
CNN cutting staff by as many as 300 jobs.  Trump hatred has been good for the [New York Times], with digital subscriptions up substantially (over $700 million in revenue last year) as the paper became the premier source of anti-Trump fulminations.  But with CNN, the story is very different.  The network that pioneered cable news long ago lost its dominant position to Fox News, and since Donald Trump became president has bet its future on the Russia Hoax, and lost.

CNN says 100 employees accepted voluntary buyouts in response to layoffs 'rumor'.  CNN says roughly 100 employees have accepted voluntary buyouts a month after an overhaul by parent company AT&T.  According to Deadline, AT&T's decision to offer buyouts, similar to those offered at HBO and the remnants of Turner, was in an effort to chip away at approximately $170 billion in outstanding debt, which AT&T agreed to take on as a result of their acquisition of Time Warner announced in 2016.  In March, AT&T restructured the majority of their TV assets under the umbrella of WarnerMedia, including CNN.

CNN is More Dangerous Than Banned Voices.  You know what CNN is.  It's the network that took the lead in promoting the false narratives that Michael Brown and others killed while violently resisting arrest were, instead, innocent victims of racist American cops.  You might remember that photo of "CNN Newsroom" hosts Sally Kohn, Mel Robbins and Margaret Hoover with their hands in the air while their co-host Sunny Hostin held up a sign saying, "I can't breathe."  The fake news about Michael Brown and others like Eric Garner who were killed while resisting lawful arrest was so widely broadcast that everyone knew exactly what the celebrity anchors meant without even seeing the so-called victims' names.  The smug and self-righteous look on their faces alone was almost enough to tell the tale.

Clintons and CNN plunging together.  Maybe it's a sign of the times.  President and Mrs. Clinton can't sell tickets and CNN can't draw an audience. [...] So what's going on?  The Clintons are worn out and have nothing to say.  It does not help that the former President is a loser in the "me-too" age.  The former First Lady can only do interviews with Rachel Maddow for fear of getting a serious question.  CNN is a victim of its own stupidity.  They became a news channel obsessed with everything anti-Trump and can't survive the Mueller report.

ObamaGate: No Misdemeanors, Only High Crimes.  Or look instead at Anderson Cooper, CNN's putative doyen, who can't even garner 0.3 percent of the population as viewers for his "flagship" program, and who recently accused Jared Kushner of "gaslighting" the nation over Russia; in other words of making statements aimed at convincing the listeners that they are insane.  This from the network that has so stoked the flames of Russia conspiracy-mongering every day for two years, that they publish outlandish pieces on Robert Mueller's sealing indictments against the president, and as Cooper's fellow show host Chris Cuomo qualifies the president's public statements as those made by a convict already wearing an "orange jumpsuit," statements that are less gaslighting than full on tinfoil-hattery.

CNN's Chris Cuomo Made 11 Misleading Statements About the Mueller Report.  The world already knows CNN's Chris Cuomo is not the brightest bulb in the chandelier.  Still, during an interview with former Attorney General Michael Mukasey on Tuesday night, Cuomo proved not only that he's eager to mislead his audience, but that he doesn't have the capacity to grasp even the fundamental bottom line of the Mueller Report and has no idea how our three separate branches of the federal government operate.  From Maggie Haberman to John Podhoertz to Bill Kristol to Mitt Romney to Chris Cuomo... Nepotism is replacing meritocracy and America is all that much stupider for it.

Trump is Popping in the Polls.  Watch most cable or network news shows and the message is clear — President Donald Trump is unpopular, especially compared to the dozens of fresh faces attempting to challenge him for the White House in 2020. Some of the faces are not so fresh as three of the leading contenders — Biden, Sanders, and Warren are septuagenarians.  Despite the exonerating Mueller report, Trump is still on the ropes, about to be impeached, a Russian agent, and so on.  Trump is also a Nazi, racist, homophobe, Islamophobe, and sexist pig.  Nobody likes him.  At least that's what CNN says.  If this was truly the case, Trump should be polling in the low 30s at best, with most of the country giving him and his administration a thumbs down on performance and results.  Yet reality is far different.

Jim Acosta doing his best to prove Trump is right about CNN as 'fake news'.  CNN has been accused repeatedly by President Trump of being "fake news."  He couldn't be more correct, given that CNN's coverage of the border crisis, which not too long ago was characterized by a drumbeat of reports debunking any crisis, is now all about reporting that yes, indeed, there is a crisis. [...] Remember the CNN drumbeat of "not a crisis" and "no emergency at the border"?  They're singing a different tune now, [...]

Jake Tapper:  CNN Didn't Get 'Anything' Wrong In Russiagate Reporting.  Jake Tapper said Sunday that CNN has not gotten "anything" wrong during the course of reporting on Russiagate, even though his network has bungled numerous stories over the past two years.  "I'm not sure what you're saying the media got wrong.  The media reported the investigation was going on.  Other than the people in the media on the left, not on this network, I don't know anybody that got anything wrong," Tapper said during an exchange with acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney.  "We didn't say there was a conspiracy.  We said Mueller was investigating a conspiracy."

Tucker Carlson exposes CNN's slavish obedience to Democrats' demands.  Last night, Tucker Carlson offered a landmark, devastating critique of CNN's descent from a legitimate news source to a propaganda adjunct of the Democratic Party.  Using CNN's own broadcasts yesterday, he proved his case that there is actual collusion between the two organizations, the Democratic Party and the pioneer cable news channel.  This is must-see TV (to appropriate a slogan invented by NBC) that almost fatally discredits a competitor that already is facing a viewership crisis, with half of its viewership melting away in the realization that they have been fed a hoax for over two years.  [Video clip]

How CNN misled its viewers.  In our hyperpartisan world, in which so many people watch only media that will give them news with which they agree, CNN viewers understandably expected the Mueller report to find overwhelming evidence that President Trump colluded, conspired with and is beholden to Russia.  After all, that is what they have been hearing for many months.  Pundit after pundit, commentator after commentator, host after host already had made up their minds:  President Trump was guilty and should be indicted, impeached or removed under the 25th Amendment.

Jeff Zucker:  No Regrets on CNN's Russia Hoax Coverage, 'We Are Not Investigators'.  CNN Worldwide president Jeff Zucker is pushing back against critics accusing the news network of being one of the chief propagators of a debunked Trump-Russia conspiracy theory after special counsel Robert Mueller cleared the president's 2016 campaign of alleged collusion with the Kremlin.  In an interview with the New York Times, Zucker said he was "entirely comfortable" with CNN's Trump-Russia coverage and suggested it was entirely appropriate to give near around-the-clock-coverage due to the story's magnitude. "

Dan Bongino:  More evidence for 'Sasquatch' than for 'half the stuff CNN puts on the air'.  Fox News contributor Dan Bongino weighed in on the pending lawsuit against CNN over its coverage of the viral confrontation between the Covington Catholic High School students and Native American elder Nathan Phillips, saying the liberal network has a serious trust issue.  The legal team of high school student Nicholas Sandmann launched the massive $275 million lawsuit against CNN, accusing the network of ignoring the facts and putting its "anti-Trump agenda first" after portraying the MAGA hat-wearing teenagers as the aggressors in the altercation.

Acosta: Trump Is Spreading 'Virus' Against the Media, Right Has Bigger Media Presence.  A day after he offered a tired assertion that it was "surreal" that he and his media colleagues were questioning the White House about President Trump's mental stability, CNN chief White House correspondent and carnival barker Jim Acosta was back on Tuesday's CNN Newsroom offering another lengthy diatribe and meltdown to the delight of his colleagues.  In four-and-a-half minutes, Acosta attacked the Daily Caller for a "softball" question to the President, bashed Trump for spreading a "virus" around the world that the media has a liberal bias, and even suggested conservatives have a bigger media and social media influence than liberals.

CNN President Calls Fox News a 'Propaganda Network'.  During his speech at South By Southwest in Austin, Texas, last week CNN president Jeff Zucker renewed his criticism of cable news rival Fox News Channel, calling the network a "propaganda network."  He also said Fox's relationship to the White House is "completely symbiotic" and detrimental to journalism.  Zucker addressed Fox News's response to the DNC's decision barring the network from hosting one of the 2020 presidential primary debates.

CNN guest connects New Zealand mosque massacre to Trump only minutes after it happened!  The hate for Trump has become vile at networks like CNN.  Last night [3/14/2019], as the news was unfolding about these mosque attacks in New Zealand, Intercept columnist Mehdi Hasan suggested that Trump was partly to blame for these kind of attacks around the world.

This is CNN? Primetime shows filled with liberal opinion, not straight news as network claims.  CNN touts its primetime lineup as being straight, just-the-facts news, but anyone tuning in to the network's evening programming can expect a heavy dose of liberal opinion, as "Anderson Cooper 360," "CNN Tonight" and "Cuomo Prime Time" don't always align with founder Ted Turner's bare bones, objective approach to journalism.  "Anderson Cooper is a mix of news and opinion, but Don Lemon and Chris Cuomo are obviously heavy on opinion and use the news as a launching pad for those opinions," Cornell University Law Professor William Jacobson told Fox News.  "There's nothing inherently wrong with that, so long as they are not mischaracterized as part of the news operation."

Study: CNN's 'The Situation Room' Is a Week-long Promo for Dem Investigations.  CNN's Wolf Blitzer has spent the past week using his evening show The Situation Room as a platform for Democratic lawmakers to plug their numerous investigations of President Trump.  Blitzer, a veteran reporter and host on the network, is not a name that immediately springs to mind when one thinks of biased or outlandish statements from CNN journalists.  However, the many interviews he has conducted with politicians on the Hill — a staple of his show — tell a story of bias through careful and deliberate framing of facts.

People Who Watch CNN are Less Likely to Believe Trump is Telling the Truth on Russia.  CNN viewers are far less likely to believe that President Donald Trump is being honest about the Russia investigation than people who watch MSNBC or Fox News, according to a new NBC News and Wall Street Journal poll.  The February 2019 poll found that just 37 percent of people agree that the president has been truthful about the special counsel's investigation into Russian interference, while 58 percent disagree that he has been truthful.  Opinions regarding Trump's honesty, however, are even more divided among people based on which cable news channel they primarily watch.

CNN's Vinograd:  Trump's CPAC Speech Had Moment That Sounded Like Hitler.  On Saturday's "CNN Newsroom," CNN National Security Analyst Sam Vinograd stated that during President Trump's CPAC speech, he sounded "a lot like" Adolf Hitler, and that he also made statements "that really looked like Vladimir Putin scripted his speech."

CNN's Acosta Caught Lying During Tantrum at Hanoi Press Conference.  CNN's Jim Acosta lied during an on-air tantrum after President Trump did not call on him at a press conference in Hanoi, reports NewsBusters.  After ending his summit without a deal with North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un, Trump addressed the world media and took a number of questions.  He did not, however, call on Jim Acosta, the anti-Trump activist at the far-left CNN.  At the end of the press conference, CNN brought Acosta on air to recap the event.  Naturally, the crybully opened by making everything all about himself and immediately started lying.

CNN Spins Its Role in Jussie Smollett Hoax.  CNN is in the business of spin.  Yet it is not doing a good job of spinning its own role in the imploded Jussie Smollett hate hoax.  CNN propagandist Brooke Baldwin, personifying the leftist "mainstream" media just as Jussie Smollett personifies black victimhood, sneered, "This is America in 2019" while hyping the hoax, even though Smollett's story was conspicuously fake from the beginning.

Did someone mention Jussie Smollett?

Look What CNN Is Outraged Over Now.  The media are outraged over the silly, like how President Trump gets two scoops of ice cream or doesn't have a pet dog in the White House.  They are also incensed over what they believe is serious, that Trump colluded with Putin to steal the election from Hillary Clinton, despite there being not one iota of evidence supporting their belief.  It's much like believing that Elvis and Bigfoot are regularly splashing around with the Loch Ness Monster.  There is plenty the media could be outraged about but are not.  Where is the outrage over the Obama administration spying on its political opponent's presidential campaign, then, when caught, using unverified opposition research to obtain a FISA warrant to cover its misdeeds?  Followed by finagling a special counsel appointment to put the blanket of investigational secrecy over its illegal and treasonous activities?  No outrage.

CNN Mocks Trump for Eating Omelet During Border Emergency.  To prove that there's a border emergency, President Trump must stop eating omelets!  Ridiculous, you might say.  And yet, on this morning's [2/18/2019] New Day, CNN's John Avlon, Alisyn Camerota and Jeff Toobin mocked President Trump for eating an omelet, somehow suggesting it debunks the existence of an emergency.

Autopsy of a Dead Coup.  [Scroll down]  So-called "bombshell," "watershed," "turning-point," and "walls closing in" fake news aired in 24-hour news bulletin cycles.  The media went from fabrications about Trump's supposed removal of the bust of Martin Luther King, Jr. from the Oval Office, to the mythologies in the Steele dossier, to lies about the Trump Tower meeting, to assurances that Michael Cohen would testify to Trump's suborning perjury, and on and on.  CNN soon proved that it is no longer a news organization at all — as reporters like Gloria Borger, Chris Cuomo, Eric Lichtblau, Manu Raju, Brian Rokus, Jake Tapper, Jeff Zeleny, and teams such as Jim Sciutto, Carl Bernstein, and Marshall Cohen as well as Thomas Frank, Eric Lichtblau, and Lex Harris all trafficked in false rumors and unproven gossip detrimental to Trump, while hosts and guest hosts such as Reza Aslan, the late Anthony Bourdain, and Anderson Cooper stooped to obscenity and grossness to attack Trump.

High-powered Dem Andre Fladell:  What's hurting the country the most is dysfunctional and disgusting CNN.  Palm Beach County Democrat and political powerbroker Andre Fladell is as angry at CNN's fake news as Donald J. Trump.  And, it sounds a little different when it's coming from one of the most powerful Democrats in the Sunshine State.  "What's hurting the country the most, in my opinion, is the dysfunctional and disgusting reporting of a cable channel called CNN," Fladell said during a meeting earlier this month of the United South County Democrats.

The Biggest Threat To Press Freedom Is The Media Itself.  In December 2017, CNN reported that Donald Trump Jr. received an email giving him the hacked Democratic National Committee emails released by WikiLeaks before they were public.  MSNBC and CBS "independently" confirmed the story.  It was later revealed that the date on the email was wrong, and Donald Trump Jr. didn't get the emails before they were public.  CNN eventually revealed they never saw the original email, and based on the very lawyerly and suspect denials issued, it appears that the anonymous sources who gave CNN the story, as well as confirming it to MSNBC and CBS, were Democratic partisans from the House intel committee.  CNN did not discipline the reporters who botched the story.  There was no formal retraction.  Instead, CNN rewrote the story so it was an inane recounting of how Donald Trump Jr. got an email about a big news event.

Watch CNN try to rationalize away their own instant poll showing 76% of viewers positive on Trump's SOTU.  I don't think the suits at CNN anticipated either the quality of State of the Union speech that President Trump delivered or the positive public reaction to it when they went to the expense and trouble of an instant poll.  The segment they broadcast on it is a classic of rationalization, attempting to minimize the outcome that went so contrary to their own prejudices.  A stunning 59% were very positive, with another 17% somewhat positive, for a grand total of 76% — a landslide in anyone's book.

CNN State of the Union Promo: 'President Trump in Nancy Pelosi's House'.  CNN promoted its coverage of Tuesday's State of the Union address by describing it as "President Trump in Nancy Pelosi's house."  The language gave it the appearance of a sporting event rather than a solemn address by the president of the United States before a joint session of Congress.  The promo also appeared to be playing up the rivalry between the two political leaders now that Pelosi's Democrats have taken the House majority.  While the State of the Union address is given in the House Chamber and Pelosi (D., Calif.) is the speaker, the House of Representatives is more frequently referred to as the "People's House."

CNN Chyron Labels Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam a Republican.  CNN aired a chyron Friday evening [2/1/2019] labeling Virginia Democrat Gov. Ralph Northam a Republican during a report on the Virginia Democrat apologizing for a racist medical school yearbook photo depicting two men — one of them himself — in blackface and Ku Klux Klan garb.  The chyron aired at 9:00 p.m.  EST during a CNN broadcast of Anderson Cooper 360, which showed a video of Northam addressing the inflammatory yearbook photo in a video posted to his Twitter account.

Embattled Virginia Governor Ralph Northam Abruptly Changes Political Affiliation.  Ordinarily you'd think this was an accident but then you have to ask yourself:  how is this accident even possible?  Why is it that all these mistakes CNN makes run in exactly one direction?  When was the last time a damaging but false story was spread about any Democrat by CNN?  When was the last time they made a blunder on their chyrons when it hurt a Democrat?

This Is CNN: Network Labeled Dem VA Governor Embroiled In Racist Yearbook Fiasco Was A Republican.  It didn't take long for the news media to hit another iceberg.  This time it was in the Old Dominion.  Virginia became the subject of media attention (okay, some media attention) since Democrats tried to push a bill that would've permitted abortions up until the moment of birth.  It was a ghastly bill that was rejected.  Still, Democratic Gov. Ralph Northam, a medical doctor, decided to weigh in during a radio interview this week, where he was torched for his remarks that pretty much detailed how this bill would permit the murder of babies.  The Democrats' abortion extremism was on full display.  He responded to the blowback by saying he doesn't regret his remarks about the legislation.

Roger Stone's lawyer offers proof CNN is in bed with FBI.  Documentation was released yesterday [2/4/2019], reportedly from Roger Stone's lawyer, that claims that CNN didn't just happen upon Mr. Stone's home right before a 29-person FBI team raided it and took him into custody based on a "gut instinct," as the FBI claimed.  The letter was produced by Mr. Stone's lawyer, Grant Smith, who sent it to the House and Senate Judiciary Committees.  It details a frightening tale of CNN acting on behalf of the FBI in regard to the continual Russia probe.

Documents Show CNN Was Tipped Off on Roger Stone Arrest by 29 FBI Armed Agents — Leaked by Deep State!.  CNN's camera crew allegedly arrived at Stone's residence a whole hour before the raid and CNN's Sara Murray provided Stone's attorney with a draft copy of the indictment in an early morning communique to confirm the FBI raid and arrest.  CNN was the only camera crew on the scene of the FBI raid on Roger Stone's home.  While CNN has spent an entire week claiming their presence at the FBI raid on Stone's South Florida home was a combination of luck and hard work, this evidence proves that their "source" was indeed the Office of the Special Counsel, who colluded with the notoriously anti-Trump news network to produce a propaganda broadcast of the arrest that is reminiscent of the Nazi era tactics of the Gestapo and propaganda ministry lead by Joseph Goebbels.

CNN Tries to Thread the Needle as Racist Past of Democrat Governor Ralph Northam Surfaces.  He's toast.  There's no way, no way, Democrat Governor Ralph Northam can survive the public scrutiny of his behavior in 1984 as a 25-year-old medical school graduate.  This is 1984, not 1964, 1984.  C'mon.

CNN Again Pushes False Narrative that Republicans Suppressed Voting Rights in 2018 Midterms.  During CNN Newsroom Thursday morning [1/31/2019], the panel blasted Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell for wanting to "restrict voting rights" because he opposed a Democrat House bill which would demand Election Day be made a paid federal holiday.

CNN Segment Tries To Paint Border Crisis As Hollywood Fiction.  CNN reporters compared the southern border crisis to Hollywood fiction on "New Day" Wednesday [1/30/2019] and played clips from the 2018 film "Sicario:  Day of the Soldado" to illustrate their point.  CNN correspondent Miguel Marquez narrated the piece, which intertwined clips of cartel violence from the film with news headlines and immigration soundbites from President Donald Trump.  The chyron read:  "Are Trump's Border Claims Hollywood Fantasy?"

CNN Hid Images and Video of Roger Stone's 72-Year-Old Wife Being Dragged Out of Home Barefoot and In Nightgown.  On Monday Roger Stone told Judge Napolitano in a FOX Nation interview that his 72-year-old wife was also forced to stand outside barefoot and in her nightgown.  For some strange reason this was not aired on CNN who had a camera crew at Stone's home during the arrest.  The Gateway Pundit wrote CNN for comment — It would be completely irresponsible if they hid this from the American public.

Jim Acosta Peddled Slime: 'Team of Vipers' Reveals CNN Printed Unsubstantiated Dirt on Sarah Sanders to Settle Ex-Trump Aide's Score.  An excerpt from former West Wing official Cliff Sims' new book — provided exclusively to Breitbart News ahead of the book's public release on Monday — shows how CNN's Jim Acosta peddled unsubstantiated misinformation from a disgruntled ex-Trump campaign aide about White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders as part of the network's effort to push the Stormy Daniels scandal story.  In other words, Sims' book reveals that CNN pushed out an attack on a current Trump aide by an ex-Trump aide — providing the ex-Trump aide with anonymity to shield the person's identity — and did not verify whether it was actually true before CNN printed it.

CNN Got an Inside Tip About the FBI Raid and It's Lying About It.  In response to the accusations by President Trump and others, that CNN had received an inside tip about the Roger Stone raid from the FBI, the news network published a whole article claiming that it had gotten the scoop by putting together various clues.  Nonsense.  There was no purpose to such an aggressive FBI raid without a camera crew standing by.  Previous defendants had been allowed to turn themselves in.  Why would it take multiple vehicles and personnel to arrest one man in his sixties?  There's nothing resembling practical necessity here.  And, without cameras standing by to broadcast the footage, the entire effect would have been lost. [...] Occam's Razor tells us that the FBI tipped off CNN.  And that needs to be investigated.

Anonymous Twitter Guy Turns Out To Be Better Reporter Than Jim Acosta.  An anonymous Twitter user spent his Friday night [1/11/2019] absolutely dismembering the border diary of CNN's Jim Acosta.  Acosta, for his part, spent Thursday filing short video diaries from McAllen, Texas. [...] His last video, shot by a portion of the border with no fence, was seemingly a direct response to President Donald Trump's criticism.  As if to make the idea of border security seem like a joke, Acosta playfully pointed out a shuffleboard court adjacent from the US border. [...] For a Twitter user going by the handle "Techno Fog," enough was enough.  Either Acosta didn't know, or he chose not to say, that the waterfront town he was reporting from is basically a Border Patrol firm base with a geographically advantageous position.

How news media omissions distort Russia probe narrative, and shield Democrats.  Counterintelligence investigations are by their very nature complex, nuanced and methodically slow, all facts that today's news media outlets seem to ignore as they chronicle the Russia collusion probe.  The past week provided fresh examples of how journalists endlessly seeking to portray the Russia probe in black-and-white terms can misinform the public through omission, cherry-picking or lack of context.  On Wednesday [1/9/2019], for example, CNN and others ran speculative reports suggesting Russians or Republicans could be involved in a mysterious grand jury subpoena fight involving special counsel Robert Mueller.

CNN's Don Lemon Wants to Delay President's Speech to Censor It.  Don Lemon wants a delay in the President's speech so CNN can censor it — edit, criticize, fake fact-check, morph it, and whatever else he thinks necessary.  And this is why they call CNN fake news.  Criticizing the President for calling them fake news seems silly in light of the fact that Lemon is ready to air fake news.  Even Chris Cuomo looked confused and was forced to defend the President.  He said the President has the right to present his case to the American people.

Don Lemon Suggests There Be an On Air 'Delay' During Trump's Speech.  On his program Monday night, CNN's Don Lemon urged the network to incorporate a "delay" during President Trump's primetime address on border security, such as one you'd have during a live awards ceremony when Christian Bale or Patricia Arquette step up to the mic with no filter.  Otherwise, it's like their network will be "promoting propaganda" that comes out of Trump's mouth, Lemon feared.  "People will believe it whether the facts are true or not," Lemon said.

The Editor says...
Read that last sentence again.  In it, Mr. Lemon summarized the success of CNN.

Here are the Most Egregious Fake News Stories of 2018.  [#2] CNN and The Hill spread retracted sexual assault claim against Kavanaugh:  CNN and The Hill both reported on a sexual assault claim against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh in late September without ever mentioning that the claim had been quickly retracted.  Jeffrey Catalan apologized for making a "mistake" in leveling the false claim against Kavanaugh, but CNN and The Hill's initial reports on the claim failed to note the retraction.  The Hill later retracted a tweet bolstering the claim and CNN updated its misleading report.

Writer touted by CNN as 'Journalist of the Year' forced to resign for fabricating stories.  The German magazine Der Spiegel revealed Wednesday that one of its top award-winning journalists fabricated many of his articles, inventing characters, sources, and their quotes "on a grand scale" for many years.  Claas Relotius, a reporter and editor, admitted to fabricating parts of at least 14 stories following the magazine's internal investigation.  The publication said the issue "marks a low point in the 70-year history of Der Spiegel."  "I am sick and I need to get help," he reportedly told the magazine.

Trump Provides Example of Google Bias After Being Called a Liar.  During Obama's presidency, Google put his State of The Union addresses on the front page of their site every year, while Trump's have never been featured.  Meanwhile, CNN said Trump propped up a "false claim" that big tech is censoring conservatives and called it a conspiracy.

DHS Shuts Down Fake News From CNN's Jim Sciutto.  The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) responded Wednesday after CNN accused President Donald Trump of making up statistics about illegal immigration.  Trump claimed during a meeting with House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer this week that terrorists are illegally immigrating to the United States.  "People are pouring into our country, including terrorists.  We caught 10 terrorists over a short period of time," Trump said.  CNN anchor Jim Sciutto asserted multiple times that Trump was incorrect, writing, "DHS did not provide evidence of a single terrorist caught at the southern border over the very last short period of time as the president claimed."

The Editor says...
The president's claims are not disproven just because the government does not provide evidence to CNN upon demand.  I think the President should not provide CNN with any information at all, since it would likely be used against him later.

CNN 'Fact-Check' on Trump Crushed After DHS Provides Actual Facts on Terrorists.  CNN's Jim Sciutto was one of the many journalists this week who attacked President Trump's comments about border security during his meeting with Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer Tuesday.  Sciutto even did a whole segment "fact-checking" the president on Wednesday's CNN Newsroom.  Unfortunately for him, actual experts from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) called out his reporting on Twitter with a brutal comeback.  The former Obama staffer turned CNN host took to Twitter to brag about his "fact-check" of Trump's claims about DHS stopping terrorists at the border, dismissing it as fear-mongering.

America's Trojan Horses Are Sacking Us From Within.  The most deceptive Trojan Horse trots around as compassion.  By twisting the meaning of equality, fairness and justice, liberals shame politicians into overspending on social programs, ignoring federal laws, and giving special rights to "victim" groups.  The migrant caravan is the latest victim group.  Carrying the Honduran flag, thousands of migrants stormed the Mexican border headed for America, taunting Trump along the way.  They used women and children as human shields, attacked U.S. Border Patrol, and admitted they're just looking for a better life.  The "caravan" turned out to be a Trojan Horse — unarmed intruders disguised as asylum seekers.  But the rock-throwing didn't stop CNN's Chris Cuomo from trying to disarm us with compassion.

There's No Terrorism Like Islamic Terrorism, Despite the Left's Lies.  Donald Lemon, on CNN:  "So, we have to stop demonizing people and realize the biggest terror threat in this country is white men, most of them radicalized to the right.  And we have to start doing something about them.  There is no travel ban on them.  There is no ban on — they had the Muslim ban.  There is no white guy ban.  So, what do we do about that?"  Racist Donald Lemon chooses to make this a race issue, and yet you never hear him refer to ubiquitous Muslim terrorism by the race of its perpetrators, as most Muslim terrorists are non-white.  Another leftist hack, politician Corey Booker, told CNN in January, "In American history since 9/11, we've had 85 major attacks in our country, 73 percent of them have been by white nationalist hate groups."  As I noted above, this lying leftist cites the study that conveniently and deviously begins on 9/11, in order to downplay or even exonerate Islamic terrorism, and not even mentioning leftist terrorism, in order to conveniently make it appear that his political opponents are the most dangerous terrorists around.

Murdered WaPo 'Reporter' Jamal Khashoggi [was] Connected to Osama bin Laden, Muslim Brotherhood and Russiagate [and] Wasn't Even [a] US Green Card Holder.  Murdered WaPo 'Reporter' Jamal Khashoggi was connected to Osama bin Laden and the Muslim Brotherhood.  It also turns out he may have been related to Russiagate and he wasn't even a US citizen.  In October, CNN criticized reports that Washington Post reporter, Jamal Khashoggi was related to Osama bin Laden.  They said this was all talking points [...] But what CNN doesn't report and what Khashoggi may have neglected to note is that when Khashoggi was with bin Laden in Afghanistan he was very much in sync with bin Laden, as noted in the Arab Weekly [...]

Acosta Told Court Under Penalty of Perjury That He 'Politely' Questioned Trump.  Jim Acosta, the chief White House correspondent for CNN, told the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia last week, in a written declaration delivered under penalty of perjury, that he "politely" questioned President Donald Trump at a November 7 press conference.  Acosta submitted the sworn declaration, which is dated Nov. 13, as part of the lawsuit he and CNN have brought against President Trump, White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders and other White House officials for revoking his White House reporter's "hard pass."

Lemon leads most outrageous assertion, yet: 'ALL pro-Trump white women are racist,' deeply invested in supremacy.  An outrageous discussion unfolded on CNN recently focused on how most white women who voted for President Donald Trump must be "racist."  Only one of the all-female panel hosted by CNN's Don Lemon pushed back in the discussion on why the president resonates with most white women, delivering a blistering take-down of the argument that white women who have a "deep investment in white supremacy" voted for Trump.  Lemon began by asking liberal contributor Kirsten Powers "why white women support Donald Trump in spite of or perhaps because of his policies and his tone," during Friday's [11/16/2018] "CNN Tonight."

Post-Midterm Meltdowns.  CNN has sued the president and his entourage for revoking Jim Acosta's White House press pass.  This is the perfect illustration of the presumptuousness of the fake news press.  This description "fake news" was furnished by the president when CNN took the Steele dossier public and asked the president if he had participated in a festival of urination by a group of prostitutes in a Moscow hotel room because the Obamas had slept there.  In those early days of the administration, Wolf Blitzer claimed immense enterprise by CNN to unearth the dossier (that the Democratic National Committee, which paid for it, was shopping desperately to the media).  CNN elaborately portrayed this now infamous hack-job as the work of an eminent retired British espionage official.  After Acosta attempted to filibuster the president's post-midterm press conference and engage him in debate, the revocation of Acosta's pass was an appropriate measure.  CNN has many other accredited representatives and could nominate a replacement, but the network's media director, Brian Stelter, a foaming-at-the-mouth Trump-hater, instead has sued the president.

The Evidence Is Overwhelming.  While bloviating and ululating about the illusory and innumerate Great White Terror Threat last week, [CNN's Don] Lemon stated unequivocally that we needn't be concerned about foreign terrorists:  ["]We don't need to worry about people who are thousands of miles away.  The biggest threats are homegrown.  The facts prove that.["]  Sure they do — if you start tallying dead bodies on the day AFTER 9/11/2001.  But if you count the nearly 3,000 dead bodies stacked up on 9/11, it's not even close.  The facts prove that.  Then in a startling display of egregious doublethink, Lemon said in the same sentence that "we have to stop demonizing people" before demonizing white males: [...]

CNN Interview Appears to Choose 'Random' Rally Goer - Turns Out to be Andrew Gillum's Mom.  CNN reporter Randi Kaye was conducting interviews at a rally for Florida Democratic gubernatorial candidate Andrew Gillum on Friday when she "randomly" interviewed Gillum's mother.  Former President Barack Obama spoke in support of Gillum, who currently serves as the mayor of Tallahassee, at a Miami, Florida rally on Friday.  Gillum is squaring off against Republican Florida Rep. Ron DeSantis.

No, CNN: Nationalism Is Not White Supremacy.  One doesn't know whether to laugh or cry at this.  Laugh at the absurdity that the concept of "nationalism" has anything whatsoever to do with race.  Or cry at the realization that yet again, as is true of the Left throughout American history, the obsession with race is something the liberal media cannot and will not leave in the ash heap of history where it belongs.

CNN Attempts to Blame President Trump for Suspicious Packages.  No one yet really knows what the motives are behind mailing packages containing fake pipe-bombs to high-profile members of the Trump 'resistance'.  Hopefully the FBI will identify the perpetrators quickly.  However, given the history of left-wing political activity and their use of fake hate crime as a tool to advance victim politics, the strongest origination likelihood is a person or group connected to left-wing activism.  Toward that suspicion there is growing Alinsky-motive visible amid media.  CNN is desperate to pin the blame on President Trump.  Check out the Alinsky model narrative engineering on display today.  It starts out by labeling the recipients as "Trump's targets":

CNN Anchor Lies About Remarks Made By Trump, Trump Jr.  CNN anchor Ana Cabrera falsely claimed on Sunday [10/14/2018] that President Donald Trump and Donald Trump Jr. made racial remarks over the last week that white men have a lot to fear.  "President Trump and his son Don Jr. said this week white men have a lot to fear right now," Cabrera said during a segment on black people who have had the police called on them by white people.  Trump and Trump Jr. never said that, though.  Earlier this month Trump said it was a "very scary time for young men in America" as he spoke about men being falsely accused of crimes as it related to the allegations made against then-Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

CNN Promotes Misleading Article With Further Misleading Tweet.  A CNN headline and the tweet promoting the article provided a misleading impression about one of the alleged witnesses to the alleged sexual assault on Christine Blasey Ford by Brett Kavanaugh.  The headline on the article read "Christine Blasey Ford's friend is not refuting Ford's allegation, will cooperate with FBI, lawyer says."  Its accompanying tweet read:  "Christine Blasey Ford's friend, Leland Ingham Keyser, is not refuting Ford's allegation against Brett Kavanaugh and will cooperate with the FBI, her lawyer says."  Activist Ken Gardner pointed out the misleading framing in a reply to CNN's tweet:  "Hi, CNN, she repeated what she told the Judiciary Committee: she has no knowledge of the party and had never met Kavanaugh at any event, with or without Ford present.  If this is what you call 'not refuting,' no wonder no one trusts your reporting."

CNN And The Hill Spread Retracted Sexual Assault Claim — Without Mentioning It Was Retracted.  CNN and The Hill both spread a bombastic accusation of sexual assault against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh on Wednesday, without mentioning that the man who made the accusation has since retracted the claim and apologized for making it.  A Rhode Island man called Democratic Rhode Island Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse's office and claimed that Kavanaugh and one of the judge's high school friends, Mark Judge, had drunkenly sexually assaulted a friend of his while in Rhode Island in 1998, according to the transcript of a Senate Judiciary Committee interview with Kavanaugh.  The man's name was redacted in the transcripts released to the public but the investigator quoted verbatim several outlandish anti-Trump tweets from the man's Twitter account, allowing reporters to definitively identify him on Twitter as "Jeffrey Catalan."

Yes, the Mainstream Media Is the Enemy.  CNN, for example, "resigned" three journalists, including an executive editor, for their involvement in a story that relied on an "anonymous source" who had the scoop on a fictitious "Russian investment fund with ties to Trump officials" and the nonexistent investigation thereof.  After the network concluded that "standard editorial processes were not followed," (read:  they were caught misinforming the American people, and caught as the operative) CNN axed the trio, including Eric Lichtblau, then a CNN new hire but a veteran of the Times and a Pulitzer Prize recipient.  It's unclear what became of that "anonymous source."

Why is CNN avoiding the truth about Lanny Davis' lies?  It all started with last month's bombshell CNN report that Cohen, Trump's former personal attorney, was claiming his then-boss knew in advance of the 2016 Trump Tower meeting between campaign officials and a Russian operative. [...] Last week, however, Davis publicly stated that Cohen knew no such thing, and had never said otherwise.  He then 'fessed up to his anonymous claims to the New York and Washington papers, while still insisting he wasn't a source for the CNN report.  It was only this week that he admitted he actually was a CNN source.

CNN Lashes Out at President Trump 'We Don't Lie!'  In July, CNN rolled out a story using anonymous sources wherein they reported Michael Cohen claimed Trump knew about the Trump Tower meeting with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya in advance.  Perhaps to cover their bases, CNN also reported Michael Cohen told the Senate Intel Panel last year in a closed-door interview that he didn't know about the Trump Tower meeting in advance and didn't know whether Trump did either.  This dumpster fire of an article was published just a couple weeks after Cohen hired sewer dweller and Clinton fixer Lanny Davis to be his lawyer.

CNN Boldly Decides It No Longer Needs Reliable Sources.  On July 27, CNN aired a news story in which it claimed President Donald Trump had advance knowledge of the meeting at Trump Tower between members of his campaign team and two Russians working with Fusion GPS. Despite the fact Trump has repeatedly stated that he didn't know about this meeting until after it had occurred, two anonymous sources assured CNN that former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen personally witnessed the then-candidate for the presidency being told the details about the forthcoming meeting.  The two sources went on to claim that Cohen wanted to make this assertion to special counsel Robert Mueller.  So excited was the mainstream media by this anonymously sourced story that it dominated the headlines for days.  Trump was caught now!  Soon, Mueller would have Cohen under oath before a grand jury, and then Trump's collusion with the two Russians at the Trump Tower meeting, Natalia Veselnitskaya and Rinat Akhmetshin, would be fully exposed!  Never mind the fact that by this point, it's been revealed these two Russian lobbyists were affiliated with Fusion GPS, the same research firm that produced the Steele dossier, which had sent them to this meeting to lobby Trump's team against the Magnitsky Act sanctions.

Another Very Fake News Scandal Engulfs CNN with Fake Michael Cohen Russia Story.  Another very fake news scandal has engulfed CNN as the network's credibility crisis reaches another fever pitch just over a year after three senior network staffers were forced to resign in disgrace over a similar scandal.  This time, though, famed Watergate reporter Carl Bernstein is at the center of the scandal, and the network for now is dug in despite deep criticism from across the political and ideological spectrum as far-ranging as Breitbart News and Daily Caller among others on one side, and the Associated Press, Washington Post, BuzzFeed, and more on the other.

If You Want To Know Why Conservatives Don't Trust Media, Watch CNN.  On July 27, CNN reported that Donald Trump's personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, would be willing to tell Special Counsel Robert Mueller that the president knew in advance of the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting between his campaign and a Kremlin-linked lawyer who was allegedly selling dirt on Hillary Clinton. [...] Well, on Monday [89/27/2018] BuzzFeed ran another article in which Davis admitted to being CNN's source as well, even though the network had initially claimed that Davis had declined to comment for the article — which turns out not only to be untrue but a ham-fisted way to hide the story's origin.  "We stand by our story, and are confident in our reporting of it," the network responded.

CNN's Jeffrey Toobin Falsely Blames Antifa Violence on Black Americans.  CNN senior legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin bizarrely pinned the blame for Antifa violence on black Americans Tuesday night [8/28/2018], saying that the far-left group is "widely perceived as an African-American organization."  In response to President Trump warning of Antifa violence should Democrats win the midterms, Jeffrey Toobin said, "Let's be clear also about what's going on here.  The theme here is, 'I'm Donald Trump and I'll protect you from the scary black people.'"  "Antifa is widely perceived as an African-American organization, and this is just part of the same story of LeBron James and Don Lemon and Maxine Waters and the NFL players and the UCLA basketball players," he continued.

CNN's Jim Sciutto Busted for Two Fake News Scoops in One Week.  CNN's Jim Sciutto has had two big scoops debunked as very fake news in just one week.  Sciutto, CNN's chief national security correspondent, joined the far-left network after serving in Barack Obama's White House for a few years.  His bias and dishonesty has made already him a laughingstock on more than one occasion, but this was an especially bad week for the anti-Trump activist.  Last week, Sciutto misled the public with a breathless piece of "breaking news" that falsely claimed President Trump did not consult with Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats prior to revoking the security clearance of John Brennan, the former CIA chief who, like Sciutto, served in the Obama administration.

The left's enforcers:  CNN sues to reveal names and addresses of Manafort jurors.  Less than a week after making a stink about freedom of the press, President Trump, and "enemies of the people," CNN and apparently other news outlets have decided to get into the harassment business, given that reporting news is just not good enough for them. [...] So now they've gotten into the jury-tampering business.  They're more interested in who the jury is than the trial itself.

CNN's Cuomo Says Antifa's Fight Is Moral Even After They Attack Cops, Reporters.  CNN's Chris Cuomo suggested on Monday night that violence carried out by Antifa is not as bad as violence committed by racists because Antifa's cause is moral and just — even after they attacked police and reporters over the weekend at the "Unite the Right" rally in Washington, D.C.  The segment came after a couple of dozen racists came out in support of the "Unite the Right" rally and were met by a large gathering of Antifa thugs who ended up attacking reporters and police officers.  Cuomo downplayed Antifa's violence by saying they only "confronted" police and "berated" journalists.

CNN Caught Putting Socialist on Panel to Pretend He's a Disillusioned Trump Voter.  CNN is a sorry excuse for a news network.  They push fake news every day but their latest venture is beyond the pale.  The New Day hosts and panel in the video are outrageous liars.  CNN should call themselves the Goebbels network.  What you are about to see in the video is unadulterated propaganda.  It's incredible, it really is.  They put so-called Trump voters on a panel and one plant, who claimed to be a disillusioned Trump voter turned hater, is a Socialist.  He has always hated President Trump.  [Video clip]

CNN Op-Ed slammed for comparing military to the media, says both are 'protecting our freedoms'.  CNN has been mocked widely for publishing an opinion piece calling for Americans to thank the media the way members of the military are acknowledged because they are both "protecting our freedoms" and "the stakes have never been higher."  University of Notre Dame management professor Joseph Holt wrote the essay headlined, "The press isn't the enemy, it's the protector," which was published last week.  The ridiculed piece is labeled "opinion" and notes "the views expressed here are solely the author's."

CNN Jokes About Obvious Truth:  US Media Works With Intelligence Community.  As CNN reporter, Gary Tuchman, mocked supporters of Donald Trump who displayed signs supporting the internet "Q-Anon" movement, he blatantly misrepresented a well-established fact.  Tuchman taunted one Trump supporter who said mainstream media was 'weaponized by the CIA' saying:  "I don't know anyone in the CIA except for a few people I've interviewed over the years?  But weaponized by the CIA? What does that even mean? ... Do you think I'm weaponized by the CIA?"  The truth is that mainstream media does indeed have a relationship with intelligence agencies, and the US government works very hard to control and cooperate with the mainstream media to achieve its goals.

Now they see themselves as soldiers.  Yesterday [8/6/2018], CNN had the audacity to publish an "opinion" piece by an ethics professor from Notre Dame that compares "journalists" to soldiers. [...] It must be "journalistic ethics" that inspired Politico reporter Marc Caputo to call us gap-toothed garbage people.  "Accuracy and fairness?"  Like cutting video to make it look like Trump emptying a box of fish food was some kind of never-before-seen boorishness the likes of which the world has ever known?  Was it that "demanding code of journalistic ethics" that inspired Chris Cillizza to put a rifle scope on a gif of President Trump?  Sleeping with a Senate staffer to get classified information — talk about a demanding code of journalistic ethics.  How many retractions and corrections have the news media had to make over the last two years?

CNN Claims To Support The First Amendment.  Anyone who watches CNN for longer than five minutes will most likely hear the network complaining about President Donald Trump's "attacks" on the media, labeling him as a threat to free speech and "our Democracy."  But does CNN really support the First Amendment?  Hardly.  CNN regularly engages in seeking to silence those who criticize their network or those who offer facts that counter the narrative of the Democratic Party.

Hey Media, You Started ItNew York Times publisher A.G. Sulzberger says he told Trump his anti-press rhetoric could lead to violence.  But the media's anti-Trump rhetoric already has led to violence:  public officials rat-packed and bullied, Trump supporters harassed, White House spokes-lady Sarah Sanders having to live under guard.  And yet when Sanders pointed this out to Look-At-Me-I'm-Jim Acosta, Acosta stormed out of the room.  [Indeed], if he doesn't want to hear the truth, he could just stay home and watch CNN.

CNN's Acosta Makes Absurd Claim About Trump Rally After Getting Criticized.  CNN's Jim Acosta complained on Wednesday evening [8/1/2018] about the way he was treated yesterday during President Donald Trump's rally in Tampa, Florida, claiming that he felt like he "wasn't in America anymore."  Appearing on HLN with host S.E. Cupp, Acosta recounted his experience at the recent Trump rally where he was mocked and Trump supporters chanted "CNN S---s!" while he was on camera.  "Honestly, it felt like we weren't in America anymore," Acosta said.  "I don't know how to put it any more plainly than that."

CNN: The OPPO Research Arm Of The Democratic Party.  Everyone knows that CNN is maniacally devoted, 24/7, to trying to destroy the Trump administration.  But it doesn't end there.  CNN is all in for the Democratic Party, and is doing its part to help the Dems capture the House in November.  See, e.g., the KFile, billed by CNN as "the leading investigation team for the social, mobile generation."  KFile features content by Andrew Kaczynski, pretty much all of which consists of anti-GOP smears.  Kaczynski came to CNN via Buzzfeed, which you should keep in mind next time someone tells you that CNN represents legitimate journalism.  Kaczynski has a vendetta against my Congressman Jason Lewis, who represents Minnesota's 2nd District.  The 2nd is a swing district that the Democrats hope to capture this year; hence Kaczynski's interest.

CNN: Revoking Security Clearance of James Clapper Is 'National Security Threat!'  How exactly is it a "national security threat" to revoke security clearance of someone who no longer works for the government, but now works as an analyst for CNN?  Finally taking away security clearance from him, as well as from John Brennan, who now works for MSNBC, James Comey and others who worked for Obama makes perfect sense.

CNN Anchor Calls Russian Meddling 'A Terror Strike'.  CNN host Michael Smerconish went on a rant Saturday morning calling the Russian election meddling "a terror strike."  [Video clip]

The World Throws An Anti-Trump Protest At NATO, Hardly Anybody Shows Up.  Here's how CNN saw President Trump's first day at the big NATO summit in Brussels, Belgium:  "Trump outrages on the world stage, again."  In something called "The Point," CNN said:  "Trump's comments at the NATO summit seemingly further alienated the United States from its allies.  And this is only day one of his foreign trip."  The piece also quoted former Secretary of State John Kerry saying, "The President set America back this morning.  He is steadily destroying our reputation in the world."  That's the take of the mainstream media in America.  It's the exact same take the MSM had when George W. Bush was president.  Bush, to them, was a bumbling fool stomping over the world stage with his "cowboy diplomacy."  But Barack Obama, he — The Chosen One — would make the world love America again.

Brian Stelter skewered after bragging CNN skipped Trump rally.  CNN's in-house media magpie Brian Stelter was ridiculed Wednesday night [6/20/2018] after bragging on Twitter that his network didn't air President Trump's rally in Duluth, Minn. which occurred hours after he signed an executive order to end the separation of families who cross the border illegally. [...] The CNN media reporter was, as the kids say, "ratioed," which is when negative comments far outnumber the likes and retweets on a particular tweet.

Sarah Sanders to CNN Reporter:  You And Your Network Falsely Accused Me of Not Wanting to Be Here.  White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders aimed fire at CNN Senior White House correspondent Jeff Zeleny Monday [6/18/2018] for CNN claiming that Sanders did not want to do the briefing that day.  Sanders was referencing a tweet from CNN's media reporter Oliver Darcy, who tweeted that Zeleny learned from a White House official alleged Sanders did not want to do the briefing amid questions on the Trump administration's child separation policy.

Feinstein: 'I Didn't Really Know Enough' About Mistreatment of Undocumented Immigrants During Obama Years.  Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D., Calif.) said Sunday [6/10/2018] that while former President Barack Obama was in office, she was not well enough aware of the mistreatment undocumented immigrants faced, saying she has since learned more about the issue.  CNN's Jake Tapper mentioned to Feinstein a recent viral photo of undocumented children in a holding cell that was tweeted out by former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa (D.).  The photo was shared by many who attempted to condemn the Trump administration's actions at the southern U.S. border.  The issue with the photo going viral for that reason is it was taken in 2014 while Obama was in office.

CNN White House Producer Calls Out CNN Contributor for False Tweet.  American Urban Radio White House correspondent April Ryan tweeted a misleading comment about President Donald Trump's celebration of America this afternoon at the White House.  Trump held the event in place of the Eagles Super Bowl celebration, which was hastily canceled after only a handful of Eagles players decided to attend.  Ryan, a CNN contributor, tweeted out that as Trump began speaking at the event, the crowd "heckled and booed" him and that reporters have "confirmed" this.

Very Fake News:  CNN's Stelter Lies About Melania Trump 'Disappearing'.  Following a surgical procedure on May 14, less than three weeks ago, the first lady has, understandably, not made any public appearances (she is scheduled to host some Gold Star families at the White House Monday night [6/4/2018]).  But this is not what the far-left [Brian] Stelter told his audience.  Instead, the anti-Trump activist repeatedly and deliberately misinformed his audience with the false claim she has been "invisible."  Stelter also allowed one of his guests to repeat the false claim the first lady has "disappeared."  This is simply not true.

Possibly related:
CNN's May Ratings Are In; They're Almost Too Pathetic To Believe.  CNN's endless pursuit of being the most anti-Trump cable news network is having backfiring consequences.  According to Ad Week, CNN didn't have a single show in the top 25 throughout the entire month of May.  Worse than that, the fake news network didn't have a program that averaged at least 900,000 total viewers.  As Fox News climbed in the ratings, CNN collapsed.

CNN's Ratings Collapse Marches into June.  Far-left cable channel CNN suffered a massive ratings collapse in May.  June is shaping up to be worse.  CNN stumbled out of May with a massive -25 percent ratings collapse when compared to the same month last year.  Because Fox News actually experienced total viewer growth and MSNBC's loss was a negligible two percent, we know the problem is CNN and not the news cycle or Americans tiring of the news.

Fake News:  CNN's April Ryan Falsely Reports Trump Booed at 'Celebration for America'.  CNN political analyst April Ryan sent social media into a frenzy after posting a false secondhand report that President Donald Trump was booed during the White House's "Celebration for America" event Tuesday [6/5/2018].  As President Trump began his remarks, a man shouted, "stop hiding behind the armed services and the national anthem."  The heckler was met with loud boos from attendees and was reportedly escorted from the premises.

The Spying That Dare Not Speak Its Name.  The media's pooh-poohing coverage of Spygate grows more laughable by the day.  Turn on CNN at almost any hour and you will see its farcical re-education camp in session — this or that host yelling louder and louder that no one "spied" on the Trump campaign.  As stupid as this coverage is, it is still worth dissecting, if only for its propagandistic shadings, telling omissions, and inadvertent revelations.  It is as if the media has an emergency manual at the ready in the event that a story starts hurting the Democrats, a manual which enjoins reporters to run away from it as fast as they can.  But if that's not possible, if they have to shelter in place, they are instructed to minimize the story and urge the public to avert its gaze from it.

This is only slightly off-topic:
The Astonishing Silliness of CNN.  [Scroll down]  Over the course of two airports, CNN was everywhere.  Before departure, CNN was rolling in our lunch restaurant.  Next door, CNN was burbling in a convenience store.  In the second airport, in the waiting area at the gate, CNN was not only surrounding me on several screens, but the sound was also piped in. [...] Join with me, America, and demand the channel be changed.  Or even better, to turn the TVs completely off, with the exception of major sporting events and occasional soothing nature specials.

The media's collusion delusion is collapsing.  CNN"s Brian Stelter has been a loyal member of the media's Praetorian Guard for ages, and he shows no signs of turning.  In his newsletter last night, Stelter devoted the majority of his writing to fighting back against recent revelations that the Justice Department used an informant to investigate spy on the Trump campaign in 2016.  The piece is clearly Stelter trying to weave a narrative.  When called out on that narrative-weaving, mainly using the phrase "far-right bloggers," Stelter leapt into his standard defense mode.  You see, HE wasn't saying it was "far-right bloggers;" someone else did and he just quoted that phrase from someone else. [...] Sure, Brian.  Your entire body of work since 2016 shows that you are clearly on a side of the aisle.  You've been a protector of your side of the aisle interests.  You call people conspiracy theorists when they put together information that the media has dribbled out piecemeal.  Then, when you are proven to be wrong, you can't man up and say that you're wrong.

The Definitive List Of Media Screw-Ups On The Trump-Russia Story.  [#1] CNN Accuses Don Jr. Of Wikileaks Collusion:  Last December, CNN's Manu Raju reported that Wikileaks emailed Donald Trump Jr. to give him access to stolen documents a full ten days before they were released to the public.  Unfortunately for CNN, it turns out their sources gave them the wrong date.  Don Jr. actually received an email with access to the stolen docs on Sept. 14, 2016, after they had already been released publicly.

This Is CNN: Hiring of Suspected Leaker Clapper Raises Ethical Questions.  CNN walked away with a prestigious journalism award at Saturday night's [4/28/2018] White House Correspondent's Association dinner for their role in making public a briefing by intelligence officials to then President-elect Donald Trump.  CNN reported the briefing "included allegations that Russian operatives claim to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump."  But the information briefed to the President was also leaked to the media by one of the same senior Obama administration officials who orchestrated the briefing and was hired by CNN months later as a paid analyst.  Some are questioning now if this was ethical — a pay for play of sorts — as it raises serious questions about the role and responsibility that U.S. intelligence officials have when taking on paid positions as analysts for news organizations, while still retaining their high-level security clearances.  It also raises similar questions about news organizations and their role of remaining objective and not paying their sources.

CNN Panel Gives Their Opinions About Why Opinion Shows Are Bad.  In a jaw-dropping display that was one part a lack of self-awareness and another part hypocrisy, Wednesday's [4/18/2018] prime-time Anderson Cooper 360 featured a panel of CNN analysts sharing their opinions about opinion shows like Hannity on Fox News.  Their opinions varied but were largely against the mixing of opinion and news.  And that was their opinion on the news of the day.  The hypocrisy was so thick you could cut it with a knife.  "I mean, personally, I have no problem with Fox News.  I'm glad Fox News is out there.  I'm glad MSNBC is out there.  I personally wouldn't want to do what either of them do," explained host Anderson Cooper.

CNN's sexist coverage of YouTube shooter pushes half-baked 'love triangle' narrative.  YouTube shooter Nasim Aghdam was a scorned woman who opened fire at the company's headquarters because she was spurned in a "love triangle."  That's the narrative CNN is pushing, to the annoyance of viewers, who called the half-baked theory sexist, misogynistic "fake news."[4/4/2018] CNN's crime and justice reporter Shimon Prokupecz floated the "love triangle" theory to Wolf Blitzer, when he blurted out that the shooting stemmed from "perhaps a love triangle."  Prokupecz did not provide any evidence to back[4/4/2018]up his claims, but the panel continued to speculate that the shooting was due to a romantic relationship gone wrong.

CNN mocked for glorifying JFKs 'legendary' infidelity after harping on sex allegations against Trump.  CNN was slammed for hypocrisy over the weekend when the network glorified President John F. Kennedy's many infidelities after spending significant coverage painting President Trump as a monster for an alleged affair that occurred prior to his political career.  While promoting "The Kennedys," CNN hailed the 35th president's "legendary love life," before asking, "Did one of his affairs connect him with the mob?"  The tweet featured video detailing JFK's relationship with actress Judy Campbell, who was allegedly intimate with the head of the Chicago mafia while also having an affair with the president.

No One Is Saying That.  Did you hear?  They're talking about repealing the Second Amendment.  It started with former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens and George Washington University Law Professor Jonathan Turley.  And it sure does seem like those calls prompted skeptics of American gun culture to echo their remarks.  Turley and Stevens were joined this week by op-ed writers in the pages of Esquire and the Seattle Times.  Democratic candidates for federal office have even enlisted in the ranks of those calling for an amendment to curtail the freedoms in the Bill of Rights.  Of course, this is just the most mainstream invocation of anti-Second Amendment themes that have been expressed unashamedly for years, from liberal activists like Michael Moore to conservative opinion writers at the New York Times. [...] You might be surprised to learn that none of this occurred.  It's only your vivid or, some might go so far as to say, fevered imagination.  Rest assured, CNN host Chris Cuomo insists that "no one" is calling for the repeal of the Second Amendment.  And even if they are, as Justice Stevens most certainly is, he's a "boogeyman" who commands no influence or respect.

CNN's Stelter Admits He Let David Hogg Get Away With Lies About Guns, NRA.  It's not often that CNN media reporter Brian Stelter is honest about his blatant biases when it comes to politics, just take his assertions about the President's mental fitness and his denials of making such connections.  But during an appearance on the Monday edition of HLN's S.E. Cupp Unfiltered, the Reliable Sources host appeared to let it slip that he let radical anti-gun activist David Hogg get away with making false claims about the guns and the NRA during a February 25 interview on his show.  Stelter's admission came after host S.E. Cupp questioned him about the wisdom of the media's obsession with elevating only the kids pushing gun control.

CNN In Full Meltdown Over Zinke Allegedly Favoring 'Excellence' Over 'Diversity'.  Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke is taking heat for allegedly telling staffers he would focus on "excellence" and finding the "best people" to work at the department, not "diversity."  Zinke's lack of concern over "diversity" at the Interior Department angered some staffers, who rushed to tell CNN.  The news network on Monday [3/26/2018] ran with the chyron:  "Zinke angers many by saying it's more important to find best people; Dept denies."  Each time Zinke was asked about diversity, he would respond, "what's important is having the right person for the right job," or "I care about excellence, and I'm going to get the best people, and you'll find we have the most diverse group anyone's ever had," sources told CNN.  Zinke's spokeswoman denied he made those comments, telling CNN "the anonymous claims made against the secretary are untrue."

CNN Runs Story Comparing ICE Agents To Nazis.  The full article tells the story of a Jewish woman who is hiding a Catholic, Latino family from deportation by Immigration and Customs Enforcement.  "For the woman, the link from the present to the history of World War II is strong," the authors write, noting that Jewish people also feared being kicked out of their homes during the Holocaust.  The article apparently does not feel the need to point out the key differences between Jewish people during the Holocaust and illegal immigrants in the U.S. — chiefly that Jewish people were being exterminated by their own government.  A number of people lashed out at CNN for the offensive comparison.

At the Box Office and Voting Booth, Leftist Fantasies Bomb.  [Scroll down]  And then, there's CNN.  The cable news outlet has spent the last fourteen months and more giving 24/7 coverage to a Russia-Trump conspiracy for which there is zero evidence, an epidemic of gun violence that does not exist, and what Brian Stelter, in a panic attack reminiscent of the little girl in Frobenius's anecdote, recently called "a rolling, ongoing, crisis" at the White House.  The result?  Like the Oscars, CNN's ratings have tanked.

Parkland Shooting:  Questions the Left Can't Answer.  Days after the shooting, CNN hosted a town hall meeting.  Rather than a thoughtful discussion regarding causes and potential solutions, it lived up to CNN's goal of a political rally.  Yet CNN claims that its meeting was not political.  Could CNN pour a cup of coffee without it being political?  Did CNN stack the audience and prep participants?  CNN has a history of planting Democrats in its town hall meetings.  One participant claimed that CNN gave him scripted questions to ask.  Plausible?  Isn't CNN the network that supplied Hillary Clinton with debate questions in advance?  CNN turned their town hall meeting into a Dana Loesch- and Marco Rubio-bashing fest.

CNN's Don Lemon apologizes for false criticism of Fox News.  One of CNN's top anchors partook this week in the press' favorite new game of sniggering at Fox News' programming decisions.  The problem here is that Don Lemon's exact claim, that Fox ignored news of White House communications director Hope Hick's looming resignation when it was first reported, is totally false.  Fox not only covered the Hick's news as soon as it was reported Wednesday afternoon, but the right-leaning cable news network also covered it every hour for the rest of the day.  "I said something last night that was an attempt to make a broader point about Fox News and how they downplay bad news about the administration," Lemon said Thursday evening [3/1/2018].

Florida Shooter Survivor's Father:  CNN Sought Out Political Statements for Interview.  CNN has turned a number of the survivors of the Parkland school shooting in Florida into mini-celebrities in the wake of the massacre.  It is seldom the case that survivors of these tragedies do speak out, so you can't blame the network for giving them airtime.  But we can blame CNN for using these survivors of a tragedy as pawns for gun control.  While we don't mean to attack the students personally, having survived such a tragedy doesn't add any validity to their calls for gun control, especially since I haven't seen any actual concrete proposals from these students.  I've just seen them call for "action."  What kind of action exactly?  Who knows — just "action."  They also want politicians to "do something."  What that something is isn't explained.  Likewise, views of the Parkland survivors who don't believe gun control is the answer aren't any more valid either, but they do exist, and CNN is not giving them airtime.  In fact, the only time CNN almost gave one of the pro-gun students a platform was at their recent town-hall event with Dana Loesch.  In that case, they wouldn't allow him to express his actual beliefs.

5 Other Times CNN Was Accused of Staging Something.  Anybody who watched CNN's town-hall meeting on gun control could easily tell the entire affair was designed to push a certain agenda.  The crowd was stacked and the viewpoint was singular in nature — ban all the guns!  The questions may have also been stacked.  Colton Haab, a member of the Junior ROTC credited with shielding students during the Parkland, Florida, school shooting, accused CNN of scripting questions for students.  Haab even went so far as to name the producer who told him to "stick to the script."  "Originally, I had thought that it was going to be more of my own question and my own say.  And then it turned out to be more of just a script," he said.  "And [the producer] had actually said that over the phone, that I needed to stick to the script."

Second person accuses CNN of trying to direct the narrative at gun town hall.  The father of a survivor of last week's school shooting in Parkland, Fla., said Thursday night [2/22/2018] that a CNN producer "insinuated" to him that the network was looking for people to interview that would "espouse a certain narrative."  Andrew Klein, whose daughter survived the school shooting, told Laura Ingraham on Fox News Thursday that he spoke to a CNN producer the day after the shooting, Feb. 15., and he took away from the conversation that they wanted to interview people that wanted to talk about the "policy implications of what happened in terms of preventing future mass shootings."

CNN Pimps Traumatized Kids To Push Politics.  Conservatives Should Boycott The Network.  Adults who prostitute traumatized teenagers to advance their political agenda should be ashamed of themselves, and those at CNN who do it should be fired. [...] Conservatives should be undeterred by this trick, rendered all the more transparent by a Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School student enrolled in the ROTC program, Colton Haab, who alleges that CNN told him to read a scripted question during their slanderous broadcast.  CNN is now calling that student a liar — because we must listen to the children except when what the children say is inconvenient for CNN.  Without falling into Democrats' trap and stooping to attack the ignorant teenagers themselves, conservatives should aim their criticism squarely at the craven adults who exploit them.  CNN so desperately seeks to manipulate its audience's emotions because the facts uniformly refute its gun-grabbing agenda.

Schoolboy Cameron Kasky.  The U.S. media apparatus — specifically for current events, CNN and Jake Tapper's narrative engineers — consistently indoctrinate and manipulate children.  Indeed, in the history of Fabian political advancement children have always been a focus point for advancing their authoritarian control objectives.  However, today — as with prior history, the media's ideological lust intoxicates them, and the engineers have a tendency to go too far.

CNN Fails to Disclose Former Handgun Control, Inc.  Spokesman Role of Jake Tapper, Host of CNN Parkland School Shooting Town Hall.  CNN's Jake Tapper, host of the town hall held Wednesday night in Sunrise, Florida on the February 14 Parkland school massacre worked in 1997 as a spokesman for Handgun Control, Inc., the precursor to the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence.  CNN and Tapper have failed to disclose Tapper's anti-gun activism in advance of the town hall.

CNN Scrambles:  Denies 'Scripted Question,' Invites Pro-Gun Student to Appear.  CNN issued a statement Thursday morning denying that it had asked a shooting survivor to ask a "scripted question" at the CNN Town Hall on guns on Wednesday evening [2/21/2018] in Sunrise, Florida.  On Wednesday evening, junior Colton Haab, a survivor of last week's mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, told local Fort Lauderdale ABC affiliate WPLG that CNN had invited him to appear at the town hall, but he had withdrawn after being asked to recite a "scripted" question.

CNN's Drew Griffin:  School Shooting Survivor Colton Haab Is Lying.  CNN's Drew Griffin explicitly accused school shooting survivor Colton Haab of lying over the student's claim that CNN wrote a question for him to recite at the far-left network's widely criticized anti-gun town hall.  On Thursday evening, President Trump tweeted out criticism of CNN's ongoing fake news crisis with a quote from Fox News's Tucker Carlson, who interviewed Haab Thursday night.  "'School shooting survivor says he quit @CNN Town Hall after refusing scripted question.' @TuckerCarlson," Trump tweeted, adding, "Just like so much of CNN, Fake News.  That's why their ratings are so bad!  MSNBC may be worse."

Colton Haab vs. CNN.  On Wednesday night CNN took up the 2018 children's crusade that is intended to produce gun control where previously there has only been left-wing frustration.  After the event, RealClear Politics posted local television video of Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School student Colton Haab. [...] Haab said he had been approached by CNN to ask a question at the event but decided not to after the network gave him a "scripted question" in lieu of one he wrote himself.  Yesterday morning [2/22/2018] CNN issued a statement to the effect "that it did not, and does not, script any questions for town hall meetings, ever."  I was surprised to see CNN disputing one of the youngsters possessing absolute moral authority, but Haab lost his immunity somewhere along the way.  Last night Tucker Carlson followed up with young Mr. Haab on FOX News.  RealClearPolitics has posted an account of the interview together with the video here.  I have embedded the video below.  Haab names a CNN name and supplies credible details supporting his claim.  He held in his hand the question he says CNN wrote for him.

CNN's Pro-Gun Control 'Children's Crusade' Exploited Grieving Students And Parents.  It's bad enough that the students of Marjorie Stoneman Douglas High School have been traumatized by the mass shooting by a former student that claimed 17 lives.  But gun control extremists in the media, Hollywood and Democratic Party now are exploiting them to achieve their dubious agenda of eliminating the Second Amendment.

CNN busted trying to put scripted words in mouth of hero Stoneman Douglas student at televised town hall.  CNN would be the object of humor if its behavior were not so contemptible.  Coming in the wake of its disgrace over using chyrons to proclaim President Trump a liar, giving up all pretense of objectivity, the latest scandal reveals an active propaganda effort to manufacture fake questions from real children, even from a boy hero who used his body to protect others during the shooting at Marjory Douglas Stoneman High School.  The narrative favoring the Democrats takes precedence over anything faintly resembling genuine discussion of the real views of the people who were victims of the shooting.

Shooting Survivor:  CNN Gave Me "Scripted Question" After Denying Question About Armed Guards.  Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School student Colton Haab said he was approached by CNN to ask a question at Wednesday night's town hall but decided not to after the network gave him a "scripted question," quashing one he wrote himself.  Haab, a member of the Junior ROTC shielded students while the school was under attack from the shooter, said he was going to ask about using veterans as armed security guards.  "CNN had originally asked me to write a speech and questions and it ended up being all scripted," Haab told WPLG-TV.

CNN's Chris Cuomo Caught Promoting Fake News Story About Buying AR-15 Without ID.  CNN reporter Chris Cuomo was caught sharing a 'fake news' story about a 20-year-old who was allegedly "able to buy an AR-15 in five minutes" without a valid driver's license.  Problem being, it never happened, and the author of the post, Cody Davis, even admits to it within the body of the story.  Oh, there's no doubt he's trying to convince you that he could have walked out of the store with an AR-15 in five minutes, but there's also no doubt that he definitively did not buy the gun.  In fact, he didn't even fill out the paperwork for the background check.

CNN resorts to its usual fake news hackery on Florida gun laws.  In some areas, such as Chicago, Detroit, Baltimore, California, New Jerse and New York, there are are draconian gun restrictions.  Heavily burdensome.  Yet, interestingly, there are a lot of crimes that occur there that involve the use of guns.

Ted Cruz Did A 15 Minute Interview With CNN — They Aired None Of It, Then Attacked Him For Not Coming On-Air.  CNN was very upset that Republicans were not coming on their programming in the wake of the school shooting tragedy this week.  On Wednesday, a gunman opened fire at Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, killing 17.  Brian Stelter — CNN's human-egg hybrid — personally whined that GOP congressmen were "scared" to come on their programming after the tragedy.  "What are they afraid of?" a CNN graphic flashed on "New Day."

Ted Cruz destroys CNN's sanctimonious Brian Stelter.  When tragedy strikes you can count on CNN's media critic/cheerleader Brian Stelter to make it all about him and his network.  The morning after the horrific school shooting in Parkland, Florida, Stelter decided to call out three Republican politicians that he and his network claimed were "afraid of" appearing on CNN.  Cruz was included in the graphic and shot back fiercely.  Stelter was left looking like a fool.

Ted Cruz Just Blew Open CNN's Blatant Lie About Him Being Too Scared To Give An Interview AGAIN.  Yesterday, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) completely clowned CNN for their claim that he's too chicken to come on their network to discuss the Parkland shooting by showing them that he's demonstrated multiple times that he's not.  "Gosh," said Cruz to CNN, "I seem to recall doing not 1, not 2, but THREE town hall debates w/[Bernie Sanders] on [CNN] Each 90 min long.  You can accuse me of many things, but being afraid of CNN is not one of them...."  Regardless, CNN is continuing the narrative that Cruz is too scared to appear on the network to discuss the hard issues.  Whether this is to give off the impression that Cruz is too afraid to discuss gun control because the Parkland shooting makes him wrong about his stances, that CNN is a legitimate news network that Republicans are afraid of, or both, is anyone's guess.

CNN hires Comey fanboy to "defend" FBI.  Scott [Johnson] says James Comey may be the least self-aware man in America.  I agree.  Comey is a legend in his own mind.  Comey is also a legend in the mind of Josh Campbell, his former special assistant at the FBI.  In an op-ed for USA Today, Campbell called his former boss "a giant of a man with an even bigger heart, whose focus was always on trying to understand and improve the lives of others."  Campbell also wrote an op-ed for the New York Times in which he stated he was leaving the FBI because of "relentless attacks on the bureau."  Campbell claimed that these attacks "undermine not just America's premier law enforcement agency but also the nation's security."  Thus, he said, he "was reluctantly turning in my badge and leaving an organization I love."  (If the ability of a GS-13 FBI employee to get an op-ed published in the New York Times strikes you as odd, you are not alone.  It struck retired FBI supervisory special agent James Gagliano that way too).  CNN immediately hired Campbell as its "law enforcement analyst," a gig he no doubt had lined up before he wrote his sanctimonious New York Times piece.

Jim Acosta Spreads Fake News, Tries to Correct It Unobserved.  Embattled, anti-Trump CNN reporter Jim Acosta went and contradicted his own previous reporting on Andrew McCabe Monday [1/29/2018].  Reports came out across various news organizations that FBI deputy director McCabe was stepping down from his position, months ahead of his planned exit.

CNN's Jim Acosta Spreads FAKE News About McCabe Stepping Down As FBI Deputy Director.  [Scroll down]  Rather than issue a correction, Acosta quoted tweeted himself, attempting to make it seem as though his primary tweet was half of the story.  Acosta was swiftly busted.  "'More' is an odd way to spell 'correction,'" tweeted the Washington Free Beacon's Alex Griswold.

CNN Democrat Bought Hundreds Of Thousands Of Fake Twitter Followers.  Did you know it's possible to buy Twitter followers to make yourself look more important?  There are companies which actually provide this service for a fee.  And it turns out Hilary Rosen, a Democrat consultant who frequently appears on CNN was a customer for one of them.

CNN's Hilary Rosen Shows She Might Just Be A Lot Dumber Than You Ever Imagined.  Life can come at you pretty hard when you are a shameless hypocrite.  Yesterday [1/27/2018], "Democrat strategist" and CNN contributor Hilary Rosen was slagging on President' Donald Trump's twitter account. [...] The fact is that when you have several million followers you really can't police them unless you hire staff to do it.  People follow you for all kinds of reasons.  Some are your fans.  Some hate you and are documenting everything you say.  You can't keep bots from following you and you can't keep bots from retweeting you.  Not only is it time consuming it doesn't matter.  But there is a big difference between having bots follow you and this: [...]

CNN Has 'Lost It'.  I'm starting to worry about CNN's "mental fitness." [...] They repeat themselves with "alarming frequency."  Just try to turn on CNN and not see the word "Russia" on the screen.  That has been CNN's coverage, since Thursday [1/11/2018].  Clearly CNN has to devote hours upon hours to its favorite kind of story:  the "too good to check" kind.  Like MSNBC's Katy Tur says, "It feels true."

CNN's New Excuse For Anderson Cooper's Anti-Trump Tweet Is Absolutely Ridiculous.  Anderson Cooper and CNN came up with an absolutely hilarious explanation for a pretty vicious anti-Trump tweet posted on Wednesday on his personal Twitter feed.

Oops, CNN did it again.  CNN on Monday [12/11/2017] walked back an "exposé" on Attorney General Jeff Sessions that turns out to have exposed nothing, except maybe the network's own bias.  The original report back in May blared that Sessions hadn't listed those two meetings with Russia's ambassador on his FBI disclosure forms prior to his Senate confirmation hearings.  Now CNN admits that the FBI told Sessions not to list any of his dozens of meetings with other countries' diplomats as part of his senatorial duties.  To be fair, the May story did note the Sessions camp's claims about the FBI's guidelines.  But it also quoted a Beltway "expert" as saying that Sessions should've listed every meeting anyway.  What forced CNN to "clarify"?  A right-wing group's Freedom of Information request produced an FBI e-mail from March that proved Sessions right.

CNN Walks Back Jeff Sessions-Russia Bombshell.  CNN has quietly walked back more of their "bombshell" reporting on the Trump-Russia collusion narrative, and this time it's a story relating to Attorney General Jeff Sessions' security clearance forms.  In May, CNN reported that Sessions had failed to disclose meetings he had with the Russian ambassador when he was a senator.  Justice Department officials told CNN that Sessions had not listed those meetings on a security clearance form, even though the form says to list "any contact" with the "foreign government" or its "representatives" in the past seven years.

CNN's 'Reliable Sources' Turns Network's Colossal Screwup Into An Attack On Trump.  CNN's "Reliable Sources," hosted by Brian Stelter, bills itself as a show that provides "the story behind the story, how the media really works, and how the news really gets made."  But the show, which airs Sunday mornings, failed to live up to that billing in its discussion of its massive screwup on a CNN story about Trumpworld that the network was forced to correct on Friday [12/8/2017].  Stelter addressed CNN's blunder for a couple of minutes, offering up a brief review of the reporting of the story.  The media reporter then quoted the network's public relations department, which downplayed the scandal.

'The LEAST trusted name in news': Trump blasts CNN.  President Trump blasted CNN on Saturday over a mistake in its report which wrongly claimed his son Donald Jr. received hacked DNC files before they were made public, describing the error as 'vicious and purposeful'.  In his weekly early-morning flurry of tweets at around 8am, the president fumed:  'Fake News CNN made a vicious and purposeful mistake yesterday [12/8/2017].  'They were caught red handed, just like lonely Brian Ross at ABC News (who should be immediately fired for his "mistake").[...]'

18 Questions CNN Needs To Answer After Getting Busted For Fake News.  Early on Friday, CNN promoted its latest breathless report purporting to show collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.  CNN has been extremely invested in the narrative of collusion for the last year.  In June, CNN was forced to pull one of its Russia-Trump conspiracy stories that "did not meet CNN's editorial standards."  The discredited story was based on a single anonymous source who connected Anthony Scaramucci, a prominent ally of President Trump, to a Russian investment fund managed by a Kremlin-controlled bank.  Three journalists who worked on the story were fired.

7 Times CNN Botched The News In 2017.  CNN has had a rough 2017 and it's not even over yet.  The news network has repeatedly made key errors when breaking big stories, only to get embarrassed when the facts come to light.

Laura Ingraham Rips CNN For 'Sloppy Reporting': 'Sometimes It's Not Fake News, It's Just Wrong News'.  On Friday night [12/8/2017], Laura Ingraham slammed CNN for their botched report on Donald Trump Jr.  'Sometime it's not fake news; it's just wrong news," Ingraham began.  Earlier that morning, CNN reported that during the election, WikiLeaks gave Don Jr. accesses to hacked DNC emails before they were made public.  That report turned out to be inaccurate and was corrected in the afternoon.  The Fox News host said that the error left CNN "once again with fried egg on its face."  She then listed some of the media's mistakes, [...]

Watch CNN Trot Out Reporter Who Published Fake News To Correct His Own Fake News.  CNN made an egregious reporting error Friday [12/8/2017] on the potential connection between Donald Trump Jr. and Wikileaks.  The story, which was touted by the network for many hours on broadcast and social media as a bombshell turned out to be factually incorrect and insignificant.  CNN's original report definitively stated that Don Jr. received access to secret Wikileaks information via email on Sept. 4, 2016.  In fact, that email was sent on Sept. 14, after the said documents were released to the public.  CNN pushed the fake story for hours, even after the email in question was made publicly available to disprove the reporting.  In a humiliating move, CNN decided to have one of the authors of the debunked story go on air to "correct" his reporting.

Yet more ammo for the 'fake news' critics.  We certainly understand the rush to be first in this business.  But the increasingly desperate attempts by an anti-Trump press to prove Russian collusion are leading to gaffes that make readers question even legitimate stories.

Another CNN "Russia Bombshell" Story Explodes in Their Faces.  Mere hours after CNN reported on an "exclusive," alleging the Trump campaign received Wikileaks information before it was public, the story came crumbling down with the Washington Post reporting that the emailed information in question was already public before being emailed to the campaign.

WaPo: CNN Misreported WikiLeaks Providing Trump Access to Email Tranche.  Earlier today [12/8/2017], CNN said that Congressional investigators obtained an email that was sent last year to President Trump, Donald Trump Jr., and other senior company officials.  The email reportedly contained tools that would allow users to get an early look at the hacked information Wikileaks released during the last months of the 2016 election.  However, Washington Post reports that CNN got the email dates wrong, and the decryption key would've only led Trump officials to information that was already publicly available.  CNN says the email was sent on September 4, though WaPo says it was sent on September 14, a day after the documents in question were released.

CNN's Awful Week:  Lies, Meltdowns, Ratings Collapse, New Discrimination Suit.  Until CNN turned into a 24/7 RedBaitingAntiTrumpFakeNewsHateMachine, the left-wing network was in second place, beating MSNBC much more often than not.  So not only has CNN lost more than half of its year-over-year viewers, it has lost its bragging rights over its left-wing counterpart at MSNBC.  And things continue to get worse, primarily through unforced errors caused by CNN's blinding hate and rabid partisanship.  Without a doubt, CNN has just suffered through its worst week since those hilarious weeks back in June when CNN staffers had to be fired over hate-sprees against President Trump, and a barrage of firings occurred after the network was caught red-handed telling one audacious lie after another.

CNN's Undisclosed Ties To Fusion GPS.  CNN's reporting on the Trump-Russia dossier has left out at least one crucial fact:  the close ties between the network and the opposition research firm at the center of the dossier controversy.  CNN's reporting on the dossier, led by justice correspondent Evan Perez, has been favorable to the firm, Fusion GPS, and hyped the dossier's credibility.  Left out of Perez's reporting, which has relied largely on unnamed sources, is his personal closeness to Fusion GPS' operatives.  Fusion has repeatedly been described in Senate testimonies as a smear-for-hire operation that manufactures misleading or false media narratives for its clients.

Report Reveals CNN's Close Ties to Trump-Smearing Firm Fusion GPS.  As more details emerge about the murky swamp that funded Fusion GPS's work on the salacious Trump dossier, a new report reveals CNN's own ties to the smear-for-hire firm.  CNN's justice correspondent Evan Perez, who has reported extensively on the Russia investigation and the Trump dossier, is close personal friends with Fusion GPS's founders, according to a report by the Daily Caller.

Three More Trump/Russia 'Bombshells' Turn Out To Be Duds.  Over the weekend, CNN offered up a shocking revelation:  Russia had enlisted Pikachu and his Pokemon pals in its effort to get Donald Trump elected president.  Well, not really.  It was just the latest nonstory whipped up by the Trump-hating press.

CNN Continues to Solidify Its Place Atop the Fake News Dung Heap.  In the ongoing battle between President Trump and the always hostile mainstream media, CNN has taken center stage as either the fight's biggest victim or its most egregious offender, depending on one's perspective.  I vote the latter. [...] This isn't journalism, it's a slander party.

CNN throws in the towel on fake Russian news.  CNN has dismantled its vaunted Trump-colluded-with-the-Russians investigative unit in a wretched concession to reality.  The only thing the unit found was an empty well for stories, surrounded by a crust of fake news.  The whole caper damaged the network's credibility, and the public just wasn't buying it anymore.  So the whole unit had to go.  What a shabby end to what the network had put so much stock in in the heady days of trying to oust President Trump just as he had taken office.

CNN Pulled Investigative Team Off Trump-Russia Coverage.  CNN executives explicitly told their investigative team to stop looking into potential ties between the Trump administration and Russia following a series of high profile reporting errors led that to the resignation of three journalists in June.  Executives transferred all reporting duties associated with the Trump-Russia narrative to CNN's Washington, D.C. team in the wake of a retracted June report, members of the CNN staff told The New York Times.  The report in question was removed from CNN's website after the network admitted it could not stand by information that tied then Trump advisor Anthony Scaramucci to a Russian investment bank under Senate sanctions.

Something Very Odd In That "CNN Crew Rescuing Man in Truck" Video.  Perhaps you might have seen the story of Drew Griffin from CNN and a spontaneous, and serendipitous, CNN crew's rescue of a Texas man who drove his truck into a canal.  Kudos for CNN being in the right place at the right time and doing the right thing etc.  CNN has been playing up the video all day as an act of spontaneous CNN bravery in a moment of emergency and crisis.  High-fives and back-pats all around.  [Video clip]  Except someone noticed something weird about it.  Either there's another guy in the video and the footage makes it seem weird and conflated, or Drew Griffin had time to change clothes between the moment the man drove into the canal and the moment Griffin "rescued" him.

CNN: From Fake News to Fudging Ratings?  CNN has reacted very badly to the political rise of President Trump, promulgating fake news and presenting an echo chamber of negative commentary.  Now, the struggling news channel appears to be trying to manipulate the ratings.  Even if it's not the originator of the Fake News model that now largely defines the MSM, CNN has certainly perfected it.

CNN: 'Ordinary People Are 'White Supremacists by Default'.  On Thursday [8/24/2017], CNN's John Blake published a story blaming "ordinary people" for making Charlottesville possible, and quoting a history professor who called such people "white supremacists by default."  "We are a country with a few million passionate white supremacists — and tens of millions of white supremacists by default," Mark Naison, a political activist and history professor at Fordham University in New York City, told CNN.  "You have to have millions of people who are willing to be bystanders, who push aside evidence of racism, Islamophobia, or sexism.  You can't have one without the other."  Blake, the CNN reporter, paraphrased activists like Naison saying "the tragedy that took place in Charlottesville this month could not have occurred without the tacit acceptance of millions of ordinary, law-abiding Americans who helped create such a radically explosive climate."

The Editor says...
No, all it takes is a few inflammatory cable TV  news  propaganda channels to "create such a radically explosive climate."

Provocateur Journalism.  When a news organization reports an impending weather event based on forecasts from the National Weather Service, or warns of potential seismic activity anticipated by the U.S. Geological Survey, or alerts the public concerning an infectious-disease outbreak being tracked by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, no one questions the news organization's motives, because the underlying information is factual and derived from a reliable, nonpartisan, and authoritative source.  CNN presents itself as a news organization, yet today [8/17/2017] it posted a dubious story titled "Here are all the active hate groups where you live," based entirely on data from the Southern Poverty Law Center.  The SPLC is not the equivalent of the National Weather Service, the USGS, or CDC, to put it mildly.  It is risible for CNN to recite SPLC data uncritically, with no additional validation, as a credible list of "domestic hate groups," let alone to describe SPLC's data as "widely accepted."

Charlottesville, Barcelona, and the Left's Nostalgia for Nazism.  Within minutes of the announcement of the vehicular terror attack in Barcelona, Jim Sciutto and Wolf Blitzer of CNN were opining that the horrifying events in Spain may have been inspired by (i.e. were a copycat of) Charlottesville.  The implications of this comparison are not only wrong-headed, they are reactionary and dangerous to the American public and the world. [...] It isn't because of neo-Nazis or the KKK that it's been decades since any of us has walked onto an airplane or entered a concert or museum without being examined or x-rayed, that our daily lives have not been the same.

Jim Acosta is exactly why cameras were kept out of WH briefings.  When the White House stopped allowing cameras in the press briefings, no one was more vociferous against the move than CNN's Jim Acosta.  He went on an unceasing tirade against the practice.  This week he proved why he ranted against it — and why the White House may have been smart to institute the practice.  It wasn't really about transparency.  It was about Jim Acosta being able to make the briefings about himself and not the president.  An exchange this week between Acosta and presidential adviser Stephen Miller proved why then-press secretary Sean Spicer was right to make the move.

CNN's Jim Acosta Read The Statue Of Liberty Poem, Had A Meltdown When Someone Suggested Immigrants Be Able To Read It, Too.  Jim Acosta took a rhetorical beating today [8/2/2017].  Over the past couple of months he's been one of the loudest voices grousing about the Trump administration's policy of conducting off-camera press briefings.  Listening to him, a person might have been under the impression that the First Amendment features a clause granting senior White House correspondents from CNN the right to grandstand on national TV every day.  Acosta happens to be one of the strongest arguments for keeping daily briefings off camera.  Most often these exchanges are excruciatingly uninformative, pitting dishonest administration officials against crusading journalists who offer ideological statements in the form of pretend questions.

Acosta Pulls the Media's Mask Off.  It is impossible to overstate the partisan jackassery of CNN, which is at once a product of the cynical, ratings-driven scumbaggery of its head Jeff Zucker and the pretentious liberalism of its "reporters," almost all of whom come from Democratic circles.  What an astonishing collection of frauds.  With their anchormanish baritones, they try to hoodwink viewers into thinking they are "serious" journalists.  But they are all just liberal activists playing reporters on TV.  Jake Tapper was a Dem staffer.  So was Jim Sciutto.  Christiane Amanpour, last heard lecturing journalists on the need to drop "neutrality" in its coverage of Trump, is married to former Clinton staffer James Rubin.  And the list goes on and on.  Out of this ethos came Jim Acosta, who, thanks to Trump, has justly become the face of fake news.

CNN's Jake Tapper Claims 'Every Intelligence Expert' Under Trump, Obama Affirms Russia Interference.  During yesterday's [7/23/2017] State of the Union program on CNN, host Jake Tapper wildly asserted that "every intelligence expert, both under the Obama administration and under the Trump administration" agrees with the assessment that Russia attempted to interfere in the 2016 presidential election.  Tapper did not explain how he concluded that "every intelligence expert, both under the Obama administration and under the Trump administration" made such an assessment.

CNN's Jake Tapper Caught Misstating His Background on Live Television.  Jake Tapper, a CNN anchor, has been caught misstating his background on live television on Sunday [7/23/2017].  During an interview with President Donald J. Trump's new White House Communications Director Anthony Scaramucci, Tapper inflated his background to make it seem as though he was more in touch with people with working- and middle-class beginnings than he really is.

Americans Protest 'Very Fake News' CNN Outside of Atlanta Headquarters.  More than 150 protesters charged the CNN headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia to share their disgust with the network's peddling of "fake news" against President Trump's administration.

How CNN took on President Trump and lost.  [Scroll down]  [Jeff] Zucker was not a journalism guy, but he understood numbers.  He lived and died by them.  His philosophy at CNN was to stay on anything that its viewers were watching whether it was a missing Malaysian plane or Trump.  CNN's old strategy of "flooding the zone" with meaningless non-coverage of a breaking event was merged with Zucker's own preference for reality television to create a constant coverage circus.  Hiring a ton of reporters from across the spectrum, from a New York Times Pulitzer Prize winner to the BuzzFeed trolls, would flood the zone with Trump scandals.  CNN would have the most Trump scandals and the most viewers.  It was a great strategy for manufacturing a whole bunch of fake news scandals.  And things that don't even qualify as fake news.  Like wondering whether Trump is afraid of stairs.

Legal Experts:  CNN Committed Multiple Felonies.  So arrogant and self-righteous have liberal news outlets become, that they now take it upon themselves to hunt down and blackmail private citizens who dare to mock theor pomposity or make fun of the elf-appointed hall monitors of news.  Blackmail is a harsh term, but it applies to what CNN did to the Reddit user who made the now infamous wrestling GIF showing Trump pummeling an opponent with a CNN logo for a head.

Thanks CNN! Worst media moments of the week.  Being biased is one thing.  Threatening online anonymity another.  That led to even The New York Times trying to explain how such online battles evolve.  "Remarkably, the CNN episode has managed to unite the notoriously fractious right-wing meme community under a common cause."  Posters have revealed home addresses and more from several CNN staffers in response and have claimed they will keep fighting.  The network probably wishes the whole thing would just go away.  The online community isn't likely to let that happen.

The Long List of Lies.  Would it be possible to list all the lies CNN tells?  The network fed questions to Hillary Clinton prior to debates.  And that was when Clinton was fighting Bernie "I'm a Loser" Sanders.  She still couldn't get by that imbecile without cheating.  Next, CNN twisted polls to make the Clinton camp believe Hillary Clinton was a rock star.  That didn't end well.  More recently, CNN buried the truth of terror attacks, hiding their Muslim connection.  In one such incident, the attacker was Muslim, shouted, "Allahu akbar," yet CNN called the guy a Canadian and buried the story under a piece about The Bachelor.

CNN Admits in 30th Paragraph that Trump was Right about Intel Agencies' Assessment on Russia.  CNN, far from a neutral news source, wrote a very long piece on President Trump's relationship with the country's intelligence agencies.  However, they buried the truth that the liberal media overestimated how many intelligence agencies believed the Russian government meddled in the 2016 election.  Where did they admit the truth?  In the 3oth and 31st paragraphs.

CNN's Zucker doesn't know his Dumpster's on fire.  CNN is a Dumpster on fire, but its boss is clueless.  Jeff Zucker's background is broadcast TV, a world of sitcoms, dramas, and reality shows.  He fails to realize that what he saw as small mistakes — the Russian dossier story, the false preview of Comey's testimony, and the retracted story about Scaramucci being investigated — were major problems.  None of CNN's competitors on TV had even one Fake News scandal that large.  CNN had three.

CNNBlackmail Is the Best Thing Since Trump Got Elected.  [T]he left isn't interested in logic and facts — and hasn't been for quite some time.  That was what James O'Keefe recently uncovered — not that we couldn't have guessed anyway — with his recent sting on CNN.  Here is an organization which affects the demeanor of a responsible, politically-neutral, internationally-respected news outlet with reporters and newscasters who look exactly like real ones on grown up TV channels.  But underneath, its entire raison d'etre and business model is churning out leftist fake news propaganda.  If conservative media outlets like Breitbart took the same liberties with the truth as leftist media outlets like CNN (and Vox and Slate and Salon and Huffpost and the rest...) they would be crucified.

A Weeks Worth of CNN's Russian Narrative Destroyed in a Minute.  For an entire week CNN has been running an ongoing story, based on a single source, about President Trump not going to confront Vladimir Putin about interference in the 2016 election.

CNN's Jim Acosta Busted for Fake News in Failed Attempt to Slam Trump.  NN's Jim Acosta accused President Donald Trump of "fake news" on Thursday for claiming that "three of four" intelligence agencies had identified Russia as the culprit in hacking during the 2016 presidential election — but the president was right, and Acosta was wrong.  Last week, the New York Times was forced to issue a correction, admitting that "17 intelligence agencies" had not, in fact, accused Russia, as Hillary Clinton had once claimed.

CNN sees its TV viewers in June collapse after having its "fake news" propaganda exposed.  The media giant saw its viewership numbers take a big hit in June after having its "fake news" reporting exposed in a variety of scandals, from Project Veritas videos, to made up Russia-collusion news, and even Trump body slamming the network via twitter.

CNN Threatens To Expose Non Compliant Citizen for Thinking Wrong Thoughts.  In an article identifying the originating source of the wrestling gif tweeted last week by President Donald Trump, CNN says they'll keep his name private so long as the person remains compliant to the media thought police.  The direct threat is:  "CNN reserves the right to publish his identity should any of that change." [...] Got that comrades?  Failure to remain a compliant citizen may render you subject to targeting by CNN corporate media.  Worth remembering.  CNN has instituted a multi-level corporate approval process for all media articles.  That means everyone within the media organization from top tier executives through legal departments and editors approved of this statement.

Media errors give Trump fresh ammunition.  A string of high-profile corrections and retractions by major news organizations on stories about President Trump or his allies have fueled more allegations of bias in the mainstream press.  The relationship between Trump and the news media regularly hits new lows, with insults flying between the two camps and reporters warning that the president is inciting violence against journalists.  But Trump's allies on the right believe the president's claims that the mainstream media is "fake news" have been bolstered by recent missteps.  They point to recent admissions from top news outlets — including CNN, the New York Times and the Associated Press — that bombshell stories were either overcooked or included incorrect details.

CNN's Fake News Machine.  In April, media types were crowing that CNN had brought in Eric Lichtblau who had been, in the Washington Post's words, at "the forefront of the New York Times's reporting on the relationship between the Trump presidential campaign and Russia."  It was "an investment in investigative reporting and the sprawling Russia story".  It didn't take long for the investigative investment to sprawl badly.  Lichtblau has resigned from CNN in a growing scandal over a Fake News story about a Trump associate.  "Eric will guide our coverage and thinking," Lex Haris, executive editor of CNN Investigates, had boasted.  "And when he's onto a investigation, he'll still be reporting and writing too."  Not for long.  And Haris has joined Lichtblau on the unemployment line after the Fake News scandal.

CNN screws up — again.  We're told CNN flew into a panic on Friday [6/30/2017] after it accidentally aired a fake National Enquirer cover during Jake Tapper's broadcast.  Tapper did a segment on his "The Lead" show about Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski's claim that Donald Trump tried to blackmail them with a hit piece in the National Enquirer.  During the piece, it showed a cover from the tabloid, which seemed to be about a scandal involving GOP senator Ted Cruz and his wife, Heidi Cruz.  Unfortunately, the cover is — literally — fake news.  The cover — which has the headline "Heidi Cruz:  Betrayed by Cheating Husband!" and promised details on a "sordid threesome, sleazy love letters and sensational photo proof — has never appeared on the National Enquirer, according to sources at the magazine.

Seniors Group Files FCC Complaint Against Very Fake News CNN.  The Association of Mature American Citizens (AMAC), the leading conservative seniors' organization in the country, filed a complaint with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Thursday [6/29/2017] over CNN's reporting on Russian hacking.  In the light of hidden camera videos from James O'Keefe's Project Veritas showing a CNN producer calling the narrative "bulls***," and CNN Contributor Van Jones's characterization of the Russia "collusion" story as a "nothing burger," AMAC has brought a complaint under FCC regulations against the knowing broadcast of false information.

CNN's Latest Retraction Is Just the Tip of the Fake News Iceberg.  Even the best reporters make serious mistakes.  When that happens, as it will, it's best to take responsibility and move on, as CNN did in this case.  Certainly this decisive action taken in response to a serious problem is a great start.  But taking responsibility for just one of the many flawed stories CNN has been pushing is nowhere near sufficient a response to the institutional problems plaguing the media outlet.  The serious problems with CNN's approach to the Russia-Trump collusion conspiracy are much deeper than just one story, go back many months, and involve several stories and larger themes that no one at CNN has bothered to sufficiently explain.  Let's look at a few of those stories.

The coming crash of the lawless media.  Sniping and rock-throwing at Donald Trump, a game that any number can play and nearly everybody does, has become a game with no rules and no referees, and worse, no editors to restrain obstreperous children breaking up the furniture.  CNN, once a fairly reliable source of news, with a weakness for trivia and given to peddling old news as the new thing, is now an inviting target for imaginative libel lawyers.  Three of its most prominent editors and "producers" were sacked this week after the network was forced to retract and apologize for a story it made up about a condant of President Trump, that he and his hedge fund was being investigated by the U.S. Senate for colluding with the Russians for nefarious purpose.

Joe Scarborough Calls President Trump 'Greatest Liar That's Ever Sat In The White House'.  MSNBC "Morning Joe" co-hosts Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski bashed President Donald Trump Wednesday, calling him worse than former President Richard Nixon and the "greatest liar that's ever sat in the white house."  Scarborough played a clip of Brian Karem, executive editor of The Sentinel Newspapers, at Tuesday's [6/27/2017] White House briefing challenging Deputy Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders, saying her criticism of the media was inflaming the American people.  Sanders responded at the briefing by citing a debunked Washington Post story stating reporters were not being thorough enough in their critiques of the president.

The Editor says...
Mr. Scarborough should spend some time reading my partial catalog of Obama's lies.

CNN faced $100M lawsuit over botched Russia story.  The specter of a $100 million libel suit scared CNN into retracting a poorly reported story that slimed an ally of President Trump's — and forcing out the staffers responsible for it, The [New York] Post has learned.  The cable network's coverage of Trump transition-team member Anthony Scaramucci came amid federal scrutiny of corporate parent Time Warner's pending purchase by AT&T — and the widespread belief among media execs that CNN President Jeff Zucker can't survive a merger.  CNN immediately caved after Scaramucci, a financier and frequent network guest, cried foul and threatened to take legal action, sources said Tuesday.

CNN Just Got Hit by a Massive Truth Bomb — The Facts of Life Are Conservative.  As a fellow human being I feel sorry for the poor guy caught on camera by Project Veritas admitting this stuff — because he's probably going to lose his job.  But [...] It just seems to me that one of the most basic, entry-level precepts that any serious news organization ought to be observe — and that CNN most patently never has observed, or not for a very, very long time — is this:  Facts are sacred.  The truth always makes the best story.

CNN Producer Admits Witch Hunt Against Trump.  CNN producer John Bonifield made the brazen admission of the network's absence of journalistic bona fides to an undercover reporter from ACORN-slayer James O'Keefe's investigative nonprofit, Project Veritas.  "He not only gave us a tour of CNN's main newsroom, he gave us a window into the editorial bias and anti-Trump agenda of the organization," O'Keefe says as he narrates the video.  Project Veritas is touting the video as the first installment in a multi-part investigation the group calls "American Pravda."

Three journalists quit CNN in fallout from retracted Russia story.  Three CNN journalists who worked on a now-retracted story about Russia and a top Trump adviser are leaving the network.  CNN is casting their departure as resignations in the wake of the fiasco, but the network has come under substantial criticism since apologizing for the story.  The move would also help CNN's legal position in case of a lawsuit.  Anthony Scaramucci, the Trump adviser who is the target of the story, told me that he has no plans to sue.  He said he has accepted CNN's apology and wants to move on.  But Scaramucci also told me in an earlier interview, "I was disappointed the story was published.  It was a lie."

White House:  CNN 'a Disgrace to All of Media, to All of Journalism'.  Deputy Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders told the White House Press Corps on Tuesday [6/27/2017] that CNN was "a disgrace to journalism."  Sanders's remarks came after CNN retracted a "fake news" story over the weekend alleging links between a member of President Donald Trump's transition team and a Russian firm, and after an exposé on Monday [6/26/2017] by James O'Keefe's Project Veritas showed a CNN producer admitting the Russia story was [false].

How CNN's Fake News Machine Ran.  The men behind the disaster were no lightweights.  Thomas Frank had been nominated for a Pulitzer.  Eric Lichtblau had shared a Pulitzer for bashing the Bush administration over, of all things, surveillance.  Their names were all over CNN hit pieces tying to tie Trump to an impeachable Russian scandal.  That was what they had been hired for.  CNN claimed that Lichtblau had been "reporting on Comey for more than a decade."  And Frank was busy rolling out fresh grist for the Trump-Russia mill.  One Frank article on CNN breathlessly claimed, "One week, three more Trump-Russia connections."  CNN was riding the impeachment train to Moscow.  And yet Lichtblau's tenure at CNN quickly became troubled.

CNN Exposed:  Producer Admits Anti-Trump Obsession Without 'Any Giant Proof'.  The secret-taping squad at Project Veritas are making sure CNN has a bad public-relations week.  On the heels of three journalists resigning over an unsubstantiated online report on Russia and Trump, CNN Health producer John Bonifield is caught on tape admitting that CNN is producing news for liberals, and that talking about "cutesy little ethics" is "adorable" when cable news is a "business."  PV says the conversations were taped in June.  Liberal journalists usually respond to PV videos in two ways.  First, they charge the videos are "deceptively edited," so somehow what the target says doesn't mean anything; and second, they absolutely fail to ask their own questions and follow up.  See last year's tapes on Democratic activists admitting they were stoking violence at Trump rallies and so on.

Heads Are Bouncing On The Floor At CNN Headquarters.  Yesterday [6/25/2017], CNN pulled what was promoted as a major story from the its website, disabled all leaks to the story, and issued an apology to the subject, Trump adviser Anthony Scaramucci.  The ostensible reason was that the story failed to meet CNN's editorial standards... which tells you all you need to know about how bad the story was.  BuzzFeed reported that CNN honcho Jeff Zucker was personally leading the investigation, an act that can only be interpreted as desperately trying to head off a multi-million dollar lawsuit.

American Pravda:  CNN.  Project Veritas has released a video of CNN Producer John Bonifield who was caught on hidden-camera admitting that there is no proof to CNN's Russia narrative. [...] According to the CNN Producer, business is booming.  "Trump is good for business right now," he concluded.  Bonifield further goes on to explain that the instructions come straight from the top, citing the CEO, Jeff Zucker: [...]

CNN Producer Spills All on Russia Fake News.  A veteran CNN producer has spilled the beans, on camera, about the fake news network's intentional obsession with the "Trump-Russia" narrative.  James O'Keefe, founder of Project Veritas, has released a video in which CNN producer John Bonifield describes the network's orders to relentlessly push the "Trump-Russia" story, [...] The American people have had enough of the fake news media lying about our president, and now CNN has some explaining to do.

Undercover Video:  CNN Producer Admits Russia Story was Manufactured For Ratings.  Project Veritas and James O'Keefe has produced another explosive undercover story showcasing CNN producers who admit the Trump-Russia story is manufactured and promoted for ratings by the network.

Three CNN Employees Resign Over Retracted Story on Russia Ties.  Three CNN employees have handed in their resignations over a retracted story linking President Trump to Russia, the network announced Monday [6/26/2017].  Thomas Frank, who wrote the story in question; Eric Lichtblau, an editor in the unit; and Lex Haris, who oversaw the unit, have all left CNN.  "In the aftermath of the retraction of a story published on CNN.com, CNN has accepted the resignation of the employees involved in the story's publication," a network spokesperson said in a statement Monday [6/26/2017].

Three Employees Resign from CNN Amid Very Fake News Scandal.  Three CNN employees have resigned amid the network's very fake news scandal in which it was forced to retract a hit piece on President Donald Trump and his associates.  "CNN said Monday [6/26/2017] that three journalists, including the executive editor in charge of a new investigative unit, have resigned after the publication of a Russia-related article that was retracted," CNN's Brian Stelter reported late Monday.  "Thomas Frank, who wrote the story in question; Eric Lichtblau, an editor in the unit; and Lex Haris, who oversaw the unit, have all left CNN."

Very Fake News Scandal Consumes CNN as Jeff Zucker, Network Flack Refuse to Comment on Russia Retraction to Own Network.  The scandal surrounding CNN's mishandling of a very fake news hit piece on President Donald Trump and his associates grows bigger on Sunday night [6/25/2017] as the network's president Jeff Zucker and public relations team are refusing to comment to anyone — even to CNN media reporter Brian Stelter — about what happened.  Stelter, in his Sunday evening [6/25/2017] newsletter named for the television program he hosts[,] Reliable Sources, credited a Breitbart News investigation with forcing what he admitted is an embarrassing retraction for his employer CNN.

CNN Has to Completely Retract a Major Anti-Trump Story.  CNN, you will recall, ran a major story about James Comey claiming that Comey would contradict the President on whether the President is being investigated.  They went wall to wall with the coverage of that story.  Then James Comey did not contradict the President.  CNN had to walk it all back.  Now they have done it again.  On June 22, CNN ran a story claiming that Anthony Scaramucci had dealings with a Russian investment group.

CNN Journalist Angrily Tweets Trump Saying There's No Fake News — Gets FLOODED With Examples.  Chris Cillizza used to write for the Washington Post, now he works for CNN.  Yesterday [6/13/2017] while responding to a Trump tweet, he defiantly claimed there is no fake news.  He probably wasn't prepared for the response he got.

Trump Supporters Plan Protest at CNN Headquarters in Atlanta to Decry Fake News.  Debbie Dooley of Main Street Patriots is hoping hundreds will gather at the headquarters of CNN in Atlanta on Saturday to protest what its members consider fake news being produced by the giant media corporation.  Specifically, Dooley told Breitbart News that they object to the fake news being put out about President Donald Trump.  "We're encouraging people to come out and support our president," said Dooley, one of 22 national co-founders of the Tea Party and co-founder of Main Street Patriots.  "And to condemn the extreme biased coverage at CNN."

CNN Caught Staging Fake News Scene.  CNN was caught staging news in a video captured by citizen journalist, who posted the footage to his Twitter account @markantro.  Becky Anderson of CNN is seen in London handing props to a "peace group."  This footage was then passed off as real news by CNN.

Watch as fake news created by CNN to confirm narrative of 'good Muslims'.  Whenever Muslims act out the violence against infidels that Islamic scripture requires, the left-wing media swing into action to create and reinforce a contrasting narrative:  that most Muslims condemn and fight such attacks. [...] Because the actual facts on the ground do not support the benign view of Muslims as overwhelmingly hostile to terrorists and committed to peaceful coexistence, it is necessary to create (not simply report) events that confirm the media narrative.  CNN has just been caught creating a fake news event to support its narrative, and its efforts were rewarded with pick-ups by the BBC and the AP, among others.  In this two-minute video, CNN puts together a handful of people, carrying pre-printed signs (no spontaneity involved), and arranges them before the camera to look like a substantial crowd.  The elevated stage is a nice touch, confirming the professional expertise brought to bear in prepping this scene for the cameras.

Fake News — CNN's Marc Lamont Hill:  Conservatives Start Violent Campus Riots, Too.  CNN's Marc Lamont Hill, who is also a professor at Morehouse College, claimed that right-wing students incite riots on college campuses while discussing the Berkeley riots left-wing students over the appearance of Breitbart News' MILO.

CNN Reporter Compares Trump To Hitler While Her Boss Buys Obama Photos.  In the weeks after Donald Trump won the election, CNN chief Jeff Zucker watched as one of his employees compared the new president to Adolf Hitler.  At a White House press conference Thursday [2/16/2017], Trump declared that he was changing his moniker for the network from "fake news" to "very fake news."  There's been a ton of well-publicized drama between the two camps. [...] You may think Trump is too harsh on CNN.  But take a look at how the network treated Trump back in November.

Hospital CEO Wins Major Court Victory After Accusing CNN of False Reporting.  Those who accuse CNN and other mainstream media outlets of "fake news" will probably revel in a recent decision by a federal judge in Atlanta, Georgia.  While Judge Orinda Evans didn't all out declare that CNN was peddling in falsehoods, she did take aim at the network in an initial judgment in favor of a former hospital CEO who sued CNN accusing them of purposely skewing statistics to reflect poorly on a West Palm Beach hospital.  Judge Evans didn't mince words in her 18-page order allowing the case to move forward, and dismissing CNN's attempt to get it thrown out of court.

Yes, CNN IS Fake News.  The problem is this:  CNN — like the New York Times, like the network news departments at NBC and ABC and CBS — is virtually the definition of Fake News, a phrase made up by the left to attack Trump but which blew up in their faces like a trick cigar when it turned out everyone knows what liars they've been for the past sixteen years at least.  This is not even a question of the almost ceaseless series of mistakes, distortions and obfuscations that our leftist news media, in their hysterical rage against political reality, have committed since the election of Donald Trump to the presidency.  These errors and lies — which include cover-ups of Islamic extremism, lies about right-wing websites, and suspiciously incendiary "mistakes" about the White House — are being ably catalogued by the mighty and terrible John Nolte over at the Daily Wire.

Stunning Fake News — CNN Promotes Conspiracy Theory That Milo Organized Berkeley Protests Against Himself.  CNN has continued to lead the way in manufactured news cycles through the past two years.  However, last night on Don Lemon's show they took fake news broadcasting to new levels of ridiculousness.  During a segment with Robert Reich, Don Lemon and Reich promoted a conspiracy theory that Milo Yiannopoulous actually manufactured the Berkeley protests in an effort to shut down his own speech:  [Video clip]

CNN Is Now Least Trusted News Network Among Viewers.  A recent poll of cable news network viewers found that CNN's regular audience is far more skeptical of the political news they receive than Fox News fans.

Study: CNN least trusted among likely voters.  CNN is less trusted by likely voters than its competitors at MSNBC and Fox News, according to a new study.  The study, conducted by Rasmussen Reports, said that 75 percent of likely voters tend to watch at least some cable news per week to keep up with politics.  Among that group, 42 percent watch Fox News, 35 percent watch CNN, and 19 percent watch MSNBC.  However, the poll said a larger portion of Fox News and MSNBC viewers trust those networks.

CNN still pushing fake story about Muslim attacked by Trumpsters.  CNN is the poster child for media bias and once again they don't disappoint. [...] This woman claimed that the men drove up, got out and attacked her.  That one was wearing a Trump 'Make America Great Again' cap and they beat her and robbed her, stealing her belongings and hijab.  She also said they hurled racial slurs at her.  She didn't realize there were cameras there and that they prove it never happened.  There were no other witnesses and it was labeled the hoax that it was.

Lemon: CNN 'Sets the Standard for Integrity'.  Last Tuesday, CNN's Don Lemon described his employer as the pinnacle of journalistic integrity during a news segment ostensibly examining pervasive left-wing political bias in the news media.  "I have to say that, I work for this news organization and I think that it sets the standard for integrity," said Lemon of his employer. [...] Lemon also denied that his former CNN colleague and current Democratic National Committee Interim Chair Donna Brazile had provided questions to Clinton's campaign in advance of CNN-hosted presidential debates.

CNN Caught Red-Handed Telling [a] Blatant Lie About Trump.  CNN was caught lying about comments GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump made at a campaign rally in Colorado over the weekend.  The original CNN article was titled, "Trump, skeptical of mail-in balloting, encourages voting more than once if necessary."

Mediaite Catches CNN Falsely Claiming Trump Told Audience to Vote Multiple Times.  Upon reviewing CNN's on-air coverage of Trump's Colorado rally at the center of these false claims, the network actually aired live the entirety of Trump's comments on Sunday [10/30/2016] about voting in the Centennial State.  Somehow, the CNN Politics team still published the butchered and erroneous Trump quote.  I've provided video below of Trump's full comments that CNN's reporters didn't appear initially interested in following.  The headline has also been changed to include the acknowledgement that this blog has been updated.

Trump's Right:  The Media Is Rigged.  On Oct. 16 on his CNN show "Reliable Sources," host Brian Stelter took the denial of liberal media bias to a new level.  In the wake of hundreds of emails underlining media-Democrat collusion, he insisted that every American should deny the evidence:  "In Trump's world, journalists are really just (Hillary) Clinton campaign workers in disguise, collaborating with her in an attempt to rig the election.  This is not just false.  It's ludicrous, and it's damaging."  On what planet does this man live?  Even by Clinton News Network standards, this is ridiculous.

CNN anchor warns: 'Illegal' for you to look at WikiLeaks.  WikiLeaks on Sunday called attention to remarks made by CNN anchor Chris Cuomo in which he appeared to warn viewers that it was "illegal" for those outside of the media to look at emails from Hillary Clinton's campaign chairman.

Special note to regular readers of akdart.com:
It is illegal for you to watch CNN or MSNBC.

CNN needs to stop deceptively editing videos.  Creating a narrative through deception won't help victims or change the minds of skeptics.  When people see the media lying to them, it makes it difficult to believe the narrative being crafted.  Take the recent examples of CNN.  The network has now twice edited videos to create alternate narratives in regards to the recent shootings of two different black men by cops.  Just this week, the pro-police group Blue Lives Matter charged that the network deceptively edited video of the police shooting of Keith Lamont Scott.  The full video, taken by his wife Rakeyia, featured officers repeatedly telling Scott to "drop the gun."  In the video aired on CNN, no such demands were shown.

CNN falsely adds 'racial' to Trump vetting comments.  CNN added the word "racial" to Donald Trump's Monday [9/19/2016] comments on terrorism and immigration and is running headlines reporting that the GOP presidential nominee spoke of using "racial profiling" to stop terrorism.  But a review of the transcript of Trump's comments to Fox News that CNN quoted shows that Trump never used the word "racial" in his comments to the network and only spoke of "profiling."

Update:
CNN's Burnett Admits Her Show Was Wrong to Add 'Racial' to Trump Profiling Comments.  In the midst of a heated but civil debate on CNN Tuesday night, host Erin Burnett admitted on her eponymous show to Trump campaign manager Kellyanne Conway that her program should not have aired a chyron on Monday's show suggesting that Donald Trump was in favor of "racial" profiling.  Burnett was twice pressed by Conway on why her show made such an editorial error and so Burnett paused the debate to offer an explanation of regret.

CNN anti-Trump lie BUSTED on air!  If you imagine all the situations when the media reported on domestic and international matters of great importance where the you-got-the-story-backwards truth would apply, you would likely be occupied for the rest of your life and still not have identified every situation.

Trump: "We Are Going To Punch Through The Media".  Donald Trump hits the media, particularly CNN, 'the Clinton News Network,' at a campaign rally in Harrisburg, Penn.  Monday night [8/1/2016].  "We have a media that is so dishonest," Trump said.  "These are among the most dishonest people you will ever, ever meet."

CNN's Tom Foreman Caught Lying in Trump-Refugees 'Fact Check'.  In a segment that was billed as CNN's "fact check" of Donald Trump's anti-Hillary speech, CNN gave a demonstrably false presentation of U.S. immigration policy in an effort to undermine Trump's factually correct statements.  The segment was remarkable in that it not only revealed CNN's profound ignorance of federal immigration policy, but an examination of the segment's transcript also reveals that CNN ignored and blatantly distorted what Trump had actually said.  CNN's Tom Foreman accused Trump making a "false" statement about Hillary Clinton's refugee policy when Trump statement was, in fact, true.

CNN Asks Activist Behind Planned Parenthood Videos if He's a 'Violent Extremist'.  In an interview with the Center for Medicial Progress' David Daleiden, CNN's New Day host Alisyn Camerota asked the activist behind the undercover Planned Parenthood videos to respond to criticism he was a "violent extremist."  "Your critics — critics of your organization I should say — say that you're not journalists as you purport to be on your website, but rather you're violent extremists," Camerota said to Daleiden.

The Editor says...
The abortion "doctors" are tearing babies apart and selling the pieces, and the guy who goes undercover to document this practice is accused of being a "violent extremist."  That's a textbook case of liberal media bias.

CNN's Clinton Cash 'Fact-Check' Ends in Embarrassment for Cristina Alesci and Laurie Frankel.  CNN Money's "fact-checkers" Cristina Alesci and Laurie Frankel ended up with egg on their faces on Wednesday [6/22/2016] after they rated as "false" a well-established and proven Clinton Cash fact involving Hillary Clinton's State Dept. approving the transfer of 20 percent of U.S. uranium to the Russian government, as nine investors in the deal funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation.  Under the guise of "fact-checking" Donald Trump's Wednesday speech, Alesci and Frankel purported to verify whether "Clinton's State Department approved the transfer of 20% of America's uranium holdings to Russia while nine investors in the deal funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation."

CNN Caught Lying About Trump - Obama Does Back Gun Confiscation.  For the last two days CNN has been lying about Donald Trump in order to put itself in its favorite gear:  the Trifecta Gear that allows the left-wing network to, all at once, push gun control, protect Barack Obama, and attack a high-profile Republican as dishonest — in this case frontrunner Donald Trump.

CNN Photoshops Oregon Jihadist Shooter to "Fundamentally Transform" Him into a Caucasian Male.  Remember the Trayvon Martin case?  You know, the dude involved in burglary, PCP-like drug cocktails, and/or drug dealing who assaulted George Zimmerman and got capped for his trouble?  Remember how the media claimed there was a new race called "White Hispanics", a term invented "by The New York Times to describe Zimmerman, apparently in some kind of push for a white vs. Black narrative"?  Good times.  Well, the media is at it again, this time photoshopping the Black Jihadist Oregon shooter [...] to make him appear white.

White-black Oregon shooter
The Curious Case of Oregon Shooter Chris Harper-Mercer — A Social Media Profile Shaped, Modified and Deleted.  On the left is the selfie Christopher Mercer uploaded to his social media.  On the right is how CNN presented the same selfie in broadcast stories about him.  Why did CNN need to change the complexion (color) of their broadcast?  Why is no one showing pictures of mom, Laurel Margaret Harper[?]


Trump Reduces CNN To Outright Lying: Sanctuary Cities Don't Exist.  Because he's a left-wing propagandist working for a left-wing propaganda outlet, CNN New Day anchor Chris Cuomo told the world today that sanctuary cities don't exist.  The description is a "misnomer," Cuomo said.  "They are not safe havens," Cuomo added, "It's about how they follow the [immigration law] process."  With a straight face, Cuomo dropped this nuclear lie while doing what he never does to Democrats:  interrogating Michael Cohen, an advisor to Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump: [...]

Waco Police Claim Threats From Non-Existent Motorcycle Gangs.  [Scroll down]  To the contrary, the report factually stated in the first page that most sovereign citizens are nonviolent, and that it will focus only on the violent fringe within a fringe — the people it calls "sovereign citizen extremists," or SCEs.  CNN Lied.  The report describes their violence as "sporadic," and it does not expect its rate to rise, predicting instead that the violence will stay "at the same sporadic level" in 2015.  The author or authors add that most of the violence consists of "unplanned, reactive" clashes with police officers, not preplanned attacks.  CNN Lied.  Of course, a week after the CNN propaganda the narrative of dangerous "Right-Wing Extremists" had already been embedded with the help of a liberal media.  Ridiculously, the words "right wing" were never in the report in any shape or fashion.  CNN Lied.

CNN Correspondent Sanjay Gupta Allegedly Makes False Brain Surgery Claim.  CNN correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta, who served as a White House fellow before embarking on a career in journalism, has been accused of falsely claiming that he helped perform brain surgery on an eight-year-old while covering the April earthquake in Nepal.  The Global Press Journal reported Tuesday [7/7/2015] that the girl identified in the CNN report as having undergone a craniotomy at the hands of Gupta never actually received surgery.

CNN still running dubious right-wing vs. Muslim extremists statistic.  CNN aired a statistic Friday morning [6/19/2015] alleging that "right-wing extremism" is responsible for more deaths since Sept. 11, 2001, than "Muslim extremism."  The thing is:  The statistic is dubious.

CNN anchor Chris Cuomo: The First Amendment doesn't protect hate speech, you know.  This guy is a professional journalist.  And a Yale grad.  And a law-school grad.  But let's be fair.  If you polled the media, how many of them would agree?  Don't stomp Cuomo just because he's bold enough to say what the rest are thinking.

CNN, DHS and SPLC's Blame-Righty Hit Job.  The Department of Homeland Security refuses to release a report on "right-wing" terrorism that somehow found its way into CNN's hands last week during the farcical White House summit on Don't Say Islamic Extremism. [...] CNN splashed the big scoop on its website:  "DHS intelligence report warns of domestic right-wing terror threat."  The fear-mongering piece featured a huge map of 24 alleged acts of "violence by sovereign citizen extremists since 2010." [...] But a closer look at the rigging of that phony factoid simply confirms the malevolent intention of so-called objective journalists and "hate watch" groups to marginalize conservative political speech and dissent.  The CNN/MSNBC/SPLC smear job involved both the dishonest deflating of left-wing and jihadist incidents, and the dishonest inflating of "right-wing" incidents.

Political, Scientific Chicanery Underlies Global Warming Alarmism.  In her December 28 CNN article, "How Germany Banishes Climate Myths," German environment minister Barbara Hendricks argues that the climate policies enabled by her country and the EU as a whole have been an economic success.  This is nothing more than East German-style disinformation.  The reality is that Germany's so-called "Solar Valley" has become a mothballed industrial rust belt.  Nearly all solar energy manufacturers have closed their doors. [...] Hendricks' CNN article is just another example of the use of fraudulent PR spin to promote a desired political message while ignoring the realities of science and economics.

CNN Anchor: 'Our Rights Do Not Come From God'.  During a heated discussion over gay marriage, CNN morning Anchor Chris Cuomo opined that the unalienable rights endowed to all Americans do not come from God.  Cuomo was debating Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore on the constitutionality of same-sex marriage.  Near the end of the back-and-forth and after Moore argued that rights cannot be handed down by men, Cuomo blurted out:  "Our rights do not come from God, your honor, and you know that.  They come from man... That's your faith, that's my faith, but that's not our country.  Our laws come from collective agreement and compromise."  [Video clip]

CNN's Crowley Admits Obama Didn't Call Benghazi a Terror Attack.  On the May 19 broadcast of CNN's State of the Union, host Candy Crowley said that Obama was late in identifying the attacks in Benghazi as terrorism quite contrary to what she said during the Presidential debates late last year.

CNN Anchors Fake a Satellite Interview in the Same Parking Lot.  "Sorry, we're experiencing a delay in the broadcast while we both wait for this bus to go by."  Yes, those are all the same cars.  Apparently they thought we wouldn't notice because Nancy is on the right side of the screen, when in reality she is to Ashleigh Banfield's left.



Brian Williams

Truth-Challenged Brian Williams Skeptical of Someone Else's Claims.  Disgraced anchor Brian Williams, who has a history of not telling the truth, on Wednesday [3/22/2017] offered a skeptical take on the claim by a Republican Congressman that Donald Trump's aides were surveilled during the presidential transition.  Regarding the assertions made by Representative Devin Nunes, Williams explained in a doubting tone:  "[Nunes] says he is now in receipt of information.  It's intelligence information that he found alarming enough to go down to the White House and brief the President.  [This is] not traditionally the role of the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee."

Watch Brian Williams Lecture Us About Fake News With A Straight Face.  Does this man even realize that the sheer amount of irony he's putting out here is the mainstream media equivalent to smacking everyone who watches this clip in the face with a bag of rabid weasels?

Brian Williams complains about fake news — just 21 months after he lost his job on NBC Nightly News for telling made up stories.  Brian Williams has called out Donald Trump's transition team for spreading fake news stories.  Williams, who was suspended for six months and lost his spot as NBC Nightly News anchor for exaggerating stories about his time in Iraq and New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina, blasted the President-elect's team on MSNBC on Tuesday night [12/6/2016].  'Fake news played a role in this election and continues to find a wide audience,' the 57-year-old said.

12 Fake News Stories from the Mainstream Media.  [For example,] The adventures of Brian Williams:  Brian Williams' anchorman career at NBC News came to an end in 2015 after he was accused of lying about taking enemy fire while helicoptering into Iraq in 2003.  The accusation came from soldiers who were aboard the helicopter.  Williams told the story repeatedly, over a span of years, before he was called out.  NBC executives recalled having a great deal of difficulty getting Williams to admit he lied, and offer an unqualified apology.  Amazingly, Williams still has a career in broadcast journalism.

Brian Williams Will Receive Evening Show on MSNBC.  Despite his fall from prominence due to serial lying and removal from the anchor desk of NBC Nightly News, current MSNBC breaking news anchor Brian Williams will be given another chance to rein over a daily news program when, according to CNN's Brian Stelter, MSNBC awards him a half-hour show at 11:00 p.m. at a date to be determined.

Disgraced Brian Williams Seeks 'Redemption' at MSNBC: 'Bad Precedent for Journalism'.  Brian Williams, who spent 10 years as the anchor and managing editor of the NBC Nightly News weekday program, and MSNBC, a cable affiliate known for its liberal slant and perpetually low ratings, are combining their forces in an effort to improve their standing in the cable news battle during the 2016 presidential contest.

Seriously? Brian Williams Proclaims to Be the 'Purveyor of Truth and Justice'.  A totally clueless Brian Williams on Monday night [2/1/2016] warned MSNBC viewers to not fall for false information as Iowa caucus results rolled in.  The man who became known for spinning vast numbers of falsehoods while anchor at NBC News ominously began, "There's going to be some data floating around, especially the internet tonight."  He continued, "The first wave of that data is notoriously suspect.  So, don't believe everything you see and hear tonight."  With no self-awareness, Williams proclaimed, "We hopefully will be the purveyors of truth and justice here."

The Editor says...
The internet is gradually replacing television as the primary national news medium in America, and the broadcast networks are very aware of it.  (The evidence of this trend is abundant:  Internet news and opinion sites are replete with advertising.  If nobody looked for local and national news on the internet, there would be few advertisers.)  Over the next few years, unless the internet is strangled by Big Government, the trend will continue.  The over-the-air broadcasters (and networks) are somewhat jealous of their internet competitors, which is why every TV station has a web site.  Even so, it isn't realistic to claim that the viewers can't believe anything they hear about an election except what they hear on television.

MSNBC cuts back Katrina anniversary coverage to avoid awkward references.  MSNBC has cut back its coverage of the 10th anniversary of Hurricane Katrina to avert awkward references to outlandish claims Brian Williams made about his time in New Orleans, it is reported.  Williams, 56, asserted in a 2006 interview that he had seen a 'face-down' dead body float past his hotel window in the Louisiana city's French Quarter in the aftermath of Katrina in September 2005.

Brian Williams Scandal Shows Power of Social Media.  The soldiers who prompted Brian Williams's fall from one of the most powerful jobs in the media had first tried to blow the whistle on him in 2003.  But that was before the Internet became ubiquitous.  And so, like most people who had a problem with the news, the soldiers had few options.

Why NBC cut Brian Williams loose as anchor — and really had no choice.  In the end, NBC simply could not bring Brian Williams back to the anchor chair.  It wasn't just that he had irreparably tarnished his own credibility, and that of his network, by fabricating a tale of Iraq War bravery.  It was that the rank and file of his own news division was vehemently opposed to Williams returning to "NBC Nightly News."

Quotes of the day.  The scandals that derailed the career of NBC News anchor Brian Williams are of the pathetic and pathological kind.  Obviously, Williams is not to be trusted.  Nevertheless, other than the Katrina fairytales that were obviously meant to damage President Bush, all of his lies were self-aggrandizing resume-enhancers.

When elites lie without much consequence, the public follows their examples.  [Scroll down]  Few question network anchor newsreaders.  In Williams's case his "aw shucks" mellifluous shtick and understated dramatics were his versions of hexameters and type scenes, and so made his lying a bit easier to swallow.  After his brief suspension, Williams might even return to his multimillion-dollar per year perch, with the understanding that he can restore NBC ratings and profitability, and do that with occasional exaggeration rather than outright making up stuff.  And why not lie, when NBC itself doctors 911 tapes to confirm that George Zimmerman was a racist?

Brian Williams Wants His Job Back Now, but NBC Isn't So Sure.  The trial of Brian Williams is not quite over, and the question of whether he'll be banished or welcomed back is far from settled.  Despite rumors that NBC News has completed its reportedly damning internal review of the suspended Nightly News anchor's tall tales about his adventures in journalism, the probe isn't finished and its conclusions are not fully baked.

Brian Williams Knows He's Dead.  For a brief moment earlier this week, it looked as though Williams might have found a champion in Andrew Lack, the newly returned chief of NBC News.  According to a blind-sourced story in the [New York] Daily News, Lack was hoping to reseat his old friend Williams in the network's anchor chair.  But whoever launched that trial balloon — presumably a Williams loyalist — must have been ducking for cover the next day when the Hollywood Reporter and the New York Post sent high-velocity rounds through the Daily News item with a blind-sourced story of its own.  "They want Brian to resign," an anonymous source told the Post.  "If they have to fire him, they can't control him."

NBC News chief wants Brian Williams back on the air.  This ship's captain doesn't want to throw the anchor overboard.  NBC News chief Andrew Lack is looking for a way to put Brian Williams back behind the "Nightly News" desk, sources tell the Daily News — and Williams has told confidants he won't leave the network unless he's fired.  "Andy believes viewers want him (Williams) back," the source said.  "The feeling is that (Williams') problem seems to be more with the media and other reporters than his viewers — if Andy can figure out a way to get him back on the air he will do it."

Hillary and Brian slide down the ladder.  Who do you trust?  A. Brian Williams   B. Hillary Clinton   Both are important public figures.  Both have been accused of deception.  Both admit they made mistakes.  Both now ask for your forgiveness and your trust.  But does either one deserve it?

Brian Williams Inquiry Is Said to Expand.  An NBC News internal investigation into Brian Williams has examined a half-dozen instances in which he is thought to have fabricated, misrepresented or embellished his accounts, two people with inside knowledge of the investigation said.  The investigation includes at least one episode that was previously unreported, these people said, involving statements by Mr. Williams about events from Tahrir Square in Cairo during the Arab Spring.

NBC execs leaked new details of Brian Williams 'lying' to shame him into resigning.  Leaks from the investigation into shamed newsman Brian Williams were given to the press to pressure him into resignation, a report claims.  News broke this weekend that the committee investigating the NBC star found he lied in his reporting to make himself look good at least 11 times.

So far, NBC News finds Brian Williams embellished at least 11 times.  A months-long internal investigation of Brian Williams by NBC News has turned up 11 instances in which the anchorman publicly embellished details of his reporting exploits, according to a person familiar with details of the probe.

Brian Williams 'started lying because he felt insecure following Tom Brokaw and then blamed it on a possible brain tumor'.  Brian Williams started embellishing his stories because he felt insecure following in Tom Brokaw's very large footsteps at NBC, according to a new report.  The network handed Williams a six-month suspension in February after he acknowledged he had lied about being on board a helicopter that came under fire while reporting from Iraq in 2003.  But according to a report in Vanity Fair, Williams started exaggerating his stories because he felt insecure about Brokaw, whom he succeeded at Nightly News in 2004.

Brian Williams the Canary.  The story of the Brian Williams saga wherein recorded video descriptions by Williams morphed from having only heard about things that happened to those same things actually having happened to or witnessed personally by him is simply an example of life in today's world of the highly visible Left.  Williams is a political iceberg that holds a whole lot more below the surface.  All of it needs to be exposed if this nation expects to survive in the real world of facts, "truth, justice and the American Way".  Clark Kent is needed just as Clark Kent.  We don't need Superman.

When Network Lies Kill.  Since I haven't watched network news in decades, the saga about Brian Williams' Major Hoople persona is more about drama than anything substantive to my interest.  Whether Williams is a fabulist, an incestuous voyeur who bragged about his daughter's soft porn role on HBO's 'Girls' or simply your average liberal is less compelling to me than wondering if a more dangerous anchor will ever be exposed for his lies.  Unfortunately, Walter Cronkite is still revered as the most trusted man in America even though his lies about the Vietnam War caused countless military deaths by prolonging the conflict.

The List: 32 Lies and Disputed Stories NBC News Let Brian Williams Tell For a Decade.  Numerous accounts now verify that NBC News not only wanted Brian Williams out there building his brand with the likes of Jon Stewart, David Letterman, and Saturday Night Live, but that the NBC brass knew their star was a serial liar. [...] Apparently, as long as Brian Williams' lies helped build the NBC News brand and the "Nightly News" ratings, nobody in charge chose to say anything.

In Big Sunday Story, WashPost Finds More Brian Williams Myths.  A team of Washington Post reporters did more myth-busting in the claims of Brian Williams in a Sunday front-page story that continued to two whole pages inside the paper.  The headline was "Williams undone by his gift of storytelling:  Anchor's love of a good yarn played a role in his downfall."  Wild exaggerations?  "That's Brian being Brian" was the "newsroom shorthand."

NBC investigating Brian Williams' claims that he witnessed fall of Berlin Wall and met Pope John Paul II.  NBC is expanding its inquiry into the alleged tall tales of suspended "Nightly News" anchor Brian Williams, CNN reported Thursday [2/12/2015].  The network's internal fact-checking is "nowhere near done," a senior NBC source told the cable news channel.  The look into Williams' exaggerated exploits has expanded beyond the anchor's claims about being in a helicopter that was struck by an RPG during the 2003 Iraq War.  The new focus will examine Williams' claims that he, not his predecessor Tom Brokaw, was in Germany the day the Berlin Wall fell and a story about meeting Pope John Paul II while a college student at Catholic University in 1979.

Journalists, Lawyers, and Brian Williams's 'Misremembering'.  In most instances, even in the smallest of markets, a reporter might be able to get away with a single instance of "misremembering," or as it might be more appropriately called in Williams' case, exaggeration.  But any more than that and he or she would, or should, be fired.  The odds of that happening, however, are diametrically opposed to the amount of money a particular reporter could generate for a newspaper or television station.  The cub reporter on the newspaper, in other words, is more likely to be fired than the lead anchor on a television station.

Another Tall Tale From Brian Williams? Seal Team Six Claim Disputed.  New details are emerging about about what appears to be another tall tale of wartime heroics from recently suspended NBC News anchor Brian Williams. [...] The chronology of Williams's account does not match up with what we know about where he was and what he was reporting.

Despite 'Long Period' of Concerns at NBC, Williams Given $50 Million Contract in Dec.  The unraveling of Nightly News anchor Brian Williams's accounts of his reporting in Iraq and Katrina-ravaged New Orleans has become a black mark on NBC News's reputation.  A detailed account in Thursday's Washington Post of the decision to suspend Williams for six months without pay appears to demonstrate how seriously the Peacock Network has taken the newsman's transgression — NBC Universal's CEO Steve Burke even considered firing Williams outright.

Within NBC, an intense debate over whether to fire Brian Williams.  Senior NBC officials seriously considered firing anchor Brian Williams because he lied to his viewers about riding in a military helicopter hit by a rocket-propelled grenade during the Iraq war, according to a top network official.  The ultimate decision to suspend Williams for six months was made after an internal investigation unearthed other "instances of exaggeration," according to a person familiar with intense behind-the-scenes discussions between network officials and Williams.

Credibility of TV news in doubt long before Williams' gaffe.  It's not a big deal if Brian Williams eventually is fired, quits, or otherwise stops reading the news to viewers once his six-month suspension is over.  I'm not even sure it's a medium-sized deal.  That may sound harsh, and it's not personal.  As a reader of the day's events, Williams is superb.  His looks, delivery and style helped NBC Nightly News to the top of the ratings heap.  From updates about the war on terror to the latest ice storm, he made viewers believe he is in the living room and speaking only with them.  That takes talent, but he messed up.  There are consequences for a gaffe on the level that Williams committed.

Media Elites Defend Brian Williams from 'Bile Brigade'.  If you don't already despise the elite media, the next few paragraphs should put the final pieces into place.  No joke, some high-profile members of the elite media are now on their high horse (if you'll pardon the expression) over the frenzied coverage of serial stolen valor liar Brian Williams.  In short, members of the elite media don't think members of the elite media should be treated like members of the elite media treat everyone else.

But Will He Lose His Smug? NBC Suspends Brian Williams For 6 Months.  Without pay.  Now that would affect people like us, but for a guy making $10M + a year, I don't think he'll notice.  As I noted on the show, I'm not sure how they bring him back after this.

More Brian Williams Exploits: Hezbollah Rockets, Mugged At Gunpoint!.  Well, maybe Brian Williams is not lying.  Maybe he is just confused.  Maybe he was held up at gunpoint on Christmas, in Israel, after being attacked by a Hezbollah rocket, right after being almost killed in Iraq by an RPG.

Does Brian Williams's incestuous voyeurism trump lying?  What parent would cozy up with his daughter to watch her in a graphic sex scene?  Brian Williams did.  As the mainstream media erupts over Williams' fish tales about downed helicopters, dead bodies floating in flood-swamped streets of New Orleans and burning puppies, another one of news anchor's bizarre behaviors is going unnoticed.  If NBC is embarrassed by its managing editor's fibs, what about Williams's kinky voyeurism when it comes to his actress-daughter's explicit sex-capades on HBO?

Flashback: Fawning Brian Williams Bows To POTUS At White House.  Although I rarely watch any MSM news shows, I do remember catching a segment on NBC, in June, '09, that I had found troubling:  Brian Williams, over a period of several days, had aired a two-hour special about the new president and his life in the White House.  At the end of the last segment, I was shocked when Williams, saying goodbye, bowed to Obama.

Brian Williams is just the latest symptom of a diseased legacy media.  Are we seeing a trend here? Dan Rather at CBS and now Brian Williams at NBC?  Well, two news anchors are not a trend, but biased and bad reporting is.  It's not new, but it does seem to be gathering momentum and nowhere has it been more apparent than the millions of words written and spoken about "global warming" and now "climate change."

Bozell: 'Brian Williams has to go'.  Add conservative media watchdog L. Brent Bozell III to the list of those calling on NBC to dump nightly news anchor Brian Williams for claiming he was on a military copter under attack.  Bozell, of the Media Research Center, said in a tweet today:  "Brian Williams has to go.  NBC's credibility is completely shot."

Brian Williams suspended without pay for 6 months by NBC.  Brian Williams has been suspended from "NBC Nightly News" without pay for six months, the network announced Tuesday [2/10/2015].  The announcement comes amid an ongoing internal investigation into whether Williams exaggerated stories during his public appearances as managing editor of the top-rated evening news program, both on NBC and elsewhere.

Why NBC's suspension is Brian Williams' last hope for remaining anchor.  NBC Universal tried to save Brian Williams' job last night — and that's why he was suspended for six months.  The company finally had to stop the bleeding, to halt the hemorrhaging of its own credibility along with that of its franchise player.  The brass slowly came to realize that Williams had to be punished, and significantly, for the sin of fabricating a story about his 2003 trip to Iraq.

NBC in Disarray Over Brian Williams.  The embattled anchor goes into self-imposed exile and lawyers up.  Meanwhile, NBC investigates, successors line up, and Tom Brokaw watches from above.

Brian Williams: puffed up anchor, puffed up tales.  If even only some of the reports are true, Brian Williams is a serial embellisher, a self-aggrandizing fabulist.  No doubt everyone knows somebody like this, and if you don't it's probably because you're that guy.  But Williams' case is special.  This isn't some sad Willy Loman who needs to invent impressive stories about himself.  If anything, he needed to not tell such stories, given that he reportedly makes more than $10 million a year to be a trusted name in news.

Brian Williams and the God Complex.  Brian Williams, the NBC News anchor, is taking himself off the air for, what he says will be, "several days." He presumably hopes that the media firestorm surrounding claims he made about his reporting experience in Iraq will subside. [...] However, there are some scenarios in which he does not survive as an NBC anchor.  One:  if more fabrications surface from the work of hundreds, probably thousands, of amateur detectives online — eager to prove that Williams was not telling the truth when he claimed, for instance, that he saw a body floating beneath his hotel window in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.

Under Fire, Brian Williams Loses Lofty Spot on a Trustworthiness Scale.  If Brian Williams's future as the anchor of "NBC Nightly News" rests on his trustworthiness and ratings, new research delivered some sobering news on Monday [2/9/2015].  Before Mr. Williams apologized for exaggerating an account of a forced helicopter landing during the Iraq war, he ranked as the 23rd-most-trusted person in the country — on par with Denzel Washington, Warren E. Buffett and Robin Roberts.  On Monday, he ranked as No. 835.

Multiple Witnesses Contradict Williams' Katrina Stories.  Now that everything he has ever said about anything will be under scrutiny for a very long time, there is a lot out there.  As of now, though, it is Brian Williams' Tales from Katrina that are receiving an extra level of scrutiny.  And they are not holding up very well.  Witnesses are calling Williams' Katrina stories of close calls at the five-star Ritz-Carlton Hotel "crazy."

Pilot Says He Told NBC News of Williams' False Story in 2003.  Don Helus, who piloted the chopper that sustained an RPG attack in the story that has embroiled NBC Nightly News anchor Brian Williams in controversy, told CNN's Brian Stelter he contacted NBC News 10 years ago to inform them of what he called Williams' inaccurate account of the attack — and received no response.  Williams is currently on a voluntary leave of absence after admitting a story he has been telling for years about taking rocket fire in Iraq was untrue.  Helus' chopper was attacked, but Williams was nowhere near it.

Brian Williams forced to admit he was NOT shot down in the Iraq War: NBC anchor apologizes.  NBC news anchor Brian Williams has been forced to admit that he wasn't aboard a helicopter hit and forced down by enemy fire during the 2003 invasion of Iraq.  The Nightly News anchor has often repeated the war story over the past 12 years about how the aircraft he was on was forced down by enemy fire.

NBC's Brian Williams recants Iraq story after soldiers protest.  NBC Nightly News anchor Brian Williams admitted Wednesday [2/4/2015] he was not aboard a helicopter hit and forced down by RPG fire during the invasion of Iraq in 2003, a false claim that has been repeated by the network for years.

Why NBC will stand by its $200M man Brian Williams.  NBC News chief Deborah Turness has millions of reasons to save Brian Williams.  Without its chief anchor to keep it at the front of the news pack, "NBC Nightly News" is at risk of losing the multimillion dollar ad premium it has over rivals.  "Nightly News" raked in an estimated $200 million in annual ad revenue for NBC News in 2013.

Now doubts arise over Brian Williams' story about being mugged at gunpoint in his quiet childhood suburb.  An old story often repeated by Brian Williams about his bravery growing up in a quiet New Jersey suburb is being questioned by local residents in the light of his admission that he lied about taking enemy fire in Iraq.  Williams announced on Saturday [2/7/2015] that he is temporarily stepping down from the NBC Nightly News amid questions about his false memories of war coverage in 2003, calling it 'painfully apparent' that he has become a distracting news story.

We shouldn't believe Williams' lie was an innocent mistake.  [Brian] Williams originally told the truth about what happened in 2003 Iraq: He was on a Chinook helicopter.  Another helicopter was hit by a rocket-propelled grenade (RPG).  His helo was nowhere near the one that was struck and landed some 30 or more minutes later.  That isn't a near-miss; that's just rubbernecking at something you didn't even know happened until you came along later.

Anchors Aweigh.  This was a bomb that had been ticking for a while.  NBC executives were warned a year ago that Brian Williams was constantly inflating his biography.  They were flummoxed over why the leading network anchor felt that he needed Hemingwayesque, bullets-whizzing-by flourishes to puff himself up, sometimes to the point where it was a joke in the news division.  But the caustic media big shots who once roamed the land were gone, and "there was no one around to pull his chain when he got too over-the-top," as one NBC News reporter put it.

Maureen Dowd: NBC News Knew Brian Williams was 'Pathological'.  According to Maureen Dowd in the New York Times, NBC News executives knew Brian Williams had a problem with the truth but the infrastructure wasn't in place to do anything about it.  Per Dowd, things were so bad with Williams that his "flourishes to puff himself up" became "a joke in the news division."

Brian Williams' unmitigated disaster.  It's an unmitigated disaster for Brian Williams and NBC News.  The revelation that the NBC anchor had lied on air about being in a helicopter that was forced down after it was hit by enemy fire during the Iraq War is devastating.  It's hard to see how Williams gets past this, and how he survives as the face of NBC News.  An anchor's No. 1 requirement is that he or she has credibility.  If we don't believe what an anchor tells us, what's the point?

Stolen Valor Writ Large.  While [Brian ] Williams will no doubt have most of the liberal media and the Democrat party circling their wagons around him, there are some of his media colleagues who are calling for his resignation, noting that as an anchorman, his perceived honesty is his most essential qualification for the job.

Variety's buried lede: "Senior" NBC News execs "counseled" Williams to stop telling helicopter story.  [Scroll down]  That puts a whole new spin on the story, and NBC News' part in it.  [Brian] Steinberg has three sources that state that news execs barred Williams from telling his story on air, at least during their broadcasts.  If true, then that means that NBC News brass must have known something was suspect about Williams' tale of courage under fire — otherwise, why not tell the story that would reflect so well on their anchor?

Brian Williams' heroic stories include Princess Di and Hurricane Katrina.  He lives in a vivid fantasy world that would make Walter Mitty blush — never missing a chance to shamelessly play the hero or embellish a news story.  Reality-challenged NBC anchor Brian Williams once boasted about abandoning a dying buddy to cover the death of Princess Diana — but said it was worth it because it won him worldwide fame.

The Brian Williams Fiasco Is Worsening — More Possible "Fake Stories" Surface.  Things are going from bad to worse for NBC Anchor Brian Williams.  Yesterday a report surfaced which claimed a pilot remembered taking small arms fire while Williams was on board, this report was used by those who defended Williams.  However, that pilot has now walked back his story saying his memory was wrong and he probably didn't have Williams on the flight.

NBC News standing by Brian Williams in Iraq war-embellishment issue.  NBC News is standing by Brian Williams after the anchor's admission that he embellished his role in a military incident during the Iraq war.  The network has not commented publicly, but an executive familiar with the matter says Williams will face no disciplinary action.  His apology, delivered during the Wednesday [2/4/2015] edition of "NBC Nightly News," was accepted internally.

Did Brian Williams also exaggerate his Hurricane Katrina reports?  On Wednesday [2/45/2015] [NBC News anchor Brian] Williams blamed his mistake on the 'fog of memory over 12 years', but evidence has emerged since that Williams has repeatedly mis-told the story including to late night host David Letterman in 2013.  The anchor's previous credibility as a highly regarded journalist is based partly on his reporting from inside the New Orleans Superdome in the immediate aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in September 2005.

Brian Williams and the Tyranny of Ego.  Like so many others, I find it impossible to believe Brian Williams simply "made a mistake."  At the risk of indulging in armchair pop psychology, I'd say it's far more likely that a titanic ego collided with reality, and reality lost.

Did Brian Williams lie about his Katrina experience, too?  NBC News anchor Brian Williams is in quite a bit of trouble over his admission that his decade-long claim to have endured heavy fire while flying in a military helicopter over Baghdad in 2003 was a fabrication.  Accordingly, journalists are beginning to review other extraordinary claims Williams made over the course of his career, and they are not short on material to parse.

Veterans Livid Over Brian Williams' Lies.  Veterans in all branches of the military who have sacrificed to keep America safe are livid at NBC News anchor Brian Williams, who was forced to admit this week that he had, for 12 years, lied about taking fire in a helicopter over Iraq.

Baltimore Sun: Brian Williams Needs To Be Gone By Friday.  Writing for the Baltimore Sun, media journalist David Zurawik called for Brian Williams to resign or to be fired by Friday.  "If credibility means anything to NBC News, Brian Williams will no longer be managing editor and anchor of the evening newscast by the end of the day Friday [2/6/2015]," Zurawik writes.

Brian Williams faces internal investigation at NBC for lying about helicopter attack in Iraq: sources.  The head of NBC's investigative unit is breathing down Brian Williams' neck.  Richard Esposito has been assigned to investigate the embattled "NBC Nightly News" anchor for lying about dodging danger while reporting in Iraq, sources told The [New York] Daily News on Friday [2/6/2015].  And the reporters and producers who work for Williams are "shocked, furious and sad" about the scandal that that has wrecked the reputation of an anchor many considered "the most trusted name in news," the sources said.



Rolling Stone

Leftists' Utter Mindlessness about Voter Fraud.  Never one to be accused of being the first to stop cheerleading for the DNC, Andy Kroll of Rolling Stone Magazine recently published a piece titled "Wisconsin Is Ground Zero for the MAGA Effort to Steal the Next Election."  Pieces like this are always written the same familiar format.  Republicans = bad.  Democrats = good. [...] The most important player on the stage is the "nonpartisan" because such people are free from bias, which is the space the media would have us believe they occupy.  The nonpartisan is never to be questioned.  His motives are beyond reproach.  Most important, the nonpartisan always, without fail, will support the Democrats' argument.  Because if he doesn't, then he is obviously a covert Republican, and, in that case, he just gets treated like every other Republican.  Mr. Kroll treats the "nonpartisan" Wisconsin Election Commission (WEC) official Meagan Wolfe this way by saying she has spent her entire career in election integrity.  In relaying a conversation he had with a Republican attorney named Richard Heuer, he says Heuer "called its nonpartisan administrator, Meagan Wolfe, a 'very dangerous person.'" Heuer didn't say Wolfe is "nonpartisan" — that is Mr. Kroll telling his audience that, so they know that Wolfe is beyond question.  Heuer is a Republican and therefore not to be trusted.  And since Heuer can't be trusted, the "nonpartisan" election official can't be "dangerous."

We're Witnessing The Death Of American Journalism.  Last Friday, Rolling Stone magazine carried a story based on remarks that Dr. Jason McElyea made to a local station.  He claimed that hospitals in Oklahoma were swarmed with patients overdosing on Ivermectin, causing other patients, such as gunshot victims, to be neglected.  Predictably Rachel Maddow and her myriad comrades on the left gleefully amplified this story on social media.  (Drew Holden comprehensively chronicled this on Twitter.)  The Guardian, Insider, Newsweek, and many other news outlets also carried the story.  The propaganda balloon bulged so much that this became a national, perhaps even global story.  Fortunately, the pin of facts popped the balloon before it could bloat any further. [...] It must be remembered that, back in 2014, Rolling Stone magazine carried a story about the horrifying account of a gang rape at the University of Virginia student campus fraternity house.  The story turned out to be false.  The magazine then retracted the story and apologized to readers and "all of those who were damaged by our story and the ensuing fallout".  An investigation found Rolling Stone magazine guilty of defamation over a false article.  The magazine ended up paying $1.65 million to the University of Virginia fraternity over the discredited rape story.

CNN screen shot
Dr. Fauci rants about disinformation as the CNN chyron says Joe Rogan took a 'livestock drug'.  Dr. Anthony Fauci was on with CNN's Jim Acosta today where he said, "one of the enemies of public health is disinformation":  [Numerous tweets]


Media's ivermectin hit piece totally debunked after hospital says no overdoses from the medicine.  When an Oklahoma doctor told the media horror stories about hospitals jammed with patients who self-medicated themselves with ivermectin right into the emergency room, it was a hit.  Rolling Stone ran with choice bits of the story, which appears to have originated with Oklahoma TV station KFOR-TV.  "The ERs are so backed up that gunshot victims were having hard times getting to facilities where they can get definitive care and be treated," Dr. Jason McElyea said.  But the bombshell report soon went bust.  The doctor who offered a graphic depiction of chaos had not been on the job for a while, and the hospital where he worked said there was no truth to the claim that ivermectin patients were crowding out everyone else.

Rolling Stone's ivermectin fiction shows why Republicans don't trust media.  If you want to know why Republicans have no faith in news organizations, look no further than the Rolling Stone story shared liberally across Twitter this weekend claiming that Oklahoma hospitals were turning away gunshot victims because they were overwhelmed by "horse dewormer overdoses."  Headlined "Gunshot Victims Left Waiting as Horse Dewormer Overdoses Overwhelm Oklahoma Hospitals, Doctor Says," the Rolling Stone story, written by Peter Wade, quoted a Dr. Jason McElyea who claimed, "The ERs are so backed up that gunshot victims were having hard times getting to facilities where they can get definitive care and be treated."  McElyea blamed the lack of hospital beds on an influx of patients who had taken ivermectin to counteract COVID-19 symptoms.  Despite the drug's long history of successful prescribed use in human patients, the online left has taken to calling the Nobel Prize-winning drug a "horse dewormer."

We've got to talk about the Rolling Stone invermectin article.  [Thread reader]  Turns out the story about rural hospitals so flooded with ODs that they couldn't treat other patients was made up, entirely invented.  A lot of people took the bait, and I've got the screenshots.  [Tweet]  But it wasn't just a single story out in the ether.  Plenty of other places picked up the story, too, with no additional sourcing or research. [...] But the real champion of this tall tale was MSNBC.  [Rachel Maddow] had a tweet about it that went viral.  She's got an audience of millions of people and couldn't be bothered to even look into a story that pretty obviously doesn't pass the sniff test.

No, Ivermectin Overdoses Didn't Overwhelm Oklahoma Hospitals And Force Gunshot Victims To Wait.  A story circulating social media on Saturday — thanks to it being picked up by Rolling Stone and Rachel Maddow — claimed that hospitals in Oklahoma have been overwhelmed with people overdosing on horse dewormer, leaving gunshot victims in the lurch.  The story on its face was absurd, yet multiple media outlets pushed the claim, based on the word of a single doctor who gave an interview to KFOR.  That doctor, Jason McElyea, claimed that the emergency rooms in Oklahoma "are so backed up that gunshot victims were having hard times getting to facilities where they can get definitive care and be treated."

'Not An Employee': Hospital Blows Holes In Rolling Stone Story.  Rolling Stone magazine has been called out for publishing an inaccurate story Saturday [9/4/2021] about hospitals in Oklahoma being overrun by Ivermectin overdoses.  The Rolling Stone story reported that the number of Ivermectin drug overdoses have so overwhelmed hospitals that gunshot victims have been unable to get medical treatment.  Ivermectin is an anti-parasitic drug that has a human version but is more commonly used for deworming livestock.  In an interview with local Southeastern Oklahoma station KFOR, a rural Oklahoma physician Dr. Jason McElyea spread many of the same falsehoods.  "The ERs are so backed up that gunshot victims were having hard times getting to facilities where they can get definitive care and be treated," he said.  "All of their ambulances are stuck at the hospital waiting for a bed to open so they can take the patient in and they don't have any, that's it," said Dr. McElyea.  "If there's no ambulance to take the call, there's no ambulance to come to the call."  In response to that interview and the Rolling Stone piece, the Northeastern Health System (NHS) Sequoyah released a statement claiming Dr. Jason McElyea "is not an employee of NHS Sequoyah", he also hasn't worked at that hospital in over two months nor have they treated any patients for Ivermectin overdoses.

Hospital Statement Calls Out Ivermectin 'Fake News' That Was Spread by Rachel Maddow.  Rachel Maddow is no stranger to fake news.  But the MSNBC host's wild conspiracy theories and inaccurate reporting has typically revolved around political gossip, Capitol Hill intrigue, and a chronic case of Trump Derangement Syndrome.  On Saturday [9/4/2021], however, the MSNBC host's personal Twitter account amplified a local tall tale about the drug Ivermectin, which has progressives throwing a tizzy over anecdotal cases that it may have helped some people recover from Covid.  (Joe Rogan being the case in point.)  Maddow took the local story and blew it up into a national one.  [Tweet]  "Patients overdosing on ivermectin backing up rural Oklahoma hospitals, ambulances," Maddow quoted from a local news article.  "'The scariest one I've heard of and seen is people coming in with vision loss.' he said."  The news article itself gives off signals right away that it is not a legitimate source of information.  "A rural Oklahoma doctor said patients who are taking the horse de-wormer medication, ivermectin, to fight COVID-19 are causing emergency room and ambulance back ups," News 4 reported on Friday.

From Rathergate to Rolling Stone: Fake But Accurate.  Rathergate has many similarities to the Rolling Stone rape hoax.  Both ignored the basic rules of journalism to pursue a narrative.  The narrative was so full of holes that bloggers and even casual readers realized that something was wrong and stepped in where the professional journalists had failed.  The difference is that Rolling Stone has even less investment in its journalistic credibility than CBS did.  The principals will not be forced out.  Their work may have been fake, but it was still accurate.

Did someone mention Rathergate?

How Deep Is This Education Official's Involvement In The Rolling Stone Hoax?  A top-ranking official at the U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights has emerged as a potentially key figure in Rolling Stone's false article, "A Rape on Campus."  Catherine Lhamon, who heads the Department's civil rights wing, was identified in a letter sent last month by University of Virginia Dean of Students Allen Groves to Steve Coll and Sheila Coronel, the two Columbia Journalism School deans who conducted a review of the Nov. 19 article, written by disgraced reporter Sabrina Rubin Erdely.  Groves' letter was included as a footnote to the Columbia deans' report, which was released on Sunday and cataloged the failures and lies that led to the article's publication.

Has the Rolling Stone gang-rape author EVER corroborated a story?  In the wake of Rolling Stone's refusal to fire the author behind its now-retracted and now infamous University of Virginia gang-rape story, one has to wonder if this is a rare mistake or a pattern of behavior.  There are some big hints that it is the latter.  Sabrina Rubin Erdely, the author in question, actually has a history of writing articles based solely on one person's account, with no indication that she even tried to corroborate the story or hear any other potential side.

'Rolling Stone' didn't let facts block story.  The best thing you can say about this fiasco is that there was little deliberate lying involved.  According to an exhaustive report by the Columbia Journalism School, the article's author, Sabrina Rubin Erdely, and her editors didn't purposefully publish falsehoods.  Of course, this is faint praise. The field of journalistic ethics can get ridiculously Talmudic.  But it's all based on a very simple rule:  Tell the truth.

Why the Left Lies.  There was only one problem with Erdely's story:  It was false.  Jackie had lied.  And Rolling Stone had no evidence to back up Jackie's story in the first place.  This week, Rolling Stone apologized for the story but did not fire Erdely or any of its editors; Erdely apologized not to the fraternity or its members but to virtually everyone else.  She added, "In writing each of these stories I must weigh my compassion against my journalistic duty to find the truth."  Herein lies the problem.  Journalism does not require sympathy for human beings.  It requires sympathy for readers, who deserve truth.  But for the left, truth represents a secondary value.  It is far more important to forward a particular political narrative than it is to simply state the facts.  And that narrative can only be forwarded if there is controversy over the facts.

Fighting Against 'Rape Culture' Means Never Having to Say You're Sorry.  The extensive post mortem that Rolling Stone commissioned in the wake of Sabrina Rubin Erdely's now infamous "Rape on Campus" disaster rests upon — and confirms — two salient facts.  The first: that Erdely did not receive her story from a source and then contrive to write it up, but instead went looking for a tale that would help her to advance a political narrative.  The second:  that Rolling Stone's editorial process broke down almost entirely, thereby permitting her shoddy workmanship to reach the international stage.

Rolling Stone, media bias, and how the left uses fake victims to create real ones.  Hey, remember that Rolling Stone article about the brutal gang on the campus of the University of Virginia that never happened?  Well, Rolling Stone is officially retracting the story. [...] But here's the thing:  This is mission accomplished for progressives.  When it comes to something like this, Rolling Stone (and others) is much less concerned about honesty in journalism than it is activism through journalism.  It's all about the narrative.  I don't mean to suggest that the writer of this piece wanted the humiliation associated with writing an inaccurate piece.  I'm saying that she didn't bother to even question Jackie's story because it fit her progressive, victim/oppressor worldview perfectly.

Rolling Stone's Fake Rape Piece Shows Media's Culture Of Corruption.  What does a magazine caught in a scandal too awful to defend do? Why, go to Columbia's journalism school for absolution.  That's what Rolling Stone did after its false campus rape story.  It won't work this time.

'Hitler Made a Difference': The Liberal Gang Rape of Journalism.  What percentage of the news reporting staff at NBC, ABC, CBS or CNN voted for Mitt Romney in 2012?  What percentage of the editors at the New York Times, the Washington Post, or the Associated Press have ever voted for any Republican?  For most members of the modern media, the news business has ceased to be a business and is no longer about news.  Instead, journalism has become a sort of missionary field for political zealots engaged in an evangelical crusade for what Ann Coulter called "The Church of Liberalism."  Young liberals become journalists for the same reason others go to work for UNICEF or the Peace Corps, because they want to "make a difference."  Liberal journalists conceive of their careers as a sacred calling, to assist the forces of "progress" in creating a world of "social justice."

'Hitler Made a Difference': The Liberal Gang Rape of JournalismRolling Stone magazine perpetrated a hoax against the University of Virginia, doing "journalism" about an alleged gang rape that evidently never happened.  The source of the dramatic tale Rolling Stone published last November, "A Rape on Campus," was a UVA student named Jackie who has been proven to be a liar. [...] What better way to exploit the political "gender gap" than to claim that college girls are being raped en masse, and then to suggest that the solution to this problem could be summarized in two words:  "VOTE DEMOCRAT!"

UVA Frat Has Powerful Legal Case Against Rolling Stone.  On Monday [4/6/2015], the University of Virginia's Phi Kappa Psi fraternity announced it would investigate a lawsuit against Rolling Stone after the magazine's massive "Rape on Campus" expose turned out to have been based completely on a fraudulent story.

What Columbia Missed In Its Review of Rolling Stone.  In November, Rolling Stone magazine ran a story detailing the horrific account of an alleged gang rape at a fraternity on the University of Virginia campus.  The story quickly proved to be rubbish, and Rolling Stone reached out to the Columbia University School of Journalism to discover how the magazine could have blundered so badly. [...] As I document in my forthcoming book, Scarlet Letters, cases like the Rolling Stone's have become so common because those perpetrating a given fraud almost inevitably advance causes that the cultural establishment, the Columbia faculty included, wants to see advanced.

Here Are Eight Campus Rape Hoaxes Eerily Like The UVA Rape Story.  In a now-infamous Nov. 19 story in Rolling Stone, disgraced journalist Sabrina Rubin Erdely asserted that at least five members of the Phi Kappa Psi fraternity gang-raped a freshman named Jackie at a frat house party, then left her in a bloodstained dress to exit via a conveniently vacant side staircase.  The Washington Post's reporting now suggests that Jackie fabricated huge swathes of her gory rape tale, and that Erdely abrogated her duty to properly investigate it.  Erdely's career is rapidly disintegrating with each freshly revealed fabrication, as it becomes more and more evident that no rape occurred.



Politico

Hey, Politico — what makes The New York Post 'far right'?  In a Wednesday news report, the site's Jason Beeferman snarks about how "the influential, far-right New York Post" seems interested in Rep. Ritchie Torres' likely run for governor.  We'll take the "influential," of course:  Our last pick for president is headed to the White House; our last choice for mayor sits in Gracie Mansion.  But what in heck makes us "far right"?  Yes, we're right of center for New York City; we mostly endorse Republicans and support Israel; our news coverage includes plenty of shocking stories about President Biden's failures at the border, etc.  But absolutely nothing puts us outside the mainstream of American public opinion, and a professional in the biz certainly ought to know that.

Six takeaways from Trump's stunning win over Harris.  Donald Trump didn't just complete a once-unlikely political comeback — he won a resounding victory despite legal jeopardy, the unpopular end of federal abortion rights and rhetoric that repelled broad segments of the electorate.  Kamala Harris lost to Trump in stunning fashion, just as Hillary Clinton, the first woman to be her party's presidential nominee, did in 2016.  The former president built a more diverse coalition of voters than any Republican nominee in 20 years, despite running a racially charged, testosterone-soaked campaign that demonized immigrants.

The Editor says...
That's where I stopped reading, reasonably sure that the rest of the article was similarly biased and dishonest.  Harris lost "in stunning fashion" only if you believe the unrealistic polls conducted by the same sort of "journalists" who wrote the article above.  Trump did not run a "racially charged" campaign, except to point out to minority voters that their habitual support of the Democratic Party over the last 60 years has got them nowhere.  If a "testosterone-soaked campaign" succeeded, maybe that's what most voters are looking for, as an antidote to drag queens in the public library, tampons in the boys' restrooms at school, sex-change operations for little kids, and abortion on demand at any stage of pregnancy — or shortly afterward.  Trump's campaign did not demonize immigrants, except the ones who are present in this country illegally, many of them violent criminals (e.g., MS-13), or possibly Chinese soldiers, and many of them carrying infectious diseases that will have to be addressed at U.S. taxpayers' expense.  Objecting to the socialist Democrats' plan to allow non-citizens to vote is not "demoniz[ing] immigrants."  Let the mass deportation begin!  And if you claimed you would leave the country if Trump was elected, start packing.

FEMA Says "Disinformation" is a Problem — What Disinformation?  The Disinformation About the Information.  Politico has written an article about FEMA Administrator Deanne Criswell, saying disinformation about the federal government response to Hurricane Helene, "is absolutely the worst I have ever seen," Criswell told reporters on a Tuesday morning call.  "It's creating distrust in the federal government, but also the state government, and we have so many first responders that have been working to go out and help these communities," she added.  However, if you go read the article fraught with pearl-clutching and protestation, you might curiously discover there is not a single citation for any claimed "disinformation."  It is very odd to see FEMA and by extension Politico in their defense, claiming that massive disinformation is running rampant, and yet they do not cite a single example of the disinformation they claim to exist.

Media can sure pick them.  On July July 22, Politico reported, "With Biden out, Vance may be the wrong pick for Trump.  "The former president has an electability problem among women, and his pick for vice president only compounds it."  Yes, because women dislike young, good-looking, blue-eyed men with trim beards and trim bodies.  The column also said, "Overall, women voters turned out at higher rates than men in 2022, with participation especially high in some key states like Arizona, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, which are likely to determine the result of the 2024 presidential race as well.  And that year, 12 states elected women governors — a record number."  Ah, so 2024 is the Year of the Woman in politics as it has been every year since 1984 when Walter Mondale chose Geraldine Ferraro as his running mate.  On July 25, out of the people in the universe, Newsweek (and Fox News and CNN) chose Anthony Scaramucci to speak for the Republican Party.

The Myth That Biden Had Nothing to Do with the Prosecutions of Trump.  [Scroll down]  Politico has long prided itself on its supposed insider knowledge of the workings of the Biden administration.  Note that it was reported earlier this February that a frustrated Joe Biden "has grumbled to aides and advisers that had Garland moved sooner in his investigation into former President Donald Trump's election interference, a trial may already be underway or even have concluded..."  [Advertisement]  If there was any doubt about the Biden administration's effort to force Trump into court before November, Politico further dispelled it — even as it blamed Trump for Biden's anger at Garland:  "That trial still could take place before the election and much of the delay is owed not to Garland but to deliberate resistance put up by the former president and his team."  Note in passing how a presidential candidate's legal right to oppose a politicized indictment months before an election by his opponent's federal attorneys is smeared by Politico as "deliberate resistance."

The border deal trap is out in the open, and desperate Democrats are lying to blame the GOP.  The nation's socialist media has made it plain that they hope to pin the migrant crisis they helped create on President Trump and the GOP. [...] Early on Monday morning, Politico, one of the left's go-to propaganda publications posted a story called "Playbook:  Can Dems flip the border script?" wish-casting the hopes and dreams of 'Democrats' everywhere in flipping the script (read: lying) about the border crisis they created.  Using all of their media muscle, they are trying to create an alternate reality in which Trump, who isn't even in the White House, somehow caused the crisis.

Migrants fall victim to NIMBYism as states struggle with influx.  Democratic strongholds are struggling to keep helping the surge of migrants in their cities and states — and it's sparking anxiety in the party about potential fallout heading into the 2024 election cycle.  New York Mayor Eric Adams' tussle with the White House over an influx of migrants from red states has famously soured his relationship with President Joe Biden.  But he's far from the only blue state official pushing back, as public pressure and budget concerns rise in Illinois, Massachusetts and beyond.

The Editor says...
Politico seems to have forgotten about the origins of "Sanctuary Cities."  It was not a Republican idea.  The Republicans aren't the ones who eliminated the enforcement of the southern border.

Politico Hit Piece on Clarence Thomas Goes Horribly Wrong.  Earlier this week, Politico made a horrible attempt to attack Justice Clarence Thomas in a hastily written "fact-check" that turned out to be false.  According to Politico, Thomas claimed that COVID-19 vaccines were developed from cells from aborted children, a claim Politico insisted was false.  "They object on religious grounds to all available COVID-19 vaccines because they were developed using cell lines derived from aborted children," Thomas said in a quote cited by Politico.  In response to this claim, Politico insisted, "None of the Covid-19 vaccines in the United States contain the cells of aborted fetuses."  There were, however, two problems with this so-called fact check.  First, Thomas didn't actually make the statement.  Politico eventually learned this and issued a correction.

So abortion restrictions could now damage the economy?  Politico recently published what other media outlets have called a "bombshell leak," that being Justice Alito's draft opinion indicating that the Supreme Court may be about to overturn Roe v. Wade as soon as this summer.  Much has been made of both the leak and the opinion, which have sent leftists and "progressives" into paroxysms of despair, anger, violence and insanity.  This including vows to disrupt masses at Catholic churches on Mother's Day.  Just the kind of class and dignity you can depend on from them.

The Real Crisis Is the Media's Disregard for Facts and Truth.  Two different topics, but the same problem: [#1] There is no crisis at the border.  [#2] And "authorities say (Ma'Khia Bryant) was wielding a knife."  Thus reported, successively, Politico and NBC News produced two vivid examples of exactly why millions of Americans no longer trust the mainstream liberal media. [...] Mind you, the video of this incident was everywhere.  There, quite clearly, was Bryant, with knife in hand, quite obviously and visibly preparing to stab another black teenage girl with a considerably-sized knife, her hand raised for the strike.  For NBC to say police were "saying she was threatening others with a knife" when, quite obviously, there she was on video with knife in hand, was a preposterous omission.

Politico reporter urges journalists to drop 'conservative,' switch to 'extremist'.  Journalists have one job:  to fairly and accurately report the news.  But, in today's climate, many do quite the opposite.  The left-wing media conglomerate works tirelessly to put Democrats on a pedestal, all while making republicans look like eternal villains.  Now, a top Politico reporter is calling on his fellow journalists to stop referring to republicans as conservatives.  Instead, refer to them as "extremists."

Politico Drops a Supposed Presidency-Crushing Bombshell On Trump, Then the Facts Came Out.  Isn't it amazing how these "mistakes" always go one way?  Politico put a piece out yesterday in which they made quite the stunning charge against Donald Trump.  According to their sources, the President is hopelessly stuck under the thumb of China because he owes their state bank tens of millions of dollars.  Sounds bad, right?  Here's some guy from The Washington Post pushing the story in a thread.  [Tweet]  I won't bore you with the rest of his preening, as it's what you'd expect, i.e. lots of false conclusions being drawn from incomplete evidence.  The point of Politico's story was to take heat off Joe Biden, as the above thread and the article itself draw comparisons to Hunter Biden.

The media has officially lost its mind.  [Scroll down]  Meanwhile, Politico was sticking with a bonkers attempt to make a scandal out of Air Force members paying a cheap $130 a night to stay at a Trump resort in Scotland called Turnberry while they were refueling their planes at a nearby airport Trump does not own or profit from.  Politico solemnly reported that "up to 6 percent" of Air Force members had stayed at the Trump property while refueling at the airport.  So the resort is affordable, service members have been staying there since the Obama years and at least 94 percent of those staying in the area stay at some other hotel.  Politico tried to frame this as a violation of the Emoluments Clause that forbids presidents from cashing in on their position while in office.  That doesn't pass the laugh test.

Jeffrey Epstein Fallout Shows How Little Trust Americans Have in Media and Government.  [Scroll down]  From assuring us the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians to influence the outcome of the 2016 election to reporting every unproven allegation of rape against Brett Kavanaugh, Politico and its brethren have fueled this crisis of confidence.  Pro-life high schoolers wearing Make America Great Again hats were "mocking" and "laughing at" a Native American elder, the media told us.  Hillary Clinton will win the presidency.  The stock market will tank after Trump is elected.  Donald Trump won't serve a full term.  White supremacy is on the rise and poses a greater threat to national security that Islamic extremism because Trump and Republicans are using special "code words" to fan the flames of racism.  There is no national emergency at the southern border.  The Trump Administration is the first to lock migrant children "in cages."  That is only a partial list of falsehoods, flat-out lies and legitimate conspiracies that the untrustworthy folks who populate our once respected institutions have told us in the past three years.

Politico Wrongly Tried to Claim a Pastor Apologized for Praying for President Trump.  I won't blame Krystal Campos, the reporter, because I don't know if she gets to assign her own titles.  But it is pretty shocking that anyone could read David Platt's letter to his congregation and take it as an apology.  All he did was explain to the congregation how it came to be that the President showed up unexpectedly.

Liberal Journalists Falsely Accuse Jeff Sessions of Calling Illegal Immigrants 'Filth'.  Liberal journalists on Twitter falsely accused Attorney General Jeff Sessions of calling illegal immigrants "filth" in a speech he delivered on the Mexican border Tuesday [4/11/2017].  Politico reporter Josh Dawsey took a partial quote from a Wall Street Journal story on Sessions' speech out of context, tweeting that Sessions described illegal immigrants as filth.  From there, it caught the eye of Tufts professor and writer of the Washington Post's Spoiler Alerts blog Daniel Drezner, and the misinterpretation spread throughout Twitter.

Is the Media Too Comfortable with Its Own Mistakes?  In November, New York magazine excitedly reported on the claims of computer scientists that "results in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania may have been manipulated or hacked."  No credible evidence of hacking was ever presented.  In December, Politico reported that the bank of Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin had "foreclosed on a 90-year-old woman after a 27-cent payment error," a claim widely repeated in publications such as Vanity Fair.  As the Competitive Enterprise Institute's Ted Frank pointed out, the "widow was never foreclosed on and never lost her home, and it wasn't Mnuchin's bank that brought the suit."  Seven hate crimes widely reported after the 2016 election turned out to be hoaxes.  Do members of the media feel bad when they get facts wrong or gullibly repeat implausible claims?  Guilty?  Angry at themselves?  Do they resolve to do better next time?

Fake News:  Politico Scrubs Soros Ties to Anti-Trump Group Trying to Mobilize Nationwide Protests.  A Politico profile of a new anti-Trump protest movement calling itself "Indivisible" reported that "conservatives" are "spreading unfounded rumors" that the group is "being driven by wealthy donors like George Soros."  Politico, however, seemingly failed to do even the most minimal research on the Indivisible leaders cited in the news outlet's own profile.  Some of those personalities are openly associated with groups financed by Soros.

Lies my Politico told me.  After feeding the story line for the last two years that Trump was not a serious candidate, Politico is now pretending that he spent eighteen months of his life and $100 million to win an office he did not want.

Politicians, press pile on Politico.  Reporters and politicians ripped into Politico for publishing a story Friday saying Ben Carson "fabricated" a story about being offered a full scholarship to attend West Point.  But even before this criticism started, Republican front-runner Donald Trump had already declared war on the Virginia-based news outlet's editorial standards, saying last week that it is "the dumbest and most slanted" site that he has ever encountered.

Politico Admits Fabricating A Hit Piece On Ben Carson.  There were at least five major problems with the story:
  •   The headline was completely false
  •   The subhed was also completely false
  •   The opening paragraph was false false false
  •   The substance of the piece was missing key exonerating information
  •   The article demonstrated confusion about service academy admissions and benefits

How the MSM spins, example #926: Politico provides Team Hillary a talking point.  The State Department, before releasing one of the emails Hillary funneled through her homebrew server, failed to redact the name of somebody who is (or was) a CIA source.  The House Benghazi Committee later made that email public after it was cleared by State.  If you're among the left-leaning the MSM, how do you spin that?

State Department Screws Up, Politico Blames Trey Gowdy For Some Reason.  That's weird; if Republican Congressman Trey Gowdy accidentally released CIA information, why is the State Department apologizing?  The story here is that the State Department admitted they made a mistake in redacting a series of Clinton emails the Benghazi Committee planned to release.  But despite the State Department admitting that they screwed up and left in the name of a CIA source, Politico's headline is that Gowdy "accidentally released" it[,] even though he got the okay from the State Department to release the emails.

Politico: Media Didn't Ignore Benghazi.  Politico's Dylan Byers, in a piece for his buddies in the MSM, declares that conservative criticism of the mainstream media is overblown. [...] Let us enlighten Byers to the scope of the MSM's betrayal of the public trust, with some added help from the Media Research Council.

Politico Quietly Edits Story Claiming Tea Party Supports Immigration Bill.  Politico deceptively edited its lead story from Tuesday, "Immigration's new ally: Tea partiers" that originally erroneously argued the Tea Party was an "ally" of the "Gang of Eight" immigration bill.  The changes came after Breitbart News caught the site red-handed in a number of factual errors.  Politico made several substantive changes to its piece and the only notification it gave to readers of those corrections was an updated time stamp next to the authors' bylines.

The new oil crisis: exploding trains.  Communities throughout the U.S. and Canada are waking up to the dark side of North America's energy boom:  Trains hauling crude oil are crashing, exploding and spilling in record numbers as a fast-growing industry outpaces the federal government's oversight.

The Editor says...
The article immediately above is one of those "We need more legislation" commercial for Big Government.  Big Oil is outrunning "the federal government's oversight."  Railroad companies apparently don't care if trains derail, you see, but if the government takes over, there will never be another train wreck.



Katie Couric

Katie Couric Beats Defamation Lawsuit Over Gun Documentary.  A Virginia judge has just shot down a $13 million lawsuit against Katie Couric, Stephanie Soechtig, Epix and others associated with the documentary Under the Gun.  The film, which premiered at the Sundance Film Festival in January, provoked controversy because of one scene in particular.  In it, Couric asks gun rights advocates, "If there are no background checks for gun purchasers, how do you prevent felons or terrorists from purchasing a gun?"  Under the Gun shows those being interviewed in nine seconds of silence.

The Three Abortion Amigas:  Couric, Richards, Adichie Make Utter Fools of Themselves.  Former morning host, failed news anchor, and now self-styled independent journalist Katie Couric has always been a fierce supporter of legalized child killing in the United States.  According to colleagues, she even hung a picture of Planned Parenthood's notorious racist and eugenicist founder Margaret Sanger in her CBS News office.  So it should have been altogether unsurprising to see Couric take advantage of some event called Women in the World Summit to promote and endorse radical author Chimamanda Adichie and Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards.

Scandal Plagued News Anchor Katie Couric Will Return to 'Today' Show.  Katie Couric, the scandal-plagued Yahoo News correspondent and former celebrity news anchor, will return to NBC's "Today" show in January.  Couric will guest-host alongside Matt Lauer, also a figure of some controversy, for one week beginning January 2.

Desperate Katie Couric Files to Dismiss $12M Defamation Case.  Director Stephanie Soechtig and Producer Katie Couric were caught red-handed fabricating gun owner responses in their anti-gun propaganda film, Under the Gun, leading member of the Virginia Citizens Defense League (VDCL) to file a $12 million dollar defamation lawsuit.  Couric's lawyers are now desperately attempting to have the case thrown out.

Katie Couric, Stephanie Soechtig sued for $12M for deceptive edits in anti-gun documentary.  A Virginia gun-rights group is suing Katie Couric and the producers of the documentary "Under the Gun" for $12 million in defamation over an interview that was revealed to have been deceptively edited.  The Virginia Citizens Defense League (VCDL) and two gun-rights activists featured in the film, Daniel Hawes and Patricia Webb, are suing Ms. Couric, who produced the documentary and led the interview in question, as well as director Stephanie Soechtig, Atlas Films and Epix, the film's distributor.  The suit filed in federal court Tuesday, obtained by BearingArms.com, claimed the producers of the film "intentionally manipulated" footage to make it look like members of the VCDL were stumped when asked about gun background checks.

Politics, Porn and Gun Nuts.  Katie Couric was the anchor for a while on "CBS Evening News" and was a correspondent on the investigation program "60 Minutes."  She was a star.  She's fallen far.  But she fell gradually, and there were signs along the way. [...] Couric's recent spectacle suggests that the sleaze hasn't bottomed out yet.  Couric's purported story was an interview with several Second Amendment advocates.  You know, gun owners.  Or as people who don't own guns call them, "gun nuts."  Whether or not you agree with them, these gun owners/nuts in Couric's interview come across as rational and well-spoken.  Too much so, Couric evidently decided.  So she fixed that.

Forget Manipulative Editing — Katie Couric's Team Likely Violated Federal Law.  The plot thickens.  A couple of weeks ago, it was reported that Stephanie Soechtig, the director of a Katie Couric-fronted gun-control infomercial titled Under the Gun, had selectively edited her interviewees' testimony in order to make them look dumb.  Now, it seems that Soechtig and her team may have bigger problems than having been caught in a lie:  One or more among them may be heading toward a felony charge.  During a recent television interview, Soechtig claimed indignantly that she had sent a co-producer from Colorado into the state of Arizona, where he made contact with a private gun seller and purchased three handguns and a "Bushmaster" rifle.  According to Soechtig, that these transactions were "perfectly legal" demonstrates that the laws need changing.

Katie Couric Accused of Deceptive Editing in Second Documentary.  Katie Couric's 2014 documentary Fed Up includes instances of deceptive editing similar to 2016's Under the Gun, according to several people familiar with the making of the film.  Fed Up, which focuses on obesity and the food industry, was directed by Stephanie Soechtig and produced by Couric.  The film includes two interviews with figures who hold viewpoints counter to the narrative of the film, and sources say both interviews include at least one misleading or deceptive edit intended to embarrass the interviewee.  Dr. David Allison, an interview subject in the film and the director of the Nutrition Obesity Research Center, says he was a victim of shoddy journalism.  "What she did to me is antithetical to not only just human decency and civility but it is antithetical to the spirit of science and democratic dialogue," he told the Washington Free Beacon.

Yahoo caught off guard by Katie Couric documentary scandal.  News industry veterans are sniping that Yahoo was caught seriously off guard by Katie Couric's dodgy editing scandal.  Company insiders reveal that an emergency meeting of senior executives was rapidly convened after it emerged that eight seconds of silence had been added to an interview in her documentary "Under the Gun" — which she made outside of her Yahoo role — making it seem as if anti-gun-control activists were stumped by a question.  But Yahoo didn't launch a formal investigation into why their "global anchor" ended up having to publicly apologize for the misleading footage.  Couric said in a statement that she had asked director Stephanie Soechtig about why she had inserted the silence, and added, "I regret that those eight seconds were misleading and that I did not raise my initial concerns more vigorously."

Putting the media 'under the gun'.  [Scroll down]  It's hard to know what is worse: "clueless reporters" being manipulated by government officials to spread propaganda, or deceptive reporters manipulating video to spread their own propaganda?  In the latter category, we have the aforementioned Katie Couric documentary which infamously tried to make gun-rights advocates look like they were totally stumped by Couric's "hard-line" questioning.

Harrington, Reliable Sources Panel Slam Couric for Misleading Gun Documentary.  CNN media show Reliable Sources covered Katie Couric's deceptively edited gun documentary Sunday [6/5/2016], with Washington Free Beacon reporter Elizabeth Harrington and the rest of the panel unanimously condemning Couric and the movie's director for their conduct.  Couric has come under fire after the Washington Free Beacon revealed the documentary she narrated and produced, Under The Gun, contains a falsely edited scene where Couric appears to stump gun rights activists with a question about background checks.  Reporter Stephen Gutowski broke the story last month, showing with audio that the gun rights activists actually immediately responded to Couric's question, rather than staring in silence as the movie falsely shows.  "Eight seconds of silence, making the activists look ignorant, like they didn't have an answer, but the truth is they responded to her question right away," Reliable Sources host Brian Stelter said.

Gun Group Calls for Investigation Into Producers of 'Under the Gun'.  The National Shooting Sports Foundation, a prominent gun rights group, is calling for an investigation into whether the producers of Under the Gun violated laws governing interstate firearm sales.  According to Under the Gun director Stephanie Soechtig in a February interview first unearthed by the website Ammoland, a producer who resided in Colorado was sent to Arizona to purchase a rifle and three handguns from private sellers in the state.

Katie Couric's Anti-Gun Producers Repeatedly Violated Federal Gun Laws.  Katie, get your gun lawyer.  By now you've probably heard about Katie Couric's new anti-gun documentary "Under The Gun," and how her producer doctored video of interviews with gun owners in order to make them look stupid and heartless.  Couric's producer and director, Stephanie Soechtig, admitted to doctoring the video, and Couric herself kinda sorta apologized for it.  But that's not the worst thing that happened with the making of this documentary.  It turns out that Couric's production team deliberately conspired to violate federal gun laws.  According to video obtained by Ammoland, a shooting sports news website, one of Couric's producers deliberately committed at least four separate felonies by purchasing four separate firearms across state lines without a background check.

Gun group won't accept Katie Couric 'apology'.  Katie Couric may have claimed responsibility for a doctored interview with a pro-Second Amendment group, but the gun rights activists targeted in her documentary are angry her mea culpa included only a partial transcript of their discussion on background checks.

Katie Couric slammed for 'deceptive' documentary about gun rights.  The Independent Women's Forum issued a statement on Wednesday calling for Couric to be fired.  "Katie Couric should be ashamed of herself for her dishonest and distorted reporting on this issue," said Culture of Alarmism Director Julie Gunlock.  "She has gone from respected journalist to propagandist for gun control groups...  Like serial fabricator Brian Williams, Couric should be fired.  Her tactics have been exposed and Americans should never again trust her to report on these important issues."

Katie Couric takes blame for 'misleading' gap edited into gun documentary.  Katie Couric has reversed course and taken responsibility for an edit that misrepresents the response of gun rights activists to a question she poses in a new documentary.  The segment in "Under the Gun" shows nearly 10 seconds of silence after Couric asks the activists how felons or terrorists could be prevented from purchasing a gun without background checks.  Audio of the exchange leaked last week reveals an almost immediate response to the question.

First Couric, Now Gumbel Accused of Deceptive Edits in Anti-Gun Segment.  They once shared co-hosting duties on NBC's Today show and now it looks like Bryant Gumbel has joined Katie Couric in being accused of using deceptive editing techniques to attack gun rights.  The inventor of the AR-15 rifle, Jim Sullivan, has attacked HBO's Real Sports with Bryant Gumbel for misrepresenting "much of what I had said" in his interview for their anti-gun segment aired on the May 24 program.  Sullivan, in a May 31 article for The Federalist, charged that the anti-gun segment (by Real Sports correspondent David Scott and producers Chapman Downes and Katie Melone) tried "to make the AR-15 civilian model seem too dangerous for civilian sales.  They didn't lie about what I said, they just omitted key parts, which changed the meaning."

Couric Apologizes: 'I Take Responsibility' for 'Misleading' Documentary Edit.  In a statement issued Sunday [5/29/2016], Yahoo News anchor and executive producer of the documentary Under the Gun Katie Couric apologized for a "misleading" edit that appeared in that film.  Couric asked a pro-gun rights Virginia group how guns could be kept out of the hands of felons and terrorists without background checks.  In the edited version seen in the film, the group does not answer for several seconds and stares at their knees.  But when the gun group in question released their own recording, they showed that they were not dumbstruck and immediately gave lucid answers.

The Editor says...
The lesson here is very clear:  When you are interviewed by a television reporter, make your own recording of the interview, preferably with a time code track to validate your counter-claims, weeks or months later.

Epix Removes Katie Couric Documentary From Its Website.  The cable network behind the Katie Couric-produced documentary Under the Gun has pulled the film from its website a day after Couric apologized and admitted it contained a misleading edit of gun proponents' remarks.  Pro-gun blog BearingArms.com first noticed that attempting to watch the film now brings up a message saying "This movie is not currently playing on Epix."

Gun-documentary director shows no remorse for deceptive, demeaning edit.  Katie Couric, the executive producer and narrator of the Epix-distributed documentary "Under the Gun," has apologized for a deliberate and deceptive edit that makes a group of gun rights advocates look like dumbfounded dolts.  In a statement posted over Memorial Day weekend, Couric acknowledged that the edit was "misleading" and that she had failed to forcefully press her initial concerns about it.  For the record, the edit in question misportrayed an exchange between Couric and members of the Virginia Citizens Defense League.  In response to a question about background checks, VCDL members are depicted in stunned silence for about eight seconds.  An audiotape recorded by VCDL President Philip Van Cleave showed that Couric's inquiry fetched an immediate and quite reasonable response.

Katie Couric Finally Apologizes For Her Fraudulent Anti-Gun Documentary.  Katie Couric apologized and accepted responsibility for misrepresenting gun rights activists in her upcoming documentary "Under the Gun," Monday [5/30/2016].  "I take responsibility for a decision that misrepresented an exchange I had with members of the Virginia Citizens Defense League," Couric said in a statement.  The Global News anchor for Yahoo has been under fire ever since the Washington Free Beacon revealed Couric's documentary was intentionally edited to make pro-gun Americans appear incapable of justifying their views.

Katie Couric's GunGate Implosion is a Sign of Things to Come.  While it is not yet complete, it appears that Katie Couric's career is over, at least as a "respectable" journalist.  Couric has been a reliably "progressive" advocate for decades.  In this, she simply followed the career progression that has been common in the dominant media for 50 years.  Control of the media by one ideology, a "progressive" groupthink, has been a near fatal flaw in our system.  It is finally coming to a close.

Newsrooms dance around selective editing of Couric's gun documentary.  Some newsrooms are still reluctant to report outright that Katie Couric's gun documentary was selectively edited, despite the existence of audio evidence and an admission from the film's director.  Instead, several reports have been couched in careful language suggesting the Yahoo news anchor and documentary director Stephanie Soechtig have only been accused of doctoring interviews with pro-Second Amendment activists.

Sometimes, Heads Should Roll.  Of course Yahoo News should fire Katie Couric.  She committed an act of gross intellectual dishonesty — and if you don't fire a journalist for dishonesty, what [...] do you fire one for?  Bad manners? [...] Journalists are not supposed to tell lies to their audiences.  Couric did.  Case closed.

Katie Couric cooks the facts, burns her reputation.  [Scroll down]  To make her case for more gun regulation she decided to transition from journalism to falsification and propaganda.  Instead of showing the interview question and answer as they actually happened, she edited in an eight-second clip of the group sitting silently and slightly uncomfortably waiting to be interviewed.  Couric clearly wanted to present her question as though she were Perry Mason at the climax of a courtroom drama coming up with a killer debating point that confounded all opposition witnesses.  She wanted it to seem as though no reasonable person could disagree and to present the gun rights group as tacitly acknowledging it by staying silent and looking at their feet.  Oh, Katie, you're so clever, you foxed those foolish gun nuts!

Katie Couric is mad she was caught deceptive edit anti-gun video.  As is typical for progressive hypocrites, they never take responsibility when they are caught doing things like Katie Couric.  She was exposing for deceptively editing her anti-gun bs video for Yahoo:  Under the Gun.  News about this came out about a week ago, and Couric had been silent about being exposed, until now.  She is blaming someone named Stephanie Soechtig for deceptively editing the video.  Yahoo now has their own personal version of Brian Williams.

As Silence, Defiance Goes On Over Dishonest Edit, Katie Couric's Proud Legacy Taking Serious Hit.  [Scroll down]  But after leaving CBS (due to Evening News ratings struggles), Couric completed the Big-3 triad by joining ABC in 2011.  That tenure was hardly memorable as Couric simply couldn't establish herself among a sea of (younger) talent.  Her gravitas in the industry was still there but her overall relevance fading.  Enter Yahoo News, which made her the face of its growing online news division two years ago.  If that reads like a career obituary, it's because it may very well be.

Dear Yahoo, Fire Katie Couric.  The case is clear.  Katie Couric, a person Yahoo employs to be the face of its news division, was caught in a grotesque deception.  Then, when she was publicly exposed, rather than apologizing, she doubled down — defending the choice to cast innocent Americans as ignorant rubes rather than allowing them to speak for themselves.  She has lost her credibility.  Any news organization that continues to employ her loses its credibility as well.

Couric Regrets 'Unnecessary Mistake' of Deceptive Edit in Gun Documentary.  Katie Couric reportedly regrets the "unnecessary mistake" of editing her documentary Under the Gun in a way that appeared to smear gun rights advocates.  In one scene of the documentary released last week, Couric is speaking to the Virginia Citizens Defense League (VCDL) and asks, "If there are no background checks for gun purchasers, how do you prevent felons or terrorists from purchasing a gun?"  In the documentary, her question is followed by several seconds of silence, suggesting that her question had rendered them dumb.  In fact, the interviewees offered lucid responses to her question almost immediately, a fact that was revealed when the VCDL released their own audio recording of the interview.  The VCDL called the edit "unbelievable and extremely unprofessional."  "I never intended to make anyone look bad and I apologize if anyone felt that way," the documentary's director Stephanie Soechtig said after the news broke last Wednesday [5/25/2016].

The Editor says...
Of course they intended to make gun owners look bad.  That was apparently the whole purpose of the film.

Katie Couric Is A Liberal Hack, Site Claims.  Stephen Gutowski of The Washington Free Beacon had a great story Wednesday [5/25/2016].  You can read it [elsew]here.  He obtained audio that proves the filmmaker of Katie Couric's latest politicized documentary, Under the Gun, deceptively edited an interview with gun rights activists to make them look ignorant and ashamed.  The evidence he found is clear, it is direct, it is stunning, and it is embarrassing.  But it is not nearly as embarrassing as the way in which the filmmaker, Couric, and the New York Times reacted to the Free Beacon's reporting.  They all need to spend some time alone in the corner and think about what they've done.

Audio Shows Katie Couric Documentary Deceptively Edited Interview with Pro-Gun ActivistsUnder the Gun bills itself as a documentary that "examines the events and people who have kept the gun debate fierce and the progress slow, even as gun deaths and mass shootings continue to increase."  It follows a number of gun violence victims and those who have lost family members to gun violence as they advocate for stricter gun control laws.  The 1 hour and 45 minute film was executive produced and narrated by Katie Couric.  Under the Gun has been labeled "dishonest politicking in the guise of media coverage," "loose with the facts," and "a full-length assault on guns and the Second Amendment" by those in the gun community since its debut on May 15.

The Fraud In "Gungate" Is Real, And Should End Katie Couric's Career.  As we noted yesterday, a gun rights group, Virginia Citizens Defense League (VCDL), agreed to sit down with a member of Couric's film team for more than two hours of interviews.  Most of the footage ended up on the cutting room floor, but the real scandal was when Couric's team was caught red-handed swapping out the actual answer for one of the questions they asked VCDL with footage of them staring at the floor, making it appear that they didn't have an answer to her question.  That is not what happened.  Stephen Gutowski and his team at the Free Beacon isolated the actual uncut audio footage as part of their coverage of the story, and it proves without a doubt that the VCDL members did have an immediate and detailed response to question.

Katie Couric defends documentary that selectively edited gun advocates.  Yahoo news anchor Katie Couric is standing by her gun documentary, even after the discovery that it was selectively edited to make it appear as if she stumped gun advocates with a simple question about background checks.  In a statement to the Washington Examiner's media desk, Couric said she is "very proud of the film."  The documentary's director, Stephanie Soechtig, told the Examiner, "There are a wide range of views expressed in the film.  My intention was to provide a pause for the viewer to have a moment to consider this important question before presenting the facts on Americans' opinions on background checks."

The Editor says...
Ri-i-i-ight.  If you believe that, you probably won't learn much from the rest of this web page.




Buzzfeed

Why is Fake News Accepted by so Many?  A recent event comprising a publication by BuzzFeed and responses to it indicates a continuing problem.  BuzzFeed, citing two anonymous federal law enforcement officials reported on January 17, 2019 that Robert Mueller had evidence that President Trump told Michael Cohen to lie about discussions of a potential proposed Trump Tower to be built in Moscow.  On the next day, January 18, 2019, a spokesperson for Mueller repudiated the story:  "BuzzFeed's description of specific statements to the Special Counsel's Office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen's Congressional testimony are not accurate."  Several aspects are interesting.  One is the refusal of BuzzFeed (and CNN and MSNBC) to accept Mueller's denial.  BuzzFeed editor Ben Smith stood by its reporting despite the fact that no texts or other documents corroborated the story. [...] Patience is not one of the outstanding characteristics of the media.  The initial, inaccurate, BuzzFeed story immediately caught fire and went "viral".  Its accuracy was not immediately challenged by much of the media.

BuzzFeed's First Round of Layoffs Puts an End to Its National News Desk.  "This is going to be a tough week," Ben Smith, the editor in chief of BuzzFeed News, wrote in an email to his staff on Wednesday.  On Friday, the newsroom learned just how tough, when the company laid off 43 of the roughly 250 journalists who worked in that division, according to a BuzzFeed spokesman.  The cut was the start of a planned 15 percent reduction of the overall work force at BuzzFeed, a company perhaps best known for producing content meant to be shared on social media.  The layoffs, which the staff learned about from an email sent by the BuzzFeed founder Jonah Peretti, are expected to continue into next week and affect around 200 employees.

Does the Media Deserve to Be Respected and Believed?  [Scroll down]  The fun stopped suddenly last Friday night when a spokesman for Mueller's office said in a statement, "BuzzFeed's description of specific statements to the Special Counsel's Office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen's Congressional testimony are not accurate."  Time to reprise all those 40-year-old Emily Litella riffs from "Saturday Night Live."  In this case, the "never mind" moment came from CNN chief legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin.  "The larger message that a lot of people are going to take from this story," he said to four glum panel members, "is that the news media are a bunch of leftist liars who are dying to get the president, and they're willing to lie to do it."

The media's 'Gotcha!' hysteria is shameful.  It was a shameful spectacle.  The BuzzFeed News report that special counsel Robert Mueller had corroborating evidence that Trump had instructed his former lawyer, Michael Cohen, to lie to Congress about a Moscow commercial project set the anti-Trump mob on fire.  It was the bombshell development Dems and 90 percent of the media have dreamed of — and finally it was here.  Oh, Happy Days!  Except it wasn't true.  Mueller said so in an unprecedented debunking that slammed the brakes on the celebration.

Everyone Who Takes on Trump Ends Up Crushed.  What is this eerie power Donald Trump has to select the perfect enemies, enemies whose own myriad failings often cause them to commit ritual suicide whenever they face him?  He usually doesn't even have to do anything — these goofs do it to themselves.  His latest victim is BuzzFraud, that listcicle-curating web site for millennial geeks [...] It's not like BuzzFraud had a lot of journalistic credibility to start with, but props to them for managing to gather up every iota of once and future integrity, hauling it out in front of everyone, dousing it with 91 octane premium, and tossing in a match.

What makes a liberal want to punch a child?  If someone walks up to you and bangs a drum in your face, are you guilty of harassing the drummer?  You might be if you're white and wearing a MAGA hat. [...] It was a tale perfectly tailored to liberal biases:  white Catholic teenagers in MAGA hats had harassed an old and frail Indian veteran during the March for Life, which was also the date of an Indigenous People's March.  BuzzFeed had just two anonymous sources, purportedly in 'law-enforcement,' for its story, which a few brave souls found to be rather too little to justify the attendant hype.  The contrarians appear to have been right, but what BuzzFeed misreported was so perfectly attuned to elite and progressive anti-Trump sensibilities that no hesitation was necessary before accepting the tale as true.

BuzzFeed, buzz off.  On Thursday evening BuzzFeed posted a story with the attention-grabbing headline "President Trump Directed His Attorney Michael Cohen To Lie To Congress About The Moscow Tower Project."  CNN ran with the story essentially nonstop yesterday.  Below is CNN New Day's tweet with a video clip of the show's interview with BuzzFeed reporter Anthony Cormier discussing his story yesterday morning.  The excitement was palpable.  "If true," Trump was toast.  Democrats couldn't contain themselves. [...] If not true, however, BuzzFeed is toast.  Or should be.

Dear reporter:  First, wipe the egg and the smirk off your face.  [Scroll down]  The BuzzFeed story was false.  BuzzFeed stories throughout the Trump presidency have been false.  No real journalist would have gone with the story.  "According to BuzzFeed" does not let reporters off the hook because they vouched for BuzzFeed by basing stories on its reporting.  [Aaron] Blake needs to apologize.  Blake needs to decide if he is a reporter or a pundit.

Weird new frontiers in media bias:  BuzzFeed versus Robert Mueller?  Thursday [1/17/2019], BuzzFeed reported that President Trump had ordered Michael Cohen to lie to Congress.  Friday, at a late hour (after a day of misinformation), Robert Mueller had his office refute the details of the report and its implications.  This is a rare event by the special counsel office.  Those on the right see this as further evidence of "fake news," and the left argues that this proves how fair Mueller will be.  We must wonder how this story originated.  BuzzFeed editor Ben Smith is still claiming that the story is accurate and wants Mueller to clarify his denial.  Watching the reporters on CNN and MSNBC with downtrodden faces try to analyze how to turn this defeat around makes one cringe as journalism has taken another severe hit.  BuzzFeed had reported on the Steele dossier, which was the source of the FISA warrants and shown to be false.  Trump antagonists still see BuzzFeed as a serious media outlet.

Yet another Trump 'bombshell' ends up being a hoax.  Another leak about President Trump, supposedly from federal prosecutors, and another media freakout.  This one was different from the earlier ones in its seriousness.  Two reporters from BuzzFeed, citing two anonymous law enforcement officials, reported that Trump had instructed his former lawyer Michael Cohen to lie to Congress, or at least that this accusation had been passed on to special counsel Robert Mueller.  In a late Friday night [1/18/2019] news dump 24 hours after this "scoop," Mueller released a statement that the whole thing was a big hoax — "not accurate."

Mueller team disputes BuzzFeed report claiming Trump told Cohen to lie.  Special Counsel Robert Mueller's office on Friday issued an extraordinary statement disputing a bombshell news report that claimed President Trump directed Michael Cohen to lie about the timing of discussions over a proposed Trump Tower project in Moscow.  "BuzzFeed's description of specific statements to the Special Counsel's Office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen's Congressional testimony are not accurate," Peter Carr, a spokesman for Mueller's office, said.  The statement is remarkable in that Mueller's team rarely issues statements in response to news stories.

Dems Who Pushed BuzzFeed Report Silent After Special Counsel Statement.  Democrats who pushed BuzzFeed's anonymously-sourced report that President Trump had instructed his former lawyer Michael Cohen to lie to Congress were silent Friday evening [1/18/2019] after Special Counsel Robert Mueller's office issued a statement disputing the report.  "BuzzFeed's description of specific statements to the Special Counsel's Office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen's Congressional testimony are not accurate," Special Counsel spokesman Peter Carr said in a statement.

Trump Praises Mueller for Knocking Down 'Phony' Buzzfeed Story.  President Donald Trump offered rare praise Saturday for the special counsel's office, which issued a statement Friday night knocking down a BuzzFeed story alleging Trump instructed his former lawyer, Michael Cohen, to lie to Congress about Russia.  "I appreciate the special counsel coming out with a statement last night.  I think it was very appropriate that they did so.  I very much appreciate that," Trump told reporters outside the White House.  "I think that the BuzzFeed piece was a disgrace to our country.  It was a disgrace to journalism," Trump said, referring to BuzzFeed's report as a "totally phony story."

Another TEOTWAWKI Nothing-Burger.  Surprise, surprise, yawn.  Another "bombshell report" that turns out to be nothing but a firecracker, if that. [...] By trial and error, We the People have learned to separate the wheat from the chaff, the trustworthy from propaganda, valid news from intentional disinformation.  One thing for sure — the old fossil news organizations can no longer be trusted.  These days only hopelessly hypnotized sheeple pay them any attention at all.

CNN Guest: Buzzfeed 'Got Their Brains Kicked In' by Mueller's Team.  CNN contributor Joan Walsh declined to "jump to say that [BuzzFeed] did something wrong" because their journalists have a "good track record," but Ferguson scoffed at the idea that the news outlet should get the benefit of the doubt.  "Two things here:  BuzzFeed is not a serious news organization, they shouldn't be treated as such moving forward," Ferguson said.  "This is embarrassing they put this out there."  "To try to defend BuzzFeed, I think, is ridiculous," he added.  Walsh contested, "BuzzFeed is an excellent news organization."  "Well, you can say that, but they just got their brains kicked in by the Special Counsel's office," Ferguson asserted.

CNN Analyst:  Many Americans Will Dismiss Media as 'Leftist Liars' Over Disputed BuzzFeed Story.  CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin fretted Friday that many Americans would dismiss the news media as a "bunch of leftist liars" in the wake of the BuzzFeed News story called "not accurate" by special counsel Robert Mueller's office.  BuzzFeed set off a Washington firestorm on Thursday [1/17/2019] with its report that President Donald Trump had directed longtime lawyer Michael Cohen to lie to Congress about negotiations to build a Trump Tower in Moscow.  However, on Friday night, a spokesman for Mueller's office said the report was "not accurate."

Trump calls release of BuzzFeed report 'a sad day for journalism'; Giuliani urges DOJ pursuit of leakers.  President Trump on Friday night slammed a BuzzFeed News report, which alleges the president has been implicated in a crime, saying its release marked a "very sad day for journalism" after Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team released a rare statement claiming the outlet got its facts wrong.  Trump went to Twitter to remind his 57.5 million followers that BuzzFeed, an outlet he once called a "failing pile of garbage," once also published the unverified and salacious dossier by former British spy Christopher Steele that was used to justify the FISA surveillance warrant against Carter Page, a former campaign adviser to then-candidate Trump.  "Remember it was Buzzfeed that released the totally discredited 'Dossier,' paid for by Crooked Hillary Clinton and the Democrats (as opposition research), on which the entire Russian probe is based!" he tweeted.  "A very sad day for journalism, but a great day for our Country!"

Levin Blasts Buzzfeed Report, Past Questionable Reporting: 'Yellow Journalism as Low as I've Seen'.  "Life, Liberty & Levin" host Mark Levin said on "Hannity" that the Buzzfeed report disputed by Special Counsel Robert Mueller was the latest example of "yellow journalism" by a media outlet trying to take down the president.  Sean Hannity said the documented "pages" of unconfirmed reporting that have been published by various news outlets critical of Trump is "hurting the country."  "It's all intended to drive toward impeachment," Levin responded.

Buzzfeed News Bombshell Reporter:  No We Have Not Seen the Evidence Supporting Our Report.  Anthony Cormier is one of the two investigative reporter at BuzzfeedNews who co-authored the bombshell report published Thursday night [1/17/2019] — a report which claimed President Donald Trump directed his former lawyer Michael Cohen to lie during Congressional testimony over discussions between the Trump Organization and Russian authorities about a Trump Tower Moscow project.  Cormier appeared on CNN's New Day and revealed that he had not seen the evidence underlying his report.

Nine Reasons to Be Skeptical of BuzzFeed's Cohen Report.  [#1] BuzzFeed's Lead Reporter Is a Proven Liar:  The lead reporter on the story is Jason Leopold, someone no less than Columbia Journalism Review declared a "serial fabulist." [...] [#2] BuzzFeed's Lead Reporter Has Published Fake Bombshell Scoops Before:  In 2006, Leopold shook the world with the news that Karl Rove — get this — "told President Bush and Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten, as well as a few other high level administration officials" he would be indicted for leaking Valerie Plame's name to the media. [...] [#4] We Are Supposed to Believe Michael Cohen:  Lost in all the hype over this story is the fact that the source of the allegation against Trump can only be Michael Cohen, who has already pled guilty and will be going to prison for, among other things, lying.

RNC Official at Trump's Hispanic Meeting Debunks False BuzzFeed, Univision Reports that Donald Succumbed to Amnesty Activists.  A senior staffer at the Republican National Committee (RNC) told Breitbart News Saturday GOP presidential candidate Donald J. Trump did not say or suggest that he was open to granting any legal status — amnesty — to any illegal aliens in the United States at his campaign's National Hispanic Advisory Council meeting as reported in BuzzFeed and Univision.

The Media's Endless Anti-Trump Show Trial.  What was the "Steele dossier" fiasco but a Dem/media attempt to collude with Brits to stop Trump?  Had BuzzFeed not released the contents of that transparently ridiculous and bogus dossier, the self-appointed ruling class would still be talking about it.  Lightweights in the press, straining to sound deep, will recite such quotes as "the bigger the lie, the more it will be believed," even as their coverage rests upon the biggest lie of all:  the assertion of imaginary Trump-Russia criminal collusion based on nothing more than false, fragmentary leads that came from their own collusion with foreign powers.

D.C. firm behind the Trump 'dirty dossier' refusing to cooperate with Congress.  The Washington firm that commissioned the dirty dossier on President Trump is stonewalling congressional investigators.  In a piece for the New York Post, conservative author Paul Sperry writes that the firm, Fusion GPS, which was started by three former Wall Street Journal reporters, is not cooperating with Congress in order to cover up an allegiance to the Democratic party.  Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, is spearheading an investigation into the dossier, and wants to know the identities of the people who paid Fusion to dig up dirt on Trump.

Sketchy Firm behind Trump dossier is stalling investigation.  A secretive Washington firm that commissioned the dubious intelligence dossier on Donald Trump is stonewalling congressional investigators trying to learn more about its connections to the Democratic Party.  The Senate Judiciary Committee earlier this month threatened to subpoena the firm, Fusion GPS, after it refused to answer questions and provide records to the panel identifying who financed the error-ridden dossier, which was circulated during the election and has sparked much of the Russia scandal now engulfing the White House.

BuzzFeed Loses Pair of Motions in 'Trump Dossier' Lawsuit.  A lawsuit against BuzzFeed over the publication of the so-called "Trump Dossier" will go forward, and not in New York City as the left-wing media outlet's lawyers had hoped.  U.S. District Judge Ursula Ungaro ruled against a motion filed by BuzzFeed, which asked to move the case to New York, where BuzzFeed is headquartered.  BuzzFeed also unsuccessfully filed to have the case dismissed.

Melania's first court win is a warning shot to journalists with dodgy info.  Recently, there's been an argument among top-flight journalists like BuzzFeed's Ben Smith about whether it's a good idea to publish potentially defamatory information that is unverified and which even you yourself doubt in part or in whole.  The only correct answer is:  never do this.  And if you have to do it ... still don't do it.  Because there's an excellent chance that, if you are sued, a court will interpret your willingness to publish that which you acknowledge might be false as "reckless disregard" for the truth.

BuzzFeed sued over its publication of uncorroborated Trump dossier.  A Russian-tied tech firm named in a controversial dossier containing uncorroborated allegations about President Donald Trump and the hacking of Democratic National Committee email accounts announced late Friday that it has filed defamation suits against the online news site BuzzFeed, its editor in chief and a former British intelligence agent.  The lawsuits were brought by XBT Holdings, a Cyprus-based company owned by Russian tech magnate Aleksej Gubarev.  Lawyers for his firm filed complaints Friday in London against the former spy and his company, and against BuzzFeed and its editor in chief, Ben Smith, in Broward County Circuit Court in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, where XBT's subsidiary Webzilla is headquartered.

Buzzfeed Sued for Naming Tech CEO in Story About Trump's Alleged Russian Ties.  A Cyprus-based tech CEO is suing BuzzFeed for defamation, after he and his company were named in an unverified document that was attached to a story about President Donald Trump's alleged deep ties to Russia.

Tucker Carlson Grills Buzzfeed's Editor-in-Chief on Decision To Publish Dossier.  Ben Smith, editor of "failing pile of garbage" Buzzfeed, appeared on Fox News tonight to talk to Tucker Carlson about his site's decision to publish that dossier.  He's explained the decision multiple times, been raked over the coals on all manner of networks, and even had his choice questioned by Carlson before, but Smith was back for what felt like Round 282 tonight.  He pointed out that his decision to publish a dossier that was being spoken about among high-ranking government officials and alluded to by some was really no different than what Matt Drudge did by breaking the Monica Lewinsky story.

Bourbons of the Press, Believed by But 15%, Straggle on in Defeat.  [Scroll down]  Then came the Russian connection.  Just as FBI director James Comey had been unable to control an internal revolt against the whitewash of Mrs. Clinton's illegal handling of her e-mails and was forced to acknowledge a problem, some element of the intelligence apparatus released the fatuous Golden Shower dossier, which no press outlet would touch until BuzzFeed, a barrel-scraping, muck-raking left-wing blog, put it out and CNN took it up with tremendous fanfare, claiming Herculean journalistic enterprise to have unearthed it.  Mr. Trump called it "fake news [from] a pile of garbage," and it died.

How BuzzFeed crossed the line in publishing salacious 'dossier' on Trump.  Where does transparency meet irresponsibility?  Right at the line that BuzzFeed's editor Ben Smith approached Tuesday and decided to step over in the name of serving citizens' best interests.  With caveats and explanations aplenty, Smith published a 35-page "dossier" — actually just a bunch of scurrilous allegations dressed up as an intelligence report meant to damage Donald Trump.  Smith said he did so because his, and BuzzFeed's, preference and philosophy is, essentially, "When in doubt, publish."  But at many other news organizations, the rule is caution:  "When in doubt, leave it out."

Buzzfeed Editor-in-Chief Says Publishing Unverified Trump Dossier 'Not an Easy or Simple Call'.  After his publication released a dossier that is reportedly the basis of the two-page synopsis that CNN is reporting the intelligence chiefs presented to President-elect Donald Trump, Buzzfeed Editor-in-Chief Ben Smith tweeted out an explanatory letter he sent to his staff.

Oppo Researcher Behind Trump Dossier Is Linked To Pro-Kremlin Lobbying Effort.  The head of the opposition research firm that is behind the Trump dossier is linked to a secret campaign aimed at undermining the Magnitsky Act, a law that places sanctions on Russian criminals and is vehemently opposed by the Kremlin, The Daily Caller can report.  The main proponent of that law, a British-American businessman named Bill Browder, tells TheDC that Glenn Simpson, the head of Fusion GPS, the company behind the Trump dossier, is a "professional smear campaigner."  According to Browder, Simpson, a former Wall Street Journal reporter, is working with a former Russian counterintelligence officer named Rinat Akhmetshin to destroy the Magnitsky Act, which is named after Browder's late lawyer, Sergei Magnitsky, and was signed into law in Dec. 2012.

Bob Woodward calls Trump dossier 'garbage'.  Legendary journalist Bob Woodward on Sunday clashed with his former Watergate reporting partner over the intelligence briefing of President-elect Donald Trump on the salacious allegations contained in an unverified dossier of opposition research.  "I've lived in this world for 45 years where you get things and people make allegations," Woodward told "Fox News Sunday."  "That is a garbage document.  It never should have been presented in — as part of an intelligence briefing."

Oppo Firm Behind Trump Dossier Is Also A Hired Gun For Planned Parenthood.  The opposition research firm that hired a former British spy to dig up dirt on Donald Trump is the same shady outfit that was hired by Planned Parenthood to put a positive spin on videos showing the sale of baby parts.  The New York Times reported on Wednesday that Washington D.C.-based Fusion GPS is the firm that hired Christopher Steele, the former British spy who authored the salacious but unsubstantiated 35-page Trump dossier that was published by BuzzFeed on Tuesday.  Earlier on Wednesday, The Wall Street Journal identified Steele, who runs a U.K.-based business intelligence firm called Orbis Business, as the author of the memo.

Wow! Look who's attacking Buzzfeed for publishing 'fake news'.  A major network anchor, a person previously personally ridiculed by Donald Trump with an insulting nickname, jumped on board the "fake news" bandwagon, attacking the editor of Buzzfeed who decided to publish a scurrilous opposition research memo that was peddled to the media for months.  Is this what Osama bin Laden meant when he said that people are naturally attracted to a "strong horse"? Nothing could better symbolize the triumph of Donald Trump's stance toward the media than this appearance on the daily version of Meet the Press by Ben Smith, editor of Buzzfeed, and the tough remarks he received from "sleepy Chuck Todd," of NBC News, widely regarded as the most anti-Trump network of all.

Peak 'Fake News': BuzzFeed, CNN Target Trump with Admittedly Unverifiable Russia 'Memos'.  On Tuesday, CNN reported that President-elect Donald Trump and President Barack Obama had been briefed by the intelligence community on memos alleging there was communication between Trump's campaign and Russian officials.  CNN suggested the existence of highly-compromising material targeting Trump which was compiled by a former British intelligence officer.

The Buzzfeed Standard.  So last night, BuzzFeed decided to publish a "dossier" filled with allegations — one of them absolutely disgusting — against Donald Trump whose veracity it openly said it could not verify.  All BuzzFeed knew was that the dossier had been circulating in political circles, that it had been generated by "political opponents of Trump," and had been produced by a former British intelligence agent. [...] But I want to take my argument a little further and explain why — even if every allegation in the dossier is true — what happened here may be a point of no return for whatever is left of fact-based American journalism.

CNN Media Heads and Political DC Operatives Construct More Russian Madness.  If they didn't continually use the same playbook (reference Trump's pre-election manufactured sex assault accusers), these insufferable political media constructs would not be so transparent.  There are trillions of dollars at stake.  The framework for the latest narrative begins with a CNN report, constructed by a familiar set of characters (Jake Tapper, Jim Sciutto, Evan Perez and Carl Bernstein), all referencing a vague and intensely obtuse claim about Russians attempting to gain some form of opposition research leverage against President-elect Trump.

Buzzfeed's Trump report takes 'fake news' to a new level.  So the website BuzzFeed decided to publish a series of memos that have been floating around for months alleging all kinds of terrible things about Donald Trump.  Some of those terrible allegations have to do with efforts to influence the American elections and Trump.  Some of them have to do with Trump's personal sexual conduct.  Readers of this newspaper know well not to include me among Trump's supporters.  But the scurrilousness of what BuzzFeed has done here is so beyond the bounds of what is even remotely acceptable it should compel even those most outraged by Trump's political excesses to come to his defense and to the defense of a few other people mentioned in these papers whose names are also dragged through the mud.

Why You Should Doubt that Salacious Trump Espionage Memo.  Two explosive but implausible claims on page 7.  First, "PUTIN motivated by fear and hatred of Hillary CLINTON."  Hatred, I guess I can see, but fear?  Really?  You think he was afraid of what a Clinton administration would do to Russia?  After Hillary's State Department signed off on a deal that gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States?  Secondly, the memo claims the Russian government was getting "intel from TRUMP's team on Russian oligarchs and their families in US."  If true, this would be the most devastating allegation in the memo; Trump would be acting as an agent of Russian intelligence.  But think about this for a moment.  Yes, Trump has had some dealings with Russian oligarchs over the years.  But how much relevant information about those oligarchs would Trump have access to?  How much would he know that Russian intelligence wouldn't already know?

Left-wing media stunned that Trump hits back.  [Scroll down]  But here's what the corrupt media will not tell you:  BuzzFeed is nothing more than a political propaganda arm of the Democratic Party.  In June, the website terminated an advertising deal with the Republican National Committee because, as their CEO said, "The Trump campaign is directly opposed to the freedoms of our employees in the United States and the world."  Two days later, BuzzFeed's chairman, Kenneth Lerer, hosted a $33,000-a-ticket Democratic National Committee fundraiser in New York City that President Obama attended.  Lerer already had a long history of donating to Democrats — since 2004, he's contributed almost a half a million dollars to Democrats, including $2,700 to Hillary Clinton in 2016.  It should be no surprise that, even after being exposed by President-elect Trump, BuzzFeed editor-in-chief Ben Smith is standing by the decision to publish what amounts to fake news in a desperate attempt to smear the next commander-in-chief.

It was me:  Sworn Trump enemy John McCain admits HE handed smear dossier to FBI.  Sworn Donald Trump enemy John McCain admitted Wednesday that he passed the dossier of claims of a Russian blackmail plot against the president-elect — calling it 'what any citizen should do'.  McCain — a longstanding anti-Trump Republican who had disassociated himself from the candidate's campaign weeks before the election — cast himself as an innocent and concerned member of the public as he justified his move.  He claimed he had no idea whether it was accurate or not — but that he believed the FBI should have it because it was 'sensitive'.

BuzzFeed Could Be In Legal Trouble For Publishing Trump Doc.  While BuzzFeed weathers criticism for publishing a document cache containing unsubstantiated and scandalous allegations about President-elect Donald Trump and his confidantes, they also could face legal consequences.  The organization elected to publish a 35-page dossier claiming Russian operatives had compromising personal and financial information about the president-elect and others in his orbit.  The documents were compiled by a former British intelligence officer working for a private intelligence firm in London at the behest of Trump's political opponents.  They were later shared with Democratic political operatives and members of Congress.

Rand Paul:  Anyone Who Leaked Trump Intel Report to the Press Should Be Jailed.  Wednesday on Fox News Channel's "Your World," Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) told host Neil Cavuto it was his view that if it were a U.S. intelligence agency that leaked an unsubstantiated dossier on President-elect Donald Trump and his relationship with Russia to the press, there should be repercussions, including prosecution and possible jail time.  "What I would say is that if there is private information that someone is blackmailing a public figure and the public figure or someone takes it to the intelligence agencies, you would think it would be private.  And really, this is so important that I think whoever leaked it should be prosecuted.  Someone should go to jail if this was an intelligence agency head talked to the media, they should go to jail.  If it was the Obama administration, they should go to jail."  Paul offered his reason, saying such blackmail efforts may go unreported in the future.




Rachel Maddow

Rachel Maddow's Viewership Plummets After Trump Tax Reveal.  MSNBC host Rachel Maddow saw a steep drop in ratings the day after she released one of President Trump's tax forms.  Maddow and her preceding host Chris Hayes heavily promoted Tuesday's broadcast as a "breaking" revelation, and Maddow devoted most of her program to Trump's two-page 1040 form from 2005.

What's Wrong With Rachel Maddow's Trump Income Tax 'Scoop'?  The mainstream press turned on Rachel Maddow after her disastrous attempt to drum up ratings by hyping a humdrum Donald Trump tax return.  Why are they upset?  She just did what they've been doing since Trump got elected.  After teasing a "huge scoop" on Twitter — that she had Trump's tax returns — Maddow got scooped by the White House, which announced a half-hour before her show started that Trump paid $38 million in taxes in 2005, which was all Maddow had.  That's a huge amount of taxes by any standard, and represented 24% of Trump's income that year.  It didn't take long for others to point out this effective rate was higher President Obama's (19%) or Socialist Bernie Sanders (13%), or even the average paid by MSNBC's parent company, Comcast, between 2008 and 2012 (24%).

The Greatest Fake News Reveal Of All Time:  Trump's 2005 Tax Returns.  It was real news, but there was nothing in it.  That didn't stop Rachel Maddow of MSNBC from playing up her big reveal of two pages from Donald Trump's 2005 tax returns like she had just discovered the Dead Sea Scrolls.

Rachel Maddow Turned a Scoop on Donald Trump's Taxes Into a Cynical, Self-Defeating Spectacle.  At 7:36 p.m.  Tuesday, Rachel Maddow tweeted, "BREAKING: We've got Trump tax returns.  Tonight, 9pm ET. MSNBC. (Seriously)," sending the internet into a frenzy of theorizing.  Did Maddow have Donald Trump's tax returns or just one of the Trumps' tax returns?  Could this be it, the tax return that would bring down the Donald?  If this was it, why wasn't MSNBC cutting into its programming, instead of running a countdown clock to Maddow's show?

Twitter Just Shredded Rachel Maddow Over Trump Tax Return 'Story'.  MSNBC's unapologetic liberal "journalist" Rachel Maddow lit the internet on fire Tuesday night when she teased via Twitter that she'd gotten her hands on President Donald Trump's tax returns — a scoop that would have been pretty juicy, considering Trump never released his tax returns during the presidential campaign as all other modern-era presidents have done.  If only it'd been true.  What Maddow and the fine folks over at MSNBC actually managed to do was get part of a copy of Trump's 2005 tax return.  Which was already 12 years old.  And which the White House had already released.

Backup theory:  Trump leaked his own tax returns?  It didn't take long for MSNBC and Rachel Maddow to go from hero to goat last night.  Now some want to move them from goat to ... victim?  After spending all day hyping an exclusive on Donald Trump's 2005 tax returns but delivering a prime-time "total nothingburger," as Chris Cillizza put it at the Washington Post, some are speculating that Trump set up Maddow by leaking the tax returns himself.


Back to the top of this page
Back to the Media bias page
More about the New York Times
Read about the prosecution (in the media) of the Duke Lacrosse Team
      and Steven Hatfill
Back to the Home page


Document location https://akdart.com/med21.html
Updated December 18, 2024.

©2024 by Andrew K. Dart