Subsections on this page:
Overview and recap articles
News and timely commentary about the FBI regarding their routine work
The alleged plot to kidnap Governor Gretchen Whitmer
News items that have not yet been categorized
Bruce Ohr and/or Nellie Ohr
Roger Stone
Michael Cohen
Paul Manafort
James Comey's notes and memos
The Inspector General's Report, released August 29, 2019
James Comey himself
James Comey's book
James Comey's TV interview, April 15, 2018
The Inspector General's report, released April 13, 2018
The Inspector General's report, released June 14, 2018
The report from Inspector General David Horowitz, December 9, 2019
Disgruntled, whistle-blowing FBI agents
Kevin Clinesmith
Carter Page
Redacted FISA documents released July 21, 2018
Andrew McCabe
McCabe and Rosenstein
Rod Rosenstein
Rod Rosenstein announces an indictment on July 13, 2018
Christopher Wray
Robert Mueller and Tony Podesta
Jerome Corsi
George Papadopoulos
James Clapper
Michael Flynn
Bill Priestap
Professor Joseph Mifsud
Robert Mueller's Russian Election Interference Indictments
Spoliation of evidence in the Robert Mueller investigation
Robert Mueller and his lengthy investigation : Overview and recap
Mueller investigation report issued April 18, 2019
Attorney General Barr
Attorney General Barr's analysis of Mueller's report and testimony on May 1, 2019
Mueller investigation aftermath and retrospective
Attorney General William Barr selects US Attorney John Durham
The Mueller monologue and impeachment infomercial, May 29, 2019
Robert Mueller himself
Mueller testimony, July 17 24, 2019
News articles written during the Mueller investigation
James Wolfe
Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, and their conveniently "lost" text messages
Peter Strzok's public testimony, July 12, 2018
The FBI seems to avoid any evidence against Hillary Clinton
News and commentary about the FBI after the 2016 presidential election but before Mr. Comey's dismissal
James Comey's testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee, June 8, 2017
News and commentary about James Comey and the FBI after his Senate testimony
The FBI re-opens the Clinton email investigation on October 28, 2016
FBI Director Comey appears to reverse his course again, November 5, 2016
News and commentary prior to the re-opening of the FBI investigation on October 28, 2016
The FBI releases embarrassing documents on Friday afternoons
Related topics on other nearby pages:
The Fusion GPS Dossier and the FISA abuse memo.
Abuse of power.
The unexplained mass shooting in Las Vegas, October 2017.
Former CIA director John Brennan.
Hillary Clinton's secret email servers.
Hillary Clinton's cloud of corruption.
Hillary Clinton's numerous other scandals.
Credible allegations of Obama's spying on political opponents.
Obama's numerous other scandals.
Overview and recap articles:
The
FBI's Grotesque Rehab Tour Commences. It has not been a good several years for the FBI. The organization's
checkered history got more checkered during the 2016 election after then FBI Dir. James Comey decided to rewrite the
law on the fly to not charge Hillary Clinton for clearly breaking the law. From there, things just went downhill.
The Russian collusion hoax took center stage, eventually leading to Comey's well-deserved ouster. Unfortunately, his
replacement was another "company man" ready to "protect the shield" instead of bringing the reforms the bureau so desperately
needed. Christopher Wray, the current FBI Director, fought tooth and nail to cover up the FISA abuse that targeted
Trump associates, slow-walking releases, and never actually disciplining anyone substantially for what happened.
'Dirty
cops': FBI leaves trail of lies, leaks, lapses in Trump era. The FBI already has amassed a record of misconduct
by top officials leading up to Monday, when the Justice Department inspector general is scheduled to release conclusions on
whether agents also abused the bureau's intrusive wiretapping powers. To date, four inspector general reports and
internal Justice Department documents have found senior FBI officials guilty of lying, insubordination, security violations,
mishandling confidential material and personal biases against President Trump. Rep. Devin Nunes, the California
Republican who discovered that the FBI had used a Democratic Party-financed dossier as evidence, often refers to bureau
leaders as "dirty cops." Lisa Page, a former FBI senior counsel and one of those singled out, portrayed herself this
week as an innocent victim of FBI betrayal. Meanwhile, news media stories have downplayed the significance of the
upcoming inspector general's report on how the FBI spied on the Trump campaign through the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance
Act and other means.
Michael
Flynn's Lawyer: Top FBI Officials Conspired To Entrap Ex-Trump National Security Adviser. The FBI has
become a snake pit. The nation's largest domestic intelligence and law enforcement body, a beacon for impartial,
professional, and expert investigative work now has a muddied reputation because some people didn't like the winner of the
2016 election. Yes, disgraced FBI Agent Peter Strzok who was fired for sending tens of thousands of anti-Trump texts to
former bureau lawyer Lisa Page, with whom he was having an extramarital affair, embarrassed the agency. It also didn't
help that this man reportedly signed off on the counterintelligence probe that became the investigation spearheaded by former
Special Counsel Robert Mueller. He was also a key person in the FBI's analysis of Hillary Clinton's email server.
There are discussions with also fired Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe about an insurance policy, which many have alleged is
the infamous Trump dossier, compiled by ex-MI6 spy Christopher Steele and financed by the Clinton campaign and the Democrats.
This political opposition research file, which appears to be unverified, was used to secure spy warrants against Carter Page, a
former foreign policy adviser for the Trump campaign.
Lindsey
Graham: There Is Proof Of Systematic Corruption At Highest Level of DOJ and FBI. "Here's what we're
looking at: Systematic corruption at the highest level of the Department of Justice and the FBI against President Trump
and in favor of Hillary Clinton," Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) said on an interview with Sean Hannity on Fox News.
Host Sean Hannity then asked Graham whether officials "lied purposefully" on a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)
warrant application to surveil former Trump campaign aide Carter Page.
The
Obama Brennan Mueller Hoax: Blaming Russian espionage on Trump. The fact is that Russian espionage is an
ongoing occurrence. It has been going on for 100 years. It happens on a constant basis on multiple levels.
To conflate actions of Russian espionage with the Presidential campaign of the Republican nominee is not just unprecedented
and reckless. It is a stupefying abuse of power and authority. It's simply a leap of uncalculated madness.
An anti-constitutional putsch against the electorate. Yet that is at the heart of the Obama Brennan Mueller hoax and
the attempted coup against Donald Trump.
The FBI Tragedy:
Elites above the Law. One of the media and beltway orthodoxies we constantly hear is that just a few bad apples
under James Comey at the FBI explain why so many FBI elites have been fired, resigned, reassigned, demoted, or
retired — or just left for unexplained reasons. The list is long and includes director James Comey himself,
deputy director Andrew McCabe, counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok, attorney Lisa Page, chief of staff James Rybicki,
general counsel James Baker, assistant director for public affairs Mike Kortan, Comey's special assistant Josh Campbell,
executive assistant director James Turgal, assistant director for office of congressional affairs Greg Bower, executive
assistant director Michael Steinbach, and executive assistant director John Giacalone. In short, in about every growing
scandal of the past two years — FISA, illegal leaking, spying on a presidential candidate, lying under oath,
obstructing justice — someone in the FBI is involved.
Criminality
Of Deep State Investigation Of Trump Confirmed — Has U.S. Become A Banana Republic? Both the Justice
Department and FBI have maintained they didn't really know that Trump Dossier compiler Christopher Steele had any bias at all
against Trump. And, even when they got their hands on Steele's unverified dossier on Trump, they claim they didn't know
that Steele's employer, Fusion GPS, had any conflicts of interest. Moreover, when they appeared before the Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Court to get the OK to spy on former Trump aide Carter Page, they didn't tell the court what they
knew. They lied. Or at the very minimum, concealed the truth. This is a crime. How can we be sure
that top officials at Justice and the FBI knew all this? Ohr said so.
Walls
Are Closing in on the FBI and Its Media Accomplices. Those of us who have closely followed the unfolding
scandal at the Justice Department — particularly how the FBI abused its power not only to spy on the Trump
presidential campaign but also on the president himself — have been frustrated with the inaction both of the White
House and Congress. Documents have not been declassified as promised; letters by top lawmakers have gone unanswered
with no consequence; and not one perpetrator in the biggest political scandal in history has been held accountable. The
New York Times over the weekend confirmed the worst suspicions: Andrew McCabe, a disgraced FBI official caught
lying to federal investigators and fired by Trump, and his corrupt lackeys opened up a criminal and counterintelligence probe
into President Trump on the flimsiest of evidence in May 2017. Further, statements from William Barr, Trump's nominee for
attorney general, seem to indicate he would be deferential to Special Counsel Robert Mueller rather than focus on the real
scandal. It was unclear whether a change in leadership at the Justice Department and on the Senate Judiciary Committee
(Lindsey Graham took the reins from Charles Grassley this year) would restart stalled congressional inquiries.
The
conspiracy to destroy the Trump presidency is far worse than we knew and will continue. [T]op people in the FBI
filled with hatred and frankly, anti-Trump rage, who have put aside all values and their blatant political bias, were seeking
redemption for the firing of James Comey. They actually plotted to destroy your duly-elected president. And this
is way beyond what we already knew up until this point. According to, as usual, anonymous sources in the New York Times
report last Friday, two days after Comey was unceremoniously terminated, several top FBI officials actually questioned
whether or not President Trump was working directly for Russia. They did this without a single shred of evidence, zero
probable cause, zero proof of any collusion. It was a witch hunt. The president has been right from Day One.
An
FBI that is corrupt and dishonest — Latest reports offer only more proof. Dishonesty and corruption
are endemic at the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The latest proof comes in a New York Times report that the FBI
initiated an investigation in May of 2017 into whether President Donald Trump was serving as a covert Russian agent.
The accusation itself was ludicrous on its face. But from a legal standpoint, the FBI's probe constituted an egregious
abuse of power. The Bureau had no probable cause, no evidence, and no reasonable suspicions. They investigated
Trump because they could. They defied the law, ignored or perverted facts, and debased the integrity of a
heretofore-respected law enforcement agency. Why did these rogue officials commit such an outrageous act of
malfeasance? In a word, vengeance. Already incensed that Trump had defeated their preferred candidate, Hillary
Clinton, they grew furious when the president fired Director James Comey on May 9, 2017.
NYT
Reveals FBI Retaliated Against Trump For Comey Firing. In a Friday night news dump, the New York Times revealed
the FBI's surprisingly flimsy justification for launching a retaliatory investigation into President Donald Trump, their
chief adversary during their recent troubled era. Admitting there is no actual evidence for their probe into whether
Trump "worked for the Russians," FBI officials instead cited their foreign policy differences with him, his lawful firing of
bungling FBI Director James Comey, and alarm that he accurately revealed to the American public that he was told he wasn't
under investigation by the FBI, when they preferred to hide that fact. The news was treated as a bombshell, and it was,
but not for the reasons many thought. It wasn't news that the FBI had launched the investigation. Just last
month, CNN reported that top FBI officials opened an investigation into Trump after the lawful firing of Comey because Trump
"needed to be reined in," a shocking admission of abuse of power by our nation's top law enforcement agency.
Watergate by Any Other
Name. For almost three years now, the intelligence services and police apparatus of the deep state have worked
tirelessly to undermine Donald Trump. [...] But win he did, and that changed everything. Now it was not a candidate who
had to be stopped but a duly elected president of the United States who had to be kept from knowing exactly what lengths the
government — soon to be his government — had gone to destroy him. From November 9, 2016, to
January 20, 2017, the reins of government were still in the hands of Barack Obama. The apparatus to stop Trump the
candidate was already in place. Now it would be deployed against Trump the president-elect and, later, Trump the
president. Over the last few days, The New York Times, The Washington Post, and other anti-Trump outlets
have revealed, and reveled in, something that many observers suspected for a long time. That the investigation into various
figures associated with the Trump campaign — not only Carter Page, but also George Papadopoulos, Paul Manafort,
Michael Flynn, and Michael Cohen — was just a pretext. The main target all along was Trump himself.
The FBI Prostituted Itself.
Citing unnamed "former law enforcement sources and others," the New York Times reports that "in the days after President
Trump fired James B. Comey as F.B.I. director, law enforcement officials became so concerned by the president's behavior that
they began investigating whether he had been working on behalf of Russia against American interests." The mainstream
media has touted this story as major breaking news. But, to anyone who has been paying even a modicum of attention, it
is crystal clear that Comey's firing did not precipitate the FBI's investigation of Trump. To the contrary, the readily
available record facts demonstrate that Comey's FBI began investigating Trump and his campaign for possible Russian collusion
shortly after he won the Republican Party's nomination.
The Paranoid Style at the FBI.
The FBI's counterintelligence probe of Trump marks one of its lowest moments of political paranoia. As anti-Trump
hysteria, before and after his election, swept through Washington, D.C., Comey and his staff succumbed to it, turning the FBI
into an extension of the Democratic Party. Hillary Clinton's opposition researcher, Christopher Steele, might as well
have had an office down the hall from Comey, such was the FBI's absurd reliance upon Steele's smears. It was bad enough
that the FBI had already treated multiple members of Trump's campaign as "probable" Russian agents during the campaign, based
on nothing more than flaky partisan hunches. It then on even thinner grounds placed a president in that category
too. Out of months of obsessing over Trump — from vows to "stop" his candidacy to talk of an "insurance
policy" in the event that he won — Peter Strzok and company hatched one of the most half-cocked probes in the
history of the FBI.
The FBI's
'Trump treason' probe flunked civics. The FBI took it upon itself to determine whether the president of the
United States is a threat to national security. No one had ever before thought that this was an appropriate role for
the FBI, a subordinate agency in the executive branch, but President Trump isn't the only one in Washington trampling norms.
The Stench Still Lingers.
The political corruption of a law enforcement agency — the kind that led the FBI to ignore the obvious felonies of
one candidate and try to invent crimes in an effort to target her opponent — is, by far, the corruption most
damaging to democracy. The stench of that political corruption still lingers over the FBI and the Justice Department,
but neither Trump nor anyone in his administration is willing or able to deal with it. The problem has gotten worse,
not better.
The Lingering
Stench of Coverup at Justice and the FBI. What began as a good week for President Trump stalled and finally
ended badly. On Monday [9/17/2018], he ordered the Justice Department to declassify and provide to congressional investigators a
pile of documents, many of which the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) subpoenaed more than a year
ago. From Tuesday until Friday morning, we waited in vain for any evidence that the president's order had been complied
with by the FBI and DoJ. On Friday morning, HPSCI Chairman Devin Nunes (R-CA) told a Fox News interviewer that his
committee hadn't seen any of the documents that the president's Monday order had declassified. Obviously, the FBI and
DoJ weren't complying with the president's order. Then came Trump's Friday announcement that he'd canceled the
declassification order after being persuaded to do so by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and "key allies" —
Britain? Australia? Russia? Mexico? — who'd called to urge him not to declassify the documents
in question.
Can We Trust the FBI?
Peter Strzok. Lisa Page. AndrewMcCabe. James Comey. Sound familiar? That's the FBI —
the folks who are being asked to investigate, apparently for one week, the allegations against Judge Kavanaugh. Yes,
that group is mercifully gone now, but who is behind them? And what have we not yet learned of the internal conspiracy
against President Trump currently being investigated by the inspector general? Who else is involved and who then will
be conducting and supervising this investigation? Will it be the same people? In other words, can we trust the
FBI with this when the institution itself is so tainted and deeply in need of reform?
America
in Throes of a Bloodless Revolution. It is obvious that the Federal Bureau of Investigation has been
politicized, and the awesome power of this feared organization has been subverted. They have supported lies, used false
documents to initiate a special counsel, interrupted the lives of American patriots who gave up defending themselves because
it is impossible to outlast a government agency who can use taxpayer money to keep you in court for as long as they want
to. The Justice Department, which has basically been leaderless under the tenure of Jeff Sessions has, under the
feckless interim directorship of Rod Rosenstein, definitely listed to port and been complicit in obtaining FISA Court
warrants under false pretenses. Had everything gone according to plan, Hillary Clinton would have been elected, and all
the corruption would have been buried way down deep.
The
Only Subject Ben Sasse Won't Talk About: Spygate. Although [Ben] Sasse has issued two statements in
support of Sessions in recent weeks, he has not made any formal comments about the misconduct and potentially unlawful
behavior of the following people: Former FBI Director James Comey; former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe; Assistant
Attorney General Bruce Ohr; FBI lovers Peter Strzok and Lisa Page. [...] Comey is now under investigation by the Justice
Department's Inspector General for mishandling government documents. McCabe in under a grand jury investigation.
Ohr twice has been demoted at the Justice Department; his wife, Nellie, worked for the political opposition research firm
that produced the anti-Trump dossier and both Ohrs were in contact with the dossier's author, Christopher Steele.
Strzok and Page had numerous exchanges about how to stop Trump's candidacy and then undermine his administration after
he was elected.
Can
the FBI be independent? When President Donald Trump appointed Atlanta lawyer Christopher Wray to succeed James
Comey as the director of the FBI, my initial reaction was not positive. Wray is a veteran of the Department of Justice
and is part of that good-old-boy DOJ network that knows how to protect its own. Indeed, when then-New Jersey Gov. Chris
Christie, a former U.S. attorney, needed a good criminal defense lawyer — whose millions in fees were paid by New
Jersey taxpayers — he hired Wray. Christie was never indicted in the Bridgegate scandal, but defense counsel
for those who were sought Christie's cellphone to demonstrate to jurors the governor's involvement in the plot to shut down
lanes near the George Washington Bridge for political retaliation. Christie claimed that he gave his phone to federal
prosecutors, but they told the court that they did not have the phone. Where was it? In a safe of the Atlanta
law firm that employed Wray.
New
Schweizer-recommended book exposes extent of corruption at FBI and DOJ. The FBI and the DOJ have gone to the
Dark Side. Amazing, considering their longstanding promotion of their status and posture for decades as the defenders
of freedom and the American way — but times change, and the deep Deep State has no special affection for the
America conceived of and promoted by the founders. I have a friend and colleague who is retired from the FBI. We talk,
and he insists that the FBI basic hardworking field agents and such are concerned and upset about the misconduct of the many
miscreants in the leadership of the FBI and the DOJ. For example, he tells me of the perceived problems that were created by
FBI decisions to make cases headquarters cases instead of following FBI protocols that made the field agents the drivers of the
case. However, I see nothing of any effort by FBI agents to fix the corruption problem at the top. Wanna know why?
They are bureaucrats, and they have no taste for the risks of fixing corruption.
Devin
Nunes: Clinton campaign colluded with 'nearly every' top official at the DOJ and FBI. House Intelligence
Committee Chairman Devin Nunes declared Sunday that Hillary Clinton's campaign "colluded" with nearly every top official in
the Justice Department and FBI. An interview on Fox News had turned to the topic of Trump dossier author Christopher
Steele and his ties to Bruce Ohr, a high-level DOJ official who fed the FBI information from the ex-British spy even after
he was cut as a source for providing confidential information to the media.
Why
aren't the Democrats horrified by the corruption at the FBI and DOJ? It is becoming clearer by the day, after
over a year of investigations, that the Obama administration did indeed weaponize the DOJ, the FBI, the CIA, the ATF, the IRS
and the NSA. Over those eight years, each of the above agencies was transformed into an arm of the Democratic Party tasked
with crippling the opposition and abrogating the Constitution. Since all of the mainstream media already were arms of the
DNC, it is well and truly a miracle that Donald Trump prevailed throughout his campaign to win the election, as the entire DC
bureaucracy and media were aligned against him. Most of them still are.
The
Police Were Not Policed. Most recently, it was disclosed, two years after the fact — and despite the
FBI's kicking-and-screaming refusal to release subpoenaed documents — that the FBI did, as alleged, offer to pay
Christopher Steele to dig for dirt on the Trump campaign. The FBI also knew that Steele was working on behalf of the
Clinton campaign to find dirt on Donald Trump. We now also know that the FBI used at least one informant to spy on
members of the Trump campaign. In other words, the FBI joined forces with one political campaign to thwart the efforts
of the opposing campaign. Has that happened before in American history?
FBI
Vault Release — FBI Requested Data Forensics on Huma Abedin/Clinton Laptop AFTER the 2016 Election, Not
Before. From the Boston Marathon bombing investigation through the San Bernardino terrorist attack; passing the
Garland, Texas cartoon terror shooting; and continuing through Orlando's Pulse Nightclub; and then through the Parkland
shooting and into Las Vegas — via the Mandalay Bay — we always knew something was wrong with the
apparatus, the institutional apparatus, of the FBI... but it wasn't until 2017 with James Comey, Andrew McCabe and the
transparently corrupt Clinton exoneration and candidate Trump set-up scheme that we fully grasped the scale and scope of the
corruption. It is disconcerting to accept that the institution of the FBI is corrupt, soup-to-nuts, including every
aforementioned field office and participant therein. But reality doesn't care about feelings; it just stares you in the
face until we accept it. Talking heads always approach the issue with a co-dependent and enabling qualifier:
"we're not talking about the field agents", they say. Um, no; that's nonsense. If the institution is corrupt,
then every entity within it is corrupt — until such time as the corruption is removed.
Progressive Regression.
The FBI may not recover its reputation. Certainly, the brand of its Washington office is shredded. Watching new
Director Christopher Wray stumble about to reassure us about his reforms inspires about as much credulity as a pre-war French
general touting the invincibility provided by the Maginot Line. The Left more or less has canonized a parade of
disreputable FBI officials. Peter Strzok violated almost every canon of professional conduct, in his personal
comportment, in his blatant prevarication about his own text messages, and in his dogged pride in his conflicts of interest
in using his authority to pursue a political agenda. His superior Andrew McCabe, according to the inspector general,
likewise lied on several occasions.
Christopher
Wray and Jeff Sessions must clean up FBI corruption or quit. FBI Director Christopher Wray and Attorney General
Jeff Sessions are sitting squarely in the crosshairs of history. They must rise to the call of duty and clean up the
corruption we are seeing unfold at the FBI or they must tender their resignations and be replaced by real leaders who will do
what is necessary to restore public trust in our unraveling justice system. A powerful government agency that —
like the IRS under former President Barack Obama's watch — was unmistakably weaponized to target political opponents.
The recent shocking revelations that underhanded FBI officials misled the FISA court to get a warrant to spy on Carter Page, an
unpaid, low-level volunteer, as a bridge to spy on the Trump campaign and transition team is beyond alarming; it's flat-out
corrupt — police-state tactics seen, ironically, in places like Russia.
Just How Far Will
the Left Go? We are about 430 days into Robert Mueller's investigation; the special prosecutor whose team of
lawyers and investigators has in a large part been made up either of Clinton donors, clear Clinton partisans, lawyers who
have in the past represented Clinton interests or employees, or partisans already removed for expressing clear Trump
hatred. The media grew ecstatic over its creation, dubbing it an "all-star" or "dream" team, as leaks assured the
public that next week, next month, or "soon" there would be a sensational indictment proving that Trump colluded with the
Russians to win the presidency.
Obama
intel chiefs gave Russia a pass, and now blame — Donald Trump? Long before the 2016 election, when
Donald Trump was a mere private citizen, Russia was engaged in widespread cyber-aggression against the United States.
Moscow racheted up those attacks during the campaign. And yet, despite knowledge of the ongoing cyberwarfare, the
president at the time, Barack Obama, and his intelligence chiefs — John Brennan at the CIA, James Clapper at
National Intelligence, James Comey and his predecessor, Robert Mueller, at the FBI — reportedly didn't lift a
finger to stop it. Why? Because the Obama administration was obsessed with protecting its bigger agenda: namely,
closing and implementing the Iran nuclear deal and trying to save their collapsed Russian "reset." Calling Russia on its
malign cyber activity would have imperiled both initiatives, so Obama and his intel team apparently chose to ignore it, even
as it escalated.
Mueller's
witch hunt [is] a growing disaster for national security. The evidence is mounting that Special Counsel Robert
Mueller's open-ended investigation into whether President Trump colluded with the Russians to steal the election from Hillary
Clinton (which has turned up nothing on that specific front) is becoming more than just a political burr under the saddle of
President Trump. It may be a growing national security problem.
Rampant
corruption [is] the norm in FBI. People tend to forget, or maybe never knew, just how corrupt the famous but
incompetent Federal Bureau of Investigation has always been. This current scandal is just business as usual for the
agency that has metastasized into America's secret police. Strzok's weaselly testimony last week showed just how far
off the rails the crooked feds have gone. And it just so happens that this summer is the 40th anniversary of another
horrific crime, one in which this same crew of dirty cops played a supporting, but revealing role.
The Gangster State. [Scroll down]
This becomes more obvious when looking at the whole criminal enterprise that is currently called the FBI. There's no question
that the people at the top engaged in a wide-ranging criminal conspiracy to spy on the Trump campaign and engineer a criminal
investigation of his administration, for the purpose of removing him from office. This is the one explanation that
explains the mountain of evidence piled up in the public domain. This is so obvious that no one bothers to deny
it. Instead, the game is to avoid discussing it in public. Lurking in the secret FBI files can be only three
possibilities, with regards to this conspiracy. One, there is proof they cooked the whole thing to help get Hillary
Clinton elected. The other is some out of left field explanation for the mountain of data, that points to an innocent
motive. The final option is a massive hole in the system where the damning proof used to exists, but has now been
destroyed as part of the cover-up. To date, the FBI and DOJ refuse to comply with Congressional subpoenas to answer
this question.
The Gangster State. [Scroll down]
This becomes more obvious when looking at the whole criminal enterprise that is currently called the FBI. There's no question
that the people at the top engaged in a wide-ranging criminal conspiracy to spy on the Trump campaign and engineer a criminal
investigation of his administration, for the purpose of removing him from office. This is the one explanation that
explains the mountain of evidence piled up in the public domain. This is so obvious that no one bothers to deny
it. Instead, the game is to avoid discussing it in public. Lurking in the secret FBI files can be only three
possibilities, with regards to this conspiracy. One, there is proof they cooked the whole thing to help get Hillary
Clinton elected. The other is some out of left field explanation for the mountain of data, that points to an innocent
motive. The final option is a massive hole in the system where the damning proof used to exists, but has now been
destroyed as part of the cover-up. To date, the FBI and DOJ refuse to comply with Congressional subpoenas to answer
this question.
The Overlords Have Arrived.
Today, Americans are trying to separate their consideration of an investigation into possible Russian interference in the
2016 election from what increasingly looks like the wreckage of a failed coup against the election and office of the current
president. And the signs of a confrontation across barricades between Americans and their self-appointed Overlords is
revealed daily in the transcripts and testimony of the participants in congressional hearings and inquiries.
A
Factual Comparison of Watergate and Russiagate Shows They're Mirror Opposites. [For example,] In the Watergate
scandal, the burglars were discovered by a hotel security guard and arrested by local police on the very first day of the
scandal. On day 90 of the Watergate scandal, a grand jury indicted the Watergate burglars plus G. Gordon Liddy
and E. Howard Hunt, two of the break-in organizers. In contrast, the 2016 DNC cyber burglars, whoever they are, have never
been arrested or indicted. In fact, the DNC has refused to allow law enforcement to inspect the crime scene — i.e.,
the server itself. The conclusion that Russians hacked the DNC server relies solely upon the opinion of DNC-funded Crowdstrike,
a firm hired by Perkins Coie, which also hired Hillary Clinton- and DNC-funded Fusion GPS to conduct opposition research on Trump.
Perkins Coie and their contractors were hired to help Clinton "achieve [her] electoral and strategic objectives." They were not in
the business of investigating crimes. There is no public report of the DNC paying the key investigators in the Watergate scandal.
Watergate redux.
President Obama, although appearing confident of a Clinton victory, apparently feared a Trump win would undo his legacy —
which is precisely what has happened — and thus it had to be prevented by whatever means. The leadership of the
Justice Department, IRS, FBI, CIA and others in the Obama administration have been, and continue to show themselves to be, fierce
Democratic partisans. Again, their motivations for what increasingly appears as extensive inappropriate and illegal behavior
seem to be much like their Watergate predecessors. Former FBI Director James Comey, former CIA Director John Brennan, and
former director of National Intelligence James Clapper have all publicly stated that they do not believe Mr. Trump is fit to
be president — with the implicit argument that stopping him is their patriotic duty — the law [notwithstanding].
As the Wiseguys
Turn: McCabe, Comey, and the FBI Boys. [W]hat began as an investigation into Russian "collusion" on the part of the
Trump campaign and perhaps the president himself, is now steadily being revealed as the sham byproduct of the fixed-fight "probe" of the
Clinton email "matter" that allowed the former secretary of state to head into the 2016 election "cleared" of any wrongdoing by the Obama
"justice" department. Vengeful over her surprising loss, the Woman Scorned and her cronies in the former administration and the
intelligence community then concocted the "collusion" narrative, obligingly peddled to the public by the Democrat-controlled media, to
strangle the Trump presidency in its cradle. And they almost got away with it.
The FBI's Watergate. "What did the president know, and
when did he know it?" On June 28, 1973, during a hearing before the Senate Watergate Committee, the ranking member, Tennessee
Republican Howard Baker, posed the central question of the investigation. Forty-five summers after Baker uttered those historic
words, the same question now hangs over the alleged collusion between Donald Trump and Russia in the 2016 election. But this time
the question is directed at the investigators. It runs like this: What did the FBI know, when did it know it —
and from whom did it get this information? The answers are essential to a public accounting of what in fact happened during an
election in which the FBI was investigating both the Republican and Democratic nominees for president or their campaigns. But
unlike Watergate, which the FBI solved, the more we learn about these investigations, the more troubling the FBI's behavior
appears. Unfortunately, rather than make a clean breast of it all, new FBI Director Christopher Wray behaves as though the
bureau doesn't need to answer to the American people's elected representatives in Congress.
London
'bridges' falling down: curious origins of FBI's Trump-Russia probe. The bridge to the Russia investigation
wasn't erected in Moscow during the summer of the 2016 election. It originated earlier, 1,700 miles away in London,
where foreign figures contacted Trump campaign advisers and provided the FBI with hearsay allegations of Trump-Russia collusion,
bureau documents and interviews of government insiders reveal. These contacts in spring 2016 — some from trusted
intelligence sources, others from Hillary Clinton supporters — occurred well before FBI headquarters authorized an
official counterintelligence investigation on July 31, 2016. The new timeline makes one wonder: Did the FBI
follow its rules governing informants?
The Politicization of the
FBI. Over the past year, facts have emerged that suggest there was a plot by high-ranking FBI and Department
of Justice (DOJ) officials in the Obama administration, acting under color of law, to exonerate Hillary Clinton of federal
crimes and then, if she lost the election, to frame Donald Trump and his campaign for colluding with Russia to steal the
presidency. This conduct was not based on mere bias, as has been widely claimed, but rather on deeply felt animus
toward Trump and his agenda. In the course of this plot, FBI Director James Comey, U.S. Attorney General Loretta
Lynch, FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, FBI Deputy Director of Counterintelligence Peter Strzok, Strzok's paramour and
FBI lawyer Lisa Page, FBI General Counsel James Baker, and DOJ senior official Bruce Ohr — perhaps among others — compromised
federal law enforcement to such an extent that the American public is losing trust.
The
appointment of Robert Mueller violates the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. The appointment of Robert
Mueller violates the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. Mueller is not an inferior appointee, but a principal
appointee as understood under our constitutional. His powers are more akin to an United States attorney, not an
assistant United States attorney. Moreover, his boss, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, treats him as a principal
officer — that is, Mueller is mostly free to conduct his investigation with few limits or restraints. The
parameters of his appointment were extraordinarily broad in the first instance, and have only expanded since then.
Indeed, Mueller is more powerful than most United States attorneys, all of whom were nominated by the President and confirmed
by the Senate as principal officers. Furthermore, Rosenstein mostly rubber stamps Mueller's decisions and is not
involved in the regular management and oversight of Mueller to any significant extent, underscoring Mueller's role not as an
inferior officer but a principal officer. As such, Mueller's appointment violates the Appointments Clause.
Mueller would've had to be nominated for Senate confirmation like any other principal officer in the Executive Branch.
Rosenstein did not have the constitutional power to appoint a principal officer on his own anymore than the President himself
does. To do otherwise is to defy the procedure established by the Framers for making such consequential executive
appointments. It follows, then, that every subpoena, indictment, and plea agreement involving the Mueller investigation
is null and void. Every defendant, suspect, witness, etc., in this matter should challenge the Mueller appointment as a
violation of the Appointments Clause.
We
Need to Know What Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Rice, Power and the Rest of Them Did. The Mueller investigation has,
oddly enough, revealed that the greatest perpetrator against the American people in the 2016 election was the federal
government. The greatest perpetrator against the American people was the federal government, was the leadership in the
FBI, the CIA, the national intelligence director, etc. We cannot allow this to happen again. We saw our federal
government used by the prior administration, by the head of the CIA, by the head of the FBI, by the head of national
intelligence and many, many others used to try and destroy the candidate of the opposition party. These Obama
intelligence officials tried to destroy Donald Trump and the electoral process. An administration interfering in
elections is something we've never seen anything before in American history.
How
the FBI and CIA Restarted the Cold War to Protect Themselves. [Scroll down] In the two years that have
elapsed since, it has been learned that the "intelligence" that formed the basis for the sanctions was beyond dubious.
A single unverified "dossier" compiled by an ex-British spy with no discernable connections to Russia was shopped to FISA
judges and the media as something real. The dossier was opposition research by the Hillary Clinton campaign, a fact
that was not disclosed and actively hidden by off-the-book transactions through the law firm Perkins Coie. As a dog
that chases its tail, the fake dossier was being used to cause the investigation which itself lent credibility to the notion
of Russian interference. The FBI and CIA thumbed the eye of an armed nuclear state based on false intelligence.
Why? The answer is now obvious: to cover up their own election year shenanigans they thought would remain
forever hidden in the inevitable Hillary Clinton victory.
The Politicization of
the FBI. Over the past year, facts have emerged that suggest there was a plot by high-ranking FBI and
Department of Justice (DOJ) officials in the Obama administration, acting under color of law, to exonerate Hillary Clinton of
federal crimes and then, if she lost the election, to frame Donald Trump and his campaign for colluding with Russia to steal
the presidency. This conduct was not based on mere bias, as has been widely claimed, but rather on deeply felt animus
toward Trump and his agenda. In the course of this plot, FBI Director James Comey, U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch,
FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, FBI Deputy Director of Counterintelligence Peter Strzok, Strzok's paramour and FBI lawyer
Lisa Page, FBI General Counsel James Baker, and DOJ senior official Bruce Ohr — perhaps among others —
compromised federal law enforcement to such an extent that the American public is losing trust. A recent CBS News poll
finds 48 percent of Americans believe that Special Counsel James Mueller's Trump-Russia collusion probe is "politically
motivated," a stunning conclusion. And 63 percent of polled voters in a Harvard CAPS-Harris Poll believe that the FBI
withheld vital information from Congress about the Clinton and Russia collusion investigations.
FBI-gate:
The Outlines of the Story Are Coming into Focus. Thanks to the work of smart and hardworking (non-mainstream)
journalists, we can peek just a bit over the horizon and see where the story of the weaponization of the FBI via a
senior-level cabal is going from here. I use the word "story" deliberately, because that is the way public opinion
forms itself on major political affairs. The progressives in the media and politics have long understood this.
The cast of the story is now set, and some dramatic plot points have been identified. The ending hasn't been written
yet, of course, but the villains are identifying themselves or being exposed, and some of the heroes are emerging. We
are on the cusp of a drama much bigger than Watergate breaking open, and its story elements are compelling.
Scandal,
Corruption, Lawbreaking — And So What? [Scroll down] Despite a nonstop media assault on
Trump's administration, Representative Devin Nunes, and the congressional investigative committees, more than 50 percent
of the public already believes that the Trump campaign was illegally surveilled and smeared through the confluence of the
Clinton campaign, the Obama administration, and the FBI. Voters would only grow more cynical if some Americans
were allowed to abuse constitutionally protected civil liberties, and to lie to the Congress, the FBI, and the courts, while
the less connected others go to jail for much less. Without a judicial accounting, it will be impossible to clean up
the hierarchies of the FBI and the DOJ.
The Ruling Class Hates You.
Truth is, they really don't like the rest of us. No problem, we have our own lives and families. But it's only
not a problem until such disdain is combined with a sense of political entitlement and the coercive power of government.
Which brings us to the political and cultural union of the Democratic Party and the permanent political class called the deep
state, that forms the unelected, unaccountable fourth branch of government that wields so much power up to and
including the police power of the FBI.
October
2016: James Comey Friend Benjamin Wittes Discusses "The Insurance Policy" Against Trump. In hindsight there are
many contexts that shape a new understanding. Fired FBI Director James Comey ran a corrupt and heavily political organization.
He himself helped to shape the politics of it. On Comey's watch he allowed the FBI to become a weaponized tool against political
enemies. The upper-level officials within the FBI are now under scrutiny as their actions are increasingly transparent in their
political motives.
Biased
FBI and DOJ Officials Broke The Law And Tried To Decide The Election. There can be no question, at this point,
that certain higher ups in the FBI and the DOJ did not want Hillary to be indicted and did not want Donald Trump to become
President. Those efforts were not entirely independent of each other. Below is a timeline of events —
abbreviated though it is — that makes it rather plain that the FBI and DOJ were not investigating potential crimes
objectively. Indeed, they were committing crimes during the process in aid of their preferred outcomes.
Did
Hillary Clinton pull off the dirtiest dirty trick in US presidential history? For law enforcement, Congress and
even journalists, exposing misdeeds is like peeling an onion. Each layer you remove gets you closer to the truth.
So it is with the scandalous behavior of the FBI during its probe into whether President Trump's campaign conspired with
Russia in 2016. One layer at a time, we're learning how flawed and dirty that probe was. A top layer involves the texts
between FBI lawyer Lisa Page and her married lover, Peter Strzok, the lead agent on the Hillary Clinton e-mail probe.
They casually mention an "insurance policy" in the event Trump won the election and a plan for Strzok to go easy on Clinton
because she probably would be their next boss.
From Conspiracy
Theories to Conspiracies. [Scroll down] The FBI itself would have earlier trafficked in a fraudulent
document funded by the Clinton campaign to "prove" Trump and his team were such dangers to the republic that they required
surveillance under FISA court warrants and thus should surrender their constitutional rights of privacy. The ensuing
surveillance, then, would be widely disseminated among Obama Administration officials, with the likely intent that names
would be unmasked and leaked to the anti-Trump press — again, in efforts to discredit, first, the Trump campaign,
and later the Trump transition and presidency. A top official of the prior Department of Justice would personally
consult the authors of the smear dossier in efforts to ensure that its contents would become useful and known. In
fact, all that and more has already transpired.
The FBI's war
on Trump. Two lovebirds and others at the FBI need to be investigated on charges of plotting to influence a
presidential election and later cripple a presidential administration. [...] Curiously, the FBI somehow "lost" thousands of
messages between Mr. Strzok and Ms. Page for the five months from Dec. 14, 2016, to May 17, 2017.
After a public firestorm, they finally turned up on Thursday [1/25/2018], according to Justice Department Inspector General
Michael Horowitz. "This period coincides with the height of the FBI's investigation into possible Trump-Russia
collusion, on which Mr. Strzok was a lead investigator," The Wall Street Journal notes. Compared to the
18-minute "gap" in the White House tape during the Watergate scandal, this is the Grand Canyon. So what does the
Bureau have to say about it? They blamed it on "misconfiguration issues related to rollouts, provisioning, and
software upgrades." Someone at the FBI actually wrote that. Maybe it's true. The pattern of alarming
behavior at the FBI and the Justice Department deserves a recap: [...]
No Such Thing As An Independent
FBI. Of the many criticisms of President Trump, perhaps one of the more ill-considered is the suggestion that
he is interfering with the "independence" of the FBI. The FBI, the argument goes, is not only a high-skilled, highly trained,
and highly professional law enforcement organization — which it undoubtedly is — but should do its work free
from political interference or control by the executive. This is nonsense — nonsense with totalitarian implications.
The FBI is part of the executive branch, an investigative arm of the Department of Justice. The chain of command is simple.
How a Civil
War Happens. Now we're seeing what the pros do when amateurs try to walk in on them. They spy on them,
they investigate them and they send them to jail. They use the tools of power to bring them down. That's not a
free country. It's not a free country when FBI agents who support Hillary take out an "insurance policy" against Trump
winning the election. It's not a free country when Obama officials engage in massive unmasking of the opposition.
It's not a free country when the media responds to the other guy winning by trying to ban the conservative media that
supported him from social media. It's not a free country when all of the above collude together to overturn an election
because the guy who wasn't supposed to win, won. We're in a civil war between conservative volunteer government and
leftist professional government.
The
FBI's Secret State Police. The FBI's current stonewalling bears more than a passing resemblance to the
Geheime Staatspolizei, the National Socialists' secret state police. The people's representatives have been
seeking answers on the probe of Russian influence in the 2016 election. Former FBI boss Robert Mueller has failed to
turn up any evidence of "collusion" in more than a year, but other matters have come to light. FBI man Peter Strzok has
been Hillary Clinton's Odd Job, changing gross negligence to extremely careless, failing to keep records of the interview
with the former First Lady, and allowing her aides Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills to tell more than 300 lies about the
unsecured server Clinton used to send classified material. Representatives such as Trey Gowdy and Jim Jordan want to
know if Strzok played a role in the compiling the fake dossier with Russian content. They also seek to know whether Strzok
was the one who deployed the dossier to gain a FISA warrant to enable spying on the Trump campaign and unmask U.S. citizens.
FBI-Gate: Deep State in Deep
Spit. In January, the Justice Department's inspector general launched an investigation into a possible conflict
of interest involving McCabe's failure to disclose donations to his wife by arguably the closest political ally of Bill and
Hillary Clinton, Terry McAuliffe. The governor of Virginia recruited McCabe's wife, Jill, to run for state senate in
the commonwealth and donated $467,500 from his political action committee into her coffers. The Department of Justice
demoted Bruce Ohr last week for hiding secret meetings with Fusion GPS, the opposition research outfit that paid, with money
received from Hillary Clinton's campaign, for the so-called "dossier" smearing Donald Trump with outlandish allegations
based, in some instances, on second- and third-hand information. Fusion GPS hired Ohr's wife to investigate Trump.
Should The FBI Be Abolished?
For the last few years, the media has been dominated by a number of sensational stories: that Trump colluded with Russia to
influence the presidential election; that the Trump team was wiretapped by Obama intelligence officials; that Hillary used a
private email server to transmit classified information; that Hillary and the DNC colluded with Russian sources to compile a
dossier on Trump, and finally, that Russia acquired 20% of America's uranium supply during the same time period $145 million
miraculously appeared in the Clinton Foundation's bank account. It all stinks to high heaven but it's created a confusing
array of facts that has bewildered most Americans. They all know something is seriously wrong with their country even if
they can't pinpoint exactly what the problem is. But there is a common denominator in all these scandals or alleged scandals,
and that would be the FBI and the actions they took or didn't take. Indeed, it's hard to not conclude that the agency's
actions in these events were improper if not illegal. If so, this validates the warnings by constitutionalists in the
early 1900s that a federal police force would someday be used to prop up the ruling elites and attack those who dare challenge
the establishment.
The
Federal Bureau of Political Investigation. [Scroll down] All of this is commanded by law to be kept
secret so as to preserve evidence, avoid tipping off a potential defendant capable of flight and preserve the reputation of a
person not indicted. That is at least the way these things are supposed to work. Yet none of this happened in the
recently reopened and re-terminated investigation of the misuse of emails containing state secrets by Clinton. In that
investigation, the DOJ did not present evidence to a grand jury. Thus, it did not obtain any subpoenas. And it
did not seek any search warrants. It cut deals left and right, promising not to prosecute those from whom it sought problematic
evidence. After accumulating a mountain of evidence of Clinton's guilt, the FBI did not present it to the DOJ.
A Changing
Investigative Landscape. [FBI Director James] Comey has been battered by news reports of turmoil within the FBI
over investigations of the Clintons. Rumors flew earlier this year that an indictment of Mrs. Clinton was
imminent. The story du jour is that elements within the FBI are closing in on the Clinton Foundation, or the Clinton
finances, or generalized Clinton corruption — were it not for the perfidy of Comey and Attorney General Loretta
Lynch. FBI field agents and supervisors — particularly in the powerful New York field office —
are said to be up in arms, handing in their resignations. The independence of the FBI has collapsed. Don't
believe it. FBI agents are by nature an aggressive bunch — chasing leads, questioning suspects, pushing for
warrants and wire taps — and butting heads with cautious superiors. The tensions between agents who make the
criminal case and prosecutors who make the legal call are as old as the FBI itself.
The Fall
of an FBI Director. Every agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation takes an oath to "support and defend the
Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic" and to "bear true faith and allegiance to the
same." And he swears to "faithfully discharge the duties of the office." It is much the same oath taken by members of
Congress, by military officers and government employees. It is an oath that goes back to Washington and Lincoln.
Its origins lie in the Constitution. And FBI Director James Comey violated it. The oath is not to any president
or government, but to the impartial law of the Constitution. It says that no one is above the law. James Comey
twice stated implicitly that one politician is above the law.
5
of the dumbest things the FBI did before Clinton. In light of the news that the FBI will not prosecute Hillary
Clinton for her use of a private email server, the agency is getting heat from both sides of the political aisle.
Conservatives feel that Clinton was given preferential treatment due to her connections to the Obama administration, noting
that "less important" people have been thrown in jail for far less. Meanwhile, Clinton's defenders claim that the FBI
is largely pro-Trump and that the whole investigation was a witch hunt designed to boost the billionaire mogul's chances of
taking the White House. In other words, pretty much everyone thinks the FBI is corrupt, partisan, and ineffective.
Given the agency's history, that's not an unreasonable assumption to make. Over the years, the FBI has engaged in some
truly stupid activities that make you wonder how it manages to protect us at all.
The FBI: The 'Fix Be In'.
The FBI's reputation has sunk so low under the Obama administration that its initials seem to stand for: The Fix Be In.
[...] Consider the Clinton investigation. The FBI granted limited immunity to five Clinton aides, including Paul
Combetta, who deleted Clinton emails in March 2015 after Congress had subpoenaed her records. FBI agents waited a year
before they questioned Clinton in July for an hour and a half. Shortly thereafter, Director James Comey announced there
would be no indictment in the case; even though Clinton did not hand over "several thousand" work emails to the State
Department, there was no proof of "intentional misconduct."
Book
details how Team Obama schemed to let Hillary skate. In his new book, "Guilty As Sin" (Regnery), out Tuesday
[10/4/2016], Edward Klein claims officials in the Obama administration decided before the first witness was interviewed that
Hillary Clinton would not face prosecution over the handling of classified e-mail.
Comey
'Singlehandedly Ruined' FBI's Reputation: Retired Agents Blast Clinton Probe. Retired FBI agents are blasting Director
Jim Comey over the investigation into Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, according to a Thursday [10/6/2016] opinion piece in
The New York Post. "Comey has single-handedly ruined the reputation of the organization," former agent Michael M. Biasello
told the outlet. He claimed that accommodations given the Clinton and her aides was "unprecedented," suggesting, "which is another way
of saying this outcome was by design."
FBI Director James
Comey Has To Go. FBI Director James Comey has broken the sacred trust of the American people. He
conducted a faux investigation into the State Department email scandal in which dozens of confidential and top-secret emails
passing through an unsecured, private server put our national security at risk. He handed out immunity deals to most of
the major players involved in the investigation. He ignored evidence to protect the Clinton Team from prosecution.
He put President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton's political legacy ahead of the law. He made secret deals to
destroy evidence, thwarting congressional subpoenas. That's called obstruction of justice. It's a crime.
James Comey violated the law. He violated his oath of office. It's corruption at the highest level.
James
Comey and Loretta Lynch Should Be Impeached for Whitewashing Clinton's Crimes. Just when one thinks the
cavalier cabal of Clinton and her cronies has exhausted all manner of corruption, yet another outrage surfaces, implicating
even more people. The bombshell this week is that Loretta Lynch and James Comey not only gave immunity to Hillary's
closest co-conspirators Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson — who, despite being attorneys, destroyed evidence
right and left — but, in a secret side deal, agreed to limit the FBI's review of the Clinton team laptops to
pre-January 2015 and to destroy the laptops when the FBI review was complete. Congress and every law-abiding citizen in
this country should be outraged. This blatant destruction of evidence is obstruction of justice itself.
FBI Working With the Clinton
Campaign? Back in July, the director of the FBI, James Comey, held a press conference in which he said that no
charges would be brought against Clinton for her use of a private home e-mail server. This month, ahead of Labor Day,
the FBI's official documents on their investigation into Clinton's e-mails were released. In July, Comey stated "we
[the FBI] can't establish... that she acted with the necessary criminal intent." The documents released from the FBI sing
a different tune. Hillary Clinton used not one, but three, private servers while Secretary of State and all were kept
in her basement. None of her e-mails use encryption. An e-mail account using Clinton's server was successfully
hacked into in January 2013. A computer and thumb drive with the entire archive of her e-mails was lost in the mail.
Sure, Comey can say that these details show no willful intent to break the law but let's keep going. Clinton used
13 Blackberries and 5 iPads with her private home e-mail server and had aides destroy them with hammers after use.
The
FBI found 15,000 emails Hillary Clinton didn't turn over. If you scrape away all of the spin and the political
positioning that Hillary Clinton's decision to use a private email server has spawned, you are left with these facts:
1.
Clinton is the first secretary of state to exclusively use a private email account for official business.
2. She is also
the first secretary of state to have a private email server housed at her home.
3. When asked by the State Department to
turn over her emails, Clinton had a team of lawyers go through them to separate those that were purely personal and those
that touched on some aspect of her professional life. The personal emails were deleted permanently off the server.
Hillary
Clinton, who tells dreadful lies. Today, it is the American people who have been burned, time and again, by
Hillary Clinton's dreadful lies. Let's review just a few examples of her serial dishonesty: She lied repeatedly
about her emails. She lied when she said she had "turned over everything I was obligated to turn over" (FBI Director
James Comey said the FBI "discovered several thousand work-related e-mails that were not among the group of 30,000 e-mails
returned by Secretary Clinton to state in 2014"). She lied when she said there was "no classified material" in her private
emails ... that there was nothing "classified at the time" ... and that there was nothing "marked classified" in her private
emails — all of which the FBI director said were untrue. And, to top it all off, she lied about her lies —
declaring on national television that "Director Comey said my answers were truthful, and what I've said is consistent with what
I have told the American people" — a claim The Post's Fact Checker gave "Four Pinocchios."
Hillary
Clinton's Email: the Definitive Timeline. Clip and save for future reference.
The
Clearest (No Spin) Summary of FBI Report on Hillary Clinton Email. The FBI could not review all of the Hillary
Clinton emails under investigation because:
• The Clintons' Apple personal server used for Hillary
Clinton work email could not be located for the FBI to examine.
• An Apple MacBook laptop and thumb
drive that contained Hillary Clinton email archives were lost, and the FBI couldn't examine them.
• 2
BlackBerry devices provided to FBI didn't have their SIM or SD data cards.
• 13 Hillary Clinton
personal mobile devices were lost, discarded or destroyed. Therefore, the FBI couldn't examine them.
•
Various server backups were deleted over time, so the FBI couldn't examine them.
• After State
Dept. notified Hillary Clinton her records would be sought by House Benghazi Committee, copies of her email on the laptops of
her attorneys Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson were wiped with BleachBit, and the FBI couldn't review them.
• After her emails were subpoenaed, Hillary Clinton's email archive was also permanently deleted from her
then-server "PRN" with BleachBit, and the FBI couldn't review it.
• Also after the subpoena,
backups of the PRN server were manually deleted.
The FBI vs. Peter Navarro
Overview:
Dismantle the D.C.
Company Town. The news last week that Michael Sussmann was found not guilty by a D.C. jury of his ideological
peers was another thumb in the eye of the American so-called system of justice. [...] Sussmann joins a long list of Hillary
cronies and Department of Justice lackeys (but I repeat myself). In any just world Andrew McCabe, Lisa Page, Peter
Strzok, James Comey, Kevin Clinesmith, Loretta Lynch, and indeed Hillary herself would be behind bars. But this is our
world, not any just world. And here's some salt to rub in the wound. Peter Navarro, a former Trump economic
advisor, was held in contempt of Congress because he refused to hand over documents to the Kangaroo Court, er ... the
Democrat-controlled January 6 inquisition. Eric Holder, Barack Obama's self-declared "wingman" and Attorney General was
also held in contempt of Congress [in 2012] for refusing to hand over documents. [...] Navarro is not so lucky. He
lives next to the FBI building. They could have simply asked him to drop by. He would have showed up. But
that would not have been sufficiently dramatic. Instead, our geheime Staatspolizei apprehended him while he was
boarding a plane. They slapped the 72-year-old man in handcuffs and leg irons and threw him into a cell once occupied,
they were careful to tell him, by John Hinckley, the lunatic who shot Ronald Reagan in 1981. The timeline here deserves
our attention. On May 31, Navarro sued the January 6 committee and the DOJ. On June 3, he was
arrested and arraigned. Unlike Eric Holder, who merely scoffed at the contempt judgment, Navarro faces up to
two years in prison and a $200,000 fine.
Judge
rejects Navarro request to delay arraignment and orders limits on public statements. A federal judge rejected
former Trump White House adviser Peter Navarro's request for a delayed arraignment and issued a protective order limiting his
discussion of his Jan. 6 case Monday. District Court Judge Amit Mehta noted the public interest in the case and sided
with the federal prosecutors in determining that Navarro failed to make a strong argument for why a 45-day extension was
necessary. "The public interest weighs in favor of moving this case forward through its preliminary stages.
Whether or not counsel enters an appearance, the timing of these proceedings will be based on the factors the court is
required to consider, including Defendant's need for time to prepare his defense and the public interest in bringing this
matter to trial," Mehta wrote.
Dershowitz:
Peter Navarro Arrest 'Dangerous to Democracy'. Saturday [6/4/2022], [...] Harvard Law Professor Emeritus Alan
Dershowitz warned former Trump adviser Peter Navarro's arrest could impact American democracy. Dershowitz told Newsmax
TV's "The Count" Navarro's indictment was a "real scandal" given no judicial order was given for Navarro to testify that
resolved his claim of executive privilege. If it stands, Dershowitz said Republicans could use it in the same way their
Democrat counterparts have used it against Biden administration officials. "He has invoked a privilege," Dershowitz
explained. "It's as if somebody was called to testify about what he told his priest or his doctor or his lawyer, and he
invokes the privilege and immediately gets indicted, instead of the government going before a court and the judge rules
whether or not the privilege applies. If you rule the privilege doesn't apply and order him to testify, then he can be
held in contempt."
The
Week of Sussmann and Navarro. Last week we ordinary Americans took a couple of punches in the gut. First,
lawyer Michael Sussmann was acquitted by a jury of lying to the FBI about who was employing him to dish dirt on Candidate
Trump's 2016 presidential campaign. [...] And then the Biden administration did the thug thing on 72-year-old Trump White
House official Peter Navarro and had the FBI arrest him while he was boarding a plane and put him in handcuffs and leg irons,
just so they could make quite sure to have him in court the next day. Now, I have to say I am not outraged by
this. No, my reaction is far deeper and philosophical. The whole point of the legal system is to invite everyone,
Inner Party, Outer Party, and Proles, to bring their disputes to judges and juries — presided over by the
blindfolded maiden and her scales — rather than resort to revenge and armed gangs. But if an Inner Party
chappie gets a free ride, and the Outer Party chappie gets leg irons, what is the fate of the Proles in Biden's
America? Hey, ruling class: you may not think about where this injustice leads, but I can.
The
Structural Legal Rot Runs Deep. [Scroll down] It's beyond the collapse of academia and K-12 education,
the evisceration of our military, government waste, the dysfunction of our health system, and the one-sidedness of media
coverage. It goes to the very heart of our legal system. This week Peter Navarro was charged by a D.C. grand jury
for contempt of Congress for refusing to cooperate with the House Select Committee, a purely partisan confection of Nancy
Pelosi in violation of all the traditional House rules, and a clear propaganda operation. (Mark Meadows and Dan Scavino,
Jr. cooperated to some extent and were spared. The committee also referred them for prosecution, but the department of
Justice declined to prosecute them.) The charge against Navarro is a misdemeanor process crime but with significant
possible consequences. Instead of following the normal procedure in such cases of notifying the person charged and
allowing them to report for processing, the FBI affected to humiliate him, arrested him as he was boarding a plane and
publicly handcuffing him and placing him in leg irons.
Navarro
arrest is a Democrat assault on American liberty. The arrest of Peter Navarro by the FBI, shock troops of the
radical Democrat party, should make clear to the most hidebound Republican member of Congress that the anti-Constitution
cabal is confident it will maintain power after the November 8 elections, and the presidency for decades to come. As
Breitbart pointed out, the June 3 arrest of the freedom-loving Navarro came one day after he predicted that, following the
midterms, the impeachment of Biden will take place by the GOP. He was arrested for defying the assault on liberty that is
the January 6 House Inquisition panel.
Former
Trump Sr. Advisor Dr. Peter Navarro Arrested By FBI At Airport Only One Day After Mocking the "Kangaroo" J6
Committee. Yesterday, Harvard-educated Economist and former Sr. Trump Advisor Dr. Peter Navarro went
toe-to-toe with the snarky MSNBC activist Ari Melber over his decision to thumb his nose at the "kangaroo" Jan 6 Committee's
request to appear before them. In the interview, Navarro explained to the sniveling MSNBC host that even though he
didn't believe in these make-believe congressional gangs who are acting as "judge, jury, and prosecutor," he would use the
same tactics against Democrats on the "kangaroo" committee when Republicans take back Congress and the White House.
"You can bet your ass that I will lead the charge" to subpoena Democrats if Republicans return to power in Washington," he
said. "We'll start with the impeachment of Biden for Ukraine, the southern border, all manner of things he is guilty
of, and we'll subpoena his senior staff," Navarro told Melber.
Joe
Biden Begins Using FBI to Arrest Political Opposition from Prior Administration. Peter Navarro was the former
Senior Trade and Economic Advisor to President Trump and a staunch critic former of U.S. policy toward China. The
January 6th Commission demanded all his documented communication with President Trump and anything that might be related to
the authorities of the J-6 Committee. Navarro did not comply with the Democrat subpoena from the committee.
Attorney General Merrick Garland, acting on the authority of Joe Biden, instructed the FBI to arrest Peter Navarro and bring
him to federal incarceration. Put in more clear terms, Joe Biden is arresting his political opposition for failing to
reveal confidential and privileged communication with the former President. Democrats are using the FBI as the federal
police agency to arrest their political opposition. This is happening right now.
Former
Trump Official Peter Navarro Handcuffed and Put in Leg Irons by FBI, Joe Biden State Police Force. Former economic and
trade advisor Peter Navarro appeared outside the courthouse in Washington DC after his arrest. [Two video clips]
Subpoena
wars: Washington is on a path to mutually assured destruction. In an initial court appearance following
his arrest on Friday for contempt of Congress, former Trump adviser Peter Navarro stood before an obviously concerned federal
magistrate. "Every time that you're speaking," Judge Zia Faruqui tried to explain, "it could mean potentially putting
yourself at risk." It was entirely sensible advice about self-protection — and it was promptly ignored.
Navarro, 72, went directly outside and blasted the charge against him, the Democrats, and the FBI. Judge Faruqui's
concern was almost charmingly naive. We live in an age of the sensational, not the sensible. The Navarro case is
just one skirmish in a subpoena war engulfing Washington. No one seems to be thinking much beyond the next election.
News and timely commentary about the FBI regarding their routine work
Who Are the
Real Insurrectionists? In the fashion of the former East German Stasi, the FBI hounds political opponents on
the Right by surveilling parents at school board meetings, sending a SWAT team to arrest a flamboyant Trump supporter Roger
Stone, arriving at the house of journalist James O'Keefe in the deep of night to confiscate his files and devices, and
putting former White House advisor Peter Navarro in veritable shackles. The common denominator is the FBI devolving
into a retrieval service for the Biden family syndicate, whether by putting on ice Hunter Biden's incriminating laptop or
hounding out Ashley Biden's lurid diary or intimidating Biden critics. Yet when asked to produce relevant cell phones
of possibly wayward agents, the FBI claims that such data was erased, shrugs, and does not comply. Apparently, the FBI
leadership fears the progressive Washington political-bureaucratic-media nexus far more than it fears the consequences of
violating the law it is sworn to uphold.
Biden
Has Weaponized the FBI and DOJ Against His Political Opponents — The GOP Needs To End It. On June 23,
federal agents stormed the Virginia home of former Department of Justice official and legal scholar Jeffrey Clark in the early
morning hours, searching his house and seizing multiple electronic devices in the process. And on June 27, news broke
of the FBI executing a search warrant on June 22 against legal scholar and professor John Eastman for his role in advising
the Trump administration on legally contesting the 2020 presidential elections. (Eastman has filed a motion for return of
property, claiming that the federal agent refused to show him their search warrant before seizing his cell phone, as required by
the law.) Clark and Eastman, like tens of millions of other Americans, wanted to determine if voter irregularities may
have played a role in the 2020 presidential election. Clark, as a member of the Justice Department, and Eastman as a
Trump advisor, explored legal remedies that involved fielding alternate electors in states with contested elections.
That they should or should not have done this is open to opinion, but it was not at all illegal.
FBI
Ambushes Trump Election Lawyer John Eastman as He's Exiting Restaurant with His Wife, Seizes His Phone. The
January 6 Committee sent the feds after Trump lawyer John Eastman because he dared to take action against the Democrats and
their massive election fraud operation in 2020. Trump's election lawyer John Eastman said the FBI searched and seized
his phone last week, according to a new court filing. Eastman filed a federal lawsuit in New Mexico on Monday and asked
a judge to order the feds to return his property and block the January 6 investigators from accessing his phone.
According to the court filing, John Eastman was exiting a restaurant with his wife and friend last week when FBI agents
ambushed him and "forced" him to unlock his phone.
Revived
by appeals court, lawsuit against FBI informant illuminates Russia probe's weakness. A federal appeals court
has breathed new life into a lawsuit brought by a London-based academic against one of the FBI's confidential informants
during the Russia collusion probe, litigation that is likely to focus new attention on the quality of evidence that led the
bureau to investigate former President Donald Trump and his cohorts during the 2016 election. There has been a flurry
of new legal activity this month in Svetlana Lokhova's lawsuit in federal court in Virginia against former FBI confidential
human source Stefan Halper since the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals concluded U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema abused her
authority in dismissing the lawsuit a year ago. "We conclude that the court could not have properly concluded that
Lokhova's complaint ... had absolutely no chance of success," the appeals court ruled in April in a unanimous 3-0 decision that
reversed Brinkema's dismissal of the case and her order of a penalty against Lokhova for filing an allegedly frivolous lawsuit.
Chuck
Grassley slams Justice Department for not prosecuting employees for lying. Ranking Senate Judiciary Committee
member Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) slammed the Department of Justice on Monday for "repeated failure to prosecute employees" who
were caught lying during internal investigations. "An unsettling pattern has emerged from the Department of Justice
(DOJ) whereby criminal referrals by the Department of Justice, Office of Inspector General (OIG), against DOJ employees for
making materially false statements are rarely prosecuted," Grassley wrote in a letter to Attorney General Merrick
Garland. Grassley said the "most shocking example of this pattern" occurred last month after the DOJ declined to bring
charges against the former FBI agents who botched the investigation of Dr. Larry Nassar, the former U.S. women's
national gymnastics team physician who was sentenced to prison for assaulting gymnasts. The Iowa Republican listed a
dozen other cases in which the United States Attorney's Office declined to prosecute staffers.
FBI
Raids Target Democrats' Political Foes Instead Of True Criminals. The only apparent criterion the FBI needs to
raid the homes of American citizens is that those citizens have ever supported former President Donald Trump. Here are
the names of some of the political leaders on the right that the FBI has targeted: Roger Stone, Rudy Giuliani, James
O'Keefe, and Jeff Clark. The FBI is now also engaging in raids on private homes of elderly Americans who peacefully
attended the Capitol protest on Jan. 6, 2020. Compare this treatment to that of actual criminals affiliated with
Democrats, such as Hunter Biden, Andy McCabe, Peter Strzok, and Michael Sussmann. The latter have seen no personal
visit from the FBI since their crimes were committed or exposed.
Feds
Raid the Home of Former Trump DOJ Official Who Wanted to Investigate Allegations of Voter Fraud. In a pre-dawn
raid Wednesday, armed federal law enforcement agents searched the home of Jeffrey Clark, a former Trump Justice Department
official who has emerged as a central figure in the partisan House Select Committee's investigation into the January 6
riot. Clark's name was expected to come up in the Jan. 6 Committee hearing on Thursday. He served as acting
assistant attorney general for the Civil Division during President Trump's final months in office, where he was the only
official willing to investigate credible allegations of fraud. In a tweet back in March, Clark explained why he has
been targeted by the regime. "I'm a former Trump DOJ official who (like you) was concerned about the 2020 election," he
explained. "Now I'm one of the top targets of the politically motivated J6 Committee."
FBI
Raids Home of Retired Texas Couple Who Attended Jan. 6 Capitol Rally. A retired Texas couple said FBI agents on
June 22 broke through the gate of their rural home, threw flash-bangs, handcuffed them, and trained lasers on them before
searching their home for evidence connected to the Jan. 6, 2021, breach of the Capitol. Lora DeWolfe and Darrel
Kennemer, who live on seven acres near San Marcos, Texas, told The Epoch Times they attended the Jan. 6 rally at the Capitol
but did nothing wrong. They believe the FBI mistakenly identified Kennemer as someone else. The FBI didn't arrest
them, they said. Agents eventually produced a search warrant saying Kennemer was suspected of "assaulting, resisting or
impeding" officers and "entering restricted building or grounds." Both said they went no farther than the Capitol steps on
Jan. 6 and didn't harm anyone or damage anything.
Trump
DOJ official Jeffrey Clark tells Tucker Carlson that FBI raid on his house over efforts to overturn 2020 election was
'Stasi-like'. Former Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey Bossert Clark, who tried to help President Donald Trump
overturn his 2020 election loss, had his house searched by U.S. law enforcement agents on Wednesday, an experience which he
has described as 'Stasi-like.' In an interview with Tucker Carlson on Fox News, Clark shared his dismay at what he had
been subjected to as he was forced to stand outside his home in his pajamas while a search by armed federal agents took
place. He said: 'There was loud banging outside my door. I quickly figured out there were agents there. I
asked for the courtesy to put some pants on and was told 'no'. 'They swept the house. Twelve agents and two police
Fairfax County Police Officers searched it for more than three hours.
Joe
Biden's Weaponized FBI Seizes Phone of Nevada GOP Leader in Ridiculous Move. The weaponization of the FBI
continues after what some would describe as Joe Biden's personal police force seized the phone of a Nevada GOP leader on
Wednesday. That report comes via 8 News Now, a local station in the state. Per their sources, the FBI served a
search warrant on Michael McDonald, the Republican chairman in Nevada. They seized his phone in relation to an
"investigation" into the so-called "fake electors" scheme propagated after the 2020 election.
Five
Reasons to Impeach Joe Biden. [#4] Biden is directing the enforcement branches of the federal government
against his political enemies. Biden believes that "domestic political extremism" is "the most urgent terrorism threat"
facing the U.S. "The Biden administration declared that the 'most lethal elements' of today's domestic terror threat are
political conservatives," said Tucker Carlson. Biden has compared Americans who disagree with him — at least
half the country — to racists and terrorists. Consequently, Biden is empowering the DoJ and FBI to go after
Republicans. "The FBI is now an organization solely focused on destroying the domestic enemies of the Democratic
Party," said talk show host Jesse Kelly. Biden is also enlisting the media in his war against political
opponents. "What Joe Biden is telling media companies to do today is to censor their content so it doesn't contradict
his decrees," said Tucker Carlson. "[Biden is calling for] censorship of political opinions. What you're seeing here is
far more dangerous than the domestic terror threat they've been bloviating about. It contravenes the First Amendment."
Florida
woman who found Ashley Biden's diary in 'halfway house' is under FBI investigation for selling the journal. A
Florida woman who found Ashley Biden's private diary is being investigated by the FBI — not for stealing the
journal but for selling it, DailyMail.com has learned. The diary's explosive contents include Ashley's speculation that
showering with her father, then-Senator Joe Biden, as a young girl may have contributed to her sex addiction.
FBI
official had unauthorized contacts with reporters for years: DOJ watchdog. A top FBI national security
official involved in Crossfire Hurricane had dozens of unauthorized contacts with the media over several years, the
Department of Justice's watchdog concluded. Justice Department inspector general Michael Horowitz's office concluded in
a newly released investigative report that retired FBI official Michael Steinbach violated numerous bureau rules through his
meetings and communications with reporters, though prosecution against him was declined by DOJ. Steinbach had been
executive assistant director of the FBI's national security branch until his retirement in February 2017 and played a role in
the FBI's flawed Trump-Russia investigation.
Never
Forget — FBI Admitted to Running Operatives in the Crowd at the US Capitol — It was a
Setup. The FBI admitted in September 2021 to The New York Times that they had informants and operatives inside
groups attending the January 6 rallies in Washington DC. This never made it into the January 6 Committee's public show
trial of President Trump and his MAGA movement last Thursday night. The FBI finally admitted they infiltrated the Jan. 6
rallies with informants. In fact, one of the first "protesters" inside the US Capitol was an FBI informant.
Where's Ray Epps?
Since 1987, some of us have spent leisure time asking, "Where's Waldo?" looking for him in crowded cartoons clad in his red
and white striped shirt. It passes the time and stimulates the mind. Since January 6, 2021, others have asked,
"Where's Ray Epps?" Asking, "Where's Waldo?" is harmless enough. Asking, "Where's Ray Epps?" might get you the
kind of attention no one wants in this post-911 emerging police-state we still call America. Still, lots of questions
are popping up about Ray Epps. [...] In one video of Ray Epps taken on the evening of January 5, 2021, Ray is seen wearing a
red MAGA baseball cap and exhorting protestors to "Go into the Capitol." During the span of Jan 5-6, 2021, Epps can be seen
in several locations between the White House and the Capitol, urging people to enter the People's House. Like the
imaginary Waldo, Ray Epps shows up doing his old man impersonation of Ethan Hunt on a Mission Impossible episode. Like
the fictional Ethan Hunt, the Agency (FBI and DOJ) has disavowed any knowledge or connection with Ray Epps. For some
time, a picture of Epps appeared on an FBI website soliciting information about those who entered the Capitol on January
6th. That picture went up in a puff of smoke and, now, the FBI refuses to answer questions about him.
The
FBI knew RussiaGate was a lie — but hid that truth. Declassified for Durham's probe, a March 2017
memo prepared by Lisa Page for FBI head James Comey's meeting with Congress' "Gang of Eight" — the bipartisan
House and Senate leaders who oversee the most classified stuff — was a total cook-up job. It advised Comey
to present accusations that Trump's campaign chair Paul Manafort and foreign policy adviser Carter Page were working with the
Russian government as coming from a confidential Russia-based source with real intel-community chops. In fact, the FBI
had already established that the root source was US-based former Brookings flunky Igor Danchenko's utterly speculative gossip
with an ex-girlfriend and a Democratic Party hack. That, plus publicly reported info, was all Christopher Steele (a
retired British spy who doesn't even speak Russian) ever had to back up his "dossier." And the FBI knew it since
at least January 2017, when it interviewed Danchenko.
FBI
goes full Gestapo, raids home of leading GOP gubernatorial challenger to Michigan's Gretchen Whitmer. While the
FBI demonstrated oppressive, tyrannical behavior throughout the so-called "war on terror," since it was occurring in the wake
of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, most Americans either didn't notice or did not mind. After all, the bureau
was meting out the 'revenge' we all sought against Islamic terrorists who killed thousands of our countrymen, attacked our
seat of government, and destroyed an iconic symbol of our economic might. But the FBI did not stop with entrapping
alleged Islamic 'terrorists,' the bureau veered into full-bore corruption and today has become the modern-day equivalent of
Nazi Germany's Gestapo or Soviet East Germany's Stasi secret police — behaving more as political enforcers for the
left-wing deep state.
Pipe
bomber remains unidentified as Democrat-led Capitol riot committee begins public hearings. As the Democrat-led
committee investigating the events of Jan. 6 begins its public hearings, the person who planted pipe bombs the night before
outside both the Republican and Democratic national committee headquarters in Washington remains unknown and at large.
Now, almost a year and a half since the incident, the Washington Examiner learned that a top FBI official said last
month that the bureau could not provide any information about the possible use of confidential human sources to solve the
case. The FBI official said the bureau had carried out over 1,000 interviews, compiled just under 40,000 videos, and
analyzed roughly 450 tips. The bureau also said solving the mystery continues to be a top priority for the FBI, as well
as for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department, and the Capitol Police.
The Editor says...
The mysterious pipe bomber is either the stealthiest and most elusive criminal since Jack the Ripper, or is a federal agent whose identity is no
mystery to the FBI. Even Jack the Ripper would have been caught quickly, if he had lived in a city like Washington DC, where there are
surveillance cameras everywhere. I don't believe for a second that the government doesn't already know who this suspect is, and can't
figure out who it is, even after 18 months as everybody's top priority.
Biden's
G-men go rogue. The Biden Justice Department, led by Attorney General Merrick Garland, will not be prosecuting
lawbreakers within its ranks. The Inspector General (IG) for the Department of Justice (DOJ) released its semiannual
report to Congress of cases for which the IG recommends prosecutions. But in case after case, the DOJ is declining to
prosecute its own. The one notable exception is Bureau of Prisons (BOP) personnel, who still have reason to fear
repercussions if they break the law. But if you are in the FBI or DEA, you can be virtually assured you will not be
prosecuted, based on the long list of cases DOJ has declined to prosecute. Apparently, if you work for the right
agency, anything goes.
The Sovietization
of American Life. Experts become sycophantic. They mortgage their experience and talent to
ideology — to the point where society itself regresses. The law is no longer blind and disinterested, but
adjudicates indictment, prosecution, verdict, and punishment on the ideology of the accused. Eric Holder is held in
contempt of Congress and smiles; Peter Navarro is held in contempt of Congress and is hauled off in cuffs and leg-irons.
James Clapper and John Brennan lied under oath to Congress — and were rewarded with television contracts; Roger Stone
did the same and a SWAT team showed up at his home. Andrew McCabe made false statements to federal investigators and was
exempt. A set-up George Papadopoulos went to prison for a similar charge. So goes the new American commissariat.
Hillary's
Attorney 'Operated' an FBI Office at Law Firm, But Wait, It Gets Worse. Do you ever get the feeling that we're
playing checkers while our enemies are playing chess? That things are not as they seem? That's the way it feels
in the story of Spygate, the Trump-Russia collusion lie, FBI corruption, and the latest chapter of that entire sad and
duplicitous saga that was lived out in a D.C. courtroom this week. Hillary Clinton and Democratic National Committee
attorney Michael Sussmann was acquitted by a jury whose forewoman said she felt the special counsel team led by John Durham
should have better things to do than investigate a lawyer supposedly lying to the FBI about the president being a Russian spy.
Gaetz,
Jordan give Chris Wray deadline to explain 'special portal' to FBI from top Democrat law firm. U.S. Reps.
Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) and Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) insist that the Federal Bureau of Investigation has some explaining to do.
"We have learned that since March 2012, the FBI approved and facilitated a Secure Work Environment at Perkins Coie's
Washington, D.C. office, which continues to be operational," the ultra-MAGA duo reportedly wrote to the FBI. "In a letter
dated May 25, 2022, the law firm confirmed and acknowledged the arrangement." Perkins Coie is the Democrat-connected law
firm where Michael Sussmann, the Hillary Clinton campaign attorney who was found not guilty on Tuesday of lying to the FBI by
a liberal D.C. federal jury, was a former partner, in a case filed by Russiagate Special Counsel John Durham.
FBI
Altered Statement on Intrusion Into Democrat Network Based on Input From Democrat Lawyer. A lawyer representing
Democrats proposed alterations to an FBI statement on the hacking of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC)
to avoid undermining the narrative from his clients, according to emails released as part of the trial of former Hillary
Clinton campaign attorney Michael Sussmann. FBI officials in mid-2016 were drafting a statement regarding an alleged
intrusion into the (DCCC) network and sent the draft to Sussmann, a lawyer representing the DCCC, the Democratic National
Committee (DNC), and other Democrats. "Michael — our press office is once again getting a ton of calls on
the DCCC matter. A draft response is provided below. Wanted to get your thoughts on this prior to sending out,"
Jim Trainor, assistant director for the FBI Cyber Division, wrote to Sussmann on July 29, 2016. Sussmann zeroed in
on the first sentence, which he said seemed to undermine what the DCCC was saying about the reported intrusion.
Report:
FBI Has Maintained 'Secure Workspace' Inside Dem Law Firm Perkins Coie Since 2012. In response to a letter sent
by Reps Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) and Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), Perkins Coie, the legal arm of the Democrat party, admitted this week
that "the FBI has maintained a secure work environment within Perkins Coie offices" since 2012. A jury of Democrat donors
in Washington D.C. on Tuesday found Michael Sussmann, a former law partner at Perkins Coie, not guilty of making a false
statement to the FBI in September 2016 when he told the feds that he was not working on behalf of any client. Perkins
Coie told the Republicans in the letter that "the FBI is responsible for maintaining a secure work environment," Fox News
Host Tucker Carlson reported Tuesday night. "That work space — whatever it is — is still in
operation today," Carlson added.
The
Special Counsel Proved The FBI Belongs To The Swamp. Yesterday, after less than one full day of deliberations,
a D.C. jury stacked with pro-Hillary Clinton jurors acquitted former Clinton campaign attorney Michael Sussmann, proving the
FBI is not "ours" but the swamp's. Just more than two weeks ago, prosecutor Brittain Shaw began opening statements in
United States v. Sussmann, by stating the obvious: "Some people have very strong feelings about politics and about
Russia, and many people have strong feelings about Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton." "But we are not here because these
allegations involve either of them," Shaw continued. "Nor are we here because the defendant's client was the Clinton
campaign." Rather, "we are here because the FBI is our institution that should not be used as a political tool for anyone;
not Republicans, not Democrats, not anyone."
FBI
records on search for fabled gold raise more questions. A scientific analysis commissioned by the FBI shortly
before agents went digging for buried treasure suggested that a huge quantity of gold could be below the surface, according
to newly released government documents and photos that deepen the mystery of the 2018 excavation in remote western
Pennsylvania. The report, by a geophysicist who performed microgravity testing at the site, hinted at an underground
object with a mass of up to 9 tons and a density consistent with gold. The FBI used the consultant's work to obtain a
warrant to seize the gold — if there was any to be found. The government has long claimed its dig was a
bust. But a father-son pair of treasure hunters who spent years hunting for the fabled Civil War-era gold —
and who led agents to the woodland site, hoping for a finder's fee — suspect the FBI double-crossed them and made
off with a cache that could be worth hundreds of millions of dollars.
Was
the Buffalo shooter groomed by the FBI to commit mass murder? The FBI's fingerprints are all over the Buffalo
mass shooting. A local news report from the Buffalo News has linked a retired federal agent to the shooting because he
apparently knew about it at least 30 minutes before it occurred. The former agent, believed to be from Texas, is said
to be under investigation for direct communications he had previously had with Payton Gendron, the alleged shooter. The
former agent, along with at least six other individuals, engaged with Gendron in an online chat room "where racist hatred was
discussed," the Buffalo News reported. Two law enforcement sources with direct knowledge of the investigation were
supposedly petitioned by Gendron to read about his mass shooting plans (why do these alleged shooters always seem to have
full-length manifestos outlining in detail their future crimes?). It is unclear at this point whether or not the retired
agent accepted the invitation. What we are being told is that law enforcement is once again involved, which points to
this potentially being yet another government false flag attack with suspicious roots.
Why
Was A "Retired" FBI Agent Talking Online With The Buffalo Shooter? What's an FBI agent doing on Discord
chatting with a mass shooter during his retirement? Is that how you would spend your time during your golden
years? What's even more incredible is that the FBI agent did not call the FBI to warn anyone about the planned shooting.
A Cabinency
of Dunces. In the days before the recent Virginia election, grassroots parent groups challenged critical race
theory taught in the schools. In reaction and under prompts from teachers' unions, Attorney General Merrick Garland
directed both the FBI and the Justice Department to establish a special task force apparently to "investigate threats" from
parents against school board members. The FBI recently has been knee-deep in political controversies. It
illegally doctored a FISA application to entrap an American citizen. Its former directors, under oath before Congress,
either claimed faulty memory or admitted lying to federal investigators. The last thing a scandal-plagued FBI needed
was to go undercover at school board meetings to investigate parents worried over their children's education.
It
Took FBI Less Than A Day To Discover Trump Conspiracy Theory Was Bogus. An FBI agent said Tuesday that it took
him and another agent "less than a day" to determine the allegation about former President Donald Trump having ties to a
Russian financial institution was false and pushed by Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussman. FBI Supervisory
Special Agent Scott Hellman said "it took him and another agent less than a day to ascertain the data and 'white papers' on
two thumb drives Sussmann gave Baker did not support the Trump-Alfa Bank 'secret connection' allegation," according to The
Epoch Times' national affairs reporter John Haughey. Hellman was on the stand during the first day of Sussman's trial
for allegedly lying to the FBI.
Hunter
Biden laptop repairman says FBI 'didn't seem interested' in reviewing hard drive. John Paul Mac Isaac, the
laptop repair shop owner who serviced Hunter Biden's laptop in April 2019, is speaking out about the treatment his father
received from the FBI when he attempted to inform the agency of the findings on the laptop. In an excerpt provided to
Fox News Digital from his forthcoming book, "American Injustice: My Battle to Expose the Truth," Isaac describes his
father's encounter with a "two-tiered justice system" that "didn't seem interested" in reviewing the laptop's contents and
advised him to "lawyer up" and not discuss his findings with anyone.
There
was Another Mass Shooting in America. You Didn't Hear About It Because the Suspect is a Chinese
Communist. The Buffalo shooting could more accurately be described as another missed case of glaring mental
illness combined with the F.B.I. once again dropping the ball. "New details have emerged regarding the alleged threat
that accused Buffalo mass shooter Payton Gendron made in June 2021, leading the teenager to undergo a required mental health
evaluation at a local hospital," Fox News reported on Monday [5/16/2022]. "Payton Gendron, now 18, said he wanted 'to
commit a murder-suicide' in June 2021, prompting New York State Police to respond to the local high school and take the teen
into custody, said Stephen Belongia, special agent-in-charge of the FBI's Buffalo Field Office," the report added.
Sadly, the American people are no longer surprised by such F.B.I. incompetence and malfeasance. Reports about the
agency's corruption and hyper-politicization under Attorney General Merrick Garland are commonplace.
Whistleblower
document shows how corrupt FBI has been 'monitoring' certain news media. The FBI has proven time and again that
it is no longer a federal law enforcement agency but rather nothing short of being a politicized protector of the deep
state. When it isn't trying to entrap conservatives into fake crimes, apparently the agency has been monitoring media
outlets considered hostile to the regime, according to a document supplied by a whistleblower to investigative journalistic
operation Project Veritas. [...] According to the document, which was also published by the group, the FBI opened a probe
into Project Veritas "knowing full well they were journalists as the document is labeled under a 'news media'
classification," the press release notes further, which begs the question: Unless for counter-espionage reasons, why
would any agency of the federal government 'investigate' any news organization, ever? The press release
goes on to note that the media classification is a direct contradiction to a court filing from the government in which the
Biden regime argued that actions taken by the feds to surveil, raid and then seize materials from Project Veritas journalists
were appropriate and proper.
FBI
Investigated Concerned Parents. You all remember the story: the Biden Department of Justice coordinated with
the National School Boards Association to arrange for FBI investigations of parents who are unhappy about their local schools
teaching racism and anti-Americanism (Critical Race Theory) and gender confusion, and requiring masks. The episode was
so sordid that many state school board associations dropped their affiliation with NSBA, and most people doubted that the FBI
would be craven enough to follow Attorney General Merrick Garland's patently unconstitutional directive. But follow it
they did. Yesterday [5/11/2022] Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee, acting on tips from unhappy FBI agents,
wrote Merrick Garland to criticize the diversion of FBI resources to investigations of parents who dissent from "woke"
ideology and care about their children's education.
FBI
Whistleblower: The Direction of the Bureau 'Troubles a Vast Majority of the Agents'. A whistleblower from
the Federal Bureau of Investigation told Project Veritas founder and President James O'Keefe in a recorded interview posted
late Wednesday that the FBI's "direction" in recent months "troubles a vast majority of the agents." The source —
a current FBI agent with counterintelligence, counterterrorism and criminal experience — came forward with new
information about the FBI's investigation into Project Veritas over Ashley Biden's lost diary. Armed FBI agents raided and
ransacked two Project Veritas journalists' homes on November 4, on the orders of federal prosecutors from the U.S. Attorney's
Office for the Southern District of New York, and raided O'Keefe's apartment in Mamaroneck, N.Y., a couple of days later in
connection with the allegedly stolen diary.
FBI
opened multiple investigations into protesting parents, GOP lawmakers say. The FBI has opened multiple
investigations into parents protesting education policies, including a father who was upset over mask mandates, according to
new whistleblower revelations. The FBI's activities were publicly revealed in a letter Wednesday from Republicans on
the House Judiciary Committee to Attorney General Merrick Garland. The specifics of the FBI's investigations were disclosed
to lawmakers by whistleblowers. Garland directed the FBI and the Department of Justice to form a joint task force in
October 2021 to investigate threats against school board members after the National School Boards Association asked the Biden
administration in a September 2021 letter to investigate parents protesting at school board meetings as domestic terrorists
under the Patriot Act.
Whistleblowers
Allege FBI Investigated Parents Opposed to School COVID-19 Policies. Whistleblowers have alleged that the FBI
conducted dozens of investigations into American parents who expressed opposition to schools' COVID-19 mandates, and labeled
them with a "threat tag," House Judiciary Committee Republicans claimed in a letter on Wednesday [5/11/2022]. Reps.
Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and Mike Johnson (R-La.) wrote in a letter to the Justice Department that the "brave whistleblowers" from
the FBI had informed them that the agency had reportedly created an internal threat tag called "EDUOFFICIALS" in October 2021
to track alleged threats against school boards, following an Oct. 4 directive from Attorney General Merrick Garland.
That directive came in response to a request from the National School Boards Association asking that the federal government
use counterterrorism tools, including the Patriot Act, to target parents at school board meetings, the representatives wrote.
FBI:
Russian cyberthreat fueled almost 2M warrantless searches of Americans' data in 2021. The threat of cyberattack
from Russia fueled more than half of the FBI's 3.39 million warrantless searches of Americans' data last year, according to a
government report. The warrantless searches, legal under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, were up sharply
from approximately 1.32 million reported in 2020, according to the report, published Friday by the Office of the Director of
National Intelligence. Almost all of the increase can be traced to one Russian cyberthreat to critical U.S.
infrastructure in 2021. The FBI's response to the threat accounted for approximately 1.9 million searches.
Here's
How The DOJ And FBI Are Spending Their Time Instead Of Rooting Out Actual Extremists. The FBI never managed to
thwart the NYC subway shooting suspect, who allegedly posted hours of extremist black nationalist and violent rhetoric on
YouTube, but has repeatedly allocated resources to chasing hoaxes and false leads. The FBI and Department of Justice
(DOJ) have spent their efforts plotting an operation to kidnap a governor, busting out a team of 15 agents to investigate a
rope in a NASCAR garage and investigating parents at school boards meetings as domestic terrorists, among other failed
operations. The FBI has also denied knowing about the whereabouts of Hunter Biden's laptop. The man responsible
for allegedly opening fire in a New York City subway car Tuesday walked away from the scene of the crime and, after waiting
for the authorities to do something, decided to turn himself in, reportedly sitting on a bench relaxing before the NYPD
nabbed him. "I'm Frank, I'm the person you're looking for. I'm surprised it took so long," Frank James, the
alleged shooter, told police as they arrested him, according to the New York Post. James evaded arrest for over 24
hours despite hundreds of NYPD officers working to find him.
FBI
Blows It Again: Knew About Subway Terrorist's Racist Videos and Had Him on Watch List. We're learning
more information by the moment about the New York subway train shooter who allegedly wounded ten people in a terror attack
during Tuesday morning's commute in Brooklyn. But, we're also learning that the FBI knew in advance about this
terrorist monster who set off diversionary smoke bombs before he emptied his semi-automatic pistol on commuters. Frank
James was on their terror watch list, but it appears nobody was watching the terrorist.
Hey
FBI, We're Running Low on Those White Domestic Terrorists You Keep Warning Us About. While it's true that I am
not a big fan of the federal government, it's not as if I'm rooting against every person who works in it. That applies
especially to those in law enforcement. In fact, I'd rather they be able to do their jobs well. It's the ones at
the top who are usually problematic. They end up being generic, soulless bureaucrats after a while, forgetting whatever
ideals of public service they may have had when they started out. Bureaucrats love Democrats because Democrats are all
about bloating and maintaining the bureaucracy. That explains why federal law enforcement continues to perpetuate the
myth that the biggest threat to our safety here in America is lurking in the form of crazy white guy extremists, which is
Leftspeak for "Trump voters." [...] Here's the thing though: if you look around lately at the real threats to public
safety, none of the suspects fit the "right-wing nutjob extremist" profile.
Disturbing
Video From Black Nationalist Subway Shooter Revealed as FBI Gets Egg on Its Face Again. Per RedState's
reporting, we know a lot more about the man who allegedly donned a gas mask, popped a smoke grenade, and started shooting
people in a New York City subway on Tuesday [4/12/2022]. The man's name is Frank R. James, and his political leanings
appear to be highly relevant to why he carried out the attack. Further, he was known to the FBI but "cleared" in 2019
of posing any kind of threat, and shock of all shocks, the authorities are once again pretending the motive here is a total
mystery. [Tweets] Recall that the Waukesha massacre assailant, who killed six people, including a child, after ramming
his SUV into a Christmas parade, was also an outspoken black nationalist who had talked about killing white people. To
this day, we have never received any official statement on his motivation. You can expect that to happen again in this
case, as it appears the FBI has an aversion to labeling crimes that may prove inconvenient to the left.
The
Brooklyn Subway Terror Attack Shooter Was On FBI's Terrorist Radar Until 2019 - No MSM Coverage. New York City
police named a "person of interest" in the shooting Tuesday morning aboard a subway train in Brooklyn. Ten people were
shot and 13 others were injured after a man wearing a gas mask threw two smoke canisters and then opened fire aboard a subway
car on the N train as it approached the 36th Street Station in Brooklyn during the morning rush hour, authorities said. [...]
The mainstream media claims that this wasn't a terror attack, however recent social media post, as well as the exclusive
video that we have from James, shows that his attack was a hate crime that could be labeled as terrorism because he injured
more than one person! Like the Waukesha suspect & the Louisville BLM activist who allegedly tried to assassinate a
mayoral candidate, he appeared to be a fan of black nationalism.
FBI
now protecting child murderers by arresting whistleblowers who point them out. Are federal law enforcement
agencies fighting crime or promoting it? According to veteran pro-life activist Randall Terry, the authorities are
actually the bad guys. Both the Department of Justice (DoJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) targeted
pro-lifers, he says, who discovered and reported fetal remains outside a Washington, D.C., abortion clinic. Instead of
going after the criminal perpetrators who left the remains of murdered unborn children on the street, the DoJ and the FBI
instead went after the whistleblowers who reported it. "These people contacted local authorities and then suddenly the
DoJ comes in with the FBI to arrest them," Terry stated at an April 5 press conference.
The
FBI Is a Den of Scum and Villainy. The FBI has been in steady decline for decades. Now the FBI is a
joke. Populated with political hacks and agents willingly creating crimes to make criminals, it is a shell of what it
once was, or what we thought it should be. "Entrapment" is a defense to a crime that almost never flies, but it did in
Michigan because it was perfectly clear that the Bureau created the plot to kidnap Whitmer. When agents aren't
entrapping dummies in Michigan they're after moms who don't want their children ruined.
Dislike,
Thumbs Down, Unfollow: [The] FBI [is] Spending $27M on Social Media Tracking. Here's an update to share on
your preferred social media platform: the FBI is watching. According to a new report from the Washington Post, the
FBI is going all in on social media monitoring, spending nearly $30 million dollars to prevent another January 6.
Privacy watchdogs and civil liberties advocates are concerned — and they should be. This is crazy.
The FBI has purchased 5,000 licenses to use Babel X; a supercharged web crawler made by a company called Babel Street.
"The Justice Department has previously [used] Babel X... but the new contract appears to be by far the most the agency has ever
shelled out for the software, and is one of the largest contracts for the software by a civilian agency," WaPo reports. So
what does the FBI get for $30 mil and 5,000 licenses? Access to 40 online sources, including no-brainers like Instagram,
fringe Korean social media platforms, and "dark web" monitoring.
Has
the FBI ever before looked this pitiful? It's one thing for the FBI, once considered the pre-eminent law
enforcement agency in the world, to turn to the dark side and become the secret police of the Democrat party. Again and
again, the FBI has shown its partisan colors, overlooking obvious Democrat criminality (see Clinton, Hillary, and
Biden, Hunter) while chasing after Donald Trump and his supporters like Brian Stelter chasing down a Mister Softee
truck for seconds. But although it's unsettling to know that the FBI is only supporting one side of the political
aisle, what's truly incredible is how bad the Feebs are at partisan warfare. Forget stopping actual terrorists, like
the ones involved in 9/11, Orlando, and San Bernadino; recent history tells us the Bureau can't even run a coup right.
Under a previous director as tall as he was self-righteous, the FBI tried to take down presidential candidate Donald Trump
(R-MAGA) with the infamous Russia Collusion scam. But what a lousy effort it was!
Companies
were slow to remove Russian spies' malware, so FBI did it for them. The FBI remotely accessed and disinfected
US-located devices running a powerful new strain of Russian state botnet malware, federal authorities said Wednesday.
Those authorities added that the Kremlin was using the malware to wage stealthy hacks of its adversaries. The infected
devices were primarily made up of firewall appliances from WatchGuard and, to a lesser extent, network devices from
Asus. Both manufacturers recently issued advisories providing recommendations for hardening or disinfecting devices
infected by the botnet, known as Cyclops Blink. It is the latest botnet malware from Russia's Sandworm, which is among
the world's most elite and destructive state-sponsored hacking outfits.
Leftist
Infiltration of the Police Will Lead To Tyranny. In a free society, the police are guardians of
democracy. The radical Left must destroy belief in these principles to establish an organization that will support the
efforts of a totalitarian government and violate the rights of the public on behalf of the ruling elites. This has
already happened with our FBI, which is so thoroughly corrupted that it essentially functions as a political secret
police. Crooked leadership resulted in the agency's participation in the now utterly discredited Russian collusion hoax
to undermine President Trump, investigating and intimidating parents as domestic terrorists for speaking out at local school
board meetings, and the relentless persecution of nonviolent January 6 protesters. The FBI is a disgrace. But
when local law enforcement is subverted by leftist ideology, misconduct rises to another level. The results can
be brutal and deadly.
How
does the FBI 'lose' a laptop like Hunter Biden's? Some things don't make sense. That brings us to some
testimony from the FBI's assistant director for cyber-security, who told Congress's Rep. Matt Gaetz that he had no idea
where Hunter Biden's laptop, entrusted to FBI custody, actually is. [...] "I don't know who has it," said [FBI Assistant
Director for the Cyber Division Bryan] Vorndran. [...] Vorndran should be embarrassed. The whereabouts of this laptop
are something he should know. Even if he doesn't have it, he should know who does have it because it's a computer
matter that likely affects his job of protecting the country from cyber-attacks.
The
FBI 'Doesn't Know' Where Hunter's Laptop Is. "So where is it? The Laptop?" Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.)
clown-slapped the assistant director of the FBI's Cyber Division, Bryan A. Vorndran, on Tuesday [3/29/2022] when Vorndran
admitted he didn't have "any information" on the whereabouts of Hunter Biden's "laptop from hell." [Tweet with
video clip] Vorndran told Congress he didn't know where the laptop is, nor does he even know who SHOULD know the
whereabouts of the laptop. Weird, considering he IS the assistant director of the FBI's Cyber Division. Gaetz
mentioned the laptop's "international business deals, kickbacks, and shakedowns" that might potentially hurt the Biden family.
Director
of FBI Cyber Has No Idea Where Hunter Biden Laptop Is Located. I would say this is sketchy but given everything
that has been revealed about the FBI in recent years the point would be moot. We still have no idea where the Huma
Abedin/Anthony Weiner laptop is located after the FBI took custody of it. During a congressional hearing today, GOP
Congressman Matt Gaetz asked FBI cyber chief Bryan Vorndran if he knows where Hunter Biden's laptop is stored. The head
of the FBI cyber operations said he has no idea. [Video clip]
FBI
cyber chief admits to not knowing what the agency has done with Hunter Biden's seized laptop.
Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) got into a heated spat over the whereabouts of Hunter Biden's laptop during a House Judiciary
hearing on oversight of the FBI's Cyber Division on Tuesday [3/29/2022]. The Republican firebrand used his allotted
time to grill the division's assistant director Bryan Vorndran, who repeatedly told Gaetz he didn't have any information on
where the hard drive belonging to President Joe Biden's son is currently located. At one point Gaetz tried to enter the
hard drive into the Congressional record but was blocked by House Judiciary Chair Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.), who
changed his mind a short while later.
How to Make
Crime Vanish. No sooner do we note here the out-of-control crime in San Francisco (and elsewhere in California)
than we find a magical solution appear: stop collecting and reporting crime data! Yesterday the FBI released its
quarterly uniform crime report. There appears this curious note on the home page: ["]The Quarterly Uniform
Crime Report was made available on March 21, 2022. For this quarterly release, due to agency participation being under
the 60 percent threshold, data trends by region and aggregate population group will not be available. Data from
individual city agencies with populations of 100,000 or greater can be accessed in the Resources section below.["]
In other words, if I read this right not enough law enforcement agencies sent in the data required for the FBI to provide
national statistics. Maybe this is a consequence of cutting police budgets. That's one way of reducing the crime rate!
Feds
pay $128M to families after FBI bungled tips about Parkland school shooter. The federal government will pay a
$127.5 million settlement over the Parkland, Fla. school massacre — after it admitted the FBI didn't follow up
on two tips that could have prevented the massacre. The legal deal announced Wednesday [3/16/2022] settles 40 lawsuits
tied to the 2018 massacre at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, which remains the largest high school shooting in US history.
The Department of Justice did not admit fault in the shootings, and the settlement "resolved all the cases" filed against the
government by family members of the 16 shooting victims and all the survivors of the attack, a news release said.
Secret
Service says it doesn't have Hunter Biden emails from some years, his laptop says otherwise. Days ahead of his
trip to Mexico in spring 2011, Hunter Biden got an email from a Secret Service agent coordinating his protection
detail. "Hunter, when you have some free time, I would like to discuss the Monterrey trip with you," Secret Service
agent Yvonne DiCristoforo wrote then-Vice President Joe Biden's son on April 28, 2011. "I have some specific information
to provide you that we received from our Mexico City office," she added. "I know you are out of the office this
evening, but if you could contact me at your convenience, I would appreciate it." Secret Service records show Hunter
Biden, in fact, took the trip with agents protecting him between May 15 to May 17, 2011. The email, contained on a
Hunter Biden laptop now in FBI custody and reviewed by Just the News, may not seem that significant at first blush. But
it has significant meaning to Senate investigators.
Video
of Unconstitutional FBI Raid on Project Veritas Journalist's Home; Armed Agents Scream 'Let Me See Your Hands!'
Project Veritas released never-before-seen footage of last November's FBI raid on the home of one its journalists. The
shocking footage shows the tense moments when several agents banged on the door screaming, "Open up!" Once the
journalist opened the door, several FBI agents shouted, "Let me see your hands!" [Video clip] Agents are
seen on the footage clutching weapons and tossing belongings after a brief conversation with the journalist. The raid
stems from a Project Veritas decision to investigate a diary that belonged to then Presidential candidate Joe Biden's daughter
Ashley. The Department of Justice executed the tense raids despite Project Veritas' decision not to publish the diary's
contents and to turn it over to authorities.
The Editor says...
As a public service, I would like to present the following half-baked idea. Somebody should invent this, if it
doesn't already exist: If there is any possibility that the police, the feds, the Mafia, or some combination of all three
are coming after you, perhaps you should set up a video recorder inside your house, with the cameras pointed at the front door
and the area immediately inside the house where all the shouting, flash-bang grenades, and senseless killing of your dog are likely
to occur. Here are a few pro tips for your system: [#1] The video recorder should discard anything older than
three or four hours, so it never runs out of storage space. [#2] Sound-activated lighting, or supplemental lights
triggered by a battering ram on the front door, would be very helpful. [#3] High-definition video is a must, because
the video will be all over the news media, and will eventually be shown to a jury. Home invasions are always unscheduled.
Be prepared.
Republicans
demand answers on FBI operations after audit reveals rules broken in investigations. House Republicans said
Tuesday [3/15/2022] that they want answers about the FBI's operations after an internal audit revealed agents flouting the
rules during investigations involving politicians, candidates, religious groups, news media and others. FBI agents
broke their own rules at least 747 times in 18 months while conducting sensitive investigations, according to an internal
2019 FBI audit first reported by The Washington Times. Rep. Andy Biggs, Arizona Republican, said the audit's
findings should not come as a surprise. "The FBI has strayed away from its core mission of protecting the American
people and upholding the Constitution of the United States," Mr. Biggs said in a statement.
Jim
Jordan seeks FBI briefing after 'whistleblower disclosure' on DC pipe bomb investigation. A top House
Republican is asking the FBI for a briefing after a special agent came forward with a disclosure about the bureau's
investigation into a pair of pipe bombs planted outside the GOP's and Democratic Party's headquarters in Washington, D.C.,
the night before the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. Rep. Jim Jordan, an Ohio Republican and ranking member of the House
Judiciary Committee, sent a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray on Wednesday saying this "whistleblower disclosure"
revealed that the FBI's Washington Field Office asked FBI field offices last month to canvass all confidential human sources
nationwide for relevant information.
FBI
Quietly Drops Charges Against J6 Defendant Who Committed Suicide. January 6 defendant Matthew Perna was looking
at some serious jail time for a peaceful walk through the Capitol. Killers have gotten way less severe sentences, like
this fine lad, who punched and killed an elderly man who allegedly called him a bad name: [Tweet] Perna didn't punch
an elderly man, causing his death. Nor was he looking at two years of house arrest. Perna was looking at 51 months
in federal prison for entering the Capitol for five to ten minutes, snapping selfies, and chanting "USA" in an apparently seditious
way. He also tapped a window with a pole but didn't break it or anything else. He didn't hit a cop. The FBI
magnanimously decided to drop their charges against Perna on Wednesday [3/9/2022].
DOJ
Documents Obtained by Judicial Watch Confirm Existence of Communications Between FBI & Pfizer about Project
Veritas. Project Veritas has been made aware of Department of Justice Freedom of Information/Privacy Acts
("FOIPA") response letters which shockingly appear to confirm that there is some level of communication between federal
officials at the Bureau and pharmaceutical giant Pfizer about Project Veritas. The letters, which were originally
obtained by Judicial Watch resulting from FOIA requests made by the legal watchdog group requesting communications between
Pfizer and the FBI about Project Veritas cite separate reasons for rejecting the request. While the second letter
attempts to avoid acknowledging the existence of such communications by citing "an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy,"
the first response letter from the Department of Justice revealed more information.
Clueless:
Woke FBI Downplays Anti-Semitic Aspect of Hostage-Taking at Texas Synagogue. The jihadi who stormed the
Congregation Beth Israel synagogue in Colleyville, Texas, and took hostages Saturday, demanding the release of convicted
jihad terrorist Aafia Siddiqui, is dead, and the hostages are safe. And now comes the real work: whitewashing,
downplaying, and ignoring outright what took place, because it doesn't fit the establishment narrative. FBI Special
Agent in Charge Matt DeSarno got the ball rolling when he said, "We do believe from our engagement with this subject that he
was singularly focused on one issue, uh, and it was not specifically related to the Jewish community, uh, but we're
continuing to work to find motive and, and we will continue on that path."
The
FBI Response to the Texas Synagogue Attack Is Absolutely Sick. Yesterday, news of a hostage situation in a
Texas synagogue rocked the nation. Shortly after, due to the assailant's admission on a Facebook Live stream, we had an
identity and a motive. The man holding a rabbi and other Jews hostage was a Pakistani named Muhammad Siddiqui. He
was demanding the release of his anti-Semitic sister, Aafia Siddiqui, who is currently in prison for trying to kill US
military personnel. The Islamist community has made the terrorist a living martyr, with CAIR hosting many rallies
seeking her freedom. Thankfully, due to the actions of the local police and the SWAT team that was present, the
hostage-taker was killed and everyone is now safe. As per usual, that left the FBI to march in and take things over,
and the response they gave is one of the most disgusting things I've ever seen from a law enforcement agency.
Public
Servants or Parasites? [Scroll down] Don't forget the FBI. It's in a class all by itself. Our sworn
law enforcement agents initiated a coup attempt against a duly elected president. They set a perjury trap for his
national security advisor. They even falsified evidence to a FISA court. I've heard the arguments that the FBI
rank and file are honest and professional. We shouldn't blame the whole FBI for a "few bad apples." What complete
balderdash! If most of them were honest, where were the whistleblowers during the investigation of President Trump?
As far as being professional, how did they fail to prevent the Boston Marathon bombing — even after they'd
received a tip that the Tsarnaevs were up to something? I have the same question about the Pulse Nightclub massacre.
Was it also just a "few bad apples" that tried to frame Richard Jewell for the Atlanta Olympics bombing? The FBI even had
warnings about the 9/11 attack, yet failed to act. Of course, our highly professional FBI agents were able to determine
that a noose was really a garage-door pull. It only required 15 agents and five days to make that determination.
That is some cunning police work! It appears that the FBI is either using their badges to target political enemies, or
they're just a modern-day version of the Keystone Cops in tailored suits.
Report:
Huber and Horowitz Investigations Deep State Cons Constructed by DOJ. Paul Sperry has an interesting report
posted at RCP-Investigations outlining numerous interviews with DC politicians and would-be witnesses, if any actual DOJ
investigation of the FBI and DOJ misconduct was taking place. What Sperry discovers is the year-long narrative around
John Huber and Michael Horowitz is factually false. Just like the false framework surrounding the long-forgotten U.S.
Attorney John Lausch; the guy who was supposedly hired to facilitate DOJ record production but actually did nothing of the
sort; Sperry discovers the framework around U.S. Attorney John Huber was manufactured by career officials inside the DOJ to
tamp down problematic demands for a second special counsel.
FBI
Refuses To Comply With House Declassification Review of Witness Transcripts — Defers To Robert
Mueller. The FBI has responded to a request for declassification review of witness transcripts from the Joint
House Committee headed by Chairman Bob Goodlatte. The FBI is refusing to comply with the declassification review; and,
entirely as expected, outlines the decision-maker for releasing any testimony is ultimately Robert Mueller. [...] Despite
their claims, don't be tricked into thinking it's about timing, and/or a workload, and/or the holidays. How do we know
this? Well, remember, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) Chaired by Devin Nunes, made a
similar request for release of their transcripts on September 26th, 2018. The ODNI, DOJ, FBI and Special Counsel
have refused to comply for three months.
FBI
misses deadline to provide docs to Judiciary Committee probing whistleblower raid. The Justice Department and
FBI have missed a Wednesday deadline to provide information about the government's mysterious raid on a former FBI
contractor-turned-whistleblower's home last month. Sixteen FBI agents on Nov. 19 raided the home of Dennis Nathan
Cain, who reportedly gave the Justice Department's Inspector General (IG) documents related to the Uranium One controversy
and potential wrongdoing by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. The documents in question allegedly showed that
federal officials failed to investigate possible criminal activity related to Clinton, the Clinton Foundation and Rosatom, a
Russian nuclear company. Its subsidiary purchased Canadian mining company Uranium One in 2013.
FBI
defies subpoena for docs on its raid on Uranium One whistleblower. The Deep State now is publicly baring its
fangs at us, laughing at ineffective attempts to hold it accountable for abuse and worse. I hate to be alarmist, but we
have police agencies misbehaving and then destroying the evidence and refusing to cooperate with constitutional oversight
functions. Just in the last couple of days, we have learned that critical form 302 records were altered months after
they were first created regarding the FBI interview upon which General Michael Flynn was prosecuted. And we learned
that the Special Counsel's Office of Robert Mueller scrubbed access to the text messages of Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, the
texting blabbermouths who revealed the D.S. "insurance policy" in the event Trump won the presidency.
DOJ
Wants To Keep Justification For Raiding Reported Clinton Foundation Whistleblower Secret. The letter was sent
to the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland on Dec. 7 in response to The Daily Caller News Foundation's Nov. 30
request to unseal court documents that would show the FBI's rationale for the raid. The documents could potentially reveal
whether the bureau and the magistrate who signed the court order allowing the raid, Stephanie A. Gallagher, knew that the
subject was, according to his lawyer, a recognized whistleblower. Sixteen FBI agents raided Dennis Cain's Union Bridge,
Maryland, home on Nov. 19 for six hours, even though Cain told them that he was a recognized whistleblower and handed
classified documents over to the agents. The documents Cain possessed reportedly showed that federal officials failed
to investigate potential criminal activity regarding former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the Clinton Foundation, and
the Russian company that purchased Uranium One.
DOJ
Wants Details of Mysterious FBI Raid on Protected IG Whistleblower Kept Secret. An interesting legal development in the aftermath
of the mysterious FBI raid on protected FBI whistleblower Nate Cain. The DOJ wants the details behind the search warrant to remain under
seal, and the whistleblower target of that warrant — who was not arrested — is accusing the DOJ-FBI of being a police state.
Hillary Clinton & Google Created [a] Covert Server
to Hide Classified Benghazi Emails from Congress; FBI Never Probed. It's like a bad spy movie involving a third-world government.
Or perhaps a slap stick comedy. The Secretary of State of the United States reading, sending, receiving sensitive emails with national security
secrets, threats and classified or top secret intelligence over Google's public Gmail. We expect this from chatting soccer moms but not from
the top diplomat of the United States and her aides. But it gets even worse. The FBI either never discovered this blatant and clandestine
violation of federal laws or did and simply covered it up. Following the Benghazi consulate attack in 2012, then Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton secretly worked with Google to reroute email traffic away from her private computer server and use public Google Gmail servers instead.
22-year-old
changing in dressing room catches FBI agent taking photos, NJ cops say. A 22-year-old woman was changing in a
New Jersey clothing store's dressing room on Thursday [7/19/2018] when she made a horrifying discovery, according to
police. There was a man snapping pictures of the woman on his cell phone as the woman changed clothes at the shop in
Edison, New Jersey. And when the woman confronted the man, she found out he wasn't just anyone. The man told her
he was a law enforcement officer, according to Middlesex County prosecutors. That's when the woman called 911.
Danuel S. Brown, a 30-year-old special agent in the FBI's New York field office, was arrested on charges of fourth-degree
invasion of privacy, prosecutors said.
FBI
repeatedly overstated encryption threat figures to Congress, public. The FBI has repeatedly provided grossly
inflated statistics to Congress and the public about the extent of problems posed by encrypted cellphones, claiming
investigators were locked out of nearly 7,800 devices connected to crimes last year when the correct number was much smaller,
probably between 1,000 and 2,000, The Washington Post has learned. Over a period of seven months, FBI Director
Christopher A. Wray cited the inflated figure as the most compelling evidence for the need to address what the FBI calls
"Going Dark" — the spread of encrypted software that can block investigators' access to digital data even with a
court order.
FBI
Admits It Inflated Number of Supposedly Unhackable Devices. We've learned that the FBI has been misinforming
Congress and the public as part of its call for backdoor access to encrypted devices. For months, the Bureau has
claimed that encryption prevented it from legally searching the contents of nearly 7,800 devices in 2017, but today the
Washington Post reports that the actual number is far lower due to "programming errors" by the FBI. Frankly, we're not
surprised. FBI Director Christopher Wray and others argue that law enforcement needs some sort of backdoor "exceptional
access" in order to deal with the increased adoption of encryption, particularly on mobile devices. And the 7,775
supposedly unhackable phones encountered by the FBI in 2017 have been central to Wray's claim that their investigations are
"Going Dark." But the scope of this problem is called into doubt by services offered by third-party vendors like Cellebrite
and Grayshift, which can reportedly bypass encryption on even the newest phones.
Maybe
Mueller should be investigated. Consider the issue of criticizing Robert Mueller, the special counsel.
Any criticism or even skepticism regarding Mueller's history is seen as motivated by a desire to help Trump. Mueller
was an assistant U.S. attorney in Boston, the head of its criminal division, the head of the criminal division in Main
Justice, and the director of the FBI during the most scandalous miscarriage of justice in the modern history of the
FBI. Four innocent people were framed by the FBI to protect mass murdering gangsters who were working as FBI informers
while they were killing innocent people. An FBI agent, who is now in prison, was tipping off Whitey Bulger as to who
might testify against him so that these individuals could be killed. He also tipped off Bulger, allowing him to escape
and remain on the lam for 16 years. What responsibility, if any, did Mueller, who was in key positions of
authority and capable of preventing these horrible miscarriages, have in this sordid incident?
Comey
Joins Stormy as Latest Porn Star to Target Trump. First, he made a devastating case for prosecuting Hillary
Clinton for her reckless disregard for national secrets using her illegal bathroom email server. Yet, in the same press
conference, announced he was giving her a pass on all of her crimes. We have since learned that he and the entire cabal
of Clinton cronies at the FBI and Department of Justice rigged not only that investigation but also the separate investigation
into the Clinton Foundation. Remember, the Clinton Foundation investigation centered on compelling evidence that the
Clinton Cartel was using the foundation for a global shakedown and extortion racket. They were raking in hundreds of
millions in "speaking fees" and other donations in exchange for favors that could be performed far into the future —
assuming, of course, that Hillary Clinton was a shoo-in for the White House.
Catherine
Herridge Confirms Lisa Page Statements Contradicted Andrew McCabe, Ultimately Leading to His Firing. Fox News Catherine Herridge reports
today [4/5/2018], per her FBI investigative sources, it was an investigative interview with FBI Attorney Lisa Page, in July 2017, that contradicted
FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, and ultimately led to his firing. That revelation is exactly what we anticipated was the origin to Inspector
General Michael Horowitz gaining the text messages between Lisa Page and Peter Strzok. The issue is actually more stunning than presented.
Why the FBI Is Dodging Nunes. It was reported
recently that the FBI refuses to show Congressman Devin Nunes an unredacted copy of the origination document that triggered the probe into the
Trump campaign. What is the FBI hiding? Paradoxically, nothing — that is, no classified information showing collusion between
Trump and Russia. The FBI is simply trying to hide the embarrassingly partisan origins of its spying on the Trump campaign. Were the
redactions covering material harmful to Trump, that material would have been leaked by now. So the redactions can only be concealing the
fingerprints of Hillary's partisans in the Obama administration.
Andrew
McCabe's Wife Falsely Claims He 'Kept Himself Separate' From Her State Senate Campaign. Jill McCabe, the wife of former FBI
deputy director Andrew McCabe, falsely claimed in a Monday [4/2/2018] op-ed that her husband "kept himself separate" from her state senate
campaign. McCabe, who ran in 2015 as a Democrat for a Virginia State Senate seat, said the last year and a half have been a
"nightmare" for her and her family because of "twisted reporting and presidential tweets." She wrote in her Washington Post
op-ed that she is now, however, free to speak out because her husband is no longer at the FBI. The "accidental politician"
highlighted how she and her husband met, her career in the medical field, and various aspects of her state senate campaign in
2015, including her support from former Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D.) and her husband's role in the campaign.
Ms.
McCabe, Andrew Did Not Separate Himself From Your VA Senate Run, He Used His FBI Email To Campaign For You.
[Scroll down] Oh yeah, this guy is getting railroaded, except that he's not. And it doesn't seem that stretching
the truth falls far from the tree. His wife, Jill, a doctor, penned an op-ed in The Post about her failed 2015
Virginia Senate run and how there was no conflict of interest. There have been allegations that McCabe's donations from
pro-Clinton Gov. Terry McAuliffe's PAC during that run, which exceeded $400,000, was a sort of down payment for political
protection since soon after her campaign ended, Mr. McCabe became deputy director, where one of his tasks was to oversee
the investigation into Hillary Clinton's email fiasco.
Justice
Dept. charges Minnesota FBI agent for leaking secret document to news outlet. A former Minneapolis FBI agent
who sought to expose what he called "systemic biases" within the bureau has been charged after allegedly leaking secret
documents to a national news reporter, according to federal criminal charges filed in Minnesota this week. The charges,
filed by prosecutors for the Justice Department's National Security Division, are the first to come in Minnesota since
Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced a broad crackdown on government leaks last year. A two-page felony
information, a charging document that typically signals an imminent guilty plea, outlines two counts filed against Terry
James Albury of unlawfully disclosing and retaining national defense information.
FBI
Agent Charged For Doing Exactly What James Comey Admitted To Doing. An FBI agent was charged for doing the
exact same thing as former FBI Director James Comey, according to the Washington Times. The Justice Department has
filed charges against Terry Albury for allegedly leaking classified documents to a news media outlet.
The
FBI Gets The Attention Of The AG And Courts Over Ignoring Subpoenas. Morale Possibly Ruined. Late last
week, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte hit Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein with a subpoena for
documents related to several investigations, such as the Clinton email investigation. What brought this on was
stonewalling of the committee's document requests by the FBI.
House
subpoena rattles Justice Department; Sessions 'angry' at slow response. The FBI is promising swift action on a
House subpoena covering three politically charged investigations after word that Attorney General Jeff Sessions has grown
angry with the bureau's slow-walking of congressional requests for information. Last week the House Judiciary Committee
sent a subpoena to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein demanding documents from the Justice Department and the FBI
"regarding charging decisions in the investigation surrounding former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's private email
server, potential abuses of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, and the FBI's Office of Professional Responsibility
recommendation to fire former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe," according to a committee press release.
Did The FBI *Cause* Pulse? So once
again we have outrageous prosecutorial misconduct. Specifically, the prosecution had an obligation to disclose
this during discovery before the trial began, and did not. But the better question here is whether the FBI knew that
the shooting was going to take place, was being planned, and deliberately ignored it or worse, even egged it on.
Was the FBI's Investigation
of Hillary Clinton a 'Sham'? This should be big news. In fact, this should have led the evening news on
Sunday night, and there should be some kind of media investigation of this planned today, but there wasn't, and there won't
be. The reason this story didn't lead the news yesterday, and that the media won't be investigating it today (or ever)
is because it doesn't fit the liberal narrative. Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) appeared on the Fox News Channel Sunday
morning to continue his call for a second special counsel to investigate the FBI's behavior during the 2016 elections.
House
Judiciary Committee Subpoenas 1.2M Documents Reviewed by DOJ IG. Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), the chairman
of the House Judiciary Committee, has run out of patience with the U.S. Justice Department and is now subpoenaing 1.2 million
DOJ documents, including decisions made by former FBI Director James Comey not to prosecute former Secretary of State Clinton
and other matters leading up to and beyond the 2016 election. The DOJ inspector-general also is investigating the FBI's
handling of the Clinton case. "Well, we want to see everything that the inspector general has seen, which is, we understand,
about 1.2 million documents," Goodlatte told Fox News's Neil Cavuto on Monday. He said the documents are critical to
his committee's oversight of the FBI and DOJ.
DOJ:
Inspector General Examining Whether McCabe Was Promised Promotion to FBI Director by Hillary Clinton. Andrew McCabe may have
revealed to his inner circle an inside plan to replace his friend James Comey as FBI director if and when Hillary Clinton was elected president
of the United States, according to top officials in the Justice Department. [...] If those discussions about a promotion to FBI director with
co-workers and McCabe's inner circle were anything more than bravado, that certainly is troubling. And given the fact that McCabe's wife
Jill was given more than $1.25 million in Hillary-backed campaign donations to run for state senate in Virginia, it could spell additional
legal woes for her husband. McCabe was in charge of the Hillary Clinton email investigation at the FBI at the same time his wife ran for
office. At the same time he and his wife struck a deal to run for office with Hillary consigliere and Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe,
who was allegedly under investigation at the time by the FBI for a public corruption case.
Documents:
FBI Carefully Planned Clinton-Lynch Tarmac Trip, Tried To Cover It Up. The Federal Bureau of Investigation
(FBI) under director James Comey carefully plotted logistics and security for President Bill Clinton's meeting on an airplane
tarmac with then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch during the 2016 campaign. The FBI then attempted to cover up the tarmac
meeting by targeting a Bureau whistleblower. The FBI worked with its offices around the country to execute the plan.
FBI
staffers knew warnings about Nikolas Cruz were related but closed the case, lawmakers learn. The FBI this week
detailed to Congress a series of mistakes and missed opportunities to intervene before a gunman killed 17 people at Marjory
Stoneman Douglas High School in Florida — including a revelation that staffers knew two warnings about suspect
Nikolas Cruz were related, but still closed the case. FBI Deputy Director David Bowdich made the comments in a closed
briefing Tuesday with members of the House Judiciary and Oversight Committees. In a summary released Wednesday [3/7/2018]
to Fox News, Bowdich cited two tips that the FBI received about Cruz in September 2017 and January 2018 that were mishandled.
FBI
Paid Best Buy Technicians to Inform Them about Illegal Content on Customer Devices. The FBI recruited computer
technicians at Best Buy to inform them about illegal content on personal devices customers brought in for repairs, new Bureau
documents show. The informants were discovered after Best Buy's Geek Squad technicians at a Kentucky repair shop found
thousands of child-pornography images on California doctor Mark Rettenmaier's computer. The documents from the ensuing
court case showed that eight informants were cooperating with the FBI to turn over illegal content.
Best Buy Gave Obama
FBI [a] Tour of [a] Geek Squad Facility [and the] FBI Paid Employees As Informants. Well isn't this
interesting? The FBI was given it's [sic] own private tour of the Best Buy "Geek Squad" computer repair facilities
during the Obama and Comey days. This was done back in September of 2016, at the height of the election season.
We'll wait (and wait and wait) to see if Mr. Magoo Jeff Sessions or his boss Rod Rosenstein do anything about this.
FBI
agent Peter Strzok was told of possible breach into Clinton's server but didn't follow up, sources say. During
the final months of the Clinton email investigation, FBI agent Peter Strzok was advised of an irregularity in the metadata of
Hillary Clinton's server that suggested a possible breach, but there was no significant follow up, according to two sources
with knowledge of the matter. Sources told Fox News that Strzok, who sent anti-Trump text messages that got him removed
from the ongoing Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Russia probe, was told about the metadata anomaly in 2016, but Strzok did
not support a formal damage assessment.
Australian
diplomat whose tip prompted FBI's Russia-probe has tie to Clintons. The Australian diplomat whose tip in 2016
prompted the Russia-Trump investigation previously arranged one of the largest foreign donations to Bill and Hillary
Clinton's charitable efforts, documents show. Former Australian Foreign Minister Alexander Downer's role in securing
$25 million in aid from his country to help the Clinton Foundation fight AIDS is chronicled in decade-old government memos
archived on the Australian foreign ministry's website.
John
Solomon: FBI Never Told Congress Aussie Diplomat Whose Tip Triggered Russia Probe Is Linked To Clinton Foundation.
According to a new report, the FBI failed to brief Congressional investigators on ties between former Australian Foreign Minister
Alexander Downer, the diplomat whose tip prompted the Russia probe, with the Clinton Foundation.
Indicted Russians. That's
It? The Russians spent some money buying Americans to demonstrate? Or just found kindred spirits online
to do it free? [...] Or, Americans made "false statements" to FBI investigators when, as in the Flynn debacle, the bureau had
already said there were no lies? That's the output thus far from Team Mueller with regard to their mission to investigate
whether there was Russian meddling in our presidential election in 2016, and whether Americans "colluded" with the Russians in
such endeavors. So far, we haven't seen anyone indicted for such matters, but we do see truly shocking and genuinely
dangerous corruption among the investigators and the enforcers.
Nunes:
FBI may have violated criminal statutes in FISA application to spy on Trump adviser Carter Page. The FBI may
have violated criminal statutes, as well as its own strict internal procedures, by using unverified information during the
2016 election to obtain a surveillance warrant on onetime Trump campaign aide Carter Page, the chairman of the House Intelligence
Committee charged Thursday [3/1/2018] in a letter obtained by Fox News. House Intelligence Committee (HPSCI) Chairman Devin
Nunes, R-Calif., wrote in his letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions that "in this instance, it's clear that basic operating
guidance was violated." Nunes cited the Domestic Investigations and Operations Guide (DIOG), which was created by the bureau
and approved by the Justice Department, to say he believed the FBI violated procedures requiring verified and documented evidence
in applications to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.
FBI Denies
Secret Comey-Obama Meeting[,] Raises Integrity and Public Trust Issues. The FBI states it will not expedite the
release of documents about secret meetings between FBI Director James Comey and former President Barack Obama, according to a
letter the bureau sent to The Daily Caller News Foundation. Such information is not "a matter of widespread and
exceptional media interest in which there exists possible questions about the government's integrity which affects public
confidence," David Hardy, the section chief for the bureau's Record/Information Dissemination Section, told TheDCNF in a Feb. 26
letter. TheDCNF, under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), requested records of all meetings between Comey and
Obama and sought an "expedited process" as provided under the act when issues are of great interest to the media and the
records address issues pertaining to government integrity. TheDCNF FOIA request was filed Feb. 16, 2018.
Assault On The Constitution.
I'm a former TV news reporter in Washington, DC. I wrote and produced these reports utilizing many sources including the
Conservative Treehouse and the government documents it's published. This report focuses on the Obama administration's
Illegal spying of the Trump Campaign. It includes discussion of the FISA warrant and the House and Senate investigations
of the executive branch's misleading search warrant application to the FISA Court. Former U.S. attorney Joseph diGenova
says he expects former top FBI officials to be charged criminally. [Video clip]
The Shocking History
Of Sexual Misconduct Within James Comey's FBI. The Department of Justice's inspector general sanctioned at
least 14 FBI agents and officials for a range of improper sexual acts since 2014, and most of the misconduct occurred during
former FBI Director James Comey's term, The Daily Caller News Foundation has determined. The public got a glimpse into
the bureau's sexual mischief when it was disclosed high-profile FBI officials Lisa Page and Peter Strzok were cheating on
their spouses. Special counsel Robert Mueller dumped Page from his investigation on Russian collusion and later removed
Strzok after he learned of their relationship. But it turns out sexual misconduct within the bureau went much further
than cheating spouses.
FBI
was told by someone close to Nikolas Cruz that "he's so into ISIS". This doesn't mean that Cruz was an Islamic
jihadi. It means that he saw their bloodlust, and admired it. An organization that glories in violence and murder
is going to attract people of like mind. And if that organization justifies itself by reference to the teachings of a
major religion, this kind of thing is going to keep on happening. The FBI, of course, did nothing.
FBI
bureaucratic failures and willful blindness rack up a horrifying body count. After [a young man] gunned down 17 people
at Stoneman Douglas High School in Florida, FBI special agent Robert Lasky, head of the bureau's Miami division, said he "truly regrets"
the pain caused by the FBI's failure to act on a tip about the shooter. The FBI said it had no way to trace the tip, then FBI boss
Christopher Wray said the message was never passed on to the FBI's Miami field office, as official protocol required. Relatives of
the victims might have noted the passive verb construction. In typical style, Wray failed to name the person who never passed on
the tip, and offered no explanation why that person might have done so. [...] Who are the FBI agents, and their bosses, who looked the
other way in the Fort Hood, Boston Marathon and Orlando terrorist attacks? What, exactly, are they doing now? As in the
Florida high-school shooting, the victims and their loved ones deserve some answers.
Does
the FBI really have anyone investigating tipoffs about school shooters? As if it couldn't soil itself more in the wake of
its flawed Russian investigation scandal targeting Donald Trump, the Federal Bureau of Investigation is in hot water again, this time
over its failure to act on at least two very specific tipoffs about the Parkland, Florida school spray shooter, who murdered 17 people
in cold blood. [...] This tipoff failure follows an earlier one, from an Alabama bail bondsman, who sent email to the FBI about the gunman's
plans, posted on YouYube, of becoming "a professional school shooter," which bounced back. After that, the bail bondsman called the
FBI local field office, whose agents promised him they'd "look into it." They didn't.
Here's
a list of recent attacks the FBI missed despite 'significant warning signs beforehand'. The Washington Free
Beacon's Stephen Gutowski put Here's a list of recent attacks the FBI missed despite 'significant warning signs beforehand'
together a list of recent attacks that the FBI missed despite "significant warning signs," and it's quite disturbing.
The
FBI looks like the Federal Bureau of Incompetence after ignoring warning about Florida gunman. Wasn't there
something eerily and disgracefully familiar about the news that the FBI had a highly specific warning about the murderous
intentions of [...] the gunman who has confessed to shooting and killing 14 students and three adults at a Florida high school
Wednesday? Doesn't it remind you of the way that after nearly every single one of the Islamist terror attacks of the last
few years — whether in America, in Britain or elsewhere — a devastating phrase soon emerges? The
attacker was "known to the authorities."
Congressman
calls Trump 'psychopath' for saying out loud what rational-minded Americans are thinking about FBI. Democrats
have become so unhinged over their hatred for President Donald Trump that they think nothing of calling the commander in
chief a "psychopath." Case in point, U.S. Rep. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., who took great exception to Trump saying
out loud what most rational minded Americans are already thinking when it comes to the FBI.
Florida
shooting shows not to rely on the FBI. People are asking why didn't the FBI follow up on the tips about the
gunman who went on to kill 17 people at a high school in Florida? That's the wrong question. We should ask:
why didn't the tipsters report their suspicions to the local police or sheriff's office?
One
Organization Has Blood On Their Hands: It's the FBI. Leftists and the media can complain and whine all
they want about the NRA, Trump or Republicans in Congress. Problem is, there is really one government organization in
this country that has yet more blood dripping for their hands after the Parkland shooting. It's not the NRA, it's the
pathetic, partisan, FBI. All the warning signs were there [...]. All the social media posts with wanting to be a
"professional school shooter" and such were available for everyone to see on Youtube. Instead, the FBI couldn't be
bothered with [the shooter] because they had more important things to do.
The
FBI Admits They Screwed Up. But They're So Sorry. Well, guess what, everyone — the FBI
is finally admitting they dropped the ball on [the Florida] high school shooter [...]. This kid left a trail of
breadcrumbs a mile long, and yet law enforcement just said, "Meh." It's so egregious that Florida Gov. Rick Scott is
now calling for the FBI director to resign. On Friday [2/16/2018], the FBI said that just last month — let that
sink in — a person close to [the shooter] contacted them. The information the caller told the FBI was ominous.
[The shooter] not only owned a gun, but he expressly said that he wanted to kill people, and school shootings seemed to be a thing
with him. The caller reported this on January 5th, and yet the FBI did nothing.
FBI
Received a Credible Tip about Florida Shooter. Did Nothing. "We need to do more to prevent gun violence"
crows every rube with brains consisting of mainly sawdust. The "do more" typically takes the form of "more government
intervention." [...] We already have background checks. We already have law enforcement. We already have agencies
tasked with investigating crime and credible threats. Law enforcement and the FBI failed here. Resulting in the
gunman passing a background check. So, if law enforcement and the FBI had done that which they're tasked with doing, isn't
it possible to conclude Nikolas Cruz would've failed a background check? Thereby would not have purchased guns legally?
The
FBI Keeps Missing Mass Shooters Before It's Too Late. Revelations that the FBI had been warned about [the] Florida
high school shooter [...] fit an all-too-familiar pattern, in which apparent law enforcement errors have preceded mass murders.
A person close to [the shooter] warned the the FBI last month that he had a "desire to kill people" and could carry out a school
shooting, the FBI admitted on Friday [2/16/2018]. The agency failed to act on the tip. The FBI was also warned about
[the shooter] after he posted on YouTube saying he was going to become a "professional school shooter." The agency said they
couldn't identify the user who made the threat, despite [the shooter] posting under his own name.
Say
Something, Do Nothing — FBI Statement On Parkland Florida School Shooting. The FBI released a
stunning admission today admitting they received prior a specific warning about Broward County Nikolas Cruz and his threats
to carry out a school shooting. The FBI took no action.
What Do We Do about the Biased
and Incompetent FBI? It's bad enough for a law enforcement agency to be biased. It's even worse for it to
be biased and incompetent. But the latter seems to be an apt characterization of our Federal Bureau of
Investigation in the wake of the killings in Parkland, Florida, where, by their own admission, the organization overlooked
warnings about the killer that could have saved seventeen students and teachers from mass murder. This is no mere
bureaucratic slip-up and the demand by Governor Scott for the resignation of FBI Director Wray is understandable considering
the number of dead children in his state. The incompetence, moreover, is not just restricted to Parkland. It
pervades an institution that — frequently blinded by the most rote political correctness — interviewed
and then released terrorists who ultimately perpetrated horrific attacks from the Boston Marathon to the Orlando nightclub
massacre. (There are several more.)
Report:
FBI Warned About Potential School Shooter in September. The FBI was notified in September after a YouTube user
[...] left a comment about wanting to be a "professional school shooter," reports the far-left BuzzFeed News.
Danny Casolaro. Danny Casolaro,
an aspiring novelist, freelance writer and investigative reporter looking into the theft of Project PROMIS software, a
program capable of tracking down anyone anywhere in the world, died in August 1991, a reported suicide. Casolaro was
also investigating Pine Gap, Area 51 and governmental bioengineering.
The Strange Death
of Daniel Casolaro. In the weeks before his death Casolaro had spoken frequently about threats on his
life. In fact, just before he left for Martinsburg he told his brother, "If anything happens to me, don't believe it's
an accident." For reasons unknown, Casolaro's family wasn't notified of his death until two days after his body was
discovered. And by that time, his body had already been embalmed illegally. Additionally, the hotel almost
immediately brought in an industrial cleaning company to sanitize the room, thereby greatly diminishing any opportunity for
an independent forensic investigation.
Justice
Department changes the FBI's story on Danny Casolaro's file. The Department of Justice appears to have
retroactively declared that 98% of the FBI file on the journalist Danny Casolaro was and still is missing, despite the FBI
seeming to say they had found it. Having previously released only a handful of documents which indicated the FBI misled
Congress about investigating Casolaro's suspicious death, with other documents from the DOJ hinting at interference and a
cover-up, the DOJ has rewritten the FBI's explanation for not releasing 1,350 pages from Casolaro's FBI file. Despite
the FBI having twice written that the files were found, the DOJ now says that the files are missing and always were. As
the chain of events appear to defy explanation, they are offered as-is and without an attempt to explain.
The alleged plot to kidnap Governor Gretchen Whitmer
Recap and overview:
Here's
How The DOJ And FBI Are Spending Their Time Instead Of Rooting Out Actual Extremists. The FBI said in October
of 2020 it had foiled a violent plan to kidnap Democratic Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, spending months working with
informants and sending undercover agents to monitor meetings, chats and training exercises, eventually stopping the operation
and arresting those involved, Buzzfeed reported. The DOJ labeled the men "violent extremists" for the planned
kidnapping and plan to use explosives in the operation. "Federal and state law enforcement are committed to working
together to make sure violent extremists never succeed with their plans, particularly when they target our duly elected
leaders," U.S. Attorney Andrew Byerly Birge said. The DOJ elevated the case to include terror-related charges months
later for allegedly conspiring to use weapons of mass destruction. Defense attorneys claimed throughout the trials that
the men could never have planned the operation themselves, and the FBI had entrapped them in the undercover operation, often
offering the men money, Buzzfeed reported. The defense said the FBI "conceived and controlled every aspect" of the
kidnapping operation, according to the Washington Examiner. In a blow to the FBI's case, two men were acquitted of all
charges related to the kidnapping by the jury on Friday. The jury also was unable to reach a verdict on two more men
that had already been charged, leading to a possible re-trial.
Men
who allegedly tried to kidnap Gov. Gretchen Whitmer to stand trial again. The alleged masterminds of an
extremist plot to kidnap Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer and start a civil war ahead of the 2020 presidential election
will be re-tried after a jury failed to reach a verdict in their cases earlier this year. A federal judge set a trial
date in August for Adam Fox and Barry Croft Jr. Thursday after declining their lawyer's request to clear them of
conspiracy and weapons charges. "We don't know what the jury was thinking. ... There's enough here to say that a
rational jury could still go against Mr. Fox, go against Mr. Croft, even considering the outcome with respect for
Mr. [Daniel] Harris and Mr. [Brandon] Caserta," US District Judge Robert Jonker said, referencing two alleged co-conspirators
that were found not guilty. Fox and Croft were part of a paramilitary militia group called "Wolverine Watchmen" that
planned to abduct Whitmer at her vacation home because they were upset over the COVID-19 restrictions and mandates enacted by
the 50-year-old Democrat, prosecutors alleged.
Whitmer
Hoax Defendant: 'My Life Got Taken Away From Me'. Brandon Caserta had just ordered take-out — a
bacon double cheeseburger with jalapeno and avocado that the restaurant named the "Spicy Brando" in his honor —
when a coworker said the plant manager needed to see him. Instead of leaving to take his lunch break as planned,
Caserta, who at the time worked as a machinist in a Michigan factory that manufactures parts for Ford trucks, walked to his
boss' office to see what was up. When Caserta entered the office on October 7, 2020, at least 15 masked FBI agents and
local law enforcement officers immediately tackled him to the ground. "Stop resisting, you're under arrest!" they
shouted, according to Caserta, who spoke with American Greatness by phone for four hours this week to discuss his nearly
two-year ordeal at the hands of the U.S. government. Caserta was taken from Plymouth to Ypsilanti that evening and
interrogated. Hours later, FBI agents finally revealed why he was under arrest: for conspiring to kidnap Gretchen
Whitmer, the Democratic governor of Michigan.
Report:
FBI Corruption Targets Millions of Americans. The most recent example involved the supposed kidnapping plot
against Michigan's Gretchen Whitmer. Just prior to the 2020 election, the FBI made a big show of taking down several
"right-wing" extremists who we were assured were deadly serious about going after the Democrat governor. Of course, it
was just one big coincidence that the government made its move during a time period that exacted maximum political harm
against Donald Trump by pushing a left-wing narrative about "domestic terrorism." In early April, though, two men were
acquitted of conspiracy (with the jury hanging on the rest of the alleged suspects) after they successfully argued that they
had been entrapped. That wasn't a new theory, either. RedState and other outlets had been pointing out for years
that the entire situation stunk, and that it appeared the FBI cooked up the plan while manipulating vulnerable men to take
part in it. Last I checked, the government isn't supposed to be in the business of instigating crimes that otherwise
wouldn't have been committed, but here we are.
Inside
the FBI's infiltration and entrapment of a Michigan militia crew. The FBI got walloped last week when a
Michigan jury concluded that the bureau had entrapped two men accused of plotting to kidnap Gov. Gretchen Whitmer.
Those men and others were arrested a few weeks before the 2020 election in a high-profile, FBI-fabricated case that Joe Biden
claimed showed President Trump's "tolerance of hate, vengeance, and lawlessness to plots such as this one." But the jury
verdict exposes how the feds have created the monsters they parade to vindicate their vast power over Americans.
Michigan was a swing state in the 2020 election. When the arrests were announced, Whitmer speedily denounced Trump for
inciting "domestic terrorism." Biden won the 2020 election because of the early voting, and the Michigan kidnapping plot
was one of the biggest stories in October 2020. Prior to the presidential election, Attorney General Bill Barr assured that
news did not leak about multiple federal investigations into Hunter Biden. But the FBI felt no such constraints and
trumpeted a ludicrous scheme that was shot down even by a jury that a federal judge had largely blindfolded.
Justice
Department Plans to Re-Try Two Remaining Whitmer Fednapping Defendants. Despite a humiliating defeat in what
the Justice Department considered one of its biggest domestic terror investigations in recent history, federal prosecutors
announced they will re-try two men who were not acquitted last week on charges of conspiring to kidnap Michigan Governor
Gretchen Whitmer in 2020. [...] Defense attorneys argued the men were entrapped by the FBI, which the jury presumably
believed in the case of Harris and Caserta. Numerous FBI experts and agents took the stand for the government, as did
Dan Chappel, the lead informant and one of his FBI handlers. The three-week trial exposed a wide-ranging operation
inside the FBI and Justice Department to target the men — who did not know each other until the FBI got
involved — infiltrate the group with informants and undercover agents, create encrypted group chats monitored by
the FBI, plan and fund excursions including a surveillance trip to Whitmer's summer cottage, secretly record every
conversation including when the targets were high on marijuana, and drive several defendants to the arrest site in October
2020 under a phony pretense.
The
Entire Gretchen Whitmer "Kidnapping" Case Was Exposed As A Fraud — A Full Recap. Just weeks before
the 2020 election, the FBI announced that it had thwarted an attempt by rightwing terrorists to kidnap Gretchen Whitmer, the
governor of Michigan. At the time, Whitmer was taking intense criticism for her draconian handling of the COVID
pandemic. [...] When the arrests were made in 2020, we were told by the MSM that the plot involved a group of violent militia
members, who were upset about Whitmer's pandemic measures — which included restrictions on travel and
assembly. We were assured that the incendiary language of political conservatives inspired the kidnappers. It was
reported that the group intended to use firearms and explosives to abduct Whitmer from her lake home and sneak her out of the
state. Fortunately, the FBI thwarted the attempt. It was billed as a shining example of the world's preeminent
law enforcement agency in action. Whitmer, Pelosi, and Schumer all ran to the microphones on the eve of the election to
condemn the rhetoric of conservatives. Joe Biden phoned it in from his basement. It was a perfect media storm,
just a month before the election.
FBI
Kidnapping Caper Was Flagrant Election Interference. [Scroll down] Despite endless resources and
favorable rulings by the judge overseeing the case, the government failed to secure a single conviction in what the
Justice Department considered one of its largest domestic terror investigations ever. Daniel Harris and Brandon
Caserta, after a year and a half in prison, went home to their families on Friday night; Adam Fox, the alleged ringleader,
and Barry Croft, Jr. remain incarcerated while Birge's office prepares to retry the men — a fool's errand, as they
didn't know each other prior to the FBI's involvement in the faux plot and live almost 1,000 miles apart. (Croft resides in
Delaware.) It's a desperate attempt to save face, regardless of the lives and the principles of justice at stake. Not
only were jurors unpersuaded by Birge's prosecutors, the jury instead seemed to believe defense attorneys' arguments that
their clients were entrapped by the FBI. At least a dozen FBI undercover agents and informants, working out of numerous FBI
field offices across the eastern half of the country and at the direction of supervising agents, concocted and funded the
sting operation.
How
the FBI Got Whacked By Their Own Boomerang in the Gretchen Whitmer Kidnapping Case. This is a massive
scandal. I know I'm being generous here after the Russian collusion hoax, but whatever crumb of credibility the Federal
Bureau of Investigation and the Department of Justice has now been lost. The Gretchen Whitmer circus has finally come
down. It's been exposed. This case was weaponized by Democrats for the 2020 election to attack Donald Trump over
an alleged kidnapping plot against Whitmer over her COVID-19 protocols. Members of a militia group were supposedly
involved. What was seen as a slam-dunk case by the Feds turned out to be an embarrassing exposure of their entrapment
games that netted them zero convictions in this case. Zilch. Two men were outright found not guilty by a federal
jury. The rest were deadlocked. It's over, and if the FBI wants to rehash all their embarrassing moments in this
case — be our guest. [Tweet]
Justice
Has Been and Will Be a Long Time Coming. On Friday, April 8, the biggest domestic news came from Grand Rapids,
Michigan. On that day the world learned that a jury had voted unanimously to acquit Daniel Harris and Brandon Caserta
of conspiring to kidnap Governor Gretchen Whitmer in the fall of 2020. [...] There were some two dozen people involved in the
"Plot to Kidnap Gretchen Whitmer" saga. Fully 12 were FBI assets. They were not there to infiltrate the
loser militia members. They were there to egg them on. The FBI helped to define and finance the plot from the
beginning. They even set up a fake "militia" for the others to rally around. They also helped to equip, not to
mention bribe, the motley crew whom they assembled for the caper. The FBI did not uncover a plot. They were prime
movers in fomenting a plot. They did not so much uncover evidence against the plotters as they entrapped them.
And it's not as if this is a one off. It is part of a pattern of abuse and irresponsibility. As the Wall
Street Journal's Holmon Jenkins put it last fall, "The agency should be scrapped and something new built to replace it."
Not
one Whitman "kidnapper" is convicted. I'll confess to having been fascinated with the entire Gretchen Whitmer
kidnapping trial from the beginning. Not because I'm a fan of kidnapping, of course, but it was just such a bizarre
story right from the beginning, sounding more like the script for a Steven Soderbergh film than something that would unfold
in real life. Unfortunately for the prosecutors, however, the case presented to the jury apparently sounded more like
it really was a work of fiction than something that was based in reality. The jurists deliberated for quite a while,
but they eventually acquitted two of the four men who were charged and failed to reach a decision on the other two, leading
Judge Robert Jonker to finally declare a mistrial. The suspects were facing the potential of life in prison if they had
been convicted.
No
Convictions in Whitmer 'Kidnapping' Case, Another Black Eye For the FBI. A Grand Rapids, Mich., jury delivered
no convictions in the FBI's case against supposed "right-wing radicals" involving their plan to kidnap Michigan's Democrat
governor, Gretchen Whitmer. Investigative reporter Julie Kelly stated on the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton Show that the
FBI operation intended to paint right-wingers as dangerous prior to the 2020 elections. The "kidnap crew" contained
more FBI agents and informers than civilians partaking in the supposed scheme. It appears as though the FBI concocted
the plan and then tried to recruit people to join them. The jury returned no verdict on Adam Fox, the supposed
ring-leader, and on Barry Croft as well. Both ended in a mistrial. They may have to go back for another trial.
Jury
acquits 2 in Whitmer case, mistrial declared for 2 others. Jurors in Michigan on Friday [4/8/2022] acquitted
two men of prosecutorial claims they conspired to kidnap Gov. Gretchen Whitmer because of her heavy-handed abuse of the
constitutional rights of the state's residents during COVID. A mistrial was declared regarding two other
defendants. A jury of six men and six women found Brandon Caserta and Daniel Harris not guilty on all counts, but did
not reach verdicts for two other defendants in the trial, Barry Croft and Adams Fox. U.S. Attorney Andrew Birge said he
was disappointed, but credited the jury with listening "to a lot of evidence."
In
Michigan, a jury punished FBI entrapment in the Whitmer kidnap plot case. Events on January 6, followed by the
government's totalitarian approach to dealing with people who dared to enter the Capitol with the Capitol police's
invitation, distracted people from another case of government overreach: in Michigan, the Department of Justice accused six
men of conspiring to kidnap Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer in late 2020. Although two men pleaded out, four went to
trial. On Friday, the jury acquitted two of the defendants and deadlocked as to the other two, resulting in a
mistrial. The reason for this DOJ failure? The fact that the FBI made up 12 of the 18 people
involved in the plot and were clearly entrapping the remaining six.
Prosecutors
Fail to Secure a Single Guilty Verdict in Alleged Whitmer Kidnapping Plot. A jury acquitted two men accused by
the FBI of conspiring to kidnap Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer and could not reach verdicts on two other men involved in
the alleged plot. Daniel Harris and Brandon Caserta were found not guilty on the charge of conspiracy to commit
kidnapping. Harris was also found not guilty of other weapons charges pertaining to the case. The jury said they
could not agree on verdicts for Adam Fox and Barry Croft Jr., who were also charged with conspiracy to commit kidnapping in
the alleged plot. As a result, U.S. District Judge Robert Jonker declared a mistrial for Fox and Croft. The
defendants faced life in prison if convicted on the kidnapping charge.
Michigan
governor kidnap case: hardened terrorists or FBI dupes? [Scroll down] At the moment the FBI arrested the
men, prosecutors argued in court, they had plans to acquire a bomb to blow up a bridge near Whitmer's home to hinder
police. Jurors, they have said, would see social media posts and hear secretly recorded conversations, highly
inflammatory language and details of a plan to take down a "tyrant". When they were arrested the case seemed a slam
dunk. But as more evidence has unfolded and the trial has begun, a different narrative has emerged. Far from
being a dedicated bunch of coup-plotters, their attorneys argue, the Wolverine Watchmen are hapless victims of FBI entrapment
who had been induced by paid informants to commit crimes they would not otherwise have considered. The FBI, according
to defense filings, deployed at least 12 informants, as well as several undercover agents. "There was no plan, there
was no agreement and no kidnapping," defense attorney Joshua Blanchard said last week. It is not an entirely outlandish
claim. The defense's argument of FBI entrapment draws on a long history.
FBI
Fed Drugs to Alleged Whitmer Kidnapping Plotters Before the Tapes Rolled. In October 2020, 14 arrests were made
due to an alleged shocking plot to kidnap the sitting governor of one of the country's most populous states. As more
details were revealed, it became clear the FBI was involved in not only arresting the suspects in an alleged plan to kidnap
Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, but also in helping to plot to take form in the first place. At the opening of the
trial last week for four of the men charged, defense attorneys made a stunning claim: Not only did the FBI entrap the
accused, but an FBI informant plied the suspects with drugs.
'Stoned
Crazy Talk, Not a Plan' Say Whitmer Defendants. For months, defense attorneys representing the men accused of
conspiring to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer in 2020 have built a convincing case of FBI entrapment, filing dozens
of motions in federal court detailing how the government concocted the plot with at least a dozen FBI undercover agents and
informants. But District Court Judge Robert Jonker wanted to delay presenting that trove of evidence at trial for as
long as possible. Days before jurors took their seats in his Grand Rapids courtroom on Wednesday morning [3/9/2022],
Jonker issued an order that warned "initial opening statements and evidence during the government's case-in-chief —
on both direct and cross — must address and be relevant to issues other than entrapment." Jonker's plan,
however, didn't make it past the first morning break. After it became clear during opening statements that the defense
could not argue their case without explaining the deep involvement of the FBI's confidential human sources, Jonker reversed his
ruling, telling the jury that "it won't be possible to draw a line between the government proving their case and entrapment."
The FBI
Goes on Trial in the Whitmer Case. Jury selection begins in a Grand Rapids courtroom Tuesday morning [3/8/2022]
in the federal trial of four men accused of conspiring to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer in 2020. The
long-awaited trial centers on the question of whether a loose band of misfits angry at pandemic lockdowns hatched a sinister
plot to abduct Whitmer from her vacation cottage and possibly kill her — or if the foiled caper was yet another
successful attempt by the Federal Bureau of Investigation to interfere in a election and sabotage Donald Trump's presidential
campaign. [...] Further, Special Counsel John Durham continues his slow drip of evidence revealing how Democratic Party
operatives used the FBI to sanitize political propaganda before the 2016 election. To that end, the Whitmer trial will
expose just what the FBI is capable of and willing to do to help Democrats score political points at the most opportune moments.
Judge
rules feds did not entrap three men charged in Whitmer kidnap plot. A Jackson County judge Tuesday denied a
motion to dismiss the criminal cases against three men accused in a plot to kidnap Gretchen Whitmer because their lawyers had
argued the FBI entrapped their clients. Jackson County Circuit Court Judge Thomas Wilson said an FBI investigation,
which involved the use of an informant identified in court only as Dan, did not "escalate" the alleged plot by the
Michigan-based militia Wolverine Watchmen to kidnap Whitmer. The alleged plot, which prosecutors have said was spawned
in anger over Whitmer's COVID-19 policies and mandates at the start of the pandemic, was foiled in October of 2020.
The
Gretchen Whitmer Kidnapping Plot Looks an Awful Lot Like Entrapment. The militia members who allegedly plotted
to kidnap Michigan's Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer because of her COVID-19 lockdown policies will go to trial in just
a few weeks. Six were charged in connection with the plot, and one of them has already pleaded guilty and is expected
to testify against the rest. State authorities charged eight others with aiding a terrorist plot. But the
government's case against these 14 alleged extremists relies on work done by at least a dozen government informants and
undercover FBI agents whose extensive involvement in the plot calls into question whether it would have moved forward at all
without the government's prodding. Some of these government actors took lead roles in organizing the supposed
plot — one of the informants was even paid $54,000 by the FBI. Taken together, these and other details raise
the strong possibility that the militia members were victims of entrapment on the part of the FBI.
Will
the Arrogance of the FBI Ever End? At a recent Judiciary Committee hearing Sen. Ted Cruz put the FBI
Executive Assistant Director of the National Security Branch, Jill Sandborn, on the spot when he cross-examined her on how
many FBI informants, agents and assets participated in the January 6, 2021 riots on Capitol Hill. She refused to answer
question after question, claiming that she could not disclose "specifics of sources and methods." She even refused to answer
the question, "Did any FBI agents or confidential informants commit crimes of violence on January 6th?" Senator Cruz had
every reason to ask those questions after the news hit that about half of the participants in the alleged plot to kidnap Michigan
Governor Gretchen Whitmer were FBI informants. They reportedly pushed the kidnaping plot while the FBI provided funding
for it. The FBI agent in charge of the "investigation" was promoted to the Washington, D.C. field office, perhaps just
in time to supervise a similar operation on January 6th. Defense lawyers have asked the federal judge presiding over
the case in Michigan to order the Justice Department to provide "use immunity" to FBI agents and informants they want to
cross-examine at trial.
A
purported 'Patriot Front' video has all the hallmarks of a false flag. One of the unpleasant realities that
became patently clear during 2021 is that leftist operatives, whether inside or outside of the government, have a new tactic
to discredit conservativism: They pretend to be conservatives, either to entrap conservatives or to falsely expose them
as bad people. [...] 2021 offered some superb examples of leftists playing at being conservatives. Sometimes it's for
entrapment purposes, as happened with the so-called "plot" to kidnap Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer. In that case,
more than half the people involved in the plot and, indeed, actively planning the plot, were, in fact, affiliated with the FBI.
More
Trouble for the FBI in the Whitmer Kidnapping Case. [Scroll down] But the press does not share the same
zeal in covering another politically charged investigation: the imploding criminal case against five men accused of
plotting to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer in 2020. The kidnapping narrative shares many similarities with
their preferred telling of January 6, not the least of which is that alleged militias incited by Trump attempted to carry out
a domestic terror attack. [...] Perhaps the media considers it a mere coincidence that the head of the FBI Detroit field
office overseeing the Whitmer plot was promoted to head of the FBI Washington, D.C. field office several weeks before
January 6? Defense attorneys in the Whitmer case are making a strong case for FBI entrapment, detailing egregious
misconduct by the agency, and asking a judge to dismiss the charges. At least a dozen FBI agents and confidential human
sources orchestrated the kidnapping scheme; defense attorneys claim the feds "actively planned and coordinated its efforts to
induce the defendants to engage in incriminating behavior and statements, even going so far as designing the objective and
structural components of the [kidnapping] conspiracy."
The
FBI's Broken Relationship with Us. All large organizations suffer from the occasional presence of bad
actors. The FBI is no exception. But it managed to retain a good relationship with the public in spite of its
flaws, because it was still solving rather than creating crimes. But something fundamentally changed in the last five
years. [...] We were told that the FBI heroically thwarted a kidnapping attempt of Governor Gretchen Whitmer. Then we
learned that there wasn't one informant involved. There were twelve informants — involved in every aspect of
recruiting and planning. Next, the lead agent, Richard Trask, was fired from the FBI after being arrested for beating
his wife after a swingers' party. Prior to his arrest, Trask was the public face of the investigation — and
filed the original criminal complaint under oath. Last month, Will Cain, sitting in for Tucker Carlson, revealed that
two more agents (unnamed) have been removed from the case and will not be testifying. Was the kidnapping a thwarted
crime or a setup? It seems fair to ask, doesn't it?
The
Likely Cause of the Media Blackout on Imploding Whitmer Kidnapping Plot. Once upon a time in America, a
high-profile federal prosecution imploding amid credible accusations of FBI entrapment would earn wall-to-wall headlines in
the national news media. A wife-beating FBI agent who used at least one criminal informant and a dozen more government
assets to concoct a plot to abduct a sitting governor — intended to create damaging headlines for an incumbent
president right before Election Day — would receive nonstop coverage on cable and broadcast news outlets.
Social media would be flooded with all the juicy details. Names like "Richard Trask" and "Stephen Robeson" would be
household names. But none of that is happening with the Justice Department's rapidly crumbling case against several men
arrested for allegedly conspiring to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer from her vacation cottage in the fall of
2020. Defense attorneys have made a strong case that without the FBI's guiding hand — and deep pockets
courtesy of American taxpayers — the scheme never would have materialized past random social media chatter.
FBI
Informant in Whitmer Kidnapping Plot Was a 'Double Agent': Prosecutors. Responding to arguments from defendants
in the Gov. Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping case that they were entrapped by the FBI, the Department of Justice has said
that one of its undercover informants was, in fact, a "double agent" working with the kidnappers against the
government. The DOJ's revelation came Jan. 6 in a response to a motion from the defendants to admit as evidence 258
statements they believe will prove the FBI entrapped them. The statements that the defendants want to have admitted as
evidence include audio recordings, where an FBI informant "Steve" is allegedly heard making statements about how to plan and
execute the kidnapping of Whitmer. The defendants — Adam Fox, Barry Croft, Kaleb Franks, Daniel Harris, and
Brandon Caserta — argue that these statements will prove that it was FBI informants like Steve who actually
facilitated and encouraged the failed plot. But far from helping facilitate the plot, one of the FBI's 12 informants
actively helped the defendants to thwart government's investigation, prosecutors said in their Jan. 6 filing.
The
FBI's Criminal Lead Informant in Whitmer 'Kidnapping' Caper. In June 2020, as the country attempted to recover
from deadly and destructive riots after the death of George Floyd, a man from Wisconsin hosted a national conference of
self-styled "militia" members in a suburban Columbus, Ohio hotel. Stephen Robeson, founder of the Wisconsin chapter of
the Three Percenters, an alleged militia group on the FBI's naughty list, pestered his contacts across the country to
participate in the gathering. People who attended the conference, including two men later charged with federal crimes
related to a plot to abduct Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer from her vacation cottage in 2020, observed that the hotel was
crawling with federal agents. One of the feds at the conference was none other than Stephen Robeson himself.
Without Robeson's deep involvement as an FBI informant, the Whitmer kidnapping caper never would have made national headlines
a few weeks before Election Day; in fact, the whole pre-election drama wouldn't have materialized at all.
Gretchen
Whitmer kidnapping: Cracks forming in federal case. Problems continue to pile up for federal prosecutors
in the lead up to the March 8 trial for the five men charged with plotting to kidnap Michigan Gov. Gretchen
Whitmer. Prosecutors confirmed in mid-December they would not call on three FBI agents closely linked to the
investigation due to allegations of personal and professional misconduct. Also in December, a key undercover informant
involved in the case was charged with fraud in an unrelated case in Wisconsin. In a pair of explosive filings submitted
on Christmas Day and on Wednesday, defense attorneys presented evidence they said proves the FBI and its confidential
informants "conceived and controlled every aspect" of the plot to kidnap Whitmer. "These defendants had no desire
whatsoever to kidnap anyone," the defense attorneys said in their filing.
Is
the Whitmer 'Kidnapping' Case About to be Tossed? The U.S. Department of Justice received an unwelcome
Christmas gift from defense attorneys representing five men charged with conspiring to "kidnap" Michigan Governor Gretchen
Whitmer in 2020: a motion to dismiss the case. The Christmas Day filing is the latest blow to the government's
scandal-ridden prosecution; defense counsel is building a convincing argument that the FBI used undercover agents and
informants to entrap their clients in a wide-ranging scheme that resulted in bad press for Donald Trump as early voting was
underway in the key swing state last year. What began as random social media chatter to oppose lockdown policies
quickly morphed into a dangerous plan to abduct Whitmer as soon as the FBI took over. A Michigan judge delayed the
trial, now set for March 8, so defense attorneys could investigate the misconduct of FBI special agents handling at least a
dozen government informants involved in the caper.
Whitmer
kidnapping plot suspects seek dismissal of charges, say FBI invented conspiracy. Defense attorneys for five men
accused of plotting to kidnap Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D-Mich.) are seeking a dismissal of the indictment, citing
"egregious overreaching" by federal officials, who they say invented a conspiracy and entrapped the men. If convicted
in the alleged extremist kidnapping conspiracy, the five men — Adam Fox, 38, Barry Croft, 46, Kaleb Franks, 27,
Daniel Harris, 24, and Brandon Caserta, 33 — face up to life in prison. "When the government was faced with
evidence showing that the defendants had no interest in a kidnapping plot, it refused to accept failure and continued to push
its plan," the mens' attorneys wrote. The Detroit News reports that the 20-page motion for dismissal was filed
Christmas night. Defense attorneys claim that Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agents and federal prosecutors took
advantage of frustration with Whitmer's stringent COVID-19 restrictions and created the conspiracy.
Was
the FBI's Whitmer Chicanery a Warm-up for January 6? As questions mount about the government's animating role
in the Capitol protest on January 6, the criminal case against the men charged with conspiring to "kidnap" Michigan Governor
Gretchen Whitmer in 2020 continues to collapse. Defense attorneys in the Whitmer case are carefully compiling evidence
that depicts an elaborate tale of FBI entrapment; at least a dozen FBI informants were involved in the failed
plot — equaling one FBI asset per defendant. FBI agents handling the informants directed every
move. They funded training and reconnaissance trips, and even organized a "national militia" conference in Ohio in June
2020 to lure potential accomplices. Several men were arrested in October 2020 when the lead informant drove them to
meet an undercover FBI agent to purchase munitions, the six month-long scheme's dramatic conclusion. News of the
shocking plot made national headlines as early voting was underway in Michigan: Joe Biden, Whitmer, and the media
blamed Donald Trump for inciting an attempted domestic terror attack. (Sound familiar?)
Was
January 6 Part of the FBI's 'Operation Cold Snap'? [I]n June 2020, days after the nation was roiled by Black
Lives Matter looting and rioting, a man from Wisconsin named Stephen Robeson sponsored a "National Militia Conference" at a
Dublin hotel. (Yes, that was the real name of the event.) According to BuzzFeed's exceptional July 2021 investigative
report on the FBI-led plot to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer in 2020, Robeson "helped organize the national meeting,
and he was enthusiastically pushing people he knew to attend." The purpose of the conference was to recruit people who
ultimately would stoke "political violence" against governors who refused to reopen their states after lockdowns supposedly
necessitated by COVID. Some participants said Robeson, known as "Robey," relentlessly pestered them until they agreed to
show up; people came from as far as Maryland and Kansas City, BuzzFeed's Ken Bensinger and Jessica Garrison reported.
One member of the Three Percenters, an alleged militia group on the FBI's naughty list, observed people taking photos from discreet
locations in the hotel. "The feds are everywhere," he thought to himself. Indeed. One of the feds was Robeson himself.
FBI
agent, 39, investigating Gretchen Whitmer kidnap plot is fired two months after he was arrested. An FBI agent
who has played a key role in the prosecution of more than a dozen 'militia' members who plotted to kidnap Michigan Governor
Gretchen Whitmer has been fired from the agency, two months after he was arrested for allegedly beating his wife.
Richard Trask, 39, was involved in the prosecution of a group of far-right 'militia' members, claiming in court documents
that they plotted to kidnap the Michigan governor and dump her in a lake over her strict COVID mandates. But in July,
Trask's reputation started to take a nosedive when he was arrested for assault with intent to do great bodily harm after he
allegedly beat his wife in their home following a disagreement at a swingers party.
Key
FBI agent in Whitmer kidnapping plot posted anti-Trump rants online during investigation. Federal prosecutors
dropped the testimony of an FBI special agent involved in the investigation of an alleged plot to kidnap Democratic Michigan
Gov. Gretchen Whitmer after findings he called former President Donald Trump [bad] on social media during the
investigation's course, according to a defense attorney. Michael Hills — who represents defendant Brandon
Caserta, who is among the six people charged in the case — said during a court hearing Thursday [9/2/2021] that
prosecutors decided not to use Agent Richard Trask's testimony during a pending October trial. Prosecutors gave defense
teams access to Trask's social media posts this week, with at least one taking aim at Trump and his supporters, Hills said,
according to the Detroit News.
FBI Agent: "Mission
is to kill the governor". As we previously discussed, the FBI — by way of its informants —
has been credibly accused of conceiving the idea to attack/kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer. New text messages
(that were recently filed with the court along with a supplement to defendants' motion to compel — all available
[elsew]here) show conversations between an FBI Agent and his confidential informant proving that the FBI Agent sought to
instigate a plot to kill Governor Whitmer. Here it is. FBI Special Agent Jayson Chambers directs FBI informant
"Big Dan" to develop a plot: [...]
More
Similarities Between the Whitmer Plot and January 6. The first defendant to plead guilty in the alleged scheme
to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer will spend the next several years in jail. A judge last week sentenced Ty
Garbin, 25, to 75 months in prison on one count of "conspiracy to kidnap." His five co-defendants have pleaded not
guilty; their trial is set to begin October 12. The case made major headlines right before Election Day 2020 as
early voting was underway in the crucial swing state. It was useful fodder for Democrats and Joe Biden. [...] But as
defendants prepare for trial, the media-crafted façade surrounding the Whitmer plot, just like the immediate designation
of January 6 as an "armed insurrection," is falling apart. Court documents suggest at least 12 FBI agents and
informants helped develop the scheme in the spring of 2020; Garbin and his co-defendants were arrested on October 7
after attempting to buy explosives from an undercover FBI agent. One informant, who went by the code name "Thor," was
paid $24,000 and given a new car by the FBI for his services. A bombshell report by Darren Beattie at Revolver
News explained the FBI's extensive role in orchestrating the most damning aspects of the kidnapping caper.
Unindicted
Co-Conspirators in 1/6 Cases Raise Disturbing Questions of Federal Foreknowledge. [Scroll down] No wonder
this Michigan plot didn't take the federal authorities by surprise! FBI infiltrators comprised, at the very least,
26 percent of the plotters. That is, at least five FBI operatives have been disclosed, against just 14 suspects
indicted. A look at the annotated indictment reveals that at every level of the plot, FBI operatives played the most
important leadership roles: The plot's "explosives expert," who the plotters were accused of planning to buy bombs
from, turned out to be an FBI agent. The head of transportation for the militia outfit turned out to be an undercover
FBI agent. The head of security for the militia outfit turned out to be an undercover FBI informant. At least two
undercover FBI informants were active participants in the initial June 6, 2020 meeting in which the plot to storm
Capitol buildings was allegedly hatched — meaning at least three FBI informants infiltrated before the conspiracy
even started. In one of the plot's climactic scenes, in the main van driving up to look at Governor Whitmer's vacation
home, three out of the five people in the van — 60 percent of the plot's senior leaders — were
federal agents and informants.
'Dark
shadow' cast on probe of Whitmer kidnap plot after FBI told informant to lie, delete texts, attorney says. The
attorney for one of six men indicted in a plot to kidnap Gov. Gretchen Whitmer said Friday, Aug. 13 that an FBI special
agent told an informant to lie and to delete text messages between them. Attorney Michael Hills, representing Brandon
Caserta, asked a federal judge to order the government provide all communications between a paid informant, identified only
as "Dan," and the FBI. The government has said it provided a significant amount of documentation and that the defense
hasn't shown evidence of entrapment that would warrant release of additional materials. Defense attorneys want to
review communication between informants as well as their conversations with the FBI. Hills sought cellphone data of
Dan, along with FBI special agents, Henrik Impola and Jayson Chambers. "These text messages indicate the F.B.I. was
pushing their paid agent to actively recruit people into an overt act in furtherance of a conspiracy," Hills wrote.
Whitmer
kidnapping case rocked by allegations FBI told informant to lie, delete text messages. When the Michigan
government announced the foiling of a plot to kidnap Gov. Gretchen Whitmer in October of 2020, many applauded the law
enforcement agency working the case. Attorneys for the alleged members of the kidnapping plot, however, are claiming
Federal Bureau of Investigation deceit and entrapment of innocent people. Mlive reported Michael Hills, an attorney for
Brandon Caserta, one of six men indicted, claimed an FBI special agent told a paid confidential informant identified as "Dan"
to lie, delete messages between them, and implicate an innocent third party. Hills requested government provide all
communications between "Dan" and the FBI.
Bizarre
arrest of FBI agent spotlights accusations of bureau corruption. Angry, and armed, the militiamen in Michigan
were gearing up, getting ready to unleash their fury over an unjust government and zeroing in on a target who they believed
upended their lives with pandemic restrictions: Gov. Gretchen Whitmer. They trained with live assault
weapons; skulked around Whitmer's summer mansion in the dark as they allegedly plotted a wild scheme to kidnap her, even
relying on an Iraq war veteran among them for his tactical experience. The June 2020 plot by the Wolverine
Watchmen — which authorities claim included the possible use of a stun gun on Whitmer and talk of blowing up a
bridge to prevent cops from giving chase — never came to pass, broken up by the Federal Bureau of Investigation in
a celebrated bust in which 14 people have been arrested so far.
Tucker
Carlson breaks down how the FBI is planning crimes to then prosecute. A report first published by
BuzzFeed alleges that the FBI was involved in Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer's kidnapping plot. Tucker
Carlson brought up the report during his show, and invited Julie Kelly from American Greatness to discuss the findings.
[Video clip]
The
Whitmer Kidnapping Case Reveals The FBI's New Counterterrorism Target Is You. Terrorism, as it turns out, is
hard. Recruiting isn't easy, and finding the right people is difficult. A person who is willing to train, travel,
keep secrets, and face a very high chance of dying is not statically all that common. Getting access to
explosives, and knowing how to use them, is technically complicated. You can practice, but if you make a mistake,
you'll blow yourself up. Oh, there's bomb-making manuals on the internet? Sure, there are. Feel free to try
those out. I dare you. Shooting isn't all that easy either, and training someone to gun fight —
really, seriously gun fight — takes expertise, and time, and a place where you can shoot for hundreds of hours
without anyone noticing. Do you know where you could do something like that? Who would teach you how to shoot
like that, or fight with knives, or drive a car so you could get away? How would you find that person? How would
you vet him to make sure he's not FBI? You wouldn't. Unless you're a mercenary, you've trained with a militia in
Africa or Asia, or you're a SWAT officer or an elite soldier, you wouldn't know those things, and you wouldn't know people
who know those things.
FBI
Attempts to Do Damage Control After Initiating Whitmer Kidnapping Plot. The FBI is attempting to do damage
control after it was revealed the law enforcement bureau initiated and carried out a significant portion of the kidnapping
plot against Democrat Governor Gretchen Whitmer last year. "Partnerships are key to disrupting violent plots.
With the terror threat growing more insular, awareness and reporting are crucial," the FBI posted on a their website this
week. "This is especially true for domestic terrorism — defined as violent, criminal acts committed by
individuals or groups to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political,
religious, social, racial, or environmental nature. Because the FBI's mission includes protecting the free speech
rights of Americans, we need a clear reason to act or investigate. A person's beliefs can never be the sole reason to
open an investigation."
The
FBI's Involvement in the Gretchen Whitmer Kidnapping Plot Goes Even Deeper. As RedState reported over the last
few days, multiple revelations regarding the FBI's involvement in the plot to kidnap Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer have
put the bureau on the defensive. After originally learning that the FBI played a pivotal role in birthing and planning
the plot, it was also revealed that an undercover FBI agent who served as the chief source of information was being
prosecuted for beating his wife. Now, more details show just how integral the FBI was in what ultimately transpired.
[...] I get that there will be times when criminals are put in a position to show their guilt, but if the bureau is having
to birth plots and set up meetings in order to even get things off the ground that most likely would have never happened
otherwise, that shows a level of involvement that assumes way too much. In short, it's ripe for abuse, and the fact
that one of the lead agents on this case turned out to be a non-credible wife-beater isn't doing much to change my opinion on
that. Does anyone really believe that guy followed protocol?
Did
the FBI drive the Whitmer kidnapping plot? Last October, we learned of the FBI's success in breaking up a plot
hatched by right-wing militia members which would have involved kidnapping Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer, blowing up a
bridge and all manner of other dangerous schemes. It was a rather terrifying story, but at least the would-be
perpetrators were stopped and brought to justice, so all's well that ends well, right? Maybe, but now it's sounds as if
there might have been more to the story than we were told at first. Or perhaps more correctly, there may have been
less to the story. Buzzfeed has published a deep dive into the FBI's account of the plot and how it was broken
up, but the account of the men accused of planning it is considerably different.
FBI
agent at center of Whitmer kidnap probe assaulted wife after swingers' party, authorities say. An FBI agent at
the center of the investigation into the plot to kidnap and kill Gov. Gretchen Whitmer is accused of smashing his wife's
head against a nightstand and choking her after a dispute stemming from their attendance at a swingers' party, according to
court records. Special Agent Richard Trask, 39, of Kalamazoo, was charged Monday with assault with intent to do great
bodily harm, less than murder following the alleged incident Sunday. An affidavit filed by the Kalamazoo County
Sheriff's Office in Kalamazoo County District Court said Trask's wife had bloody lacerations to the right side of her head
and "blood all over chest, clothing arms and hand," as well as "severe" bruising to her neck and throat.
Were
Gov. Gretchen Whitmer's would-be 'kidnappers' victims of FBI entrapment? The FBI has been accused of
encouraging and assisting a Michigan militia with their alleged plot to kidnap Governor Gretchen Whitmer, with court
documents showing the remarkable depth of involvement of multiple informants. Fourteen people have been charged so far
after an October 2020 sting operation on the 'Wolverine Watchmen' militia. Many of those were arrested at a warehouse
in Michigan where they had met to hand over cash for the purchase of explosives, which they allegedly planned to use in the
kidnapping plot. In December one key player in the case, Ty Garbin, entered a guilty plea to kidnap conspiracy charges
and faces up to life in prison. A trial date for the rest has been set for October 12. But their lawyers are
arguing that the FBI informants — at least 12 of them, according to a BuzzFeed investigation — went
way beyond simply listening and infiltrating, and instead actively recruited others to the plot, funded and directed it.
They have claimed that without the FBI informants' involvement, there would have been no plot at all.
Pausing
a minute to consider the damage leftism does to America. Last year, we learned that some people wanted to
kidnap Governor Gretchen Whitmer. It appears, though, that the FBI operatives involved in the plot originated it and
planned it. It also appears that the FBI was trying to sabotage the lawyers for the defense. This is no small
thing. As my Criminal Law professor told us a long time ago, when facing the government, which is judge, jury, and
executioner, every person, no matter how obvious his guilt, should have someone on his side. In Michigan, though,
having created a crime and then tagged people for it, the FBI is trying to deny them representation. It also turns out
that the lead agent involved in this whole thing has just been arrested for spousal abuse. If you follow the link,
you'll see that the lead agent is an odd bird under any circumstances.
It
Sure Looks Like the FBI Basically Orchestrated the Gretchen Whitmer 'Kidnapping' Plot. You may recall the
much-ballyhooed plot to supposedly kidnap Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer last year. Arrests were made in October
of 2020, with the claim being that the FBI had stopped the kidnapping plot as well as a plan to overthrow the government.
After it came out in the weeks following the bust that one of the participants was anti-Trump and a Black Lives Matter supporter,
the story quickly died down. All of this was intertwined at the time with the politics of Whitmer's controversial COVID
policies. Earlier in the same year, there had been demonstrations at the state's capital that drew lots of press attention
and condemnation. The insinuation pushed by the media was that those demonstrations had provoked the kidnapping plot.
But now, a big curveball is being thrown into the mix regarding what actually happened. Apparently, the FBI didn't just have
informants within the group where the arrests were made. Rather, FBI operatives played a key role in the planning of the
entire ordeal and were also seemingly instrumental in birthing the plot.
FBI
Special Agent In Charge of Whitmer Kidnap Plot is Arrested For Domestic Violence, Assault With Intent to Do Great Bodily
Harm. The curiously sketchy case against six accused people in the FBI organized plot to kidnap Michigan
Governor Gretchen Whitmer took another hit to the case credibility on Monday, as the lead FBI Special Agent was arrested on
domestic violence charges. This latest issue comes less than a week after court filings showed twelve embedded FBI
operatives were involved in the suspicious plot that culminated in the arrest of six individuals.
Twelve
FBI Operatives Involved in Gretchen Whitmer Kidnapping Plot That Ended With Six Arrests. From the outset in
October 2020 everything around the "plot to kidnap" Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer seemed sketchy, almost
silly. The goofy similarities and suspicions were familiar to those who remembered the sketchy October 2018 "mail
bombing plot" that involved Cesar Sayoc. It just didn't seem coincidental that both 2018 and 2020 FBI exploits involved
weird frameworks, odd suspects and obviously both operations just happened to culminate in October of an election year...
Surprise! Add to that suspicion all that was known about the FBI's intense political motivations found in their
activities over the past several years; including the sketchy attempt to frame candidate Donald Trump for a vast Russian
election conspiracy, coordinated with the opposing candidate, Hillary Clinton; and well, suspicious cats were increasingly
suspicious of the FBI engineered mess.
News items that have not yet been categorized
The
FBI Is Not What It Used to Be. Many retired agents admit to being embarrassed and ashamed of what the bureau
has become. When it comes to preventing crime, the FBI has dropped the ball far too many times. The FBI had
credible warnings about the attack on 9/11, the Pulse Nightclub slaughter, the San Bernadino shooting, the Parkland school
shooting, and even the Boston Marathon bombing. Yet somehow failed to take preventive action. They're no longer
our guardians against public corruption either. They gave Hillary Clinton a pass for her email transgressions.
They did an investigation in name only, that lasted months. Oddly, the FBI never served any subpoenas. The bureau
even destroyed the evidence at the conclusion of the investigation. It's almost as if they didn't really want to find
anything — no? Hillary Clinton, in collusion with the DNC, orchestrated the dirtiest trick in U.S. political
history — the fabricated Trump/Russian collusion tale. The FBI learned within two months that the whole
thing was a setup. Yet they played along with the plan for three years — even to the point of affecting the
2018 midterm election. Their investigation became the famous "insurance policy" against the Trump Presidency.
Rather than ferreting out corruption, the FBI became enthusiastic participants.
How
Many Times Are We Going to Let the FBI and DOJ Break the Law? [Scroll down] Look at what the FBI did to
Richard Jewell, in the wake of the Centennial Park Bombing, despite having zero evidence of any wrongdoing. In fact,
the entirety of what linked Jewell to the bombing was geographic proximity and a single FBI profiler's opinion. That's
it. We found out from the 9/11 Commission Report that the FBI was responsible for some of the breakdown in
communication that could have potentially helped to stop several of the hijackers leading up to the attacks. Remember,
Zacarias Moussaoui, sometimes referred to as the 20th hijacker, was picked up by the FBI in August 2001, but was not linked
to the other hijackers until after the 9/11 attacks. Yet it doesn't stop there. The FBI had contacted and/or
investigated the Tsarnaev Brothers — perpetrators of the Boston Bombing in 2013, Syed Farook and Tashfeen
Malik — perpetrators of the San Bernardino Shooting in 2015, and Omar Mateen — perpetrator of the Pulse
Nightclub shooting in 2016, all before any of those crimes were committed. Even after crimes are committed, the FBI
(and by extension, the DOJ) seem completely incapable of securing evidence of a motive or how the perpetrators had committed
the crimes. In the case of Stephen Paddock, the entirety of our domestic federal law enforcement power couldn't figure
out how a guy, or better yet, why a guy got an armory into a tower room at the Mandalay Bay and murdered and injured hundreds.
The
Continued American Awakening of The FBI as an Official Enforcement Mechanism of The Fourth Branch of
Government. The FBI was fully aware of the Boston Marathon bombers, the Tsarnaev brothers, before they executed
their plot. The FBI took no action. The FBI knew about the San Bernardino terrorists, specifically Tasfeen Malik,
and were monitoring her phone calls and communications before her and Syed Farook executed their attack killing 14 people and
leaving 22 others seriously injured. The FBI took no action. The FBI knew Colorado grocery store shooter Ahmad
Alissa before he executed his attack. The FBI took no action. The FBI knew in advance of the Pulse Nightclub
shooter (Omar Mateen) and were tipped off by the local sheriff. The FBI knew in advance of the San Bernardino
Terrorists (Tashfeen Malik). The FBI knew in advance of the Boston Marathon Bombers (the Tsarnaev brothers) tipped off by
Russians. The FBI knew in advance of the Parkland High School shooter (Nikolas Cruz). The FBI knew in advance of the
Fort Hood shooter (Nidal Hasan), and the FBI knew in advance of Colorado grocery store shooter Ahmad al-Aliwi Alissa.
The FBI took no action. Consider the case of the first recorded ISIS attack on U.S. soil in Garland, Texas in 2015.
The FBI not only knew the shooters (Elton Simpson and Nadir Soofi) in advance, the FBI took the shooters to the venue and
were standing only a few yards away when Simpson and Soofi opened fire. Yes, you read that correctly — the
FBI took the terrorists to the event and then watched it unfold.
Let's
Take the FBI at Their Word. [Scroll down] Larry Nassar raped hundreds of teenage girls, the FBI took no
action; however, they did apologize. The FBI was fully aware of the Boston Marathon bombers, the Tsarnaev brothers,
before they executed their plot. The FBI took no action. The FBI knew about the San Bernardino terrorists,
specifically Tasfeen Malik, and were monitoring her phone calls and communications before her and Syed Farook executed their
attack killing 14 people and 22 others were seriously injured. The FBI took no action. The FBI knew Colorado
grocery store shooter Ahmad Alissa before he executed his attack. The FBI took no action. The FBI knew in advance
of the Pulse Nightclub shooter (Omar Mateen) and were tipped off by the local sheriff. The FBI knew in advance of the
San Bernardino Terrorists (Tashfeen Malik). The FBI knew in advance of the Boston Marathon Bombers (the Tsarnaev brothers)
tipped off by Russians. The FBI knew in advance of the Parkland High School shooter (Nikolas Cruz). The FBI knew in
advance of the Fort Hood shooter (Nidal Hasan), and the FBI knew in advance of Colorado grocery store shooter Ahmad al-Aliwi
Alissa. The FBI took no action. Consider the case of the first recorded ISIS attack on U.S. soil in Garland,
Texas in 2015. The FBI not only knew the shooters (Elton Simpson and Nadir Soofi) in advance, the FBI took the shooters to
the venue and were standing only a few yards away when Simpson and Soofi opened fire. Yes, you read that correctly —
the FBI took the terrorists to the event and then watched it unfold. [...] Or more recently, the goofball plot to kidnap Gretchen
Whitmer that involved 18 suspects, twelve of them actually working for the FBI as the plot was hatched? And we cannot
forget the January 6th DC protest turned insurrection effort, which is clearly looking like an FBI inspired and coordinated effort.
Have we forgotten the Atlanta "Olympic Park Bombing", and the FBI intentionally setting up transparently innocent, Richard
Jewel? [...] And of course, the FBI still had 13 extra agents available to rush to a NASCAR racetrack to investigate a garage door
pull-down rope that might have been perceived as a noose; but the serial rape of hundreds of teenage girls, eh, not-so-much
effort — even when they are standing in front of the FBI begging for help. [...] Let me be very clear with another
brutally obvious example. Antifa could not exist as an organization, capable to organize and carry out violent attacks
against their targets, without the full support of the FBI. [...] The FBI is not a law enforcement or investigative division
of the U.S. Department of Justice. The FBI is a political weapon of a larger institution that is now focused almost
entirely toward supporting a radical communist agenda to destroy civil society in the United States.
How
FBI Spy Stefan Halper Helped Put Two Bushes in the White House. Mark Hemingway wrote a fascinating
exposé chronicling the enigmatic life of Stefan Halper, the Cambridge University professor and FBI informant who
attempted to entrap low-level Trump campaign associates with promises that "his friendship with Russian spies" could aid
Trump's efforts to win the presidency. Hemingway notes that although most Americans were unfamiliar with Halper until
details of the FBI's Crossfire Hurricane counterintelligence operation against the Republican presidential nominee came to
light, he has been a stubbornly recurring fixture near the intersection of American politics and espionage for fifty years.
Durham-Sussmann
notes battle pulls back curtain on Trump-era FBI. Andrew McCabe, the former deputy director of the FBI, said
Michael Sussmann met with the bureau in September 2016 on behalf of a client, according to notes from March 2017 made public
by the Democratic cybersecurity lawyer. The briefing notes contradict contemporaneous FBI notes and the defendant's own
text message, though the defense team thinks they could prove decisive in special counsel John Durham's case against
Sussmann. Sussmann was indicted for allegedly concealing his clients, Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign and "Tech
Executive-1" Rodney Joffe, from FBI general counsel James Baker in late summer 2016 when he presented internet data that
suggested a now-discredited back channel between the Trump Organization and Russia's Alfa-Bank.
"There's
a Number of VERY Troubling Things Happening at the FBI": Whistleblower Leaks Documents to Project Veritas. On
Wednesday, Project Veritas released documents provided by an FBI whistleblower showing that the agency is targeting news
media organizations in the US with secret criminal investigations. The unnamed whistleblower, who has been a special
agent for many years and is still employed with the bureau, provided the classified documents to Project Veritas in hopes of
exposing the corruption and politically-motivated targeting that has taken over the FBI.
Report:
FBI Corruption Targets Millions of Americans. The FBI's corruption, even just over the last five years, has
reached levels few imagined. Sure, there's always been a certain amount of distrust of government agencies, and the FBI
itself has a long history of malicious activity going back to its inception. Yet, things truly went to the next level
in the year prior to Donald Trump taking office, and they've only accelerated since then.
Did
a Key FBI Agent in Whitmer Plot Attempt to Surveil Steven Crowder? In 2017, Steven Crowder, a conservative
activist and host of a popular YouTube channel, infiltrated Antifa with his producer. Weeks before a speaking
engagement by Ben Shapiro at the University of Utah — an event Antifa planned to disrupt violently —
Crowder worked his way into the group through the use of burner phones and encrypted chats. Crowder secretly recorded
discussions between Antifa thugs promising to use "plain clothes and hard tactics" to shut down Shapiro's speech on September 28,
2017. This included distributing weapons such as ice picks, combat knives, and guns. Despite a heavy law enforcement
presence for Shapiro's speech, pockets of violence did erupt as Antifa confronted police and Shapiro supporters outside the venue,
resulting in the arrest of a handful of rabble-rousers. Crowder then posted a video account of his undercover operation and
noted a collective lack of interest by major news organizations in Antifa's violent pre-planning efforts.
DOJ
Arrests 3 Individuals on Terrorism Charges Likely Linked to Patriot Front Group — But Others Were Let
Go? After TGP reporting on another likely government-sponsored group — the Patriot
Front — the DOJ stepped into action and arrested three young men for terrorist activities. These three were
joined by others who were not arrested or indicted. Four days ago we reported on three individuals arrested by the FBI
who pleaded guilty to a plot to attack power grids in the US. The FBI shared their arrests in a press release. In the
court filing it is reported that there were a few others who participated in this plan to reportedly take down the US power grid[.]
If
they spied on Trump, they will spy on you. If the revelation earlier this month that Big Tech executives
continued to spy on Donald Trump after the 2016 election and into his presidency was an isolated incident, it would not be a
grave concern. But once you step back and see the pattern of behavior by those in power to spy on and systematically
undermine a democratically elected president, every citizen should be concerned. When the FBI first opened its
investigation into allegations that candidate Trump was coordinating with Russia, the FBI inspector general reported that the
leadership of the FBI "hand-picked" the team that would conduct "one of the most sensitive FBI investigations" in the
agency's history. These were supposed to be agents of the highest character and professionalism.
The
January 6 Pipe Bombs Look Like Another FBI Hoax. In the 15-minute time span before the joint session of
Congress convened at 1:00 p.m. on January 6, 2021, two incidents that set the stage for the day's ensuing chaos happened
simultaneously. First, a man named Ryan Samsel, after taking some sort of direction from Ray Epps, overran a thin line
of police and metal racks in what would be the first official breach of Capitol grounds around 12:50 p.m. (Samsel was charged
and has been incarcerated for more than a year; Epps faces no charges.) Joining Samsel were members of the Proud Boys and a
still-unknown number of FBI informants. Around the same time, a woman named Karlin Younger who just happened to
be walking to a laundry facility near the Republican National Committee headquarters just happened to look down and
see what she believed was a pipe bomb nestled between a dumpster and a fence right next to the building.
Department
of Homeland Security Warns That Domestic Terrorists With Hammers and Power Saws Are Plotting to Destroy the Power
Grid. [The] Department of Homeland Security is a joke. It exists solely as a jobs program for paranoids
specializing in manufacturing [specious] threats while ignoring real ones. [...] According to the FBI toad, domestic violent
extremists have two things in common. They are driven by racial hate... and they are Donald Trump supporters.
These alerts exist for one purpose. They create a patina of proof for the fear-and-smear campaign the Biden junta is
carrying out on its domestic opponents. Relentlessly tying real people and real patriots who are concerned about the
erosion of civil liberties under the illegal and unnecessary Wuhan virus regulations to potential terrorist acts is not only
dishonest, it sets a predicate for treating them like terrorists and incarcerating them for long periods of time without any
real intention of trying them for a crime... sort of like the January 6 political prisoners.
Punishing
a Dem who criticizes border chaos? [Scroll down] What makes this particularly fishy is that it took place
weeks before the primary election, a period when the FBI normally limits overt investigative activity. What makes it
even more fishy — besides the fact that there doesn't appear any conduct by Cuellar warranting personal
involvement in wrong doing — is that he has been critical of President Biden and he's running against a woman whom
he narrowly beat the last time and who is far more to the left than he is — Jessica Cisneros. If my
suspicions are warranted, the FBI and Department of Justice are firing a warning shot at any Democrat in Congress who steps
out of line.
Is
This 'Leaked' Video Real Or Staged? The Khaki-clad Patriot Front group was out protesting again
today — This time at the March for Life in Washington DC. Two weeks ago this mysterious khaki-clad group
showed up at the Chicago March for Life for some reason. [...] In spite of all that there seems to be little media interest
in digging deep to find out what's really going on with this group and who its members are. There is, however, plenty
of interest in videos that purport to show Patriot Front members using Nazi language and gestures. One that is said to
have been leaked is making the rounds. Does this seem staged, or authentic? [Video clip]
The Editor says...
Ask yourself: Who would benefit if it's genuine? Nobody. Who would benefit if it's fake but believable? The Democrats.
A
purported 'Patriot Front' video has all the hallmarks of a false flag. One of the unpleasant realities that
became patently clear during 2021 is that leftist operatives, whether inside or outside of the government, have a new tactic
to discredit conservativism: They pretend to be conservatives, either to entrap conservatives or to falsely expose them
as bad people. The latest example of this kind of fakery is a video that was recently "leaked," and that purports to
show members of the "Patriot Front," an allegedly conservative organization, revealing their true Nazi colors. There's
nothing conservative about the video but there is a distinct whiff of FBI hanging about it. [...] In additional tweets,
Mikael Thalen insists that the video is real because it's part of an entire leaked server. I hate to break this to him,
but that doesn't prove anything at all. If you're going to set up a false front operation, you wouldn't stop with
a single video. As it was, people watching the video couldn't help but notice that it had all the reality of those
"protesters" at the "Justice for J6" rally, an event crawling with FBI agents.
My Time in the Tank.
With Paul Manafort's explosive new book, Political Prisoner, we finally have a full and honest detailed account of how the
U.S. government, the not-so-special Special Counsel Robert Mueller, and particularly the FBI treated anyone and everyone
connected to Donald Trump. The plain truth is they were after him — and would stop at nothing in their quest
of subversion. I would know, because I, too, was in their sights. Detained at Boston's Logan Airport, the FBI
grilled me about the 2016 campaign, specific persons involved, Wikileaks, Roger Stone, Nigel Farage, and Russia. It was
evident that while they had a very thick file on me, and two warrants to confiscate my iPhone and laptop — which
meant they had been surveilling me for some time — they knew I knew nothing of real value. This was an act
of intimidation of a patriotic U.S. citizen, one with a former Top Secret and Codeword security clearance, who had held
senior positions in the government and served informally and without payment on the Trump presidential election campaign.
The FBI Is a Scumbag Terrorist-Protection Organization
and Must be Defunded To Save America. And you know what the GOP will do about this if they win back the House
and Senate? Nothing.
Second
Democrat, Rep. Jamaal Bowman, Arrested within a Day for Speaking Out Against Joe Biden's Failures. Two
Democrats have been arrested within a day of speaking out against wannabe Dictator Joe Biden. This time black NY
Democrat Rep. Jamaal Bowman. Bownman was one of the dozen or so leftists Democrats who are staging a hunger strike
outfront of the White House against Joe Biden after Biden once again failed to get a bill Democrats need to pass to steal
elections indefinitely. [Video clip]
FBI
raid jeopardizes Democratic Rep. Henry Cuellar's reelection bid. House Republicans are spying a surprise
opportunity to flip another Democratic-held district after the Laredo, Texas, home and campaign office of Texas
Rep. Henry Cuellar were raided by the Federal Bureau of Investigation Wednesday. Cuellar, 66, a centrist and
frequent target of Republicans and the Left, has been impossible to dislodge since winning a seat in Congress in 2004. But
Cuellar could be unexpectedly vulnerable beginning March 1, when he stands for renomination against a liberal challenger in
the Democratic primary — or this fall, against a Republican, if it turns out the congressman is the target of a
federal investigation and the inquiry extends deep into the election year.
Prominent
Democrat, Publicly Critical of Joe Biden Border Policy, Gets a Visit from FBI Jackboots. The political motives
behind this FBI effort are, yet again, brutally transparent. The FBI are for Joe Biden what the Russian FSB is for
Vladimir Putin. That's what they are. That's all they are. That's what they do. How many dozens of
examples does it take before people realize the FBI are criminal enforcers targeting any voices who rise in opposition to the
DC system? Seriously, when is enough, enough? This should be a bipartisan issue. Democrat Representative
Henry Cuellar represents Texas' 28th Congressional District, which extends to the U.S.- Mexico border, and has been in
Congress since 2005. Cuellar has been very public and very critical of how Joe Biden has collapsed the U.S-Mexico border
enforcement. Suddenly, Cuellar becomes the target of the FBI.
The
FBI goes after a Democrat who opposes Biden's border policies. Ask any Democrat or other leftist whether the
FBI was corrupt under J. Edgar Hoover and he or she will eagerly agree. Hoover, an ardent Republican, not only used the
agency to capture genuine criminals, but he also turned it into a spy agency tracking anyone he thought might be a
communist. Now, though, it appears that the FBI, with help from the DOJ, is going Hoover one better, and using all the
old powers plus modern technology to investigate and arrest people who fail to support the Biden administration. The
FBI's latest target is Texas Representative Henry Cuellar, a Democrat, who spoke out against Biden's illegal acts
erasing America's southern border. It's likely that most Americans, and especially most conservative Americans, had no
idea who Henry Cuellar was before Biden entered the White House. However, things changed when Biden issued a series of
orders that effectively erased the southern border.
Biden's
FBI Gestapo Raid the Home of a Fellow Democrat Days After he Turned on Biden's Border Policies. More than two
dozen FBI agents descended on Democrat Rep. Henry Cuellar's Laredo, Texas home on Wednesday, just a day after he spoke
out against Biden's border policy failures. [...] Democrats are quickly realizing that fellow Democrats care less about them
once they're in power and will do absolutely anything to ensure they stay subservient, even if it means having the FBI raid
your house to keep you quiet. [Video clip]
The
FBI's Broken Relationship with Us. All large organizations suffer from the occasional presence of bad
actors. The FBI is no exception. But it managed to retain a good relationship with the public in spite of its
flaws, because it was still solving rather than creating crimes. But something fundamentally changed in the last five
years. The Comey clown car arrived in the center ring and unloaded under the spotlight. As the public watched the
comedy of James "The Cardinal" Comey, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, and Lisa Page, searching for phantom Russian colluders
under the bed, while actual Russian colluders cheered them on, we knew we needed to take a closer look. The examination
has been shocking.
Durham's
Investigation: Incriminating Inference in the FBI's Empty Russiagate Predication. The vaporous
predication for the FBI's opening of its "Crossfire Hurricane" investigation of "Russian collusion" is often attributed
solely to anti-Trump bias, with no more to learn from its study. But sustained examination shows it to be not only
pretextual but also designed to conceal American history's most insidious governmental treachery since Benedict Arnold.
According to the FBI, the "Crossfire Hurricane" investigation was opened on July 31, 2016, because lowly Trump aide George
Papadopoulos had been told by one Professor Joseph Mifsud that Russia had emails harmful to Hillary Clinton. Two weeks
later, Australian (FFG) diplomat, British-connected Alexander Downer, pried from Papadopoulos that Russia had dirt on
Hillary, which he repeated in July to an American embassy in London. Because both Mifsud and Downer were Western
intelligence plants, without any knowledge of Russian designs, this was clearly a bootstrapped, circular predication.
That millions of common citizens also suspected Russia had email dirt on Hillary did not seem to dampen FBI ardor.
Treasure
hunters demand answers from FBI about search for civil war-era gold. Treasure hunters who believe they found a
huge cache of fabled US civil war-era gold in Pennsylvania are now on the prowl for something as elusive as the buried booty
itself: government records of the FBI's excavation. Finders Keepers, a lost treasure locate and recovery service, filed
a federal lawsuit against the justice department over its failure to produce documents on the FBI's search for the legendary
gold, which took place nearly four years ago at a remote woodland site in north-western Pennsylvania. Up to 52 gold
bars were said to have been buried in a forest in Pennsylvania during the battle of Gettysburg. "With its request
Plaintiff seeks to confirm the FBI's recovery of Civil War-era gold buried in the mountains of Pennsylvania, based in
significant part on scientific evidence of the gold's existence that Plaintiff provided the FBI," the lawsuit said.
Is
The FBI Ever Going To Get Around To Finding The Jan. 6 Pipe Bomber, Or Nah? One year after a mysterious hooded
figure placed two explosives outside the Republican and Democrat national headquarters, federal investigators, corporate
media, and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi's Jan. 6 commission are mum about the premeditated act of violence. [...]
Leftists and their cronies in the corporate media have scrambled to pin the violence from last year on former President
Donald Trump and conservatives concerned about election integrity. They claim that Republican officials and Fox News
hosts worked together to plan an "insurrection" against the government. Yet the lone example of a very clearly
premeditated attempt at violence on Jan. 6 has been nearly completely wiped from the memory of the American
public. The pipe bombs discovered at the RNC and DNC aren't mentioned in the press's "remembrance" coverage of the day,
and the federal government has hardly offered any updates on the investigation since releasing footage of the suspect, who
was covered head to toe in dark clothing. Even the Jan. 6 commission, which has gone to great lengths to obtain
the phone records of private citizens, doesn't seem interested in pursuing the person behind the explosives.
They
do not want Ghislaine to sing. In June 2016, the FBI investigated Hillary's sale of state secrets to foreign
governments. Then the FBI destroyed the evidence. At the same time, the FBI lied on FISA applications to spy on
Donald John Trump. Incredibly, the FISA judge denied the request. My understanding is federal judges approve 99%
of these requests for domestic spying. Establishment mocking of "conspiracy theories" is laughable because the
establishment created and promoted the ridiculous Russian Collusion theory that holds that Trump and Putin conspired to fix
the election. Given that the Kremlin was the source for most of the Russian dossier, it is more likely that Hillary and
Obama conspired with Putin. The FBI has a lengthy history of infiltrating organizations. That helped destroy the
KKK, which was a good thing. Curiously, the FBI never infiltrated the Mafia which flourished under J. Edgar
Hoover. In fact, the FBI enabled Whitey Bulger to become the No. 1 mobster in Massachusetts by prosecuting his
rivals. His brother was the Democrat leader of the state Senate.
What
Do We Do with the FBI Now? The events of the past five or six years have demonstrated to America that the FBI
is no longer the unbiased law enforcement agency it once was. Between the Hillary Clinton investigation-in-name-only,
the Crossfire Hurricane hoax, the targeting of Americans as domestic terrorists, and playing three blind mice with the Biden
graft machine, the bureau's issues can't be ignored any longer. If we don't take corrective action soon, the FBI will
finish its transition from law enforcement to being a political functionary advancing the interests of one party. There
are only two options: rehabilitate the FBI, or eliminate it. The current state is unacceptable in a functioning
constitutional republic. We need a credible and competent federal law enforcement capability. Sadly, the FBI has
lost it claim on both those things.
Prosecutors
or Praetorian Guard: Why is FBI investigating one missing diary in a sea of smash and grabs? With smash
and grabs raging across the country, prosecutors have struggled to assure the public that they are cracking down on the crime
wave and using every possible means to deter the organized thefts. One group notably missing in this effort has been
the federal prosecutors. While Attorney General Merrick Garland was criticized for launching a federal task force on
threats against school boards (based on a handful of local cases), he has been largely silent on any federal effort to deal
with this actual crime wave. That is despite the fact that these attacks are organized on social media and experts
think it's likely the stolen items are being sold on the internet. That is all interstate conduct and would allow for
federal enforcement. There is, however, one allegedly stolen item that did bring a full-scale FBI investigation:
the missing diary of Ashley Biden, daughter of President Joe Biden.
How
Did the FBI End Up in This Mess? The fact that the FBI has lost its way has been on public display for at least
five years now. Truth be told, it probably strayed off course way before that. But during the Trump Presidency,
it became too obvious to ignore. It has been involved in everything from the creation of an "insurance policy" against
the peaceful transition of power, to the targeting of parents as domestic terrorists for the sin of disagreeing with school
boards. How did our "premier law enforcement agency" stray so far from its motto of fidelity, bravery, and
integrity? Simply put, the FBI's current state is the result of horrible leadership. Any organization with a
solid culture of ethics can survive a bad leader, but the FBI has had 20+ years of ethically challenged leadership.
Over time that leadership influences hiring, firing, promotions, and training. Given enough time under bad leadership,
even the strongest foundation of ethics will crumble, and be replaced by a culture of corruption — as we've seen
with the FBI[.] A significant shift in the culture of the FBI happened under Robert Mueller. Mueller came up
through the ranks of the DoJ — holding the positions of Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney, and Deputy
Attorney General. He was appointed to lead the FBI, by President George W. Bush, in 2001, just one week prior
to 9/11.
Does
a Law Enforcement Oath Mean Anything Anymore? I had coffee recently with a friend of mine, a retired FBI
agent. We were talking about the mess the FBI has become. He's even more disturbed about the politicization of
the bureau than I am. During our talk he said something very interesting: "Current agents are just keeping their
heads down and following orders." A simple statement with profound implications. [...] Certainly, following lawful orders is
important, but notice that there is nothing mentioned about obedience to leadership. That's because following orders is
between the officers and their leaders. [...] All law enforcement officers, including FBI agents, who are "just following
orders" are missing the point of their oath. They may be bound by agency rules to follow orders, but they are bound by
sacred honor to remain faithful to the American people.
Four
FBI officials hired prostitutes overseas, inspector general says. The Justice Department Office of the
Inspector General on Tuesday said four FBI officials hired prostitutes while on the job. In an investigative summary,
the department watchdog said the officials were on assignment overseas when they "solicited, procured, and accepted
commercial sex" in violation of FBI and Justice Department policies. A fifth official reportedly solicited, but did not
hire, a prostitute. "The OIG investigation further found that five officials failed to report contact or relationships
with foreign nationals, including foreign nationals from whom they procured commercial sex, in violation of FBI policies,"
the summary states.
Fortenberry indictment
raises questions about the FBI's tactics. The Justice Department's prosecution of a Republican lawmaker for
allegedly lying to the FBI is raising thorny issues about the use of surreptitious tactics during investigations into members
of Congress. The false-statement indictment brought against Rep. Jeff Fortenberry of Nebraska two months ago is
also resurfacing many of the same questions that triggered a firestorm of controversy around the prosecution of former
national security adviser Michael Flynn. Critics say the concerns — about the approval process and threshold
to deploy arguably deceptive investigative tactics — are even more acute in Fortenberry's case because of the role
the Constitution lays out for lawmakers as part of a separate branch of government. "This goes back to the age-old
question. ... What is the separation-of-powers implication of having the FBI and the Justice Department test members for
probity? I just think that's wrong," said Stan Brand, a Washington attorney and former general counsel to the
House. "I think it's a mistake, and I think it's a problem."
Losing
Confidence in the Pillars of Our Civilization. For the first time in memory, conservatives now connect the FBI
hierarchy with bureaucratic bloat, political bias, and even illegality. In the last five years, the FBI was mostly in
the news for the checkered careers of James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Robert Mueller, Lisa Page, and Peter Strzok. Add in
the criminality of convicted FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith. The colossal FBI-driven "Russian collusion" hoax was marked
by leaking of confidential FBI memos, forged documents, improper surveillance, and serial disinformation.
Onward Into Darkness.
[Scroll down] Next was the FBI's invasion of Project Veritas chief James O'Keefe's home in a case involving "Joe
Biden's" daughter Ashley Biden's personal diary, which Project Veritas was alleged to be holding, and which supposedly
contained some entries about sketchy father-and-daughter showers together. Bad optics for a floundering president
already suspected of being a bit free with his touch, shall we say, around the little ones (not to mention the florid
pornographic exploits self-documented by son Hunter). Instead of defending Mr. O'Keefe's first amendment rights, the
legacy news media piled on him as "not a real journalist." More to the point, though, within hours of the FBI
confiscating Mr. O'Keefe's cell phones and other devices, Mr. O'Keefe's private communications with his attorneys
turned up in the hands of The New York Times, which published some of the material. Of course, James O'Keefe is
in the middle of a defamation lawsuit against The New York Times. And wasn't it a fortuitous coincidence that the
newspaper came into possession of their adversary's privileged information? The thing is (of course), that the info
could have only been provided to The Times by one possible source: the FBI, investigative arm of the DOJ. Days
later, Judge Analisa Torres from the Southern District of New York ordered the FBI to stop extracting data from the
phones — as if they hadn't already downloaded every last shred and made a zillion copies. Where is the DOJ
Inspector General Michael Horowitz? Where is the DOJ's ethics office? Why has the leaker not been outed and arraigned?
Why
The Left Keeps Talking About Kyle Rittenhouse Crossing A State Line. [Scroll down] Now consider that last
week, ten FBI agents with a battering ram showed up before dawn to handcuff the underwear-clad Project Veritas founder James
O'Keefe and search his house and cell phone, after having done the same to his fellow journalists. The pretext was a
search for Ashley Biden's diary, but the FBI already knew O'Keefe didn't have it or have anything to do with its
disappearance. Besides, since when does a petty-larceny case local police would manage with a stolen-property report
rate a federal investigation? Glenn Greenwald frames it as an undisguised authoritarian tactic meant "to aggressively
target an organization devoted to obtaining and reporting incriminating information about Democratic Party leaders and their
liberal allies." Interestingly, he reports "a cryptic reference in the search warrant to transmitting stolen material
across state lines."
First
Mom Raided By FBI Since October 4th DOJ Memorandum? An FBI SWAT team raided the home of an activist mother of
three in Colorado on Tuesday, Nov. 16, knocking down her door, bursting into the house and handcuffing her while she was
homeschooling her children. This is the first known case of the federal government making good on its promise to not
only intimidate but actually carry out a raid on a mom who was involved in her local school board politics, said Brannon
Howse, who interviewed Sheronna Bishop on his live broadcast at Lindell TV Wednesday night. [...] The U.S. Department of
Justice and Attorney General Merrick Garland issued an Oct. 4 memorandum directing federal, state and local law enforcement
to look for parents to prosecute nationwide who may have made "threats" and made "harassing" phone calls to school board
members nationwide, equating such parents to domestic terrorists. Now a mother, Sheronna Bishop of Grand Junction,
Colorado, has felt the brute force of the FBI's heavily armed SWAT unit used against her family.
Can
the FBI Be Salvaged? The Washington, D.C.-based Federal Bureau of Investigation has lost all credibility as a
disinterested investigatory agency. Now we learn from a whistleblower that the agency was allegedly investigating moms
and dads worried about the teaching of critical race theory in their kids' schools. In truth, since 2015, the FBI has
been constantly in the news — and mostly in a negative and constitutionally disturbing light. The fired
former Director James Comey injected himself into the 2016 political race by constantly editorializing on his ongoing
investigation of candidate Hillary Clinton's email leaks. In a bizarre twist, the public learned later that Comey had
allowed Hillary Clinton's own private computer contractor — CrowdStrike — to run the investigation of
the hack. The private firm was allowed to keep possession of pertinent hard drives central to the investigation.
How odd that CrowdStrike's point man was Shawn Henry, a former high-ranking FBI employee. During the Robert Mueller
special investigation, the FBI implausibly claimed it had no idea how requested information on FBI cell phones had
mysteriously disappeared.
Kyle Rittenhouse,
Project Veritas, and the Inability to Think in Terms of Principles. The FBI has executed a string of search
warrants targeting the homes and cell phones of Project Veritas founder James O'Keefe and several others associated with that
organization. It should require no effort to understand why it is a cause for concern that a Democratic administration
is using the FBI to aggressively target an organization devoted to obtaining and reporting incriminating information about
Democratic Party leaders and their liberal allies. That does not mean the FBI investigation is inherently
improper. Journalists are no more entitled than any other citizen to commit crimes. If there is reasonable cause
to believe O'Keefe and his associates committed federal crimes, then an FBI investigation is warranted as it is for any other
case. But there has been no evidence presented that O'Keefe or Project Veritas employees have done anything of the
sort, nor any explanation provided to justify these invasive searches. That we should want and need that is
self-evident: if the Trump-era FBI had executed search warrants inside the newsrooms of The New York Times and NBC
News, we would be demanding evidence to prove it was legally justified. Yet virtually nothing has been provided to
justify the FBI's targeting of O'Keefe and his colleagues, and the little that has been disclosed by way of justifying this
makes no sense.
FBI's
behavior over Project Veritas investigation questioned. Scrutiny of the FBI's handling of an investigation into
Project Veritas is mounting following the publication of details from documents potentially seized by federal
authorities. The New York Times published an article on Thursday detailing the extent to which operatives from
the controversial right-wing investigative group coordinated with attorneys to ensure they did not flout laws dictating
private recordings and obtaining information from sources using false pretenses. The New York Times cited "a
series of memos written by the group's lawyer" in its article questioning Project Veritas's approach to investigating various
targets, including the FBI itself.
FBI
Email Server Hacked, Emails Sent To Over 100,000 Accounts. The Federal Bureau of Investigation said Saturday
that one of its email servers was hacked and spam emails had been sent to the public. From the FBI's email server,
unauthorized emails were sent to over 100,000 accounts. They were doctored to look like authentic communication from
the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security, according to Forbes. The emails warned people that they were being
attacked by the cybercriminal group, The Dark Overlord, and cybersecurity researcher, Vinny Troia, according to Bloomberg.
The breach was discovered by the Spamhaus Project, a cybersecurity watchdog organization. The group sent out a tweet
early on Nov. 13 stating that they were aware of the spam emails.
The
DOJ and FBI have combined to destroy Project Veritas. Project Veritas uses hidden camera techniques to expose
corruption, dishonesty, anarchy, and totalitarian impulses in American institutions. Given the times in which we live,
that means Project Veritas is usually exposing leftists and their organizations. It's almost certainly not a
coincidence, then, that the FBI engaged in a series of early-morning raids against Project Veritas employees and its founder,
James O'Keefe, ostensibly because, a year ago, they possessed, but refused to use (and gave to law enforcement), a diary that
we now know belonged to Joe Biden's pathetic, drug-addicted daughter, Ashley. It's even less of a coincidence that the
New York Times immediately knew about the raids and later published Project Veritas's confidential correspondence with its
attorneys. What we're witnessing is a political hit job that would be completely at home in any penny-ante,
third-world, tin pot tyranny — in other words, welcome to Biden's America.
Court
Halts DOJ Extraction of James O'Keefe's Smartphone Data. A federal judge Thursday [11/11/2021] ordered the U.S.
Department of Justice to stop the extraction of data from Project Veritas founder James O'Keefe's smartphone, pending a court
hearing on the appointment of a "special master" to oversee the extraction. [...] The DOJ has O'Keefe's phone and other data
following an FBI raid earlier this month of O'Keefe's New York home, ostensibly looking for information related to the
alleged theft of a diary belonging to Ashley Biden, President Joe Biden's daughter. O'Keefe said at the time that
Project Veritas was provided with the diary by another source, but decided not to use any of the information contained
therein, and contacted law enforcement. It is unclear why the FBI conducted the raid, and critics have pointed out that
the government's actions could also be an attempt to suppress an opposition-minded journalist.
The FBI raided Project Veritas
on a pretext and is now leaking their privileged communications to the New York Times. [Thread reader] These
are classic privileged communications[.] PV asked for a legal opinion on potential journalistic activities, that opinion
is a privileged communication[.] No idea what @adamgoldmanNYT was thinking here, he should be subpoenaed tomorrow and
forced to reveal his criminal source[.] I didn't even think about the fact that PV is currently in litigation with the
New York Times[.] Makes it all the more appalling that the NYT would be publishing Veritas' privileged communications[.]
If the New York Times has these memorandums[,] why wouldn't it also have PV's privileged communications that relate directly to
PV's lawsuit against the Times? This is just a massive, massive scandal[.] The New York Times delenda est[.]
Federal
court orders Justice Department to stop extracting data from James O'Keefe's phones. A federal court ordered
the Justice Department to stop extracting data from phones belonging to Project Veritas founder James O'Keefe after the FBI
searched his New York apartment and the homes of two operatives over the past week. Harmeet Dhillon, a civil rights
attorney representing the conservative investigative group, shared the order signed by U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres on
Thursday [11/11/2021]. The order said the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York reviewed the
petitioner's motion for an appointment of a special master on Wednesday and ordered the government to "confirm via email it
has paused its extraction and review of the contents of Petitioner O'Keefe's phones" by Friday.
The
FBI Raid of Project Veritas Turns Into a Massive Scandal After Privileged Communications Are Leaked. As
RedState reported, Project Veritas has found itself in the crosshairs of the FBI recently. That began with a raid on
the homes of several of its journalists under the guise of looking for Ashley Biden's diary. Apparently, a stolen diary
is now in the purview of federal authorities. Will they be investigating bike thefts next? But what was so
disturbing, besides the raids happening in the first place, was how quickly The New York Times knew about them. While
O'Keefe was asked by the FBI to keep quiet, the Times knew within hours, pointing to a leaker within the bureau.
Some
Heads Better Roll at the FBI and DOJ After the Project Veritas Document Leak. I have been struggling for a
while to justify the existence of the FBI. After learning during the Trump Administration that the Department of Justice had
been weaponized to investigate Trump as a means to generate a case that might derail his candidacy, I thought that the
agency, to which I once applied for a career, had become a hollow shell of the J. Edgar days. As stories were revealed
about lovestruck FBI employees engaging in an affair that included text messages of their Shakespearian suicide pact to take
down Trump, I figured that the media would turn on the FBI and discredit anything regarding that pending investigation as
biased nonsense. I mean, this had to be a bridge too far for even the liberal media, right? But no, it wasn't.
Where Are the
Neon-Hatted Proud Boys? Asteady drip of information continues to reveal that the Federal Bureau of
Investigation played a much larger — perhaps central — role before and during the Capitol protest than
initially believed. And unanswered questions as to why certain co-conspirators or alleged instigators have not yet been
charged while others who played a far lesser role face serious charges are fueling mounting suspicions that January 6 was an
inside job rather than an "insurrection" incited by President Donald Trump. After months of speculation about the use
of FBI assets, first raised by Darren Beattie at Revolver News, the New York Times confirmed in September that
at least two informants embedded with the Proud Boys were in close contact with their FBI handlers that day.
FBI
Sharply Increases Investigations of 'Domestic Extremism,' But Where's the Evidence It Even Exists? FBI and
Homeland Security Department officials on Thursday reiterated yet again one of the most frequently repeated refrains of the
Biden administration: that "white supremacists" and other "domestic extremists" constitute the foremost terror threat the
nation faces. Now the only thing they need to complete the picture are some actual white supremacist extremists, and
the feds are busy working to solve that problem now. But whether they're catching them or creating them is an open
question. [...] Or, as one Twitter user commented, "The FBI did a great job of stopping themselves yet again." Was this
another case of entrapment? Would the plot have existed at all without the informant's role? Given the fiercely
political use of the FBI by Merrick Garland's Justice Department, these are important questions, but the answers may never be
forthcoming. Meanwhile, the FBI is currently pursuing no fewer than 2,700 investigations of "domestic extremism," more
than twice the usual number of such investigations. The dramatic increase in investigations suggests, at least in a
sane world, a response to a sharply increased threat, but Biden's handlers have shown no evidence of a massive spike in
"white supremacist" terrorism.
FBI Lost HD Rittenhouse
Video, Never Told The Defense It Existed. Unseen footage taken by the FBI from the night of the shootings in
Kenosha, Wisconsin, surfaced on Tuesday during day one of Kyle Rittenhouse's trial. According to Jack Posobiec of Human
Events, the FBI allegedly had an HD version of the video but never told the Rittenhouse defense it existed. In footage
obtained by Human Events, the FBI appears to have taken aerial footage of Rittenhouse and the other participants involved in
the shooting. Some of the footage, which is black-and-white and grainy, was shot from an FBI surveillance drone.
Raid
on Project Veritas journalists once again shows the different standards in the application of law. Yesterday
[11/6/2021], reports appeared in The New York Times and elsewhere that the FBI searched the home of James O'Keefe, the
founder of Project Veritas, on Saturday as part of its investigation into the possible theft of a diary belonging to Ashley
Biden, President Biden's daughter. Mr. O'Keefe released a statement acknowledging that the raid had indeed
occurred and that the FBI had taken materials of current and former Project Veritas journalists despite the fact that Project
Veritas's legal team previously contacted the Department of Justice and had voluntarily conveyed unassailable facts that
demonstrated Project Veritas' lack of involvement in criminal activity and/or criminal intent. O'Keefe also states that
the Department of Justice had requested Project Veritas to not disclose anything related to the raid or the associated
subpoenas. However, what astounded them is that within an hour of one of the raids, The New York Times contacted
Project Veritas for comments. O'Keefe was understandably perplexed as to how The New York Times became aware of the
existence and execution of a search warrant.
Details
demanded on banks that reported customers to FBI after Jan. 6. Government watchdog Judicial Watch is in court
seeking communications between the FBI and various banking institutions that apparently have been reporting their customers
to the law-enforcement agency. Judicial Watch said it filed a response to the Department of Justice's opposition to the
Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. The issue is what the banks told the FBI about the customers' transactions around
the Jan. 6 events in Washington, D.C. Judicial Watch spokesman Tom Fitton said, "This Judicial Watch lawsuit shows how the
FBI is corruptly trying to hide that it used the January 6 incident as an excuse to conduct unlawful surveillance of the
American people's bank transactions."
Nobody
at the FBI Was Fooled by Clinton Campaign's Private Operatives. The Brennan notes, coupled with an
investigative referral sent to the FBI, make clear that all the top Department of Justice (DOJ) and FBI officials involved in
accepting fake evidence from private operatives during the course of the 2016 presidential campaign knew they were being
approached by people associated with the Clinton campaign. These federal officials then started investigations of the
Trump campaign and applied for federal surveillance warrants on Trump associates based on this fake information. The
documentary evidence speaks very loudly and very clearly: None of these people at the federal agencies were fooled by
either the fake Steele dossier or the fake Alfa-Bank documents. Not one of them. James Comey, Peter Strzok, and
Andrew McCabe, to just name three of the top people involved, knew all along who these operatives approaching them with these
fake hoaxes were really working for. They had been alerted in July 2016 about what Clinton's campaign was preparing to
do. And then both Comey and Strzok were alerted again in September of 2016 when they received the investigative
referral from the CIA. Yet despite this, Comey and Strzok went ahead and took the Steele dossier from the Clinton
campaign's operatives and made use of it for a federal surveillance warrant in late October of 2016.
The
FBI and the Stolen Diary. The strangest news story of the last few days relates to multiple FBI raids on the
homes of people associated with Project Veritas, including that of founder James O'Keefe. Those who were searched say
that the agents were looking for information related to the alleged theft of a diary belonging to Joe Biden's daughter
Ashley, which the New York Times and other news sources have confirmed. The diary dates to 2019, when Ashley was in a
drug rehab facility. It left her possession under circumstances that are not clear. Someone offered it to Project
Veritas, saying that Ashley had left it in a room at, if I understand correctly, the rehab facility. Ashley evidently
maintains that it was stolen. James O'Keefe says that Project Veritas looked into the matter but was unable to confirm
the authenticity of the document. He says that he offered it to Ashley's lawyers, but they wouldn't take it, so he
turned it over to law enforcement. In any event, Project Veritas never did anything to make its contents public.
FBI
Raids Project Veritas Journalists' Homes Looking for Ashley Biden's Diary. Friday afternoon [11/5/2021] Project
Veritas founder James O'Keefe announced that the homes of current and former Project Veritas journalists had been raided by
FBI agents Thursday morning and that he had been served a Grand Jury subpoena with a cover letter requesting that he not make
the existence of the subpoena known. [...] O'Keefe revealed that Project Veritas' legal team had already been in contact with
the FBI about this matter and gave them information that should have negated any need for a search warrant. What was
the FBI looking for? Who signed the search warrant?
The
FBI Just Admitted Something Terrifying and No One Seems to Be Noticing. Why [...] was there an FBI drone
directly over the [Rittenhouse] shooting? Have we even considered the ramifications of what that actually means?
Our government, for any reason that they perceive to be a threat, can conduct mass surveillance of you without a
warrant? Certainly, this was a public place and the courts have ruled that surveillance can be conducted in public
without a warrant, however, there were local police resources. Why would the FBI be conducting this surveillance if
they had no way of stopping or preventing what was happening, from occurring? Regardless of the legality of it, should
we as citizens become comfortable with the idea that this is normal? [...] And probably most importantly, how did you end up
directly over this shooting that night, despite all the other areas in the city where bad things were happening? While
I have never been a conspiracy theorist and abhor conspiracy theories, it seems wildly coincidental that of the several dozen
square block area of Kenosha where there was violence going down that night, that you end up directly over the one shooting
that is going to cause a national debate? I can't be the only one here thinking that's awfully convenient.
7
Insane Things I Just Learned About How U.S. Elections Are 'Rigged'. [#5] The FBI Is Systemically Biased Towards the Left:
In discussing why Antifa is allowed to threaten peaceful American citizens with violence, Mollie [Hemingway] uncovers one of the political problems
with addressing this: The FBI is systemically biased on behalf of the left. "[T]he agency had long focused its attention on right-wing
extremists and was ill-equipped to deal with threats from the left," she notes. Yes, this is the nation's top law-enforcement agency that
helped hatch the Spygate plot to frame a Republican president. Politically biased — you think?
Biden
FBI Joins Pelosi In Blocking GOP From Investigating January 6. The leading Republican tasked with his party's
investigation into the preparedness and response of the U.S. Capitol Police and other law enforcement agencies to the Capitol
riot on January 6 is being blocked by President Joseph Biden's FBI from gathering information, a new document reveals.
The FBI told Indiana Republican Rep. Jim Banks it would not provide Republicans the same information provided to House
Speaker Nancy Pelosi's hand-picked committee consisting only of Democrat-appointed members. "We respectfully refer you
to the Select Committee regarding issues of access to records and information," the agency wrote in response to a Republican
request for information, referring to the official House panel established by the speaker.
The
'Mystery Man' AG Garland Won't Deny Was a Fed Inciting Jan. 6 Rioters Was Scrubbed from FBI 'Most Wanted' List.
Kentucky Congressman Thomas Massie at a House hearing on Thursday grilled Attorney General Merrick Garland about a 'mystery
man' named Ray Epps, who is suspected of inciting far-right extremists and Trump supporters to storm the Capitol building on
January 6. On January 5, in a video that has been widely viewed on Twitter, Epps can be heard saying: "I don't
even like to say it because I'll be arrested. I'll say it. We need to go into the Capitol." Ray Epps told The
Arizona Republic in a brief telephone interview following the riots that he had traveled to the capitol, but he had been
advised by an attorney not to speak about it.
FBI
incompetence let Anwar al Awlaki slip away, say retired investigators. More than 20 years after 9/11, two key
investigators who made the case their lives' work have revealed they are still haunted by the fact that the FBI let the
terrorists' spiritual adviser slip away, only to inspire more deadly attacks in the name of Islam. In an exclusive
interview, New Jersey criminal investigator Jim Bush and FBI agent Bob Bukowski, who are both retired, told the Washington
Examiner never-revealed details about how they pieced together some of the players behind the plot to hijack four commercial
planes and kill 2,977 people. But the case that capped the careers of two seasoned investigators brought both triumph and
disappointment, and they are only now learning why Imam Anwar al-Awlaki eluded them in the months after the attack.
Christopher
Steele: Product of Corrupt FBI. ABC News anchor George Stephanopoulos has produced a documentary
featuring Christopher Steele, the man responsible for the so-called dossier bearing his name. [P]romotional clips hinted that,
far from a hard-hitting interview exposing Steele for the charlatan he is, Stephanopoulos gave Steele a chance to spin his
story ahead of possible new indictments related to John Durham's inquiry into the Trump-Russia election collusion hoax.
Rather than depict Steele accurately, Stephanopoulos and ABC News social media interns repeatedly describe Steele as an
"ex-British spy" or "former intelligence officer" even though Steele left MI6, the UKs version of the CIA, in 2009 to start a
consulting business. (That same year, Steele presented a report on Russia to President Obama.) Steele's now-discredited
dossier, which Stephanopoulos tries to portray as "raw intelligence," was the basis not just for the entire Russian collusion
hoax but also served as key evidence to support four illicit FISA applications to obtain warrants to spy on Donald Trump and
his associates.
Justice
Department hasn't released Russia documents Trump ordered declassified on last day. Two top Republican senators
are demanding answers from Attorney General Merrick Garland because the Justice Department has failed to release anything in
the "binder" of Crossfire Hurricane documents that former President Donald Trump ordered declassified during his last day in
office. The memo from Trump said he had "determined that the materials in that binder should be declassified to the
maximum extent possible." The FBI said in mid-January that the bureau had "identified the passages that it believed it
was most crucial to keep from public disclosure."
Arrest
of Green Beret Oath Keeper Threatens to Expose FBI's Darkest 1/6 Secrets. The Oath Keepers are the highest-profile
and most extensively prosecuted militia group associated with the events of January 6. So far, the
government has charged a total of 18 Oath Keepers with conspiring to obstruct Congress's certification of the 2020
Presidential Election. This is a serious conspiracy charge that could potentially lead to decades of prison time.
Oddly enough, Oath Keepers founder and leader Stewart Rhodes himself has not been charged with anything, despite the fact
that the government cites Rhodes's own statements and actions as largely constitutive of the conspiracy for which so many of
his underlings face charges. [...] Apart from any charges of conspiracy, there is no doubt that, based on his actions on
January 6, Stewart Rhodes could technically be prosecuted for trespassing on US Capitol grounds. Just last Thursday,
in fact, approximately 20 FBI vehicles swooped in on the home of Oath Keepers associate Jeremy Brown, searched his belongings
for five and a half hours, and took all of his phones and electronics. The feds justified their entire raid on Brown on a
minor alleged "trespassing" offense.
The
FBI Somehow Manages to Become an Even Bigger Joke. Yesterday, RedState reported on the disturbing announcement
by the DOJ that the FBI would now be effectively treating school board protests as domestic terror threats. The
insanity of that can't be overstated. To the extent that there's been unruliness at some local meetings, I'm unaware of
a single serious threat, and even if there has been a physical altercation or two in this massive country of 330 million
people, that hardly qualifies as a terrorist threat. But the suppression of speech through intimidation is the point,
and it's something we've seen repeatedly from Democrat presidents. [...] Yet, today [10/5/2021] the FBI managed to make an
even bigger joke of itself. During a hearing, Rep. Nancy Mace pressed an official who admitted that they do not
even track Antifa violence. Yet, he knew exactly how many cases involving "militias" there were. [Tweet with video
clip] Antifa is by far the most visible domestic terrorist threat in the nation. They run the streets of Portland
and have committed overt acts of violence in cities across the country, including murder. Yet, the FBI doesn't even see
them as worthy of keeping up with? That's an incredibly [bad] admission that confirms what a lot of us have
suspected. Namely, that the FBI seems to only care about domestic terrorism when it fits a certain mold, specifically a
right-wing one.
DeSantis
Throws Down the Gauntlet: Confronts Garland on Troubling FBI Announcement. Attorney General Merrick
Garland made a stunning announcement about having the FBI and U.S. Attorneys' Offices coordinate with federal, state, and
local law enforcement to deal with "threats" of violence against school boards and people working in schools. This
immediately prompted cries from critics that Garland was trying to suppress people objecting to pandemic restrictions and
CRT — two of the hot button issues that have caused many people to come out and object at school board
meetings. While Garland spoke about "threats," he didn't identify any threats or concerns which would qualify as
federal criminal action requiring such interference in the parents' rights to express themselves. Indeed, the
announcement seemed like an effort to basically chill their rights to speak. Normally, if there was any actual
"threat," it would come within the purview of local law enforcement.
Federal
authorities cash in on safety box seizures as owners fight back. Married couple Jeni Pearsons and Michael Store
aren't wealthy. Pearsons works at a nonprofit theater in Los Angeles, and Store is a transportation coordinator in the
film industry. The couple has been saving for retirement for years, buying silver here and there when they could afford
it. To keep their property safe, they rented a safe deposit box at U.S. Private Vaults. They thought everything
was above board until news broke earlier this year about a raid at the Beverly Hills business. The government alleged
that the company conspired with customers to sell drugs, launder money, and stash ill-gotten goods. Armed with a
warrant, FBI and Drug Enforcement Administration agents spent five days ripping several hundred safety deposit boxes out of
the walls and laying claim to its contents. Prosecutors argued they were within their rights and that the boxes
contained weapons and drugs. They also took jewelry, precious metals, and stacks of money to an undisclosed
warehouse. Their final haul was worth around $86 million.
The Symptoms of Our
Insanity. Is there anyone in the recent Washington intelligence and investigatory hierarchy who has not lied or
feigned loss of memory under oath — a low bar that nevertheless excludes, among others, John Brennan, James
Clapper, James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Robert Mueller, or Peter Strzok?
It's
Time to Break Up the FBI. FBI director Christopher Wray says that he would like to do away with encrypted
messenger services like Signal that I and many of my friends and colleagues use to communicate with each other. Wray
claims that would make it easier to counter so-called "domestic extremism" that he and secretary of homeland security
Alejandro Mayorkas, not to mention most of the staff of MSNBC, CNN, and the New York Times, are insisting (forget al-Qaeda,
et al.) is the greatest threat to our nation today. You know, folks like that hapless fellow in horns that's been in
solitary confinement since Jan. 6 as if he were a serial killer, he and those thousands of other "terrorists" and
"insurrectionists," only one of whom, it turns out, had a gun, who stormed (or were they waved in) to the Capitol that
day. But truth to tell, the very reason I — and I assume others — am on Signal and Telegraph is
to stay as far as possible from prying prevaricators like Wray and Mayorkas and, most of all, from the organizations they
lead. I recommend others do the same.
Abolish
the FBI. In ignoring the latest John Durham indictment, most of the media and official Washington are ignoring
the elephant between its lines: the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Mr. Durham, the special counsel appointed to
investigate the government's handling of the Russia collusion mess, levels a single criminal charge against Michael Sussmann,
then a lawyer for the Democrat-linked firm Perkins Coie. In delivering to the FBI fanciful evidence of Trump-Russia collusion
a few weeks before the 2016 election, Mr. Sussmann is alleged to have lied to the FBI's chief lawyer, James Baker, claiming
he was acting on his own behalf and not as a paid agent of the Clinton campaign. [Paywall]
FBI
says fortune seized in Beverly Hills raid was criminals' loot. Owners say: Where's the proof? After
the FBI seized Joseph Ruiz's life savings during a raid on a safe deposit box business in Beverly Hills, the unemployed chef
went to court to retrieve his $57,000. A judge ordered the government to tell Ruiz why it was trying to confiscate the
money. It came from drug trafficking, an FBI agent responded in court papers. Ruiz's income was too low for him
to have that much money, and his side business selling bongs made from liquor bottles suggested he was an unlicensed pot
dealer, the agent wrote. The FBI also said a dog had smelled unspecified drugs on Ruiz's cash. The FBI was
wrong. When Ruiz produced records showing the source of his money was legitimate, the government dropped its false
accusation and returned his money.
What
If the FBI Threw an Insurrection and Nobody Came? [Scroll down] The FBI wouldn't do that, would
they? Actually they have a long history of such actions. Here are just a few examples. Richard Jewell was
falsely accused by the FBI or bombing the Olympic Park in Atlanta in 1996. The FBI entrapped General Michael Flynn,
destroying his life through a multi-year legal battle. At least 12 of the 18 supposed would-be kidnappers of Michigan
Gov. were FBI informants. Then there is Spygate, a fabricated tale woven by the Clinton campaign, FBI, and DOJ to
seditiously undermine a presidential election and subsequent administration. Lastly was the FBI's botched investigation
over sexual abuse of Olympic gymnasts. Abusing young women was an unimportant matter for the FBI yet they sent 15
special agents lickety-split to investigate a garage door pull handle in NASCAR driver Bubba Wallace's garage that supposedly
looked like a noose. Back to the J6 rally. Anyone with half a brain could see that this was another FBI
entrapment scheme, to justify more arrests and more prisoners in solitary confinement awaiting trial for walking benignly
through the U.S. Capitol.
When
will the FBI answer for its many failures? Four U.S. gymnastics stars testified Wednesday before the Senate
Judiciary Committee about the horrifying abuse they suffered at the hands of national team doctor Larry Nassar. But
Nassar wasn't the only culprit, according to these women: The FBI also failed them by refusing to take their reports
seriously and, in at least one case, changing the records in an attempt to deflect blame from the agency. [...] This is just
the latest example of rot within the FBI. The agency has proved repeatedly that it is incompetent and incapable of fulfilling
its mission to protect and defend Americans. FBI officials failed to act ahead of the 2016 Pulse nightclub shooting and
the 2018 Parkland school shooting despite being tipped off about both ahead of time. They refused to prosecute mass
sexual abuser Jeffrey Epstein even after new evidence of his abuse emerged in 2016. And they failed to investigate the
allegations against Nassar, allowing hundreds of other young women to suffer unbearable abuse. You might ask, is there
anything the FBI has done? Of course. The agency spent three years investigating easily debunked claims of
collusion between former President Donald Trump's 2016 campaign and Russia. It helped organize a plot to kidnap
Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, and it raided the home of a protester involved in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot and
seized his lego set. Don't you feel safe?
Here's
What to Do if the FBI's 'Sedition Hunters' Show Up at Your Door. There have been multiple reports that the FBI
is showing up on the doorsteps of Republican voters in order to hunt down "extremists." The AP reported that the FBI is
using citizen snitch groups to hunt down January 6 protest participants. [...] Never mind that people who were at the January
6 event who did not engage in any violence and are guilty of nothing more than trespassing are facing major jail time.
One is comedian and political commentator Tim Gionet, aka "Baked Alaska." Gionet live-streamed his walk through the
Capitol and interviewed many of the protesters there. He did not appear to engage in any violence but he is facing
twenty years in federal prison. Gionet sat down for an interview with Milo Yiannopoulos on YouTube — which
is now unavailable because YouTube deleted Milo's account last week. Gionet shared the brutal treatment he received at
the hands of the FBI, including threats to lock him up for twenty years if he did not give up the identities of some of the
people in the Capitol with him.
Hunt
for Capitol attackers still on 6 months after Jan. 6. The first waves of arrests in the deadly siege at the
U.S. Capitol focused on the easy targets. Dozens in the pro-Trump mob openly bragged about their actions on Jan. 6 on
social media and were captured in shocking footage broadcast live by national news outlets. But six months after the
insurrection, the Justice Department is still hunting for scores of rioters, even as the first of more than 500 people
already arrested have pleaded guilty. The struggle reflects the massive scale of the investigation and the grueling
work still ahead for authorities in the face of an increasing effort by some Republican lawmakers to rewrite what happened
that day.
FBI show up at mans property
over Facebook group. [Three video clips]
FBI
Allegedly Funded White Supremacist Publisher: Court Documents. The FBI allegedly paid a publisher of
white supremacist literature more than $144,000 over 16-plus years to serve as a confidential informant, according to recent
filings in an ongoing domestic extremism case. These allegations were made earlier this month by Kaleb Cole, an accused
member of the white supremacist group Atomwaffen. Cole was arrested in February 2020 for allegedly participating in an
Atomwaffen intimidation campaign against Jewish people and journalists of color. On Aug. 13, Cole filed a motion to
suppress evidence seized during the FBI's search of his Texas home. According to Cole, the FBI failed to disclose the
sordid background of one of its confidential informants in the bureau's application for a search warrant. "The CI
[confidential informant] is a convicted felon and currently owns and operates a publishing company that distributes white
supremacist writings," Cole said in his Aug. 13 filing.
You
will never guess who's paying for American Nazi literature. Sean Davis's tweet was an eye-opener: "The
FBI was using taxpayer money to secretly publish satanic, Neo-Nazi propaganda? Real shocker right there. The FBI
is a corrupt, trash organization that is destroying America." And no, Davis wasn't having some sort of stress-induced
breakdown. He was pointing to a series of tweets by Ali Winston, an investigative reporter, who was following a filing
in the federal case against Kaleb Cole, an American Neo-Nazi. [...] Broken down into simpler terms, Kaleb Cole filed a motion
to suppress evidence seized from his home. To support this motion, he alleged that the government had a confidential
informant who had worked for the FBI for 16 years. During that time, the confidential informant received $140,000 from
the FBI, over $78,000 of which (plus another $4,378 for expenses) came while he was cuddling up to Cole. The
confidential informant isn't some cool Serpico-like guy, burying himself among the bad guys to bring them down.
Instead, he's a convicted felon who owns a white supremacist publishing company. It was he who put together all the
information being used against Cole.
FBI
Starts Cover Story to Cloud Their Involvement in January 6th Events — Now Claim No Evidence of Coordination For J6
Insurrection. The motive for the FBI to say there is "scant evidence" of any coordinated group activity in the
January 6th Capitol Hill events is transparent. The FBI need to cloud their involvement, their coordination, their
agents, their planted informants and the FBI direction in the events. Reuters is writing today that current and former
FBI officials have reversed course and said there is scant evidence that any right-wing or extremist group coordinated any
attack on Capitol Hill.
Tucker
Carlson sees coverup plot behind announcement FBI found little evidence of coordination among Jan. 6
demonstrators. Most conservative commentators have reacted with glee to a report from Reuters that:
["]The FBI has found scant evidence that the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol was the result of an organized plot to
overturn the presidential election result, according to four current and former law enforcement officials.["] [...]
But Tucker Carlson, the most important conservative commentator of the moment, takes his reasoning a full step farther.
In a segment of the Friday edition of Tucker Carlson Tonight, he asked, "Why is the FBI exonerating people?"
After reviewing the months of the 180 degrees opposite narrative, put out by the FBI and broadcast by the progressive media,
that an organized insurrection took place, he suggests a sinister motive behind the leaked story to Reuters. "If there
was organization going on, some of it came from the feds." As has often been the case, the FBI placed informants, or
perhaps agents provocateur is the better term, among the demonstrators. In fact, there are upwards of 20
unindicted co-conspirators from the January 6 incident, and a good number of these may have been ringleaders on the FBI
payroll, escaping prosecution for acts that were worse than the crimes for which others have been prosecuted.
FBI
Destroys Insurrection Narrative: 'Scant Evidence' Capitol Riots was Coordinated. Sources told Reuters the FBI
has not found much evidence that proves anyone coordinated the Capitol Hill riot: ["]Though federal officials have
arrested more than 570 alleged participants, the FBI at this point believes the violence was not centrally coordinated by
far-right groups or prominent supporters of then-President Donald Trump, according to the sources, who have been either
directly involved in or briefed regularly on the wide-ranging investigations.["]
The
FBI Finally Proves That Donald Trump Had Nothing to Do with Jan. 6 'Insurrection'. The Federal Bureau of
Investigation did not set out to prove Donald Trump had nothing to do with the January 6 events that have been characterized
as an "insurrection" and a "coup." But a new exclusive report from Reuters obliterates the essential claims that Donald Trump
directed extremists to attack the Capitol building and urged protesters to thwart a peaceful transfer of power. "The
FBI has found scant evidence that the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol was the result of an organized plot to overturn the
presidential election result, according to four current and former law enforcement officials," Reuters reported.
"Though federal officials have arrested more than 570 alleged participants, the FBI at this point believes the violence was
not centrally coordinated by far-right groups or prominent supporters of then-President Donald Trump, according to the sources,
who have been either directly involved in or briefed regularly on the wide-ranging investigations," the report continued.
FBI Finds Scant
Evidence Of Any Coordination On Jan 6, Hardly The Insurrection The Media Wanted You to Believe. Corroboration
from an FBI report on the Jan. 6 riots has concluded that the storming of the U.S. Capitol bore no relation to a political
agenda devised by the GOP, or former President Trump. According to the investigation — exclusively released
by Reuters — observing participants arrested at the Capitol on Jan. 6, collective information revealed that well
over 90 percent of people stated no allegiance to a GOP-inspired objective during the rioting. "Ninety to ninety-five
percent of these are one-off cases. Then you have five percent, maybe, of these militia groups that were more closely
organized." The remaining few in this group were self-proclaimed political extremists, whose only concrete goal was to
break into the Capitol — without a clue beyond this step.
FBI
finds Capitol storming wasn't organized by pro-Trump groups: Reuters. The Federal Bureau of Investigation
(FBI) has found that the January 6 storming of the United States Capitol was not organized by pro-Donald Trump groups as part
of a plot to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election, four current and former law enforcement officials said,
according to Reuters on Friday [8/20/2021]. More than 570 alleged participants have been arrested since the demonstration,
but the FBI believes they are almost all "one-off cases" and not due to a centrally coordinated "far-right" effort, nor are they
the result of an organized push by then-President Donald Trump supporters.
FBI
Finally Admits there Is "Scant Evidence" US Capitol Attack Was Coordinated — The "Organized Plot" Talking Point Was a Massive Lie!
It only took this corrupt organization seven months to finally report the truth. The FBI admitted this week there was
"scant evidence" the US Capitol "attack" was coordinated. We knew this when it happened. The dirtbags at the FBI
finally admitted this today. Chris Wray and James Comey DESTROYED the once-respected intelligence organization.
Maybe someday an honest FBI agent will leak out the details on the informants and plants they had in the crowd that
day? And, yet the FBI continues to arrest grandmas and actors who walked inside the US Capitol that day, many of whom
were waved in by the police. So will the FBI ever admit that US Capitol Police killed two conservative women that day?
FBI
finds scant evidence U.S. Capitol attack was coordinated - sources. Though federal officials have arrested more
than 570 alleged participants, the FBI at this point believes the violence was not centrally coordinated by far-right groups
or prominent supporters of then-President Donald Trump, according to the sources, who have been either directly involved in
or briefed regularly on the wide-ranging investigations. "Ninety to ninety-five percent of these are one-off cases,"
said a former senior law enforcement official with knowledge of the investigation. "Then you have five percent, maybe,
of these militia groups that were more closely organized. But there was no grand scheme with Roger Stone and Alex Jones
and all of these people to storm the Capitol and take hostages."
FBI
Investigation Just Blew Up the Dem Narrative about the Capitol Riot. [Scroll down] Just like the Russia
collusion hoax, here's yet another lie that's blown up on them. The FBI investigators found that while some of the
people might have wanted to break into the Capitol, there was "no evidence" that they had serious plans about what to do if
they made it inside. This is why they didn't file any sedition charges. Oh. So the folks who argue that
this was about overthrowing the government folks also get dealt a huge blow with this. So in essence, we are talking
about what we've always been talking about here — a riot. BLM/Antifa rioted/attacked the Portland federal
court house for more than 100 days, coming out with the same people. Yet their pictures aren't posted to be
investigated on their own page, most weren't held and none of those leaders appears to have been identified or even pursued,
despite the obvious organizing of it all over more than a year.
71-Year-Old
Grandmother Visited By FBI Over Attending January Trump Rally. Coweta County School Board Member Linda Menk, a
71-year-old grandmother who lives in the rural community 40 miles southwest of Atlanta, says she was paid a visit by a pair
of FBI agents for attending former President Donald Trump's now-infamous D.C. rally on Jan. 6. "It wasn't festive, but
it was friendly," Menk said of the rally, telling The Federalist she remained on the outskirts of the crowd at Trump's White
House speech, standing on the grounds of the Washington Monument to watch the jumbotron from afar. "That was kind of
where we camped out so-to-speak," attending with a group she met in her hotel the night before since she got separated from
those she drove from Georgia with.
FBI
Knew Of Hunter Biden's Missing Laptop As Early As December 2019. The FBI knew as early as December 2019 that
Hunter Biden believed Russians had stolen his laptop, which he believed made him vulnerable to blackmail because of
compromising evidence on the laptop combined with his father's presidential ambitions. This explosive revelation
establishes that either Joe Biden lied to the American public, or the intelligence community lied to him. When The New
York Post went public in October 2020 with videos, text messages, and emails from an abandoned MacBook laptop belonging to
Hunter Biden, Joe Biden told Americans the laptop was a Russian hoax. But now Brian Della Rocca, an attorney
representing John Paul Mac Isaac, has told me that the video of Hunter Biden telling a prostitute he thought Russians had
stolen a second laptop, leaving him susceptible to blackmail, was "definitely on the hard drive" of the Biden MacBook
abandoned at Isaac's shop and later seized by the FBI.
IG:
FBI employees contacted journalists who reported classified information before 2016 election. The Justice
Department, after a years-long investigation, says it still cannot pinpoint who in the FBI leaked "non-public" information to
the press in 2016 about the agency's probe of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server,
according to a report by the department's inspector general. In the 10-page report released Thursday, Inspector General
Michael E. Horowitz said officials were also unable to link any evidence of FBI leaks to former Trump lawyer Rudolph
Giuliani, who said in the days leading up to the 2016 election that then-presidential candidate Donald Trump had some "pretty
big surprises" to reveal.
FBI
agent in hot water for using provocative pics of female colleagues to lure sex-traffickers. An unnamed FBI
agent was the subject of a recent investigation by the Department of Justice that revealed he was using provocative photos of
female staffers as bait in an undercover sex-trafficking sting. Although his intentions may have been noble, Justice
Department General Inspector Michael Horowitz issued a memo on Monday where he was critical of the agent and the FBI's
tactics. The agent in question had urged the women to "not tell anyone, including their supervisors, about the UC
[undercover] operations," Horowitz said. Although the faces of the staffers were blurred and each was clothed, the
women never gave written release for the photos to be used in the operation. Questions of impropriety arose when the
agent was found not only to have made the request of one staffer, but that it was believed to be an application of leverage
spawning from an inappropriate relationship with the office staffer. Further investigation found that the request for
photos was not isolated to one staffer, nor was the agent alone in the practice of such maneuvers at the bureau.
Disband the FBI.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) continues its downward spiral into terminal corruption. Sadly, the scandals,
criminality and ethical abuses of the organization are largely ignored by the American public and by the institutions of
government charged with oversight and correction. Outrage after outrage is reported, hearings are held, Inspector
General reports are issued — but the systemic corruption is never really tackled and dirty cops skate away
virtually unscathed. This situation is constitutionally unacceptable, corrosive to public trust in law enforcement, and
a threat to the survival of the republic. In the past few days alone, we have learned that the October 2020 Michigan
governor kidnap plot was largely a creation of the FBI; a "senior FBI official" was on the take from media organizations; and
another assistant director was in a "romantic relationship with a subordinate" and involved in "other misconduct." The
leadership failures documented by the Office of the Inspector General are now almost standard and part of a tiresome media
drip-torture for the public to endure. Meanwhile, the FBI had the audacity to issue a Stasi-like tweet urging
"monitoring of 'family members and peers' for extremism." Remember: what we learn about the FBI in the press are
only the stories that are SO outrageous that the FBI cannot keep a lid on them and is forced to make disclosures via a
toothless Inspector General report — but never anything that results in a criminal indictment.
Grassley
presses FBI to explain its monitoring of conservative women's group. Sen. Charles E. Grassley is pressing
the FBI to explain the reasoning for its newly revealed probe into the conservative group Concerned Women for America, The
Washington Times has learned. The FBI's review of the pro-life women's organization has prompted an outcry from the
group's leadership and others concerned about law enforcement and intelligence community surveillance of Americans. The
FBI determined in July 2016 that there was nothing to investigate regarding Concerned Women for America after a "charity
assessment" for potential "embezzlement of non-profit organizations/corporate fraud," according to a document that the FBI
revealed in response to a Freedom of Information Act request from the Cato Institute.
The
FBI is made of snitches, often trapping Americans into committing crimes. Leading up to the events of 9/11,
there was probably no federal agency with a higher public stature than the FBI: [...] But today, after two decades of
failure, embarrassment, mendacity, favoritism, political partisanship, incompetent leadership and exasperating sanctimony
about a "higher loyalty," the Bureau's moral reputation lies in tatters. Whether it was former Director James Comey
sanctimoniously dithering in public over Hillary Clinton's emails in 2016, to former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe's
misleading of investigators about his role in leaking confidential memos to the news media, to the illicit lovebirds Peter
Strzok and Lisa Page cooing about an "insurance policy" against a Trump victory that year, the FBI has destroyed its
squeaky-clean public image. But wait — there's worse. It's become an organization of snitches and
spies, borderline entrapping the angry and the weak-minded into committing crimes. Nearly a decade ago, New York Times'
David K. Shipler listed a series of would-be terrorist plots thwarted by the FBI — only to find that the vast
majority of them were facilitated by agents and informers posing as terrorists themselves. They even chauffeured some
of the suspects to the would-be crime scenes themselves, only to foil the "plot" at the last minute.
Rep.
Jordan Asks IG Horowitz for More Evidence on FBI Official's Alleged Misconduct. Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio)
sent a letter to Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz on July 21 regarding the alleged misconduct of an
unnamed former senior FBI official. Jordan, in his letter, asks for Horowitz to explain to the House Judiciary
committee "the extent of this serious misconduct, and evaluate the FBI's handling of the matter." "To allow the
committee to better understand the OIG's findings, determine the extent of his serious misconduct, and evaluate the FBI's
handling of the matter, I ask that you please provide the complete unredacted case file of investigative Summary 21-096, to
include all documents, communications, and other evidence related to the report," he wrote.
Julie
Kelly: FBI Unleashing 'Terror Campaign' Across The Country. [Video clip]
FBI
accused of running 'fake tip line' during Brett Kavanaugh background check. Seven Senate Judiciary Committee
Democrats demanded the FBI explain its use of a novel tip line implemented during a supplemental background investigation
into then-Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh in 2018. In a Tuesday letter to Director Chris Wray, Democratic senators
accused the FBI of being "politically constrained by the Trump White House," demanding to know what extent the agency vetted
tips and whether the administration prevented it from doing so. The letter was written by Sens. Dick Durbin,
Patrick Leahy, Chris Coons, Cory Booker, Mazie Hirono, Sheldon Whitehouse, and Richard Blumenthal. The accusation comes
in response to a June 30 letter from Jill Tyson, assistant director for the FBI's Office of Congressional Affairs, addressed
to Whitehouse and Coons detailing the agency's supplemental background investigation into sexual assault allegations levied
against Kavanaugh after he was nominated by former President Donald Trump to serve on the Supreme Court.
Rep.
Jordan Asks IG Horowitz for More Evidence on FBI Official's Alleged Misconduct. Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio)
sent a letter to Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz on July 21 regarding the alleged misconduct of an
unnamed former senior FBI official. Jordan, in his letter, asks for Horowitz to explain to the House Judiciary
committee "the extent of this serious misconduct, and evaluate the FBI's handling of the matter." "To allow the
committee to better understand the OIG's findings, determine the extent of his serious misconduct, and evaluate the FBI's
handling of the matter, I ask that you please provide the complete unredacted case file of investigative Summary 21-096, to
include all documents, communications, and other evidence related to the report," he wrote.
Suspected
FBI Leaker Could Evade Consequences. A senior FBI official found guilty of misconduct for accepting
unauthorized gifts from journalists, including tickets to pricy black-tie dinners, in 2016 could evade consequences because
the official resigned before the investigation was completed, the Department of Justice inspector general said Tuesday
[7/20/2021]. The misconduct finding is part of a years-long Justice Department inspector general investigation into
FBI media leaks during the 2016 election. In 2018, the inspector general's office said it was probing "numerous FBI
employees, at all levels of the organization and with no official reason to be in contact with the media, who were
nevertheless in frequent contact with reporters."
Judge
dismisses "frivolous" defamation lawsuit against FBI informant in Trump-Russia case. A federal judge has
dismissed a lawsuit against Trump-Russia FBI spy Stefan Halper, while also sanctioning plaintiff Svetlana Lokhova and her
attorney for "their continuing to bring frivolous litigation against Halper." The final ruling, filed July 9 in
Virginia by U.S. District Court Judge Leonie M. Brinkema, came in the second of two lawsuits filed by Ms. Lokhova.
She is a Russia-born, British citizen-scholar wrongly linked by press reports in 2017-18 to some type of inappropriate
contact with retired Army Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn. Her first lawsuit, brought by lawyer Steven S. Biss,
alleged defamation by Mr. Halper and news media outlets. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th District agreed
with Judge Brinkema's 2020 decision and dismissed the case. The judges ruled that some news stories were beyond the
one-year statute of limitations, and others did not rise to defamation or prove that Mr. Halper was the reporters' source.
The Rank
Shame of the FBI's Rank and File. The FBI's rank and file recently banged down the door of a Florida pastor and
his son. Neither were accused of violent crimes, but the rank and file arrested both of them, taking the pastor's son
into custody in front of his three-year-old daughter. The rank and file terrorized a Lakeland, Florida community by
shouting through loudspeakers and using flashbang devices in its pre-dawn raid on the home of three January 6 suspects.
The rank and file arrested a 69-year-old California woman accused of taking photos in the Capitol building for 30 minutes,
after members of the rank and file questioned her without an attorney present. She thought she was helping the rank and
file catch the "real" bad guys, only to learn that the rank and file had targeted her as the bad guy for her half-hour of
photography. These types of boorish, melodramatic arrests of by-and-large ordinary Americans have been carried out by
the rank and file for more than six months. The manner of the arrests themselves is clearly punitive, meant to send a
clear message: the federal government is powerful, and if you are deemed its enemy, you will feel its wrath. [...] No members
of the rank and file FBI, as far as we know, have acknowledged the immorality of what they are being ordered to do —
terrorize and embarrass the political opponents of their own bosses. Not one member of the rank and file FBI has said to
himself, "This just isn't right," and turned in his badge and gun in protest.
Senior
FBI official took free gifts from media while Trump-Russia probe was underway, watchdog says. The Office of
Inspector General for the Department of Justice released the findings Tuesday [7/20/2021] of an investigation that found a
former senior FBI official violated agency policy by having numerous unauthorized contacts with the media. The
investigation found that the official, who has not been named and has since retired from the agency, "had numerous contacts
with members of the media between January and November 2016 in violation of FBI policy," as well as accepted unauthorized
gifts from media members, according to the report. The senior official had unofficial contact with media officials
during the opening months of the Trump-Russia investigation. That investigation by the FBI started in the months
leading up to and after the Nov. 2016 presidential election. However, the report does not mention that this
official was part of the investigation. Investigators found that the official had accepted tickets from members of
the media for two black-tie dinner events, one costing $225 and the other costing $300.
Inspector
General Outlines More Gross FBI Misconduct With Senior Officials and Media Collusion. In 2018 the Department of
Justice Office of Inspector General (DOJ-OIG) highlighted numerous FBI officials who accepted bribes from multiple media
outlets including: "tickets to sporting events", "golf outings", "drinks and meals" as well as exclusive invitations and
admission to "nonpublic social events". Today [7/20/2021] the OIG expanded on the investigation that stemmed from that
original outline, and published new findings. Within the latest two page summary, the "senior FBI official" is unnamed;
however, prior research indicates it was former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe. [Document] It is very
frustrating to see that nothing is done to hold these corrupt FBI officials to account for such gross abuses of power and
position. The dual system of justice in the United States is creating a very serious collapse in credibility for
multiple institutions of government.
Are
There Any Good Apples. With the latest revelation of massive FBI incompetence/corruption — turns out
the G-men ended up not just screwing up the gymnastics pervert case but lying about it under oath — you have to
wonder something. We keep getting told that the rank-and-file are A-OK, that it's just a few bad apples up on the top
floor who are framing people, botching investigations, not stopping mass killers, urging intrafamilial narcing, and busting
LEGO insurrectionists. Fine, great, dandy. So, where are all the good apples? Who quit in protest?
Who resigned and went public? Who said "No?" [...] Your oath or your pension is the choice, and the pension seems to
prevails almost every single time.
FBI:
Narc on Your Loved Ones to Battle 'Homegrown Violent Extremism'. [T]he federal government has gotten even
creepier ever since Joe Biden was installed as acting president. There's a lust for federal control on the Left that's
grown immeasurably, especially since January 20, 2021. It had been getting out of hand all during the pandemic last
year. We've witnessed the uncomfortable spectacle of almost half the country willingly ceding their freedoms and
celebrating government control of their lives. [...] It's beyond unnerving that the FBI thinks it's perfectly normal to
encourage Americans to behave like oppressed masses who lived behind the Iron Curtain during the Cold War. This isn't
just an example of the FBI's social media people being tone-deaf, the document it references says the same thing. The
rot within the Bureau was bad when Trump was in office, which means it will only get worse with this commie clown show of an
administration.
The
FBI Further Proves It's an Irredeemable Dumpster Fire of Corruption. Perhaps no organization over the last
half-decade has seen its credibility falter more than the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The once-storied agency,
having ostensibly overcome its history of corruption, was exposed for having done anything but during the Donald Trump
era. From its illegitimate use of garbage intelligence (the Steele Dossier) to initiate an investigation of the Trump
campaign to its lies to garner a FISA warrant targeting Carter Page, there appeared to be no limits to how politicized the
FBI was willing to become. That culminated in the current FBI Director's stonewalling of record requests and the DOJ's
refusal to charge anyone who had clearly broken the law from inside the bureau. Of course, we can't forget the
near-constant selective leaks, always targeting one side. Well, that trend continues. Earlier this week,
bombshell revelations dropped that FBI agents had lied in order to cover up a botched investigation against pedophile Larry
Nassar, who reportedly targeted at least 70 women between the time the FBI was alerted to his activities and his arrest
by Michigan law enforcement via another investigation.
The
FBI Further Proves It's an Irredeemable Dumpster Fire of Corruption. Perhaps no organization over the last
half-decade has seen its credibility falter more than the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The once-storied agency,
having ostensibly overcome its history of corruption, was exposed for having done anything but during the Donald Trump
era. From its illegitimate use of garbage intelligence (the Steele Dossier) to initiate an investigation of the Trump
campaign to its lies to garner a FISA warrant targeting Carter Page, there appeared to be no limits to how politicized the
FBI was willing to become. That culminated in the current FBI Director's stonewalling of record requests and the DOJ's
refusal to charge anyone who had clearly broken the law from inside the bureau. Of course, we can't forget the
near-constant selective leaks, always targeting one side. Well, that trend continues.
Hotel
Maid Prevents Potential 'Las Vegas Style' Mass Shooting Ahead of All-Star Game — FBI Says No Link to
Terrorism. A Denver hotel maid prevented a potential 'Vegas style' mass shooting ahead the MLB All-Star game
over the weekend. The maid discovered more than a dozen weapons, a thousand rounds of ammo and body armor in a room at
the Maven Hotel near Coors Field. According to Denver police, authorities confiscated narcotics, 16 firearms, ammo and
body armor from two hotel rooms that had balconies overlooking downtown Denver. Three men and one woman were arrested
and being held on suspicion of weapons charges and possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, according
to Denver police.
More about the
still-unexplained Las Vegas shooting in October 2017.
FBI
Wants Family Members To Snitch On Each Other To Prevent 'Homegrown Extremism'. The FBI issued an ominous tweet
on Sunday which encourages "family members and peers" to "learn how to spot suspicious behaviors and report them to the FBI"
in the name of national security. The broadly-worded tweet[,] from the same agency that confiscated an unassembled Lego
model of the US Capitol as evidence against a Jan. 6 protester[,] suggests that family members are "often best
positioned to witness signs of mobilization to violence." For example, your radicalized Antifa nephew is being
encouraged tell the FBI that you might be a domestic terror threat because you own guns and told the family at Thanksgiving
you don't like illegal immigration.
FBI
Urges Americans To Monitor 'Family Members And Peers' To 'Prevent Homegrown Violent Extremism'. The FBI took to
Twitter Sunday [7/11/2021] to encourage families to watch out for "homegrown violent extremism." "Family members and
peers are often best positioned to witness signs of mobilization to violence. Help prevent homegrown violent
extremism," the FBI's tweet read in part. Family members and peers are often best positioned to witness signs of
mobilization to violence. Help prevent homegrown violent extremism. Visit [link] to learn how to spot suspicious
behaviors and report them to the #FBI. [...]" [Tweet] The link included in the tweet takes readers to the 2019 edition
of the Homegrown Violent Extremism Mobilization Indicators report. The report separates extremism into three groups
based on whether the action is highly, moderately, or minimally diagnostic on its own.
The Editor says...
The difference between this and SWATting is that in this case the government is initiating the process.
No,
the FBI did not seize a 'fully constructed Lego set' from a Jan 6 rioter. It has been revealed that a report by
The Daily Beast regarding a "fully assembled" Lego model of the Capitol, found in the possession of a suspect charged
in connection to the riot Jan. 6, was fake news. Last week, social media lit up after The Daily Beast published
a "scoop" revealing that a man arrested for his involvement in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot had a "fully assembled" Lego set of
the US Capitol in his home. The story was widely mocked by political commentators and keyboard pundits asking if the
FBI was going to investigate other Lego sets in people's homes, everything from Hogwarts to the Death Star. It turns
out the reporting was erroneous, as the man only had the unopened box set.
The Editor says...
Whether the Lego model was assembled or unassembled is immaterial. The FBI has had to stoop to the level of confiscating toys
to prove that a skeptic of the November 2020 election is a domestic terrorist. If a Lego set is introduced as evidence, the jury
should erupt in derisive laughter and throw the case out.
FBI
Seizes "Fully Constructed" Lego Model of U.S. Capitol at Home of Alleged January 6th Rioter. The FBI has
reportedly found a "fully constructed" Lego brand toy model of the U.S. Capitol in the home of one of the alleged January 6th
rioters. The media is treating this story as very, very serious. We live in such dumb times. [...] American citizens
have been held in solitary confinement without bail or trial for months, and this is what we're talking about.
It's like we're living in an episode of the Twilight Zone.
FBI
seized 'fully constructed' US Capitol Lego set from home of alleged rioter. The FBI seized a "fully
constructed" Lego set of the U.S. Capitol from the home of an alleged insurrectionist. Prosecutors detailed the finding
in a court document for Robert Morss, who was arrested on June 11 at his home in Glenshaw, Pa. The government argued
that Morss should be detained from court pending trial. According to the court filing dated July 2, law enforcement
recovered clothing and other items from Morss's home that match what he carried on Jan. 6. Among the items were a "'Don't
Tread on Me' flag, a neck gaiter, a military utility bag, a black tourniquet, and military fatigues." In addition,
"law enforcement also recovered a fully constructed U.S. Capitol Lego set," prosecutors wrote. It's unclear why Morss
had the Lego set. The Pittsburg Post-Gazette previously reported that Morss was a substitute social studies teacher.
Update:
DOJ
Retracts Claim of 'Fully Constructed' Capitol LEGO Set; LEGO of Riot Suspect 'in a Box'. The Department of
Justice (DOJ) has withdrawn its claim that a Capitol riot suspect was found to be in possession of a "fully constructed" LEGO
set depicting the U.S. Capitol; the LEGO set was still contained in a box, the DOJ said Friday [7/9/2021].

Lego
Figures Charged With Insurrection. As news that one of the dangerous January 6 insurrectionists had a Lego
White House taken from his home as evidence, further news has leaked that the FBI will likely charge many of his Lego
mini-figures with weapons and conspiracy charges.An unknown number of mini-figures was taken into custody. At least
four were reportedly cooperating with law enforcement and may have been long-time FBI informants.
Defund the FBI. Nearly six months after the
events of January 6, the FBI, under the direction of Joe Biden's vengeful Justice Department, is accelerating the nationwide
manhunt for anyone involved. Since June 23, agents have arrested 17 people from Florida to California. Charges
range from assaulting police officers and criminal trespassing to something called "destruction of property in special
maritime and territorial jurisdiction and aiding and abetting." The dragnet is part of the nonstop campaign of terror
unleashed by the Biden regime against the political Right. Attorney General Merrick Garland, who compares
January 6 to the Oklahoma City bombing and Capitol protesters to terrorists, pledged the "Capitol breach" probe would be
his top priority. Garland last week bragged in a press release that his department reached the "benchmark" of arresting
500 people and warned he would "hold all January 6 perpetrators accountable" for their actions that day. His
prosecutors routinely ask the courts to keep the accused behind bars awaiting trials that won't start until late this year or
perhaps even 2022; dozens have been held for months in a D.C. jail that specifically houses January 6 defendants.
FBI Director Christopher Wray, despite assurances his agency treats all protesters the same regardless of partisan
affiliation (LOL), is happy to assist Garland in his mission. Wray insists "domestic violent extremists" —
code for Trump supporters — pose the greatest security threat to the country.
FBI
Fabrication Against Assange Falls Apart. On the final day of the Assange extradition hearing, magistrate
Vanessa Baraitser refused to accept an affidavit from Assange's solicitor Gareth Peirce, on the grounds it was out of
time. The affidavit explained that the defense had been unable to respond to the new accusations in the United States
government's second superseding indictment, because these wholly new matters had been sprung on them just six weeks before
the hearing resumed on Sept. 8, 2020. The defense had not only to gather evidence from Iceland, but had virtually no
access to Assange to take his evidence and instructions, as he was effectively in solitary confinement in Belmarsh. The
defense had requested an adjournment to give them time to address the new accusations, but this adjournment had been refused
by Baraitser. She now refused to accept Gareth Peirce's affidavit setting out these facts.
FBI
raids 69-year-old man's home after he attends Trump rally, neighbors tipped off authorities. Joseph Bolanos
says he didn't riot at the Capitol. He wasn't even on the streets at the time, having retreated to a hotel room as the
incursion had happened. He said he turned over evidence to the FBI that proves this[.] But the FBI still raided
his and his mother's apartments. He's had two strokes since. He's said he's been ostracized by his community,
where he was a respected member. All because an anonymous caller reportedly told the FBI he was bragging about having
entered the Capitol — which he has the evidence to prove he didn't do. According to a Wednesday [6/23/2021]
piece by New York Post columnist Miranda Devine, Bolanos is the president of his Upper West Side block association, a
position he's held for almost a quarter-century.
What
The FBI Did to a Pillar of His Community After the Capitol Riot Is Shameful. Joseph Bolanos, 69, was
well-respected in his community, always coming to the aid of others. As the president of his local block association in
New York City, he has always looked out for his neighbors, particularly over this past year during the pandemic doing things
to raise morale. He even became a Red Cross volunteer after 9/11, and he also once saved a woman when someone tried to
mug her. On top of all that, he takes care of his elderly mother, who is 94. But, the FBI blew up his life and
almost destroyed him over the past few months. His crime? Attending President Donald Trump's rally on Jan. 6 with
a friend, even though he never went into the Capitol building. He dropped in on the rally and then went back to his
hotel. He was there at his hotel, with time stamps on pictures to prove it, he says, during the breach at the
Capitol. He did go back to the Capitol later, filming from the outside, but the riot was over by that point.
Black Extremist 'Shoots Daytona Cop
In The Head' As DOJ, FBI Stay Laser-Focused On Jan 6 Protesters And 'White Extremists'. A black extremist who
recently marched through the streets of Louisville, Tulsa and Stone Mountain armed with an AK-47 together with the militant
black nationalist "Not F···ing Around Coalition" stands accused of shooting a Daytona Beach police
officer in the head on Wednesday night [6/23/2021].
Affidavits
Raise More Questions About FBI's Role in Trump Probe. Affidavits filed in a federal court on June 21 raise
crucial questions about the FBI's role in the 2016 Hillary Clinton presidential campaign's efforts to vilify her opponent,
Donald Trump, as a Russian agent. The FBI obtained a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant to spy on the
Trump team based on a dossier of memos alleging Trump's ties to Russia that was filed by Clinton campaign contractor
Christopher Steele. But the newly released court documents suggest the FBI may have helped shape the anti-Trump plot at
its origins. The affidavits are the latest revelation to come from the ongoing defamation suit that the owners of
Alfa-Bank, Russia's largest commercial bank, have brought against Fusion GPS, the communications firm that hired Steele to
compile Trump — Russia reports on behalf of the Clinton campaign. In one of Steele's memos, Alfa-Bank
principals Mikhail Fridman, Petr Aven, and German Khan are alleged to have engaged in corrupt practices.
Feds
accused of seizing $85 million from safe deposit boxes without 'any legal basis'. Hundreds of people storing
valuables in safe deposit boxes in Los Angeles may never see their cash, precious metals and heirlooms again, unless a
federal judge intervenes in the next week. Several are suing the government for seizing the contents of about 800 boxes
as part of a March raid of the storage provider, U.S. Private Vaults (USPV), which was indicted for conspiracy to sell drugs
and launder money. The Institute for Justice (IJ) is seeking class-action status for a May lawsuit by several owners
alleging "shocking, unconscionable, and unconstitutional" behavior by the government. IJ attorney Robert Frommer
accused the feds of an "$85 million cash grab" from people who were not accused of wrongdoing.
Affidavit:
FBI feared Pennsylvania would seize fabled gold. An FBI agent applied for a federal warrant in 2018 to seize a
cache of gold that he said had been "stolen during the Civil War" while en route to the U.S. Mint in Philadelphia, and was
"now concealed in an underground cave" in northwestern Pennsylvania. That's according to court documents unsealed
Thursday [6/24/2021]. The FBI had long refused to confirm why exactly it went digging on state-owned land in Elk County
in March 2018. After meeting with the treasure hunters in early 2018, the FBI brought in a contractor with more sophisticated
instruments. The contractor detected an underground mass that weighed up to nine tons and had the density of gold,
the affidavit said. The FBI said in the newly released court documents that it feared the state of Pennsylvania would claim
the gold for itself, setting up a costly legal battle. That amount of gold would be worth hundreds of millions of
dollars. Federal authorities say the dig came up empty. But the father-son duo who brought a small army of federal
agents to the site remain convinced the FBI uncovered something there — and their lawyer is still pressing the case,
successfully suing for access to government emails about the dig.
When the FBI Framed
Four Innocent Men. [Scroll down] Eventually, the surviving men and their families, along with the
families of the deceased Greco and Tameleo, filed suit against the FBI. Not only did the FBI refuse to admit the
truth — that these men were innocent — but the FBI also obstructed their civil rights trial. It
turned out that the FBI had been hiding evidence from their own lawyers. This caused Judge Gertner to order that "this
matter be brought to the personal attention of the Director of the FBI [Robert Mueller]." After a bench trial, Judge
Gertner concluded this case was "about intentional misconduct, subornation of perjury, conspiracy, the framing of four
innocent men." She awarded the men and their families over $100 million in damages.
Recent
History Suggests FBI Involvement in January 6. [Scroll down] If the past is prologue, there's no reason
to consider the FBI's involvement a "conspiracy theory" rather than a solid likelihood. How many times have we been
down this road over the past five years — assured that claims about the FBI's malfeasance and abuse were
"conspiracy theories" only later to learn they were true? We were told the FBI did not use spies to infiltrate the
Trump campaign. They did. We were told the FBI didn't ambush and frame former National Security Advisor Mike
Flynn. They did. We were told the FBI would not mislead the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. They
did. We were told the FBI wouldn't doctor official reports or correspondence. They did. We were told the
FBI would never use a sketchy Russian national to bolster the collusion case against Trump. They did. Sadly, the
FBI is one of the least trustworthy agencies in the federal government — and that's saying a lot. The stench
of Jim Comey's deceitful reign has irrevocably tarnished the reputation of the FBI for tens of millions of Americans.
The similarities between Russiagate and the Capitol "attack" are becoming increasingly clear. The initial narrative
about what happened that day has steadily crumbled over the past five months.
It's
Beginning to Look Like Enemy Action. Dong Jingwei is a Chinese defector working with the Defense Intelligence
Agency (DIA). He served as Vice Minister of State Security in the Chinese Ministry of Defense. Before defecting,
he was responsible for the counterintelligence efforts in China. He was in a position to know about all things
"espionage" in China and is perhaps the highest-level Chinese defector the U.S. has ever had. Even though the legacy
media is playing it down, this is a big deal. It speaks volumes that the man who knows the identity of all the Chinese
spies in our country chose to defect to the DIA and only the DIA. Further, it's reported that the DIA is not sharing the
information it's receiving with the FBI or CIA. Now why would that be?
NSA
Agrees to Release Records on FBI's Improper Spying on 16,000 Americans. The National Security Agency (NSA) has
agreed to release records on the FBI's improper spying on thousands of Americans, the secretive agency disclosed in a recent
letter. The agreement may signal a rift between the NSA and the FBI, according to attorney Ty Clevenger.
Clevenger last year filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request on behalf of The Transparency Project, a Texas
nonprofit, seeking information on the FBI's improper searches of intelligence databases for information on 16,000
Americans. The searches violated rules governing how to use the U.S. government's foreign intelligence information
trove, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, an Obama nominee who currently presides over the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance
Court, wrote in a 2019 memorandum and order that was declassified last year.
How
Do We Regain Trust in the FBI? A Pew Research study released last month demonstrated a sharp decline in trust
in the government from a high of seventy-seven percent in 1964 to a low that has remained under twenty-five percent since
2007. If three-quarters of Americans have spent the last fourteen years distrusting the government at large, what does
that say about the agencies entrusted with justice and public safety? [...] The parallel between the FBI and the NKVD is not
a straight line — at least, not yet. At the same time, looking at the chronology of when Americans
suddenly lost faith in their government (2007), an eerie set of circumstances predate the decline in trust. The first
development that hastened the consolidation of power and authority in federal agencies like the FBI was the Patriot Act of
2001. It paved the way for expanded police powers in the name of public safety.
Tucker
Carlson Outlines The Primary Threat to Our Nation, The Corrupt Intelligence Apparatus Which Includes The FBI.
Tucker Carlson did an extensive monologue and interview last night as a review of the January 6th DC protest contrast against
the likelihood of FBI organization and coordination. Many are calling this a brave discussion because Carlson will
likely face backlash for the overview. As CTH has noted often, the politicization of the U.S. intelligence apparatus is
the biggest threat to our constitutional republic. In this segment Carlson arrives at the same conclusion.
Carlson used a Revolver article by Darren Beattie as the framework for the discussion. The additional examples Carlson
uses are familiar to CTH readers as we have used them before to highlight how politically corrupt the FBI has become.
Never
Ever "Cooperate" With a Federal Law Enforcement Agent. I have said it before and I will say it again. You
never, ever "cooperate" (talk) to any Federal or state law enforcement agent, period. You also do not cooperate with
any but benign and obvious local police requests, on the order of kids breaking into cars in the driveways of your
neighborhood. You may think you are being a good citizen and, maybe, their questions are legitimate and for a worthy
purpose. Maybe. But you do not know that. That professional agent may be a good, patriotic American doing
noble work, like catching Chinese spies. Maybe. But you do not know that. I have been involved in two
extremely serious "investigations" at the Federal level. I had done nothing at all wrong but one was politically driven
(from the White House) and one was driven by ambitious bureaucrats. In the first instance I got (expensive) legal help
before I hanged myself. If I had not, I would have lost my job at the very least. In the second my wife and I
were being set up for a totally false obstruction of justice charge.
Tucker
Carlson Outlines The Primary Threat to Our Nation, The Corrupt Intelligence Apparatus Which Includes The FBI.
In the bigger picture anyone with intellectual honesty would admit it is impossible for Antifa to exist if the DOJ and FBI
were functioning as a healthy part of the national law enforcement system. A few dozen arrests for transparently
obvious violence, combined with a few RICO cases against the financial systems that support Antifa and the entire violent
group essentially disappears. Therefore, it is worth just accepting the obvious: The DOJ and FBI are part of the
support structure that allows political violence to exist. I would personally take it (confidently) a step further and
say: Antifa simply could not exist without the explicit support of the DOJ/FBI.
Colonial
Pipeline attack: How did the FBI recover the ransom money? The FBI claimed it recovered millions of
dollars in Bitcoin paid as ransom during the attack against the Colonial Pipeline — a feat that is now generating
more questions than answers. The Justice Department and the FBI announced Monday [6/7/2021] it had seized 63.7 bitcoins
(worth about $2.3 million at the time) from a Bitcoin wallet thought to be controlled by cybercriminals tied to a
Russia-based collective called DarkSide, which operates off a "ransom as service" model. Recovery of the cryptocurrency
ransom from its presumably savvy holders, especially in such a short time, left many experts stunned. While many
details about the operation to recover the funds remain unclear, perhaps the biggest mystery, and the one that has so many
people scratching their heads, is how the FBI managed to get the "private key" used to unlock and pull assets from the
criminals' specific Bitcoin address.
The
Colonial Pipeline Hack, The 'Russians', & The FBI's Ransom-Grab - What Really Happened? Speculation has been
running rampant over today's FBI press conference revealing the recovery of most of the ransom paid to "Russian" hackers by
Colonial Pipeline. [...] In order for the computers that maintained the pipeline to get back to full operation, Colonial
agreed to pay a ransom in the form of 75 bitcoin, which was worth about $5 million at the time. Now, here's where
things get weird: In their triumphant statements this morning, the DOJ claimed to have seized the funds from the group
that reportedly paid DarkSide for their Ransomware as a Service (RaaS) attack on Colonial. Notably, they did not secure
the funds from DarkSide, which took a fee from the ransom in bitcoin that remains in the possession of the shadowy operation.
[...] The DOJ has historically been extremely hostile to bitcoin, labeling it as a preferred monetary system for cyber
criminals, despite bitcoin transactions being publicly available to anyone with access to the internet.
FBI built fake phone company in global wiretapping
operation of historic proportions. The United States Federal Bureau of Investigation built a fake telephone
service provider for a secret worldwide operation that officials described on Monday as "a watershed moment" in law
enforcement history. The operation, known as TROJAN SHIELD, began in 2018 and involved over 9,000 law enforcement
officers in 18 countries around the world. When the existence of TROJAN SHIELD was announced in a series of official
news conferences yesterday, officials said the operation had "given law enforcement a window into a level of criminality
[that has never been] seen before on this scale". The operation centered on the creation of an entirely fake telephone
service provider, known as ANØM. The fake firm advertised cell phones that were specially engineered to provide
peer-to-peer encryption, thus supposedly making it impossible for government authorities to decipher intercepted messages or
telephone calls between users.
USA
Today fights FBI subpoena for readers' data from report on shooting that killed two agents. USA Today is
fighting an FBI demand for information related to readers who accessed a report on the newspaper's website earlier this year
about a shooting in which two agents were killed during a search at a Florida apartment. The FBI made the request via
subpoena to USA Today's owner, Gannett, in April. The agency sought information including the IP addresses and
mobile identification information of people who accessed the Feb. 2 article about the agents during a 35-minute window.
After Gannett objected to disclosing the subpoenaed records, the FBI confirmed on May 25 it had received the response, and
the company moved to quash the subpoena as unconstitutional, according to a May 28 court filing in the U.S. District Court
for the District of Columbia.
'Slimy'
FBI bigwig sexually harassed his juniors, drank on the job. A "slimy" and "creepy" high-ranking FBI agent
groped three of his female subordinates, made inappropriate sexual comments in the workplace and regularly drank on the job,
according to documents obtained by The [New York] Post. The unidentified G-man, who worked as a supervisory assistant
special agent in charge, was investigated by the Department of Justice Inspector General's Office, which substantiated three
allegations of unwanted sexual touching and the illegal boozing, according to the documents, which were obtained through a
Freedom of Information Act request. Details about when and where the conduct took place were redacted, but the records
show the allegations were investigated by the New York Field Office and the probe was completed on Dec. 7, 2020.
GOP
Senator Ron Johnson Says He Was "Set Up" by FBI Agents to Stop Him From Talking about Crackhead Hunter Biden.
Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) joined Dan Bongino on the Dan Bongino Show on Friday [5/28/2021]. During their discussion,
Senator Johnson said he was "set up" by FBI-Stasi agents to stop him from talking about Hunter Biden and his filthy perverted lifestyle.
The
FBI Seized Heirlooms, Coins, and Cash From Hundreds of Safe Deposit Boxes in Beverly Hills, Despite Knowing 'Some' Belonged
to 'Honest Citizens'. Dagny discovered that the FBI had seized the contents of her safe deposit
box — about $100,000 in gold and silver coins, some family heirlooms like a diamond necklace inherited from her
late grandmother, and an engagement ring she'd promised to pass down to her daughter — almost by accident.
She'd been asked by a friend to recommend a convenient and secure location for keeping some valuables. Dagny searched
Yelp to find the phone number for U.S. Private Vaults, a Beverly Hills facility where she'd rented a safe deposit box since
2017. That's when she saw the bad news. "Permanently closed." After a brief moment of panic, some phone calls,
and several days, Dagny and her husband Howard (pseudonyms used at their request to maintain privacy during ongoing legal
proceedings) figured out what happened. On March 22, the FBI had raided U.S. Private Vaults. The federal agents
were armed with a warrant allowing them to seize property belonging to the company as part of a criminal investigation —
and even though the warrant explicitly exempted the safe deposit boxes in the company's vaults, they were taken too.
More than 800 were seized.
Former
FBI Director Freeh gave $100k to a trust for VP Biden's grandkids in 2016 while exploring 'future work
options'. Take it from the New York Times and Washington Post: nothing to see here, move along.
Definitely not a bribe. Emails recovered from Hunter Biden's abandoned laptop reveal that while Joe Biden was vice
president, a trust for his grandchildren — the children of his late son Beau Biden — received a hundred
thousand dollars from a foundation controlled by former FBI Director Louis Freeh, who was a lawyer for 3 corrupt foreign
businessmen, later convicted and imprisoned. In the emails it is revealed that Freeh actually met with the sitting VP
in 2016 "to explore with him some future work options," in addition to courting his son Hunter for collaboration.
Former
FBI director Louis Freeh gave $100,000 to a private trust for Joe Biden's grandchildren. Former FBI director
Louis Freeh gave $100,000 to a private trust for Joe Biden's grandchildren and met with the then-Vice President in 2016 'to
explore with him some future work options', emails reveal. Freeh also spoke with then-Vice President Biden in 2016 'to
explore with him some future work options', according to the bombshell communications[.] The emails suggest Freeh was
trying to establish a future business relationship with Biden — and the White House has failed to disclose to
DailyMail.com whether Joe Biden discussed private business with Freeh while in office.
Dr.
Strawman, Or How I Learned To Stop Loving The FBI And Start Worrying. [Scroll down] Don't take my word
for it. If you search for Antifa at the FBI's website, you get one result! Now check out the MOST
WANTED/CAPITOL VIOLENCE page header. It goes on endlessly. Page after page of images captured of anyone in the
Capitol on January 6th. FBI Director Wray insists that the FBI did not use geotracking to locate anyone to the right of
Mao who was in the Capitol that day. Having worked in Telecom for twenty years, and having been involved in the
incorporation of the Enhanced 911 Systems that allow police to use cell towers and GPS to track emergency cellphone calls to
their exact location, I know Wray is lying. How else did he get the information in any legal fashion? I can stand
politicians lying to me. I've witnessed that my entire life. But for the Director of the FBI to lie to the
American people in such a low fashion, one more characteristic of John Brennan and James Clapper is a bridge too far.
Add to that the embarrassing raid on Marylin Hueper in Alaska based on a selfie. That's not an investigation unless
they have evidence I don't know about. It was a politically motivated botch that completely disrupted the lives of two
innocent Americans. Conversely, DoJ and the FBI seem determined to whitewash, equivocate, and dismiss any concerns about
Antifa and BLM, whose members have caused over two billion dollars in damage and destroyed countless businesses and lives.
FBI
quietly admits 2017 GOP baseball shooting was domestic terrorism after all. The FBI quietly admitted Friday
that the 2017 Alexandria, Virginia, baseball field shooting that nearly killed Rep. Steve Scalise has been classified as
"domestic terrorism" carried out by a "domestic violent extremist" targeting Republicans after the bureau previously
classified it as "suicide by cop." The revelation appears in the middle of an appendix on page 35 of a 40-page FBI-DHS
report released on Friday titled "Security Strategic Intelligence Assessment and Data on Domestic Terrorism." In a section
describing approximately 85 different "FBI-Designated Significant Domestic Terrorism Incidents in the United States from 2015
through 2019," the Alexandria baseball field shooting appears, with the FBI categorizing the perpetrator as a "Domestic
Violent Extremist" and describing the incident thusly: "An individual with a personalized violent ideology targeted and
shot Republican members of Congress at a baseball field and wounded five people. The subject died as a result of
engagement with law enforcement."
Gas
Lines Return as Woke Deep State Fails to Stop Cyber Attack. Welcome to Jimmy Carter 2.0, to an America saddled
with a failed president and a failed Deep State whose minions worry about everything except what actually matters. The
[...] FBI and the [...] CIA have one [...] job, and that's to protect our way of life. Period. And the fastest
way to unravel our way of life — the most effective, deadly, and destructive way — is to interrupt the
free flow of oil. Therefore, outside of physical threats to American persons and property, the FBI and the CIA should
be focused almost exclusively on ensuring the energy that keeps our way of life alive is not interrupted. Well, once
again, these feckless Deep Staters have failed. Instead of being focused on stopping a VERY successful cyber-attack on
a crucial oil pipeline, these useless idiots have been focused on using the correct pronouns.
Former
police chief: If we lose the rule of law, we are going to lose America — and we're just about
there. [Scroll down] And what of the once-proud FBI? Over the past five years, we have seen that
agency, which always enjoyed a stellar reputation, get reduced to nothing but a political hit squad for the Democratic
Party. Look no further than the hit job done by the FBI on former Trump National Security Adviser Michael Flynn if you
don't think the FBI has become a political enforcement arm for Democrats. Add to that the involvement of the FBI in
trying to take down former President Trump before he was even elected, and that agency has lost any and all credibility it
had. Sadly, there are a lot of outstanding, dedicated agents that work for that agency. However, the agency
as a whole, primarily in leadership has become a pathetic joke.
The
Full FBI Warrant Which Allowed Officers To Raid An Alaska Spa To Recover Nancy Pelosi's Laptop. The full
warrant, detailing how a dozen FBI officers ended up raiding a spa in Alaska under false pretenses, has been released.
The story first came to major national attention after The National Pulse interviewed Paul and Marilyn Hueper, whose home and
business was raided last week in an apparent case of mistaken identity. The 38 page document, below, reveals how poor a
job the FBI did in identifying a woman they say was in Speaker Pelosi's office on the afternoon of January 6th, 2021.
In summary, the warrant appears to rely on Marilyn Hueper wearing a black coat and having brunette hair as the motivations to
raid the Homer Inn and Spa in search of an HP ProBook 640 G5 i5 laptop amongst other items.
Unequal protection under the law.
The FBI and the Department of Justice cannot be trusted to administer equal justice under the law. Their actions over the last five years include:
• Operation Crossfire Hurricane investigating and hobbling President Trump on the basis of flawed intelligence paid for and manufactured by Hillary Clinton and the Democrats;
• Lying to and abusing the FISA courts to spy on Americans who supported President Trump;
• The prosecution of General Flynn and assorted Republicans who were associated with President Trump;
• The protection and non-prosecution of Hillary Clinton and her associates, Susan Rice, Hunter Biden, and the Biden crime family;
• Continuing orchestrated and illegal leaks to the media designed to damage President Trump and his supporters and bolster Democrats;
• Failure to prosecute Antifa and Black Lives Matter for a summer of riots and arson;
• Choosing to throw the prosecutorial book at the January 6 "white supremacist" "insurrectionists"
• Identifying "white supremacists" as the number one domestic terror threat when Islamic Jihadists, Antifa, and Black Lives Matter are greater threats by any rational metric;
• The recent 6 AM raid on Rudy Giuliani to obtain the electronic devices in his possession, including protected communications with his client, former President Trump, but not including the hard drives of Hunter Biden[.]
The Democratic Party's
Stasi. While reading emails in his bedroom last Wednesday morning, Paul Hueper heard a loud commotion inside
his house. Still clad in pajamas, the Alaska business owner ran to his dining room to see what was happening.
Hueper found himself face-to-face with several armed FBI agents, guns drawn, barking orders to him and his wife,
Marilyn. The agents had kicked down the front door of their home in Homer, Alaska where they also operate a day spa and
inn. The pair were quickly handcuffed along with a few houseguests, including a teenager. Paul and Marilyn, who
had attended Donald Trump's speech in Washington, D.C. on January 6 and then walked to the Capitol, were interrogated for at
least three hours by federal investigators. [...] Marilyn was told she was a suspect in the case of House Speaker Nancy
Pelosi's "stolen" laptop; a few hours into the inquisition, an agent finally showed Marilyn a photo of someone inside the
Capitol on January 6 who looked like her. She told agents it wasn't her and insisted the image had been
photoshopped. The whole incident was somewhat amusing to the Huepers. "We laughed a lot of the time because it
was so ridiculous," Marilyn said. "I could hear Paul laughing in the other room." But it was far from a laughing
matter. One investigator warned Marilyn that if she didn't give the answers they were looking for, she could face
perjury and obstruction of justice charges.
House
Republicans Demand Answers from FBI on FISA Abuse Revelations. House Republicans have called on FBI Director
Christopher Wray to provide a "detailed accounting" of every instance since 2019 that the agency has used warrantless
surveillance authority to obtain information unrelated to national security, while accusing the FBI of "illegal spying
activities." Reps. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.), in a joint letter to Wray, cited a 67-page
opinion from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC), which they said shows the FBI has been "seriously and
systematically abusing its warrantless electronic surveillance authority" by overstepping the limitations under section 702
of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). Section 702 allows the attorney general and the director of national
intelligence to jointly authorize warrantless surveillance of non-U.S. citizens residing outside the United States, subject to
certain constraints. These include requiring investigators to adopt "targeting procedures" to make sure the information
obtained under Section 702 warrantless surveillance is indeed limited to noncitizens and to prevent the "intentional
acquisition" of communications within the United States. Section 702 also requires a FISA court order for a
review of query results in criminal investigations that aren't related to national security.
Andrew
Giuliani to Newsmax TV: Raid on Father 'Goes Right to the Top'. The FBI raid on former President Donald Trump
attorney Rudy Giuliani goes "right to the top of the White House," featuring a president going after the lawyer of his
"political adversary," according to Andrew Giuliani on Newsmax TV. "When Joe Biden says, 'I didn't know about it,' I
don't buy that," Andrew Giuliani told Monday's "Greg Kelly Reports." "I'm sorry, Greg. This is the same guy who
plagiarized. This is the same guy who's continually lied to the American people. "He may be president of the
United States, and I certainly respect the presidency, but I do not respect his word." The son of Rudy Giuliani noted
the entire Hunter Biden laptop controversy is "motive" for President Joe Biden to send his Justice Department on his
"political adversary."
The Deep State is Back.
ecently, the FBI searched Rudy Giuliani's Manhattan apartment. The search was made in connection with the prosecution
of two Ukrainian Americans for violations of the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA). Giuliani is a respected lawyer,
a former federal prosecutor, and was mayor of New York during the 9/11 attacks. FARA prosecutions are rare and
typically are dealt with through fines. The use of search warrants against a lawyer is also unusual, and the Department
of Justice handbook counsels the use of some lesser means, such as subpoenas, to obtain information when possible. In
his dealings with Ukraine, Giuliani says he acted as President Trump's emissary and lawyer. These "minister without
portfolio" employments have been used before, particularly where, as in Ukraine, American government officials may themselves
be corrupt, compromised, or resistant to the president's agenda.
The
Never-ending Hunt for a Trump Crime. Was this an off-the-book operation by rogue agents? I mean, if these
people feel free to constantly leak to the press sensitive material, how far off the reservation have FBI agents gone?
Or was this shoved under the carpet as a national security matter and the DNI was responsible and kept Barr in the
dark? A mystery of significant importance. Did they have a FISA warrant to do this? If so, ever more reason
to scrap this monstrosity. If you are not yet concerned about the FBI's counterintelligence operations, its
incompetency and KGB-type operations, you just aren't paying attention.
Giuliani:
FBI Agents Refused To Take Hunter Biden's Hard Drives. During an interview with Fox News' Tucker Carlson on
Thursday [4/29/2021], former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani said that FBI agents who came to his home with a search
warrant for "electronics" refused to take Hunter Biden's hard drives, even though they fell "within the scope of the
subpoena." "Well, about six o'clock in the morning, there was a big bang! bang! bang! on the door and outside were seven
FBI agents with a warrant for electronics," Giuliani began. "And I looked at the warrant and I said, 'This is
extraordinary because I offered to give these to the government and talk it over with them for two years.'"
The
Real Reasons Behind the Rudy Giuliani Raid. Expectations that the FBI was investigating possible crimes
documented on Hunter Biden's laptop were laid to rest earlier this week when agents raided the home and office of Rudolph
Giuliani, the man who made news of the laptop public. According to reports, federal investigators are looking for
evidence that the former Mayor of New York City violated the foreign agents registration act (FARA) by illegally lobbying on
behalf of Ukrainian officials. But that's just a pretext to search his communications and records to find something
with which to take revenge against a man who helped uncover the corruption of America's first family. The compromising
photos, emails, and texts found on Hunter's laptop include accounts of financial arrangements with a Chinese businessman he
called the "spy chief of China." The documents, confirmed by a former Biden associate, implicate other members of the Biden
clan, including it seems the president. And so to hunt Giuliani, the commander-in-chief has deployed federal law
enforcement authorities, which have their own reason to retaliate against one of the Department of Justice's most famous
former prosecutors. Giuliani helped thwart the FBI and DOJ's plot to topple an American president.
Giuliani
says FBI agents declined to take Hunter Biden's hard drives. Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani during an
interview on Thursday said that FBI agents who searched his home this week declined to take Hunter Biden's hard drives.
Giuliani said that seven FBI agents showed up early Wednesday morning with a warrant for electronics. He said when he
asked them if they wanted to take Hunter Biden's hard drives, they declined. "Hunter Biden's hard drives fall within
the scope of the subpoena. The subpoena required them to take all electronics, but they decided to leave that
behind. And they also were completely content to rely on my word that these were Hunter Biden's hard drives," the
former mayor told conservative commentator Tucker Carlson during an interview on the Fox News Channel.
New
York Times, WaPo, NBC forced to retract false claims about Giuliani. The New York Times, Washington Post and
NBC News all issued retractions Saturday [5/1/2021] for their coverage of Rudy Giuliani following a raid of his Manhattan apartment by
the FBI. The Times appended their correction to a story about the role Giuliani may have played in the 2019 recall of
ambassador Marie L. Yovanovitch and whether he received a warning from the FBI about Russian disinformation. "An
earlier version of this article misstated whether Rudolph W. Giuliani received a formal warning from the F.B.I. about Russian
disinformation. Mr. Giuliani did not receive such a so-called defensive briefing," The Times wrote Saturday in a
note attached to the piece. The Washington Post's correction, on a story about prominent Americans being targeted by
Russian disinformation, was similar.
FBI
spied on Giuliani, Trump iCloud chats during impeachment hearings, says lawyer. Rudolph W. Giuliani says that
the FBI secretly spied on his Apple iCloud account beginning in late 2019 when he was having regular messaging conversations
with his client, President Trump, during House impeachment proceedings. Mr. Giuliani said the U.S. Attorney's
Office in Manhattan on Thursday informed his attorney, Robert Costello, that covert wiretapping took place. "He asked
[the prosecutor] to repeat it because he couldn't believe it was true," Mr. Giuliani said this week on the "Rita Cosby
Show" on WABC radio in New York. "To me they just trashed the president of the United States."
Washington
DC Is Paying $1.6 Million In Settlements To Rioters At Trump's Inauguration. The double standard of justice
continues. Washington D.C. is going to pay $1.6 million in settlements to those who were arrested for rioting at
Trump's inauguration. According to lawsuits filed protesters were arrested without cause and excessive force was used.
[...] Trump supporters who were at the capitol on January 6th are not getting the same treatment. While they do nothing
about the crimes committed by the deep state and radical left they are targeting every Trump supporter. The FBI is now
focusing in on a Grandmother who just walked through the U.S. Capitol!
FBI
raid on innocent couple shows lawlessness at Department of Justice. Wednesday's rogue FBI raid on an innocent
couple in Homer is an example of what happens when a lawless and completely illegitimate political party and administration
come to power. The Democrats are utilizing the proven techniques of communism and fascism, and weaponizing federal law
enforcement for political purposes. They are now reaping the fruits of the November's fake election. Its
aftermath spells the end of freedom in America. It is no longer a threat. It is here, and none of us are
safe. Paul and Marilyn Hueper went to DC on Jan. 6 to listen to Donald Trump's speech. Like other Alaskans, they
were at the very foot of the stage and in front of a million people in the Washington Mall, but when they were dismissed by
Trump to "Peacefully and patriotically protest", they suddenly found themselves at the back of a very long line. They
got lost, they bought a hot dog, they started up the steps, but they never got within a hundred yards of entering the capitol building.
Feds
serve search warrant at Alaska resort: 'We're here for Nancy Pelosi's laptop'. Federal agents served a search
warrant at a boutique resort in Homer, Alaska, saying they were looking for a laptop stolen from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's
office during the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol, one of the Homer Inn and Spa owners said.
FBI
breaks into Homer, Alaska house, looking for Nancy Pelosi's laptop. A couple in Homer, Alaska reports the FBI
raided their home on Wednesday morning looking for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's laptop. Twelve agents, FBI, Capitol
Police, and other apparent police agents, broke down the door to their home and told Marilyn and Paul Hueper to put their
hands up. Paul counted seven guns trained on him when he came out of the bedroom. The agents cuffed the couple
and held them for hours. It was a case of mistaken identity, but the FBI now has possession of Marilyn's HP Probook
laptop. The photo above [not shown here] is on the FBI website as a person of interest in the January 6 surge into
the U.S. Capitol, during which Pelosi's laptop was stolen. The photo above is of the woman the FBI is looking for.
Marilyn has no real social media presence or photos online.
Giuliani
claims materials seized by FBI are 'exculpatory' evidence. Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani said
Thursday he "never ever represented any foreign national" after the FBI raided his apartment and seized his electronic
devices earlier this week. Giuliani, who served as former President Donald Trump's personal attorney, has reportedly
been eyed by federal authorities over whether he illegally lobbied the previous administration in 2019 on behalf of Ukrainian
officials and oligarchs while searching for damaging information on Trump's political rivals, including President Joe Biden,
then the leading candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination. He told Fox News host Tucker Carlson on Thursday
that seven FBI agents knocked on his door at 6 a.m. on Wednesday serving a warrant for electronics, adding he told federal
agents: "This is extraordinary because I've offered to give these to the government and talk it over them for two years."
"I could have destroyed the evidence years ago," Giuliani said, but he claimed that he didn't because the evidence is "exculpatory"
and proves himself, Trump, and "all of us are innocent."
Rudy
Giuliani responds to FBI search warrant raid and goes on the offensive. The highly publicized early morning
raid on the apartment and office of Rudy Giuliani, the personal lawyer of the 45th President of the United States, was an
outrage. Thanks to a 10+ minute interview last night on Tucker Carlson Tonight, the nation's highest-rated cable
news program, we have a better grasp of the dimensions of the scandalous behavior of the Department of Justice.
[Video clip] I urge readers to view the entire interview if they did not see it on the broadcast. It is
embedded below. Keep in mind that before he was Mayor of New York, he was the United States Attorney for the Southern
District of New York, the very office that is now conducting the investigation targeting him. He therefore knows the
ins and outs of all aspects of federal prosecution, including the execution of search warrants.
The
dark night of fascism has finally landed in the United States. On Wednesday [4/28/2021], Federal agents flashing
open-ended warrants conducted a 6 a.m. raid on former New York mayor current Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani to seize his
electronics. The ostensible reason was that Giuliani violated a law requiring Americans who represent foreign nationals
to register as foreign agents. This is a law that is enforced only against Republicans close to Trump — and
Giuliani is adamant that he's never represented foreign nationals. The agents ostentatiously refused to seize copies of
Hunter Biden's hard drives, which Giuliani possessed, even though they were obvious electronic devices. Giuliani
contends that the hard drives' contents establish not only that Hunter and Joe Biden acted as unregistered foreign agents,
but also that Joe Biden and his family took millions in bribes over the years and that Hunter Biden was engaged in child
pornography. Since Giuliani still has the hard drives, perhaps he should make all the information on the drives public.
[...] On the evidence available, what's happening to Giuliani looks like typical fascism: an incoming regime uses
unequally applied law and a complete absence of due process to purge all political opposition.
The raid on Rudy.
Never mind that Biden was, himself, guilty of quid pro quo, having said openly that he would withhold money from the
Ukrainian government unless the investigation of Burisma was halted. So, though complaints against Giuliani and company
had been lodged by Democrats many months ago, it took a Biden presidency to see to it that Rudy was humiliated by an FBI
"home invasion" reminiscent of the harrowing one launched against another elderly Trump associate, Roger Stone. In that
early morning raid covered by tipped-off CNN, Roger and his frail wife feared for their safety. It would seem that the
Federal Bureau of Investigation is capable — or willing — to thwart only old conservative men.
They haven't bothered to breach the walls of the sprawling Clinton compound in Chappaqua for incriminating evidence in the
matter of the faux dossier by Christopher Steele, financed by the DNC with funds from Hillary's campaign. Nor have they
bothered to bust into the fashionable Los Angeles digs of Hunter Biden, perhaps rummaging through his steel straws and
various "extraneous" laptops to find evidence of his sweetheart deals with the wife of a Moscow mayor and a lending
institution in China.
Declassified FISA
Opinion Shows More FBI Abuses. A FISA Court opinion and order declassified today reveals continued FBI abuses
of "raw FISA-acquired information." After a DOJ National Security Division review, the FISA Court noted "the FBI's failure to
properly apply its querying standard when searching Section 702-acquired information was more pervasive than was previously
believed." This opinion includes these findings: April 2019 - July 2019: An FBI technical information specialist
was involved in "Compliance incidents" by conducting 124 queries of Section 702-acquired information on (1) Volunteers who
had requested to participate in the FBI's "Citizens Academy"; (2) Persons who needed to enter the field office to perform
repairs; and (3) Persons who reported they were victims of a crime.
FISA
court doc shows FBI looked for domestic terrorists without warrants, report. The FBI has without court orders
looked through troves of National Security Agency foreign communications for information on American "racially motivated
violent extremists," according to a news report based on a recently declassified report. The agency conducted the
reviews despite being warned several years ago by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which approves warrants for
such investigations, that such inquiries were constitutionally alarming, according to the Daily Beast. The FBI's
warrant-free queries, known as backdoor searches, were related to criminal investigations including those on "domestic
terrorism involving racially motivated violent extremists."
The Editor says...
Why limit the search to those who are racially motivated? Aren't other motivations just as dangerous? Terrorists
motived by Islam, for example. Antifa terrorists motivated by anti-capitalism. Eco-terrorists motivated by
militant environmentalism. In general, violence and hate speech come from the left.
Capitol
Rally Attendee Says FBI Interviewed Her About Jan. 6 Tweets; Were Embarrassed About Having to Investigate 'Stupid'
Tips. A media influencer who attended the Trump rally in Washington DC on January 6, says two FBI agents came
to her home to investigate a couple of tweets she posted on that day. In one tweet, she had joked that she was
"storming the Capitol." In the other tweet she had apparently responded a troll. Dr. Karlyn Borysenko said she was
out of town at the time, and the agents spoke with her husband. When she got back, she said that she arranged to have
an attorney present with her for the FBI interview, which she found out would be about her experience at the Capitol on
January 6. The FBI agents, she said, were apologetic, and told her that they were having to investigate a lot of
tips from people that "seem stupid."
FBI
turn to high-tech facial recognition, undercover operations to nab Capitol invaders. The number of U.S. Capitol
invaders charged with crimes has topped 400, Justice Department records show, and in a recent case the FBI disclosed new
twists in identifying and ensnaring a suspect. A Washington Times review of scores of law enforcement affidavits
justifying an arrest show this pattern: Agents examine thousands of videos and photos taken inside the Capitol on Jan. 6.
In old-school detective work, officers pick out a target and compare Capitol images to online posts from that day or
previous days based on tips from the invaders' friends, co-workers and even family. To seal the deal, FBI agents openly
approach the suspect in a phone call or home visit. The targets in many cases readily admit to their actions. It
is difficult to deny wronging when caught on camera.
FBI
Labels 2017 Baseball Field Shooting by Deranged Leftist that Nearly Killed GOP Rep. Scalise a "Suicide by
Cop". The FBI is a total disgrace. The FBI labeled the 2017 baseball field shooting that nearly killed
GOP Rep. Steve Scalise a "suicide by cop" — this was recently revealed during an exchange with a GOP
lawmaker. GOP Rep Steve Scalise, the House Majority Whip, and two Capitol Police were shot during baseball practice in
June of 2017. Scalise was shot in the hip and tried to drag himself off the field after he was shot. The shooter,
James Hodgkinson, was a Bernie supporter and Russian collusion truther who was radicalized by the Democrat-media complex
because of their lies about Trump and the GOP. Rather than labeling the shooting of Republicans by a left-wing Bernie
supporter "domestic terrorism," the FBI labeled it a "suicide by cop."
Representative
Markwayne Mullin Confronts FBI Director Christopher Wray About Difference Between Prosecuting Capitol Hill Protestors vs
BLM/ANTIFA Violence. Rep. Markwayne Mullin took his opportunity to question FBI Director Cristopher Wray
by asking the FBI Director about the double standard in investigating/prosecuting Capitol rioters vs the Black Lives Matter
and Antifa rioters in DC and Portland. Rep Mullin smartly uses the example of federal officers who have been attacked,
assaulted and injured by Antifa and BLM, yet the FBI does nothing to investigate or prosecute these violent extremists.
Mullin even quoted Wray back to himself when the FBI Director said: "Antifa is not a national organization", a quote
Director Wray now stunningly denies.
FBI
Director Wray Refuses To Disclose If Antifa Has Organized Finances To Launch Coordinated Attacks. Federal
Bureau of Investigation Director Christopher Wray refused to disclose whether Antifa has the capability to organize, receive
funding, and coordinate attacks during the House Intelligence Committee's annual public World Wide Threats Hearing on
Thursday [4/15/2021]. Wray began his answer about Antifa by declaring it is a "real thing." "There are certainly
local and regional nodes, individuals who self-identify with Antifa and commit violent attacks, citing that as their
motivation, and we have a number of predicate investigations into such individuals and Antifa is a real thing. It's not
a fiction," Wray admitted, despite Democrats and their media allies previously calling Antifa a "myth." When pressed by
Republican Rep. Michael Turner of Ohio about the organizing, training, and financing of Antifa, however, Wray was
reluctant to divulge information.
FBI
says it interviewed FedEx mass shooter last year. FBI agents last year interviewed the gunman who fatally shot
eight people at a FedEx facility in Indianapolis, the bureau said Friday, as investigators searched the home of the
19-year-old former FedEx employee. Coroners began the slow process of identifying the victims as family members spent
hours agonizing over word of their loved ones. The slayings Thursday night marked the latest in a string of recent mass
shootings to rock the U.S.
GOP
House member grills Wray on double standard of Capitol and Portland rioter prosecutions. Rep. Markwayne
Mullin took aim at FBI Director Cristopher Wray during a House Select Committee on Intelligence hearing, questioning what he
sees as the FBI's double standard in prosecuting Capitol rioters and those in Portland. "Under the Biden
administration, there appears to be a wave of leniency being granted to individuals arrested for federal crimes in Portland,"
Mullin, a Republican from Oklahoma, said during the hearing. "Federal prosecutors are apparently approving deferred
resolution agreements in a number of cases and allowing perpetrators to do community service and avoid jail time and criminal
records. Why are we seeing such a disparity between the individuals charged on Jan. 6 and those that are charged in
Portland?" Wray at first responded by pinning the blame on local prosecutors, noting that the FBI only investigates the
crimes but does not make decisions about prosecution.
The
FBI might have gone ahead and fixed your Microsoft email server. Not updating your critical software? The
FBI might just do it for you. The FBI has begun quietly accessing hundreds of American computers hacked through
Microsoft's Exchange email program, removing malicious code that the hackers left behind. The operation, which the
Department of Justice announced Tuesday [4/13/2021] it had authorized with a warrant, highlights the severity of the Exchange
vulnerability, which allowed scores of hackers to break into organizations since the beginning of the year. But it also
raises concerns about the FBI's jurisdiction when remedying cyberattacks against Americans.
'Skilled
predator' allowed to retire from FBI with no punishment and full benefits after Justice Department substantiates 8 sexual
harassment claims: report. James Hendricks quietly retired last year as a special agent in charge, but not
before colleagues labeled him a "skilled predator" and the Justice Department's internal watchdog found that his behavior
marked one of the FBI's most egregious known cases of sexual misconduct. According to the Associated Press, Hendricks
was among several senior FBI officials who avoided discipline — and retired with full benefits — even
after claims of sexual misconduct against them were substantiated. Hendricks' alleged sexual harassment was outlined in
a 52-page report obtained by the AP under the Freedom of Information Act . Although his name is blacked out in the report, he
was identified by law enforcement officials familiar with his case, the AP reported.
The
FBI / DOJ is MIA on Hunter Biden, Seth Rich, Anthony Weiner laptops. The FBI and DOJ have been missing in
action for years. Failing in disclosing and acting on the information in the Hunter Biden, Seth Rich, and Anthony
Weiner laptops. The two-tiered system of American justice has never been more hypocritical on display. Democrats
and the deep state lie, cover-up and protect the likes of Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Hunter Biden, and the Biden crime
family. Yet the full weight and power of the government are brought against any Republican connected to Donald
Trump. The story of the Hunter Biden, Seth Rich, and Anthony Weiner laptops is a tale of just how debased and corrupt
our Government institutions and modern media have become.
FBI's
political jihad against American white whales. When it all began, the FBI just had "a couple of questions."
Because John is a law-abiding, pro-cop kind of patriotic American citizen, he willingly answered their questions. No,
he told them, he was not at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6. He was, he told them, at work. He provided the proof that
he was at work to their field office in Rockville. All of this was as if there is something inherently nefarious or
illegal about a political gathering of citizens at the United States Capitol to petition their federal government. The
FBI agents produced no evidence that John had committed any crime, caused any disturbance or trespassed against anyone.
"I supported President Trump in the 2020 election," John told me. "I put up signs in my yard, but I have never been
involved in any kind of rioting or vandalism." But the FBI questions did not end with his whereabouts on Jan. 6.
That was only the beginning. In the weeks since they first banged on the door of his home, agents have continued pestering
him, demanding answers and threatening him.
The
FBI is very good at woke politics, not so good at catching killers. After the horrendous Colorado shooting last
week, we learned that the alleged shooter, Ahmad Al Aliwi Alissa, had a record of violence and arrests. His brother
described him as mentally ill, paranoid and "very anti-social." He was also on the FBI's radar because of someone with whom
he associated. In this, Alissa joins a long list of "known-wolf" killers, including Nidal Hasan, the Fort Hood shooter;
the Tsarnaev brothers, who conducted the Boston Marathon bombing; Omar Mateen, the Pulse nightclub shooter in Florida; and
some of the 9/11 hijackers. The FBI's failure to catch that last set of perpetrators is especially enraging —
and shows the agency has been atrophying for a long time. "For two and a half weeks before the attacks," as Slate noted,
"the US government knew the names of two hijackers. It knew they were al-Qaeda killers and that they were already in the
United States."
The
Matt Gaetz Leak Makes the FBI Look Really Stupid and Corrupt. Last night, amidst a slew of far more important
stories, The New York Times sought to change the narrative from the disaster at the border by leaking about a supposed
investigation involving Rep. Matt Gaetz. The report was based on anonymous sources giving very vague information
about what might or might not be going on. RedState covered this initially last night, and if Gaetz actually did
something wrong, he should be held accountable. [...] For his part, Gaetz denies the claims. He went on Tucker
Carlson's show last night and named a person he alleges is trying to extort him. Later, RedState confirmed that Gaetz
was telling the truth about his father wearing a wire for the FBI to investigate the matter. Where that leaves us is
anyone's guess. Gaetz is certainly a character, and his defense is a bit convoluted, but the fact that this was leaked
via "three people briefed" is yet another black-eye for the FBI.
FBI
Raids Home of Young Female Christian Volunteer at 4 AM in Texas — For Walking Through US Capitol in January with
Her Boyfriend. We received this information last week. And now the story is making national news.
Young female Christian volunteer Elizabeth Rose Williams was arrested last Tuesday by the FBI. As of this writing, her
family has not heard from her. Elizabeth was scooped up by FBI agents in an early morning raid at her home in Ingram,
Texas. The FBI waited until 4-6 AM to raid this Christian woman's home.
An
FBI so corrupt it lets mass shooters rampage needs to go. The New York Times reported on March 27 that
Syrian-born Colorado mass shooter Ahmad Al Aliwi Alissa had been on the FBI's radar before he murdered 10 people in a grocery
store. "The suspect's identity was previously known to the F.B.I. because he was linked to another individual under
investigation by the bureau, according to law enforcement officials," the Times says. [...] It seems the FBI is not very good
at this "stopping mass shooters" thing. This is not an anomaly in the FBI's history. It in fact appears to be a
pattern of negligence. During the Barack Obama presidency, Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., grilled FBI Director James Comey
about the "known wolf" problem — of 14 Islamist attacks in the U.S. during Obama's tenure, the FBI had been aware
of at least 12 before the violence erupted, and did nothing. For example, the 2009 Fort Hood shooter, who killed 13;
the Boston Marathon bombers of 2013 who killed three and injured 264; and the Pulse nightclub shooter who killed 49 people
and wounded 53 more. All were known to the FBI and several had been interviewed by the FBI before they went on killing
sprees. The FBI had also been warned numerous times about the Parkland, Florida school shooter, before he killed 17 and
injured 17 more in 2018. It also knew beforehand about the 2018 Nashville, Tennessee Waffle House shooter, who killed
four and injured two more, and the 2020 Nashville RV bomber.
Meet
the Russiagate Prober Who Couldn't Verify Anything in the Steele Dossier Yet Said Nothing for Years. For the
past four years, Democrats and the Washington media have suspended disbelief about the Steele dossier's credibility by
arguing that some Russia allegations against Donald Trump and his advisers have been corroborated and therefore the most
explosive charges may also be true. But recently declassified secret testimony by the FBI official in charge of
corroborating the dossier blows up that narrative. The top analyst assigned to the FBI's Russia "collusion" case,
codenamed Crossfire Hurricane, admitted under oath that neither he nor his team of half a dozen intelligence analysts could
confirm any of the allegations in the dossier — including ones the FBI nonetheless included in several warrant
applications as evidence to establish legal grounds to electronically monitor a former Trump adviser for almost a year.
FBI Supervisory Intelligence Analyst Brian Auten made the admission under questioning by staff investigators for the Senate
Judiciary Committee during closed-door testimony in October.
Colorado,
the Rocky Mountain Shooting Gallery. Another mass shooting occurred this past week in Colorado, a state that
had more than its share of similar shootings over the past few decades. [...] [The shooter] was already known to the FBI,
"linked to another individual under investigation by the bureau" according to the New York Times. Yet this happened
under the FBI's noses. Perhaps they were busy with other important cases. Like the 50 plus agents investigating
Trump-Russia collusion, spying on the Trump campaign and administration. Or the dozen plus agents sent urgently to
investigate a NASCAR garage door handle with a loop that someone thought might resemble a noose. As The Last Refuge
points out, this is yet another of many potential terrorism-related mass shootings where the shooter is known to the FBI, yet
they did nothing to prevent the shooting. If only the shooter were a garage door handle, then the FBI might have
investigated seriously and might have actually preempted the mass casualty event.
So
the FBI knew all about the Colorado shooter.... What, exactly, are the taxpayers paying for in the highly
politicized and loaded-for-money wokester FBI these days? The recent mass-shooting out of Colorado, from a
murder-spewing freak they knew about, would suggest nothing. While they were out there busy looking for 'white
supremacists' this admitted refugee from Syria was making plans to kill. And he's not the first. [...] The prevalence
of spray-shooters ought to leave the FBI no time for political persecutions that benefit only Democrats. They need
focus now on real threats and be on the hot seat if they don't.
FBI
Knew Boulder, Colorado, Suspect Identity Prior to Shooting. A reminder: 50 FBI agents were enlisted within
the Trump-Russia investigation to push a narrative. 13 FBI agents were dispatched to Talladega speedway to investigate a
garage pull-down rope and push a narrative. Thousands of FBI hours have been spent investigating the January 6th
Washington DC protest, and once again another terrorist carries out a mass shooting where the FBI knew the suspect in
advance. The FBI knew in advance the Pulse Nightclub shooter (Omar Mateen) and were tipped off by the local
sheriff. The FBI knew in advance the San Bernardino Terrorists (Tashfeen Malik). The FBI knew in advance the
Boston Marathon Bombers (the Tsarnaev brothers) tipped off by Russians. The FBI knew in advance the Garland, Texas,
shooters (Elton Simpson and Nadir Soofi). The FBI knew in advance of the Parkland High School shooter (Nikolas Cruz).
The FBI knew in advance of the Fort Hood shooter (Nidal Hasan); and now the FBI knew in advance of Ahmad al-Aliwi Alissa.
[...] Meanwhile the political FBI agents chase the ghosts of mysteriously invisible white supremacists conducting random acts
of unidentified racism.
Report:
Boulder Mass Shooting Suspect 'Previously Known to FBI'. Ahmad Al Aliwi Alissa, 21, the suspected gunman in a
mass shooting in Boulder, Colorado, on Monday, was reportedly previously known to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
because of his ties to another person under investigation. The New York Times reported Tuesday evening [3/23/2021]:
"The suspect's identity was previously known to the F.B.I. because he was linked to another individual under investigation
by the bureau, according to law enforcement officials."
Senator
Accuses FBI Of Running 'Fake' Brett Kavanaugh Background Check. U.S. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-Rhode
Island) sent a letter to newly-sworn in U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland asking for his support to investigate the
Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) background check of U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh before he
was confirmed. Whitehouse told Garland in the letter that he thought the FBI's investigation into allegations of
misconduct by Kavanaugh was "fake" and compromised by partisan politics, CBS News reported. "It cannot and should not
be the policy of the FBI to not follow up on serious allegations of misconduct during background check investigations,"
Whitehouse wrote.
FBI
Uses SWAT Tactical Team, Armored Vehicles and Armed Troops to Arrest Man Who Attended January 6 Capitol Hill
Protest. Just as the FBI used a heavily armed tactical SWAT team to arrest Roger Stone, the FBI deployed the
same tactics in Naples, Florida to arrest a man who attended the January 6th DC protest march. Military tactics,
armored vehicles, automatic rifles and a no-knock raid. Essentially the FBI continues to send a message to the larger
electorate. They use these aggressive tactics against people based on their politics. There are no honorable
"rank and file" in the modern FBI; the entire institution is compromised. This stuff is nuts.
Will
FBI 'Chats' Send Conservatives to Prison? Across the nation, FBI agents are swooping down upon conservative
activists, Trump supporters, and anyone suspected of any tie to the January 6 clash at the Capitol. Conservative author
Candace Owens tweeted on March 3: "About 10 of my friends who attended Trump's speech but DID NOT go to Capitol building
thereafter have had the FBI turn up at their door to ask them why they went to D.C. ... Our FBI is trying to scare conservatives
against ever gathering in the future." Actually, the potential problem is far worse for people targeted by the feds.
FBI chief Christopher Wray, who is scrambling to deliver the indictments that will please his congressional overlords, says the
agency is conducting 2,000 domestic terrorism investigations. Few Americans recognize how badly the legal playing field is
tilted against them. When FBI agents knock on their doors, many Americans won't hesitate to open up because they assume
"those who have nothing to hide have nothing to fear." But along with Bureau procedures that are a travesty of due process,
the FBI is exploiting a sweeping law that criminalizes casual comments. Federal agents have the right to lie to you and to
put you in prison if you lie to them. Any citizen who makes even a single-word ("no" or "yes") false utterance to a federal
agent faces up to five years in prison and a $250,000 fine.
FBI
Sends in Armored Vehicle with Turret, 2 Vans, 6 FBI Vehicles, 3 Local Police Vehicles to Arrest Young Father Who Attended
Jan. 6 Rally. Joshua James was arrested this week and is being charged in connection to the violent events of
January 6th in Washington D.C. Joshua James is an Iraq War veteran. He was wounded in a bomb blast in Iraq.
And Joshua is being held by the FBI without bail. Joshua is the breadwinner in his family. He receives retirement
pay from the military. He has three young children including a 3-year-old. [...] The FBI lured him out of his home in
Alabama by pretending to be a customer needing a pressure washing. Then an Army armored vehicle with a turret on top, 2
FBI vans, 6 FBI vehicles, 3 local police and sheriff's vehicles pulled up and ransacked their home.
FBI's
Ridiculous "Capitol Siege Pipe Bomb" Video Is An All-Out Assault on Common Sense. This week, the FBI released
video footage of their key suspect in the vaunted "pipe bombs planted at DNC and GOP offices" plot from the MAGA Capitol
protests of 1/6. Much is riding on this "pipe bomb" plot being legit, because the "armed insurrection" narrative is
falling apart without it. Just last week, the FBI confessed to Congress — and not without prodding from
Senator Ron Johnson — that no guns had actually been recovered or confiscated on Capitol grounds. [...] With the
"Guns at Capitol" meme down, only two serious, terroristic plots implicating MAGA on 1/6 remain. One is the "guns &
bombs stashed in cars and outside the city" plots, principally related to the Oath Keepers, which has been the subject of an
exhaustive forthcoming Revolver News investigation; the other is this eagerly-hyped "pipe bomb" plot. So this "pipe
bomb" plot better be real, and it better be the authentic act of a genuine Trump supporter, or basically all they have left
is the strange case of the "Oath Keepers" — and we will tell you in advance that is not looking pretty for The
Narrative or the FBI.
Did
the FBI steal tons of Civil War gold? The tale starts in the 1860s when legend has it that a large wagon full
of gold bullion was either stolen or "went missing" in a remote area of western Pennsylvania. The shipment had
supposedly been on its way to the mint in Philadelphia but it never arrived. This has led any number of would-be
treasure hunters to scour the forests in that region looking for a massive payday. The amount of gold was rumored to be
between seven and nine tons, making it worth hundreds of millions of dollars today. But all efforts to locate it had
come up empty. That might have changed in 2018. A father and son team named Parada who co-own the treasure-hunting
outfit Finders Keepers were investigating a remote part of Elks County called Dent's Run. [...] Now, however, through FOIA
requests and court orders, the FBI has released at least some emails on the subject and it certainly sounds like they know
more about the story than they've been letting on.
The Editor says...
The FBI always knows more than it reveals. The lesson to be learned from this story — if it's true,
and it appears to be — is simple: You can't trust the FBI.
Democrats
renew calls to remove J. Edgar Hoover's name from FBI building. Rep. Steve Cohen vowed to renew the push
to remove former FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover's name from the bureau's downtown Washington headquarters, according to an
interview released Monday [3/8/2021]. Appearing on Yahoo! News' Skullduggery podcast, the Tennessee Democrat said
the effort is getting a fresh look after the release of a new movie highlighting the FBI's secret program to discredit civil
rights activists. The Washington Times in 2019 first reported Democrats' bid to strip the longtime FBI director's name
from the bureau's headquarters.
FBI
Took Possession of Suspicious Ballots in Georgia in Early January and Ordered Them Destroyed With a Shredder.
The Gateway Pundit reported on January 9th that the FBI in Georgia stepped in and shut down the forensic analysis of shredded
ballots, took the ballots away from the forensic team, and brought them back to the shredder to destroy the evidence.
Today we have more on this incident from two sources. This story was first reported by Patrick Byrne, the former CEO of
Overstock.com. He reported on Twitter that the Deep State was stealing evidence in Georgia related to the 2020
Election: [...] We now have more information regarding this incident from individuals with knowledge of the events.
This all started when a shredding company was hired to come in and shred election material. When the truck arrived at
the scene, the material asked to be shredded turned out to be ballots and other official records from the 2020
election. The company began shredding the material into little balls which are basically impossible to piece back
together once they are shredded in that manner.
Can We
Reform an FBI that Behaves Like a Gestapo? Short answer — I doubt it. But it is a legitimate
question to raise because there are still some patriots serving within the ranks of the FBI who are beyond distraught over
the gross politicization of their once proud, respected organization. Some of the men and women with 20 years in are
simply counting days and hours until they can punch out. There is genuine, deep seated hatred for Christopher Wray and
his coterie of lackeys eager to suckle on the teat of the Deep State. The final straw for many in the bureau is the
dishonest response to the January 6 swarm at the U.S. Capitol. For starters, the FBI had intelligence about Antifa's
plans to infiltrate the crowds of Trump supporters and incite violence. But the FBI also was manipulating some of the
very groups labeled as "white supremacists", e.g. the Proud Boys.
Twenty
days of infamy: the January 2017 red flags the FBI blew past on Russia collusion. From its earliest moments,
the FBI's Russia collusion probe was always fraught with warning signs. Agents were told Christopher Steele provided
faulty information, had likely been compromised by Russian intel disinformation, wanted to defeat Donald Trump, had leaked to
the media and was being paid by Hillary Clinton, who herself might be carrying out an epic dirty political trick to vilify
Trump with false information to distract from her own scandals. Those intelligence reports alone should have given
agents pause. The fact that Steele had been terminated by the FBI as an informant for leaking also should have weighed
heavily. But if ever there were red lights screaming for the FBI to end the counterintelligence probe, they were
flashing during a harrowing 20-day window in January 2017 as Barack Obama was leaving office and Trump was coming in.
Between Jan. 4, 2017 and Jan. 24, 2017, nearly every major assumption of the FBI's Russia collusion theory was gutted,
according to recently declassified evidence reviewed by Just the News.
FBI
criminal complaint on Capitol incursion used Photoshopped 4-chan hoax picture as evidence. Just when you
thought the FBI couldn't fall any further, the Bureau utterly, hilariously, and luridly beclowns itself. In a formal
document, a criminal charge. Using a Photoshopped picture from 4-chan, the reviled (by all people who abhor wrongthink)
website where a wag substituted a lurid picture for the official portrait hanging on the wall of the US Capitol in the
background of a shot of the Viking horn helmet guy and others who stormed in on January 6, 2021. [...] This is so sloppy a
job that it suggests extreme pressure to act in haste. That need for speed, of course, is the excuse used by Kevin
Clinesmith to explain away his lying to a federal court — and the judge in question, James Boasberg, bought it and
let him off with no prison time, a $100 fine and community service. I am so old that I remember when the FBI was adored
by the media and most of the citizenry other than communists. And J. Edgar Hoover's insistence on getting the details
right was legendary.
FBI
Used A Photo-Shopped Version Of A Photo From The Capitol Protest In Their Criminal Complaint. Brian P. McCreary
was arrested Thursday for being part of the mob that breached the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6. In a statement given
voluntarily to the FBI, McCreary said he was frustrated by the outcome of the presidential election and had traveled to
Washington, D.C., where he listened to former President Donald Trump urge his supporters to take their grievances to the
Capitol. And so he did, according to authorities, joining a march from the White House, at times scurrying along side
streets to get ahead of the growing crowd and arriving among the first rioters to reach and invade the Capitol
building. The 33-year-old Domino's Pizza employee is pictured inside the Capitol alongside the horn-headed QAnon Shaman
on January 6.
FBI Includes Unusual 4Chan
Photoshopped Image in Complaint Against Capitol Rioter. We've seen a lot of problems over the last few years
with the FBI. Former director James Comey turned it into a political mess that targeted President Donald Trump, even
using false information weaponized and paid for by the DNC and Hillary Clinton's team. You even had people lying and
changing emails to target a Trump adviser, Carter Page. Christopher Wray didn't solve the problems when he came
in. Now the FBI seems to be going all out to go after people who were in the Capitol on Jan. 6. As we reported
last night, federal authorities even seem to be getting the help of Bank of America to get the private information of
thousands, if not millions of people, who had nothing to do with it and were not allegedly involved in any way.
The
FBI's Campaign Against Some Rightwing Groups Looks Exactly Like J. Edgar Hoover's COINTELPRO Scandal. [Scroll
down] For the past four years, we've been appalled by the FBI and the Intelligence Community working hand-in-glove to
insert informers into a presidential campaign and transition team. We saw an obviously faked dossier laundered by the
CIA and FBI through press leaks to create the pretext for a special counsel. Over the past month, I've posted about the
alarming pattern of "militia" and "extremist" arrests with a common thread. A group meets. Someone in the group
brings up the bright idea to commit a federal felony. Discussion ensues. An outsider with the means to carry out
the felony is introduced to the group. Some inciting act is taken, like purchasing an illegal device, and the FBI
descends on the group. There is a press conference and indictments and much blathering about the enemy within and the
danger of extremists. [...] You have groups opposed in some fundamental way to the direction the elites want the nation to
go. They are targeted for no other reason than their dissent. From there, it is a short jump to creating facts
that enable law enforcement to suppress that dissent. [...] If federal law enforcement continues to push informants and
provocateurs into otherwise peaceful organizations and engage in what a layperson would characterize as entrapment, then they
build a case for having entire groups labeled as violent extremists. As we saw in the aftermath of the Capitol riot,
that kind of labeling can be used to prevent people from traveling (the 'no-fly" list). It can keep them from renting
housing (AirBNB canceling reservations). It can get financial institutions to make it impossible to use a credit card
or other payment system. And on and on.
Proud Boys
Leader Outed as Long Time FBI Snitch and He's the Tip of the Iceberg. On Friday [1/29/2021], the Justice
Department announced the indictment of two members of the "Proud Boys" stemming from their conversations before the riot at
the US Capitol on January 6. [...] I'm sort of amazed by the way Justice has set out to criminalize membership in this
organization by the amount of play they give to the logos and trying to portray the group as misogynistic and, possibly,
white supremacist. What is missing from this story is the extent to which the Proud Boys have been penetrated by the FBI.
'Lawyer
up, and get out': FBI first spurned Hunter Biden laptop, says Delaware tech repairman. John Paul Mac Isaac, the
Delaware computer shop owner who unwittingly came into possession of Hunter Biden's laptop, says an FBI agent initially gave
a stern warning to his family when first offered a copy of the explosive evidence about Joe Biden's son: "You better
lawyer up and get out of my office." In a wide-ranging interview Monday with Just the News, Isaac described what
concerned him most about the contents on the laptop, his extensive efforts to get authorities in law enforcement and Congress
to pay attention to it and his anger at the news media, Democrats and even security officials who initially accused him of
carrying out a Russian disinformation campaign or trying to make money off the discovery. U.S. intelligence has
determined the laptop contents — now in the hands of the FBI and Congress and part of a criminal tax
case — were not Russian disinformation. Isaac said he never took a dime for providing the materials to the
FBI, Congress and Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani, not even when offered reimbursement for the hard drive equipment he used to
make copies.
Censorship
Goes Official: House Democrats are Now Urging FBI to Investigate Parler. The social media app known as
Parler took a heavy blow when it had its entire website ripped out from under it due to Amazon pulling it off its servers
following the riot at the Capitol. Parler is now getting back on its feet, but now it has a new foe, the United States
Government. According to Fox News, the House Oversight Committee's top Democrat, Carlyn Maloney, is attempting to sic
the FBI on Parler, claiming that it was the platform that made the riot possible. Not only that, but she's also
claiming that it's a possible breeding ground for foreign countries to incite sedition.
House
Oversight chair asks FBI to investigate Parler. Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney, House Committee on Oversight and
Reform chair, on Thursday requested the FBI to investigate the social media platform Parler and any role it may have played
in the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol. The New York Democrat wrote a letter to FBI Director Christopher A. Wray
to ask that he investigate Parler, which was a platform that became popular with Trump supporters that felt unwelcome on larger
social media apps such as Twitter and Facebook. "I am writing to request that as part of its comprehensive investigation
of the January 6 assault on the Capitol, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) conduct a robust examination of the role that
the social media site Parler played in the assault, including as a potential facilitator of planning and incitement related to
the violence, as a repository of key evidence posted by users on its site, and as a potential conduit for foreign governments
who may be financing civil unrest in the United States," Ms. Maloney said in the letter.
FBI,
Justice Department knew there was no Russia collusion by spring of 2017. The top Justice Department official in
early 2017 overseeing the FBI's Russia probe testified he was briefed as many as six times on its status and was told there
was no evidence of Trump campaign collusion, a newly released transcript shows. The testimony of Dana J. Boente is
significant because during this time the FBI took major steps to expand the probe. And President Trump in May ended up
firing then-FBI Director James Comey, a stunning move that led to the appointment of special counsel Robert Mueller and two
years of a White House under constant criminal scrutiny.
FBI
Putting a Whole Lot More Effort Than It Did With BLM White House Rioters. I don't have a problem with arresting
people who break the law. I do have a huge problem with selective prosecution and enforcement. When Black Lives
Matter mobs besieged Washington D.C., attacked the White House, assaulted Secret Service members, vandalized national
monuments, and set a church on fire, the Attorney General had to lean hard just to get the most basic arrests and
prosecutions going. (It goes without saying that none of the rioters were fired.) And the media played defense for
the rioters and feigned outrage at criminalizing "protest". By September, the DOJ had managed to charge just 300 rioters
for taking part in the BLM violence nationwide. Not just in D.C. That's the tip of a vast iceberg. But now
the FBI is happy to go all out. [...] Imagine how 2020's race riots would have gone if the FBI had been as enthusiastic
about arresting Democrats as it is about arresting Republicans.
Is
the FBI Already Engaged in a Coverup in the Nashville Bombing? [Scroll down] There is nothing delusional
or irrational at all in thinking 5G, 4G, or any G before or since, including the earliest iterations of cellular, is being
used to spy on Americans. It's a fact. It is and has been. Indeed, it has been known since the publication
of James Bamford's book "The Puzzle Palace" that the National Security Agency and others have the capability to spy on
virtually every citizen of this country — and that was close to 40 years ago (1983)! And it's only gotten
worse since. I'm sorry to say it, but anyone who thinks he or she has any privacy is a fool. Even the current
president was spied upon. Edward Snowden, as I indicated in my previous column, made it clear just how deeply
implicated AT&T is in this activity. In fact, that company may well be the government's principal private industry ally
in clandestine work, helping to connect it with other cellular companies. If I know that, why wouldn't Warner, an IT
professional, know that? [...] I believe they are once again covering up here, creating a distraction from the actual motive,
because the one thing they don't want to be investigated — well, one among many — is the alliance
between private industry and our intelligence agencies, coupled with the realization we all live now in an Orwellian
surveillance culture, not dissimilar to that in China.
The
FBI's Latest Homegrown Terrorist Plot Is an Obvious Joke but What Is Going to Happen to the People Involved Is
Not. In March 2010, nine members of the so-called Hutaree Militia were arrested on charges of seditious
conspiracy, attempted use of weapons of mass destruction, teaching the use of explosive materials, and possessing a firearm
during a crime of violence. The next year, the same scene was played out in Georgia when four men, Frederick Thomas,
73; Dan Roberts, 67; Ray Adams, 65; and Samuel Crump, 68, were arrested and charged with conspiring to attack federal
buildings and kill federal officials. Focus on the ages for a second. In this case, one of the informants was
facing federal child porn charges and the prosecutor was none other than Sally Yates, who was acting Attorney General in the
first days of the Trump administration. Their real crime was being part of a "militia" and talking trash about the US
government. The two cases have a couple of things in common. They were brought by prosecutors who appeared to be
more interested in getting on board with the Obama administration's drive to muddy the waters of radical Islamic terrorism by
creating the illusion that "homegrown" (this invariably meant "white") anti-government terrorism was a greater threat than
the Islamic variety than they were in pursuing justice.
FBI
Was Investigating Trump Earlier Than It Let On, Texts Show. The FBI had investigations open into candidate
Donald Trump earlier than the July 31, 2016, date long cited in the official narrative, according to newly released text
messages from fired Deputy Assistant Director Peter Strzok. In a text message to FBI attorney Lisa Page sent on July 28,
2016, Strzok mentioned "our open [counterintelligence] investigations relating to Trump's Russian connections." The date of
the text message is significant because the bureau has long maintained that it opened the investigations into Trump campaign
associates on July 31 of that year. Notably, in the electronic communication memorializing the opening of the
investigations, Strzok wrote that the probes were triggered by information the bureau received on July 29, 2016.
The FBI has never disclosed that it was investigating Trump prior to that date. The bureau didn't immediately respond
to a request by The Epoch Times for comment. The information the FBI received pertained to a conversation between Trump
campaign adviser George Papadopoulos and Australian diplomat Alexander Downer. Papadopoulos told Downer that Russians
had damaging information on then-Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.
GOP
Leader McCarthy: FBI Stonewalling on Briefing Congress on Eric Swalwell's Reported Chinese Spy Ties.
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy said Wednesday he has asked the Federal Bureau of Investigation for a briefing on
Rep. Eric Swalwell's reported ties to a Chinese spy and the agency has canceled two times. "Swalwell is a national
security liability. This is too important for the FBI to continue to stonewall," he tweeted.
'Collusion' vs. Collusion.
Historians will dissect the origins and spread of the mass hysteria of Russian "collusion." The farce infected the
media. It discredited the Democratic Party. And it warped the popular culture between 2015 and 2020.
"Collusion" destroyed what was left of respect for the Washington FBI, the CIA, and the liberal news media. When 50
former "intelligence" officers can attest, right before the election, that the Hunter Biden scandal emails are likely Russian
disinformation designed to help Trump, then there is nothing much left of the reputation of our once best and brightest.
FBI
Has Files From Laptop of Slain DNC Staffer Seth Rich. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has files from
the laptop computer belonging to Seth Rich, a Democratic National Committee (DNC) employee who was killed in 2016, according
to a new email. The bureau also has tens of thousands of documents mentioning Rich. The FBI "has completed the
initial search identifying approximately 50 cross-reference serials, with attachments totaling over 20,000 pages, in which
Seth Rich is mentioned," Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrea Parker wrote in the message to attorney Ty Clevenger, who is
representing a plaintiff in Huddleston v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, a case dealing with a Freedom of Information
Act request to the bureau. "FBI has also located leads that indicate additional potential records that require further
searching," Parker added.
'Under
the rug:' Sexual misconduct shakes FBI's senior ranks. An assistant FBI director retired after he was accused
of drunkenly groping a female subordinate in a stairwell. Another senior FBI official left after he was found to have
sexually harassed eight employees. Yet another high-ranking FBI agent retired after he was accused of blackmailing a
young employee into sexual encounters.
We
have been manipulated and will not admit it. When you try and have a conversation about the abuse of power of
the FBI, the Justice Department, the CIA, and other government agencies, many Americans don't believe you and say, "I don't
think my government would do that." When told about the FISA application lies, under oath, to spy on Americans, they
would say, "I don't believe my government would do that."
Whistleblower
Jesse Morgan Interrogated by FBI Instead of Investigated, His Family Harassed. Steve Bannon: Are
authorities coming to you and saying, "Hey we need to sit down and interview you?" What is going on with where these ballots
are and what they are used for? Jesse Morgan: You know, it is really funny that you say that. I've been
interviewed, so I had a meeting with the FBI. Somebody, the OGI or some agency from the post office and a few other
people. So basically the interview, so here I am the witness basically gets kind of like interrogated I guess, you'd
say. Which is cool I understand that they're doing their job. So I give them what I saw what happened to me, what
I'd done. And what they wanted to do instead of focusing on the picture they wanted to focus over here and try to
figure out how I came on TV. [Video clip]
USPS
Truck Driver Says He Delivered 288k Completed Ballots From NY To Penn!. Jesse Morgan, a truck driver with USPS
subcontractor says he was suspicious of his cargo load of 288,000 COMPLETED ballots: "I was driving completed ballots
from New York to Pennsylvania. I didn't know, so I decided to speak up." [Video clip]
Senate holds
hearing on FBI's Russia investigation. The Senate Homeland Security Committee held a hearing on the FBI's 2016
'Russia Investigation. On Thursday [12/3/2020], the Committee heard from multiple witnesses affiliated with the
'Crossfire Hurricane Investigation.' Republicans have frequently asserted the FBI's Russia probe was really a
Democrat-led means of going after President Trump, which led to a number of security compromises. During the hearing,
senators questioned former FBI Assistant Director of Intelligence Kevin Brock, who argued the partisan investigation violated
FBI regulations.
FBI Buried
Hunter Biden Laptop. It's worth remembering that in June, 15 FBI agents were sent to Alabama to investigate
whether a knot tied like a noose in NASCAR driver Bubba Wallace's garage was evidence of a race crime. It wasn't.
One agent with a smartphone would have quickly discerned the truth — that the knot had been there for more than a
year — but because race is a third rail in American politics and culture, the FBI was determined to prove they
were on the job. The investigation was performative, designed to show that the FBI was taking the matter seriously,
even though it wasn't. The FBI's investigation into Hillary Clinton's private email server was also performative.
There was never any chance the 2016 Democratic presidential candidate was going to be charged with mishandling classified
information — not least because scores of other Obama officials, including the president himself, had communicated
with her on what they knew was an unsecure server. During his three-year tenure, FBI Director Christopher Wray has
allegedly made a habit of covering up for Obama administration officials.
The
FBI Spying Denial That Never Grows Cold. Four years after the FBI sent "Confidential Human Sources" secretly to
gather information on Donald Trump's team, the president's opponents in politics and the media continue to deny that the
bureau spied on his 2016 campaign. They are now using that denial to dismiss questions of voting irregularities in the
2020 election by arguing that Trump and his allies traffic in outrageous falsehoods for partisan purposes. [...] This might
appear at first glance to be a debate about semantics, a question of whether to call surveillance "spying" or something with
less negative overtones, such as "intelligence-gathering." Either way, it has been verified that the FBI took the
extraordinary step of investigating an ongoing campaign for the presidency. It has also been verified that the bureau
drew on its complete arsenal, including wiretaps and secret agents — both in-house "Undercover Employees" and
contract operatives called "Confidential Human Sources." Though the FBI doesn't use the word "spy" to describe its own
activities, the bureau's actions fit definitions of spying, old and new.
Who
Killed Philip Haney? In Amador County, California, on February 21, Philip Haney, author of See Something Say
Nothing: A Homeland Security Officer Exposes the Government's Submission to Jihad, was found dead from a single
gunshot wound. News reports suggested suicide but the local sheriff found "this is not the case." The death of Haney,
66, was a homicide, the unlawful killing of one person by another. The Amador County sheriff had no suspects but did
find some clues. Deputies recovered "numerous thumb drives and a laptop" from the crime scene, and "those items and
numerous other pieces of evidence, were turned over to the FBI." The sheriff "hopes to complete our review of the reports and
compare the FBI's analysis with what we have already collected and analyzed within a few weeks after receipt." That was
on July 22, and a week after the November 3 election, nearly eight months after the homicide, the FBI "analysis"
has not come to light.
Biden's
Laptop Problem. [Scroll down] The FBI's handling of the Hunter Biden hard drive and laptop, of which they
took possession some ten months ago, tells us all we need to know. In fact, we probably wouldn't have known of the FBI
possession of this evidence, unless reported by the [New York] Post or some other reputable media source. The
information on that hard drive could have abbreviated and ended the politically motivated congressional impeachment coup that
preoccupied Washington at that time. Crickets on that from the FBI. But more important and more disturbing:
Why was there no action from the FBI when that hard drive provided clear and voluminous evidence of high-level Chinese
Communist Party involvement with Hunter Biden and his partners and by implication the potential blackmail of Joe Biden that
could compromise American security? Clearly the Deep State is alive and well in the FBI and the DoJ of which
it is a part.
How
Serious Is The FBI's Biden Inc. Investigation? Almost certainly very serious. In the Indian
tribe fraud case in which two Hunter Biden associates were convicted (Devon Archer's conviction was very recently reinstated
on appeal), a lot of evidence regarding these key Biden Inc. players was gathered. One is now cooperating from
prison. Next question: What will Devon Archer do? Obviously what they have to offer to the government,
their bargaining chips, all have to do with Biden Inc. And the Biden Inc. case is open. Ongoing. But
they've had to wait for the hoped for cooperation, working the documentary trail of evidence while they wait. There's
another indicator, and it's a significant one. [...]
Reports:
FBI Confirms Custody of Hunter Biden Laptop and Authenticity of Emails. According to late-breaking information
from Fox News, the FBI has now confirmed the seizure of Hunter Biden's laptops and confirmed earlier DNI statements that
Hunter Biden emails were not part of a Russia disinformation campaign. The FBI confirms possession of the computers
which allegedly contain emails implicating former Vice-President Joe Biden in his son's international business
dealings. This FBI confirmation comes 12 hours after President Trump requested attorney general Bill Barr
'act fast' and expressed support for an appointment of a special counsel.
This
Is How the Left's Power Structure Collapses. [Scroll down] What's the word for a media establishment that
won't report this story? What's the word for the FBI having this laptop for almost a year, watching dispassionately as
the Democrats impeached Trump with hard evidence in their hands of his innocence and the Bidens' guilt? What's the word
for the above group of bad actors colluding to forward the Russia lies for almost three years? What's the word for
Director Wray's involvement? What's the word for CIA director not releasing documents of the Russia hoax, documents
that have been available for a long time? What's the all-encompassing word that has been revealed at the heart of all
these colluding to hide the truth from an America that deserves to know? Corruption.
FBI
in possession of Hunter Biden's purported laptop, sources say. The FBI is in possession of the laptop
purportedly belonging to Hunter Biden which contained emails revealing his foreign business dealings, including contacts in
Ukraine and China, two senior administration officials told Fox News Tuesday [10/20/2020]. The FBI declined to confirm
or deny the existence of an investigation into the laptop or the emails, as is standard practice. Further, Fox News has
learned that the FBI and Justice Department officials concur with an assessment from Director of National Intelligence John
Ratcliffe that the laptop is not part of a Russian disinformation campaign targeting Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden.
Johnson
to Wray: Tell us everything about Hunter Biden's alleged laptop. Ron Johnson asks a good question, even
if he may not like the eventual answer. Why didn't the FBI make the information on Hunter Biden's alleged laptop
available to the House and Senate during the impeachment of Donald Trump? According to the New York Post, the hard
drive contained information relating to the issue of potential corruption between the Bidens and Ukraine, the probe of which
touched off impeachment in the first place. There are two possibilities, both of which the chair of the Senate Homeland
Security Committee shares with Fox's Maria Bartiromo: [Video clip]
Sen.
Johnson: Has the FBI had the Hunter Biden laptop material for ten months? A Senate Republican leader has
raised new questions about the FBI's actions in the wake of news about alleged conflicts of interests involving former Vice
President Joe Biden, his son Hunter, and foreign influence and business opportunities. A whistleblower says that many
months ago, he provided the FBI contents of a laptop computer once used by Hunter Biden. That's according to a letter
to FBI Director Christopher Wray sent today by Chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.). The
letter states that an unnamed whistleblower contacted Sen. Johnson's committee on September 24, a day after the
committee released its investigation into alleged Biden conflicts of interest.
Conservatism Now Means Defeating the Establishment.
[Scroll down] The FBI got the Hunter Biden computer about a year ago, a computer full of emails about the Democrat
nominee's crack-curious son's adventures in influence peddling with Ukrainian robber barons and the Chi-Coms, and if some
computer repair guy in New Jersey hadn't thought to keep a copy of the contents the FBI would have deep-sixed the hard drive
just like it did Weiner's laptop in service of their Establishment masters. In fact, leakers are leaking that it's the
Russians at it again in order to actively and willfully cover up the biggest corruption story in American history.
'You
just made the connection': Top senator asked if FBI investigated child pornography on Hunter Biden's laptop. A
top Republican senator acknowledged the possibility that the FBI investigated whether there was child pornography on a laptop
and hard drive that allegedly belonged to Hunter Biden. Journalist Maria Bartiromo asked Sen. Ron Johnson, the
chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, about a Business Insider report that described
faint handwriting on a subpoena served last year to a Delaware business that was given a water-damaged MacBook Pro to repair
but was never retrieved and a hard drive with its contents. The hardware purportedly contained data about foreign
business dealings and other matters related to the son of former Vice President Joe Biden. The subpoena appeared to
show the FBI agent who served it was someone named "Joshua Wilson." [...] "I think you just made the connection. Again,
this is what the FBI, I think, has to come clean about," the Wisconsin Republican said in his first reply. Johnson was
alluding to his letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray about the laptop sent last week.
Why
Is The FBI's Top Child Porn Lawyer Involved In Hunter Biden Laptop Case? The recent New York Post
bombshell reports on Hunter Biden's alleged laptop contents included a curious piece of evidence — a photograph of an FBI
subpoena which bears the signature of the agency's top child porn investigator, special agent Joshua Wilson. According
to the Post, a laptop was dropped off at a Delaware computer repair shop by a man believed by the owner, John Paul Mac
Isaac, to be Hunter Biden. The shop owner made a copy of the hard drive before turning it over to the FBI, which
includes incriminating emails detailing alleged Biden family corruption in Ukraine and China, as well as a 'raunchy,
12-minute video that appears to show Hunter smoking crack while engaged in a sex act with an unidentified woman,' as well as
'numerous other sexually explicit images.' FBI agent Wilson's identity was confirmed by both Western Journal and
Business Insider, the latter of which compared his signature to a 2012 criminal complaint and concluded that it
"clearly matches the unreversed signature on the subpoena published by the New York Post."
The
FBI Is Investigating Hunter Biden, but the Reason Will Make You Angry. As RedState has been covering
extensively, Hunter Biden's emails have laid out more evidence of influence peddling and corruption among Joe Biden and his
son. Former denials have been blown up as it appears certain that the former VP was well aware of what his son was
doing. The latest email drop even asserts that Joe Biden was getting monetary kickbacks. To say this is a big
scandal is an understatement, regardless of whether the media want to cover it or not. Meanwhile, another part of this
was that the FBI has supposedly had this information since last year. Now, we know they are investigating, but it's for
the most ridiculous, yet predictable reason you could imagine. Instead of looking into whether laws were broken by the
corruption of Joe and Hunter Biden, the FBI is hot on the case of whether the emails are "Russian misinformation."
Did
the FBI Sit on a Computer Containing Evidence of Hunter Sex Tape and Biden Burisma Corruption? One of the
strangest details of the exclusive New York Post story involving the recovered data from a computer linked to Hunter Biden is
the story of the laptop itself and what is alleged about it. You can read about the evidence alleging that Hunter Biden
was trading influence with foreign actors in Matt Margolis's piece here. But what also interested me was the part of
the NYP investigation where they claim there's a sex tape and pornographic photos starring Hunter on the laptop —
and the FBI knew about it in December. [...] Let's forget for a moment that there's reportedly a video of Hunter Biden
smoking crack and romping with hookers on the laptop. That's par for the course, isn't it? What about the part
where the FBI had possession of this information back in December? Why didn't the FBI come forward with this evidence
about Hunter Biden's emails, which appear to show collusion and influence-trading? Isn't that something they should
have told the president or members of Congress?
House
Republicans Ask Director Wray if FBI Was in Possession of Hunter Biden's Laptop During Trump Impeachment and Hid Evidence
from Trump Defense. House Republicans on Thursday sent a letter to Director Chris Wray asking if the FBI was in
possession of Hunter Biden's laptop during the impeachment coup of President Trump. "If the FBI was, in fact, in
possession of this evidence and failed to alert the White House to its existence that would have given even more weight to
the president's legal defense, this was a gross error in judgement and a severe violation of trust," the letter says.
How
CIA tried to wave FBI off Trump-Russia conspiracy as it pointed the finger at Hillary Clinton. The CIA wrote a
highly classified three-page memo to FBI Director James B. Comey and agent Peter Strzok telling them that 2016 Democratic
presidential candidate Hillary Clinton had approved a plan to blame Russian computer hacking on rival Donald Trump. The
Washington Times obtained a copy of the heavily redacted memo sent to the FBI on Sept. 7, 2016, weeks after Mr. Strzok
had opened the Crossfire Hurricane probe into the Trump campaign on suspicion of conspiring with the Kremlin. Then-CIA Director
John O. Brennan wrote in notes that Mrs. Clinton allegedly approved the plan, one declassified document shows.
FBI
Stonewalls Over Hunter Biden; Refuses To Provide Congress Answers On Burisma, China. The FBI is stonewalling a
congressional inquiry into Hunter Biden's overseas business activity described in a Senate report last month which chronicles
the Biden family's international conflicts of interest, as well as potentially criminal business activity, according to
The Federalist. The Senate report detailed Hunter's financial dealings with Ukrainian, Chinese and Russian
businesses created potential "criminal financial, counterintelligence and extortion concerns," and alarmed US officials who
perceived an ethical conflict of interest and flagged potential crimes ranging from sex trafficking to bribery.
Basta! Time to Dismantle the FBI. Fox's Sean
Hannity [...] has long been in the forefront of the fight to expose the Trump-Russia probe which, we learn increasingly
virtually every day, was even more immoral, seditious, and anti-American than we had imagined. [...] But Sean H. evidently
made one, I regret to say serious, mistake, probably because he's basically a nice guy from a law enforcement family.
He insisted all along that the problems in the FBI were only at the top, the so-called "Seventh Floor," the domain of Comey,
Strzok, McCabe, and the others. Unfortunately, no. Also just revealed after three years are 302s
(near-contemporaneous notes made after an interview) and texts that show lower-ranking FBI agents too were aware of the
malfeasances that were occurring in the early stages of the Michael Flynn case. In fact these agents were so alarmed
they were considering professional liability insurance lest they be sued for the dishonest — one could even say
treasonous — activities in which they were being forced to participate. Frankly, I never imagined a FBI
agent could even buy such insurance. The implications are unpatriotic on their face. But live and learn.
It's interesting too, given the nervous chatter among themselves, not one of these agents became a whistleblower.
Stunning
revelations expose FBI's Trump probe as dirtiest political trick in US history. It was always a witch hunt
designed to "get Trump." Collusion was an illusion invented by a suspected Russian spy but zealously embraced by malevolent
actors at the FBI and later by scheming prosecutors on Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team of partisans. These are
the stunning revelations contained in two sets of newly declassified documents that pull back the curtain on the Russia Hoax,
the dirtiest political trick in American history. In testimony that is corroborated by records, FBI Special Agent
William J. Barnett has exposed how the bureau's collusion investigation of Donald Trump was based on nothing more than
"supposition on supposition" and devoid of any credible evidence.
FBI
agent Interview Reveals Bias Driving Investigations of Flynn, Trump. An FBI agent who worked on the
investigation of Michael Flynn and Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into "Russia collusion" told investigators
that prosecutors had a "get TRUMP" attitude that distorted their inquiry into the facts. The Department of Justice
released the record Thursday of a recent FBI interview with Special Agent William Barnett as part of its motion to drop the
charges against Flynn. Judge Emmet Sullivan has resisted efforts by the DOJ to drop the charges. Flynn originally
pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI, but withdrew that plea as exculpatory evidence emerged. A review of the case by
U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Jensen uncovered more exculpatory evidence, but Sullivan refused to allow the case to drop.
Explosive
New FBI Texts Detail Internal Furor Over Handling Of 'Crossfire Hurricane' Investigation. Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI) agents tasked by fired former Director James Comey to take down Donald Trump during and after the 2016
election were so concerned about the agency's potentially illegal behavior that they purchased liability insurance to protect
themselves less than two weeks before Trump was inaugurated president, previously hidden FBI text messages show. The
explosive new communications and internal FBI notes were disclosed in federal court filings today from Sidney Powell, the
attorney who heads Michael Flynn's legal defense team. "[W]e all went and purchased professional liability insurance,"
one agent texted on Jan. 10, 2017, the same day CNN leaked details that then-President-elect Trump had been briefed by
Comey about the bogus Christopher Steele dossier.
Apple
helps FBI track down protester accused of firebombing cop cars. Anyone who believes Apple and the FBI are at an
impasse over investigations into the iPhone maker's criminal customers should think again. In Seattle, Apple has given
the feds vital evidence from one of its iCloud users who was arrested for firebombing cop cars during the George Floyd
protests in late May. The case shows how Apple is willing to help even where the context of the crime is controversial,
namely the Black Lives Matter protests. That's despite President Trump and Attorney General William Barr lambasting the
company for failing to help track down serious criminals while caving in to the demands of the Chinese government.
Their comments came after Apple said it wouldn't help the government get into the physical iPhones of a Saudi national who
shot and killed three on a Pensacola, Florida, naval base in December 2019. (The FBI hacked into the phones anyway.)
A Tyranny Perpetual
and Universal? [Scroll down] Consider also the incredible abuses of power from the Justice Department,
the FBI, the intelligence community, and other agencies. Even with Trump in the White House, the administrative state
still does whatever it wants while hampering the lawful directives of the elected chief executive. So long as their
targets are in the disfavored party, they can spy on American citizens — up to and including presidential
candidates — lie to and entrap public officials, extort plea deals from the innocent, and leak highly classified
information for political purposes. (This is, needless to say, a very partial list.) They get away with all this
scot-free: no punishment, no correction, no rebuke. They not only pay no price for shredding the Constitution and
violating myriad statutes, but they are also lionized: the entire media and commentariat cheer them on. The fix is in,
and has been for some time, but we still pretend we live in the age of Eliot Ness, the incorruptible G-man.
FBI
Lawyer's Guilty Plea Suggests Spygate Corruption Goes Way Higher. Last week's guilty plea by Kevin Clinesmith
represents the first concrete evidence of movement in U.S. Attorney John Durham's investigation into the Russia collusion
hoax. The plea agreement, which was released on Wednesday, suggests another area ripe for inquiry: FBI Agent
Stephen Somma's earlier misrepresentation of former Trump campaign advisor Carter Page's status to those preparing the
initial Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) applications to surveil Page. Clinesmith, who served as an
assistant general counsel in the National Security and Cyber Law Branch of the FBI's Office of General Counsel, admitted in
his plea agreement that he had added the phrase "was not a source" to an email from an unidentified governmental agency, most
likely the CIA, concerning Page's "operation contact" with that agency.
Former FBI Attorney Kevin
Clinesmith Made Andrew Weissmann's Nightmares Come True By Pleading Guilty. Clinesmith is charged with having
altered the contents of an email from a CIA Liason on the subject of whether Carter Page had a historical relationship with
the CIA. In April 2017, the existence of a FISA warrant against Page had been leaked to the press by a Senate official
working for the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. With the press reporting that he was suspected of being a Russian
Agent, Page began giving interviews to address the question and disclosed that for several years he had been reporting to the
CIA on his contacts with suspected Russian intelligence officials. In fact, in 2013 Page had cooperated with the FBI in
the identification, investigation, and prosecution of three such Russian intelligence officers. While preparing the third
application to extend the Page FISA warrant, an FBI supervisor tasked Clinesmith to contact the CIA and find out if there was
any truth to the statements Page was making in the press.
Sketchy
Business — Clinesmith Agreement Structured to Avoid Scrutiny Upon Special Counsel. Remember, the
Special Counsel was appointed in May 2017, and from then until April 2019 any matter which had anything to do with Spygate or
Trump/Russia, was managed exclusively by the Special Counsel team. The Carter Page FISA warrant of June 29, 2017, was
renewed during the tenure of the Special Counsel. They alone ran the FISA process for the third renewal. Kevin
Clinesmith's boss at the FBI during the period was Trisha Beth Anderson. The Clinesmith criminal indictment (actually
an "information") informs that, while the Special Counsel was running the DOJ, and Andy McCabe was running the FBI, McCabe's
deputy at the FBI, Tricia Anderson, made this request to Clinesmith: ["]We need some clarification on [Carter
Page]. There is an indication that he may be a '[digraph] source.'["] Why is this "digraph" redacted
from the Clinesmith information?
Clinesmith
Gets The Wolfe Plea Deal. As noted in the DOJ press release: "Former FBI attorney Kevin Clinesmith, 38,
pleaded guilty today in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to a false statement offense stemming from his
altering of an email in connection with the submission of a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act ("FISA") application."
Despite the falsification of court documents within a FISA document; and despite the likelihood of an intentional conspiracy
to commit fraud upon the court in order to obtain a Title-1 surveillance warrant against the Trump campaign — via
Carter Page; the DOJ entered into a plea agreement on a single count of lying to federal officers. The agreement holds
a maximum penalty of zero to six months in federal prison and a $250k fine. This is the same plea agreement the DOJ (DC
U.S. Attorney) previously gave to the Senate Intelligence Committee Security Director James Wolfe, who leaked the SAME,
earlier, top-secret classified FISA application to the media on March 17, 2017.
Peter
Strzok Lashes Out at John Durham As Kevin Clinesmith Pleads Guilty to One Charge of Making False Statements.
Fired FBI Counter-intel chief Peter Strzok lashed out at US Attorney from Connecticut John Durham on Wednesday as former FBI
lawyer Kevin Clinesmith pleaded guilty to one charge of making false statements. In order to save himself, Clinesmith
has implicated others on Crossfire Hurricane — who ultimately hid the exculpatory information from the FISA
court? Perhaps Peter Strzok is a little nervous he may be next?
Will
the Dam Break After Clinesmith's Plea? News reports have downplayed the significance of former FBI lawyer Kevin
Clinesmith's guilty plea, acknowledging he altered an official document in the government's Trump-Russia collusion
probe. There has been some coverage, mainly because it is so rare to see FBI agents charged with a felony and because
it is the first tangible result of U.S. Attorney John Durham's sprawling investigation of the investigators. But
mainstream news outlets have minimized its importance. It's only one count, they say, and it deals with a relatively
minor crime by a mid-level figure. That's spin, and it's wrong. This plea is like finding water seeping from the
base of a dam. The problem is not one muddy puddle. The problem is that it foreshadows the dam's failure,
releasing a torrent. That's what the Clinesmith plea portends.
Trump:
Clinesmith Guilty Plea Is 'Just the Beginning' with 'More to Come'. President Trump on Friday [8/14/2020] said
that news of former FBI attorney Kevin Clinesmith's plea deal with Department of Justice prosecutors was "just the
beginning," signaling that U.S. Attorney John Durham is zeroing in on other targets in his investigation. Clinesmith is
expected to plead guilty in connection with his alteration of an exonerating email during the Crossfire Hurricane (CH)
investigation, which targeted members of Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign, including foreign policy adviser Carter
Page. In 2016, the CIA sent the email to CH investigators in response to their inquiry about the status of Page's
relationship with the CIA. Their response was not what the CH team was hoping for.
Clinesmith
Charging Documents: FBI Withheld Page's CIA Work From FISA Court, Then Lied About It. The FBI was told
Carter Page was a U.S. intelligence agency source months before the agency began keeping that information from the secret
court that authorized spying on him and nearly a full year before the agency altered documents to claim otherwise.
Federal charging documents against Kevin Clinesmith, the top FBI attorney who was expected to plead guilty today to altering
documents, show that the FBI withheld in three separate spying applications the fact that Page had served as an "operational
contact" who helped an agency believed to be the CIA investigate suspected Russian intelligence figures for five years.
For the fourth application, the agency didn't just hide that fact, but deliberately falsified evidence to claim he was not a source.
Kevin
Clinesmith, Corrupt FBI Attorney Who Falsified Carter Page FISA Warrant, Expected To Plead Guilty. A top FBI
lawyer who fabricated evidence in a federal spy warrant against Trump campaign affiliate Carter Page is expected to plead
guilty to federal charges brought by U.S. Attorney John Durham. Kevin Clinesmith, who is expected to admit to
deliberately fabricating evidence in a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant application, used to spy on a former
campaign affiliate of President Donald Trump, was a top attorney in the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Office of General
Counsel (OGC) and a key agency attorney under fired former FBI Director James Comey. Clinesmith is the first individual
to be charged as part of U.S. Attorney John Durham's investigation into the efforts in 2016 and 2017 to spy on the Trump
campaign and Trump administration. [...] Clinesmith's deliberate falsification of a federal spy warrant was first revealed
last December following a lengthy investigation by the Department of Justice (DOJ) Office of the Inspector General (OIG),
headed by Michael Horowitz. Horowitz and his team wrote in a 434-page report that Clinesmith — identified in
the report as "OGC Attorney" — altered an email from a separate U.S. federal agency, believed to be the Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA), to falsely state that Page had never worked with the CIA to investigate suspected Russia agents
operating within the U.S. In fact, as Clinesmith was told by the operative, Page had worked with the CIA previously, as
well as with the FBI.
Ex-F.B.I.
Lawyer Expected to Plead Guilty in Durham Investigation. A former F.B.I. lawyer intends to plead guilty to
falsifying a document as part of a deal with prosecutors conducting their own criminal inquiry of the Russia investigation,
according to court documents made public on Friday [8/14/2020]. The lawyer, Kevin Clinesmith, 38, who was assigned to the
Russia investigation, plans to admit that he altered an email from the C.I.A. that investigators relied on to seek renewed
court permission in 2017 for a secret wiretap on the former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, who had at times provided
information to the spy agency. Mr. Clinesmith's lawyers said he made a mistake while trying to clarify facts for a
colleague. Mr. Clinesmith had written texts expressing opposition to President Trump, who is sure to tout the plea
agreement as evidence that the Russia investigation was illegitimate and politically motivated.
Durham
probe: Ex-FBI lawyer to plead guilty in first criminal case arising from review, attorney says. Former
FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith will plead guilty to making a false statement in the first criminal case arising from U.S.
Attorney John Durham's review of the investigation into links between Russia and the 2016 Trump campaign, two sources close
to the matter tell Fox News. Clinesmith was referred for potential prosecution by the Justice Department's inspector
general's office, which conducted its own review of the Russia investigation. Specifically, the inspector general
accused Clinesmith, though not by name, of altering an email about former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page to say that he
was "not a source" for another government agency. Page has said he was a source for the CIA. The DOJ relied on that
assertion as it submitted a third and final renewal application in 2017 to eavesdrop on Page under the Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Act.
Russia
Hoax: Are We All Being Played? Put Up or Shut Up. [Scroll down] I never realized how terrible
the deterioration inside the system had become until four years ago when I stumbled onto what was happening inside the FBI.
Those concerns were brought to my attention by former and current FBI agents, as well as numerous U.S. intelligence officials
aware of the failures inside their own agencies. But it never occurred to me when I first started looking into fired
FBI Director James Comey and his former side kick Deputy Director Andrew McCabe that the cultural corruption of these once
trusted American institutions was so vast. I've watched as Washington D.C. elites make promises to get to the bottom of
it and bring people to justice. They appear to make promises to the American people they never intended to keep.
Who will be held accountable for one of the most egregious abuses of power by bureaucrats in modern American political
history? Now I fear those who perpetuated this culture of corruption won't ever really be held accountable. These
elite bureaucrats will, however, throw the American people a bone. It's how they operate. They expect us to
accept it and then move on.
Igor
Dyachenko and a 34 Month Long DOJ/FBI Cover-Up Operation. CTH friend, researcher and producer John Spiropoulos
helps connect the dots within the operation to cover-up corrupt activity by James Comey, Andrew McCabe, James Baker,
Christopher Wray, Dana Boente and the entire special counsel group. In this video John walks us through the internal
evidence showing how the FBI intentionally hid the statements by Christopher Steele's primary sub-source Igor
Danchenko. The result: a 34 month cover-up operation.
Did
The FBI Mislead The Senate Intelligence Committee On The Steele Dossier? The Media Is Not Interested. The
latest information comes from the Senate Intelligence Committee which released a declassified briefing report to the Senate
Intelligence Committee in 2018 on the Steele dossier's Primary Sub-source. It is hard to read the document linked below
and not conclude that the FBI misled the Congress on the subject. This occurred after the FBI misled the FISA court,
including the submission of falsified documents to continue the surveillance. The statement that most stands out from
the briefing is that the Primary Sub-source "did not cite any significant concerns with the way his reporting was
characterized in the dossier to the extent he could identify it." Keep in mind that this is a statement made in 2018.
FBI agents had already warned that dossier author Christopher Steele may have been used by Russian intelligence to plant
false information to disrupt the election. Indeed, Steele's allegations were quickly discredited by the FBI. In 2017,
key agents were aware that the basis for the FISA applications were dubious and likely false. Yet it continued the
investigation, and then someone leaked its existence to the media.
Ron
Johnson subpoenas FBI Director Wray in Crossfire Hurricane investigation. A top Republican senator subpoenaed
FBI Director Christopher Wray on Monday to appear before the Senate and produce "all records" related to the FBI's Crossfire
Hurricane investigation into Russian election interference and allegations of Trump-Russia collusion. The subpoena, a
copy of which was obtained by the Washington Examiner, includes a request for the documents the FBI handed over to DOJ
Inspector General Michael Horowitz for his damning report the surveillance of onetime Trump campaign associate Carter Page
and the bureau's reliance on British ex-spy Christopher Steele's flawed dossier.
Attkisson
v. Rosenstein for government computer intrusions. The following is an excerpt from the brief being filed today [8/3/2020] in
Maryland state court in Attkisson v. Rosenstein and others for the government computer intrusions. Plaintiff Sharyl
Attkisson, an award-winning journalist — along with her husband and child — have tried for years to pursue their significant and
credible claims of illegal government surveillance, but the U.S. Government has stonewalled them at every turn. Yet, despite
the Government's repeated efforts to obfuscate and delay, the Attkissons detailed in their Complaint:
• Expert forensic computer analysis of the Attkissons' computers, revealing that an unauthorized entity or
entities gained remote access to the Attkissons' computers for a prolonged period, and that one of the pathways by which the intrusions
occurred were IP addresses controlled by the U.S. Government.
• Confirmation, via testimony, that the U.S. Government controlled the IP addresses identified in the Attkissions' computers.
• The degree to which senior figures in the Department of Justice were concerned about, and took steps to
block, Sharyl Attkisson's reporting, as well as her use of confidential governmental sources;
• Many documented instances of abnormal, otherwise unexplained behavior of the Attkissons' computer systems and devices.
Evidence
Shows FBI Tried to Tie Citizen Trump to Epstein Case But with No Success. During the investigation of Jeffrey
Epstein citizen Donald Trump's name came up. The FBI attempted over and over to tie the famous New York developer to
misconduct, but to no avail. Per a review of documents released last night in the Jeffrey Epstein case, the FBI tried
to tie the now deceased pedophile to citizen Donald Trump but were unable to do so.
Tick,
Tick, Boom, Boom, Time's Up, Obama Goons? James Comey and John Brennan routinely defend their assault on the
peaceful transfer of power and their undermining of President Trump's legitimate election as those actions required by a
"higher loyalty" to the institutions they once steered. Instead, they and the large group of political and permanent
government saboteurs who have betrayed their country for the purpose of toppling a duly elected president have destroyed
those institutions by their own hands. And even if Durham were to round up everyone involved, from Barack Obama and
Hillary Clinton to former Senate Intelligence Committee staffer James Wolfe and Joe Biden's Deep State mole Eric Ciaramella,
the genie is out of the bottle. Justice delayed is justice denied. The horror we've witnessed unfolding before
our eyes since before President Trump's inauguration will never be recast into anything remotely akin to "justice."
Disgraced
fired FBI officials Comey, McCabe and Strzok profit from a pathology of lies. Lying is pathology.
Habitual liars do so compulsively, often to benefit themselves. The same is true of corrupt people. They seek to
prosper from their corruption. For proof, look no further than the venal characters fired from the FBI after inventing
the Trump-Russia collusion hoax — Director James Comey, Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, and Agent Peter
Strzok. All three were fired for their abuse of power, corrupt acts, and suspected lies. Undaunted, they now
profit financially from their misdeeds. Strzok is the latest to capitalize on his infamy. He is set to release a
book in September titled "Compromised: Counterintelligence and the Threat of Donald J. Trump." The irony
should be lost on no one. Can you think of anyone more compromised than the notorious and smug Strzok?
Declassified
Documents Show FBI Used 'Defensive' Briefing In 2016 To Spy On Donald Trump. Newly declassified internal
Federal Bureau of Investigation documents prove the top U.S. law enforcement agency used a so-called defensive briefing of
the Trump campaign in 2016 to spy on and collect information about Donald Trump himself. The new documents, which are
just the latest in a string of declassifications regarding the FBI operation to spy on the Trump campaign and later the Trump
administration, detail the FBI's attempts to use a briefing ostensibly meant to warn the Trump campaign about foreign
intelligence threats to spy on the Trump campaign itself. The documents were formally declassified by Director of
National Intelligence John Ratcliffe on July 23 then provided to Sens. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), the chairman of
the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.), the chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and
Government Affairs Committee.
New
FBI Notes Re-Debunk Major NYT Story, Highlight Media Collusion To Produce Russia Hoax. The FBI official who ran
the investigation into whether the Donald Trump campaign colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 presidential election
privately admitted in newly released notes that a major New York Times article was riddled with lies, falsehoods, and
"misleading and inaccurate" information. The February 2017 story was penned by three reporters who would win Pulitzers
for their reporting on Trump's supposed collusion with Russia. The FBI's public posture and leaks at the time supported
the now-discredited conspiracy theory that led to the formation of a special counsel probe to investigate the Trump campaign
and undermine his administration.
FBI Conspires
Against Trump. As we continue uncovering details of the coup against President Trump by top Obama/Deep State
officials, we've also noted the FBI and DOJ are still slow-rolling the release of information about the scandal. So,
frustratingly slowly — but surely — we're getting piece after piece of the Obamagate puzzle. We
received another batch of emails, 136 pages, between former FBI official Peter Strzok and former FBI attorney Lisa
Page. They include heavily redacted emails showing Strzok, Page and top bureau officials in the days prior to and
following President Donald Trump's inauguration discussing a White House counterintelligence briefing that could "play into"
the FBI's "investigative strategy."
The
Mysterious Journey of an FBI Leak Investigation. In January of 2017 California Senator Dianne Feinstein
abdicated her position as Vice-Chair of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI). Upon the initiation of a
new congress, and two weeks before the inauguration of President Donald Trump, Virginia Senator Mark Warner took the SSCI
Vice-Chair seat, and that's how things get started. Amid a concerted effort to resist the incoming administration the
Russia Collusion Conspiracy was launched. Politicians, the U.S. intelligence apparatus and DC beltway media united in
common purpose to push a Trump-Russia narrative. Within the early days of that effort, the Senate Select Committee on
Intelligence initiated an investigation into Russian interference with the election.
FBI Refuses
To Disclose Records On Source Who Undermined Steele Dossier. The FBI is refusing to release documents related
to the primary source for dossier author Christopher Steele, saying in response to a public records request that the
information is classified and risks identifying a confidential FBI source. The source, whose identity remains a
mystery, holds key information that could shed light on apparent inaccuracies in Steele's dossier, which the FBI cited
extensively in applications for surveillance orders against Trump campaign aide Carter Page. The decision, which the
FBI made in response to a Freedom of Information Act request filed by The Daily Caller News Foundation, comes as Republican
lawmakers have increasingly accused the FBI and its director, Christopher Wray, of withholding documents relevant to the
investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian government.
Stu
Evans' Lonely, Failed Quest to Save the FBI From Itself. False accusations that the Trump campaign colluded
with Russia have already cost some of the most senior officials at the FBI and the Department of Justice their reputations,
their careers, or both. The widespread wrongdoing raises the question: Where were the honest lawmen and
women? Was there no one willing to challenge superiors — or even just colleagues — gone
rogue? There may have been at least one. As deputy assistant attorney general for the Office of Intelligence,
Stuart Evans had the responsibility of vetting spy warrants before submitting them to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance
Court. In the fall of 2016, the FBI presented Evans with an application for a warrant to capture the communications of
volunteer Trump campaign foreign policy adviser Carter Page. The main justification for getting a wire on Page were
allegations by former British spy Christopher Steele. Instead of credulously embracing the Steele dossier as so many
others did, Evans demanded more information about Steele. He put up bureaucratic roadblocks and manned them stubbornly
while asking the essential questions no one else seemed to care about.
No kidding.
Wray
Has 'Serious Concerns' About Comey FBI's Investigation Of Michael Flynn. FBI Director Christopher Wray said in
an interview aired Wednesday that he has "serious concerns" about how the bureau handled the investigation into former
national security adviser Michael Flynn. "I will say... the Flynn investigation, which took place before I started, and
by the time I started was in the hands of the special counsel's office, is something that has in my view raised serious
concerns and questions," Wray told Fox News anchor Bret Baier.
Fifth
Redacted Name in Rosenstein's Scope Memo Identified as Walid Phares. An interesting new discovery amid
revelations into the background motives of President Obama to weaponize the intelligence apparatus against his political
opposition. [...] Today [6/18/2020] former Trump campaign foreign policy advisor Walid Phares identified himself as the fifth
target in the August 2, 2017, Rosenstein scope memo.
"Social
Justice Warrior-ing" — Is That Now Taught at the FBI Academy? This story is actually being urged
upon me, and I find myself a bit conflicted. At first, I tried to find a reason to sympathize with whatever predicament
the FBI Agents found themselves that caused them to kneel down. There is conflicting reporting about whether the Agents
kneeled in order to minimize the potential for confrontation with a much larger group of protesters who were calling for them
to do so, or whether the Agents were, in fact, demonstrating sympathy for the views being expressed by the protesters.
That was a story put out that was sourced to anonymous FBI officials. But the more I look at what happened, and the
more agents I talk to, the more obvious it seems that someone in FBI management is trying to rescue these agents from the
internal and external consequences of their horrendous judgment. After I watched the video which is embedded here, I
struggled to see any coercion or compulsion for their actions. [Video clip]
Democrats,
Not Republicans, Protect Dirty Cops. Abuse and inequality — at the hands of American law
enforcement — comes in all forms. [...] Calls for police reform and accountability are happening on a bipartisan
basis. That has not been the case, however, when it comes to Obamagate. Democrats, led by the forked-tongue
Schiff, have spent the past three years defending, even justifying, unprecedented abuses by the nation's top law enforcement
chiefs related to their targeting of Donald Trump, his associates, and his family members. The Trump-related victims of
James Comey's FBI may not be black, they were unfairly targeted nevertheless. It was not race that motivated their
persecutors, nor was it any actual suspected wrongdoing. They were targeted because of their political views.
It's
Worse Than We Thought — DNI Ratcliffe Declassifies "Annex A" The Supportive Documents For 2017 Intel Community
Assessment. DNI John Ratcliffe has declassified the Appendix to the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment
(ICA). The appendix known as "Annex A" was the material the FBI and CIA did not include in the body of the ICA; however,
it was used to brief congress. There was always suspicion that "Annex A" was the ridiculous claims by FBI source
Christopher Steele; those suspicions are confirmed today [6/11/2020]. The ICA was written in late December '16 & early
January 2017, and the purpose was to politicize intelligence by making outlandish claims of the Trump-Russia conspiracy the
official position of the U.S intelligence apparatus (CIA, FBI, DOJ and NSA).
Unable
to Run Its Own Agencies, Washington Dictates to America's Police. The FISA court recently found federal
intelligence agencies guilty of an "institutional lack of candor" in dealing with the tribunal. That conclusion has
only been bolstered by Justice Department reports outlining stunning abuses of power by the FBI, serial lying and leaking by
top officials, fabrication of evidence, and investigations launched on a dearth of predication and furthered by entrapment
tactics and perjury traps. We never did get to the bottom of the Justice Department's "Fast and Furious" scandal, in
which the ATF allowed illegal firearms transfers into Mexico — evidently hoping to fuel a political narrative
against the Second Amendment but succeeding only in fueling violent Mexican gang crime that claimed the life of a
border-patrol agent.
Sen.
Graham refuses to let FISA abuse get pinned on low-level FBI staff: 'I believe it goes to the very top'.
Sen. Lindsey Graham says that he plans on calling former FBI Director James Comey and former deputy director Andrew
McCabe to testify before his Senate Judiciary Committee, because he doubts they were unaware the dossier compiled by
ex-British spy Christopher Steele had been debunked before it was used to get a FISA warrant to monitor former Trump campaign
adviser Carter Page. After former Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein denied having knowledge of any altered
documents or that the Steele dossier had been disavowed beforehand, McCabe responded by saying that Rosenstein's claim that
he was misled by him or anyone else at the FBI "are completely false." Graham, R-S.C., told Fox News' "Sunday Morning
Futures" that he wants to press McCabe on his knowledge regarding the FBI's interview with Steele's sub-source, who denied
the information in the dossier.
FBI
Pledge Allegiance to Black Lives Matter, Antifa, Nation of Islam and New Black Panthers Protesters. In a
display of public unity with 'The Movement' writ large, FBI officials took a knee to declare their woke allegiance with the
protesting mobs. With that visible display we now have a better understanding of the motives behind a history of FBI
failures. Setting aside the optic that some members of the FBI looking more like 'meal-team-6', there was always a
suspicion the FBI were more concerned about political correctness than actually doing the work of a federal investigative
agency. Historically the FBI has failed miserably to stop domestic terror threats; and when the investigative failures
are researched there's usually a prior connection between the attackers and the FBI.
Time
for the FBI to Disclose, Discharge, and Disinfect. When Christopher Wray was named director of the FBI in
August 2017, he had two crucial tasks: clean the Augean Stables, which had been fouled by James Comey, and restore public
confidence in the bureau. Comey presided over a carnival of misconduct. Comey and his deputy, Andrew McCabe,
supervised all of it and handpicked most of the other agents involved. Wray's job was to muck out this mess, disclose
the wrongdoing, fire the bad guys, and win back public support. To put it bluntly: he has failed at the job. He
has failed the country, the president, and his fellow agents.

The
FBI has its priorities! Washington, DC was on FIRE last night. You are the the top Federal Law
enforcement agency in the United States and THIS IS WHAT YOU ARE TWEETING ABOUT TODAY??
Dana
Boente Removed! — FBI Chief Legal Counsel Forced to Resign. Finally, the DOJ has moved to remove one
of the biggest background corrupt officials within the FBI. According to multiple media sources FBI chief legal counsel
Dana Boente was forced to resign on Friday [5/29/2020]. Finally, sunlight has removed a very corrupt player. In
prior positions as U.S. Attorney for Virginia; and while leading the DOJ National Security Division; and then later shifting
to the FBI as chief legal counsel under Chris Wray; Dana Boente was at the epicenter of corrupt intent and malign activity
toward the Trump administration.
How
The FBI Used 'News Hooks' To Advance The Trump-Russia Probe. A common theme that has emerged from the FBI's
Crossfire Hurricane investigation is bureau officials' use of media reports and leaks to advance aspects of the bureau's
probe of the Trump campaign's possible ties to Russia. In at least five instances, FBI officials capitalized on the
so-called news hooks — also called news pegs, in journalistic jargon — as justification to open up new
areas of the investigation. James Comey, Andrew McCabe and Peter Strzok all took advantage of media reports to push the
investigation forward. And in one case, Comey orchestrated a leak of his own to spur the appointment of a special
counsel. Prominent media outlets played a key role in advancing the now-debunked theory that the Trump campaign
colluded with the Russian government. Much of that media manipulation centered around the infamous Steele dossier,
which the Clinton campaign and DNC funded.
AG
Barr [is] Not So Confident in FBI Director Chris Wray Anymore. Since February 2019 Bill Barr has been a staunch
and very public defender of Chris Wray. However, with new revelations about recent FBI efforts to block the release of
information as it relates to Michael Flynn, it now appears the AG has less confidence. This shift is important because
as the public have a renewed focused on the question of who illegally leaked Flynn's communication with Russian Ambassador
Sergey Kislyak, there has always been a rather curious contrast issue with the known classified intelligence leaking of James
Wolfe. If finding Flynn's leaker is important then why didn't the DOJ/FBI take action when they found a classified
intelligence leaker in 2018?
Report: Grenell Just
Outsmarted the FBI and Took them Out of the 2020 "Election Game" With this Brilliant Move. There's no doubt
about it... Grenell is one, two, three steps ahead of the Deep State and he's not taking any chances when it comes to the
2020 election. The Trump admin has learned a very valuable lesson about the dirty games the FBI played in 2016 and
they're not about to let what happened with the bogus "Russia Collusion" scandal happen again as we head into 2020.
Grenell made a brilliant move to take away the FBI's power in 2020 by announcing that any "election security" matters will
be handled by the intel agencies that he oversees.
Fixing the FBI.
To fix the FBI, we need to understand what went wrong with it. It is now beyond debate, and should be a bipartisan
concern of the first order, that something was very wrong with the FBI's most senior leadership in 2016-17. It is clear
that Donald Trump's election was the catalyst for that leadership to take one of the most important organs of our government
completely off the rails. The conduct of former FBI Director Comey personally, and the FBI senior leadership in his
tenure, has emerged as a history of repeated conduct that now demands examination. It starts, but unfortunately does
not end, with failed leadership at the bureau that in turn facilitated the bureau's unmistakably taking up a politically
driven agenda.
It
looks like President Obama ordered up phony RussiaGate scandal. RussiaGate is now a complete dead
letter — but ObamaGate is taking its place. Just how far did the then-president go to cripple his
successor? It's now clear the Obama-Comey FBI and Justice Department never had anything more substantial than the
laughable fiction of the Steele dossier to justify the "counterintelligence" investigation of the Trump campaign. Yet
incessant leaks from that supposedly confidential probe wound up consuming the Trump administration's first months in
office — followed by the Bob Mueller-led special-counsel investigation that proved nearly the "total witch hunt"
that President Trump dubbed it. Information released as the Justice Department dropped its charges against
Gen. Mike Flynn shows that President Barack Obama, in his final days in office, played a key role in fanning the flames
of phony scandal.
A Time to Hate. [Scroll down] Lt. Gen. Flynn
never deserved what was done to him. He was targeted for destruction by criminals and crooks in the FBI. They set
out to destroy him. The FBI is not allowed to bother law-abiding people like you and me, to set us up, and to induce us
to commit a crime. They are permitted to pursue criminal investigations only when they have a predicate before
them. In the case of Flynn, they had in their possession a complete recording and transcript of his phone call with
Sergey Kislyak. Yet they interviewed him and asked him to tell them what was said during the call. The Bureau of
Investigation was not investigating; they already knew the answer. Rather, they were setting him up to speak a
falsehood, to commit the crime of lying to the FBI, an act whose criminal dimensions he did not appreciate as a layman.
They dissuaded him from having an attorney at the interview so he would slip into the trap. A competent attorney would
have protected him.
Why
Did Obama Tell The FBI To Hide Its Activities From The Trump Administration? In 1980, a teenage Amy Carter left
a burnt cake in the oven of the White House's family quarters in a reflex of childish revenge for her father's landslide loss
to Ronald Reagan. In 2017, Barack Obama and Joe Biden avenged Donald Trump's surprise victory over Hillary Clinton by
leaving what they claim was a Russian agent in the West Wing. That conclusion inevitably follows if one accepts as
credible the FBI's supposed predicates for launching the Crossfire Hurricane investigation into the Trump campaign and the
four related probes into George Papadopoulos, Carter Page, Paul Manafort, and Michael Flynn.
Two
Important Transcripts Shed Light on the FBI and Two of Their Informants. This piece is based on two of the
transcripts that Adam Schiff was forced to release last Thursday and they are revelatory. The first concerns Felix
Sater. The second is from the FBI Agent who handled Christopher Steele. The agent's name is kept
confidential. If you are the FBI and you are running a counter intelligence investigation into Trump's ties with the
Russians you would want Felix Sater, who helped the FBI on several cases involving Russian spies and Russian organized
crime. He was a business partner of Donald Trump's since at least 2001. And what does Sater reveal about The Donald's
ties to the Russian mob and Russian spies? He exonerates Trump. Then we have the unnamed FBI handler of
Confidential Human Source Christopher Steele. He admits to knowing Sater and some of the things he did for the FBI.
Any evidence of Trump cavorting with the Russians? NOPE. After you read the transcript you will appreciate why
this FBI agent is not named. He did his job honestly and professionally. In fact, he's the one who terminated
Steele as a source.
Transcripts
Contradict Comey's Claim That DNC Denied FBI Access to Servers. An attorney who represented the Democratic
National Committee in connection to the hacking of its servers and the private cybersecurity expert who led the response to
the breach both contradicted the testimony to Congress given by then-FBI Director James Comey, who claimed that the FBI
sought and was denied access to DNC's physical servers. Michael Sussman, an attorney with Perkins Coie, told lawmakers
on the House Intelligence Committee in December 2017 that the FBI declined to access the DNC premises when offered to do so
during a meeting which included cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike in mid-June of 2016, according to a newly declassified
transcript. During the meeting, the chief executive officer of the DNC, Amy Dacey, relayed to the FBI that the bureau
"could have access to anything they needed," according to Sussman.
Robert
Mueller memo shows why each key figure was targeted in probe. The Justice Department has released a largely
unredacted copy of former acting Attorney General Rod Rosenstein's 2017 memo laying out the scope of former special counsel
Robert Mueller's investigation, offering a previously unseen glimpse into how the Russia probe was framed. "The Scope
of Investigation and Definition of Authority" was released Wednesday at the request of Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and
Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), the current and former Judiciary Committee chairmen. The memo, dated as being sent on Aug. 2,
2017, and written to Mueller when Rosenstein was serving as deputy attorney general, specified five people whom he was permitted
to investigate: Carter Page, Paul Manafort, Michael Flynn, George Papadopolous and one other whose name was redacted.
Are
Russia Collusion Hoax Holdouts Still Operating Within the FBI? What is it like inside the seventh floor of the
FBI's Hoover fortress while revelations of constitutional abuses lash the walls like a never-ending hurricane season of the
FBI's own making? Newly released documents have refocused attention on the FBI's abuses in the Flynn prosecution.
The FBI's dirty tricks in the Flynn prosecution are almost too numerous to inventory. Does FBI Director Christopher
Wray fret over the increasing perception that the FBI has become a rogue police force unbound by constitutional checks and
balances? Is he feverishly working behind the scenes to root out perpetrators of spying abuses that targeted opponents
based upon politics and other non-law enforcement purposes? A new interview with former journalist Carl Bernstein
signals that there remains a Russia collusion hoax rearguard within the FBI in spite of the resignations, firings, and
departures of Crossfire Hurricane figures, including Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Bill Preistrap, James Baker, James Comey, and
Kevin Kleinsmith.
Jim
Jordan: Wray's FBI failed to turn up missing FISA files. The top Republican on the House Oversight
Committee is turning up the heat on FBI Director Christopher Wray to answer for persistent flaws in the Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Act process. Rep. Jim Jordan sent a letter to DOJ Inspector General Horowitz on Friday, zeroing in on
widespread issues found in the preliminary results of a March FISA audit. The Ohio Republican noted "the FBI was unable
to locate the Woods files for four additional files that the OIG had requested — meaning the OIG could not review
those applications." His letter, which was obtained by the Washington Examiner, reveals that as of April 21, the
DOJ watchdog reported, "The FBI had not yet located or followed-up on these four missing Woods files."
DOJ
releases long-awaited Mueller scope memo, revealing the probe went beyond previously known mandate. The Justice
Department on Wednesday released a mostly unredacted version of then-Acting Attorney General Rod Rosenstein's August 2017
"scope memo" outlining the authority of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller — and the document reveals for the
first time that Mueller's authority went significantly beyond what was known previously. Rosenstein, who later left the
Justice Department for a law firm, oversaw Mueller's probe and played a central role in its still-unfolding drama. He
was the subject of a two-page memo written by then-Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe that outlined how Rosenstein allegedly
proposed wearing a wire in the White House "to collect additional evidence on the president's true intentions," and thought
the scheme was plausible because "he was not searched when he entered the White House." Rosenstein has denied those
allegations and slammed the FBI.
Walls
Closing In Around FBI Director Chris Wray as Documents Show His Enabling of Corrupt FBI Objectives. An
interesting article from Fox News asks the question of whether Mueller's special counsel attorney Brandon Van Grack misled
Judge Sullivan in the Flynn case by not being forthcoming about the background documents under the DOJ Brady obligation.
Additionally, as a consequence of the Flynn evidence discoveries people are now asking why the FBI and DOJ did not produce these
documents earlier. Representative Jim Jordan is specifically asking these questions of current FBI Director Chris Wray.
In response to the Fox News article the FBI has released a statement which itself is very interesting. Apparently the FBI
Director is trying to dig himself and his institution out of a hole; but it is only getting worse.
Pressure
mounts on Wray as FBI behavior in Russia case comes into clearer focus. Back in early 2018, the FBI under newly
minted Director Chris Wray issued an extraordinarily rare public rebuke of a sitting House committee chairman.
Then-House Intelligence Committee chairman Devin Nunes had just issued a memo concluding that the FBI under Wray's
predecessor, James Comey, abused the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act process to improperly spy on President Trump's
campaign. Wray fired back, even though the issues didn't happen on his watch, suggesting Nunes had given an inaccurate
picture to the American public.
America
Doesn't Have A Justice System Anymore. [Scroll down] And this sorry state of affairs is all the FBI's
fault. Every bit of it. At one time it was the pride of American law enforcement, a symbol of integrity, honesty
and incredible courage under fire. But now when we think of the FBI in "action," we think of a couple dozen special
agents decked out in full Delta Farce chic dragging an elderly gadfly out of bed in his PJs after making sure to tip-off CNN
that this high-risk op was about to go down. Way to go, guys.
Flynn
documents are the 'smoking gun' on Comey's FBI. Had the Department of Justice (DOJ) released the newly
disclosed documents related to Gen. Michael Flynn three years ago, instead of fired FBI director James Comey improperly
leaking his "memos" on President Trump, there definitely would have been a special counsel — only it would have
been investigating the FBI for gross abuse of power, not the Trump administration. The new documents are in effect the
"smoking gun" proving that a cabal at the FBI acted above the law and with extreme political bias, targeting people for
prosecution rather than investigating crimes. DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz found 17 violations of policy and
procedure in the initiation of the investigation of President Trump's campaign. Special counsel Robert Mueller's report
found no evidence of any Trump-Russia collusion. And yet, much of the media coverage of all this has been so riddled with
bias that, in a recent poll, 53 percent still believe Trump colluded with the Russians to win the 2016 presidential election.
The
FBI's 'Russiagate' search-and-destroy mission against Team Trump. With the latest revelation, the FBI's "Russiagate"
investigation now stands exposed as worse than amateurish — and more like a search-and-destroy mission. Destroy
the Trump administration, that is — not actual US enemies. Lawyers for ex-Gen. Michael Flynn released
just-unsealed documents that suggest the FBI abused its power to take out President Trump's first national security adviser.
The FBI
has disgraced itself. [Scroll down] This week, we learned that an American hero, a loyal lifelong and
proved courageous defender of our nation, was callously framed by a political conspiracy of the most senior FBI
officials, seeking thereby to defame and destroy the newly elected president of the United States, Donald Trump.
Over the years, the FBI regrettably has shown itself to be self-serving and inept and has suffered several disgraceful
scandals, but always committed by lesser men. Today, the FBI, at the very top, has shown itself to actually be
seditious, subverting the office of the president of the United States!
K.T.
McFarland gives hair-raising interview about being 'collateral damage' in FBI's goal 'to get Trump'. Former
Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland exposed the corrupt FBI's investigation of former National Security Adviser
Michael Flynn as really an attempt to take out President Donald Trump. McFarland slammed fired FBI Director James Comey
and the agency's efforts to set up Flynn as revealed in newly released notes that show how he was ambushed in an interview in
January of 2017. Comey "thought he was going to get away with" the blatant perjury trap set for the former Trump adviser,
McFarland told Fox News host Martha MacCallum.
Joe
diGenova: Former FBI General Counsel James Baker Has Flipped and There's a Mole Inside the FBI.
Washington attorney Joe diGenova, a former U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, spoke to radio show host Howie Carr on
Wednesday. Though the interview took place before Thursday night's stunning release of FBI documents pertaining to
Gen. Michael Flynn, he reported some fascinating new information about the Durham investigation. DiGenova told
Carr there is now a mole inside the FBI "who is leaking to the press about the current conduct of FBI Director Christopher
Wray and his general counsel, Dana Boente.
Even
The Manipulated Senate Intel Report Can't Hide FBI Spies And Lies. On April 21, the Senate Select Committee on
Intelligence released a report on its review of the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) drafted for President Barack
Obama on Russia's interference in the 2016 election. Corporate media immediately touted the Republican-controlled
committee's finding that "the ICA presents a coherent and well-constructed intelligence basis for the case of unprecedented
Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election," including by hacking Democratic National Committee emails, as
vindication of the intelligence communities' handling of all things Russia. But a close reading of the report —
or at least those portions of the report that could be read — instead cements the reality that the FBI
intentionally snowed the FISA court to spy on Donald Trump.
The
Russians did it — Revised Version. For three years, the left has been peddling the story that the
Russians interfered in the 2016 election in collaboration with the Trump campaign, with the ridiculous Steele Dossier cited
as the proof. Now, the Party Line has shifted. The Russians still did it, says the new line, possibly working
with the Clinton campaign, only they fed disinformation to the gullible Christopher Steele, who than helped deceive the
innocents at the CIA and the FBI. So if these agencies spent three years conducting a sham investigation that hamstrung
the American Presidency and embittered political relations — well, it was still the Russian's fault.
Declassified
Footnotes From IG Report Reveal FBI Was Warned Multiple Times About Hillary's Phony Dossier — Used it Anyway to
Spy on Trump. CBS News reporter Catherine Herridge obtained newly declassified footnotes in IG Horowitz's
report showing multiple warnings to the FBI about Hillary's phony Russia dossier but they used it anyway to spy on Trump's
campaign and to sabotage his presidency. As TGP previously reported, Chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee
Ron Johnson and Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee Chuck Grassley Tuesday sent a letter to Attorney General Bill Barr
asking him to declassify four footnotes in Horowitz's report on FISA abuse. The Senators stated that the classified
footnotes contradict what is publicly available in Horowitz's report related to Crossfire Hurricane, the CI investigation
opened into Trump's campaign in July of 2016.
The
13 revelations showing the FBI never really had a Russia collusion case to begin with. They've come slowly,
drip by drip: the reluctant revelations of an FBI bureaucracy. But taken together, the body of evidence now amassed
over two years of investigating the investigators explains why Attorney General William Barr last week declared there was
never really a basis to probe Donald Trump's campaign for alleged collusion with Russia. "I think the president has
every right to be frustrated, because I think what happened to him was one of the greatest travesties in American history,"
Barr told Fox News' Laura Ingraham. "Without any basis they started this investigation of his campaign, and even more
concerning, actually is what happened after the campaign, a whole pattern of events while he was president. to sabotage the
presidency, and I think that — or at least have the effect of sabotaging the presidency," the attorney general said.
It
looks like Putin conned the FBI into the 'Russiagate' probe. It is becoming increasingly clear that the Russia
investigation launched and conducted by James Comey's Federal Bureau of Investigation deserves to rank as one of the agency's
great blunders — at best. President Trump famously calls the probe a hoax, a label he uses liberally, but in
this instance, it may literally be true. We've spent years obsessing about Russian meddling in our politics, and now it
turns out that the original FBI investigation into the Trump campaign that morphed into the Mueller probe may have been
instigated, in part, by Russian disinformation.
FBI
Knew Before Mueller Probe That Hillary's Steele Dossier Was Russian Disinformation. In a Friday night, holiday
weekend document dump, we're now learning that before the Mueller investigation began, the FBI knew that at least part
of the ridiculous so-called Steele dossier was based upon planted Russian disinformation. Worse, according to Senator
Ron Johnson in a Wall Street Journal op-ed released Friday night [4/10/2020], the FBI continually lied about the
provenance of the fake dossier information and only showed the FISA court and inspector general damning information about
President Trump's election team. Exculpatory information was left out.
Exculpatory
Papadopoulos Transcript — FBI Surveillance Wire — Declassified and Released. Richard
"Ric" Grenell was moved into the position as Acting Director of National Intelligence. Together with a new staff within
the ODNI Grenell is now in position to assist in any declassification effort. Thus we also see the apoplexy by HPSCI
Chairman Adam Schiff, as Grenell is positioned to bring a lot of sunlight on the overall FISA-gate and Spygate operations.
The corrupt intelligence community operators are not happy with Grenell holding such power. Keep this in mind.
Interesting
Ramifications: FISA Court Requires DOJ/FBI To Provide Names of Targets Within Corrupt Surveillance Applications. Things
are getting interesting, potential ramifications are growing, as the FISA Court responds to the latest information from the DOJ Office of
Inspector General (OIG). After a review of 29 FISA applications, from eight FBI field offices, the OIG informed the FBI and DOJ that
none of the surveillance applications were compliant with the Woods procedures. Meaning zero applications had FBI evidence to support
the validity of the claims within the FISA warrants. That's a very big problem if those FISA warrants were used to gather evidence
used to prosecute the 29 targets of the applications.
Some
questions about that IG report blasting the FBI for FISA abuses. It's a tough situation, because we know that
the FBI leadership illegally spied on Donald Trump's campaign adviser Carter Page, apparently out of political motives
conjunctive with the mass unmaskings of U.S. citizens seen elsewhere in the Obama administration. But is every last FBI
agent out there in the field offices hopelessly crooked? Is every last G-man we look at on TV now to be viewed with
suspicions of dishonesty? Are we supposed to now think they all went from being straight arrows in the Marine Corps and
the police agencies they were recruited from and collectively went to the dark side? I have my doubts — it
takes a lot to create a culture of mass criminality, and typically, we'd be seeing more than just FISA abuse if that's what
has been going on. Think thievery, corruption, torture, thuggery, nepotism, corruption, blatant rule-breaking, all
over, as you might with a mafia. So far, we don't see that.
The
FBI Can't Be Trusted With the Surveillance of Americans. For years, we civil libertarians were told that our
concerns about the secret court that oversees the FBI's applications to monitor U.S. citizens were overblown. So what
if the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court approved more than 99% of all applications. The bureau and Justice
Department must follow an onerous process, we were assured, that protects innocent citizens from being snooped on by their
government. Those assurances, as it turns out, were not very reliable. On Tuesday [3/31/2020], the Justice Department
Inspector General Michael Horowitz issued a new report that found systematic errors of fact in the FBI's applications for warrants
under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. The memo does not speak to the materiality or significance of those
errors — but they are startling nonetheless. Out of 42 applications, the report says, 39 included major
defects. All told, the inspector general uncovered 390 deficiencies, including "unverified, inaccurate, or inadequately
supported facts, as well as typographical errors."
DOJ's
FISA report contradicts claims by Dems, media figures that surveillance rules were strictly observed. New
findings by the Justice Department inspector general that the FBI has repeatedly violated surveillance rules stood in stark
contrast to the years of assurances from top Democrats and media commentators that bureau scrupulously handled Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants — and prompted Republican lawmakers to caution that the FBI
seemingly believes it has "carte blanche to routinely erode the liberties of Americans without proper justification." The
DOJ watchdog identified critical errors in every FBI wiretap application that it audited as part of the fallout from the bureau's
heavily flawed investigation into former Trump advisor Carter Page, who was surveilled in part because of a largely discredited
dossier funded by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC). An FBI lawyer in that case even
falsified a CIA email submitted to the FISA court in order to make Page's communications with Russians appear nefarious, the DOJ
inspector general found; and the DOJ has concluded that the Page warrant was legally improper.
FBI's
coronavirus 'fitness app' slammed as a way to extract personal info. The FBI is helping gym rats looking to
stay in shape during the coronavirus lockdown by promoting a fitness app — but it requires users to provide their
GPS coordinates. The law enforcement agency urged people in a Monday tweet to "download the FBI's Physical Fitness Test
app to learn proper form for exercises you can do at home like pushups and situps." The catch is that the FBI FitTest
created in 2018 uses the "phone's GPS and accelerometer," which the FBI claims provides the user a "more realistic PFT
experience." The digital workout tool has been slammed on social media as a sneaky way for the government to extract
personal info amid the coronavirus pandemic.
DOJ
Dismisses Mueller's Charges against Russian Businesses. More than an investigation, the Mueller probe was the
wellspring of a political narrative. That becomes clearer as time goes by and more information ekes out ... such as
new confirmation that, months before Mueller was appointed in May 2017, it was already well understood in Justice Department
circles that there was no case of criminal "collusion" between the Trump campaign and Russia.
What
if Hillary had won in 2016? If Hillary Clinton had won the 2016 election, we would not know about the
enormously complex attempted coup she undertook, with a vast cast of characters, to defeat Donald Trump as a candidate and
then unseat him once he was elected president. Only because she lost, do we now know a great deal about all that.
We know Hillary commissioned and paid for the vaunted "dossier," that she hired Fusion GPS to deliver opposition research
that would take candidate Trump out of the running. We know that bad actors in the FBI (James Comey, Andrew McCabe,
Pete Strzok, et. al.), at the DOJ (Sally Yates, Rod Rosenstein, Bruce Ohr, et. al.), at the CIA (John Brennan) and James
Clapper at the DNI all coordinated with each other to destroy Trump by wholly fraudulent means. Thanks to the wisdom of
the voters, we now know all about their crimes against this country. Numerous books have been published by intrepid
actual journalists that have laid out what happened in tremendous detail. Hopefully when AG Bill Barr and prosecutor
John Durham release their report, we will be privy to all the details of the whole sordid story of the most venal political
scandal in American history.
Details
of FBI's targeting of Trump emerge in Horowitz report. Justice Department Inspector General Michael E.
Horowitz's history of how the FBI targeted Donald Trump associates has become a constant presence on social media as
journalists and Russia aficionados make more discoveries and connect the dots. Every page of the Horowitz report
contains new disclosures. The report's banner headline was that FBI agents supplied inaccurate information or withheld
exculpatory evidence 17 times when they asked judges to approve four wiretap warrants on campaign volunteer Carter
Page. Morsels of information placed in footnotes or buried in a few sentences also tell a fuller story about the
Trump-Russia investigation.
Inside
the FBI's 218 days that changed Trump's political world. Donald Trump campaign alumni wonder today what
happened inside the FBI over 218 days from mid-August 2016 to March 20, 2017, that changed their lives forever.
August was the month a special FBI unit code-named Crossfire Hurricane picked four Trump associates for Russia-related
counterintelligence cases. Former FBI Director James B. Comey testified later that it was not the campaign but "four
Americans" under the microscope. On March 20, 2017, Mr. Comey told the world that the entire Trump team faced
investigation for "any links" to Russian government. What changed during those 218 days? First, there was no
evidence at the time that the four had conspired with the Kremlin to hack Democratic Party computers or join in social media
warfare against the Hillary Clinton campaign. There would never be any evidence.
FBI's
Russia collusion case fell apart in first month of Trump presidency, memos show. The piecemeal release of FBI
files in the Russia collusion investigation has masked an essential fact: James Comey's G-men had substantially
debunked the theory that Donald Trump's campaign conspired with Moscow by the time the 45th president was settling into the
Oval Office, according to declassified memos, court filings and interviews. And that means a nascent presidency and an
entire nation were put through two more years of lacerating debate over an issue that was mostly resolved in January 2017
inside the bureau's own evidence files. The proof is now sitting in plain view.
The
Democratic Party Is Wounded And Dangerous. The Democrats and the Deep State have spent the last four years
constructing the greatest wag-the-dog spectacle America's ever seen in an attempt to cover up the malfeasance and criminality
of the last administration, while preventing the current one from achieving too many victories. Considering that
Brennan and Comey are still free and Obama and Hillary are still smiling, they've been remarkably successful. But the
Mueller obfuscation and Schiff circus are behind us, the dance music of delay is dying down, and the Democrats' and Deep
State's ability to keep pushing back their day of reckoning is coming to an end. If they don't win in 2020, they cannot
keep justice at bay, regardless of how stacked in their favor it has always been in the past.
FBI
missed chances to stop domestic terror attacks because of lack of follow-up: DOJ watchdog. The FBI missed
opportunities to stop domestic terrorists from killing Americans because field offices failed to further investigate
individuals who had been labeled homegrown violent extremists, the Justice Department watchdog said in a scathing report
released Wednesday [3/4/2020]. At least six terrorists who later carried out attacks killing a total of 70 people
were on the FBI's radar prior to the attacks. However, the agents quickly closed the cases, concluding the suspects
were not threats to national security, according to the Justice Department inspector general. Among the more
high-profile individuals the FBI failed to recognize as a potential source of terrorism were Omar Mateen, who killed 49
individuals at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando in 2016, Nidal Hasan, who massacred 13 people at Fort Hood, Texas, in 2009, and
Esteban Santiago, who killed five people in a 2017 terror attack at the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport.
The FISA States of America.
The Justice Department brazenly disregards the Constitution when it comes to spying. Does FISA help prevent
terrorism? As I noted here, the government obtained more than 1,000 warrants in a one-year timeframe to spy on
Americans. That's a lot of spying on a lot of Americans. The Justice Department's lying to obtain these warrants
has become so brazen that the court now questions whether it can trust any of the affidavits the FBI submits to
justify its domestic surveillance. The fact that none of these lies are ever criminally punished further reinforces a
cycle of dishonesty within the process.
Government Tries to Cancel Trial
in Key Mueller Case Because the Defendant Isn't Playing Fair. If there is a unifying feature in the entire
Mueller investigation beyond it being an unsuccessful coup attempt against President Trump is that it was a Seinfeld-esque
"investigation about nothing." By the time Robert Mueller had pulled on his jackboots he already knew with near mathematical
certainty that the key piece of evidence he was working from, the Steel dossier, had been the subject to nearly nine months
of unsuccessful effort by the FBI and intelligence community to verify it. The report by Department of Justice
Inspector General Michael Horowitz documents the extreme and dishonest lengths gone to by the FBI to keep the Steele dossier
in play. When the Special Counsel did file indictments (if you were ever an the laughably dishonest LawFareBlog or
anywhere on the left you knew it because you'd see BOOM! or "It's Mueller time" in their tweets") they had zero relationship
to the alleged subject of the investigation and involved process crimes, not substantive acts. But the most significant
indictment by Mueller was that of Concord Management, a company owned by Putin crony Yevgeny Viktorovich Prigozhin, and
thirteen individual Russians, who may or may not exist, affiliated with the so-called Internet Research Agency. I say
may or may not exist because one of the commercial entities owned by Prigozhin did not even exist when the alleged crimes
took place and people involved in covert activities often use fake identities [...]
New
Book: The FBI Considered Joseph Mifsud an Asset. The official story of Operation Crossfire Hurricane
provides that the investigation began with an accidental meeting between Papadopoulos and Alexander Downer, an Australian
diplomat. The story holds that in May 2016, Papadopoulos and Downer had a chance meeting in a London bar during which a
"heavy drinking" Papadopoulos revealed the Trump campaign "knew" the Russians possessed thousands of hacked Clinton emails
that it intended to release to influence the 2016 election. When Wikileaks did indeed release hacked DNC emails in July
2016, Downer made a beeline to the FBI to report the lead on possible coordination between the Trump campaign and the Russian
email dump. Papadopoulos tells a different story.
Democrats Block
FISA Reform. Are House Democrats willing to jeopardize national security to keep alive their Trump-Russia
collusion narrative? On Wednesday they abruptly canceled a markup on a bill to reauthorize three critical surveillance
tools that are due to expire March 15. To listen to the liberal media, the bill has stalled over concerns about "civil
liberties." In truth it's the latest casualty of Democrats' refusal to acknowledge that the Federal Bureau of Investigation
abused the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court [...]
Why
is The New York Times Outing Lower Level FBI Spygate Operatives? A previously incurious New York Times is now
exposing members of the FBI crew who participated in fraud upon the FISA Court. Are the corrupt former top-tier FBI
officials starting to position lower-level FBI participants as scapegoats? Inside an insufferable article, engineered
to defend the need for the DOJ and FBI to continue using FISA intelligence gathering information against U.S. persons, the
New York times outlines Stephen M Somma as Case Agent 1, the handler for FBI confidential human source Stefan Halper.
GOP
Rep. Nunes believes FBI probe into Trump campaign began in late 2015, not 2016. The FBI began looking into
the Trump presidential campaign before the agency's publicly stated July 31, 2016, start date, says Rep. Devin Nunes,
the top Republican on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. "I believe it started in 2015, but there's
no question that it started in early 2016," Nunes said on the latest episode of the "John Solomon Reports" podcast. The
California lawmaker said he's "highly confident" that the federal probe into whether the Trump campaign colluded with Russia
to influence the outcome of the 2016 White House race began in late 2015.
FBI Agent Faulted
In FISA Report For 'Significant' Errors Has Finally Been Identified. An FBI agent faulted for some of the most
significant problems laid out in the Justice Department's inspector general report on FISA abuse against a Trump campaign
associate has been identified. The New York Times, citing people familiar with the FBI's Russia probe, identified
Stephen A. Somma, a counterintelligence investigator who works out of the bureau's New York field office, as "Case
Agent 1" from the inspector general's (IG) report.
The case for repealing
FISA and reforming the FBI and CIA. The FBI, in its bungling partisanship, very likely swung the 2016
presidential election away from its preferred candidate, Hillary Clinton. The sprawling "community" of
intelligence agencies (led by the FBI and CIA) covertly used dubious foreign sources to justify monitoring an American
political campaign and, later, a U.S. presidential administration. To do so, it invoked daunting foreign-counterintelligence
surveillance powers, based on a fever dream that its bête noire, Donald Trump, was an agent of the Kremlin. And
the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court recently chastised the FBI for feeding it false and unverified information —
the secret court apparently calculating that this extraordinary public expression of wrath will divert attention from its own shoddy
performance in approving highly intrusive spy warrants based on sensational, blatantly uncorroborated rumor and innuendo.
DOJ
Is Infected With Organized Crime, Trump Has Every Right To Push For Change, In Fact It's His Sworn Duty. It is
painfully obvious the Department of Justice is infected with organized crime, awash with Obama infiltrators, only intent on
maintaining power, not dispensing justice to those they don't agree with or those they see as political enemies. The
Roger Stone affair is all the evidence you need of that. Their shame,, and primal fear, is also obvious in their
discomfort with Donald Trump tweeting, in other words, getting his message direct to the American people, away from the
corrupt media filters. Trump needs to keep doing just that. It is his right, no it is his sworn duty, to uphold
the Constitution and its guarantees to the American people, something the Democratic Party and its media enablers have long
since cast aside as a priority. We need a full investigation, and a full accounting of what happened at DOJ and what is
still going on. If William Barr can't put out the fire, or can't stand the heat, we need to find another fireman.
Who's
complaining about investigations now? Attorney General William Barr is looking into the murky origins of the
politically-charged Justice Department investigations that have roiled American public life for the last three years.
Just how did the FBI's "Crossfire Hurricane" investigation into the 2016 Trump presidential campaign get started? What
led the FBI to look into whether President Trump was working on behalf of Russia? Why did the Justice Department use an
ancient, never-enforced law as a pretext to interrogate then-national security adviser Michael Flynn, leading to one of the
most troubling court cases in recent years? And more. Each investigation involved highly publicized leaks that
led to many headlines and endless discussion on cable TV. Anti-Trump voices stood firmly in support of more and
more detailed inquiries of the president and his allies.
Andrew
Weissmann: AG Barr Is Starting New Investigation into Fired FBI Officials Jim Comey, Andrew McCabe and Peter Strzok.
Little crooked man Andrew Weissmann told Chuck Todd today [2/16/2020] the new investigation initiated this week by Attorney General Bill
Barr involving US Attorney in St. Louis Jeff Jensen is a ruse to investigate Jim Comey, Andrew McCabe and Peter Strzok. On
Friday [2/14/2020] Attorney General Bill Barr assigned an outside prosecutor to review the abusive case against General Mike Flynn.
Barr also assigned a handful of prosecutors to review other cases in the US Attorney's office in DC.
Top
Mueller Prosecutor Says DoJ Starting New Investigation Into Comey, McCabe, and Strzok. An interesting twist is
arising from the decision of Attorney General Barr to name an outside counsel, Jeffrey Jensen, to investigate the Michael
Flynn case. The former top prosecutor on special counsel Robert Mueller's team says the ploy by Barr is a "ruse" so
that the Department of Justice can open a new investigation into former FBI officials James Comey, Andrew McCabe, and Peter
Strzok. Andrew Weissmann, a former Justice Department official who was known as Mueller's "pit bull" during the Russia
investigation, says that "all they did was swapped out a loser case for starting an investigation that is going to be of
Comey, McCabe, Pete Strzok," Weissmann told MSNBC host Chuck Todd. "Weissman is referring to the "loser" case of
prosecuting former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe for lying about media leaks during the Russia investigation.
Top
Mueller prosecutor: DOJ starting new investigation into James Comey, Andrew McCabe, and Peter Strzok. One
of Robert Mueller's former top prosecutors said the outside prosecutor picked to review the case against retired
Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn is a ruse to investigate President Trump's perceived enemies. Andrew Weissmann, a
former Justice Department official who was known as Mueller's "pit bull" during the Russia investigation, said the Justice
Department swapped out the "loser case" of Andrew McCabe, who escaped criminal charges on Friday for allegedly lying to
investigators about authorizing media disclosures, for a fresh one targeting top former FBI officials, including McCabe, led
by Jeffrey Jensen, the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri. "All they did was swapped out a loser case
for starting an investigation that is going to be of Comey, McCabe, Pete Strzok," Weissmann told MSNBC host Chuck Todd.
Senator
Graham claims he will finally use his Judiciary Cmte to investigate the lying liars at the FBI & DOJ.
[Video clip]
Lindsey
Graham asks DOJ for interviews with 17 officials in FISA abuse investigation. Sen. Lindsey Graham
requested "transcribed interviews" with 17 Department of Justice and FBI employees as part of the Senate's investigation into
abuse of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. The South Carolina Republican sent a letter requesting the
interviews to Attorney General William Barr on Friday [2/14/2020]. Graham is chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee
and is heading the congressional investigation into the FBI's investigations into the Trump campaign in 2016.
The
FBI Corruption is Far Worse Than We Currently Imagine. Last month the DOJ admitted to the FISA court that two
of the four FISA warrants used against Carter Page were fraudulently obtained. [...] However, what the DOJ did not admit
publicly was how the current FBI Chief Legal Counsel, Dana Boente, participated in obtaining the April 2017 warrant.
Additionally, a review of the internal FBI & DOJ scheme to obtain the fraudulent April warrant shows FBI Director James Comey
couldn't get the renewal unless he convinced Main Justice to trick the President into issuing an executive order to grant
surveillance on himself. In hindsight this story explains the ongoing issues within the FBI.
House
Republicans Rebuke FBI Director Wray for Tepid Response to IG Report. House Republicans unleashed on FBI
Director Christopher Wray about the bureau's lackluster response to the [serious] problems uncovered in the DOJ Inspector
General's report on FISA abuses, according to the Washington Times. At a House Judiciary Committee hearing yesterday,
Wray claims he went "above and beyond" to provide accountability and made more than 40 changes to the bureau's FISA policies
and practices. "The failures highlighted in that report are unacceptable — period," he said. "They
don't reflect who the FBI is as an institution and they cannot be repeated."
Key
witness told Team Mueller that Russia collusion evidence found in Ukraine was fabricated. One of Robert
Mueller's pivotal trial witnesses told the special prosecutor's team in spring 2018 that a key piece of Russia collusion
evidence found in Ukraine known as the "black ledger" was fabricated, according to interviews and testimony. The ledger
document, which suddenly appeared in Kiev during the 2016 U.S. election, showed alleged cash payments from Russian-backed
politicians in Ukraine to ex-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort. "The ledger was completely made up," cooperating
witness and Manafort business partner Rick Gates told prosecutors and FBI agents, according to a written summary of an April
2018 special counsel's interview.
How
Democrats' Get-Trump Crusade Has Irreparably Damaged The Nation. The FBI's malfeasance in the launch and
handling of Crossfire Hurricane provides the starkest example of damage wrought without regard to the ramifications.
Americans no longer trust the world's premier law enforcement agency because of men like James Comey, Andrew McCabe, and
Peter Strzok, and women like Lisa Page. They no longer believe in equal justice under the law, or the integrity of
sworn affidavits and judicially authorized surveillance. Current FBI Director Christopher Wray has promised a clean-up,
but that likely won't be enough either for the public or for the FISA court. And it is the damage in the eyes of the
FISA court that risks much more than the faith Americans place in law enforcement agencies — it puts at risk the
lives of Americans. The FISA courts exist not for political warfare, but to combat terrorism.
Trey Gowdy on the FBI: The Bureau
Was Out to Get the President. On Fox News Thursday, erstwhile South Carolina Republican Rep. Trey Gowdy
fired upon former Federal Bureau of Investigations Director James Comey and 2016-2018 FBI Deputy Director Andrew
McCabe. Trey told host Martha MacCallum the deeds of top FBI officials was sufficient evidence to suspect they were
"out to get" Donald Trump. [...] The host noted Trump's reference to the salvation of Comey's firing, founded upon the idea
that it was he who allowed such a culture in the Bureau to grow. Gowdy agreed, with an expansion: "Yeah, I would
correct the President's narrative only to this extent: He replaced Comey with McCabe. That is hardly moving up
the draft board. It was only when Chris Wray came in that I think you had a dispassionate, objective,
law-enforcement-centered person. McCabe was no better than Comey."
Now Let's Get Down To Business.
[Scroll down] Each time President Trump came close to declassifying the material someone from the DOJ intercepted the
anticipated action and blocked the release. In the fall of 2018 it was DAG Rod Rosenstein. In the summer of 2019
it was AG Bill Barr. Amid the twists and turns many people have forgotten about the material congress asked President
Trump to declassify two-years-ago. Additionally there has been some material cited that just seemingly slipped away
without follow-up. Consider:
• Whatever happened to the forty pages of Lisa Page and Andrew McCabe text messages that Catherine Herridge noted nine months ago? Herridge only published four of the pages in March 2019.
• Why are the Lisa Page and Peter Strzok text messages still redacted two years after their original release (December 1st, 2017)?
• Where's the release of the Susan Rice inauguration day memo to the file?
• Why didn't the DOJ/FBI release all of the Bruce Ohr 302's without redaction? Will those fully unredacted 302's be part of the IG report release?
• Where's the unredacted David Archey FBI declarations that were previously ordered to be released by a DC judge?
• The Mueller investigation ended 10 months ago. Why are we still not able to see the unredacted three authorization memos that Rosenstein gave to the special counsel on May 17th, August 2nd and October 20th, 2017?
Corruption
Coverup — Nadler Schedules FBI Oversight Hearing With Chris Wray on Same Day as Impeachment Vote.
[C]ould House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler be any more transparent with his intentions here? Knowing all eyes will
be on the Senate impeachment vote at 4:00 pm on the same day, Democrat Chairman Nadler schedules the House oversight hearing
on FBI (FISA Misconduct) for 10:00 am Wednesday, February 5th, to bury it. FBI Director Christopher Wray
has not been scheduled to face any questioning or public scrutiny by any legislative oversight body since the Inspector General
report highlighted gross corruption and FBI misconduct in the December 9th, 2019, FISA report. Additionally, the DOJ/FBI
response to the demands of the FISC were also extended to February 5th. The corrupt institutions, and the administrative
state that surrounds them, are working overtime to avoid any exposure and national discussion about misconduct that should alarm
everyone. Why? Because they targeted Donald Trump... So, bury it.
As
Impeachment Ends, It's Time to Correct These Nine Injustices. [#5] Reform the CIA and the FBI. We've learned
in the last 3-4 years that both the CIA and the FBI participated in the Russia collusion hoax even after it was known to be a
hoax. Where were the whistleblowers? One answer is that these two powerful agencies don't rotate their officials
the way the military does. Keeping the same power-players working together for decades creates fertile ground for
conspiracy. They learn each other's secrets and come to depend on a kind of "omerta" to their mutual benefit. A
few fresh faces will keep these power players more accountable as they will never know whether the new guy will "play ball."
The
FBI Has Been Lying About Seth Rich. A persistent American lawyer has uncovered the undeniable fact that the FBI
has been continuously lying, including giving false testimony in court, in response to Freedom of Information requests for
its records on Seth Rich. The FBI has previously given affidavits that it has no records regarding Seth Rich. A
Freedom of Information request to the FBI which did not mention Seth Rich, but asked for all email correspondence between FBI
Head of Counterterrorism Peter Strzok, who headed the investigation into the DNC leaks and Wikileaks, and FBI attorney Lisa
Page, has revealed two pages of emails which do not merely mention Seth Rich but have "Seth Rich" as their heading. The
emails were provided in, to say the least, heavily redacted form.
Preventing Another 'Crossfire Hurricane'. Sometime
this year, the U.S. Attorney for Connecticut, John Durham, will probably have a grand jury issue indictments of some of the
"Crossfire Hurricane" leaders. Among them will likely be former FBI agent Peter Strzok, former FBI deputy director
Andrew McCabe, and former FBI director James Comey. He may also indict some of the CIA's current and former leaders
including Obama's CIA director John Brennan and current CIA Director Gina Haspel (Brennan's protégé) who ran
the overseas elements of "Crossfire Hurricane." However many of the "Crossfire Hurricane" team are indicted, and
whether or not they are convicted, their indictment will shake the FBI (and, we hope, the CIA) to their cores. The
indictments will have the effect of dissuading further secret investigations of presidential campaigns but even that effect
will not be permanent, nor will they prevent another "Crossfire Hurricane" from ever happening again.
Codes of Conduct From the Swamp.
[A]pparently our country's intelligence community was out to put the clamps on Mr. Trump even before he was
elected. Slowly we are finding out that, for instance, FISA warrants included warrants that were illegal. We are
finding out that these agencies were eavesdropping on Trump and his aides. Conservatives always defended the CIA and
FBI against career civil libertarians. Now we are finding out that these agencies were used against President Trump and
his people. What did the Trumpians do to antagonize the intelligence community? Do the heads of these agencies
really think that Donald Trump colluded with Vladimir Putin? I have not seen the evidence. A two-year
investigation conducted by Special Counsel Robert Mueller could not find the evidence either. So let us come up with
the evidence that will convince Americans that, as John Brennan, formerly of the CIA, has said, Trump's behavior was
"treasonous." Treasonous? The evidence?
Grassley
Letter Asks Whether Taxpayers Paid Russian Agent To Help Start The Collusion Hoax. On Wednesday [1/22/2020],
Sen. Chuck Grassley's office released a letter he penned to James Baker, the director of the Office of Net Assessments
for the Department of Defense. Grassley's letter ostensibly concerned fiscal oversight, but the details revealed by the
finance committee chair raise new concerns about FBI confidential human source Stefan Halper. Grassley's letter began
with a recap of his previous record requests, noting that in July 2019, the chair had requested "all records related to
Professor [Stefan] Halper's contracts with DoD." Grassley then highlighted several revelations discovered during the finance
committee chair's review of those documents, including various weaknesses in Halper's various proposals.
Sharyl
Attkisson Speaks Out. There are many books, TV shows, and movies about once-revered FBI agents portaying them
as heroes. But after revelations concerning Donald Trump, Richard Jewell (accused of the Atlanta Olympic bombing), and
well-respected journalist Sharyl Attkisson, people might be reconsidering. Maybe FBI should stand for Fear, Beware, and
Intimidate, while DoJ, the parent company, should stand for Department to Obstruct Justice. Granted, many do their jobs
well, but the leaders at the top are definitely suspect to having an agenda.
The Comey
coverup unravels. In a curious report on Thursday evening [1/16/2020], the New York Times carefully averts its
eyes from everything that's interesting. Even Adam Schiff has acknowledged that James Comey's actions in 2016 may
represent the most important and significant Russian influence on the election. Surely one of the most consequential
pieces of intelligence ever received by U.S. agencies was, as we now learn, received in early 2016 from a Dutch
counterpart. This is the dubious Russian intelligence that set off Mr. Comey's multiple interventions in the last
presidential race, culminating in an improper act that may have inadvertently elected Donald Trump. Even at the time
Mr. Comey's FBI colleagues considered the intelligence, which indicated questionable actions by the Justice Department
to fix the Hillary email investigation, to be false, possibly a Russian plant.
FBI
Utilized Crack Addict Stefan Halper As Its Key Source to Spy Illegally on Trump Team in Its Attempted Coup of the President.
Investigative reports show that Stefan Halper was the spy working for the FBI in the Trump campaign. This big man and indicted
cocaine addict was who the FBI relied on in its attempted coup of the President of the United States.
Former
Senior Treasury Financial Crimes Official Pleads Guilty To Leaking Records of Cohen, Manafort, Gates, Butina and
More. CTH noted last year when John Fry, an intelligence analyst with the IRS's law enforcement arm, was
arrested that something more was happening in the background of his case and the DOJ case against Natalie
Sours-Edwards. Today Ms. Sours-Edwards pleads guilty to downloading & distributing the financial records of people
connected to the Trump orbit. You might remember back in May 2018 when sketchy porn lawyer Michael Avenetti was
releasing U.S. Treasury notifications on Michael Cohen received from an unknown source within the Treasury Department.
You might also remember when New Yorker's Ronan Farrow wrote a sympathetic article after talking to the leaking treasury
official. As a result the Treasury Inspector General began an investigation.
Christopher
Wray Isn't the Right Man to Fix the FBI. The nation's most powerful law enforcement agency is in shambles.
Following a series of internal investigations, in addition to extensive reporting on the misconduct of former top officials, the
Federal Bureau of Investigation is suffering a crisis in confidence from the very people it has a sworn duty to protect:
the American public. Considering its behavior over the past four years, one could be forgiven for thinking that the FBI
exists only to serve the interests of the political aristocracy. From the Clinton email server cover-up to the unfounded
counterintelligence probe into four Americans working for the Trump presidential campaign and the corruption of the Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Act, the FBI has exploited its power to defend partisan allies and punish foes.
Spy
Court Picks FISA Abuse Denier To Tackle FISA Abuse. The nation's top spy court appointed an Obama-era Justice
Department official who has denied and downplayed FBI surveillance abuse to assess the FBI's response to a scathing new
report cataloguing problems with how the agency secured authority to spy on a Donald Trump campaign affiliate. Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) presiding Judge James Boasberg appointed David Kris to review the FBI's proposed
changes to its surveillance application process even though he spent the past few years running interference for the FBI as
substantive criticism of the agency mounted.
Revealed:
Identity of top FBI official who leaked secret information to media. The name of a former top FBI official who
leaked sensitive information over the course of hundreds of communications with at least six reporters can be revealed by the
Washington Examiner. His identity is contained in a 21-page report obtained through a Freedom of Information Act
request. The report reveals that investigators for Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz determined
that Bryan Paarmann, 53, the deputy assistant director of the FBI's international operations division from 2016 to 2017,
"improperly disclosed court-sealed and law enforcement sensitive information to the media" in violation of FBI rules.
The incident is one Horowitz included as part of what his June 2018 report called the FBI's "culture of unauthorized media
contacts." A one-page summary of the investigation was released last May.
Attorney
General William Barr, 'Adult of the Year'. Few people in the country today have demonstrated deeper insight
into Spygate, the investigation into those who have been investigating the elected president of the United States, than
Kimberley Strassel. In her column I detected a genuine note of alarm. Is it possible that the investigation of
the investigators could be brought to an end? Could the media render Attorney General Barr or prosecutor John Durham
suspect? Will they uncover an incriminating telephone call? How long can the Democrat-controlled House mire these
men in one of their investigations? Is it possible that the whole finely-tuned investigation overseen by the attorney
general will come to a grinding halt because of Democratic subterfuge? Well, I do not think it is likely, but it is
possible. As Ms. Strassel writes, the evidence against the FBI has steadily accumulated.
Redeeming the
FBI. Due to the actions of a few, the overall trust of the American public, previously enjoyed by both agencies
is arguably at an all-time low. Tinfoil hat folks excepted, the general public has always extended the benefit of the
doubt to FBI agents in the performance of their duties. This deference was hard-earned by investigators and prosecutors
who made the thousands of prominent cases that forged the Bureau's reputation. The misuse of their positions has
already cost the malefactors their jobs. Whingeing over treatment at the hands of those that hurt their feelings only
brings further discredit to the organization that once employed them. [...] I understand that there will be a period of
mistrust that follows the clear breaches committed by a small percentage of the organization. Please don't let their
deeds permanently undermine your faith in the FBI.
It's
Statistically Impossible For The FBI's Spygate Errors To All Be Mistakes. [Scroll down] There's no way
the cards can all fall one way, no way every "mistake" can redound in support of the government's "case" against Page.
There's no statistical way every single oversight, clerical error, unchecked box, unread file, misplaced document, unread
email, uncorroborated assumption, unverified assertion, omission of exculpatory evidence, and inclusion of false allegations
can all fall against Page, and in favor of the FBI's goal of providing probable cause to convince the court to believe he was
an agent of a foreign power. There's no way 17 glaring omissions, mistakes, mischaracterizations, and straight-up lies
can make their way, undetected, unquestioned, and uncorrected, through the now-legendary labyrinth of supervisory coordination,
from line agents to Woods Procedures to FBI supervisors to DOJ reviewers to FBI counsel, FBI deputy director, FBI director,
DOJ general counsel, deputy attorney general, and attorney general certification.
Does
William Barr Have the Guts? The recent I.G. report on FISA abuse was just another in a very long line of
disappointing indicators that equal justice may never be restored to our nation. [...] Is this guy Barr for real? Is he
ready to face the hellfire that will be unleashed if he takes real steps to hold coup conspirators accountable? It's
looking increasingly likely that he is for real, but what remains to be seen how far he is willing to go. [...] The first
question to be answered is exactly how far Barr needs to take it. If you ask MAGA country, they're calling for heads up
to and including Obama's. This is doubtful and certainly not prudent because the political and systemic repercussions
would be devastating and permanently destabilizing for the USA. [...] Care must be taken to avoid the precedent of high-level
political war. Otherwise, we'll morph into a banana republic in less than a generation. Ultimately, justice needs
to be done, so a compromise must be made.
Col
Douglas Macgregor Has Suspicions About Pompeo, Esper and Milley. [W]e are not alone in our suspicions of
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Defense Secretary Mark Esper and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Mark Milley. Tonight
Col Douglas Macgregor outlines his own suspicions about the U.S. military attack in Iraq and Syria that parallel our initial
gut reaction. Macgregor states his belief that President Trump is being "skillfully misinformed".
[Video clip]
An
FBI Analyst Is Going to Prison for Illegal Email Hacking of a Political Enemy...to Protect Mueller. While U.S.
Attorney John Durham continues his criminal investigation into FISA abuse and other misconduct at the FBI, CIA, DIA and other
federal government intelligence agencies, one of Special Counsel Robert Mueller allies was just sentenced to prison.
Mark Tolson, a former FBI analyst, illegally accessed the emails of right wing activist Jack Burkman in order to protect
Mueller. He admitted to doing so in federal court last week. He will serve seven days behind bars and has been
ordered to pay a $500 fine. "I did what I did to try to protect Director Mueller, who can protect himself," Tolson told
U.S. District Court Judge Leonie Brinkema. After illegally sifting through emails, Tolson attempted to leak them to the press.
Dan
Bongino Explains Why the Unmaskings Left Little or No Paper Trail. Everytime I watch a Dan Bongino podcast, I
learn something new about Spygate. I hear information that I find nowhere else and I spend hours everyday
reading/watching the news. Recently, Bongino interviewed Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) whose investigative work,
particularly in 2018, (along with that of John Solomon and Bongino) did so much to uncover the activities of the FBI in 2016.
During the interview, Nunes said that, at a certain point during their investigation, he and his team began to track Bongino
because they couldn't believe the information he managed to obtain. Nunes said his team would receive classified
information and Bongino would be simultaneously telling his listeners the same thing. Anyway, recently the New York
Times reported that U.S. Attorney John Durham has turned his attention to former CIA Director John Brennan. Durham
has requested Brennan's communications records from the CIA and is said to be looking into various testimony he has
given — possibly searching for discrepancies.
FBI
Director Wray Responds to the FISA Court's Statement and Shows It's Time for Him to Go. Earlier today
[12/17/2019], the FISA court released an extremely rare public statement in which they addressed the findings of the recent
IG report. In it, they laid out the gravity of the misconduct, with the court taking issue with the lies and omissions
put upon them by the FBI. While there may be a bit of blame shifting here (the FISA court should have been more skeptical
from the jump), there's no doubt the lion's share of the issue was they were given incomplete and sometimes false information
to make judgements with. [...] Now, the FBI has responded via their own statement written by Directer Christopher Wray.
GOP
Sen. Hawley: The FBI Interfered in the 2016 Election. Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) on Thursday
appeared on "Fox & Friends" and reacted to the Department of Justice's inspector general report by Michael Horowitz. [...]
What's worse: is it worse to have a foreign government trying to interfere in our election or is it worse to
have our own government? Because that's what the FBI did," Hawley advised.
Our Elites
Don't See What's Coming. [Scroll down] This all leads us to a serious problem that we as a country are
facing: we've been losing trust in our institutions for quite some time. All that the last few years have done is
to reinforce that kind of thinking. Seriously. Ask yourself: Do you really trust the FBI? I don't.
With the recent reports from Michael Flynn's attorney, Sidney Powell, apparently senior FBI agents tampered with 302s, falsifying
information to get the results they wanted which had nothing to do with the truth. This was the FBI —
supposedly the world's greatest law enforcement agency. I don't think so. Until those senior officials go to
jail for their abuse of power my distrust of the FBI will continue. Do you really trust the Justice Department?
Maybe. I'll see what Attorney General Barr and John Durham pursue and actually accomplish. I can assure you,
however, if there are not prosecutions with jail time, scratch that institution off the list. The CIA?
Forget about it. Congress? You mean the inept worthless institution that sits on its hands and has ceded
massive control of the lawmaking function of government to the administrative state? I have to tell you:
is there really a point to Congress in its current form?
Mittens,
the Deep State, and the Ongoing Coup Against POTUS. Recently, one of my email pals sent me an incredible
opinion piece from Howell Woltz at The International Centre for Justice, in Warsaw, Poland. He is the author of
"Justice Denied: The United States vs. the People," a very interesting book about the US justice system and federal
prisons and the need for some serious reform. Occasionally, an opinion piece is so profound that it simply MUST be
disseminated to a much wider audience than a simple blog post. This is one of such article. In this commentary,
he opines on the DoJ/FBI cabal's ongoing coup against POTUS while explaining some key connections among John Brennan, Mitt
Romney, Cofer Black, Burisma Holdings (Ukraine), Bararck Obama, Hillary Clinton, and all the rest. It fills in a lot
of gaps and explains much about what is going on with respect to the Ukraine kerfuffle. While I can't vouch for the
veracity of all the claims here, this just rings true to me and connects a lot of very interesting dots. As usual, I
caution you to "trust but verify."
The
Only Way to Save the FBI Is to Expose Everything. The big news in what was a relatively big news day
[2/14/2019] was made by fired Acting Director of the FBI Andrew McCabe in snippets from a forthcoming interview on 60
Minutes. McCabe — the man who somehow couldn't recall what the words "insurance policy" referred to in one
of his texts — was promoting a new book he somehow managed to write despite his faulty memory. In the midst
of this, he confirmed what many of us long suspected — that he and other major officials (Rod Rosenstein, etc.) of
the FBI and the DOJ contemplated, even attempted to some degree, a coup d'état against the president of the United States.
The Gangster State. [Scroll down]
This becomes more obvious when looking at the whole criminal enterprise that is currently called the FBI. There's no question
that the people at the top engaged in a wide-ranging criminal conspiracy to spy on the Trump campaign and engineer a criminal
investigation of his administration, for the purpose of removing him from office. This is the one explanation that
explains the mountain of evidence piled up in the public domain. This is so obvious that no one bothers to deny
it. Instead, the game is to avoid discussing it in public. Lurking in the secret FBI files can be only three
possibilities, with regards to this conspiracy. One, there is proof they cooked the whole thing to help get Hillary
Clinton elected. The other is some out of left field explanation for the mountain of data, that points to an innocent
motive. The final option is a massive hole in the system where the damning proof used to exists, but has now been
destroyed as part of the cover-up. To date, the FBI and DOJ refuse to comply with Congressional subpoenas to answer
this question.
Federal
prosecutors interviewed multiple FBI officials for Russia probe review. Federal prosecutors who are looking
into the origins of the government's Russia probe have interviewed about two dozen people, suggesting that the inquiry is
further along than previously known, The New York Times reported Saturday [10/19/2019]. The prosecutors have asked
witnesses about whether former FBI officials that have been frequent targets of President Trump hold anti-Trump bias, former
officials and others familiar with the review told the Times. U.S. Attorney John Durham, who is leading the
investigation, has not interviewed all of the FBI officials who were instrumental in opening the Russia probe in 2016,
sources told the newspaper.
We've
lost sight of the real scandal. What will Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz's latest
investigation reveal? Will Congress hold hearings about it? Will former acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe
actually get indicted? After all, it's said that a motivated prosecutor can "indict a ham sandwich" if he really wants
to. We're so wrapped up in the daily tick-tock, we could be losing sight of a big picture that's come into focus over
the past two years. For the first time in our nation's history, an inspector general — one appointed by
President Obama — has determined that at least two men who sat in the top spot at the FBI committed multiple
violations that warrant possible prosecution. That in itself is a scandal with national implications deserving of
headlines, congressional hearings and promises to overhaul a broken system. Of course, the complicating factor in the
whole mess is that the government entities responsible for addressing any wrongdoing are the same ones inextricably tied to
the alleged wrongdoing.
Chris
Wray's FBI continues to cover for Team Comey's Russia shenanigans. The FBI is going to court to fight the
public release of a small number of documents the State Department sent to agents from Christopher Steele, the British
intelligence operative and Hillary Clinton-paid political muckraker, during the 2016 election. Normally, such Freedom
of Information Act cases don't merit public attention. This one does. To hear the FBI tell it, the release
of former Deputy Assistant Secretary Kathleen Kavalec's documents is tantamount to giving up the keys to President Trump's
nuclear briefcase, aiding the enemy or assisting terrorists.
Meadows:
'There's a Cover-up Within Certain Realms at the FBI'. Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), in an interview on
"Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo," touched on a wide range of issues including the investigation by Justice
Department (DOJ) Inspector General Michael Horowitz, the potential testimony before Congress of former special counsel Robert
Mueller, the release of new documents this week, and whether people in the FBI and DOJ will be held accountable. About
the investigation by Horowitz into alleged FISA abuse, Meadows said that he expects the report to be delayed. "Only
Michael Horowitz knows the exact timeframe of when it's coming out. Obviously, the attorney general had indicated that
he hoped to see it in June. I'm not as optimistic now. And one of the reasons for that is additional information
has been given to the inspector general for them to investigate," Meadows said.
Bruce Ohr and/or Nellie Ohr
This subsection has moved to a page of its own,
located here.
Roger Stone
This subsection has moved to a page of its own,
located here.
Michael Cohen
Deep
State IRS Employee John Fry Pleads Guilty to Leaking Michael Cohen's Bank Records to Avenatti. Deep State IRS
analyst John Fry pleaded guilty Wednesday [8/14/2019] to leaking Michael Cohen's bank records to creepy porn lawyer Michael
Avenatti and The New Yorker. Mr. Fry was charged in February of this year by the US Attorney's Office for the
Northern District of California with unauthorized disclosure of a suspicious activity report, or SAR. Banks file SARs
on any transactions that could be illegal.
IRS analyst pleads guilty to leaking Michael Cohen's financial
records. An Internal Revenue Service analyst pleaded guilty Wednesday [8/14/2019] to illegally disclosing
sensitive financial records about President Trump's former personal lawyer Michael Cohen, in a leak case stemming from the
Justice Department's investigations of those close to the president. John Fry, who had worked as an investigative
analyst with the IRS in San Francisco, entered his plea in federal court there. Fry was charged in February with the
unauthorized disclosure of suspicious activity reports, or SARs. Such reports are meant to flag potentially unlawful
financial conduct to government investigators but do not necessarily indicate wrongdoing.
Is
A Major Real Scandal About To Break Soon? The whole "Trump directed Cohen to lie to Congress" was essentially a
sub-hoax perpetuated by Buzzfeed. Despite Cohen's sensational testimony before Congress in an effort to
ingratiate himself to prosecutors, we found out that even this "bombshell" was nothing. Taken altogether, what we know
is that the entire Russian collusion story was nothing but a huge hoax foisted upon the American public, but one we should
all be worried about. What has become increasingly clear is that there was a story developed by a strange incestuous
group involving the media, the Clinton campaign, deep state Obama bureaucrats and the DNC to derail the Trump administration.
Michael
Cohen offers Democrats new evidence against Trump in bid to delay prison. President Trump's former personal
lawyer Michael Cohen says he has new information to offer Democrats if authorities reduce or delay his upcoming three-year
prison sentence. In a letter to lawmakers Thursday, Cohen's attorneys say he has discovered substantial files on a hard
drive that could help investigations of the president. The hard drive is said to include over 14 million files, which
consist of all emails, voice recordings, images and attachments from Cohen's computers and phones, his attorneys Lanny Davis,
Michael Monico and Carly Chocron wrote.
Records show FBI was probing
Michael Cohen long before raid. Special Counsel Robert Mueller began investigating President Donald Trump's
former lawyer, Michael Cohen, for fraud in his personal business dealings and for potentially acting as an unregistered
foreign agent at least nine months before FBI agents in New York raided his home and office, according to documents released
Tuesday [3/19/2019].
Have the Democrats
finally gone too far? Did Democrats overreach when they invited convicted liar and turncoat scammer Michael
Cohen to tell Congress President Trump is a bad guy? Are they on a ridiculous fishing expedition when they summon 81 people,
including three of the president's children, to testify to a congressional panel whose chairman says he's certain Trump committed
crimes, no matter what special counsel Robert Mueller says? Have they lost their minds with plans for a single-payer health
system, the Green New Deal, unrestricted abortion, open borders and endless free stuff?
Tripwire:
Adam Schiff Staff Coached Michael Cohen Four Times, Over Ten Hours, Prior to Testimony. Nothing is organic;
everything is planned; this is simply what the Democrats do every single time. They use the same playbook. Adding
further evidence toward this insufferable scheme, reports are now surfacing that HPSCI Chairman Adam Schiff dispatched his
staff members to coach Michael Cohen on his testimony on four occasions (in New York), prior to his congressional appearance,
totaling more than 10 hours. Again, everything is rehearsed and scripted. These latest developments explain
why the Cohen testimony was delayed. Political democrat operatives, working with Cohen's handler Lanny Davis, worked
through a training and coaching process for maximum effect. This coordinated process is also why Cohen was given a
deferment to the beginning of his prison sentence.
Cohen
met with Schiff staff for over 10 hours before House Oversight Committee hearing, sources say. President
Trump's former personal attorney Michael Cohen told House investigators this week that staff for Intelligence Committee
Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., traveled to New York at least four times to meet with him for over 10 hours immediately
before last month's high-profile public testimony, according to two sources familiar with the matter — as
Republicans question whether the meetings amounted to coaching a witness. The sources said the sessions covered a slew
of topics addressed during the public hearing before the oversight committee — including the National Enquirer's
"Catch and Kill" policy, American Media CEO David Pecker and the alleged undervaluing of President Trump's assets. But,
Republicans have raised concerns with the sessions, with Ohio Rep. Mike Turner sending a letter to Cohen's team on
Wednesday demanding answers.
Cohen
inquired about pardon from Trump, his lawyer says, contradicting testimony to Congress. A lawyer representing
former Trump attorney Michael Cohen said Wednesday that Cohen directed a lawyer last year to inquire about possibly receiving
a pardon from President Trump. The disclosure by Lanny Davis, first reported by the Wall Street Journal, contradicted
testimony by Cohen last week on Capitol Hill, in which Cohen told members of the House Oversight and Reform Committee:
"I have never asked for, nor would I accept, a pardon from Mr. Trump." In a written statement, Davis said Cohen
"directed his attorney" to ask about a possible pardon. The newspaper adds that it previously reported that Stephen
Ryan, a past attorney for Cohen, discussed a pardon with President Trump's lawyers in the weeks after FBI agents raided
Cohen's home, office and hotel room.
Michael
Cohen won't make a dime on [a] book full of his House testimony. A Michael Cohen instant book in his own words
hit Tuesday — but the fixer-turned-President Trump-antagonist will reap no gain. Diversion Books said it
crashed "Cohen's House Testimony: The Complete Transcripts and Case Documents" for March 5 publication —
only five days after Cohen delivered his riveting public testimony on Capitol Hill. "For us, it seemed like an important
historic moment that will have big demand no matter what you think about Cohen," said Diversion CEO Scott Waxman. No
advance money will be paid to Cohen or any of his congressional interrogators for the book.
Remember:
Michael Cohen is a liar. Michael Cohen is, to remind everyone, a convicted liar. He lied to the very body
before which he is testifying this week. He did it early, often, and with great panache while employed by Donald
Trump — and in many cases was employed to serve that very function. Many in the press rightly spent months,
if not years, accusing Cohen of the very thing we now insist (again rightly), that our vaunted justice system proved true:
that he lies. But mark my words, few in the media will bring the same skepticism to what he said last week about Trump
before Congress. Many will believe every word as proof the president is a criminal. But why? Why is Cohen
suddenly believable?
Trump
says Cohen's newly revealed book proposal blows up testimony: 'Totally discredited!' President Trump on Friday [3/1/2019]
blasted Michael Cohen over a newly reported book proposal that apparently painted the president in a positive light, saying his former
lawyer's pitch contradicts this week's congressional testimony and renders him "totally discredited." "Wow, just revealed that
Michael Cohen wrote 'a love letter to Trump' manuscript for a new book that he was pushing. Written and submitted long after
Charlottesville and Helsinki, his phony reasons for going rogue. Book is exact opposite of his fake testimony, which is now
a lie!" Trump tweeted Friday [3/1/2019].
Michael
Cohen's Lying Circus: A Dispassionate Review. Tragically, notwithstanding recent efforts at raising
public awareness of the scourge of toxic imbecility, the spread of this debilitating disease has intensified, especially in
the minds of those whose symptoms are manifested in Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS). Nowhere is this acceleration of the
outbreak on clearer display than in the Left's rave reviews for the debut of the off-Broadway show trial, "Michael Cohen's
Lying Circus," which will be playing a limited engagement in select venues in our nation's capital.
Michael
Cohen demolishes the Russia collusion conspiracy — Will anyone be fired for lies? Michael Cohen
spent a decade as Trump's high-profile lobbyer, toady, defender and personal attorney. And then one day, he decided
that he hated Donald Trump and became Donald Trump's mortal enemy. A big change. How did that happen? Well,
Cohen told Congress this week that he had a kind of a road to Damascus experience. He was personally and morally
offended by what his boss said on two occasions. First, after the "Unite the Right" rally in Charlottesville, that was
the summer of 2017 and later, when he watched Trump's meeting with Vladimir Putin in Helsinki, Finland about a year later.
Those two scandals, both of them fraudulent, entirely manufactured by the left and its servants in the media, changed Michael
Cohen's mind forever.
Lynne
Patton: "Michael Cohen turned on the President because Mueller threatened to throw his wife in jail for up to 30
years". The appearance of long-time Trump confidante Lynne Patton at the congressional testimony of former
Trump lawyer Michael Cohen created a considerable stir amid Washington DC. However, the context of her appearance
takes on even more drama when considered against Patton's Facebook post from January 18th of this year: [...]
Heir
to infamous mob family predicts 'rat' Michael Cohen might have big problems in prison. Once President Donald
Trump's disgraced former attorney Michael Cohen reports to prison in May to serve a 3-year-old sentence for campaign finance
violations and tax evasion, among other charges, he may be in store for some painfully deep trouble, according to Giovanni
Gambino. Speaking with the Daily Mail early Wednesday morning, a few short hours before Cohen testified publicly to the
House Oversight Committee about the president and his alleged crimes, the Gambino crime family heir warned that prison
inmates hate "rats."
Why
1 simple lie by Michael Cohen could invalidate his entire testimony. In order for Michael Cohen to be seen as a
credible and reliable source on Donald Trump's business dealings, political activities and character — both in and
out of the White House — the President's former fixer must be viewed as a changed man, someone who lied, yes, but
has now seen the light and spent his House hearing on Tuesday [2/26/2019] telling the truth and nothing but the truth about his
former boss. Under that narrative, Cohen was ONCE a liar — to protect Trump — but the scales have
fallen from his eyes and now he is on the side of facts and truth.
Where
Is House Ethics Probe into Adam Schiff? During his grudge-airing, redemption-seeking spectacle on Wednesday [2/27/2019],
Michael Cohen admitted he was in cahoots with Democratic lawmakers prior to giving his congressional testimony. "We spoke
with Chairman [Elijah] Cummings and the [Democratic] Party," Trump's former lawyer confessed to Representative Jody Hice (R-Ga.).
"We spoke with Chairman [Adam] Schiff and his people as well." Under further questioning by Rep. James Jordan (R-Ohio),
Cohen acknowledged he "spoke to Mr. Schiff about topics that were going to be raised at the upcoming hearing." Jordan
clarified that rather than simply discuss the logistics of the hearing, Schiff coached the witness on "what [he was] going to talk about."
Latest
Hoaxer Michael Cohen Given 7-Hour Congressional Floor. A Trump-hating Congress needed to bring their visceral
hatred to an all-time high crescendo. Hoaxer Jussie Smollett tried but got caught in the act by Chicago cops, so working
with Hillary Clinton's former lawyer Lanny Davis, Congress brought in Michael Cohen. Cohen's hoax lasted for seven hours,
during which Georgia Congressman Jody Hice said of his testimony: "It's a shameful mockery". You won't see this
video anywhere on the mainstream or social media today. [Video clip]
Michael
Cohen Hearing Marks the End of Government 'Oversight'. Michael Cohen's testimony before the House Oversight
Committee hearing on Wednesday yielded very little in terms of new information about alleged misconduct by President Donald
Trump or his 2016 presidential campaign. If anything, Cohen's testimony hurt the case against the president.
Cohen said that he had no direct evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government. He also
appeared to lie several times (again). The media, too, lost. They billed Cohen's appearance as a climactic
moment — then struggled to salvage bits and pieces of their shattered narratives from the wreckage of his
testimony. Cohen told the committee that Trump had not actually told him directly to lie to Congress. He also
admitted there was no evidence, other than the word of a convicted liar (himself), that Trump had ever directed that "hush
money" be paid to Stormy Daniels and others.
Michael Cohen's Traveling
Mendacity Show. Michael Cohen is back in town and, as expected, put on a Pecksniffian public performance
Wednesday [2/27/2019] for an appreciative audience consisting of Democrats, the media, and miscellaneous TDS sufferers.
Assisted by that preeminent paragon of veracity, Lanny Davis, he pitched several patent specifics of his own invention that
he offered as a remedy for the dread disease that has ravaged the Beltway for two years — the Trump Presidency.
Cohen peddled his special swamp juice with the same pious solemnity with which he perjured himself before Congress about an
aborted Moscow real estate deal involving Trump and his construction company.
Michael
Cohen's Morality Play. "This is a story of redemption." That's how Democratic Rep. Carolyn Maloney
characterized the testimony Donald Trump's longtime attorney, Michael Cohen, delivered before the House Oversight Committee
on Wednesday. The president's former fixer couldn't have asked for more. Cohen has been throwing himself upon the
mercy of The Resistance ever since it became clear that he would face criminal charges related to his personal misconduct.
To avoid an excessive sentence, Cohen had to share with federal prosecutors all he knew about the president. But in
turning on his former employer and the party he leads, Cohen sacrificed his relationships on the right. He needed a
new set of friends, to say nothing of donors to his legal defense fund. And so Trump's attorney has embarked on a
nakedly cynical campaign of emotional manipulation stimulating all the anti-Trump left's pleasure centers.
Michael
Cohen Admits to Coordinating Scripted Testimony With Lanny Davis, Adam Schiff and Elijah Cummings. Those who
follow closely will note Speaker Pelosi's plan to weaponize congressional oversight is a carefully orchestrated campaign with
three key figures: Adam Schiff, Elijah Cummings and Jerry Nadler. Representative Jody Hice questions Michael
Cohen about the construct and background of his congressional appearance. Within the answer Cohen admits his handler,
democrat operative Lanny Davis, coordinated with key congressional leadership to include Oversight Chairman Elijah Cummings
and HPSCI Chairman Adam Schiff. [Video clip]
The
Three Times When Michael Cohen's Testimony Accidentally Exonerated President Trump. Because attorney-client
privilege is apparently no longer a thing, Michael Cohen, President Trump's former lawyer, is on Capitol Hill this week
testifying against his old employer. The media tells us that his testimony is like a carpet bomb on the Trump
Administration, full of explosive and damning revelations that will surely spell doom for the President. Something
closer to the opposite is the case, I think.
Michael
Cohen Admits Discussing 'Topics' with Adam Schiff Before Testimony. Michael Cohen, former personal attorney to
President Donald Trump, admitted that he discussed with Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) "topics that might come up" in preparation
for his Wednesday [2/27/2019] hearing before the House Oversight Committee. "I spoke to Mr. Schiff about topics
that were going to be raised at the upcoming hearing," Cohen told Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) when pressed about the pair's
past discussion. "Whoa," Jordan responded. "Not just what time you're going to show up, but what you're going to
talk about? Whoa."
GOP
reps refer Michael Cohen to DOJ for alleged perjury during hearing. House Oversight Committee Republicans on
Thursday referred ex-Trump attorney Michael Cohen to the Justice Department for alleged perjury, claiming he lied during
sworn testimony before the panel a day earlier about a number of issues including his ambitions to work in the Trump
administration and contracts with foreign entities. Committee Ranking Member Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, and Rep. Mark
Meadows, R-N.C., penned a letter Thursday [2/28/2019] to newly sworn-in Attorney General William Barr, citing evidence
that Cohen "committed perjury" during his hearing before the committee on Wednesday.
Cohen Admits He Can't
Corroborate His Allegations Against Trump. President Donald Trump's former attorney Michael Cohen admitted
Wednesday [2/27/2019] he is unable to corroborate allegations that the president discussed elements of WikiLeaks' email hacks
with Roger Stone. "How can we corroborate what you're saying?" Democratic Rep. Deborah Wasserman Schultz of
Florida asked Cohen, referring to the former Trump confidant's allegations that the president was aware of Stone's contact
with WikiLeaks' founder Julian Assange. She is among a slew of Democrats and Republicans grilling Cohen during a
congressional hearing. "I don't know, but I suspect the special counsel's office and other government agencies have
the information that you're seeking," Cohen said in reply.
Cohen
admits he has no evidence Trump colluded with Russians, 'but I have my suspicions'. President Trump's former
attorney Michael Cohen said Wednesday that he has no evidence suggesting his former boss colluded with Russia during the 2016
presidential election, but that he has his "suspicions." "Questions have been raised about whether I know of direct
evidence that Mr. Trump or his campaign colluded with Russia. I do not, and I want to be clear. But I have
my suspicions," Cohen told lawmakers. There are "so many dots that all seem to lead" in the direction of Russian
President Vladimir Putin, he added.
On
the eve of congressional testimony, Michael Cohen disbarred for lying to Congress. Michael Cohen, the former
longtime personal attorney of President Trump, was officially disbarred Tuesday [2/26/2019]. A panel of five justices at
the New York Supreme Court ruled that Cohen had ceased to be an attorney when he was convicted in federal court in November
2018 of making false statements to Congress. The judicial panel ruled that Cohen "ceased to be an attorney upon his
federal conviction of making false statements to the United States Congress." Back in August 2018, President Trump
tweeted: "If anyone is looking for a good lawyer, I would strongly suggest that you don't retain the services of
Michael Cohen!" Today, the justices said that Cohen's name would be "stricken from the roll of attorneys and
counselors-at-law in the State of New York."
Cohen
Slapped With Criminal Referral Mid-Testimony Over FARA Violation. Former Trump attorney Michael Cohen was hit
with a criminal referral for violating the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) by Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC) following
a heated exchange during Cohen's Wednesday testimony in front of the House Oversight Committee.
Michael
Cohen Opening Statement, Worded for Maximum Political Damage. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has worked closely
with House Oversight Chairman Elijah Cummings to use President Trump's former lawyer Michael Cohen as the cornerstone to a
carefully planned democrat impeachment effort. Working collaboratively with the current U.S. Department of Justice,
Speaker Pelosi organized a deferment of prison sentence for Mr. Cohen so he could testify to the House committees. [...]
The 20 pages of toxic and disparaging opening remarks are specifically and carefully worded by Cohen and his political
handler Lanny Davis to create maximum political damage. Together with personal documents (and recordings) Cohen will
provide, this pre-planned effort is what U.S. media will use to assist their ideological allies in congress.
Michael
Cohen Plans to Call Trump a 'Con Man' and a 'Cheat' in Congressional Testimony. Michael D. Cohen plans to tell
Congress on Wednesday [2/27/2019] that President Trump is a "con man" and a "cheat" who knew a longtime adviser was communicating with
WikiLeaks — and who implicitly instructed Mr. Cohen to lie about a Trump Tower project in Moscow that was underway during
the 2016 presidential campaign. The extraordinary testimony will take place when Mr. Cohen, the president's former lawyer and
fixer, publicly appears before the House Oversight and Reform Committee. An advance copy of Mr. Cohen's testimony was obtained
Tuesday night by reporters at multiple news organizations, including The New York Times, just as Mr. Trump began meetings in Vietnam
before convening with the North Korean leader, Kim Jong-un.
Get
Trump! Democrats, Media Go All In On Michael Cohen. The major broadcast television networks will air live
coverage Wednesday of the Democrat-led House Committee on Oversight and Reform hearing with former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen
who has turned on his former client since being targeted by federal prosecutors. The cable news networks will also
carry the hearing live in which Cohen will reportedly say of President Trump, "He is a racist. He is a conman. He
is a cheat."
Cohen
hearings [are] designed to keep [the] public in [the] dark about Russia. Former Trump lawyer and fixer Michael
Cohen is scheduled to appear before three congressional committees this week before he heads to jail to serve a sentence for
tax evasion and lying to Congress. [...] It would be a great service if the Cohen appearances helped increase the store of
public information on the Trump-Russia furor. But even though Cohen is a key figure in the matter — his name
is mentioned 24 times in the so-called Trump dossier — the hearings appear designed to prevent the
public from learning anything new about the Russia matter.
Michael
Cohen Disbarred Following Felony Conviction For Lying Under Oath. Donald Trump's former-attorney-turned rat has
been disbarred, reported the New York Post. [...] According to the law, any lawyer "who shall be convicted of a felony ...
shall upon such conviction, cease to be an attorney and counsellor-at-law, or to be competent to practice law as such."
Mr. Cohen can file for reinstatement in seven years — or sooner if he were to be pardoned (not going to
happen). Michael Cohen was sentenced to 36 months in prison for lying to Congress and other charges related
to his taxi medallion company in December and will report to prison on May 6th.
Cell signal puts
Cohen outside Prague around time of purported Russian meeting. A mobile phone traced to President Donald
Trump's former lawyer and "fixer" Michael Cohen briefly sent signals ricocheting off cell towers in the Prague area in late
summer 2016, at the height of the presidential campaign, leaving an electronic record to support claims that Cohen met
secretly there with Russian officials, four people with knowledge of the matter say. During the same period of late
August or early September, electronic eavesdropping by an Eastern European intelligence agency picked up a conversation
among Russians, one of whom remarked that Cohen was in Prague, two people familiar with the incident said.
Rebuttal:
Same
Sketchy Journalists Claim Again Michael Cohen in Prague Story. McClatchy journalists Peter Stone and Greg
Gordon are once again attempting to prop-up the most disproven allegation in the Chris Steele/Nellie Ohr dossier about
Michael Cohen making a trip to Prague. They appear to stir this false story approximately every six months. This
iteration is framed around cell-phone tower pings. Michael Cohen has denied the claim for years. Cohen's lawyer,
Lanny Davis, has clearly denied the claim. The special counsel has reviewed and walked away from the claim.
The Washington Post spent months trying to substantiate the claim, and could find no evidence. According to WaPo
reporter Greg Miller, the CIA and FBI have refuted the claim. It simply did not happen.
Beyond rebuttal:
Michael Cohen Report
Is Based On Third-Hand Information, Reporter Reveals. The reporters who broke a potentially bombshell story
claiming evidence that Michael Cohen visited Prague during the 2016 presidential campaign did not see for themselves some of
the underlying intelligence cited in their report, one of the journalists who wrote the story revealed Thursday [12/27/2018].
In an interview on MSNBC, Greg Gordon said that he and his McClatchy colleague, Peter Stone, did not physically see cell tower
records and intelligence intercepts that they claim placed Cohen in Prague in summer 2016. Gordon also suggested that the
four anonymous sources he and Stone cite in their article also did not see the intelligence for themselves, meaning that the
report is based on third-hand information.
More:
McClatchy
News Beclowns Themselves With Michael Cohen Sourcing. After claiming to have proprietary information that Michael Cohen
visited Prague, McClatchy News reporter Greg Gordon appeared on MSNBC to share the origin of the story. Not only did the reporters
who wrote the article not see the evidence, the sources they used for the claim that Cohen visited Prague also did not see the
evidence. Apparently, a person told another person, who then told Greg Gordon and Peter Stone what the 3rd hand person
told them. That's the sourcing for the claim that Michael Cohen's cell phone was in Prague.
Why
Did Michael Cohen Plead Guilty to Campaign Finance Crimes That Aren't Campaign Finance Crimes? On Wednesday
[12/12/2018], a district court judge in Manhattan accepted Michael Cohen's guilty plea to political crimes and sentenced him
to three years in the American gulag. But if the two campaign finance crimes to which he pleaded guilty are not really
crimes, why did he plead guilty to them? And what precedents does this case establish that can be used against
political enemies in the future?
Representative
Elijah Cummings Outlines Democrat Plan to Remove President Trump via Michael Cohen. It was curious to see
Michael Cohen walk out of his sentencing hearing last week without having to report to jail/prison for the punishment
therein. [...] In the prosecutorial agreement within the Cohen case, there obviously remains the fulfillment of terms.
Michael Cohen doesn't report to prison until March 6th, 2019. Why the exceptional judicial delay and generosity?
Michael
Cohen's farewell interview was an embarrassment. When you've admitted to years of lying, running a shady taxi
medallion scheme, and other deceptions, there's not much left to do other than go far, far away and hope the public
forgets. Cohen instead went on ABC's "Good Morning America" to look pathetic. [...] Cohen had misled Congress about the
timeline of a failed business deal he pursued in Russia on behalf of the Trump Organization (putting us the closest we've
come so far to demonstrating any meaningful connection between President Trump and the Kremlin). For that, he was
given a paltry two months in prison, which were to be served concurrent with the rest of his time. So, he effectively
got no time for that one. There is no way to make this not look bad for Cohen, though he put his heart into trying.
Robert
Mueller's case against Michael Cohen has very little to do with Trump or campaign finance violations. President
Trump and the 2016 campaign amount to a footnote in Special Counsel Robert Mueller's sentence filings on Michael Cohen,
despite the news media's heavily overstated narrative that the whole thing is about to blow the lid on a White House
"felony." The documents are almost exclusively an indictment of Cohen as a tax evader and serial liar. The link
to Trump, or of any allegation of wrongdoing on his behalf, has nowhere near the clarity liberals want you to believe.
Cohen
lied, broke the law and used Trump to get rich — and now blames Trump for his troubles. In his
federal court sentencing hearing Wednesday, President Trump's former personal attorney Michael Cohen cut a tragic figure of
his own making as he tried to convince a judge to spare him from prison for a host of crimes ranging from tax fraud to bank
fraud to lying to Congress. He claimed he was a trusting soul undone by the ambition and the machinations of an evil
man — Donald Trump. It played out like a modern take on the Tennessee Williams play "A Streetcar Named Desire."
Larry
O'Connor: Michael Cohen Sentencing 'Is Nothing But a Power Grab' to Get Rid of Trump. While filling in
for radio host Mark Levin on his nationally syndicated radio talk show, "The Mark Levin Show," on Wednesday night [12/12/2018], WMAL radio
host Larry O'Connor, who also has his own show, "The Larry O'Connor Show," said that the sentencing of Michael Cohen, the former
attorney of President Donald Trump, was "nothing but a power grab" to get rid of President Trump. "This is really a power
grab from the Southern District of New York," Larry O'Connor said. "Yes, the intention is to get rid of President Trump,
but, also, let's face it, if you believe and agree and love the separation of powers as articulated in our U.S. Constitution,
this is nothing but a power grab."
Cohen's
pleas concocted by prosecutors to snare Trump. I'm experiencing 1998 déjà vu as prosecutors once
again work overtime to turn extramarital affairs and the efforts to keep them secret into impeachable high crimes and misdemeanors.
Unable to get the witnesses to compose the stories they want, today's prosecutors are discovering they can simply compose the crimes by
manipulating the pleas of men desperate to protect their families. The Michael Cohen sentencing memo took aim directly at both Cohen
and President Donald Trump. It was used, unethically, to cast the president as directing a criminal conspiracy to make "secret and
illegal" payments. Sentencing memos are not supposed to use secret grand jury info to point fingers at those who are not being
sentenced, but that's exactly what these did.
Defeat
and the Dossier Explain Everything. Donald Trump's former consiglieri Michael Cohen, along with being charged
with tax avoidance and improper business deals, allegedly is guilty also of trying to leverage money and attention by
exaggerating his influence with candidate and later President Trump. In other words, Cohen to spec followed the
standard creepy daily fare for Washington and New York wannabe fixers. But did we need Robert Mueller's 18 months and
$40 million to uncover and redirect to federal attorneys what was largely self-evident? Could not the U.S. government
long ago, without the prompt of a special counsel, have uncovered that Michael Cohen did not fully pay his taxes —
in the manner of an Al Sharpton, Timothy Geithner, and Tom Daschle?
Why
Trump is likely to be indicted by Manhattan US Attorney. The major takeaway from the 40-page sentencing memorandum
filed by federal prosecutors Friday [12/7/2018] for Michael Cohen, President Trump's former personal attorney, is this:
The president is very likely to be indicted on a charge of violating federal campaign finance laws. It has been obvious
for some time that President Trump is the principal subject of the investigation still being conducted by the U.S. attorney
for the Southern District of New York. Cohen earlier pleaded guilty to multiple counts of business and tax fraud,
violating campaign finance law, and making false statements to Congress regarding unsuccessful efforts to build a Trump Tower
in Moscow.
New
Poll: Half of Voters Don't Believe Mueller Has Anything on Trump. Robert Mueller's Special Counsel
investigation is reportedly heating up again, with a number of reports indicating he's finally getting ready to conclude
nearly two years of work on the 2016 presidential election. Last week President Trump's longtime personal attorney,
Michael Cohen, pleaded guilty to lying during congressional testimony. This is the second plea deal for Cohen after he
pleaded guilty to tax fraud and campaign finance violations in August. In addition, Mueller's office announced former
Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort violated terms of his plea agreement. But according to half of Americans watching
this saga play out, Mueller doesn't seem to have any evidence to bring charges against President Trump.
For
Trump, Cohen Plea Deal's Beginning to Look a Lot Like Exoneration. Contrary to media speculation that Robert
Mueller is closing in on President Trump, the special prosecutor's plea deal with Trump's personal lawyer Michael Cohen
offers further evidence that the Trump campaign did not collude with Russians during the 2016 election, according to
congressional investigators and former prosecutors.
Where's the Beef, Mueller?
The Mueller investigation remains a "collusion" probe without any collusion. For all of the media's heavy breathing
about Thursday's news of a Michael Cohen guilty plea, it doesn't get Mueller any closer to the stated goal of his
investigation. On CNN, where its programming is an endless game of anti-Trump gotcha, Jeff Zucker's puppets recited his
mandated talking point that Trump's fixer "may" have "broken" everything, blah, blah, blah. But the very conjectural
character of this feverish chatter indicated the hollowness of the story. If the plea contained any evidence of
collusion, the Hillary donors who make up much of Mueller's staff would surely have leaked it to CNN by now.
Does Mueller Have
an October Surprise? The investigation that was ostensibly initiated to ascertain if the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians
to affect the 2016 election has been ongoing for twenty-seven months. Seventeen months of which have been in the hands of Special Counsel
Robert Mueller and his Democrat phalanx of investigators and prosecutors spending in excess of $1.4 million a month.) This prolonged
inquisition has produced no evidence or indictments supporting the collusion allegation. Yet the investigation marches on with no end
in sight. [...] Based on his insistence that Trump testify in what is obviously a perjury trap, the innumerable leaks emanating from
Mueller's office, the conviction of Paul Manafort on unrelated charges and the coerced guilty plea by Michael Cohen again on unrelated charges,
Robert Mueller appears to have a much greater animus toward Donald Trump than Lawrence Walsh toward Ronald Reagan or George Bush.
Michael Cohen's lawyer has done real damage to the case against
Trump. One of the most bizarre aspects of the investigations engulfing the Trump administration is the lawyers
involved. Here we have a presidency on the line, and this is Trump's team? The top legal spokesmen for each side
are ... Rudolph W. Giuliani and Lanny Davis!? Up until this point, though, Giuliani was the Great Contradictor and Davis
was merely a colorful character. Now that has changed in a big way. In a new interview with The Washington Post's Tom
Hamburger and Rosalind S. Helderman, Davis is backing off two massive claims he made in recent weeks, including that former
Trump lawyer Michael Cohen has told people he witnessed President Trump being informed of Donald Trump Jr.'s 2016 Trump Tower
meeting with a Russian lawyer before it happened.
Michael
Cohen, the Rabbit in Robert Mueller's Hat. People are wondering why Cohen waited so long before turning up
at CNN with scratchy audio recordings he claims to have secretly recorded on former, unsuspecting client Donald J.
Trump. It's the Midterms that kept Mike The Rabbit waiting so long. Michael Cohen's testimony is Mueller's
Special Counsel's last chance to keep the Russians-stole-the-election conspiracy alive in order to get more Democrats
returned to power in Midterms, and to keep investigations going all the way through to 2020 presidential elections.
Trump
won't lose supporters over Manafort, Cohen — despite what liberal media are spewing. The liberal
media suggest that President Trump is on a sinking ship and will be soon be losing the support of a large number of his
followers — the group Hillary Clinton dismissively described as "a basket full of deplorables." Don't believe
it. The conviction Tuesday of former Trump presidential campaign chairman Paul Manafort on tax and bank fraud
charges — and the guilty plea that Trump's former personal lawyer Michael Cohen entered the same day to charges of
violating federal campaign finance laws, tax evasion and making a false statement to a bank — won't shake support
for Trump among the millions of Americans who voted for him and appreciate his many accomplishments in office.
Trump
legal team makes case to prosecute Comey, others for lying after Cohen guilty plea. Former and current members
of President Trump's legal team have compiled research to make the case that former FBI Director James B. Comey misled
Congress in his testimony and is not a reliable witness for special counsel Robert Mueller. The lawyers last year tried
to persuade Mr. Mueller to investigate Mr. Comey, his former colleague, to no avail. The Trump-Comey war took
on new dimensions last week as Mr. Mueller won a guilty plea from former Trump attorney Michael Cohen, who admitted to
lying to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence about a proposed election-year Trump Organization Moscow hotel deal.
Why
is Michael Cohen prosecuted when Hillary Clinton, Eric Holder and Lois Lerner were not? With a Republican
president in place and soon-to-be Democrat-run House, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has conveniently remembered that they
have the ability to prosecute people who lie to Congress. This was a power they had inexplicably forgotten about during
the 10 years that Democrats were benefiting from witnesses who lied. No doubt there should be consequences and
accountability if you testify to Congress under oath and blatantly lie or violate the law. But the DOJ seems to have
different standards based on which party's political fortunes will be impacted. It is this unequal application of
justice that is dividing the country and threatens peace. Michael Cohen, Donald Trump's former attorney, struck a plea
deal with the DOJ for lying to Congress. But what about all the other egregious cases of misconduct interacting with
Congress? Why weren't those pursued or prosecuted?
Another
nothing-burger? Catherine Herridge breaks down Michael Cohen's guilty plea 'bombshell'. Early Thursday
morning word broke that President Donald Trump's former personal lawyer Michael Cohen had pleaded guilty to lying to Congress
during its investigation into possible Russian collusion. Following the announcement, the perpetually hysterical left
broke into cheers of gleeful applause over the belief that the president would soon be the next one to be indicted.
Another
Turbulent Week with Some Big Mysteries. The Special Counsel keeps rolling with indictments that have nothing to
do with the original charge — certainly because the only collusion with Russia was by Hillary. Each time the
anti-Trumpers are certain the President's end is nigh. This week's indictment of [Michael] Cohen is of a piece with
that history.
On
Hush Money, the President's Best Defense Is Lack of Criminal Intent. You can be forgiven if you've forgotten
there even is a Mueller investigation. Just a week ago, the country was on tenterhooks as the jury in Paul Manafort's
trial headed into the weekend without having reached a verdict. Would they hang? Had Special Counsel Robert
Mueller overreached? Did federal judge T. S. Ellis of the Eastern District of Virginia undermine the prosecutors?
Such is the permanent frenzy of the Trump news cycle that, even with Tuesday's convictions, Manafort and Mueller seem like
old news. They've been superseded by Michael Cohen's guilty plea; specifically, by the fallout of Cohen's having
implicated the president in felony campaign-finance offenses during his allocution in Manhattan federal court late Tuesday
afternoon — an otherworldly media moment, simultaneous with the jury verdict in Manafort's trial 200 miles south.
Mueller
Cannot Have Credibility If He Ignores Hillary's Crimes. This investigation is absent of all credibility because
it specifically ignores what happened on the Hillary side! Without what happened on the Hillary side, they would not
have an investigation of Trump. That's why! There is a dossier — and, by the way, do you know why
Cohen's caught up in this? The dossier mentions Cohen! The dossier, this phony, unprovable piece of Hillary
Clinton opposition research also mentions Cohen. That's how he gets lassoed into this.
War of Attrition
Against President Trump. Precisely how does Bill Clinton's main legal fixer turn up as Michael Cohen's attorney
in a plea bargain with a special prosecutor? If you put that kind of plot line in a political thriller, the public
would laugh you off the newsstand book racks. Nonetheless, we now have Lanny Davis, special counsel to the president
for Bill Clinton during 1996-1998, declaring to CNN: "It's my observation that Mr. Cohen has knowledge that would
be of interest to the special counsel about the issue of whether Donald Trump, ahead of time, knew about the hacking of
emails, which is a computer crime." On Tuesday [8/21/2018] Davis told MSNBC that Cohen knew about "the possibility of
a conspiracy to collude and corrupt the American democracy system in the 2016 election."
Cohen
Attorney Lanny Davis Is Registered Foreign Agent for Pro-Russian Oligarch Wanted by US Government and Linked to Putin.
On Tuesday [8/21/2018] former Trump Attorney Michael Cohen, on the advice of his attorney and Clinton advisor Lanny Davis, surrendered
himself to the FBI after it was reported he reached a plea deal with federal prosecutors. [...] Cohen attorney Lanny Davis is a
registered foreign agent for Dmytro Firtash, a pro-Russia Ukrainian oligarch wanted by the US government.
Dershowitz:
Candidate Entitled To Pay Hush Money, Committed No Election Crime. Alan Dershowitz said the only campaign
violation that could have happened is if former Trump attorney Michael Cohen did break a campaign finance law on his own
volution and called the situation a "Catch-22" on MSNBC this afternoon [8/22/2018].
Cohen Attorney Backtracks
On Claim That Trump Had Advance Knowledge of Russian Hacking. Lanny Davis, an attorney for Michael Cohen, is
backtracking from his stunning claim that President Donald Trump had advance knowledge of Russian hacking efforts.
During interviews on Tuesday [8/21/2018] and Wednesday, Davis laid out a grave allegation against Trump, saying that Cohen had
information that would be of interest to special counsel Robert Mueller, including about Russian hacking of Democrats' emails.
In an interview Tuesday with MSNBC's Rachel Maddow, Davis said Cohen, a former lawyer for Trump, has "knowledge about the
computer crime of hacking and whether or not Mr. Trump knew ahead of time about that crime and even cheered it on."
Lanny Davis: Michael
Cohen Never Went To Prague As Steele Dossier Claims. Lanny Davis, the Clinton-connected attorney for Michael
Cohen, said Wednesday [8/22/2018] that the former Trump lawyer had never been to Prague, as the infamous Steele dossier
alleges. "Thirteen references to Mr. Cohen are false in the dossier, but he has never been to Prague in his life,"
Davis said Wednesday in an interview on Bloomberg. The statement is a significant denial given that, according to
Davis, Cohen has turned over a new leaf by deciding to discuss his work on behalf of President Donald Trump.
MSNBC
Keeps Lying About the Dossier Being Corroborated. An MSNBC panelist named Paul Butler, a Georgetown Professor,
stated on the Joy Reid show that the Steele dossier "keeps getting corroborated" by Special Counsel Robert Mueller and
reporters. That is not at all true. Nothing of significance has been confirmed. Even Jim Comey said the FBI
could not verify the document. Earlier this week, Lanny Davis, the Clinton mob lawyer now representing Cohen, asserted
that the dossier's allegations about Cohen are "100 percent" false.
Loose Ends #44.
As I said in the previous note, I've been on the road all week and mostly ill-informed about the breaking Trump stories, and
much else. So all I have are some more Loose Ends to file. With one caveat. I hadn't been paying attention
to the fact that Michael Cohen's attorney is Lanny Davis. Lanny Davis??? Seriously? What is this —
some kind of parallel universe remake of the Clinton sex scandals of the 1990s? We all recall how that ended, don't we?
How
long before Cohen's lawyer changes his story again? Can Michael Cohen give evidence that President Trump
knowingly colluded with Russia, or does he have no knowledge whatsoever? It seems to depend on what story his lawyer is
teasing at the moment. Following Cohen's guilty plea Tuesday, attorney Lanny Davis said on MSNBC that his client is
willing to speak with special counsel Robert Mueller about a "conspiracy to collude," citing his "knowledge on certain
subjects that should be of interest." That seemed to confirm July 27 CNN and CBS reports that Cohen was prepared to
testify that Trump knew in advance about the 2016 Trump Tower meeting in which Russians were expected to offer political dirt
on Hillary Clinton. Davis personally confirmed those stories off the record to The [New York] Post at the time.
Except now Davis says it isn't true.
Lanny
Davis Admits He Lied to the Media About Major Trump Tower Report. Michael Cohen's attorney Lanny Davis admitted
on Thursday that he erroneously confirmed a CNN report about Trump's knowledge of the 2016 Trump Tower meeting with the
Russians. CNN reported on July 27 that Cohen was prepared to tell Special Counsel Robert Mueller that the president
had advance knowledge of the Trump Tower meeting. On Wednesday, Davis said that the reporting was "mixed up" and that his
client had no information regarding when Trump knew about the meeting. According to the New York Post, however, Davis
himself confirmed CNN's report as an anonymous source when it was first published. Davis is now apologizing on the record
for confirming something he did not know to be true.
Newest
Charity Case For The Resistance: Michael Cohen. If it's any comfort, it's not like he's making Peter
Strzok money or anything. Still, he's more than $100,000 richer than he was yesterday [8/21/2018] thanks to [an]
infernal GoFundMe page, proof that in America 2018 even a rich, crooked New York lawyer can rake in the ResistanceBucks
so long as he's performing the very important task of [annoying] the left's least favorite person.
Does
Michael Cohen's Guilty Plea Justify All The Trump Impeachment Talk? Talk of impeaching President Trump is
everywhere. But Democrats have been pining for Trump's impeachment since before he even set foot in the White
House. Michael Cohen's guilty plea is just the latest excuse to bring it up.
Why Michael Cohen Agreed to Plead Guilty — And
Implicate the President. Adding to the pressure, David Pecker, the chairman of American Media Inc., which
publishes the National Enquirer, provided prosecutors with details about payments Mr. Cohen arranged with women who
alleged sexual encounters with President Trump, including Mr. Trump's knowledge of the deals. This account of how
Mr. Cohen went from a pugnacious defender of the president to turning on Mr. Trump is based on details provided by
people close to Mr. Cohen and others briefed on the discussions with prosecutors. For weeks, the president had
been distancing himself from Mr. Cohen, including by stopping paying the lawyer's legal fees, making clear amid the
pressure that he was on his own.
How
The Clintons Directed Michael Cohen To Plead Guilty & Implicate President Trump. Weeks earlier D.C. Whispers warned readers
of Lanny Davis's sudden appearance at the side of former Trump personal attorney Michael Cohen. Mr. Davis is a longtime Clinton
operative and as recently as 2016 was helping to manage Hillary Clinton's presidential run. His longstanding ties to the Clintons
affords him strong ties with both the Democrat and Republican establishments, vast D.C. lobbying powers, and media moguls. In short,
he is as Deep State as Deep State gets. Now he's using Michael Cohen to add manufactured fuel to the "get President Trump" fire
as the Clintons sit back and watch and wait.
Clinton
Mob Lawyer Lanny Davis Sold Out His Client. Some legal experts are saying today that Lanny Davis, Hillary's
close friend and general counsel, sold his client Michael Cohen out with a sentence unwarranted by the crimes. Do we
have to ask ourselves why? Is it because Hillary Clinton is his client and not Michael Cohen? It's important to
note that the verdict and plea in the Paul Manafort and Michael Cohen cases respectively have nothing to do with Russia or
collusion. The Manafort trial did not deal with his role as a Trump campaign chairman. In Cohen's case, he said
he made the payments to Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougall at the direction of an unidentified candidate. That's not
criminal.
Democrats
Who Support Trump: CNN's Coverage of Cohen, Manafort Is a 'Side Show'. Registered Democrats who support
President Donald Trump told CNN its coverage of the president's administration is a "side show" and that they are glad to see
the stock market rise and their retirement savings increase. CNN aired footage Friday morning [8/24/2018] of correspondent
Jason Carroll speaking with registered Democrats in Pennsylvania praising Trump for improving the economy and looking out for
their savings. Eileen and Richard Sorokas supported former President Barack Obama during both elections, but then
switched over and supported Trump because of his promises to improve the economy.
The trial(s) of Paul Manafort
As
Impeachment Ends, It's Time to Correct These Nine Injustices. [#1] Commute Paul Manafort's sentence. Paul
Manafort has spent most of his time in solitary confinement since his arrest in 2017. As noted by the National Review,
"Everyone knows this prosecution is politically motivated. [The prosecutor] hates the president and wants to use solitary
confinement in a hellhole with violent criminals to squeeze Manafort into testifying against the president." Reason magazine,
no fan of either Trump or Manafort, has called this torture. Enough is enough. He's served years in brutal
conditions for white collar crimes. Commute his sentence.
Major
Update: Was Manafort A Plant, Willing Or Otherwise? Long ago a trusted source told me that the Clinton
campaign had very early on come to the conclusion that Trump would be the most dangerous GOP candidate, from a Clinton
perspective. That would have meant that the Clinton organization would have mobilized to take Trump down, and the
Russia narrative seems to have been decided on at an early date. Thus we see the persistent attempt by Felix Sater to
somehow link Trump to the moribund Trump Moscow project, the Trump Tower meeting with Veselnitskaya, etc. The usual
story is that Manafort was introduced into the Trump campaign through the efforts of Tom Barrack, a Syrian born real estate
magnate who was friends with both Trump and Manafort. Barrack had been a major help to Ivanka and Jared Kushner in a
difficult real estate situation and used that connection to urge the Kushners to get Barrack onto the campaign. Sound
familiar? Sound possible? Of course. The question is: Was there an ulterior motive to all this?
Is
an FBI Interview a G-Man's License to Lie? [Scroll down] Strangely, there was no such transcript of what
[Paul] Manafort had said in his interviews. This made it difficult to reconstruct what his responses to questioning had
been, let alone determine whether they were truthful. But if there was no transcript, surely the court could consult a
videotape of his interrogation, the sort of recording that is standard practice for local police who are interviewing, say, a
suspected car thief. And if there was no videotape for the judge to watch, surely there was, at the very least, an
audiotape. But no. The bureau has insisted instead, for more than half a century, on summarizing its
interrogations, of everyone from witnesses to targets, in a type of memo designated an FD-302 or just "302."
New
York prosecutors throw out Constitution to charge Manafort. This month, the greatest off Broadway production
should be titled "The Prosecutors," starring Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. and New York Attorney General
Letitia James. As in another dramatic comedy, "The Producers," the state case against former Donald Trump campaign
manager Paul Manafort seems designed to fail, leaving its prosecutors with the convenient windfall of public support and none
of the burden.
NY's
political prosecution of Manafort should scare us all. The Manhattan District Attorney's Office has indicted Paul Manafort for
mortgage fraud and more than a dozen other state felonies. This is a nakedly political prosecution. Democrats, who run the Empire
State, are apoplectic that President Trump could pardon his former campaign manager, who has been sentenced to 90 months in prison in
the Mueller probe. The federal charges had nothing to do with the rationale for the special counsel's investigation, which involves
Russia's interference in the 2016 election and any possible Trump campaign coordination in that effort. But there is no doubt that
the convictions and sentences, which resulted from separate but related proceedings in the Eastern District of Virginia and the District of
Columbia, are valid. In Washington on Wednesday [3/13/2019], Judge Amy Berman Jackson added 43 months of incarceration to the
47-months of imprisonment Judge T.S. Ellis imposed in Alexandria last week.
Paul
Manafort Was an Agent of Ukraine, Not Russia. According to the indictment Robert Mueller filed against him,
Manafort was an unregistered "agent of the Government of Ukraine." He also functioned as an agent of Viktor Yanukovych,
Ukraine's president from 2010 to 2014, and of two political parties, the Party of Regions and its successor, the Opposition
Bloc. Manafort was not an unregistered agent of Russia. Mueller never alleged that Manafort was a
clandestine operative of the Kremlin. He worked for Ukraine, not Putin. Indeed, for much of his time in Ukraine,
he pushed his clients against Putin's interests.
Federal
Judge Just Slapped The Anti-Trump Collusion Conspiracy Hoax In The Face. For months the Establishment Media and
its Democrat Party cohorts had breathlessly declared Paul Manafort was going away for "a very long time" while attempting to
insinuate Mr. Manafort's legal troubles were directly linked to his time with the Trump campaign. The truth is
they weren't. Manafort faced trial for matters totally unrelated to President Trump but rather on decades-old financial
dealings. And this week a federal judge said as much while also handing out a relatively light sentence that has the
far left seething.
Judge
Ellis rebuked Special Counsel Meuller when sentencing Paul Manafort. Judge T.S. Ellis, a Reagan appointee to
the Federal District Court for Eastern Virginia, is well known for speaking his mind. Yesterday, in sentencing Paul
Manafort, he rebuked Team Mueller's harsh sentence recommendation of 19-24 years' imprisonment as "excessive," and instead
set a lot of progressives' hair on fire by imposing a sentence of 47 months and recommended counting the nine months of time
served (much of it in solitary confinement, imposed by Judge Amy Berman Jackson in a separate case in D.C. District Court) against
that total, meaning just over three years of imprisonment.
The
'Otherwise Blameless Life' of Paul Manafort. "He has lived an otherwise blameless life," said Judge T. S. Ellis
as he sentenced Paul Manafort to just 47 months in prison on Thursday [3/7/2019]. In an otherwise blameless life, Paul Manafort
lobbied on behalf of the tobacco industry and wangled millions in tax breaks for corporations. In an otherwise blameless life, he
helped Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos bolster his image in Washington after he assassinated his primary political opponent.
In an otherwise blameless life, he worked to keep arms flowing to the Angolan generalissimo Jonas Savimbi, a monstrous leader bankrolled
by the apartheid government in South Africa. While Manafort helped portray his client as an anti-communist "freedom fighter,"
Savimbi's army planted millions of land mines in peasant fields, resulting in 15,000 amputees.
Mueller's
Final Manafort Filings Are Scant On Russia Details, Never Mention 'Trump' Or 'Collusion'. Special Counsel
Robert Mueller's final filings against former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort are likely bad news for Manafort, but may
be — oddly — good news for President Donald Trump. Mueller and his team made their final required
filing in Manafort's case late Friday, submitting a "government sentencing memorandum" to the United States District Court in
Washington, D.C., justifying their request for a harsh, 17-year prison sentence against Manafort. In it, the government
argues that Manafort "chose repeatedly and knowingly to violate the law — whether the laws proscribed garden-variety
crimes such as tax fraud, money laundering, obstruction of justice, and bank fraud, or more esoteric laws that he nevertheless
was intimately familiar with, such as the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA)," both before and after he was under scrutiny
by the Special Counsel.
Ken
Starr: The hammer is about to drop on Paul Manafort after Mueller learns he was a mole for Trump. Former
independent counsel Ken Starr told CNN on Wednesday that Paul Manafort is in even deeper trouble with Robert Mueller after it
was revealed Tuesday that his lawyer has been briefing the president's legal team about what he's been telling federal
investigators. "You at this stage belong to the prosecutors. You're now inside the tent, you're part of the
team," Starr said of Manafort. "So to be leaking information to the lawyers outside the team, that's going to be viewed
very seriously and obviously is."
Manafort/Assange
Drama Proves Media Will Buy Any Russia Conspiracy Story, No Matter Its Flaws. Many media figures have swallowed
whole, without evidence, a conspiracy theory that Donald Trump became president by treasonously colluding with Russia to
steal the 2016 election from its rightful owner, Hillary Clinton. The information operation that pushed this story
turned out to have been secretly developed and funded by Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee, a fact
uncovered only through the tenacious digging of Republicans on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence in the
face of major opposition from the media and Democrats on the committee. The information operation has been fed to an
increasingly compliant and credulous media with nearly no resistance. Fusion GPS is the Clinton- and Democrat-funded
group that initiated the Russia collusion story, although it is now, according to congressional testimony, being spearheaded
by the Democracy Integrity Project and funded to the tune of $50 million. The Washington Post quietly admitted, buried
the news, really, that the operation was funded by George Soros.
Hollywood
Celebrates Paul Manafort Guilty Plea. Several celebrities took to social media on Friday [9/14/2018] and posted
messages celebrating former Trump presidential campaign chairman Paul Manafort's decision to plead guilty to a federal
conspiracy charge as part of a plea agreement with special counsel Robert Mueller. [...] The White House issued a statement
Friday that said the charges against Paul Manafort are unrelated to Mr. Trump's election victory.
Paul Manafort's
Plea. Former convention delegate manager Paul Manafort, entered into a plea deal today with Special Counsel
Robert Mueller for issues related to his lobbying firm and FARA registry violations. The plea has nothing to do with
candidate Trump, president-elect Trump, or President Trump.
Manafort
Deal Looks Like Good News for Trump, Terrible News for Democrats. Something rarely brought up by our utterly
useless but still corrupt establishment media is that in order for someone to "flip," that someone has to have the goods on
someone else. In other words, if you want to deal your way out of prison time, you have to have something to deal with;
you actually have to serve someone's head up on a platter. Nevertheless, all throughout the Russian Collusion Hoax, and
every time someone agrees to "cooperate" with Mueller, the media squee like the 14-year-old girls they all are and then intentionally
mislead the public by matter-of-factly saying, "This is bad news for Trump." Well, no, actually it is not.
Manafort's Guilty
Plea. If we assume, for argument's sake, that the special counsel has wanted to make a criminal case on the
president (I've never been fully convinced of this), the challenge Mueller has had from the start is that there was no
underlying crime to predicate his investigation. He was rashly appointed by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein in
the uproar over the president's ham-fisted firing of FBI director James Comey. But terminating executive-branch
officers is not obstruction; it is a prerogative of the presidency. If it is done abusively or for unsavory motives,
that could be grounds for impeachment, but not for criminal prosecution. Ditto harassing the attorney general,
contemplating the removal of the special counsel himself, and allegedly weighing in on whether Michael Flynn, the former
national-security adviser, should be investigated. We can all agree — or, at least, many of us do
agree — that it would be better if the president did not do such things. It should be indisputable,
though, that the Constitution endows him with the authority to do them.
Paul
Manafort may have struck a deal with Robert Mueller. President Trump's ex-campaign chair Paul Manafort tentatively
agreed to a plea deal with special counsel Robert Mueller that will head off his upcoming second trial, ABC News reported Thursday
[9/13/2018]. The feds were expected to announce the agreement in court Friday, but it remained uncertain whether the
international man of intrigue had agreed to cooperate with prosecutors in the Russia probe. The network said Manafort
could be pleading guilty to avoid the stress and expense of a second trial following his conviction in Virginia on tax fraud
and money laundering charges.
Paul Manafort
and special counsel reach plea agreement to avert second trial. Paul Manafort, President Trump's former campaign
chairman, pleaded guilty Friday to federal conspiracy charges and agreed to cooperate in special counsel Robert S. Mueller
III's investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential race, prosecutors said Friday, marking a stunning about-face
for the former Trump deputy. The plea deal, unveiled in federal court in Washington, will allow Manafort, 69, to avoid a
second trial on charges stemming from his lucrative work for pro-Russian politicians in Ukraine before he joined the Trump
campaign and his subsequent attempts to tamper with witnesses in the case.
Bernard
Kerik: Why Manafort Was Put in Solitary. In a very small regional jail in Warsaw, Virginia, sits Bob
Mueller's big fish, Paul Manafort. Mueller, the U.S. Department of Justice Special Counsel appointed to investigate any
possible collusion between Russia and President Donald Trump's campaign, has charged Manafort with multiple counts of
conspiracy, money laundering, tax crimes, false statements, and anything else they can wad into a big ball and throw up
against the wall to see what sticks. After his arrest, Manafort was placed on house arrest on a $10 million-dollar
bail, until the government recently accused him of witness tampering and convinced U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson to
revoke his bail, and remand him to jail pending trail. To a casual observer, this would seem justified, however, to
anyone that has been through it, or has witnessed the government's selective and political prosecutions over the past few
decades, they would tell you that it is all a part of a prosecutorial strategy.
Manafort
split verdict says nothing on Trump, Russia, and the 2016 election. What does the Paul Manafort divided
verdict — guilty on 8 fraud charges with a mistrial declared on the remaining 10 charges — mean for the
question of whether the Trump campaign conspired with Russia to fix the 2016 election? Nothing. Of course,
everyone knew that going into the trial. Special counsel Robert Mueller was assigned to investigate "any links and/or
coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump."
Mueller's authority also covered "any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation," plus any issues that
might involve obstruction of the investigation. Prosecutors said before the trial that they would not mention the word
"Russia" at all during the proceedings, and that was pretty much the case. They also barely mentioned the name Trump,
although it came up briefly in the charges that Manafort gave a Chicago banker a spot on a Trump campaign advisory board
in exchange for approving an iffy loan.
The
Week Washington Officially Lost Its Collective Mind. In an orgy of political drama playing out in courtrooms up
and down the Acela corridor, President Trump's lawyer and his one-time campaign manager stand convicted of various
crimes. In this fever worse than Joe McCarthy's Red Scare, President Trump — therefore — has been
officially declared guilty by association! Paul Manafort, Mr. Trump's campaign manager for six minutes during the
summer of 2016, was found guilty of a host of crimes dating back more than a decade relating to his various business
ventures, none of which has anything to do with President Trump. What is interesting about the case against Mr. Manafort
is that prosecutors had declined to pursue some of the charges way back when. But that was before Mr. Manafort
betrayed the political establishment by working for Mr. Trump's presidential campaign.
Why
Trump's supporters won't care about Cohen and Manafort's convictions. Last week, a woman in her mid-40s who
lives in a tidy suburban enclave just outside of Columbus, Ohio, summed up her continued support for President Donald Trump
despite his morals, values and behavior not matching hers nor matching her expectations she had for any president of the
United States. "For decades I have been inspired by aspiring politicians and elected officials who took to the podium
or the camera and delivered poetic speeches to earn my trust and my support. They would sway me with expressive words
and artfully delivered promises," she said. While the words were beautiful, they never manifested into anything
tangible in her community.
The Trouble
with Impeachment. Paul Manafort, Bannon's predecessor as the top Trump campaign official, was found guilty on
August 21 of eight counts of bank and tax fraud. Manafort is the biggest fish special counsel Robert Mueller has
landed so far — even if the charges that Manafort hid or failed to disclose millions of dollars in income
from his consulting work overseas do not directly reflect Russian meddling in the 2016 election.
Jury
Finds Manafort Guilty on 8 Counts. After four days of deliberations, the jury reached a verdict on 8 counts and
could not make a decision on 10 counts in the tax evasion and bank fraud case against Paul Manafort. Judge Ellis declared a
mistrial on 10 counts. The verdict will be read on 8 counts.
Paul
Manafort is found guilty of eight counts of fraud after first trial brought by Robert Mueller's prosecutors.
Paul Manafort was found guilty of fraud by a federal jury in Alexandria, Virginia, on Tuesday in a bombshell verdict which
puts pressure on Donald Trump, whose campaign he once ran. The jury found Manafort guilty of eight counts of bank and
tax fraud, which could send the former Trump campaign manager to prison for the rest of his life. He had been charged
with a total of 18 counts of fraud. The jury said it was deadlocked on the other 10.
REPORT:
CNN Intentionally Intimidates Paul Manafort Jury. [Paul] Manafort, who worked for a short time as President
Trump's campaign chairman during the 2016 presidential election, has been charged by special counsel Robert Mueller with
various financial crimes, none of which have anything to do with Trump or the campaign. Manafort's fate now sits with
the jury, and after two days of deliberations, anti-Trump media outlets like CNN are becoming concerned Manafort could be
acquitted, which would be a major blow to Mueller's credibility and his ability to remove Trump from office — an
outcome the establishment media are desperate to orchestrate. And so, on Thursday [8/18/2018], CNN, along with six
other far-left media outlets (the Washington Post, BuzzFeed, Politico, the New York Times, NBC, and the
AP) sued for the release of the names and home addresses of all of the Manafort jurors, a move that is both disturbing and
almost unprecedented.
Manafort's Purge Trial.
I don't care much for Paul Manafort. Like his Democratic Party doppelgänger Tony Podesta, he is the kind of pond
scum that makes what we call The Swamp The Swamp. Indeed, the two men have worked together in the past, having a
natural affinity for exploiting the public interest for maximum profit. I was going to call this column "The Trial of
Tony Podesta" to point out the ridiculous disparity that one is on trial but not the other. Judge Ellis couldn't have
been more right. This is selective prosecution to get at the president. The charges are outrageously broad and
deliberately so. Nevertheless, it doesn't speak well of Trump that he chose to work with a man like Manafort.
The
Manafort Trial Ends. This week marked the end of the trial of Paul Manafort. The jury is now deliberating
his fate. I cannot with certainty opine on the prosecution's handling of the case. I can't because all we
know — in the absence of transcripts of the trial — is what reporters have told us. In my
experience they often lack the background to adequately apprise us of what went on. Reporters also give more weight
generally to salacious details — in this case Manafort's wardrobe and Gates' affairs — than they do to
the more significant documentary evidence. Finally, as I learned in covering the Libby trial as an observer, even the
best reporters have deadlines, which means their stories are often filed before the cross-examination of key witnesses and
begin the next day with the direct examination of the next witness, which means half of what occurred — often the
most important part to my mind — is unreported. Nevertheless, from even those accounts, it would appear that
the prosecution was hardly a slam dunk, and Manafort's lawyers obviously thought so in closing without presenting any
case. In closing arguments, they hit upon those weaknesses.
The
left's enforcers: CNN sues to reveal names and addresses of Manafort jurors. If it were I, and if the
information reported in the news were the same as the information given to the jury, I'd let Manafort walk, given that they
should have caught what he was doing a decade ago, not now. The only reason they didn't bother was because one of the
Podesta brothers was also involved, and apparently that meant protection for all of them — gag. So prosecute
the lazy prosecutors. Because if prosecutors were serious about this case, they'd have done something a long time ago.
Since they weren't and the special counsel is on a witch hunt to Get Trump for political reasons, I'd send a message to the
prosecutors that this is a political persecution, and Manafort deserves to walk.
Very
Confident Manafort Defense Won't Bother To Call Defense Witnesses Due To Weak Prosecution Case. It's a move
that has both New York and Washington D.C. buzzing. The defense team for Paul Manafort, after listening to federal
prosecutors lay out their case against Mr. Manafort for reported banking and tax discrepancies dating back more than ten
years, gave the court a collective shrug and moved to have the trial go straight to closing arguments without bothering to
call a single defense witness. Though a potentially risky move, it is also a sign the defense believes federal
prosecutors fell far short of presenting a case beyond a reasonable doubt — a form of laughing in the
prosecution's face. If the jury then returns a verdict of not guilty, it will be a serious embarrassment for the
Mueller investigation which was clearly pinning its hopes on getting Manafort to provide something, anything, that Mueller
could use to go after President Trump.
Banana Republic: Paul Manafort Is Being
Held in Tiny Prison Cell with No Reading Material or TV During Trial. Paul Manafort was Donald Trump's campaign
manager for two months. Now he must be punished. The US government is holding Paul Manafort in a tiny prison cell
during his trial with no reading material and no television. Paul Manafort faces 305 years in prison for tax evasion
charges — a crime that typically has an average sentence of 1.5 years.
Manafort
case is about Manafort — not Trump or the Trump campaign. [A]side from the charges of lying on
bank-loan applications, Manafort is charged with failing to pay taxes stemming from his work for a Russian-backed Ukrainian
president. Meanwhile, international media attention is focused on this case like it is the trial of the century.
So it must be a really big deal and somehow involve Donald Trump or at least his campaign, right? Wrong. The
trial involves Manafort's business dealings and tax filings going back to 2006 — long before he ever signed on as
a volunteer on the Trump presidential campaign.
Paul
Manafort Learns That Encrypting Messages Doesn't Matter If the Feds Have a Warrant to Search Your iCloud Account.
Federal prosecutors have accused Paul Manafort of witness tampering, alleging that he used WhatsApp and Telegram in an attempt
to coordinate his testimony with old business associates. Manafort, Donald Trump's former campaign manager, may have thought
that he was being sneaky by using encrypted chat apps, but Manafort just learned the hard way that strong encryption doesn't really
matter if you're backing up your messages to the cloud — especially when the federal government gets a warrant to access
your iCloud account.
Mueller
leaves Washington in despair. As far as I can tell, Manafort stands trial for buying an ostrich jacket. I
was so disappointed when I discovered it was made of ostrich hide and not feathers. I expected Manafort dressed in a
1970s Superfly outfit. Instead it is just a leather jacket.
Russian
Collusion Investigation Has Orwellian Roots. Paul Manafort may or may not have violated tax and banking laws in
2010. Given the twisted and arcane nature of those laws, who knows? What we do know is that Manafort first was
investigated for breaking those laws in that year by Robert Mueller's FBI. A discretionary decision was made not to
prosecute. It wasn't a priority of the Obama Administration to indict consultants over how they reported income from
foreign governments. If that were a priority, a lot of big shots in Washington would have gone down. [...] No,
Manafort's crime is the same as Facebook's: he failed to measure the orthodoxy of his political client's message and,
because of that, he now faces an inquisition.
Manafort
trial is complicated but Americans need to know this. All of the testimony at the Manafort trial has addressed
events that occurred long before Manafort went to work for 2016 Trump campaign. The testimony has focused on Manafort's
and Gates's activities as alleged "unregistered agents" representing the Ukrainian government starting in 2006. It would
be absurd to argue that Manafort's other clients in the 12 years since then are somehow to blame for any criminal activity
he may have engaged in — and prosecutors aren't even trying to point the finger at President Trump for these activities.
Manafort's lawyers claim that Gates was the actual wrongdoer, and they subjected him to a punishing cross-examination.
Robert
Mueller requests Trump-related portion of Manafort's trial be kept secret. Special counsel Robert Mueller made
an unusual request Thursday [8/9/2018] to keep a Trump campaign-related portion of Paul Manafort's trial confidential because
it uncovered "substantive evidence" relating to the ongoing investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.
The evidence was revealed during a private discussion between federal Virginia Judge T.S. Ellis and lawyers representing
Manafort and his former associate Rick Gates, Mueller charged in a filing.
Judge
in Manafort case seals discussion of Rick Gates and Trump probe. A federal judge late Thursday [8/9/2018]
granted a request from special counsel Robert Mueller's office to keep secret a portion of a private discussion they had at
the bench with Paul Manafort's attorneys and the judge during the testimony of Rick Gates. The special counsel's office
said in a court filing Thursday that the conference should be sealed because it would "reveal substantive evidence pertaining
to an ongoing investigation."
Manafort? Who
Cares? Other than seeing occasional headlines, I have spent less than one minute following the Paul Manafort
criminal trial. I imagine the overwhelming majority of Americans would say the same. Here's why:
[#1]
I don't care about Paul Manafort. I had never heard of him before his brief association with the Trump
campaign.
[#2] Manafort is charged, in essence, with tax evasion. He may well have dodged
taxes. If so, he is not alone, and it is of no interest to me.
[#3] The charges against Manafort have
nothing to do with Donald Trump or the 2016 election. [...]
[#4] I have zero respect for Bob
Mueller. The judge who is presiding over the Manafort trial seems to agree.
[#5] Most people who
aren't crazy — these days, that is a significant qualification — seem to have figured out that the
Mueller "investigation" is a bust.
Cranky
judge, flawed witness threaten Mueller's Manafort case. Special counsel Robert Mueller's team of prosecutors
have spent several days building what many legal experts consider a slam-dunk case against President Donald Trump's former
campaign chairman, Paul Manafort. But it has been surprisingly hard going at times, and as they prepare to rest their
case as early as Thursday [8/9/2018], they bear battle wounds that Manafort's lawyers are sure to exploit as they mount their
defense.
IRS agent:
Manafort had $16M in unreported income. An IRS agent revealed that Paul Manafort had at least $16 million in
unreported taxable business income over four years while testifying during the former Trump campaign chairman's trial for tax
and bank fraud on Wednesday [8/8/2018]. IRS agent Michael Welch said in federal court in Alexandria, Virginia, that Manafort
received $15.5 million from Ukraine which he then used to pay for clothes, homes and landscaping between 2010 and 2014.
Mueller's
'Star Witness' Rick Gates Falls Apart During Cross-Examination by Manafort Lawyers — Perjures Himself. Paul
Manafort's legal team painted Rick Gates, a former business associate to Manafort as a liar who embezzled millions of dollars to
fund his secret life with his mistress in a blistering cross-examination Tuesday [8/7/2018]. Rick Gates previously pleaded
guilty and agreed to cooperate with Mueller; he was even referred to as the Special Counsel's 'star witness.'
Drama
grips final moments of Rick Gates' testimony in Manafort trial, as lawyer poses surprise question. Rick Gates
has finished three days' worth of dramatic testimony in federal court against his former business partner, ex-Trump campaign
chairman Paul Manafort — but not before defense lawyers caused a stir by pressing him for details on his past
infidelity. A day earlier, Gates acknowledged having a single extramarital relationship in London while working for
Manafort. But on Wednesday [8/8/2018], Manafort attorney Kevin Downing seemed to accuse Gates of having affairs with
multiple individuals, asking Gates whether he disclosed four affairs to the special counsel's office.
Manafort
Trial Threatens the Constitution, Not Just Trump. One of the things that most concerned the U.S. Constitution's
framers was the misuse of the criminal justice system by those in power to check their political foes. We have a Bill
of Rights, in large part, to protect us against this most harmful abuse of arbitrary power. Ostensibly, we are
protected from unreasonable searches and seizures, from delayed trials and unnecessary incarceration, from being forced to be
witnesses against ourselves, and from "cruel and unusual punishments." Unfortunately, all the parchment safeguards in the
world cannot guard a citizenry from a truly corrupt government, and a corrupt government is capable of securing its evil ends
by enlisting persons of good faith who may find themselves unwittingly employed in miscreancy. Something very like this
has occurred in the Robert Mueller prosecutorial investigation of Donald Trump for alleged collusion with Russians to
influence the 2016 presidential election.
Judge
Ellis Brings Mueller's Prosecutor to Tears in Courtroom Showdown. It looks like Mueller's prosecutors can't
take the heat. Rick Gates, Paul Manafort's former business associate took the witness stand Monday afternoon in the
bank fraud and tax evasion case against Manafort. After jurors were dismissed, Judge T.S. Ellis scolded one of
Mueller's prosecutors and a 10-minute courtroom spat ensued.
Manafort
prosecutors, Judge Ellis engage in 10-minute courtroom spat. After jurors were dismissed Monday [8/6/2018] in the Paul
Manafort trial Monday, the federal judge overseeing the case and prosecutors trying the former Trump campaign chairman got into an
extended verbal debate — lasting about 10 minutes — over the merits of the prosecution, the length of the case
and even the eye contact of prosecutor Greg Andres.
Mueller
is a Terrorist: Raided Manafort for Documents [which had] Already [been] Turned Over. Remember this as
they put Manafort deeper and deeper into the "Mueller" scope. Mueller raided Manafort(with guns drawn) for documents he
already had. To the logical mind, that is terrorism. What makes Mueller any better than an ISIS thug? Isn't
that how Islamic terrorists behave? More and more Americans are beginning to see special counsel Robert Mueller's
investigation for what it really is: A desperate last-ditch effort to undermine POTUS Donald Trump's administration and
eventually drive him from office, overturning the results of the 2016 election. They have no evidence of collusion
between the Trump camp and Russia, so they go for the next best thing. They go after the people closest to Trump,
hoping that one or two will turn over states evidence and stab Trump in the back.
When
the Mueller Gang Met Judge Ellis. Paul Manafort. Tony Podesta. Tad Devine. Greg Craig.
Manafort worked for Trump. Tony Podesta is the brother of Hillary Clinton's campaign manager. Tad Devine was
Bernie Sanders' chief strategist. Greg Craig was Obama's White House Counsel. All four men also, directly or
indirectly, allegedly did work for the European Centre for a Modern Ukraine. And the ECFMU was allegedly a front for
Yanukovich's Ukrainian pro-Russian faction. Manafort and the Podesta Group had failed to register as foreign
agents. Tad Devine had worked for Manafort on the Ukraine project. Craig had written a report on Ukraine for one
of Manafort's lobbying efforts. But only Manafort had the predawn raid, the solitary confinement and the high profile
show trial. [...] Podesta, Devine and Craig are getting a pass because it's not really about Manafort. It's about Trump.
Manafort
case judge warns Mueller team they 'can't prove conspiracy' without star witness. The federal judge in the trial of
ex-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort told Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team on Thursday [8/2/2018] they cannot prove a key
part of their case unless prosecutors call Manafort's former business partner to the stand. U.S. District Court Judge T.S. Ellis
III issued the warning after prosecutors suggested Wednesday that Rick Gates — who is cooperating with prosecutors and had been
considered a potential star witness — might not be called to the stand after all. Referencing Gates, Ellis told
prosecutors in court they "can't prove conspiracy without him."
Judge
Ellis Loses His Patience — Shouts at Mueller's Prosecutors — Then Ends Court Early. Judge
T.S. Ellis lost his patience with Mueller's prosecutors Thursday afternoon and ended court early after the govt lawyers made
the same mistake twice. It's amateur hour with Mueller's lawyers!
Judge
Ellis Interrupts Mueller Prosecutors During Opening Statement in Manafort Case: "It Isn't a Crime to Have
Money". The bank fraud and tax evasion trial for President Trump's former campaign chair Paul Manafort began
Tuesday morning [7/31/2018] in a federal court in Alexandria, VA. Mueller's prosecutors and Manafort's legal team both came
out swinging with blistering opening statements. Paul Manafort's lawyer set the tone early Tuesday morning when he told
CBS reporter, Paula Reid: No deal. Manafort attorney Kevin Downing tells me "No chance!" his client will
cooperate with Special Counsel in order to avoid trial today.
Manafort
[was] Tried 8 Years Ago for [the] Same Crime and [the] Fed Cleared Him. [Scroll down] Again, speculating,
but why wouldn't Mueller take a deal, if he's guilty? Perhaps because he's innocent? And I have felt for quite
some time that somebody will begin asking for discovery, and that won't be good for anybody on the Left. Imagine going
down that rabbit hole, where you find more emails, text message, and other damning evidence against the FBI, the CIA, the
NSA, the FISA court, The Clinton Foundation, and even Barack Obama?
Manafort
Investigated But Not Charged for Crimes in 2014 Because Obama Cronies Implicated in Probe. A pair of Internet
sleuths have uncovered information from the 2014 investigation of Paul Manafort that reportedly went nowhere because Manafort
was tied to former President Obama's Chief Counsel, Greg Craig, and State Department envoy, Cliff Sloan. Techno Fog
noted that the 2014 investigation of Paul Manafort went nowhere because it implicated Obama's former White House Counsel Greg
Craig[.]
Manafort's
case proves 'the swamp' — not collusion — exists. The trial of onetime Trump campaign
chairman Paul Manafort has ignited a new series of tweets from the president about ending special counsel Robert Mueller's
"witch hunt." But this trial and other actions by Mueller this week will be instrumental in bringing about one of Trump's key
campaign promises: the one to "drain the swamp." As was the case with the indictments of Manafort, one keyword was
missing from the opening arguments at the trial on Tuesday: "Trump." Everything discussed in the courtroom precedes
Manafort's three months on the 2016 Trump campaign by two years.
Judge
Napolitano Doubles Down: Says Paul Manafort was Exonerated 8 Years Ago — May Call Rosenstein as First
Witness. Judge Napolitano dropped a bomb Tuesday [7/31/2018] on FOX and Friends. The FOX News legal
analyst told the audience that Paul Manafort was already exonerated eight years ago on these same charges and... Rod
Rosenstein was the lawyer who exonerated him!
Mueller
team lectured by Judge in Manafort case. Special Counsel Robert Mueller's prosecutors were lectured by a
federal judge on Wednesday for the language they've used in the courtroom and more, as the trial of former Trump campaign
chairman Paul Manafort entered its second day. U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis III specifically told prosecutors to stop
using the word "oligarch" to describe wealthy Ukrainians, whose dealings with Manafort are at the heart of the fraud charges
he faces in northern Virginia federal court.
Why
Hasn't the Press Reported That Paul Manafort Was Exonerated 8 Years Ago? How many of you know that Paul
Manafort was exonerated by federal investigators who investigated his financial and tax affairs eight years ago?
Mueller's
team slams Manafort's lavish lifestyle, defense points to ex-colleague Gates as fraud trial begins. Former
Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort's lavish lifestyle was front-and-center during opening arguments in his fraud trial
Tuesday afternoon, as prosecutors said he lied to put his money ahead of the law, while defense attorneys — and
even the presiding judge — reminded jurors that exorbitant wealth, in itself, is not a crime. Prosecutors
also called their first witness in the case: former Bernie Sanders campaign adviser Tad Devine, who worked closely with
Manafort on several elections in Ukraine, including the successful 2010 presidential campaign of since-deposed pro-Russian
leader Viktor Yanukovych.
Prosecutors
say Manafort's wealth was fueled by lies to IRS and banks. President Trump's former campaign chairman Paul Manafort
went on trial Tuesday [7/31/2018] in federal court in Alexandria, Va., where prosecutors charged that his personal fortune was
propped up by years of lies to tax authorities and banks. The first trial to arise out of the investigation run by
special counsel Robert S. Mueller III got off to a fast start Tuesday, as a jury of six men and six women was
picked — and opening statements delivered — in less than a day. The stakes are extremely
high. For the 69-year-old Manafort, a conviction on the most serious charges could lead to an effective life prison
sentence. For Mueller and his team probing Russian interference in the 2016 election, a courtroom loss could damage his
credibility and amplify calls by Republicans for his investigation to be shut down.
Mueller
can't afford to lose the Manafort trial. The first trial of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Russian probe
presents multiple challenges to both the prosecution and defense. The pressure is enormous on both sides.
Mueller's team cannot afford a loss in their very first trial. And a loss for former Trump campaign chairman Paul
Manafort, who also faces a second trial in September in Washington, DC, would make defending his second case almost a waste
of time.
FBI
describes early-morning raid of Paul Manafort's condo. The FBI on Wednesday [8/1/2018] described the details of
the early-morning raid on former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort's Alexandria condo on the second day of Manafort's
trial. FBI special agent Matthew Mikuska, an 11-year veteran of the bureau, testified in court in Alexandria, Va.,
saying he was the seizing agent for the government's search last year. Mikuska told the jury agents knocked three times
on Manafort's door, but used a key to gain access after receiving no answer. Once inside, agents saw Manafort.
Manafort
trial to focus on lavish lifestyle, not collusion. The trial of President Donald Trump's onetime campaign chairman
will open this week with tales of lavish spending, secret shell companies and millions of dollars of Ukrainian money flowing through
offshore bank accounts and into the political consultant's pocket.
Another
Narrative Busted: The Focus of Manafort's Upcoming Trial Will Make Liberals Very Sad. The first federal
trial for former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort is set to start tomorrow in Washington D.C. Leftists are salivating
over what the trial could reveal about the 2016 presidential election, alleged Russian collusion and Manafort's relationship
with President Donald Trump. But according to a new report from the Associated Press, they're likely to be disappointed
as the trial will focus on Manafort's business dealings and lavish lifestyle, not collusion.
So What's Paul Manafort
On Trial For Again? Paul Manafort's trial gets underway in Virginia tomorrow with jury selection being the
first order of the day. It's been a long time coming and the public (or at least the majority of the media) are keen to
find out what sort of answers may be in store for us. But the list of charges and the evidence being presented by the
prosecution seems to be sorely lacking in one area. That's highlighted in the title of this Associated Press piece from
the weekend: Manafort trial to focus on lavish lifestyle, not collusion.
James Comey's notes and memos
This subsection has moved to a page of its own,
located here.
The Inspector General's Report, released August 29, 2019:
Senators:
IG FISA Abuse Report Misled Public About Crossfire Hurricane. Last week's political trifecta — the
Iowa caucus, the State of the Union, and President Trump's impeachment acquittal — temporarily starved other
stories of oxygen. Among those was the news that the inspector general's report on FISA abuse was misleading and that
redacted information contained in four footnotes contradicted sections of the lengthy expose on the Crossfire Hurricane
investigation. Sens. Chuck Grassley and Ron Johnson dropped that bombshell in a letter delivered to Attorney
General William Barr that requested Barr declassify the information hidden in the redacted footnotes. While the
declassified version of the Grassley-Johnson letter did not identify the four footnotes at issue, a detailed analysis of the
IG report suggests the redacted information concerned Christopher Steele's sources and potentially the FBI's purported
predication for the launch of Crossfire Hurricane. These conclusions come from a deep-dive into the IG report read in
tandem with the Grassley-Johnson letter.
Does
the IG Report "Exonerate" James Comey? Judicial Watch's Tom Fitton says not at all. In the eyes of
Judicial Watch's Tom Fitton, what is the significance of the Department of Justice Inspector General's report, or IG report,
on former FBI Director James Comey? Does it exonerate Comey as the former FBI Director claims? What is the
significance of Bruce Ohr's interview records, FBI 302's, with Christopher Steele? What else might be found in other
Christopher Steele-related documents? [Video clip]
Inspector
General's Report Exposes Another 'Collusion' Myth. [Scroll down] Ever since the memo was leaked to the
news media by a Comey pal more than two years ago, the American public has been warned how that brief discussion between
Comey and Trump represented an egregious presidential power play: Trump, the story goes, was squeezing his top G-Man to
stop looking into his campaign for conspiring with the Kremlin because everyone associated with Trump, we were told, was
guilty. But that portrayal of events was never the truth. The conversation in February 2017 had nothing to do
with the Russia investigation, [...]
Inspector
General's Report Exposes Another 'Collusion' Myth. The presidential skullduggery allegedly exposed by the Flynn
memo is just one more myth that has been peddled by anti-Trump partisans to bolster a fabricated storyline that the Trump
campaign colluded with Russia to defeat Hillary Clinton. The media will ignore the obvious truth about the memo —
but just like every other example of media malpractice related to this scandal, no mea culpas will be offered.
Democrats will repeat the falsehood on the campaign trail next year with no pushback from reporters. Republicans can try
to push back but it's probably too late; the public has already been told what to believe.
The
Comey-Brennan Conspiracy to Violate Trump's Civil Rights. The Comey IG report is interesting for any number of
reasons, the first of which is that the Justice Department decided not to prosecute Comey for his intentionally leaking one
of his "private" memos about conversations with President Trump to a friend. He did so, as we've known for two years,
specifically to have that friend leak it to the New York Times for publication. Comey intended those leaks to
have precisely the effect they did: to cause the appointment of a special counsel. Robert Mueller's subsequent
investigation into the ephemeral "Russia collusion" investigation failed in what Comey — and the rest of the
anti-Trumpers in the Justice Department and the CIA — intended it to do. It didn't remove Trump from
office in a "soft" coup.
Second
IG Report to come, and it's gonna come for James Comey! According to Fox News, the feds aren't done with Comey —
there's a second IG report to come, it sounds like. [Video clip] That's coming from Mark Meadows, so take that for
what it's worth. But it IS odd that they laid out all this bad stuff that Comey did, then denied to prosecute.
The Inspector General
Glosses Over Some Ugly Truths About The FBI. The Justice Department Office of the Inspector General's report
released Aug. 29 clearly stated that James Comey violated and abused FBI policies in managing memos in which he supposedly
documented confidential conversations with the president. This is a revelation that most of us have known for quite
some time. However, Inspector General (IG) Michael Horowitz has yet again glossed over some major problems. It
appears that the main reason Horowitz concludes former FBI Director James Comey only violated his FBI Employment Agreement
and DOJ/FBI "policies" was because the documents he kept, disclosed, and leaked to improper parties were not considered truly
classified. That apparently keeps them from being serious enough to prosecute. So, who made the decision that
they were not classified? The answer would be outrageous if it were not virtually farcical.
Yes,
Comey did leak classified information. The new report from the Justice Department inspector general proves
beyond any doubt that fired FBI Director James Comey leaked sensitive law enforcement material in the Trump-Russia
investigation. Doing so set a "dangerous example" for the bureau's other employees, Inspector General Michael Horowitz
wrote. Still, Comey's supporters have claimed exoneration on one front: that Comey did not leak classified
information. Some reacted angrily when President Trump tweeted that Comey had done so. But Comey did, in fact,
leak classified information. It's right there in the report. It wasn't much classified information, and it was
perhaps not terribly important, and Justice Department officials concluded it was not worth prosecuting. But Comey
leaked classified material.
Coming
Legal Attractions. Two matters are likely to reveal more of the machinations of the FBI and intelligence
agencies in the past presidential election and since. First there's the Department of Justice's Inspector General's
inquiries. The first inquiry resulted in a devastating account of former FBI Director James Comey's conduct. Many
were disappointed that Attorney General William Barr chose not to indict him based on the record IG Michael Horowitz
presented, but bear in mind, this inquiry did not cover what will be a larger report on the abuse of the FISA (Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Act) in which it seems Comey played a significant role. While Comey, as is his self-deluded
wont, claims the report vindicated him, it most certainly did not.
Jim
Jordan: James Comey Owes An Apology To Our Country. Ohio Republican Congressman Jim Jordan blasted fired
FBI Director James Comey on Fox News Thursday night [8/29/2019], saying he will in no way apologize to Mr. Comey and in
fact, it is the now-disgraced Comey who owes America an apology for the past two years. As Katie covered, the
Department of Justice Inspector General released a blistering report Thursday morning "confirming fired FBI Director James
Comey is a politically motivated liar and rampant leaker of official, confidential information. He broke all kinds of
FBI rules, protocol and laws in his effort to take down President Trump and his administration through the launch of a
Special Counsel investigation."
Trump
Was Always the Target of the Russia Investigation. Donald Trump was always the target. The point of the
Russia investigation was to make a case against Donald Trump. Preferably, the case would drive him from office.
At a minimum, it would render him unelectable by the 2020 stretch run. The kind of case was less important than the
objective: criminal prosecution or impeachment. In accordance with the collusion narrative, the latter would mean
trying to show that Trump was compromised by the Kremlin. That is the astonishing takeaway from Inspector General
Michael Horowitz's report on former FBI director James Comey's handling of his memos.
The
Deep State Will Face Justice Soon! Right? [Scroll down] Then we have that pathetic excuse for a
human being, James Comey, gloating over the I.G. report that issued a verbal slap on the wrist for his infractions.
Comey: "And to all those who've spent two years talking about me 'going to jail' or being a 'liar and a leaker' —
ask yourselves why you still trust people who gave you bad info for so long, including the president." But no worries:
Comey will pay when the FISA abuse report comes out. Or not: Washington insiders are now foreshadowing immunity for the
entire cabal, saying that, "sadly," these lawbreakers probably won't be prosecuted. That's not sad; it's terrifying.
If we can't indict and prosecute these clowns who have conspired to overthrow our government, who have committed the most egregious
political crime in history, then stick a fork in our Republic. We're done. But what can we do? Actually, this
whole strung out Spygate nightmare is an exercise to ensure we do nothing. Washington isn't a swamp; it's a sewer, and the
rats that inhabit it are never going to allow their comrades to be indicted.
Jumpin' Jim Flash.
Yesterday the Department of Justice Office of Inspector General released its long awaited report on certain elements of James
Comey's misconduct as Director of the FBI. Contrary to his assurance to President Trump — an assurance that projected
something of his essence — the report demonstrates that Comey is a weasel (and worse). He is also (again to
borrow the words of his own denial to Trump) a sneak, a leaker, and a liar (and worse), but these are venial sins in the
panoply of Comey's misconduct. There is no substitute for reading the report.
New
report details Comey plan to ambush Trump with Moscow sex allegation. A just-released Justice Department
inspector general's report provides new details on a January 2017 plan by then-FBI Director James Comey, top bureau
officials, and the nation's intelligence chiefs to spring a scandalous allegation on President-elect Trump, quickly record
his reaction, use a prearranged secure videoconference to discuss the information, and fit it all into the FBI's ongoing (but
unknown to Trump) "Crossfire Hurricane" investigation. The allegation came from the Steele dossier, the collection of
unverified tales about Trump and Russia compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele. The story was that in a
Moscow hotel room in 2013, Trump had watched as prostitutes performed a kinky sex act — and Russian intelligence
service cameras rolled.
Trump
says he should be 'given our stolen time back' after release of Comey report. President Trump suggested Friday
that he and his supporters should be "given our stolen time back" in light of a Justice Department report that found former
FBI director James B. Comey violated FBI policies regarding memos that helped spark the special counsel investigation. [...]
"The disastrous IG Report on James Comey shows, in the strongest of terms, how unfairly I, and tens of millions of great
people who support me, were treated," Trump said in a tweet, referring to the Justice Department's inspector general.
"Our rights and liberties were illegally stripped away by this dishonest fool. We should be given our stolen time back?"
Inspector
general takes apart Comey's excuses for his actions. Of all the tall tales James Comey has told, none compare
to the line he fed President Trump at their infamous January 2017 dinner. As recounted in the former Federal Bureau of
Investigation director's memo about that evening, "I said I don't do sneaky things, I don't leak, I don't do weasel moves."
The Justice Department's inspector general begs to differ. In a new report about Mr. Comey's handling of those memos,
Michael Horowitz demonstrates that Mr. Comey in 2017 was consistently leaky and sneaky. The report refutes any claim
that the then-director was justified in taking these actions. He repeatedly, and knowingly, broke the rules.
IG
Report: James Comey Passed Private Conversation with Trump to FBI Team Investigating Russia Collusion.
The IG report relates that prior to the briefing, FBI members on Comey's team discussed the need to memorialize the exchanges
between Comey and Trump during the private January 6, 2017 briefing in Trump Tower just in case Trump made statements
relevant to the agency's Russia probe. In other words, they plotted to stealthily use statements Trump said to Comey in
a private briefing to inform their Russia collusion investigation. The IG further relates that Comey went on to do just
that. He had a laptop waiting for him in the car, where he immediately began memorializing the private talk.
James
Comey was the Bad Guy in the 'Russia Collusion' story. The Department of Justice Inspector General Report
revealed what many of us suspected all along: James Comey was the Bad Guy in the 'Russia Collusion' story. He
lied to the President, lied about lying to the President, leaked government information to cover up his lying, and lied to
the public about his lying. Comey tried to set up the President soon after he took office and failed, and covered up
the attempt. Comey is revealed to be a completely manipulative bureaucratic infighter who maneuvered the government
into a two-year Executive Branch paralysis in the form of the Mueller investigation, while falsely proclaiming himself the
only holy player in the saga. His defense when unmasked in the IG Report is to crow that he wasn't indicted.
Horowitz's
'scathing' report about James Comey's behavior is worthless without indictments. [Scroll down] Comey
clearly violated FBI policies, but if the memos were classified — and if they contained information discussed
between him and the president of the United States, it was classified — why isn't he being prosecuted for
it? No offense to Sen. Graham and the others, but Americans have watched with disgust as one Deep State elitist
after another, beginning with crime boss Hillary Clinton, have gotten away with what amounts to a coup attempt to
depose a duly elected president for more than two years. If anyone else, including, say, a line FBI agent, had done
what James Comey did, they'd be wearing prison stripes by now. Same goes for Clinton's criminal mishandling of
classified information.
Reaction:
'I Wouldn't Say James Comey Is Out of the Woods'; 'This Is Just the Beginning'. Reaction came swiftly on
Thursday, after the Justice Department inspector general released a report saying that former FBI Director James Comey failed
to live up to his responsibility to protect sensitive information. And by using sensitive information to force the
appointment of a special prosecutor, the OIG found that Comey "set a dangerous example for the over 35,000 current FBI
employees — and the many thousands more former FBI employees — who similarly have access to or
knowledge of non-public information." "I wouldn't say James Comey is out of the woods," Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.)
said. "We're in the pregame show. This is just the beginning," Jay Sekulow, President Trump's attorney said.
The
Substance Within the Report Shows a Two-Tiered Justice System. [Scroll down] James Baker, Peter Strzok,
Andrew McCabe, James Rybicki and Lisa Page were determining what parts of James Comey's investigative notes needed to be
classified. The corrupt FBI was in position to police itself. This is not a conflict of interest, it is better
described as a profound conflict of self-interest. The information the 'small group' wanted to use to
frame the target would be visible, not classified; however, any material that would outline the construct of their corruption
in targeting the target would be hidden, classified. You can't make this stuff up folks. The "small group"
WAS the sources and methods they were protecting. Everything needed to understand that level of corruption is
outlined in the way the IG report discusses the handling of James Comey's investigative notes (ie. memos). AND the fact
that James Comey kept them hidden, yes hidden.
How
do you solve a problem like James Comey? To begin solving the problem of former FBI director James Comey, who's
been blasted by the Department of Justice in its Inspector General Report, start by never again hiring people who value
themselves so loftily over the people they are charged with representing. In other words, never hire someone like him,
who absolutely believed he was smarter than, better than, and more important than the people whose laws his agency was tasked
with enforcing.
DOJ Inspector
General: Comey Set a Dangerous Example. Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz released
a report Thursday outlining a wide range of serious misconduct by former FBI Director James Comey. Concluding that
"Comey set a dangerous example for the over 35,000 current FBI employees ... who similarly have access to or knowledge of
non-public information," the 83-page report implicitly vindicated President Trump's decision to fire the rogue FBI director
in May 2017. The Office of the Inspector General also confirmed that Comey improperly leaked highly sensitive material
to the media for the express purpose of pressuring the Justice Department to appoint a special counsel to investigate the
2016 presidential election.
Comey
Taunts Critics Following Release of IG Report, Takes Swipe at President Trump. Fired FBI Director James Comey
taunted critics and took a swipe at President Trump immediately following the release of the Inspector General's report
regarding Comey's handling of the Russia probe and leak of memos. The Justice Department declined to prosecute Comey,
however the IG found multiple ethics and department guideline violations by Comey.
Read
DOJ watchdog's list of all the times ex-FBI boss broke the rules. Former FBI Director James Comey received heavy
criticism from the Justice Department's inspector general in a blistering report released Thursday [8/29/2019] about his infamous
memos documenting his discussions with President Trump. The report found that Comey violated bureau policies by drafting,
leaking and retaining the memos. However, it noted that the Justice Department declined to prosecute Comey over the
violations. For his part, Comey responded by insisting that he is not a "liar and a leaker," saying an apology from
his critics "would be nice."
James Comey himself
This subsection has moved to a page of its own,
located here.
News and timely commentary about the Inspector General's report, released June 14, 2018:
A Review of Various Actions by the Federal Bureau
of Investigation and Department of Justice in Advance of the 2016 Election. IG report available for download.
The
overlooked bombshell of the IG report. Before the report was released, we knew from Comey's July 2016 statement
that Clinton's private emails included "seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special
Access Program level when they were sent and received." We also knew that the FBI "also found information that was
properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail." Comey further
declared, "We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom
Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account." And he speculated that, given how "extremely
careless" Clinton had been, it was "possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton's personal e-mail account."
Well, it turns out, the FBI knew with certainty at the time that hostile actors had in fact gained access to classified information
via Clinton's emails.
The
Horowitz IG Report. There are two smoking guns. First, Peter Strzok famously texted his illicit lover that
"We won't let [Donald Trump's election] happen." The other is found at 7:36 in Senator John Kennedy's questioning of the
Inspector General. "Most" of the investigative decisions were made in Loretta Lynch's Department of Justice, not in the
FBI. Since that body refused to pay any attention to demands by Republican investigative committees, it's no surprise that
the investigation gave her a pass. But how do you prove it?
The
Reporters Also Committed a Crime. It is a crime for reporters to pay for leaks. Reporters can use
information volunteered by whistleblowers, but bribes are a different story. And it appears to be happening with some
regularity. The recent Department of Justice Inspector General's report warns: "We identified instances where FBI
employees improperly received benefits from reporters, including tickets to sporting events, golfing outings, drinks and
meals, and admittance to nonpublic social events." The report finds that such enticements likely led agents to leak
information. So far, the media hasn't acknowledged this possible criminal activity by reporters. The problem goes
beyond ethical violations, and it has serious implications. If reporters can legally bribe government officials, who's
to say that the reporters won't also collude with foreign governments?
The
Inspector General may be preparing us for the real #Spygate bombshells. [Scroll down] "I am upset at all
of this," Horowitz said Tuesday. "It is precisely why it cast a cloud over the investigation, it undermines confidence
in it. All of those impacts are very significant and very serious on an FBI investigation. That should never
happen and it happened because of these text messages and because of what these employees were doing." But one reason
Horowitz might have punted in his recent report is because he knows the real bombshells are yet to come: He is
investigating the FISA warrant on Trump campaign volunteer Carter Page; the cozy relationship between Justice and FBI
officials and the media, including perks for scoops; ex-FBI Director James Comey's handling of classified information; and
the potential doctoring of official documents. "We've got lots of investigations going on," Horowitz told
Rep. James Jordan (R-Ohio).
The
overlooked bombshell of the IG report. [...] is the inspector general's confirmation that classified
information contained in Clinton's emails was in fact compromised by foreign intelligence services, and that Clinton had
recklessly emailed President Barack Obama using her unsecured personal email from the territory of a hostile foreign adversary.
The
Real Lesson of the Inspector General's Report. Michael Horowitz is the Department of Justice's Inspector
General. He testified on June 18th before the Senate Judiciary Committee about his report concerning the Hillary
Clinton national security breach investigation. [...] Horowitz testified that "most" of the investigative decisions in that
investigation were made not by the FBI but by prosecutors within the Department of Justice. One might be tempted to
conclude that much of the criticism of the FBI for its decisions in the aforesaid Clinton investigation would have to be
discounted or re-examined. Perhaps. But that is not the most important conclusion.
'Extraordinary'
Strzok removal shows FBI agents in crosshairs from IG probe. Peter Strzok's abrupt removal from his FBI office
this week signaled that the Justice Department inspector general's work already is leading to consequences for bureau
officials ensnared in various probes — with potentially more repercussions to come. Strzok, who worked on
both the Clinton email and Russia probes, was escorted from the FBI on Tuesday, following a referral for further
investigation from DOJ IG Michael Horowitz. The watchdog, as part of his Clinton case review, found that Strzok and
four other FBI employees sent "hostile" anti-Trump messages on bureau devices. The FBI's Office of Professional
Responsibility is expected to further investigate the findings against the five FBI employees.
Bias and the beholder.
The Justice Department's inspector general, Michael Horowitz, and FBI Director Christopher Wray claim the 500-plus-page
report found no "documented" evidence that political bias at the FBI directly influenced the findings in the Clinton
investigation or the Justice Department's decision not to prosecute the former secretary of state. People in "flyover
country" are more likely to believe pigs can fly than they are to accept that political bias did not expose a clear intent to
damage presidential candidate Donald Trump. Why does one need a document to prove bias? If the anti-Trump
political beliefs of FBI employees, which are documented in text messages, did not influence their work then why is Director
Wray ordering all of his employees to undergo training, including, reports CNN, "instruction 'on what went wrong so these
mistakes will never be repeated.'"? Members of the media might also benefit from ethics training since the IG report
found multiple incidents of journalists doing favors for FBI agents, presumably in return for information.
The
FBI Would Be Guilty Of Clear Bias If Its Trump Investigation Were A Racial Discrimination Lawsuit. Conservatives stood
agape last week at the inspector general's refusal to state the obvious in his 568-page review of the FBI and Justice Department's
handling of the Clinton probe: A pro-Hillary political bias led officials to let her off the hook. While Michael Horowitz's
report highlighted numerous instances of anti-Trump and pro-Hillary bias, in true lawyerly fashion he focused in the conclusion on the
lack of "documentary or testimonial evidence" showing that political prejudice "directly affected" the decisions made in the
investigation. As a lawyer with a niche in employment law, this phrasing struck a chord of hilarity in me, because the methods of
proving discriminatory intent are well-established, and such direct evidence of animus (or favoritism) is not required to show that an
illegal motive drove an employment decision.
What
You Missed from Michael Horowitz's Testimony. Since the June 14 release of his 568-page report on the
department's handling of the Hillary Clinton email investigation, [Michael] Horowitz has been criticized for concluding that
the agency's decision to forego charges against Clinton was unrelated to the political views of those in charge. "We
did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations," Horowitz said, "including political bias,
directly affected the specific investigative decisions we reviewed, or that the justifications offered for these decisions
were pretextual." That finding seems to runs afoul of much of the report's content, which included a trove of text
messages showing top FBI brass favored Hillary Clinton and despised Donald Trump.
The
FBI Deliberately Ignored 'Golden Emails,' Crucial Abedin Messages And More. The Department of Justice, the
Federal Bureau of Investigation and Hillary Clinton have a HUGE Weiner problem that is even bigger than we first
realized. According to the recently released inspector general report, on September 28 and 29, 2016 the New
York office of the FBI immediately reported to the Washington headquarters its discovery of, first, 141,000 and then 350,000
emails on the laptop of Anthony Weiner — also known as "Carlos Danger," a now-convicted sex offender.
Mr. Weiner is the husband of Hillary Clinton's inseparable aide Huma Abedin.
The Buried Lede
of the Inspector General's Report. Buried in Inspector General (IG) Michael Horowitz's report on the Clinton
email investigation lies a disturbing passage concerning information obtained by the FBI alleging that Attorney General
Loretta Lynch attempted to put her thumb on the scales of justice to exonerate Hillary Clinton. "Comey said that he
also was concerned about an issue specific to Lynch," Horowitz reports. "As discussed in more detail in the classified
appendix to this report, Comey told the OIG that the FBI had obtained highly classified information in March 2016 that
included allegations of partisan bias or attempts to impede the Midyear investigation by Lynch." What, specifically,
did the "highly classified information" indicate? It is "highly classified," so we naturally remain in the dark.
What justified making the information "highly classified"? Nuclear secrets? A list of U.S. spies abroad?
War plans to invade Canada? We do not know. But in an age when the Justice Department assails words that merely
embarrass with redacting markers, the words "highly classified" provoke curiosity rather than close questions. Comey's
manner of dismissing the information does not inspire confidence.
Clinton
Email IG Report: Why Is The FBI Still Covering For Discredited Agents At The Heart Of The
'Investigation'? Two agents and an attorney at the heart of the FBI's Clinton email "investigation" expose
flagrant political bias at the heart of that probe. So why won't the FBI release their names to the public? And
given what these key players said, how did the inspector general come to conclude that the "investigation" was
unbiased? Were changes made to water it down?
The
IG Report Hides the Truth. The five-hundred page IG report was released to Congress on June 12, 2018, and
it barely scrapes the surface. It doesn't really reveal anything that the American people were not already aware had
occurred. [...] And yet, in regards to investigative decisions by FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok, the lead investigator on
the Clinton email case and the Russia investigation, and Lisa Page, an FBI attorney, Inspector General Michael Horowitz
incredibly offers us that there was "no evidence that the conclusions by the prosecutors were affected by bias or other
improper considerations."
IG
Report Confirms: Our Republic Is under Existential Threat. [The OIG report] confirms, for many of us, our
worst fear: segments of our federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies are a clear and present existential
danger to our republic. [...] The report's assessment that officials were not affected by bias is perhaps the most laughable
statement ever uttered in the annals of American political history. The I.G.'s report nakedly exposes a direct attack
on Americans who have done nothing wrong, as well as an equally disturbing coup of our national hallmark institutions of stability.
All
the times Horowitz contradicted Wray — but nobody seemed to notice. Nine times during their joint
testimony before a Senate committee on Monday, Department of Justice Inspector General (IG) Michael Horowitz contradicted FBI
Director Christopher Wray ... but nobody appeared to notice. It's an instructive example of how false narratives and
talking points in Washington are amplified by inaccurate media coverage. It's more reason you cannot necessarily
believe what's reported and repeated, no matter how many are reporting and repeating it. [...] You don't have to take my word
for it. But you'll have to read closely, because some of the statements include double-negatives.
Clinton
Emails: What the IG Report Refuses to Admit. Despite the sprawl of Justice Department inspector general
Michael Horowitz's 568-page report on the Clinton-emails investigation, there is precious little discussion of the most
important issue: The Justice Department and FBI's rationale for declining to prosecute Hillary Clinton. I believe
this is intentional. The inspector general's message is: "Despite pervasive political bias and investigative
irregularities, which I have comprehensively documented, rest assured that nothing too terrible happened here." That
silver-lining version of this dark spectacle could not have survived a searching analysis of the decision not to indict.
A
Comedy of Corruption? Or a Bureaucratic Horror Show? After discussing some of the thousands of text
messages between Peter Strzok — the top FBI honcho who ran both the pretend investigation into Hillary Clinton's
mishandling of classified materials and the first phases of Trump-Russia fantasy — and his lover Lisa Page (then
counsel to Andrew McCabe, who was the FBI's deputy director at the time), the report concludes that Strzok's decision to
focus on the counterintelligence probe of the Trump campaign rather than the Clinton email criminal investigation "led us to
conclude that we did not have confidence that Strzok's decision was free from bias." Right.
A
Closer Look At Extreme FBI Bias Revealed In OIG Report. As we digest and unpack the DOJ Inspector General's
500-page report on the FBI's conduct during the Hillary Clinton email investigation "matter,"
damning quotes from the OIG's findings have begun to circulate, leaving many to wonder exactly how Inspector General Michael
Horowitz was able to conclude: "We did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations,
including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative actions we reviewed[.]" We're sorry, that
just doesn't comport with reality whatsoever. And it really feels like the OIG report may have had a different
conclusion at some point.
The
IG Report On FBI's Clinton Probe Reveals This Saga May Be Just Getting Started. The media has focused almost
exclusively on the conclusion of the Justice Department inspector general's report on the FBI's handling of the Clinton email
probe, which found bias did not impact the probe, as well as the lack of any newly announced indictments or criminal
referrals. The goal of course being to downplay the negative findings of the report. At the same time, the press
gave, at most, passing mention to the statement Attorney General Jeff Sessions simultaneously released. But his
statement and the findings of the report make one thing clear: This isn't over.
Levin:
US Attorney for DC Should Investigate FBI. On his nationally syndicated radio talk show Friday [6/15/2018],
host Mark Levin called for United States Attorney of Washington, D.C. Jessie Liu to "investigate what took place at the FBI"
as a result of the inspector general's report that was released on Thursday. "So what I'm saying is, Ms. Liu, the
U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, should investigate what took place at the FBI," said Mark Levin. "She's got
a lot of leads, a virtual — you know — zillion leads, and she's got a document that's 600 pages in
length, almost, to help give her some guidance; impanel a grand jury, and now you can use your subpoena power."
IG
Hearing: Senator Lindsey Graham, John Kennedy and Ted Cruz Question Segments. As anticipated the majority
of the Senate Judiciary hearing was a two-step. Most of the questions presented to Inspector General Horowitz and FBI
Director Chris Wray did little to advance the understanding of the issues at hand. There was only one round of
questions, several missing senators, and no senators for the duration. The hearing wrapped up early shortly after
5:00 pm. Here's the only three question segments that approached the central issues. We discover that former
FBI Director James Comey is the subject of an ongoing investigation. We also discover there is a grand jury impaneled.
Eight
Lawmakers Demand IG Horowitz Unmask Names of Hidden FBI/DOJ Employees. Eight House Republicans have asked
Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz for the specific names of FBI employees mentioned in last week's report
on the Hillary Clinton email investigation.
Horowitz
Drops Bombshell: Hillary Clinton Was Not Formally Under FBI Investigation at Any Time in 2015-2016. On
Tuesday [6/19/2018], Inspector General Michael Horowitz testified in a joint Congressional hearing to the House Oversight and
House Judiciary panels about his review of the FBI's (mis)handling of the Clinton email investigation.
The
IG Report Was a Whitewash and Devastating All At Once. The IG report bait n' switch was just another example of
our elite shrugging in the face of indisputable evidence of its own wrongdoing. The bombshells in the IG report could
justly be classified as "thermonuclear," but remember the Comey conference back in July 2016? Its bombshells were
thermonuclear too. Integrity Boy laid out an utterly devastating case against Felonia Milhous Von Pansuit, highlighting
in damning detail her litany of crimes that would have consigned you, me, or anyone else not in the elite to a long tour in
the stony lonesome. And then that Looming Doofus concluded his lengthy summation with, "But never mind."
Inspector
General's report shows FBI is bent and broken. Question: What's the difference between the corrupt old
Boston FBI of Zip Connolly and H. Paul Rico, and the new modern FBI of James Comey, Andrew McCabe and Peter Strzok?
Answer: Nothing. Actually, there are a few differences. In Boston, all the corrupt agents wanted to do was
frame a few innocent men and set up informants for hits by their underworld masters, as well as taking hundreds of thousands
of dollars in bribes. The modern FBI agents were involved in an even more nefarious conspiracy — trying to
first fix a presidential election, and then, after that backfired, trying to overthrow the duly elected president of the
United States.
11
Quick Things To Know About The Inspector General's Report. [#1] Learn how to interpret an IG report. [...]
Those who expected demands for justice in the face of widespread evidence of political bias and poor judgment by immature
agents and executives were people unfamiliar with the purpose of IG reports. The IG is also a government bureaucrat
producing government products that are supposed to be calm and boring. In the previous report that led to Andrew
McCabe's firing as deputy director of the FBI and referral for criminal prosecution, his serial lying under oath was dryly
phrased as "lack of candor." In this report detailing widespread problems riddled throughout the Clinton email probe, the
language is similarly downplayed. That's particularly true in the executive summary, which attempts to downplay the
actual details that fill the report with evidence of poor decision-making, extreme political bias, and problematic patterns
of behavior.
FBI IG
Report: A Slap on the Wrist. Department of Justice Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz has released his
500 plus-page report, which purports to shine a light on the mishandling at top levels of the Department of Justice and Federal
Bureau of Investigation of the 2016 investigation into Hillary Clinton's use of a private e-mail server while she served as
Secretary of State under former President Obama. Such mishandling included violations of Department of Justice standards
and FBI protocols. The report from the Department of Justice's Office of the Inspector General ("OIG") criticized certain
actions and decisions of former FBI Director James Comey, together with those of other senior FBI officials who were involved
in the probe, including former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe. Mr. McCabe is already the subject of an earlier
criminal referral from the OIG for his alleged unauthorized leaks to the media and lying to federal investigators about his
media contacts. Special FBI agent Peter Stzrok and Lisa Page, an attorney who has since left the FBI, were targeted in
this report for their blatantly anti-Trump text messages. Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch was also criticized for
exercising bad judgment in connection with her infamous tarmac meeting with Bill Clinton.
A professional
review of the IG report. The more I read about this, the more I admire IG Michael Horowitz. I have been
involved in corporate governance and compliance for almost 20 years and I've never seen a better example of self-preservation
than the OIG report.
The
IG Report: They're Guilty, but It's Okay. First we were told that Comey was a straight shooter whom we
could trust. Then we were told the same about Mueller, Rosenstein, and now the IG. Yet in every case we've discovered
that they are biased political actors who put the interests of the Deep State and the Democratic Party ahead of their sworn
duty to uphold the law. It's time for all conservatives to acknowledge that there are few if any honest people at the
top levels of the FBI or the DoJ.
The Deep
State and Tyranny. The issue of political bias, which the IG report scanted, has to be understood in the larger
nature of the large-scale bureaucratic public institutions that comprise the Deep State. In other words, the structure
and functioning of the institution itself creates a bias that selects progressive employees. The bias insidiously
becomes a second nature of which they often are no more conscious than a fish is that it's wet.
Justice
Department IG is looking into James Comey leaks. The Justice Department's Office of Inspector General is
looking into former FBI Director James Comey's decision to give his personal memos to a friend outside the government.
"We received a referral on that from the FBI. We are handling that referral and we will issue a report when the matter is
completed," Inspector General Michael Horowitz said during testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee. The hearing
came days after Horowitz's office released a near 600-page report on the FBI's handling of the FBI's investigation into
Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server.
Comey Under Investigation
For Handling Of Classified Information. Former FBI director James Comey is under investigation for mishandling
classified information, DOJ inspector general Michael Horowitz revealed Monday [6/18/2018]. He is specifically under
investigation for his handling of memos he wrote about interactions with President Trump while FBI director.
Why the OIG
Report Should Scare You. The Justice Department's tepid OIG report, with its risible assertion that there was
no political bias in the FBI's Clinton email probe, suggests that it was written by people afraid to tell the unvarnished
truth about the conduct of the federal government's police apparatus, an agency that openly defies congressional oversight
and has participated in a vendetta against a sitting president. The FBI's leadership clearly hopes that the Democrats
will win majorities in Congress and put a halt to the investigations into its multifarious abuses of power. The OIG is
loath to face the ruthless reprisals that would inevitably follow such a disaster.
Crime and Punishment.
The Justice Department Inspector General's report on the investigation of Hillary Clinton's unsecured personal email server
laid bare a widespread pattern of conduct that "cast a cloud" over the FBI. The report incites the inference that the Bureau
is a severely corrupted organization, tainted and warped by unconstitutional ambitions to meddle in electoral matters.
Although Inspector General Michael Horowitz asserted he lacked "documentary and testamentary evidence" to prove political
bias ruled in making decisions of great political consequence, clearly he did not mean bias was not present. On what
the report presented, it is almost certain that the FBI, at the deliberate direction of its leaders and senior Justice
Department officials, intervened completely improperly in political matters. The inspector general led the country to
the edge of the decision, and will presumably make a number of criminal referrals for possible indictments, as he did after
his initial report.
Insubordination
and bias at FBI. Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz's 500-page report covers plenty, but it
can be distilled to two words he uses to describe the Federal Bureau of Investigation during the 2016 election:
insubordination and bias. Two terms that are chilling in connection with such a powerful agency. That won't be
the message from Democrats and most of the press, who will focus on a few episodes they will claim cost Hillary Clinton an
election. Watch for them to blame former FBI Director James Comey, whom the report faults for "a serious error of
judgment," for having "concealed information" from superiors, and for "violation of or disregard for" departmental and
bureau policies.
Obama
single-handedly ruined the FBI and the DOJ. Naturally, the political-media left that crowds out saner voices on
television was quick as jackrabbits to announce that the FBI was vindicated by the I.G. report that was released on Thursday
[6/14/2018]. [...] But one only has to scroll through the list of columns posted at RealClearPolitics on Friday to grasp the
abyss between the left and right re: the report. The report contained an executive summary that said, "We found no
documentary evidence of political bias." That means they did not find written confessions by all those Trump-hating
higher-ups at the once-great law enforcement agency. But the five-hundred-page body of the report is chock-full of
extreme political anti-Trump mendacity. Why the hundreds of texts between several like-minded agents that reek of
profound bias against Trump are not documentary evidence is a mystery. [...] This I.G. report is only half, or maybe only
a third of the whole story.
IG
Report: Peter Strzok Statements About Weiner/Abedin Laptop Conflict With FBI Claims About Weiner/Abedin Laptop.
General David Petraeus was arrested for leaving his classified schedule on mistress Paula Broadwell's nightstand. Kristian
Saucier was arrested for taking a classified photograph on a submarine. Anthony Weiner and Huma Abedin had dozens of classified
Clinton emails on a laptop and... There is a great deal of inconsistent application of law surrounding classified
information. There is also a great deal of fatigue surrounding discussion of those inconsistent applications.
Contradictions, inconsistency and obtuse justifications are as rampant in our midst as the political narratives shaping
them. Perhaps that's by design. [Inexplicable ellipsis in original.]
Mark
Levin: "FBI interfered with the election worse than the Russians could have ever dreamed of doing!" Mark
Levin gave a fantastic interview last night on Hannity where he gave his reaction to the IG report on the Hillary
investigation. As you can judge from the title, Levin feels this report is a huge indictment against Comey, saying
there was collusion, obstruction, and insubordination. And I love the line I used in the title, where Levin emphatically
said the "FBI interfered with the election worse than the Russians could have ever dreamed!" [Video clip]
IG
Report: FBI Lawyer #1 Tashina Gauhar and The Huma/Weiner Laptop Issues. One of the information issues
with the IG report is that it's written entirely from an insider's perspective. Therefore without an understanding of
how divisions within Main Justice related to the discussed activity within FBI main DC offices it can be very confusing to
understand. The 'insider narration' makes it difficult to see what happened with the Huma Abedin and Anthony Weiner
laptop; and how the Clinton emails were discovered. However, because the issue is so important the IG report spends
three chapters on this time-frame between September 28th and October 29th, 2016; and ultimately the next day,
Oct. 30th, when a search warrant was executed for the laptop content.
IG
Report: "We do not have confidence that Strzok's decision was free from bias". FBI Agent Peter Strzok
walks like a biased duck, looks like a biased duck, sounds like a biased duck, has all the same characteristics of a biased
duck, and took the exact action a biased duck would take; therefore "We do not have confidence" FBI Agent Peter Strzok is not
a biased duck.
IG
Report: FBI Officials Accepted Bribes From Media. On Page Xii of the IG report the Department of Justice
Office of Inspector General (DOJ-OIG) highlights numerous FBI officials who accepted bribes from multiple media outlets
including: "tickets to sporting events", "golf outings", "drinks and meals" as well as exclusive invitations and admission to
"nonpublic social events".
Notes on the
IG Report. No one can read the vicious, hateful, over-the-top partisan vitriol that FBI employees directed
against Donald Trump — Strzok and Page are not the only ones quoted in the IG's report — and give any
credence to that claim. These high-ranking FBI agents were politicized to the core and were determined to do anything
they could to secure their candidate's election. Failing that, they plunged into the faux Russia election story in
hopes of discrediting President Trump or even, as they explicitly discussed, bringing about his impeachment. The IG's
report exposes a corrupt and politicized FBI and Department of Justice. And so far, we are seeing only half of
the story, at most. No one has yet looked into the Democrats' "Russia" tale or any partisan corruption linked to
Bob Mueller's farcical "investigation."
Crime and Punishment.
The Justice Department Inspector General's report on the investigation of Hillary Clinton's unsecured personal email server
laid bare a widespread pattern of conduct that "cast a cloud" over the FBI. The report incites the inference that the Bureau
is a severely corrupted organization, tainted and warped by unconstitutional ambitions to meddle in electoral matters.
Although Inspector General Michael Horowitz asserted he lacked "documentary and testamentary evidence" to prove political
bias ruled in making decisions of great political consequence, clearly he did not mean bias was not present. On what
the report presented, it is almost certain that the FBI, at the deliberate direction of its leaders and senior Justice
Department officials, intervened completely improperly in political matters. The inspector general led the country to
the edge of the decision, and will presumably make a number of criminal referrals for possible indictments, as he did after
his initial report.
IG
Report: FBI Agent Peter Strzok Sent Weiner Sealed Indictment To His Personal Email. One of the
interesting aspects of the IG report is the documented use of personal email by participants within the FBI "small group"
Mid-Year-Exam (MYE) team. One of those documented examples involves FBI Agent Peter Strzok downloading the content of
the sealed Anthony Weiner Indictment, October 29, 2016, to his personal email address. Unauthorized extraction
of a 'sealed SDNY indictment', and transmission to a non-secure system, is a felony.
PBS's
Mark Shields Sounds Silly: 'Very Sparse' Evidence of FBI Bias Against Trump. You could tell the PBS
NewsHour didn't want to discuss the Inspector General's report on the FBI's egregious failure to live up to its own
standards in the 2016 election cycle. Anchor Judy Woodruff started the Friday week-in-review segment with the North
Korea summit, and then began the FBI analysis with a no-bias-found verdict: "Very tough on James Comey, saying he was
insubordinate, some other tough criticism of him, but, ultimately, 500 pages concluded that the way the FBI handled it
didn't demonstrate bias."
Comey's
FBI Was Protecting The Legitimacy Of The Presumed Clinton Presidency. In late October of 2016 James Comey knew
Donald Trump's candidacy was as dead as a doornail. That must be distinctly understood or nothing wonderful can come
from the story I am going to relate. Time soothes the edges of old emotions. We forget the shock of that election
night. Almost two years now of articles and TV takes, even books, make Trump's election seem understandable, even
sometimes inevitable. But that's not how it was then. When FBI director Comey and the FBI dropped their late
October Anthony Weiner surprise, they did so fully confident that Hillary Clinton would win. What we now know for
certain from the Department of Justice inspector general report that came out Thursday is that the FBI chose to disclose the
Weiner email fiasco to protect a Clinton presidency, a foregone conclusion, from potential claims from Trump that the FBI had
rigged the election.
Decoding
the Horowitz Report on 'bias'. We are in the midst of a spin battle over the inspector general's report issued
yesterday [6/14/2018]. Because inspectors general cannot release their reports without giving those named within it a
chance to contest it, and must be able to defend every single word of it, they must stick to facts and completely documentable
conclusions. Inductive reasoning, looking at large patterns of facts and drawing conclusions, does not survive such a
process. The result is a report that is written in a kind of code. Kimberly Strassel of the Wall Street Journal
decodes the Horowitz Report on bias in a tweet thread on the subject. Her first tweet demolishes the "no bias" meme
being pushed by Democrats, including the mainstream media.
Why
Did FBI Assign Same Agents to Clinton & Trump Cases? Why did the FBI assign the same agents who investigated
Hillary Clinton's emails to look into allegations of Russian collusion with Donald Trump's campaign? Given the
overlapping timetable of both cases, the decision appears not only peculiar but harmful to the efforts. The inspector
general notes in his report the repeated excuse that the importance of the Russia investigation led to the crucial delay in
the reopening of the Clinton email investigation after the discovery of former Secretary of State's missing messages on
Anthony Weiner's laptop. The bureau assigning different agents and lawyers to each case, the IG suggests, likely would
have prevented the one-month delay in looking into the laptop that came, crucially, just days prior to the 2016 election.
Clinton
Foundation Never Probed, Frivolous Suit Brought Against Trump. On the day the Office of the Inspector General
released a report about egregious DoJ/FBI behavior, the New York Attorney General announced a $2.8 million lawsuit against
the Trump's Charitable Foundation. Notice how the Feds and the NY AG work together? This is a civil suit and they
want to shut down the charity. The fact is the Foundation raised 18.8 million dollars while giving 19.2 million to
charity with virtually zero expenses. This is a frivolous suit meant to hurt the President and counteract the OIG report.
Insubordination and Bias at FBI. Justice Department
Inspector General Michael Horowitz's 500-page report covers plenty, but it can be distilled to two words he uses to describe
the Federal Bureau of Investigation during the 2016 election: insubordination and bias. Two terms that are chilling in
connection with such a powerful agency. That won't be the message from Democrats and most of the press, who will focus
on a few episodes they will claim cost Hillary Clinton an election. Watch for them to blame former FBI Director James
Comey, whom the report faults for "a serious error of judgment," for having "concealed information" from superiors, and for
"violation of or disregard for" departmental and bureau policies.
Media
fawning over Comey, McCabe looks silly after stinging IG report. For those journalists who have covered law
enforcement for decades, there was some discomfort watching a doting news media bestow adoration earlier this year upon the
FBI's disgraced top two former bosses. FBI Director James Comey, terminated for violating department guidelines and
explicit instructions, was given the royal treatment when his memoir came out this spring. Deputy Director Andrew
McCabe, fired for lying to his own federal investigators, was portrayed as a whistleblower akin to Mark Felt, another former
top FBI official who exposed the very real Watergate scandal.
[There
is] No Obstruction If [a] Boss Cans [an] Insubordinate Subordinate. Now that Justice Department Inspector-General
Michael Horowitz has released his nearly 600-page report on his investigation of FBI practices during the course of the Hillary
Clinton email probe, one thing is more settled then ever[:] former FBI director James Comey had to be fired as fast as
possible. The IG's findings could not have been more clear: Comey was consistently insubordinate.
That is precisely the word used in the report: insubordinate. No company, no business, no organization can function
effectively with highly placed but subordinate people working at odds with their superiors, their management, their bosses.
Comey
responds to IG report. Former FBI Director James Comey led the FBI into crisis, scandal and disgrace.
Fired from the job by President Trump, he presented himself as a model of ethical leadership with a best-selling how-to
book. The IG report released yesterday documents his failures, notes his duplicity, calls him out for his high
handedness, and gives us his endless self-justification. In the tweet below responding to the IG report, we see that he
is a man of many devices, one of which is a public relations strategy to ward off shame. He could write an authentic
classic on the high art of political pretense.
Sex,
lies and betrayal at the FBI. If Jeff Sessions and Christopher Wray want to clean house at the FBI, they'll be
well advised to pack a good lunch. Cleaning this house will be an all-day job. The agency under James B. Comey
has been more corrupt than we thought. The long-awaited findings of the inspector general at the Justice Department
were finally released Thursday, and it reveals clearly that officials high up in the food chain were out to protect Hillary
Clinton by any means necessary.
The FBI Hates
Trump — and His Voters, Too. Several passages in the Justice Department's Inspector General report
on the agency's handling of the Clinton email investigation illustrate the FBI's culture of contempt for Trump, before and
after the election. Comments from key law enforcement officials — lawyers and investigators —
about Trump were vile, demeaning, and childish. But their ridicule was not isolated to Trump. These public
servants were unsparing in their contempt for the voters — the very people who fund their salaries and pensions.
FBI
Employee to FBI Attorney for Russia Investigation: 'YOU PROMISED' Trump Would Never Get Elected. The day after
Donald Trump was elected president, an FBI employee engaged in an "instant message" conversation with an FBI attorney who had
worked on the Clinton email investigation, then moved to the Russian meddling investigation, and would later become an
attorney working with Special Counsel Robert Mueller on that investigation. Speaking of Trump's election, the FBI
employee told the FBI lawyer: "You promised me this wouldn't happen. YOU PROMISED." Later, in the same instant
messaging exchange, according to the inspector general's report released today, the FBI attorney responded: "I am just
devastated. I can't wait until I can leave and just shut off the world for the next four days."
Tying
Hillary's Emails to the Russian 'Collusion' Probe. The 568-page report released Thursday by Department of
Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz may help explain why the investigation of Hillary Clinton's emails and the probe
of the Donald Trump campaign team's possible ties to Russia appear to bleed into each other. The IG report, titled
"Review of Various Actions by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Department of Justice in Advance of the 2016 Election,"
details the FBI's investigation and eventual closure of the case regarding Clinton's use of a private, non-government email
account, and her private server. The report devotes particular attention to former FBI director James Comey's July 5,
2016 statement exonerating Hillary Clinton from criminal wrongdoing in her handling of classified intelligence.
IG report? I
want indictments. The FBI is run by people who think they are above the law. They may be right.
Missing from this document are the indictments. Jimmy the Weasel Comey should be arrested and charged with obstruction
of justice, conspiracy, and sundry other crimes like the common criminal he is. Arrogant Andrew McCabe, Peter the
Politician Strzok, Lisa Page, and a whole slew of other agents need to be arrested, jailed, and charged with every crime
possible. This calls for a Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organization prosecution because these boys and girls turned a
federal agency into their private protection racket. We know this was going on for years because there is a casual,
business-as-usual air to the way they conducted their crimes. The record shows this.
FBI
Employee: 'Trump's Supporters Are All Poor, Uneducated, Lazy POS'. The Justice Department's Office of Inspector
General report on the FBI handling of the Clinton email investigation reveals a bureau staffer made remarks attacking the
"Deplorables," the voters who elected Donald Trump. [...] When Justice Department investigators asked if the comments
demonstrated a political bias, the attorney said, "personal political feelings or beliefs... in no way impacted" the
staffer's work undertaken on either the Clinton email probe or the Russia investigation.
With
FBI's boiling hate for voters exposed, America dodged a bullet by electing Trump. One of the biggest takeaways
from the Department of Justice's 500-page inspector general report is how deep the contempt for voters is among the Federal
Bureau of Investigation's leadership elite. The text messages are incredible. [...] It's so bad that the I.G. report
said these remarks, just oozing with contempt for the American public, led to an atmosphere that "has brought discredit to
themselves, sowed doubt about the FBI's handling of the Midyear investigation, and impacted the reputation of the FBI."
The
IG's Report May Be Half-Baked. You've got to hand it to Michael Horowitz: The Justice Department
inspector general's much-anticipated report on the Clinton-emails investigation may be half-baked, but if it is, it is the
most comprehensive, meticulously detailed, carefully documented, thoughtfully reasoned epic in the history of half-bakery.
Why say do I say the report "may be half-baked"? Why don't I just come out and declare, "The report is half-baked"?
Well, I figure if I write this column in the IG's elusive style, we'll have the Rosetta Stone we need to decipher the report.
Justice Leadership
Is Not Coming Clean. Despite misleading headlines, the inspector general's report on the FBI's investigation
into Hillary Clinton's emails shows a powerful law enforcement agency hobbled by bias and dishonesty. The press has
seized on the IG's statement that he "did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations,
including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative decisions we reviewed." But that is simply
Inspector Generalese for, "No one confessed or left a paper trail."
Open Up the Horowitz Secret Appendix. Inspector
General Michael Horowitz's report points to multiple irregularities in FBI chief James Comey's actions in the 2016 election
campaign, sees no evidence of political bias, but never really gets to the bottom of why Mr. Comey played the role he
did. Mr. Comey may have been worried that a Justice Department decision not to prosecute Mrs. Clinton would
lack credibility, but it was in no sense his obligation to solve this problem. It simply was not the FBI chief's
job to relieve the Obama administration of the need to sell its decision to the electorate. This is why we have
elections. It's what political accountability is all about. This is where Russia enters in. It is highly
absurd at this point to keep this information secret, as Mr. Horowitz does in a classified appendix.
How
political bias infected FBI Trump, Clinton probes. [Scroll down] Then there was FBI Attorney 2. His case
is particularly newsworthy because Horowitz reported — it was not known before — that, like Strzok and Page, FBI
Attorney 2 was removed from the Mueller investigation when the inspector general made Mueller aware of FBI Attorney 2's internal
communications. "FBI Attorney 2 left the special counsel's investigation and returned to the FBI in late February 2018, shortly
after the IG provided the special counsel with some of the instant messages discussed in this section," the report says. On
Oct. 28, 2016, the day the FBI's then-director, James Comey, announced the reopening of the Clinton investigation, FBI
Attorney 2 messaged four other FBI employees, saying, "I mean, I never really liked the Republic anyway" or similar messages.
The
IG Report Was a Whitewash and Devastating All At Once. [Christopher] Wray's ruined agency's best n' brightest
conspired to undo the results of an election to ensure that the liberal politician who wouldn't derail their gravy train
would take office, but hey, a couple hours of diversity classes will fix that right up. I know I feel much better
knowing that these bureaucratic superstars are finally going to get some training to inform them that trying to use their
power as federal law enforcement agents to swing an election to their preferred political party is wrong. Apparently,
that was previously unclear.
The Real Problem With the
OIG Report. [Scroll down] The DOJ's long-standing and well-established practice is to make no public
statement regarding the outcome of an investigation unless and until it results in criminal charges. But, in the
Clinton "matter," it was decided that there had to be a public announcement of the investigative findings even though she was
to be exonerated. Consequently, there wasn't enough time for the investigation to be thorough and complete. But,
if the FBI and DOJ wanted to "avoid influencing the political process," then why have any public announcement of the
investigation's findings? By its very nature, the announcement, regardless of the investigation's outcome, would
necessarily impact the political process and affect the fortunes of Clinton and Donald Trump. As such, a public
announcement would be intrinsically and inescapably a political act.
IG
Report: Disciplinary Action Recommended For Five FBI Agents — Oh, And Bureau Employees Got Free Stuff From
Reporters. Well, the report from the Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz is here.
Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, former FBI Director James Comey, and ex-Deputy Director Andrew McCabe were placed
under the microscope for their activities during the 2016 election, namely the Hillary Clinton email probe and the
investigation into the Clinton Foundation. Katie and Guy broke down the major nuggets of the report, notably how
Mr. Comey went way outside the protocol during the Clinton email probe. The IG report also noted that the
arguments for why the ex-FBI chief informed Congress on October 28, 2016, that the FBI would be essentially rebooting
the email probe after new emails were found on Huma Abedin's laptop, Abedin is a top Clinton aide, were unpersuasive.
Meet
the Other Amorous FBI Staffers Who Texted About the Clinton Email Investigation. Criticism of James Comey is
nothing new — it's one of the few things that both Republicans and Democrats can agree on. Which made the
headline takeaway of the Department of Justice Inspector General's report — that Comey deviated from FBI
norms — something less than a surprise. But the Comey story isn't even close to being the most interesting
or instructive finding by the IG. Perhaps the most shocking information in the IG's report is the revelation that Lisa
Page and Peter Strzok were not the only amorous agents with a habit of texting. There were also "Agent 1" and "Agent 5,"
who were involved in the Clinton investigation and, according to the IG's report "were in a relationship at the time and are now
married." Their communications make for a searing indictment of the culture of the FBI and paint a portrait of the
investigation into Hillary Clinton's email practices as fiasco.
Inspector
General's Report: FBI May Have Covered up Weiner Laptop to Help Clinton. Democrats have long complained
that then-FBI Director James Comey's announcement in late October 2016 that he was re-opening the investigation into Hillary
Clinton's emails cost them the presidential election. But the report of the Department of Justice Inspector General,
released Thursday, shows that the FBI may actually have neglected an investigation into emails found on Anthony Weiner's
laptop in an effort to stop Donald Trump from winning.
Comey
Broke From FBI Procedures in Clinton Probe, Watchdog Finds. Former FBI Director James Comey was "insubordinate"
in handling the probe into Hillary Clinton, damaging the bureau and the Justice Department's image of impartiality even
though he wasn't motivated by politics, the department's watchdog found. Although the report issued Thursday [6/14/2018]
by Inspector General Michael Horowitz doesn't deal directly with Special Counsel Robert Mueller's inquiry into Russia meddling
in the 2016 U.S. election and possible collusion with those around Donald Trump, the president and his Republican allies in
Congress were primed to seize on it as evidence of poor judgment and anti-Trump bias within the Federal Bureau of
Investigation and the Justice Department.
Texts
reveal disgraced FBI agent told lover 'we'll stop' Trump. A top FBI agent involved in the investigation of
Hillary Clinton's e-mails told a colleague in 2016 that "we'll stop" Donald Trump from becoming president, according to the
Justice Department's inspector general. The explosive comment came during an exchange of text messages between agent
Peter Strzok and his lover, FBI lawyer Lisa Page, in August 2016, IG Michael Horowitz's report revealed Thursday [6/14/2018].
[...] Despite the stunning anti-Trump comments, Horowitz said he found no evidence that the pair's political views carried
over into their work on the investigations into Russian election meddling and Clinton's improper use of a private e-mail
server while she was secretary of state.
'Viva Le Resistance':
Mueller Team Attorney Sent Anti-Trump Texts. An FBI attorney who worked on the special counsel's Russia
investigation until earlier this year sent anti-Trump text messages to a colleague, including one exclaiming: "Viva le
Resistance." The attorney's comments are revealed in a Justice Department inspector general's report released on
Thursday [6/14/2018]. The lawyer is not identified, but he worked on the Hillary Clinton email investigation and was the
FBI's lead attorney on the investigation into Russian election interference. He was assigned to special counsel Robert
Mueller's investigation soon after it began in May 2017 and left in late February of this year after some of his private
messages were shared with the special counsel.
The report from Inspector General David Horowitz, December 9, 2019:
Sara
Carter: If Declassified, Elements of FISA Abuse Report Will "Turn the Whole Horowitz Report on its Head".
On Monday night's "Hannity," investigative journalist Sara A. Carter said that two Republican U.S. senators have asked
Attorney General William Barr to declassify certain information from the Justice Department inspector general's "FISA abuse"
report released to the public on December 9. DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz found numerous errors and
omissions in the FBI's applications for surveillance warrants on former Trump campaign adviser Carter W. Page but no evidence
of political motives in the launching of "Crossfire Hurricane," the FBI's counterintelligence investigation into the 2016
Trump campaign. The origin of "Crossfire" is under criminal investigation by U.S. Attorney for the District of
Connecticut John Durham. Durham is believed to be probing events which occurred earlier than July 31, 2016, the date
the FBI has claimed it opened its probe into the campaign.
The Swamp is un-lovely, dark and deep.
Inspector
General Report Shows Special Counsel Replicated FBI Abuses. Shortly after the release of the special counsel
report last year, I posited that Robert Mueller's failure to investigate whether Russia interfered with the 2016 presidential
election by feeding dossier author Christopher Steele disinformation established that Mueller was either incompetent or a
political hack. Now, with the release of the inspector general's report on FISA abuse, we know the answer: He was
both. The IG's report on the U.S. Department of Justice and FBI's handling of the Carter Page surveillance applications
established 17 significant inaccuracies and omissions in the FISA application and renewals. (Eighteen if you include the one
the IG missed). The 400-page report also established that the special counsel's office was complicit in the FISA abuse, the
probe was a witch hunt, and Mueller's report was a cover-up for systematic government malfeasance.
Source
Identified — IG FISA Report Identifies One Confidential Human Source Leading to Audit of FBI
Activity. Throughout the 478-page IG report on FBI FISA misconduct there are several mentions of Confidential
Human Sources (CHSs) who were either officially "tasked" or unofficially involved in the 2016 FBI investigation of the Trump
campaign. The inspector general review of the CHS activity is fraught with examples of the FBI denying many of the
numerous "non-tasked" sources were acting in an official capacity. The inspector general's office knowing the FBI were
lacking candor is one thing; however, proving that is another matter entirely. The 'having to take them at their
word' dynamic appears throughout the chapters on the use of Confidential Human Sources.
IG
Report Hints James Comey Was In On FBI's FISA Misconduct. When the Department of Justice inspector general
released his report on Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act abuse, coverage focused on the top-line findings contained in
the executive summary. Then the news cycle whizzed by, leaving many details discussed throughout the 480-page tome
unexplored. One significant gap in media coverage concerns the potential complicity of former FBI Director James Comey
in the FISA abuse — a possibility the IG report hints at in several spots. The first suggestion that
something was amiss with Comey's conduct came early in Inspector General Michael Horowitz's report, when the IG's office
spoke of the methodology underlying the FISA investigation.
Gregg
Jarrett: Barr's Fox News interview should have Brennan, Steele calling their attorneys. Several key
players in the origins of the Russia investigation might want to contact their lawyers following Attorney General William
Barr's appearance this week on Fox News, political analyst Gregg Jarrett suggested Thursday night on "Hannity." "I
would have my criminal lawyers on speed dial," Jarrett told host Sean Hannity, "because [Barr] made it pretty much clear he
is going after not just the intel agencies but private actors." Likely Barr targets, Jarrett said, include former CIA
Director John Brennan, former journalist and Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn Simpson and former British spy Christopher Steele.
AG
Bill Barr Full Interview Covering Horowitz Report, Durham Investigation and Impeachment. Attorney General Bill
Barr had an extensive sit down interview with Fox News host Martha MacCallum on Wednesday, December 18th. The interview
was broadcast this evening [12/19/2019]. [Video clip]
The New American Stasi.
[Scroll down] Last week, the Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz revealed that we have a New
American Stasi. As a Member of Congress, I had voted against the renewal of the Patriot Act, a main reason was the
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court. I could not, and still cannot, fathom having a "secret" court that
has the power to grant warrants to conduct surveillance, spying, against American citizens without their knowledge, or
ability to defend themselves. That is a complete and utter violation of our Fourth Amendment rights, yet this is what
happened. And last week, Mr. Horowitz confirmed my greatest concerns: Seventeen inaccuracies and omissions
were made to this secret court in order to obtain warrants to conduct surveillance, spying, against American citizens.
And yes, the entire Mueller special investigation which was enacted for one reason, but veered greatly off course, and
certain political opposition have found themselves in sentenced to prison. This is how things happen when progressive
socialists are in power. What perhaps started with every good intention of keeping us safe from Islamic jihadists and
terrorist attacks is now being used against political opponents.
IG
report suggests FBI might cheat on all its FISA wiretap requests. Former FBI Director James Comey initially
portrayed last week's damning report on the bureau's probe of Russiagate as a vindication. This week, Comey admitted
that Inspector General Michael Horowitz discovered "real sloppiness," which is "concerning." That characterization does
not begin to cover the problems described by Horowitz, which this week prompted a highly unusual public rebuke from the court
that reviews secret warrant applications under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). The FISA court called the
FBI's conduct "antithetical to the heightened duty of candor" that applies in such cases. Comey may take comfort in the
fact that Horowitz didn't find political bias. The rest of us can hardly be reassured by the implication that the FBI
is inept rather than corrupt.
Brit
Hume: One of the wonders of modern media is its failure to see through Adam Schiff. Adam Schiff claimed
over the weekend that he shouldn't be held accountable for his own previous efforts to discount the numerous errors in the
FBI's FISA application on Carter Page. "I'm certainly willing to admit that the Inspector General found serious abuses
of FISA that I was unaware of," Schiff told Fox News' Chris Wallace. He added, "Had I known of them, Chris, yes, I
would have called out the FBI at the same time. But I think it's only fair to judge what we knew at the time, not what
would be revealed two years later." As Ed wrote yesterday, Schiff's explanation for his failure to see what was
presented in the Nunes memo is "nonsense on stilts." I wrote a comparison between the information contained in the Nunes memo
and the conclusions from the Horowitz report here. Every major point of the memo was substantiated by Horowitz' report
while Schiff's response memo was cut off at the knees.
Rush
Limbaugh Says 'IG Report has Totally Exposed Nadler as a Full-Fledged, 100 Percent Liar'. Conservative radio
host Rush Limbaugh just slammed Democrat Congressman Jerry Nadler for not showing up at the House Rules Committee hearing
Tuesday, adding that the inspector general report has now "exposed" Nadler as a liar. "The IG report has totally
exposed Nadler as a full-fledged, 100% liar," Limbaugh said on his program Tuesday [12/17/2019]. [...] Limbaugh said the
Democrats on the Rules Committee are "continuing to lie through their teeth about the supposed misconduct of Donald Trump."
Brennan
admits 'there were mistakes made' in FISA applications, suggests FBI was 'overly aggressive'. Former CIA
Director John Brennan, an outspoken critic of President Trump, acknowledged Tuesday that "there were mistakes made" in the
highly controversial Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) application process during the Russia investigation as
reported by Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz. Appearing on MSNBC, Brennan was asked by host Chris
Hayes about "abuses" uncovered by Horowitz, who claimed he found 17 significant errors in the renewed FISA applications into
former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, while Horowitz was a member of the Obama administration.
Nunes
letter to Schiff: 'As part of your rehabilitation, it's crucial that you admit you have a problem'.
Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, is riding high following last week's
release of the Justice Department Inspector General report on FBI abuse of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
In a letter Sunday [12/15/2019], Nunes told committee chairman Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., that he's "in need of
rehabilitation," given the report's findings, according to Fox News. Taking considerable heat in the media after
voicing concerns about the FBI's reliance on the discredited Christopher Steele dossier funded by Hillary Clinton's campaign
to obtain a FISA warrant to surveil former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, Nunes was vindicated by the IG report.
Shifty
Schiff Tries to Play Dumb: The IG Report Revealed Things We Had No Idea About Two Years Ago. For more
than two years, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) told us President Donald Trump has done something wrong. He didn't
know exactly what but he just knew Trump was involved in some sort of wrong doing. First, it was Russia!
Russia! Russia! Once Special Counsel Robert Mueller proved that the Trump campaign did not collude with
Russia, he latched onto Trump's call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. And that's how we're currently at the
impeachment fiasco that the Democrats are ramming through the House. What's interesting, however, is Schiff is suddenly
changing his tune. During a Sunday morning interview [11/15/2019] with George Stephanopoulos, Schiff said that
Inspector General Michael Horowitz "found things" that the American people didn't know about in 2017.
IG
Report Proves Adam Schiff Has Been Lying About Spygate Since The Beginning. On Friday, Democrats on the House
Judiciary Committee approved two articles of impeachment against President Trump: abuse of power and obstruction of
Congress. The committee vote sends the question to the full House, with a vote expected later this week. That
fast timeline won't allow for much consideration of the question, however, forcing folks to rely on House Intelligence
Committee Chairman Adam Schiff's 300-page report detailing his committee's "impeachment inquiry." But following last week'
release of the inspector general's report on FISA abuse that proved nearly every sentence wrong in Schiff's last high-profile
report (his self-titled "Correcting the Record — The Russia Investigation"), Schiff's work product should be
deemed worthless.
Horowitz
Report Exposes Soviet-Level Wrongdoing. The Democrats long have insisted that the Hillary Clinton-sponsored
Steele dossier was not used to justify FBI spying on the 2016 Trump campaign as part of an investigation into alleged ties to
the Russian government. The American people were told that the intelligence apparatus had legitimate concerns about
potential collusion and that authorities took appropriate steps to investigate Donald Trump's associates. The evidence
contained in the report, however, tells a very different story. Not only did the FBI agents trust the findings of the
now-discredited dossier, but they also used it to file the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) application to
wiretap the Trump presidential campaign.
The
Media Has Some Apologizing to Do After the IG Report. Thanks to the Department of Justice Inspector General's
report, we now know for certain what has been, for those paying attention, fairly obvious. The Steele dossier played a
central role in the genesis of the Russia hoax and was used to justify extensive spying on former naval officer and Annapolis
graduate Carter Page. The top two leaders of the FBI were closely involved in this fiasco. Other powerful people
knew what was happening and lied to cover it up. That all was confirmed by the IG report. The report was a
disaster for the credibility of top leaders in Barack Obama's FBI, and it's also a big problem for the American news media.
Schiff
and Complicit Media Are Due For a Reckoning After IG Report Exposed Their Lies. Now that the inspector general
report on FISA abuse has vindicated the work of Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA), the former chairman of the House Intelligence
Committee, and thoroughly debunked the fraudulent conspiracy theories and smears of the current chairman Adam Schiff, many
conservatives are crying out for retribution. At the very least, Schiff should face an ethics complaint for lying in
his memo, American Commitment President Phil Kerpen says.
Trapped
by the Ghosts of Corrupt Administrations Past. It's little wonder sane people have taken the Left's messaging
strategy regarding impeachment and the Justice Department inspector general's new report as mere political inanity and
mendacity. Government officials, past and present, who fear potential indictment for abuse of power for personal and
partisan gain, their legal "experts" at Lawfare, their collusion media cohorts, and social media's rabid pack of regressive
mouth-breathers who do little more than parrot them are not advancing a typical political argument. They are proffering
a preemptive legal defense. For the Left, preparing briefs for a prospective court of law rather than making good faith
arguments in the court of public opinion is a necessary gambit, due to U.S. Attorney John Durham's probe into the Russia-gate lie.
What
the IG Report Missed, and Where to Find It. The I.G. Report is not truthful in its description of the reasons
behind opening the Crossfire Hurricane investigation. This might be not Horowitz's fault — his main sources
were the Spygate perpetrators themselves. They were familiar with investigative techniques and thus coordinated their
testimonies, inclusive of media leaks, accordingly. There is only one other relevant factor mentioned in the I.G.
report regarding the opening the Crossfire Hurricane investigation: the "cyber-intrusion investigation" of the DNC leaks
and alleged hacks. These two separate incidents were incorrectly mixed and attributed to the Russian government.
But the report doesn't disclose when this cyber-intrusion investigation started or how it was predicated. [...] The I.G.
Report mentions neither CrowdStrike nor any of its officers. For comparison, FFG is mentioned 144 times, and even
Fusion GPS is mentioned 138 times, but CrowdStrike is completely missing.
The Inspector
General's Report. The conduct of former deputy attorneys general Sally Yates and Rod Rosenstein "were
inconsistent with or undercut the assertions contained in the FISA applications" (to conduct surveillance on Trump-campaign
helper Carter Page). They contained "inaccurate information," i.e. the applications were fraudulent. Christopher
Steele, the author of the infamous Steele Dossier, a pastiche of defamatory fabrications that was paid for by the Clinton
campaign and was the principal basis of the FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) applications, thought he was
answerable to paying clients (the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee, through a law firm and the
dirty-tricks operation Fusion GPS), while the FBI thought he was answerable to the Bureau, despite having closed out Steele
for cause for assisting Fusion GPS in getting his false allegations into the media. Yet he continued to feed
information to the FBI through the wife of senior Justice Department official Bruce Ohr; she was contracted to Fusion GPS.
Steele met 13 times with Mrs. Ohr after Steele's termination by the FBI, and his information was fed to the FBI.
Steele continued to supply information to the FBI that director James Comey and deputy director Andrew McCabe wanted to
include in the Intelligence Community Assessment of these matters (at least that outrage was not approved, but their effort
incites intense curiosity about Horowitz's imputation of motives). "Ohr committed consequential errors in judgment" and
a (prolonged) "lapse of judgment," Horowitz writes.
Obama Wanted To
Know Everything His Trump Spies Were Doing, And It Looks Like He Did. When it comes to the unlawful
surveillance on Donald Trump's presidential campaign, the most important question is, what did President Obama know and when
did he know it? If we are to believe the testimony in the Justice Department inspector general's report on FISA abuse,
Obama didn't know anything about the Crossfire Hurricane investigation. Neither did his attorney general, her deputy,
or anyone in the White House. At least not that they can recall — an expression used over 200 times
in the report. Yet against this we have the Sept. 2, 2016, text message from Lisa Page to her paramour Peter Strzok
saying "POTUS wants to know everything we are doing." True to form, the IG report goes to great lengths to argue that
"knowing everything" in fact meant knowing nothing at all.
WaPo
Admits: Republicans' Famous Memo On FISA Abuse Blasted By Dems Ended Up Getting It Mostly Right. Now that
Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz has finally released his much-anticipated report on alleged misconduct
by the FBI during the 2016 election, two famous memos — one released by Republican Rep. Devin Nunes while he
was House Intelligence Committee chairman, and Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff, who has since taken over the
position — have come under renewed scrutiny. The memos presented dueling versions of how the FBI began to
surveil Trump campaign adviser Carter Page in an effort to investigate alleged "collusion" with Russia. So who had it
right? A fact-checker for The Washington Post has been forced to admit that Nunes got a "fair amount" right —
in fact, his version of events aligned far more closely with what Horowitz found than the Democrats' rebuttal.
IG
report shows Russia hoax [is/was] a coup attempt. Inspector General Michael Horowitz finally damned the FBI
during his testimony Wednesday when he said he would be "skeptical" that there was anything accidental in the egregious
catalog of errors the bureau committed in its spying operation on Donald Trump's presidential campaign. It took five
hours of questioning about the FBI's motivations, but Horowitz, prudent and impartial as he is, finally delivered the money
shot. Asked by Republican Sen. Mike Crapo if the 17 "significant errors or omissions" he found in the FBI's
surveillance operation could possibly be "accidental," Horowitz said: "I would be skeptical."
This
Isn't The First Time The IG Denied Flagrant Bias At The FBI. The IG said that he couldn't state definitively
that political bias motivated officials at the FBI to launch and then sustain an investigation against the Trump campaign
based on the Clinton-campaign funded and thoroughly discredited Steele Dossier. [...] First, what the IG report actually said
was that it couldn't find "documentary or testimonial evidence" that anti-Trump animus got the investigation going in the
first place, saying it was "a discretionary judgment call left to the FBI." Basically, then, the IG is saying there was
no memo saying flat out that Trump-hating FBI officials were taking on this investigation to sabotage the Trump candidacy and
presidency, and no one would openly admit bias to the IG's investigators. However, even the claim that the investigation's
launch was legitimate and free of bias is itself being challenged by U.S. Attorney John Durham.

Matt
Gaetz nailed Dem impeachment counsel Daniel Goldman. [Scroll down] Then, Gaetz moved in for the kill,
asking him, "Have you ever tweeted anything at the president?" "I have made a number of tweets in my private capacity
before I came to this job when I worked in the media," Goldman replied. "As a matter of fact, this is one of those
tweets," Gaetz said gleefully displaying the posterboard. [Photo] "You said, 'Nothing in the dossier has proved
to be false.' But in fact, the dossier said there was a Russian consulate in Miami, when there isn't. The dossier
said Michael Cohen had a meeting in Prague, when he didn't. The dossier said Michael Cohen's wife was Russian, she is in
fact Ukrainian," Gaetz said. "So we sit here today and you've got a tweet mentioning a 'pee tape' while claiming to be
non-partisan. Hired by the Democrats to pursue the president. Do you regret this tweet?"
Graham
alleges 'massive criminal conspiracy' in FBI's Russia probe in blistering hearing statement. Republican
Sen. Lindsey Graham accused the FBI officials who investigated the Trump campaign's ties to Russia of a "massive
criminal conspiracy" in a fiery opening statement Wednesday for a hearing where the Justice Department's top watchdog
testified. In a freewheeling speech to kick off the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on FBI abuses, the committee
chairman said federal investigators made more than a few missteps — and took the law into their own hands.
"What has been described as a few irregularities becomes a massive criminal conspiracy over time to defraud the FISA court,
to illegally surveil an American citizen and keep an operation open against a sitting president of the United
States — violating every norm known to the rule of law," Graham said.
IG
Horowitz hearing exposes deliberate FBI misconduct in investigating Trump campaign. When the FBI discovered
that the anti-Trump Steele dossier was garbage, the bureau concealed that vital evidence. Instead of promptly
terminating its surveillance of Donald Trump's former campaign adviser Carter Page, the FBI persisted in its quest to prove a
Trump-Russia "collusion" conspiracy that officials knew was unsupported by credible evidence. This was the most
significant result of Wednesday's Senate Judiciary Committee questioning of Michael Horowitz, the inspector general (IG) at
the Department of Justice, in the aftermath of his damning 476-page report on the FBI investigation of the Trump campaign
that was released this week.
Lindsey
Graham rips into media coverage of IG report: 'How do you get a headline like that?'. Republican
Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, railed against the media's takeaways
from Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz's recently released Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)
report. In a freewheeling speech Wednesday to kick off the committee's hearing on FBI abuses, Graham said that
Crossfire Hurricane — a covert counterintelligence investigation by the FBI into suspected coordination between
President Trump's 2016 campaign and the Russian government's meddling in the election — was "probably the best
name ever given to an investigation in the history of investigations" because, he exclaimed, "that's what we wound up with: a
crossfire and a hurricane."
Rep. Devin
Nunes on Horowitz FISA abuse report: 'I felt more than vindicated'. House Intelligence Committee Ranking Member
Devin Nunes, R-Calif., said Wednesday that he felt "more than vindicated" after the release of Justice Department Inspector
General Michael Horowitz's report Monday and its findings regarding the Russia investigation. "I think I felt more than
vindicated because actually I give Horowitz a lot of credit because they were actually able to find things that we didn't
know," Nunes said on on "Tucker Carlson Tonight." "Like we didn't know that they had actually found, talked to [Christopher]
Steele's Russian sources. And I think that's a critical key here because now you have to bring into question everything
that happened with [former Special Counsel Robert] Mueller."
Sen.
Hawley: The 'Collusion Was Between the DNC and the FBI'. While questioning Inspector General Michael
Horowitz on Wednesday about the FBI's malfeasance in its spying on the 2016 Trump campaign, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.)
said there was "collusion" in that presidential election, not with Russia but between the FBI and the Democratic National
Committee (DNC). The report by Horowitz confirmed that the DNC paid for the salacious "dossier," compiled by ex-British
spy Christopher Steele, that supposedly showed Trump had been compromised by the Russians. The dossier was not factual
and had been dismissed by the CIA as "internet rumor."
The
Truth about the Horowitz Report. [Scroll down] The key to the IG report was not whether it explicitly
said there was or wasn't reason to open the four investigations. The really important part was the 17 significant
errors or omissions in the Carter Page FISA applications and the many additional errors contained in the Woods Procedures (a
procedure requiring the vetting of every fact submitted to a FISA court for permission to spy on an American.) The IG report
found that many significant facts were withheld from the court and others were altered. It is a damning assessment of
the veracity of the FBI and the fundamental basis of the entire investigation. It is also a felony crime. Of the
17 major errors found in the Page FISA application information, all the errors favored Hillary Clinton and the Clinton
campaign. This is incalculably beyond coincidence. It is facial political bias. The many errors and
omissions were never satisfactorily explained to the Office of Investigations. The report stated that it appeared
agents were substituting their own judgements in place of the OI judgements. If this isn't investigatory bias,
what is?
Misfired
'Hurricane': Comey's team abused Carter Page and the FBI. The report by IG Michael Horowitz is one long expose
of a confluence of actors at the top of the FBI who, by their own words, despised Donald Trump and came together to open and
run an investigation into his 2016 presidential campaign, falsifying documents, withholding evidence and using a confidential
source who had stated clearly that his goal was to prevent a Trump presidency. Despite these flashing lights, the IG
essentially stated that since no one admitted to being motivated by their personal biases, he could not reach that
conclusion. Thanks for that, but most Americans unencumbered by a law degree can detect the obvious without a lot of
effort. Ironically, the devastating decisions and abuses that the report goes on to enumerate are only explained with
any kind of logic by the swift current of personal animus gripping the main protagonists then at the top of the FBI.
'Aghast'
to learn how little the Obama-era AG was involved in FBI Trump probe: fmr independent counsel. Former
Whitewater Independent Counsel Robert Ray said he was "aghast to learn how little involved the [Obama administration]
attorney general and the deputy attorney general of the United States" were in the FBI investigation into President Donald
Trump's 2016 presidential campaign. Ray said that is the most stunning revelation from the Justice Department Inspector
General's review of FBI conduct at the height of the 2016 presidential campaign. "I think Michael Horowitz was surprised
to learn," said Ray on Fox Nation's "Deep Dive" on Tuesday [12/10/2019], "and I cannot believe that there is an investigation
that would take you inside a presidential campaign and four people who were targeted within that campaign and that doesn't
require some kind of supervisory review and initiation beyond simply the inner-reaches of the FBI."
Democrat
Smears on Nunes's FISA Abuse Memo Proved False by Inspector General Report. Democrats last year smeared
Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) when he issued a memo with findings that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) abused the
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act process when it obtained surveillance warrants on Carter Page, a member of the Trump
campaign, in 2016. However, a report released Monday by Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz [...]
vindicated Nunes's memo and proved Democrats' smears and assertions were false. Nunes's memo included the findings that
1) "material and relevant information was omitted" in applications for FISA warrants; 2) the FBI inaccurately stated in their
FISA warrant applications that ex-British spy Christopher Steele was not a source for a Yahoo News report used in the applications;
3) Steele maintained contact with the FBI even after being fired as a source; 4) the FBI did not corroborate the Steele
dossier at the time it was included in the applications; and 5) the FISA applications for Page mentioned former campaign aide
George Papadopoulos, even though there was no conspiracy between Page and Papadopoulos. The DOJ IG's report confirmed every
finding in Nunes's memo.
Bruce
Swartz, Textbook Swamp Dweller. The Inspector General's Report from the Department of Justice (DOJ) features a
heretofore unheralded costar by the name of Bruce Swartz, the assistant attorney general in the Criminal Division.
Swartz was also the supervisor of the feckless Bruce Ohr, husband of Fusion GPS contractor Nellie Ohr and frequent breakfast
buddy of Christopher Steele of Steele dossier fame. Unreported by Inspector General Michael Horowitz, however, was
Swartz's starring role in another DoJ drama some 15 years earlier. Given the scant media attention the case received
in 2004-2005, it is possible Horowitz did not even know about Swartz's yeoman effort to save Clinton National Security Advisor
Sandy Berger from a lengthy sojourn in a federal Supermax.
Horowitz
Goes Full Comey. Like disgraced former FBI director James Comey before him exonerating Hillary Clinton for her
crimes, DOJ inspector general Michael Horowitz presents us with a documented list of crimes, fraud, and deception in the
FISA warrant application process by the FBI but then says never mind — these are bureaucratic mistakes made
without bias and without intent. There still was sufficient predicate, says he, for starting an investigation and
surveillance of Team Trump, even as Horowitz admits that the first FISA warrant, the one authorizing surveilling Carter
Page, was riddled with errors and omissions of key exculpatory evidence. It was the first of four frauds committed on
the FISA court, a felony.
Kimberley
Strassel lays out 'key findings' in IG report: A 'triumph' for Nunes, an 'excoriation' of Schiff. The
Wall Street Journal's Kimberley Strassel believes Rep. Adam Schiff owes the country an "enormous apology." She
spoke to "Fox & Friends" hosts about the release of the anticipated Justice Department inspector general report, noting that
the contents spell "triumph" for Rep. Devin Nunes and trouble for his Democrat colleague, Schiff.
Ray was 'Aghast'
to learn extent of Obama AG's involvement in FBI Trump probe: Fmr independent counsel. Former Whitewater
Independent Counsel Robert Ray said he was "aghast to learn how little involved the [Obama administration] attorney general
and the deputy attorney general of the United States" were in the FBI investigation into President Donald Trump's 2016
presidential campaign. Ray said that is the most stunning revelation from the Justice Department Inspector General's
review of FBI conduct at the height of the 2016 presidential campaign. "I think Michael Horowitz was surprised to
learn," said Ray on Fox Nation's "Deep Dive" on Tuesday, "and I cannot believe that there is an investigation that would take
you inside a presidential campaign and four people who were targeted within that campaign and that doesn't require some kind
of supervisory review and initiation beyond simply the inner-reaches of the FBI."
IG
Report Confirms Schiff FISA Memo Media Praised Was Riddled With Lies. The memo from the Republicans on the
House Intelligence Committee reported:
[#1] A salacious and unverified dossier formed an essential part of
the application to secure a warrant against a Trump campaign affiliate named Carter Page. This application failed to
reveal that the dossier was bought and paid for by Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee.
[#2]
The application cited a Yahoo News article extensively. The story did not corroborate the dossier, and the FBI
wrongly claimed Christopher Steele, the author of the dossier, was not a source for the story.
[#3] Nellie
Ohr, the wife of a high-ranking Justice Department official, also worked on behalf of the Clinton campaign effort. Her
husband Bruce Ohr funneled her research into the Department of Justice. Although he admitted that Steele "was desperate
that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being president," this and the Ohrs' relationship with the
Clinton campaign was concealed from the secret court that grants surveillance warrants. [...]
All of these things were
found to be true by the Inspector General Michael Horowitz in his December 9 report. In fact, Horowitz detailed rampant
abuse that went far beyond these four items.
Attorney
General William Barr says FBI may have acted in 'bad faith'. Questions about the FBI's motives in targeting
President Trump's 2016 campaign are mounting despite a Justice Department inspector general report that could not pin down
evidence of bias. Attorney General William Barr on Tuesday [12/10/2019] said Justice Department Inspector General
Michael E. Horowitz did not push hard enough for answers to why the FBI made a slew of embarrassing errors, omissions and
inaccuracies in its Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) application to wiretap Trump campaign aide Carter
Page. If not a get-Trump mentality at the FBI, he asked, then what was it?
Horowitz
offers soundbites to Dems, facts to Republicans. It would be a great understatement to say that Michael
Horowitz, the Department of Justice Inspector General, doesn't leap to conclusions. In fact, he does everything
possible to ignore reasonable conclusions from the evidence he found and emphasizes the evidence that he didn't find
justifying his lack of a conclusion. His latest report on the handling of the FISA warrants used to spy in the Trump
campaign states: ["]...we did not conclude that the decision [to pursue an investigation of the Trump campaign]
was based on improper considerations in the absence of documentary or testimonial evidence to the contrary.["]
In other words, because nobody outright testified or wrote that they were launching Crossfire Hurricane out of hatred for
President Trump, Horowitz will not draw that conclusion, even with all the Trump hatred evident in the text messages between
Peter Strzok and Lisa Page.
Just
how bad was the FBI's Russia FISA? 51 violations and 9 false statements. To understand just how shoddy the
FBI's work was in securing a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant targeting the Trump campaign, you only need to
read an obscure attachment to Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz's report. Appendix 1 identifies the
total violations by the FBI of the so-called Woods Procedures, the process by which the bureau verifies information and
assures the FISA court its evidence is true. The Appendix identifies a total of 51 Woods procedure violations from the
FISA application the FBI submitted to the court authorizing surveillance of former Trump campaign aide Carter Page starting
in October 2016. A whopping nine of those violations fell into the category called: "Supporting document shows
that the factual assertion is inaccurate."
Nation's
Top Cop Punches Coup Attempt Against POTUS Trump In The Face With Scathing Rebuke. It's a quick uppercut to the
jaw of the Deep State delivered via Attorney General William Barr in the form of a brutally powerful statement following
today's release of the IG report. AG Barr makes clear he has the Deep State in his sights and he appears fully prepared
to take this to the finish line.
Horowitz
report is [bad] for the FBI and unsettling for the rest of us. The analysis of the report by Justice
Department inspector general Michael Horowitz greatly depends, as is often the case, on which cable news channel you
watch. Indeed, many people might be excused for concluding that Horowitz spent 476 pages to primarily conclude one
thing, which is that the Justice Department acted within its guidelines in starting its investigation into the 2016 campaign
of President Trump. Horowitz did say that the original decision to investigate was within the discretionary standard of
the Justice Department. That standard for the predication of an investigation is low, simply requiring "articulable
facts." He said that, since this is a low discretionary standard, he cannot say it was inappropriate to start. United
States Attorney John Durham, who is heading the parallel investigation at the Justice Department, took the usual step of
issuing a statement that he did not believe the evidence supported that conclusion at the beginning of the investigation.
IG
report lays out compelling evidence FBI misled FISA court in Russia case, sources say. The Justice Department
inspector general's report into the Russia collusion investigation lays out incontrovertible evidence that the FBI misled the
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court through false information and omissions, according to sources familiar with its
findings. The evidence that the judges were misled is so sweeping that it could provide grounds, if Attorney General
William Barr chooses, to withdraw the FBI's application for the surveillance warrants that began in October 2016 to target
ex-Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, the sources added. Such a move, while mostly legally symbolic since the probe is
long since closed, would still amount to a resounding rebuke to an FBI probe that the bureau, Democrats and their media
allies relentlessly defended.
DOJ
inspector general finds 17 'significant errors or omissions' in Carter Page FISA applications. The Justice
Department watchdog excoriated the FBI for relying upon British ex-spy Christopher Steele's dossier in obtaining Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Act warrants to monitor onetime Trump campaign adviser Carter Page. Inspector General Michael
Horowitz, who released a report on Monday showing his findings regarding allegations of surveillance abuses, also found the
FISA process was significantly flawed and marred by serious mistakes and missteps, but determined that the initiation of the
Trump-Russia investigation itself crossed the low threshold to be properly predicated and was not influenced by political
bias as some of President Trump's allies have alleged.
DOJ
IG: 'At Least 17 Significant Errors or Omissions in the Carter Page FISA' Application. The U.S. Department of
Justice's (DOJ) audit on the origins of the Russiam collision hoax released Monday by the inspector general (IG) found "at
least 17 significant errors and omissions" in the Carter Page federal surveillance application that enabled the investigation
into the Donald Trump's presidential campaign in 2016. DOJ IG Michael Horowitz's report indicated the agents in charge
of dealing with approving FISA surveillance, particularly the Carter Page one approved by FBI Director James Comey, "did not
give appropriate attention or treatment to the facts that cut against probable cause, or reassess the information supporting
probable cause as the investigation progressed."
IG
Report Proves Democrats Were Wrong, and Nunes Right, About FISA Warrant. The Department of Justice (DOJ)
Inspector General (IG)'s report Monday on the FBI's use of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants found that
the agency misled the FISA court, though not due to political bias. It also found that the decision to initiate an
investigation into Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign was adequately founded — although Attorney General
William Barr and U.S. Attorney John Durham disagree.
The
Reason for Conflict Between Horowitz and Durham is Crystal Clear on Page 2. What inspector general Horowitz
outlines in that key section is that: (A) he has reviewed everything, and talked to everyone (current and former) within the
FBI; and (B) the ONLY evidence they FBI cited for the opening of Crossfire Hurricane is the singular conversation between
George Papadopoulos and Australian Ambassador Alexander Downer and/or Downer's asst. Erika Thompson. That's it.
Nothing else. There is no other predicate evidence from the FBI investigative unit other than a singular conversation
between Alexander Downer/Erika Thompson and George Papadopoulos.
All eyes
on Durham after rebuke of IG Horowitz's findings. In the hours after U.S. Attorney John Durham announced Monday
that he did not "agree" with key findings by Justice Department Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz, speculation swirled
over what Durham has uncovered in his ongoing review into potential surveillance abuses against President Trump's team.
Durham's inquiry has had a broader scope than Horowitz's, including a focus on foreign actors as well as the CIA, while
Horowitz concentrated his attention on the DOJ and FBI. Additionally, Durham's criminal review has had additional
investigative resources not available to Horowitz.
Ted Cruz:
Horowitz report shows FBI was 'utterly negligent' at best, 'complicit' in abuse of power at worst. Senate
Judiciary Committee member Ted Cruz, R-Texas, called the Justice Department inspector general's report both "chilling and
encouraging" in an interview Monday [12/9/2019] on "Hannity." "It is stunning the abuse of power that we saw in the Obama
administration and sadly it continued over in the deep state for the first couple of years of the Trump administration," Cruz
told host Sean Hannity, [...] "The very best interpretation of the Horowitz inspector general report is that the FBI and
Department of Justice were manifestly incompetent," he said. "The IG report outlines 17 factual misstatements that they
made to the FISA [Foreign Intelligence Surveiilance {sic}] court and that they were utterly negligent in ordering the surveillance
[and] spying of a presidential nominee and of a sitting president."
Justice
Dep't watchdog finds 2016 launch of FBI probe of Trump advisers was legitimate - source. The U.S. Justice
Department's internal watchdog said it found numerous errors but no evidence of political bias by the FBI when it opened an
investigation into contacts between Donald Trump's presidential campaign and Russia in 2016. The report by Inspector
General Michael Horowitz was likely to give ammunition to both Trump's supporters and his Democratic critics in the ongoing
debate about the legitimacy of an investigation that shadowed the first two years of his presidency. Horowitz found
that the FBI had a legal "authorized purpose" to ask for court approval to begin surveillance of Carter Page, a Trump
campaign adviser. But Horowitz also found a total of 17 "basic and fundamental" errors and omissions in the original
application and all subsequent renewals to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA). Those errors made the
case appear stronger than it was, Horowitz said.
FISA report drops:
7 takeaways from DOJ watchdog's Russia probe review. The report said investigators found no intentional
misconduct or political bias surrounding either the launch of the Trump-Russia investigation or as efforts to seek the
controversial FISA warrant to monitor former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page in the early stages of that probe. "We
did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation influenced the FBI's decision to
seek FISA authority on Carter Page," the report said. It also said key officials, including former FBI Director James
Comey and former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, did not act with political bias.
IG
report proves whole investigation was as corrupt as Comey. It's now official: Russia, Russia, Russia
really was fake news from the start. There was no factual basis for the FBI to spy on Donald Trump's campaign.
That means there was no need for the appointment of a special counsel and that Robert Mueller should have stayed in
retirement. It means the two years of rumors and accusations and the giant cloud of suspicions over the White House
produced by Mueller's headhunters were unfair and unjustified. It also means J. Edgar Hoover can finally rest in
peace. James Comey is now revealed to be the dirtiest cop ever to run the FBI.
AG
Bill Barr Just Issued a Translation of the DOJ IG Report. Because the IG has no right to subpoena and can't
lock anyone up, he can only refer people for prosecution. Currently, most of the people who conducted the abuse have
been fired and were out of the purview of the IG. The IG report, however, found that officials lied and omitted
helpful information to Trump campaign officials who were being spied on, but couldn't determine if the malfeasance was
politically motivated. U.S. Attorney John Durham is looking into why the Trump spying case was hatched by people
clearly pulling for Hillary Clinton to win the election.
Brennan
Lied About Not Including Steele Dossier In Intelligence Community Assessment On 2016 Russian Election Interference.
The new report from Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz confirmed former CIA Director John Brennan lied to
Congress about whether the dossier authored by Christopher Steele was used in the Obama administration's Intelligence Community
Assessment (ICA). The ICA, a report conducted by intelligence officials in 2016 on Russian election interference, was used
to brief President Barack Obama and President-elect Donald Trump in January 2017. According to the IG report, there was
significant discussion by top intelligence officials as to whether the unverified Steele dossier should be included in the main
body of the ICA report, summarized in an appendix, or even included at all.
DOJ Watchdog Puts Final
Nail In Steele Dossier's Coffin. A Justice Department watchdog's report released Monday [12/9/2019]
definitively debunked one of the Steele dossier's most pervasive allegations of collusion, while severely undermining other
hair-raising claims about Donald Trump and former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page. The report is unsparing of both
Christopher Steele, the dossier author, and the FBI's handling of the salacious document. It paints a picture of
Steele, a former British spy, as an eager gun-for-hire encumbered with a poor sense of judgment. The FBI, while
absolved of a top-down, politically-motivated conspiracy to take down Trump, failed to verify any of Steele's allegations,
and also omitted key pieces of information that contradicted the dossier.
More about
the Fusion GPS Dossier.
13
Things To Look For In The Inspector General FISA Abuse Report. [#1] Concerns about Federal Surveillance of
Carter Page: Before looking at a list of concerns Horowitz's forthcoming report should address, here are the basics
concerning the Page FISA warrants. According to the response memo Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) released to counter
Nunes' memo, the "DOJ first applied to the [FISA court] on October 21, 2016 for a warrant to permit the FBI to initiate
electronic surveillance and physical search of Page for 90 days, ... The Court approved three renewals — in
early January 2017, early April 2017, and late June 2017 — which authorized the FBI to maintain surveillance on Page
until late September 2017." We also know from "Nunes' HPSCI memo that former FBI director James Comey certified three
of the FISA applications and former deputy director Andrew McCabe certified the fourth, while former deputy attorney general
Sally Yates approved the initial October 21, 2016, application and the January 2017 renewal, and then-Acting Deputy Attorney
General Dana Boente and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein signed the June 2017 and September 2017 renewals."
U.S.
Attorney John Durham Does Not Agree With IG Horowitz Conclusions. U.S. Attorney John Durham is currently doing
a criminal investigation into how the intelligence community, CIA, ODNI and DOJ/FBI originated the investigation of candidate
Donald Trump. U.S. Attorney Durham does not agree with the conclusions presented by Inspector General Horowitz.
US
Attorney John Durham Releases Statement Disputing IG Report Conclusions. The DOJ Inspector General Michael
Horowitz finally released his report on FISA abuses on Monday [12/9/2019]. The report revealed what we knew to be true
all along — the FBI defrauded the FISA court and purposely omitted exculpatory information from the FISA judges in
order to obtain FOUR FISA warrants on Trump campaign advisor Carter Page. Horowitz, however concluded that the FBI
investigation into Trump was not politically motivated — and John Durham hit back.
Inspector
General Report on DOJ and FBI Compliance With FISA Legal Requirements. First, with a volume of text over 600
pages, and potentially as high as 1,000 pages, there is no immediate analysis you will find in the media today based on a
review of the report. [...] It is strongly suggested you read the report for yourself, draw your own conclusions, and don't
rely on what could be sections taken out of context. Obviously crowdsourcing the report is one of the fastest ways to
absorb information in a discussion thread. Secondly, keep in mind while the IG review began in March 2018 the Mueller
investigation almost certainly kept many aspects of the material shielded from IG inquiry until the special counsel
investigation ended. Indeed as we have seen from other material delayed throughout 2018, up to March 2019 when the
Mueller probe ended, many documents were hidden (likely intentionally) by the special counsel. So a full unimpeded IG
review likely did not begin until after the Mueller investigation concluded. Hence, some delays.
Report:
AG Barr Disagrees with IG on Whether Trump Surveillance Justified. Attorney General William Barr reportedly
disagrees with a finding by the forthcoming Department of Justice (DOJ) Inspector General (IG) report that the FBI had
sufficient reason to monitor the Trump campaign in 2016. The FBI conducted surveillance on Trump campaign associates,
including foreign policy aide Carter Page, on the basis of suspicions that the campaign might have been colluding with Russia
to interfere with the 2016 election. No evidence of collusion was ever found, though the surveillance continued well
after the election, and the fact that the FBI was investigating the Trump campaign over Russia was leaked to Democrats and to
the mainstream media.
The
10 most important revelations to expect from the Russia probe FISA report. Next week Americans will finally get
their most complete accounting to date of what the FBI did right and wrong in the Russia collusion investigation that probed
President Trump's campaign with a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant at the end of the 2016 election.
Predicted to span more than 500 pages and 100 witness interviews, Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz's
report Monday will provide a comprehensive catalog of what offenses, mistakes and oversights the FBI committed during one of
the most politically polarizing investigations in recent history. As such, it will serve as a non-partisan roadmap for
a much longer process of holding the investigators to account, a process that now includes a criminal probe being led by U.S.
Attorney John Durham and investigative hearings by Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Lindsey Graham.
Fusion
GPS Chiefs Spin Hard Before the Horowitz Report. There are a few bombshells tucked in the new book authored by
Glenn Simpson and Peter Fritsch, co-owners of Fusion GPS, the opposition research firm responsible for the most infamous
dossier in American political history. Here's one that — as far as I know — hasn't been disclosed
until now: Before Fusion hired Christopher Steele in 2016 to produce his sketchy dossier on Donald Trump's presidential
campaign, Steele hired Fusion to help him with a client at odds with a key figure in the Trump camp. The London-based
operative, misleadingly portrayed in the press as a mere former British intelligence officer, needed help investigating the
Trump advisor for his client. The campaign advisor? Paul Manafort. Steele's client? Vladimir
Putin-tied oligarch Oleg Deripaska.
Gen.
Flynn's lawyer says Inspector General report will have everything. While Washington waits for the release of
the Inspector General's report, some leaks are making their way around town. One America's Jack Posobiec spoke with
Sidney Powell, General Michael Flynn's attorney, to learn how it may affect his case. [Video clip]
AG
Bill Barr Disputes IG Horowitz's Findings On the Trump-Russia Investigation. Attorney General Bill Barr is
pushing back on IG Horowitz's coming findings on the Trump-Russia investigation. Recent reports have said that Horowitz
will find no political bias in the investigation despite ample evidence numerous high level officials had it out for
Trump. As with the IG's findings on the Hillary investigation, Horowitz's standard is apparently an admission under
oath and sealed in blood, as he found dozens of pieces of evidence of bias there but still concluded there was nothing
conclusive. Now, The Washington Post is saying Barr doesn't agree with his coming characterizations.
Whitewash?
IG Report on FISA Abuses by Obama Administration Will Disappoint the Right. Multiple media outlets are
reporting that Justice Department Inspector General David Horowitz's report on abuses by Obama-era officials in obtaining
FISA warrants to spy on the Trump campaign will almost certainly disappoint those who believe that political bias colored the
FBI's investigation. The IG report is due out December 9, but already it appears that there will be no recommendations
for indictments of major officials who were in charge of the investigation. [...] The FBI says the dossier did not play a
significant role in acquiring the warrant to spy on Carter Page. But their communications say otherwise. Horowitz
is apparently playing the old Washington game of misdirection. He will solemnly criticize the FBI for errors and
carelessness in the warrant application while ignoring the bias and unprofessional attitude of FBI officials from top to
bottom that contributed to getting the warrant in the first place.
Why
DOJ Inspector General Horowitz Had to Produce Two Reports. On Tuesday, Nov. 19, the Department of Justice
Office of the Inspector General released a new report. No, not that one. It was not the FISA abuse report, also
dubbed "The Spygate Report," that has been anticipated for more than a year. This was a different report that involved
serious issues with the FBI's uses of what are called "Confidential Human Sources" (CHS) or "informants".
News and timely commentary about the Inspector General's report, released April 13, 2018:
Scandals
Sanitized with Linguistic Trickery. Throughout Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz's massive
report on the Hillary Clinton email investigation are lots of strange things. One of the weirdest is the extent to
which the FBI went to make up words and phrases to disguise reality. An early draft of the 2016 FBI report on the email
scandal was reportedly subjected to linguistic surgery to exonerate the former secretary of state, who at the time was the
Democratic nominee for president. Clinton was originally found to be "grossly negligent" in using an illegal email
server. That legalistic phrase is used by prosecutors to indict for violation of laws governing the wrongful transmission
of confidential government documents. Yet the very thought of a likely President Clinton in court so worried the chief
investigator, FBI Director James Comey, that he watered down "grossly negligent" to the mere "extremely careless."
Horowitz:
Over 300 Bribes To FBI Agents By Journalists; Two FBI Agents Who Hated Trump Still Work For Mueller; And More.
Yesterday, the Department of Justice IG Michael Horowitz testified before Chuck Grassley's Senate Judiciary Committee.
A few interesting points came out of that. First, we know that James Comey is the subject of an investigation into his
leaking of classified information. We know that there is a grand jury sitting for some reason because the materials in
the IG report were reviewed for grand jury testimony. [...] Today [6/19/2018], he's in front of Trey Gowdy's Government
Accountability Committee and some really good stuff is coming out. The IG is examining Strzok's role in moving the
Russia probe forward. Prediction: nothing comes of this because the damage it would do to the FBI and to Justice was
would be astronomical if it were shown that the investigation was launched from political motives. And the issue of the
Deep State would begin to look a lot more Third world than we'd like to think.
FBI
may have modified witness reports, misled DOJ watchdog with 'false information,' GOP Rep says. The FBI may have
"edited and changed" key witness reports in the Hillary Clinton and Russia investigations, a top House Republican charged in
a hearing into FBI and Justice Department misconduct Tuesday [6/19/2018]. Freedom Caucus Chair Rep. Mark Meadows,
R-N.C, also raised the possibility that the FBI misled the DOJ watchdog in an attempt to hide the identities of FBI employees
who were caught sending anti-Trump messages.
New
Developments On Inspector General's Report Of Comey's FBI. On Wednesday [5/9/2018], CNN law enforcement analyst and retired FBI
supervisory special agent James A. Gagliano revealed new insight into the Justice Department's Inspector General report that is expected
to be released in the near future, saying it is even worse than expected, according to his sources. Gagliano tweeted: "Sources
with knowledge of the impending DOJ Inspector General Report confirm that it will be a fairly damning indictment of FBI's seventh floor
during the Comey era. 'It's worse than expected,' seems to be the consistent theme ..."
IG
Report Proves Andrew McCabe's Firing Was Justified. Ever since former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe was
fired, McCabe and his Democrat supporters have maintained it was politically motivated. On Friday, Justice Department
Inspector General Michael Horowitz, a holdover from the Obama administration, released a long-awaited report that proves
beyond doubt McCabe was fired for cause. [...] With respect to lack of candor, the report listed four instances on
pages 4-5 and again with more detail on pages 15-21 with dates, times, and McCabe's own testimony, both
under oath and not.
IG Report Shows Andrew McCabe Is A Criminal —
So When Is He Going To Jail? The initial Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report on former FBI assistant
director Andrew McCabe hasn't gotten much attention since it was released on Friday, despite the fact that it is
shocking. So shocking in fact, that when it was first leaked to the higher echelons of our government, it forced
current FBI Director Christopher Wray to immediately relieve McCabe of duty and it eventually led to McCabe's firing without
his government golden parachute.
Loretta
Lynch Threatened To Reopen Eric Garner Case If NYPD Leaked Info About Weiner's Laptop. Journalist Tracy Beanz
uncovered an explosive detail about former Attorney General Loretta Lynch buried deep in the report from the Department of
Justice's Office of Inspector General that was released last week. [...] When the NYPD seized [Anthony] Weiner's personal
laptop as part of the investigation, they found hundreds of emails from former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
Weiner's wife at the time, Huma Abedin, has worked for Clinton for more than a decade. So Abedin and Clinton's work
emails from the State Department, which contained classified information, were on Weiner's computer. That computer was
in the NYPD's possession. All of this was discovered and announced in late October 2016, which was just prior to the
presidential election. In an attempt to perhaps shield Clinton from more public scrutiny, the OIG report appears to
show that Lynch threatened to reopen the Garner case — which involved the NYPD fatally shooting an African
American — if officers leaked damaging information about Clinton's emails on Weiner's laptop.
Inspector
General Bombshell: Why Obama AG Loretta Lynch May Be in Legal Jeopardy. Hidden within the OIG report on
McCabe's leak to Barrett of the WSJ, is an astronomically damning correlation between Loretta Lynch, the NY Field Office of
the FBI, McCabe, and the NYPD. On September 28, 2016, McCabe is made aware of the information they found regarding
Hillary Clinton on Anthony Weiners laptop in an unrelated "sexting" case they are investigating.
Trail
of James Comeys Dirt on Loretta Lynch Discovered within IG Report on Andrew McCabe. A very interesting
development is unfolding as a result of internet researcher TracyBeanz and some insightful dot connecting by those
following. The outline begins via a relatively under-reported accusation about former Attorney General Loretta Lynch by
former FBI Director James Comey in his upcoming book. According to ABC News Comey writes in "A Higher Loyalty:
Truth, Lies and Leadership," that he became the public face of the investigation partly because of a mysterious development
which he felt could cast "serious doubt" on Lynch's independence. It seems rather odd for James Comey to be making such
an accusation against Loretta Lynch in the book. Why add that aspect? [A]nd why do so without expanding the details?
10
Key Insights From Today's Deep State Coup News. [#10] Lisa Page, the DOJ special counsel for the FBI during
Obamagate, is a cooperating witness with Inspector General Horowitz. Her testimony — and text messages —
are laced throughout today's [4/13/2018] IG report on Andrew McCabe's lies that led to his firing. Page's evidence is very
likely instrumental to the more complete IG report due out in May. [#9] When The Wall Street Journal's Devlin
Barrett reported on Andrew McCabe's conflict of interest with respect to the Hillary Clinton email investigation, the then-deputy
director had a panic attack. Barrett reported that the state senate campaign of McCabe's wife was funded to the tune of more
than half-a-million by Clinton proxy Terry McCauliffe. In fact, just days after revelations that Clinton operated an illegal
email server for all State Department business became public, McCaullife visited Jill McCabe and encouraged her to run for
office. Her husband Andrew would, under normal circumstances, have led any investigation into Hillary's illegal actions.
Bombshell
in McCabe IG Report No One Is Talking About. The Department of Justice Inspector General report on Andrew
McCabe is centered around the leaks and lies of Andrew McCabe. Ignored in all of this was the reason he leaked.
And it's a bombshell. He said a top Obama appointee, the Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General (PADAG), ordered him
to "stand down" in the Clinton Foundation investigation. There were witnesses. No one is talking about that.
How The Obama
Justice Department Tried To Shut Down The FBI's Investigation Into The Clinton Foundation. The Department of
Justice Inspector General report on the "lack of candor" by FBI deputy Director Andrew McCabe also documents for the first
time the Obama administration's effort to shut down the bureau's investigation of the Clinton Foundation, according to a
review of the report by The Daily Caller News Foundation Investigative Group. The inspector general (IG) confirmed in
its long-awaited report released Friday that in 2016 the FBI had ongoing field investigations of the Clinton Foundation in
New York, Los Angeles, Little Rock, Arkansas and Washington, D.C. The multi-city investigation was launched when agents
found "suspicious activity" between a foreign donor and Clinton Foundation activity in the Los Angeles area, as TheDCNF
reported in August 2016.
Editor's note: This excerpt is presented here
in its original form — Twitter-ese:
So far I'm floored.
McCabe gets $s for wife fr Clinton operative. Gets kicked out of staff meeting about Clinton email case. Leaks to
Barrett to hide his conflicts. Blames NYOF & WFO. This triggers internal & external investigations of leak.
At same time, @tracybeanz documents Lynch is using FBI NYFO to blackmail NYPD over Eric Garner case to control info about the
Weiner case & laptop. Here where things get *really* interesting. The NYFO is dealing w McCabe lying about them being
leakers to cover his own likes while Lynch is using them to control NYPD bc of weiner. At same time NYPD brass gave NYFO an
ultimatum: u deal w this or we go to the press. So the FBI grabs the laptop, Comey is forced to send email to
congress re-opening email case & that's all we're told. Or is it?
IG
report: FBI's Andrew McCabe 'admonished' other officials for his own leaks. As deputy director of the
FBI, Andrew McCabe "admonished" other FBI officials over leaks he himself authorized. That's one of the damning
revelations the Justice Department's Office of the Inspector General released in a Friday [4/13/2018] report. "Crafty
plan," was how Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan described the McCabe revelation to The Daily Caller News Foundation. McCabe
berating other FBI officials over the leaks suggests he was "trying to cover his tracks," House Judiciary Committee member
Jordan said.
Inspector
General First Release — Chris Farrell: "I don't think the FBI recovers from this". Judicial
Watch Director of Investigations Chris Farrell discusses the DOJ inspector general's report that outlines exhaustive
political corruption. OIG release #1 proving former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe authorized leaks to the media,
then lied to FBI investigators in an effort to cover them up. [Video clip]
An extremely interesting
letter. What we are seeing is an unfolding process, meticulously planned. The Strzok/Page leaks, McCabe
report today, what's coming: it's a cascading series of bombshells, aimed at taking down the Obama/Clinton crooks.
Team Trump, esp Sessions, has full control over the momentum and pressure. The hysterical tweets of Obama and Clintons
people, as well as the unhinged stories their media slaves are publishing, shows you how.much they're panicking.
The
McCabe Report Drops the Hammer. When outgoing FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe was fired on the eve of his
retirement last month, many Democrats protested that he was being cheated out of his pension for purely political
reasons. But the administration's official line — that McCabe had been fired for "lack of candor" after
lying to investigators about press disclosures he authorized — turns out to have been right on the money,
according to a Justice Department report released Friday afternoon [4/13/2018].
IG
Report Outlines How Obama DOJ Worked To Shut Down Investigation Into Clinton Crime Syndicate. Lost in the haze
of the Syria bombing, the Establishment Media's purposeful ignorance, and the ongoing ripples following the stunning FBI raid
on the offices of President Trump's longtime attorney, is the scathing outline by the Inspector General regarding how the
Obama Department of Justice aggressively shut down what was to be a widespread investigation into the Clinton Foundation
looking into allegations of widespread financial crimes. Talk about obstruction of justice!
DOJ
OIG McCabe Report Finds Obama's FBI and DOJ: Corrupt, Dishonest, Coordinated and Conspiring. The IG's report
related to terminated and humiliated former FBI Head Andrew McCabe is 39 pages in length. [...] Overall Comments: [#1] The
tone of the memo chastises McCabe for leaking that the Clinton Foundation investigation was open, not to challenge the rationale
for not sharing this investigation with the public, but rather criticizes McCabe for outing the Justice Department official
trying to shut down the investigation. Although perhaps it may not be customary to challenge the Departments' decisions,
due to subject in the investigation [the Clinton Foundation], by not releasing the information about the investigation the FBI
and DOJ prevented pertinent information from being reported to the American public significant to the election. This
information was not released until October 30th in a leak to the WSJ. [#2] Many of the FBI and DOJ characters
in the report appear corrupt, coordinated and conspiring to assist with the cover up of the Clinton Foundation
investigation and in leaking information to the press.
Indict McCabe.
Jimmy the Weasel Comey's flunky deputy director Andrew the Leaker McCabe lied under oath to Congress, according to the
Department of Justice inspector general. Indict McCabe for perjury, lying to a federal official, and disclosing
classified information.
Andrew McCabe
and James Comey Deserve Each Other. According to the just released report by the Justice Department's Office of
Inspector General, former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe wrongfully caused sensitive law enforcement information to be
leaked to the Wall Street Journal and then lied to investigators about having done so. The report runs
thirty-five single spaced pages and lays out in excruciating, meticulous, and damning detail how McCabe authorized an
anonymous leak calculated to make it appear that he had resisted pressure by Loretta Lynch's Justice Department to close down
the FBI's investigation of the Clinton Foundation during the 2016 election campaign and then proceeded to cover his tracks
with lies.
Andrew
McCabe Admonished FBI Officials For His Own Leaks. As deputy director of the FBI, Andrew McCabe "admonished"
other FBI officials over leaks he himself authorized. That's one of the damning revelations the Justice Department's
Office of the Inspector General released in a Friday [4/13/2018] report. "Crafty plan," was how Ohio Rep. Jim
Jordan described the McCabe revelation to The Daily Caller News Foundation. McCabe berating other FBI officials over
the leaks suggests he was "trying to cover his tracks," House Judiciary Committee member Jordan said.
James Comey's book:
This subsection has moved to a page of its own,
located here.
James Comey's TV interview, April 15, 2018:
This subsection has moved to a page of its own,
located here.
Disgruntled, whistle-blowing FBI agents:
FBI
veteran's tell-all reveals 'era of abuse' and destruction of bureau under Mueller and Comey. According to Mike
German, a well-respected 16-year FBI veteran who left the agency as a whistleblower in 2004, between 2001 and 2017 then-FBI
Directors Robert Mueller (2001-2013) and James Comey (2013-2017) turned the once-highly-respected agency into a "lawless law
enforcer." These and more revelations are reportedly revealed in German's latest book, "Disrupt, Discredit, and
Divide: How the New FBI Damages Democracy."
McCabe
Confirms Some FBI Employees [were] 'Frustrated' No Charges [were] Brought Against Hillary Clinton. Former
acting FBI director Andrew McCabe lent some credibility to a previous White House claim that some FBI personnel were upset
over the agency's decision, under the leadership of disgraced ex-FBI Director James Comey, not to charge Hillary Clinton in
the criminal probe of her private email server use. The claim that some FBI rank-and-file workers lost confidence in
Comey following his infamous press conference announcing that no charges would be brought has been in dispute.
Daily Caller
Reporting Confirmed that Some FBI Agents Were Fed Up With Comey. Reporting done previously by The Daily Caller
confirmed White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders' claim that some FBI agents were indeed unhappy with former FBI
Director James Comey's leadership. The Caller reported in October 2016 that FBI agents lost confidence in Comey after
seeing how the bureau handled the investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's emails. But since the
release of the Mueller report, media outlets have pounced on Sanders for saying that FBI agents had issues with Comey.
'Irreparable
damage to the bureau' — former FBI agents sound off on James Comey. James Comey has recognized a
kindred spirit in Welsh poet Dylan Thomas, who in 1951, penned the immortal lines, "Do not go gentle into that good night ...
Rage, rage against the dying of the light." To wit, the former FBI director confidently strode up to microphones
following two days of contentious testimony before House lawmakers, and let it all hang out. Comey, the man some
sympathetic media-types have referred to as a humble servant-leader, seized the opportunity to settle some old scores as
he pilloried Fox News and the Republican Party.
"Rank
and File" — A Conspicuous Absence of Visible Indignation. Against a rather enlightening week of
activity from within the DOJ and FBI, last night I posited the question: "If the FBI and DOJ were not institutionally
corrupt wouldn't we have seen multiple whistle-blowers this year?" The purpose of the question is to draw attention
to an empirical reality. By now we understand many of the big picture details behind DOJ and FBI efforts to weaponize the
institutions of government to target their political opposition, namely Donald Trump. With the removal of so many officials
within the institutions, the question becomes less rhetorical. If the corruption is removed, where are the 'rank and file'
whistle-blowers surfacing from underneath the now replaced leadership? Why haven't we seen anyone from within the system
come forth to tell their story?
Almost, but not quite off-topic:
Whistleblower
Exposes Key Player in FBI Russia Probe: "It was all a Set-up". Adam Lovinger, a former Defense Department
analyst, never expected that what he stumbled on during his final months at the Pentagon would expose an integral player in
the FBI's handling of President Donald Trump's campaign and alleged Russia collusion. Lovinger, a whistleblower, is now
battling to save his career.
FBI
agent removed from Russia probe for anti-Trump texts says he's willing to testify before Congress. The FBI
agent who was removed from the investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential campaign for sending anti-Trump
texts intends to testify before the House Judiciary Committee and any other congressional committee that asks, his attorney
said in a letter made public Sunday [6/17/2018]. Peter Strzok, who was singled out in a recent Justice Department
inspector general report for the politically charged messages, would be willing to testify without immunity, and he would not
invoke his Fifth Amendment rights in response to any question, his attorney, Aitan Goelman, said in an interview Sunday.
Strzok has become a special target of President Trump, who has used the texts to question the Russia investigation.
Goelman said Strzok "wants the chance to clear his name and tell his story."
Top
FBI Insider Who Quit Over Rigged Hillary Probe Ready to Spill Beans on Comey & Obama to Congress. An FBI agent
who quit his top position over the bureau's handling of the Hillary Clinton email investigation is heading to Congress to
testify. John Giacalone, who led the Clinton investigation for the first seven months, will reportedly expose former
President Barack Obama and fired FBI Director James Comey for corruptly helping Clinton. There's a massive media
blackout on this because Giacalone is expected to testify that top brass at the FBI rigged the investigative process so that
Clinton could skirt charges for clear violations of the law. Exposing Comey also shines a big light on Obama, who many
believe was calling the shots behind the scenes to help Clinton.
Sources:
FBI Agents Afraid To Testify, Say Congress Likely Won't Protect Them. Even as a new Rasmussen poll shows a
majority of voters believe senior law enforcement officials broke the law to stop Donald Trump from beating Hillary Clinton
in the 2016 election, rank-and-file FBI agents who want to testify against their superiors to Congress feel they can't due to
an ineffective whistleblower protection law. These agents believe the sluggishness of the law exposes them to an
inordinate risk of reprisal, so they have remained in hiding and afraid to speak the truth.
Agent
Who Quit Over Rigged Hillary Investigation Heads to Congress. An FBI agent who allegedly quit the bureau over
his belief that the Hillary Clinton email investigation was rigged will testify before the House of Representatives, The Hill
reported. The joint investigation between the House Judiciary and the Oversight Committees — led by
Republican Reps. Bob Goodlatte of Virginia and Trey Gowdy of South Carolina, respectively — has been a
source of consternation for Republicans and Democrats alike. Conservatives have complained about the slow pace of the
examination into how the Clinton email investigation was conducted, noting that only two witnesses have appeared before it.
Tone
Deaf Rod Rosenstein Should Be Fired. [Scroll down] "There are [FBI] agents all over this country who love the bureau
and are sickened by [James] Comey's behavior and [Andrew] McCabe and [Eric] Holder and [Loretta] Lynch and the thugs like [John]
Brennan — who despise the fact that the bureau was used as a tool of political intelligence by the Obama administration thugs," Joe
DiGenova, a former United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, told the Daily Caller. "They are just waiting for a
chance to come forward and testify." In a statement to the Daily Caller, reported by the awesome Kerry Pickett, an unnamed
FBI agent claimed, "Every special agent I have spoken to in the Washington Field Office wants to see McCabe prosecuted to the
fullest extent of the law. They feel the same way about Comey."
Grassley
Reminds FBI Agents Wanting to Blow the Whistle: You Are Legally Protected to Do So. According to media
reports this week, a number of FBI agents are hoping to get subpoenaed in the Russia probe so they can expose corruption at
the top of the Bureau. In other words, guys on the ground are ready to talk about decisions made by the suits in
Washington D.C.
Heads Will
Roll. It may take a few more months to clear away all of the remaining roadblocks and stonewalling. But,
the incriminating documents will inevitably be procured. Too many people were part of the plot. Some will cop a
plea. Professionals inside the FBI are now coming forward, asking to be subpoenaed so that they can testify before
Congress. Motivated to clean up this mess, they want to share what they know. President Trump is now fully
engaged and demanding complete transparency. Even his worst detractors would attest to his tenacity. Once
Professor Halper is extradited from Oxford and is facing the possibility of life in prison for his central role in the
conspiracy, he will sing like an Irish tenor.
Sources: FBI Agents
Want Congress To Issue Them Subpoenas So They Can Reveal The Bureau's Dirt. Many agents in the FBI want
Congress to subpoena them so they can reveal problems caused by former FBI Director James Comey and former Deputy FBI
Director Andrew McCabe, three people in direct contact with active field agents tell TheDC. "There are agents all over
this country who love the bureau and are sickened by [James] Comey's behavior and [Andrew] McCabe and [Eric] Holder and
[Loretta] Lynch and the thugs like [John] Brennan — who despise the fact that the bureau was used as a tool of
political intelligence by the Obama administration thugs," former federal prosecutor Joe DiGenova told The Daily Caller
Tuesday. "They are just waiting for a chance to come forward and testify."
Report:
Rank-and-File FBI Agents Eager to Blow Whistle on Comey, Holder, Lynch. A new report claims that a significant
number of rank-and-file FBI agents are chomping at the bit to expose Obama-era leaders, alleging corruption and even criminal
violations of the law. These agents are signaling that the only way they can safely and legally blow the whistle is if
Congress subpoenas them individually to provide information about their former bosses. "There are agents all over this
country who love the bureau and are sickened by [James] Comey's behavior and [Andrew] McCabe and [Eric] Holder and [Loretta]
Lynch and the thugs like [John] Brennan — who despise the fact that the bureau was used as a tool of political
intelligence by the Obama administration thugs," Joe DiGenova, a former United States Attorney for the District of Columbia,
told the Daily Caller.
Coming
attractions: FBI agents speaking out about the abuses of Comey and McCabe. President Trump this morning
on Twitter applied the name "Spygate" to the ongoing revelations about the FBI and the Intelligence Community employing their
technological and human agent tools to spy on the Trump presidential campaign and transition. [...] It's a good title for
what is going to be a long form reality television program (as well as a political scandal and constitutional crisis, among
other far-reaching consequences). Despite the best efforts of the Trump-hating, Russia-Stormy Daniels-obsessed media to
ignore it, the story is going to build into a major factor in the coming midterm elections and far beyond.
Kevin Clinesmith
Will
the Arrogance of the FBI Ever End? FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith was convicted in August 2020 of lying to the
FISA Court in order to obtain a warrant to spy on the Trump 2016 campaign when he falsely denied that Carter Page was a
source for the CIA. For this felony he was sentenced to probation and community service. In June 2021, we learned
that the District of Columbia was restoring his license to practice law in August.
DC
Bar Restores Convicted FBI Russiagate Forger to 'Good Standing' Amid Irregularities and Leniency. A former
senior FBI lawyer who falsified a surveillance document in the Trump-Russia investigation has been restored as a member in
"good standing" by the District of Columbia Bar Association even though he has yet to finish serving out his probation as a
convicted felon, according to disciplinary records obtained by RealClearInvestigations. The move is the latest in a
series of exceptions the bar has made for Kevin Clinesmith, who pleaded guilty in August 2020 to doctoring an email used to
justify a surveillance warrant targeting former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page. Clinesmith was sentenced to
12 months probation last January. But the D.C. Bar did not seek his disbarment, as is customary after lawyers are
convicted of serious crimes involving the administration of justice.
FBI
lawyer that lied to judge on FISA warrant will be able to practice law again in August after zero jail time.
The Russiagate coverup rolls merrily along, with the agitprop media almost completely ignoring a startling instance of the
deep state taking care of its own, even when they are caught red-handed committing grave felonies. Does the name Kevin
Clinesmith ring a bell? He's the FBI lawyer that lied on a FISA warrant in order to be able to spy on the Trump
campaign by falsely implicating Carter Page. He was caught red-handed in altering an email 180 degrees. Lying
to a judge is a serious offense for anyone. But for an officer of the court, one who works for the government and has a
heightened obligation to serve justice, to lie to a court is a very serious breach. Failure to punish government
officials who perjure themselves in order to spy on innocent citizens and a presidential campaign invites the worst kind of
abuse. It plants the seeds of tyranny.
Kevin Clinesmith
has received a Temporary Disciplinary Suspension from the DC Bar. We have news to report on Kevin Clinesmith,
the former FBI lawyer and member of Team Mueller who altered a CIA email and mislead [sic] FBI officials in seeking the last
Carter Page FISA renewal. As of February 1, 2021, the DC Bar has suspended him "on an interim basis based upon his
conviction of a serious crime." Clinesmith's membership status is listed as "Temporary Disciplinary Suspension" on the DC
Bar's member search. We anticipate that Clinesmith will appeal this suspension, arguing (consistent with his arguments
to Judge Boasberg) that he did not "knowingly" lie about Carter Page's status as a source to the CIA.
Judge Boasberg:
The Clinesmith Lies Don't Matter. The sentencing hearing of Kevin Clinesmith, the former FBI lawyer who pleaded
guilty to altering a CIA e-mail to further the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant renewal on Carter Page,
took place on the morning of Friday, January 21 before Judge Boasberg in Washington, D.C. This hearing was the
culmination of an investigation by those within the Department of Justice who actually sought to do justice in exposing the
FBI's misconduct in opening Crossfire Hurricane, and the FBI's abuse of their power to spy on Carter Page and those
associated with the Trump campaign. While the process continues with Special Counsel John Durham's investigation, this
was one loose end that was ready to be tied. Those demanding Clinesmith to be incarcerated weren't being unreasonable,
though they were ultimately disappointed when Judge Boasberg sentenced Clinesmith to 12 months probation and no prison
time. In fact, they have every right to be angry.
The Game is Rigged.
The past week has perhaps been one of the most revealing weeks in modern history. The extent to which the system was
exposed for what it is, on multiple fronts, probably won't be matched again for at least a little while. [...] As RedState
reported, former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith, who was working with Robert Mueller, was given probation and a $100
administrative fee for his role in falsifying an email to renew the already illegally obtained FISA warrant on Carter Page.
[...] Out of all the nefarious, obviously corrupt figures surrounding this saga, Clinesmith was the only one charged.
Figures like Andrew McCabe and James Comey were named in credible criminal referrals, not by politicians, but by the
Inspector General, and the DOJ did nothing. [...] To recap, you can forget a date talking to the FBI and have a special
counsel crack your skull, but if you work for the FBI, forge a document, and lie about it in order to try to spy on a
political opponent, you get probation and glowing media coverage.
Banana
Republic Update: ObamaGate Operative Clinesmith Given Probation. Honestly, this is exactly the sort of
judicial farce I expected would happen once I saw that Obama appointee Judge James Boasberg had been assigned the case.
Former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith, the one and only ObamaGate figure to have been indicted for any crime by hoax-prosecutor
John Durham and the entirety of the U.S. Department of [No]Justice, was given the softest tap on the wrist possible Friday by
the despicable Judge Boasberg. [...] The corrupt news media will claim that Boasberg's absurdly minimalist sentence of
12 months probation, 400 days community service and a $100 fee was due to Clinesmith's decision to plead guilty in the
case. Yeah, tell that to General Mike Flynn.
FBI
lawyer who lied to FISA Court to wiretap Carter Page gets a slap on the wrist and sympathy from federal judge handing down
sentence. The message is out to the next rogue federal bureaucrats who contemplate committing crimes in the
name of wiretapping (or otherwise abusing the rights of) opponents of the Deep State: Don't worry! You won't be
doing any jail time and may even get sympathy from the judge — in the unlikely event you ever get caught.
Unleash the fearsome spying apparatus taxpayers provide against political opponents of Democrats. That's the clear
signal sent by FISA Court Judge James Boasberg (an Obama appointee to the federal bench, and a John Roberts appointee to the
FISA Court, and reportedly a member of Skull & Bones while an undergraduate at Yale) with his sentence of Kevin Clinesmith,
the former FBI lawyer who lied to the court in order to obtain a FISA warrant on Carter Page.
Ex-FBI
Lawyer Receives Probation For Altering Email About Carter Page. Former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith was
sentenced to probation on Friday for altering an email about former Trump aide Carter Page's relationship with the CIA.
District Court Judge James Boasberg ordered Clinesmith to receive 12 months of probation and perform 400 hours of community
service, a sentence far more lenient than the three to six months in prison sought by John Durham, the U.S. Attorney for
Connecticut. Clinesmith, who was an assistant general counsel in the FBI's cyber law branch, pleaded guilty on Aug. 19,
2020 to altering a June 2017 email he received from a CIA employee regarding Page. The CIA employee wrote that Page had
been "a source" for the spy agency through 2013. Clinesmith forwarded the email to FBI colleagues but altered the document
to say that Page was "not a source."
Ex-FBI
lawyer Clinesmith sentenced to a year of probation for falsifying document in Russia probe. A former FBI lawyer
who pleaded guilty last year to falsifying a document to justify the surveillance of a former Trump 2016 campaign adviser was
sentenced Friday to one year of probation. Kevin Clinesmith, who admitted altering an email so the government could
continue to wiretap campaign adviser Carter Page, received far less than the prison sentence the government had recommended.
Clinesmith was also sentenced to 400 hours of community service. The maximum penalty for his crime is five years in prison.
More
about Carter Page.
New
Evidence Implicates FBI Higher-Ups in Dishonesty of Anti-Trump Lawyer. For the past year, defenders of the FBI
have consistently downplayed the significance of an FBI staff lawyer falsifying evidence in the government's investigation
into Donald Trump's relationship with Russia. They argue Kevin Clinesmith's crime of altering a CIA document to obscure
the fact that former Trump campaign aide Carter Page worked for U.S., not Russian, intelligence was a rare lapse in judgment
by an overworked bureaucrat. It was not, his apologists say, part of any broader conspiracy to conceal exculpatory
information from surveillance court judges, who never learned of Page's history with the CIA before approving FBI warrants to
wiretap him as a suspected Russian agent.
FBI
lawyer Kevin Clinesmith, who lied on Carter Page FISA warrant, may get a slap on the wrist. The comparison of
the treatment General Flynn received from Special Counsel Mueller and FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith is receiving from Special
Counsel Durham is nauseating. General Flynn was bullied, bankrupted, and threatened with persecution of his son so
badly that he signed a false confession to a nonexistent crime. And until his presidential clemency, Judge Sullivan
continued the abuse. Clinesmith, in contrast, pleaded guilty to altering an email so as to obtain an extension of the
FISA warrant illegitimately obtained to electronically monitor not just Carter Page's emails, phone calls and text messages,
but those of everyone he communicated with (i.e., the Trump campaign). One does not alter an email submitted as evidence
to court by mistake, it is a willful act of deception. But now comes news that Durham is asking only for a sentence of a
few months, at most, for an officer of the court who knowingly lied to the court.
Durham
Seeks Jail Time For Ex-FBI Lawyer Who Altered CIA Email About Carter Page. U.S. Attorney John Durham is seeking
a prison sentence of up to six months for Kevin Clinesmith, the former FBI lawyer who pleaded guilty to altering an email
from the CIA regarding former Trump campaign aide Carter Page's past relationship with the spy agency. Durham asked a
federal judge in a court filing on Thursday [12/3/2020] to sentence Clinesmith to a jail term "between the middle and upper end"
of what federal sentencing guidelines recommend for the crime of making false statements in writing. Clinesmith pleaded
guilty to the charge on Aug. 19. He admitted to adding the phrase "not a 'source'" to a June 2017 email from a CIA
employee who had provided information about Page's relationship with the agency.
What
Other FISA Cases Was Kevin Clinesmith Involved In? The DOJ-NatSec Division and FBI reported issues of fraud
upon the FISA court in October and November prior to the IG FISA report release. Specifically the DOJ notified the FISC
that OGC Kevin Clinesmith had manipulated and falsified evidence. On December 5th, Judge Coller responded to that
series of notifications with an order. On December 9th, when the IG FISA report was made public, the FISC was given a
declassified version of the report and was able to review for the first time. It was from that IG review that Collyer was
able to establish the full context of the fraud upon the court. The court was given no advanced notification as to the
totality of fraud upon the FISC other than a preliminary 'head's up' on the OGC Clinesmith compromise.
Who Watches the Watchmen?
It was recently reported that FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith altered an email to bolster a suspicious FBI effort to obtain a
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court warrant authorizing the surveillance of Carter Page, a onetime employee of the Trump
campaign. If true, Clinesmith helped the FBI successfully delude the court into granting what was likely an illegal
request to spy on the Trump campaign. Clinesmith was reportedly expelled from special counsel Robert Mueller's legal
team for cheering on opposition to the Trump presidency by writing "Viva la resistance!" in a text message discussion.
Corruption
at the FBI, CIA and DOJ. One symptom of a society in crisis is the unreliability or even corruption of its own
auditors. After all, when the watchmen have lost moral authority to watch, who can be believed or trusted? Or, as
the Roman satirist Juvenal famously put it, "Who will guard the guardians?" It was recently reported that FBI lawyer
Kevin Clinesmith altered an email to bolster a suspicious FBI effort to obtain a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court
warrant authorizing the surveillance of Carter Page, a onetime employee of the Trump campaign. If true, Mr. Clinesmith
helped the FBI successfully delude the court into granting what was likely an illegal request to spy on the Trump campaign.
Mr. Clinesmith was reportedly expelled from special counsel Robert Mueller's legal team for cheering on opposition to the
Trump presidency by writing "Viva la resistance!" in a text message discussion.
Disturbing
Likelihood — FBI Lawyer Manipulated Carter Page's Own Communication With FBI to Target Him. There is
a very strong likelihood the documentary material that FBI Lawyer Kevin Clinesmith falsified was actual communication from
Carter Page to the FBI where Page was seeking their help in 2017. This revelation would explain and reconcile two seemingly
contrasting points:
• Point one — The media have asserted, based on leaks from the
principal reviews, the woods file manipulation by Clinesmith did not impact the validity of the original FISA application on
October 21st, 2017.
• Point two — The material Kevin Clinesmith did manipulate was so
egregious and unethical, it stands as one of the most clear examples of corrupt FBI abuse of power in recent history.
FBI
lawyer suspected in Russia probe origin was kicked off Mueller team for anti-Trump texts: Report. The FBI
lawyer under criminal investigation for allegedly altering a document connected to the surveillance of a Trump adviser was
kicked off ex-special counsel Robert Mueller's team for anti-Trump texts, according to a report Friday [11/22/2019].
The New York Times identified Kevin Clinesmith as the former FBI attorney under investigation by U.S. Attorney John Durham,
who is probing the origins of the Russia probe. It was reported Thursday that Mr. Durham is probing whether an FBI
lawyer falsified an email that was used to obtain a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court warrant to surveil
Mr. Page. Mr. Clinesmith was the primary FBI attorney assigned to the Russia probe in 2017.
New
York Times Confirms Peter Strzok Team Underling, Kevin Clinesmith, is FBI Lawyer Who Altered FISA Application.
The New York Times is confirming that Kevin Clinesmith is the "low-level lawyer" within the FBI who doctored evidence within
the Carter Page FISA application. As anticipated, the DOJ and FBI 'small group' leaks are from their individual review
of a heavily compartmented IG report; and now they are being selectively shaped by the favorite 'small group' media
network: NY Times, Washington Post, CNN, Politico et al. Remember, each of the principals only was able to see
the draft of the IG report specific to their outline therein. All principal reviews were very compartmented. No
principal has any idea what the bottom line conclusions are from the totality of the assembled compartments.
House
GOPer unmasks identities of anti-Trump FBI agents. A House Republican Tuesday [6/19/2018] unmasked two of the
five FBI investigators cited in the recently released inspector general's report for expressing anti-Trump and pro-Clinton
sentiment in work-related instant messages. The previously unnamed FBI officials — "FBI Attorney 2" and
"Agent 5" — are Kevin Clinesmith and Sally Moyer, respectively, according to House Judiciary Committee member
Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC), who revealed their identities over the objection of the FBI during a hearing on the IG's
findings. The two were assigned to the bureau's Hillary Clinton email investigation, according to the IG's report,
while Clinesmith also later worked as a top lawyer on the Trump-Russia investigation and the special-counsel probe.
Update and correction:
Sally Moyer
not 'Agent 5' in IG report on FBI. [Scroll down] Meadows then named Kevin Clinesmith and Sally Moyer as
two examples, and his staff later confirmed they were among the five unidentified FBI investigators in the IG report.
Dozens of media outlets reported the names, including the [New York] Post. However, Moyer's lawyer insists she is not
one of the biased five and "has not been referred for investigation." Adding to the confusion is that Moyer, who does
work in the general counsel's office, is mentioned throughout the IG report as a senior FBI investigator on the Clinton probe
who made key and controversial decisions in the case. Clinesmith, who in fact was referred by Horowitz for bias review,
worked as a second, more junior lawyer on Moyer's team. Clinesmith is "FBI Attorney 2" in the report, while Moyer
is, in fact, "FBI Attorney 1," which is not listed as one of the agents or lawyers cited for bias or referred for
investigation. Meadows' office says it regrets the "misinterpretation."
Washington Awaits John Durham.
We shall have to wait until December 9 to hear from Inspector General Horowitz as to what those "systematic failures"
were. Do these early reports on his work forecast a whitewash? It would appear so. But can anyone really
take seriously that those "systematic failures" took place in the absence of bias? Such a claim requires a great deal
of contortion. And the spate of stories last week suggest the form that contortion will take: blame will fall not
on Peter "We Will Stop Him" Strzok, the virulent Trump-hater who orchestrated the spying on the Trump campaign, but on a
low-level lawyer named Kevin Clinesmith.
Carter Page
This subsection has moved to a page of its own,
located here.
Redacted FISA documents released July 21, 2018:
Update:
At
long last, here come the declassified FISA warrants. We've known for almost a month that, according to Joe
DiGenova, the process of declassification has been underway for the FISA warrants that enabled spying on the Trump campaign,
along with other documents related to the Russiagate fraud. [...] No matter what the documents reveal, the media will
pooh-pooh them as insignificant and will want to move along to fresh stories intended to make the POTUS look crazy, or
dangerous, or corrupt, or boorish, or whatever new fantasy they can concoct to throw shade on his tremendous accomplishments
in triggering an outright economic boom, a restructuring of trade arrangements to our advantage, and a foreign policy that
leads from the front.
Tucker
Carlson Calls On GOP Lawmakers to Read Entire Unredacted FISA Memo on House Floor. On Wednesday night [8/1/2018] Tucker
Carlson called on Republican lawmakers to go to the floor of the US House of Representatives and read all of the FISA memos in their
unredacted form. The deep state FBI released the FISA documents to Republican lawmakers ten days ago but the pages were highly
redacted to protect the identities of corrupt Obama and intelligence officials. Tucker called on the lawmakers to do what Dianne
Feinstein did and read the entire memo on the House floor.
Next
step: House Intel asks Trump to declassify rest of FISA application; tantalizing clues about pages 10-12 and
17-34. The release of a heavily-redacted version of the FBI's application for a Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Act warrant to wiretap onetime Trump foreign policy adviser Carter Page has spurred calls to remove the
redactions, to un-black out the pages blacked out by the FBI before the document was made public. The long sections of
censored material have made it impossible to reach definitive conclusions about the warrant application. It has also
led to the publication of de-contextualized sensational accusations. For example, page 8 of the original warrant
application contains a passage which begins with two blacked-out lines, then includes the words "the FBI believes that the
Russian Government's efforts are being coordinated with Page and perhaps other individuals associated with Candidate #1's
[Donald Trump's] campaign," and continues with more blacked-out material. Is there a critical prefatory clause in that
sentence fragment? The answer is unclear.
FISA
Applications Confirm: The FBI Relied on the Unverified Steele Dossier. [Scroll down] In each Carter
Page FISA warrant application, the FBI represented that it had "reviewed this verified application for accuracy." But did the
bureau truly ensure that the information had been "thoroughly vetted and confirmed"? Remember, we are talking here about
serious, traitorous allegations against an American citizen and, derivatively, an American presidential campaign. When
the FBI averred that it had verified for accuracy the application that posited these allegations, it was, at best, being
hyper-technical, and thus misleading. What the bureau meant was that its application correctly stated the allegations
as Steele had related them. But that is not what "verification" means. The issue is not whether Steele's
allegations were accurately described; it is whether they were accurate, period.
Andrew
McCarthy Discusses The Stunningly Scant and Manipulated FISA Application. Andrew McCarthy appears on Fox
weekend to discuss the released FISA Court application used to obtain and conduct Title-1 active surveillance on U.S. Person
Carter Page. McCarthy's response is worth watching because he only recently (May) red-pilled himself and realized how
corrupt the DOJ and FBI had actually become. Prior to May of this year he was defending/reconciling every new detail to
the benefit of DOJ/FBI. [Video clip]
Mark
Levin: Abolish Secret FISA Court If Judges Can't Be Held Accountable. Appearing on FNC's 'Hannity'
Thursday night [7/19/2018], LevinTV host Mark Levin spoke about a letter his organization sent to FISA court judges on
alleged abuses from the Nunes memo. "If you're a judge ... and you don't do something about it? Congress needs to
look into this!" Levin said. "I damn well expect federal judges serving as FISA court judges to make sure that
[misconduct] wasn't committed in front of them."
At
Best, The FBI Misled The Court To Wiretap Trump Campaign, FISA Application Shows. The heavily redacted FISA
application the FBI used to obtain a warrant to spy on Trump campaign advisor Carter Page is supposed to vindicate the FBI
from charges of political bias. But there can be no doubt that the FBI withheld pertinent information from the judges
who approved a highly intrusive domestic spying operation during a presidential campaign.
The Withered
Branches on Mueller's Poisoned Tree. The civil libertarians of the press — those card-carrying ACLU
members who toss and turn at night worrying about the diminution of "privacy" — all rushed to the defense of the
FBI after the release of its disgracefully flimsy FISA warrant on Carter Page. The hypocrisy of it all takes one's
breath away, as reporters and commentators, normally so censorious of privacy violations, coldly cheered the government's
harassment of Page. The evidentiary basis for the warrant was nil. It rested upon nothing more than Hillary's
opposition research and partisan articles in the press, some of which were fed to the reporters by Hillary's opposition
researcher.
Confirmed:
DOJ Used Materially False Information To Secure Wiretaps On Trump Associate. Newly released documents confirm
House and Senate investigators' claims that the Department of Justice and FBI used materially false and misleading
information to secure wiretaps on Carter Page, a former volunteer foreign policy advisor to President Trump. The highly
redacted documents released in response to Freedom of Information Act requests show how the FBI was able to convince the
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to surveil the Naval Academy graduate and energy consultant for a year of his
life. The wiretap was applied for and granted in October 2016, shortly before the end of the presidential
campaign. Approved applications last for 90 days. The Department of Justice requested and received three
renewals, for a total of one year of surveillance. Despite claiming to the court in 2016 that "the FBI believes that
Page has been collaborating and conspiring with the Russian Government," the government has yet to charge Page with breaking
any of the serious laws it alleges he knowingly transgressed.
Proven
Lies to the FISA Court Should Immediately End Mueller's Investigation. We now know for a fact that the FISA
court was illegally deceived by the Obama Administration. The fake Russian dossier, paid for by Hillary Clinton's
campaign, was used to get warrants in order to spy on Donald Trump's campaign. The Trump Russian collusion story was a
hoax created by the Hillary Clinton campaign. The Obama Administration used that hoax in order to illegally spy on its
political enemies.
2016
Text Uncovered: Shows That Spy Op On Trump Campaign Leads All The Way Back To Obama White House. The
liberal media has been denying all allegations for more than a year now that the Obama White House had surveilled the Trump
presidential campaign back in 2016. We are now lead to believe that the Obama administration had, in fact, spied on the Trump
campaign after a recently leaked admission of one "informant." This individual had been "querying marginal Trump campaign associates
for information about supposed connections to Russia on behalf of former President Barack Obama's FBI," according to the
Conservative Tribune.
Judiciary
Chairman Bob Goodlatte Discusses Fraudulent/Misleading FISA Application. House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte
is deeply connected to the investigation on the specifics of the FISA abuse. The House Judiciary Committee has primary
oversight over the FISA Court and the use therein by the DOJ. [...] Earlier today [7/22/2018] Goodlatte joined Maria
Bartiromo on Sunday Morning Futures to discuss the Carter Page FISA Warrant, all it's redactions, and plans to proceed.
Additionally Chairman Goodlatte discusses John Brennan, James Comey, and Loretta Lynch being sought for questioning on their
actions during the 2016 Presidential Election; as well as compliance responses from Peter Strzok, Rod Rosenstein and Lisa
Page. The current DOJ and FBI elements of the intelligence community are only slightly less corrupt internally than
they were prior to the Trump inauguration. Institutionally they are still full of corrupt individuals; and
administratively they are managed by people concerned about retaining/protecting the institutions — not
eliminating the corruption. In our ongoing opinion this institutional emphasis is misplaced and misguided at best,
and complicit at worst; likely more the latter.
The
Associated Press Lies About The FISA Application. The Associated Press carries on a daily vendetta against the
Trump administration, systematically misleading the American people in articles that appear in hundreds or thousands of newspapers.
Thus, it is no surprise that the AP's story on DOJ's FISA application dump is nothing but Democratic Party spin.
Donald
Trump: FISA Warrant to Spy on Campaign 'a Disgrace to America'. President Donald Trump highlighted Monday
the revelation of the FISA warrant used to spy on one of his foreign policy advisers Carter Page. The heavily redacted
set of documents were released to the public on Saturday, revealing that the unverified dossier created by Christopher Steele
and paid for by the DNC was used to spy on the Trump campaign.
Even
heavily redacted, the FISA warrant to spy on the Trump campaign is shocking. 450 pages pertaining to the FBI's
FISA Warrant to spy on Carter Page have been released. Heavily redacted. Even with redactions, wow. There
is NO DOUBT at this point the fake Steele Dossier was used to get this FISA Warrant. Months of pimping that Papadopoulos
fake narrative down the toilet! Time to remind everybody yet again of what they already know: after TWO YEARS
'agent of a foreign power' Carter Page has been charged with... what was that? Take a guess. NOTHING.
Did the FBI Lie to the FISA
Court? Consider the source. The FBI did not allow the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to do just
that. Instead, the heavily-redacted application for a warrant to surveil U.S. citizen Carter Page obscures the
source. It never says, at least in the unredacted portions, that the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic
National Committee paid operatives to dig dirt on Donald Trump. This allows the warrant to talk of "research" and not
"opposition research." The warrant application shields the partisan origins of the "dossier" and talks of a "law firm" hiring
the investigators. In reality, Hillary Clinton's campaign and the DNC paid the law firm, which paid Fusion GPS, which
paid Christopher Steele (and, given the reference to a "U.S. person" in the warrant, perhaps others — unless that "U.S.
person" was, in fact, a U.K. person, which complicates the narrative of foreign interference) to conduct opposition research.
The FBI Goes
Full Nixon with FISA Report. Now, forced by a long-standing FOIA, the FBI has released, on a Saturday of course
(we're lucky it wasn't Christmas day), 400 plus pages of FISA court material used to justify the surveillance of Carter
Page... only three hundred plus pages were redacted, blacked out and completely unreadable.
FISA
warrant application supports Nunes memo. The weekend release of a highly-redacted version of the FBI's
application for a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant to wiretap onetime Trump foreign policy adviser Carter Page
has renewed the argument over the Nunes memo — the brief report produced by House Intelligence Committee Chairman
Rep. Devin Nunes detailing problems in the application. From the time of the memo's release in February, Democrats
and some in the press have denounced it as a collection of lies and mischaracterizations. On Saturday night, the
denouncing started again. "The only thing the newly released FISA documents show is that Republicans have been lying
for months," the lefty think tank Center for American Progress said in a typical response. Now, however, we have both
the memo and the FISA application, if in a blacked-out state. We can compare the two. And doing so shows the
Nunes memo was overwhelmingly accurate. Perhaps some Democrats do not believe it should have been written, or they
dispute what it included and left out, or they do not agree with its conclusions, but it was in fact accurate.
A Deep
Dive into the Scandalous FISA Warrant Used to Spy on the Trump Campaign. For those who haven't had the time to
review the 412-page FISA application that was used to spy on the Trump campaign, I've culled a few key highlights.
[#1] The application lied about Carter Page. Carter Page is described as "an agent of a foreign power", which
was and is clearly not the case. Carter Page is walking around free as a bird, giving interviews to anyone who asks,
and stating that the FBI lied about him repeatedly. [...] The entire Mueller special counsel was predicated upon a mountain
of lies. It needs to be terminated today. This is the greatest political scandal in American history.
Justice Dept. Releases Secret Carter Page Surveillance Documents
at Center of Partisan Clash. The Trump administration has disclosed a previously top-secret set of documents
related to the wiretapping of Carter Page, the onetime Trump campaign adviser who was at the center of highly contentious
accusations by Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee that the F.B.I. had abused its surveillance powers.
Democrats in February rejected the Republican claims that law enforcement officials had improperly obtained the warrant,
accusing them of putting out misinformation to defend President Trump and sow doubts about the origin of the Russia
investigation. But even as Republicans and Democrats issued dueling memos characterizing the materials underlying
the surveillance of Mr. Page, the public had no access to the records.
Why is
Mueller handing off key cases? Something has been going on with Robert Mueller's investigation of people
thought to have played significant roles in the Trump-Russia affair. The special counsel, assigned to investigate "any
links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Trump,"
has been farming out seemingly important parts of the investigation to offices outside his own. In April, Mueller
referred an investigation of close Trump associate Michael Cohen to federal prosecutors in New York. This month, the
U.S. attorney in Washington — not Mueller — indicted Maria Butina on charges of being an unregistered
Russian agent. And also this month, when Mueller charged 12 Russian intelligence officers with hacking Democratic Party
and Clinton campaign offices, he immediately turned the case over to the Justice Department's National Security Division for
prosecution.
Newly
Released FISA Docs Contradict Strzok's Sworn Claims He Had Nothing to Do With Carter Page FISA Warrant. Obama's
Deep State FBI and DOJ obtained a FISA warrant on Carter Page in October of 2016 and three subsequent renewals in order to
spy on Trump's campaign and transition team. Comey, Rosenstein, McCabe and Sally Yates all signed the FISA applications
even though Hillary's fraudulent Russia dossier was used as a pretext to obtain the warrants.
DOJ
releases 412 pages of top-secret FISA documents on former Trump campaign aide Carter Page. The Justice
Department released on Saturday more than 400 pages of top-secret documents pertaining to the FISA warrant obtained to
surveil former Trump campaign aide Carter Page. The documents were first obtained by the New York Times through a
Freedom of Information Act request. "This application targets Carter Page," the document said. "The F.B.I.
believes Page has been the subject of targeted recruitment by the Russian government."
Andrew McCabe
This subsection has moved to a page of its own,
located here.
McCabe and Rosenstein
This subsection has moved to a page of its own,
located here.
Rod Rosenstein
This subsection has moved to a page of its own,
located here.
Rod Rosenstein announces an indictment on July 13, 2018
This subsection has moved to a page of its own,
located here.
Christopher Wray
FBI
boss Christopher Wray denies Capitol riot taken more seriously than 2020 riots. FBI Director Christopher Wray
claimed the FBI is working just as hard to punish participants in the 2020 George Floyd riots as those involved in the
Capitol riot, though neither the numbers nor his own boss's words seem to back him up. Wray made the improbable claim
in response to questions during an appearance earlier this week at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library. [...] Republicans
have raised concerns the Justice Department has not put the same effort into prosecutions tied to the violent, racially
charged riots of 2020 as the storming of the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. The GOP points to nationwide rioting and attacks
on federal courthouses and police in the wake of George Floyd's death at the hands of a Minneapolis police officer.
FBI
director Christopher Wray allegedly made a hard-to-believe promise. In one of the more unbelievable statements
from someone working in the American government, FBI Director Christopher Wray has allegedly sworn that his agency will bring
down the bad guys named in Ghislaine Maxwell's little black book. Those pedophiles are toast, right? Well, I have
my doubts. To the extent that the FBI has seemed to take it upon itself to be a protector and enforcer for the Democrat
party, the only way I see it following up on the evildoers whom Ghislaine knew is if they pose a threat to Democrat party
political dominance. [...] And if you'll pardon me for even greater cynicism, given the FBI's conduct vis-à-vis Hillary
Clinton (destroying all the evidence of her wrongdoing), the phony Russian hoax (continuing an investigation after they knew
it was baseless), and the January 6 protest at the Capitol (which may have been another example of FBI entrapment), the only
reason I can see for the FBI to go after people named in Maxwell's book is if doing so will embarrass Republicans.
FBI
Director Chris Wray Tells Congress Antifa [was] Not Involved in Capitol Hill Riots, After FBI Arrests Antifa Leader, John
Sullivan, for Participating in Capitol Hill Riots. This is a rather remarkable soundbite all things
considered. Today [3/2/2021], during his congressional testimony FBI Director Chris Wray was asked whether Antifa
members participated in the January 6th Capitol Hill riot. Director Wray says the FBI "has seen no evidence" of Antifa
participating. However, on January 14th the FBI literally arrested Antifa leader John Sullivan for his role in the
planning, coordination and participation in the January 6th Capitol Hill riot. [Video clip] John Sullivan is
a left-wing agent provocateur within the larger Antifa movement. On the day of the Capitol Hill riots Sullivan embedded
himself with the MAGA movement and recorded his activity. January 14th, John Sullivan was indicted for his action.
FBI
Director Chris Wray Testifies There Is No Evidence of "Fake Trump Supporters" at US Capitol During Riot. FBI
Director Chris Wray testified before the US Senate on Tuesday in his first testimony since the US Capitol riot on January
6th. Wray told the Senate today the riot in the US Capitol was "domestic terrorism." Chris Wray also said there was
NO EVIDENCE of "fake Trump supporters" present at the US Capitol that day. Antifa-BLM organizer John Sullivan was at
the US Capitol and bragged about wearing a MAGA hat during the riots where he broke a window and stormed the US Capitol.
Why Does Barr Let Wray Lie and Flout
the Law? Judicial Watch submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request on February 16, 2018, to the FBI.
It sought text messages sent from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2015, between FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and
FBI attorney Lisa Page, FBI Special Agent Jennifer Leonard, FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok, and/or Obama administration Homeland
Security Advisor Lisa Monaco. In response, the FBI denied the request, asserting (incredibly) that text messages are not
subject to FOIA. Judicial Watch challenged the FBI's determination. It filed an administrative appeal with the
Department of Justice arguing that "text messages involving government-related business sent between government officials,
whom all of the persons identified in the scope of the request are, do in fact constitute government records that fall within
the purview of FOIA." In response, the Justice Department's Office of Information Policy remanded Judicial Watch's request
for "further review," but the FBI ignored the directive and continues to withhold any text messages. Judicial Watch sued
on October 19, 2020, just a few days ago, after the FBI failed to respond (again) to the remanded request.
How
corrupt is FBI Director Wray? Let me count the ways. If Americans disgusted at the shameless, partisan
shenanigans of former FBI head James Comey thought Christopher Wray was going to come in and clean house at the now disgraced
agency, they've got another think coming. To be fair, incoming Director Wray was faced with a multitude of questionable
FBI actions — and failures to act — by Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Clinesmith, et al. There
is voluminous evidence, for those with eyes to see, that Comey's crew purposely tanked two separate investigations into
Crooked Hillary and the Clinton Foundation. They followed that up by setting up President Trump's national security
advisor, Gen. Mike Flynn, and trying to imprison him for doing nothing wrong, a process that continues to this day
thanks to rogue federal judge Emmet Sullivan. Worse still, the FBI was also busy spying on Donald Trump, his campaign
and his administration, based on nonsense they knew was paid for by Hillary Clinton and promoted by John Brennan, the equally
repulsive and mendacious head of Obama's CIA.
Is
China Now In Control of Our Flow of Information? This week, the matter came to a head when Twitter's Jack
Dorsey and Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg proclaimed they will prevent Americans from seeing the New York Post's explosive
article about incriminating emails, documents, and pictures stemming from Hunter Biden's laptop. The emails implicate
Joe Biden and the Chinese Communist Party. [...] The laptop was dropped off at a repair shop and not retrieved. After a
90-day period, the owner of the repair shop contacted the FBI and gave them the hard drive. He retained one for himself
and gave two other copies away lest he be killed. The FBI sat on that hard drive for a year. It begs the question
whether Christopher Wray, by not conducting an investigation, is covering for the Bidens? If so, he must be fired
immediately! Is the FBI now censoring information and engaging in political partisanship on behalf of China?
Christopher Wray Must
Go. The FBI did everything it could to influence both the 2016 and 2018 election cycles in favor of the
Democrats with largely exaggerated claims about Russian interference, and completely fabricated claims that they made those
efforts in coordination with the 2016 Trump Campaign and 2018 Trump Administration. That is a matter of historical
fact. Given that history, can anyone doubt that Christopher Wray, who led the raging dumpster fire agency's 2018 Russia
collusion smear effort, was about to do it all over again yesterday, just 12 days prior to Election Day?
Unfortunately for Wray, though, Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe is not on board with the program. He's
what the DC Swamp denizens like to call an outlier, a wholly inconvenient person of power who isn't going along with the
program. When news circulated late Wednesday afternoon [10/21/2020] that the FBI was going to hold an important press
event to discuss election interference by foreign enemies, those of us who have followed this stuff for the past four years
had a single expectation: Wray was about to scream Russia collusion all over again.
FBI
Director Chris Wray On The Bubble? If the Senate Intelligence Committee (SSCI) was not so comprehensively
corrupt, it's likely FBI Director Christopher Wray would have been replaced a long time ago. Wray is an abject failure
in his position.
FBI
Director faces scrutiny over refusal to name Antifa as organization. Testifying before Congress, FBI Director
Christopher Wray faced questions from lawmakers on the FBI's flawed understanding of Antifa. "Antifa is a real
thing. It is a not a fiction," Wray said, "but it is not an organization or a structure, we understand it to be more of
a kind of a movement, or maybe you could call it an ideology." Rep. Daniel Crenshaw was not impressed, and
immediately challenged the FBI Director's assertions, "That seems to me to be down-playing it... This is an ideology
that organizes locally, it coordinates regionally and nationally, it wears a standardized uniform, it collects funds to buy
high-powered lasers to blind federal offic