The  Media  Bias  Page

Introduction:

Many people complain about political bias and incompetence in the electronic media, and many other people think there's no basis for such complaints.  For a long time I resisted the idea of producing a page like this because I thought it was too obvious.  Some of you still can't see it, so some of the evidence is presented below.

This page includes several subtopics, some of which (*) have moved to their own pages.  Splitting them up makes everything load faster.  After all, not everyone has fast internet service.

Political bias may be impossible to avoid in today's style of fast-paced 24-hour news coverage.  News programs today are apparently designed to retain the attention of hyperactive and impatient viewers — people with dozens of other channels from which to choose, and a remote control always nearby.  (Forty years ago, when you had to get up and walk across the room to change the channel, people stuck with a program for its duration.)  You'll rarely see a news story these days, especially during ratings periods, in which a single shot lasts more than three seconds.  On a normal day, almost every story is told in less than two minutes.  This results in a great loss of detail, and that's where the TV producer's personal bias comes into play:  he or she decides what parts of a story to include or omit.

As many people have pointed out, broadcast news is dangerous, not because of what's reported, but because of what is not reported.  This applies equally to both television and radio.  Fortunately the internet is becoming a more reliable source of daily news, and it helps fill in the gaps.  Personally, I haven't owned a TV since 1980, so the internet really comes in handy.  If you're looking for current national news, you can gather more information in five minutes on the internet than you can get in an hour of watching television.



The following subtopics are on pages of their own
... although some are further down this page.

Bias in general, as it relates to news media  (Scroll down.)
Specific examples of biased news coverage
Specific people and organizations often mentioned in the debate over media bias.
Bias related to gun control issues
Coverage of the "War on Terrorism"
Biased coverage of environmental issues
   ... including the media campaign against bottled water.
Biased coverage of economic issues
Bias related to social issues:  Race relations, feminism, "diversity", homosexuality.
Cultural and political bias in motion pictures
Cultural and political bias on television
    The V-chip:  An ineffective substitute for parental supervision.
Pro-Islam bias in the media
Sensationalism vs Journalism
Suppressed news -- examples of "spiked" stories
    Terrorist attacks reported as "isolated incidents"
    Un(der)-reported news stories about the war in Iraq
    The Secret Superhighway and the Homogenization of North America
News media critics
National Public Radio
The Fairness Doctrine
The Public Broadcasting Service
The New York Times
Dan Rather
Rathergate:  The CBS Memo Controversy of September 2004
    and other examples of media bias in John Kerry's favor.
Walter Cronkite
Helen Thomas
Other high-profile TV news personalities
Commercial TV Networks
Junk science, dubious statistics and rash presuppositions
Environmental Propaganda Movie Reviews
News Media Incompetence, Sensationalism and Dishonesty
Bernard Goldberg's New Book, "Bias"
Other commentary about news media imbalance
Links to other internet resources
Overflow section!  There's more material in the Spillway.
The Technology and Politics of Broadcasting,
    including the transition to digital TV, the V-Chip, closed captioning, and other topics.
Radio Broadcasting and the so-called Fairness Doctrine.



News media bias in general
The examples are too numerous to list.  But I'll try.

What is Bias?  Here are the "Seven Violations of Media Objectivity":
    1. Misleading definitions and terminology.
    2. Imbalanced reporting.
    3. Opinions disguised as news.
    4. Lack of context.
    5. Selective omission.
    6. Using true facts to draw false conclusions.
    7. Distortion of facts.

The Media Has Lost the Public's Trust.  A recent report indicates that the general public's trust in newspapers and television news are at all-time lows.  In addition, another report shows that newspaper subscriptions are facing an accelerated decline.  These reports, combined with the major networks news programs and CNN's continued slide in ratings, means the public is fed up with news coverage that is not fair and balanced.

Zogby Poll:  Voters Believe Media Bias is Very Real.  Nearly two-thirds of those online respondents who detected bias in the media (64%) said the media leans left, while slightly more than a quarter of respondents (28%) said they see a conservative bias on their TV sets and in their column inches.

Even Harvard Finds The Media Biased.  The debate is over.  A consensus has been reached.  On global warming?  No, on how Democrats are favored on television, radio and in the newspapers.  Just like so many reports before it, a joint survey by the Project for Excellence in Journalism and Harvard's Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy — hardly a bastion of conservative orthodoxy — found that in covering the current presidential race, the media are sympathetic to Democrats and hostile to Republicans.

Keeping the press honest:  "If you look at the surveys, we've accomplished our primary mission, which is to educate the American people about the bias that exists," he [Brent Bozell III] says.  "One survey in 1987 showed ... that only 25 percent of the people believed there was such a thing as media bias.  Today, according to a recent survey, that figure is 79 percent."

Poll:  Democrats Trust Media More than Republicans Do.  Harris released one of their latest polls on the 6th [3/6/2008] and it showed that less than half the general American public trusts the press.  With the state of the media today, this should come as no surprise to anyone.  But, the numbers are pretty amazing when it is realized that 54% of those responding said they did not trust the press while 46% admitted that they don't trust television news either.

'Whitewash' Indictment of Liberal Media Convinces, Says Zelnick.  No one does a better job than L. Brent Bozell III and his Media Research Center in documenting the liberal bias of much of the mainstream news media.  Some of their citations of my former colleagues' wisdom make me laugh out loud. Others make me furious.

The Fall of the American Press?  Many of the reasons given for the challenges facing the newspaper and the media in general are well known, but perhaps worth recounting. … [For example] journalists are no longer seen as disinterested parties pursuing the truth, but as elites who themselves profit from pushing certain agendas.  The revolving door between the halls of power and the news studios underscores this concern.

Media Lies:  Plenty know by now that in 2004 the progressive Pew Foundation published an extensive poll exposing the five-to-one ratio of liberals to conservatives in the news-reporting media.  Strangely, media outlets must believe that we have forgotten this because they continue marching forward just like the vain and gullible monarch penned by Hans Christian Andersen.
Media bias impacts the news you hear and don't hear.
Bias by Story Selection:  By selecting the story the liberals want reported, and ignoring the stories conservatives want reported, it's clear that the media elite aren't in the "news" business.  They're in the liberal publicity business.

BBC to probe its 'bias to the Left'.  The move comes just five months after another internal BBC report claimed that the organisation was Left-leaning, out of touch with large swathes of the public and guilty of "unconscious self-censorship" on issues it found unpalatable.

The Pulitzer Racket:  Conservatives often ponder why more young conservatives don't go into journalism.  Here's one easy reason:  The path to prizes and prestige doesn't come from fierce investigative probing into liberal sacred cows or sharp-eyed conservative commentary.  It comes from pleasing liberals with stories that advance their agenda.

Hillary On The Hotseat:  One need look no further than yesterday's Wall Street Journal to figure out why the Left has been so adamantly opposed to its sale to Rupert Murdoch.  The Wall Street Journal has had the audacity, the effrontery, to challenge, actually challenge, one of the Left's most cherished shibboleths:  Queen Hillary.  Doing what 'mainstream' journalists have failed to do for, oh, the last ten years or so (except when a Republican is president), the WSJ put the 'investigate' back in 'investigative journalism.'

Scandalous "Scandals".  Now that ABC News has the list of phone numbers given to them by the "Washington madam," the question is:  Whose names will they publicize if they find out that there are public figures whose phone numbers are among those they have?  Let us suppose, just for the sake of argument, that these names include Karl Rove and Ted Kennedy.  Are both names equally likely to be revealed?

All the news that fits.  Only a dyed-in-the-wool leftist would think to label CNN, MSNBC, the New York Times, the Washington Post and the three major networks, as the mainstream media.  Only liberals who are so delusional as to regard their politics as middle of the road could be that mistaken.  Normal people are aware of the fact that these news outlets are not only not mainstream, but are clear out of the water and perched on the far left bank.  However, those of the liberal persuasion have repeated that lie so often and for so long, I'm afraid they've actually come to take it as gospel.

Al-Jazeera now biased, says leaving reporter.  The most high-profile US journalist on al-Jazeera's English language service has left the channel, attacking its narrowing world view and increasingly anti-American editorial slant.  Dave Marash, a former ABC correspondent, said that editorial input from Washington had "gotten smaller and smaller" and that the Qatar-based management were exerting control on the channel's overseas bureaux.

CNN and Hillary Destabilize Pakistan.  We can now understand why Musharraf's November 3 state-of-emergency decree took foreign news outlets like CNN off the air.  Musharraf, who is one of the main targets of the al-Qaeda international terrorist organization, recognizes that the so-called "CNN effect" in global affairs can destabilize foreign governments, including his own.  It's no wonder that he recently complained about being betrayed by the Western media.

The Last March Of The Dinosaurs:  The Death Of Network News.  The nets can't change their DNA, and that DNA isn't meant for the world of new media.  They are slow when the new media is fast. … Worst of all, they lost their collective news judgment years ago, and still haven't figured out how to get it back.  They keep hiring people from inside the junior varsity bubble of the Ivies and J-schools and wonder why they can't break out of their Manhattan-Beltway bubble.

America is in Deep Trouble.  Though most Americans are far more conservative than anyone living or working in Washington DC today, the conservative movement finds itself playing defense to a long list of socialist anti-American aggressors. No, not the Soviet block or Red China, but your friendly DNC Headquarters, their minions in the press, and your next door neighbors, many of whom are unaware of their socialist standing.

Excerpts from How to Identify, Expose and Correct Liberal Media Bias:  Tips for identifying and documenting bias in news stories.

What can we do about media bias?  The Associated Press is the 500-pound gorilla of media bias.  They are the gatekeepers of our news and they're extremely powerful.  The liberally biased AP is a monopoly when it comes to distributing news to our nation's newspapers.  It's useless to complain to them though, because they don't care.

No candy coating here ...
Some of the media is still lousy.  When it comes to the liberal/leftist media in general, especially The New York Times, … The Washington Post, … and The Los Angeles Times, they never disappoint media analysts for their basic anti-Bush, anti-Republican, anti-conservative, anti-American, anti-military, anti-capitalism and free enterprise, and anti-Western civilization biases, stances, commentaries, and misinformation/disinformation.

Give 'em that liberal media bias.  The Media Research Center has released its 19th Annual Awards for the Year's Worst Reporting in its ever-vigilant attempt to point out some of the greatest examples of left-tilting bias in the mainstream media.  Next to Christmas, it is one of my favorite things about the month of December.  I offer a small sampling of my favorites.

Liberal bias in media is no secret, but now it's proven.  Our American media machine is broken.  Journalists can no longer be trusted.  Many conservatives have seen years of evidence that the mainstream media is shifting further and further to the left.  But this week a new study from the Center for Media and Public Affairs shows an unprecedented bias in the network news coverage.

Four Times More Journalists Identify as Liberal Than Conservative.  A survey conducted late last year and released Monday, by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, confirmed the obvious — that compared to the views of the public, conservatives are under-represented in national journalism while liberals are over-represented.  Jennifer Harper of the Washington Times discovered the nugget buried deep in the annual "State of the Media" report from Pew's Project for Excellence in Journalism and FNC's Brit Hume on Tuesday night highlighted the findings from the survey of 222 journalists and news executives at national outlets:  Only six percent said they considered themselves conservatives and only two percent said they were very conservative.

Hispanic news a GOP liability.  Although Spanish-language press is not monolithic, news coverage, and particularly political coverage, tends to focus on advocacy for its community, analysts said.  It's new territory that Democrats have been quick to grasp, deploying Spanish-speaking lawmakers to make the party's case on education, national defense and, most recently, immigration.

The Editor says...
That's just a roundabout way of saying that the Hispanic press leans to the political left even more than the English-speaking press.

Journalists dole out cash to politicians (quietly).  MSNBC.com identified 144 journalists who made political contributions from 2004 through the start of the 2008 campaign, according to the public records of the Federal Election Commission.  Most of the newsroom checkbooks leaned to the left: 125 journalists gave to Democrats and liberal causes.  Only 17 gave to Republicans.  Two gave to both parties.

Poll Finds Journos At Bottom Of 'Prestige' Jobs.  Hang down your head, journalist — your fellow Americans don't think your career is much to be proud of.  The annual Harris Poll measuring public perceptions of 23 professions and occupations came out Wednesday — and you can find journalists in the Bottom Ten.

Hitting a New Low in Bias:  The truth is, to be pro-life is to be anti-violence.  No one who is truly pro-life could ever advocate or engage in violence, whether shooting an abortionist outside an abortion clinic or tearing an unborn child apart inside that clinic.  But for the media, that truth doesn't fit their fiction of what "pro-life" means.  So they ignore it.

A Reporter-Turned-Congressman Waves Yellow Flag On Media Bias.  At their best, the news media help promote our democracy.  Like many Americans, though, I am increasingly concerned about a bias in the mainstream news media.  To me, there is a significant liberal slant in news reporting that prevents the American people from getting facts about critical issues facing our country.  Without facts, Americans cannot make informed decisions about issues, and our democracy is threatened.

No Extreme Democrats for MSM?  So, we have a "moderate" in Hoyer facing an extremist in Murtha in this fight for Party Majority leader.  But, one would be hard pressed to see any MSM outlet presenting the facts in such a light.  In fact, the MSM seems to want to present the story as a corruption issue instead of a war issue, even as they want to assume that the recent election is a vote by the electorate to get out of Iraq.

Americans See Liberal Media Bias on TV News.  By a 39% to 20% margin, American adults believe that the three major broadcast networks deliver news with a bias in favor of liberals.  A Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that just 25% believe that ABC, CBS, and NBC deliver the news without any bias.

New Evidence of Liberal Media Bias.  This study found evidence that conservatives were more likely to perceive media bias than liberals, but that both conservatives and liberals detected bias in media outlets that leaned against their political perspectives.  In the end, however, because conservatives were more critical of the media both in general and in response to specific outlets, the results seem most consistent with the claim that a liberal political bias exists in the mainstream news media.

How to Detect Bias in the News:  At one time or other we all complain about "bias in the news."  The fact is, despite the journalistic ideal of "objectivity," every news story is influenced by the attitudes and background of its interviewers, writers, photographers and editors.  Not all bias is deliberate.  But you can become a more aware news reader or viewer by watching for [these] journalistic techniques that allow bias to "creep in" to the news.

Affirmative Action for Conservatives:  Thomas Edsall, who served for many years as the top political journalist for the Washington Post, has told Hugh Hewitt on his radio show that Democrats outnumber Republicans in the national press corps by a margin of anywhere from 15 or 25 to 1.  That is important personal testimony and evidence from someone who toiled in the mainstream media.

We are biased, admit the stars of BBC News.  It was the day that a host of BBC executives and star presenters admitted what critics have been telling them for years:  the BBC is dominated by trendy, Left-leaning liberals who are biased against Christianity and in favour of multiculturalism.

Fair and Balanced?  You Bet.  I worked in newsrooms for most of 30 years, with a couple of breaks for grad school and political campaign work.  I can say with confidence that I can count on one hand the conservatives I worked with during those years in mainstream news.  They fall into two categories:  those with whom I worked in the early 1970s who were relics of the days when you might actually find a conservative in a newsroom, and a couple in the 1990s who, like me, had made a gradual transition from left to right.

Michael Moore and Bill Clinton:  Birds of a Feather.  The public has a right to know why Clinton didn't catch bin Laden and when "facts" in Moore's documentary aren't true.  Moore and Clinton's reactions prod the public to view skepticism and balance as biased attack.  Clinton even called it "a conservative hit job" and that the public questions about his role in not stopping bin Laden were there due to "a serious disinformation campaign to create that impression."  Plenty of conservatives have been the benefactors of "liberal hit jobs" on NBC, ABC, and CBS but it happens so often, usually no one notices.

Media Anarchy Has Its Downside.  One can't exaggerate how large Fox looms in the liberal imagination.  They see it as huge and mighty and credit it with almost mythical powers.  It is a propaganda channel whose mission it is to destroy the Democratic Party.  That's part of why Clintons' performance had such salience.  Finally he was standing up to an evil empire.

Attacking the Messenger:  The Left Unhinged by The Fox News Channel.  Since the dawn of the information age, groups have tried to manipulate news organizations by going after their advertisers. … Even in the recent attacks on the Fox News Channel, groups have used Rupert Murdoch's relationship with cigarette maker Philip Morris and how that led to Murdoch's vast media empire ignoring stories about the negative effects of smoking.  It isn't enough, however, to try to control the behavior of the American people by controlling the legal products they have access to in the marketplace.  The left wants to control what you think and read by controlling your information sources.

Prepping the '08 Media Battlefield:  The left hates Fox because it reports things that ABC, NBC, CBS, the New York Times and the Washington Post would otherwise conceal from the public.  The war on Fox will continue, because the libs know it's essential to prepare the battlefield for the 2008 election.  If they can marginalize Fox — and even revive the old "fairness doctrine" to kill conservative talk radio — they could restore the left's monopoly on national news.  So what are Republicans doing in response?  Nothing.

Crazy like a Fox (News).  As Fox News celebrates its 10-year anniversary, media watchers should appreciate how Fox, which tilts right, has provided balance to major new operations such as CNN and the New York Times, which tilt left.  Go to most newsrooms and you'll find a staff that overwhelmingly voted for John Kerry in 2004, while the rest keep their politics to themselves lest they be considered biased.  A survey of the Washington press corps found that 89 percent voted for Bill Clinton in 1992.

Liberal Media Allergic to American Values.  Elite news editors shrug at their reporters' highly politicized activities — from AIDS fund-raisers to pro-abortion rallies, environmental propaganda and unhinged Bush-bashing (new case in point:  New York Times reporter Linda Greenhouse's recent moonbatty screed at Harvard University assailing everything from Gitmo to the Mexican-U.S. border fence).  But wear a flag pin?  Heresy!

Big Government Solutions Don't Work.  Politics as usual is aided by the complicity of the media.  Economic ignorance, bleeding heart emotionalism, and populist passion pervade our major networks and cable channels. ... In countries where everyone knows the media produces government propaganda, people remain wary of what they hear.  In the United States the media are considered free and independent, thus the propaganda is accepted with less questioning.

Meet the Real Katie Couric.  On September 5, Katie Couric took the helm of the CBS Evening News, a program tainted by decades of Dan Rather's liberal bias.  But a review of Couric's 15 years as co-host of NBC's Today finds that she brings her own liberal baggage, and she seems unlikely to challenge the biased approach that has eroded the credibility of CBS News and the rest of the media elite.

New Network, Same Old Biased Katie.  After more than two decades in which Dan Rather used his anchor desk to push a liberal agenda — culminating in the forged document scandal in 2004 — the CBS Evening News needed its new anchor to be the epitome of fair and balanced journalism.  Instead, the CBS brass hired Katie Couric, who put her liberal fingerprints all over Today during her 15 years at NBC.

Talk about extreme … Rosie O'Donnell takes a back seat to no one.  When the real Rosie showed up a few years ago, throwing haymakers from the Far Left in her talk show, her public appearances and her magazine, the public backlash was severe.  So she took a sabbatical, to get "married," adopt kids and set up a family home.  Now she's back, lured on the airwaves for "The View," a talk show which claims to represent the opinions of women.  That's presumptuous in the first place; no show really reflects the infinite variety of female thought.  It's also sexist.  Imagine a program which claimed to be the last word in men's opinions.  The gender warriors would be out in force.

Reporting, opinions and 'just plain rude'.  Reporters have an obligation to maintain an objective approach to the stories they cover.  That's not to say they don't have opinions, but if they are going to have credibility as reporters, they need to keep those opinions out of their stories.  Instead, we've grown used to reporters becoming talking heads on television, where they speculate incessantly about the meaning of stories or the outcome of stories or the virtue of the people they write about.

The database double standard.  Here is the most insincere question a liberal TV news star can ask:  How can President Bush turn around his poll numbers? … The media's crocodile tears are not even laughable, just nauseating.  Pushing down the president's approval rating seems to be their daily task.

Media bias on full display.  The reason to point out that this military tribunal case was actually a 5-4 decision is because other 5-4 decisions get reported in a very different way.  For example, when the court upheld the University of Michigan law school's use of race in admissions in a 5-4 decision, [one of the nation's most important and influential newspapers] called the ruling "deeply divided."

You Can't Spell Pap Without the AP.  Like many of its contributing entities, it is a mere shell of its formerly unbiased self.

The Collapse of Network News:  For the last decade or two, the Big Three network news ratings have declined and their once-iron grip on public opinion has loosened, prompting this debate:  is this decline merely a sign of increasing 24-7 media availability (cable news, Internet sites) or is the liberal tilt of the networks driving conservative viewers away from these networks in favor of alternative outlets?

The Media Adore Warren Buffett.  Buffett targets people in general, not just a particular group.  In a press release, [Rev. Thomas J.] Euteneuer took aim at almost every aspect of Buffett's agenda, saying that "Warren Buffett's philanthropy aims at killing pre-born children not curing childhood disease, eliminating the poor not poverty, and destroying the developing world not aiding development."  That may seem harsh.  But while [Bill] Gates is dedicated to "global health" issues, he, too, underwrites the pro-abortion agenda.

DisHonors Awards 2006:  The most outrageously biased liberal reporters of 2005.

The political Pulitzers.  The recent unveiling of the Pulitzer Prizes had more of the same politicized whiff that the Oscars oozed earlier this year.  Merit is taking a back seat now to "edginess" in both the news and entertainment media.

Vote against an unethical media.  To my fellow conservatives, Republicans, and even independents, who are so frustrated with some in the GOP for abandoning the principles of our party, that you plan to sit out this election, I implore you to change your mind.  While I share your anger and disappointment, I am still eagerly going to vote on November 7th for one simple reason.  To stop those in the mainstream media trying to hijack this election.

Will the Media Drown in an 06 Election 'Wave'?  Like sportscasters, political pundits resort to clichés when the game isn't going according to their predictions.  If the expected Democratic "wave" fails to materialize — or if, against the odds, an electoral wave breaks to the Republicans' advantage — the punditry will be flooding the airwaves with clichés, backpedaling like a French army.  But pundits, like weathermen, recover easily from wrong predictions.

Bush-hatred is a threat to national security.  Would newspapers in the midst of World War II have printed the fact that the United States had broken German and Japanese codes, enabling the enemy to secure its communications?  Or revealed how and where Nazi spies were being interrogated?  Nowadays, newspapers win Pulitzer Prizes for such disclosures.

Give Back the Tainted Pulitzers.  It's a shame and a tragedy when the nation's two major papers win Pulitzer Prizes for running stories harming national security that were clearly based on questionable sources with a partisan political agenda.

The BBC's commitment to bias is no laughing matter.  It's high time the debate moved on from narrow notions of political bias.  Far harder for the BBC to gainsay is that it has a liberal cultural bias, one that envelops pretty much all programmes, not just news and current affairs.  If you want to find the most solid evidence of partiality, look at the BBC's entertainment output — its dramas, comedies and arts programmes.

The Clintonite who owns National Enquirer.  What the tabloid's readers, in politics and out, may not know is that a key owner of the Enquirer is a prominent New York investment banker and one of Hillary Clinton's key backers, Roger Altman.  Altman was an official in the first Clinton administration, and his name is often mentioned as a possible Clinton Treasury Secretary.

The media's partisan "domestic spying" fight.  When given a choice between more information about our intelligence-gathering methods and less safety, or less information about our intelligence-gathering and more safety, which do the public choose?  The public tends to prefer more safety.  The media prefer more information.  And the media would prefer the public believe it agrees with them, even if it has to cook a few surveys to establish that canard.

More information about the "domestic spying" issue can be found here.

All the news...  It's always fascinating to return from travel overseas and step back into the alternative universe of America's media elites. … Coming back to Washington is a reminder of just how anti-American the American media elites really have become.

AWOL in the War of Ideas.  It's one thing to give the devil his due.  It's another to do the devil's public relations.  How else to explain a dispatch from the Associated Press referring to Osama bin Laden as "an exiled Saudi dissident"?  Such spin may not be inaccurate but it's like calling Jeffery Dahmer an "eccentric gourmet."  It rather misses the point, don't you think?

The Decline of Mainstream Media:  What common sense has comprehended for decades now finds support by yet another scholarly study:  The media has a leftist bias. … As if to confirm that bias, over the past few months, the media have given this research scant coverage. … The researchers expected to find a left-leaning bias, but were astonished at just how behemoth this left-wing bias is.

The Late Jeane Kirkpatrick Warned of Media's 'Unaccountable Power'.  Jeane J. Kirkpatrick, who passed away Friday morning, adapted a 1983 speech on the influence of the news media, into the forward for the Media Research Center's 1990 book, And That's the Way It Isn't:  A Reference Guide to Media Bias.  She proposed:  "Some people believe, and I am among them, that the power of the media today constitutes the most significant exercise of unaccountable power in our society."

Simply Put, the US Mainstream Media Provides an Inferior Product.  The prevailing opinion among the overwhelming majority of the American public is that there are some very big problems with the mainstream media.  The most common problems noted are the unarguable existence of a political agenda and the elitist pose displayed toward the American public and those who govern.  While I generally agree with both of these observations, I also believe, when all is said and done, that we are simply being offered an inferior product.

American journalism's founding fathers:  People on the left and right fault contemporary journalism for (a) giving the Bush administration a free ride, or (b) extreme bias against all things Bush and Republican.  Charges of media bias and the controversy over good vs. bad journalism are older than the nation, literally.

Deceptive Polling:  Polls are among the most telling expressions of bias in the media.  They are very often agenda-driven, used to make a political point, or to pile on a favorite target.  The most controversial and flawed poll that has been most cited in recent weeks has been the CBS News poll finding that President Bush's approval rating was down to 34%.  But another poll, purporting to find that U.S. troops are weary of the Iraq War or want a premature withdrawal, is also suspect.

CNN Poll:  All Americans Are Racists.  For creating a story out of nothing and then finger pointing at US society and saying how evil it is, this Dec. 12th CNN story takes the cake.  In "Poll:  Most Americans see lingering racism — in others", not only is a somewhat leading poll cited as evidence that America is still rife with racism, but CNN uses comments emailed to them by their viewers as some sort of follow up proof for it!

NBC/WSJ Poll:  What The 'Today' Show Didn't Report.  These days, it is almost as telling what little gems media organizations choose to hide from the public about their own polls as what they share.  The release of the most recent NBC/Wall Street Journal poll is a fine example.

Pollster guilty of fake data conspiracy:  A polling company owner admitted participating in a conspiracy to falsify data in order to meet deadlines for clients.

Suspicious Surveys:  You can be sure that when the media release a poll tied to a major news event, it's often biased. … Take the ABC poll.  It was conducted from Aug. 17 to 24.  Yet for some reason it wasn't released until Sept. 10, the day Petraeus delivered his much-anticipated report on the surge.  We also wonder who actually conducted this poll on the ground in Iraq.  Hope they weren't the same local reporters and translators that U.S. newspapers and TV networks employ, many of whom have been found to be less than credible.

Media polls as instruments of propaganda.  The MSM's relentless propagation of Democrat-generated dezinformatsia has portrayed Operation Iraqi Freedom as a quagmire, the booming economy as an unjust bust and the President as a lawless spy and has even suggested that George Bush is at fault for high fuel prices.  All this certainly has taken its toll in the polls.  These polls become self-fulfilling when the MSM incessantly pushes a particular perspective, polls the indoctrinated masses in search of that perspective and then reports the results as "news."

Speaking of deception...
Sacrificing truth on the altar of diversity.  Houghton Mifflin's ploy was recently described by reporter Daniel Golden in a Wall Street Journal story on the lengths to which publishers go to get images of minorities and the disabled into grade-school textbooks.  A Houghton Mifflin spokesman claimed that able-bodied models are presented as handicapped only as a last resort.  But according to one of the company's regular photographers, the deception is the norm.  At least three-fourths of the children portrayed as disabled in Houghton Mifflin textbooks actually aren't, she told Golden.

Note:  Other examples of what is now called news "fauxtography" are shown at the top of this page.

Dow Jones Chairman on Media Power:  We're Goliath, Not David.  One of the most persistent tics of the passive-aggressive press is its denials of its power, that it doesn't run the country, or at least try to run the country.  All that journalism-school boilerplate about how the media is merely a watchdog, or like it's the BASF of democracy, you know, it doesn't make everything, it just makes the secret ingredient that makes everything better? Baloney.  Some of us signed up for the media-criticism business because the media want to pretend they're not major players in the political process….

The Fourth Estate and Public Opinion:  Several studies to assess the political views of national reporters in the major press pools of Washington and New York find that those reporters overwhelmingly self-identify as "liberal" or "Democrat."  A recent survey, in fact, determined that only eight percent of those reporters would vote for a Republican — no surprise to objective media analysts.

The scandalmongering co-presidents:  To [the news media, President Bush is] the enemy, and he must be taken out.  And they're doing everything they can to make that happen, including rigging the polls against him by oversampling Democrats, and including nonvoters along with voters, to make him appear even less popular than he apparently is.

Media Madness:  Those who wonder why fewer and fewer Americans are buying newspapers or tuning into network "news" need only look at this week's coverage to see why.  "Hard" news stories are harder to come by every day, and those events and issues that do get coverage carry more than just a "tinge" of bias, ignorance or both.

New York Times:  Less Communism = Bad News for Chinese People.  Apparently, not even the communists are socialistic enough for the New York Times.

Media Maelstrom Over Michael Brown.  "Where do I go to get my reputation back?" Ray Donovan, President Reagan's Labor secretary, poignantly asked that question when, after the media had adjudged him guilty, he was acquitted in court of corruption charges.  Former FEMA Director Michael Brown might ask the same question.

The news media.  Surveys galore have shown that somewhere around 90 percent of the writers, editors and other personnel in the news media are Democrats and only about 10 percent are Republicans.  We depend on the news media for information about government and politics, foreign affairs and war, public policy and demographic trends — for a picture of the world around us.  But the news comes from people 90 percent of whom are on one side of the political divide.  Doesn't sound like an ideal situation.

The pendulum is swinging away from patriotism.  When I was growing up, Veteran's Day, then called Armistice Day, was a great national holiday, with parades and expressions of gratitude to the military troops who kept this country free.  Now it is hardly recognized.  December 7, the anniversary of the attack on Pearl Harbor which started World War II, is barely mentioned in the news, but there is extensive coverage in the media on the anniversary of the first atomic attack on Hiroshima, and later, Nagasaki.

Bob Schieffer Plays Patty-Cake With Ray Nagin on "Face the Nation".  There was nothing, first and foremost on the journalist's plate, about Nagin's wild exaggerations about a death toll of 10,000 and the rampant rape and murder he and his top cops gave to the national media.  There was no question asking Nagin about his utter failure to order a mandatory evacuation until the last minute.  There was no question asking Nagin about his failure to evacuate citizens by city bus or Amtrak train.  There was no question asking Nagin about race-baiting and finger-pointing at FEMA and Team Bush.

All quiet on Hillary's plantation.  With [Al] Sharpton proudly looking on, [Hillary Rodham Clinton] threw the race card on the table with a big, noisy thwack.  "When you look at the way the House of Representatives has been run, it has been run like a plantation, and you know what I'm talking about." … Had Trent Lott uttered those words last week about Democrats, today he'd be unhappily retired in Mississippi.  But it was Hillary attacking Republicans, so the news coverage was very, very different.

New evidence of left-wing media bias.  A new study from UCLA confirms that the media veers sharply to the left.  Of 20 major news outlets studied, 18 tilt to the left.

The Plot to Kill the President:  Forty-two years to the day after President John F. Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas, an American Muslim was convicted of joining the terrorist organization Al Qaeda and plotting to assassinate President Bush.  A lot of media attention was devoted to the former but not the latter.  Could that be because the media loved Kennedy but hate Bush?

BBC edits out the word "terrorist".  The BBC has re-edited some of its coverage of the London Underground and bus bombings to avoid labelling the perpetrators as "terrorists", it was disclosed yesterday.  Early reporting of the attacks on the BBC's website spoke of terrorists but the same coverage was changed to describe the attackers simply as "bombers".

Media Bias Is Real, Finds UCLA Political Scientist.  While the editorial page of The Wall Street Journal is conservative, the newspaper's news pages are liberal, even more liberal than The New York Times.  The Drudge Report may have a right-wing reputation, but it leans left.  Coverage by public television and radio is conservative compared to the rest of the mainstream media.  Meanwhile, almost all major media outlets tilt to the left.

The Best Notable Quotables of 2005.  The 18th annual awards for the year's worst reporting.

Christmas Is Getting Less Merry Every Year.  Just when you think you have it figured out, life kicks you in the back of the knee.  Over my 30-year career in journalism, I have tried to resist generalizing about the media.  You know, that it is rife with left-wing loons bent on imposing a secular society on the country.  In the past, I would have never said that.  But that was then, this is now.  I have come to believe that the American press is so secular Karl Marx would be appalled.

L.A. Times admits false claim about Falwell.  A column by a rabbi published in the Los Angeles Times falsely asserted Rev. Jerry Falwell claimed lesbian actress Ellen DeGeneres played a role in the 9-11 attacks and Hurricane Katrina because she was the host of the Emmy Awards before both events.  The Times ran a correction explaining the Baptist minister "made no such claim."

The Leftward Course Of Human Events.  [The managing editor of Human Events was forced to resign upon the insistence of the Southern Poverty Law Center.]  How do you explain to your wife that you lost your job — not for some work-related grievance — but for exercising your first-amendment rights and, as a freelancer, expressing a point of view?

Substitute Any Other Group and the Liberals Would Be Howling.  The world's largest news service, the Associated Press, sent out a story today with an alarming headline that the appointment of Judge Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court would "tip" the Supreme Court to Catholics.  The story went on to identify the religion of each member of the court and indicated Alito's appointment as another indication that "Catholics have become part of the nation's political mainstream."

Wahington Post Goes After the Roberts' Children.  If you can't come up with something disgusting about the actual nominee or his wife then rough-up the kids some and see what happens.

Sen. Hutchison:  Roberts line crossed.  Citing "simple decency," Texas Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison demanded Friday [8/5/2005] that journalists quit poking around for details on Supreme Court nominee John Roberts' adopted children.

The People, the Press, and the Pulpit:  The increasingly important role of religion in public life presents a challenge for the press.  The media have particularly low credibility in this area — even journalists themselves have doubts about their ability to cover religious issues.  Public and press concerns reflect a huge but familiar gap:  on the one hand, the American public is one of the most religious in the West.  At the same time, there are more than a few non-believers in the nation's newsrooms.

Outlawing Thanksgiving Here and Abroad.  Everybody had a good laugh on November 17 [2004] when President Bush pardoned two Thanksgiving turkeys named Biscuits and Gravy.  The Washington Post noted that the event was covered by "dozens of international reporters, photographers and television cameramen."  But the stories we saw in the Post, on CNN and elsewhere neglected to mention that the President went on to speak eloquently about the religious significance of Thanksgiving.  The media are clearly uncomfortable with the topic.

A petty, partisan press.  It is hard to avoid the conclusion that the media are less concerned about the big picture today, or how all this will look in history, than with how the Bush administration's victory in Iraq will affect the 2004 elections.  After all, studies have shown that nine out of ten journalists vote for the Democrats.

Liberal whining about the media:  In its search for What Went Wrong, liberalism has decided to admit that it has a problem.  Surprisingly, the problem is us — the news media.  We went wrong, or rather, right.  We went and became conservative.

Journalistic bias? Part II:  The question posed in my previous column — “Does a (still) largely liberal news media (still) exhibit a largely liberal bias?” — can be answered both as a matter of logic and as a matter of fact, and in both cases, the answer is:  Sure.

NBC News Blames Bush for Iranian Threat.  Andrea Mitchell seemed extremely concerned that the new Iranian president may turn out to be one of those [1979] hostage-takers, and that his election may play into the hands of the Bush Administration.  In other words, don't blame the Iranian government for the fact that it is run by terrorists who hate America.  Blame Bush.

Raising the bar:  It seems the world of media — somewhat self-righteous at its worst — is in a bit of a philosophical pickle on this one.  For starters, many of the supporters of the notion to protect anonymous sources are the same publishers, editors and broadcasters who helped make this the year of "open government" and "open records."

How the Media Created Rovegate:  It's clear, based on the notes of his discussion with Matt Cooper of Time, that Rove wasn't aware of the facts and didn't have access to classified information about Valerie Plame's service or status in the CIA.  He said she "apparently" worked at the agency.  In any case, it turns out she isn't covered under a law designed to protect the identities of secret CIA agents.

What If Karl Rove Were A Democrat?  The Center for Individual Freedom has provided an excellent list of cases involving Democratic officials possibly violating national security or using classified information that have been ignored or glossed over by the major media.  It's hard not to conclude that the media are targeting Rove because he is a conservative Republican.

The Dems' obsession:  The Democrats and the Old Media are getting as much mileage as they can out of President Bush's reportedly low approval ratings.  But the smart money says they ought to be more concerned about their own problems.

Extreme Conservatives vs. Unlabeled Liberals.  Study shows there have been six times More "Conservative" than "Liberal" labels on network news since election day.

A seminar in old media liberal bias:  For an object lesson on Old Media liberal bias, read the transcript of the May 17 press briefing by White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan.

Liberal Media Lashes Out at Christians.  The culture wars have turned nastier than ever.  And if conservative Christians are offended by being called insane, stupid, sinister — or even the next incarnation of fascist storm troopers — they'd better get used to it.  The news media is a major player in these cultural conflicts, and if there was ever a pretense of impartiality when it came to liberal versus conservative, or secular versus religious, that disguise has been stripped away.

Disgraceful.  Most media hiring today is from universities where a military career is regarded as bizarre and almost any exercise of American power is considered wrongheaded or evil.

Fired Christian Radio Host Sees Ecumenism Behind Dismissal.  An evangelical Christian talk-show host is speaking out after being fired from the largest Christian broadcasting network in the country for questioning whether certain Roman Catholic beliefs were biblical.

Expert Mistrusts Polls Showing Public Support for Homosexuals in Military.  A conservative military watchdog says she does not agree with several media polls that show increased public acceptance for allowing homosexuals to serve openly in the U.S. military.

The MSM's life and death distortions:  However you feel about the Terri Schiavo case, one fact is indisputable:  The mainstream media coverage of the matter has been abysmal.  On a fundamental matter of life and death, the MSM heavyweights have proven themselves utterly incapable of reporting fairly.

America's One-Sided Campus Media:  For the past sixteen months I have been a weekly opinion columnist for UCLA's newspaper, the Daily Bruin, and have seen exactly how media bias works. … From the high and mighty editor to the yeoman reporter, the newsroom is the liberals' private party.  The conservatives in the newsroom are not welcome — and it's made certain they understand that.

The Joseph Goebbels award.  Events of this past year have shown the need for a special award in journalism for those who think that the purpose of reporting news is to cause the public to adopt the political views of those who do the reporting.

A Tsunami of Media Bias Hits America.  The anti-Bush media bias that preceded the President's re-election was back in a big way at the end of the year when officials of the United Nations and some influential journalists started a campaign blaming the U.S. for being "stingy" and "slow" to respond to the Asian tsunami disaster.  The purpose of the campaign was two-fold — to rehabilitate the U.N., making the organization look relevant in world affairs, and to damage Bush politically as he attempts badly needed legislative reforms of the Social Security, legal, and income tax systems.

This Just In:  Liberal Media Bias Comes to a Halt.  Gone are the days when the Big Three networks, plus the New York Times and the Washington Post, decided what was newsworthy, usually with a liberal spin.

Confirming John Roberts:  Journalists walk around with the knee-jerk assumption that they are the most essential forces of democracy, there to enrich the nation and its citizens.  They truly see themselves as the conscience of the country, the First Amendment ideal in the flesh.

Ari's bias briefing:  Fleischer was impressive in the nearly impossible job of keeping the anti-Bush hounds of the press at bay.  They were harsh in the first days, when they were bitter about not getting to suck up to President Gore.  They were hostile in the last days, as John Kerry's chances slipped away.

U.N. Covers Up Payments to Journalists.  Ian Williams of The Nation magazine, has been on the United Nations payroll, writing articles for the world body and even coaching U.N. officials on how to deal with the press. … Accuracy in Media has learned that the U.N. has been paying journalists here and abroad to spread the U.N. message to an American and international audience.

Fourth estate or fifth column.  There are still people in the mainstream media who profess bewilderment that they are accused of being biased.  But you need to look no further than reporting on the war in Iraq to see the bias staring you in the face, day after day, on the front page of the New York Times and in much of the rest of the media.

Fred Barnes Calls Sheehan a "Crackpot," Rues Media Focus on Her.  Barnes criticized both her and the media's treatment of her:  "This woman wants to go in and tell the President that the war is about oil because the President wants to pay off his buddies.  She's a crackpot, and yet the press treats her as some important protestor."

Rather Is Gone; Whining About Leftist Media Is Not.  Mark it well — the media does lean left.  News that comes our way is, for the most part, devoid of a perspective that reflects anything close to a Judeo-Christian, culturally- and economically-conservative position.

Liberal and Conservative as Defined by the Media.  Obviously American notions of "liberal" and "conservative" don't translate well to the complicated muddle that is politics in the former Soviet Union.  Yet that doesn't stop the American media from pretending as though they do.  Why?  Because to the establishment press, "liberal" and "conservative" aren't so much ideological descriptions as moral ones.  "Liberal" is the literary equivalent of a white hat for the good guys, while "conservative" is a black hat for the bad.

The news, askew.  Ideally, news should "slant" to the truth.  Practically, the presentation of news usually skews towards sensationalism.  As news consumers, we accept this, though too rarely compensate for it.

Ted Turner Compares Fox's Popularity to Hitler.  Ted Turner called Fox a propaganda tool of the Bush administration and indirectly compared Fox News Channel's popularity to Adolf Hitler's popular election to run Germany before World War II.  Turner made those fiery comments in his first address at the National Association for Television Programming Executives' conference since he was ousted from Time Warner Inc. five years ago.

Big-Media Dinosaurs Face Extinction.  As the big-media Dinosaurs die off one by one — the catastrophic meteor to blame for their impending extinction is their own damning construct — their transparent liberal bias.  That bias is now, and will continue to be the fossil fuel driving tomorrow's new media — a new media whose long awaited arrival, and much needed influence has already begun.

Egregious leftism in the media:  Most of the guilty insist they are mere mainstreamers, centrists – yet surely they know better.  They betray themselves when they open their mouths.

How Newt Gingrich Caused 9/11:  George W. Bush's record of accomplishment doesn't sit well with the History Channel, which recently linked the ascendancy of Newt Gingrich to 9/11.  The President's words shot in the face of the liberal establishment, and the History Channel's words seem to have been written by the liberal establishment.

Washington Post Buys Slate.com Where Nearly All Voted for Kerry.  In acquiring Microsoft's Slate.com, the Washington Post bought a Web magazine at which nearly every editor and reporter voted for Al Gore in 2000 and John Kerry in 2004.  Slate.com headlined an October 26 article about a survey of their own staff:  "At this magazine, it's Kerry by a landslide!"  In 2000, 12 of the 13 in the top editorial positions voted for Gore, with the 13th going not for Bush but the libertarian.

Newsweek's Senators to watch:  After perusing the year-end issue of Newsweek, I defy any editor there to deny this magazine is a mouthpiece for the political Left.  Their cover boy was Senator-Elect Barack Obama of Illinois, the "rising star," as the Democrats and so many admirers in the press have dubbed him. … Barack Obama is just another ultraliberal legislator from a blue state, another Teddy, another Hillary — another politician only the liberal media wants to usher into power.  And "News"-week is leading the charge.

The party of government.  A Pew Research Center survey of journalists and media executives conducted earlier this year found journalists identify themselves as liberals as opposed to conservatives by a five-to-one margin.  In a 1997 poll for the Center for Media & Public Affairs, 66 percent of respondents agreed that news media "favor a liberal point of view."  A Freedom Forum survey found that 89 percent of the Washington press corps voted for Bill Clinton over George H.W. Bush and Ross Perot in 1992, while Clinton garnered only 43 percent of the popular vote.

Media:  Ashcroft Was Worse Than Arafat.  It might seem odd to compare and contrast two recent news stories — the resignation announcement of Attorney General John Ashcroft and the Paris death of Palestinian terrorist Yasser Arafat.  But an examination of the two demonstrates the degree to which the "news" media's compass of objectivity is so terribly misaligned.  To read the coverage, you'd think Ashcroft was the tyrant and Arafat the liberator.

The fourth estate rumbles for more privilege.  Maybe you haven't noticed, but the mainstream media are suffering from the perception that they're just the teeniest bit arrogant.  Oh, who am I kidding?  They behave like they're nobles or a priestly class.  Dan Rather, Brian Williams and Peter Jennings might as well wear flowing ermine robes.  From their palaces in midtown Manhattan they determine what the peasants see and read.

Black Clergy Denounces "Racial Motivated Attacks" on Condoleezza Rice.  A coalition of black clergy Friday [11/19/2004] denounced recent "racial motivated attacks" by three editorial cartoonists, the Washington Post and the New York Times upon National Security Adviser Dr. Condoleezza Rice, who was recently nominated by President Bush to serve as the next secretary of state.

Obama fever:  Here are a few mainstream media rules of thumb:  Minority Democrats in public office are inspirational role models.  Minority Republicans in public office are embarrassing sellouts.  Minority Democrat politicians are principled.  Minority Republican politicians are misguided.  Minority Democrat politicians represent the hopes and dreams of all Americans.  Minority Republican politicians are traitors to their "communities."  These rules are unwritten, of course, but the minority politician double standard is glaringly obvious in the national media fawning over newly elected U.S. Sen. Barack Obama, Illinois Democrat.

Van Gordon Sauter, president of CBS News 25 years ago, on CBS News today:
"For one thing, it has no credibility.  And no audience, no morale, no long-term emblematic anchorman, and no cohesive management structure.  Outside those annoyances, it shouldn't be that hard to fix. … I stopped watching it some time ago.  The unremitting liberal orientation finally became too much for me."

What they didn't teach in Journalism school:  In [the] Wall Street Journal, Fred Barnes writes about a GOP official asking a group of twenty or so journalists how many knew personally an evangelical Christian.  Only a couple of hands went up.  Then the offical asked how many knew a homosexual and every hand went up.  Although conservative Christians make up 40% of the population and homosexuals make up under 5%, elite journalists don't know any Christians.  That shows up whenever they try to report on Christians or Christianity.

The Media Elite:  Where do they stand?  Robert and Linda Richter, of the Center for Media and Public Affairs, surveyed 104 of the "most influential television writers, producers, and executives" to find out where they stood on the issues.  Their results are as follows:
 • 93% seldom or never attend religious services.
 • 75% describe themselves as left of center politically,
      compared to only 14% who place themselves to the right of center.
 • 97% believe that "a woman has the right to decide for herself" whether to have an abortion.
 • 80% do not regard homosexual relations as wrong.
 • 86% support the right of homosexuals to teach in public schools.
 • 51% do not regard adultery as wrong.
 • Only 17% strongly agree that extramarital affairs are wrong.

What Liberalism Hides Behind Bylines?  The Dan Rather/CBS fiasco, together with its arrogant, delayed, pathetic and mostly unbelievable attempts at justification, introduces a more subtle, and perhaps more inimical, subject.  What militant liberalism lies hidden beneath the bylines of so many reporters who write news, or alleged news, for the print media?

Liberal media bias:  here's the proof.  Folks know what Liberal Media Bias is.  Even those who deny it have to know what the rest of us are talking about.  Anybody can read it between the lines, see it on CBS (also ABC and NBC), hear it on NPR, and almost feel it, it's so thick at times.  Like an oil slick over the news, LMB permeates American journalism's elite.  But defining Liberal Media Bias isn't easy.

Excuse me, sir, your bias is showing.  An article in the most recent issue of American Journalism Review reveals another layer of bias in broadcast journalism.  According to the article, network journalists routinely lobby politicians they cover for favorable votes on broadcast regulation.  The article tells how politicians whose votes benefit broadcasters receive awards from the industry.  Legislators who do not vote the way the networks want get threatened with negative coverage on the evening news.  According to AJR, "We need to see the media business for what it truly has turned into:  a huge economic special interest."

Media Critic Has Sharp Words for Media's "Radical" Style of News Reporting.  One of the nation's leading media watchdogs says there is a powerful element of the media today that has gone beyond mere "liberalism" and has moved into "sheer radicalism."

What media bias?  Larry Elder cites several examples of blatant political bias in network television news coverage.

The Liberal Media:  Every poll shows journalists are more liberal than the American public — and the public knows it.  Leading journalists may deny their bias, but every survey over the past 25 years shows journalists do not think or vote like the American public.  Reporters overwhelmingly vote for Democrats, their views on issues such as abortion and gay rights are well to the left of most Americans, and large majorities want big government even more involved in the economy.

L.A. Times poll skewed.  Kerry, Bush survey sample was 38% Democrats, 25% Republicans

"Partial truth" abortion:  Many in the media resent any suggestion that they are either politically biased or that journalists' personal views stop them from doing a good professional job of accurately reporting the news.  The way the issue of partial birth abortion has been reported — or not reported — gives the lie to such protests.

Nixon, Bush and the Media:  The press treatment of George W. Bush is motivated by hate, spite and a vicious disregard for the truth and the national interest.  What the media is doing to Bush is unprecedented — worse than what was done to Nixon because it lacks journalistic virtuosity.  What the media is doing to Bush is inexcusable because, unlike in the case of Watergate, there is no smoking gun, precisely because there was no crime.

Newsroom conservatives are a rare breed.  If you'd like to check out an endangered species, don't bother with a trip to the zoo.  Just drop by the newsroom of your favorite newspaper or TV station and ask to see the conservatives.

Liberal media?  I'm shocked!  A new survey by the Pew Research Center says journalists have political and ideological leanings more liberal than those of the general public.  Or, as a sensible headline might have put it:  "Researchers ferret out the obvious yet again."

More Stuff the Left Has Gotten Away With Lately:  The partisan mainstream media hates it when the Right points out their bias.  But sometimes we just can't help it.  Here are three recent comments by well known liberal senators that received little comment in the Big Media.  Thankfully, conservative sources will not let things like these slide.

Liberal media show their stripes every day.  Media bias determines which stories make it to the front page and which ones don't.

For truth in journalism:  Do the people have a right to know the biases of the people from whom they get almost all their information about politics, politicians, candidates and causes?  Seems to me that an honest journalist has to answer yes.

Tom Brokaw vs. conservative "jihad":  In an interview with Jane Hall in the most recent Columbia Journalism Review, Brokaw suggests there is no such thing as liberal media bias … and then asserts that liberal bias is an "obligation" of journalism.

A Lesson in Dallas:  Hitting the street and answering that leftist rant is one way even a small group of conservatives can force their message to stand next to the radicals in the so-called mainstream press.  Just don't expect much coverage from the press.

Hate speech from the left:  In December 1994 I wrote the first of what would become a yearly series of columns on the subject of liberal hate speech.  I had noticed that when a prominent Republican or conservative said something offensive about liberals, it typically set off a storm of media condemnation, while an anti-conservative smear voiced by a liberal or a Democrat rarely drew any protest.

The Communist Party And The American Media Elite:  Is America's left-wing media elite about to suffer the fate of the Communist Party of the old Soviet Union?  I ask this question because my weekend reading raised some interesting parallels between the Soviet leadership and the current structure of the US news media.

Liberal media bias, part I:  Bernard Goldberg, author of the bestselling "Bias" says, "If the media elites don't take the wake-up call, ...I think they're going to become the journalistic equivalent of the leisure suit — harmless enough, but hopelessly out of date."

Liberal media bias, part II:  Journalists somehow think that they are the only species on the planet who can keep their biases in check because they're professionals.  Well, I don't think that's true.

Liberal Media Bias, part III:  The problem there and the problem far more responsible for the public's losing trust is when the New York Times rams ideology down your throat in every part of the newspaper, not simply the editorial page.

Give Public Broadcasting its Freedom — Now.  Philanthropist Joan Kroc's recent gift of $200 million to National Public Radio adds to the millions of dollars in tax-deductible donations from corporate underwriters and private citizens that pour into public broadcasting coffers each year.  In light of the Kroc gift, and with growing evidence that public broadcasting has been almost totally commercialized, isn't it time to wean public radio and television from the millions of dollars it receives from national, state and local governments?

Does the media give soft-glove treatment to Democratic gaffes?  Critics of President George W. Bush derive great pleasure from his inability to pronounce the word "nuclear."  As a candidate, they ridiculed Bush for not knowing the heads of Pakistan, Chechnya and India.  But what of the gaffes made by various liberal politicians?

Journalists' liberal bias:  Why it matters, how it hurts.  Liberal bias matters.  This bias affects consumers of "news" in subtle and not-so-subtle ways.

We Distort, You Figure It Out.  This, of course, is no longer journalism.  It may be entertainment.  But it is not responsible information upon which we can any longer rely.

Silly liberal denials of bias:  The suggestion …that the news media do not tilt to the left, is just not serious thinking.  Or, if it's coming from those who would consider themselves serious thinkers, it's just not intellectually honest.

Liberals in denial:  What is it about many liberals that blinds them to their true nature?  What makes them think that they are unbiased, objective, open-minded, tolerant and free of "hate"?  Why are they so often in denial — even about their own liberalism?

Media suffer from acute denial syndrome.  The derision the big media holds for all things conservative, especially when that conservatism has a religious component, is beyond debate.

No media bias?  Denials of media bias seem to have become more frequent or more vehement lately.  Some in the media try to dismiss the accusation as old stuff.  But the only real question is whether it is true, because the truth doesn't wear out with the passage of time.

In denial about radio and TV.  Liberals are especially uncomfortable with people who worship God and not the state.  Most broadcast programming and reporting in big newspapers reflect these biases.

Media Bias Matches UNESCO Intolerance:  Popularizing the anti-Christian principles of the UN Declaration on Tolerance.

Media Bias on Media Bias:  One of the incredible feats of media journalists is denying that there is media bias by equating it with conspiracy theories.  When people share the same bias, they don't need a conspiracy.  The harm comes from the fact that most of the public gets to see only that part of reality which has been filtered through the same preconceptions shared by 90 percent of those in the media.

Will a new left-wing TV network rescue the despondent Dems?  Only the looniest leftist could nourish the notion that today's broadcast or cable-TV networks shortchange or suppress liberal views.

Media Bias Basics:  This study shows the political composition of the media — voting patterns, political affiliations and beliefs — as expressed to researchers by the reporters themselves.  This is followed by a review of public opinion on liberal media bias, and what members of the media have said about liberal media bias, and a guide to how to identify liberal media bias.

Quoting from "Media Bias Basics":
Seventy million Americans rely on broadcast television for their news.  They form opinions based on what they hear and see and to a lesser extent, read.  Since citizens cannot cast informed votes or make knowledgeable decisions on matters of public policy if the information on which they depend is distorted, it is vital to American democracy that television news and other media be fair and unbiased.

Media bias:  can they still deny it?  Why does it matter, the way the media frames issues and uses certain terms or expressions?  Ronald Reagan, for example, called his anti-ballistic-missile defense shield the Strategic Defense Initiative, or SDI.  But many in the media use the term "Star Wars," an expression that Reagan loathed.

Media Donations to People for the American Way:  Perhaps it's past time that we stopped calling these entities "news" organizations and called them what they really are:  liberal propaganda machines.

Profiles In Bias:  from the Media Research Center. Clever Is the Word for a Biased Media:  The professional news readers are very smooth, very clever — so clever, in fact, that they can slant stories to their liberal bias often without a ripple of suspicion.

Ethics and Morality Training for the Media?  Although we don't yet know what the facts are, the mainstream media has seized this story and is using it, to the great glee of the far left in this country, to indict the entire U.S. war effort in Iraq.  While our combat troops undergo this ethics training (which is already a standard part of their training), it might be a good idea if the mainstream media put its journalists and executives through "ethics training" to highlight the importance of adhering to legal, moral and ethical standards in their reporting, writing and broadcasting.

Small-Time Crooks:  The pattern is clear.  The current scandal frenzy is not a campaign against fraud — it's a campaign against business and capitalism.  The people leading the hysteria about "corporate crime" are eager to expose and condemn fraud by a private businessman — but they ignore or excuse it when the lies are told by federal employees.

Media Fraud:  Media bias is no longer news.  Poll after poll has shown that the vast majority of journalists vote for Democrats, even though the country as a whole is pretty evenly split between the two major parties.  By itself, there is nothing wrong with this.  It becomes a problem when media bias becomes media fraud.  Media bias in editorials and columns is one thing.  Media fraud in reporting "facts" in news stories is something else.

Out-FOXing the Media:  Fox News is on the side of the United States; it is the network for the Red states.

 Editor's Note:   When columnists refer to the Red states and the Blue states, they are making reference to this map which shows the county-by-county results of the 2000 presidential election.

All the News That Fits:  How the media color their coverage.

Serving Al Gore "We now have incontrovertible front-page evidence.  The New York Times is eager to run stories that are harmful to conservatives and they sit on stories that are harmful to Democrats."

New York Times on the DefensivePublisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr. comments on the newspaper's pro-homosexual bias.

The "myth" of media bias:  "Journalists have to admit that their bias leads to slanted reporting. ... It is also time for people to stop demanding the mythical unbiased reporting that has never existed.  An objective reporter is not one that takes no stand in covering a story, but one who in search of the truth reports what the truth really is."

Editorial:  Slouching Toward Censorship

Media Reality Check:  A weekly report on major news stories distorted or ignored by the mainstream media.

Newsweek:  Bush Is 'Dim and Perverse' in a remarkable departure from any pretense to objectivity.

GOP's Big Battle:  Media BiasBill Clinton "fulfills a campaign promise," but when President Bush does likewise, the mainstream media give a stunningly different spin.

Back to the top of the page



News media critics


Dallas Morning News Watch:  Here is the place to get an objective media bias analysis of the news coverage in the Dallas Morning News, and other media as well.  Comment is encouraged from Dallas Morning News journalists and editors, as well as readers regarding our critique of news bias.

Web Critics Take Aim at Old-Style Publishers:  A small but growing contingent of amateur and semi-professional media critics are taking aim at newspapers and periodicals, picking up where those papers' ombudsmen (if they have them) leave off.  One of the first to appear was SmarterTimes.com, a site that painstakingly points out flaws in The New York Times.  Since then, similar sights have cropped up that skewer the Los Angeles Times (LAExaminer.com) and the San Francisco Chronicle (Chronwatch.com).

Back to the top of the page



Other commentary about news media imbalance

Rupert and Hillary:  News Corp. CEO Rupert Murdoch's fundraising for Hillary Clinton was treated as a man-bites-dog shocking news story.  Keith Olbermann's little-watched MSNBC program went crazy with the news.  It has been assumed that Murdoch, whose $60 billion media empire includes the Fox News Channel (FNC), the Weekly Standard magazine and the New York Post, is a conservative who wouldn't be caught dead supporting a left-wing Democrat like Hillary.  In truth, Murdoch is an opportunist who plays both sides of the partisan street.

Obama Is Smart, Likeable and … a Contender?  The only thing the public hates more about the press than watching it harangue officials with gotcha questions is watching it cozy up to those same officials at Washington's annual round of press corps dinners, now in full swing.  Journalists are supposed to comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable.  So how come they're all in formal attire eating lamb and sipping champagne … ?

Stephanopoulos Urged Foreign Assassination.  Christian Coalition founder Pat Robertson prompted a firestorm of media outrage after he suggested that the Bush administration should assassinate a foreign leader who posed a threat to the U.S.  But when senior Clinton advisor George Stephanopoulos publicly argued for the same kind of assassination policy in 1997, the press voiced no objection at all.

Kennedy and McCain:  This Is Media Balance?  Conservatives and media watchdog groups are aghast at a longstanding radio debate program that has Sen. John McCain "pitted against" Sen. Ted Kennedy — "a discussion between the Democrats' favorite Democrat and the Democrats' favorite Republican."

Comedy Central's "That's My Bush" Targets First Lady

They Couldn't Get Dubya, So Now They're After Jenna

Back to the top of the page



Links to other internet resources

Media Bias Videos See for yourself!

Suppressed News dot com

National Anxiety Center: Information to refute the "crisis" news you often see in the national news media.

The Parents Television Council: "A nonprofit organization dedicated to improving the quality of prime time television, restoring positive values, and making TV a socially responsible medium."

Truth In Broadcasting:  provides visitors with direct links to RealAudio Internet broadcasts that discuss modern-day political, economic, and religious issues.  Each web-cast is archived and reports all the news that the controlled media never does.

TV–B–Gone:  A one-button remote control that sends the power-off code for every known make and model of television.

Back to the Home page


Custom counter developed in-house

Document location http://www.akdart.com/media.html
Updated April 3, 2008.

Page design by Andrew K. Dart  ©2008